Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutResolution 2-2012-21 RESOLUTION NO. 2012- 21 A RESOLUTION AFFIRMING HEARTLAND AUTOMOTIVE LLC (2007 Expansion) OF COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENTS OF BENEFITS WHEREAS,Heartland Automotive LLC has heretofore been granted certain tax abatements in consideration of certain benefits for the City of Greencastle; and, WHEREAS, said company has submitted a form CF-1/PP as of May 10, 2012 for tax abatement granted in 2007; and WHEREAS,the Greencastle Common Council has reviewed the CF-1/PP form, a copy of which is attached hereto,and has found compliance with the Statements of Benefits as approved by the Greencastle Common Council; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Common Council of the City of Greencastle, Putnam County, Indiana, approves the CF-1/PP form as submitted as being in compliance with the Statements of Benefits previously filed by Heartland Automotive LLC. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution of the Greencastle Common Council be made a record and filed along with the CF-1/PP form with the Putnam County Auditor. PASSED by the Common Council of the City of Greencastle at its regular meeting this 12th day of June,2012. COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENCAS , INDIANA £,SIç7frn1i S Bingham Ad ohen ,l «6ti /ij ..t4LE. C - -4— �'' 7 rrA.: Mar N. Hammer Ph l Ro s Ro icki 7, 1?:) Terry i�iith Approved and signed by me this 12th day of June, 2012 at p.m. 'clock. c--------- -‘ c....,._-\.)• , m Susan V. Murray,Mayor ATTEST: cic L a R. Dunbar, Clerk-Treasurer f _ < COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENT OF BENEFITS rvrcm la--1 ( rr '7' " :) PERSONAL PROPERTY 4 State Form 51765(R/1-06) Prescribed by the Department of Local Government Finance INSTRUCTIONS' 1. Property owners whose Statement of Benefits was approved must file this form with the local Designating Body to show the extent to which there has been compliance with the Statement of Benefits.(IC 6-1 1-12.1-5.6) 2. This form must be filed with the Form 103-ERA Schedule of Deduction from Assessed Value between March 1,and May 15,of each year,unless a filing extension under 1C&1.1-3.7 has been granted.A person who obtains a filing extension must file between March 1 and the extended due date of each year. 3. With the approval of the designating body,compliance information for multiple projects may be consolidated on one(1)compliance (CF-I). SECTION 1 TAXPAYER INFORMATION , Name of taxpayer HEARTLAND �yy AUTOMOTIVE, LLC Address 0 r s 8 of t pp WARREN trDR and 2 VE number,city,state and ZIP code) GREENCASTLE IN 46135 Telephone number Name of contact person (765)653-4263 RITSUKO MURAKAMI-ABRAMS SECTION 2 'LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Resolution number Name of designating body 2 0 0 7-4 & 5 GREENCASTLE COMMON COUNCIL Location of property 300 S WARREN DRIVE 1 County DLGF taxing district number GREENCASTLE IN 46135 PUTNAM 6700E Description of new manufacturing equipment,or new research and development equipment,or new information Estimated starting date (month,day,yew) technology equipment,or new logistical distribution equipment to be acquired. 0 3/01/2 0 07 SEE ATTACHED LIST FOR EQUIPMENT Estimated completion date(month,day,year 09/01/2007 SECTION 3 EMPLOYEES AND SALARIES EMPLOYEES AND SALARIES AS ESTIMATED ON SB-1 ACTUAL 566 462 Current number of employees 11,978,000 15,867,159 Salaries 566 462 Number of employees retained 11,978,000 11,978,000 Salaries 18 Number of additional employees 377,520 3,889,159 Salaries SECTION 4 COST AND VALUES MANUFACTURING LOGIST DIST IT EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT R&D EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT ASSESSED ASSESSED ASSESSED COST ASSESSED AS ESTIMATED ON SH COST-1 VALUE COST VALUE COST VALUE VALUE ; Values before project Plus:Values of proposed project 1,466,261- Less:Values of any property being replaced Net values upon completion of project 1,466,261 COST ASSESSED COST ASSESSED VALUEED COST ASSESSED VALUED COST ASSESSED VALUE ACTUAL VALUE Values before project Pius:Values of proposed project 1,519,669 Less:Values of any property being replaced Net values upon completion of project 1,519,669 I NOTE: The COST of the property is confidential pursuant to IC 6-1.1-12.1-5.6(d). 'SECTION 5 WASTE CONVERTED AND OTHER BENEFITS PROMISED BY THE TAXPAYER WASTE CONVERTED AND OTHER BENEFITS AS ESTIMATED ON SB-1 ACTUAL Amount of solid waste converted Amount of hazardous waste converted Other benefits: SECTION 6 TAXPAYER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the representations in this statement are true. Signature of authorized representati j Title Date signed month,day,year) President — 7(2-- Form CF•11PP,peel-NACTP 1585-Software only copyright C 2012 DIS.Inc ClienliLoc PUTNAM OPT TONAL' FOR USF BY A DESIGNATING BODY WHO ELECTS TO REVIEW THE COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENT OF BENEFITS(FORM CF-1) THAT WAS APPROVED AFTER JUNE 30,1991. INSTRUCTIONS: (IC 6-1.1-12-5.9) 1. This page does not apply to a Statement of Benefits filed before July 1, 1991;that deduction may not be terminated fora failure to comply with the Statement of Benefits. 2. Within forty-five(45)days after receipt of this form,the designating body may determine whether or not the properly owner has substantially complied with the Statement of Benefits. 3. If the property owner is found NOT to be in substantial compliance,the designating body shall send the property owner written notice.The notice must include the reasons for the determination and the date,time and place of a hearing to be conducted by the designating body.if a notice is mailed to a property owner, a copy of the written notice will be sent to the Township Assessor and the County Auditor, 4. Based on the information presented at the hearing,the designating body shall determine whether or not the property owner has made reasonable effort to substantially comply with the Statement of Benefits. 5. if the designating body determines that the property owner has NOT made reasonable effort to comply,then the designating body shall adopt a resolution terminating the deduction.The designating body shall immediately mail a certified copy of the resolution to:(1)the property owner,(2)the County Auditor; and(3)the Township Assessor. We have reviewed the CF-1 and find that: 0 the property owner IS in substantial compliance the property owner IS NOT in substantial compliance ❑other(specify) • Reasons for the determination(attach additional sheets if necessary) Signature of authorized member Dale signed(month,day,yeah Susan V. Murray,Mayor arm. ,. _ 06/12/2012 Attested by: Designating t>o Lynda R. Dunbar,Clerk-Treasurer Greenca e Common ouncil(CF-1/PP) _ If the property owner is found not to be in substantial compliance,the property owner shall receive th portunity for a hearing.The following date and time has been set aside for the purpose of considering compliance. Time of hearing ❑AM Date of hearing(month,day,year) Location of hearing PM . 'HEARING RESULTS(to be compfetedaher thefreiring)' > Approved ID Denied(see instruction 5 above) Reasons for the determination(attach additional sheets if necessary) Signature of authorized member Date signed(month,day,year) Attested by: Designating body APPEAL RIGHTS[IC 6-1.1.12.1-5.9(e)) A property owner whose deduction is denied by the designating body may appeal the designating body's derision by filing a complaint in the office of the Circuit or Superior Court together with a bond conditioned to pay the costs of the appeal if the appeal is determined against the property owner.