Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutAgreement 2021-08-14 Cummins Cederberg SignedContract No. 2021-08-14 Page 1 of 40 CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF KEY BISCAYNE AND CUMMINS CEDERBERG, INC THIS AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made effective as of the day of , 2021 (the “Effective Date”), by and between the VILLAGE OF KEY BISCAYNE, FLORIDA, a Florida municipal corporation, (the “Village”), and CUMMINS CEDERBERG, INC, a Florida Corporation (hereinafter, the “Consultant”). WHEREAS, the Village desires certain professional architectural and engineering services; and WHEREAS, the Consultant will perform professional architectural and engineering services on behalf of the Village, all as further set forth in the Proposal dated February 12, 2021, attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” and the Scope of Services, attached hereto as Exhibit B” (the “Services”); and WHEREAS, the Consultant and Village, through mutual negotiation, have agreed upon a fee for the Services; and WHEREAS, the Village desires to engage the Consultant to perform the Services and provide the deliverables as specified below. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, the Consultant and the Village agree as follows: 1.Scope of Services. 1.1. The Contractor shall furnish the Services and provide deliverables for various project aspects for the Village (each a “Project”), as requested by the Village and detailed in a “Statement of Work” or “Statement of Work” which the Village will provide the Contractor when engaging the Contractor to work on a specific Project in a form 1.2. Prior to commencement of work on a specific Project, the Contractor will provide the Village with a fixed lump sum cost for the Services set forth in the Statement of Work calculated using the rates set forth on the Rate Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit “C.” 1.3. If the Village approves the fixed lump sum cost for the Project, the Village will provide the Contractor with a Notice to Proceed to perform the Services set forth in the Statement of 1st November Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 2 of 40 Work. Contractor acknowledges that it shall not undertake to perform any Services on any Project until it has received from the Village the Notice to Proceed on such Project. 1.4. Consultant shall furnish all reports, documents, and information obtained pursuant to this Agreement, and recommendations during the term of this Agreement (hereinafter “Deliverables”) to the Village. 1.5. The Contractor shall abide by the terms and requirements of the RFP, as though fully set forth herein. 2. Term/Commencement Date. 2.1. This Agreement shall become effective upon the Effective Date and shall remain in effect for through three (3) years thereafter, unless earlier terminated in accordance with Paragraph 8. Additionally, the Village Manager may renew this Agreement for two (2) additional one (1) year periods on the same terms as set forth herein upon written notice to the Contractor. 2.2. Contractor agrees that time is of the essence and Contractor shall complete the Services within the timeframes set forth in the Statement of Work and the Notice to Proceed for each Project in the manner provided in this Agreement, unless extended by the Village Manager. 3. Compensation and Payment. 3.1. Compensation for Services provided by Contractor shall be in accordance with the approved fixed lump sum set forth in the Statement of Work or the Notice to Proceed for such Project, which shall be based on the Rate Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit “C.” 3.2. During each Project, Consultant shall deliver an invoice to Village no more often than once per month detailing Services completed and the amount due to Consultant under the Statement of Work for such Project. Fees shall be paid in arrears each month, pursuant to Consultant’s invoice, which shall be based upon the percentage of work completed for each Project. The Village shall pay the Consultant in accordance with the Florida Prompt Payment Act after approval and acceptance of the Services by the Village Manager. 3.3. Contractor’s invoices must contain the following information for prompt payment: 3.3.1. Name and address of the Consultant; 3.3.2. Purchase Order number; 3.3.3. Contract number; 3.3.4. Date of invoice; 3.3.5. Invoice number (Invoice numbers cannot be repeated. Repeated invoice numbers will be rejected); Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 3 of 40 3.3.6. Name and type of Services; 3.3.7. Timeframe covered by the invoice; and 3.3.8. Total value of invoice. Failure to include the above information will result in the delay of payment or rejection of the invoice. All invoices must be submitted electronically to payables@keybiscayne.fl.gov. 4. Subcontractors. 4.1. The Contractor shall be responsible for all payments to any subcontractors and shall maintain responsibility for all work related to the Services and/or any Project. 4.2. Contractor may only utilize the services of a particular subcontractor with the prior written approval of the Village Manager, which approval shall be granted or withheld in the Village Manager’s sole and absolute discretion. 5. Village’s Responsibilities. 5.1. Village shall make available any maps, plans, existing studies, reports, staff and representatives, and other data pertinent to the Services and in possession of the Village, and provide criteria requested by Consultant to assist Consultant in performing the Services. 5.2. Upon Consultant’s request, Village shall reasonably cooperate in arranging access to public information that may be required for Consultant to perform the Services. 6. Consultant’s Responsibilities; Representations and Warranties. 6.1. The Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill and diligence in the performance of the Services as is ordinarily provided by a consultant under similar circumstances. If at any time during the term of this Agreement or within two (2) years from the completion of this Agreement, it is determined that the Consultant’s Deliverables or Services are incorrect, not properly rendered, defective, or fail to conform to Village requests, the Consultant shall at Consultant’s sole expense, immediately correct its Deliverables or Services. 6.2. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents that at all times during the term of this Agreement it shall maintain in good standing all required licenses, certifications and permits required under Federal, State and local laws applicable to and necessary to perform the Services for Village as an independent contractor of the Village. Consultant further warrants and represents that it has the required knowledge, expertise, and experience to perform the Services and carry out its obligations under this Agreement in a professional and first- class manner. 6.3. The Consultant represents that is an entity validly existing and in good standing under the laws of Florida. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 4 of 40 Consultant have been duly authorized, and this Agreement is binding on Consultant and enforceable against Consultant in accordance with its terms. No consent of any other person or entity to such execution, delivery and performance is required. 7. Conflict of Interest. 7.1. To avoid any conflict of interest or any appearance thereof, Consultant shall not, for the term of this Agreement, provide any consulting services to any private sector entities (developers, corporations, real estate investors, etc.), with any current, or foreseeable, adversarial issues in the Village. 8. Termination. 8.1. The Village Manager, without cause, may terminate this Agreement upon five (5) calendar days’ written notice to the Consultant, or immediately with cause. 8.2. Upon receipt of the Village's written notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately stop work on the project unless directed otherwise by the Village Manager. 8.3. In the event of termination by the Village, the Consultant shall be paid for all work accepted by the Village Manager up to the date of termination, provided that the Consultant has first complied with the provisions of Paragraph 8.4. 8.4. The Consultant shall transfer all books, records, reports, working drafts, documents, maps, and data pertaining to the Services and the project to the Village, in a hard copy and electronic format within fourteen (14) days from the date of the written notice of termination or the date of expiration of this Agreement. 9. Insurance. 9.1. Consultant shall secure and maintain throughout the duration of this agreement insurance of such types and in such amounts not less than those specified below as satisfactory to Village, naming the Village as an Additional Insured, underwritten by a firm rated A-X or better by A.M. Best and qualified to do business in the State of Florida. The insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to the Village, its officials, employees, agents, and volunteers naming the Village as additional insured. Any insurance maintained by the Village shall be in excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute to the Consultant’s insurance. The insurance coverages shall include at a minimum the amounts set forth in this section and may be increased by the Village as it deems necessary or prudent. 9.1.1. Commercial General Liability coverage with limits of liability of not less than a $1,000,000 per Occurrence combined single limit for Bodily Injury and Property Damage. This Liability Insurance shall also include Completed Operations and Product Liability coverages and eliminate the exclusion with respect to property under the care, custody and control of Consultant. The General Aggregate Liability limit and the Products/Completed Operations Liability Aggregate limit shall be in the amount of $2,000,000 each. Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 5 of 40 9.1.2. Workers Compensation and Employer’s Liability insurance, to apply for all employees for statutory limits as required by applicable State and Federal laws. The policy(ies) must include Employer’s Liability with minimum limits of $1,000,000.00 each accident. No employee, subcontractor or agent of the Consultant shall be allowed to provide Services pursuant to this Agreement who is not covered by Worker’s Compensation insurance. 9.1.3. Business Automobile Liability with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence, combined single limit for Bodily Injury and Property Damage. Coverage must be afforded on a form no more restrictive than the latest edition of the Business Automobile Liability policy, without restrictive endorsements, as filed by the Insurance Service Office, and must include Owned, Hired, and Non-Owned Vehicles. 9.1.4. Professional Liability Insurance in an amount of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, single limit. 9.2. Certificate of Insurance. Certificates of Insurance shall be provided to the Village, reflecting the Village as an Additional Insured (except with respect to Professional Liability Insurance and Worker’s Compensation Insurance), no later than ten (10) days after award of this Agreement and prior to the execution of this Agreement by Village and prior to commencing Services. Each certificate shall include no less than (30) thirty-day advance written notice to Village prior to cancellation, termination, or material alteration of said policies or insurance. The Consultant shall be responsible for assuring that the insurance certificates required by this Section remain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, including any extensions or renewals that may be granted by the Village. The Certificates of Insurance shall not only name the types of policy(ies) provided, but also shall refer specifically to this Agreement and shall state that such insurance is as required by this Agreement. The Village reserves the right to inspect and return a certified copy of such policies, upon written request by the Village. If a policy is due to expire prior to the completion of the Services, renewal Certificates of Insurance shall be furnished thirty (30) calendar days prior to the date of their policy expiration. Each policy certificate shall be endorsed with a provision that not less than thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice shall be provided to the Village before any policy or coverage is cancelled or restricted. Acceptance of the Certificate(s) is subject to approval of the Village. 9.3. Additional Insured. Except with respect to Professional Liability Insurance and Worker’s Compensation Insurance, the Village is to be specifically included as an Additional Insured for the liability of the Village resulting from Services performed by or on behalf of the Consultant in performance of this Agreement. The Consultant’s insurance, including that applicable to the Village as an Additional Insured, shall apply on a primary basis and any other insurance maintained by the Village shall be in excess of and shall not contribute to the Consultant’s insurance. The Consultant’s insurance shall contain a severability of interest provision providing that, except with respect to the total limits of liability, the insurance shall apply to each Insured or Additional Insured (for applicable policies) in the same manner as if separate policies had been issued to each. Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 6 of 40 9.4. Deductibles. All deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and be reasonably approved by the Village. The Consultant shall be responsible for the payment of any deductible or self-insured retentions in the event of any claim. 9.5. The provisions of this section shall survive termination of this Agreement. 10. Nondiscrimination. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any of its employees or applicants for employment because of their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, and will abide by all Federal and State laws regarding nondiscrimination. 11. Attorneys Fees and Waiver of Jury Trial. 11.1. In the event of any litigation arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its attorneys’ fees and costs, including the fees and expenses of any paralegals, law clerks and legal assistants, and including fees and expenses charged for representation at both the trial and appellate levels. 11.2. IN THE EVENT OF ANY LITIGATION ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT, EACH PARTY HEREBY KNOWINGLY, IRREVOCABLY, VOLUNTARILY AND INTENTIONALLY WAIVES ITS RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY. 12. Indemnification. 12.1. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the Village, its officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all demands, claims, losses, suits, liabilities, causes of action, judgment or damages, arising from Consultant’s performance or non- performance of any provision of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, liabilities arising from contracts between the Consultant and third parties made pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall reimburse the Village for all its expenses including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in and about the defense of any such claim or investigation and for any judgment or damages arising from Consultant’s performance or non-performance of this Agreement. 12.2. Nothing herein is intended to serve as a waiver of sovereign immunity by the Village nor shall anything included herein be construed as consent to be sued by third parties in any matter arising out of this Agreement or any other contract. The Village is subject to section 768.28, Florida Statutes, as may be amended from time to time. 12.3. The provisions of this section shall survive termination of this Agreement. 13. Notices/Authorized Representatives. Any notices required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been properly given if transmitted by hand-delivery, by registered or certified mail with postage prepaid return receipt requested, or by a private postal service, addressed to the parties (or their successors) at the addresses listed on the signature page of this Agreement or such other address as the party may have designated by proper notice. Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 7 of 40 14. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any proceedings arising out of this Agreement shall be proper exclusively in Miami-Dade County, Florida. 15. Entire Agreement/Modification/Amendment. 15.1. This writing contains the entire Agreement of the parties and supersedes any prior oral or written representations. No representations were made or relied upon by either party, other than those that are expressly set forth herein. 15.2. No agent, employee, or other representative of either party is empowered to modify or amend the terms of this Agreement, unless executed with the same formality as this document. 16. Ownership and Access to Records and Audits. 16.1. Consultant acknowledges that all inventions, innovations, improvements, developments, methods, designs, analyses, drawings, reports, compiled information, and all similar or related information (whether patentable or not) which relate to Services to the Village which are conceived, developed or made by Consultant during the term of this Agreement (“Work Product”) belong to the Village. Consultant shall promptly disclose such Work Product to the Village and perform all actions reasonably requested by the Village (whether during or after the term of this Agreement) to establish and confirm such ownership (including, without limitation, assignments, powers of attorney and other instruments). 16.2. Consultant agrees to keep and maintain public records in Consultant’s possession or control in connection with Consultant’s performance under this Agreement. The Village Manager or her designee shall, during the term of this Agreement and for a period of three (3) years from the date of termination of this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine and audit any records of the Consultant involving transactions related to this Agreement. Consultant additionally agrees to comply specifically with the provisions of Section 119.0701, Florida Statutes. Consultant shall ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed, except as authorized by law, for the duration of the Agreement, and following completion of the Agreement until the records are transferred to the Village. 16.3. Upon request from the Village’s custodian of public records, Consultant shall provide the Village with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided by Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, or as otherwise provided by law. 16.4. Unless otherwise provided by law, any and all records, including but not limited to reports, surveys, and other data and documents provided or created in connection with this Agreement are and shall remain the property of the Village. 16.5. Upon completion of this Agreement or in the event of termination by either party, any and all public records relating to the Agreement in the possession of the Consultant Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 8 of 40 shall be delivered by the Consultant to the Village Manager, at no cost to the Village, within seven (7) days. All such records stored electronically by Consultant shall be delivered to the Village in a format that is compatible with the Village’s information technology systems. Once the public records have been delivered upon completion or termination of this Agreement, the Consultant shall destroy any and all duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. 16.6. Any compensation due to Consultant shall be withheld until all records are received as provided herein. 16.7. Consultant’s failure or refusal to comply with the provisions of this section shall result in the immediate termination of this Agreement by the Village. 16.8. Notice Pursuant to Section 119.0701(2)(a), Florida Statutes. IF THE CONSULTANT HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONSULTANT’S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS. Custodian of Records: Jocelyn Brewster Koch Mailing address: 88 West McIntyre Street Key Biscayne, FL 33149 Telephone number: 305-365-5506 Email: jkoch@keybiscayne.fl.gov 17. Nonassignability. This Agreement shall not be assignable by Consultant unless such assignment is first approved by the Village Manager. The Village is relying upon the apparent qualifications and expertise of the Consultant, and such firm’s familiarity with the Village’s area, circumstances and desires. 18. Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement shall to any extent be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and each remaining term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and be enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 19. Independent Contractor. The Consultant and its employees, volunteers and agents shall be and remain an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the Village with respect to all of the acts and services performed by and under the terms of this Agreement. This Agreement shall not in any way be construed to create a partnership, association or any other kind of joint undertaking, enterprise or venture between the parties. Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 9 of 40 20. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and lawful orders of public authorities in carrying out Services under this Agreement, and in particular shall obtain all required permits from all jurisdictional agencies to perform the Services under this Agreement at its own expense. 21. Waiver. The failure of either party to this Agreement to object to or to take affirmative action with respect to any conduct of the other which is in violation of the terms of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the violation or breach, or of any future violation, breach or wrongful conduct. 22. Survival of Provisions. Any terms or conditions of either this Agreement that require acts beyond the date of the term of the Agreement, shall survive termination of the Agreement, shall remain in full force and effect unless and until the terms or conditions are completed and shall be fully enforceable by either party. 23. Prohibition of Contingency Fees. The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person(s), company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. 24. Public Entity Crimes Affidavit. Consultant shall comply with Section 287.133, Florida Statutes (Public Entity Crimes Statute), notification of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, including execution of any required affidavit. 25. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. 26. Conflicts; Order of Priority. This document without exhibits is referred to as the “Base Agreement.” In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Base Agreement and any exhibits or attachments hereto, or any documents incorporated herein by reference, the conflict shall be resolved in the following order of priorities and the more stringent criteria for performance of the Services shall apply: 26.1. First Priority: this Base Agreement; 26.2. Second Priority: Change Orders with later date taking precedence; 26.3. Third Priority: Exhibit C – Rate Schedule; 26.4. Fourth Priority: Exhibit B – Scope of Services; 26.5. Fifth Priority: Exhibit A – Consultant’s Proposal; and 26.6. Sixth Priority: Work Orders, with later date taking precedence. 27. E-Verify Affidavit. In accordance with Section 448.095, Florida Statutes, the Village requires all contractors doing business with the Village to register with and use the E-Verify system to verify the work authorization status of all newly hired employees. The Village will not enter into a contract unless each party to the contract registers with and uses the E-Verify system. The contracting entity must provide of its proof of enrollment in E-Verify. For instructions on how to provide proof of the contracting entity’s participation/enrollment in E-Verify, please Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 10 of 40 visit: https://www.e-verify.gov/faq/how-do-i-provide-proof-of-my-participationenrollment- in-e-verify. By entering into this Agreement, the Contractor acknowledges that it has read Section 448.095, Florida Statutes; will comply with the E-Verify requirements imposed by Section 448.095, Florida Statutes, including but not limited to obtaining E-Verify affidavits from subcontractors; and has executed the required affidavit attached hereto and incorporated herein. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] VULUOlyll CIIVCIupe IU. JLIJUI-41 O-LJ 1 1 + 11 L-P%P1U 1-uOJOUrr:JCOJI. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year as first stated above. VILLAGE OF KEY BISCAYNE DotuSigned by: /1i !' ShMU& C lNllA.lA.t41S171A, By. l crr,,coari37oMA4:o.. Steven C. Williamson Village Manager Attest: By: Jocelyn rewster Village Jerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: CONSULTANT By: Name: 31` 0.+Lw '_2 L 1 f �a2I� Title: ' 0'"" n t d tx."04:f.:0 5 /€ gle.c. rr3.. i By: f :. otice: Village Attomey `• g QopaoCr X2/7 Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L. Addresses for Notice: Village of Key Biscayne Attn: Village Manager 88 West McIntyre Street Key Biscayne, FL 33149 305-365-5514 (telephone) 305-365-8936 (facsimile) aagha@keybiscayne.fl.gov (email) With a copy to: Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L. Attn: Chad Friedman, Esq. Village of Key Biscayne Attorney 2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 700 Coral Gables, FL 33134 cfriedman@wsh-law.com (email) SQ e 1t NA:A. rc£ 33 /yj 305-7V- g /S. (telephone) (facsimile) vtfr oe c..... vt.Yr14 tt5 (email) cecterb¢ .0 wt With a copy to: c�ael.`at4- 305-1-46-5-02 (telephone) (facsimile) lo /1- email) G� S e --4C (, t - Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 11 of 40 E -VERIFY AFFIDAVIT In accordance with Section 448.095, Florida Statutes, the Village requires all contractors doing business with the Village to register with and use the E -Verify system to verify the work authorization status of all newly hired employees. The Village will not enter into a contract unless each party to the contract registers with and uses the E -Verify system. The contracting entity must provide of its proof of enrollment in E -Verify. For instructions on how to provide proof of the contracting entity's participation/enrollment in E -Verify, please visit: hUps _llwww.e-verify.go vlfagihow-do-i-provide-proof-of mv-participationsnrollment-in-e-verify By signing below, the contracting entity acknowledges that it has read Section 448.095, Florida Statutes and will comply with the E -Verify requirements imposed by it, including but not limited to obtaining E -Verify affidavits from subcontractors. Check here to confirm proof of enrollment in E -Verify has been attached to this Affidavit. ence of: Signed, sealed end delivered by: Witness 1 Print Name: nied4R.fit.iaRIC() C4ha<0o Print Name: U c aw c /16,e' Title: Pig k Entity Name: etc -01.4.74 -A -+V - c: Witness #2 Print Name:1.0).0 State of Florida County of l,`'Itq.rn,i-- '�- ACKNOWLEDGMENT The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of 11 physical presence or El online notarization, this 1 ' day of, , 20A\ , by nt12 - L c ( e of person) as cttickr1k (type of authority) for Lo ryNcyY i n5 ttInC. (name of party on behalf of whom instrument is executed). No Commissi Personally known to me; or Produced identification (Type of Identification: ) Did take an oath; or Did not take an oath Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 12 of 40 8/23/2021 My Company Profile | E-Verify https://everify.uscis.gov/account/company/profile 1/3 My Company My Company Prole Company Information An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know Company Name Cummins Cederberg, Inc. Doing Business As (DBA) Cummins Cederberg, Inc. Company ID 1606476 Enrollment Date 11/10/2020 Employer ID Number 272129033 DUNS Number 962526153 Total Number of Employees 20 to 99 NAICS Code 541 Sector Menu 8/23/2021 My Company Profile | E-Verify https://everify.uscis.gov/account/company/profile 2/3 Edit Company Information Employer Category Employer Category None of these categories apply Edit Employer Category Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Subsector Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Company Locations Edit Company Locations Physical Address 7550 Red Road Suite 217 South Miami, FL 33143 Mailing Address Same as Physical Address Hiring Sites We have implemented a new policy and require more information for existing and future hiring sites. 8/23/2021 My Company Profile | E-Verify https://everify.uscis.gov/account/company/profile 3/3 Company Access and MOU U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Accessibility Plug-ins Edit Hiring Sites Number of Sites 1 My Company is Configured to: Verify Its Own Employees Use Web Services Memorandum of Understanding View Current MOU EXHIBIT “A” CONSULTANT’S PROPOSAL Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 13 of 40 CUMMINS CEDERBERG, INC. ▪ South Miami ▪ Fort Lauderdale ▪ Jupiter ▪ Tallahassee ▪ www.CumminsCederberg.com February 12, 2021 Attn: Village of Key Biscayne 88 West McIntyre Street, # 100 Key Biscayne, FL, 33149 RE: Response to Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 – Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services – Coastal Engineering Dear Village Council Members, Cummins Cederberg, Inc. (Cummins Cederberg) is pleased to submit this RFQ response to provide Continuing Architectural and Engineering Services to the Village of Key Biscayne (Village) for your review and consideration. We acknowledge receipt of Addendum 1 and all information that has been provided, and we are excited for the opportunity to present our firm’s qualifications. We are motivated to develop a long-term relationship with the Village as a trusted consultant to provide coastal engineering services. We have reviewed and understand the scope of work to be performed and are familiar with the Village’s past coastal engineering projects. It is our understanding that the Village plans to issue work orders for architectural and engineering services, and we are confident that the team at Cummins Cederberg can meet the Village’s coastal engineering needs and exceed the Village’s expectations. Cummins Cederberg provides our clients with technical services in coastal and marine engineering and environmental consulting. We have been providing these services over the last 11 years to public-sector clients, which include local, state, and federal agencies. Coastal Engineering Capabilities Cummins Cederberg focuses exclusively on the coastal and marine environments. Our professional team is comprised of coastal engineers, marine structural engineers, resiliency and adaptation specialists, marine biologists, regulatory and policy experts, marine scientists, and surveyors, with proven experience in all facets of environmental planning, regulatory permitting, and coastal management. Our foundation was built on expertise in the coastal and marine environment, and Cummins Cederberg remains at the forefront of scientific research and implementation in this constantly evolving industry. This exclusive focus allows us to thrive in the coastal and marine sector without diluting knowledge or resources amongst other disciplines. As a certified small business, clients work directly with our experienced senior engineers and environmental managers who dedicate themselves to providing a superior level of responsiveness and quality deliverables. Our engineers, regulatory experts, and marine scientists bring unrivaled qualifications and experience working in marine and coastal environments and are recognized in the industry for their knowledge and proficiency. We are proud to have several former regulators on staff, which brings unmatched insight into CUMMINS CEDERBERG, INC. ▪ South Miami ▪ Fort Lauderdale ▪ Jupiter ▪ Tallahassee ▪ www.CumminsCederberg.com the environmental regulatory permitting process. This includes senior staff from all environmental agencies typically issuing environmental permits for coastal and marine projects within the Village (i.e. DERM, DEP, USACE and SFWMD). We work very closely with our clients to understand their needs, quickly identify resolutions, execute projects cost-effectively, and deliver projects on time. Our Coastal Engineering Areas of Services Include: ✓ Beach Nourishment ✓ Shoreline Protection ✓ Numerical Modeling ✓ FEMA Flood Mapping ✓ Coastal Erosion Studies ✓ Dredging Design ✓ Inlet Management ✓ Turtle & Shorebird Monitoring ✓ Coastal Structure Design ✓ Sea Level Rise Planning ✓ Scour Analyses ✓ Coastal Resiliency ✓ Regulatory Permitting ✓ Marine Resources Surveys ✓ Construction Management ✓ Underwater Inspections ✓ Living Shorelines ✓ Aerial Drone Surveys ✓ Infrastructure Planning Our headquarter is in Miami-Dade County, and 28 of our 31 staff members are based in Southeast Florida, providing the Village accessibility to experts intimately familiar with the region and the unique character and location of the Village. As an example, we recently completed a sea level rise adaption capital improvement plan for Crandon Park with components that will be directly applicable to the Village. Our project experience and staff qualifications listed within this response demonstrates a team with the capabilities to manage and execute projects from start to finish involving permitting and permit compliance, data collection and analysis, public outreach, plans and specifications, reporting, construction management, project monitoring, coastal engineering design, and value engineering. We appreciate the opportunity to submit our qualifications and stand by ready to assist the Village through execution of work orders developed pursuant to this RFQ. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 305-741-6155 or jcederberg@CumminsCederberg.com. Sincerely, CUMMINS CEDERBERG, INC. Jannek Cederberg, MSc, PE President INSR ADDL SUBR LTR INSR WVD DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: FAXPHONE (A/C, No):(A/C, No, Ext): E-MAIL ADDRESS: INSURER A : INSURED INSURER B : INSURER C : INSURER D : INSURER E : INSURER F : POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXPTYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # Y / N N / A (Mandatory in NH) ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED $PREMISES (Ea occurrence)CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ $ PRO- OTHER: LOCJECT COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $(Ea accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ANY AUTO OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $AUTOS ONLY AUTOS AUTOS ONLY HIRED PROPERTY DAMAGE $AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) $ OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION $$ PER OTH- STATUTE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ If yes, describe under E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below POLICY NON-OWNED SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer any rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:REVISION NUMBER: CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORDACORD 25 (2016/03) ACORDTM CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE Phoenix Insurance Company Travelers Property Cas. Co. of America Travelers Casualty and Surety Company Berkley Insurance Company 9/28/2020 USI Insurance Services, LLC 2502 N Rocky Point Drive Suite 400 Tampa, FL 33607 813 321-7500 Cummins Cederberg, Inc. 7550 Red Road, Suite 217 South Miami, FL 33143 25623 25674 19038 32603 A X X X X X 6604H492215 07/23/2020 07/23/2021 1,000,000 1,000,000 10,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 A X X X X X BA6P691687 07/23/2020 07/23/2021 1,000,000 B X X X 10,000 X X CUP4R149675 09/25/2020 07/23/2021 2,000,000 2,000,000 C X UB5J81862A 09/26/2020 09/26/2021 X 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 D Professional Liability AEC903572301 03/30/2020 03/30/2021 $5,000,000 per claim $5,000,000 annl aggr. Professional Liability coverage is written on a claims-made basis. For Proposal Purposes 1 of 1 #S29959676/M29951866 CUMMICEDClient#: 1054258 DVPZP 1 of 1 #S29959676/M29951866 CUMMINS 1 CEDERBERG Coastal & Marine Engineering Litigation & Warranty Statement February 11, 2021 Cummins Cederberg, Inc. (Cummins Cederberg) hereby certifies that no litigation or regulatory action has been filed against our firm in the last three (3) years. Cummins Cederberg also certifies that we are not insolvent, not in bankruptcy or receivership, and not engaged or threatened with litigation that would affect our ability to perform obligations for the Village. We appreciate the opportunity to submit our qualifications and stand by ready to assist the Village. Should you have any question or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 305-741- 6155. Sincerely, CUMMINS CEDERBERG, INC. Jannek Cederberg, PE President ° \f‘ 4 -OF far r �s� Notary Public State of Florida Susan E Benitez My Commission GG 242903 Expires 0912812022 /202-1 Litigation Statement Page 1 Form AA  ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM  Solicitation Title: ________________________   Solicitation No.:   ________________________   Listed below are the dates of issue for each Addendum received in connection with this Solicitation:  Addendum No. ________, Dated  Addendum No. ________, Dated _________  Addendum No. ________, Dated _________  Addendum No. ________, Dated _________  Addendum No. ________, Dated _________  Addendum No. ________, Dated _________  Addendum No. ________, Dated _________  Addendum No. ________, Dated _________  Addendum No. ________, Dated _________  Addendum No. ________, Dated _________  Addendum No. ________, Dated _________  ☐No Addendum issued for this Solicitation Firm’s Name:     Authorized Representative’s Name:   Title:     Authorized Signature:    CONTINUING ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES VILLAGE OF KEY BISCAYNE No. 2021-08 1 Cummins Cederberg Inc. Jannek Cederberg, PE President January 27, 2021 VILLAGE OF KEY BISCAYNE RFQ 2021-08 Continuing Architectural and Engineering Services Addendum #1 Due Date: February 12, 2021 This addendum is incorporated into and made a part of the above referenced solicitation. The following may include clarifications, revisions, additions, deletions, or answers to questions received relative to the solicitation, which take precedence over the solicitation documents. Underlined word(s) indicate additions. Deletions are indicated by strikethrough. Clarifications: 1. The Proposal deadline is hereby extended to February 12, 2021, at 4:00 PM. 2. Section 9.1.4 of the Contract (Insurance) is hereby revised as follows: "Professional Liability Insurance in an amount of not less than One Three Million Dollars ($43,000,000.00) per occurrence claim made, single limit." 3. Several questions have arisen with respect to subcontracting under each discipline for this solicitation. To simplify matters, the Village is permitting subcontracting under the following disciplines: a. Architecture b. Civil Engineering c. Construction Engineering & Inspection d. Urban Planning Subcontracting will not be considered for all other disciplines. 4. Submission requirements on the Procurement Portal were revised to remove the "Personnel Qualifications" section. The matter requested was already covered by the Questionniare and the "Organizational Chart" and "Resumes for Key Staff' sections. 5. Proposers may include up to two page resumes for the Contract Manager and Project Manager. Questions and Answers 1. Contract, Section 9 (Insurance): Section 9.1.4 provides that Proposer must have "Professional Liability Insurance in an amount of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, single limit". As a professional consultant, Proposer's professional liability insurance policy is a "claims made" policy that is renewed annually. Consultant does not, and never has, purchased an "occurrence" professional liability insurance policy. Proposer respectfully requests the Village issue a correction, modification, or amendment to the Contract to allow the Consultant to satisfy the professional liability insurance requirement through a "claims made" policy. Response: See clarification 2 above. 2. Is the Contract Manager and Project Manager considered to be Key Staff positions? Response: Yes. RFQ 2021-08 Continuing A & E Services Addendum #1 Date Posted: 1/27/2021 Page 1 of 7 3. In the Key Staff Questionnaire, the form only allows for up to ten (10) key staff members. Are Proposers limited to providing only ten (10) key staff members? Response: No, Proposers may have additional key staff members. If so, provide an attachment in "Questionnaire Attachments" providing the same information for each additional key staff member. 4. How many total Key Staff resumes are you requiring Proposers to provide? Are you only looking for one (1) key staff resume per category of service that the Offeror is submitting for ? Response: Proposers are to submit one resume for each Key Staff member. 5. Are Proposers required to submit qualifications that are inclusive of all twelve (12) service categories, or are Proposers only required to submit qualifications on the service categories of their choosing? Response: Proposers should treat each discipline as though it were a separate proposal. Proposers may submit the same matter in different disciplines if the matter is relevant to both. For example: Proposer may use the same letter of intent in multiple disciplines. The submission requirements are broken out to be modular, allowing the Proposer to modify the discipline specific matter while resubmitting other duplicated proposal elements. Proposer's are only required to submit for the disciplines of their choosing. 6. On the Questionnaire, Question Set 2 (Client References), is it permissible to use Village of Key Biscayne work as one of the reference projects and use a Village employee as the reference contact? Response: Yes. 7. It is understood that only resumes/qualifications for Contract Manager, Project Manager, and ten (10) Key Personnel. Can additional personnel names be included on the Organizational Chart to illustrate depth of resources, or should we limit our organizational chart to the personnel above? Response: See response to Question 3 above. The organizational chart may include additional personnel. 8. RFQ page 13, item D(a) and D(b) request sections from our questionnaire. Please confirm whether it is necessary to upload the Questionnaire twice or can it be taken from the original Questionnaire upload. Response: These items are included in the Questionnaire. Proposers only need to upload the Questionnaire once. 9. RFQ pages 13 and 14, items C, D, and E each request multiple items (a., b., c.). For example, D Personnel Qualifications, subsection D requests one -page resumes for Key Personnel, and subsection E requests a resume for the Contract Manager. Should the files for subsection D be submitted as a separate PDF from the files for subsection E, or should all content for the major categories be submitted as a single PDF for each section? Response: Where the submission requirements call for specific elements, those should be submitted separately. For example: 3.4D(c) Organizational Chart should be submitted on its own, whereas items 3.4E(a)-(c) should be submitted together in a single pdf. 10. RFP page 13 identifies Section D. Personnel Qualifications, which requests an Organizational Chart and resumes for Key Staff, C.M., and P.M. The upload site on Bonfire has an upload section for Personnel Qualifications, but also has one for "Organizational Chart" and one for "Resumes of Key Staff". Should the Organizational Chart and resumes for Personnel Qualifications be uploaded, as stated in the RFP? If so, should we repeat in the upload sections for Organization RFQ 2021-08 Continuing A & E Services Addendum #1 Date Posted: 1/27/2021 Page 2 of 7 VILLAGE OF KEY B ISCA Y N E Chart and Resumes of Key Staff? Conversely, if we are to upload or Organizational Chart section and the resumes to Resumes for Key Staff section, what do we upload to the Personnel Qualifications section? Response: See clarification 4 above. 11. Should we include sub -consultants at this phase of the Procurement process or add them to our team after selection and consultation with the Village on an as -needed basis? Response: See clarification 3 above. 12. Is the Village looking to contract three (3) firms to provide all twelve (12) disciplines, or three (3) firms per discipline? Response: The Village is seeking to establish contracts in each discipline. The Village reserves the right to award or not award as many contracts as it deems appropriate. 13. Who are the incumbents of this contract? Response: Calvin Giordano & Assoc., EAC Consulting, and The Corradino Group 14. Is it possible to be a sub -consultant on a team providing certain disciplines and also pursue those same disciplines separately as a prime consultant? Response: No. If you submit as a prime in any discipline, your firm cannot be a subconsultant on another proposal within that same discipline. 15. Please elaborate on the Sustainability Consulting discipline; do Resilience Design and Sea Level Rise consulting fall under this category? Response: No. 16. Our company name is a re -branding of its previous name, but the company has been in continuous operation providing Architectural and Engineering services for approximately thirty (30) years. Does this satisfy Section 3.2 (1)? Response: If the firm was renamed and the renaming was filed with the State of Florida, and not a new entity, this is acceptable. The firm will need to submit proof that the firm's renaming has been filed with Florida's Division of Corporations. 17. What is the length of the contract term? Response: The initial term is three years with two one-year options that the Village may exercise. 18. If a firm is requesting consideration for multiple disciplines, is it necessary to submit separate complete packages, or can all the disciplines be separated by tabs within one package? Response: It is necessary to submit separate complete packages. However, duplicative matter may be reuploaded to different disciplines. 19. Are sub -consultants permitted, and if so, are they to be included at this time or after selection, if necessary? Response: See clarification 3 above. To the extent practicable, proposed subconsultants should be included at this time. 20. Can the Contract Manager and the Project Manager be the same person? Response: Yes. RFQ 2021-08 Continuing A & E Services Addendum #1 Date Posted: 1/27/2021 Page 3 of 7 VILLAGE OF KEY BISCA YNEE 21. Could the Village please provide their definition of what the Contract Manager would be? Response: The Contract Manager would be the point of contact for the Village on all matters related to the contract. The Village would prefer having a single point of contact rather than communicating with several project managers. 22. Wastewater Engineering is referenced as a Commodity Code but is not listed under any of the Category Scopes. Will the Village be selecting Wastewater Engineers? Response: No. 23. Will the Village ensure us that the firm's financial information will be confidential and not part of the public record? Response: Yes. Proposers must ensure all financial information is marked conspicuously with the label "Confidential." 24. Does the Village have a CIP or proposed list of projects to be undertaken as part of this RFQ? Response: The Village's lates Capital Improvements Plan was included in its FY2021 Budget posted on the Village website under Budget/CIP Documents. The Village also recently got approval of a $100M bond. Project information supporting the bond was posted to vkbresilience.org. Finally, the intention of these contracts are to use them for any upcoming project that the Village acquires in the next five (5) years that fall within the CCNA limits (under $4M construction cost or $500k study activity). 25. Does the Village intend to have separate evaluation committees for each discipline? Response: The Village will have the same evaluation committee for all disciplines, however, they will evaluate and rank each discipline separately. 26. Item K., Litigation Statement in the RFQ states that the respondent must complete and submit the Dispute Disclosure Questionnaire. This form is not attached to the RFQ or posted as a form in the Procurement portal. Could the questionnaire be posted or information be provided on where to locate it? Response: Question Set 3 of the Questionnaire is the Dispute Disclosure Questionnaire. In addition to those questions, Item K requires Proposer to provide a signed notarized statement declaring under penalty of perjury that no litigation or regulatory action has been filed against Proposer's firm in the last three (3) years. There is no form for this statement, it must be written, notarized, and submitted by the Proposer. 27. Sections 4.1 Attachments: the RFQ states that exhibits are attached, but they are not. Could Exhibits B, C, and D be posted? Response: Exhibit B will be the Respondent's Proposal attached after selection, Exhibit C is the Wage Rates, which will be negotiated after the selection, and Exhibit D is the Sample Work Order. Blank copies of all documents are attached to Attachment A- Draft Agreement and will be completed after the selection and negotiation process. 28. Can an individual staff member's experience be used to meet the following requirement: "Respondent must have successfully completed at least three (3) municipal projects within the relevant discipline, demonstrated through three (3) verifiable client references from different entities, within the past five (5) years prior to the issuance of this RFQ? Response: No. RFQ 2021-08 Continuing A & E Services Addendum #1 Date Posted: 1/27/2021 Page 4 of 7 llS k Y•,�rYr rA VILLAGE OF KEY BICAY T E 29. The Client References Questionnaire states, « Respondent may not use the same reference for more than one (1) project/contract". Does this mean that two (2) separate projects/contracts containing the same client contact/reference are not allowed? Response: Yes. 30. For Key Staff Questionnaire/Resumes, does the Village want us to submit staff/resumes from Proposed Subcontractors, and if yes, can more that ten (10) Key Staff members be listed? Response: Yes, if they are included as Key Staff members. 31. As specific Task Orders have not been defined, can the "appropriate percentage of the work to be performed" be submitted as TBD? Response: Yes. Proposers may also input N/A. 32. Can multiple potential subcontractors for the same discipline be submitted, as their use would be dependent on a Task Order's scope and timing? Response: Yes. 33. Under "Eligibility", the RFQ states, "Respondent must have successfully completed AT LEAST three (3) municipal projects within the relevant discipline, demonstrated through three (3) verifiable client references from different entities, within the past five (5) years prior to the issuance of this RFQ". The Excel form only has space for three (3) client references. Is a firm permitted to submit more than three (3) examples of past experience / references? If yes, where shall these be submitted in the portal —as an attachment to the Questionnaire? Response: For qualification purposes, please only submit three client references. Proposers are encouraged to include project and contact information with their client list. 34. Does the Village require each staff member's resume uploaded as a separate file or can they be submitted in one PDF document? Response: Either method is acceptable. 35. Which discipline would be relevant for Geospatial and Subsurface Utility Engineering to be bid under for this solicitation? Or, will those disciplines be part of a forthcoming solicitation if the Village seeks those services? Response: Civil Engineering. 36. Upon completing a submittal, if for example a Landscape Architect may involve a Civil Engineer, would it be the Village's expectation to put a team together for Civil Engineering as part of the submittal? Response: No, it would not be necessary. 37. The Village has be open to negotiating some of the contract language in the past, including the broad form indemnification. Would this still be an option? Response: Should there be any comments a firm has regarding the contract, they may be added to the firm's proposal and submitted. A firm cannot make their proposal contingent upon acceptance of alternate conditions to the contract. 38. Our firm has a broad spectrum of services that are provided. If, for example, we were to submit a proposal for Civil Engineering and Landscape Architecture, would Landscape Architecture need to have its own Project Manager or could it be managed by the Civil Engineer's Project Manager? RFQ 2021-08 Continuing A & E Services Addendum #1 Date Posted: 1/27/2021 Page 5 of 7 VILLAGE OF KEY BISCCA Y t' E Response: It is the Village's preference to have only one Contract Manager instead of numerous Managers, however that would be allowed. 39. Our firm is primarily a Transportation Engineering firm, however we also provide Structural Design, Electrical Design, Stormwater, and Water and Sewer Services. At this point we are not certain how many specialties we are going to submit for, but will probably be between four (4) and six (6) specialties. Should our firm provide an Organizational Chart for every specialty , or provide just one (1) Organizational Chart with different modules depending on the specialty we are submitting for? Response: The firm can provide one (1) Organizational Chart that is all-inclusive and upload it to each specialty the firm is submitting for. 40. Due to the fact that there are many points on criteria for Personnel and the Project and Contract Managers, would it be acceptable to submit two (2) page resumes for Personnel, instead of one? Response: Yes. See clarification 5 above. 41. There are disciplines listed for Design and for Project/Construction Management. If a firm is selected to perform the Design, would that firm be allowed to perform Design Management and Construction Management, or does that preclude them? Response: No, it is not precluded. However, on some projects, the Village may request one firm to perform the design and another to perform project/construction management. 42. Are there any additional vendor registration requirements with the Village, aside from registering on Bonfire? Response: No, the only additional items the Village would require would be the firm's W9 and insurance once the firm is awarded a contract. 43. Within Section 3.4, Response/Qualifications Package/Requirements, after subsection F (Insurance), it skips to subsection K (Litigation Statement) in the RFQ. Is this a typo or are there missing subsections for G through J? Response: This is a clerical error. Proposers should ignore the missing subsection letters. 44. Would the Village allow a larger Civil Engineering firm team up with a smaller Civil Engineering firm as a subconsultant to strengthen their resources? Response: Yes. 45. Usually we team up as part of an Architectural team for MEP and Fire Protection disciplines. Would the Village require us to submit a proposal separately for MEP and Fire Protection separately and not underneath the Architectural team? Would we have to submit our services as a sub -consultant? Response: You may submit as a subconsultant to the Architectural firm where the Architectural firm serves as prime in the Architectural discipline. However, if your firm desires to submit as prime in the MEP discipline as well, it is free to do so. 46. If a firm provides MEP services, would there be one separate submission for each (Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing)? Response: No, MEP services can be submitted under one proposal. RFQ 2021-08 Continuing A & E Services Addendum #1 Date Posted: 1/27/2021 Page 6 of 7 Jannek Cederberg, PE President 02/11/2021 Cummins Cederberg, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY (IF CORPORATION) 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Cummins Cederberg, inr. , a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida , held on the 21day of January , 2021, a resolution was duly passed and adopted authorizing (Name) Jannek Cederbbere, PE as (Title) President of the corporation to execute bids on behalf of the corporation and providing that his/her execution thereof, attested by the secretary of the corporation, shall be the official act and deed of the corporation. I further certify that said resolution remains in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 71 , day of January , 2021 Secretary: President: Print Name: Jason _ mins, PE Print Name: Jannek Cederber e, P (41-401-dr CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY (IF PARTNERSHIP) HEREBY CERTIFY that at a meeting of the Partners of , a partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of , held on the _day of a resolution was duly passed and adopted authorizing (Name) as (Title) of the to execute bids on behalf of the partnership and provides that his/her execution thereof, attested by a partner, shall be the official act and deed of the partnership. further certify that said partnership agreement remains in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this , day of , 20 Partner: Partner: Print Name: Print Name: Form COA ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of j County of tkiCG'i,e+`� On this day of ,x'110. ovally _per appeared _ , 20 , before me the undersigned, whose name(s) is/are o the within instrument, and he/she/they acknowledge that he/she/they executed it. Witness niy hand and official seal: Notary Public State of Ftonda 4 Romina Guido r My Commission GG 950 259 Expires U iU9 ! u 4 Notary Public (Print, Stamp, or Type as Commissioned) Personally known to me; or Produced identification (Type of Identification: Did take an oath; or Did not take an oath Form COA } Form CD FORM CD COMPANY DECLARATION FORM I certify that any and all information contained in this Response is true. I certify that this Response is made without prior understanding, agreement, or connections with any corporation, firm or person submitting a Response for the same materials, supplies, equipment, or services and is in all respects fair and without collusion or fraud. I agree to abide by all terms and conditions of the solicitation and certify that I am authorized to sign for the Respondent's firm. Please print the following and sign your name: FIRM NAME PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRFESS TELEPHONE EMAIL ADDRESS FEDERAL I.D. NO. MUNICIPAL BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT OR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE NO. NAME TITLE AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE Cummins Cederberg, Inc. 7550 Red Road, Suite 217, South Miami, FL, 33143 +1 305-741-6155 FACSIMILE jcederberg@cumminscederberg.com Jannek Cederberg, PE President 27-2129033 +1 305-974-1969 6874342 Form SEA FORM SEA SINGLE EXECUTION AFFIDAVITS THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND SWORN TO IN THE PRESENCE OF A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICIAL AUTHORIZED TO ADMINISTER OATHS. THIS FORM COMBINES SEVERAL AFFIDAVIT STATEMENTS TO BE SWORN TO BY THE PROPOSER OR BIDDER AND NOTARIZED BELOW. IN THE EVENT THE PROPOSER OR BIDDER CANNOT SWEAR TO ANY OF THESE AFFIDAVIT STATEMENTS, THE PROPOSER OR BIDDER IS DEEMED TO BE NON-RESPONSIBLE AND IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO SUBMIT A PROPOSAL/BID. THESE SINGLE EXECUTION AFFIDAVITS ARE SUBMITTED TO THE VILLAGE OF KEY BISCAYNE AND ARE STATEMENTS MADE: By: For (Name of Proposing or Bidding Entity): Whose business address is: And (if applicable) its Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN) is: (if the entity does not have an FEIN, include the Social Security Number of the individual signing this sworn statement. SS#: ) Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Affidavit The above named firm, corporation or organization is in compliance with and agrees to continue to comply with, and assure that any subcontractor, or third party contractor under this project complies with all applicable requirements of the laws listed below including, but not limited to, those provisions pertaining to employment, provision of programs and services, transportation, communications, access to facilities, renovations, and new construction. •The American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), Pub. L. 101-336, 104 Stat 327, 42 USC 1210112213 and 47 USC Sections 225 and 661 including Title I, Employment; Title II, Public Services; Title III, Public Accommodations and Services Operated by Private entities; Title IV, Telecommunications; and Title V, Miscellaneous Provisions. •The Florida Americans with Disabilities Accessibility Implementation Act of 1993, Section 553.501- 553.513, Florida Statutes: •The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 229 USC Section 794; •The Federal Transit Act, as amended 49 USC Section 1612; •The Fair Housing Act as amended 42 USC Section 3601-3631. __________ Proposer Initials Jannek Cederberg, PE Cummins Cederberg, Inc. 7550 Red Road, Suite 217, South Miami, FL, 33143 27-2129033 Form SEA Public Entity Crimes Affidavit I understand that a “public entity crime” as defined in Paragraph 287.133(1)(g), Florida Statutes, means a violation of any state or federal law by a person with respect to and directly related to the transaction of business with any public entity or with an agency or political subdivision of any other state or of the United States, including but not limited to, any bid or contract for goods or services to be provided to any public entity or an agency or political subdivision of any other state or of the United States and involving antitrust, fraud, theft, bribery, collusion, racketeering, conspiracy, or material misrepresentations. I understand that “convicted” or “conviction” as defined in Paragraph 287.133(1)(b), Florida Statutes, means a finding of guilt or a conviction of a public entity crime, with or without an adjudication of guilt, in any federal or state trial court of record relating to charges brought by indictment or information after July 1, 1989, as a result of a jury verdict, non-jury trial, or entry of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere. I understand that an “affiliate” as defined in Paragraph 287.133(1)(a), Florida Statutes, means: 1.A predecessor or successor of a person convicted of a public entity crime; or 2.An entity under the control of any natural person who is active in the management of the entity and who has been convicted of a public entity crime. The term “affiliate” includes those officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, and agents who are active in the management of an affiliate. The ownership by one person of shares constituting a controlling interest in another person, or a pooling of equipment or income among persons when not for fair market value under an arm’s length agreement, shall be a prima facie case that one person controls another person. A person who knowingly enters into a joint venture with a person who has been convicted of a public entity crime in Florida during the preceding 36 months shall be considered an affiliate. I understand that a “person” as defined in Paragraph 287.133(1)(e), Florida Statutes, means any natural person or entity organized under the laws of any state or of the United States with the legal power to enter into a binding contract and which bids or applies to bid on contracts for the provision of goods or services let by a public entity, or which otherwise transacts or applies to transact business with a public entity. The term “person” includes those officers, directors, executives, and partners, shareholders, employees, members, and agents who are active in management of an entity. Based on information and belief, the statement, which I have marked below, is true in relations to the entity submitting this sworn statement. (INDICATE WHICH STATEMENT APPLIES.) [ ] Neither the entity submitting this sworn statement, nor any of its officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are active in the management of the entity, nor any affiliate of the entity has been charged with ad convicted of a public entity crime subsequent to July 1, 1989. [ ] The entity submitting this sworn statement, or one or more of its officers, directors, executives, Form SEA partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are active in the management of the entity, or an affiliate of the entity has been charged with and convicted of a public entity crime subsequent to July 1, 1989. [ ] The entity submitting this sworn statement, or one or more of its officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are active in the management of the entity, or an affiliate of the entity has been charged with and convicted of a public entity crime subsequent to July 1, 1989. However, there has been a subsequent proceeding before a Hearing Officer of the State of Florida , Division of Administrative Hearings and the final Order entered by the Hearing Officer determined that it was not in the public interest to place the entity submitting this sworn statement on the convicted vendor list (attach a copy of the final order). I understand that the submission of this form to the contracting officer for the public entity identified in paragraph 1 above is for that public entity only and that this form is valid through December 31 of the calendar year in which it is filed. I also understand that I am required to inform the public entity prior to entering into a contract in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes for category two of any change in the information contained in this form. __________ Proposer Initials No Conflict of Interest or Contingent Fee Affidavit Proposer warrants that neither it nor any principal, employee, agent, representative nor family member has paid or will pay any fee or consideration that is contingent on the award or execution of a contract arising out of this solicitation. Proposer also warrants that neither it nor any principal, employee, agent, representative nor family member has procured or attempted to procure this contract in violation of any of the provisions of the Miami-Dade County conflict of interest or code of ethics ordinances. Further, Proposer acknowledges that any violation of these warrants will result in the termination of the contract and forfeiture of funds paid or to be paid to the Proposer should the Proposer be selected for the performance of this contract. __________ Proposer Initials Business Entity Affidavit Proposer hereby recognizes and certifies that no elected official, board member, or employee of the Village of Key Biscayne (the " Village”) shall have a financial interest directly or indirectly in this transaction or any compensation to be paid under or through this transaction, and further, that no Village employee, nor any elected or appointed officer (including Village board members) of the Village, nor any spouse, parent or child of such employee or elected or appointed officer of the Village, may be a partner, officer, director or proprietor of Proposer or Vendor, and further, that no such Village employee or elected or appointed officer, or the spouse, parent or child of any of them, alone or in combination, may have a material interest Form SEA in the Vendor or Proposer. Material interest means direct or indirect ownership of more than 5% of the total assets or capital stock of the Proposer. Any exception to these above described restrictions must be expressly provided by applicable law or ordinance and be confirmed in writing by Village. Further, Proposer recognizes that with respect to this transaction or bid, if any Proposer violates or is a party to a violation of the ethics ordinances or rules of the Village, the provisions of Miami-Dade County Code Section 2-11.1, as applicable to Village, or the provisions of Chapter 112, part III, Fla. Stat., the Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees, such Proposer may be disqualified from furnishing the goods or services for which the bid or proposal is submitted and may be further disqualified from submitting any future bids or proposals for goods or services to Village. __________ Proposer Initials Anti-Collusion Affidavit 1.Proposer/Bidder has personal knowledge of the matters set forth in its Proposal/Bid and is fully informed respecting the preparation and contents of the attached Proposal/Bid and a ll pertinent circumstances respecting the Proposal/Bid; 2.The Proposal/Bid is genuine and is not a collusive or sham Proposal/Bid; and 3.Neither the Proposer/Bidder nor any of its officers, partners, owners, agents, representatives, employees, or parties in interest, including Affiant, has in any way colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed, directly or indirectly with any other Proposer/Bidder, firm, or person to submit a collusive or sham Proposal/Bid, or has in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement or collusion or communication or conference with any other Proposer/Bidder, firm, or person to fix the price or prices in the attached Proposal/Bid or of any other Proposer/Bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the Proposal/Bid price or the Proposal/Bid price of any other Proposer/Bidder, or to secure through any collusion, conspiracy, connivance or unlawful agreement any advantage against the Village of Key Biscayne or any person interested in the proposed Contract. __________ Proposer Initials Scrutinized Company Certification 1.Proposer certifies that it and its subcontractors are not on the Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel List. Pursuant to Section 287.135, F.S., the Village may immediately terminate the Agreement that may result from this RFP at its sole option if the Proposer or its subcontractors are found to have submitted a false certification; or if the Proposer, or its subcontractors are placed on the Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel List or is engaged in the boycott of Israel during the term of the Agreement. 2.If the Agreement that may result from this RFP is for more than one million dollars, the Proposer certifies that it and its subcontractors are also not on the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in Sudan, Scrutinized Companies with Activities in the Iran Petroleum Energy Sector List, or engaged with business operations in Cuba or Syria as identified in Section 287.135, F.S. pursuant to Section 287.135, F.S., the Village may immediately terminate the Agreement that may result from this RFP at its sole option if the Proposer, its affiliates, or its subcontractors are found to have submitted a false Form SEA certification; or if the Proposer, its affiliates, or its subcontractors are placed on the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in Sudan List, or Scrutinized Companies with Activities in the Iran Petroleum Energy Sector List, or engaged with business operations in Cuba or Syria during the term of the Agreement. 3.The Proposer agrees to observe the above requirements for applicable subcontracts entered into for the performance of work under the Agreement that may result from this RFP. As provided in Subsection 287.135(8), F.S., if federal law ceases to authorize the above-stated contracting prohibitions then they shall become inoperative. __________ Proposer Initials Acknowledgment, Warranty, and Acceptance 1.Consultant warrants that it is willing and able to comply with all applicable state of Florida laws, rules and regulations. 2.Consultant warrants that it has read, understands, and is willing to comply with all requirements of Soliciation No. __________ and any addendum/addenda related thereto. 3.Consultant warrants that it will not delegate or subcontract its responsibilities under an agreement without the prior written permission of the Village Council or Village Manager, as applicable. 4.Consultant warrants that all information provided by it in connection with this Proposal is true and accurate. __________ Proposer Initials Truth in Negotiation Certification The Consultant hereby certifies, covenants, and warrants that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation for this project’s agreement are accurate, complete, and current at the time of contracting. The Consultant further agrees that the original agreement price and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which the Village determines the agreement price was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or noncurrent wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such agreement adjustments shall be made within (1) year following the end of the contract. For purposes of this certificate, the end of the agreement shall be deemed to be the date of the final billing or acceptance of the work by the Village, whichever is later. __________ Proposer Initials Sworn Signature of Proposing Entity Representative and Notarization for all above Affidavits follows on the next page. RFQ-2021-08 Miami-Dade Florida Jason Cummins, PE Romina Guido Accountant Catherine Olnick Proposal Narrative Page 1 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Proposal Narrative History The firm was founded by Jason Cummins, PE, and Jannek Cederberg, PE, in South Miami and over the course of eleven years has successfully grown to a team of over 30 coastal engineers, marine structural engineers, environmental scientists, construction managers, and regulatory and policy specialists. The two founders have extensive experience in the coastal and marine from both private and public clients. They have been involved in more than 500 coastal and marine engineering projects throughout Florida and the Caribbean (some of the largest in the region) providing unmatched knowledge and experience. Both founders have significant prior experience with the Village’s beaches and will remain involved in work related to this contract. Understanding of the Village’s Goals The Village has been managing their shoreline through sand placement since 1987. Recent beach nourishment projects have been constructed using approved upland sand sources, but the berm width has been limited by the shoreward migration of ecological resources (i.e., seagrass). The FDEP issued Joint Coastal Permit (JCP) No. 0160846-001 in June 2000 and it expires April 26, 2024; it should be a priority to secure a new JCP permit to ensure that the Village can continuously manage the shoreline and respond to storm events, while limiting the shoreward advancement of seagrass beds that can occur. Due to the geomorphology of the shoreline and the proximity of seagrass resources to the beach fill template, only minimal storm protection is provided by the current construction template. Consideration should be given to an expanded beach fill template, which could be designed to provide storm protection for different return interval storms along the Village’s shoreline as well as sea level rise. The level of protection offered by the beach relative to sea level rise will be a critical component of the overall resiliency of the Village. The design would also be optimized to avoid and minimize any required ecological mitigation because of a larger footprint. Incorporation of a coastal structure may be feasible to mitigate seagrass impacts, while also providing greater stability to the retained sand within the beach template and increase coastal resiliency. It is paramount that efforts to secure beach nourishment permits at the County, State, or Federal levels commence as soon as possible to ensure there is no lapse in the ability to maintain the shoreline. Our team’s unmatched environmental and regulatory expertise can represent the Village towards securing permits for the design necessary to protect the Village’s infrastructure and resources. Key Cummins Cederberg staff previously led the efforts on behalf of the Village to remedy specific permit conditions to secure a beach nourishment permit. As low elevation barrier island with valuable real estate, the Village is also vulnerable to sea level rise along its shoreline. Cummins Cederberg has the experience to help the Village adapt to climate change through implementation of the recently bonded large-scale resilience projects necessary to mitigate the Village’s flooding vulnerabilities. Our team members can prepare, and process grant applications to secure funds to compliment the Village’s funding for resiliency project implementation. Projects to be funded by the GO Bond are beach nourishment, construction of an offshore breakwater, and agency required seagrass mitigation. Expected Outcomes and Overview of Approach to Services Cummins Cederberg will provide the Village with services from project inception through project closeout including planning, permitting, design, and construction. As a coastal community, we understand that shoreline protection is a key component of the services required of this RFQ. In addition to the activities listed for coastal engineering services, Cummins Cederberg is prepared to work with the Village to design and permit a more robust beach fill template and offshore breakwater which mitigates associated seagrass impacts. We will work with the Village to assess and redesign the Village’s street ends along Biscayne Bay to provide protection from sea level rise and develop requirements for private property improvements. Contract Manager Jannek Cederberg, PE Project Manager Jason Cummins, PE Coastal Engineering Jannek Cederberg, PE Jason Cummins, PE Jordon Cheifet, PE, CFM Leonard Barrera, EI Colton Manning, EI Sahar Haddadian, PhD, EI Marine Science & Environmental Permitting Danielle H. Irwin, CFM, WEDG Gina Chiello Christie Hurley, WEDG Anne Laird Rebecah Delp Francesca Fourney Marine Engineering & Construction Management Jason Cummins, PE Jason Taylor, PE Rasheed Muslimani, PE, PMP Jon Cunningham, EI Ken Chang, EI Colton Manning, EI Team Organizational Chart Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services RFQ No. 2021-08 www.CumminsCederberg.com Page 1 Jannek Cederberg, PE Principal Engineer, Contract Manager EXPERIENCE Miami Beach Emergency Truck Haul, Miami Beach, Florida. Performed surveying, data collection, volumetric and equilibrium toe of fill analysis based on available historical beach profiles for four segments of beach. This information was utilized in designing the expansion of beach segments for maintenance nourishment. A total of 20,000 cubic yards of material placed along a heavily eroded segment of shoreline. Crandon Park Sea Level Rise Mitigation Roadmap, Key Biscayne, Florida. Served as Senior Project Manager to prepare a Sea Level Rise Flood Mitigation Study to analyze the impacts of sea level rise on the park’s infrastructure and operations, as well as develop flood mitigation concepts for capital improvement planning and budgeting. Crandon Park Marina, Key Biscayne, Florida. Field investigations including bathymetric surveying, tide and current measurements, marine resource survey, and sediment sampling. Tidal hydrodynamic modeling along with wave and sediment transport analyses conducted to determine source and magnitude of marina sedimentation problem. Alternatives assessment of potential coastal structures to inhibit sedimentation and need for periodic dredging. Coco Plum Beach Erosion Study and Beach Design, Marathon, Florida. Prepared an erosion study for the City of Marathon in Monroe County. Design and permitting of truck haul project for placement of sand above the mean high-water line. Coordinate with environmental agencies for approval of design and sand source. (City of Marathon, 2020) MSC Cruises Ocean Cay Marine Reserve, The Bahamas. Design of 10,000 feet of beach and 5,000 feet of shoreline stabilization for proposed out-island cruise destination. Detailed coastal engineering analysis, including numerical modeling of hurricane impacts. Engineering design of beach improvements and shoreline stabilization of reshaped island perimeter. Hollywood/Hallandale Beach Restoration, Hollywood, Florida. Coastal engineering and environmental permit processing for a 400,000 cubic yard truck haul beach fill project. Engineering design of beach fill template. Cross-shore sediment transport modeling. Geotechnical investigations. Coastal engineering analysis including extreme waves and storm surge. Regional Sediment Transport Study, Miami, Florida. Shoreline and sediment transport studies performed on the coast of Miami-Dade County between Bakers Haulover Inlet and Government Cut. Numerical modeling conducted utilizing Danish Hydraulics Institute (DHI) MIKE 21 and LITPACK software to simulate waves and nearshore coastal processes. Reference 1: Angel Trujillo, Miami-Dade County, 305-755-7800 Reference 2: Carlos Solis, City of Marathon, 305-289-5008 Reference 3: Eric Anderson, Palm Beach County, 561-233-2514 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 20 EDUCATION ▪ M.S. Coastal Engineering, Technical University of Denmark LICENSES ▪ Florida PE No. 69839 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ Permanent International Association of Navigation Congress ▪ Member of PIANC Working group ▪ Design and Operational Guidelines for “Superyacht Facilities” ▪ Danish Society of Hydraulic Engineering ▪ Port Everglades Association ▪ Florida Association of Environmental Professionals ▪ The Environmental Land Use Law Section of the Florida Bar Jason R. Cummins, PE Principal Engineer, Project Manager EXPERIENCE Miami Beach Emergency Truck Haul, Miami Beach, Florida. Performed surveying, data collection, volumetric and equilibrium toe of fill analysis based on available historical beach profiles and proposed fill volumes for four segments of beach. Designed fill template to maximize emergency truck haul nourishment based on observed eroded conditions. Survey stake-out of proposed fill template. Village of Key Biscayne Beach Nourishment, Key Biscayne, Florida. Coastal engineering and environmental permitting for 120,000 cubic yard beach fill and dune restoration project. Beach profile and hydrographic surveys conducted, along with sand source search, jet probes, vibracores, and sediment compatibility analysis. Coordination of dune vegetation planting and exotic removal plan. Crandon Park Sea Level Rise Mitigation Roadmap, Key Biscayne, Florida. Assisted with a Sea Level Rise Flood Mitigation Study to analyze the impacts of sea level rise on the park’s infrastructure and operations, as well as develop flood mitigation concepts for capital improvement planning and budgeting. Sunny Isles Coastal Analysis, Sunny Isles, Florida. Assessment of local sediment transport characteristics and the potential for shoreline stabilization along Sunny Isles Beach. An evaluation of nearshore coastal processes and sediment transport characteristics in the project vicinity was completed. Based on the assessment, a beach management plan was prepared for long-term beach planning. Hillsboro/Deerfield Beach Nourishment, Hillsboro Beach, Florida. Coastal engineering and environmental permit processing for 400k cubic yard beach fill project. Engineering design of beach fill template. Cross- shore sediment transport modeling. Geotechnical investigations and dredge plan for offshore borrow source. Construction drawings and technical specifications. Tides Condominium Risk Mapping, Hollywood, Florida. Erosion and scour assessment based on existing beach and seawall conditions. Numerical modeling of wave propagation, storm surge and potential wave run up impacts. Prepared and processed letter of map revision (LOMR) based on detailed survey information and coastal design conditions. Regional Sediment Transport Study, Miami, Florida. Shoreline and sediment transport studies performed on the coast of Miami-Dade County between Bakers Haulover Inlet and Government Cut. Numerical modeling conducted utilizing Danish Hydraulics Institute (DHI) MIKE 21 and LITPACK software to simulate waves and nearshore coastal processes. Reference 1: Ken Blair, Seahaven Marina, 561-625-9443 Reference 2: Ed Scalzitti, Colonial Club, 561-676-4952 Reference 3: James Brewer, Derecktor Shipyards, 954-920-5756 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 15 EDUCATION ▪ MSc Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering, University of Florida ▪ BSc Civil Engineering, University of Florida LICENSES ▪ Florida PE No. 71538 CERTIFICATIONS ▪ Certified Diver ▪ FHWA A-NHI 130091 Underwater Bridge Inspection – National Highway Institute and Association of Diving Contractors PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ Urban Land Institute (ULI) SE Florida/Caribbean, Member ▪ American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE ▪ American Institute of Architects ▪ South Florida Association of Environmental Professionals Jordon P. Cheifet, PE, CFM Senior Coastal Engineer EXPERIENCE City of Deerfield Beach Stormwater Master Plan, Deerfield Beach, Florida. Conducted a field investigation to evaluate existing coastal stormwater and flood defense structures in tidal waters relative to service life for the City. The project included a detailed analysis of historical water levels to establish design water levels based on king tides, storm events, and long-term sea level rise projections. Recommendations for maintenance and repairs were summarized in a Coastal Condition and Resiliency Report. NSU Ocean Campus Groin & Wharf Design, Dania Beach, Florida. Development of conceptual plans related to relocating the groin and fortifying the wharf and seawall to accommodate a USACE dredging project at the NSU Oceanographic Center. Project included evaluation of existing geotechnical data, navigational feasibility, cost estimating, and wave climate analysis. Coordination with U.S. Navy and U.S. Coast Guard to discuss concepts and feasibility. Mooring Buoy Design, Miami, Florida. Provided coastal engineering design for new mooring buoys at 6 artificial/natural reef sites in the Atlantic Ocean. The project included sediment probes to determine buoy foundation requirements, engineering design, and preparation of plans and specifications. Scheduled to begin construction Summer 2020. Coco Plum Beach Nourishment, City of Marathon, Florida. Provided coastal engineering services for a beach restoration project along approximately 1,500 feet of shoreline eroded from Hurricane Irma. Project included beach template design, development of technical specifications, and sediment characterization. Obtained FDEP CCCL permit while coordinating with City staff and local sand mines. Project is scheduled to begin construction Summer 2020. Hillsboro Imperial Condominium Seawall Condition Assessment, Hillsboro Beach, Florida. Performed a condition assessment of 250 feet of seawall fronting the Atlantic Ocean shoreline. An engineering report was developed to document the observed conditions and assist in developing repair and maintenance recommendations based on the severity of damage and results of the initial investigation. Kristi House Shoreline Stabilization, Miami, Florida. Provided structural/coastal engineering design for 525 feet of shoreline stabilization along an eroded portion of Wagner Creek. The project included a steel sheet pile bulkhead and armor stones with transition grading to the existing upland parking lot. Services performed included scour analyses, wave load analyses, and structure design. The project is currently in environmental permitting with construction expected to commence in 2021. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 15 EDUCATION ▪ M.Sc. Ocean and Resources Engineering, University of Hawaii ▪ B.Sc. Civil Engineering, Pennsylvania State University LICENSES ▪ Florida PE No. 72876 CERTIFICATIONS ▪ Professional Engineer – Florida No. 72876 ▪ Certified Floodplain Manager ▪ Certified Video Ray ROV Operator ▪ Surface Supplied Air Underwater Inspection Certification ▪ Advanced/Rescue/Nitrox SCUBA PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ Association of State Floodplain Managers, Member ▪ Florida Floodplain Managers Association, Member Leonard Barrera Allen, EI Coastal Engineer EXPERIENCE Crandon Shoreline Stabilization, Crandon Park, Key Biscayne, Florida. Stabilization of approximately 315 linear feet of shoreline in Crandon Park, Key Biscayne. Design of the shoreline stabilization using rock revetment composed of native lime rock. Created approximate area of 2800 sq ft for the planting of mangroves located directly behind the rock revetment. Crandon Park Sea Level Rise Flood Mitigation Study, Coral Gables, Florida. Assisted in preparing a Sea Level Rise Flood Mitigation Study to analyze the impacts of sea level rise on the park’s infrastructure and operations, as well as develop flood mitigation concepts for capital improvement planning and budgeting. Village of Bal Harbour Dune Nourishment, Bal Harbour, Florida. Prepared a nourishment plan for the placement of 600 cy of sand. Drone aerial photographs were collected during construction. This project is helping restore hurricane impacted dunes to their pre-storm condition, protecting the Village from wind and wave erosion while allowing beachfront access to residents and visitors. Aquazul Dune Repair, Lauderdale‐By‐The‐Sea, Florida. Repair of an eroded dune. An assessment was done to identify the required components, funds, vegetation, and repairs needed for the eroded dune. A new dune layout was constructed to establish the locations of the new vegetation and placement of sand. Coco Plum Beach Erosion Study and Beach Design, Marathon, Florida. Services under this project included the implementation, recommendations from the erosion study, assisting the City by coordinating with the regulatory agencies, and the preparation and submittals of the necessary permits. A detailed statistical analysis of offshore wave data was conducted along with a wave propagations study. Based on the results the underlying coastal processes of the erosion trends were documented and utilized in the beach and coastal structure design process. The area triggering the beach erosion was identified and solutions for stabilizing this area, while still providing sandy beach access, was developed. Brickell Key Island Coastal Resiliency Study, Brickell Key Island, Florida. Site inspection to identify vulnerable areas, including the perimeter of the entire Brickell Key Island. Analyses of sea level rise and extreme tide events were conducted to understand water level design conditions. The potential for increased storm impacts was assessed. Recommendations for long term planning was provided along with mitigation options. Construction documents and environmental permitting was conducted for the design. The design focused on adapting existing infrastructure to provide a cost-effective solution. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 6 EDUCATION ▪ M. Sc. Ocean Engineering, University of Miami ▪ B. Sc. Civil Engineering, University of Miami REGISTRATION ▪ Engineering Intern, E.I. – Reg. No. 1100019727 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) ▪ Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE) ▪ Urban Land Institute (ULI) SE Florida/Caribbean ▪ Port Everglades Association Sahar Haddadian, EI, PhD Coastal Engineer EXPERIENCE Peanut Island Flood Shoal Dredging Project, Riviera Beach, Florida. Assisted with the coastal analysis and dredge design for the Peanut Island dredging project. The analysis focuses on potential effects of dredging such as sand accretion, reduction of sediment, and how long until the project needs to be dredged again. Haulover Park Sea Level Rise Mitigation Plan, Miami, Florida. Prepared flood inundation and sea level rise analysis for the Haulover Park Sea Level Rise Mitigation Plan. This plan will lead to the development of mitigation solutions and cost estimates to address the effects of sea level rise that impact the public’s use of amenities. Crandon Park Sea Level Rise Mitigation Plan, Miami, Florida. Prepared flood inundation and sea level rise analysis for the Crandon Park Sea Level Rise Mitigation Plan. This plan will lead to the development of mitigation solutions and cost estimates to address the effects of sea level rise that impact the public’s use of amenities. Glass Window Bridge Coastal Engineering, Eleuthera, The Bahamas. The project includes reconstruction of an existing bridge and roadway, which provides the sole access between the northern and southern regions of the island. Sahar is responsible for the modeling of wave propagation and extreme tide events. Clifton Point LNG Facility, New Province, The Bahamas. The project includes conducting Coastal Engineering analysis to determine hydrodynamic conditions in the Project site. The goal is to determine the sediment transport processes during the construction of the pier and fate of potential oil spill during operational phase. Sahar is responsible for modeling of sediment transport and oil spill (…, 2020- Ongoing). FDOT Sea Level Rise, Miami, Florida. The project includes the sea level rise analysis and determination of the potential future flooding. Sahar is responsible for determining of the King tide in the project area and conducting sea level rise analysis to determine possible areas and road that would experience flooding (2020 - Ongoing) Sunset Harbor Wave Screen, City of Miami Beach, Florida. The project includes the construction of a new wave screen on the seaward side of the existing deck. Sahar was responsible for calculation of the wave load and attenuation to properly design the wave screen. Great Stirrup Cay Development, Berry Islands, The Bahamas. Coastal and marine improvements to cruise ship private island destination improvements to accommodate 5,000 passenger cruise ships. Flow3d analysis for wave load modeling. Engineering design of beach expansion using coastal structures, and reinforcement of existing iron-shore. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 1 EDUCATION ▪ Ph.D. Civil Engineering- Coastal Engineering, Louisiana State University ▪ M.Sc. Civil Engineering- Hydraulic Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran ▪ B.Sc. Civil Engineering- Structural Engineering, University of Tabriz, Iran CERTIFICATIONS ▪ Engineer-in-Training (EIT) PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ Society of Women Engineers ▪ American Society of Civil Engineers ▪ Coasts, Oceans, Ports, and Rivers Institute Colton Manning, EI Coastal Engineer EXPERIENCE Black Point Park and Marina and Homestead Bayfront Park Sea Level Rise Road Map and Action Plan, Homestead, Florida. Performed site infrastructure assessments for both Black Point Park and Marina and Homestead Bayfront Park to determine infrastructure at risk of inundation. Colton is currently analyzing the topography of both sites through Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and Digital Elevation Model (DEM) information compared to measured site-specific water levels and future sea level rise projections. Great Stirrup Cay Environmental Impact Assessment, The Berry Islands, The Bahamas. Worked with marine scientists to determine potential environmental impacts of constructing cruise ship piers on Great Stirrup Cay. Bathymetric and topographic data, construction material, geotechnical characteristics, native vegetation and animalia, and potential runoff were evaluated to determine potential effects on environmental resources. This information was compared to local coastal processes such as tides, waves, currents, sediment transportation, and sea level rise and atmospheric processes such as historic hurricanes to determine how the nearshore environment would be altered. Project alternatives were reviewed to finalize a design that minimized environmental imprints. Indian Creek Country Club Coastal Vulnerability and Resiliency Planning, Indian Creek, Florida. Analyzed the topography of the Indian Creek Country Club through Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and Digital Elevation Model (DEM information compared to calculated existing and future site-specific water surface levels. Determined infrastructure at the greatest risk of short-term and long-term inundation during high tides, extreme tides (“king” tides), and storm events. Future water levels were compared to existing infrastructure service life to develop flood mitigation concepts and implementation strategies to minimize construction costs while protecting upland amenities through 2100. Lyford Cay Beach Improvements, New Providence, The Bahamas. Analyzed common and extreme wind and wave conditions and assisted with the conceptual design of coastal rock groins to stabilize and enhance a private beachfront property experiencing significant erosion. Staniard Creek Bridge Modification Coastal Engineering Analysis, Andros, The Bahamas. Performed numerical modeling analyses for the relocation of the Staniard Creek Bridge, removal of existing mangroves below the Staniard Creek Bridge, and installation of culverts beneath the causeway connecting Staniard Creek to mainland Andros. The analyses demonstrated how these proposed works affected the hydrodynamic and sedimentation characteristics in the area. These characteristics determined whether modifications would have adverse erosional and hydrodynamic effects on the area and where alterations would occur. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 3 EDUCATION ▪ M.Sc. Coastal Engineering, University of Florida ▪ B.Sc. Civil Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology CERTIFICATIONS ▪ Florida Engineering Intern No. 1100021938 ▪ NAUI Open Water SCUBA No. 48756AF ▪ PADI Emergency Oxygen Provider No. 20100K0289 ▪ Emergency First Response No. 20100K0143 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ American Society of Civil Engineers ▪ Coasts, Oceans, Ports, and Rivers Institute ▪ American Institute of Steel Construction Danielle H. Irwin, CFM, PWS, WEDG Environmental Permitting & Regulatory Policy EXPERIENCE Bal Harbour Coastal Program Management, Village of Bal Harbour, Florida. Provided ongoing coastal management support for the Village including development of a Village-wide dune restoration plan, permitting and design of a beach nourishment project, providing drone aerial surveys of the Village shoreline, and representing the Village on the Bakers Haulover Inlet Technical Advisory Committee. Most recently, Danielle assisted with the Village’s dune restoration project in 2020, providing nourishment for the area from coastal erosion and during recent hurricanes. City of Miami DDA Resiliency Guidelines, City of Miami, Florida. Drafted shoreline resiliency guidelines for the City’s Downtown Development Authority including recommended seawall elevation standards and living shoreline best management practices. Hollywood Beach Nourishment, Hollywood, Florida. Provided consulting services related to the permitting and compliance assistance for the City’s beach nourishment project. Services include the development of their biological monitoring plan, permit modifications at the local, state, and federal level, and compliance assistance following the biological monitoring. St. Lucie Inlet, Martin County, Florida. Coordinated and oversaw the FDEP review and approval of the update to the sediment budget, sand bypassing volume, and Inlet Management Plan. Negotiated agreements with the County, City of Jupiter Island, and residents on inlet dredging and beach placement frequency and locations. Post Hurricane A1A Reconstruction, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. Coordination of FDEP staff review for re-construction of storm damaged North Ocean Blvd. (aka State Road A1A). The project included reconstruction of the road, dune enhancement and plantings, sidewalk, curb and gutter demolition and reconstruction, construction of a decorative and retaining wall with pedestrian cut outs, new stormwater runoff management system, hot spot nourishment, and reconstruction of street accesses, driveways, and entrances. Surf Club Re-Development, Surfside, Florida. Consulting services for the re-development of the 9-acre historic Surf Club property including oversight of the Coastal Construction Control Line Permitting, 100-Year Storm Impact Analysis, review of exterior lighting for the protection of marine turtles; and sand management with beach nourishment. Directly involved in resolving non-compliance issues resulting in a Consent Order detailing the sand removal and replacement activities required by FDEP. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 20 EDUCATION ▪ M.Sc. Oceanography, Florida State University ▪ B.A. Environmental Studies, University of Southern California ▪ B.Sc. Biology, University of Southern California CERTIFICATIONS ▪ Flood Plain Manager ▪ Professional Wetland Scientist ▪ LEED Accredited Professional BD&C ▪ Waterfront Edge Design Guidelines PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ Florida Association of Environmental Professionals, Tallahassee Area Chapter Board Member ▪ Florida Floodplain Managers Association ▪ Association of State Floodplain Managers ▪ Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association ▪ Society of Wetland Scientists Anne E. Laird Marine Science & Environmental Permitting EXPERIENCE Nearshore Hardbottom and Coral Surveys offshore Hillsboro Beach, Hillsboro Beach, Florida. Supporting scientist for monitoring of nearshore hard bottom and coral communities, including coral health assessment surveys, offshore Hillsboro Beach, Florida prior to, during, and following beach restoration and offshore dredging activities. Village of Key Biscayne Seagrass Mitigation and Monitoring Program, Key Biscayne, Florida. Project Manager and Chief Scientist for a large-scale, long-term (7 years) seagrass mitigation and monitoring program for the Village of Key Biscayne, Florida. The program was unique in that the seagrass included mixed species over a wide geographic range and multiple jurisdictional and watershed areas. The program including pre-mitigation mapping, mitigation planning, negotiation with state and local agencies, seagrass transplantation, and monitoring across fixed transects and stations over a period of 7 years. Ultimately 1.33 acres of seagrass including turtle grass (Thalassia testudinum), manatee grass (Syringodium filiforme) and shoal grass (Halodule wrightii) was completed to offset impacts from beach nourishment projects. Lake Worth Inlet Jetty Rehabilitation. Lake Worth, Florida. Provided environmental support for repairs of the north jetty at Lake Worth Inlet. Conducted a benthic survey within the entire project area and wrote a Coral Relocation Plan for review and approval by the USACE and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) for issuance of a Special Activity License (SAL). Relocated coral colonies from the jetty to a pre-approved artificial reef area within proximity to the jetty and performed a post-relocation monitoring survey. Port Everglades Jetty Rehabilitation. Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Performed a benthic survey and developed a Coral Relocation Plan for the relocation of coral colonies from the jetty to a natural hardbottom community off Broward County. Fisher Island Seawall and Mainland Ferry Terminal Surveys. Miami, Florida. Surveyed seawalls and support pilings for the presence of coral and octocoral colonies. Lake Worth Lagoon Seagrass Mapping, Palm Beach County, Florida. Performed the 2020 annual Lake Worth Lagoon (LWL) Fixed Transect Seagrass Monitoring Project along the ten fixed transects throughout the Lagoon in Palm Beach County. Higgs Beach Biological Monitoring, Key West, Florida. Project involves conducting marine biological resource monitoring for the proposed Sand Replenishment Project at Higgs Beach, City of Key West. Currently conducting the pre-construction biological baseline survey in accordance with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)- approved Biological Monitoring Plan and additional monitoring requirements by the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 24 EDUCATION ▪ M.Sc. Marine Environmental Science, Nova Southeastern University ▪ B.Sc. Biological Science, University of Tennessee CERTIFICATIONS ▪ PADI Open Water ▪ SCI Advanced Diver ▪ NOAA Science Diver ▪ IANTD Enriched Air Nitrox Diver ▪ AAUS Compliant Scientific Diver ▪ Certified USCG Safe Boating and Seamanship Skills ▪ American Heart Association Heartsaver Fist Aid CPR AED ▪ DAN Oxygen First Aid for Scuba Diving Injuries PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ America Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS) – Individual Member ▪ Florida Association of Environmental Professionals ▪ Women of WEDA (Western Dredging Association) Christie Hurley, WEDG Environmental Permitting & Marine Science EXPERIENCE Village of Key Biscayne Beach Renourishment Project Seagrass Mapping and Monitoring, Key Biscayne, Florida. Provided Project management, planning, and permitting services, as well as conducted biological surveys for the Village of Key Biscayne related to beach renourishment of 1.1 miles of beach. Conducted resource assessments of the proposed offshore borrow areas, nearshore seagrass edge mapping to facilitate project design, and permitting. Prepared a Project specific Biological Monitoring Plan for agency approval prior to commencement of construction. Conducted Braun Blanquet monitoring along twenty-seven 35-meter-long transects to establish a baseline for evaluation of any unanticipated project related impacts. Prepared Field Observation Reports documenting the findings of the borrow area surveys, nearshore seagrass edge surveys, and Braun Blanquet monitoring data with report submittal to the environmental regulatory agencies. Prepared annual FDEP Local Government Funding Requests each year and coordinated awarded grant funding with FDEP. Bal Harbor Benthic Mapping and EFH Assessment, Haulover Inlet, Florida. Conducted a benthic survey of natural resources of a proposed dredge area and surrounding borrow areas to map the extent, and characterize, benthic habitats present including seagrasses and other potential marine resources of concern (e.g. corals) using novel techniques due to high currents and extensive vessel traffic. Multiple species of seagrass, including the threatened Johnsons’ seagrass (Halophila johnsonii) were identified and mapped. Drafted an EFH Assessment as part of a NEPA-Compliant Environmental Assessment for the project. Village of Bal Harbour Dune Project, Bal Harbour, Florida. Project Manager responsible for developing a Dune Restoration Plan including the addition of 600 cy of additional sand and planting of native vegetation, as well as, securing a FDEP Field Permit for the Bakers Post-Storm Dune Restoration Project for the Village of Bal Harbour. Fisher Island Sand Tightening Project, Miami-Dade County, Florida. Recently completed a seagrass/hardbottom mapping and coral survey/report in support of the upcoming sand tightening project. The Main Beach and Club Beach terminal groins along the eastern portion of Fisher Island are permeable, allowing sand to escape the beach and is affecting beach performance and causing shoaling in the adjacent marina. Edgewater held pre-application meetings and is preparing permit applications and processing them through Miami-Dade County DERM, the FDEP, and the Corps to authorize construction activities. Additionally, we have had discussions with FWC regarding securing a Special Activity License for relocating corals and have negotiated no relocation mitigation to be necessary. Currently working on the Joint Coastal Permit application through the Corps and FDEP and a Class I application through Miami- Dade DERM. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 17 EDUCATION ▪ M.Sc. Biology, Florida Atlantic University ▪ B.A. Anthropology, Minor in Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona CERTIFICATIONS ▪ DAN (First Aid, CPR, AED, & Oxygen) ▪ Florida Master Naturalist ▪ NMFS/MMS Marine Mammal/Protected Species Observer ▪ NITROX ▪ US Power Squadron Piloting ▪ US Power Squadron Safe Boat Operation ▪ PADI Rescue Diver ▪ PADI Advanced Diver ▪ PADI Open Water Diver ▪ Waterfront Edge Design Guidelines PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ America Academy of Underwater Sciences ▪ South Florida Association of Environmental Professionals ▪ Treasure Coast Chapter Florida Association of Environmental Professionals ▪ South East Florida Coral Reef Initiative Francesca Fourney Marine Scientist EXPERIENCE Hillsboro/Deerfield Beach Nourishment Monitoring, Broward County, Florida. Completed biological monitoring associated with the 2015 Hillsboro/Deerfield Beach Nourishment Project. The westernmost edge of nearshore hardbottom habitat was mapped from 0.35 miles north of the Deerfield Beach International Fishing Pier (Pier) to 2.3 miles south of the Pier. Additional data collected included: sediment depth measurements, sediment coverage documentation, video documentation of marine resources, and percent cover of benthic macroinvertebrate and macroalgal communities along previously established shore perpendicular transects in and adjacent to the project area. Completed 2016 Year 1 Post-Construction Survey report and used parametric and non-parametric statistical analyses to examine the relationship between results from the current (2016) and baseline (2014) surveys. Higgs Beach Biological Monitoring, Key West, Florida. Conducted marine resource monitoring for beach nourishment project at Higgs Beach, City of Key West. Survey was conducted in accordance with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) approved Biological Monitoring Plan and additional monitoring requirements by the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Data collected included: sediment depth measurements, sediment coverage documentation, video documentation of marine resources, and percent cover of benthic macroinvertebrate and macroalgal communities along previously established shore perpendicular transects in and adjacent to the project area, and corals measuring greater than 10 cm where tagged. Terminal H (PortMiami) Benthic Survey, Coral Relocation, and Monitoring, Miami, Florida. This project involves coral relocation and monitoring associated with improvements to the PortMiami new cruise Terminal H. Conducted a post reattachment monitoring survey at the offshore relocation site (Gabion Reef), reattached dislodged corals, and prepared results of the project to the client and agencies. Environmental Permitting and Seagrass Survey, Singer Island Bridge Replacement, Riviera Beach, Florida. This project involves replacing six low level residential bridges on Singer Island in Palm Beach Isles. Due to the presence of the federally threatened Johnson’s seagrass (Halophila johnsonii) within the project footprint and potential presence of other listed species, this project requires appropriate permitting. Responsible for preparation of the necessary permits including US Coast Guard Bridge Project Questionnaire, USACE Manatee Biological Evaluation, SFWMD General ERP, and USACE Nationwide Permit application, and RAI responses including preparation of USACE 12-step mitigation plan. Also attended inter-agency pre-application meetings. Conducted updated seagrass surveys. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 5 EDUCATION ▪ M.Sc. Marine Biology, Nova Southeastern University ▪ B.Sc. Marine Biology, Nova Southeastern University CERTIFICATIONS ▪ AAUS Scientific Diver ▪ PADI Divemaster ▪ FL Stormwater Erosion and Sedimentation Control Inspector ▪ EFR, CPR, O2 First Aid ▪ Nitrox Diver & Gas Blender ▪ Visual Scuba Inspector ▪ Florida Master Naturalist ▪ FWC Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ American Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS) ▪ South Florida Association of Environmental Professionals Gina Chiello Environmental Permitting & Marine Science EXPERIENCE Village of Key Biscayne Beach Re-nourishment, Village of Key Biscayne, Florida. Conducted marine resource assessments of the nearshore seagrass habitat using the Braun-Blanquet method to monitor twenty-seven 35-meter-long transects and conducted nearshore seagrass edge mapping, to evaluate any unanticipated project related impacts. Monitoring Reports were prepared, per the project specific permit requirements, documenting the findings of the nearshore seagrass edge surveys and Braun-Blanquet monitoring data. Higgs Beach Sand Replenishment – Reconnaissance Survey, Key West, Florida. Conducted a reconnaissance survey of the project area and immediate vicinity to map out and characterize nearshore benthic habitats, including seagrass and hardbottom communities, using belt-transect and point quadrat methodology, including Braun-Blanquet and BERMR. A report and basemap were prepared to process environmental permits through FDEP and USACE. Coordinated with both the FDEP and FKNMS on the design of the survey and subsequent biological monitoring plan. Bal Harbor Village Benthic Mapping and EFH Assessment, Haulover Inlet, Florida. The USACE is proposing to dredge the Baker’s Haulover Inlet ebb shoal and place the material on adjacent Town of Bal Harbor shoreline. Marine biologist for large-scale habitat mapping and characterization study of seagrass, macroalgae and hardbottom communities to support permitting and NEPA efforts, as well as future monitoring design. Also provided ESA Section 7 consultation support and Essential Fish Habitat Assessment. Hollywood Beach Re-nourishment, Hollywood, Florida. Conducted pre- construction transect installation and biological monitoring including hardbottom mapping, Acropora cervicornis health tracking, and assessment of the nearshore reef using BEAMR, and conducted post construction hardbottom and epifaunal edge surveys. Monitoring reports were prepared per the project specific permit conditions. Hillsboro Beach Re-nourishment, Town of Hillsboro Beach, Florida. Conducted marine and coastal surveys including marine resource investigations, pipeline corridor surveys, hardbottom mapping, Acropora sp. Surveys, in-water sea turtle surveys, weekly escarpment surveys, and year-long shorebird monitoring. Higgs Beach Sand Replenishment – Benthic Survey, Key West, Florida. A marine resource survey was performed along approximately 570 linear feet of shoreline. The purpose of this survey was to document the general extent, species, and density of seagrasses and other potential marine resources of concern (e.g., corals), that may be growing on the submerged substrate within the proposed fill template. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 12 EDUCATION ▪ Graduate Certificate Geographic Information Systems, Florida Atlantic University ▪ B.Sc. Marine Biology, University of West Florida CERTIFICATIONS ▪ NAUI Rescue Diver; PADI Enriched Air Nitrox Diver (IAND/EANx) ▪ American Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS) Scientific Diver Certified, Florida Atlantic University 2013, AAUS Compliant ▪ Florida Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater, Erosion and Sedimentation Control Inspector PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ America Academy of Underwater Sciences ▪ Florida Association of Environmental Professionals, Treasure Coast Chapter, Treasurer ▪ Urban Land Institute ▪ The Environmental and Land Use Law Section of the Florida Bar ▪ Leadership Palm Beach County Rebecah Delp Environmental Permitting & Marine Science EXPERIENCE Higgs Beach Sand Replenishment – Reconnaissance Survey, Key West, Florida. Conducted a reconnaissance survey of the project area and immediate vicinity to map out and characterize nearshore benthic habitats, including seagrass and hardbottom communities, using belt-transect and point quadrat methodology, including Braun-Blanquet and BEAMR. A report and basemap were prepared to process environmental permits through FDEP and USACE. Coordinated with both the FDEP and FKNMS on the design of the survey and subsequent biological monitoring plan. Ongoing pre- and post-construction monitoring will continue for two years. Higgs Beach Sand Replenishment, Pre-construction Baseline Survey – Key West, Florida. Established and tagged permanent transect endpoints to be utilized to establish permanent transect lines that will be used for biological monitoring surveys of pre- and post-construction sand replenishment. Transects were installed in hardbottom and SAV using an underwater drill, stakes, mallets, and underwater epoxy. Pre-construction surveying included habitat edge mapping, transect monitoring, SAV patch delineation and rapid assessment, and coral colony tagging and condition monitoring as outlined in the Biological Monitoring Plan written by FDEP. Bal Harbor Village Benthic Mapping and EFH Assessment, Haulover Inlet, Florida. The USACE is proposing to dredge the Baker’s Haulover Inlet ebb shoal and place the material on adjacent Town of Bal Harbor shoreline. Ms. Delp assisted in conducting a large-scale benthic survey of natural resources of a proposed dredge area and surrounding borrow areas to map the extent, and characterize, benthic habitats present including seagrasses and other potential marine resources of concern (e.g. corals) using novel techniques due to high currents and extensive vessel traffic. Multiple species of seagrass, including the threatened Johnsons’ seagrass (Halophila johnsonii) were identified and mapped. Efforts supported permitting and NEPA efforts, as well as future monitoring design. Peanut Island Flood Shoal, Palm Beach, Florida. The project includes dredging of the flood shoal north of an island located within Lake Worth for the purposed of navigational safety. Ms. Delp assisted in gathering preliminary research including pulling historical aerials and permitting history, reviewing existing biological resource reports, and gathering environmental data within the surrounding Project area to assist with permit application packages. Terminal H (PortMiami) Benthic Survey and Coral Relocation and Monitoring – Miami, Florida. Performed a pre-construction coral and octocoral survey in compliance with the FDEP and the NMFS. Provided results to the FDEP and PortMiami for review. Assisted in conducting a post-reattachment monitoring survey on the relocated corals. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 2 EDUCATION ▪ M.P.S. Tropical Marine Ecosystem Management, Rosenstiel School for Marina and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami ▪ B.S. Biology, Minor Marine Science, Wittenberg University CERTIFICATIONS ▪ PADI Rescue Diver ▪ Nitrox Diver ▪ American Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS) Scientific Diver Certified ▪ Motorboat Operator Certification (MOCC) PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ America Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS) ▪ Florida Association of Environmental Professionals (FAEP) Similar Projects Page 1 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 47th Street Beach Restoration Miami, FL Cummins Cederberg was engaged by Miami-Dade County to design a 20,000-cubic yard beach fill project in a highly eroded area of Miami Beach. The project area experienced significant shoreline retreat following a series of winter storms causing extensive erosion of the established dune system and preventing access for emergency vehicles. In addition, the beach area fronts several upscale condominiums and hotels, which requested prompt resolution by the County. Cummins Cederberg worked around the clock to develop concept drawings to initiate the permitting process. The design included consideration of the existing dune and berm, as well as the general federal beach design requirements and construction methods as the project site is located within the federal project footprint. Permit applications with drawings were submitted to the regulatory agencies two days after Cummins Cederberg was initially contacted by the County. An Equilibrium Toe of Fill (ETOF) study was subsequently prepared to assess potential impacts to nearshore hardbottom as the sand is exposed to waves and varying tidal conditions. The study analyzed potential cross-shore sand movement to facilitate adjustments to the construction template. Relevance: ✓ 20,000 cy beach fill ✓ Permit applications ✓ Equilibrium Toe of Fill study ✓ Sediment transport study ✓ Numerical modeling Project Client: Miami-Dade County Public Works Similar Projects Page 2 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Bal Harbour Village Beach Nourishment Bal Harbour Village, FL Cummins Cederberg designed and permitted an emergency beach nourishment project to partially restore the beach for Bal Harbour Village until a larger project by the USACE could be implemented. The beach and dunes had experienced significant erosion following Hurricane Irma and had been awarded a grant from FEMA for beach restoration. Cummins Cederberg assisted the Village in administering the FEMA grant. Our assistance included compiling and filing the quarterly reports, submitting documentation of completed work, coordination with the grant manager at FDEM, and facilitating a post- construction grant audit by FEMA. Cummins Cederberg also assisted the Village in requesting a time extension under the assumption that the sand placement work would be completed by December 2020 due to turtle season construction restrictions. Construction drawings were prepared for the sand placement and construction methodology was coordinated with the contractor. Cummins Cederberg provided construction administration services for the Village to manage construction. Drone aerial photographs were collected during construction to document progress efficiently. * The sand for the larger nourishment project is being dredged from Baker’s Haulvoer Inlet. The project experience described within the Baker’s Haulvoer Inlet project description on the next few pages illustrates the environmental resource work performed for the dredged material. Cummins Cederberg is managing projects for two neighboring clients and finding cost effective ways for both to benefit by providing a marine resource survey for the dredged material to be used on the later project for the Villages’ beach nourishment. Relevance: ✓ FEMA grant coordination and application ✓ Beach design ✓ Construction administration ✓ Drone pre- and post-surveys Project Client: Village of Bal Harbour Similar Projects Page 3 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Baker’s Haulover Inlet Benthic Survey Miami, FL The US Army Corps is proposing to dredge the Baker’s Haulover Inlet flood shoal, along with sections of the ICWW, with placement of approximately 250,000 cubic yards of dredged material along the Bal Harbor shoreline from FDEP R-monument R-27 to R-31+500. The flood shoal is estimated to contain approximately 150,000 cubic yards of in-place fill sand, whereas the ICWW contains an estimated 5,000 cubic yards of beach quality sand and Baker’s Inlet contains approximately 10,000 cubic yards. Additional material may be needed via truck haul to complete the required beach template. Cummins Cederberg, Inc. was retained to conduct a benthic survey of natural resources surrounding the borrow areas to map the extent, and characterize, benthic habitats present including seagrasses and other potential marine resources of concern (e.g., corals). A total of 159 ground-truthing points were surveyed to gather data on the relative density of resources, species composition and overall condition of each benthic community type. A geo-referenced map of resources in the project area was produced in GIS. In addition to the benthic resource survey and mapping, Cummins Cederberg biologists also conducted a review of existing Programmatic Biological Opinions available and analysis of coverage for listed species likely to occur in the project area in support of Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7 consultation. An Essential Fish Habitat Assessment was also prepared under the Magnuson- Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. This information will be used for permitting purposes as well as in support of NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) documentation. All scientific diving was conducted in compliance with 29 CFR 1910.410 and the American Academy of Underwater Scientists (AAUS) criteria. Biologists conducting the survey were experienced in identifying Caribbean hard corals, octocorals, sponges, submerged aquatic vegetation, and identifying listed and/or invasive species. Relevance: ✓ Benthic survey ✓ NEPA support ✓ Habitat mapping and GIS ✓ ESA Section 7 Support ✓ EFH Project Client: US Army Corps of Engineers/ LG2 Environmental Solutions Similar Projects Page 4 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Lake Worth Inlet Flood Shoal Dredging Miami, FL Cummins Cederberg is providing coastal engineering and environmental consulting services for the Lake Worth Inlet Flood Shoal Dredging Project, located adjacent to the Port of Palm Beach, Peanut Island Park, and the Lake Worth Inlet. Cummins Cederberg designed the project, which consists of dredging a portion of the eastern perimeter and a center cut through the shoal to increase navigation and safety. The center cut will restore sediment deposition capacity in areas where sediment has historically deposited. As an additional benefit, it will increase access to the interior of the shoal and help reduce vessel density along the eastern and northern perimeters improving navigation and safety in the marked channels. Responsibilities included bathymetric survey, current measurements, marine resource survey support, preparation of engineering plans, environmental permit application preparation and processing with the FDEP and the USACE, coordination and participation in public stakeholder meetings, and coastal engineering analysis. The bathymetric survey and current data were used for coastal modeling and subsequent design. To better understand the highly complex dynamics of the flood shoal and evaluate effects post- dredging, a coastal analysis was performed. The components that were evaluated were general coastal processes (waves and tidal hydrodynamic), sediment characteristics, sediment transport patterns, infilling time and anticipated dredge frequency, and impact to the Intracoastal Waterway west of the Lake Worth Inlet flood shoal based on cross-sectional profile and potential slope adjustments as well as anticipated sand movement and deposition. The bathymetric survey will also serve as a basis for the dredge design, which will be developed for reshaping of the flood shoal. Relevance: ✓ Bathymetric survey ✓ Current measurements ✓ Marine resource survey ✓ Engineering plans ✓ Environmental permit application, preparation, and processing ✓ Dredge design Project Client: Marine Industries Association of Palm Beach County Similar Projects Page 5 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Coco Plum Beach Nourishment Marathon, FL Coco Plum Beach is located along the southeast coast of Marathon in the Florida Keys. The beach is one of few beaches in the Florida Keys and is popular among residents and tourists. The beach has historically experienced significant erosion requiring costly beach fill projects, along with the nuisance of construction, and periods with limited beach use area. The beach is exposed to the Atlantic Ocean but is fronted by extensive shallow seagrass habitat, reducing direct exposure to ocean waves. As part of Phase I of the project, Cummins Cederberg conducted an erosion study, prepared a beach design involving coastal structures to provide long term stability, and conduct a benthic survey to quantity potential impacts to the nearshore seagrass habitat. A detailed statistical analysis of offshore wave data and propagation was conducted to evaluate sediment transport patterns and erosion. Utilizing the advanced MIKE21 wave model, the wave transformation from offshore to nearshore was analyzed. The detailed wave modelling allowed for detailed review and comparison of the wave climate along the beach as well as assessing sediment transport. Based on the results of the wave modeling and sediment transport assessment, the underlying coastal processes of the erosion trends were documented and utilized in the beach and coastal structure design process. The area triggering the beach erosion was identified and solutions for stabilizing this area, while still providing sandy beach access were developed. Due to the impact of Hurricane Irma in the Florida Keys, the City needed to act quickly to restore Coco Plum Beach. As an interim solution until funding could be secured for the full project, Cummins Cederberg was retained to design a beach nourishment project to restore approximately 1,500 LF of eroded beach. The low, narrow beach and dense nearshore seagrass beds required an optimized design above Mean High Water to provide storm protection, recreational area, and sea turtle nesting area. Cummins Cederberg provided environmental permitting, engineering design, construction documents, cost estimates, bidding assistance, and construction administration services to the City. The project placed approximately 728 cubic yard of beach compatible sand on the beach and was completed in December 2020 on budget and ahead of schedule. Relevance: ✓ Erosion study ✓ Beach design ✓ Coastal structure design ✓ MIKE21 wave modeling ✓ Sediment transport ✓ Benthic survey ✓ Environmental permitting ✓ Construction administration Project Client: City of Marathon/T.Y. Lin International Similar Projects Page 6 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Hillsboro Club Dune Nourishment Hillsboro Beach, FL Cummins Cederberg served as the project manager, senior engineer, and marine biologist for the Hillsboro Club Dune Repair, providing emergency dune restoration and repair services, as well as sand studies at the Hillsboro Club. Responsibilities included pre-construction sediment testing, preparation, and submittal of FDEP CCCL permit application packages, development of construction documents, and coordination with the Town of Hillsboro Beach for code compliance. The dune design was based on maximizing the volume of sand seaward of the project property. As required by the FDEP, existing dune vegetation mapping was performed, a proposed vegetation planting plan developed, and planting design parameters were prepared. The planting plans included the identifying the location of existing native dune vegetation to be preserved, buried, or replanted, proposed dune vegetation plantings for stabilization and mitigation, and areas of invasive exotic plants for removal. Sand samples from the existing dune system were obtained and tested to identify available sand sources for the renourishment project. Cummins Cederberg was able to perform the sand testing prior to the beginning of a nearby dredging project, which was occurring concurrently. Through this expedited, out-of-the-box process, we were able to evaluate if this alternative sand source could be used for the dune repair, making the project more economically feasible for the client. Cummins Cederberg also provided general construction administration services ranging from participation in pre-construction meetings, coordination with FDEP compliance, and periodic site visits. Relevance: ✓ Dune repair ✓ Sand samples ✓ Erosion assessment ✓ Construction administration Project Client: Hillsboro Club Condominium Association Similar Projects Page 7 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Higgs Beach Nourishment Key West, FL Higgs Beach is one of few beaches in Key West and is an important component for both storm protection and an amenity for residents and visitors. However, the beach periodically experiences erosion resulting in a need for a smaller beach nourishment project to offset sand loss. Cummins Cederberg was retained in 2018 to conduct a preliminary benthic survey to document the general extent, species, and density of seagrasses and other potential marine resources of concern (e.g., corals), that may be growing on the submerged substrate within the proposed fill template, as well as, conduct an equilibrated toe-of-fill (ETOF) analysis, to estimate the seaward location of the sand placement and profile adjustment, referred to as the ETOF, based on the profile translation method. Beach fill typically has a high rate of cross-shore sediment transport immediately after placement. As such, environmental agencies are concerned with potential impacts to nearshore marine resources. Utilizing the proposed construction template, Cummins Cederberg coastal engineers determined the ETOF. Based on the proposed fill conditions, a representative equilibrium profile was established for three profiles, based on an equilibrium of the proposed beach fill template and seaward translation of the native beach profile. This information was summarized into a report, along with recommendations for design adjustments. In 2019, Cummins Cederberg performed a more extensive reconnaissance survey of the project area and immediate benthic habitats. Cummins Cederberg coordinated with both the FDEP and FKNMS on the design of the survey and subsequent biological monitoring plan. Both surveys were conducted via SCUBA/snorkel using BEAMR, line-intercept and Braun-Blanquet methodologies to collect and quantify data. A report and resource map were prepared permit applications to the FDEP and USACE. Cummins Cederberg will continue to conduct monitoring of benthic resources post-construction. Relevance: ✓ ETOF analysis ✓ Benthic survey ✓ Permit applications Project Client: City of Marathon/T.Y. Lin International Similar Projects Page 8 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Great Stirrup Cay Beach Design Great Stirrup Cay, The Bahamas Cummins Cederberg designed 2,000 feet of world class beach for Norwegian Cruise Line (NCL) as part of the revitalization of their exclusive private cruise destination island, Great Stirrup Cay. Cummins Cederberg prepared design drawings for the beach improvements, including coastal structures, beach nourishment and modification to existing natural and artificial lagoon features. The beach design including detailed studies and modeling to determine long term shoreline position as governed by the complex island configuration and the need for coastal structures to stabilize the beach. A complex boussinesq wave model was utilized to simulate the propagation of offshore wave conditions to secluded areas of the island, considering the effects of wave diffraction and reflection on proposed shoreline stabilization conditions. This also included determining Equilibrium Toe of Fill (ETOF) to accurately determine volume requirements and not impact environmental resources. As part of the beach design and overall planning efforts, Cummins Cederberg prepared a coastal engineering analysis to support the design of proposed improvements. Based on the coastal engineering analysis, Cummins Cederberg evaluated the feasibility of an offshore pier structure, including preliminary design of structural elements and construction cost estimating. Logistical constraints were evaluated relative to the exposed location and potential impacts to construction activities and overall schedule. Relevance: ✓ Beach design ✓ Coastal modeling, Surge analysis ✓ Wind analysis ✓ Wave propagation ✓ Operational downtime ✓ Design criteria for marine structures Project Client: Norwegian Cruise Line/Bermello Ajamil Similar Projects Page 9 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Ocean Cay Private Island Beach Design Bimini Islands, The Bahamas Cummins Cederberg was retained to lead all surveying, coastal engineering, beach, and coastal structure design, as well as the Environmental Impact Analysis (EIA) and Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for this $150M+ project. Cummins Cederberg designed 2 miles of beach and one mile of shoreline stabilization including rock revetment, groins and breakwaters consisting of 100,000 tons of rock. Due to the Client requirement of “as much beach possible” and varying conditions on the sides of island, complex analyses and MIKE21 modeling were performed as part of the design. The design was further complicated by existing dredge holes up to 60 feet close to the island, which required extensive Equilibrium Toe of Fill (ETOF) analyses in order to prevent sand from entering. Expansion of the island through reclamation and excavation was designed involving earthwork of approximately 1 million cubic yards. Cummins Cederberg also provided construction administration services throughout construction. A marine resource survey was conducted to map marine resources, such as seagrass and corals, which could potentially be impacted by the construction. An EIA was prepared and approved by the Bahamas Environment, Science & Technology (BEST) Commission. Detailed hurricane and wave modeling were conducted utilizing the advanced MIKE21 numerical model to determine extreme wave and storm surge conditions. A flood map with minimum finished floor elevations was prepared for use by the design team. Directly following the analysis, the island was impacted by Hurricane Matthew which was one of many hurricane events simulated during the design process. The modelled storm surge elevations were consistent with the observed impacts. Relevance: ✓ Coastal engineering study ✓ Beach design ✓ Site analysis ✓ Shoreline configuration ✓ Sediment transport study ✓ Wave surge study ✓ Bathymetric survey ✓ Marine engineering Project Client: MSC Cruises/Bermello Ajamil Similar Projects Page 10 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Pearns Point Beach Creation Antigua Cummins Cederberg was retained to create a beach for a luxury development on the east coast of Antigua. The development included luxury villas and hotel in a private peninsula overlooking the Caribbean Sea. The main portion of the property naturally exhibited limited beach area, which was an important amenity for the coastal development. Cummins Cederberg conducted an initial site analysis to observe shoreline configuration, topographic features, sediment conditions, and coastal processes. Site opportunities and constraints were subsequently discussed with the client to develop a design in line with their vision and budget. The coastal engineering study was conducted to understand local and regional coastal processes. Offshore wave data from Cummins Cederberg’s in-house global wave data base was analyzed statistically in order to understand normal and extreme wave conditions along with potential seasonal variations. Sediment transport patterns are generally dictated by normal average wave conditions, while extreme conditions govern the design of coastal structures such as groins and breakwaters. Detailed wave and sediment transport modeling were subsequently conducted utilizing the advanced MIKE21 software. Nearshore wave conditions and sediment transport patterns were determined for the subsequent beach and rock groin design. The beach was designed following natural sediment transport patterns, thereby providing for a cost-effective design, and eliminating future maintenance needs. Relevance: ✓ Wave Modeling ✓ MIKE21 Software ✓ Nearshore wave conditions ✓ Beach design ✓ Sediment transport ✓ Groin design Project Client: Orange, LTD. Question Set 1: Qualifications Question Set 1 Instructions #Question Response Comment ? 1.1.1 What is the name of the individual submitting this Proposal on behalf of your firm?Jannek Cederberg, PE TRUE 1.1.2 What is this person's title?President TRUE 1.1.3 Please provide a contact telephone number:305-741-6155 TRUE 1.1.4 Please provide a contact email address:jcederberg@cumminscederber g.com TRUE ? 1.2.1 How many years has your company been in business under its current name and ownership?11 TRUE 1.2.2 How many years has your company provided services consistent with those requested in this RFQ?11 TRUE 1.2.3 What is your company's primary business?Coastal & Marine Engineering TRUE 1.2.4 Type of Company:Corporation The comment must be left blank for this response 1.2.5 Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN):27-2129033 TRUE 1.2.6 Date registered to conduct business in Florida:3/17/2010 TRUE 1.2.7 Primary Office Location:7550 Red Road, Ste 217 South Miami, Florida 33143 TRUE 1.2.8 Local Office Location (If same as primary, please indicate so):7550 Red Road, Ste 217 South Miami, Florida 33143 TRUE 1.2.9 Will all goods/services be provided out of the local office location? If not, then indicate what other office services will be provided from.Yes The comment must be left blank for this response 1.2.10 Total Number of Employees:31 TRUE ? 1.3.1 Identify all owners or partners of the company (Provide Name, Title, and Percent Ownership):Long Answer Required Jannek Cederberg, PE, Principal / President - 50% ownership Jason Cummins, PE, Principal / Secretary - 50% ownership TRUE 1.3.2 Is any identified owner an owner of another company? (If yes, identify the name of the owner and the other company name, and the ownership interest)No The comment must be left blank for this response ? 1.4.1 Identify all individuals authorized to sign on behalf of the company, indicating their level of signing authority: (Include name, title, and signing authority Ex. All, Cost up to $ Amount, No-Cost, Other) Long Answer Required Jannek Cederberg, PE, Principal / President (all cost) Jason Cummins, PE, Principal / Secretary (all cost) TRUE ? 1.5.1 Identify the five (5) most recent contracts in which your company has provided services to other public entities. Include the entity's name and a contact person. Long Answer Required 1. City of Maration - Carlos Solis 2. Miami-Dade County - Angel Trujillo 3. Village of Bal Harbour - John Oldenberg 4. Palm Beach County - Eric Andersen 5. Miami-Dade County - Joe Garcia TRUE ? 1.6.1 Insurance Carrier Name:Lassiter Ware TRUE 1.6.2 Insurance Carrier Address:1300 North Westshore Blvd., Ste 110, Tampa FL 33607 TRUE 1.6.3 Provide the number of insurance claims paid out in the last five years:0 TRUE 1.6.4 Provide the total value of insurance claims paid out in the last five years:0 TRUE 1.6.5 Provide insurance representative contact name, telephone, and email address: Patricia L. Schmamaltz 813-391-3710 patricias@lassiterware.com TRUE 1.6.6 Please provide employer modification rating ("EMR"). If no EMR, please explain:.93 TRUE Contract Information Insurance 24 Questions 100.00% Complete Please use the Response column for short answers to the question asked and the Comment column to provide additional clarification if necessary. Some questions have been set to not allow a comment. Those questions will be marked red beside the comment indicating a comment is not allowed. For questions that require long answers, please choose the "See Comment" option and include the longer answer in the Comment field. Contact Information Company Profile Ownership Signing Authority Question Set 2: Client References Question Set 2 Instructions #Question Response Comment ? 2.1.1 Name of Client Organization:City of Marathon TRUE 2.1.2 Contact Person Name:Carlos Solis TRUE 2.1.3 Contact Person Title:Director TRUE 2.1.4 Contact Department:Public Works and Engineering TRUE 2.1.5 Contact Telephone:305-289-5008 TRUE 2.1.6 Contact Email:solisc@ci.marathon.fl.us TRUE 2.1.7 Contract Start Date:2019 TRUE 2.1.8 Contract End Date:2021 TRUE 2.1.9 Contract Value:$77,500 TRUE 2.1.10 Is the Contract still active?No TRUE 2.1.11 Scope of Work (Provide as much detail as possible):Long Answer Required Beach design, coastal structure design, MIKE21 wave modeling, sediment transport, benthic survey, environmental permitting, construction administration TRUE ? 2.2.1 Name of Client Organization:Village of Bal Harbour TRUE 2.2.2 Contact Person Name:John Oldenburg TRUE 2.2.3 Contact Person Title:Director TRUE 2.2.4 Contact Department:Parks and Public Spaces TRUE 2.2.5 Contact Telephone:305-993-7436 TRUE 2.2.6 Contact Email:joldenburg@balharbourfl.gov TRUE 2.2.7 Contract Start Date:2019 TRUE 2.2.8 Contract End Date:2020 TRUE 2.2.9 Contract Value:$91,000 TRUE 2.2.10 Is the Contract still active?Yes The task is not active, but this is part of a multi year continuing service contract TRUE 2.2.11 Scope of Work (Provide as much detail as possible):Long Answer Required FEMA grant coordination, beach design, construction administration for nourishment, drone pre- and post- surveys TRUE ? 2.3.1 Name of Client Organization:USACE/LG2 Environmental Solutions TRUE 2.3.2 Contact Person Name:Mark Howell TRUE 2.3.3 Contact Person Title:Senior Project Manager TRUE 2.3.4 Contact Department:Environmental Resources TRUE 2.3.5 Contact Telephone:904-363-1686 TRUE 2.3.6 Contact Email:mhowell@lg2es.com TRUE 2.3.7 Contract Start Date:2019 TRUE 2.3.8 Contract End Date:2020 TRUE 2.3.9 Contract Value:$90,000 TRUE 2.3.10 Is the Contract still active?No TRUE 2.3.11 Scope of Work (Provide as much detail as possible):Long Answer Required Benthic survey for dredging to be used for beach nourishment, NEPA support, habitat mapping and GIS, ESA Section 7, Essential Fish Habitat TRUE "Respondent shall provide the information requested for the its verifiable client references as required in the solicitation documents. Respondent may not use the same reference for more than one (1) project/contract and confidential references shall not be included. References that are listed as subcontractors in the response will not be accepted as references under this solicitation. Entities having an affiliation with the Respondent (i.e. currently parent, subsidiary having common ownership, having common directors, officers or agents or sharing profits or liabilities) will not be accepted as references under this solicitation. References should be available for contact during normal business hours, 9:00 AM – 5:00 PM, Eastern Time. The Village will attempt to contact each reference by telephone no less than three times. In the event the contact person indicated cannot be reached following three attempts or is unwilling to provide the requested information, the reference will be considered “unverified” for purposes of this RFP. It is the Proposer’s responsibility to provide complete and accurate information for each reference, the Village will not correct incorrectly supplied information. No claim of lack of information or error will relieve Respondent of this responsibility. The Village reserves the right to contact references other than those identified by the Respondent to obtain additional information regarding past performance. Any information obtained as a result of such contact may be used to determine whether or not the Respondent is a “responsible vendor”, as defined in section 287.012(25), Florida Statutes, as may be amended from time to time." Client Reference 1 Client Reference 2 Client Reference 3 33 Questions 100.00% Complete Question Set 3: Dispute Disclosure Question Set 3 Instructions #Question Response Comment 3.0.1 Has your firm or any of its officers, received a reprimand of any nature or been suspended by the Department of Professional Regulations or any other regulatory agency or professional associations within the last five (5) years? No The comment must be left blank for this response 3.0.2 Has your firm, or any member of your firm, been declared in default, assessed liquidated damages, terminated or removed from a contract or job related to the services your firm provides in the regular course of business within the last five (5) years? No The comment must be left blank for this response 3.0.3 Has your firm had against it or filed any requests for equitable adjustment, contract claims, Bid protests, or litigation in the past five (5) years that is related to the services your firm provides in the regular course of business? No The comment must be left blank for this response 3.0.4 Has your firm or any of its officers, been under investigation, charged, or convicted by any law enforcement agency or public entity for violations of the law, other than traffic violations? No The comment must be left blank for this response 3.0.5 Has your firm, or any of its principals, failed to qualify as a responsible Proposer/Bidder on any solicitation in the past five (5) years?No The comment must be left blank for this response 3.0.6 Has your firm, or any of its principals, declared bankruptcy or reorganized under Chapter 11?No The comment must be left blank for this response Answer the questions herein with a Yes or No answer. If you answer “Yes”, to any of the questions, explain the context surrounding the dispute, the nature of the dispute, the outcome or status of the dispute, and the monetary amounts, delay, or contract extension involved in the comment. If additional explanation is necessary, please upload a separate document with your response under the DD Attachment option. You further acknowledge by submitting a response that all statements made in response to these questions are true and agree and understand that any misstatement or misrepresentation or falsification of facts shall be cause for forfeiture of rights for further consideration of your response. 6 Questions 100.00% Complete Question Set 4: Key Staff Question Set 4 Instructions #Question Response Comment ? 4.1.1 What is the name of the individual that will serve as the Contract Manager ("CM")?Jannek Cederberg, PE TRUE 4.1.2 What is the CM's job title?Principal, Senior Coastal Engineer TRUE 4.1.3 How many years of experience does the PM have?20 years TRUE 4.1.4 How many years of program/project management experience does the PM have?20 years TRUE 4.1.5 How many years has the PM been employed with your company?11 years TRUE 4.1.6 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications the PM has:PE69839 TRUE 4.1.7 Does the CM have any concurrent commitments to other contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). Yes As a continuing services contract based on task orders, we will have appropriate staff available when a scope of services or notice to proceed is issued. TRUE ? 4.2.1 What is the name of the individual that will serve as the Program/Project Manager (\"PM\")?Jason Cummins, PE TRUE 4.2.2 What is the PM's job title?Principal, Senior Coastal and Engineer TRUE 4.2.3 How many years of experience does the PM have?15 years TRUE 4.2.4 How many years of program/project management experience does the PM have?15 years TRUE 4.2.5 How many years has the PM been employed with your company?11 years TRUE 4.2.6 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications the PM has:PE71538 TRUE 4.2.7 Does the PM have any concurrent commitments to other contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). Yes As a continuing services contract based on task orders, we will have appropriate staff available when a scope of services or notice to proceed is issued. TRUE ? 4.3.1 Please provide this staff member's name:Jordon Cheifet, PE, CFM TRUE 4.3.2 Please provide this staff member's job title:Senior Coastal Engineer TRUE 4.3.3 What role will this staff member fill for this contract?Coastal Engineering TRUE 4.3.4 Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the name of the employer.Yes The comment must be left blank for this response 4.3.5 How many years of experience does this staff member have?15 years TRUE 4.3.6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer?1 year TRUE 4.3.7 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications this staff member has:PE72876, CFM TRUE 4.3.8 Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). N/A The comment must be left blank for this response ? 4.4.1 Please provide this staff member's name:Leonard Barrera, EI TRUE 4.4.2 Please provide this staff member's job title:Coastal Engineer TRUE 4.4.3 What role will this staff member fill for this contract?Coastal Engineering TRUE 4.4.4 Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the name of the employer.Yes The comment must be left blank for this response 4.4.5 How many years of experience does this staff member have?6 years TRUE 4.4.6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer?6 years TRUE 4.4.7 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications this staff member has:N/A TRUE 4.4.8 Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). N/A The comment must be left blank for this response ? 4.5.1 Please provide this staff member's name:Danielle H. Irwin TRUE Respondent shall answer the following questions for each proposed Key Staff member. Include as much relevant detail as possible for each individual. There are question sets for up to 10 Key Staff members. If your company does not intend on proposing 10 Key Staff members, please insert "N/A" into the Response column for question sets in excess of the team being proposed. Contract Manager Project Manager Key Staff Member 1 Key Staff Member 2 Key Staff Member 3 4.5.2 Please provide this staff member's job title:Director TRUE 4.5.3 What role will this staff member fill for this contract?Regulory Permitting & Policy TRUE 4.5.4 Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the name of the employer.Yes The comment must be left blank for this response 4.5.5 How many years of experience does this staff member have?20 years TRUE 4.5.6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer?1.5 years TRUE 4.5.7 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications this staff member has: WEDG, CFM, PWS, LEED AP TRUE 4.5.8 Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). N/A The comment must be left blank for this response ? 4.6.1 Please provide this staff member's name:Gina Chiello TRUE 4.6.2 Please provide this staff member's job title:Senior Marine Scientist TRUE 4.6.3 What role will this staff member fill for this contract?Marine Science & Environmental Permitting TRUE 4.6.4 Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the name of the employer.Yes The comment must be left blank for this response 4.6.5 How many years of experience does this staff member have?12 years TRUE 4.6.6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer?4 years TRUE 4.6.7 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications this staff member has:N/A TRUE 4.6.8 Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). N/A The comment must be left blank for this response ? 4.7.1 Please provide this staff member's name:Sahar Haddadian, EI, PhD TRUE 4.7.2 Please provide this staff member's job title:Coastal Engineer TRUE 4.7.3 What role will this staff member fill for this contract?Coastal Engineering TRUE 4.7.4 Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the name of the employer.Yes The comment must be left blank for this response 4.7.5 How many years of experience does this staff member have?1 year TRUE 4.7.6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer?>1 year TRUE 4.7.7 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications this staff member has:N/A TRUE 4.7.8 Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). N/A The comment must be left blank for this response ? 4.8.1 Please provide this staff member's name:Colton Mannaning, EI TRUE 4.8.2 Please provide this staff member's job title:Coastal Engineer TRUE 4.8.3 What role will this staff member fill for this contract?Coastal Engineering TRUE 4.8.4 Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the name of the employer.Yes The comment must be left blank for this response 4.8.5 How many years of experience does this staff member have?2 years TRUE 4.8.6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer?>1 year TRUE 4.8.7 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications this staff member has:N/A TRUE 4.8.8 Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). N/A The comment must be left blank for this response ? 4.9.1 Please provide this staff member's name:Christie Hurley, WEDG TRUE 4.9.2 Please provide this staff member's job title:Senior Marine Scientist TRUE 4.9.3 What role will this staff member fill for this contract?Marine Science & Environmental Permitting TRUE 4.9.4 Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the name of the employer.Yes The comment must be left blank for this response Key Staff Member 4 Key Staff Member 5 Key Staff Member 6 Key Staff Member 7 4.9.5 How many years of experience does this staff member have?17 years TRUE 4.9.6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer?>1 year TRUE 4.9.7 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications this staff member has:WEDG TRUE 4.9.8 Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). N/A The comment must be left blank for this response ? 4.10.1 Please provide this staff member's name:Anne Laird TRUE 4.10.2 Please provide this staff member's job title:Senior Marine Scientist TRUE 4.10.3 What role will this staff member fill for this contract?Marine Science & Environmental Permitting TRUE 4.10.4 Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the name of the employer.Yes The comment must be left blank for this response 4.10.5 How many years of experience does this staff member have?23 years TRUE 4.10.6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer?1 year TRUE 4.10.7 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications this staff member has:N/A TRUE 4.10.8 Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). N/A The comment must be left blank for this response ? 4.11.1 Please provide this staff member's name:Rebecah Delp TRUE 4.11.2 Please provide this staff member's job title:Marine Scientist TRUE 4.11.3 What role will this staff member fill for this contract?Marine Science & Environmental Permitting TRUE 4.11.4 Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the name of the employer.Yes The comment must be left blank for this response 4.11.5 How many years of experience does this staff member have?3 years TRUE 4.11.6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer?3 years TRUE 4.11.7 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications this staff member has:N/A TRUE 4.11.8 Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). N/A The comment must be left blank for this response ? 4.12.1 Please provide this staff member's name:Francesca Fourney TRUE 4.12.2 Please provide this staff member's job title:Marine Scientist TRUE 4.12.3 What role will this staff member fill for this contract?Marine Science & Environmental Permitting TRUE 4.12.4 Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the name of the employer.Yes The comment must be left blank for this response 4.12.5 How many years of experience does this staff member have?5 years TRUE 4.12.6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer?>1 year TRUE 4.12.7 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications this staff member has:N/A TRUE 4.12.8 Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). N/A The comment must be left blank for this response Key Staff Member 8 Key Staff Member 9 Key Staff Member 10 94 Questions 100.00% Complete Question Set 5: Proposed Subcontractors #Question Response Comment ? 5.1.1 Company Name of Subcontractor:N/A TRUE 5.1.2 Subcontractor Address:N/A TRUE 5.1.3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment.N/A TRUE 5.1.4 Subcontractor's license number:N/A TRUE ? 5.2.1 Company Name of Subcontractor:N/A TRUE 5.2.2 Subcontractor Address:N/A TRUE 5.2.3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment.N/A TRUE 5.2.4 Subcontractor's license number:N/A TRUE ? 5.3.1 Company Name of Subcontractor:N/A TRUE 5.3.2 Subcontractor Address:N/A TRUE 5.3.3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment.N/A TRUE 5.3.4 Subcontractor's license number:N/A TRUE ? 5.4.1 Company Name of Subcontractor:N/A TRUE 5.4.2 Subcontractor Address:N/A TRUE 5.4.3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment.N/A TRUE 5.4.4 Subcontractor's license number:N/A TRUE ? 5.5.1 Company Name of Subcontractor:N/A TRUE 5.5.2 Subcontractor Address:N/A TRUE 5.5.3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment.N/A TRUE 5.5.4 Subcontractor's license number:N/A TRUE ? 5.6.1 Company Name of Subcontractor:N/A TRUE 5.6.2 Subcontractor Address:N/A TRUE 5.6.3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment.N/A TRUE 5.6.4 Subcontractor's license number:N/A TRUE ? 5.7.1 Company Name of Subcontractor:N/A TRUE 5.7.2 Subcontractor Address:N/A TRUE 5.7.3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment.N/A TRUE 5.7.4 Subcontractor's license number:N/A TRUE ? 5.8.1 Company Name of Subcontractor:N/A TRUE 5.8.2 Subcontractor Address:N/A TRUE 5.8.3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment.N/A TRUE 5.8.4 Subcontractor's license number:N/A TRUE ? 5.9.1 Company Name of Subcontractor:N/A TRUE 5.9.2 Subcontractor Address:N/A TRUE 5.9.3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment.N/A TRUE 5.9.4 Subcontractor's license number:N/A TRUE ? 5.10.1 Company Name of Subcontractor:N/A TRUE 5.10.2 Subcontractor Address:N/A TRUE 5.10.3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment.N/A TRUE 5.10.4 Subcontractor's license number:N/A TRUE Subcontractor 1 Subcontractor 2 Subcontractor 3 Subcontractor 4 Subcontractor 5 40 Questions 100.00% Complete Subcontractor 6 Subcontractor 7 Subcontractor 8 Subcontractor 9 Subcontractor 10 Technical Approach and Understanding Page 1 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Technical Approach and Understanding Understanding of the Village’s Needs, Goals, and Objectives The Village of Key Biscayne successfully implements a coastal management program to provide storm protection and recreational benefits along its coastline between Crandon Park and Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park. Cummins Cederberg understands the dedication of the Village to maintain one of its most valuable assets and has the technical knowledge to support this continued effort. We have assembled a qualified team of experts to support the Village’s ongoing coastal management efforts, as well as to develop new, innovative solutions and approaches for the Village’s coastal program. Implementation of Long-Range Beach Management Plan The Village’s coastal program has evolved and expanded since the Village assumed responsibility for beach management from Miami-Dade County through the Long-Range Beach Management Plan, which was first developed in 1997. Traditional, large-scale nourishment projects using offshore pumped sand and upland truck hauled sand, as well as periodic dune restoration projects, have helped to stabilize large portions of the Village’s coastline. Many of these projects and strategies were originally developed in the Long-Range Beach Management Plan and refined in the 2011 10-year Beach Maintenance Plan to include more frequent truck haul beach nourishment projects that provide tremendous benefit to the Village’s beaches. As the Village moves into the 21st century, new challenges must be addressed, including sea level rise, increasing storm intensity, and reduced sand resources. Cummins Cederberg has the expertise to help the Village preserve its beautiful coastline, while concurrently working to improve coastal resiliency for the future. Island Wide and Regional Management The Long-Range Beach Management Plan and 10-year Beach Maintenance Plan update allows the Village to take both a regional and targeted approach to coastal management. Cummins Cederberg has worked with municipalities to implement both large- and small-scale coastal engineering projects that require careful consideration of multiple stakeholder interests. Our staff has experience working on the Village’s Coastal Engineering projects, obtained while working with their respective former firms. This experience encompasses several Village projects outlined in the Long-Range Beach Management Plan, including the 2007 Dune Maintenance project, 2008 Hot Spot Beach Dune Enhancement, 2006-2011 Pipeline Corridor Seagrass Mitigation, 2011 Beach Management Strategy update, and the 2012 Beach Restoration project. Our staff also investigated disposal alternatives for the Village’s seaweed maintenance program while at their former firms. This experience will enable Cummins Cederberg to hit the ground running, as we understand the Village’s current needs, and we learn more about the Village’s goals moving forward. At a regional scale, Cummins Cederberg can work with the Village to better understand existing conditions, as well as plan for future changes. We have the in-house ability to support the Village by representing your interests relative to regulations and coastal engineering projects along the non-Village shoreline of Key Biscayne, as well as in Miami-Dade County, and throughout Southeast Florida relative to resiliency. Not only does Jason Cummins serve on the board for the Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park, but staff regularly participate in beach cleanups Technical Approach and Understanding Page 2 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Coastal Resiliency and Vulnerability Located on a barrier island, the Village’s planning for coastal resiliency and adaptation relative to sea level is highly important. Including sea level rise adaptation in the long-term planning will provide significant construction cost savings, as well as smoother implementation. We can assist the Village with implementing adaptation into capital improvement projects and zoning requirements. Of specific interest for the Village, Cummins Cederberg recently completed a Sea Level Rise Adaptation Capital Improvement Plan for the adjacent Crandon Park for Miami-Dade County - one of many we have completed for Miami Dade County’s waterfront parks. Among many important outcomes of this work, is the elevation of Crandon Boulevard and Rickenbacker Causeway, which serves as the only access to the Village. Elevation of these main roads should be considered relative to sea level rise and, at a minimum, storm surge events, to maintain emergency access. Cummins Cederberg is uniquely positioned and experienced relative to providing coastal engineering recommendations for infrastructure, including roads, seawalls, and critical facilities. Technical Approach and Understanding Page 3 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Approach to Project Development The Cummins Cederberg team of engineers, scientists, and technical staff are familiar with the Village’s goals for this RFQ and understand the technical expertise required to execute coastal engineering work orders, as well as marine structural engineering, environmental, and regulatory project components. Our technical staff have direct experience working within Miami-Dade County on waterfront projects, including the engineering design, permitting, and construction administration of coastal engineering projects. The following summarizes our technical approach to servicing this RFQ and describes how the Cummins Cederberg team can assist the Village with project development under each area of the scope of work described within this RFQ. Cummins Cederberg’s experience with waterfront projects will be leveraged in the following areas: Environmental Permitting ✓ Bathymetric Surveys ✓ Marine Resource Surveys ✓ Submerged Lands Ownership Determinations ✓ Pre-application Meetings with Regulatory Agencies ✓ Development of Conceptual Designs ✓ Mitigation Assessment and Negotiations ✓ Preparation and Processing of Permit Applications ✓ Preparation and Processing of Grant Funding Applications Engineering Design ✓ Structural Inspections - above and below water ✓ Structural Engineering Design ✓ Cost Estimates for Construction ✓ Construction Timeline Development ✓ Construction Plans and Technical Specifications ✓ Form Development ✓ Mitigation Layout and Design ✓ Beach Nourishment ✓ Coastal Vulnerability Analyses and Planning Construction Administration ✓ Pre-Bid Meetings and Bidding Support ✓ Submittal Review ✓ Pre-Construction Meetings ✓ QA/QC Coordination with Contractor ✓ Field Observation Reporting ✓ Pay Application Review/Approval ✓ Mitigation and Environmental Permit Compliance ✓ Project Closeout Response time is critical to ensure a task order request is completed in a timely manner without delays to the Village’s schedules. Our team will provide proper staffing and apply efficient communication protocols to ensure that personnel is assigned promptly after the Village’s request. Kickoff meetings will be scheduled immediately upon written notice from the Village, and a personalized agenda specific to the unique needs and requirements of each work order will be developed. Our team’s regulatory expertise will be used to meet regulatory permitting timeframes, which are critical to keeping a project moving forward during the permitting process, construction, and after construction, to satisfy mitigation and monitoring criteria. We understand that timely response to the regulatory agencies is necessary to complete a project on time, while maintaining “good-standing” with the regulatory agencies. Technical Approach and Understanding Page 4 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 The Village’s Class I Coastal Permit is expiring in 2022 and the Joint Coastal Permit is expiring in 2024, so the Village must keep permits active to enable quick response to a storm event. The permitting process can be lengthy; therefore, the engineering design and permitting process should be initiated very soon. We understand that the Village would like to consider incorporation of a coastal structure to provide additional storm protection and better retain sand on the beach; therefore, engineering design and analyses should commence as soon as possible. Although a 20-year permit was issued to the Village by the FDEP previously, it is unlikely that the new permit would be issued for a 20-year duration. Additionally, if a coastal structure is incorporated, the permit would likely be issued for a one-time construction event and subsequent permits authorizing maintenance events would be considered for a 10-year duration. The Village has implemented a long term biological and physical monitoring program and this information will be extremely helpful in calibrating the coastal model necessary for iterative evaluation of coastal structure(s) on the beach. The modeling will be used to demonstrate that potential impacts to ecological resources have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. It is also imperative that modeling be conducted to evaluate the level of storm protection being afforded to the upland infrastructure based on the beach designs considered, as the currently permitted beach design does not afford maximum protection throughout the construction template. If ecological mitigation is required to offset unavoidable impacts to benthic resources, the team at Cummins Cederberg is well qualified to identify, implement, and monitor a compensatory mitigation project for the Village. The team that resolved the outstanding mitigation associated with the previous impact for the Village leads Cummins Cederberg’s permitting and restoration programs and is excited for the opportunity to work for the Village again to ensure their shoreline management goals are achieved and the Village’s coastline is protected. Technical Approach and Understanding Page 5 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Approach to Project Management The Village borders nearly 30 acres of pristine Atlantic Ocean beachfront and has five public parks, making it a premier oceanfront destination. Our approach to project management will utilize a dynamic team of technical staff including coastal engineers, marine structural engineers, marine scientists, surveyors, geologists, and regulatory experts to meet the Village’s needs. Our project management process supports continuing service-based contracts by integrating all activities associated with each project into the following detailed 5-step approach: Step 1: Identify scope and budget. Early communication with the Village to gain a full understanding of needs and detailed scope of each work order. We will work with the Village to develop the scope, qualifications, staffing, and budget estimate for each required task. Developing a full understanding of the needs of the project early on will help to avoid change orders as the project progresses from planning and permitting through design and construction. Existing available data will be identified for potential cost savings and to expedite project completion. Step 2: Identify team members. Upon approval of the project scope by the Village, we will immediately coordinate with the team (e.g., coastal engineering, marine structural engineering, marine environmental services, geotechnical, surveying) to engage the necessary team members to fulfill the requirements of each task. Our goals during this step are to identify the best-suited personnel to address the task at hand, as well as to provide a highly responsive team that can conduct the requested work within the Village’s desired timeframe and budget. Step 3: Task proposal and project kickoff. Upon authorization to proceed, we will schedule a kickoff meeting and immediately notify the team to discuss the project assignment and develop and issue scopes of work for each subconsultant, responsibilities, project objectives, schedules, and expected deliverables. Effective channels of communication will be established, including points of contact and procedures for feedback. Step 4: Project management. We will coordinate with our internal team to monitor progress of the individual tasks and communicate regularly with Village staff to ensure our team is meeting or exceeding expected levels of quality and responsiveness. The assigned project manager will work with the Village to confirm our team is compliant with Village procedures and providing thorough project records. Step 5: Communication and reporting. As part of overall project management, our team will obtain regular progress updates from our subconsultants and provide progress reports to the Village as needed or as determined during project kickoff. We pride ourselves in prompt response times, whether by phone or email, for any inquiries that may arise. Identify scope and budget Identify team members Task proposal and project kickoff Project management Communication and reporting Technical Approach and Understanding Page 6 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Managing Project Costs & Budget Our general approach to managing overall cost and budget of a project is based on our experience planning, permitting, designing, and overseeing construction on coastal and marine projects, including beach nourishments. Cummins Cederberg will utilize our team of technical staff including coastal engineers, surveyors, geotechnical engineers, and regulatory experts to meet the Village's needs and deliver projects that meet the established budgets and schedules. While we understand many of the projects under this RFQ may include a construction phase, the following team management approach will be used for managing and integrating all activities associated with the project during the pre- construction phase, construction phase, and project closeout to manage project costs and budgets. Pre-Construction Phase Planning Phase: A carefully planned and managed strategy is required to properly execute a project in a cost-effective manner. The Cummins Cederberg team has experience with marine and coastal engineering projects for public and private clients. Project planning early in the project timeline will allow our team to establish a project baseline by collecting relevant data (e.g., bathymetric surveys, sediment testing, benthic resource surveys), consider input of stakeholders, and prioritize specific project components for based on need, funding, environmental challenges, and design constraints. Our technical approach includes early identification of available data to reduce duplication and costs to the Village during the Pre-Construction Phase. Review of existing data (e.g., maps, surveys, reports, maintenance records) affords our team the ability to conduct a preliminary screening of project components using both a qualitative and quantitative analysis. Utilizing existing available data allows us to reduce bathymetric surveying, benthic surveying, and geotechnical investigation efforts and can significantly reduce budget. During this phase, our grant team will be evaluating grant options and potential ways of aligning the project for increased outside funding. Permitting Phase: The environmental regulatory agency staff are tasked with enforcing their agency’s rules, while working with applicants to arrive at a permittable project. In southeast Florida, where protecting upland infrastructure is paramount, submerged ecological resources must also be protected. As consultants, it is our job to provide the regulatory agencies with the information they need to verify and document a project’s compliance with the guiding regulations to support agency staff recommendation for issuance of a permit. After collection of current baseline physical and biological data, and preliminary design of each project, Cummins Cederberg will meet with City staff to confirm preliminary project design. Cummins Cederberg will coordinate with the environmental agencies through pre-application meetings, during the permitting process, and during construction to ensure compliance with permit conditions and to minimize project delays. Design Phase: During the design phase, Cummins Cederberg will develop construction drawings, technical specifications, and bid documents to cover the intended scope, while also considering how each design detail may affect overall project cost through change orders or delays. Our experience with coastal and marine projects, including beach nourishment projects, will be leveraged to build flexibility into the design to proactively account for unknowns that may be encountered during bidding and construction, such as comprehensive technical specifications, reasonable construction schedules, and detailed submittal requirements. For example, while design of a beach nourishment project can primarily be done in the office using publicly available beach profile data, we will begin with field work including a pre-design site visit to verify the survey data, as conditions since the surveys were conducted may have changed. It is crucial to understand the existing conditions, how the proposed project will fit with areas to remain, how work areas will be accessed, and what land is needed for construction staging. A lack of foresight at this step can lead to scope creep, project delays, and potential change orders. Technical Approach and Understanding Page 7 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Bidding Assistance: We understand the Village Procurement Department will likely handle most of the bidding effort on the Village’s projects. With that in mind, our involvement typically includes bid document preparation, review of contractor qualifications, and preparation of a recommendation letter of the lowest qualified bidder. While preparing the bid schedule, we will pay careful attention to the bid items, units, and quantities to facilitate net-zero change orders, should they arise, to maintain overall budgets. We will also coordinate with the Village to evaluate and incorporate alternative scope items to be presented separately from the base scope, as an effort to avoid change orders in production. We believe it is critical to identify potential scope changes upfront at a time where negotiations are easier to administer in pre- construction, rather than dispute change order claims during production, where both budget and schedule are vulnerable. Our bidding assistance extends to detailed bid review and comparison upon receipt from solicited contractors. Our years of consulting within the marine industry has allowed us to compile a database of “market costs” from marine contractors. This historical information gives us insight into expected project costs, understanding if bids are over-priced, or if a completed bid form did not appropriately cover the intended scope (underpriced). In addition to project-specific items, we will review each bid to evaluate the following items:6 • Mobilization/Demobilization to assess if Contractor is front loading fees and/or potential staging area requirements, which may impact the public, including both residents and visitors. • Pre/Post-Construction Surveys to assess if the Contractor has included reasonable fees to document changes to existing conditions and as-built conditions for Village records. • Project Schedule to assess if the Contractor’s proposed schedule is reasonable and consistent with the schedule proposed for the project. • Contractor personal (e.g., Superintendent, Project Manager, QA/QC, Safety Representative) to assess if the Contractor has properly staffed the project to maintain schedule and oversight. • Construction methodology to assess if the Contractor’s approach is consistent with the environmental permit requirements for the project. Construction Phase Pre-Construction Meeting: Cummins Cederberg will organize and coordinate a pre-construction meeting to meet and introduce team members from Cummins Cederberg, the Village, and the Contractor’s team. The primary objective will be to establish a chain of communication and identify team member roles/responsibilities to optimize workflow and troubleshooting of production issues. During this stage, we will review the Contractor’s initial schedule, identity deliverables with priority release or lead- times, and discuss protocols for submittals, Requests for Information (RFIs), and progress meetings/inspections. Pre-Mobilization Coordination: Prior to Contractor mobilization, Cummins Cederberg will coordinate a site meeting to meet with essential Contractor personal with the intent of discussing Contractor’s work sequence and logistics. Effort will be made to proactively review and coordinate any forecasted workflow hang-ups, potential work restrictions, maintenance of traffic, management of public safety, and timelines for site visits. During this period, Cummins Cederberg will review priority submittals and/or RFIs, as needed, to ensure the Contractor will be ready to start work on time, wo rk in an uninterrupted manner, and remain productive throughout the construction schedule. Production Monitoring and Oversight: Once construction commences, or at points soon before, Cummins Cederberg will coordinate and conduct periodic progress meetings with the Village and Contractor. During these meetings, we will review the status of the completed work, forecasts for upcoming work, and discuss any active items to promote project progression. We will summarize the Technical Approach and Understanding Page 8 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 discussions and collect comments to prepare and distribute meeting minutes to the Village and Contractor. Site Visits and Observation Reports: Cummins Cederberg will assist the Village with engineering services, technical assistance, and on-site observations during construction to certify the project is being constructed in compliance with the contract documents. We will prepare and distribute Field Observation Reports including photos, written observation, and any other figures to document the observations recorded during the site visit(s). Further, we will immediately communicate and follow-up on any critical observations noted that could impact the project schedule and/or budget. Our Construction Administration metrics include observation and review of the following to manage the overall budget and schedule for the project: • Observe the Contractor’s work for compliance with the contract documents and permits. • Photograph and document the project as the work progresses. • Periodic drone surveys and/or aerial surveys to quickly monitor progress. The findings can be deployed on the internet for review among project stakeholders. • Communicate issues, deviations, and/or inconsistencies that may arise. • Visually assess the quality of materials delivered to the project site. • Review material delivered to the site. • Monitor installed work components to verify work is being performed as intended. Pay Application Reviews: As the project progresses, Cummins Cederberg will review pay applications from the Contractor to confirm the requisitions reflect the percentage complete onsite. Part of this review will be to confirm the billed work has been formally observed/inspected and accepted by the Village prior to approving payment release. Our review will also consider the bid amounts for The Completed Work vs. The Billed Amount to avoid “overpaying” for the work completed. This is a precautionary measure to ensure project funds are not dispersed too soon. Project Close-out Phase Upon the milestone of substantial completion, Cummins Cederberg will complete the required walkthroughs to initiate the punch list with the Village and synchronize project schedule end date. We will compile a punch list with Village representatives and the Contractor to ensure work is completed to the satisfaction of the Village and in compliance with contract documents, as well as regulatory agencies. These items may include site restoration (e.g., construction access pavers, vegetation), debris removal (e.g., rocks, grade stakes), and final preparation of the work for public use. Once all punch list items have been completed, Cummins Cederberg will perform a final walkthrough at the request of the Village to certify completion of the work and release final payment(s) to the Contractor, including release of retainage. Prior to this release, we will assist the Village in resolving any potential cost items. Cummins Cederberg will also assemble the required documentation, water quality testing, surveys, and material delivery tickets to prepare the final project report for submittal the environmental agencies to close out the permits. Technical Approach and Understanding Page 9 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Previous Experience We understand that beach nourishment is a vital component of the Village’s coastal management program and each project brings unique challenges and complexities. Cummins Cederberg has successfully implemented the procedures, benchmarks, and methods detailed above to deliver multiple coastal and marine engineering projects, including beach nourishment projects, on time and on budget in South Florida and internationally. The planning, permitting, design, and construction of projects along the water is complex and presents many challenges including challenging working conditions, high-profile settings, continuous public use, sensitive environmental resources, and dynamic design criteria (e.g., winds, waves, currents). We have relevant experience with both large and small-scale beach nourishment projects. Our team of coastal engineers has worked with public and private clients to provide "field to finish" services including design, preparation of construction documents (e.g., plans and technical specifications), bidding support, cost estimates, and construction administration. Our team understands the technical requirements of beach design along the unique coastline of South Florida, specifically the Village of Key Biscayne. The following examples showcase Cummins Cederberg’s ability to manage complicated marine and coastal engineering projects. Cummins Cederberg is the Engineer of Record for the Coco Plum Beach Restoration project for the City of Marathon in Monroe County. The beach is one of the few public beaches in the Florida Keys and experiences significant erosion. We developed a numerical model to simulate wave propagation and to identify erosional hot spots. Due to extensive nearshore seagrass beds and limited project funding, the beach was designed to place approximately 700 CY of beach compatible fill above the mean high-water line to restore the berm and dune at an erosional hotspot. Construction documents, cost estimates, and bidding assistance were provided to the City of Marathon. The project was completed on time and on budget in December 2020. Construction required continuous oversight of the Contractor due to logistical challenges of working in the Florida Keys, including load limits on bridges accessing the site. Completed in 2018, the Hillsboro Club Dune Repair project included placement of approximately 1,500 CY of beach compatible sand to rebuild the dune fronting a private beach in the Town of Hillsboro Beach in Broward County. The beach and dune system had experienced erosion from storms between 2014 and 2017, including Hurricanes Matthew and Irma. The project utilized "sand of opportunity" from a nearby maintenance dredging project along the Intracoastal Waterway to minimize cost to the owner. Cummins Cederberg designed the restoration project to place the maximum volume of sand in the permitted template to provide maximum protection to the upland infrastructure. Construction documents, cost estimates, bidding assistance, and construction administration were provided by Cummins Cederberg to the condominium owner. A series of nor'easters in early 2015 caused significant erosion along the beaches of Miami Beach. Cummins Cederberg was engaged by Miami-Dade County to design an emergency 20,000 CY beach nourishment project to restore the established dune system and emergency access. Cummins Cederberg obtained permits very quickly for this project, which required coordination with multiple stakeholders to expedite issuance and construction. The berm and dune were designed to avoid impacts to nearshore hardbottom. An Equilibrium Toe of Fill (ETOF) analysis was performed to optimize the fill template and avoid impacts to nearshore marine resources. Cummins Cederberg provided construction documents, cost estimates, and bidding assistance to the County. Construction of the project was completed in 2015. In addition to our domestic beach nourishment design experience, Cummins Cederberg has designed many beach nourishment projects in the Caribbean. While like the coast of Key Biscayne, the irregular shaped beaches of the small Caribbean islands present additional design challenges not seen along the relatively uniform shorelines of South Florida. Further, these projects not only nourished existing beaches, but also created beaches where none existed prior. Cummins Cederberg has designed several Technical Approach and Understanding Page 10 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 projects in the Bahamas and Dominican Republic, which placed between 10,000 and 500,000 CY of sand on the shorelines. Public/Private Client List Page 1 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Public/Private Client List - 1015 Stillwater, LLC Count - 1173 Hillsboro Mile Condominium Association Count - 12800 Brickell Key Count - 26600 Miami County Day School Count - 5900 Collins Avenue Condominium Association Count - 5th Street Marina, LLC Count - A.R.C. Contractors, Inc. Count - AD1 Global Count - Advanced Archaelogy, Inc. Count - Adventure Environmental, Inc. Count - Akerman LLP Count - Americo Barreiro Count - Arlen House West Condominium Association Count - ASAP Installations, LLC Count - Balmoral Group Count - Bermello Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Count - Betancourt Construction, Inc. Count - BISCAYNE BAY PILOTS Count - Brandy Marine International, LLC Count - Buttonwood Bay Condominium Association, Inc. Count - Carnahan, Proctor and Cross, Inc. Count - Carrollton School of the Sacred Heart Count - CENTRAL FLORIDA EQUIPMENT Count - CHEN MOORE AND ASSOCIATES Count - Chris McFarlane Count - CITY OF MIAMI, PARKS & RECREATION Count - Coastal Towers Condominium Association Count - Coastland Construction, Inc. Count - COLONIAL CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION Count - CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION OF DRAKE TOWER, INC. Count - Cooley LLP Count - Coral Bay Racquet Club Count - Coronado at Highland Beach Condominium Association Count - Costa Brava Condominium Association Count - Dania Marina Partners, LLC Count - DAS Count - Davis Environmental Solutions Count - Derecktor Florida, Inc. Count - Eastern Shores White House Association, Inc. Count - Eden Isles Condominium Association Count - Emerald Oaks Homeowners Association Count - Engineering and Technical Services Count - FIFTEEN GROUP Count - Fiftysixsixty Condominium Association Count - Fisher Island Slip Widening Count - Flagship Services Corporation Count - Georgeé & Company Count - Harbour Construction, Inc. Count - Housing Authority of the City of Miami Beach Count - J. J. Goldasich & Associates, Inc. Count - Jungle Island Count - King Cole Condominium Association Count - Lakes Engineering, Inc. Count - Landings of Largo Count - Le Club International Condominium Association Count - Leno Dredging & Hauling, Inc. Count - Lincoln Bay Towers Condominium Association Count - Louis Berger Count - Marina Palms Yacht Club Count - Mariners Bay Condominium Association Count - Max Marine and Foundation, Inc. Count - Miami Beach JCC Count - Miami-Dade County RER Count - Miami-Dade Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces Count - MSC Cruises, S.A. Count - MWH Constructors, Inc. Count - New Millennium Design Consultants, Inc. Count - Nirvana Master Association Count - Ocean Consulting, LLC Count - Ocean Pointe Condominium Association Count - Old Port Cove Holdings Count - One Miami Condominium Association Count Public/Private Client List Page 2 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 - Orange, Ltd. Count - OSL Concrete Inc. Count - Palm Bay Marina Count - Palm Bay Towers Condominium Association Count - Paradise Found Development Count - Paramount Bay Condominium Association Count - Pelican Reef Condominium Association Count - Porta Bella Yacht & Tennis Club Count - Raymond Jungles, Inc. Count - Reynolds Smith & Hills Count - Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. Count - Royal Harbour Yacht Club Count - Royal Harbour Yatch Club Marina Condominium Assocation, Inc. Count - SAFO LLC Count - Sandra Walters Consultants, Inc. Count - Singerman Real Estate, LLC Count - Skyline Management Group, Inc. Count - SRC Properties, LLC Count - Stranahan House Museum Count - Structurmarine Count - Sun Communities Count - Sunset Harbour Yacht Club Count - T.Y. Lin International Group Count - The Aquazul Condominium Association Count - The Chappell Group, Inc. Count - The Martinez Law Firm, P.A. Count - The Related Group Count - The River Front Master Association, Inc. Count - The Tides on Hollywood Beach Condominium Association Count - The Vizcayans Count - Tierra Consulting Count - Triton Tower Condominium, Inc. Count - Turnberry Isle Condo Assoc., Inc. Count - Turnberry Isle South Count - Universal Marine Center Count - Venetia Condominium Association Count - Villa Regina Condominium Count - Walton Lantaff Schroeder & Carson, LLP Count - Weber Group, Inc. Count - Westhorp & Associates, Inc. Count - Winston Towers 500 Association, Inc. Count - Winston Towers 700 Condominium Assoc. Count Licenses Page 1 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Licenses Available Facilities, Technology, and Resources Page 1 Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services Village of Key Biscayne RFQ No. 2021-08 Available Facilities, Technology, and Resources Cummins Cederberg has offices located in South Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Jupiter, and Tallahassee. This contract will be primarily serviced from our flagship South Miami location, where most of the firm’s personnel are located, including a full team of coastal engineers and marine scientists. This allows rapid mobilization and quick decision making for the Village’s needs under this RFQ. With Cummins Cederberg on your team, you get unmatched technical expertise from a small, experienced, local firm with staff experience working on Village projects, who can provide the services the Village needs without extensive corporate overhead. The Cummins Cederberg team includes coastal engineers and marine scientists with extensive beach nourishment design experience in South Florida and throughout the Caribbean. Our experience includes the design of public and private beach nourishment projects utilizing offshore and upland sand sources to provide storm protection, restore critically eroded beaches, and provide recreational and biological resources. We have designed these projects utilizing both desktop and advanced numerical modeling tools, including, but not limited to, MIKE (DHI), Delft (Deltares), SBEACH, ADCIRC, and MATLAB. Specific numerical modeling experience includes beach nourishment design (e.g., ETOF analysis, equilibrium beach profiles, storm protection), the analysis of wave propagation both offshore and in shallow coastal areas, FEMA risk hazard map modeling, hydrodynamic flow in inlets and estuaries, and sediment transport associated with wave and current dynamics, as well as the interactions of natural and manmade coastal structures such as jetties, groins, breakwaters, rock headlands, and offshore reefs. Our project engineers are responsible for the investigation, planning, design, and construction management of every coastal project, that includes beach nourishment, shoreline stabilization, coastal structures, inlet management, biological monitoring, and restoration. In addition, Cummins Cederberg has an in-house team of marine biologists and regulatory experts with experience in local, state, and federal coastal permitting, marine resource surveys, artificial reef design and monitoring, NEPA documentation, Endangered Species Act Section 7 consultation, and Essential Fish Habitat Assessments. Our team includes former executive level Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) staff with intimate knowledge of the regulatory process and professional relationships with agency personnel, which streamlines projects allowing for quicker processing. We bring project experience related to regional sand management, inlet management, beach nourishment, restoration and FEMA funding from storm impacts, and compliance with stringent sand specifications and hardbottom mitigation requirements. Our biologists work hand in hand with our engineers to ensure projects are completed on time and within budget to exceed project goals, while protecting natural coastal resources and maintaining technical compliance. Our construction management staff have experience on both the contractor and design side, with project management and oversight specifically for beach nourishment projects using truck haul and dredging in South Florida. Specific experience included review of contract terms, development of construction specifications, construction methodology, on-site observation, construction monitoring, permit compliance, and submittal reviews. Having former coastal and marine contractors on staff can result in a substantial cost savings when it comes to constructability reviews and estimating. During construction planning, Cummins Cederberg will collect the bid documents for the Village, as well as manage the bid process. Our construction management process includes regular site visits and preparation of progress reports for Village staff to document construction and confirm compliance with the contract documents. Contract Manager Jannek Cederberg, PE Project Manager Jason Cummins, PE Coastal Engineering Jannek Cederberg, PE Jason Cummins, PE Jordon Cheifet, PE, CFM Leonard Barrera, EI Colton Manning, EI Sahar Haddadian, PhD, EI Marine Science & Environmental Permitting Danielle H. Irwin, CFM, WEDG Gina Chiello Christie Hurley, WEDG Anne Laird Rebecah Delp Francesca Fourney Marine Engineering & Construction Management Jason Cummins, PE Jason Taylor, PE Rasheed Muslimani, PE, PMP Jon Cunningham, EI Ken Chang, EI Colton Manning, EI Team Organizational Chart Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services RFQ No. 2021-08 www.CumminsCederberg.com Page 1 Jannek Cederberg, PE Principal Engineer, Contract Manager EXPERIENCE Miami Beach Emergency Truck Haul, Miami Beach, Florida. Performed surveying, data collection, volumetric and equilibrium toe of fill analysis based on available historical beach profiles for four segments of beach. This information was utilized in designing the expansion of beach segments for maintenance nourishment. A total of 20,000 cubic yards of material placed along a heavily eroded segment of shoreline. Crandon Park Sea Level Rise Mitigation Roadmap, Key Biscayne, Florida. Served as Senior Project Manager to prepare a Sea Level Rise Flood Mitigation Study to analyze the impacts of sea level rise on the park’s infrastructure and operations, as well as develop flood mitigation concepts for capital improvement planning and budgeting. Crandon Park Marina, Key Biscayne, Florida. Field investigations including bathymetric surveying, tide and current measurements, marine resource survey, and sediment sampling. Tidal hydrodynamic modeling along with wave and sediment transport analyses conducted to determine source and magnitude of marina sedimentation problem. Alternatives assessment of potential coastal structures to inhibit sedimentation and need for periodic dredging. Coco Plum Beach Erosion Study and Beach Design, Marathon, Florida. Prepared an erosion study for the City of Marathon in Monroe County. Design and permitting of truck haul project for placement of sand above the mean high-water line. Coordinate with environmental agencies for approval of design and sand source. (City of Marathon, 2020) MSC Cruises Ocean Cay Marine Reserve, The Bahamas. Design of 10,000 feet of beach and 5,000 feet of shoreline stabilization for proposed out-island cruise destination. Detailed coastal engineering analysis, including numerical modeling of hurricane impacts. Engineering design of beach improvements and shoreline stabilization of reshaped island perimeter. Hollywood/Hallandale Beach Restoration, Hollywood, Florida. Coastal engineering and environmental permit processing for a 400,000 cubic yard truck haul beach fill project. Engineering design of beach fill template. Cross-shore sediment transport modeling. Geotechnical investigations. Coastal engineering analysis including extreme waves and storm surge. Regional Sediment Transport Study, Miami, Florida. Shoreline and sediment transport studies performed on the coast of Miami-Dade County between Bakers Haulover Inlet and Government Cut. Numerical modeling conducted utilizing Danish Hydraulics Institute (DHI) MIKE 21 and LITPACK software to simulate waves and nearshore coastal processes. Reference 1: Angel Trujillo, Miami-Dade County, 305-755-7800 Reference 2: Carlos Solis, City of Marathon, 305-289-5008 Reference 3: Eric Anderson, Palm Beach County, 561-233-2514 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 20 EDUCATION ▪ M.S. Coastal Engineering, Technical University of Denmark LICENSES ▪ Florida PE No. 69839 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ Permanent International Association of Navigation Congress ▪ Member of PIANC Working group ▪ Design and Operational Guidelines for “Superyacht Facilities” ▪ Danish Society of Hydraulic Engineering ▪ Port Everglades Association ▪ Florida Association of Environmental Professionals ▪ The Environmental Land Use Law Section of the Florida Bar Jason R. Cummins, PE Principal Engineer, Project Manager EXPERIENCE Miami Beach Emergency Truck Haul, Miami Beach, Florida. Performed surveying, data collection, volumetric and equilibrium toe of fill analysis based on available historical beach profiles and proposed fill volumes for four segments of beach. Designed fill template to maximize emergency truck haul nourishment based on observed eroded conditions. Survey stake-out of proposed fill template. Village of Key Biscayne Beach Nourishment, Key Biscayne, Florida. Coastal engineering and environmental permitting for 120,000 cubic yard beach fill and dune restoration project. Beach profile and hydrographic surveys conducted, along with sand source search, jet probes, vibracores, and sediment compatibility analysis. Coordination of dune vegetation planting and exotic removal plan. Crandon Park Sea Level Rise Mitigation Roadmap, Key Biscayne, Florida. Assisted with a Sea Level Rise Flood Mitigation Study to analyze the impacts of sea level rise on the park’s infrastructure and operations, as well as develop flood mitigation concepts for capital improvement planning and budgeting. Sunny Isles Coastal Analysis, Sunny Isles, Florida. Assessment of local sediment transport characteristics and the potential for shoreline stabilization along Sunny Isles Beach. An evaluation of nearshore coastal processes and sediment transport characteristics in the project vicinity was completed. Based on the assessment, a beach management plan was prepared for long-term beach planning. Hillsboro/Deerfield Beach Nourishment, Hillsboro Beach, Florida. Coastal engineering and environmental permit processing for 400k cubic yard beach fill project. Engineering design of beach fill template. Cross- shore sediment transport modeling. Geotechnical investigations and dredge plan for offshore borrow source. Construction drawings and technical specifications. Tides Condominium Risk Mapping, Hollywood, Florida. Erosion and scour assessment based on existing beach and seawall conditions. Numerical modeling of wave propagation, storm surge and potential wave run up impacts. Prepared and processed letter of map revision (LOMR) based on detailed survey information and coastal design conditions. Regional Sediment Transport Study, Miami, Florida. Shoreline and sediment transport studies performed on the coast of Miami-Dade County between Bakers Haulover Inlet and Government Cut. Numerical modeling conducted utilizing Danish Hydraulics Institute (DHI) MIKE 21 and LITPACK software to simulate waves and nearshore coastal processes. Reference 1: Ken Blair, Seahaven Marina, 561-625-9443 Reference 2: Ed Scalzitti, Colonial Club, 561-676-4952 Reference 3: James Brewer, Derecktor Shipyards, 954-920-5756 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 15 EDUCATION ▪ MSc Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering, University of Florida ▪ BSc Civil Engineering, University of Florida LICENSES ▪ Florida PE No. 71538 CERTIFICATIONS ▪ Certified Diver ▪ FHWA A-NHI 130091 Underwater Bridge Inspection – National Highway Institute and Association of Diving Contractors PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ Urban Land Institute (ULI) SE Florida/Caribbean, Member ▪ American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE ▪ American Institute of Architects ▪ South Florida Association of Environmental Professionals Jordon P. Cheifet, PE, CFM Senior Coastal Engineer EXPERIENCE City of Deerfield Beach Stormwater Master Plan, Deerfield Beach, Florida. Conducted a field investigation to evaluate existing coastal stormwater and flood defense structures in tidal waters relative to service life for the City. The project included a detailed analysis of historical water levels to establish design water levels based on king tides, storm events, and long-term sea level rise projections. Recommendations for maintenance and repairs were summarized in a Coastal Condition and Resiliency Report. NSU Ocean Campus Groin & Wharf Design, Dania Beach, Florida. Development of conceptual plans related to relocating the groin and fortifying the wharf and seawall to accommodate a USACE dredging project at the NSU Oceanographic Center. Project included evaluation of existing geotechnical data, navigational feasibility, cost estimating, and wave climate analysis. Coordination with U.S. Navy and U.S. Coast Guard to discuss concepts and feasibility. Mooring Buoy Design, Miami, Florida. Provided coastal engineering design for new mooring buoys at 6 artificial/natural reef sites in the Atlantic Ocean. The project included sediment probes to determine buoy foundation requirements, engineering design, and preparation of plans and specifications. Scheduled to begin construction Summer 2020. Coco Plum Beach Nourishment, City of Marathon, Florida. Provided coastal engineering services for a beach restoration project along approximately 1,500 feet of shoreline eroded from Hurricane Irma. Project included beach template design, development of technical specifications, and sediment characterization. Obtained FDEP CCCL permit while coordinating with City staff and local sand mines. Project is scheduled to begin construction Summer 2020. Hillsboro Imperial Condominium Seawall Condition Assessment, Hillsboro Beach, Florida. Performed a condition assessment of 250 feet of seawall fronting the Atlantic Ocean shoreline. An engineering report was developed to document the observed conditions and assist in developing repair and maintenance recommendations based on the severity of damage and results of the initial investigation. Kristi House Shoreline Stabilization, Miami, Florida. Provided structural/coastal engineering design for 525 feet of shoreline stabilization along an eroded portion of Wagner Creek. The project included a steel sheet pile bulkhead and armor stones with transition grading to the existing upland parking lot. Services performed included scour analyses, wave load analyses, and structure design. The project is currently in environmental permitting with construction expected to commence in 2021. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 15 EDUCATION ▪ M.Sc. Ocean and Resources Engineering, University of Hawaii ▪ B.Sc. Civil Engineering, Pennsylvania State University LICENSES ▪ Florida PE No. 72876 CERTIFICATIONS ▪ Professional Engineer – Florida No. 72876 ▪ Certified Floodplain Manager ▪ Certified Video Ray ROV Operator ▪ Surface Supplied Air Underwater Inspection Certification ▪ Advanced/Rescue/Nitrox SCUBA PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ Association of State Floodplain Managers, Member ▪ Florida Floodplain Managers Association, Member Leonard Barrera Allen, EI Coastal Engineer EXPERIENCE Crandon Shoreline Stabilization, Crandon Park, Key Biscayne, Florida. Stabilization of approximately 315 linear feet of shoreline in Crandon Park, Key Biscayne. Design of the shoreline stabilization using rock revetment composed of native lime rock. Created approximate area of 2800 sq ft for the planting of mangroves located directly behind the rock revetment. Crandon Park Sea Level Rise Flood Mitigation Study, Coral Gables, Florida. Assisted in preparing a Sea Level Rise Flood Mitigation Study to analyze the impacts of sea level rise on the park’s infrastructure and operations, as well as develop flood mitigation concepts for capital improvement planning and budgeting. Village of Bal Harbour Dune Nourishment, Bal Harbour, Florida. Prepared a nourishment plan for the placement of 600 cy of sand. Drone aerial photographs were collected during construction. This project is helping restore hurricane impacted dunes to their pre-storm condition, protecting the Village from wind and wave erosion while allowing beachfront access to residents and visitors. Aquazul Dune Repair, Lauderdale‐By‐The‐Sea, Florida. Repair of an eroded dune. An assessment was done to identify the required components, funds, vegetation, and repairs needed for the eroded dune. A new dune layout was constructed to establish the locations of the new vegetation and placement of sand. Coco Plum Beach Erosion Study and Beach Design, Marathon, Florida. Services under this project included the implementation, recommendations from the erosion study, assisting the City by coordinating with the regulatory agencies, and the preparation and submittals of the necessary permits. A detailed statistical analysis of offshore wave data was conducted along with a wave propagations study. Based on the results the underlying coastal processes of the erosion trends were documented and utilized in the beach and coastal structure design process. The area triggering the beach erosion was identified and solutions for stabilizing this area, while still providing sandy beach access, was developed. Brickell Key Island Coastal Resiliency Study, Brickell Key Island, Florida. Site inspection to identify vulnerable areas, including the perimeter of the entire Brickell Key Island. Analyses of sea level rise and extreme tide events were conducted to understand water level design conditions. The potential for increased storm impacts was assessed. Recommendations for long term planning was provided along with mitigation options. Construction documents and environmental permitting was conducted for the design. The design focused on adapting existing infrastructure to provide a cost-effective solution. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 6 EDUCATION ▪ M. Sc. Ocean Engineering, University of Miami ▪ B. Sc. Civil Engineering, University of Miami REGISTRATION ▪ Engineering Intern, E.I. – Reg. No. 1100019727 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) ▪ Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE) ▪ Urban Land Institute (ULI) SE Florida/Caribbean ▪ Port Everglades Association Sahar Haddadian, EI, PhD Coastal Engineer EXPERIENCE Peanut Island Flood Shoal Dredging Project, Riviera Beach, Florida. Assisted with the coastal analysis and dredge design for the Peanut Island dredging project. The analysis focuses on potential effects of dredging such as sand accretion, reduction of sediment, and how long until the project needs to be dredged again. Haulover Park Sea Level Rise Mitigation Plan, Miami, Florida. Prepared flood inundation and sea level rise analysis for the Haulover Park Sea Level Rise Mitigation Plan. This plan will lead to the development of mitigation solutions and cost estimates to address the effects of sea level rise that impact the public’s use of amenities. Crandon Park Sea Level Rise Mitigation Plan, Miami, Florida. Prepared flood inundation and sea level rise analysis for the Crandon Park Sea Level Rise Mitigation Plan. This plan will lead to the development of mitigation solutions and cost estimates to address the effects of sea level rise that impact the public’s use of amenities. Glass Window Bridge Coastal Engineering, Eleuthera, The Bahamas. The project includes reconstruction of an existing bridge and roadway, which provides the sole access between the northern and southern regions of the island. Sahar is responsible for the modeling of wave propagation and extreme tide events. Clifton Point LNG Facility, New Province, The Bahamas. The project includes conducting Coastal Engineering analysis to determine hydrodynamic conditions in the Project site. The goal is to determine the sediment transport processes during the construction of the pier and fate of potential oil spill during operational phase. Sahar is responsible for modeling of sediment transport and oil spill (…, 2020- Ongoing). FDOT Sea Level Rise, Miami, Florida. The project includes the sea level rise analysis and determination of the potential future flooding. Sahar is responsible for determining of the King tide in the project area and conducting sea level rise analysis to determine possible areas and road that would experience flooding (2020 - Ongoing) Sunset Harbor Wave Screen, City of Miami Beach, Florida. The project includes the construction of a new wave screen on the seaward side of the existing deck. Sahar was responsible for calculation of the wave load and attenuation to properly design the wave screen. Great Stirrup Cay Development, Berry Islands, The Bahamas. Coastal and marine improvements to cruise ship private island destination improvements to accommodate 5,000 passenger cruise ships. Flow3d analysis for wave load modeling. Engineering design of beach expansion using coastal structures, and reinforcement of existing iron-shore. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 1 EDUCATION ▪ Ph.D. Civil Engineering- Coastal Engineering, Louisiana State University ▪ M.Sc. Civil Engineering- Hydraulic Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran ▪ B.Sc. Civil Engineering- Structural Engineering, University of Tabriz, Iran CERTIFICATIONS ▪ Engineer-in-Training (EIT) PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ Society of Women Engineers ▪ American Society of Civil Engineers ▪ Coasts, Oceans, Ports, and Rivers Institute Colton Manning, EI Coastal Engineer EXPERIENCE Black Point Park and Marina and Homestead Bayfront Park Sea Level Rise Road Map and Action Plan, Homestead, Florida. Performed site infrastructure assessments for both Black Point Park and Marina and Homestead Bayfront Park to determine infrastructure at risk of inundation. Colton is currently analyzing the topography of both sites through Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and Digital Elevation Model (DEM) information compared to measured site-specific water levels and future sea level rise projections. Great Stirrup Cay Environmental Impact Assessment, The Berry Islands, The Bahamas. Worked with marine scientists to determine potential environmental impacts of constructing cruise ship piers on Great Stirrup Cay. Bathymetric and topographic data, construction material, geotechnical characteristics, native vegetation and animalia, and potential runoff were evaluated to determine potential effects on environmental resources. This information was compared to local coastal processes such as tides, waves, currents, sediment transportation, and sea level rise and atmospheric processes such as historic hurricanes to determine how the nearshore environment would be altered. Project alternatives were reviewed to finalize a design that minimized environmental imprints. Indian Creek Country Club Coastal Vulnerability and Resiliency Planning, Indian Creek, Florida. Analyzed the topography of the Indian Creek Country Club through Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and Digital Elevation Model (DEM information compared to calculated existing and future site-specific water surface levels. Determined infrastructure at the greatest risk of short-term and long-term inundation during high tides, extreme tides (“king” tides), and storm events. Future water levels were compared to existing infrastructure service life to develop flood mitigation concepts and implementation strategies to minimize construction costs while protecting upland amenities through 2100. Lyford Cay Beach Improvements, New Providence, The Bahamas. Analyzed common and extreme wind and wave conditions and assisted with the conceptual design of coastal rock groins to stabilize and enhance a private beachfront property experiencing significant erosion. Staniard Creek Bridge Modification Coastal Engineering Analysis, Andros, The Bahamas. Performed numerical modeling analyses for the relocation of the Staniard Creek Bridge, removal of existing mangroves below the Staniard Creek Bridge, and installation of culverts beneath the causeway connecting Staniard Creek to mainland Andros. The analyses demonstrated how these proposed works affected the hydrodynamic and sedimentation characteristics in the area. These characteristics determined whether modifications would have adverse erosional and hydrodynamic effects on the area and where alterations would occur. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 3 EDUCATION ▪ M.Sc. Coastal Engineering, University of Florida ▪ B.Sc. Civil Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology CERTIFICATIONS ▪ Florida Engineering Intern No. 1100021938 ▪ NAUI Open Water SCUBA No. 48756AF ▪ PADI Emergency Oxygen Provider No. 20100K0289 ▪ Emergency First Response No. 20100K0143 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ American Society of Civil Engineers ▪ Coasts, Oceans, Ports, and Rivers Institute ▪ American Institute of Steel Construction Danielle H. Irwin, CFM, PWS, WEDG Environmental Permitting & Regulatory Policy EXPERIENCE Bal Harbour Coastal Program Management, Village of Bal Harbour, Florida. Provided ongoing coastal management support for the Village including development of a Village-wide dune restoration plan, permitting and design of a beach nourishment project, providing drone aerial surveys of the Village shoreline, and representing the Village on the Bakers Haulover Inlet Technical Advisory Committee. Most recently, Danielle assisted with the Village’s dune restoration project in 2020, providing nourishment for the area from coastal erosion and during recent hurricanes. City of Miami DDA Resiliency Guidelines, City of Miami, Florida. Drafted shoreline resiliency guidelines for the City’s Downtown Development Authority including recommended seawall elevation standards and living shoreline best management practices. Hollywood Beach Nourishment, Hollywood, Florida. Provided consulting services related to the permitting and compliance assistance for the City’s beach nourishment project. Services include the development of their biological monitoring plan, permit modifications at the local, state, and federal level, and compliance assistance following the biological monitoring. St. Lucie Inlet, Martin County, Florida. Coordinated and oversaw the FDEP review and approval of the update to the sediment budget, sand bypassing volume, and Inlet Management Plan. Negotiated agreements with the County, City of Jupiter Island, and residents on inlet dredging and beach placement frequency and locations. Post Hurricane A1A Reconstruction, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. Coordination of FDEP staff review for re-construction of storm damaged North Ocean Blvd. (aka State Road A1A). The project included reconstruction of the road, dune enhancement and plantings, sidewalk, curb and gutter demolition and reconstruction, construction of a decorative and retaining wall with pedestrian cut outs, new stormwater runoff management system, hot spot nourishment, and reconstruction of street accesses, driveways, and entrances. Surf Club Re-Development, Surfside, Florida. Consulting services for the re-development of the 9-acre historic Surf Club property including oversight of the Coastal Construction Control Line Permitting, 100-Year Storm Impact Analysis, review of exterior lighting for the protection of marine turtles; and sand management with beach nourishment. Directly involved in resolving non-compliance issues resulting in a Consent Order detailing the sand removal and replacement activities required by FDEP. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 20 EDUCATION ▪ M.Sc. Oceanography, Florida State University ▪ B.A. Environmental Studies, University of Southern California ▪ B.Sc. Biology, University of Southern California CERTIFICATIONS ▪ Flood Plain Manager ▪ Professional Wetland Scientist ▪ LEED Accredited Professional BD&C ▪ Waterfront Edge Design Guidelines PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ Florida Association of Environmental Professionals, Tallahassee Area Chapter Board Member ▪ Florida Floodplain Managers Association ▪ Association of State Floodplain Managers ▪ Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association ▪ Society of Wetland Scientists Anne E. Laird Marine Science & Environmental Permitting EXPERIENCE Nearshore Hardbottom and Coral Surveys offshore Hillsboro Beach, Hillsboro Beach, Florida. Supporting scientist for monitoring of nearshore hard bottom and coral communities, including coral health assessment surveys, offshore Hillsboro Beach, Florida prior to, during, and following beach restoration and offshore dredging activities. Village of Key Biscayne Seagrass Mitigation and Monitoring Program, Key Biscayne, Florida. Project Manager and Chief Scientist for a large-scale, long-term (7 years) seagrass mitigation and monitoring program for the Village of Key Biscayne, Florida. The program was unique in that the seagrass included mixed species over a wide geographic range and multiple jurisdictional and watershed areas. The program including pre-mitigation mapping, mitigation planning, negotiation with state and local agencies, seagrass transplantation, and monitoring across fixed transects and stations over a period of 7 years. Ultimately 1.33 acres of seagrass including turtle grass (Thalassia testudinum), manatee grass (Syringodium filiforme) and shoal grass (Halodule wrightii) was completed to offset impacts from beach nourishment projects. Lake Worth Inlet Jetty Rehabilitation. Lake Worth, Florida. Provided environmental support for repairs of the north jetty at Lake Worth Inlet. Conducted a benthic survey within the entire project area and wrote a Coral Relocation Plan for review and approval by the USACE and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) for issuance of a Special Activity License (SAL). Relocated coral colonies from the jetty to a pre-approved artificial reef area within proximity to the jetty and performed a post-relocation monitoring survey. Port Everglades Jetty Rehabilitation. Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Performed a benthic survey and developed a Coral Relocation Plan for the relocation of coral colonies from the jetty to a natural hardbottom community off Broward County. Fisher Island Seawall and Mainland Ferry Terminal Surveys. Miami, Florida. Surveyed seawalls and support pilings for the presence of coral and octocoral colonies. Lake Worth Lagoon Seagrass Mapping, Palm Beach County, Florida. Performed the 2020 annual Lake Worth Lagoon (LWL) Fixed Transect Seagrass Monitoring Project along the ten fixed transects throughout the Lagoon in Palm Beach County. Higgs Beach Biological Monitoring, Key West, Florida. Project involves conducting marine biological resource monitoring for the proposed Sand Replenishment Project at Higgs Beach, City of Key West. Currently conducting the pre-construction biological baseline survey in accordance with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)- approved Biological Monitoring Plan and additional monitoring requirements by the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 24 EDUCATION ▪ M.Sc. Marine Environmental Science, Nova Southeastern University ▪ B.Sc. Biological Science, University of Tennessee CERTIFICATIONS ▪ PADI Open Water ▪ SCI Advanced Diver ▪ NOAA Science Diver ▪ IANTD Enriched Air Nitrox Diver ▪ AAUS Compliant Scientific Diver ▪ Certified USCG Safe Boating and Seamanship Skills ▪ American Heart Association Heartsaver Fist Aid CPR AED ▪ DAN Oxygen First Aid for Scuba Diving Injuries PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ America Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS) – Individual Member ▪ Florida Association of Environmental Professionals ▪ Women of WEDA (Western Dredging Association) Christie Hurley, WEDG Environmental Permitting & Marine Science EXPERIENCE Village of Key Biscayne Beach Renourishment Project Seagrass Mapping and Monitoring, Key Biscayne, Florida. Provided Project management, planning, and permitting services, as well as conducted biological surveys for the Village of Key Biscayne related to beach renourishment of 1.1 miles of beach. Conducted resource assessments of the proposed offshore borrow areas, nearshore seagrass edge mapping to facilitate project design, and permitting. Prepared a Project specific Biological Monitoring Plan for agency approval prior to commencement of construction. Conducted Braun Blanquet monitoring along twenty-seven 35-meter-long transects to establish a baseline for evaluation of any unanticipated project related impacts. Prepared Field Observation Reports documenting the findings of the borrow area surveys, nearshore seagrass edge surveys, and Braun Blanquet monitoring data with report submittal to the environmental regulatory agencies. Prepared annual FDEP Local Government Funding Requests each year and coordinated awarded grant funding with FDEP. Bal Harbor Benthic Mapping and EFH Assessment, Haulover Inlet, Florida. Conducted a benthic survey of natural resources of a proposed dredge area and surrounding borrow areas to map the extent, and characterize, benthic habitats present including seagrasses and other potential marine resources of concern (e.g. corals) using novel techniques due to high currents and extensive vessel traffic. Multiple species of seagrass, including the threatened Johnsons’ seagrass (Halophila johnsonii) were identified and mapped. Drafted an EFH Assessment as part of a NEPA-Compliant Environmental Assessment for the project. Village of Bal Harbour Dune Project, Bal Harbour, Florida. Project Manager responsible for developing a Dune Restoration Plan including the addition of 600 cy of additional sand and planting of native vegetation, as well as, securing a FDEP Field Permit for the Bakers Post-Storm Dune Restoration Project for the Village of Bal Harbour. Fisher Island Sand Tightening Project, Miami-Dade County, Florida. Recently completed a seagrass/hardbottom mapping and coral survey/report in support of the upcoming sand tightening project. The Main Beach and Club Beach terminal groins along the eastern portion of Fisher Island are permeable, allowing sand to escape the beach and is affecting beach performance and causing shoaling in the adjacent marina. Edgewater held pre-application meetings and is preparing permit applications and processing them through Miami-Dade County DERM, the FDEP, and the Corps to authorize construction activities. Additionally, we have had discussions with FWC regarding securing a Special Activity License for relocating corals and have negotiated no relocation mitigation to be necessary. Currently working on the Joint Coastal Permit application through the Corps and FDEP and a Class I application through Miami- Dade DERM. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 17 EDUCATION ▪ M.Sc. Biology, Florida Atlantic University ▪ B.A. Anthropology, Minor in Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona CERTIFICATIONS ▪ DAN (First Aid, CPR, AED, & Oxygen) ▪ Florida Master Naturalist ▪ NMFS/MMS Marine Mammal/Protected Species Observer ▪ NITROX ▪ US Power Squadron Piloting ▪ US Power Squadron Safe Boat Operation ▪ PADI Rescue Diver ▪ PADI Advanced Diver ▪ PADI Open Water Diver ▪ Waterfront Edge Design Guidelines PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ America Academy of Underwater Sciences ▪ South Florida Association of Environmental Professionals ▪ Treasure Coast Chapter Florida Association of Environmental Professionals ▪ South East Florida Coral Reef Initiative Francesca Fourney Marine Scientist EXPERIENCE Hillsboro/Deerfield Beach Nourishment Monitoring, Broward County, Florida. Completed biological monitoring associated with the 2015 Hillsboro/Deerfield Beach Nourishment Project. The westernmost edge of nearshore hardbottom habitat was mapped from 0.35 miles north of the Deerfield Beach International Fishing Pier (Pier) to 2.3 miles south of the Pier. Additional data collected included: sediment depth measurements, sediment coverage documentation, video documentation of marine resources, and percent cover of benthic macroinvertebrate and macroalgal communities along previously established shore perpendicular transects in and adjacent to the project area. Completed 2016 Year 1 Post-Construction Survey report and used parametric and non-parametric statistical analyses to examine the relationship between results from the current (2016) and baseline (2014) surveys. Higgs Beach Biological Monitoring, Key West, Florida. Conducted marine resource monitoring for beach nourishment project at Higgs Beach, City of Key West. Survey was conducted in accordance with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) approved Biological Monitoring Plan and additional monitoring requirements by the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Data collected included: sediment depth measurements, sediment coverage documentation, video documentation of marine resources, and percent cover of benthic macroinvertebrate and macroalgal communities along previously established shore perpendicular transects in and adjacent to the project area, and corals measuring greater than 10 cm where tagged. Terminal H (PortMiami) Benthic Survey, Coral Relocation, and Monitoring, Miami, Florida. This project involves coral relocation and monitoring associated with improvements to the PortMiami new cruise Terminal H. Conducted a post reattachment monitoring survey at the offshore relocation site (Gabion Reef), reattached dislodged corals, and prepared results of the project to the client and agencies. Environmental Permitting and Seagrass Survey, Singer Island Bridge Replacement, Riviera Beach, Florida. This project involves replacing six low level residential bridges on Singer Island in Palm Beach Isles. Due to the presence of the federally threatened Johnson’s seagrass (Halophila johnsonii) within the project footprint and potential presence of other listed species, this project requires appropriate permitting. Responsible for preparation of the necessary permits including US Coast Guard Bridge Project Questionnaire, USACE Manatee Biological Evaluation, SFWMD General ERP, and USACE Nationwide Permit application, and RAI responses including preparation of USACE 12-step mitigation plan. Also attended inter-agency pre-application meetings. Conducted updated seagrass surveys. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 5 EDUCATION ▪ M.Sc. Marine Biology, Nova Southeastern University ▪ B.Sc. Marine Biology, Nova Southeastern University CERTIFICATIONS ▪ AAUS Scientific Diver ▪ PADI Divemaster ▪ FL Stormwater Erosion and Sedimentation Control Inspector ▪ EFR, CPR, O2 First Aid ▪ Nitrox Diver & Gas Blender ▪ Visual Scuba Inspector ▪ Florida Master Naturalist ▪ FWC Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ American Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS) ▪ South Florida Association of Environmental Professionals Gina Chiello Environmental Permitting & Marine Science EXPERIENCE Village of Key Biscayne Beach Re-nourishment, Village of Key Biscayne, Florida. Conducted marine resource assessments of the nearshore seagrass habitat using the Braun-Blanquet method to monitor twenty-seven 35-meter-long transects and conducted nearshore seagrass edge mapping, to evaluate any unanticipated project related impacts. Monitoring Reports were prepared, per the project specific permit requirements, documenting the findings of the nearshore seagrass edge surveys and Braun-Blanquet monitoring data. Higgs Beach Sand Replenishment – Reconnaissance Survey, Key West, Florida. Conducted a reconnaissance survey of the project area and immediate vicinity to map out and characterize nearshore benthic habitats, including seagrass and hardbottom communities, using belt-transect and point quadrat methodology, including Braun-Blanquet and BERMR. A report and basemap were prepared to process environmental permits through FDEP and USACE. Coordinated with both the FDEP and FKNMS on the design of the survey and subsequent biological monitoring plan. Bal Harbor Village Benthic Mapping and EFH Assessment, Haulover Inlet, Florida. The USACE is proposing to dredge the Baker’s Haulover Inlet ebb shoal and place the material on adjacent Town of Bal Harbor shoreline. Marine biologist for large-scale habitat mapping and characterization study of seagrass, macroalgae and hardbottom communities to support permitting and NEPA efforts, as well as future monitoring design. Also provided ESA Section 7 consultation support and Essential Fish Habitat Assessment. Hollywood Beach Re-nourishment, Hollywood, Florida. Conducted pre- construction transect installation and biological monitoring including hardbottom mapping, Acropora cervicornis health tracking, and assessment of the nearshore reef using BEAMR, and conducted post construction hardbottom and epifaunal edge surveys. Monitoring reports were prepared per the project specific permit conditions. Hillsboro Beach Re-nourishment, Town of Hillsboro Beach, Florida. Conducted marine and coastal surveys including marine resource investigations, pipeline corridor surveys, hardbottom mapping, Acropora sp. Surveys, in-water sea turtle surveys, weekly escarpment surveys, and year-long shorebird monitoring. Higgs Beach Sand Replenishment – Benthic Survey, Key West, Florida. A marine resource survey was performed along approximately 570 linear feet of shoreline. The purpose of this survey was to document the general extent, species, and density of seagrasses and other potential marine resources of concern (e.g., corals), that may be growing on the submerged substrate within the proposed fill template. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 12 EDUCATION ▪ Graduate Certificate Geographic Information Systems, Florida Atlantic University ▪ B.Sc. Marine Biology, University of West Florida CERTIFICATIONS ▪ NAUI Rescue Diver; PADI Enriched Air Nitrox Diver (IAND/EANx) ▪ American Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS) Scientific Diver Certified, Florida Atlantic University 2013, AAUS Compliant ▪ Florida Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater, Erosion and Sedimentation Control Inspector PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ America Academy of Underwater Sciences ▪ Florida Association of Environmental Professionals, Treasure Coast Chapter, Treasurer ▪ Urban Land Institute ▪ The Environmental and Land Use Law Section of the Florida Bar ▪ Leadership Palm Beach County Rebecah Delp Environmental Permitting & Marine Science EXPERIENCE Higgs Beach Sand Replenishment – Reconnaissance Survey, Key West, Florida. Conducted a reconnaissance survey of the project area and immediate vicinity to map out and characterize nearshore benthic habitats, including seagrass and hardbottom communities, using belt-transect and point quadrat methodology, including Braun-Blanquet and BEAMR. A report and basemap were prepared to process environmental permits through FDEP and USACE. Coordinated with both the FDEP and FKNMS on the design of the survey and subsequent biological monitoring plan. Ongoing pre- and post-construction monitoring will continue for two years. Higgs Beach Sand Replenishment, Pre-construction Baseline Survey – Key West, Florida. Established and tagged permanent transect endpoints to be utilized to establish permanent transect lines that will be used for biological monitoring surveys of pre- and post-construction sand replenishment. Transects were installed in hardbottom and SAV using an underwater drill, stakes, mallets, and underwater epoxy. Pre-construction surveying included habitat edge mapping, transect monitoring, SAV patch delineation and rapid assessment, and coral colony tagging and condition monitoring as outlined in the Biological Monitoring Plan written by FDEP. Bal Harbor Village Benthic Mapping and EFH Assessment, Haulover Inlet, Florida. The USACE is proposing to dredge the Baker’s Haulover Inlet ebb shoal and place the material on adjacent Town of Bal Harbor shoreline. Ms. Delp assisted in conducting a large-scale benthic survey of natural resources of a proposed dredge area and surrounding borrow areas to map the extent, and characterize, benthic habitats present including seagrasses and other potential marine resources of concern (e.g. corals) using novel techniques due to high currents and extensive vessel traffic. Multiple species of seagrass, including the threatened Johnsons’ seagrass (Halophila johnsonii) were identified and mapped. Efforts supported permitting and NEPA efforts, as well as future monitoring design. Peanut Island Flood Shoal, Palm Beach, Florida. The project includes dredging of the flood shoal north of an island located within Lake Worth for the purposed of navigational safety. Ms. Delp assisted in gathering preliminary research including pulling historical aerials and permitting history, reviewing existing biological resource reports, and gathering environmental data within the surrounding Project area to assist with permit application packages. Terminal H (PortMiami) Benthic Survey and Coral Relocation and Monitoring – Miami, Florida. Performed a pre-construction coral and octocoral survey in compliance with the FDEP and the NMFS. Provided results to the FDEP and PortMiami for review. Assisted in conducting a post-reattachment monitoring survey on the relocated corals. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ▪ 2 EDUCATION ▪ M.P.S. Tropical Marine Ecosystem Management, Rosenstiel School for Marina and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami ▪ B.S. Biology, Minor Marine Science, Wittenberg University CERTIFICATIONS ▪ PADI Rescue Diver ▪ Nitrox Diver ▪ American Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS) Scientific Diver Certified ▪ Motorboat Operator Certification (MOCC) PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ▪ America Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS) ▪ Florida Association of Environmental Professionals (FAEP) Question Set 1: Qualifications Question Set 1 Instructions Please use the Response column for short answers to the question asked and the Comment column to provide additional clarification if necessary Some questions have been set to notallow a comment. Those questions will be marked red beside the comment indicating a comment is not allowed. For questions that require long answers, please choose the "See Comment" option and include the longer answer in the Comment field. Queitian Response Comment on. ct n orrnatron What is the name of the individual submitting this Proposal on behalf of your firm? 1 1 2 What is this person's title? 1 1 3 Please provide a contact telephone number: 1 .1.4 Please provide a contact email address: Company Profile 1 2 1 How many years has your company been in business under its current name and ownership? 1 2.2 How many years has your company provided services consistent with those requested in this RFQ? 1.2.3 What is your campanys pnrnary business? 12.4 Type of Company. 1 2 5 Federal Employer Idenuerauon Number (FEIN). 1 2 6 Date registered to conduct business in Florida 1 2 7 Primary Office Lawton: 1.2 .8 Local Office Location (If same as primary, please indicate so): 1 2.9 Will all goods/services be provided out of the local office location? If not, then indicate what other office services will be provided from 1.2.10 Total Number of Employees: Jannek Cederberg, PE President 305-741-6155 jcederberq(oicumminscederbe rg.com 11 11 Coastal & Marine Engineering Corporation 27.2129033 3117/201.0 7550 Red Road, Ste 217 South Miami, Florida 33143 7550 Red Road, Ste 217 South Miami, Florida 33143 Ownership 1 31 Identify all owners or partners of the company (Provide Name, Title, and Percent Ownership): 1 3 2 Is any identified owner an owner of another company? (If yes, identify the name of the owner and the other company name, and the ownership interest) Yes 31 Long Answer Required No Jannek Cederberg, PE, Principal / President- 50% ownership Jason Cummins, PE, Principal / Secretary - 50% ownership Signing Authority The comment must be left blank for this response The comment must be left blank for this response The comment must be left blank for this response Identify all individuals authorized to sign on behalf of the company, indicating 1 4 1 their level of signing authority: (Include name, title, and signing authority Ex All, Cost up to $ Amount, No -Cost, Other) Contract information Identify the five (5) most recent contracts in which your company has provided 1 5.1 services to other public entities Include the entity's name and a contact person. Insurance 1 6 1 Insurance Carrier Name: 162 163 1.64 165 1.6.6 Insurance Carrier Address: Provide the number of insurance claims paid out in the last five years: Prowde the total value of insurance claims paid out in the last five years: Provide insurance representative contact name, telephone, and email address: Please provide employer modcation rating (TAR"). If no EMR, please explain: Long Answer Required Long Answer Required Lassiter Ware 1300 North Westshore Blvd., Ste 110, Tampa FL 33607 ' 0 0 Pelricla L. Schmamallz 813-391-3710 patriciasQlassiterware. com .93 Jannek Cederberg, PE, Principal / President (all cost) Jason Cummins, PE, Principal / Secretary (all cost) 1 City of Marabon - Canoe Solis 2 Miami -Dade County - Angel Trujillo 3 Village of Bal Harbour- John Oldenberg 4 Palm Beach County - Eric Andersen 5 Miarni-Dada County • Joe Garcia 24 Questions 100.00% Complete Question Set 2: Client References Question Set 2 Instructions "Respondent shall provide the information requested for the its verifiable client references as required in the solicitation documents. Respondent may not use the same reference for more than one (1) project/contract and confidential references shall not be included References that are listed as subcontractors in the response will not be accepted as references under this solicitation. Entities having an affiliation with the Respondent (i.e. currently parent, subsidiary having common ownership, having common directors, officers or agents or sharing profits or liabilities) will not be accepted as references under this solicitation References should be available for contact during normal business hours, 9:00 AM — 5:00 PM, Eastern Time The Village will attempt to contact each reference by telephone no less than three times. In the event the contact person indicated cannot be reached following three attempts or is unwilling to provide the requested information, the reference will be considered "unverified" for purposes of this RFP. It is the Proposers responsibility to provide complete and accurate information for each reference, the Village will not correct incorrectly supplied information. No claim of lack of information or error will relieve Respondent of this responsibility The Village reserves the right to contact references other than those identified by the Respondent to obtain additional information regarding past performance. Any information obtained as a result of such contact may be used to determine whether or not the Respondent is a "responsible vendor', as defined in section 287 012(25), Florida Statutes, as may be amended from time to time " Ouautlon Response Comment Client Reference 1 2.1 1 Name of Client Organization: 2 12 Contact Person Name: 2 1 3 Contact Person Te te. 2.1 4 Contact Department 2 1 5 Contact Telephone. 2 1.6 Contact. Email. 2 1.7 Contract Start Date: 2.1 8 Contract End Date: 2,1.9 Contract Value 2.1.10 Is the Contract still active? 2.1.11 Scope of Work (Provide as much detail as possible): 2.2 1 Name of Client Organization - 2 2.2 Contact Person Name. 2,2.3 Coniacl Person Tide 2 2.4 Contact Department 2 2 5 Contact Telephone. City of Marathon Carton Soles Director Public Works drip Engineering 305-289-5008 solisct6t ci. marathon.fl. us 2019 2021 $77,500 No Long Answer Required Village of Bal Harbour John Oldenburg Director Parks and Public Spaces 305-993-7436 Senn design, ventral etruCture design. MIKE21 wave modeie1 . sediment transport, benthic survey, environmental permitting, construction arlrninistratien 22 6 Con taC Email 2 2 7 Contract Start Date: 2.2.8 Contract End Date: 2 2 9 Contract Value: 2.2.10 Is the Contact still active? 2 2 11 Scope of Work (Provide as much detail as possible): pldenburol tbalharbrxrrg.Ocv 2019 2020 $91,000 Yes Long Answer Required The task is not active, but this is part of e multi year continuing service contract FEMA grant coordination, beach design, construction administration for nourishment, drone pre- and post- surveys 2 3 1 Name of Client Organization: 2 32 Contact Person Name: 2 3 3 Contact Person Title: 2.34 - Contact Department 2 3 5 Contact Telephone: 2.3.6 Contact Email: 2 3.7 Contract Start Date: 2.3.8 Contact End Date: 2 3 9 Contract Value: 2.3.10 Is the Contract still active? 2 3.11 Scope of Work (Provide as much detail as possible): USACE/LG2 Environmental Solutions Mark Flowel Senior Project Manager Environmental Resources ' 904-363-1686 F1312(4vAgaWes,coin 2019 2020 $90,000 No Long Answer Required Benthic survey for dredging to be used for beach nourishment, NEPA support, habitat mapping and GIS, ESA Section 7, Essential Fish Habitat 33 Questions 100.00% Complete Question Set 3: Dispute Disclosure Question Set 3 Instructions Answer the questions herein with a Yes or No answer If you answer "Yes°, to any of the questions, explain the context surrounding the dispute, the nature of the dispute, the outcome or status of the dispute, and the monetary amounts, delay, or contract extension involved in the comment If additional explanation is necessary, please upload a separate document with your response under the DD Attachment option You further acknowledge by submitting a response that all statements made in response to these questions are true and agree and understand that any misstatement or misrepresentation or falsification of facts shall be cause for forfeiture of rights for further consideration of your response Has your firm or any of its officers, received a reprimand of any nature or been 3 0 1 suspended by the Department of Professional Regulations or any other regulatory agency or professional associations within the last five (5) years'? Has your firm, or any member of your firm, been declared in default, assessed 3 0.2 liquidated damages, terrninated or removed from a contract or job related to the services your firm provides in the regular course of business within the last five (5) years? No No Has your fine had against it or filed any requests for equitable adjustment, 3.0 3 contract claims, Bid protests, or litigation in the past five (5) years that is No related to the services your firm provides in the regular course of business? Has your firm or any of its officers, been under investigation, charged, or 3.0.4 convicted by any law enforcement agency or public entity for violations of the No law, other than traffic violations? 3 0 5 Has your firm, or any of its principals, failed to qualify as a responsible No Proposer/Bidder on any solicitation in the past five (5) years? response The comment afu5t be left blank for this response The comment must be ten Monk for this response The comment must be left blank for Mrs response The comment must be left blank for taw response The comment must oe telt blank for ins 3 0 6 Has your firm, or any of its principals, declared bankruptcy or reorganized No The comment nisi he leas bier*for mts under Chapter 11? response 6 Questions 100.00! Complete Question Set 4: Key Staff Question Set 4 Instructions Respondent shall answer the following questions for each proposed Key Staff member Include as much relevant detail as possible for each individual. There are question sets for up to 10 Key Staff members, If your company does not intend on proposing 10 Key Staff members, please insert "N/A" into the Response column for question sets in excess of the team being proposed. Question Response Comment Contract Manager 4 1 1 What is the name of the individual that will serve as the Contract Manager ("CM")? 4.1.2 What is the CM's job title? 4.1 .3 How many years of experience does the PM have? Jannek Cederberg, PE Principal, Senior Coastal Engineer 20 years 4,1 .4 How many years of program/project management experience does the PM 20 years have? 4.1.5 How many years has the PM been employed with your company? 11 years 4 1 6 PE69839 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications the PM has: Does the CM have any concurrent commitments to other contracts during the 4 1 7 proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). Yes As a continuing services contract based on task orders, we will have appropriate staff available when a scope of services or notice to proceed is issued Project Manager 4.2 1 What is the name of the individual that will serve as the Program/Project Manager (\"PM1")? 4.2.2 What is the PM's job title? 4.2.3 How many years of experience does the PM have? Jason Cummins PE Principal. Senior Coastal and Engineer 15 years 4 2.4 How many years of program/project management experience does the PM 15 years have? 4.2.5 How many years has the PM been employed with your company? 11 years 4.2.6 PE -71538 4.2.7 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications the. PM has: Does the PM have any concurrent commitments to other contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). Yes As a continuing services contract based on task orders, we will have appropriate staff available when a scope of services or notice to proceed is issued Key Staff Member 1 4.3.1 Please provide this staff member's name: 4.3.2 Please provide this staff members job title: Jordon Cheifet, PE, CFM Senior Coastal Engineer 4 3 3 What role will this staff member fill for this contract? 4.3.4 Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the name of the employer. 4 3 5 How many years of experience does this staff member have? 4,3 6 How many years has this staff member been with the current employer? 4 3 7 Please Ilst any relevant licenses (induding license number) and certifications this staff member has Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other 4.3.8 contractsCuting the proposed term of the contra* being awarded in MIS seF on? It yea. please provide the client name, estimated cons led hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). Key Staff' Member 2 4.4,1 Please provide this staff member's name: 4:42 Please provide this staff members job title: 4.4..3 What role will this staff member fill for this contract? 4.4.4 Is this staff member employed by your company? 8 not, please provide the name of the employer. Coastal Engineering Yes 15 years 1 year PE72876, CFM N/A Leonard Barrera, El Coastal Engineer Coastal Engineering Yes 4 4 5 How many years of experience does this staff member have? 6 years 4.4.6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer? 6 years 4 4 7 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and cerlfications this staff member has: Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other 4.4.8 contracts cluing the proposed term of the Contract being awarded in this solicitation? ff yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). Key Staff Member 3 WA N/A 452 4 5.3 4.5.4 4 5 5 How many years of experience does this staff member have? 4 5.1 Please provide this staff members name: Please provide this staff members job title: What role will this staff member fill for this contract? Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the name of the employer. Danielle H. Irwin Director Regulory Permitting 8 Policy Yes 20 years The comment must be lee blankfor iris retpaKe i comment must be ten bleies for iris response She COmmem nisi be 18(1 pigni for this ;espurtse The comment must be Lott blank for this response The comm response t must be re11 blank far 51 s 4 7.2 473 4.7.4 4.5.6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer? 457 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications this staff member has: Does the ;his staff member ha a any concurrent commitments to other 4 y e contracts during the proposed terra of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated committed hours, and the period of engagement (contract temt). 1.5 years WEDG, CFM, PWS, LEED AP N/A Key Staff Mem bon 4 461 Please provide this staff member's name: A62 Please provide this staff member's job flute: 463 What role will this staff member fill for this contract? Gina Chiello Senior Marine Sdentist Marine Science 8 Environmental Permitting 4.6.4 Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the name of the employer. Yes 465 How many years of experience does this staff member have? 12 years 46.6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer? 4 years N/A 467 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications this staff member has: Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other 4.6.8 contracts during the proposed tens of the contract being awarded in this aalydtatton"" Nr yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term) ri> N/A 4 7 1 Please provide this staff members name: Please provide this staff nrernbees job title: What role will this staff member fill for this contract? Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the name of the employer. Sahar Haddadian, El, PhD Coastal Engineer Coastal Engineering Yes How many years of experience does this staff member have? 1 year 47.6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer? >1 year 477 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications N/A this staff member has: [Inc comment must be let blank for this response The comment mnset be telt Wank for this ret>panse The cornrnerrt Mal be lei rsannk for t}Ns response The commern must be Lett blank for Vas response Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other 4 7_8 contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). r • 'rt3rR. r6 N/A 4.8.1 Please provide this staff member's name: 4.8.2 Please provide this staff member's job title: 4 8.3 What role will this staff member fill for this contract? 4 6 4 Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the name of the employer Colton Mannaning, El Coastal Engineer Coastal Engineering Yes 4 8 5 How many years of experience does this staff member have'? 2 years >1 year N/A 4 8.6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer? 487 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications this staff member has: Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other 4 8 8 contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term) N/A Key Staff Member 7 4 9.1 Please provide this staff member's name: 4.9.2 Please provide this staff member's job title: 4.9.3 What role will this staff member fill for this contract? Christie Hurley, WEDG Senior Marine Scientist Marine Science 8 Environmental Permitting 4 9 4 Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the Yes name of the employer. 4 9 5 How many years of experience does this staff member have? 17 years 4 9 6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer? >1 year 497 WEDG Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications this staff member has: Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other 4 9.8 contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solicitation? If yes, please provide the client name, estimated commited hours, and the period of engagement (contract tern) N/A Key Staff apterrtber 8 4 10 1 Please provide this staff member's name: Anne Laird The comment must be left blank for this response '5 The comment must be left blank for this response The comment must be left blank for this response The comment must be left blank for this response The comment must be left blank for this response 4.102 Please provide this staff members job title: Senior Marine Scientist 4 10 3 What role will this staff member fill for this contract? Marine Science & Environmental Permitting 4.10.4 Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the Yes name of the employer. 4 10 5 How many years of experience does this staff member have? 23 years a 10 6 How many years has this staff member been with their current employer? 1 year 4 10 7 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications N/A this staff member has: Does ttte this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other 4.10.8 contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded in this solecitatibn? If yes please provide the client name estimated oommited hours, and the period of engagement (wmracr tenni NIA Key Staff Member 9 4.11.1 Please provide this staff member's name: 4.11.2 Please provide this staff members Job title: 4 11.3 What role wit this staff member fill for this contract? Rebecah Delp Manse Scientist Marine Science & Environmental Permitting a t 1 s Is this staff member employed by your company? If not, please provide the Yes name of the employer. 4.11 5 How many years of experience does this staff member have? 3 years i 4.11.6 How many years has this staff member been with their anent employer? 3 years 4 11 7 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications N/A this staff member has. Does the this staff member have any concurrent oommitments.to other 4.11.8 contracts during the proposed tens ct the contract being awarded in this solicitation? if yes,. please providethe client name, estimated cominited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). Key Staff hie mbar 10 4.12 .1 Please provide this staff member's name: 4.12.2 Please provide this staff members job title: 4.12.3 What role will this staff member till for this contract? 4.12.4 is this staff member emptbyed by your company? 1f not, please provide the name of the employer.. N/A Francesca Foumey Marine Scientist Marine Science & Environmental Permitting Yes The comment mint be letl plank far Ios response The comment must be le blank fermis hwerse The comment must be Sett blank for thr& response The comment must be tett blank for this I'espbrtse The comment must be blank tar 555 response 4 12 5 How many years of experience does this staff member have? 4 12 6 How many years has this staff member been with bet current employer? 4 12.7 Please list any relevant licenses (including license number) and certifications this staff member has: Does the this staff member have any concurrent commitments to other 4.12.8 contracts during the proposed term of the contract being awarded In this solicitation? liras, please provide the client name, estimated contmited hours, and the period of engagement (contract term). 5 years >1 year N/A N/A 94 Questions 100.00% Complete The comment must be laft tAenk for true response Question Set 5: Proposed Subcontractors Question Subcontractor 1 Response Comment 51.1 512 513 Company Name of Subcontractor: Subcontractor Address: Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment 5 1 4 Subcontractor's license number. u •contractor 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 2.1 Company Name of Subcontractor: 5,2.2 Subcontractor Address: 5.2:3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to beperformed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment 5.2 4 Subcontractor's license number N/A N/A N/A N/A Subcontractor 3 5.3 1 Company Name of Subcontractor: 5.32 Subcontractor Address: 5.3.3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment. 5 3.4 Subcontractors license number: N/A N/A N/A N/A Subcontractor 4 5.4 1 Company Name of Subcontractor 5.4,.2 Subcontractor Address: 5.4 3 Provide the approxmate percentage of thework to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment 5.4 4 Subcontractors license number. N/A N/A N/A N/A Subcontractor 5 5.5 1 Company Name of Subcontractor: 5 5.2 Subcontractor Address: N/A N/A • 5 5 3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment. 5.5.4 Subcontractors license number. N/A N/A Subcontractor 6 5 6.1 Company Name of Subcontractor. 5.62 SubcontractorAddres: 5 6 3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment 5.6 4 Subcontractors rtcense number. N/A WA N/A WA Subcontractor 7 5 7 1 Company Name of Subcontractor 5 72 Subcontractor Address: 5.7 3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment 5.7.4 Subcontractors lCense number. N/A N/A NIA N/A Subcontractor 8 5.8 1 Company Name of Subcontractor: 5.8.2 Subcontractor Address: 5 8 3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment. 5.8.4 Subcontractors license number. N/A N/A N/A N/A Subcontractor 9 Company Name of Subcontractor 5.9.2 Subcontractor Address: 5 9 3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment 5.9.4 Subcontractors §tense number N/A N/A N/A WA Subcontractor 10 5 10 1 Company Name of Subcontractor 5.102 - Subcontractor Address: N/A N/A • 5.10 3 Provide the approximate percentage of the work to be performed by this subcontractor and describe their scope of work in the comment. 5.10.4 Subcontractor's license number. N/A N/A 40 Questions 100.00% Complete EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 14 of 40 1. Definitions 1.1 Additional Services: Those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, which the Consultant shall perform at the Village’s option and when authorized by a Statement of Work(s) issued in accordance with this Agreement. 1.2 Agreement: This written Agreement between the Village and the Consultant, including the Appendices attached hereto and all Amendments and Statements of Work issued by the Village hereunder. 1.3 Allowance: Stated dollar amount(s) may be included in this Agreement for the purpose of funding portions of the Services or the Work. Allowances are included in this Agreement to pay for Additional Services, Reimbursable Expenses, or Inspector General Services. Services paid from Allowances shall be authorized by a Statement of Work prior to commencement of the work under the Statement of Work. 1.4 Amendment: Written modification to this Agreement executed by the Village and Consultant covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement. 1.5 Basic Services: Those services that the Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement as directed and authorized by a Statement of Work(s). Any Services not specifically addressed as Additional Services are considered Basic Services. 1.6 Change Order: A written agreement executed by the Village, the Contractor, and the Contractor’s Surety if necessary, covering modifications to the Contract. 1.7 Constructability: The optimum use of construction knowledge and experience in planning, design, procurement, and field operations to achieve overall Project objectives. 1.8 Construction Cost: Actual cost of the Work established in the Contract Documents, as may be amended from time to time. 1.9 Contract Documents: The legal agreement between the Village and the Contractor for performance of Work. The documents prepared by the Consultant in accordance with the requirements of a Statement of Work(s) issued hereunder that form the basis for which the Village can receive bids for the Work included in the documents. The Contract Documents shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the Invitation to Bid/Request for Proposals, Bid Form, Bid Bond, Surety Performance and Payment Bond, General Conditions, Special Provisions, Technical Specifications, and Plans together with all Addenda, and subsequent Change Orders, and Statements of Work. 1.10 Contractor: The firm, company, corporation, or joint venture contracting with the Village for performance of Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.11 Days: Reference made to Days shall mean consecutive calendar days. 1.12 Defect(s): Refers to any part of the Work that does not follow the Contract Documents, does not meet the requirements of a reference standard, test or inspection specified in the Contract Documents, does not properly function, is broken, damaged or of inferior quality, or is incomplete. The adjective “defective” when it modifies the words “Work” or “work” shall have the same connotation as Defect. EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 15 of 40 1.13 Design Schedule and Cost Management Plan (DSCMP): A progress schedule and earned value measurement plan for the design deliverables that will be developed by the Consultant in accordance with the Project and schedule provided by the Village. The DSCMP shall meet all Project milestones in the Village-provided schedule and shall be approved by the Project Manager. The DSCMP earned value procedures are based upon the agreed weighted percentage values of the deliverables for each phase of Basic Services. 1.14 Direct Salaries: Monies paid at regular intervals to personnel other than principals of the Consultant directly engaged by the Consultant on the Project, as reported to the Director of United States Internal Revenue Service and billed to the Village hereunder on a Multiple of Direct Salaries basis pursuant to a Statement of Work for Additional Services under this Agreement. Personnel directly engaged on the Project by the Consultant may include architects, engineers, designers, and specifications writers engaged or assisting in research, design, production of drawings, specifications and related documents, and other services pertinent to the Project Elements. 1.15 Opinions of Probable Cost (OPC): The latest approved written estimate of Construction Cost to the midpoint of construction broken down by the Division format developed by the Construction Specification Institute (CSI) or unit price bid items, including construction allowance contingencies, submitted to the Village, in a format provided by the Village, in fulfillment of the requirement(s) of this Agreement. 1.16 Plans: The drawings prepared by the Consultant, which show the locations, characters, dimensions, and details of the Work to be done and which are parts of the Contract Documents. 1.17 Program: The initial description of a Project that comprises line drawings, narrative, cost estimates, Project Budget, etc., provided by the Village and furnished to the Consultant. 1.18 Project: Project Elements and components of the Project Elements and Services set forth in this Agreement. 1.19 Project Budget: Estimated cost for the Project, prepared by the Village as part of the Program, including the estimated Construction Cost. The Project Budget may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the Village, at its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or the scope of work. 1.20 Project Element: A part of the Project for which Services are to be provided by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement or by other consultants employed by the Village. 1.21 Project Manager (PM): The individual designated by the Village to represent the Village during the design and construction of the Project. 1.22 Punch List: A running list of defects in the Work as determined by the Consultant with input from the Field Representative and the Project Manager. The initial edition of the Punch List is modified in succeeding editions to reflect corrected and completed work as well as newly observed defects, until the time of Final Acceptance. 1.23 Record Drawings (As-Built Drawings): Reproducible drawings showing the final completed Work as built, including any change to the Work performed by the Contractor pursuant to the Contract Documents, which the Consultant considers significant based on marked-up as-built prints, drawings, and other data furnished by the Contractor. EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 16 of 40 1.24 Reimbursable Expenses: Those expenses delineated in Section 5.11.4, “Reimbursable Expenses” of this Agreement, which are separately approved by the Village that are incurred by the Consultant in the fulfillment of this Agreement and which are to be compensated to the Consultant in addition to the compensation for Basic Services. 1.25 Review Set: A partial or complete set of Contract Documents, provided by the Consultant in accordance with the Statement of Work, at the specified percentage of completion of a phase of the Basic Services as provided for in this Agreement, on which the Village may provide written review comments and acceptance of Services. Any review will be general in nature and shall not constitute a detailed checking of the Consultant’s work nor relieve the Consultant of the responsibility for the completeness and accuracy of its Services. 1.26 Services: All services, work and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. 1.27 Value Analysis (VA): The systematic application of recognized techniques for optimizing both cost and performance in a new or existing facility or to eliminating items that add cost without contributing to required functions. 1.28 Work: All labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, methods, procedures, etc., necessary or convenient to performance by the Contractor of all duties and obligations imposed by the Contract Documents, and representing the basis upon which the total consideration is paid or payable to the Contractor for the performance of such duties and obligations. 1.29 Statement of Work: A written order (consecutively numbered for reference and control purposes) initiated by the Project Manager in accordance with this Agreement, and countersigned by the Village Manager and by the Consultant, directing the Consultant to perform or modify the performance of any portion of the Services. 2. Scope of Services 2.1 Start of Work No Services under this Agreement shall be performed by the Consultant prior to the receipt of an appropriate Statement of Work. Each Statement of Work shall specify the scope of work, time for completion, deliverables, and total compensation for the services authorized. 2.2 Basic Services The Consultant agrees to furnish or cause to be furnished to the extent authorized by a Statement of Work all architectural and engineering professional services, as further specified below, designated as Basic Services, in the phases delineated and described herein unless modified by the Statement of Work, for the design, construction administration, project management, and satisfactory completion of the Project. The Consultant shall be responsible for correction of any errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities as determined by the Project Manager. The Consultant shall furnish sufficient personnel, equipment, and facilities and shall work such hours as necessary to assure such completion. The Consultant may be required to perform all or some of the services presented in this Agreement, depending on the needs of the Village. The Services will be provided on an on-going as needed basis. The Consultant will phase the Work required to complete a Project so that each Project is designed and constructed in the most logical, efficient, and cost-effective manner. EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 17 of 40 Consultant must coordinate with the residents as necessary to review, discuss and resolve the design and any issues that may arise. The Consultant must advise the Village of its plans to coordinate with residents for approval prior to engaging residents. 2.2.1 Submittals The Consultant shall submit to the Village the deliverables listed within an issued Statement of Work in a format approved by the Village. The Village reserves the right to reject all or part of any submittals that are not complete in their content or do not meet the satisfaction of the Project Manager. The Consultant shall be totally responsible for any additional costs resulting, from such rejections and shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. The Consultant shall submit hard and electronic format, as specified herein or otherwise by the Village, copies of all documents required under each Project phase for review, comments, and approval by the Village. The electronic submittal required under this Agreement shall be in a format acceptable to the Village. At the request of the Village, the Consultant shall schedule a review(s) of all plans and documents with the Project Manager at the end of each Project phase, prior to initiating the next phase. 2.2.2 Opinions of Probable Cost The Consultant shall submit Opinions of Probable Cost (OPCs), as described in the Definitions, at the request of the Village. This shall be considered part of the Consultant’s compensation for Basic Services. As part of its OPC, the Consultant shall assist the Village in identifying Project Elements that are eligible for Federal/State grant-in-aid participation. The Consultant shall assist in reviewing applications prepared by the Village and the Project Manager. If meetings with grant agencies are required, attendance at such meetings will be compensated by the Village as Additional Services. The Consultant’s OPC (including construction contingency allowance), broken down by specification sections or unit prices, shall include any adjustments necessary for projected award dates, changes in requirements, or general market conditions. A Statement of Work to proceed with development of Construction Document may not be issued if the OPC, as submitted by the Consultant exceeds the total Village allocated funds for the construction of the Project. No further progress payment shall be made should the OPC in any Project phase exceed the Budget, until an alternate design is provided at no additional compensation, to bring the cost within the Project Budget limitations. Recommendations for reducing the scope of the Project in order to bring the estimated costs within Project Budget limitations, in the event that the OPC exceeds Project Budget limitations, the Consultant must update its documentation, at no additional cost to the Village, to reflect this reduced scope. Any OPC prepared by Consultant represents a reasonable estimate of cost in Consultant’s best judgment as a professional familiar with the local construction industry. 2.2.3 Drawings Throughout all Project phases, all drawings shall be produced electronically using AutoCAD software, which shall be within two (2) years of the latest release. The Consultant must submit all original working drawings in an electronic vector format with an “.dwg” drawing extension. Within the drawing, all external reference files must be bound into one file that represents each of the drawings (hardcopy/prints) in the construction document set. With each submittal, all EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 18 of 40 supporting electronic files, such as images, fonts, and line types, shall be included with the drawings. The Village retains all rights to further use of all electronic drawings as well as blocks, linotypes, layering convention and any other information contained in the electronic drawings that are needed to reproduce the drawings in the construction document set. 2.3 Project Phases 2.3.1 Concept and Data Validation Phase Based on drawings, preliminary budget, and design guidelines provided by the Village, the Village may issue a Statement of Work to Consultant to verify the accuracy and adequacy of all available information for the Project. Such verification shall include, but not be limited to, the following areas: 2.3.1.1 Project Consultant shall examine the information and documents provided by the Village and shall confirm user requirements and determine requirements for additional studies, verify the physical/spatial characteristics of the Project, and the completeness of the information and documents. Consultant may be required to prepare written descriptions of the various options and participate in presentations to multiple groups explaining alternative options. Sufficient detail must be provided to support the presentation materials. If Consultant is requested to participate in presentations, attendance at such meetings will be compensated by the Village as Additional Services. 2.3.1.2 Record Drawings The Consultant shall examine, and verify all as-built conditions as to their completeness and accuracy as depicted on the Record Drawings furnished by the Village 2.3.1.3 Project Budget The Consultant shall examine in detail, the estimated construction costs furnished by the Village. Should this cost verification reveal serious discrepancies and/or deficiencies that would impact the Project and its subsequent stages of development, the Consultant shall inform the Village in writing as to the adequacy of funds required to complete the Project through the construction phase. 2.3.1.4 Surveys The Consultant shall verify the survey information provided by the Village and incorporate such information into the design. The Consultant shall be responsible for obtaining any additional survey information that is required for the completion of the Project and was not provided by the Village. 2.3.1.5 Soils Investigation The Consultant shall prepare a soils investigation plan for use in determining soil characteristics required for proper design of the Project Elements. The plan shall show the number, spacing, and depth of borings required and shall specify such other tests and investigations as may be necessary to provide information prerequisite to the Project’s design. The Consultant shall specify, locate, and coordinate the specific borings and tests to be performed by others and shall interpret the results for application to the Project. EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 19 of 40 2.3.1.6 Discrepancies Between Existing and Depicted Conditions Any discrepancies between the actual, existing conditions and conditions depicted on drawings or other information provided by the Village shall be noted by the Consultant. The actual, existing conditions shall then be incorporated into the Contract Documents. The Village shall be informed, in writing, of any discrepancy between actual and depicted conditions. 2.3.1.7 Deficiencies of Information The Consultant shall inform the Village, in writing, of any deficiencies, other than discrepancies from actual, existing conditions found during verification, in the as-built conditions, utility information, survey information and/or soils investigation which are deemed necessary to provide a satisfactory basis on which to perform the Basic Services. Upon agreement of the deficiencies by the Village, the Village may then issue a Statement of Work directing the Consultant to perform the necessary investigations and develop the required additional information as an Additional Service. At its sole option, the Village may direct a geotechnical engineering company, and independent engineering testing laboratory, a survey company, or other firm(s) under contract with the Village to provide the necessary services for the Consultant. The Consultant shall be responsible for verification of the validity, interpretation, coordination, application, and use of all supplemental information, signed and sealed, provided by any such independent consultant. 2.3.2 Schematic Design Phase Upon written confirmation from the Consultant that all elements of the Project have been identified and the Village’s cost estimates have been verified, the Village may issue a Statement of Work to prepare Schematic Design Documents. The Consultant shall review the verified Project with the Project Manager, other Village representatives as applicable, and all agencies or other governmental authorities having permitting or other approval authority with respect to the Project. If authorized in writing by the Project Manager, Project Elements or components, and suggestions of such agencies regarding required procedures, are to be followed by the Consultant. Necessary inclusions shall be made when preparing the Design Development and Contract Documents. Upon completion of the agencies’ reviews, the Consultant shall detail in writing the recommendations of the agencies to the Village and shall modify the suggested plan as appropriate and resubmit it for Village review, further modification, and for approval and agreement by the Village. As part of this phase, the Consultant shall prepare and submit deliverables including, but not limited to, the following: 2.3.2.1 Site Plan A site plan(s) of the Project, at a scale to be specified by the Village, showing the Project Elements, existing facilities, and proposed projects pertinent to or interfacing with other projects and with the remainder of the Basic Services under this Agreement. 2.3.2.2 Schematic Design Studies The Schematic Design Studies shall consist of all plans, elevations, sections, perspectives, etc., as required to show the scale and relationship of the design concept to surrounding facilities and other Project Elements plus a narrative report, setting forth in appropriate detail, the criteria to be used EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 20 of 40 in preparing the Contract Documents for the Project Elements and identifying all major equipment and systems required, including alternative items as appropriate, and Work Sequencing Schedules. These Schematic Design studies are preliminary in nature and scope. They shall be further defined, and amplifying details shall be developed, by the Consultant during subsequent phases of the Basic Services. The Village will make a determination, based on the Schematic Design studies and narrative report, of what equipment and systems will be used. In addition, the Village will, based on the investigations and recommendations developed by the Consultant, determine which equipment and other items the Village will purchase outside the Contract for this Project. Should the Village decide to purchase equipment and materials separately and furnish them to the Contractor, the Consultant shall, as part of the Basic Services, provide detailed programming and scheduling, perform follow-on liaison with vendors with respect to availability and delivery, and provide any other such Services with respect to such separately purchased and furnished equipment as would otherwise be required had said equipment not been separately purchased and furnished. 2.3.2.3 Drainage The Consultant shall prepare a preliminary drainage plan showing the direction and quantities of flows to each drain. The Schematic Design narrative report shall provide drainage calculations in sufficient details to give assurance that the Project can be used under approved design storm conditions. 2.3.2.4 Barricades, Signing, Marking and Lighting The Consultant shall prepare, as necessary, a preliminary maintenance of traffic plan and construction operations safety plan that show how the Work can be accomplished within operational constraints. It shall delineate the nature, extent, and location of site access, required temporary barricading, signing, marking, and lighting for the Project. 2.3.2.5 Work Sequence and Staging Plan The Consultant shall develop a Work Staging Plan, as requested by the Village, to avoid adverse impacts to residents or Village operations and shall advise the Village, in writing, of any adverse impacts, if any, and estimated increase in Project costs that would result from such staging plan. The Consultant shall develop a Work Sequencing Schedule showing the sequence of construction and the relative time frame within the overall construction period. Alternative plan(s) and associated cost(s) shall also be developed and submitted, along with an analysis by the Consultant of pertinent factors and relative merits of each plan. The Village shall decide which plan to use. 2.3.2.6 Outline Specification The Consultant shall prepare an outline specification that will describe the architectural and engineering requirements, earthwork, utility adjustments and relocations, drainage foundations, mechanical, electrical, utilities, lighting, signalization, signage, markings, external finishes, painting, fire protection systems, plumbing, and other incidental and special equipment being proposed for the Project, all of which will be considerations in the cost estimate. 2.3.2.7 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost The Consultant shall submit an OPC for the Project. The OPC shall include the estimated costs of constructed or acquired facilities and improvements in such detail as required by the Village EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 21 of 40 including each class of equipment, operational systems, and any other direct costs that may be included in the Project by the Village. 2.3.3 Design Development Upon confirmation to proceed from the Village, the Consultant shall prepare Design Development documents from the approved Schematic Design documents. The Design Development documents consist of Drawings, Outline Specifications, Work Sequencing Schedules, and other documents as may be necessary to fix and describe the size and character of the systems and components to be included in the Project. The systems, components, and associated controls shall integrate with and be of like character to those typically found in similar projects unless otherwise specifically approved by the Village in writing. Should the need for additional plans and/or programs become apparent during the course of developing Design Development documents, then such additional plans and programs shall be prepared and included within the Design Development documents. 2.3.3.1 Bid Package Unless otherwise stipulated in a Statement of Work, it is the Village’s intent to bid the Project in one package. The Village, though, reserves the right to direct that a Project be divided into as many contracts as required by operational constraints, adjacent project scheduling, or other reasons as determined by the Village. 2.3.3.2 Value Analysis Upon request by the Village, the Consultant shall conduct a Value Analysis, including life cycle cost analysis and recommendations to maximize value. The Village may request Consultant to present its findings to Village representatives, Village Council, or other stakeholders. 2.3.3.3 Submissions The Consultant shall submit all documents required for the Design Development documents for review and comments by the Village. The Design Development documents shall also include updates to the OPC. These updates shall be based upon the approved size and character of the components of the Project Elements and the incorporation of Village approved recommendations. If the OPC indicates that the Project cost shall be more than the approved OPC in the Schematic Design Phase, then no further progress payment shall be made until an alternate design is provided, at no additional compensation, to bring the OPC within or below the approved OPC in the Schematic Design Phase. The Village may, in its sole discretion, waive this requirement. The Consultant shall not proceed to the Contract Document Phase until all comments have been addressed and the appropriate written approvals have been received from the Village. 2.3.3.4 Exhibits The Consultant shall prepare any exhibits required to convey the intent of the design for presentation to the Village for the Village and any other stakeholders’ review. The Consultant shall resolve all comments, including a follow-up presentation if required. 2.3.3.5 Permitting Review The Consultant shall also, to the extent applicable based on refinements and amplifications effected during the Design Development Phase, review pertinent documents with agencies having permitting or other approval authority with respect to the Project, including those agencies previously consulted in earlier phases, to obtain reviews of such agencies. The Consultant shall EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 22 of 40 report in writing the findings of such reviews and provide recommendations for approval by the Village relative to such findings for implementation by the Consultant. 2.3.4 Contract Documents Upon written direction from the Village, the Consultant shall proceed with the development of Contract Documents from the approved Design Development documents, or other documents provided by the Village. Unless otherwise specified in a Statement of Work, Consultant shall prepare 30%, 75%, and 100%, Contract Documents for review and comment by the Village. 2.3.4.1 30% Contract Documents The Consultant shall submit all documents required under this phase for review and comments by the Village. The 30% Contract Documents submittal shall apply to all applicable disciplines including, but not limited to, architectural, structural, mechanical/HVAC/plumbing/fire protection, electrical, and civil. The 30% Contract Documents submittal shall also include updates to the OPC. If the OPC indicates the cost will be higher than the prior approved OPC, then no further progress payments shall be made until the Consultant provides an alternate design at no additional cost to the Village. The Village may, in its sole discretion, waive this requirement. The Consultant shall not proceed to development of 75% Contract Documents until all comments have been addressed and the appropriate written approvals have been received from the Village. 2.3.4.2 75% Contract Documents Upon approval of the 30% Contract Documents, the Consultant shall prepare 75% Contract Documents. Using the documents prepared under this Article, the Consultant shall submit for review the necessary portions of the Contract Documents to authorities, including, but not limited, County, State, and/or Federal, having jurisdiction over the Project by law or contract with the Village. Said documents shall be sufficient to be permitted as applicable by such authorities. The Consultant shall develop a coordinated plan of execution for this Phase, which will include an outline, or index, of the contents of the Contract Documents along with a schedule(s) for completion. The Consultant shall prepare Plans in a manner that will ensure clarity of line work, notes and dimensions when reduced to 50% of the original size. After acceptance by the Village, the Plans shall become part of the Contract Documents. The Technical Specifications shall provide that a system of quality control and quality assurance be a requirement of the work. The quality control and quality assurance system shall provide procedures to be used by the Contractor and the Consultant to assure the quality of all materials, equipment systems, and furnishings function as intended and are equal to or better than called for in the specifications. The Consultant shall submit all documents required under this phase for review and comments by the Village. The 75% Contract Documents submittal shall apply to all applicable disciplines including, but not limited to, architectural, structural, mechanical/HVAC/plumbing/fire protection, electrical, and civil. The 75% Contract Documents submittal shall also include updates to the OPC. If the OPC indicates the cost will be higher than the prior approved OPC, then no further progress payments shall be made until the Consultant provides an alternate design at no additional cost to the Village. The Village may, in its sole discretion, waive this requirement. The Consultant shall not proceed to development of 100% Contract Documents until all comments have been addressed and the appropriate written approvals have been received from the Village. EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 23 of 40 2.3.4.3 100% Contract Documents Upon approval of the 75% Contract Documents, the Consultant shall prepare 100% Contract Documents. The Consultant shall submit all documents required under this phase for review and comments by the Village. The 100% Contract Documents submittal shall apply to all applicable disciplines including, but not limited to, architectural, structural, mechanical/HVAC/plumbing/fire protection, electrical, and civil. The 100% Contract Documents submittal shall also include updates to the OPC. If the OPC indicates the cost will be higher than the prior approved OPC, then no further progress payments shall be made until the Consultant provides an alternate design at no additional cost to the Village. The Village may, in its sole discretion, waive this requirement. The Consultant shall not proceed to development of Bid Documents until all comments have been addressed and the appropriate written approvals have been received from the Village. 2.3.5 Bidding and Award of Contracts After review by the Village of the 100% Contract Documents, the Consultant shall respond to all comments in writing within seven (7) calendar days after receipt of the comments from the Village, acknowledging acceptance of the comments that will be incorporated into the documents during the Bidding and Award of Contracts phase and identifying the rejection of comments not to be incorporated as approved by the Village. The Consultant shall assemble and submit a consolidated set of 100% Contract Documents for back-check by the Village. This set will reflect the revisions required after the 100% review by the Village. The Consultant shall recommend and justify to the Village the overall Project Contract Time, Phasing, Interim Completion Time(s), the amounts of liquidated damages, and any allowances to be incorporated into the Contract Documents. Upon request from the Village, the Consultant shall assist the Village in obtaining bids, responding in writing to Bidders’ inquiries, preparation of addenda, evaluation of Bids and Bidders, and awarding of a Contract(s) for all or a portion of the Work that was bid pursuant to the Contract Documents. The Consultant shall also attend and participate in pre-bid conferences and/or bid openings upon request by the Village. If the lowest responsive Base Bid for a Project exceeds the total authorized construction budget provided to the Consultant, as may be modified from time to time prior to soliciting bids, by 10% or more, then the Village may direct the Consultant to revise the scope of construction to bring the OPC within the total authorized construction budget at no additional cost to the Village. 2.3.6 Construction Administration Upon receipt of a Statement of Work for Construction Administration Services, the Consultant shall provide the Services as set forth herein. The Construction Administration Services shall commence upon receipt of the Statement of Work and end when the final request for payment from the Contractor has been approved by the Village, the Consultant has submitted its Report of Contract Completion, the As-Built Drawings have been received by the Village, and all other Services required, including warranty-related services, has been completed. EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 24 of 40 2.3.6.1 Field Visits and Observations Reports The Consultant shall approve the overall progress schedule, schedule of shop drawings submissions, schedule of values, and other schedules required of the Contractor under the Contract Documents. The Consultant shall visit the Work at least once per week, unless otherwise stated in the Statement of Work, evaluate the work for compliance with the Contract Documents, prepare and submit to the Village a detailed written and sequentially numbered report of the observed conditions of the Work, the progress of the Work, and other Work observations, as found or made during each visit to the Work. Such report shall be submitted to the Village at least monthly, unless otherwise stated in the Statement of Work, or more frequently on an interim basis if necessary to prevent or mitigate any increase in Project costs or damages to the Village. The Consultant will not be held responsible for the means, method, techniques, sequences or procedures used, or for safety precautions and programs, in connection with the Work performed by the Contractor, but shall immediately report to the Village any observations of conditions, which in his/her judgment would endanger persons or property or which might result in liabilities to the Village. 2.3.6.2 Certificates for Payment The Consultant shall review and certify the amounts due the Contractor and issue Certificates for Payment in such amounts. The Consultant’s certification for payment shall constitute a representation to the Village, based on the Consultant’s evaluation of the Work and on the data comprising the Contractor’s Application for Payment, that the Work has progressed to the point indicated and that, to the best of the Consultant’s knowledge, information, and belief, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents. The foregoing representations are subject to minor deviations from the contract documents correctable prior to completion and to specific qualifications indicated by the Consultant. Such certification shall be based on the Consultant’s review and acceptance of the following, nonexclusive list: 1. An evaluation of the Work for conformance with the Contract Documents; 2. The verification of the Contractor’s measurements for work satisfactorily completed; 3. The results of any subsequent test required by the Contract Documents; 4. The review of as-built drawings to determine completeness and accuracy up to the date of the pay request; 5. Any specific qualifications stated in the request for payment; and 6. The confirmation of the cost of labor, materials, and equipment for cost-plus work including disputed work. 2.3.6.3 Review of Claims The Consultant shall assist the Project Manager and other Village personnel or consultants in reviewing and evaluating all Contractor’s claims relating to the cost, execution, and progress of the Work and on all other matters or questions related thereto, including, but not limited to, any change orders, Statements of Work, and potential Statements of Work. 2.3.6.4 Special Inspections The Consultant shall have authority to require special inspection or testing of any Work questioned as to conformity with the Contract Documents whether or not such Work has been fabricated and delivered to the Project, or installed and completed. EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 25 of 40 2.3.6.5 Review of Shop Drawings and As-Builts The Consultant shall promptly review and approve shop drawings, samples, and other submissions of the Contractor(s) for conformance with the design concept of the Project Element(s) and for compliance with the information given in the Contract Documents. The Consultant shall render decisions, issue interpretations, and issue correction orders within the times specified in the Contract Documents or, absent such specification, on such timely basis so as not to delay the progress of Work as depicted in the approved construction schedule. Should the Consultant fail to perform these services within the time frames specified in the Contract Documents or, if no time frames are specified, in a timely manner so that such failure causes a delay in the progress of the Work, the Consultant shall be liable for any damages to the Village resulting from such delay including, but not limited to, damages related to delays and inefficiencies incurred by the Contractor for which the Village may be responsible. 2.3.6.6 Revisions to Contract Documents The Consultant shall revise Plans, specifications and other Contract Documents as necessary, shall review Change Orders, Statements of Work, and other appropriate documentation prepared by the Project Manager, and shall assist the Project Manager and Village in negotiations with the Contractor(s) with respect to all changes in the Work. If the need to revise Plans, specifications and other Contract Documents and/or to review Change Orders, Statements of Work, and other documentation is a result directly or indirectly of errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Services rendered by the Consultant, including Sub-consultants, then such work shall be provided by the Consultant at no additional cost to the Village. 2.3.6.7 Substantial Completion and Final Acceptance The Consultant shall, prior to Substantial Completion of the Work, inspect the Work with the Project Manager, to determine initial Punch List items and to ensure that all Work has been commissioned in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. The Consultant shall re-inspect the work with the Project Manager as many times thereafter as is needed to establish a time of Substantial Completion. The Consultant shall review each edition of the Punch List before it is issued by the Project Manager. The Punch List shall record defects observed in the Work and incomplete commissioning in first and succeeding visits, and defects corrected (recorded by striking items from the punch list or by identifying items as corrected). a. Contractor’s Closeout Submittals and Actions The Consultant shall review the Project Manager’s record of closeout submittals and actions for concurrence. b. Determination of Substantial Completion When the Punch List has been reduced to the point at which, in the judgment of the Consultant and Project Manager, the Work can be immediately utilized for its intended purpose, division of responsibility for carryover items from the Contractor to Village has been set forth, and all Punch List items are judged to be capable of completion in not more than 60 days or such other time as may be otherwise approved by the Village, upon recommendation of the Project Manager, the Consultant shall review, concur, and upon approval by the Village, set the date of Substantial Completion. EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 26 of 40 c. Certificate of Occupancy If a Certificate of Occupancy is required on the Project, the Consultant and Project Manager shall not certify the Work as substantially complete until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued in accordance with the Florida Building Code. d. Determination That the Work is Not Substantially Complete If the required submittals and actions by the Contractor are deficient, or if in the judgment of the Project Manager the Work will not be ready for final acceptance within the time parameters specified herein, the Consultant shall notify the Project Manager, the Village, and the Contractor in writing that Substantial Completion cannot be declared, and include a list of deficient Contractor’s submittals, deficient Contractor’s actions, defective or incomplete items in the Work, and any other supporting reasons the Project Manager and/or the Consultant may wish to state.\ e. Retainage for Uncompleted Work The Consultant shall review and concur with the Project Manager’s recommendation of an amount to be held as retainage that will ensure that the Village can employ other contractors to complete each item of work in the event of the Contractor’s failure to complete. Upon approval by the Village, this retainage for uncompleted work shall be deducted from the retainage amount otherwise due the Contractor at the time of Substantial Completion. Retainage for uncompleted work will not be paid until the Contractor completes all uncompleted items. f. Final Acceptance When in the judgment of the Project Manager and the Consultant the Work is complete, the date of Final Acceptance shall be set by the Village. g. Post-Final Acceptance The Consultant shall furnish to the Village at the Consultant’s expense a final, complete, and fully updated record set of documents. The record drawings shall be submitted in the following formats: • Two (2) sets of 30” x 42” Electrostatic black line prints; and • Two (2) sets of electronic drawings: o Based on submission date, the .dwg version must be within two years of the AutoCad version currently available. Transmission may be through CD, DVD, or external hard drive. The complete set of Record Drawings shall include all pertinent shop drawings as well as the Plans included in the Contract Documents as adjusted to comply with the as-built Work. The Consultant shall verify that all Record Drawings prepared by the Contractor are prepared in a manner that will ensure clarity of line work, notes, and dimensions. The Consultant shall provide a certification of the quality of all equipment and systems that are part of the finished work. The Consultant shall furnish to the Village in an electronic database (Microsoft Excel 2000 or later) an index, summary, and copies of all warranty documents required to be furnished by Contractor under the consolidated Contract Documents. The Project Manager and Contractor will be responsible for providing an index and summary list of equipment by serial number and indicate for each the warranties, the term, conditions, and the purported legal enforcement and recourse EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 27 of 40 rights of the Village as indicated by the language in the Warranty. This list shall be reviewed by the Consultant. The Consultant shall inspect the entire Project thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the warranties. The Consultant shall report its findings to the Village sufficiently prior to the end of the warranty period to enable the Village to issue an action report to the Contractor prior to expiration of the warranty period. The Consultant’s report shall be complete with specific recommendations covering any portion of the Work to be repaired or replaced. In addition to the requirements set forth above, the Consultant shall perform those duties of the Consultant as set forth in the Contract Documents. 2.3.7 Meetings and Reports 2.3.7.1 Meetings As part of providing the Basic Services, the Consultant shall attend all meetings wherein information relating to the Basic Services is discussed, and shall provide consultation to the Village regarding such information. These meetings shall include, but shall not necessarily be limited to, regularly scheduled meetings concerning design coordination, and such other meetings, whether regularly scheduled or specially called, as may be necessary to enable the Consultant to coordinate his/her Services with, and provide information to and/or obtain information from, the Village, its consultants and contractors, and all others with whom coordination or liaison must take place in order to fulfill the intent and purposes of this Agreement and the Contract Documents. Unless otherwise directed by the Village, the Consultant shall prepare and disseminate in a timely manner meeting notices and agenda, briefing materials, meeting minutes, meeting reports, etc., appropriate to such meetings. 2.3.7.2 Reports In addition to any specific reports called for elsewhere in this Agreement, the Consultant shall submit to the Village a monthly progress report of the status and/or results of all Services required to be performed under this Agreement. This Report shall be submitted with the invoice for Services performed during the corresponding period. Each report shall include but not be limited to: a brief narrative the progress made during the previous month and the estimated incremental and total percentages of each assigned Project Element that have been completed; any problem(s) encountered during the month and any actions taken to solve or alleviate the problem(s); any changes which may have occurred in the projected dates of the events; a statement from the Consultant as to each Project Element that the Project is either on schedule or the Project Element is not on schedule and should the latter be stated, then the Consultant shall also state the length of delay and the reasons for the delay. The Consultant shall explicitly state recommendations for alleviating the delay and in subsequent monthly progress reports state whether or not the delay has been alleviated. Such report shall also relate the aggregate services performed to the total compensation paid and payable to the Consultant hereunder for each Phase of the Basic Service as set forth in the corresponding invoice for payment. 2.4 Statement of Work When the Village has determined that a specific phase of a Project or a Project is to proceed, the Village will request the Consultant prepare a Statement of Work Proposal on a form provided by the Village. The Village will provide a preliminary scope of work for the Consultant to base its EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 28 of 40 Statement of Work Proposal from, and the Village and Consultant may have preliminary meetings to further define the Scope of Services and to resolve any questions. The Statement of Work Proposal must include the proposed Scope of Services, total time for performance, time for per of each task, phase or deliverable, staffing, including proposed hours per individual and/or classification, proposed fees, Subconsultants, and deliverable items and/or documents. The Village may accept, reject, or negotiate revisions to the Statement of Work Proposal. Upon conclusion of negotiations, the Consultant may be required to submit a final, revised Statement of Work Proposal. Upon approval of the Statement of Work Proposal, the Village Manger will issue an executed Statement of Work for the Project. The Village reserves the right to terminate negotiations and not issue a Statement of Work to Consultant. Request for a Statement of Work Proposal shall not be construed as a guarantee of work. It is understood that a Statement of Work may be issued under this Agreement at the sole discretion of the Village, and that the Consultant has no expectation, entitlement, right to or privilege to receive a Statement of Work for any Project or task. The Village reserves at all times the right to perform any or all Professional Services in-house, or with other private professional architects or engineers as provided by Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, as amended, (Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act) or to discontinue or withdraw any or all Projects or tasks or to exercise any other choice allowed by law. 3. Additional Services 3.1 General Services categorized below as “Additional Services” may be specified and authorized by Village and are normally considered to be beyond the scope of the Basic Services. Additional Services must be authorized in a Statement of Work and will be compensated for as provided in Section 5, Compensation & Payments. Examples Except as may be specified in this Agreement, Additional Services may include, but are not limited to the following: Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by Village. Specialty Design: Any additional special professional services not included in the Scope of Services. Extended Testing & Training: Extended assistance beyond that provided under Basic Services for the initial start-up, testing, adjusting and balancing of any equipment or system; extended training of Village’s personnel in operation and maintenance of equipment and systems, and consultation during such training; and preparation of operating and maintenance manuals, other than those provided by the Contractor, subcontractor, or equipment manufacturer. Provide Commissioning Services as part of systems start-up. Major Revisions: Making major revisions to drawings and specifications resulting in or from a change in Scope of Work, when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by Village and are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 29 of 40 (Major revisions are defined as those changing the Scope of Work and arrangement of spaces and/or scheme and/or any significant portion thereof). Expert Witness: Preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any arbitration proceeding or legal proceeding, providing, however, that Consultant cannot testify against Village in any proceeding during the course of this Agreement. Miscellaneous: Any other services not otherwise included in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in accordance with generally accepted engineering practice related to construction. 3.2 Additional Design The Village may, at its option, elect to proceed with additional design work, which shall be handled in accordance with the requirement for Additional Services. 3.3 Project Management The Village may request the Consultant to act as Project Manager for Projects not designed by the Consultant. In such circumstances the Service will be compensated as an Additional Service. Project Management Services shall be conducted in accordance with the following provisions: 3.3.1 General Project Manager shall coordinate, attend, conduct, record, and assist the Village at all Project meetings. Project Manager shall direct the Consultant (Project Engineer or Architect) or Contractor to prepare meeting minutes. In the absence of meeting minutes prepared by others, Project Manager will provide the Village with minutes from such meetings. Project Manager shall review for accuracy the minutes of such meetings prepared by either the Consultant, Contractor, or others. Project Manager shall clarify, amend and report any discrepancies affecting the Project. Project Manager, in general, shall coordinate all Project matters. The Project Manager shall develop and continuously update a Master Schedule (for each Project). This shall include: • All development, design and construction activities conducted by: o Consultant(s) o Village (Staff, Council, or other Village representatives) o Project Manager o Additional third-party consultants (if any) o Contractor(s) • All activities required for o Agency interface, reviews, and approvals o Additional consultant selection o Project development o Planning, design, bidding, construction, and occupancy Project Manager shall also prepare 30-day look-ahead task schedules for each project and on a continuous basis. 3.3.1.1 Roles and Responsibilities Matrix Project Manager shall develop a comprehensive roles and responsibility matrix (for each Project). This matrix shall define all tasks related to the activities above (for each project) and clearly define EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 30 of 40 who is responsible, who is to be informed/consulted and who has approval authority. This matrix will be updated each time a role changes or a task is added. Throughout Project development, Project Manager shall utilize the roles and responsibility matrix to identify any third-party resources required. Should an additional resource be required, the Project Manager shall define their scope of work and recommend a method of procurement (in accordance with Village requirements) for Village approval. Project Manager shall then develop specifications and coordinate with Village Procurement staff to draft any RFQ’s/RFP’s required for selection and facilitate the Village’s solicitation, evaluation, selection and contracting of successful parties. 3.3.1.2 Reports Project Manager shall furnish to the Village reports containing: (a) the status of each Project; (b) a comparison of the Project budget to costs incurred through the date of the report; (c) a comparison of the Project schedule to the work actually completed through the date of the report; (d) any revision to the Project schedule or Project Budget made during the period covered by the report; (e) a summary of change orders made during the period covered by the report; (f) a list of all pending change orders and all outstanding issues requiring action or approval by Village; (g) the status of any governmental requirements and activities required to facilitate approval of the Project; and (h) any other reports concerning the Project as Village may reasonably request. 3.3.1.3 Financial Oversight Project Manager shall provide financial oversight services for each Project, including but not limited to (a) preparing budgets; (b) preparing monthly variance reports; (c) monthly Project payment application processing related to assembling, reviewing and forwarding to Village for payment the invoices from the Consultant and Contractor and other consultants; and (d) processing and coordinating the payment for applications for payment. Project Manager shall provide such reports in an electronic format in a form acceptable to Village. 3.3.2 Construction Phase Services Project Manager shall provide continuous onsite management services, including being responsible for the coordination of all construction activity, including recommending various alternative courses of action when construction contractors are not performing work in accordance with the contract documents. Project Manager shall conduct weekly onsite coordination meetings and daily quality control. Project Manager shall coordinate with the Contractors for site access control. 3.3.2.1 Pre-construction meeting Project Manager shall conduct a general pre-construction meeting prior to the start of construction and in-depth pre-construction meetings with all major trade contractors prior to the start of their work activities. 3.3.2.2 Village Representation Project Manager shall represent the Village in its communications with the Consultant(s) and Contractor(s); schedule, attend, and conduct progress meetings, regular on-site meetings to review construction progress and pay requests and to provide appropriate recommendations to the Village concerning the Village’s decisions on construction matters, including, where necessary, alternative EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 31 of 40 designs or materials; and coordinate, review and advise the Village concerning, change orders, submittals, and requests for information. 3.3.2.3 Review of Change Orders, Schedules, Budgets, and Applications for Payment Project Manager shall: (i) assist and review the processing of change orders, (ii) advise Village concerning the necessity for, scope of and recommended cost of change orders, and (iii) negotiate, on Village’s behalf, all change orders with Contractor for Village approval. The final Project Budget and/or Project Schedule, as applicable, will be revised to reflect approved change orders. Project Manager shall review applications for payment by Consultant(s) and Contractor, review and certify certificates for payment issued by Consultant(s) and make written recommendations to Village concerning payment. Project Manager’s certification for payment shall constitute a representation to the Village that, to the best of the Project Manager’s knowledge, information, and belief, the work has progressed to the point indicated and the quality of the work is in accordance with the Contract Documents. The issuance of a certificate for payment shall further constitute a representation that the Contractor or Consultant is entitled to payment in the amount certified. In conjunction with the Contractor who has prime contractual responsibility, the Project Manager shall additionally review and advise the Village concerning the adequacy of the Contractor’s personnel and equipment, and the availability of materials and supplies to meet the Contractor’s schedules in relation to the Project Schedule. Project Manager shall direct prime Contractor(s) (and others, where appropriate) to prepare and update a critical path schedule for completion of the applicable work. In the event of delays impacting the critical path schedule, Project Manager shall make recommendations to Village for corrective action by Contractor and review Contractor’s recommendations for corrective action. Project Manager shall advise the Village concerning the procurement of materials by Contractor regarding budget and schedule implications. 3.3.2.4 Review and Approval of Shop Drawings and Product Data Project Manager shall coordinate Consultant review and approval of shop drawings, product data and other submittals by a Contractor. Project Manager shall obtain from Contractor record drawings or, if required by the applicable Project construction contract, As-Built drawings, as construction completes. 3.3.2.5 Contract Enforcement Project Manager shall enforce each Contractor’s contract to maintain a daily log containing the number of workers, equipment, work accomplished, daily weather, problems encountered and other relevant data as the Village may require. Although Project Manager shall not guarantee the performance by Contractor, Project Manager shall recommend courses of action to the Village when Village or Project Manager becomes aware that requirements of any Project Contract Documents are not being fulfilled, or when Contractor falls behind in its schedule; shall communicate recommendations, as directed by the Village, to Contractor on behalf of the Village; shall monitor Contractor's performance of such recommendations; and shall report Contractor's progress to the Village on at least a monthly basis. EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 32 of 40 3.3.2.6 Nonconforming Work Project Manager shall notify the Village in writing, with photos and supporting documentation, if Project Manager becomes aware that the work of Contractor is not being performed in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. As appropriate, Project Manager shall, with written authorization from the Village, require additional inspection or testing of the work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents, whether or not such work is covered, installed or completed. Project Manager shall review any and all test reports and notify the Village, the Consultant and the Contractor, as appropriate, of deficiencies in the work of which Project Manager becomes aware and shall advise the Village of projected consequences of such default and shall make recommendations to Village with respect thereto. With the written authorization of Village, Project Manager shall reject work which does not conform to the requirements of the applicable Contract Documents. 3.3.2.7 Substantial Completion and Final Acceptance Project Manager shall attend on-site review of each Project to confirm substantial and final completion of the construction of the Project, and notify Village when Project Manager believes the work under a Project construction contract is substantially complete and that a Punch List should be prepared. Project Manager shall coordinate with the Consultant in its review of the work to enable the Consultant to determine the date of Substantial Completion. At the Substantial Completion by Contractor of the work, Project Manager shall monitor the Consultant in its inspection of the work and preparation of a detailed Punch List specifying any items which require completion, installation, correction or repair. Project Manager will consult with Village and/or Consultant(s) in connection with recommendations for the rejection and replacement of all nonconforming work, as appropriate. Project Manager shall complete the final close-out of each Project by: (i) obtaining, or causing the Contractor to obtain, all government approvals required for the legal use and occupancy of the Project, (ii) obtaining all warranties, guarantees, bonds, insurance certificates, installation manuals, and other items required pursuant to the Project construction contracts, (iii) obtaining all affidavits, waivers, and releases the Contractors are required to provide pursuant to the Project construction contracts to achieve final completion of the Project, (iv) analyzing all claims (including change order disputes and other claims for extra compensation) asserted by the Contractors and the Consultants, (v) collecting and/or otherwise resolving any and all back charge claims that Village may assert against any Consultant or Contractors, including assistance with any legal proceedings instituted by Village and/or any Consultant or Contractor, and/or (vi) representing Village at meetings and/or inspections scheduled by Village and held to resolve problems relating to design, physical condition or operation of the Project to seek enforcement of warranties. 3.3.2.8 Testing and Start-up Together with the Consultant and Village, Project Manager shall monitor and observe the testing and start-up of all utilities, systems and equipment for a Project and review test reports. EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 33 of 40 3.3.2.9 Safety and Security While performing the Work, the Project Manager shall promptly inform the Village if the Project Manager becomes aware of any security concerns and/or unsafe conditions. 4. Reimbursable Expenses 4.1 General Reimbursable Expenses cover those services and items authorized by Village in addition to the Basic and Additional Services and consist of actual, direct expenditures made by Consultant and the Subconsultant for the purposes listed below. Transportation, travel and per diem expenses within Dade, Broward, or Palm Beach Counties must not be considered as reimbursable expenses under this Agreement. Additional Reimbursable Expenses include, but are not limited to: Communications Expenses: Identifiable communication expenses approved by the Project Manager, long distance telephone, courier and express mail between Consultant’s various permanent offices and Subconsultant. Consultant’s field office at the Project site is not considered a permanent office. Reproduction, Photography: Cost of printing, reproduction or photography, beyond that which is required by or of Consultant’s part of the work, set forth in this Agreement. Surveys: Site surveys and special purpose surveys costs authorized by the Village. Geotechnical Investigation: Identifiable Soil Borings and Reports and testing costs authorized by the Village. Fees: All permit fees, review fees and other similar fees paid to regulatory agencies for approvals directly attributable to the Project. 4.2 Subconsultant Reimbursables Reimbursable Subconsultant expenses are limited to the items described above when the Subconsultant‘s agreement provides for reimbursable expenses and when such agreement has been previously approved, in writing, by the Village Manager and subject to all budgetary limitations of the Village and requirements of this Agreement. 5. Compensation and Payments 5.1 Method of Compensation The fees for Professional Services for the Project and each Statement of Work must be determined by one of the following methods or a combination thereof, at the option of the Village Manager or designee, with the consent of the Consultant. A Lump Sum, which may include not to exceed components in accordance with Section 5.4.1 below. An Hourly Rate, in accordance with Section 5.4.2 below and at the rates set forth in the Agreement. A Percentage of Construction Cost, in accordance with Section 5.4.3 below. EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 34 of 40 A Statement of Work for Additional services will be determined by one of the following methods or a combination thereof, at the option of the Village Manager or designee, with the agreement of the Consultant. 1. A Lump Sum, which may include not to exceed components in accordance with 5.4.1 below. 2. An Hourly Rate, in accordance with 5.4.2 below and at the rates set forth in the Agreement. 5.2 Consultant Not To Exceed Absent an amendment to the Agreement or to any specific Statement of Work, any maximum dollar or percentage amounts stated for compensation must not be exceeded. In the event they are so exceeded, the Village must have no liability or responsibility for paying any amount of such excess, which will be at Consultant’s own cost and expense. 5.3 Wage Rates 5.3.1 Fee Basis All fees and compensation payable under this Agreement must be formulated and based upon the certified negotiated Wage Rates stated in Exhibit C of the Agreement. Said Wage Rates are the effective direct hourly rates, as approved by the Village, of Consultant and Subconsultant employees in the specified professions and job categories that are to be utilized to provide the services under this Agreement, regardless of manner of compensation. Should the Consultant intend to utilize personnel or Subconsultants for a Project where the Wage Rates have not been established, the Consultant must request that the Village add the person or Subconsultant’s wage rates to Exhibit C. The Village may require that the Consultant provide documentation substantiating the request. 5.3.2 Employees and Job Classifications Form SC identifies the professions, job categories and/or employees expected to be used during the term of this Agreement. These may include engineers, landscape architects, professional interns, designers, CADD technicians, project managers, GIS and environmental specialists, specification writers, clerical/administrative support, and others engaged in the Work. In determining compensation for a given Scope of Work, the Village reserves the right to recommend the use of Consultant employees at particular Wage Rate levels. Consultant must not include any profession, job category or employees in a Statement of Work Proposal that do not appear on Form SC. Consultant must submit a request to the Village to add such to Form SC prior to the submittal of any affected Statement of Work Proposal. 5.3.3 Multiplier For Work assigned under this Agreement, a maximum multiplier of 2.9 for home office and 2.4 for field must apply to Consultant’s hourly Wage Rates in calculating compensation payable by the Village. Should the Consultant have an approved multiplier with the State of Florida or Miami Dade County, the Village may elect to utilize either of these multipliers should they be less than above stipulated rates. Said multiplier is intended to cover Consultant’s employee benefits (e.g. sick leave, vacation, holiday, unemployment taxes, retirement, medical, insurance and unemployment benefits) and Consultant’s profit, and overhead including, without limitation, office rent, local telephone and utility charges, office and drafting supplies, depreciation of EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 35 of 40 equipment, professional dues, subscriptions, stenographic, administrative and clerical support, management and supervisory responsibilities, time or travel and subsistence not directly related to a Project. The multiplier must not be applied to the Principal, owner, or partner of the Consultant except where they are preparing drawings or specifications, preparing a study report, or similar tasks. 5.3.4 Calculation Said Wage Rates are to be utilized by Consultant in calculating compensation payable for a Statement of Work Proposals requested by Village. Consultant must identify job classifications, available staff and projected man-hours required for the proper completion of tasks and/or groups of tasks, milestones and deliverables identified in a request for a Statement of Work Proposal. 5.3.5 Wage Rate Adjustments The Consultant may request an adjustment to the Wage Rates on an annual basis. Such request may only be made where there has been an actual increase in a Wage Rate(s) by the Consultant. The Village may also adjust the or where the Village Manager determines that extenuation circumstances exist. The maximum the Wage Rates depicted in Exhibit C may be adjusted at the Consultant’s request must be based on the Miami – Fort Lauderdale Consumer Price Index issued by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Such adjustment must be calculated by multiplying the ratio of the index in effect at that time divided by the previous year’s index by the hourly rate entries in the Wage Rate Schedule to determine the adjusted Wage Rate Schedule. In no event must the Wage Rate increase by more than three percent (3%) in any one year period. 5.4 Computation of Fees and Compensation The Village agrees to pay the Consultant, and the Consultant agrees to accept for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, fees computed by one or a combination of the methods outlined above, as applicable, in the following manner: 5.4.1 Lump Sum Compensation for a Scope of Work will typically be a Lump Sum, either a Fixed Fee or Not to Exceed Fee as deemed appropriate by the Village, to be mutually agreed upon in writing by the Village and the Consultant and stated in a Statement of Work. Lump Sum, and Lump Sum not to Exceed methods of compensation are the preferred methods of compensation. The Lump Sum or Lump Sum not to Exceed will be calculated utilizing the Wage Rates established in Exhibit C. Such Fee(s) will be subject to validation by the Village and the Village may request additional information to substantiate the Fee(s). Lump Sum Fixed Fee: must be the total amount of compensation to be paid to the Consultant for the Services performed on a specific Project, or phase or task under a Statement of Work. Payments to the Consultant must be based on a percentage of completion basis. Lump Sum Not to Exceed Fee must establish the maximum amount of compensation to be paid to the Consultant for the Services performed on a specific Project, or phase, or task under a Statement of Work. Payments to the Consultant must be based on the actual work effort required to complete the Project, phase or task. Guaranteed Maximum Lump Sum: must be the total maximum fee amount payable by Village wherein certain aspects, tasks or allowances may not be defined, quantified and EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 36 of 40 calculated at the time of a Statement of Work issuance. A Guaranteed Maximum Lump Sum compensation may represent a combination of Fixed Fees for professional services and not to exceed allowances for Reimbursable Expenses or Additional Services. Lump Sum Fee Adjustment: Where the Village authorizes a substantial or material change in the Scope of Work, the Lump Sum Base Fee may be equitably adjusted by mutually consent of the parties, which must be reflected in an amendment to the Statement of Work. Lump Sum Fees must be calculated by Consultant utilizing the Wage Rates established in Exhibit C of the Agreement. 5.4.2 Hourly Rate Fees Hourly Rate Fees must be those rates for Consultant and Subconsultant employees identified in Exhibit C, Wage Rates. All hourly rate fees will include a maximum not to exceed figure, inclusive of all costs expressed in the contract documents. The Village shall have no liability for any fee, cost or expense above this figure. Hourly Rate Fees shall be used only in those instances where the parties agree that it is not possible to determine, define, quantify and/or calculate the complete nature, and/or aspects, tasks, man- hours, or milestones for a particular Project or portion thereof at the time of a Statement of Work issuance. In such cases, the Village will establish an Allowance in the Statement of Work that must serve as a Not to Exceed Fee for the Work to be performed on an Hourly Rate Basis. Consultant must maintain records acceptable to the Village to track the hours of work performed by each person. 5.4.3 Percentage of Construction Cost This is a percentage fee based on the Project Budget as mutually agreed upon in writing by the Village and the Consultant and stated in a Statement of Work or Notice to Proceed 5.5 Reimbursable Expenses Any fees for authorized reimbursable expenses must not include charges for any expenses identified in Section 5.3.3, Multiplier. All reimbursable services must be billed to the Village at direct cost expended by the Consultant. Village authorized reproductions in excess of sets required at each phase of the Work will be a Reimbursable Expense. The Village will reimburse the Consultant for authorized Reimbursable Expenses pursuant to the limitations of this Agreement as verified by supporting documentation deemed appropriate by Village Manager or designee including, without limitation, detailed bills, itemized invoices and/or copies of cancelled checks. 5.6 Fees for Additive or Deductive Alternates The design of additive and deductive alternates contemplated as part of the original Scope for a Project as authorized by the Village Manager will be considered as part of Basic Services. The design of additive and deductive alternates that are beyond the original Scope of Work and construction budget must be authorized through a Statement of Work and must be billed to Village as Additional Services. The fees for alternates will be calculated by one of the three methods outlined above, as mutually agreed by the Village Manager and the Consultant. EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 37 of 40 5.7 Fees for Additional Services The Consultant may be authorized to perform Additional Services for which additional compensation and/or Reimbursable Expenses, as defined in this Agreement. Determination of Fee The compensation for such services will be one of the methods described herein: mutually agreed upon Lump Sum; Hourly Rate with a Not to Exceed Limit, or Percentage of Construction Cost. 5.8 Procedure and Compliance An independent and detailed Statement of Work or an Amendment to a previously issued Statement of Work must be required to be issued and signed by the Village Manager for each additional service requested by the Village. The Statement of Work will specify the fee for such service and upper limit of the fee, which must not be exceeded, and must comply with the Village’s regulations, including the Purchasing Ordinance, the Consultant’s Competitive Negotiation Act, and other applicable laws. 5.9 Payment Exclusions Consultant must not be compensated by Village for revisions and/or modifications to drawings and specifications, for extended construction administration, or for other work when such work is due to errors or omissions of Consultant as determined by Village. 5.10 Fees Resulting From Project Suspension If a Project is suspended for the convenience of the Village for more than three (3) months or terminated without any cause in whole or in part, during any Phase, the Consultant must be paid for services duly authorized, performed prior to such suspension or termination, together with the cost of authorized reimbursable services and expenses then due, and all appropriate, applicable, and documented expenses resulting from such suspension or termination. If the Project is resumed after having been suspended for more than three months, the Consultant’s further compensation must be subject to renegotiations. 5.11 Payments to the Consultant 5.11.1 Payments Generally Payments for Basic Services may be requested monthly in proportion to Services performed during each Phase of the Work. Subconsultant fees and Reimbursable Expenses must be billed to the Village in the actual amount paid by Consultant. Consultant must utilize the Village standard Consultant Invoice Form that will be provided to the Consultant. Payment will be made in accordance with Florida Statute Chapter 218, Part VII, Local Government Prompt Payment Act, after receipt of Consultant’s invoice, after receipt of Consultant’s invoice, which must be accompanied by sufficient supporting documentation and contain sufficient detail, to allow a proper audit of expenditures, should Village require one to be performed. If Consultant is entitled to reimbursement of travel expenses, then all bills for travel expenses must be submitted in accordance with Section 112.061, Florida Statutes. Consultant must submit all requests for payment using the Village’s standard Consultant Invoice form. EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 38 of 40 5.11.2 For Comprehensive Basic Services For those Projects and Statements of Work contain multiple phases or task, payments must not exceed the amount stipulated for each phase and the aggregate payment must not exceed the total value of the Statement of Work 5.11.3 Billing – Hourly Rate Invoices submitted by Consultant must be sufficiently detailed and accompanied by supporting documentation to allow for proper audit of expenditures. When Services are authorized on an Hourly Rate basis, the Consultant must submit for approval by the Village Manager, a duly certified invoice, giving names, classification, salary rate per hour, hours worked and total charge for all personnel directly engaged on a Project, phase or task. , Reimbursable Services Cost should then be added to the sum for the total charges for the personnel. The Consultant must attach to the invoice all supporting data for payments made to and incurred by Subconsultants engaged on the Project. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant must, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving an update on the completion of the Project and/or the applicable phase or task. 5.11.4 Reimbursable Expenses 1. General Reimbursable Expenses are those items authorized by the Village outside of or in addition to the Scope of Work as identified in the Statement of Work (as Basic Services and/or Additional Services) and consist of actual expenditures made by the Consultant and the Consultant’s Subconsultants for the following: 2. Transportation: Identifiable transportation expenses in connection with the Project, subject to Section 112.061, Florida Statutes, as amended, excluding, however, all, general automobile transportation expenses within Miami- Dade, and Broward counties. Transportation expenses to locations outside the Miami-Dade-Broward-Palm Beach County area or from locations outside the Miami-Dade-Broward area will not be reimbursed unless specifically pre-authorized in writing by the Village Manager. 3. Travel and Per Diem: Identifiable per diem, meals and lodging, lodging, taxi fares and miscellaneous travel-connected expenses for Consultant’s personnel are subject to Section 112.061 Florida Statutes as amended. Meals for class C travel inside Miami-Dade or Broward County will not be reimbursed. Meals and lodging expenses will not be reimbursed for temporarily relocating Consultant’s employees from one of Consultant’s offices to another office if the employee is relocated for more than five (5) consecutive working days. Lodging will be reimbursed only for room rates equivalent to Holiday Inn, Howard Johnson or Ramada Inn. Governmental lodging or meals will not be reimbursed that result from travel within Miami-Dade, Broward or Palm Beach Counties. Travel and per diem expenses are subject to the prior approval of the Village Manager. 4. Communication Expenses: Identifiable communication expenses approved, in writing and in advance by the Village Manager, including long distance telephone, courier and express mail between the Consultant’s various permanent offices. The Consultant’s field office at the Project site is not considered a permanent office. Express mail or courier services are to be used only where there are significant time constraints. 5. Reproduction, Photography: EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 39 of 40 Cost of printing, reproduction or photography, which is required by or of Consultant to deliver services, set forth in this Agreement. 6. Permit Fees: All Permit fees paid to regulatory agencies for approvals directly attributable to the Project. These permit fees do not include those permits required to be paid by the construction Contractor. 7. Reimbursements to Subconsultants: Reimbursable Subconsultant expenses are limited to the items described above when the Subconsultant agreement provides for reimbursable expenses and when such agreement has been previously approved in writing by the Village Manager and subject to all budgetary limitations of the Village and requirements of this Agreement. EXHIBIT “C” RATE SCHEDULE Contract No. 2021-08-14 Page 40 of 40 Title Hourly Rate Contract Manager/Principal $205.00 Architect N/A CADD/Computer Technician $75.00 Chief Designer N/A Designer $75.00 Graphic Designer $88.00 Inspector/Engineer Intern $69.00 Landscape Architect N/A Landscape Architect Intern N/A Landscape Designer/Landscape Planner N/A Landscape Inspector N/A Planner N/A Project Engineer $150.00 Project Architect N/A Project Landscape Architect N/A Project Manager $160.00 Project Planner N/A Secretary/Clerical $65.00 Senior Architect N/A Senior Inspector/Senior Engineer Intern $84.00 Senior Landscape Architect N/A Senior Landscape Inspector N/A Senior Planner N/A Senior Project Engineer $175.00 Name of the Firm:____Cummins Cederberg, Inc. _______ Village of Key Biscayne Continuing Architectural & Engineering Services CUMMINS CEDERBERG, INC.‐ 2