HomeMy Public PortalAbout12 December 8, 1993 CommissionRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1993
...`
}<P
...........................
.............................
..............................
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
3560 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 100, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA
CONFERENCE ROOM A
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
4. AGENDA ADDITIONS/REVISIONS.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - Adoption of Resolution No. 93-018, "A Resolution of the Riverside County
Transportation Commission Declaring that the Acauisition of Fee Interests in Certain Real
Property by Eminent Domain is Necessary for the Widening and Realignment of State Highway
79, also Known as Lamb Canyon Road" to Acauire Property Needed for the Route 79, Gilman
Springs Road to First Street in the City of Beaumont, Measure A Highway Improvement Proiect.
Overview
Following the public hearing, it is recommended that the Commission make the necessary
findings as stated above and adopt Resolution No. 93-018, "A Resolution of the Riverside
County Transportation Commission Declaring that the Acquisition of Fee Interests in Certain
Real Property by Eminent Domain is Necessary for the Widening and Realignment of State
Highway 79, also Known as Lamb Canyon Road."
6. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS.
6A. Measure A Vision and Strategy Paper.
Overview
This is continued discussion on the Measure A Vision and Strategy Paper. The
Commission will be requested to consider some policy issues.
6B. 1993 Congestion Management Program Update.
Overview
The 1993 Congestion Management Program Update is scheduled for adoption at the
December 8 Commission meeting. The draft document has undergone the annual
review process outlined in Chapter 11 of the CMP, CMP Update Process, as required.
No substantive changes have been made to the document. However, new TIA
Guidelines were developed based upon the existing guidelines, which some local
jurisdictions have expressed concern regarding the adopted land use program.
Page 2
December 8, 1993
6C. Proposed Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Between the Riverside County
Transportation Commission and the City of Riverside.
Overview
This item relates to creation of a joint powers of agency to facilitate development of
RCTC property at the northwest quadrant of the Routes 91/60/1-215 Interchange.
6D. Study on High Occupancv/Toll Lanes: Phasing in Congestion Pricing a Lane at a Time.
Overview
This is a study sponsored by the Reason Foundation which addresses a mechanism to
handle freeway congestion in Southern California.
6E. Proposed Staffing to Proceed with Proiects in Riverside County.
Overview
The ruling on Caltans contracting out for services has affected the ability to proceed
with Riverside County's highway improvement projects. Staff will be making a
proposal to solve this problem.
6F. Upcoming Conferences.
Overview
Upcoming conferences are presented to the Commission to determine whether
Commissioners should participate: 1) International Conference on Fuel Cells - February
23-25; 2) Intelligent Vehicle Highway System (IVHS) America 1994 Meeting - April 17-
20; and, 3) 46th University of California Transportation Symposium "Reinventing
Transportation in California - May 11-13.
6G. CommissionerIs) Reports, if Needed.
Overview
This item is placed on the agenda to provide Commissioners the opportunity to report
on various Committees representing the Commission.
7. Sale of the 1993 Interest Rate Swap.
Overview
Staff and Goldman Sachs will make a presentation discussion the sale of the Commission's
swap for $600,000 and the overall impact of the Commission's swap program on our cost of
debt at the December 8 Commission meeting.
Page 3
December 8, 1993
8. Acquisition Settlements for the Route 79, Gilman Springs Road to First Street in the City of
Beaumont, Measure A Highway Improvement Project.
Overview
This item is for the Commission to grant the Executive Director the authority to approve the
settlement for property acquisition for parcels noted in the staff report.
9. SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES (SAFE).
Loss Recovery Services for Riverside County SAFE Motorist Aid Call Box System.
Overview
Riverside County SAFE has received a proposal from Recovery Management Services for loss
recovery service associated with the motorist aid call box system. The proposal would allow
Riverside County to recover 60% to 67% of damages to the call box system. RC SAFE would
not bear any costs should the contractor not be able to generate any revenues for the program.
10. TRANSIT/RIDESHARE/PARK-N-RIDE.
10A. Inland Empire Connection Routes 1 10/496.
Overview
On November 17, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
(MTA) Board of Directors voted to direct staff to send written notice to Riverside
Transit Agency, Omnitrans, and representatives of the SB 1402 and AB 1246
Committees of MTA's intent not to exercise their option to be a partner in the Inland
Empire Connection Routes 110 and 496 after June 30, 1994. The issue of regional
transit service and coordinated planning is once again before the Commission for
discussion and staff direction.
10B. Draft Social Service Transportation Action Plan and Inventory Report.
Overview
County transportation commissions and transportation planning agencies are required
to prepare a bi-annual action plan update in response to AB 120, the Social Services
Transportation Improvement Act. The Action Plan includes a description of the
Commission's social service transportation policies and its efforts to coordinate service
among the County's transportation providers. The inventory portion of the report
provides a listing of the public and private non-profit specialized transportation service
providers within the County.
Page 4
December 8, 1993
11. COMMUTER RAIL.
11A. City of Perris RCTC Property - Conceptual Site Plan and Specific Plan Amendment.
Overview
The conceptual site plan for the Commission property in the City of Perris is presented
for their approval.
11B. Proposed Parking Agreement Between City of Perris and RCTC for RCTC Property.
Overview
Staff is currently negotiating this agreement with the City of Perris. It involves parking
use of RCTC property by the City.
11C. Contract with Bove Engineering Corporation for the San Jacinto Branchline Rail
Corridor Study.
Overview
RCTC approval of contract with Boyle Engineering to perform the San Jacinto Branch
Line Rail Corridor Study for an amount less than $250,000 (final price to be determined
after Staff negotiations are complete) with 15% contingency.
11D. Ninyo & Moore - Completion of Phase 2 Preliminary Site Investigations on the San
Jacinto Branch Line (RCTC Agreement No. 93-191.
Overview
Ninyo & Moore has completed the Phase 2 Preliminary Site Investigations on the San
Jacinto Branch Line. Essentially, of the 32 sites evaluated, 27 can be considered to
have no extraordinary problems associated with them above and beyond any other
parcels previously obtained in easement or by fee title acquisition from AT&SF.
However, five sites are of special concern and may require further assessment and/or
remediation from (clean-up) before RCTC should consider any further action in relation
to them. Other parties (AT&SF, March Air Force Base and Southern California Gas)
should be required to complete any necessary additional studies or clean-ups.
12. CONSENT CALENDAR -- All matters of the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single
motion unless a Commission member requests separate action on specific items.
12A. Consent Calendar - Administrative Items.
12A1 . Sacramento Monthly Report.
Overview
A report on legislation, proposed, and passed, from DJ Smith/Will Kempton,
will be included in the Commission's December 8th meeting.
Page 5
December 8, 1993
12A2. Proposed 1994 RCTC Meeting Schedule.
Overview
The Commission, on an annual basis, approves its calendar for the year. Staff
is presenting the proposed 1994 RCTC Meeting Schedule for approval.
12A3. Amendment of D.J.Smith and Associates Contract.
Overview
This is to continue the contract of D.J. Smith and Associates as the Riverside
County Transportation Commission's Legislative Advocate for another year.
12A4. Resolution of CVAG Supporting the RCTC's Challenge to Calexico East Border
Crossing and New State Route 7 Proiect
Overview
This item is the Coachella Valley Association of Governments' (CVAGs')
resolution supporting RCTC's complaint concerning the proposed Calexico east
border crossing and new State Route 7 projects in Imperial County.
12A5. Adoption of "Inland Area Air Quality Agenda"
Overview
This item is the result of a proposed "common agenda" to promote the air
quality and mobility goals of RCTC, SANBAG, WRCOG, and CVAG.
12B. Consent Calendar - Transit/Rideshare/Park-n-Ride.
12B1. FY 1993-94 Unmet Transit Needs Hearings.
Overview
Annually, the Riverside County Transportation Commission is required to hold
at least one public hearing for the purpose of receiving public testimony on
unmet transit needs. Staff recommends that the Commission hold unmet
transit needs hearings in Riverside on January 12, in Blythe on January 20, and
in Palm Desert on February 9, 1994.
12B2. Resolution 93-017: "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation
Commission Adopting a Finding that there are no Unmet Transit Needs that are
Reasonable to meet in the Palo Verde Valley Area."
Overview
In May 1993, the Commission made a finding that there are no unmet transit
needs which are reasonable to meet in the Palo Verde Valley Area. We have
been informed by Caltrans that the finding must be adopted by resolution. This
agenda item is a resolution to comply with this requirement.
Page 6
December 8, 1993
12B3. Reouest for Additional Allocation of Local Transportation Funds from the
Riverside Transit Agency.
Overview
This item is a request from the Riverside Transit Agency for an increase of
$35,592 in local transportation funds to cover the unanticipated increase in
expenses to operate the Inland Empire Connection Routes 1 10/496.
12B4. ClubRide Merchant Discount Catalog Program Agreement.
Overview
The development of a Merchant Discount Catalog Program is underway and
will be used to replace the discount coupon book distributed as a benefit to
membership in Club Ride during its's first year. Approval of an agreement
between the Commission and participating program merchants is required to
delineate responsibilities of the parties.
1265. Measure A Park-n-Ride Lease Program Update.
Overview
In October 1990, the Commission authorized the Executive Director to execute
park-n-ride lease agreements meeting a maximum cost per space criteria. As
a matter of routine, the Commission is being requested to review and renew
that authorization. In addition, the existing consultant agreement with Inland
Transportation Services is proposed to be amended through December 31,
1994, at established labor rates.
12B6. San Bernardino Associated Governments' Option Rideshare Program.
Overview
Pursuant to an RCTC/SANBAG agreement, Commission and consultant staff
have completed development of a commuter incentive program for San
Bernardino County. Introduced November 1st, Option Rideshare, has generated
strong interest among employers and commuters.
1 2C. Consent Calendar - Highways/Local Streets & Roads.
12C1. Reimbursement of Out -of -Pocket Pre -Development Expenses for Spruce
Industrial Park Property Located at Spruce Street and Route 91 Freeway.
Overview
Authorize expenditure of $11,302.43 to reimburse Spruce Industrial Park
Limited Partnership for their approved out-of-pocket pre -development expenses
related to the sale of their property to RCTC in August of 1992.
Page 7
December 8, 1993
12C2. Comprehensive Interchange List.
Overview
Staff has been working with Western County Cities and the County of
Riverside in assembling a list of interchanges in Western County which will
require improvements. A partial list is presented, with some jurisdictions still
providing data.
12C3. Measure A Capital Improvement Program and Surface Transportation Program
Amendment Reauest for the City of Blythe.
Overview
This item relates to amendment to the CIP/STP for the City of Blythe.
12D. Consent Calendar - Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE).
12D1. Cooperative Agreement Between Riverside County SAFE and Caltrans District
11 for Installation of Motorist Aid Call Boxes in Riverside County.
Overview
In order for the Riverside County Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies
(RC SAFE) to install additional call boxes on State highways, it must receive
permission from the appropriate Caltrans District through an encroachment
permit. However, RC SAFE must first execute a Cooperative Agreement with
the Caltrans District before an encroachment permit will be issued. RC SAFE's
previous cooperative agreement with Caltrans District 11 has expired.-
12D2. Riverside County SAFE "Cellular 911 Only" Telephone Program Update.
Overview
At the November 10, 1993 Board meeting, staff was directed to proceed with
developing a Request for Proposal (RFP) for "Cellular 91 1 Only" telephones to
provide telecommunications capability to the motoring public with disabilities
in Riverside County. Portable telephones will be issued to county residents
who drive and cannot use the roadside call box due to a mobility impairment.
A Request for Proposal is being developed by staff and Legal Counsel and
program guidelines will be drafted for future Board consideration.
12D3. Monthly Call Box Update.
Overview
The operational statistics for the Riverside County Motorist Aid Call Box
System for the month of October, 1993, are presented to the SAFE Board.
Page 8
December 8, 1993
12E. Consent Calendar - Financial Items.
12E1. Draft of Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
Overview
Our auditors, Ernst & Young, have completed the draft of the financial
statements and related disclosure information.
12E2. Quarterly Financial Reports.
Overview
The data depicts the Combining Statements of Revenues and Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balances and the Cost & Schedule reports for the Quarter
Ended September 30, 1993. Also enclosed are the RCTC Measure A Highway
Projects Budget Report by Route, Contract Commitment and Amendments
Report for the month ending October 31, 1993.
12F. Consent Calendar - Commuter Rail.
Fiscal Impact of the Delay in Start -Up of the Metrolink Orange County Line.
Overview
Staff has prepared a memorandum regarding the rescheduling of Orange County's
commuter rail service and how it affects services in other counties.
13. CLOSED SESSION.
14. ADJOURNMENT.
= - _-= \
-" - V`
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMIVIISSION
December 8, 1993
TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM: Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Commission
SUBJECT: LETTERS RECEIVED RELATING ROUTE 79 PUBLIC HEARING
The following letters were received by staff concerning the public hearing scheduled for
the Commission's December 8, 1993 meeting. Summary of the letters are as follows:
WILLIAM E. AND MARY A. DANIEL, 14250 S. BEAUMONT AVENUE
Their concerns relates to: 1) the proposed right of way is twice the ultimate width
proposed in July 1992 and more more than twice the right-of-way directly north of
their property; 2) access and egress to their driveway is not addressed; and, 3)
address replacement/relocation of fencing.
2. LEILA MAY DANIEL, 170 LAMB CANYON ROAD
Same comments as above. She will be represented by William E. Daniel at the
meeting.
3. MARJORIE BAKER, 40166 GRAND AVENUE
Letter is to notify the Commission of intent to be at the meeting.
4. MR. & MRS. DAVID KWON, PARCEL NOS. 421-17-025, 026, 035, 036
Will be represented by Gordon Thomson at the meeting.
nk
Attachments
November 26, 1993
Jack Reagan, Executive Director
Riverside County Transportation Commission
3560 University Avenue
Riverside, Calif 92501
Re: Widening and Realignment of Highway 79
Dear Mr. Reagan:
We are in receipt of your notice of a hearing on the
commencement of eminant domain proceedings against us
regarding the acquisition of our property for the widening
and realignment of State Highway 79.
We have some serious reservations concerning this
project:
1) Excessive width of the proposed Right of Way which
is more than twice the "ultimate" width proposed
at the meeting held in July 1992 and more than twice
the Right of Way on the property directly north of
ours.
2) Access and egress to our driveway is not addressed
at all on any maps or in written communication we
have received from your department. (Currently, we
are the only property owners who actually live on
property affected by this project and whose only
access is to Highway 79). We are concerned about
the safety of leaving and entering a major highway
from our driveway.
3) The replacement or relocation of our existing fence
to ensure the containment of our livestock and
protection of our property and other animals is not
addressed or even mentioned.
We will certainly be at the hearing on December 8 to
voice these concerns and others. We are not opposed to
widening Highway 79 (in fact we think it is long overdue).
We are also willing to sell our fair share of property
needed for this very necessary project, however, we are not
willing to sell more property than is realistically
necessary or have our other concerns ignored.
in erely yours,
/4 i -4, - - - - - -- > _ - , . C../ -_-_-_____--
-�
William E. Daniel Mary A. Daniel
Property Owners: 14250 S. Beaumont Av
November 26, 1993
Jack Reagan, Executive Director
Riverside County Transportation Commission
3560 University Avenue
Riverside, Calif 92501
Re: Widening and Realignment of Highway 79
Dear Mr. Reagan:
I am in receipt of your notice of a hearing on the
commencement of eminant domain proceedings against me
regarding the acquisition of my property for the widening
and realignment of State Highway 79.
I am concerned about the excessive width of the
proposed Right of Way which is more than twice the
"ultimate" width proposed at the meeting held in July 1992.
Access to the driveway at 170 Lamb Canyon Road which
crosses Highway 79 is not addressed at all on any maps or In
written communication I have received from your department.
I am concerned about the safety of leaving and entering a
major highway from my driveway.
I would also like to know about the rplacement or
relocation of my existing fence.
My interests will be represented at the hearing by my
son William E. Daniel. He will voice these concerns and
others. I am not opposed to widening Highway 79 (in fact I
think it is long overdue).
Sincerely yours,
Leila May Daniel ..'?
Property Owner: 170 Lamb Canyon Rd
"v�
r
/7 4: a -e---Pra,
TR;`iSt }}
fib , 2172.2&2
i
J
GORDON THOMSON
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS & DEVELOPMENT
or -
Jack Reagan
Executive Director
Riverside County Transportation Commission
3560 University Avenue
Riverside, Ca. 92501
Dear Mr.Reagan,
As the representative of Mr.& Mrs David Kwon I will be
attending the hearing on December 8th to address their
concerns regarding the proposed acquisition of their
property assessor parcel nos.421-17-025,026,035 & 036.
Sincerely
Gordon Thomson
Te1:909 674 7403
LAW OFFICES OF
BEST, BEST & KRIEGER
Date:
Dec 93
Local Agency:
MEMORANDUM
(Government Code Section 54956.9)
This local agency may meet in closed session to confer
with or receive advice from legal counsel regarding pending
litigation when discussion in open session would prejudice the
agency's position in the litigation. Litigation is pending when
any of the following exists:
"(a) An adjudicatory proceeding before a court,
administrative body exercising its adjudicatory authority, hearing
officer, or arbitrator, to which the local agency is a party, has
been initiated formally.
(b) (1) A point has been reached where, in the opinion
of the legislative body of the local agency on the advice of its
legal counsel, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is
a significant exposure to litigation against the local agency; or
(2) Based on existing facts and circumstances, the
legislative body of the local agency is meeting only to decide
whether a closed session is authorized pursuant to paragraph (1) of
this subdivision.
(c) Based on existing facts and circumstances, the
legislative body of the local agency has decided to initiate or is
deciding whether to initiate litigation."
DH73387
This agency should meet in closed session as follows:
I. Pursuant to subsection (a) above; the title of the
litigation is (ZC`l-c v , ( Q S +-5NL;�
II. Pursuant to subsection (b)(1) above, the agency
bears a significant exposure to litigation because
of these facts and circumstances
LAW OFFICES OF
BEST, BEST & KRIEGER
III. Pursuant to subsection (b)(2) above; the agency is
meeting to decide whether a (b) (1) closed session is
authorized.
IV. Pursuant to subsection (c) above; the agency is
deciding whether to initiate litigation, based on
these existing facts and circumstances:
* Prior to holding this closed session the agency
identified the litigation to be discussed,
or
Prior to holding this closed session, the agency stated
that identifying the litigation to be discussed would
jeopardize ability to serve process or existing
settlement negotiations.
Submitted by Best, Best & Krieger
( D !-� )
DH73387
CZ
City Attorneys
Agency Counsel
Special Counsel
DATE December 8, 1993
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
SIGN -IN -SHEET
NAME
-/--/-.2(;/- .1 /72 ck,(:..e
'ILivt) (v'v
" Ar\.; 1 ‹,
4.1 1°"'C' ,i' !i1,4-:.,-
,V, ,
(.°
r`j 171-LtekL,- ;1/4) I, 1,0
5CA-U. iek../LO (11
REPRESENTING PHONE
L, /:\ Ow;
t:c?,
V" „
3 t 9 z
'
DATE December 8, 1993
(L
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
SIGN -IN -SHEET
c 16;4) r
A t-t, A-% 40 �s
r(4.17itylr j,)/C 67:7'62)
REPRE ENTING PHONE
77 i
7/ die -/ 7
•
A/Vyi j , < 7,
Rub
7 (g -- 2 2. 1/4/)--
�3-;z3 j�
'j3 —�
BB.- k - Cor. miss! aN CDON:fL 6P61y.9)
(%C: (Gt/lc� y `� /i,f)47
ftcr- cw