Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2022-63 Authorizing to issue a work order to Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. for the planning and preparation of 30% design documents for the Crandon Bouevard Capital ProjectRESOLUTION NO. 2022- 63 A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF KEY BISCAYNE, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE MANAGER TO ISSUE A WORK ORDER TO STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. FOR THE PLANNING AND PREPARATION OF 30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR THE CRANDON BOULEVARD CAPITAL PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $222,296; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on November 1, 2021, the Village of Key Biscayne (the "Village") entered into a continuing professional service agreement with Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (the "Consultant") for continuing architectural and engineering services; and WHEREAS, the Village desires to develop a holistic and comprehensive design for Crandon Boulevard within the Village's jurisdictional limits to improve the mobility, connections, safety, and functionality of the corridor by better accommodating all users on the right-of-way (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, on October 11, 2022, the Village Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-54, approving a Municipal Planning Matching Grant Agreement (the "Grant") with the Miami -Dade Transportation Planning Organization in the amount of $90,000 for the Project; and WHEREAS, to utilize Grant funds, the Village must commit to providing a minimum local share of 20%; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has provided a proposal, attached hereto as Exhibit "A," (the "Proposal") to provide conceptual planning and preparation of 30% documents (the "Services") for the Project in an amount of $222,296; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Grant requirements, the Village intends to fund the Project by utilizing $90,000 (44.5%) of Grant funds and a $132,296 (55.5%) local match; and WHEREAS, the Village Council desires to authorize the Village Manager to issue a work order to the Consultant for the Services in an amount not to exceed $222,296, consistent with the Proposal, attached hereto as Exhibit "A," and the continuing professional services agreement entered into between the Village and Consultant; and WHEREAS, the Village Council finds that this Resolution is in the best interest and welfare of the residents of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF KEY BISCAYNE, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. That each of the above -stated recitals are hereby adopted, confirmed, and incorporated herein. Section 2. Authorization. The Village Manager is hereby authorized to issue a work order to the Consultant for the Services consistent with the Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and the continuing professional services agreement in an amount not to exceed $222296. Section 3. Effective Date. That this Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED and ADOPTED this 29th day of November 2022. ATTEST: ou2s...arP) JOCELYN B. H VILLAGE CLERK SCO, M .YOR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFI WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN COLE & BIERMAN, P.L. VILLAGE ATTORNEY Page 2 of 2 C*, Stantec November 22, 2022 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 901 Ponce de Lean Bouievard, Suite 900, Coral Gables FL 33134-3070 Attention: Ms. Colleen Blank, AICP Capital Improvement Program and Grants Manager Village of Key Biscayne 88 W McIntyre St Suite 250 Key Biscayne FL, 33149 cblank a©keybiscayne.fl.gov Dear Ms. Colleen Blank: Reference: Crandon Boulevard Multimodal Corridor Planning and Design We are pleased to present this proposal for professional consulting services for the Crandon Boulevard Multimodal Corridor Planning and Design. We understand that the Village of Key Biscayne completed the Strategic Vision Plan which identified potential enhancements to the Crandon Boulevard corridor within the Village limits. The project corridor is approximately 1.4 miles in length. The project purpose is to improve mobility, connections, safety, and functionality of the corridor to better accommodate all users of the right of way including pedestrians, scooters, personal vehicles, buses, shuttles, golf carts, and cyclists. This proposal includes the conceptual planning and preparation of 30% design documents. Included in this proposal are the scope of services, deliverables, schedule, exclusions, and fee estimate. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Scope of Services for this traffic study includes the following tasks: 1.0 Phase 1 - Concept Development The CONSULTANT will conduct a planning effort to assess existing conditions: identify, develop, and evaluate conceptual alternatives; and conduct public engagement. The objective of this task is to identify a preferred alternative for the design phase (Task 2/Phase2). This task includes the following activities: • Kick-off meeting between project team and the Village of Key Biscayne • Monthly team meetings and progress reports • Existing Conditions analysis • Review existing data, plans and information, and identify data gaps • Perform traffic data collection activities based on the agreed upon data gaps and study requirements ■ Conduct field review to provide a qualitative assessment of the existing conditions • Review and summarize previously completed safety study • Using traffic data provided by the Village, estimate Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) at each intersection approach; determine the AM and PM Peak hour intersection turning movement volumes; balance network; and check for reasonableness ■ Perform intersection operational analysis for the signalized intersections and locations with high -emphasis crosswalks (6 signalized intersections and 7 unsignalized intersections) during the AM and PM peak periods, and identify potential storage bay deficiencies from the queueing results, and potential crosswalk timing improvements Design with community in mind November 22, 2022 Page 2 of 4 Reference: Crandon Boulevard Multimodal Corridor Planning and Design • Using the intersection operational analysis results, identify potential storage bay deficiencies from the queuing results Perform a qualitative multi -modal analysis based on the demand from the data provided by the Village of Key Biscayne, which is anticipated to include pedestrians, bicyclists, and golf carts • Identify, develop, and evaluate three (3) Build Alternatives Develop traffic study methodology Estimate future traffic volumes using a growth rate based on historical traffic data from nearby traffic count stations, balance volumes, and check for reasonableness Conduct future operational analysis for the signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections with high -emphasis crosswalks (6 signalized intersections and 7 unsignalized intersections) for the AM and PM peak periods for two alternatives (No -Build and one build intersection treatment) Identify design criteria Develop one typical section for each Build Alternatives Develop conceptual design for the Budd Alternatives from a plan view perspective Identify potential safety enhancements Estimate costs for each alternative using cost per mile models • Public Meeting presenting the results for the Build Alternatives Consultant responsibilities creating one typical section rendering for each alternative, creating and formatting graphical collaterals (i.e., base map and plan view of corridor, tables), review presentation that is prepared by Village, briefing the Village, and participating in the meeting Consultant assumes that the public meetings will be held at Village Council, the Village will notify the community, and debrief will be part of a regularly monthly progress meeting • Phase 1 Concept Development Report will be concisely describe the existing conditions analysis, evaluation of build alternatives, four (4) additional typical section renderings for the preferred alternative, results from the public meeting, and recommendations for the selection of the preferred alternative 2.0 Phase 2 - Final Concept Refinement (30% Design) The CONSULTANT will develop the 30% design documents based on the preferred alternative identified from Phase 1. This task includes the following activities. • Design phase project general tasks such as contract maintenance and project documentation, project management meetings, and coordination with Miami -Dade Transportation and Public Works for potential bus stop modifications • Roadway analysis including horizontal/vertical design, cross section design, design report, and cost estimates • Roadway plans including key sheet, typical sections, plan/profile sheets, intersection layout details,, and cross sections • Drainage analysis and plans such as drainage map, design of stormwater management facility, and drainage design documentation, and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) sheets • Identify project phasing for implementation Design wim community in mine November 22, 2022 Page3of4 Reference: Crandon Boulevard Multirnodal Corridor Planning and Design DELIVERABLES The following deliverables will be included with this project: • Traffic Study Methodology • Phase 1 Concept Development Report • 30% design documents including CADD files PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE A preliminary milestone schedule has been prepared and is presented below. Maor Task ti --I ,.. q/ -,T11. �, PHASE 1 - CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Existing Coonditions Analysis Build Alternatives _ Public Engagement Summary Report PHASE 2 - FINAL CONCEPT REFINEMENT (30% DESIGN) 30% Design Phase Note: This is an preliminary schedule which will depend on continuous coordination and timely response by the Village and other stakeholders EXCLUSIONS • Presentations to Village Council • Standalone Existing Conditions Report (existing conditions analysis included in the Concept Development Report) • Survey of the Project Area • Travel demand model validation • Geotechnical investigations • Presentations to Miami -Dade Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) committees • Preparation of design variation and exceptions package • Environmental analysis and identification of permitting needs CONTRACT FEE The contract fee is provided in the table below. Service Fee Fee Type Phase 1 — Concept Development $ 80,084.00 Hourly not to Exceed Phase 1 — Traffic Data Collection $ 20,000.00 Hourly not to Exceed Phase 2 — Final Concept Refinement (30% Design) $ 102,003.00 Hourly not to Exceed Subtotal $ 202,087.00 Contingency (10%) $ 20,208.70 Hourly not to Exceed Grand Total $ 222,295.70 Design with community in mind November 22, 2022 Page 4 of 4 Reference: Crandon Boulevard Multimodal Corridor Planning and Design TERMS AND CONDITIONS The terms and conditions are based on the executed agreement for the Village of Key Biscayne Continuing Professional Services Agreement dated November 1, 2021. CLOSING STATEMENT Should you have any questions, or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me, or the Project Manager — Chris Benitez at 305-445-2900 and chris.benitez@stantec.com. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Lui Diaz, PE S for Principal, Transportation (407) 585-0157 luis.diaz@stantec.cam Attachment A: Fee Est mate Design with community in mind Stantec ATTACHMENT A Fee Estimate Design with community in mind Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 901 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 900, Coral Gables FL 33134-3070 Fee Shoat -Prime TASK 1 - PBASE 1 CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATE OF WORK EFFORT AND COST Name of Project County FPN. FAP No,: Staff (.7aau6catiod Total Staff Henri From ,Sl1 Summary Fare Project Mangier Contract Manager Chief Davin... Motu, PmJd Engineer Senior Ylaao Seainr Prairrt Engineer Senior Eaginrer hstera graft LZaaeillcaan. 0er Staff Cleari0vati,va. Staff Clualflcatima 010 try Aru.ity Salary Cue, 0y Arri.it5 Average Ralf Per Taal: 0197.00 020500 0115.00 87500 9150.00 0156, 5p S180.00 384.00 50.00 0t((5 5000 Talc 1 - Phase 1 545 38 3 109 10 199 145 56 21 0 0 it 54.5 545 $65064 5 (46 94 Total Staff Hours 545 58 3 109 10 199 109 56 21 0 0 0 Total Staff Cost 07,416 00 5615.00 512,53500 0751.00 529.950.00 517004 00 010.080.00 11,764.00 30.00 $0.00 50.00 999,584.00 5149.94 Crandon Boulevard Multonodal Plante and Design - Task 1 - Phase 1 Concept Development Miami -Dade NIA N/A Consult. Name: Consult. No. Date Estimator Stamen Consulting Services. Inc TBD 10112/2022 Chia Benitez SALARY RELATED COSTS: Traffic Data Collection GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE: Fanou an 080,004.00 $20,000 00 S1K0S4.00 Task 1 - Phase 1 Concept Estimator Chris Benitez Crandon Boutevard Multimodal Planning and Design - Task 1 - Phase 1 Concept Development N/A Task No. Task Units # of Units Hours / Unit Hours Comments NOTE: • subject toQC 1 Project Management Monthly team meetings and contract setup LS 1 16 Includes initial project folder setup = 4 hours; monthly updates = 2 hours per month x 6 months Krcwoirmeeang LS 1 5 1 virtual meeting = (3 staff x 2 hour meeting(+ 2 our prep + 1 hour notes Subtotal 25 2 Existing Conditions analysis Review or Previous studies and data LS 1 10 Village of Key Biscayne Strategic Vision Plan, Traffic Circulation Study, review roadway as-builtlCADD files; existing Right of Way GIS data; download aerials, identify data gaps in the traffic data that is provided, assist Village with data request from State Park. Traffic dare Ls 1 0 To be completed by a subconsultart. Traffic data collection estimate included in the fee sheet Traffic dale needs will be determined based on the data gap analysis, study requirements, and coordination with the Village. Field Review LS 1 s 2 staff x (2 hrs field review + 2 hours travel)'Conduct during one peak hour, depending on recommendation from the Village staff _ Review Satiety Anatysls LS t 2 Review from previously completed safety analysis Existing Traffic Analysis LS i 36 Assess existing traffic data to estimate AADT, identify a corridor -wide AM and PM peak hour, and extract AM and PM peak hour intersection volumes for analysis = 10 hours; Using Synchro or HCS (AM and PM peak hour analysis for one future year as determined with the Village) -Signalized analysis (AM and PM peak hour analysis) = 2 hours x 6 signalized intersections = 12 hours: -unsignalized intersection analysis = 1.5 hour x 7 unsignslized locations = 10.5 hours; crosswalk timing assessment and recommendations far the 6 signalized intersections = 3 hours Note. Signalized intersections include. Ocean Lane Dr, Key Colony, Sanesta Dr, Galen Dr. E ft W Wood Dr, W Mashta Dr Unslgnalized intersections include: E Heather Cr, Grand Bay Dr. Sunrise Dr/W Enid Dr, E Enid Dr, Seaview Dr, Grspetree:Dr Muni -modal analysis LS r d Review demand data and conduct qualitative muff -modal analysis of the activity = 4 hours Existing coraiitions Report Ls r a Existing conditions analysis will be included as part of the Concept Development Report instead of standalone existing conditions report Subtotal 66 3 Build Alternatives Tree's. Study Methodology LS 1 12 Develop draft methodology far review by the Village and Miami -Dade County; revise as necessary. Futuna Traffic Volumes LS 1 6 Using historical traffic data from nearby traffic count stations, estimate a traffic demand growth rate = 2 hours; apply to existing traffic demand to calculate future AADT = 2 hours; apply to wasting intersection turning movements and balance and then check for reasonableness = 4 hours NOTE; Future year will be determined based on coordination with the Village Task 1 - Phase 1 Concept Task No. Task Units # of Units Hours 1 Unit Hours Comments Fulure lniersection 7nalyss LS i 99 Using Synchro or HCS, AM and PM peak hour analysis for one future year as determined with the Village, 2 alternatives (1 No -build and 1 Builddntersection improvement) No -Build -Signalized analysis = 1.5 hours x 6 signalized intersections = 9 hours, -unsignalzed intersection analysis = 1 hour x 7 unsignalized locations = 7 hours: Build -Signalized analysis = 2 hoursx 6 signalized intersections = 12 hours, -unsignalized intersection analysis = 1.5 hour x 7 unsignalized locations = 10.5 hours; Note; Signalized intersections include: Dawn Lane Dr, Key Colony, Soneste Dr, Galen Dr. E & W Wood Dr. W Mashta Dr, Unsignallzed intersections include- E Heather Dr, Grand Bay Dr, Sunrise DrNJ Enid Dr, E Enid Dr, Seaview Dr, Grapetree Dr Design criteria LS o 4 Assess design criteria using FDOT Greenback Typical Section is t 12 3 typical sections x4 hours = 12 hours Task 1 - Phase 1 Concept Task No. Task Units tM of Units Hours !Unit (Hours Comments Conceptual Design t_S t 223 Base map ,ra] 200 scale = 3 sheets x 8 hrs./sheet = 24 hours; hon2ontal aligment= 4 hours for 1.4 tulles (assuming that all Build Alternatives will use the same alignment),; concept plans @ 40 scale = 13 sheets x 5 hours x 3 alternatives = 195 hours Ideally polenti81 safety enhancements LS t e Estimate costs LS 24 3 alternatives x 8 hrs using cost per mile as basis Subtotal 328 4 Public Meeting Public Meeting 1 S 1 36 One public meeting one typical section rendering for each alternative = 4 hours x 3 alternative = 12 hours. review presentation (assume two reviews) = 8 hours. create and format other graphical collatorals (i.e.. base map and plan views of the corridor) = 8 hours; briefing the Village = 4 hours. participating in the public meeting = 1 staff x (2 hours participating + 2 hours travel) = 4 hours Subtotal 36 5 Summary Report Summery Report LS 1 - 72 Concise report primarily utilizing tables. figures. butleting of results. Draft = 40 hours; final= 16 hours; 4 additional typical section renderings for the preferred alternative = 4 hours x 4 typical sections = 16 hours Subtotal 72 Subtotal of Task 1 521 Hours Subject to QC 478 Quality Assurance 1 Quality Control I LS _+k. 24 Total 545 TASK 2 - PHASE 2 FINAL CONCEPT REFINEMENT (30% DESIGN) ESTIMATE OF WORK EFFORT AND COST - PRIME CONSULTANT Name of Project: Crandon Boulevard Reconiruotion Consultant Name: Stantec Consulting County: Miami -Dade Consultant No.: TOD FPN: TBD Date: 10/11/2022 FAR No.. N/A _-. Estimator: DesirJac• es Services Inc. Staff Classification _ - Total Staff Hours From "SH Summary- Project Manager Contract Manager Senior Project Engineer Project Engineer Chief Designer Desdgner Staff Classi- fication 7 start Classi- lunation 6 6190 Classi- Hwtaan 9 Stall Classi- (nalion 10 StaN Classi- Ncation 11 Stall Classi- lication 12 SH By Activity Santry Cost By Activity Average Rate Per Task 0197.00 I $205.00 -. 5150.00 9115.00 575.00 -- 10.33 50.00 50.00 00.00 TOAD _ 3. Project General and Project Common Tasks 08 35 3 21 10 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 89 512,790 $105.38 4. Roadway Analysis 375 19 - 0 38 57 94 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 375 542,400 511325 5. Roadway Plans 320 10 0 33 4B 80 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 320 536,217 5113.16 St. Drainage Analysis 40 2 0 4 24 10 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 40 $5,864 5149.60 et. Drainage Plans 40 2 0 4 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 4 40 $4,084 3119.62 Total Staff Hours 344 74 3 10D 147 194 326 3 0 0 0 0 0 804 Total Staff Cost 514,578..00 $815.30 518,000:60 $22,050.03 522 310.00 $24,450.00 00:00 $0.20 $0.02 $0.00 $0.00 00.00 $102„903.00 5720.06 Note: Task numbering is consistent veth FDOT Design Scope of Services task numbering. Check= 6102,003.00 SALARY RELATED COSTS, 5132.003.00 GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE: $102,093.D6 Creed.. 814 - Task 2 - Phase 2 - designs'hefarms_v7.dsa Fee Sheet - Pnme Estimator Crandon Boulevard Recortruction TBD' Representing Print Name Signature/Date FDOT Distract Consultant Name NOTE: Signature Bloch is optional, per District preference TasNo. Task Units No of Units Hours/ Unit Ho Comments 3.1 Public Involvement 3.1,1 Community Awareness Plan LS 1 0 N/A 3.1.2 Notifications LS 1 0 0 NIA 3.1.3 Preparing Maiting Lists LS 1 0 0 NIA 3.1.4 Median Modification Letters LS 1 0 0 NIA 3.1.5 Driveway Modification Letters LS 1 0 0 NIA 3.1.6 Newsletters LS 1 0 0 NIA 3.1.7 Renderings and Fly Throughs LS 1 0 0 N/A 3.1.8 PowerPoint Presentation LS 1 0 0 NIA 3.1.9 Pubic Meeting Preparations LS 1 0 0 N/A 3.1.10 Public Meeting Attendance/Followup LS 1 0 0 N/A 3.1.11 Other Agency Meetings LS 1 0 0 N/A 3.1.12 Web Site LS 1 0 0 N/A 3.1 Public Involvement Subtotal 0 Crandon Blvd - Task 2 - Phase 2 - designshefonns_v3.xlsx 3. Project General Tasks Tas No. Task Units No of Units Hours/ Unit Hours Comments 3.2 Joint Project Agreements EA 0 N/A 3.3 Specifications & Estimates 3.3.1 Specifications Package Preparation LS 1 0 0 NIA 3.3.2 Estimated Quantites Report Preparation Report Calculated Hours 0 0 N/A Components 0 3.4 Contract Maintenance and Project Documentation LS 1 37 This includes project management efforts for complete setup and maintenance of files, electronic folders and documents, progres reports„ schedule updates, and compilation and submittal of project documenation. Initial setup = 20 hours; monthly updates = 3 hours x 3 months = 9 hours; final documentation = 8 hours 3.5 Value Engineering (Multi -Discipline Team) Review LS 1 0 0 N/A 3.6 Prime Consultant Project Manager Meetings LS 1 20 20 See meeting descriptions below 3.7 Plans Update LS 1 0 0 N/A 3.8 Post Design Services LS 1 0 0 N/A 3.9 Digital Delivery LS 1 0 0 3.10 Risk Assessment Workshop LS 1 0 0 NIA 3.11 Railroad, Transit, and/or Airport Coordination LS 1 4 4 Coordination with Miami -Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works (Transit) = 4 hours 3.11.1 Aeronautical Evaluation LS 1 0 0 N/A 3.12 Landscape and Existing Vegetation Coordination LS 1 ., 0 N/A 3.13 Other Project General Tasks LS 1 8 Identify project phasing for implementation 3. Project Common and Pro ect General Tasks Total 69 Crandon Blvd - Task 2 - Phase 2 - designsheforms_v3.xlsx 3, Project General Tasks Task No. Task Units No of Units Hours/ Unit Hoursa Comments 3.6 - List of Project Manager Meetings Units No of Units Hours! Unit Total Hours Comments Roadway Analysis EA 3 2 6 3 virtual meetings Drainage EA 0 0 0 N/A Utilities EA 0 0 0 N/A EA 0 0 0 N/A Structures EA 0 0 0 N/A Signing & Pavement Marking EA 0 0 0 N/A Signalizatior EA 0 0 0 NIA Lighting EA 0 0 0 N/A Landscape Architecture EA 0 0 0 N/A Survey EA 0 0 0 NIA Photogrammetry EA 0 0 0 N/A ROW & Mapping EA 0 0 0 N/A Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR EA 0 0 0 N/A Architecture EA 0 0 0 N/A Noise Barriers EA 0 0 0 N/A ITS Analysis EA 0 0 0 N/A Geotechnical EA 0 0 0 N/A Progress Meetings EA 3 .. 6 Phase Reviews EA 4 4 One phase review meeting with 2 staff x 2 hours each Field Reviews EA 4 1 field review @ 4 hrs by Project Manager (Sheet 4. Roadway Analysis includes field review time for roadway design team) Total Project Manager Meetings 8 20 Total PM Meeting Hours carries to Task 3.6 above Notes: 1. If the hours per meeting vary in length (hours) enter the average in the hourlunit column. 2. Do not double count agency meetings between permitting agencies. 3. Project manager meetings are calculated in each discipline sheet and brought forward to Column D, except for Photogrammetry. Crandon Blvd - Task 2 - Phase 2 - designshefomms_v3xlsx 3. Project General Tasks Estimator: Note: Task numbering is consistent with FDOT Design Scope of Services task numbering. Crandon Boulevard Recontruction TBD Task Task Units No of Units Hours/ Unit Total Hours Comments 4.1 Typical Section Package LS 1 0 0 N/A 4,2 iPavement Type Selection Report LS 1 0 0 NIA 4.3 Pavement Design Package LS 1 0 0 N/A 4.4 Cross -Slope Correction LS 1 0 0 N/A 4.5 Horizontal /Vertical Master Design Files LS 1 300 300 This includes all work to create elements showing the alignment for both horizontal and vertical geometries in plan and profile portion of plan sheets. Use Lower Range Projects: 1.5 mites of rcanstruction,. 200 hours for first mile and 80 hours for the remaining half mile : 220 hrs + 80hrs = 300 hrs 4.6 Access Management LS 1 0 0 N/A 4.7 Roundabout Final Design Analysis LS 1 0 0 N/A 4.8 Cross Section Design Files LS 1 0 0 4.9 Temporary Traffic Control Plan Analysis LS 1 0 0 4.10 Master TTCP Design Files LS 1 0 0 N/A 4.11a Selective Clearing and Grubbing of Existing VegetationField Assessment LS 1 0 0 N/A 4.11b Selective Clearing and Grubbing Site Inventory of Existing Vegetation and Cross -Discipline Coordination (OPTIONAL SERVICES) LS 1 0 N/A d.11C Selective Clearing and Grubbing- Existing Vegetation Maintenance Report LS 1 0 D N/A 4.12 Tree Dlspostion Plan LS 1 0 0 N/A 4.13 Design Variations and Exceptions LS 1 0 0 NIA 4.14 Design Report LS 1 32 32 Design Documentation- Includes all assumptions and design criteria for the proposed improvements Crandon Blvd - Task 2 - Phase 2 - designshetorms_v3.xlsx 4. Roadway Analysis Task No. Task Units No of Units Hours/ Unit Hours Comments 4.15 Roadway Quantities for EQ Report Length (Miles) 0 00 Catculated Hours 0 N/A Complexity Interchanges Rest Areas 0 4.16 TTCP Quantities for EQ Report Complexity Calculated Hours 0 N/A Major Phases 0 4.17 Cost Estimate LS 1 15 16 Use Cost per mile/ FDOT LRE based to prepare the estimate 4.18 Technical Special Provisions. and Modified Special Provisions LS 1 0 0 N/A 4.19 Other Roadway Analyses LS 1 0 0 N/A Roadway Analysis Technical Subtotal' 348 4.20 Field Reviews LS 1 4 1 field review@ 1 staff (Roadway Engineer)@ 4 hrs = 4 hrs (Sheet 3. Project General Tasks includes field review time for Project Manager) 4.21 Monitor Existing Structures LS 1 0 0 4.22 Technical Meetings LS 1 6 6 Meetings are listed below 4.23 Quality Assurance/Quality Control LS 3% . ' 17 4.24 Independent Peer Review LS % 0`:'r 0 4.25 Supervision LS % 1 0 Roadway Analysis Nontechnical Subtotal 27 4.26 Coordination LS % 0 !- 0 4. Roadway Analysis Total 375 Crandon Blvd - Task 2 - Phase 2 - desgnsheforms_v3.xtsx 4. Roadway Analysis Task No. Task Units No of Units Hours! Unit Hours Comments Technical Meetings Units No of Units Hours! Unit Total Hours Comments PM Attendance at Meeting Required? Number EA 1 2 2 yes 1 Pavement EA 0 0 0 0 Access Management EA 0 0 0 0 Line and Grade EA 1 2 2 yes 1 Driveways. EA 0 0 0 _ 0 Local Governments (cities, counties, MPO) EA 0 0 0 0 Work Zone Traffic Control EA 0 0 0 0 30!601901100°/ Comment Review Meetings EA 1 2 2 3'0% review meeting yes 1 Other Meetings EA 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Technical Meetings 6 Subtotal Project Manager Meetings 3 Progress Meetings (if required by FDOT) EA 0 0 T 0 PM attendance at Progress Meetings is manually entered on General Task 3 - Phase Review Meetings EA 0 0 0 PM attendance at Phase Review Meetings is manually entered on General Task 3 - - Total Meetings 1 1 1 6 I Total Project Manager Meetings (carries to Tab 3) f 3 CoRixs to 4.2.1 Carncs to Tab 3 Crandon Blvd - Task 2 - Phase 2 - designsheforms_v3.xisx 4. Roadway Analysis Estimator. Note: Task numbering is consistent with FDOT Design Scope of Services task numbering. Crandon Boulevard Recontruction TBD Task No. Task Scale Units No. of Units or Street Hours/ Unit or Sheet Total Hours Comments 5.1 Key Sheet Sheet 6 1 sheet 5.2 Typical Section Sheets 5.2.1 Typical Sections EA 6 12 2 typical sections anticipated, section of segment with parking and section of segment without parking 5.2,2 Typical Section Details EA 0 6 12 2 potential typical section details 5.3 General NoteslPay Item Notes Sheet 1 6. 16 1 sheet 5.4 Project Layout Sheet 1 4 4 2 sheet 5.5 Plan/Profile Sheet Sheet 4 6 112 Includes at sheet labeling not included in the Master Design Files (horizontal and vertical):1.4 miles14 sheets at 40 scale 5.6 Profile Sheet Sheet 1 0 0 N/A 5.7 Plan Sheet Sheet 0 0 0 N/A 5.8 Special Profile Sheet 0 0 0 N/A 5.9 Back -of -Sidewalk Profile Sheet Sheet 0 0 0 N/A 5.10 Interchange Layout Sheet Sheet 0 0 0 N/A 5.11 Ramp Terminal Details (Plan View) Sheet 0 0 0 N/A 5.12 Intersection Layout Details Sheet 7 9 63 Provide a detail sheet for each signalized intersection. These sheets can be used later for the signal work 5.13 Special Details EA 0 0 0 N/A Crandon Blvd - Task 2 - Phase 2 - designshefonns_v3.xlsx 5. Roadway Plans Task No. Task Scale Units No. of Units or Sheet Hours! Unit or Sheet Total Hours Comments 5.14 Cross -Section Pattern Sheets Sheet 1 4 1 sheet 5.15 Roadway Soil Survey Sheets Sheet 0 0 0 N/A (To be provided by the Village) 5.16 Cross Sections EA 147 0.5 74 Cross sections spaced at 50 -ft= 147 cross sections 5.17 Temporary Traffic Control Plan Sheets Sheet 0 0 1 sheet : Notes and typical sections to show TCP scheme and phasing 5.18 Temporary Traffic Control Cross Section Sheets EA 0 0 0 N/A 5.19 Temporary Traffic Control Detail Sheets Sheet 0 0 0 N/A 5.20 Utility Adjustment Sheets Sheet i1 0 0 N/A 5.21 Selective Clearing and Grubbing Sheets 5.21.1 Selective Clearing and Grubbing Sheet 0 0 0 N/A 5.21.2 Selective Clearing and Grubbing Details Sheet 0 0 0 N/A 5.22 Tree Disposition Sheets 5,22.1 Tree Disposition Plan Sheets Sheet 1 0 3 N/A 5.22.2 Tree Disposition Plan Tables and Schedules Sheet 1 0 0 N/A 5.23 Project Control Sheets Sheet 0 0 0 To be provided by the Village 5.24 Environmental Detail Sheets Sheet 0 0 0 N/A 5.25 Utility Verification Sheets (SUE Data) Sheet 0 0 0 N/A Roadway Plans Technical Subtotal 305 5.26 Quality Assurance/Quality Control LS 5 15 5.27 Supervision LS /m ' . 0 5. Roadway Plans Total 320 Crandon Blvd - Task 2 - Phase 2 - designsheforms_v3.xtsx 5. Roadway Plans Estimator. Note: Task numbering is consistent with FDOT Design Sea of Services task numbering. Crandon Boulevard Recontruction TBD Task No. Hours Task Units No of Units Hours! Unit Taal Corr Monts 6a.1 Drainage Map Hydrology Per Map 1 12 12 i 'V r1,re'inane mqp �.r r ng drainage basin dale needed to define the system hydrology and project area. 6a.2 Base Clearance Calculations Per Location 0 0 0 6a.3 Port Siting Analysis and Report Per Basin 0 0 0 6a.4 Design of Gross Drains EA 0 0 0 6a.5 Design of Ditches Per Ditch Mile 0 0 0 6a 6 Design of Stormwater Management Facility (Offsite or Infield Pond) EA 0 0 0 6a.7 Design of Sionrnvater Management Facility (Roadside Treatment Swales and Linear Ponds) Per cell 1 16 16 Review of existing draiange and conceptual desi n of drainage system to handle the needs of the .proposed P 9 g Ys p p typical section 0a.8 Design of Floodplain Compensation Per Floodplain Basin D 0 0 6a.9 Design of Storm Drains EA 0 0 0 6a.10 Optional Culvert Material EA 0 0 0 6a.11 French Drain Systems Per Cell 0 0 0 6a.11.1 Existing French Drain Systems Per Cell 0 0 0 6a.12 Drainage Wells EA 0 0 0 6a.13 Drainage Design Documentation Report LS 1 12 12 Prepare drainage notes/memo to be included in the project design documentation 6a.14 Bridge Hydraulic Report FA 0 0 0 6a.15 Temporary Drainage Analysis LS 1 0 0 Crandon Bird - Task 2 - Phase 2 - designsheforrns_v3.xlsx. ea, Drainage Analysis Task No. Task Units No of Units Hours/ Unit Hours Comments 6a.16 Drainage Quantities for EQ Report Drainage Structures 0 Calculated Hours 0 0 68.17 Cost Estimate LS 1 :. 0 6a.18 Technical Special Provisions! Modified Special Provisions LS 1 0 6a.19 Hydroplaning Analysis LS 1 0 6a.20 Existing Permit Analysis LS 1 0 6a.21 Other Drainage Analysis LS 1 0 6a.22 Noise Barrier Evaluation LS 1 C 0 6a.23 Erosion Control ,Plan Per Mile 0 0 0 Drainage Analysis Technical Subtotal 40 6a.24 Field Reviews LS 1 0 0 6a.25 Technical Meetings LS 1 0 0 Meetings are listed below 6a.26 Environmental Look -Around (ELA) Meeting LS 1 0 0 6a.27 Quality Assurance/Quality Control LS % 0% 0 6a.28 Independent Peer Review LS % 0X 0 6a.29 Supervision LS % 0% 0 Drainage Analysts Nontechnical Subtotal 0 6a.30 Coordination LS % 0% 0 6a. Drainage Analysis Total 40 Units No of Units Hours/ Unit' Total Hours Comments PM Attendance at Mooting Required? Number Base Clearance Water Elevation EA 0 0 0 Pond Siting EA 0 0 0 0 Agency EA 0 0 cl Local Governments (cities, counties) EA 0 ti 0 0 FDOT Drainage EA 0 0 0 0 Other Meetings EA 0 0 0 Subtotal Technical Meetings 0 0 Progress Meetings (If required by FDOT) EA 0 0 0 PM attendance at Progress Meetings is manually entered on General Task 3 - - Phase Review Meetings EA 0 0 0 PM attendance at Phase Review Meetings is manually entered on Genera! Task 3 Total Meetings 0 Total Project Manager Meetings (carries to Tab 3) 0 Carom to 6a 25 Carnea to Tab 3 Crandon Blvd - Task 2 - Phase 2 - designsheforms_v3xisx 6a. Drainage Analysis Estimator 6b. Drainage Plans Staff Hours Print Name Crandon Boulevard Recontruction TBD S1;patrrre /Data Repreeenitny FDOT District Consultant Name NOTE' Task No. Signature Block is optional, per District preference P oject Parameter Stet Hours Documentation Task Description Units Complexity Calculated Department Consultant Negotiated Provide documentation when negotoated hours dicier from tho calculated hours. 54.1 Drainage Map (Including Interchanges) Length (Miles) 1.40 Mid Range 34 0 0 0 TTt uooa au-w -Tegtmrns“es rau,,y au wwi asst. inauu vma/ IVY pivuuuuuii ui uaalflager map. Based on 10 hours per mile for low range (rural project, low number of structures, lots of available data). 24 84,2 Bridge Hydraulics Recommendeton Sheets Bridges 0 0 0 0 0 86.3 Drainage Structures Drainage Structures 0 0 0 0 0 Details 0 • - 0 0 0 0 64.4 Lateral Ditches Ditches 0 Standard 0 0 0 0 0 Camplez 0 0 0 0 Cross Section Alignments D 0 0 0 g 84.5 Retention+Detention/Floodpiain Compensation Ponds Ponds 0 Standard 0 0 0 0 0 Complex 0 0 0 0 Cross Section Alignments 0 0 0 0 0 84.8 Erosion Control Plan Length (Miles) 0,00 0 0 0 0 84.7 SWPPP WPM r Standard 6 0 0 0 includes creating and delivering the SWPPP Sheets to be included in the plan set Based an 8 hours for two out/ails or less and 10 hours for more than two outlet's. Drainage Plans Technical Subtotal 40 0 0 0 64.8 Quality Assurance/Quality Control % 5'7. 0 0 60,9 Supervision 5=/. 0 (1 6. Drainage Plans Total 0 Crandon Blvd - Task 2 - Phase 2 - dasigmehaforms_v3.xhx 60. Drainage Plans