HomeMy Public PortalAbout01-12-2010MEDINA
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 2010
7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL (2052 County Road 24)
1. Ca11 to Order
2. Public Comments on items not on the agenda
3. Update from City Council proceedings
4. Planning Department Report
5. Approval of November 10, 2009 Planning Commission minutes
6. Public Hearing — Three Rivers Park District - Baker Near -Wilderness
Settlement - 4001 County Road 24 (PID #20-118-23-21-0003) —
Conditional Use Permit Amendment to construct an office building.
7. Public Hearing — Public Hearing — Ordinance Amendment —
Chapter 8, Section 835 of the City Code regarding the Rural
Commercial Holding zoning district and regulations for property
which have been identified for commercial or business development
in the 2010-2030 Comprehensive Plan but for which sewer and water
infrastructure will not be available until a future date.
8. City Council Meeting Schedule
9. Election of 2010 Planning Commission Chair
10.Election of 2010 Planning Commission Vice Chair
1.1.Adjourn
POSTED IN CITY HALL JANUARY 5, 2010
Updated January 8, 2010
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner
DATE: January 8, 2010
MEETING: January 12, 2010 Planning Commission
SUBJ: 2010 Administrative Items
2010 Elections for Chair and Vice Chair
The Planning Commission will elect its Chair and Vice Chair for 2010 at next week's meeting,
as is required within the Planning Commission
Staff is recommending holding the election at the end of the meeting since there are two Public
Hearings scheduled. If the Planning Commission disagrees with this approach, feel free to move
to amend the Agenda when the meeting is called to order.
If anyone has nominations prior to the meeting, please email them to me at
dusty.finke u,ci.medina.mn.us There will be time at the meeting to nominate people as well.
Staff will coordinate the election on Tuesday evening
Updated Zoning Code Books
The City adopted many amendments to Chapter 8 of the City Code (Zoning Regulations) over
the past year. If any Commissioners have an old Code Book that you would like updated, please
bring it to the January 12 meeting. Staff will update the relevant sections and return it to you for
the February meeting.
2010 Administrative Items Page 1 of 1 January 12, 2010
(Officer Elections, New Code Books) Planning Commission Meeting
Agenda Item: 3
PC Update: January 2010 from Liz Weir
The Council:
- heard a report from Mark Schiffman of Embrace Open Space on the economic
benefits of planning open space into city development;
gave approval to Open Systems International to access the Minneapolis Economic
Development Common Bond Fund program in order to help the growing software
company relocate to Medina. OSI produces energy related software and is
expanding into Medina. The Common Bond Fund is available at no cost to the
City.
denied a driveway width waiver to a resident, whose builder constructed his
driveway eight feet wider than city code and his lot plans allow;
approved a resolution formally adopting Medina's 2030 Comprehensive Plan;
supported a grant application for a Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources
Clean Water Fund Grant to re -meander a creek and enlarge a wetland that are
common to Loretto and to Medina;
approved City Financial Management Policies;
allowed a payment plan to help residents to make payments on outstanding
deferred assessment balances owed to the city;
heard a report from County Sheriff Rich Stanek, who reported lower violent crime
rates in the county and thanked Medina Police Chief Ed Belland for his
department's excellent work with the West Metro Drug Task Force;
heard public comment on a 1 percent proposed 1010 tax levy increase and
approved the increase. The levy includes interest on lease purchase bonds for
equipment that were approved last year to make a total of a 1.15 levy increase;
approved a revised Environmental Fund purpose statement that directs
expenditure more directly to support environmental issues than before;
took comment from the public and discussed the proposed new public works
facility that has been researched and discussed for seven years. The present
building is undersized, does not meet OSHA standards for safety and air quality
and requires off-season, expensive equipment to be stored outside. Ehlers
Consultants presented possible interest rate impacts from a Capital Improvement
Bond to fund the proposed $6.5 million building over 20 years. Council remains
cautious moving forward with this plan, but directed staff to continue pursuing the
purchase of land from Hennepin County on their Public Works site for the future
facility, and to look into the feasibility of adding on to and remodeling the present
public works building. Council also directed staff to prepare a draft RFP for
architectural and project management services;
heard a presentation from the Hamel and Loretto fire chiefs, regarding their
ongoing progress towards a possible merging the two fire departments;
approved a one year Fire Contract Agreement with Corcoran and the Hamel Fire
Department for fire protection;
approved the appointment of John Gleason, a part-time snow plough driver to
replace the fulltime position of Bob Dressel, who retired after 34 years of service
to Medina;
reviewed the Mixed Use ordinance and directed consultants NAC included: 1.
increase height to three stories for residential above commercial; 2. increase the
allowed size of nursing homes etc. as a conditional use; 3. allow residential
facilities serving six or fewer clients as a permitted use in singe family residential
areas in order to be consistent with state statutes; 4. change the term "bonus
density" to "additional density" that allows densities beyond five residential units
per acre and up seven units per acre; 5. make external building materials for
institutional uses in the MU District conform to other commercial use materials;
6. add a Places of Assembly section so that religious institutions are not given
preferential treatment; 7. increase to a maximum 60,000 sq. ft. for warehousing,
wholesaling and distributors as a conditional use. The Council approved the
amended MU District ordinance at the January 5th meeting;
granted a wetland setback variance for a small property in the Rural Residential
that is surrounded by wetlands and has a failing system;
approved a uniform design for park signs throughout the city;
approved a $100,000 grant from the Hennepin Youth Sports Program initiative to
help fund the completion of the Field House in Hamel legion Park;
- denied a resident's appeal to allow two, 4' X 4' already -constructed, stone
monuments to stay in the City Right of Way of a public street;
supported a DNR Community Conservation Assistance grant application to help
prepare a Conservation Design/Open Space ordinance;
- approved Kent Williams, Kathleen Martin and John Anderson to the Planning
Commission.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Crosby and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Adams
DATE: December 30, 2009
SUBJ: Planning Department Updates for January 5, 2010 City Council Meeting
Planning staff has kept very busy over the past few weeks. The City has received six land use
applications for review within the past month, which is more than the previous 14 months
combined. Staff has also continued discussion with two other property owners regarding
applications which may be submitted (lot combination, amended site plan review)
Ordinance Updates
A) Mixed Use Zoning Regulations — staff and consultants from NAC held an Open House on
September 29, and NAC prepared the ordinance for a Public Hearing at the October 13 and
November 10 Planning Commission meetings. The Planning Commission recommended
approval of the ordinance with some changes. The ordinance was presented to the City
Council for review on December 1 and is on the consent agenda for January 5, 2010.
B) Private Recreation Zoning District — staff believes that this ordinance is not essential for
the City's zoning ordinances to be consistent with the new Comp Plan. As a result, staff is
recommending that this ordinance be placed lower in the priority list.
C) Future Commercial Holding District — staff believes the next zoning ordinance to consider
is a "holding district" for properties which have been identified for future commercial or
business development, but would not be allowed to develop under the new Staging Plan.
Staff intends to present a draft of this ordinance to the Planning Commission in January.
Land Use Application Reviews
A) Septic System Wetland Setback Variance — 1255 Medina Road —The City Council reviewed
the request at the December 15 meeting and directed staff to prepare a resolution of
approval. The resolution will appear on the January 5 Council agenda.
B) Appeal of Administrative Decision — 2590 Keller Road — the property owner and contractor
have appeals staff's denial of a permit to construct two 4'x4' monuments within the City
right-of-way adjacent to 2590 Keller. The Council will hear the Appeal at the January 5
Council meeting.
C) Three Rivers Near Wilderness CUP — Three Rivers has requested a CUP amendment to
construct a small office building at the Near Wilderness facility. This request is scheduled
for a Public Hearing at the January Planning Commission meeting and will be heard by the
Council in February.
D) Tuckborough Farms Easement Vacation — 2830 Cabaline Trail — During the process of
selling this property, the title company discovered that an old drainage and utility easement
had remained from before the property was platted as it is today. Staff has received a
Planning Department Update
Page 1 of 2 January 5, 2010
City Council Meeting
request to vacate the old easement and had begun necessary notifications for a Public
Hearing on the request at the January 19 City Council meeting.
E) OSI Plat, Site Plan Review, CUP, Rezoning — NW corner of Arrowhead and Hwy 55 —
Open Systems International (OSI) has applied to subdivide a 19 -acre portion of the property
and also for review of the Site Plan for their 92,000 square foot building. Staff is beginning
review of the request, and the Public Hearing may be held at the February Planning
Commission meeting.
F) Enclave of Medina Concept Plan Review — 3212 Hunter Drive — Lennar has applied for a
Concept Plan for a 195 -lot subdivision on the Holasek property. The concept is a
combination of 65 -foot wide and 78 -foot wide single family lots. Staff is beginning review
of the request, and the Public Hearing may be held at the February Planning Commission.
G) Bryson/LeMond Lot Line Rearrangement — 3000 and 3082 Willow Drive — the applicants
have applied to shift the lot line between their properties. The application is incomplete for
review and staff awaits plans from the property owners' surveyor.
H) Holy Name Cemetery — The City Council approved resolutions for the lot combination,
CUP/Site Plan, Interim Use Permit and easement vacation. Staff is working with the
applicant to get all necessary documents recorded correctly.
I) Wrangler's Restaurant — 32 Hamel Road — the Council approved resolutions at the July 21
meeting. Staff has been in contact with the applicant regarding recording of the plat and
requirements for submitting building permits.
Additional Projects
A) Comprehensive Plan Update — The Metropolitan Council has approved the City's 2010-
2030 Comprehensive Plan. Staff is formatting the "final version" of the Plan following City
Council approval. The City continues the process of updating ordinances necessary so that
the official controls are consistent with the Plan.
B) Watershed Memoranda of Understanding; Wetland Conservation Act revisions
The City needs to approve of memoranda of understanding (MOU) with the Watershed
Districts in the City regarding authority now that the City has approved the Surface Water
Management Plan. Staff has made contact with the Watershed about the changes requested
by Council, and will update the Council after receiving a response.
Additionally, the Wetland Conservation Act was updated in August, and a number of the
changes require action by the City. The Council will need to grant staff the authority to
review administrative permits. The City will also need to establish an appeals process and
also regulations regarding wetland violation enforcement. Staff intends to work on this
project and place necessary ordinance or resolutions on a Council agenda in the coming
months.
C) Zoning Enforcement (Hamel Station tree removal)
Staff has sent the developer notice of their violations of the City Tree Preservation and
Shoreland Overlay District ordinances. The notice required the developer to provide a
remediation plan by the end of January. If the property owner does not follow through with
an approved plan, staff will begin considering criminal and/or civil remedies.
Planning Department Update
Page 2 of 2 January 5, 2010
City Council Meeting
Medina Planning Commission Draft November 10, 2009 Meeting Minutes
CITY OF MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
Draft Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
1. Call to Order: Commissioner R. Reid called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present: Planning Commissioners, Robin Reid, Victoria Reid, Kent Williams, and Beth Nielsen
Absent: Jim Simons, Charles Nolan, and Michele Litts
Also Present: City Planner Dusty Finke, Laurie Smith and Stephen Grittman of Northwest
Associated Consultants, Inc.
2. Public Comments on Items not on the Agenda:
No public comments.
3. Update from City Council Proceedings:
Weir presented the update that the Council:
heard a complaint about early morning, weekend disturbance because of hunting, and
bird shot falling on a resident's roof and trees. Council will discuss the issue further at its
January workshop;
voted to charge old assessments deferred through Green Acres at the full compounded
interest rate;
directed staff to work with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District on language within a
Memorandum of Understanding to make sure that project costs of phosphorous reduction
are apportioned equitably between the watershed and the city;
refined the standards of the Business Park and Business Zoning District ordinance, and
reverted to the 3 -acre minimum lot size in Business Park as twice recommended by the
Planning Commission;
approved changes to the driveway ordinance that increased the width of driveways at the
road edge from 22' to 24,' and 28 feet at the property line. Council also discussed how to
deal with recent driveways where the plan dimensions were clear, but driveways were
built too wide upon final inspection;
reviewed Corcoran's Comprehensive Plan and directed staff to express Medina's desire
to work cooperatively on a future trail along Hackamore Drive. We recommended that
Corcoran match Medina's classification of Hackamore Drive as an A Minor Collector
and agreed with Corcoran that County Road 116 should be upgraded to an A Minor
Arterial;
discussed a purpose statement for the Environmental Fund;
approved the Concept Plan Review ordinance with all recommendations of the Planning
Commission;
1
Medina Planning Commission Draft November 10, 2009 Meeting Minutes
revised a section of the Personnel Policy, shortening a resignation period to 14 days.
4. Planning Department Report:
Finke updated the Commission that staff has received questions on potential land use
applications that would be large projects if moved forward. He further announced that their may
not be a December Planning Commission meeting due to the lack of land use applications and
the need for additional time to write a new ordinance. He announced the City would be hosting a
recognition celebration on Thursday December 3rd and the Planning Commission would be
receiving an invitation.
5. Approval of October 13, 2009 Planning Commission Minutes:
Motion by R. Reid, seconded by Williams, to approve the October 13, 2009 minutes with
recommended changes. Motion carried unanimously. (Absent: Jim Simons, Charles Nolan, and
Michele Litts)
6. Continued Public Hearing - Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 8 of Medina's City Code
creating new zoning regulations for future development on property identified in the Mixed
Use land use in the City's 2010-2030 Comprehensive Plan (Public Hearing continued from
October 13th meeting).
Smith summarized the changes to the ordinance since the October meeting:
She described the "Transitional Language" which was added to the purpose statement of the
ordinance. She stated the language is strong enough that it could be used as a basis for denying
an application if it did not provide the transition the City was seeking.
Smith stated that allowed uses increased, which included: Assisted Living, Nursing Homes,
Motor Fuel Stations, and Vertical Mixed Use. She further described uses City staff
recommended, such as: religious institutions, educational facilities, warehousing, and
manufacturing.
Smith described the regulations which were applied to vertical mixed use: first floor must be
commercial; residential shall be counted towards required % of residential, and requirement for
one enclosed parking space within the building or an attached garage. Smith stated it may be
worth discussing the height restrictions as it has to do with vertical mixed use.
Smith stated density bonuses were added in the residential standards consistent with the R-3
district.
Public Hearing re -opened at 7:25 p.m.
V. Reid asked if the transitional language was clear enough since it seemed a bit convoluted.
2
Medina Planning Commission Draft November 10, 2009 Meeting Minutes
Williams stated the language was understandable to him.
R. Reid liked the language.
R. Reid inquired about the restriction of daycare only allowing one person to reside at property.
Smith clarified the language as it pertained to residential in -home daycares.
V. Reid asked about commercial daycares. Finke explained daycares would be allowed in both
the residential and commercial areas, but both have very different standards under state statute
which could be better clarified.
V. Reid inquired about religious and educational facilities and what should be done with them.
Smith explained the uses are listed as conditional uses in residential.
Williams inquired if a church was listed as a residential use couldn't the church count towards
the 50% residential regulation requirement? Grittman stated it's a consideration a property
owner would need to make. If a portion of property is sold for a religious institution, the seller
would still need to make sure they could account for the number of residential units in the
remaining property.
Williams stated it may be theoretical, but he believes that if a developer could satisfy a portion of
their 50% residential with a religious institution, they would then have increased density in the
rest, which could hurt the chance to have a good transition of uses.
V. Reid stated she believes schools really belong in a residential area, and by calling them
commercial it would force them along the Highway, which raises a concern to her.
Williams suggested the facilities be conditional uses in the commercial list.
Grittman suggested creating separate categories for Institutional. Finke said he didn't think it
was necessary to have a distinction between commercial and institutional.
The consensus of the Commission was to add the institutional uses as conditional commercial
uses.
Weir inquired if there should be setbacks between densities within the mixed use development.
She said as you go from commercial to multi -family to townhomes to single family it seems
there may be a need for setbacks and buffers. Smith stated it was covered within the buffer yard
requirements of the ordinance.
V. Reid inquired about County Road 19 and Willow Drive. Finke stated that the mixed use
along Willow Drive and north of Highway 55 is adjacent to some industrial property. Williams
stated the idea was to push commercial development toward the main roads.
The Commission discussed building height within the residential area. The consensus of the
Commission was to maintain the 32 foot height in residential.
3
Medina Planning Commission Draft November 10, 2009 Meeting Minutes
Finke asked if the Commission favored the limitations on size and intensity for religious
institutions.
The consensus of the Commission was to maintain the limitations and to direct larger facilities
into the Business or Commercial areas.
Williams inquired about the modulation requirement and had concerns with designing.
The consensus was to use the modulation requirement of the Business Park zoning district.
V. Reid said she doesn't like the language "shall be no less than 200 feet." It would seem better
to say "shall be at least 200 feet."
Weir asked about pentaflex lighting along gas station canopies. Finke suggested it may be better
to tackle the language in the Sign ordinance.
The consensus.was to maintain the maximum building height at 35 feet for both commercial and
vertical mixed use.
Public Hearing closed at 8:33 p.m.
Motion by V. Reid, seconded by Nielsen, to approve the mixed use ordinance with
recommended changes. Motion carried unanimously. (Absent: Jim Simons, Charles Nolan, and
Michele Litts)
8. City Council Meeting Schedule: Discussion of representation at Council meeting.
9. Adiourn: Motion by Nielsen, seconded by V. Reid to adjourn at 8:35 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously. (Absent: Jim Simons, Charles Nolan, and Michele Litts)
4
Agenda Item: 6
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Debra Peterson -Dufresne, Planning Assistant
MEETING DATE: January 8, 2010
SUBJECT: Three Rivers Park District, Baker Near -Wilderness Settlement
Request for CUP Amendment — Public Hearing
Application Date: November 24, 2009
Review Deadline Date: March 23, 2010 (120 days)
Background
Three Rivers Park District, the applicant, is requesting to amend their Conditional Use Permit
(CUP) for the Near -Wilderness Settlement Area to allow for the construction of a 768 square
foot office building.
The property is in the Public/Semi-Public (PS) zoning district. The zoning ordinance requires a
conditional use permit amendment for any new construction.
The Three Rivers Park District has identified the need for an office building at the Near -
Wilderness Settlement Area. The office building would be occupied by three full-time and one
part-time employee. Office staff would provide direct, on -site supervision of operations.
The existing lodge was constructed in 1998 and is predominantly used for educational
programming and is also rented for groups, which would continue to be utilized.
Developable Area
The Three Rivers Park District has established a policy that a maximum of 20% of the land area
within the park may be developed. Three Rivers staff provided a "Composite Master Plan" of
Baker Near -Wilderness Area illustrating the new office building being located within the 20%
Developable Area. The proposed office building will not impact the development percentage.
Exterior Materials
Half -log stained siding and metal clad windows are proposed for the exterior of the new office
building. The exterior materials will match the adjacent lodge and camper cabins. An unstained
piece of half -log will be presented at the meeting.
A "green" roof system is proposed, and a summary of benefits by the applicant is attached for
your review. Staff requested the applicant to identify other building locations within the metro
area with "green" roof systems, which is also incorporated in their summary.
Site Summary
Lot Size Requirement:
Existing Lot Size:
Building Height Maximum:
Proposed Building Height:
Required Setbacks
Front Yard Setback:
Rear Yard Setback:
Side Yard Setback:
No Minimum
295.32 Acres
30 Feet
15'-11"
50 Feet
30 Feet
30 Feet
Proposed Setbacks of Office Building
Proposed Front Yard Setback: 847 Feet
Proposed Side Yard Setback: 590 Feet
Proposed Rear Yard Setback: 1068 Feet
Building Size
Office Building:
Parking
Existing:
Existing Parking (paved):
Existing Parking (unpaved):
Total:
768 Square Feet
37 Spaces
4 Spaces
41 Spaces
Proposed to Remain:
Parking to Remain (paved): 36 Spaces*
Parking to Remain (unpaved): 4 Spaces
Total: 40 Spaces
Required Parking:
New Office Building: 2 Spaces (one space for each 400 s.f. of gross floor area)
Lodge: 40 Spaces (one space per 3 seats/120 patrons)
Log Cabins (8): 0 Spaces (not rented out separate from events)
Total: 42 Spaces
Overflow Parking: 40 Spaces (approximate)
(Turkey Barn)
Near Wilderness Settlement CUP Amendment Page 2 of 7
Planning Commission Meeting 01-12-10
*Two handicap accessible spaces are proposed to be relocated to the southern parking lot near
the new building. The relocated handicap accessible spaces will take away three regular
parking spaces.
Parking
Currently the Near -Wilderness Settlement area has 37 paved parking spaces for the existing
lodge and log cabins and 4 unpaved spaces for employees. The current requirement for parking
with the lodge and cabins at maximum capacity is 40 spaces. The original CUP required 40
paved parking spaces. The site currently only has 37 paved spaces.
The proposed office building requires two additional paved parking spaces. This brings the
required total to 42 paved spaces. The site plan relocates handicap accessible parking to be next
to the new office building and will take three regular parking spaces. In effect the overall
parking is reduced by one space. In summary the overall site would be deficient 6 paved parking
spaces.
Staff has had conversations with the Park District regarding parking and has indicated they host a
handful of events per year that meets their maximum occupancy in the lodge. During the large
events if additional parking is needed outside of the paved parking spaces, they utilize an
unpaved area southwest of the lodge and camper cabin area for overflow parking, otherwise
known as the turkey barn.
Staff has checked if the City has received complaints regarding insufficient parking and we are
not aware of any complaints in this area. Due to the rural and natural setting of this area, staff
recommends not increasing hardcover with additional parking spaces.
Staff does recommend that if the Park District were to ask for an addition to the lodge, additional
paved parking should be added.
Trees and Landscaping
One significant tree and a few young aspens are proposed to be removed as part of the project.
The applicant is not required to plant replacement trees as part of the proposed project based on
the volume of trees on -site. All areas disturbed by excavation will be reseeded with native
prairie grasses as shown on plan sheet CUP 1.
Signage
The applicant proposes to install a 12" x 36" wall sign on the south exterior elevation of the
office building.
Near Wilderness Settlement CUP Amendment Page 3 of 7
Planning Commission Meeting 01-12-10
Lighting
Two light fixtures are proposed for the exterior of the east and west elevations. Exterior lighting
will be required to meet the City's minimum requirements under Section 829.04.
LID Review
A green roof is an LID practice that reduces energy, stormwater management costs, and roof
replacement costs. It also provides improved urban air quality and helps in mitigating climate
change.
Staff feels the increase in hardcover is relatively small in comparison to the overall size of the
Near -Wilderness Settlement Area. In terms of storm water treatment, a retention area will be
installed west of the office and east of the southern parking lot. This retention area will capture
run-off from the walkway leading to the office building.
The project also includes a wood chip trail connecting to the northern parking lot/drive area
rather than an impervious surface.
Resolution 97-29
Resolution 97-29 was approved for the development of the main lodge and eight log cabins.
Staff reviewed the conditions of approval from 1997 and found the following not in compliance:
1. Forty parking spaces required to be paved.
2. The eight individual log cabins were to be named after early settlers from the area.
3. The security gate constructed on the access road from County Road 24 was installed
approximately 75 feet from County Road 24 rather than the required 275 feet.
A new resolution will be created superseding the 1997 resolution. Staff recommends the
Commission discuss whether paving should be required and if the eight individual log cabins
should be named after early settlers. The applicant has indicated they could name the log cabins
after early settlers if the Commission felt it was necessary.
Engineering Considerations
The City Engineer does not have any concerns with the project. Erosion control measures would
be required prior to start of project as is required of all projects.
Building & Fire Considerations
The applicant has been working closely with Metro West regarding accessibility and "no
parking" signage along areas outside of the approved marked parking.
Near Wilderness Settlement CUP Amendment Page 4 of 7
Planning Commission Meeting 01-12-10
Police Considerations
The Police Chief has reviewed the proposed improvements and does not have any issues.
Public Works Considerations
The Public Works Superintendant has reviewed the proposed improvements and does not have
any issues with the application.
Planning Considerations
Planning staff recommends approval of the proposed application with conditions as listed.
City Discretion
The City has a relatively low level of discretion when it comes to reviewing Conditional Use
Permits. If the application meets City ordinances, the CUP should be approved. However, the
City may impose conditions on the approval that protect the best interests of the surrounding
community and the City as a whole.
Conditional Use Permit Ordinance Compliance
While reviewing Conditional Use Permits, City ordinances (Section 825.39) state that the City
should consider the following:
Subd. 1. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in
the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair
property values within the immediate vicinity.
Staff believes the office building will not have an impact on neighboring properties.
Subd. 2. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly
development of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area.
The surrounding vacant property is largely Park Reserve land.
Subd. 3. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities have been or
are being provided.
The City's engineer has reviewed the plans and does not bring forward any issues. The
applicant is working with Building Official on the private septic and well connections.
Subd. 4. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide sufficient off-street parking
and loading space to serve the proposed use.
Near Wilderness Settlement CUP Amendment Page 5 of 7
Planning Commission Meeting 01-12-10
Daily parking needs are satisfied, with the exception of a handful of events per calendar year. It
is during these events the Park District has utilized the Turkey Barn area for overflow parking.
This area is located south of the proposed office building/existing lodge. Staff does not have
concerns with utilizing this area since it is not needed regularly.
Subd. 5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor,
fumes, dust, noise and vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance, and to control
lighted signs and other lights in such a manner that no disturbance to neighboring properties will
result.
The City will require lighting to comply with Section 829.04; all lighting is proposed to be
downcast with "cut-off ' type fixtures.
Subd. 6. The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of
the City and to the existing land use.
The office use is beneficial and reasonably related to assist in the coordination of the cabins and
lodge rentals.
Subd. 7. The use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and the purposes of the zoning
district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use.
Staff believes that the use continues to be consistent with the purposes of the Public/Semi-public
zoning district.
Subd. 8. The use is not in conflict with the policies plan of the City.
Staff believes the use is consistent with the "public/semi public " guiding.
Subd. 9. The use will not cause a traffic hazard or congestion.
Staff believes that the construction of the office building will not generate additional vehicle
traffic to the Settlement Area.
Subd. 10. Existing businesses nearby will not be adversely affected by intrusion of noise, glare or
general unsightliness.
Staff believes the distance that the facility is set back mitigates these concerns.
Subd. 11. The developer shall submit a time schedule for completion of the project.
The applicant has stated they would like to start construction in the spring of 2010.
Subd. 12. The developer shall provide proof of ownership of the property to the Zoning Officer.
The property is owned by the Three River Park District.
Near Wilderness Settlement CUP Amendment Page 6 of 7
Planning Commission Meeting 01-12-10
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment to allow for construction
of a 768 square foot office building, subject to the following terms and conditions:
1) The applicant shall install "No Parking" signs for all areas outside of the approved
marked parking to the approval of Metro West Inspections, Inc.
2) The applicant shall provide coordinated parking at the Turkey Barn, located south of the
office building during larger events at lodge.
3) Building permits shall be obtained for the construction of the office building, septic, and
wall sign.
4) The applicant shall obtain approval from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for the
office building.
5) All areas of building shall meet ADA requirements and be accessible unless the
Applicant receives an exemption from the state.
6) The site shall be inspected by the Maple Plain Fire Department and city staff for
approved accessibility for emergencies.
7) The proposed site must be developed in accordance with the approved building and site
plans and in accordance with the building and fire codes. If the Applicant wishes to
make any changes to the plans after approval which will be significant, in the opinion of
the city staff, the Applicant must return to the planning commission for further review.
8) The applicant shall pay to the City a fee in the amount sufficient to pay for all costs
associated with the review of the application to amend the Conditional Use Permit.
Attachments
1) Aerial Site Map
2) Baker Park Reserve Composite Master Plan — Developed Area
3) Applicant's Narrative
4) Benefits of a Green Roof -Narrative by applicant
5) Site Plan
6) Parking Lot Layout
7) Utility/Grading Plan
8) Floor Plan
9) Exterior Color Perspective from Southwest
10) Exterior Elevations
Near Wilderness Settlement CUP Amendment Page 7 of 7
Planning Commission Meeting 01-12-10
Agenda Item: 6
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Debra Peterson -Dufresne, Planning Assistant
MEETING DATE: January 8, 2010
SUBJECT: Three Rivers Park District, Baker Near -Wilderness Settlement
Request for CUP Amendment — Public Hearing
Application Date: November 24, 2009
Review Deadline Date: March 23, 2010 (120 days)
Background
Three Rivers Park District, the applicant, is requesting to amend their Conditional Use Permit
(CUP) for the Near -Wilderness Settlement Area to allow for the construction of a 768 square
foot office building.
The property is in the Public/Semi-Public (PS) zoning district. The zoning ordinance requires a
conditional use permit amendment for any new construction.
The Three Rivers Park District has identified the need for an office building at the Near -
Wilderness Settlement Area. The office building would be occupied by three full-time and one
part-time employee. Office staff would provide direct, on -site supervision of operations.
The existing lodge was constructed in 1998 and is predominantly used for educational
programming and is also rented for groups, which would continue to be utilized.
Developable Area
The Three Rivers Park District has established a policy that a maximum of 20% of the land area
within the park may be developed. Three Rivers staff provided a "Composite Master Plan" of
Baker Near -Wilderness Area illustrating the new office building being located within the 20%
Developable Area. The proposed office building will not impact the development percentage.
Exterior Materials
Half -log stained siding and metal clad windows are proposed for the exterior of the new office
building. The exterior materials will match the adjacent lodge and camper cabins. An unstained
piece of half -log will be presented at the meeting.
A "green" roof system is proposed, and a summary of benefits by the applicant is attached for
your review. Staff requested the applicant to identify other building locations within the metro
area with "green" roof systems, which is also incorporated in their summary.
Site Summary
Lot Size Requirement:
Existing Lot Size:
Building Height Maximum:
Proposed Building Height:
Required Setbacks
Front Yard Setback:
Rear Yard Setback:
Side Yard Setback:
No Minimum
295.32 Acres
30 Feet
15'-11"
50 Feet
30 Feet
30 Feet
Proposed Setbacks of Office Building
Proposed Front Yard Setback: 847 Feet
Proposed Side Yard Setback: 590 Feet
Proposed Rear Yard Setback: 1068 Feet
Building Size
Office Building:
Parking
Existing:
Existing Parking (paved):
Existing Parking (unpaved):
Total:
768 Square Feet
37 Spaces
4 Spaces
41 Spaces
Proposed to Remain:
Parking to Remain (paved): 36 Spaces*
Parking to Remain (unpaved): 4 Spaces
Total: 40 Spaces
Required Parking:
New Office Building: 2 Spaces (one space for each 400 s.f. of gross floor area)
Lodge: 40 Spaces (one space per 3 seats/120 patrons)
Log Cabins (8): 0 Spaces (not rented out separate from events)
Total: 42 Spaces
Overflow Parking: 40 Spaces (approximate)
(Turkey Barn)
Near Wilderness Settlement CUP Amendment Page 2 of 7
Planning Commission Meeting 01-12-10 •
*Two handicap accessible spaces are proposed to be relocated to the southern parking lot near
the new building. The relocated handicap accessible spaces will take away three regular
parking spaces.
Parking
Currently the Near -Wilderness Settlement area has 37 paved parking spaces for the existing
lodge and log cabins and 4 unpaved spaces for employees. The current requirement for parking
with the lodge and cabins at maximum capacity is 40 spaces. The original CUP required 40
paved parking spaces. The site currently only has 37 paved spaces.
The proposed office building requires two additional paved parking spaces. This brings the
required total to 42 paved spaces. The site plan relocates handicap accessible parking to be next
to the new office building and will take three regular parking spaces. In effect the overall
parking is reduced by one space. In summary the overall site would be deficient 6 paved parking
spaces.
Staff has had conversations with the Park District regarding parking and has indicated they host a
handful of events per year that meets their maximum occupancy in the lodge. During the large
events if additional parking is needed outside of the paved parking spaces, they utilize an
unpaved area southwest of the lodge and camper cabin area for overflow parking, otherwise
known as the turkey barn.
Staff has checked if the City has received complaints regarding insufficient parking and we are
not aware of any complaints in this area. Due to the rural and natural setting of this area, staff
recommends not increasing hardcover with additional parking spaces.
Staff does recommend that if the Park District were to ask for an addition to the lodge, additional
paved parking should be added.
Trees and Landscaping
One significant tree and a few young aspens are proposed to be removed as part of the project.
The applicant is not required to plant replacement trees as part of the proposed project based on
the volume of trees on -site. All areas disturbed by excavation will be reseeded with native
prairie grasses as shown on plan sheet CUP 1.
Signage
The applicant proposes to install a 12" x 36" wall sign on the south exterior elevation of the
office building.
Near Wilderness Settlement CUP Amendment Page 3 of 7
Planning Commission Meeting 01-12-10
Lighting
Two light fixtures are proposed for the exterior of the east and west elevations. Exterior lighting
will be required to meet the City's minimum requirements under Section 829.04.
LID Review
A green roof is an LID practice that reduces energy, stormwater management costs, and roof
replacement costs. It also provides improved urban air quality and helps in mitigating climate
change.
Staff feels the increase in hardcover is relatively small in comparison to the overall size of the
Near -Wilderness Settlement Area. In terms of storm water treatment, a retention area will be
installed west of the office and east of the southern parking lot. This retention area will capture
run-off from the walkway leading to the office building.
The project also includes a wood chip trail connecting to the northern parking lot/drive area
rather than an impervious surface.
Resolution 97-29
Resolution 97-29 was approved for the development of the main lodge and eight log cabins.
Staff reviewed the conditions of approval from 1997 and found the following not in compliance:
1. Forty parking spaces required to be paved.
2. The eight individual log cabins were to be named after early settlers from the area.
3. The security gate constructed on the access road from County Road 24 was installed
approximately 75 feet from County Road 24 rather than the required 275 feet.
A new resolution will be created superseding the 1997 resolution. Staff recommends the
Commission discuss whether paving should be required and if the eight individual log cabins
should be named after early settlers. The applicant has indicated they could name the log cabins
after early settlers if the Commission felt it was necessary.
Engineering Considerations
The City Engineer does not have any concerns with the project. Erosion control measures would
be required prior to start of project as is required of all projects.
Building & Fire Considerations
The applicant has been working closely with Metro West regarding accessibility and "no
parking" signage along areas outside of the approved marked parking.
Near Wilderness Settlement CUP Amendment Page 4 of 7
Planning Commission Meeting 01-12-10
Police Considerations
The Police Chief has reviewed the proposed improvements and does not have any issues.
Public Works Considerations
The Public Works Superintendant has reviewed the proposed improvements and does not have
any issues with the application.
Planning Considerations
Planning staff recommends approval of the proposed application with conditions as listed.
City Discretion
The City has a relatively low level of discretion when it comes to reviewing Conditional Use
Permits. If the application meets City ordinances, the CUP should be approved. However, the
City may impose conditions on the approval that protect the best interests of the surrounding
community and the City as a whole.
Conditional Use Permit Ordinance Compliance
While reviewing Conditional Use Permits, City ordinances (Section 825.39) state that the City
should consider the following:
Subd. 1. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in
the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair
property values within the immediate vicinity.
Staff believes the office building will not have an impact on neighboring properties.
Subd. 2. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly
development of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area.
The surrounding vacant property is largely Park Reserve land.
Subd. 3. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities have been or
are being provided.
The City's engineer has reviewed the plans and does not bring forward any issues. The
applicant is working with Building Official on the private septic and well connections.
Subd. 4. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide sufficient off-street parking
and loading space to serve the proposed use.
Near Wilderness Settlement CUP Amendment Page 5 of 7
Planning Commission Meeting 01-12-10
Daily parking needs are satisfied, with the exception of a handful of events per calendar year. It
is during these events the Park District has utilized the Turkey Barn area for overflow parking.
This area is located south of the proposed office building/existing lodge. Staff does not have
concerns with utilizing this area since it is not needed regularly.
Subd. 5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor,
fumes, dust, noise and vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance, and to control
lighted signs and other lights in such a manner that no disturbance to neighboring properties will
result.
The City will require lighting to comply with Section 829.04; all lighting is proposed to be
downcast with "cut-off" type fixtures.
Subd. 6. The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of
the City and to the existing land use.
The office use is beneficial and reasonably related to assist in the coordination of the cabins and
lodge rentals.
Subd. 7. The use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and the purposes of the zoning
district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use.
Staff believes that the use continues to be consistent with the purposes of the Public/Semi-public
zoning district.
Subd. 8. The use is not in conflict with the policies plan of the City.
Staff believes the use is consistent with the "public/semi-public" guiding.
Subd. 9. The use will not cause a traffic hazard or congestion.
Staff believes that the construction of the office building will not generate additional vehicle
traffic to the Settlement Area.
Subd. 10. Existing businesses nearby will not be adversely affected by intrusion of noise, glare or
general unsightliness.
Staff believes the distance that the facility is set back mitigates these concerns.
Subd. 11. The developer shall submit a time schedule for completion of the project.
The applicant has stated they would like to start construction in the spring of 2010.
Subd. 12. The developer shall provide proof of ownership of the property to the Zoning Officer.
The property is owned by the Three River Park District.
Near Wilderness Settlement CUP Amendment Page 6 of 7
Planning Commission Meeting 01-12-10
\to
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment to allow for construction
of a 768 square foot office building, subject to the following terms and conditions:
1) The applicant shall install "No Parking" signs for all areas outside of the approved
marked parking to the approval of Metro West Inspections, Inc.
2) The applicant shall provide coordinated parking at the Turkey Barn, located south of the
office building during larger events at lodge.
3) Building permits shall be obtained for the construction of the office building, septic, and
wall sign.
4) The applicant shall obtain approval from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for the
office building.
5) All areas of building shall meet ADA requirements and be accessible unless the
Applicant receives an exemption from the state.
6) The site shall be inspected by the Maple Plain Fire Department and city staff for
approved accessibility for emergencies.
7) The proposed site must be developed in accordance with the approved building and site
plans and in accordance with the building and fire codes. If the Applicant wishes to
make any changes to the plans after approval which will be significant, in the opinion of
the city staff, the Applicant must return to the planning commission for further review.
8) The applicant shall pay to the City a fee in the amount sufficient to pay for all costs
associated with the review of the application to amend the Conditional Use Permit.
Attachments
1) Aerial Site Map
2) Baker Park Reserve Composite Master Plan — Developed Area
3) Applicant's Narrative
4) Benefits of a Green Roof -Narrative by applicant
5) Site Plan
6) Parking Lot Layout
7) Utility/Grading Plan
8) Floor Plan
9) Exterior Color Perspective from Southwest
10) Exterior Elevations
Near Wildemess Settlement CUP Amendment Page 7 of 7
Planning Commission Meeting 01-12-10
Bo
Lake Launatc
Independen
pt. of NRM
a7hern Div.
Bike/Hike
Trl Parking
c
w'
NORTH
2000'
Northern Div/
Baker Maint.
Facilit
Maint.
Storaal
_ = Facility
BAKER PARK
RESERVE
COMPOSITE MASTER PLAN
BAKER NEAR -WILDERNESS
OFFICE BUILDING
Building
Location
LEGEND
20% Development Area
80% Natural Resource Areas
Sanctuaries
Enviromental Preservation Area
Other Natural Areas
— Park Roads
Marsh
Park Boundary
Unacquired Property
CITY OF MEDINA
CITY OF ORONO
Al..t... Tt,:.- .........=s'-...:11 4... ........:4.... -l...J ..444.:..,
— __..:Lle_1"'1
Project Narrative
November 24, 2009
Baker Near -Wilderness Settlement Office Building
Proiect Location
Baker Near -Wilderness Settlement
4001 County Rd. 24
Baker Park Reserve
Medina, Minnesota 55359
Proiect Background
The Baker Near -Wilderness Settlement Lodge was constructed in 1998. The use of
this space is mostly for educational programming but also serves groups of various
sizes on a rental basis. Three Rivers Park District will be locating three full-time and
one part-time staff at this new office building for direct, on -site supervision of
operations. This building is anticipated to serve all future staff needs anticipated at
this time.
Proiect Aesthetics
The new office building will be designed to replicate the existing aesthetic of the site.
The exterior siding will consist of half -log siding and metal clad windows. The half -log
siding will be stained with Sikkens Cetol 23 Plus, Color 078 Natural which matches
the adjacent lodge and camper cabins. The roof will be a vegetated green roof (see
Benefits of Green Roofs).
Below are images of the existing lodge and cabins whose exterior materiality will
closely reflect the look of the new office building.
Page 1 of 3
Project Narrative
November 24, 2009
Page 2 of 3
Project Narrative
November 24, 2009
Site Disturbance
The Baker Near -Wilderness Office Building has been sited to provide maximum
visibility to park guests as well as reduce the overall site disturbance of the project.
The project team has been working closely with the Park District Natural Resources
Department to effectively plan the construction execution of this project with minimal
negative impact, including restrictive construction limits that have been established.
The Park District plans to remove one mature tree and a few young aspens as part of
this project but plans to connect to private and public utilities in a manner that
reduces any long term environmental site impacts. One example is the plan to
directionally bore the water service to the building, negating any impact that an open
trench would have on the adjacent vegetation.
Additionally, the Park District is obtaining approval from the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District, which includes verification of erosion and sediment control that
will meet the Park District's "Non Degredation" policy, that requires that no project
have an impact on a water body that would reduce the water quality below current
levels.
\\Hpas400\h\PROJECTS\Baker Park Reserve\BAK 0701 Baker Near -Wilderness Settlement Office Building\A General
Corr\CUP #2\BAK0701 Project Narrative - CUP.doc
Page 3 of 3
Baker Near -Wilderness Proposed Office Building
Benefits of Green Roofs
Reducing roof replacement costs
In Minnesota, a typical gravel -ballasted flat roof is expected to perform for 15-20 years before
replacement is necessary. Roof membranes deteriorate when exposed to the hot and cold temperature
extremes we experience in Minnesota, and also when exposed to UV radiation from sunlight. The
components of a green rooftop protect a roof membrane from these aging factors. The membrane
under a green rooftop can be expected to perform for 35 - 50 years before replacement is necessary.
This means that a building can avoid 1 - 2 roof replacements over a 50 -year lifespan. This reduces life
cycle costs as well as significantly reducing the volume of roofing materials deposited in our landfills.
Reducing energy costs
Green roofs can reduce heating and cooling demands. During a Minnesota winter, the insulation layer
and growing medium of a green roof can add r -value to a building's roof. In the summer, the impact is
more significant. Living plant material evaporating moisture from leaf surfaces will cool the rooftop
surface, reducing cooling demand up to 25 percent.
Reducing stormwater management costs
An extensive green roof with four inches of growing medium can be expected to hold a one -inch
rainfall event before any water runs off the roof surface. Nearly all the rainfall events we receive in
Minnesota are less than one inch.
Improving urban air quality
Green space is good for air quality. Green rooftops provide opportunities to increase the amount of
green space in densely developed urban areas where green space can be hard to find. A 1998 study
by Green Roofs for Healthy Cities developed a model showing that, if six percent of the rooftop
surfaces in the City of Toronto were replaced with green rooftops, the additional green space would
remove 30 tons of airborne particulate pollution each year. (This is not as critical a benefit for this
project location.)
Mitigating Climate Change and the Urban Heat Island Effect
Urban areas like Minneapolis -Saint Paul are generally 2 - 5 degrees (f) warmer than surrounding rural
areas. This is known as the Urban Heat Island effect. On top of that, the USEPA projects a 2 - 7
degree (f) increase in aggregate temperature for our region over the course of the 21st Century. It is
projected that a three -degree aggregate temperature increase in Minneapolis would triple annual
heat -related deaths from 60 to nearly 200. By cooling rooftop surfaces and improving air quality, a
critical mass of green rooftops can mitigate all of these impacts. (This is not as critical a benefit for
this project location.)
Information provided by www.m no reenroofs.orn
Green Roof Materials
Plants
PI ANTS -4 e
GROWING MED.IAM
TITRATION - ----►
DRAINGAGE
AND RETENTION
INSU:AT:ON
ROOT BARRIER -
WATERPRODFING
ROOF DFCK —�
minerals, and a lightweight aggregate material
medium, and is designed to be lightweight and
Filtration
Most green roof plants are selected to
survive hot and cold extremes, wet and dry
extremes, and to survive in a shallow layer
of growing medium. Varieties of sedum are
the most common plants seen on green
roofs across North America.
Sedums are succulent plants that can hold
significant amounts of moisture in their
waxy leaves and survive temperature and
moisture extremes. Certain varieties of
native grasses and flowers do well on green
roofs. These plants are adapted to weather
conditions in Minnesota and are
accustomed to surviving through drought
periods without irrigation.
Growing Medium
Plants on the ground grow in soil, but most
soils are unsuitable for use on a green roof.
Plants on green roofs generally grow in an
engineered mixture of compost, sand,
like expanded shale. This mixture is called the growing
to meet the nutritional needs of green roof plants.
Filtration is used to keep plant nutrients and fine particles in growing medium from washing off a
green roof. The most common filter used on green roofs is similar to the non -woven black "geotextile"
cloth available at some garden stores and landscaping centers.
Drainaae and Retention
A drainage system is used on a green roof to allow excess water to flow to drains and off the roof
surface. While green roofs are often designed to capture stormwater, extreme storm events can
produce rainfall amounts in excess of what a green roof can manage. Drainage systems are generally
less important on pitched green roofs as gravity can often effectively remove any excess water.
A drainage layer can also be designed to retain a certain amount of water. Tiny reservoirs or
absorbent mats in the assembly help retain water for the plants to use between rains or watering.
Xnsulation
Insulation as part of a green roof can serve a few purposes. In Minnesota, most plants are dormant
during the winter, and these plants survive winter best by staying frozen until spring. Too many
freeze -thaw cycles can damage plants and reduce their odds for survival. Insulation will keep heat
from inside a building from thawing plants in the winter. If desired, extra insulation can be installed to
increase the insulation value of the roof to decrease heating and cooling costs.
Root Barrier
A root barrier keeps aggressive plant roots from damaging the waterproofing. While maintenance is
important to keep aggressive plant species from becoming established on a roof, a green roof should
be designed to protect the membrane in the event an aggressive plant manages to take root.
Waterproofing
Waterproofing is the part of your roof that actually keeps the water out. Traditionally, this is asphalt
shingles over some sort of underlayment, but asphalt shingles, like a lot of roofing products, aren't
suitable for constant exposure to the water stored in a green roof. Small roofs typically use self-
adhesive sheet goods that are easy for the owner or small contractor to install.
Roof Deck
This is the stuff that covers the rafters or trusses of your roof. Solid wood and plywood decking are
suitable under a green roof.
Existing Green Roofs in Minnesota
The following Green Roofs can be viewed by the public while the facilities are open.
Lebanon Hills Visitor Center, Lebanon Hills Regional Park, 860 Cliff Road; Eagan, MN 55123
Minneapolis Central Library, Downtown Minneapolis; 310 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55401
Phillips Eco-Enterprise Center, 2801 21st Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55407
For more Green Roof installations, visit i�t F .!i`M ,,r+_E r u is.0 g/tcic isc.
\\Hpas400\h\PROJECTS\Baker Park Reserve\BAK 0701 Baker Near -Wilderness Settlement Office Building\A General Corr\CUP #2\Baker Base Map 2007.dwg
WATER BODY
PROPOSED NEAR -WILDERNESS
OFFICE BUILDING
CAMPER CABINS, 8 TOTAL
ThreeRivers
PARK DISTRICT
NEAR -WILDERNESS
LODGE
STAFF CABIN
STAFF ENTRANCE
FOR LODGE
PUBLIC ENTRANCE
FOR LODGE
Site Plan
Baker Near -Wilderness Office Building
Printed: 11/24/2009 8:47 AM
WATER BODY
Scale: 1" = 150'
Date: 11.24.2009
Drawn by: D. Elias
Printed: 11/24/2009 8:45 AM
\\Hpas400\h\PROJECTS\Baker Park Reserve\BAK 0701 Baker Near -Wilderness Settlement Office Building \A General Corr\CUP #2\Baker Base Map 2007.dwg
--Irn-0
000 --IC 70
0
> >H7
rOrzz
03 CD 03 0 0
0 - CS)
s s -°
n
can
n n
rn rn
CS) CP
C1) CJ�
N
ThreeRivers
PARK DISTRICT
BUS DROP-OFF
Parking Layout
Baker Near -Wilderness Office Building
0
Nn
C>
O rn
rnrn0
Oyx
n70U,
D -1
rrnn z z
0
Scale: 1" = 30'
Date: 11.24.2009
Drawn by: D. Elias
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
LIMITS -DISTURBED A REAS TO
BE RESEEDED WITH NATIVE
PRAIRIE GRASSES
UNDERGROUNDELECTRIC
(NEW)
STORM WATER RETENTION FOR
CLASS V WALKWAY. BUILDING
TO HAVE GREEN ROOF
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC (NEW)
PROPOSED OFFICE
BUILDING - NOT IN
EASEMENT.
BUILDING SIGNAGE TO
BE 12" X 36", MOUNTED
ON BUILDING WALL.
PARTNERS &SIRNY
a rchitects
212 West Fra nklin Avenue
Minnea polis, MN 55404
\0\9
0
i
/
/ /- - - - -- _- 1022- / - \ \ \\ \
\
, / /� _— 1023--- — �\ \ \ \
\
•
f II / /� ---- —_ — —\ \ \ 1 I \�{''
\ I I L.(-, t \\ \\ o I I — — —-1024--
,/
_ — — — — — — — _ _ _i--Cf. \ \ ,>
(77 7-.77. (7-Y"Y - A _ - 0 ▪ \
/ N \ \
/
/
c
.>: / \ \
ov \ \
.\ / \ \
/ / r`- /
— /
s. \ / 1
-1022 /C / \\ J / / / -
\ 1
1023 - _ , I / / / /
/ , / /
/r / I \ , /
1024 _ / /
,i \ 1 ( / /
j'' \ I I / / /
- I\
.. i / /
--/+. h // / r / /
/ / 0 0 o. , 0-O
/
/ 0
0
\ I Y\
/ " 1---,,,
Site Plan
l \ I
•
N. 7
1\
0
\
/7�
•
\
/
/
/
/
/
\ \ 1
-7026 \ \ \
•
1
1
GAS(NEW)
/ / Y ,.
\, r(
t`'. I//
\
o
02 6
/
TREES TO BE
REMOVED,'
(3 THUS) /
1
\SEWER(NEW),
1
1 \
1, ) / /
/ /
1 1 1 / / /
/ ". .),0-- -'1;t7\
T 1- \
/.J -at
/ / \ Y" . �"\- -
-1 \ \
I
\
\
1 / \ 1 / 1
/ / / , 1, / : C / ,
/ / .//, I
/ 1 \ 1 I /
\ 'o / I
\ \ o o / / C` ` --,„ , l 7 07 \ \
mss:, ^7'�Ir4i.3 \ , rn \ 1 , t.z _ C1 2N \
�\ \ 1 1 , j1=a-F \ o \
y \ 1 1 1 \ \ �� - �-?, \ ./ \.
1 GAS��X� 1 II >J \ 1 1 - ,' I .'
/ / WELL / sr% I I N `'!` ` \ \ \, 1 \ ,
(
1
II
N.
\ N.�. \ 1 \
\\ _
\ \_= \ \ \\\\\\ \\ 1�I , 0 N
Ir — -' \'I\11\111\111\I\I\I II `/
I I\\\III'\ 1\ 1 1 1\ 1 1\ 1 1 \I 1 /
1\ 1\\\ 1\ 1 1 1 1\\\ I 111 I`
\ I\1 1 \11\111 \ \ 1\ 1\\I
1 1 1 101N\ \ \ \ 1 \ \
o I1I\N\ \AINI I I I I I 11�\1-\\ 1
Im 1 1\ 1 1 1 1 11\1
1\\% \‘‘
1 1\\
IOIN\' IN' 1 1 1 1 1 \�
71 MIN1� �. .' w o \ \ \
0 1 1, 1\ \ I I I 1 0 I f o
1 I I 11 a I D \ I/
r// -
I I I,( 1,1 1\ I I I I\ \ I\1 / L
111\
I I I I I I I 1 1 o f I I I I -' /// 1-,ir,,, -—
/ 1 w il / -
I / l I l III 1 1 1 1\ `r < 1011
/,/I,1\1\I\1', 'I ./ ///1/////-/, -1012---UNDERGROUND
\ \ / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I �. ./11 '11\,./1 / ,
l 1 II
1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 11 1 I y_/ f ,1I 1'. / .1013- -- WATER(NEW)
II 11 , ! p' _ ` l i = X1014— WATER USE PER DAY
1 IIII'' - - C / I \ = 2 PEOPLE X 15 GAU PER .
" "',',' .v�' ;' \ / = 30 GALLONS PER DAY
11 111111 V/ cS 6',
1 11 1 1 1 1 11 I -.,� _ I
I I I I I I I I I I /_ / ,-8 '
0 I I
•
°,> I' \ ii,/ /
/\ ' /� *PHONE (EXIST)r7 Y _ :- .'4.'(7-‘/ /- \\\ ,.k`\ \\ \\ ' II 11
i~/ , / - / 1 / / \ \ \,\ \ \ 1 1
I \ \ \
J 1
PHONE (NEW) \\'\ \ \ \ \ ; /
/ \ \ \ I I
,! \ / I
it r`1 \ .. \ \ . -1028 - \ I l \\ \ \ 1
°�8
/
\
Office Building
Near Wilderness Settlement
Baker Park Reserve
Medina, MN
UNDERGROUND
/
Site Plan
Date:
11/23/09
Detail Location:
CUP
ROOF EDGE \
ABOVE \`y,
STOOP
(CUP 20
n.
1CUP South
ICUP 4I
FULL CUT- OFF EXTERIOR LIGHT -
(2 THUS.) NO OTHER EXTERIOR
LIGHTING INCLUDED IN BUILDING
OR SITE IMPROVEMENTS.
NORTH
PARTNERS & SIRNY
architects
212 tress Fra nklin Avenue
Minneapolis MN 55404
O1 Main Level Floor Plan
3/16" = 1'-0"
Office Building
Near Wilderness Settlement
Baker Park Reserve
Medina, MN
Floor Plan
Date: 11/23/09
Detail Location:
PERSPECTIVE FROM SOUTH WEST
12=10
PA RTNERS & SIRNY
architects
212 West Franklin Avenue
Minnea polis, MN 55404
Office Building
Near Wilderness Settlement
Baker Park Reserve
Medina, MN
Perspective from South West
Date: 11/23/09
Detail Location:
CUP
3
1 CUPSouth
1 3/16, -10
0 CUP W est
3/16" = l'-0 "
LIVING ROOF
PINE L OG WOOD SIDING -
STAINED
2X PINE FACIA
ROOF BEARING S
8'-0 "
GLULAM BEAMS
METAL CLAD
OPERABLE WINDOWS
PINE LOG WOOD SIDING -
STAINED
GROUND LEVEL
0"
11
LIVING ROOF
ROOF BEARING $_
I 1
PARTNERS & SIRNY
a rchitects
212 West Fra nklin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55404
Office Building
Near Wilderness Settlement
Baker Park Reserve
Medina, MN
Exterior Elevations
Date:
11/23/09
Detail Location:
CUP
4
AGENDA ITEM: 7
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner
DATE: January 5, 2010
MEETING: January 12, 2010 Planning Commission
SUBJ: Rural Commercial Holding and Rural Business Holding Ordinance
Background
The City continues to work on zoning ordinances in order to implement the 2010-2030
Comprehensive Plan update. The next topic for discussion is regulations for property which
have been identified for Commercial, General Business, or Industrial Business uses in the future,
but which cannot develop with municipal services until some time in the future as a result of the
Staging Plan.
The attached ordinance describes regulations for two zoning districts: Rural Commercial
Holding (RCH) and Rural Business Holding (RBH). The RCH district already exists and applies
to property along Highway 55 in the west of the City. RBH is a new district recommended by
staff.
Comprehensive Plan Information
As mentioned above, areas which will likely be zoned into these two districts includes properties
which have been identified as Commercial, General Business, or Industrial Business in the
Future Land Use Plan of the 2010-2030 Comprehensive Plan (the "Comp Plan"). However, the
Staging and Growth Plan in the Comp Plan describes when these properties may develop with
municipal services. The RCH and RBH districts are intended to apply to properties which may
not develop until a future staging period. When utilities become available, the properties would
then be rezoned to a Commercial or Business district upon development. Properties that fall into
this category are shown on the map on page 2 of this report.
The RCH and RBH districts are meant to implement the Staging Plan by limiting commercial
development in areas which are not yet served by utilities, but will be in the future. This is
consistent with General Land Use Development Policy #5 (page 5-5) "The staging plan will be
referenced for all future development plans in the growth corridor and shall guide future land use
decisions to ensure availability and adequacy of services."
General Information; Regulation Framework
One of the first things for the Commission to consider is a general policy question. While the
Staging Plan seeks to limit development in future stages, it is important for the City to ensure
that properties which can develop in the future have a viable use in the short-term before
development is possible. There are a few different ways for the City to regulate future
development areas. A lot of the time, communities allow a mix of rural residential and
agriculture uses to future development areas, regardless if the property is guided for residential
Rural Commercial Holding District
Ordinance Amendment Planning Commission Meeting
Page 1 of 5 January 12, 2010
v
or commercial development in the future. This makes sense when carving development areas
out of previous RR or AG areas, since this is consistent with the historical uses in the area. One
potential concern of using that strategy in Medina is that this would allow for a new home to be
built on a lot which will one day, along with all of the surrounding property, be guided for a
commercial use.
Instead, staff is recommending that the RCH and RBH districts allow agricultural and limited
commercial/business uses. There are a few existing residential properties within the RCH and
RBH area, so staff recommends adding "existing single family dwellings" as an interim use so
that they do not become non -conforming.
The Planning Commission should decide if they endorse this framework, or determine if there is
more support for an emphasis on rural residential uses.
Staff reviewed the existing RCH regulations in relation to the new regulations adopted by the
City last year for the Commercial Highway, Business Park, and Business districts. Because of
the significant differences between the Commercial and Business regulations, staff is
recommending two holding districts so that it is more likely that anything that develops prior to
utilities becoming available is consistent with the zoning district which will ultimately apply to
the property.
MEDINA
Rural Commercial Holding and Rural Business Holding
Pre -Staging Development Potential
AY 50
Lot p
Existing Use
Acres
5 -Acre Areas
of Suitable
Soils
20 Acre
Parcels
SAC Unit
Equiv
Sq. Ft.
Retail
Sq. Ft.
'Office
Sq. Ft.
Warehouse or '
Assembly'
0
Agriculture + Res
26.41
1
1
9.2
27 639
22.031
51,590
1
Agriculture
20.79
4
1
7.5
22.435
17 948
42.028
2
Office
18.58
3
1
6.7
20,145
16,116
37,738
3
Gas Station, Retail
1.62
1
1
0.6
1.757
1,405
3.291
4
Restaurant, Catenng
0.79
0
0
0.3
861
689
1.613
5
Bar, Restaurant
0.90
0
0
0.3
973
778
1.822
6
Auto Repair. Towing
1.79
1
1
0.6
1.939
1,551
3.632
7
Rural Residential
0.93
0
0
0.3
1,012
810
1,896
8
Agriculture
24.38
4
1
8.8
26,434
21,147
49,520
9
Agriculture
20.55
3
1
7.4
22.283
17,827
41,744
10
Agriculture
5.37
1
1
1.9
5.674
4.539
10,630
11
Undeveloped Land
3.48
1
1
1.3
3.773
3,019
7,069
12
Undeveloped Land
0.30
0
0
0.1
322
258
603
13
Mini -Storage
18.21
1
1
• 2.4
7,300
5,840
13,675
14
Rural Residential
1.47
1
1
0.3
792
633
1,483
15
Rural Residential
1.51
1
1
0.5
1.410
1,128
2.641
16
Agriculture
38.97
2
1
6.8
20 520
16.418
38,441
17
Agriculture
18.94
3
1
5.7
17.188
13,750
32,199
18
Agriculture
7.77
1
1
2.5
7.506
6,005
14,061
19
Agriculture
4.90
1
1
1.7
4.971
3,976
9.312
20
Agriculture
53.19
4
2
17.7
53.001
42,401
99,289
21
Rural Residential
18.17
3
1
6.4
19.162
15,330
35,898
22
Undeveloped Land
7.33
1
1
1.3
4.0200
3,216
7,530
23
Agriculture
35.51
1
1
2.2
6.738
5,390
12,623
24
Rural Residential
2002
1
1
4.2
12.561
10,049
23,531
25
Industrial
21.53
1
1
4.7
14.035
11,228
26,291
26
Industria'
12.60
1
1
3.0
9.048
7,238
16,949
27
Undeveloped Land
8.39
1
1
2.3
7.015
5,612
13,141
28
Undeveloped Land
10.78
1
1
1.9
5.795
4.636
10,855
29
Motel
3.29
1
1
1.2
3.564
2,851
6.677
30
Industnar
7.23
1
1
2.3
7.048
5.639
13,204
45
28
CMESTHUr
Future Land Use
® Commercial
General Business
Map Date: January 4, 2009
Rural Commercial Holding District
Ordinance Amendment
Page 2 of 5
January 12, 2010
Planning Commission Meeting
Allowed Uses
Staff recommends that the allowed uses in the Commercial -Highway and Business Park districts
be utilized as a starting point for the RCH and RBH districts. Staff has recommended some
changes in order to limit the uses to those that use less water and produce less wastewater since
they will be on septic systems. This is consistent with the existing RCH regulations. The
following table summarizes the uses allowed in each district within the draft ordinance:
Rural Commercial Holding (RCH)
Rural Business Holding (RBH)
Permitted Uses
Bank and Financial Institutions
Bank and Financial Institutions
Contractor services delivered off -site
Essential Services (utilities)
Essential Services (utilities)
Office Uses, including Medical Offices
Office Uses, including Medical Offices
Parks and Open Space
Parks and Open Space
Public Services (including Post Offices)
Public Services (including Post Offices)
Publishing Firms
Showrooms
Transit Station or Stop
Retail and Service uses (but not restaurants, bars, pet
stores, pawn stores, adult establishments, vets, auto
services, gas station, contractors)
Conditional Uses
Auto uses (gas station, auto repair, auto sales/rental
etc. (but not car washes)
Educational facilities
Essential Service (utilities) structures
Essential Service (utilities) structures
Indoor recreational (bowling, theaters)
Manufacturing and assembly (limited, light) — see
below
Telecommunications Tower
Veterinary Clinic, Pet Stores
Veterinary Clinic
Warehouse, Wholesale, and Distributors
Accessory Uses
Computer manufacturing and assembly
Day care or day nurseries
Day care or day nurseries
Drive -through services (with CUP)
Drive -through services (with CUP)
Industrial repair or processing (<20% floor area)
Off-street parking and loading
Off-street parking and loading
Outdoor display of goods
Outdoor sports court
Outdoor storage
Parking Structures (with CUP)
Parking Structures (with CUP)
Railroad Spur
Recreational and open space for employees
Retail sales (<15% floor area)
Seasonal Flea/Farmer's Market
Signs
Signs
Temporary Outdoor Sales Events
Transit stop/station
Warehouse (<30% floor area)
Wholesale office and showrooms
Rural Commercial Holding District
Ordinance Amendment
Page 3 of 5
January 12, 2010
Planning Commission Meeting
Lot Standards
The following table summarizes the lot standards for the RCH and RBH districts, as
recommended by staff in the draft ordinance. As with allowed uses, staff utilized the
Commercial -Highway and Business Park district regulations as a starting point.
Two unique regulations for the RCH and the RBH districts are lot size and sanitary sewer usage.
These requirements are different from the CH, B, and BP districts because these lots will not be
served by City sewer.
Staff has recommended at least a 20 -acre minimum lot size, in order to limit the potential for
development in the RCH and RBH districts before sewer becomes available. The existing RCH
district only requires 5 -acres contiguous suitable soil per lot. The map on page 2 summarizes the
difference in the number of lots which could be created without the 20 -acre minimum.
The draft ordinance limits sanitary sewer usage on a lot to 100 gallons/day per net acre. The
sanitary sewer usage regulation limits the scale of development based on the wastewater
production. Again, this regulation is in place because the sites will be served by septic systems,
and also to limit the amount of development consistent with the Staging Plan. The final three
columns of the table next to the map on page 2 translates the sanitary sewer usage limitation into
a maximum amount of square footage of different uses which could be constructed which would
produce approximately 100 gallons/day/net acre.
Draft RCH
RBH
Existing RCH
Lot Area
20 acres (5 acres
suitable)
20 acres (5 acres
suitable)
5 acres suitable
Lot Width
200 feet
200 feet
110 feet
Lot Depth
200 feet
200 feet
200 feet
Front Setback
50 feet
50 feet
50 feet
Side Setback
20 feet (or 15)
30 feet (or 15)
20 feet
Rear Setback
30 feet
30 feet
40 feet
Residential Setback
100 feet (or 75)
100 feet (or 75)
75 feet
Parking Setbacks
Front
25 feet
35 feet
25 feet
Side/Rear
20 feet
20 feet
5 feet
Residential
75 feet (or 50)
75 feet (or 50)
25 feet
Building Height
30 feet
30 feet
30 feet
Sanitary Sewer Usage
100 gal/day/net acre
100 gal/day/net acre
100 gal/day/net acre
Rural Commercial Holding District Page 4 of 5
Ordinance Amendment
January 12, 2010
Planning Commission Meeting
Design and Development Standards
Design and development standards include things such as landscaping, building materials,
building design, etc. The existing RCH regulations do not include specific design.and
development standards, but rather reference the Urban Commercial zoning district. Staff
recommends updating this reference to the new Commercial standards adopted last year.
Similarly, staff recommends referencing the Business District regulations for the RBH district.
By referencing the standards of these other districts directly, any development which may occur
in RCH or RBH will be consistent with what is expected of future development when the
properties have availability to utilities.
A copy of each of these sets of standards is attached for reference.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Commission review the regulations and the comment boxes within the
attached ordinance. The Planning Commission will hold a Public Hearing at the meeting prior to
considering a recommendation to the City Council.
Attachments
1. DRAFT Ordinance
2. Excerpt from Section 838 of the City Code (Commercial Design/Development Standards)
3. Excerpt from Section 832 of the City Code (Business Design/Development Standards)
Rural Commercial Holding District Page 5 of 5 January 12, 2010
Ordinance Amendment Planning Commission Meeting
ATTACHMENT 1 - ORDINANCE
CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO. ###
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE REGULATIONS OF THE
RURAL COMMERCIAL HOLDING (RCH) ZONING DISTRICT AND
CREATING THE RURAL BUSINESS HOLDING (RBH) ZONING DISTRICT;
AMENDING SECTION 835.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 835 of the Medina code of ordinances is amended to add the
u (1erlirlyd language and delete the ya+t}eh-l-hr+n jlr language as follows:
835 - ZONING — RURAL COMMERCIAL HOLDING DISTRICT
Section 835.01. Purpose -The purpose of this district is to provide a zoning district which is
consistent with the area guided for commercial reserve in the city's comprehensive plan. The
rural commercial holding zone includes areas of the community lying outside of the area in
which urban services are currently available to commercial uses but which will be added to the
urban service area in the future.
Section 835.02. Permitted Uses. Within the Rural Commercial Holding District the following
uses shall be permitted, subject to site plan approval, ih�_..:uiii
tini ) heici)i. a iid other ippl ezible pro%kion;oithe code:
I f I'_rnii(tolti,L•oink. Ct)inmc:lvial_Ili h,1a� i�;ill; �li�trict, is (ILA lihc,i in L't.'11, ,it
Y7�.1 tip rl tlic ihc uilovi i11 2. tint he uc•_
(WI t f it ��-i iItc� ..v ;iuii>dL'tiiiIin,' - -
(h) c,(it (�iCilitic
(C) l io;intal_ uui ii)L i 'iii Ci \ iCC;
(ii) hotels/\9(ltelS
-t)ii ile l clurri e t itilivlirici
(i) Restaurant,
Sport . health. uiiil PliA Llo'n
1r.ri�ni�ural I,.c_ tiui not inLlniin !the �r<� �uix' or ritliiLliiroi; e�tork. Iivestod,
1?rUliHC1 i„ .cilia uhline.
1',+t fa+;e1--Otae to taite
Ordinance No. ### 1 DRAFT — January 8, 2009
DATE
Comment [d1]: These uses are
currently not permitted in RCH, but there
are existing non -conforming uses today.
Theoretically, the RCH district could
utilize the same list of uses as CH, and
the sanitary sewer usage regulations
could be left as the only limitation against
heavier water uses
Comment [d2]: Option: Remove
prohibition against livestock
4-3.4_t 4tee
(ja-----Sze-re 4tH-a-l-a++e4--W<++f1-1-'+e+ees+;ih . -ieed
444 4 a4-4-k-s-+t++4-Fi414414<=taI-1-4+44+1+444(-3+t}
4-a4 -1cdicalOiii(:e:,
(4) 1- 4te++r>f-1---ee 4 44++-4++c-l+e
f?3 l3a t+ea-SI*K14e
44,1 }--4,44 to-toi --a+ 1-4-'++! 4++t a4-k=e n4e+
144)4''+4 4-L341+ee
44 4-4 4244-11-1it:
t-1 '}..€lccl+ x++e ` li4414p-its-a++41 N4ail-4.44(-1-e 1-4r t+ eti: I3tt4-+mot 4<+ -e -NE -eE4 -144.000--,qt,4 t--4ee4
(-I?}-, }-4-,?4,4 4-4-t-4-H44 t -.r.4 44--440i-414e1++€4tt 44 ;�i -- -or 1+3 (4+= -H -+R-<11 44\c°4(telF 1+k tecl
1-<-((4t1 ailt+a<-+I-t+++-C.
(-1-N-4-14r�-4=f*l4e�i++`�-{�e4a44 S4f+l��s�l+lc{--1�<4414.1-`�.c�+sic=r-�1+t>1+s-1+t+4++t+Hf4rt�etrel-1111430-se}4444+t
l ee4-444 #4< 4+-a+ea ++++t1-Ak-44tc,14 .4rt-efact+-4+4+1 -el+tti++ 41+e-1, e.+++s-44(44\ c c+ t -6 4 N-1-1444€}
a -111'x-1:
4a4 a4<+a =e1+1(1ttt+++1F'a44 l?erlet
(4) 4 t+a=1++4t44e-44+++1-1- 444t4r 1 t+t 1+i 1+++4 +(a+e•
(-t--t 4 :1i+=4+ (3++i r s a++f1 �t+1414 +a ttt 4t+tii
4c4-1 -144t-14#i+4‘,,,AAat<.,++a-1-a++c1-tia4 +-4414.4-ip i-e444-.14441--S++1.1131 'r43ea1e+:
444 -V-i41t°u-4-e1€
(g)
4141 �4ca4 r+ t++c4 (1t+414i+a kztasM3F+e 4<+re
(44 4iia+=l-te4. Shop Etc +tt l+al+
44-4 1-1+414 X4441:--.144(1--Sk-i+4-> -44a- - S-<--}-itc,!.;
(4=0i --,i'-ear:Ind 1-ea41}ef.4--1Ho44 -44T41
(-14 t441+t'1-!4±, 4444 r4+41 1 i-i i+elf1-( -R,t..-3 it-a+le! N14 -4+t ++aix,t 4-1414-lo4-S4op
(4+++ "t+t++444+u“-x114-1.: 1-1o1+44v. 140(-1: fah
{-r: i 4-t 4-te a I 4t+<-°14a-at.14 cc
(444 -I et+a+4+:1t-21-t4-`.1-1—t
11'+ NL-i++ 414+14a-t,{-4++4):-a++e4-at+l4er- ofe-,:
4fti 1=1t -H-+4-`,
(+ 4 t-41-14(.141 44+441,.144(4 a ..144{4 4 ;414-..14,a++=.1,
4+- 4..- tot( -\.4 3=r4 4++11tie'--4}r+r
4, 4 4 i1-St31,141v
(4;4 .\a -44) +4t'+=
\_;
.�.1 4..3+1cr_4I-l— 43+}',3H(1-1114++4'3,+1 ` •r -
Section 835.03. Conditional Uses. al -at -1441e 1.-t++41 t 3+a+a++e+t 4,+I --1-1t-4441++ 14+ ++i;=+ 44
44;41,-«-t-tt+4 b -1.'04+414 4 onill -1114:1-H 1+141 1 111:
10110\1,1111.1 1,11111 1 hr: lit°1 14i11e1! +1 11 1_1111 114:.1 R('11 tli, 1 RRL •1113.1t'<'+ 1) (11110 1! 111.1t_t), 111111
;Approval. Ihc .t+rciii< 44 uirenknts r‘1 l!)1ishect i1) Scctio)4 +.431)4 4 1:1-111ge
lirnii uttuts +et 141144 Ito cin. and 1+41{1 .1441+11{ ihle pru r logs tat the eit+ t o(ic_
Ordinance No. ### 2 DRAFT - January 8, 2009
DATE
( 1) Condirorr l uses of the Cotnnleieial. Iii :hvyav fonnT dhs1'ic t. as describe() in Section
3N,_1 0 of_the city code- e`;cc n the follocc n1_ -shall 11(41 beducrntined 1Ises:
(a) Car y -ashes 01 auto jter40.1rnn
(b) )ay c fro° 1 +c duties
c) Ito it lls-_lend n _ri+ent set \ ices
4d) Hotc'Is,Motels
te) On s ale ligflor estahhslul eats
(ft R ,t tur.1n1.4
4u2) Sjiolts. health, and 1317\ sic 1I 1ltne s clubs
Outdoor such s agoll courses. d1 n
4-4) 1 t1 +l -51++1 -a+3tl-aitkuuil---Se-r-\-k€e l=te4- 11i-!ate,+s l+ei'lifi -4- ti -+l -4+tkt \'-l+tea+-;ikt' (-)-Veir
10.41444 c}++;+({ feet-af=lk k -tttc a-4+1 rd--t+f
-Nt+sializtl( �:ett r+na+_> lftile)
A.a,-x}-etty air -S -ho
E 1} 11+e ate t3tr te+iS-hoos
(-(+)-. --li)-a-ek-1.e l -is -en
Cr) -1-tot o i-t �iti1 tHf
( ) 111114,+++40-e Sck tc -St-ai -441 ria}k)1{++-1+tcl sl€t-)2+-ks}----k4the+k+1 , t t3 ),z+ksl,
l-)----1) r-i) - - 1-11 +t }cl FD++A4-e
;+t+cJ-1_-ahrie tt-ios+ Scr� ice I+ alas
1--1-a) la ++r t t� t+k++ ktii L 'ttte
(--1-2 Ektt+ t++< �++++k+r +t i ti
( I4)- +c' ala-lt iii-1-t)+-(itr-1-Fairs -s-- o a 40.())-IN-4dt;a+t•--re1
1-a+� l oTe- tl-c I>tk:i++c�:ti
E-1-v+-l-rk:-N+4+rt+ra+ttl-lszttll F+--St-a4i,..+a k
St &+
--1-
4 24.)-)
t%k',+ct
(2 1a 1-.4+144111+1u- t111+t akaor4{ai'-it-1-heo+1 .141-00
F_1tI'0404-+2 -H- 0-tE++trFrtt+
t2 )} 1-)' lcriali+++41-1-014 dyne ;=1;+a+ of
.10 r•
1)1+4 41112-
2,>,4--)
t- s41-k1a+rc+#k+c+tk++t+e a+-o-ts4et++131;--o1=tl+e-l4>I-k-+; 1-k+t+-1+=l4t-tntltn-41--ial p-r-4+tlt+cts-eat=atrtlitt_ H -o e -n-2
k++t+ 1a F--131 +}11-4
Ordinance No. ### 3 DRAFT — January 8, 2009
DATE
Comment [d3]: These uses are
cumntiy not permitted in RCH, but there
are existing non -conforming uses today.
Theoretically, the RCH district could
utilize the same list of uses as CH, and
the sanitary sewer usage regulations
could be left as the only limitation against
heavier water uses
Comment [d4]: These uses are
included in the existing RCH ordinance,
but not in the CH district. These could be
a logical short-term use of the popery
prior to utilities being staged. Should
these be included?
��i 1 4 x 1 4 1 e o ��- c ��1 r e t - i ��+ ��. 4 ��. ��. } r t ; + t i t ��H - 3 a } - I ��i e - t o + 1 ��{ ��e r ����- h + t r : '