Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout09-09-2014MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL (2052 County Road 24) 1. Ca11 to Order 2. Public Comments on items not on the agenda 3. Update from City Council proceedings 4. Planning Department Report 5. Approval of August 13, 2014 Draft Planning Commission minutes 6. Dominium — 510 Clydesdale Tr. — Mixed Use Stage I Plan for development of 26 affordable rental townhomes. 7. Charles Cudd De Novo — Preliminary Plat and Rezoning for 15 lot single family residential development to be located east of Co. Rd. 116 and south of Hackamore Rd. 8. Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Potential amendment to the Staging/Growth Plan regarding the pace of development in the City. 9. Farhad Hakim — 22 Hamel Road — Site Plan Review to construct an Apartment Building and an Accessory Parking Garage. 10. Council Meeting Schedule 11. Adjourn POSTED IN CITY HALL September 5. 2014 Date: `' j' j /(7\u) L G , T Y Comment MEDINA Name of Speaker: L M1 5 Card '1'1 \ eV Public Forum Agenda Item 6, 4 Address: `� S b `'' c l lease print) I '°A0 J1 Telephone (optional): Representing: `3 e 1; Agenda Item (list number and letter): Comments: Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: G, T Y o F Comment Card MEDINA Name of Speaker: t\b \` �.,,Qutiy? 4' Public Forum m Agenda Item 4 1 aseyrint) n Address: LI cl9 () i' ec \ L.0"S jU Telephone (optional): 1 V�-- 8 L,v j Representing:crr4" Agenda Item (list number and letter): ..-r,, )Z rll f'tl,: ,_:v Comments: f k \\ Gr` ,i i Y "= ``,`-'mss Qt Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: G , T Y o Comment Card MEDINA Public Forum Agenda Item /" Name of Speaker: 2 (? ��U C ---.. V --5e Address: I/0; ( leas print) I vv./ Lc< Telephone (optional): Representing: -e (c Agenda Item umber Comments: ' ` c and letter): (0 V 4 L (4, $ .rte % c-i}e A) 7- S frl---_,--e____ ft c.- s /4"565 6147Coi4^1.4 _ ___)",-4 Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: (7 9- 2 0/ q c., x T Y 0k Comment Card Public Forum Agenda Item MEDINA Name of Speaker: 'F(, Ail k M'; aJ r) of -e - (please print) AddreSS: 3-34, R co Fos .-Di; v -e- Telephone (optional): Representing: "1—k e F� r.4 2 e 0 G 01,0, M e L Agenda Item (list number and letter): DO (1 ' N I LI Comments: W 11 Al— ir:R eca M a m e Ica. 7 A 4/e C; -r; 274 6-' 0 4 M t .0 Ix 4 ) 67 ./ vrio 'T6 ` LAI. G,z O''v NQa' Approach the podium to eak a ifl 55f3 ";r,,) Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: c, T Y o Comment Card Public Forum Agenda Item MEDINA M. Name of Speaker: 16 trn be j r 1 1 i,�Y\ m- vi V) (please pr i t) 1 Address: -4"\() C '1/1-C Vlr C.1 �t1-1 1 —r t'/, i) i Telephone (optional): Representing: Agenda Item (list number and letter): DOM 1(/"j I IA Vt-) , }k VV (/ Comments: Ct V C; (YIA Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: G , T Y o Comment Card Public Forum Agenda Item MEDINA Name of Speaker: 5TH7/_ /'ve"es�-,e.e. L / (please print) Address: .()0 Sh>>9ui,ve-,c G%oas '� Telephone (optional): Representing: 5 '' Agenda Item (list number and letter): 7 - Zihwzts e� 4 b6- /tin/c) Comments: Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: lyq t T Y t Comment Card MEDINA Name of Speaker: FE umo b+ VIvAoLa Public Forum Agenda Item iii 8 (please print) Address: LI S" 4 l3k,vt, UL1 ya.A4c. S Telephone (optional): —163 2 03 1;6 9 Representing: Se tc Agenda Item (list number and letter): A 4j Comments: Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: c, ` 7 Y Comment Card MEDINA Name of Speaker: NA 0,1(1,--- Zb-t-- Public Forum Agenda Item (please print) Address: (, (-[% 51, L ,)v i,„,, t ex.x)C' Telephone (optional): Representing: Agenda Item (list number and letter): g Comments: Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: G , T Y Comment Card MEDINA Name of Speaker: _' ." i G j,, -`h --G-ve,f,- cW 4 Public Forum Agenda Item (please print) Address: (0 00 �� C4 L,,iry P tkj 00-A3 fel Telephone (optional): Representing: Si-,_ \_( Agenda Item (list number and letter): C, Comments: Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: G% T Y O F Comment Card MEDINA 5 Public Forum Agenda Item Name of Speaker: lease ) Address: fri. VU 5° -7 7 Telephone (optional): v 1 d�----��" l !,3 7? Representing: Agenda Item (list number and letter):-==3PG/A'25 gi Comments: Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes Date: .1 11 it iv T Y o Comment Card MEDINA Name of Speaker: ' ---TATI't 12-9S Public Forum Agenda Item 1 (please print) Address: Lti� RA S G—� EACH _rK \�;•1 1 Telephone (optional): Representing: - S1 2 '�i' NAV � ' 1 7th tt'AVI M Agenda Item (list number and Comments: l Art-f/t letter): ) t ?VI) G (y1 U\'' Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Weir and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: August 29, 2014 SUBJ: Planning Department Updates September 2, 2014 City Council Meeting Land Use Application Review A) St. Peter and Paul Cemetery CUP — St. Peter and Paul church intends to expand their cemetery at the southeast corner of County Road 19 and Hamel Road. Improvements include new access drives, landscaping, stormwater.improvements and additional grave sites. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at the July 9, 2013 meeting and recommended approval. The City Council reviewed on August 19 and directed staff to prepare a resolution of approval, which will be presented on September 2. B) Go2Print Media Site Plan Review — Go2Print Media has requested Site Plan Review approval to construct an accessory storage building at 62 Hamel Road. The Planning Commission reviewed at the August 13 meeting and recommended approval. The request is scheduled for review at the September 2 City Council meeting. C) Capital Knoll Subdivision — south of Hamel Road, north of Blackfoot Trail, east of Arrowhead Drive — Princeton Capital — the applicant has requested a subdivision of the existing 30 acres into three rural lots — the property fronts on both Hamel Road and Blackfoot Trail. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at the August 13 meeting and recommended approval. The request is scheduled for review at the September 2 City Council meeting. D) Wakefield Subdivision — 3385 County Road 24 — The Wakefield Family Partnership has requested approval of a rural subdivision of 74 acres at the southeast corner of Homestead Trail and County Road 24. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at the August 13 meeting and recommended approval. The request is scheduled for review at the September 2 City Council meeting. E) Hamel Place apartment Site Plan Review — 22 Hamel Road — Farhad Hakim has requested approval of a site plan review to construct a 8 -unit apartment building at 22 Hamel Road. The applicant has also requested that the City consider vacating a portion of an existing utility easement to allow the structure in this location. The Planning Commission reviewed at the August 13 meeting and requested a number of changes to the plan. The applicant has provided an extension and is considering ways to address Planning Commission comments. The application is scheduled to be reviewed again at that September 9 Planning Commission meeting. F) Dominium Affordable Rental Townhomes — 510 Clydesdale — Dominium has applied for a Stage I Plan to develop 26 affordable rental townhomes on 3.85 acres. The townhomes would include rent and income limitations because the developer has received pledges for funding through Minnesota Housing. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and the matter will be scheduled for a Public Hearing when complete, potentially at the September 9 Planning Commission meeting. G) Villas at Medina Country Club PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat — East of CR1 16, south of Shawnee Woods Road — Rachel Contracting has requested approval of a subdivision to include 28 "villa" style single family homes and 20 larger single family lots. The matter was scheduled for a public hearing at the August 13 Planning Commission meeting, but the applicant requested the hearing be postponed to address staff concerns. Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 September 2, 2014 City Council Meeting H) Woodland Hill Preserve subdivision — east of CR 116, north of Medina Lake Drive — Charles Cudd De Novo has requested preliminary/final plat and rezoning approval for the development of 15 lots on the 16 acres (7.99 net acres) immediately north of the Toll Brothers Reserve of Medina project. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and the matter will be scheduled for a Public Hearing when complete, potentially at the September 9 Planning Commission meeting. I) Property Resources Development Co. (PRDC) Comp Plan Amendment/PUD Concept Plan — West of Willow Drive, southwest of Deerhill Road — PRDC has requested a Comp Plan Amendment to reguide 90 acres from Rural Residential to Low Density Residential (2-3.49 units/acre) and also a PUD Concept Plan for a 99 lot subdivision. The PUD Concept Plan is incomplete at this time and will be scheduled for review when complete information is submitted. The Comp Plan Amendment Public Hearing was delayed indefinitely at the request of the applicant. J) Verizon Telecommunication Tower CUP — 3574 Pinto Drive — Verizon has requested a CUP to replace an existing telecommunication tower located on top of the City water tower with a stand- alone 159 foot tall monopole tower in the same location. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the June 10 meeting and recommended approval. The City Council adopted a resolution of approval on August 19. The application will now be closed. K) Woods of Medina Preliminary Plat — Jeff Pederson has requested preliminary plat and rezoning to subdivide 9.5 acres (8.8 net acres) at the intersection of CR116 and Shawnee Woods Road into 16 R1 single family lots. The request includes a vacation of a portion of Shawnee Woods Trail and a partial waiver from tree preservation requirements. The City Council adopted documents approving the requests at the January 7 meeting. Staff will await a final plat application. L) Enclave at Brockton 41h Addn — Lennar has requested approval of the next phase of the Enclave at Brockton, to include 18 single family homes. The City Council approved at the April 15 meeting, and staff will work with the applicant on the conditions of approval. M) Hamel Haven Final Plat — 805 Hamel Road — JJC Hamel LLC has requested final plat approval for a proposed lot split. The Council granted preliminary approval back in 2011. The Council adopted a resolution granting final plat approval on May 6. Staff will work with the application to complete the conditions of approval. N) Three Rivers Park/Reimer Lot Rearrangement — the property owners have requested a lot rearrangement to allow a "land swap" of property which the Reimers own on the west side of Homestead Trail and which Three Rivers owns on the east side of Homestead Trail. The City Council reviewed at the August 7, 2013 meeting and adopted a resolution of approval at the August 20, 2013 meeting. Staff will work with the owners to finalize the conditions of approval. 0) Morrison Lot Split and Variance — Truxtun and Adrienne Morrison have requested to subdivide their 18 acres at 1525 Hunter Drive into two lots. The City Council approved of the division at the June 4 meeting. Staff will work with the applicant to finalize the terms and conditions of the approval. P) D.R. Horton Stage 1 Plan — D.R. Horton has requested Stage I Plan approval for development of Mixed Use property west of Arrowhead, east of Mohawk and north of Highway 55. The entire property is approximately 84 acres in area (approximately 59 acres upland) and the applicant proposes 85 single family lots, a 54 unit apartment building and 5 acres of commercial development. The City Council granted Stage I approval at the January 21 meeting. Other Projects A) Comp Plan Revision Discussion — staff held Open Houses on August 21 and August 26 to received feedback on the Staging and Growth Plan and the pace of development. The meetings were relatively well attended. B) Cable Build -out — staff is reviewing information provided by Mediacom related to the plans to install cable in the community. Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 September 2, 2014 City Council Meeting 1 CITY OF MEDINA 2 PLANNING COMMISSION • 3 DRAFT Meeting Minutes 4 Wednesday, August 13, 2014 5 6 1. Call to Order: Commissioner Nolan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 7 8 Present: Planning Commissioners Charles Nolan, Robin Reid, Randy Foote, Kent Williams, 9 Robert Mitchell, Victoria Reid, and Janet White. 10 11 Absent: None 12 13 Also Present: Council Member Kathleen Martin, City Planner Dusty Finke, and Planning 14 Consultant Nate Sparks. 15 16 2. Public Comments on items not on the agenda 17 No public comments. 18 19 3. Update from City Council proceedings 20 Martin updated the Commission on recent activities and decisions by the City Council. 21 22 4. Planning Department Report 23 Finke provided an update of upcoming Planning projects for July. 24 25 5. Approval of the June 10, 2014 Draft Planning Commission meeting minutes. 26 R. Reid asked for a correction to page six, line 262, of the June 10th minutes. She had 27 expressed agreement and support for V. Reid's comments and wanted it on the record. 28 29 Motion by , seconded by , to approve the June 10, 2014, Planning Commission minutes with 30 correction. Motion carries unanimously. 31 32 6. Rachel Contracting PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat to develop 48 single 33 family residential lots along the north and west portions of Medina Golf and Country 34 Club. 35 36 7. Public Hearing - Wakefield Family Trust — 3385 Co. Rd. 24 — Preliminary Plat to 37 subdivide one parcel into 3 Rural Residential lots. 38 Sparks presented the staff report. He noted that the minimum lot size in the RR 39 district is 5 acres of contiguous suitable soils. He stated that the applicant is 40 contesting the Hennepin County soils map, and provided surveyed topography and 41 soil boring information. 42 43 Mitchell inquired about the septic sites on Lot 1. Sparks showed the location of the 44 existing septic system. 45 46 Mitchell inquired if the driveway for Lot 3 could be moved as far west as Hennepin 47 County is requesting. Sparks noted that the lot is wide enough to accommodate that 48 request. 1 49 V. Reid inquired if the shared driveway was a City requirement or the applicant's 50 wish. Sparks responded that the applicant showed it in this way because of County 51 comments. 52 53 Public Hearing opened at 7:25 p.m. 54 55 Finke noted that a property owner to the east who shares the driveway in Outlot A 56 called the City and stated they were not concerned with the subdivision, but agreed 57 that the driveway for Lot 3 should be pushed as far west as possible. 58 59 R. Reid stated that she had an interest in protecting the views on Homestead Trail. 60 The large wetland will accommodate this protection so that she has no concerns. 61 62 Mitchell inquired where the building locations would be. Spark showed on the plan 63 where they would be located. 64 65 Public Hearing closed at 7:27 p.m. 66 67 Motion by V. Reid, seconded by Williams, to recommend approval of the 68 Preliminary Plat request to subdivide one parcel into three rural residential lots with 69 conditions noted in staff report. Motion carries unanimously. 70 71 8. Public Hearing - Princeton Capital —1575 Hamel Road — Preliminary Plat to subdivide 72 one lot into three Rural Residential lots. 73 74 Sparks presented the staff report. He noted that two lots were proposed to share an 75 access off Hamel Road and the third lot accessed off of Blackfoot Trail. 76 77 Mitchell asked staff to confirm that the math was correct for the additional right -of - 78 way. Sparks said it will be clarified going forward. Y P 79 80 Foote inquired if Blackfoot Trail would need to be updated since it is substandard. 81 Sparks noted that the existing property could already have one home off of Blackfoot, 82 so staff is not recommending improvements since no more lots are proposed on this 83 side of the property. 84 85 Public Hearing opened at 7:37 p.m. 86 87 John Riley of 1405 Blackfoot Trail stated that all the neighbors that live on the road at 88 this time enjoy the gravel road, as they feel it keeps traffic down. They believe the 89 road should be left as it is. 90 91 Finke said the City has an adopted policy for roadway updates — 50/50 split with tax 92 levy dollars if initiated by City. He also went into some of the history concerning 93 Blackfoot Trail. Finke also mentioned that there is nothing in the 5 -year CIP for 94 upgrades to Blackfoot Trail. 95 2 96 Paul Ohnsorg of 1475 Blackfoot Trail asked about the trail along Blackfoot, and 97 where it would go. 98 99 Finke mentioned there would be a north connection to the County trail in the future, 100 but for now there is not an immediate plan. 101 102 Ohnsorg also asked where the driveway on Lot 3 would be located. 103 104 Sparks stated that their plans were not known and they don't have a set location on 105 the plan at this time. They would have to meet the City's driveway location criteria. 106 107 Finke stated that one matter staff had discussed was that these are rural lots and there 108 may be an expectation for animals and animal structures on the property. He said 109 there is a 150' setback animal structure requirement and this plan only has a very 110 narrow strip that would be eligible for animal structures. There was a consensus that 111 the applicant should be put on notice concerning the existence of this requirement. 112 Finke said staff will work on adding recommendations and language concerning the 113 animal structure requirements. 114 115 Motion by R. Reid, seconded by White, to recommend to the City Council approval 116 of the Preliminary Plat request to subdivide one parcel into three rural residential lots 117 with conditions recommended by staff and adding an additional condition related to 118 setbacks for animal structures. Motion carries unanimously. 119 120 Mitchell asked to add a friendly amendment to the motion for number 9 clarifying the right - 121 of -way numbers. Motion to accept the amendment by R. Reid, seconded by Williams. 122 Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: none) 123 124 9. Go2 Print — 62 Hamel Road — Site Plan Review to construct a 1500 square foot free - 125 standing Accessory Building. 126 Finke showed the proposed site plan — accessory use to office use. Property is zoned Uptown 127 Hamel II. Location of storage building is partially a result of the easement, which is why 128 they are requesting a stand-alone building as opposed to adding on to the principal structure. 129 He stated where the building would be set and the flexibility that is there — zero lot line 130 setbacks on sides and rear to accommodate utilities. Set 2' from western line and 2' from 131 northern line as shown in plans. Eugene Street, western lot line, is privately maintained and 132 is being used mainly for parking for the area. City installed stormwater improvements. He 133 went on to state what building materials were allowed to keep to the historical nature of the 134 area. 135 Ordinance requires generous window coverage and, as proposed, the building would not meet 136 the 30% facade standard on the street level, which he felt the Commission should discuss. 137 Eugene Drive may at some time in the future be developed into a public street and is used at 138 this time as a road to get into some of the sites. Parking sites would be taken up by the new 139 building proposal, but there could be flexibility since there are opportunities for on -street 140 parking and public parking in the future off Mill Drive. He also discussed the trees that 141 would need to be removed (six large) and that according to standard ordinance 30" of 142 replacement trees would be required and the applicant is asking for a waiver to that code item 143 as the trees are not particularly high quality. Planning Commission will be asked to make a 3 144 determination on the requirement and if in favor of the tree waiver, would have to adjust the 145 recommendation to the Council. 146 147 V. Reid asked about Eugene Drive and what it may become in the future. Finke said he 148 doesn't see that changing, but could possibly terminate at a parking lot to the west. There was 149 also a clarification to the fire department using the west side of Eugene Drive for parking of 150 vehicles. V. Reid also asked if there was a possibility of each building having two different 151 uses in the future. Finke said it would have to meet code and they could not have two 152 principal uses on the lot, the storage building is accessory. Nolan and V. Reid raised concern 153 about the storage building not having very many windows or enough parking. V. Reid said 154 the goal in that area is to have an urban environment. Finke stated that the City has flexibility 155 towards parking in that area. Nolan summarized the discussion by stating that the 156 Commission is reviewing what the applicant is requesting today, but if for some reason in the 157 future a more intensive use were to be requested, then it would have to be relooked at for 158 approval and would have to comply with City code requirements such as parking. 159 160 Nolan asked for elevations of the building. Finke provided exterior elevations and the 161 Commission discussed. Mitchell asked if the storage building met the window requirements. 162 Finke said it didn't if it's determined to be the street level/fronting a street. Nolan said the 163 area is to be considered a pedestrian friendly area, yet the structure is accessory. Williams 164 said he visited the site and he thinks it would be a vast improvement to construct a building 165 there as opposed to the way it looks now. 166 167 Williams asked about paving and also for clarification of where they are proposing it. Finke 168 said the paved area would be right in front of the storage building. Williams said he was 169 concerned with paving, since it would increase the impervious surface. Finke clarified by 170 stating that it wouldn't be increasing since everything would be within existing gravel. 171 172 Foote raised concern with vehicles being parked within the private easement at the rear of the 173 lot that is to be utilized for emergency access only. Finke explained that if the whole site 174 were being developed new, it would be laid out differently. 175 176 Tom Therrien, applicant and owner of Go2 Print, stated he could answer any questions from 177 the Commission. Nolan asked how long he's been in the space and Therrien said he 178 purchased it in 2010. Therrien said he's a sales print company. He said some of the finished 179 goods he does store, even though they send out for printing. He said he rents the property 180 next door for storing. He said he'd like to own his own storage area rather than rent. He 181 stated that he prefers to have his own storage on site and said how much easier it will be for 182 their business. William asked how many parking stalls behind his building get taken up at a 183 time each day. Therrien said there are four in the back and two parking spaces on the side. A 184 total of six people are in the office at any given time and there isn't the need for parking for 185 retail customers, since most of his clients are on the east coast. He said the building doesn't 186 show windows in the door, but he could put window panels in it. 187 188 Nolan asked if the design was more of a barn -like structure with the high windows. Therrien 189 said yes. Therrien said he would do whatever the Commission wants for the landscaping and 190 discussed some of the ideas he had for landscaping. He said he would like to stay clear from 191 planting trees since within 10 years they typically need to be removed. V. Reid asked about 192 the cottonwood tree being removed and what would remain. Therrien said there would be an 193 ample amount of trees remaining. The windows were also discussed and he said that he 194 could lower them if that is what the Commission wants, but would be concerned with how it 4 195 would look if he were to have scaffolding or shelving in front of the windows. The 196 Commission consensus was that it was OK to have the high windows, but that maybe a 197 different style door would add to the appeal of the building without adding a lot of expense 198 since it is facing the street. The Commission generally liked the idea of a barn style or 199 carriage style door that had the appearance of being wood, but was still metal and insulated. 200 There was also a consensus noted by the majority of the Commissioners concerning the tree 201 waiver. 202 203 Nolan said the addition to the storage building does trigger additional parking. 204 205 Motion by Mitchell, seconded by R. Reid, to recommend to the City Council approval of 206 the construction of a 1500 square foot Accessory building, with the following conditions #1-3 207 remain as recommended by staff, strike #4, #5 commission recommends a tree waiver, # 6 is 208 acceptable, #7 additional parking not required at this time for the storage building, but if a 209 change in use occurs in the future, the parking would have to be addressed at that time, #8 & 210 #9 remains as written, and #10 to be added to require a new garage door style with wood 211 cladding or equivalent. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: none) 212 213 10. Farhad Hakim — 22 Hamel Road — Site Plan Review to construct an Apartment 214 Building and Accessory Parking Garages. 215 Sparks presented the application and reviewed the overall project. He said density and 216 hardcover for the lot met requirements. He also explained that an easement vacation was also 217 necessary as part of the project and that they were asking for an eight foot easement rather 218 than ten feet. The side yard setback would then be eight feet. The drive aisle is proposed to 219 be two feet from the side property line in portions of the side yard, not all. The minimum 220 setback to the side yard is 2.5 feet and so a waiver would be necessary for the reduced .5 of a 221 foot. 222 223 Sparks explained the parking for the building was not underground, but rather enclosed 224 parking via a detached parking garage. Sparks said the ordinance requires the garage have 225 exterior materials that match the principal structure. He said they are proposing the accent 226 material of the principal structure as the primary exterior material for the parking garage. 227 Sparks wanted to make sure the Commission was satisfied with the proposed exterior 228 material and recommended it be a condition of approval. 229 230 Sparks explained the site has a lot of trees. He said the applicant is proposing to remove all 231 of the trees except for one ten inch elm tree. After calculating the significant trees to be 232 removed and adjusting the formula from what's explained in the staff report after consulting 233 with City Planner Finke, the applicant would be allowed to remove two trees at no penalty 234 and so the final tree removal would be 98 trees. Sparks said the applicant doesn't have a tree 235 replacement plan and staff recommended a tree replacement plan be provided either for on - 236 site or off -site. He said the applicant was not requesting a tree waiver. 237 238 Sparks explained the drive aisle width meets the 24 foot in width requirement. He said in 239 order to maintain the drive aisle width it impacts the setback of the parking garage and two 240 foot bump outs were necessary for sufficient maneuvering out of the garage on the end 241 spaces. Staff feels the applicant has made sure the drive aisle width is wide enough for safe 242 maneuvering. 243 244 Sparks said the apartment units have laundry rooms in each unit and have three bedrooms. 245 The applicant is proposing more parking than what is required by code. 5 246 247 Sparks said the applicant has shown landscaping in some areas, but additional areas are 248 shown bare and a revised landscape plan should be submitted to address that all bare areas on 249 the lot be landscaped. 250 251 V. Reid asked if the City had any special design standards for Uptown Hamel. Sparks said 252 there are special architectural standards in the code. He said an example of that would be that 253 the ordinance requires porches off the front of the building and the applicant is proposing to 254 bring the building and porches up closer to the front sidewalk to meet the code requirement. 255 He said specificity of a Vintage style look isn't expressly written in the Code. Finke asked V. 256 Reid if her question was more related to scale rather than design. V. Reid said the proportion 257 and the look of the building don't have an old town feel like the other condo building in 258 Hamel. She would like to see some modifications to the exterior appearance. 259 260 Finke said even though the applicant did not request a tree waiver, he is sure one will be 261 requested before this goes up for approval to the Council so he requested the Commission 262 address the issue. White asked if staff knew the quality of the trees on site. Sparks said the 263 site does have four black walnuts and two maples on -site. Williams asked if there are any 264 other residences abutting the rail line and if it's even appropriate to have residences along 265 there. Finke said the City has planned for residential in this area and if it makes a difference 266 to them the railroad crossing nearest this project doesn't have the train whistle at the crossing. 267 268 The closeness of the railroad was discussed and if it makes sense to put a structure that close 269 to the railroad. The fact that it is a rental property was pointed out and that people will 270 realize before they make a commitment that there is a railroad close by. Foote said the trains 271 go through that location around 50 mph and many trains go through the area daily. R. Reid 272 said she considers a residential apartment building different than someone purchasing a home 273 near a railroad track. She said presumably people would see that the apartment building was 274 located near railroad tracks. V. Reid ask for clarification of Mixed Use zoning and that she 275 thought the property had to have two uses on the site and it also said it's shown for high 276 density residential. Sparks said the Comprehensive Plan guides it Mixed Use and it is zoned 277 Uptown Hamel, so not zoned Mixed Use. Williams asked if this application met the required 278 density and Sparks said yes. R. Reid said that this is the type of residential they were looking 279 for in this area. She did want to express her concern with how the building looks and to add a 280 condition relating to design of the building. 281 282 Nolan asked if the applicant was present and Finke said the applicant wasn't at the meeting. 283 284 R. Reid asked if there is any way to require a different type of design, and if so, how specific 285 would they have to be to do that. Finke said the applicant was open to changing up the 286 design as long as it's not cost prohibited. Nolan said he is concerned that they didn't have 287 reasonable tools to work with. He said he is used to reading plans all the time and the ones 288 submitted were drawings and not very useful and he felt the City should require some sort of 289 rendering with color. He also commented that the look of the elevations is very different than 290 what is in the packet. 291 292 The Commission suggested specific design guidelines be established in the future for Uptown 293 Hamel since the City is starting to see some activity in the area. 294 295 Mitchell doesn't like the fact that there are so many incomplete items, concern with the 296 architectural exterior appearance and that the applicant isn't present at the meeting. He 6 297 suggested the item be tabled and asked if there was enough time to do so. Sparks said the 298 review deadline is September 30th and there were not enough Council meetings to get it 299 through the process. 300 301 R. Reid raised concern that the exterior building as proposed looked like it was out of the 302 50's -60's era and isn't anything close to what they are looking for in Uptown Hamel. She 303 said it has the potential to be a really ugly building. V. Reid said she thinks it's great to have 304 residential in that area. R. Reid agreed. 305 306 Nolan raised concern with the concrete patio that has a sliding glass door which is below the 307 balconies. He said it has potential for a sitting area with a grill that could eventually be a 308 rusting weber kettle and broken plastic chairs and would be close to the sidewalk. He 309 suggested some sort of screening to contaift the patios similar to that of the upper balconies. 310 311 Nolan said he wanted to see more articulate modulation/detailing to the building. 312 313 Finke said the Commission could recommend additional conditions to work forward prior to 314 going to the Commission. Nolan said he'd like to see more landscaping in front of the 315 building and into the parking lot to break up some of the pavement. R. Reid suggested more 316 creative landscaping. Nolan said he's asking for some more specific items. 317 318 Tom Therrien of Go2 Print said the rendering doesn't do a lot for it, but he asked the 319 Commission to give modern materials a chance, because sometimes the blending of old and 320 new can be good. 321 322 Nolan said the overall issue for him is not being able to really understand what they are 323 looking at on the plans. He also feels he doesn't have enough tools to review the application. 324 If he were to make a recommendation it would be to deny the application based on not having 325 enough information. Williams said the conditions are so open ended that he's not sure how 326 they are ever going to know if the conditions have been met. Nolan asked for guidance from 327 staff. 328 329 Nolan said he would recommend denial based on the landscaping being insufficient and that 330 the renderings are not clear as to what they are proposing. Mitchell said they only make a 331 recommendation and the Council acts on it. Finke suggested a conditional tabling, subject to 332 receiving an extension letter. The recommendation would be to table it and go back to the 333 Commission for another review so that when it does go back to the Council it is substantially 334 complete. 335 336 Finke clarified the additional concerns of the Commission which were landscaping and 337 architectural modulation. Nolan said conditions 3-5 were still incomplete, and suggested 338 adding another condition that the architectural appearance of the building needs to be more 339 consistent with the Uptown area. 340 341 Motion by Mitchell, seconded by Williams, to recommend tabling of the application to 342 resolve all pending issues based on the applicant providing an extension by August 21, 2014. 343 Additionally the applicant shall be present at the next meeting. If an extension is not 344 provided by the applicant, then the application is denied. Motion carried unanimously. 345 (Absent: none) 346 347 7 348 11. Council Meeting Schedule 349 Mitchell agreed to attend and present at the August 19, 2014 Council meeting. 350 351 12. Adjourn 352 Motion by Williams, seconded by R. Reid, to adjourn at 9:26 p.m. Motion carried 353 unanimously. 8 AGENDA ITEM: 6 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231 .2555 Facsimile: 763.231 .2561 planners@nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Medina Planning Commission FROM: Nate Sparks DATE: September 4, 2014 RE: Dominium Stage I Plan Review CITY FILE: LR-14-141 Application Date: July 16, 2014 Review Deadline: November 13, 2014 (extended) BACKGROUND / PROJECT DESCRIPTION Dominium has made an application for a Mixed Use Stage I Plan Review for a proposed townhome development located at 510 Clydesdale Drive. The project is proposed for construction of 26 rental townhomes on a private internal drive with associated accessory improvements (club house, playground, parking) on approximately 4 acres of land north of the Medina Entertainment Center. The Stage I Plan Review is intended to review the land uses, general site layout, densities, and other initial components and to provide direction to the applicant in order to ensure the project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance prior to any preliminary plat and Stage II Review. Previously, the applicant had sought approval for a Planned Unit Development at the same site. This application was for a 32 unit townhome project with a similar layout. The applicant withdrew that request and instead is seeking consideration for this proposal. SUBJECT SITE The subject site is vacant and vegetation is predominantly grass. The site is utilized on rare occasions as overflow parking by the Medina Entertainment Center. Most of the site is flat, although it falls steeply closer to the north and east property lines. A portion of a larger wetland extends onto the northeast corner of the site. Surrounding uses include commercial to the south and west, private recreation (golf course) to the north, and single family homes (planned for commercial redevelopment) to the southwest. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONING The Comprehensive Plan has this site guided for a Mixed Use -Business designation. The Comprehensive Plan states that: "Mixed -Use Business (MU -B) provides opportunities for multiple, compatible uses on one site including two or more of the following: residential, general business, commercial, or office. Residential densities in this designation will be between 7.0 units per acre and 45.0 units per acre across the entire area and may include some vertically integrated uses. The mixed -use business areas will be served by urban services." The property is zoned Mixed Use (MU). The Zoning Ordinance states that the intent of the Mixed Use District is to integrate a mix of uses to promote housing and commercial diversity and that the district may be used to transition from intense highway oriented uses to lower density residential uses. The Planning Commission and City Council have previously decided that allowing multiple uses (residential, commercial) within a MU -B site is permissive in the Comp Plan, not a requirement. This has been implemented previously in the Uptown Hamel zoning districts which permits a site to develop with solely residential uses, and through rezoning other MU -B properties to solely residential districts. Staff has anticipated that some property within MU -B will develop with only commercial uses and some property will develop with higher density so that all MU -B property, taken together, falls within the range. The City has zoned the subject property as Mixed Use, which allows a net density from 3.5-7 units per acre, and therefore accounted for a lower amount of residential development on this site. The zoning of this property was discussed specifically when the City rezoned property to be consistent with the updated Comprehensive Plan. It was determined at that time that zoning this property Mixed Use would be consistent with the MU -B guiding, when put in the context of the zoning requirements of the remaining MU -B property in the City. MIXED USE STAGE I REVIEW Each Mixed Use development is required to be reviewed in three stages. The Stage I Plan is intended to establish the general layout of land uses and densities. The overall plan layout is to be reviewed for overall compliance with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. A successful Stage I Plan is then recorded against the property and establishes the general parameters for the overall site. It does not guarantee any development rights, as many issues may evolve or be discovered in the more thorough nature of reviews in the later stages. After Stage I, the Stage II Plan is reviewed in conjunction with the Preliminary Plat and other commonly associated zoning approvals. This would include fully engineered plans. The Stage III Plan follows thereafter with the final plat. To review any mixed use plan, the City must consider generally if the plan meets the following objectives: 1) This District shall consist of creative and thoughtful residential and commercial development that preserves open space and natural features. 2) Residential density shall average between 3.5 units per acre and 6.99 units per acre over a minimum of half of the developable area. 3) Residential development shall complement existing development in surrounding residential neighborhoods. 4) Developments shall incorporate creative design and buffering techniques to ensure smooth transitions between different types of development or different intensities of uses. 5) Where appropriate, developments shall be easily accessible to pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users. 6) Development shall include high quality and attractive building materials and architectural design as well as extensive landscaping in order to limit impacts on surrounding land uses, and shall be integrated and coordinated in a way to most efficiently utilize site improvements and to protect the natural environment. 7) Development in the MU District shall demonstrate consistency with the goals, policies, and other elements of the Comprehensive Plan. 8) Development shall be designed to be served with public utilities, streets and other infrastructure without separate City investments, including the necessary extension of such infrastructure to connect with surrounding existing and/or future development. In addition, development in the Mixed Use zoning district requires the following general standards: (1) Minimum Residential Density: 3.5 dwelling units per net acre. (2) Minimum Land Area to be devoted to residential uses shall be 50 percent of net developable land. (3) Maximum Density: 6.99 dwelling units per acre (see density incentives). (4) Required residential density shall be calculated using the total number of units and the total land area devoted to residential uses in the Stage I Plan. (5) Where feasible, residential areas shall consist of more than one dwelling unit style, e.g. single family detached dwellings, two-family dwellings, attached townhouses, or multiple family dwellings. (6) Areas abutting and within 300 linear feet of Trunk Highway 55, County Road 19 or Willow Drive shall be utilized for commercial land uses. (7) Areas within 100 feet of property designated in the Comprehensive Plan for rural residential or low density residential development, shall be comprised of only single family detached or two family attached dwellings. (8) If the two standards in (6) and (7) above conflict, standard (6) shall have precedence. Proposed Uses/Project Density The applicant proposes to develop the entire subject site with townhomes, along with accessory uses to townhome development. As noted above, a minimum of 50% of the net developable land is required to be residential. No minimum commercial component is established, except for areas abutting and within 300 linear feet of certain roadways. The subject property is not abutting or within 300 feet of these roadways. The Mixed Use zoning ordinance requires that "where feasible" residential areas shall consist of more than one dwelling unit style. Staff notes that this is by far the smallest Mixed Use zoned property in the City. This would make implementing a "horizontal" mix of uses fairly difficult. The Planning Commission and City Council can discuss if a greater mix of uses is feasible on the site. The Mixed Use Zoning District allows for a density of 3.5 units per acre up to 6.99. Also stated is a minimum area per unit of 8,750 square feet and a maximum of 12,500. For this second standard there are options for density bonuses as outlined in Section 842.2.05 Subd. 4. The overall site is 167,726 square feet. The wetland area is 4,015 square feet in area and the wetland buffer is 7,645 square feet. Therefore, the net area of the lot is 156,066 square feet or 3.58 net acres. The applicant qualifies for three density bonuses for affordable housing, sound suppression, and common open space. The applicant has received pledges for financial support through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency and other agencies to develop townhome units with limits on the rent which can be charged and limits on the income level of the occupants. This qualifies the project for the density bonus related to affordable housing which allows for 1.5 unit per acre. The applicant is also proposing a sound suppression system that is exceeding the minimum STC rating in the building code by 10. This qualifies for a density bonus of 0.5 units per acre. The project has common open space which qualifies for a density bonus of 0.25 units per acre. With the proposed density bonuses, the site is allowed to have 25 units. The project, as proposed, has 26 units. Prior to consideration of the Stage II Plan, one unit would need to be removed. Proposed Site Layout The applicant proposes 26 townhome units in eight buildings. A horseshoe private drive provides access to the units and is proposed to have two access points to Clydesdale Trail. The townhomes all include attached two -car garages and sufficient depth for parking two cars in each driveway. The applicant also proposes a clubhouse for common use and a playground for recreational use. Thirteen guest parking spaces are proposed in addition to the garage and driveway parking. The following table depicts the setbacks proposed by the applicant: MU Standard Proposed Setback from Clydesdale Trail (buildings and parking) 50 feet 50 feet Setback from private street 25 feet 25 feet Setback between buildings 30 feet 30 feet Side and Rear Yard 20 feet 20 — 40 feet Max. Hardcover 50% 44.50% . The grades behind most of the units fall fairly steeply and there is limited usable space beyond the patios/decks. However, a common recreational area is provided in the south center of the site. As noted above, the purpose of a Stage I Plan review is to establish uses, densities, and general site layout. More specific development issues are reviewed as part of the Stage II review. However, the applicant has provided more in-depth plans. As such, staff has provided general review comments on a number of subjects which will be more fully reviewed at the time of Stage II review. Wetlands A wetland on the property to the east extends into the northeast corner of the site. The wetland is classified as Manage 1 according to the City's Functional Assessment of Wetlands. An upland buffer with an average width of 30 feet is required, and structures are required to be set back an additional 15 feet from this buffer. Streets/Parking The applicant proposes a 24 foot wide private drive to provide access to the individual driveways for the townhome units. No parking will be allowed along the access drive in order to allow adequate emergency vehicle circulation. The City Engineer has not identified the need for improvements to Clydesdale Trail to support the proposed development. The applicant is proposing to provide 13 guest parking stalls which is '/2 stall for every unit. These spaces are important because no street parking is available. Staff recommends that the owner regulate these spaces to be for guest use only. The driveways are generally proposed with 40 foot widths, as for many units there is a shared drive for neighboring units. This is wider than the standards allowed for drives that access public streets but is acceptable due to the fact that it is a private drive. If possible, the applicant may wish to consider a grass strip separating the drives. Stormwater/LID Review The applicant proposes to meet the City's water quality requirements through a series of rain gardens along the south of the property. Stormwater will be treated before being discharged to the pond on the adjacent site, which was designed to accommodate this site for rate control purposes. The City Engineer has provided some direction for some technical changes, which are attached. Buffer Yards and Landscaping For the Mixed Use District standards, landscaping is required for one conifer or deciduous tree per 60 feet of lot perimeter, one ornamental tree per 120 feet, and one understory bush per every 40 feet. The Ordinance also requires buffer yards of a 0.2 opacity to the north property line. The applicant has designed a landscaping plan to meet these minimum requirements. There is no significant tree removal proposed for the site. Lighting The applicant proposes 12 street lights along the private shared drive and at the playground. Building mounted lights are proposed on the clubhouse. The applicant proposes LED fixtures which are fully downcast as required by code. Existing streets lights are already located along the back of the trail on the north side of Clydesdale Trail. Light measurement readings are limited by code to 0.6 FC at the property line. The applicant's photometric plans show that the existing fixtures along Clydesdale Trail which light the trail will exceed this amount, but the applicant's proposed new fixtures generally meet the standard. Sewer/Water All sewer and water improvements within the site are proposed to be privately maintained. The City Engineer has provided comments, which are attached. Pedestrian Circulation/Recreation The applicant proposes playground equipment in the southern portion of the site. The applicant has also proposed a sidewalk through the common space which connects with the trail on Clydesdale Trail. Building Type & Design Unit Types The Mixed Use District requires, when feasible, more than one dwelling unit style for each new development. The proposed development contemplates two styles as there are townhomes and two -unit buildings proposed. There are five four unit townhome buildings proposed and three two unit buildings. Two of the two unit buildings are of a similar aesthetic style to that of the townhome buildings. Of the four -unit buildings, three have end units with four bedrooms and interior units with three bedrooms. The other two four -unit buildings have three bedroom units only. One two -unit building has three bedroom units while the other two have only two bedrooms. One two -unit building has two accessible units. As mentioned earlier, one unit will need to be removed to meet the maximum density standards. This may result in a Phase II Plan with a different building type. Materials City ordinances require a minimum of 20% of townhome facades facing public or private streets be an accent material. Because this is a PUD, the City could require some additional elements. Existing plans show this standard being met with brick and shakes along the front elevation of the 4 -unit buildings along with the windows. Modulation/Articulation City regulations require the building design of townhomes buildings to be modulated a minimum of once per 50 feet. The rear elevations shown on the plans are broken up through the use of materials and dormers with a bump -out by the patio or deck. The second floor of the front facade bumps in and out based on the number of bedrooms in each unit. The applicant has proposed garage doors with windows, as well. Generally, the buildings appear to meet the intent of the Mixed Use Ordinance. Commissioners should provide comment on the building design. Building Height City regulations limit building height of townhomes to 32 feet if not sprinkled. The height of the proposed structures varies from 23-28 feet in height. Garages City regulations require townhomes to have garage space of two cars per units (minimum of 440 sq. ft.) The plan meets this standard. Additionally, additional architectural elements ("may include varying setback of garage doors, differentiating roof designs, constructing dormers, and installing garage doors with windows or other design elements") are required if garage doors occupy more than 50% of the frontage of a building. The applicant has proposed garage doors with windows in order to improve the facade to meet this standard. The front elevation also includes differences in roof design over some of the garages. Trash and Recycling Code requires that trash and recycling bins for individual dwelling units are stored so not to be prominently visible form streets or neighboring units. The applicant has increased the sizes of the garage to exceed the minimum standards in order to allow for room to store trash containers inside the building. Plat The subject site is currently platted as an outlot. With the Stage II Plan this will need to be platted into a buildable lot. RECOMMENDATION City Officials are to provide comment on the proposed Stage I Plan which is intended to provide land uses, general site layout, phasing, and other general elements. If the Planning Commission finds that the plan is generally consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and the intent of the Mixed Use District, it would be appropriate to recommend approve the request with the following conditions and comments (at minimum): 1. The plan shall be consistent with the requirements of the Mixed Use zoning district. Subject to density bonuses described in the Mixed Use zoning district, the maximum number of units shall be 25. 2. All comments from the City Engineer should be addressed. 3. All comments from the Watershed District should be addressed. 4. Stage I Plan approval does not confer any development rights. Development shall be subject to Stage II Plan approval in addition to other relevant approval processes, including subdivision. Such development shall also be subject to all relevant ordinance requirements in place at the time of this subsequent approval. 5. The Owner shall record against the Property an agreement, in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney, which describes the general layout, land uses, and densities required by the future development of the Property in order to ensure compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and other relevant regulations. 6. Any future development shall obtain Stage II and Stage III approval prior to any construction and these plans shall be consistent with the general layout, land uses, and densities depicted on the approved Stage I plan. If the Planning Commission finds that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Mixed Use District, it would be appropriate to recommend denial of the application to the City Council. Exhibits: 1. City Engineer's Report(s) 2. Applicant's Narrative 3. Applicant's Plan Set 4. Letters of Support submitted by Applicant WSB &.,,,„� engineering• planning• environmental- construction August 4, 2014 Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: City Project: Dominium Stage 1 Plan, LR-14-141 WSB Project No. 2712-09 Dear Dusty: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the Stage 1 Plan submittal dated July 14, 2014, for the Medina Townhomes site. The plans propose to construct street and utility improvements to serve a 26 unit townhome development at 510 Clydesdale Trail. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters. Sheet C2.0 Site Plan 1. The proposed retaining wall along the east Side of Road C and north of Clydesdale Trail should be located outside of the perimeter drainage and utility easement. Sheet C3.0 Grading Plan 1. The grading plan should be revised so that public works can access the existing sanitary manhole in the northeast corner of the site can be accessed from Clydesdale Trail. An access at least 10 -feet wide with grades less than 10% should be provided over the existing sanitary sewer easement between Clydesdale Trail and the above -mentioned sanitary manhole. 2. The plans should include emergency vehicle turnarounds to the satisfaction of the fire marshal, specifically within the site at the west end of Road B. 3. A landing area with grades between 1% and 2% at least 50 -feet long should be provided on Road A at the intersection with Clydesdale Trail. 4. The existing catch basin shown in the proposed curb cut at the intersection of Road C and Clydesdale Trail should be relocated outside of the curb cut or the location of the intersection should be revised so the catch basin is not in the curb cut. 5. Earth work calculations should be provided for review. St. Cloud • Minneapolis • St. Paul Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:101711-0901AdminlDocsiDomininm Sage I Review-080414.doe Dominium Stage 1 Plan August 4, 2014 Page 2 Sheet C4.0 Utility Plan 1. The sanitary sewer design connection in Clydesdale Trail should be eliminated. The plans should be revised to reverse the flow on Road C and direct those flows to the north to SAN MH-2. SAN MH-2 should be moved north and a pipe should be constructed from SAN MH-2 easterly to the existing sanitary sewer along the east boundary of this parcel. A new manhole should be constructed over the existing sanitary sewer and the pipe between SAN MH-2 and the new manhole should be at a grade not to exceed 4%. This will most likely require designing SAN MH-2 to be a drop structure. 2. Future submittals should include a stormwater management plan. 3. The plans should include proposed low floor elevations and sanitary sewer service invert elevations. 4. The proposed trench drain along the west side of Road C north of Clydesdale Trail should be shown and labeled. 5. The watermain line type along Road C should be revised to match the other watermain line types. Please contact me at 612-209-5113 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. /OW Tom Kellogg K:',.0'712-090i4dminiDocsInominium .Singe 1 Review-0804/4.doc Larkin Hoffman. ma ATTORNEYS July 16, 2014 Dusty Finke City Planner City of Medina 2052 County road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431-1194 GENERA.: 952-835-3800 FAX 952-896-3333 WEB: www.larkinhoffman.com Re: Dominium Stage I for 26 Rental Townhomes on 3.9 Acres of Land Located at 510 Clydesdale Drive (the "Project"); Our File #35,539-01 Dear Mr. Finke: We represent Dominium (the "Applicant") in its application for approval of a Stage I Plan under the City's development regulations for the Mixed -Use (MU) District. See Section 842.2 of the Medina City Code (MU District Regulations). The purpose of this letter is to set forth the compliance of the revised development plans for the Project with applicable City zoning regulations. To prepare this zoning analysis, we reviewed the prior record of consideration of the PUD General Plan for a similar project of 32 affordable rental twnhomes, as well as the revised plans submitted with this application. In summary, the enclosed plans have reduced the number of proposed dwelling units from 32 to 26. In addition, the revised plans comply fully with development standards for setback and lot layout as set forth in the City's Land Development Code for the MU District. Since the resulting density on the property is less than seven (7) units per acre, and the building setbacks have been revised, the applicant is no longer seeking flexibility under the City's Planned Unit Development (PUD) regulations. Discussion Land Use and Zoning Compliance As noted in the staff report, dated June 3, 2014, the subject property is guided for Mixed Use - Business (MU -B). Higher density residential development is permitted under the MU -B guiding for the subject property. In previous applications, the Planning Commission and City Council have determined that residential is a permitted use under the Comprehensive Plan whether or not the use is developed with a mix of uses. This is particularly true where the subject property is surrounded by a mix of uses, including commercial, entertainment, industrial and recreational uses. Under the MU District, residential development is listed as a permitted use, allowed as a matter of right. These permitted residential uses include "Townhouse Dwellings, provided no structure Dusty Finke July 16, 2014 Page 2 contains more than six dwelling units". See Section 842.01 of the Medina City Code. With the revised plans, the density of development does not exceed seven (7) units per acre and complies with both the Comprehensive Plan and MU District Regulations. See Section 842.2.05 of the Medina City Code. Proposed Site Layout Dominium proposes 26 townhomes in eight (8) buildings. The townhomes include attached two - car garages and sufficient driveway depth to satisfy parking requirements. The Applicant also proposes a clubhouse for common use and a playground for recreational use. COMPLIANCE WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS Zoning Code Requirement City Code Standard Proposed Standard Setback from Public Street (buildings and parking) 40 feet 40 feet (building) 25 feet (parking) Setback from private street 25 feet 25 feet Setback between buildings 30 feet 30 feet Side and Rear Yard 20 feet 20 feet (west) 40 feet ( north) Side and Rear yard — if adjacent property is less intensive zoning 40 feet N/A Maximum hardcover 50% 46% Wetland building setback 15 feet 15 feet Buffer Yard and Landscaping 30 overstory trees 15 ornamental trees 44 shrubs 35 overstory trees 15 ornamental trees 112 shrubs Maximum Building Height 32 feet 23-28 feet Garages Minimum two cars/unit Minimum two cars/unit Dusty Finke July 16, 2014 Page 3 Conclusion The Applicant has reduced the density of the Project and has modified the Site Plan to fully comply with City Code. In addition, certain amenities have been enhanced, including the stormwater facilities; driveways have been lengthened for safety and certain recreational facilities have been enhanced. These improvements will be more fully described by our client in the public hearing scheduled for review of this application. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me with questions regarding this submittal. Please incorporate this letter in the official record of decision in this matter. Thank you. Sincerely, William C. Griffith, for Larkin Hoffman Daly kfndgren Ltd. Direct Dial: 952-896-3290 Direct Fax: 952-842-1729 Email: wgriffith@larkinhoffman.com cc: Jeffrey R. Huggett, Dominium Nick Andersen, Dominium Ron Batty, City Attorney 4811-0320-0028, v. 2 bank. COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE 800 Nicollet Mall, 5th Floor BC-MN-H5AD Minneapolis, MN 55402 June 3, 2014 Mr. Paul Sween Dominium Development and Acquisition 2905 Northwest Blvd. - Suite 150 Minneapolis, MN 55441 Dear Paul: All of us serving you I am writing this letter as a reference to the good work that Dominium has done over the years for U.S. Bank (USB). USB has an extensive relationship with Dominium on both the debt and equity side of the business. Our relationship encompasses dozens of transactions in multiple states across the United States. The Dominium Principals are straight forward and have always demonstrated the highest integrity in all of their dealings with USB. In fact, our comfort level with your firm is so high that we've hired you to be our work out agent on several projects that were experiencing problems. In one particular example, the previous developer had taken on a complicated project that was beyond their capabilities and made promises to the city they could not keep. Dominium stepped into the situation, corrected multiple construction deficiencies, leased up the project and developed a very productive working relationship with the City. USB does business with affordable housing developers all over the US and we count Dominium among our very best clients. If there is any additional information I can provide, please let me know. Sincerely, t i Kyle Hansen Executive Vice President usbank.com June 2, 2014 Mayor Elizabeth Weir City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Re: The City of Saint Anthony's Experience with Dominium Mayor Weir: I understand that Dominium is proposing the development of a 32 unit townhome in the City of Medina and that this development will offer family housing to the residents of Medina of varying income levels. I am writing you today to inform you of the City of Saint Anthony's experience with both the Dominium Development as well as (and possibly more importantly) the ongoing Management team. The Landing at Silver Lake: In the fall of 2004 Dominium completed the construction of the Landings at Silver Lake Village, a 263 unit development. The Landings at Silver Lake Village was financed with the combination of tax- exempt bonds and low income housing tax credits. The development provides a wonderful housing option within the City of Saint Anthony at a variety of rent levels in conjunction with income levels. The quality of construction development at The Landings at Silver Lake is excellent. The Management team operates the property in the most professional manner. The Landings is a development that we at the City of Saint Anthony are proud of. The Legends at Silver Lake: In January of 2014 Dominium began construction on another development in the City of St. Anthony — The Legends of Silver Lake. The Legends when completed will be a 170 unit apartment development, which also was financed with the use of tax-exempt bonds and low income housing tax credits. This development is a senior development and is 100% affordable. The City of Saint Anthony had a 10 year history with a very successful mixed income development when we approved The Legends. Our positive experience with Dominium made it fairly easy for City Staff and Council to support a second development. I am confident that The City of Medina will have a positive experience with this team. Sincerely, f ' Mayor Jerry Faust City of Saint Anthony Phone: (612) 782-3301 E-mail: ifaust(a,ci.saint-anthony.mn.us 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699 • www.ci.saint-anthony.mn.us • (612) 782-3301 • (612) 782-3302 Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village, which is sustainable, safe and secure. CITY OF SAINT PAUL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CHRISTOPHER B. COLEMAN Mayor August 6, 2014 Mayor Elizabeth Weir City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Re: Dominium Development Dear Mayor Weir, Creating thriving, vibrant communities for current and future residents requires that cities and developers come together to provide a mix of affordable and market -rate housing options. Partnerships between reputable developers and cities build great communities and strengthen us all as a region. Dominium Development has completed new construction, rehabilitation, and adaptive reuse housing projects in Saint Paul including 808 Berry Place, Carleton Place Lofts, Maryland Park Apartments, and the Schmidt Artist Lofts. The company is also working on final plans for a new construction senior housing development on Saint Paul's East Side. All of these projects have helped to address the city's community needs and accomplish redevelopment goals. Last week, the grand opening event was held for the Schmidt Artist Lofts. This project included a massive renovation of the brewhouse and bottlehouse buildings on the historic Schmidt Brewery site. Dominium preserved and transformed the buildings into live -work affordable housing for artists along with community spaces to showcase their talents. The complex now has 247 apartments and 13 new construction rental townhomes. This development was primarily financed with a combination of tax-exempt bonds, federal and state historic tax credits, and low income housing tax credits. Aside from the investment and renewal for the neighborhood, what's most impressive is that these units are 100% occupied and have brought new residents to our city. As you consider Dominium for a 26 unit family townhome development in Medina, feel free to contact me with any questions about their work. We have found their work and management of their proper�es to bi -quality. Si Mayor Chris Coleman City of Saint Paul CITY HALL SUITE 390 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102-1615 651/266-8510 AA-ADA-EEO Employer N5ithfidd Housing and Redevelopment Authority August 5, 2014 Mayor Elizabeth Weir City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Re: The City of Northfield's Experience with Dominium Dear Mayor Weir: I understand that Dominium is proposing the development of a 26 unit townhome project in the City of Medina and that this development will offer family housing to the residents of Medina of varying income levels. I am writing you today to inform you of the City of Northfield's experience with both the Dominium Development and ongoing Management team. The City of Northfield and the Northfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority worked closely with Dominium Development in 2009 and 2010 on an affordable housing project near the core of our community. Jefferson Square Townhomes is a 50 unit townhome development, offering two, three and four bedroom units to low and moderate income households. Originally built in the early 1980's, the complex was close to sunset of the existing tax credits and if not renewed, the units would be market rate and sold to the highest bidder. Dominium Development stepped in and not only purchased the property, but also applied for and received tax credits to preserve the affordable rents of these units for another 20 years. They also completely gutted and remodeled every unit, built a community building for the residents of the complex to use, and re -landscaped the entire five acre parcel. Thanks to the work of Dominium Development, a blighted property was rejuvenated and is able to provide affordable housing for Northfield's workforce for another 20 years. Their continued on -site management of the property has resulted in a clean, safe property that provides housing for the families working in Northfield's treasured downtown and our renowned industries. Additionally, Dominium was a pleasure to work with on this project. I am confident that The City of Medina will have a positive experience with this team. Sincerely, Michele'Me ycuke Michele Merxbauer, MSW Community Development Coordinator City Hall ♦ 801 Washington Street ♦ Northfield, Minnesota 55057 507.645.3047 ♦ fax 507.645.3055 ♦ e-mail: Michele.Merxbauer@ci.northfield.mn.us CITY a,i "a;: OF IINO4L KES August 4, 2014 Mayor Elizabeth Weir City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Re: The City of Lino Lakes Experience with Dominium Mayor Weir: 1 understand that Dominium is proposing the development of a 26 unit townhome project in the City of Medina and that this development will offer family housing to the residents of Medina of varying income levels. I am writing you today to inform you of the City of Lino Lake's experience with Dominium. The City of Lino Lakes has worked with Dominium on Lakewood Apartments. Lakewood was a new construction, affordable housing project built in 2007. The project was built by another developer, and after being built, the property faced a number of challenges, including frequent police calls. Dominium became involved at the end of 2008, and since their involvement, we've seen vast improvements. . Lakewood Apartments was primarily financed with low-income housing tax credit equity and HOME funds from Anoka County. The development provides a wonderful housing option within the City of Lino Lakes at affordable rent levels. Overall, Dominium has done a great job with this project. I am confident that The City of Medina will have a positive experience with Dominium. Sincerely, 514 Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes CC: Nick Andersen, Dominium 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651-982-2400 • Fax: 651-982-2499 httpc//www. ci.euclicl. oh. us June 3, 2014 To All Interested Parties: 585 East 222nd Street, Euclid, OH 44123.2099 Bill Cervenik, Mayor Phone: 216/289-2700 Fax: 216/289-2766 Please allow this communication to serve as a strong letter of support for Dominium Management Services. The Company's management of the Euclid Apartments in the City of Euclid, Ohio has been nothing short of phenomenal. Prior to Dominium's involvement, this property was underutilized, in poor physical condition and was a source of frequent criminal and nuisance activity. I had grave concerns about the future of the complex and the detrimental effect it would have on the city if it continued to decline. Today, as a result of Dominium's management, residents are now afforded a quality and well maintained household in which to live and raise their families. The environment at Euclid Apartments has become one that has created pride in the hearts of its residents as they live in a safe, secure and inviting property where various activities and services are provided that enhance the quality of life. Dominium is also very active in the City of Euclid, sponsoring and participating in various business and community events. I can say that you would be wise to welcome the addition of Dominium Management Services to invest in and manage properties in your Community. They have proven to the City of Euclid that they are capable and responsive property managers with the resources and resolve to do the job right. Please feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Yours truly, L,,.„,z Mayor Bill Cervenik e a ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN a s. i COINER 91RAC.G (4-n I IO 10 I I 10 BUIL ING 2 Gross: 8 628 sq. ft. Foo tprint: ,845 sq. ft. .447[1 • Aa Cd4041E OARING 10 AAA[ 11011 91001) MX •P0AR UTCAL CROW AM R LARYr aS f7 B1 B1 M B1 B1 r C BUILD IN G 1 C ross: 8,191 sq. ft. Footprint: 4,844 sq. ft. er T R ExNeiSido JO 41 WTH *AIFRPROOF SEAA4T, C REBAR DOLL Pat W1CRE1E R AY ED¢ [2) R4 ROW - Cd)1NI0J5 CAOR 10p6R.IKB7 /7�\ colinciED BADE W 1E0A J �----- re -4 PLRFOIAIID GRAN 111 RN FRIER COL RAQ- a RA CRAW L A DEN AND ARO UND DURING MSTAUATION > GL01EK9 E FLIER FA9 a0 IY MPH (Wt)j6AWKD 5UD 8" x 18" CONCRETE PLAY EDGER SCALE: 1' . 1'-p A010 CONCRETE PLAY EDGER mu: I., -r 30' MINNUY ® ® T r BUILDING 3 Gross: 7,628 sq. ft. Fo otprint 4,345 sq. ft. B B B 1111111111111 BUILDING 9 Gro ss: 8,191 sq. ft. Foo tprint: 4,844 sq. ft. PRO PERTY LINE 0[ VISuAL HEAPING AVANED 6)441 B 30' MINIMUM BUILDING 8 G ro ss. 3,461 sq. ft. Footprint: 2,240 sq. ft. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlI1I11T1[111111 BUILDING 4 Gross: 8,191 sq. ft. Foo tprint: 4,844 sq. ft. BUILDING 7 G ross: 1, 253 sq. ft. Footprint: 1_253 sq. _ EA SEMENT CLYDESDALE TRAIL BUILDING 5 G ross: 3.836 sq. ft. Footrrint: 2,325 sq. ft. •� WETLAND • •�, � EA SEMENT ...... - - - - - - J7-] 26'-11 1/Y I ® 1 • • • • • 41 ••• ACCESSIBLE UNIT D D BUILDING 6 — Gr oss:3,315 sq. ft . Foo print: 3,315 sq. ft EASE MENT ACCESSIBLE UNIT --- _1 41 3 4 I II'II : I I 1 I I I I I I I I L..J A B C. SEE CNA AND LANDSCAPE DRAWI NGS FOR ADOMONAL SITE K00 6861 4. SEE MECHAMCN. AND ELECTRICAL DRA WI NGS FOR ADp1401uL UTILITIES INFORMATION. EXISTING 5 NN4GE. PARKING L GHTNG, PUBL IC ACCOMAOOAT464S. UIUTL5. ETC. GALL BE KEIN OPERATIO NAL OR REPLACED WITH NEW THROUGIWT THE DURATION OF T HE PR OJECT. ASSOCIATED WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH T HE OWNER AND UTILITY 008CNL5. 0. CO NTRACTORS SHALL REPA4R ALL UNAUTHORIZED PROPERTY DAMAGE THEY CAUSE AT N0 COST TO T HE OWNER . E. PROTECT A0 KEEP CLEAR ALL ROADS, CUNBS. AND GUTTERS OARING CON5TR0CI10N UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. PROVIDE DIVERSIONARY DRAINAGE AS REQUIRED WHERE WOW INTERRUPTS THE DOSING STREET DRAI NAGE PATTERNS . A NY DAMAGE 10 E 051NG ROA DS AND GUTTERS SHALL RE REPARE0 AT THE C ONTRACTOR'S 00PEN5E . F. LOCATE UTU11E5 PRIOR TO EXCAVATION AND M ANTAN MARANGS Of EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAI N MANG CONSTRUCTION . PR OTECT AID CONSTRUCT A ROUND E051NG UTILITIES TO REMAIN A5 NECESSARY . COOR DINATE ACCESS TO LOCAL MIMES WITH OWNER MECHA NICAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, A640 ENGINEERS AS RED4 A ED. CONTRACTORS ARE ADVISE0 OF THE PRESENCE OF UNDER GROUND *1471 [5 N T HE AREAS OF FOUNDATION EXCAVATION . G. CONCRETE EIXKPMENT PADS SMALL BE SIZED ACCOR DING 10 ED UIPMENI R 006406ENT5 UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHER WISE. LINT ALL SITE DISTURBANCE TO THE ARE AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS, SEE CIVIL. SEE OWL FOR 400ITKRAL 64ORI ATIO6 DIMENSIO NING OF DRIVES, WALKS , AND PA RKING AREAS. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LO CATIONS OF SITE LIG HTING SEE STRU CTURAL AND LANDSC APE DRAWINGS FOR RETAINING WALLS AND FOUNDATION. SEE L ANDSCAPE PLANS FOR EXISTING 800019TIN (TREES. 408.485, GRASS. ETC) TO TO REM AIN 0/4 THE SITE. PROTECT AS 60050(ED H. J. K. L. FLOOR PLAN -KEYNOTES O1 CORCRETE DRIVEWAY- SEE COL OASPHALT DU NE- SEE CML ASPHALT AT UNIT DNVE WAT- SEE CARL OCONCRETE 0468 ®CONCRETE SURMOUNTABLE CURB ®CONCRETE WALK ORETAINNG WALL- SEE DAL DRAWINGS ®CE AC5 SIBLE PLAYGROUND BY OT HER PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE ACCESS TO PLAY GROAN. VERWY SLOPE OF W A8 5 NEVER 14AN SS R NOM FRAMED DECK Al BACK OF MOUSING LINO. SEE DETAIL 2/A633 10 CONCRETE PATIO AT M O( 0 4IO U540 UNIT . MONUMENT SIGN . SEE DETAIL 3/A633 11 DEMO EXISTING CAR CUT . PROVIDE NEW CURB AND NE W TRAIL TO MATCH EXISTING SEE CML 0000640 WETLANDS TO BE PROTECTED DURING Vy I3 AND AFTER CO NSIRU CTON- REFER TO CAL AND LANDS CAPE PUNS 14 RAIN G ARDEN- SEE CML ACCESSIBLE CONCRETE WALK TO ACCESSIBE 15 UMIS PRO VIDE 3'-0' MITT WA IL WITH ACCE551B40 TURNING. 16 WA0BOKE5 LATCHED PATTERN DESIG NATES FACES 17 RECEIVING BRICK VENEER SEE ELEVATIONS BKV GRO UP Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boa rman KFOOB Yerl Group Inc 222 N orth Second Street Minneapolis MN 55401 Telephone 61 2-339-3752 Fa csimile 612-339-6212 www .bkvgroup.com REVISED SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET 08-29-2014 PROIE GrTITLE Medina Townhomes K EY PL AN CEFOFIUTION Cair0CATION I IrR4/' a .1yB Werile pn .pAdlal a mat w ppred p RN r alir WR' Rene apMNPN M tK I aN a (k4 Win ed RIh•ImM Ardis addles km DIVA Soo orNew Yak 14709 Wino liner REVISIO NS Na DATE REVISE D APPIC NAL 01-21-14 DATE DRAWN BY CF EO® BY COMM ON NO. 0R -2P-14 N 139373 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PL AN A0I0 0 2014 BKV Gaup. Ina EDE PROTECT TREE O REMAIN I L.__ • / ./ REMOVE EXIST. TRA IL AND CURB AND GUTTER REMOVE &SALVAGE EXIST. LIGHT POLE 8 FIXTURE TRANSPLANT EXIST. TREE WITH TREE SPA DE Yr— PROTECT TREE 0 PE MAM TRANSPLANT EXIST. TREE WITH TREE SPADE PROTECT TREE IN FINAL LOCATION GOPHER STATE ONE CALL W W W. GOPHERSTA TEONECALL ORG (.0) 252-1100 TO LL FREE (051) 0560 002 LOC AL 116 r o _j 10I REMOVE & SALVAGE EXIST. LIGHT POLE 8 FIXTURE - REMOVE EXIST . TRAIL AND CURB AND GUTTER SURVEY INFORMATION' . EXISTING CONDRIONS LEGEND' 54tHEV BY N ESTA000 PROFESSIONAL SER.12ES LEGAL DESCRIPTION'. OLIGLOTS DCCNAGG uDA EMARNETPi ACE HENN EPN rvNESOTn 1 EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTIN G MANHOLE p EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTI NG HYD RANT • EXISTING STOPBOX CO EXISTING GATE VALVE ■ EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX • EXISTING LIGHT p EXISTI NG GAS METER • EXISTI NG GAS VALVE SOIL BORING LOCATION CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING SIGN EXISTING S ANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTI NG WATE R MAIN EXISTI NG GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDE RGROUND ELE CTRI C EXISTI NG UNDE RG ROUND CABLE EX.2CONT OUR ELEVATION INTE RVAL 104 OvESfiThe <CB CCD 6 .11 St. LOUIS PAH , AIN Y94, 26,212.22 214 BKV GR OUP 41P DOMIN[UM MEDINA T OWNHOMES CLYDESDALE TRAIL, MEDINA, MN DOMINIUM 2905 NORTHWEST BLVD, PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 LICENSED PROFESSI ONAL EN GINEER ORDER THE LAAS ZTTA E ST ATE OE Mallnex R Pa vel, RAY 721.1 LICE NSE ISSUE/SUB MITTAL SU MMARY art2.24 WETLAND AND S GE L AY OUT REV 22,4 2,1 REVISED SITE PLAN A PPR OVAL REVISI ON S UMMA RY DESCRIRGON EXISTING CONDITIONS AND RE MOVALS C1.0 PLO TTED: 7/15/2014 3:1642 PM 1101116. 11 / 5 FENCE; BLACK VINYL -COATED CHAIN 1 E%TEND FENCE TO PROPERTY LINE AT WEST END EX yEGETAnON EDGE LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN SOD 0 2(r 11111111111 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: ' Nimbi!! OVERSTORY/EVERGREEN TREES REOURED ORN AMENTAL TREES REOUIRED LOW EVERGREEN RE QUIRED EQUIRED 40' I I ea MESIC 00AIRIE SEED Mlx; 50%. NATIVE GRASSES/50S NATN E WILDFLOW ERS BASED ON RE0141RE0 LENGTH OF BUFFER YARD PERIMETER (SEE TABLE BELOW) = 30 = 5 = 15 = 0 = 44 = 12 PROPOSED PLANTINGS _ GS 35 PROPOSED 15 PROPOSED 3 PROPOSED 56 PROPOSED BUFFER FARO REQUIREMENTS LOCATION SCORE POINT REQUIREMENT NORTH BvrFLR YARD EA ST BU FFER YARD .2 135 1 62 SOUTH BU FFER 0400 .1 62 WEST BUFFER YARD .1 62 BUFFER YARD PROPOSED DESIGN: LOCATION PUNTING DESCRIPTION. POINTS EACH POINTS AS PROPOSED NORTH BUFFER YARD 2 OVERSTORY TREES (2.5" CAL. ) 3 EVERGREEN TREE5 (3' TALL) 50, 50 12, 12. 12 136 EAST BUFFER YARD 1 OVERSTORY TREE (2.5' CAL.) 4 M EDIU M DECIDUOUS SH RUBS (24" TALL) 50 3 3 3 3 62 SOUTH BUFFER YARD 1 OVERSTORY TREE (2. 5" CAL. ) 4 MEDIU M DECIDUOUS SH RUBS (24" *ALL) 50 3. 3, 3, 3 62 WEST BUFFER YARD 1 010055OR TREE (2 5" CAL ) 4 MEDIU M DECIDUO US SHRUBS (24" TALL) 3 , 3, 3, 3 62 ALL PLANTINGS WILL BE IRRIGATED WITH A COMBINATION OF ROTARY SPRAY HEADS IN TURF LAWN AREAS AND DRIP HEADS IN PLANTING BEDS AND TREE RINGS. ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM LAWN AREAS 4:1H STEEL EDGING BARRIER. A LL PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. KEY N OTES Ex yEGETADay EDGE v CLYDESD ' LE TRAIL TRAIL CL YDESDALE O SOD • MESIC PRAIRIE SEED MIX OTREE PLANTING: 2.5" CALIPER DECIDU OUS CANOPY TREE OR 6' TALL EVERGREEN TREE aO TREE PLANTING: 3' TALL EVERGREEN TREE O TREE PLANTING; 1. 5" CALIPER DECIDUOUS ORNAMENTAL TREE 0 SHRUB PLANTING. O FBEONCE: ' TL W ITH CHAIN U NK H BLA CK VINYL CO ATING. TOP AND TTOM 6AI eO STEEL EDGING: SEPARATES TURF FROM MAINTENANCE EDGE AND PUNTING BEDS. O IRRIGATION LOCATIONS (APPROXIMATE LSLEFV LOCATION --CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST LOCATIONS FOR ALL SLEEVING TO MAXIMIZE EFFICIENCY. ) O MAINTENANCE STRIP AT BUILDING 66:66:08 WALL; 4' DEEP WASHED FIVER ROCK, SIZE I5"-1.5', WITH LANDSCAPE FABRIC BENEATH: WIDTH OF MAINTENANCE 505:6 VARIES. e PLAYGROUND: EQUIPMENT BY OWNER 12 CONCRETE W ALK e MONUMEN T SIGN: SEE ARCHITECTURAL 0 EX I50NG TREE TO REMAIN ® CATCH BASIN, APPRO0 MATE LOCATION; CONNECT TO DOWNSPOUT AND UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE PIPE. ® DRAINAGE PIPE: 4' PVC PIPE CONNECTING DOWNSPOUTS TO UNDERGROUND CISTERN FOR HARVESTING ROOF RUNOFF O UNDERGROUND CISTERN TO HARVEST RAIN WATER FOR USE IN IRRIGATION SYSTEM. p✓ T.4 Y � :F tt nynq z BBC 2 - Tn 10 GENERAL NOTES Ex vEGETAD ON EDGE 6' FENCE BLACK VINYL -COATED CHAIN LINK S BU64TEND EAST ENO OF FENCE TO ALIGN WITH I •\ LAND5CAPE CONTRACTOR S HALL INSPECT THE S 0E A ND BR, . FAMILI AR WIT H EXISTI NG CONDITIONS RELA,NO TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WOR. LANDSCAPE CONTR ACTOR SH ALL VERIFY PLAN LAYOUT AND DI MENSI ONS SH OWN AND BRING TO THE A TTENTION OF 1TFIE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DISCREP ANCIES WHIC H MAY CO MPR OMISE TITE DESI GN AND/ OR INTE NT OF THE PR OJECTS LA YO UT LANDSCA PE CO NTIRCTO R S MALL ASS URE CO MPLIANCE WIT H APPLAUD. CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVER NING THE WORN AND/OR LAND SCAPE CO NT RACTOR SHALL VE RIFY ALIGNMENT AND LO CATION Of UN DERGRO UN D AND AB OVE GR ADE UTILITIES/IMO NECESSARY PR OTECTIONP A F NI L ry Lu N Ns u rvu RI a CLEA RUNDER GROUND UTILITIES SIM, BE INSTALLE D SO TICAT TRENVIES DO N OT CUT TI RO UOH ROOT SYSTEMS Of EXIS ,N G T REES TO REM AI N LAND SC APE ARCHITECT OF SAME IGNIAF 1,r AND ,(AfDES . irt F PR OP OS ED WA.S . I TMIL S A ND RR ROA DWA YS ARE ELEDEGT MI FIEL D DJ US,P41 1 RE QUIRE D -.C ON FORM TO LONSALIRD T OP OGR APHIC...ONIONS AND TO MI NIMIZE T REE RE MOVAL AND GRADING CHANGES IN T HE ALIG NMEN T AND GR ADES MNIST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE C ONTRACT OR SHALL REVIEW TH E SITE FOR D EFI CI ENCIE S. THE PLR T M ATERIAL SELE CTIONS AND OTHER SITE CONDITION S WHIC H MICR NEGATIVE, ARE, PUNT ESTABLISH MENT SUR., OR WARRANTY U NDESIRABLE PUNT MATERIAL SELECTIONS OR SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TOT, ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCNITECT PRIOR 70 BEGINNING, RORK L ANDSC APE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT REPRODUCAB LE AS.BUILT 0.1.W.R.C. LAN DSCAPE INSTA LLATION IRRI GATION AND SITE I MPROVEMENTS UPON C OMPAETION OF CONSTRUCT .. I NSTALUTION AND FAIOR TO PROJECT ACCEPTANCE NO PLANTS NILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAI GERDING AND C ONSTRUCTI ON HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE REA ANCE, PROVIDE THE HAVE NO V CR OT CHES AND SILRL B EGIN B RANCHING HO LONE R T HAN 3 FEET ABOVE TIIE ROOT BALL STREET AND B OULEVARD TIRES S/ ALL BEGI N BR ANCIFNG NO LOWER THAN 6 ABO VE FI NISPIED GR ADE. LAN DSCAPE CONTRACT OR IS RESP ONSIBLE FOR ONG OI NG M AINTE NANCE OF NEWLY I NSTALLED MATE RIALS U NTIL TI ME OF O RNER ACCE PTANC E ACTS Of VA NDALISM OR DAM AGE WHICH MAY 0 0CR PRIOR 70 OWNER ACC EPTAN CE S HALL BE THE RESP ONSIBILI TY Of 7 HE LA NDSCAPE CO NT RACT,. L ANDSCAPE CONTRA CT OR SHALL WARRA NTY NEW PUNT MATERIAL TH ROU GH °NE CALENDAR TEAR FR OM THE DATE OF THE OWNE R ACCEPTA NCE. NO PA R -11, AC CEPTA NCE WILL BE CO NSIDE RE D. PL ANTING ARE AS 1.11 OVE R STRuCTURERFCEIVI NG O RO,. CORR P ERE NNI AI S ANNU AL S ANOOR MINES SHAM RECEIVE A MINI MUM OF 17 DE P, OE PL ANTIN G SCA CONSISTIN G OF AT L FAST F 5 PARTS T OPSOIL 45 PARTS SCREENE D C OMPOST OR MANURE AND 10 PA RTS SA ND ANNUAL AND PE RENNI 0 PL ANTING BEns 70 RECEIVE , DEEP SH REDDED HA RDWOOD MR Cm WI TH NO ...RIF, SHRUB BED IRSSINGS RECERF DEEP S HRE DDED .om wo om MR CH MT H FIBER MAT N/FED BARR.. REFER 70 CI, FO R SITE DEmOTITI ON INP ORNRTI ON. REFE R 70 C/VIL FO R A DDITIONAL SITE GRADIN G AN D UTILI. I NFO RMATI ON . IF A DISCREPANCY EXISTS BETWEEN THE NU MBER OF PLANTS SH OWN IN THE PLANT MATERIALS SCHEDULE AND THE PLANS THE PLANS SHALL GOVERN CONTRA CTOR SI IALL ST AIR OR L OCA TION OE ALL PR OPOSED TREES FO R A PPR OVAL BE L ANDS CAPE ARCIITECT PRI OR TO INSTALL ATI ON EX APPROX. WETLAND EDG E BASED ON CLYDESDALE MARK ETPLACE FINAL PLAT Ex yXGETAnON EDGE • Ex VEGErAnoN E DGE EX . BIT -1 PATH IRRIGATION NOTES UN DRAP E C ONTRACTOR S ALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR P RO VIDI NN A PE RE OR MANCE I RRI GATION RA N AND SPECIEI CATIONS AS PART OF THE S COPE OF WORM W HEN BIDDING THESE EH. RE A PP RO /ED T HE L ANDSCAPE CON TRACTOR B. DESIG N AND INS, AN UNDERGROUN D SYST EM FOR .RVEST OF RAIN W ATER AS I NDICATED ON P SYSTE M SHALL CO NSIST OF C ATCH BASINS CON NECTE D TO R OOF D RAIN AGE DOWNS POUTS AS INDIC ATED SITE PLA NTI NGS ANY REQUIRED FILT RATION AND P UMPING E DUIPMENT SHALL BE CONSIDERED NCIDENTAL TO T HE DE SIGN AND INSTALLATIO N OF A FULLY E NINCTI ONIN G SYSTE M CONTRAC TOR SHALL SUB MIT SH OP DR AWINGS FO R LANDS CA PE ARCHITECT P RIOR TO BE GINN NG INSTALLATION CO NTR ACTOR SHAI INSTA C/VICH BA RNS AT 6.1 DIN G D OwNSPO UTS AS I NOILATES ON PLA N AL L CATCN BASINS SMILL BE SERE° TO PREVENT LERING ATE,. AND CO NNECTION POINTS MTN A NO V OC SEALER APPR OVED BY LA NDSCA PE ARCHTITE CT -THF SC OPF OF THIS WO RK ALL CONN ECTOR S FI TTI NG S ADHESII. A ND OT HER ACCESSO RIES Sim. BE CO NSI DE RED CONT RACT OR SHALL IN STALL 6. GALL ON UNDERGR OU ND C .TE RN F OR RAIN WATER HAR VEST IN APPR OXIMATE L OCATIO N AS IDE NTIFIED ON PLAN AN D CONN ECT ALL UNDERG ROUND PIPES, IN CLUDING OV ERFLOW,. SUPPLEMENTARY WATER SUPPLY TREES S HRUB A PE RE NNIAL RC S TO BF IR RIGA TED WI TH DRIP IRNIGATO N. SO D TO BF I RRI GATE D WITH S PRAY. APPR OPRIATE TO THE P ROJECT SITF CONDITI ONS ANO 70 NA N, MATER. S GR OIN, PF.X RE MENTS COORDINATE IRRIGATION SLEEMN G LO CATI ONS WITH GENERAL CONTRACT OR RAIN SE NSORS TO BE INCLUDED WIT HIN THE thRIGATI ON DESIGN . IRRIG ATION LIMITS TO EXTE ND TO STREE T B ACK OF C URB. SURVEY NOTES ALL EXISTING CONDITION . S HOWN ON TH. D RAWI NG ARE B ASE D ON AN OWNER,UR NISNED SURVEY 61, GROUP OFFERS NO GUARANTEE E MHER EXPRESSED OR I MPLIED FO R TNE A CCURAR OR RELIASILITY OF T. INDI CATED EXISTING CONDITI ONS T HE C ONT RACTOR SIRLL FIELD A RRA ALL CRITICAL EXISTIN G CONDITI ONS I NCLU DIN G BUT NOT MI MED TO .X::7,1;.f4LIrINoGF,I .LOCA OONS UTILI TY LOC ATIONS A ND INVERT ELEVATIO NS A ND ROSTING SITE GRAD ES PRI OR TO ANL OBSER VED DEVIATI ONS FROM COND MI ONS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE BROUG HT TO THE BKV GROUP A rchitec ture Interio r Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boarinan Kro os Vogel Group Inc. 222 North Second Street Minneap olis MN 5540 Teleph one: 612-339-375: Facsimile: 612-339-621: www.bkvgroup. corr Medina Townh omes Revised Site Plan Appr oval Set 07-15-14 CERTIF1CAllON I h ereby oar* thatdis pW, sp ecification or r epo rt w as prepared by me or under my direct s p ensi on and t at 1 am a ay Lic ens ed Prof 'aul Landsc ape Mrhu ect under the l aws� oftheState of Minnesota . 07-15-14 Date LK ons e Nu mber REVISIO NS N o. DATE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY CO MMISSIO N NO. 07-15-14 BKH Bpi 139073 LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN L10 0 C 2011 BKV Gr oup Inc E OE PLO TTED:7/1520 43,4 :41 PM a IVY SOD LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN 0 11111111111 IIIL!le = iron! LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: OVERSTORY/EVERGREEN TREES RE00060 ORNAMENTAL TREES REQUIRED LOW EVERGREEN SHRUBS RE041R E0 ME51C PRAIRIE SEED MIX; 50% NATIVE GRASSES/50% NATIVE DFLOW ERS BASED ON REQUIRED LENGTH OF BUFFER YARD PERIMETER (SEE TABLE BELOW) 30 = 5 5 = 0 = 44 12 60" t PROP OSED PLANTINGS 3S PROPOSED 15 PROPOSED 3 PROPOSED PR OPOSED ROPOSED EX. VELETA I0ON EDGE BUFFER YARD REQUIREMENTS- LOCATION SCORE POINT REQUIREMENT 135 NORTH BUFFER YARD EAST BUFFER YARD SOUTH BUFFER YARD .2 1 62 .1 62 WEST BUFFER YARD .1 62 BUFFER YARD P60805ED DES11N: LOC4610N PLANTING DESCRIPTION. PO INTS EACH 101615 AS PROPOSED NORTH BUFFER YARD 2 OVERSTORY TREES (2.5" CAL. ) 3 EVERGREEN TREES (3' TALL) 50, 50 12 136 EAST BU FFER YA RD 1 OVERSTORY TREE (2. 5 CAL) 4 MEDIUM 000100025 SHRUBS (24' TALL) 50 3 j_ 3 3 62 SOUTH BU1F08 8 060 1 OVERSTORY TREE (2.5" CA L. ) 4 MEDIUM DECIDUOUS 588085 (24" TALL) 50 3, 3, 3, 3 62 WEST 800100 YARD 1 O VERSTO RY TREE (2. 5" CAL.) 4 MEDIUM 000100035 STRUTS (04" TALL) 50 3 3 3 3 62 ANNUAL AND PERENNIA L RANT. BEDS TO RECEIVE, DEEP SHREDDED HARDWO OD M ULCH wnH NO WEED BAR RIER. ALL PLANTINGS WILL BE RR1GATED WITH A COMBINATION OF ROTARY SPRAY HEADS IN 128E LAWN AR EAS AND DRIP HEADS IN PLA NTING BEDS AND TREE RINGS. SHRUB UBr BED 9 M ASSINGS 80RECEIVE nary DEEP SHREDDED H ARDWOOD M610H WITH FIBER MA T NEE BA RRIER. REF TE ALL PL4NTING BEDS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM LAWN AREAS WITH STEEL EDGING BARRIER. REFER ro CIVIL FOR ADDITIONAL SITE GI IOIrvD AM D VTOTH *308)441104 ALL PLANTING BEDS SH A L BE 41'330000 W ITH SHREDDED HARDW OOD LIULCH IP A DISCREPANCY EXISTS BETWEEN THE NUM BER OF PLANTS SHOWN IN mF n A NT UA TERIA LS SCH EMA F arO TH E BANS TH E PLANS SH ALL GO VER N. GENERAL NOTES ROAD B CLYDESDALE TRAIL I...p . IRRIGATION NOTES LA ND SCA PE CON TRAC TOR SH ALL IN SPEC T THE SIT E AN D BEC OME F ANIL. WITH EX ISTING CO NDITIO NS R ELATING TO THE .TURE AND SCOPE OF WORK LANDSCAP E CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RES PONSIBLE F OR PROVIDIN G A PERFORMA NCE IR RIGATI ON PLAN AND ANDSCAPF CO NTRACTOR SHAi I VEER, IL AN I AWA IT AND DIM ENSIONS SHOWN AN D BRING TO TH E ATTENTION THE I ANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SPECIF ICA TIONS. PART OF THE SCOPE OE WORK WHEN BIDDING TH ESE SH ALL BE APP RO VED BY THE UN DSC APE DISCREPANCIES wH ICH MA, COM PROMISE TH E DESIGN AND -O R INTENT OE THE PROJECTS LA YO UT. AR CH ITECT P PUOR TO ORDER ANDOR INSTAL UTON BE THE L ANDSCAPE CONTEGLTO RS RESPONSIBILITY TO INSUR E SODDED /SE ED ED MD R ANTE D ARP As PRF IRRIGATED PR,ERL ,L=SZ ILCurplIA 0CIO R SHAI L ASSURE COMP , NCE W ITH APPLIC AKE CODES A ND REGUL ATIONS GOVERNING THE WO RK ANDOR CONTRACTOR DESIG N AND INSTALL AN UNDERGROUND SYSTEM F OR H ARVEST OF RAIN WATER AS I NDICATED ON PLAN. SYST EM SHALL CONSIS T OE CATCH BASINS CONNECTED TO R OOF DRAIN AGE DOWN SPOUTS AS INDICAT ED LAND SCAPE CO NTRACTO R SI IAL L PRO TECT EXISTIN G RO ADS. CDRBSIG UTTERS, TRAILS TREES. LAWNS ANO SITE ELEMENTS DURING ON PLA N UNDERGRO UND PIBNG AS INDICATED ON P. -A N AN U ND ERGR OUN D STCRAGE CISTE RN AS INDI CATED ON CON STRUCTIO N O PERATION S. DAMA GE TO SAM E SHA LL BE REPA IR ED AT NO ADDITO NAL COST TO THE O WNER. PLAN OV ERFLO W AND SUP PLEMENTARY WATER SUPP., AS REWIRED TO PRO,DE WATER NEEDED TO IRRIGATE ALL LA NDSCAPE CO NTRACTO R SHALL VERIFY ALIGNM EN T AND L °C ANO N Of UN DERGRO UN D A ND ABOVE GRA . UTILITIES AND PROVID E TH E DESIGN AND INST AI I ANON OE A BILLY FUNCTIONING SYSTEM CONTR ACT OR SH AL 1 SLA NG S HOP D RAWI NGS FO R NECESSAR Y PRO TECGON FOR SAME B EFORE CONSTRU CTION MA TER IAL IN STALLATION BEGIN S ININ IMUM 10-0. CLEA.N CEI. I AND SC A PE ARC HITECT PRIOR TO BEG IN NIN G IN STAL I ,TION.. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO 7.T TR ENCHES DO NO T CU-II- 11E10U . R0 07 SYSTEM S OE ANT EXISTING -TREES, CONTRA CTOR SHAL L INSTALL C ATCH BA SINS A7 BUR DING DONNSP OMTS AS INDICATED ON PLAN ALL CAT CH BASINS RILALL BE SEALED TO PREVENT LEMING Al,. AND CONNECTION POINTS WITH A NO VOC SEAL EP APPRO VED BY E XISTING C ONTOURS. TRAILS. V EGETATION. C URB/GUTTER AND OTHER ELEMENTS ARE BASED UPON INFO...DOI:50,0ED TO THE LANDSCAP E ARCIFITECT. UNDSC APE AR C, T ECT BY OTHERS. LANDSCAP E CONTRACT. SHALL VERIFY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR 70 CONSTRUCTIO N AND NOT , I ANOSOAPE A RLO TEC, OF SAN, CONTRACTOR SHAL INSTAL I a. DIA PVC DRA IN AG E PIPE CONN ECTING OCA RNSP011 S. TO uNDERGROUNDLISTERN FOR RAIN W ATER .RVEST . INDICATED ON PLAN LOC ATIONS SHOWN ON PLAN A RE EDP ILLUST RATION .1., i'070g1=C?P 'gZa7C717ECIZO'N'SE/LZAT(11Z1=1P'ErREMS=P'ArG. '=E5tg Trrr/rNI'AFInU NIDTRZETIZr' OR T DETERMINE FINAL LOC ATION AN D O UAN TITES FO R ALL UNDERGR OUND DRAI NA GE PIPE A NO OR ISPESPO.IBLE FOR COORDINA TING LOCAT ION, DPUIN PIPE TO A VOID CONFLI CTS WI TH OTHE R .001.0.0 UT, IRES 41. C ON NECT.S FITTIN GS ADH ESIVE A ND O THER ACCESS ORIES SHALL BE CONSIDERED `47g..=-M71,-ZsA 7%Lc7rprg',-7E7r:BTL=T=ON F:MiZZYrr"'SL "TP',1, 4'"'i N ANA% 'ETIl'AEF""-Ej'D' OirStI-E INCIDEN TAL AN D APE INCLU DED IN THE SCORE OF TIRE nADRIL CON DITIO NS SHALL BE BRO UG HT TO THE ATTE NTION OF THE LAN DSCAPE ARCHI7ECT PRIOR 70 BEGINN. OF WO RK. CO NTRACTOR SHAL L INST ALL CNC GALLON UNDER GROU ND C ISTERN FOR RA IN WATER G AFFE s 7 IN A PPROGNA TE I WAD. AS ID ENTIF IED ON PI AN A ND C ONNEC T A LL UN DE RG ROUN D PIPES. ING LLANO MERE. OW AND UND SUPE CON TRA CTOR L PREPARE AND SuBM I7 REPRO DUCIBI F AGSVILT DR AWING S, OF LANDSCARE INS, A L A TION IR RIGATIO N .0 SOP, EMEN TARY WATER S., Y. ME IM PROV EM ENTS UPO N COM, F LIO N OE CONSTRUCBO N INSTAI I ANO N AND PRIOR TO PR OJEC T ACCEPTANC E. TR EE S. SHRUB 6 PERENNIAL BEDS TO BE IRR IG ATED WITH D RIP IRRIG ATIO N SO O 70 BE IR RIGATED WITH SP., NO PLANTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRA DING AND CO NSTRUCTION .5 BEEN CO MPLETED IN TRE IMM EDIATE AR EA PROP OSE D PLA NT MATERIAL SH ALL COM PLY WITH THE LATEST EDITIO N OF THE AM ERICAN STANDARD F. NURSERY STOCR. ANSI TEO, UNDSCAPE CO NTRA CTO R SHA LL PRO VIDE THE O WNER W ITH A WATERIN GLAWN IRRIGA TIO N SCHEDULE 'ar:Ore7FO'TC=AZ ;;ITLMTNr eITN G'NLO IA01'VEA;TLEHA VECEErAVO' V;7H :PROCOTALHLE%L'A=ALZUISTZET- AP PROPRIATE TO TH E PROJE CT SITE CO NDITION S AND TO PUNT MATERIALS GROWTH REQ UIREMENTS. C OORDINATE IRRIGATI. SL FEL T. LOCA TION S MTH G ENER AL CONTRACT.. SHALL BEGIN Bruno.. NO LO WER THAN 8' ABOV E FINISHED G RAD E LAN DSC AP E CONTRACTOR_ PLAN, T I.IRA ETERIA L TH ROU GH O NE CALEN DAR LEA R F RON TH E DATE TNE OWNER PLANING A REAS INO T OVER STR UCTUR E, RECEIVIN G G ROUND CO VER PERENNIALS ANNUALS A ND,. VINES SH ALL RECEIVE A M INIMU M 0, .2T DEP TH OE PLANT ING SO IL C ONSISTIN G OE AT LEAST aS PA RT S TO PSOIL AS PA RTS SCREENED COMP OST OR MANURE A ND .0 PAR TS SAND C ONTRACTO R SH AL I STAK E O UT O CAGON OF Ai P ROPOSED TREF S FOR A PPROVA L By AN DSCA PE ARCHITECT PR IOR TO INSTAI I ATIO N RA IN SENS.S TO BE INCI UD ED viDHIR THE IRRIGATION DESIGN. IRR IGATION LIMITS TO EXTEND TO STREET BACK OF C uBS SURVEY NOTES AIL ExISTING CONDITIONS S HOWN ON TNS DRA IN, A RE BASED ON AN OWNER -EU RNISH ED SUR VE Y BIG , GRO UP O FFERS NO G UARANTEE EGG ER EXPRESSED OR IMP LIED FOR THE ACCURAC, OP RELIABILITY THE INDICATED EXISTING CONDITIONS THE C ONTRAC TO R SHA LL F IELD VE RIF, ALL CRIT ICAL EXISTIN G CON DITIO NS IN CLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO EX IST ING BU ILDING LOC ATIONS URI, LOCAT IONS AND IN VERT ELEV ATION S AND FASTIN G SITE GRADES P RIOR TO THE START OF WM,. �''•j, E X. VEGETATION EDGE j BUCKH / VINYL -COATED CAIN -411 Ci14/ LINK EXIS nNc BunDNG EX A PP RO X. WETLAND EDGE BASED ON CLYDESDALE MARKETPLACE FI NAL PLAT £ VEx LETA l7OIy EDGE EX. VEGETATION EDGE EX. BIT PT H PROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE QTY. SYN COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME ME TYPE CO MMENTS CANOPY TREES(20 TOTAL) 6 A PRINCETON ELM 5 B SWAMP WHITE OAK 9 C MAJESTY SUGAR MAPLE Ul mus encria1 a'Pnew1c Ouemus bicolor Acer saccha mm'Flax Mir 25' CAL BBB 2.S' CAL B88 25' CAL B&8 PLANT PER PLAN PLANT PER PLAN PUNT PER PLAN EVERGREEN TREES (55 TOTAL LARGE F 3 SMALL) 3 D 60)100 PINE 2 E WHITE PINE 13 F NORWAY SPRUCE E mus sllcbu5 P'ilws snob:, 8145 Boos 3 CONT. 0 BBB 6' B&B PUNT PE R PL AN PUNT PER PLAN PLANT PER PLAN ORNAMENTAL TREES )15 TOTAL) 3 G AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY A m5Nnchler x gran 41tbra'Autumn Bihar. ' 4 H DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH Betua 4atyphyie 'Fargo 0 I HARVEST GOL D CRABAPPLE Ma'u5'Harv851 Gold 16 CAL B&B 1.6 CAL. B&B 1 5' CAL BBB PANT PER PLAN PLANT PER PLAN PANT PER PLAN 516280 56 TOTAL) 6 J SEM SORBARIA 3) K MISS KI M LILAC 13 L MANEY JUNIPER Sorbana 5ordr0la 'Se m' Syrnga patue 'Mos Khi 14611 005Chl8065$ 'Merseyi 24' TALL MIN . CONT . 24" TALL M IN. CONT. 24' TALL MIN. CONT . PUNT PER PLAN PLANT PERPLAN PL440 PE R PLAN BKV GROUP Architectur e Int eri or Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Bo atm an K roos Vog el Group Inc . 222 North Sec ond Street Minneap olis MN 55401 Telephone: 612-339-3752 Facsimile: 612-339-6212 www.bk vgroup .c om Medina Townh omes Revised Site Plan Appr oval Set 07-15-14 CERTIRCAT1 ON !h ereby was by .9 c ereN that this edr�on or'report wpr epared by me or u ncle- my dic e supervisi on and that 1 ern a duly Li onised Pm->nar , Ladrape Architect under th e laws of the Stat e o/ Minn esota. 07-15-14 Date --kke ne Number REVISI ONS N o. DATE DATE DR AWN BY CHECKED BY COM MISSION NO . 139073 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN L101 0 2011 BKV Gr oup, Inc E OE CONT RIDGE V ENT IRv .1) SHAKE SIDING (SW 5) ASP HALT SHIN GLES ,ASR - ALU M FASCIA iSMF-21 W/,OFF (RV 2) ALU M G UTTER (SMF,)D,_W/ ROU RE6IN-RLACE SPLASH BLOCK ,x6 CO RNER BO ARDS LAP SIDING SDG -2) 1,0 TRIM wRA R wINUw(=_ AND DO OR S W/ 1.x.6 TRIM TW FGA EGRICK FGB-1) RG ADS 26 BUILDING 1 - WEST ELEV (TYP BLDGS 1,4,9) CO NT RIDGE VENT (RV -1) A SPHAL T SHING LES ,ASR -1) SH AKE SIDING ISD GS) {A av z, FA SCIA (SMF-2) W/ SOFFIT ALUM GU TT ER ,SMF_,IDS. w, POURE0.iNPLACE SPLA SH BLO CK 1. CO RNER BO ARDS LA P SIDING (8DG2) 1,0 TRIM KASO TA S TO NE C OLUMN BASE CAP TYR. BR ICK,FB,) SIDES FACING STREETS WRAP WINDOWS AND DOORS VV/ ,x6 TRIM TVR BUILDING 1 - NORTH ELEVATION (TYP BLDGS 1,4,9) CON T RIDGE V ENT (RV -1) - ASPH ALT SHINGLES (ASR -1) ALUM. FASO (RV -2) 1r6 CORNEA BOARDS AP WINDOWS AND DOORS VV/ 1x6 TRIM TVP . SHA KE SIDING ,SDGS) FIT 1x 10 TRIM ER ISMF-,)'AI W/ Po uREo-waLACESRLasN eLoc K KASOTA STON E COLUMN BASE CAP (STN 1) TYP. BR ICKFA CE ECIN Ar ON SIDES G STREET O VERHEAD GARAGE DO OR III -'-I-IsnIns I--1-1m alra�lr•Ir•Ir•Ir•Ir•Ir.l�_ -1- r. r.I.I�ir•,�Ir l <. .41111 ris,ImirsKss. BUILDING 1 - EAST ELEVATION (TYP BLDGS 1,4,9) CO NT RIDG E VENT (RV , ) SHAKE SIDING ocs ) ASPHAL T SHING LES ,ASR -1) ( "'A( av Ml uM G UTTER (SINE-,) D. s. w/ F WRE0.1NR lA CE SRASH BLOCK x6 COR NER BOARDS - LAP SIDING (SDG -2) 1,0 TRIM CEEIGK (FB„ qJ >IDEE FAC ING STREE TS WRAP WINDO WS AND DOORS x6 TRIM TYP KASO TA STON E CO LUMN B ASE CAP,STN,) rw_ 1/2 BUILDING 1 - SOUTH ELEVATIO N (TYP BLDGS 1,4,9) 26 TRL ,BEARING �Icci=cl==1==1==1==1==1==1=-1 mm•IMI I=I MIIMIIlIfIM[MM'f •I ,IniImlmimim1oo1osUsa1ss '= wiIaslIsalasilmimimIm1 - I.I�I.I-I�I�1-1.I-I-- -I-II•l�i•I-I•I-�I_ __ 26, 6 HEEL E EVATIO N TRUW. EABIN ' $ HEEL ELEVATION TRUSS BEgl TYR Lot HEELELE'A9 -aT J }� ROOF LEVEL - BUILDING 1 (TYP BLDGS 1,4,9) 365/8 227 in 6 e 7/s" 1 5 w 1111111111111 LEVEL 02 - BUILDING 1 (TYP BLDGS 1,4,9) LEVEL 01 - BUILDING 1-(TLDGS 1,4,9) 1/2 111 C�� (! 1=I@III1I 11111111 I 111111111111111 eilmemiermiom i BKV GROUP Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boo rman Krooa Vogel Group Inc. 777 North Sec ond Street Minneapolis MN 55401 Telephone: 612-339-3752 Facsimile: 612-339-6212 www.bkvgr oup.com 110. #41119 DOMINIUM IBs0'REVISED SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET 07-02-2014 PROJECT TITLE Medina Townhomes KEY PLAN N ORTH ARROW CERTIFIC ATI ON I h ereby certify that th is plan sp ecificati on or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional und er the laws of the State of Minnesota. c 14209 License Number 04-25-2014 Date REVISION DATE D ATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSI ON NO. SHEET TITLE 0 0-07.2019 'NAB CEP MN 1393 73 BUILDINGS 1, 4, 9 PLANS & EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A101 © 2014 BKV Group Inc. EOE C ONT RID GE VENT ( RV -1) C OMP SHAKE SI DIN G (SDG5) AS PHALT SHINGLES ( ASR -1) C OMP. L AP SIDI NG ) SDG2) ,A4 2; FASCIA TSME2) WI S OFFIT ER(SMF-1)05 W, P DDRE D IN PL ACE SPLASH BLaK C ORNER BDs . ,xd WDELKG, 1 ,0 WD-BLKO1 W/ S ME-2 WP WPM,'A ND DO OR MD xe D-BLKG-1 W, S MF-2 TYP. g5 (SONS .� DL DMNBASE COMP L AP SIDING (S DCH21 BUILDING 2 & 3 WEST ELEVATION 0T RIDGE VENT (RV -1) ASP HALT SH ING LES IASR-1) COMP SHAKE SIDING (503-5) CO MP LAP SIDING (SDG -2) U2FASCIA (SMF-2( WI SC0FIT ) WRA P N OW AND DOO R W/1 ES CO RNER DO S tx E WDBLKG, ALUM M G UTTER (SMF, D ,MI POU RED -IN -RACE SFUSH BLOC K CO MP LAF' DING SDG2) CAP(s�1) EPaDMN SSE FACE BRICK FP -E OVERHEAD GARA GE DOOR 2,10 HFFLEL_,0TII 4 TS Usse aaw c h. 544-,5 5H a• 4 s -� _ - -. T-I-TI-l•=r-T -TT-J-1 -I. Ara BUILDING 2 & 3 SOUTH ELEVATION CO NT RIDG E VEN T (93-1) CO MP �ISHAKE SID ING (500-5) C A LUM FASC IA (SM F-2) W, SOFFIT (RV 2) PO URED r PLACE SPAASH BLOC COMP- LAP SIDING )SD G-2) CORN ER WS tv6 WDBLKGI WI SM F-2 1,0 WD-BLKG1 W/ SMF-2 KASO TA ONE CO LUMN BASE CAP,STra1) TYP. WO-BLK MOWAN D POO R PIPP. BUILDING 2 & 3 NORTH ELEVATION 118" = 1-0 HEELEL00HTI ON J� 9-D Y TRLS-110,4 57 4 LEVEL p HEEL ELEVATI ON 4 TRUSS B A RING 4 „D°SL,00 4 DS z0 �i CO NT RIDGE VENT (RV 1) CO MP. SHAKE SIDING (SD GS) ASPH ALT SHING LES ASR -1 ) CO MP LA P SIDING (SOG2) IRv M FA S CIA (SM F-2) V:, SO FFIT CORNER BDs lwwo-eLKG1 I 1x10 WD-BLKG, W, SMF-2 uM o0 ER(SM F.1) D, S. 00 Po uR IN -PLACE SPusH BLo c FACE BRICK (501) COM P LAP SIDING (SOU -1) KASO TA STO NE CAP (STN -1) CO LUMN BASS D DOOR Wn.D BUILDING 2 & 3 EAST ELEVATION LELEV AT-6 50005 00151 GING 4 0x14 LEVEL 02 - BUILDING 2 & 9 22-1,1a SEE S HEET q_02 LEVEL 01 - BUILDING 2 & 9 • S, zS HEET IN OM SEE SHEE02 29 „a ROOF AB OVE SEE SHEET A.222 is (v .P.1>- SEE S HE SEES EE°ATD2 o -- L 2.2 2.3 P REFINISHED META* GU TTER 500 PREF WISHE D METAL GIERER -TYP VALLEY FLASHIN G- TYP BKV GROUP Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Bowma n Kroos Vogel Gro up Inc 222 North Sec ond Street Minneapolis MN 55401 Teleph one: 612-339-3752 Facsimil e: 612-339-6212 www .bkvgr oup.c om DOMINIUM IssulREVISED SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET 07-02-2014 PR OJECT TITLE Medina Townhomes KEY PLAN NORTH ARR OW CERTIFICATION I hereby certify th at this plan, specification or report was prepar ed by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a d uly Licensed Professi onal under the laws of th e State of Minnesota . 17 14209 Licens e Number 04-25-2014 Date REVISION DATE DATE DRAW N BY CHE CKED BY C OMMISSION NO. SHEET TITLE 07-02-2014 TMB CAP MN 1203 BUILDING 2 AND 3 PLANS & EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET NU MBER A102 ROOF LEVEL - BUILDING 2 & 3 © 2014 BKV Group. Inc . EOE T RIDGE VENT (RV-„ ASPHA LT SHINGLES (A SR -1) COM P. SHAKE SIDING (505-5) CO MP LA P GI 2 M FASCIA ISM F-2) WI SO FFIT (RV -2) 1x 10 w DBIH Gt VV SM F2 VVRAP WD w AND DO,R VII 115 VVDb LKG1 W/ SMF-2 TSP. CORNER BPS 1,6 VVEKBLKG-1 M 2 ER (SL -1) OS. Wr PO URE61rv�L BLO CK COMP LAP SIDIN G ISM -2i KASO TA STO NE COLU MN BASE CAP N-1), TYR. SIDES FACING)STREE rS O VERHEAD GA RAGE POO R CON T RIDG E VENT IRV-1) COM P SHAK E SID ING ISDG -5) ASPHALT SHINGLES (A SR -1) CO MP LA PSIDING (SDG2 ALUM FASC IA(SMF-2)Wr SOFFIT (RV -2) CO RN ER MS, 1rtwIIBU(GI W/SMF-2 1,0 SVP .BLKG -1 WI SMF-2 BUILDING 5 FRONT ELEVATION UTTER�SMF-,)D.SWi CURED-II�LPIAC E SPLASH BLOC K FACE BRICK (F61) CO MP. LAF SONG ISM -2) KASO TA STO NE CO LUMN BASE C AP ISTN TYP WRAP WPW AN D DOO R WH, 6 WD,BLKG1 WrSMF-2 T.P 26 EE BUILDING 5 SIDE ELEVATION CS N TRU SS BEAR IN G i-rl`g 141L4- LEVE L o SONS RIDGE VEN T IR V-1) COMP. SHA KE SIDING ISM -51 ASP HALT SHIN GLES (ASR -1) ALUM. FA (SIAM) (S) Wr SOFFIT G UTTERALUM (S MF-1) as. W/ PO URED -IN -PLACE SPLA SH BLO CK CO MP. LAP SIDIN G (SOG2) WrCORNER BP S, 1x5 W6BLKG 1910 wo-BLKG- 1wrSMF-2 FACE BR A. KASOTA STONE COLUMN BASE CAP (STN -1) MP. AP MN/ A ND DOO R V✓/16 W D %xG1 w/ SMF-2, T W. BUILDING 5 REAR ELEVATION H EEL ELEVATIO N 119 6 TRUSS BEARING -1" e�z-3 SS 16-0 o Y Li T nom'® al i ag el $g 1 - oT/6 LTA e �si -Y f, t '. I oS-0 BRE 3BRDM I"�1 f I q WAL ABO VE -,1 16- 11 3 RO C 5.1 5.2 a 5 .3 LEVEL 01 - BUILDING 5 RE, LEVEL 02 - BUILDIN G 5 BKV GROUP A rchitecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boa rman Kroos Vogel Group Inc . 222 N orth Sec ond Street Minneapolis MN 55401 Teleph one: 6 12-339-3752 Facsimile: 612-339-6212 www .bkvgr oup.c om *if DOMINIUM ISSU,REVISED SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET 07-02-2014 PROJECT TITLE Medina Townhomes KEY PLAN NORTH ARROW CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, speafication or r eport was pr epared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 14209 Licens e Number 04-25-2014 Date REVISION DATE DATE DR AWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NO. SHEET TITLE 0Tm-2014 Amhsr Ch eck er 1393]3 BUILDING 5 PLANS & ELEVATIONS SHEET NU MBER A105 ROOF LEVEL - BUILDING 5 © 2014 BKV Group Inc , EOE C ONT RID GE VENT (PV 1) LAP SI DID,2) ASPHAL T SHIN GLES (ASR -1) SHAKE SIDEN G (SD., IRV-2) ALU M GU TTER ISMF -t) D,S. Wi P OURED-I,FLA CE SPLASH BLOCK WRA P WI NDOWS A hO DOORS W, 1. TRIM TY ➢. FACE BRICK (00-1) KASOTA ONE C OLUMN BASE CAP (STN -1), T YP_ O VERHEAD GARAGE D OOR (OHo-1) CO NTR IDG E VEN T (R V_1) A SPHALT SHINGLES ,ASR -1) SHAKE SIDING ISDG 51 LAP SIDING (SOG- 2) ALUM FASC IA (SM F-2) W, SOFFIT (RV 2) gBUILDING 6 WEST ELEVATION PCUP G UTTER ACEFS LASH BLO CK 'WC TRIM WRI, WIND OWS 1. TRIM NP FACE BRICK (FBL BUILDING 6 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATION UNIT C„NT RIDGE V EN T (R V -1) ASPHALT SHING LES (ASR-, LA P SIDING W2) ALUM FA SCIA ISMF JM GU TTER 1SMF,D.B WI PCOREOINRA CE SP LA SH BLOC 1,0 TRIM WR AP WINDGNS AND DO ORS w, +6 TRIM TYR. FACE BRIC K (FELT O BUILDING 6 EAST ELEVATION ��iuR va6 Et 5 6 L6v EL �2 tip Tius : Ba so 6 .1 LEVEL 01 - BUILDING 6 ,6 =1-D gROOF LEVEL - BUILDING 6 BKV GROUP Architectur e Interior Design Landscape Architect ur e Engineering yBy oo� am�tm�a n ICroo • Vogel Gr oup Inc 222 North Second Stre et Min neapolis MN 55401 Teleph one: 612-339-3752 Facsimile: 612-339-6212 www .bkvgroup.com DOMINIUM ISS''REVISED SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET 07-02-2014 PROJECT TITLE Medina Townhomes KEY PLAN N ORTH ARROW CERTIFICATION I h ereby certify that this pl an, speelficae on r report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Prof essional under the law s of the Stat e of Minn esota . �i� 14209 License Number 04-25-2014 Date REVISION DATE DATE DRAW N BY CHECKED BY CO MMISSIO N NO. SHEET TITLE 0]02-^_014 Checker 139:.'3 BUILDING 6 PLANS & ELEVATIONS SHEET NU MBER A106 © 2014 BKV Group, Inc. EOE STON E VEN EER CHIMN EY CCN T RIDG E VENT (RV.1) ASPHALT SHINGLES (ASR. SHAKE SIDIN G (S00-5) ALU M FASCIA (SMF-21W/ SO RER (Rv .2) ER (SMF-1(D S. W/ rouRBo-lNCLacE sPLASH aLo c 1. COR NER BOARDS 1,0 TRIM FACE BRICK (FB. 1) AD WINDOWS AND 1. TRIM TYP LA P S DI AG -2) CLUB HOUSE NORTH ELEVATION cl,�e�,� sx rac STO NE VENEER CHIMNEY SHAK E SIDING . DG -51 ASP HA LT SHINGL ES (ASR -7 ALUM FA SCIA (SMF-1 , W/SOFFIT (RV -2) v v10 TRIM UM GU TTER (SMF•ti D.S. W/ POURED -IN -PLACE SPLA SH BLOC 1x6 CORNER BOARDS FA CE BRICK (F.1( VVRAP ...WS AND DOO RS LAP SIDING RIMpDG-2) CLUB HOUSE EAST ELEVATION yEVFL 51$ STO NE VENEER CHIMNEY CON T RDG E GE, (RV 1( ASPHALT SH INGLES (ASR -1( S NAKE SIDING (SDG5) ALUM A s_IA . MF-2) w/ SO FFIT (RV -2j UM GUTTER (SMF-1 LA S W/ ROUFED-IN-PLACE SPLASH BLO CK 1. CORNER BOARDS 1 y 10 TR IM FACE BRICK (FB- 1 WRAP TS AND DOCK S 1. RIM T LAP SIDING (SDG -2) ()CLU B HOUSE SOUTH ELEVATION = T -0' 7. 0 STONE VENEER CHIM NEY FO NT RIDGE VEN T (RV 1) A SPHALT SHIN GLES (ASR -1( SHAKE SID IN G(5.51 ALUM FASCIA (SMF-2,, WI SO FFIT (RV 2) ALU M GUTTER (SMF-1( D.S.'WI POURE0.1N-PLACE SPLASH BLOCK 1. CO RNER BOARDS 1x10TRW FACE BRICK (001) nPWRN SAND DOO RS T. NAP SIDING (SLG.2, CLUB HOUSE WEST ELEVATION CI ogrVz' LEv 0" R. 1' b' 04 7.0 CD 7. 3 8-4 aC 0 r lOs NO TE: SEE A205 FOR INTERIOR ELEVATIO NS AND FINISHES CLU Ro AA BA „FF,,,,,Eno LOA M OB M AIN T 109 ROO F ABOVE __� we TIEULE t01 O FFICE I15 TO ILET 104 OIL 1 0. MANAG ER OFFIC E SL ILIIIL uunnuu,llwu wwn unu uuuu mnu uwl,uuul Ds w w a 10 z1 to BUILDING 7 - CLUB ROOM FLOOR P N Roof Level - Club House Ira =T-0 7.A CH IMNEY PREFINISHED MET AL GUTTER TYP . COF ITC JOE PITCH ea gs RIDGE VENT TYP, 6 ROOF PITCH VALLEY FL AS HIN G-T YP A10 14209 BKV GROUP Archite cture Interio r Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Bo wman Kroos Vogel Group Inc . 222 North Sec ond Street Minneapolis MN 55401 Telephone: 6 12-339-3752 Facsimile: 612-339-6212 www.bkvgr oup .c om DOMINIUM Issu)REVISED SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET 07-16-2014 PROJECT TITLE Medina Townhomes KEY PLAN NORTH ARROW CERTIFICATION I hereby c ertify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professi on al under the laws of th e State of Minnesota . 04-25-2014 License Number Date REVISION DATE DATE DR AWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSI ON N O. SHEET TITLE Or -15-2014 MN 1393 11 BUILDING 7 PLANS & EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A107 © 2014 BKV Group, Inc . EOE C ONT RIDGE VENT (RV) ASPHALTSHIN GLES (A SHAKE SIDIN G (SOLO -5) BRACE 9RD.5. W/ ro uREo-N.PL sH accK ALUM F ASCIA(S MF-2 W/ SOFFIT V2) 1. CORNER BOARDS pP v.,NW.N'S AM DO O RS W11. TRI M 1), LAP SIDIN G SO G t) "MO TRIM KAS OTA ST ONE C OLUMN BASE CAP TYR FACE BRICK (F&1) ED BUILDIN G 8 SOUTH ELEVATI ON C ONT RIDGE VENT (RAM) ASPHALT SHIN GLES (ASR -1) SHAKE SIDI NG ( SD G-5, ARUM FA SCI IS MF-aw/soFRP LAP SIDING is, 1) x6 C ORN. B OARDS 1 ,C TRIM POUM GUTTER (SMF-1) D.S . W/ RED -IN -PLACE SPLASH BL OCK W RAP WINDO WS AND DOOR S W/ 1.6 TRIM T VP KAs oSA ST cTE caUMN BASE AP,STN-,) T, P_ FACE BRICK (FB-, ) L AP SIDING 150 0-1) 21 0 BUILDING 8 WEST ELEVATION HEEL ELE VATIO N TPUSSBEA RI HEELE'EV'TIIXJ Lelv „E±. o' LEVEL6t B6 0 26 -10 1 n' CO OT RIDG E VEN T (RV -A ASPHALT SHINGLE S )ASR -1) SHAKE SIDING (SOG-5) ALUM FAS CIA WI SO FFIT (RV. 2) LAP SIDING )S0C-2) 1.6 CO RNER BO ARDS VVRAP WINDO WS AND DOO RS WI ,x P ALUM GU TTER 1505-1, as. W/ P]UREPINYLA CE SP LA SH BLOCK LAP SIDING ‘SDG-21 1.10 TRIM KA SOTA STONE COLUMN BASE C AP (STN -1) nP FACE BR ICK (55-1) BUILDING 8 NORTH ELEVATION C ONT PIDG E V ENT (RV - 1) ASPHALT SHINGLES (ASR -1) SHAKE SIDING (SD0-5) ALUM. F ASCIA (SM F-2) W/ SOFFIT UM GUTTER )5,-1) O. S. W/ rouREPIN- RACE SPLA SH BLO CK "x6 CO RNER BO ARDS LAP SIDING (5 IX,I WRAP WIN DOWS AND DO OR 1.6 TRIM TTP FACE KA SO TA A STO NE CO L UMN LUMN BASE OAP (STN ),). TVP. BUILDING 8 EAST ELEVATION HEEL ELEVATION 9'-6 TR USS 05001 !G t,o02 �si16 LE VEL 6,.. oo.a PREEINIS HED METAL GUTTER -TVP ROOF LEVEL - BUILDING 8 -� I � - - i HEET - ill .01 � ® �������� .01 ■un�ii B, ® LEVEL 02 - BUILDING 8 LEVEL 01 - BUILDING 8 O„5 =,a BKV GROUP Architecture Interior Desig n Landscape Architecture Engin eering Bo orman Kroos Vogel Group Inc. 222 North Second Street Min neap olis MN 55401 Telephone: 612-339-3752 Facsimile: 612-339-6212 www.bkvgr oup.com 4111, DOMINIUM IssulRE VISED SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET 07-02-2014 PROJECT TITLE Medina Townhomes KEY PLAN NORTH ARROW CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specificati on or report was prepared by me or under my dir ect supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Prof essional und er the law s of the Stat e of Minn esota. ie 14209 License Number 04-25-2014 Date REVISION SHEET TITLE DATE 67-02,014 Cnecker 1393 73 BUILDING 8 PLANS & EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET N UMBER A108 © 2014 BKV Gro up , In c. EOE BKV ELECTRICA L LUMINAIRE FIXTURE SCHEDULE NEW 26 UNITS ID FIXTURE TYPE MO UNTING VOLTS LAM P CONTOL M EDIA (LENS. LOUV ERS, ETC.) DESCRIPTION M ANUFACTURER SERIAL NUMBER NOTES QTY WATTS TYPE XP OVERHEAD AREA ROADWAY SING LE HEAD 20' EXTERIOR PO LE 120 V 1 75 W LED/4000K FLAT GLASS LENS -FULL CUTOFF TYPE 3 DISTRIBUTION LITHONIA MR1-LED XP1 OVERHEAD AREA ROAD WAY SINGLE HEAD 15' EXTERIOR POLE 120 V 1 75 W LED/4000K FLAT GLASS LENS -FULL CUTOFF TYPE 3 DISTRIBUTION LITHON IA MR 1-LED XU EX TERIO R UPLIGHT SIGNLIGHT ABOVE G RADE 120 V 1 10 W LED FLOOD AND SPOT REFLECTORS INCLUDED, BLACK FINISH FLAB LIGH TING HBLED SERIES XW EX TERIOR BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHTING BUILDING MO UNTED 120 V 1 12 W LED BRONZE HO USING RA B LIG HTING SLIM 12N/PC (PHOTO CELL) ' 0. 0 '0 0 C 0 '0. 0 0 . 0 'C . 0 '0 0 '0 0 ' 0. 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 0 '0. 0 0 0 '0 . 0 0. 0 'C . 0 '0 J 0 . 0 C 0 0 0 '0 0 '0 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 C 0 C 0 '0. 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0. 0 ' 0. 0 ... 0 '0 0 '0. 0 C . 0 '0 . 0 ' 0. 0 C . u , 0 0. G '0 0 ' 0. 0 0. 0 'C . 0 0 0 '0. 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 'C . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . C 'C . 0 '0 0 '0 . 0 C . 0 '0 . 0 'o . 0 C . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 'C . 0 0 . 0 C . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 'e . 0 0 . 0 '0 c 0 '0 . 0 0 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 e . 0 0 . 0 0 . o '0 . 0 0 0 C . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 .1 0 .1 '0 . 1 0 . 0 . 0.. 0 0 . 0 o . a 0 . 0 0 . 0 . o '0 . ] 0 .: C . 1 0 .1 0 .1 c . l 0 n G . 0 C . o O . J 0 . 0 0 ... 0 . 0 0 . 0 c . c '6 o 'c . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 C . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 .0 . o 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 9 O . o '0 . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . C o 0 .1 '0 . 1 C . 1 '0 . 1 0 . '0 1 '0 .1 0 . 1 C . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 C 0 '0 . J '0 . 0 C . 1 '0 . L 0 . 1 C . 1 '0 .1 '0 .1 '0 1 '0 1 0 .1 0 1 '0 0 '0 . 0 J 0 '0 . c 0 . 0 i.. 0 0 . 0 0 0 C . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 v" . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 'o . 0 '0 . 0 'o . 0 - '0 . 6 '0 . 7 0 . 6 0. 3 0. 1 0. 2 '0 . 6 '1 . 0 '1. 4 1. 7 '1. 4 1 . 0 'C .] '0 . 7 0.] C. 7 0 "! 0.] 'c . 7 '0 s '1 .1 '1. 5 1 6 1. 5 '1. 2 '0 8 '0 . 5 '0 . 4 0 . 6 0. 9 '0 . 8 n 9 0. 8 C. ] 0 s 0. 2 C 1 0 z 0 4 0 4 0 4 0. 2 '0 . l C .1 0. 0 C. 0 t. t 0. 0 xc nn 3 '1 4 5 C 1 2 2 . 2 ' 1. 9 '1. 5 0 . 8 '0 . 2 '0 . 3 '0 . 6 ' 1. 0 '1 . 3 '1 . 3 '1. 3 '1. 3 1 . 1 1 1 . . 4 1. 2 1 3 1. 2 1 . 31. 2 0 . 5 0 6 1 1 2 '1 . 4 '1 . 8 L . ] 2 . 2 ' 6 '1 ' '1 . 2 '. '' ' '. 0 0 ' 1. 4 2 . 0�0 1 . 8 . ... . _ . . 8 '1 . 9 '1 . 1 '0 . 6 '0 . 3 '0 .1 '0 0 '0 . c 0 . 0 .J -I xP OT o S. 3 '0 9 '1 5 '1. . 3 '2.22 '1. 9 ' 1. 5 '0 . e C .1 '0 . 3 '0 . _ 0 9 '0 . 9 'C . 8 'C . 6 '0 . 6 '0 . 6 '0 . 6 '0 . 9 "1. 3 '1. 5 '1 . 4 '1 . 2 '0 . 8 0 . 6 '0 . 6 '0 . 5 '0 . 6 0 . 5 'C . 5 '0 . 4 '0 . 2 'C . 3 '0 . 4 '0 . 8 '1. 1 '1 . 3 '1 .1 1.1 1 . 5 '1 . 3 'C . 9 '1. 0 '1. 5xP'1 . 9 2 . 3 '1 . 4 'C . 5 '0 . 3 '0 . 1 0 . 0 '0 . c '0 . 0 - '0. 0 -0. 0 0. 0 0 . 0 '0 .1 ' 0. 1 '0 . 5 '1 . 0 '1 . a ' 1. 5 '1 .1 '0 .4 '0 . 3 '0.1 ' 0.1 '0. 0 '0. 0 '0 . 0 '0. 0 '0 . 0 . 0 0 . 0 ' 0. 0 C . 0 '0 . 0 '0 0 C . 0 '0 . 0 '0. 0 ' 0. 1 0. 1 '0. 4 1 . 1 kN-0 0 0 . ri ,.. 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 1 '0 . 1 '0 . 2 '0 . 3 '0 . 3 '0 . 3 '0 . 2 0 .1 '0 . 1 0 . 0 C . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 o . J '0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 0 '0 . 1 0 . 4 '0 . 9 . _ '0 5 '0 . 5 '3 . 2 '1 . 5 0 5 1. 5 '1. 8 '2 .1 '1 . 7 '0 _ 8 '0 . 3 '0 . 2 '0 . 1 '0 . 0 0 . 0 0 0 ' 0. c 0. 0 '0 0 _ 1 0.. 0 3 0. c 1 . 2 '1 3 '1. 0 0. 6 ' 0. 2 'c 1 0. 0 ' 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 '0 0 ' 0. 0 ' 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 '0 . C 0. 0 '0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 .4 '1. 3 '0 . 5 0.. '0.1 0 . 1 "1 ." '2 . 1 1 . _ 1 . 5 '2 . 0 xP n.n 0.1 'o _ 0.2 'c.s 3.c 1.z '2.0 l. e i.6 '0.9 ' c. z "0 .1 "0 .0 '0 . 0 '0 .0 "0 .0 "0 .0 .0 .0 ' ..0 *0 .0 "0 .0 '0 .1 'o.: . 0.4 '0 .5 b.7 '0.7 '0.4 'o.> ID .1 '0 .1 .0 .0 *0 .0 0.0 .0 .0 "0 .0 ,,.1°,40 .1,roo.4 '0 .8 .1 .0 l.z '0.9 '0.7 0.4 'e.4 •c .s 'e.6 'e.s 1 0. 2 '0 5 '1 0 1 . 5 1 9 2 . 4 2 . 2 '1 . 8 1 - 6 ' 0. 2 '0. 1 '0 . 0 0 . 0 '0 . 0 0. 0 ' 0. 0 0 0 '0 . 0 '0. 0 0 . 0 0. 3 '0 . P 1 . 4 '1 . 8 '2 . 2 '2. 1 '1 . 6 '1 . 1 '0 . 5 '0. 1 '0 . 0 '0 0 0 . 0 '0. 0 0 C 0 . 0 '0. 2 c. 1 . 2 '1 . 6 ' 2.. .. e . 3 1 . 8 1. 7 '1 . 7 '1 . 7 2 . 0 2 . 3 ELECTRICAL NEW 26 UNIT SITE PLAN GRO UP Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture En gin ee ring Boarman Kroo s Vogel Gro up Inc. 222 North Second Street Minn eapolis, MN 55401 Telepho ne: 612.3 39.3752 F ac s i m i l e: 611339.6212 www.bkvgroup.c om E OE DOMINIUM ISS NCE evised Site Plan Submittal 07-15-2014 PROJECT TITLE Medina Townhomes KEY PLAN NORTH ARROW CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan. spedfication or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Lic ensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota . Mark H. Bradby 44226 License Number 0425/14 Date REVISION DATE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSI ON NO. SHEET TITLE 04-25.14 Ch ecker 1393.73 ELECTRICAL NEW 26 UNIT SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER E011 © 2013 BKV Group. Inc. EOE DOMINIUM PUD — General Plan Narrative Dear Dusty, This narrative for the PUD General Plan application serves as supporting documentation for the City of Medina's Planning Commission and City Council. Project Description The proposed project is located on a 3.90 acre site located at 510 Clydesdale Trail, directly north of the Medina Entertainment Center in Medina Minnesota: The plan includes 32 affordable town home units and a 1.400 square foot clubhouse. playground, parking for 19 guests, sidewalk connections and preserved green space. The unit mix and expected tenant population: 2 fully accessible 2 bedroom units - 3 two bedroom units 20 three bedroom units - 7 four bedroom units The expected resident population of 130 residents is calculated using the following guidelines: Two bedroom units are expected to have 3 residents. - Three bedroom units are expected to have 4 residents. Four bedroom units are expected to have 5 residents. DOMINIUM_: PUD — General Plan Narrative The project is designed to meet mandatory standards of the Green Communities Criteria, and the Energy Star Certified Homes, Version 3, County -Level Reference Design for Climate Zone 6. The development will be owned and operated as rental property by Dominium. Their intention is to provide all property management, maintaining the quality of the project buildings and grounds and the quality of the tenants. Application for Rezoning The project team is requesting a rezoning from its current Mixed Use Zoning (MU) to a Planned Unit Development District (PUD). Reasoning for Rezoning Request This project will be entirely residential in nature and does not qualify as a mixed use development. In order to comply with certain aspect of the Green Communities Requirements for site density we need to rezone the property to a PUD in lieu of an R4 to reduce the required spacing between building end walls and intemal site setbacks from the private street. By rezoning to a PUD we avoid a series of variances that would be required for an R4 use. The project responds to the following subdivisions of Section 827.25 of the City Zoning Ordinance: Subd. 1. Conservation and more efficient use of land Subd. 3. Preservation of existing natural planting area along the north edge of the site Subd. 5. The grouping of the units on the site allows for higher density, avoidance of existing wetland buffers, maintaining a landscape buffer between the development and Clydesdale Trail and connections to pedestrian sidewalks that connect the development to the community Subd. 7. With the higher density we are able to comply with the Green Communities Criteria for density, utilizing a more efficient layout of utilities and thereby lowering development costs of the project. The development as submitted will otherwise comply with the design requirements of Section 841.4 Design and Development Standards for Mid -Density, Multiple Family Residential Districts the Medina Zoning Ordinance. 2905 Northwest Blvd, Suite 150 • Plymouth. MN 55441-2644 • Corporate 763-354-5500 • Fax 7763154-5519 • Web domiuiumapartmeuts.com 49 DOMINIUM.. PUD — General Plan Narrative Legal Description Please see attached Exhibit A. Solid Waste Disposal Procedures Dominium Management Services, LLC ("DMS`') will implement a solid waste disposal management policy that is similar to the one held at Albertville Townhomes, in Albertville, MN; a similar development that DMS currently operates. This policy will comply with all City of Medina and Hennepin County rules and regulations. Currently. there are no issues with the solid waste disposal at Albertville Townhomes and we foresee no problems at the proposed Medina Townhomes development. Issues Addressed After Concept Plan Application Comment: Extend driveway lengths. Action: Given the dynamics of this site and the area we have to work with, extending all driveways past 22 feet is infeasible. However, the easternmost building next to the pump house can easily be moved back 2 feet to accommodate a longer driveway. We have extended the driveways for this building to 24 feet and we will direct residents with larger trucks/vans to these particular units. Comment: Guest parking. Action: Two additional stalls were added at the northeast corner of the private drive. This brings the total guest parking stalls to 19. The Senior Vice President of Property Management at Dominican Management Services, Jean Ferguson, believes 19 will be sufficient when taking into account her experience at Albertville Townhomes. Comment: Architectural features for trash and recycling containers. Action: DMS will instead implement a management policy that will require residents to store trash and recycling receptacles in their respective garages. This is a similar policy that has been implemented at Albertville Townhomes and has succeeded in minimizing this concern. We believe this will be a better way of managing this issue than implementing an architectural solution. Comment: Downspout locations, directly flows on to driveways. Action: This design is currently used at Albertville Townhomes and appears to have no issues with icing and storm water runoff control or quality. In addition, all storm water runoff from these downspouts will be treated through a rain garden filtration system and another treatment system located in the storm water reservoir, to be used for irrigation, before entering the City's stone sewer system. 2905 Northwest Ble=d. Suite 150 • Plymouth. MN 55441-_2644 • Corporate 763.354-5500 • Fax 763,354-5519 • Web domiuiamapartments.cont DOMINIUMw PUD — General Plan Narrative Comment: Garage doors in front facade are overwhelming Action: The garage doors have been altered to include small windows to break up the overall appearance of a front facade with too much of the same material. This should break up the garage doors and make the development more appealing. Please refer to Exhibit B for an example photograph. Comment: Strip of land to break up driveways between units. Action: DMS has determined that from a management perspective this is best left unchanged. A separation in the driveways is infeasible from a maintenance standpoint. It will make snow removal substantially more expensive. In addition, whether the break in the asphalt is sod or some other landscaping, it will be impossible to keep it alive in such a narrow space and will become unsightly over time. 2905 Northwest Blvd. Suite 150 • Plymouth. MN 55441-2644 • Corporate 763/354-5500 • Fax 763 354-5519 • Web dominiumapartiueuts.cour V' Land Use Objective 1- Upon adoption of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan, the City will review existing zoning districts for compatibility with the City's Future Land Use Plan and assign zoning that supports the adopted land use, where possible. The Future Land Use Plan was developed to be more generalized than the 2000 Comprehensive Plan and should provide enough flexibility to utilize many of the existing zoning districts. The following districts are expected to remain largely intact: " Rural Residential zoning districts (RR, RR2, RR-UR, RR1) are expected to remain consistent with the current zoning ordinance and map, with some exceptions. The primary area that will be changed is the RR-UR (Urban Reserve) area north of Trunk Highway 55 (TH 55), which area will require zoning to support urbanization according to the Future Land Use Plan. " Suburban Residential, Urban Residential, and Multi -Family Residential zoning districts will be reviewed and additional levels of designation added to support the Future Land Use Plan, which identifies three classifications of urban residential: Low, Medium and High. Current zoning designations will be updated to support the density ranges adopted by this Comprehensive Plan. " Business Park zoning designation will support the Future Land Use Plan which has re - guided land along the TH 55 corridor for increased mixed -use and residential uses. Further distinction between Commercial, Business Park and a potential Neighborhood Commercial designation will be reviewed along TH 55 because critical city infrastructure influences development throughout the community. " Uptown Hamel zoning district designation will be reviewed to accommodate mixed - uses within the district. If the Uptown Hamel district does not develop as presently planned, it will need to be eliminated and revised to address the Mixed -Use Business designation adopted in the Future Land Use Plan. " All zoning districts will be reviewed to ensure consistency of each district with the Future Land Use Plan and for compliance with the goals and aspirations of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan. V' Land Use Objective 2 - Revise the zoning ordinance to add new districts or modify definitions as required, after completion of Land Use Objective No. 1 listed herein. Adoption of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan will require the creation of zoning districts that are not currently in the City's zoning ordinance including the following: " Mixed -Use land use designations are designed to allow greater flexibility to both the City and a developer to respond to market conditions while still maintaining a balanced land use pattern. The development of mixed -use zoning will need to include a minimum of two districts to address vertically integrated mixed use (Mixed -Use Business), where residential space is above the commercial space, and lateral mixed use (Mixed -Use) where commercial and residential building exist together in the zoning district. The Mixed -Use land use designation dictates that a minimum of fi ercent of a iven ro er will include a residential com onent, whereas as well as increased density. Mixed - Use Business designation is focused around Uptown Hamel and may be able to utilize the Uptown Hamel zoning designation. Section 7 - Implementation Adopted November 17, 2009 MEDINA Page 7-2 Developing Post -2030 identifies areas for future urban development in the City that will be provided municipal sewer and water services. This area is primarily concentrated around the City of Loretto and is presently planned for each lot to have five contiguous acres of acceptable soils. The purpose of the Developing Post -2030 designation is to communicate the future planning intentions to the community. Low Density Residential (LDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 2.0 units per acre and 3.49 units per acre which are served or are intended to be served by urban services. The primary use in this area is single-family residential development. The areas designated for low density residential uses are located near to existing low density residential uses, natural resources and provide a transition between higher density residential districts and the permanent rural areas of the community. Medium Density Residential (MDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 3.5 units per acre and 6.99 units per acre that are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The primary uses in this designation will be a mix of housing such as single family residential, twin homes, town homes, and row homes. This designation provides a transition area between the commercial and retail uses along the TH 55 corridor and the single-family uses. High Density Residential (HDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 7.0 units per acre and 30 units per acre that are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The primary uses will include duplexes, triplexes, town homes, apartment buildings and condominiums which should incorporate some open space or an active park. This designation is identified in areas that are generally accessible to transportation corridors and commercial uses. Mixed -Use (MU) provides opportunities for multiple, compatible uses on a single site including a residential component and one or more of the following: general business, commercial, office and public semi-public uses in each case where the primary use is residential. The areas designated with this land use will have residential densities between 3.5 units per acre and 6.99 units per acre over a minimum of half of the developable area. The mixed -use areas are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services in the future. Mixed -Use Business (MU -B) provides opportunities for multiple, compatible uses on one site including two or more of the following: residential, general business, commercial, or office. Residential densities in this designation will be between 7.0 units per acre and 45.0 units per acre across the entire area and may include some vertically integrated uses. The mixed -use business areas will be served by urban services. Commercial (C) provides areas for highway oriented businesses and retail establishments; can include commercial, office and retail uses; is concentrated along the TH 55 corridor and are served or will be served by urban services. General Business (GB) provides opportunities for corporate campus uses including light industrial and retail uses. This designation identifies larger tracts of land that are suitable for office and business park developments and are served or will be served by urban services. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Amended May 17, 2011 (CPA2030-3) G Y C A MEDINA Page 5- 9 V' Land Use Objective 1- Upon adoption of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan, the City will review existing zoning districts for compatibility with the City's Future Land Use Plan and assign zoning that supports the adopted land use, where possible. The Future Land Use Plan was developed to be more generalized than the 2000 Comprehensive Plan and should provide enough flexibility to utilize many of the existing zoning districts. The following districts are expected to remain largely intact: " Rural Residential zoning districts (RR, RR2, RR-UR, RR1) are expected to remain consistent with the current zoning ordinance and map, with some exceptions. The primary area that will be changed is the RR-UR (Urban Reserve) area north of Trunk Highway 55 (TH 55), which area will require zoning to support urbanization according to the Future Land Use Plan. " Suburban Residential, Urban Residential, and Multi -Family Residential zoning districts will be reviewed and additional levels of designation added to support the Future Land Use Plan, which identifies three classifications of urban residential: Low, Medium and High. Current zoning designations will be updated to support the density ranges adopted by this Comprehensive Plan. " Business Park zoning designation will support the Future Land Use Plan which has re - guided land along the TH 55 corridor for increased mixed -use and residential uses. Further distinction between Commercial, Business Park and a potential Neighborhood Commercial designation will be reviewed along TH 55 because critical city infrastructure influences development throughout the community. " Uptown Hamel zoning district designation will be reviewed to accommodate mixed - uses within the district. If the Uptown Hamel district does not develop as presently planned, it will need to be eliminated and revised to address the Mixed -Use Business designation adopted in the Future Land Use Plan. " All zoning districts will be reviewed to ensure consistency of each district with the Future Land Use Plan and for compliance with the goals and aspirations of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan. V' Land Use Objective 2 - Revise the zoning ordinance to add new districts or modify definitions as required, after completion of Land Use Objective No. 1 listed herein. Adoption of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan will require the creation of zoning districts that are not currently in the City's zoning ordinance including the following: " Mixed -Use land use designations are designed to allow greater flexibility to both the City and a developer to respond to market conditions while still maintaining a balanced land use pattern. The development of mixed -use zoning will need to include a minimum of two districts to address vertically integrated mixed use (Mixed -Use Business), where residential space is above the commercial space, and lateral mixed use (Mixed -Use) where commercial and residential building exist together in the zoning district. The Mixed -Use land use designation dictates that a minimum of fifty percent of a given property will include a residential component, whereas the Mixed -Use Business designation assumes a strong business component as well as increased density. Mixed - Use Business designation is focused around Uptown Hamel and may be able to utilize the Uptown Hamel zoning designation. Section 7 - Implementation Adopted November 17, 2009 MEDINA Page 7 - 2 '4 Mixed -Use zoning districts will need to address the following elements: a) Percentage and composition of uses on a particular site; b) Accommodation of mixed -use across an entire development and not on each individual parcel; c) Assemblage by owners and developers of smaller parcels to help create a unified environment; d) Architectural and design standards that are specific to the location and type of mixed -use; and e) Conservation standards to ensure a high quality of life. • Private Recreational (PREC) land use designation identifies areas that are privately held for open space and recreational activities. These areas are important to the overall character of the community, but the City does not hold any conservation rights to preserve them as long-term open space. To encourage owners to maintain these areas for the enjoyment of the community, the PREC land use designation allows for limited residential and business uses. A minimum of two zoning districts supporting this land use will be required: one for urban service areas and one for the rural areas. Other Potential Zoning Modifications This Comprehensive Plan identifies preservation and protection of natural systems as imperative to the long-term sustainability of the community. The City will review the rural residential zoning districts to ensure they are consistent with and refer to the polices in the 2010 Comprehensive Plan. The Open Space Report and preservation of natural resources will support the development of a tool that will allow conservation development throughout the community particularly in areas with high quality natural resources. The Rural Residential districts will need to include references to the conservation tools or techniques ultimately designed by the City. It may be appropriate to review and remove current PUD zoning and to utilize the PUD process as a subdivision process or overlay rather than a zoning tool. This review will take place while updating the overall zoning map, but could require rezoning of the existing residential PUD designations to zoning districts that accommodate present density and neighborhood quality. For example, Wild Meadows could be rezoned to a Suburban Residential zoning district. ❖ Land Use Objective 3 — Ensure development is consistent and compatible with the Future Land Use Plan. The following strategies will ensure that development outside of current growth areas is compatible with future goals for growth: a) Require a ghost plat for subdivisions on parcels 10 acres or greater within the Urban Reserve areas. Overlay plats must show how large unsewered lots could be re - subdivided to accommodate new streets, smaller sewered lots or commercial lots, parks and open space, and the conservation of natural and significant ecological resources. Easements may be required to ensure access to or between adjoining properties; Section 7 - Implementation Adopted November 17, 2009 o MEDINA Page 7 - 3 FAGENDA ITEM: 7 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner DATE: September 4, 2014 MEETING: September 9, 2014 Planning Commission SUBJ: Public Hearing - Charles Cudd De Novo — Woodland Hill Preserve — Prelim/Final Plat, Variance; Rezoning; S of Hackamore, East of CR 116 Review Deadline Complete Application Received: 60 -day Review Deadline: Summary of Request Charles Cudd DeNovo, LLC has requested rezoning and preliminary/final plat approval for the development of property located north of the Reserve of Medina development site. A portion of the site was included in the approved preliminary plat called "Fawn Meadows" that was reviewed by the Planning Commission and Council last year. The applicant has also requested a variance from maximum permitted cul-de-sac length. An aerial of the two parcels included in the concept is at the top of the following page. The two parcels include approximately 7.9 net acres. The upland portion of the western parcel is entirely wooded. The eastern lot is open grass because almost all of the trees, with the exception of those along the perimeter, were removed prior to the City adopting the tree preservation ordinance. The properties include a fair amount of topographical changes, with fairly steep slopes to the north, northeast, and northwest. Additionally, the site side -slopes to a drainage -way located in the middle of the woods. Concept Plan Review The Planning Commission and City Council reviewed a concept plan on this project in July. The applicant submitted two conceptual layouts. One layout showed a looped roadway with homes on each side. The alternative layout would include two cul-de-sacs and preserve a wooded area approximately 2/3 acre in area between the two cul-de-sacs. The applicant requests review of the concept plan to see which layout the City prefers so that full engineering is not conducted on a plan that would not be met with City support. The Planning Commission and City Council both preferred the cul-de-sac concept plan in order to save more trees. The applicant has now requested approval of a plat similar to the cul-de-sac concept plan. Cudd DeNovo — Woodland Hill Preserve Page 1 of 9 September 9, 2014 Prelim/Final Plat; Rezoning Planning Commission Meeting ilr_i- ..1();: k ',r► Rezoning/Comprehensive Plan The applicant has requested to rezone the western parcel from RR-UR (Rural Residential -Urban Reserve) to R-1 (Single Family Residential). The RR-UR zoning district is meant to apply to previously rural property prior to the time it is developed with urban services. The R-1 zoning district is intended to implement the Low Density Residential land use. Both parcels are guided Low Density Residential. The Comprehensive Plan defines LDR as follows: Low Density Residential (LDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 2.0 units per acre and 3.49 units per acre which are served or are intended to be served by urban services. The primary use in this area is single-family residential development. The areas designated for low density residential uses are located near existing low density residential uses, natural resources and provide a transition between higher density residential districts and the permanent rural areas of the community. Cudd DeNovo - Woodland Hill Preserve Page 2 of 9 September 9, 2014 Prelim/Final Plat; Rezoning Planning Commission Meeting Rezoning of the eastern property to R-1 was approved at the time of the Fawn Meadows preliminary plat approval. The City has a great deal of discretion when considering requests for rezoning. Adopting a zoning amendment is a legislative act of the City. According to Section 825.35 of the zoning code: "amendments shall not be issued indiscriminately but shall only be used as a means to reflect changes in the goals and policies of the community as reflected in the Plan or changes in conditions in the City." Staff believes the proposed zoning amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and would recommend approval if the plat is approved. Proposed Plat/Site Layout The plat includes 15 lots and one outlot. Daisy Circle, a street which was platted within the Reserve of Medina subdivision to provide access to the site, is proposed to be extended as a cul- de-sac from the southeast. One of the lots (Lot 15), is proposed to be accessed from a future road extension from the southwest. This lot currently lacks frontage and could not be platted until frontage is provided. As noted above, the proposed cul-de-sac is 850 feet in length, exceeding the maximum length of 750 feet. The applicant has requested a variance to allow greater length, arguing that the cul-de-sac permits the preservation of the woods on the west of the site. As noted above, the property includes 7.9 net acres, which would require a minimum of 16 lots based on the LDR required density of 2-3.5 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan does allow for flexibility in density in order to preserve natural features: "Consider exceptions to or modifications of density restrictions for developments that protect the natural features or exceed other standards of the zoning district" [page 5-14 of the Comp Plan]. The lots proposed are consistent with the R1 zoning district. Lots range from 17,546 square feet to 2.02 acres, although a number of staff's recommended comments would cause adjustments to the lots. Stormwater treatment facilities are proposed at the east and northwest edges of the development. Following is a summary of the requirements of the R1 zoning district: R1 Requirement Proposed Plat Minimum Lot Size 11,000 square feet 17,546 Minimum Lot Width 90 feet 90 feet Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 190 feet Front Yard Setback 25 feet 25 feet Front Yard Setback (garage) 30 feet 30 feet Front Yard Setback (if side load garage) 20 feet 20 feet Side Yard Setback (combined) 25 feet (15 & 10) 15 feet and 10 feet Side Yard (corner) 25 feet N/A Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 30 feet Max. Hardcover 40% 40% Cudd DeNovo — Woodland Hill Preserve Page 3 of 9 Prelim/Final Plat; Rezoning September 9, 2014 Planning Commission Meeting Wetlands/Floodplain There is a large wetland located north of the site. The wetland is identified as a Manage 1 wetland, requiring an average buffer of 30 feet. Structures are required to be setback 15 feet from this buffer. The proposed preliminary plat shows enough area outside of the building pad to accommodate the buffers and setback. Upland buffer plantings and signage will be required. FEMA floodplain maps show a potential 500 -year floodplain over the large wetland on the property. As a result of the steep topography upwards from the wetland, staff does not anticipate any concerns. Staff recommends that the applicant provide additional information to confirm that grading will not impact floodplain storage. Tree Preservation, Buffer Yards and Landscaping As noted above, the western parcel is vacant and entirely wooded. Staff believes that in order to develop the western parcel with 2 units/acre as required by the City's Comprehensive Plan, substantial tree removal is necessary for any site layout. The applicant has stated that they submitted the cul-de-sac alignment in order to reduce grading and to preserve trees. The applicant proposes to preserve the drainage -way and an area to the west and larger area to the northwest of the drainage -way. Despite the preservation of these areas, the development would require removal of approximately half of the trees on the property. The Tree Preservation ordinance requires replacement for trees removed in excess of 20% on the development site this size. In this case, the ordinance would require 2398 inches of replacement trees to be planted. The applicant has requested a waiver from any tree replacement requirements, arguing that they have done all they could to preserve trees. The City's Tree Preservation ordinance states that a waiver may be granted when the applicant has "exhausted all reasonable design options." The City has previously granted a partial waiver of tree replacement requirements for the Woods of Medina preliminary plat. As noted above, staff recognizes that developing the western property at 2 units/acre as required by the City's Comprehensive Plan would require a good deal of tree removal. Developing the western property along with the eastern property (where trees had been previously clear-cut before the City adopted the Tree Preservation ordinance), does allow for additional preservation. In the case of the Woods of Medina, staff and the applicant's engineer prepared an alternate site design with narrower lots (60 -foot wide lots instead of the 90 -foot wide lots required by the R1 zoning district) as a "reasonable design option." The same exercise was completed in this case, and it showed that 28% of the trees would be required to be removed. This would lower the required replacement to 1747 inches. The applicant argues that this analysis disadvantages them for developing the two properties together. If a developer were to request development of just the western property at 2 units/acre, all "reasonable design options" would still lead to more removal than they propose. Staff concurs that this would be the case. The Planning Commission and City Council should discuss if this fact justifies a larger waiver than the more conservative analysis. Cudd DeNovo — Woodland Hill Preserve Page 4 of 9 September 9, 2014 Prelim/Final Plat; Rezoning Planning Commission Meeting If the Planning Commission and Council support a waiver, staff would recommend a number of conditions to ensure the preservation of the remaining trees. Staff would recommend that the preservation area west of the swale and in the northwest corner of the site be placed in an outlot rather than on privately owned lot. Staff would also recommend covenants recorded against these areas to preserve the trees. The City's zoning ordinance requires that 2 front yard trees be planted per single family lot. These will be required at time of building permit. Traffic/Streets The site is proposed to be accessed through Daisy Circle, which is stubbed on the east and west ends of the properties from the Reserve of Medina project. The ghost plat of the Reserve had shown the street looping through these properties. As has been discussed throughout this report, the applicant seeks the cul-de-sac design to preserve trees. Daisy Circle (west) is aligned to be located on property to the west of this site. The application does not include this property, so Lot 15 lacks frontage on a public or private street. As such, the lot could not be platted and constructed until Daisy Circle (west) would be platted and constructed to provide access and frontage. The applicant is discussing the potential of purchasing property from adjacent owners to provide frontage. If they are successful before the City Council approves the final plat, staff believes such an adjustment could be made. If no such arrangement is found, Lot 15 would be required to be platted as an outlot until such time as frontage is provided. Lot 15 will ultimately be benefitted by the construction of a cul-de-sac on the end of Daisy Circle (west). Staff recommends a condition requiring the applicant to contribute financially to such construction. Staff believes that 1/5 of the expected cost would be reasonable based upon the development potential of surrounding properties. The subdivision ordinance limits cul-de-sacs to 750 feet in length. The proposed cul-de-sac is approximately 850 feet in length. The applicant has submitted a narrative describing their justification for the variance. A variance from the subdivision ordinance is a different standard than a zoning ordinance commonly reviewed by the City. Those criteria are as follows: "Standards for Variances. The planning commission may recommend and the city council may grant variances from the literal provisions of this ordinance in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Any person requesting a variance may appear at planning commission and city council meetings where such application is considered and provide to the planning commission and the city council such maps, drawings, plans, records and other information necessary to make a determination on the application. It is the responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate that all of the following standards for variance have been met: (a) Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the specific parcels of land involved, a particular hardship to the owner would result if the strict letter of this ordinance were carried out. (b) The conditions upon which the application for the variance is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and are not common to other properties within the City. (c) The hardship is related to the requirements of these regulations and has not been created by any persons presently or formerly having an interest in the parcel of land. Cudd DeNovo — Woodland Hill Preserve Page 5 of 9 September 9, 2014 Prelim/Final Plat; Rezoning Planning Commission Meeting (d) The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel of land is located." The impact of the development on the broader transportation system was contemplated in the County Road 116/Hackamore Road study conducted at the time of the Reserve of Medina. Sewer/Water The applicant proposes to extend a watermain through the site by boring it through the tree preservation area, and loop to existing connections on each side of the development. The sewer for the 14 lots on the cul-de-sac is proposed to run between lots 4 and 5 to connect with the sewer line along the wetland which was installed with the Reserve of Medina project. The sewer for lot 15 is proposed to flow to the system in the Reserve of Medina. This would require a lift pump because the existing sewer line lacks sufficient depth. As an alternative, the sewer from this property could flow north to the main line along the wetland. This would require tree removal. Lot 15 could also conceivable be connected to the sewer line serving future development to the west, which presumably would flow to the north and would be deeper. This would result in the lift pump being a temporary matter. Staff believes the sewer alignment in the plan could also be updated to reduce the number of manholes. Stormwater/LID Review/Grading Review The applicant proposes filtration basins on the southeast and northwest portion of the site. These improvements are required to meet City standards, and the City Engineer has provided comments. The City also commonly requires that stormwater features be included in an outlot. Because of the existing slopes on the property, grading and retaining walls are proposed to allow construction of the street at acceptable grades as well as building pads. The City Engineer has provided comments on the grading plan as well. The City Engineer and Public Works staff recommend that a plan be provided for sump -pump and foundation draintile run off. Park Dedication/Pedestrian Circulation The buildable area of the site for the purposes of park dedication is approximately 8.93 acres. The City's subdivision regulations requires up to 10% of the buildable property to be dedicated for park purposes, or 0.893 acres. The City may also choose to accept cash in -lieu of all or a portion of this land dedication in an amount equal to 8% of the pre -developed market value. Staff approximates this around $100,000, but a precise number will be provided to the Park Commission for review. No park or trail improvements in the area are identified on the parks and trails plan. At the time of Concept Plan Review, the Park Commission had recommended that a small portion of the site be dedicated for park purposes. The Park Commission will review and provide a Cudd DeNovo — Woodland Hill Preserve Page 6 of 9 September 9, 2014 Prelim/Final Plat; Rezoning Planning Commission Meeting recommendation to the City Council. The City required cash -in -lieu of land dedication during the review of Fawn Meadows. The applicant proposes a sidewalk on one side of the street, which would connect with the sidewalks in the Reserve of Medina. Review Criteria/City Discretion As mentioned early in this staff report, the application includes three separate requests: rezoning, variance for the cul-de-sac length, and preliminary/final plat. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission and City Council review the requests in that order. In effect, the plat is subject to approval of the rezoning (because the lots are designed consistent with the requested R1 zoning district) and the variance (because a cul-de-sac of this length cannot be approved without the variance). The City has a good deal of discretion in reviewing rezoning requests. A rezoning may be approved if it meets the policies and objectives of the City. As noted earlier in the report, staff believes that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comp Plan and with policies. The City also has a good deal of discretion in reviewing variance requests. The variance may be granted if the criteria discussed earlier in this report are met. With regards to the preliminary/final plat, the City has less discretion. The City's subdivision regulations state that the City Council shall deny approval of a plat based on one or a combination of the following findings: (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city, or that the proposed subdivision is premature, as defined in Section 820.28. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. The City has a relatively low amount of discretion in reviewing a preliminary plat. If the City does not make the findings above, and the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, City ordinances, and other City policies, the preliminary plat should be approved. If the Planning Commission and City Council approve the rezoning and variance, staff does not believe the findings for denial of a plat would be met. If the Planning Commission and City Council find the various requests meet the relevant criteria, staff would recommend approval subject to the following conditions: Cudd DeNovo — Woodland Hill Preserve Page 7 of 9 September 9, 2014 Prelim/Final Plat; Rezoning Planning Commission Meeting 1) Approval of this plat shall be contingent upon the adoption of an ordinance rezoning the western parcel to R1 - Single Family Residential. 2) The applicant shall enter into a development agreement satisfactory to the City which shall include the requirements described below as well as other relevant requirements of City ordinance or policy. 3) The applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans received by the City on September 5, 2014, July 16, 2014 and any additional improvements required herein. The design of all improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing construction. 4) The applicant shall provide a letter of credit prior to any site construction in an amount recommended by the City Engineer to ensure completion of the required improvements. 5) The applicant shall provide additional information requested by the City Engineer to confirm that flood storage of the large wetland to the northwest is not significantly reduced. 6) The applicant shall meet park dedication requirements as determined by the City Council following recommendation from the Park Commission. 7) The applicant shall submit upland buffer planting and signage plan consistent with City regulations. 8) A partial tree replacement waiver is hereby granted from the full replacement required by code. The applicant shall provide replacement trees for removal in excess of 28%. Such replacement may include off -site planting and financial contributions to the environmental fund. 9) No lawn or landscape irrigation systems shall be permitted to be connected to the City water system. The applicant shall provide details of alternative irrigation measures prior to final plat approval. 10) One side of streets shall be posted "No Parking" to allow adequate emergency vehicle circulation. 11) The plat shall be updated so that Lot 15 is platted as an outlot until such time as the lot has frontage on a public or private street. 12) The plat shall be updated so that stormwater treatment facilities, wetlands, and tree preservations areas are included in outlots. 13) The applicant shall supply financial contribution towards the construction of a cul-de-sac which will provide access to Lot 15. 14) Street names shall be updated as recommended by City staff for review by the City Council at the time of final plat. 15) The applicant shall update the sewer main alignment to reduce the number of proposed manholes, to be approved by City staff. 16) A system for the discharge of sump pump water shall be installed, the design of which shall be approved by the Public Works Director. 17) Construction access and haul routes shall be County Road 116 to Lilium Trail to Daisy Circle. The applicant shall contribute to the cost of repairs to the streets within the Reserve of Medina based upon the recommendation of the City Engineer. 18) All comments of the City Engineer dated July 24, 2014 shall be addressed, and construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to construction. 19) All comments of the City Attorney shall be addressed, and the applicant shall abide by the City Attorney's recommendations related to title issues and recording procedures. 20) The applicant shall record Homeowner's Association (the "HOA") documents against all residential lots which shall be satisfactory to the City. This document shall describe Cudd DeNovo — Woodland Hill Preserve Page 8 of 9 September 9, 2014 Prelim/Final Plat; Rezoning Planning Commission Meeting responsibilities for maintenance of stormwater improvements, upland buffers, and lawn irrigation systems and language related to tree preservation covenants within outlots. 21) The applicant shall obtain necessary approvals and permits form the Elm Creek Watershed, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Department of Health and other relevant agencies. 22) The applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the plat, construction plans, development agreements, and other relevant documents. Attachments 1. Engineering Comments — July 24, 2014 2. Fire Marshal Comments — July 21, 2014 3. Arborist Comments 4. Narrative 5. Variance Narrative 6. Plans Cudd DeNovo — Woodland Hill Preserve Page 9 of 9 September 9, 2014 Prelim/Final Plat; Rezoning Planning Commission Meeting WSB & .ass engineering• planning• environmental. construction July 24, 2014 Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: City Project: Woodland Hill Preserve Preliminary and Final Plat WSB Project No. 02712-080 Dear Dusty: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55'/16 Tel: 763-5'/7-'/800 Fax: 763-5'17-7700 We have reviewed the final plat submittal for the Woodland Hill Preserve site. The plan expands the previously approved preliminary plat for Fawn Meadows and adds the property immediately to the west. The plans propose to construct improvements to serve 15 single family homes. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters. 1. The westerly side yard drainage and utility easement on Lot 15 should be 10 -feet. 2. The northerly drainage and utility easement on Lot 15 should be moved southerly to include the wetland boundary. 3. Evidence of an appropriate driveway easement to serve Lot 15 should be provided. 4. Retaining walls are proposed across drainage and utility easements. The plans should be revised to eliminate retaining walls in drainage and utility easements. 5. Sheet C301 should show trees to be removed. 6. Lots 7 — 11 are proposed to be custom graded. This concept has the potential to create drainage issues. We recommend these sites be included in the overall grading plan and not be custom graded. At a minimum we recommend a concept grading plan for these lots be provided in future submittals. 7. The retaining wall shown on Lot 8 will require extensive grading. The necessary grading to construct this wall should be shown on the proposed grading plan. 8. The existing sanitary sewer and associated easement should be shown on Sheet C301. Woodland Hill Preserve Preliminary and Final Plat July 24, 2014 Page 2 9. Many of the proposed retaining walls exceed 4 -feet in height and will require an engineered design. 10. We recommend that all walls exceeding 4 -feet in height include some type of safety barrier on the top of the wall. 11. All existing contours should be labeled. 12. Proposed driveway grades should be shown on Sheet C301. 13. The proposed swale across Lots 10 and 11 should be protected by an easement. The grading plan should show the proposed grading necessary to construct this swale. 14. The plans should identify the proposed construction access (existing easement or through the roads in the Reserve subdivision). 15. We recommend the sanitary sewer service inverts at the lot lines be 4 -feet below the proposed low floor elevations. The plans currently show the service inverts at 3 -feet below the low floor elevations for Lots 1 — 14. 16. The plans should clarify the proposed sanitary sewer service to Lot 15. The plans show the proposed invert at SANMH #107 as 1003.75 and the upstream service invert to serve Lot 15 as 1001.0. This does not make sense and the plans should be corrected. Also, the proposed low floor elevation for Lot 15 is shown as 1004.0 which would require a sanitary sewer invert elevation of 1000.0 to properly serve this home by gravity. The plans should clarify what is being proposed. 17. The plans should be revised so that no sanitary sewer services discharge directly into a manhole. 18. The pipe grade for the proposed sanitary sewer downstream from SANMH #107 should be revised to the minimum allowable grade of 0.40%. 19. Stormwater review comments are attached. Please contact me at 612-209-5113 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. —1°7-4 6r#45—. Tom Kellogg Attachment WSB Infrastructure ■ Engineering a Planning ■ Construction & A.ssociores. /In% Memorandum To: Tom Kellogg, P.E., City Engineer City of Medina From: Earth Evans, P.E. Water Resources Project Manager WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: 7.23.14 Re: Woodland Hill Preserve Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan Review City Project No. LR-14-140 WSB Project No. 2712-08 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541-4800 Fax: 763 541-1700 We have completed a preliminary review of the stormwater management plan for Woodland Hills Preserve development. The site was previously reviewed (as Fawn Meadows) on 11.19.14. The site is located south of Hackamore Road, east of Pinto Drive/County Road 116. Documents provided for review include the following: • Stormwater Management Plan prepared by EVS, including Hydrocad dated 7.17.14 • Existing and Proposed Drainage Maps These plans were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina's Stormwater Design Manual and general engineering practices for stormwater management. Based on this review, we offer the following comments: 1. Storm sewer sizing calculations should be provided in future submittals. 2. Documentation showing NPDES permit coverage must be provided to the City prior to start of construction. 3. An Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission permit must be obtained by the applicant for the proposed development. 4. A Department of Natural Resources (DNR) public waters work permit will be required for any work below the ordinary high water level (OHW) of the existing wetland on the north side of the site. 5. The DNR wetland outlet is a 24 -inch pipe under Hackamore Road at elevation 981.4 and the OHW elevation is 983.5. The existing groundwater elevation is likely 982+/-. The proposed infiltration basins adequately address the potential for encroachment into the Woodland Hills Preserve Stormwater Management Review City of Medina Page 2 of 2 groundwater by incorporating a capped draintile. The draintile as at elevation 985.0 which provides 3' of separation to the estimated groundwater elevation. 6. The project meets the City's requirement for a 20% reduction in phosphorus from existing conditions. 7. The Soil Survey indicates hydrologic soil group (HSG) B soils for the project area. Infiltration is feasible with this soil type. Draintile is shown on the plans, however the draintile is capped. Therefore infiltration will occur unless the cap is removed. We recommend keeping the draintile as shown on the plans due to the proximity to the groundwater table and for ease of maintenance. Additionally, the draintile should remain capped unless drawdown is required for maintenance. The volume provided meets the City's requirement. 8. The outlet pipe for 2P in the Hydrocad model should be adjusted to 984.9 versus 884.9. 9. The modeled infiltration rate should be revised to reflect HSG B soils and the recommended rate from the Minnesota Stormwater Manual (approximately 0.3 in/hr). Please confirm that the 48 hour drawdown time is met with the revised infiltration rate. 10. Outlet control structure details should be provided with future submittals. 11. Maintenance access must be provided to the proposed BMPs. 12. Velocities should be kept to < 6 fps at all outfalls into the proposed BMPs and the DNR wetland. TREE • LANDSCAPING SPECIALISTS 405 Hardman Avenue, South St. Paul, MN 55075 To whom it may concern, On June 9th, 2014, a site visit was made to the Woodland Hill Preserve to determine if preserving a 3/4 acre wooded area in the SE corner of the intersection of CR- 116 and Hackamore Rd. is worth the effort. The area is being currently developed and while most of the trees on site have been or will be removed a few homes may benefit from preserving these trees if they can be worked around. I am of the strong opinion that preserving the wooded area highlighted in the map below is important for conservation. The area is a fairly pure and mature stand of Sugar maple and Basswood trees as classified by the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System and verified in the field. A few Oaks (upland) and Cottonwoods (in the lower area nearer the wetland) are represented on site. The understory, while fairly non- existent, as is common underneath the heavy shade of maple trees, does however have an abundance of maple seedlings (especially along the edges) suggesting the area will remain as a climax forest of maple/basswood. The gains from erosion control, sedimentation capture, and wildlife corridors to name a few are difficult to measure but are undeniable in the grand scheme of things. If the woodland can be preserved by the developer I would endorse it. The lack of invasive species on site is also fairly rare in and of itself which makes preservation easier to justify. If the area is to be mass graded and the street to run all the way through these trees would have to be removed to accommodate the necessary fill and grade changes. Mark Rehder Certified Arborist MN -0256A Woodland Hill Preserve Variance Narrative We are asking the council to grant a variance for the length and radius of the Cul De Sac for Woodland Hill Preserve. The cul de sac length is 853 feet long with a 45 foot roadway radius and accessing a total of 14 homes. The ordinance allows a cul de sac up to 750 feet long with a 50 foot roadway radius and accessing up to 20 homes? (a) Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the specific parcels of land involved, a particular hardship to the owner would result if the strict letter of this ordinance were carried out. The Woodland Hills Preserve neighborhood has been designed with the longer cul de sac because of the unique conditions of the site. One half of the site is heavily wooded and has sloping topography that lends itself to a more natural site design in order to save as many trees as possible and maintain the natural topography and drainage on the site. (b) The conditions upon which the application for the variance is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and are not common to other properties within the City. This is a unique and unusual site because of the high quality of the woods on half of the site. We feel it is in the best interest of the city, our company and the future buyers in the neighborhood as well as the adjoining Toll Bros neighborhood to do our best to maintain the uniqueness and beauty of the natural features on the site. (c) The hardship is related to the requirements of these regulations and has not been created by any persons presently or formerly having an interest in the parcel of land. The hardship that is related to not granting the longer cul de sac design would be to change the site design and run the road through the wooded site and clear cut most of the trees and more dramatically change the natural topography and beauty of the site. (d) The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel of land is located. Extending the cul de sac will not be detrimental to the public welfare due to the fact that there are only 14 homes that will be built on the cul de sac which is under the acceptable number of homes accessed from a cul de sac according to code. In addition, the fact that this site plan maintains much of the natural topography and saves as many trees as possible demonstrates that in no way is this site design injurious to any of the other land in the neighborhood. Rick Denman Charles Cudd + De Novo L.L.C. CO NCEPTUA L EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATION S Cl-tAfz Le_.. CU DO + NJOVC AN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN / BUILD FIRM Rick Denman 612.889.6980 charlescudd .com 2"K FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPM ENT PLANS FOR WOODLA ND HILL PRESERVE Medina, MN Presented By: Charles Cudd Denovo AREA M AP N HACKAMO RE ROAD 7 LAKE M EDINA _l 1__ / SHA WNEE ROA D MEDINA COUNTRY CLUB PRO JECT CONTACT LIST OR UNDER MY DI REC T APPLICANT LANDSCAPING S UP ERVISION AN D TI IA T I AM A M ONEY TREE HO LDINGS LLC EVS, INC. D ULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL CO NTACT JO SEPH CA VANAUGH 10250 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ENGIN EER UN DER THE LAWS OF 3220 NIAGARA LANE RD SUITE 123 THE STA TE OF MINNESO TA. PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 TEL. (612) 805-2015 TEL (952) 646-0236 EMAIL: jcava220igaol.con, FAX: (952) 646-0290 CONTA CT: KATHY O 'CONNELL D avid N ash CIVIL ENGINEER EMAIL koconnell @ev -eng com DA TE 0 71 15/ 2014 EVS, INC. RE GIS TRATI ON N UMBER 21836 10250 VALLEY VIEW ROAD SUITE 123 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 TEL (952)646-0236 FA X: (952) 646-0290 CO NTACT DAVE NASH EMAIL: dnash@evs-eng.com SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION C100 TITLE SHEET BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHIC AND TREE SURVEY C101 DEM OLITION & TREE IDENTIFICATION PLAN C102 EXISTING TREE INVENT ORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN C103 EXISTING TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN C201 FINAL SITE PLAN C202 PRELIMINARY PLAT C301 GRADING & EROSION C ONTROL PLAN C302 GRADING & EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C401 STREET & STORM SEWER PL AN & PROFILES C501 SANITARY SEWER & W ATER MAIN PLAN & PROFILES C502 SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN PLAN & PROFILES C601 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C602 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C603 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS L101 LANDSCAPE PLAN & DETAILS ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS , INC . 10250 Valley Vi ew R oad, S uite 123 Eden Prairie, Minnesot a 55344 Pho ne: 952-646-0238 Fax: 952846-0290 www. evsx ng .c om ` 1 T V o MEDINA City of Medi na, MN 2052 C ou nty Road 24 Medi na, Min nes ot a 55340 Phone: 763-473-4643 F ax: 763-473-9359 www .ei.medina .m n.us FINAL PLAT PR OJ ECT W OODLAND HILL PRESERVE L OCATION MEDINA, MN SH EET TITLE SHEET # DATE R EVISI ON 1 HEREB Y CERTIFY 'TFI AT TIIIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPO RT WAS PREPARE D BY ME LAND SURVEYOR ACRE LAND SUR VEYING, I NC. 9140 BALTIMORE STREET NE, STE 100 BLAINE, MN 55449 TEL (763) 238-6278 DR AWN BY CH ECKED BY VN DJN DATE PROJ ECT # 7.15.2014 2014-008.1 SH EE T NUMBE R C100 BOUNDARY , TOPOGRAPHIC, AND TREE SURVEY ADDRESS: 4612 COUNTY ROAD N O. 116, MEDINA, MN 55340 FOR: CHARLES CUDD DENOVO LEGEND DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES CATCH B ASIN DENOTES GATE VALVE DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR DENOTES SANITARY SEWER DENOTES STORM SEWER , DENOTES EXISTING FENCE 01011.2 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION. . ry v y -y -s . DENOTES TREE LINE ... DENOTES BITUMINOUS NORTH G RAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inc h = 5015. NOTES - 2 fo ot Contou r Interval - Wetlan d line is o pprozima te. - BEARING'S AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE ON ASSUMED DATUM. -SEE EXCEL SHEET FOR TREE INVENTORY Job *14364 0' r — P ROPERTY DESC RIPTION (WEST PARCEL) Per Title Commitment Number: HB-28057 Issued by Custom Home Builders Title, LLC, an agent for Old Republic Nati onal Title Insuranc e Compa ny. The West 409 feet of the East 1059 feet of the South 1/2 of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Sectio n 1, Township 118, R ang e 23 , He nn epin C ounty, Minnes ota . Torrens Property Torre ns C ertific ate N o. 785332. NW CORNER OF SOUTH 1/2 Rim:986. 42 In, 969.4 H --L te a\ _ _ Line A .m . rri PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (E AST PA RCE L) Per Title Commitment Numb er. HB-27730 Sup . N o.2 issued by C ustom H ome Build ers Title, LLC, an age nt f or Old R epublic N ati onal Titl e Insur anc e Comp any. The E ast 650 F eet of th e So uth H alf of the N orthw est Q uart er of th e Northwest Quarter of Secti on 1, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County , Mi nnes ot a. T ogether with an easement 10 feet in width over and across th at part of said South 1/2 lying West of the East 650 feet there of; the center line of which is described as foll ows: Beginning at a point on the West line of s aid South 1/2 distant 375 fe et S outh of the Northwest corner of said South 1/2, thence E asterly of right angl es to s aid West li ne, to a point on the Westerly b oundary of said East 650 feet thereof, and there terminating, as shown in deed Doc. N o. 703618, Hehh epi n Co unty, Mi nnesot a. 1\ 89`43'00"W 1059.01 -46 Droi nage and Utility Easement PER DOC . N0. 5078736 We.'.ona Edge Edge of Weser (De'i.nec:ed by ethers) 7/6/14 Rim:984.55 R m:984 .]9 c 4 — 10 FOOT ROAD EASEMENT 9 46 PER DOC. N0. 703617 AND 1243225 I hereby certify that this plan, survey or repo rt w as prepared by \ me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licen sed \ Land Surveyo r under the lo ws of the State of Minnesota. OSHUA P: SCHNEIDER Date: 07-08-14 Reg. No. 44655 944 509 O 539 53 X 8,41 U* ..x1531 xts sX' 652 .yt1aJ 9,259 x x74 x.0440 X972 9 0 sx \\ xxzxe x15 Xti» X12 390\a . X9 1 j x 80 \ \ °,5 32 x,:741 19X957X 0 xivJ \ Ism , ,5°i, 409.0 / 1059.0 Rim:984.33 — — — / ._ 97}.1 / 2/ 4 wcler 984 \ \ Ina972 15 c Rim 1v9734 I 76 \ /i R m. 985 .95 a„ a x77 x9741 �t]ap 4 .x,170 xtz4t . _ - '_Y 5 x974 • 1 xla.a.•- 01544 . f..... . 01547— x 453 . . .. . X1554\ X1515 I� X,ssz ,0 13 0 0550 x191. X5 \ �s,a f' 0505 °1549 SHED xs n fa1, 998 X 12 X ss9 xtsei .. . \� !t„ 0-o8 n : X1'579 0579 sfo } x ,5,, x012 X13)5 0 1507 X19, X,575 \ , Shoo ,3._ x1224 re9 x _ x,997 a I- ,sse9 ee X, 4141 f 8300; x1:9, -x071 xm 1006 x159,* 92150 X XX'x9e x ,590 X1595 ,594x) X,zo x 0 '004 x,597 x759 I. W O p,zo97 x, xq J2. X ,en 4 1 * 5 I sPe. .. 1 : .14% 229 X129 X M1ie4 X9412 X295 X1235 X95Y X1234 X994 90266 X1219 x,0JS1 244'7 a 9 , x957 9958 1220/ x9541 x1:020 x955■ 02 . y x5a5 9 X0003 949 X95 X 09 0 741,9 i X z,5 '. 7231 x0905 Xx /aI x x ezdx ,e25 x . a to \ X 'V : '1 X,41 041 x,903 Ho12 x, ,7 xt i4. .. X 409\00 )110,1c2.2,1— X,zt 18 u, cxL n-' ,0 4 1 N89"52'55'1W ,1006 .6 11:1013. 8\ Inv 1008. 9 \ C FL:1013.74 009.74 \ i II II — / L { \ V X9441 A r - 16/I — 1022 r.11,1 I 1 I I \ 1 L /I V 1 \ 1059.00 0 650.0 Y G VD Rim:985.34 41, .974 .4 \ e Weta^a S00"00'32' W " 4 i4 \, APe Edge Edg \ \ �$2 R m:985 .72 \ Ina:975.77 IN nA C LAN DE SURVEYING 9140 Baltimore Str eet 1`E - . .. Butt e 100, Blaine, MN 783-238-6278 js.ecrelandsury yeegm all.com I, I, 0 t 1 1 16 1,1 11, n• 1 in it 0 „+ 1. CI\Lun d Pro tec ts 2008\14364bs —Meae,e\deg\14364bsd.g 7/8/2014 1070 0 PM COT osoj 996333 SEW 1058 \ \7� N89°43'00"W 1059.01 FitAatizeif Mater .�. - Rim:984. 55 '* " Rim: 984.79 6 750 78.151 ,159 6 A '5 1696 14x5.6 SHED .:✓:"'....�-... .. e,s. . 1561 ,568 9 X575,, ,..-�••^-A •• �,� " 1598 Inv:971.1 r � 151 .r; Tl 0 4.592 �r$pp}"^ `411 9' -31t X161 X ?cr6n X"' xa X", r. 6,6p 01597 409.0 b1 409000 —4 . 107, LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE EAST 850.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 1, TO WNSH IP 118, RANGE 23. AND THE WEST 409 FEET OF THE EA ST 1059 FEET OF T HE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST Q UARTER, SECTION 1 T OWN SH IP 118, RANGE 23 TO GETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD WAY PURPO SES OVER THE NORTH 33 FEET OF THE WEST 1,030 FEET OF THE NO RTH 50 RODS OF TH E SOUTH HALF OF TH E N ORT HWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 1, TO WNSHIP 118, RANGE 23, ACCORDING TO THE UN ITED STATES GOV ERNMEN T TH EREOF. TOTAL AREA OF PA RCEL, 16.33 AC LEGEND 0 d 91 �f X269 x=, 88 13 .12 0 d6, H 1059.0 Rim:984.33 .r '1.,... ...---.. 1 . .. 7 4 Ist 3M — / gut '�a;m 'r.: es a.] Inv 7at}S/ ® "?s-xe�'` "'.".. N X2 .6 9. rya x65, x=" y*58 1 X 5319sJ pr 09.9 99.9 8' °52'55'' W i 4'39 X TREE R EMOV AL X �r 1 5/ L it 1 1\ V'^\ i L_ 1 NO TES 335 rs# v4007.4 260 1059:0.56 . •64 650. 0 \ Rim:985.34 974.4 1. PROPERTY AND TREE SURVEY PERFORMED BY OEMARS-GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. DATED 2/17/08 REV . 2/1/08. And ACRE LAND SURVEYING DATE 72014 2. TOPOGRA PHIC CONTOURS BY ACRE LAND SURVEYING. 3. THE TREES AND OTHER NATURAL VEGETATION WITHIN THE P ROJECT AND/ OR ADJACENT TO THE PRO JECT ARE OF PRIME CONCERN TO THE CONTRACT ORS OP ER ATIONS AN D SHA LL BE A RESTRICTED AREA. HE WILL BE RE QUIRED TO PROTECT THE T REES WHICH ARE TO BE SAVE D TO BE SURE THAT THE EQUIPMENT IS NOT NEEDLESSLY OPERATED UNDER NEARBY TREES AND SHALL EXERCISE EXT REME CAUTION IN W ORKING ADJACENT TO TREES . SH OULD ANY PORTION OF THE TREE BRANCHES RE QUIRE RE MOVAL TO PERMIT OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTORS EQUIPME NT, HE SHALL OBTAIN THE SERVICES OF A PROFESSIONAL TREE TRI MMING SERVICE TO TRI M THE TREES PRI OR TO THE BEGINNING OF OPERATION. SHOULD THE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS RESULT IN THE BREAKING OF ANY LIMBS, THE BROKEN LIMBS SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND CUTS SHALL BE PROPERLY PROTECTED TO MINI MIZE ANY LASTING DAMAGE TO THE TREE. NO TREES SHALL BE REMOVED WITH OUT AUTHORI ZA TI ON BY THE E NGINEER AN D APPROVED BY THE CITY. COSTS FOR TRIMMING SER VICES SHALL BE C ONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION AND NO SPECIAL PAYMENT WILL BE MADE. 4. CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT 811 FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS - 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION\CON ST RUCTIO N, >- T Rim:985.72 .�.d °yR im:987 .✓' ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC . 10250 Valley View R oad, S uite 123 Eden Prairi e, Mi nn es ota 55344 Ph one: 952.618.0236 Fa x: 952448-0290 www . v a.en9.wm Gt 1 Y 0x ! MEDINA City of Medi na, MN 2052 County Road 24 Medina, Minnesot a 55340 Pho ne: 783.473.4643 Fax: 783734359 www.G.m edl na.m n.un FINAL PLAT P ROJ EC T W OODLAND HILL PRESERVE L OC ATION MEDIN A, MN SH EE T EXISTING CONDITIONS, REMOV ALS, AN D TREE INDENTIFIC ATI ON # D ATE RE VISION I HERE BY CER TIF Y TH AT THIS PLAN, SPE CI FICA TION, OR R EP OR T W AS PREP AR ED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPER VISION AN D THAT I AM A DULY LICENS ED PR OF ESSIONAL EN GINEER UNDE R THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. D avid N ash DATE 07/ 15/ 2014 REGIS TRA TI ON NUMB ER 21838 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY VN DJN DAT E PROJ ECT # 7.15 .2014 2014-008.1 SHEET N UMB ER 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET C 1 01 Tag 8 Type Trees Caliper (lm.) Tr ee s Caliper Removal 215 Oak 28 216 Oak 22 22 217 Basswood 30 218 Oak 18 219 Maple 14 14 220 0* 10 10 221 Oak 22 22 222 Maple 10 10 223 Oak '6 16 224 Bas swood 16 16 225 Maple 10 10 226 Oak 24 24 227 Maple 8 8 228 M4epe 10 10 229 Mass 22 22 229a ladle 22 22 230 Maps 16 16 231 Ma ple 10 10 232 fade 10 10 233 Basswood 18 16 234 lade 12 12 235 Oak 20 20 236 Maple 16 16 237 Maple 22 22 238 Oak 24 34 239 Maps 15 15 239a M ade 15 15 240 M aple 14 14 241 M aple B a 242 Maple B 8 243 M aple '4 14 244 M ade /6 18 245 Bassw ood 18 18 246 ladle 10 10 247 Ma ple 16 16 248 Basswood 12 12 249 Maple 18 18 250 O ak 30 33 251 0* 25 25 252 Maple 15 15 253 Maple 12 12 254 Ma de 12 12 255 Oak 24 24 256 Oak 24 24 257 O ak 27 258 0* 24 259 Basswood 24 260 Elm 8 Tap 6 Type Trees Carper (in.) Trees Caliper Remo val 445 M aple 8 off sae 445 Basswood 14 o6 sae 448a Basswood 12 o6 sae 4466 Ba sswood 8 00 see 447 Basswood 12 Oslo 448 Maple 22 off eke 449 Mille 12 df.9. 450 Maple 20 df she 451 Basswood 8 04 sae 452 Maple 14 art sips 453 Basswood 24 oases 4536 Ba sswoo d 24 se sae 454 Maple 18 df ale Tag 6 Type Tress Carper (St)Trees Calper Removal 261 0* 28 262 0* 18 263 0* 22 264 Oak 22 265 Maple 10 286 Basswood 18 2666 Basswood 18 Nab Basswood 14 267 Maple 10 288 Oak 20 269 Made 12 270 ah 12 271 Maple 10 272 Basswood 18 2728 Basswood 24 273 Maple 10 274 Maple 16 16 275 Maple 14 276 Maple 14 277 beadle 10 278 Maple 14 279 Maple 18 280 Mille 12 261 Maple 10 282 Basswood 18 283 ladle 8 264 Maple 32 285 Mie le 6 286 Basswood 36 287 Maple 14 288 Mile 14 289 Maple 8 290 Maple 16 291 a sh 10 292 Eon 12 293 B asswood 20 294 Maple 12 295 ah 24 296 Maple 14 297 Maple 8 298 Maple 10 299 Maple 12 300 Made 16 301 Maple 12 302 Maple 16 303 Maple 8 304 M aple 18 305 Map le 18 306 M aple 12 307.._ l ._ _ 16 Tap* Type Trees Caliper (in .) Tr ees Calbar Removal 308 Mapls 18 309 Map le 16 310 Maple 15 311 Ask 14 311a P6h 12 311b Ask 12 312 Pah 12 313 Ash 8 314 MA 12 315 M aple 16 316 M aps 22 311 Maple 14 316 Wade 14 319 Made 12 320 Made 16 321 Ea 24 322 0* 20 323 Basswood 18 324 Oak 28 325 Oak 24 326 0* 16 327 lads 8 328 0* 24 329 one 24 330 M aple 10 331 Basswood 10 3311 Basswood 14 3316 Basswood 40 332 0as 28 333 ah 28 334 Map le 16 335 Eta 14 336 M aple 8 337 PM 10 334 0* 30 339 Ek e 14 340 Oak 18 341 Oak 18 342 0* 33 343 Oak 20 344 Maple 8 345 Oak 12 346 Oak 33 347 Oak 28 348 Map le 12 349 0* 34 34 350 M ade 8 a 351 Maple 10 10 352 Maple 6 353__ M ode 12 12 Tap 8 Type Trees Caliper (M .) Trees Carper Removal 354 Maple 8 355 Maple 10 10 356 0* 24 357 Oak 30 30 358 Basswood 10 356. Basswood 10 3560 B asswood 16 3580 Basswood 16 356d Basswood 16 356e Bass wood 16 359 0* 46 4e 360 Mapl e 14 381 Made 8 a 362 Made 12 12 383 Elm 12 364 Oak 48 385 Male 12 388 0* 44 367 Maple 8 8 388 0* 22 369 Ma ps 20 370 Elm 8 371 Basswood 24 372 Mille 18 373 Maple 10 10 374 Maras 18 1a 375 Mil le 10 376 Maple 10 10 377 M esa 10 10 378 M aple 12 12 379 Ma ple 12 12 380 Maple 12 12 381 Map le 12 12 382 Ash 12 383 Maple 8 384 Ash 14 385 Maple 8 386 M aple 20 387 Maple 8 3876 Maple 10 388 Maple 12 12 389 Maple 16 16 390 WPM 14 14 391 Maple 36 392 154p1. a 8 393 Mile 8 8 394 Maple 12 12 395 BM 14 396 Maple 14 14 397 Maple 14 14 Tap 6 Type Trees Carper (ln.) Trap Caliper Removal 396 Ms le 8 8 399 Maple 20 20 400 Male 0 e 401 Map le 35 35 402 Pall 12 12 403 Maple 8 8 404 Maple 12 405 M ph 12 12 406 Maple 12 12 407 Maple 16 406 M ap le a a 409 B0 1 Elder 12 410 Basswood 12 410a Bass wood 24 411 Maple 12 412 Maple 12 12 413 Maple 8 414 ►k yle 16 16 415 Map le 14 416 Maps 24 24 418 Maple 30 30 419 Elm 8 419a Elm 8 420 Maple 12 12 421 a sh 14 14 422 Mk 10 10 423 M ope 35 35 424 Mille 35 35 425 Bass wood 24 24 426 Maple 10 10 427 M ap le 10 10 426 Maple 20 20 429 Laski 0 0 430 Maple 15 15 4304 Maple 24 24 431 Basswood 15 15 431a Basswood 24 24 432 0* 18 18 433 Maple 3 8 434 0* 12 off sip. 435 Oak 18 off site 438 Made 8 8 437 Elm 20 o8 site 438 Map le 46 439 M aple 16 011 she 440 Maple 12 441 Maple 10 o066. 442 Basswood 28 o8 site 443 Ash 28 off site 444 Ash 28 off site TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERV ATI ON TOTALS TOTAL EXISTING TREES SURVEYED 8569" TREES OFF -SITE 354" TOTAL TREES ON -SITE 8215" TREES SAVED — ON -SITE ONLY: = 4168" TREES REMOVED -- ON -SITE ONLY: 4047" %RE MOVAL 49 % ALLOWED PER CITY CODE 20 % = 1643" REQUIRED REPLACEMENT PER CODE 2398" 'TREE REPLACEMENT W AIVER REQUESTED PROPERTY AND TREE SURVEY PE RFORMED BY DE MARS-GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. , DATED 2/17/06 AND BY ACRE LAND SURVEY, INC., DATED 07/08/14 ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRON MENTAL PLANNING E VS, INC. 10250 Valley New Road, S uit e 123 Ed en Pr airl ., Mi nnesot a 5 5344 Phon e: 952446-0236 F ax: 952446-0290 www.evs-en9 .com MEDINA CBy of Medina, MN 2052 County Road 24 Medina, Mi nnesot a 55340 Phew: 763-473-4643 Fu: 76373-9350 www .cl.m edl na.m n.u. FINAL PLAT P ROJEC T WOODLAND HILL PRESERVE LOC ATION MEDINA, MN SHE ET TREE INVENTORY & PRESERVATION PLAN # D ATE REVISI ON 1 H EREBY C ERTIFY THA T THIS PLAN, SPECIFI CATION, OR R EPORT WAS PREPA RED BY ME OR UNDER MY DI RECT SUPERVISI ON AND THA T I AM A D ULY LICENSED PROFESSI ONAL EN GINEER UN DER THE LAWS OF TH E S TA TE OF MINNESOTA. David Nash DAT E 07/ 15/ 2014 REGIST RATI ON NUMBE R 21836 D RAWN BY CH ECKED BY VN DJN D ATE P ROJ ECT # 7.15.2014 2014-008 .1 SH EET NUMBE R C102 It/ / AL 1L Draina ge an d Utllty Easement PER DOC N0. 50 8736 �11I « �^ listsr— • ••• ••7 4 � — — -. —. —..r. — ARAB T \ 703617 AND 12 ?esz, 1E193 0S0 BLOCK 1 1 LOT NU MBER 10' SIDE YARD SETBA CK 125' MIN. DEPTH SUGGESTED G ARAGE LOCATION G ARAGE ELEV. IF STEPS REQ UIRED FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION — ROW LINE 15 1004 90' MIN. LOT WDTH SANITARY SERVICE SHALL BE SET DOWNSTREAM OF WATER SERVICE ACCORDING TO DIRECTIO N OF SANITARY M AINLINE FLOW 1 30' R EAR YARD SETBACK(TYP.) 15' SIDE YARD SETBACK GROUND ELEVATION LOWEST FLO OR ELEVATION STRUCTURE TYPE (SEE BELOW) BUILDING PAD NO. OF STEPS (IF REQUIRED) GRADE AT FRONT OF HOUSE 25' FRO NT YARD SETBACK (30' FO R GARAG ES) • 0 n' 'O7J I I I 56. 1000 SWO BLOCK 1 L r— i r H ; F: - 11 / L - R - RAM BLER. GRADED FOR a DIFFERENCE FROA THE BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRO NT GRADE ELEVATION AT GARAGE. LO- FULL BASEM ENT LOOKOUT, SIDE LOOKOUT. GRAD ED FOR 5 6 OF DIFFERENCE FROM TI ME LOO KO UT G RAD E ELEVATION TO FRONT G RADE ELEVA TION AT GARAGE. WV - FULL BASEM ENT WALKOUT, SIDE WALKO UT, GRADED FOR 6 OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE BASEMEN T FLOO R ELEVATION TO FRONT GRADE ELEVATION AT GARAG E. S -SIDE C - CU STO M (I). 1 STEP (0 6) UP FROM GARAG E FLOOR ELEVATION TO FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION. (2). 2 STEPS (1.2) UP FROM GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATIO N TO FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION. NO TES DAISY _CIRCLE SLO LFE„008. 5 r r 1 r I IL- L I 1,1`.; 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ROUNDED TO THE NE AREST TENTH FOO T. 2. ALL DIM ENSIONS ARE BA CK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB UNLESS NO TED OTHERWISE. BACK OF CURB IS SHOWN GRAPHICA LLY O NLY. 3. STREET NAM ES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY, 4 DRAINAGE AND UTIUTY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED, DRAIN AGE AND UTILITY EA SEM ENTS WILL BE PRO VIDED O VER ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES AND UP TO ONE (1) FOOT ABOVE THE HIGH WATER LEVEL OF ALL POND S. WETLAND BUFFER AVERAG ING LO T 8 (IMPA CT): BUFFER WDTH REDUCED TO 21.4 FT BUFFER AREA REDUCED BY 732 FT SF LOT 6 8 7 (M ITIGATION): BUFFER WDTH INCREASED TO 36 .6 FT BUFFER AREA REDUCED BY 733 FT SF WETLAND OHWL-983.6 (MR DATA) JYL XL 4 k. 4\ SINGLE FAMILY SITE DEVELOP MENT SU MMARY \ • \ \ \ \/ \ 2 \ 4, ' \ 4\ II II LOT SUM MARY MINIM UM LOT SIZE MINIM UM LOT WDTH MINIMUM LOT DEPTH MAXIMUM I MPERVIOUS COVERA GE NUMBER OF LOTS SETBACKS FRONT YARD FOR GARAGE DOORS FACING STREET F OR SIDE -LOAD GARAGE SIDE YARD REAR YARD AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER MINIMU M WETLAND BUFFER MINIMUM WETLAND SETBACK 11,000 SF 90 FT 100 FT 40 566 OF T OTAL LOT A RE A 15 UNITS 25 FT 30 FT 20 FT 25 FT TOTAL (MIN 10 FT ON ONE SIDE) 30 FT 30 FT 20 FT 15 FT EXISTING ZONING RURAL RESIDENTIAL (URBAN RESERVE) PROPOSE D ZONING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-1 ,x— LE GEND STREET LIGHT (TBD) 'WETLAND BUFFER " SI GN (12 SHOWN) MONU MENT SI GN ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC. 10025 Valley View Road, S uit e 140 Eden Prairi e, Minn esot a 55344 Ph one:952-648-0236 F ax: 952b16-0290 W W W. eVSCn9.c om MEDINA City of M edi na, MN 2052 County Road 24 M edin a, Mi nnes ot a 55340 Phone: 763-473-4643 Fax: 763-473-9359 www .ci .m edl nam n. us FINAL PLAT PROJ ECT WO ODLAND HILL PRESERVE LOC ATIO N MEDINA, MN S HEET SITE PLAN # DATE REVISION A 08/152014 GRADIN G 8 UTIUTIES B 08/182014 WATERSHED C OM MENTS I H ER EB Y CER TIFY THA T THIS P LAN, SPECIFICATI ON, OR REPORT WAS PREPAR ED BY ME OR U NDER MY DIR ECT S UPERVISION AN D THAT I AM A DULY LICE NSE D PR OFESSI ONAL ENGIN EER UN DER THE LAWS OF TI IE STATE OF MINNESO TA. David Nash D ATE 07/ 10 2014 REGISTRA TIO N NUMBER 21836 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY VN DJN DATE PROJECT # 7 .15 .2014 2014-008.1 SHEET N UMBER TYPICAL LOT 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET C201 Tag 0 Type Caber (n.) Trees Caber Removal 948 Maple 11 947 Maple 9 948 Maple 15 949 Mille 10 950 Basswood 28 26 951 Maple 12 12 952 Ba sswood 48 48 953 Maple 14 14 954 Maple 9 9 955 Oak 35 35 956 Basswood 11 11 957 Maple 11 11 958 1 a 13 13 959 Basswoo d 18 18 980 Basswood 63 63 981 Maple 11 11 962 Oak 27 27 963 Maple 9 9 964 Basswood 18 16 965 Butternut 10 10 968 O ak 42 42 967 Maple 8 8 968 Maple 18 18 969 Maple 9 9 970 Maple 9 9 971 Maple 10 10 972 Ba sswo od 13 13 973 Oak 13 13 974 Mille 8 6 975 Oak 25 25 976 Maple 9 9 977 Maple 9 9 978 Maple 9 9 979 Maple 18 18 980 Maple 19 19 981 Oak 30 30 982 Mope 9 9 963 Basswood 17 17 964 Maple 8 8 965 Maple 14 14 986 Male 9 967 Maple 8 988 Maple 9 989 Basswood 17 990 Maple 8 991 Maple 15 992 Maple 9 993 Maple 10 Tap 8 Type Caliper (a.) Trees Cafper Removal 1593 Map. 21 1504 Maple 12 1595 Maple 11 1598 Maple 17 1597 Maple 24 1598 Mpb 8 8 1599 Ma ple 9 9 1800 Maps 9 9 1601 Maple 29 29 1602 MOD 11 11 11103 Maple 18 16 1804 O ak 31 31 1805 Maps 9 9 1608 Ma ple 16 1807 Maple 8 1806 Ma p. 21 21 1809 Maple 17 17 1810 Maple 20 20 1811 Maple 28 28 1612 Maple 15 15 1613 Maple 20 20 1814 Maple 11 11 1815 M aple 12 12 1616 Maple 14 14 1617 Ma ple 6 8 1618 Maple 20 1819 Maple 15 15 1820 Maple 14 1621 Maple 14 1822 Ma ple 19 1823 Maple 9 1824 Maple 11 1825 Maple 9 1826 Maple 12 1621 Maple 9 1628 Maple 8 1829 Maple 8 1630 Maple 8 Tag M Type Caliper (M .) Tre es Casper Removal 994 Elm 9 995 Maps 9 9 998 Maple 9 9 997 Maple 13 13 998 Elm 10 10 999 Maple 14 14 1000 Oak 23 23 1201 Oak 27 27 1202 Oak 19 19 1203 Maple a 8 1204 Oak 23 23 1205 0* 24 24 1206 Oak 17 17 1207 Oak 27 27 1208 Oak 24 24 1209 Oak 30 30 1210 Oak 15 1211 Oak 16 1212 Oak 38 1213 M aple 12 1214 Maple 11 11 1215141e 12 12161430e 21 1217 Maple 9 1218 Oak 21 21 12190* 28 28 1220 Basswood 12 12 1221 Basswood 11 11 1222 Bassw ood 9 9 1223 Bass wood 18 18 1224 Bassw ood 12 12 1225 Basswood 9 9 1226 Basswood 19 19 1227 Maple 10 10 1228 Oak 18 18 1229 Basswood 16 16 1230 Maple 10 1231 Maple 12 1232 Maple 9 9 1233 Male 13 13 1234 Bassw ood 21 21 1235 Elm 16 18 1236 Maple 8 8 1237 Oak 12 12 1238 Maple 9 9 1239 Maple 9 9 1240 Maple 9 9 1241 Maple 10 10 1242 Basswood 12 12 Tap4 Type Caber (In.) Ti .as Casp er R emoval 1243 Bass wood 18 18 1244 Basswood 18 18 1245 Basswood 18 16 1248 Mapl e 25 1247 Maple 12 1248 Maple 8 8 1249 Maple 9 9 1250 M aple 12 12 1251 M apl e 10 10 1252 Maple 11 1253 Maple 11 11 1254 Maple 10 1255 O ak 40 1258 Maple 12 1257 Oak 24 1258 M aple 10 1259 Maple 11 1260 EM 9 1261 Oak 20 1262 Maple 22 1263 Oak 29 1264 Maple 8 3 1285 Bassw ood 13 13 1288 Maple 9 9 1267 M aple 9 9 1268 Maple 9 9 1269 M aple 13 13 1270 Oak 20 20 1271 Maple 10 10 1272 Mapl e 9 9 1273 Maple 12 12 1274 Maple 10 10 1275 Maple 11 11 1278 Mapl e a 1277 Maple 18 18 1278 Oak 28 28 1279 Maple 9 9 1289 Maple 12 12 1281 Maple 10 10 1282 Oak 25 25 1283 Basswood 11 11 1284 Oak 29 29 1255 Basswood 19 19 1256 Maple 11 11 1287 Maple 13 13 1288 Oak 20 20 1289 Mapl e 11 11 1290 Maple 14 14 1291 Oak 34 34 1292 M aple 9 1293 Basswood 12 Tag* Typa Caliper (in.) Trees C aliper Removal 1290 Maple 10 1295 Basswood 28 1296 Map le 11 11 1297 Basswood 20 20 1298 Maple 9 9 1299 Mapl e 13 13 1300 Basswood 9 9 1486 Mapl e 20 1501 Basswood 8 8 1502 Basswood 16 16 1503 Basswood 22 22 1504 Maple 32 32 1505 Maple 10 10 1506 Maple 11 11 1507 Oak 34 34 1508 Basswood 22 22 1509 Basswood 29 29 1510 Basswood 9 9 1511 Mapl e 20 20 1512 Maple 9 9 1513 M aple 10 10 1514 M aple 15 1515 Maple 9 1516 Maple 11 11 1517 Maple 10 10 1518 Elm 8 1519 Maple 8 8 1520 Ash 16 1521 Maple 13 13 1522 Maple 11 11 1523 Maple 10 10 1524 Maple 15 15 1525 Mapl e 9 9 1526 Elm 9 9 1527 Mapl e 8 1528 Maple 12 12 1529 Maple 12 12 1530 Ash 24 24 1531 Oak 12 1532 Mapl e 12 1533 M aple 12 1534 Maple 9 1535 Map le 10 1536 Basswo od 17 1537 Ash 27 1538 Ash 12 1539 Ash 10 1540 Maple 13 1541 Maple 12 Tap 0 Type Caliper lin .) Tre es Caliper Removal 1542 Maple 23 1543 Maple 8 1544 Maple 23 1545 Maple 16 1546 Maple 13 1547 Maple 12 1548 Maple 18 1549 Maple 18 1550 Maps 16 1551 Maple 10 1552 Maple 14 1553 Maple 15 1554 Maple 18 1555 Maple 9 1556 Mapl e 18 1557 Basswood 39 1558 B asswo od 21 1559 Maple 19 1560 M aple 16 1561 Maple 14 1582 Maple 9 1563 Basswood 19 1564 sips 11 1565 Maple 17 1566 M aple 23 1587 Mapl e 13 1568 Maple 10 1589 Maple 11 1570 Maple 9 1571 M ille 8 1572 O ak 27 1573 Maple 9 9 1574 Mapl e 19 19 1575 Maple 9 9 1576 Maple 14 1577 Maple 17 1578 Nape 13 1579 Maple 12 1580 Maple 14 1581 Mapl e 11 1582 Male 18 1563 Maple 20 1584 Maps 8 1585 Maple a 1586 Mope 10 1587 Mile 9 1588 Maple 13 1589 M ale 17 1590 Oak 27 1591 Maple 19 1592 Basswood 28 ENGINEERIN G SURVEYIN G ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC. 10250 Valley View R oad , S olve 123 Ed en Pr airi e, Mi nnos ofa 55344 Ph one: 952448-0238 F ax: 952 448 4290 www .evsen9.wm MEDINA CRy of Medina, MN 2052 C ounty R oad 24 M edina, Mi nnuota 55340 Ph one: 783734843 Fa:: 783473-9359 www.d .m edln a.m n.ue FINAL PLAT PR OJ ECT W OODLAND HILL PRESERVE LOCATIO N MEDIN A, MN SHEET TREE INVENTORY & PRESERVATION PLAN # DATE REVISI ON I H EREBY CERTIF Y TH AT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATI ON, OR R EP ORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UN DER M YDIREC T SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENS ED P ROF ESSI ONAL ENGIN EE R UNDER THE LAWS OF THE S TATE OF MINNES OTA. David Nash DATE 07515/ 2014 REGIS TRATI ON NUMBER 21838 DRAWN BY CHE CKED BY VN DJN D AT E P ROJECT# 7.15.2014 2014-008 .1 SHEE T NUMBER C103 ROAD EASEMENT 703617 AND 1243225 1 LOT NUMBER 10 SIDE YA RD SETBACK 125 MIN DEPTH SUGGESTED GARAG E 1 LOCA TIO N GARA GE ELEV. IF STEPS REQUIRED FINISHED G ROUND ELEVA TIO N BLOCK 1 15 LOT 15 88163.7 S. F. 2.02 ACRES 37'- 133. 4' II ACCESS & GRADING EASEM ENT \ 128. 6' Dra inage an d Utility Eas me n) PER DOC. N0. 50 8736 d9eat Sid er 7 S 4 VA CATE EXISTING EASEMENT \ / 67. 8 �EJCISTIN / SA NITARY D&U EA SEMENT / 7 i / /8 LOT 8 \ 59,478.1 S. F. \ \\ 1.37 A CRES RETA INING WA LL - - - \ r2O'SWALE\I_ `I &BA SIN } D&U I 20' STORM D& SMENT EA SEM ENT \ 9 r"7I \ 20' SWA LE / D&U EASM EN/ 1 / 1 ...-20' SWALE \ I �\ / L --� �----J 188.8' / LOT 9 25,947.3 S. F. 0. 60 ACRES 7 LO T 7 53, 211.6 S. F. 1.22 A CRES M55- -Ra25 VA CATE EXISTING EASEMENT / ,;1\s• \90 • / 1 20' WATERM AIN D&U EA SEM ENT/ LOT 10 29,889.5 S. F. 0. 69 ACRES 90' MIN. LOT WIDTH TYPICAL LOT 30' REAR YARD SETBACK(TYP.) 15 SIDE YARD SETBA CK GROUND ELEVATION LO WEST FLOO R ELEVATION STRUCTURE TYPE (SEE BELO V✓) BUILDING PAD Na OF STEPS (IF REQUIRED) GRAD E AT FRONT OF HOUSE 25 FRONT Y ARD SETBA CK (30 FOR GARAGES) 2 D &U EASM ENT 10 3 -s R • RAMBLER. GRA DED FOR 9 DEFER ENCE FROM THE BASEM ENT FLO OR ELEVATIO N TO FRONT GRADE ELEVATION AT GARAGE. LO = FULL BASEM EN T LOOKOUT. SIDE LOOKO UT. GRADED FO R 59 OF DEFERENCE FROM THE LOOKOUT GRADE ELEVATION TO FRONT GRACE ELEVATIO N AT GARAGE. WO = FULL BASEMENT WALKOU T. GRPD EO FOR 9 OF DEFERENCE FROM THE BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRO NT GRADE ELEVATION AT GARAGE. (1) =1 STEP (06) UP FROM GARAGE FLO OR ELEVATION TO FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION. (2) = 2 STEPS (1.2) LA FROM GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION TO FIRST FLOOR ELEVATIO N. r I/LOT 11 22,332. 8 S.F. / 0.51 ACR ES iv LOT 6 42,215.0 S. F. 0. 97 ACRES I 4 BLOO 2 - 0 II II II II II II L 39.2' v 5 5 BLOCK 1 / LOT 5 60,504. 3 S.F. 1.39 ACRES -0& ESM NT 3 I / LOT 13 21,155.2 S. F. 0. 49 ACRES A / 14 LOT 4 88,262.8 S.F. 2.03 ACRES LOT 14 17,546. 3 S.F. 0.40 ACRES ISTIN GJ� \ \ SANITARY DSU \EASEMENT 4\ 20' SANITA Y\ 3 DOS EASEM $ \. 4 S '\4\ \ \ yGa \m. LOT3 54,129. 5 S.F. 1.24 ACRES 228.2' 7 LOT SCHEDULE LOT NUMBER BLOCK NUMBER SQUAR E FEET ACRES OUTLOT A - 17,195 0. 39 1 1 33,710 0. 77 2 1 36,539 0.84 3 1 54,130 1.24 4 1 88,263 2 .03 5 1 60,504 1.39 6 1 42,215 0.97 7 1 53,212 1 .22 8 1 59,478 1.37 9 1 25,947 0 .60 10 1 29,890 0.69 11 1 22,333 0.51 12 1 24,738 0.57 13 1 21,165 0 .49 14 1 17,646 0.40 15 1 88,164 2 .02 \ \ \ \ \\ 2\ LOT 2 \\ 36,539.4 S.F. 0. 84 ACRES 'm\ 7 7 246. 0' \7s \ N_�. 4 4F • 114 LO T 1 .} \ - - -\ 33,708. 8 S.F. 'pr` \ - 0.77A CR ES / OUTLOT A- -- IN L OT 0 17,195 .9 S.F. 0.39 ACRES __ENTIREOUTLOT A IS r - STORM EASEMENT IN D&U E ASEMENT 2 245 .13' BLOCK 3 SINGLE FAMILY SITE DEVEL OPMENT SUMMARY 7I - \L . GROSS SITE = LESS WETL AND = LESS 30' BUFFER = 16.33 AC 7 .40 AC 0.94 AC NET SITE AREA= 7.99 AC DENSITY = REO DENSITY = NOTES 1.88 U/AC 2.00-3.49 U/AC LOT SUMMARY MINIMUM LOT SIZE MINI MUM LOT WIDTH MINIMUM LOT DEPTH MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS C OVERAGE NUMBER OF LOTS SETBACKS FRONT YARD FOR GAR AGE D OORS FA CIN G STREET FOR SIDE -LOAD GARAGE SIDE YARD REAR YARD AVERA GE WETLA ND BUFFER MINIMUM W ETLAND BUFFER MINIMUM WETLAND SETBA CK EXISTI NG ZONING PROPOSED ZONING 1. ALL DI MENSI ONS ROUNDED TO THE NE AREST TENTH F OOT. 2. ALL DI MENSI ONS ARE BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. BACK OF CURB IS SHOWN GRAPHICALLY ONLY . 3. STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPR OVAL BY THE CITY . 4 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL BE PR OVIDED OVER ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES AND UP TO ONE (1) FOOT ABOVE T HE HIGH WATER LEVEL OF ALL P ONDS. 11,000 SF 90 FT 100 FT 40% OF TOTAL LOT AREA 15 UNITS 25 FT 30 FT 20 FT 25 FT T OTAL (MIN 10 FT ON ONE SIDE) 30 FT 30 FT 20 FT 15 FT RU RAL RESIDENTIAL (URBAN RESERVE) SINGLE FA MILY RESIDENTIAL R-1 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET '113Lrti EVS, IN C. 10250 Valley Vi ew R oad, Suite 123 Eden Prairi e, Mi nnesot a 55344 Ph one: 952-646-0236 Fax: 952-646-0290 www .e vs-eng .com ` 11 T T 0 ‘7, / MEDINA City of Medina, MN 2052 C ounty R oad 24 Medin a, Minnesot a 55340 Ph on e: 763-473-4643 Fax: 763 73-9359 www .ci.medina.mn. us FINAL PLAT P ROJE CT WOODLAND HILL PRESERVE L OC ATION MEDINA, MN SHE ET PRELIMINARY PLAT # D ATE RE VISION ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TI IIS P LAN, SPECIFI CATION, OR REPO RT WAS PREP ARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPE RVISION A ND TIIAT I AM A DUL Y LIC ENS ED PROF ESSION AL ENGIN EER UN DER T HE LAWS OF THE S TATE OF MINNESOT A. D avid Na sh DA TE 07/ 15/ 2014 RE.GIS'TR ATION NUM BER 21836 DRAWN BY VN DATE 7.15 .2014 CHECK ED BY DJN P ROJECT # 2014-008.1 SHEET NUMBER C202 it - -aL_ 4---re5e 4Y M /4 . ! 1%9888 B V ,4 Mat hr Mo • 7,13/ / . 14 4. 4 FILTR ATION B ASIN 2 ...--t, 7/ 1,7" --- BOTTO M=968 .0 -4 0 6 C.AP =990 .2_ 6 - LI \ 990.2 990.2 990 5 G/E_ - e40 .5G TeSe .. \\ \ "S9 = SHED . .� " J/ r XO -'o 0 O O OO I � J� / i 91 , 0 OApA4 FL• 1O11e\ In w100e. 9 x7 NOTE TO CONTRACTOR 1003 6 G " --- O 004 d N10013. LEGEND 01¢0G 01018.0G, / P116:8BW DES=RV- 0 1011 C) _1010.0 G \ 10190G • 1018.0 G t V THE EROSION CONTRO L PLAN SHEETS ALONG WTH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT O NSITE UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERM INA TIO N IS FILED WTH THE MPCA TH6 CO NTRACTO R MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIO NA L REQUIREM ENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BM PS DESIG NED TO CORRECT PROBLEM S IDENTIFIED. AFTER FIUNG THE NOTICE OF TERMINA TIO N, THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE ERO SION CONTR OL PL AN SHEETS, AND ALL REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTIO N REQUIREMEN TS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE. GRADING NOTES 1. PRO POSED CON TOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION. SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG PROPO SED CURB DENO TE FLOWLINE GRADE. 2. THE CO NTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIO NS NECESSARY TO AVO ID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PRO PERTIES DURING TIE CONSTRUCTIO N PH ASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE C ON TRAC TOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUC TION PHA SES OF TH IS PRO JECT. 3. TH E CON TR ACTOR SHA LL C OMP LETE TH E SITE GRA DING CONSTRUCTION IN ACCO RD ANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF TH E O WNERS SO ILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SH ALL BE COM PLETED BY THE OWNERS SOILS ENGINEER. TIE CONTRACTOR SH ALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORD INATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS W ITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTA INING TRAFFIC CONTROL D EVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARMING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGM EN AND UGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WH ERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CO NTROL DEVICES SH ALL CO NFORM TO APPROPRIATE M INNESOTA DEPARTM ENT Cf TRANSPO RTATION STANDARDS. 5. 5. THE TREES AND OTHER NATURAL VEGETATION WITHIN THE PROJECT AND/OR ADACENT TO THE PRO JECT ARE OF PRIM E CONCERN TO THE CO NTRACTORS OPERATIONS AND SHALL 9E A RESTRICTED AREA . HE WILL BE REQU IRED TO PRO TECT THE TREES WHICH ARE TO BE SAVED TO BE SURE TH AT THE EQUIPMENT IS NOT NEEDLESSLY OPERATED UND ER NEARBY TREES AN D STALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN WORKING ADJACENT TO TREES. SHOULD ANY PORT ON Of THE TR EE BRANCHES REQUIRE REMOVA L TO PERM IT OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTORS EQUIPM ENT, HE SHALL OBTAIN 11E SERVICES OF A PROFESSIONAL TREE TRIMM NG SERVICE TO TRIM THE TREES PRIO R TO THE BEGINNING OF O PERATION. SHOULD TIE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS RESU LT IN TH E BREA KING OF A NY LIMBS, THE BROKEN LIM BS SHOULD BE REMO VED IMMEDI ATELY AND CUTS SHALL BE PROPERLY PROTECTED TO MNIMIZE ANN LASTING DAMAG E TO TH E TREE. NO TREES SHALL BE REMOVED VATHOUT AUTHORIZATION 51 THE ENGINEER. COSTS FOR TRIM MING SER VICES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION *NO NO SPECIAL PAYMENT WILL BE MADE. 8. IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE. HE OR SHE SH ALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 11 TH THE LOCATIO N, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE I5 ACTI VE. NO ACTIVE TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOU T REVIEW, D ISCUSSION AND APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENG IN EER. 7. ALL RETAINING WALLS TALLER THAN 4 FEET SH ALL BE DESIGNED BY A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 8. MAXIMUM SLOPE TO BE 3:I 9. M AXIMUM DRIVEWAY SLOPE SHO WN IS 10% WETL AND OHW = 983.5 WA_ = 984 .0 707 L 1101QD CONCRETE' ASHOU - v —I ROCK CONBTRUCTI N ENTRANCE DINA SPOT ELEVATIONS: '1B CY RIP RAP��� II\ GIEO-� ` go' II .5 0 i AC SS EASEMENT 10 WIDE (TIP) I mid, M ACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONT OUR PROPOSED STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTION DEVICE - IN STREET ER OSION C ONTR OL BLANKET- CATEGORY 3 RIPRAP W/NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTR ANCE r 915 .0 915.0 TW BW 915.08 7 (TWBW) RETAININ G WALL (FF) FINISHED FLOOR (G) FINISHED GRADE (B) BITUMINOUS (C) CONCRETE ( GL) GUTTER LINE (1C) T OP BACK OF CURB (') MATCH EXISTING LOT CORNER 8 GUTTER LINE ELEVATIONS ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRON MENTAL PL ANNING EVS, INC . 10250 Valley View Road , Suite 123 Ed en Prairi e, Mi nnesot a 55344 Ph one: 952-648-0236 Fax: 952 -646-0290 www. ev5- eng.com ` 1 T Y 0 CoP4 MEDINA City of Medi na, MN 2052 C ounty Ro ad 24 Medina, Minn es ota 55340 Pho ne: 763-473-4643 Fax: 763-473-9359 www .cl .medln a.mn. us FINAL PLAT PROJECT WOODLAND HILL PRESERVE LOC ATION MEDINA, MN S HE ET GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN # DATE R EVISION 1 I IEREBY CERTIFY TIIA T 7'I IIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPOR T WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UN DER MY DIR ECT SUPERVISION AND TI NA T I AM A DULY LICENSE D PROF ESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. D avid Nash DATE 07/ 15/2014 REGIS TRA TION N UMBER 21836 DRAWN BY CHEC KED BY VN DJN D AT E P ROJECT # 7.15.2014 2014-008.1 SHEET NUMBE R 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET C301 1 4. IRim.986.52 e v:969.4 LEGEND • • / • / GATE VALVE HYDRANT WATERMAIN WATER SERVICE S ANITARY MANHO LE S ANITARY SEWER SANITARY SERVICE STORM CATCH BA SIN/ O UTLET CO NTROL STRUCTURE / FLARED END SECTION STORM SEWER X 10 FOOT ROAD EASEM ENT PER OOC. N0. 703617 AND 1243225 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET SANMH 8107 RIM =1010.20 INV(SE)=1003. 75 r \ 1020 1015 1010 1005 PVC 30'-8" VC 25'-6' PVC RELOCATED SALV AGED \ HYDRANT & GATE VALVE. 24'-8" PVC CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" WATER MAIN WITH LO NG SLEEVE & 6' GV FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF EXISTING 8" WATERMAIN (6'38" REDUCER). HORZ. 1"= 50 VER. 1"=5' SANMH 4107 RIM=1010.20 INV(SE)=1003.75 SALVAGED HYDRAN T &6"GV N COVER CO NNECT TO EXISTING TUB -INV. ELEV=1003.62 8" PVC • 0.39% IB"PVCWATERMA ' CONNECT TO 6' EX WATERMAIN 6A \ BLOCK 1 15 L 1004 WO 1012 STA. 2+16. 0 (38') ELV= 1001R J i f mee t 6736 - / r Rim 96x. 55 - Im 9It.- /�- 44n:955.95i" ELV= 996.0 8" WATERMA/N \ 9 ST . 0+00 t 00P E0 .\O p I 8" BEND \ 00 F4 1 VP'I DRILLED 34'8'PVC -039% BEND CONNECT TO AND EXTEND EXISTING\ SANITARY SEWER STUB, FIELD VERIFY EXISTING INVERT. CONTACT \ ENGINEER IF DIFFERENT THAN INDICA TED. EXISTING INVERT= 1003.62 S PROPOSED INVERT =1003.62 N REMOVE, SALVAGE & RELOCATE EXISTING HYDRANT & GATE VALVE. REMOV E 6' DIP BACK TO EXPOSE 6' DIP FOR CONNECTION, 1025 1020 1015 1010 1005 1000 995 7 LFE•009 C STA 0+ 61.14 (70') ELV= 996. 0 6 1001 LFE. 1001 WO 1011 arr Fim: 914. 7 \ BLOCK 1 O STA. 0+21. 83 (72') ELV= 998.0 NMH #104 RIM=101025'-' SW)=193. 33' (E)=99533 STA 1+27. 62 57.4'3' ELV= 1007 0 G 1020 (LUr LFE=1010 1020 SANMH 8105 RIM=1010.081 INV(NE)=994.00 STA 1+33.16 LV=1001.0 10 HY DRANT . 6" GV 7.5' M IN COVER SANMH#105- RIM= 1010.08 INV(NE)=994.00. PVC WATERMAIN SANM H 8104 RIM=/010.25 INV(SS)+993. 33 INV(E)=993.33 SANMH 8101 RIM =1010. 26 INV(SE)=993.58 INV (W)=992. 70 INV(NE)=992.70 HOR2. 1"=50' ci 1020 1015 1010 1005 1000 995 SANMH 8103 RIM=1008.37 INV(NW)=995 .00 STA. 0+ 39 ELV= 998:5 STA 0+77.64(20) ELV= 1001.5 SA NMH 8101 RIM=1010. 26 INV(SE)=993.58 IN QV N _)92. 70 64V( E)- 92.70 i 1I511 + /-0t STA 0+ .5 61 ELV= 996. , STA. 0+ 02.72 ELV= 1002.0 SANMH 8102 IM= 1010.16 _.. .. 14 14 71'-8'PV+•0.50% 1 STA. 1+ 29. 18 (2 1007.0 BU ILD WATER TIGHT MANHO LE WITH WATER TIGH T FLEXIBLE BOOTS AT OVER EXISTING SANITA RY SEWER. FIELD VERIFY EXISTING INVERT. CO NTACT ENGINEER IF DIFFERENT THAN INDICA TED, EXISTING INV ERT = 973.97 PROPOSED INVERT =974.47 SA NMH 8100 RIM=984. 66 INV(SW)=974.47 EX ISTING SANITA RY `48LF• 0. 43% STA . 0 13. :. 61.6) ELV=9• +. - SANM H 8103 RIM =1008.37 -- -- --CONNEC T TO EXISTING 8" WATERMAIN WITH LONG SLIEEVE & 8" GV FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF EXISTING 8" WATERMA IN (6'+8" REDUCER) I 4 RELOCATED SALVA GED HYDRA NT & G ATE VALVE. \ A Rim: 995.34 STA. ELV= 1+70.62 (68. .' REMO . " SALVAGE & RELOCATE EXISTING 'HYDRANT & GA TE VALVE. RE MO VE 6' DIP CK TO EXPOSE 6' DIP FOR CONNECTION. -6" PVC 1020 NOTES 1. THE CONTRAC TOR IS SPECIFICALLY CA UTIONED THAT THE LOCA TION AND/OR ELEVATIO N OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BAS ED ON RECO RDS OF THE VA RIOUS UTILITY COM PANIES AND, WHERE PO SSIBLE, M EASUREM ENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD, THE INFORMATION IS NO T TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXAC T OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTO R MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTIUTY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HO URS BEFORE ANY EXCAV ATION TO REQUEST EXA CT FIELD LOCA TIO N OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHIC H C ON FLICT WITH THE PROPO SED IM PRO VEMENTS SHOWN ON TH E PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR, BY CAI I ING GOPHER STATE ONE CA LL AT (651) 454-0002. 2. SAFETY NO TICE TO CONTRA CTORS, IN ACC ORD AN CE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTIO N PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTO R SILL BE SO LELY AND COMPLETELY RESPO NSIBLE FO R CON DITIONS ON THE JO B SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORM ANCE OF THE WO RK THIS REQU IREM EN T WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY A ND NOT BE LIM ITED TO NORM AL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELO PER TO CO NDUCT CONSTRU CTION REV IEW OF THE CONTRACTO RS PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CO NTRA CTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN , ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 3. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CO NSTRUCTION SHA LL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED BENEATH THE SOD. 4 FINISHED G RA DE IS THE CENTERLINE PROFILE. MANHOLE RIMS DEVIATE FROM THE CENTERLINE ELEVATION AS A RESULT OF TH EIR OFFSET AND A RE SHOWN ACCO RDING LY 5. SEWER SERVICE STATION SHO WN IS THE DISTANCE FROM DOW NSTREA M M ANHOLE TO WYE CONNECTION. 6. CITY OF MEDINA STANDARD DETAIL SPECIFICATIONS SHALL GOVERN. SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN MATERIAL NOTES ALL M ATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MO DIFIED HERIN. 1. ALL M ATERIALS SHALL COMPLY 5807 04 T HE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. R' . 985.72 \ In, 915. 11 2. ALL SANITARY SEW ER TO BE PVC SDR-35 FR OM 0-18' DEEP, OR I SDR-26 FROM >18' DEEP, UNLESS N OTED OT HERWSE. 7.5' MIN COVER SAN MH 8102 RIM=1010.16 INV(SE)=994.14 INN(WW)=994.14 MIA7ERMR '1`- 6 H0R2. . 1"=50'. VER. 1"=5' HYDRANT _ SANMH #101 RI M=1010.26 I V(SE)=993 .58 NV(VV)=992.70 I V(NE)=992.70 8 or 8 ci 1015 1010 1005 1000 995 990 985 980 975 3. 5. 6. 12 INCH WATERMAIN TO BE PVC C-900 DR14, AND 81NCH WATERMAIN TO BE PVC C-900 DR18 WITH 7 .5 FEET MINIMUM C OVER. ALL WATER MAIN SERVICES SHALL 8E I INCH HOPE . ALL SANITA RY SEWER SERVICES TO BE 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40. NO PRIV ATE IRRIG ATI ON SYSTEM SHALL CONNECT TO CITY OF MEDINA WATERMAIN. HOR Z 1"- 50 ' S ANMH 8101 RIM=100.28 V[NV(SE)=993.58 - - - INV(NE3=992 .70 8 8 SA NMH 8100 RIM=984;.66 . IN V(S)=974 .47 _ EX IN V =973.97 8 ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC. 10250 Valley Vi ew R oad, S uit e 123 Eden Prairi e, Mi nnesota 55344 Pho ne: 952-648-0236 Fax: 952-848-0290 W W W. evs- eng.c oi n `4T Y 0A • MEDINA City of M edina, MN 2052 Co unty R oad 24 Medina, Mi nn es ota 55340 Ph on e: 763-473-4643 Wax: 763 .473-9359 ww ci.me di na.mn .us FINAL PLAT P ROJECT WOODLAND HILL PRESERVE LOC ATI ON MEDINA, MN SH EET SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN PLAN & PROFILES # DATE REVISION I I IE REI9V CERTIFY TH AT THIS PLAN, SP ECIFICATIO N, OR R EPORT WAS PR EPARE D I3Y ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT S UP ERVISION AN D THAT I AM A D UL Y LI CENS ED PROF ESSIONAL ENGINEER U NDER THE IAWS OF THE STA TE OF MI NNES OTA. David Nash DATE 07115/ 2014 RE GISTRATION NUMI3ER 21838 DRAWN BY C HEC KE D BY VN DJN D AT E PR OJECT # 7 .15.2014 2014-008 .1 SHEET NUMBER 0+00 0+ 00 1+00 2+00 -0+50 0+00 1 +00 2 +00 3 +00 0 +00 1+00 2 +00 C501 1015 1010 1005 1000 995 n 656 NOTES of War 14 R14:984.55 s- 11 FILTRATI ON BASININ 2/� " CY11 BOTTOM=988.0 - �1(f HVJL=990 .2 12' FES 8112\ ` ''r CY RIP RAP f INV=885.0 R�P @2 .23\ \ OCS 2 - 27"71 _Fat490.0 =9854 \ \ BLOCK 1 \\ �\ \ �\��-�/ r - aG / 9 I \\\ / / / 7 p7+ ---'1o1@ I / I j\\,/ % 1/ Iz �i L z ( r / \ I(, �1 oG 1 I �\I`�\ I1 -J L 'r.- - ,0,2'-- J L-InF1b07. 4 1004 WO 1012 lost1008. .--,_ 110RZ. VER I "=50" 1„=5, CBMH 8208 RIM= .30 }N (S)-1004.' 9 INV (SW)=1004. 18. --^- CBMH IN NE IN NE INV ( $207 09.00 )=1001.98 1001.78 \ \ \ \ \ \ 123' -2' RCP@ 1.794- \ \ 163'-15 RCP @ 6.02% - ,- .9 0+00 1+00 1010 1005 2+ 00 RIM =1007.90 INV IND=100377 CB 8205 H OR VER. \ 1"=50' 1 "=5' \ CB H8202 \ =1007. INRI (NW)=109003.29 IN (SW)=1003.49 IN (SE)=1003.29 28-'2' RCP @1. 004- 1020 1015 1010 1005 1000 995 BLOCK 1 J LFE=1901 1 / / 5 BtLEANOUT 12 0 RIM= NV o ay // // ~�- HORZ. 1 "= VER. ("=5' 50 CBMH 8201 RIM=1008.70 INV (NW)=998 INV (E)=998.79 99 \ \ \ \ \ 94'-15" RCP @ 5.10% \ Si 8 0*00 1010 1005 1+ 00 R HOPI \ VER 3BMH 8204 - M.1009.30 1"=50' r=5' INV (NE )=1004.37 INV \i.......4 CBMH INV 1NV #203 (S 09.30 (SVV(=1004.51 (SE)=1004.37 29'-12' RCP@ -0.504 -. IR iii 0+00 1025 1020 1015 1010 1005 1000 P 0+90 EV.1rn C8 Rim:98N .34 /,n* 974 .4s\ \\ D IN r \ V RDADRAIN 2 \ RI 99!(75 \\ V •2. .7 17 LF-6"DRAT ILE �T RETAININGW L UNDAT11ON . OG`�ETA 96 LF H x'E @ FES �1w 6�RIP-RAP � a 0V 969.2/ 25LF-1Y FILTRATION =ASIN 1 B OTTOM=987.5 IiWL=992 .2 990 INN= ,9§2-...._...... .994 BMH 8201 y,�, MATCH LINE 0-65 I REMOVE ±20LF EX 69 ,40 ERGENCY OV RIP RAP 1. THE CONTR ACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED TH AT THE L OCATION AND/OR ELEVATI ON OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOW N ON THESE PLA NS IS BASED ON REC ORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND, WHERE P OSSIBLE, MEASURE ME NTS T AKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATI ON IS N OT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EX ACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACT OR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 H OURS BEF ORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EX ACT FIELD LOC ATI ON OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO REL OCATE ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES WHICH CONFLICT WTH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATI ONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBT AINED BY THE CONTRA CTOR, BY C ALLING GOPHER ST ATE ONE CALL AT (651) 454-0002. 2 SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACT ORS'. IN ACCORDANCE WTH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR SILL BE S OLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITI ONS ON THE 108 SITE, INCLUDIN G SAFETY OF ALL PERS ONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERF ORMANCE OF THE WORK THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY C ONTINU OUSLY AND N OT BE LI MITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS . THE D UTY OF THE ENGI NEER OR THE DE VELOPER TO CONDU CT CONSTRUCTI ON REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORM ANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACT OR'S S AFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NE AR THE CONSTRUCTIO N SITE. 3 ALL A RE AS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY B OUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY C ONSTRUCTI ON SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WTH 6 INCHES OF T OPS OIL PLACED BENEATH THE S OD. 4. FINISHED GRADE IS THE CENTERLINE PROFILE . MANHOLE RI MS DEVIATE FR OM THE CENTERLINE ELEVATION AS A RESULT OF THEIR OFFSET AND ARE SHOWN ACC ORDIN GLY. LEGEND • /• / 1015 1010 1005 G ATE VALVE HYDRANT W ATERMAIN SANITARY MA NHOLE SANITARY SEWER STOR M C ATCH BASIN / OUTLET CONTR OL STRUCTURE / FLARED END SECTION ST ORM SEWER 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET \ \ CB 8209 RI M=1009 .30 INV (51=1004.33 CBMH 8208 009 .30 - INV (S)=1004 .19 INV (SW.1004.18 29'-12' RCP @ 0.564 0+00 HO RZ 1."=50' VER , 1"=5' . 5w. .CB MH6201 __.__... .RIM=100@ 70 ..... INV (4 95.998.*9 ...iW IE)=998 .70 - w � 1.00% . . .. . ... . . . . . 2.184 HIGH P7 S T4 = 2+09 .29 HIGH PT ELE V = 1010 .33 PVI ELEV=1010.50 HIGH PT A=4+00 .00 .._. HIGH PT ELEV = 1010.38 PVI STA . -' PVI ELEV= '1010.50 --. . . AD. -2 °0 g 14- ____ . g v+ U7 ILI 100% / CBMH 6(05----- 61M=1009.30....... ._..,, INV (SVv1=1004.51 INV (SE) =1004 .37 89'- 12'' 5CP @ .4. 84% . `-CB MH 8202 RI M=1007.30 14'-12'RCP 90,51 % INV (NW ) 003.29 IN V(SW)= 003.49 ---INV (SE)=1003:29' L6' / CBMH 8208 ---RIM=1009.30 tNV (S)'1004:19 INV (304=1004.10 123-12' RCP 5 1.79% .SEE.. STO RM.- . PLAA ON THIS SHEET gi 5 `o g :z1 0+ 00 1+ 00 2+00 3 +00 4+00 5+00 ENGINEERIN G SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC . 10250 Valley View Ro ad, Suite 123 Ede n Prairi e, Mi nne sot a 55344 Ph one: 952 .646-0238 F ax: 952-646-0290 www .evseng.com MEDINA City of M edina, MN 2052 C ounty Road 24 Medin a, Mi nnesot a 55340 Ph one: 763473-4643 F ax: 763-473-9359 www.ci.m edi na.m n.us FINAL PLAT P ROJ ECT WOODLAND HILL PRESERVE LOCATI ON MEDIN A, MN SH EET STREET & STORM SEWER PLAN & PROFILE DAISY CIRCLE # DATE R EVISI ON 1 I-IEREB Y CERTIF Y TH AT THIS PLNN, SPECIFICA TIO N, OR REPORT W AS PREPAR ED BY ME OR UN DER MY DIR ECT S UP ERVISION AND THA T I AM A DULY LICE NSED PROFESSI ONAL EN GI NEER UND ER TH E LAWS OF THE S TATE OF MINNESOTA. David Nash DATE 07/ 15( 2014 RE GISTRA'T 'ION N UMBER 21836 DR AWN BY VN D AT E 7.15 .2014 CHEC KED BY DJN P ROJEC T # 2014-008.1 SH EE T N UMB ER 0*00 DAISY CIRCLE C401 0,,.006.42 0+ .. 969. 4 GATE VALVE HYDRANT WATERM AIN WA TER SERVICE SANITA RY MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SERVICE STORM CATCH BASIN / OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE / FLARED END SECTION STOR M SEWER LEG END • • / • / Line A '10 FOOT ROAD EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 703617 AND 1243225 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET r SHED SANMH #107 RIM=1010.20 INV(SE)=1003.75 of 116Sfv 7/6/14 : SJ 4.'%9 •\ 8736 8736 / BLO CK 1 \\ wfo i 15 1004 WO 1012 STA . 2+16.0 (38') ELV= 1001. 0 8' BEND oG LY DRILLED U > *9 30-8"VC 25'-6' PVC RELO CATED SALVAGED HYDRANT 8 GA TE VALVE. 24'-8" PVC CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" WATERM AIN WTH LO NG SLEEVE 8 6' GV FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF EXISTING 8" WATERMAIN (6'+8" REDUCER). 1020 1015 1010 1005 1000 995 34'8" PVC -039% 8" W A7ERMA/N ST . 0+00 \- Vc• CON NECT TO AND EXTEND EXISTING\ SANITARY SEWER STUB. FIELD VERIFY EXISTING INVERT. CO NTACT \ ENGINEER IF DIFFERENT THAN IN DICA TED . EXISTING INV ERT = 1003. 62 S PROPOSED INVERT =1003.62 N REMOVE, SALVAG E 8 RELOCATE EXISTING HYDRANT 8 GATE VALVE. REMO VE 6' DIP BACK TO EXPOSE 8" DIP FO R CONNECTIO N. if r' Tii,3: 97-55 95 •°�- v:9• -� T.N. 1*33,16 ELV= 9960 STA 1+33. 16.(6 5') ELV= 998.0 SANMH#105 RIM=1010.081 INV (NE)=994.00 STA. 1+33.16 5 LV= 1001.0 f ` STA 0+00 00 \".• . . ELEV 1009.97 . / 7. 5 MIN COVER. 7.5' M IN CO VER \ \ . STA: 4+79.75 / ELEV: 1002. 60, -\ �- - - - - - 8' PVC TERMAIN \r f 7.5' MIN COVER TA. 1+ 80.08 ELEV: 993.56. 1+ 00 2+00 3+ 00 STA: 3+16.30' ' ELEV: 1002.50 4+00 LGE= 999 C STA 0+ 61.14(70') ELV= 996. 0 IS) LFE=1010 0 1 / F LFE=1001 WO STA. 0+ 21.83 (72' ) ELV= 998. 0 NMH #104 RIM=1 SW) 93 33. (E)= 9L33r STA 0+ 77. 64(20) ELV= 1001.5 SANMH #101 RIM=1010.26 INVISE)=993. 58 INV 92.70 INV( E)= 92.70 SLO LFE=1004. 6 It A 9/1 _ \ BLOCK 1 +' STA 0+i.39 ELV= 9985 STA 0+02.72. 2 ELV= 1002.0 SA NM H #102 •IM =1010.16 4.14 VNIM =•'4.14 RV • 41 0.50% STA. 1+ 29.181: V-1007.0 SANMH #103 RIM=1008.37 1NV(NVV)=995.00 CO NNECT TO EXISTING 8" WATERMAIN WITH LO NG syEEVE 8 8" GV FIELD VERIFY LOC ATION OF EXISTING 8" WATERM AIN (6"x8" REDUCER) I BUILD WATER TIGHT MANHO LE WITH WATER TIGHT FLEX IBLE BOOTS AT OVER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. FIELD VERIFY EXISTING INVERT. CO NTACT ENGINEER IF D IFFERENT THA N IND ICA TED. EXISTING INVERT = 973. 97 PROPO SED IN VERT = 974.47 SANMH #100 RIM=984.66 INV(SVV)=974.47 EXISTING SANITARY 1`8 LF X 0.43% \ 1 Rim: 005. 34. RELOCATED SALVAGED HYDRANT 8 GATE VALVE. STA ELV= 1+ 70.62 (68. •' \ -4 REM O • , SALVAGE 8 RELOCATE EXISTING "HYD RA NT 8 GA TE V ALVE. REMO VE 6' DIP CK TO EXPOSE 8" DIP FOR C ONNECTION . '-6" PVC NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR I5 SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCA TIO N A ND/O R ELEVATIO N OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COM PANIES AND, WH ERE PO SSIBLE, M EA SUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORM ATION IS NO T TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COM PLETE. THE CO NTRACTOR M UST CALL THE APPRO PRIATE UTILITY COM PANY AT LEA ST 48 HO URS BEFORE ANY EXCAVA TION TO REQUEST EXA CT FIELD LO CATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTO R TO RELOCATE A LL EXISTING UTILITIES WHIC H CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOVMJ ON THE PLANS. THE LOCA TIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRA CTOR , BY CA LLING GOPHER STATE ONE CA LL AT (651) 454-0002. 2. SA FETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTO RS: IN ACCO RDANCE WTH G ENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR SILL BE SOLELY AND C OMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR C OND ITIONS ON THE 008 SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORM ANCE OF THE WORK. TH IS REQUIREM ENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AN D NO T BE LIM ITED TO NO RMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENG INEER OR THE DEV ELOPER TO CO NDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CON TRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE A DEQUA CY OF TH E CONTRAC TOR'S SAFETY MEA SU RES IN , ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 3. ALL AREA S OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CO NSTRU CTION SHA LL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODD ED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WTH 61NCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED BENEATH THE SOD. 4. FINISHED GRADE IS THE CENTERLINE PROFILE. MANHOLE RIMS DEVIATE FRO M THE CENTERLINE ELEVA TION AS A RESULT OF THEIR OFFSET AND ARE S HOWN A CCORDING LY. 5. SEWE R SERVICE STATION SHOWN IS THE DISTANCE FROM D OWNSTREAM MANHOLE TO WE CON NECTION. 6 C ITY OF M EDINA STANDA RD DETAIL SPECIFICATIONS SH ALL GOVERN . FIm: 985.72 \m v 975. , SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN MATERIAL NOTES ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MO DIFIED HERIN. 1. ALL MATERIALS SHALL C OMPLY WTH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR-35 FROM 0'-18' DEEP, OR SDR-26 FROM >18' DEEP, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE . 3. 12 INCH WATERMAIN TO BE PVC C-900 DR14, AND 8 INCH WATERMAIN TO BE PVC C-900 DRIB WITH 7 .5 FEET MINIMUM COVER. ALL WATERMAIN SERVICES SHALL BE I INCH HDPE . ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES TO BE 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 . 6. NO PRIVATE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL CONNECT TO CITY OF MEDINA W ATERMAIN. ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNIN G EVS, INC . 10250 Valley View Road, Sutte 123 Eden Pr airie, Mi nn esot a 55344 Ph one: 952846-0236 Fax: www.evs- eng .com - en9 .Com ` 1 T V 0 R (C4 MEDINA City of M edina, MN 2052 C ou nty R oad 24 Medina, Minnesota 55340 Ph on e: 763-473-4643 Fax: 763-473-9359 www.ci.medina.mn .us FINAL PLAT PR OJ ECT WOODLAND HILL PRESERVE LOCATI ON MEDINA, MN SHE ET SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN PLAN & PROFILES # DAT E R EVISION I H EREBY CERTIFY TH AT"PHIS PLAN, SP ECIFI CATION, OR REPOR T W AS PREPARE D BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRE CT SUP ERVISION A ND TFI AT I AM A DUL Y LI CENSED PROF ESSIONA L ENGINEER UND ER TIIE LAWS OF THE ST ATE OF MINNESOT A. D avid N ash DATE 07/ 15/ 2014 RE GISTRATION NUMBER 21836 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY VN DJN D AT E PROJ ECT # 7.15.2014 2014-008.1 SH EET NUMBE R C502 PLANTING NOTES 1 ! Drainage and Utility Ens me at 7.‘" th-4/■IM4r ... PER DOG. N .,..0, 50 8736 7/11/14 96-4. .n 050 rL L FL1013. 74 _ _o _° _,V5"0,.. 0 <-��HS a ;HSHCtO ' O \\O 09 0 0 ° )_LOCI�P �, 0 0 0 \ 0 ° SHED 0 '0 \ 00 0 00 O 0 015 0 0 0 1004 yo 0 0 01 0 0C • 0 C0 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 0 \0 0 ._O M.1007. 4 1#61006. ! 10 0 0 00 0 7 4' 0 O 0 00 0 0 o 0 0 O 0 NAMINI A 1. ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS MATERIAL. FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASE AND BE CONTAINER GROWN OR BALLED AND BURLAPPEO AS INOICATED IN HE LANDSCAPE LEGEND. 2. ALL TREES MUST BE STRAIGHT 09056 5D AND FULL H EADED A ND MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED. 3. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES HE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PLANTS WHICH ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER INSTALLATION. 4. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVED IN WR ITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCH ITECT. 5. ALL PLA NTING STOCK SHA LL CON FORM TO TH E 'AM ERICA N STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK,' ANSI -Z60, LATEST EDITION, OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. INC. AND SHALL CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIALS. 6. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED TO THE DRIP LINE FROM A LL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, STORAGE OF MATERIALS ETC. NTH 4' HT. ORA NGE PLASTIC SAFETY FEN CING ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS 6' O. C. MAXIMUM SPACING, 7. ALL PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES, SHAPES OF BEDS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING BEDS AT SPACING SHOW N AND ADJUSTED TO CONFORM TO THE EXACT CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. HE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL A PPROVE HE STAKING LOCA TION OF ALL PLANT MA TERIA LS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. B. ALL TREES MUST BE PLANTED, MULCHED, AND STAKED AS SHOW N IN THE DETAILS. 99S..p ALL PLA NTING AREAS MUST BE COMPLETELY MULCHED A5 10.EMUCCH: SHREDDED HAROW000 MULCH, CLEAN AND FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL, IN ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS AND FOR TREES, UNLESS INDICATED AS ROCK MULCH ON DRANINGS. SUBMIT SAMPLE TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO DELVERY ON -SITE FOR APPROVAL. DELIVER MULCH ON DAY OF INSTALLATION. USE 4- FOR TREES, SHRUB BEDS, AND 3 - FOR PERENNIAL/GROUND COVER BEDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED. 11. THE PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST. HE SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLAN TING NOTES AND GENERAL NOTES. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORK SHOW N ON HE PLAN. VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND. 13. LONG-TERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON -SITE WILL NOT BE ALLOW ED. 14. HE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS, PLANTERS AND BUILDINGS CLEAN AND UNSTAINED. ALL PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE ACCESS TO BE MAINTANED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PERI00. ALL WASTES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE. ANY PLANT STOCK NOT PLANTED ON DAY OF DELIVERY SHALL BE HEELED IN AND WATERED UNTIL INSTALLATION. PLANTS NOT MAINTAINED IN THIS MANNER WILL BE REJECTED. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITI ES SHALL BE REPAVED AT THE CONTRACTOR' S EXPENSE. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPO NSIBLE FOR COMPLYING NH ALL APPUCABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE W ORK. 16. LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES. INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES. NTH THE OWNER FOR PROPRIETARY UTILITIES AND GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454-0002 (TAN CITES METRO AREA) OR B00-252-1166 (GREATER MINNESOTA) 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND REPAIR OF ANY DAMAGES TO SAME. NOTIFY HE LANDSCAPE ARCHITE CT OF ANY CONFLICTS TO FACIUTATE PLANT RELOCA TIO N. 17, USE ANT -DESICCANT (WILTPRUF OR APPROVED EQUAL) ON DECIDUOUS PLA NTS MOVED IN LEAF ANO FOR EVERGREENS MOVED ANYTIME. APPLY AS PER MANUFACTURER' S INSTRUCTION. ALL EVERGREENS SHALL BE SPRAYED IN HE LATE FALL FOR W INTER PROTECTION DURING WARRANTY PERIOD. 18. PLANTIN G SOIL FOR TREES, SHRUBS AN D GROUN D COV ERS: FERTILE FRIABLE LOAM CONTAINING A LIBERAL AM OUNT OF HUMUS AND CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING 0008005 PLANT GROWTH. IT SHALL COMPLY VON IAN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3877 TYPE B SELECT TOPSOIL. MIXTURE SHALL BE FREE FROM HAROPACK SUBSOIL. STONES. CHEMICALS, NOXIOUS WEEDS, ETC. SOIL MIXTURE SHALL HAVE A PH BETWEEN 6.1 AND 7. 5 AND 10-10-10 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF 3 POUNDS PER CUBIC YARD. IN PLANTING BEDS INCORPORATE THIS MIXTURE THROUGHOUT NE ENTIRE BED BY ROTOTILLING INTO THE TOP 12' OF SOIL. 19. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE COMPLETE GROWING SEASON (APRIL 1 - NOVEMBER 1). UNLESS OTHERW ISE SPECIFIED. HE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER NE FULL COST OF REPLACEMENT INCLUDING LABOR AND PLANTS. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNED DELIVERY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BEGINNING PLANT INSTALLATION. 21. SEASONS/TIME OF PLANTING: NOTE: HE CONTRACTOR M AY ELECT TO PLANT IN OFF-SEASONS ENTIRELY AT HIS/HER RISK. DECIDUOUS POTTED PLANTS: APRIL 1 -JUNE 1; AUG. 21-NOV. I DECIDUOUS MB: APRIL 1 -JUNE 1; AVG. 21-NOV , 1 EVERGREEN POTTED PLANTS: APRIL 1 -JUNE 1; AUG. 21-OCT. 1 EVERGREEN MB, APRIL 1-14 AY 15; AUG. 21-SEPT. 15 22. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMM EDIA TELY AFTER EA CH PORTION OF HE W ORK 15 IN PLACE. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF HE PLANTS IS COMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE, AND PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WATERING. CULTIVATING, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIALS, RE -SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, HE OW NER SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. HOWEVER. THE CONTRA CTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPON SIBLE FOR KEEPING NT TREES PLUMB THOVGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 23. ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES, TURNS BROWN, OR DEFOLIATES (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK) SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED WITH MATERIAL OF THE SAME SPECIES, OUANTTY. AND SIZE AND MEETING ALL LANDSCAPE LEGEND SPECIFICATIONS. 24. WATERING: MAINTAIN A WATERING SCHEDULE WHICH WILL THOROU GHLY WATER ALL PLANTS ONCE A WE EK. IN EXTREMELY HOT, DRY WEATHER, WATER MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS OF HEAT STRESS SUCH AS `MLTING LEAVES. CHECK MOISTURE UNDER MULCH PRIOR TO WATERING TO DETERMINE NEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE TH E NECESSARY A RRANGEMENTS FOR WATER. 25. CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN WR ITING, A FINAL ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION. 26. SEE SHEET 2.01 FOR PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 27. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED, ARE TO RECEIVE 4' TOP SOIL SEED, MULCH, ANO WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. 0 n 14 , 1. SCARIFY BOTTOM AN D SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLA NTING 2. TRI M OUT DEAD WOOD AN D WEAK ANDI OR DEF ORMED TAGS. DO NOT CUT A LEADER. DO NOT PAINT CUTS. 3. SET PL ANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR TH OROUGH LY CO MPACTED BACKFILL SOIL INSTALL PLANT 50 THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP T OT AB OVE THE FINISHED GRADE. 4. PUCE PLANT IN PU NTING HOLE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET. (IF USED). INTACT . 64056111 WITHIN APPR OXIMATELY IT OF TH E TOP OF ROOTBALL , WATER RANT. REMOVE TOP 10 OF THE BASKET OR TH E T OP TWO HO RIZO NTAL RI NGS, W HICHE VE RIS GRE ATE R. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FR OM T OP 113 OF THE BALL . REMOVE ALL WANE. 5. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH BACKFILL SOIL 6. WATER TO SETTLE PL ANTS AND FILL VOIDS . 7. WATER WINN TWO H OURS OF INSTALLATION, WATERING MUST BE SIFROENT TO TH OROUG HLY NSA ATTURATE ROOT BALL AND PLANTING e. RICE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECON D WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS E XCESSIVE. NOTE: GUY ASSE MBLY OPTIONAL B UT CONTRACTOR ASS UMES FULL RESPONSIMU TY FOR MAINTAI NING TREE IN A PLUMB POSITION FOR THE DURATION OF T HE GUARANTEE PERIOD GUY ASSEMBLY- 18 ' POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL) 1-12 ' WOE STRAP (TYP) DOUBLE STR AND 10 GA . IMRE, 2- T ROLLE D STEEL POSTS (MrDOT 3401) ®180' O.C. (SEE ST AKING DIAGRAM) COO RDI NATE STAKING TO INSURE UNIF ORM ORIENTATION OF U NES A ND ES STAKING DIAGRA M GUY VAR £ WITH W EBBING FLAG GING -O NE PER HARE PS SHREDDED BARK MULCH 212-.24' W000 STA KE SET AT ANGL E- STAKE TOP BELOW GRADE EXISTIN G GRADE MINIMUM 12 WIDT H CE ROOT BALL PLANTIN G SOIL MIXTURE (SEE SPEC ) z UNxTU9E0 OR STABILIZED SUBSOILS OC ONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NO SCALE PLAN 8' 2 -PLY RUBBER HOSE DOUBLE STRAND 12 GAUGE WIRE COVERED W/2 -PL Y RUBBER HOSE PAINTED FL CRESCENT ORANGE WHITE FLAGGING (PEP.) TREE WRAP 4 INCHES MULCH 4 INCH DEEP SAUCER 8' STEEL TEE P OST- 3 REQUIRED AT 120' 8 00651LL MIX UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL REMOVE BURLAP a ROPE FROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL NOTE: SEE PLANTING NOTES FOR THE TA PE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. 2 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NO SCALE LANDSCAPE LE GEND KEY BOT ANICAL NA ME COM MON NA ME aZE ROOT OTC . REMARKS OECI OUWS TREES rAce ha •'Green Mountain Sugar Maple a 02(60ars 2 .S 8B 7 ilk G allia occi2 81011s Hackberry 2.5 ' BB 6 • Tilia am ericana American Linden 2.5- 89 9 =/% Qu ercusrubra NORTHERN RED OAK 2 .S BB 8 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS/CALCULATIONS LAND SCA PE REQU IREMENTS TREES PER SF LOT 2 X 15 =30 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRON MENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC . 10250 Vall ey View R oad S uit e 123 Eden Prairie, Minnes ota 55344 Ph on e: 952646-0236 F ax 952-646-0290 www.evs- eng .c om MEDINA City 86 Medi na, MN 2052 County Road 24 Medina, Minnesota 55340 Ph one: 763-473-4643 Fax: 763-473-9359 www.cl.m edin a.mrt us FINAL PLAT P ROJECT WOODLAND HILL PRESERVE LOCATI ON MEDINA, MN SHEET LANDSCAPE PLAN # DATE REVISI ON I HEREB Y CERTIFY TH AT THIS P LAN, SPE CIFIC ATION, OR REPORT W AS PRE PARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRE CT SUP ERVISION AND TH AT I AM A DULY LI CENSED P ROFESSIONAL EN GIN EER UND ER THE LAWS OF TH E S TAT E OF MINNESO TA. D avid N ash DATE 07/ 111 2014 REGISTRATI ON NUMBER 21836 DRAWN BY DMS D AT E 7.11 .2014 CHEC KED BY DJN PROJ EC T # 2014-008.1 SHE ET N UMBE R L101 / to ti r • L• in e a 039-6368EMEN.LT 7 \ \ 703617 AND 120 8 z 58 14 9Se 4>.s 'Cr} �S-N 061'7 }}V5r5' Drain age and Utility Eas PER DOC. N0. 50 moot 8736 N89"43'00"W NO TES LEGEND 4.:. • 11 �'Srry-s. 9.00 N89' 52'551 r r- r � rI „ , I - : " H - 1� ll I II\ I /-\ l l am_ l 1 r. \ r— r\ sl 1 1. CALS TREE LOSS PER THIS ATTACHED PLAN. 2 CALS NET DENSITY FOR JUST WEST PARCEL. 3. 60' WOE LOT LAYOUT - JUST WEST PARCEL 1059.01 -963.3 0)91,1 DATA) `305900.;,• I I� CLEARIN G LI MITS. 'WETLAND BUFFER " SIGN (12 SHOWN) p ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC . 10025 Valley View Road, Suite 140 Eden Pr airi e, Mi nnes ot a 55344 Phone: 952-646-0236 F ax 952.646-0290 www. evs-e ng .c om \n ` 4 T Y O MEDINA City of Medina, MN 2052 C ounty Ro ad 24 Medin a, Minnesota 55340 Ph one: 763-473-4643 Fa x: 763-473-9359 www.ci.m edi na .m n.us FINAL PLAT PR OJ ECT WO ODL AND HILL PRESERVE ALTERN ATIVE LAYOUT L OC ATI ON MEDINA, MN SH EET SITE LAYOUT # D AT E R EVISION 1 H EREBY CER TIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SP ECIFI CATI ON, OR REPORT WAS PR EP ARED BY ME OR UND ER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIO N AN D THA T I AM A DUL Y LI CENSED PROFESSIONA L ENGINEER UN DER THE LAWS OF THE STAT E OF MI NNESO TA. Da vid Nash DAT E 09/ 04/2014 R EGISTR ATION NUMBER 21836 DRAWN BY CH EC KED BY VN DJN DAT E PR OJECT # 9 .4 .2014 2014-008 .1 SHEE T NUMBER 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET TREE REPLACEMENT WAIVER CALCULATIONS (ALT PLAN) Tag 8 Type Trees Caliper On.) Trees Removal 216 Oak 26 28 216 Oak 22 22 217 Bass wood 30 30 218 Oak 18 18 219 Mapl e 14 14 220 OW 10 10 221 Oak 22 22 222 Man t0 10 223 Oak 16 16 224 Basswood 16 18 225 Maple 10 10 226 Oak 24 24 227 Made 8 8 228 Maple 10 10 229 Maple 22 22 229a Maple 22 22 230 Ma ple 16 16 231 Maple 10 10 232 Maple 10 10 233 Basswo od 18 18 234 Maple 12 12 235 OW 20 20 236 Maple 16 16 237 Maple 22 22 238 Oak 24 24 239 Maple 15 15 239a Maple 15 15 240 Maple 14 14 241 Maple 8 8 242 Ma ple 8 8 243 Maple 14 14 244 Made 16 18 245 Basswood 18 18 246 Ma ple 10 10 247 Ma ps 16 16 248 Basswood 12 12 249 Made 16 18 250 OW 30 30 251 OW 25 25 252 Ma ple 15 253 Maple 12 254 Maple 12 12 255 Oak 24 256 Oak 24 257 OW 27 256 OW 24 259 Basswood 24 260 Elm 8 Tag . Typo Trees Caliper On. ) Tress Ramona 946 M aple 11 947 Maple 9 948 Maple 15 949 Mille 10 950 Ba sswo od 26 951 Maple 12 952 Basswood 48 953 Maple 14 954 ka p. 9 955 O sk 35 956 Basswood 11 957 Maple 11 958 Male 13 13 959 Bassw ood 18 18 980 Basswood 63 63 961 Mille 11 11 962 Oak 27 27 963 Made 9 9 954 Ba sswood 16 16 966 Butternut 10 10 966 Oak 42 42 967 Mille 8 8 968 Mille 18 18 969 M aple 9 9 970 Maple 9 9 971 Maple 10 10 972 Basswood 13 13 973 OW 13 13 974 Mills 8 8 976 Oak 25 25 976 M aple 9 9 977 Male 9 9 978 Maple 9 9 979 Mille 18 18 980 Maple 19 19 981 Oak 30 30 982 Maple 9 9 983 Bassw ood 17 17 984 Maple 8 8 986 M aple 14 14 988 Male 9 987 Maple 8 986 Maple 9 989 Bas swood 17 990 Maple 8 991 Maple 15 992 Maple 9 993 Mille 10 Te9 8 Type Tress Caliper (a.) Trees Rem oval 281 Oak 28 262 OW 18 263 Oak 22 264 Oak 22 265 Maple 10 268 Basswood 18 266a Basswood 18 268E Basswood 14 267 Maple 10 268 Oak 20 269 M ile 12 270 Ash 12 271 Map le 10 10 272 Ba sswood 18 272a Basswood 24 273 Mega 10 274 Mole 18 275 Maple 14 276 Maple 14 277 Mapl e 10 278 Mapl e 14 279 Maple 16 280 Map s 12 281 Map le 10 282 Bass wood 16 283 Maple 6 284 Maple 32 265 Maple 8 286 Basswood 36 38 267 Maple 14 288 Mods 14 289 Maple 8 290 Male 16 291 Ash 10 292 Bm 12 293 Basswood 20 294 Maple 12 295 Ash 24 296 Mad. 14 297 Maple 8 298 Maple 10 299 kapl. 12 300 Maple 16 16 301 Maple 12 302 M ade 16 16 303 Maple 8 304 Maple 18 Tag 8 Type Trees Ca per (a. ) Trees Removal 994 Elm 9 995 Made 9 996 Male 9 997 Maple 13 998 Elm 10 999 Miele 14 1000 OM 23 23 1201 OW 27 1202 Oak 19 1203 Maple 8 1204 OW 23 1205 Oa k 24 1206 Oa k 17 12070A 27 1208 OW 24 1209 OW 30 1210 OW 15 1211 Oak 16 12120W 36 1213 _ Mad. 12 1211 Maple 11 1215 Maple 12 1218 M aple 21 1217 ands 9 1218 OM 21 1219 OM 28 1220 Bassw ood 12 1221 Basswood 11 1222 Bassw ood 9 1223 Basswood 18 1224 Bassw ood 12 1225 Bassw ood 9 122616 Basswood 19 1227 Made 10 1228 Oak 18 1229 Bassw ood 16 1230 M aple 10 1231 Maple 12 1232 Maple 9 1233 Maple 13 1234 Bassw ood 21 1236 Elm 16 1236 Made 8 6 1237 Oak 12 12 1238 Maple 9 1239 Maple 9 1240 Maple 9 1241 Made 10 1242 Bassw ood 12 Tim* Type Trees Caper (In) Trees Removal 305 lade 18 306 Mode 12 307 Made 18 308 Maple 16 309 Maple 16 310 Maple 18 311 AM 14 311a Ash 12 311E Ash 12 312 Ash 12 313 Ash 8 314 Ash 12 315 Maple 16 316 Map s 22 317 Mina 14 318 Maple 14 319 Wig 12 320 Maple 16 321 Elm 24 24 322 OW 20 20 323 Ba sswood 18 324 Oak 28 28 325 OW 24 24 326 Oak 16 327 Mille 8 328 Oak 24 329 Oak 24 330 Maple 10 331 Bas swood 10 3310 Bess*Ood 14 331E Bass wood 40 332 OW 28 333 Ash 28 334 Maple 16 335 Elm 14 336 Maple 6 337 Ash 10 338 Oak 30 339 Elm 14 340 Oak 18 341 Oak 16 342 Celt 30 343 OW 20 344 Made 8 345 OW 12 346 Oak 30 347 oak 2a 348 Maple 12 349 Oak 34 34 T ai8 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1282 1283 1264 1265 1266 1267 1288 1289 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1263 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 TyW Bass wood Basswood Basswood Ids Maas Made Made hide Made Made Made Map. OW M od. OW Mad. M aple Elm OW Made OW Made Ba sswood Made Made Maps Male OW Maps Maps Made Male M ille Marla Maps Oak Mope M aple Made OW Basswood Oak Basswood Made Maps O ak M ade M ade Trees Caliper (a.) 18 18 16 25 12 8 9 12 10 11 11 10 40 12 24 10 11 9 20 22 29 8 13 9 9 9 13 20 10 9 12 10 11 8 18 28 9 12 10 25 11 20 19 11 13 20 11 14 Trees Removal Tag. Type Trees Caliper M•) Trees Removal 350 Made 8 8 351 Mepls 10 10 352 Made 8 353 Mad* 12 12 354 Made 8 355 Map le 10 10 356 0* 24 357 OW 30 30 358 Bass wood 10 358e Bass wood 10 358E Basswood 16 358c Bass wood 16 358d Bass wood 16 3580 Basswood 16 359 0* 46 46 380 Maple 14 361 Maple 8 6 362 Maple 12 12 363 EM 12 364 OW 46 365 Maple 12 366 OW 44 367 M aple 8 8 366 Oak 22 369 Maple 20 370 EM 8 371 Basswood 24 372 Maple 16 373 Maple 10 10 374 ► leas 18 18 375 kale 10 376 Maple 10 10 377 M en 10 10 378 Gads 12 12 379 Maple 12 12 380 Miele 12 12 381 Maple 12 12 362 Ash 12 383 Map le 8 384 Ash 14 385 Mile 8 386 Maple 20 20 387 610. 6 387a Maple 10 388 Maple 12 12 389 . Maple 16 16 390 _(wade 14 14 Teg 8 Type Trees Caton (in.) Trees Rem oval 1291 Oak 34 1292 R ap e 9 1293 Bass wood 12 1294 Maple 10 1295 Bass wood 28 1298 Maple 11 1297 Basswood 20 1298 Maps 9 1299 Mapl e 13 1300 Basswood 9 1186 Maple 20 1501 Basswood 8 1502 Bassw ood 16 1503 Cawood 22 1504 Maple 32 1505 Nape 10 1506110. 11 1507 Oak 34 1506 Bass wood 22 1509 Basswood 29 1510 Bass wood 9 1511 Made 20 1512 Maple 9 1513 Made 10 1514 Made 15 151511apns 9 1516 Maple 11 1517 Made 10 1518 E MI 8 1519 M aple 8 1520 Ash 16 1521 Maps 13 1522 Maple 11 1523 Nape 10 1524 Maps 16 1525 Mope 9 1526 Elm 9 1527 Maps 8 1528 Maple 12 1529 Maple 12 1830 Ash 24 1531 Oak 12 1532 Made 12 1533 Maple 12 1534 Made 9 1535 Meplp 10 1536 Basswood 17 1537 Ash 27 Tag a Type Trees Caliper (h.) Trees Removal 391_ Map4s 36 392 Maple 8 393 Mode 6 8 394 Maps 12 12 395 Elm 14 396 MpM 14 14 397 Mile 14 14 396 Maple 8 8 399 Maple 20 20 400 Mich 8 8 401 111 40 36 35 402 Ash 12 12 403 Maple 8 8 404 1ple 12 406 Maple 12 12 406 Mils 12 12 407 Made 16 408 Made 6 a 409 Boa Elder 12 410 Bass wood 12 12 4100 Basswood 24 24 411 Made 12 412 Maple 12 12 413 Mapl e 8 8 414 Ai de 16 16 415 Mtge 14 14 416 Mile 24 24 418 Maple 30 30 419 416 * 6 6 4190 Ekn 8 8 420 Mile 12 12 421 Ash 14 14 422 Ash 10 10 423 Mille 36 36 424 Made 36 35 425 Basswood 24 24 426 Maple 10 10 427 Marls 10 10 428 Map le 20 20 429 Mille 6 8 430 Maple 15 15 430a Mi le 24 24 431 Bass wood 15 15 431a Basswood 24 24 432 Oak 18 433 Maple 8 8 434 Calk 12 435 Oak 18 436 Made 8 8 Tag 0 Type Trees CNper (in .) Trees Removal 1538 Ash 12 1539 Ash 10 1540 Map s 13 1541 Maple 12 1542 Maple 23 1543 Maple a 1544 Mills 23 1545 Maple 16 1546 Maple 13 1547 Mode 12 1548 Maple 16 1549 M ade 18 1660 Made 16 1561 Maple 10 1552 Made 14 1563 M aple 15 1564 Maps 16 1555 Maps 9 1556 Made 16 1557 Bass wood 39 1558 Basswood 21 1559 Mods 19 1560 Mtge 16 1551 Mtge 14 1562 Maple 9 1563 Basswood 19 1564 Made 11 1565 Made 17 1566 M aple 23 1567 Male 13 1568 Male 10 1569 M ale 11 1570 Map le 9 1671 Mal. a 1572 Oak 27 1573 Maple 9 1574 Maple 19 1575 Made 9 1576 Maple 14 1577 M ade 17 1578 Maple 13 1579 M ade 12 1580 Made 14 1581 Maple 11 1582 Mad. 18 1583 Maple 20 1584 Made 8 1585 Maple 8 TREE INVENT ORY AND PRESERVATION TOTALS Tag 8 Type Tr ess Caliper On .) Trees Removal 437 Elm 20 438 1ple 16 439 Mods 16 440 Mode 12 441 Maple 10 442 Bass wood 28 443 Ash 28 444 Ash 28 445 Mole 8 446 Basswood 14 448e Bass wood 12 448E Basswood 8 447 Bass wood 12 448 Maple 22 449 Mp4e 12 450 Maple 20 451 Basswood 8 452 M da 14 453 Basswood 24 453a Basswood 24 454 Maple 16 Tag 8 Type Tress C *per (n.) Trees Removal 1586 Mad. 10 1587 Maple 9 1589 Maple 13 1589 Made 17 1590 OW 27 1591 Maple 19 1592 Bass wood 28 1593 Maple 21 1594 Maple 12 1595 Maple 11 1596 Maple 17 1597 Maple 24 1598 Maple 8 1599 Maple 9 1600 Maple 9 1801 Maple 29 1602 Maple 11 1603 Maple 16 1804 Os 31 1605 Maple 9 1606 Maple 16 1607 Maple 6 1608 Maple 21 1609 Male 17 1610 Male 20 1611 Maple 26 1612 Maple 15 1613 Maple 20 1614 Male 11 1615 Maple 12 1616 Male 14 1617 Maple 8 1618 Maple 20 1619 Maple 15 1620 Maple 14 1621 Maple 14 1622 Maple 19 1623 Male 9 1624 Maple 11 1625 Map le 9 1826 Maple 12 1627 Mad 9 1628 Maple 8 1629 Maple 8 1630 Maple 8 TOTAL EXISTING TREE CALIPER SURVEYE D TREE OFF -SITE TOTAL TREES ON SITE TREES SAVED - ON SITE ONLY TREE CALIPER REM OVAL- ON SITE O NLY % REMOVAL A LLO WED PER CITY CODE REQUIRED REPLACEMENT PER CODE 85691N 354 IN 821510 59401N 2275 IN 28 % 20% = 1643 IN 632 IN ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC. 10025 Valley View Road, Suite 140 Eden Prairie, Mi nnes ota 55344 Pho ne: 952-646-0238 F ax: 952-646-0290 www. evs- en9.00m c. 7 Y 0 MEDINA C oy of M edi na, MN 2052 Co unty R oad 24 M edin a, Minnesota 55340 Ph one: 763-473-4643 F ax: 763-473-9359 www. a.medi na.mn .us FINAL PL AT PR OJECT WOODLAND HILL PRESERVE ALTERNATIVE LAYOUT LOCATI ON MEDINA, MN S HEET TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN # DAT E RE VISION I HEREB Y CER TIF Y TH AT THIS PLAN, SPE CIFICA TIO N, OR REPORT WAS PREPAR ED BY ME OR UN DE R MY DI REC T S UP ERVISION AND TH AT I AM A DULY LI CENSED P ROFESSIONAL EN GIN EER UNDER THE LAWS OF TH E S TAT E OF MINNESO TA. David Nash DATE 09/ 04/ 2014 REGISTR ATION N UMB ER 21836 DRAWN BY CH EC KE D BY VN DJN DAT E PROJ ECT # 9 .4 .2014 2014-008 .1 SHEE T N UMBE R TREE REPLACE MENT WAIVER CALCULATIONS (ALT PLAN) 4 ScAory,144edi a+ MEMO ENGINEERING I SURVEYING I ENVIRONMENTAL I PLANNING 10025 Valley View Road, Suite 140, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone 952.646.0236 Fax: 952.646.0290 www.evs-eng.com From: To: Date: Project : RE: David Nash, PE Medina Planning Commission Members September 9, 2014 Woodland Hill Preserve - Single Family Residential Medina Planning Commission Meeting Charles Cudd Denovo is asking for Woodland Hill Preserve tree replacement requirement to be a total of 379", based on the following data and calculations. To arrive at our tree replacement calculation we took the entire Woodland Hill Preserve site and broke it down into two separate parcels. The first being the original approved Fawn Meadows Preliminary Plat and the second parcel being the wooded Nelson property. Fawn Meadows was previously approved with a total of 194" of tree replacement. If the Nelson property were developed separately under an alternative plan with 8 lots, 60 foot wide, the required tree removal is 2662 ", or over 61% of the trees. In summary the tree removal totals for Fawn Meadows and Nelson property combined is 3902" of trees. The total tree removal for our proposed Woodland Hill Preserve plan is 4087" of trees. The difference between these two options is 185". Combing this amount with the original approved replacement amount for Fawn Meadows bring the total tree replacement to 379". A. Original Fawn Meadows site 1. Total Trees on site 2. Total Removed 3. % Removal B. C. Nelson Property only ( Net Buildable Area = 3.62 Ac) 1. Total Trees on site 2. Total Removed 3. % Removed Total A & B (Fawn 1. Total Trees =8209" (3900' + 4309") 2. Total Removed =3902" (1240" + 2662") 3. % Removed =47.5% Per our Final Tree Inventory & Preservation Plan (Woodland Hill Preserve 1. Total Trees =8215" 2. Total Removed =4087" 3. % Removal =49.7% Comparison for replacement quantity 1. Trees Removed — Alternative plan 2. Trees Removed — Woodland Hill Preserve 3. Difference — required tree replacement 4087"-3902" replacement amount was 194") 4. Total Proposed Replacement Meadows) = 379" =3900" =1240" =31.8% Meadows and Nelson Property) =4315" =2662" =61.7% - C102) =3902" =4087" =185" (Fawn Meadow =185" + 194" ( From Fawn 1 Ue8 R0A6 703617 AND 12 —T— ILL J Draina ge an d Utility Eas emen t PER DOC. N0. 50 8736 / Sb � /1859 J �- 1886—Y\ 959 BLOCK 1 \ 1 7 90' MIN. LOT WIDTH LOT NUMBER 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK SUGG ESTED G ARAGE LOCATION G ARAGE ELEV IF STEPS REQ UIRED FINISHED GRO UND ELEVATION — 125' MIN. DEPTH ROW LINE SANITARY SERVICE SHALL BE SET DOWN STREAM OF WATER SERVICE A CCO RD ING TO DIRECTION OF SANITARY M AINLINE FLOW 15 / 4 / 1 11 10 L _1 30' REAR YARD SETBACK (TYP.) 15' SIDE YARD SETBACK G RO UND ELEVATION LO WEST FLOOR ELEVATION STRUCTURE TYPE (SEE BELOW BUILDING PAD NO. OF STEPS (IF REQUIRED) GRADE AT FRON T OF HOUSE 25' FRONT YA RD SETBACK (30' FOR GARAGES) R = RAMBLER. GRA DED FOR S' DEFERENCE FROM THE BASEMEN T FLOOR ELEVATIO N TO FRONT GRADE ELEVATION AT GARAGE. LO = FULL BA SEMENT LO OKOUT, SIDE LO OKOU T. G RA DED FOR SP' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE LOOKOU T GRADE ELEVATIO N TO FRONT GRADE ELEV ATION AT GARAGE WO = FULL BASEMENT WA LKOU T, SIDE WALKOUT. GRADED FOR Y OF DEFEREN CE FROM THE BASEM ENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GRADE ELEVA TIO N AT GARA GE. S = SIDE C = CUSTOM (1) • 1 STEP (0 6') UP FR OM GA RAG E FLO OR ELEVA TIO N TO FIRST FLO OR ELEVA TION. (2)=2 STEPS (1. 2) UP FROM GARAGE FLOOR ELEVA TIO N TO FIRST FLOOR ELEVA TION. LFE•1001 LFE•1000 SWO G 1018 L _BLOCK 1 NOTES S LO LEEK -1008. 6 1 ALL DIMENSIO NS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. BLOCK 1 2 2 ALL DIM ENSIONS ARE BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. BACK OF CURB IS SHOWN GRAPH IC ALLY ONLY 3 STREET NAMES A RE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 4 DRAINAG E AND UTILITY EASEM ENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS R EQUIRED. DRAINAG E AND UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED OVER ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES AND UP TO ONE (1) FOO T A BO VE THE HIGH WATER LEVEL OF ALL PONDS WETLAND BUFFER AVERAGING LO T 8 (IMPACT)- . BUFFER WIDTH REDUCED TO 21 4 FT BUFFER AREA REDUCED BY 732 FT SF LOT 6& 7 (MITIGATION). BUFFER WIDTH INCREASED TO 366 FT BUFFER AREA REDUCED BY 733 FT SF 4RND 011111,963.15 PA DATA) V SINGLE FAMILY SITE DEVELOPMENT SU MMARY LOT SUMMARY MINIMUM LOT SIZE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH MINIMUM LOT DEPTH MAXIMUM I MPERVIOUS C OVERAGE NUMBER OF L OTS SETBACKS FRONT YARD FOR GAR AGE DOORS FACING STREET F OR SIDE -L OAD GARAGE SIDE YARD REAR YARD AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER MINI MUM W ETLAND BUFFER MINIMUM WETLAND SETBACK II 11 LEGEND 11,000 SF 90 FT 100 FT 40% OF TOTAL LOT ARE A 15 UNITS 25 FT 30 FT 20 FT 25 FT TOTAL (MIN 10 FT ON ONE SIDE) 30 FT 30 FT 20 FT 15 FT EXISTING ZONING RURAL RESIDENTIAL (URBAN RESERVE) PROPOSED ZO NING SIN GLE FA MILY RESIDENTIAL R-1 STREET LIGHT (TBD) "WETLAND BUFFER" SIGN (12 SHOWN) MONUMENT SI GN ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, IN C. 10025 Valley View R oad, Suit e 140 Eden Pr airie, Minnesota 55344 Plane: 952-646-0236 Fax: 952-646-0290 www.evw eng.com MEDINA City o1 Medina, MN 2052 C ounty R oad 24 Medina, Mi nnes ota 55340 Pho ne: 763-473-4643 F ax: 763-473-9359 ww . '.medinam n. us FINAL PLAT P ROJ ECT WOODLAND HILL PRESERVE LOCATION MEDINA, MN SHEET _ ., .. # DAT E REVISI ON A 08/15/2014 GRADIN G & UTILITIES B 08/182014 W ATERSHED COMME NTS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY TIIAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFI CATI ON, OR REPORT WAS PREP ARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIO N AND TIIAT I AM A DU LY LI CENSED PR OFE SSI ONAL, F ,NCINE ER TINDER THE LAWS OF THE STA TE OF MINNESOTA . D avid Nash DAT E 07/ 15/ 2014 REGIST RATION NUMBER 21836 DRAWN BY CH EC KED BY VN DJN DATE PROJ ECT # 7 .15 .2014 2014-008 .1 TYPICAL LOT 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET SHEET NUM BER C201 Tao 8 Type Trees C0'p er (in ) Des Ca1Der Renwel 216 O ak 28 216 O ak 22 22 217 Basswood 30 218 Oak 18 218_ Maple 14 14 220 Oak 10 10 221 Oak 22 22 222 M aple 10 10 223 Oak 18 16 224 Basswo od 16 18 225 Maple 10 10 226 Oak 24 24 227 Maple 6 8 228 Maple 10 10 ?29 Maps 22 22 229a 1 844414 22 22 230 Map*, 16 16 231 *ewe 10 10 232 We 10 10 233 Basswood ! 18 18 234 Maps 12 12 235 O ak 20 20 236 Maple 16 16 237 Ma ple 22 22 236 Oa k 24 24 239 8.484* 15 15 239. Mope 15 15 240 14 14 _Ma* 241 M aple 8 8 242 Mate 6 8 243 Merle 14 14 244 Maple 16 16 245 Basswood 18 18 246 Mode 10 10 247 Maple 16 16 248 Basswood - 12 12 249 Maple I 18 18 250 Oak 1 30 30 251 Oak 25 25 252 Mole 16 15 253 Mole 12 12 254 Maple 12 12 255 Oak 24 24 256 Oak 24 24 257 O ak 27 258 Oak I 24 259 Bassw ood 24 28 280 Elmo _ Si 4 Type Imes Capper (in. ) 'Trees Capper Remodel 445 Maple 8 offs/. 448 Bassw ood 14 castle 448, Basswood 12 dlsle 4489 Basswood 8 ollde 447 Basswood 12 off 08, 448 Maple 22 o8 sae 440 Maple 12 pRsle 460 14541e 20 oeste 151 Basswood 8 06580 452 Made 14 0861, 453 Bassw ood 24 *lisle 4534 Basswood 24 disk 464 1a81e 16 off sle Tap; Type Trees *per (n.) Taos C elperRe molW 281 Oak 26 262 Oak 18 283 Oak 22 264 Oak 22 218.J.____.8 266 IM 10 Basswood 18 2886 Basswood 18 2866 Ba06W00d 14 287 la de 10 288 0* 20 280 18 41. 12 270 Pah 12 271 klade 10 272 Basswood 18 272a Basswood 24 273 layle 10 274 ktade 16 16 275 18 41. 14 276 Ma ple 14 277 Mope 10 278 Maple 14 270 Wage 16 250 Mad. 12 281 Wage 10 282 Basswood 16 283 W imple 8 284 Maple 32 285 Wade 8 286 Basswood 36 287 Maple 14 286 Maple 14 289 /aye 8 280 Made 16 291 Ash 10 292 Ekn 12 293 Basswood 20 294 Wage 12 295 Ash 24 296 Made 14 207 Made 8 298 *ape 10 299 klede 12 300 Mad, 16 301 ______4 302 12 ___ la de 16 303 lade 8 304 Wpm 18 305 Made 18 306 Maple 12 307 Ma de 16 a9 4 Type -Trees Caipr (h. )' Tlees Capper Removal 386 Maple 16 309 *Pie 18 310 Maple 18 311 Ash 14 3118 Ash 12 311h Ash 12 312 Ash 12 313 Ash 8 314 Ash 12 315 Maple 18 316 Maple 22 317 Maple 14 318 Map* 14 319 8.1646 12 320 321 M aple Eon 16 24 322 Oak 20 _ 323 Basswood 18 324 0811 28 325 0* 24 326 0* 18 327 Mad. 8 328 Oak 24 328 Oak 24 330 Made 10 331 Basswood 10 3314 Basswood 14 33111 Brawo4d 40 332 Oak 28 393 Ash 28 334 Maps 16 335 EM 14 336 M aple B 337 338 Ash 0* 10 30 339 EM 14 340 Oak 18 341 Oak 16 342 Oak 30 343 0* 20 344 Ma ps 8 345 O ak 12 346 Oak 30 347 Oak 28 348 Maple 12 349 Oak 34 34 350 Maple 8 8 351 Maple 10 10 352 Maps 8 363 610*, 12 12 744 4 Type Tre es Calp er pas. ) Trees Colter Removal 354 Maple 5 355 Mega 10 10 356 0* 24 257 Oak 30 30 358 Basswo od 10 3558 Bassw ood 10 3586 Bassw ood 16 3580 Basswood 16 358d Bles wo d 16 361. Bas0W000 16 359 Oak 46 46 360 We 14 331 862 I41Ple M aple 8 12 8 12 363 Elm 12 364 Oak 46 365 386 We Oak 12 44 367 Maple 8 8 399 Oak 22 389 lope 20 370 Elm 8 371 - Bassw ood 24 372 kasha 18 373 M ad. 10 10 374 1.14414 18 18 375 888 1. 10 378 Who 10 10 377 Wade 10 10 378 6.810 12 12 379 Maple 12 12 310 381 Maple 8.8.818 12 12 52 12 382 Ash/ 12 ,. __ _._ 383 "Agile8 314 385 A410 kept* 14 8 386 Maple 20 387 148810 6 3878 Maps 10 388 jMaps 12 12 389 Maple 16 16 380 Maple 14 14 391 Maps 36 392 Wa de 8 8 383 Maps 8 8 304 M ass 12 12 395 Bm 14 396 Maple 14 14 397 Maps N 14 To 4 Type Trees Carps On.) Tian Caper Removal 396 8.1,44. 8 8 399 144414 20 20 400 ape 8 6 401 1,14414 35 35 402 Ash 12 12 403 141414 8 8 .404 Ro e 12 405 Maple 12 12 406 Maple 12 12 407 M op e 16 466 Sage 8 a 409 Bow Elder 12 410 4108 Bassw ood Basswood 12 24 12 411 12 _IIl8 412 Maple12 12 413 414 31408 Sage 8 16 8 16 416 kople 14 14 416 M ade 24 24 418 Made 30 30 /118 Bre 6 6 419. Eke 8 420 Made 12 12 421 Ash 14 14 422 Ash 10 10 423 M erle 35 35 424 1181e 95 35 42:5 84651004 24 24 426 Made 10 10 427 8o4e 10 10 428 429 140(48 Made 20 8 20 6 430 Made 15 15 Me Made 24 24 431 431a 9osw oo d Basswoo d 16 24 16 24 432 0* 18 18 433 816114. 8 8 434 O .8. 12 Oslo 436 oak 18 off see 436 Mode 8 6 437 Elm 20 06 she 433 M ode 45 439 M ade 16 o889. 440 Mode 12 441 Made 10 off she 442 Bass wood 28 o8414 443 Ash 28 dl sae 444 Ash 28 06ste TREE INVENT ORY AND PRESERVATION TOTALS TOTAL EXISTING TREES SURVEYED TREES OFF•SITE TOTAL TREES ON -SITE A VED—01. .. •i ALLOWED PER CITY CODE REQUIRED REPLACEMENT PER CODE • TREE REPL ACEMENT WAIVER REQUESTED 8569" 354 " 8215" 20 % = 1643 " 2444" ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVB, INC. 10026 Wl1ey View Road, Sale 140 Eden Park, Minnes ota 05344 Phone: 062646 -0236 Few: 052.464250 www.eysea0 .0om MEDINA City or Ma6re, MN 2032 C ounty Ro ad 24 Medina, Manacle 05340 Priem:763 .473-4543 Fa: 7637341399 vnmv ei.medina.m nUs FINAL PLAT PROJECT LOCATI ON MEDINA, MN S HEET # DATE RE VISION A 04'15 2014 GRADINGIIJTII1 DES 0 0 016,2014 WATERSHED COMMENTS PROPERTY AND TREE SURVEY PERFOR MED BY DEMARS-GABRIEL LAND SURVEYO RS, INC. , DATED 2/17/06 AND BY ACRE LANG SURVEY, INC., DATED 07/08/14 1 HER ESY CERTIFY TH AT THIS PLA N, SPECIFI CATION, 011 R EPORT PAS PREPARED HY MP. OR UNDER MY DIR EC T S UP ER VISI ON A ND T HAT 1 AM A DULY LI CENSE D PR OFESSI ONAL. ENGI NEER U NDER 7110/ ZAPS OF THE STATE , OF MI NNISO'TA- D.vld Nash DATE 07118/ 2014 R EGIS TR ATI ON NUMBER 21636 DR AWN CHECKED BY VN DJN DATE P ROJE CT 7 .16 .2014 2014-008.1 S HEET NUMBER C102 N89°43'00"W 1059. 01 .44 Dra inage an d Utility Ea sement Ep. PER DOC. NO. 5078736 7(eh ►v* — --- rstsi, A BA9 703617 AND 12 rs esysy z se 're s9B'j" rA, Ersu 1486 5 .5„« 0,5.E N6 S 55, 0:s, e €:s,s @, vs 63.72 4412 562 63565 X52, 6r, 636°, 86 " �� O. 605 63645 m,6ra is 16 16 �'rsae er 60 3 gsrs eV ara,6o2 e6a ,6,t, X62° 6 21 ilk 1t11U10 (OIR DATA) A. / / / .- e e, 4 — •-�,..,.�. ter, \ \ / '� .144 O6 .. f."*iN-66'\, \ / :'' .50,f .e zB ——1.—G..2e \ \ /A._ d � n r� o F \ �4a ° 15 / r / �! B,' p` �'� 0,e ,ozo �N N \4\ \ �t OszFr. .. / �.3.M. a °,6 ° o' \ % 4\ o' \ 1 \ 4\ \ 14626 e- \_1"- 06. "60 -0 , „ 0,0 E.5r5 °5 0„ 0„0„ c2,2 /7 N89°52'55' W 1 1 jj, ilk NO TES 1 GALS TREE LO SS PER THIS ATTACHED PLAN. 2 GA LS NET DENSITY FOR JUST WEST PARCEL. 3. 60' WIDE LO T LAYO UT - JUST WEST PARCEL. DENSITY CA LS-N ELSO N PRO PERTY GRO SS AREA LESS WETLAND NET AREA NUM BER OF UNITS (2U/A) 6.31 AC 269 AC 3 .62 AC 7.24 UNITS - o. .; .9 059:'UO„ 0 LEGEND 274 0 e 4. .y 4je d" o„ \\ ll 4155 \ — ,. ,559 CLEARING LIMITS. "WETLAND BUFFER" SIGN (12 SH OWN) 0 00 M 1 I1N ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC. 10025 Valley View Road, S uit e 140 Eden Pr airie, Minne sot a 55344 Pho ne: 952 .646-0236 Fax: 952-646-0290 www. evsang.c om G 1 T Y O A • MEDINA City of Medina, MN 2052 County Road 24 Medi na, Mi nnes ota 55340 Plane: 763-473-4643 F.: 763-473-9359 www .cl.m edina.m n. us FINAL PLAT PR OJECT WOODL AND HILL PRESERVE ALTERNATIVE LAYOUT L OCATION MEDINA, MN SH EET # DATE RE VISION 1 HER EBY CER TIFY THAT T HIS PLAN, SPE CIFI CA TION, OR REPOR T WAS PR EPARED BY ME OR UN DE R MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DU LY LICENS ED PROFESSION AL ENGINEER UN DER TH E LAWS OF T HE STA TE OF MINNESO TA. David Nash DA TE 091041 2614 REGIS TRA TION NUMBER 21836 D RAWN BY CH ECKED BY VN DJN D AT E P ROJ ECT # 9 .4.2014 2014-008.1 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET SH EE T NUMBE R Alt B-1 Tag # Type Caliper (in.) Trees Re mo val 946 M aple 11 947 M aple 9 948 Maple 15 949 Maple 10 950 Basswood 26 26 951 Maple 12 12 952 Basswood 48 48 953 Maple 14 14 954 Maple 9 9 955 O ak 35 35 956 Basswood 11 11 957 Maple 11 11 958 Maple 13 13 959 Basswood 18 18 960 Basswoo d 63 63 961 Maple 11 11 962 08k 27 27 963 Maple 9 9 964 Basswood 16 16 965 Butternut 10 10 966 Oak 42 42 967 Maple 8 8 968 Maple 18 18 969 Ma ple 9 9 970 M aple 9 9 971 Ma ple 10 10 972 Basswood 13 13 973 Oak 13 13 974 Maple 8 8 975 Oak 25 25 976 Maple 9 9 977 Maple 9 9 978 M aple 9 9 979 Maple 18 18 980 Maple 19 19 981 Oak 30 30 982 Ma ple 9 9 983 Basswood 17 17 964 Maple 8 965 Maple 14 986 Ma ple 9 987 Maple 8 988 Maple 9 989 Bass wood 17 990 Maple 8 991 Maple 15 992 Maple 9 993 Maple 10 Tag # Type Caliper (M. ) Trees Remova l 994 Elm 9 995 M aple 9 996 Maple 9 9 997 Ma ple 13 13 998 Ekn 10 10 999 Maple 14 14 1000 O ak 23 23 1201 Oak 27 27 1202 Oak 19 19 1203 Maple 8 8 1204 O ak 23 23 1205 Oak 24 24 1206 Oak 17 17 1207 Oak 27 27 1208 Oak 24 24 1209 O ak 30 30 1210 Oak 15 15 1211 Oak 16 1212 Oak 36 1213 M aple 12 1214 Maple 11 11 1215 Ma ple 12 1216 Maple 21 1217 M aple 9 1218 Oak 21 21 1219 O ak 28 28 1220 Basswood 12 12 1221 Basswood 11 11 1222 Basswood 9 9 1223 Basswood 18 18 1224 Basswood 12 12 1225 Basswood 9 9 1226 Basswood 19 19 1227 Maple 10 10 1228 Oak 18 18 1229 Basswood 16 16 1230 Maple 10 1231 Maple 12 1232 M aple 9 9 1233 Maple 13 13 1234 Basswood 21 21 1235 Elm 16 18 1236 Maple 8 8 1237 Oa k 12 12 1238 Maple 9 9 1239 M aple 9 9 1240 M aple 9 9 1241 M aple 10 10 1242 Basswo od 12 12 1243 Basswood 18 18 1244 Basswood 18 18 Tag # Type Caber (in. ) Trees Removal 1245 Basswood 18 1248 Maple 25 1247 Maple 12 1248 M aple 8 1249 Maple 9 9 1250 M aple 12 12 1251 Maple 10 1252 Maple 11 1253 Ma ple 11 1254 Maple 10 1255 Oa k 40 1256 Maple 12 1257 O ak 24 24 1258 Maple 10 1259 Maple 11 1260 Ell 9 1261 O ak 20 20 1262 Maple 22 22 1263 Oak 29 29 1264 Maple 8 8 1265 Basswood 13 13 1266 Ma ple 9 9 1267 Maple 9 9 1268 Wple 9 9 1269 Maple 13 13 1270 Oak 20 20 1271 Maple 10 10 1272 Ma ple 9 9 1273 Maple 12 12 1274 Maple 10 10 1275 Maple 11 11 1276 Ma ple 8 8 1277 Maple 18 18 1278 Oak 28 28 1279 Maple 9 9 1280 Maple 12 12 1281 Ma ple 10 10 1282 O ak 25 25 1283 Basswood 11 11 1284 O ak 29 29 1285 Basswood 19 19 1286 M aple 11 11 1287 M aple 13 13 1288 Oa k 20 20 1289 Maple 11 11 1290 Maple 14 14 1291 Oak 34 34 Tag 6 Type Ca liper (M. ) Trees Removal 1292 M aple 9 1293 Basswood 12 12 1294 M aple 10 10 1295 Basswood 28 28 1296 M aple: 11 11 1297 Basswood 20 20 1298 Maple 9 9 1299 Maple 13 13 1300 Ba sswood 9 9 14861600 20 1501 Basswood 8 8 1502 Basswood 16 16 1503 Basswood 22 22 1504 M aple 32 32 1505 Maple 10 10 1506 Maple 11 11 1507 Oak 34 34 1508 Ba sswood 22 22 1509 Basswood 29 29 1510 Basswood 9 9 1511 Ma ple 20 20 1512 Maple 9 9 1513 Maple 10 1514 Maple 15 1515 Maple 9 1516 Maple 11 11 1517 Maple 10 10 1518 Elm 8 1519 Maple 8 8 1520 Ash 16 1521 Maple 13 13 1522 Maple 11 11 1523 Maple 10 10 1524 Maple 15 15 1525 M aple 9 9 1526 Ekn 9 9 1527 Maple 8 1528 Maple 12 12 1529 Maple 12 12 1530 Ash 24 24 1531 Oa k 12 1532 Maple 12 1533 M aple 12 1534 Maple 9 1535 Maple 10 1538 Basswood 17 1537 Ash 27 1538 Ash 12 1539 Ash 10 1540 Maple 13 Tag* Type Caliper (M. ) Trees Removal 1541 Maple 12 1542 Ab ple 23 1543 Maple 8 1544 Maple 23 1545 Maple 16 1548 Maple 13 1547 Maple 12 1548 M6pk: 16 1549 Maple 18 155016 ple 16 1551 Maple 10 1552 Maple 14 1553 Maple 15 1554 Ma ple 16 1555 Wple 9 1556 Maple 16 1557 Basswood 39 39 1558 Basswood 21 21 1559 Maple 19 19 1560 Maple 18 18 1561 Maple 14 14 1562 Maple 9 9 1563 Basswood 19 19 1584 Maple 11 1565 Maple 17 1566 Maple 23 1587 M aple 13 1568 Maple 10 1569 Maple 11 1570 M6pk 9 1571 Maple 8 1572 O ak 27 1573 Maple 9 1574 Maple 19 1575 Maple 9 1576 Maple 14 1577 Maple 17 1578 Maple 13 1578 Maple 12 12 1580 Maple 14 14 1581 Maple 11 11 1582 Maple 18 18 1583 M aple 20 20 1584 Maple 8 8 1585 Maple 8 8 1586 Maple 10 10 1587 Maple 9 9 1588 Maple 13 13 1589 Maple 17 17 1590 Oa k 27 1591 Maple 19 19 Tag* Type Caliper (in.) Tree s Removal 1592 Basswo od 28 28 1593 Maple 21 21 1594 Maple 12 12 1595 Maple 11 11 1596 Maple 17 17 1597 M aple 24 1598 Maple 8 1599 Maple: 9 1600 Maple 9 1601 Ma ple 29 1602 Maple 11 1603 Maple 16 1604 Oak 31 1605 Maple: 9 1606 Maple 16 1607 Maple 8 1608 Maeda 21 1609 Maple 17 1610 Maple 20 1611 Maple 26 1612 Ma ple 15 1613 Maple 20 1814 Maple 11 1815 Maple 12 1616 Maple 14 1817 Ma ps 8 1618 Maple 20 1619 Maple 15 1620 Maple 14 1821 Wpk 14 1622 Maple 19 1823 M aple 9 9 1624 Maple 11 11 1625 Ma ple 9 9 1626 Maple 12 1827 Wple 9 1628 Ma ple 8 1629 Maple 8 1630 Ma ple 8 TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION T OTALS ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING E VS, I NC. 10025 Valley Vi ew Ro ad, Suite 140 Eden Pr airie, Min nes ota 55344 Ph one: 952.646-0236 Fes: 952846-0290 www .evseng.c om L1 T 04• MEDINA City o/ M edina, MN 2052 Cou nty Road 24 Medi na, Mi nnesota 55340 Pho ne: 763-473-4643 Fax: 763-473-9359 www. ci.m edi na,mn.us FINAL PLAT PROJ ECT WOODLAND HILL PRESERVE ALTERNATIVE LAYOUT LOCATION MEDIN A, MN SH EET TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERV ATI ON PLAN # DAT E REVISION I IIEREBY C ERTIFY T}IA T THIS PIAN, SPECIFI CA TION, OR REP ORT WAS PREPAR ED BY ME OR U NDER MY DI RECT SUPERVISI ON ANI) THAT 1 AM A D ULY LI CENSED PROFESSIO NAL ENGI NEER TI NDER TH E LAWS OF HIE S TA TE OF MINNESOTA. Da vid Nash DATE 09/04/2014 RE GIST RATION NUMB ER 21836 D RAW N BY CH ECKED BY VN DJN D ATE PR OJ ECT # 9.4.2014 2014-008 .1 SHEET N UMBER Alt B-2 SIGNIFICANT TREES TO BE REMOVED 215 216 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 2296 230 231 292 234 235 238 240 241 242 270 271 272 272a 273 274 275 276 277 904 310 321 322 323 324 325 327 398 398 400 401 403 406 408 410 410a 412 413 O ak Oa k Maple Oak Oak Maple Oak Basswood Maple Oak Maple Maple Maple Maple Maple Ma ple Ma ple Maple Oak Maple Maple Maple M aple Ash M aple Basswo od Basswood M aple M aple Maple Maple Maple Maple M aple Elm O ak Ba sswo od Oak Oak Maple Maple Maple Maple Ma ple Maple Maple Maple Basswood Basswoo d Maple Maple 28" 27 14" 10' 22' 10" 16" 16" 10" 24' 8" 10" 22' 22' 18" 10' 10" 17 20" 16" 14" 6" 8" 17 10' 18' 24" 10' 16" 14" 14' 10" 18' 22' 24" 20' 18' 28' 24" 8" 14' 8" 8" 35' 8' 17 8" 17 24' 12" 8" 414 4 15 416 418 419 4196 420 421 422 424 426 427 428 429 430 4308 431 431a 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 TOTAL REMOVED 124C - Maple Maple Maple Maple Eip Elea M aple Ash Ash Maple Ma ple Maple Maple M aple Maple Maple Bas swood Ba sswoo d Maple Oak O ak Maple Elm Maple Maple 1460 18 Maple 16" 14" 24" 30" 6" 8" 12' 14" 10" 35- 10' 10' 20" 8" 15" 24' 15" 24" 8" 17 18' 8" 20' 48' 18" 12" 10" SIGNIFICANT TREES TO BE SAVED 217 Basswood 218 233 237 238 239 239a 243 244 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 245 255 256 257 258 259 280 261 262 263 264 285 266 2686 2888 287 268 209 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 288 289 200 291 202 293 294 30" 18" 18" 22" 24" 15" 15" 14" 16" 10" 18" 12' 18" 30" 25' 15" 12" 12" 18" 24" 24" 27" 24' 24" 8" 28" 18' 22' 27 10" 18" 18" 14" 10" 20' 12" 14" 18' 12' 10" 16" 8" 32' Oak Basswood Maple Oak Maple M aple Ma ple M dpie M aple Maple Bassw ood Maple Oak Oak M aple Maple Maple Bassw ood Oak Oak Oak O ak Bass woo d Elm Oa k Oak O ak Oak Maple Basswood Basswood Basswoo d Maple Oa k M aple Maple Maple Ma ple Maple Basswood Made Ma ple M aple 8" Maple Maple Made Ash Elm Basswoo d Made 14" 8" 16" 10' 17 20" 12" 295 298 297 298 290 900 301 302 303 305 308 307 308 309 310 311 311a 311b 312 313 314 315 317 315 310 320 326 328 329 330 931 3316 331b 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 348 347 348 353 Ash Maple Ma ple Maple Maple Ma ple Maple Maple M aple Maple Maple Wale Maple Ma Maple Ash As h Ash Ash Ash Ash MaPie Maple M aple Maple Made Oak Oak Oak Maple Ba sswood Basswo od Basswood Oak Ash Maple Elm Maple Ash Oak Elm Oak Oak Oak Oak Maple: Oak Oak Oak Maple Marla 24' 14' 8" 10" 17 16" 12" 16' 8' 18" 12" 18" 16" 16" 18" 14" 12" 12' 17 8" 12" 18"' 14" 1 14' 1 17 16" 16" 10" 10" 28" 28" 16' 10" 30" 14" 8" 12" 30" 12" 355 357 358 358a 3588 Maple Oak Basswood Ba sswoo d Basswoo d Basswood Ba sswood Basswood O ak Maple Maple 10" 30" 16" 359 360 381 362 363 14" 13* 17 17 Elm O ak Ma ple Oak Maple Oa k Maple Elm Basswoo d M aple Maisie 385 368 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 388 387 18" 18" M aple MaPle lAaple Maple M aple Maple M aple As h Maple Ash Ma ple Maple Maple maple Ma ple 10" ir 12" 12" 17 12" 6" 8" 20" io- 17 16" 388 380 390 391 392 393 394 395 397 399 402 404 405 Maple M aple Maple m am a 8" 12" Eke Maple Maple Ash Maple Maple 14" 17 407 409 411 423 425 432 442 443 444 445 446 Maple Bog Elder lAsple Moab Basswood Oak Bassso od Ash Ash Ma ple Baasv ood Balsawood Ba sswood Bassw ood Masde Maple Ma ple Bass wood M aple Basswo od 16" 12" 12" 24" 18" 28" 28" 12" 8" 12" 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 15_51 Bass wood 454 Maple 4456 17 14* MaPle 24" 16" 16" 707,41. SAVED 1063' TREES REMOVED FOR SANITARY SEWER (NOT INCLUDED IN %REMOVALS) 349 350 951 352 354 358 Oa k Maple M ap le Maple Maple Oak 8" 10" 8" 24" TO TAL REM OVED Or TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION TOTALS TOTAL EXISTING TREES SURVEYED TREES OFF -SITE TOTAL TREES ON -SITE TREES SAVED — ON -SITE ONLY: 2986-250 = TREES REMOVED — ON -SITE ONLY: 1240 = %REMOVAL ALLOWED PER Clrf CODE REQUIRED REPLACEMENT PER CODE 25 % 326" 3900" 31.8% PROPERTY AND TREE SURVEY PERFORMED BY DEMARS-GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS , INC. D ATED 2/17/06 ENG INEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC. 10250 Va lley View R oad, Male 123 Eden Prank, Minnesota 55944 Fu: 362 446 4200 vuw evwe nacan MEDINA Gaya/M edina, AI M 2052 Gounly Road 24 Medina, Minnesot a 55340 Pho ne: 7433 473-4643 F ar 763473-9350 PRELIMINARY PL AT L OCATIO N MEDINA, MN SH EET TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERV ATION PLAN 6 DATE R EVISI ON A 8/1013 CITY C OMMENTS 13 11/08113 CITY COM MENTS C 11/25/13 CITY COM MEN TS PLA N, SP ECIFICATIO N, OR REPORT W AS PREPA RED ID 14E OR UND ER MY DI RECT DUL Y LICE NSED PROFMIO NAL ENGINEER UN DER 7140 LAWS OF TliE ST ATE OP MINNESOTA, Deald Nash D ATE 11/25/2013 RLGIS TR ATIO N N 0141100 21336 DR AWN BY CHE CKED BY D MS DJN DAT E PROJEC T ft 11 .26 .2013 2013-016.1 SHEET NUMBER C102 ( IOW AGENDA ITEM: 8 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner DATE: September 4, 2014 MEETING: September 9, 2014 Planning Commission SUBJ: Comprehensive Plan — Staging and Growth Plan; Pace of Development Background At the July 15 meeting, the City Council directed staff to initiate a study of the City's Staging and Growth Plan. This direction came following discussions related to concerns raised to the City Council members of the rapid pace of residential development over the past few years, and the impact that such development has on infrastructure and services. There were also discussions related to the Metropolitan Council's adoption of the Thrive MSP2040 plan. The Thrive documents include projections of population, household, and employment growth in the various communities in the metropolitan areas. The projections show less growth in Medina than was previously projected and planned for. With these two factors in mind, the City Council directed staff to initiate a study of the Staging/Growth Plan of the Comprehensive Plan. The study is intended to assist the Planning Commission and City Council in determining whether to consider amendments to the Staging/Growth Plan. The City Council specifically limited the scope of the study to the Staging/Growth Plan. Matters related to planned land uses, the extent and location of the MUSA (Metropolitan Urban Service Area), and so forth are planned to be discussed in the next few years as the City updates the entire Comprehensive Plan. Summary of Development Activity As of the 2010 census, Medina had 1702 households, and a population of 4892. The City's 2010-2030 Comprehensive Plan, in accordance with Met Council mandates, planned for approximately 2500 additional households over the 20 year time period, approximately 125 units per year. Since 2011, the City has granted at least preliminary approval for the development of 518 single family lots and 41 townhomes as follows: 1) Enclave at Medina (2011) — 118 single family, 41 townhomes 2) Enclave at Brockton (2012) — 118 single family 3) Fields of Medina (2011) — 65 single family 4) Fields of Medina West (2012) — 64 single family 5) Reserve of Medina (2013) — 126 single family 6) Woods of Medina (2014) —16 single family 7) Fawn Meadows (2014) — 11 single family In addition to these approved developments, the following developments have been discussed: 1) DR Horton Stage I Plan (stage I plan approved) — 85 single family, 56 apartment units 2) Villas at Medina Country Club (preliminary plat pending) — 48 single family Staging/Growth Plan Page 1 of 5 September 9, 2014 Discussion Planning Commission Meeting 3) Dominium (stage I plan pending) — 26 affordable rental townhomes 4) 22 Hamel Place — (site plan review pending) — 8 apartment units 5) Woodland Hill Preserve (concept plan reviewed) — 4 additional single family In terms of actual build -out, the City has issued permits for 309 residential units since April 2010. In 2013, the City issued a record number of permits, for 163 units. These new homes have added an approximate $153,000,000 of market value to the City's tax base. In comparison to the large amount of residential development and construction, the City has experienced relatively little commercial development. Since April 2010, two commercial projects have been constructed, adding approximately $5,000,000 of market value to the City's tax base. The new development discussed above are displayed on the enclosed map. Updated Metropolitan Council projections/Process During May of 2014, the Met Council approved of the "Thrive MSP2040" document. This document includes household, population, and employment forecasts for each city in the metro area for the next 25 years. The projections show substantially less residential growth in the City than was forecasted in the 2010-2030 Comp Plan. The Met Council projects 1800 new households between 2010-2040, approximately 60 units per year; half of the pace planned for in the current Comp Plan. The City's historical growth and these projections are displayed on the graph below: 'Metropolitan Council Household 'Projections -Actual Historical Growth � ! Original. Projections (2008) we. updated projections (2014) 2000 2005 x010 2015 2020 '2025 2030 2035 2040 These updated projections are one of the first actions taken by the Metropolitan Council in the decennial Comp Plan update process. From these projections, the Met Council prepares system plans for wastewater treatment, transportation, parks, etc., over the next eight months. The Met Council plans to finalize these documents into city -specific system statements in September 2015. The release of these system statements triggers the City's requirement to update its Comp Plan by 2018. The City will be required to update its Comprehensive Plan sometime between September 2015 and the end of 2018. In the past, this has been a multi -year process with many open houses, task force meetings, and additional public participation components. Staging/Growth Plan Discussion Page 2 of 5 September 9, 2014 Planning Commission Meeting The Met Council has decided that it will review Comprehensive Plan Amendments before September 2015 under the updated population forecasts. However, until the various system plans have been approved, amendments will be reviewed to make sure they are consistent with the existing system plans. Additional Development Capacity In addition to the 559 residential units approved and the applications pending review, there is additional property identified within the Staging Plan which can be developed at any time. This includes approximately: • 80 net acres Low Density Residential (160-250 units) • 100 net acres Medium Density Residential (minimum of 350 units) • 35 net acres Mixed Use (minimum 13 acres residential; 35-180 residential units) • 100 net acres Business/Commercial land uses Most of the property noted above is located within the Wayzata School District. Staff has included the school district boundaries on the enclosed Future Land Use Map and Staging/Growth Plan map for reference. As discussed above, the City will have between fall 2015 to the end of 2018 to update the Comprehensive Plan. Additional property would become available for development in 2016 under the current adopted Staging/Growth Plan. This property is identified in yellow on the map. The property includes approximately: • 137 net acres Low Density Residential (274-411 units). • 116 net acres Business/Commercial land uses The current Comprehensive Plan permits flexibility within the Staging/Growth plan. This flexibility would permit a property to "jump ahead" one five-year time period under certain circumstances. The 2021-2025 staging period includes approximately: • 35 net acres Low Density Residential (70-210 units) • 65 net acres Mixed Use (minimum 33 acre residential; 115-350 residential units) • 60 net acres Business/Commercial land uses Open House Feedback Staff held two Open Houses to seek feedback from residents, businesses, and property owners on the information provided above. Comment cards were received at the meeting and are attached to this report. Approximately 60-70 people attended the open houses. Staff has summarized the responses to the most quantitative questions on the cover page. Staff requested that Open House attendees mark where they lived or owned property in order to display these geographically. This map is attached for reference. In addition to the forms submitted at the Open Houses, a good number of comments were submitted from residents after the Open Houses, most of whom did not attend the Open Houses but reviewed the information on the City's website. These are also attached. Many of these people included their addresses so there is a sense of the location of many of the respondents. The Planning Commission should draw its own conclusions from the comments submitted. Generally, there was a fairly even mix of responses from attendees at the Open Houses, with the Staging/Growth Plan Page 3 of 5 September 9, 2014 Discussion Planning Commission Meeting exception of commercial/industrial development. Few attendees believed the pace of commercial/industrial development was too rapid or supported reducing the pace. The comments submitted after the Open Houses were predominantly from Bridgewater residents and overwhelmingly concluded that residential development was too rapid and should be slowed. Many of these respondents also found that commercial/industrial development was too rapid. Potential Options As noted above, the City Council directed staff to prepare the study of the Staging/Growth plan to determine if amendments to the Staging/Growth plan should be considered prior to the City initiating the Comprehensive Plan update process. Depending on the Planning Commission's recommendation and the Council's determination whether action is necessary, there are various options available to the City. The following list does not include all potential actions, but is meant to provide context and examples to consider. If the Planning Commission and Council determine that amendments are not necessary at this time, the following actions could be taken: Take no action The City could take no action and continue implementing the existing Comprehensive Plan. As noted above, the City would begin an update of the entire plan during the fall of 2015. Take no immediate action, expedite update process As noted above, updating the Comprehensive Plan tends to take a few years and is due by the end of 2018. The City could attempt to expedite the process to the extent possible while still ensuring a robust public process. The City could begin some of the process in the near term even before the fall 2015 release of the system statements. There is some risk that work would need to be duplicated if one of Met Council's revised system statements contained unexpected requirements for the City. However, staff believes this is unlikely based on the information released in Thrive MSP2040. Even under the best circumstances utilizing an aggressive schedule, staff does not believe the City could have an updated Comp Plan before late 2016. This is largely related to at least six months of review time likely by neighboring jurisdictions and the Met Council. If the Planning Commission and City Council are interested in considering amendments to the Staging/Growth Plan to reduce the "development capacity", the following actions could be considered: Remove flexibility in Staging/Growth plan As referenced above, the current Staging/Growth plan includes flexibility for a property to "jump ahead" by one five-year timeframe. For example, current regulations would permit a property owner in the 2016-2020 timeframe (yellow on the Staging/Growth map) to request Staging/Growth Plan Page 4 of 5 September 9, 2014 Discussion Planning Commission Meeting development at this time. There are special requirements for such a request which are described in the zoning code. Removing this flexibility would mean less property would be eligible for development at this time. It would also mean that on January 1, 2016, the property in the 2021-2025 staging period could not request to "jump ahead." If the Commission and Council want to consider this option, it may be worth discussing whether removing the flexibility should apply to ALL land uses or if it should only apply to certain uses. Amend Staging/Growth plan to shift property to later Staging periods The Planning Commission and Council could consider amendments to the Staging/Growth plan which would delay when properties would be permitted to develop. If the Commission and Council consider such amendments, there are many things to consider. The amendments could be applied to all uses, or only uses. The amendments could be centered on certain geographical areas of the City. Alternatively, the Commission and Council could consider amendments on a parcel -by -parcel basis. Based on the feedback related to commercial/industrial development, the Planning Commission and City Council could also consider amendments to the Staging/Growth plan which would add flexibility for the Staging of business/commercial properties. Staff does not believe there is strong evidence that the slower pace of commercial/industrial development is a result of a lack of land supply. However, if there is a belief that this may be the case, the Staging/Growth plan could be amended to allow these properties to develop sooner. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission discuss the matters above and provide a recommendation to the City Council on whether amendments to the Staging/Growth Plan should be initiated, and generally what those amendments should be. Attachments 1. Staging and Growth Plan (w/ School District Boundaries) 2. Future Land Use Plan (w/ School District Boundaries) 3. Map showing location of recent developments 4. Map showing location of Open House attendees 5. Summary of Comments Received 6. Comments received at Open House 7. Comments received after Open House Staging/Growth Plan Page 5 of 5 September 9, 2014 Discussion Planning Commission Meeting COUNTY ROAD 11 Inde pendence rn O cc z O 0 HIG HWAY 55 ISD #278 - Oro no Spurzem Half Moon COUNTY ROAD 24 Holy Name Katrina w School Lake CO N N U) CHESTNUT 3 - Rockford ISD #284 - Wa yzata ISD #278 - Orono 140105 4' Wolsfeld NAVAJO MEDIN NTY ROAD 214 ' 0 HACKAMO RE 0.25 0 .5 CHEYENNE w z S Mooney Mile Map 5-3 MEDINA Staging and Growth w/ School District Boundaries Urban Services Phasing Plan Developed 2008 2001-2010 2011-2015 2016-2020 2021-2025 2026-2030 Developing Post -2030 No Urban Services Planned Met Council LTSSA School District Boundaries Generally, the Phasing Plan demonstrates that development shall proceed in a east to west pattern . This phasing plan allows flexibility between adjacent phases to allow for proper infrastructure planning and development . The Grey area reflects the area identified by the City to be developed Post 2030 . The Met Council has identified the LTSSA for potential future access to urban services . No services are planned during the timeframe covered by this Plan . Ad opted: November 17, 2009 Parcel current as of October 2006 UTM, Zone 15N, NAD 83 Scale: 1:30,000 CHIPPKINA WWI -411"Il COUNTY ROAD 11 Miles 0 0 .25 0.5 1 Map 5-2 MEDINA Future Land Use Plan w/ School District Boundaries Guide Plan Rural Residential IIIII Agriculture Developing -Post 2030 Low Density Res 2.0 - 3 .49 U/A Medium Density Res 3 .5 - 6 .99 U/A High Density Res 7 - 30 U/A Mixed Use 3.5 - 6.99 U/A Mixed Use - Business 7 - 45 U/A Commercial General Business Industrial Business IA Private Recreation (PREC) Parks and Recreation P -R - State or Regional Open Space Public Semi -Public 0 U/A Closed Sanitary Landfill Right -of -Way Last Amended: May 21, 2013 (CPA 2030-4) Adopted: November 17, 2009 UTM, Zone 15N, NAD 83 Scale: 1:30,000 0.25 0.5 CHESTNUT Medina NAVAJO HACKA MORE awn Mea. ows/Woodhill'Preserve 11-15 ho mes Reserve of Medina 126 homes Hof Medina 16 ho Wild Meadows CLYDE Enclave of Medina 277 homes lands Recent Development Activity Legend - Commercial -Approved Residential -Approved Residential -Pending Approved Commercial Hamel Station (2008) - retail/office OSI (2010) -120,000 s.f. office Approved Residential Enclave of Medina (2010-2012) 236 single family, 41 townhomes Fields of Medina (2011-2012) 129 single family Reserve of Medina (2013) 126 single family Wo ods of Medina (2014) 16 single family Fawn Meadows/Woodhill Preserve 11-15 single family (2014) e Pending Residential DR H orton 85 single family, 56 apartments Medina Country Club 48 single family Dominium 26 affordable rental townhomes 22 Hamel Place 8 apartment units Where do you live or own pro perty? • Please place a blue dot where you live or on which property you own. N A Miles 2 z A COUNTY RD 1 3 I Hidden Lake 4 5 6 7 8 a cc w 9 Joivip w 8 O oo •c ERA S 0 z 2 0 0 U MAPLE ST Independence O O B C D E IV�fintt,t�a i�er — I— — — e,P Miller 0 0 w a i0 0 y, O O O O O CO ON co d C) C) N F CITES RANCI cc 11 Krieg — — Thies • DEERHILL RD ORNIN GSID KELLE R RD G H I HACKAMORE RD L LO ST HORSE RC TRINKA RD PAWNEE R I 0 O O N CHIPPEWA RD_4_, CHESTNUT RD Q . ¢ 0 0 0 0 w 0 cc LACKFOOT TRL COUNT Y ROAD 24 I DEERHILL RD O O N O 0 O C0 N TRAPP9RSTR C ASTERD TOWE cc LILIUM TR Std(,WNEE WOODS R E VERGRE ▪ EN RD CHEYENNEITRL N o • I 73 co O I e�`P • -3I 0 O CO p1AJ 01 E 4800 - 4400 4000 3600 3200 w 2800 2 2400 - 2000 z 0 0 0 — 1600 0 0.25 0.5 Summary of Responses received at Open Houses: 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 9 5 10 4 5 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3 7 11 7 3 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 1 1 12 12 8 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These 18 12 2 14 IVIEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke( ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid (A good pace Comments: Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow��� Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace, of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial (None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: > �-'/ir , ,) 1 J / ✓1„6/7,:(-4 - ;.'/( l'ii.i/ri ! 1-f� i.�C L. :�-�jt /�r'(�G • , ) Z-c:--zt) • 6 J Name: ii -,_x)-74 =� A" a,,c. i/,' i t AL, --p Address: Email: Phone: / .1 Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes )0 l> (! f/tU 1 No Iq) /No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact infoiination to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: ,p_A 1/Ul i A good pace —/v LCC`2 Too slow Much too slow l 5 ttztile 7 t' 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace ( Too slow ) Much too slow Comments: (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial (one of These'` ___1-/ Comments: 5. Additional continents or questions: Name:`_ .1A1 Email: ) C i 6ittirty y Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Address: C% Phone: 70 607 ej% Yes Yes Yes No /No% Nod MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke( ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow { Much too slow ) 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow J 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of devel pn eiif: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: �.� t ✓�.� R(\ Address: ii ,7 i yv / -t('1., -/Phone: /(t'/ -2,) A 6 5-5: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: YES-- frNO Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes (._No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your naive or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke(ci.medina.inn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid ( i'oo Rapid/) A good pace Comments: Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family. Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: ri 4,, . �� ���, s 9U/ fl �'/ G o "fir, J' 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Address: Email: f�' - l G'�t %v‘-Ce c / • UP -1- Phone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Infonnation is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: (� A good pace ~� Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: Address: :>'J -1 d JJ ;) 17 (' /I tAe Cci:4hone: < r 4' 0/ f/r";�� E i 7& 47,7`A/ (17 Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Infoituation is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same infonnation. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your naive and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finkenci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace � Too slow Much too slow i 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow' Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Address: Email: Phone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Yes Yes No No No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Comments: Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: j Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: 1/ Name: — 'G�----' Address: ///vim ://4?-\-4)/fer, Phone: ((, '' 5 Y— 57 7 Email: Phone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Q_No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No f MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke( ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid " Comments: Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Email: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Phone: Wo ly,33 ( Yes Yes No No No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact infoiiiiation to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke a,ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow • 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace (Too slow Comments: -Y` g'f v ;%f r" /1;',/ / /,//'(/ i n a (-GW/7 %° 7,../////7/4,,:.?//".. /'7' l/ / /4)/( / ✓/l XII / ' //ice, Much too slow /(over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential > Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: - Name: Email: Address: Phone: Please contact me regarding my continents/questions: - Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your naive and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): CMuch too Rapes Too Rapid L I �` �A good pace Too ,� Too slow Much too slow Ye -4e- 7L; iJ✓�] � -• �`,�`J z‘,--/;-/ %' .c- -t' , 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid , A good pace Too slow Comments: Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential'; Multiple -Family Residential CommerciaUIndustrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: Please contact me regarding my continents/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Address: Phone: Yes Yes Yes 7/1 c/, /i_j Cr-- - 6--;-,-`5.°6-- No �, No No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same infonnation. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the infonnation below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact infonnation to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. finke(cD,ci.medina.mn. us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid' A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commerciaUindustrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow 2 Much too slow Comments: ! , u.; 0v i� �Lr_ C__C'; CC cLc"`r1 f f `s 1(.\- (":-0 c iY\ 1_ L_ t �Q 111 )L- L' i N \ (, c (i< (over) 1 1 • riot- Lo ,;(1:Vei-rtt `3 ='' 1`-b 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: Address: Phone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same infozixiation. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their Septeinber'9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid i A good pace 15SIc: 9 /'4t c; APP;zi?1"Ir'a D ( Too slow Much too slow �u T 001; /46-,f 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: 'boo Rapid? A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: LO Too Rapid JC. %� AA good pace, C —`1i D:/CL Too slow Much too slow v et C . } ., 0 y.) /,s 0 t)`'i/c.. (/t r -,0L (over) 'Lit7).1) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential =IVIultiple-Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: r-)/zc0 C —v gi 0 r�J 6--s) 4' 0:=1'y7v»'I "! tc� // J f A1-4 4, rsi 11,i 1)/(C - moo U / c i» g Lj Li % T J- 5. Additional comments or questions: �� + .�c.� Lz, % f -0 _s- Eply.;' Name: Email: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Address: ("I) Phone: Yes Yes Yes No No No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke(c�ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Too Rapid A good pace r_ J z U 3 i— A ; D/ 5 I Much too Rapid Comments: ri )0, Too slow Much too slow x,s1 fit 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commerciaUindustrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good -pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential' Multiple -Family Residential Comments: Commercial/Industrial None of These 5. Additional continents or questions: Name: � \��v Email: (-c Address: A\ 2 - Phone: Please contact me regarding my continents/questions: Yes Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dustv.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent ace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid ( oo apia A good pace Too slow Much too slow Comments: ,�.z-e'ybu Dl� A- Ct' &,t-t_J;/Lh ✓cy7 - 4-t) Li4,?‘Ei , /17 z>.i:./.71-fi —6-Gc-c— ,-i°-?' 1 G' 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A -go pale_ Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace /Too slow Much too slow Comments: /tf- fj 717/4' 7171 7,-//44/ (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial Comments: (/i .,/-4 ✓t /- r' ( None of Th se e 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: / We�6jj? 4 Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Address: %-0 Phone: Yes I Gam' ,y , MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pac % Too slow Comments: Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Comments: >> j i e 1 irki f v p 1 '1 Much too slow (; v.� AwA-y) 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace ( Too slow Much too slow Comments: CJ e -t /1 1.'.2-2' lot -`' C r A r ""7-7 6 bc,i )AA'S ;t- 0 S 0_, 1 C (-JP is c rrj .-77 , D a (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential ultiple-Family Residential Commercial/Industrial i D�; r� w 1�—� j� a — in Comments: None of These tizr c,$) 7'Fj 4,. -S_. 5. Additional comments or questions: 0 .g Q ,+J Name: Email: 1,5 a d') O. A ky 1\l G; .a ©,`� p ' , q ° L : C, u ri7 pv - Address: Phone: Please contact me regarding my continents/questions: ( Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes (1,___No Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No S f i 1t MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact infoiiiiation to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): 1Q4hch too Rapid .. -� Too Rapid A good pace Comments: i ;�n: (9 . ()f;`t i,U C,1r)t<r,l'i'. ,N\ 1 1 !"fi�^1�%!i�s \i ^, J •ld 1xCR 0C'i tl v �u'1ii �r (?�j -a �tv C� ��11i0si Vii`, Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): ''Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow 11 ' Comments: l ,1j €a `rt_ J Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid ,>A good Too slow Comments: Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residentil' Commercial/Industrial None of These comments' 5. Additional comments or questions: t\ --ft --;:,)--t;1 65, NI Name: i j1 ', 1 f-) Email: C k\5`1 „. lttiq�Z� Address: Phone: ) r r to., A04-- i c-, i1C.- „ Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: 670 No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes 7 6--''2 Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes i No f' MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow uch too slum) I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow lrtoo slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential j Multiple -Fancily Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: 4 �f4 i Address: Phone: G / i — 4,1 % r5 3c'L k Please contact me regarding my continents/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact infoiiiiation to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow 1 Much too slot 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too sloNNY (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: tingle -Family Residenti 1 Multiple -Family Residential om : awe� u None of These 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: 5,- Address: L' Phone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow / Much too slow 3. 1 believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development. Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: v2 f r te; v Name: Email: 4eiiilk.1./ 4/) &/,;2, 4'/9 , / P7 Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Comments: MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your naive or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke( ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapfd� Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): \2�o pid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): (--Much too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Reside r, multiple -Family Residential:, C mmercial/Indust it al --.j Comments: None of These �n 613 -Ft- C,L'� (i I � =4- 4 �✓u"; �Dl yJ 1< 5. Additional comments or questions: b1,e �'� 1 ylJr,/ !7' r� IG Ian f_c;,1C t�,Ti' P.1�40 —IN >Ir� w t .,, a� l i� E i�1 l C¢ ��. 0 v r� I � �YV Name: • Address: Email: Y Phone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke( ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): uch too Rapid ') Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow Comments: A2 L Lti l�C i`` nc _ I it---v-.. ro r �- _ Nit x_t_n LA I Lt 4 n:^ A:.,k , 1. 12:-,j . s c)--Q—k- I_2 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow t 1,J rY.,.-F ,A c c f 1 .,a 4 - ,:A i . , < 1'_ t7 r 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid '"A good pace `; Too slow Much too slow Comments: '__ () NL .i2 ,- ` -1. �°� e. "5\ , z Cc:: l div€,A;(t.i c.?� .1 ci -Li A-1 (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential ) Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: ii i —' Address: 1 i, ��j l (Li Email: 1 A 4^n P 5 p 1" Cc cv i A -- 2 M ,, LL_,vin Phone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke(cci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 / Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace cifsingle-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Too Rapid A good pace Too slow j n`ments: %4;"/,%=2/),/, /G Ve %i i mil( 1 `/ % / �' % -i / �, a'? (%,/( l J , G,/ 6. _, 7,,,_, ,c)---)--1_, ze it 4-ez_ -i L, /,SLY 7%l�' G'(- 7 2. I believe the recent pace of mulfi e-familyl residential — p development in Medina has been (circle one): .29-r,'0, � Too slow Much too Rapid Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace / Vii/ -'/7,/-- Much too slow ?f 4 Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in -Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid �'A good pace (—Too slow ice_/ — Comments: Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of developme t: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial Comments: /'�/l�'/c(i/f• ` U/ -7, �`LJ' �'z /g /�� y a -v\ -j7 (/ /t/l /G //z( G°(//// ! % /7 ice !! r (,CJ;'!,-( / .9-17/ Gf> ✓l /, {/.( (,- "ice %/%b-/' �� ! , Gz- t� Sg °„ ti�., ./.._ 72_‘-?...(_; rL.&' :T -z: .'-'z/( �': /1-7,,,,,,,7,;-7,--,' - % �� '1 L/ � ., 2911.7C.: iL � 1)t<__� 5. Additional comments or questions: �/ -%1 ` l' CMG / /. %� vY'� � " _ C I- ' 5i(J C:a -t--L / -! Lid " __ P G�)G- v l `(�`'' >'r) ' i l (% ')--rfi 2 / Cam, None of These • / Address: �i / , C-01'1 Phone: c' /) j/i�ij Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Infoiniation is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The infoiniation is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief.presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all, of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. finke ci.inedina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid ( A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too sio�w (over) J J q-c-JJ A\ 5,,./k- 1''7 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial ��� /�� J Comments: V �1 5-C1P r%(�� rrS�U C��ijr� /'4 c(%1.. /4ii , G v (( f r 5. Additional continents or questions: Name: Email: �� CA�iG/fq vKC. Address: Phone: ‘I) .2c2 2a od Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact infotivation to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke( ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1 I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): iM tt iI too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow tc%Scho) 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Ton R pid A good pace Comments: e e GO --4,C Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one):. Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good ce Too slow Much too slow Comments: (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Grog lan reduce the pace of the following types of development: Zultiple-Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These pp Comments: Dili./ / ( C/ t-fu;`eSS UI 7""0)v) 4/�k / 11,UY5 c/ 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Address: Phone: Yes Yes Yes No No No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Infonnation is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential developrnent in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Comments:__.__/ Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Mu ch uch too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial developrnent in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace) Too slow Much too slow (over) e U u ��` coo C J M a C0 S 0,t; I S,r,(fL,17 pU 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: /Single -Family Residential) (Multiple -Family Residential vCommercial/Industrial - None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: cur i 1 fI\ 'A _' "� �� V \ C,O \vV v 1 I \ �_� �� Ci� f- 4, l 0 ss. d (L t/_l, O 'Y t / ✓t a.. ✓ [.� t.� G V1 t �) r� (u l�\ S a .J v v (A0 LYr ii V` v) t r �,,1v� S z C1C 'J - U �( J IA V �.. �r ..�^`,1 ._���^,(�I CV `J, Lr LJ .� (1 +' (iL ; 1.7��,1 'r\ \ i�-�! [ • "`x..... 1(41// eiC1--� .tjti( ` Its Name: Address: - Email: - • - _ , , . Phone: tJ Vic, 9- 1 c v arcIj�� 0-1 ctvi,11 Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes ; Y`/' 71 GO— /4 I9/11-• fic� (15 Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No /- Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No e (t'ce, - MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace ) Too slow Much too slow Comments: 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Comments: Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid ( A good pace\ Too slow Comments: Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: None of These Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial Comments: J`141/V1 2 6 �� j�F ,� ' li G /14:' S L/, f /4--I' / 5a i e e -/Lb L1 T� EA/TOY V' c_/r/ i j /1`' 50L -b / f /s-lii L-i -i7//47 (3-7-74-1"/.16: viv"u/(L ), 5. Additional comments or questions: 36.714 A=-ALI) TO f) °'A/A-1 L/4-A/A /2°4, 011/01.11-13/1- k) ;_7) G C hO A,[ -r M- -(1411% Y j l i V 1) A!% d A—L%5s '74G -%AZ //v' 774-T Name: Email: J Address: . -- Phone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: ( Yes / No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: ( Yes No Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: (Yes No / MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dustv.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I belie e he recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow Comments: ,.0 .SC/1 00 ! d /5 151 i e f A)A S ce.- i" c C:-11i.,j cI (3 'Aced fl} C 1v ) s 1 I, of i a) r l t a i cal d o_iv e t o e-ur/ 1 /, Jf i5 ii i',911 S-- -i (dA-r(1 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too R pidf A good pace Too slow Much too slow Comments: 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: //L% / 3 /2 & r t,;';.l V// (C�/1 )4/ (over) -7-/c c,_/-7--; A good pace Too slow) Much too slow (r re- , "e v((G p ! lle- "'J E' Si 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: ( Single -Family ResidentiaLA Multiple -Family Residential i Comm' ercial/Industrial / None of These // Comments: j� ��t' �1�{ G� (c' %' l ( Ci. I . V c,i,�' S (11,00(`S' SLY e J JLI- -- cr& Litt ( /,. , ' '-itt, 1'1 h Gt S' S ' l' 1,// ( t c? 4 S �� �� � k7c, (,-62 C.f 5. Additional comments or questions: / : TIC) („'v/1. 7(. / �1 1/10/6,/-0_, cho f �4 L Y" 1 { t; -11 t S /-17-12-;:),?:t"' G�:1%l G c! t 5- f( (t f S :►,v I C � , (t7 G� / C/di:/1)'-A-. f i � t ' 6-6/(77(147,-(::-/(1.:/"-/)-//1:1-51: (, 7' C fc,r�r�f1 r S( W_. tr f 7' P t Name: Email: V .. , tAA Address: • I. 11Udle: I .�.\ , Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: e ( No ) CV S (;'-4l-'l w'-0� E // Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: (:_,Yes % No Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: ( Yes) No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. fnke a,ci.medina.rn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid � Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow _ 40 �, c,,0 I-kt,r� C.kiA),> - 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A-ga-6d pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential )MultiPle-FalflhlY Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: -___- 5. Additional comments or questions: r '1r '1 1 bA,N. -11H 1 V") \i/) I A :41111 f Kwk_ (Leu .) v I,\A nJiD t/Y (2_ Name: Email: Address: Phone: 0 I LY-.J 1 iV ✓C.. l-' Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: C Yes ) No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: p (.�Yes ; No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the.recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Mirchj .o Ri i d Too Rapid A good pace • Com'ents: / � - � e /c,,y {� Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace 0o slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Sirrgle-Family Residential Multiple -Family Res dential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Address: Email: p „ _:ne: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: es 1 No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes % No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace (5 Too slow Much too slow ??2&' C 0/27:7/4„))-- f ti? ! ' LI /d) -f M i t % f ✓� Cr'/"7/ '7 U'vi t 1) t fuCr2 ,`5_-.{2 / ;1) och 7 , ' r C- \Ai / 7 0 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace / Too s Much too slow Comments: . ./.I%f �%��. �U`� /95 Z6,_ [) o/vi / L/ z) /3✓/c9P).-s �/t �?C'C�I tf 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow ) (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These 2) Comments: %i �` �� /J/?/U 5 A--5-5 ____, U 772/94)/ / i'�oca.,Ir -ia `s %719t/L 1�� <�J WO) t,IV& j=,)n / �7 -11,) /-1/3"2-5 / G'_ //9Z c� /G ..5 -_:,12' 72 1. jU 7)71-):9 f , / �j ,,,/-426--)1;'-__ 69 i-4/ .etz__ J �<5-v/r / 'i /� i?/f vgz /7)9✓ir %ham c)ip/7 o ry /; //r %-/` . 7. 1 � 5. iddi iona co/mments or uesttiions: il.;975; 56 /SS U)S CG,rn( OP' G`)C-C- c;.SL /vZ-/,) -=c C;. c:3 n--1 z 7 ' C.) z CI 77 //9/1)Q /-%(/ /v1— Tv <S � y'�%� /v viz Name: Email: 141 / c—✓ f Address: )/4 i J Cd:ti1'hone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: es Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Infoimation is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid I Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Agood pace Too slow Much too slow Comments: (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: jSing1eFami1Y Residential .1 Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: 1L) Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: (-Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: 1 -, kr-1' C7- Address: Phone: Yes Yes No No No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your naive and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace, Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace /Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: 1" -Co,_ -4 (, A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Address: 1 1 Email: Phone: _ Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yew Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: ( Yes No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential) Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: 1) Namt. - ,.- Email: y • Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Address: J..'+•+ - Phone: . ,:_ .. No No No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact infonnation if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Too Rapid A good pace to i i oO —G U, Much too Rapid Comments: C 4/( Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace C, Too slot_) Comments: ' C �' �`� _ /� , JJ Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid (� A good pace j Too slow n Comments: (/t 2. � i -e' �� (over) Much too slow 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential/ Multiple -Family Residential Comments: Commercial/Industrial None of These ( 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: C; { 4 11 1(1,, -. / e, Address: CND Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yew No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Summary of Responses received after Open Houses: 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 25 9 1 0 0 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 18 5 8 1 3 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 8 9 13 4 1 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These 31 27 14 1 T Y 0 MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. finke(cD,ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: A,good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid good pace Too slow Much too slow 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residentia Multiple -Family Residential CommercialfIndustrial C�i Q I1ws�' bUA uni2er e44.) /PJJ. /o +nu &sS I V' . S.).dditional comments •r questions: • �eC :k i p Ategite. eeta Name: r Ite,k Address: ' G V'tee/1 I 0 ✓u. None of These tou CUJ{i(bt �S Email: J a /1. cod., Phone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. tinkew.ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): sch too Rapi Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): 1' uch too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina Comments: Too Rapid A good pale \° \1t t 1 AQ has been (circle one): Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pac le -Family Residentia Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: lowing types of development: Multiple -Family Residentia Co mercial/Industrial None of These Name: Email: div4a---13 640-1-4- CeAvs- Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Address: Phone: Yes No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.tinke0,;ci.meclina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I leve the ----recent-pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe -fie recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/ nl d'ustrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Stagi g/Growth-plan-to_rentice the._pac.e_of_the_followingty es of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial Comments: None of These 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: f 1 C. 0,-; (a) C H �, ���G' Email: e,\lit Address: �J �I 1 Ty; Phone: r1 — tiJeti() r D -1(-(C? Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: No G MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. t nke(«:ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid ,J A good pace Too slow Comments: Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): 1 Inch too Rapid Commen s: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) C__ ngle-Family Resider Comments: 4. I would support amending the Staoino/Growth..lan to reduce the pace of th- + . t 4.es of development: None of These Multiple -Family Residential 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: Address: Phone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. finke(c7 ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Comments: Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: 0o Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow rn� o vo iv -\ 1,0M f.3I,()vpp) a,rta - We. u --e_ r 5o 3 1 ._T- J(over) "� Ye� Cor\ r- I Si"1 e-srlo k , 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: ti Single -Family Residential Multiplc-Family Residential\ Commercial/Industrial None of iese Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: we cu, ,-n CJ > rdivi (1.9 C U YY1, vnu 1/014-1 Name: vvA vO In Email: e �lc7�iVlCtl� ( Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Address: 45v (J ►0 ` (/fi e I I ( L S Phone: Yes No No No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Commen s: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I beli- - - recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of comrnercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one)::, Comments: Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Sta Single -Family Residential Comments: wth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Multiple -Family Residential None of These 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: TzwIc_ t,t,(,t e . t—Q,A.Phone: Address: ( i5 Z 1 l'etrj 1, ! v Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your naive or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. tinke. c;ci.rnedina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the nt dace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of com cral/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid /Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) uld support amendin , the S . g rowth plan to reduce t' - .ace Single -Family Residenti owing types o Multiple -Family Residential / CommerciaLIlTtlustrial 5. Additional comments or questions: velopment: None of These Name: Email: /A 9,.t, /R Address: 3Y' //kQ1,// 414--4'l i' q 2/ (,m Phone: / 5 L j//4 2,/z.7 Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Comments: IVIEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dustv.finke ai.ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would sup o e b b rrte =+ - e .ace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industria None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: r /LA 1%01 k A Address: Email: )9. -/ti • !--"" (.2 Q, `/O&e ' ` , Phone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes 763-41-?. 70E, No No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner clustv.finke a!ei.medina.tnn.us (763)473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: et•=-i Too Rapid /1 A good pace Too slow To (10- GEC lyi 1 , • h d M P J 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow Much too slow Comments: q._1/14c Ac r a -v e 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): i) Iuch too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow i\'Iuch too slow Comments: (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Grawth-plan-to reed`ce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential �, ommercial/Industrial None of These nn�� f j' Comments: 4I.r/' e;? `1 � I b,.1 Zi 12_ kj,) 0 vA. ee.P 7) ia- �!),1� p i9i� 5. Additional comments or questions: Address: Phone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Yes 11..})- 1. TC4\,i�' pine_ d , n,p ; ss ill tf 61 ��, `/) No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dustv.finke(c4i.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe e_rc ent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow i\iuch too slow 2. I elieve-the recent -pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace P P� g p Too slow Comments: Much too slow (over Name: 4. would support an el riding�thee_Stiging/Growth plan to -reduce the pace of the following, types of development: \ Single -Family Residenti4- Multiple -Family Residential )Commercial/Industrial Comments: None of These 5. Additional comments or questions: 11\-i'�lt`( �'� ��" ) c J 1 1 CUT -CU G,64� l `4' i k Wi\ -� c ,0 ,Ct*t GU ) 1,-x_0 t jr t 0A r� j14/1 ' 4i ) Address: I � A Email: 1 e)na, 1 )j,1----- t. \9145--K61-1-1 �� 1� %.t..,t� _ X71 .Q- Q�� �ii Phone: vqb,_-L-� A' Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes ) Yes Yes MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. hnke(cvci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow til L/v2 7NV,S 4 -1- G C/7:4- 71-710 c c � or ST` c.f F?Ala i) vur vfmf,-7 j Uf-7 (6 - v.11';-) pt/d (S (3Evrt,N, 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): \luch too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pac Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth .lan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: —Single-Family Residential Comments: Multiple -Family Residents Commercial/Industrial None of These 5. Additional continents or questions: Name: Email: PrAf,)I l 1 d / is 7-11311/r-S� c,u.sfr(NR', NA . (v Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Address: Phone: S32 gLvaGC._ T L J, CW) GC/,4 , X 787( Yes No ; 1/IEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. tinke(a,ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): x `1 Much too Rapid / Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow Comments----XV\IC WIN Cd \n -CV, -(voyl l pi V1 moui"1'1 bef rkU G1v of Opri 5p(kCCJS col_v ioUC}( pc) Du\0.1-1 On( ck-Vc1 G -,ye i5 (kpuoiYlted w41,-) i 1)e pm. -e, of bai i di vl • 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pac Comments: Nerd to be; '1-vt000j4'1j-f u i. 0`190 0-1- Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (cir 1e`one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow i\Iuch too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging_/Gr vti plan to reduce pace of the following types of development: Multiple -Family Residential ") Commercial/Industrial None of These S'ngle Fa nily Residentiab Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: N 3 (NC) N tv)e) Email: r(at'• l�\fle 6 V1'1Gk11. (' Oli(Y) Address: L}LD t\ob 1 i\[ckj Phone: (PO- gl i c 15 Please contact me regarding my conunents/questions: Yes K Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes �J Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes l9 MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. if you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.ftnke('ci.rnedina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential deve tin Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Res' ential Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: ial Commercial/Industrial None of These Name: Daiik Email: 0\a\i'la,cci. 0 e Gen Address: pi"( JJVI`.‹.ka\-Phone: 4-4-0 Z\oeCo&“/,--S Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Comments: IVIEDIN,A Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. tinke«:ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow I\'Iuch too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial deve e.. -lent in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growt Single -Family Residen J Commen s: an to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Multiple -Family Resident' Commercial/Industrial None of These 5. Additional comments or questions: Address: s ). Phone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No MVIEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. tinke�«ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House I. I e. e recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): i\Iuch too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Resident Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: P hifitAUS AlhO\s'N-VA:SW\ c SlYir �,li ►Itf `� Address: De) mad' \y. s. • j, Phone: VI'D•fyyel. Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dustv.finkdie'.ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the re - :. e of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Comments: Too Rapid fr ��A,g000dd pace / Too slow Much too slow eep �/c% `�U' ft or`� ` ( v Q.0 r o 64u - I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid /_ / _A good pace /J Too slow Much too slow Comments: O'. f l'J / SN �o,/l/ Off/CX� (over) 4. I would suoucu?_�Pn_d g the Staging/Growth .lan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential / Multiple -Family Residential Comments: Commercial/Industrial None of These 5.1 Additional continents or questions: Name: a r- 0e) oNfN c- (00 kw- -- tOtil,at ( 0/ Emai1:5 ��F'c C� T� AVC7/ . 6GE^-i Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Address: Phone: camel,. d� ✓' itZt yYay l3l<)e‘ecr T24J K62(.2__ - 016 G Yes Comments: IVIEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I belie • . ce of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow al 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple-familyresidential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Comments: Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of comm- .. ' .ustrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 4. I woulpupport amen. : the Stagin _ . •• :. • e the pac- .f the following types of development: Single -Family Residentia ultiple-Family Residential ' Commercial/Industr' None of These Comments: I/ 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: Address: Phone: 4ir - s. Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes T.Y 0 MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dustv.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential develo sment in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: Address: Caelitn/rye( P4- "—Phone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Yes S5 �1?\•,c//k— /0/i(A4 � 3(7/ q?0^70/(1--- MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single -family -residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid ) A good pace Too slow o Comments: (�'�� nor, lv �r�< c" c.,s-e C _ Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in -Medina has been (circle..oue): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: ( A good pace - ( Too slow Much too slow 4. I would support -amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: ingle-Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Address: Email: CO Q ,C4,*^.. `n Y' G1 • f Phone: --70 , us"C, Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No MEDIA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact infonnation if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the con-esponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dustv.finke(ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid good p e'\ Too slow Comments: Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid. A good pace Too slow--' Comments: Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow (Much too slow (over) 4..I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial (None of These'' Comments: 5. Additional continents or questions: • —.1t01.7:64 _. tt �1 6 ?, o. (i5 1 —= 5e -;t:- 711 %c /� `2t -fr � fcc . t, t� _C" t -`t,� J'2 � ( S Name: ` '74 ! amt- 4 Address: 9 00 t) Email: Phone: '?631-/71.---q57() Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes', No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes 1 Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No ) 1,. MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact infoiiiiation if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dustv.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Comments: -. Y1-61-0 fT l,t ttA (5c_Ao U�1 / r L. (Ar 1A at/'a r- /‘ tIvoc Too slow Much too slow Cry / 5 GGtCu i2 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow Comments: ..___n Cl/� trt(�� Kr.,2 -'X11)12^ to // -- i, , 4c(--- r 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid ood ce Too slow Comments: Much too slow 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Ingle -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Address: ki Email: C >> ( • i • Phone: _ - Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Yes No /(7-(t_ (I\17;) No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dustv.finke(ci.medina.mn,us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow Comments: *St- re sly S / -A Ka 1 )Zr'N. dr U►1, 'b -t- . �f�,i>ed �i�l c� u rte- a cco-v ril w2 NAIL, J ct,ti-ot r. c� (A., '' C e r c -r i c k w6' tiv}--t_. V sa,is 2. I believe the recent pace of m ltiple-family residential develoment in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: -FA l S Too Rapid A good pace � J uro Too slow Much too slow 7 A- .3. I believe the recent pace of commerciaUindustrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid ( A good pace ii,“5-1764-()\-t- Too slow Much too slow 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residentia_CMultiple-Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: bort-, r>,atiJ c tfi� 5. Additional comments or questions: TWA"-- „"sfi " wa i- t e&- Nom- -t o. , I�-CZ CIAN, LA41 rCC.6 j u rk IL - is vbf (5)„+- 1, -r-G- Name: Email: ..Q a r'eiwi Z . i ' AL J Address: e�r?.AJ. Ci' Phone: IA. S. Cfi(a- - 3 -8�M Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes 1/ YYII�'4S MINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. finke(ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Comments: Much too Rapid J Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): ch too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe - - - • .. ce of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace o Ingle -Family Residential Comments: t . es of development: ltiple-Fanuly Residentia Commercial/Industrial None of These 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: ir•-•gyp„' •- ,, 1 • Address: f( Jc liL C �� N Phone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: No No No Comments: Comments: MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The infoiuiation is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe t. - - -.t .ace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe th- - ent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: -- 5. Additional continents or questions: Name: Emai.. ,--o. J _ Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Address: Phone: Please withhold my natne from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: No No No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dustv.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow ' Much too slow Nef K //7 ply .hfrseruciv-e 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: 0o Rapi. A good pace Too slow Much too slow 4. I the St Single -Family Residential Comments: e the pace of the following types of development: Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: hark( TOO (etil Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Address: Phone: Yes No No VIEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dustv.tinke( �ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe therecent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow. Comments: Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace �) / Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circleone): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace ( Too slow\ Much too slow Comments: ,`L) -A-1) . l n h�� In, ti/vy) (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential ) Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These ; L�d: (( �/-e,� > 1� \ + Comments: i,�5-� C� 1 � 4 ��`� ti "" L 0 -)";{"Lt -1 60(.71/ `'17 (C1lit.t(4'1,1 I U t 5. Additional comments or questions: h )� lijelbeVt ()9i,h c oa-c--f i ( f) 1^ 1 )).1)7)((: fi eLo r2 --z 4 .0 (no Name: Email: n vt.t/ u.Ivt, Address: LV 1 u`/, -, - Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: s) No Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: es j No Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: 'es) No Comments: MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. tinke i ci.medina.rnn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): 1\Iuch too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Comments: Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These 5. Additional continents or questions: '►v, %Q eFA c/ 0 A - sCkeio lS ry a ko„ukdGt Ai ire air -ea t./ 6verCrowd v rc Name: , , Email: v, tom,. • 0, 744,ww. Address: Phone: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes 1 ( CJ 4J 'U / V t/J C-4/ u/ -' ( 11/ No No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. tinke«ci.meciina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow Op M.O.fi )ly vekfroaAaS flM� J J. 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential develo.ment in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Comments: Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: 7 v V Address: Phone: i Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when -reproduced: Yes Yes 1 1 v - 1 I., v 1 No No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke)ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid ( Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow Comments: 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): ucI h too Rapid Comments: C -- Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow s�t� % S'�j 4 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: Address: Phone: Please contact me regarding. my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: No No No MEDINA Q Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact infonnation if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. tinkaeci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): iC1 telt too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Comments: Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: "\-Ccub-, (/)'� Address: ...-ne: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes pNo Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes l•� Please withhold my contact info, from this sheet when reproduced: ( Yes No MVI E D I NA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty. tinke(axi.rnedina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House I. I believe the recent pace of' single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): (\Inch too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): (\ Inch too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential ComrnerciaUIndustrial None of These Comments: 5: Additional comments or questions: Name: &-R-1—C., / t 4%DI/?5ON Email: I Address: - Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Yes No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City 'Planner dustv.finke( ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Comme Staging and Growth Open House ce of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential de - o'pmenti: Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial develo ent in e as been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid Comments: Too slow Much too slow 4 would support amending . - Staging/Gro a .lan to re• ce the pace }rrfoi owin of development: Single -Family Residentia ultiple-Family Residentia Commercial/lndustrial None of These Com nt . 5. Additional comments or questions: Name: Email: 1 1 Address: Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: l E Yes No No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dustv.frnke(a),ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow Comments: Medina is a incredibly special Twin Cities community. The sense of "city meets country" must be maintained to retain that quality, which only helps keep property values -- and the city's property tax revenues -- high. Let surrounding communities throw up developments by the dozens; Medina doesn't need to, and shouldn't, follow the herd. 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow Comments: A large condominium project dominated the Medina landscape (NE corner of 101N and 55) already. Again retain the quieter, natural landscape of the beautiful city of Medina by taking care to not allow more than a few rrrore-rmit=family devefopme nd those -should be--smatler-in scale). 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Single -Family Residential Multiple -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial None of These Comments: I support dramatically slowing down residential growth in the City of Medina to ensure the quality of life for existing residents as well as maintain the unique "city meets country" quality that makes Medina such a special place to live -- now and in the future. City officials are at a watershed moment and hold the future of Medina in their hands. Thank you for proceeding with caution and care. 5. Additional comments or questions: Thank you for giving community members a chance to share their views! My family moved to Medina from Plymouth several years ago and are so thankful to be active members of the community. We fully understand why other families would want to call Medina home but hope that city officials will make prudent, thoughtful -decisions about how to retain Medina -appeal by now--atfowirrg-overgrowth that would alter the beautiful quality of life here. Name: Heidi Pearson Email: I - •_._.r........... Address: Phone: (' Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No No MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House 1. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow • Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid CA —good pace Too slow Much too slow Comments: 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid Too Rapid (0d pace Too slow Much too slow Comments: (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: Multiple -Family Residentia Commercial/Industrial None of These 5. Additional comments or questions: Now seems to be a good time to throttle back on residential growth, especially large plats, consider: --The downsizing of Met Council's population projections, the foundation for growth forecasts. --The impending revisions of Medina's long-range plans. Continued rapid growth would impede meaningful discussion of what we want Medina to be in 10 or 20 years. --Associated long-range planning for infrastructure resources in general, including transportation, water, sewer, parks. --The increased current pressure western Hennepin County regional traffic capacity, especially in light of forecasts for no meaningful action in improving Hwy. 55. --A need to digest the rapid growth we already have seen in the past few years to see how it fits into the framework of the community, including city and regional services, satisfaction with where we are and how we are changing. Growth has the potential to add to the community but also to degrade quality of life. It's a delicate balance to seek, and Medina should take its time in seeking that balance. Name: Bob Franklin Address: 2819 Lakeshore Ave. Email: robert.franklin(a,mchsi.com Phone: 763-479-1777 Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: Yes Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes MEDINA Open House: Staging and Growth Plan/ Pace of Development Welcome, and thank you for attending! The purpose of the open house is to provide feedback and comments from residents, business owners, and property owners as the Planning Commission and City Council study the City's Staging/Growth Plan and the pace of development and growth. Information is available throughout the room and City staff are available to answer any questions you may have. The information is also included in the attached handouts. There will also be a brief presentation at the top and bottom of each hour with the same information. Please feel free to fill out any or all of the information below and on the back of this page. You only need to provide your name or contact information if you wish to do so. If you would like your name and contact information to be withheld from your comments when reproduced, please check the corresponding box below. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this matter at their September 9, 2014 meeting. Dusty Finke, AICP, City Planner dusty.finke a,ci.medina.mn.us (763) 473-8846 Staging and Growth Open House I. I believe the recent pace of single-family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): Much too Rapid oo Rapi. A good pace Comments: Too slow Much too slow 2. I believe the recent pace of multiple -family residential development in Medina has been (circle one): l<Ch too Rapid? Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow 3. I believe the recent pace of commercial/industrial development in Medina has been (circle one): Lii—�clt too Rapin7 Comments: Too Rapid A good pace Too slow Much too slow (over) 4. I would support amending the Staging/Growth plan to reduce the pace of the following types of development: nale-Family Residen Mul ' e -Family Residen l thanmercial/Industri None of These Comments: 5. Additional comments or questions: I think most Medina residents moved here in hopes of staying rural as long as we can. It has been alarming to see the construction already and hope we can slow the process as long as we can. Name: Email: Greg Nuss gregn@svl.com Address: 120 Sunrise Court Phone: 763-559-5710 Please contact me regarding my comments/questions: es Please withhold my name from this sheet when reproduced: Yes Please withhold my contact info. from this sheet when reproduced: Yes No Dusty Finke From: Ingrid Ney <ingrid.ney@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 5:17 PM To: Dusty Finke ___ Subject: _ City expansion Hi Dusty, My husband and I live in Medina for about 2 years with our two children. We love the city and know that others do as well. We think expanding is fine for Medina, as we also live in a development. If the city is getting bigger then it needs to expand more than just homes. The city needs to invest in more greenspace and parks. If you look at neighboring cities they have a lot to offer with community education, dog and skate parks. The little neighborhood playsets are not enough. Walking paths and bike trails are needed so we don't have to drive to other cities for all activities. I would also like to see a minimum lot size. What sets Medina apart is the nice open space with a rural feel. If lot sizes get down to the size of Plymouth, .2 acres, then Medina is just another suburb but with no unique charm, businesses or community offerings. Please consider more than just adding home after home and build onto the existing Medina community. Best Regards, Ingrid and Corey Ney 4549 Trillium Drive N Ingrid.ney a,gmail.com 1 Dusty Finke From: Kramer, Michelle L. <MLKramer@fedins.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 10:21 AM To: Dusty Finke; Kramer, Michelle L. Cc: Kramer, Kevin W. Subject: Development in Medina Hi Dusty, My husband and I were unable to attend either of the open houses hosted by the Medina City Council recently but as Medina residents, wanted to convey our sentiments regarding the proposed expansion of Medina. We are opposed to specific projects which have been brought forward to the city for review recently. Those two projects are The Dominium Project (proposed behind the Medina Ballroom) and the proposed project off of Arrowhead (118)/Mohawk and Highway 55. I believe the residents of Medina collectively voiced their concerns regarding the Dominium Project earlier this summer. I'm surprised that the city would even consider this proposal again given the valid and vehement objections raised by a large number residents. We believe there are numerous reasons why this project should not go forward at that location. The second project which was brought forward to the Medina Council is the proposed development off of Arrowhead(118) and hwy. 55. The reasons we have for objection to this project are as follows: 1. Arrowhead is a road with no updated curbs/gutters/storm sewers to handle the run-off of a development at this time 2. Arrowhead has currently just had an outlet from the Matteny Homes connecting to it which adds to the congestion at the intersection of highway 55 and Arrowhead. When OSI lets out of work and at the noon hour it is very congested at that intersection. Walking along Arrowhead is treacherous as there are no sidewalks or shoulders along this road. 3. Arrowhead becomes a dirt road which I believe is privately owned? There would definitely be an increase in traffic on that road with this proposed development which would be a burden to the owner of the road. 4. The number of trees that are proposed to be cut down and the wetlands that would be disturbed as a result of this development is staggering. If you physically look at the area D.R. Horton wants to develop, there is no possible way they could achieve this without damaging/disturbing the wetlands and displacing numerous wildlife that live there. Merely designating this as a P.U.D. (as the mayor suggested) will not significantly alter the development they presented. 5. The road that they would have to build to connect Mohawk to Arrowhead (someone ran a bobcat through there this Spring) would be a constant battle to maintain as it was underwater all Spring and early Summer. Once that road is completed, would it really be the builder's responsibility to maintain it once the development is completed or would that road that the farmer gave up trying to keep up, fall on the city taxpayers' shoulders? 6. There is no outlet for Polaris and the residents on Mohawk to turn left onto 55 and head East. If that road connects Mohawk to Arrowhead, then Arrowhead will have that traffic all crossing over so they can turn East onto 55. The traffic congestion on Arrowhead will border on ridiculous throughout the day. The council said that there is no plan in place to improve 55 until 2035? It seems that that needs to happen before an additional large development is added to this area? 7. We aren't saying not in our backyard, we are saying, why not suggest to the builders wanting to develop, a more viable solution. Why not concentrate on developing the farmland for sale on Hamel Road, west of downtown Hamel? Those parcels of land for sale were farmland and therefore are without forestation and wetlands that would be disturbed before, during and after the project. Because we were unable to attend the proposed development meetings we don't know if the D.R. Horton development is still on the table? We can only assume that the property owners are still pursuing selling this wetland area? If the council members/mayor take a serious physical look at this property, 1 you can verify that it should remain wetlands , especially if you are going to continue the development of Medina and displace more of the wildlife. Thanks for your time and consideration, Michelle and Kevin Kramer The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney -client or work product communication which is privileged and confidential. It may also contain protected health information that is protected by federal law. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and destroy (shred) the original message and all attachments. Any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message by any person other than the intended recipient(s) or their authorized agents is strictly prohibited. Thank you. 2 Dusty Finke From: Amy Alworth <aalworth@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 9:57 AM To: Dusty Finke Subject: Open House comments Good Morning Dusty, I am against amending the staging/growth plan because it sets a precedent. If this is amended a developer may, in turn, ask for an amendment of the staging/ growth plan to increase development. Please stick with the Comprehensive Plan as is. Thank you, Amy Alworth 1 Dusty Finke From: Lisa Tibbits <Lisa_Tibbits@datacard.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 3:27 PM To: Dusty Finke Subject: _ Medina planning Hi Dusty, I am unable to attend the meeting this week, but wanted to provide feedback on the planning issues for Medina. I strongly support taking a serious look at the housing density currently planned for Medina. I have voiced concerns previously during a Bridgewater neighborhood meeting with the Mayor. I understand that the Met Council has certain goals for Medina, but those were longer term goals. I caution the City to rush into trying to meet those density levels too quickly and certainly not without the appropriate infrastructure to support it. As an example, there is a current proposal for a neighborhood on the west side of Arrowhead Dr. The mayor noted that there would be no stop light adjustments for the Polaris intersection at Hwy 55. Therefore, if there is a new road built for that neighborhood with access off of Arrowhead, that means that not only will Arrowhead see additional traffic from the Fields of Medina, but also the new neighborhood and Polaris workers who will see it as a shortcut allowing the ability to make a left turn on 55. This is a single lane road (each way) with no paved shoulder. Already there has been an increase in traffic and 1 question the feasibility of adding additional density in that area without further infrastructure. There has been discussion about a bike/pedestrian lane along that area to allow a safe access way to the new park in Fields of Medina (to be built). Yet, apparently, that is not a requirement for this development. As a parent of two children that utilize that road, I am extremely concerned about the safety of children who use that road today and will continue to do so in the future, particularly given the planned increase in density and traffic. If the City wants to increase density, there should be a requirement to ensure proper infrastructure exists to support it. The above is only one example. I am sure there are others. If the Met Council wants density, have them lobby the other interested parties — the county and state - to add the requisite infrastructure. The Met Council has recently reduced the density requirements/recommendations and I -think Medina should similarly adjust its plan and also require that adequate infrastructure exists prior to approving ANY plan. We should not build neighborhoods for the sake of simply satisfying a density number without due consideration to the broader impact on the community. Medina is a wonderful place to live, but the recent plans for density make it seem like Medina is striving to be Plymouth. Keep in mind, many left Plymouth to move to Medina because of the more rural feel and the abundance of nature and open spaces. I think most residents support a certain standard that should be maintained and allowing builders to come in with high density projects without adequate infrastructure is not in the best interest of our community. Thank you for your consideration. Lisa J. Tibbits SVP, General Counsel and Secretary DataCard Corporation 11111 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55340 (952) 988-2811 (952) 465-2951 (mobile) 1 Dusty Finke From: Brad Smith <bsmith@christopherandbanks.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 10:11 AM To: Dusty Finke Subject: Pace of -Development in Medina Good morning, Dusty. My name is Brad Smith and I'm a resident of Bridgewater in Medina. I know there is an open house this evening to discuss concerns about the pace of residential development in Medina. I am out of town on business this week and unable to attend. But I did want to take the opportunity to express my view in hopes you and your colleagues can fully consider it when planning for our communities continued growth and development. We love Medina specifically because the community has achieved the perfect blend of rural charm and urban accessibility. My family and I are opposed to any more accelerated development plans that would compromise that balance sooner than necessary. Further, we are concerned that development would outstrip infrastructure quickly if we aren't very, very judicious and measured in how quickly to develop the community. With the Met Council having reduced Medina's projected growth rate, we're concerned that the community will base growth on outdated data. Thanks once again for listening to the concerns of residents. We appreciate your commitment to the community and challenges ahead. Regards, Brad Smith Brad Smith Vice President, eCommerce & Digital Marketing Christopher & Banks BSmith(caChristopherandBanks.com (0) 763.551.2813 (C) 612.239.3223 1 Dusty Finke From: Nicole Nye <nnye@olson.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 9:31 AM To: Dusty Finke -Subject: — A resident point of view on land development in -Medina. Dusty, I appreciate you setting up meetings to get input on the pace of land development in Medina. Unfortunately I will be unable to make tonight's meeting, but wanted to express my thoughts and concerns. I currently reside at 4429 Bluebell Trail S. in the Bridgewater neighborhood. I have lived there for just over two years. Previously we lived in Plymouth just behind Greenwood Elementary School. When we had our third child, we needed more space, and started looking for our next home. For us, nothing came close to Medina. We loved the open spaces, the lack of development and the feeling of being away from much of the development and commercialism in Plymouth, Maple Grove and surrounding suburbs. We were disappointed to learn soon after moving in about the Fields of Medina neighborhood, which has sprung up to the east of us, and about the plans for the land development directly to the west of us near OSI. We continue to see "Proposed Development" signs everywhere we go, and are very disheartened that the City is allowing this pace of development. Our major concerns if this continues at the pace that you have allowed: 1. The Toss of green spaces and parks. Medina is known for its green spaces, larger acreage and "country" feel. If development continues at the pace we've seen in the last two years, we're concerned about the loss of green space, parks, wetlands, etc. 2. Overcrowding of our schools. You are allowing the Wayzata public schools to become so overcrowded that they are struggling to keep up with the pace of building (granted this is not only Medina, but Plymouth as well). 3. Infrastructure. Do we have plans for the development of roads and commercial infrastructure to support the plans for these increases in the population of Medina? And, will this develop at a pace commensurate with the residential development? 4. The loss of community. With such an accelerated development approach, I'm concerned about the loss of community and "small town feel" that we've come to love in Medina. Thank you for considering multiple view points on land development. I hope you share my desire to protect what is so special about Medina. Nicole Nye 4429 Bluebell Trail S. Media, MN 55340 Nicole Nye I Vice President of Marketing 1 o:612.215.3508 1 m:612.877.0575 1 nnve@olson.com www.olson.com Olson: Revolutionizing Engagement olson.com 1 Dusty Finke From: Dick Lueck <dicklueck@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 6:39 AM To: Dusty Finke Subject: Medina Growth Mr. Finke, I am not able to attend the session tonight on Medina growth, but I wanted to express my concern with the amount of growth and high density housing. We purchased in Medina to get away from the high density housing. Medina offered a "different type of living" and that was why we moved to Medina. In case you didn't recognize, the values of our property has declined significantly since the housing meltdown. If Medina continues to expand with uncontrolled growth, the values of existing properties will not improve. I understand the need to have "some growth" but let's get back to the values that caused many of us to move to Medina. Let's not allow growth and high density housing to ruin what Medina has to offer please! Thanks for listening (I hope). 1 Dusty Finke From: Connie Fourre <conniefourre@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:26 AM To: Dusty Finke Subject: Met Council Projections Hi Dusty, My husband and I will be out of town for both meetings on the pace of development in Medina. I'm writing to express our strong hope that Medina will slow the pace of development in light of the Met Council's new projections. I'm sure you've heard our reasoning a million times: keep Medina's unique character, preservation of open and farm land for environmental reasons, we just like it better that way. Please register our vote in the slow -growth camp. Thanks, Connie Fourre and Tom Mayer 2755 Hunter Drive Hamel 1 AGENDA ITEM: 9 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231 .2555 Facsim ile: 763.231 .2561 planners@nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Medina Planning Commission FROM: Nate Sparks DATE: September 4, 2014 RE: 22 Hamel Place Site Plan Review CITY FILE: LR-14-137 Application Date: June 2, 2014 Review Deadline: November 15, 2014 (extended by applicant) BACKGROUND Farhad Hakim has made an application for a site plan review for an eight unit two-story apartment building located at 22 Hamel Road. The Planning Commission tabled the request at the August meeting seeking revisions to the plan. PROJECT SITE & DESCRIPTION The site is located at the northeastern corner of Hamel Road and Brockton Lane south of the railroad tracks. The property is guided for a Mixed Use -Business land use in the Comprehensive Plan. The site is zoned UH-2, Uptown Hamel -2. The general area is a mix of general commercial and residential uses. The site is currently a vacant lot. In the Uptown Hamel Concept Plan, this parcel was shown for high density residential housing. Apartment buildings are a permitted use within the district. The applicant proposes a two-story apartment building with a detached garage behind it. The apartment building is proposed to have 8 units. Four units are on each level. Laundry facilities are provided within the units. SITE PLAN REVIEW The site and building plans were reviewed to determine compliance with the standards of the Uptown Hamel -2 District: Building Setbacks The Ordinance requires that buildings be setback no more than 10 feet from the right-of-way. The building is proposed to be 10 feet from the sidewalk along Hamel Road. An eight foot side yard setback is required, which is being met. The applicant's survey makes it appear as though the sidewalk is not within the right-of-way easement. This should be confirmed. An easement dedication may be required. Architectural Standards The building is proposed with cement board siding and attached rock on the exterior of the building. The ordinance requires balconies and porches facing the street on buildings such as this. There are two overhanging balconies facing the street. These are exceeding the minimum width standard of six feet. The building was revised to include two balcony type enclosures around the front ground level porches. The building was initially proposed to meet modulation standards by using different building materials. The Planning Commission requested a greater deal of articulation and relief to meet this standard instead. Therefore, the plan was revised to include a one foot bump out on each side of the building and a hip on the eastern side of the roof. The applicant also proposes an option where the hip is replaced by a portion of flat roof. The applicant also widened the lower, street -facing level windows to depict conformance with the minimum district standard of 30% windows on the street level. Parking & Driveways The applicant is proposing 15 surface parking stalls and one 8 stall garage building behind the principal structure. One stall per unit is required to be inside. The ordinance encourages underground parking but allows for surface level parking when the structure meets the minimum architectural standards of the district and is "consistent with the scale of the development." The eastern stalls in the garage will be more difficult to get in and out of but the applicant has proposed bump -outs on the north and southeastern sides of the building which Staff believes will make this acceptable. The drive aisle entering the site and to the west of the garage have been reduced from 24 feet in width to 22 feet. The typical City engineering standard for two-way traffic is 24 feet. The lessened width is due to the landscaping area next to the garage and the bump -outs on the building. The driveway ordinance requires a 2.5 foot setback for the driveway. The proposed driveway is 2 feet from the property line. This may be permitted with a waiver from the City Council. Alternatively, the drive aisle could be located six inches closer to the structure. The structure is currently proposed approximately 2 feet from the drive aisle. Impervious Surfaces The maximum allowed percentage of impervious surfaces is 90%. This project is proposed to have 80%. Grading & Drainage There is a current storm water pipe along the eastern edge of the property. This is proposed to move slightly to the east. The applicant is also seeking to vacate a portion of the easement the storm pipe is located in. The City Engineer's comments are attached. Tree Preservation & Landscaping The property has 170 inches of trees on site. One tree is proposed to be preserved, a 10 inch elm in the front of the building. After allowed removals, the applicant will need to replace 72 inches of trees. The applicant may wish to plant additional trees on the site, perhaps in the rear by the trash enclosure. The remainder could be planted off -site. A landscaping plan has been provided focusing on the perimeter of the building. The applicant may wish to include additional landscaping in the rear of the lot, especially near the aforementioned trash enclosure. A fence has been added in this area. The applicant has adjusted the plan to include a 2 foot wide strip of landscaping area west of the garage. A revised landscaping plan will need to be submitted. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The building and site plan generally meet the requirements of the Uptown Hamel -2 District. Therefore, Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide an easement for the sidewalk, if necessary. 2. The landscaping plan shall be revised to provide additional plantings in the rear of the lot adjacent to the trash enclosure. 3. A tree replacement plan shall be provided. 4. The detached garage shall meet the building standards of the district. 5. All comments of the City Engineer shall be addressed. 6. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the site plan, construction plans, and other relevant documents. Attached: Aerial Photo Engineer's Comments Applicant's Revised Plan Set 8/6/2014 Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map Parcel ID: Owner Name: 12-118-23-41-0011 Fez Jon Parcel 22 Hamel Rd Address: Medina, MN 55340 Property Vacant Land -Residential Type: A -T -B: Torrens Market Total: $163,000 Tax $4,849.04 Total: (Payable: 2014) Sale Price: Home- stead: Non -Homestead Sal Parcel 0.57 acres Sale Area: 25,023 sq ft Code: $160,000 02/2014 Vacant Land Map Scale: 1" = 400 ft. Print Date: 8/6/2014 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 http://g i s.co.hennepi n.rm.us/Property/pri nt/default.asp)C?C=458836.3018500004,4987610.438650002&L=6&T=hybrid&D=true&LI D=0&F ID=1211823410011 &VIS... 1/2 8/6/2014 Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map nHIi4 VI CCf1. http://g is.co.hennepin.rm.us/Property/print/default.aspM=458836.3018500004,4987610.438650002&L=6&T= hybrid&D=true&LID=O&FID= 1211823410011 &VIS... 2/2 WSB engineering- planning• environmental. construction August 6, 2014 Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: City Project: Hamel Place Site Plan WSB Project No. 2712-050 Dear Dusty: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the revised site plan submittal dated August 4, 2014 for the Hamel Place8-unit apartment building located at 22 Hamel Road. Comments from our July 8, 2014 review are shown below with updated responses shown in red. 1. Plan and profile views of the relocated storm sewer should be included in future plan submittals. Plans dated July 24, 2014 shown the profile view of the storm sewer. The plans should be revised to show all storm sewers to be RCP and not HDPE. 2. The origin and date of the survey must be shown on the plans. Completed. 3. The plans prepared by Gronberg and Associates disagree in many ways with the architectural drawings. Some of the disparities include the size of the garage, the location of the garage, the concrete pad and stepping stones are missing on the survey, trash enclosure location, parking lot location, garage setback from the rear lot line, and garage stall widths. These are just some of the differences that need to be corrected so that the survey and architectural plans agree. Garage plans submitted agree with survey. 4. The plans should identify the existing sanitary sewer service size. Calculations should be provided to verify the existing sanitary stub has the capacity to serve the proposed development. Not completed. 5. A storm sewer should be stubbed to the northwest corner of the site and a catch basin installed to pick up drainage from that location. Completed, storm sewer pipe type should be changed to RCP. 6. The proposed parking lot spot elevations shown west of the garage and the proposed garage floor elevation appear to direct parking lot drainage to the garage. The grading plan should be revised or additional detail provided showing drainage will be directed away from the garage. Corrected. 7. Concrete curb and gutter should be shown around the perimeter of the parking areas. Plans have been updated to include B612 concrete curb and gutter around the perimeter of the parking lot. Hamel Place Site Plan August 6, 2014 Page 2 8. We will provide more detailed comments on the proposed garage once the civil and architectural plans agree. Access to the eastern most two garage stalls will be difficult for larger vehicles. 9. The access from Hamel Road to the site should be designed with grades at 2% or less for at least 50 — feet north of the existing sidewalk. Completed. 10. The plans should clearly show all removals. It does not appear the 22" spruce shown in the middle of the lot near the front of the proposed building will survive the construction and should be shown as a removal. 11. The plans should show how rooftop drainage will be collected and where it will be routed. Preferably the drainage should be routed to the storm sewer system. 12. A temporary construction easement will be required from the properties east and west of the subject property to construct the proposed improvements. The applicant shall provide copies of these easements prior to final site plan approval. 13. The proposed bituminous spillway shown between the garage and the proposed building along the east side of the parking lot should be changed to concrete with concrete curb and gutter around the perimeter. Please contact me at 612-209-5113 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. 1c4•1—' Tom Kellogg 0 IT LEGEND za,N 32-131,4 F 5,4 NASA aea 10" A;H rcw-x ** 1 • BORNTA� EA, UAW 12 2: �r DAnxv'FR.wrvRe1112Ne 45 3_) A l-brA i wwo 24 4 HrcRar n, 4,m3EaE - 6 • Liu, Rrira Kaim 5 Revision #: 22 HAMEL RC Scale: Landscape Plan: Landscape Design by: GARRETL GARDNER Date: 7/1/2014 1/16"= r LEAPFROG CONSTRUCTION GREEN SCENE LANDSCAPE CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR LEAPFROG CONSTRUCTION IN LOTS 37, 38 & 40, AUD. SUB. NO. 241 HENNEPIN CO. 1 , II NNESOTA \ �QO LINE SAIL \ NN. OAD f \ ---4.- `\'...; _____E—Tl \ 1w„ozae \ \\ \ yW1012.W NG-4'71.PE T R '1020.0 \\ �� \ PROP 28' 12" HOPE -� SEAR N.N.�p�ay� \ STORM \ \ ja , I STORM SEWER -- —"`F-� \MANHOLE 112 I \\ \\ _�' Tw:II,1 3508 w WV, 1 \ \ \ L-107. 0 ----- ,,=-03.0-7.46„ S. INV=101109 PROPOSED=1022 B CATCHIs1 RIM INV=1018.0 \ \ \)o, \\ N \ PROPOSED 8612\ CONCRETE GURB GUTTE AROUNDPERIMET R• PARKING LOT BW =1027. eW=10273 NW CORNER 2W.1020 5 Z OF LOT 3 BW•10280 50 LINE PARALLEL TO WEST LINE OF LOT 3o PROPOSED I RETAINING WALL WEST LINE OF LOT 38 NORTH LINE OF LOT 39 rp �BW.1023.2 NE CORNER OF LOT 39 0 0 0 N O / 8 EXISTING ATE`N�L.i „ Ex STINGSgNITARY SEWER _ HAMEC RpAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES: Lot 37, Auditor's Subdivision No. 241, Hennepin County, Minn. Lot 38, Auditor's Subdivision No. 241, Hennepin County, Minn., except that part of said Lot 38 described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 38; thence south along the west line of said Lot 38 to the northeast corner of Lot 39, Auditor's Subdivision No. 241; thence east along the north line of said Lot 39 extended to a point 107 feet west of the east line of Lot 37, Auditor's Subdivison No. 241, measured at right angles thereto; thence north parallel to the west line of Lot 38 to the north line of said Lot 38; thence west along the north line of said Lot 38 to the point of beginning. Lot 40, Auditor's Subdivision No. 241, Hennepin County, Minn, except that part of said Lot 40 lying westerly of a line drawn parallel to and 107 feet westerly, measured at right angles, from the most easterly line of said Lot 40. This survey shows the boundaries and topography of the above described property, and the proposed location of two proposed buildings and parking lots. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. • : Iron marker found D : Iron marker set — : Existing contour line, mean sea level datum — -- : Proposed contour line : Proposed spot elevation X : Denotes tree to be removed Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum NOTE: Catch basins and manholes were located in the field. Additional utilities shown are from city records. NOTE: Survey information is from field work by Gronberg & Associates REVISIONS on April 18, 2014. PROPOSED 26 LF 24' NDPE 0 81% W.1019 5 PROPOSED CATCH BASIN RIM=1020 0 INV 0012.29 \ 00 4,, 8861E12. HOPE 81M•10210 INV=1015.0 EXPOSED FUNDATIDN UTILITY AND AINAGE EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 40547 (NEEDS TO BE DUCED TO 8 FEET TO MATC PROPOSED BUILD NGS AS SH WN). ALSO, STORM, SEWER NEEDS TO BE MOVED TO THE NEV l I l EXISTING STORM SEWER 59 LF 24' HDPE10.84% PROPOSEDISTORM SEWER PROPOSED 871..F 24' MOPE, 0.81% 7 OPOSED 8' DRAINAGE 0 UTILITY EASEMENT -ROPOSEDCRMH RIM•1023 0 I V = 1012.93 I O PR POSED ) BIT INDUS I SPILLWAY AND AIPRAP N 1 N I I U1 ' i v 0 I O I I l z / / / / II 1 / / PROPOSED,33 LF / / 24" 07E, 0.81% 1 / / / / / 1 / I / / r / i 1 / / I I / / 7 * d m E R / / ELDER / PROPOSED / CBMH RIMINV. 14- 22.5 7 / .0 TEL STSS RESTE O-7--- 1p 0a �SED754 7y, FMENT / ___L �`�MANHOLE II I II W IIZ a J I IZ 0 I03- V ICL / 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 80 HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS LOT 27022+- S.F. LOT - CITY STREET AND SIDEWALK 1416 NET 25606+- S.F. BUILDING GARAGE BLACKTOP PATIOS FRONT WALK BACK WALK WALLS 6302+- S.F. 2016+- 11120+- 240+- 102+- 296+- 248+- TOTAL 20324+- S.F. 20324/25606 = 79.37% PROPOSED HARDCOVER DATE S12-14 9-29-14 6-30-14 7.23-14 8-4-14 9.2.14 9-4-14 BY TRASH ENCLOSURE ¢cMENT ADDED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISED DESIGNEE' DRAWN CHECKEC I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. REVISED —1 REVISED DATE 9-a-,' MINN. LICENSE NUMBER /27S% 4-18-14 1"=20' 14-127 GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNERS 445 N. WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN 55356 PHONE: 952-473.4141 FAX: 952-473-4435 CONSLLTA T CODE DATA APPLICABLE CODES. CITY of %.tyEp 1>1A , NVA 1atrMEPIWUMY, MAW O COOL drat MNf50W SUIE MANG COOS q 1711 NE'IIpNIS >[aN NmOM mMII Fl( COOS W/ STATE AARA 1ETITS le e I N E50N ADM coD£ kl4V i'I SS _•° I eAkNA MEOWICAI CODE W/ SWE OF 11N*SOTA:AII1 O &MIS ltoL WOK 1LL EILL. COOS CHAPTER 3. OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION (SEC. 302) GROUP SECTION DESCRIPTION OF OCCUP ANCY PROPOSED S.F. t2-./. tb. t 8 uNtr 1esitrEA4p Alr 11-4)/.0 (d11tT -k f4 IT F -474 V2 s > TOTAL PROPOSED (2 32o M AO OCC. ARATION ITA�BLE eoza81 OCCUPA NCY TYFES REQUIRED SEPERATION (HOURS) 112-1 1 1:iit. - CHAPTER 8. GENERAL BUILONG LIMITATIONS SECTION ALLOWABLE AREA PICRi1SE (S.E) TAME 507 5012 506.3 TYPE NU ARE A INCREASE :41f0-$PWtlOER TOTAL AltllM161E AREA Iz2 io t:-©ao — looj 29. 1400 TOTAL, ALLOWABLE AREA 1.9ooev s' ALLOW ABLE t®BFTT (SEC. 504) USE GROUP CMSTRIKTX7M TYPE wawa OE STORES MAXAAY FXAYDR& 1 ECNr PROPOSED N AM Of STO WS PROPOSED DAUMO iECta a 2- -St A +t 'So' "I -It' CHAPTER 6. CONSTRUCTION TYPES/REQUIREMENTS SECTION TYPE REQUIREMENTS (TABLE 601) REQE CFP10 W/ 7(CFPTgN 60I 9g KARR16 OPUS -WSW BEARfG MIIS 44 193:4 MOM -&M G WALL - EXTEROR STRUCTURAL MALE minors R0075 6 Rooffiz m 1 Na I 10 D 101 t 161 • NR 1 MR CHAPTER 9. FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM S SECTION TYPE DESCRIPTION OF REQISREUENTS a01,9.1. t• 'sit, f c1'£ AL4 -44 IA,/ AI,A -NL 64"artc4. tN -p.. ' BIMDM O FULLY SPRAW LED CHAPTER 10. MEANS OF EGRESS/OCCUPANT LOAD USE OCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR AREA a FACTOR OCCUPANT LOAD t2^2 1,40 11-% • o' G 4ce cr2- TOTAL OCCUPANTS tot. EM T WITH REQt MENT8 (TABLE 10082.* T TOTALTOED DH USE STAR WrM Eli pR [WJ0ZP. MD VA .2. 0.15 12'4- .2)(101-. A1A .is X07`-' .y 11-4 1441 MARK: D ATE 65LE F OR 1 '1 � 04401 - PO STAN I ROSS I x104 N 0Wttt DR AWN 6Y: SI�t CHECKE D IN: 5R PROECT DILE %kAM E ?L ACE. 22 *4'i. �U �/lt>tl1A , M41 SLEET TAIL' Go Di `BATA At ��llgllll��npgiq�� f - Of-Stt r, + tote, . C 49 WI f 207 %nr, c 612 396 4556 tr` wax -LYf1vH t• tlotre c," C Li G' i , �1vv¢ (r'. ra�n&p '. '64f'k.n. T 41-tfa'atft4C-A 011 EL VAV k7 {�ttµ !loll s tair Ftx ti.1 I 12'0` 1Z�0" 4t ;-. ® AF—As61 E- -PLA FI --,2xq t-tA (TT?), 41441, ,e,,py1 f C'�yS > 2 2)c10 VJoro 14. 1' C gal `utxY- t�b/f_ Il et! 7 l.ta {I1 R('eM.l.el J.w vdf� (6i EN CY o 'riep :d 2 'T"),1 2-1- 15 1e9 ✓ -,� ` cv�a a°T I MEL SST `rtrA11 P -NT M1 fi -trim <s� G1VIUtt� F F�jAtrca * le14LL5 T-114 MAW DAM sIu[ rat 1.2 .‘ .14 etk1Jbv, 6 'Ls'l4- GtT./ Gt{7lIV�-'S k Wed STAN R w 24182 raam.M .w/e,w.r N O VACE 9.Je MANN Mt S.yt m JOI OATS P1/4014. to 11 .11- nlolxr mm 1-la�� 'FLA GE- t4A, tillta Mar DU tT 'L 4i pe5t' r tAtz,tt+k.. 4rA prl tN co -pr C.(2,49, . 5 kPA t7Nfr TQ 440t,1 sot- ecintret kGGFos--tesl� Ai \MIT To t E ,Ae, C-. y15LL SlF1r 1<t-te-t 1.1 ,Wel- Giat, eP- WIID 9E_ C14_a A bA „ va'NEG LIF1L I. % cfcce. 4 11G IAN P- Will. 1,1A - re -t2 - trop tyOA bA oPT 40 KS4 ALIJi1G4W FLnptz fL At� 13=tD -V DM 4Lt SPY 4./40.. 4'yt. »o[- VCRcottc RAv tllu ut MiI. 1 1- o itv ollED L1b)tGFj'if 13aysoM 2 t^R {tutkt et! ALL tti0 vH�l O-T1r VAt , FLt7v12--- kftst n Stoe t i11rt s., 4 t 1 b +1Mt ta " tvvt Atxou`f 5 tl4Ytly. 1V,4"_ 1 _s„ de ,�,ayn 2b to A 4s 1,+ r_ ..cown f <0,51 20/ g3Z c 612 396 4556 MARK: D ATE OLE ROIL t Th2-l4 s14,1442pib4}roe ,i I1�e�� y �MM♦II�w/W,w��/s��!MM r,� �Rrq+A r,ltlw�tl__Nw* _ M<i Ap� "iMMr,�N yKMr MM �MM�rb arta RANI ROW R w 24.02 N OMR Ok S� DRAWN RD CEO® RM 1011 Not Ao14- o to DAM 7. 1'1 • t4^ Sat. 9.)t PRRRNCT TIM to ptt�a , MCA MT MIA YPIGAL- F>_on� PLAT AbA �t_a� ®eOttD FLoog,. PLC boor 2}4D,)1. - Io •d:i'd Al, 3' 1 x z' Al.lThn kthC. ,cU.yFe. voot.H .71 H t40:1112n4AI FP`+A*1L9 FP+�t�YVtMA T FitP4' A�+ E I0 1 1, 'ICI ,1-e,,, ‹» yyon -4. % '1'-7. 11 �L 1't �(t.4,i. 6440-, 9- I- sc. (r�CD t, 14fM „ '• 20 L „ ., ,sLe. ‘I 'Op- , Gi ucJeF . c1.,o h 0'7 n ,1 - I, ,, „ 'LP 4i 5C: 4100 E7 1-1M t� T 1, ,+ "' " - 1i 1 Gt4/4✓1 ^P it ., , I „ ,. tn5 n a � ,: „ 2DS „ ,i II. „ „ V 2O io 7 If zoo tae! i1 0 „ ,, I I °1 a Alf1 s'1 At fl 114 a 1lb 4- 04 ci) FtrkS T Roo ?L-°Ati t10 „ t GESICit4 f 451 267 8329 c 612 396 4556 AVM 0Allk MA FO R t 1+2t t4 at.11Eg 04)11'6E47 0,;LS.IA SIN 4"-krie5 W M. M,MNMwA M° Wed STAN i IoOB:. okotoke Ns 24°162 '. N ONE MAIM 55 01100D 1111: 5.R JOB 11134 A14.010 DAM 3•VI. t4 5.R F ROXT 7tit8 HAM -L. 22 4tL 1:v . , 1t-1 SST 7IR! Ft pgT S� c otes Loo{Z PLAt4 R dth�9n Zbv.tA r f05(2.07B32.0/ c 612 396 4556 1 — "c't fie- 41A17 ( L 1 1 d -je b' r r--140 /^ 61ALL 4F1 ^4 112 xILI Li 146 rtto 41"1 t -1 iB (iR 'i%�2i NS✓L ,. ;clacewl I ,'1 1_,,h 400 FoVR 0AT01I ' Tt-ar1 Mfg" `.e. WON DAR ®.Z P t 1 -24 .1 4- Olb1eF (1L41 h z. f) . '25 14 4 1T1 'rt «:r * IM aR 1M lY M New el * "MUMS RaNtra Ha 24182 N CHUM 8Jt f tAYM tY: ON= n ". S.!{ DAR MOM' Ma 4AMA L 22 }{4MAL fix, r'ca7!♦► 411DIA A4 .1 I�.�t. g -A itel vt11r ASFF'ft,tv l' �i+tlkv tzo 5 .ti .4/ Rhro l ' yUA k 44"p 6t) '" La" .. . _ x4- TFro t -to ✓`f(, 1p - .10 1. 51 al3 C1 ay - t , F L\r• f1 L E LEVAT 1 co't-1 O ( i G LS .,". ' 4twrt•-> t)eTA t L- t��11'-11.,9'r Vb II A ,1^ , twr 0`f? 2.V STEP, S'?, VerrT '0,41, LIT -1.11 Vkr 9`I- 94j+(Y.(Li sIt W[' 1517 'FLA �v t n, 1,-) S t, Tt ' 1 4 ptk. , cal Flit.- IA. a -1'T frL- - P 4IL, pt:G�ll'1q to #. 14v 1,12V`,"' W/ iVilN: YA 1 fryll/ JetaTlrly, ,hrr'T , §, Ci f the '14 ap¢ �TIeATIt�L ,i'tiL`T NJ tcr� ht1� V-1 " Nd TiPleAL exT• �JAtL - .. F4 I- ©f- t+lo y. ..v4p-L4 A 'AT Ctt. e xr co l? , x V yiI5D, ',ye Cal? tin a +'h- 1.,A -TT IN5V1.- -ivp+CAA. VI_ noe sy�, - ' 1; 4141'1 ``•Jc r� - t / Sib m1� GEIL»1(. PRt."1 Gcot FJOfWOto-. 4. ray SMg a 11 -v41 . }StIC s errl/. itn .y- Frio L L,LL IaF Mq is J1pr G q,r"m.c., Garth f -To - "TIP 1.11�LL e ,vc lOc V12 .1, V 1"=- 1'. ,,i TI -1 l©rl FLE,/ sINl1LAr.) r t II f 451 207 8329 c 612 396 4556 MANIC DAIS DU lab 1 721.14 0t{ - 4ktisit 45. i4 Gily 1E/rt ,'t M wtflrr,b_Y era ST AN 1 R 4SS Rlj daltil b 2ti192. w SI WAGS S .R CRAM . C HOW lit 5Jit KS 110. DAM Ali-ato •2 •41.14 line HA tit 1 — ?LA C_ 2Z i44 4/1E C121-2 Meti �tiie Ml .NET MID E L_es ./A-j1ot-1.S k WALL e1100