HomeMy Public PortalAbout2023-57 Authorizing to apply for a matching hazard mitigation assistance grant from the Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA for a Stormwater Pump StationRE S O L U T I O N N O . 2 0 2 3 -5 7
A RE S O L U T I O N O F T H E V IL L A G E C O UN C I L O F T H E
V I L L A G E O F KE Y B I S C A Y N E , F L O RI D A , A U T H O RI Z IN G
T H E V I L L A G E M A N A G E R T O A P P L Y F O R A M A T C H IN G
H A Z A RD M I T I G A T I O N A S S I S T A N C E G RA N T F R O M T H E
F E D E RA L E M E R G E N C Y M A N A G E M E N T A G E N C Y
(F E M A ) T O O B T A I N F U N D IN G F O R A S T O RM W A T E R
P U M P S T A T I O N A T H A RB O R P A RK ; A N D P R O V ID I N G
F O R A N E F F E C T IV E D A T E .
W H E RE A S , pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance
Act, the Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA"), through the Florida Division of
Emergency Management (FDEM), may award municipalities grants under the Hazard Mitigation
Grant Program (the "Grant") to fu nd eligible hazard mitigation measures following a major
disaster declaration; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Key Biscayne ("Village") desires to apply for a matching Grant
from FEM A to fun d for a storm water pump station at Harbor Park as part of the Zone 1 K-8 Integrated
Storm water Improvement Project (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, if awarded a Grant for the Project, the Village will be required to provide a
25% match based on total Project costs; and
WHEREAS, the Village Council supports the Village's application, attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" (the "Application"), for a Grant from FEMA to fund the Project and desires to
authorize the Village Manager to submit the Application for the Grant; and
WHEREAS, the Village Council finds that this Resolution is in the best interest and
welfare of the residents of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE
VILLAGE OF KEY BISCAYNE, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Page I of2
Section 1. Recitals. That each of the above-stated recitals are hereby adopted,
confirmed, and incorporated herein.
Section 2. Authorization. That the Village Council hereby authorizes the Village
Manager to submit the Application, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A," to
FEMA for a Grant to fund the Project.
Section 3.
adoption.
Effective Date. That this Resolution shall be effective immediately upon
PASSED and ADOPTED this 10th day of ..:O=ct=o=be=r _, 2023.
ATTEST:
Qw .Q~~({oc,t---,, JOCEYNB.KH
VILLAGE CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICI
~J~
WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN COLE & BIERMAN, P.L.
VILLAGE ATTORNEY
Page 2 of2
E X H IB IT A
FEM A- __ -D R -FL
Support Docum ents
D C o n fo rm s w / S ta te 4 0 9 P lan
D In D e c la re d A rea
D S ta te w id e
THIS SECTION FOR STATE USE ONLY
D S tanda rd H M G P D 5% Initiative A pplication
D Initia l S ubm iss io n or
Eligible A pplicant
D S tate or L ocal G ove rn m e nt
D P riv ate No n-P rofit (T ax ID R ece iv ed)
D R e cognized India n Tribe or Tribal O rga n izatio n
C o m m u n ity N F IP S ta tu s : (Check all that apply)
D P a rt ic ip atin g C o m m u nity ID #: _
D In G o o d S ta n d in g D N on-P a rt ic ipating D C R S
S tate A p p li c a tio n ID :
LM S R anking :
C o unty :
D A pplicatio n C o m p lete
D Re- Sub m issio n
Project Type(s)
0 W ind
0 Flood
D O ther:
T his ap p licatio n is fo r all F e d e ra l E m e rgency M anagem ent A ge ncy (FE M A Regio n IV ) Hazard M itigation G rant Pro gram (H M G P )
pro po sa ls. C o m p le te A L L se ctio n s and provide the docum ents req ue sted . If yo u req uire technical assistance, contact the Florida
D ivisio n of E m e rge n cy M an a ge m ent at D E M _H azardM itiga tio nG rantP rogram @ em .m y lo rida.co m .
Section I - Applicant
A. Ap plicant Instruction: Complete all sections that correspond with the type of proposed project
Application Sections I-IV:
Environm ental R eview :
Any Applications in olvirig public property, public ownership, or management
of property -------------- Ao« u is it ion, Elevation, Dry Flood Proofing, Drainage Improvements, Flood
Controf Measures, Floodplain and Stream Restoration, and Flood Diversion
- one w orksheet per. structure ------------,----- Permanent, portable generators, and permanent emergency standby pumps
--------------,,---'-,--,-~
New Safe Room, Retrofit of existing structure, Community Safe Room,
Residential Safe Room _______________ .,.,.
New Safe Room, Retrofit of existing structure -----~---~------ ind Retrofit projects only - one worksheet per structure
Detensiote Space, Hazardous Fuels Reduction, Ignition Resistant
Construction, other
Aquifers, other -------------- Upgrades to sewer systems, upgrading electrical components for a utility,
undergrounding electrical systems, etc.
--------'-,---..r.._---r'---
R e quest for Public A ssist~nce FEMA Form 90-49 (Request for Public Assistance): All applicants must
Form : complete, if applicable. ---------~---- A c qui sit ion Form s: If project type is Acquisition, these forms must be completed.
(Only one of the tw o Notice of Voluntary Interest forms is necessary.)
Model Statem ent of Assurances for Pro perty Acquisition Projects
Declaration and Release
Notice of Voluntary Interest (Town Hall Version)
Notice of Voluntary Interest (Single Site Version)
Statem ent of Voluntary Participation
FEMA M odel Deed Restriction Language -------------- A II applicants are recommended to complete this checklist and utilize the
guidance for completing the application.
1
Maintenance Agreem ent:
Flood Control - D rainage
Imp rovem ent Worksheet:
Drought Worksheet:
Application Com p leteness
Guidance I C hecklist :
27P-22-.007 F.A.C FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020)
B. Applicant Information:
FEMA-4680-DR-FL DISASTER NAME: Nicole
Title of Project: K-8 Basin Long Term Flood Mitigation
1. Applicant (Organization): Village of Key Biscayne
2. Applicant Type: 1:2] State or Local Government D Native American Tribe D Private Non-Profit D Special District
3. County: Miami-Dade
4. State Legislative Senate District(s): 37; State Legislative House District(s): FL-112;
Congressional House District(s): FL-27
5. Federal Tax I.D. Number: 300239421
6. Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS): 618258227
7. Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Code*: 086 (*if your: Ff PS code i$ not known, see guidance)
8. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community ldentlftcation-Nurnber: 120648
(this number can be obtained from the FIRM map for your area)
9. Point of Contact: (Applicant staff serving as the coordinator of project)
i:2]Ms. !Mr. First Name: Colleen --------~
Title: Capital Program and Grants Manager
Address: 88 W. McIntyre St, Suite 250
City: Key Biscayne
Telephone: 305 365 8948
10. Application Prepared by:
State: FL Zip Code: _3_3_1_4_9 _
cblank@keybiscayne.fl.gov
Colleen Last Name: Blank ------------
Title:
Address:
City: Key Biscayne
Telephone:
Organization:
11. Authorized Applicant Agent (proof of autl10rization authority required)
FL Zip Code: _3_3_1_4_9 _
cblank@keybiscayne.fl.gov
!Ms. i:2]Mr. First Name: Steven .---------
Title: Village Manager
Address: 88 W. McIntyre Street
City: Key Biscayne
Telephone: 306 366 6514
Signature-'-: ___,,-------,,----,----------------
Date: ----,--~-~--::,---
12. Local Mitigation Strateg~ (LMS) Compliance
a. All proposed projects must be included in the county's Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) Project List, and on file
with FDEM's Mitigation Bureau Planning Unit. Does your jurisdiction have a current FEMA Approved
Mitigation Plan and this project is listed? 1:2] Yes D No
b. Attached is a letter of endorsement for this project from the county's LMS Coordinator. 1:2] Yes D No
Ensure the LMS endorsement letter contains both the Total Estimated Projects Cost (Section IV. D.), along
with the Estimated Federal Share (Section IV. 1.1.) allocated to this project.
Last Name: Williamson
State: FL Zip Code: _3_3_1_4_9 _
Email: jrasco@keybiscayne.fl.gov
c. The LMS project list and endorsement letter both have an estimated cost column and Federal Share amount
that is within $500.00 between the two. D Yes 1:2] No
13. Has this project been submitted under a previous disaster event? 0 No
D Yes, provide the disaster number and project number (as applicable): __
2
27P-22-.007 F.A.C FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020)
Section 11- Project Description
A . H a za rd s to b e M itig a te d / L e v e l o f P ro te c tio n
1. S e le ct th e type of haza rds the pro posed pro je ct w ill m itigate :
cgJ F lo od D W ind D Sto rm surge D W ildfire cgJ O ther (list): High Tide Flooding, Infrastructure Failure,
S vere Storm , C oastal A Flood
2. Id e n tify the type of propose d pro je ct:
D E le vatio n and retrofitt ing of resid e ntia l or no n-residentia l structure
D A cquisitio n and R e locatio n D A cquisitio n and D e m olitio n
D W ind retro fit cgJ D ra inage proje ct tha t red uces loca lized flo od ing
D G e ne rato r D O the r (expla in) __
3. Li st the total num be r of pe rso ns that w ill be protected by the propo se d proje ct (include im m ediate population
affected by the project only):
2896 = 1746 (485 single fam ily dw elli ngs X 3.6 Flo rida average household size)+ 1150 (Students and staff
at the K-8 School LUC 522)
4. Li st ho w m a ny acres of "T ota l Im pacted A rea" is to be protect ed by the proposed proje ct
affected by the project only):
17
5. Fill in th e le ve l of protectio n and the m ag nitude of event the propo se d proje ct w ill m itig ate. (e.g . 23 structures
p ro tected ag ainst the 10 0-yea r storm even t (1% ch an ce)
485 stru cture(s) pro tected ag a inst the 10 -yea r storm event (10, 25 , 50, 10 0 , or 50 0 yea r storm even t)
__ structure(s) protected aga inst __ m ile pe r hour (m p h) w ind s
6. C he ck all ite m (s) the project m ay im p act:
D W e tla nds D W ate r Q ua lity
cgJ F lo odp la in cgJ C o asta l Zo ne
D H istoric R e so urce s D Fishe ries
D V egetatio n R em o val Cl P ub lic C o ntrove rsy
cgJ H e alth & Safety D O the r __
D Previously U ndisturbe d Soil
~ T oxic or H aza rdo us S ubstances
D T hreate ned & Endange red Species
cgJ Potential fo r C um u lative Im pacts
7. E ng ineered p rojects: /f y Q ur pro ject ha s bee n already desig ne d and eng inee ring inform atio n is available, att ach
to yo ur applicatio n ALL: calculatio ns, H&H study and de sig n pla ns (e .g. D rainage Im prove m e nt, Erosion C ontrol,
or o the r specia l proje ct type s). 0 No cgJ Y es If so , see A tt achm ent #(s) Enqinee ring-H &H Study an D esign Plans
-O ne drive 1 5 9-202 3 .zip.
B.
D e scrib e , in d e ta il, the existing pro ble m , the pro posed project, and the scope of w o rk. Exp lain how the proposed
proje ct w ill solve the proble m (s) and provide the level($) of protection de scribed in Pa rt A . A lso, if availa ble, att ach a
ven do r's estim ate and/or a co ntra cto r's bid fo r the scope of w o rk. Ensure that each proposed project is m itigation
and not m aintenance.
3
27 P -22-.0 07 F .A.C F D E M Fo rm N o . H M G P A p p licatio n (0 1-2 0 20 ) (E ff. 01-20 2 0)
1. D escribe the existing problem s:
The Village of Key Biscayne currently relies on drainage wells, and gravity outfalls for the discharge of stormwater.
As sea level rises and storms increase in occurrence and severity as a result of climate change, the capacity to
discharge into Biscayne Bay and absorption into the groundwater system is diminishing. The topography of the
Village ranges from 1.5 feet NAVO to 8.0 feet NAVO with the lowest catch basin at 1.48 feet NAVO. The current
astronomical high tide elevation is 1.61 feet NAVO with sea level potentially rising to 2.35 feet NAVO by 2050. Low
areas within the Village will experience more frequent flooding and increased tidally influenced flooding as the
hydraulic connection between the mean sea level and the drainage zone is reduced in the future.
Sea level rise poses an existential threat to the Village of Key Biscayne, and without action, by 2070, every part of the
Village will experience tidal flooding. Many areas will be permanently inundated without action. The largest asset at
risk of flooding are the Village's roadways. Without any adaptative measures taken by 2070, the Village can expect
large amounts of flooding in their roadways even on days with little to no precipitatibn. Due to their low elevations,
proximity to the ocean, and low groundwater capacity, this outlook is typical for many of Florida's barrier islands. In
this way, the Village is not alone in its risks. However, due to the single roadway access to the Village and one
North/South arterial roadway, there are unique challenges.
There are 1,504 properties in Key Biscayne that have greater than a 26% chance of being se erely affected by flooding
over the next 30 years. This represents 99% of all properties in Key Biscayne. In addition to damage to properties,
flooding can also cut off access to utilities, emergency services, tr,ansportation, and may impact.the overall economic
well-being of an area. Overall, Key Biscayne has an extreme risk of flooding over the next 30 years, which means
flooding is likely to impact day-to-day life within the community. This is based on the level of risk the properties face
rather than the proportion of properties with risk.
The K-8 Basin is one of the most severely flooded areas during storm events. Roadways are impassable and flood
waters threaten life, safety, and property. Emergency vehicles cannot safely pass through the several feet of water
that accumulates in the roadways and residents cannot access services or leave their homes safely.
While sea level rise presents a gradually increasing problem, stronger storm and hurricanes produce severe effects
on an already over-capacity stormwater system.
4
27 P -2 2-.0 0 7 F.A.C FDEM Form No. HM G P Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020)
2. Describe the type(s) of protection that the proposed project will provide:
The K-8 Basin Project includes stormwater trenching, resizing pipes and storm drains, and the construction of a
pump station. This will increase the capacity of the stormwater system, enable the Village to lessen local damages
from flood events, and reduce the potential cascading impacts associated with nuisance flooding that will
progressively impact the Village as sea level rise becomes more relevant over the next 50 years. The K-8 Basin
Project is designed to a 10-year, 24-hour storm with a total rainfall of 8 inches in the project area. This will mitigate
many currently disruptive events such as king tides, severe rainfall events, and tidal flooding during coastal storm
events. Flooding will be reduced for 500 at-risk structures, including 14 repetitive loss structures that have an overall
claim history payout of $2,142,164 over the last 23 years.
The protection level designed into this project will also mitigate anticipated SLR into 2070. By 2070 (NOAA 2017
intermediate low curve), the Village can expect 0.75 feet of high tide flooding. High tide flooding, sometimes
commonly referred to as nuisance or sunny day flooding, can interrupt the Village's ability to travel, respond to
emergencies, and reduces its ability to discharge stormwater even in circumstances with no precipitation. The 0.75
feet of high tide flooding documented under the NO A A 2017 intermediate low curve is consistent with design storm
of the proposed improvement project.
The K-8 Basin Project area boarders the Village center where 11 commercial business, the Village Hall and Police
Department, the Village Fire/Rescue Department, the Village Chamber of CommerceNisitor Center and the Village K-8
School are located and are at risk to SLR flooding under the 2040'aild 2070 scenarios. The K-8 Basin Project will
protect these property owners, businesses and Village critical faciliti~s from the financial harclship resulting from
repeated flooding in the future.
The K-8 Basin Project will aid in eliminating roadway flooding, closures and detours allowing residents and
emergency personnel to enter/exit adjacent neighborhoods, and Village center during heavy rainfall events and high
tide events. With the improvement in place roadways will remain unflooded for more days. reducing traffic delays for
emergency responders, residents and visitors alike.
By 2070 the Village can expect over 0.75 feet of high tide flooding. High tide flooding, under this scenario will
permanently inundate the K-8 Basin project area. According to NOA A, "the U.S. Southeast Atlantic and Gulf Coast
regions saw an increase of over 400 to 1,100 percent, respectively, in high tide flooding days compared to the year
2000." Consequently, the increase over the next fi~ )6ears, presented in the Qualitative Hazard Assessment
Methodology and Results study (see attachments) are consistent with projections from NO AA. These flooding
projections further reveal that improvements considered for the K-8 Basin will be necessary and can be one of the
most beneficial ada tation strate ies from~ comm uni safe and resilienc ers ective.
5
27P-22-.007 FAC FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020)
3. Scope of Work (describe in detail what you are planning to do):
Note: The funds received from this HMGP grant will go to the construction of the K-8 Basin Project only. All planning
and design will be completed before FEMA funds are awarded. The technical support that is provided as part of this
application is part of the planning and design of the flood mitigation measures for the K-8 Basin project.
The Village of Key Biscayne completed a stormwater improvement project, which included the installation of
backflow preventer devices on all outfalls. Backflow devices prevent daily tidal fluctuations from entering the
Village's stormwater system, but when coastal storm events occur in a high tide situation, the system's ability to
discharge is diminished until the tide drops. As water levels in Biscayne Bay and groundwater elevations increase,
these types of gravity drainage systems and conventional best management practices will not function or provide the
level of service that are anticipated in 2040 and 2070.
Sea level rise is likely to increase flooding during high tides and storm surge events that will supersede the
protection levels of the backflow preventer devices impacting low lying areas of the/village. The ability to drain
standing water after rainfall events and elevated ground water will also be reduced with elevated sea levels by
limiting stormwater discharge through the existing gravity operated systems .. As an increase in tidal elevation
continues through sea level rise the need for a more robust drainage network will be evident.
To evaluate the Village's existing discharge capacity, the existing gravity system was xamined to determine the
maximum flow at certain conditions. The recommendation put forwarcl in>the Scope of Services for the K - 8 School
Design and Permitting, July 2022 will be carried through design oMhe K-8 Basin stormwater. drainage improvements.
The results will provide the hydraulic design calculations for the proposed drainage system, pump station, and
dissipator structures. These calculations will be incorporated into the Final Drainage Report and will be submitted to
relevant regulatory agencies as a part of the permit applications before construction is funded. Additional street
improvements will include green infrastructure and traffic calming and wiil be designed to the Village's level of
service requirements.
The K-8 Basin project includes expanding the capacity of the stormwater, system in the K-8 basin with a new pump
station located in Harbor Park. The pump station will be accompanied by expanded stormwater pipe sizes, and
additional and larger outfalls to accommodate the increase in the amount of stormwater that will enter the pump
system. This pump station is necessary to move water off Village roadways which will allow emergency vehicles to
access properties. This pump station will increase the drainage capacity_of this basin by 233.9 cfs. The total
discharge capacity of the existing system is 13.3 and the capacity reguired'to keep the center of the roads from
flooding and for the edges of the rights of way to drain within 12 hours is 247.2 cfs. These improvements are for
emergency vehicles to access resldences during storm events and for residents to access services and be able to
safely leave their homes. The,K-8 Basin project will enable the Village to lessen local damages resulting from flood
events and reduce the potential cascading impacts associated with nuisance flooding that will progressively impact
the village as sea level riSll (SLR) becomes more relevant over the next 50 years. . /.
4. Describe any other on- oinq-or proposed projects in the area that may impact, positively or negatively, the
proposed HMGP Project:
The Florida Power ana b.ight (FPL) Company is planning to underground utilities within the K-8 Basin Project area.
Extents of the undergrounding project are W. Heather Drive to the north, W. Enid Drive to the south, Harbor Drive to
the west, and i=ernwood Drive to the Eas·t. Excavation of areas in the K-8 Basin Project right of way will be integrated
and closely coordinated with FP,L durfng design stages of the project and established before HMGP funds are
awarded. Close coordination wih FPL over the past year has ensured that planning and design of the K-8 Basin will
be im'pacted by the undergrounding project but will be designed in conjunction with the K-8 basin project. The vlllage
intends on continued coordination with FPL through the completion of their project and the K-8 Basin project.
6
27P-22-.007 FAC FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020)
Section Ill - Project Location (Fully describe the location of the pro posed project.)
A . S ite
1. D escribe the physica l lo catio n of this proje ct, includ ing street nu m bers (o r neig hbo rho ods) and proje ct site zip
code (s). Provide precise lo ng itude and latitude coordinates for the site utilizing a hand -held global positioning
syste m (G P S ) un it or the equiva le nt:
S ite L ocatio n: K-8 B asin (see Locatio n Map), Harbor Park
A ddress(e s): 571 H arbor D r, K ey Biscayne, FL 33149
G P S coo rdinates (d ecim a l deg ree fo rm a t): 25.693712 / -80.162827
P roje ct Z ip C ode (s): 33149
2. T itle ho ld e r: Vill age of B iscayne
3 . Is th e p roje ct site se aw ard of the C o astal C o nstructio n C ontro l Li ne (C C C L)? ['8] Y es D N o
4. P rovide the num b e r of each structure type (listed be low ) in the proje ct area that w ill be affected by the project.
Includ e a// structures in proje ct area .
['8] R e side ntia l pro pe rt y: 485 ['8] Pub lic build ings:
['8] Busine sse s/com m e rcia l pro pe rty: .11 ['8] Sc co ls/ho spitals/ho use s of w o rship : 1
D O the r: Key Biscayne V illa ge H a ll Po lice D e pa rt m e nt, Fire / R e scue D e partm e nt, C ha m b e r of C om m erce
/ V isitors C e nter
B . F lo o d In s u ra n c e R ate M a p (F IR M ) S h o w in g Proje ct S it~
1. ['8] A ttach one (1) copy of the FIR M m a p, a copy of the pa nel inform ation fro m the FIR M , and, if available,
the Flo odw ay M a p . FIR M m ap s are req u ired for this ap p /i ca f on (if p u b lish e d for y ou r area). A lso ,
all attach e d m ap s m u s t h a ve the p ioject site an d s truc tures clearly m a rk ed on th e m ap . FIR M s
are typica lly availa ble fro m yo ur lo ca l floodp la in adm inistrator w ho m ay be located in a pla nning, zoning,
or eng ine e ring off ice . M a ps can also be orde redf rcm the M a p Se , ice C e nte r at 1-8 00-358-9616 . For
m o re info rm atio n abo ut FIR M s, co ntact yo ur. local ag e ncie s or visit the F IR M site on the FE M A W eb
pa ge at https.s m sc.fem a .q o v/po rt a l.
2. U sing the FIR M , dete rm ine the flo od zo ne (s) of the proje ct site (C he ck all zone s in the proje ct area)
(S ee F IR M leg en d for tkxxr zo n e exp lan a tion s) (A Zon e m u st be id en tified)
C . M a p s w ith P roj ct S ite an d l?h o to g ra p h s
1. ['8] A tt ach a copy of city or co unty sca le m a p (la rge enoug h to show the entire proje ct area ) w ith the pro ject
site and structures m a rke d on the m a p.
2. ['8] A tt ach a U S G S 1 :2 4 ,0 0 0 T O P O m a p w ith project site clea rly m a rked on the m a p .
3 . D F o r acquisition or elevatio n proje cts, includ e co py of Parcel M ap (T ax M ap , Pro pert y Id e ntification M ap,
e tc.) show ing each prope rt y to be acqu ired or elevated. In clud e the T ax ID num bers for each parcel, and
Pa rce l info rm atio n - includ ing year bu ilt and foundation.
4. ['8] A tt ach pho tographs (at a m in im um 4 photog raphs) fo r ea ch pro je ct site pe r app lication. T he photographs
sho uld be re prese ntative of the proje ct area , including any relevant strea m s, cree ks, rivers, etc. and
d raina ge areas that aff ect the proje ct site or w ill be aff ected by the proje ct, and la bele d . For each structure,
includ e the follow ing ang le s: fro nt, back and bo th side s.
7
27 P -22 -.0 0 7 F.A.C FD E M Fo rm N o . H M G P A pp licatio n (0 1-2 0 2 0) (E ff . 01-202 0)
Section IV - Budget/Costs
In order to assist applicants with filling out the following Budget section, we have provided the following instructions for
your convenience. For this section, we ask that you provide details of all the estimated costs of the project, as it is used
for the benefit-costs analysis as well as for the feasibility and effectiveness review.
For the cost sections relating to Materials, Labor, and Fees, it is important to note,
• Lump sums without supporting documentation showing a breakdown of those costs are not acceptable. For
those items that will not fit in the spaces provided, attach the appropriate documentation to your application.
• Identify your match sources in sections B and I.
• Sub-Total cells will auto sum the costs in their respective columns.
• Do not factor management costs into parts A-C. If management costs are being requested, see part G.
• Contingency Costs need to be justified and reported as a separate line item in part E of this section. From left to
right in that part, enter the desired percentage (maximum 5% of Material/1,.abor), the amount the percentage is to
be applied to, and the resulting amount. PLEASE NOTE- These cells will not auto-calculate across the row, but
the final cell will be calculated into the Final Project Cost below it. Take care that everything is calculated
correctly.
• Pre-Award Costs: costs must be identified as a separate line item, AND a completed HMGP Pre-Award Cost
Request Form MUST be submitted with this application, detailing the items/cost and requested start date.
• Mark all In-kind (donated) services with (**); In-house (employee) services with (***), per each line item.
• All funding sources (In-kind, In-house, Global Match, and Other Agencies) must be identified (below) AND
identified on the Funding Sources - Section IV I.
For project management costs, in compliance with Disaster Relief and Recovery Act of 2018 (DRRA) and the subsequent
FEMA Interim Policy #104-11-1, the Florida Division of Emergency Management has included a section for applicants to
request, or refuse, project management funds that are avaitable to them. Under this new policy, HMGP projects awarded
under disasters declared on or after August 1, 2017, are eligil5Ie for project management costs up to 5 percent of their
total project costs.
Applicants choosing to apply for this funding must detail the specific administrative costs in Part G of this section. These
costs must be eligible administrative costs, conforming to the requirements set in 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E. Applicants
must ensure that their administrative costs are reasonable, allowable, allocable, and necessary for the performance of the
federal award.
The State will allot these management costs on a project-by-project basis per the amount requested by the sub-recipient,
up to 5 percent of the total project cost. A sub-recipient may request less than this, but no higher. These management
costs will be considered a separate pool of funding, and W ILL NOT affect a project's benefit-cost analysis.
Management costs will be reimbursed per relrnbursement request, and no more than 5 percent of any given
reimbursement request amount. All management costs reimbursements will be contingent upon adequate documentation
from the sub-recipient.
Management costs will be reimbursed at 100 percent of the amount of management costs requested, so far as they are
adequately documented and are no more than 5 percent of the request. Any unused management costs at closeout
following the final payment will be cle-obligated. If the final total project cost results in an under-run, management costs
will be reduced accordingly.
Applicants must make the determination to request or refuse management costs at the time of formal application
submittal. The State will accept the initial determination from the applicant. There will be no recourse from the State for
applicants wishing to change their initial determination after the application has been formally submitted.
8
27 P -22 -.0 0 7 F.A.C FD EM Form No. HM G P Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020)
A . M a te ria ls
Item Unit Quantitv Cost oer Unit Cost
Backfill LS 1 $50,300.00 $50,300.00
Aaaregate Base LS 1 $8,739.00 $8,739.00
Excavation LS 1 $0.00 $0.00
Electrical LS 1 $1,184,820.00 $1,184,820.00
Structural Concrete LS 1 $575,082.00 $575,082.00
Pum ps and Valves LS 1 $2,073,123.00 $2,073,123.00
Precast Screen W all LS 1 $182,228.00 $182,228.00
24" Precast Pile LS 1 $200;560.00 $200,560.00
Secant Pile W all LS 1 $2,472,313.00 $2,472 ,313.00
G rating Platform LS 1 $94,428.00 $94,428.00
CDS Hydro dynam ic Separator LS -1 $201,901.00 $201,901,00
Sub-Total $7,043,494.00
B . L a b o r Include equipm ent costs. Indicate all "soft" or in-kind m atches(**).
D , f' H escno ion - ours ae OS
Backfill "'- 1 $13,129.00 $13,129.00
A aareaate Base .... / 1 $1,678.00 $1,678,00
Excavation ' 1 $105,941.00 $105,941.00
Electrical t' -:-,.-.._ 1 $789,880,00 $789,880.00
Structural Concrete \ \'-..... ---..........~ ' 1 $296,799.00 $296,799.00
Pum ps and Valves \ \ -~ 1 $125,075.00 $125,075.00
Precast Screen W all \ \ 1 $24,72 4,00 $24,72 4.00
24" Precast Pile \ \ 1 $55,338,00 $55,338.00
Secant Pile W all - \ 1 $1,648,208.00 $1,648,208.00
G rating Platform ., 1 $14,688.00 $14,688.00
CDS Hydrodynam ic Separator 1 $134,600.00 $134,600.00
- Sub-Total $3,210,060.00
R t C t
C. Fe e s P a id Include any other costs associated with the project.
D f T, escnotion o ask Hours ate ost
*Pre-Aw ard ;•
'.. ,,
/ V ., '\. ' i " ' '.,, ) I "-- ~ //
"--' ~ /'
Sub-Total $0.00
R C
D.
E . C ontingency C osts (m axim um 5% of M aterial/Labor)
Total Estimated Project Cost $10,253,554. -~-~~--
$512,667.00 5,00% $512,677.00
F. Final Project Cost $10 ,766,221.
Note: To be eligible for HM G P Pre-Aw ard costs - the costs m ust be identified as a separate line item in the estim ate above, AND a
com pleted HM G P Pre-Aw ard Cost Request Form M UST be subm itted with this application, detailing the item s/cost requesting,
M ark al/ In-kind (donated) services with (**); In-house (em ployee) serv ices with (***), per each line item.
9
27P-22-.007 F.A.C FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020)
All funding sources (In-kind, In-house, Global Match, and Other Agencies) must be identified (above) AND identified on the Funding
Sources - Section IV I.
G . Proje ct M a nage m ent C osts
Based on the amount of total project cost being requested in Part D (above), your project is eligible for up to an
additional 5% of that amount for project management costs. Indicate below whether or not you would like to request
these funds and follow the directions for your selected choice.
Total Estimated Management Costs Available (5% of Total Project Costs)
Note: This num ber will be generated automatically after Part I is completed
~ YES, I would like to requests these funds (Fill out the itemized table below, then continue to Part I)*
D NO, I do not wish to request these funds. (continue to Part I)*
$538,311.55
Descttotion ,·• Hours Rate '-. Cost
Kickoff Meeting and Project Startup 60 $200.'00 $12,000.00
State and FEMA Coordination / 80 $200.00, $16,000.00
Construction Contractor Coordination /,,, 100 $200.00 $20,600.00
Monthly Invoicing Oversight ' . 400r $200.00 $80,000.00
Quarterly Reports Oversight '\,. ).. '400 $200.00 $80,000.00
Monthly Site Inspections 180 $200.00 $36,000.00
Public Outreach " 2Q0 $200.00 $40,000.00 ---- ~
Adjacent Neighbor Impact Group Meetings ( ..... -........... ,200 $200.00 $40,000.00
Project Closeout \ ,."""--- --............ 80 't., $200.00 $16,000.00
\ \ ·-... ·-
Advisory Contractor \ \ / ./ / $197,711.15
\ \/ /
. ,----
./ -- "' \ !
// "\ \ \ \
// ) j \ \
L _( LJ \ 1
"'- \. / ----,_v "' '-/ /
~...___,,,.
- ' (
/" ' "' \.,.
H. Total Estimated Management Costs Requested $538,311.15 -------
*Note: By selecting either "yes" or "no" the applicant is acknowledging that they understand what is being offered to them
as it is described in this application.
10
27 P -22 -.0 0 7 F.A.C FDEM Form No. HM G P Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020)
I. Funding Sources (round figures to the nearest dollar)
Th e m ax im u m FE MA s h a re fo r H M G P p rojec ts is 75%. The other 25% can be made up of State and Local funds as well
as in-kind services. HMGP funds may be packaged with other Federal funds, but other Federal funds (except for Federal funds
that lose their Federal identity at the State level, such as CDBG, and certain tribal funds) may not be used for the Non-Federal
share of the costs.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Estim ated F ederal Share
N on-Fed eral Shares
Estimated Local Shares
$8,074,673.00 ____ 7_5_ % of Total (M a xim u m 75 %)
$2,691,558.00
$0.00
7. O ther Agency Share
(Identify Non-Federal Agency and availability date)
_____ 25~· ·~_% of Total (C a sh }
(In -K in d**)
(In -H o use ***)
(G lo b a l M a tch****)
8. Total F unding sources from above 100.00% Total (E q ua ls 10 0 %)
!**Identify proposed eligible activities directly related to project to be considered for In-Kind services in Section IV.C. Fees
!***Identify proposed eligible activities directly related to project to be considered for In-House services in Section IV.C. Fees
!****Separate project applications must be submitted for each Global Match project.
Global Match Project Number and Title: -,,----~~---,----------------------
9. Total Estim ated
M anag em ent Costs
R equested
5% of Total (Max Allowed)
J. Project Milestones/Schedule of Work
List the major milestones in this project by providing an estimated time-line for the critical activities not to exceed a period of 3
years (36-months) 0f performance (e.g . C o n trac tin g, D es ig nin g, E n g ine e rin g, P erm itting, Insp ections , clos e ou t, etc.) ,. .,, . ,
~// '\ ',M ue1 o~o/sJ
N um ber of M onths to
Complete
Stat~i;md''b.ocal Contractina \ ll 2
Construction/ Installation I I 20
Constructidh\Pla'n Developrneni ( 2
Commissionina"° ~\. ~ I 1
Perrnittinq ' V' / 4
Local I nspections/Coinpliance 3
State Final Inspections / Compliance 3
Close out Compliance 1
Total 36 M onths
11
27 P -22 -.0 0 7 F .A.C FD E M Fo rm N o . H M G P A pp licatio n (0 1-2 0 2 0) (Eff. 01-2 0 20)
Section V. Environmental Review and Historic Preservation Compliance
(NOTE: This application cannot be processed if this section is not completed.)
Because the HMGP is a federally funded program, all projects are required to undergo an environmental and historic
preservation review as part of the grant application process. Moreover, all projects must comply with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and associated Federal, State, Tribal, and Local statutes to obtain funding. NO WORK
can be done prior to the NEPA review process. If work is done on your proposed project before the NEPA review
is completed, it will NOT be eligible for Federal funding.
A. The following information is required for the Environmental and Historic Preservation review:
All projects must have adequate documentation to determine if the proposed project complies with NEPA and
associated statutes. The State Environmental Staff provide comprehensive NEPA technical assistance for Applicants,
with their consent, to complete the NEPA review. The type and quantity of NEPA documents required to make this
determination varies depending upon the project's size, location, and complexity. However, at a minimum, provide the
applicable documentation from this section to facilitate the NEPA compliance process.
1. ~ Detailed project description, scope of work, and budget/costs (Section II and Section IV of this application).
2. ~ Project area maps (Section Ill, part B & C of this application).
3. ~ Project area/structure photographs (Section Ill, part C of this application).
4. ~ Preliminary project plans.
5. ~ Project alternatives description and impacts (Section V of the application).
6. ~ Complete the applicable project worksheets.
Documentation showing dates of construction are required for all structures.
7. ~ Environmental Justice - Provide any applicable information or documentation regarding low income or
minority populations in the project area. See Section V.B of this application for details.
8. ~ Provide any applicable information or documentation referenced on the Information and Documentation
Requirements by Project Type below.
B. Executive Order 12898; Environmental Justice for l:iow Income and Minority Population:
1. Are there low income or mino ity populations in the project area or adjacent to the project area?
D No~ Yes; describe any disproportionate and adverse effects to these populations:
With 14,530 people, Key Biscay,lie is the 255th most populated city in the state of Florida out of 950 cities. The
largest Key Biscayne racial/ethnic groups are Hispanic (74.3%) followed by White (23.4%) and Two or More
(1.6%). In 2021. US-bom citizens make up 38.78% of the resident pool in Key Biscayne, while non-US-born
citizens account for 2.8.37%. Additionally, 32.85% of the population is represented by non-citizens. The average
annual household income in Key Biscayne is $245,008, while the median household income sits at $167.990
per- year. White-collar workers make up 95.77 % of the working population in Key Biscayne, while blue-collar
,etnpl6yees account for 4.23%. There are also 1,592 entrepreneurs in Key Biscayne (26.23% of the workforce);
3,012 workers employed in private companies (62.8%); and 261 people working in governmental institutions
(4.3%). Approximately 9.94% of the population in Key Biscayne holds a high school degree (that's 978
residents), while 13.14% have attained a college certificate (1,342 locals) and 37.05% have a bachelor's degree
(3,644 people).
Demographic data shown in this section was gathered from the latest U.S. Census Bureau release, the 2021
American Community Survey.
12
27P-22-.007 F.A.C FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020)
2. [gj To help evaluate the impact of the project, explain below or attach any other information that describes the
population, or portion of the population, that would be either disproportionately or adversely affected. Include specific
efforts to address the adverse impacts in your proposal narrative and budget.
Key Biscayne is a vibrant, residential community on a seven-mile-long, two-mile-wide barrier island only
minutes from downtown Miami in Miami-Dade County. With two oceanfront resorts, the island community
attracts visitors throughout the year.
Although the island has a rich history dating back to 1513, Key Biscayne is now a sophisticated community
with a diverse population of families, seniors, business leaders and professionals from around the globe.
Key Biscayne has terrific beaches and the added appeal of being sandwiched between two major parks -
Crandon Park to the north and Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park, named by Conde Nast Traveler as one of
the best beaches in the nation, to the south. Key Biscayne also offers a nearby coastal barrier reef and the only
federally recognized underw ater archaeological trail in the United States.
The Village of Key Biscayne offers a wide range of services, including poliee protection, fire and emergency
medical service, public works infrastructure and maintenance, a full-service building, zoning, and planning
service activities, solid waste collection, and a comprehensive storm water mana£Jement system.
13
27P-22-.007 F.A.C FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020)
C. Tribal Consultation (Information Required)
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) requires federal agencies to take into account the effect
of their undertakings on historic properties. The NHPA requires that agencies must complete this process prior to the
expenditure of any Federal funds on the undertaking. A Tribal Consultation is required for any project disturbing ground
or moving soil, including but not limited to: drainage projects; demolition; construction; elevation; communication towers;
tree removal; utility improvements.
1. Describe the current and future use of the project location. A land use map may be provided in lieu of a written
description.
Projections for years 2000 to 2040 are based on applying past growth trends, average person per household and
the projected number of units to the next twenty year planning period. While these numbers are useful in planning
for future services and infrastructure, they are to be used as guidance and not as a true prediction. It is likely,
based on recent redevelopment trends in the single family residential areas th~t the Village will continue to
experience population growth in the under 20 age groups, while the age 70 and over groups will decline.
Additionally, population numbers could be skewed by the recent completion of two Developments of Regional
kthe recent past, but will not be continued into the future. The Village_is essentially built-out, with only a handful of
vacant single family residential lots remaining. All future growth will be in the way of redevelopment on existing
platted lots. The Village anticipates no changes to densities or to the Future Land Use that cur-rently exists.
Commercial development is not likely to change in any signifieant way, Crandon Boulevard is developed. The
Future Land Use Map for this planning period is the same as from the previous period (see Future Land Use and
Vacant Parcels Map attachment - excerpted from the July 2007 Evaluation and Appraisal Report prepared by
WRT).
2. Provide information on any known site work or historic uses for project location.
The Tequesta (also Tekesta, Tegesta, Chequesta, Vizcaynos) were a Native American tribe. At the time of first
European contact they occupied an area along the southeastern Atlantic coast of Florida. They had infrequent
contact with Europeans and had largely migrated by the middle of the 18th century.
The Tequesta lived in the southeastern parts of present~day Fiorica. Tt.ley had lived in the region since the 3rd
century BCE and remained for roughly 2,000 year's, By the 1800s, most had died as a result of settlement battles,
slavery, and disease. The Tequesta tribe t:iad only a few survivors by the time that Spanish Florida was traded to
the British, who then established the area as part of the province of East Florida.
The Tequesta tribe livetl on Biscayne Bay in wbat is now Miami-Dade County and further north in Broward County
at least as far Pompano Beach. Their central town (called "Tequesta" by the Spaniards in honor of the chief) was
on the north bank of the Miami River. A village had been at that site for at least 2,000 years. The Tequesta
situated their towns and camps at the mouths of rivers and streams, on inlets from the Atlantic Ocean to inland
waters, and on barrier islands and Keys.
~ Attach a copy of a city OI' county scale map (large enough to show the entire project area) with the horizontal
limits (feet) and vertical depths (square feet) of all anticipated ground disturbance of 3 inches or more.
D. Alternative Actions ttntormetton Hequired)
The NEPA process requires that at least two alternative actions be considered that address the same problem/issue
as the proposed project. In this section, list two feasible alternative projects to mitigate the hazards faced in the
project area. One alternative is the "No Action Alternative".
1. No Action Alternative
14
27P-22-.007 F.A.C FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020)
D iscuss the im pa cts on the proje ct area if no actio n is take n.
T h e V illa ge ope rate s and m a inta ins a sto rm w ater m a nage m ent syste m w hich includes over 17 m ile s of storm
sew e r p ipes, 7 4 1 catch basins and m a nho les, 39 gravity drainage w e lls, 17 outfalls, and 2 sto rm w ater pum p
statio ns, w hich discha rge into gravity w e lls. T he 20 outfalls connect into a netw o rk that co nsists of sw ales, inlets,
gravity drainage w ells, and exf iltratio n tre nch. T he re are also tw o (2 ) sto rm w ate r pum p stations tha t are located on
the e a st sid e of C ra nd o n Blvd.
If no actio n w e re take n the V illage w ill co ntinue to incur flo oding fr om se ve re rainfall and tida l flo oding. T he
syste m 's ability to discha rge w ill co ntinue to dim inish and flood eve nts w ill beco m e m o re fr equent w ith greater
m a gn itude ca using da m a ge s to the villa ge . A s Biscayne Bay and gro undw ate r ele vations increa se, traditional
gravity d ra inage syste m s and conve ntio na l be st m a nage m e nt practice s w ill no t functio n or provide the desired
le vel of se rv ice .
2. Other Feasible Alternative
D e scribe a feasible alte rn a tive proje ct tha t w o uld be the next be st solution if the prim a ry altern a tive is not
acco m p lishe d. T his co uld be an entire ly diff e rent m itigation m etho d or a sig nifica nt m o dification to the design of
the current propo se d proje ct. Include a Sco pe of W ork, eng inee ring de ta ils (if app licab le ), estim ated budget and
the im pacts of this alte rn ative . C o m p le te all of pa rt s a-e (below ).
a. Project Description for the Alternative
D e scribe , in detail, the alte rn a tive proje ct, and expla in how the altem a tive proje ct w ill so lve the problem (s)
and/or provid e pro tectio n from the ha za rd(s). A lso, provid e pros and co ns for this altern a tive and a reason for
w h y it w as not se le cted .
If the V illa ge co nside red injectio n w ells as an option, then an analysis on the groundw ater system w ill be needed
to dete rm ine the ap plica bility and the spa cing of the se system s to not aff ect the groundw ate r le vels as w ell as
the potentia l for m o unding by im ple m e nting the se system s. A T echnica l M e m o ra ndum "D e e p Injection W ells
a s a Storm w ate r M a na ge m e nt O ptio n" w as prepa red fo r the C ity of M ia m i Be ach. T his m e m o states, "during
he avy storm s or abno rm a l hig h-tide s {"K ing ride s") the se sha llow drai~a ge w ells have becom e less reliable
b e ca use the y do not ha ve the ne cessa ry free-boa rd for gravity to dra in the w ater into the underlying injection
ho rizo n. T he refore , the capacity of the se sha llow sto rm w ate r drainage w e lls is he avily influenced by shallow
g roundw ate r elevatio ns, m a gn itude of hig h tide s over m e an se a le ve l and long-te rm sea leve l rise ." T herefo re,
d ra inage w e lls are not a via o le discha rge so urce fo r the future im p rove m ents. Injection w ells w ill also be
a ffected , and the he ad co nditio ns w ill be dim inishe d ove r tim e w hich w o uld req uire raising entire system s over
tim e . In add itio n , m 0 und ing eff ects m a y occur w hich w o uld raise the gro undw ate r to pote ntia lly the land surf ace
d e pe nd ing on the 'ea pacity of the pum ps and lo catio ns of the w e lls.
b. Project Location of the Alternative ( describe briefly, if different from proposed project)
A ttach a m a p or-dia g ram show ing the alte rn ative site in rela tio n to the propo se d proje ct site (if different
from proposed project)
c. Scope of Work for Alternative Project
D e ep lnLectio n W ells are an optio n for discharging storm w ater in the K-8 Ba sin . T he current state U IC
regulatio ns and lo cal h¥,drogeo lo gic co nd itio ns unde rlying the V illa ge of K ey Biscayne w ould allow it to be
feasible to co nstruet a ,e lass V inje ctio n w ell into the Bo ulder Z o ne to pro vide a relia b le m ethod to bett er m anage
sto rm w ater. Acl d itio nally, the injectio n w e lls are lim ited to app roxim ate ly 42 M G D (6 5 cfs) be cause locally
a va ila b le drilling rigs are only capa b le of sup po rt ing the w e ight of the stee l inje ction casing during installation
tha t co rrespo nd s to m a xim um dia m e te r of 36 inche s. T o co nstruct a w e ll, the w e ll site w ill require an
approxim ate 10 0-foot by 15 0-fo ot w ork area and each w ell m ust m aintain a 30 0 to 500 fo ot spacing as to not
be w ithin the co ne of influe nce of anothe r w e ll. T he tota l estim ated co nstruction cost fo r a 20 M G D injection
w e ll w ith a life expe cta ncy of 20 to 25 ye a r and the associated injection w e ll pum p station is approxim ately $9
to $11 m illi o n do lla rs T he estim ated req uired discharge capacity for the pro je ct area is approxim ately 2,380 cfs,
w hich equates to 37 w e lls. H o w ever, the curre nt available locations w o uld only allow fo r app roxim ately 8 w ells
to b e installe d w ithin the V illage , w hich le aves a de ficit of approxim a te ly 1,8 61 cfs.
15
27 P -22 -.0 0 7 F.A.C FD E M Fo rm N o . H M G P A pp licatio n (0 1-20 20 ) (E ff. 01-20 20 )
d. Impacts of Altern ative Project
Discuss the impact of this alternative on the project area. Include comments on these issues as appropriate:
Environmental Justice, Endangered Species, Wetlands, Hydrology (Upstream and Downstream Surface
Water Impacts), Floodplain/Floodway, Historic Preservation and Hazardous Materials.
Due to the decrease in future head conditions as sea level rise occurs, the hydraulic connection between the
ocean and the drainage/injection zone will be reduced and may cause drainage wells to backflow causing
"Sunny Day" flooding. In addition, increasing the number of injection wells will cause a reduction in hydraulic
capacity of the injection zone due to interfering mounding effects to the ground water system which can also
result in higher ground water levels exceeding land surface elevations. Providing additional injection wells is
very expensive and is not be a viable option as a long-term solution for discharging and treating stormwater.
e. Estimated Budget/Costs for Alternative Project
In this section, provide details of all the estimated costs of the alternative project (round figures to the
nearest dollar). A lump sum budget is acceptable.
Materials:
Labor:
Fees:
Total Estimated Prolect Cost:
16
27P-22-.007 F.A.C FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020)
H M G P ENVIR O NM ENTA L REVIEW
Inform ation and Docum entation Requirem ents by Project Type
R etrofits to Existing Facili ties/Structures
E levations
Acquisitions w ith Dem olit ion
! Dates of Construction
! Ground disturbance map for projects with 3 inches or more of ground disturbance
! Structure photographs
Drainag e Im provem ents
! Engineering plans/drawings
! Permit or Exemption letter to address any modifications to water bodies and
wetlands
o Department of Environmental Protection
o Water Management Distrist
o U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
! Ground disturbance map for projects with ;3 inches or more of ground disturbance.
! Concurrence from U.S. Fish and Wildlife addressing any impacts to wildlife, particularly
endangered and threatened species and their habitats.
! If the p oject is in a coastal' area, attach a letter from the National Marine Fisheries
Service adaressing impacts to marine r isources.
! Concurreriee from Natural Resource Conservation Service if project is located outside
city limits and may impact prime or unique farmland.
This is a general guideline for m ost projects. How ever, there will be exceptions.
G;onsult with state e viro nm ental staff on project types not listed.
17
Section VI - Maintenance Agreement
All applicants whose proposed project involves the retrofit or modification of existing public property
or w hose proposed project would result in the public ownership or management of property,
structures, or facili ties, m ust first sign the following agreement prior to submitting the application to
FEMA.
(N O TE: Not applicable to projects solely related to residential or private property.)
The Village of Key Biscayne , State of
Florida, hereby agrees that if it receives any Federal aid as a result of the attached project application,
it will accept responsibility, at its own expense if necessary, for the routine maintenance of any real
property, structures, or facilities acquired or constructed as a result of such Federal aid. Routine
maintenance shall include, but not be limited to, such responsibilities as keeping vacant land clear of
debris, garbage, and vermin; keeping stream channels, culverts, and storm drains clear of obstructions
and debris; and keeping detention ponds free of debris, trees, and woody growth.
The purpose of this agreement is to make clear the Sub-recipient's maintenance responsibilities
following project award and to show the Sub-recipient's acceptance of these responsibilities. It does
not replace, supersede, or add to any other maintenance responsibilities imposed by Federal law or
regulation and which are in force on the date of project award.
Village Manager
(title)
*Note: The above signatu're m ust be by an individual with legal signing authority for the respective
local govern m ent or county (e.g., the Chairperson, Board of County Commissioners or the County
M anager, etc.)
18
[ HMGP Application Completeness Guidance/Checklist
This guidance/checklist contains an explanation, exam ple and/or reference fo r information requested in the application.
U se this list to assure your application is com plete and includes the required information fo r HM G P projects. The appropriate
docum entation must also be attached. It is im portant to note that this list is sim ilar to the fo rm that w ill be used during the
application sufficiency review by the H M G P staff.
Project Title: K -8 B asin Lon g T erm Floo d M itigatio n Project
Applicant: K ey B iscayn e
A pplicatio n
In fo rm ation Explanation of Information Required !
Section I
B A I" ,pp ican n orm a IOn
FE M A - -D R-FL Type in the fo ur digit num ber FEM A assigned to the disaster that this application is ~ being subm itted under. (Exam ple: 4337, 4283)
DIS A S T E R NA M E Type in the D isaster nam e. (Exam ple: H urricane Irma, Tropical Storm Fay) ~
Titl e of P roject The project title should include: 1) Nam e of Applicant, 2) Nam e of Project, 3) Type of ~ Project. (Exam ple: C ity of Tallahassee, C ity Hall Building, W ind Retrofit)
1. A p plicant N am e of organization applying. Must be an eligible applicant. ~
2. A pplicant Type State or local govern m ent, recognized Native American tribe, or private non-profit ~ organization. If private non-profit, attach docum entation show ing legal status as a
501 (C ). (Exam ple: IRS letter, Tax Exem pt C ertificate)
3. Co unty Indicate county in w hich the project is located. '> ~
4. S tate Legislative Specify the appropriate State Senate, H ouse and Congressional District code fo r the ~ and project site. For multiple sites, list codes for each site.
Co ngressio nal http://www . m yfloridahouse. gov/sections/rep resentatives/myrep rese ntative. aspx
District(s)
5. Federal Tax I.D. Li st the Federal Em ployer's Identification N um ber (FEIN), also known as Federal Tax ~ N um ber Identification num ber, 9-digit code. M ay be obtained from your finance/accounting
departm ent.
6. DUN S N um ber Include D ata U niversal N um bering System (D U NS) num ber in appropriate location ~ on application. Typically, this num ber can be obtain through your finance
departm ent. If not, use the link below to look up your entity. If none, exists you can
use the sam e link to request one.
https://w ww .dnb.com/duns-num ber.htm l
7. FIP S Code Li st the Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Code. M ay be obtained ~ from your finance/accounting/grants department. If none, subm it FEMA Form 90-49.
See state w ebsite under the relevant disaster
(https://floridadisaster.org/dem /m itigation/hazard-mitigation-grant-program/)
8. N F IP ID Num ber Li st the National Flood Insurance Program (N FIP) num ber. You must be a ~ participating N FIP m em ber to be eligible for HM G P funding. M ake sure that the
num ber is the sam e as the panel num ber on the FIRM provided with the aoolication.
9. Po int of C o ntact Provide all pertinent information fo r the point of contact. This person serv es as the ~ coordinator of the project. If this info rmation changes once the application is
subm itted, please contact the H M G P staff im mediately.
10. A p plicatio n Provide the preparer inform ation. M ay be different from the point of contact (line 9) " P repared By and/or the applicant's agent (line 11 ).
11. A utho rized An authorized agent m ust sign the application. " A pplicant Agent "An authorized agent is the chief elected official of a local govern m ent who has signature
authority, so for a county it would be the Chairm an of the Board of County Com m issioners and
for a m unicipality it would be the M ayor (the exact title som etim es varies). Any local
govern m ent m ay delegate this authority to a subordinate official (like a City or County
M anager) by resolution of the govern ing body (the Board of County Com m issioners or Board
of Citv Com m issioners). If a local govern m ent delegates signature authoritv, a coov of the
ti f f
19
resolution by the governing body authorizing the signature authority for the individual signing
must be provided."
For Private Non-Profit: A member of its Board of Directors or whoever has authority
to authorize funding for such a project. If this task is delegated down, a copy of a
resolution confirmin this must be rovided.
12. LMS Compliance a) LMS Project List: ~
All proposed projects must be included in the county's Local Mitigation Strategy
(LMS) Project List and must be on file with FDEM's Mitigation Bureau Planning
Unit.
b) LMS Endorsement Letter:
All proposed projects must include an endorsement letter from the county's Local
Mitigation Strategy Coordinator. You may use 1 letter as long as it includes every
proposed project.
c) Estimated Costs & Application Costs:
The LMS Project List must include an Estimated Cost column and each HMGP
project application must be within $500.00 of that Project List's estimated cost.
Also ensure that the Federal Cost Share indicated on the L:MS Coordinator's
Endorsement Letter exactly matches the Feder,al Cost Share indicated within the
application. Ensure the LMS endorsement letter contains both the Total
Estimated Projects Cost (Section IV. D.), along with the Estimated Federal Share
(Section IV. 1.1.) allocated to this prpject.
A letter of endorsement for the project andits priority nunfber from the Local
Mitigation Strategy Project List must be included. Refer to Sample LMS Letter.
Applications without a letter of endorsement will not be processed. (44 CFR 201. 6
Local Miti ation Plans
13. Previous If the project has been previously submitted uriser another disaster, provide the ~
Submittal disaster number, the project number, and the title 'of tlie project.
Section II - Project Description
A. Hazards to be Miti ated/Level of Protection
1. Type of Hazards Type of Hazards tHe Proposed Project will Mitigate: Identify the hazard(s) that the ~
proposed reject will mitigate. More than one hazard may be selected.
2. Identify the Type
of Project
3. Number of
Persons
Protected
4. Total Impacted
Area
5.
ldentlfy-the Type of Broposed Project: Describe the mitigation project being
proposed. (Example: drainage, wing retrofit, generator etc.)
Explain how rnany-people'will be protected by or benefit from the proposed project.
(Examp e: A drainage project improving a residential area of 23 homes, with an
avera e household of 2 eo le = 46 eo le
Explain how many acres will be impacted from the proposed project:
DrainageYBerm/Pond/Culverts/Flood hazard projects: combination of the area to be
· rolecled nd round disturbance must not exceed 25 acres.
Specify the level of protection and magnitude of the event the proposed project will
mitigate. Attach support documentation that verifies the stated level of protection.
(Examp e: In a wind retrofit project, it will be the design wind speed to comply with
the Flerlda Building Code requirements. In a drainage project, it will be the
implemented design level, e.g. a 25-year FOOT design standard for culvert.)
6. Project Impact Identify all the items the project may impact or are within the project area.
7. Engineered
Projects (e.g.
Drainage)
Include available engineering calculations, studies, and designs for the proposed
project showing results from applied Recurrence Interval scenarios before and after
mitigation. (Number of structures, building replacement value, depth of the water,
structural dama es, content dama es, dis lacement, road closures, etc.
B. Project Description, Scope of Work, and Protection Provided (Must be Completed in Detail)
1. Existing Problem Describe the existing problem, location, source of the hazard, and the history and ~ extent of the damage. Include newspaper articles, insurance documentation,
photographs, etc. If this project is eligible for PA (406) mitigation activities, describe
the 406 activities.
2. Type of Protection Determine how the funding will solve the existing problem and provide protection. ~
20
3. Scope of Work: What the Project Proposes to Do: Determine the work to be done. The scope of
work must meet eligibility based on HMGP regulations and guidance. Explain how
the proposed problem will be solved. (NOTE: The proposed project must be a
mitigation action, not maintenance.) Does the proposed project solve a pro blem
independently or constitute a functional part of a solution where there is assurance
that the project as a whole will be com pleted (44 C FR 20 6.434[c][4])? Does the
proposed project address a pro blem that has been repetitive or that poses a
significant risk to public health and safety if left unresolved (44 CFR 20 6.434[c]{5][i])?
Protects that merel identif or anal ze hazards or roblems are not eli ible.
4. On-Going or
Proposed
Projects in the
Area
Determine if other projects, zoning changes, etc. are planned (particularly in the
same watershed if flooding is being addressed) that may negatively or positively
impact the proposed project. If there is a drainage project or downstream issue
elsewhere, it may eliminate the current flooding issue, erasing the need for the
proposed project. Response applies to drainage and ac uisition projects. N/A is
appropriate in wind retrofit shutter projects only. If this project is also being
considered under the Public Assistance Program (406), describe in detail the 406
mitigation activities and/or services. Do not include project costs associated with this
HMGP a lication.
Section Ill - Project Location
A. Site
1. Physical Location List the physical location of the project site(s) including he street number(s), zip
code(s) and GPS coordinates (latitude/loQgitude, in decimal degrees). The physical
address must correspond with the address locations specified on maps submitted
with the a lication.
2. Titleholder Provide the titleholder's name.
3. Project Seaward
of the CCCL?
Determine if the project site is located seaward of the Coastal Construction Control
Line. htt s://floridade . ov/water/coastal-coristruction-control-line
4. Number and
Types of
Structures
Affected
Specify the number and type of prope ies affected QY the project.
(Example: Drainage project that aff~cts 100 homes, 15 businesses and 2 schools.)
What does the project protect? Should have a number next to the box that is
checked. See Section 11, Item A.5 - detail of these totals
8. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Showing Project Site
1. Copies of FIRM
2.
3. Flood Hazard
Bounda ap
FHBM
4. Model
Acknowledge
of Conditions
form
TheFIRM ~
The Model Acknowledgement of Conditions for Mitigation in Special Flood Hazard D
Area form is required for those structures receiving federal funds that will also remain
in the special flood hazard area by the close of the project. This form is required at
application. It can be found on FEMA's website at https://www .fema.gov/media-
libra /assets/documents/15677
D. C. Maps with Project Site and Photographs
1. City/County Map The project site and staging location (if applicable) should be clearly marked on a ~ with Project Site legible City/County map. The map should be large enough to show the project site.
More than one map may be required.
2. USGS TOPO with The project site should be clearly marked on a legible USGS 1 :24,000 TOPO map. ~ Prolect Site To obtain a TOPO map, go to https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/
3. Parcel/Tax Map A Parcel, Tax or Property Identification map is required only for acquisition and ! elevation projects. The location of the structure must be clearly identified.
4. Site Photographs At least four photographs are required that clearly identify the project site. The ~ photos must be representative of the project area, including any relevant streams,
21
creeks, rivers, etc., and drainage areas that affect the project site or will be affected
by the project. The front, back and both side angles are required for each structure.
For acquisition and elevation projects, a photo taken away from the structure (in front
toward the street, and in back toward backyard) to show the area along with
photographs of specific elements of the structure affected by the project (windows for
shutters or window replacements) should also be provided. Label photographs
appropriately. In addition, CDs may be submitted.
Section IV - Budget/Costs
Make sure all calculations are correct. Provide a breakdown of materials, labor and fees for the proposed project. Support
documentation must be attached, i.e. vendor's quote, professional estimate (from engineer, architect, local building official,
etc.). The proposed budget line items should represent allowable costs associated with the scope of work. Contingency
Cost should be included as a line item in the budget section, and justified - Maximum allowed is 5%, and is required to
complete this section; it will be used for the Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA). Costs shoµld be accurate, complete and
reasonable compared to industry standards. Make sure the total cost is correct on _the entire application.
A. Materials List materials and their associated costs. Provide breakq0wn.
B. Labor Provide a breakdown of description, hours, rate, and cost or lump sum labor cost.
Can use in-kind contribution as part of the 25% rnatch. (Attach support
documentation for in-kind, in-house to detail wages and salaries charged for any
contribution. No overtime wa es can be used to satis match contribu ions,
C. Fees Paid Provide a breakdown of associated fees i.e., consultants, studies, engineering,
permits, and project management. Maintenance is not an allowable cost under
HMGP. Pre-award costs ma be re vested See,Pre-award Costs uidance .
D. Total Estimated
Prolect Cost
This number includes all project costs without contingency costs included. Make sure IXJ
all calculations are correct.
E. Contingency Cost Per FEMA's HMA Guidance (Section VI Part D.3.4), a contingency cost is, "an IXJ
allowance in the total cost estimate to cover situations that cannot be fully defined at
the time the cost estimate i~ prepared but that will likely result in additional eligible
costs. Allowances for major Rroject scope cbanges, unforeseen risks, or
extraordinary events may not be incJuaed as contiogency costs."
The applicant may request up to 5°/o of material/labor costs. As with other line items,
the applicant must justify these contingency costs based on the nature of the project
at applieation.
If an applicant wants to include cotttingency costs, they will need to enter the
percentage that they require as well as what amount they want that percentage to be
applied to. Typelhe resulting calculation in the final cell on the right. These cells will
NOT a to-calculate. Be sure that the are calculated correct! .
F. Final Project Cost This number includes any contingency costs that were requested. The final BCA will IXJ
use this number in its final calculation.
G. Project
Management
Costs
H.
After. reading the guidance provided on pg. 5, select either YES or NO to indicate
your need for rnanaqement costs for this project.
If YES, provide a breakdown of description, hours, rate and costs for requested
management costs.
If NO, continue to Part I.
This will'auto complete based on what is entered into the cost cells above. Your
request must not exceed 5 percent of the total project cost available for this project.
I. Funding Sources (round figures to the nearest dollar)
The proposed sources of non-federal matching funds must meet eligibility requirements. (Except as provided by
Federal statute, a cost-sharing or matching requirement may not be met by costs borne by another Federal grant.) 2
CFR Part 200 306
1. Estimated Federal The estimated Federal share is generally 75%. If the Federal share is not 75%, IXI
Share assure actual amount is entered. It could be 50.1234% or 35.1234%, etc. of the total
dollar amount of project depending on county LMS allocation and priority. This figure
cannot exceed 75%.
2. Non-Federal Share May include all 3 sources, i.e. cash, in-kind and global match, as long as the total is a IXI minimum of 25%. Match cannot be derived from a federal agency except Federal
funds that lose their federal identity (e.o., CDBG fundinc and certain tribal fundinq).
22
3. C a s h Cash- Local funding will be utilized for the non-federal share. Enter amount of cash ~
and ercenta e of total that amount re resents.
4 . T o ta l In -K in d May use materials, personnel, equipment, and supplies owned, controlled and D
operated from within governing jurisdiction as an in-kind match. Third party in-kind
contributions would be volunteer services, employee services from other
organizations furnished free of charge, donated supplies, and loaned equipment or
space. The value placed on these resources must be at a fair market value and must
be documented. If in-kind is claimed from outside the applicant jurisdiction, it must be
cash only. ** Identify proposed eligible activities in Section IV B. and C . as a
se arate line with In-kind written as a art of the descri tion.
5. T o ta l In -h o u s e Sub-Recipient employees, equipment, etc. - internal services (must utilize the D
Personnel Activity Report or the Equipment Activity Report for the Request for
Reimbursement
6. T o ta l P roje ct
(G lo b a l) M atch
Project (global) match must 1) meet all the eligibility requirements of HMGP; and 2) D
begin after FEMA's approval of the match project. A separate HMGP application
must be submitted for global match projects. Indicate w ich p(oject(s) will be
matched. The global match is not required to be an identicel project. Projects
submitted as global match for another project must;,meet the same period of
erformance time constraints as the HMGP.
7. O th e r A g e n cy
S h a re
Identify Non-Federal Agency and availability date; provide the oocumentanon from D
the a enc . e .. , CDBG fundin , and certain tribal fundin
8. T o ta l Fu n d in g Total must represent (100%) of the total estimated project cost. Ensure that ~
percentages match corresponding cost-shares and the total matches the Budget (in
Section IV. F. - Total Estimated Proiect Cost .
9. Your requested amount must be equal to or less than 5 percent of the total project ~
cost
J. Project Milestones/Schedule of W ork
1. M ile sto n es
(S c h e d u le )
Identify the major milestones in the proposed project ancl provide an estimated time- ~
line (e.g. Designing, Enginee1ng - 3 mo ths, R rmitting - 6 months, Procurement -
30 days, lnsteltstion - 6 months, Cont-acting - 1 month, Delays, Project
Implementation, spections, Closeout, etc.) for the critical activities not to exceed a
period of ears (36-months) fo performance. Milestones should not be grouped
togetber but listed individually. Allpt for the appropriate amount of time for final
ins ection and closeout about 3 months .
Section V - Environmental Revie.w & Historic Preservation Compliance
No work can begin prior to the completion of'the environmental (NEPA) review. In order for the Environmental staff to
conduct the NEPA review all sections listed below must be completed ,.. ' ·-.;. ·,, "\.":
1. D esc rip tio n , ,w- De~ edt~roject Description, Scope of Work & Budget/Costs. ~ & B u d Q e t/ Com lete Sections II & IV of the aoolication.
2. A rea M ~, Projecf'area Maps·!,Attach a copy of the maps and clearly mark the project site, and ~ place the specific project structure(s) on map(s). Complete Section Ill, part B & C of
the aoolication.
3. P roject ~ Complete Section Ill part C of the application. ~ A re a/S tru c tu re ,~ ·/ P h o to g ra p hs
4. P re lim in a ry Proje ct 1,For shutters see the scope of work and for drainage & elevation see engineering ~ P la n s drawings.
5. P ro je c t Complete Section V part D. of this application. ~ A lte rn a tiv e s
6. P roje c t Dates of construction are required for all structures. See worksheets. ~ W o rks h e ets
7. E n v iro n m e ntal See Section V.B for applicable information. ~ Ju s tic e
D o c u m e ntati o n
8. In fo rm a tio n/ Provide any of the required documentation as listed at the end of Section V in the ~ D o c u m e n tati o n Information and Documentation Requirements by Project Type that may have already
been obtained.
23
Requirements by
Project Type
B. Executive Order 12898, Environmental Justice for Low Income and Minorit
1. Disproportionate Determine if there are populations in either the project zip code or city that are
Effects characterized as having a minority background or living below the poverty level. If yes,
complete the rest of Section V, part B. Describe any disproportionate effects that these
o ulations would ex erience if the roiect were com leted.
2. Population
Affected
Describe the population affected by this project and the portion of the population
adverse! im acted. Attach an documentation and list the attachments here.
C. Information re uired for Tribal Consultation
Documentation for
Tribal Consultation
For all projects with any ground disturbing activities of 3 inches/or more, complete
Section V art C.
D. Alternative Actions
1. No Action
Alternative
2. Other Feasible
Alternative Action
This is a FEMA and FDEM requirement for any/Application Review. A narrative
discussion of at least three project alternatives (from No Action to the most effective,
practical solution) and their impacts, both beneficial and detrimental is required. It is
expected that the jurisdiction has completed sufficient analysis to determine the
proposed project can be constructed as submitted and it supports the goals and
objectives of the FEMA approved hazard mitigation plan. Has the proposed project
been determined to be the most practical, effective and environmentally sound
alternative after consideration of a ran e of o tions? 44 CFR 206.434 c 5 iii
It is very important and a requirement that an Alternative project is submitted.
NEPA requires that at least three alternatives must be presented to mitigate the
problem. In addition to the proposed action and no action, one other feasible
alternative must be provided.
f--b-. _P_r _o-je_c_t_L_o_c_a_t-io_n_o_f--i Describe the surrounding en ironmenl Include tnfortnation regarding both natural
the Alternative (i.e., fish, wildlife, streams, soils, plant life) and built (i.e., public services, utilities,
land/shorelihe use, population density) environments. f------------i Describe how the alternative projecffill solve the problem and provide protection
from.the liazard. Proviae enough detail to describe the project for the evaluation
panel to decide the best course of action for the state. Include any appropriate
diagrams, sketch maps, amount of materials and equipment, dimensions of project,
amount of time required to complete, etc.
f------------1
a. Project
Description
c. Scope of Work -
Alternative Project
d. Impacts of the
Alternative Prefect
e. Estimated
Budget/Costs for
the Alternative
Prolect
Materials, Labor,
and Fees Paid
Detailed line items are not required. Just enter a total amount.
Total Estimated
Prolect Costs
Maintenance
Agreement
!
Complete, sign and date the maintenance agreement. The maintenance agreement
must be signed by an individual with signature authority, preferably the authorized
a ent.
!
Other Required Documentation
G fl "d d. t /d / l f /h 0 to WWW . on a isas er.ore em rnmqa 10n azar -m1 1qa ion-qran -proqram ora 11ona ocumen s
1. Maps All maps must be included with the application.
2. FFATA Form During contracting with the state, complete, sign and date the FFATA Project File ! Form. Instructions are provided for your convenience in the document provided. This
is not required at the time of application submittal.
d l f If ddl Id
24
3. SFHA
Acknow ledgem ent
of C o nditio ns
4. Pre-aw ard Cost
Fo rm
5. R equest for Public
Assistance Fo rm
6. M odel Statem ent
of Assurances for
Property
Acquisitio n
Prolects
7. D eclaration and
R elease
8. Notice of
Voluntary Interest
R e qu ired fo r all proje cts in the Special Flood H azard A rea. R ead and sign the S FH A D
A cknow le dgem e nt of C onditions docum ent. T his fo rm m ust be notarized, signed by
the lo ca l iurisdictio n and the ro ert ow ner.
If pre-aw a rd costs are being requested w ith your project, be sure to identify all pre- D
aw ard costs in the application budget per instructions. T he pre-aw ard cost form m ust
be com leted and subm itt ed w ith our a lication.
A p plica b le if no FIP S num ber is assigned to applicant/recipient. D
F or A cq uisition projects only. D
F or A cquisitio n proje cts only. M ust be signed by all persons w hose nam es are on the D
ro ert de ed.
Fo r A cquisitio n proje cts only. Tw o fo rm s are available fqr your convenience. U se the D
form that is m ost app ropriate to your situation. M ust be signed by all persons w hose
na m es are on the ro ert deed.
9. Statem ent of
Voluntary
Part icipatio n for
A cquisitio n of
Propert y for
Purpose of O pen
S ace
F or A cquisitio n proje cts only. M ust be signed b't all persons w hose nam es are on the D
pro perty deed .
10. W orksheets T he ap p ro p riate w o rksheet(s) m ust be com pleted and subm itted w ith the application. ~
a. Flo od C ontro l - D rainage [rn provem ent
b. G ene rator
c. T o rn ado Sa fe R o om
d.
*Subm it 1 original (signed) and 1 full copy of the entire application and backup documentation.
Include a full copy of the ubmittal and all docu entation on CD or thumb drive.
25
L Attachment Index
= Use the following template to list any supporting documentation that is included on the CD or flashdrive.
Clearly and concisely label each attachment on this form to correspond with the file name on the CD or
flashdrive. In the first column list which section and item (from the HMGP application) the attachment refers to.
Example: Section 2, Item 1. If any required documentation is not included on the CD orflashdrive, the
application will be considered incomplete and will not be considered for possible funding.
Section # & Item Attached Document Name
Section IV Budget Workbook-Application Attachment AACEI Class 5 Construction
1 Item AB&C Cost Estirnate.odf
Section IV Budget Workbook-Application Attachment Construction Schedule and
2 Item J Milestones.odf
Section 111 Item City or County Scale Map-Application Attachment Project Location
3 C Maps.odf
Section 11 item
4 B/BCA Engineerinq - H&H Studv and Desion Plans-OneDrive 1 5-9-2023.zip
Section 111 Item
5 C FIRM Map-Aoolication Attachment FIRM and Floodplain Mao.pdf
Ground Disturbance Map-Application Attachment Ground
6 Section 111 C Disturbance.pdf
Section I item Ll\/1S Endorsement Letter-Application Attachment LMS
7 A RESOLUTION NO 2020-53.pdf
Other-SCA Justification Key Biscayne K-8 Basin long Term Flood
8 BCA Mitigation.pdf
9 BCA Other-K-8 Basin Long Term Flood Mitigation - BCA.xlsx
Section Ill Item Parcel Map-Application Attachment Future Land Use and Vacant
10 C Properties. pdf
Section 111 Item
11 C Project Photograph-Application Attachment High Tide Flood Photos.pdf
Section Ill Item
12 C Project Photograph-Application Attachment Project Location Photos.odf
Section I Item Project Worksheet-Application Attachment Flood Control Drainage
13 A Improvement Worksheet.pdf
Section Ill Item
14 C USGS 1. :24-Application Attachment USGS Mao.odf
Section 11 Item
15 B Scope of Work-Application Attachment K-8 Basin Project SOW.pdf
16
17
18
19
20
26