HomeMy Public PortalAbout02-2011-16 S Ukiirg D
RESOLUTION NO. 2011 - 16 7l1 s/I '
A RESOLUTION AFFIRMING
CHIYODA USA CORPORATION (2007 Expansion)
OF COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENTS OF BENEFITS
WHEREAS,Chiyoda USA Corporation has heretofore been granted certain tax abatements
in consideration of certain benefits for the City of Greencastle; and,
WHEREAS, said company has submitted form CF-1/PP as of May 16, 2011 for tax
abatement granted in 2007; and
WHEREAS,the Greencastle Common Council has reviewed the CF-1/PP form, a copy of
which is attached hereto,and has found compliance with the Statements of Benefits as approved by
the Greencastle Common Council;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Common Council of the City of
Greencastle, Putnam County, Indiana, approves the CF-1/PP form as submitted as being in
compliance with the Statements of Benefits previously filed by Chiyoda USA Corporation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution of the Greencastle Common Council be
made a record and filed along with the CF-1/PP form with the Putnam County Auditor.
PASSED by the Common Council of the City of Greencastle at its regular meeting this 12th
day of July, 2011.
COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREEN STLE, INDIANA
4
slE,�
J nsie S. Bingham Adam Cohen
0/1/4,(, (' , _
) /;wci)o-/eze.:/iL
Mark N. Hammer Phylli Ross Rokicki
7
Teri .(S th
Approved and signed by me this 12th day of July, 2011 at-N,�`\ p.m. o'clock.
Susan V. Murray, Mayor
ATTEST:
Teresa Glenn, Clerk-Treasurer
3
NZCOMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENT OF BENEFITS( , PERSONAL PROPERTYFORM CF-1 /PP
State Form 51765(R I 1-06)�"'° Prescribed by the Department of Local Government Finance
t
INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Property owners whose Statement of Benefits was approved must file this form with the local Designating Body to show the extent
to which there has been compliance with the Statement of Benefits. (iC 6-1.1-12.1-5.6)
2. This form must be filed with the Form 103-ERA Schedule of Deduction from Assessed Value between March 1,and May 15,of each
year, unless a filing extension under IC 6-1.1-3.7 has been granted. A person who obtains a filing extension must file between
March 1,and the extended due date of each year.
3" With the approval of the designating body,compliance information for multiple projects may be consolidated on one(1)compliance
(CF-1).
SECTION 1 TAXPAYER INFORMATION
Name of taxpayer
CHIYODA USA CORPORATION
Address of taxpayer(number and street,city,state,and ZIP code)
2200 ST RD 240 EAST,PO BOX 494,GREENCASTLE, IN 46135
Name of contact person Telephone number
TAMMY NEWGENT (765)653-9098
SECTION 2 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Name of designating body Resolution number
GREENCASTLE COMMON COUNCIL 2006-30 AND 2007-1
Location of property County DLGF taxing district number
2200 ST RD 240 EAST,GREENCASTLE,IN PUTNAM 67008
Description of new manufacturing equipment,or new research and development equipment,or new information technology Estimated starting date(month,day,year)
equipment,or new logistical distribution equipment to be acquired. 12/15/2006
1800 TON INJECTION MOLD MACHINE AND BLOW MOLDING MACHINE Estimated completion date(month,day,year)
04/30/2007
SECTION 3 EMPLOYEES AND SALARIES
• EMPLOYEES AND SALARIES AS ESTIMATED ON SB-1 ACTUAL _
• Current number of employees 154.00 too
Salaries 4,381,326.00 3,557,352.00
Number of employees retained . 154.00 81
Salaries 4,381,326.00 3,096,476.00
Number of additional employees 7.00 18
Salaries
204,463.00 263,509.00
SECTION 4 COST AND VALUES
MANUFACTURING R&D EQUIPMENT LOGIST DIST IT EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT
AS ESTIMATED ON SB-1 COST ASSESSED ASSESSED ASSESSED ASSESSED
VALUE COST VALUE COST VALUE COST VALUE
I
Values before project
Plus: Values of proposed project 1,500,000.00 _
Less: Values of any property being replaced
Net values upon completion of project 1,500,000.00
ACTUAL COST ASSESSED COST ASSESSED COST ASSESSED COST ASSESSED
VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE
Values before project
Plus: Values of proposed project 1,481,950.00 250,800.00
Less: Values of any property being replaced
Net values upon completion of project 1,481,950.00 250,800.00
NOTE:The COST of the property is confidential pursuant to IC 6-1.1-12.1-5.6(d).
SECTION 5 WASTE CONVERTED AND OTHER BENEFITS PROMISED BY THE TAXPAYER
WASTE CONVERTED AND OTHER BENEFITS AS ESTIMATED ON SB-1 ACTUAL
Amount of solid waste converted
Amount of hazardous waste converted
Other benefits:
SECTION 6 TAXPAYER CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the representations in this statement are true.
Signature of autho' d representative ` Title Date signed(month,day,year)
i � l F 7 f 1e/i6,~ 0/ (
OPTIONAL: FOR USE BY A DESIGNATING BODY WHO ELECTS TO REVIEW THE COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENT OF BENEFITS(FORM CF-1)
THAT WAS APPROVED AFTER JUNE 30,1991.
INSTRUCTIONS: (IC 6-1.1-12-5.9)
1. This page does not apply to a Statement of Benefits filed before July 1, 1991;that deduction may not be terminated for a failure to comply with the Statement
of Benefits.
2. Within forty-five(45)days after receipt of this form,the designating body may determine whether or not the property owner has substantially complied with
the Statement of Benefits.
3. If the property owner is found NOT to be in substantial compliance,the designating body shall send the property owner written notice.The notice must include
the reasons for the determination and the date,time and place of a hearing to be conducted by the designating body.If a notice is mailed to a property owner,
a copy of the written notice will be sent to the Township Assessor and the County Auditor.
4. Based on the information presented at the hearing,the designating body shall determine whether or not the property owner has made reasonable effort to
substantially comply with the Statement of Benefits.
5. If the designating body determines that the property owner has NOT made reasonable effort to comply,then the designating body shall adopt a resolution
terminating the deduction. The designating body shall immediately mail a certified copy of the resolution to:(1)the property owner;(2)the County Auditor;
and(3)the Township Assessor.
We have reviewed the CF-1 and find that:
❑✓ the property owner IS in substantial compliance
❑the property owner IS NOT in substantial compliance
❑other(specify)
Reasons for the determination(attach additional sheets if necessary)
r \
Signature of authorized member I \ �� / Date signed(month,day,year)
Susan V. Murray, Mayors V 07/12/2011
Attested by: Designating body
Teresa Glenn, Clerk-Trea Greencastle Common Co ncil (CF-1/PP)
If the property owner is found not to be in subs nti compliance,the property owner shall receive the opportunity for a hearing.The following date and
time has been set aside for the purpose of considering compliance.
Time of hearing ❑AM Date of hearing(month,day,year) Location of hearing
PM
HEARING RESULTS(to be completed after the hearing)
❑ Approved ❑ Denied(see instruction 5 above)
Reasons for the determination(attach additional sheets if necessary)
Signature of authorized member Date signed(month,day,year)
Attested by: Designating body
APPEAL RIGHTS[IC 6-1.1-12.1-5.9(e)]
/iN‘ A property owner whose deduction is denied by the designating body may appeal the designating body's decision by filing a complaint in the office of the
Circuit or Superior Court together with a bond conditioned to pay the costs of the appeal if the appeal is determined against the property owner.
V N N N N N
N N N N N N N
E
N
O
0
0ON- 03) OT
I� t� ON0 O) IC)
N O O N
tn 06) O
''' N- 0 CO CO 0 0 to c0
p NCOCr
(� co d' o N
ff}6f) V3
C N
C C
E L
C)cu ea
2g
C -p -0
r 0 0
V C 3 L CU
coO cUB O E
N co
Oa r n.
- •— ao
CD
o Q) c CO
•SI— a 3aca a)
U O O N O C)N O ZAP •C
C ` O .2 CL
0 0 to 0) 0 L o�y
r— v 'C C L C7) N
p CU O o ` O
= CC WLt_ Ca0_ 5 F—
C) N- N- O CO C) C) C)
. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 N N N N N N N
O CV N M ` N N N
CO T
N
L t� CO CA Co N CO
0) O co T N N N N
T T T T T r T
E
Z
C d
N
.0
C)
C9
a.
o.
d
M }
O 0 co
cc
N
C li `) d)
ti. O . E
O C E 4)
U ao 7 CU
Q J ti z
M N C O O
0 0 E 7 0
ONO C CN �f
L Z 3 u) O C
L i C. W re CCO J V t