Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout10-12-2010MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2010 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL (2052 County Road 24) 1. Call to Order 2. Public Comments on items not on the agenda 3. Update from City Council proceedings 4. Planning Department Report 5. Approval of September 14, 2010 Planning Commission minutes 6. Continued Public Hearing — Lennar — 3212 Hunter Drive (PIDs 12- 118-23-43-0002 & 13-118-12-0001) — Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Preliminary Plat (with right-of-way width variance) to subdivide 111 acre property into 115 single family lots and 41 townhomes to be known as "The Enclave of Medina." 7. Public Hearing - Helmuth Von Bluecher — 1425 Tamarack Drive ( PID #26-118-23-21-0003) - Preliminary Plat to subdivide one existing 42 acre parcel into three lots, to be known as "Fortuna Farms." 8. Public Hearing — Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning for three parcels at the northeast corner of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive as follows: to change the future land use of PID 02-118-23-34- 0002 to Medium Density Residential and the zoning designation to Rural Residential -Urban Reserve (RR-UR); to change the future land use of PID 02-118-23-34-0002 to Commercial and the zoning designation to Commercial Highway (CH); and to change the zoning designation of PID 02-118-23-33-0003 to Mixed Use (MU). 9. City Council Meeting Schedule 10. Adj ourn POSTED IN CITY HALL OCTOBER 7, 2010 G, T Y o c Comment Card MEDINA Name of Speaker: i \ rC (re - -ii ✓ Public Forum Agenda Item _,. 4; �� (please print) ,C. Address: .. f,0 u n t e l c/ Telephone (optional): Representing: �G'1 Agenda Item (list number and letter): Comments: Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes G x T V Comment Card MEDINA Name of Speaker: /dc..4t i r:01 t' Public Forum Agenda Item (ple se print) Address: 5", j' V ... •iw) J /1 dc.-•) . Telephone (optional): Representing: 5 L V. Agenda Item (list number and letter): i £ ^ A 4 i . Comments: Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes G, Ty F MEDINA Name of Speaker: Comment Card V- e )0c) I Public Forum Agenda Item V. ✓ Ue- Address: Z� �U ;callprint��) ccd k...13 avatA L Telephone (optional): Cr Representing: "C c ' 49- (6-4?' -ELA-(2-a'e-- r —J Agenda Item (list number Comments: and letter): ([� Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes G % T Y Comment Card MEDINA Name of Speaker: N r I L / F'4.• Public Forum Agenda Item (please print) Address: 3 6/6 Lin-\ C/Zte_-C OOH Telephone (optional): Representing: - / f - Agenda Item (list number and letter): I Z) 1 l p °— i Z ` 0-19 Comments: Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes G% T Y 0 A Card Comment MEDINA Name of Speaker: iez c,- ,/-6,.. /e Public Forum Agenda Item p� 7 lease riot) p J Address: /.5E� /h-7nn /t U Telephone (optional): Representing: /Ri.S, de), / Agenda Item (list number and letter): Comments: 4'SA Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes G% T Y O p Comment Card Public Forum Agenda Item MEDINA Name of Speaker: Cd ki / �� ( lea e rint `G Address: I`�7 %'f i Y. d ,..$i_ ). Telephone (optional): Representing: /.---,---,<1 G-`*-oc3-14,.Pi, Agenda Item (list number and letter): Comments: Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes G, T Y 0 A Comment Card MEDINA c. Name of Speaker: L.., 1 4.1 al �P �V--- Public Forum Agenda Item (please rint) (JC_ Address: 1 .7 O i 0._AA;'b c Ark Telephone (optional): ( Z - o o - Zt'• CP Representing: i Agenda Item (list number and letter): Comments: \ _ 0.---VV1 ktJ1.�.��� .1,. a_ -(I- (, cry 4-t ,1.-' &c - `i--6tA-t y Approach the podium to speak Meeting Rules of Conduct MEDINA • Please indicate if comment card is for the Public Forum or an Agenda Item in upper right hand corner. • Please fill out card and provide a brief summary of comments. • Please turn in the card to a staff member who will pass the card to the Mayor. The Mayor will call on you to speak when it is your turn. • Please approach the podium when called on to speak. While Speaking Please give name and address Please indicate if representing a group Please limit remarks to 3 to 5 minutes MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Crosby and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Adams DATE: September 30, 2010 SUBJ: Planning Department Updates for October 5, 2010 City Council Meeting Ordinance Updates A) Re -zonings — The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on August 11 and the City Council approved of the ordinances on September 7. Staff has begun the process of amending the Comp Plan with regards to the two parcels north of Highway 55 and east of Arrowhead as directed by the City Council. B) Driveway setback regulations — during the review of the Lennar project, staff has noted an inconsistency between the 5 -foot setback in the R-2 zoning district, and the requirement that driveways be setback 10 feet from property lines. The Planning Commission recommended that staff consider amendments to the driveway setback requirement. C) Procedures for Appealing Open Space data — The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at the September 14 meeting and recommended approval and the City Council adopted the ordinance at the September 21 meeting. It will be published this Friday and be in effect. Land Use Application Reviews A) Enclave of Medina Subdivision — 3212 Hunter Drive — Lennar has submitted for preliminary plat and Comp Plan Amendment for the Holasek property. A Public Hearing was held at the July 13 Planning Commission meeting, and the Commission raised a number of concerns with the plan. The Commission tabled the matter and urged the developer to update plans consistent with their comments. The applicant has submitted new plans which identifies 115 single family homes and 41 townhomes. The applicant is now requesting to shift the MUSA to the south to include an additional 3.17 acres of the existing tilled field and is maintaining 8.79 acres (4.93 net acres) of the wooded area within the MUSA as open space. The Public Hearing is scheduled to continue at the October 12 Planning Commission meeting. B) Hunter Ridge Farm Plat — 1382 Hunter Drive — Ron Carlson has requested subdivision of an existing 13.9 acres parcels into two lots. The request contests the Hennepin County Soils Survey in order to show adequate suitable soils for a subdivision. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on September 14 and recommended approval. Staff plans to present the request for City Council review at the October 5 meeting. C) Fortuna Farms Plat — 1425 Tamarack Drive — Helmuth von Bluecher has requested subdivision of an existing 44.2 acre parcel into three lots. The request contests the Hennepin County Soils Survey in order to show adequate suitable soils for a subdivision. Staff has begun review, and a Public Hearing is tentatively scheduled for the October 12 Planning Commission meeting. Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 October 5, 2010 City Council Meeting D) Hennepin County PUD Amendment — 1600 Prairie Drive — Hennepin County has requested Final PUD Plan approval to construct the 397 -foot wind turbine at its Public Works facility. Staff is reviewing submitted material and verifying that the conditions of the PUD approval are met. Staff will present the PUD agreement for Council to review at the October 5 meeting. E) Appeal of Administrative Decision — 2590 Keller Road — The City Council heard the property owner's and contractor's appeal of the denial of a permit to construct a pair of 4'x4' monuments within the City right-of-way adjacent to 2590 Keller at the January 5 meeting and adopted a resolution ordering the removal of the improvements on February 3. Staff provided an additional notice, and the monuments have not been removed. Staff will begin discussing options and prepare for a hearing for the Council to determine what action to take. F) Bradley Leawood 3rd Addn Plat — 3415 Leawood Drive — the City Council approved a resolution for preliminary plat on July 6. The City will await an application for Final Plat. G) Holy Name Cemetery — The City Council approved resolutions for the lot combination, CUP/Site Plan, Interim Use Permit and easement vacation over a year ago, but has not finalized all of the required conditions. The applicant is now considering requesting approval of some additional improvements on the site as well. H) Wrangler's Restaurant — 32 Hamel Road — the Council approved resolutions at the July 21 meeting. Staff has been in contact with the applicant regarding recording of the plat and requirements for submitting building permits. The City Council granted until March 10, 2011 for the applicant to final the plat. Additional Projects A) Zoning Enforcement (Hamel Station tree removal) — the City Council approved the agreement with the developer related to the remediation of the violations of the tree preservation ordinance and the shoreland overlay district. The applicant recently reported that plantings have been installed on the site and staff will schedule an inspection. B) Zoning Enforcement — Staff continues working with a number wetland violations and other work completed without permits. C) Municipal State Aid (MSA) mapping — Staff continues to work with Corcoran, Loretto, and MnDOT related to the map as approved by the City Council. Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 October 5, 2010 City Council Meeting 1 CITY OF MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION 2 Draft Meeting Minutes 3 Tuesday, September 14, 2010 4 5 6 1. Call to Order: Commissioner Charles Nolan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 7 8 Present: Planning Commissioners, Victoria Reid, Robin Reid, John Anderson, 9 Kathleen Martin, Kent Williams, Charles Nolan and Beth Nielsen. 10 11 Absent: none 12 13 Also Present: City Planner Dusty Finke and Planning Assistant Debra Peterson - 14 Dufresne 15 16 2. Public Comments on items not on the agenda 17 18 No public comments. 19 20 3. Update from City Council proceedings 21 22 Martin explained the Council discussion on the City taking over the cemetery; 23 Williams explained the discussion of the Cavanaugh property regarding its zoning 24 and uses for the property. Finke explained the Councils discussion of the City budget 25 and MSA funding. 26 27 4. Planning Department Report 28 29 Finke informed the Commission that the Enclave project may be at the October 30 Planning Commission meeting. He briefly explained other applications in the 31 process. 32 33 5. Approval of August 11, 2010 Planning Commission meeting minutes 34 35 Motion by Anderson, seconded by R. Reid to approve the August 11, 2010 minutes 36 with recommended changes. Motion carried unanimously. (Absent: None) 37 38 6. Public Hearing — Ronald & Kimberly Carlson —1382 Hunter Drive (PID #25- 39 118-23-13-0007) — Preliminary Plat to subdivide one existing parcel into two lots 40 to be known as Hunter Ridge Farm. 41 42 Finke presented the application describing the existing and proposed property layout 43 and the existing animal structures that do not meet setback requirements. He pointed 44 out conditions would be applied to the plat regarding the existing accessory 45 structures. 46 1 1 Anderson asked if the slope is the primary reason for the different soil categories. 2 Finke said yes the slope changes the classification. 3 4 Nolan said the property was surveyed and it's more of a geometry equation. Finke 5 said its all relative depending on where you're starting and ending. He said a 6 significant amount of staff time had been spent on the application and he is 7 comfortable with the final percentage of suitable soils. He also noted that the 8 applicant's surveyor also removed some of the soils from the list. 9 10 Williams pointed out that Loren Kohnen, the Building Official, made comment. 11 Finke stated staff didn't hire a separate party or hire the City engineer to verify soil 12 calculations. Williams asked if the City should have had the City engineer go out to 13 field verify. Finke said no, because he had reviewed the slopes and soil types 14 himself. Williams asked if Kohnens comments were obvious issues that staff could 15 review. Finke said yes. Nolan asked if it was common for an applicant to contest 16 suitable soils. Finke explained the process in how the applicant hires a surveyor and 17 staff verifies the information. Finke said the word is out that the data on suitable soils 18 within the City may not be 100% accurate, and could be challenged. 19 20 Nolan and the Commission requested suitable soils be discussed and reevaluated due 21 to the data the City is provided. The Commission requested flagging this issue as a 22 potential area for the Commission to review in the future. Finke said new data may 23 be provided in the future which would also help with floodplain data. 24 25 Finke explained the access and maintenance to both lots would be shared using the 26 existing driveway. He then explained the wetlands on -site and suggested the 27 Commission discuss frontage requirements. 28 29 Finke stated trees were not proposed to be removed or landscaping planted as part of 30 the plat. Easements were recommended around the perimeter of the lot, over 31 wetlands, floodplains, and upland buffers, which are standard. He also noted the Plat 32 application was going to the Park Commission on September 15, 2010 regarding Park 33 Dedication. 34 35 Finke reviewed the Criteria Requirements to subdivide a property. He pointed out the 36 potential changes to conditions within the staff report. He said the owner requested to 37 be able to move or remove the small shed either at time of sale of the property, time 38 of building permit issuance on the lot, and/or no later than three years. He also said 39 another possible condition would be related to grading and drainage onto adjoining 40 property to the north. He said the north property owner had an issue with existing 41 drainage and has concerns when the property develops. 42 43 Nielsen asked about the trail easement. She asked what happens if the trail moved 44 and the City didn't put it on the east side of the road. Finke said if the City decides to 45 put the trail on the west side of the street then the City would miss out on park 46 dedication based on how it is calculated within the staff report. 2 1 2 Anderson asked if anyone was interested in purchasing the property. Ron Carlson, 3 1382 Hunter Drive, applicant and owner stated he had someone interested in the 4 property, but nothing signed until City approval. 5 6 Nolan asked how long the applicant had to file the Plat. Finke explained. 7 8 Williams asked about the letter submitted with drainage concerns. Finke explained 9 the letter will be included in the minutes. 10 11 R. Reid raised concern with remembering the conditions of the Plat and how staff 12 tracks them. 13 14 Carlson said he appreciates all the work Finke has done. He thinks his is the last 15 property that has a parcel of this size. He feels it is more consistent with the lots in 16 the surrounding area. He does not see any legal issue with it. He said he went to 17 each of the neighbors to the north and gave them first offer to purchase the land prior 18 making an application and they chose to pass. 19 20 V. Reid asked how the applicant felt about the three year condition. Carlson said it 21 was a reasonable time frame, but is willing to listen to concerns related to that time 22 period. 23 24 Nielsen asked what would happen to existing animals. Carlson said their animal 25 numbers would have to be adjusted (reduced). 26 27 Nolan asked about the letter submitted by a neighbor and their concern with 28 shadowing. Carlson said the future house would have to be a very tall home to have 29 shadowing issues. He further explained the existing drainage patterns and that they 30 have been in existence since the owners to the north purchased. R. Reid asked about 31 protecting site lines. Carlson said the property owners to the north were given the 32 opportunity to purchase the site lines. 33 34 Finke explained drainage would be handled when issuing the building permit. He 35 said landscaping would not be a condition of the plat. Carlson explained a swale 36 currently exists. Finke explained most of Lot 1 is down slope. 37 38 R. Reid said not much hard cover would be added. Finke concurred. 39 40 Anderson asked for clarification of what Carlson meant by the neighbor to the north 41 purchasing his site line. Carlson explained he gave the northern property owner an 42 opportunity to purchase. 43 44 Public Hearing was opened at 7:50 p.m. 45 46 Public Hearing closed at 7:51 p.m. 3 1 2 Nolan explained he was on the Commission when flag lots were established and the 3 issue was really minimum lot width for RR zoning districts. He felt the issue of lot 4 width was never really dealt with during that process. In other words, the proposed 5 application should be looked at with current regulations. Nolan asked if a lot should 6 be created without frontage. He said his strong opinion was that each lot should have 7 road frontage. Nielsen asked Nolan why. Nolan said an easement can be contested 8 and in his experience all communities have a minimum frontage. 9 10 Finke said he thinks all lots should have their entire frontage on a public street. Finke 11 said the City has been inconsistent in their regulations. He said since 2001 the City 12 has not approved a lot without frontage. 13 14 R. Reid said a long discussion was done by the Commission defining a flag lot. The 15 Commission didn't determine how wide a flag lot had to be. 16 17 Finke said the existing property doesn't have enough frontage to create a 50 foot wide 18 flag since the existing parcel is only 325 feet wide. 19 20 Finke said he doesn't think it's possible to have a 25 foot driveway easement (an 21 unusable flag pole). Nolan said it would create a frontage for the lot, even though it 22 may not be usable. Nielsen asked why a frontage was necessary. Finke said the 23 primary reason is ownership and emergency access. Nolan said they only have half 24 an answer. He felt to avoid future conflict, having a legal access off the road was 25 necessary. He said an easement could be the actual paved right-of-way. 26 27 R. Reid asked if staff was recommending a shared driveway with easement rights 28 over Lot 1 for benefit of Lot 2. Finke said an alternative would be to create a 25 foot 29 flag lot to meet minimum lot size requirements, with adjustments of the property line. 30 He said the use of the frontage would be questionable. R. Reid asked what was 31 proposed was not a flag lot and Finke confirmed. 32 33 Anderson asked how the properties to the north are handled. Finke said shared 34 driveways. 35 36 Nolan asked from a policy viewpoint what is better for the City. Finke said requiring 37 a minimum flag pole width would be best. 38 39 Carlson said they have a well that may be impacted by changing property lines 40 running north/south. 41 42 Nielsen said she does not have any issues with the proposed subdivision design. 43 Williams said if it's not practical to utilize the flag pole perhaps it shouldn't be 44 required. 45 4 1 V. Reid said the person at risk for not having direct frontage on Hunter Drive is the 2 person proposing the application. 3 4 Nolan asked if the City had street frontage requirements. Finke said yes. Nolan said 5 he doesn't have an issue with the proposed subdivision, but he is a stickler for 6 following public policy. He said why not require the subdivision to have frontage 7 and an easement, even though they don't use it. Finke said that is what is suggested 8 as an alternative without moving the driveway. 9 10 Carlson said he agrees and understands with Nolan's concerns. He asked if there is a 11 minimum size for the flag access. Nolan said they should look at the width necessary 12 for emergency access and required setbacks for driveways. 13 14 Carlson asked if frontage on a lake qualifies as frontage for Lot 2. Williams said it's 15 more practical than the flag lot access. Williams said with only 25 feet the driveway 16 could only be five feet wide, since 10 feet is required for setbacks. 17 18 Finke explained the rights of the Commission to hold up on the application in order to 19 work on resolving the access issue. 20 21 Williams suggested the Commission mark the issue of establishing flag lot width 22 requirement to be resolved by the Council. 23 24 Finke explained a 300 foot lot width requirement within the RR district and a 150 25 foot setback requirement for animal structures could result in a possibility that lots 26 can be created that wouldn't allow an animal structure. 27 28 Commissioners discussed adding flexibility to when the shed removal should occur. 29 30 Commissioners discussed adding a condition related to grading of Lot 1. 31 32 Williams had an issue with how the Park Dedication was being interpreted. He said 33 his interpretation of the Statute is that the City could take the 15 feet for trail and then 34 also take the 8% ($8,000.00) cash. 35 36 The consensus on Park Dedication was to follow staff's recommendation, but 37 discussed Williams's concern. 38 39 Finke said the City is working on a policy for park dedication. Williams wants his 40 interpretation of how to calculate park dedication on the record. 41 42 Nolan asked the applicant to review the existing well location. 43 44 Nolan said he likes to stay as close to policy as one can, even if it means the lot has 45 frontage that is unlikely to be used. Nolan therefore recommended a 25 foot 46 minimum road frontage for Lot 2. 5 1 2 V. Reid asked if it is required that the lot have frontage along the entire front of the 3 lot. Nolan said the enactment of the flag lot effectively repeals that entire frontage 4 law and agrees with Finke's interpretation. 5 6 Motion by Nolan, seconded by Williams to recommend approval of the subdivision 7 subject to conditions in staff report, with the following modifications: 8 9 1. Lot 2 shall be required to have frontage on a public road of 25 feet and a 10 reciprocal easement be granted. 11 2. Additional flexibility for removal of shed on Lot 2. 12 3. Add a condition related to the review of drainage on Lot 1 at time of grading 13 permit. 14 15 Motion by Williams, seconded by Anderson to amend the park dedication 16 requirements to trail easement and $8000. Ayes, Nielsen, Anderson and Williams. 17 Motion to amend Failed. (Recused: Martin) 18 19 Motion by R. Reid, seconded by V. Reid to amend original motion to remove 25 foot 20 flag requirement. Ayes by Nielsen, R. Reid, and V. Reid. Motion to amend failed. 21 (Recused: Martin) 22 23 Commission voted on original motion: Ayes: Williams, Nolan, and Anderson. 24 Motion Failed. (Recused: Martin) 25 26 Motion by V. Reid, seconded by R. Reid to recommend approval of the Preliminary 27 Plat subject to conditions in staff report, with the following modifications: 28 29 1. Additional flexibility for removal of shed on Lot 2. 30 2. Add a condition related to the review of drainage on Lot 1 at time of grading 31 permit. 32 33 Motion carried unanimously. (Recused: Martin) 34 35 The Planning Commission requested the Council provide direction on the following 36 concerns within the zoning ordinance: 37 38 • Lot frontage in the Rural Residential zoning district 39 • Establishing a minimum flag lot width along a street 40 • Interpretation of how to calculate park dedication 41 • Creating a policy for suitable soil discrepancies 42 43 44 45 6 1 7. Public Hearing — Ordinance Amendment — Section 827 of the City Code with 2 regards to the process of appealing information within the City's Open Space 3 Report related to development in the Conservation Design district. 4 5 Finke explained why the zoning district was created and the objectives of the 6 conservation design ordinance. He referenced the City's open space report and the 7 regulations within the conservation design ordinance, which allows a developer to 8 meet certain open space guidelines to allow for additional density. The open space 9 ordinance is designed to protect existing open space. He further explained that if a 10 developer or applicant disagreed with staff on what is considered significant, the 11 attached process is proposed to allow for an appeal to staffs decision. 12 13 R. Reid asked what year the MLCCS inventory was done. Finke said 2005 and 2007. 14 She further asked if it was fair to say the science had improved since 2005 and 2007. 15 Finke said Bonestroo, the City's engineering firm, said there are shades of gray in the 16 MLCCS and interpretations are in the process of being clarified. 17 18 Nolan asked the Commissioners if they had any issue or concerns. 19 20 Williams suggested the language should be changed in the first sentence to read 21 "conservation design applicant." 22 Finke explained that from a policy standpoint the review gives staff administrative 23 authority, yet the proposed additions to the ordinance will allow an applicant to 24 appeal a decision. 25 26 Public Hearing opened at 8:55 p.m. 27 28 Public Hearing closed at 8:56 p.m. 29 30 Motion by R. Reid, seconded by Martin to approve the Ordinance Amendment with 31 the addition of language suggested by Williams. Motion carried unanimously. 32 (Absent: None) 33 34 8. City Council Meeting Schedule 35 36 9. Adiourn 37 38 Motion by Anderson, Seconded by Nielsen to adjourn the meeting at 9:03 p.m. 7 c AGENDA ITEM 7 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dale Cooney, Management Intern; through Dusty Finke, City Planner DATE: October 8, 2010 MEETING: October 12, 2010 Planning Commission SUBJ: Helmuth Von Bluecher —1425 Tamarack Drive (PID 26-118-23-21-0003) — Preliminary Plat to subdivide 46.33 acre parcel into three lots — Public Hearing Review Deadline Original Application Received: July 8, 2010 Complete Application Received: August 9, 2010 120 -day Review Deadline: December 8, 2010 Overview of Request Helmuth Von Bluecher proposes to subdivide his existing 46.33 acre property at 1425 Tamarack Drive into three lots. Please see the location map below. The preliminary plat, called "Fortuna Farms" is attached for review. As part of the request, the applicant is contesting the Hennepin County soils data and claiming additional area should be considered "suitable soils." Property Description The subject property is located on the southwest corner of Tamarack Drive and Deerhill Road. An aerial photograph of the site is located on the back of this page. The lot is primarily pasture land with some wooded areas surrounding the existing home site. A stream is located in the northwest corner of the lot, running diagonally to the southwest. Besides the existing home, the property contains six additional structures. The largest structure, a 16,000 foot horse barn, is on a proposed lot line and will need to be removed as a condition of this subdivision. Other existing structures on the property include four animal structures and a lean-to. Helmuth Von Bluecher Page 1 of 7 Fortuna Farms Preliminary Plat Planning Commission Meeting October 12, 2010 fr The property is currently zoned Rural Residential (RR), and guided Rural Residential in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The property is surrounded on all sides by other RR land uses. Preliminary Plat The applicant proposes to subdivide the existing 46.33 acre parcel into three lots. Lot 1 is proposed to be 14.54 acres in size. Lot 2 is proposed to be 12.21 acres total. Lot 3 is proposed to be 17.43 acres total. Remaining acreage is dedicated as right-of-way along Tamarack Drive and Deerhill Road. Final parcel size after right-of-way dedication is 44.18 acres. Lot 1 has proposed driveway access onto Deerhill Road. Lots 2 and 3 have proposed driveway access onto Tamarack Drive. The preliminary plat is attached, and the photo on this page is an aerial photograph which shows the approximate location of the proposed dividing lines. Helmuth Von Bluecher Fortuna Farms Preliminary Plat Page 2 of 7 October 12, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting l Lot Standards The proposed characteristics of the proposed lots are summarized in the table below, compared with the requirements of the RR zoning district. Rural Residential Requirements Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot Size (gross) None 14.54 acres 12.21 acres 17.43 acres Lot Size (suitable soils) 5 -acre contiguous suitable soils 5.05 acres 5.12 acres 5.38 acres Minimum Lot Width 300 feet 705 ft. 588 ft. 1285 ft. Minimum Lot Depth 200 feet 890 ft. 895 ft. 580 ft. Setbacks Front 50 feet 405' (Pos House Site) 350' (Pos House Site) 625' (Existing House Site) Side 50 feet 80' / 520' 455' / 340' 65' / 480' Rear 50 feet 435' 185' 615' Animal Structures 150 feet 705' / 65' 125' / 605' N/A 585' / 265' 445' / 205' Shoreland Overlay 75 feet 535 ft. N/A N/A Maximum Hardcover 40% (25% in shoreland overlay) .5% 2.8% 3.8% Grazable Acres (Maximum animal units) 1 unit/first 2 acres + 1 unit/acre 11 acres (10 animal units) 10.9 (9.9 animal units) 12.2 acres (11.2 animal units) As proposed, all three lots meet the dimensional standards of the RR district. There is a small lean-to structure on Lot 1 that does not meet minimum setbacks required for the RR district. This structure will need to be moved or taken down. The existing animal structure on proposed Lot 1 does not meet the 150 foot setback required in the RR district, so it will not be able to be used to house animals in the future. Staff recommends conditions to this effect. The applicant has provided designs for two septic sites on each lot which were reviewed by the building official. All lots can support a primary and secondary site. Suitable Soils As mentioned above, the applicant is contesting the Hennepin County soils information on this property. An attached preliminary plat delineates the areas of suitable soils with yellow highlighting. Soils being contested are shown with a crosshatch. The applicant is seeking to reclassify a large portion of the soils in the front pasture from "L22D2" soils (non -suitable) to "L22C2" soils, which are considered suitable. L22D2 and L22C2 soils share most of their characteristics, and the only difference between the two is the topography on which they are located. L22C2 soils are less than 12% while L22D2 soils are 12% or greater. The applicant has submitted topographical information in order to demonstrate that much of this area is less than 12% in slope. A fair amount of the area is significantly under 12%, while some Helmuth Von Bluecher Page 3 of 7 October 12, 2010 Fortuna Farms Preliminary Plat Planning Commission Meeting areas appear to be 10-12%. Staff consulted with the building official/septic inspector who agreed that if soils identified as L22D2 are indeed less than 12%, they should be considered suitable. It should also be noted that the applicant has excluded some areas which the City's soil information classified as suitable because when they surveyed the topography, these areas were greater than 12% in slope. So, in addition to seeking to add some soils as suitable, the applicant is also subtracting a smaller area. Streets/Access Currently, a dedicated right-of-way does not exist along either Deerhill Road or Tamarack Drive. As part of this subdivision, the applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way to the city. As proposed, Lot 1 would require new driveway access off of Deerhill Road and Lot 2 would require new driveway access off of Tamarack Drive. Lot 3 would use existing driveway access off of Tamarack Drive. Lot 1 is located within a shoreland overlay district and has a proposed driveway near a protected stream. Medina City Code 827.07, Sub. 3a does not allow roads within 50 feet of a shore impact zone. Future build out of this lot should be reviewed for compliance. Staff recommends this as a condition of approval. Staff does not believe the creation of additional lots requires any type of street improvements. Wetlands/Floodplains The property owner has submitted a wetland delineation for review and staff has completed a preliminary review. The property includes six wetlands, and upland buffers will be required adjacent to these wetlands. In five of the six wetlands, it appears that pasture and turf grass will need to be removed and a more suitable buffer established. The remaining wetland, 26-046, contains both pasture and a wooded buffer. In addition to providing a more suitable buffer along the pasture area, buckthorn remediation will need to be provided in the wooded areas. For the purposes of suitable soils, applicant has used Minnehaha Creek Watershed District floodplain information. Floodplain maps identify a Zone A (1% annual chance) floodplain along the northern third of the property, with the largest floodplain areas concentrated near the wetland areas on the northwest and northeast sides of the property. Conditional Use Permits The existing property was granted a conditional use permit for horse boarding, breeding and training (City of Medina Resolution No. 87.74). The subdivision process will revoke the exiting CUP rendering the horse boarding, breeding and training facilities non -conforming. Under city code, up to two accessory structures are permitted on lots larger than three acres (Medina City Code 825.19, Subd.3). Lot 3 will contain three accessory structures following the subdivision. Staff recommends approval of a CUP for the existing accessory structures be granted as part of this approval. Helmuth Von Bluecher Page 4 of 7 October 12, 2010 Fortuna Farms Preliminary Plat Planning Commission Meeting Stormwater and LID Review The City Engineer does not recommend requiring stormwater improvements as a condition of this subdivision. Drainage will be reviewed when a building permit is requested for Lots 1 and 2 in order to mitigate any potential impact of additional run-off on adjacent properties. No LID practices are proposed, however due to the large lot sizes proposed lots will contain minimal hardcover. Tree Preservation/Landscaping There is limited tree cover on the exiting property, most of which will be located on Lots 1 and 3 upon subdivision. Lot 2 is primarily open pasture, so tree removal should be limited when this site develops. Future construction will be subject to the City's tree preservation ordinance. Due to the limited number of trees along the north of the property, views of adjacent properties across Deerhill Road are unobstructed. The applicant is not proposing landscaping as part of the subdivision. The RR zoning district does not include specific landscaping requirements, and this division does not trigger a bufferyard. Staff believes it is very likely that future property owners building on Lot 1 and Lot 2 will wish to install additional landscaping, the location of which is dependent on where the future home is located. As a result, staff is not recommending additional landscaping as a condition of approving this subdivision. As mentioned above, buffers will need to be planted and maintained adjacent to wetlands on the property. Easements The plat states that standard perimeter easements will be granted on the final plat around each lot. Additionally, drainage and utility easements will be required over all wetlands and floodplains. Staff has recommended a condition that easements be provided over all upland buffers around wetlands as well, but these will not be identified on the plat. Park Dedication The City's park dedication ordinance allows the City to require "up to 10% of the buildable land" to be dedicated for parks and trails. As an option, the City may accept a cash fee in -lieu of dedicated property. Of the 44.18 acres, staff estimates 36.76 acres are buildable, which would mean the City could require a maximum of 3.6 acres of buildable property to be dedicated. If the City wished to collect only cash, the maximum fee would be $16,000 (generally, this amount is 8% of the market value, but $8,000 is the maximum fee per new dwelling unit in the fee schedule). The City could also choose a combination of land and cash. The Trail plan identifies a future moderate -low priority trail along Tamarack Drive and low priority trail along Deerhill Road. The trail plan does not specify which side of the street these trails should be on. The Park Commission will review the application to determine if trail easements should be required, of if cash should be required in -lieu in the amount of $16,000. Helmuth Von Bluecher Page 5 of 7 October 12, 2010 Fortuna Farms Preliminary Plat Planning Commission Meeting Review Criteria/Findin2s of Fact Subd. 10 of Section 820.21 of the City Code describes the criteria for reviewing a subdivision and states that the City "shall deny approval of a preliminary or final plat based on one or a combination of the following findings (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way." With the conditions recommended below, staff does not believe the proposed subdivision meets any of the findings above for denial. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: (1) No construction or grading is proposed or approved at this time. Future construction shall be reviewed for compliance with relevant regulations of the City Code prior to issuance of any building permits. (2) Applicant shall remove existing 16,000 sq/ft. animal structure. (3) Future construction on Lot 1 shall be reviewed for compliance with shoreland overlay district regulations. (4) The existing lean-to within Lot 1 minimum setback requirements of 50 feet shall be moved or demolished. (5) The existing animal structure within Lot 1 minimum setback requirements of 150 feet shall be moved, demolished, or converted to a non -animal use. (6) The subdivision shall be subject to park dedication requirements as determined by the City Council (7) Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way along Tamarack Drive and Deerhill Road. (8) The applicant shall dedicate easements as recommended by the City Engineer along the perimeter of the lot and over all wetland and floodplain locations. Helmuth Von Bluecher Page 6 of 7 October 12, 2010 Fortuna Farms Preliminary Plat Planning Commission Meeting (9) The existing Conditional Use Permit, granted by Resolution 87-74 shall be revoked, and non -conforming uses and structures shall be eliminated. (10) Future construction shall be subject to City tree preservation regulations. (11) The applicant shall meet the requirements of the City Attorney with regards to title issues and platting procedures. (12) The applicant shall meet the recommendations of the City Engineer letter dated August 16. (13) The applicant shall provide easements over Upland Buffers as required Section 828.43 of the City Code. These easements shall be a separate instrument and shall not be shown on the plat. (14) The applicant shall install vegetation and signage within the Upland Buffers as required by Section 828.43 of the City Code. (15) The final plat shall abide by the requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. (16) The application for final plat must be submitted to the City within 180 days of preliminary plat approval or the preliminary plat shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council. (17) The applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat and other relevant documents. Attachments 1. City Engineer comments dated August 16, 2010 2. Preliminary plat with highlighted suitable soils. 3. Preliminary Plat as received by the City on October 8, 2010 Helmuth Von Bluecher Page 7 of 7 October 12, 2010 Fortuna Farms Preliminary Plat Planning Commission Meeting clep 2335 Highway 36 W 5t. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 • Fax 651-636-1311 August 16, 2010 Ms. Debra Peterson -Dufresne Planning Assistant City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: L-10-058 Fortuna Farms Preliminary Plat (1425 Tamarack Drive) City of Medina Bonestroo File No.: 000190-10000-1 Dear Deb, We have reviewed the revised preliminary plat dated 8-6-10 for the proposed subdivision at 1425 Tamarack Drive. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters. • The applicant has noted that the Final Plat will show all lot line dralnage.and utility easements as requested. • The driveway for the proposed Lot 2 should be located off Tamarack Drive. This would eliminate any floodplain or wetland impacts. • The driveway for the proposed Lot 1 should use the existing field road alignment eliminating any wetland or floodplain impacts. • Lot 3 should use the existing driveway as shown on the plans for any future home. • The Final Plat should dedicate 33' of right-of-way along Tamarack Drive and Deer Hill Road. • Please see wetland ordinance comments from John Smyth submitted under separate cover. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (651) 604-4894. Sincerely, BONESTROO Darren Amundsen Cc: Tom Kellogg Dusty Finke 1 www.boneshno.com Bonestroo • Memorandum To: Debra Peterson - Dufresne Project: 1425 Tamarack Drive (Fortuna Farms) Date: 8/16/2010 From: John Smyth Client: City or Medina Re: Wetland Conservation Code (828.43) Compliance Review ` Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 File No: 139-10000 www.bonestroo.com Remarks: The project involves subdividing the property into three lots which triggers the requirements of the City Wetland Conservation Code 828.43 (Wetland Code). There are six wetland basins located within the property. The table below summarizes the wetland ID, classification, buffer width and setback from the buffer for the wetlands within the property. Wetland ID (Delineation Report) Wetland ID (City Classification Map) Classification Buffer Width Setback from Buffer Edge 1 26-047 Preserve 35 15 1A 26-011 Manage 1 30 15 Ditch A 26-046 Preserve 35 15 2 26-049 Manage 1 30 15 3 26-010 Manage 2 25 15 4 26-003 Preserve 35 15 Future submittals should show: 1. Wetland ID 2. Wetland classification 3. Line represent upslope edge of buffer 4. Line representing setback from buffer Upland Buffer Vegetative Performance Standard A site visit was conducted on 8-16-10. All the wetlands except for 26-046 have buffers that are predominately open fields that contain plant species common to pastures such as canada goldenrod, thistle, smooth brome, yellow foxtail, kentucky bluegrass, rye grass, stinging nettle, red top, common milkweed and reed canary grass. Wetland 26-046 contains open fields similar to the other wetlands as well as a wooded buffer. The wooded buffer of this wetland has walnut trees along with buckthorn and other woodland species. Reed canary grass, thistle and buckthorn are considered weed species that will require removal and control within the buffer. The applicant will need to provide a Management/Landscaping plan that includes the following: 1. Method proposed to control weed species (MN DNR website source for options). All buckthorn removal should be done using hand tools as large equipment can further disrupt the wetland buffer. At a minimum buckthorn should be cut and the remaining stems should be treated with an approved herbicide following label instructions. Treating the cut stumps will help prevent regrowth of the buckthorn. 2. In areas of invasive species native vegetation should be seeded. According to the ordinance Subd. 8. the seed mix must contain at least 15 pounds (PLS) per acre with a minimum of at least four species of native grasses and five species of native forbs. A source of potential seed mixes are provided in the MN BWSR Web Site — Publication: "Restoring & Managing Native Wetland and Upland Vegetation". 3. A schedule of activities that are part of the management and maintenance for the removal of buckthorn and the establishment of vegetation in the buffer shall be provided. Survey Requirements A legal description for the upslope edge of the buffer will need to be submitted as part of the conservation easement (see below). Conservation Easement Upland buffer zones shall be protected by a conservation easement granted to the city by the applicant in a form provided by the city. Wetland Buffer Markers The applicant must place markers at the upland boundary of the wetland buffer edge at least every two hundred fifty feet, subject to City approval. The applicant will need to show the location of the signage for City approval on the site or grading plan. Financial Guarantee It is recommended that the City require a financial guarantee for the vegetative corrective work within the buffer on this project. If available from the applicant the City would like a cost estimate for the buffer landscaping work. This will help determine an appropriate Financial Guarantee. Page 2of2 .3 44 Acres Part of the NE Y. of the NW of Section 26 T116N R23W angitria sample CAP WO Approximate Wetland Boundary Map Overlaid on 2004 Aerial Photography 0 730 Feet Data Protected In North American Datum of 1913.1 Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 15 N Boundary Source Hennepin County Parcel Database MOW, mnale Panel t3oundary / pen nr, a1( Welland Boundary * Sample Porn) 1425 Tamarack Drive Medina MN Figure 5 0 . Y•i1• 1 OF 1-116-z3 1 HELMUTH VON BLUECHER IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 26-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ---S 89°56' 07" E BLACKTOP ROADWAYN Ok ♦ i NONE �"; �:t1�� c_,,,,,,_, P f POSED• •\`� \ , -3 DI G /� ��:(w'" ' i;INES �• � ; � 'N`�. .� 1 706+- `� Q 1� 0 0 ITT 0 �I • • /r%% //Hi / / r — —S 89°53' 04" W J 01 1 o 1 1!\ 111t m1 • , ` \1 ▪ -' L5OA DENOTES SOL ORICNALLY DESIGNATED AS ACCEPTABLE: CHANGED TO NOT ACCEPTABLE BY TOPOGRAPHY DENOTES SOL ORIGNALLY DESIGNATED AS NOT ACCEPTABLE; CHANGED TO ACCEPTABLE BY TOPOGRAPHY // (1325) GAS TEN L L`C • NORTH L6! OF NR 1/4 CF C•26-116-23 USE 023M4 1 14 2 1,0„ • r L50A \ NONE / I ' 3.79 :ACRES 1 ` ,' s soPTC 1 \ SITE a �. - • , N LK OF 1334.70-----••• -_966_. 1330.70---" • 1 33I 33 I1 I -�1►I II I ,E CORR OF K•J�• -NW 1/. CF VVVVV4 SEC. 26-116-23 11TH EAST LIE ' - OF i v 1/1 Of SL C. 36-116-23 BLACKTOP ROADWAY 1 fi-LL11' KITS 66 FORT UNA FARMS • OCT - 8 2010 FLOODPLAIN : LINE N 0 PRELIMI NARY PLAT AND CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR HELM UT H VON BLUECHER IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 26-118-23 HENNEPIN CO UNTY, MINNESOTA --S 89 °56' 07" E MCWD FLOOD. /WETLA ND; BU FFER-• 1 `` I SETBACK �1 T IS HA, r LUVU YL HIV VL.n iiVir r air , .. .. .. •• ••, - -. . - /'�' NOTE: THE NW CORNER OF THE PROPERTY ISLOCATEDW ITHIN THE SHOREL AND OVERLAY DISTRICT 0 denotes iron marker (908.3) : deno tes ex isting spot elevation, mean sea le ve l datum 917- — -: denote s ex isting contour line, mean sea leve l datu m, pe r our Oc tober 2006 field work Bearin gs shown ore based u pon on assumed datum. Soils type informatio n is taken from the Hen nepin Co unty website, an d on ly adju sted based upo n existin g topography. Total a rea = 46.33 acres Area without right —of —way = 44.18+ — acres This survey in tends to sho ws the bo undaries of the abov e desc ribed pro perty. the loca tion of nine existin g buildings, to pogra phy, spot elevations, soil type s, wooded area s, an d the proposed loca tion of two div iding lines the reon. It do es no t purport to show any other improv emen ts or encro achmen ts. IM PERVIO US SURFACE CALCULATIONS : (HARDCOVER) Ex isting lot oreo (minu s we tla nds a nd roo ds) = 1,924,481_ Sq. ft. Existing buildings (minus those to be re move d) = 10,559_st Existing drivewoys = 13,000 '_ sf 23,559 / 1. 924,481 X 100 = 1.227. BLACKTOP ROAD WAY: ., Tll»— /" � �IA MAP' ao U /oar_.l 11 0 u� • ti, • AND THE FLOODWAY CONT OURS AS SHOWN ON THE EAST PART. NORTH LINE OF NW 1/4 OF ;SE C. 26-118-23 133 1334.70----------._• I 000 33 NE CO R OF -N W 1/4 OF SEC. 26-118-23 • • • • • • N O 0 UI co (J1 v-(9612) 1016150.SFEx6ED1.SCJ REVISIONS DESIGNED IHEREB Y CERTIFY TT(ATTHISPLAN .SPECIFICATIONORREPORT WAS PREPA ED BY ME OR (ALDER MY DIRECT SU PERVISION. 7-7-16DATE DATE &ASS OCIATES, INC . CIVIL ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNERS BY REMARKS 10• 8-6-10 REVISIONS D6 uD. 10-167 )GR0NBE 445 N. WILL OW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN 55356 PHONE: 952-473-4141 FAX: 952-473-4435 8-25-10 REVISIONS 10-7-10 REVISIONS CHECKED DATE i�Z�f f � EDswus AGENDA ITEM: 6 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231 .2555 Facsimile: 763.231 .2561 planners@nacplanning.corn PLANNING REPORT TO: Medina Mayor and City Council Medina Planning Commission FROM: Nate Sparks / Steve Grittman DATE: October 6, 2010 RE: Medina — LENNAR/Enclave; Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Preliminary Plat (Continued) NAC FILE: 306.02 — 10.03 CITY FILE: L-10-055 Review Deadline: January 23, 2011 (extended by applicant) BACKGROUND The Planning Commission tabled a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Preliminary Plat with variance application at the August meeting for a project proposed by LENNAR to be known as the Enclave. In order to address the issues related to the item being tabled, the applicant has responded with the attached revised documents and plans. The previous submittal had planned for 134 single family dwelling units and 41 townhome units on a 109 acre site located east of Hunter Drive, north of Medina Road and south of Hamel Road and Uptown Hamel. The revised plan consists of 115 single family residential parcels and 41 townhome units. The property currently consists of farmland with one homestead located in the northern half of the site. To complete the processing of this request, LENNAR has requested approval of the following applications: a comprehensive plan amendment, a rezoning of the subject site, a preliminary plat and a variance for reduced right-of-way (ROW) width. The first decision to be made is the proposed comprehensive plan amendment. A decision on the comprehensive plan amendment is a policy decision, and the City has a great deal of discretion when requested. As with the previous review, if the Planning Commission and City Council do not feel that the comprehensive plan amendment is in line with the City's land use goals and policies, then the other applications must be denied as well since they are directly dependent upon the approval of the comprehensive plan amendment. The report is divided into three sub -sections, the first outlining policy decisions related to consistency with the comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance, followed by a review of compliance with the three proposed residential zoning districts and the City's general preliminary plat requirements. The review outlines the planning and zoning issues related to the request and summarizes key issues that the Planning Commission and City Council should discuss prior to making a decision on the submitted applications. Exhibits: 1. City Engineer's Report(s) 2. EAW 3. Revised Sketch Depicting R-1 Lots 4. Revised Sketch Depicting Elm Creek Drive Access & Cul-de-sac 5. Revised Sketch Depicting Appropriate Comprehensive Plan Designations 6. Applicant's Plan Set 7. Applicant's Narrative ANALYSIS SECTION 1- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING Concept Plan Review. A concept plan for The Enclave was reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council earlier this spring. The concept plan proposed 195 single family lots. During the concept plan review process, the Planning Commission, City Council and general public offered comments regarding proposed densities, site design and other general comments. The majority of the comments made by City staff, officials and the general public encouraged the developer to propose a subdivision that closely mirrored the future land use guiding set forth by the Comprehensive Plan. There were several comments made in opposition to extension of the MUSA line. It was noted that during the comprehensive plan update process, there were many discussions on the future land use guiding of this property and it was decided that the density should be phased from medium residential densities in the northern portion of the site to rural residential densities in the south. Several of the City officials indicated that higher density housing and a greater variety of housing types would be preferable. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning. The subject site is guided for medium density residential (3.5 to 6.99 units/acre), low density residential (2.0 to 3.49 units/acre) and rural residential uses in a graduated fashion from the north to the south. The northern portion of the site guided for medium density residential uses contains 23.21 net acres and would support a residential development of 81 to 162 units. The middle portion of the site, guided for low density residential uses, contains 27.8 net acres and could be developed with a low density residential development containing 56 to 97 units. The southern portion of the site contains 41.16 acres and is guided for rural residential uses. Areas designated as rural residential are not planned to be serviced with municipal 2 utilities and are to develop at a density of no more than one unit per five acres of contiguous soils suitable for a septic system. Overall, the subject site contains 51.01 net acres within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and would be allowed to develop within the range of 137 units to 259 units to be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has proposed 41 townhome units, 101 R-2 single family lots and 14 R-1 single family lots. The proposal is to add 3.17 acres of the rural residential designation to the MUSA. In exchange, the developer is proposing to remove an equivalent amount of land from the MUSA. This area is proposed for preservation of a high quality woodland area that would serve the City's tree preservation goals. The area removed from the MUSA will be guided as Park & Recreation, as it is intended to be a conservation area to preserve trees with trail access. The northern portion of the plat is guided for Medium Density Residential uses (3.5-6.9 units per acre) and is proposed for a mix of 50 R-2 single family parcels and 41 townhomes. According to the applicant's submittal, the net density of this area comes out to 3.91 units per acre. The middle urban portion of the plat is guided for Low Density Residential uses (2.0- 3.49 units per acre. This area is proposed for 65 single family units, 14 of which are proposed to be zoned R-1 and 51 of which are proposed to be zoned R-2. The purpose statement of the R-1 District states that the intent of the district is to implement the Low Density Residential land use category of the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose statement of the R-2 District states that the intent of the district is to implement the Medium Density Residential land use category of the Comprehensive Plan. As proposed, there are a preponderance of lots not intended for this land use classification. Staff recommends that the parcels in Block 5 should meet the standards of the R-1 district. The Commission and Council should also discuss if the portion of Block 4 south of the land use district dividing line should be R-1 parcels as well. No changes to the street configuration would be needed to accommodate this change to the plan to include the 90 foot wide R-1 lots. It would simply result in the adjustment of lot lines and the reduction of about 8 single family parcels. A sketch illustrating intent of this change is included in the exhibits. The southern portion of the plat is guided Rural Residential. Most of this area is reserved as wetland with the exception of the area involved in the MUSA swap. Comprehensive Plan Amendment. As mentioned, the applicant is proposing a comprehensive plan amendment to change the land use designation of approximately 3.17 acres of property from Rural Residential to Low Density Residential (as shown in the attached "MUSA Amendment Plan"). In exchange for extending the MUSA line to this location, the applicant is proposing to remove wooded property with the same net 3 area from the MUSA. Overall, the applicant is proposing to preserve an 11.29 acre wooded area (7.43 net acres) along the eastern edge of proposed development. The preserved area would be placed in a conservation easement or otherwise deeded to the City to prohibit any future development of that area. This proposal would maintain the current amount of acres in the MUSA. The proposed amendment would result in swap, which means that no additional residential units would be added to the MUSA. As such, the proposed amendment does not appear to have an effect on existing infrastructure in terms of public utilities, sewer capacity and transportation needs. The comprehensive plan amendment may have negative impacts on existing environmental features due to the further encroachment of the development toward the existing wetland to the south.. However, allowing extension of the MUSA and therefore permanently preserving a large number of trees would likely be considered a benefit to the City. In consideration of a comprehensive plan amendment, The Planning Commission and City Council should discuss the proposed amendment's consistency with City's future land use and development goals as well as its potential impacts on the existing infrastructure, environmental features and general public health, safety and welfare. Additionally, the comprehensive plan amendment must be evaluated in terms of its consistency with regional systems under the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Council. The City's forestry consultant has advised that remnants of a maple -basswood forest exist within the southeast portion of the proposed MUSA amendment area and has recommended that this area be preserved, as depicted in this current proposal. Final approval of the comprehensive plan amendment is given by the Metropolitan Council following a decision by the City Council. Preliminary discussions with Metropolitan Council staff indicated that the proposed amendment would not have a negative impact on regional systems. Zoning. The site is currently zoned PUD2, Planned Unit Development 2. This zoning was adopted prior to the most recent update of the Comprehensive Plan and is no longer consistent with the City's Future Land Use plan. As such, the site must be rezoned to accommodate medium and low density residential uses. As noted above, the subject site is guided for medium density residential on north half, low density residential in the mid -portion of the site and rural residential on the far southern portion of the site. The applicant is requesting rezoning to Residential -Mid Density District (R-3) for townhomes, Two Family Residential District (R-2) for the majority of the proposed single family lots and Single Family Residential District (R-1) for the single family lots proposed along south property line, within the MUSA extension area. When considering rezoning of a property, the Planning Commission and City Council should consider the proposed action's effect on the area in which it is planned. The 4 Zoning Ordinance does not contain specific criteria for the evaluation of a zoning map amendment, however, general planning criteria should be evaluated against the proposal to ensure that the requested rezoning is warranted including: • consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; • the proposed action's compatibility with existing and future land uses in the area; • and the proposed action's impacts to the City's infrastructure including utilities, transportation as well as community facilities such as parks and schools. The following table illustrates land uses surrounding the subject site. The primary compatibility issue with this subdivision is the transition between the proposed single family lots and the larger rural residential properties to the west, south and east. Direction Land Use Plan Zoning Map Existing Use North Medium Density Residential; Mixed Use - Business UR — Urban Residential; UH — Uptown Hamel Urban single family lots Undeveloped East Parks and Recreation; Medium Density Residential; Low Density Residential PS — Public/Semi Public; RR-UR — Urban Reserve; RR- Rural Residential Parks and Recreation; Large Lot Single Family; Undeveloped South Rural Residential RR — Rural Residential Agriculture West Rural Residential; Parks and Recreation RR -1 — Rural Residential 1; PS — Public/Semi Public; RR — Rural Residential Rural Residential, Large Lot Single Family; Parks and Recreation The transition between neighborhoods occurs along rear lot lines and across Hunter Drive, which lessens the potential for negative impacts the proposed R-2 District property may have on the adjacent rural residential areas. ANALYSIS SECTION 11— R-1, R-2 AND R-3 DISTRICT STANDARDS Townhomes. Within the northeast corner of the site, 41 townhome units are proposed. The units are designed as attached single family units with three to five units per building. The proposed townhome development is a unit/base lot arrangement with an outlot serving as the commonly -owned base lot. Unit/base lot arrangements consist of each townhome unit resting on a "unit lot" which is a few feet larger on all sides than the footprint of the townhome unit. Buildings have a shared "zero lot line" with the attached units on all sides. Each unit lot is then surrounded by the common base lot R-3 District zoning is proposed for the area which allows for multiple family structures (up to 16 units per building) as a permitted use. The applicant's proposed townhome models are similar to those found at a development called "Legacy Park" at County Road 47 and Vicksburg in Plymouth, although the units are proposed a bit further apart in the Enclave. 5 Net Area Per Unit. Section 841.1.05, Subd. 2 of the Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum net area per unit of 8,750 square feet within the R-3 District. The applicant is also proposing a recreation area and improved sound suppression between townhome units, which allows for a total additional density in the amount of 0.75 units per acre, or 5.75 units per net acre. The current plan is proposing 41 units within an area containing 7.59 net acres. This appears to be consistent with the requirements. Setbacks. The required setback from a private street for buildings within the R-3 District is 25 feet. The applicant is proposing a street setback of 25 feet which allows for a face-to-face building separation of 70 to 74 feet in this area. A setback of 30 feet between buildings is shown on the submitted plans as required. Because the proposed townhome development abuts less intensive zoning districts on all sides, a 40 -foot setback from the site perimeter is required. The submitted plans have shown that the proposed development is compliant with this requirement. Private Streets. All streets serving the townhome development are proposed to be private streets. The interior streets are proposed to be 24 -feet wide, with the main roads being increased to 28. Guest Parking. Fifteen guest parking stalls are proposed to serve the development. The Zoning Ordinance requires at least two parking spaces per dwelling unit. Attached two -car garage stalls are proposed for each townhome unit and two additional parking spaces per unit would be available by utilizing each unit's driveway. Visitors to the townhome units may end up parking along the public streets in the single family area where parking would be allowed on one side of the street. This may lead to traffic congestion and unnecessary crowding of the public street. Each townhome unit is proposed to include an attached two -car garage consisting of 368 square feet. Section 828.51, Subd. 2 of the Zoning Ordinance, which outlines the City's general parking provisions, requires all parking spaces to be at least nine (9) feet wide and twenty (20) feet long. The proposed two -car garages are narrower than the Ordinance requirements for two parking spaces. It may prove to be difficult to contain a household's vehicles, recreational equipment, trash receptacles and other domestic supplies in a 368 square foot space. Issues that may result from undersized garages usually include nuisance complaints due to trash receptacles being stored outside and multiple vehicles and other household equipment occupying space in the driveway. With these constraints in mind, it would be appropriate for the City to require additional guest parking to avoid conflicts and to ensure the units are accessible and the site is orderly and attractive. A nominal standard of space per unit would be enough to alleviate concerns and keep the integrity of the site circulation. The site would need to have six additional guest parking stalls to accommodate this condition. Ideally, the extra stalls will be dispersed through as much of the site as feasible to facilitate their convenient use. 6 Landscaping. The applicant has submitted a revised landscaping plan that appears to meet the standards of the ordinance. Final review and determination of escrow amounts shall be required prior to installation at the time of site plan review. Building Design. Buildings in the R-3 District are limited to 32 feet in height. The proposed townhome buildings are shown to be 26 feet in height. The applicant is proposing to construct the townhome units using primarily vinyl lap siding and vinyl shakes. Accent materials include stone and brick. Section 841.4.02, Subd.1(b) requires no less than 20 percent of the fagade facing a public or private street to consist of accent materials. It appears as though the proposed townhome exterior meets this requirement, however, this must be verified during the required site and building plan review prior to construction. The proposed townhome building design appears to meet the building modulation and articulation requirements, however, this would be more thoroughly reviewed during the site and building plan review. Site and Building Plan Review. Prior to construction of the townhome units, the applicant would be required to submit an application for site and building plan review as outlined in Section 825.55 of the Zoning Ordinance. Single Family Lot Requirements. Section 840.1.05 and Section 840.2.05 of the Zoning Ordinance outline the lot requirements for the R-1 and R-2 Districts. Additionally, Section 820.29, Subd. 4 of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that all lots must contain buildable area at least equal to the minimum lot area requirements of the zoning district exclusive of flood plains, wetlands, areas of excessive high water table, steep slopes and public rights -of -way. The applicant has provided the net lot areas for all proposed lots consistent with those requirements assuming that the area is rezoned to R-1 and R-2 as proposed. The following tables outline the mandatory lot and setbacks requirements for single family lots in the R-1 and R-2 Districts. Zoning District Lot Area Lot Width Lot Depth R-1 11,000 sq. ft. 90 feet 100 ft. R-2 8,000 sq. ft. 60 feet 90 ft. Zoning District Setbacks Front Side Side Corner Rear Wetland Buffer Setback Collector Street Local Street R-1 35 ft. 30 ft. 10/15 ft. 25 ft. 30 ft. 15 ft. R-2 35 ft. 30 ft. 5/10 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. 15 ft. 7 The proposed R-1 and R-2 lots generally appear to meet each district's lot area requirements. The majority of the proposed lots are consistent with setback requirements. Previously, there were two lots that do not demonstrate compliance with rear yard setbacks when shown with an attached deck but the plan has since been revised to address this concern. Driveways. Section 400.11(d) of the City Code requires driveways to be located a minimum of ten (10) feet from the side property line. The majority of the driveways are shown to be located less than ten (10) feet from the property line. These driveways must be shown to demonstrate compliance with Section 400.11(d) of the City Code as a condition of preliminary plat approval unless otherwise waived by the City Council. The R-2 District allows for five (5) foot side yard setbacks along one side of an interior yard. Oftentimes, the five foot side yard setback is shown on the garage side within the proposed plat. Staff recommends that in this instance the ten foot driveway setback requirement be waived for lots proposed within the R-2 District. The Planning Commission and Council should discuss the ten foot driveway setback requirement versus the five foot side yard setback requirement. ANALYSIS : SECTION 111 - GENERAL PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW Access. Hunter Drive extends along the west side of proposed development. Hunter Drive is designated as a minor collector road by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is proposing two access points to the subdivision off of Hunter Drive. Hunter Drive will need to be reconstructed due to this project requiring infrastructure installation to extend utilities. Hunter Drive will need to be reconstructed in conjunction with this project. The City Engineer is currently undertaking a feasibility study report. The developer may finance construction to Medina Road at maximum or to the end of their plat at minimum. The Comprehensive Plan sets forth certain goals and policies for the City's existing and future transportation networks. This plans states that neighborhoods existing neighborhoods should be connected with infill neighborhoods to ensure safety through increased access. The Navajo Road extension is proposed on the plat as "Outlot J". This will need to be depicted as right-of-way with a street design. The City may elect to not have this road constructed, at this time, in which case the City may wish to collect money for the construction of this street but defer construction. The applicant has expressed a desire to explore options for sharing the financing of this street with the City or neighboring property owners. The previous submittal had access points to the development off of Hunter Trail at the park and at Elm Creek Drive. As mentioned, this submission shows a more northerly access. The two original access points allowed for cohesion with the trail plan and provided a four way intersection at Elm Creek Drive. Staff recommends that the plan revert back to these access points. 8 The property included in the plat also includes what is referred to as the "Nolan Parcel" to the north. This property is shown as being served by a cul-de-sac. The City's subdivision ordinance allows cul-de-sacs less than 750 feet in length serving fewer than 20 houses, whichever is less. The proposed cul-de-sac would be about 550 feet in length and serving 16 houses, 9 on the "Nolan Parcel". A cul-de-sac in this location may be acceptable provided it utilizes a center island design to minimize maintenance issues related to snowplowing and such. The interior of the center island would be required for private maintenance. The applicant must submit to the City Engineer and Public Works Director a cul-de-sac design for review and approval. This may result in a slight readjustment of the lots in this area. Traffic Study. The applicant has submitted a traffic study evaluating impacts the proposed development may have on Hunter Drive and its intersection with Elm Creek Drive, Navajo Road and the park driveway. The study concludes that the proposed project's impact on these intersections will not require any additional traffic control devices, including additional turn lanes, to operate at an acceptable level. The City Engineer's office has reviewed the traffic study and the requested additional information and concurs with the assessment that no additional traffic control devices are required to handle additional traffic proposed by this development. Streets. The applicant is proposing 24 and 28 -foot wide private streets within the townhome portion of the development and 28 -foot wide public streets throughout the remaining development. Section 820.29, Subd. 2 of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that local streets be at least 24 feet wide with a 60 -foot right-of-way. The applicant is requesting approval of a variance to allow for a 50 -foot right-of-way along all public local streets in the single family area. No public right-of-way is proposed within the townhome development. The applicant claims that the reduction in right-of-way will allow for a reduced amount of impervious surfaces and assist in meeting density requirements. While a reduced right-of-way would result in shorter driveway lengths (presumably five feet shorter on each side of the street) it does also have the effect of placing the homes closer together and narrowing street thoroughfare through the neighborhood. Furthermore, reduction of the public right-of-way allows for condensed area for placement of public utilities, sidewalks, etc. Consideration of a variance shall include evaluation of the review criteria set forth in Section 825.45 of the Zoning Ordinance. Variance Review Criteria. Section 820.59, Subd. 1 of the Subdivision Ordinance outlines the criteria for consideration of a variance from subdivision ordinance provisions. The applicant is seeking a variance from the ROW requirements. A variance may only be granted in the event that all of the following circumstances exist: (a) Because of particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the specific parcels of land involved, a particular hardship to the owner would result if the strict letter of this ordinance were carried out. 9 (b) The conditions upon which the application for the variance is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and are not common to other properties in the City. (c) The hardship is related to the requirements of these regulations and has not been created by any persons presently or formerly having an interest in the parcel of land. (d) That granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel of land is located. The applicant is seeking approval of the variance to reduce impervious surface impacts of the proposed development. It does not appear that the variance is being requested to alleviate a hardship, however, the City has approved flexibility in ROW width in the past in order to reduce impervious surface impacts. Sidewalks. The applicant is proposing to install sidewalks along one side of all public streets within the single family area: The proposed layout of the sidewalks appears to minimize street crossings. Most existing sidewalks in the City are 5 -feet in width, and the applicant will be required to install similar sidewalk subject to City review. Blocks. Section 820.29, Subd. 3 of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that blocks be arranged to provide for the most convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street design. Block length shall be 300 feet to 1,300 feet unless a special exception is granted by the City Council. Proposed block lengths fall within the range of 300 feet to 1,300 feet and are therefore consistent with ordinance requirements. Outlots. There are several outlots proposed in the plat for storm ponds, wetlands, and open space. Outlot H should be split between the area that is in the MUSA and out of the MUSA. Other outlots may need to be split, as well, depending on planned ownership. Landscaping. Section 840.3.04 of the Zoning Ordinance outlines landscaping requirements for single family lots in the R-1 and R-2 District. All areas of a lot except for buildings, driveways, walks, patios, recreational areas, wetlands and wetland buffers are to be landscaped with trees, shrubs, plantings or turf grass. Section 840.3.04, Subd. 2(b) of the Zoning Ordinance encourages the use of low maintenance and water conserving alternatives to traditional Kentucky bluegrass. The applicant is proposing a special drought resistant grass specification that would alleviate the need for irrigation on the parcels. The City currently requires lawn irrigation through alternative means such as storm ponds, rather than utilizing treated City water. The applicant will be expected to escrow for the establishment of yards and landscaping through the building permit process. In the event that there are severe issues with the special grass specification, City Staff recommends an escrow for the cost of installing 10 an irrigation system that will utilize storm water. The use of the escrow will be triggered at the determination of the City. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of two (2) overstory trees to be planted per lot within fifteen (15) feet of the front lot line. The applicant is proposing two overstory trees per lot which are 2.5 caliper inches and include a mix of Linden, Hackberry, Honey Locust, Princeton and Valley Forge Elm, Red and Sugar Maple and Red Oak trees. Buffer Yards. Section 828.31 of the Zoning Ordinance describes the City's buffer yard requirements. Buffer yards are required along Hunter Drive as well as between zoning districts with differing intensity of uses. The applicant has proposed a buffer yard along Hunter Drive with an opacity of 0.3 as required. Another buffer yard is shown between the proposed townhome development and the proposed single family lots. This buffer yard was originally shown as a 0.1 opacity, however, it has since been revised for this submission to meet the standard of 0.2. A buffer yard was included to the properties to the east which appears to meet requirements. The buffer yard planting schedule shall be revised to include any necessary plantings to the north to be consistent with ordinance requirements as a condition of preliminary plat approval. Tree Preservation / Tree Removal. The applicant is proposing to mass grade the site as each phase is developed. The City's tree preservation ordinance allows for up to 15 percent of the significant trees located on the site to be removed for such site development activities without requiring replacement. If removal is proposed in excess of this amount, Section 828.41, Subd. 9(c)(i) requires a tree replacement ratio of a diameter of one (1) caliper inch per one (1) caliper inch of removed significant trees. Originally, the applicant was proposing to remove 8,585.8 caliper inches of the existing significant trees on the site (34.8 percent of the total significant trees). This has been reduced to 5,557 inches. As required by the Ordinance, 1,848 caliper inches of trees must be replaced. Any comments from the City's forestry consultant's should be addressed on the revised tree preservation plan. Park and Trail Dedication. City Staff recommends the City give credit for the land under the trails and the construction of the trails outside of the right-of-ways and recommends the remainder be dedicated as cash -in -lieu. The Parks Commission will review this plan at their October meeting. Entrance Monuments. The applicant is proposing to install large monument signs near the entrances of the proposed development. Such signs must be consistent with the City's sign ordinance and shall be subject to review and approval by City staff prior to erection on the site. Easements. Drainage and utility easements are shown at the perimeter of all lots as well as over all outlots, wetlands and stormwater ponds. 11 It should be noted that easements within side yards located between single family homes can pose problems when homeowners landscape or fence the area. Equipment and vehicles need at least a 20 -foot wide clear space to maintain the ponds and oftentimes homeowners are unaware of this easement and place things in the easement that can cause issues when maintenance of stormwater ponds and wetlands is necessary. Furthermore, several of the proposed single family lots extend into the storm water ponds. City staff generally discourages against extension of lot lines into ponds. Staff recommends revising the plan to place stormwater ponds within a designated outlot and enclosed with a drainage and utility easement. Also, there is a blanket easement on the property in favor of Wright -Hennepin Electric. This applicant must resolve this issue in such a fashion that allows for the easement to be removed, released, relocated, or placed on the property in such a fashion that it does not interfere with the plat. Wetlands, grading, drainage and utilities. The existing topography of the site is generally flat and does not contain significant slopes (slopes of 12 percent or higher). The proposed grading of the site will change dramatically in some areas. The applicant is proposing to mass grade the site as each phase develops. The majority of the single family homes being proposed have walk -out or look -out basements. The applicant is proposing to add four inch caliper trees, as opposed to the two and a half inch caliper trees required by Ordinance, which will aid in the screening of the proposed changes in grade and the view of the new homes from the right-of-way and adjacent properties. Issues related to wetlands, grading, stormwater, erosion control, irrigation, water and sewer, sump pumps and other utilities shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and shall be made a condition of preliminary plat approval. LID and Sustainability. The applicant proposes to install a number of decentralized bio-filtration basins in order to achieve the City's water quality standards, which is consistent with low -impact development practices. Lennar also proposes to implement its "powersmart" construction practices which increase energy efficiency beyond general code requirements. The developer has also discussed utilizing alternative ground cover as opposed to Kentucky -Bluegrass sod, which could reduce lawn irrigation needs. However, the plan otherwise generally follows "standard" development practices, including mass grading of the site and removing almost every tree within the proposed area where construction is proposed. The applicant has reduced proposed wetland impacts, although a small area is proposed on wetland #4. EAW. LENNAR submitted an Environmental Site Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed development. An EAW is a screening tool used to evaluate any potential environmental impacts the proposed development may have on the area. The EAW process is complete, and few comments were received from agencies and individuals. 12 On August 17, 2010, the City Council determined that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required for this project. Phasing Plan. The applicant is proposing five phases of construction. The first phase will include 25 single family homes in the northwest corner of the site. The second phase will include 43 single family homes, the third phase will include 20 single family homes, and final the final two phases will include the remaining 27 single family lots as well as the 41 townhome units. It is assumed that future phases will be platted as outlots concurrent with the final platting of the first phase of the development. As future phases receive final plat approval, consistency with the approved preliminary plat shall be strictly adhered to. Full build -out of the proposed development as presented in the preliminary plat is required in order to maintain consistency with the density requirements of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Development Contract. Following approval of a preliminary plat, the applicant is required to enter into a development contract with the City to be executed prior to consideration of a final plat by the City Council. The development contract, which specifies all conditions of approval, applicable fees and securities to be provided for required improvements, is subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. "Nolan Parcel". There is property to the north which is included in the subject property being proposed for subdivision that is not included in all pages of the plan set. This area is known as the "Nolan Parcel", however, it is not an independent parcel. The applicant should include this parcel in the preliminary plat and phasing plan. The site shall be zoned R-2 and may be split off at the time of the first final plat as an outlot with development rights for the configuration shown. In the future, the preliminary plat may be revised for the area of this parcel referred to as the "Nolan Parcel", if desired by interested parties. SUMMARY OF ISSUES Based on staffs review of the submitted comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, variance and preliminary plat applications for The Enclave development, the following items are considered to be outstanding issues that need resolution prior to granting final approval of the applications. If these issues can be resolved, City Staff would recommend approval of the applications: 1. Block 5 and Lots 5-15 of Block 4 shall meet all R-1 Standards. 2. The northern access point to Hunter Drive shall be relocated to Elm Creek Drive. 3. Lot lines shall be removed from the storm ponds. 4. Six more guest parking stalls shall be located in the townhome area. 5. An escrow shall be provided for an irrigation system. 6. Hunter Drive reconstruction shall be provided for, the extent of which should be discussed by the City Council, but at a minimum to the southern edge of the plat. 7. The "Nolan Parcel" shall be included in the plat, zoned R-2, and included in the phasing plan. 13 8. HOA documents depicting responsibilities towards all private open space, private parks, center islands, storm ponds, wetlands, buffer yards, common open space, and landscaping areas shall be provided. 9. Covenants restricting all R-2 lots to single family residential units shall be provided to ensure qualifying lots are not developed for duplexes. 10. Navajo Road shall be dedicated as a ROW with a street constructed with the appropriate phase, or escrow paid to the City for future construction. 11. The easement on the parcel in favor of Wright -Hennepin Electric shall be resolved. 12. Outlot H shall be split into two outlots, one in the MUSA and one out. 13. The driveways in the R-2 District shall be allowed with a 5 foot setback. 14. All comments by the City Engineer shall be addressed. 15. All comments by the City Attorney related to title issues and recording procedures shall be addressed. 16. All comments by the City Forestry Consultant shall be addressed. 17. The City will accept the land under the trails and the construction of the trails outside of right-of-ways as parkland dedication and the remainder will be cash -in - lieu unless otherwise determined by the City Council upon review of the Park Commission recommendation. POSSIBLE ACTIONS A. Motion to recommend approval of the requested comprehensive plan amendment. Staff recommends approval of the comprehensive plan amendment as depicted by the attachment provided by City Staff. B. Motion to recommend denial of the requested comprehensive plan amendment. C. Motion to recommend approval of the requested rezoning, variance and preliminary plat for The Enclave provided that the applicant resolves the issues set forth in the planning report and those discussed at the public hearing. D. Motion to deny the rezoning, variance and preliminary plat for The Enclave as outlined in the Findings of Fact. (Exhibit 5) E. Motion to table. If made, this motion should be supported with direction to the applicant on the issues identified above, and any others raised at the hearing, so the applicant can revise the development proposal documents for submission to the City prior to the next Planning Commission meeting. Because the Planning Commission has already requested changes and been able to review the updated plans, staff recommends that the Commission make recommendations for approval or denial in order to allow the City Council to review and make a decision prior to the review deadline. c. Dusty Finke Debra Peterson -Dufresne Tom Kellogg Ron Batty 14 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com September 30, 2010 Mr. Dusty Finke City Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: The Enclave of Medina File No. 000190-10000-1 Plat No. L-10-055 Dear Dusty, Bonestroo We have reviewed the revised plans for The Enclave of Medina development. The plan set is dated 9-15-10. Our following comments are general in nature due to many on -going changing aspects of the plan: • The water supply and distribution plan shows a looped 12 -inch watermain connection from Hunter Drive to Brockton Lane. The land use plan shows rural residential south and west of the Enclave development. We would recommend that 12 -inch watermain be installed along the south development roads for a future Brockton Lane connection via Navajo Road East (to the stub near SAN MH 14). The existing south 12 -inch watermain stub to Hunter Drive may be eliminated; however we recommend keeping the 10 foot wide easement in place for potential future system expansion. • All utilities and manholes should be located within the proposed right-of-way. The right-of- way should be widened to 60' to better accommodate the road, sidewalk, and utilities. • All sanitary sewer manholes should be located outside of the roadway and sidewalk or trail. • Normal and high water levels should be shown on all wetlands. • A sewer stub should be provided from MH 14 to the future right-of-way to the SE. • EOFs should be labeled for all ponds and wetlands. • Although this comment is provided in previous letters, we want to stress the importance of not extending lot lines into wetlands and wetland buffers. • Storm sewer calculations and a drainage area map should be submitted for review. • See Johns Smyth's wetland review comments attached memo dated 9-29-10. City of Medina Page 2 The Enclave of Medina 9/30/2010 If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (651) 604-4894 or by email at darren.amundsen@bonestroo.com. Sincerely, BONESTROO Darren Amundsen Cc: Tom Kellogg John Smyth Dan Edgerton Memorandum To: Darren Amundsen, Tom Project: The Enclave Kellogg Development Date: September 29, 2010 From: John Smyth Client: City of Medina Re: Wetland Review File No: 190-10000 Enclave The following are items that should be addressed in future submittals. Wetland Hydrology (Drainage Areas) I have concerns that the drainage areas to the wetlands (wetland 4A, 11, 12) are being significantly reduced as a result of storm sewer routing flows around the wetlands. This could result in a reduction of hydrology and loss of these wetlands. As mentioned in the June 8th memo pre -development and post - development drainage areas should be provided for all wetlands that exist on - site to insure that hydrology is being maintained to the wetlands. Storm sewer will be required to be modified to maintain drainage area to wetlands. Wetland Outlets The following are internal wetlands and there existing outlets and comments on the proposed outlets. Outlet elevations below are based on two foot contours and spot elevation may be more accurate. Wetland 4B: Natural Overflow approx. 1006 artificially lowered with tile — If possible restore natural outlet elevation. If not possible explain why. Wetland 4: Natural Overflow approx. 1009.5 lowered by a ditch. If possible restore natural outlet elevation. If not possible explain why. Wetland 11 & 13: Natural Overflow approx. 1008. Maintain natural overflow elevation and designate overflow point and permanently stabilize. Show how flows will be routed downstream of trail (trail overflow elev., culvert, etc.) Wetland 12: Natural Overflow approx. 1007. Maintain natural overflow elevation and designate overflow point and permanently stabilize. Wetland 10: Natural Overflow approx. 1008. Maintain natural overflow. Show how flows will be routed downstream of trail (trail overflow elev., culvert, etc.) City Code for Wetland Protection The City Code for Wetland Protection will need to be followed and the required submittals provided. The below sections of the code should be reviewed. • Application materials per subp. 4. • Buffers and setbacks per subp. 5. • Upland Buffer Zone Markers per subp. 7 F:\Bonestroo Templates \St PauFMemorandum.dot [CRW 9-2008] Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com " Vegetation Performance Standards for Upland Buffer Zones per subp. 8 " Maintenance per subp. 9 " Mitigation per subp. 10 Pap 2oft Member Weir introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2010-56 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE ENCLAVE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410 contains the requirements for the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board ("EQB") Environmental Review Program; and WHEREAS, the City prepared an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW), for a proposed residential subdivision located on 109 acres in Medina consisting of 140 single-family homes, 42 attached townhomes and an association owned Community Park with a pool and pool house, commonly referred to the Enclave (the "Project"), in accordance with the Environmental Review Program of the EQB; and WHEREAS, on June 15, 2010, the City, as the Responsible Governmental Unit ("RGU") for preparation of the Enclave EAW approved the EAW for distribution to the EQB distribution list and interested parties; and WHEREAS, the EAW was published in the June 28, 2010 edition of the EQB Monitor, which started the required 30 -day public comment period that commenced on June 28, 2010 and ended on July 28, 2010; and WHEREAS, the RGU received five comments letters that are incorporated as Exhibit A, attached hereto, and the City has determined that the comments received do not support the need for an EIS on the proposed project; and WHEREAS, responses were prepared for comment letters received and these responses are provided in Exhibit B, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Rules, Section 4410.1700, the RGU shall base its decision regarding the need for an Environmental Impact Statement ("EIS") on the information gathered during the EAW process, the comments received on the EAW, and the criteria established by the EQB to determined whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effects as provided in the Findings of Fact; and WHEREAS, after considering the EAW, the comments on the EAW, and the responses Resolution No. 2010-56 August 17, 2010 to comments, the City Council has determined that the Enclave does not have potential for significant environmental effects that cannot be addressed in the Project design and permit development processes and that preparation of an EIS for the project is not required, based on the following Findings of Fact: (1) Findings related to: the type, extent, and reversibility of environmental effects: The EAW and Response to Comments summarizes the type and extent of impacts to the natural environment. The proposed Project includes measures to mitigate impacts to the environment as described in the EAW and response comments. Design features such as erosion control measures, storm water management systems, sanitary sewer systems, and water systems are planned to minimize impacts on water quality. Improvements will also be made to water and sewer utility services to support new development. The development will be using low water, low maintenance specialized turf throughout the development. This turf grass will be installed by the developer and be required of all homes and maintained common spaces. Ideally, the irrigation system as described in the EAW is not needed by the development, but is currently being considered as a backup plan. Installation of the irrigation system will be driven by need at a later date and is not planned at this time. With the irrigation restrictions in place for this development project, a reduction in water usage rates per person is expected. The irrigation well design and installations will be closely coordinated with the City of Medina to ensure an adequate municipal water supply. Aquifer performance tests on future irrigation and city municipal wells will be required as part of the design and installation processes. Seasonal variation and long-term regional aquifer decline will be considered in the design and performance of the new welts. Full and proper well development will be achieved during well installation to reduce drawdown and increase well performance. The City of Medina will have the authority to restrict or prohibit the use of the irrigation wells should they threaten the municipal water supply. Any potential effects that are reasonably likely to occur from this Project would not be irreversible. The expected effects as a result of the ongoing operation of the residential development are minimal. There is no reason to believe that the ongoing operations of the Project will cause a significant negative environmental effect. The potential impacts of ongoing operations that are reasonably expected to occur have been considered during the environmental review process and design features to mitigate these impacts have been developed. (2) Findings related to: the Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects: Cumulative impacts of this project include the reconstruction of Hunter Drive within the same general alignment and width. Improvements will also be made to water and sewer utility services to support new development. A relatively small area will be added to the MUSA boundary, however, the City recently completed a Comprehensive Plan that addresses the cumulative impacts of development on a city wide basis. The addition of MUSA land was reviewed and determined not to cause impacts beyond what was planned in Resolution No. 2010-56 2 August 17, 2010 the Comprehensive plan. An equal amount of the extended MUSA area (6.5 acres) is being reguided to Public thus there is no additional net acreage of development that will occur beyond what was planned for in the Comprehensive Plan and utility planning. There are no other future known projects that may interact with this proposed project to cause cumulative impacts. As the adjoining undeveloped parcels develop there will be connections to the trunk utilities and the proposed public streets. This development will install the utilities and provide connection points for the existing neighborhoods and the undeveloped parcels. In summary, taking into account past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects, this project may have a potential positive cumulative impact on the environment for the limited reasons stated above. It is noted that agency comments did not disclose any cumulative effects of any related, past, present or future projects. It is not anticipated that the project has the potential for adverse cumulative impacts. (3) Findings related to: the extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority: The proposed The EAW and Response to Comments identified areas where potential Project environmental effects exist and appropriate mitigation measures have been or will be incorporated into Project design and required permits. The City is the government agency with primary regulatory authority over the Project, although other government approvals and permits identified in the EAW must also be obtained. The City will condition approval of the Preliminary Plat, and Rezoning, on the mitigation measures identified through the EAW process and response to comments, establishing an escrow account for the compliance with all applicable City ordinances, and compliance, MnDNR, Met Council, MPCA and all other applicable permit and regulatory requirements to minimize environmental effects. The Project Development Agreement will incorporate these conditions as well. (4) Findings related to: the extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other available environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer, including other EISs: The following documents were reviewed as part of the environmental review for the proposed The Enclave project. This list is not exhaustive. • City of Medina Comprehensive/Critical Area Plan and Zoning Ordinance ■ City of Medina Stormwater Management Plan • Metropolitan Council 2030 Regional Development Framework • Enclave PUD, Preliminary Plan, and Rezoning Application ■ Minnesota Department of Natural Resources correspondence • Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office correspondence ■ Phase 1 and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment ■ Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Based on the review of other studies and this EAW, along with comments from the reviewing agencies and members of the public, the City of Medina finds that there are no elements of Resolution No. 2010-56 3 August 17, 2010 the Project that pose the potential for significant environmental effects that cannot be addressed in the Project design and permit development processes, or by local plans. Based on the environmental review, the City of Medina finds that the environmental effects of the proposed Project that are reasonably expected to occur can be anticipated and controlled. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA, that the environmental review requirements of Minnesota Statutes and the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Environmental Review Program have been met by the Environmental Assessment Worksheet prepared for this Project. The potential for environmental effects is not considered significant, and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not needed. Dated: August 17, 2010. T.M. Crosby, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Chad M. Adams, City Administrator -Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Johnson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Crosby, Weir, Johnson, Siitari, Smith And the following voted against same: None Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2010-56 4 August 17, 2010 Ta-1 c,or-s /NJ 12- '-'2.- APe-A- Ti> 175.Nlbt�sZ"f-A"TC G,JNtPU wIM' C -47(v6- pub AN1> -z4.NIN-6. Fr--0)(1sloNs I Ft Pavrtr-wn t4to en r. mes7 34c44 Tv tievt cfze5 1=PN/E wry "i‘et. c " LENNAR 411 SATHRE-UERGQUISTT INC; C NSERVATION ARIA: Reamed 143 As Meg loic 143 or Ip*r (L..*d Swap 3 1` a Ad4II UpirM beside MESA 1,76 a^. 4JMoa Oat*Yde MISA Geo.* Am 1040 se MUSA IASI) SISAP* cpimd M1etlYd Me11.md LOW Gross Ana 1J? is OAY K 031.1 3.0 ac 11At.R* *THIN- MIA �..'�� Cl/AND LAND SMAt AREA 11,1` K SIVS3 A.MI.SDMEN1 ARIA O. .1, EXISTING M USA LINE EXISEING PRUROSED.1 SITU UNE AGENDA ITEM: 8 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner DATE: October 6, 2010 MEETING: October 12, 2010 Planning Commission SUBJ: Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Amending the Future Land Use of certain property to the Commercial or Medium Density Residential land use Zoning Map Amendment — An ordinance rezoning certain properties to the Commercial -Highway (CH) or Rural Residential -Urban Reserve (RR-UR) zoning district — Public Hearing Background Last month, the City Council adopted four ordinances which rezoned approximately 250 parcels within the City in order to be consistent with the updated Comprehensive Plan. During these discussions, the owners of three properties discussed their desire for altemative zoning designations from what the City was proposing. After discussing their request, the City Council removed these three properties from the ordinances, and directed staff to process alternative zoning map amendments for these parcels. The subject properties are located northeast of the intersection of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive, as highlighted in the map to the right. The table at the bottom of this page summarizes the proposed changes for the three properties. -7;53 MEDINA Proposed Rezonings Proposed Zoning District MI CH RR-UR Map Date October 1. 2010 0 I as :.000 Map ID# PID x Future Land Use (current) Future Land Use (proposed) Proposed Zoning District 1 02-118-23-33-0003 Mixed Use Mixed Use Rural Residential -Urban Reserve (RR-UR) -- 02-118-23-34-0002 Mixed Use Medium Density Residential Rural Residential- Urban Reserve (RR-UR) 3 02-118-23-34-0003 Mixed Use Commercial Commercial -Highway (CH) Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Page 1 of 3 Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) October 12, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting ..000 For Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment The City is proposing a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to amend the Future Land Use designation of the parcels identified as #2 and #3. When the City adopted the Comp Plan, these parcels were combined into a single 40 -acre parcel. The property was guided Mixed Use in order to allow for a mix of residential and commercial uses across the 40 -acres. After the Comp Plan was approved, the property owners split the parcels through a land division which was exempt from subdivision review. When considering the city-wide rezoning, the Planning Commission and City Council discussed how to zone the two parcels at length. The consensus appeared to be that if the properties would have been two parcels when updating the Comp Plan, that it was likely that the City would not have guided both for Mixed Use. The consensus was also that a Mixed Use zoning designation for both properties was not ideal. As a result, the City Council directed staff to prepare a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for consideration. Staff recommends that parcel #2 be guided for Medium Density Residential (MDR) land use and that parcel #3 be guided for Commercial (C) land use, as shown by the map below. These designations are consistent with surrounding properties, as the parcel to the immediate south is guided Commercial, the property to the northwest is guided Medium Density Residential, and the property to the east is guided Mixed Use. MEDINA Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Proposed Future Land Use - Commercial (C) Medium Density Res ;Wpm -35-6.99tea Map Date October 1, 2010 D , DOC 2.606 4.603 Feet Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Page 2 of 3 October 12, 2010 Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) Planning Commission Meeting The property owners of parcel #1 were also part of the Planning Commission and City Council discussions about the city-wide rezoning. Because the property is adjacent to the parcels being proposed to be changed, the City Council directed staff to discuss with the owners if a change of future land use should be proposed for their lot as well. Following consultation, the owners and City staff concurred that the existing Mixed Use designation is preferable. Proposed Rezonings The map on the first page of this report identifies the proposed zoning district for the three properties being discussed. Staff recommends that parcel #3 be rezoned to the Commercial Highway (CH) zoning district. This designation is the same as the property to the immediate south, and would be consistent with the new guiding. During the city-wide rezoning discussion, staff recommended the RR-UR district for properties which have been guided for Mixed Use or sewered residential development, but are currently not served by city services. The Planning Commission and City Council endorsed this recommendation. As such, staff recommends rezoning parcels #1 and #2 to the RR-UR district. Attachments 1. DRAFT resolution approving amendment to Comprehensive Plan 2. DRAFT ordinance rezoning properties Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Page 3 of 3 October 12, 2010 Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) Planning Commission Meeting Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 20104# RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REGARDING THE FUTURE LAND USE OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 55 AND ARROWHEAD DRIVE WHEREAS, the City of Medina proposes to amend its Comprehensive Plan to change the Future Land Use designation of certain properties generally located northeast of the intersection of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is technical in nature, does not substantially change the type of development that is planned to occur in the area, has no practical impact on the City's population forecasts or Traffic Assignment Zone allocations, and is not located within one quarter mile of an adjacent jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the planning commission held a duly called public hearing on October 12, 2010, where testimony was heard from all interested parties and following the hearing recommended approval of the amendment; and WHEREAS, on October 19, 2010, the city council reviewed the amendment, considered the recommendations of the planning commission and heard comments from interested parties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the City of Medina, Minnesota, that the Comprehensive Plan amendment as identified in Exhibit A, attached hereto, is hereby approved. The amendment shall not become effective until approved by the Metropolitan Council and formally adopted by the City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that city staff is authorized to submit the amendment of the Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council for review. Dated: DATE T.M. Crosby, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Chad M. Adams, City Administrator -Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2010-## 1 DATE DRAFT 10-12-2010 Planning Commission Exhibit A Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Proposed Amendment to Map 5-2: change Future Land Use designation of parcels as shown below. Proposed Amendment: Existing: 40.8 gross acre (37.02 net acre) Mixed Use 65 forecasted households (50% of buildable at 3.5-6.99 WA) Proposed. 22.86 gross acre (19.18 net acre) Medium Density Residential 67 forecasted households (3 5-6.99 U/A) 17.94 gross acre (17.84 net acre) Commercial Map 5-2 MEDINA Future Land Use Plan Guide Plan Riot Res denpal - agriculture Dere•opre-Post 2030 Lox Denvy Res 20- 3.490:? Median' Denali), Res 3.5 - 6.99 J'%. - High Density Res 7 - 30 U%A - AA red Use 3 5 - 6 95 iia - Mtred use - Bus.ness 7 • as U,. - Commercial - General Business INEIndust': Business FrGate Recrealon fPR EC'' - Park, and Recreaton - F -R - State or Regions Dpen Soace - Puler Sera -Putty, 0 U.n. Closed Safinar, _ar.dfili 19,91.000.4 ay 'rtss map 0 not pe"ecti precis d tuu houraaries toy vary and stand le field veer, Mao .tea:et '.0-7-_0'D Last Amended Propo;ec t;rae- adoyaea N7ierre '7 20{c - arcei do s c,rre,, at or ether 0025 t,TMZcee I0 4 !lac 53 5.0:0, 1.30 003 Resolution No. 2010-## 2 DRAFT DATE 10-12-2010 Planning Commission Proposed Amendment to Table 5-B: delete the stricken text and insert the underlined text as shown below. TABLE 5-B Future Land Use Plan Land Use Designation Gross Alga Ne Area Ades Percent Awes Pere Agricultural (AG) Rural Residential (RR) Low Density Residential (LDR) Medium Density Residential (MDR) High Density Residential (HDR) Mixed Use (MU) Mixed Use - Business (MU -B) Developing Post -2030 Commercial (C) General Business (GB) Industrial (IB) Closed Sanitary Landfill (SL) Public Semi -Public (PSP) Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation - Regional or State Private Recreation (PREC) Open Space (OS) Rights -of -Way Lakes Wetlands and Floodplains 108 7,978 0.6% 75 0.4% 45.9% 5,087 29.3% 944 428151 r 5.5% 630 3.7% t 2.6% 288 307 1.7%, ta 123 379 3311 I 0.7% 103 0.6% 2.2% 1,9% 271 234 1.6% % 59 0.3% 39 0.2% 444 408 421 559 68 192 271 93 2.6% 337 1.9% 2/1% 2 29030$ 1.7% La 3.2% 359 1 2.1% 0.4% 48 0.3% 1.1% 106 0.6% 1.6% 173 1.0% 0.5% 46 0.3% 2,519 358 208 912 1,283 14.5% % 2.1% 1,528 8.8% 272 1.6% 1.2% 153 0.9% 5.1% 912 5.1% 7.4% 1,283 7.4% 5,335 j 30.8% Total City 17,335 17,335 Resolution No. 2010-## 3 DRAFT DATE 10-12-2010 Planning Commission Proposed Amendment to Table 5-C: delete the strieken text and insert the underlined text as shown below. TABLE 5-C Net Residential Density (Assuming Lowest of Density Range) Lend Use # of Units Gross Acres Acres Undevelopalde1 Net Acres ` Commercial Net Acres Resit ial Net Density (UratslA re) A B C D E = B - (C+D) A I E Existing LDR 486 346 55 291 1.7 Existing MDR 497 181 17 164 3.0 Existing HDR 140 17 2 15 9.3 Future LDR 678 598 259 339 2.0 Future MDR 434 501 247 270 12312 1-24.M 3.5 Future HDR 616 106 18 88 7.0 Future MU2 473 408 379 318 109105 135na 1351162 3.5 Future MU -B3 273 59 20 393 7.0 TOTAL 3497 3.599 1;933-1,915 603 502 4.36 ]cif 1,1051,197 3.01 • 1 Acres Undevelopable include wetlands, floodplains, and steep slope 2 The Mixed Use (MU) land use requires residential units equivalent o the minimum density over at least half of the deve opable area 3 The Mixed Use -Business (MU -B) land use equires residential units equivalent to the minimum density over the entire developable area Proposed Amendment to Table 5-D: delete the strieken text and insert the underlined text as shown below. TABLE 5-D Net Residential Density (Assuming Middle of Density Range) Land Use # of Units Gross Acres : Acres Undevelopable1 Net Ames Commercial Net Ayes Residerlial Net Density (Urets/Acxe) A B C D E=B- (C+D) A I E Existing LDR 486 346 55 291 1.7 Existing MDR 497 181 17 164 3.0 Existing HDR 140 17 2 15 9.3 Future LDR 915 598 259 339 2.7 Future MDR 628 .7 217 270 123 122 4-24 Ltla 5.0 Future HDR 880 106 18 88 10.0 Future MU2 674 580 279 33,8 X3105 135116 135 1162 5.0 Future MU -B3 390 59 20 393 10.0 TOTAL 4,603 1,033 1,915, 603 fa 436 11,fi 4496 LIE 3.85 1 Acres Undevelopable include wetlands, floodplains, and steep slope 2 The Mixed Use (MU) land use requires esidential units equivalent to the minimum density over at least half of the developable area 3 The Mixed Use -Business (MU -B) land use requires residential units equivalent to the minimum density over the entire developable area Resolution No. 2010 llit DATE 4 DRAFT 10-12-2010 Planning Commission Proposed Amendment to Table 5-F: delete the stricken text and insert the underlined text as shown below. Table 5-F Land Use in 5 -Year Increments Residential Uses -Rural Residential 2.5 acres or less -Rural Residential 2.5 -10 acres 1U/10A -Rural Residential 10-40 acres 1U/40A Rural Residential 40+ acres -Agricultural 40+ acres Subtotal Unsewered TBD1 1U/10A 1 U/40A 1U/40A 8086 Low Density Residential (LDR) 2 3.49 Medium Density Residential 3.5 ' 6.9 (MDR) High Density Residential (HDR) 7 30 17 21 21 21 21 123 486% Mixed Use (MU)2 3.5 = 6.9 0 80 207166 207 166 289 23.9 370 338 374 323% Mixed Use — Business (MU -B)3 7 45 5 59 59 59 59 59 0% Future Developing Areas 1U/10A 2501 1954 1372 982 771 444 -77% 2025 2flla o acres) (acres) 1 (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) 212 212 212 212 ? 212 L_ 0% 2197 2207 2217 2227 2237 1.8% 3591 3661 3691 3721 3751 4.5% 1977 1897 1857 1817 1777 -10.1% 109 1 109 I 109 1 109 1 109 1 0% 8086 8086 8086 8086 i 8086 0% 346 600 713 911 944 944 57% 181 326 428 451 428 451 428 451 ' 428 451 ' 34 3.11% Commercial Uses Commercial (C) General Business (GB) Industrial (IB) Institutional Uses Public Semi -Public (PSP) Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation — Regional/State Private Recreation (PREC) Open Space (OS) Closed Sanitary Landfill (SL) 246 256 334 349 362 380 362 380 409 427: 6067% 92 92 214 375 480 558 507% 25 25 68 68 68 68 172% 271 271 271 271 271 271 0% 93 93 . 93 93 93 2519 2519 2519 2519 2519 93 0% 2519 0% 358 1 358 358 358 358 358 j 0% I 208 208 208 208 I 208 208 I 0% 192 i 192 I 192 192 192 } 192 0% Lakes Weands and axxplairTs 3,3$3 Total City 17,335 To be determined later for cluster/open-space developments. Density in excess of one unit per ten acres will not be allowed within Metropolitan Council's long term sewer service area. 2 This land use require a minimum 50% of the developable property includes a residential component within the density range 3 The Mixed Use -Business (MU -B) land use requires residential units equivalent to the minimum density over the entire developable area. The MU -B "Existing 2008" acreage is based on the approximate area which has been developed consistent with the Objectives of the MU -B land use. Resolution No. 20104# 5 DRAFT DATE 10-12-2010 Planning Commission CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. ### AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTIES TO THE COMMERCIAL -HIGHWAY (CH) AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL -URBAN RESERVE (RR-UR) ZONING DISTRICTS The City Council of the City of Medina ordains as follows: SECTION I The property identified on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and having the following property identification number, on record with Hennepin County, Minnesota, is hereby rezoned to Commercial -Highway (CH): PID# 02-118-23-34-0003 SECTION II The properties identified on Exhibit B, attached hereto, and having the following property identification numbers, on record with Hennepin County, Minnesota, are hereby rezoned to Rural Residential -Urban Reserve (RR-UR): a. PID# 02-118-23-34-0002 b. PID# 02-118-23-33-0003 (that portion north of Meander Road) SECTION III: This ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Medina this day of , 2010. T.M. Crosby, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Chad M. Adams, City Administrator -Clerk Published in the South Crow River News this day of , 2010. Ordinance No. ### 1 DRAFT DATE 10-12-2010 Planning Commission Exhibit A Map identifying property rezoned to the Commercial -Highway (CH) zoning district: Ordinance No. ### DATE A-1 Exhibit B Map identifying properties rezoned to the Rural Residential -Urban Reserve (RR-UR) zoning district: Ordinance No. WI B-1 DATE 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner DATE: October 6, 2010 MEETING: October 12, 2010 Planning Commission AGENDA ITEM: 8 i P/k) lf r, -OtA v l SUBJ: Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Amending the Future Land Use of certain property to the Commercial or Medium Density Residential land use Zoning Map Amendment — An ordinance rezoning certain properties to the Commercial -Highway (CH) or Rural Residential -Urban Reserve (RR-UR) zoning district — Public Hearing Background Last month, the City Council adopted four ordinances which rezoned approxim parcels within the City in order to be consistent with the updated Comprehensive Plan. During these discussions, the owners of three properties discussed their desire for alternative zoning designations from what the City was proposing. After discussing their request, the City Council removed these three properties from the ordinances, and directed staff to process alternative —.__ _ ,HACIfAigRE zoning map amendments MEDINA for these parcels. The subject properties are located northeast of the intersection of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive, as highlighted in the map to the right. The table at the bottom of this page summarizes the proposed changes for the three properties. FIEF Proposed Rezonings Proposed Zoning District CH RR-UR Map Date October 1, 2010 1000 ..000 Map ID# PM x Future Land Use (current) Future Land Use (proposed) Proposed Zoning District 1 02-118-23-33-0003 Mixed Use Mixed Use Rural Residential -Urban Reserve (RR-UR) 2 02-118-23-34-0002 Mixed Use Medium Density Residential Rural Residential- Urban Reserve (RR-UR) 3 02-118-23-34-0003 Mixed Use Commercial Commercial -Highway (CH) Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Page 1 of 3 Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) October 12, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting 000 FeC. rf (' Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment The City is proposing a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to amend the Future Land Use designation of the parcels identified as #2 and #3. When the City adopted the Comp Plan, these parcels were combined into a single 40 -acre parcel. The property was guided Mixed Use in order to allow for a mix of residential and commercial uses across the 40 -acres. After the Comp Plan was approved, the property owners split the parcels through a land division which was exempt from subdivision review. When considering the city-wide rezoning, the Planning Commission and City Council discussed how to zone the two parcels at length. The consensus appeared to be that if the properties would have been two parcels when updating the Comp Plan, that it was likely that the City would not have guided both for Mixed Use. The consensus was also that a Mixed Use zoning designation for both properties was not ideal. As a result, the City Council directed staff to prepare a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for consideration. Staff recommends that parcel #2 be guided for Medium Density Residential (MDR) land use and that parcel #3 be guided for Commercial (C) land use, as shown by the map below. These designations are consistent with surrounding properties, as the parcel to the immediate south is guided Commercial, the property to the northwest is guided Medium Density Residential, and the property to the east is guided Mixed Use. MEDINA Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Proposed Future Land Use - Comxnerctal(C) Medium Density Res. !MDR) -35- 6.99 Wa Map DateOctober 1, 2010 3 000 2ODo 4 000 F4e Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) Page 2 of 3 October 12, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting The property owners of parcel #1 were also part of the Planning Commission and City Council discussions about the city-wide rezoning. Because the property is adjacent to the parcels being proposed to be changed, the City Council directed staff to discuss with the owners if a change of future land use should be proposed for their lot as well. Following consultation, the owners and City staff concurred that the existing Mixed Use designation is preferable. Proposed Rezonino The map on the first page of this report identifies the proposed zoning district for the three properties being discussed. Staff recommends that parcel #3 be rezoned to the Commercial Highway (CH) zoning district. This designation is the same as the property to the immediate south, and would be consistent with the new guiding. During the city-wide rezoning discussion, staff recommended the RR-UR district for properties which have been guided for Mixed Use or sewered residential development, but are currently not served by city services. The Planning Commission and City Council endorsed this recommendation. As such, staff recommends rezoning parcels #1 and #2 to the RR-UR district. Attachments 1. DRAFT resolution approving amendment to Comprehensive Plan 2. DRAFT ordinance rezoning properties Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Page 3 of 3 October 12, 2010 Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) Planning Commission Meeting Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 20104# RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REGARDING THE FUTURE LAND USE OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 55 AND ARROWHEAD DRIVE WHEREAS, the City of Medina proposes to amend its Comprehensive Plan to change the Future Land Use designation of certain properties generally located northeast of the intersection of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is technical in nature, does not substantially change the type of development that is planned to occur in the area, has no practical impact on the City's population forecasts or Traffic Assignment Zone allocations, and is not located within one quarter mile of an adjacent jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the planning commission held a duly called public hearing on October 12, 2010, where testimony was heard from all interested parties and following the hearing recommended approval of the amendment; and WHEREAS, on October 19, 2010, the city council reviewed the amendment, considered the recommendations of the planning commission and heard comments from interested parties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the City of Medina, Minnesota, that the Comprehensive Plan amendment as identified in Exhibit A, attached hereto, is hereby approved. The amendment shall not become effective until approved by the Metropolitan Council and formally adopted by the City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that city staff is authorized to submit the amendment of the Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council for review. Dated: DATE T.M. Crosby, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Chad M. Adams, City Administrator -Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2010-## 1 DRAFT DATE 10-12-2010 Planning Commission Exhibit A Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Proposed Amendment to Map 5-2: change Future Land Use designation of parcels as shown below. Proposed Amendment: Existing: 40.8 gross acre (37.02 net acre) Mixed Use 65 forecasted households (50% of buildable at 3.5-6.99 WA) Proposed. 22.86 gross acre (19 18 net acre) Medium Density Residential 67 forecasted households (3 5-6.99 U/A) 17.94 gross acre (17.84 net acre) Commercial " (I Map 5-2 MEDINA Future Land Use Plan Guide Plan Rseal Res.dent±l - evoculture De.e'opnn-Post _032 Low Density Res: 0 - 315 U,) Medlurr. Density Res 3.5 - 6.993 0.4 - Hgr Density Res 7 - 30 UrA. - Akre Use 3 5 - 7 35 0/3 - M..ed Use - Business 7 . 45 UrA - Comnurual — General Business ® Indusirl. Rumness Pri.ate Recresson iPREC - Parrs 317 Re creak.° - P -R - State or Re9¢na' Open Soars - PUUI.c Ser+-Puldic 0 U1 iose7:annlso-, _an65o 4,351-31-/,a'r .7W 11337 3 rot Wen' Precise Attua Pourearl f soy 1ati and 5 1, to field .e-Ro s Abp U✓Oomd. '0-7-2010 Last A°lended R7oppseC urge' Re.vh A opted llcsen-1e '7 32361 Par cel Os, c.rrer'.as:t 3,,,200': :f7A4 rive 15N r:eC 53 70000 7.27 U.22 Resolution No. 2010 flit 2 DRAFT DATE 10-12-2010 Planning Commission e Proposed Amendment to Table 5-B: delete the stricken text and insert the underlined text as shown below. TABLE 5-B Future Land Use Plan Land Use Deskyudion Gross Area Net Area Ames Percent Acres Percent` Agricultural (AG) Rural Residential (RR) Low Density Residential (LDR) Medium Density Residential (MDR) High Density Residential (HDR) Mixed Use (MU) Mixed Use - Business (MU -B) Developing Post -2030 Commercial (C) General Business (GB) Industrial (IB) Closed Sanitary Landfill (SL) Public Semi -Public (PSP) Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation - Regional or State Private Recreation (PREC) Open Space (OS) Rights -of -Way Lakes Wetlands and Floodplains 108 7,978 944 428 451 0.6% 75 0.4% 45.9% 5,087 29.3% 5.5% 630 1 3.7% 2.6% 288 307 1.7% 15% 12.5% 123 379135 0.7% 103 ; 0.6% 2.2% 1,9% 274 234 ' 1.6% t3% 59 444 40P121 559 68 192 271 93 0.3% 39 0.2% 2.6% 337 1.9% 2.4% 2.5% 29034$ 4 1.514 1 ' 3.2% 0.4% 1.1% 359 1 2.1% 48 0.3% 106 0.6% 1.6% 173 j 1.0% 0.5% 46 0.3% 2,519 358 208 912 1,283 14.5% 1,528 8.8% 2.1 % 272 1.6% 1.2% 153 0.9% 5.1% 912 + 5.1% 7.4% 1,283 7.4% r 5,335 ; 30.8% Total City 17,335 17,335 Resolution No. 2010 /tit 3 DRAFT DATE 10-12-2010 Planning Commission r Proposed Amendment to Table 5-C: delete the strielitm text and insert the underlined text as shown below. TABLE 5-C Net Residential Density (Assuming Lowest of Density Range) Land Use , # of Units Gross Acres Acres Undevelopable' Net Acres Commercial Net Acres Residential Net Density (Units/Acre) A B C D E=B- (C+D) AIE Existing LDR 486 346 55 291 1.7 Existing MDR 497 181 17 164 3.0 Existing HDR 140 17 2 15 9.3 Future LDR 678 598 259 339 2.0 Future MDR 434 501 247 27C 123 126 1-2414.3 3.5 Future HDR 616 106 18 88 7.0 Future MU2 /173 408 379 338 109105 135 Th 135 11 E2 3.5 Future MU -B3 273 59 20 393 7.0 TOTAL x,.1599 1<-933-1,915 603602 1 in 1496-1.197 3.01 1 Acres Undevelopable indude wetlands, floodplains, and steep slope 2 The Mixed Use (MU) land use requires residential units equivalent o the minimum density over at least half of the deve opable area 3 The Mixed Use -Business (MU -B) land use equires residential units equivalent to the minimum density over the entire developable area Proposed Amendment to Table 5-D: delete the stricken text and insert the underlined text as shown below. TABLE 5-D Net Residential Density (Assuming Middle of Density Range) Land Use # of Units Gross Acres Acres Undevelopable1 Net Acres Commercial Net Acres Residential Net Density (Units/Acre) A B C D E = B (C+D) A/ E Existing LDR 486 346 55 291 1.7 Existing MDR 497 181 17 164 3.0 Existing HDR 140 17 2 15 9.3 Future LDR 915 598 259 339 2.7 Future MDR 62G 7i 247 270 123 122 1-24 143 5.0 Future HDR 880 106 18 88 10.0 Future MU2 675 580 3-78 338 409105 135116 135 1162 5.0 Future MU -B3 390 59 20 393 10.0 TOTAL 4,603 1,833 1E5 603 §§2 136', I 1,196 Ian 3.85 1 Acres Undevelopable indude wetlands, floodplains, and steep slope 2 The Mixed Use (MU) land use requires esidential units equivalent to the minimum density over at least half of the developable area 3 The Mixed Use -Business (MU -B) land use requires residential units equivalent to the minimum density over the entire developable area Resolution No. 2010-## DATE 4 DRAFT 10-12-2010 Planning Commission Proposed Amendment to Table 5-F: delete the strielien text and insert the underlined text as shown below. Table 5-F Land Use in 5 -Year Increments 5 Residential Uses -Rural Residential 2.5 acres or less -Rural Residential 2.5 -10 acres 1U/10A -Rural Residential 10-40 acres acres) ( (acres) J (acres) I (acres) 212 212 212 TBD1 1 U/10A 2197 2207 2217 1U/40A 3591 3661 3691 1977. i 1897 1857 1 109 I 109 1 109 i 8086 7 8086 ; 8086 I 8086 - Rural Residential 40+ acres -Agricultural 40+ acres 1U/40A 11U/40A Subtotal Unsewered Low Density Residential (LDR) 2 3.49 346 600 713 Medium Density Residential (MDR) High Density Residential (HDR) 7 30 17 21 21 21 Mixed Use (MU)2 3.5 € 6.9 0 80 207166 207 166 Mixed Use — Business (MU -B)3 7 45 5 59 59 59 Future Developing Areas 1 U/10A 2501 1954 1372 982 Commercial Uses 3.5 6.9 181 ' 326 428 451 ' 428 451 Commercial (C) General Business (GB) Industrial (IB) Institutional Uses Public Semi -Public (PSP) Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation — Regional/State Private Recreation (PREC) Open Space (OS) Closed Sanitary Landfill (SL) (acres) J (acres) 212 ......._...212............ 0% _ 2227 2237 1.8% 3721 3751 4.5% 1817 i 1777 -10.1% 109 L 109 I 0% 8086 8086 0% 911 944 944 57% 428 451 ' 428 451 34 38% 21 123 486% 280 239: 37$ 338 374 323% 59 59 0% 771 444 -77% 246 256 334 349 362 380 . 362 380 408 427 60 6Z% 92 92 214 375 480 558 507% 25 25 68 68 68 68 172% 271 93 2519 2519 271 93 2519 358 358 358 ( 208 208 L 208 192 192 192 271 271 93 93 2519 2519 358 358 208 208 192 192 271 . ......._.. 93 ....... ... 2519 358 208 192 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% ►2 takes t Wel/ands and Floodplains 5,335 TotalCity 17,335 1 To be determined later for cluster/open-space developments. Density in excess of one unit per ten acres will not be allowed within Metropolitan Council's long term sewer service area. 2 This land use require a minimum 50% of the developable property includes a residential component within the density range 3 The Mixed Use -Business (MU -B) land use requires residential units equivalent to the minimum density over the entire developable area. The MU -B "Existing 2008" acreage is based on the approximate area which has been developed consistent with the Objectives of the MU -B land use. Resolution No. 2010-## DATE 5 DRAFT 10-12-2010 Planning Commission CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. ### AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTIES TO THE COMMERCIAL -HIGHWAY (CH) AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL -URBAN RESERVE (RR-UR) ZONING DISTRICTS The City Council of the City of Medina ordains as follows: SECTION I The property identified on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and having the following property identification number, on record with Hennepin County, Minnesota, is hereby rezoned to Commercial -Highway (CH): PID# 02-118-23-34-0003 SECTION II The properties identified on Exhibit B, attached hereto, and having the following property identification numbers, on record with Hennepin County, Minnesota, are hereby rezoned to Rural Residential -Urban Reserve (RR-UR): a. PID# 02-118-23-34-0002 b. PID# 02-118-23-33-0003 (that portion north of Meander Road) SECTION III: This ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Medina this day of , 2010. T.M. Crosby, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Chad M. Adams, City Administrator -Clerk Published in the South Crow River News this day of , 2010. Ordinance No. 1 ## 1 DRAFT DATE 10-12-2010 Planning Commission Exhibit A Map identifying property rezoned to the Commercial -Highway (CH) zoning district: Ordinance No. ### DATE A-1 Exhibit B Map identifying properties rezoned to the Rural Residential -Urban Reserve (RR-UR) zoning district: Ordinance No. #tt# B-1 DATE 5irr PLAN ( i 71 rtl 7-7 r'l C7 C7 r .4 ; ELM CREEK DRIVE 0 -J - -I C_ 7-7 (E) 0 TI 0 C- �i J NAVAJO ROAD --------- 1 ME D I NA Mimi ut Ns - u' a 'r rye la i u r "1. ■. r Pfr ` !::!:.t.: uu 1ee. I u Nu w' el 49 941:'i, \t ' � . 1 1 OEpe W AREA 2 LENNAR LENNAR CORPORATION 935 East Wayzata Boulevard Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Pl C 4 -- DTI Land Development Manager: Carole Toohey: 952-249-3012 S`aLRj4 = SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 26) N 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-8000 0F C= -U 5> rl C7 )> 0 (1) NAVAJO ROAD -U 5> P1 C7 NORTH 1" = 130' REVISIONS BY\ PREPARE PRELIMMARY PLANS >RH 09-15-10 Proposed Zoning-R1 Min Width -90ft Min Area - 11,(X10 sf Fysb -30ft Sysb-25 ft Total - 10 ft Min Rysb - 30 ft 50' Row - 28' B -B Streets Proposed Zoning -R2 Min Width -60ft Min Area - 8,000 sf Fysb - 30 ft Sysb- 15 ft Total -5ft Min Rysb-25ft 50' Row - 28' B -B Streets Proposed Zoning - R3 Min Area - 8,750 sf Fysb - 25 ft Private Street Fysb - 40 ft from Roadway Sysb -30 ft between Bk1s Rysb - 20/40 ft 24' B -B Private Streets 50' Row - 28' B -B Streets CLIENT/DEVELOPER LENNAR CORPORATION 935 East Wayzata Boulevard Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Attn: Carole Toohey T-952-249-3012 LAND SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER SATHRE-BERGQUIST INC. 150 S. Broadway Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 Attn: Bob Molstad -Engineer Attn: David Pemberton - Land Surveyor T-952-476-6000 F-952-476-0104 SHEET INDEX TABLE SHEET Description SP Preliminary Site Plan PH Preliminary Phasing Plan AERIAL Aerial Map (11011 ow) WB Wetland Buffer Averaging Plan (11x11 OW EX Existing Conditions Plan Alta Afte/Boundery Survey PP Preliminary Plat UP Preliminary Utility Plan GP Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan EC Preliminary Erosion Control Plan TS Tree Survey 8 Removal Plan TR Tree Replacement Plan BF Buffer Yard Plan W `Pryec6W01-637 ENCLAVE PRELIMINARY ea'xeaOSE-PRELMOWG T T I Pt1A//)VS PJtA)V T 1 C L AV MEDINA E ?�Eas W LENNAR LENNAR CORPORATION Land Development Manager. Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 s,,,4� . SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. t1�1 ;fit ONDC o 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 ® L --=._-_-= - ♦ row @' ` PHASE 1: '1 '_ FONDAe\ ♦ t •iii �ri ■ - j� Lam,' r �'i ii il L ; '` �� •v3 r7 ���� Areas: ""' C N� _. ■� Gross 10.0 0 " ' ,IN r 'Ill �:1N AM NN •� ac 1■ a • ■u■ PHASE 5: Wetland 0.92 ac Wet Buffer 0.72 ac s ,,•• �� , ♦�,P. .n .y °__ °1 IN . lu 1■ •I1 ■■ ■1 IT ,� - I•, �.HI \E 1� !7 ■l ., 3 e -,_ L j Areas: Gross 11.49 ac Net 8.36 ac • �� ► jet 2 �. ������'� Wetland 2.62 ac I•i `' tita�r1/ `- �� 1.28 25 - 65' Single -Family Lots a -- .�u , o Eod�5 l �� • 0,) Wet Butter ac Net 7.59 ac yr �.. , ,�' ���� � � SII ♦ NIUE ' I I I 110 111 IL ' I IN 11' ,,&' �rr ;. ¢ drop �1 41 -Multi-Famil Lots :Y PHASE 2 OVERALL AREA: , ,/• MI VI an MI ! 1� ♦:R� rp1I dll%II � �� 11 I ��� ll "VOW I if�„ le MI --•� ♦ . ,\ •i i ®� , • • fiYA Y eai �1 • ,I 11. il• ��`• :1 j , 'mss 4 4.0 `4 .,1 / .y - - -- Areas: Gross 13.21 ac Wetland 0.07 ac l 1 . 3 1. 1111I • I II I El ' `'. " � • 1 •i,, ' vi /. ' IliI i' ..----- " 1 I a , `"- Wet. Buffer 0.39 ac y °'s a/SI y� �r I ! Net 12.75 ac I 26 - 65' Single Family Lots 17 - 75' Single Family Lots t=\ 2 . ‘1 ,^, � * r """� `® ,1 ice- f�, 1'// � 1 =-.� ate+ " ,,,• ;��.� c : ■•'P\ �i •� J ,+ ,_ �� L, �,1 1 \ �,,,. 1 ' 43 Total Single Family Lots , I ` ' "� �/ % "' I♦ �► / 1.� 'AREA 1 - i - �, -- == I � / 1 �` \. �� _ -__ AREA 2 AREA 2 ��ll 1 i4iiii• •4 / \� 44 ��" / i ou ' i11 +1� ���;�`•. it AO VI PHASE 3: I. I' t� 2 _ 4�I\ 1111 1� �Ir01 !� 1 A sr "� � �il M 4 1g t �.."t:u'6•,, Areas: Gross 1 16.03 ac Wetland 4.40 ac , I' ^ d . • 1 11 1,, ld�l / /d; r ',� u s - x (�I f►_ �Ip lk* 1 Wet. Buffer I 2.59 ac 11 m g�•:. N W' / l ' _ t �,1 f►� `'' Net 9.04 ac � �Ir1 1 �� l \a` llliter ri 05 - 65' Single Family Lots 1 1 IIN - • �II�, r *i„ �• 11 - 75' Single Family Lots ; _ '„� I ff (. 'r ,. I //' 04 - 90' Single Family Lots I �'1 • '- ___ t� 20 - Total Single Family Lots i I, ��l \ / �;3 t tag _ • Me gg g II h, ��� ;� t „ / I i .!'"` ' % CONSERVATION AREA OVERALL: I 1 I ( @ --+---_ 1� u��.I,1�%� I i � %��t , -__•J e r �. �"µ°t // r 1�` ° ►j � [p� ` ,, ;.r\' tl Il�ili _J1�___ 1� /r,. j a( -e t / ,. �, . :j ..= Areas: Gross 11.29 ac Wetland 1.43 ac Wet Buffer 2.43 ac II r=--- i 1 ---- 1� •� � IC; 1� C /' Net 7.43 ac r �\ 1��"tit� 1.y .N! 1 r�111 A It •\•�1 • • I. PHASE 4 OVERALL AREA: I r _,,___ ilia z / `` Areas: Gross 11.56 ac Al I 1 r� 'I►1 d D // iPONND\ :'.�+ �`�� `� ��� / ,w+`•°=.'d.7t •(� _��.,4f/ Wetland 0.00 ac - II 1/1,1 ' 9 ;r✓ Wet. Buffer 0.04 ac ---- '' ��//j AO1 `•w y Net 11.52 ac 17 - 75' Single Family Lots 1 9 Y 10 - 90' Single Family Lots 1 a--------` i� 'r II 1' I� ~�1 - 'I �,4l // f _' � A _-" � or `` � or i �. �j. 27 -Total Single Family Lots } \\ 6 �44* ►�� • �I+ �� I 1, 6 `•� I • 1 ice, `' ,+� I 6 I .64111111111" - \. SOUTH AREA: . i' ( DIa • .. Areas: Gross 35.46 ac Ili V Wetland 23.14 ac *--, Wet. Buffer 3.25 ac I • Net 9.07 ac 1 _J ------__ '� , ;I G .� NORTH 1" = % @ 221(34 120' REVISIONS BY N� �4 PREPARE PHASING PLAN NRM 09-15-10 ,f Vn \` W \ Projects W01-634 ENCAVE PRELIMINARY#2tdwg\ENCLAVE2_PHASING_ PLAN. DWG r r Q NlLN:111 EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHO WN IN AN APPRO XIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERM INE THE EXACT LOCATIO N OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAG ES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LO CATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. PDV tlIi AA NARY 13 fI AMA., ] s` 7 Lu re N w a WETLAND BUFFER AVERAGING CALC: ME BUFFER IMPACT: 175 + 650 + 1,200 + 265 + 770 + 705 = 3,765 SQ FT. BUFFER CR EATION: 520 + 895 + 1,045 + 1,170 + 1,010 = 4,640 SQ FT. NO TE: WETLAND BUFFER AVERAGING WAS CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE TO SECTION 828.43 Subd . 5. (a) of the Medin a City Code ut� 13AIUQ E3.LNII H 3- 80 40 0 40 80 180 SCALE IN FEET 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATI ON WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TH AT 1 AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER T HE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA S, /%rL'' DATE 0 J I S/ I O REG. NO 1-0-11-2 REVISIONS BY' PR EPARE PR ELIMINAR Y PLAN S NRN 09-15-10 r Z a 0 W m W 2 1 - Lo 0 cc co J WETLAND BUFFER AVERAGING PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . e DRAWN NRH CHECKED RSM DATE 04/15/10 SCALE AS SHOWN J OB NO 5401-637 FILE BASE-PRELI M.DWG SHEET WB OF SHEETS,/ 0 REVISIONS BY1 Revis ed Wetland U an d Added We tla nd 15 JML 05-27-10 N ORTH J 1 111 J —srll IT, 111 ! 1111 111 N!I a!i , r J L 411 rt' LUTZ ELM CREEK ADDN. EXISTING U TILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPRO XIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE FoA rT LO CA TIO N OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COM MENCING WORK HE A GREES TO BE FULLY RESPO NSIBLE FO R ANY AND ALL DAMAG ES A RISING OU T OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCA TE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. LEGION PARK4 S€C^„J HUNTER 4 7 AG 1 1,11 1111 10; • IJ NPLATTED ADDITION r. • 1,11 l ti11 i.# 11tt 1 NA'A' J HllLL ' t 1 ' ADDI1P: tL JY� i nl.: 1'Ir 144 UNP'LAIITED -`-� c0-1 T_r-r NPL .TTED e 1, ii TT T -r - i-r1-, ri 111 REGINA ESTATES TUCKBOROUGH n r-r-T--r1- I� 4 1i1 FARMS 0 W ,kS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3 /. DATE O f / (/J REG . NO1-41-n-8 U Z H (1) 5 a LL w 'Q VJ EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP e. DRAWN 1 NRH CHECKED RS M DATE 04-11-10 SCALE AS SHOWN J OB NO. 5401-634 FILE: MEDINA TOPOoEX .DWG SHEET EX COND l OF SHEET! 1 f In iv1I_L. DETNL -1 — _ �c ' I 4250 PARK I nn --S1° 21'39"W 931.94-- •77 77-... E LINE OF Or IJ 4✓Gvn»s 12' a GiNE m• et h r4 a' J —J R `.,,„„,..m, / rM 5 c oRroiR a ,.01 74'p,190;) b ; LO -/ -�1 c N /' ‘1 / ''... . \ un udE. .440 M N' ` " 501°29'39,11.9 97 \ `"".. ... 8 pi ! A�/ - -- J1a ,e \-1 e i 86. 797 \ _ -.. • ( .,, ,-�� J. I iI i; • -----1 3 V Y 1 ,1 I O WS W MY WeMR =OM aot00401I 1 1 � ALIDCunE a LOr IJ Or I— LW' S 5221E,211 Aq — L— -'33. 00 ——" - �I I -* - `-. 33, 40 _- 1' 1 SO°51'21"W 1341. 87 1 P 1 rvi NOR TH 150 75 0 75 150 300 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND CB TB CHH CONC EB GYW HYD OHU SMH UP TNH WET A-1 • 0 D enote s Catch Basin D enote s Tele/Comm. Box/Ped D enotes Co mmu nica tion Haad)tole Denotes Con crete Surface Den otes Electric Box Denotes Guy Wire Den otes Fire Hydran t D enotes Overhead Utility Lin e Deno tes Sanitary Manhole Deno tes U tility Pole Denotes Top Nut of Hydran t Den otes Wetland Delineation/flag Identifier D en otes Ex istin g Con to ur Denotes Foun d Mo numen t - As Den oted Dentoes Foun d Cast - Iron - Monu ment Den otes I/2" by 14" Iro n Pipe Set and Marked by License No . 40344 NO SCALE DETAIL SEE ABOVE 00 6 4' .C2 1a 4 c.:2 d -c0 00 241-. - 4,25 0 sle , eF+tN J 40N'4 4. VA R A il. .07 i4 4770 3* w1 247 91.29'39'w 931.9 N3TE2"L ot - ?co , ,J 470 73* Ail . 247 -J I —EAE 4945 24 *3 1 sca r /4 410. 4. AID 247 I w FARMS —1-- A rA 7, 1330.45 N OTES This survey does no t purport to show all un dergrou nd u tilities. The existing utilities shown are shown in an approximate wa y only. The con tra ctor shall determine the ex act lo catio n of any an d all existing u tilities befo re co mmen cing work. The contractor shall be fu lly responsible for an y an d all da mages arisin g our of his failure to exactly locate and protect all existing utility facilities. Contact GOPH ER STATE ONE CA LL at 651-054-0002 for precise onsite location of u tilities prior to an y excavation . No rth A merican Title Company as agent for Fist A merican title Insurance Compan y Commitmen t for Title In suran ce File No . 40852-09-04313, cffecrive date September 23, 2009, was relied upon as to matters of reco rd. The subject property appears to lie within Zones X an d A, (Areas ou tside to 1 -percen t annul chan ce flo odplain, areas of 1% ann ual c hance sheet flow floo din g whe re a venge depths are less than 1 fad, areas of 1%am al chance steam floodin g where the con tributing draina ge area is less than 1 square mile, or areas protec ted fro m the l% ann ua l chance flo od by levees. No B ase Floo d Elevations or depths are shown within this acne. Insuran ce purchase is n ot re quired in these zones. AND Areas withal% a nn ual chance of flooding ands 26% cheoee of flooding o ver the life ofa 30 -year mortgage. Becau se deta iled analyses ar e not perfo rmed for su ch areas; no depths or base flood elevetiom are shown within these zones.) , per the Nationa l Flood Insuran ce Pro gra m, Flood Insu ran ce Ra te Map Commun ity Panel No. 27053C0166E, 27053C0167E, 27053C0168E, 27053C0169, dated September 2, 2004 es acquired fro m the Federal Emergen cy Management Agency Web Site. A reas: Parcel 1 - Parcel 2 - Parcel 3 - 3,403,500 Sq. Ft. - 78.134 Acres Net 87,810 So. Ft. - 2. 016 A cres Right of Wav 3,491,310 Sq. Ft - 80. 150 A cres Gross 1,224,964 Sq. Ft - 28.121 Ames N et 33, 457 Sq. Ft. . 0.768 Ames Right of Way 1,258,421 Sq. Ft. - 28.889 Ames Gross 201,034 Sq. Ft. - 4.615 A mes Net 10, 828 SQ. Ft. - 0.249 A mes Right of Way 211,862 Sq. Ft - 4.864 Acres Gross Current Zoning: P.U.D. 2 Per the City of Medina website. Survey coordinate and bearing basis : Henn epin County Wetland(s) shown hereon is (are) per field location of stakes as set by Svobod a Ec ol ogical R esourc es, Au gust 7, 2006. 010"A I/ A I vn V r/'0v / 1 1 I fIIL.L. S 1 5/5/01/ IvAr N1°21'474 W 658.HZ- ( E LM E" ...rot 7/2 a h'E 7/4 a SEC 7. 1 194 774 EVE 13 l 959" E+077rc 2660. 98 EX ISTIN G HARDCOVER CALCUL ATIO NS Buildings: Bitu mino us: Grovel: Total: 11,827 sq. ft. 52,896 sq . ft 40,692 sq . R 105,415 sq . ft. - 0.272 acres - 1.214 acres - 0 .934 acres - 2.420 acres 1329. 33 it I AF a 44 7 /2 .a .v2` /4 -- �n z1 m. n4 Res" 1J I;DI rr . : l'l Ir L -LJ 0) `c k a M "0, Ki W W : n 01 to CD '' Z 01, _. .._1330.45 -_te r. - -_. --- -- L 1330.49 1aI--- _ P r---- T 1 I Gross Area: 4,961,593 sq. ft . - 113 .90 acres/2 .420 acres = 2.12% ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PARCELS Parcel 1 & 3: Unassigned Parcel 2: 3212 Hu nter Drive, Medina, Mi nnesot a, 55340 \ 1 \1 \1 DESCRIPTIO N OF SUBJE CT PROPERTY PA RCEL l - PI D # 12-118-23-43-0002 1> Ix Lot 13, AU DITORS SUB DIVISIO N NO. 241, EXCEPT that part of Lot 13, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 241, Hen nepin County, Min nesota described as follows: Begi nning at the S outheast coma of L ot 14 of said AUDITO R'S S UB DI VISION NO. 241; thence s outh alo ng the m ost east erly line of said Lot 13 distant 2 .3 fe et; thenc e We st parallel with the North lin e of said Lot 13 distant 656.35 feet; th ence North parallel with the w est line of said Lot 84 dista nt 414.80 feet to the most northerly line of said Lot 13; thence e ast along said northerly line 524 .35 to the west li ne of said Lot 14; the nce so uth along said west li ne 412.50 feet to the s outhwest comer of said L ot 14; the nce east along the south line of said Lot 14 to the point of beginning. A nd ALSO EXCEPT that part of Lot 13, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 241, Hennepin Cou nty , Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the n orth line of Lot 13, distant 524.35 feet west from the point of intersectio n of said north line with the west line of Lot 14 as measured along said north line; thence south parallel with the west line of Lot 14, a dista nce of 328.18 feet; the nce west parallel with the north line of L ot 13, a distance of 663.65 feet, more or less, to a point on the west li ne of Lot 13; thence north alo ng the we st line of said L ot 13, a distance of 328 .18 feet to the n orthwest comer of L ot 13; th enc e east along the north line of Lot 13 to the point of begin ning . PARCEL 2- PM # 13-118-23-12-0001 The West Half of the Northeast Q uarter, Section 13, Township 118, Range 23, acc ording to the Go vernme nt Sur vey th ereof, Hennepin Cou nty, Min nesota P ARCEL 3 - PI D # 12-118-23-43-0002 That part of Lot 13, AU DITORS SUB DIVISI ON NO. 241, He nnepin Cou nty, Mi nnesota described as follows: Comm encing at a p oint on the N orth line of L ot 13, dist ant 524 .35 feet West fr om the poi nt of intmsection of s aid North li ne with the West line of L ot 14 as measured along said North line, the nce S outh, parallel with the West Line of Lot 14 a distance of 328 .18 feet; thence West parallel with the North line of Lot 13 a distance of 663 .65 feet , more or less , to a point on the West line of said Lot 13; thence North al ong the West line of said Lot 13 , a distance of 328 .18 feet to the Northwest comer of Lot 13, thence East along the North line of Lot 13 to the point of beginning . This is to certify that this map or plat a nd the survey on which it is based were made in acc ordance with the "Mi nimum Standard Detail R equir eme nts f or ALT A/ACSM L and Title S ur veys," j ointly est ablished and adopted by ALTA and NSPS in 2005, and incl udes Items of Table A there of Pursuant to the Accuracy Sta nd ards as adopt ed by ALTA and NSPS and in eff ect on the date of this certificatio n, undersig ned further certifi es th at in my professi onal opinion, as a land su rvey or registered in the State of Minnesota, the Relati ve P ositional Acctaocy of this s urvey does not exceed that which is specified therei n. DatttteeeerQQQ 2nd des f April, 2010. David B. Pemberton, Professional Land Su rvey or Min nesota Lice nse No. 40344 REVISIONS O RIGINAL FIELD WO RK COMPLETED 10/22/2009 DBP REV. - ALTA SURVEY 04/02/2010 DBP REV. - UPDATE ALTA REW. 09/17/2010 DBP 0, Z U) 5 0 m C/) ALTA/ACS M LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED FOR >- Q 2 Z z0 a• v 200 O Z U Ce I=01 -z W Z< (1 W (11- - : a ZQ U �E W re O < Z Q DRAWN DBP CHECKED DBP DATE 4/01/2010 SCALE AS SH OWN JOB NO. 5401-834 FILE: ALTA SU RVEY.DWG TOWNSHIP - RANGE - SECTION 118-23-13 HENNEPIN COUNTY BO OK 165 PAGE:XX •Certification applies to all sheets 1 SHEET 1 OF 4 REVISIONS 1 N OR TH 100 50 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET --- / / e / /11 C) 0 1 n� L_ I I 1 I I I 1 E DE' : LJ JRIERS FIRST Tr' Tr11 % lv .11 S89° 51'41"W 647. 46 l` 0 0 NET 1-1`' NEr,-e YETYa NEi 7 .E -si EDGE OF ° *f t 1-11 I 1 9 E4 ,,-12 \ '.41,,, '�' \ �\ N69i51'41"E 643.95 I 4•I \ \ \ V A \ Wi "'1� _\�\ -Ili 7 `Y f 1, . E. \ \ I \ \ \\ <-' - 1 V A V A V ME M.^ e nErr'-i V ' l \ 4, OCT 2_A� \ V A\ V A \ V �� N\V \ 1 r 2-,\ \\ \\ \ \ \ II ET E0i e.1 maE " \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ '*m*,, \ V A v 1 1 / / / 12/ // 2-2 // // / / / / / `°' °, /' / 1 I Er 2-7 / I I I °j' I I , I I \ / 1 I \ / I I I � � / / N O 0 fV OD GJ NET 21,04 • ,ET ,. co 1 /\ -r 1 - L. V 1 1 / 1 L. l! 1 N89° 51'41"E\656.35 AE' ,-9 E L$ CREEK DR li I. 1.4 L NET1 ME 4-21 / / / I \ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ �9 Y� 3 \ 1v V ' / �\ V A \ V A/ (�, _ v 1 rif• III t ) I--- d IOso/fir l— I I I I � / 00'15'7 NET n -n M ET 11-10-t0 ;I f r ay.� I IC ' O .99' / s 2 0 s v KT /0 �3 ORT 4.726 NET 4-2i I0 I I / / 1 / N ET 4- 817 h NEi ke 'E' 4-2° VE T 0. 4 M Er ,-aM Wa r ---\ /.ET,.]4 / Ki r6^ 1 cnxl »rte o \ I / ' i I / M[i ,^ I1 _ / / NO A I \ / rr }.J a en44p r / O To 4. �A[tN 4 E° ` . \ — MET ,4� . fn 7 :IV 2-2 'ET I NEi S (O 1 A ET hi Z /1 ; °� ° /F., \ .. ' EWE of /1 9i MET 12 4 ELL - CY e x J - ..,..- v, -w,.1 �. �, .( �� \ ww,- �r. ENE; ]-.M 'rlO '% '0 ,/r "MN TREES _-1\ NEkr *r L,2 -2 , ME T 4-b I � ," < �\ `=/I • / \ \ t i II F. 1 / 1 i/ 1 N K (A E CrR 7MO4-2 \ -- / ScmCr Lora or � or 7; TN /74 rAuorna Y'.n .+1a MO 241 N89°55'48"W 1255.92\• 8}AiC-HLI NE 1 i (SEE SHEET 3 OF -4. -SHEETS) MATCHLIE / 2 SHEET 2 OF 4i SHEETS)\�' \ ( J 1 REV. - ALTA SURVEY 04/02/2010 DBP REV. - UPDATE ALTA REW. 09/17/2010 DBP r ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED FOR >- Z Z2 Q O aU 2W U UOZ J� OUIZ W ZU1— W Q 2 ZQ < 0 �• w �W O < ZQ a' LL r DRAWN DBP C HECKED DBP DATE 4/01/2010 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO. 5401-634 FILE, ALTA SURVEY.DW G TOWNSHIP - RANGE - SECTION 118-23-13 BOOK 165 PAGE.XX l SHEET 2 OF 4 REVISIONS N OR TH 100 50 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET / / / / / / vc Cj gin 414 7 tl �i 1. li-1'I I 6 . v i 1 I ,0 // 0 / , o i I N$ p, ; 4t me- P� woe 71/4 \ / S L/1E O� JJ cr 4 ^j �'` ter 7.5 OA A19E EI / �ALa/LgS ma DO . \ \ \ `\ ' "—\N890 55'48'W 1255. 92\\_ y11lAJ -HLiNE -f- 1 1 4 (SEE SHEET 3 OF -4 EETS) 'v v I /) 1 t I_ "-\-1- MAT CHL I/NE / V I III / Q� �1 / i m ma o PE n.-:0 SEE SHEET 2 OF 4(SHEETS) T � y} N 1 / _? / I c.4 \ / \ ?1t I/ / rEi n-9� 1 ✓" '' / / PET % I / I I 11 \ --/ / / I WEi n -is >> t _, _ 1 vE/ r x/ �* 19ET \ I _ .. rEr n6 OA / rcipsta ` �, ry / / )75 / p En2if o� ) Atr s -1 �'. P.,-s I 1 \ ' PET n _\ )' s`"7 / \ \ \ /,l/ 4 W ET n -s V \1 11 ��Y 1�` �. er n -4 1 / I / I ME`It 16 .54 EDGE OF —/ ME7LMD MET 3 8'. YET 13 9' 1E! 'u� 7 .. .f \ \ ,._ • ,MET ,.,,t,0 I MET 1}-5 •\.,,,. M (/ho: Y} 3 PE7/:- " rr sae 1E1 ,+_2 PET .11 - .ET *3 11- 40 WET 11-39/ 43 12. 7 O 1 Z / WET ,1 -36 WE1 11- 12 PET 1. 10 .2 r * ,M 41141 19E131 �o 19717',. I*, /3-21 rE' T } ,. 1J ,r . 24 11t9 / / / / — / 1-117 /-; / t - / : > /1 II 1 -r= WEI 2- PET 11..23\ *1 11-24 4E1 11 -25 WET 11- / / $R 1 \ 581' 1� I MER ANG9 \ 1 mOF rts\ tooret 48' 49- 285.11 / "r - 10 PET 14-6 ). YET T } YET 1,4 PET 14-3 is ( NET 6-1 .12 \ Et* 0--11 /' e-e/V� se e ar PET 7-5 r=^� 6 ,W O' PE T7' 7L_`\Te-3 NEi o-2 71. PE 6-1 s1 ME T YET 7- PET 0.14 - YET o s1 T % ♦ MR 91 YET .0 Lo 7-9\ 1E7 SP., o- u EET 6.7/ - '/ PET .12 / EE 11 PET b -ate 19 10 KT 6 70 WET b-4' FN / NET 7-2 MEr 7-1 7-10 7-10 YET 14-055 14 =T WN , 69 Nse 1 YE 143.14 _�mo8/ /A 9 MEi t4 -00 }5914s 875' 5155.E '492 77.7"-14-714 7 T3 W 1414-14 �re M ATCHLI NE �► 4,,4„0- _-Q4-10t (SEE SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS) \ •4 � • M ATCH.LI NE ). .� .� • .� ` (SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS) LJ S nJ :5 1 I PAN INS -7- -7 0 _. dIP 1 IS �— — *rou1N X/s ROADWAY YET 1 -4-4- �+iB 4.64 0 7 c r14_� PET 4-81 ;WET 14- .61 / REV. - ALTA SURVEY 04/02/2010 DBP REV. - UPDATE ALTA RE W. 09/17/2010 DBP 1 ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY PREP ARED F OR >- Z Z <0 4/w U OZ CL LU Ce O b. Z Z I.LI ZU� a ZQ <0N IAA �w O< Z Q 1- �NN LL 1 DRAWN DBP CHECKED DBP DATE 4/01/2010 SCALE AS SH OWN J OB N O. 5401-634 FILE: ALTA SURVEY.DWG TOWNSHIP - RANGE - SECTION 118-23-13 BOOK:165 PAGE:XX 2' SHEET 3 OF 4 r LEG END REVISIO NS N OR TH 100 50 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET \ \ \ 7 7 7 \ \ \ \ / \ / / \ / CB Deno tes Catch Basin TB Deno tes Tele/Co mm. Box/Ped CHH D eno tes Commun ication Han dhole CONC Den otes Con crete Surface EB Den otes Electric Box GYW Deno tes Guy Wire HYD D en ote s Fire H ydran t OHU Denotes Overhea d Utility Line SMH Denotes San itary Manhole UP Denotes Utility Pole TNH Denotes Top Nu t of H ydran t WET A-1 Denotes Wetlan d D elin eation/Fla g Identifier D enotes Existing Conto ur • Denotes Foun d Monumen t - As D en oted Q Den toes Foun d Ca st - Iron - Monu ment Q Den otes 12" by 14" Iron Pipe Set an d Modred by Licen se No. 40344 J \� 1 tk41,9 , . • ;—?. e1% # 71.72,40 1 1• i�/ lax% .E1 SP Er Iw VT 14-e u z 133-112) • t� coy"- p .EI lrlp I v •• 4E r u.2 - - - - ET Ir13 - - 0 MATCHLINE 1.IE4-4TDi_/e• (SEE SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS) \ ,46 005i 05 - . r* 4-N 4-x �-- MATCH, LINE —� +4-r" "' (SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS) - • E, 14m -/.E. w 21 .- . . '1 +Er uaa • ens o• 11-24 14-24 OCT 14.1E J I e K14-:72 mW IE I 14 16 v�. . ea Ic, , r I or, Il M • p r� ti E 1,4-27 611E OF I lR MD' .)11, 4. . /5 Kr ,4-14 4,14E1 il,,,:..1-4, „II-- ''',,,, ,,,__ / Or. .E1 It.. 1u . -. �� . 14 5-"i 07' MA 2 K1 WU 1450 �nET 14-51 r �� '\ 668 � '(‘" 'P.— ' 4- . KT 4-31 687°35'47" E 339. 90 NERMD .d 6 OWE of ow 12 t'E"" ^O 1E. 14-29' - ',Er I4-36�/.. J Oft 14-36 I I mgr OF / / / 7 IA . . . . . Nf1 14-6 f 9 _a AQ 14A .e ,ref f �, \t52 WEE Cr \rOg\1147 :4-v -99,1,67 \.c. IrSt / Jg °j'e .E1 149\ ar7 1 4-15\ .ET ,tea mfg A` I - - -_ .Er 1ti\ N89 °58'19'8 .. \ 37x4- a Il,k,\_ 1 4 E1 T1,43 E E i 1a -sr I. ...� . ., .�-.-.r- 1":".' utl lreo ..• . v4- .. 11 1E 4 r a 4-n I _ i 1303.69 ¢., 1 • • ; 4 so I wEr 14.11 • o uE er OF NE V4 OF y r N89 56'19'8 1336. 69 rt— s 1 �14 ]JP 114 ROE PJ r , l 1EI 1412 v ` 1 0 A \ r I A 1::)1 ATrr-n \VI Vr LJ-1 1 1 L LJ REV.- ALTA SURVEY 04/02/2010 DBP REV.- UPDATE ALTA REW. 09/17/2010 DBP DE S ALTA/ACS M LAND TITLE SUR VEY PREPARED FOR zp < • 0 g w O U UZ ct O Z • w ZU1— w• '~ J 2 < < 0 �w � w O < Z Q H U u- DR AWN DBP CHECKED DBP DATE 4/01/2010 SC ALE AS SH OWN JOB NO. 5401-834 FILE: ALTA SURVEY .DWG TOWNSHIP - RANGE - SECTION 118-23-13 BOOK 165 P AGE:XX SHEET 4 OF 4 I� A I Irl LE G I�nIVI LL- L.L\ J (21 F -4 C] of FI,MVI&W D R. (C)8 rD L1_ {fTJ LrJ '1 L) C) 41221 1.1E ta r o r- to r is Cr / Navroirs area AG 2 41 r 7) Sir COMER Cr ear 14 •: t0 In 61 rvr"`�Ti�ly U / co co L tlk N f14E Iola r um exam N4.10fT AM M. '' ° S012939 W, a1i1A. 97 r, ERci:A n 6 I .,,l,/ (SQ. FT.) Area s in parenthesis deno te u plan d area. F 150 75 0 75 150 300 SCALE IN FEET PARK n Al r1 LV VI,1 39"W 931 SO°51'21"W 1341. 87 LEGEND CB TB CHH CONC EB GYW HYD OHU SMH UP TNH WET A-1 • • HUNTER NOTES D en otes Catch Basin D enotes T ele/Comm. Box/Ped Denotes Communication H andhole Denotes Con crete Surface Denotes Electric Box Den ote s Gu y Wire Denotes Fire H ydrant Denotes Ov erhead U tility Line Denotes Sanita ry Man ho le D enotes Utility Pole Deno tes Top Nu t of Hydrant Deno tes W edand Delineation/Flag Identifier D enotes Existing Co ntour Denotes Fou nd Monu ment - As D enoted Dento es Found Cast - Iron - Monument D enotes 1/2" by 14" Iron Pipe Set and Marke d by License No . 40344 NO SCALE DETAIL SEE AB OVE S LSE 0110714 Alai At ,wx J9l 41250 S l�>E COINER 10 2214 ALIO Ai 1 014 1 //L. S1°29'39 -W 931.94 -_ .. ..-2 017 212 126- 0110214 Ate SU S An !4 1 o —1K A8Ealtt. IN Me It WE 0'107x1 AM 9A AG 2 01 SK COMER 0r 107 (4 Alai sus ma x41- 94— A 111,1 n 61 r1IJLII 11\/1v A 116171 Arr'TrL/ V10, L1"ll ILL / A I1fITlrl kl n✓LJ I 111,110 \1\ This survey does not purport to show all undergroun d u tilities. The existin g utilities shown are shown in an approximate way only. The contracto r shall determine the ex act lo cation of an y and all existing utilities before commencin g work. The co ntractor sha ll be fu lly respo nsible for any and a ll damages arisin g out of his failu re to ex actly locate and protect all existing utility facilities. Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 651-454-0002 for precise onsife location of utilities prim to any excavation. Nor th American Title C ompany as agent for First A merican title Insuran ce Compan y Co mmitment for Title In su ran ce File No. 40852-09-04313, effective date September 23, 2009, was relied u pon as to matters of reco rd The su bject property appears to lie within Zones X and A, (Areas outside the 1 -percent auo ual chance floo dplaio, areas of 1% an nual cha nce shee t flo w floodin g where avera ge depths are less than 1 fo ot, areas of I% annua l cbaace streav, floodin g where the co ntributing drainage area is less than l square mile , or mess pro tec ted fro m the I% a nnu al cha nce flood by levees. No Base Flood E levatio ns or depths are shown within this zon e. in surance purchase is no t required in these zo om. AN D Arra s with a 1% an nua l chan ce of floodin g an d a 26% chan ce of flooding ov er the life o fa 30 -year mortgage. Because deta iled analyses are not perfo rmed fo r such aw; no depths or base flo od elevation s are sho wn within these zones. ) , per the N ationa l Flo od Ins ura nce Program, Flood In surance Rate Map C ommunity Panel N o.27053C0166E, 27053C0167E, 27053C0168E, 27053C0169, dated September 2, 2004 as acquired from the Federa l Emergency Mana gemen t A gency Web Site. A res: Parcel 1 - Parcel 2 - Parcel 3 - 3,403,500 Sq. Ft - 87,810 Sq. Ft. - 3,491,310 Sq. Ft. - 1,224,964 Sq. Ft - 33,457 Sq. Ft - 1,258,421 Sq. FL - 201,034 Sq. FL - 10,828 Sq. FL - 211,862 Sq. Ft - 78. 134 Acres 2. 016 A cres 80. 150 A cres 28.121 A cres 0.768 A cres 28.889 A cres 4.615 Acre s 0. 249 A mes 4. 864 A cres Net Right of Way Grose Net Right of Way Gro ss Net Right of Wa y Gross Current Zoning: P.U.D . 1 - 55,826 sq. ft P.U .D. 2 - 4,693,905 sq. R (Pe r the City of Medin a Zoning Map.) Sur vey c oo rdin ate and bearing basis : Henn epin Cou nty Wetland(s) shown hereo n is (are) per field loca tion of stakes as set by S vob od a Ecol ogical Res ources, A ugust 7, 2006. 61A1,A In I1n VnVV TY PICA L LOT SETBA CK R-2 HILLS I I 11 I I I ' 1 oC 1 R I O as 'Izl r t r I N1°21'47rW 6 A 11r11T1nk l nL/vI1 IV!'" NIER SO°19'59"1= 101 \ 2660.98 — Gar age Setback Line Building S etba ck Li ne R L\gllvn \ /STATES \ .:Inl L... 1 11 zl TYPIC AL LOT SETB ACK R-1 Is / LOT / J71'1 —_ ;Garage Setback Line --Building Setback Li ne DR AINAGE AN D UTILITY E ASEME NTS ARE S HOWN T HUS: 5 5 NOT TO SCALE Bei ng 5 feet in width a nd adjoining 1m lines, unless otherwise i ndicated, a nd 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines and rear lot lines, unless otherwise i ndicated , as shown on the pep . 1 1 k l [31 A Tr c' r1 11)0, L.l 1 ILV 1\ T1 1/� n n, 1 /\1 I �., B\ ,R\.,�\Jri DESCRIPTION OF SUBIECT PROPERTY P ARCEL 1 zz H R FARMS n MIVIS N89°56'19"E 1336.69 Lot 13, AUDITOR'S SUB DIVISION NO . 241, EXCEPT th at p art of L ot 13, AUDITOR'S SUB DIVISION NO. 241 Hennepin Co unty , Mi nnesota described as follows, Beginni ng at the So utheast comer of Lot 14 of said AUDITO R'S SUB DIVISION NO. 241; thence so uth along the most easterly line of said Lot 13 distant 2.3 feet; thence West parallel with the North line of said Lot 13 distant 656 .35 feel; thence North parallel with the west line of s aid Lot 14 dist ant 414.80 feet to the most northerly li ne of s aid L ot 13; thence east al ong said northerly li ne 524 .35 to the w est line of said L ot 14; the nce s outh al ong said west li ne 412 .50 f eet to the s outhwest comer of s aid L ot 14; thence east al ong the s outh line of said Lot 14 to th e p oi nt of b eginni ng. A nd ALS O E XCEPT th at part of L ot 13, AUDITOR'S SUB DI VISIO N N O. 241, Hennepin Co unty, Minnes ota, desc rib ed as foll ows: Commencing at a p oi nt on the n orth line of L ot 13, dist ant 524 .35 f eet west from the p oint of i ntersectio n of said north line with the west lin e of L ot 14 as me as ured alo ng said n orth line; thence so uth parallel with the west line of Lot 14, a distance of 328.18 feet; the nce west p arallel with the n orth line of L ot 13, a distance of 663.65 feet, more or less, to a point on the west li ne of Lot 13; thence north al ong the west line of said L ot 13, a dista nce of 328.18 feet to the northwest c omer of Lot 13; th ence east along the n orth line of L ot 13 to the point of beginning. PARCEL 2 The West Half of the Northeast Quarter, Secti on 13 , Township 118, Ra nge 23, according to the Government Survey thereof, Hen nepin C ounty, Mimesofa. P ARCEL 3 That pa rt of L ot 13, A UDIT OR'S SUBDI VISI ON NO. 241, Hen nepin C ou nty, Minnesot a des cribed as f oll ows: Comme ncing at a p oint on th e N orth li ne of Lot 13, dist ant 524 .35 feet West from the point of intersection of said N orth line with the West line of Lot 14 as measured along said North line, thence South, parallel with the West Line of Lot 14 a distance of 328.18 feet; thence West parallel with the North line of Lot 13 a diatanre of 663 .65 feet, m ore or less, to a point on the West line of said Lot 13; thence N orth along the West li ne of said Lot 13, a Mo an,. of 328.18 feet to the Northwest comer of Lot 13, thence E ast along the North li ne of Lot 13 to the poi nt of beginning . This is W certify that this map or plat and the s urvey on which it is based were made in acc ordance with the "Mi nim um Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/ ACSM Land Title Sur veys," jointly established a nd adopted by AL TA and NSPS in 2105, and includes items of Table A thereof . Pursuant to the Accuracy Standards as adopted by ALTA and NSPS and in effect on the date of this certificatio n, undersigned further certifies that in my professional opinion, as a land surveyor registered in the State of Minnesota , the Relative Positional Acc uracy of this survey d oes not exceed that which is specified therei n. Dated 2nd f April, 2010. David B. Pembert on, Professional La nd Surveyor Min nesot a License No. 40344 'Certification applies to all sheets REVISIONS M isc. City Revisions 05-13.10 R.S.M. M isc . City Revision s 06-17-10 D.B .P. Misc. Upland Calcs. 06-24-10 D.B.P. Site Revised 09-17-10 D.B .P . U Z vJ E5 0 Id_ MW W I..L 2 Q cn PRELIMINARY PLAT LL O r NT W 8 SITE: MEDIN A, MINNES OT A DR AWN DBP CHECKED DBP DATE 4/09/2010 SCALE AS SH OWN J OB NO. 5401-834 FILE: PRELIMINARY PLAT.DWG TOWNS HIP - R ANGE - SECTIO N 118-23-13 HENNEPIN COUNTY _ BOOK: 185 PAGEXX ` SHEET 1 OF 6 B2 -L1 10,788 sq. ft. 0. 24 acres (10,768 sq 9 ) 82-L2 9,607 sq. ft. 0.22 a cres (9,607 sq 6 ) B2 -L3 8,268 sq. ft. 0.18 acre s (8,266 sq ft.) B2 -L4 8,830 aq. ft. 0.20 acres (8, 830 sq ft.) B2 -L5 / 8,850 sq. ft. / 0.19 acre s / (8,650 sq ft) / y 728 / B1 -L2 8,824 sq. ft. 0. 20 acres (8,824 sq ft. ) ,-50 B1 -L4 9,059 sq. ft. 0.20 acres (9,059 sq 6.) / 63-L31 / 8,001 sq. ft. / 0.18 acre s B1 -L5 11,414 sq. ft. 0.26 acres (11, 414 sq ft.) B11 -L1 2,519 sq. ft. B11 -L3 1,920 sq. 1 0.05 acres B11 -L2 0.04 acres B11 -L4 ' ,919 sq. ft 2,520 sq. ft. 2.04 acres 0.05 acr es 812-L1 B12 -L3 2,519 sq . ft. 1,920 sq. ft 0.05 acres 812-.2 ) .04 acres B12 -L4 ,919 sq. 9 2,520 sq. ft. 2.04 acres 0 .05 a cres OL-F 410,595 sq . ft. 11.49 acres (295.433 sq. ft .) B15 -L1 B15-L.I 2,519 sq. ft. B15 -L2 2,519 sq .I R 0.05 acres 1,919 sq t 0.05 etas 3.04 acres ) REVISIONS M isc. City Revisio ns 05-13-10 R.S. M. Misc. City Re visions 08-17-10 D.B .P . M isc. Upland Calcs. 08-24-10 D.B .P. Site Revised 09-17-10 D.B.P. r U Z 0 0 W W 1- -lo ps ul / 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 Sbd 11, 6 PRELIMI NARY PLAT LL 0 SITE: MEDINA, MINNESOTA e DRAW N DBP C HECKED DBP DATE 4/09/2010 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB N O. 5401-634 FILE: PRELIMINARY PLAT .DWG TOWNSHIP - RAN GE - SECTION 118-23-13 B OOK: 185 PAGE)( N. SHEET 2 OF 6 REVISIONS 1 M isc. City Rev ision s 05-13-10 R.S.M. Misc. City Revisions 06-17-10 D.B.P. M isc. Upland Celcs. 08-24-10 D .B .P. r U Z 1- cn 5 0 0 W m W 2 1- ye `S J ss ON3 o Sbd \ 6 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT \ tL 0 SITE: MEDINA, MINNESOTA e DRAWN DBP CHECKED DBP DATE 4/09/10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO. 5401-834 FILE: PRELIMINARY PLAT.DW G TOWNSHIP - RAN GE - SECTION 118-23-13 BOOK: 165 PAGEXX \ SHEET 3 OF 6 / \ 0. 33 acres I .L _ L4 a90 5g . RJ _ _. ENTRANCE \ MONUMENT \ 75 \ 163 Park Rd B6 -L2 16,174 sq. II. 0.37 acre s I ro (16,174 sq ft.) 175 B6 -L3 I m ® 15,307 sq. ft. 1 0. 35 acre s (15,307 sq. 0) 66-L4 14,792 sq. ft. 0.33 acre s (14,792 sq. 11) B6 -L5 15,727 sq. ft. 0. 36 a cres (15,727 sq. ft.) 86-L6 16,028 sq. ft. 0.36 acre s (18,028 sq_ ft_) B6 -L7 I 14,821 sq. ft I 0.34 acres I (14,821 55.0 ) 16& I ( I � I \ I \ B6 -L8 121,283 sq. ft. \, 1 0.48 a cres 21,283 sq 9.) 06-L9 18,449 sq. ft. 0.42 acres (18,449 sq ft. ) B5 -L14 12,278 sq. ft. 0.28 acre s (12,278 sq. 0 ) B5 -L15 11,967 sq. ft. 0.27 acres (11, 987 s q. 9 ) BSL16 10,982 sq. ft. 0.25 acre s (10,982 sq. 11) B5 -L17 10,392 sq. ft. 0.23 ac re s (10,392 sq. ft. ) B5 -L18 9,574 sq. ft. 0.21 acre s (9,574 sq. ft. ) B5 -L19 9,949 sq. ft. 0.22 acres (9,949 sq 5.) BSL20 \ 11,946 sq. ft. \ 0. 27 acres \' (11,946 sq. ft.) 85-21 N I 21,284 sq. ft. 0.48 a cre s (21,284sq. fl. ) O L-G 373,480 sq. ft. 8.57 acre s (161,998 sq ft. ) POND F 1 % a rwl 100 5,0 hw l IOO GGO 86-L10 15,511 sq. ft. 0. 35 ac res (15,511 sq. ft.) B5 -L22 16,835 sq. ft. 0.38 a cres (16,835 sq. ft.) 135423 B5 -L24 12,719 sq. ft. 0.29 acres (12,719 sq. ft.) B5L25 13,782 sq. ft. 0.31 acre s (13,782 sq. ft) B5426 16,526 sq. ft. 0.37 acres (16,526 59. ft. ) B8 -L11 86-L12 14,260 sq. ft. c 11..,ea TOT LOT 5, 85-128 15,118 sq. ft. 0. 34 acres (15,118 sq. ft. ) B6 -L13 14,205 sq. ft . 0.32 acr es (14,205 sq. ft) Fee Fit Trull B5 -L30 15,615 sq. ft. 0.35 ac res (15,81559 9. ) 85-29 18,574 sq. ft. 0. 42 acre s (18,574 sq. ft. ) i 7) i 1 B8 -L14 \ 17,742 sq. ft . \ 0.40 acres \ (17,742 sq. ft.) 04-L13 10,427 sq. ft. 0. 23 acres (10427 sq ft) B4 -L14 11,035 sq. ft. 0.25 ac re s (11,035 sq. ft. ) I I I I • I B4 -L15 12,209 sq. ft. 0. 28 acres (12,209 sq. 0) I / m to OL-H 453,086 sq . ft. 10.40 acr es (390,994 sq . 9 ) Fie ld Fit TM! NORT H SCALE IN FEET Feld Flt Trap EASE MENT EASEMENT Flee Fit Tr ee 38,717 sq . ft. REVISIONS 1 M isc. City Re visio ns 05-13-10 R.S.M. Misc. City Revisio ns 06-17-10 D.B.P. M isc. Upland Calcs. 06-24-10 D .B .P. Site Revised 09-17-10 D.B.P. t J SITE: MEDINA, MINNESOTA DRAWN DBP CHECKED DBP DATE 4/09/2010 SCALE AS SH OWN JOB NO. 5401-634 FILE: PRELIMINARY PL AT.DWG TOWNSHIP - RANGE - SECTION 118-23-13 B OOK: 165 P AGE XX SHEET 4 OF 6 N cn 1 co 0 / 96-L10 15,511 sq. ft. 0.35 acres (15,511 sq ft.) 734 ` / B6 -L11 17,755 sq. ft. 0.40 ac res (17 755 sq 9 71 I B6 -L13 14,205 sq. ft. B6 -L12 L �N 0.32 a cre s u 14,260 sq ft - ' 0.32 acres .1(26i; N6 '" 15' 4-'6 l ,. 31. 4,AA • B6 -L14 17,742 sq. 6 0.40 acre s 129 OW 1,448,912 sq. ft. 33.26 acre s (446,966 sq. ft.) OL-I 38,717 sq. ft. 0.88 acre s \c \/'\ NORTH 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET REVISIONS Misc. City Revisio ns 05-13-10 M isc. C ity Re visio ns 06-17-10 M isc. Upland Calcs. 06-24-10 Site Revised 09-17-10 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 D.B.P . DBP DBP 5- o5' lL 0 a% 00i co w, Z Z � e Z ❑ q. Lu N DRAW N DBP CHECKED DBP DATE 4/09/2010 SCALE AS SH OWN J OB NO 5401-634 FILE PRELIMINARY PLAT .DWG TOWNSHIP RANGE SECTI ON 118 - 23 - 13 B OOK . 165 PAGEXX SHEET 5 OF 9 _ J 33 N87° 35`47' 1 339.90 osever 0133 ,gy m NORTH I \ \ I I N I F) 1 A TT E- f150 25 0 25 50 100 \ \.. N J1 II L_/-\ 1� 1 I — V SCALE IN FEET v v II P' U REVISIONS Misc. City Revisions 05-13-10 R.S. M. Misc . City Re visions 06-17-10 D.B.P. Misc. Upland Calcs. 06-24-10 D.B.P. Site Revised 09-17-10 D.B .P. l U Z H 5 0 m rQ v ) 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 • LIVIINARY PLAT 0 SITE: MEDINA, MINNESOTA DRAWN DBP CHECKED DBP DATE 4/09/2010 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO. 5401-634 FIL E PRELIMINARY PLAT .DWG TOWNSHIP - RAN GE - SECTION 118-23-13 BOOK: 165 PAGEXX SHEET 6 OF 6 l NOILO3S 80 --vans -a• 1".50' AA IDIQ 1131NIIIH Final Alignment to be Determined HUNTER DRIVE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING UTILITIES SHO WN AR E SHOWN IN AN APPROXIM ATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTO R SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFO RE CO MMENCING WO RK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPO NSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAM AG ES ARISING O UT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LO CATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. m a &RIQ 2Ii.LNIf1H Nouns .oz -Toana VIM 21. \� 1 WETLAND BUFFER MONU ME NT 0 CONSERVATION AREA MONU MENT Inv N- 990 .5 Field Vevey P -A1 320 LF 1r R CP i"s`o cpim SOUTH ENTRANCE (ACROSS FROM P ARK) PCB MH2 170 LF - 18' RCP MH LPark TC 1005.0 INV 891 .2 En_ B-13 0 PCBMH3 STOR M SEWER OUTLET INTO PARK PROPERTY (Final Alignment to be Determined) 1"=50' NOI1O3S,80-mina aLF'12.PCP\ —_ 4 P = MH4 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISI ON AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PR OFESSI ONAL EN GINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOT A 1" --1 .S. ,?i-1 DATE O l /37 i O RE G. NO -7-44 -Le REVISIONS BY' PREPARE PRELIMINARY PLANS NRH 09-15-10 U Z H a 0 m w 150 SOUTH BRO ADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . / DRAWN NRH CHECKED RSM DATE 04/15/10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO. 5401-637 FILE: B ASE-PRELI M.DWG SHEET UP -1 `OF SHEETS, ED NOR TH CB -A10 HR MH4 TC 1002 5 INV 983 5 BLD-201 2 iol 16 ig 81LF-15- RCP. I I.VI H!5 A� al LF-12 RCP-- CBM H-A9 HR MH3 TC 1012.0 INV 951 00 010-31' 18 RC ' MA3P 7 L- 2r R • TC 19835 / 1 ,, NV 8335 Al /- SLD-21 `! �6 / c: 121 &X RC P CSM / (4/ . \ • - \ - \ ` \ .. .. ..)\\ ■ '�� 31Mf4A5' 11 / / ( / / V \\ \ /II a �/%v , \ �I III / •�' R,1 Y 7. \t, \`I' � -r �3� _ QI 25 III \ 1�i if�l 17 I r I I 1 '`j�wi"\ ( ` 1 r _ - 4 1— — -II \ \'" —_— ��� II (t -� -_J III I I, `) -- - A Idr,� 14 / i ItiI NI mph �1, r / / , Ate, = / 4. / i aJ -ore\ EXISTING UTILITIES SHO WN ARE SHO WN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY O NLY. THE CONTRACTO R SHALL DETERM INE THE EXACT LOCATIO N OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFOR E COMM ENCING WO RK HE AG REES TO BE FULLY RESPO NSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAM AG ES ARISING OU T OF HIS FAILURE TO EXA CTLY LO CATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 40 LFTC 1. M INV. .: BLD- CBM CBMH-C 2 1i6LF-18. RCP BBLF-1SRCP CBMH{A CBM H-C3 i — -- — — — J- 26LF-1 -. - > t 20LF-12 R CP of (10114) (1011.5) I HEREBY CERT FY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATI ON W AS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSI ONAL EN GINEER UNDE R THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNES OTA 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET - -C 10125 INV 1001.6 OLD TOT LOT TC 1013.5 INV 10010 BLD-12.5 70 CB -05 28 LF - 12 RCP L DATE 0 %/!.i//o REG. NO L -P -B r REVISIONS BY PREPARE PRELIMINARY PLANS NRH 09-15-10 2, CD CD N LO LO 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOT A LENNAR CORP . r DRAWN N NRH CHECKED RS M DATE 04/15/10 SCALE AS SHOWN J OB N O. 5401-637 FILE BASE-PRELIM.DW G SHEET UP -2 OF SHEETS NOR TH �LI p /4 I I 90 I £1 I oI 115 /7 18, /7 1 MH 3 ▪ 10084 986. 3 28 LF - C 51 LF� 2 (10105) MH512 -1� TC 1008.5 NV 990.0.6 -- I90666.0 1! G 01 FB EXISTING UTILITIES SHO WN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE FYAC T LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE CO MM ENCING WORK HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAM AGES ARISING OU T OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING U TILITIES. '009.53 •c)oc tef / 7 / 7 00 si (1006 5) 0004) 201 I I 1 1�` 019 0�). I _ 1�of / r 1 :::::::, I BF 1010b '/I 1116. 1 �010Q/ �/ .M —J_ / . ' / MH 26 TC 10155 INVV9 �._ 0pe1 I `fi b-i to) I II ho�o s) a ) L � � � 3 _ , � \g i gv. i I . �`\ \ '6o rcmw In I / s \ / 91_13-23 2 ) A, x \ I r 1 ,\ o� 18 I OU TLOT F A e H 18 C )016. NV 1004 ` 0' /PAH 27 /, /TC10 0 / 7.8 MH71 TC 1013E INV 989j4. 8LD-24 y \ \ _4 j0,8'J8 - \ \ \ \ 0. 19 I \ \ j- 1� a rye - - A� - \ s - --' - - -- • _-- _ CB MH2 30 / / OU TLOT y <p. 1 .1�K11f��a � i1 R e - -• 00Sy \ A / 0 ��1d 1A OF 00 091 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 28 LFF-p -1T RCP 51MH -03 „, 28LF-1 ?RCP ' � / /4I ) �� I Ir TC 10145 NV 999 1 8 LF . 1}R CB3 H29' co lrc10130 INV 9998 BLO-1331' 23 1 \s 7 \ / / h \ 29 / / '070.80 ,J 1 .57 'a ! 1010 .90 9/701096 / 101058 ; ARE ARE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFIC ATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSI ONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE ST ATE OF MINNES OTA S, 744 4' D ATE 0 9 / 1.S7 / 0 RE G. NO 1-P11-8 - REVISIONS BY1 PREPARE PRELIMINARY PLA NS NRH 09-15-10 0 CD 47 >- N rn Z 0 cc ID m H- 0 V) PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . J Ir DRAWN NRH CHECKED RS M DATE 04/15/10 SCALE AS SHOWN J OB N O. 5401-637 FILE: BASE-PRELI M.DWG SHEET UP -3 ` OF SHEETS NORTI. LF l?R CP —r ENTRANCE MONUM ENT 32 LF 17 RC 1 5 TC 1012 5 INV 990.2 -5L0-22 PCBMH7 MH 7 TC 10138 INV 989(. EILD -20 ! 30 J 4 r /41 9M d I F5 6MH-F4 /6 L — � , 25 1007. 58 1007. 58 I 1 1007. 51 1007. 8LF-1iR�' 1 25 _x011' EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIM ATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFO RE COMMENCING WO RK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FO R ANY AND ALL DAM AGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING U TILITIES. T STMH-F2— \ ` $ OSF 24 1007.40 1006.99 007.09 y�F '007. 7 // PON D F TOT LOT \ \ \ ` \ \ A-FII 1 ` 26 \ \ 11007. 5) \ \ 2-7\ \\ 0?\ \ \ 1006.37 -' \ 1007.48 e 6i3MHF13 MH 30 00 1013.5 INV 1001 5 dLD-12 V --35 LF-i�a 28 LF -1Y RCP CB -F14 — o 25 18.07 LF-1r 93 I -:-- C i 10130 NV 999p If• 010-13f1. 7p08s3 100886 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET ( 1 1 I Imo. I 81107096 1009.8p 1010.19 1010,50 1010. 100983 '010.05 1010 .09 1010.38 L I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATI ON WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISI ON AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PR OFESSI ONAL EN GINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Mai DATE 0 9 / 1.-/ 10 RE G. NO 2 — P1 -n-8 REVISIONS BY PREPARE PRELIM INARY PLANS NRH 09-15-10 Z V i a w 1— PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . e DR AWN NRH CHECKED RSM DATE 04/15/10 SCALE AS SHOWN J OB NO . 5401-637 FILE: BASE-PRELIM.DWG SHEET UP -4 ` OF SHEETS r NORTH J A I ' t I 11 6 5 EXISTING UTILITIES SHO WN ARE SHOWN IN AN AP PROX IM ATE WA Y ONLY. THE CO NTRACTO R SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LO CA TIO N OF ANY AND ALL EX ISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMM ENCING WORK HE AG REES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LO CA TE AND PRESERVE A NY AND ALL EXISTING U TILITIES. A P / / / • / / / / // / 7, / / / < ea r . / / `�/ / / Q� / / \ // / / \N. „ f / V / ` / / / �- / 1 / 999.75 z t1 SF 1007, 0 (1008.5) // L. 999.82 . /. T / /, ///POND / ,v/ 1003.0 �A hw110040 / \ \\ \ �� / \ •\ �� // \\ \\ `��\ / / \\ \ A \ A -F 1 \ \ • \ (10015) M 13 7C `14.5 IN 994. 1 BF 1007.0 \ NI w1 1 v vet � t- v 1 1 \ `I�eS \ 1 iL, GF `14 ` 7v 0 y� I n \ „,„°501 ty 1 BF 1006? \ 1, \ \ 1 6o66'.' 61 \ /^ 1 \ v 1 I 0 1 2 11 X11 _--�------ — ----- CBM H-F1 CBM H-F1 MH 14 TJ1010u 11,995; 9/5 .14/ 999.SJ�- 1550 \• • OUT I-01 J 28 LF - 17 RCP CB -814 S 0 1008. 57 FUTURE R O \N N16.51'35^- 359 49 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET - 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TH AT I AM A DULY RE GISTERED PR OFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNES OTA. 3-. /v1 —I-' DATE ° I/IS/(O RE G. NO '-P -B r REVISIONS PREPARE PRELIMINAR Y PUNS NRH 09-15-10 PRELI MINARY UTILITY PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . DRAWN 1 NRH CHECKED RSM DATE 04/15/10 SCALE AS SH OWN JOB NO 5401-637 FILE' BASE-PRELIM.DWG SHEET UP -5 ‘..,11F SHEETS AA 1 ii,i n:1 1 ld,a rintViTar .-� L.L-\71L7 1N UFO i Luna SL1.NOB 1 r1L1 1, I N ITr ) ;1@? I N I L' \ AO A5 T A n Iy Y�1i� A✓ L g1tVlN• r 2 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. INSTALL SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON PUN, AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF PLYMO UTH OR DIREC TED BY THE ENGINEER 2. THE WATER QUALITY POND MUST BE EXC AVATED AT THE BEG INNING OF GRADING OPERATIONS TO PRO VIDE TEMP ORAR Y STORM WA TER DETENTION DURING CONSTRUCTION. SAND AND SILT MUST BE REM OVED FRO M THE POND AS NECESSARY DURIN G C ONSTRUCTIO N AND AT THE COMPLETIO N OF THE PROJECT. 101 13E: e• I lt's: )I ATTrn LJINI LJI I I LU Al As IA in 14I\V Anti v ` r\ �JJ IL •° ° ° G ° ° ham°°° �$B� ® f° o® ° 8 e -- D ® $ o o F+.- ° ®® 4` �W o a I) 0 ° l 00 ° • ° (b.:* ®o o0 ,, •194 �\ o A° ` ° oo ° • o \ T\ 0 °o S • , A , o° i 1"e' HILLS 1 I L_S^ A r, TN Lfviv -``� � � �'�••_..�,+ \ ® o 0 °o It,0 • O (6 Jp1 %N.• r.:.4."!JL �INi .5����r-. .:�e,�. Zly ei i�• i ��� , �_.,,, ,., ,. � �4^�� r Ill + otsS Q �G�PFt� ►1L�i5711 C 5 .s�L I��il 1 ' -~ �C ��� '���>��aL C�.s t • r I+! A nrlTInKI rUUI 11'JlV 3. BEGIN GRADING , INSTALL PERFORATED RISER PIPE IN PO NDS WHEN POND GRADING IS COMPLETE. TEMPORARY DRAINA GE PPE SH ALL BE USED FOR IN TERMED IATE DRAINAG E DURING THE CONSTR UC TION PERIOD AS NECESSAR Y AND DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND EXCAVATED PONDS. 4. INSP ECT PO ND , SILT FENCE, AND ROCK ENTRANCE BERM AFTER ALL RAINFALL EVENTS AS REWIRED BY THE NPDES PERM IT. 5. UNE AU. POND S WITH A MINIMUM 3' ORGANIC SOILS 8 SEED SLO PES BETWEEN NWL AND 100 YR HAI L W ITH A WATER TOLERANT PAUL (OR AS NOTED) S. REMOVE PERFO RATED RISER PIPE WHEN STORM SEWER AND OUTLET STRUCTURE FOR PONDS ARE INSTALLED. 7. POND - 10:1 BENCH (1 FOOT) THEN 4:1 MAX S. LO 8 WO PADS 3:1 MAX. ALL OTHER SLOPES 4:1 MA X (UNLESS NOTED) 9. RESTORA TION -XXJIXACRES A. RESTOR E ALL DISTURB ED AREAS WITH 4' TO r OF TOPSOIL OR EXISTING ON -SITE ORGANIC M TRL B. SEED A LL D ISTURBED AR EAS WITH M ND OT MIXTU RE 1250 AND BWSR SEED MIX FOR WETLANDS AT A RATE OF 100 LBSJAC RE AND FERTLZE WITH 20410 AT 100 LBSJACRE. (UN LESS OTHERWISE NO TED ) C. ONLY PHOSPHOROU S FREE FERTILIZER is TO BE USED ON SITE. D. M ULCH WITH TYPE 1 AT A RATE OF 2 TONS/ACRE AND DISC ANCHOR IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLACEMENT. USEW000FIBER BLANKET ON ALL SLOPES 3:1 (F1) OR GREATER E PUCE APPRO VED STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTIO N IN OR AROUND ALL STORM SEWER INLETS AND MA INTAIN UNTIL STREET CONSTRUCTION 0 COMPLETED. F. M AINTAIN ALL SILT FENCE UNTIL TURF HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. G. RESTORATION WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 72 HOURS OF GRAD ING COMPLETION. 10 SILT FENCE, BEFORE GRADING -)00( LF AFTER GRADING - 100( LF 11 TREE FENCE, BEFORE G RADING -XXX LF 12 WOODFIBER BLANKET-) NIX SY 13 SBIOR0LL -XX%LF /L1 WETLAND BUFFER MONUMEN T QC CONSERVATION AREA MO NUMENT EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFO RE COMMENCING WO RK HE A GREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FO R ANY AND ALL DAM AGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LO CATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING U TILITIES. IAIEI ATTrn 1)1VI LJI I ILL/ .E 1n,pI ON -SITE BMPS 1. REDUCE IMPERVIOUS AREA - REDUCTION IN STREET WIDTH FROM 32'7020. 2. NURP POND - NURP POND WILL 8E UTILIZED TO M EET OR EX CEED QU ALITY AN0 RATE CON TR OL REQUIREM ENTS. 3. SKIMMERS - THE POND OUTLET STRUCTURE INCLUDES A SUBMERG ED INLET PIPE TO ALLO W SKIMM IN G. 4. RIP R AP - RIP RA P WILL BE UTILIZED AT ALL APR ON S FOR ENERGY DISS IPA TION AND PROV IDE SEDIMENT CONTROL. 5. INLET PROTECTION - INLET PROTECTION WILL BE INSTALLED AND MAIN TAINED IN ALL CATCH BASINS 8 REA R YA RD STRUCTURES. 6. SLOPE STABILIZATION - SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED ALON G D OWN GR ADIENT G RADING OMITS AND WOODFIBER BLANKET WILL BE U TILIZED ON ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR G REATER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SLOPE STABILIZATION. 7. BIOR OLLS - BIOROLLS WILL BE INSTALLED A LON G REA R YARD SWALES TO PREVENT SEDIME NT FROM REA CHING THE NUR P PON D AND U LTIMATELY DOWNSTR EAM WET LANDS. 8. INFILTRATION AR EAS - INFILTRATION AREAS WILL BE UTILIZED TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF RUN OFF FROM THE INCREASED HARDSURFACE. 0 STREET SWEEPING - STREET SWEEPING WILL BE DONE A M INIM UM OF ONCE PER WEE K OR AS NEEDED TO M INIM IZE DUST CON TROL AND VEHICLE TRA CING. 10. PHOSPHO RO US FREE FERTILIZER - PHOSPHO ROUS FREE FERTIUZER WILL ALSO BE USED ON SITE. 11. ALL CONCRETE WASHO UT WASTE PR ODUCED SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE . F)7A 1r(\IANI A n \ L\711 1 e TUCKn )nl Inl 1 C:V VV\7 rl eel 4 11 ; JL"eg GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ST OR M WATER INSPECTIONS ACC ORDING TO THE MPCA STOR M WATER PER MIT. 'MI5 INCLUDES BOTH WEEKLY INSPECTIONS ANO INSPECTIONS DONE AFTER A 0.S RAIN EVENT . A COPY OF THE INSPECTION RE PO RT MUST BE EMNLED TO THE ENGINEER A ND DEVEL OPER ON A WEEKLY BASIS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES IN ACC ORD ANCE WITH THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH DET AIL ST -22 F OR AL L ST ORM SEWER INLETS AND MAINTAIN THEM AS AN EFFECTIVE SILT CONTR OL DEVICE . INLET PR OTECTION SHALL BE REM OVED WHEN RESTO RATI ON HAS BEEN ESTABUSHE D. 3. ALL RETAINING WALLS WILL REQUI RE A STRUCT URAL DESI GN, A BUILDIN G PERMIT 8 A FINAL INSPECTION RE PO RT. 4. A 1'-T C RUSHED R OCK ENTRANCE BERM SHALL BE PLACED AT THE SITE ENTRANCE, TO REPLA CE SILT FENCE, A ND MINL AZE E ROSION ON TO THE STREETS. THE R OCK BERMS SHALL BE THE WIDTH OF THE ENTRANCE AN D 2 FEET HIGH WITH 4:1 SLOPES. (SEE DETAIL) 5. THE CONTRACT OR SHALL MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FRO M THE BLAMING PAD AND STREET AREAS THROUGHOUT CON STRUCTION. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ATTEMPT TO PREVENT SOIL MATERIALS FROM LEAVING THE SITE BY EROSION MAID VEHICLE WHEEL TR ACKING. HE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING OF STREET, BOULEVARD AND UTILITY FACILITIES THAT RECEI VE ANY ERODED OR TRACKED SOL MATERIAL OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS OR MATERIAL . 7. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APP ROXIMATE WA Y ONLY . THE CONTRACTO R SHALL DETERMINE T HE EXACT L OCATI ON OF ANY AND ALL EXISTIN G UTIL ITIES BEFO RE COMMEN CING W ORK. HE AGREES TO BE FUL LY RESPONSIBLE FO R ANY AND ALL DAM AGES A RISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXA CTLY L OCATE AND P RESE RVE ANY MD ALL EXISTING UTLI RES. 5 5 R M B O N L W T 101 CURB TOPSOIL FINISHED GRADE PER GRADING PUN GARAGE FLO OR 25 ' BELO W GARAGE FLOOR WALKOUT ELEVATION CURB BASEMENT FLOOR 80 PAD (UNLESSOTNE NNVE NOTE D) WALKOUT (WO) 3:1 S • 5 R M 8 O N L W T 1 101 8.0 TOPSOIL 80 PAD NNLESS OINE SM N: MOTEL, HOLDDOWN DETAILS FINISHE D GRADE PE R GRADIN G PUN GARAGE FL OOR 25 ' BELOW G ARAGE FLO OR 2:1 LOOK OU T ELEVATION 1 LOOKOUT (LO) 5 S R M B O N L W T !101 CURB e0 TOPSOIL 80' PAD (UNLESS OMERWIAE No0 0) FULL BASE MENT (FB) N OTES: 1. GRADE (999.0) BEHIND EACH H OMESIT E IS PROPOSED T OP OF TOPSOIL 508GRADE SHALL BE DOWN 0.50 FEET. 2. ESTABLISH FINISH GRADE AT ALL 10 FRONT YARD ITTTUTY EASEMENT LOCATIO NS. FINISHED GRADE PER GRADING PLAN GARAGE FLO OR 3 .0 BELOW GARA GE FLOOR 3.1 I VIJ FA IL^ I NOT TO SCALE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PL AN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISI ON AND THAT I AM A DULY RE GISTERED PR OFESSI ONAL EN GINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE ST ATE OF MINNESOTA y2- 'T'--- DATE ° 9//S/(O REG. NO 7-!°^8 REVISIONS BY PREPARE PRELIMINARY BANS 8814 09-15.10 1 1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . 1 DRAWN N NRH CHECKED RSM DATE 04/15/10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO. 5401-637 FILE: BASE-PRELIM.DWG SHEET GP -1 ` OF SHEETS NORTH CO AH4 025 131 201 I HE REBY CERTIFY TH AT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PR OFESSIONAL ENGINEE R UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNES OTA 1 7 II 1 Tr? EXISTING UTILITIES SHO WN ARE SHO WN IN AN APPROXIM ATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTO R SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFO RE CO MM ENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPO NSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAG ES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LO CATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 23'43-0004 r 1,400 LF SILT FENCE (1011. 0) / Church of St. Ann 200 Hamel Ro ad PID 121-18-23-43-0001 4. 99 ac (217537 sf) 1012 . 0 (1011 .5) 01013 21 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET L rx 1012.0 ) 0101x5' z 1013. TOT L OT 110110 1013 .5 Fortin /Rowa n Ente rprise s LLC 215 Hemel Road PID 121-18-23-42-0001 2.81 ac (113,587 sf) P J\ D ATE 0 J f S7 i o REG . NO -1-4L/ 1-2 9 REVISIONS BY PREPARE PRELIMINARY PLANS NRH 09-15-10 U Z 1- U) 0 CC m N1 LV PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . i DRAWN N NRH CHECKED RS M DATE 04/15/10 SCALE AS SHOWN J OB NO. 5401-637 FILE: BASE-PRELIM.DWG SHEET GP -2 `OF SHEETS NOR TH A 1-I Ilii 1 r1 �- r EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPRO XIMATE WA Y ONLY. THE CONTRAC TO R SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATIO N OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE A GREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FO R ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AR ISING O UT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCA TE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. M F4 650 SF BUFFER I MPACT 1,035 LF SILT FENCE 0 ail 06 ? Wetland Impact - 3,915 sf OUTLOT F N T I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY RE GISTERED PR OFESSI ONAL EN GINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNES OTA. Wetland impact - 1,155 sf 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 0 01 � 0 ,co*R. .AI DATE AREA 1 AREA 2 0 7137/0 REG . NO -1" -8 r REVISIONS BY PREPA RE PRELIMINAR Y PLAN S NRH 09-15-10 r J PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP. J p DR AWN NRH CHECKED RS M DATE 04/15/10 SCALE AS SHOWN J OB NO . 5401-637 FILE: BASE-PRELIM .DWG SHEET GP -3 S HEETS,/ 1 `OF I ,@ I I I e I I_ NORTJ16 ' I m pti i i xo4 1 1 EXISTING UTILITIES SHO WN ARE SHO WN IN AN APPROXIM ATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTR ACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFO RE COMM ENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAM AGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FA ILUR E TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 100' 37 1007.79 r. VA 9 1.� I 1 I I \.E a�� O "10 1 a s j4 ao "°'+ "" 7 ' "` f \- 2,930 LF SILT FENCE 1 ▪ IA, - ; 1 d - 191 IIy� / .10090 \ O1 1 11�vy I 1 1 -/ I II / TOT . 1908.5 \ I;- 1 -J +-�1 f LOT \ 1� 1007W. r - I f W5.5 b I -I� A\y ; =� 1007. 09 j 1 j' 9 • 100" !.0 555 LF • 1001.0 1007.46 1 /p -`- SILT FE - y / O e 1 x1001.0-,_ -- --- - - - - _ fool., -�_.J 21 �y-`t-- , .1. I + J i \▪ , 2"7' \ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDE R MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSI ONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 00,0. 50 010. 30 0 O ib 50 25 0 25 50 100 6 00 -• P .1 SCALE IN FEET 1010.09 0 00 g O o 0 clo 0 0 00 O 0 O 6 00 O Q 0 Q: 0 ®0 0 (.7 (4) 40 0 i M _ 0 00 o 0Q �0 O O� v 7 0 Q.y O / 0 0 01=1 / & O 0 00/ ®� 0 Or ' 0 / O® O OJ ®62 `O 000 o°"/ 0� o o (O 0 r. O 41'4 . / �-/.,� DATE O 9/ I S/ i O REG. NO 4L g r REVISIONS BY PREPARE PRELIM INARY PLANS NRH 09-15-10 Z 0 W m 1- v ) 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 PRELIMIN ARY GRADING PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . DRAWN N RH CHECKED RS M D ATE 04/15/10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO . 5401-637 FILE: BASE-PRELI M.DW G SHEET GP -4 \OF SHEETS, -1 221 9J• 31 • 261 g1 8 ,4' �I I I a 10010 PROTECT EXISTING STO RM PIPE • w DURING GRADING ACTIVITIES 26 Z5 (1007.5) (1007.5) ,� (1006.5) T•� (1006.6) C I __5) '1,-, •, T"- JZ 1 vl I 1 0 00 7 00 00 0 0 (00 ' 0 >l 0 86) 0� 0 0 0 0 0 rt11�5 \ �IR I 0 V f ,, 1 \I \ .. 0 -.• ,..:1 Imo,, ,," s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 O O o 0 0 0 0® �:J 0 0 O 1 0 00 0/ ®cQ 0 0 0 00® Ol O �® `O 0 o °�i6 0j00 P °° - 8 0 00 -,-, A 0 00 � 0 0a) 0 0 0v 0 0 0 %° 8 0 0 0 0 -0 0 6)� 0 0'I0 0 0 O OO c 0 1 V 8 0 8 0 1000.34 0 0 0 cP 00 0 ,000.98 ,'' `t OS 38' 13 "E 143 14 / 1001.0 .y0 1 5g CL 98. 53 1 f i0 WOO_ ,Pel {l/ J = 8 EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHO WN IN AN APPROXIM ATE WAY ONLY. THE CO NTRACTO R SHALL DETERM INE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPO NSIBLE FO R ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING O UT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 0 OUT -LOT J 0 (� 0 0 00 0 OO 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 0 n 0 0 O' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPA RED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNES OTA. 664 SI /v- 1 DATE 0 9/ ('f/I0 REG. NO '- P -B PREPARE PRELIMINARY PLAN S 5514 08-15-10 ORS 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 Sb� 0) N3 THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . FILE \OF DRAWN NRH CHECKED RS M DATE 0415/10 SCALE AS SHOWN J OB NO 5401-637 BASE-PRELI M.DW G SHEET GP -5 S HEE TS, 1 EXISTING UTILITIES SHO WN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY O NLY. THE CO NTRACTOR SHALL DETERM INE THE EXACT LO CATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COM MENCING WO RK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING O UT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. I HEREBY CERTIFY TH AT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISI ON AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PR OFESSI ONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 0 0' 00 0 OU7LO7 J 0 0 0 00 „oo; ° 0 0 Oo p i ''.- 6 4, '' o, �l J/ G V J O o �+A+.� D' O o f ' r0 I% 0 000s(1) -100 '(61:, _O p0 i! , 9 /p 1 dtt- pp 0 0 0 p `4.4, 0 00 `%,,0 O 0 :10 p% ca d0 A O/ —ii P00 0 4:',! O ,j.0 /0 ¢ d O .'gyp ° i5 `" 0p' ¢ 00 lA 00= eca 0 1 oq 0 0 `� p8 0 ®o..o o 000 p p1 o -a o$ // O O O - '0 o p°O @ 8 0,03 709 0 00 00 00 A cc) 0 0 / O p 0 . a fp6 0 p. o°Q. 6 0 0/00 c g 0 / ' p0 O p O 86) 0% 1 8 p® 00 0: CO 0 0 �DO 0 ' 0. 0 O O 0 0 ,� 0 0 0 0. 06, 0 0 0 00 ® 0 p 00 % 08 0 0 0 0 0 Y O 0 O ® 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 o LI B n 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o��o�a 0 �0 �0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 50 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET ✓/>��( .S, A��-� D ATE O 7//s7 (0 REG. No 4L%L-8 REVISIONS PREPARE PR ELIMINARY PLANS NRH 09-15-10 l 55391 (952) 476-6000 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN 0 0 y} THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP. 1 DRAWN NRH CHECKED RSM D ATE _.._ 04/15/10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO 5401-637 FIL E BASE-PRELIM .DWG SHEET EC SHEETS ` GE / HUN 99?. 1,,,-996 / Ot ) I / \yam \ ORAVE1- DRI AY 1 1 / / / I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL EN GINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNES OTA. 1005 491 \ 492 EXISTING UTILITIES SHO WN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTO R SHALL DETERM INE THE EXACT LO CATIO N OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPO NSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAM AG ES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LO CATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. \ \ 467 533 1006.39 1007. 26 \ 1007.35 / / 1009.53 1009.7 1008. 62 / / / 1 / 1 29 31 56 12 44 46 17 16 24 39 37 e \ r I 61 1» 109 5, 15 34 19 60 62 4 3 109 40 43 92 1 20 41 101 1 57 111 96 94 100 117 27 97 66 304 337523 4»� 496 3!0 1008.60 \ / 33 26 2l 39 49 .4 47 1 25 1 01 136 100 156 124 122 155 164 1.6 126 �J7 19 74 82 1A 2 129 PRELIMINARY COPY 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 99 n 57 73 6 52 91 461 855 540 492 59 \ \ 531 N \ 513 1 `N�/1 4. 1� O 542 495 / 3i 511 i3 / `/ 521 \ \ __ 473 J / We/ / / , I 512 / <_` 556 95 72 71 349 557 414 360 1 343 541 517 554 490 /%' �C ' DATE 0 9/ 1.5-71 0 REG NO 1^011-8 551 NO RTH \ r, REVISIO NS BY1 t U Z H a w m W 2 /Q V i EXISTING TREE SURVEY THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP. 1' DRAWN 1 NRH CHECKED RS M DATE 09-15-10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO. 5401-637 FILE: ENCLAVE2-TREE SURVEY.DWG _ SHEET TS -1 VF TS -10 SHEETS 7 / / 1003.31 \ 492 \329 497 \ 493 4,5 527 485 31 I470 191 501 4P1 514 476 'S0! 472 n0 / `.J'-- ? 506 497 V `1 445 r/ L.I J// // / / // /2 // lnv 003 10 427 419 V /1' EXISTING U TILITIES SHO WN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPRO XIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRAC TOR SHALL DETERM INE THE EXACT LOCATIO N OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMM ENCING WORK HE AG REES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FO R ANY AND ALL DAM AG ES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXA CTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING U TILITIES. 45 443 467 539 489 516 507 6. 91\ 469 515 503 502 471 500 / 29 r32 35 42 11 M 13 21 29 36 le 107 96 9� 9 93 91 135 101 94 109 111 -� 100 10 3 145 139 139 161 140 157 100 147 1.96 136 121 142 191 193 148 450 481 , 44 0 / 494 534 85 7/ 162 112 460 483 552 i 30 32 541 5 46 1007. 51 PRELIMINARY COP Y 15 6 173 165 174 144 172 134 177 113 132 170 160 151 141 163 169 106 1OS 179 93 104 139 166 171 362 197 182 196 105 124 12 2 155 164 111 149 146 118 150 152 195 12 9 128 113 154 137 127 es 206 120 115 225 119 194 809 216 191 253 201 226 198 219 eel 214 189 110 199 213 263 2 27 185 190 196 189 187 800 003 227 235 286 3 39 3d 1.240 \ 590 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 341 204 269 814 207 203 132 218 215 195 262 2 34 1010 .98 759 232 130 210 2S7 P29 241 231 204 25 2 154 7 75 298 813 244 260 22 2 206 217 212 211 230.6 261 1011 .23 ro e 268 265 371 2 76 272 23 7 264 242 334 355 339 2 40 170 696 343 313 34 2 196 285 190 311 2 94 2 73 243 271 2 6 352 333 396 803 349 249 266 228 '010 .80 253 363 42 318 335 366 3 6d 31,1080 29 0 3 33 345 3 57 1010.96 370 301 277 315 812 299 765 799 827 891 I33 806 806 813 104 8339 100996 831 834 917 909 936 796 766 767 1Q / / 819 950 347 832 58 11011 03 1035 J1025 1032 '010.05 132 798 81 76 9 1010.04 047 055 1160 1046 059 1010.09 1061 1049 AREA 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISI ON AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PR OFESSI ONAL EN GINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA . 1'4 rL�✓ DATE O 1/ I-5-/ to REG. NO 1.—i^I' R-8 REVISIONS J BY U LZ 1 (1) a Mw ce 1- V/ CD v 2 2 a co m 0 J EXISTING TREE SURVEY THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP. t DRAWN NRH CHECKED RS M DATE 09-15-10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO . 5401-637 FILE: ENCL AVE2-TREE SURVEY .DWG SHEET TS -2 tOF TS -10 SHEETS/ 1 1000 1973 16 98. 62 u11E 6 Apaa 0 0 EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY O NLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATIO N OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WO RK HE AG REES TO BE FULLY RESPO NSIBLE FO R ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING O UT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LO CATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING U TILITIES. 100706 1002 I HEREBY CE RTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATI ON WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 999.70 1P'A 12% 1797 Ie80 S81° 46'49"E 285.11 PRELIMINARY COPY 3" 609 5m / 569 , / 60 7 7007. 92 609 / / 559 2 61k \ 612/ 402 "� 16' 97775✓ 614 710 / 9 61 613 t 376 381 616 740 L cP' 714 / 399 409 617 7008. 0) Y: 3 670 660 959 901 716 / 99 6 463 37 7 741 60 / 406 6 6r 677 744 180 1346 831 77 049 1 'ea, I 1 1021 1032 / 1010.01 8.'76 997 '003. 3 90 7 a7. 1046 1049 1050 991 901 1059 1031 915 028 912 951 859 930 918 p7 1090 993 863 917 979 1023 669 944 1029 913 878 600 397 619 393 39 4 990 390» 736 934 917 Spy 936 93, 839 1009. 935 7 17 7 19 712 665 1003.39 709 / 720 '003. 23 711 703 600 742 / , 45 1006.66 /7 44 73 4 115 TJI 7 15 914 97 7 903 885 916 696 905 9129 966 876 %7 9K 665 871 904 910 691 1CO::`,3 9w 993 , 694 991 956 1094 9e 1037 947 841 999 921 872 999 673 649 896 924 926 934 909 950 939 1006 947 936' 1015 966 961 673 63 3 1019 7Lp 736 737 67 4 954 973 1009 1016 972 935 1017 1018 943 949 999 1014 956 954 9 56 944 990 ,• ) / 1019 978 991 / 969 Ion �3j� 99S 4330 726 735732 I— i 679 X000 `93 %7 9)0 969 4 670 997 9x 1537 . ... 1005 102 385 ` � / 469 72'5 .../ 68 6 991 , 971 J]S 72777 / 604 ,04,9 100800k 9s0 371 391 72 9 ;14f 696 / 9 2 68 7 681 996 993 110 399 656 670 722 667 773!9\ 701962 I178� 11 44 IPIP 904 985 976 ll% 1193 197 649 659 \ 11801176 ltx 120 626 689 664 � 700 . / 791 1161 1196 !Jx 1810 1191 663 / 1196 629 750 662 661 6 81 698 1190 1199 11710 1197 ,H0 690 _. .. ,. .. . - .. _ . .. .. . _ F. f9f2 1179 1181 1191 1 219 1206 1211 819 199 630 626 697 719 1,99 12 05 405 649 688 6% 1189 120➢ 1196 411 627 634 704 699 1280 1151 1145 937 940 960 965 941 8 96 Bx 92 7 890 867 971 946 693 995 1021 1027 1022 1099 1034 / A77 942 / 997 963/ 905 1013 102 1 1004 9 63 1011 931 933 \ 1003 941 1096 397 420 411 112 413 416 417 414 563 566 362 596 416 591 393 1 254 593 '589 50 25 0 25 50 658 587 748 62 2 ti 9 49 747 0 72 1 641 666 749 631 676 68 6 637 657 631 652 645 645 620 ?u 693 694 691 647 644 564 640 629 604 380 625 �9. 570 623 577 lie 579 619 579 630 636 392 '191 639 591 .197 603 100 SCALE IN FEET 504 397 633 633 375 15159" 598 632 599 561 605604 633 601 571 1131 1132 595 1164 1131 1177 11 36 1169 573 1191 1145 1160 1149 1173 1152 1l3174 1143 1150 11661149 1153 1130 1133 59,49 1478 °57'35"E 3i'' !99 1138 1161 1194 1170 0�1 ,50 100034 1134 967 7)9 1042 1043 1169 1171 1175 1167 177 1204 l007.95 1000.9 9 N 1036 , 2 2 1041 DATE 0 lit -CV / 0 RE G. NO 1-P1-rz-B 1 044 NORTH REVISIONS BY0 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN . 55391 (952) 476-6000 EXISTING TREE SURVEY THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . e DRAWN N RH CHECKED RSM DATE 09-15-10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB N O. 5401-637 FILE: ENCLAVE2-T REE SURVEY.DW G SHEET TS -3 `OF TS -10 SHEETS' l 1338 1574 1557 1253 1595 1572 1391 1338 1588 1236 184.1 1263 1841 41 12 1255 1111 .4 4... ,. .4„.141,13°' 1218 1251 924 9 12! 1 t., 1844 1860 1214 1309 12 61 1841 111e3 12371243 4243 1X1181 12127 1403 1186 1188 19 143 1231 18. 58 1 l 12171219 1266 190 4 1=E' 1.49 ° '.3. 3, ', rJl... �l¢. 1232 2853 4 90' 14. 1^^; 9y. ----VII 1415 1414 1457 / 1463 wil .0.^ 60 1.36 • 4 .-----1.66 II BP 1471 146„4„ 1113 14 1191 1494 1475 ,173 1490 149 6 '',41 „ 1495 X:74. 196! 14 1493 1498 1476 1483 1489 ,.70 ,465 1464 1461 1471 1497 1479 1478 1485 1428 1427 1467 1453 1144 1439 2445 ''•1s 3161 1440 1450 I 1 1491 EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHO WN IN AN APPRO XIMATE WAY O NLY. THE CONTRA CTO R SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAM AGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 1458 PRELIMINARY CIP 1' 559 4573 1361 158 6 1599 123 8 1813 1 443 1257 1234 1387 425 34 25 1560 1351 1567 1522 1576 1233 1382 1399 1579 1575 1590 1331 1378 4391 1333 134 8 1399 1424 1416 1749 1525 I5r8 1553 1550 1509 1556 1313 1547 153 7 1548 1369 1369 1558 1367 1357 2312 1356 1353 1330 13313 1535 1329 1507 15 63 1515 1515 15. 32 1514 1598 1535 1334 1593 151E 1666 13 01 199)6 1543 1968 1 520 1517 1521 1518 1526 1511 1345 1119 1119 1123 1346 1510 1533 1378 1339 1334 V 1 512 1 54 1516 584 1365 1516 1311 1375 1}84 1371 1329 1331 1335 139 4 1377 13361390 1954 1396 13 83 1373 141 9 14L 1435 :4n 14 02 50 25 0 25 50 100 S CALE IN FEET 1307 1370 1394 1371 1397 999 14, 1107 1403 1492 ” 1399 1372 1405 4 1409 1362 1719 1577 156e 1309 13 22 1313 1 314 1316 1319 1366 1327 1319 1368 1376 1326 `� X7156. 1502 15(X1 113p 51303 1431 1411 , ' 56 15414 I s\ 1504 1 570 2360 1417 11 35 ' 15 05 1324 \.4 ` 136 1310 1157 1385 1342 1389 1315 135' 1317 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPA RED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY RE GISTERED PROFESSI ONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNES OTA . "5- DATE 0 7/ is--/ ( 0 REG. NO -7--P-r" II NORTH REVISIONS BY 55391 (952) 476-6000 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN MEDINA, MINNESOTA DR AW N NRH CHECKED RSM DATE 09-15-10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB 50 5401-637 F LE ENCLAVE2-TREE SURVEY . DWG SHEET TS -4 OF TS -10 SHEETS F I HE REBY CERTIFY TH AT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISI ON AND THAT I AM A DULY RE GISTERED PROFESSI ONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNES OTA !,n fc7 li �� 11 11 \I\ CR\ 00 EXISTING UT LITIES SHO WN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIM ATE WAY O NLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERM INE THE EXACT LOC ATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFO RE COM MENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAG ES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING U TILIT IES. r 1,400 LF SILT FENCE 0 TREE SAVED O TREE RE MOVED O TREE EXEMPTED Q TREE DEAD /9 l7 50 25 0 25 50 100 S( 'v1 F IN FEET $01 13 9f +- I�--Ln i_ O we 0 9 8331 313 511 1,3 \ 0359 o- 5413 90 Al ,A) NORTH DATE ° 7/ I sl I ° REG . NO -0-n-R / REVISIONS BY1 1 1 0 co co ce m O TREE RE MOVAL PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . e DRAWN NRH CHECKED RS M DATE 09-15-10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO 5401-637 FIL E ENCLAVE2-TREE SURVEY.DWG SHEET TS -5 `OF TS -10 SHEETS/ 1 2i / / I HEREBY CERTIFY TH AT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISI ON AND THAT I AM A DULY RE GISTERED PROFESSIONAL EN GINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNES OTA (I I ._ �l i I rJ EXISTING UTILITIES SHO WN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERM NE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COM MENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY R ESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 1007.7g O TREE SAVED 0 T REE REMOVED O TREE EXEMPTED O TREE DEAD 11 \ 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET / '000.96 /431 11f 1 k 1010 .38 01160 1047 am .- . AREA 2 S -4-- • DATE 0 7/ i s-1 i 0 REG. NO 2-0Ll1^8 NORTH r REVISIONS BY TREE RE MOVAL PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . DR AWN 1 NRH CHECKED RS M DATE 09-15-10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB N O. 5401-637 FILE. ENCLA VE2-TREE SURVEY .DWG SHEET TS -6 OF TS -10 SHEETS, i 0 r, "- 3,230 LF SILT FENCE EXISTING U TILITIES SHO WN AR E SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY O NLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERM INE THE EXACT LO CATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE CO MM ENCING WO RK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FO R ANY AND ALL DAM AG ES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 31z 2,930 SIL LFENC X 7 TOT \ % LOT O TREE SAVED 0 TREE REMOVED Q TREE EXE MPTED O TREE DEAD 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1047 loos/ •96 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATI ON WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISI ON AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSI ONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 'S' " DATE 0 9/ I s] I 0 RE G. NO 1—f ^ '8 cr 1041 1 REVISIONS BY i r U Z 3- C!) ce w m w 3- TREE REM OVAL PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . e DRAWN NRH CHECKED RS M DATE 09-15-10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO 5401-637 FILE: ENCLAVE2-TREE SURVEY.DW G SHEET TS -7 `OF TS -10 SHEETS " 6662 bt pp ��, /��, y 193 119 0 ����JJJJJ 475 473 ^ 11]6 485 s a9 I. 11]8 478 a1 2492 1429 1631' .63 6_ .66 }'��{ 3- CJl ��'% lip .6s `-�� (t, 4 Y.. .' 42 13.61 u\ )6t 1451 459 30 EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERM INE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFO RE CO MMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING O UT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE A NY AND ALL EXISTING U TILITIES. -T459 4449 OUT -tor al Q TREE SAVED O TREE REMOVED O TREE EXEMPTED TREE DEAD 114 522 34 1131 110�' 1l 1547 1- 237 6 ( y `11.13 1.16 569 1113 1329 414 1407 1110 1 105 . 1.c � 114x .2 . ,, 1409 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 15��4y1 l'1 1 4, 1533 0 1 162 1411 1 (.J. 110 13 14 1!7! 1 / C�� ��j 1306 0 1142 1517 1 j8 111'6 1564 x' 1511 11 13 45 1411 / I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLA N OR SPECIFIC ATION WAS P REPARE D BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE ST ATE OF MINNES OTA . 1109 118% 1378 1324: 131161 1369 i: \ NO RTH DATE 0 q ( S/ ( 0 REG. NO ' PyZB REVISIONS BY DRAM:N NRH CHECKED RSM DATE 09-15-10 SCALE AS SHOWN J05 NO 5401-637 FILE ENCL AVE2-TREE SURVEY .DWG SHEET 01 TS -8 TS -10 SHEETS ABBNSIaite129E6666E6A 6WWdWNYddysgbONA4Nd9Ngta6atoa=1A94A4694A®898®98898888884889888 88:SE a8888848ABBBN488X8S8608At8888WNtlNUW88818988W88 80 S4SS:Gq.ammmo.." p ` NN mtiti aetidgg bgga�g��g�g�g�g�a aPT HI a�iti$ItitimmWmbtiaea!a!mdmmtig!aaa!ddd!!!q P N !!!!titia n !!" W � ti$ atiga $ g mIP " W O T O T gig$$$ ��ad � 1 I _ ON 'D3a 0 / /sj /b 0 3IVG Nc< opp mrni ~ z ~ m > N Z ti S° m — Z yp`›O /off/ @@99@@9@9@@B65&BESB?619999@@14999999@@tl49i M 51,1 18§14899@9@4@@99994964918@99911995959e5M199949949110919914166366Y66661999999149199994A@4@1211 M 49619@99@AA4 D O, op VT op mp cm mZ �o S;^,' 1 1 1 1 anm�au:�"�oem�EkxOsxse��s�e�'��emm;mNe��2"smm�Pvy�v_enm�mv:�v�onm�EvS�v�emv5ma"e��5oms�xveWv�eem5av:W��oem:iwa:cc_eem�ae:e���xanmu:enemmemv.deaemm��:�v�obteme:Wawb pi � �� X 11 Eit t emaamu=kbWmSoie=aaaaegks: illtEMNEH :atl=mN=N B'tl=8111 me= NxooWm�=kbWdeoN=adcaeWYo:ktlY=kGb'Yeaeva_o„dNv�...,--ao2Jd000.oW..,a oo m^do3:K£i=tlmo8t=fio=oY^dbuo=dN:,dod4=U:o=�=dN:,�e=;.:q=god N000 =',dq==m21o��a a SS 1 WiWN-a d, ss.W Y =Y It C= X XX Y S St R' S. X dgBS __ SO Adam 1. =eSSY2e =SY Ct,S= Nqd dq= e vond:=N=atsNava�vNaNaYva 1 1 rXX:3»"Y.S XS:2 XS:GXXS 2S=SYi .a XY=Xst :t➢.X R/ al SA 1 999^55 M A1909A41A491A0114A14916S66E6056A19 M A49AA9AA4A M os, aatcq=alAAAA4AA4A1994491941919dE'tl1411555:5MMF M5* ****1 110** 4*1dEti6SiWMFO M * 00*g****0110'2 P PI 1 € Fe WW$ti!!!d a $ ati Mti H% Wd dPdti W9P !!!tin!5111 g4 tiatitiEdmn mntiti?1g dg T dg ?gis ti xmeMW egg gMiMtigIti tiff ga!ti ti tiff dti 1 dE=Sapp-mggttl'mod8gcddSbdmWak3St336qd=dNSdtNYgtldtdg YmdS=mS8YSY6=SNtlmAYN66=Y6dtYWWdgN66S=mq=tl=6m6d68mS=4gm88=Yma==titSWA=tl64mYW=q6=688166=t=Nt=Yma8,16N6Y66mmY mda Ry RR tl 2Se Xe1Ctl5Y 3 etl X t a e SYS !S.'e Se e O 2 2' YA S *lb 619199491491999949&49699992Aa9619@99494919499@9b49191849141559559555511199@9141111@99@44166866i66461AA'd@8818118&614tl5A$$Y MLIV 81dm4AI M §I A0AA4AA4A11099414 W if g�gg§gII g10gg $g$ $g$g! $$ g �`?`I ���`?`I�P On�g �� ti l a$$$�agg `�$Il�� �$�� ��$� $01300 0513 50 $5§313O13 013 501313 14§ 1313 �e0131300 5130050 $I$�a �d�1350 0a ! g � N qGb=qu E4m_8=mgdSamatmEmmm tldEddgaS=iWm Smy SS N� S=tYemRdlY= ISagmEBSgYS G[8166=g6gtEYG=EmYEmEmN q'd aYWSYmEaY [K=EuGS NdYaSgS SRRNEYm=tl tm Y S S m t Nq'mE=ggmm='oBm=S=mgd66m6imammmmddaddgaG=BWmNtoNN6mdASSdNNd6=tYSmRdi atgdAmEB'mq's89'm'a8166=g6tedtG=a YEmdobig t8dg'amd6Nmti=E'00000T00401131RN0Km=d'>mdm861kiZ SNm013 • 1 RI YS43LX3 2 3R 32 Y3 3 Y I SM. - SSY S Mt tl R 3 Y if !t e r tt a Y et e as e X X • ere ra es* aa1* 2 'al.a 13. 31 1 1 @64444"""11114994199393:334314144"141"14dIi2A121ei""6"e1191"""1"g"4a91""gP."4 944AA2A@1@99@9@"11@99@914@999&54994919119411411901149149660668614 W `f 61 sg b g ill IONi IMPITMI g inMHIMMOIMA��- ���Fa ��� � HUHI Miiigiaa atia �a a$ a� � i Me� mmaa O I I m SmtlmSmmm8Xmmmmm88mm=BEmm8omEmm=mamdam085m6mmam=ggtdm8SWXmmWmYWmm8SmS080888m==Ed mm=maammagmmmm=madSEYd==q=NES=mYYq=amS=q=d6m808.0.=G=Y==YYq=dggNNaqWd=EENammdw 1 11 I'1 s 2 1 5. 1 6 1 1I I THTgggg€ PggHgg ggOMMHPUTTHOTggggg gigMggggWIM4TUTTgggMMTIOgggggggggggi4 WOUTTM$gggg MIOTFIRITO TITWIgg�g�g OTIT MTgi f mSGcmmammmmmmWg6m4m_mdW6=6aummmaamaaamam.mEmmgmaa6admm_6mm=N=g6Ym6mm66mm6=8=m-m_mmaam=a=-mamgaaadmdmA=am6mgd6m6=m66tNmmdm6AmammE maGa6m_m66m66mmmmmmmmmammummE 3 mSSEmBEmGEmmmEi llim=mdWB=adgmmm6'oma'o6mam=m-mmmgm6666dmm=6mm=N=gEYm6mm86mmoo='mm=m=m=mm66m=6==m6mg6S6dmdmd=6m6mOddo6=m66YNmmdm-odmommSmm6d66m=mEEm660006mmmmm6mmgmm6 aOAIIa.d i!c IiD n.q.0IiREAX.m = �.q4 1 1 1 1 y 41.v 9.y.183?1$1%A -: **4444 ,44.4.1* -41144c 1 .? y . 4 # s 4-r e. Qq a IRi 1 (II cnm —�q 0- Z m m ILE ENCLAVE2-TREE SURVEV.DWG JOB NO. 5401-637 SCALE AS SHOWN i). 0 CHECKED RSM DRAWN NRH TREE REMOVAL CALCULATIONS THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 m 0 z • co " r D3a of/sl/6o f& d066GKJq.n0 m $0 $$a$Rmii6866zi666m6m4mmQ6$066@mmm669m6m4i3mm896mmm@6mi69iiff$Rm$mmB66mm66mm666m6 i m66Rm6gmgmmm66m666mBImlAAAAi6AARmmmmmARmm 11 I if 1 Is ii g li $ IWWII$IIIIIA;;dIIII$aA a��$AA II IIIII da 2I I$aeIdHTIIIII II$a $ IWIIIIHIT d����1;ORMM gag MTMH MHOT��gIMIIIITIITd g a ga WM I 6 NaaP6Nk8GYM6a866 8FG.m6H6o6d=6mGF.6606'm6mmmm'-dGm6m'm8 66A-8G6mYF66m0066m'wGYY666Y.1tlm6gdm66m-6m.NamtmaYm-6dC66gam6dYmm666-KK6mY66a6.g 68Gd6dYm866Y6GGd.Y'-amaaGm Y a as Y 1 z. tlMiM29666m6A6AiiR PAAti@Ag4A66iS8ii$FAIiJp igiig6'nigif)i@ll@WAT?23ygNtl5MOtgivitgfit$613. itussssissyso,soss$$$$$$$$$$$ttolmsiusss ssseegsss salts f I j ga Ig g T K -����'A ����$����TT ���� ���� ���� I$$ Mgi T ��Ta $ITT g PTHT T TTT Tg gi iY ; $s TTTT G TT a T $$8 0030 It J K ti m =d668.Vm.6dNA6GN668KN6dN666Aaa6YY6.g6666a6N6I6 ." Gm'6m.06Y6CINm6=NNGa6.G6060G66..Fggy666nm666-KKY-6666Gan6.mG6a.6Y u aG6G 68GGt'6aamGm68d6 t6.6tln" AdYu6F.NW$60 ue 1 -c.aa AAAAAAazrp.;0oa4pa.� Y 4a 33 6133333 kl-SA �t,X4Aral( ��R r B99a99696�66il96466�AIVI a iv3x99A��6AA4966m666ta$ri6ii$$$$$$s6ssm MA29 6i6m9666m666iy566@i;AQ66sek&Y689666m66@6fiR666666666m6mmm66@Smy66 Miti 66Rii69ii66666669ii4E40 41 l I '1 $333333(303333��$d��$figs$d3$ 333 3333 353333�3333339333 03.3 380$X06$0 '�0000 683g36303P6������060606$ 3Q3g33��3��335636303X 0030 $O,ffi $ ;V666��19�� gC/����la ��o-$-- 1 v K Kw' m 6 '+mu Nmo gtlm 6 6 a6KdGGdOdua" 6683-N66aFN6tb36 6I66NGF6 dYd6d66-" 6K'-a6FtlG6G G68GmY6tta6G'm'e6664t6a8G6Y66660'eYGYaaKG66K'664:1666FF6m6Y" a6665'-a6 6 .GNmY m6m6GNNaYFmGYmkA6a=Ya6YdFd6Y..s 1 3301 3 a; d 6 ad d 1 1 8 3t6 S 1 II 1 1R S Is (s 33 3111 1 $lo w i li01$26Gmri6666m666m66y66l666miimm6mRA66md6amml66s"ami;6386636666666Ei366666O666m66�o$?$neR6m6$69AAAAQAo4AAAaA949A4A963M5 6966396�906 Aiiii 6619466461iti M i i if ���� Ig o Ig l�� ���� I 00060��6Y*006 ��_$$$_ $ $�����_$$!!_��$$!a��3 63 (6!60$630 6 0X6800F0600$03686A��3a*3668 0080*(00800(5*063Y0Ff06i066000306360330630I3808 *633333333330$$F6$G_3��I33o3 . FYGI 6 lg6G 6��uY6s^GA6'm K.6a��G6d6P6166 6 6ICYYG 6'u 3653665336 gY6uuuK6aG6 F -n6666a madudYYGdYaY'o 666.'6 a6m6,amn6G66Ya6Y'o 6q-6650 6 I 66..Amqu6m_.d6a6G6 dn Nm6 Y0YG0d6t!'u6G66N5F6d8N6G0.6Gd56dmtl6.m6NYmm500YY6N'm 33YGFddGFFGBGYdGGGY6G65860m" N66666a8ma8330(410406666.dGNG683m66366Ka6K668333 m6808=66..umuG6mYFd6Gt56tlyd6m.Nm6S 2 r E g p yA N O ��[ e J w > > > 3 n d O 3 " 3 m 0 6 a II 3 3 CO 3 3 1 1 11 2 Rr 1 s 'O ILE: ENCLAVE2-TREE SURVEY.DWG JOB NO. 5401-637 SCALE AS SHOWN CHECKED RSM Cn CO 1 1 m  1-1q s20 a c ��i�� Z 00 N m m `_  ../ TREE REMOVAL CALCULATIONS THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP. l SATHRE BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 m Co 0 z w Tree Replacement Planting Schedule 10 -- e: 3vaasaTnrnx 200 100 0 100 200 400 0 SCALE IN FEET Buffer Yard Pla ntings t 11 1r Re pla ceme nt Re place me nt Re placeme nt Re place me nt Tree Tree Tree Evergreen 2. 5" 311 4" Front Yard Tree Ex. Tree Tree Repaacment Re quireme nts 1816 Caliper inches removed Replacement=561 Trees 4" Cal=227, 3" Cal=148, 2. 5" Cal=186 Front Yard Trees are no t Included in Calculation KEY COMM ON NAME BOT ANICAL N AME SIZE QTY. NOTES .Q Tre es AL Redmon d Linden T Tge.meric ane 'Redmo nd' 4 48 15 *eight single leader A L3 Redmond L ,den Ube eauare R edmo nd' 2198 28 *0901 eagle feeder AS2 0uarp A spen Popw4penudkla 2.548 13 *swain99 leader BB2 Blue Beech Carper. mdkke ne 2.528 20 5Wlghleing0 leader BO Bur Oak On eness m eoocerpe 4 413 15 W elyhtelnyle le ader HA2 Heckbwry cow ac e.. 2 .548 28 *eight single leader 01 Skyline Honey...41 Gw airew tr una nau WOW. *S.M ..' 420 17 Weigle angle leader Hl3 Skyline 1bneybocust wrwme a4 mda ' 3138 Yl Y Mg02 aegis leader IW2 110MICCId 0a na 410 . 80 2.528 42 Miele single le ader PE3 Pr8 Aelm Elm 3'139 fl etagl4 single leader PE Princeto n Cirri 448 3 el eple single I..der PO Nad em Pin Ook wane es8riYle 41313 12 simple angle leader RB River Birch &0Aa ae 12 B8 24 m altl40em R142 Red Menl o w 2.5 -BB 23 4.04 single l eader 8043 Rad Mapl e Apornblun 3199 12 eteiale ang le lead er WI Rad Mrpl e 44. r • nOna n 4198 35 14m191. 4!ngle leader RO3 Radtea puwa. nee 3' 05 17 anew angle leader RO Red Oek Owner nA. 4'98 10 .t alght lngle leader SO S wamp Ma e Oak d.rve tab 41313 14 * eight emg 44.d•r 803 Swamp While Oak 348 1 .0.ip 4u,g44e4r WB2 Bled Meow 24.094 2.5'88 18 simple angle leader WO W hite0 0k 2.0.e at. 41313 12 atra9hl angle leader VE3 V eby Forge Elm ura .eme0n V.v.,' TSB 12 atrel9M angle leader VE Valley Fags Bm u 7/. a.we very rep .' 4130 B straight angle leader Evergreen Tree s BR Sam F4 new same 888 BF8 Beam Fn m en e ar.. 8'99 43 BF ear n Fir u e. a 2.m.. 1200 15 8119 Bled7W Spruc e On. plep4.s e &BB 313 BH Bled It Spr uce Rea ales Arne 1298 44 Toni 581 Fr ont Yard Tree Planting Schedule KEY COM MON N AME B OT ANICAL N AME SIZE QTY. NOTES Trees AL Re dmond Under Rte modem s 'R edmond 25 .138 43 seelple angle l ead er AM Autumn Blaze Wale 3w + /rummy '4 0f ea.d 2 .528 19 Weight single leader HL SkyMelloneyLow et kerrm 801 327 2.528 38 strap a ngl e le ader PE Pr1ncebn EM W. wafting :le.asn 2828 54 e*si j.4 a ngle l ead er RM Red Mapl e 2.528 54 s taple angle Ri eder RO Red O.k Qom.. ru bn 25213 22 0 On eagle l ead er Toni 230 I her eby =MI 111 ell an, spe c5ca4nerr.pwwea prepared Dr nd my direct supa80on and Atl I em a duly rep le re l andscap e a ddle d und er to l ew4 tae of Minnesot a. Signed Dees 4810 Reglrts.dn 8 20144 REVISIONS BY 5/3/10: ree d sizes & tea quantities, base info 5/13/10: resod base info & tw moved trees 6/7/10: rev'd base info & lad moved trees 6/16/10: re*'d base info & iW moved trees 9/17/10, rev'd base info & trees to 61 new Sots U r7/ rA • U U O - C/) U � (1) 1.0 U Cid TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA 100 East Sec ond Street, Chaska, MN 55318 / (952)361-0644 LENNAR CORP . DRAWN TDW CHECKED TDW DATE 04/09/10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO. 5401-634 FILE: TREE_REPLACE MENT_PLAN SHEET TRP-1 SHEETS T ,04, S!IONWIL,H _-_--_— __ \r —L_ 25 0 25 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 1 I_ A 4,6C6 WO NOW'i3 eEF4hVNDa OYSOOi 6C'9�T.�� ND9;..�4'ib+Ina ,6 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 a CV CL w w w w C CO' w� w z_ z 4 4 J J 0 0 4 sr rpm-- cz.ol„ _ __16_--__y :rl�tiw4_:Fd1 rc 9ool I hereby wady T hl . ,e cetbn or rep ort ma prepar ed by me or nd myXr m direct euperNSon ende 1 aa duly Regis L andscape M41leect under Ve 1 th e of Minnesota. Signed: D ata 4P10 ReaOeaw s: 20144 4 REVISIO NS BY 5/3/10: rev'd sizes & base info 64/qu antities, 5/13/10: rev 'd base infra & trees 6/4/moved 6/7/10: re Vd base info & moved trees tW 6/16/10: re Vd base info & moved trees tW 9/17/10: re Jd base i nfo & tre es to fr new lots tW cn e� U 0 U 01 0 cr Z cts 1-1 100 East Second Street, Ch aska, MN 55318 / (952)361-0644 TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . DRAWN TDW CHECKED TDW DATE 04/09/10 AS SHOWN JOB NO. 5401-634 F LE: TREE_ REPL ACE ME NT PLA —_—. —_ SHEET TRP-2 OF SHEET " SCALE IN FEET L1E (9001) b :eo 5' S , $(al.'Ti6 .40 -i vena ., Moues" sssan_._-------t"""" .' .- tnl . en, rpecn calbn a s epal we e nd my dims a upend4o n e nd the, m" L an:imps Architect unarming. We of Mlr MS Signed: Oar 4-9-10 Reg5O aeo n 11 20144 REVISIONS 5/3/10: rev'd sires & qu an tities, base in fo 5/13/10: re v'd base info & moved bees 6/7/10: rev'd base info & moved trees 6/16/10: rev'd base info & mov ed bees 9/17/10: rev'd base info & tre es to fit new lots TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN W 1- o gLj w z U z z w w z 2 p ��-- w 2 DRAWN TDW BY tw tw tw tw tw 100 East Second Street, Chaska, MN 55318 / (952)361-0644 LENNAR CORP . CHECKED TDW DATE 04/09/10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO. 5401$34 FLE' TREE_REPL ACEME NT_PLAN SHEET TRP-3 SHEETS ) og J3 e 4 45 s 5 1ftq m I rg m to 2 • 2> 23 0 TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP. I { 61 6' 81Tral (Na) Norby & Associates Landscape Architects, Inc. 100 East Second Street, Chaska, MN 55318 / (952)361-0644 1 { Y C Hamel Community Pad, City of Medina 3200 Mill Drive PID 121-18-2344-0017 37.65ec(1,639,911 sf) MKBJAHerwig Address Unassigned PID 131-18-23-11-0006 5.11 ec (222,408 sf) U AC Johnson 8,M 4245 Bmckfo PID 131-18-23, m 0 z I V / REVISIONS BY 5/3/10: reV d sizes & iW quantities, base info • -737 ' 4 • ♦ 4 4 4 ♦ 50 25 0 25 50 100 4 ♦ 4 4 MATC ♦ 4 4 ♦ 4 ♦ ' ♦ , ' ' oo 0 o 0 c 0- 0 0 o 0 0 xa o ab o 0 00 0 n 0 0 c 0 coc Q o 0 o' 0 o 000 0 ,� LI CI_ 00 I— LL' w 0,�w W �� \a �. 0 n 0 0 z z c, 0 o c 0 o-,sm So 0 _ _ 4 Y- 0 0 0 , 0 o�, - 00 cp 0 • 6, 0 zt'44 c§D cJ o 0 I hereby mniry th.yyy%thl spmncmean a raper, w pI am a by ne my dma'mpaM'Ipn d ander M1 I ♦m m d uly my L andscape now. untla ne 1 me of Minnow. sine& 5/13/10: rev'd base Ink & iW moved bees 6/7/10: resit' base info & BA/ moved trees 6/16/10: rev'd base ink & BN moved trees --- — a— — w 9/17/10: info & rend base ink & � trees to fit new lots 04 U • • O Ucid 100 East Second Street, Chaska, MN 55318 / (952)361-0644 TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA 1 LENNAR C ORP . DR AWN TOW CHECKED TOW DATE 04/09/10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO. 5401{34 FILE: TREE_REPLACE ME NT_PLAN SHEET SCALE IN FEET Dat 4-0-10 Re4leeetlen k 20144 TRP-5 / SHEETS/ , -- --- RURAL- 24'SECT10Y1)5.?9 ROADWAY 1.05.65 RURAL- 24' 17986 o 0 N00°OQ'60"E 124.95, SOO°.10'00"E fl 3.84 • 0 0 0 000 X30 o& ofoN- 0 0 0 0 C --1 0 m 23 0 0 0 o0 •,:.,6_^': . 100i,.68 0 ti 0 D ?� 2 2 �r r m Om cn cn 2 I m m JJ -I —1 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 c 0c 0 0 TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA Norby & Associates Landscape Architects, Inc. Q5.! LENNAR CORP. 100 East Second Street, Chaska, MN 55318 / (952)361-0644 i \i . g4 Hg SAM 200 100 0 100 200 SCALE 04 FEET minta Raman Existing Tree NAVAJO HILLS o 0 g 0 0 Opp. O cf/ oi- $0 1 ADD T ON I . 0 I hereby oerllly .t - pmpamd by me r lamaDulyrp REVISIONS 5/3/10: reVd buffe r 5/13/10: re' d base info 6/07/10: reV d base info tw _adjustedtalea _ 6/16/10: reVd base info tw _. ee ste el tracts ------ -- ---- 9/17/10: reVd base info tw ste s --_-- -- © Lege. 9/18/10: add more evp. - tw an. vocal.. or r epo, was my direct super visio n and CO Landscape ad,M a undrlb e � dte or MImmte . Dore 4-8-10 ReplOrlm N 02144 ie•1 H1 8 U 0 O - m `'O Qi rao O CA Z c 100 East Second Street, Chaska, MN 55318 / (952)361-0644 BUFFER Y ARD PL ANTING PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . DR AWN TDW CHECKED TDW DATE 04/09/10 SCALE AS SH OWN JOB NO. 5401-634 FIE: PL ANTING_PLAN_100410 SHEET ...__ BP -1 SHEETS r • 111,06 ep SSr1CNIOOR:l@ N01. 0030.1T -1YBf4_ (P1\r Hunter Buffer Planting , 2 %Sca le:1"=50• 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET N011335 .0Z -1Vly1H V14 iV01; 5 50Nlr;1r'9 (02' Hunter Buffer Planting __—____ __—. —. ___ 50 25 0 25 50 100 2 Scale:1 " =50' SCALE IN FEET Pla nting Point Requirement .3 Opacity 276 points pe r 100' 25 fo ot Buffe r Width 2540 Total Fee t of Buffer Point Requirment = 7176 Poin ts Type Point Value Overst0y Tree 50 Tall Eve rgreen 50 Ureerstory Tree 15 b _ Tali Shrub 5 1 C)Ay 28 93 37 116 Total Butternut Rd NOIJ0 3S,60 -1Vls1H NC11035A E-11MICH N0LL330.92-1VHnH Points 1400 4850 555 580 7185 T ice \j{ur,_ f\ ., �y�� � 'tla — I/ZIYaFlafr_k_. .if►lateri �' a '�. ,•.. ..I ten•®'� TN %lig 'L. �i�_ LWA i. k L. f1 . V{aI // /0 011036.92 -mina 54OU33S .90100119 t I Hunter Ro ad Buffer Planting Schedule KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE OTY NOTES Trees AM &kern Blaze M aple Remy / nil :Mamma. 2-5' BB 5 straight single leader AL Redmo nd Linden 73ia americana •R stem 2 .5" BB 4 str aight single leader AS Quaking Aspen P opul us eemubides 2.5" BB 3 str aight single Wader HA H aticberry Cattle ac cide ntals 2.5" BB 3 straight single leader 112 Skyline Hon ayLoc uel Dled ale Mementos Van Uermra'Shy.' V/e' 2.9' BB 2 str aight single Wader PE Princ eto n Elm Uaa ue *memos Princeton' 2.5 ' BB 6 straight si g9 leader RR River Bi rch Betide nigre 10 .13E 1 n4A>a bm BM R ed Maple Acs e,bnan 2 .5" BB 2 straight ea gle leader RO R ed Oak o uerc u6 r ubl e 2.5 " BB 2 straight single leader Evergreen Trees BH Black Has Spruce Pic ea gl eam densel y 868 34 BF Belem Fir A lves be eame e 6' BB 11 NS N orw ay Spr uc e Pk em ebbs EBB 25 SS Serbian Spruce Pines m onk. 8' BB 23 Understory Trees A Jap ane se L8 80 Tina Sya gle retic ul ate 2 "88 9 str aight single leads PC Profusion Crab MMus 'Prolusion' 2" BB 9 straight single lead er RC Red Splendor Gab MMus Red Spl end or 2 "BB 6 str aight single lead er 50 S ervicebem/' Autumn Balanc e' 32 *e nmwr r e nta nn.re'Autumn &Va nce' 8' BB 6 multi -stem SC Spring Snow Crab MM us •Spd n9 3n0ut 2" BB 7 str aight single leads Shrubs BC Black Chokebe ny Annle melenocerpe Mate 38 " ht 22 R ant 6' O.C. FM Mead owlark Forsythia Forsythi a x'MeedmNelr' 38 " ht 24 Ram 7' O.C . LP D onald Wyma n Lilac Symgla pr ogenies 0o naid Wym an' 36 " ht 18 Re a 7' O.C . MV malice Vlbumurn Viburn um Wawa M ohic an' 36 "ht 24 Pl ant 7'0.C. RT Rad Twigged Dogwood Cornea esit ea Rak N' 36' ht 12 Rant 6' O .C. WH Wit& Hazel Hammes virgins., 36 " ht 16 Rant 8' O .C. I hereby malty .0154 pr epared by me or urd I .m. dulyleg law aimed: s P gedk•knwrep 0lne. dred.up. Mi n e nd We woo Ardraa 8 Locket* or Min at o . Doc 4 &10 Rapid/mean M 20144 REV ISIO NS BY 5/3/10: rev'd buffer _-plenlin 9pu80ffiy.: . 5/13/10: re v'd base in fo 6/07/10: res4d base info adjusted trees 6/16/10: ra sed base info _adjusted bees 9/17/10: rey'd base i nfo _asiu sted trees.__ . 9/18/10: add more a vg. 100 East Second Street, Chaska, MN 55318 / (952)361-0644 BUFFER YARD PLANTING PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP . CHECKED TOW DATE 04/09/10 SC ALE AS SHOWN J06 N O. 5401 .634 PLANTING PtAN_100410 SHEET BP -2 SHEETS ) 9 r 4 7 4 Scale:1"=50' 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET X7 1' 1 107 A 3M7 err •rAek �y f Al y n Muliti-Family & East Property Planting Schedule KEY COMM ON NAME BOTA NICAL NAME SIZE QTY. NOTES Tre es AL Redmond Linden ra ..ea..'A .n me 2.5' BB 1 straight si ngl e/add AS Oueking A spen Po pu lus tre m la rtn 2. 5' BB 1 straight single le ads BO Bo Oek Owmw maaacape 2.5' B8 6 alright si ngl e leader HA Hec kbsry ca. ocea n. 2. 5' BB 3 .Iraight single le ads 11 Skyline Hmeylmet near Mama r -.-mw' sl.'• 2.5'68 3 .freig ht si ngle lads - FT Princ almem u se ss ammo* ranom 2.5. BB 1 str aight si ngl e lads RB Row Brdu Sony. Non 10 BB 5 milt wean RO Re d 0* w awa ma 2.5 ' 8B 4 elr .igM si ngl e l ende r Ev ergreen Trees BH Blek Hills Spl ice Pkw Nuodre. 088 9 BF Be lem Fir Abw.bwsea BBB 7 NS Ramey *um P.w.M * BBB 13 55 Se rbia n Sp un P6 ® ma.a BBB 6 Understo ry Trees PC Cra b 604 7obwm' r BB 3 straight single lam* R0 ,profusion Re d Snlan derrl C WhoB.dSam AY 2 '86 2 etra.de aim* lam 513 Sarvlcebry Auerns& Saxe ' M*.ewared aenwa'.. vkumgram.' 8'B8 3 milt at= SC Senno Snow Crab Mho $ a4 So. 2. BB 4 sV6004 ei nde le ader Shrub se Bla ck Chcke any Am nia mei en ocerpe sea 36 ' M 13 Pl ant 60.0 FM Meadow lark Fo rsythe Forsyth e] x dleemwlrk' 36'1 3 Pl ant T 0.0 MV M ohican Vu.rnm Viburnum lantana 5bticsr 38.1 12 Fi ord roc. RT Re d Twigged Dogwmd Comu a S.C. Ret est 36 '1 14 Pl ant 6 O.C. WH WitchHael Hem emeb s v.ple ne 36 '1 3 Pla nt 8'00 MULTI -FAMILY BUFFER REQUIRMENT Planting Point Requirement .2 Opacity 158 poi nts per 100' 25 fo ot Buffer Width 910 Total Feet of Buffer Point Requirment = 1437 Points Type Point Value Qty_ Points Oversary Tree 50 1. 1 Tall Evergreen 50 15 J nd ersl nry Ire e 5 Tall Snr uh _- 5 _1 2 _ - E AST PR OPE RTY BUFFER REQUIRMENT Planting Point Requirement .3 Opacity 276 points per 100' 25 foot Buffer Width 700 Total Feet of Buffer Point Requirment = 1932 Points TypePoint Value Ov ers'.ory free 50 Tall Evergreen 50 Jnderstory Tree 15 1 all Shr ub Total Qty 14 20 30 Total - r 550 750 75 105 1480 Points 700 '000 '05 '50 1955 I her eby coney rd this prepar ed by me s under I am a duly regale awe an Spend: 0) an d supemdon end the Archite ct uder0e kem Y. REVISIONS BY 5/3/10: res'd buffer tw 5/13/10: read base info 6/07/10: rev'd base info 6/16/10: rev'd base info _adlust6A es 9/17/10: rev'd base info edlusted trees 9/18/10: add more evg . trees. lw tw tw tw tW 100 East Seco nd Street, Chaska, MN 55318 / (952)361-0644 BUFFER YARD PLANTING PLAN THE ENCLAVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA LENNAR CORP. DR AWN TDW CHECKED TOW DATE 04)09/10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO. 5401 .634 FLE: PLANTING PLAN 106410 SHEET D am 4810 Regla/m 4 20144 \ ‘_OF BP -3 SHEETS e 1 -HL or 1 -AL RO CK MULCH & POLY EDGER (TYP. ) 1TY 1 -NS PRIV ACY FENCE BY OTHERS 1-BH 1GA 1 -SD 2 -M S 1 -HA ROCK MULCH & POLY EDGER (TYP.) 4 -ET 1-SN 5 -MS 4 -M C 1 -HL or 1 -AL Planting Schedule Jefferson End Unit Only 3 -NS 1-SJ- 1-NS 3 -t -I 3 -NS 1-R M or 1-R O KEY COMMON NAM E B OTANICA L NAM E SIZE QTY. NOTES Trees AL Re dmo nd Linde n rtlie americans ' Retlno nd 2.5- BB 2 straight eingle leader OR HL Skyline HOneyLO oust Gkurta . eec e Ino a vr'monis Veyso le. 2.5' BB 1 sbaght 4ngle leader Evergreen Trees BH Black Hills Spruce kvaa pa,va dense r 6'85 1 Ornamental Trees HC Harve st Gold Crabapple Mews larpo ze ne 1.5' 58 1 sought single lea de r OR SC Spring Snow Crabapple Marn e Sprin g Snap' 1.5' 88 1 straight single leader De cidious Shrubs SN Su mmer Wine Nineberk R00raacerprarouu oaa sums Mo o' 55 pot 1 NS Neon Rash Spires So: wls4misa 'Ne on Flask' 45 pot 4 MS Ma gic Ca rpe t Spiro. SpPalmon k0 aaak tarps' 55 po t 7 Ev ergreen Shru bs HA HO krebkq Arbo rvime MO pma enrra 'Noh amr6 ' 54' BB 1 GA Tee ny Globe A morvites nee aodee sse Ts Fly CON, 57 pot 1 TV Taun ton Ye w run s mar ',Mo n" 45 put 1 Perennials SO Stella De Oro Deyliy M onona Wallopa ro ' 51 po t 1 H Frances Wilkens Ho sts H oss' F.ara 0 Weems ' 41 po t 3 MC Columbin e, McKena Hybrids Ap4005 WWI'. 51 pot 4 ET 'Big Sky Twilight' C00 0llo wer Erhke cesxag Skymlrphl' 41 po t 4 Section Ylew -A S or 1-JL 1 -A S or 1-JL H 4 3 -NS 1-SJ 1-SJ 1-SJ 1-SJ 1-SJ 1-SJ 1-SJ 1 -NS - 3-H C URB LINE ROCK M ULCH & POLY EDG ER (TYP. ) 5 -SP - 1 -DS 2 -Ii 3 -NS 1-R M OR 1-RO Planting Schedule Madison Interior Unit Only KEY COM MO N NAM E BOTA NICAL NAM E SIZE QTY. NOTES Trees RM Red Ma ple Ace "Mn m 2.5' BB 1 OR RO R ed O ak 000000 rubes 2.568 1 Orna me ntal Tree s JL Japanese Tres Lilco Syr inge re ficu lata 1. 5' BB 1 OR AS Au tumn Bnllence Serviceben y 4 esaMarx penrl500 Auluna Ne aps' a 813 1 Decidiou s Shrubs N5 Neon Flash Speer, Sp:etJav0ro Mal Fas t' 45 pot 4 Evergre en Shrubs SJ Se a Green Ju niper Aayerw dnmrw Se a Green ' 45 pot 1 DS Dwarf Globe Blue Spruce Ft. pama n. GM ae Oka.' 45 pot 1 Pere nnials H Fra nc es Wia ms Ho sts Dab Fiances W1/w138' 91 pot 4 SP P ape Empero r Sedum Sedan Purple Engm / 41 pot 5 -6-SP 1 -DS 2-H 3 -NS 1-RM or 1-RO General Notes 1 HL or 1 -AL OC K M ULCH & POLY EDGER (TYP.) 1TY 1 -NS PRIVACY FENCE BY O THERS 1 -HL or 1 -AL 1-BH 1GA 1SD 2 MS 1 -HA ROCK MULCH & POLY EDGER (TYP.) 4 -ET 1-SN 5 - MS 4 -M C Scal e: 1"=10'-0" 0 5 10 20 SCALE IN FEE T 1. Landscape Contra ctor shall visit th e sit e prior to submitting bid to bec ome f amiliar with site conditio ns. 2. It is the responsibility of the contractor to identify all underground cables, cond uits, wires, etc, on th e property. 3. No planting will be install ed until all grading an d construction has b een completed in immediat e area. 4. If th ere is a dis crepancy b etween the number of plants shown on the plan and the number of plants shown on the plant list, the n umber of plants shown on the plan takes prec edence. 5. All plants shall be of specim en quality. Plants shall have normal , well -de veloped branch systems, a vigourous fibrous root system; they shall be s ound, healthy. vigorous plants fr ee from defects, disfiguring knots, sunscald inj uries, abrasions of the bark, plant diseases, insect eggs, borers, and all forms of infestations. 6. Repair all damge to property from planting operations at no cost to the owner. 7. The Landscape Contractor shall replace at no charge, any tree, evergreen, or groundcover which fails to live thr ough the first catendaryearfrom the time of final acceptance by the owner . All plants shall be ali ve and in normal satisf actory growing condition at the end of the guarantee p eriod. 8. Three inch d eep shredded hardw ood bark mulch will be installed under all trees and shr ubs that are isol ated from ground cover areas and general foundati on plantings. 9. A three in ch layer of 1.5" dia. buff rock mul ch over l andsc ape we ed b arrier s shall be installed in all shrub and foundation areas. 10. Tree g uying in all areas shall be optional. The landsc ape contractor shall be r espo nsible for m ai ntaini ng tr eess in a straight upright conditi on for a peri od of twel ve months following install ation. 11 . All poly edger shall be cobra style vinyl edging or equal. 12 . All perennial/annual planting areas shall recieve a minimum of 8" depth of planting soil (1-1-1) mixture. 13. Wrapping material shall be first q uality, heavy, waterproof crepe paper m anufact ured for this purpose . Trees shall be wrapped pri or to 12/1 and removed after 5/1. 14. All plant locations, species, quantities and sizes subject to site conditions, soils and availability . 15 . Landscape Contractor to become familiar with and comply with all policies and procedures of Owners SWPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan). 16 . All shrubs to be installed a minimum distance of 24 " from the foundation of any building. L hoo ky certify n prepasd Mme*. Io na duly r ap a n, apee4kata n a noon was my dir e euperOa 01 a nd fat h and c qe AMA. u nd er the I Mlmeaq REVISIONS BY\ 0 � M� aal a) O - CA U PLI czt 1-4 100 East Seco nd Street, Chaska, MN 55318 / (952)361-0644 LENNAR CORP . DRAWN TDW CHECKED TDW DATE 04/09/10 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO. 5401.634 F LE: TREE_REPLACEMENT_PLAN SHEET Q1 Perenn ial Pla nting Detail NO T TO SCALE (2 Shrub Plan tin g De tail \ii ' NO T TO SCALE 3 Tree Planting Detail 1_, ITT T oSCAL`_ Dr s 40-1D Rap40Ypn a: 201x4 MFP-1 / s0F SHEE TS,/ s • • • r E LAND 1Jr PMN E5 7 J T 1 AREA1 — — — AREA 2( I -1 C. J ePL A V E ME DI NA LENNAR LENNAR CORPORATION 935 East Wayzata Boulevard Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Land Development Manager. Carole Toohey: 952-249-3012 SORB a SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 ❑Medium Density Residential (3.5-6.99 U/A) Gross 28.89 ac Wetland 3.54 ac Wetland Buffer 2.14 ac Conservation Area 0.00 ac Net 23.21 ac Guided: 81-162 Units Number of Units: 50 SF + 41 MF = 91 Units Net Density: 91/23.25 = 3.91 Units/Acre n Low Density Residential (2.0-3.49 U/A) II Gross' 44.69 ac Conservation (upland) 7.43 ac Wetland 5.89 ac Wetland Buffer 5.32 ac Net 26.05 ac Guided: 55-95 Units Number of Units: 65 SF + 0 MF = 65 Units Net Density: 65/26.04 = 2.50 Units/Acre 'Note: Gross = Area 2 * Land Outside MUSA =39.00+5.69= 44.69 as Conservation Area: Gross 11.29 ac Wetland 1.43 ac Wet Buffer 2.43 ac Upland 7.43 ac Overall Site: Guided: 136-257 Units Proposed:156 Units Overall Net Area: 49.26 ac Overall Net Density: 3.17 Units/Acre NORTH 1"=120' 22x34 1- REVISIONS BY PREPARE LAND USE PLAN NRH 09-15-10 1 —/\/— _ — — ENCLAVE PRELIMINARY#2MvgtENCLAVE2_LAND USE_PLAN.DWG t1U A All NPI1 AREA 1 AREA 2 EXISTING MUSA LINE PROPOSED MUSA LINE_J T ePLAVE MEDINA Existing - Rural Farmland Proposed - Residential Zone RI &R2 • Units: 6 Full Homesites 5 Partial Homesites N 04,00 LE N NAI LENNAR CORPORATION 935 East Wayzata Boulevard Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Land Development Manager. Carole Toohey: 952-249-3012 spa SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OS I. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 47&6000 CONSERVATION AREA: Wetland 1.43 ac Wet Buffer 2.43 ac Upland Land Swap 3.17 ac Addt7 Upland Inside MUSA 1.76 ac Upland Outside MUSA 2.50 ac Gross Area 11.29 ac OVERALL CONSERVATION AREA MUSA AMENDMENT AREA (3.17 ac) EXISTING MUSA LINE NORTH 1"=120' 22x34 1. REVISIONS BYE PREPARE MUSA AMENDMENT PLAN NRH 09-15-10 _ W:1Projectsl540 -634 ENCLAVE PRELIMINARY#2Wwg\ENCLAVE2_MUSA_PLAN.DWG z s PrZONINS PLAN T C= <- r'i AREA 1 AREA 2 Pi J C= CD T1 0 C= (: ) 1 POND,1 999.0 MEDINA Zoning District- R3 Gross 11.49 ac Wetland 2.62 ac Wet Buffer 1.28 ac Zoning District- R1 ® Gross 6.74 ac Wetland 0.00 ac Wet Buffer 0.00 ac Net 6.74 ac Rural Residential Gross 35.46 ac Wetland 23.14 ac Wet Buffer 3.25 ae Net 9.07 ac LENNAFt LENNAR CORPORATION 935 East Wayzata Boulevard Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Conservation Area Gross 11.29 ac Wetland 1.43 ac Wet Buffer 2.43 ac Net 7.43 ac 4 Land Development Manager. Carole Toohey: 952-249-3012 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952)47&8000 AREA 1 AREA 2 C= :1 r'i C- 5> :1 r'i C7 NORTH 1"=120' 22x34 REVISIONS BY PREPARE REZONING PLAN NRH 05-15-10 W 1Projecls\5401-634 ENCLA E PRELIMINARY#Z,dwg1ENCLAVE2_REZONING_PLAN.DWG " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " A vision becomes reality . For many years, the H ol asek pr operty has been c ontempl ated f or devel opment . N one of the pr op os ed plans s eemed to fit right f or the community of Medina. T oday, we are excited to pr op ose a plan that would pr ovide new housing types f or the City, with a plan that f oll ows the intent of the newly adopted Comprehensive Plan . The Enclave will provide affordable t ownhomes and a variety of single f amily h om es am ongst natural wetlands, existing city parks, trail c orrid ors and a wo oded c onservati on are a. Thoughtfully designed and crafted f or Medina by the Twin Cities' largest h omebuilder . Lennar Co rpo ration, founded in 1954, is one of the nation's leading h omebuild ers and provider of financial services for quality h omes f or all generatio ns and is currently building neighb orho ods and h omes in 17 states . In 2009, Lenn ar deliv ered m ore than 15,000 qu ality n ew homes to families acro ss America. Lennar's Minnesota division offers a wid e variety of single-family h omes, townho mes, a nd twinho mes that pr ovide the m ost desirable l ocati ons, o utstanding value, renowned quality and best amenities in 23 co mmunities lo cated in the Twin Cities metr op olitan area. LE N NAR We listened to bring you a better neighb orhood . Our Preliminary Plat submittal is a respo nse to all of the fe edb ack we receiv ed on our Conc ept Pl an at the neighborh ood meeting (1/28/10), Planning Commissio n (2/9/10) and City Co uncil (2/16/10). We heard that there ne ed ed to be more density on the n orth end of the pr operty. Our plan n ow shows 41 to wnho mes in the no rtheast co rner. This adds a third and different product pr oviding diversity . We were als o askedtohave transitional density through the pro perty. Our Concept Pla n starts with the t ownhomes (R3) in the n orth, moving ont o our smaller single f amily h omesites (R2), then o ur medium ho mesites (R2) a nd then we end with a larger 90' wide single family ho mesite (R1). We are not proposing large r homes for these, so there will be mo re space betwe en the ho mes. During the Co ncept Pla n review, we were asked to increa se the amount of trees we were saving. We increased the wooded co nservation a rea from 3.38 gr oss a cres (2.53 net) to 11.29 gross acres (7.43 net). This Preliminary Plat also impa cts two less wetlands than o ur o riginal Co ncept Plan. At the previous meetings, we were a lso requested to reduce the number of variances. All of our products mee t the de signated zo ning sta ndards. Our only variance request is to reduce the public right of way fro m 60' to 50' wide which ha s been previo usly a ppro ved in co mmunities like Bridgewater. As pa rt of o ur Prelimina ry Pla t application, we a re also applying fo r rezo ning a nd a Co mprehensive Plan amendment. We a re applying for rezoning because the current zo ning on the pro perty of PUD2 do es not match the newly a do pted Compre hensive Plan. O ur propo sa l of R3, R2 & R1 meets the different de nsity re quirements for the property and the desired transitional zo ning fo r the pro perty. We are a lso pro posing a slight amendment to the Co mprehensive Plan. We are requesting to ex tend the MUSA line so uth to add 3.17 net acres to the R1 zo ning area. The MUSA line fo llo ws the old floo dplain designa tio n per FEMA. Pernsteiner and Associates LLC & MFRA co nducted a study to find out what the true floo dline should be. Their research disco vered that the floo dpla in a rea is a ctually less than o riginally indicated, thus crea ting mo re buildable upland. This revised flo odplain ha s been reviewed a nd appro ved by FEMA. In return fo r adding 3. 17 net a cres to the MUSA, we are pro tecting 7. 43 net a cres of the wo oded and wetland area a lo ng the eastern edge of the property. Because of this swap, no a dditio nal units a re being a dded, and a significant number of trees and wetlands are being protected. YO I\M TED TO M ET MEDI\A'S \EWEST \E IG 3O RS. The Encl ave Community Summary Site Size: 109.08 acres Total number of housing units: 156 Housing styles (# of units): Single-family (1 15) Townhomes (41) Natural wetland area: 32 acres C onservati on area: 11.29 acres Water: City Waste Treatment: City sewer Natural Features: Mature trees and wetl ands Neighb orhood Added Features: Sidewalks, trails, neighborh ood parks, conservation area, profession al landscaping, traffic connectivity, and additional patrons f or Hamel businesses LENNAR P RESENTS TH PAGE 2 MEDINA ap•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " P11 PEZON ING PLAN TH C: _ 5> P1 C7 --1 c= (1) 0 TI 0 C- FT 1 C7 P1 AREA 1 ARE A 1 H MEDIN A Zoning District- R3 Gr oss 11.49 ac W etla nd 2 .62 ac W et Buffer 1.2S ae Net 7 .59 me Zoning District- R2 Gross 44 .06 ac Wetland 538 ac Wet Butler 3 .75 ac Zon in g District- R1 Gro ss 6. 74 ac Wetla nd 0. 00 ac Wet Bu ffer 0.00 se Ne t 6.74 ac Rural Reside ntial G ro ss 35.46 ac 1Wetand 23 .14 ac Wet sutfcr 3.25 ac Net 9.07 ac LENNAR LENNAR C ORPORATION 035 East Wayz ata tiotdevard Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 scq F ���� vx hf gs .��r�� Conservatio n Area Gross 11.29 ac Welland 1.43 se Wet Buffer 2.43 ac Net 7 .43 ac Land Developrae nt Manager. Carole Toohey: PV -249.3012 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SO UTH BROADW AY WAYZ AT A, MN . 55391 (652) 4766000 O 0 ,r  N () CL T; 1 N rl 011 () C7 AREA1 AREA " )> c 7 iii C7 IC)\ Q C: 5> ni C7 (: )> C7 C_7 --1 C) -7 NORTH 1' = 120' (�� 22x34 r( REVISIONS PREPARE REZONING PUN BY NRH 09.15.10 W:1Pr ojectsl4W14s34 ENCL A ,E P RELI MI NARYe2ldwxlt ENCLAVE2_REZ ONING_PU N.DWG " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " A wide variety of h omesites for a wider variety of h omeowners . The mixture of single-f amily h omes with many h omesite siz e opti ons and t ownh omes provid es homebuyers with a multitude of h ousing and aff ordability ch oices . Ho mesites specificati ons: Single-family homesites  90' wide 30 feet - Garage to R .O .W . setback 10/15 feet  Side yard setb ack 30 feet  Rear yard setback 1 1,000sf  Minimum h omesite area 40%  Maximum impervi ous c over age Single-family homesites  75' wide 30 feet - Garage to R.O.W. setback 10/15 feet  Side yard setback 25 feet  Rear yard setback 8,000sf  Minimum ho mesite area 50%  Max imum impervio us co verage Single -family ho mesites  65' wide 30 feet - G arage to R.O. W. setback 5/10 feet  Side yard setba ck 25 feet  Rear yard setback 8,000sf  Minimum ho mesite a rea 50%  Maximum imperv io us co verage To wnho me ho mesites 25 feet - Garage to private street 40 feet  Garage to R. O. W. setba ck 30 feet  Minimum setback between buildings 8,750 sf  Minimum a rea per unit 50%  Max imum impervio us co vera ge Easy access. Easy living " The Enclave is lo cated in the heart of Medina , MN a lo ng Hunter Drive so uth of Hamel Road and no rth of Medina Ro ad. Surro unding land uses include residential develo pment of varying densities . Adjacent to the east is the Hamel Community Park and to the west is the Hamel Lions Park. The uptown Hamel business district is within wa lking dista nce fro m The Enclave. C ontinuing a tradition of fine educati on. The Enclave is l oc ated within Independent Sch ool District #284 th at serves Wayzata, Medina, Corc oran, Medicine L ak e, Minn etonk a, Oron o, Plymouth and Maple Gr ove. Children in th e public scho ol system fr om The Enclave will attend Greenwood Element ary Sch ool, Way zata West Middle Sch ool, and Way zata High Scho ol. Roll,nq Geer Cpuvir, fl 4 C.R d24 Haft, Rd 0p 7 u " "t"i+a Ra iek," 1) e n14 Co Rd dR Ca Rd 24 A s soma Was Ra r" " 180 , 04 Cane Old Racgwd Rd Z Z i6a��M.ry Pan Huron 4,5 c l? Coarse ,aa�4 5.4*.art ar a� ar a..',+ 0 A C, Ave 4 Plymouth The Enclave's homeowners asso ciatio n  clean, green and pristine. A master ho meo wners asso ciatio n for The Enclav e will be established to mainta in the o pen spa ce a nd co mmunity monuments. A sub -asso ciation will be cre ated to mana ge the ma intenance of the co mmo n ele ments within the to wnho me are a. The single family asso ciatio n will include pro fessio nal management, grass mowing, a nd park maintena nce. The to wnhome a sso ciatio n will include professio nal management, grass mo wing, snow plo wing, a nd ex terio r upkeep of the buildings. Ho meo wners a sso ciation do cuments will be submitted with Final Pla nned Deve lo pment Applica tio n materia ls. O wners of detached single- family ho mes will be respo nsible fo r their o wn upkeep and ma intenance subject to city o rdinance a nd architectural co ntrols established within the master asso cia tio n. YO J'RE I\VIT D TO MEET MEDI\A'S \EW EST \ =1G 3ORS. a etqa 1, vo ir c �_ LENNAR PRESS .00 o 0 I hnoa apcala licer 0 - St Pal e 0 SAGE " v '1C3W /1119111iS UMW. • • ft • • • • " " " The Enclave's features. " While most of the site will be restored with ecol ogic al function in mind, areas of form al " landscaping and am eniti es will complement the natural a esthetic beauty of The Enclave. " The Enclave resid ents will embr ace an extensive sidewalk and trail plan of dedic ated " wa lkways th at connect to Hamel Community Park, H amel Lion's Park and local businesses. Attractive themed c ommunity m onuments and signage will c ompliment the architectural " fe atures within the neighborho od . " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " With o ver 40 acres of n atur al wetlands, po nds, and mature tree area s, residents will enjoy the undisturbed natural beauty and wildlife features that already exist. Heavily landscaped berms will be used to buffer areas along Hunter Drive. *1="1"1"... ars -"air ,a Themed e ntry monuments and complimentary streetscape feature s thro ugho ut The Enclave. Mutt ple area designati ons will pr ovide a venue for residents to enjoy natural amenities . Ov er 30 acres of n atural w etland are a. Signage, lighting and m ailbo xes compliment streetscape features thr oughout The Enclave . The enclave featur es many natural presepvati on areas . PAC E MEDINA " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " The Enclave's Everything's lncluded� H omes. " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Introducing the PowerSmart Home by Lenn ar. " Lennar is also pro ud to introduce PowerSmart to The Enclave . The Lenn ar PowerSmart home is a green ho me with a impressive Department of Energy "EnergySmart H ome " Sca le " Rating to show ho meowners ho w efficient their home really is. " It means tha t while the industry standard is to meet a code minimum, th e Lennar " Po werSmart ho me exceeds it with all of these energy efficient fe atures: " " ENERGY STAR� Qualified " " Eco valuatio nsM Pla n Review " Tight Constructio n " " Impro ve d Therma l Systems " " Sea led Ducts " " Low -E Windo ws " Right -Sized HVAC " " Internal Mo isture Ma na gement " " Fresh Air Ventilatio n No w it's easy to see why Po we rSma rt will be included in the ho mes at The Enclave that will save mo ney, energy and the environment. " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " An attr active streetscap e will be maintained thr ough the inc orp oration of a v ariety of elevati ons, materials, c ol or packages and architectural c oven ants . E ach h ome plan provides multiple elevations, different accent materials and co ordinated exterior co lo r package ch oices f or h ome owners to eliminate the chances of a h ome e xteri or duplication. Every Lennar home at The Encl ave will include the "Everything's IncIuded" � Homes amenity p ackage . Lenna r include s the most desired amenities in the price of the ho me that may typically be considered "upgra des" by o ther homebuilders . THAT'S THE sr OF LENNAR The power to save money, to save energy, to sa ve the environment. powers YO 'RE \V Tart by LENNAR' TEDTOM ET MED N A'S NE li-H FIRST FLOOR PLA N SECO ND FLOOR PLAN MEDIN A PACE " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " YOL L Perfect f or first-time hom ebuy ers, L enn ar's C oloni al Patriot Townh omes offer convenience and outstanding value in a quality built mainten ance -fre e home. These homes feature gourmet kitchen, large great room, firepl ace, sec ond level laundry and open l oft area . This th oughtfully designed array of r ow -style townh omes feature windows and access in the front and back of th e each h ome . Hom e Summ ary: Styl e: Two-story r ow -style t ownh omes Homesit e width: n/a Features: 3 BR, 3 BA, 2 -Car Gar age Size: 1,700-1,900 finished square feet Base price estimate: Mid $200's Typical homeown er: First-tim e h om ebuyers ark r roi -r��i V t; .E .,.. ..<p E�� rK i�� ire c, hi."'II.'" 4x rci III 111110116111 ,111i Landmark Series Single -Family Homes Lenna r's La ndma rk Series single-family homes are creatively designed to ma ximi ze space and functi onali while offering an incre dible va lue fo r homeowners. A wide variety of houseplans and elevations will pro vide fantastic curb appea l while preserving the o pen space and natural amenities that The encl ave offers. Homesites will o ffer an asso rtment of walk -out, look -out and flat homesites with opp ortunities for ho meo wners to finish the lower level and max imiz e the living a rea of th e L andm ark Series . Home Su mmary: Style: Two-story single-family ho mes with basement Homesite width: 65 feet Features: 4 BR, 3 BA, 3 -Car Gara ge Size : 2,200-2,800 finished square feet Base price estimate: Mid $400's Typical homeowne r: Young fa milies _J \A'S N "WEST \E G 30 RS. LENNAIR� Classic Heartland Series Single -Family H omes Lennar's p opular American He artland Series offers a wid e v ari ety of house plans for t oday's gr owing families . These h omes include l arge open living space ar eas on the main le vel, master suite, cr aft room, and three car gar age . H ome owners can finish the l ower level to increase their living area to accommodate larger families . Large hom esites will pr ovid e ample area f or landscaping and pr eserv e op en sp ace viewing of the natur al surr oundings The encl av e offers . Home Summary: Style: Two-story single-family homes with basement Hom esit e width: 90 feet and 75 feet F eat ur es: 5 BR, 4 BA, 3 -Car Garage Si ze: 2,600-3,300 finished square feet Base price estimat e: Mid $500's Typical homeowner: Mov e -up growing families ORES=\TS TH C E MEDI NA PACE 9 " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Wetlands impact. On 2/1/2007 a TEP panel and The City of Medina appr oved the wetland delineations c onducted by Svob od a Ecological Services (SER). On 5/25/10 there was a site w alk with John Smyth to update the delineati on. Lennar h as submitted a wetl and applic ati on which is reviewed by the TEP. Our plan is pr op osing .39 acre (17,050 square feet) of wetl and imp acts .The mitigation will be made up with bank credits or offsite mitigati on . Tree preservati on impact . Site planning with considerati on of the existing features has all owed The Enclave to ha ve as little imp act on trees as feasible, while still meeting the required density. City of Medina's ordinance all ows for the rem oval of trees of up to 15% bef ore mitigati on is required. Develo pment of the site will require 22 .47% tree rem oval. Lennar will be pl anting trees in a m anner typic al f or residential develo pment highlighted by upgr aded buffering along Hunter Drive. Water quality impact . Water quality will be managed through the incorporati on of on- site p onding and other appr opriate er osi on c ontr ol me asures . Lenna r is co mmitted to fo llo wing stormwater p olicies enacted by the city and the Minnesot a P olluti on C ontrol Ass ociati on (MPCA). Park dedica tion. The o verall co nservatio n area is 11. 29 gross acres (7.43 net). 3.17 net acres is f or the MUSA swap . We are requesting park dedica tion for the ba lance of 4. 26 aces and any public tr ails. Th e park benefit of this area is the preserv ati on of a natural stand of trees. This area also pro vides a co nnectio n to two city p arks. A grand entrance. Mo numents identifying The Enclav e will be lo cated at the neighb orh ood entrance al ong Hunter Drive. The m onuments and the surrounding area will be enhanced with shrubs, perennial plantings and tree pl antings to c ompliment the natural amenities that The Enclave o ffers. All streets will feature coo rdinated deco ra tive street lights, mailb oxes and street signs unique to the neighb orh ood. Constructio n process, phasing and timing. Like all new co mmunities of this size, The Enclave will take multiple years before all of the h omes are s old and built . Tentatively, co nstruction phase o ne will start at the intersectio n of Hunter Drive a nd Red Fox Trail. Estima ted constructio n schedule : 2011  Phase O ne: 25 ho mesites 2014  Phase F our: 27 h omesites 2012  Phase Two : 43 ho mesites 2015  Phase Five: 41 h omesites 2013  Pha se Three: 20 ho mesites Due to the vo latility of to day's eco no my and housing market it is very difficult to predict accurate constructi on phasing. Critical timing and phase siz es will ultimately be dictated by market co nditions a nd Lennar's a bility to sell thr ough finished h omesites. The Enclave is ready fo r Medina. Lennar has a lo ng histo ry of building successful communities in the City of Medina under the previous homebuilder names of Orrin Tho mpso n Ho mes and Lundgren Bro s. Constructio n. The tradition of success will co ntinue with The Enclave and the many benefits this neighborhoo d o ffers including: Unique Ho using Dive rsity  Affordability, ho me styles, architecture, and family types. Preserved Natural Amenities  Wetla nds, po nds, trees and o pen spaces. Enhanced Enviro nment  Thro ugh o pen space preservation and Po werSmart building practices. Adding New Residents  To co mpliment the neighbo rs of Medina and further gro wth of the Uptown redevelo pment area. Sta bility  Lennar is o ne of America's finest ho me builders. Lennar is genuinely e xcited and is lo oking fo rward to wo rking with Medina to bring a new neighbo rhoo d to their co mmunity. YO .,' R E NV TE DTOME ET M_ DI\A'S \EWEST \EIG 3O RS. Entry Monumentation LENNAR � MEDI NA PAGE E " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " PflANS PLAN T H PHASE 1: Areas: Gros s 10. 00 ac Wetland 0.92 ac Wet Buffer 0.72 ac Net 8.36 ac 25 - 65' Single -Family Lots PIIASE 2 OVERALL AREA: Areas : Gross 13. 21 ac Wetland 0. 07 ac Wet. Bu ffer 0.39 ac Ne t 12. 75 ac 26 - 65' Single ramify Lots 17 - 75' Single Family Lots 43 - To tal Single Family Lots PHASE 3: Areas: Gross Wetland Wet. Buffer Net 16. 03 ac 4. 4U ac 2.59 ac ----`` 9.04 ac 05 - 65' Single Family Lots 11 - 75' Single Family Lots 04 - 90' Sirgle Family LotS 20 - To tal Single Famly Lots AREA I AREA 2 PHASE 4 OVERA LL AREA: Areas: Gross 11.56 ac Wetland 0.00 ac Wet. Buffer 0.04 ac Net 11. 52 ac 17 - 75' Single Family Lots 10 - 90' Single Family Lots 27 - Total Single Family Lots SOUTH AREA: Areas: G ross Wetland Wet. Butler Net  u 0 35.46 ac 23,14 ac 3. 25 ac 9. 07 ac MLD1NA " �� LENNAR0. LENNAR CORP ORATION 935 East Wayzata B oulevard Wayzata, Min nes ota 66391 cEas Sr., 1 r err 1) Land Development Manager. Carole Toohey: 952-249-3012 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH B ROADWAY WAYZ ATA. MN. 56391 (95214768000 AREA2 PH ASE 5: Are as: Gr oss 11.49 ac Wetla nd 2.62 ac Wet B uff er 1.28 ac Net 7.59 ac 41 - Mull -Family Lots Q " 0 C ONSERVATION AREA OVER ALL. Ar ea s. Gro ss 11.29 ac Wetl and 1.43 at Wet Buff er 2.43 ac Net 7.43 se NORTH 1 "=120' 22x34 REVISIONS REVISIONS BY PREPA RE PHASING PLAN NRH 09-1610  ---- W:1Prq.cISW01 .634 ENCLAVE PRELIMINA RYN210wy1ENClA VE2_PHASING_PLAN.DW G " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • Streetscape view fr om Hunters Dri ve YO 'RE \VIT DTOM ET M EDI\A'S EWEST EIGH3ORS. LENNAR R. E S T S T N MEDINA FAG L " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " . " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " YO E I\ VITE The homes of The Enclave . D TO MEET MEDI\A'S \EWEST EIG B O RS. LENNAR P ES \T S TH MEDI NA PA GL " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Classic Heartland Series Plan N ame: Weston Finished Sq . Ft .: 2383 Bedrooms & Baths: 4/4 YO ..,'RE I\VIT=D TO ME ET MED BO RS Main Leve Lower Leve LENNAR P RESE\TS TH " " MEDI NA " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Classic Heartland Series �� Plan Name: The Addis on " Finished Sq. Ft.: 2710 " Bedrooms & Baths: 4/3 " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " YO .,'R= \VT " " not be used to determine the Artist rendering only. Lennar reserves the right to make changes without prior notice. Stated dimensio ns and square foo tage are appro ximate and should actual size of the home. Lennar and the Lennar logo are registered service marks of Lennar and/or its subsidiaries. 5/10 ED =Ei iV\ED \A'S EW EST NE GHBO RS. . Great Room 17'-6" X 15'-0 " I I I I I I Dining Room 11 12'-6 " X 10'-6" 1 Study 10'-0" X 10'-6 " Owner's Suite 15'-6" X 17'-0" Bedr oom 13'-0" X 13'-0" LENNAR F oyer Kitchen 13'-0 " X 12'-0" Porch ESE\ Pwdr Rm r TS TH Mud Room r 1 Owner"s Closet Bedr oom 11'-6 " X 11'-6 " Bedroom 15'-0" x 11'-0" Garage 31-6" X 21'-6" r ti Clst 1 MINA " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Cl assic Heartland Series Plan Name: The Auburn Finished Sq. Ft.: 2858 Bedrooms & Baths: 4/3 YOJ'RE I\VITED TO MEET MEDI\A'S \EWEST \ EIG 3ORS. Main Level Great Ro om 22'0' X 15 '3" St udy N ook 11 '4% 15'-5 " Foyer Porch Dining Room r Kitchen 11'4 X13, 0. Island Garage /Vb . 21" b" Upper Level ��r Clst Master Bedroom lr-rx ls'-c Bath Master Bath Laundry Clst 7 LENNAR� Bedroom 2 11.-6.1( 10 ,1 r Bedr oom 4 1 P4x10, Clst B edroom 3 n'rsur D ESE\TS T AV E " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Classic Heartland Plan Name: The Lansing Finished Sq. Ft.: 2956 Bedroo ms & Baths: 4/3 YOUR Artist rendering o nly. Lennar reserves the right to make changes without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are appro ximate and should no t be used to determine the actual size of the ho me. Lennar and the Lennar lo go are registered service marks of Lennar and/o r its subsidiaries. 5/10 NV TED TO M ET MEDI\A'S NEW EST \EIG BOBS. S " eries Kitchen 10.-8.%15 .-1. Nook Great Room Dining Room 16-O %10'-10 ' Study Retreat Master B edr oom Living Room 1 JL W D Laundry /Craft 0 11 Bath u Bedroom 2 13'-5.'511' 5" Clst LENNAR F Bedroom 3 RES Clst 11 Master Bath Clst Garage 00 Closet Bedroom 4 \TS TH :;c MI5] NA " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " YO Classic Heartland Series Plan Name: The Monticell o Finished Sq. Ft.: 3075 Bedrooms & Baths: 4/4 RE I\VIT DTOME ET M DI\A'S \EW EST \EIG 3O RS. LENNAR � Main Level Kitchen Upper Level RES ME DI NA 1 " Classic Heartland Series Plan Name: Waverly II Finished Sq. Ft.: 3080 Bedrooms & Baths: 4/3 YO..,`RE INVITED TO MEET MEDINA'S NEIL H3ORS. Main Level Owm 's Su* 10'0's 1S -0' l Great Room 17'-0 ' s 17'O' Ooset Cl oset 3/4 Bedroom s F oref G oaoge Upper Leve LENNAR® Kech en 10l -6's 21'0. a0ngArco 13'-0"s21 D' 29 ,6 's 21 '6. -RESENTS TH PAGE 19 Mt 01 NA " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Cl assic Heartland Series Plan Name: The Springdale Finished Sq. Ft.: 3340 Bedrooms & Baths: 4/4 YO J'RE I\VITED TO MEET MED \A'S \ EW EST \EIG 3ORS. rp to: Kitchen 1 d'Y11'-8 Living R oom 11,1 1 174 UP Foyer Main Level P orch Great Room1s Study 134%11'6' Bath Mud Roan Clst Dining Room 4,111, r Garage 3116 1X 2r-6 Upper Level Master Bedr oom 114[1.',5' lau ndry � 01 Master Bath Clst r 1 Open Bel ow 17,01Y 124 LENNAR Bedr oom 2 12.-2 " 215" 4. Clst Bath L oft lraa-r 1 Bath B edroom 3 11 '-1P Y 12'2 Bedroom 4 11' -0113' -10' Clst Clst PA CE =SE\TS TH �LAVE 2n ME DI NA " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " YO J' Classic Heartland Series Plan Name: The Sterling Finished Sq. Ft.: 3416 Bedrooms & Baths: 4/4 \V T D TO MEET M=DI\A'S \EWEST \EIG 3ORS. Own er's Suit e 17'-0" x 14'-0� Main Leve Study 13'-0" x 11'-6 " Upper Leve Bedr oom 13'-0"x 13'-0" Great Room 15'-6" x 19'-0" Amid Porch Bedroom 13'-0 " x 13'-0" LENNAIR � Dining Are a 12'-0� x 15'-0 " Garage Kitchen 11'$" x 15'-0" ss ._ Bedroom 14'-0 " x 12'-6 " L oft 1 1 '-6" x 21 '-6" ESE\TS TH J PAGE 21 " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Plan Name: Fit zgerald Finished Sq. Ft.: 1958 Bedrooms & Baths: 3/3 "\L Landmark Series r�� A: NC \ An - cm I fs, I E'viES! i\ F CHBO RS. r' Main Level Dinette 9'-0" x 9'-3" Family R oom 15'-0" x 15'-0" Pwd P orch Kitchen 1 1'-8" x 10'-0" ;; Laundry Study 9'-10" x 11'-4" Foyer LENNAR � F Mud Garage I r I I I I I I Upper Level RESE\TS TH MEDINA PACE 22 " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Plan Name: Pillsbury Finished Sq. Ft.: 2190 Bedrooms & Baths: 4/3 Lam` Landmark Series Family R oom 15'-0 ' x 15'6" Main Level Dinette 10' 6" x 15'-0" Kitchen 9' -0" x 1 1'-0 ' Flex Room 11'-0' x 12'6 " P orch LENNAR Owner's Suite 15'-0" x 15'-0" ES Garoge Foyer Upper Level Owner's Bath 1 Clst " B edr oom 10'-0" x 12'-0 " \TS TK Mud R oom Bedro om 1 1 '-0" x 13'-6" Main Bath Bedroom 11'-0" x 12'-0" E PACE 23 .••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Plan Name: Sinclair Finished Sq. Ft.: 2405 Bedrooms & Baths: 4/3 L_ I V1'LL . Landmark Series Main Level F amily R oom 15'-4" x 15'-6" Study 10'-4" x 11,3" 3" P orch B edr oom 3 1 1 '- 4 "x l 1 '- 2" Linen Bedro om 4 1 O'- 4"x 1 1 '- 4" LENNAFI� F Din ette 10'-' x 14'-10 " Powder Ro om Foyer Optional 3rd Stall Garage Kitchen x 12'-10" Mud ..I Room Pantry L Upper Level Garage Owner's Suite 15'- 4"x14'-10" M ain B ath Loundry/Cr aff Room RESE\TS TH 1J Owner's Bath Owner's Cl oset ME DI NA PACE 24 " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Plan Name: St . Croix Finished Sq. Ft.: 2719 Be drooms & Baths: 4/3 1 111-111:1-1- -11 1 L andmark Series Main Level 1 1 Family R oom 14'-6 " x 17'-6" Dining Room 12'-0" x 11 '-0 " E Living Ro om 11'-0" x 11'-0" F oyer rrThl Porch r Kitchen 1 7-6" x 7'-6 " Din ette 14'-6" x 9'16" Garage 1 Upper Level Bedroom L oft 10'-0 " x 1 1'-0 " ' 1 1'-0" x 14'-6" Main Bath t Bedr oom 12'-6" x 1 1 '-6" Closet Cl os et LENNAIR � F Bedro om 12'-6" x 11'-6" ESE Owner's Suite 14'-0" x 14'-0" 111 Own er's both Owner's Cl oset Z \TS TH MEDIN A " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Colonial Manor Patriot Series Plan Name: Jefferson Finished Sq. Ft.: 191 1 Bedrooms & Baths: 3/3 YO 'RE I\VIT DTOM ET M DI\A'S \EW EST \ EG 30 RS. Main Level LENNAR Upper Level RESE\TS TH ME DNA PAGE " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Colonial Manor Patriot Series Plan Name: Madison Finished Sq . Ft .: 1778 Bedrooms & Baths: 3/3 YOJ EIINV TED TO ME ET MEDI\A'S \EWEST \EIG 3ORS. ob Main Level PATIO KITCHEN 10 -0x15-0 POR CH DININ G ROO M 5-0x150 GREAT ROOM 1T -0x15-0 GARAGE m lyph LENNAR Upper Level PAGE 27 " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " -4 - i' cIp _b - in PATIO - L KITCHEN DINING CLST. FOYER PWDR 1-1- I I LI I I I Colonial Manor Patriot Series Colonial Manor Patriot Garage betail YO E V IT GREAT ROOM 17'6" �%� ARA D TO MEET MEDI\A'S \EWEST EIG 3 O RS. LENNAR ��< Building Height 26' ESE\TS THE CLAY MEDI NA PAGE 28 " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " LLJ (fl O < CN CL .-1-J (clita) U 5 H 0 U N cD W 0 0._ O 0 0 0 V 1 LT _T erg poi! dl�m 1043.4 x / �/433 643 ;- 1 `:wQa;� c ' \r \\ r- -41405.0 mo\ 1 �� \-100V1 x 1011.5 b % 1012.0 1014. 101L) • 012.5 F-- x 1013.0 E--••— x 1013.E i� STA: 1+65.31 oca I�r �N x 1012.0 IrdII-0 \ / ,x 1007.0 �_ \# 1009. 49/��\ 1+,e.1',s .> ` / `r-- 20 /,-r. i \\\\ ,..,...?:4 L Z1 i� 22 / ��! `, -7 P� I.J.. it (. �qy� / . �L."'o'; ! ! , ►• % r • I . ! _+ rIflnad 25 1 + 97 x 1012.7 1010.0 F"'— x1011.0 x 1009.0 7'1• 1-1 ,,, . ,,.4 1�ti �► _ ,, ,,,,® 101`;1`, ® IZI 275 LI -SILT (after) , W STA: 3.1 mil 11 • 1( _ 40 _ "" /` 01 100.01 f— x%11.0 %%ft.' / LLJ CI) LLJ 0 0 LLJ I I I W \VIT D TO MEET w ry 13 0 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••. " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Building Materials Classic Heartland Series " LP SmartSide Hard Siding tau a sides) " LP SmartSide Hard Shakes (per elevation) " Batten Board (per elevati on) " Sto ne/Brick Accents (per ele vation) " Architectural Shingles " Stylized Garage Doors Colonial Manor Patriot Series " Vinyl Lap Siding " Vinyl Shakes " Architectural Shingles " Stylized Garage Doors " Stone/Brick Accents YOU' E MITE D TO M ET M DI\ A'S E W ES T EIG 3 ORS. Landmark Series " LP SmartSide Hard Siding (front) " LP SmartSide Hard Shakes (per elevation) " Batten Board (per elevation) " Vinyl Siding Sides And Rear " Stone/Brick Accents (per " Architectur al Shingles LENNAR elev ati on) RESENTS TH MEDI NA "