HomeMy Public PortalAbout01 January 1979 Supplemental AgendaDATE
January 11
February 8
March 8
April 12
May 10
June 14
July 12
August 9
September 13
October 11
November 8
December 13
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
1979 MEETING CALENDAR*
DAY
- Thursday
- Thursday
- Thursday
- Thursday
- Thursday
- Thursday
- Thursday
- Thursday
Thursday
- Thursday
- Thursday
- Thursday
14th
14th
14th
14th
14th
14th
14th
14th
14th
14th
14th
14th
LOCATION
Floor
Floor
Floor
Floor
Floor
Floor
Floor
Floor
Floor
Floor
Floor
Floor
Conference
Conference
Conference
Conference
Conference
Conference
Conference
Conference
Conference
Conference
Conference
Conference
Room
Room
Room
Room
Room
Room
Room
Room
Room
Room
Room
Room
*May schedule meetings on the fourth Thursday of the month
if there are items requiring action by the Commission.
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM: Barry Beck, Executive Director
SUBJECT: City of Corona Transit TIP Amendment
The City of Corona has requested that its transit operating
project for FY 1979 be amended. The amendment would delete
UMTA Section 5 funds as a revenue source and instead all re-
quired operating subsidies would come from TDA funds. Corona
requests this change since its UMTA Section 5 grant funds are
not likely to be received for a number of months and in the
meantime local general funds are having to be internally
"borrowed" to meet the transit system's cash flow requirements.
There are two problems with Corona's request. First, by de-
leting UMTA Section 5 funds as a revenue source, UMTA will not
approve Corona's grant at the time they make a TIP correlation
check. Therefore, the TIP would have to be amended later to
again show UMTA Section 5 revenues. Corona should recognize that
this bureaucratic paper juggling may cause a delay in receiving
their UMTA grant. The second problem is: what happens when
Corona receives its Section 5 funds? They would have been paid
twice (with both state TDA funds and UMTA funds) for the same
project. This can be handled by considering the TDA funds as
a "loan" to be repaid when the UMTA funds are received. The
funds would be repaid to Corona's TDA Local Transportation Fund
(LTF) account held by the County Auditor.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Corona's request for a TIP amendment subject to receipt
of a letter from Corona that: 1) Acknowledges that the TIP will
have to be amended again in order to receive federal grant
approval and that this process may in fact delay grant approval;
and, 2) That Corona agrees to repay TDA funds to their LTF upon
receipt of their federal grant.
g/3
BB:nk
T 1
STATE. OF CALIFORNIA
Chairman
Norton Simon
Malibu
Vice Choirmon
judith•Soiey
Fresno
Members:
Robert Batinovieh
San Francisco
Claude Fernandez
San jose
Ivan Hinderaker
Riverside
Dean Meyer
iyfork
Frances Mossman
Santa Ana
Carole Onorato
Olympic Valley
Charles Reid
San Diego
Ex Officio Members:
Senator
james R. Mills
Assemblyman
Walter M. Ingalls
Executive Secretory
140MM SMRSer
M. Evanhoe
EDMUND G. BROWN jR.
Governor
Taltfi ritttt Ernttspmttttimt Tmmittissintt
1120 N STREET, P.O. BOX 1139
SACRAMENTO 95805
WHO 445-1890
December 8, 1978
Air. Barry Beck
Executive Director
Riverside County Transportation
Commission
3616 Main St., Suite 230
Riverside, C. 92501
Dear Mr.
The Southern California Association of Governments has
proposed that various project substitutions be made in
the Proposed 1979 State Transportation Improvement Program,
in conjunction with implementing AB 3020. Should these
proposed changes be accepted, it may result in the removal
of certain projects in your region from the adopted STIP.
Attached you will find a letter from SCAG, specifying
these proposed trade-offs, and a memorandum from Caltrans
setting forth the Department's recommendation.
The Program Committee of the California Transportation
Commission will be considering SCAG's proposed changes
at its December 14 meeting in Fresno, to be held at:
State Building - Auditorium
2550 Mariposa
Fresno, California
1:30 p.m.
Given the possible consequences for your region, you may
wish to attend this meeting.
Attachments
Sincerely,
MICHAEL P. EVANHOE
Executive Secretary
State' of California Business and Transportation Agency
• Memorandum
C'
To : Mr. Norton P. Simon, Chairman
California Transportation Commission
From : DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Director's Office
Subiect: AB 3020 Project Trade -Offs
Gate = December 7, 1978
File No.:
AB 3020 appropriates $66 million from resources in the State
Highway Account to augment the 1978-79 Highway Budget in
District 07. The Commission is required to allocate these funds
to projects and to make a progress report to the Legislature by
April 1, 1979.
In response to this Bill, the Department has recommended that
the Coriassion advance work on the Century Freeway (I-305). •
549.4 miiiion, anJ the NDute 91/11 Interchange, 516.E +aillion,
into the 19/8/79 bud7et year.
Thr southern California t.Lsint.ion of Governments, working with
the three cr,unty organirntic.,ns -within District 07, has nominated
a list cif projects not presently in the proposed STIP or 1977
Highway Pro-jram for this :66 million. Because the $66 million
is not additional money and since all forecasted revenues have
been programmed through 1983/84, budgeting any of these new jobs
in the 1978/79 fiscal year would mean projects now in the pro- -
posed STIP would have to be dropped. To maintain the. statutory
North/South split, the trade-offs would have to come from the
South.portion of the Program. It is also necessary to maintain
the statutory minimums and use a similar type of funding
(Interstate, Primary, State -only funds).
A summary of projects proposed by SCAG is:
No. of Fund Total
Pro'ects Type ($1,000)
1 Interstate (I) $ 26,000
2 Primary (F) 5,850
23 (Urban System) *State -Only. (ST) 34,150
TOTAL $ 66 Million
*Federal Urban funds are allocated by local officials;
therefore, these projects require State -Only funding if budgeted.
Mr. Norton
Page 2
December 7;
P. SimoJ
1978
The programmed South HE1 (New Facilities) projects that would be
dropped to permit the addition of the above projects are summa-
rized below and the specific projects are described on the
attached list. The lowest priority projects in the Department's
proposed ST,IP have been selected for the three categories of
funds required.
# of
Projects____
Fund
Type
3 Interstate (I)
6 Primary (F)
2 (Primary *State -Only (ST)
Eligible)
Total
($1,000)
$ 26,473
6,542
34,150
* Because Primary Eligible projects exceed the available Primary
Funds, the lowest priority projects not required to meet
statutory minimums will be State -only funded.
Although we have indicated the trade-offs required by budgeting
new projects (SCAG proposal), we strongly recommend that the
Commission bring the Century Freeway and the Route 91/11 Inter-
change projects into the 1978/79 budget as a response to AB 3020.,
We look forward to discussing this matter in detail at the meeting
of the Program Committee in Fresno on December 14, 1978.
PETER R. OSWALD
Deputy Director for
Planning and Programming
Attachment
cc: MEvanhoe, CTC
Statewide
Priority
No.
140
139
PROGRAMMED HE1 SOUTH PRO, :TS TRADE-OFFS tO PERMIT
ADDING $66 MILLION OF NEW PROJECTS
1979
Dist-Co-Rte STIP
PM/PM No.
11-SD-008
015.3
11-SD-067
000.OR
.11-Imp-008
077.9
82 0.8-Riv-015
018..6
192
151
151
112
110
09-Ker-058
106.1
07-Ven-101
018.8
08-Riv-194
016.5R
09-Iny-190
068.3
09-Mno-006
018.2
Limits
30H Eastbound Route 8 to Northbound
Route 67 Revise Interchange
2 4.4 miles E to 5.4 miles E Gordon's
Well Road - not in FAI Estimate -
Sand Hills Interchange
6 0.8 Mi. S of San Jacinto River to
0.5 Mi. S of Central Ave. Stage 1.
Initial 4-lanes and 5 bridges
Federal
Funding
I
I
Esc. Cost_
(Dollars)
FY (1,000).
83/84 $10,116 ,
83/84 .
+.mo.
79/80 14,365
HE1 Interstate Subtotal $26,473
10 1.5 Mi. W Cache Creek Br to 1.7 Mi F 81/82 $ 1,681
W of N Jct Rte 14 (portions) widen
to 4-lane conventional
248, At Beardsley Wash Br #52-164 RL
19F Haun Rd - between Garboni Rd and
Holland Rd
Construct 2-lane Frontage Rd
OB 0.6 Mi. W to 6.1 Mi. E of W 8ndry.
of Death Valley National Monument
Minor Realignment; Dip corrections
17 7.6 Mi. S Jct Rt 120 to 0.6 Mi, N
Jct Rte 120 at Benton (portions)
Reconstruct and add 4 shldrs.
F 79/80
F 79/80
8i/82
291
950
�` 81/82 1,572
"
"
2 5 B 0 8 - R i v - 0 7 9 1 8 0 . 6 M i . N t o 3 . M i . N o f G i l m a n F 7 9 / 8 C 1 , 9 1 8
e
0 3 4 . 5 S p r i n g s R d
C u r v e r e a l i g n m e n t a n d p a s s i n g l a n e s
A E 1 P r i m a r y S u b t o t a l $ 6 , 5 4 2
8 6 . 0 7 - O r a + 0 0 5 2 0 3 0 . 4 M i . - S / 0 . 4 M i . N o f S a n t i a g o 8 0 / 8 1 . 2 , 6 6 0
0 3 3 . 0 / 5 6 9 0 W / S a n t a A n a
C o n s t r u c t B r o a d w a y O v e r c r o s s i n g
3 9 0 7 - - V e n - 1 0 1 2 4 5 C o n e j o / 0 . 2 M . E o f V i n e y a r d 8 0 / 8 1 3 1 , 4 9 0 r -
9 . 0 / 2 1 . 8 . W i d e n t o 6 l a n e s `
�� '