Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
09-09-2014
MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL (2052 County Road 24) 1. Ca11 to Order 2. Public Comments on items not on the agenda 3. Update from City Council proceedings 4. Planning Department Report 5. Approval of August 13, 2014 Draft Planning Commission minutes 6. Dominium — 510 Clydesdale Tr. — Mixed Use Stage I Plan for development of 26 affordable rental townhomes. 7. Charles Cudd De Novo — Preliminary Plat and Rezoning for 15 lot single family residential development to be located east of Co. Rd. 116 and south of Hackamore Rd. 8. Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Potential amendment to the Staging/Growth Plan regarding the pace of development in the City. 9. Farhad Hakim — 22 Hamel Road — Site Plan Review to construct an Apartment Building and an Accessory Parking Garage. 10. Council Meeting Schedule 11. Adjourn POSTED IN CITY HALL September 5. 2014 Date: `' j' j /(7\u) L G , T Y Comment MEDINA Name of Speaker: L M1 5 Card '1'1 \ eV Public Forum Agenda Item 6, 4 Address: `� S b `'' c l lease print) I '°A0 J1 Telephone (optional): Representing: `3 e 1; Agenda Item (list number and letter): Comments: Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: G, T Y o F Comment Card MEDINA Name of Speaker: t\b \` �.,,Qutiy? 4' Public Forum m Agenda Item 4 1 aseyrint) n Address: LI cl9 () i' ec \ L.0"S jU Telephone (optional): 1 V�-- 8 L,v j Representing:crr4" Agenda Item (list number and letter): ..-r,, )Z rll f'tl,: ,_:v Comments: f k \\ Gr` ,i i Y "= ``,`-'mss Qt Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: G , T Y o Comment Card MEDINA Public Forum Agenda Item /" Name of Speaker: 2 (? ��U C ---.. V --5e Address: I/0; ( leas print) I vv./ Lc< Telephone (optional): Representing: -e (c Agenda Item umber Comments: ' ` c and letter): (0 V 4 L (4, $ .rte % c-i}e A) 7- S frl---_,--e____ ft c.- s /4"565 6147Coi4^1.4 _ ___)",-4 Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: (7 9- 2 0/ q c., x T Y 0k Comment Card Public Forum Agenda Item MEDINA Name of Speaker: 'F(, Ail k M'; aJ r) of -e - (please print) AddreSS: 3-34, R co Fos .-Di; v -e- Telephone (optional): Representing: "1—k e F� r.4 2 e 0 G 01,0, M e L Agenda Item (list number and letter): DO (1 ' N I LI Comments: W 11 Al— ir:R eca M a m e Ica. 7 A 4/e C; -r; 274 6-' 0 4 M t .0 Ix 4 ) 67 ./ vrio 'T6 ` LAI. G,z O''v NQa' Approach the podium to eak a ifl 55f3 ";r,,) Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: c, T Y o Comment Card Public Forum Agenda Item MEDINA M. Name of Speaker: 16 trn be j r 1 1 i,�Y\ m- vi V) (please pr i t) 1 Address: -4"\() C '1/1-C Vlr C.1 �t1-1 1 —r t'/, i) i Telephone (optional): Representing: Agenda Item (list number and letter): DOM 1(/"j I IA Vt-) , }k VV (/ Comments: Ct V C; (YIA Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: G , T Y o Comment Card Public Forum Agenda Item MEDINA Name of Speaker: 5TH7/_ /'ve"es�-,e.e. L / (please print) Address: .()0 Sh>>9ui,ve-,c G%oas '� Telephone (optional): Representing: 5 '' Agenda Item (list number and letter): 7 - Zihwzts e� 4 b6- /tin/c) Comments: Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: lyq t T Y t Comment Card MEDINA Name of Speaker: FE umo b+ VIvAoLa Public Forum Agenda Item iii 8 (please print) Address: LI S" 4 l3k,vt, UL1 ya.A4c. S Telephone (optional): —163 2 03 1;6 9 Representing: Se tc Agenda Item (list number and letter): A 4j Comments: Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: c, ` 7 Y Comment Card MEDINA Name of Speaker: NA 0,1(1,--- Zb-t-- Public Forum Agenda Item (please print) Address: (, (-[% 51, L ,)v i,„,, t ex.x)C' Telephone (optional): Representing: Agenda Item (list number and letter): g Comments: Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: G , T Y Comment Card MEDINA Name of Speaker: _' ." i G j,, -`h --G-ve,f,- cW 4 Public Forum Agenda Item (please print) Address: (0 00 �� C4 L,,iry P tkj 00-A3 fel Telephone (optional): Representing: Si-,_ \_( Agenda Item (list number and letter): C, Comments: Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: G% T Y O F Comment Card MEDINA 5 Public Forum Agenda Item Name of Speaker: lease ) Address: fri. VU 5° -7 7 Telephone (optional): v 1 d�----��" l !,3 7? Representing: Agenda Item (list number and letter):-==3PG/A'25 gi Comments: Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: .1 11 it iv T Y o Comment Card MEDINA Name of Speaker: ' ---TATI't 12-9S Public Forum Agenda Item 1 (please print) Address: Lti� RA S G—� EACH _rK \�;•1 1 Telephone (optional): Representing: - S1 2 '�i' NAV � ' 1 7th tt'AVI M Agenda Item (list number and Comments: l Art-f/t letter): ) t ?VI) G (y1 U\'' Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Weir and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: August 29, 2014 SUBJ: Planning Department Updates September 2, 2014 City Council Meeting Land Use Application Review A) St. Peter and Paul Cemetery CUP — St. Peter and Paul church intends to expand their cemetery at the southeast corner of County Road 19 and Hamel Road. Improvements include new access drives, landscaping, stormwater.improvements and additional grave sites. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at the July 9, 2013 meeting and recommended approval. The City Council reviewed on August 19 and directed staff to prepare a resolution of approval, which will be presented on September 2. B) Go2Print Media Site Plan Review — Go2Print Media has requested Site Plan Review approval to construct an accessory storage building at 62 Hamel Road. The Planning Commission reviewed at the August 13 meeting and recommended approval. The request is scheduled for review at the September 2 City Council meeting. C) Capital Knoll Subdivision — south of Hamel Road, north of Blackfoot Trail, east of Arrowhead Drive — Princeton Capital — the applicant has requested a subdivision of the existing 30 acres into three rural lots — the property fronts on both Hamel Road and Blackfoot Trail. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at the August 13 meeting and recommended approval. The request is scheduled for review at the September 2 City Council meeting. D) Wakefield Subdivision — 3385 County Road 24 — The Wakefield Family Partnership has requested approval of a rural subdivision of 74 acres at the southeast corner of Homestead Trail and County Road 24. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at the August 13 meeting and recommended approval. The request is scheduled for review at the September 2 City Council meeting. E) Hamel Place apartment Site Plan Review — 22 Hamel Road — Farhad Hakim has requested approval of a site plan review to construct a 8 -unit apartment building at 22 Hamel Road. The applicant has also requested that the City consider vacating a portion of an existing utility easement to allow the structure in this location. The Planning Commission reviewed at the August 13 meeting and requested a number of changes to the plan. The applicant has provided an extension and is considering ways to address Planning Commission comments. The application is scheduled to be reviewed again at that September 9 Planning Commission meeting. F) Dominium Affordable Rental Townhomes — 510 Clydesdale — Dominium has applied for a Stage I Plan to develop 26 affordable rental townhomes on 3.85 acres. The townhomes would include rent and income limitations because the developer has received pledges for funding through Minnesota Housing. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and the matter will be scheduled for a Public Hearing when complete, potentially at the September 9 Planning Commission meeting. G) Villas at Medina Country Club PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat — East of CR1 16, south of Shawnee Woods Road — Rachel Contracting has requested approval of a subdivision to include 28 "villa" style single family homes and 20 larger single family lots. The matter was scheduled for a public hearing at the August 13 Planning Commission meeting, but the applicant requested the hearing be postponed to address staff concerns. Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 September 2, 2014 City Council Meeting H) Woodland Hill Preserve subdivision — east of CR 116, north of Medina Lake Drive — Charles Cudd De Novo has requested preliminary/final plat and rezoning approval for the development of 15 lots on the 16 acres (7.99 net acres) immediately north of the Toll Brothers Reserve of Medina project. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and the matter will be scheduled for a Public Hearing when complete, potentially at the September 9 Planning Commission meeting. I) Property Resources Development Co. (PRDC) Comp Plan Amendment/PUD Concept Plan — West of Willow Drive, southwest of Deerhill Road — PRDC has requested a Comp Plan Amendment to reguide 90 acres from Rural Residential to Low Density Residential (2-3.49 units/acre) and also a PUD Concept Plan for a 99 lot subdivision. The PUD Concept Plan is incomplete at this time and will be scheduled for review when complete information is submitted. The Comp Plan Amendment Public Hearing was delayed indefinitely at the request of the applicant. J) Verizon Telecommunication Tower CUP — 3574 Pinto Drive — Verizon has requested a CUP to replace an existing telecommunication tower located on top of the City water tower with a stand- alone 159 foot tall monopole tower in the same location. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the June 10 meeting and recommended approval. The City Council adopted a resolution of approval on August 19. The application will now be closed. K) Woods of Medina Preliminary Plat — Jeff Pederson has requested preliminary plat and rezoning to subdivide 9.5 acres (8.8 net acres) at the intersection of CR116 and Shawnee Woods Road into 16 R1 single family lots. The request includes a vacation of a portion of Shawnee Woods Trail and a partial waiver from tree preservation requirements. The City Council adopted documents approving the requests at the January 7 meeting. Staff will await a final plat application. L) Enclave at Brockton 41h Addn — Lennar has requested approval of the next phase of the Enclave at Brockton, to include 18 single family homes. The City Council approved at the April 15 meeting, and staff will work with the applicant on the conditions of approval. M) Hamel Haven Final Plat — 805 Hamel Road — JJC Hamel LLC has requested final plat approval for a proposed lot split. The Council granted preliminary approval back in 2011. The Council adopted a resolution granting final plat approval on May 6. Staff will work with the application to complete the conditions of approval. N) Three Rivers Park/Reimer Lot Rearrangement — the property owners have requested a lot rearrangement to allow a "land swap" of property which the Reimers own on the west side of Homestead Trail and which Three Rivers owns on the east side of Homestead Trail. The City Council reviewed at the August 7, 2013 meeting and adopted a resolution of approval at the August 20, 2013 meeting. Staff will work with the owners to finalize the conditions of approval. 0) Morrison Lot Split and Variance — Truxtun and Adrienne Morrison have requested to subdivide their 18 acres at 1525 Hunter Drive into two lots. The City Council approved of the division at the June 4 meeting. Staff will work with the applicant to finalize the terms and conditions of the approval. P) D.R. Horton Stage 1 Plan — D.R. Horton has requested Stage I Plan approval for development of Mixed Use property west of Arrowhead, east of Mohawk and north of Highway 55. The entire property is approximately 84 acres in area (approximately 59 acres upland) and the applicant proposes 85 single family lots, a 54 unit apartment building and 5 acres of commercial development. The City Council granted Stage I approval at the January 21 meeting. Other Projects A) Comp Plan Revision Discussion — staff held Open Houses on August 21 and August 26 to received feedback on the Staging and Growth Plan and the pace of development. The meetings were relatively well attended. B) Cable Build -out — staff is reviewing information provided by Mediacom related to the plans to install cable in the community. Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 September 2, 2014 City Council Meeting 1 CITY OF MEDINA 2 PLANNING COMMISSION • 3 DRAFT Meeting Minutes 4 Wednesday, August 13, 2014 5 6 1. Call to Order: Commissioner Nolan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 7 8 Present: Planning Commissioners Charles Nolan, Robin Reid, Randy Foote, Kent Williams, 9 Robert Mitchell, Victoria Reid, and Janet White. 10 11 Absent: None 12 13 Also Present: Council Member Kathleen Martin, City Planner Dusty Finke, and Planning 14 Consultant Nate Sparks. 15 16 2. Public Comments on items not on the agenda 17 No public comments. 18 19 3. Update from City Council proceedings 20 Martin updated the Commission on recent activities and decisions by the City Council. 21 22 4. Planning Department Report 23 Finke provided an update of upcoming Planning projects for July. 24 25 5. Approval of the June 10, 2014 Draft Planning Commission meeting minutes. 26 R. Reid asked for a correction to page six, line 262, of the June 10th minutes. She had 27 expressed agreement and support for V. Reid's comments and wanted it on the record. 28 29 Motion by , seconded by , to approve the June 10, 2014, Planning Commission minutes with 30 correction. Motion carries unanimously. 31 32 6. Rachel Contracting PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat to develop 48 single 33 family residential lots along the north and west portions of Medina Golf and Country 34 Club. 35 36 7. Public Hearing - Wakefield Family Trust — 3385 Co. Rd. 24 — Preliminary Plat to 37 subdivide one parcel into 3 Rural Residential lots. 38 Sparks presented the staff report. He noted that the minimum lot size in the RR 39 district is 5 acres of contiguous suitable soils. He stated that the applicant is 40 contesting the Hennepin County soils map, and provided surveyed topography and 41 soil boring information. 42 43 Mitchell inquired about the septic sites on Lot 1. Sparks showed the location of the 44 existing septic system. 45 46 Mitchell inquired if the driveway for Lot 3 could be moved as far west as Hennepin 47 County is requesting. Sparks noted that the lot is wide enough to accommodate that 48 request. 1 49 V. Reid inquired if the shared driveway was a City requirement or the applicant's 50 wish. Sparks responded that the applicant showed it in this way because of County 51 comments. 52 53 Public Hearing opened at 7:25 p.m. 54 55 Finke noted that a property owner to the east who shares the driveway in Outlot A 56 called the City and stated they were not concerned with the subdivision, but agreed 57 that the driveway for Lot 3 should be pushed as far west as possible. 58 59 R. Reid stated that she had an interest in protecting the views on Homestead Trail. 60 The large wetland will accommodate this protection so that she has no concerns. 61 62 Mitchell inquired where the building locations would be. Spark showed on the plan 63 where they would be located. 64 65 Public Hearing closed at 7:27 p.m. 66 67 Motion by V. Reid, seconded by Williams, to recommend approval of the 68 Preliminary Plat request to subdivide one parcel into three rural residential lots with 69 conditions noted in staff report. Motion carries unanimously. 70 71 8. Public Hearing - Princeton Capital —1575 Hamel Road — Preliminary Plat to subdivide 72 one lot into three Rural Residential lots. 73 74 Sparks presented the staff report. He noted that two lots were proposed to share an 75 access off Hamel Road and the third lot accessed off of Blackfoot Trail. 76 77 Mitchell asked staff to confirm that the math was correct for the additional right -of - 78 way. Sparks said it will be clarified going forward. Y P 79 80 Foote inquired if Blackfoot Trail would need to be updated since it is substandard. 81 Sparks noted that the existing property could already have one home off of Blackfoot, 82 so staff is not recommending improvements since no more lots are proposed on this 83 side of the property. 84 85 Public Hearing opened at 7:37 p.m. 86 87 John Riley of 1405 Blackfoot Trail stated that all the neighbors that live on the road at 88 this time enjoy the gravel road, as they feel it keeps traffic down. They believe the 89 road should be left as it is. 90 91 Finke said the City has an adopted policy for roadway updates — 50/50 split with tax 92 levy dollars if initiated by City. He also went into some of the history concerning 93 Blackfoot Trail. Finke also mentioned that there is nothing in the 5 -year CIP for 94 upgrades to Blackfoot Trail. 95 2 96 Paul Ohnsorg of 1475 Blackfoot Trail asked about the trail along Blackfoot, and 97 where it would go. 98 99 Finke mentioned there would be a north connection to the County trail in the future, 100 but for now there is not an immediate plan. 101 102 Ohnsorg also asked where the driveway on Lot 3 would be located. 103 104 Sparks stated that their plans were not known and they don't have a set location on 105 the plan at this time. They would have to meet the City's driveway location criteria. 106 107 Finke stated that one matter staff had discussed was that these are rural lots and there 108 may be an expectation for animals and animal structures on the property. He said 109 there is a 150' setback animal structure requirement and this plan only has a very 110 narrow strip that would be eligible for animal structures. There was a consensus that 111 the applicant should be put on notice concerning the existence of this requirement. 112 Finke said staff will work on adding recommendations and language concerning the 113 animal structure requirements. 114 115 Motion by R. Reid, seconded by White, to recommend to the City Council approval 116 of the Preliminary Plat request to subdivide one parcel into three rural residential lots 117 with conditions recommended by staff and adding an additional condition related to 118 setbacks for animal structures. Motion carries unanimously. 119 120 Mitchell asked to add a friendly amendment to the motion for number 9 clarifying the right - 121 of -way numbers. Motion to accept the amendment by R. Reid, seconded by Williams. 122 Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: none) 123 124 9. Go2 Print — 62 Hamel Road — Site Plan Review to construct a 1500 square foot free - 125 standing Accessory Building. 126 Finke showed the proposed site plan — accessory use to office use. Property is zoned Uptown 127 Hamel II. Location of storage building is partially a result of the easement, which is why 128 they are requesting a stand-alone building as opposed to adding on to the principal structure. 129 He stated where the building would be set and the flexibility that is there — zero lot line 130 setbacks on sides and rear to accommodate utilities. Set 2' from western line and 2' from 131 northern line as shown in plans. Eugene Street, western lot line, is privately maintained and 132 is being used mainly for parking for the area. City installed stormwater improvements. He 133 went on to state what building materials were allowed to keep to the historical nature of the 134 area. 135 Ordinance requires generous window coverage and, as proposed, the building would not meet 136 the 30% facade standard on the street level, which he felt the Commission should discuss. 137 Eugene Drive may at some time in the future be developed into a public street and is used at 138 this time as a road to get into some of the sites. Parking sites would be taken up by the new 139 building proposal, but there could be flexibility since there are opportunities for on -street 140 parking and public parking in the future off Mill Drive. He also discussed the trees that 141 would need to be removed (six large) and that according to standard ordinance 30" of 142 replacement trees would be required and the applicant is asking for a waiver to that code item 143 as the trees are not particularly high quality. Planning Commission will be asked to make a 3 144 determination on the requirement and if in favor of the tree waiver, would have to adjust the 145 recommendation to the Council. 146 147 V. Reid asked about Eugene Drive and what it may become in the future. Finke said he 148 doesn't see that changing, but could possibly terminate at a parking lot to the west. There was 149 also a clarification to the fire department using the west side of Eugene Drive for parking of 150 vehicles. V. Reid also asked if there was a possibility of each building having two different 151 uses in the future. Finke said it would have to meet code and they could not have two 152 principal uses on the lot, the storage building is accessory. Nolan and V. Reid raised concern 153 about the storage building not having very many windows or enough parking. V. Reid said 154 the goal in that area is to have an urban environment. Finke stated that the City has flexibility 155 towards parking in that area. Nolan summarized the discussion by stating that the 156 Commission is reviewing what the applicant is requesting today, but if for some reason in the 157 future a more intensive use were to be requested, then it would have to be relooked at for 158 approval and would have to comply with City code requirements such as parking. 159 160 Nolan asked for elevations of the building. Finke provided exterior elevations and the 161 Commission discussed. Mitchell asked if the storage building met the window requirements. 162 Finke said it didn't if it's determined to be the street level/fronting a street. Nolan said the 163 area is to be considered a pedestrian friendly area, yet the structure is accessory. Williams 164 said he visited the site and he thinks it would be a vast improvement to construct a building 165 there as opposed to the way it looks now. 166 167 Williams asked about paving and also for clarification of where they are proposing it. Finke 168 said the paved area would be right in front of the storage building. Williams said he was 169 concerned with paving, since it would increase the impervious surface. Finke clarified by 170 stating that it wouldn't be increasing since everything would be within existing gravel. 171 172 Foote raised concern with vehicles being parked within the private easement at the rear of the 173 lot that is to be utilized for emergency access only. Finke explained that if the whole site 174 were being developed new, it would be laid out differently. 175 176 Tom Therrien, applicant and owner of Go2 Print, stated he could answer any questions from 177 the Commission. Nolan asked how long he's been in the space and Therrien said he 178 purchased it in 2010. Therrien said he's a sales print company. He said some of the finished 179 goods he does store, even though they send out for printing. He said he rents the property 180 next door for storing. He said he'd like to own his own storage area rather than rent. He 181 stated that he prefers to have his own storage on site and said how much easier it will be for 182 their business. William asked how many parking stalls behind his building get taken up at a 183 time each day. Therrien said there are four in the back and two parking spaces on the side. A 184 total of six people are in the office at any given time and there isn't the need for parking for 185 retail customers, since most of his clients are on the east coast. He said the building doesn't 186 show windows in the door, but he could put window panels in it. 187 188 Nolan asked if the design was more of a barn -like structure with the high windows. Therrien 189 said yes. Therrien said he would do whatever the Commission wants for the landscaping and 190 discussed some of the ideas he had for landscaping. He said he would like to stay clear from 191 planting trees since within 10 years they typically need to be removed. V. Reid asked about 192 the cottonwood tree being removed and what would remain. Therrien said there would be an 193 ample amount of trees remaining. The windows were also discussed and he said that he 194 could lower them if that is what the Commission wants, but would be concerned with how it 4 195 would look if he were to have scaffolding or shelving in front of the windows. The 196 Commission consensus was that it was OK to have the high windows, but that maybe a 197 different style door would add to the appeal of the building without adding a lot of expense 198 since it is facing the street. The Commission generally liked the idea of a barn style or 199 carriage style door that had the appearance of being wood, but was still metal and insulated. 200 There was also a consensus noted by the majority of the Commissioners concerning the tree 201 waiver. 202 203 Nolan said the addition to the storage building does trigger additional parking. 204 205 Motion by Mitchell, seconded by R. Reid, to recommend to the City Council approval of 206 the construction of a 1500 square foot Accessory building, with the following conditions #1-3 207 remain as recommended by staff, strike #4, #5 commission recommends a tree waiver, # 6 is 208 acceptable, #7 additional parking not required at this time for the storage building, but if a 209 change in use occurs in the future, the parking would have to be addressed at that time, #8 & 210 #9 remains as written, and #10 to be added to require a new garage door style with wood 211 cladding or equivalent. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: none) 212 213 10. Farhad Hakim — 22 Hamel Road — Site Plan Review to construct an Apartment 214 Building and Accessory Parking Garages. 215 Sparks presented the application and reviewed the overall project. He said density and 216 hardcover for the lot met requirements. He also explained that an easement vacation was also 217 necessary as part of the project and that they were asking for an eight foot easement rather 218 than ten feet. The side yard setback would then be eight feet. The drive aisle is proposed to 219 be two feet from the side property line in portions of the side yard, not all. The minimum 220 setback to the side yard is 2.5 feet and so a waiver would be necessary for the reduced .5 of a 221 foot. 222 223 Sparks explained the parking for the building was not underground, but rather enclosed 224 parking via a detached parking garage. Sparks said the ordinance requires the garage have 225 exterior materials that match the principal structure. He said they are proposing the accent 226 material of the principal structure as the primary exterior material for the parking garage. 227 Sparks wanted to make sure the Commission was satisfied with the proposed exterior 228 material and recommended it be a condition of approval. 229 230 Sparks explained the site has a lot of trees. He said the applicant is proposing to remove all 231 of the trees except for one ten inch elm tree. After calculating the significant trees to be 232 removed and adjusting the formula from what's explained in the staff report after consulting 233 with City Planner Finke, the applicant would be allowed to remove two trees at no penalty 234 and so the final tree removal would be 98 trees. Sparks said the applicant doesn't have a tree 235 replacement plan and staff recommended a tree replacement plan be provided either for on - 236 site or off -site. He said the applicant was not requesting a tree waiver. 237 238 Sparks explained the drive aisle width meets the 24 foot in width requirement. He said in 239 order to maintain the drive aisle width it impacts the setback of the parking garage and two 240 foot bump outs were necessary for sufficient maneuvering out of the garage on the end 241 spaces. Staff feels the applicant has made sure the drive aisle width is wide enough for safe 242 maneuvering. 243 244 Sparks said the apartment units have laundry rooms in each unit and have three bedrooms. 245 The applicant is proposing more parking than what is required by code. 5 246 247 Sparks said the applicant has shown landscaping in some areas, but additional areas are 248 shown bare and a revised landscape plan should be submitted to address that all bare areas on 249 the lot be landscaped. 250 251 V. Reid asked if the City had any special design standards for Uptown Hamel. Sparks said 252 there are special architectural standards in the code. He said an example of that would be that 253 the ordinance requires porches off the front of the building and the applicant is proposing to 254 bring the building and porches up closer to the front sidewalk to meet the code requirement. 255 He said specificity of a Vintage style look isn't expressly written in the Code. Finke asked V. 256 Reid if her question was more related to scale rather than design. V. Reid said the proportion 257 and the look of the building don't have an old town feel like the other condo building in 258 Hamel. She would like to see some modifications to the exterior appearance. 259 260 Finke said even though the applicant did not request a tree waiver, he is sure one will be 261 requested before this goes up for approval to the Council so he requested the Commission 262 address the issue. White asked if staff knew the quality of the trees on site. Sparks said the 263 site does have four black walnuts and two maples on -site. Williams asked if there are any 264 other residences abutting the rail line and if it's even appropriate to have residences along 265 there. Finke said the City has planned for residential in this area and if it makes a difference 266 to them the railroad crossing nearest this project doesn't have the train whistle at the crossing. 267 268 The closeness of the railroad was discussed and if it makes sense to put a structure that close 269 to the railroad. The fact that it is a rental property was pointed out and that people will 270 realize before they make a commitment that there is a railroad close by. Foote said the trains 271 go through that location around 50 mph and many trains go through the area daily. R. Reid 272 said she considers a residential apartment building different than someone purchasing a home 273 near a railroad track. She said presumably people would see that the apartment building was 274 located near railroad tracks. V. Reid ask for clarification of Mixed Use zoning and that she 275 thought the property had to have two uses on the site and it also said it's shown for high 276 density residential. Sparks said the Comprehensive Plan guides it Mixed Use and it is zoned 277 Uptown Hamel, so not zoned Mixed Use. Williams asked if this application met the required 278 density and Sparks said yes. R. Reid said that this is the type of residential they were looking 279 for in this area. She did want to express her concern with how the building looks and to add a 280 condition relating to design of the building. 281 282 Nolan asked if the applicant was present and Finke said the applicant wasn't at the meeting. 283 284 R. Reid asked if there is any way to require a different type of design, and if so, how specific 285 would they have to be to do that. Finke said the applicant was open to changing up the 286 design as long as it's not cost prohibited. Nolan said he is concerned that they didn't have 287 reasonable tools to work with. He said he is used to reading plans all the time and the ones 288 submitted were drawings and not very useful and he felt the City should require some sort of 289 rendering with color. He also commented that the look of the elevations is very different than 290 what is in the packet. 291 292 The Commission suggested specific design guidelines be established in the future for Uptown 293 Hamel since the City is starting to see some activity in the area. 294 295 Mitchell doesn't like the fact that there are so many incomplete items, concern with the 296 architectural exterior appearance and that the applicant isn't present at the meeting. He 6 297 suggested the item be tabled and asked if there was enough time to do so. Sparks said the 298 review deadline is September 30th and there were not enough Council meetings to get it 299 through the process. 300 301 R. Reid raised concern that the exterior building as proposed looked like it was out of the 302 50's -60's era and isn't anything close to what they are looking for in Uptown Hamel. She 303 said it has the potential to be a really ugly building. V. Reid said she thinks it's great to have 304 residential in that area. R. Reid agreed. 305 306 Nolan raised concern with the concrete patio that has a sliding glass door which is below the 307 balconies. He said it has potential for a sitting area with a grill that could eventually be a 308 rusting weber kettle and broken plastic chairs and would be close to the sidewalk. He 309 suggested some sort of screening to contaift the patios similar to that of the upper balconies. 310 311 Nolan said he wanted to see more articulate modulation/detailing to the building. 312 313 Finke said the Commission could recommend additional conditions to work forward prior to 314 going to the Commission. Nolan said he'd like to see more landscaping in front of the 315 building and into the parking lot to break up some of the pavement. R. Reid suggested more 316 creative landscaping. Nolan said he's asking for some more specific items. 317 318 Tom Therrien of Go2 Print said the rendering doesn't do a lot for it, but he asked the 319 Commission to give modern materials a chance, because sometimes the blending of old and 320 new can be good. 321 322 Nolan said the overall issue for him is not being able to really understand what they are 323 looking at on the plans. He also feels he doesn't have enough tools to review the application. 324 If he were to make a recommendation it would be to deny the application based on not having 325 enough information. Williams said the conditions are so open ended that he's not sure how 326 they are ever going to know if the conditions have been met. Nolan asked for guidance from 327 staff. 328 329 Nolan said he would recommend denial based on the landscaping being insufficient and that 330 the renderings are not clear as to what they are proposing. Mitchell said they only make a 331 recommendation and the Council acts on it. Finke suggested a conditional tabling, subject to 332 receiving an extension letter. The recommendation would be to table it and go back to the 333 Commission for another review so that when it does go back to the Council it is substantially 334 complete. 335 336 Finke clarified the additional concerns of the Commission which were landscaping and 337 architectural modulation. Nolan said conditions 3-5 were still incomplete, and suggested 338 adding another condition that the architectural appearance of the building needs to be more 339 consistent with the Uptown area. 340 341 Motion by Mitchell, seconded by Williams, to recommend tabling of the application to 342 resolve all pending issues based on the applicant providing an extension by August 21, 2014. 343 Additionally the applicant shall be present at the next meeting. If an extension is not 344 provided by the applicant, then the application is denied. Motion carried unanimously. 345 (Absent: none) 346 347 7 348 11. Council Meeting Schedule 349 Mitchell agreed to attend and present at the August 19, 2014 Council meeting. 350 351 12. Adjourn 352 Motion by Williams, seconded by R. Reid, to adjourn at 9:26 p.m. Motion carried 353 unanimously. 8 AGENDA ITEM: 6 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231 .2555 Facsimile: 763.231 .2561 planners@nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Medina Planning Commission FROM: Nate Sparks DATE: September 4, 2014 RE: Dominium Stage I Plan Review CITY FILE: LR-14-141 Application Date: July 16, 2014 Review Deadline: November 13, 2014 (extended) BACKGROUND / PROJECT DESCRIPTION Dominium has made an application for a Mixed Use Stage I Plan Review for a proposed townhome development located at 510 Clydesdale Drive. The project is proposed for construction of 26 rental townhomes on a private internal drive with associated accessory improvements (club house, playground, parking) on approximately 4 acres of land north of the Medina Entertainment Center. The Stage I Plan Review is intended to review the land uses, general site layout, densities, and other initial components and to provide direction to the applicant in order to ensure the project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance prior to any preliminary plat and Stage II Review. Previously, the applicant had sought approval for a Planned Unit Development at the same site. This application was for a 32 unit townhome project with a similar layout. The applicant withdrew that request and instead is seeking consideration for this proposal. SUBJECT SITE The subject site is vacant and vegetation is predominantly grass. The site is utilized on rare occasions as overflow parking by the Medina Entertainment Center. Most of the site is flat, although it falls steeply closer to the north and east property lines. A portion of a larger wetland extends onto the northeast corner of the site. Surrounding uses include commercial to the south and west, private recreation (golf course) to the north, and single family homes (planned for commercial redevelopment) to the southwest. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONING The Comprehensive Plan has this site guided for a Mixed Use -Business designation. The Comprehensive Plan states that: "Mixed -Use Business (MU -B) provides opportunities for multiple, compatible uses on one site including two or more of the following: residential, general business, commercial, or office. Residential densities in this designation will be between 7.0 units per acre and 45.0 units per acre across the entire area and may include some vertically integrated uses. The mixed -use business areas will be served by urban services." The property is zoned Mixed Use (MU). The Zoning Ordinance states that the intent of the Mixed Use District is to integrate a mix of uses to promote housing and commercial diversity and that the district may be used to transition from intense highway oriented uses to lower density residential uses. The Planning Commission and City Council have previously decided that allowing multiple uses (residential, commercial) within a MU -B site is permissive in the Comp Plan, not a requirement. This has been implemented previously in the Uptown Hamel zoning districts which permits a site to develop with solely residential uses, and through rezoning other MU -B properties to solely residential districts. Staff has anticipated that some property within MU -B will develop with only commercial uses and some property will develop with higher density so that all MU -B property, taken together, falls within the range. The City has zoned the subject property as Mixed Use, which allows a net density from 3.5-7 units per acre, and therefore accounted for a lower amount of residential development on this site. The zoning of this property was discussed specifically when the City rezoned property to be consistent with the updated Comprehensive Plan. It was determined at that time that zoning this property Mixed Use would be consistent with the MU -B guiding, when put in the context of the zoning requirements of the remaining MU -B property in the City. MIXED USE STAGE I REVIEW Each Mixed Use development is required to be reviewed in three stages. The Stage I Plan is intended to establish the general layout of land uses and densities. The overall plan layout is to be reviewed for overall compliance with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. A successful Stage I Plan is then recorded against the property and establishes the general parameters for the overall site. It does not guarantee any development rights, as many issues may evolve or be discovered in the more thorough nature of reviews in the later stages. After Stage I, the Stage II Plan is reviewed in conjunction with the Preliminary Plat and other commonly associated zoning approvals. This would include fully engineered plans. The Stage III Plan follows thereafter with the final plat. To review any mixed use plan, the City must consider generally if the plan meets the following objectives: 1) This District shall consist of creative and thoughtful residential and commercial development that preserves open space and natural features. 2) Residential density shall average between 3.5 units per acre and 6.99 units per acre over a minimum of half of the developable area. 3) Residential development shall complement existing development in surrounding residential neighborhoods. 4) Developments shall incorporate creative design and buffering techniques to ensure smooth transitions between different types of development or different intensities of uses. 5) Where appropriate, developments shall be easily accessible to pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users. 6) Development shall include high quality and attractive building materials and architectural design as well as extensive landscaping in order to limit impacts on surrounding land uses, and shall be integrated and coordinated in a way to most efficiently utilize site improvements and to protect the natural environment. 7) Development in the MU District shall demonstrate consistency with the goals, policies, and other elements of the Comprehensive Plan. 8) Development shall be designed to be served with public utilities, streets and other infrastructure without separate City investments, including the necessary extension of such infrastructure to connect with surrounding existing and/or future development. In addition, development in the Mixed Use zoning district requires the following general standards: (1) Minimum Residential Density: 3.5 dwelling units per net acre. (2) Minimum Land Area to be devoted to residential uses shall be 50 percent of net developable land. (3) Maximum Density: 6.99 dwelling units per acre (see density incentives). (4) Required residential density shall be calculated using the total number of units and the total land area devoted to residential uses in the Stage I Plan. (5) Where feasible, residential areas shall consist of more than one dwelling unit style, e.g. single family detached dwellings, two-family dwellings, attached townhouses, or multiple family dwellings. (6) Areas abutting and within 300 linear feet of Trunk Highway 55, County Road 19 or Willow Drive shall be utilized for commercial land uses. (7) Areas within 100 feet of property designated in the Comprehensive Plan for rural residential or low density residential development, shall be comprised of only single family detached or two family attached dwellings. (8) If the two standards in (6) and (7) above conflict, standard (6) shall have precedence. Proposed Uses/Project Density The applicant proposes to develop the entire subject site with townhomes, along with accessory uses to townhome development. As noted above, a minimum of 50% of the net developable land is required to be residential. No minimum commercial component is established, except for areas abutting and within 300 linear feet of certain roadways. The subject property is not abutting or within 300 feet of these roadways. The Mixed Use zoning ordinance requires that "where feasible" residential areas shall consist of more than one dwelling unit style. Staff notes that this is by far the smallest Mixed Use zoned property in the City. This would make implementing a "horizontal" mix of uses fairly difficult. The Planning Commission and City Council can discuss if a greater mix of uses is feasible on the site. The Mixed Use Zoning District allows for a density of 3.5 units per acre up to 6.99. Also stated is a minimum area per unit of 8,750 square feet and a maximum of 12,500. For this second standard there are options for density bonuses as outlined in Section 842.2.05 Subd. 4. The overall site is 167,726 square feet. The wetland area is 4,015 square feet in area and the wetland buffer is 7,645 square feet. Therefore, the net area of the lot is 156,066 square feet or 3.58 net acres. The applicant qualifies for three density bonuses for affordable housing, sound suppression, and common open space. The applicant has received pledges for financial support through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency and other agencies to develop townhome units with limits on the rent which can be charged and limits on the income level of the occupants. This qualifies the project for the density bonus related to affordable housing which allows for 1.5 unit per acre. The applicant is also proposing a sound suppression system that is exceeding the minimum STC rating in the building code by 10. This qualifies for a density bonus of 0.5 units per acre. The project has common open space which qualifies for a density bonus of 0.25 units per acre. With the proposed density bonuses, the site is allowed to have 25 units. The project, as proposed, has 26 units. Prior to consideration of the Stage II Plan, one unit would need to be removed. Proposed Site Layout The applicant proposes 26 townhome units in eight buildings. A horseshoe private drive provides access to the units and is proposed to have two access points to Clydesdale Trail. The townhomes all include attached two -car garages and sufficient depth for parking two cars in each driveway. The applicant also proposes a clubhouse for common use and a playground for recreational use. Thirteen guest parking spaces are proposed in addition to the garage and driveway parking. The following table depicts the setbacks proposed by the applicant: MU Standard Proposed Setback from Clydesdale Trail (buildings and parking) 50 feet 50 feet Setback from private street 25 feet 25 feet Setback between buildings 30 feet 30 feet Side and Rear Yard 20 feet 20 — 40 feet Max. Hardcover 50% 44.50% . The grades behind most of the units fall fairly steeply and there is limited usable space beyond the patios/decks. However, a common recreational area is provided in the south center of the site. As noted above, the purpose of a Stage I Plan review is to establish uses, densities, and general site layout. More specific development issues are reviewed as part of the Stage II review. However, the applicant has provided more in-depth plans. As such, staff has provided general review comments on a number of subjects which will be more fully reviewed at the time of Stage II review. Wetlands A wetland on the property to the east extends into the northeast corner of the site. The wetland is classified as Manage 1 according to the City's Functional Assessment of Wetlands. An upland buffer with an average width of 30 feet is required, and structures are required to be set back an additional 15 feet from this buffer. Streets/Parking The applicant proposes a 24 foot wide private drive to provide access to the individual driveways for the townhome units. No parking will be allowed along the access drive in order to allow adequate emergency vehicle circulation. The City Engineer has not identified the need for improvements to Clydesdale Trail to support the proposed development. The applicant is proposing to provide 13 guest parking stalls which is '/2 stall for every unit. These spaces are important because no street parking is available. Staff recommends that the owner regulate these spaces to be for guest use only. The driveways are generally proposed with 40 foot widths, as for many units there is a shared drive for neighboring units. This is wider than the standards allowed for drives that access public streets but is acceptable due to the fact that it is a private drive. If possible, the applicant may wish to consider a grass strip separating the drives. Stormwater/LID Review The applicant proposes to meet the City's water quality requirements through a series of rain gardens along the south of the property. Stormwater will be treated before being discharged to the pond on the adjacent site, which was designed to accommodate this site for rate control purposes. The City Engineer has provided some direction for some technical changes, which are attached. Buffer Yards and Landscaping For the Mixed Use District standards, landscaping is required for one conifer or deciduous tree per 60 feet of lot perimeter, one ornamental tree per 120 feet, and one understory bush per every 40 feet. The Ordinance also requires buffer yards of a 0.2 opacity to the north property line. The applicant has designed a landscaping plan to meet these minimum requirements. There is no significant tree removal proposed for the site. Lighting The applicant proposes 12 street lights along the private shared drive and at the playground. Building mounted lights are proposed on the clubhouse. The applicant proposes LED fixtures which are fully downcast as required by code. Existing streets lights are already located along the back of the trail on the north side of Clydesdale Trail. Light measurement readings are limited by code to 0.6 FC at the property line. The applicant's photometric plans show that the existing fixtures along Clydesdale Trail which light the trail will exceed this amount, but the applicant's proposed new fixtures generally meet the standard. Sewer/Water All sewer and water improvements within the site are proposed to be privately maintained. The City Engineer has provided comments, which are attached. Pedestrian Circulation/Recreation The applicant proposes playground equipment in the southern portion of the site. The applicant has also proposed a sidewalk through the common space which connects with the trail on Clydesdale Trail. Building Type & Design Unit Types The Mixed Use District requires, when feasible, more than one dwelling unit style for each new development. The proposed development contemplates two styles as there are townhomes and two -unit buildings proposed. There are five four unit townhome buildings proposed and three two unit buildings. Two of the two unit buildings are of a similar aesthetic style to that of the townhome buildings. Of the four -unit buildings, three have end units with four bedrooms and interior units with three bedrooms. The other two four -unit buildings have three bedroom units only. One two -unit building has three bedroom units while the other two have only two bedrooms. One two -unit building has two accessible units. As mentioned earlier, one unit will need to be removed to meet the maximum density standards. This may result in a Phase II Plan with a different building type. Materials City ordinances require a minimum of 20% of townhome facades facing public or private streets be an accent material. Because this is a PUD, the City could require some additional elements. Existing plans show this standard being met with brick and shakes along the front elevation of the 4 -unit buildings along with the windows. Modulation/Articulation City regulations require the building design of townhomes buildings to be modulated a minimum of once per 50 feet. The rear elevations shown on the plans are broken up through the use of materials and dormers with a bump -out by the patio or deck. The second floor of the front facade bumps in and out based on the number of bedrooms in each unit. The applicant has proposed garage doors with windows, as well. Generally, the buildings appear to meet the intent of the Mixed Use Ordinance. Commissioners should provide comment on the building design. Building Height City regulations limit building height of townhomes to 32 feet if not sprinkled. The height of the proposed structures varies from 23-28 feet in height. Garages City regulations require townhomes to have garage space of two cars per units (minimum of 440 sq. ft.) The plan meets this standard. Additionally, additional architectural elements ("may include varying setback of garage doors, differentiating roof designs, constructing dormers, and installing garage doors with windows or other design elements") are required if garage doors occupy more than 50% of the frontage of a building. The applicant has proposed garage doors with windows in order to improve the facade to meet this standard. The front elevation also includes differences in roof design over some of the garages. Trash and Recycling Code requires that trash and recycling bins for individual dwelling units are stored so not to be prominently visible form streets or neighboring units. The applicant has increased the sizes of the garage to exceed the minimum standards in order to allow for room to store trash containers inside the building. Plat The subject site is currently platted as an outlot. With the Stage II Plan this will need to be platted into a buildable lot. RECOMMENDATION City Officials are to provide comment on the proposed Stage I Plan which is intended to provide land uses, general site layout, phasing, and other general elements. If the Planning Commission finds that the plan is generally consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and the intent of the Mixed Use District, it would be appropriate to recommend approve the request with the following conditions and comments (at minimum): 1. The plan shall be consistent with the requirements of the Mixed Use zoning district. Subject to density bonuses described in the Mixed Use zoning district, the maximum number of units shall be 25. 2. All comments from the City Engineer should be addressed. 3. All comments from the Watershed District should be addressed. 4. Stage I Plan approval does not confer any development rights. Development shall be subject to Stage II Plan approval in addition to other relevant approval processes, including subdivision. Such development shall also be subject to all relevant ordinance requirements in place at the time of this subsequent approval. 5. The Owner shall record against the Property an agreement, in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney, which describes the general layout, land uses, and densities required by the future development of the Property in order to ensure compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and other relevant regulations. 6. Any future development shall obtain Stage II and Stage III approval prior to any construction and these plans shall be consistent with the general layout, land uses, and densities depicted on the approved Stage I plan. If the Planning Commission finds that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Mixed Use District, it would be appropriate to recommend denial of the application to the City Council. Exhibits: 1. City Engineer's Report(s) 2. Applicant's Narrative 3. Applicant's Plan Set 4. Letters of Support submitted by Applicant WSB &.,,,„� engineering• planning• environmental- construction August 4, 2014 Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: City Project: Dominium Stage 1 Plan, LR-14-141 WSB Project No. 2712-09 Dear Dusty: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the Stage 1 Plan submittal dated July 14, 2014, for the Medina Townhomes site. The plans propose to construct street and utility improvements to serve a 26 unit townhome development at 510 Clydesdale Trail. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters. Sheet C2.0 Site Plan 1. The proposed retaining wall along the east Side of Road C and north of Clydesdale Trail should be located outside of the perimeter drainage and utility easement. Sheet C3.0 Grading Plan 1. The grading plan should be revised so that public works can access the existing sanitary manhole in the northeast corner of the site can be accessed from Clydesdale Trail. An access at least 10 -feet wide with grades less than 10% should be provided over the existing sanitary sewer easement between Clydesdale Trail and the above -mentioned sanitary manhole. 2. The plans should include emergency vehicle turnarounds to the satisfaction of the fire marshal, specifically within the site at the west end of Road B. 3. A landing area with grades between 1% and 2% at least 50 -feet long should be provided on Road A at the intersection with Clydesdale Trail. 4. The existing catch basin shown in the proposed curb cut at the intersection of Road C and Clydesdale Trail should be relocated outside of the curb cut or the location of the intersection should be revised so the catch basin is not in the curb cut. 5. Earth work calculations should be provided for review. St. Cloud • Minneapolis • St. Paul Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:101711-0901AdminlDocsiDomininm Sage I Review-080414.doe Dominium Stage 1 Plan August 4, 2014 Page 2 Sheet C4.0 Utility Plan 1. The sanitary sewer design connection in Clydesdale Trail should be eliminated. The plans should be revised to reverse the flow on Road C and direct those flows to the north to SAN MH-2. SAN MH-2 should be moved north and a pipe should be constructed from SAN MH-2 easterly to the existing sanitary sewer along the east boundary of this parcel. A new manhole should be constructed over the existing sanitary sewer and the pipe between SAN MH-2 and the new manhole should be at a grade not to exceed 4%. This will most likely require designing SAN MH-2 to be a drop structure. 2. Future submittals should include a stormwater management plan. 3. The plans should include proposed low floor elevations and sanitary sewer service invert elevations. 4. The proposed trench drain along the west side of Road C north of Clydesdale Trail should be shown and labeled. 5. The watermain line type along Road C should be revised to match the other watermain line types. Please contact me at 612-209-5113 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. /OW Tom Kellogg K:',.0'712-090i4dminiDocsInominium .Singe 1 Review-0804/4.doc Larkin Hoffman. ma ATTORNEYS July 16, 2014 Dusty Finke City Planner City of Medina 2052 County road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431-1194 GENERA.: 952-835-3800 FAX 952-896-3333 WEB: www.larkinhoffman.com Re: Dominium Stage I for 26 Rental Townhomes on 3.9 Acres of Land Located at 510 Clydesdale Drive (the "Project"); Our File #35,539-01 Dear Mr. Finke: We represent Dominium (the "Applicant") in its application for approval of a Stage I Plan under the City's development regulations for the Mixed -Use (MU) District. See Section 842.2 of the Medina City Code (MU District Regulations). The purpose of this letter is to set forth the compliance of the revised development plans for the Project with applicable City zoning regulations. To prepare this zoning analysis, we reviewed the prior record of consideration of the PUD General Plan for a similar project of 32 affordable rental twnhomes, as well as the revised plans submitted with this application. In summary, the enclosed plans have reduced the number of proposed dwelling units from 32 to 26. In addition, the revised plans comply fully with development standards for setback and lot layout as set forth in the City's Land Development Code for the MU District. Since the resulting density on the property is less than seven (7) units per acre, and the building setbacks have been revised, the applicant is no longer seeking flexibility under the City's Planned Unit Development (PUD) regulations. Discussion Land Use and Zoning Compliance As noted in the staff report, dated June 3, 2014, the subject property is guided for Mixed Use - Business (MU -B). Higher density residential development is permitted under the MU -B guiding for the subject property. In previous applications, the Planning Commission and City Council have determined that residential is a permitted use under the Comprehensive Plan whether or not the use is developed with a mix of uses. This is particularly true where the subject property is surrounded by a mix of uses, including commercial, entertainment, industrial and recreational uses. Under the MU District, residential development is listed as a permitted use, allowed as a matter of right. These permitted residential uses include "Townhouse Dwellings, provided no structure Dusty Finke July 16, 2014 Page 2 contains more than six dwelling units". See Section 842.01 of the Medina City Code. With the revised plans, the density of development does not exceed seven (7) units per acre and complies with both the Comprehensive Plan and MU District Regulations. See Section 842.2.05 of the Medina City Code. Proposed Site Layout Dominium proposes 26 townhomes in eight (8) buildings. The townhomes include attached two - car garages and sufficient driveway depth to satisfy parking requirements. The Applicant also proposes a clubhouse for common use and a playground for recreational use. COMPLIANCE WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS Zoning Code Requirement City Code Standard Proposed Standard Setback from Public Street (buildings and parking) 40 feet 40 feet (building) 25 feet (parking) Setback from private street 25 feet 25 feet Setback between buildings 30 feet 30 feet Side and Rear Yard 20 feet 20 feet (west) 40 feet ( north) Side and Rear yard — if adjacent property is less intensive zoning 40 feet N/A Maximum hardcover 50% 46% Wetland building setback 15 feet 15 feet Buffer Yard and Landscaping 30 overstory trees 15 ornamental trees 44 shrubs 35 overstory trees 15 ornamental trees 112 shrubs Maximum Building Height 32 feet 23-28 feet Garages Minimum two cars/unit Minimum two cars/unit Dusty Finke July 16, 2014 Page 3 Conclusion The Applicant has reduced the density of the Project and has modified the Site Plan to fully comply with City Code. In addition, certain amenities have been enhanced, including the stormwater facilities; driveways have been lengthened for safety and certain recreational facilities have been enhanced. These improvements will be more fully described by our client in the public hearing scheduled for review of this application. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me with questions regarding this submittal. Please incorporate this letter in the official record of decision in this matter. Thank you. Sincerely, William C. Griffith, for Larkin Hoffman Daly kfndgren Ltd. Direct Dial: 952-896-3290 Direct Fax: 952-842-1729 Email: wgriffith@larkinhoffman.com cc: Jeffrey R. Huggett, Dominium Nick Andersen, Dominium Ron Batty, City Attorney 4811-0320-0028, v. 2 bank. COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE 800 Nicollet Mall, 5th Floor BC-MN-H5AD Minneapolis, MN 55402 June 3, 2014 Mr. Paul Sween Dominium Development and Acquisition 2905 Northwest Blvd. - Suite 150 Minneapolis, MN 55441 Dear Paul: All of us serving you I am writing this letter as a reference to the good work that Dominium has done over the years for U.S. Bank (USB). USB has an extensive relationship with Dominium on both the debt and equity side of the business. Our relationship encompasses dozens of transactions in multiple states across the United States. The Dominium Principals are straight forward and have always demonstrated the highest integrity in all of their dealings with USB. In fact, our comfort level with your firm is so high that we've hired you to be our work out agent on several projects that were experiencing problems. In one particular example, the previous developer had taken on a complicated project that was beyond their capabilities and made promises to the city they could not keep. Dominium stepped into the situation, corrected multiple construction deficiencies, leased up the project and developed a very productive working relationship with the City. USB does business with affordable housing developers all over the US and we count Dominium among our very best clients. If there is any additional information I can provide, please let me know. Sincerely, t i Kyle Hansen Executive Vice President usbank.com June 2, 2014 Mayor Elizabeth Weir City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Re: The City of Saint Anthony's Experience with Dominium Mayor Weir: I understand that Dominium is proposing the development of a 32 unit townhome in the City of Medina and that this development will offer family housing to the residents of Medina of varying income levels. I am writing you today to inform you of the City of Saint Anthony's experience with both the Dominium Development as well as (and possibly more importantly) the ongoing Management team. The Landing at Silver Lake: In the fall of 2004 Dominium completed the construction of the Landings at Silver Lake Village, a 263 unit development. The Landings at Silver Lake Village was financed with the combination of tax- exempt bonds and low income housing tax credits. The development provides a wonderful housing option within the City of Saint Anthony at a variety of rent levels in conjunction with income levels. The quality of construction development at The Landings at Silver Lake is excellent. The Management team operates the property in the most professional manner. The Landings is a development that we at the City of Saint Anthony are proud of. The Legends at Silver Lake: In January of 2014 Dominium began construction on another development in the City of St. Anthony — The Legends of Silver Lake. The Legends when completed will be a 170 unit apartment development, which also was financed with the use of tax-exempt bonds and low income housing tax credits. This development is a senior development and is 100% affordable. The City of Saint Anthony had a 10 year history with a very successful mixed income development when we approved The Legends. Our positive experience with Dominium made it fairly easy for City Staff and Council to support a second development. I am confident that The City of Medina will have a positive experience with this team. Sincerely, f ' Mayor Jerry Faust City of Saint Anthony Phone: (612) 782-3301 E-mail: ifaust(a,ci.saint-anthony.mn.us 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699 • www.ci.saint-anthony.mn.us • (612) 782-3301 • (612) 782-3302 Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village, which is sustainable, safe and secure. CITY OF SAINT PAUL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CHRISTOPHER B. COLEMAN Mayor August 6, 2014 Mayor Elizabeth Weir City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Re: Dominium Development Dear Mayor Weir, Creating thriving, vibrant communities for current and future residents requires that cities and developers come together to provide a mix of affordable and market -rate housing options. Partnerships between reputable developers and cities build great communities and strengthen us all as a region. Dominium Development has completed new construction, rehabilitation, and adaptive reuse housing projects in Saint Paul including 808 Berry Place, Carleton Place Lofts, Maryland Park Apartments, and the Schmidt Artist Lofts. The company is also working on final plans for a new construction senior housing development on Saint Paul's East Side. All of these projects have helped to address the city's community needs and accomplish redevelopment goals. Last week, the grand opening event was held for the Schmidt Artist Lofts. This project included a massive renovation of the brewhouse and bottlehouse buildings on the historic Schmidt Brewery site. Dominium preserved and transformed the buildings into live -work affordable housing for artists along with community spaces to showcase their talents. The complex now has 247 apartments and 13 new construction rental townhomes. This development was primarily financed with a combination of tax-exempt bonds, federal and state historic tax credits, and low income housing tax credits. Aside from the investment and renewal for the neighborhood, what's most impressive is that these units are 100% occupied and have brought new residents to our city. As you consider Dominium for a 26 unit family townhome development in Medina, feel free to contact me with any questions about their work. We have found their work and management of their proper�es to bi -quality. Si Mayor Chris Coleman City of Saint Paul CITY HALL SUITE 390 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102-1615 651/266-8510 AA-ADA-EEO Employer N5ithfidd Housing and Redevelopment Authority August 5, 2014 Mayor Elizabeth Weir City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Re: The City of Northfield's Experience with Dominium Dear Mayor Weir: I understand that Dominium is proposing the development of a 26 unit townhome project in the City of Medina and that this development will offer family housing to the residents of Medina of varying income levels. I am writing you today to inform you of the City of Northfield's experience with both the Dominium Development and ongoing Management team. The City of Northfield and the Northfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority worked closely with Dominium Development in 2009 and 2010 on an affordable housing project near the core of our community. Jefferson Square Townhomes is a 50 unit townhome development, offering two, three and four bedroom units to low and moderate income households. Originally built in the early 1980's, the complex was close to sunset of the existing tax credits and if not renewed, the units would be market rate and sold to the highest bidder. Dominium Development stepped in and not only purchased the property, but also applied for and received tax credits to preserve the affordable rents of these units for another 20 years. They also completely gutted and remodeled every unit, built a community building for the residents of the complex to use, and re -landscaped the entire five acre parcel. Thanks to the work of Dominium Development, a blighted property was rejuvenated and is able to provide affordable housing for Northfield's workforce for another 20 years. Their continued on -site management of the property has resulted in a clean, safe property that provides housing for the families working in Northfield's treasured downtown and our renowned industries. Additionally, Dominium was a pleasure to work with on this project. I am confident that The City of Medina will have a positive experience with this team. Sincerely, Michele'Me ycuke Michele Merxbauer, MSW Community Development Coordinator City Hall ♦ 801 Washington Street ♦ Northfield, Minnesota 55057 507.645.3047 ♦ fax 507.645.3055 ♦ e-mail: Michele.Merxbauer@ci.northfield.mn.us CITY a,i "a;: OF IINO4L KES August 4, 2014 Mayor Elizabeth Weir City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Re: The City of Lino Lakes Experience with Dominium Mayor Weir: 1 understand that Dominium is proposing the development of a 26 unit townhome project in the City of Medina and that this development will offer family housing to the residents of Medina of varying income levels. I am writing you today to inform you of the City of Lino Lake's experience with Dominium. The City of Lino Lakes has worked with Dominium on Lakewood Apartments. Lakewood was a new construction, affordable housing project built in 2007. The project was built by another developer, and after being built, the property faced a number of challenges, including frequent police calls. Dominium became involved at the end of 2008, and since their involvement, we've seen vast improvements. . Lakewood Apartments was primarily financed with low-income housing tax credit equity and HOME funds from Anoka County. The development provides a wonderful housing option within the City of Lino Lakes at affordable rent levels. Overall, Dominium has done a great job with this project. I am confident that The City of Medina will have a positive experience with Dominium. Sincerely, 514 Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes CC: Nick Andersen, Dominium 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651-982-2400 • Fax: 651-982-2499 httpc//www. ci.euclicl. oh. us June 3, 2014 To All Interested Parties: 585 East 222nd Street, Euclid, OH 44123.2099 Bill Cervenik, Mayor Phone: 216/289-2700 Fax: 216/289-2766 Please allow this communication to serve as a strong letter of support for Dominium Management Services. The Company's management of the Euclid Apartments in the City of Euclid, Ohio has been nothing short of phenomenal. Prior to Dominium's involvement, this property was underutilized, in poor physical condition and was a source of frequent criminal and nuisance activity. I had grave concerns about the future of the complex and the detrimental effect it would have on the city if it continued to decline. Today, as a result of Dominium's management, residents are now afforded a quality and well maintained household in which to live and raise their families. The environment at Euclid Apartments has become one that has created pride in the hearts of its residents as they live in a safe, secure and inviting property where various activities and services are provided that enhance the quality of life. Dominium is also very active in the City of Euclid, sponsoring and participating in various business and community events. I can say that you would be wise to welcome the addition of Dominium Management Services to invest in and manage properties in your Community. They have proven to the City of Euclid that they are capable and responsive property managers with the resources and resolve to do the job right. Please feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Yours truly, L,,.„,z Mayor Bill Cervenik e a ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN a s. i COINER 91RAC.G (4-n I IO 10 I I 10 BUIL ING 2 Gross: 8 628 sq. ft. Foo tprint: ,845 sq. ft. .447[1 • Aa Cd4041E OARING 10 AAA[ 11011 91001) MX •P0AR UTCAL CROW AM R LARYr aS f7 B1 B1 M B1 B1 r C BUILD IN G 1 C ross: 8,191 sq. ft. Footprint: 4,844 sq. ft. er T R ExNeiSido JO 41 WTH *AIFRPROOF SEAA4T, C REBAR DOLL Pat W1CRE1E R AY ED¢ [2) R4 ROW - Cd)1NI0J5 CAOR 10p6R.IKB7 /7�\ colinciED BADE W 1E0A J �----- re -4 PLRFOIAIID GRAN 111 RN FRIER COL RAQ- a RA CRAW L A DEN AND ARO UND DURING MSTAUATION > GL01EK9 E FLIER FA9 a0 IY MPH (Wt)j6AWKD 5UD 8" x 18" CONCRETE PLAY EDGER SCALE: 1' . 1'-p A010 CONCRETE PLAY EDGER mu: I., -r 30' MINNUY ® ® T r BUILDING 3 Gross: 7,628 sq. ft. Fo otprint 4,345 sq. ft. B B B 1111111111111 BUILDING 9 Gro ss: 8,191 sq. ft. Foo tprint: 4,844 sq. ft. PRO PERTY LINE 0[ VISuAL HEAPING AVANED 6)441 B 30' MINIMUM BUILDING 8 G ro ss. 3,461 sq. ft. Footprint: 2,240 sq. ft. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlI1I11T1[111111 BUILDING 4 Gross: 8,191 sq. ft. Foo tprint: 4,844 sq. ft. BUILDING 7 G ross: 1, 253 sq. ft. Footprint: 1_253 sq. _ EA SEMENT CLYDESDALE TRAIL BUILDING 5 G ross: 3.836 sq. ft. Footrrint: 2,325 sq. ft. •� WETLAND • •�, � EA SEMENT ...... - - - - - - J7-] 26'-11 1/Y I ® 1 • • • • • 41 ••• ACCESSIBLE UNIT D D BUILDING 6 — Gr oss:3,315 sq. ft . Foo print: 3,315 sq. ft EASE MENT ACCESSIBLE UNIT --- _1 41 3 4 I II'II : I I 1 I I I I I I I I L..J A B C. SEE CNA AND LANDSCAPE DRAWI NGS FOR ADOMONAL SITE K00 6861 4. SEE MECHAMCN. AND ELECTRICAL DRA WI NGS FOR ADp1401uL UTILITIES INFORMATION. EXISTING 5 NN4GE. PARKING L GHTNG, PUBL IC ACCOMAOOAT464S. UIUTL5. ETC. GALL BE KEIN OPERATIO NAL OR REPLACED WITH NEW THROUGIWT THE DURATION OF T HE PR OJECT. ASSOCIATED WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH T HE OWNER AND UTILITY 008CNL5. 0. CO NTRACTORS SHALL REPA4R ALL UNAUTHORIZED PROPERTY DAMAGE THEY CAUSE AT N0 COST TO T HE OWNER . E. PROTECT A0 KEEP CLEAR ALL ROADS, CUNBS. AND GUTTERS OARING CON5TR0CI10N UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. PROVIDE DIVERSIONARY DRAINAGE AS REQUIRED WHERE WOW INTERRUPTS THE DOSING STREET DRAI NAGE PATTERNS . A NY DAMAGE 10 E 051NG ROA DS AND GUTTERS SHALL RE REPARE0 AT THE C ONTRACTOR'S 00PEN5E . F. LOCATE UTU11E5 PRIOR TO EXCAVATION AND M ANTAN MARANGS Of EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAI N MANG CONSTRUCTION . PR OTECT AID CONSTRUCT A ROUND E051NG UTILITIES TO REMAIN A5 NECESSARY . COOR DINATE ACCESS TO LOCAL MIMES WITH OWNER MECHA NICAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, A640 ENGINEERS AS RED4 A ED. CONTRACTORS ARE ADVISE0 OF THE PRESENCE OF UNDER GROUND *1471 [5 N T HE AREAS OF FOUNDATION EXCAVATION . G. CONCRETE EIXKPMENT PADS SMALL BE SIZED ACCOR DING 10 ED UIPMENI R 006406ENT5 UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHER WISE. LINT ALL SITE DISTURBANCE TO THE ARE AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS, SEE CIVIL. SEE OWL FOR 400ITKRAL 64ORI ATIO6 DIMENSIO NING OF DRIVES, WALKS , AND PA RKING AREAS. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LO CATIONS OF SITE LIG HTING SEE STRU CTURAL AND LANDSC APE DRAWINGS FOR RETAINING WALLS AND FOUNDATION. SEE L ANDSCAPE PLANS FOR EXISTING 800019TIN (TREES. 408.485, GRASS. ETC) TO TO REM AIN 0/4 THE SITE. PROTECT AS 60050(ED H. J. K. L. FLOOR PLAN -KEYNOTES O1 CORCRETE DRIVEWAY- SEE COL OASPHALT DU NE- SEE CML ASPHALT AT UNIT DNVE WAT- SEE CARL OCONCRETE 0468 ®CONCRETE SURMOUNTABLE CURB ®CONCRETE WALK ORETAINNG WALL- SEE DAL DRAWINGS ®CE AC5 SIBLE PLAYGROUND BY OT HER PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE ACCESS TO PLAY GROAN. VERWY SLOPE OF W A8 5 NEVER 14AN SS R NOM FRAMED DECK Al BACK OF MOUSING LINO. SEE DETAIL 2/A633 10 CONCRETE PATIO AT M O( 0 4IO U540 UNIT . MONUMENT SIGN . SEE DETAIL 3/A633 11 DEMO EXISTING CAR CUT . PROVIDE NEW CURB AND NE W TRAIL TO MATCH EXISTING SEE CML 0000640 WETLANDS TO BE PROTECTED DURING Vy I3 AND AFTER CO NSIRU CTON- REFER TO CAL AND LANDS CAPE PUNS 14 RAIN G ARDEN- SEE CML ACCESSIBLE CONCRETE WALK TO ACCESSIBE 15 UMIS PRO VIDE 3'-0' MITT WA IL WITH ACCE551B40 TURNING. 16 WA0BOKE5 LATCHED PATTERN DESIG NATES FACES 17 RECEIVING BRICK VENEER SEE ELEVATIONS BKV GRO UP Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boa rman KFOOB Yerl Group Inc 222 N orth Second Street Minneapolis MN 55401 Telephone 61 2-339-3752 Fa csimile 612-339-6212 www .bkvgroup.com REVISED SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET 08-29-2014 PROIE GrTITLE Medina Townhomes K EY PL AN CEFOFIUTION Cair0CATION I IrR4/' a .1yB Werile pn .pAdlal a mat w ppred p RN r alir WR' Rene apMNPN M tK I aN a (k4 Win ed RIh•ImM Ardis addles km DIVA Soo orNew Yak 14709 Wino liner REVISIO NS Na DATE REVISE D APPIC NAL 01-21-14 DATE DRAWN BY CF EO® BY COMM ON NO. 0R -2P-14 N 139373 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PL AN A0I0 0 2014 BKV Gaup. Ina EDE PROTECT TREE O REMAIN I L.__ • / ./ REMOVE EXIST. TRA IL AND CURB AND GUTTER REMOVE &SALVAGE EXIST. LIGHT POLE 8 FIXTURE TRANSPLANT EXIST. TREE WITH TREE SPA DE Yr— PROTECT TREE 0 PE MAM TRANSPLANT EXIST. TREE WITH TREE SPADE PROTECT TREE IN FINAL LOCATION GOPHER STATE ONE CALL W W W. GOPHERSTA TEONECALL ORG (.0) 252-1100 TO LL FREE (051) 0560 002 LOC AL 116 r o _j 10I REMOVE & SALVAGE EXIST. LIGHT POLE 8 FIXTURE - REMOVE EXIST . TRAIL AND CURB AND GUTTER SURVEY INFORMATION' . EXISTING CONDRIONS LEGEND' 54tHEV BY N ESTA000 PROFESSIONAL SER.12ES LEGAL DESCRIPTION'. OLIGLOTS DCCNAGG uDA EMARNETPi ACE HENN EPN rvNESOTn 1 EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTIN G MANHOLE p EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTI NG HYD RANT • EXISTING STOPBOX CO EXISTING GATE VALVE ■ EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX • EXISTING LIGHT p EXISTI NG GAS METER • EXISTI NG GAS VALVE SOIL BORING LOCATION CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING SIGN EXISTING S ANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTI NG WATE R MAIN EXISTI NG GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDE RGROUND ELE CTRI C EXISTI NG UNDE RG ROUND CABLE EX.2CONT OUR ELEVATION INTE RVAL 104 OvESfiThe <CB CCD 6 .11 St. LOUIS PAH , AIN Y94, 26,212.22 214 BKV GR OUP 41P DOMIN[UM MEDINA T OWNHOMES CLYDESDALE TRAIL, MEDINA, MN DOMINIUM 2905 NORTHWEST BLVD, PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 LICENSED PROFESSI ONAL EN GINEER ORDER THE LAAS ZTTA E ST ATE OE Mallnex R Pa vel, RAY 721.1 LICE NSE ISSUE/SUB MITTAL SU MMARY art2.24 WETLAND AND S GE L AY OUT REV 22,4 2,1 REVISED SITE PLAN A PPR OVAL REVISI ON S UMMA RY DESCRIRGON EXISTING CONDITIONS AND RE MOVALS C1.0 PLO TTED: 7/15/2014 3:1642 PM 1101116. 11 / 5 FENCE; BLACK VINYL -COATED CHAIN 1 E%TEND FENCE TO PROPERTY LINE AT WEST END EX yEGETAnON EDGE LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN SOD 0 2(r 11111111111 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: ' Nimbi!! OVERSTORY/EVERGREEN TREES REOURED ORN AMENTAL TREES REOUIRED LOW EVERGREEN RE QUIRED EQUIRED 40' I I ea MESIC 00AIRIE SEED Mlx; 50%. NATIVE GRASSES/50S NATN E WILDFLOW ERS BASED ON RE0141RE0 LENGTH OF BUFFER YARD PERIMETER (SEE TABLE BELOW) = 30 = 5 = 15 = 0 = 44 = 12 PROPOSED PLANTINGS _ GS 35 PROPOSED 15 PROPOSED 3 PROPOSED 56 PROPOSED BUFFER FARO REQUIREMENTS LOCATION SCORE POINT REQUIREMENT NORTH BvrFLR YARD EA ST BU FFER YARD .2 135 1 62 SOUTH BU FFER 0400 .1 62 WEST BUFFER YARD .1 62 BUFFER YARD PROPOSED DESIGN: LOCATION PUNTING DESCRIPTION. POINTS EACH POINTS AS PROPOSED NORTH BUFFER YARD 2 OVERSTORY TREES (2.5" CAL. ) 3 EVERGREEN TREE5 (3' TALL) 50, 50 12, 12. 12 136 EAST BUFFER YARD 1 OVERSTORY TREE (2.5' CAL.) 4 M EDIU M DECIDUOUS SH RUBS (24" TALL) 50 3 3 3 3 62 SOUTH BUFFER YARD 1 OVERSTORY TREE (2. 5" CAL. ) 4 MEDIU M DECIDUOUS SH RUBS (24" *ALL) 50 3. 3, 3, 3 62 WEST BUFFER YARD 1 010055OR TREE (2 5" CAL ) 4 MEDIU M DECIDUO US SHRUBS (24" TALL) 3 , 3, 3, 3 62 ALL PLANTINGS WILL BE IRRIGATED WITH A COMBINATION OF ROTARY SPRAY HEADS IN TURF LAWN AREAS AND DRIP HEADS IN PLANTING BEDS AND TREE RINGS. ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM LAWN AREAS 4:1H STEEL EDGING BARRIER. A LL PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. KEY N OTES Ex yEGETADay EDGE v CLYDESD ' LE TRAIL TRAIL CL YDESDALE O SOD • MESIC PRAIRIE SEED MIX OTREE PLANTING: 2.5" CALIPER DECIDU OUS CANOPY TREE OR 6' TALL EVERGREEN TREE aO TREE PLANTING: 3' TALL EVERGREEN TREE O TREE PLANTING; 1. 5" CALIPER DECIDUOUS ORNAMENTAL TREE 0 SHRUB PLANTING. O FBEONCE: ' TL W ITH CHAIN U NK H BLA CK VINYL CO ATING. TOP AND TTOM 6AI eO STEEL EDGING: SEPARATES TURF FROM MAINTENANCE EDGE AND PUNTING BEDS. O IRRIGATION LOCATIONS (APPROXIMATE LSLEFV LOCATION --CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST LOCATIONS FOR ALL SLEEVING TO MAXIMIZE EFFICIENCY. ) O MAINTENANCE STRIP AT BUILDING 66:66:08 WALL; 4' DEEP WASHED FIVER ROCK, SIZE I5"-1.5', WITH LANDSCAPE FABRIC BENEATH: WIDTH OF MAINTENANCE 505:6 VARIES. e PLAYGROUND: EQUIPMENT BY OWNER 12 CONCRETE W ALK e MONUMEN T SIGN: SEE ARCHITECTURAL 0 EX I50NG TREE TO REMAIN ® CATCH BASIN, APPRO0 MATE LOCATION; CONNECT TO DOWNSPOUT AND UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE PIPE. ® DRAINAGE PIPE: 4' PVC PIPE CONNECTING DOWNSPOUTS TO UNDERGROUND CISTERN FOR HARVESTING ROOF RUNOFF O UNDERGROUND CISTERN TO HARVEST RAIN WATER FOR USE IN IRRIGATION SYSTEM. p✓ T.4 Y � :F tt nynq z BBC 2 - Tn 10 GENERAL NOTES Ex vEGETAD ON EDGE 6' FENCE BLACK VINYL -COATED CHAIN LINK S BU64TEND EAST ENO OF FENCE TO ALIGN WITH I •\ LAND5CAPE CONTRACTOR S HALL INSPECT THE S 0E A ND BR, . FAMILI AR WIT H EXISTI NG CONDITIONS RELA,NO TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WOR. LANDSCAPE CONTR ACTOR SH ALL VERIFY PLAN LAYOUT AND DI MENSI ONS SH OWN AND BRING TO THE A TTENTION OF 1TFIE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DISCREP ANCIES WHIC H MAY CO MPR OMISE TITE DESI GN AND/ OR INTE NT OF THE PR OJECTS LA YO UT LANDSCA PE CO NTIRCTO R S MALL ASS URE CO MPLIANCE WIT H APPLAUD. CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVER NING THE WORN AND/OR LAND SCAPE CO NT RACTOR SHALL VE RIFY ALIGNMENT AND LO CATION Of UN DERGRO UN D AND AB OVE GR ADE UTILITIES/IMO NECESSARY PR OTECTIONP A F NI L ry Lu N Ns u rvu RI a CLEA RUNDER GROUND UTILITIES SIM, BE INSTALLE D SO TICAT TRENVIES DO N OT CUT TI RO UOH ROOT SYSTEMS Of EXIS ,N G T REES TO REM AI N LAND SC APE ARCHITECT OF SAME IGNIAF 1,r AND ,(AfDES . irt F PR OP OS ED WA.S . I TMIL S A ND RR ROA DWA YS ARE ELEDEGT MI FIEL D DJ US,P41 1 RE QUIRE D -.C ON FORM TO LONSALIRD T OP OGR APHIC...ONIONS AND TO MI NIMIZE T REE RE MOVAL AND GRADING CHANGES IN T HE ALIG NMEN T AND GR ADES MNIST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE C ONTRACT OR SHALL REVIEW TH E SITE FOR D EFI CI ENCIE S. THE PLR T M ATERIAL SELE CTIONS AND OTHER SITE CONDITION S WHIC H MICR NEGATIVE, ARE, PUNT ESTABLISH MENT SUR., OR WARRANTY U NDESIRABLE PUNT MATERIAL SELECTIONS OR SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TOT, ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCNITECT PRIOR 70 BEGINNING, RORK L ANDSC APE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT REPRODUCAB LE AS.BUILT 0.1.W.R.C. LAN DSCAPE INSTA LLATION IRRI GATION AND SITE I MPROVEMENTS UPON C OMPAETION OF CONSTRUCT .. I NSTALUTION AND FAIOR TO PROJECT ACCEPTANCE NO PLANTS NILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAI GERDING AND C ONSTRUCTI ON HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE REA ANCE, PROVIDE THE HAVE NO V CR OT CHES AND SILRL B EGIN B RANCHING HO LONE R T HAN 3 FEET ABOVE TIIE ROOT BALL STREET AND B OULEVARD TIRES S/ ALL BEGI N BR ANCIFNG NO LOWER THAN 6 ABO VE FI NISPIED GR ADE. LAN DSCAPE CONTRACT OR IS RESP ONSIBLE FOR ONG OI NG M AINTE NANCE OF NEWLY I NSTALLED MATE RIALS U NTIL TI ME OF O RNER ACCE PTANC E ACTS Of VA NDALISM OR DAM AGE WHICH MAY 0 0CR PRIOR 70 OWNER ACC EPTAN CE S HALL BE THE RESP ONSIBILI TY Of 7 HE LA NDSCAPE CO NT RACT,. L ANDSCAPE CONTRA CT OR SHALL WARRA NTY NEW PUNT MATERIAL TH ROU GH °NE CALENDAR TEAR FR OM THE DATE OF THE OWNE R ACCEPTA NCE. NO PA R -11, AC CEPTA NCE WILL BE CO NSIDE RE D. PL ANTING ARE AS 1.11 OVE R STRuCTURERFCEIVI NG O RO,. CORR P ERE NNI AI S ANNU AL S ANOOR MINES SHAM RECEIVE A MINI MUM OF 17 DE P, OE PL ANTIN G SCA CONSISTIN G OF AT L FAST F 5 PARTS T OPSOIL 45 PARTS SCREENE D C OMPOST OR MANURE AND 10 PA RTS SA ND ANNUAL AND PE RENNI 0 PL ANTING BEns 70 RECEIVE , DEEP SH REDDED HA RDWOOD MR Cm WI TH NO ...RIF, SHRUB BED IRSSINGS RECERF DEEP S HRE DDED .om wo om MR CH MT H FIBER MAT N/FED BARR.. REFER 70 CI, FO R SITE DEmOTITI ON INP ORNRTI ON. REFE R 70 C/VIL FO R A DDITIONAL SITE GRADIN G AN D UTILI. I NFO RMATI ON . IF A DISCREPANCY EXISTS BETWEEN THE NU MBER OF PLANTS SH OWN IN THE PLANT MATERIALS SCHEDULE AND THE PLANS THE PLANS SHALL GOVERN CONTRA CTOR SI IALL ST AIR OR L OCA TION OE ALL PR OPOSED TREES FO R A PPR OVAL BE L ANDS CAPE ARCIITECT PRI OR TO INSTALL ATI ON EX APPROX. WETLAND EDG E BASED ON CLYDESDALE MARK ETPLACE FINAL PLAT Ex yXGETAnON EDGE • Ex VEGErAnoN E DGE EX . BIT -1 PATH IRRIGATION NOTES UN DRAP E C ONTRACTOR S ALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR P RO VIDI NN A PE RE OR MANCE I RRI GATION RA N AND SPECIEI CATIONS AS PART OF THE S COPE OF WORM W HEN BIDDING THESE EH. RE A PP RO /ED T HE L ANDSCAPE CON TRACTOR B. DESIG N AND INS, AN UNDERGROUN D SYST EM FOR .RVEST OF RAIN W ATER AS I NDICATED ON P SYSTE M SHALL CO NSIST OF C ATCH BASINS CON NECTE D TO R OOF D RAIN AGE DOWNS POUTS AS INDIC ATED SITE PLA NTI NGS ANY REQUIRED FILT RATION AND P UMPING E DUIPMENT SHALL BE CONSIDERED NCIDENTAL TO T HE DE SIGN AND INSTALLATIO N OF A FULLY E NINCTI ONIN G SYSTE M CONTRAC TOR SHALL SUB MIT SH OP DR AWINGS FO R LANDS CA PE ARCHITECT P RIOR TO BE GINN NG INSTALLATION CO NTR ACTOR SHAI INSTA C/VICH BA RNS AT 6.1 DIN G D OwNSPO UTS AS I NOILATES ON PLA N AL L CATCN BASINS SMILL BE SERE° TO PREVENT LERING ATE,. AND CO NNECTION POINTS MTN A NO V OC SEALER APPR OVED BY LA NDSCA PE ARCHTITE CT -THF SC OPF OF THIS WO RK ALL CONN ECTOR S FI TTI NG S ADHESII. A ND OT HER ACCESSO RIES Sim. BE CO NSI DE RED CONT RACT OR SHALL IN STALL 6. GALL ON UNDERGR OU ND C .TE RN F OR RAIN WATER HAR VEST IN APPR OXIMATE L OCATIO N AS IDE NTIFIED ON PLAN AN D CONN ECT ALL UNDERG ROUND PIPES, IN CLUDING OV ERFLOW,. SUPPLEMENTARY WATER SUPPLY TREES S HRUB A PE RE NNIAL RC S TO BF IR RIGA TED WI TH DRIP IRNIGATO N. SO D TO BF I RRI GATE D WITH S PRAY. APPR OPRIATE TO THE P ROJECT SITF CONDITI ONS ANO 70 NA N, MATER. S GR OIN, PF.X RE MENTS COORDINATE IRRIGATION SLEEMN G LO CATI ONS WITH GENERAL CONTRACT OR RAIN SE NSORS TO BE INCLUDED WIT HIN THE thRIGATI ON DESIGN . IRRIG ATION LIMITS TO EXTE ND TO STREE T B ACK OF C URB. SURVEY NOTES ALL EXISTING CONDITION . S HOWN ON TH. D RAWI NG ARE B ASE D ON AN OWNER,UR NISNED SURVEY 61, GROUP OFFERS NO GUARANTEE E MHER EXPRESSED OR I MPLIED FO R TNE A CCURAR OR RELIASILITY OF T. INDI CATED EXISTING CONDITI ONS T HE C ONT RACTOR SIRLL FIELD A RRA ALL CRITICAL EXISTIN G CONDITI ONS I NCLU DIN G BUT NOT MI MED TO .X::7,1;.f4LIrINoGF,I .LOCA OONS UTILI TY LOC ATIONS A ND INVERT ELEVATIO NS A ND ROSTING SITE GRAD ES PRI OR TO ANL OBSER VED DEVIATI ONS FROM COND MI ONS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE BROUG HT TO THE BKV GROUP A rchitec ture Interio r Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boarinan Kro os Vogel Group Inc. 222 North Second Street Minneap olis MN 5540 Teleph one: 612-339-375: Facsimile: 612-339-621: www.bkvgroup. corr Medina Townh omes Revised Site Plan Appr oval Set 07-15-14 CERTIF1CAllON I h ereby oar* thatdis pW, sp ecification or r epo rt w as prepared by me or under my direct s p ensi on and t at 1 am a ay Lic ens ed Prof 'aul Landsc ape Mrhu ect under the l aws� oftheState of Minnesota . 07-15-14 Date LK ons e Nu mber REVISIO NS N o. DATE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY CO MMISSIO N NO. 07-15-14 BKH Bpi 139073 LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN L10 0 C 2011 BKV Gr oup Inc E OE PLO TTED:7/1520 43,4 :41 PM a IVY SOD LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN 0 11111111111 IIIL!le = iron! LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: OVERSTORY/EVERGREEN TREES RE00060 ORNAMENTAL TREES REQUIRED LOW EVERGREEN SHRUBS RE041R E0 ME51C PRAIRIE SEED MIX; 50% NATIVE GRASSES/50% NATIVE DFLOW ERS BASED ON REQUIRED LENGTH OF BUFFER YARD PERIMETER (SEE TABLE BELOW) 30 = 5 5 = 0 = 44 12 60" t PROP OSED PLANTINGS 3S PROPOSED 15 PROPOSED 3 PROPOSED PR OPOSED ROPOSED EX. VELETA I0ON EDGE BUFFER YARD REQUIREMENTS- LOCATION SCORE POINT REQUIREMENT 135 NORTH BUFFER YARD EAST BUFFER YARD SOUTH BUFFER YARD .2 1 62 .1 62 WEST BUFFER YARD .1 62 BUFFER YARD P60805ED DES11N: LOC4610N PLANTING DESCRIPTION. PO INTS EACH 101615 AS PROPOSED NORTH BUFFER YARD 2 OVERSTORY TREES (2.5" CAL. ) 3 EVERGREEN TREES (3' TALL) 50, 50 12 136 EAST BU FFER YA RD 1 OVERSTORY TREE (2. 5 CAL) 4 MEDIUM 000100025 SHRUBS (24' TALL) 50 3 j_ 3 3 62 SOUTH BU1F08 8 060 1 OVERSTORY TREE (2.5" CA L. ) 4 MEDIUM DECIDUOUS 588085 (24" TALL) 50 3, 3, 3, 3 62 WEST 800100 YARD 1 O VERSTO RY TREE (2. 5" CAL.) 4 MEDIUM 000100035 STRUTS (04" TALL) 50 3 3 3 3 62 ANNUAL AND PERENNIA L RANT. BEDS TO RECEIVE, DEEP SHREDDED HARDWO OD M ULCH wnH NO WEED BAR RIER. ALL PLANTINGS WILL BE RR1GATED WITH A COMBINATION OF ROTARY SPRAY HEADS IN 128E LAWN AR EAS AND DRIP HEADS IN PLA NTING BEDS AND TREE RINGS. SHRUB UBr BED 9 M ASSINGS 80RECEIVE nary DEEP SHREDDED H ARDWOOD M610H WITH FIBER MA T NEE BA RRIER. REF TE ALL PL4NTING BEDS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM LAWN AREAS WITH STEEL EDGING BARRIER. REFER ro CIVIL FOR ADDITIONAL SITE GI IOIrvD AM D VTOTH *308)441104 ALL PLANTING BEDS SH A L BE 41'330000 W ITH SHREDDED HARDW OOD LIULCH IP A DISCREPANCY EXISTS BETWEEN THE NUM BER OF PLANTS SHOWN IN mF n A NT UA TERIA LS SCH EMA F arO TH E BANS TH E PLANS SH ALL GO VER N. GENERAL NOTES ROAD B CLYDESDALE TRAIL I...p . IRRIGATION NOTES LA ND SCA PE CON TRAC TOR SH ALL IN SPEC T THE SIT E AN D BEC OME F ANIL. WITH EX ISTING CO NDITIO NS R ELATING TO THE .TURE AND SCOPE OF WORK LANDSCAP E CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RES PONSIBLE F OR PROVIDIN G A PERFORMA NCE IR RIGATI ON PLAN AND ANDSCAPF CO NTRACTOR SHAi I VEER, IL AN I AWA IT AND DIM ENSIONS SHOWN AN D BRING TO TH E ATTENTION THE I ANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SPECIF ICA TIONS. PART OF THE SCOPE OE WORK WHEN BIDDING TH ESE SH ALL BE APP RO VED BY THE UN DSC APE DISCREPANCIES wH ICH MA, COM PROMISE TH E DESIGN AND -O R INTENT OE THE PROJECTS LA YO UT. AR CH ITECT P PUOR TO ORDER ANDOR INSTAL UTON BE THE L ANDSCAPE CONTEGLTO RS RESPONSIBILITY TO INSUR E SODDED /SE ED ED MD R ANTE D ARP As PRF IRRIGATED PR,ERL ,L=SZ ILCurplIA 0CIO R SHAI L ASSURE COMP , NCE W ITH APPLIC AKE CODES A ND REGUL ATIONS GOVERNING THE WO RK ANDOR CONTRACTOR DESIG N AND INSTALL AN UNDERGROUND SYSTEM F OR H ARVEST OF RAIN WATER AS I NDICATED ON PLAN. SYST EM SHALL CONSIS T OE CATCH BASINS CONNECTED TO R OOF DRAIN AGE DOWN SPOUTS AS INDICAT ED LAND SCAPE CO NTRACTO R SI IAL L PRO TECT EXISTIN G RO ADS. CDRBSIG UTTERS, TRAILS TREES. LAWNS ANO SITE ELEMENTS DURING ON PLA N UNDERGRO UND PIBNG AS INDICATED ON P. -A N AN U ND ERGR OUN D STCRAGE CISTE RN AS INDI CATED ON CON STRUCTIO N O PERATION S. DAMA GE TO SAM E SHA LL BE REPA IR ED AT NO ADDITO NAL COST TO THE O WNER. PLAN OV ERFLO W AND SUP PLEMENTARY WATER SUPP., AS REWIRED TO PRO,DE WATER NEEDED TO IRRIGATE ALL LA NDSCAPE CO NTRACTO R SHALL VERIFY ALIGNM EN T AND L °C ANO N Of UN DERGRO UN D A ND ABOVE GRA . UTILITIES AND PROVID E TH E DESIGN AND INST AI I ANON OE A BILLY FUNCTIONING SYSTEM CONTR ACT OR SH AL 1 SLA NG S HOP D RAWI NGS FO R NECESSAR Y PRO TECGON FOR SAME B EFORE CONSTRU CTION MA TER IAL IN STALLATION BEGIN S ININ IMUM 10-0. CLEA.N CEI. I AND SC A PE ARC HITECT PRIOR TO BEG IN NIN G IN STAL I ,TION.. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO 7.T TR ENCHES DO NO T CU-II- 11E10U . R0 07 SYSTEM S OE ANT EXISTING -TREES, CONTRA CTOR SHAL L INSTALL C ATCH BA SINS A7 BUR DING DONNSP OMTS AS INDICATED ON PLAN ALL CAT CH BASINS RILALL BE SEALED TO PREVENT LEMING Al,. AND CONNECTION POINTS WITH A NO VOC SEAL EP APPRO VED BY E XISTING C ONTOURS. TRAILS. V EGETATION. C URB/GUTTER AND OTHER ELEMENTS ARE BASED UPON INFO...DOI:50,0ED TO THE LANDSCAP E ARCIFITECT. UNDSC APE AR C, T ECT BY OTHERS. LANDSCAP E CONTRACT. SHALL VERIFY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR 70 CONSTRUCTIO N AND NOT , I ANOSOAPE A RLO TEC, OF SAN, CONTRACTOR SHAL INSTAL I a. DIA PVC DRA IN AG E PIPE CONN ECTING OCA RNSP011 S. TO uNDERGROUNDLISTERN FOR RAIN W ATER .RVEST . INDICATED ON PLAN LOC ATIONS SHOWN ON PLAN A RE EDP ILLUST RATION .1., i'070g1=C?P 'gZa7C717ECIZO'N'SE/LZAT(11Z1=1P'ErREMS=P'ArG. '=E5tg Trrr/rNI'AFInU NIDTRZETIZr' OR T DETERMINE FINAL LOC ATION AN D O UAN TITES FO R ALL UNDERGR OUND DRAI NA GE PIPE A NO OR ISPESPO.IBLE FOR COORDINA TING LOCAT ION, DPUIN PIPE TO A VOID CONFLI CTS WI TH OTHE R .001.0.0 UT, IRES 41. C ON NECT.S FITTIN GS ADH ESIVE A ND O THER ACCESS ORIES SHALL BE CONSIDERED `47g..=-M71,-ZsA 7%Lc7rprg',-7E7r:BTL=T=ON F:MiZZYrr"'SL "TP',1, 4'"'i N ANA% 'ETIl'AEF""-Ej'D' OirStI-E INCIDEN TAL AN D APE INCLU DED IN THE SCORE OF TIRE nADRIL CON DITIO NS SHALL BE BRO UG HT TO THE ATTE NTION OF THE LAN DSCAPE ARCHI7ECT PRIOR 70 BEGINN. OF WO RK. CO NTRACTOR SHAL L INST ALL CNC GALLON UNDER GROU ND C ISTERN FOR RA IN WATER G AFFE s 7 IN A PPROGNA TE I WAD. AS ID ENTIF IED ON PI AN A ND C ONNEC T A LL UN DE RG ROUN D PIPES. ING LLANO MERE. OW AND UND SUPE CON TRA CTOR L PREPARE AND SuBM I7 REPRO DUCIBI F AGSVILT DR AWING S, OF LANDSCARE INS, A L A TION IR RIGATIO N .0 SOP, EMEN TARY WATER S., Y. ME IM PROV EM ENTS UPO N COM, F LIO N OE CONSTRUCBO N INSTAI I ANO N AND PRIOR TO PR OJEC T ACCEPTANC E. TR EE S. SHRUB 6 PERENNIAL BEDS TO BE IRR IG ATED WITH D RIP IRRIG ATIO N SO O 70 BE IR RIGATED WITH SP., NO PLANTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRA DING AND CO NSTRUCTION .5 BEEN CO MPLETED IN TRE IMM EDIATE AR EA PROP OSE D PLA NT MATERIAL SH ALL COM PLY WITH THE LATEST EDITIO N OF THE AM ERICAN STANDARD F. NURSERY STOCR. ANSI TEO, UNDSCAPE CO NTRA CTO R SHA LL PRO VIDE THE O WNER W ITH A WATERIN GLAWN IRRIGA TIO N SCHEDULE 'ar:Ore7FO'TC=AZ ;;ITLMTNr eITN G'NLO IA01'VEA;TLEHA VECEErAVO' V;7H :PROCOTALHLE%L'A=ALZUISTZET- AP PROPRIATE TO TH E PROJE CT SITE CO NDITION S AND TO PUNT MATERIALS GROWTH REQ UIREMENTS. C OORDINATE IRRIGATI. SL FEL T. LOCA TION S MTH G ENER AL CONTRACT.. SHALL BEGIN Bruno.. NO LO WER THAN 8' ABOV E FINISHED G RAD E LAN DSC AP E CONTRACTOR_ PLAN, T I.IRA ETERIA L TH ROU GH O NE CALEN DAR LEA R F RON TH E DATE TNE OWNER PLANING A REAS INO T OVER STR UCTUR E, RECEIVIN G G ROUND CO VER PERENNIALS ANNUALS A ND,. VINES SH ALL RECEIVE A M INIMU M 0, .2T DEP TH OE PLANT ING SO IL C ONSISTIN G OE AT LEAST aS PA RT S TO PSOIL AS PA RTS SCREENED COMP OST OR MANURE A ND .0 PAR TS SAND C ONTRACTO R SH AL I STAK E O UT O CAGON OF Ai P ROPOSED TREF S FOR A PPROVA L By AN DSCA PE ARCHITECT PR IOR TO INSTAI I ATIO N RA IN SENS.S TO BE INCI UD ED viDHIR THE IRRIGATION DESIGN. IRR IGATION LIMITS TO EXTEND TO STREET BACK OF C uBS SURVEY NOTES AIL ExISTING CONDITIONS S HOWN ON TNS DRA IN, A RE BASED ON AN OWNER -EU RNISH ED SUR VE Y BIG , GRO UP O FFERS NO G UARANTEE EGG ER EXPRESSED OR IMP LIED FOR THE ACCURAC, OP RELIABILITY THE INDICATED EXISTING CONDITIONS THE C ONTRAC TO R SHA LL F IELD VE RIF, ALL CRIT ICAL EXISTIN G CON DITIO NS IN CLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO EX IST ING BU ILDING LOC ATIONS URI, LOCAT IONS AND IN VERT ELEV ATION S AND FASTIN G SITE GRADES P RIOR TO THE START OF WM,. �''•j, E X. VEGETATION EDGE j BUCKH / VINYL -COATED CAIN -411 Ci14/ LINK EXIS nNc BunDNG EX A PP RO X. WETLAND EDGE BASED ON CLYDESDALE MARKETPLACE FI NAL PLAT £ VEx LETA l7OIy EDGE EX. VEGETATION EDGE EX. BIT PT H PROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE QTY. SYN COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME ME TYPE CO MMENTS CANOPY TREES(20 TOTAL) 6 A PRINCETON ELM 5 B SWAMP WHITE OAK 9 C MAJESTY SUGAR MAPLE Ul mus encria1 a'Pnew1c Ouemus bicolor Acer saccha mm'Flax Mir 25' CAL BBB 2.S' CAL B88 25' CAL B&8 PLANT PER PLAN PLANT PER PLAN PUNT PER PLAN EVERGREEN TREES (55 TOTAL LARGE F 3 SMALL) 3 D 60)100 PINE 2 E WHITE PINE 13 F NORWAY SPRUCE E mus sllcbu5 P'ilws snob:, 8145 Boos 3 CONT. 0 BBB 6' B&B PUNT PE R PL AN PUNT PER PLAN PLANT PER PLAN ORNAMENTAL TREES )15 TOTAL) 3 G AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY A m5Nnchler x gran 41tbra'Autumn Bihar. ' 4 H DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH Betua 4atyphyie 'Fargo 0 I HARVEST GOL D CRABAPPLE Ma'u5'Harv851 Gold 16 CAL B&B 1.6 CAL. B&B 1 5' CAL BBB PANT PER PLAN PLANT PER PLAN PANT PER PLAN 516280 56 TOTAL) 6 J SEM SORBARIA 3) K MISS KI M LILAC 13 L MANEY JUNIPER Sorbana 5ordr0la 'Se m' Syrnga patue 'Mos Khi 14611 005Chl8065$ 'Merseyi 24' TALL MIN . CONT . 24" TALL M IN. CONT. 24' TALL MIN. CONT . PUNT PER PLAN PLANT PERPLAN PL440 PE R PLAN BKV GROUP Architectur e Int eri or Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Bo atm an K roos Vog el Group Inc . 222 North Sec ond Street Minneap olis MN 55401 Telephone: 612-339-3752 Facsimile: 612-339-6212 www.bk vgroup .c om Medina Townh omes Revised Site Plan Appr oval Set 07-15-14 CERTIRCAT1 ON !h ereby was by .9 c ereN that this edr�on or'report wpr epared by me or u ncle- my dic e supervisi on and that 1 ern a duly Li onised Pm->nar , Ladrape Architect under th e laws of the Stat e o/ Minn esota. 07-15-14 Date --kke ne Number REVISI ONS N o. DATE DATE DR AWN BY CHECKED BY COM MISSION NO . 139073 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN L101 0 2011 BKV Gr oup, Inc E OE CONT RIDGE V ENT IRv .1) SHAKE SIDING (SW 5) ASP HALT SHIN GLES ,ASR - ALU M FASCIA iSMF-21 W/,OFF (RV 2) ALU M G UTTER (SMF,)D,_W/ ROU RE6IN-RLACE SPLASH BLOCK ,x6 CO RNER BO ARDS LAP SIDING SDG -2) 1,0 TRIM wRA R wINUw(=_ AND DO OR S W/ 1.x.6 TRIM TW FGA EGRICK FGB-1) RG ADS 26 BUILDING 1 - WEST ELEV (TYP BLDGS 1,4,9) CO NT RIDGE VENT (RV -1) A SPHAL T SHING LES ,ASR -1) SH AKE SIDING ISD GS) {A av z, FA SCIA (SMF-2) W/ SOFFIT ALUM GU TT ER ,SMF_,IDS. w, POURE0.iNPLACE SPLA SH BLO CK 1. CO RNER BO ARDS LA P SIDING (8DG2) 1,0 TRIM KASO TA S TO NE C OLUMN BASE CAP TYR. BR ICK,FB,) SIDES FACING STREETS WRAP WINDOWS AND DOORS VV/ ,x6 TRIM TVR BUILDING 1 - NORTH ELEVATION (TYP BLDGS 1,4,9) CON T RIDGE V ENT (RV -1) - ASPH ALT SHINGLES (ASR -1) ALUM. FASO (RV -2) 1r6 CORNEA BOARDS AP WINDOWS AND DOORS VV/ 1x6 TRIM TVP . SHA KE SIDING ,SDGS) FIT 1x 10 TRIM ER ISMF-,)'AI W/ Po uREo-waLACESRLasN eLoc K KASOTA STON E COLUMN BASE CAP (STN 1) TYP. BR ICKFA CE ECIN Ar ON SIDES G STREET O VERHEAD GARAGE DO OR III -'-I-IsnIns I--1-1m alra�lr•Ir•Ir•Ir•Ir•Ir.l�_ -1- r. r.I.I�ir•,�Ir l <. .41111 ris,ImirsKss. BUILDING 1 - EAST ELEVATION (TYP BLDGS 1,4,9) CO NT RIDG E VENT (RV , ) SHAKE SIDING ocs ) ASPHAL T SHING LES ,ASR -1) ( "'A( av Ml uM G UTTER (SINE-,) D. s. w/ F WRE0.1NR lA CE SRASH BLOCK x6 COR NER BOARDS - LAP SIDING (SDG -2) 1,0 TRIM CEEIGK (FB„ qJ >IDEE FAC ING STREE TS WRAP WINDO WS AND DOORS x6 TRIM TYP KASO TA STON E CO LUMN B ASE CAP,STN,) rw_ 1/2 BUILDING 1 - SOUTH ELEVATIO N (TYP BLDGS 1,4,9) 26 TRL ,BEARING �Icci=cl==1==1==1==1==1==1=-1 mm•IMI I=I MIIMIIlIfIM[MM'f •I ,IniImlmimim1oo1osUsa1ss '= wiIaslIsalasilmimimIm1 - I.I�I.I-I�I�1-1.I-I-- -I-II•l�i•I-I•I-�I_ __ 26, 6 HEEL E EVATIO N TRUW. EABIN ' $ HEEL ELEVATION TRUSS BEgl TYR Lot HEELELE'A9 -aT J }� ROOF LEVEL - BUILDING 1 (TYP BLDGS 1,4,9) 365/8 227 in 6 e 7/s" 1 5 w 1111111111111 LEVEL 02 - BUILDING 1 (TYP BLDGS 1,4,9) LEVEL 01 - BUILDING 1-(TLDGS 1,4,9) 1/2 111 C�� (! 1=I@III1I 11111111 I 111111111111111 eilmemiermiom i BKV GROUP Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boo rman Krooa Vogel Group Inc. 777 North Sec ond Street Minneapolis MN 55401 Telephone: 612-339-3752 Facsimile: 612-339-6212 www.bkvgr oup.com 110. #41119 DOMINIUM IBs0'REVISED SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET 07-02-2014 PROJECT TITLE Medina Townhomes KEY PLAN N ORTH ARROW CERTIFIC ATI ON I h ereby certify that th is plan sp ecificati on or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional und er the laws of the State of Minnesota. c 14209 License Number 04-25-2014 Date REVISION DATE D ATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSI ON NO. SHEET TITLE 0 0-07.2019 'NAB CEP MN 1393 73 BUILDINGS 1, 4, 9 PLANS & EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A101 © 2014 BKV Group Inc. EOE C ONT RID GE VENT ( RV -1) C OMP SHAKE SI DIN G (SDG5) AS PHALT SHINGLES ( ASR -1) C OMP. L AP SIDI NG ) SDG2) ,A4 2; FASCIA TSME2) WI S OFFIT ER(SMF-1)05 W, P DDRE D IN PL ACE SPLASH BLaK C ORNER BDs . ,xd WDELKG, 1 ,0 WD-BLKO1 W/ S ME-2 WP WPM,'A ND DO OR MD xe D-BLKG-1 W, S MF-2 TYP. g5 (SONS .� DL DMNBASE COMP L AP SIDING (S DCH21 BUILDING 2 & 3 WEST ELEVATION 0T RIDGE VENT (RV -1) ASP HALT SH ING LES IASR-1) COMP SHAKE SIDING (503-5) CO MP LAP SIDING (SDG -2) U2FASCIA (SMF-2( WI SC0FIT ) WRA P N OW AND DOO R W/1 ES CO RNER DO S tx E WDBLKG, ALUM M G UTTER (SMF, D ,MI POU RED -IN -RACE SFUSH BLOC K CO MP LAF' DING SDG2) CAP(s�1) EPaDMN SSE FACE BRICK FP -E OVERHEAD GARA GE DOOR 2,10 HFFLEL_,0TII 4 TS Usse aaw c h. 544-,5 5H a• 4 s -� _ - -. T-I-TI-l•=r-T -TT-J-1 -I. Ara BUILDING 2 & 3 SOUTH ELEVATION CO NT RIDG E VEN T (93-1) CO MP �ISHAKE SID ING (500-5) C A LUM FASC IA (SM F-2) W, SOFFIT (RV 2) PO URED r PLACE SPAASH BLOC COMP- LAP SIDING )SD G-2) CORN ER WS tv6 WDBLKGI WI SM F-2 1,0 WD-BLKG1 W/ SMF-2 KASO TA ONE CO LUMN BASE CAP,STra1) TYP. WO-BLK MOWAN D POO R PIPP. BUILDING 2 & 3 NORTH ELEVATION 118" = 1-0 HEELEL00HTI ON J� 9-D Y TRLS-110,4 57 4 LEVEL p HEEL ELEVATI ON 4 TRUSS B A RING 4 „D°SL,00 4 DS z0 �i CO NT RIDGE VENT (RV 1) CO MP. SHAKE SIDING (SD GS) ASPH ALT SHING LES ASR -1 ) CO MP LA P SIDING (SOG2) IRv M FA S CIA (SM F-2) V:, SO FFIT CORNER BDs lwwo-eLKG1 I 1x10 WD-BLKG, W, SMF-2 uM o0 ER(SM F.1) D, S. 00 Po uR IN -PLACE SPusH BLo c FACE BRICK (501) COM P LAP SIDING (SOU -1) KASO TA STO NE CAP (STN -1) CO LUMN BASS D DOOR Wn.D BUILDING 2 & 3 EAST ELEVATION LELEV AT-6 50005 00151 GING 4 0x14 LEVEL 02 - BUILDING 2 & 9 22-1,1a SEE S HEET q_02 LEVEL 01 - BUILDING 2 & 9 • S, zS HEET IN OM SEE SHEE02 29 „a ROOF AB OVE SEE SHEET A.222 is (v .P.1>- SEE S HE SEES EE°ATD2 o -- L 2.2 2.3 P REFINISHED META* GU TTER 500 PREF WISHE D METAL GIERER -TYP VALLEY FLASHIN G- TYP BKV GROUP Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Bowma n Kroos Vogel Gro up Inc 222 North Sec ond Street Minneapolis MN 55401 Teleph one: 612-339-3752 Facsimil e: 612-339-6212 www .bkvgr oup.c om DOMINIUM IssulREVISED SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET 07-02-2014 PR OJECT TITLE Medina Townhomes KEY PLAN NORTH ARR OW CERTIFICATION I hereby certify th at this plan, specification or report was prepar ed by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a d uly Licensed Professi onal under the laws of th e State of Minnesota . 17 14209 Licens e Number 04-25-2014 Date REVISION DATE DATE DRAW N BY CHE CKED BY C OMMISSION NO. SHEET TITLE 07-02-2014 TMB CAP MN 1203 BUILDING 2 AND 3 PLANS & EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET NU MBER A102 ROOF LEVEL - BUILDING 2 & 3 © 2014 BKV Group. Inc . EOE T RIDGE VENT (RV-„ ASPHA LT SHINGLES (A SR -1) COM P. SHAKE SIDING (505-5) CO MP LA P GI 2 M FASCIA ISM F-2) WI SO FFIT (RV -2) 1x 10 w DBIH Gt VV SM F2 VVRAP WD w AND DO,R VII 115 VVDb LKG1 W/ SMF-2 TSP. CORNER BPS 1,6 VVEKBLKG-1 M 2 ER (SL -1) OS. Wr PO URE61rv�L BLO CK COMP LAP SIDIN G ISM -2i KASO TA STO NE COLU MN BASE CAP N-1), TYR. SIDES FACING)STREE rS O VERHEAD GA RAGE POO R CON T RIDG E VENT IRV-1) COM P SHAK E SID ING ISDG -5) ASPHALT SHINGLES (A SR -1) CO MP LA PSIDING (SDG2 ALUM FASC IA(SMF-2)Wr SOFFIT (RV -2) CO RN ER MS, 1rtwIIBU(GI W/SMF-2 1,0 SVP .BLKG -1 WI SMF-2 BUILDING 5 FRONT ELEVATION UTTER�SMF-,)D.SWi CURED-II�LPIAC E SPLASH BLOC K FACE BRICK (F61) CO MP. LAF SONG ISM -2) KASO TA STO NE CO LUMN BASE C AP ISTN TYP WRAP WPW AN D DOO R WH, 6 WD,BLKG1 WrSMF-2 T.P 26 EE BUILDING 5 SIDE ELEVATION CS N TRU SS BEAR IN G i-rl`g 141L4- LEVE L o SONS RIDGE VEN T IR V-1) COMP. SHA KE SIDING ISM -51 ASP HALT SHIN GLES (ASR -1) ALUM. FA (SIAM) (S) Wr SOFFIT G UTTERALUM (S MF-1) as. W/ PO URED -IN -PLACE SPLA SH BLO CK CO MP. LAP SIDIN G (SOG2) WrCORNER BP S, 1x5 W6BLKG 1910 wo-BLKG- 1wrSMF-2 FACE BR A. KASOTA STONE COLUMN BASE CAP (STN -1) MP. AP MN/ A ND DOO R V✓/16 W D %xG1 w/ SMF-2, T W. BUILDING 5 REAR ELEVATION H EEL ELEVATIO N 119 6 TRUSS BEARING -1" e�z-3 SS 16-0 o Y Li T nom'® al i ag el $g 1 - oT/6 LTA e �si -Y f, t '. I oS-0 BRE 3BRDM I"�1 f I q WAL ABO VE -,1 16- 11 3 RO C 5.1 5.2 a 5 .3 LEVEL 01 - BUILDING 5 RE, LEVEL 02 - BUILDIN G 5 BKV GROUP A rchitecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boa rman Kroos Vogel Group Inc . 222 N orth Sec ond Street Minneapolis MN 55401 Teleph one: 6 12-339-3752 Facsimile: 612-339-6212 www .bkvgr oup.c om *if DOMINIUM ISSU,REVISED SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET 07-02-2014 PROJECT TITLE Medina Townhomes KEY PLAN NORTH ARROW CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, speafication or r eport was pr epared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 14209 Licens e Number 04-25-2014 Date REVISION DATE DATE DR AWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NO. SHEET TITLE 0Tm-2014 Amhsr Ch eck er 1393]3 BUILDING 5 PLANS & ELEVATIONS SHEET NU MBER A105 ROOF LEVEL - BUILDING 5 © 2014 BKV Group Inc , EOE C ONT RID GE VENT (PV 1) LAP SI DID,2) ASPHAL T SHIN GLES (ASR -1) SHAKE SIDEN G (SD., IRV-2) ALU M GU TTER ISMF -t) D,S. Wi P OURED-I,FLA CE SPLASH BLOCK WRA P WI NDOWS A hO DOORS W, 1. TRIM TY ➢. FACE BRICK (00-1) KASOTA ONE C OLUMN BASE CAP (STN -1), T YP_ O VERHEAD GARAGE D OOR (OHo-1) CO NTR IDG E VEN T (R V_1) A SPHALT SHINGLES ,ASR -1) SHAKE SIDING ISDG 51 LAP SIDING (SOG- 2) ALUM FASC IA (SM F-2) W, SOFFIT (RV 2) gBUILDING 6 WEST ELEVATION PCUP G UTTER ACEFS LASH BLO CK 'WC TRIM WRI, WIND OWS 1. TRIM NP FACE BRICK (FBL BUILDING 6 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATION UNIT C„NT RIDGE V EN T (R V -1) ASPHALT SHING LES (ASR-, LA P SIDING W2) ALUM FA SCIA ISMF JM GU TTER 1SMF,D.B WI PCOREOINRA CE SP LA SH BLOC 1,0 TRIM WR AP WINDGNS AND DO ORS w, +6 TRIM TYR. FACE BRIC K (FELT O BUILDING 6 EAST ELEVATION ��iuR va6 Et 5 6 L6v EL �2 tip Tius : Ba so 6 .1 LEVEL 01 - BUILDING 6 ,6 =1-D gROOF LEVEL - BUILDING 6 BKV GROUP Architectur e Interior Design Landscape Architect ur e Engineering yBy oo� am�tm�a n ICroo • Vogel Gr oup Inc 222 North Second Stre et Min neapolis MN 55401 Teleph one: 612-339-3752 Facsimile: 612-339-6212 www .bkvgroup.com DOMINIUM ISS''REVISED SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET 07-02-2014 PROJECT TITLE Medina Townhomes KEY PLAN N ORTH ARROW CERTIFICATION I h ereby certify that this pl an, speelficae on r report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Prof essional under the law s of the Stat e of Minn esota . �i� 14209 License Number 04-25-2014 Date REVISION DATE DATE DRAW N BY CHECKED BY CO MMISSIO N NO. SHEET TITLE 0]02-^_014 Checker 139:.'3 BUILDING 6 PLANS & ELEVATIONS SHEET NU MBER A106 © 2014 BKV Group, Inc. EOE STON E VEN EER CHIMN EY CCN T RIDG E VENT (RV.1) ASPHALT SHINGLES (ASR. SHAKE SIDIN G (S00-5) ALU M FASCIA (SMF-21W/ SO RER (Rv .2) ER (SMF-1(D S. W/ rouRBo-lNCLacE sPLASH aLo c 1. COR NER BOARDS 1,0 TRIM FACE BRICK (FB. 1) AD WINDOWS AND 1. TRIM TYP LA P S DI AG -2) CLUB HOUSE NORTH ELEVATION cl,�e�,� sx rac STO NE VENEER CHIMNEY SHAK E SIDING . DG -51 ASP HA LT SHINGL ES (ASR -7 ALUM FA SCIA (SMF-1 , W/SOFFIT (RV -2) v v10 TRIM UM GU TTER (SMF•ti D.S. W/ POURED -IN -PLACE SPLA SH BLOC 1x6 CORNER BOARDS FA CE BRICK (F.1( VVRAP ...WS AND DOO RS LAP SIDING RIMpDG-2) CLUB HOUSE EAST ELEVATION yEVFL 51$ STO NE VENEER CHIMNEY CON T RDG E GE, (RV 1( ASPHALT SH INGLES (ASR -1( S NAKE SIDING (SDG5) ALUM A s_IA . MF-2) w/ SO FFIT (RV -2j UM GUTTER (SMF-1 LA S W/ ROUFED-IN-PLACE SPLASH BLO CK 1. CORNER BOARDS 1 y 10 TR IM FACE BRICK (FB- 1 WRAP TS AND DOCK S 1. RIM T LAP SIDING (SDG -2) ()CLU B HOUSE SOUTH ELEVATION = T -0' 7. 0 STONE VENEER CHIM NEY FO NT RIDGE VEN T (RV 1) A SPHALT SHIN GLES (ASR -1( SHAKE SID IN G(5.51 ALUM FASCIA (SMF-2,, WI SO FFIT (RV 2) ALU M GUTTER (SMF-1( D.S.'WI POURE0.1N-PLACE SPLASH BLOCK 1. CO RNER BOARDS 1x10TRW FACE BRICK (001) nPWRN SAND DOO RS T. NAP SIDING (SLG.2, CLUB HOUSE WEST ELEVATION CI ogrVz' LEv 0" R. 1' b' 04 7.0 CD 7. 3 8-4 aC 0 r lOs NO TE: SEE A205 FOR INTERIOR ELEVATIO NS AND FINISHES CLU Ro AA BA „FF,,,,,Eno LOA M OB M AIN T 109 ROO F ABOVE __� we TIEULE t01 O FFICE I15 TO ILET 104 OIL 1 0. MANAG ER OFFIC E SL ILIIIL uunnuu,llwu wwn unu uuuu mnu uwl,uuul Ds w w a 10 z1 to BUILDING 7 - CLUB ROOM FLOOR P N Roof Level - Club House Ira =T-0 7.A CH IMNEY PREFINISHED MET AL GUTTER TYP . COF ITC JOE PITCH ea gs RIDGE VENT TYP, 6 ROOF PITCH VALLEY FL AS HIN G-T YP A10 14209 BKV GROUP Archite cture Interio r Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Bo wman Kroos Vogel Group Inc . 222 North Sec ond Street Minneapolis MN 55401 Telephone: 6 12-339-3752 Facsimile: 612-339-6212 www.bkvgr oup .c om DOMINIUM Issu)REVISED SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET 07-16-2014 PROJECT TITLE Medina Townhomes KEY PLAN NORTH ARROW CERTIFICATION I hereby c ertify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professi on al under the laws of th e State of Minnesota . 04-25-2014 License Number Date REVISION DATE DATE DR AWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSI ON N O. SHEET TITLE Or -15-2014 MN 1393 11 BUILDING 7 PLANS & EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A107 © 2014 BKV Group, Inc . EOE C ONT RIDGE VENT (RV) ASPHALTSHIN GLES (A SHAKE SIDIN G (SOLO -5) BRACE 9RD.5. W/ ro uREo-N.PL sH accK ALUM F ASCIA(S MF-2 W/ SOFFIT V2) 1. CORNER BOARDS pP v.,NW.N'S AM DO O RS W11. TRI M 1), LAP SIDIN G SO G t) "MO TRIM KAS OTA ST ONE C OLUMN BASE CAP TYR FACE BRICK (F&1) ED BUILDIN G 8 SOUTH ELEVATI ON C ONT RIDGE VENT (RAM) ASPHALT SHIN GLES (ASR -1) SHAKE SIDI NG ( SD G-5, ARUM FA SCI IS MF-aw/soFRP LAP SIDING is, 1) x6 C ORN. B OARDS 1 ,C TRIM POUM GUTTER (SMF-1) D.S . W/ RED -IN -PLACE SPLASH BL OCK W RAP WINDO WS AND DOOR S W/ 1.6 TRIM T VP KAs oSA ST cTE caUMN BASE AP,STN-,) T, P_ FACE BRICK (FB-, ) L AP SIDING 150 0-1) 21 0 BUILDING 8 WEST ELEVATION HEEL ELE VATIO N TPUSSBEA RI HEELE'EV'TIIXJ Lelv „E±. o' LEVEL6t B6 0 26 -10 1 n' CO OT RIDG E VEN T (RV -A ASPHALT SHINGLE S )ASR -1) SHAKE SIDING (SOG-5) ALUM FAS CIA WI SO FFIT (RV. 2) LAP SIDING )S0C-2) 1.6 CO RNER BO ARDS VVRAP WINDO WS AND DOO RS WI ,x P ALUM GU TTER 1505-1, as. W/ P]UREPINYLA CE SP LA SH BLOCK LAP SIDING ‘SDG-21 1.10 TRIM KA SOTA STONE COLUMN BASE C AP (STN -1) nP FACE BR ICK (55-1) BUILDING 8 NORTH ELEVATION C ONT PIDG E V ENT (RV - 1) ASPHALT SHINGLES (ASR -1) SHAKE SIDING (SD0-5) ALUM. F ASCIA (SM F-2) W/ SOFFIT UM GUTTER )5,-1) O. S. W/ rouREPIN- RACE SPLA SH BLO CK "x6 CO RNER BO ARDS LAP SIDING (5 IX,I WRAP WIN DOWS AND DO OR 1.6 TRIM TTP FACE KA SO TA A STO NE CO L UMN LUMN BASE OAP (STN ),). TVP. BUILDING 8 EAST ELEVATION HEEL ELEVATION 9'-6 TR USS 05001 !G t,o02 �si16 LE VEL 6,.. oo.a PREEINIS HED METAL GUTTER -TVP ROOF LEVEL - BUILDING 8 -� I � - - i HEET - ill .01 � ® �������� .01 ■un�ii B, ® LEVEL 02 - BUILDING 8 LEVEL 01 - BUILDING 8 O„5 =,a BKV GROUP Architecture Interior Desig n Landscape Architecture Engin eering Bo orman Kroos Vogel Group Inc. 222 North Second Street Min neap olis MN 55401 Telephone: 612-339-3752 Facsimile: 612-339-6212 www.bkvgr oup.com 4111, DOMINIUM IssulRE VISED SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET 07-02-2014 PROJECT TITLE Medina Townhomes KEY PLAN NORTH ARROW CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specificati on or report was prepared by me or under my dir ect supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Prof essional und er the law s of the Stat e of Minn esota. ie 14209 License Number 04-25-2014 Date REVISION SHEET TITLE DATE 67-02,014 Cnecker 1393 73 BUILDING 8 PLANS & EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET N UMBER A108 © 2014 BKV Gro up , In c. EOE BKV ELECTRICA L LUMINAIRE FIXTURE SCHEDULE NEW 26 UNITS ID FIXTURE TYPE MO UNTING VOLTS LAM P CONTOL M EDIA (LENS. LOUV ERS, ETC.) DESCRIPTION M ANUFACTURER SERIAL NUMBER NOTES QTY WATTS TYPE XP OVERHEAD AREA ROADWAY SING LE HEAD 20' EXTERIOR PO LE 120 V 1 75 W LED/4000K FLAT GLASS LENS -FULL CUTOFF TYPE 3 DISTRIBUTION LITHONIA MR1-LED XP1 OVERHEAD AREA ROAD WAY SINGLE HEAD 15' EXTERIOR POLE 120 V 1 75 W LED/4000K FLAT GLASS LENS -FULL CUTOFF TYPE 3 DISTRIBUTION LITHON IA MR 1-LED XU EX TERIO R UPLIGHT SIGNLIGHT ABOVE G RADE 120 V 1 10 W LED FLOOD AND SPOT REFLECTORS INCLUDED, BLACK FINISH FLAB LIGH TING HBLED SERIES XW EX TERIOR BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHTING BUILDING MO UNTED 120 V 1 12 W LED BRONZE HO USING RA B LIG HTING SLIM 12N/PC (PHOTO CELL) ' 0. 0 '0 0 C 0 '0. 0 0 . 0 'C . 0 '0 0 '0 0 ' 0. 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 0 '0. 0 0 0 '0 . 0 0. 0 'C . 0 '0 J 0 . 0 C 0 0 0 '0 0 '0 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 C 0 C 0 '0. 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0. 0 ' 0. 0 ... 0 '0 0 '0. 0 C . 0 '0 . 0 ' 0. 0 C . u , 0 0. G '0 0 ' 0. 0 0. 0 'C . 0 0 0 '0. 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 'C . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . C 'C . 0 '0 0 '0 . 0 C . 0 '0 . 0 'o . 0 C . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 'C . 0 0 . 0 C . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 'e . 0 0 . 0 '0 c 0 '0 . 0 0 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 e . 0 0 . 0 0 . o '0 . 0 0 0 C . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 .1 0 .1 '0 . 1 0 . 0 . 0.. 0 0 . 0 o . a 0 . 0 0 . 0 . o '0 . ] 0 .: C . 1 0 .1 0 .1 c . l 0 n G . 0 C . o O . J 0 . 0 0 ... 0 . 0 0 . 0 c . c '6 o 'c . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 C . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 .0 . o 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 9 O . o '0 . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . C o 0 .1 '0 . 1 C . 1 '0 . 1 0 . '0 1 '0 .1 0 . 1 C . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 C 0 '0 . J '0 . 0 C . 1 '0 . L 0 . 1 C . 1 '0 .1 '0 .1 '0 1 '0 1 0 .1 0 1 '0 0 '0 . 0 J 0 '0 . c 0 . 0 i.. 0 0 . 0 0 0 C . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 v" . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 'o . 0 '0 . 0 'o . 0 - '0 . 6 '0 . 7 0 . 6 0. 3 0. 1 0. 2 '0 . 6 '1 . 0 '1. 4 1. 7 '1. 4 1 . 0 'C .] '0 . 7 0.] C. 7 0 "! 0.] 'c . 7 '0 s '1 .1 '1. 5 1 6 1. 5 '1. 2 '0 8 '0 . 5 '0 . 4 0 . 6 0. 9 '0 . 8 n 9 0. 8 C. ] 0 s 0. 2 C 1 0 z 0 4 0 4 0 4 0. 2 '0 . l C .1 0. 0 C. 0 t. t 0. 0 xc nn 3 '1 4 5 C 1 2 2 . 2 ' 1. 9 '1. 5 0 . 8 '0 . 2 '0 . 3 '0 . 6 ' 1. 0 '1 . 3 '1 . 3 '1. 3 '1. 3 1 . 1 1 1 . . 4 1. 2 1 3 1. 2 1 . 31. 2 0 . 5 0 6 1 1 2 '1 . 4 '1 . 8 L . ] 2 . 2 ' 6 '1 ' '1 . 2 '. '' ' '. 0 0 ' 1. 4 2 . 0�0 1 . 8 . ... . _ . . 8 '1 . 9 '1 . 1 '0 . 6 '0 . 3 '0 .1 '0 0 '0 . c 0 . 0 .J -I xP OT o S. 3 '0 9 '1 5 '1. . 3 '2.22 '1. 9 ' 1. 5 '0 . e C .1 '0 . 3 '0 . _ 0 9 '0 . 9 'C . 8 'C . 6 '0 . 6 '0 . 6 '0 . 6 '0 . 9 "1. 3 '1. 5 '1 . 4 '1 . 2 '0 . 8 0 . 6 '0 . 6 '0 . 5 '0 . 6 0 . 5 'C . 5 '0 . 4 '0 . 2 'C . 3 '0 . 4 '0 . 8 '1. 1 '1 . 3 '1 .1 1.1 1 . 5 '1 . 3 'C . 9 '1. 0 '1. 5xP'1 . 9 2 . 3 '1 . 4 'C . 5 '0 . 3 '0 . 1 0 . 0 '0 . c '0 . 0 - '0. 0 -0. 0 0. 0 0 . 0 '0 .1 ' 0. 1 '0 . 5 '1 . 0 '1 . a ' 1. 5 '1 .1 '0 .4 '0 . 3 '0.1 ' 0.1 '0. 0 '0. 0 '0 . 0 '0. 0 '0 . 0 . 0 0 . 0 ' 0. 0 C . 0 '0 . 0 '0 0 C . 0 '0 . 0 '0. 0 ' 0. 1 0. 1 '0. 4 1 . 1 kN-0 0 0 . ri ,.. 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 1 '0 . 1 '0 . 2 '0 . 3 '0 . 3 '0 . 3 '0 . 2 0 .1 '0 . 1 0 . 0 C . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 o . J '0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 1 0 . 4 '0 . 9 . _ '0 5 '0 . 5 '3 . 2 '1 . 5 0 5 1. 5 '1. 8 '2 .1 '1 . 7 '0 _ 8 '0 . 3 '0 . 2 '0 . 1 '0 . 0 0 . 0 0 0 ' 0. c 0. 0 '0 0 _ 1 0.. 0 3 0. c 1 . 2 '1 3 '1. 0 0. 6 ' 0. 2 'c 1 0. 0 ' 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 '0 0 ' 0. 0 ' 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 '0 . C 0. 0 '0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 .4 '1. 3 '0 . 5 0.. '0.1 0 . 1 "1 ." '2 . 1 1 . _ 1 . 5 '2 . 0 xP n.n 0.1 'o _ 0.2 'c.s 3.c 1.z '2.0 l. e i.6 '0.9 ' c. z "0 .1 "0 .0 '0 . 0 '0 .0 "0 .0 "0 .0 .0 .0 ' ..0 *0 .0 "0 .0 '0 .1 'o.: . 0.4 '0 .5 b.7 '0.7 '0.4 'o.> ID .1 '0 .1 .0 .0 *0 .0 0.0 .0 .0 "0 .0 ,,.1°,40 .1,roo.4 '0 .8 .1 .0 l.z '0.9 '0.7 0.4 'e.4 •c .s 'e.6 'e.s 1 0. 2 '0 5 '1 0 1 . 5 1 9 2 . 4 2 . 2 '1 . 8 1 - 6 ' 0. 2 '0. 1 '0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 0. 0 ' 0. 0 0 0 '0 . 0 '0. 0 0 . 0 0. 3 '0 . P 1 . 4 '1 . 8 '2 . 2 '2. 1 '1 . 6 '1 . 1 '0 . 5 '0. 1 '0 . 0 '0 0 0 . 0 '0. 0 0 C 0 . 0 '0. 2 c. 1 . 2 '1 . 6 ' 2.. .. e . 3 1 . 8 1. 7 '1 . 7 '1 . 7 2 . 0 2 . 3 ELECTRICAL NEW 26 UNIT SITE PLAN GRO UP Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture En gin ee ring Boarman Kroo s Vogel Gro up Inc. 222 North Second Street Minn eapolis, MN 55401 Telepho ne: 612.3 39.3752 F ac s i m i l e: 611339.6212 www.bkvgroup.c om E OE DOMINIUM ISS NCE evised Site Plan Submittal 07-15-2014 PROJECT TITLE Medina Townhomes KEY PLAN NORTH ARROW CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan. spedfication or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Lic ensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota . Mark H. Bradby 44226 License Number 0425/14 Date REVISION DATE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSI ON NO. SHEET TITLE 04-25.14 Ch ecker 1393.73 ELECTRICAL NEW 26 UNIT SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER E011 © 2013 BKV Group. Inc. EOE DOMINIUM PUD — General Plan Narrative Dear Dusty, This narrative for the PUD General Plan application serves as supporting documentation for the City of Medina's Planning Commission and City Council. Project Description The proposed project is located on a 3.90 acre site located at 510 Clydesdale Trail, directly north of the Medina Entertainment Center in Medina Minnesota: The plan includes 32 affordable town home units and a 1.400 square foot clubhouse. playground, parking for 19 guests, sidewalk connections and preserved green space. The unit mix and expected tenant population: 2 fully accessible 2 bedroom units - 3 two bedroom units 20 three bedroom units - 7 four bedroom units The expected resident population of 130 residents is calculated using the following guidelines: Two bedroom units are expected to have 3 residents. - Three bedroom units are expected to have 4 residents. Four bedroom units are expected to have 5 residents. DOMINIUM_: PUD — General Plan Narrative The project is designed to meet mandatory standards of the Green Communities Criteria, and the Energy Star Certified Homes, Version 3, County -Level Reference Design for Climate Zone 6. The development will be owned and operated as rental property by Dominium. Their intention is to provide all property management, maintaining the quality of the project buildings and grounds and the quality of the tenants. Application for Rezoning The project team is requesting a rezoning from its current Mixed Use Zoning (MU) to a Planned Unit Development District (PUD). Reasoning for Rezoning Request This project will be entirely residential in nature and does not qualify as a mixed use development. In order to comply with certain aspect of the Green Communities Requirements for site density we need to rezone the property to a PUD in lieu of an R4 to reduce the required spacing between building end walls and intemal site setbacks from the private street. By rezoning to a PUD we avoid a series of variances that would be required for an R4 use. The project responds to the following subdivisions of Section 827.25 of the City Zoning Ordinance: Subd. 1. Conservation and more efficient use of land Subd. 3. Preservation of existing natural planting area along the north edge of the site Subd. 5. The grouping of the units on the site allows for higher density, avoidance of existing wetland buffers, maintaining a landscape buffer between the development and Clydesdale Trail and connections to pedestrian sidewalks that connect the development to the community Subd. 7. With the higher density we are able to comply with the Green Communities Criteria for density, utilizing a more efficient layout of utilities and thereby lowering development costs of the project. The development as submitted will otherwise comply with the design requirements of Section 841.4 Design and Development Standards for Mid -Density, Multiple Family Residential Districts the Medina Zoning Ordinance. 2905 Northwest Blvd, Suite 150 • Plymouth. MN 55441-2644 • Corporate 763-354-5500 • Fax 7763154-5519 • Web domiuiumapartmeuts.com 49 DOMINIUM.. PUD — General Plan Narrative Legal Description Please see attached Exhibit A. Solid Waste Disposal Procedures Dominium Management Services, LLC ("DMS`') will implement a solid waste disposal management policy that is similar to the one held at Albertville Townhomes, in Albertville, MN; a similar development that DMS currently operates. This policy will comply with all City of Medina and Hennepin County rules and regulations. Currently. there are no issues with the solid waste disposal at Albertville Townhomes and we foresee no problems at the proposed Medina Townhomes development. Issues Addressed After Concept Plan Application Comment: Extend driveway lengths. Action: Given the dynamics of this site and the area we have to work with, extending all driveways past 22 feet is infeasible. However, the easternmost building next to the pump house can easily be moved back 2 feet to accommodate a longer driveway. We have extended the driveways for this building to 24 feet and we will direct residents with larger trucks/vans to these particular units. Comment: Guest parking. Action: Two additional stalls were added at the northeast corner of the private drive. This brings the total guest parking stalls to 19. The Senior Vice President of Property Management at Dominican Management Services, Jean Ferguson, believes 19 will be sufficient when taking into account her experience at Albertville Townhomes. Comment: Architectural features for trash and recycling containers. Action: DMS will instead implement a management policy that will require residents to store trash and recycling receptacles in their respective garages. This is a similar policy that has been implemented at Albertville Townhomes and has succeeded in minimizing this concern. We believe this will be a better way of managing this issue than implementing an architectural solution. Comment: Downspout locations, directly flows on to driveways. Action: This design is currently used at Albertville Townhomes and appears to have no issues with icing and storm water runoff control or quality. In addition, all storm water runoff from these downspouts will be treated through a rain garden filtration system and another treatment system located in the storm water reservoir, to be used for irrigation, before entering the City's stone sewer system. 2905 Northwest Ble=d. Suite 150 • Plymouth. MN 55441-_2644 • Corporate 763.354-5500 • Fax 763,354-5519 • Web domiuiamapartments.cont DOMINIUMw PUD — General Plan Narrative Comment: Garage doors in front facade are overwhelming Action: The garage doors have been altered to include small windows to break up the overall appearance of a front facade with too much of the same material. This should break up the garage doors and make the development more appealing. Please refer to Exhibit B for an example photograph. Comment: Strip of land to break up driveways between units. Action: DMS has determined that from a management perspective this is best left unchanged. A separation in the driveways is infeasible from a maintenance standpoint. It will make snow removal substantially more expensive. In addition, whether the break in the asphalt is sod or some other landscaping, it will be impossible to keep it alive in such a narrow space and will become unsightly over time. 2905 Northwest Blvd. Suite 150 • Plymouth. MN 55441-2644 • Corporate 763/354-5500 • Fax 763 354-5519 • Web dominiumapartiueuts.cour V' L a n d U s e O b j e c t i v e 1 - U p o n a d o p t i o n o f t h e 2 0 1 0 C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n , t h e C i t y w i l l r e v i e w e x i s t i n g z o n i n g d i s t r i c t s f o r c o m p a t i b i l i t y w i t h t h e C i t y '