Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutORD14938 BILL NO. 2011-158 SPONSORED BY COUNCILMAN Schulte ORDINANCE NO. 14q- 3-y AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, CHANGING, AMENDING, AND MODIFYING THE ZONING MAP OF THE ZONING CODE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, BY REZONING 0.93 ACRES FROM C-O OFFICE COMMERCIAL TO C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, FOR LAND ADDRESSED AS 999 DIAMOND RIDGE, DESCRIBED AS LOT 86 OF DIAMONDS SUBDIVISION, SECTION FOUR, JEFFERSON CITY, COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI. WHEREAS, It appears that the procedures set forth in the zoning code relating to zoning have in all matters been complied with. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The following described real estate is rezoned from C-O Office Commercial to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial: Lot 86 of the Diamonds Subdivision, Section Four, Jefferson City, Cole County, Missouri, containing 0.93 acres. Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval. Passed: (/ ��� ��� rir>� Approved: 2 o Q Presiding O r Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk hit6m City Counselor PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Rezoning for 999 Diamond Ridge The City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, will hold a public hearing on Monday, March 19, 2012 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street, to consider a proposal to rezone property addressed as 999 Diamond Ridge from C-O Office Commercial to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial. The property is described as Lot 86 of Diamonds Subdivision, Section Four, Jefferson City, Cole County, Missouri. Containing 0.93 acres. Phyllis Powell, City Clerk, City of Jefferson, Missouri P.T. - Friday, March 2, 2012 For contact information purposes only: Contact Anne Stratman or Janice McMillan Department of Community Development/Planning Division 320 East McCarty Street, Room 120, Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Phone (573) 634-6475 Fax (573) 634-6457 EXCERPT OF UN-APPROVED MINUTES JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION February 9, 2012 5:15 p.m. COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT ATTENDANCE RECORD Jack Deeken 8 of 8 Dean Dutoi 7 of 8 Bob George 5 of 8 Chris Jordan, Vice Chairman 7 of 8 Michael Lester 8 of 8 Ralph Robinett, Chairman 7 of 8 Scott Stacey 8 of 8 Chris Yarnell 7 of 8 Bunnie Trickey Cotten, Alternate 7 of 8 Dale Vaughan, Alternate 8 of 8 COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT ATTENDANCE RECORD David Nunn 6 of 8 EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT Shawn Schulte, City Council Liaison Bill Luebbert, Fourth Ward Councilman STAFF PRESENT Janice McMillan, Director of Planning & Protective Services Eric Barron, Senior Planner Drew Hilpert, Associate City Counselor Anne Stratman, Administrative Assistant Public Hearings Case No. P12002 — 999 Diamond Ridge; Rezoning from C-O to C-1. Application filed by Max and Ann Fisher, property owners, to rezone 0.93 acres from C-O Office Commercial to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial. The property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Emerald Lane and Diamond Ridge and is described as Lot 86 of Diamonds Subdivision Section 4, Jefferson City, Missouri. (Gavin Bargate, Consultant) Mr. Barron described the proposal and explained that this request is for an existing two story office building. He stated that a portion of the lower level is vacant and the property owner wishes to lease the lower level to a Salon/Day Spa tenant. Mr. Barron explained that Salon/Day Spas are defined by the Zoning Code as a "personal services" use and are not permitted in the C-O zoning district. He stated that the property owner is proposing a rezoning of the property to C-1 in order to permit the proposed use. Mr. Barron explained that the property owner spoke to affected neighbors and received letters of support from the majority of them. He stated that the rezoning will not affect the office use as office uses are permitted in the C-1 zoning district. Mr. Barron explained that the Comprehensive Plan Development Plan map currently identifies this property as being intended for commercial use and the proposed rezoning would be a continuation of the C-1 zoning pattern on the north side of Emerald Lane, Mr. Max Fisher, 999 Diamond Ridge, spoke regarding this request and explained that a portion of the lower level is currently occupied by a law firm and the remaining space will be occupied by a salon/day spa. Mr. Fisher explained that he contacted both residential and commercial property owners in the area and explained that the proposed rezoning is to accommodate LaSienne Salon and Day Spa. He stated that he secured a letter of support from each property owner except for one person who was not sure whether they opposed or supported the proposed request. Mr. Fisher explained that he has an interest in the type of tenants that occupy this building not only as a property owner but because he has his Edward Jones office on the upper level. No one spoke in opposition to this request. Excerpt of Un-Approved Minutes Page 2 February 9, 2012 Correspondence in support of this request was received from the following individuals: John & Mary Bono, 995 Diamond Ridge Double Vision Enterprises, 1001 Diamond Ridge & 1004 Diamond Ridge Louis Phelps, 986 Diamond Ridge Thomas &Vicky Williams, 991 Diamond Ridge Alan Spears, 990 Diamond Ridge Joseph & Brenda Scheppers, 817 Weatherhill Road Nathalie Tungesvik, LLC, 994 Diamond Ridge Edgewood Development, LLC, 994 Diamond Ridge Mr. Barron gave the Planning Division staff report. Mr. Dutoi moved and Mr. Stacey seconded to recommend approval of the request to rezone the property from C-O to C-1 to the City Council. The motion passed 8-0 with the following votes: Aye: Deeken, Dutoi, George, Jordan, Lester, Stacey, Yarnell, Cotten. City of Jefferson Planning & Zoning Commission LOCATION 1 ,r (7�.1 �i� '`t y� n t , A�` itr 4 y kl h i s•L s++Y 1 t+ A -z� 1 1 7 4 + s✓d ��;71 i�t6 Ilt Ithtt x a IfiIL Q a� , i r�faali�fi��t�71��+��I1��P�}r iyk, 17t - �`km '�r ter,hWt,r 1"" �1 4 A � R 31 r � 6i I �,f'i� , j � 1 J at y t t'• it Alt i � tik yy 11 S I � EMERALDLN +, A r5t tkv �� t nr`ikj4 t�71�, �ry>s 1 i to s r loft in �t�r,hrtitettsac dia tat 1 ., '1— ^ ,., tr a r ,� IF r t 4 1 M 1 t 41.......u'�� 1�4`.'rr � i +m i871 l ti7,It ; i) t i +S#ztt- . P ,a 11 + `�'t�"�`4�� �1 �'� � � •'• I aJ . , hf tq fre � t,a,P '.. � E_ til it it Ml t t11 vv ED n �n to � 1 t;. jjj��� S tFau�sA�l,,en , w '� Fionelno3 e raw ar�'r ; .n N 0 125 250 500 Feet 999 Diamond Ridge Rezoning from C-O to C-1 W+E S City ®f Jeffers®n Planning & Zoning Commission VICINITY — H \`__. Ij LU OR ) EMERALD-L=N ---0 ZI -F-cGEWOOD ------------------ -----------------------------------I 466=HbLL RD ---------------- xf N 999 Diamond Ridge 0 400 800 1,600 Feet W E Rezoning from C-0 to C-1 + S APPLICATION FOR ZONING AMENDMENT City of Jefferson - Planning Division R E g_a m i Department of Planning & Protective Services 1. 320 East McCarty Street Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 dAN 1 g 2012 Phone (573)634-6410 Fax(573)634-6457 The undersigned hereby petitions the Planning and Zoning Commission and City ouncil of tfitll�irytyl'0Q��fferson, Missouri, for the following amendment to the Zoning Code: ROTECTIVE SE VICES ❑ Zoning Text Amendment (Describe below or attach complete narrative) Article and Section Affected (if applicable) Description of proposed text amendment: Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning of Real Estate) The undersigned hereby state they are the owners of the following described real estate: Property Address: �°ipi p 1-1� 1` pr�lJJ 1D4Y t f it i � �� Oti C t t 6,to 51 Legal/Property Description (write out or attach as an exhibit): L o+ f- 0'(� -b-e r,, 1 c s«/,/ 'v-s 'rn Who petition to rezone the above described real estate from its present classification of G O district to G I district. The purpose of this rezoning request is to: f, t�Ga P,C� b. c.-1+0 W-C vtv� h-T 0 'r3' F?> g I,'-vC LJ n D G-2, ALL OWNERS OF REAL PROPERTY PROPOSED TO BE REZONED MUST SIGN THE APPLICATION,AND ALL SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED. IF ADDITIONAL SIGNATURES ARE NEEDED, PLEASE ATT—AQB,.%FPARATE SHEETS. Prop erty Owner#1 Name (type orprint) rope wner 'gnature /A1i Property Owner#2 Name (type or print) Pr perry O ner Signature ti _ N6fAR1''i�bi�LT�W Lo'/1�n b �1 day of the r "�2 STATE OF MISSOURI ) COLE COUNTY My Commission Expires: 4-2D-2014 Notary Public COMMISSION M 104D02g31 Address of Property Owner#1: qq ! clJ2cc t� C*vt� (cfgP Address of Property Owner#2 Phone Number(s): &55 —600 Applicant Information (if different from property owner): Name: Address: Phone Number MM For City Use Only.- Application Filing Fee $200 Payment Received: _Cash (Receipt# ) Check (Copy; check# ) Attachments: Additional sheets or documentation Applicant/Project Information Sheet Location Map Page 1 or i May 6,2002 Narrative in Support of Rezoning Application 999 Diamond Ridge Jefl'erson City, MO Current Zoning: CO Proposed Zoning: C1 Reason for Rezoning Application: Owner is currently negotiating with a prospective tenant to lease certain space at the lower level of the building. Tenant is an upscale Salon and Day Spa which is not permitted in a CO zoning but would be in a C1 zoning. Changes to the Building: There will be no changes made to the form and outer envelop of the present building. Typical internal tenant build-out will include restrooms, salon work stations ctc. Parkin : Present on-site parking will meet CI zoning requirements. Landscaping There will be no changes made to the existing landscaping. Aa' .A. Architect 704 hrimiose Ct. Jenerso0 City NIO. 65109 (573)230 8324 E:gavinbargate("i)embargmail.com A� a City of Jefferson W "; - Eric J. Struemph, Mayor Department of Planning&Protective Services Janice McMillan, Director 320 E.McCarty SG _ — - Phone:573-634-6410 Jefferson City, MO 65101 – Fax: 573-634-6457 ivzs"' January 27, 2012 Dear Property Owner: This letter is to notify you that the Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission will meet at 5:15 p.m. on Thursday, February 9, 2012 in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street, to consider the following matter(see map on back): Case No. P12002 — 999 Diamond Ridge; Rezoning from C-O to C-1. Application filed by Max and Ann Fisher, property owners, to rezone 0.93 acres from C-O Office Commercial to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial. The property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Emerald Lane and Diamond Ridge and is described as Lot 86 of Diamonds Subdivision Section 4, Jefferson City, Missouri. (Gavin Bargate, Consultant) As a nearby landowner and/or neighbor, you have the privilege of attending this hearing. Unfortunately, we are unable to record comments received by telephone, however, written comments may be directed to the Planning and Zoning Commission in one of the following ways: e-mail: jcplanning @jeffcitymo.org fax: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services/Planning Division 573-634-6457 mail: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services/Planning Division John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Written comments received on or before 1:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be made a part of the official record and copied and distributed to Commission members at the meeting. Those unable to provide written comments in advance are invited to deliver their comments to the Commission Chairman only at the meeting. Correspondence received after 1:00 p.m. will be included in the official record, but there is no guarantee that copies will be made for distribution to all Commission members. For your information, this case is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing in front of the City Council on March 19, 2012. The City Council meets at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact us at 573.634.6475. Submitted application materials and meeting information is available for review at: www.leffcitymo.org/pps/planning/pzcommission.html Sincerely, Eric Barron, AICP Senior Planner Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 Property Owners List Case No. P12002 999 Diamond Ridge February 9, 2012 Bono, John Randal & Mary Ellen Tungesvik, Nathalie LLC 995 Diamond Rdg 994 Diamond Rdg, Suite 200 Jefferson City, Mo 65109 Jefferson City, MO 65109 995 Diamond Rdg 994 Diamond Rdg Double Vision Enterprises LLC Tungesvik, Nathalie LLC PO Box 104891 994 Diamond Rdg, Suite 200 Jefferson City, MO 65110 Jefferson City, MO 65109 1001 Diamond Rdg 994 Diamond Rdg Double Vision Enterprises LLC Williams, Thomas David & Vicky Sue c/o Jim Jordan 991 Diamond Rdg PO Box 104891 Jefferson City, MO 65109 Jefferson City, MO 65110 991 Diamond Rdg 1004 Diamond Rdg Edgewood Development LLC 806 Sherwood Dr Jefferson City, MO 65109 3124 Emerald Ln Fisher, Max & Ann Properties LLC 999 Diamond Rdg Jefferson City, MO 65109 999 Diamond Rdg (Subject Property) Franke, Dean D 987 Diamond Rdg Jefferson City, MO 65109 987 Diamond Rdg Phelps, Louis C 986 Diamond Rdg Jefferson City, MO 65109 986 Diamond Rdg Scheppers, Joseph N & Brenda K 817 Weatherhill Rd Jefferson City, MO 65109 Sardonyx Dr Spears, Alan Cox, Cheryl 990 Diamond Rdg Jefferson City, MO 65109 990 Diamond Rdg Standlee - Tungesvik LLC 994 Diamond Rdg, Ste 200 Jefferson City, MO 651D9 994 Diamond Rdg PLANNING STAFF REPORT JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING CONEVIISSION February 9,2012 Case No. P12002— 999 Diamoud Ridge; Rezoning from C-O to C-1. Application filed by Max and Ann Fisher, property owners, to rezone 0.93 acres frmn C-O Officc Commercial to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial. The property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Emerald Lane and Diamond Ridge and is described as Lot 86 of Diamonds Subdivision Section 4, Jefferson City, Missouri. (Gavin Bargate, Consultant) Nature of Request This request is for an existing 2 story off-ice building that has a vacant lower level. The property owner wishes to lease the lower level of the building to a Salon and Day Spa tenant. Salon/Day Spas are defined by the Zoning Code as a"personal services" use and are not permitted in the C-O zoning district. The property owner is proposing a rezoning or the property to C-1 in order to permit the proposed use. Zoning and Surrounding Land Use Current Zoning: C-O Current Use: Office with vacant lower level Requested Zoning: C-1 Intended Use: Office/Salon and Day Spa SurroundingZoning Surrounding Uses North RS-2 Single Family Residential South C-2 Offices Last C-O Undeveloped West C-O Offices Allowed Uses: The C-1 Neighborhood Commercial zoning district allows for a variety of land uses including day care centers, hotel/motel (less than 50,000 sq. ft.), offices, banks, restaurants, drive through restaurants, general retail, personal services, and laundromats. (please see exhibit 35-28 of the zoning code for a complete list of authorized uses) Staff Analysis Standard checklist for rezoning: Yes No Notes: Complies with Comprehensive Plan X The Comprehensive Plan identifies this property as commercial and supports the requested rezoning. Has access to necessary utilities X The existing building is already connected to all necessary utilities. Located outside flood zone X The property does not lie within the 100 year flood lain. Meets district size requirement X. A variety of commercial zoning exists in the area. The rezoning can be considered an extension of the mixed commercial zoning in the area. Benefit to City is substantial when compared to X The rezoning would allow for more commercial adverse affects on adjacent properly flexibility in an established commercial area. The rezoning would not be a grant of privilege to X The public would benefit from the additional the owner with little or no benefit to the public commercial flexibility. After rezoning, the allowed uses would be X The majority of the north side of Emerald Lane is compatible with uses allowed in adjacent districts zoned C-1. After rezoning, the allowed uses would be X The rezoning would be a continuation of the compatible with adjacent existing land uses commercial development pattern in the m-ea. If not rezoned, the owner would be deprived of use X Adjacent properties and nearby properties in the advantages enjoyed by surrounding owners (reverse area enjoy a higher commercial use of their spot zoning) I I property. The requested rezoning would be an expansion of X The rezoning would be a continuation of the an existing district commercial zoning in the area. Planning and Zoning Commission February 9, 2012 Case No. P12002 Page 2 Staff Recommendation and Analysis Approve lleny Neutral X Rezoning Request The Comprehensive Plan Development Plan map currently identifies this property as being intended for commercial use and the proposed rezoning would be a continuation of the C-I zoning pattern on the north side of Emerald Lane. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. Form of Motion: Approval of the request to rezone the property from C-O to C-1. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED Case No. P12002 999 Diamond Ridge February 9, 2012 Sender Senders Address How Received Date Received John & Maa Bono 995 Diamond Ride Hand delivered 2/6/2012 Double Vision Enterprises 1 1001 Diamond Ride Hand delivered 2/6/2012 Double Vision Enterprises 1004 Diamond Ride Hand delivered 2/6/2012 Louis Phelps 986 Diamond Ride Hand delivered 2/6/2012 Thomas & Vicky Williams 991 Diamond Ride Hand delivered 2/6/2012 Alan Spears 990 Diamond Ride Hand delivered 2/6/2012 Joseph & Brenda Scheppers 817 Weatherhill Road Hand delivered 2/6/2012 Nathalie Tun esvik, LLC 994 Diamond Ride Hand delivered 2/6/2012 Ed ewood Development, LLC 994 Diamond Ride Hand delivered 2/6/2012 John Randel &Mary Ellen Bono 995 Diamond Ridge, Jefferson City, MO 65109 January 30, 2012, City of Jefferson - Planning Division, Dept. of Planning &Protective Services, 320 East McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Dear City of Jefferson, Re: 999 Diamond Ridge: Proposed Rezoning from CO to Cl As owner of a neighboring property I confirm that the Max and Ann Fisher, property owner of 999 Diamond Ridge, and the applicants for the rezoning, have discussed the above proposal with me and that I understand what they want to do. I hereby confirm that I have no abjection to this rezoning application. Yours truly, Nash Date Name Date RECEIVED FEB - 6 2012 PLANNING & PROTECTIVE SERVICES Double Vision Enterprises LLC 1001 Diamond Ridge Jefferson City, MO 65109 January 30, 2012, City of Jefferson - Planning Division, Dept. of Planning & Protective Services, 320 East McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Dear City of Jefferson, Re: 999 Diamond Ridge: Proposed Rezoning from CO to CI As owner of a neighboring property I confirm that the Max and Ann Fisher, property owner of 999 Diamond Ridge, and the applicants for the rezoning, have discussed the above proposal with me and that I understand what they want to do. I hereby confirm that I have no objection to this rezoning application. Yours truly, y v '7-Z e Date Name Date M Double Visions Enterprises LLC 1004 Diamond Ridge Jefferson City, MO 65109 January 30, 2012, City of Jefferson - Planning Division, Dept. of Planning &Protective Services, 320 East McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Dear City of Jefferson, Re: 999 Diamond Ridge: Proposed Rezoning from CO to C1 As owner of a neighboring property I confirm that the Max and Ann Fisher, property owner of 999 Diamond Ridge, and the applicants for the rezoning, have discussed the above proposal with me and that I understand what they want to do. I hereby confirm that I have no objection to this rezoning application. Yours truly, -z /Z Nat Date Name Date RECEIVED FEB - 6 2012 PLANNING& PROTECTIVE SERVICES Louis Phelps 986 Diamond Ridge, Jefferson City, MO 65109 January 30, 2012, City of Jefferson - Planning Division, Dept. of Planning &Protective Services, 320 East McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Dear City of Jefferson, Re: 999 Diamond Ridge: Proposed Rezoning from CO to C2 As owner of a neighboring property I confirm that the Max and Ann Fisher, property owner of 999 Diamond Ridge, and the applicants for the rezoning, have discussed the above proposal with me and that I understand what they want to do. I hereby confirm that I have no objection to this rezoning application, Yours truly, /J /n// 1 Name Date Name Date M Thomas David & Vicky Sue Williams 991 Diamond Ridge, Jefferson City, MO 65109 January 30, 2012, City of Jefferson - Planning Division, Dept. of Planning & Protective Services, 320 East McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Dear City of Jefferson, Re: 999 Diamond Ridge: Proposed Rezoning from CO to C1 As owner of a neighboring property I confirm that the Max and Ann Fisher, property owner of 999 Diamond Ridge, and the applicants for the rezoning, have discussed the above proposal with me and that I understand what they want to do. 1 hereby confirm that I have no objection to this rezoning application. Yours truly, 19 q j ,D t Cc,mQp G R i G I Nam / //, Date 1 Name Date = E EIVED FED - 6 2012 PROTECT VE SERVICES Alan Spears 990 Diamond Ridge, Jefferson City, MO 65109 January 30, 2012, City of Jefferson - Planning Division, Dept. of Planning &Protective Services, 320 East McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Dear City of Jefferson, Re: 999 Diamond Ridge: Proposed Rezoning from CO to C1 As owner of a neighboring property I confirm that the Max and Ann Fisher, property owner of 999 Diamond Ridge, and the applicants for the rezoning, have discussed the above proposal with me and that I understand what they want to do. I hereby confirm that I have no objection to this rezoning application. Yours truly, Nan �,�' Date ( �z ©l z Name Date RECEIVED FEB - 6 2012 PLANNING & PROTECTIVE SERVICES Joseph & Brenda K. Sclieppers 817 Weatherhill Road Jefferson City, MO 65109 January 30, 2012, City of Jefferson- Planning Division, Dept. of Planning & Protective Services, 320 East McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Dear City of Jefferson, Re: 999 Diamond Ridge: Proposed Rezoning from CO to C1 As owner of a neighboring property I confirm that the Max and Ann Fisher, property owner of 999 Diamond Ridge, and the applicants for the rezoning, have discussed the above proposal with me and that I understand what they want to do. I hereby confirm that I have no objection to this rezoning application. Yours truly, me Date =,I, Name Date RECEIVED FED ° 6 2012 PROTECT MEI SERVICES Nathalic Tungesvik y L-LC 994 Diamond Ridge, Jefferson City, MO 65109 January 30, 2012, City of Jefferson - Planning Division, Dept. of Planning & Protective Services, 320 East McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Dear City of Jefferson, Re: 999 Diamond Ridge: Proposed Rezoning from CO to C1 As owner of a neighboring property I confirm that the Max and Ann Fisher, property owner of 999 Diamond Ridge, and the applicants for the rezoning, have discussed the above proposal with me and that I understand what they want to do. I hereby confirm that I have no objection to this rezoning application. Yours truly, Nam , _ �t Date Name ' Date RECEIVE ��® ® � 2012 PROTECT VEI SERVICES Edgewood Development, LLC 994 Diamond Ridge, Jefferson City, MO 65109 January 30, 2012,. City of Jefferson - Planning Division, Dept. of Planning &Protective Services, 320 East McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Dear City of Jefferson, Re: 999 Diamond Ridge: Proposed Rezoning from CO to Cl As owner of a neighboring property I confirm that the Max and Ann Fisher, property owner of 999 Diamond Ridge, and the applicants for the rezoning, have discussed the above proposal with me and that I understand what they want to do. I hereby confirm that I have no objection to this rezoning application. Yours truly Name Date Name Date RECEIVED FED - 6 2012 PLANNING & PROTECTIVE SERVICES March 15, 2012 RECEIVED Department of Planning & Protective Services MAR 1 9 2012 Planning Division John G. Christy Municipal Building 320 E. McCarty St, E PROTECT PLANNING SERVICES Jefferson City, MO 65101 To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of Reflections Hair Salon, located at 3218 West Edgewood Drive, we would like to share with you our concerns in regards to case number P12002,rezoning from C-0 to C-1 at 999 Diamond Ridge. We feel rezoning this area to house a new salon would have a negative impact not only on us, but on other salons and stylists in the area. Currently there are two salons located in this area,Reflections Hair Salon and Artistic Vision Hair Design. Reflections Bair Salon currently has seven stylists operating within its salon. If this rezoning is passed to house another salon, it could very possibly take away business from salons and stylists currently in the area. Taking away business from these salons would force them to suffer financially resulting in the businesses to either shut down or relocate within or outside of the city limits. The salon business in Jefferson City is highly competitive. If current salons are forced to close down or relocate because of competition moving into the area, current customers of those salons will be forced to seek business elsewhere which is a burden on the customer. These customers also have the option to seek business outside of Jefferson City which will take away money from the city as well. Please take into consideration our concerns not only for our business, but also for our loyal customers. By allowing the rezoning of 999 Diamond Ridge from C-0 to C-1, will have a negative impact on our business and other similar businesses in the area. Sincerely, Kimberly Toebben, Owner Svetlana Paschal, Stylist Candi Hagler, Stylist April Sommers, Stylist Becca Jean Denny, Stylist � y Jremnfer Pritchett, Stylist �;L„✓r�r } j � Cl�`� �G.•�"✓ March 18,2012 Jefferson City City Council Department of planning and zoning To the Jefferson City zoning commission, We are a group of concerned citizens that are Hair Stylists, Salon Owners or other salon employees. We are asking that you NOT rezone Lot 86 of Diamonds Subdivision section four.to accommodate another salon. Part of us at another time tried to also put a salon in that building and were not allowed to because of how it is zoned. So we moved to other property extremely close to said property. And now we find out that it may be zoned to house another salon. This area has several other salons within a close proximity Including Retlections,Artistic Vision,Marshall & Co.,A tanning Salon and Shear Technique We don't think it is fair that this salon in planning may be given permission and rezoning that we were denied We are asking respectfully that you NOT rezone said property to house another salon. Respectfully, U UC� CG� t Q, March 18,2012 Jefferson City City Council Department of planning and zoning To the Jefferson City zoning commission, We are a group of concerned citizens that are Hair Stylists, Salon Owners or other salon employees. We are asking that you NOT rezone Lot 86 of Diamonds Subdivision section four.to accommodate another salon. Part of us at another time tried to also put a salon in that building and were not allowed to because of how it is zoned. So we moved to other property extremely close to said property. And now we find out that it may be zoned to house another salon. This area has several other salons within a close proximity Including Reflections,Artistic Vision,Marshall &Co.,A tanning Salon and Shear Technique We don't think it is fair that this salon in planning may be given permission and rezoning that we were denied We are asking respectfully that you NOT rezone said property to house another salon. Respectfully, March 18,2012 Jefferson City City Council Department of planning and zoning To the Jefferson City zoning commission, We are a group of concerned citizens that are Hair Stylists, Salon Owners or other salon employees. We are asking that you NOT rezone Lot 86 of Diamonds Subdivision section four.to accommodate another salon. Part of us at another time tried to also put a salon in that building and were not allowed to because of how it is zoned. So we moved to other property extremely close to said property. And now we find out that it may be zoned to house another salon. This area has several other salons within a close proximity Including Reflections,Artistic Vision,Marshall & Co.,A tanning Salon and Shear Technique We don't think it is fair that this salon in planning may be given permission and rezoning that we were denied We are asking respectfully that you NOT rezone said property to house another salon. Respectfully, 0 March 18,2012 Jefferson City City Council Department of planning and zoning To the Jefferson City zoning commission, We are a group of concerned citizens that are Hair Stylists, Salon Owners or other salon employees. We are asking that you NOT rezone Lot 86 of Diamonds Subdivision section four. to accommodate another salon. Part of us at another time tried to also put a salon in that building and were not allowed to because of how it is zoned. So we moved to other property extremely close to said property. And now we find out that it may be zoned to house another salon. This area has several other salons within a close proximity Including Reflections,Artistic Vision,Marshall & Co.,A.tanning Salon and Shear Technique We don't think it is fair that this salon in planning may be given permission and rezoning that we were denied We are asking respectfully that you NOT rezone said property to house another salon. Respectfully, f March 18.2012 Jefferson City City Council Department of planning and zoning To the Jefferson City zoning commission, We are a group of concerned citizens that are Hair Stylists, Salon Owners or other salon employees. We are asking that you NOT rezone Lot 86 of Diamonds Subdivision section four.to accommodate another salon. Part of us at another time tried to also put a salon in that building and were not allowed to because of how it is zoned. So we moved to other property extremely close to said property. And now we find out that it may be zoned to house another salon. This area has several other salons within a close proximity Including Reflections,Artistic Vision,Marshall &Co.,A tanning Salon and Shear Technique We don't think it is fair that this salon in planning may be given permission and rezoning that we were denied We are asking respectfully that you NOT rezone said property to house another salon. Respectfully, M � March 18,2012 Jefferson City City Council Department of planning and zoning To the Jefferson City zoning commission, We are a group of concerned citizens that are Hair Stylists, Salon Owners or other salon employees. We are asking that you NOT rezone Lot 86 of Diamonds Subdivision section four.to accommodate another salon. Part of us at another time tried to also put a salon in that building and were not allowed to because of how it is zoned. So we moved to other property extremely close to said property. And now we find out that it may be zoned to house another salon. This area has several other salons within a close proximity Including Reflections,Artistic Vision,Marshall & Co.,A tanning Salon and Shear Technique We don't think it is fair that this salon in planning may be given permission and rezoning that we were denied We are asking respectfully that you NOT rezone said property to house another salon. Respectfully, March 18,2012 Jefferson City City Council Department of planning and zoning To the Jefferson City zoning commission, We are a group of concerned citizens that are Hair Stylists, Salon Owners or other salon employees. We are asking that you NOT rezone Lot 86 of Diamonds Subdivision section four. to accommodate another salon. Part of us at another time tried to also put a salon in that building and were not allowed to because of how it is zoned. So we moved to other property extremely close to said property. And now we find out that it may be zoned to house another salon. This area has several other salons within a close proximity Including Reflections,Artistic Vision,Marshall &Co.,A tanning Salon and Shear Technique We don't think it is fair that this salon in planning may be given pennission and rezoning that we were denied We are asking respectfully that you NOT rezone said property to house another salon. Respectfully, q March 18,2012 Jefferson City City Council Department of planning and zoning To the Jefferson City zoning commission, We are a group of concerned citizens that are Hair Stylists,Salon Owners or other salon employees. We are asking that you NOT rezone Lot 86 of Diamonds Subdivision section four. to accommodate another salon. Part of us at another time tried to also put a salon in that building and were not allowed to because of how it is zoned. So we moved to other property extremely close to said property. And now we find out that it may be zoned to house another salon. This area has several other salons within a close proximity Including Reflections,Artistic Vision,Marshall &Co.,A tanning Salon and Shear Technique We don't think it is fair that this salon in planning may be given permission and rezoning that we were denied We are asking respectfully that you NOT rezone said property to house another salon. Respectfully, "/ March 18,2012 Jefferson City City Council Department of planning and zoning To the Jefferson City zoning commission, We are a group of concerned citizens that are Hair Stylists, Salon Owners or other salon employees. We are asking that you NOT rezone Lot 86 of Diamonds Subdivision section four.to accommodate another salon. Part of us at another time tried to also put a salon in that building and were not allowed to because of how it is zoned. So we moved to other property extremely close to said property. And now we find out that it may be zoned to house another salon. This area has several other salons within a close proximity Including Reflections,Artistic Vision,Marshall & Co.,A tanning Salon and Shear Technique We don't think it is fair that this salon in planning may be given permission and rezoning that we were denied We are asking respectfully that you NOT rezone said property to house another salon. Respectfully, March 18,2012 Jefferson City City Council Department of planning and zoning To the Jefferson City zoning commission, We are a group of concerned citizens that are Hair Stylists, Salon Owners or other salon employees. We are asking that you NOT rezone Lot 86 of Diamonds Subdivision section four. to accommodate another salon. Part of us at another time tried to also put a salon in that building and were not allowed to because of how it is zoned. So we moved to other property extremely close to said property. And now we find out that it may be zoned to house another salon. This area has several other salons within a close proximity Including Reflections,Artistic Vision,Marshall &Co.,A tanning Salon and Shear Technique We don't think it is fair that this salon in planning may be given permission and rezoning that we were denied We are asking respectfully that you NOT rezone said property to house another salon. Respectfully,