HomeMy Public PortalAbout05 May 12, 1993 CommissionRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, MAY 12, 1993
2:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
The minutes of the March 31, 1993 joint RCTC/RTA meeting and the April 14, 1993 Commission
meeting will be presented for approval.
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS.
4. AGENDA NOTICES/REVISIONS.
5. PUBLIC HEARING -PROPOSED FY 1993/94 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION, MEASURE A, SERVICE FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES BUDGET.
Overview
Staff has developed the preliminary operational and capital budgets for fiscal year ending June
30, 1994. There are a number of projects and policies that need to be revisited in light of our
debt capacity constraints. A public hearing is scheduled at this meeting. Staff recommends
deferral of adoption of the budgets to the June 9th meeting.
6, GENERAL ITEMS.
6A. Information Item on the Development of a Significant Amendment to the Southern Califomia
Association of Governments FY 1993-99 Regional Transportation Improvement Program.
Overview
Mr. Eric Roth of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) will provide
a briefing on the development of an amendment to SCAG's FY 1993-99 Regional
Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) to the Commission on May 12, 1993. This
item was continued from the April 14, 1993 meeting.
• Map and directions attached
Page 2
6B. Economic Stimulus Report
Overview
Commission staff will present to the Commission an oral report on the current status of
President Clinton's proposed Economic Stimulus Program, if any.
7. FINANCIAL ITEMS.
7A. Ernst & Young 92/93 Audit Engagement Letter.
Overview
Ernst & Young, as instructed by the Commission last year, has been retained for the
Commission's 92/93 Fiscal Year end audit. They have submitted to the Commission an
engagement letter for the upcoming audit along with their fee quote. Ernst & Young
estimates that it will take a total of 4,235 person hours to complete the audit at a cost of
$316,400 plus estimated expenses of up to $44,950.
7B. Measure A Recipient Policies.
Overview
Ernst & Young issued its management letter dated September 25, 1992, recommending
the adoption of various policies for TDA and Measure A recipients. Staff has drafted
several policy statements to address those recommendations.
8. TRANSIT/RIDESHARE/PARK-N-RIDE.
8A. 1993-94 Local Transportation Fund Estimate.
Overview
This year the county estimates that Local Transportation Fund revenues for 1993-94 will
be $24,190,000. Commission staff concurs with the estimate and have included it in the
attached 93/94 LTF Apportionment Schedule. The Commission is now required by law
to annually approve the apportionment of LTF funds prior to specific allocations being
made to claimants.
8B. Unmet Transit Needs Hearing Testimony and Responses.
Overview
Summaries of the testimony from the Palm Desert, Perris and Riverside hearings, the
written comments received and the proposed staff/operator responses, as well as
recommendations, will be included in the Commission agenda packet. The Citizens
Advisory Committee/Social Services Transportation Advisory Council reviewed this
information at their meeting of April 26, 1993.
Page 3
8C. Future Role of CTS, Inc. as a Regular Rideshare Agency.
Overview
Staff is seeking guidance from the Commission regarding the development of regional
transportation demand management (TDM) core services to be performed by Commuter
Transportation Services, Inc. (CTS) as the regional rideshare agency for the Los Angeles
Basin counties. Ca!trans and the county transportation commissions are participating in
a series of discussions regarding the future role and structure of CTS in relationship to
other entities, both public and private, providing TDM services in the region.
9. HIGHWAYS/LOCAL STREETS & ROADS.
9A. Route 86 Update.
Overview
Staff will provide an update of the Route 86 wetlands issues.
9B. 1-215 Tier l Cessation.
Overview
This is a continuation of Item 10C from the March 10, 1993 Agenda. Three options
concerning proceeding with or terminating the Tier I study for the Ultimate 10 lane
Alternative on 1-215 and the 60/91/1-215 Interchange will be discussed with possible action
by the Commission to terminate further activity on the Tier I environmental process.
9C. Proposed Program for the Transportation Activities Enhancement (TEA) Accelerated Cycle.
Overview
Proposed projects for the ISTEA Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA) Program
have been submitted for the accelerated cycle. Recommendations are included in the
Commission agenda.
9D. Measure A Interchange Program - 'Job Development'
Overview
The Measure A Expenditure Plan identified a program specifically to provide a portion of
the funds needed to construct 'new' interchanges in the Western County Area to help
develop additional commercial and industrial jobs in the area. The Measure A Plan
specified a $20 million program in which Measure A would provide $10 million to be
matched by local funds, primarily expected to be funded by developers of the land where
access is improved. A preliminary list was developed and presented to the Commission
last year. The Commission approved a tentative list of Tier I (fundable) and Tier 11
(currently unfundable) projects, and funding for the development of Project Study Reports
as required by Caltrans.
Page 4
10. COMMUTER RAIL
10A. Site Planning Study for Perris Rail Station Properties.
Overview
ICF Kaiser has prepared a proposal for a study of the RCTC properties acquired from
Santa Fe in the City of Perris. The study will include planning for commuter rail station,
museum, and potential commercial development.
10B. County Flood Control Letter on Fees for San Jacinto Branch Line Easements.
Overview
The Commission adopted policies at the April Commission meeting on license requests
and fees for the San Jacinto Branch line. The Riverside County Flood Control District has
expressed some concern and has written an open letter to the Commission outlining
those concerns. Amendment to the policies are being brought forward to the
Commission for discussion and possible action.
11. CONSENT CALENDAR — All matters of the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single
motion unless a Commission member requests separate action on specific Items.
11 A. Consent Calendar - General Items.
11A1. Legislation.
Overview
This is a monthly status report of transportation related legislative issues prepared
by Will Kempton of D.J. Smith Associates, the Commission's legislative
consultant. In addition, Chairman Al Lopez has requested that AB 1035 Rail
Transit Safety Act be submitted to WRCOG and CVAG for support.
11 A2. Congestion Pricing Opinion Research Study.
Overview
Staff is requesting authorization from the Commission to manage the
'Comprehensive Congestion Pricing Opinion Research Study, to issue a Request
for Proposal, and make recommendation regarding awarding the contract.
11 A3. Commissioner(s) Reports.
Overview
Commissioner Al Lopez attended the American Public Transit Association (APTA)
1993 Commuter Rail Conference on April 19, 1993. A summary and presentation
materials are enclosed. Also enclosed is a report by Commissioner Jaffy on the
APTA Legislative Conference on March 6th.
Page 5
11 A4. Upcoming Conferences
Overview
Upcoming APTA Conferences are presented to the Commission.
11 B. Consent Calendar - Financial Items.
1161. Cost and Schedule Reports for the Month of April.
Overview
The data enclosed depicts the current costs and schedule status of contracts
reported by Routes, commitments, and Cooperative Agreements executed by the
Commission. For each contract and Agreement, the report lists the authorized
value approved by the Commission, percentage of contract amount expended to
date, and the project expenditures by route for the month ending March 31,1993.
11 B2. Revision to lmprest Cash Account Procedures.
Overview
Staff is recommending revisions to the Imprest Cash Account Policies and
Procedures that will allow for small project expenditures of less than $5,000 and
grant the Executive Director the authority to expand the list of signatures.
1163. Special Event Account
Overview
Staff is requesting that the Commission authorize the establishment of an account
for sponsorship of special events in order to comply with accounting
requirements.
11 C. Consent Calendar - Transit/Rideshare/Park-n-Ride.
11 C1. FY 1993-94 FTA Section 9 and Section 18 Programs.
Overview
Annually, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) through its Section 18 Program,
provides operating assistance funds for rural transit operators, and through its
Section 9 Program, distributes federal operating and capital block grant funds to
urbanized areas. In order for grants from these funds to be approved, the
Commission must develop a Program of Projects for each area, hold a public
hearing on the programs, and approve the programs.
Page 6
11 C2. Resolution No. 93-011, 'A Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation
Commission Approving Memoranda of Understanding with Sunl? Ine Transit
Agency and Riverside Transit Agency in Connection with a Transit Vehicle
Acquisition Financing Program' to Allocate FTA Section 9 and TDA Funding for
Debt Service Payments on Certificates of Participation.
Overview
RTA and SunLine intend to issue Certificates of Participation to finance the
purchase of buses secured by FTA Section 9 grants. Since the Commission is
the body responsible for approval of FTA Section 9 funding and also allocates
Transportation Development Act Funds, both transit operator's ability to obtain
the needed debt financing is dependent upon their entering into a Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) which would require continued approval and allocation
of the funds by the Commission of up to $2,000,000.
11 C3. FY 1992-93 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program - Extension Request
from City of Calimesa.
Overview
The City of Calimesa was allocated $2,212 of FY 1992-93 SB 821 funds for the
construction of a bikeway on Calimesa Boulevard. Approximately 550 feet of
Calimesa Boulevard is scheduled to be widened in the immediate future, and the
City is requesting a four month extension to complete the Calimesa Boulevard
Bikeway project.
11 C4. FY 1992-93 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program - Extension Request
from City of Riverside.
Overview
The City of Riverside was allocated $97,300 of FY 1992-93 SB 821 funds for the
construction of various bikeways and sidewalk projects. The City is requesting
a twelve month extension to June 30, 1994, to complete all of its FY 1992-93 SB
821 projects.
11 D. Consent Calendar - Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE).
11 D1. Request for Bid Proposal - Freeway Service Patrol Tow Truck Service.
Overview
The Riverside County Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies advertised a
Request for Bid Proposal to contract for tow truck service to implement a
'demonstration' Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) program on selected freeway
segments or beats in Riverside County. Bids were due and opened on Friday,
April 16, 1993. A selection panel reviewed the bids for completeness and
responsiveness, performed site visits on selected firms, and will recommend or.e
firm per beat to provide tow truck service for the Riverside County FSP program.
Page 7
1 D2. Monthly Call Box Update.
Overview
The operational statistics for the Riverside County Motorist Aid Call Box System
for the month of March 1993 are presented to the SAFE Board.
11 E. Consent Calendar - Hiahways/Local Streets & Roads
11 E1. Surface Transportation Program — Formula Program.
Overview
Proposed projects for the Surface Transportation Program (STP) Formula
Program have been submitted for Fiscal Years 1992/93, 1993/94 and 1994/95.
The Technical Advisory Committee will meet after the agenda mailing.
Recommendations for a proposed program are included in the Commission
agenda.
11 E2. Acquisition Settlements for the Route 79, Gilman Springs Road to First Street in the
City of Beaumont, Measure A Highway Improvement Project.
Overview
Staff is seeking approval from the Commission to purchase parcel 13168-1 for an
amount of $9,500.
11 E3. Route 74 Environmental Assessment - Amendment Number 3 Adjustment to
Authorized Engineering Science Contract Amount (RCTC Agreement No. RO-91-
22).
Overview
Staff is seeking authorization amend to Engineering Sciences' Contract (RCTC
Agreement No. RO-91-22) for an amount of $50,000 to complete work on the I-
215 to 7th Street project.
11 E4. CVAG Request for RTIP Amendment - Palm Desert People Mover Project.
Overview
The Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) has requested the
Commission to request SCAG to an amend the Regional Transportation
Improvement Program (RTIP) to include the Palm Desert People Mover Project
Phase I, Environmental Assessment and Project Design.
11 E5. Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement Program.
Overview
Proposed projects for the Congestion Management (CMAO) Discretionary
Programs have been submitted for Fiscal Years 1992/93, 1993/94 arid 1994/95.
The STP/CMAQ Review Committee has completed their ratings and
recommendations for a proposed program are included in the agenda.
Page 8
11 E6. Surface Transportation Program - Discretionary Funds.
Overview
Proposed projects for the Surface Transportation Program (STP) Discretionary
Programs have been submitted for Fiscal Years 1992/93, 1993/94 and 1994/95.
The STP/CMAO Review Committee has completed their ratings and
recommendations for a proposed program are included in the agenda.
11 F. Consent Calendar - Commuter Rail.
11 F1. Approval of Amendment No. 1 to Agreement RO9310 with A.L. Burke Engineers
to Perform Phase 2 Preliminary Site investigations for The Pedley Commuter Rail
Station.
Overview
Staff is requesting approval of Amendment No. 1 to Agreement RO9310 with A.L
Burke Engineers to perform Phase 2 Preliminary Site Investigations for the Pedley
Commuter Rail Station for an amount of $8,923.22.
11 F2. Morrison-Knudsen Study on Center Street.
Overview
This item is to consider a contract amendment with Morrison-Knudsen to prepare
alternative alignments for Center Street grade crossings at the Santa Fe tracks
of the San Bernardino Subdivision and the RCTC tracks on the San Jacinto
Subdivision. The fee estimate for the project is $9,869.00.
11 F3. Approval of Contract Amendment for Ninyo & Moore to Complete Phase 2
Preliminary Site Investigations on the San Jacinto Branch Line - Segments 1, 2 and
3 (RCTC Agreement No. 93-19).
Overview
This amendment will be in the amount of $49,317.26 plus 15% contingency
($7,400.00) to cover costs for conducting Phase 2 Preliminary Site Investigations.
11 F4. Commuter Rail Station Security.
Overview
Staff is recommending approval to place a temporary contract with a local private
security firm for provision of security services at commuter rail stations for
operations start up.
Page 9
11 F5. Report on MetroLink Compared with Other Transit Modes
Overview
This is a report prepared by Richard Stanger, Executive Director, MetroLink, to
address public criticisms of the MetroLink system
11 F6. 'National Operation Lifesaver Day' - RCTC Proclamation.
Overview
Operation Lifesaver is an organization which promotes increased public
awareness of rail safety. Due to the increasing level of train operations, both
freight and passenger, in Southern California it is increasingly important to
promote public awareness of rail safety. May 19, 1993 is National Operation
Lifesaver Day and Metrolink is joining with Amtrak, Metropolitan Transportation
Authority (MTA) Santa Fe, Southern Pacific and Union Pacific to symbolize the
spirit of Operation Lifesaver with a historic meeting of trains from each of the
participants at Los Angeles Union Passenger Terminal. The Commission will be
asked to support a proclamation of the RCTC to recognize this event.
12. CLOSED SESSION
13. ADJOURNMENT.
(Parking behind)
C 17"y )(
NR LL
Vicentia
Street
n
�I
Main Street
DIRECTIONS TO CORONA CITY HALL:
From Riverside take 91 South towards Corona.
Get off on Main Street exit and turn left.
Go a few lights down to Sixth Street and turn right.
Go approximately 1 mile to Vicentia Street.
Turn right and then left into first driveway.
Parking is behind the City Hall.
Main Street
(To Corona)
�I
' ITER.OEPAPTMENT4L LETT'E.4
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
May 12, 1993
FilLANKU.N E. 5HFRKow
Dimwr Jf TniripurtilLYI
TO: Supervisor tray Ceniceros
Supervisor Melba Dunlap
Supervisor Corky Lasson7/(
FROM: Franklin S. Sherkow
Director of Transporttion
RE: TOmAT' S RCTC Agenda Comments
(Final Agenda arrived yesterday)
c an#n `jxAmp rtAtion ioandsgitiA. *$$$ufe "'14F.�. kery po for
Freeway Amor,rnclgo findgeTt
Recommend support for Budget and FinanCe COmmitt,ee dnd stelfi
recommendation to deter until June.
Budgat review should begin with policy and priority consideration
by the Commission. Recommend postponing_approval until policy
review is r_Omplated.
comments on Trai5por't'arion i-lannina Goals:
1. Why isn't'. Palo 'horde Valley mentioned?
? Building upon relaiLiut> =hips shook} include to::al etejen^iNti,
not lust COG's.
Local agencies should tie kept _nfOrmed Oi SuCh aCtiv;itie8
and given an opportunity to provide timely input.
4. Support.
5. Support.
Comments on SAFP Coals
1. Support.
2. Support.
1. 7VHS should be more brosdly integrated and planed beyond
tha call box system.
7nnA.T . s ROTC Agenda Comments
Page 2
May 12, 1993
ColltincenLS on Mti23Surc "A" 14;0:way ArogSam Goals:
1. Support, but understand that with the changing regulatory
ervi.:arment, tha "sired -ilia" of projects is relatively
short.
Support, but environmental issuer ;e.g., Gnatcatche_) make
lord -term corridor preservation risky.
3. Strong support.
4. Strong Support.
5. Good luck.
6. Strong support.
7. Support.
6. Strong support.
Comments on Measure -A" Commuter Rail Progress Goals!
1. Strong support.
2. Strong support.
3. Strong support.
4. Strong support.
5. Strong support.
6. Strong support.
Comments on Measure "A" Special Trans ]rtation Progress Goals:
1. Support.
2. Support.
3. Cost-effective strategies only.
TODAY %S ReTC agenda COMMents
Page 3
May 12, 1993
4. Support.
5. Support.
Comments on pleasure "A" Lore) .gi_re-ete Ps2gcj:tb5. noalg:
1. Support-
2. Support _ How?
3. Support . . . HOw?
4. Impact on other Mea:uro "A" projects should be considered.
Goals for pleasure "A" Capital Programs/Commuter Hail - Support
all.
%dale for M as xte "A" Capital Programs f nighways - 44 - We are
OPPOSED to this item. The project would end in unincorporated
area at a difficult area interae'.et. 412 - Highway 111 may be
relocated. Support all others.
WHAT'S NUT DISCUSSED HY STAFF
1. Sow will RCTC shrz out the impendI ng highway/commuter
rail transit funding S'..ratPnies and conflicts in Measure
.A'?
2. when will RuTC and Caltrans agree on park-n-ride needs and
standards 93 that local land use approval agencies can begin
to Condition projects accordingly? Tf this can save RCTC
from buying park-r:-ride lots, can a policy be developed to
create an incentive for local agencies to onditiun
developers for such lots?
hownda Item #aA - Informat.on Item on the Devel9pment of a
Z flt-anr Amendment to the Southern Cali.fornio Anaocietion of
Goviazni FY 1993 ,99 Roqinaal Tr 06rtat4-on 1mPravemenr.
Pnier-Am
Recommend aLiTort. However, lOcs1 juri6dititlone citieA And
counties; should also be informed by RCTC abort "non-exempt vs.
exempt." definitions.
rSkUd4 Its 7A ErtilSt k Young 92193 Audit EngasemcntLetter
Recommend support.
TODAY'S ROTC Agenda Comments
Pago 4
May 12, 1993
Aqonda_ Itam. #7 1 - 101. a8ure "A" IWipiant e21i2iea
As suggested by the Board cf Supervisors, we recommend that
allocations, once rude, not be reduced during the year.
Adjustments can be made IA subgerp,ent yemr. i. Otherwise,
support.
Agenda its _#84. - a9”.714 Local Trahm2ortation Fri Petimate
Recommend support.
Will the unapper-t_cned carryover `rnm the western county local
street program (if any; be available for local titreet, and roads?
7t should!
Agenda Itsat_111E - Unmet, Il`=s s ilt Rewe s"G'ea ri na meet ace ir
.±nsl
Recommend support.
Agenda iteajgc _— Future Role of CPS_ Inc_ as a, R • . 14r
Rideshare Agency
Recommend support,
Amanda Item 192 - I-215 Tier I Cessation
Recommend support.
Agad i i3 7tt L A - _Proposed ed Pro4ram for the Tran4parta:. i o
Act ivit Enhacemen_ 7RA .Accelcrattt �vr_iQ
These projects should be ranked, and IICTC should Liss` Lh t r
ranking on to C't'C: and C;altrans .
Cities of Riverside and Indio have requeSted d.i.spropertiorately
high dollar antounta ,
Agenda rt 211_ - Aogry "A" Inter=.han2t Fr alai .. " .c2l
nevel4vlent "
Recommend support.
Agenda Ttem #in_A h. its Flares grud;s for PerrA6 Rail Station
prone 'tim
Recommend support.
TQDfj►Y'$ RCTC Agenda Comments
Page 5
Hay 12, 1993
A9etkda Me m # 1 GR - County F i ood Control tott9t on Pe.eg f Or San
j4qipto Branch Line Batsgwnto
Support Budget and Finance Committee and staff recommendation.
hotada_ teem C11 C P -- All matters of the rnn .eBr
Calendar will be approv0 in a sin le motion =law a '-5ommi� e4-_IQA
m -vesta separate action_ ?n specific items,
Please Pull:
Agenda Item i 11i?5 -
Tpkornwlale,ant Prngram
Recommend vapp0rt of
correct oronect 1144;
_Congestion Mitigation {a hir Quality
sluff raionur�ancla�ion, �$i1L�Y'i' Ply?£'=
t:J GE3�' � y dpnGte Ti'y'I'%' AoOleCt3
Agiginda It:61# 111S6 - aurs4pe 1Tangportation Frocram -
Recommend that the full Commission examine the staff
recommendation at meeting and offer the Pal c=r Subcommitt�C
aay.. guidan t for their meeting.
Staf f_Recomnie aticxx
41 Yes.
#2 Projecte baud on merit within reasonable limits;
ir does not have to be strictly equity shares.
43 if desert cities didn't care to apply, they should
wait until next year.
#4 Yes.
Otter Gents
1` pOpulation-base's equity policy is adopted, the joint
Signal project* between the County and indio, and
between the County and Palm Desert should be split
equally between the citiea and county.
FESshb
Supervisor Younglove
Lary Parrish, CAC)
John Johnson, eU
Tek Tanaka
Lou Gamache/Ed studcr
Jack Reagan, RCTC
LAW OFFICES OF
BEST, BEST & KRIEGER
Date:
Local Agency:
MEMORANDUM
(Government Code Section 54956.9)
This local agency may meet in closed session to confer
with or receive advice from legal counsel regarding pending
litigation when discussion in open session would prejudice the
agency's position in the litigation. Litigation is pending when
any of the following exists:
"(a) An adjudicatory proceeding before a court,
administrative body exercising its adjudicatory authority, hearing
officer, or arbitrator, to which the local agency is a party, has
been initiated formally.
(b) (1) A point has been reached where, in the opinion
of the legislative body of the local agency on the advice of its
legal counsel, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is
a significant exposure to litigation against the local agency; or
(2) Based on existing facts and circumstances, the
legislative body of the local agency is meeting only to decide
whether a closed session is authorized pursuant to paragraph (1) of
this subdivision.
(c) Based on existing facts and circumstances, the
legislative body of the local agency has decided to initiate or is
deciding whether to initiate litigation."
This agency should meet in closed session as follows:
I. Pursuant to subsection (a) above; the title of the
litigation is
II. Pursuant to subsection (b)(1) above, the agency
bears a significant exposure to litigation because
of these facts and circumstances
LAW OFFICES OF
BEST, BEST & KRIEGER
K
III. Pursuant to subsection (b)(2) above; the agency is
meeting to decide whether a (b) (1) closed session is
authorized.
IV. Pursuant to subsection (c) above; the agency is
deciding whether to initiate litigation, based on
these existing fac s and circumstances
/. 1 T_
i
i
* Prior to holding this closed session the agency
identified the litigation to be discussed,
or
Prior to holding this closed session, the agency stated
that identifying the litigation to be discussed would
jeopardized ability to serve process or existing
settlement negotiations.
Submitted by Best, Best & Krieger
( SC )
DMV28497
City Attorneys
Agency Counsel
Special Counsel
DATE May 12, 1993
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
SIGN —IN —SHEET
NAME
(7'61r
___-%-e/k0 Lc)
/C't
C
i ice' "4:Lcr-,
1/1/
r
04)-
(-114/it-
A
,
(2-
veoS
7-7,1 Sc,r+-\
REPRESENTING
c.}/4
C Pf
&eta -
(Ai
IYO trifi e
0,02-eq
, ,,--7kK7fcx-) 549 st-,?,E2z
PHONE
.S?3-
7r--- L74-0
--//-2
(0 '1 TEtZ- - 117
2 (4- dfr3
?c,ei --Jr»--/-7({7
/6q- 67c-6
C ck- 14 a 4 )-
t
Cct S
g6?
7er7 7`2--‘/,‘)
ye, 9- 4/22 d G kr
009) —1-r_S' _3 - 3,2 63
C '707 A-2—SY? 6,