HomeMy Public PortalAbout06-11-2013MEDINA
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, JUNE 11, 2013
7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL (2052 County Road 24)
1. Call to Order
2. Public Comments on items not on the agenda
3. Update from City Council proceedings
4. Planning Department Report
5. Approval of May 14, 2013 draft Planning Commission minutes.
6. Mono a Hol i„gs, T L C pm 01 1 8 73_22-0006 (ens of
County Road 116, south of Hackamore Road) Preliminary Plat for
13 lot subdivision on 10 acres (5.72 buildable acres) and Rezoning
to the R1 Single Family zoning district. PUBLIC HEARING TO
BE HELD ON FUTURE DATE
7. Complete Eye Care of Medina — 170 Westfalen Trail (PID 12-118-
23-41-0117) — Site Plan Review for construction of new
commercial building
8. Ned Sorley — 4200 Hillview Lane (PID 06-118-23-41-0002) —
Comprehensive Plan Amendment to extend the Metropolitan Urban
Service Area to include property to permit existing lot to connect to
municipal sanitary sewer system
9. Council Meeting Schedule
10. Adjourn
POSTED IN CITY HALL JUNE 7, 2013
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Weir and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson
DATE: May 30, 2013
SUBJ: Planning Department Updates June 4, 2013 City Council Meeting
Ordinance Updates
A) Lot Frontage, Flag Lots, Driveway Regulations — staff began work on an ordinance related
to these subjects, which originally was a 2012 goal, but was deferred as other ordinances
were determined to be of higher priority. The Planning Commission reviewed at the April
and May meetings and recommended approval of the ordinance. Staff intends to present to
the Council at the June 4 meeting.
Land Use Application Reviews
A) Morrison Lot Split and Variance — Truxtun and Adrienne Morrison have requested to
subdivide their 18 acres at 1525 Hunter Drive into two lots. The applicant also requested a
variance from the required road width standards of the subdivision ordinance, but has since
withdrawn this request. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the April 9 and May
14 meetings and recommended approval. The Council reviewed at the May 21 meeting and
directed staff to prepare a resolution of approval. The resolution will be presented at the June 4
meeting.
B) Fenske/Cole Variance Request — 2959 Lakeshore Avenue — Sandra Fenske and Randy Cole
have requested a variance from the setback from Lake Independence to construct a house
addition in the location of an existing deck on their home. A lake setback variance was granted
in 1999 for the deck, but staff determined that the two-story (+ walkout) addition in the same
location and an additional deck proposed by the applicant was an intensification and could only
be constructed if a new variance is granted. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at
the May 21 meeting, and recommended approval, but only if the applicant reduces hardcover on
the property below existing conditions. Staff intends to present the request at the June 4
meeting.
C) Complete Eye Care Site Plan Review —170 Westfalen Trail — Dr. Wesley has requested a site
plan review for the construction of a new building to house Medina Eye Care next to West
Financial at Sioux Drive and Highway 55. Staff is reviewing the information, which will be
scheduled for a hearing at the Planning Commission, potentially at the June 11 meeting.
D) Sorley Comp Plan Amendment — 4200 Hillview — The property owner has requested a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment to add their 6 acre property to the Metropolitan Urban Service
Area (MUSA) so that they can connect to the City of Loretto's sewer system instead of
replacing a septic system on their property. Staff is reviewing the information, which will be
scheduled for a hearing at the Planning Commission, potentially at the June 11 meeting.
E) Fawn Meadows subdivision — east of CR 116, north of Medina Lake Drive — Money Tree, LLC
has requested a preliminary plat and rezoning for the development of the 10 acres (5.72 net
acres) immediately north of the Toll Brothers Reserve of Medina project. Staff is conducting a
preliminary review and the item will be scheduled for a Public Hearing when complete.
F) Kunin/Anderson Lot Rearrangement Easement Vacation — 855 Medina Road — the property
owners have requested to rearrange lot lines to add two acres of property to 855 Medina Road.
Planning Department Update
Page 1 of 2 June 4, 2013
City Council Meeting
The applicant also requests the vacation of drainage and utility easements adjacent to the lot line
proposed to be adjusted. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and the item will be presented
when complete.
G) Three Rivers Park/Reimer Lot Rearrangement — the property owners have requested a lot
rearrangement to allow a "land swap" of property which the Reimers own on the west side of
Homestead Trail and which Three Rivers owns on the east side of Homestead Trail. The
applicants do not wish to submit the deposit required by the City, and have not completely filled
out the application forms. The item will be presented when complete for review.
H) Johnson Lot Combination, Comp Plan Amendment and Rezoning — 2505 Willow Drive — The
City Council approved of Dan and Jill Johnson's requested lot combination, CPA to change the
future land use of three parcels of land from Rural Residential to Agriculture and rezoning of the
property from Rural Residential to Agricultural Preserve at the May 21 meeting. Staff will work
with the applicant to finalize conditions of approval.
I) The Reserve of Medina Preliminary Plat — The City Council granted preliminary plat approval
to Toll Brothers on May 21 for a 126 -lot single-family subdivision on the Gorman Farm
property east of County Road 116 and south of Hackamore. The City will await an application
for final plat.
J) The Enclave at Brockton 3rd Addition — Lennar has requested approval to plat the "detached
townhome" portion of the Enclave at Brockton. The Council approved a resolution at the May 7
meeting. Staff will assist the developer in finalizing the terms and conditions of approval before
construction begins
K) The Enclave at Medina 3rd Addition and 4th Addition — the City Council approved the final plat
requests at the March 19 meeting. Staff is coordinating the conditions of approval before
signing the plats and authorizing work to begin on the improvements.
L) Fields of Medina West —1st Addn — north of Highway 55, east of Arrowhead — Mattamy Homes
applied to final plat 34 of the 64 lots within the subdivision. The Council granted final plat
approval at the April 16 meeting, and staff is working with the developer to finalize the
conditions of approval before construction begins.
Additional Projects
A) Cable Expansion Priority — staff provided updated information for a meeting with
Mediacom to discuss timing on expanding cable access in the community.
B) Planning Commission Interviews — staff took part in interviews with Council Member
Martin and Vice Chair Reid with applicants for open seat on the Planning Commission.
The group will provide a recommendation to the City Council for appointment at the June 4
meeting.
Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 June 4, 2013
City Council Meeting
1 CITY OF MEDINA
2 PLANNING COMMISSION
3 DRAFT Meeting Minutes
4 Tuesday, May 14, 2013
5
6 1. Call to Order: Commissioner Charles Nolan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
7
8 Present: Planning Commissioners Robin Reid, Randy Foote, Charles Nolan and
9 Mark Osmanski
10
11 Absent: V. Reid and Kent Williams
12
13 Also Present: City Councilmember Kathleen Martin, City Planner Dusty Finke, Nate
14 Sparks of NAC and Planning Assistant Debra Peterson.
15
16 2. Public Comments on items not on the agenda
17 No public comments.
18
19 3. Update from City Council proceedings
20 Martin updated the Commission on recent activities and decisions by the City
21 Council.
22
23 4. Planning Department Report
24 Finke provided an update of upcoming Planning projects.
25
26 5. Approval of the April 9, 2013 Draft Planning Commission meeting minutes.
27 Motion by Foote, seconded by R. Reid, to approve the April 9, 2013 with one minor
28 change. Motion carried unanimously. (Absent: V. Reid and Kent Williams)
29
30 6. Public Hearing — Randy Cole & Sandra Fenske - 2959 Lakeshore Avenue -
31 Request for a Variance to the Setback Requirements from the Ordinary High
32 Water Line (OHWL) of Lake Independence for an addition and deck onto their
33 home (PID 18-118-23-23-0022).
34 Sparks presented request for a Variance to the OHWL setback requirements. He
35 explained the lot is approximately 7500 square feet in size. The applicant is
36 proposing a full addition with a narrow deck and stairs. The stairs extend out into the
37 yard currently and would be proposed to be less intrusive and would be parallel to the
38 deck and not towards the lake. In 1999 variances were granted to build a home on the
39 property to replace a cabin. The house was then built 25 feet from the road rather
40 than the 30 foot requirement, even though they weren't approved for the 25 foot
41 setback. Staff is not sure how this happened, though the front of the house appears to
42 be in line with the other homes along the lake. He said some consideration at the time
43 of construction may have been allowed, but staff is unsure. The lot currently exceeds
44 the allowable hard cover. Sparks further summarized the neighboring properties and
45 Variances granted along the lakeshore.
1
46
47 Sparks reviewed the Variance Criteria with the Commission and explained if the
48 Variance was granted as requested, it wouldn't change the character of the area. He
49 said lately the City has been looking closer at the impact of the local waters. He said
50 in this case, if the Commission were to consider approving the Variance staff would
51 recommend the applicant improve the stormwater runoff. Improvements would be to
52 replace existing hardcover in areas where plastic is used around landscaping and
53 replace it with permeable products. Sparks said the Watershed would also like to see
54 reduced hardcover on the lot which would assist in less runoff to the lake.
55
56 Sparks said by granting a Variance for this property it wouldn't be creating
57 precedence for others. He further suggested stormwater management be reevaluated.
58
59 R. Reid asked why the applicant needed a variance when they are reducing the
60 setback distance from original variance approved. Sparks explained that the original
61 Variance was approved for the deck and not for a full addition. Finke said the request
62 increases what was originally approved by increased massing of the addition going up
63 three stories and an additional deck.
64
65 Osmanski asked where the stormwater was located. Finke and Sparks explained its
66 location and that the catch basin would be to catch their own drainage. Nolan asked
67 what ideas would be helpful on a residential scale. Sparks said staff would have the
68 City Engineer look at it to determine what would be best. He said perhaps a small
69 raingarden to slow the water from getting to the lake. He said it would need to be
70 large enough to serve the purpose. Foote asked if any of theother land owners had
71 anything similar and Sparks said he couldn't tell from the applicant's location.
72
73 Nolan asked if the construction of the home not meeting the setback was by the
74 current owner. Sparks said no, it was a different land owner.
75
76 Public Hearing opened at 7:00 p.m.
77
78 Applicant Sandra Fenske of 2959 Lakeshore Avenue explained that the City had
79 made improvements to some of the runoff issues in the area and sees huge
80 improvements from Balsam. She said she'd be willing to take the plastic out from the
81 landscaping areas. Nolan asked the size of the house and she said it was a four
82 bedroom. Nolan asked what prompted the dimensions for the addition and Fenske
83 said it was determined by the current size of the deck. Dave Raskob, the applicant's
84 builder, explained that he's a neighbor and builder and wanted to work with the
85 existing conditions and make the same size with no additional impact to the lake.
86 Nolan asked what was currently on the ground elevation under the deck. Raskob said
87 it currently has a concrete slab which is cracked and would be taken out and replaced
88 to improve it.
89
2
1
1
90 Foote asked if the applicant gets water from the neighboring properties. Fenske said
91 they used to get water from the lot to the north but they made improvements with a
92 swale and don't have issues any longer.
93
94 Public Hearing closed at 7:37 p.m.
95
96 Osmanski, Foote, and R. Reid said they would approve the variance if the applicant
97 reduced the impervious surface. Nolan said he didn't see exchanging the plastic for
98 the fabric as an equal exchange. He asked for the applicant to look at some of the
99 hard surface areas and to reduce it further. He suggested trading a built surface for
100 landscaping or forgoing the grilling deck or the deck out by the lake. Nolan
101 commented that the applicant is adding to the footprint. Osmanski suggested a
102 specific percentage of reduction be recommended as an option. Nolan said at a
103 minimum he would want to see the drainage system improved. He said it's common
104 for properties to be able to mow right up to the lake, but then there isn't anything to
105 stop the chemicals from going into the lake. Foote said they were all good points and
106 if they lowered the size of the addition that would be acceptable. Nolan said they
107 wouldn't have to lessen the addition size, but rather eliminate the grilling deck,
108 sundeck, fire pit or something.
109
110 R. Reid asked if Nolan's issue was the additional 86 square feet being added for the
111 deck. Nolan said it was the increased hard cover on a lot that currently doesn't meet
112 the minimum and are asking for something additional.
113
114 Motion by Foote, seconded by R. Reid to recommend approval of the Variance
115 to the setback requirements from the OHWL on Lake Independence for an
116 addition and deck onto their home, conditioned that the private drainage is
117 improved as recommended by staff and the impervious surface be reduced
118 including but not limited to the areas within the landscaped areas. Ayes by
119 Foote, Osmanski, and R. Reid. Nay by Nolan. Motion carried. (Absent: V. Reid
120 and Kent Williams).
121
122 7. Public Hearing - Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 8 of the Medina City Code
123 relating to required street widths.
124 Finke presented the street width regulation changes. Nolan asked what the previous
125 changes were. Finke said the previous ordinance didn't have minimum standards in
126 City Code. He explained that in December a new ordinance was adopted relating to
127 road improvements which required a minimum roadway width. As recommended
128 currently, any subdivision with three lots or more would require a road meeting
129 minimum roadway width requirements. The proposed changes in the draft ordinance
130 modify the number of lots that trigger the road improvement. One lot into two lots
131 would not be required to meet the minimum width requirements. Foote asked as an
132 example, if a property owner came in and wanted to divide their one lot into two lots
133 and it was approved and didn't need to make improvements, but then a neighbor on
134 the same road comes in to divide their one lot into two, would the second party on the
135 roadway have to improve the road? Finke responded by saying the ordinance
3
136 presumes some sort of improvement, but the two owners on the same road could seek
137 the same flexibility without having to widen the road, but they would not be able to
138 then apply again and further subdivide any portion of the original lot.
139
140 Nolan asked staff if they were aware of any other municipalities that allow less than
141 20 feet in width roadways. Finke said not to his knowledge with new streets. He said
142 currently a person on an existing road wouldn't be allowed to subdivide without
143 improving the entire road to 20 feet in width.
144
145 Nolan asked if a cap should be put on the flexibility of people subdividing on a
146 narrower road. Finke said the ordinance is written to provide the City a lot of
147 flexibility. R. Reid asked at what point is a driveway turned into a road. Finke said
148 over two lots would trigger it.
149
150 Neil Wolf, Hamel Fire Department, said 20 feet is for a reason, because they are
151 driving big trucks. Running a 24 foot truck which is 8 %2 feet wide in 10 below zero
152 temperatures with trees along the road is difficult. He said some driveways are as
153 long as a quarter of a mile in length and he feels the width standards are there for a
154 reason and that it works. He said some of the houses being built are the size of a
155 commercial building (5-10,000 square feet) and their trucks can't get down an 18 foot
156 roadway. The standard fire access road requirements need to remain.
157
158 R. Reid asked how we separate the difference of a driveway and a road. Wolf said a
159 lot of existing private roads are as difficult to maneuver through as are driveways.
160
161 Nolan asked if there was any liability to the City if the roadway width was reduced.
162 Finke said the new ordinance would allow staff to have the ability to discuss requests
163 related to road widths. Wolf said he doesn't want to deviate from the 20 foot
164 requirements. Finke said the new urban subdivisions will be 28 feet and it's the rural
165 property areas that would have the flexibility. Finke said that Wolf made a good
166 point concerning rural areas possibly needing more road width than urban areas since
167 urban areas have fire hydrants. Wolf said it's a difficult task at best to make sure no
168 one gets hurt, but with the long winters it's dangerous with the ice and weight of the
169 trucks. Inherently the tanker trucks are the most dangerous to drive. If a fire is at a
170 home and it has a long driveway it should have appropriate accessibility with a 20
171 foot wide driveway for safety reasons. He said the Fire Department has 8-12 minutes
172 to mitigate a fire.
173
174 R. Reid asked how wide a tanker was and Wolfe said Hamel's is 8'8". Finke
175 explained that with snow plowing the guys run into the same problem, though the
176 City has the option to use different vehicles based on the location they are plowing.
177 Wolfe added that it's happened once already where the fire trucks couldn't access the
178 house due to site circumstances and accessibility.
179
180 Public Hearing opened at 8:20 p.m.
181
4
182 Bob Mitchell of 1745 willow Drive said in his building he had to have a water
183 bladder in each building until the City built a water tower. He said if properties aren't
184 accessible to the Fire Department, insurance companies aren't going to insure the
185 building(s).
186
187 Public Hearing closed at 8:22 p.m.
188
189 Foote said he's generally been in favor of wider roads. He said he would like to keep
190 it at 20 feet in width which would then not open up the City to legal issues. Osmanski
191 said he is in favor of safe streets, but to allow flexibility to create adjustments to
192 existing narrower streets for small subdivisions would be nice if it wouldn't put the
193 fire fighters at risk.
194
195 R. Reid asked if the City had reduced the roadway widths on any subdivisions. Finke
196 said only one he could think of was 20 feet in width. He said the question is if
197 someone comes in would the 18 foot road be sufficient with improvements or would a
198 24 or 28 foot roadway width be required. Foote said his concern is multiple
199 subdivisions serviced by an 18 foot wide roadway. Nolan asked if they were talking
200 about the road or the driveway. Finke said the road to get to the driveway.
201
202 Nolan asked Wolf if the ordinance would allow flexibility and if safety is a factor in
203 design. Wolf said he maintains the opinion that a 20'width road should be required
204 since trucks will only be getting larger. The ability to allow people to not meet the 20'
205 roadway width would only increase the number of requests the City would see. Wolf
206 said he still maintains the opinion of requiring 20' roadway width. Foote asked Wolf
207 how he felt if pullover areas would be created and Wolf responded by saying it would
208 still be a danger to his fire fighters when they pull over on a class five roadway.
209
210 Motion by Osmanski, seconded by Foote, to deny the Ordinance Amendment to
211 allow flexibility to reduce street widths less than 20 feet. Motion carries
212 unanimously (Absent: V. Reid and Kent Williams).
213
214 8. Continued Public Hearing — Thomas T. Morrison — Lot Subdivision of one
215 existing Lot into Two Lots at 1525 Hunter Drive (ND 25-118-23-22-0005) and a
216 Variance from minimum Road Width requirements.
217 Sparks presented the application. He explained to the Commission that the applicant
218 withdrew his request for a Variance to the road width requirements today, but would
219 still like to subdivide his property.
220
221 Foote asked how long the road was and Sparks said about a quarter mile. Nolan said
222 he wasn't at the meeting last month and went to the property and didn't think that it
223 would be that difficult to expand. R. Reid commented that there would be quite an
224 expense to widen and make the road improvements. She further asked what the
225 narrowest and widest points of the road were. Sparks explained it ranged between 18
226 feet and 20 feet. Finke said they've gone out since winter and the road is on average
227 18 '/2 feet wide. Nolan asked what design specifications the City would require for a
5
228 private road. The Commission discussed and Finke said it would have to meet City
229 regulations.
230
231 Truck Morrison, the applicant, said he withdrew his request for a Variance. He said
232 since the previous meeting he had met with the Ferris's lawyer and had worked
233 through concerns they had about the driveway running parallel along their property.
234 Morrison said they agreed to install eight spaded trees to place anywhere the Ferris's
235 so choose. Foote asked if the applicant was willing to build the road to the 20 foot
236 width standard and Morrison said if they had to they would, but are hoping to not
237 have to widen the area closest to Hunter Road.
238
239 Ferris of 1535 Hunter Drive said he thought six more homes could be allowed along
240 their roadway and is inevitable. So by definition, the area will become a development
241 over time. He thinks the road width issue will continue over time.
242
243 Morrison said three of the nine homes have driveways '/ mile long and narrow. Nolan
244 said if the driveway isn't safe for a fire truck to drive down, then property owners are
245 losing some of the fire protection.
246
247 Public Hearing closed at 8:52 p.m.
248
249 R. Reid asked for clarification concerning there not being a need for a Variance since
250 they were just subdividing one lot into two. Finke said yes and that a condition
251 should be placed on the application to require the road to meet City standards.
252
253 Finke suggested the applicant and Ferris have a formal agreement with staff
254 reviewing it as it relates to the easement for the driveway. The Commission agreed to
255 include it as a condition.
256
257 Nolan said he is pleased that two property owners could get together and resolve their
258 differences since he hadn't seen it happen very often.
259
260 Morrison asked if they could have more than 180 days to file with the County and the
261 Commission said they would be willing to allow.
262
263 Motion by R. Reid, seconded by Foote, to approve a Lot Subdivision of one
264 existing Lot into Two Lots conditioned on modifying condition number four to
265 require a 20 foot roadway being constructed and to allow for the applicant to
266 have more than 180 days to file the necessary paperwork with Hennepin County
267 to effectuate the lot split. Motion carries unanimously (Absent: V. Reid and
268 Kent Williams).
269
270 9. Continued Public Hearing — Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 8 of the Medina
271 City Code related to flag lots, lot frontage, driveway regulations, minimum street
272 grades, and the use of public easements and rights -of -way.
273 Finke presented the ordinance Amendment.
6
i
274
275 Nolan asked at what point does a driveway become a road. Finke said with four
276 homes. Finke said the minimum width standard deals with the reduction of side
277 loaded garages. It also requires new driveways in nonrural districts to be paved
278 which are common in suburban areas. The frontage of a flag lot should have a
279 minimum of 1% street gradient. Finke said rural lots would be required to have 60
280 feet of street frontage. Martin asked why 60 feet and Finke said it was chosen to be
281 consistent with the rural right-of-way width requirements. Finke explained that the
282 width would be wide enough to create a road if necessary in the future.
283
284 Martin asked for clarification of suitable soils within private roads or access
285 easements. Finke explained that suitable soils under private streets within outlots do
286 not count for adjacent property. He noted that the proposed ordinance amendment
287 would treat the area within an access easement the same as if it were in an outlot, and
288 it wouldn't be counted towards the suitable soils for either property. He noted tha the
289 reason for this is that locating a septic system within the access easement would be
290 inconsistent with its use for access. However, if the subdivider proposed a flag lot,
291 suitable soils within the flagpole would be counted towards the lot in which they are
292 located.
293
294 Finke explained utility easements are a big concern. Drainage is typically
295 accommodated in rear drainage utility easements and property owners tend to do what
296 they think are minor improvements that cause drainage issues. Nolan asked if we
297 would review these requests.
298
299 Continued Public hearing closed at 9:19 p.m.
300
301 Motion by Foote, seconded by R. Reid to Approve the Ordinance Amendment
302 related to flag lots, lot frontage, driveway regulations, minimum street grades,
303 and the use of the public easements and rights -of -ways as drafted and conditions
304 within right-of-way. Motion carries unanimously (Absent: V. Reid and Kent
305 Williams).
306
307 10. Council Meeting Schedule
308 Nolan to attend and present at the May 21st, 2013 Council meeting.
309
310 11. Adjourn
311 Motion by Osmanski, seconded by R. Reid, to adjourn at 9:22 p.m. Motion carried
312 unanimously. (Absent: V. Reid and Kent Williams)
7
AGENDA ITEM: 7
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner
DATE: June 6, 2013
MEETING: June 11, 2013 Planning Commission
SUBJ: Complete Eye Care — Site Plan Review —170 Westfalen Trail (southwest of
Hwy 55 and Sioux Drive)
Review Deadline
Complete Application Received: May 14, 2013
120 -day Review Deadline: September 11, 2013
Overview of Request
Dr. Gina Wesley, owner of Complete Eye Care of Medina, proposes to construct a building with
a floor area of approximately 4442 square feet within the Hamel Station commercial
development at 170 Westfalen Trail (immediately west of West Financial). Complete Eye Care
currently leases space and operates in Medina. The subject property is 18,310 square feet in size,
located west Sioux Drive along Westfalen Trail. Elm Creek is located immediately north of the
site, with Highway 55 further to the north.
Section 825.55-.59 of the City's zoning ordinance requires approval of a Site Plan Review by the
City before a building permit may be issued for a new commercial building. The purpose of
such review is to ensure compliance with relevant City regulations and to determine what
conditions are necessary in order to promote public health, safety or welfare, to achieve
compliance with [city] ordinances, or to accomplish the purposes of the district in which the
property is located.
Approved Site Plan
In 2007, the City Council adopted Resolution 2007-56, approving the Hamel Station commercial
development. This resolution is attached for reference. The property was rough graded during
the development of the Hamel Station project. Half of the access drive to the site is located on
the property and the remaining is vacant.
This resolution included approval for development of three lots: a 5,476 square foot credit union
(West Financial) to the east; a 9,216 square foot retail building to the west, and a drive-thru
coffee shop of 1,750 square feet on the subject property.
The resolution also approved a series of variances. One variance allowed additional hardcover
upon the development site than is permitted in the Shoreland Overlay District of Elm Creek.
Another variance approved of retaining walls and parking (already constructed) within the 50
foot setback from Elm Creek. Additionally, variances were approved for the subject property
allow a drive-thru closer to Sioux Drive than permitted in the Uptown Hamel zoning district.
The drive-thru variances are no longer relevant since none is proposed (and the property has
subsequently been rezoned and the setback for drive-thru is no longer required).
Complete Eye Care
Page 1 of 6 June 11, 2013
Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
The proposed building is larger than was approved during the 2007 review. As a result, an
amended Site Plan Review was necessary. Staff has reviewed the conditions applied to the 2007
site plan review approval. Most of the conditions were satisfied during the initial development
of the site. The two outstanding matters are for specific utility and grading plans to be approved
with each building permit and the applicant will need to obtain approval from the Elm Creek
Watershed Commission for this amended plan.
Subsequent to the 2007 approval, the property was rezoned to the Commercial Highway -
Railroad (CH -RR) zoning district and various other City regulations have changed. As a result,
the City reviewed relevant to current standards. However, staff assumed that the 2007 variance
would still apply, and that the site would be permitted the same amount of hardcover approved
for the subject property during the 2007 review (13,230 square feet).
Analysis
The proposed use is an eye clinic. Professional and medical clinics are a permitted use within
the CH -RR zoning district.
As noted above, the applicant proposes a building with a floor area of 4,442 square feet.
Resolution 2007-56 approved a 1,750 square foot coffee shop on the subject property. The
coffee shop approved in 2007 included a large concrete patio and a drive-thru lane. The
applicant proposes to increase the size of the building, but not increase hardcover. Staff does not
oppose the increase in floor area, provided matters such as setbacks, hardcover, and parking are
not negatively impacted.
The applicant proposes to construct parking to the north of the proposed structure. This parking
lot is part of a broader shared parking lot which was intended to serve the entire Hamel Station
development.
Setbacks / Hardcover
The following table summarizes the lot requirements of the CH -RR district in comparison to the
proposed site plan.
CH -RR District
Requirement
Variance
Allowed
Proposed
Front Yard Setback
25 feet
620 feet
Frontage Road
0 feet
10 feet (Westfalen)
Arterial Roadway
50 feet
111 feet (Hwy 55 ROW)
Rear Yard Setback
25 feet
N/A
Side Yard Setback
15 feet
15 feet
Parking Setbacks
Front/Street
25 feet
70 feet (Westfalen)
Rear/Side
10 feet, 0 if shared
Shared with properties to
the east, west, and north
Residential
40 feet
N/A
Elm Creek Setback
50 feet
Impervious Surfaces
25% (shoreland)
72.3%
76.3%
Building Height
45 feet
27.5 feet
Complete Eye Care
Site Plan Review
Page 2 of 6
June 11, 2013
Planning Commission Meeting
The plans submitted by the applicant meet the dimensional standards of the CH -RR district with
the exception of maximum impervious surface coverage. Although a variance was granted in
2007 for additional hardcover, the plans originally submitted by the applicant proposed an
additional 744 square feet of hardcover. The applicant has reviewed the plans and determined
that hardcover can be reduced by 764 square feet as described in their attached narrative. Staff
recommends this reduction as a condition of approval.
Wetlands/Floodplains
As noted above, Elm Creek flows just to the north of the subject property. The wetland adjacent
to Elm Creek requires a buffer of 30 feet, and the Elm Creek Watershed required a 50 foot
vegetative buffer adjacent to Elm Creek during the review of the Hamel Station development.
No wetland impacts are proposed, and the proposed improvements meet the City's upland buffer
requirements and do not alter what was previously approved by Elm Creek. Staff recommends
that signage be added along the buffer consistent with City regulations.
A floodplain also exists adjacent to Elm Creek to an elevation of 967.14. No impacts are
proposed. The seller of the property had agreed to conduct restoration along Elm Creek during
the initial development of the site. Instead, the seller removed a large amount of significant trees
along the creek in violation of City ordinances and the restoration plans for Elm Creek. The City
and the seller came to an agreement related to mitigation for these impacts, which included
replacement plantings and a contribution to the environmental fund. The seller has begun
maintaining the replacement trees and vegetation consistent with plans and the City's ecologist
believes it is on track to be established this fall. The City holds a financial guarantee to ensure.
Building Materials and Design
The table below summarizes the building requirements of the CH -RR district in comparison to
the proposed building plans. The proposed plans appear to abide by the district standards.
One of the requirements of the CH -RR district is that any building facade which faces a street or
residential zoning district should be "4 -sided" architecture and be consistent with the quality
expected on the front of a building. The south side of the building, facing Westfalen Trail,
includes windows and is fairly well modulated.
Staff does not believe that any of the elevations feel like the "back of a building" and that the
structure does have a 4 -sided look.
CH -RR District Requirement
Proposed
Exterior Building Materials
Brick, stone, glass, stucco
Min 30%
82%
Decorative Concrete
Max 70%
0%
Metal, wood, fiber cement
Max 20%
18%
Modulation/Articulation
South Elevation
1 per 40 feet
1 per 30 feet
North Elevation
1 per 40 feet
1 per 15 feet
East Elevation
1 per 40 feet
1 per 17 feet
West Elevation
1 per 40 feet
1 per 24 feet
Fenestration (window coverage)
"Generous"
Generous
Complete Eye Care
Site Plan Review
Page 3 of 6
June 11, 2013
Planning Commission Meeting
Stormwater and LID Review
The applicant proposes to utilize the existing stormwater improvements which were constructed
during the initial site development in 2007 to control the rate of stormwater runoff. The
proposed site plan does not incorporate low impact design (LID) principles.
The City updated its stormwater management regulations after the stormwater improvements
were approved and constructed and the improvements would not meet the updated standards.
The stormwater management ordinance does allow for the City to waive full compliance with the
updated standards if a stormwater management plan has been approved prior to the standards
coming into place.
Because half of the site was graveled and there was no stormwater treatment before the Hamel
Station development, the City Engineer estimates that the improvements approved in 2007
reduced nutrient loading by 20%. The pond also controls the rate of runoff consistent with
today's standards.
Access/Driveway/Parking
The applicant proposes to utilize the existing shared driveway which was constructed in the
initial development of the West Financial building. When the property to the west develops, the
access drive will continue through and connect with Westfalen Trail to the west. The original
plan was for the Hamel Station project to be owned by a single entity, which is no longer the
case. As such, staff recommends that reciprocal easements and maintenance agreement be
recorded against all three properties to allow for access and shared parking.
The applicant proposes to construct 20 parking spaces, 9 of which are at least partially located on
adjoining property. Shared parking was planned for the Hamel Station commercial project.
Although the floor area of the building is proposed to be increased, the change of use from coffee
shop to medical office actually reduces the required parking from 18 spaces to 17 spaces. Ten
parking spaces were approved on the subject property during the 2007 review, and 11 spaces are
now proposed. Staff does not believe that the parking is negatively impacted as a result of the
change of use and amended site plan.
Landscaping/Tree Preservation
There are no significant trees located on the property, so no tree removal is proposed.
A landscaping plan was approved during the development of the Hamel Station site. The
approved site plan from 2007 planned for 3 overstory trees, 7 ornamental trees and 70 shrubs.
The applicant proposes to plant 3 overstory deciduous trees, 7 ornamental trees, and 32 shrubs.
As noted previously, the property has also been subsequently rezoned since the 2007 approval.
The requirements of the CH -RR district would require 10 overstory/coniferous, 5 ornamental
trees and 17 shrubs. The Planning Commission and Council may wish to discuss whether
additional landscaping should be required as a result of the increased building size or the new
requirements of the CH -RR zoning district.
Two landscaping islands totaling 180 square feet were shown on the approved site plan in 2007.
The applicant proposes to construct a single landscaping island on 90 square feet. In addition,
Complete Eye Care
Page 4 of 6 June 11, 2013
Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
the applicant proposes 180 square feet of landscaping adjacent to the handicap parking stall. The
CH -RR zoning district would require significantly more landscaping within the parking lot (8%
of the area, or 580 square feet). Staff would recommend against a reduction in landscaping
within the central portion of the parking lot area, and recommends that this be amended. It may
be preferable for the survival of plants to increase the width of the single island rather than
adding another small island.
The applicant proposes to sod the area adjacent to the building. The area north of the parking lot
will be native vegetation for the Elm Creek buffer.
Lighting
The applicant proposes lighting on the existing building. This lighting will be required to be
downcast and shielded, consistent with City standards. Staff recommends a condition that
photometrics be submitted to verify consistency with the 0.5 footcandle maximum at property
lines.
Trash and Recycling Facilities/Mechanical Equipment
The applicant proposes to store trash and recycling containers within the building. No areas have
been identified for storage on the plans, so staff recommends a condition to update plans to show
how this will be handled.
The CH -RR ordinance requires that mechanical equipment be screened with walls which are
constructed of materials which are compatible with the building or opaque landscaping. Staff
recommends a condition consistent with this requirement.
Utilities
The City Engineer and Public Works have reviewed the proposed utility plan and made technical
recommendations. Staff recommends compliance with these recommendations as a condition of
approval.
Loading Dock/Outside Storage of Service Vehicles
No loading docks are proposed. The proposed use has limited loading needs. Staff recommends
a condition that loading and deliveries occur from the parking lot is such a way that does not
interfere with circulation.
The CH -RR ordinance limits outside storage of service vehicles (under 24 feet in length) to one
vehicle per 10,000 square feet of building footprint. While the proposed use does not include the
need for such parking, staff recommends a condition informing the applicant that a maximum of
one service vehicle may be stored within the parking lot.
Review Criteria/Staff Recommendation
The purpose of a Site Plan Review, as described in Section 825.55, is to review proposed
construction for consistency with City regulations. The City "may condition its approval in any
manner it deems reasonably necessary in order to promote public health, safety or welfare, to
achieve compliance with this ordinance, or to accomplish the purposes of the district in which
the property is located."
Complete Eye Care Page 5 of 6 June 11, 2013
Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
Staff believes that the proposed amendment to the approved site plan is consistent with City
regulations and policies, subject to the terms and conditions noted below. Staff, therefore,
recommends approval with the following conditions:
1) Except as modified herein, construction shall be consistent with the plans received by the
City on May 13, 2013.
2) The applicant shall enter into a development agreement related to the terms and conditions
contained herein and other relevant City requirements and policies.
3) The applicant shall update plans to reduce impervious surface coverage to 13,230 square
feet or less.
4) The applicant shall update plans to provide a minimum of 180 square feet of landscaping
within the center of the parking lot area.
5) The applicant shall provide specifications on proposed lighting, which shall be downcast
consistent with City requirements. The applicant shall also submit photometric plans of
lighting which ensure no more than 0.5 footcandles of light trespass at rights -of -way.
6) The applicant shall update plans to identify storage areas for trash and recycling. Such
storage shall be within the building, unless an alternative is provided which meets City
requirements.
7) Mechanical and HVAC equipment shall be screened with building materials consistent with
the building or adequate vegetation.
8) Except as modified herein, the applicant shall abide by the recommendations of the City
Engineer dated 5/29/2013 and City Planner dated 6/4/2013.
9) The applicant shall record easements and maintenance agreements, in a form and of
substance approved by the City, which provide for shared access and parking.
10) The applicant shall install upland buffer signage consistent with the City's wetland
protection ordinance.
11) Loading and deliveries shall occur from the off-street parking area and shall not interfere
with circulation.
12) A maximum of one vehicle utilized for the use permitted on the property may be stored
within the off-street parking area. Such vehicle shall be currently licensed, operable, less
than 24 feet in length, and not more than 12,000 lbs. of gross vehicle weight. No outdoor
storage shall be permitted.
13) The applicant shall obtain necessary permits from the City, Elm Creek Watershed,
Minnesota Department of Health, and any other relevant agency prior to commencing
construction activity on the property.
14) Construction hours shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and
8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday.
15) The applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the
cost of reviewing the site plan and other relevant documents.
Attachments
1. Applicant Narrative
2. Resolution 2007-56
3. City Engineer comments dated 5/29/2013
4. City Planner comments dated 6/4/2013
5. Plans received by the City 5/13/2013
Complete Eye Care Page 6 of 6 June 11, 2013
Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
BJ BAAS
Builders, Inc.
June 6, 2013
Mr. Dusty Finke, City Planner
City of Medina
2052 County Rd 24
Medina, MN 55340
RE: Complete Eye Care/Wesley Holdings, LLC construction at 170 Westfalen Trail, Medina, MN
Dear Mr. Finke:
This letter is in response to your recent letter dated June 4, 2013, and follow up phone conversations
regarding the impervious surface area on the referenced lot.
This letter serves as notification that we have redesigned the site plan to reduce overall impervious
surface by a total of 764 square feet. We accomplished this by making the following adjustments:
• Narrowing of sidewalks o 4/except at front of building)
• Move sidewalk from East side of building to West, and split property line
• Narrow Drive lanes to 22' wide
• Eliminate concrete in island adjacent to handicap parking stall
As per our conversation, we will re -submit a new site plan drawings that represents the noted changes
prior to the upcoming City Council meeting in July. Should you have any questions regarding these
changes, feel free to contact me.
Respectfully,
B ian J. Baas
C.C.
Dr. Gina Wesley
Lea Kangas, Inside Outside Architecture
Brent Roshell, PE, Anderson -Passe Engineering
330 N. Emerson Street
Cambridge, MN 55008
www.bjbaas.com
P: 763.691.0444
F: 763.691.0555
Member Johnson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-56
RESOLUTION GRANTING AMENDED SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE
APPROVAL FOR THE UPTOWN HAMEL RETAIL DEVELOPMENT
LOCATED AT 3575 SIOUX DRIVE REPRESENTED BY UNITED PROPERTIES
WHEREAS, United Properties (the "Applicant") has requested approval for an
amended site plan and with variances from the City Council ("the City") to operate a
multi -use retail development with drive-in uses located at 3575 Sioux Drive (the "Subject
Property"), which is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City Council originally approved the site plan with variances for
the Subject Property on May 1, 2007; and found that exceptional and extraordinary
circumstances do apply to this property due to the topography and proximity to Elm
Creek; and
FURTHER, that the Applicant has meet the intentions of the Uptown Hamel
zoning district; and
FURTHER, that the variances would not be materially detrimental to the
purposes of the ordinance under which the property is zoned, and the Applicant has
provided the minimum necessary improvements to alleviate the hardship, and that the
Applicant is furthermore reducing the impervious surfaces and improving the site with
the approved Site Plan; and
FURTHER, that the applicant has demonstrated undue hardship because of
circumstances which make the subject property unique as compared to other properties
within the district; and
WHEREAS, the City Council on September 18, 2007 reviewed the amended site
plan with variances for its conformance with the City's ordinances and the terms and
conditions of the original site plan approval, considered the recommendations of staff and
heard comments from the Applicant; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the changes to the previously approved
site plan with variances qualify as minor changes and that the amended site plan
conforms with the conditions of preliminary approvals and the standards for the district in
which the property is located; and
Resolution No. 2007-56
October 16, 2007
WHEREAS, this resolution replaces the previously approved site plan and
variance resolution (Res No. 2007-22) for the Subject Property; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA that it should and herby does approve the
request by United Properties for an amended site plan with the following variances for
the Subject Property:
1. A variance to exceed the 25% maximum impervious surface shoreland
requirement. The proposed development will increase the total impervious
surface to 50% of the site.
2. A variance to allow the retaining wall to encroach 10 feet within the 50 -foot
setback on the vegetative buffer on Elm Creek.
3. A variance to allow the driveway to the drive-in service businesses (the coffee
shop and the credit union building) to encroach 80 feet within the 100 -foot
setback from an improved intersecting street.
4. A variance to allow the driveway to the drive-in service business associated
with the coffee shop to encroach 120 feet within the 300 -foot setback from
State Highway 55.
5. A variance to allow the driveway to the drive-in service business associated
with the credit union to encroach 20 feet within the 300 -foot setback from
State Highway 55.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the amended site plan and variance
approval are subject to the terms and conditions are subject to the following terms and
conditions:
1. The amended site plan with variances is approved, in accordance with the
architectural plans received August 6, 2007 and the civil plans received
August 29, 2007, except as amended by this resolution.
2. The amended site plan and variance approval shall be contingent on approval
of a final plat for the Subject Property and all the conditions of final plat
approval.
Resolution No. 2007-56 2
October 16, 2007
3. The Applicant shall meet all of the Elm Creek Watershed Management
Commission (ECWMC) conditions of approval addressed in the letters from
ECWMC dated August 29, 2007 and September 5, 2007 that are still
outstanding for the stream bank restoration and landscape buffer plan, the
erosion and sediment control plan and the stormwater management plan prior
to any work being conducted on the site.
4. The Applicant shall submit a complete set of updated civil plans prior to any
work being conducted on the site that accurately shows that the proposed
property boundaries are consistent with the final plat received August 29,
2007.
5. All conditions stated in the City Engineer's report dated September 11, 2007
shall be addressed by the Applicant.
6. The application for building permits must include grading, drainage and
erosion control plans with each building plan submitted.
7. All signs shall be in compliance with the City's sign ordinance and if signage
is lit, it shall meet the outdoor lighting standards as defined in the ordinance.
8. The Applicant shall dedicate a sign easement for a future freestanding
community identification sign along the west side of Sioux Drive at a location
to be determined by City staff. The freestanding project sign for the Hamel
Station development shall be not be located within 50 -feet of the sign
easement.
9. If the coffee shop is to have a menu board, the Applicant must submit the
proposed sign prototype for review by the City prior to issuance of a building
permit.
10. The proposed parking area shall meet all City design standards and ADA
accessibility requirements. The plans should be revised prior to issuance of
building permits to provide an acceptable handicap parking space and stripped
access aisle for the coffee shop building. If an individual must cross the
vehicle lane than a white painted crosswalk should be added.
11. The drive-in services must not be used between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6
a.m.
12. The Applicant acknowledges the potential adverse impacts of the Highway 55
corridor planning efforts as presented in the City Council Special Meeting
held on April 17, 2007, which may result in encroachments beyond the
dedications made by the Applicant on the plat.
Resolution No. 2007-56 3
October 16, 2007
13. The Applicant must enter into a development agreement and a petition and
waiver agreement in forms satisfactory to the City to ensure completion of
subdivision improvements and development of the project in compliance with
all City requirements.
14. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in the amount sufficient to reimburse
the City for the cost of reviewing the site plan and related documents.
Dated: October 16, 2007
T.M. Crosby, Jr., Mayor
Attest:
Chad M. Adams, City Administrator - Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Weir
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Crosby, Smith, Weir, Johnson
and the following voted against same: (Absent: Cavanaugh)
None
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2007-56 4
October 16, 2007
EXHIBIT A
Lot 33, Auditor's Subdivision No. 241, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that part
described as follows: commencing at the Southwest corner of said lot; thence on an
assumed bearing of North 1 degree 29 minutes 40 seconds East, along the West line of said
lot, a distance of 192.20 feet to the Northwest corner of said lot; thence North 61 degrees 35
minutes 39 seconds East, along the Northwesterly line of said lot, a distance of 55.78 feet;
thence South 59 degrees 12 minutes 01 seconds East a distance of 101.50 feet; thence South
75 degrees 49 minutes 17 seconds East a distance of 91.63 feet to the point of beginning of
the land to be described; thence continuing South 75 degrees 49 minutes 17 seconds East a
distance of 125.00 feet: thence North 14 degrees 10 minutes 43 seconds East a distance of
60 feet; thence North 00 degrees 38 minutes 05 seconds East a distance of 10.05 feet to the
South line of State Trunk Highway No. 55; thence North 79 degrees 29 minutes 35 seconds
West, along said South line, a distance of 152.54 feet; thence South 75 degrees 49 minutes
17 seconds East a distance of 29.58 feet to its intersection with a line bearing North 14
degrees 10 minutes 43 seconds East from the point of beginning; thence South 14 degrees
10 minutes 43 seconds West, a distance of 60 feet to the point of beginning.
Resolution No. 2007-56 5
October 16, 2007
WSB
rs
May 29, 2013
engineering • planning • environmental • construction
Mr. Dusty Finke
Planner
City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340-9790
Re: City Project: Complete Eye Care Site Plan Review, LR-13-108
WSB Project No. 2065-500
Dear Dusty:
701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
We have reviewed the site plan dated May 8, 2013, for the proposed Complete Eye Care site. The
plans propose to construct an eye care facility along with parking areas, storm sewer, utility
connections, and landscaping. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters.
Sheet Cl Grading and Drainage Plan
1. The plans show the property boundaries and proposed construction going beyond the
property lines. The applicant should provide evidence they have permission to construct
improvements on neighboring properties.
2. The plans should include proposed 1 -foot contours.
3. Storm sewer calculations should be provided.
4. The proposed sanitary sewer and water connections are shown being cut into the existing
systems. The applicant should utilize existing sanitary sewer and water stubs to this site if
they exist. The as -built utility information for this site should be included in this plan set.
5. More sanitary sewer service detail should be provided including proposed invert elevations
and cleanout locations.
6. The plans should include more detail in the northeast corner of the site where the existing
bituminous berm is to be removed. The berm was installed to prevent an erosion problem at
the north end of the drive aisle at the MCES access to their facilities. The plans should show
how the proposed storm sewer on the subject site will accommodate the drainage previously
diverted to the storm sewer on the neighboring property to the east.
7. The proposed storm sewer system shall collect all drainage from the proposed site
improvements. It appears storm sewer needs to be added to collect drainage from the
westerly part of the site.
St. Cloud • Minneapolis • St. Paul
Equal Opportunity Employer
wsbeng.com
K.. 0?065-500,AdminDacs1Complere Eve Core Sire Plan Revie,w052913.doc
Complete Eye Care Site Plan Review
May 29, 2013
Page 2
8. It is unclear why CB 4 is necessary. The applicant should provide clarification why this
structure is necessary.
9. The City does not allow irrigation from the municipal water system. Future submittals
should identify how water will be supplied for irrigation.
Sheet C2 Civil Details
1. City standard details should be included in the plan set and replace the details shown.
2. The proposed parking lot section should match the section used on the property to the east.
Please contact me at 612-209-5113 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Tom Kellogg
srb
K:101065-5001AdminlDocs!Compkre Eve Care Site Plan Revie-O5?913.doc
i
MEDINA
CITY OFFICE
2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN 55340-9790
ADMINISTRATION I PLANNING Sc ZONING I PUBLIC WORKS
p: 763.473-4643 f: 763.473-9359
e: city@ci.medina.mn.us
PUBLIC SAFETY
p: 763.473.9209 f: 763.473-8858
June 4, 2013
Dr. Gina Wesley
6855 Old Settlers Road
Corcoran, MN 55340
Dear Dr. Wesley:
City of Medina staff has conducted a preliminary review of the materials submitted requesting Site Plan
Review approval for your new building at 170 Westfalen Trail. The plan is largely consistent with the
approved site plan for this site and City policies and regulations. Staff did note some items which will
need to be adjusted, which are described below.
Proposed hardcover exceeds that which was approved as part of the original Site Plan Review and
Variance in 2007 by 744 square feet. Staff will be recommending that hardcover be reduced to be
consistent with the 2007 approval. It appears that the removal of the sidewalk along the east and south
of the building (or the utilization of porous surfacing) would reduce hardcover by 450-500 square feet.
The southern drive aisle could also be narrowed which would reduce hardcover by approximately 75
square feet.
Additional detail Is required related to plans for trash/recycling storage.
Staff recommends that the applicant specify how the hardcover will be reduced (as a narrative, at the
least) and where trash and recycling will be stored before the project proceeds to the Planning
Commission.
Additional detail is also necessary for the grading/drainage/stormwater management plan. The utility
plan is required to be updated to show how a hydrant will be accommodated at the southwest corner of
this lot as shown on the approved site plan and how the future hydrant to the north of the building to
the west will be served. Staff recommends extending the existing 6" waterline in the parking lot to the
western property line. As an option, the hydrant could be placed on the western property line for the
possibility that it serve both buildings when the site to the west is ultimately developed. This
information does not need to be updated before the Planning Commission meeting, but should be
provided before approval by the City Council.
www.ci.madina.mn.us
The proposed landscaping plan appears mostly consistent with the approved landscaping plan for the
development. Staff will note during the review process that the building size has been increased and
that the approved landscaping plan does not meet the standards of the CH -RR zoning district. The
Planning Commission or City Council may require additional plantings as a result.
Additional comments from the City Engineer are attached. These are more technical comments which
will need to be addressed before permits can be issued.
This letter also serves as notice that the City will extend the review timeframe for this site plan review
by an additional 60 days as described in chapter 15.99 of Minnesota State Statutes. The review deadline
is September 11, 2013, although staff anticipates action will be taken far in advance of this date.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at dusty.finke@ci.metdina.mn.us or
763-473-8846.
Sincerely, —
Dusty Finke
City Planner
CC: Brian Baas, BJ Baas Construction (via email: brian@bibaas.com)
Dr. Gina Wesley (via email: gmweslev@yahoo.com)
Project File
CO DE ANALYSIS CHECIQIST IBC 2006
Propel Here :Ca n** Elm Cage _.. ..
Prepared by: :LEK
A. BASIC DATAltem
Code
Refere rar - Item •
Semen 303 1 Occu pancy groulys ): M eer th e: B
Tads 506.13
se men 908 2 Occu pancy sepa ra tio n re quired n
Data
4/1912013
Chap.
Tabs 602
Table 503
Bo ston 50. 1-511
Table 503
a. Wall 0
b. Open ing 0
3 Co r,tniction Type VB
4 Fee Re sistance Requ ire ments of Exte rior Walls :
a. North: 0
b. Ea st:
c. So uth:
d. West
Opening.
OpeNngs
Openin gs
Openings
Stan.
Sto ries:
0:
0
0
0
0
5 Bu ilding Heights
a. Allowable Height:
b. Increase he Sprin klers:
0. A ctua l H eight:
6 Budding A rea s:
A. O cctp erruy Type:
t Bash Allowable
40
20'
208'
0
2
2
9000
5062 _... ... 2 In crease Fronta ge [179-16,247-10,.. 2512630 <3.xlllu-2941
606.3 3 In crease fo r Sprinklers, NFPA 13: rt03. 24 9801
4 Total Allo wable Area: 29943
C. Actua l Area:
Total Area list floor: fo otprint
__.. . ..Total are a seco nd floor: fo otprint
B. FIR E RESISTIVE REQUIREM ENTS:
Reference Item
Tea 63' t Structu ral Frame:
2 Exterior Beenrp Walls:
3 Integer Be ating Walls:
4 Exterio r Non-Beenng Walls:
5 !Me na Non'Bmmtg Wa l!s:. ..
6 Fa rs - FloortCedings:
7 Ra ab • RonECN lags:
9 Exterio r Doors:
10 Exterio r Windows
12 Ro ot Cowlings:
a ng er6
Orprw 6
prreue Al
Stars :
ton 15 Con dors: candor occ. Lo ad < 30 m all of 40 occ - 20) 0 Hours
115 16 Oohs (tjI@ iasy 0 Hours
C. OUT REQUIREMEN TS:
EN TS:
Co de
Re feren ce : -Ite m _. ... .
1004 and 100.1 1 I O ccupant Lo ad
b. First Faor . N o, Exits: : 34
0. Upper Floor No Exits: 6
O. To tal: (for o ccupan cy gro up)
2 E xd Doors:
1095 a. M Room Width Regw red 36' Height 6'$
b Maximum Leaf Width Allowed- - a6
0, S win g Re wired''
5ecem 1019 rt. Number of arils 1 (gl 2nd lax : 1g 1st loon, 2 ex its pr ovide d
3 Exit Co rridors:
. ...
1017.2 a. M'wmum Required Yrgdln. _-- 44'
10173 b. Dead End Lando n Mowed? Maximum Length. -.56 0'
10171 c. Walt Fire Resistance Required: 0
7154 d D oors and Fr ame s Fire R esista nce Re quired: 0
ire 4 M aximum Caden ce Alkwsd to Exit: 300'
ton. 21 5 End Separali Required M inimum: 281• Presided: 66-7
. _.. .:
1015 6 N umbe r of Stairwa ys Required
1020 - 7 . Era En closure Requirements: Not enclosed 1020.1 except 1.1 1410 oce. )
10073 8 Sta r Dimen sion s Requited: ...... . _
a. Width M in imu m: 46 acce ssible ?minded. 60'
b. Riser Maximu m: 7" Plaided: 613/16
Cpen: no Closed: Ye s
c. . Trend M inimum. 11' Prided: 11'
d Head Oemance Min imum: 86 Pleaded: 6d'
o Distance Betwee n Landdnga M aximum: 12' Pro vided' 10.3'
terse C
__. _i __ . .... d_. _
LarxSng Gmensinn Minimum: - Pea 5'
roots - g. Are a of Re fuge Minimum Size 30' X 48'
10091 h Handrail Requ iremen ts:. . __.. .
T Requ ired et Each S de Yes
2 Inte rme diate Ra ils Re quired at Stairs no
3 M aximum Width Be tween Interior Reis:tip
4 Ex ceplans Applicable _. . no
5 Height Able N osing:
6 Minimum Spacin g Allow ed:
7 Handrails Return to Wa ll at Eats"
B Exlamions a1 Ends Re qu ired: Bo th Sides
.. . .. _. Top 17 , Bo tto m 23'
... averaver1111 Acces sibility 2ndKweno t re qu ired to be a cces sible
1101 a. Ro ute of Tavel: 1st lax route of trawl is a cdessiMe
b. :Stain R equire d: not rea med
11098 0. O emlas Re quired:.. . .. ..
.. . _. .
tW7. 6 -. d Area or ReMgr.
D. FIR E ALARM A ND SU PPRESSIO N SYSTEMS :
Code
Re fe ren ce Ite m
1 Fre Ex tinguisher System s:
5031 a. Sprinkle rs Re quire d: re quired pe r MSBC 13. 06 as adapted by Gaya/ M aine
LETA lot a. Ere Extinguishers Require d: 3 travide d
T•7 - 2 Drat Stops Re quired al: .._ nine'1 3000 SF
M ECHAMCAU ELECTRICAL REOLIIREM ENTS:
Code Ite m
Re ferenc e 1 Talet R oan Require ments:
a. Velure Co unt Req uirements
Owger Nei 1 Men Re quirement Actual
(a ) Lasa taies . .. _s ets......
Veeyeeh (b)Wa [a easels
6011 code (c) U tina ls
en dda ebra&ml (d) Han dica pped
Purr.. Cade
3500
942
0- Haute
O Hours
O Hou rs ...
O Hou rs
0- . Hours....
O Hours
O Ho ts
0 Hours
O Hours
O Hz
O Hou r,
34' -38'
4' clear
Ye s
2 Warren
(a ) Lavatorie s
(b) Water Closets
(c) Handicappe d
F. . Drinkin g Fountain ftequitemen ls:
. Showers Re qu ire d:
d. serwae Sinks:
e. Floo rs: _.. . _
I. Walls:.
D MISC. REQ UIR EMENTS:
Code Item
Refinnse 1 Rooing R egW re ments:
t504 15W7 alas : - c
Ma teria l asphalt shingles 8 standing seam metal
Dratstops Re quired: no ne c 3000 SF attic spaces
Ven t8a6o n Requ irements:
Drainage '.
0 pe r MSBC 2007 2902.1 enc . F
ceramic rite
ce ramic tale W va t walla
asphalt slope 6'12: standing seam slo pe 3/12
001 -WE 4 Finis hes:
7,3, 60 34 a Fame -Spread Classiiea ton R equired:
Rooms Or Are as:.. . _. _.. .. . c.
LOCATION MAP
ABBREVATIONS
N .I.C.
U .N.O.
FEC
SIM
M AX
MIN
E LEV
TYP
W/
W/O
A DA
COMPLETE EYE CARE
N OT IN CON TRA CT
UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE
FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET
SIM ILAR
MA XIMUM
MINIMUM
ELEV ATION
TYPICAL
WITH
WITH OUT
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITY ACT
(ACCESSIBIL TY)
PROFESSIONAL BUILDING
170 WESTFALEN TR
MEDINA, MN 55340
CONTACTS
ARCHITECT
INSIDE OUTSIDE
ARCHITECTURE, INC.
(IO A INC.)
CO NTACT:
LEA KANGAS
Phone: 763-428-5870
GENERA L CONTRA CTOR
BJ BAAS BUILDERS, INC
330 N. Emerso n St.
Cambridge, MN 55008
C ONTA CT:
BRIAN BAAS
Phone: 763-691-0444
OWNER
COM PLETE EYE CARE
DR. G INA WESLEY
FIXTURE / ACCESSORY MOUNTING LOCATIONS
LAV ATORY
M IRROR
PAPER TO WEL DISPENSER
SAN ITARY NAPK IN VENDIN G
HA ND DRYER
TOILET PA PER HOLDER
SANITAR Y NAPKIN DISPOSAL
GRAB BARS
URINAL
WATER CLOSET
TOILET PARTITION
URINA L SCREEN
FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS
ROOM SIGNA GE
2'-10' TO TOP OF BASIN (ADA MAX. )
2-5' CLEAR BE LOW SINK (M IN.)
TYPICAL MIRROR BOTTOM SET ABOVE BA CKSPLASH OR
6' ABO VE WALL M OUNT SINK BOWL. 3'4' MAX. TO BOTTOM
R EFLECTIVE SURFACE OF M IRROR (ADA)
4'-U' MA X TO OPERA BLE PA RTS
4'-0' MAX TO OPERABLE PARTS
4'-0' MAX TO OPERABLE PARTS
MIN. 12' AN D MAX . 40' FRO M WALL BEHIND WATER CLO SET.
18' MIN . ABOV E FLOOR. 1 1/2' MIN. BELO W HOR IZONTAL
GRAB BAR
MIN. 17 AND MA X. 40' FROM WAL L BEHIND WATER CLO SET.
16 MIN . ABOV E FLOOR. 1 1/7 MIN, BELOW HOR IZONTAL
GRAB BAR
TOP OF HORIZONTAL BARS 33'-36' ABOVE FLOO R.
HORIZONTAL BAR BEHIND WATE R CLOSET TO BE 36 MIN . IN
LENGTH AND TO EXTEND t2' M IN FROM C ENTERLINE OF WATER CLOSET
TOWAR DS CLOSEST PER PENDICULAR WA LL AN D 24' M IN ALONG TRANSFER SIDE
HO RIZONTAL BA R ALONG SIDE OF WATER CLOSET TO BE 42'
MIN. IN LENG TH AND TO BEGIN M AX 12' FROM BACK WALL.
SIDE VERTICAL BA R TO BE 18' MINIMU M IN LEN GTH TO BE MOUNTED
WITH THE BOTTOM OF TH E BAR LOC ATED BETWEEN 39-41 IN CH ES ABOVE THE FLOOR
WITH THE CENTER LIN E OF TH E BA R LO CATED BETWEEN 3941 INCHES FRO M REAR WALL
1'-10' TO BOTTOM OF OPENING (NON ADA)
1'-5' TO BOTTOM OF OPENING (A DA HT. )
1'-3' TO TOP OF SEAT (NON A DA)
1'-6 TO 1' -T TO T OP OF SEAT (ADA HT.)
CENTERLINE OF ADA WATER CLOSET TO BE 1'51' FROM WALL
OR PARTITION WALL -
17 TO BOTTOM OF PARTITIO N
12" TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN. 54' TO T OP OF SCREEN
54' MAX. TO TOP OF CABINET
COM PLY WITH ACCESSIBILITY REQ UIREMENTS - SEE ALSO 101
N OTES:
1. REFER TO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR MOUNTING HEIG HTS OF FI XTU RES FURNISHE D BY THOSE
SECTIONS
2. SEE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL ACCESS ORY MOUNTI NG LOCATIO NS
SHEET INDEX
T1 TITLE SHEET, SHEET INDEX, A ND CODE SUM MARY
Cl GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C2 CIVIL DETA ILS
C3 LANDSCAPE PLAN
AS ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
Al FLOOR PLAN
A2 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN AND ROOF PLAN
A3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS & CO NSTRUCTIO N TYPES
A4 BUILDING SECTIONS AND WALL SECTIONS
A5 BUILDING SECTIONS, WALL SECTION S AND DETAILS
A6 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A7 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS, RECEPTION DESK PLAN AND DETAILS
A8 DOOR SCHEDULE, DOOR AND WINDOW TYPES
A9 FINISH PLAN
A10 REFERENCE FURNITURE PLAN, FINISH SCHEDULE AND SPECIFICATIO NS
S000 GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES
5001 FASTENING SCHEDULE
S100 FOUNDATION PLAN
S101 SECOND FLOOR FRAM ING PLAN
S102 RO OF FRAMING PLAN
S400 SHEAR WALL PLANS
S401 DETAILS
S500 DETA ILS
S501 DETAILS
GENERAL NOTES
MAY 1
ALL CONTRA CTORS MUST REVIEW ALL D OCUM ENTS TO QUANTIFY SCO PE OF WORK PRIOR TO SUB MITTING BIDS
2. CO NTRACTORS TO VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIM ENSIONS PRIOR TO STAR T OF WORK NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF
DISCREPANCIES
3. MECHA NICA L. ELECTR ICAL. AND PLUMBING DESIG N BY OTHERS. A NY WORK SHOWN ON AR CHITEC TURAL DRAWINGS
THAT IS WE/P IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE ALL KEYNOTES FOR ADDITIONAL MIE/P I NF ORMATION
4. ELEC TRICAL TO COORDIN ATE WITH O WNER AND ARCHITECT FOR OWNE R'S E QUIPMENT, POWE R, AND DATA NEEDS
5. LIGHTING SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE MECHANICAL AND
ELECTR ICAL PLA NS
6. ELECTRICA L TO ENSURE PROPER LIFE SAFETY LIGHTING. EMER GENCY LIGHTIN G, AND EXIT SIGNAGE IS PROVIDED
THROUGHOUT
SEE FINISH SPECIFICATIONS AN D ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE ON DRAWIN GS . C OO RDIN ATE WIT H AR CHITECT
8. DIM ENSIONS TO WA LLS ARE TO THE FACE OF FINISH OF THE WALL AT INTERIOR AND TO EXTERI OR FACE OF SHEATHING
AT EXT ERIO R, U.N.O .
9. CEILING HEIGHTS TO BE AS INDICATED ON THE REFLECTE D CEILI NG PL AN AND FINISH S CHEDULE. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF
ANY DISC REPAN CIES
10, REFERENCE FURNITURE PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY . FURNITURE PROVIDED BY OWNER , C OORDINATE WIT H
ARCHITECT
11. A RCHITECT NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR DETECTI ON AND/ OR ABATE MENT OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO LEAD. MOLD AND RADON
12. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS F OR CONSTR UCTI ON PURPOSES
13. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR W OOD FRA MING REQUIREMENTS
14. CABINETS, COUNTERTOPS. ETC. S HOWN TO BE 'RELOCATED ' WILL BE RE MOVED FROM THE OWNER 'S CURRENT FACILITY
RELOC ATED TO THE NEW FACILITY AND RE -INSTALLED BY THE OWNER 'S VENDOR. ORIGINAL R OOM NO 'S REFERENCED
ARE FOR COORDINATION PURPOSES ONLY. CO NTRACTO R(S) SHALL COORDIN ATE WITH VENDOR F OR LOCATIO N OF
BLOCKING . PLUMBIN G ROUGH -INS . ETC. TO ENSURE A C OMPLETE 'LIKE NEW INSTALLATI ON OF ALL RELOCATED
MATERI ALS. NOTIF Y ARCHITECT OF A NY DISC REPANCIES
SY MBOLS
0-
X
Y
J
X
Y
WALL TYPE: REFER TO W ALL TYPE
SCHEDULE
ROOM NUMBER:
X = ROOM NAME
Y = RO OM NU MBER
ENLARGED DETAIL: REFER TO DETAIL
NUMBER 'X' ON SHEET NUMBER 'AX'
INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR ELEVATION:
REFER TO ELEVATION NU MBER 'X' ON
SHEET NUMBER 'AX'
BUILDING OR W ALL SECTION:
REFER TO BUILDING OR WALL
SECTION NUMBER 'X' ON SHEET
NUMBER 'AX'
DOOR NUMBER: REFER TO DOOR
SCHEDULE
KEYED N OTE: REFER TO NOTE 'X' ON
INDIVIDUAL PLANS
ELEVATION HEIGHT M ARKER:
'X' = ITEM
= HEIGHT
INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR WINDOW
TYPE
ARCHITECTU RE
INTERIOR DESIGN
3 2013
INSIDE OUTSIDE
A RCHITECTURE, INC.
Lea E. K angas
18601 152nd A VE N
DAY TON, MN 55327
763-428-5870
BJ BAAS
PROJECT
Complete
Eye Care
Medi na, MN
CO NTE NTS
TITLE SHEET
CODE SUMMAR Y
CERTIFIC ATIO N
I hereby certify that this pla n, specificatio n
or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervisio n a nd that I am a duly
Lice nsed Professio nal Architect under
the laws of the State of Mi nnesota.
L4e-
State Registratio n # 26203
Date 05-9-2013
T1
* COPYRIGHT 2013 C.
This pla n is c opyrighted and shall he used
only for the building sh own a nd
is not to be copied or reproduced without writte n
permission fr om Inside Outside Architecture, Inc .
N
0,INLETPROTECTION (3 EA)
OSILT F EN CE (300 LF)
OCONCRETE WASHOUT AREA
q41°-/:
TUM/NODS
OUS CURB
OCONSTRUCT 6' 1:12 RAMP
W ITH 1:10 WINGS
O CONSTRUCT 5' 1:12 RAMP
W ITH 1:10 W IN GS
G CUT IN 8x6 W YE
90' of 6" SCHEDULE 40 PVC @ 5.0%
6" WET TAP W/ VALVE
8 71' of 6" DIP (INCL 3— 45° BENDS)
O B612 CURB & GUTTER (160 LF)
eB612 CUR B & GUTTER (OUTFALL) 163 LF
11 CUT IN 6x 6 TEE, 8' OF 6" DIP
HYD W/ VALVE
0. POST INDICATOR VALVE
13 REMOVE AND R EPLACE BITUM IN IOUS INK IN D
NOTE: ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE
GU TTE RLINE OR PAVING GRADES
SEE ARCH ITECT PLAN FOR
ADDITIONAL DIMENSION S
`.,ro06,99.96,cm.sm9,9 -9ea. , v-e.mu 9057 .,, CST
w
3
E
GRA PHIC SCALE
(m FEET )
MAINTAIN ACCESS TO EXISTING
BUILDING AT ALL TI MES
Erosion Pr eventi on Practices
D escription of co nstructio n pha sing, veg etati ve buffer strips , horizo ntal slope
gr ading, a nd other co nstructio n pr actices to be used to mi nimiz e er osio n:
Stage the s ail dist urbi ng activiti es to mi nimi ze the amount of dist urbed soil
pri or to stabiliz ation. Dist urbed ar eas will be consid er ed stabilized wh en cov ered
with materials such os a nch ored m ul ch, stoked so d, riprop, wo od fib er blank et,
or other materi als that pre vent e ro sion from occurring. G rass s eeding alo ne
will not be considered st abiliz atio n.
Disturb only those areas where p roposed co ntours and ele vations are shown to
diff er from the e xisti ng and whe re removals and other operati ons are noted.
Spe cial a rea s of the proj ect site th at ore not to be disturbed by co nstructio n
acti vity or e noted on th e pl an.
In stall wood fibe r bla nk et wh ere show n on the pl an to p rovid e temp orary erosi on
protecti on .
Description of temporary er osion pr ot ectio n or p erm ane nt cov er to be used f or
exposed positiv e sl op es withi n 200 lineal f eet of a su rf ace wat er (str eam, lake,
pond, ma rsh, wetl and, r eservoir, spri ng, riv er, storm water basi n, storm water
drai nage sy stem, wat erw ays, wate r cou rses, a nd irrigati on system whether
surfa ce water is natur al or artifi cial, p ubli c or p ri vate with ma xim um time an
exposed s oil ar ea ca n remain exposed when the a rea is not actively bei ng
w orke d:
Provide year round stabilizati on to the ab ove me ntion ed are as in a ccorda nc e
with th e following table .:
Ste epne ss of sl ope ( H:V)
Gre ater than 3:1
J:1 thr ough 10:1
Less than 10:1
Maximum E xpo sure
Dur ation Whe n Areo
Is Not Actively W ork ed
7 Days
14 D ays
14 Days
Description of p ractices to be used to st abilize the normal wetted perimeter of
d rainag e or diversio n ditches within 200 lineal feet of the property edge or
point of di scharg e to a surfac e w ater within 24 hou rs of connecti ng th e ditch
to th e su rface wat er:
I nst all seed, f ertiliz er, and disc —anchor ed m ul ch or t emp or ar y w ood fiber bl ank et
in ditch es and sw ai ns within 24 h ours of connecting th e dit ch or swale to the
surfa ce water where sh ow n on the pla n in accord ance with th e details .
Description of other erosion p re vention pr actice s to be used:
Install the specified energy di ssipati on method, such os riprop a nd ge otextil e
f ab ric, at pip e o utlets within 24 hours of i nstallatio n. Permane ntly s eed
di st urb ed a rea s p ri or to end of seedi ng d otes specified by MnDDT.
S ediment Contr ol Pr actic es
Descriptio n of sedim ent contr ol p ractices to be used to minimi ze sediment s
from entering surface w aters, incl uding c urb and g utter systems and storm
drai n inlets:
Perm anent s edim ent control pr actices to be used on this project consist of
sedime ntati on b asin s. Tempor ary sedime nt co ntr ol pr acti ces to be used ore silt
fe nce, cul vert inlet p rote cti on, sto rm sewer inl et pr ot ectio n, stone pod e xits,
concr ete washout a rea, ditch che cks, and, if ne ces sary, st reet swe eping.
Ovraaa PAST.
MST. OP POC O
P OST O ff SWF
(Ao,we x Awl
MAW DUTY
NCH ROM SAS
OPEC
N"DE YM s-i
PrIWOOKEI TCTIT
'1.11.01 8.00111C1-0171
I.P(17 NATURAL SO S
NOTE SUMO. UPONOM TO
met' W. WON HO E A.STEM �,S :w ,,.ET ..
SLT FENCE
NOES:
• 'MMCO CC MODEL OR APPROVED EQU AL TO MATCH CASTING
• S.LI FENCE/FABRIC NOT ALLO WED TO DE USED AS INLET
PROTECTION
a
i
c
m
tn
z
0
fax 763-689-6681
Cd
a
TO
TO
TO
N
COMPLET E EYE CAR E
GRADING & D RAINAGE PLAN
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
Cl
J
N
PLANTING REQUIREMENTS
TREES :
OVERSTORY DE CIDU OUS TR EES 2-I/2- DIAMETER MEASURED 4'
FROM TH E BASE AT P LANTIN G
OR NAMENTAL TREES 2 DIAM ETER MEASURED 4' FROM THE BA SE
AT PLANTING
TR EE QUAN TITY REQUIREMENTS
-PER PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
PLAN
SH RUB REQUIREMENTS SUPPLEMENTAL
SHRUBS:
M INIM UM SPREAD OF 24 INCHES AT PLANTING.
PLANTING COMPUTATIONS
TREES
EXISTING 0
PR OPO SED J (OVERSTORY)
7 (ORNAMENTAL)
SHRUBS
EX ISTIN G O
PR OP OSED J2
ALL GR EEN SPACE SHALL BE IR RIGATED.
IRRIGATION PLAN BY OTHERS.
w
E
S
GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET )
BITUMINOUS PANNG
-111-111-1 I
_I I -I I -I I-1
111111111—IIHI��/011�ik
I —'"—
BARN MULC H
PL ANTING SOIL
1 - r
II —III —III
= I 1=111=1 I IE5 1
11 / _-111 11—
-I 11-1 1-111 111=1'
DECIDUOUS TREE PIANING DETAIL
NOT TO S CALE
SET R OOTB .41 ON
UNDISTURBED EARTH
COLE QTY COMM C8J/BDTANICN_NAME S E SJAONGQC
Fes, FallgoldAsh /Raxinusnigra'Fallgold' 25' E8 ASS -ON')
an 1.. Bu r Oak/ Cu ercusmaxoca rpa 25' FB ASS -C AN
PFC 2 R ofuson Oab/ Malu s'Pro fuson' 1 .5' BB ASS -ON')
Sr 4 Spring Slo w Crab/ M al us'Q ring &lad 1.5' 138 ASS-Id✓IN
R S✓ 1 Fbd SDIendor Qab / M alus'Fird SDI ender' 1.5' BB ASS-IOAN
MA) 12 M aney.Lniper / Juniperuschi nenss'Maneyl' 36 S= RD., FOT 4-0' QC
TAY 8 Taunton Yew/ Torus medil Taunton 24'S4;0.,F OT 4-0' 0.0
LL H 6 Umeliqit HydraTgeal Fydrax ,)eapaniculatatimelight' 24' HE, F OT 5-0' O.0
NFS 6 Neo n Flash Soires/ Sol raeajaponic a'Neon H all' 24'14T ., RJT 3-0' O.0
N OTE
ALL OTHER PE RVIOUS AREAS S HALL RE SODDED
BARK MULCH
TO EXTE NT OF LOWER LI MBS
1-1 1 1-111-1 1 1=111-111-1 —
111--1 I��=111=1 1 1=111=111=111=
I —I I I —III —III III III III III 1 1 1—I I
CONIF ERO US IRE RANTING ING OETM
NOT TO SUL E
TOPSOIL
LOOSENED SUBSOIL
(NOTE: MIN. 10 FT.
BEYOND TREE
ALL DIRECTIONS)
PLANTI NG SOIL
SET ROOTBALL ON
UNDISTURBED EARTH
O
AL
ti
0
1I
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
C3
I
®SITE PLAN KEYNOTES
' \ /
- -
A PROPERTY LINE - S EE CI VIL
B. SETB ACK LI NE - SEE CIVIL
C. BITUMINOUS PARKING/ DRIVE
D. WHITE PAINTED STRIPING - TYPICAL
E. CONCRETE CURB
F. CONC RETE SIDE WALK
G. ACCESSIBLE CU RB RAMP
H. SOD, SEED OR NATURAL AREA (SEE CIVIL)
I. CONCRETE STO OP WITH MASO NR Y FO UNDATIO N TO F ROST DEPTH
J. PREF ORME D C ONCRETE SPLAS H BLOCK - MINIMUM LEN GTH DE
TYPICAL AT ALL DOW NSPOUT LOCATIONS
K. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SI GN - SEE 2/AS
L. UTILITY EASE MENT - SEE CIVIL
N. ACCESS L ADIA GONAL STRIPI NG
N. UNIVERS AL ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL PAI NTED WITH BLUE
GENERAL SITE PLAN NOTES
__ / /
_ _ - `'INFORMATION
`' '' /
_ - -_-7 ' / J `, -"/ /
/
1. SEE CIVIL D RAWINGS AND CONSTR UCTION DETAILS F OR ADDITIONAL
2. THE GENER AL CONTR ACTOR SHALL VERIFY E XACT LO CATI ON OF ALL
SITE UTILITIES INCL UDI NG SHUT- OFF VALVES. SWIT CHES, ETC. AND
THEIR ABILIT Y TO SH UT OFF P ROPE RLY IN CASE OF AN E MERGENCY
/ —
-
MUNICIPAL CODE PROPOSED
_/
` - _ --- B
/ - /
--1 --, / ,
- / -
/ /
/ -
/ /
D E r \
-- , D - _ , - \\
\ _ \
I\ / /7/- 1 --` �
/,///
/ '- l
/ L _ __- N / ' /
, / ( PICA ) / / L /
�
` `lf- / PARKIN- / /
ZONE: CH -RR REAR Y ARD SETBACK: ADJ USTED TO
ZERO EXCEPT 10' UTILIT Y EASMENT
FR ONT Y ARD SET BACK: 25 FT SIDE YARD SETBACK: 15 FT AND 28 FT
SIDE YARD SETBACK: 15 FT
REAR YARD SETBACK: 0 FT DUE TO PA RKING SETB AC K: SHARED/JOINT
FR ONTAGE ROA D SETB ACK PA RKING
PARKING SETBACKS: 10' EXCEPT TO IMPERVIOUS SU RFACE COVERAGE: 78°h
ACCOMODATE SHARED/JOINT P ARKING
ACROSS A COM MON LO T LI NE BUILDIN G HEIGHT: 2To' FT
I MPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: 80 a AVERAGE HEIGHT OF HIGHEST R OOF
PE R CODE)
MAX BUILDIN G HEIGHT: 30 FT
/ / A _ STALL , /
�� • `\`� /1 / i L — - /I E' / -
1 \ / G M j I
��•,� (DI
-
CENTER ON STAL L
/ a_- '
/ / I.-
/ /` /
.-0.
AS REQUIRED BYESSI
1 IN ACCESSIBLE
/ _• �� y
/ / / w
/ l l� •^ F'/ 0/00 �`�����
`
\
STALLSEVERY
STALLS (B UT NOT LESS
THAN 1) MUST BE VAN
ACCESSIBLE.PROVIDE
/[`_
/ /0 / / /►
r
RE.
SIGNS AS
SIGNS
/ jj' t�
/ / H
/ / 59'.g. / / •
/ , / / `
/ /
•� d / E
ICS4'.
�- DISABLED PA RKIN G
NAVE
SIGN BACKGROUND
BLUE W/WH1TE LETTERS
AGR APHICS
`�
/ /
'`1` ' / ( / / /
/
DISABLED
PARKING
STATE PER MIT
ENFORCEMENT NOTICE
-
1� � • /
\ zB, e• / / i • ' 111
N LA....RED
, ` UP TOt �N
PER STATE
REQUIREMENTS
`
• H \�
/ / `,
4'-0' l CE NTER OF SIG N
�-
AT VAN ACCESSIBLE
• /. ° ,
•• Q •/ , / �
L • / • / / ��
A \I o •-� / 25'177/4^
O •'� :
NW ACCES__
�_
VAN
STALLS. MOUNT AN
NBELGN
T ADDITI ONAL HEHA HAN DICA PPED
THE HA NDICAPPED SIGN
\
R AAA
I O�7 QO �OQ000 \- -\� ---- -
'' , \ --
'a '
z 1,2• X 21 n• z us-
GALV.STEEL P OST W(T OP
CAPPED. PRIMED F OR
FIELD FINISHING.
CONCRETE WALK
-
G
RO4 \
EMBED METAL C YLINDER
i SLEEVE INTO CONCRETE
F OOTI NG. INSER T SIG N
SUPPORT P OST , GROUT
AND CAUOTT
° \`
TO SLCT URE
OF POST TO SLEEVE.
EEVE.
•
"I/ POURED CONCRETE
F N $ G RADE
L NOTE SEE KEY NOTE le
ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
- ___J
ACCESSIBLE P ARKING SIGN
1/16" =1.-o•
1 1/2" = 1,0"
A RCHITECT URE
INTE RIOR DESIGN
INSIDE OUTSIDE
ARCHITECTURE, INC.
Lea E. Kangas
18601 152nd AVE N
DA YTON, MN 55327
763-428-5870
BJ BAAs
BUILDERS INC.
PROJECT
Complete
Eye Care
Medina, MN
CO NTENTS
ARCHITECTURAL
SITE PL AN
CERTIFICATIO N
I hereby certify that this plan, specification
or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision a nd that I am a duly
Licensed Pr ofessional Architect u nder
the laws of the State of Minnesota.
4e -g.
State Registration # 26203
Date 05-9-2013
AS
COPYRIGHT 2013 4 J'
This pla n is copyrighted a nd shall he used
only for the building shown and
is not to be copied or repr oduced without written
permission from Inside Outside Architecture , Inc.
0131'4'
T.O . RIDGE
30 YEAR ARCHITECTURAL HIGH
DEFINITION SHINGLES WITH
STAR TER STR IP
QTRUSS123' -A
BRG
0120'-3 '
T.O. RIDGE
PRE -FINISHED
M ETAL STANDING
SEAM ROOFING
111'-0'
�IH�J-B�i
q110'-0'
Y IND HEAD
TH IN CUT
APPLIED BRICK
/02'A"1 O SILL
100' -0'
NISH LOOR
23'-&
dTR USS BAG
COO RDINATE EXTERIOR SIGNAGE
REQ UIREMENTS WITH O WNER
CO NTINUOUS
SH INGLE OV ER'
RIDGE VEN T - TYP
ALL RIDG ES
THIN CUT
APPLIED STONE
PRECAST
CONCRETE SILL
NO RTH ELEVATION
1/8' = 1• -0 -
/
CON TIN UOUSS HINGLE OVER ' R IDG E VENT
ARCHITECTUR AL
ALL RIDGES
30 YEAR ARCHIHIGH
DEFINITION SHINGLES WITH
STARTER STRIP
EXTERIOR LIGHTING - CO ORDINATE
REQUIREMENTS WITH ELECTRICAL
THIN CUT APPLIED STO NE
112'-0 3/4'
SECON D FLOOR,
PRECAST CONCRETE
LINTEL
WEATHER PROOF THIN CUT THIN CUT APPLIED
ELECTR ICAL O UTLET- A PPLIED BR ICK STONE BASE WITH
COORDINATE WITH PRECAST CON CR ETE
ELECTR ICAL SILL/ CA P
11C-60
12'6 314'
SECOND FLOOR
109'-0'
O TRUSS BAG
toT-2'
WNDIDR
D
DECO RATIVE METAL VENT
THIN CUT APPLIED STONE
SEE DOOR SCHEDULE FOR
EXTERIOR FIN ISH
x1DO-U' �4
FINISH FLOOR
EXTERIOR LIGHTING -COO RDINATE
REQUIREMENTS WITH ELEC TRICAL
SOUTH ELEVATION
118' = 1'-0'
/// CO NTIN UOUS ' SHIN GLE O VER'
RIDGE VENT - TYP ALL RIDGES
30 YEAR ARCHITEC TU RAL H IGH
DEFINITION SHINGLES WITH
STARTER STRIP
15A
HOSE BIB - COORDINATE WITH
M ECH ANICAL
PVC TRI
G YP BOAR D AT BO TTOM OF
TRUSS TYP. SEE RCP' FO R
FINISH CEILING INFORMATIO N
D OUBLE 2X 6 TOP PLA TE -
SEE STRUCTURAL
EXTERIOR FIN ISH AS SCH ED ULED
BUILDING WRAP - TAPE JOIN TS
SH EATH IN G - SE E STR UCTURAL
2X6 WOOD STU DS AT 16' O.C. MAX
FULL THICK BATT INSULATIO N
6 M IL (M IN) POLY VA PO R BARRIER
5/8' TYPE 'X GY P BOA RD
2X 6 TREA TED BOTTOM PLATE WITH
SILL SEAL - REFER TO STRUCTURA L
FOR INFO
APPLY CAULK/ SEALANT
AT BASE OF GYP BD AND
EX TERIOR S HEA THIN G
OEXTERIOR WA LL SLA B AND FOUN DATION
1
GENERAL CONSTRUCTIO N TYPE NO TES:
1. A LL WA LL TYPES SHO WN ARE LOAD
OR NON -LOAD BEARING
2. ALL WALL TYPES ARE NON -RATED
CONTSTRUCTION
3. INTERIOR WA LL DIMENSIO NS ARE TO
FACE OF WALL FINISH UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE
CONSTRUCTION TYPES
3/4' = 1' -0'
EXTERIO R LIGHTING -
COORDINATE
REQU IREM ENTS WITH
ELECTRIC AL
CEMENT BOARD SIDING
PVC T RIM -
SEE SECTIONS
DOUBLE 27, TOP PLATE - SEE
STRUCTURAL FOR
ATTACHMENT REQ UIREMENTS
GYP BOARD AT B.O. T RUSS - TYP
SEE REFLECTED CEILING
PLA N FOR FIN ISH CEILING
TYPE AN D HEIGHT
5/B' TYPE 'X GYP BD. BOTH SIDES
2x4 or 28 6 WOOD STU DS
AT 16' O.C. MAX
28 TREATED BO TTOM PLA TE -
REFER TO STRUCTU RAL FOR
ATTACHMENT REQUIREMENTS
TOP OF FLO OR SUBSTRATE
K>NTERIOR WALL - NON -BEARING
K>NTERIOR
STUDS
INTERIO R WALL - BEA RING / NO N-BEARING
286 STUDS
2B INTERIO R WALL - NON-BEARING
2x4 STUDS - 1 HR RATED -GAWP 3514
4. EX TERIO R WALL DIM ENSIONS ARE TO 6. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWING S FOR
EXTERIOR FA CE OF EXTERIOR BEAR ING WA LL LOCATION S AND
SHEATHING. FACE OF SH EA THING AD DITIONAL FRAM ING INFORMATION
ALIGNS WITH FACE OF FOUNDA TION
5. FRAMING CONTRACTOR VERIFY
STUD/WALL DEPTH REQU IRED FOR
WALLS WITH PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL.
ETC. NO TIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY
DEPTH CHANGES REQUIRED
TRUSS 109BR' -0' G
PRE -FINISHED
METAL G UTTER S
AND DOWNSP OUTS
PV C TRIM
CEMEN T BOA RD SIDING
PVC TRIM - SEE SECTIONS
HOSE BIB - C OO RDINAT E
WITH MECHANICAL
C ONTINUOUS ' SH IN GLE OVER'
R IDGE VE NT - TY P ALL RIDG ES
30 YEAR ARCHITECTURAL HIGH
DEFIN ITION SHIN GLES WITH
STARTER STRIP
THIN CUT
APPLIED BRICK
C TRIM
T HIN CUT APPLIED STONE
BA SE WITH PRECAS T
CO NC RETE SILL/ CA P
PRE -FIN ISHED M ETAL
GUTTERS AN D DO WNSPO UTS
THIN CUT APPLIED STONE
1126 3/4'
OSECOND FLOOR
111'-0'
U BRG
110'-0'
' WN D HEAD /
4109'-0'
'TRUSS BRG
02.8'
T. O. SILL
100'-0'
IR ISH FLO
131'4'
T.O. RIDGE
CEMENT BO ARD
SIDING
P VC T RIM -
SEE SECTIONS
EAST ELEVATION
1/8' = 1'-0'
TH IN CUT TH IN CUT APPLIED STON E
A PPLIED BRICK BA SE WITH PRECAST
CONCRETE SILL/ CAP
CON TINU OUS 'SH INGLE OVER' RIDGE
V ENT - TYP ALL RIDG ES
30 YEAR ARCHITECTURAL HIG H
DEFINITION SHINGLES WITH STARTER
STRIP
CONTINUO US 'SHINGLE OVER' RIDGE
VENT -T YP ALL RIDGES
30 YEA R ARCHITECTURAL HIGH
DEFINITION SHING LES WITH STARTER
STRIP
THIN CU TPRECAST
APPLIED STONE CONCRETE SILL
PRE -FINISHED METAL
STA ND IN G SEAM ROOFING
PRECA ST CONCR ETE
LIN TEL
111'-0' p
TRU SS BRIT
THIN CUT
APPLIED BR ICK
104'-0'
T.O. BASE 0
EMERG ENCY KEY
(KNOX)BOX-
IRED
BY CO DE AN D/OR
LOCAL AUTHO RITIES
THIN CUT APPLIED STONE
BASE WITH PRECAST
CONCR ETE SILL/ CA P
CONTIN UOUS 'SHINGLE OVE R' RIDGE
/— VENT - TYP AT ALL RIDGES
123'6'
TRUSS BRG
120-3'
0'1.0 '. RID GE
111'-0'
O TRUSS BRG
109'-0' TRUSS BRG
THIN CUT
APPLIED BR ICK
Q 102'-B'
T. O. SILL
00'-0'
OFINISH LOOR
2X6 DOUBLE TOP PLATE -
SEE STRUCTURA L FOR
AT TACHMENT RQR MN TS
GY P BOA RD AT BO TTO M OF
TRUSS- TYP, SEE SECTIONS
SEE R EFLECTED CEILING
PLA N FOR FIN ISH CE ILING
TY PE AND HEIG HT - TYP
SO UND BATT INSU LATION
(NON-COM BUSTIBLE)
2x6 WOOD STU DS AT 16' O.C. MA X
5/8' MOISTURE RESISTAN T GYP
BD. - PROVIDE CEM ENT BACKER
BOARD AT PLUMBING FIXTURE
WA LLS SC HEDULED FOR
CERAM IC TILE
2x TREATED BO TTOM PLATE -
REFER TO STRUCTURAL FOR
A TTAC HMENT R EQUIR EMENTS
TOP OF FLOOR SUBSTRATE
3 PLUMBING WALL
VERIFY WIDTH OF WA LL REQUIRED
WITH PLU MBING CONTR ACTOR
FLOO R / CEILING ASSE MBLY
AT SECOND FLOOR
FINISH FLOOR AS SCHEDULED
PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR-SEE
STRUCTURAL
TRUSS- SEE STRUCTURAL
BATT/BLOWN I NSULATION - FULL
DEPTH OF T RUSS
5/8' TYPE'S' G YP BD AT B OTTO M
OF FLOOR TRUSS - TYP
30 YEA R A RCHITECTURAL H IGH
DEFINITION SH INGLES WITH STARTER
STRIP
CONTIN UOUS ' SHINGLE OVER' RIDG E
VEN T - TYP AT A LL RIDG E
THIN CUT A PPLIED STONE
BA SE WITH PRECAST
CO NCRETE SILL/ CA P
WEST ELEVATION
1/8' = 1'-0'
TRIMWINS)SPANDRELGLASS
CEMENT B OA RD SIDI NG WI ND OW - SEE WINDOW T YP ES
PVC TRIM - SEE SECTIONS
CEILING / ROOF ASSEMBLY
4 3/4 '
/2'
KNEE WALL
6
ROOFING AS SC HEDULED
WATER P ROTECTI ON B ARRIER , 158
FELT PAPER (MIN) -
SEE SECTI ONS
PLYW OOD OR OSA S HE ATHI NG - SEE
STRUCT URAL DRAWINGS
AIR VENT CHUTES - TYPICAL
AT ALL TRUSS SPACES
STARTER STRIP AND WATER
PROTECTION MEMBRANE
TRUSSES AT 24' O.C . - SE E
STRUCTUR AL DRAWINGS
INSULATION STOP
R-30 MIN BATT OR BLOWN INSUL
6 MIL (MIN) V AP OR BAR RIER
5/8 ' TYPE 'X GYP BOARD - TYP
SEE ROOF PLA N, SECTIONS AND
DETAILS FOR ADDITIO NAL
INF OR MATION
3/4' WOOD CAP
5/8' TYPE 'X ' GYP BD.
BOTH SID ES
2 X4 W OOD STUDS
24 ' O.C.
30 YEAR A RCHITECTURAL HI GH
DEFINITION SHINGLES WITH STARTER
STRIP
121'-103/4'
WND HEAD
THIN CUT APPLIED STONE
112E 3/4 '
SECOND FLO OR
10 T-2'
WND HEAD
THIN CUT APPLIED STONE
GENER AL EXTERIOR ELEVATI ON N OTES
1. DO N OT SCALE DRAWINGS FOR CONS TRUCTIO N P URPOSES. USE
PLAN INFOR MATION , DIMENSIONS, DETAILS. SHOP DRAWINGS AND
FIELD VERIFICATI ON.
2- REFER TO FLO OR PL AN, RO OF PLAN, AND SECTI ONS F OR ADDITION AL
INFORMATION
3. FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS PRI OR TO STARTIN G
A NY W ORK. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF DISCREPANCIES
4. PROVIDE VER TICAL CONTROL J OINTS IN STO NE A ND/O R BRICK AT
LOCATIONS BY ' ME ANS AND METHODS ' REQUIRED
5. PROTECT ALL INSTALLED DOORS, WINDOWS, FRAMES. ETC FROM
OTHER C ONSTRUCTION W ORK IN PROGRESS
6. ALL DOORS AND WIND OWS TO BE AS S CHEDULED . SEE FINISH
SPECIFICATI ONS AND D OOR SCHEDULE FOR ADDITI ON AL
INFORMATION
7. RO OF OVE RHA NGS A RE TO BE 18' FROM FACE OF SHEATHING TO
FACE OF FASCIA • SEE SE CTIONS
EXTERIOR ELEVATI ON LEGEND
NOTE: ALL E XTERIOR MATERIAL COLORS TO BE DETERMINED BY THE
ARCHITECT
Iry�
111(!1
DESI GNATES APPLIE D THIN STONE
DESI GNATES APPLIED THIN C UT B RICK
DESIGNATES CE MENT LAP BOARD SIDING (8 ' EXPOSURE)
DESI GNATES MET AL STA NDI NG SEAM ROOFING
DESIGNATES ARCHITECT URAL SHI NGLES
EXTERIOR MATERIALS
TOTAL BUILDILNG FACADE 3.90850 FT
STONE: 2204 SQ FT - 56 %
BRICK: 517 SQ FT- 13 %
SIDING: 709 SO FT - 18 %
OPE NINGS: 478 SO FT
ARCHITE CTURE
INTERIOR DESIGN
INSIDE OUTSIDE
ARCHITECTUR E, INC.
Lea E. hangas
18601 152nd A VE N
DAYTON, MN 55327
763-428-5870
BJBUILDERS 1,5
PROJECT
Complete
Eye Care
Medina, MN
CONTENTS
EXT ERIOR
ELEVATIONS &
CONST RUCTION
TYPES
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that this plan, specificatio n
or report was prepared by me or under my
direct s upervisio n and that 1 am a duly
Licensed Professional Architect under
the laws of the State of Minnesota .
StateRegistration # 26203
Date 05-9-2013
A3
* COPYRIG HT 2013 O*
This plan is copyrighted and shall he used
only f or the budding show n a nd
is n ot to be copied or reproduced with out written
pe rmission from Inside O utside Architecture , Inc.
CONTINUOUS 'S HINGL E O VER' RIDGE VENT
131'-0'
@T. O. RIDGE
123'-6'
@T RUSS ERG
APPLIE D THI N ST ONE
RO OF TRUSSES - SEE STRUCTURAL
FOR DESIGN REQUIREME NTS
112'-6 3/4•
@SECON D FLO OR
11RUS1'-0'
S 'TBR
109'-0'
@ TRUSS BRG
BATT OR BLOWN IN
INSULA TION (R-30. 0
MIN. )- TYP
SEE EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS AND
DETAILS FOR
EXTERIOR
MA TERIA LS
100'-0'
@FINISH FLOOR
T.O. FOOTING r
@SEE STRUCTURA L I
BUILDLING SECTIO N
1/4" =
12
61 —
EXAM ROOM
OPEN TO
BUSINESS
OFFICE
LANDI NG
FRAMING - SEE
ST RUCTUR AL
CORRIDOR
4" CONC. SLAB -ON -GRADE OV ER 10 MIL MIN
VAPOR BARRIER AND GRANULAR FILL
CMU OR POURED FOU NDATION -
SEE STR UCTURAL
RIGID INSULATION - R-10.0 MIN.
-0
ROOF TRUSSES - SEE
STRUCTURAL FOR DESIGN
REQUIREMENTS
BATT OR BLO WN IN
INSULATION (R-30.0 MIN.)
TYP
FLOOR JO ISTS - SEE
STRUCTURAL FOR DESIGN
REQUIREMENTS
FILL FLR/CLG CA VITY FULL
W/BLOWN IN INSULA TION
-
TYP
5/8" TYPE 7C GYP BD B.O .
TRUSS - TYP
0
CONTINUOUS 'SHINGLE OVER" RIDGE VENT
30 Y EA R AR CHITECTURAL H IGH DEFINITION
SH ING LES WITH STAR TER STRIP -
30 YEA R ARCHITE CTURAL HI GH DEFINITION
SHINGLES WITH STARTER STRIP - TYP. AT ALL
ROOF AREAS
OOF TRUSSES - SEE STRUCTU
F OR DESIG N REQUIREMENTS
VENTILATIO N AIR C HUTE —
B ATT OR BL OWN IN INSUL ATI ON
(R-30 .0 MIN.) - TYP
T. O. L ANDIN
JANITO R
ACT CEILING
AS SCHED ULE D
FINISH GYP BD WALL
AS SCHEDULED
1-114• WOOD STAI R
RAIL B OTH SIDES -
FINISH AS SCHEDULED
FLOOR JOISTS - SEE
STRUCTURAL FOR DESI GN
REQUIRE MEN TS
PLY 5/8 ' TYPE 'X
G D AND FINISH
ASS i LED
SELF ADHERING WATER PROTECTION M EM BRANE
(48' INBOARD FROM EXTERIOR WALL FACE AT ALL
\ ROOF EDGES AND 18' EITHER SIDE OF VA LLE YS)
"—PREFINISH ED METAL DRIP EDGE FLASHING AT
ALL ROOF EDGES •
PR E -FINISHED META L OVER IX CEDAR FASCIA
CO NTINUOUS PRE -FINISHED VENTILATED SOFFIT
4' CO NC. SLA B -O N -GRADE OVER 10 ML M IN
VAPO R BARRIER AND GRANULAR FILL
PARTIAL BUILDLING SECTION
1/2" = 1'-0•
18 RISER
@627132'
TO LANDING
ROOF TRUSSES - SEE STRUCTURAL
FOR DESIGN REQUIREM EN TS
6
B USINESS
OFFICE
D OOR
#107
BA TT OR BLOWN
IN INSULA TION
(R-30.0 MIN.) - TYP
V ESTIBULE
R IG ID INSULATION - R10.0 M IN.-
CMU OR POURED FOUNDATION
- SEE STRUCTURAL
P OUR ED FO OTING - S EE
STRUCTURAL
SELF ADHERING WATER P RO TECTION MEMBRANE
(48' INB OARD F ROM E XTERI OR WALL FA CE AT ALL
RO OF E DGES AND 1B' EIT HER SIDE OF VALLEYS)
PREFINISHED METAL DRIP ED GE FLASHING AT
ALL ROOF EDGES
P RE -FI NISHED METAL OVER 1X CEDA R FASCIA
PRE -FINISHED METAL GUTTE RS AND
DOWNSPO UTS
C ONTINUOUS PRE -FINISHED
VENTILATED S OFFIT
CORRIDOR
ROOF T RUSSES - SEE STRUCTUR AL
FOR DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
ARCH
SEE PLAN
OPTICAL/W AITING
CONTINUOUS 'SHINGLE OVER' RIDGE V ENT
30 YEAR ARCHITECTURAL HI GH DEFINITION
SHINGLES WITH STARTER STRIP
L
urGE
T.O. RIDG.
TRUSS '-6-p
123BRG
SELF ADHERIN G WATER PROTECTI ON MEMBR ANE
(48 ' INBOARD FRO M EXTERIOR WA LL FACE AT ALL
RO OF EDGES AND 18' EITHER SIDE OF V ALLEYS)
PREFINISHED METAL DRIP EDGE FLASHING AT
ALL ROOF EDGES
PRE -FINISHED METAL OVER IX CEDAR FASCIA
30 YE AR ARCHITECTURAL HIGH DEFINm ON
2 SHINGLES WITH STA RTER STRIP
—18
-J
112'
T. O. SEC�DTL -600 3/4'R •
111 '-0'
TRUSS RRLP
110-0'
DR HEAD "
PR E -FINISHED METAL
VENTILA TED SOFFIT
GRADE VARIES
00-0'
FINISH FLOO R
T. O. FOOTING
SEE STRUCTURAL'
{
1
l
NOTE: SIM - C ONTINUOUS
PRE -FI NIS HED METAL
FLASHING . E XTEND 8'
VERTICAL AND 6' MIN
DOWN SLOPE OF ROOF
2X W OOD STUDS - SEE FL OOR
PLAN AND WALL TYPES
FULL T HICK BATT INS ULATI ON
- R-13.0 MIN - AT FINISHED
RO OM ONLY
ATTIC SPACE OR FI NISH R OOM
PER PLAN AND SECTIONS
aO W ALL TO R OOF C ONNE CTION
APPLIED NATURAL THIN STONE -
HOLD BOTTOM OF STONE 2' MI N
ABO VE FINIS H ROOFING
MATERIAL
6 MIL ( MIN) POLY VAPOR BARRIER
AT FINISHED ROO M ONLY
WALL SHEATHIN G - SEE
STRUCTUR AL
PRE -FINISHE D MET AL STEP
FL ASHI NG AT W ALL TO ROOF
INTERSECTION (SEE NOTE FOR
SIM CONDITION)
E XTEND CONTINU OUS WATER
PROTECTION MEMBRANE B' UP
FACE OF W ALL SHEATHING & OUT
OVER ROOF SHE ATHING
FINISH ROOFING - SEE ROOF PLAN
RO OF SHEATHING - SEE
STR UCTUR AL
ROOF TRUSSES - SEE
STRUCTURAL
C ONTINUOUS SHIN GLE OVER ' RIDGE VENT
30 YEAR ARCHITECTURAL HI GH DEFI NITIO N
SHINGLES WITH STARTER STRIP - TYP
R OOF SHE ATHING - SEE STR UCTU RAL
SELF - ADHERIN G WAT ER PROTECTION ME MBRANE
48 ' INBOARD FROM EXTERI OR WALL FACE AT ALL
V ROOF EDGES (AND 18' EITHE R SIDE OF VALLEYS)
BATT OR BLOWN IN INSULATI ON
(R-30 .0 MIN.)- TYP
P OL Y VA PO R BARRIER -6 MIL
MIN .
FINISH CEILING AS SCHEDULED -
SEE REFLECTED CEILING PLA N
AND FI NISH SCHED ULE
APPLIED 8' X 6' WOOD DEC OR ATIVE
BEAM(S), 4' WIDE AT SIDE W ALLS) -
SEE REFLECTED CEILING PL AN AND
FINISH SCHEDULE
S/8 ' TYPE 'X'
GYP BOARD
SEALANT AT PERIMETER -
TYPICAL BOTH SIDES
ALU MINU M WI ND OW AS SCHED ULED
ALL WI NDOW RE TURNS TO MATCH
WIND OW TRIM
EXPANSION F OAM AT PERIMET ER -
TYPI CAL AT ALL WINDOWS AND
E XTERIOR D OORS
GYP B OARD HEAD A ND JAMB
RETURNS TYPIC AL AT ALL
WINDOWS - FINISH AS SCHEDULED
SILL COVER AS SCHEDULED
2 x6 STUDS WI TREATED PLATE
FULL THICK BATT INSULATION - R-13.0 MIN.
POLY -V APOR BA RRIER - 6 MIL MI N
5/8' TYPE GYP BOARD
SEALANT -BOTH SIDES, C ONTINUOUS
4" CONC. SL AB -ON -GRADE OVER 10 MIL MIN
VAPOR BARRIER AND GRA NUL AR FILL
4'
•
1r2' RIGID I NSUL THERMAL BREAK
RIGID INSUL ATION -R-10.0 MIN .
CMU OR P OURED -
F OU NDATION -SEE
STRUCTUR AL
0
1 '-6'
PRE -FINISHED METAL DRIP -EDGE FLASHING AT ALL
ROOF EDGES
PRE -FINISHED METAL OVER 1x CEDAR FASCIA
PRE -FINIS HED METAL VENTILATED SOFFIT - TYP
APPLIED THIN BRICK (OR STONE) - SEE E XTERI OR
ELE VATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INF ORMATI ON
AIR BARRIER - TAPE JOI NTS
E XTERIOR SHEATHIN G
PRE -FINISHED METAL FLASHING ABOVE
LINTEL
B uss a 8• T G
PRECAST 8' ACCENT LINTEL - SEE
EXTERI OR ELEVATIONS F OR ADD'L
INF ORM ATION
PRE -FINISHED METAL FL ASHING BEL OW
LINTEL
APPLIED THIN BRICK (OR ST ONE) BEYOND -
REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS F OR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
PRE -FINISHED METAL FLASHING
TO MATCH WINDOW FR AME
PRE CAST SILL - CONTI NUOUS
OVER APPLIED STONE BASE
ONLY
102-8'
T. O. SILLAPPLIED THIN STONE
/AIR BARRIE R - T APE J OINTS
EXTERI OR SHEATHING
2• CLEARANCE TO GRADE OR
/ AS RE QUIRED BY ST ONE MF R
W ALL SECTION @ WINDOW
1/2" = 1'-0'
GRADE VARIES Np0•.0•
cwa t oo84
PREFI NISHED
ME TAL FLASHING
TAE FOOTING
VCTVeu,
ARCHITECTUR E
INTERIO R DESIGN
INSIDE OUTSIDE
ARCHITECTURE, INC .
Lea E. hangas
18601 152nd AVE N
DAY TON, MN 55327
763-428-5870
BJ B AAS
BUIL DERS
PROJECT
Complete
Eye Care
Medina, MN
CONTE NTS
BUILDING SECTI ONS
AND WALL SECTION
CERTIFICATIO N
I hereby certify that this plan, specification
or report was prepared by me or u nder my
direct s upervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Architect under
the laws of the State of Mi nnesota .
State Registration # 26203
Date 05-9-2013
A4
* COPYRIGH T 2013 3*
This pl an is copyrighted and shall he used
only for the building shown and
is not to be copied Or reproduced without written
permission from Inside O utside Architect ure , Inc.
ARCH ITECTURE
INTERIOR DESIGN
O PTICAL &
WAITING
1103 I
WD -1
OPTICAL
DISPENSING
I ISO 1 PT
PTB-
0-1
VP -1
SPRINKLER
RISER
ROO M
30
L
FP
VP -1
CT -1
CT -1
CPT -2
WD -1
STAFF
BREAK
ROOM
1 115 I
(CT-/
WD -1
CPTB- 1 PT -
DOCTORS
O FFICE
113 1
PT -2 CORRIDOR
1 1
PTB-
-0
5 -
V P-1 PT -1
RE -6 3/4
A LT
FIRST FLOOR FINISH PLAN
1/4" = 1'-0"
WD -1
0 1/4-
12-4 I/4.
VP CPT -1
T-2 WD-
-0 -
LOBBY
1 101A 1
T-
Al
O6
JAN
CONC
CPT -2
VP -1 CPT -2
0-1
PT
WD -1
PT-
PTB-
PRE-TEST
RO OM
101 I
REFRAC TION
ROOM
1031
PTB
PT -
WD -1 i
EXR
CORRIDOR
1m I
CORR IDOR
1106 I PT -
WD -1
EXAM
RO OM
11f6
LO GO
WALL
I I
CPTB-
LOBBY
lot 1 CT -4
T-4
VESTIBULE
11001
PT
CPTB-1
IR I
n
CPT -2 VP -1
M IR
D-1
VP -1
CORRIDOR
1 122 I
EXAM
ROOM
{-1tz l---
r��
F - LL
{
VISUAL
FIELDS
( 116 I
PTB
VP -1 ICPT-2
EXAM
ROOM
I 120 I
VP -1 CPT -2
d
T
WO MEN
1 123
CT -2
0
CTB-2
CT -3
EXAM
ROOM
1 121
PT
CPTB-
M ECH
2011
,c9E, 1
TAR
106A1
BU SIN ESS
O FFICE
200 1
PT -
PTA-
SECOND FLOOR FINISH PLAN
1/4' = 1L0"
FINISH PLAN SYMBOLS
z zz
XXX
///
XXX XXX
WALL FINISH AS SCHEDULED
FLOORING FINISH AS SCHEDULED
BASE AS SCHEDULED
CT -4 ACCENT TILE LOCATION (6' W)
FLOORING TRANSITION
N OTE: SEE ROOM FINISH
SCHEDULE AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
INSIDE OUTSI DE
ARCHITECTURE, INC .
Lea E. hangas
18601 152nd AVE N
DA YT ON, MN 55327
763-428-5870
BJ BAAS
RUI LO ERS
PR OJECT
Complete
Eye Care
Medina, MN
CONTE NTS
FINISH PLAN
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification
or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervisio n a nd that I am a d uly
Licensed Pr ofessio nal Architect under
the laws of the State of Minnesota .
State Registratio n # 26203
Date 05-9-2013
A9
* COPYRIG HT 2013 0*
This pla n is copyrighted and shall he used
only f or the building shown a nd
is n ot to be copied or reproduced without writte n
permission from Inside Outside Architecture , Inc.
4
AGENDA ITEM: 8
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC.
4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Telephone: 763.231 .2555 Facsimile: 763.231 .2561 planners!c.-nacplanning.com
MEDINA PLANNING REPORT
To:
Medina Planning Commission
Scott Johnson, City Administrator
From: Nate Sparks
Date: June 6, 2013
Meeting Date: June 11, 2013
Re: Sorley Comprehensive Plan Amendment
INTRODUCTION
Ned Sorley at 4200 Hillview Lane is seeking to have his rural property in the City of
Medina connected to the City of Loretto sewer system. In order to do so, he has made an
application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to be included in the Metropolitan
Urban Service Area.
SUBJECT SITE
The Sorley property is 6 acres in size and is located on the eastern side of Hillview Lane.
The western side of Hillview is within the City of Loretto, while the eastern side is within
the City of Medina. The property currently has a septic system. The property is currently
guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Developing Post -2030". It is zoned Rural
Residential -Urban Reserve.
REQUEST & SITE CONDITIONS
The applicant would like to replace the existing house which would require a new septic
system. The applicant's septic contractor could not find a suitable site near the desired
building site for a new septic. A new system would need to be placed in a more remote
location on the western side of the property. There is a portion of the property that has
steep slopes, as identified in the City's Open Space Plan as being 12 to 18% in grade.
Due to this topographic condition, the applicant would need to pipe under a ravine and
then pump up the hill to reach the location that is suitable for installation of a septic
system. Near the driveway to this property there is a manhole where the applicant could
hook up to the City of Loretto's sewer system. The applicant contends that this is a more
cost effective solution than replacing the septic system.
AMENDMENT REQUEST
In order to allow for an unsewered property to connect to the sewer system, a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment must be approved by the City. The property then
would be included within the City of Medina's sewered density calculation. In this case,
an amendment would need to be accompanied by an interconununity service agreement,
as well. If the amendment is approved and the Cities of Loretto and Medina enter into
the agreement, the applicant would be allowed to connect to the sewer system.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES
When the Comprehensive Plan was developed, the City considered land use in
coordination with transportation planning and sewer availability. The City's Land Use
Plan calls for incremental growth from east to west along the Highway 55 corridor in the
planning periods up to 2030. The area around Loretto within the City of Medina is
identified for development after the current planning period
The Future Land Use Plan objectives for rural development includes the following
statement as Objective #10 for the Rural Service Designation:
"Urban services will not be provided to the Agricultural, Rural Residential, or
Developing Post -2030 land uses during this planning cycle."
This area is intended to be used as an urban reserve area for development in the Post -
2030 period. For properties on septic there is an eventual incentive to connect to sewer
as septic systems require eventual replacement. Not allowing urban services within this
area keeps this additional incentive for redevelopment. If the City's intent is to allow
connections on a limited basis, a policy should be adopted and added to the text of the
plan.
DENSITY CALCULATIONS
Table 5-C on page 5-11 in the Comprehensive Plan illustrates the overall net residential
density for development within the planning period until the year 2030. The City is
planning on providing 3599 units over 1197 net acres. This comes out to a net density of
3.01 units per acre. The Metropolitan Council requires the overall minimum net density
to be 3.0 units per acre.
As developments are approved, the City tracks the density to confirm that the required
net density is being met. The two Enclave projects would have needed a minimum of
245 units to maintain consistency with the net density numbers but came in at 270 units.
This means the City is tracking slightly ahead of its minimum unit count to balance the 3
units per acre. These extra units can be "banked" for projects where the City may wish to
allow a slightly lower density than previously contemplated. This may be helpful in
cases where key natural resources may be threatened by the necessary density.
As mentioned, the subject site is approximately 6 acres in size but is only about 4.8 net
developable acres. This proposal would add 1 unit on 4.8 net acres to the City's density
table. With the extra units included in the two Enclave developments the density is about
3.03 units per acre. With one house, that would be a net loss of 14 units in the density
table, thus offsetting a majority of the extra units afforded to the City with the Enclave
developments. Plus, adding this 4.8 acre parcel would drop the density back down to
about 3.01 units per acre and restrict future flexibility.
STAFF ANALYSIS
There are many cases where property owners who have parcels near the Urban Service
Area wish to connect to the nearest sewer system for various reasons. In many cases, the
site may not have any room for a septic system due to environmental constraints. A city
must weigh the consequences of such a connection, though, as these connections are not
planned for in the tables required to prove density is being maintained as required by the
Metropolitan Council. When a City intends to maintain rural character by keeping
density as low as possible in urban areas this means there is little margin for allowing
unplanned connections. The City must cautiously connect those outside of the urban
service area that are in need as to not create a density issue that would require a density
offset in a manner that is not contemplated by the Comprehensive Plan.
The applicant is seeking to connect to the Loretto sewer system as a means for a cost
effective solution that fits with their future construction plans. While this is
understandable, it does create a precedence that others may wish to follow. If this
property were allowed to connect, the City's density numbers would drop down close to
the originally planned 3.01 and off set over half of the units banked by the two Enclave
developments. If the 8 acre parcel immediately to the north came in for the same request,
the density would drop down to 2.99 units per acre and the City would be out of
compliance. This would result in requiring additional density elsewhere, more so than
what was contemplated when the Comprehensive Plan was adopted.
Connecting a property identified as Agricultural, Rural Residential, and Developing Post -
2030 to urban services is generally inconsistent with the policies of the Comprehensive
Plan. The City may wish to consider in what situations connection to such properties or
similar may be acceptable to make to ensure the all situations are being treated equally
and that the intent of the Comprehensive Plan is being met.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends denial of the request for the following reasons:
1. The Comprehensive Plan does not allow for the provision of urban services to
properties in the Developing Post -2030 Land Use designation.
2. The required offsets from allowing such connections would lead to the City
having to increase densities in other areas.
3. Site constraints and preservation of environmental conditions in areas previously
identified for development within this staging period are more appropriate uses
for offsetting "banked" units.
If the Planning Commission finds that this request is acceptable, any recommendation of
approval shall be made with the following conditions:
1. The City Council should adopt policies regarding allowances for rural properties
to connect to urban services.
2. An inter -governmental utility agreement between the Cities of Medina and
Loretto should be adopted prior to the connection.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Applicant Narrative
2) Letter from Septic Designer
3) Letter from City of Loretto
LOCATION MAP:
Commission Members:
Plan amendment request:
My wife, Virginia, and I have lived In our current Medina home since 2001. Our lot is six acres and
it borders the City of Loretto. (see map) We are in the planning stages of building a new home on
our current lot. We intend on living in our current residence until we can occupy the new
residence and then raze the old residence.
We have been notified that our current septic system is not sized sufficiently to accommodate the
new residence as planned. The septic designer has Indicated to us that due to soil conditions, a
current septic easement and the wetland that bisects the property, they cannot find a suitable site
for the larger proposed system
We request your approval to connect the new home site to the City of Loretto's sewer and water
system at my expense as the applicant.
I have attached a signed statement from the Loretto Public Works Director, Jeff Leuer, indicating
their approval of our request.
-The City of Loretto operates a private system that is not affiliated with the City of Medina's
(Metropolitan Council) system.
-This change will not impact Medina's density numbers. Furthermore, I believe the location of our
property is uniquely situated to take advantage of Loretto's generous offer.
Thank you,
Ned Sorley
WACHHOLZ INC.
100 East Lake Street
Waconia, MN 55387
952-442-9323 - Phone
612-802-2903 - Cell
952-442-1032 - Fax
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT, SYSTEMS
LICENSE NO. 18aWACHHOLZINC.
WAYNE & BETTY WACHHOLZ, DESIGNER II
May 8, 2013
To whom it may concern
Reference: Ned Sorley
4200 Hillview Lane, Loretto, MN 55357
PID 06-118-23-41-0002
Re: Septic System for new home.
On April 27 & 28, 2013, we researched the property at 4200 Hillview Lane for an acceptable
site for a replacement septic treatment area. Soil borings were done to locate undisturbed
soils and measurements were taken on the setbacks. The area around the current building
site is not suitable for a usable septic system.
Sincerely,
Wayrf'e Wachholz
Wachholz Inc
City of
Loretto
279 Medina Street North, Suite 26o • P.O. Box 207 • Loretto, MN 55359
(763) 479-4305 • Fax (763) 4?9-2665
e-matL trostnCQcLloretto.mn.us
www.ci.loretto.mn.us
5/16/2013
City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340
Commission Members:
MAY 1 6 2013
I have reviewed Ned Sorley's request for approval to connect to the City of Loretto's sewer and water systems. Our
system have more than enough capacity and given that Ned is willing to bear the entire expense personally, we are
open to the discussions and see no reason not to proceed forward.
Sincerely,
)'4411
Jell Lever
City of Loretto
Public Works Director
Mayor Kent Koch
Council Members Carl Girk, Henry Pepin, John Neumann, Tom .Pedersen
City Clerk Travis Rosin