Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout11-13-2012MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY NOVEMBER 13, 2012 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL (2052 County Road 24) 1. Call to Order 2. Public Comments on items not on the agenda 3. Update from City Council proceedings 4. Planning Department Report 5. Approval of October 9th and 24th of 2012 draft Planning Commission minutes. 6. Public Hearing — Mattamy Homes requests a Preliminary Plat and Rezoning for a 65 lot residential subdivision to be located north of Highway 55 and east of Arrowhead Drive (PID 02-118- 23-34-0002). 7. Council Meeting Schedule 8. Adjourn POSTED IN CITY HALL November 9, 2012 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Crosby and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: October 31, 2012 SUBJ: Planning Department Updates November 7, 2012 City Council Meeting Ordinance Updates A) Wind Turbine/Renewable Energy Ordinance — The City Council enacted a moratorium on Wind Energy Conversion Systems (WECS) at the June 5 meeting and authorized a study on the matter. Staff has studied the existing regulations and prepared a report and potential ordinance amendment. The Planning Commission reviewed at their July 10, August 13, and September 11 meetings and provided direction, including direction to remove WECS from the list of uses allowed in residential districts. The Council reviewed at the September 18th meeting, and expressed interest in allowing small turbines within rural residential property, with various limitations. The ordinance will be presented to the Council at the November 7 meeting. B) Lot Frontage/Flag Lots/Driveway regulations — Staff intends to study the City's regulations related to flag lots and frontage requirements as well as driveway setback requirements. Any tentative changes are tentatively scheduled to be discussed with the Planning Commission at their December meeting. Land Use Application Reviews A) Moser Variance — Jacob Moser has requested variances in order to construct a home on an existing vacant parcel in the Independence Beach Area (east of Ardmore Ave at the intersection of Balsam St. Requested variances are from the setback requirements from the ordinary high water level of Lake Ardmore, the front property line, and from an unused right-of-way. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at the October 24 Planning Commission meeting, recommended that the applicant alter their plans to reduce the size of the home/garage and tabled the application to allow them to update plans B) Fields of Medina West — north of Highway 55, east of Arrowhead — Mattamy Homes has applied for a preliminary plat for 65 single-family homes located on the 20 acres west of the Fields of Medina project currently under construction. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and a Public Hearing may be scheduled for the November 13 Planning Commission meeting. C) Tamarack Ridge Preliminary Plat — Property Resources Development Co. has submitted a preliminary plat for an eight lot rural subdivision on approximately 80 gross acres northwest of the existing Deerhill Road between Willow Drive and Homestead. The applicant is contesting the suitable soils map as part of the application. Staff has determined that the application is incomplete for review and awaits additional information before scheduling a Public Hearing at a Planning Commission meeting. D) Buckley Wind Energy Conversion System (WECS) CUP — 1582 Homestead Trail — Hanna Buckley has applied for a CUP to construct a 189 -foot wind turbine on their property and the application is incomplete for review at this time. The City Council has established a Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 November 7, 2012 City Council Meeting moratorium on the review, approval and construction of WECS and authorized a study on the City's regulations of this use. Review of the CUP cannot proceed until the moratorium expires. E) Woods of Medina Concept Plan, Toll Brothers — Toll Brothers have submitted a concept plan for review for a 125 -lot single-family subdivision on the Gorman Farm property east of County Road 116 and south of Hackamore. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at the October 9 meeting and provided comments. The City Council reviewed and provided comment at the October 16 meeting. Staff will await an application for preliminary plat. Additional Projects A) Business Tours —I attended the business tours at Rolling Green Business Center, Target, and the Medina Entertainment Center and was able to discuss concerns and answer questions related to future projects on two of the properties. B) Zoning Enforcement — staff has investigated two commercial activities occurring on residential property without relevant approvals and the operations appeared to have ceased. Staff will continue to monitor.\ C) Meeting with Corcoran re: Hackamore — staff met with City of Corcoran staff related to future improvements of Hackamore Road and how these can be integrated into development within both cities. Staff was also collecting information for a traffic study which will be conducted for the Woods of Medina project. D) Cable Infrastructure Analysis — staff conducted a quick analysis to determine how many miles of cable would be necessary to serve areas of Medina which currently are not served by cable TV/high speed interne. Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 November 7, 2012 City Council Meeting 1 CITY OF MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION 2 DRAFT Meeting Minutes 3 Tuesday, October 9, 2012 4 5 6 1. Call to Order: Commissioner Charles Nolan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 7 8 Present: Planning Commissioners Robin Reid, V. Reid, Charles Nolan and John 9 Anderson. 10 11 Absent: Randy Foote, Kent Williams and Kathleen Martin 12 13 Also Present: City Planner Dusty Finke, Planning Assistant Debra Peterson, and 14 NAC Consultant Nate Sparks. 15 16 2. Public Comments on items not on the agenda 17 18 No public comments. 19 20 3. Update from City Council proceedings 21 22 Finke updated the Commission on recent activities and decisions by the City Council. 23 24 4. Planning Department Report 25 26 Finke provided an update of upcoming Planning projects. 27 28 5. Approval of the September 11, 2012 Draft Planning Commission meeting 29 minutes. 30 31 Motion by V. Reid, seconded by R. Reid, to approve the September 11, 2012 32 minutes as written. Motion carried unanimously. (Absent: Foote, Martin and 33 Williams) 34 35 36 6. Public Hearing - Toll Brothers, Inc. - Requests Concept Plan Review of 125 37 single family residential homes on an 80 acre parcel located east of County Road 38 116 and south of Hackamore Road known as the Gorman Farm property (PID 39 01-118-23-21-0004). 40 41 Finke presented the application describing the application to have Single family 42 homes and zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. He further explained all the 43 processes the applicant would have to go through as part of the Preliminary Plat, such 44 as Wetland impacts subject to WCA, tree replacement/landscape plans, parks and 45 trails. 46 47 Finke explained the Comprehensive Plan for a park within a half a mile of each 48 household. Anderson asked why the Park Commission decided against requiring a 1 1 park for this development. Finke said because surrounding developments have 2 private amenities, he didn't feel it was necessary. 3 4 Nolan asked about trees to be removed. Finke said a significant amount of trees 5 would be removed as part of grading the site and to provide drainage needed. R. Reid 6 asked why all the trees weren't shown on the concept plan at the Northwest corner/lot 7 line. Nolan asked staff to make sure this information is shown in the future. 8 Anderson said the applicant is proposing 125 single family homes and asked if there 9 was any discussion of townhomes. Finke said not that he is aware of, but he could 10 ask the applicant. 11 12 Nolan asked about the one access point for the property to the north accessed out onto 13 116. Finke said that staff would not be recommending direct access out onto 116. 14 15 Nolan asked about the proposed filling of wetlands. Finke said at this stage the 16 applicant has talked about purchasing credits, but would have to go through the 17 technical process with the watershed. Nolan said the areas of that impact would be 18 three wetlands. Finke concurred. Nolan said the plan (C4.01) with the grading lines 19 appears to have a lot of encroachments within the buffer and was curious about it. 20 Finke explained restoration and planning of all wetlands would be necessary as part 21 of the platting process. He concurs it appears to have encroachments. 22 23 V. Reid asked Finke to define the outline of the wetland area. Anderson asked Finke 24 to reference on the map where the Park Commission disagreed concerning trail 25 location. Finke showed a trail along the internal roadway and woods. He said the 26 Park Commission was in favor of trails along Hackamore. 27 28 Alex Martin of Toll Brothers gave their company background and the six locations 29 they are currently located. Toll Brothers is a National builder but they predominantly 30 deal with the high end luxury group. He said it would be similar to the Wild 31 Meadows South, except for the stormwater management. They are a custom builder 32 and keep a keen eye on streetscape with continuity and aesthetics. He explained the 33 plans before the Commission are not Engineer drawn. He said they held a 34 neighborhood meeting last week and is working with approximately 30 people, 35 though over 400 people were notified of the project. 36 37 Nolan asked the applicant about stormwater and he explained. Anderson asked if 38 they owned the property or if under contract. Martin said it's under contract. 39 40 Anderson asked if the applicant had considered townhomes. Martin said the Wayzata 41 school district has done well over the downturn in the market. He said homes are 42 selling in the Single family residences and they gear their plans based on the market. 43 44 V. Reid asked if they had developments that just had open space rather than park 45 amenities. Martin said yes they have done such. Martin said they look at developing 46 communities rather than just homes. 47 48 R. Reid said her other concern is traffic and understands a study would be required. 49 She asked how they deal with the study. Martin explained they would complete a 50 study involving all necessary agencies. Also, trips per household are also considered. 2 1 He said a lot of it is a Partnership, and then blindly going with what they think is 2 right. 3 4 R. Reid asked why the northwest corner stand of trees isn't shown on the concept 5 plan. Martin said he wasn't sure. Martin said the seclusion of the trees is wonderful 6 and to preserve the trees is important. 7 8 Martin said the site doesn't work for townhomes based on market, location, and price 9 points. 10 11 Nolan asked about the 500 year flood location. Finke explained it appears that the 12 location isn't accurate and said the City doesn't regulate the 500 year floodplain. 13 14 R. Reid said we have a few concepts of the exterior elevations and wondered if they 15 will have a variety of homes. Martin said they would provide more styles than what 16 is shown. He said in Eden Prairie they have five styles with five additional exterior 17 appearances. He said custom fronts are important and they don't allow the same floor 18 plan and exterior elevation next to each other or across the street. Nolan asked if they 19 would be actively marketing five different floor plans. 20 21 Public Hearing opened at 7:58 p.m. 22 23 Derek Hayes, 295 Calamus Circle in Wild Meadows, said what attracted many of us 24 was the nature preserve, so they bought 120-150 acres around their development. He 25 feels it is a true asset to both Wild Meadows owners and the City. He feels taking 26 away almost 50 feet of trees along property lines would take away their privacy and 27 investment they've put into the area. They want to be able to maintain their privacy. 28 They are also interested in understanding the water plan for this development. Many 29 of them have invested substantial amounts of dollars to make drainage work correctly 30 and drain tiles were built approximately five years ago along the tree lines which have 31 since resolved their drainage and flooding issues. 32 33 Bob Kroll of 315 Calamus Circle said the association had to run a major drain tile in 34 the wooded area along the east property line of the proposed development. He said 35 they had problems with flooding in their back yards, but now are not having issues 36 since drain tiles were installed. He said the proposed trail goes right into his back 37 yard without any potential for a connection. He disagrees with putting in a trail for 38 the future that leads to nowhere. He is opposed to cutting trees down for such a trail. 39 He is also worried about the safety of others with such a trail since it will only attract 40 teenagers, especially if it dead ends. 41 42 Anderson asked about when the flooding occurred. Bob said about five years ago and 43 flooding came close to their homes and was killing out some of the trees, which were 44 reduced about 50% due to that flooding and then to take out more trees now would be 45 considerable. 46 47 Nolan asked where the natural drainage flows. Finke said it appears to flow towards 48 the wetlands, but would be better clarified once engineering plans are provided. 49 3 1 Kirby Johnson of 320 Calamus Circle said he's getting a lot of input from neighbors. 2 He is concerned with the possible trail and that Wild Meadows North has recently 3 paid $120,000 to put limestone on their trails which are "private." He said the 4 applicant appears to be marketing a joint neighborhood with them and they are 5 "private." He said he thinks the new development will need a place to walk their 6 dogs so that they don't think they can come into Wild Meadows trails which are 7 posted, but could lead to complaints and police calls. He thinks the new development 8 should have its own trail system. 9 10 Joe Cavanaugh has a 10 acre piece just north of the development. He said he gave 11 Finke a new design of the land and wanted to say he supports the project. 12 13 Jill Voltin of 630 Shawnee Woods Trail said one of their concerns is if the park 14 doesn't happen would more homes be constructed? Martin said if the park goes away 15 then they would be below the minimum density and they would have to build homes. 16 She said they have a very high water table and some of their homes have sump pumps 17 constantly running. She said the water is holding in the woods. Voltin also asked if a 18 hydrologist report had been done. Alex Martin said soils tests have been done and he 19 said once it's complete they would submit the report to the City and it would become 20 public record. 21 22 Eric Voltin of 630 Shawnee Woods Road said that he wondered if the fact that Wild 23 Meadows flooding got better around the same time that his neighborhood started 24 having more issues were related. He said every time it happens they continue to lose 25 trees. He said the way the homes are shown now along the southern property lines 26 they'd be cutting very close to the lot line when cutting trees. He asked if it would be 27 possible to save the trees, or offer the strip of tree line to sell to the people along the 28 south side to save them. He said the Open House said Toll has standards on silt fence 29 around tree lines and asked if the City had separate standards. 30 31 Steven Theesfeld of 600 Shawnee Woods Trail said his property sits where the trail is 32 proposed to end. He said he knows you can't stop development, but most of them 33 bought these properties years ago because of the rural nature and preservation of the 34 trees. He said he likes the idea of the City giving the developer a park credit since it 35 could help preserve the wooded area along their property lines. He further explained 36 it is his property that the trail dead ends at, which is right next to his septic mound. 37 He said he envisions kids playing on his property, since the trail dead ends there and 38 said they bought into the neighborhood for privacy so therefore the idea isn't 39 appealing. He said his deed doesn't show an easement for a trail. Theesfeld also 40 brought up concerns with the bus stop along 116 and cars not stopping for busses. He 41 said the road really isn't ready for another development. It seems our quest for 42 development is ahead of us being ready. He said he remembers the Swanson 43 proposal in the past was told by the County, "no more access points on 116." He is 44 also concerned about the kids getting on the bus at that stop. Theesfeld asked the 45 Commission to take the time to give the County time to address issues. He invited 46 anyone that was interested to come to his home to see the water issues, woods, and 47 location of dead end trail proposal. 48 49 Nolan asked about access onto 116 and Hackamore. Finke said a traffic study would 50 be done. 4 1 2 Heather Czech of 660 Shawnee Woods Road said her concern is drainage, trees, road 3 access, 116, and privacy. She said their taxes have doubled, but they love the 4 Wayzata schools and the community. She agrees development marches on and feels 5 the unique nature is the high water table. She said it's the excavation that will impact 6 the drainage and tree lines. Czech asked if it would be possible to have deeper lots 7 along the southern south side. A letter was submitted with all neighborhood 8 signatures. 9 10 Nolan encouraged the applicant to work with neighbors. 11 12 Jim Burkstrand of 4475 Maple Leaf Court resides in Foxberry Farms development. 13 He said he was the 5`h home constructed in Foxberry Farms and lives on Maple Leaf 14 Court and explained that if the proper protection is put in around the trees they could 15 be saved. He said the trees in his yard when under construction were done properly 16 and they didn't lose any trees; so if the builder pays attention to it they'll be fine. He 17 said his main concern is County Road 116 and the Fields of Medina development to 18 the west. He said this can't be discussed as a single issue. He thinks the speed limit 19 should be reduced and an additional stop light put in. 20 21 Weir said the City doesn't have jurisdiction over speed limits. 22 23 Dale and Judy Gronberg of 565 Hackamore Road were in attendance. He said he was 24 unable to attend the neighborhood meeting and hasn't been part of any development 25 talks. He is wondering how this is going to affect him in the future. He discussed 26 further concerning road improvements and water, with his main concern being 27 possible assessments. He is currently on a well and septic and is wondering if they 28 would have to put a lift station on the east end. He feels like the odd man out since 29 there is no real plan for development along Hackamore Road. He feels he is at a 30 disadvantage based on sewer and water. He asked about the trail and Finke explained 31 the City would meet with property owners when the time comes. Gronberg also 32 wondered if this new development would change his ability to build a new home on 33 his property and feels it could. He is located on the second lot to the west of the 34 entrance along Hackamore. He said he gets substantial drainage from Wild Meadows 35 since they made their improvements. He once had ducks nesting in his yard but then 36 the City installed culverts which he paid for and it has since resolved his drainage 37 issues. 38 39 Nolan asked the applicant if they approached the property owner along Hackamore 40 between the proposed park and entrance into the development. The property owner, 41 Marilyn Larson said was never approached. 42 43 Denny of 625 Hackamore Road asked if a study determines an upgrade is needed on 44 Hackamore who would pay for it. Finke said another significant development across 45 from Hackamore to the north in Corcoran is also being considered and a traffic study 46 would consider both. Denny asked if Toll Brothers would be required to install a lift 47 station. Finke said the goal would be to hold it as deep as possible through gravity so 48 there would be no need for a lift station. 49 5 1 Matt Denault the Civil Engineer for Toll Brothers explained he's done a preliminary 2 analysis on whether a lift station would be needed and thinks they won't need one. 3 Their intent is to run a gravity sewer, with potential to serve others outside of the 4 development. 5 6 Harry Denny of 625 Hackamore Road asked if a lift station was planned. The 7 Engineer for Toll said they were going to try and run the lines deep enough to get 8 gravity so they wouldn't need a lift station. Denny asked if the proposed 9 development would stop them from being able to put a new septic system in on their 10 property. Finke said current properties can continue to maintain and install new 11 septic systems. They explained they want to sell their property now as a five acre 12 parcel and wondered if they would be able to put in a new septic. Finke said the 13 property can have the house torn down and rebuilt. He explained the Toll application 14 wouldn't preclude him from any of his rights or selling his property. 15 16 Marilyn Larson of 435 Hackamore said her concern is the drainage. She said 17 drainage has come from the Wild Meadows development and the City hasn't done 18 anything about it. The ditches aren't deep enough. She likes the park along the side 19 of her property. Nolan explained if the issue is from Wild Meadows then it's a 20 private issue. He said sometimes there are ways of alleviating the problem by talking 21 to the developer. 22 23 Martin said the Gorman property is one of the higher points. 24 25 Jeff Pederson of 710 Shawnee Woods Road said he echoes what his neighbors are 26 concerned with and he has a road at the back of his property. He said he's 50 feet 27 from the back property line and asked if the developer would consider a fence. 28 29 Public Hearing closed at 8:56 p.m. 30 31 Nolan explained this is a conceptual plan to provide the City with feedback. There is 32 no real formal vote tonight. 33 34 V. Reid said it is clear that there is a major drainage problem. She stated that the 35 applicant needs to save more trees and that she would support credit for a private park 36 and a larger play area. She said that the park doesn't need to have amenities, but just 37 an area to run and play. She said she is the only one on the Commission that lives in 38 a planned development. She said she has four sons that like to play soccer and thinks 39 that kids should not have to cross County Road 116 and should have their own play 40 area. She thinks there should be a comp plan amendment to allow for higher density. 41 She stated that traffic is a major problem on County Road 116 now and will only get 42 worse increasing households with Hwy 55 so close. She said it is faster to go to 43 County Road 116 even if there are major backups. 44 45 Anderson agrees with V. Reid and with the drainage. She said hearing from all the 46 neighbors provides evidence and appears to be an issue which needs to be addressed. 47 Martin said he feels all parties need to come together to discuss drainage problems. 48 The owner between the park and the entrance said she's been here since 1979 and the 49 field used to be planted and now it isn't. 50 6 1 Finke suggested the attendees contact their Commissioner to help with stop lights and 2 road improvements and get organized. 3 4 R. Reid asked the purpose of the ghost plat of the property to the north near 116. 5 Finke said to look into the future. Would like to see the streets curve a little more and 6 it has a long straight away. Alex Martin said it was his first comment to want the 7 same. R. Reid explained that the City wants to preserve trees. Martin said that is 8 what they want also. R. Reid asked the name of the development in Eden Prairie and 9 was told it was "Eden Prairie Woods." 10 11 Nolan said he tends to favor the Commission and their recommendations such as the 12 Park Commission, because they've studied it more regionally. He said the Planning 13 Commissioners typically tend to also lean that way. He said as far as the trail is 14 concerned, if the Park Commission doesn't see value in it then more than likely they 15 wouldn't favor it. He would like to see more creativity as a general rule. A 16 serpentine road is more desirable and he would like the applicant to think outside of 17 the box a little more. He also isn't sure about the multifamily part of it. He's only 18 partially sympathetic since the City would like to see a little more variety of housing 19 types. He explained the Metropolitan Council regulates density, so if the City allows 20 lesser density then we would have to see it made up somewhere else. He said he 21 would still like the applicant to look at a variety of housing with higher density in at 22 least one area. 23 24 Pederson's main concern is the road location and is studying it on his own and Nolan 25 felt would be better. 26 27 Nolan was concerned with the length of the southern road. He also mentioned the 28 issue of the traffic and asked Finke about it and how much the City would coordinate 29 that. Finke said they don't have any pending applications, but he has started 30 conversations with Corcoran. 31 32 Nolan asked the applicant to look at the water from more of a regional perspective. 33 The City should encourage the neighbors and applicant to get involved in resolving 34 the drainage issues. 35 36 V. Reid said she wants to reiterate her support for a park which she feels builds a 37 community. She doesn't like the location on the plan for a park, but would rather 38 have it as an area that serves the kids. 39 40 Alex Martin said they would have another Neighborhood Open House that will be 41 hosted on -site and encouraged attendance. He said they want to be good neighbors. 42 Finke said the application would go to the City Council next Tuesday. 43 44 7. Public Hearing — Jacob Moser — Requests Variances to construct a 45 new home in the Urban Residential (UR) zoning district along 46 Ardmore Avenue (PID 18-118-23-24-0154). 47 48 No Quorum, so item was not heard. The Commission discussed a 49 Special meeting on October 24, 2012 if a quorum could be met, 7 1 otherwise it would be heard at the Planning Commission's regular 2 November meeting. The new date to hear the application would be 3 emailed to those individuals providing their email address and all 4 property owners within required distance for notification. 5 6 Motion by Anderson, seconded by V. Reid, to postpone the public hearing. 7 Motion carried unanimously. (Absent: Foote, Martin and Williams) 8 9 Dusty will be sending an email to the Planning Commission concerning options 10 for a Special meeting date which will work for at least four of the commissioners. 11 12 8. Public Hearing — Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 8, Section 825, of the 13 Medina City Code related to Variances. 14 15 Finke presented the application and explained that the ordinance would be bringing 16 our existing ordinance in line with State Statute. He said the language is similar to 17 State Statute, but has included further description beyond the reasonable test. He said 18 the City can determine who is the City Board of Adjustments and Appeals makes the 19 decision. Weir said it is most appropriate to have it be the City Council, since they 20 are the elected body. 21 22 Nolan asked about a legal answer to what "the plight of the landowner is due to 23 circumstances unique to the property, not created by the landowner" means. 24 25 Weir asked about the "hearing" change on top of page two of the recommended draft 26 ordinance. Agreed to keep "hearing" and not change to "public hearing." 27 28 Public Hearing opened at 9:46 p.m. 29 30 Public Hearing closed at 9:47 p.m. 31 32 Motion by R. Reid, seconded by V. Reid, to recommend approval of the 33 Ordinance Amendment with noted changes. Motion carried unanimously. 34 (Absent: Foote, Martin and Williams) 35 36 9. Public Hearing - Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 8, Section 833, of the 37 Medina City Code related to Public Buildings in the Industrial Park District. 38 39 Finke presented application. Anderson asked if under certain circumstances other 40 businesses should be allowed. 41 42 V. Reid asked if the idea came from the Council. Finke said there was some interest 43 by Council to find less expensive alternatives. 44 45 V. Reid doesn't like the idea at all, but does have concern about the cost. She would 46 like to know what the screening is going to look like, such as huge pine trees. She 47 recommended that language be added to the ordinance. If tightened up, language 48 would support it. 49 8 1 Public Hearing opened at 10:02 p.m. 2 3 Public Hearing closed at 10:02 p.m. 4 5 Motion by Anderson, seconded by R. Reid, to recommend approval of the 6 Ordinance Amendment with changes noted, specifically related to screening. 7 Motion carried unanimously. (Absent: Foote, Martin, and Williams) 8 9 10. Council Meeting Schedule 10 11 R. Reid agreed to attend the October 16th City Council meeting 12 13 11. Adjourn 14 15 Motion by Anderson, seconded by V. Reid, to adjourn at 10:05 p.m. Motion 16 carried unanimously. (Absent: Foote, Martin, & Williams) 9 1 CITY OF MEDINA 2 PLANNING COMMISSION 3 DRAFT Special Meeting Minutes 4 Wednesday, October 24, 2012 5 6 7 1. Call to Order: Commissioner Charles Nolan called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. 8 9 Present: Planning Commissioners Robin Reid, Kathleen Martin, V. Reid, Charles 10 Nolan, John Anderson and Randy Foote 11 12 Absent: Kent Williams 13 14 Also Present: City Planner Dusty Finke and NAC Consultant Nate Sparks. 15 16 2. Public Comments on items not on the agenda 17 18 No public comments. 19 20 3. Public Hearing — Jacob Moser — Requests Variances to construct a 21 new home in the Urban Residential (UR) zoning district along 22 Ardmore Avenue (PID 18-118-23-24-0154). 23 24 Commissioner R. Reid recused herself from the discussion on this matter. 25 26 Sparks presented the staff report. He listed the five variances being requested: 1) 27 Front setback (15 feet instead of 30); 2) Palm Street setback (15 feet instead of 30); 3) 28 Setback from ordinary high water level of Lake Ardmore (55 feet instead of 75 feet); 29 4) Upland Buffer Setback (10 feet instead of 15 feet); 5) Minimum lot size (18,000 30 sq. ft. instead of 20,000 sq. ft.). Sparks stated that the applicant proposed to bring in 31 approximately 400-500 yards of fill in order to construct a two-story walkout home 32 with approximately 900 square feet per level. He stated that the fill was intended so 33 that the home sat above the street in order to help with drainage from the water 34 coming from neighboring properties and City streets. Sparks noted that if all of the 35 setback requirements were applied to the lot, there would be a very small building 36 envelope of approximately 400 square feet, which would not meet the minimum size 37 standard the City has established for a home. He stated that the applicant would need 38 to replace a 54 inches of trees and to plant a vegetative upland buffer. He 39 summarized the variance criteria for consideration and stated that staff believed that 40 the request met the criteria, although the Commission may wish to discuss the matter 41 of height. 42 43 Anderson inquired about fill brought in for the 2992 Ardmore driveway. 44 1 1 Sparks replied that they didn't have a survey to calculate, but the survey showed the 2 house pad raised approximately six feet. Finke stated that the retaining wall on the 3 property was a pretty good indicator of where the original grade was located. 4 5 V. Reid inquired about the Palm Street right-of-way. She stated that from the letters, 6 neighbors use the right-of-way. She questioned what the City's position was on for 7 the use for a driveway. 8 9 Sparks stated that, if the City Council determines to allow the driveway within the 10 right-of-way, staff would recommend a license with conditions that would maintain 11 access for the public. This may include a fence or hedge in order to prevent further 12 use of the right-of-way. 13 14 V. Reid inquired if the City has ever denied an application for a variance which left a 15 lot unbuildable. 16 17 Sparks stated that he was not aware of such a case in Medina and that doing so may 18 create a concern of a taking. 19 20 Nolan inquired if the City would be interested in vacating the right-of-way, as it 21 seems it would increase the buildable property. 22 23 Sparks stated that staff did discuss this matter and wanted to maintain the right -of - 24 way for various purposes, including maintaining access for the public and the City to 25 Lake Ardmore and the stream connecting to Lake Independence. Finke added that 26 there was a potential for the right-of-way to be used for stormwater management 27 when streets are reconstructed in the neighborhood. 28 29 Martin inquired how many variances were required. Sparks stated that there were 4. 30 31 Martin inquired if there were other variances in the neighborhood. 32 33 Sparks stated that the nearest that staff could find in the files was the property three to 34 the north which were very similar to what is being requested in this case. He noted 35 that there are large numbers of variances on other streets in Independence Beach for 36 additions and reconstructions, and that many of the other existing homes would be 37 considered non -conforming. 38 39 Martin inquired about the criteria related to whether the variance is consistent with 40 the Comprehensive Plan. 41 42 Sparks stated that the use of the property as a single-family home is consistent with 43 the Comp Plan. He also noted that the City will require compliance with its 44 environmental ordinances, which maintains consistency with the Comp Plan. 45 2 1 Martin inquired what the minimum required size of home by building and zoning 2 code. She said she is struggling to balance the extent of the variances against the 3 minimum which is required to be constructed. 4 5 Sparks replied that the minimum is a house that is 24x24 with habitable space at least 6 550 square feet. A garage of 440 square feet is also required. 7 8 Jacob Moser stated that he has owned the property for 7 years. He wanted to place a 9 house that is similar to other house in the neighborhood and meets their needs. 10 11 Public Hearing opened at 7:57 p.m. 12 13 Dave Raskob (2864 Ardmore, builder working with applicant) stated that he has lived 14 in the neighborhood for 27 years and built 7 homes. He stated that Mr. Moser owns 15 and pays taxes on one of the largest lots in the neighborhood. They have worked with 16 staff and changed plans a number of times in order to create a modest footprint that is 17 well within the hardcover allowances. He believes 90% of homes in the 18 neighborhood wouldn't be buildable without a variance. The house was pushed to the 19 south in order to improve drainage from Balsam on the north. The house has to be 20 raised in order to accommodate all the drainage from the neighbors. He stated that 21 the side -load garage limits the width of the house and improves the aesthetics. He 22 noted that there are five other homes in the neighborhood that utilize right-of-way for 23 driveways. He believes the use is reasonable and would be a benefit the 24 neighborhood and that it is in character with the neighborhood. 25 26 Brian McCool (lawyer representing Don and Stacy Brown 2935 Ardmore) stated that 27 he had provided a written letter to the Commission a month ago. He stated that his 28 clients are not opposed to the Mr. Moser using the property, but that this is too much. 29 The variances requested are far beyond the minimum required. The combination of 30 height and location from the street would make it the most imposing structure in the 31 neighborhood. The fill exacerbates the height issue because height is measured from 32 the grade. He noted that the property is different than others along Lake Ardmore 33 because of the wetlands. City ordinances require that, on average, houses should be 34 50 feet from the wetland. Instead, this proposal places the whole house within 35 feet 35 of the wetland. He stated that the hardcover calculations being used by staff do not 36 consider the driveway in the right-of-way He noted that staff's mention of the 37 variance at 2992 Ardmore is not relevant because there is no such thing has precedent 38 in variances. He also noted that 2992 Ardmore is much different as it sits on the dead 39 end and there is no wetland before reaching the lake. He stated that, in his opinion, 40 the City would not be open to a takings claim, because the applicant could request, 41 and the City could approve, of a much smaller house. 42 43 Nolan stated that there are 400 square feet, so some degree of variance or variances 44 almost have to be granted. He inquired that, if that were the case, what the variances 45 would McCool's clients prefer. Would they prefer pushing the house closer to the 46 lake to increase the distance from the street? 3 1 2 Stacy Brown (2935 Ardmore) stated that she believed the three car garage is 3 excessive and the height of house after the fill is excessive. Ardmore is the prettiest 4 street in the neighborhood. What is being proposed feels like Plymouth and 5 Woodbury. 6 7 Martin stated that she questioned earlier whether the City should consider the 8 minimum building size allowable, or if the City should place more consideration with 9 similar homes in the neighborhood. She asked McCool for a citation on the matter. 10 11 McCool stated that he did not have a citation but that there is substantial case law 12 which gives cities latitude in how they weigh the reasonableness of the use against 13 minimum standards and neighborhood standards. It is his and his clients' contention 14 that the extent of the variances in this case is unreasonable and he believes the City 15 would be safe to make such findings. 16 17 Jim Leviton (2945 Ardmore) presented a powerpoint presentation, which was 18 provided for the record. He stated the lot was purchased for only $40,000 and that the 19 applicant should have known it was unbuildable. The setbacks were the same in 20 2006. He stated that the things the applicant is requesting are unreasonable: the 21 applicant is requesting 4 variances; he wants to bring in 500 cubic yards of fill and cut 22 down 10 of the largest trees; he wants to use the unopened right-of-way for part of his 23 improvements. Leviton noted that water from the neighborhood runs onto this 24 property and is filtered before running into Lake Ardmore, and from there to Lake 25 Independence. He does not believe the first criteria for a variance has been met, 26 because it is contrary to the spirit and intent of the Comp Plan's goals to protect 27 natural resources and the natural environment. He stated that the requested variances 28 are not the minimum and granting them would confer special privileges. The 29 applicant has caused the need for the variances because he wants a big house with a 30 three -car garage. He believes the applicant has created the need for the variance by 31 requesting too large of a house. He believes that the house is like a billboard which 32 would negative impact the neighborhood. He stated that the proposed house would 33 negatively impact the visual characteristics, it would sits on higher ground, would 34 blocks the path down to the lake, and would sit closer to the road than any other in the 35 area. He concurred with McCool that the variance at 2992 Ardmore is not relevant 36 and noted that the League of Minnesota Cities states that previous variances should 37 not be used as precedent. He stated that it is the wrong house on the wrong lot. 38 39 Stacy Brown stated that she uses the right-of-way in order to drag a canoe down to 40 Lake Ardmore and to ice skate. There are houses next door to the north that sit lower 41 than the street, so she feels the fill is unnecessary. She noted that Lake Ardmore is 42 impaired and adding more hardcover to it is a negative. 43 44 Andy Sooney — 2942 Ardmore — stated that run-off runs from the neighborhood flows 45 down the Palm Street right-of-way. The fill is concerning because it might push 4 1 water onto his property. He also noted that the Palm Street right-of-way is the only 2 access to the stream and wondered if the City would be able to get machinery in. 3 4 Public Hearing closed at 8:45 p.m. 5 6 Martin stated that her initial thought was to not recommend approval of the variance 7 as presented. The comments from staff related to grading put her at ease that the 8 proposal is consistent with the Com Plan. She believes the size of the house leads to 9 need for some of the variances. With regards to the character of the neighborhood, 10 she believes the three car garage is out of character. 11 12 Foote stated that the Commission was coming really close to house design. He stated 13 that he agreed with Martin that a smaller house likely makes more sense. He stated 14 that he was bothered by the use of the right-of-way. Foote stated that he thinks the 15 house would fit the character of the neighborhood. 16 17 V. Reid stated that she was concerned with the setback from the street. She believes 18 the house is too large. She stated that she was not as bothered by the use of the Palm 19 Street right-of-way. She said it is important to consider the fact that the land takes 20 everyone else's water, but she is always a proponent of limiting grading and reducing 21 the amount of fill. 22 23 Anderson stated that the property does have to handle a lot of other people's water, 24 which is not the applicant's fault, so some fill it reasonable. He stated that he would 25 recommend reducing the size of proposed house in order to reduce the variances. 26 27 Nolan stated he generally concurs with his colleagues. He stated that the easiest thing 28 to reduce would be the three car garage. He stated that he has no concern with the 29 use of the right-of-way for a driveway. He tends to be an advocate of hiding garage 30 doors, but noted that the interests of the neighborhood and the City have to be 31 protected in the license. He stated that the grading is a benefit and that it is not the 32 applicant's fault that everyone else's water comes into this lot. The combination of 33 the proximity to the street, the fill, and the height of the house seems to be the major 34 issue. He suggested that perhaps alternatives would be to bring in the fill and build a 35 one-story walk -out; or to not bring in the fill and build a two-story. He stated that he 36 believed the buffer width is more important than the setback from the buffer. He 37 noted that some people seemed to be quoting the minimum house size of 550 square 38 feet with a 440 square foot garage, but he believes a very small structure such as this 39 would be much more out of the essential character of the neighborhood. 40 41 Martin stated that she had two concerns with the right-of-way use. First, she feels 42 that the applicant proposes to "hog" the right-of-way but pushing the driveway to the 43 very middle. She noted that the driveway would not even meet setbacks if the City 44 were to vacate the right-of-way. She was also concerned about the applicant having 45 no alternative if the City wished to revoke the license for use of the right-of-way. 46 5 1 Nolan stated that he believed it appeared that all five Commissioners were likely to 2 vote for a recommendation to deny the variance as it was being presented. He noted 3 that the City Council rarely goes against a unanimous Commission recommendation. 4 He inquired if the applicant was interested in taking the feedback from the 5 Commission and updating the plans and 6 7 Motion by V. Reid, seconded by Martin, to table the Variance Request. Motion 8 carried unanimously (Absent: R. Reid and Williams). 9 10 4. Adjourn 11 12 Motion by V. Reid, seconded by Anderson, to adjourn at 9:24 p.m. Motion 13 carried unanimously. (Absent: Williams) 6 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231 .2561 planners@nacplanning.corr PLANNING REPORT TO: Medina Planning Commission Scott Johnson, City Administrator FROM: Nate Sparks DATE: November 8, 2012 RE: Medina — Fields of Medina West Preliminary Plat & Rezoning CITY FILE: L-12-093 Application Date: September 21, 2012 Review Deadline: January 19, 2013 BACKGROUND / SUMMARY OF REQUEST Mattamy Homes and RPC Medina, LLC have requested a Preliminary Plat and Rezoning for a residential subdivision on 22.86 acres immediately west of the Fields of Medina on Meander Road. The site is proposed to be rezoned to R-2, Two -Family Residential. The preliminary plat is proposed to include 65 single family houses with 3.11 net acres of parkland. The proposed density of the subdivision is 3.5 units per acre. SUBJECT SITE The property is currently used for agricultural purposes. There are two wetlands located on the property and a wooded area of approximately 2 acres in the northwest corner. An aerial of the site can be found at the top of the following page. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONING The property is guided Medium Density Residential and requires a net density of 3.5-6.99 units per acre. This land use was changed from Mixed Use to Medium Density Residential at the end of 2010 at the request of the property owner. The proposed subdivision results in a density of 3.51 units per acre, which meets minimum standards of the land use designation. The site is currently zoned Rural Residential -Urban Reserve and is proposed to be rezoned to R- 2, Two Family Residential. The R-2 District allows for smaller lot single family residential and duplexes and is intended to implement the Medium Density Residential land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan. " PRELIMINARY PLAT & LOT STANDARDS The proposed preliminary plat includes 65 single family lots, three outlots, and the dedication of right-of-way. The lots range in size from 8,001 square feet to 17,223 square feet, with the majority being between 8,000 and 9,000 square feet. Two of the outlots are for storm ponds and the third is for parkland. The following dimensional standards apply to single-family residential lots within the R2 zoning district: R2 Requirement Fields of Medina West Minimum Lot Size (single-family) 8,000 square feet 8,001 to 17,223 square feet Minimum Lot Size (two-family) 5,000 square feet per unit N/A Minimum Lot Width 60 feet 65 feet Minimum Lot Depth 90 feet 115 feet Front Yard Setback 25 feet 25 feet Front Yard Setback (garage) 30 feet 30 feet Side Yard Setback (combined) 15 feet (10 & 5) 15 feet (10 & 5) Side Yard (corner) 25 feet 25 feet Rear Yard Setback 25 feet 25 feet Rear Yard Setback (to Meander) 35 feet 35 feet Upland Wetland Buffer Setback 15 feet 15 feet Max. Hardcover 50% 50% There are several proposed lots that are through lots between the proposed Cavanaugh Trail and Meander Road. These lots are required to be platted with an additional 20 feet of depth to 2 " accommodate a buffer planting strip. The applicant is depicting these lots as being between 125 feet deep. Corner lots within the development are proposed at 80 feet wide. A single parcel that has its street side yard on Meander Road is required to be 90 feet wide and the applicant has met this standard. TRANSPORTATION Streets The applicant proposes to construct Meander Road westerly from where it currently terminates on the eastern edge of the property. Meander is proposed to be extended across the entire length of the development where it connects to the cul-de-sac where Meander Road currently ends. This will make Meander connect County Road. 116 with Arrowhead Drive. Much of Meander Road is proposed to be constructed outside the bounds of the subject property. This requires an easement to be provided for the road. The applicant is proposing a single access point to the development off of Meander Road to the development in the southeast corner of the site. This entrance on Cavanaugh Drive is located within 300 feet of the conceptual location of future Tamarack Drive, as discussed with the Mixed Use Concept Plan for the property to the east. Staff is concerned that this alignment will cause interference with any potential access point to the south of Meander for the eastern 1/2 of the property. Ideally, locating the access further to the west would reduce potential interference and may improve traffic patterns. The City Engineer has stated that the proposed access point would function as long as Meander Road would not need to accommodate an access to the south across from Cavanaugh Drive. Additionally, the City Engineer is recommending left turn lanes to be constructed for the easterly 600 feet of Meander Road adjacent to this subdivision. The internal streets of this subdivision are provided in 50 foot wide right-of-ways. Roads are 28' wide, similar to Fields east and Enclave. This would require "No Parking" on one side of the street to accommodate circulation for public safety functions. This may be acceptable provided the applicant can adequately demonstrate to the City Engineer that all utilities and other such public facilities may be located within the right-of-way. The applicant is providing an extension of an internal street to serve the property to the north. The traffic study that was done for the property to the east has been updated to include assumptions for this development. It is currently being reviewed by City Staff. The applicant shall be required to construct any improvements which are determined necessary by the City following this study, including potential improvements on Meander Road, Arrowhead Drive or County Road 116. The streets within the development are proposed to be named Cavanaugh Drive, Cavanaugh Trail, and Cavanaugh Way. The Subdivision Ordinance states that individual street names should not duplicate nor resemble too closely names of other streets. Therefore, it would be recommended that each street within the division receive a relatively unique name. Trails & Sidewalks f& The applicant proposes a sidewalk on one side of the interior streets for pedestrian circulation. This sidewalk connects to the trail along Meander at the entrance driveway, and would also connect with the park at the southeast corner of the property. There is also a trail proposed to access the park on the northern edge of the development. UTILITIES Sewer & Water The applicant proposed to bring a sewer line north from Highway 55 along the western side of the property to the south up to the site. The sewer manhole in the southwest corner of the plat should be lowered in elevation in order to allow for connection by surrounding property. A water main is proposed from Arrowhead east to this property connecting to the existing water system and creating a loop. The City Engineer has reviewed the sewer and water plan and has provided comments in the letter attached. The City is strongly considering placing a water tower in the park property due to its ideal location to serve the community. Stormwater Management The applicant has provided a storm water management plan. The Engineer's review of this plan is attached. There will be some minor modifications to the plan necessary. The applicant is proposing three storm ponds. One is in the park, another is in the central portion of the site (Outlot B), and the third is in the northwest corner (Outlot C). Staff is concerned about the lack of access to the central pond for the purpose of maintenance. Staff recommends that the plat and construction plans be updated to provide circulation acceptable to the City, which may include placing additional property into outlots and adjusting retaining wall designs. Storm water calculations for the pond in the park should be submitted distinguishing the source between the park and the development for storm water. The City Engineer, Public Works Superintendent and Building Official all recommend that the applicant design a system to handle footing draintiles/sump pumps so that neighbors do not discharge water at each other or illegally dump water in the sanitary sewer system. WATER RESOURCES Wetlands & Floodplains There is a 10,000 square foot wetland area in the eastern portion of the development which is proposed to be located on the park property. The applicant has proposed an upland buffer consistent with City regulations. An upland buffer planting plan is required. There is a smaller wetland on the southern portion of the site that is proposed to be filled for this development. This proposed action needs to reviewed for consistency with the Wetland Conservation Act, including any required mitigation. 4 The northwestern corner of the site is indicated as being in a floodplain. On the FEMA flood panel this area is indicated as Zone A which has an undetermined flood elevation. This places this property in the General Floodplain District. The elevation of this area appears to be substantially higher than other areas within this flood zone area, however, the applicant should provide additional information confirming this condition. Irrigation Lawn and landscape irrigation systems are not permitted to be connected to the City water supply in any new development. The applicant will need to provide an alternative irrigation system utilizing water from the stormwater ponds and perhaps supplemented by private wells. The design of this system will need to be approved by the City Engineer, and staff recommends a condition that the development submits annual well pumping and irrigation system use records to the City. LANDSCAPING & TREE PRESERVATION Tree Preservation There is a woodland area in the northwest corner of the site. This site is identified in the City's Open Space Preservation Plan as a "Boxelder-Green Ash Disturbed Native Forest". In this area, the trees are identified for removal and replacement by a stormwater pond. In its entirety, the project proposes to remove 6117" of significant trees on the site. This equates to an 80% removal exceeding the 20% allowed and requiring 4717" of replacement trees. The applicant has not provided a tree replacement plan due to the extraordinary amount of replacement trees needed to fulfill this requirement on top of the trees required for buffer yards and other plantings. The ordinance states that the Council may grant a waiver to this requirement on a case by case basis. As part of such a waiver, the applicant has proposed to develop significant portions of the public park, including planting replacement trees within the park. The specific improvements have yet to be planned, but shall include at least the following improvement of a design and quality acceptable to the City: 1) playground equipment; 2) construction of trails; 3) paving and curbing of any parking lot; 4) grading and seeding of park; 5) planting trees. If a waiver or similar agreement is unacceptable to City Officials then the applicant will need to submit a tree preservation plan meeting all the requirements of the Ordinance. Buffer Yards The ordinance requires buffer yards as a way to ease transitions between uses in a mixed use development. In this case a buffer yard with an opacity of 0.1 is required along Meander Road. Staff also recommends that a buffer yard with a minimum opacity of 0.1 be placed at the year of the homes along the park. Landscaping The ordinance requires two trees to be planted on each single family lot, one of which is required to be located in the front yard. As proposed, the landscaping plan exceeds these minimum requirements. PARK DEDICATION The City's Park Dedication requirement is 10% of the buildable land area. The site is 22.86 in gross acres. Subtracting the two existing wetlands and the site is 21.71 net acres in size. The required dedication is approximately 2.2 acres. The applicant is proposing to dedicate 3.11 acres for parkland. The park is proposed to be located on the eastern edge of the property to be combined with the parkland acquired with the Fields of Medina subdivision to the east. This parkland includes a storm pond that will serve the park and part of this development that takes up about a half an acre. Thus, the usable portion of the park appears to slightly exceed parkland dedication requirements. APPLICATION REVIEW The subdivision regulations state that the Planning Commission and City Council shall deny approval of a plat based on one or a combination of the following findings: (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. If the City does not make these findings, and the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, City ordinances, and other City policies, the preliminary plat should be approved. RECOMMENDATIONS The application provided attempts to create a Medium Density Residential development with using only single family residential units. By doing this the applicant needs to remove a large number of existing trees that are identified in the City's Open Space Plan. However, the applicant is providing a development that meets density requirements and provides extra park land dedication. If the applicant can provide an adequate resolution to the tree replacement issue, this application may be deemed acceptable. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Rezoning and Preliminary Plat with the conditions noted below: 1) The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include the conditions described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy. 6 2) The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans received by the City on September 21, 2012. The design of all improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing construction. 3) The Applicant shall provide a letter of credit prior to any site construction in an amount recommended by the City Engineer to ensure completion of the improvements identified in the approved plans. 4) Prior to final plat approval, the Applicant shall provide detailed construction plans for review by the City Engineer. 5) The Applicant shall dedicate land to the City for park purposes in an amount determined by the City Council following recommendation by the Park Commission. 6) The Applicant shall provide an easement for the Meander Road right-of-way prior to approval of the Final Plat. 7) No lawn or landscape irrigation systems shall be permitted to be connect to the City water system. The Applicant shall provide details of alternative measures prior to final plat approval. If the Applicant proposes to drill a well in order to provide water for lawn irrigation, annual pumping records shall be provided to the City. 8) The Applicant shall provide a design for the discharge of water from footing draintiles/sump pumps which prevents water from impacting neighboring properties and which is acceptable to the Public Works Superintendent. 9) Meander Road shall be designed to accommodate left turn lane(s) as recommended by the City Engineer. 10) The pond in Outlot B shall be redesigned to provide for better access as recommended by the City Engineer. 11) Pond calculations for Pond A shall be submitted distinguishing the source between the park and the development for storm water. 12) The sewer manhole in the southwest corner of the plat should be lowered as much as feasible as recommended by the City Engineer. 13) All the streets within the plat are named Cavanaugh. Each street should have a unique street name not used elsewhere within the City. 14) A buffer yard with a 0.1 opacity should be placed on the rear of the properties adjacent to the park. Additionally, wetland buffer plantings will be required on the parcels adjacent to the wetland. 15) An upland buffer planting plan is required. 7 16) A tree replacement plan is required. 17) All comments of the City Engineer shall be addressed. 18) All comments of the City Attorney shall be addressed, and the Applicant shall abide by the City Attorney's recommendations related to title issues and recording procedures. 19) The Applicant shall obtain wetland and floodplain permitting approval prior to final plat approval. 20) The Applicant shall provide Homeowner's Association documents for City review. This document shall describe responsibilities for maintenance of stormwater improvements, buffer yards, and lawn irrigation systems. 21) The Applicant shall obtain necessary approvals and permits from the Elm Creek Watershed, Hennepin County, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Metropolitan Council, and other relevant agencies. 22) The application for final plat shall be submitted to the City within 180 days of preliminary approval or the preliminary plat shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council. 23) The application for final plat shall be submitted to the City within 180 days of preliminary approval or the preliminary plat shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council. 24) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, construction plans, and other relevant documents. If the Planning Commission finds that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision Ordinance, and Zoning Ordinance it would be appropriate to recommend denial of the application to the City Council. If more information is needed in order to make this determination, it may be appropriate to table with a specific request for more information. POSSIBLE ACTIONS A. Motion to recommend approval of the requested Preliminary Plat & Rezoning with the list of conditions. B. Motion to recommend denial of the requested Preliminary Plat & Rezoning. 8 C. Motion to table. If made, this motion should be supported with direction to the applicant on specific identified issues, so the applicant can revise their plans for submission to the City prior to the next Planning Commission meeting. Exhibits: 1. City Engineer's Report(s) 2. Applicant's Narrative 3. Applicant's Plan Set c. Dusty Finke Debra Peterson -Dufresne Tom Kellogg Ron Batty 9 ENGINEERING I SURVEYING 1 ENVIRONMENTAL I PLANNING Rezoning and Preliminary Plat - Fields of Medina West (Cavanaugh Property) On behalf of The Mattamy Homes, we are pleased to present to the City of Medina our preliminary plat and development plans for Fields of Medina West— a 65 lot residential subdivision. The City of Medina reviewed alternative concept plans for the Cavanaugh property earlier this year. Based on the comments received by City Council, Planning Commission, Park Commission and staff, the preliminary plat and plans were prepared for City approval. In conjunction with the preliminary plat approval, Mattamy Homes is also requested the proposed land be rezoned from rural residential/urban reserve to R-2 — consistent with City's future land use plan. The preliminary plat plan meets the required minimum density for the property, 3.5 — 6.99 units per acre. To achieve this density, the wooded area in the northwest corner of the property had to be utilized for building sites. During the concept review process — the park board and council stated that preserving the trees in lieu of density was not desired by the City -- and receiving park dedication over the tree area was not an option. The site contains 65 residential lots providing a net density of 3.51 units per acre. As requested by the park board — the park land dedication area (3.11 acres) has been created on the east side of the property and size maximized beyond the dedication requirements per City code (2.17 acres). As such, the required tree replacement for the site is too large to accommodate on this site alone. Mattamy Homes is hopeful the City will reconsider the full replacement requirements, or be open to alternative solutions for this issue. This development will complete the connection of Meander Road from County Road 116 to Arrowhead Road, providing the City with an important collector road connection. The traffic issues at the intersection of County Road 116 and STH 55 are poor and require necessary improvements by Hennepin County. The connection of Meander Road will immediately help the traffic flow in this area. Also included in our project is the extension of 12" watermain to Arrowhead Road. This watermain connection provides a critical looped system for the City of Medina along the north side of STH 55. We look forward to creating this new neighborhood for the City of Medina to compliment the many fine neighborhoods in the City. The Developer and Builder, Mattamy Homes and the Consultant Engineer, EVS have worked complementary with your professional staff and will strive to bring to your community a long lasting asset to the community. We stand available to answer any questions or issues you may have now and in the future. Please contact Dave Nash at EVS if you have any questions regarding the submitted preliminary plans and plat for Fields of Medina West. Thank you. Dave Nash, PE EVS, Inc. 1 Director of Residential Development Direct: (952) 646-0253 1 Cell: (612) 242-0530 dnash@evs-eng.com EVS 110250 Valley View Rd., Suite 1231 Eden Prairie, MN 55344.35341 Phone: 952.646.02361 Fax: 952.646.02901 www.evs-eng.com WSB AllaillIMM & dssocimes. Inc. Engineering • Planning • Environmental • Construction October 3, 2012 Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: City Project: The Fields of Medina West, L-12-093 WSB Project No. 2065-270 Dear Dusty: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the preliminary plan submittal dated September 21, 2012, for The Fields of Medina West subdivision. The plans include street and utility improvements to serve 65 proposed single family homes. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters. 1. The proposed Meander Road along the south side of the plat is mostly on the parcel to the south. The plat states the road right-of-way is being conveyed by easement and not fee title. The City should review if a roadway easement is acceptable and evidence should be provided to the City that the applicant has control over this area. 2. The plans should include details as to how the proposed Meander Road will connect to the existing Meander Road. The details should include cul-de-sac removal and establishing the existing driveway connections. 3. The plans show the sanitary sewer connecting to the existing trunk sanitary sewer along the south side of the C.P. Rail line south of T.H. 55. The plans show casing the pipe under the railroad but not under T.H. 55. We recommend the pipe be cased under T.H. 55 to ease repair issues in the future. 4. Sheet C502 shows a rim elevation of 965.69 and invert elevations of 964.38 and 964.50 for Sanitary MH 121. It appears the rim elevation is mislabeled and should be corrected. 5. The plans should include more detail for the proposed water main connection at Arrowhead Drive. Details should include existing and proposed street sections and areas to be disturbed. 6. Some of the proposed lots shown along the east side of Cavanaugh Drive will for all practical purposes have no back yard due to the wetland and required wetland buffer setbacks. The applicant should consider revising the site layout to provide a useable backyard space for these lots. Minneapolis • St. Cloud Equal Opportunity Employer CAUserslsbucklcyAppDala Local \ Microsoft \ Windows \Temporary Internet Files \Content. OutlookW XAWS1i3A\The Fields of Medina West Plan Rev 10031: The Fields of Medina West October 3, 2012 Page 2 7. The City does not allow municipal water to be used for irrigation. Final plans should include an irrigation plan and details that demonstrates how the system will work. 8. All water main stubs should end with a hydrant. 9. The sanitary sewer stub at the north end of Cavanaugh Drive should end with a manhole. 10. The City should review the proposed street stub to the north to verify it is located in the appropriate location. 11. Truck turning movements should be provided for the southerly intersection of Cavanaugh Trail and Cavanaugh Drive. 12. The City should consider completing the necessary soil borings in the park dedication area to determine if the existing soils will support a water tower. 13. We recommend moving STMH 155 into the boulevard to minimize conflicts with the side yard D & U easement on Lot 8, Block 4. 14. Final plans should include plan and profile views of all water main, storm sewer and sanitary sewer. Stormwater review comments are attached. Please have the applicant revise the plans accordingly and resubmit for further review. Please contact me at 763-231-4865 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Tom Kellogg CAUsers\sbuckloy\AppData\Local Microsoft \ Windows \Temporary Internet Files \ContentO tlookVIXAWSE3A\The Fields of Medina West Plan Review -10031: WSB Infrastructure • Engineering • Planning • Construction & Associates. Inc. Memorandum To: Tom Kellogg, P.E., City Engineer City of Medina From: Earth Evans, P.E. Water Resources Project Manager WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: October 1, 2012 Re: Fields of Medina West Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan Review WSB Project No. 2065-270 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541-4800 Fax: 763 541-1700 We have completed a preliminary review of the stormwater management plan for Fields of Medina West development in Medina, MN. The site is located north of Meander Road, west of Pinto Drive/County Road 116. Documents provided for review include the following: • Stormwater Management Plan prepared by EVS, Inc, including HydroCAD and PondNET calculations, dated September 21, 2012 • Existing and Proposed Drainage Maps These plans were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina's Stormwater Design Manual and general engineering practices for stormwater management. Based on this review, we offer the following comments: 1. Proposed contours should be labeled and storm sewer routing, rim and inverts included in future submittals. 2. The overflow elevation for the wetland in the NE corner should be surveyed and the modeling revised to reflect this elevation. Based on review of the one foot contours on the Existing Conditions Drainage Map, it appears that this wetland overflows north and south at approximately 1007.5. The overflow elevation for this wetland impacts the rate control, freeboard and pond A (southeast corner) design. 3. Similarly, the small existing wetland in subwatershed 8S overland overflow should also be provided. It appears that this wetland discharges to the northwest versus the southeast. 4. The City utilizes the 1 -year (2.4 inch) and 10 -year (4.1 inch) events for design. 5. All EOF locations and elevations must be clearly labeled on the plans and building elevations should be adjusted as needed to meet freeboard requirements. All ponds Fields of Medina West Stormwater Management Review City of Medina Page 2 of 2 should have a protected EOF. Specifically, Lot 6, Block 4 appears to not meet the City's freeboard requirement. 6. Based on the Soil Survey, the site is characterized by hydrologic soil group C soils. Infiltration is not recommended due to the slow infiltration rates, therefore filtration has been provided. The filtration volume required is 1.08 ac -ft and is calculated as the volume between the bottom of the filtration shelf and outlet elevation. It appears as though the calculations in Appendix D also account for the wet volume in the pond. A key factor in the viability of filtration areas is allowing for the surface to dry out. Therefore the wet volume portion of the pond should be excluded from the calculation. Draintile is also recommended with filtration to facilitate drawdown. The calculations should be revised (or clarified) and resubmitted. 7. The City's Stormwater Design Manual requires that the developer provide a 20% reduction in phosphorus from existing conditions, when infiltration isn't feasible. Based on the developer's engineers PondNET calculations the development has met the phosphorus removal requirement through wet volume in the three proposed ponds. 8. The top of berm elevation of all ponds shall be a minimum of one foot above the 100 - year pond HWL. Pond C, in the northwest corner, appears to overflow the EOF for the 10 -year event. Additional pipe or storage capacity is required. 9. The City does not include infiltration/filtration in determining rate control and freeboard. Therefore the infiltration calculation in the submitted HydroCAD model should be removed. Also, the pond NWL should reflect the outlet elevation, not the bottom of the filtration shelf. 10. Pond aquatic benches should be provided one foot below the pond outlet elevation. 11. All constructed ponds require maintenance access from an adjacent road. Future submittals should clearly define the maintenance access. 12. The primary outlet for all the proposed ponds is a 3 -inch orifice. A 6 -inch orifice is the minimum allowed by the City due to maintenance issues and potential for plugging. It does not appear that a 3 -inch orifice is needed to meet the City's rate control requirement. 13. The proposed conditions model should be revised to reflect the routing of the northeast wetland to proposed pond A in the southeast corner. 14. The applicant should submit a revised stormwater management plan based on the above comments and remaining requirements outlined in the City's Stormwater Design Manual. PRELIMINARY PLAT PLANS FOR FIELDS OF MEDINA WEST Medina, MN Presented By: MATTAMY HOMES ARE A MAP SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION C100 TITLE SHEET C101 BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY C102 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN C201 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN C301 PRELIMINARY PLAT C401 PRELIM INARY GRADING PLAN C402 PRELIMINARY GRADING DETAILS C501 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN C502 PRELIMINARY OFFSITE UTILITY PLAN EXTENSIONS C503 PRELIMINARY STORM PLAN L101 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN L102 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE DETAILS PROJECT CONT ACT LIST DEVELOPER MATTAMY HOMES - MINNEAPOLIS DIVISION 2100 WEST COUNTY ROAD 42 BURNSVILLE, MN 55337 TEL: (952)898-2100 CONTACT: STE VE L OGAN EM AIL: Stev e.L ogan@mattamyhom es .c om CIVIL ENGINEER E VS, INC . 10250 VALLEY VIEW ROAD SUITE 123 E DEN PRAI RIE , MN 55344 TEL: (952) 646-0236 F AX: (952) 646-0290 CONTACT: DAVE NASH EMAIL: d na sh@ evs- eng.c om LA ND S URVEYOR EVS, INC . 10250 V ALLEY VIEW ROAD SUITE 123 E DEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 TEL: (952)646-0236 FAX: (952)646-0290 CONTACT: WAYNE LUKACHECK EMAIL: wlukeeh eck @evs-eng.com LANDSCAPING EVS, INC. 10250 VALLEY VIEW ROAD SUITE 123 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 TEL: (952) 646-0236 FAX: (952) 646-0290 CONTACT: KATHY O'CONNELL E MAIL: k oc onnel@evs-eng.com ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRON MENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC. 10250 Valley Vi ew R oad, Suite 123 Ed en Prairi e, Minn es ota 55344 Ph one: 952 .646-0236 Fax: 952.646-0290 www.e vs-eng.c om `1T Y OA (7, MEDINA City of Medin a, MN 2052 C ounty R oad 24 M edina, Minn esota 55340 Phone: 763-473-4643 Fax: 763-473-9359 www.ci.m edi na.m n.us Prelim . Plat Plans Sept . 21, 2012 PR OJEC T Fields of Medina West LOC ATION Medina, MN SH EET TITLE SHEET # D ATE RE VISION A 9/21/12 Pr eliminary Plal Plans 1 HEREB Y CER TIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SP ECIFICA TION, OR REPORT WAS PR EP ARED BY ME OR UN DER MY DI RECT S UPE RVISI ON AND THAT 1 AM A D UL Y LICENSED PROFESSION AL EN GIN EER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE S TA TE OF MINNESO TA. David Nash DAT E 9/ 21/ 2012 RE GISTRATI ON N UMB ER 21636 DR AW N BY BJ - DS DA TE 9.21.2012 CHE CKE D BY DN PROJ EC T # 2012-039 .1 SHEET NUMB ER C100 983 FOUND IP MARKED-, 984 RLS8053 %'• 99J k' 1 . EDGE OF FLOOD PLANE PER FEM A FLOOD L-' INSURANCE MAP 27053C0165E DATED SEPT., 2, 2004 cy e \ 1 1 1 1/'//J/////'//l ///// /- 1 1\ �` -' m $ mv'�m^Qem°'�o^n ..r�rnmmg, po ti M \ • 1 - .. /- •r /,, -r a - fir. /., �'f: lx r :''i.tf N89° 25' 35" E_1345. 47 NORTH U NE OF SEC. 2, TWP. 118 N. , RGE. 23 W. -` P FOUND CAST IRON MONUMEN T \ Description of Property Surve yed (Per Exhibit A of Stewart Title Guaranty Company Title Commitment No. 1010016, dated July 24, 2012) Thal part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarte r of Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies Northerly of the Southerly 582.40 feet thereof. General Notes 1) Area of subject property: 995,907.73 Sq.FI. or 22.86 Acres 2) Subject Property Address is unassigned. \ X00 3i, ° p l TM # „ ;!t; / 3) Initial field work was completed on 09/12/2012. 1 / e, \ \ _ / / \.."- �' -. - 4) Subject to easements and restrictions of record, if any. \ I ��\ \ \ \ \ \ o // / \ ♦i_K. o - - - 5) There are no BENCH MARK e lev atio ns set for this site. /�, 6) Datums: \ 1\ \\ \\\ \J / //-'' �I \LLOOs 'i9 6)1) Horizo ntal:Hennepin County Coordinate System, NAD83 (1996 Adj), Lambert Conic Conformal, 30 y Minnesota 8 i� 6)2) Vertical: NAV088 / \ \ \1 \\ / • ¥ \ 7) All distances shown hereon are in feet and tenths or hundredths of a fool. ( / 1 / 1 1 8) Contour interval =1 foot. // \ \ /�j / \ _ 9) Jurisdictional Wetlands were delineated by McCombs Frank Roos Associates (M FRA) da te d O ctober 20, \ ( I e= 2010. \ \ N. I \ \ / // T ) / ,' 10) We searched for buried structures and utilities on and/or serving the site to the best of our ability, subject to \ 0 1 I (\ J I1 too { 1 x 1 1 L j\ the follo wing restric tio ns: \\ \ 1 1\ \\ f 1 .J / \ 1 �> \\ cam n i ti, •.,:.. -. ..-:.� -1 \ \ \ 1\. WETLAND /' \ / 3/ fir , \T \ 0 \\ 103NSO. FT.# 0 / CM j/ / q9 / // ' / / 1 \ I S 1 I #I / r1" C� Y/ , / . \.• / :j: \ \ $ \ // �/ // / / '/ ▪ . 1002 —' 1 ( r.;.. / g 1\ / \*/.. // \\ ,/ rl- / / / I., \ \• 1 I. _ /' T / / /' - MINNESO TA ENERGY RESOURCES (800) 889-9508 ' o° ///' / .:\ \\ • • , rOos - - "\ \.. .... / / / / / CENTER POINT ENERGY (800) 722-9326 /' �~ /'/ ' •• ?• "/oo \\'0 \$ n \\\ \`\ 0- __ \ // /'/ /'/ / OW ESTMINNESOTA PO WER (800)283-4237 / ///' ,pO, S. / (218) 568-4754 / --- \---PoJ 1 \ \ �'� \ \- loos /'� �/ / /' /' ,h\ / /' / / /' i — `1 / \°e I L,—.��� / ,/ / / — / #N. / / ... �S / -- �. .• � \'1006' i / /� .,1006 / ro — i / �\ ..r r''' rood, I 1343.02 ' 999_7 3' 37" w q • ` vs •r e, !1,4/0L .. / `FOUNDIP M ARKED RLS 12755 II//� � \�--/ � \�- - N. N. \ \ \\ Fq "10 40 / / 7 - ,NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY ; I / \ I , / / 1 582.40 FEET OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW ` l \ \ / / ,/ I 1/4 OF SEC. 2, TWP. 118 N., RGE. 23 W. I \ 1 \ / \ / b'� f:/??Ici ', // i :IT - 9989,1 ./1 f' 9 9 96 992 \ \ \ (\ \ 9911\ \ FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT -SOU TH LINE OF SEC. 2, TWP. 118 N., RGE. 23 W. FOUND CAST IRO N MONUMENT ' V I�� J / FOUND CAST IRON MONU MENT A.Utility operations do not consistently respond 10 locale requests through the Gopher Stale One Call service for boundary purposes such as this. B. Those utility operators that do respond, often will not locate services from their main line to the customer's structure or facility - they consider those segments private installations that are outside their jurisdiction. If a private service to an adjoiners side crosses this site or a service to this site crosses an adjoiner, it may not be located since most operators will not mark such privat e services. C.Snow and ice conditions during winter months may obscure otherwise visible evidence of a buried structure or utility. D. Maps provided by o perato rs, either a long with a field lo cation or in lieu of such a location, are very often inaccurate or inconclusive. E. EXTREM E CAUTIO N MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT (651) 454-0002. F. Per Gopher Slate One -Call Ticket No. 121842362, the followi ng utilities and municipalities were notified: LEGEND o FOUND CIM • FOUND IP O SET IP DECIDUOUS TREE TREE LINE — - MAJOR CONTOUR INTERVAL MINOR CONTOUR INTERVAL BITU MINOUS SURFACE GRAVEL SURFACE -Ml- -81— EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND — —FP — EDGE OF FLOOD PLANE PER FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAP 27053C0165E D ATED SEPT., 2, 2004 ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRON MENTAL PL ANNING EVS, INC. 10250 Valley View Ro ad, Suit e 123 Eden Prairie, Minn esot a 55344 Phone, 952-646-0236 Fax: 952-646-0290 www .evs-eng.com GRAPHIC SCALE so o a w 100 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch =10051 VICINITY MAP (N ot To S cole) 1 I ti II I I 1= —H I' I Sit e PROJ ECT Fields of Medina West LOCATION Medina, MN SHEE T Boundary and Topographic Survey # DAT E RE VISION 1 09.18.12 Initial Drawing Subtl . 2 09.21.12 Upd ated Drawing I HEREB Y C ERTIF Y THAT THIS PL AN G OR REPO RT WAS P REP ARED BY ME OR 5 UN DER MY DI REC T SUPER VISION AN D TH AT I AM A D UL Y LICENSED PROF ESSION AL S URV EYOR UND ER THE LAWS OF TH E S TATE OF MINN ESOT A. MICHAEL R. WILLIA MS in DA TE 09.14.2012 R EGISTR ATION NUMBER 44076 DRAWN BY C HECKED BY MRW MRW D AT E PROJECT # , 09 .18 .2012 2012-039 .1 it SHEET NUMBER 0 L C101 0 84,04., 7'm Diameter Aal on Pni .- 1587 Della ous • 29 Ox It 7569 D eciduous 10 Ox Is e 1591 . 12 Olfsit e 3 D eciduous 1593 D eciduous 41 ''I Oihlte 7S% Deciduous 21 , ONarc 7 e 1597 D eciduous 36 Oxsil e 1599 D eciduous 34 Oxshe 1601 D eciduous 8 Save 1603 D eciduous 13 Save 1605 Deciduous 11 ONsit e 1607 Deciduous 11 OMsit e fat e20- 1609 Decidu ous 30 ONsit c __2020 20202020 20 1 2020- _ Write 163 Deciduous 12 ; Offsile 1613 De ciduous 14 _Def oe _-_ 1sss De ciduous 46 '. oxtlrc 2020- 2020 o �2020e 1617 Deciduous 36 0lfsite 1639 Deciduous 15 Offslrc Dec . 2020 - - 1511 Decidu ous 11 Oasd e 1623 _.. . .__ De Id 14 Oxsii e 1625 De ciduo us 25 Offsite 2020_ _. .. _. - 20.20 Number 7m :game.,[i nj Actium Numb er Tr ee Di 003., MI A rden Nu mber Tree i ganrhrlin].. .., Action Numb er Tree ' Diameter DM Action N umber Tree 10230 De ad Ioz31 Decid uous Diameterjln] Actio n I ]2 Ol hke 10 Save Number1 Tr ee Diameter Ani on 10]38 Decidu ous 10 Remo ve 1®B O edesnus 10 Remov e 21183 2084 Deciduous 10 Remove Deciduous 10 R em ov e 2191 D etlduo z ~ 10 Remo ve __-__2020. d _-_ 2192 Decid uous 12 Remove 10122 LIITi - Decidu ous 20 DAN. __ . Deciduo us 10 Sav e .2020 1803 Dedduo 15 � OHtirc .._ 1815 Deciduous D ORsite 103/01 10341 10342 10333 10344 180.5 10346 103/7 10348 _ Deciduo us 12 R ve : Deciduous 12 Remov e Deciduo us ID R move_ Dedduas 10 R em ove d D eddlaus 10 Remov e Deciduo us 10 Rem ove --- Decidu ous 24 Remov e j Decidu ous 32 P e Decidu ous 41 Remove -_ 2020_ . 10232 Deciduous 10233 Deciduo us 10234 De ciduous ec 10235 Deciduous _. 10236 Oa oduous 10237 De cduous 10238 Deciduous 10239 Deciduous 10240 Deciduous 10247 Deoduous 10242 Decidu ous 10243 De ad us 10244 De Da _I 2020-- 45 De 10245 Deciduous ,4 10246 Decid uous 10247 De ciduous 2020 10248 Deciduou s Deod uo 10250 Deciduous j 12 Save 18 5m � 12 S ave 6, • 1H Olhke 15 am ! ]5 Save 18 5m '. 12 l2ha e 12 Oflsne 8 Offske 10 Ofhlte 8 S av e a sm 2020 Remove % Remove 10 O/fsRe 12 Oflsh e - 10 Ofhke ]0 S ave 1 12 Save 2020 10124 Decidu ous 15 Save 2261 Decid uous ? 14 •OH9te 2263 Deddous 16 Save 2265 D ecid uous : 13 Save 40 2267 Deciduo us '. 10 Save 2268 Deciduo us : 111 Sav e 1270 Deciduous � 12 Sav e 2271 Decid uous • 28 Save 2273 D ecidu ous ]D Save -__ _ .. -_ . . ._ .. __ 2274 Decid uous 12 Save ...00 2276 Decidu ous 8 Save - 2278 Ded daus 10 Save 7280 Decid uous - 10 Save .._.04 5 .0 , 10 S av e 7162 Deade1 1181 Deciduous � 12 Sav e __ . . 2189 Decid uous 1 ]6 • Save 2286 Moduoes 1 13 Save - _ 2287 Deciduous 12 Sav e 2289 D etld uo 9 I Sav e 2211 Decidu ous r Oflate 24 - 1243 Ded da 11 f1Nsf@ 1801. De ciduo us . __ 11?Offslte 1809 Decidu ous _ _ . 12 Sav e 1813 Deciduo us 15 • Save 18ll Decidu ous 12 Sav e 1815 Decidu ous 10 • O%Rte 1817 Decid uous 16 Save 1819 De cid uous : 15 Save Save 1821 Deciduous 9 - Save 1823 D ecid uous 40 Sav e 04 1ffi5 D ecdu ous 36 Sa ve 1ffi] De cid uous 24 R em ove 1995 D ecid uo us 10 -, R em ov e 2020- R---.._ 1986 Decidu ous 10 Remove 1987 Deciduous 10 Remove 1%7 De 1988 Deciduous 15 Remove 193 Deciduo us 30 I Remove -_ 1990 o¢adv us • 47 Remove 1991 D edd uo. , 12 1 R emo ve 1992 Dedd uo 8 + Rem ove .2020 2065 2086 D eciduoust 10 Remove D eciduo us 10 Remove 10325 10126 10127 10128 10129 2020 - 10130 1200 10131 10132 10133 10134 10135 0120_,20 1olz 30137 10138 10139 10140 10111 10142 _- 10143 10144 Deciduo us_ 38 Save Deciduous 15 ONske Deciduous 12 Orate . o,. , D ecid uous Is Oflsite De duous 15 Offale ms Decidu ous 8 Dn. De du ous _ 12 Or ate Decidu ous li DRsrte De 'du ous 24 R emove Decidu ous • 10 Rem ove Decidu ous 8 ON to ._ .-. .__ Dedeewt • 10 orate d--- to Decid uous 12 Orate 1te Deciduous 15 ONate Decid uous 36 Orate d Re Decidu ous 15 Oeod 35 Remov e10249 De D ecidu ous 18 Re Dodd 35 - Pe Decid uous ]5 Rem ote 2081 2088 1%9 2090 2020 2091 2020202m 71191 2093 2 034 2095 'Dead 7(36. 2037 _; D eciduous ! 12 Remove D eciduous 36 R emove De ciduous 15 Remove D ecidu ous 15 Rem ove Decidu ous :. 15 Rem058 Decide.. ; 117 Remove De duous '. 10 Remo ve Deciduous : 15 Remove .-- - ous : 15 Remo ve •__ De d_� 12 Remove _.. D ecidu ous '. 12 Remove 7098 2099 2100 2101 2102 Deciduous '. 12 Remove Remove Deciduous ' 10 Remove D eciduo us 1 15 Remove Oe d . ]8 Rem Dead ]H R em ove 288 2100 D ecidu ous 15 em I .R .._._20 .20 D ead sus � 12 Remove 1627 De ciduo us 14 Mite 10251 Deciduous 10252 Deciduous '. 10 Saw I 12 llf hke 1993 Decid uo24 1 - 1991 Detld uous_j 12 1 19% Deciduou s : 15 Remo ve Remo ve Remove 1629 Deciduous 24 � (2fsirc 2105 Decidu ous 12 Remove 2295 D eciduo us 1 12 ', Remot e 1631 Deciduous 9 I Orate 1633 Deciduous 36 ! O&M 2106 Decidu ous I 12 Remove ._ _ 2297__ ._ -Deciduous 1 24 ON95 e 2299 D eciduous i 32 I Remove 10145 Decduous 10 Rem ove 10253 Deddaouz 1 10 ONske 20.20-- _--.- ..__ 10146 _ __20__20 Decidu ous 8 Rem ove - 10251 Deciduous 10 ONske 2107 a__.____._ D ecidu ous I 10 R emove 1635 Oeciduom : 9 % Orate 20__20 ___1_ MOW _-_ De 1637 ciduous 3 _ 7 Oxsite 20__20 2020 1639 Deciduous 8 On. 1641 Deciduous 28 � Orsirc __- 1643 De ciduous 11 ,Drove 20_20 1%6 Deciduous 12 .2020- 1edduo 10 997 D 1%8 Dedduo 12 1999 � De ciduous �. 12 Remov e Remo ve Remove Remove 10147 Decidu ous 10 _ ._ R em ove 10255 D¢dduo. I 32 : Ofhke 1 _ 2108 213 2110 11_20__ 2111.__ 2112 D eciduous i ._. 15- .. Remove D eciduous ' 10 Remove O ecid,aus j- ]0 Remove De cidu ous _1 10 Rem ove Deciduo us 10 Remove 233] Deciduous r ]0 Remove 2302 Ded da I 15 ONYte 2301 Deciduous 30 I Oflate cid e 7306 Decid uous 13 I Save , 2307 Decid uous 11 1 Remove 10256 Dedtluo. 10257 Deciduous � I 32 %bite 12 t7liske 10149 13119 Dedduas 10 R emove Deciduous • 26 � Banque 150 ]0150 Deciduo us 12 : Rem ove 10258 D eciduo us 1 10 ' Olfsk e ]000 Dedd uo._. _. _leRemove 281 Deciduous u R emove 73751 De cidu ous 12 Rem ove 1059 Deciduou s 10760 Deua uou s ' 10 ]2 Save Remove ... 1645 De ciduous 11 i Sav e 1647 De ciduous 19 L Orate 1649 2020_ -Decidu ous 17 Oasite 2032 _Decided. 1 12 2003 Deciduous I 8 1Remore Remove 2113 -r D eciduo us 8 Remove 1308 Deddqus 11 Remove 10152 Deciduous 12 Re move 2114 D eciduo us 1 8 Remov e 2310 D eciduous 18 % 0139468 10153 :. 0 244 00us 8 Remove 10261 Deddsaus 18 Rem ov e 1651 Deciduou s 13 Oxsite 2004 ' Deciduous % 10 -"1 Rem ove 2115 O eddua39j 10 Rem ove 2312 Decidu ous I 10 WM. 10154 Dedd,. : 10 R emove ua 1@Q Deddaus 36 Rem ov e 1653 Deciduous ' 11 i save 2006 % De cidu ou s 18 1 Remove 2116 D eciduo us I 12 Remove 2314 Deciduous l- 12 1 Orate 10155 Deciduo us 18 Rem ove 10263 Deddueu 3 8 Remo ve 10156 Deddu a,, 15 Offatt 10264 Decduous I 10 Rem ove 2117 D eciduo us I 12 Remove 2316 Deciduous 12 i Save 2106 ' Decidu ou s : 24 Remove Deciduou s 19 i Save 2110 D ecidu ous6 Remove 2317 Dead 4as 22 Remove 2319 Decidu ous I 10 Remove 2321 Deciduousf lI 18 ONste 2323 Deciduous >3 % Remove ]0157 Deciduous 15R e 1o766 Dtadao u Remov -- -I ._ _1655 wet De dth eous 8 oxd e 1659 Decide s : 9 i- Save 1661 Deciduou s _ 15 Save 1663 De ciduous 8 I save 1665 - 2020 De Ids 14 Save uw ._. 207 Deciduou s 20_20 8 1006 oeddu0 . 8 203 - Deddou1?i 3m(_ Deaaw _ 15 2011 Dedduoo s Iov 8 Rem ove Rem ove R emdn Reme Remove _2020 10266 Deoda _ 10267 _ Deoda IOibs Decid uous 10269 Deciduous 12 Remo ve• - .15 Rem ove � 12 _Remove 8 Remo ve 10158 10159- 10160 Decidu ous I5 R emove D eddua os : IS Remove 1leddmarm 15 R em ove 2119 2120, z2121 2322 Deddu ous ' 15 Rem ove_ D eciduo us 12 Remov e Dedae ems _1_a Remov e Deciduous 8 Rem ove _._. .. - _- 2325 Decduous I 12 1 Off ate 10161 Decidu ous 15 R em ove 1667 D eciduous 42 I _ Mite 1669 Deciduo us 9 rt %bite 2012 ooddu ous : 12 _. _Remove 2123 2124 De cidu ous 1 I0 - .. Remove Decidu ous 1 12 Remove _. 2327 Dedduws 15 Save 10162 Dedd eo3.5 -- 12 Remove 10270 Dedduoos s 8 Rem ove 1___ .______- .___ 101E3 Deciduo us 12 ' Re move __. 10271 D eciduous 10 Remov e ._ ._ 2329 C onifer ous i 12 ONsit e -. _ 2014 - Deciduou s 12 Remove - 1 10164 Deciduo us , 15 Remove 10272 Oedduous 10 Remo ve 2331 Coniferous I- 12 I Off ate 2015 De cidu ou s 30 I Remo ve .. ._._ 2325 2126 D eciduo us I 15 Remove Deciduous 1 12 Remove _ 1571 Deciduous : II ONslrc _•_ 1673 De ciduo us 48 White -_ _ T 10273 Decidu ous _ 12 R emo ve 30165 Decidu ous ; 42 Re move 1-, use 2017 Deciduous[ 10 �kmove 2333 C oniferous 7 r %Nate 10274 Deciduous 1 12 Remove _ 2020- I_- 10166 Deciduo us : 18 Re move rI 2335 Decduous I- M I Off she 2127 Decidu ous 1 24 Remove _2020- ...- 2018 O eddumus I 12 1 Re move 1675 De ciduo us 48 Off., ___ - _-__- _.-._ (_ . ---_- , 2128 2129 2130 1]31 1131 Decidu ous 8 Remo ve Dedduan I 8 Remove Remo ve Deciduo us . 18 Rem Deciduous 10 R<m ` e Dead s 18 Rem ove 2337 Decid ous L 12 1 Save 10167 Deaa uas�', 12 Re move 10275 D eciduo s 20019 D ecidu ou s - 12 I Remo ve 1679 De (duous 10 1 ON he 1679 Deciduou s;. 13 �_ Sav e 1681 De ciduous 24 WNW 1693 Deciduo us 9 White -- ---- ,- L._.. 16ss De ciduous to .; sa ve 137 De ciduou s ' 28 I Sav e _ _ 10276 D eddios 10277 ....Dead. _ _32 _Remove 10 Rem ove 18 %mo ve _.. 2339 Deciduous t 9 j Orate _ 2341 Decid uous I 10 Remove 2020 __. 2020 2343 Conif rws 12 J Of/ate 2020 2020- 2020-- 2345 Deci duo us 10 OHale 10]68 1013 Decidu ous 12 : Remote Deciduo us 12 R emove 2020 Deciduo us I., 12 Remo ve 2020, 3021 De ciduous 12 2022 Decidu ous 9_-.T 3023 Decidu ous ss i _ Remo ve Remo ve Remo ve ]Ol7o Decidu ous i 18 ' Re naud 10278 Deciduous 10219 Deciduous 8 Remo ve - 8 Rem ove ]Din Decid uous 15 %mso re 10280 Deciduous , 8 Rem ov e 10172 Deciduous17 R emo. 2133 Deciduous I 10 R emove 234 Deu do us I_. -.111 1 Orat e - 2348 Decidu ous i 10 , - Offarc 1024 ' 15 1 Re move 10263 Decid uous M Rem ove- 20_20 _2020 _ 1%73 Decid uous ' 12 Remove _2020Decidu ous 2025 Dedduo : 8 [ Remove 2134 - Rem o. De ciduo us 1 8 Remo 16% Deciduou s 8 I Oas]te 10174 Deddn ous 24 Rem ove 10282 Deciduous IOA3 Deciduous 4 1 1_ 15 Remove ]0 Remo ve 2135 De ciduous 1 12 Remove 2319 Deciduous 1 10 01680 2026 Dec idu ou s T_ 10 I_ Remove -._ 1691 Deciduous 8 ',. 06tune 2351 Detlduous� 10 CNN. 10175 D ecidu ous : 8 Re new 2027 Decidu ous 18 I Remove 2136 Deciduous h 12 Rem ove 1693 Deciduous 9 ORslte 10284 Deadans 1 10 Remo ve 2020- - _ I - 2020_ _ 2353 _ Deddsa 0, 11 I 0f3at e - 1353 Deciduous ; _i3 068482 2357 D eddaus 9 Of(site 2359 Dedduou__... 13 °Nate 330 1 36 I Remov e 10176 Dodd ous 10 R em ove 2137 1138 3139 1140 2141 De ciduou s 1 _12 Remove Detld s 15 Rem ove- De ciduou s j 12 Remove De ciduous '_ 12 Remove Deddu14 12 Re move w 2028 Decduou s ' 10 Remo ve 1695 Deciduous 11 Save 2020_ 10177 _ Decidu ous 40 R emove _ _ 10785 D eciduous 12 Remo ve 1029 D,cduous•15 3(91 Deciduous 2181 Deciduo us 2132 Decidu ous 10 8 12 Remove _ Remove 0 move Remove _ 2020- 3697 Deciduous 50 Save 1699 De ciduo us 11 i White 1701 _ . .. Deciduous ___ 10 __ -Save 1703 Decidu ous 12 Save tom Deciduous 10287 - Decid uous 10288 Deciduous 12 Remove i_ _ .. .. 20 Remove 18 Remo ve 10178 1017 10180 D ecidu ous % IB Rem ove Deddu s 9 Remove 0 ,3960.05 , 9 R emo. _ 10181 Decidu ous 9 Remove 10 3E1 - Deciduous I 8 Remove _Dedauous 2396 Decidu ous 1] 12 1 Re mov e 2142 Deci duous 1 15 Re move 2 83 Decduo us 12 Remove J _ 1705 De ciduo us 31 Save 10182 131343 10184 f0]ffi Decidu ous 9 Remove D etld 10 .-._ Redo. Decidu ous 8 Rem ove D ecidu ou s 9 .. Re move 1050 Detldu ou 1 10 %move I -. I 1 I % I_ . I _ 1 2143 Dec iduous 1 12 Re mo ve _ 2387 Decid uous 15 Remove 1707 De ciduou s 10 • Save _ 1034 De ciduous 12 Remove 10291 Oe dda 107 92 D ead 11133 Decid uous j ._ 10 Remove_ t ' -- 24 Remove 15 ._..Remove 2144 2145 2146 2147 1148 49 1189 2150 2157 1 2157 2153 2154 2155 -. 2156 2157 2158 2360 2761 2162 2163 2]64 200105 2165 2]66. 3]b] 2167 21920. Z13 217 2171 2172 2173 2174 2175 2176 2177 327178 2179 2180 2181 2192 2183 218 2185 2186 2187 Detld s 1 15 Rem ove Deciduou s 15 Re mov e Dec iduou s : 15 Re move De4a s 15 Re mo ve Dec iduou su Re mov e l_ Dead s 15 Rem o De ciduou s I 24 Re mo ve Dec iduo us' 24 - Remo ve Dec iduous: i 12 Rem ove Dec iduous I IS Remov e - Deade eas ! 15 Remo ve Deciduous 12 Re move D etld o us. I 12 Remov e Ded auous. 1.- ]B Remove De tld Ius 1 15 Remove 0.44000 , 12 Remmove i DeciDeciduo usdus440444 12 Peme Deciduous j 12 Remove Deciduou s 1 12 Remove Deciduou s ! 12 Remove Deciduous 12 Remov e • Deciduo us 12 Remove Deciduou s Decidu ou s I I5 Remov e 18 Remov e Dead ou u �, 12 Remov e Deciduo us IS Rem ove oeuduoes 1 24 Remove D eciduo us j 30 Remove Goa d Remo ve 1 10 Remo D etld o us 4 i 10 Remov e D ecidu ou s 24 Remove De dduou t I 10 Remove Dea d 1 -_ 12 Remove De ciduou s I 12 Remove Ded s I 12 Remove Deciduo us ; 12 Remove Dead s : 8 _Remove Oedeuo0 3 j 8 Remove Deciduous 10 Remove � - 20. __20 Dec iduous i 24 Remove Deciduo us 1 12 Remove Deciduou s I 12 Re move D eciduous % 12 Remove 733 O ctlda u , 36 _ 2391 Ded dro 12 I 12.__ 7392 Decid uous i 2393 D eciduous 1 _ 12 z39{ Deciduo us � 12 23% Decidu ous I -117 2398 Deciduous 1 12 10082 Deadaa 1 26 . ._1108 3 Deciduous 1 24 10084 Deciduous i 8 1Doas Deddous 20 ]0096 D dduo8 2020 _820 70087 Deciduous , B 4 ]OOBB Deddaus j 20 Remove Remov e Remove I Remove Rem ove Remo. e Remov e %move Remov e Remove Rem ov e Remo ve .__- T e % -_ - I Rem ov e 1709 Deaeuaus 19 Sav e 1711 Deciduous - 14 1 Save 1713 Deciduo us 10 Orate 1715 20 20 De ciduou s_.- 11 Save 20M 2020 v17 D eciduo us 9 � Mate 1719 Deciduou s 11 save 1711 Deciduo us ' 36 j Save 1711 1723 D ecidu ou s 10 Save ._ 1725 De ciduou s 10 y Save 1727 Deciduou s 26 iSae 2020 - 175 Dead ous 19 orate 1731 Deciduou s 29 Save __. -. _. 1733 Deciduo us 11 1Sa ve . S 1735 De ciduou s 13 ;. Save 1737 Decidu ou s 29 j Save - 17De ciduou s 10 1 Sme 1711 Deciduou s 10 I Sav e 1143 Deciduous 13 ; Save 1745 De ciduous_ 13 1 %fete 1747 De ciduous 12 1 ONsite - 43, 1769 D ec iduous 13 � OMslte 1751 Deciduous 18 Save 1153 Deciduous 13 • Save 1755 De ciduous 9 Save Save 1757 Deciduou s 20 �' -. . _ 1759 De ciduous 10 I OHtlte 1761 De ciduous 8 I Save 1763 De ciduou s 8 Save 1765 De ciduous M i Save 1767 De ciduous 11 :, %idte 1769 De ciduous 8 Save 177 De ciduou s 12 I Save 177 De ciduous 14 I Save 1775 2020 Deciduous . 8 1 Save _..._. 1777 Deciduous 13 ! O Nslrc 1779 Dec iduous 22 I Save 171 Deciduou s ; ;. 10 I O xsite 1783 De duous 9 Save 1785 De ciduous - 10 Save 1787 Dec iduou s 10 Sa ve -.. 7)89 Dec iduous 30 d Save 1791 De ciduous 20 Save 1793 Deciduous 10 ; 068,3 a 1795 Deciduo us 8 ONslte . 2020. 2020 2020- 2020- 20955 Deciduou s 1 18 2036 Decidu ous 30 . 2037 Deciduou s 8 2038 Deciduous 3 17 '2020-- -' z� De cidu ou s 10 Re mo ve Re ova _.. Re o va Re mo ve 2020 Re ow 10186 w1a/ wise 10189 10190 10191 M190 D ecidu ous 15 Remove Dena i to Rem ove D ecidu ous ss R emove Deciduous 117 R emov e Decidu ous 10 Remove - Decidu ous 18 Re move Deciduous 13 R em ove 1®4 Deciduous 1 12 Remo ve loss Dedaams _ 36 Remo ve 10296 Decid uous 01247 D ecidu ous i 1058 Decidu ous 10299 D eciduousI-_-12 10300 D eciduous j 15 Remo ve 10 I R move . 15 Remo ve Rem ove 10 Remo ve zoao Deedu ods ' >e I 2071 Ded0uous I 18 203z Deciduou s 72 1 2043 Deciduou s 15 I 0 44 2044 Decidu ous 10 - - 2045 Deciduou s 10 2046 De ciduous 10 2047 Decide.. 10 2008 Deciduous I 10 2049 Deciduo us 15 ffi1 0,6400 s 10 20__20id : 1(S2 _ Deciduous I 15 -1Remo ve 2053 Deciduous 8 2054 Deciduou s 24 % Deciduous 2OS5 Detld 8 4- 12 2056 Detld 2057 De ciduou s 15 -_ 1058 Decidu ou s 10 259 Deciduous 12 1 2060 Deciduou s 12 ! 1061 Deciduou s - 12 2062 Decidu ous 12 2063 Deciduous H 2064 Deciduous , 42 2065 Dec iduou s 18 j 2 56 Oeddue . 2 10 2067 Deciduou s : 15 2(66 Deciduou s � 24 - 2070 Deci duous 12 2171 Deciduou s ; 12 2072 0,640, us I 12 .., 2073 0.6400 18 2074 Ded4uou 12 j 2075 Deciduous 12 2776 De ciduou s 12 271 De ciduous 12 2778 De ciduou s 12 2079 Dec iduous 15 319] Della 10 -.- - 3i geDe ciduousH 20 312020 _, 2031 Deciduous 8 Remove Remove Remove Remov e Remove Re move Remo ve .9 - Re move Remove Remo ve Remove Remove Remove %owe Re move Re mo ve Remove %mo ve Pe mwe Remove Remove Remove Remove Remo ve Remove Remo ve Re mo ve Remove - - Remo ve Remove 1 Remove Remo ve Remove Re move Remove Remove Re move Remov e Remove Remove Remov e 10301 D eoa ut 10300 Oeow dw 10303 Oedd us - 10301 Deciduous1 24 Remove M RRemov e 10 Remo ve 15 Remove 10143 10191 2020 10195 10196 2020 10197 - -_ ]0198 101% 10203_ 10211 10210 I@us .- ]0731 10205 1leadv arm _ 15 Remove D ecidu ous . 12 R em ove Deciduo us Rem ove owe Deciduo us , 15 Remove - - D eciduous 8 _ Rem ove Deciduous 10 Rem ote D eciduo us : 24 Rem ove Deciduous Rem o. du, _ 18 Rem o Deciduous ' 18 Remove D eaduaus '. 12 Remo ve Deciduous : H Re new _ .- -. .. Decidu ous 12 Remo ve Decidu ous 6 Rem ove 10305 Deciduous .._ 10306 Deciduous 10307 Deciduous 108 D eciduous 10339 Deciduo us 10310 Deciduous _ 1 0111 Oeddsou s j 10311 Detldaus _i 10313 Deciduous 1314 Deciduous 10315 Deciduous - 10316 Decid uous 10317 Deciduous - 1818 Deciduous .1819 ... . Decidu ous 10320 Decid uous 2020 10321 Decidu ous I 10322 Deciduous 10323 Deciduous 1032120 10324 Oedduow 1825 Decidu ous 10326 Decid uous 1827 M dduous 10328 De ddume 185 0< ad uo 10330 Demou _._ 13337 Decidu ous 10332 Deciduous _ 10333 _ _ Deciduous 10334 Deciduous 10w 335 Deciduous 111335 12 Remov e .. ! ]0 Remov e 1 12 Remove 20 20-- 1 12 Rowe 1 15 Remove 12 Remove 8 • Rem ov e 3 2020 Remo ve I 24 _ Remo ve 1 12 Remove 4 Rem ove 12 Rem ove 12 %mo ve 12 Rem ove 12 Rem ov e _ 6 Remo ve 12 Remo ve 1 12 Remove 1 12 Rem ove 1 12 Rem ove 12 Rem ov e 12 Remove 12 Remove 10 Remo ve 20 20 _10 Remove 10 Rem ov e 10 Remo ve ' 12 Remove 10 Remove II Remove 15 Rame 10%9 Deciduous 1 23 Remov -- f :Rem ov e 15 Rertuore 10091 Deddaus I 18 % Remove 10 8au 2 Dedds 1 ]D Remove 10093. Deddaus _8 Rem ove 10094 Dedduo s 1 12 I Remove 10O b Deciduous I 48 Remove De Decidu ous e 100% I 12 Pemove ]0047 Deciduous i 10 Remove 10096 Detldqus 1 15 Remove _. . ]0099 Deciduous 1 12 Remove - Ig1W Deciduous 1 24 Remo ve 30101 MOM... 1 ]8 Re mo ve 13180 DeRemo . a d.. 1 18 Remo 1328 Deciduo us 1 12 1 Remo ve 10104 Deddu o 1 12 Remove 101% Deciduous i 12 Remove 1010 1 Decduous i 18 Remove IDI07 Dedd qus 1 12 Remove 10103 Deciduous . 22 Remove - - 10109 Deciduous I D Rem ove 10110 000daus 1 12 Rem ove 10111 Deciduous 1 8 Remo ve 20112 Deodaus , 36 Remo ve 10113 Deciduous 10 Remo . 10114 Deciduo us 12 Rem ove 70706 10 - ]OED - 1020 3 ]D203� 10210 10211 10212 10213 10214 10215 10216 10217 10218 10219 10220 10221 10222 13323 10224 10225 .- 10726 10227 Decidu ous - 8 Remove - Detld o us 12 '. %move De d ous 27 Rem ove .. 00 440001 8 Rem ove De ciduo us : 16 ' Remove De ciduous '. 12 - Rem ove 0,0640001 16 _ Remo ve De ciduo us 16 Rem ove 1 De ciduo us , 10 R emove De ciduo us 8 Remo ve De dueu . 8Remove De ciduous 8 Rem. De ciduo us 22 Remove De4duo us ' 12 Re move Dead s - 8 _ Re move De ciduou s 10 Remove Dec iduous 2{ Remove DeaRemove 8 Remove De ciduou s - 8 Remove 0, 0640ous 10 _ Remove 2020._ Deciduou s 36 Remove Saw Deciduous 12 Sa 10115 Deddaus ]5 Remove 10116 Decduous 1 8 Remov e 10117 Deciduou s 12 Remove ,.. .. - 10118 Dedda ; 12 1 Sav e 2]88 1]89 2190 C ed e... Remove 10 R<me Re move D eciduou s 1 s 10 Re� D eciduo us 1 18 Remo ve 10 319 Deciduo us a 10120 Deciduous 36 Save ][I Orate 10121 De ciduo us 1 10 Orate 177 D eciduous 13 OHilte 1191 10778 1025 Deaduo us 18 (Rta%o te De ciduou s 18 083010 3.0%7 10336 Deciduo us 183 Deaeu ous 12 we I 10 Remo ve 1799 De ' Deciduous 30 • Sa ve � - - 1801 De ciduous 8 '.. Save TREE INVENTORY/PRESERVATION TOTALS TOTAL EXISTING TREES SUR VEYED 9506' TREES OFFSITE 1904 ' TOTAL TREES ONSITE 7602' TREES SAVED 1485 ' TREES REMO VED 6117' PERCENT REMOVAL 81 % ALLOWED PER CITY C ODE 20 %=1400 ' REQUIRED REPLACEMENT PER CO DE 4717 ' NOTES 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION TAKEN FRO M B OUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PERFOR MED BY EVS, INC., EDEN PRAI RIE, MN, EXP RESSLY FOR THIS PROJECT , UTILITY LOC ATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION . IF ANY DISCREPANCIES A RE NOTED, THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHOULD BE I MMEDIATEL Y NOTIFIED FOR RESOLUTION . 2. CONTRACT OR IS TO CONTACT 811 FOR UTILITY LOCATI ONS - 48 HOURS PRI OR TO EXCAVATION 5 CONSTRUCTION. ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENT AL PL ANNING EVS, INC. 10250 Valley Vi ew R oad, Suite 123 Ed en Prairie, Minne sota 55344 Ph on e: 952-646-0236 Fax: 952446 -0290 W W W.evsang.som City of Medina, MN 2052 C ou nty Ro ad 24 Medina, Mlnnasota 55340 Phone: 783173.4643 Fax: 763473-9359 www.elm edine.m n.us Prelim . Plat Plans Sept . 21, 2012 P ROJ ECT Fields of Medina West LOCATI ON Medina, MN SHE ET PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERV ATION PL AN # DATE REVISION A 9/21/12 Prelimi nary Plat Plans I HER EBY CERTIFY THA T T HIS PLAN, SP ECI FI CATION, OR REPOR T WAS PREPARE D BY ME OR UNDER MY DIREC T SUPERVISI ON AN D THA T I AM A DULY LICENS ED PROFESSIONA L ENGIN EER UN DER THE LAWS OF 723E STA TE OF MINN ESOTA . David N ash DATE 9/ 2112012 REGISTR ATION NUMBER 21836 DRAWN BY C HECKED BY BJ - DS DN DATE P ROJ ECT# 9.21.2012 2012-039.1 SHE ET NUMB ER C102 F 0 5. 1- T- 5' NOTE: DRA INA GE AND UTILITY EASEM ENT 1.0' ABOVE HWL OVER A LL STORM PONDS DRAINA GE AND UTILITY EA SEMENT POND C NWL=983.0 HWL=986.7 86-18 CURB 8 GUTTER LOT NUM BER 5' SIDE YA RD SETBACK SUGGESTED GARAGE LO CATION GARAGE ELEV IF STEPS REQUIRED FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIO N 0.5 1 1.0 TYPICAL LO T 555,1915 SURMOUN TABLE CURB 8 GUTTER 'STOP' SIGN 55E5005 3 1003 0 25' REAR YARD SETBACK (TYP. ) LO T A REA 10' SIDE YAR D SETBA CK G ROUND ELEVATION LO WEST FLOOR ELEVATIO N STRUC TU RE TYPE (SEE BELO W) BUILDING PAD NO. OF STEPS (IF REQUIRED) G RADE AT FRONT OF HOUSE 25' FRONT YARD SETBACK (TYP. ) 5, 5-905 1003 6 10060 L55-1157 5 1006 5 1,55995 N89° 25' 35"E 1345. 47 STREET SIGN R15"STOP' SIGN CAVANAUGH TRAIL iTREETLIGHT- '-- URMOUNTABLE - CUftB 8 GUTTER J 5,551001 0 C AVANA 10102 0 LTO 1, 55 1003 0 SINGLE FAMILY SITE DEVELO PM ENT SUMM ARY 1.0 100 3 9 7 1. 555 1004 0 PO ND B 1 NWL=996. 0 1 HWL=999.1 BOULDER RETAINING WALL 555• 1055 0 0 o 5 1-5551. 1.1 M EANDER ROAD 55551001 1.1 1.- 150 6 1010 5 555510079 1016/ -1 STREET STREET SIGN �� + 'STOP SIGN 8 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 2 10055 GRO SS SITE = LESS WETLAND 41 = LESS 20' BUFFER (OU TSIDE PARK DEDICATION) = LESS WETLA ND 02 = LESS PA RKLA ND DEDICATION = 22.86 AC 0.96 AC 0. 07 AC 0.19 AC 3.11 AC NET SITE AREA 18.53 AC DENSITY = RED DENSITY = R = RAMBLER. GRAD ED FOR 9' D IFFER ENCE FRO M TH E BA SEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GRADE ELEVA TION AT GARAGE. LO = FU LL BA SEMEN T LO OKOU T, SIDE LOO KOUT. GRADED FOR 00 OF DIFFERENCE F ROM TH E LOOKOUT GRADE ELEVATION TO FRONT GRADE ELEVATIO N AT GARAGE. WO = FULL BASEM ENT WALKO UT. GRA DED FORT OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE B45E ME NT FLOOR ELEVATIO N TO FRONT GRADE ELEV ATION AT GARAGE. (1) = 1 STEP 10.6) UP FR OM GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION TO FIRST FL OOR ELEV ATI ON. (2) = 2 STEPS (17) UP FROM GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION TO FIRST FLOO R ELEVATI ON . LOT SUMM ARY MINIM UM LOT SIZE 8000 SF M INIM UM LOT WIDTH 60 FT TYP ., 80 FT CORNER LOTS MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 90 FT M AXIM UM IMPER VIOUS C OVERAGE 50 % OF TOT AL LOT AREA MINIMUM FROM COLLECTOR ROADWAY 35 FT NUMBER OF L OTS 65 UNITS DENSITY 3 .51 UNITS/AC 3.5 U/AC 64.85 UNITS SETBACKS ME ANDER R OAD FRONT YARD SIDE Y ARD REAR YARD MINIMUM WETLAND BUFFER MINI MU M STRUCTURE SETBACK ZONING EXISTING ZO NI NG PROPOSED Z ONIN G 35 FT 25 FT (30 FT FOR GARAGE) 15 FT TOTAL (ONE SIDE 10 FT) 25 FT 20 FT 15 FT RURAL RESIDENTIAL -URBAN RESERVE R-2 PARK DEDI CATION C ALCULATION GROSS SITE = LESS WETLAND41 4 - LESS WETL AND 82 = NET SITE AREA = 10% PA RK DEDICATION REQUIREMENT PARK LAND PROVIDED ( OUTLOT A - WETLAND 91) _ 22.86 AC 0.96 AC 0.19 AC 21 .71 AC 21.71/10=2.17 AC 3.11 AC 1 'STOP' SI GN ( 10' BIT. TRAIL NOTES LEGEND B6-1 CURB G ER SEE OTE 7 5b MONUMENT SIG N 10' BIT. TR AIL 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB UNLESS N OTED OTHERWISE. BACK OF CURB IS SHOWN GR APHIC ALLY O NLY. 3. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FO OT. 4. REFER TO PRELI MINARY PL AT F OR ADDITI ONAL I NFORM ATION ON LOT B OUNDARIES, L OT NU MBERS. L OT AREAS AND LOT DIMENSIONS. 5. STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPR OVAL BY T HE CIT Y. 6. DR AI NAGE AND UTILI TY EASEMENTS S HALL BE P ROVIDED AS REQUIRED. DRAIN AGE AND UTILITY E ASE MENTS WILL BE P ROVI DE D O VE R ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES AND UP TO ONE (1) FO OT AB OVE T HE HI GH WATER LEVEL OF ALL PONDS. 7. D ROP BACK OF CURB IN FULL RADIUS LENGT H OF CENTER ISLAND. 8. TRANSITION TO 'B' CURB FOR CATCH BASINS AL ONG SU RMO UNTABLE CURB A RE AS. OUTLOT A 4.07 AC BOULDER RETAINING WALL 736 .55 so d : DEN OTES STREET LIGHT - o- : DEN OTES STOP SIGN o : DENOTES STREET SIGN 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, IN C. 10250 Valley Vi ew R oad, Suit e 123 Eden Prairie, Mi nn esota 55344 Pho ne, 952-646-0236 Fax: 952-646-0290 www.e vs- eng.c om 1 T Y O A MEDINA City of M edin a, MN 2052 C ounty R oad 24 Medina, Mi nnesot a 55340 Phone: 7634734643 F ax: 763-473-9359 www .ei .medinaann .us Prelim. Plat Plans Sept . 21, 2012 PROJEC T Fields of Medina West LOCATI ON Medina, MN S HE ET PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN # D ATE RE VISION A 9/21/12 Prelimin ary Pl at Plans 1 H EREB Y CER TIFY THAT THIS PLAN, S PECIFI CA TI ON, OR REP ORT WAS PREPARE D BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPER VISION AND THAT I AM A DU LY LICENSED PR OFESSION AL ENGINE ER UNDER THE LAWS OF T HE S TATE OF MINN ESOT A. David David Nash DA TE 9/ 21/ 2012 RE GISTRA TION NUMBER 21838 DRAWN BY CHE CKED BY BJ - DS DN D ATE PR OJE CT # 9.21 .2012 2012-039.1 SHEET NUMB ER C201 1I \LV 9053 r OUTLOT C 0 .85 AC 04 SF 8009 SF 8001 SF 16 8001 Sr 9515 SF 14 14836 SF SING LE FAMILY SITE DEVELOPM ENT SUMMARY s2 13 17233 SF '--FOUND IP MARKED RLS 12755 5 _L 1 NOTE: DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 1.0' ABOVE HWL OVER ALL STORM PONDS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY 60' 8905 SF 8597 5= 8923 SF 7 9059 SF N89 25 35 E 1345 47 6 8835 SF 8388 SF 6'37 SF 1343.02 589 02' 37 "\N 8125 SF PROPOSED 60' ROADWAY EASEMENT\ GROSS SITE = LESS WETLAND #1 = LESS 20' BUFFER (OUTSIDE PARK DEDICA TION) _ LESS WETLAND 82 = LESS PAR KLA ND DED ICATION = 22.86 AC LOT SUMMARY 0. 96 AC 0. 07 AC 0.19 AC 3. 11 AC NET SITE AREA= 18.53 AC DENSITY = REQ DENSITY = MINIMUM LOT SIZE 8000 SF M INIMUM LOT WIDTH 60 FT TY P., 80 FT COR NER LOTS M INIM UM LOT DEPTH 90 FT MA XIMUM IMPERVIO US C OV ERAG E 50% OF TOTAL LOT ARE A M INIM UM FROM COLLECTOR ROADWAY 35 FT NUMBER OF LOTS 65 UNITS DENSITY 3.51 UNITS/AC 3. 5 U/AC 64.85 UNITS SETBACKS MEANDER RO AD FRONT YARD SIDE YARD REAR YARD MINIMUM W ETLA ND SETBA CK MINIMUM WETLAND BUFFER 35 FT 25 FT (30 FT FOR GA RAGE) 15 FT TO TAL (ONE SIDE 10 FT) 25 FT 15 FT 20 FT ZONING EXISTING ZONING RURAL RESIDENTIAL -URBAN RESERVE PROPO SED ZONING R-2 PARK DEDICATION CALCULATION GR OSS SITE _ LESS WETLAND 81 = LESS WETLAND #2 = NET SITE AREA = 10% PARK D EDIC ATION REQUIREMENT PARK LAND PROVIDED (OUTLOT A - WETLAND 81) _ 22.86 AC 0.96 AC 0.19 AC 21.71 AC 21. 71/10= 2.17 AC 3. 11 AC 10 9 385/ Si 8 '2669 Si 8221 SF 6 8,94 SF 8677 SF 2 9 750 SF 10368 S6 ORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 582.40 FEET OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 2, TWP. 118 N ., RGE . 23 W. Description of Property Surveyed (Per Exhibit A of Stew art Tol e Guara nty Company Tele Commitment N o. 1010016, dated July 24, 2012) That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, H ennepin Co unty , Mi nnesota, which lies N ortherly of the S outh erly 582.40 f eet th er eof. OUTLOT A 4 .07 AC 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET q/ ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, I NC . 10250 Valley View Road, Suite 123 Ed en Pr airi e, Mi nnes ota 55344 Phone: 952-646-0236 Fax: 952-646-0290 www. evs-eng .c om s Y O (IF4 MEDINA City of Medina, MN 2052 C ounty Road 24 Medi na, Minnes ota 55340 Phone: 763-473-4643 F ax: 763-473.9359 www.cl.medi na.mn.us Prelim . Plat Plans Sept . 21, 2012 P ROJ EC T Fields of Medina West LO CATION Medina, MN SH EET PRELI MINARY PLAT # DAT E R EVISION A 9/21/12 Preliminary Plat Pla ns I HEREBY CER TIFY THA T THIS PLAN, SP ECIFICA TION, OR REPORT W AS PREPARED BY ME OR UND ER MY DIRECT SUP ERVISION AND THA T 1 AM A DULY LIC ENSE D PR OFESSION AL ENGIN EER UND ER THE LAWS OF THE S TAT E OF MINN ESOTA Da vid Nash h D AT E 9/ 21/ 2012 R EGISTRATI ON N UMBER 21936 DRAWN BY CHEC KE D BY BJ - DS DN D ATE P ROJEC T # 9 .21 .2012 2012.039.1 SHEET NUMBER C301 EASEMENT -TYPICAL \ 1 PO\ I NWL=9 HWL49 S8LT FENCE / \ / / / I I / / / / / / / / s /— / / // 2Th / / 9 / / � I r �( / /e / / /) GRADING NOTES / IWIJO 10°3.8° "®- � _ t® N. /�_ _ •, •. py 70 1007.59 0.6% 700j 89 i'.. �— 5 t� N 0 l � �� 7 100 101 5 _ f0fer/ /�.O1I91 �.1�P3®®l9B �iYa�I'A� 1110 �i[J( �\ • w ooh I— I�� I 11�� . -, I j � ��c"'i r-�+►�ar�-�� _ �lr � 1 ooz � � �Iw_ r' \: I I 0111310LIt8 � � y 6 �� 'l � �8 g96 �,o°B. m :IOU 1..111 '. 7.• "Im ,o°e:aB I 411 311Vsw VP:*Amil** ���IIIIIIIII�� r iN r a e 5.0% � 1r r. 74 zN , z« rI ' —' --- UP. .32 UN: :7 itr d2. � 'ri��•' ,��\•fib \� $a / rte_ rrarlra 11161111111L4461"1111 �. �00a0 1001 I0 .— ._ OW�1004.10 �I '� —1rr r. 'r , 100 525 100 00 X35 50 _. EOF �M�aMt�ii► —_2.7% r. _ / , T t '� —100 ,75 • 35 A.r .n ;2 • 1 A 1 _1.5% 33 5, 1.2' . 33 00 r2t r _ 32 1 r - F �, 1 , 1�`�° r I r 24 50 2 -- _—_ �� -100 .r. — 1tr .25 1� rrr r err .90 1rr .41 1rI .45 trr .5rr tr 1,1 1rI .3' _. 100 .69 10 1r ' aI 1. PR OPO SED CO NTO URS ARE TO FIN ISH ED SURFACE ELEVATIO N. SPOT ELEVATION S ALONG PRO PO SED CUR B DENO TE FLOWLINE GRADE_ 2. THE CONTRA CTOR SHA LL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIO NS NECESSARY TO A VOID PRO PERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES D UR ING THE CONSTR UCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CO NTRACTO R WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPON SIBLE FOR A NY DAMAGES TO TH E ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PRO JEC T. 3. THE CO NTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GR AD IN G CON STRUCTIO N N A CCORDANCE WITH THE REQ UIREMEN TS OF THE OWNERS SOILS ENGINEER. A LL S OIL TESTING SHA LL BE COM PLETED BY THE O WNERS SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FO R CO ORD INA TING A LL REQU IRED SO IL TESTS AND IN SPECTIONS WITH TH E SO ILS EN GIN EER. 4. THE CON TRACTOR SHALL BE RESPO NSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A ND M AINTAINING TRA FFIC C ON TRO L DEVICES SUCH AS BAR RICAD ES, WAR NIN G SIGN S, D IRECTIONAL SIG NS, FLAGMEN AN D LIGH TS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMEN T OF TRAFFIC WH ERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTR OL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIA TE MINNESO TA DEPAR TMEN T OF TRAN SPORTATIO N STA NDARDS. 5. THE TREES AND OTHER NA TURAL VEGETATION WITH IN TH E PR OJECT AND /OR AD JACENT TO THE PRO JECT ARE OF PRIME CONCERN TO TH E CONTRACTO RS O PERATIONS AND SHA LL BE A R ESTRICTED AREAL HE WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROTECT THE TREES WHICH ARE TO BE SA VED TO BE SURE TH AT THE EQUIPMENT IS NO T NEEDLESSLY OPERA TED UNDER NEA RBY TREES AN D SHALL EXERCISE EXTREM E CAUTION IN WORKING ADJAC EN T TO TREES. SH OULD ANY PO RTION OF THE TREE BRANCHES REQUIRE REM OVAL TO PERM IT OPERATION OF THE CON TRACTOR S E QUIP MENT, HE SH ALL OBTAIN TH E SERVICES OF A PROFESSIONA L TREE TRIM MING SERV ICE TO TR IM TH E TREE S PR IOR TO THE BEGINNING OF OPERATION. SHOULD TH E CO NTRACTORS OPERATIO NS RESULT IN THE BR EAK ING OF AN Y LIM BS, THE BROKEN LIMBS SH OULD BE REMO VED IMMEDIATELY AND CUTS SH ALL BE PROPERLY P ROTECTED TO MIN IMIZE ANY LASTING DAMAGE TO THE TREE. NO TREES SH ALL BE REM OVED WITHOUT AUTHO RIZATION BY THE ENGNEER. COSTS FOR TRIMMING SERVICES SHALL BE CONSIDERED IN CIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTIO N AND NO SPEC IAL PA YMENT WILL BE MADE. RESTRICTED AREAS SHALL INCLUDE ALL DE SIGN ATED TRE ED A REAS O UTSIDE OF THE DESIGNATED CONSTR UCTIO N ZONE. ALL VEGETATION WITHIN THE R ESTR IC TED AR EA S SH ALL R EMA IN. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRICT A LL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTIO N A CTIV ITIE S TO AR EAS DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS. ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION M AY BE RESTRICTED TO A NAR RO WER WIDTH N THE FIELD TO SA VE ADDITIONAL TREES AS DIRECTED BY THE OW NER. ACTIV ITIES PRO HIBITED OU TSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION BOUNDARIES W OULD INCLUDE, BUT NO T BE LIMITED TO : SQL AN D OTHER MA TERIA L STOCKPILING. EQUIPMEN T OR MACHINERY STORA GE. DRIVING Of A NY VEHIC LE, LEAKAG E OR SPILLAGE OF ANY 'WA SHO UT' OR OTHER TOXIC MA TERIAL. THE COLLECTION OF O THER DEBR IS AND SOIL STOCKPILING WILL BE IN AN AREA DETERM INED ON -SITE BY THE EN GINEER. ALL RESTRICTED AR EAS SHALL BE FENCED OFF WITH BRIGHT ORANGE POLYETHYLENE SAFETY NETTING AND STEEL STAK ES AS SHOWN ON THE TREE PROTECTI ON DETAIL . AT NO TIME SHALL THIS FENCING BE REMOVED OR A CTIVITY OF ANY KIND TAKE PLACE W ITH N IT. FINAL PLACEMENT OF PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL BE COMPLETE BEFORE ANY W ORK COM MENCES ORSITE. BEFO RE COMM ENCING WITH ANY EXCAVATION THE C ONTR ACTO R SMALL C OMPLETE ALL P REPA RA TO RY WORK REGAR DING TREE REMOVAL, ROOT PRUNING, TREE PRUNING AND ST UMP REMOVAL TO THE SA TISFACTION OF THE OWNER. PREPARA TOR Y WORK SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWI NG AND SHALL BE COMPLETED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPER VISION OF THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE: 5 1. TREE R EMOV AL: THE CONTRACT OR SHALL FELL THE TREES. AT NO TIME SH ALL TREES BE BULLDOZED OUT. BUT SHALL BE CUT D OW N AND STUMPS RE MOVED SEPARATELY . PRIOR TO T HE FELLIN G OF ALL TREES. PROPER REM OV AL OF A PO RTION OR ALL OF THE CANOPY SHALL BE COMPLETED SO THAT TREES IN T HE RESTRICTED AREAS SHALL NOT BE INJURED IN THE PROCESS. 5. 2. RO OT PRUNING: BEFORE ANY STUMPS ARE TO BE RE MOVED. A LL R OOTS SH ALL BE SEV ERED FRO M ROOTS N T HE RESTRICTED AREAS BV SAW CUTTING WITH A VERMEER DESIGNED F OR RO OT PRUNI NG. BY HA ND, OR WITH A CM AINS AW. TREE ROOTS PROJECTING INTO THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE S HALL BE EXP OSED P RIO R TO ROOT PRU NING WITH S MALL M ACHINERY. I.E . BOBCAT . 5 .3 . STUMP RE MOVAL: AT SUC H TIME THAT ROOTS HA VE BEE N PROPERLY SEVERED. STUMPS MAY BE REMOVED. WHERE RE MOVAL OF CE RTAIN STUM PS COULD CAUSE DAMAGE TO EXISTING PROTECTED TREES, TREE STUMPS SHALL BE GROUND OUT ALL STUMP REM OVAL SHALL BE U NDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. 54. TREE PRIMING: PR OPER PRU NI NG OF T REES IN THE RESTRICTED ZONE SHALL BE DIRECTE D BY AN D SUPERVISI ON AT ALL TIMES BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. REP RESENT ATIVE. NATURAL GROUND C OVER WILL BE MAINTAINED WHEREVER POSSIBLE. THE USE OF RETAINING WALLS NE AR TREES, IN ADDITION TO THOSE REQUIRED ON THE PLANS . SHALL BE DETERMINED IN T HE FIELD BAS ED ON TREE L OCATIONS AND TOPOGRAPHY. 6 IF THE C ONTR ACT OR E NCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEE R WIT H THE LOCATI ON, SIZE , INVE RT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE TILE SHALL BE B ACKFIRED WITHOUT REVIEW, DISCUSSI ON A710 AP PROVAL F RO M THE PROJECT ENGINEER. 7. C ONCRETE SUPPLIERS SERVING THE SITE ARE REQUIRED TO HA UL ALL CONCRETE WASTE A ND W ASH Of S. 8 ER OSION CO NTROL BLANKET ON ALL SLOPES GREATER THA N 3:1. 9. ALL RET AINING WALLS TALLER THAN 4 FEET SHALL BE DESIGNE D BY A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER- LEGEND —0-- SILT FENCE ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING E VS, I NC . 10250 Valley View R oad, Suite 123 Eden Pr airie, Min nes ota 55344 Ph one: 952.646-0236 Fax: 952-646-0290 v - eng.c m MEDINA City of M edi na, MN 2052 C ounty R oad 24 Medina, Mi nnes ot a 55340 Pho ne: 763473 .4643 Fax: 763473-9359 www.ci.medina .m n.us Prelim. Plat Plan s Sept. 21, 2012 P ROJ ECT Fields of Medina West LOC ATION Medina, MN SHEET PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN # D ATE REVISI ON A 9/21/12 Prelimi nary Plat Plans 1 H EREBY CE RTIFY TH AT THIS PLAN, SPE CIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UN DER MY DIRECT SUPE RVISI ON AN D THAT I AM A D ULY LICE NSE D PROFESSI ONAL ENGINEER UND ER TH E LAWS OF ES OTA. DATE 9/21/2012 REGISTRA TI ON NUMBER 21836 DRAW N BY CHECKED BY BJ - DS DN DA TE PR OJEC T # 9 .21 .2012 2012-039.1 SHE ET N UMB ER AN OWNE RS . PRESENTATIVE WILL BE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES DURING THE PREPARATORY AND C ONS TRUCTO R PE RI OD. MULCH RATHER THAN SEED OR SOD WILL BE USED AT THE BASE Of QUALITY TREES TO A PERIMETER DETERMINED BY THE OWNE RS REP RESENTATIVE . AREAS TO BE SEEDED F OR EROSION CONTROL PURPOSES WIT HIN THE CONSTR UCTION ZO NE ARE 10 BE DETERMI NED BY THE OWNERS 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET C401 17' (M IN.) (VARIES) ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PL ANNING EVS, INC. 10250 Valley View R oad, Suite 123 Eden Prairie, Mi nnes ota 55344 Ph on e: 952.646-0236 Fax: 952.646-0290 W W W .evs-eng .com 35' 30' Y m 1 GARAGE FL OO R ROW 25 ' FRONT' 10' FINISHED GRADE AFTER H FINISHED GRADE FOR Pi BASEMENT FLOOR (B.5' BELOW GARAG E) SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (TYP.) SINGLE-FAMILY WALK -OUT (WO) ENGINEERED FILL IF REQUIRED (TYP.) 14' LC JUBERT TRAIL SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (TYP.) to o 1T (M IN.) (VARIES) • FRONT SETBA CK IS 30' TO GARAGE 35 , 30 t/ y GARAGE FLOO R rLOO K -OUT OPENING 0.5' TO TO PSOIL (5.9' BELOW GARAGE) BASEMENT FLOO R (8. 5BELOW GARAGE) SUITABLE BEARING SO IL (TYP.) SINGLE-FAM ILY LOOK -OUT (LO) 3' 2%)M114.) 35' 30 25' FR ONT' NOT TO SCALE ROW _. r E JUBERT TRAIL FINISHED GRADE AFTER HOUSE FINISHED GRADE FOR PAD ENGINEERED FILL IF REQ UIRED (TYP.) SUITABLE BE AR ING SOIL (TYP. ) FRONT SETBACK IS 30' TO GA RAGE 25' FRONT• ROW 0' NOT TO SCALE LC JUBERT TRAIL N GARAGE FLOOR FINISHED GRADE AFTER HOUSE FINISHED GRADE FOR P50 BASEMENT FLOO R SUITA BLE BEARING SOIL (TIP.) (8.5' BELOW GARA GE) SINGLE-FAMILY RAMBLER (R) ENGINEERED FILL IF REQUIR ED (TYP.) SUITABLE BEARING SO IL (TYP.) • FRONT SETBACK IS 30' TO GARAGE NOT TO SCALE NOTE PLACE TACK COAT (MND OT 2357) BETWEEN LIFTS 1 5" TYPE WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWE240B) 2.0 ' TYPE NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPNW2308) 12' CLASS 5 AG GRE GATE BASE, 100 % C RUSHED GEOTEXTILE FABRIC • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO APPROVE FINAL SUBGRADE IN THE FIELD BIT . PAVEMENT - RESIDENTIAL NOT TO SCALE NOTE PLACE TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357) BETWEE N LIFTS 2 0' TYPE WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWE230C) 2 0' TYPE NON -WE ARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPNW230C) 18 ' CL ASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE -100 % CRUSHED GEOTEXTILE FABRIC • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO APPROVE FINAL SUBGRADE IN THE FIELD 15)BIT. PAVEMENT - MEANDER ROAD 402 NOT TO SCALE 30' RAN 4'1 4:1 B OULEVARD 2.0% 14' 14' B-018 C ONCRETE CURB 8 G UTTER 2 .0 % 2 .0 % 5' 10' B OULEV ARD 4' PERFOR ATED DRAI NTILE IN FILTER SOCK BEDDED IN PEA ROCK (SEE CITY DET AIL)' SEE MEANDER ROAD SECTI ON ABOVE MEANDER ROAD - TYPICAL SECTION 2.0 % BIT. TR AIL 2.0 % • DRAINTILE INSTALLED 50' EACH SIDE OF LOWPOINTS 25' 25 ' NOT TO SCALE G 5 T Y O A 0(114 MEDINA City o/ M edi na, MN 2052 Cou nty R oad 24 M edin a, Mi nnesot a 55340 Phone: 763-473.4643 F ax: 763-473-9359 www. ci.rnedina.mn .us Prelim . Plat Plans Sept . 21, 2012 PROJECT Fields of Medina West LOC ATION Medin a, MN SHE ET GRADING DETAILS # D ATE REVISION A 9/21/12 Pr elimi nary Plat Pla ns I H EREBY CERTIFY TH AT THIS PLAN, SPECIFIC ATION, OR R EPORT WAS P REPA RED BY ME OR UNDER MY DI REC T SUPERVISION AN D THAT I AM A DU LY LICENS ED PROFESSI ONAL E NGINE ER UND ER THE L AWS OF THE S TATE OF MINNESOTA. David Nash D ATE 9/21/2012 RAN REGIST RATION N UMBER 21836 1' 6' 2 .0% 14' 14' 2.0 % - CONCRETE SIDEWAL K 2.0% S URMOU NT ABLE C ONCRETE CURB 8 GUTTER 2.0 % 2 .0 % 4" PE RFORATED DRAINTILE IN FILTER SOCK BEDDED IN PEA ROCK (SEE CITY DET AIL)' SEE RESIDENTAIL SE CTIO N ABO VE 7 \ RESIDENTIAL - TYPICAL SECTION C402 DRAINTILE INSTALLED 50' EACH SIDE OF LOWPOINTS NOT TO SCALE DRAWN BY CH EC KED BY BJ - DS DN DATE PROJE CT # 9.21.2012 2012-039.1 SH EET N UMBER C402 9053 6' 1n m m O I 1?" I O TLOIrC �.85 pC L PO ND C NWL=983. 0 HWL=986.7 20 / / I L r - S ,17 I .61 I I INV(S)=986.00 �} ---_.. _t t 7 r L 1 L 17 _1J -- I SANMH #11B I� RI -T8 R999.02 INV(N�4. 96 1NV (S)=984.86 / 4/ 15 1J V SANM H#108 RIM=100060 \ INV(E1a 483.72 INV(N)=984. 45 / INV(SW)=983.6 / oj � / QJO / 13 SANS/H#109 +- -R IM=4001, 96 -/ INV(NE)=982. 97 LINV(S)=982. 87 / / / / SANM..1t I#115 IRIM =994.50 I INV (E)=988 0 1 1 2 I I 1 1 I 1 7 - -1 I I --1 1 4 1 L_ J £ 1 '01. 8' PVC @C4 0% J N89 25 35 E 1345.47 I---11E ---1r---ILI--7 1 I1 11 1I I SANM ��MHm N #113 I I 1 1 11 I 1 IV(W)=98721 1 I RN V(E) =99 071 I 8 1 IIN V(S)=987. 101 I 1 IN V(W)=997. 971 I I L_ _ J I-- 9 - �LI I I I JL- -JL 101'-8" PVC 28'-6" PVC-.. 21.-§:_PALC 1/ LI- r- LI r1 II LI r- 5 1 4 J 28'-6' Pl 39'�PVL'/ J J1 _ X5:E "-PVC -� CAVANAUGH T • ' IL 8 1978• PVC - --_ 1 1 I Thr_ I 5 T I I V L I-_-_ _ -J i 6 117 1 4 1 1-1(---•L =-' L- i L �; I I 3 1 1 "S LILI- _ LI____-i1 1 V ' I SANM H#,74 I _ 1RIMr 847�191 _ INV(S)=985. 71 L� e l � 1 AI 15 1 j L_- 1 1 II 14 11 13 Li11 \ � .. . - - - J L 11,7„.. ,, ,,c 1 I _ _ \ PV 11'-8' P VC- / / O UTLOT B / 0.52 AC PO ND B 11 NWL=996.0 HWL=999.1 - i -°=-mow, N7 ii. 373'12 PV'•. 373' -< '-I i 1-1- 1 SANMH:lir 1 -� I- I I- I r - I L----.... -,07 ' 1 1 9 1 I 8 I I RNV(E101 1 _ . ? 1 SA NMH#107 I I 10 I I 1 1 II INV 85081 1 1 1 1 1 I I I �O / RIM =100145 I I 1 1 1 b'/ 12 1 1 i, i,11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 I 1 5 1 1 4 1 1 3 1 ,b/ II 11 i-1��5, Jci__� fit I--i��i--+ ---L____11----- J 1_35. L -J L_- L- J L_ -J L__J 35'-6" PVC I I I 8 II t. - r 1 29'-6' PVC 1 1 10 1J UTILITY NOTES 17 GV AND STUB SEE SHEET C502 31'-12' PVC 1. THE CON TRA CTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CA UTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATIO N OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHO WN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE V AR IO US UTILITY COMPANIES AND, WHERE POSSIBLE, M EASU REM EN TS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATIO N IS N OT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR CO MPLETE. THE CONT RACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIAT E UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE A NY EXCAVA TIO N TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL 8E THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IM PR OV EMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SM ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTO R, BY CALLING GOPHER STATE O NE CALL AT (651) 454-0002. 2. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRA CTORS: IN ACCOR DAN CE WITH G ENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTR UC TION PRA CTICES. THE CONTRACTOR SILL BE SO LELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF A LL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WO RK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUO USLY AND NO T BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WO RKIN G HOU RS. TH E DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELO PER TO CO NDUCT CO NSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACT ORS PERFORM ANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTO R'S SA FETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CO NSTRUCTION SIT E. 3. ALL AR EAS OUTSIDE THE PRO PERTY BOUN DARIES THA T A RE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHA LL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES OF TO PSO IL PLA CED BENEATH THE SO D. ALL MA TERIA LS SHALL BE AS SPEC IFIED IN CEAM SP ECIFICA TIONS EXCEPT AS M ODIFIED HERIN. 1. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREM ENTS OF THE CITY. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR-35, U NLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. ALL WATERMAIN TO BE PVC SDR-26, WITH 7.5 FEET M INIM UM COVER. 4. ALL STOR M SEWER PIPE TO BE R EINFORC ED CONCR ETE PIPE WITH R-0 JOINTS AND RUBBER GASKETS, UNLESS NOTED O THERWISE. 5. RIP -RAP SHALL BE M NOOT CLASS 3. 6. ALL WA TERMA IN SERVICES SHALL BE I INCH HDPE. 7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES TO BE PVC SCHEDULE 40. 8. 4' PER FORATED DRAINTILE TO BE INSTALLED 50' EACH SIDE OF ALL LOW POINTS 9. IRRIG ATION SYSTEM TO BE CONNECTED TO STORM PONDS. FINAL DESIGN TO BE COMPLETED BY IRRIGATION CO NTRACTO R. SANMH#105 RIM=1009.75 `NV(E) 998.68 I `NV(W)=998. 58 1 2 I L_ _ J INV, 1.1007 c� '/1 SANM H#101 RIM= 1015.59 INV(N)- 006.46 < INV(S)%06.35 SANMH#102 RIM=1016.56 IN V(N)=i"5. 9 INV(S)= Si8$ / Y 71 WETLAND 10,344 SQ.FT. I r RMNl0#109 11 1 INV(N)=.93 1 1 INV (SE) 1004.83 4 \. 1oa \ < RSANMIM=1 4.21 \ INV(NW)=1001.42 INV(SE)=999 5 5-1 Y eNO 1 I 1 OUTLOT A 4.07 AC - - _, 1 I / 1 NPON996.0 I I HWL=997.5 A I I I L ` - _ / 736 .55 SO ° 2 S89 02' 37"W MEANDER RO AD 12 ' GV AND STUB 1 - -- 298' -12• FVC 7 GV AND STUB 30'-12PVC -NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 582 .40 FEET OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW LEGEND GAT E VALVE HYDRA NT SA NITA RY MANHOLE W ATERM AI N SANITARY SEWER STOR M SEWER r- 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 4/ ENG INEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC. 10250 Valley Vi ew Road, Suit e 123 Eden Prairi e, Minnes ot a 55344 Ph one: 952-646-0236 Fax: e5s�6-0290 w -eng.c om I T V D A MEDINA City of Medina, MN 2052 County R oad 24 Medina, Minnesota 55340 Ph one: 783.473.4643 Fax: 763-473.9359 www . cli newfi na.mn .us I.medlna.mn .us Prelim . Pl at Plans Sept . 21, 2012 PROJECT Fields of Medina W est LOCATION Medina, MN SHE ET PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN # D ATE RE VISION A 9/21/12 Pr eliminary Plat Plans I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS P LAN, SPE CIFICATI ON, OR REPORT W AS PREPA RED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIR ECT SUPERVISION AND THA T I AM A D ULY LICENSE D PR OFESSIONAL ENGINE ER UN DER THE LAWS OF TH E S TATE OF MINNES OTA. Da vid Nash DATE 9/ 21/ 2012 REGIS TRATION N UMBER 21836 D RAWN BY CH ECKED BY BJ - DS DN DA TE P ROJ EC T # 9 .21.2012 2012-039.1 SH EET NUMBE R C501 0 60 120 SCALE IN FEET UTILITY NOTES X HYD •wM ' ONNECT TO EXISTING 12' STUB LEGEND DIRECTI ONAL BORE • GA TE V ALVE HYDRANT SANITA RY MANHOLE WA TERMAIN SANITARY SEWER STO RM SEWER 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LO CATION A ND/O R ELEVA TION OF EXISTIN G UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLA NS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND, WHERE POSSIBLE. MEASUREMENTS TA KEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORM ATIO N IS N OT TO BE R ELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COM PLETE. THE CONTRA CTOR MUST CALL THE APPRO PRIATE U TILITY COM PANY AT LEA ST 4B H OUR S BEFOR E A NY EXCA VA TION TO R EQUEST EXA CT FIELD LOCATIO N OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CON TRACTO R TO RELO CATE ALL EXISTIN G U TILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PRO PO SED IM PROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIO NS OF SMA LL UTILITIES SHA LL BE OBTA INED BY THE CONTR ACTOR. BY CA LLING GOPHER STATE O NE CALL AT (651)454-0002. 2. SA FETY NO TICE TO CO NTRACTORS: IN A CCO RDA NCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR SILL BE SO LELY AND COMPLETELY RESP ONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JO B SITE, INCLU DING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFO RMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL AP PLY CO NTINU OUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORM AL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CO NSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE C ONTRAC TOR'S PE RFO RMA NCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQ UACY OF THE CONTRACTO R'S SA FETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 3. ALL AREA S OU TSIDE THE PRO PERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UT ILITY CO NSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES OF TO PSOIL PLACED BENEATH THE SO D. ALL M ATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIFIC ATIO NS EXCEPT AS MOD IFIED HERIN. 1. ALL MATER IA LS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREM ENTS OF THE CITY. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR-35, UNLESS NOTED O THERWISE. 3. A LL WATERM AIN TO BE PVC SDR -26. WITH 7.5 FEET MIN IMUM COVER. 4. ALL STO RM SEWER PIPE TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE WITH R-4 JOINTS AND RUBBER GASKETS. UNLESS NOTED OT HERWISE. 5. RIP -RAP SHALL BE MNDOT CLASS 3. 6. A LL WA TERMAIN SERVICES SHALL BE I INCH HOPE. 7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES TO BE PVC SCHEDULE 40. 8. 4" PERFORATED DRA INTILE TO BE INSTA LLED100' EA CH SIDE OF ALL LOW POINTS 9. IRRIGA TIO N SYSTEM TO BE CO NNECTED TO STORM PONDS. FINAL DESIGN TO BE COMPLETED BY IR RIGA TIO N CONTRA CTOR. 10. DEVELO PER SHALL OBTAIN MNDO T 8 CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILROAD PERM ITS FOR OFFSITE U TILITY WORK. 11. DEVELO PER SHALL OBTAIN UTILITY EASEMENT FROM ADJACENT PRO PERTY O WNER. /4- 4- t' 6 7 } SANMH//10Y .96�t9 /RIM-I0B L INV((S}NE)=992,9798 9- JOLV=/ 186+8 CURB `T. f1 Y1) 1't'MtlC .I U R 765 12' 06 meo 31'-12" PVC 4- / 4' 60' UTILITY EASEA9EN 1 L FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT ,38_ ` 54\ EX 5144=991 .61' EX 12" 495-964.6\ 1 • SANMH#110 RIM=1001 .80 INV(N)=981.27 INV(S)=981.17 8=20.6 SANMH#119 RIM= 992.44 INV(N)=979.57 INV(S)=979 .47 8=12.9 235 LF-8 " PVC 0 3 .74% DIRECTIONAL BORE S S3 0 8" PVC 0 3.745 JACKING WITH 16" STEEL CASING 50 LF-8" PVC 0 3.74% EN CUT SANMH#121 RIM=965.69 INV(E)=964.38 Field Verify INV(N)=964.50 CONSTRUCT NEW MANHOLE OVER EXISTING 12 " SANITARY SEWER 99 X/54A,0 ?• SS EX RIM=991.75 EX 12" INV=964 .19 ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EV S, INC . 10250 Valley View Road, S uite 123 Ed en Prairie, Mi nnes ota 55344 Ph one: 952.646-0236 Fax: 952-646-0290 www. evs-e ng.c om MEDINA City of Medi na, MN 2052 C ou nty R oad 24 Medina, Mi nnesot a 55340 Pho ne: 763-473-4643 F ax: 763-473-9359 www.cl.medi na.m n.us Prelim. Plat Plans Sept . 21, 2012 PROJECT Fields of Medina West LOC ATION Medina, MN SH EET PRELIMIN ARY OFFSITE UTILITY PLAN EXTENSIONS # DAT E RE VISION A 9/21/12 Preliminary Mal Plans I HEREB Y CER TIF Y THAT THIS P LAN, S PE CIFICATI ON, OR REPO RT W AS PR EPAR ED BY ME OR UN DER MY DI RECT SUPER VISION AND THA T I AM A DULY LIC ENSED P ROFESSIONAL EN GIN EER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE S TATE OF MINNES OTA. D avid N ash DATE 9/21/2012 REGISTRA TI ON NUMBER 21836 DR AWN BY CHEC KED BY BJ - DS DN DATE PROJECT# 9.21.2012 2012-039.1 SHEET NUMBER C502 32'-1?" R EX. FES 8101 INV (5E/=982. 04 1 UTILITY NOTES 4'-12" PVC EX. FES 1:100 IN V (NW )=981.70 FES 8162 INV (SE)=984.67 CBMH#161 RIM =985.50 = INV: (NW =983. 50 INV (W)=989.59 �- ��- !l 5 7 RCP ' 1 5-12'R X 414° / i% ,, .., - _1- \� j� CBMH#431. \N BRIM 2.05 INV ( )=989.11 i , .5/- I -12' R /;_.. ... /[ - 1 I 1 I C I LI \VII Pc 3. 05/ _.,.. CBM H#12 E)=9 6Q NV (E)-9 NV (N).11. 6. -IIJ\' /I ) / :. �. ( .. '' -''' ' +` (a10. 85% 30'-21' RCP 1.00% CANAUGH _. 6q ...: RIM=1001. 38. =73= dl(=ip73 INV t2(�@311% 1 II >5 2' F4CP I 1 5 IIN. ILL_ J_ I 31'- L Jg @H B _ A � 1 / (- I � =-h-1 CIBBMMH#143 I I 1 INV 11 9 2.68 II $992.68 VIII 71I��IL _1'1 1 ``11 -I� �i 11 1114. I II II I I- --1. - \, i 4 I I III' -L �IL - II' �-_ LI INV I \,L \ ✓ 11 ->`� - -11I I 1 �/ �I1_ '- 7 II e, 3 1 1 1 1/ 111 811111 III' -Lill. _ III 11 Q,I11 11 Ij13 I'r/� I I FES #,4 I som-9-�{rk I JJI 14 I - II -I�i i I� 4'-33'jjGP@8. 26.1 �� T L �I n I I I I 9 1II 1 d 1 1j 11 2 I` itAN� 4� - II I�y r' \1\ \// 1 I iNIM (N9)991 1 N 1 ✓ - it 1 1 I' M 1000. ,6 =99:1 .1 -' ry INV (S) 93.7972 `V/f ) 99957 �40Y, - 6,11 \ CBMH 4 11 \ J I V I, ` -J --, lOpLi�1 46'-27' 89P @ 0.39% 30'-15' RCP @ 0.38% CBMH#122 - RIM=1000. 79 INV (N )=997. 47 ' RCP 00% STMT #1 RIM 1-90998 L 25-12" RCP @0.50% CBMH #150 RIM -1010.70 INV (E)- 06.72 1 44 004.25 INV( )=1011.34 IN 1rr 5 31'-1 B- RCP a 0.5 8MH#117 I/0!001.36 (S)=998.31 \iAEANDER ROAD 25-12 RCP @9-45% 31'-12RCPZ 57A CBMH#116 R1M=1001.36 INV (N)=998.44 THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICA LLY CAU TIO NED THAT THE LOCA TION A ND /O R ELEV ATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON TH ESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIO US UTILITY COM PANIES AND, WHERE POSSIBLE, MEA SUREMEN TS TAKEN 114 THE FIELD. THE INFORM ATIO N IS NO T TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMP LETE. THE CON TRACTOR MU ST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHA LL BE THE RESPONSIB ILITY OF THE CO NTRACTOR TO R ELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PR OPOS ED IMPR OVEM ENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE O BTA INED BY THE CONTRACTOR. BY CALLING GOPHER STATE O NE CALL AT (651) 454-0002. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTR AC TO RS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CO NSTRUCTIO N PRACTICES, THE C ONTRA CTO R SILL BE SO LELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JO B SITE, INCLUD ING SA FETY OF A LL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFOR MANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NO T BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENG INEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CO NDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF TH E CONTRACTOR' S PERFO RM ANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF TH E CO NTRA CTOR'S SAFETY M EASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. ALL AREAS O UTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CO NSTRU CTION SHALL BE RESTOR ED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACE D BENEATH TH E SOD. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED 114 CEAM SPECIFIC ATIONS E XCEP T AS MODIFIED MERIN. 1. ALL MATE RIALS S HALL CO MPLY WITH THE REQUIRE MENTS OF THE CITY. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR-35, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE . 3. ALL W ATERMAIN TO BE PVC SOR-26, WITH 7.5 FEET MINI MU M COVER . 4. ALL STOR M SEWER PIPE TO BE REINFORCED CON CRETE PIPE WITH R-4 JOINTS AND RUBBER GASKETS . UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5. RIP -RAP SHALL BE MND OT CLASS 3. 6. ALL WATERM AIN SERVICES SHALL BE 1 INCH HDPE. 7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES TO BE PVC SCHEDULE 40. 8. 4' PERF ORATED DRAINTILE TO BE INSTALLED 50' EACH SIDE OF ALL LOW POINTS 9. IR RI GATION SYSTEM TO BE CONNECTED TO STORM PONDS. FINAL DESIGN TO BE CO MPLETED BY IRRIGATI ON CONTRACT OR. C 8M H 8151 R1M=1010.70 INV (W)=1006. 58 INV (S)=1006.58 41 4. /J i IY 3 CBJ/ CBM 88 49- PRI M= 2 .88 118, T. -RCP -CD -3330 ii CBMH#175 RIM=1004 52 INV (NW)=1001 .21 INV (E)=1001.21 oy4LOT A -4.07 AC 7) / / 7/ OCS#115 RIM 997_50 _- 1 73,12 ' RCP @..31(_/ CB MH#11 RIM=1002/96 r INV ( N)=7000.29 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET ENG INEERING SURVEYIN G ENVIRONMENT AL PLANNING EVS, INC. 10250 Valley Vi ew R oad, S uite 123 Eden Prairie, Minnes ota 55344 Ph on e: 952-646-0236 Fax: 952-646-0290 www.evs- eng.wm ` 5 T Y °A, MEDINA City of Medina, MN 2052 Cou nty Road 24 Medi na, Min ne sot a 55340 Ph one: 763473.4643 Fax: 763473-9359 www.ci .m edi na.m n.us Prelim. Pl at Pl ans Sept . 21, 2012 PROJE CT Fields of Medina West LO CATI ON Medi na, MN SH EET PRELIMINARY STORM PLAN # DATE R EVISION A 9/21/12 Preliminary Plat Plans I HEREB Y CER TIF Y THA T THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR RE PO RT W AS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIR ECT SUP ER VISION AN D TH AT 1 AM A DULY LIC ENSED P ROFESSI ONAL EN GIN EER UN DER THE LAWS OF TH E S TAT E OF MINNESO TA. David Nash DATE 9/21/2012 REGISTRATI ON N UMBE R 21836 DR AWN BY CHECKE D BY BJ - DS DN DATE PR OJ EC T # 9 .21 .2012 2012-039.1 S HEET N UMBER C503 IAAFt�KED- _ I ILS 9053 %"':.;k"A. 1 f )�/ is / ►,� I I • ii i 47, �! i rPA La rawsi it -7et / / / I / 1/I / / 1/ / / f / I/1 / // /I I %' I / / LANDSCAPE REQUIREM ENTS/CALCULATIO NS /r //// ,•s. .I. Aim : !% III►' Ali �.�s'o, V'� �' LANDSCAPE REQUIR EMENTS TREES PER SF LO T 2 X 65=130 MEANDER RD BUFFER YA RD 12. 6 X 62= 782 PTS (1260 LF/100) REQUIRED TREE REPLACEM ENT to be de te rmined PROPO SED T REES PER CITY CODE TREES PER SF LOT 130 BUFFER YARD POINTS REQ 782 36- 6' EVERGREENS FOR 50 PTS EA 1800 18 - OVERSTO RY TREES FO R 50 PTS EA 900 4- OR NAMENTAL TR EES FOR 15 PTS EA 60 TOTAL BUFFER YARD PTS 2760 BUFFER YARD PTS EXCEEDING REQ 1978 ADDITIO NA L LAND SC APING OU TSIDE OF BUFFER YA RD EXCEEDING CITY CO DE REQ PERIM ETER TREES EVERGREENS 23 ORNAMENTAL 4 OVERSTO RY 21 INTERIOR BLVD TREES 25 ENTRY TREES EVERGREENS 2 ADDITIO NAL BAC KYARD TREES EVERGREENS 16 ORNAM ENTAL 18 / �;�':� mr�s0 — — i� — — — —I �'►i9 q, �.�3�1 r11. ' �,l I-- k 7\ 1 1---- --- 1 Ir_L�I T�'N9• . I\I I `--_ r 1 11 j ---1 1 I— B}N92L f 1 L. 1 4 5 1 6 /I / 7 1 I —8 I I 10 \ IThik•j ft/ Vii. ao - ` / ✓ CAVANAUGH TRi(IL — �� �`�1'Ip� / ( X111 �� Ir .11♦� 1 / �I _ J ti y _1 1), 5 4= 11 —3 1 1 �2 — I I — — J \�' IiI LOS..;�� ,V ,.t17.1104:13, ► •-to —MEANDER ROAD / / -NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY WETLAND 7 / / \1 10,344 SQ.FT. I I O TLOTA I I 07 AC E\\. fi 1 / I - .."/J cnn An rrr r ' NI—ri Ir Cs I— 4 /A nr YV Ir (mil A/ LANDSCAPE LEGEND xEr BO T,AC AL NA ME CO MMON TUNE aar BOTANIC AL N ENE COMM ON NA ME BET BOTANIC, NA ME cosmos HO NE D ECIDU OUS TREES DECIDUO US TREES CD NIFERWS TREES Acer X hee manii'Sie nna ' Sien na Glen Ma le p Tilia am erca na American Lind en Picea belsam ea B als am Fir OPic ea gla ura B ensala Black Hill Spruce ArAk g A cer sazlarum 'Gree n Mo untain Su ga r M aple 8 altiv4rs ( �' ' \vJ Tilia ame ncana'Retlmond Redm ond Lind enn O Pnus sylvestds Au strian Pi ne ('�( 0Vd plaiaraides' Gre en Mou nlairi Green Moun tain Suga r Maple Q uart os tuba NORTHERN RED OAK OR NAMENTAL TREES QA cer Mains Don ald Wym an ' D onald Wym an Crab A /y1 y=�IJr J `�� Belula nigra River Birch 1 P Oue rws ti cobr Swamp Whil e O ak Malus 'Prainfire' Prairiefir e Cr ab �h,jV♦n,r" m (/+_ Am elanchier x gr aidillora Autumn Brillianc e Ser ceb eny N IA Cellis o ccidenta lis Ha ckberry ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC. 10250 Valley Vi ew R oad, Suit e 123 Ed en Prairie Mi nnes ota 55344 Ph one: 952-646-0236 Fax: 952.646-0290 www .evs-eng. com MEDINA City of Medina, MN 2052 C ounty R oad 24 Medina, Mi nnesota 55340 Ph one: 763-473-4643 F ax: 763-473-9359 www .ci.nutdina.mn .us I.medina.mn .us P ROJ EC T LOC ATI ON SH EET PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 D ATE R EVISION A 9/21/12 Preliminary Plat Plans I HEREB Y CERTIFY T HAT THIS PLAN SP ECIFICATION, OR REP OR T W AS PR EP ARE D BY ME OR UN DER MY DIRE CT S UPER VISI ON AND THA T I AM A D ULY LICENSED LAN DSC APE ARCHITE CT UND ER TH E LAWS OF TH E S TATE OF MINNESOTA. Kathlee n O 'Co nn ell D ATE 9/21/ 2012 RE GIS TRATI ON N UMBER 20862 DRAWN HY KO DA TE 03.23.2012 CHECKE D BY KO PROJECT 0 2011-001.1 S HEET NUMB ER L101 OV ERSTO RY 2 TOTAL TREES 111 LANDSCAPE LEGEND KEY B OTANICAL NAIAE COMMON NAM E SIM ROO T O P. REMARKS DE CIDUOU S TREES ,f` �'^�/ \I V Acer X /re emanii'Sien na ' Sien na Glen M aple 2.5' BB 26 ... A cer 54 040alum'Green Mountain' Sugar Ma74e 6 CUI:Ndrs 2. 5' BB 32 IAN Ace r pia/anoldes'Green Mo unta in' GREEN MO UNTAIN SUG ARM APLE 25' BB 12 ` 9I Bet* la nigra RIVER BIRCH BTt BB 9 CLUMP FORM Gletlilsl' a Iria cenl6D s'Skyline' Skyline Ho neylocust 2.0 BB - ,N Ce lls o cd1enlalis Hackberry 2.5' BB - Tilia amedcena Ame rican Linde n 2.0 BB 14 /�`F10 0V Tilia amencana 'Redmo nd, Redmond Linden 2.5' BB 4 4'/ft Gueras 6 66,2 NORTHERN RED OAK 2.0 BB 47 ,1►all l ir Ouercus 610/0 1 Swa mp While Oa k 2.0 BB 21 CO NIFEROUS TREES Picea EaName a Bals am Fir 6 HT. 10 0 Picea glalna densa ta Blac k Hill Spru ce 6' HT. 68 Picea gla uca den sala Brack Rig Spruce 6 HT. - O Pinusngra Austria n Pine 5 HT. 38 Pin es pondero sa Re d Pine 4' H T. - OR NAMENT ..TREES Q Males Do nald Wyman Donald Wyman Cra b 1. 5- BB - 4 M alus' Prairifire P,a defire Crab 1.5- BB 18 Le+ Aln ela nd401 xgrandillora Au tumn Brillia nce Sery ice berry 6161 BB 4 CLUMP FORM X DENOTES TREES EXCEEDING MIN REQ. X4 DENOTES 4' EVERGREEN EXCEEDING M IN REQ 4 DENOTES 4' EVERGREEN 1 SCARIFY BO TTOM AN D SIDES OF H OLE PR IOR TO PLANTING 2. TRIM OUT DEAD WOO D AND WEAK AND /OR DEFO RMED TWIGS. DO NOT CUT A LEADER. DO NOT PAINT CU TS. 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTU RBED NA TIV E SOIL OR THOR OUG HLY CO MPACTED BACKF ILL SO IL. INSTALL PLA NT 50 THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP T0 2 ABOVE THE FIN ISH ED GRA DE. 4. PLACE RANT IN PUNTING HOLE WITH BUR LAP AN D WIR E BA SKET. (IF USED), INTACT. BA CKFILL W ITHN APPRO XIMATELY 12 OF THE TOP OF ROO TBALL, WATER PLANT, R EMO VE TO P 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HOR IZONTAL RINGS, WHICHEVER IS G REATER. REM OVE ALL BURLA P A ND N AILS FROM TOP 1/30F THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. 5. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH BA CKFILL SOIL. 6. WATER TO SETTLE PLA NTS AND FILL VO IDS. 7. WATER WITH IN TWO HOURS OF INSTALLATION. WA TER ING MU ST BE SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SATU RATE ROOT BALL AND PUN TING e. F1AC E M ULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SO IL MO ISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. NOTE: GU Y ASSEMBLY OPTIONAL BUT CON TRA CTOR A SSUM ES FULL R ESPONSIBILITY FOR M AINTAINING TREE IN A PLUMB PO SITION FOR TH E D URA TION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD GUY ASSEMBLY- 16' P OLYPRO PYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 M IL) 1-1/2' WIDE STRAP (TYP ) DOUBLE STRAND 10 GA. WIRE, 2.6' ROLLED STEEL POSTS (MnDDT 3401) B 160' 0 C (SEE STA KIN 5 DIAGRA M) COOROB4ATE STAKIN G TO IN SUR E • UNIFORM ORIENTA TION OF LINES AND AXES STAX NG DIAGRA M GUY WIRE WITH WEBBING FLAGGING- ONE PER WIRE 4'S- SHREDDED BARK M ULCH 2x2124' WOOD STAKE SET AT ANG LE - STAK E TO P BELOW GRA DE EXISTING GRADE M INIM UM 1F2 WID TH OF ROOT BALL PLANTING SOIL MIX TURE (SEE SPEC.) /UNDISTURBED 06 STABILIZED �/ SUBSOILS (9 CO NIFERO US TREE PLANTING DETAIL NO SCALE EXISTING GROUND C UT BACK SLO PE PR OVIDE A FIAT SURFACE FOR PLAN TING RUBB ER HOSE PLAN GE DOU BLE STR AND FLU OR ESC ENT O RANG E PAINTED fLVORESL FN TEOANGE WH ITE FLAG GING (TY,/ TREE WRA P N CHE5 MULCH NO TE SEE LANDSCA PE NO TES FOR THE TYPE O M ULCH M ATERIAL TO USE. OTREE PLANTING ON SLO PE NO SCALE CH DEEP SAUCER ST EEL TEE POST ] REQU IREDAT 120' BACKFRL MIX UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL R EM OVE FROM TOP A 1 OF THE BALL OLANDSCAPE BER M PLANTING DETAIL PLANTING NO TES 1. ALL PLANTS M UST BE HEALTHY. VIG OROUS M ATERIAL, FREE OF PESTS AN D DISEASE AND BE CO NTAIN ER GR OWN OR BALLED AND BURLAPP ED AS INDICA TED IN THE LANDSCAPE LEGEN D. 2. ALL TREES MUST BE STRA IGHT TRUNKED AND FULL HEADED AND MEET ALL REQUIREM EN TS SPECIFIED. 3. THE LA NDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES TH E R IGH T TO REJECT ANY PLANTS WH IC H AR E D EEMED UNSAT ISFA CTORY BEFORE. DURING. OR AFTER INSTALLA TION. 4. NO SUBSTITU TIONS O PLA NT MATERIAL SHA LL BE A CC EPTED UNLESS APPR OVED IN WRITING BY TH E LANDSCAPE A RCHITECT. 5. ALL PLANTING STO CK SHALL CONFORM TO THE 'AMERICAN STAN DAR D FOR NURSERY STOCK; ANSI -Z60, LATEST EDITION, OF TH E AMERICAN A SSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC. AN D SHA LL CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QU ALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIALS. 6. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REM AIN SHA LL BE PROTEC TED TO THE DRIP LINE FROM ALL CONSTRUC TION T RAFFIC, STO RAGE OF M ATERIALS ETC . WITH 4' HT. O RANGE PLA STIC SAFETY FENCING ADEQUA TELY SUPPO RTED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS 6 O .C. MAX IM UM SPA CING. 7. ALL PLANT M ATERIAL QUANTITIES, SHAPES OF BEDS AN D LO CATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CON TRACTO R SHALL BE RESPON SIBLE FO R COMPLETE COVERAG E Of ALL PLA NTING BEDS AT SPACING SHOWN AN0 ADJUSTED TO CO NFORM TO THE EX ACT COND ITIONS OF TH E SITE. 111E LANDSCAPE ARC HITECT SHALL AP PROVE ME STAKING LOCA TION OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS PRIOR TO N STALLAT ION. B. ALL TREES MUST BE PUN TED. MULCHED, AND STA KED AS SHO WN IN THE DETAILS. 9. ALL PLANTING AREA S MUST BE COMPLETELY MULCH ED AS SP ECIFIED, 10. MULCH: SHREDDED HARDWO OD MULCH , CLEA N AND FREE OF NOXIO US WEEDS OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL, IN ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS AND FOR TREES, UNLESS INDICA TED A5 RO CK M ULCH ON DR AWINGS. SUBMIT SAMPLE TO LAN DSCAP E ARCHITECT PRIOR TO DELIV ERY ON -SITE FO R APPROVAL. DELIVER M ULCH ON DAY OF INSTALLATION. USE 4- FO R TREES. SHRUB BEDS, AND 3' FOR PERENNIAUGROU ND C OVER BED S, UNLESS O THER WISE D IR ECTED. 11. THE PLAN TAXES PRECEDENCE O VER THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND IF DISCREP AN CIES EXIST. THE SP ECIFICATIO NS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLANTIN G NOTES AN D G EN ERAL NOTE S. 12. THE CON TRAC TOR SHA LL BE RESPO NSIBLE FOR A LL M ULCHES AND PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORK SH OWN ON THE PLAN . V ERIF Y ALL QUA NTITIES SHO WN ON THE LAND SCAPE LEGEND. 13. LONG-TERM STORAGE OF MATER IALS OR SUPP LIES ON -SITE WILL NOT BE A LLOWED. 14.111E CO NTRACTOR SHA LL KEEP PAVEMEN TS, PLANTERS AND BUILDINGS CLEAN AND U NSTA IN ED. ALL PEDESTR IAN AND V EHIC LE A CCESS TO BE M AW TONED THR OU GHOU T CO NSTRUCTION PERIO D. ALL WA STES SHALL BE PROM PTLY REMOVED FROM TH E SITE. ANY R ANT STOCK NOT PLAN TED ON DA Y OF DELIVERY SH ALL BE HEELED N AND WATERED UNTIL INSTALLATION. PLANTS NO T M AINTAIN ED IN THIS MAN NER WILL BE REJECTED- ANY DAMAGE TO EX ISTING FACILITIES SH ALL BE REPAV E° AT TH E CON700 570R' 5 EXPEN SE. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPON SIBLE FOR COM PLYING WITH ALL APP LICA BLE CODES. REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK . 16. LOCA TE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES, INC LUD IN G IRRIGATION LINES, WITH THE OWN ER FOR PROPRIETARY UTILITIES AND GOPHER STATE O NE CALL AT 454-0002 (TV/IN CITIES METRO AREA) OR 800-252-1166 (GR EA TER MIN NESOTA ) 48 HOURS BEFO RE DIGGING. CONTRA CTOR SHALL BE RESPO NSIBLE FOR THE PRO TECTION AND REPAIR OF ANY DAM AGES TO SAM E. NOTIFY TH E LA NDSCA PE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS TO FACILITATE PLAN T RELOCATION . 17. U SE *5710651054111(W11060 0F OR APPROVED EQ UAL)ON DECIDUOUS PLAN TS MOV ED IN LEAF AN D FOR EVER GREEN S MO VED ANYTIME. A PPLY AS PER MANUFA CTUR ER 'S IN STRU CTION. A LL EVERGREENS SHA LL BE SPRAYED N THE LATE FALL FOR WINTER PROTECTION WRING WAR RANTY PERIOD. 18. PLAN TING SOIL FO R TREES. SH RUBS AND GROUN D COVE RS: FERTILE FRIA BLE LOAM CONTAINING A LIBERAL AM OUNT O HUMUS A ND CAP ABLE OF SUSTAINING V IGOR OU S PLAN T GRO WTH . IT SHALL COMPLY WITH 1411/DOT SPECIFICATION 3877 TYPE B SELECT TOPSO IL. MIXTURE SH ALL BE FREE FR OM HAROPACK SUBSOIL. STONES, CHEMICALS, N OX IO US WEEDS, ETC, SOIL MIXTUR E SHAL L HA VE A PH BETWEEN 6.1 AND 7.5 NC 10-10-10 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF 3 POUNDS PER CUBIC YARD. N PLANTING BEDS INCO RP ORATE THIS MI%NRE THR OUGH OUT TH E ENTIR E BED BY ROTOTLLING INTO THE TOP 12 OF SO IL. 19. ALL PLANTS SH ALL BE GUARANTEED FOR TWO COMPLETE GROWING SEASON (APRIL 1 . 1OVEMBER 1). UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. THE GUAR AN TEE SHA LL CO VER THE FULL COST OF REPL ACEMENT NCLLAIN6 LABOR AND PLANTS. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NO TIFY THE L ANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LUST 3 DA YS PRIO R TO PLANNED DELIVERY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LA ND SCAPE ARCH ITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS N AD VA NCE OF B EGI NNI NG PLAN T INSTALLA TIO N. 21. SEASONS/TIME OF PLANTING: N OTE: THE C ONT RACTOR MAY ELECT TO PLANT IN O FF-SEASONS ENTIRELY AT HIS/HER RISK . DECIDUOUS POTTED PLANTS: APRIL 1 -JUNE 1: AUG . 21-NOV . 1 DECID UOUS BSI: APRIL (JUNE 1; AUG. 21 2400. 1 EVERGREEN POTTED PL ANTS: APRIL 1 JUNE 1; 606.260CT.1 EVERGREEN B80: APRIL 1 - MAY 15; A UG. 21-SEPT . 15 22. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMME DI ATEL Y AFTER E ACH PORTI ON 00 T HE WOR K IS N PUCE . PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED AND M AINTAI NED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF NYE PL ANTS IS CO MPLETE. INSPECTI ON HAS BEE N MA DE, AND PL ANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE. MAI NTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE W ATERING, CULTIVATING, MULCHING, RE MOVAL OF DEAD MATERIALS, R ESETTI NG PLANTS TO PROPER G RADE A ND KEEPING PLAN TS IN A PL UMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES . HOWEVER, THE C ONT RACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING THE TREES PLU MB T HQUG HOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 23 . ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHIC H DIES, TU RNS BROWN, OR DEF OLIATES (PRIOR TO T OTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK) SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FR OM THE SITE ANO REPUCEO WIT H MATERIAL OF T HE SAME SPECIE S Q UANTIT Y. AND SIZE AN D MEETING ALL LANDSCAPE LEGEND SPECIFICATIONS . 24. WATER ING: MANT AN A WATERING SC HEDULE W HICH WILL T HORO UG HLY W ATE R ALL PL ANTS ONCE A WEEK . IN EXTREMELY HOT , DRY WEATHER, WATER MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS OF HEAT STRESS SUCH AS WILTING LEAVES. CHECK MOISTURE U NDE R M UL CH PRI OR TO WATERING TO DETERMINE NEE D. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE NECESSARY ARR ANGEMENTS FOR WATER . 25. CONT RACT OR SH ALL RE QUEST IN WRITING, A FINAL ACCEPTANCE NSPECTKJN. 26. PLAN10455 TO UTILIZE PROP OSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 27. ALL D6N RBED A RE AS TO BE SEEDED , ARE TO RECEIVE 4' T OP SOIL, SEED. MULCH, 1140 W ATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED . N0 SCALE ENG INEERING SURVEYIN G ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC . 10250 Valley Vi ew R oad, S uit e 123 Eden Prairie, Minnesot a 55344 Ph one: 952-640-0236 Fax: 952-646-0290 www. eVS-eng.com ` 1 T Y O MEDINA City of M edi na, MN 2052 County Road 24 M edi na, Minnesota 55340 Phone: 763 473 -6643 Fax: 763473-9359 www. ei.medlna.mn .us PR OJ ECT LOC ATION SHEET PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE DETAIL # DATE R EVISION A 9/21/12 Pr eliminary Plat Plans 1 HE REBY C ERTIFY TH AT THIS PLAT, SPECIFI CA TION, OR R EPOR T W AS P REPARED BY ME OR UN DER MY DIRECT SUPERVISI ON AND THAT I M1 A DULY LI CENS ED LANDSC AP E ARCHITEC T UN DER TH E L AWS OF THE ST ATE OF MINNESO TA . Kathle en O'Connell DAT E 9/ 21/ 2012 REGISTRA TION NUM BER 20662 DRAWN BY CH ECKED BY KO D ATE KO P ROJ EC T # 03 .23 .2012 2011-001.1 SH EE T N UMB ER L102