Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
07-09-2013
MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, JULY 9, 2013 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL (2052 County Road 24) 1. Call to Order 2. Public Comments on items not on the agenda 3. Update from City Council proceedings 4. Planning Department Report 5. Approval of June 11, 2013 draft Planning Commission minutes. 6. Public Hearing — US Home Corporation - Preliminary Plat for a 9 Single Family Lot Subdivision on 4.6 acres located east of Hunter Drive, north of The Enclave of Medina and south of Comanche Trail (PID#12-118-23-43-0004). 7. Public Hearing — Saints Peter and Paul - Conditional Use Permit to expand the cemetery located at the southeast comer of Hamel Road and County Road 19 (PID# 07-118-23-13-0001). 8. Public Hearing — Dennis Hedtke — Rezoning from Uptown Hamel -2 (UH-2) to Commercial Highway -Railroad (CH -RR) at 3522 Sioux Drive located at the southeast corner of State Hwy 55 and Sioux Drive (PID# 12-118-23-41-0069). 9. Public Hearing - Money Tree Holdings, LLC - Rezoning from Rural Residential -Urban Reserve (RR-UR) to Single Family Residential (R1) zoning district located east of County Road 116 and south of Hackamore Road (PID# 01-118-23-22-0006). 10. Council Meeting Schedule 11. Adjourn POSTED IN CITY HALL JUNE 28, 2013 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Weir and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: June 27, 2013 SUBJ: Planning Department Updates July 2, 2013 City Council Meeting Ordinance Updates A) Subdivision Ordinance - At the City Council's goal setting session, the Council directed staff to conduct a comprehensive review of the subdivision ordinance and prepare necessary amendments. Staff intends to hold off on this ordinance until a number of the land use applications under review have been finalized. Land Use Application Reviews A) Fenske/Cole Variance Request — 2959 Lakeshore Avenue — Sandra Fenske and Randy Cole have requested a variance from the setback from Lake Independence to construct a house addition in the location of an existing deck on their home. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the May 21 meeting, and recommended approval, but only if the applicant reduces hardcover on the property below existing conditions. The City Council reviewed at the June 4 and June 18 meeting and directed staff to prepare a resolution of approval. The resolution will be presented at the July 2 meeting. B) Complete Eye Care Site Plan Review —170 Westfalen Trail — Dr. Wesley has requested a site plan review for the construction of a new building to house Medina Eye Care next to West Financial at Sioux Drive and Highway 55. The Planning Commission reviewed at the June 11 meeting and recommended approval. The City Council will review at the July 2 meeting. C) Sorley Comp Plan Amendment — 4200 Hillview — The property owner has requested a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to add their 6 acre property to the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) so that they can connect to the City of Loretto's sewer system instead of replacing a septic system on their property. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at the June 11 meeting and recommended denial because the provisions of urban services to property guided to Develop Post -2030 is inconsistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and would negatively impact the City's density calculation. The City Council will review at the July 2 meeting. D) Kunin/Anderson Lot Rearrangement and Easement Vacation — 855 Medina Road — the property owners have requested to rearrange lot lines to add two acres of property to 855 Medina Road. The applicant also requests the vacation of drainage and utility easements adjacent to the lot line proposed to be adjusted. Staff intends to present the requests to the City Council at the July 2 meeting. E) Fawn Meadows subdivision — east of CR 116, north of Medina Lake Drive — Money Tree, LLC has requested a preliminary plat and rezoning for the development of the 10 acres (5.72 net acres) immediately north of the Toll Brothers Reserve of Medina project. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and the item will be scheduled for a Public Hearing when complete. F) Enclave at Medina 5'" Addition Preliminary Plat — Lennar has requested preliminary plat approval for a nine -lot subdivision of the 5 acre (-2.5 net acre) "Nolan property" immediately north of the Enclave. These lots would be incorporated into the Enclave neighborhood. Staff is Planning Department Update Page 1 of 3 July 2, 2013 City Council Meeting conducting a preliminary review and the application will be presented to the Planning Commission when complete. G) Woods of Medina Preliminary Plat — Jeff Pederson has requested preliminary plat and rezoning to subdivide 9.5 acres (8.8 net acres) at the intersection of CR116 and Shawnee Woods Road into 16 Rl single family lots. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and the application will be presented to the Planning Commission when complete. H) St. Peter and Paul Cemetery CUP — St. Peter and Paul church intends to expand their cemetery at the southeast corner of County Road 19 and Hamel Road. Improvements include new access drives, landscaping, stormwater improvements and additional grave sites. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and the application will be presented to the Planning Commission when complete. I) 3522 Sioux Drive Rezoning — Dennis Hedtke has requested a rezoning of the property at the southeast corner of Highway 55 and Sioux Drive from the Uptown Hamel -2 zoning district to CH -RR. The property owner is listing the property for sale and believes it would be beneficial for the property to be zoned the same as the Hamel Station development to the west of Sioux Drive. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and the application will be presented to the Planning Commission when complete. J) Fields of Medina 2"d Addition — Mattamy has requested final plat approval of the remaining 21 lots in the Fields of Medina development. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and the application will be presented to the Council when complete. K) The Reserve of Medina Final Plat — The City Council granted preliminary plat approval to Toll Brothers on May 21 for a 126 -lot single-family subdivision on the Gorman Farm property east of County Road 116 and south of Hackamore. The applicant has now requested Final Plat approval for the first phase of the development to include 48 lots. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and the application will be presented to the City Council when complete. L) 345 Clydesdale Easement Vacation — Ryan Companies recently sold the Medina Clydesdale Marketplace development to Wellington Management. As part of this transaction, the buyer requested a storm sewer pipe bisecting one of the vacant building pads to be moved by Ryan Companies. The applicant has submitted a new storm sewer alignment and proposes to vacate the easement which laid over the previous pipe location. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and the application will be presented to the City Council when complete. M) Three Rivers Park/Reimer Lot Rearrangement — the property owners have requested a lot rearrangement to allow a "land swap" of property which the Reimers own on the west side of Homestead Trail and which Three Rivers owns on the east side of Homestead Trail. The applicants do not wish to submit the deposit required by the City, and have not completely filled out the application forms. The item will be presented when complete for review. N) Morrison Lot Split and Variance — Truxtun and Adrienne Morrison have requested to subdivide their 18 acres at 1525 Hunter Drive into two lots. The City Council approved of the division at the June 4 meeting. Staff will work with the applicant to finalize the terms and conditions of the approval. 0) The Enclave at Brockton 3rd Addition — Lennar has requested approval to plat the "detached townhoine" portion of the Enclave at Brockton. The Council approved a resolution at the May 7 meeting. Staff will assist the developer in finalizing the terms and conditions of approval before construction begins P) Fields of Medina West —1" Addn — north of Highway 55, east of Arrowhead — Mattamy Homes applied to final plat 34 of the 64 lots within the subdivision. The Council granted final plat Planning Department Update Page 2 of 3 July 2, 2013 City Council Meeting approval at the April 16 meeting, and staff is working with the developer to finalize the conditions of approval before construction begins. Additional Projects A) City Hall Space Planning — staff coordinated a brainstorming and issue identification session with staff to begin planning for how to use the space available at City Hall when the Police move to their new facility at 600 Clydesdale Trail B) Meeting w/ St Anne's Church re: senior housing — staff took part in a meeting with St. Anne's, a non-profit developer, and a service provider to assist St. Anne's Church while they consider the long-range plan for the property they own across Hamel Road from the church property. Staff learned much about the development of senior housing and assisted living facilities. Planning Department Update Page 3 of 3 July 2, 2013 City Council Meeting b. 1 CITY OF MEDINA 2 PLANNING COMMISSION 3 DRAFT Meeting Minutes 4 Tuesday, June 11, 2013 5 6 1. Ca11 to Order: Commissioner Charles Nolan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 7 8 Present: Planning Commissioners Charles Nolan, Robin Reid, Mark Osmanski, 9 Victoria Reid, and Kent Williams. 10 11 Absent: Commissioners Randy Foote and Robert Mitchell (arrived at 8 p.m.) 12 13 Also Present: City Councilmember Kathleen Martin, City Planner Dusty Finke, and 14 Nate Sparks of NAC. 15 16 2. Public Comments on items not on the agenda 17 No public comments. 18 19 3. Update from City Council proceedings 20 Martin updated the Commission on recent activities and decisions by the City 21 Council. 22 23 4. Planning Department Report 24 Finke provided an update of upcoming Planning projects. 25 26 5. Approval of the May 14, 2013 Draft Planning Commission meeting minutes. 27 Motion by R Reid, seconded by Osmanski, to approve the May 14, 2013 as 28 presented. Motion carried unanimously. (Absent: Foote and Mitchell) 29 30 6,---Meney-T-r-ee-HoldingsrhLE—PID-0-141-8-2342-0006-(east-ef-Geunty-Read41-6i 31 32 . TO 33 BE CONTINUED TO FUTURE DATE 34 35 7. Complete Eye Care of Medina -170 Westfalen Trail (PID 12-118-23-41-0117) - 36 Site Plan Review for construction of new commercial building. 37 38 Finke presented the staff report and stated the applicant proposed a 4400 sq. ft., 2- 39 story building at Hamel Station development at Hwy 55 & Sioux Drive. Overall 40 development of Hamel Station received variances and site plan review approvals in 41 2007, but this is an amendment to that site plan review with additional standards from 42 the current zoning district. 43 44 Finke noted that the site received a variance to exceed 25% hardcover allowed 45 adjacent to Elm Creek, and that staff recommends that the same amount or less 1 4 46 hardcover be considered for this site as shown for the coffee shop on the 2007 47 approval. The proposed building is larger than the coffee shop, but the lack of drive 48 thru and patio seating offsets this difference. Proposed to use existing stormwater 49 improvements from 2007 which City Engineer estimates will meet rate control and 50 nutrient reduction, but not volume control/filtration requirements. Ordinance allows 51 for waiver for plans approved prior to ordinance. The development will be served by 52 a shared drive off of Westfalen which will continue west when property develops, and 53 parking is also proposed to be shared. The subject site is under -parked, which is 54 made up by extra parking on western lot. The applicant proposes to construct some 55 of the parking on the western lot along with the building. Staff recommends cross - 56 easements and maintenance agreements. 57 58 Finke concluded that staff recommends approval with conditions noted in staff report. 59 60 Williams asked if stormwater management could be improved by additional 61 landscaping. Finke stated full volume control would be difficult with the space 62 available but some filtration could be achieved, perhaps within a larger landscaping 63 island in the parking lot. 64 65 Nolan asked how the allowed hardcover is being tracked vs. future construction. 66 Finke said staff measured the approved coffee shop site and compared it to current 67 proposal. Staff does not recommend "borrowing" hardcover from the other lots. 68 Nolan asked why the landscaping was being reduced. Finke stated that the main 69 reduction was plantings which were proposed in the coffee shop patio area. Nolan 70 asked how the applicant was going to reduce the hardcover. Finke responded that 71 that the drive aisles could be reduced to 22 feet in width and the sidewalk could be 72 removed from the east side of the building, since there is an existing sidewalk on the 73 east side of the access drive and also one between the buildings to the west. 74 75 Joe Gearen of Zeller Realty, representing the applicant, stated the building is bigger 76 than the coffee shop but some of the space is 2° level storage. He stated that Dr. 77 Wesley is concerned about parking because the current site does not have enough. 78 79 Dr. Gina Wesley, applicant, said there are two doctors that will be on site and that 80 parking is necessary for both staff and customers. Nolan asked if it is a shared 81 parking situation. Finke stated it was and that the applicant is building some of the 82 parking stalls for the west lot and that an agreement was required for all lots. 83 84 V. Reid asked about aesthetics from Hwy 55, noting that fewer trees were proposed 85 than required by Ordinance. Finke said there are restrictions on the property to the 86 north because of Met Council sewer improvements, but there was more flexibility to 87 the east. There is a fair amount of vegetation on the site and the willows are coming 88 back. 89 2 90 Nolan asked Finke what could be done regarding the landscaping and stormwater 91 improvements. Finke said there is a good possibility to combine both stormwater 92 management concepts and landscaping with the reduction in the drive aisle. 93 94 Williams said that he believes the applicant should provide for filtration in the 95 landscaping. 96 97 Mitchell arrived at 8 pm. 98 99 Approval with conditions in Staff report, and have Staff work with applicant on 100 mitigating stormwater affects through landscaping design from the proposed 101 development consistent with the applicant's desired goal to keep as much parking as 102 possible. 103 104 Motion by Williams, seconded by R. Reid, to recommend approval of the Site 105 Plan Review for the construction of a new commercial building with the 106 conditions noted in the staff report and an additional condition that stormwater 107 filtration be provided, keeping in mind the applicant's desire to keep as much 108 parking as possible. Motion carries (Abstain: Mitchell; Absent: Foote). 109 110 111 8. Ned Sorley — 4200 Hillview Lane (PID 06-118-23-41-0002) — Comprehensive Plan 112 Amendment to extend the Metropolitan Urban Service Area to include property 113 to permit existing lot to connect to municipal sanitary sewer system. 114 115 Sparks presented the request. He noted the property is located in Medina, adjacent to 116 the City of Loretto and the existing home is being demolished to construct a new 117 home on the lot. The owner has requested to connect the new home to Loretto's 118 sewer system, which would require the City of Medina to amend its Comp Plan to 119 include the property within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). He noted 120 that the existing home is served by a septic system which is partially located on the 121 neighboring property within an easement, and that the applicant has stated that there 122 is not a suitable location near the proposed home site to locate a septic system. 123 Sparks stated that indications were that a system could be located on the western 124 portion of the site, but this is a long distance from where the applicant is choosing to 125 construct the home. 126 127 Sparks noted that the acreage of the property would be counted against the City's 128 density calculations, which are at the minimum of 3.0 units/acre. Sparks noted that, 129 when calculating density, the Met Council requires the City to assume that every 130 future development will be at the absolute minimum density, but that some of the 131 developments which have been approved have been slightly above the minimum. 132 This means that the City has a little leeway in terms of density; essentially a "bank" 133 of extra units. However, staff believes the City should have a policy to determine 134 which MUSA expansions are acceptable because it is unlikely that the City could 135 allow all residential properties adjacent to sewer to be included within the MUSA and 3 136 still meet density. He mentioned that the City has expanded sewer service in the past 137 to bail out failing septic systems when there were no practical alternatives to replace 138 the system on the property. However, this is not the case for the current request. 139 140 Osmanski inquired if the applicant has explored the potential to amend the easement 141 to allow for the septic system to be expanded. 142 143 Sparks stated that the applicant did not provide information related to that option. 144 145 Ned Sorely, the applicant, stated that it seemed to him that hooking up to the sewer 146 just makes sense and should be a win -win for everybody. His neighbor could get a 147 septic off his property, Loretto gains a customer, and Medina should be happy to 148 abandon a middle -age septic system. However, after speaking with City staff, he 149 understood the complications to something that makes so much sense. Hooking to 150 the sewer is better for the environment. Sorely stated that he understands the density 151 issue, but the staff report clearly shows that the extra density in the existing 152 development would cover his property being included, and would cover other 153 property as well. 154 155 Sorely noted that if the City did not permit the property to be connected to the sewer 156 system, they would probably re -design the house so that it would be possible to re -use 157 the existing septic system. He stated that they have not priced out a new septic system 158 on the portion of the property which could support a septic system. 159 160 Williams inquired if the density issue could be dealt with by subdividing around the 161 house and putting the rest of the property into a separate lot. Finke said that would be 162 inconsistent with the policies for rural lots. Williams stated that if a MUSA 163 expansion is for the convenience or cost -saving of the property owner, he would not 164 support it. 165 166 Steve Duncan (4155 Chippewa Circle) stated that in 2001 the neighbors were selling 167 their house and they placed the replacement system on their property. He stated they 168 came up with an agreement with the previous owner. The system could remain for 10 169 years, so long as no repairs would need to occur. He said when he saw the notice; he 170 said hip -hip -hooray. It makes sense and is a win -win to hook up to Loretto. He 171 stated that he does not want the septic on his property, they could lose a sale. 172 173 Williams stated that it sounds like they could require the Sorelys to get the septic 174 system off of the property already, regardless of the City's actions. 175 176 Duncan stated that this is true. 177 178 Mitchell stated that he did not believe the request was ready for review. He believed 179 more information related to the septic easement should be provided. He asked if the 180 easement ended after 10 years. 181 4 182 Finke stated that the easement which is of record did not end in 10 years. However, 183 the easement does require the removal of the system when a new one is constructed. 184 185 Mitchell stated that it is troubling to let people hook up contrary to the staging plan. 186 He wondered if the City allowed the property owner to hook up, and should they pay 187 the connection fees for the 15 -units that are expected to occur in the future. He noted 188 that there is not an emergency health concern, and that there are potentially other 189 alternatives which could suffice. 190 191 Nolan noted that he is more cut -and -dry from a policy standpoint. The Comp Plan is 192 supposed to be a strong document and should only be amended if there is an 193 extremely compelling case to do so. He noted that developers always want to put in 194 lower density, and that the "bank" of units might be used to save environmentally 195 sensitive areas. Nolan stated that policies are set in general terms, and that when 196 applied to a specific case, seems like it doesn't make sense. But when you look at 197 precedent and other cases, you have to say "sorry" to the specific. 198 199 R. Reid stated it was a numbers issue, and she is hesitate to open the door because 200 there will almost certainly be others. She noted that this was a very logical thing to 201 request, but the math doesn't let the City approve of the MUSA expansion. 202 203 V. Reid noted that she does feel bad, because she understands why it looks like it 204 makes so much sense. 205 206 Motion by Mitchell, seconded by Osmanski, to recommend denial of the 207 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to extend the Metropolitan Urban Service 208 Area upon the findings that: 1) the Comp Plan does not allow for the provision 209 of urban services in the Development Post -2030 land use designation; and 2) the 210 required offset of density is not in the public interest and could negatively 211 impact the City's ability to meet its density requirements while serving other 212 objectives such as natural resource preservation. Motion carries unanimously 213 (Absent: Foote). 214 215 10. Council Meeting Schedule 216 Victoria Reid agreed to attend and present at the June 18th, 2013 Council meeting. 217 218 11 Adjourn 219 Motion by R. Reid, seconded by V. Reid, to adjourn at 8:58 p.m. Motion carried 220 unanimously. (Absent:) 5 AGENDA ITEM: 6 NOIVIttliWit4T 4101.4.0CIATIO Cat.$1bk!AteUt$., MU1C. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231 .2561 planners@nacplanning.corr PLANNING REPORT TO: Medina Planning Commission Scott Johnson, City Administrator FROM: Nate Sparks DATE: July 1, 2013 RE: Medina — Enclave at Medina 5th Addition Preliminary Plat CITY FILE: L-13-114 Application Date: June 12, 2013 Review Deadline: August 11, 2013 BACKGROUND / SUMMARY OF REQUEST US Home Corporation and Nolan Brothers, Inc. have requested a Preliminary Plat for a residential subdivision on 4.45 acres on Hunter Drive north of the Enclave at Medina subdivision. The site is currently zoned R-2, Two -Family Residential. The preliminary plat is proposed to include 9 single family houses. SUBJECT SITE The property is currently vacant and sits at the terminus of two cul-de-sacs. To the northeast is Comanche Trail and to the south is Butternut Drive. The property was split from the property preliminary platted as Enclave at Medina in 2011. At that time it was rezoned to R-2 which allows for smaller lot single family residential and duplexes and is intended to implement the Medium Density Residential land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan. At the time of the lot split, a portion of this property was dedicated as right-of-way for Hunter Drive by easement which reduced the site from 4.63 to 4.45 acres. In property records it still is depicted as having 4.63 because the right-of-way was dedicated by easement rather than plat. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONING The property is guided Medium Density Residential and requires a minimum net density of 3.5 units per acre. The total area of the subject site, after the removal of the area dedicated for Hunter Drive, is 4.45 acres. There is a total of 1.88 acres of wetland and 0.22 acres of wetland buffer in the plat. Therefore, the net acreage of the site is 2.35 acres. Multiplying the 2.35 acres by 3.5 units per acre would result in a minimum of 8.225 units. The applicant is proposing 9, which meets this requirement. PRELIMINARY PLAT & LOT STANDARDS The proposed preliminary plat includes 9 single family lots, one outlot, and the dedication of right-of-way. The lots range in size from 8,560 square feet to 15,462 square feet, with the majority being between 8,000 and 10,000 square feet. The outlot is largely for a wetland and buffer area on the eastern half of the site. The following dimensional standards apply to single-family residential lots within the R2 zoning district: R2 Requirement Proposed Minimum Lot Size (single-family) 8,000 square feet 8,560 to 15,462 square feet Minimum Lot Width 60 feet 65 feet Minimum Lot Depth 90 feet 110 feet Front Yard Setback 25 feet 25 feet Front Yard Setback (garage) 30 feet 30 feet Side Yard Setback (combined) 15 feet (10 & 5) 15 feet (10 & 5) Side Yard (corner) 25 feet 25 feet Rear Yard Setback 25 feet 25 feet Rear Yard Setback (to Hunter Dr) 35 feet 35 feet Upland Wetland Buffer Setback 15 feet 15 feet Max. Hardcover 50% 50% It should be noted that to the rear of many of the lots there will be extremely limited space for appurtenances like decks as the houses are set almost to the upland buffer or Hunter Drive right- of-way setbacks. TRANSPORTATION Streets The applicant proposes to construct a continuation of Butternut Drive within a 50 foot wide right-of-way to the north from the Enclave at Medina development terminating in a cul-de-sac. The proposed cul-de-sac is the City's standard detail plate with a 64 foot wide radius. Due to the density of the development, however, this creates a situation where there is very limited right-of- way available for snow storage with the number and spacing of driveways. City Staff would recommend an alternative cul-de-sac design to take this into consideration and possibly adjusting some driveway locations to create more space for snow storage. Having a cul-de-sac instead of an access out to Hunter Drive is seen as acceptable, as it is limiting the number of access points on to a collector road. Connecting Butternut Drive to Comanche Trail is possible but it may require the development to lose a lot creating a problem meeting density,the road would lie partially within a wetland buffer, and connecting to the existing neighborhood may not be desirable for existing property owners. There currently is a temporary cul-de-sac on the northern end of Butternut Drive in the Enclave at Medina development that will need to be removed. Trails & Sidewalks The applicant proposes a sidewalk on one side of Butternut Drive that ends when the cul-de-sac begins. Based on the final cul-de-sac design there may be availability for a sidewalk to continue 2 within the cul-de-sac. There already is a trail along Hunter Drive adjacent to this property. The City may want to consider a connection between the sidewalk and the trail. UTILITIES Sewer & Water The applicant proposed to bring sewer and water from Enclave at Medina to the south. Stormwater Management The stormwater for this site is being handled by the improvements within the development to the south. These improvements were designed to handle the subject site and to meet the City's stormwater management regulations. This property will require to either be placed in the stormwater taxing district for the Enclave at Medina development. WATER RESOURCES Wetlands There is 1.88 acres of wetland in the eastern portion of the proposed plat. The applicant has identified an upland buffer generally consistent with City regulations. An upland buffer planting plan is required. The buffer plantings shall also be required in the southeastern portion of the outlot. Irrigation Lawn and landscape irrigation systems are not permitted to be connected to the City water supply in any new development. The applicant will need to provide an alternative irrigation system utilizing water from the stormwater ponds and perhaps supplemented by private wells. The design of this system will need to be approved by the City Engineer. LANDSCAPING & TREE PRESERVATION Tree Preservation There are 983.4 inches of significant trees on the property. Most all of these trees are located within the wetland area. The applicant is proposing no tree removal on the project. Buffer Yards The ordinance requires buffer yards as a way to establish transitions between uses and developments of differing densities. In this case a buffer yard with an opacity of 0.3 is required along Hunter Drive. The applicant has provided this buffer. A buffer of an opacity of 0.2 is also required along the north property line, as this area is zoned UR. Landscaping The ordinance requires two trees to be planted on each single family lot, one of which is required to be located in the front yard. As proposed, the landscaping plan meets these minimum requirements. Additionally, there are portions of the proposed outlot that are not wetlands or buffers. It is recommended that these areas are also landscaped in such a fashion to not require maintenance. 3 The area in the northwest corner of the outlot would not be able to be accessed without going through Lot 6 or Comanche Trail. PARK DEDICATION There are no park and trail plan components identified on this parcel. Therefore, it would appear that cash -in -lieu of parkland dedication would be appropriate. The cash -in -lieu amount is based on 8% of the value of the land with the minimum cash contribution being $3,500 per dwelling unit and the maximum at $8,000 per dwelling unit. In this case, the value would max out and the fee would be $8,000 per lot. The Park Commission will review this proposal at a future meeting and give the Council a formal recommendation. APPLICATION REVIEW The subdivision regulations state that the Planning Commission and City Council shall deny approval of a plat based on one or a combination of the following findings: (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city, or that the proposed subdivision is premature, as defined in Section 820.28. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. If the City does not make these findings, and the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, City ordinances, and other City policies, the preliminary plat should be approved. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat with the conditions noted below: 1) The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include the conditions described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy. 2) The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans received by the City on June 7, 2013. The design of all improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing construction. 3) The Applicant shall provide a letter of credit prior to any site construction in an amount recommended by the City Engineer to ensure completion of the improvements identified in the approved plans. 4 r 4) Prior to final plat approval, the Applicant shall provide detailed construction plans for review by the City Engineer. 5) The Applicant shall provide park dedication in an amount determined by the City Council following recommendation by the Park Commission. 6) No lawn or landscape irrigation systems shall be permitted to be connect to the City water system. The Applicant shall provide details of alternative measures prior to final plat approval. 7) The applicant shall redesign the cul-de-sac in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer and Public Works Director. 8) The temporary cul-de-sac on Butternut Drive south of the subject property shall be removed. 9) A buffer yard with a 0.2 opacity should be placed on the northern property line of the subject site. 10) The property shall be placed within a stormwater taxing district. 11) An upland buffer planting plan is required. 12) A tree replacement plan is required. 13) All comments of the City Engineer shall be addressed. 14) All comments of the City Attorney shall be addressed, and the Applicant shall abide by the City Attorney's recommendations related to title issues and recording procedures. 15) The Applicant shall provide Homeowner's Association documents for City review. This document shall describe responsibilities for maintenance of stormwater improvements, buffer yards, and lawn irrigation systems. 16) The Applicant shall obtain necessary approvals and permits from the Elm Creek Watershed, Hennepin County, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Metropolitan Council, and other relevant agencies. 17) The application for final plat shall be submitted to the City within 180 days of preliminary approval or the preliminary plat shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council. 18) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, construction plans, and other relevant documents. Exhibits: 1. City Engineer's Report(s) 2. Applicant's Plan Set 5 WSB & .4ssaeiares, Inc. June 20, 2013 engineering• planning• environmental. construction Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: City Project: Enclave at Medina 5th Addition, LR-13-114 WSB Project No. 2065-580 Dear Dusty: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the site plan dated June 6, 2013, for the proposed Enclave at Medina 5th Addition. The plans propose to extend utilities and Butternut Drive northerly from the Enclave at Medina 1st Addition to serve 9 new single family parcels. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters. 1. The proposed cul-de-sac is 120' in diameter and meets the standards shown in City Standard Detail STR-08. The cul-de-sac takes up almost all of the right-of-way and creates an excessive amount of hardcover. The City should consider allowing the cul-de-sac with a 45' radius to reduce hardcover and be consistent with other cul-de-sacs constructed in town and in most other communities. 2. Cleanouts for the proposed sump draintile collection system should be located in green spaces and not in proposed driveway locations. 3. Storm sewer calculations should be provided. 4. Pond A was sized to serve this parcel when it is fully developed. The stormwater design standards have changed slightly since the construction of Pond A. At the time Pond A was constructed the pond was designed to filtrate 0.5" over the entire site. The volume requirements today require filtrating 1.5" over the new impervious surfaces. Filtrating 0.5" over the entire site exceeds today's standards and therefore no additional stormwater improvements are necessary to serve this development. 5. The City should consider having the plans revised to show relocating the existing Hydrant #3 to the west or sidewalk side of Butternut Drive. 6. CBMH 2 should include a 4' sump. 7. The City does not allow irrigation from the municipal water system. Future submittals should identify how water will be supplied for irrigation. St. Cloud • Minneapolis • St. Paul Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com Cr lUsersleewmsDed:mplEnelnoe at Medina 5,h .4ddition 06>013.doc Enclave at Medina 5th Addition June 20, 2013 Page 2 Please contact me at 612-209-5113 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. 2;e1 Tom Kellogg srb C lUsersieer<mvDeskmp,Endare a+Afedina 5dh.4dditlan 062013.doo METRO WEST INSPECTION SERVICES, INC. Loren Kohnen, Fres. June 19, 2013 TO: Debra Peterson Planning Assistant FROM: Loren Kohnen RE: Enclave 5th Addition PRELIMINARY PLAT - 9 LOT SUBDIVISION (763) 4794 720 FAX (763) 479-3090 Mtrowst76@aol.com 1) The center island and the small cul-de-sac must be approved by Public Works. 2) There are seven (7) driveways coming into the cul-de-sac. There will be no room to park cars. Snow removal will be a nightmare and the center island does not help. 3) Fire trucks will have problems maneuvering and setting up. LK:jg Box 248, Loretto, Minnesota 55357 SITE ADD RESS 80 Address Una ssign ed, Medin a, MN A j 14,014 sq. ft. y7 kk rif i( .7 / 3 1( b : 8560sq. ft. 11 "110.84.. _. . 1.� r I Z l 8,962 sq. ft. w. .x._. . _.. ---1 150, 66 I 1 110,011 sq. ft. t I 151. 66 O rn EX ISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRA CTO R SHALL DETERM INE THE EXA CT ATIO N OF ANY ANC A LL % STING ,IL IDES BEFORE COM M ICING WORK. HE AG REES TO RE FULLY RESP OWIRI F FO R ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OU T OF H IS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOC ATE ANO PR ESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTIN G UTILITIES. S89°51'41.W 647.66 113. 111 614.66 I 150.05 I 9 10,021 s q. ft.! 150.2 258 12 '. 589°51'41'E 643.95 (6 O 5 • 4 iP OND C 1 t ar ..---" ( rnvl '004,0 J 174,1 %005 /� 3 \ 1 0 i \-I 1 O1 M h 0 0 I —T 1 9 ito DESCRIPTION OF SU BJECT PROPERTY That part of Lot 13, AUDITOR'S SU BDIVISION NO. 241, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the north line of Lot 13, distant 524. 35 feet we st from the point of interse ction of said north lin e with the west line of Lo t 14 as measured a long said north line; then ce south parallel with the we st line of Lot 14, 0 distanc e of 328.18 feet; thence west parallel with the nonh line of Lot 13, a distance 0066165 feet, mo re or less, to a po int on the west line of Lut 13; then ce nor th alo ng the west line of said Lot 13. a distance of 328.18 feet to the n orthwest comer of Lot 13; thence east alon g the north line of Lot 13 to the poin t of beginning. NOTES This su rvey doe s not purport to sho w all u nde rgroun d u tilities. The so urce of information fro m plans and markings will be combined with observed evidence of utilities to develop a v iew of those undergroun d utilities. Howev er, lacking excavation, the exact lo cation of underground features cannot be accur ately, co mple tely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed in formatio n is required, the client is advised that excavatio n may be n ecessary. The contracto r shall deter mine the exact location of any and all existing utilities before commencin g work. The contractor shall be fully respo nsible for any and all damages arising out of his failure to exactly loc ate and pro tect all existing utility facilities. Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 651-454-0002 fo r precise onsite locatio n of u tilities prior to any excavation. Commercial Partn ers Title, LLC as agent for Old Republic Natio nal Title In surance Co mpany Commitme nt for Tide I ns urance File No. 33569, effective date October 19, 2010, was relied upon as to matters of record. The subject pro perty appea rs to lie within Zone X, (area of areas ou tside the I -percent annual chance fl oodplain, areas of 1% a nnual chance sheet flow flooding where average depths are less than 1 foot, areas of I% annual chance stream floodi ng where the contrib uting drainage area is less tha n 1 sq uare mile, or areas protected fro m the I% ann ual chan ce floo d by levees. No Base Flood Elevatio ns or depths are shown withi n this zone. Insura nce purchase is not required in these zones. ), per the Nation al Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insura nce R ate Map Community Panel No. 27053C0167E , dated Septembe r 2, 2004 as acquired from the Federa l Emergency Management Agency Web Site. Area Informatio n : 211,862 Sq. Ft. - 4.864 Acres -- Gross Ar ea 10.827 Sq. Ft. - 0. 249 Acres — Right -of -Way 201,035 Sq. Ft. - 4. 615 A cres —N et Ares Survey coordinate and bearin g basis : Hennepin Coun ty Benchmark: GSID Station 610305 — Mn/DOT Name: 2722 Y — Northwest c omer of Highway No . 55 and Highway No. 101 in Medina . Elevation = 979. 67 (NAV D) TITLE COMMITMENT N OTES: Parcel subject to easement for electrical t ransmissi on (i nc. in favor of Wright -Hennepin Cooperative Electric Asso ciatio n, as created in document dated October 12, 1982, fil ed N ovember 10, 1982, as Document No 4752492. (Shown hereon) VICINITY MAP NO SCALE NO RTH 50 25 0 25 50 100 ■.■■I SC ALE IN FEET LOT TABULATION LOT AREA (S.F) 1 10,011 2 8,962 3 8,560 4 14,014 5 10,511 6 15,462 7 9,861 8 9,394 9 10,021 CLIENT/DEVEL OPER LENNAR 16305 36th Ave N. Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 Att n: Jo e J abl onski T-952-249-3014 Attn: J ason Biederwolf C-612-490-2115 Att n: C ar ol e T ooh ey T-952-249-3012 LAND SURVEYOR/CIVIL EN GINEER SATHRE-BERGQUIST INC. 150 S. Broadway Ave. W ayzata, MN 55391 Attn: R obert M olst ed - Engineer Alin: D avid P emb erton - Land Surveyor T-952-476-6000 F-952-476-0104 Proposed Zoning - R2 Min Width - 60 ft Min Area - 8,000 sf Fysb-30ft Sysb-15 ft Total -5ft Min Rysb-25ft 50' Row - 28' B -B Str eets DESIGNER NO. BY DATE REVISIONS XXX DRAWN BY ERJ CHECKED BY DM8 DATE 06/05/13 USE (INCLUDING COPYIN G, DISTRIBUTION, AND /OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATIO N) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHO UT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 's EXPRESS WR ITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPON SIBILITY. SATH RE-BERGQ UIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIM ATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPO NSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEG ITM ATE USE. I hereby certify that this survey , plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct sup isi on and th ktt I am a duly Licensed Land Survey or under the laws of the Star of Sti nneso6\ Dated this 5th 1(ek ofJu ne, 20 3.\ a Da vid B. Pemberto n. Professional olfessionaal Land Surveyor� Mi nnesota Lice nse No. 40344 so RL SATHRE—BERGQUIST, INC. c 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 s �et° c�FRS P `P�? CITY PROJECT NO. MEDINA, MINNESOTA PRELI MINARY PLAT OF THE ENCLAVE AT MEDINA 5TH ADDTION FILE N O. 5401-659 200 100 0 100 200 400 SCALE IN FEET 1' EXISTING U TILITIES SHOWN ARE SHO WN IN AN PEROX IM ATE W AY ONLY. THE CONT RACT OR SINLL OFTERMIIE THE EXA CT LO CATIO N OF AN Y AIO AL EX ISTIN G UTILITIES BEFOR E CO IAMENCING WO RK. HE AGREES TO BE FILLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAM AG ES ARISING OU T OF HIS FAILU RE TO EXACTLY LO CA TE AND PRE SERVE ANY AND A LL EXISTIN G UTILITIES. J L _ ' —tlj 1 i I HJ.rflR i, Ili + I II FARMS 1 _�:DD�IOP: 1 (NP'LA *'i ED REGINA ESTATES ( •-u.Nrv, l 1 ED TLICKBORCUGH r 1T -Ire 1 1 FARMS pS DESIGNER NO. BY DATE REVISIO NS XXX DRAWN BY ER J CHECKED BY RSM DATE USE (INCLUDING CO PYING, DISTRIBUTION, A ND/OR CO NVEYANCE OF INFORM ATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC:s EXPRESS WRITTEN AU THORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CON STITUTES AN ILLEGITIM ATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATH RE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL R ESPO NSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY R ESPO NSIBLE FO R DAMAGES OR LO SSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMA TE USE. I HER EBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATIO N WAS PR EPA RED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REG ISTERED PRO FESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF M INNESO TA. ROBER T 5. OLSTA D, P. E. Date : OWO(.//3 Lis. No. I -p -r E�aG s sc hFRs , P'S N SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZ ATA, MN . 55391 (952) 476-6000 CIT Y PROJECT NO . MEDINA, MINNESOTA EXISTING CONDITIONS THE ENCLAVE AT MEDINA LENNAR FILE NO. 5401-659 EX EX 06/06/13 \ A -4 r L. . L. i EXISTING UT ILITIES SHOWN AR E SHOWN IN AN APPRO XIM ATE WAY O NLY. THE CONTRACTOR SH ALL OETERM IrE TIE EXACT LOCATIO N OF ANY AND ALL EXISTIN G LIT!! ITIES BEFORE COMM LACING WORK. HE AGR EES TO BE FU LLY RESPONS IBLE FO RA M' ATM ALL DAM AGES ARISING OU T OF HIS FAILUR E TO EXA CTLY LO CATE AND PRESERV E A NY AND ALL EXISTING UTILTNES. DESIGNER NO. BY DA TE REVISIO NS nit ttCC or for if 4U011011 Rt/t l41 S89°51'41"W 647 .66 a. T • w: ,:• ♦ • • • • IteWaier , * i I • • w ♦ • • �r e• • • ♦WEr.TLA w • • • •rwfll7"L • w * SlavW •j w`"• • * • v' • 00° * t `•t. y"� r K LN1i LOT A1RI/0-- J 514.1 m O1°29'39' W 328. Tr i-I BMW T NORTH 50 25 0 25 50 100 ••••i SCALE IN FEET Tot al Tre e # Tre e Species Condition Cal. inc. 153 Elm, Siberian Good 24 .0 154 Elm, Siberian Fair 21.0 155 Boxeld er Fair 14.0 156 Oak, bur Good 12.5 157 Boxelder Good 12.0 158 Boxelder Good 9.0 159 Boxelder Go od 9.0 160 Ash, green Good 16.0 161 Elm, American Good 8.0 162 Willow Good 55.0 163 Elm, Am eric an G ood 8.5 164 Ash, green Good 9.0 165 Ash, green Good 9,5 166 Ash, green Good 13.5 167 Will ow Fair 11.0 168 Ash, green Good 8.0 169 Ash, green Good 13 .0 170 Ash, green G ood 11.5 171 Maple, siher Fair 30 .0 172 Cottonwood Good 40 .0 173 Ash, green Fair 35.0 174 Ash, green Poor 16.5 175 Cott onwood Good 35 .0 176 Ash, green Good 11 .5 177 Willow ,Good 33.0 178 Boxelder Fair 20.5 179 Boxelder Fair 13 .0 180 Willow Fair 19 .5 181 Ash, green Good 8.0 182 Ash, green Good 13.0 183 Ash, gree n G ood 14.5 184 Ash, gree n Good 11 .5 185 Ash, green Fair 12.0 186 Elm, American Fair 9.0 187 Ash, gre en Good 9.5 188 Boxelder Good 11.5 189 Willow Fair 13 .0 190 Ash, green Fair 8.5 191 Willow Good 12.0 192 Willow Good 15.0. 193 Willow Poor 20.0 194 Ash, green Good 10.0 195 Ash, gr een Good 13.5 196 Ash, green Good 8.5 197 Ash, green Good 12 .0 • 198 Ash, green Good 12 .9 199 Ash, gr een Good 11.5 200 Ash, green Good 12.0 201 Ash, green Good 16.5 202 Ash, green Good 8 .5 203 Cott onw ood Fair 40.0 204 Cottonwood Fair 41.0 205 Willow Fair 10 .5 206 Ash, green Good 9.0 207 Ash, green G ood 8.0 208 Ash, green Good 17.0 209 Willow Fair 9 .5 210 Willow Good 10.0 211 Cottonwood Good 28.0 212 Ash, green Fair 15.0 213 Oak, bur Good 14 .0 OUr ..iIL I Cr.l I,: (;: l Total Caliper Inches 983 .4 Exempt Caliper Inches 0 .0 N et Caliper Inches 983.4 50% of Net 491.7 Caliper Inches Removed 0.0 Removal Perce nt age 0 .00% C8I 166Tss XXX DRAWN BY ERJ CHECKED BY RSM DATE USE (INCLUDING CO PYING, DISTRIBUTION , AND/O R CONVEY ANCE OF INFO RM ATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQU IST, INC: s EXPR ESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHO RIZATION CO NSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMA TE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FO R DAM AGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITM ATE USE. I HEREBY CER TIFY THA T THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATIO N WAS PREPAR ED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERV ISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSION AL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STA TE OF M INNESO TA. R-44 S hil�� RO BERT S. OLS AD, P.E. Date: OI. 04 /11 Lic. No SEEPS sR SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC . 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZAT A, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 O �FR S P ` 's CITY PROJECT NO. MEDINA, MINNESOTA TREE SURVEY THE ENCLA VE AT MEDINA 5TH ADDITION LENNAR FILE NO . 5401-659 TS TS 06/06/13 REVISIONS BYE 0 0 Nolan Additio n Bu ffer Planting Schedule KEY CO MM ON NAME BOTANICAL NAM E IITY SIZE NO TES Tree s AM Auatmn Blaze Maple Ac e r haema rw 'Jeffo a 1 2.5 BB Straight single leader RM Red Maple Ace , n or m 2 2. 5 BB Straight sago leader Evergreen Trees BH Black Hills Spruce Picea glauca dersa ta 7 8' BB NS Norway Spruce Picea abuts 6 6' BB Understory PC Profusion Crab Ma kks 'Profusio n' 5 Y B8 Straight eagle leader Shrubs BC Blac k Chokebeny Amnia meharacarpa elata 3 36• M Plante O.C . FM Me adowlark Forsythia Fo rsythia r 'Meadoalarl' 6 36' ht Plan t T O .C . LAURIERS FIRST Nolan Addition Lot Tree Planting Schedule KEY COM MON NAME BOTANICAL NAME ;ITT SIZE NOTES Trees AL Re dmond Lin den Tina americans R edmo nd' 4 2.5 B8 Straight sire leader HL Skyline Honey Locust Gledtsie tnacam nos VW 6 em0s SkAcre' 3 2.5 BB Str aight single leader PE Princton Elm Uknus amencana Princeto n 3 2.5 BB Str aight single leader RM Red Maple Acer ru bnrn 5 2.5 BB Str aight singl e leader RO Re d Oak Ouercu s ruble 3 2.5 BB Str aight singl e leader POND G rwl 1004,0 hw110 05, Planting Point Requir ement .3 Opacity 276 points p er 100' 25 foot Buffer Width 328 Total Feet of Buffer Point Requirment = 906 Points Type Point Val ue Qty P oints Overstory Tree 50 3 150 T all Evergreen 50 13 650 Understory Tree 15 5 75 Tall Shrub 5 9 45 Total 40 20 0 20 40 80 SCALE IN FEET 920 I hereby certify that this plan, atlfI cation or report was prepared by me or under boot sup ervision and that lam a duly registered o cap e Archit ect und er the laws of Ne tof Minn esot a. signed: n• -- r Date: ft -6_01 Registr ation th 20144 0 U �--+ CA MI r --H U O CA 1.4 CA U023 � U 100 East Second Street, Chaska, MN 55318 / (952)361-0644 NOLAN ADDITION BUFFER YARD & LOT TREE PLANTING PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . J DRAWN TDW CHECKED TDW DATE 6/6/2013 SCALE AS SH OWN J OB N O. 5401-634 FILE: N OLAN ADD. BUFFER PLANTING SHEET BP -1 BP -1 \OF SHEET L 699-L0tS 'O N 3113 HVNN3l NOIwIaa`d H15 VNIa3IN 1`d 3A`d1ON3 3141 NV1d 1332:11S 1VNId ` IOS3NNIW `vNIa3W ON 10 3r08d A113 00099 L41Z56) L6E69' NW 'VIVZAVM AV/AO/0 89 H1nOS 050 'ONI 1SIf1Oo2l2 -31HIVS o bn5 1-1,6%'Z„ ON 011 C/ /O/io :+4+3 ' 3'd'0 1S1019 'S 103908 ;% S r1'"? 'VIOS3NNIIN dO 31V1S 30110 SMV1 30183093 8 33NIDN3 1VNOISS3d08 d 0383101030 Aln0 6 96 11VH1 ONV NOISIA83dnS 13 3810 AW 83ONn 80 31,11E1 038 Vd38 d SV M NOI1V 31d133dS 80 N6ld SIHI 104-11 A311833 A 838 3H I '3Sn 31Vw11031111N0 8A 091113538 03000 1 80 S3061(460 80d 3191SNod53a 1116031 Ala6d 00 a3sn 3164911103111 ANV OIOH 01111010 3141 S3A83S38 'ONI'1SI000838-38H1VS 'A1111HISNOdS38116 AO 'ONI '1SI000830-38H1VS AJININ30NI 183030111600 ONV 3Sn 31VINI110 3111 NV S31n111SNO 3 NOIIVZI80H111V 0165 1n0H11M 3Sn ' NOIIV ZI80 Hln6 N311I8M SS38dX3 5.3N1'1S1n00 838-38H1VS in0H1IM 031181H08d A113181S SI 13n008d SIH. AO (NOILVW80 dNl AO 3ONVA 3AN0 3 80 /O N6 'N0 11nelalsl0 'ONIAd0 3 ONIOn1ONI) 3Sn El/90/90 316 0 1990 18 03)13303 r83 A9 NMV80 xxx SNOISIA 38 3160 A8 ON 03N01030 00+9 00+9 00+ 9 00+ 9 00+6 91'09+6 00966 ASV HAIYQ 0001 0101 OZ01 w'auul dOne 0 V :SOA8 OA 0000'091 95'99=N 69'E =' 0'0 60' 900 L = A313 IAd 0L+ 9 = 0 .06 Ind EZ' 9L+ S = 01S 1NI0d M01 91' 9001 = A]131NIOd M01 m n L9' 6001 :3 JAB 6 � 1 0 0 0 , cl OS' LE+ L :SORB m L. OA .0000'09 -+ 90'99 =51 RO'9. =' 0'V 090104 = A313 IAd 01+ 9= 01S IAd 3Al2:Ia 1nNialln9 05 71+9 ,SOA3 'S3LLIl1, OM,. 11V ONV ANY 3,N353N3 cm 3.00 1,10.3 013/3011113 SIH 30 NO ONISItlY 5306 WVO 11V OW AN Y 503315.63]Ir35 A111335015330•J V 0+ 311,INO MO NION W 53111113f 0 N115'I%311V ONV ANV AO 9 011 60 0] 106X3 3111311WM313011YHS 110106/31900 311 ' 01110 AVM 316491%0.3. NV NI NM OHS 3HV NMOHS 5311111, 0N115IX3 m v� \ o RIGHT OF WAY A. EMENT PER DOC. NO. 4752492 N N v W (1008.6) S5L0t 1-X080 / o 0 M„1.17, LS 069S 1339 NI 3163S pose■ 09 OE Sl 0 St OE 2 9 !»v JJ 'VU :Of: 0. 3 woo.. 33 999.3 9&7 RIP II /5.3%1 EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIM ATE WAY O M, TIE C ONTR ACTO R SHALL DETERM INE THE EXACT I°CA TION OF A NY AND A ll XISTING UTILITIES B EFORE COMM HANG WO RK. HE AGR EES TO BE FULLY RESPoNSIBL E FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAG ES ARISING OU T OF MS FAILUR E TO EXAC TLY LO CATE A ND PRESERVE ANY AND A LL EXISTING UTSITES. ° ,.114.6)__ C0 .� x_. (101 . 6' CONCRE WA LK (tyr.) Remove Temp CDS TA: 8+ 92 00 . FFSET• V m Fed Ra mp 0101 . 83 1014.0 x x10110 o �1'a1"E 643. 9 `.S 1013.0 x i '10f7rI W 2. 4 NI,AL 1-17 W PIP W '6 2. 16' W AIL W W W NL W 22 1-15* `I' slo W 1y.:.. 4, 9. l, -y 1-12 NI, 4. W W W 12.1 W ' W '4, ...,..- 1-11 .1011. 9 1-1tY .... .. ,se. ,.../ ' NET 3 1011.9 - -WET-1-9- - - Tom ) PRECAST WHEATS 6EU OREO. PRECAST IMNRr9w: E v2 11 auR E. FTA T PIP - T N 95 I DOWIOtSW, E SUMO _.. .__Ir._ IBM. RIP . PUFF MD ELF SEA LING -CO VER 4R EQ. WON 2 CONCEA LED NOI seam / Molts / MCN E510E OkTAIIS M2MA MOF 2 um WUD RM UP S CB NaRE b0ISIMENT RINGS W ITH WILL DO , M ORTAR BETW EEN EACH. 1 RING WIT .170 REDO , MORTAR .0. 7. wEGG K'ATM SH ILL BE POW PORTLA ND SPE.Q OR . AP PR OVED EQUAL AN IT RML TOP MAT / (RNOCR wwera OR APPROK D ECM.) SSW. E INSTALLED WO. A WROW O RATER PROOF CANU AMMA N 1%RR N1 INFESKELD al APPRO VE, EQUAL SNAIL E MULLED MOUND THE CASTINGMO RIGS ARO O AR COM E \. SECTION (r N ee PAN T OJT RO L FROM 061 4016 WITH E£R6C0TTPE COIALR 10511 0R EQLN6 PRECAST r -IN WO INTEGRAL WE•H1A 4 MEDINA M OON 0.0661 SOPS. M EP.M EP.011 50.21. EQUAL. WON Ua wn.ALIWNM BMW A PPL0vWHOLE STEPS 9 WL Tl10E SLAM BO TART META WOOL PORTEDN OF CON E 6 FACING DOWNSTREAM. ALL WA DS IN MAN.. , TO N INE V AM RAW ER GARETS �LAE KWIC. 6007 DR RILLIL PRN*01omen FOR EAM MOW o..t INTERIOR wt. REM EWMM. ECa ASS LY OF W wINE AOUR+N Awn6E.ORASO IY IS I0. REQUIRED, EE EEan un ox s roaMmE DEEArts moue BLA6 60070X,6 mow s*. r FO R 1S DEM. 0.116,1E TM00[ S5 P FONMN OF O EM D ERIVE MM HY, Ake RIONfOR L W 1.rYE -1R'U FBI. M. MUM IAN. ball SANITARY SEW ER DROP INLET MANHOLE mon o M4A A. DU CO INC mAaLESO -- * POW. FOP ME AID ENDS SHAD . CONSIST O A MINIMUM CP.5C Y. OF /iDREGATE (MOOT MK NORTH ERO AND RISER 9 .1 E FIAEO ON VIRGIN maNDOR 0MCTED STAI6MNG AGGREGATE (MOOT 3119.2 0 SAN NOTE WOM B OW SANITAR Y WO N 6DEEPR TARN SAS, WRY. RISERS SW, E WOWED 30 15 0 15 30 60 OMEN III SCALE IN FEET SERVICE RISER S.0 D OA TRACER WAL E TO MY S*AcT WEAL ONE CONTINUOUS Rai. No SPLICE S -HYDRANT FLAG lotak floceR M. Tar 1 W ATEROI6 PINCER • I / Wee >230ro CONN EC T TRAM DARE TO NOV/HY DRANTwM ON R MINIM (OE AR WRING ) SN O{OLL TO E TAMED. \.l2 CHUM MD ARID STRARO NPPER IRKED WIRE TO E N SI(Y UI• PIC H ON WORD I' R RE. I 0®C YA R61 Y7 050 CRo9 RO M 1E0 RO COVER WOOL LA YERS POLYEIHYLEte WRAP. "r 0680 1E KOCR TO ALL FITTINGS WITH EIS OF TWO.3/4• DIAM ETER ROCS (STA 4 STEEL 0R EPDXY 06104), 00 WON E4P.UCd NOM GROUNDWATER D PE0L 5DRED W ENENA WORMER ARE INSTM®M AR AEAS 1 WIT 1X0.1 GRONOW A11TER UM, AS OETERMEO BY DEWATERM REQUIRPMEN TS61.11wans W D TH E art ENGINEER TE IRON NO.. A WL. E PANT® SW[ FOR ALL TrOAPPD S WITH PLLOGIO MAP NOTES. 1 ALL DMTIE IRON WATdNMNF MUS SPE. E & WON ROMO POD MATO MD FaYw A6FED(ALL mainTAPO2 NYNU NTS MOE MARKED PM STAINTSIG . TAG FMN6 10.4 Y. 4. CONTRACTM SHALL SUPPLY TWO HYDRAN T PUG 4 C E 10 E O SaLLO ON THE MILAN , AND THE ECM) DPIV[EO TOTE MOM.NOMMOM. WRIT, S.OL NrNUNT EE LEADS ATO E OPSLTO T RIWITH DP. B. ALL WATERMb1 BOLTS SHALL E GORE -BLUE OR AMMO ERAW. T. HYDRA NTS M. 50 WAT BROS PACK ROB S) -25040 WIM TW O PUMMR NCIIES AS ECows.00 ST COY. HYDRANT DETAIL WAT-01 PRE CAST (NE AT MST E L/2 NWE1R esTE PIPE PM IMO . SLO PED 2.10 W Ma 1E MEAT. AE 4 NOTES: 1. SANITARY CASTINGS SHALL BE NEENAH R -1642B . M EDI NA M AO CASTING R16MS A 27 .L WOLE STEPS MI E PLACE D 05 CONE s WING 4 116-TRITcAL HA1 . WPM R16RB M ATE AND CODER OR EpML PRIM 20NEHE0 MQ X0., 5 MNORw DP 2 AND WO W. OF506RETE AOR STEHTM OS ABM FULL IO O MORTAR RE6WEFA SACK I RING WITH WNW .Or . MORTAR 9011 E RARE PORT,. SPFCMM AMTIED B pML 4.11•555.05.155. XA1(Amoco SK*B6OR Al11a2WD EQUAL) SHALL E MULLED MTH A.RO .w WAW A PROOF O LL UAMM AN CREWS 180610 4 DR APPROVED KA RL OGTOL SMALL.. E0 AROUND ME 01645 NO R INGS 40 OK I DO . CM! SECTION (r INTERIOR PA NOLE WALLS MALL MPLETELY LIMO 91114 10POPS91 E COMPLETELY WHI N MW PQLES 1 AROMP PO RPOR CR AS OMRWEE REQUIRED, SSE SPECIFICATIONS FOR 11011E WAILS. 66210E Sipe, NEENA N RISC OR EQUAL Le a9. Man. ALUMNA MPS A PPR OV ED . A62D NT5 IN Mott To owe .0.1.6 NIeBR BASKETS P OESIW : EM 011/0 661 WON INSIDE PA CE OF WALL 316+4-*. P OWWOW OR 10141 DEROKEIT69E NTRMTE MOM 966 mime. OF ME E AST WI 2 IS WPAIS EAND BEEP an NOR A66I ' IN TH.NESS Fm rare Oa OEDI GREATER MAN 14. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE MN, 2011 HA P SAN -01 ALL NOY cum RC M MIST MAW MR WREN AN EXISTING COPS BOX S ON A CONSTRUCTION OR RYCON SIWICTN4N PRO JECT, RIM ROCS SHAD. E MAUL, TO ALL OMB BORES ON THAT PROJECT. MB D TA S HA LL E PLIED r BELOW FINISH GARDE TRACER W INE SHA LL E COMMIT To THE O JIM Bo x wEINAN ArobEO CAST BRASS CHORD CLA W GRADE. MENU OF OMB MUM TIE MAP O AT LOCA TION OF OAHE 001 L(TID a PE TRARSITION FITINGB AWL E FOUR MA RE NM TRANSITION FITTINGS CA APPROVED EQWL M ob SHALL E ST RAN T M AID. ROBS MOVDO MOM@ BY ENGINEER F 1•FORD L MUTCNE COARCHA l10N STOP. sume5 STEEL Sba EPR 9f [6EGTIO N. VA IAn1 1 ,TAU FENCE PO STS ,TEN D Of WAVER AND POTTED BLUE MID GREEN ESPECNVEIY. i NENAH CASTING, .R-,914- 0. FORD AI, OP EQUAA msrnum OVER:. CURB STOP L OC ATED IN:. 61MWAY p ROANS TOT:, 10DRAIN M;AAO UO1TY FA424ENT WOMEN ENVIa SO NDAE O HU N ROPE -2M CURVED *AIR SER VICE j SE GME NTAL ',PVC COMER MAMMEnO(U AXIL IPS, PEI . .D OMES SUPPORT FOR COWS RATION A10 DLEANE. . AWL CONSIST OF AE OS. QS Cr. Or 66EGTEEQLW TO 31.9.. (.102 1,1200.0RO*.5OEY QM NK ED • b PE SER VICES ALLOVIEO W ITH W WAIEFFMO. WOOD r7r.UEA TOE I P ACED FROM r BELOW T O4- ADM SANITARY SERVICE MEDI NA SEWER AND WATER SERVICE CONNECTION JAN. 2011 hAte N o. 5ER-01 C-2 A MV O WATER. TEMPO/ IMO GRAD 1•14SAAIR RI PAMO CAST SAME MOUND CLAPP TO FO DIAL IRON M. ORB BOX OMAC NO8 12 p0 E ARL STRIP ORE. BURT WO 6¢T POP B OTH TR ACER WARES MG MOUE WIRE. SOUP, CO Bet M EDI NA TRACER WIRE CONNECTI ONS M. Mil W AT-0B 2, B. SANITARY SEWER - SCR 35 T021'. 809 26 FOR DEPTHS O VER 20 2. SERVICES AND RISERS SHALL BE 4' SCR 26. 3. EXTERNAL MANHOLE INFRASHIELDS ARE REQUIRED ON ALL MANHOLES. 4. EXTERNAL JOINT WRAP ARE RE QUIRED ON ALL MANHOLES . 5. ALL WATER MAIN SHALL BE PVC C900 DESIGNED TO OPERATE AT 150 PSI PLUS WATERHAM MER.(6 '-DIP CL52.8' C900 (7235 DR 18. 12' C900 CI305 DR14) 6. BUTTERFLY GATE VALVES ARE REQUIRED ON ALL WATERMAIN 12' 6060 LAR GER. ALL GATE VALVES SHALL HAVE STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS. 7. CURB BOXES TO HAVE EXTENSION RODS TO CURB STOP. 9. PR OVIDE P OLYETHYLENE WR AP (EMIL, TUBE TYPE) AROUND ALL W ATER MAIN IN ACC ORDANCE WITH AWW A C-105 ST AND ARDS . ME G-04.0 6 JOINT RESTR AINTS SHALL BE USED ON ALL FITTINGS. 9. HYDRANTS TO BE WB NO . WB-67 250 PP MODIFIED WITH STAINLESS BOLTS. PR OVIDE 2 HYDRAFINDER MARKING DEVICE AND RE -PAINT AFTER INSTALLATI ON. 10. HYDRANT SHALL BE B.O . BURY . WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE 7 .5. C OVER. HYDRANT LEADS SHALL BE CLASS 52 O.I.P. 11. ALL WATERMAIN BOLTS SHALL BE CORE -BLUE ',BOLTS WITH PROTECTED END CAPS. 12. TRACER WIRE SHALL BE RATED UL AND BE 612 COPPER SOLID WIRE STRAND. CONNECTED TO HYDRANT AT BOTTOM BREAKOFF BOLT WITH ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR. 13 . 1' 81.5• IPS PE (5DR t l) SER VI CE WITH CURB ST OP . CURB B OXES SHALL BE INSTALLED TEN FEET PAST THE ROW LINE . 14. ALL SEWER SERVICES ARE LOCATED 3' DOWNSTREAM OF WATER SERVICES. DESIGNER NO. BY DATE REV ISIO NS X. DRAWN BY ERJ CHECKED BY RSM DATE 06/06/13 USE (INCLUDING CO PYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/O R CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC: s EXPRESS WRITTEN A UTHORIZATIO N. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATIO N CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEM NIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BER GQUIST, INC. RESERV ES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMA TE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY R ESPONSIBLE FOR DAM AGES OR LOSSES R ESULTING FROM ILLEGITMA TE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISI ON AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE ST ATE OF MINNESOTA. ROBERT S. MOLST D, P .E . Dat e: O( .,Of,/3 Llc . No . i4.1 -/i,-8 �E ITS 2 I w� b N SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BR OADW AY W AYZATA, MN . 55391 (952) 476-6000 a= CITY PR OJECT N O. MEDINA, MINNESOTA FINAL SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN PLAN THE ENCLAVE AT MEDINA 5TH ADDITION LENNAR FILE NO. 5401-659 4 7 5 i l 3 1 995. 8 GrN ur,4.2 L 33,00 12 - W COR NER tic tor 14 ALV?T W SUM 241 10 8- Waternaln fONO rvl 997,0 hw/ 999,5 30 15 0 15 30 60 I. .L.� LJ■■■■J SCALE IN FEET (1014. 5) A-4 EXISTING WILIT%ES SHOWN AR E SHO WN IN AN APPROXIM ATE W Y O NLY. THE CO NTRACTO R SH ALL D ETERM INE THE EXAC T LOCATIO N OF ANY AND AI I EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING W ORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBI F FO R ANY APO ALL DAM AGES ARISING OU T OF H IS FA ILURE TO EXAC TLY LOCATE AN D PR ES ER VE ANY A ND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 6'CONCR'TE WALK (ty Remove Temp CDS A ro �N . LIN E OF LOT 14 AUar c83 S7B0. 241 S89 °51'41"W 647.66 01 0 1 ) 4 u arLiv�s 1 614 .66 0 \ STORM STRUCTURE SCHEDULE STRUCTURES DIAMETER TC INVERT BUILD CASTING NOTES CB MH 2 4 1,009 .50 998 .00 11.50 R-3067 CB 3 2 'X3' 1 .009 .50 1.005 .50 4.00 R-3067 A-1 15" 997.00 - 6.0 CY CL.3 RIPRAP NOTES 1. 4" DRAINTILE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE LOWPOINT CATCH BASINS 50' MIN . (Detail Sheet Str-05) (Detail Sto-13) 2. 6" PERFORATED REAR YARD DRAINTILE W/WRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED THROUGH THE INFILTRATION/FILTRATION AREAS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS . SEE T HE "T YPICAL DETAIL - I NFILTRATION/FILTRATION AREA" BELOW FOR INSTALLATI ON PURPOSES. (Detail Sto-13) 3. PLASTIC CB's SHALL BE NDS 12 "X12" FOR 6" DRAINTILE AND 18 "X18 " FOR 8" DRAINTILE 4. TIE THE LAST 6 PIPE J OINTS TO FLARED END SECTIONS (Typical). 5. TR ASH GUARDS SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL FL ARED END SECTI ONS (Detail Sheet Sto-08) 6. TIE ALL PIPE JOINTS IN AND OUT OF ALL OUTLET STRUCTURES (Typical) . 7. TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION PRIOR TO STREET CONSTRUCTI ON (D et ail She et Ero-07). 8. WI MC O'S OR APPROVED EQUAL TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL STORM INLETS . (Detail Ero-08) 9. GRANULAR MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED UNDE R STORM SEWER PIPE OR STRU CTURES THAT ARE LESS TH AN 48" BELOW FINISHED GRADE AND EXTEND TO AT LE AST 48" BELOW FINISHED GRADE . 10 . RIP -RAP FOR STORM SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED USING 1' DIAMETER OR LARGER AND SHALL BE HAND PLACED (Detail Sto-09). 11. RIP -RAP OVERFL OWS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 10 CY CLASS 3 RIP -RAP WITH A MINIMUM BOTTOM WIDTH OF 4' ON FABRIC . G 8 S DENOTE GRAVITY OR SU MP DRAINTILE SER VICE TYPES FOR SINGLE FAMILY L OTS. 1020 1- A 7 1010(------�- 1000 APRON 1 6' APRON 6 CY . CL 3 RIP -RAP NWL-997 .0 990 1- 980 L z 0+00 I CBMH2 I TC: 1009 .5 I BLD: 11.5 ( DIA: 48.0" 73 '-15" RC' CL .5 @ 1.3f3 % 0 +50 z r -1 CB 3 TC: 1009.5 BLD: 4 .0 DIA: 2'x3' _.4 26'-12 " RCP -- 1.14% z 1 +00 990 J 980 DESIGNER NO. BY DATE REVISIONS XXX DRAWN BY ERJ CHECKED BY RSM DATE USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTIO N, AND/O R CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHO UT SATHRE-BERGQ UIST, INC:s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZA TION. USE WITHO UT SAID AUTHORIZATIO N CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHA LL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF A LL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGO UIST, INC. RESERV ES THE R IGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMA TE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATIO N WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION A ND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER TH E LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. RO BERT S. MO LST D. P.E. t, , Date: O(JOy�3 Lic. No. -t F-8 CEPS SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 04 fWS PAP 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 CITY PROJECT NO. MEDINA, MINNESOTA FINAL STORM SEWER PLAN THE ENCLAVE AT MEDINA 5TH ADDITION LENNAR FILE N O. 5401-659 6 7 06/06/13 ----3 0 0 01 b 3 #1, CHINN &LO T 74 Nolor7 NMI N/ B. Ran ITYvI9'iG; 1 \ E DGE bF r'E 7LANa :. 50 25 EXISTING U TILITIES SHOWN AR E SHO WN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DE TERMINE THE EXACT LOC. ATION OF ANY AND All EXISTING U TILITIES BEFO RE COMM NCING WORN. HE AGR EES TO BF FUG Y RESPO NGIHLF FOR AN Y A ND ALL DAM AGES ARISIN G OU T OF MS FAILURE TO EXA CTLY LOCATE A ND PR ESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILTES. r1N tar or tons A LIMICIFS. HAI Hr 089°51'41'W 647. 66 \\\ 2 So* , 1 w so !Wt10 1pB 1911 4 1-14. ♦ i * . ♦ r9. ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ a=N ♦ i W ,♦ ♦ ♦ IMO.; ♦ ♦ . ww / Ad :0040 J40 05 ' 3 i 1 2 - 4,4-. 11 1 .,,A r AL LAlr or ur a 1 ,vam9s aun HI v k [04. 15 NORT H 0 25 50 100 ■ SC ALE IN FEET oQO QOQ ROCK ENTRANCE BERM — — — — SILT FENCE BIO-R OLL 1� CONCRETE WASH OUT INLET PROTECTION WOODFIBER BLANKET WETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT CONSERVATION AREA MON UMENT ON -SITE B MPS - (For more detailed information Secti on 2.2 of the SWPPPI 1. RE DUCE IMPERVIOUS AREA- REDUCTION IN STREET WIDTH FROM 32 T02 5. 2. NURP P OND- NURP POND WILL BE UTILIZED TO MEET OR EXCEED QUALITY A ND RATE C ONTR OL REQUIREMENTS. 3. SKIM MERS - THE POND OUTLET STRUCTURE INCLUDES A SUBMERGED INLET PIPE TO ALLOW SKIMMING.(UNIy Contactor) 4. RIP R AP - RIP R AP WILL BE UTILIZE D AT ALL AP RONS FOR ENER GY DISSIPATI ON AND PROVIDE SEDI MENT CONT ROL- (Utility Co ntra ctor) 5. INLET PROTECTION - INLET PROTECTION WILL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ALL CATCH BASINS & REAR YARD STRUCTURES . (W IMCC'S OR EQUAL) -(11311y Contractor) 6. SLOPE STA BILIZATI ON - SILT FE NCE WILL BE INSTALLED AL ONG D OWN GR ADIENT GR ADIN G LIMITS AND W OODFIBER BLANKET WILL BE UTILIZED ON ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SLOPE STABILIZATION . (Gradi ng Co ntact or) 7. BIOROLLS - BIOROLLS WILL BE INST ALLED ALONG RE AR YARD SWALES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM REA CHIN G THE NURP P OND AND ULTIM ATELY DOWNSTR EA M WETLAN DS(Gradir6 Co ntr actor). B. INFILTRATION AREAS - INFILTRATI ON AREAS WILL BE UTIUZED TO REDUCE THE AM OUNT OF RUNOFF FR OM THE INCREASED HARDSURFACE. (Grading Contractor) 9. ST REET SWEEPI NG - ST REET SWEEPI NG WILL BE DO NE A MINI MU M OF ON CE PER WEEK OR AS NEEDED TO MINIMIZE DUST CONT ROL AND VEHICLE TRACKING .(Grairt and UtYty C ontractor) 10. PHOSPH OR OUS FREE FERTILIZER PHOSPHOROUS FREE FERTIUZER WILL ALSO BE USED ON SITE - 11. ALL CONCRETE WAS HOUT W ASTE PRODUCED SH ALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE . (Utility Contractor) DESIGNER NO. BY DA TE REVISIONS XXX DRAWN BY ER J CHECKED BY RSM DATE 06/06/13 USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/O R CO NV EYA NCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BER GOUIST, INC: s EXPR ESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BER GQUIST, INC. OF ALL R ESPO NSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD A NY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAM AGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY TH AT THIS PLAN OR SPE CIFICATI ON W AS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDE R MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSI ONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LA WS OF THE STATE OF MINNES OTA. ROBERT S. M OLST D, P.E. Date: Ojai. LI°. No. ti SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC . RS 150 S OUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 71.P� CITY PROJECT NO. MEDINA, MINNESOTA FINAL GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN THE ENCLAVE AT MEDINA 5TH ADDITION LENNAR ' FILE NO . 5401-659 7 7 AGENDA ITEM: 7 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner DATE: July 2, 2013 MEETING: July 9, 2013 Planning Commission SUBJ: St. Peter and Paul Cemetery — Conditional Use Permit — southeast of County Road 19 and Hamel Road — Public Hearing Review Deadline Complete Application Received: 120 -day Review Deadline: Overview of Request The Church of St. Peter and Paul has requested conditional use permit approval to expand their cemetery at the southeast corner of County Road 19 and Hamel Road. Proposed improvements include 600 new burial sites, an additional looped access drive which matches the existing looped road, raingardens to treat runoff from the additional hard surface, a trail system around the expanded cemetery, and landscaping improvements. The applicant has also requested CUP approval to construct future columbaria structures, although none are expected in the short-term. Cemeteries are Conditional Uses in the Rural Residential (RR) zoning district, subject to various supplemental review criteria which will be discussed later in this report. There are two parts of the existing cemetery: the historic cemetery to the east of the site, and the active portion of the cemetery immediately west of the wetland. The expansion is proposed to occupy the western portion of the site which is currently vacant. RR-UR ZONING DISTRICT REGIONAL PARK PS ZONING DISTRICT Analysis Section 826.98 of the City Code includes a list of criteria by which to review CUPs for cemeteries. This entire list is attached, with a description of the application's compliance with each item in the list. The remainder of this report goes more into depth with the more noteworthy items. Setbacks / Hardcover RR District Requirement Proposed Front Yard Setback 50 feet 50 feet Rear Yard Setback 50 feet 50 feet Side Yard Setback 50 feet 50 feet Impervious Surfaces 40% 12.8% Building Height 30 feet N/A The applicant proposes to place burial plots against the minimum setbacks (50 feet) to the north, south, and west. The applicant's drawing actually show the burials in the southwest corner of the site to cross the setback line, but staff recommends a condition to remove these sites if they do not meet setback requirements. Wetlands/Floodplains An existing wetland is located in the western -center of the site, and no wetland impacts are proposed. In fact, the proposed construction will not drain to this wetland area and, as a result, the application does not trigger the City's wetland buffer ordinance. No floodplain areas are mapped on the subject site. Building Design At this time, no specific plans are proposed for structures on the property. The applicant has submitted information on potential future columbaria structures. The structures are stone and less than 10 feet in total height. Staff recommends that a condition be added which provides approval for structures substantially similar to the structure shown in the applicant's submittal. Any other type of structure would need an amended CUP. Stormwater and LID Review The applicant proposes four raingardens to meet the City's surface water management requirements. These raingardens will also be part of the landscaping plan of the site. In terms of LID practices, the applicant proposes to limit hardcover for parking and also proposes to only utilize turf grass in the areas of the burials. Access /Parking City ordinances require roadways within cemeteries to be a minimum of 20 feet in width. The existing roads are less than 20 feet in width, generally between 17-18 feet. The applicant proposes 18 feet wide roads for the expansion. Staff recommends that any new roads be 20 feet in width. The cemetery expansion is served off of the existing 17-18 foot wide interior road. Staff also recommends that the Planning Commission and Council discuss whether the portion of St. Peter and Paul Cemetery Page 2 of 5 July 9, 2013 Conditional Use Permit Planning Commission Meeting the existing road serving the expansion warrants widening. In order to reach the proposed expansion areas, one would need to travel approximately 200 linear feet over the existing interior road off of Hamel Road. Staff recommends that both the existing loop and the new proposed loop road be signed as "one way" and that parking restrictions be enacted at specified locations in order to improve circulation. With one-way traffic around the loops and "no -parking" allowed on one side, adequate circulation should be possible with a 20 -foot wide road. The applicant does not propose any parking. Unlike Holy Name Cemetery, which was reviewed for an expansion a few years ago, St. Peter and Paul Church is not adjacent to the cemetery. Internment ceremonies will necessitate processions. Generally, City parking regulations attempt to keep parking from private property from impacting public streets as well as internal circulation. In the case of a cemetery, this would require large amounts of parking which would very rarely be utilized. In discussion with Medina police, large processions at this cemetery do occasionally park along Hamel Road. However, processions of this size will have security/police assistance and have not generally caused traffic concerns. In terms of parking on the interior roadways, it appears that the following parking could be accommodated on the subject site: • New loop road = 14 (if portion is signed "no parking" for emergency access) • Existing loop road = 12 (if portion is signed "no parking" for emergency access) • Road between loops = 0 (staff recommends "no parking" for emergency access) • Narrow drive to east of existing loop = 38 spaces (no room to pass) The gravel road heading east to the historic portion of the cemetery is approximately 12 feet in width and an additional 38 vehicles could line up on this stretch. However, this becomes very distant from burial location, and does not leave it possible for vehicles to pass one another. Previous CUP approval for a cemetery had included a requirement that proof -of -parking areas be reserved in case parking becomes a problem in the future. In this case, the "lawn" areas within the center of the new looped road could serve for future parking, if such a need existed. Landscaping/Tree Preservation No trees are proposed to be removed. City ordinances require that "landscaping shall include overstory trees and be designed to promote a parklike setting." Staff believes the applicant's proposed landscaping plan accomplishes this objective. Conditional Use Permit Findings According to Section 825.39, "in granting a conditional use permit, the [City] shall consider...the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of occupants or surrounding lands. Among other things, the [City] shall consider the following: • That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity. • That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area. St. Peter and Paul Cemetery Page 3 of 5 July 9, 2013 Conditional Use Permit Planning Commission Meeting " T h a t a d e q u a t e u t i l i t i e s , a c c e s s r o a d s , d r a i n a g e a n d o t h e r n e c e s s a r y f a c i l i t i e s h a v e b e e n o r a r e b e i n g p r o v i d e d . " T h a t a d e q u a t e m e a s u r e s h a v e b e e n o r w i l l b e t a k e n t o p r o v i d e s u f f i c i e n t o f f - s t r e e t p a r k i n g a n d l o a d i n g s p a c e t o s e r v e t h e p r o p o s e d u s e . " T h a t a d e q u a t e m e a s u r e s h a v e b e e n o r w i l l b e t a k e n t o p r e v e n t o r c o n t r o l o f f e n s i v e o d o r , f u m e s , d u s t , n o i s e a n d v i b r a t i o n , s o t h a t n o n e o f t h e s e w i l l c o n s t i t u t e a n u i s a n c e , a n d t o c o n t r o l l i g h t e d s i g n s a n d o t h e r l i g h t s i n s u c h a m a n n e r t h a t n o d i s t u r b a n c e t o n e i g h b o r i n g p r o p e r t i e s w i l l r e s u l t . " T h e u s e , i n t h e o p i n i o n o f t h e C i t y C o u n c i l , i s r e a s o n a b l y r e l a t e d t o t h e o v e r a l l n e e d s o f t h e C i t y a n d t o t h e e x i s t i n g l a n d u s e . " T h e u s e i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e p u r p o s e s o f t h e z o n i n g c o d e a n d t h e p u r p o s e s o f t h e z o n i n g d i s t r i c t i n w h i c h t h e a p p l i c a n t i n t e n d s t o l o c a t e t h e p r o p o s e d u s e . " T h e u s e i s n o t i n c o n f l i c t w i t h t h e p o l i c i e s p l a n o f t h e C i t y . " T h e u s e w i l l n o t c a u s e t r a f f i c h a z a r d o r c o n g e s t i o n . " E x i s t i n g b u s i n e s s e s n e a r b y w i l l n o t b e a d v e r s e l y a f f e c t e d b y i n t r u s i o n o f n o i s e , g l a r e o r g e n e r a l u n s i g h t l i n e s s . " T h e d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a t i m e s c h e d u l e f o r c o m p l e t i o n o f t h e p r o j e c t . " T h e d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e p r o o f o f o w n e r s h i p o f t h e p r o p e r t y t o t h e Z o n i n g O f f i c e r . " S i t e P l a n R e v i e w F i n d i n g s A c c o r d i n g t o S e c t i o n 8 2 5 . 5 6 t h e C i t y " s h a l l r e v i e w t h e p r o p o s e d s i t e p l a n t o d e t e r m i n e w h e t h e r i t i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f t h i s o r d i n a n c e , i n c l u d i n g t h e a p p l i c a b l e d e v e l o p m e n t s t a n d a r d s a n d t h e p u r p o s e o f t h e z o n i n g d i s t r i c t i n w h i c h t h e p r o p e r t y i s l o c a t e d . " S t a f f R e c o m m e n d a t i o n S t a f f b e l i e v e s t h a t t h e p r o p o s e d c o n d i t i o n a l u s e p e r m i t a n d s i t e p l a n a r e c o n s i s t e n t w i t h C i t y r e g u l a t i o n s a n d p o l i c i e s , s u b j e c t t o t h e t e r m s a n d c o n d i t i o n s n o t e d b e l o w . S t a f f , t h e r e f o r e , r e c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l w i t h t h e f o l l o w i n g c o n d i t i o n s : 1 ) I m p r o v e m e n t s s h a l l b e c o n s t r u c t e d a n d b u r i a l s l o c a t e d a s d e s c r i b e d i n t h e p l a n s r e c e i v e d b y t h e C i t y o n J u n e 1 0 , 2 0 1 3 , e x c e p t a s m o d i f i e d h e r e i n . 2 ) T h e a p p l i c a n t s h a l l e n t e r i n t o a d e v e l o p m e n t a g r e e m e n t r e l a t e d t o t h e t e r m s a n d c o n d i t i o n s c o n t a i n e d h e r e i n a n d o t h e r r e l e v a n t C i t y r e q u i r e m e n t s a n d p o l i c i e s . 3 ) P l a n s s h a l l b e u p d a t e d s o t h a t n e w a c c e s s r o a d s a r e a m i n i m u m o f 2 0 f e e t i n w i d t h , a n d s h a l l b e d e s i g n e d a n d i n s t a l l e d t o a s t a n d a r d a c c e p t a b l e t o t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r . 4 ) A l l b u r i a l s a n d c r e m a t i o n n i c h e s s h a l l b e a m i n i m u m o f 5 0 - f e e t f r o m a l l p r o p e r t y l i n e s . P l a n s s h a l l b e u p d a t e d t o r e m o v e b u r i a l s i t e s w h i c h d o n o t m e e t t h i s s e t b a c k r e q u i r e m e n t . M o n u m e n t s a n d m a r k e r s s h a l l b e c o n s t r u c t e d o f n a t u r a l s t o n e , b u t n o m o n u m e n t o r m a r k e r s h a l l b e c o n s t r u c t e d o f l i m e s t o n e , s a n d s t o n e o r a n y o t h e r t y p e o f s t o n e t h a t w i l l n o t m a i n t a i n r e l a t i v e p e r m a n e n c y . 5 ) F u t u r e c o l u m b a r i a s t r u c t u r e s m a y b e c o n s t r u c t e d , p r o v i d e d t h e y a r e i n t h e l o c a t i o n s s h o w n o n t h e p l a n s r e c e i v e d b y t h e C i t y o n J u n e 1 0 , 2 0 1 3 a n d a r e c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e s t r u c t u r e s s h o w n i n t h e p l a n s . A l t e r n a t i v e l o c a t i o n s o r s t r u c t u r e s s h a l l r e q u i r e a m e n d e d c o n d i t i o n a l u s e p e r m i t a p p r o v a l . 6 ) T h e a c c e s s d r i v e , r a i n g a r d e n s , a n d l a n d s c a p i n g s h a l l b e i n s t a l l e d p r i o r t o b u r i a l s o c c u r r i n g i n t h e e x p a n d e d c e m e t e r i e s . S t . P e t e r a n d P a u l C e m e t e r y P a g e 4 o f 5 J u l y 9 , 2 0 1 3 C o n d i t i o n a l U s e P e r m i t P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n M e e t i n g 7) Drives shall be signed as "one-way" and "no parking" in appropriate location as determined by City staff. 8) No parking shall be permitted on one side of the access roads. 9) The applicant shall provide traffic control for large processions or other larger events. Specific traffic control plans may be required at the discretion of the Police Chief. 10) Cemetery parking shall only be permitted on public streets if approved by Medina Police. 11) The applicant shall identify proof -of -parking locations on the cemetery site. In the event parking, circulation and emergency access to the cemetery parcel become a concern, or if a parking agreement with the property across the street is not in place, the City retains the right to require the applicant to construct some or all of the proof -of -parking. 12) The cemetery shall continue to be operated in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 306 or 307 and the cemetery shall continue to provide sufficient maintenance and perpetual care funds as required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 306 or 307. 13) The applicant shall obtain necessary permits from the City, Pioneer -Sarah Watershed, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and any other relevant agency prior to commencing construction activity on the property. 14) The applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the conditional use permit and other relevant documents. Attachments 1. CUP Standards for cemeteries 2. Applicant Narrative 3. Plans St. Peter and Paul Cemetery Page 5 of 5 July 9, 2013 Conditional Use Permit Planning Commission Meeting Attachment 1 - CUP Standards Conditional Use Permit Standards for Cemteries: (i) maximum lot area of ten acres; The proposed site is 8.5 acres. (ii) located with direct access to a collector or arterial roadway as identified in the comprehensive plan; Hamel Road is a Major Collector. (iii) all roadways within the cemetery must be paved and 20 feet wide unless the city determines that a wider road is necessary for public safety; The applicant proposes to construct the new portion of the access drive 18 feet in width, and requests that the existing drive be allowed to remain its current width (17-18). Staff recommends that all new internal roads be a minimum of 20 feet in width. Please see discussion in staff report on Access and Parking for more information. (iv) direct views from all adjoining residential parcels must be screened by appropriate means; The applicant proposes 51 deciduous, 5 coniferous, and 24 ornamental trees. (v) all burial sites must be set back the greater of the following distances from all property lines. Identified future burial sites within existing cemeteries which are on file with the city prior to December 31, 2007 shall not be subject to this setback requirement: (1) a distance equal to the structure setbacks that are required by the applicable zoning district; or (2) 20 feet. The required setback in the Rural Residential district is 50 feet. Some burial sites on the western portion of the site do not appear to be setback 50 feet. Staff recommends a condition that requires the removal of burial sites which do not abide by this requirement. (vi) buildings, parking areas, mausoleums, columbariums and upright grave markers that exceed 24 inches in height must be set back a minimum of 50 feet from all property lines; The columbaria structure is more than 170' from property lines; All proposed gravesites are greater than 50 feet from property lines and are proposed to be at -grade. (vii) all improvements, including grave sites, must be set back a minimum of 50 feet from all wetlands; The closest improvements to the wetland are the in -ground baby graves, which are more than 65 feet from the delineated edge of the wetland. (viii) established and operated in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 306 or 307, as amended; Indications are that the cemetery is operated in compliance, and staff recommends a condition to this effect. (ix) sufficient maintenance and perpetual care funds as required by Minnesota Statutes Chapters 306 or 307 shall be established; Indications are that the cemetery is operated in compliance, and staff recommends a condition to this effect. (x) landscaping shall include overstory trees and be designed to promote a parklike setting; The applicant proposes 51 deciduous, 5 coniferous, and 24 ornamental trees. (xi) monuments or markers within a cemetery shall be placed as shown on the cemetery's master plan or as directed by the city; Staff recommends a condition on the resolution formalizing this requirement. (xii) mausoleums shall not exceed 15 feet in height and monuments shall not exceed 10 feet in height, with height measured as it is for buildings; The proposed columbaria structures are less than 10 feet in height and all monuments in the cemetery expansion are proposed to be flush with the ground. (xiii) monuments and markers shall be constructed of natural stone, but no monument or marker shall be constructed of limestone, sandstone or any other type of stone that will not maintain relative permanency; Staff recommends a condition on the resolution formalizing this requirement. (xiv) monuments and markers shall be structurally sound and be placed upon foundations of solid masonry at a depth and size so as to assure no settling or movement of the marker or monument; The applicant has submitted specifications showing that each headstone will include a foundation, the depth of which varies with the stone marker. (xv) concrete aprons at least four inches in width that are level with the ground shall be placed around monuments and be affixed to them so as to prevent grass, weeds or other vegetation from growing in between the monuments and aprons; The applicant has submitted specification showing adequate aprons. (xvi) a site plan acceptable to the city council must be submitted and reviewed under the city's site plan ordinance; The Site Plan is being reviewed and approved simultaneously with the CUP. (xvii) a master plan for the build -out of the property which includes the number and location of all burial lots; the phasing of selling/filling the burial lots; the assigned numbers for the burial lots; descriptions and locations of any other improvements to be located on the property; and a description of the cemetery's records retention system must be submitted and approved by the city council; The proposed expansion does not include a "phasing" plan, and all lots will be for sale upon approval. (xviii) ground water tests shall be performed prior to city council approval in order to determine high water tables and any springs located on the site; The applicant has ordered borings to provide ground water information as recommended by the City Engineer. The topography of the site appears to suggest that there should not be concerns. Staff will confirm prior to approval. (xix) the city council may require a transportation plan that includes traffic management for burials, funerals and burial site visits; Staff has recommended a few conditions related to traffic management. (xx) the city council may require an environmental assessment of the proposed use; Staff does not recommend requiring an environmental assessment for the expansion. (xxi) in addition to the requirements set forth in this provision, the city council may require compliance with any other conditions, restrictions or limitations regarding the type, location, size, material, number, the manner of placement and installation, and removal of monuments, markers, mausoleums, columbariums and plantings that are permitted within the cemetery it deems to be reasonably necessary to protect the residential character of the neighborhood. Staff has recommended a number of conditions to limit potential impacts. (xxii) the city council may require compliance with any other conditions, restrictions or limitations it deems to be reasonably necessary to protect the residential character of the neighborhood. Staff has recommended a number of conditions to limit potential impacts. REQUESTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EXISTING SAINTS PETER AND PAUL CEMETERY- MEDINA, MN PROJECT OVERVIEW Saints Peter and Paul Cemetery was established in 1867 on a roughly 8.5 -acre parcel located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Hamel Road and County Road 19. Burials started on the eastern portion of the site and have been proceeding to the west. We are requesting approval of a conditional use permit to prepare the far west portion of the existing cemetery for an additional 600 future burial plots as well as future feature areas with columbarium. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL The subject parcel is legally described as follows: A portion of Northeast 'X of Section 7, Township 118, Range 23, beginning at the center of Section 7, then East 20.68 chains, then North 19.5 degrees East 1.5 chains, then North 37 degrees West 4.45 chains, then West 18.5 chains, then South 4.96 chains to beginning. (Note: This Is a partial metes and bounds description.) ZONING AND SURROUNDING LAND USE The existing cemetery is located in the Rural Residential -Urban Reserve (RR-UR) Zoning Districts. The properties directly to the north, east, and west of the cemetery are also in the RR-UR Zoning District and include rural residences and farmland. The property directly to the south of cemetery is existing parkland owned by Three Rivers Park District. Refer to Figure 1: Context Aerial Photograph on the following page. • • •A AREA OF " • PROPOSED • EXIS 9 MPROVEMENTS: ' CEMEfFRY • • Figure 1: ContextAerial Photograph EXISTING HISTORIC CEMETERY Requests Associated with Saints Peter and Paul Cemetery — Medina, MN Page 11 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The City's Zoning Ordinance lists a cemetery as a conditional use in the RR-UR Zoning District. The proposed improvements to the existing cemetery are consistent with the conditional use provisions described in Sections 825.39 of the Zoning Ordinance. The following highlights the key aspects of the proposed cemetery improvements as they relate to our request for approval of a conditional use permit. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOT AREA The entire cemetery (including the existing and proposed improvement areas of the cemetery) is on an 8.5 -acre parcel, which is consistent with the maximum allowable lot area of ten acres required by the Zoning Ordinance. ACCESS The Zoning Ordinance requires that cemeteries have direct access to a collector or arterial roadway. Saints Peter and Paul Cemetery is currently accessed from Hamel Road, which the City's Comprehensive Plan identifies as a collector road. This work does not involve creating a new access. MASTER PLAN FOR BUILD -OUT, PHASING, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE Proposed improvements to the existing cemetery will occur in phases. The first phase will begin as soon as possible after approvals and permits have been obtained. Subsequent phases will occur over time as needed. Phase 1 Improvements: 2013-2014 (Refer to Exhibit A: Drawings — Sheet 11: Illustrative Plan, Sheet LO: Layout/Concept Plan, and LS: Landscape Plan) • Extend the existing 20 -foot wide internal bituminous drive to the west; • Maintain a 50 -foot wide prairie/grassland buffer along the north, west, and south boundaries of the subject area of the cemetery; • Provide a mown walking path that will meander through the prairie/grassland area; • Provide rain gardens in the prairie/grassland area to address storm water runoff; and • Plant a variety of trees along the perimeter and interior of the subject area. Phase 2 Improvements: Will Occur Over Time as Needed (Possibly After 2023 — Refer to Exhibit A: Drawings — Sheet 11: Illustrative Plan and Sheet L0: Layout/Concept Plan) ■ Install three columbarium around the proposed bituminous drive (see Exhibit B: Future Columbarium); and ■ Install pavers and special feature (such as columbarium or art feature) at the center of the proposed circular bituminous drive Operation and Maintenance The cemetery has been established, is operated, and has sufficient maintenance and perpetual care funds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 307: Private Cemeteries. Requests Associated with Saints Peter and Paul Cemetery — Medina, MN Page 12 SCREENING, LANDSCAPING, AND TREE PRESERVATION The Ordinance requires that direct views of the cemetery from all adjoining residential parcels must be screened by appropriate means. The nearest residence is over 600 feet from the cemetery. The proposed cemetery improvements include a 50 -foot grassland/prairie buffer at the periphery of the proposed improvement area. We will preserve the existing trees and plant a variety of overstory and ornamental trees as well (see Exhibit A: Drawings - Sheet LS: Landscape Plan). SETBACKS AND ALLOWABLE HEIGHTS Consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, parking areas, columbarium, and burials will be setback a minimum of 50 feet from all property lines in subject area of the existing cemetery. As required, monuments and columbarium will not exceed ten feet in height. SOILS AND GROUND WATER The Hennepin County Soil Survey classifies the soil in the subject area of the cemetery as U3B-Udorthents. This is the same soil type that is in the adjacent developed part of the cemetery directly to the east of the subject area. The soil consists of loamy material on a roughly two percent slope. The soil survey indicates that there is no flooding or ponding associated with this soil type. It does not indicate any concerns with the water table. Given that subject area of the cemetery is on the high end of the site and in the upper area of the watershed, the soils and water table should not present any concerns related to the requested expansion of burial sites in the existing cemetery. (See Exhibit C: Soils) GRADING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The existing grades work well for the proposed cemetery improvements. The only disturbed areas of the site will involve minimal grading to install the proposed rain gardens. In addition, a limited amount of turf and topsoil will be removed to allow for construction of the proposed internal bituminous drive. In all, the proposed improvements (including improvements that will occur in future phases) will disturb approximately 14,700 square feet (or 0.34 acres) of the site. We have thoroughly reviewed the City's Stormwater Design Guide and we have worked closely with the City Engineer's office on the stormwater issues related to the proposed improvements to the existing cemetery. In accordance with Section 3.0 (1) (c) of the Stormwater Design Guide, the proposed improvements are classified as a "minor expansion project" that increases impervious area by more than 5,000 square feet and less than one- half acre. Consequently, installation of a rain garden or similar stormwater improvement is acceptable in lieu of a detailed Stormwater Management Plan. The rain garden must have a base area equal to 0.0733 times the area of the new impervious material (14,700 square feet). Therefore, the rain gardens for the proposed improvement area must have an area of at least 1,080 square feet (0.0733 x 14,700 = 1,080). We will be installing four rain gardens totaling 1,812 square feet. (See Sheet LO: Layout/Concept Plan and Sheet LS: Landscape Plan) SIGNAGE AND LIGHTING The cemetery will maintain its existing monument sign located at the corner of County Road 19 and Hamel Road. We are not proposing to install additional signage. There is no lighting associated with this project. Requests Associated with Saints Peter and Paul Cemetery — Medina, MN Pa g e 13 smEr�r ig. I COLD SPRING GRANITE MEMORIAL GROUP o�o l � A Division of Cold Spring Granite Company pottwmfts 124 NICHE R.OMANF,SQUE COLUMBARIUM DESIGN #8744 -CI Long Side I la ' I 1 1}. 1 t4` . 1 I I ti l _L4 t Niche Plan r I 01,14,1 202 South Third Avenue, Cold Spring, MN 56320 www.coldspringgranite.com Granit-Bronz Mausoleum 800-328-2312 / Fax 320-685-5008 gbmaus©coldspringgranite.com BY I�Or,,..,1 7'-0" (TYP DOUBLE GRAVE) CONC APRON WITH 4" WIDE MOW STRIP TYP (MIN) GRANITE MONUMENT AND BASE (SIZE VARIES) 4" WIDE MOW STRIP TYP (MIN) GRANITE MONUMENT AND BASE -� 5" DEEP CONC. APRON (MIN) EXIST GRADE/LAWN 3'-6" t N 0 N 0 0 PLAN OF TYPICAL DOUBLE GRAVE 10'-0" BURIAL LOT 8'-0" EXCAVATED GRAVE 7-6" VAULT 4" DEEP SAND BASE (MIN) BURIAL VAULT CASKET SECTION OF TYPICAL GRAVE N W 5 TO 6' DEEP GRAVE H AMEL ROAD I BUR OAK CO MMON HA CKBERRI! : r= BUR O AK ILLUSTRATIV E PLAN 111111111111111111111111M 111111111111111111111,. 1111111111111111! ff; IuIIIIINI11111s BLACK HILLS SPRUCE PROPER TY BO UNDAR Y 11111111111111111111111111111!�I. COMMON HA CK BER RY COMMON BU R HACKBERRY OAK /,-_ ,-_� i __________ / ---- L \ I111111111111111111IIII11111111111 )PIuIIllhIIIuIIIIUhIIIIllIH •' •. IIIIIIII J IIIII11111111111 -111111111 r r' z .�hi11111i111hii161 111111111111111H111 111111111111111 ���( 3 1111III111111111111111111k. �. � :11111111111111111111111111111 ns■■i■.iia..■■iiaiii u■i■i ui ., t— ii a istltii i i ii u E 111 \/ \ / N. Tt T ,-1 ? I 1--i , , 1 i . ii 1 l'„1..1 1! }/I 1 I€\ ' 1 i;1:41111!, 1111 ..--t --I '- Tf 1- 1 1 1 I ' ' ! . 1 1 I I I l i 1-T 1 1 i' t. `1 . i' 1 1 1 1 1 1 I! ,111':1 1't1 it1'1111l '1I' II 1111 :. 11 1'.i. 11 t� '1 11111 H--I-Pf +-'4- i f-i++ { I , 4----- k-„ ,-,H -11 - 7;11 1,11 11111,Ir,11111 ;Ill lis i!I1( I 1 1 /1'1`1`1 ' 1 1 1 1 / . 1' I/I i 1 1 n 1/ 1 1 1 1 \ I I V , x„ \ -, o 1 / r . .\ I e D-- // 1 A. / II ill] • / i I / / 1 . t --r i-1 ✓\1 'I I T. I .1 11 1 1 1 1/ I1 I \I 1 4 1 1/ 1 1 I H-1-1‘4,1.---C-1--1— I:111^IIIIi1,1i , 1,111 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1. 1,, I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .111111111 III I I! 11111 1 I--I-I+H H -l1 1 1 1-4-+t + I I!IiIlllillllll1, 111 11 11 11111 1 '1 111111111111111114 111 :" 1 1 1 +--1-+ 1-.4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 !11!1111111111111111 "' Iil111111+±1- H 41 I_ 1 I 1 1 ! 4 1 11 `� � '/f'4 _ bQ11\ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (L9'L1 : 1 1 14 �\ •t3JJ_LJ 1 1 \,\ ~+, 1 1 4 1 i 1 f -H 1-+- 11/1111, 1 / 1 {} 1! 1 1 1 1 1 / / ,1 .N /1 1 1, i i l Illiii t!l€f; I I I l l l l 1 r �- t Ti rf �' 1 !II III ri tl I:I!1111,1ii 1 V 4 „ 1 1 1 1 1 4 1,, Ly.LL1 J II 1 ,,, I (T? --11-1 .1�•.. . I (l 1 I,,, 1 I 1 1 I t- --- I i I 1 r,, 1 /// l i t ityl' / VI I I 1, 1 1 __ _ l I t 1,1 1 1 1 1 /1 / F -1---i. %1,,. ...,_ ..1 I I I 1 I 1- { 1 1! 1 / rrr /� f'f'-f"' 1T 1 f"1 t\ \ 11 I 1 I! 1 1 I I I I I i I / // \+ I I I1! li ` \\ t 11 1 l I 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 / / // 111 / I/.; 1 1- `1 '-1T-1,,,i‘\\ \\ I I I I I 1 1 1 1 / ,) I -T� Ilit y 11,11 11111 / /\Iii y1 1 I ,1/ r, 1, 1 1 1 ♦ % // I T I`L Jllllllll,til `♦ -�- �,- /„ 11111111 i l l l l l l l L1 1 / -' // \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 !� / _\ /'-' '..1K' • t I 1 1, I I, I I I i i ' (I ! I/-."�� A / t `t 1 1/ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �'--I 1 I I I I 1 \ •1 I lit •--t------- i• n,/ I 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 l 1 IA1 , I l f t t �\ )+-1.Vf I I I! 1 l Ili 1-1--+ +Ff :--H+--f i+ f- : 1-1-rf-rat --r_ err -1 t I-�1--r•t-rNr.=r!/i-F-H .. ; 4 H II 111 I I I< I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 rl ly:-r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'! 1 1 1 1; 1 1 1 1 —T-7,77'-rrTITIT`Till Flrii 4,111 II II'i1 '1414 BUR O AK CO MMON HACKBERRY C OMM ON HACKBERRY 1018 THREE RIVERS P ARK DISTRICT - - - - 1016 _ 1 1 ' 1 1 11 1 1 1 I I i I I I I I 1 I I i I 11141111141 I I I I II I I 11114:,'111111111 11111111111 1!1141111 1 I I r. 1 1 111 I, !I H 1- 1 1 ; NORTH SANDERS WACKER BERGLY INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS 365 East Kellogg Blvd Saint Paul . MN 55101 Phone (651) 221-0401 Fax (651) 297-6817 www swbinc cam SAINTS PETER AN D P AUL CEMETERY MEDINA, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct s upernslo n and that I am a duly register ed L anduap e Architect under the lows of the Slat e of Minnesot a. Signature D ote. Reg Number Project Number Draw n By Onginal Issue Dole 1026 904 02/20/13 ILLUSTRATIVE PL AN SHEET I1 I I+wlrt Name ,.. c aw ..AE, /. s ... r os •u s. r 1- 1 3 2 3 z I art [r. IL' 43 • aii t lit .= 5 3 3 2 s i3 ats 2 b v 11 r' 1 1 NOR TH County Road Na (oof M.w Mpd C000f7 33902 037 Ma i m ar 533 .s` to - .Y s.. LIMO Elm. Yo , Ox Y Ms *SW", .S0 1 6 a 1 ,a' .v' 8 .3' a 2 1 1 -3 t .. ;r -!Son O n000ps O 20 40 . ,0 nru SCALE IN F2*T .✓' ,s0 A 115 •iP .d7 .6. ,d ( Hamel Road) .I' 027 •- •'d> 'O•• --'2r on of Oa'Noc s No n3 o w, M.. is sartro ' % cw*tr .r oy s. 301 out 33 40 _s dt .0 0 .d> G2 7 •PV ,d' 3027 3-, 020 MAR 30• Ma r 3027 •0 h2. AM 055'/l of Ste 0, 7 257 5. 5 23 57 .00 0 ' .0 0 ee .•4 020* ,d ' .d 3 028 der •se d' .d' • .r„ cam+ ' •-7 1027 '- . IIDOT MorYrn1 27225 bold 5 te a 5al/.Nd come r a 8%Ia II_, Ns 55 aw1C any lima No. 19 001100111055 19 fe et INGVD 190 ds% .q -ai l Or. Ns531st 6rt►-- .s• 7 ._. ,g2 SURVEY LEGEND f POWER MBE cur WIRE �58I TC 10► OF O. '7 TOP MS FR N119G 70161 .M M ALE M PINE SP SPRUCE TR TREE (Lied) ca'.BSROt15 TREE -CULVERT - a0* - ulCERa 0U510 ELECTR IC - 4*- UNDERGROUND GAS - 'a-UNDERGROUND TELEPH ON E - a-OVERHEAD 1/111277 -•-• - OWN LSmt FENCE CONCRETE CUR B 023 DESCRIPTION QF PROPERTY !MG N 48o 1 o g. 422) dead. Pu A patron of Ma 10535.111 124 of Saran 7, Te5NN9 118 , Rang 23 to wA ammahin5 atdm cantor .1 * ter latd Se aton . 511,0e noilp East an wafter .s alon Me 2061 d ine. tholes North 37 dept Walt 445 dlwa. MNee WM 1850 Ahu ra s wader s.do.anis Ounce So uth 496 chains to tlac e 0I commencing. 102, 7"- -r se d' New. .111 mod : z• o. dLSm 4 1 The NV draulpeon and 818 5550Pleres shown an Ws storey, yr wen attuned from an Owners and Encumbranc e Repo posed by Commerdat Paters Thld . fat. te a 1303858 . dated May 10 2013 v6 2 We haw sham berled atnr dllree and utilities on Nebo mama Ina alts to Me bast of owl wlay, subject to 810 tollocang reetdctlarn: Utilty operators d0 not arhwerl0y respond to locate novas % trough Oh G oghf MN* One CM seta to bounda ry purpa. sods N MN 0) Tloa. 1115./ *Merinos vat do respond ore sod not !oats genic.. ben 830 min Ms la 110 Oa101110 ab ua.a or N*•b - dray eaddw thorns manumb mb pi rate IoW Wsr QW 0 00%01. tan Ma dde n No MIAs service to an agd 5sh Me cremes MN ale a 1.0040* to Wsses mama an *Rai ner, rt may n01 a located Ina moat *M outon MI MI marts such w) Snow aM is andMes doting wmal ma ma may Abase ohsrlte a wsd .widows of a tuned M adam or Witty N) Mac e podded by opiratsrs, RAW ikon wilt a 11.14 loal0n is In Mu of such a Notion, an wry cram Inaoevatar or r) EXTREME CAUTI ON MUST BE EXERCISE D BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR 758 SITE BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REWIRED BY LAW TO NOTIF Y GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST AO HOURS IN ADVANCE AT 851/ 454.0002 . w) Per Gods Mali One -Call T UNA No 130940491, Ma (Moran° *010311 and muNdpW1 wan n oted CITY OF INDEPENDE NCE 703.47 90527 FRONTIER C OMIRSICATIC N3 753882.3514 CENTER POINT ENER GY 80822}2014 MEDIACO M 515.5599032 WRIGHT HE NEPIN COOP 800.778-4110 XCEL ENER GY 812 -030-4388 St. Peter and Paul Cemetery Medina, Minnesota Church St . Pe and of Railway Street Loretto . Mn 55357 Pmf rscin.a) Sma rm Loucks ASS OCIATES m40•g.0.4foono•Y. •1MrSo ••I .1 lea 047. area. f •.4o.. ..A.1 71001rm141M.• • 50. 101 . ..r sow , MN 5610 444 Isack**00.044.11 4011 Cann Ou+lidcmhn , /YOw.w. Fti� OnMwbw T r.r. .a.a .•l l�wwl yK .�w•.�iu w. '"i1.r." S1101S.WSM0WGIT,,c 01411 oh.4 5.1011 Ad/.. .aw 46dydbb ..,5 . I Professio nal SignaWrt 11.004.10. 0,4 •10.40 00, a1n0Mml .w * .114.411..• w> .Y,•r 0.040.1 •0. 40101 I10l4. w.•0* VW 1" fir • %724 li[wr Na 411 2011 .10•PIS 41 412 1 Qua1ity LEMMA ALL • .a. TMB 5-0B-) 3 1 vio ndv ANT) I Shoes Inl et Partial Topographic Survey 1 PM/ 40 No 13-065 1 Short Nn ) 1 OEC00020 TREE y1 CONTOUR Sheet 1 of 1 a. O z 0 U PRA IRIE LAYOU T 600 CONVENTIONAL GRAVES (3.5'x10') MAINTAIN EXISTING GRADES • EXCEPT PROVIDE MINIMAL GRADING AS NEEDED FOR RAIN GARDENS AND INTERNAL DRIVE PRAIRIE SECTI A A REA 1 50SETBA CK PRO PERTYBOUNDA RY / / / / / / // / / // / / / / / / 1 FUTU RE FEA LIRE AREA FU T 1RE FEAT IRE AREA FU IRE FEA LIRE A EA 50' SET BA CK PRA IRIE / FUTURE PRAIRIE THREE RI VERS PARK DISTRICT — J - Q - . - - 1018 1016 NORTH SANDERS WACKER BERGLY INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS 365 Ea st Kellogg Blvd. Saint Pa ul, MN 55101 Phone, (651) 221-0401 Fox : (651) 297-6817 www.swbinc.com SAINT PETER AN D P AUL CEMETERY MEDINA, MINNESOTA I her eby c ertify that thi s plan, specification, or r eperl was prepared by me or und er my direct supervisio n and that a o du -y registered L andscape Ar chitect u nd er the s ows of the St ate of Minn es ota. Signature Date: Reg. Numb er: Project Number: 1026 Draw n By go) Origi nal Issue D at e: 02/20/13 C ONCEPT PLAN SHEET: LO Loretto — St Pater & Pool\Orowingo\12—O912_5P I I 1 I II 1 LY / II 11 e) 7 HAMEL R OAD PROPERTY 1301 50' SETBACK FUTURE CEM ERY EXPANSIO4 1029 50' SETBACK 1026 —------10�,z3 __— --�� FRO�R' iY BUN UAK Y ----tea--- / / 1 ( PRIVATE /> 1 I ( ( (< �a_PtrlFBis�RI�T/ l 1 -EH REF—Ii—WERS I 1 E „/I 11111 II EXISTING CO NDITIO NS ST ORM WATER DETENTION i 7 \\\IItIIII v' 1 ill__, -- ---- i ,/i1/%1111 I � //,111 1 / ,� /J /1 / / i — J / / _.7—'77'"77 /—/ �\ \\\\ / // / / �-- /7 7 7/ / / t/ / / 7/ //_///�/// // // I// // /7 /—'/7 // // // /// / ,7 ,/ ,7 ,/ i/ / / \\ \ PRIVATE N It \\ /// / / /// ////�/j j,11 , � v// //// /////� -1-/-1 /� �7 /,/111((i I I I 1 / /(// 111] / Tl �piIII/IgT1 I 1 , I,lII' ,(///f If1 0' 25' 50' 100' NORTH S AN DERS WACKER BERGLY INC . LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Sai nt Paul, MN 55101 Pho ne: (651) 22'-0401 Fox: (651) 297-6817 www .swb'inc.com S AINT PETER AND PAUL CEMETERY MEDINA, MINNESOTA 1 h ereby c ertify th at this plan, sp ecifi cati on, or report wa s prep ared by me or under my direct s upervision and /h ot11 am a duly r egistered L and scape Architect under the lo ws of the State of Minnesota. SIg nalure Date: Reg. Number: Project Number: 1026 Drawn By: go) 0r;g'onal Is sue D ate: 01/08/13 E XISTIN G CO NDITI ONS SHEET: EC Palar & Paul \Draw ings\1F=001g_YPaP_CCM_L BI1R OA K COMMON HA CKBERRY HAMEL ROAD / \ MOWN WA LKING PAT BUR OAK LA NDSCAPE PLAN BLA CK HILLS SPRUCE PROPERTY BOU NDA RY SUGAR MAPLE 'J FUTIIR AREA .1 SPRI CRA 50SET BA CK SUGAR MAPLE 1 r PROPERTY BOUNDARY \ • COMMON COMMON BUR HACKBERRY HACKBERRY OAK _ , 77- _ _ / \ /' �\ / �\ -/-_----L =—_ SPRING SN OW CRA BAPPLE AUTUMN BLA" MAPLE FUTURE FEATIRE AREA AUTUM N MAPLE LAWN AUTUMN BLAZE M APLE SPRI G SNOW CRABAPPLE / .. .------1 7--• , BUR OA K// / Y �\ COMMON HACKBERRY / / / / / — \� THREE RIVERS / / — — ),—\ PARK DISTRICT f C OMMO N FTA LKBERRY 0 1 1 1 1 1 I++ 1 1 1 1:1/1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! lyi1 I I}/I \( I 111111111111 — T Tr rT kj 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f'1,1 1 1 1 1 1 11111111111111P1111 I1X1BTII' 0 11111111111111 14 1*1 12 x�I 111111 T -� -(-I 1-t 1-H- 1 1 1 1 1 1 0----'--'-- 1018 1016 1 I I 1 1/1 1 111111 1 1 1 I • 1 I 1 /I I I 11/1 I I 11111 _- I I _ - 1 1 1 1 XXSTINc 1 I / \ 5 — . —\_ I I I -4.. ,i1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 71 1 1,,1/5 1 \1 1 1 1 1 A I 1111111 I 1 I I 11111111 III III 1111 I { I I F4ST IIIIIIIII 1111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 11 1I 111 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I_ _ 1 1 1 1 1 1 _- 1 1 1 1 I I I I 111111 111111 III IIIIII 1 1 1 1 I IIII 1 1 1 1 1 / 7- f 1 • III I I 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PLANT SCHEDULE QTY COMMON N AME BOTANIC AL NAME :SIZE 12 AUTUMN IMN BL AZE MAPLE Acer x tremauii Jrll ersred' BARE ROOT OR BB ' 5 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE Picra glauca ' De nsata' • 6' BB 12 BUR OAK Querc us macr orarpa I BARE ROOT OR BB 24 C OM MON HACKBERRY Celtic occideutatlis t BARE ROOT OR BB 24 SPRING S NOW CRABAPPLE Malus 'Spring Snow' ' BARE R OOT OR BB 3 SUGAR MAPLE Ac er sacchar unl BARE ROOT OR BB GENERAL NOTES: GRASSL AND/PR AIRIE ARE A: ALLOW E XIS TIN G GR ASSES TO GROW N ATUR ALLY. PROVIDE PRAIRIE PLANTINGS/SEED MIX IN STRATEGIC LOCATIONS . MOW AS NEEDED TO M AI NTAIN. PRO VIDE RAI N GARDEN PL ANTINGS/SEE D MIX IN PROP OSED R AI N GARDE N DEPRESSIONS. 40' III NORTH SANDERS WACKER BERG LY INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS 365 Ea st Ke llogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 Phone , (6517 221-0401 Fa x: (651) 297-6817 www.swbinc.com SAINTS PETER AND PAUL CEMETERY MEDINA, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plan , specification, or report was prepared by me or u nder my dir ect s upervision and that 1 am a duly r egist ered La nds cape Architect under he lo ws of the State of Minnes ota . Signature Date: Reg. Number: Project Number: 1026 Drawn By g aj Original Iss ue Date: 02/20/13 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET: LS1 AGENDA ITEM : 8 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner DATE: July 2, 2013 MEETING: July 9, 2013 Planning Commission SUBJ: Dennis Hedtke — Rezoning from UH-2 to CH -RR — 3522 Sioux Drive Review Deadline Complete Application Received: June 19, 2013 60 -day Review Deadline: August 19, 2013 Overview of Request Dennis Hedtke has requested a rezoning of property he owns at 3522 Sioux Drive (southeast of Highway 55 and Sioux Drive). The property is currently zoned Uptown Hamel -2 and the applicant has requested that the property be rezoned to Commercial Highway -Railroad, consistent with the property immediate to the west of Sioux Drive. The applicant has operated his business from the property, but is currently listing the property for sale. The applicant believes the CH -RR zoning district is the more appropriate zoning for a potential buyer and development/re-development of the site. Generally, the City reviews rezoning requests within the context of a development proposal, or the City initiates rezonings in order to address changes in policy. However, property owners may also request a rezoning as a stand-alone application as in this case. The regulations for the UH-2 zoning district can be found in Section 834.2 and the regulations for the CH -RR zoning district can be found in Section 838 of the City Code. Analysis The City places property into particular zoning district in order to achieve the goals and policies of the community as reflected in the Comprehensive Plan. The subject property is guided "Mixed Use -Business" in the City's Comprehensive Plan (see excerpt from Future Land Use Map at the top of the following page). The Comp Plan describes this use as follows: Mixed -Use Business (MU -B) provides opportunities for multiple, compatible uses on one site including two or more of the following: residential, general business, commercial, or office. Residential densities in this designation will be between 7.0 units per acre and 45.0 units per acre across the entire area and may include some vertically integrated uses. The mixed -use business areas will be served by urban services. Dennis Hedtke — 3522 Sioux Drive Page 1 of 4 July 9, 2013 Rezoning Planning Commission Meeting Map 5-2 Future Land Use Plan 7// IVIG.LJ11 VK Guide Plan Rural Residential Agriculture Developing -Post 2030 Low Density Res 2.0 - 3.49 U/A Medium Density Res 3.5 - 6.99 U/A High Density Res 7 - 30 U/A Mixed Use 3.5 - 6.99 U/A Mixed Use - Business 7 - 45 U/A Commercial General Business Industrial Business Private Recreation (PREC) M 1 The Comp Plan establishes the following objectives for the land use. Mixed -Use The mixed -use designations focus on integrating a mix of uses to help promote housing and commercial diversity within the community. Such mixed -use designations are concentrated along the TH 55 corridor to promote a more compact development pattern in proximity to existing infrastructure and will include residential and commercial components with ratios of use determined by topography and market conditions. Mixed -use areas are all located in the urban service area. Objectives: 1. Allow a mix of residential and commercial uses to co -exist on adjacent parcels as well as within the same structure or on the same parcel. 2. Create flexible zoning standards that would allow for a mix of residential and commercial uses on parcels that preserve the City's open space and natural features. Dennis Hedtke — 3522 Sioux Drive Page 2 of 4 July 9, 2013 Rezoning Planning Commission Meeting 3. Consider alternatives for meeting parking requirements including parking in the rear of buildings, shared parking, on -street, underground, or ramp parking. 4. Use building standards that enhance and maintain the small town heritage and traditional small-town look including brick facades, traditional street lighting, overhangs over the sidewalk, boardwalks, and the like. 5. Involve residents, businesses, community groups and other stakeholders in the planning of these areas. 6. Create master plans for mixed -use areas to ensure integration of uses and responsiveness to adjacent land uses. 7. Establish design criteria for platting and developing site plans which will be compatible with surrounding physical features, existing land uses and the preservation of ecologically significant natural resources. The subject property is included in the Mixed Use -Business land use, along with the broader area along Hamel Road. However, the property is separated from the larger Mixed Use -Business area by steep topography to the north. The property has been zoned Uptown Hamel since the inception of the UH zoning district in 2001. The sketch plan for UH showed retail/business development in the area. The City included the property within the UH- 2 "sub district" when rezoning property in 2010. The UH-2 district allows smaller -scale retail uses and also allows residential development. However, the UH-2 zoning district does not allow highway -oriented uses. The Hamel Station commercial development to the west of Sioux Drive is guided Commercial in the Comp Plan and was rezoned to CH - RR in 2010. The property immediately to the east is guided Mixed Use -Business and zoned UH- 2. An excerpt from the Zoning Map can be found to the right. SUBJECT SITE Page 3 of 4 Dennis Hedtke — 3522 Sioux Drive July 9, 2013 Rezoning Planning Commission Meeting In determining whether to rezone the property to CH -RR, the City should determine if the proposed zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and achieves the policies and objectives of the City. While most of the property which is guided Mixed Use -Business in the Comprehensive Plan is zoned UH, there are some exceptions. Staff believes that using a series of zoning districts in order to implement the objectives of the Mixed Use land uses is not inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. For example, allowing for a CH -RR zoning district in a portion of the Mixed Use -Business land use and a residential zoning district in another portion of the land use could, together, "allow for a mix of residential and commercial uses to co -exist on adjacent parcels..." If the Planning Commission and City Council decide that both the UH-2 and CH -RR zoning districts could implement the Mixed Use -Business land use, the next thing to consider is which district is the preferable way to carry out the Plan and meet the objectives of the City. As mentioned, the UH-2 zoning district does not generally allow highway -oriented uses. The subject property (along with the property immediately to the east), is in closer proximity to Highway 55 and other highway -oriented commercial development to the west then the remaining Mixed Use -Business land. If the City determines that highway oriented commercial uses are more appropriate, and/or that residential uses are not appropriate, the CH -RR zoning district may be a better fit. As noted above, the property immediately to the east is guided and zoned the same as the subject property. Staff believes zoning the property to the east the same as the subject property may be appropriate. As such, staff contacted the owner of the property to the east and inquired if they had any feedback. The neighboring property owner has indicated that they would support their property being rezoned to the CH -RR zoning district and have requested that the City consider including it within the rezoning ordinance. Review Criteria/Staff Recommendation The City has a great deal of discretion when determining how to zone property because it is a legislative action. As noted in Section 825.35, "amendments shall not be issued indiscriminately but shall only be used as a means to reflect changes in the goals and policies of the community as reflected in the Plan or changes in conditions in the City." If the Planning Commission and City Council determine that the CH -RR zoning district in this location would better meet the objectives of the City and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, staff would recommend approval with the following condition: The applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the rezoning request. Attachments 1. Applicant Narrative Dennis Hedtke — 3522 Sioux Drive Page 4 of 4 July 9, 2013 Rezoning Planning Commission Meeting ragisak crs COMMERCIAL REALTY SOLUTIONS WY../ cam June 27, 2013 Mr. Dusty Finke City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 RE: Re -zoning request for Hedtke Property, 3522 Sioux Dr. Medina, MN. Dear Dusty; The Dennis Hedtke Property located at 3522 Sioux Dr. Medina is currently zoned Uptown Hamel - District 2. The purpose of that Zoning, as stated in Section 834, is to create a distinctive Uptown Hamel area that is attractive, pedestrian — friendly, mixed -use town center, by using building facades, porches, walkways, landscaped plazas, lighting, signage, landscaping and parking to blend retail, office, higher -density housing, specialty shops and gathering spots into a unified and viable community. That purpose and description does not fit the Hedtke property. The property is located on the SE corner of Hwy 55 and Sioux Dr. and is definitely better suited for a Commercial - Highway Zoning. We are requesting a Commercial Highway / Railroad zoning as the Railroad Tracks are just south of the property. We are requesting the zoning change at this time as we do not want to have a potential purchaser and then have a contingency in the purchase agreement of rezoning. This zoning is consistent to the zoning for the West Financial Property, which is located on the west side of Sioux Dr. Which is directly across Sioux Dr. from the Hedtke Property. Thank you for considering this request. Please let me know if you have any questions. 763-229-4982. Sincerely; Commercial Realty Solutions Wayne Elam President 3 Highway 55 West, Buffalo, MN 55313 cell 763 229 4982 office 763 682 2400 fax 763 682 4524 www.commrealtysolutions.com 1 AGENDA ITEM : 9 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231 .2555 Facsimile: 763.231 .2561 planners@nacplanning.corr PLANNING REPORT TO: Medina Planning Commission Scott Johnson, City Administrator FROM: Nate Sparks DATE: July 2, 2013 RE: Medina — Fawn Meadows Rezoning CITY FILE: LR-13-105 Application Date: April 12, 2013 Review Deadline: August 10, 2013 (extended) BACKGROUND / SUMMARY OF REQUEST Money Tree Holdings LLC has made an application for a rezoning and preliminary plat for a proposed development referred to as "Fawn Meadows" located on a piece of property adjacent to the subject site of the Reserve of Medina preliminary plat. The preliminary plat application for Fawn Meadows is incomplete pending additional wetland information. However, the applicant is requesting the rezoning application to be processed. In order to meet statutory deadlines for the City to act on the rezoning request, staff is presenting the rezoning request on its own. The applicant is seeking to have the property rezoned from Rural Residential -Urban Reserve to R-1, Single Family Residential. SUBJECT SITE The property is a vacant parcel with no road frontage. It is located west of County Road 116 and south of Hackamore Road. The site is currently vacant and contains farmland in the south and a large wetland to the north. A remnant of wooded area is located upslope from the wetland. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan identifies the parcel as being guided for a Low Density Residential land use. This requires a minimum density of 2 units per acre up to 3.49 units per acre. This is the same land use classification as the Reserve of Medina preliminary plat (see map at the top of the following page). PROPOSED REZONING The applicant had initially sought the rezoning as part of the approval process for a preliminary plat application. The preliminary plat application is not complete and is pending further information. The applicant is seeking a review of the rezoning request alone. This would change the zoning from a rural class of Rural Residential -Urban Reserve to an urban class of R-1 Single Family Residential. As RR-UR the property could be used in the interim basis with a t HACKAMORE SUBJECT PROPERTY Map 5-2 MEDINA Future Land Use Plan Guide Plan Rural Residential Agriculture Developing -Post 2030 Low Density Res 2.0 - 3.49 U/A septic system and well as a rural property with the proper access. With the rezoning the property could only be put to use as urban residential in a manner conforming to the Comprehensive Plan. No sewer permits may be granted to this property until it is divided in a manner consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. The main purpose of the R1 zoning district is to "implement the objectives of the Low Density Residential land use in the city's Comprehensive Plan." APPLICATION REVIEW Generally speaking, the City may rezone property in a manner that is conforming to the Comprehensive Plan provided the action isn't injurious to other properties or otherwise detrimental to the general area. This property is located within a current development stage and is adjacent to property that is also being rezoned. While it is somewhat uncommon for the City to rezone property without an accompanying development plan, it may be an acceptable practice in instances like this. The City has a great deal of discretion when determining how to zone property because it is a legislative action. As noted in Section 825.35, "amendments shall not be issued indiscriminately but shall only be used as a means to reflect changes in the goals and policies of the community as reflected in the Plan or changes in conditions in the City." RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the rezoning. ATTACHMENT: Applicant Narrative 2 4 ENGINEERING I SURVEYING I ENVIRONMENTAL I PLANNING Rezoning and Preliminary Plat — Fawn Meadows On behalf of Money Tree Holdings LLC, we are pleased to present to the City of Medina our preliminary plat and development plans for Fawn Meadows— a 13 lot residential subdivision. In conjunction with the preliminary plat approval, Fawn Meadows is also requesting the proposed land be rezoned from rural residential/urban reserve to R-1 — consistent with City's future land use plan. The preliminary plat plan meets the required minimum density for the property, 2.0 units per acre, which is consistent with the City's Future Land Use Map Low Density Residential, The proposed density for the site — based on the approximate wetland line — is 2.27 units per acre. This development will obtain access from Foxglove Trail as proposed by Toll Brothers, Inc. as part of The Reserve of Medina. The property also maintains direct access to County Road 116 through an existing 33 foot access easement along the north edge of The Reserve of Medina. Fawn Meadows proposes to use this easement access, along with an additional 17 feet of dedicated R -O -W to provide access for Lots 5 & 6, Block 1. The City of Medina is proposing to construct a trunk sanitary sewer adjacent to the wetland along the back sides of Lots 1- 7, Block 2 to serve the east portion of The Reserve of Medina. It is our understanding this sanitary sewer main will provide direct service for Lots 1-7, Block 2. As part of the City design process, they will provide wetland delineation for our site and adjacent properties, along with a tree removal / replacement plan associated with the sewer construction. As such, although the Fawn Meadows preliminary plat plans provide a tree preservation / replacement plan and calculation, no additional tree replacement is proposed on our landscape plan at this time. Further, we understand that final site design for the City's sanitary sewer project will require some coordination with the development plans for Fawn Meadows, particularly related to tree removal, retaining wall placement and pond design. We look forward to creating this new neighborhood for the City of Medina to complement the many fine neighborhoods in the City. We stand available to answer any questions or issues you may have now and in the future. Please contact Dave Nash at EVS if you have any questions regarding the submitted preliminary plans and plat for Fawn Meadows. Thank you. Dave Nash, PE EVS, Inc. I Director of Residential Development Direct: (952) 646-0253 I Ce11: (612) 242-0530 dnash@evs-eng.com APR 1 2 2013 'I EVS 110250 Valley View Rd., Suite 1231 Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3534' Phone: 952.646.02361 Fax: 952.646.02901 www.evs•eng.com G 1 t v 6 A Comment Card MEDINA Name of Speaker: ,.Ja ) afro. k/ Public Forum Agenda Item Gv;1l (ple-ase nt) Address: 333 �' jsin e pri�/If Telephone (optional): Representing: Agenda Item (list number and letter): Comments: que (J o''1 0,, how prone'f `S c7opp or IrNA.. • U Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes O R S VC. Comment Card MEDINA Name of Speaker: le / �JRJ c ,\/\_ Public Forum Agenda Item �,a 7 se rfo Address: y t) w` Telephone (optional): Representing: / V Q lei v Agenda Item (list number and letter): ¶M (Q Comments: cg 44-itAAtrAlta--v Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes G , Ty MEDINA Name of Speaker: (it - 3 Comment Card Public Forum Agenda Item ,N'1 A L jv �G /z.t.J N` rl n 4, ( easeprint)Address: CC(`s'1 �ti C I-1 L %2 A l ., l Telephone (optional): Representing: Agenda Item (list Comments: number and letter): 7;1 /nE- — 1 t c j i1 4 ) lAi ILL L `) 13/5 %EL/ L--i_ ' t,; t- 0, t(l ,` Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes G, T Y O A Comment Card Public Forum Agenda Item MEDINA Name of Speaker: lJ �d� ReY �ef (please print) Address: 64-1,4 \i urti-:eN/ )ift W Telephone (optional): 1 r 3-41 07V' Representing: a -t_ Agenda Item (list number and letter): 6 Comments: '1l h s Vp`tt •0( Ci+rai 1 ' L k rr-- -46 pVO r a -C-- ` *ej 3 ,4 h ( Y h (24 k i' -ti. V U ,0o Aeu AS A FJ 1, La >ta k;� clik. ���F .,Jd I? 1 ' WI? Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes