Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout12-8346 Submit the Application for the Tiger Discretionary Grant Program to the United State Department of Transportation Sponsored by: City Manager Resolution No. 12-8346 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA, TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR THE TIGER DISCRETIONARY GRANT PROGRAM TO THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (US.DOT) REQUESTING FUNDS IN AN AMOUNT UP TO TEN MILLION DOLLARS ($10,000,000.00); PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF RECITALS; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the TIGER Discretionary Grant is for capital investment in surface transportation infrastructure and will provide the funds for the City of Opa-locka's transportation infrastructure improvements; and WHEREAS,the grant will be given to projects that have a significant impact on improving the condition of existing transportation; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Opa-locka desires to use the funds to address a network of roadways with significant damage, flooding problems and to construct new roadways in the City of Opa-;locka; and WHEREAS, the City of Opa-locka, will be required to provide matching funds of 20%of the TIGER Discretionary Grant, payable toward the total eligible costs of the project awarded, WHEREAS,the source of the matching funds will be payable from a number of projects in accounts: 47-541806, 44-541806, 47-541805, 44-541805, 47-541807, 44-541807, 47-541810, 44-541810, 64-533630, 47-541630, 44-541816, 63-533630, 35-535630; and Resolution No. 12-8346 WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Opa-locka authorizes the City Manager to submit an application to the United States Department of Transportation for the TIGER Discretionary Grant: NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals to the preamble herein are incorporated by reference. Section 2. The City Commission of the City of Opa-locka hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to submit an application for the TIGER Discretionary Grant program to the United States Department of Transportation requesting funds in an amount up to Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000.00). Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1St day of March, 2012. ir-At A4CV DO TH JOHNSON VICE MAYOR Attest to: App oved as t fo and legal s roc.-ncy: I4 ._ I •anna Flores Jo :s " _i eller nterim City Clerk Cit Atto rey Resolution No. 12-8346 Moved by: COMMISSIONER MILLER Seconded by: COMMISSIONER HOLMES Commission Vote: 3-0 Commissioner Holmes: YES Commissioner Miller: YES Commissioner Tydus: NOT PRESENT Vice-Mayor Johnson: YES Mayor Taylor: NOT PRESENT _ ..„.e O U s o ^ows-06 Memorandum TO: Mayor Myra L. Taylor Vice Mayor Doroth Johnson Commissioner 'liothy Holmes Commissioner Rose Tydus Commissioner Gail Miller FROM: Bryan K. Finnie, Ci/'►: anager DATE: Februa ry 24, ' RE: Authoriza on to Apply for the Surface Transportation Infrastructure — Discretionary Grant for Capital Investment(TIGER). Request: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR THE TIGER DISCRETIONARY GRANT PROGRAM TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) REQUESTING FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF TEN MILLION ($10,000,000.00); PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Description: The TIGER Discretionary Grant is for capital investments in surface transportation infrastructure and will be awarded on a competitive basis for projects that will have a significant impact on the Nation, a metropolitan area or a region. The FY 2012 Continuing Appropriations Act specifies that TIGER Discretionary Grants may not be less than $10 million and not greater than $200 million. TIGER Discretionary Grants may be used for up to 80% of the costs of a project but priority will be given to projects for which Federal funding is required to complete an overall financing package and projects can increase their competitiveness by demonstrating significant non- Federal contributions. Priority will be given to projects that have a significant impact on improving the condition of existing transportation facilities and systems with particular emphasis on minimizing the life cycle costs; contribute to the economic competitiveness of the United States over the medium-to long-term, foster livable communities through place-based policies and investments that increases transportation choices and access to transportation services for people; improving energy efficiency, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and benefitting the environment; improving the safety of transportation facilities and systems; job creation and near-term economic activity; uses innovative strategies to pursue the long-term outcomes; and demonstrate strong collaboration among a broad range of participants and /or integration with other public service efforts. Eligible projects include, but are not limited to roads, highway or bridge projects; public transportation projects; passenger and freight rail transportation projects; and port infrastructure investments. Financial Impact: A 20% non-Federal match, payable from several account numbers, which are listed in attachment #1, is required. The U.S. DOT will consider any non-Federal funds for purposes of meeting the 20% match requirement, whether such funds are contributed by the public sector, State or local, or the private sector. However, U.S. DOT will not consider funds already expended at the time of the award for the purposes of meeting the 20%match requirement. Implementation Time Line: Immediately. Application due date is March 19, 2012. Legislative History: None Recommendation(s): Staff is recommending the approval. A successful application will provide the City with funds to address a network of roadways with significant damage, flooding problems and construct new roadways. Attachment(s): 1. TIGER Notice of Funding Availability 2. Identified Roadway System Improvements Map. Prepare by: Charmaine Parchment, Grant Writer& Coordinator Mohammad Nasir, City Engineer END OF MEMORANDUM ATTACHMENT 1 SOURCE OF MATCHING FUNDS Below is the list of projects with corresponding account numbers that will be used as the match for the TIGER grant. The projects below total$2,606,714. Project Name FY 20112 Fund Account Budget Number NW 128th Street Drainage Improvements $161,458 PTP Fund 47-541806 NW 128th Street Drainage Improvements $161,458 Capital Projects Fund 44-541806 Total Budget NW 128th Street Drainage $322,916 Improvements NW 143rd Street Drainage Improvements $292,500 PTP Fund 47-541805 NW 143rd Street Drainage Improvements $292,500 Capital Projects Fund 44-541805 Total Budget NW 143rd Street Drainage $585,000 Improvements Rutland Street Improvements $60,414 PTP Fund 47-541807 Rutland Street Improvements $60,414 Capital Projects Fund 44-541807 Total Budget Rutland Street Improvements $120,828 Bus Circulator $145,123 PTP Fund 47-541810 Bus Circulator $238,072 Capital Projects Fund 44-541810 Total Budget Bus Circulator $383,195 Roundabout Design &Construction $12,500 Water&Sewer Fund 64-533630 Roundabout Design &Construction $195,000 PTP Fund 47-541630 Total Budget Roundabout Design & $207,500 Construction Roadway Milling and Resurfacing Projects: Intersection of Sesame&Superior $30,000 PTP Fund 47-541630 Opa-locka Blvd & Burlington East to Sinbad $50,000 PTP Fund 47-541630 Intersection of Jann & Bahman $25,000 PTP Fund 47-541630 Citywide Sidewalk Improvements $200,000 PTP Fund 47-541630 Bus Shelters $152,275 Capital Projects Fund 44-541816 Water Meter Replacement Program $30,000 Water&Sewer Fund 63-533630 SSES CCTV& Lining $300,000 Water&Sewer Fund 35-535630 Water&Sewer Atlas $150,000 Water&Sewer Fund 64-533630 Fire Hydrant Valve & Replacement $30,000 Water& Sewer Fund 64-533630 Leak Detection Program $20,000 Water&Sewer Fund 64-533630 t - !•w '3r .y' �V l,•" 1 '9�1 f.. r r --1��4-'Ettli`i t r y _ i f ti-4 , - pi fi. H W‘ i hrAYe _ t !. 11 t ' 7., z . _t a _ Asti+'an Rd a r z-Ave :, z # # W ` ° y ^_- f rr 1 P e, a r 3 f t M z 1 y 74 _ 1 part Saicrwli-R c�r S J: ir'l W SLs ame S , ` 41' O `t! :4 k Alexandria Dr 4 s. ' e. r . - Aa c P N h V;. At O '' '� y 9 r� r7 Ha - t j J _ C3 Cabo hll e4 it)t h-1k e,,-.- .T.I i C. _ C Vi . ii .`' Y46'38th AaE 1 P ,1.� -.) {r1a}I Setgno{Launa(.arl :q any4pu77/ N s4 •"4 ; : ,43 P(4..i�z.0nN Y ` . 1 M.` r, p _ ��111 cp •.'. 11 \ a „ 0� # any�Pa4_, E R- v= aA! y i�'ZU N ; -� f_••_,.._ : )..,_•, ,..••_ _ . w . -- v F. CD MM ._° _Loma•as vJ "'wS o o PI:i (;&11111 o •^4 •Vo �. $,' • 2`R a.','� t•` ^, \ , R,�-✓may .\ W °O ,_4_______, ., 0- Wit ':,_ r 9�,'1 ' . °,� ` •` /CSI Fey 4 . t} '9. h' ✓ "N i. 4 (� °� 1 it i . r a y.. ,&( z. coca s f y2 (a r w s ■ .� tL...�S ••••••• . ip C"i V - ' , i ei • ry ax wrCYO // Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices 4863 those projects that are transportation activities that are reported on a application and application related.Each area on the fillable pdf quarterly basis. requirements for the National form must be filled in electronically by Respondents:SBTRC Regional Field Infrastructure Investments. the Field Offices and submitted every Offices. The Consolidated and Further quarter to OSDBU.The Offices will Estimated Number of Respondents: Continuing Appropriations Act,2012 retain a copy of each Intake Form for 100. (Pub.L. 112-055,Nov. 18, 2011) ("FY their records.The completion of the Frequency:The information will be 2012 Appropriations Act")appropriated form is used as a tool for making collected quarterly. $500 million to be awarded by the decisions about the needs of the Estimated Number of Responses:100. Department of Transportation("DOT") business,such as;referral to technical Estimated Total Annual Burden on for National Infrastructure Investments.not assistance profession agencies for or trade of the identifying Respondents:Publi Comm 1200 its Invited:You are identical to the appropriation fortthe the business,the type of certification that asked to comment on any aspect of this Transportation Investment Generating the business holds,length of time in information collection,including(a) Economic Recovery,or"TIGER business,and location of the firm.This whether the proposed collection of Discretionary Grant",program data can assist the Field Offices in information is necessary for the proper authorized and implemented pursuant performance of the functions of the to the American Recovery and developing a business plan or adjusting Departm nt including whether the Reinvestment Act of 2009(the toemarket its goods and services to information will have practical utility; "Recovery Act").Because of the buyers and potential users of their (b)the accuracy of the Department's similarity in program structure,DOT services. estimate of the burden of the proposed will continue to refer to the program as information collection; (c)ways to "TIGER Discretionary Grants."As with Respondents:SBTRC Regional Field enhance the quality,utility and clarity previous rounds of TIGER,funds for the Estimated Number of Respondents: of the information collection;and(d) FY 2012 TIGER program are to be 100. ways to minimize the burden of the awarded on a competitive basis for Frequency:The information will be collection of information on projects that will have a significant collected quarterly. respondents,by the use of electronic impact on the Nation,a metropolitan means,including the use of automated area or a region. Estimated Number of Responses:100. collection techniques or other forms of Through this notice,DOT is soliciting Estimated Total Annual Burden on information technology.The agency will applications for TIGER Discretionary Respondents:600 hours per year. summarize and/or include your Grants.In the event that this solicitation Background:The Regional Field comments in the request for OMB's does not result in the award and Offices Quarterly Report Form(DOT F clearance of this information collection. obligation of all available funds,DOT 4502)by each Field Office must be decide to publish an additional submitted as a quarterly status report of Authority:The Paperwork Reduction Act may e P business activities conducted during the of 1995;44 U.S.C.Chapter 35,as amended; solicitation(s). three month time frame.The form is and 49 CFR 1:48. DATES:Pre-applications must be used to capture activities and Issued in Washington,DC on January 24, submitted by February 20, 2012,at 5 accomplishments that were made by the 2012. p.m.EST(the"Pre Application Regional Field Offices during the course Brandon Neal, Deadline").Final applications must be of the quarter.In addition,the form Director,Office of Small and Disadvantaged, submitted through Grants.gov by March includes a data collection section where Business Utilization. 19,2012,at 5 p.m.EDT(the numbers and hours are reported and a [FR Doc.2012-2044 Filed 1-30-12;8:45 am] "Application Deadline").The DOT pre- section that is assigned for a written BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P application system will open on or narrative that provides back up which before February 13,2012,to allow supports the data. prospective applicants to submit pre- Activities to be reported are(1) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION applications.Subsequently,the Counseling Activity which identifies the Grants.gov"Apply"function will open Office of the Secretary of on February 22,2012,allowing counseling hours provided to Transportation Y g businesses,number of new applicants to submit applications. appointments,and follow-up on [Docket No.DOT—OST-2012-0012] Applicants are encouraged to submit counseled clients. (2)Activity for pre-applications and applications in Businesses Served identifies the type of Notice of Funding Availability for the advance of the deadlines. small business that is helped,such as a Department of Transportation's ADDRESSES:Pre-applications must be DBE,8(a),WOB,HubZone,SDB, National Infrastructure Investments submitted electronically to DOT and SDVOB,or VOSB. (3)Marketing Under the Full-Year Continuing applications must be submitted Activity includes the name of an event Appropriations,2012;and Request for electronically through Grants.gov.Only attended by the SBTRC and the role Comments pre-applications received by DOT and played when participating in a AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of applications received electronically conference,workshop or any other Transportation,DOT. through Grants.gov will be deemed venue that relates to small businesses. ACTION:Notice of Funding Availability, submitting rop filed.Instructions to DOT and (4)Meetings that are held with Request for Comments. pre-applications government representatives in the applications through Grants.gov are region,or at the state level,are an SUMMARY:This notice announces the included in Section VII(Pre-Application activity that is reported. (5)Events availability of funding and requests and Application Cycle). Hosted by the SBTRC Regional Field proposals for the Department of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For Offices,such as small business Transportation's National Infrastructure further information concerning this workshops,financial assistance Investments.In addition,this notice notice please contact the TIGER workshops,matchmaking events,are announces selection criteria and pre- Discretionary Grant program staff via 4864 Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices email at TIGERGrants @dot.gov,or call Grants and prospective applicants August 12, 2011,Federal Register Howard Hill at(202)366-0301.A TDD should read this notice in its entirety so notice. is available for individuals who are deaf that they have the information they FY 2012 TIGER Discretionary Grants or hard of hearing at(202) 366-3993.In need to submit eligible and competitive addition,DOT will regularly post applications. Like the previous rounds,this year's answers to questions and requests for Table of Contents TIGER Discretionary Grants are for clarifications on DOT's Web site at capital investments in surface www.dot.gov/TIGER.Applicants are I.Background transportation infrastructure and are to encouraged to contact DOT directly and TIGER Discretionary Grants be awarded on a competitive basis for II.Selection Criteria and Guidance on that will have a significant rather than rely on third parties to projects g receive information about TIGER Application of Selection Criteria impact on the Nation,a metropolitan III.Evaluation and Selection Process Discretionary Grants. IV.Grant Administration area,or a region. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:This V.Projects in Rural Areas "Eligible Applicants"for TIGER notice is substantially similar to the VI.TIGER TIFIA Payments Discretionary Grants are State,local, Final notice published for the TIGER Application Requirements and tribal governments,including U.S. Discretionary Grant program in the VII.Pre-Application and Application Cycle territories,transit agencies,port Federal Register on August 12,2011. VIII.Project Benefits authorities,metropolitan planning g g IX.Questions and Clarifications organizations (MPOs),other political However,there are a few significant Appendix A:Additional Information on differences: Benefit-Cost Analysis subdivisions of State or local 1.To ensure applicants receive the Appendix B:Additional Information on governments,and multi-State or multi most accurate information possible, Applying Through Grants.gov jurisdictional groups applying through a Eligible Applicants must contact DOT Appendix C:Additional Information on single lead applicant(for multi- directly,rather than through Guidelines for Project Readiness jurisdictional groups,each member of intermediaries,to get questions I.Background the group,including the lead applicant, answered,set up briefings on the TIGER must be an otherwise Eligible Applicant answered,set Grants selection and On November 18, 2011,the President as defined in this paragraph). Discretionary signed the FY 2012 Appropriations Act. To ensure applicants receive the most award process,or receive other This Act appropriated$500 million to accurate information possible,Eligible assistance. DOT for National Infrastructure Applicants must contact DOT directly, 2.As in previous rounds of TIGER, Investments,using language that is rather than through intermediaries,to high speed and intercity passenger rail similar,but not identical to the language get questions answered,set up briefings projects remain eligible for funding in appropriations bills from FY 2010 on the TIGER Discretionary Grants under this program and a high priority and FY 2011 and the Recovery Act. selection and award process,or receive of this Administration.DOT would like This program was first created in the other assistance.Assistance can be to encourage those seeking funding for 2009 Recovery Act,since which time obtained by simply calling or emailing passenger rail projects to consider DOT has referred to these grants as the TIGER Discretionary Grant program TIGER and will,therefore,make up to Transportation Investment Generating staff via email at TIGERGrants @dot.gov, $100 million in TIGER funds available Economic Recovery or"TIGER or by calling Howard Hill at(202)366— to high speed and intercity passenger Discretionary Grants."Through the 0301. rail projects. Recovery Act and continuing through Projects that are eligible for TIGER 3.Applications must include a the FY 2010 and 2011 appropriations Discretionary Grants ("Eligible detailed statement of work,detailed processes,Congress has provided DOT Projects")include,but are not limited project schedule,and detailed project with three rounds of competitive grants to: (1)Highway or bridge projects budget in the project narrative.Due to totaling just over$2.6 billion for capital eligible under title 23,United States the shorter timeframe allowed for the investments in surface transportation Code; (2)public transportation projects obligation of TIGER Discretionary Grant infrastructure. See DOT's Web site at eligible under chapter 53 of title 49, funds in this round of funding in http://www.dot.gov/tiger/index.html for United States Code; (3)passenger and comparison to previous rounds, further background on the disbursement freight rail transportation projects;and applicants must include this detailed of past rounds of TIGER Discretionary (4)marine port infrastructure information in their application in order Grants. investments.Federal wage rate to demonstrate that their projects are DOT's most recent solicitation for requirements included in subchapter IV ready to proceed within this shortened TIGER Discretionary Grants occurred of chapter 31 of title 40,United States timeframe. through a notice of funding availability Code,apply to all projects receiving 4.The discussion on Benefit-Cost published in the Federal Register on funds,and apply to all parts of the Analysis(Appendix A:Additional August 12,2011 (an interim notice was project,whether funded with TIGER Information on Benefit-Cost Analysis) published on July 1,2011).Applications Discretionary Grant funds,other federal has been streamlined and includes tools for TIGER Discretionary Grants were funds,or non-federal funds.This to aid applicants in preparing their due on October 31,2011 and 848 description of Eligible Projects is analyses. applications were received with funding identical to the description of eligible Other than these differences,and requests totaling approximately$14.29 projects under earlier rounds of the minor edits for clarification and those billion.Awards for 46 capital projects TIGER Discretionary Grant program.' made to conform the notice to the totaling$511 million were announced statutory circumstances of this round of on December 15,2011.Grant awards Consistent with the FY 2012 Appropriations TIGER Discretionary Grants funding, ranged from$1 million to$13.5 million Act,DOT will apply the following principles in there have been no material changes for projects in rural areas and$10 determining whether a project is eligible as a capital made to the notice.Each section of this million to$20 million for projects in investment in surface transportation:(1)surface notice contains information and urban areas.Projects were selected for transportation facilities generally include roads, f highways and bridges,marine ports,freight and instructions relevant to the application funding based on their alignment with passenger railroads,transit systems,and projects process for these TIGER Discretionary the selection criteria specified in the that connect transportation facilities to other modes Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices 4865 As was the case in earlier rounds of The FY 2012 Appropriations Act percent non-Federal cost share and a the TIGER Discretionary Grant program, specifies that TIGER Discretionary minimum grant size of$10 million,the Eligible Projects do not include Grants may be not less than$10 million minimum total project size for an research,demonstration,or pilot (except in rural areas)and not greater eligible project is$12.5 million(where projects that do not result in publically than$200 million.The FY 2012 the minimum$10 million TIGER accessible surface transportation Appropriations Act does not provide Discretionary Grant request represents infrastructure.To be funded,projects or authority to waive the minimum$10 80 percent of the total project cost).The elements of a project must demonstrate million grant size for projects located in minimum total project size for an independent utility,which means that urbanized areas.For projects located in eligible project in a rural area is$1 the project provides transportation rural areas(as defined in Section V million(where the entire project cost is benefits and is ready for broad public (Projects in Rural Areas)),the minimum funded with a TIGER Discretionary use upon completion of project TIGER Discretionary Grant size is$1 Grant).However,the statutory construction. million.The term"grant"in the requirement to give priority to projects Each applicant may submit no more provision of the FY 2012 that use Federal funds to complete an than three applications for Appropriations Act specifying a overall financing package applies to consideration to the TIGER minimum grant size does not include projects located in rural areas as well, Discretionary Grant Program to focus TIGER TIFIA Payments,as described and projects located in rural areas can submissions on those applications that below. increase their competitiveness for are most likely to align well with DOT's DOT reserves the right to award funds purposes of the TIGER program by selection criteria.While applications for a part of the project,not the full demonstrating significant non-Federal may include requests to fund more than project,if a part of the project has financial contributions.In the FY2011 one project,applicants may not bundle independent utility and aligns well with competition,on average,urban projects together unrelated projects in the same the selection criteria specified in this pledged 65% non-Federal funds while application for purposes of avoiding the notice. rural projects featured more than 46% three application limit that applies to Pursuant to the FY 2012 non-Federal funds.Three TIGER—TIFIA each applicant.Please note that the Appropriations Act,no more than 25 projects will use only 2%TIGER funds percent of the funds made three application limit applies only to TIGER Discretionary Grants (or$125 non-Federal non-Federal investment$DOTiI`ltt billion applications where the applicant is the million)may be awarded to projects in lead applicant,and there is no limit on y P 1 consider any non-Federal funds as well applications for which an applicant can a single State. as funds from the Indian Reservation be listed as a partnering agency.Also, The FY 2012 Appropriations Act Roads Program as a local match for DOT will not count any agency.of for directs that not less than$120 million purposes of this program,whether such a multistate project against the three of the funds provided for TIGER funds are contributed by the public application u tist limit ct against extent multiple Discretionary Grants be used for projects sector(State or local)or the private P located in rural areas.Further,in sector.However,DOT cannot consider states are partnering to submit the awarding TIGER Discretionary Grants funds already expended as a local application.Furthermore,jurisdictions pursuant to the FY 2012 Appropriations match. that collaborate with regional partners Act,DOT must take measures to ensure The 2012 Appropriations Act requires on a priority application are more likely an equitable geographic distribution of that TIGER funds are only available for to be successful than those that choose grant funds,an appropriate balance in obligation through September 30, 2013. separate priorities and apply separately addressing the needs of urban and rural The limited amount of time for which because DOT will give priority to areas and the investment in a variety of the funds will be made available means applications that demonstrate a high transportation modes.As in previous that DOT will focus on the extent to degree of Jurisdictional&Stakeholder rounds of TIGER,high speed and which a project is ready to proceed with Collaboration(see Section II.Selection intercity passenger rail projects remain obligation of grant funds when Criteria and Guidance on Application of eligible for funding under this program evaluating applications,and give Selection Criteria).If any lead applicant and a high priority of this priority to those projects that are ready submits more than three applications, Administration.DOT would like to to proceed sooner than other only the first three received will be encourage those seeking funding for competitive projects. considered. passenger rail projects to consider The FY 2012 Appropriations Act The FY 2012 Appropriations Act TIGER and will,therefore,make up to allows for an amount not to exceed$175 requires a new solicitation of $100 million in TIGER funds available million of the$500 million to be used applications and,therefore,any to high speed and intercity passenger to pay the subsidy and administrative unsuccessful applicant for earlier rail projects. costs for a project receiving credit rounds of TIGER Discretionary Grants TIGER Discretionary Grants may be assistance under the Transportation that wishes to be considered for a TIGER used for up to 80 percent of the costs of Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Discretionary Grant this year must a project,but priority must be given to Act of 1998("TIFIA")program,if it reapply according to the procedures in projects for which Federal funding is would further the purposes of the this notice. required to complete an overall TIGER Discretionary Grant program. financing package and projects can DOT is referring to these payments as of transportation;and(2)surface transportation increase their competitiveness by "TIGER TIFIA Payments."The amount facilities also include any highway or bridge project demonstrating significant non-Federal of budget authority required to support eligible under title 23,U.S.C.,or public contributions.DOT may increase the TIFIA credit assistance is calculated on transportation project eligible under chapter 53 of title 49,U.S.C.Please note that the Department may Federal share above 80 percent only for a project-by-project basis.Applicants for use a TIGER Discretionary Grant to pay for the projects located in rural areas,in which TIGER TIFIA Payments should submit surface transportation components of a broader case DOT may fund up to 100 percent an application pursuant to this notice project that has non-surface transportation of the costs of a project.Therefore,for and a separate TIFIA letter of interest,alicants are encouraged to components,apply for TIGER Di sc R D retionary Grants to pay for the projects located in urban areas,based on as described below in Section VI(TIGER surface transportation components of these projects. the statutory requirements of at least 20 TIFIA Payments).Unless otherwise 4866 Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices noted,or the context requires otherwise, eligibility requirements for this (42 U.S.C. 3161) ("Economically references in this notice to TIGER program,which are specified in this Distressed Areas").2 Discretionary Grants include TIGER notice as relevant.This section is 2. Secondary Selection Criteria TIFIA Payments. divided into two parts.Part A(Selection Due to the limited funding available Criteria)specifies the criteria that DOT (a)Innovation under this program,applicants that will use to rate projects.Additional DOT will give priority to projects that require a substantial amount of funds to guidance about how DOT will apply use innovative strategies to pursue the complete a financing package should these criteria,including illustrative long-term outcomes outlined above. consider whether a TIGER TIFIA metrics and examples,is provided in Payment may provide more value for Part B (Additional Guidance on (b)Partnership their project than a comparable award of Selection Criteria). DOT will give priority to projects that grant funds.DOT reserves the right to A.Selection Criteria demonstrate strong collaboration among offer a TIGER TIFIA Payment to an a broad range of participants,integration applicant that applied for a TIGER TIGER Discretionary Grants will be of transportation with other public Discretionary Grant even if DOT does awarded based on the selection criteria service efforts,and/or are the product of not choose to fund the requested TIGER as outlined below.There are two a robust planning process. Discretionary Grant and the applicant categories of selection criteria,"Primary did not specifically request a TIGER Selection Criteria"and"Secondary B.Additional Guidance on Selection TIFIA Payment. Selection Criteria." Criteria While TIFIA support has most often 1.Primary Selection Criteria The following additional guidance been sought for road and bridge projects (a)Long Term Outcomes explains how DOT will evaluate each of (including multiple TIGER TIFIA the selection criteria identified above in payments for managed lanes projects), DOT will give priority to projects that Section II(A) (Selection Criteria). TIFIA is a multimodal program.DOT have a significant impact on desirable Applicants are encouraged to encourages applicants seeking support long-term outcomes for the Nation,a demonstrate the responsiveness of a for large multimodal projects that meet metropolitan area,or a region. project to any and all of the selection TIFIA eligibility criteria,including Applications that do not demonstrate a criteria with the most relevant major transit projects,to consider TIGER likelihood of significant long-term information that applicants can provide, TIFIA Payments as a means for federal benefits in this criterion will not regardless of whether such information support of these projects.In the past two proceed in the evaluation process.The has been specifically requested,or rounds of TIGER Discretionary Grants, following types of long-term outcomes identified,in this notice.Any such two TIGER TIFIA Payments were will be given priority: information shall be considered part of awarded to transit agencies for the (i)State of Good Repair:Improving the application,not supplemental,for expansion of fixed guideway transit the condition of existing transportation purposes of the application size limits systems. facilities and systems,with particular specified below in Section VII(D) TIGER grant recipients may apply for emphasis on projects that minimize life- (Length of Application). funding to support additional phases of cycle costs. a project awarded funds in earlier (ii)Economic Competitiveness: 1.Primary Selection Criteria rounds of this program.However,to be Contributing to the economic (a)Long-Term Outcomes competitive,any phase awarded competitiveness of the United States In d orer to measure a project's funding in the past should be at or near over the medium-to long-term. ali nor with this criterion,DOT will completion,and the applicant should (iii)Livability:Fostering livable g provide data about how the project is communities through policies and assess the public benefits generated by P P investments that increase transportation the project,as measured by the extent to performing based on the benefits which a roject produces one or more expected in the original application. choices and access to transportation of the followin outcomes. The FY 2012 Appropriations Act services for people in communities g across the United States. (i)State of Good Repair:In order to provides that the Secretary of determine whether the project will Transportation may retain up to$20 (iv)Environmental Sustainability: P 7 million of the$500 million to fund the Improving energy efficiency,reducing improve the condition of existing award and oversi ht of TIGER dependence on oil,reducing greenhouse transportation facilities or systems, g gas emissions and benefitting the including whether life-cycle costs will Discretionary Grants.Portions of the$20 g g be minimized,DOT will assess (i) million may be transferred for these environment. y (v) Safety:Improving the safety of whether the project is part of,or purposes to the Administrators of the U.S.transportation facilities and consistent with,relevant State,local or Federal Highway Administration,the systems. regional efforts and plans to maintain Federal Transit Administration,the transportation facilities or systems in a Federal Railroad Administration,and (b)Job Creation and Near-Term state of good repair,(ii)whether an the Federal Maritime Administration. Economic Activity important aim of the project is to The purpose of this notice is to solicit Job creation and near-term economic rehabilitate,reconstruct or upgrade applications for TIGER Discretionary activity remain a top priority of this Grants.This is a final notice. Administration;therefore,DOT will 2 While Economically Distressed Areas are TIGER Discretionary Grants give priority to projects that are typically identified under the Public Works and Economic Development Act at the county level,for II.Selection Criteria and Guidance on expected to quickly create and preserve the purposes of this program DOT will consider jobs and promote rapid increases in regions,municipalities,smaller areas within larger Application of Selection Criteria economic activity,particularly jobs and communities,or other geographic areas to be This section specifies the criteria that activity that benefit economically Economically Distressed Areas if an applicant can DOT will use to evaluate applications distressed areas as defined by section demonstrate that any such area otherwise meets the PP y requirements of an Economically Distressed Area as for TIGER Discretionary Grants.The 301 of the Public Works and Economic defined in section 301 of the Public Works and criteria incorporate the statutory Development Act of 1965,as amended Economic Development Act of 1965. Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices 4867 surface transportation assets that,if left Economic competitiveness may be transportation choices.3 Specifically, unimproved,threaten future demonstrated by the project's ability to DOT will qualitatively assess whether transportation network efficiency, increase the efficiency and effectiveness the project: mobility of goods or accessibility of of the transportation system through (1)Will significantly enhance or people,or economic growth due to their integration or better use of all existing reduce the average cost of user mobility poor condition, (iii)whether the project transportation infrastructure.This may through the creation of more convenient is appropriately capitalized up front and be evidenced by the project's transportation options for travelers; uses asset management approaches that involvement with or benefits to more (2)Will improve existing optimize its long-term cost structure, than one mode and/or its compatibility transportation choices by enhancing and(iv)the extent to which a with and its connection to other modes points of modal connectivity,increasing sustainable source of revenue is and facilities.Applications that the number of modes accommodated on available for long-term operations and demonstrate increases in efficiency for existing assets,or reducing congestion maintenance of the project.The exports will be given priority in the on existing modal assets; application should include any evaluation process. (3)Will improve accessibility and quantifiable metrics of the facility or For purposes of demonstrating transport services for economically system's current condition and economic benefits,applicants should disadvantaged populations,non-drivers, performance and,to the extent possible, estimate National-level or region-wide senior citizens,and persons with projected condition and performance, economic benefits on productivity and disabilities,or will make goods, with an explanation of how the project production(e.g.,reduced shipping costs commodities,and services more readily will improve the facility or system's or travel times for U.S.exports available to these groups;and/or condition,performance and/or long- originating both inside and outside of (4)Is the result of a planning process term cost structure,including the region),and should take care not to which coordinated transportation and calculations of avoided operations and include economic benefits that are being land-use planning decisions and maintenance costs and associated shifted from one location in the United encouraged community participation in delays. States to another location.Highly the process,such as planning conducted (ii)Economic Competitiveness:In localized benefits will receive the most with TIGER II Planning Grants,the order to determine whether a project consideration under circumstances Department of Housing and Urban promotes the economic competitiveness where such benefits are most likely to Development's Regional Planning of the United States,DOT will assess improve an Economically Distressed Grants,or the Environmental Protection whether the project will measurably Area(as defined herein)or otherwise Agency's Brownfield Area-Wide contribute over the long term to growth improve access to more productive Planning Pilot Program as well as employment opportunities for under- technical assistance programs focused in the productivity of the American economy.For purposes of aligning a employed and disadvantaged on livability or economic development project with this outcome,applicants po ulations. planning. (iii)Livability:Livability investments Livability improvements may include should provide evidence of how are projects that not only deliver projects for new or improved biking and improvements in transportation transportation benefits,but are also walking infrastructure.However, outcomes(such as time savings and designed and planned in such a way particular attention will be paid to the operating cost savings)translate into that they have a positive impact on degree to which such projects contribute long-term economic productivity qualitative measures of community life. significantly to broader traveler benefits.These long-term economic This element of long-term outcomes mobility,including for people with benefits that are provided by the delivers benefits that are inherently completed project are different from the Y disabilities,through edjob om P P 1 difficult to measure.However,it is connections,enhanced job commuting near-term economic benefits of implicit to livability that its benefits are options,or improved connections construction that are captured in the Job shared and therefore magnified by the between residential and commercial Creation&Near-Term Economic number of potential users in the affected areas.Projects that appear designed Activity criterion.In weighing long-term community.Therefore,descriptions of primarily as recreational facilities and economic competitiveness benefits, how projects enhance livability should do not enhance traveler mobility as applicants should describe how the include a description of the affected described above will not be funded. project supports increased long-term community and the scale of the project's (iv)Environmental Sustainability:In efficiency and productivity. impact as measured in person-miles order to determine whether a project Priority consideration will be given to traveled or number of trips affected.In promotes a more environmentally projects that:(i)Improve long-term order to determine whether a project sustainable transportation system,DOT efficiency,reliability or cost- improves the quality of the living and will assess the project's ability to: competitiveness in the movement of working environment of a community, (1)Improve energy efficiency,reduce workers or goods,with a particular DOT will consider whether the project dependence on oil and/or reduce focus on projects that have a significant furthers the six livability principles greenhouse gas emissions, (applicants effect on reducing the costs of developed by DOT with the Department are encouraged to provide quantitative transporting export cargoes,or(ii)make of Housing and Urban Development information regarding expected improvements that increase the (HUD)and the Environmental reductions in emissions of CO2 or fuel economic productivity of land,capital Protection Agency(EPA)as part of the consumption as a result of the project, or labor at specific locations, Partnership for Sustainable or expected use of clean or alternative particularly Economically Distressed Communities,which are listed fully at Areas.Applicants may propose other http://www.dot.gov/affairs/2009/ 3In full,this principle reads:"Provide more methods of demonstrating a project's dot8009.htm.For this criterion,the transportation choices.Develop safe,reliable and contribution to the economic Department will give particular economical transportation choices to decrease competitiveness of the country and such consideration to the first principle, household transportation costs,reduce our nations' P rY dependence on foreign oil,improve air quality, methods will be reviewed on a case-by- which prioritizes the creation of reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote case basis. affordable and convenient public health." 4868 Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices sources of energy;projects that compare expected benefits and costs, achieved through construction of the demonstrate a projected decrease in the subject to the following qualifications: project. movement of people or goods by less All applicants will be expected to (b)Job Creation and Near-Term energy-efficient vehicles or systems will prepare an analysis of benefits and Economic Activity be given priority under this factor);and costs;however,DOT understands that In order to measure a project's (2)Maintain,protect or enhance the the detail of analysis that should be alignment with this criterion,DOT will environment,as evidenced by its expected(for items such as surveys, assess whether the project promotes the avoidance of adverse environmental travel demand forecasts,market short-or long-term creation or impacts(for example,adverse impacts forecasts,statistical analyses)is less for preservation of jobs and whether the related to air or water quality,wetlands, smaller projects than for larger projects. project rapidly promotes new or and endangered species)and/or by its The level of resources devoted to expanded business opportunities during environmental benefits (for example, preparing the benefit-cost analysis construction of the project or thereafter. improved air quality,wetlands creation should be reasonably related to the size Applicants are encouraged to provide or improved habitat connectivity). of the overall project and the amount of information to assist DOT in making Applicants are encouraged to provide grant funds requested in the application. these assessments,including the total quantitative information that validates Any subjective estimates of benefits and amount of funds that will be expended the existence of substantial costs should still be quantified,and on construction and construction- transportation-related costs related to applicants should provide whatever related activities by all of the entities energy consumption and adverse evidence they have available to lend participating in the project and,to the environmental effects and evidence of credence to their subjective estimates. extent measurable,the number and type the extent to which the project will Estimates of benefits should be of jobs to be created and/or preserved by reduce or mitigate those costs. presented in monetary terms whenever the project by calendar quarters during (v) Safety:In order to determine possible;if a monetary estimate is not construction and annually thereafter. whether the project improves safety, possible,then at least a quantitative Applicants should also identify any DOT will assess the project's ability to estimate(in physical,non-monetary business enterprises to be created or reduce the number,rate and terms,such as crash rates,ridership benefited by the project during its consequences of surface transportation- estimates,emissions levels,etc.)should construction and once it becomes related crashes,injuries,and fatalities be provided. operational. among drivers and/or non drivers in the The lack of a useful analysis of DOT will continue to apply the United States or in the affected expected project benefits and costs may Updated Implementing Guidance for the metropolitan area or region,and/or the be the basis for not selecting a project American Recovery and Reinvestment project's contribution to the elimination for award of a TIGER Discretionary Act of 2009 issued by the Office of of highway/rail grade crossings,the Grant to an applicant.If it is clear to Management and Budget("OMB")on protection of pipelines,or the DOT that the total benefits of a project April 3,2009(the"OMB Guidance")to prevention protection of pipelines,or release of are not reasonably likely to justify the the TIGER Discretionary Grants program hazardous materials. project's costs,DOT will not award a TIGER Discretionary Grant to the 5 The Executive Office of the President,Council Evaluation of Expected Project Costs of Economic Advisers,(CEA),issued a and Benefits:DOT believes that benefit- project. memorandum in May 20.09 on"Estimates of Job f Detailed guidance for the preparation Creation from the American Recovery and cost analysis("BCA")is an important of benefit-cost analyses is provided in Reinvestment Act of 2009."That memorandum discipline.For BCA to yield useful Appendix A.Benefits should be provides a simple rule for estimating job-years results,a robust consideration of costs created by government spending,which is that presented,whenever possible,in a and benefits is necessary.These include tabular form showin g benefits and costs $92,000 of government spending creates one job- quantified fuel and travel time year(or 10,870 job-years per billion dollars of Q an savings in each year for the useful life of the spending).More recently,in September 2011,based as well as reductions in greenhouse gas project.Benefits and costs should both on further analysis both of actual job-creation emissions,water quality impacts,and be discounted to the year 2012,and experience from transportation projects under the public health effects as well as present discounted values of both the Recovery Act and on further macroeconomic uantlfication of other costs and p analysis,the CEA determined that a job-year is q stream of benefits and the stream of created by every$76,923 in transportation benefits that are more indirectly related costs should be calculated.If the project infrastructure spending(or 13,000 job-years per to vehicle-miles or that are harder to has multiple parts,each of which has billion dollars of transportation infrastructure measure.In addition,BCA should independent utility,the benefits and spending).This figure can now be used in place of attempt to measure the indirect effects p y' the earlier$92,000/job-year estimate.Applicants p costs of each part should be estimated can use this estimate as an appropriate indicator of of transportation investments on land and presented separately.The results of direct,indirect and induced job-years created by use and on the portions of household the benefit-cost analysis should be TIGER Discretionary Grant spending,but are budgets spent on transportation.The summarized in the Project Narrative encouraged to supplement or modify this estimate Project to the extent they can demonstrate that such systematic process of comparing section of the application itself,but the modifications are justified.However,since this expected benefits and costs helps details may be presented in an guidance makes job creation purely a function of decision-makers organize information attachment to the application if the full the level of expenditure,applicants should also about,and evaluate trade-offs between, analysis cannot be included within the demonstrate how quickly jobs will be created under y the proposed project.Projects that generate a given alternative transportation investments.4 page limit for the project narrative. number of jobs more quickly will have a more Therefore,applicants for TIGER Evaluation of Project Performance: favorable impact on economic recovery.A quarter- Discretionary Grants are generally Each applicant selected for TIGER by-quarter projection of the number of direct job- required to identify,quantify,and Discretionary Grant funding will be hours expected to be created by the project is useful in assessing the impacts of a project on economic required to work with DOT on the Q recovery.Furthermore,applicants should be aware 4 DOT has a responsibility under Executive Order development and implementation of a that certain types of expenditures are less likely to 12893,Principles for Federal Infrastructure plan to collect information and report align well with the Job Creation&Near-Term Investments,59 FR 4233,to base infrastructure Activity criterion.These types of investments on systematic analysis of expected Ori the project's performance with expenditures include,among other things, benefits and costs,including both quantitative and respect to the relevant long-term engineering or design work and purchasing existing qualitative measures. outcomes that are expected to be facilities or right-of-way. Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices 4869 as a matter of policy,and consistent will be spent steadily and expeditiously once An applicant seeking to demonstrate with applicable Federal laws. construction starts;the schedule should timely environmental review and permitting Applicants are encouraged to provide show how many direct,on-project jobs are should submit the information listed below information to assist DOT in assessing expected to be created or sustained during with its application: 1 whether the project will promote the each calendar quarter after the project is a.The information required under Sections O P 1 P underway.Any applicant that is applying for VII(C)(2)(V)and VII(F)–(G)(Contents of creation of job opportunities for low- a TIGER Discretionary Grant and does not Applications)of this notice; income workers through the use of best own all of the property or right-of-way b.Environmental studies or other practice hiring programs and required to complete the project should documents—preferably by way of a Web site apprenticeship(including pre- provide evidence that the property and/or link—that describe in detail known potential apprenticeship)programs;(2)whether right-of-way owner whose permission is project impacts,and possible mitigation for the project will provide maximum required to complete the project supports the those impacts; practicable opportunities for small application and will cooperate in carrying c.A description of completed,or planned P pp out the activities to be supported by the and anticipated coordination with Federal businesses and disadvantaged business TIGER Discretionary Grant; and State regulatory agencies for permits and enterprises,including veteran-owned (ii)Environmental Approvals:Receipt(or approvals; small businesses and service disabled reasonably anticipated receipt)of all d.An estimate of the time required for veteran-owned small businesses; (3) environmental approvals and permits completion of NEPA and all other required whether the project will make effective necessary for the project to proceed to Federal,State or local environmental use of community-based organizations construction on the timeline specified in the approvals;and in connecting disadvantaged workers project schedule and necessary to meet the e.An identification of the proposed NEPA statutory obligation deadline,including class of action(i.e.,Categorical Exclusion, with economic opportunities; (4) satisfaction of all Federal,State and local whether the project will support entities Environmental Assessment,or p J pp requirements and completion of the National Environmental Impact Statement). that have a sound track record on labor Environmental Policy Act("NEPA")process; (iii)Legislative Approvals:Receipt of all practices and compliance with Federal To demonstrate satisfaction of this necessary legislative approvals(for example, laws ensuring that American workers requirement,applicants will be asked to legislative authority to charge user fees or set are safe and treated fairly;and(5) provide assurances with their pre- toll rates),and evidence of support from State whether the project implements best applications and evidence with their and local elected officials;evidence of practices,consistent with our Nation's applications that NEPA review is complete or support from all relevant State and local P substantially complete and submit relevant officials is not required,however,the civil rights and equal opportunity laws, draft or final NEPA documentation— evidence should demonstrate that the project for ensuring that all individuals— evidonde should demonstrate that the project g preferably by way of a Web site link—for is broadly supported; regardless of race,gender,age, DOT review. (iv)State and Local Planning:The disability,and national origin—benefit DOT is unlikely to select a project for planning requirements of the operating from TIGER grant funding. TIGER Discretionary Grant funding if it administration administering the TIGER To the extent possible,applicants involves,or potentially involves,significant project will apply.?Where required by an should indicate whether the environmental impacts and/or is not clearly operating administration,applicants should populations most likely to benefit from likely to complete required environmental demonstrate that a project that is required to the creation or preservation of jobs or and regulatory reviews in time to meet the be included in the relevant State, P jobs obligation deadline of September 30,2013. metropolitan,and local planning documents, new or expanded business opportunities If an applicant has not substantially has been or will be included.One way are from Economically Distressed Areas. completed the NEPA process the applicant applicants may do this is by providing a link In addition,to the extent possible, should provide information on the project's to a Web site showing the planning applicants should indicate whether the current status in the NEPA process and an documents.If the project is not included in project's procurement plan is likely to estimate of the latest date that the NEPA the relevant planning documents at the time process is reasonably expected to be create follow-on jobs and near-term the application is submitted,applicants economic activity for manufacturers and completed.If an applicant has not initiated should submit a certification from the suppliers that support the construction the NEPA process,the applicant must appropriate planning agency that actions are PP PP provide a reasonable justification for why the underway at the time of the application to industry. NEPA process has not yet been initiated as In evaluating a project's alignment of the date of this notice and an assurance with this criterion,DOT will assess that the necessary environmental reviews can 'All regionally significant projects requiring an whether a project is ready to proceed be completed with enough time for any post- action by the FHWA or the plan must be in the metropolitan transportation plan,TIP and STIP. rapidly upon receipt of a TIGER NEPA,pre-obligation activities to be Further,in air quality non-attainment and Discretionary Grant(see Appendix C: completed by June 30,2013,in order to give maintenance areas,all regionally significant Additional Information on Project DOT comfort that all of the TIGER projects,regardless of the funding source,must be Readiness Guidelines for further Discretionary Grant funds are likely to be included in the conforming metropolitan transportation plan and TIP.To the extent a project details),as evidenced by: obligated 1 ,sa in advance dead n of the September 30, p P a j ) 3' 2013,statutory deadline.An example of a is required to be on a metropolitan transportation (i)Project Schedule:Applicants must reasonable justification for why an applicant plan,TIP and/or STIP it will not receive a TIGER include a detailed project schedule in this has not initiated NEPA review would be if, Discretionary Grant until it is included in such section of their application,which should prior to the availability of TIGER plans.Projects not currently included in these plans PP can be amended in by the State and MPO.Projects include major and minor project milestones. Discretionary Grant funds,there was no that are not required to be in long range If the project will be completed in individual reasonable expectation of receiving Federal transportation plans,STIPs and TIPs will not need segments or phases,these segments or phases funding for the project.A project selected for to be included in such plans in order to receive a must be described individually.A feasible award that has not completed the NEPA TIGER Discretionary Grant.Freight and passenger and sufficiently detailed project schedule process may not be permitted to use grant rail projects are not required to be on the State Rail demonstrating that the project can begin funds for construction and related activities Plans called for in the Passenger Rail Investment until NEPA is complete and all other and Improvement Act of 2008.This is consistent construction quickly upon receipt of a TIGER P with the exemption for high speed and intercity Discretionary Grant,6 and that the grant funds necessary environmental approvals have passenger rail projects under the Recovery Act. been received. However,applicants seeking funding for freight and n Each applicant should demonstrate that any passenger rail projects are encouraged to potential grant funding awarded to their project can the September 30,2013,statutory deadline,and that demonstrate that they have done sufficient planning be obligated no later than June 30,2013,in order any unexpected delays will not put TIGER to ensure that projects fit into a prioritized list of to give DOT comfort that the TIGER Discretionary Discretionary Grant funds at risk of expiring before capital needs and are consistent with long-range Grant funds are likely to be obligated in advance of they are obligated. goals. 4870 Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices include the project in the relevant planning agreements signed by the grant other public entities,or private or document; recipients and will be based on critical nonprofit entities,including projects (v) Technical Feasibility:The technical path items identified by applicants in that engage parties that are not feasibility of the project should be response to items(i)through(vi)above. traditionally involved in transportation demonstrated by previously performed and/ or ongoing engineering and design studies DOT expects that pre-conditions be projects,such as nonprofit community and activities;the development of design complete and TIGER Discretionary groups.Pursuant to the OMB Guidance, criteria and/or a basis of design;the basis for Grants funds obligated on or before June DOT will give priority to projects that the cost estimate presented in the TIGER 30,2013,in order to give DOT comfort make effective use of community-based application,including the identification of that all TIGER Discretionary Grant funds organizations in connecting contingency levels appropriate to its level of will be obligated before the statutory disadvantaged people with economic design;and any scope,schedule,and budget deadline of September 30, 2013.By opportunities.Letters of commitment risk-mitigation measures.Applicants must statute,DOT's ability to obligate funds and other supporting documentation include a detailed statement of work that focuses on the technical and engineering for TIGER Discretionary Grants expires showing existing or confirmed aspects of the project.If the project will be on September 30,2013,and DOT has no collaboration,partnerships,etc.,should completed in individual segments or phases, authority to extend the deadline. be provided(preferably through a Web these segments or phases must be described site link)to demonstrate alignment with individually.For projects generating ongoing 2.Secondary Selection Criteria this criterion. operating expenses,an estimate of those (a)Innovation In compliance with the FY 2012 expenses and a basis for the estimate must be Appropriations Act,DOT will give included.Technical feasibility also includes In order to measure a project's priority to projects for which a TIGER the technical capacity of the project sponsor, alignment with this criterion,DOT will Discretionary Grant will help to including a staffing and management plan, assess the extent to which the project complete an overall financing package. demonstrated experience in successfully uses innovative technology(including, An applicant should clearly implementing(on-time and on-budget) for example,intelli intelligent trans ortation similar capital investments,and other p g transportation in the application the indications of sponsor and partner technical systems,dynamic pricing,value extent to which the project cannot be capacity to construct the project;and capture,rail wayside or on board energy readily and efficiently completed (vi)Financial Feasibility:The viability and recovery,smart cards,real-time without Federal assistance,and the completeness of the project's financing dispatching,active traffic management, extent to which other sources of Federal package(assuming the availability of the radio frequency identification(RFID),or assistance are or are not readily requested TIGER Discretionary Grant funds), others)to pursue one or more of the available for the project.DOT will including evidence of stable and reliable long-term outcomes outlined above and/ assess the amount of private debt and capital and(as appropriate)operating or to significantly enhance the equity to be invested in the project or revenue commitments sufficient to cover operational performance of the q y p ) estimated costs;the availability of p p the amount of co-investment from State, contingency reserves should planned capital transportation system.DOT will also local or other non-profit sources. or operating revenue sources not materialize; assess the extent to which the project DOT will also assess the extent to evidence of the financial condition of the incorporates innovations that which the project application project sponsor;and evidence of the grant demonstrate the value of new demonstrates collaboration among recipient's ability to manage grants. approaches to,among other things, neighboring or regional jurisdictions to Applicants must demonstrate financial transportation funding and finance, achieve National,regional or feasibility by including a detailed project contracting,project delivery,congestion metropolitan benefits.Multiple States or budget in this section of their application, safety management,saf management,asset which should include a detailed breakdown g y mana g jurisdictions may submit a joint of how the funds will be spent that provides management,or long-term operations application and should identify a lead estimates—both dollar amount and and maintenance.The applicant should State or jurisdiction as the primary percentage of cost—of how much each clearly demonstrate that the innovation point of contact.Where multiple States activity would cost—e.g.preparation, is designed to pursue one or more of the or jurisdictions are submitting a joint grading,asphalt,etc.If the project will be long-term outcomes outlined above and/ application,the application should completed in individual segments or phases, or significantly enhance the demonstrate how the project costs are a budget for each individual segment or transportation system. apportioned between the States or phase must be included. DOT will consider the extent to which jurisdictions to assist DOT in making DOT reserves the right to revoke any innovative,multi-modal projects might the distributional determinations award of TIGER Discretionary Grant be difficult to fund under other described below in Section III(C) funds and to award such funds to programs and will give priority to (Distribution of Funds). another project to the extent that such projects that align well with the Primary (ii)Disciplinary Integration:In order funds cannot be timely expended and/ Selection Criteria but are unlikely to to demonstrate the value of partnerships or construction does not begin in receive funding under traditional across government agencies that serve accordance with the project schedule. programs. various public service missions and to Because projects have different (b)Partnership promote collaboration on the objectives schedules DOT will consider on a case- outlined in this notice,DOT will give by-case basis how much time after (i)Jurisdictional&Stakeholder priority to projects that are supported, selection for award of a TIGER Collaboration:In order to measure a financially or otherwise,by non- Discretionary Grant each project has project's alignment with this criterion, transportation public agencies that are before funds must be obligated DOT will assess the project's pursuing similar objectives.For (consistent with law)and construction involvement of non-Federal entities and example,DOT will give priority to started through an executed grant the use of non-Federal funds,including transportation projects that are agreement between the selected the scope of involvement and share of coordinated with economic applicant and Cognizant Modal total funding.DOT will give priority to development,housing,water Administration.This deadline will be projects that receive financial infrastructure and land use plans and specified for each TIGER Discretionary commitments from,or otherwise policies;similarly,DOT will give Grant in the project-specific grant involve,State and local governments, priority to transportation projects that Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices 4871 encourage energy efficiency or improve 2.NEPA has been addressed,as evaluation process will require team the environment and are supported by described above in Section II(B)(2)(b)(ii) members to evaluate and rate relevant public agencies with energy or (Environmental Approvals); applications individually before environmental missions.Projects that 3.The project is included in the convening with other members to grow out of a robust planning process— relevant State,metropolitan,and local discuss ratings. such as those conducted with TIGER II planning documents,or will be DOT will not assign specific Planning Grants,the Department of included,if applicable; numerical scores to projects based on Housing and Urban Development's 4.The project expects to be ready to the selection criteria outlined above in Regional Planning Grants,or the obligate all of the TIGER Discretionary Section II(A) (Selection Criteria).Rather, Environmental Protection Agency's Grant funds no later than June 30, ratings of"highly recommended," Brownfield Area-Wide Planning Pilot 2013;8 and "recommended,""acceptable,"or"not Program as well as technical assistance 5.Local matching funds to support 20 recommended"will be assigned to programs focused on livability or percent or more of the costs for the projects for each of the selection criteria. economic development planning—will project are identified and committed in DOT will award TIGER Discretionary also be given priority. applications for projects in urban areas.s Grants to projects that are well-aligned To the extent the pre-application with one or more of the selection III.Evaluation and Selection Process evaluation team determines that a pre- criteria.In addition,DOT will consider A.Evaluation Process application does not satisfy these key whether a project has a negative effect threshold requirements,DOT will on any of the selection criteria,and any TIGER Discretionary Grant inform the project sponsor that an such negative effect may reduce the applications will be evaluated in application for the project will not be likelihood that the project will receive accordance with the below discussed reviewed unless the application a TIGER Discretionary Grant.To the evaluation process.DOT will establish a submitted on or prior to the Application extent the initial evaluation process pre application evaluation team to Deadline can demonstrate that the does not sufficiently differentiate among review each pre application that is requirement has been addressed. highly rated projects,DOT will use a received by DOT on or prior to the Pre- DOT will establish application similar rating process to re-assess the Application Deadline.This evaluation evaluation teams to review each projects that were highly rated and team will be organized and led by the application that is received by DOT identify those that should be most Office of the Secretary and will include Prior to the Application Deadline.These highly rated. members from the relevant modal evaluation teams will be organized and DOT will give more weight to the two administrations in DOT with the most led by the Office of the Secretary and Primary Selection Criteria(Long-Term Near- experience and/or expertise in the will include members from each of the Outcomes and Job Creation&Near- experience and areas(the"Cognizant the Cognizant Modal Administrations. Term Economic Activity),which will be relevant Modal Administrations").ecareas(te This These representatives will include weighted equally,than to the two Modal evaluation is will be responsible for technical and professional staff with Secondary Selection Criteria relevant experience and/or expertise. (Innovation and Partnership)which will analyzing whether the pre-application The evaluation teams will be also be weighted equally.The following satisfies the following key threshold responsible for evaluating and rating all table summarizes the weighting of the requirements: of the projects and making funding selection criteria,as described in the 1.The project is an Eligible Project; recommendations to the Secretary.The preceding paragraphs: Primary Selection Criteria Long-Term Outcomes DOT will give more weight to this criterion than to either of the Secondary Selection Criteria. In addition, this criterion has a minimum threshold requirement. Projects that are unable to demonstrate a likelihood of significant long-term benefits in any of the five long-term outcomes identified in this criterion will not proceed in the evaluation process. Job Creation & Near-Term Eco- DOT will give more weight to this criterion than to either of the Secondary Selection Criteria.This criterion nomic Activity. will be considered after it is determined that a project demonstrates a likelihood of significant long-term benefits in at least one of the five long-term outcomes identified in the long-term outcomes criterion. Secondary Selection Criteria Innovation&Partnership DOT will give less weight to these criteria than to the Primary Selection Criteria. These criteria will be weighted equally. As noted below in Section III(C) will adjust the list of recommended B.Evaluation of Eligibility (Distribution of Funds),upon projects to satisfy the statutory To be selected for a TIGER completion of this competitive rating distributional requirements while Discretionary Grant,a project must be process DOT will analyze the remaining as consistent as possible with an Eligible Project and the applicant preliminary list and determine whether the competitive ratings.The Secretary of must be an Eligible Applicant.DOT may the purely competitive ratings are Transportation will make the final consider one or more components of a consistent with the distributional project selections. large project to be an Eligible Project, requirements of the FY 2012 but only to the extent that the Appropriations Act.If necessary,DOT components have independent utility, s See footnote 7,above. 9 For FHWA and FTA committed funds are obligated for transportation purposes"as described defined as:"Funds that have been dedicated or in 23 CFR 450.104. 4872 Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices meaning the components themselves, be in a rural area if all or the majority Unless otherwise expressly noted not the project of which they are a part, of a project(determined by geographic herein,any and all requirements that are Eligible Projects and satisfy the location(s)where majority of project apply to TIGER Discretionary Grants selection criteria identified above in money is to be spent)is located in a pursuant to the FY 2012 Appropriations Section II(A) (Selection Criteria).For rural area.Therefore,if all or the Act,this notice,or otherwise,apply to these projects,the benefits described in majority of a project is located in a rural TIGER TIFIA Payments. an application must be related to the area,such a project is eligible to apply Pre-Application and Application Cycle components of the project for which for less than$10 million,but at least$1 funding is requested,not the full project million in TIGER Discretionary Grant VII.Pre-Application and Application of which they are a part.DOT will not funds,and up to 100% of the project's Cycle fund individual phases of a project if costs may be paid for with federal A. Two Stages of Application Cycle the benefits of completing only these funds.To the extent more than a de phases would not align well with the minimis portion of a project is located The application cycle for TIGER selection criteria specified in this Notice in an Urbanized Area,applicants should Discretionary Grants has two stages: because the overall project would still identify the estimated percentage of 1.Pre-Application:In Stage 1, be incomplete. project costs that will be spent in applicants must submit a pre- C. Transparency of Process Urbanized Areas and the estimated application form to the DOT.This step In the interest of transparency,DOT percentage that will be spent in rural qualifies applicants to submit an areas. application in Stage 2.No application will disclose as much of the information related to its evaluation process as is VI.TIGER TIFIA Payments submitted during Stage 2 that does not practical and consistent with law.DOT correlate with a properly completed expects that the TIGER Discretionary Up to$175 million of the$500 Stage 1 pre-application will be Grant program may be reviewed and/or million available for TIGER considered. audited by Congress,the i U.S. Discretionary Grants may be used for 2.Application:In Stage 2,applicants Government Accountablity Office, TIGER TIFIA Payments.Applicants must submit a complete application DOT's Inspector General,or others,and seeking TIGER TIFIA Payments should package through Grants.gov.If an has taken,and will continue to take apply in accordance with all of the applicant is seeking a TIGER TIFIA steps to document its decision-making criteria and guidance specified in this payment,applicants must also submit notice for TIGER Discretionary Grant electronically a TIFIA letter of interest process. applications and will be evaluated to the TIFIA office at IV.Grant Administration concurrently with all other applicants. TIFIACredit @dot.gov.TIFIA letters of DOT expects that each TIGER Any applicant seeking a TIGER TIFIA interest must comply with all of the Discretionary Grant will be Payment is also required to submit a program's standard requirements(the administered by one of the Cognizant TIFIA letter of interest concurrent with TIFIA program guide can be Modal Administration,pursuant to a the TIGER TIFIA Payment application, downloaded from http:// grant agreement between the TIGER If selected for a TIGER TIFIA Payment, tifia.fhwa.dot.gov/). Discretionary Grant recipient and the the applicant must comply with all of Pre-applications must be submitted to Cognizant Modal Administration. the TIFIA program's standard DOT by the Pre-Application Deadline, Service Outcome Agreements and application and approval requirements which is February 20,2012,at 5 p.m. Stakeholder Agreements will be including submission of a complete EST.Final applications must be incorporated into the TIGER grant TIFIA application and$50,000 submitted through Grants.gov by the agreements,where appropriate.In application fee(the TIFIA program Application Deadline,which is March accordance with the FY 2012 guide can be downloaded from http:// 19,2012,at 5 p.m.EDT.The DOT pre- Appropriations Act,the Secretary has tifia.fhwa.dot.gov/). application system will open on or the discretion to delegate such Applicants should demonstrate that before February 13,2012,to allow responsibilities to the appropriate the TIFIA loan will be ready to close on prospective applicants to submit pre- operating administration. or before June 30,2013,in accordance applications. Subsequently,the Applicable Federal laws,rules and with the guidance specified above in Grants.gov"Apply"function will open regulations of the Cognizant Modal Section II(B)(1)(b) (Job Creation &Near- on February 22,2012,allowing Administration administering the Term Economic Activity).DOT's TIFIA applicants to submit applications.While project will apply to projects that Joint Program Office will assist DOT in applicants are encouraged to submit receive TIGER Discretionary Grants. determining a project's readiness to pre-applications in advance of the Pre- proceed Projects in Rural Areas proceed rapidly upon receipt of a TIGER Application Deadline,pre-applications I TIFIA Payment. will not be reviewed until after the Pre- The FY 2012 Appropriations Act Applicants seeking TIGER TIFIA Application Deadline. Similarly,while directs that not less than$120 million Payments may also apply for a TIGER applicants are encouraged to submit of the funds provided for TIGER Discretionary Grant for the same project applications in advance of the Discretionary Grants are to be used for and must indicate the type(s)of funding Application Deadline,applications will projects in rural areas.For purposes of for which they are applying clearly on not be evaluated,and selections for this notice,DOT is defining"rural area" the face of their applications.An awards will not be made,until after the as any area not in an Urbanized Area, applicant for a TIGER TIFIA Payment Application Deadline. as such term is defined by the Census must submit an application pursuant to Pre-applications(stage 1)must be Bureau,10 and will consider a project to this notice for a TIGER TIFIA Payment submitted to the DOT.The pre- even if it does not wish to apply for a application form will be available on the "For Census 2000,the Census Bureau defined an TIGER Discretionary Grant. DOT Web site at www.dot.gov/TIGER by Urbanized Area WA)as an area that consists of J anuar y 30,2012,together with densely settled territory that contains 50,000 or more people.Updated lists of UAs are available on will be considered rural areas for purposes of the instructions for submitting the pre- the Census Bureau Web site.Urban Clusters(UCs) TIGER Discretionary Grant program. application form electronically to DOT. Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices 4873 Applications(Stage 2)must be 3.For linear projects on existing To the extent the pre-application does submitted through Grants.gov.To apply roads,route number(Interstate,U.S. not provide adequate assurances for for funding through Grants.gov, Route,or State Route)or road name and items xvii through xxii,DOT will applicants must be properly registered. the latitude and longitude in decimal inform the project sponsor that an Complete instructions on how to degrees to an accuracy of 5 decimal application for the project will not be register and submit applications can be places(e.g.0.12345)of the beginning reviewed unless the application found at www.grants.gov.Please be and ending points of the project; submitted on or prior to the Application aware that the registration process viii.Project title(descriptive); Deadline can demonstrate that each usually takes 2-4 weeks and must be ix.Project type:highway,transit, requirement has been addressed. completed before an application can be freight rail,intercity passenger rail, C. Contents of Applications submitted.If interested parties marine port,multimodal,or bicycle and experience difficulties at any point pedestrian activity(if the project is a An applicant for a TIGER during the registration or application multimodal project,the pre-application Discretionary Grant must include all of process,please call the Grants.gov form will require that applicants the information requested below in its Customer Support Hotline at 1—(800) provide additional information application.DOT reserves the right to 518-4726,Monday-Friday from 7 a.m. identifying the affected modes); ask any applicant to supplement the to 9 p.m.EST.Additional information x.Whether the project is requesting a data in its application,but expects on applying through Grants.gov is TIGER TIFIA Payment; applications to be complete upon available in Appendix B. xi.Project description(describe the submission.To the extent practical, project in plain English,using no more DOT encourages applicants to provide B. Contents of Pre-Applications than 50 words(e.g."the project will data and evidence of project merits in a An applicant for a TIGER replace the existing bridge over the W form that is publicly available or Discretionary Grant should provide all river on interstate-X between the cities verifiable.For TIGER TIFIA Payments, of the information requested below in of Y and Z")do not describe the these requirements apply only to the its pre-application form.DOT reserves project's benefits,background,or applications required under this notice; the right to ask any applicant to alignment with the selection criteria the standard TIFIA letter of interest and supplement the data in its pre- here); loan application requirements, application,but expects pre- xii.Total cost of the project; including the standard$50,000.00 applications to be complete upon xiii.Total amount of TIGER application fee,are separately described submission.Applicants must complete Discretionary Grant funds requested; in the Program Guide and Application the pre application form and send it to xiv.Contact name,phone number, Form found at DOT electronically on or prior to the email address,and physical address for http://tifia.fhwa.dot.gov/. Pre-Application Deadline,in accordance applicant; 1.Standard Form 424,Application for xv.the instructions specified at Congressional districts affected by Federal Assistance pp www.dot.gov/TIGER.The pre- the project; application form must include the xvi.Type of jurisdiction where the Please see www07.grants.gov/assets/ following information: project is located(urban or rural,as SF4247nstructions.pdf for instructions i.Name of applicant(if the defined above in Section V(Projects in on how to complete the SF 424,which application is to be submitted by more Rural Areas)); is part of the standard Grants.gov than one entity,a lead submitted applicant must xvii.Whether or not the project is in submission.Additional clarifying than n onefeed); an Economically Distressed Area,as guidance and FAQs to assist applicants be defined in Section II(A) (Selection in completing the SF-424 will be ii.Applicant's DUNS(Data Universal Criteria); available at www.dot.gov/TIGER by Numbering System)number; xviii.An assurance that the NEPA iii.Type of applicant(State and/or environmental review process is function within in Grants.gov when the"Apply" government,local government,U.S. complete,substantially complete,or in accept within Grann.gov opens to territory,Tribal government,transit p y p accept applications under this notice. y' g progress (and the expected outcome of agency,port authority,metropolitan the process)and is expected to be 2.Project Narrative(Attachment to SF planning organization,or other unit of completed in time to meet the obligation 424) government); deadline of September 30,2013; The project narrative must respond to iv. State(s)where the project is xix.The schedule for completing the application requirements outlined located; right-of-way acquisition and final below.DOT recommends that the v.County(s)where the project is design;approval of plans, project narrative be prepared with located; specifications,and estimates; standard formatting preferences (e.g.a vi.City(s)where the project is located; xx.The date that the project is single-spaced document,using a vii.Information about the geographic expected to be ready for obligation of standard 12-point font,such as Times location of the project for mapping grant funds,which should be no later New Roman,with 1-inch margins). purposes using one of the following than June 30,2013,in order to give DOT A TIGER Discretionary Grant methods: comfort that the funds will be obligated application must include information 1.A geographic information system before they expire on September 30, required for DOT to assess each of the (GIS)file that indicates the location of 2013;and criteria specified in Section II(A) the project; xxi.An assurance that non-Federal (Selection Criteria),as such criteria are 2.For locating point specific projects, matching funds to support 20 percent or explained in Section II(B)(Additional latitude and longitude in decimal more of the costs of the project are Guidance on Selection Criteria). degrees to an accuracy of 5 decimal identified and committed(as noted in Applicants must demonstrate the places (e.g.0.12345)using the WGS 84 Section I(Background),this responsiveness of a project to any datum(the default datum used by requirement does not apply to projects pertinent selection criteria with the Global Positioning System(GPS) located in rural areas,as defined above most relevant information that equipment;or in Section V(Projects in Rural Areas)). applicants can provide,regardless of 4874 Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices whether such information has been a.Long-Term Outcomes form(if necessary)may also be outside specifically requested,or identified,in i.State of Good Repair of the 30-page narrative.Otherwise,the this notice.Applicants should provide ii.Economic Competitiveness only substantive portions of the concrete evidence of project milestones, iii.Livability application that should exceed the 30- iv.Sustainability financial capacity and commitment in v.Safety page limit are any supporting order to support project readiness.Any b.Job Creation&Near-Term Economic documents(including a more detailed such information shall be considered Activity discussion of the benefit-cost analysis) part of the application,not c.Innovation provided to support assertions or supplemental,for purposes of the d.Partnership conclusions made in the 30-page application size limits identified below e.Results of Benefit-Cost Analysis narrative section. in Part D(Length of Applications). V.Project Readiness and NEPA Information provided pursuant to this (information about how ready the project is E. Contact Information to move forward quickly,including paragraph must be quantified,to the information about the project schedule, Contact information is requested as extent possible,to describe the project's environmental approvals,legislative part of the SF-424.DOT will use this benefits to the Nation,a metropolitan approvals,state and local planning,technical information to inform parties of DOT's area,or a region.Information provided feasibility,financial feasibility,and decision regarding selection of projects, pursuant to this paragraph should stakeholder partnerships and implementation as well as to contact parties in the event include projections for both the build agreements); that DOT needs additional information and no-build scenarios for the project VI.Federal Wage Rate Certification(an about an application.Contact for a point in time at least 20 years application must include a certification, information must be provided for a beyond the project's completion date or signed by the applicant,stating that it will direct employee of the lead applicant comply with the requirements of subchapter organization.Contact information for a the lifespan of the project,whichever is IV of chapter 31 of title 40,United States or g closest to the present. Code(Federal wage rate requirements),as contractor,agent,or consultant of the All applications should include a required by the FY 2011 Continuing lead applicant organization is detailed description of the proposed Appropriations Act);and insufficient for DOT's purposes. project and geospatial data for the VII.To the extent relevant,the final page 3' F.National Environmental Policy Act project,including a map of the project's of the application should describe(in one location and its connections to existing made or to the pre-application form. were Requirement Ana )cation for a TIGER transportation infrastructure.An application should also include a The purpose of this recommended Discretionary Grant must detail whether description of how the project addresses format is to ensure that applications are the project will significantly impact the the needs of an urban and/or rural area. provided in a format that clearly natural,social and/or economic An application should clearly describe addresses the application requirements environment.If the NEPA process is the transportation challenges that the and makes critical information readily completed,an applicant must indicate project aims to address,and how the apparent and easy to locate. the date of,and provide a Web site link ro ect will address these challen Length Applications or other reference to,the final P challenges. D j g D.Len h o f A lications The description should include relevant Categorical Exclusion,Finding of No data such as,for example,passenger or The project narrative may not exceed Significant Impact or Record of freight volumes,congestion levels, 30 pages in length.Documentation Decision.If the NEPA process is infrastructure condition,or safety supporting the assertions made in the underway but not complete,the experience. narrative portion may also be provided, application must detail where the DOT recommends that the project but should be limited to relevant project is in the process,indicate the narrative generally adhere to the information.If possible,Web site links anticipated date of completion and following basic outline,and include a to supporting documentation(including provide a Web site link or other table of contents,maps and graphics a more detailed discussion of the reference to copies of any NEPA benefit-cost analysis)should be documents prepared. that make the information easier to P re P review: provided rather than copies of these materials.At the applicant's discretion, G.Environmentally Related Federal, I.Project Description(including relevant materials provided previously State and Local Actions information on the expected users of the to a Cognizant Modal Administration in An application for a TIGER project,a description of the transportation support of a different DOT discretionary Discretionary Grant must indicate challenges that the project aims to address, and how the project will address these program(for example,New Starts or whether the proposed project requires challenges); TIFIA)may be referenced and described actions by other agencies(e.g.,permits), II.Project Parties(information about the as unchanged.To the extent referenced, indicate the status of such actions and grant recipient and other project parties); this information need not be provide a Web site link or other III.Grant Funds and Sources/Uses of resubmitted for the TIGER Discretionary reference to materials submitted to the Project Funds(information about the amount Grant application(although provision of other agencies,and/or demonstrate of grant funding requested,availability/ a Web site link would facilitate DOT's compliance with other Federal,State commitment of funds sources and uses of all consideration of the information).DOT and local regulations as applicable, project funds,total project costs,percentage of project costs that would be paid for with recommends use of appropriately including,but not limited to,Section TIGER Discretionary Grant funds,and the descriptive file names(e.g.,"Project 4(f)Parklands,Recreation Areas, identity and percentage shares of all parties Narrative,""Maps," "Memoranda of Refuges, &Historic Properties;Section providing funds for the project(including Understanding and Letters of Support," 106 Historic and Culturally Significant Federal funds provided under other etc.)for all attachments.Cover pages Properties;Clean Water Act Wetlands programs)); and tables of contents do not count and Water;Executive Orders Wetlands, N.Selection Criteria(information about towards the 30-page limit for the Flood plains,Environmental Justice; how the project aligns with each of the p j primary and secondary selection criteria and narrative portion of the application,and Clean Air Act Air Quality(specifically a description of the results of the benefit-cost the Federal wage rate certification and note if the project is located in a analysis): one-page update of the pre-application nonattainment area);Endangered Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices 4875 Species Act Threatened and Grants cooperate in Departmental efforts United States as a whole are made better off Endangered Biological Resources; to collect and report on information as a result of the project. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery related to the benefits produced by the The best applications are often prepared by Conservation and Management Act projects that receive TIGER transportation agencies that have used in- house Fish Habitat;and/or any State Discretionary Grants. house economic expertise and cost/benefit and local requirements.abita ; analysis to influence the design of the project Because of the limited nature of this from the beginning.All Applicants should H.Protection of Confidential Business program,these benefits are likely to be also consult the BCA Resource Page available Information reported on a project-by-project basis on the USDOT TIGER Web site(http:// All information submitted as part of and trends across projects that were www.dot.gov/TIGER)that will provide P selected for TIGER Discretionary Grants supplemental information,standard or in support of any application shall may not be readily available.In monetized values(where available),and use publicly available data or data that addition,because many of these benefits updates for preparing a BCA.If after reading can be made public and methodologies are long-term outcomes,it may be years this appendix applicants need additional that are accepted by industry practice help,DOT staff are available to answer and standards,to the extent possible.If before the value of the investments can questions and offer technical assistance until the application includes information be quantified and fully reported.DOT is the final application deadline has passed. that the applicant considers to be a trade considering the most appropriate way to This appendix provides general secret or confidential commercial or collect and report information about information and guidance on conducting an financial information,the applicant these potential and actual project analysis.In addition to this guidance, should do the following:(1)Note on the benefits. applicants should refer to OMB Circulars A- 4 and A-94 in preparing their analysis front cover that the submission IX.Questions and Clarifications (http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/). "Contains Confidential Business Circular A-4 also cites textbooks on cost- Information(CBI);" (2)mark each For further information concerning benefit analysis(e.g.,Mishan and Quah 11)if affected page"CBI;"and(3)highlight or this notice please contact the TIGER an applicant wants to review additional otherwise denote the CBI portions.DOT Discretionary Grant program staff via background material. protects such information from email at TIGER Grants@dot.gov,or call In the Executive Summary for any benefit- disclosure to the extent allowed under Howard Hill at(202)366-0301.A TDD cost analysis,applicants should provide a applicable law.In the event DOT is available for individuals who are deaf project matrix describing the project and receives a Freedom of Information Act or hard of hearing at(202) 366-3993. what it changes(see below).This can either (FOIA)request for the information,DOT DOT will regularly post answers to be in Word or in Excel.The first column these questions and other important provides a description of the current th will follow the procedures described in infrastructure baseline(including anticipated clarifications on DOT's Web site at its FOIA regulations at 49 CFR§7.17. changes over the analysis period)and Only information that is ultimately www.dot.gov/TIGER.w.dot.gov/TIGER. identifies the problem that the project will determined to be confidential under that Appendix A:Additional Information on address.The second column describes how procedure will be exempt from Benefit-Cost Analysis the project would change the current disclosure under FOIA. infrastructure baseline.The third and fourth Each applicant should provide evidence columns describe the impact of that change VIII.Project Benefits that the expected benefits of the project and the corresponding population that it DOT expects to identify and report on justify the costs(recognizing that some costs affects.The fifth column identifies the the benefits of the projects that it funds and benefits are difficult to quantify).If it is corresponding societal benefit.The last clear that the benefits do not justify the costs, columns summarize the results and reference with TIGER Discretionary Grants.To the Department will not award a TIGER where in the analysis they calculate the this end,DOT will request that Discretionary Grant to the project.Benefits benefits.The matrix below provides an recipients of TIGER Discretionary include the extent to which residents of the example of a completed matrix. Reduce wait Stop light at lightly time for Number of drivers Estimated dollar used(non-peak)rural Replace with vehicles(non- with reduced wait Monetized value of value of time intersection/excess roundabout/signal peak)&reduce time &number of reduced travel savings,reduced waiting time and phasing accidents accidents/fatalities times,emissions, pollution,and pp.15-18 and safety hazard improvement (peak) &injuries per year and accident costs safety benefits p.19 If an application contains multiple separate In addition to the matrix,the applicant travelers only over the course of five years. projects(but that are linked together in a should summarize all pertinent data and In practice,applicants must estimate both common objective),each of which has quantifiable cost and benefit calculations in benefits and costs for each year after the independent utility,the applicant should a single spreadsheet tab(or table in Word). project's start date and for a period of time provide a separate matrix(and analysis)for It should also summarize all other benefits of at least 20 years in the future(or the each project.The Executive Summary should that are difficult to quantify,and the project's useful life if it is shorter).If the also include the full cost of a project, applicant would also present this at the project will continue to have benefits beyond including Federal,State,local,and private beginning of the BCA.The following funding,as well as expected operations and provides a simplified example for expository the end of the analysis period,applicants can maintenance costs,and not simply the purposes of discounted benefits from a road include a residual value of the project at the requested grant amount or the local amount. project providing travel time savings to local end of the analysis period,and treat that as 11 E.J.Mishan and Euston Quah,Cost-Benefit Analysis,5th edition(New York:Routledge,2007). 4876 Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices an additional benefit,discounted from the end of the analysis period. Total Value of Initial Operations& Calendar Project Affected Travel Time Saved Time Saved Costs Maintenace Costs Undiscounted Net Discounted at Year Year Drivers (hours)1 ($2008)2 ($2005) ($2008)3 Benefits 7% 2011 1 $38,500,000 $6,000,000 -$44,500,000 -$41,588,785 2012 2 80,000 1,040,000 $14,248,000 $700,000 $13,548,000 $11,833,348 2013 3 95,000 1,235,000 $16,919,500 $700,000 $16,219,500 $13,239,943 2014 4 100,000 1,300,000 $17,810,000 $700,000 $17,110,000 $13,053,137 2015 5 102,000 1,326,000 $18,166,200 $700,000 $17,466,200 $12,453,159 2016 6 109,000 1,417,000 $19,412,900 $700,000 $18,712,900 $12,469,195 NPV $21,459,998 1.Number of drivers times three minutes a day(3/60 hours)over 260 workdays 2.Hours at$13.70 per hour($2008) 3.Includes costs from delays to users during construction The following sections will help guide facility,it is unrealistic to assume that,in the Affected Population&Types of Impacts applicants through the matrix.This is useful absence of the project,individuals would Applicants need to carefully identify the both to fill out the matrix(and in the process ship cargo by truck for thousands of miles, different impacts a project will have.For to adequately scope and outline the analysis) whereas they would ship the same cargo by example,the rationale for many highway and to actually carry out the analysis. rail with the project.A realistic description projects is to relieve peak-hour congestion Baselines of current traffic would have current cargo which in turn reduces travel times and traffic going by rail for most of the distance, Applicants should measure costs and and then by truck for the relatively short vehicle emissions.Other highway projects benefits of a proposed project against a distance over which rail transportation is not can improve road safety and in turn reduce baseline(also called a"base case"or a"no available. accidents and corresponding property build"case).The baseline should be an The applicant must make clear exactly damage,injuries,and fatalities.It is assessment of the way the world would look what portions of the project form the basis of important that applicants then match the if the project did not receive the requested the estimates of benefits and costs.It is types of impacts to the corresponding TIGER Discretionary Grant funding. incorrect to claim benefits for the entire affected population(group and number of Sometimes,it is reasonable to forecast that project but only count as costs the costs of affected entities).For example,for a that baseline world resembles the present the portion of the project funded by the passenger project applicants should measure state.However,it is important to factor in TIGER Discretionary Grant.Thus,it would be the number of passengers and for a freight any projected changes(e.g.,baseline incorrect to attribute all the benefits from a project the amount of freight affected. economic growth,increased traffic volumes, new port facility to a TIGER Discretionary Applicants should measure affected or completion of already planned and funded Grant when the costs that are counted only passenger and freight traffic in passenger- projects)that would occur even in the cover the portion of the project funded by the miles and freight ton-miles(and possibly absence of the requested project. TIGER Discretionary Grant,for example, value of freight).If,as is often the case(e.g., Baseline assumptions need to incorporate paving a loading area. projected growth in highway traffic),the the transportation options with the highest There are cases where a grant may net benefits that would be available in the accelerate completion of the project that an affected population is not the same for all absence of the project.Baselines should applicant already was going to build.The years,then the applicant needs to break out incorporate accurate descriptions of current benefits and costs in this case should thus be affected population annually.Measures of traffic/shipping patterns.It is also important limited to the marginal benefits(and freight traffic might include growing levels of that the applicant assume the continuation of marginal costs)of completing the project in port calls.In some cases,the relevant reasonable and sound management practices a shorter period of time and including the population is the volume of traffic that the in establishing a baseline.Assuming a cost of expending resources on the project project diverts from one mode to another. baseline scenario in which the owner of the sooner than otherwise planned(i.e.,a"now Applicants should be realistic as to how the facility does no maintenance on the facility versus later"comparison). project affects these populations. and ignores traffic problems and Alternatives Benefits—Long Term Outcomes maintenance is not realistic and will lead to Ana applicant should present and consider the overstatement of project benefits and will pp p Each application must include in its reasonable alternatives in the analysis. analysis estimates of the project's expected affect the rating of the BOA. Applicants should evaluate smaller-scale and benefits with respect to each of the five long- Applicants must demonstrate that the more focused projects for comparison term outcomes that DOT s ecified in Section proposed project has independent utility. purposes.For example,if an applicant is p II(A)(Selection Criteria).We recognize that it Sub-components of a larger project may have requesting funds to replace a pier,it should little or no transportation value in the also analyze the alternative of rehabilitating may in some cases be unclear in which of absence of the other components.For the current pier.Similarly,if an applicant g these categories of outcomes an applicant example,a ramp to an undeveloped site does seeks funds to establish a relatively large should list a benefit.In these cases,it is less not have much utility if the site does not get streetcar project,it should also evaluate a important in which category an applicant developed.The correct baseline is then the more focused project serving only the more lists a benefit than to make sure that they list current level of traffic and not the projected densely populated corridors of an area.A and measure it(but only once).The following traffic if the site is developed. careful evaluation of the baseline will yield table maps some of the types of benefits to Baselines also need to be realistic in the several alternative actions.The analysis a long-term outcome.These are some of the transportation assumptions that they make.If should demonstrate that the proposed project primary benefit categories,but this is not an a project would construct a short freight rail is the most cost-effective option of all the exhaustive list.We describe these categories spur from a railroad mainline to a particular alternatives considered. later. Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices 4877 Livability Land Use Changes that reduce VMT Accessibility Property Value Increases Economic Competiveness Travel Time Savings Operating Cost Savings Safety Prevented Accidents (property damage), Injuries, and Fatalities State of Good Repair Long-Term Replacement Maintenance & Repair Savings Reduced VMT from not closing bridges. Environmental Sustainability Environmental Benefits from Reduced Emissions Types of Societal Benefits derivation of the travel time savings to the funded by the requested grant.Once the Travel time savings can result from affected population.If travel time savings applicant generates its estimate of hours transportation improvements whose purpose vary over time,the applicant must clearly saved,it should apply the Department's is to expand capacity or improve state of show savings by year.The applicant must guidance on the value of time to those also be careful to estimate savings solely from estimates(http://ostpxweb.dot.gov/policy/ good repair.Where this is the case, the project funded by the requested grant, reports.htm)to monetize them for both applicants should clearly demonstrate the and not from other related projects not business and non-business travelers. Total Annual Hourly Value of Annual Benefit Hours Saved Time Operating cost savings frequently occur generate such benefits.However,applicants emissions and produce Environmental from both freight-related and passenger- must be careful to count the value of the fuel Benefits given reduced idling and otherwise related projects.Freight-related projects that and other operating cost savings(however constant vehicle-miles travelled.Also, improve roads,rails,and ports frequently allocated among carriers,shippers,and transportation projects that encourage generate savings to carriers(e.g.,fuel savings consumers)only once in the benefit-cost transportation users to shift from more- and other operating cost savings)that they analysis;it cannot be re-counted in full each polluting modes to less-polluting modes can may pass on in whole or in part to shippers time it transfers from one group to the other similarly reduce emissions.Applicants by way of lower freight rates.Shippers may, as this would entail double-counting of the claiming these types of benefits must clearly in turn,pass on,in whole or in part,these same benefit. demonstrate and quantify how the project savings to consumers.Passenger-related Transportation can generate environmental will reduce emissions.Once an applicant has projects can also reduce operating costs for costs in the form of emissions of"criteria adequately quantified levels of emission passengers by providing lower-cost pollutants"(e.g.,SO,,,NO,,,and particulates) reductions,it should estimate the dollar alternatives to the use of private vehicles or and from the emission of greenhouse gases, value of these benefits.For sources of by reducing the operating costs of those such as carbon dioxide(CO2).Increased information on the social benefits of reducing vehicles.If applicants are projecting these traffic congestion results in increased levels criteria pollutant emissions,applicants savings as benefits,they need to carefully of these emissions.Transportation projects should refer to the online BCA Resource Page demonstrate how the proposed project would that reduce congestion can reduce these (http://www.dot.gov/TIGER). Total Annual Value of Annual Benefit Emission- Pollutant(e.g. Reduction ==> CO2) Many infrastructure projects that improve infrastructure is out of service due to the state of good repair,applicants should the state of good repair of transportation maintenance and repairs,or may prevent a provide accepted measures for assessing an infrastructure can reduce long-term facility(such as a bridge)from being removed asset's current condition.For example, maintenance and repair costs.These benefits from service entirely.The application should applicants can use Present Serviceability are in addition to the benefits of reductions also consider differences in maintenance and Ratings(PSR)or the International Roughness in travel time,shipping costs,and crashes repair costs when comparing different project Index to discuss pavement condition and which the applicant should account for alternatives.For example,an applicant can bridge sufficiency ratings to discuss the separately.Applicants should include these compare the maintenance costs that would be condition of a bridge.As discussed in the maintenance and repair savings as benefits. required after rehabilitating an existing pier section on costs,the Department expects Improving state of good repair may also with those that would be required after p p reduce operating costs and congestion by building a new one.As part of the data that applicants to consider the life-cycle costs of the project when making these comparisons. reducing the amount of time that the go into estimating the benefits of improving 4878 Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices Projects can also improve the Safety of crashes to show the extent to which the type provide a clear analysis of why the forecasted transportation.A well-designed project can of improvements proposed would actually modal diversion will take place.Once the reduce fatalities and injuries as well as reduce the likelihood of the kinds of crashes applicant has established a reasonable count reduce other crash costs.The applicant that actually had occurred.Alternatively, of the incidents that the project will likely should clearly demonstrate how the project when only a few cases are involved,the prevent,it should apply the Department's will improve safety.For example,to claim a applicant should provide a description of the guidance on value of life and injuries(http:// reduction in fatalities,an applicant must incidents and demonstrate the linkage clearly demonstrate how the existence of the between the proposed project and crash ostpxweb.dot.gov/policy/reports.htm)to project would have prevented the types of reduction.In some cases,safety benefits may monetize them.This and other relevant fatalities that commonly occur in that area. occur because of modal diversion from a less information on Abbreviated Injury Scale Applicants should use crash causation safe mode to a safer mode.When applicants (AIS)are available at the BCA Resource Page factors or similar analyses of causes of claim this type of benefit,they should (http://www.dot.gov/TIGER). Total Annual Value of Annual Benefit Reduction in Statistical Life Fatalities Applicants must carefully net out other Other costs of the project,along with capital costs. effects before taking benefits from Property Transfers are not benefits.Analysis should In addition to construction costs,other direct Value Increases(e.g.from a transit station). distinguish between real benefits and transfer costs may include design and land For example,if the property value goes up by payments.Benefits reflect real resource usage acquisition.If the time period considered in the exact same value as the developer's and overall benefits to society,while the analysis is long enough to require the investment then this is not a benefit.Property transfers represent payments by one group to rehabilitation of the facility during the period value increases over and above the another and do not represent a net increase of analysis,then the costs of that developer's investment may potentially be a in societal benefits.In the case of job rehabilitation should be included.Applicants benefit from the project.The analysis should creation,for example,every job represents should consider external costs,such as noise, also consider to what extent an increase in both a cost to the employer(paying a wage) increased congestion,and environmental land values induced by the project in one and a benefit to the employee(receiving a pollutants resulting from the use of the area causes a reduction in land values in wage),so it is a transfer payment,rather than facility or related changes in usage on other some other area.Applicants must also net out a net benefit.While wages are a transfer facilities in the same network in the analysis. any property value increases that result from payment,increases in the productivity of the Additionally,applicants should include,to time savings or other benefits that have labor force,measured by increases in how the extent possible,costs to users during already been counted.Applicants can only much workers produce per hour,can be construction,such as delays and increased count the net increase in land value as a included as a benefit of the project,but these vehicle operating costs associated with work benefit.Simply asserting that there is a P 1 zones or detours.The applicant should property tax increase net of time savings is benefits must be carefully measured and correctly discount annual costs to arrive at a inadequate.The Department expects any justified to be included.With respect to Y applicant claiming these types of benefits to economic development,providing estimates present value of the project's cost. of capital investments or property tax Applicants should discount future benefits provide a rigorous justification of the benefit. revenues are not legitimate benefits in a and costs to present values using a real Applicants should note that any claimed benefit-cost analysis.s.For example,while the discount rate(i.e.,a discount rate that reflects societal benefit from a property value Y P the opportunity cost of money net of the rate increase is only a one-time stock benefit. tax is a benefit to the tax assessor it is a cost PP Y Y to the taxpayer.These transfers are of inflation)of 7 percent,following guidance Applicants can not treat it as a stream of commonly included in"economic impact provided by OMB in Circulars A-4 and A— benefits accruing annually.To the extent Y P possible,applicant should use survey analyses;"an economic impact analysis is 94(http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/ methods to estimate the value of the estimate not acceptable as a substitute for a benefit- circulars_default/).Applicants may also the value of the expected property value cost analysis.Other examples of transfers provide an alternative analysis using a real increase from transit or other transportation include port/rail projects whose purpose is to discount rate of 3 percent.They should use improvements. take away business from competitors. the latter approach when the alternative use Transit and bicycle paths may provide However,the transportation cost savings(if of funds currently dedicated to the project greater accessibility to alternative any)and the like from shifting traffic to a would be for other public expenditures, transportation modes,but they will not more convenient location would be a benefit. rather than private investment.In presenting actually enhance livability unless people use Applicants should not include employment these year-by-year streams,applicants should them,and the desire to use them will depend or output multipliers that purport to measure measure them in constant(or"real")dollars secondary effects as societal benefits because prior to discounting.Applicants should not in part on where these modes go and on the amenities provided with them.One useful these secondary effects are generally the add in the effects of inflation to the estimates source of guidance on measuring benefits of same(per dollar spent)regardless of what of future benefits and costs prior to bicycle facilities(particularly for kind of project is funded. discounting. understanding demand estimation)is the As noted above,the estimate of Costs must Benefit-cost analyses of transportation Transportation Research Board's National pertain to the same project as the estimate of projects almost always depend on forecasts Cooperative Highway Research Program benefits.If the TIGER Discretionary Grant is of projected levels of usage(road traffic,port Report 552,Guidelines for Analysis of to pay for only part of the project,but the calls,etc.).When an applicant is using such Investments in Bicycle Facilities project is indivisible(i.e.,no one part of the forecasts to generate benefit estimates,it (Washington:TRB,2006) project would have independent utility),then must assess the reliability of these forecasts. (Available at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/ the applicant should compare the benefits of If the applicant is using outside forecasts,it onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_552.pdf). the whole project to the costs of the whole must provide a citation and an appropriate Transit and bicycle paths can also induce project,including costs paid for by State, page number for the forecasts.Applicants land use changes that result in greater local,and private partners other than the should incorporate indirect effects into their density of development and more mixed-use Federal government.In general,applicants forecasts where possible(e.g.,induced development,thus reducing the number of should use a life-cycle cost analysis approach demand).Applicants should also take great passenger-miles of transportation needed to in estimating the costs of the project.The care to match forecasts of usage levels to the access jobs,schools,shopping,and Department expects applicants to include corresponding year.For example,using recreational opportunities. operating,maintenance,and other life-cycle projected traffic levels for 2030 to generate Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices 4879 benefits for all the earlier years is incorrect. 1.Acquire a DUNS Number.A DUNS urged to submit your application at least 72 For more information on forecasting, number is required for Grants.gov hours prior to the due date of the application applicants can refer to the forecasting section registration.The Office of Management and to allow time to receive the validation of FHWA's Economic Analysis Primer Budget requires that all businesses and message and to correct any problems that (http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/ nonprofit applicants for Federal funds may have caused a rejection notification. asstmgmt/primer06.cfm).While produced for include a DUNS(Data Universal Numbering Note:When uploading attachments please analysis of highway projects,the primer is a System)number in their applications for a use generally accepted formats such as.pdf, good source of information on issues related new award or renewal of an existing award. .doc,and.xls.While you may imbed picture to all transportation forecasting. A DUNS number is a unique nine-digit files such as.jpg,.gif,.bmp,in your files, Applicants should make every effort to sequence recognized as the universal please do not save and submit the attachment make the results of their analyses as standard for identifying and keeping track of in these formats.Additionally,the following transparent and reproducible as possible.A entities receiving Federal funds.The formats will not be accepted:.com,.bat,.exe, Department reviewer reading the analysis identifier is used for tracking purposes and .vbs,.cfg,.dat,.db,.dbf,.dll,.ini,.log,.ora, should be able to understand the basic to validate address and point of contact .sys,and.zip. elements of the analysis and the way in information for Federal assistance applicants, which the applicant derived the estimates.It recipients,and sub-recipients.The DUNS Experiencing Unforeseen Grants.gov is inadequate for the applicant only to number will be used throughout the grant life Technical Issues provide links to large documents or cycle.Obtaining a DUNS number is a free, If you experience unforeseen Grants.gov spreadsheets as sources.The Department one-time activity.Obtain a DUNS number by technical issues beyond your control that expects applicants to clearly cite all outside calling 1-(866)705-5711 or by applying prevent you from submitting your data sources with the corresponding page online at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. application by the deadline of March 19, number(or cell number,for a spreadsheet). 2.Acquire or Renew Registration with the 2012,at 5 p.m.EDT,you must contact For more detailed documentation,applicants Central Contractor Registration(CCR) TIGERGrants@dot.gov or Howard Hill at must include a thorough verbal description Database.All applicants for Federal financial (202)366-0301 within the 24 hours of how they did the calculation.This should assistance maintain current registrations in following the deadline and request approval include spreadsheet.references to tabs description and ls in the should the Central Contractor Registration(CCR) to submit your application after the deadline ser include specific sources for all the numbers should database.An applicant must be registered in has passed.At that time,DOT staff will in the spreadsheet(i.e.those that the the CCR to successfully register in require you to provide your DUNS number Grants.gov.The CCR database is the and your Grants.gov Help Desk tracking itself does not calculate).If an Y g p g applicant uses a"pre-packaged"economic repository for standard information about number(s).After DOT staff review all of the model to calculate net benefits,the applicant Federal financial assistance applicants, information submitted and contact the should provide annual benefits and costs by recipients,and sub-recipients.Organizations Grants.gov Help Desk to validate the benefit and cost type for the entire analysisy that have previously submitted applications technical issues you reported,DOT staff will period(including forecast year traffic via Grants.gov are already registered with contact you to either approve or deny your volumes).In any case,applicants must CCR,as it is a requirement for Grants.gov request to submit a late application through provide a detailed explanation of the registration.Please note,however,that Grants.gov.If the technical issues you assumptions used to run the model(e.g., applicants must update or renew their CCR reported cannot be validated,your peak traffic hours and traffic volume during registration at least once per year to maintain application will be rejected as untimely. peak hours,mix of traffic by cars,buses,and an active status,so it is critical to check To ensure a fair competition for limited trucks,etc.).The applicant must provide registration status well in advance of relevant discretionary funds,the following conditions enough information so that a Department application deadlines.Information about are not valid reasons to permit late reviewer can follow the general logic of the CCR registration procedures can be accessed submissions:(1)Failure to complete the estimates(and,in the case of spreadsheet at www.ccr.gov. registration process before the deadline date; models,reproduce them). 3.Acquire an Authorized Organization (2)failure to follow Grants.gov instructions Representative(AOR)and a Grants.gov on how to register and apply as posted on its Appendix B:Additional Information on Username and Password.Complete your Web site;(3)failure to follow all of the Applying Through Grants.gov AOR profile on Grants.gov and create your instructions in the funding availability Applications(Stage 2)for TIGER username and password.You will need to notice;and(4)technical issues experienced Discretionary Grants must be submitted use your organization's DUNS Number to with the applicant's computer or information through Grants.gov.To apply for funding complete this step.For more information technology(IT)environment. through Grants.gov,applicants must be about the registration process,go to Appendix C:Additional Information on properly registered.Complete instructions on ivy'w•grants.gov/applicants/ PP how to register and apply can be found at get_registered.jsp. Project Readiness Guidelines www.grants.gov.If interested parties 4.Acquire Authorization for your AOR As applicants develop their applications, experience difficulties at any point during from the E-Business Point of Contact(E-Biz there are some guidelines on project registration or application process,please POC).The E-Biz POC at your organization readiness that they should consider.The call the Grants.gov Customer Support Hotline must log in to Grants.gov to confirm you as TIGER Discretionary Grant funds are at 1(800)518-4726,Monday—Friday from 7 an AOR.Please note that there can be more available for a limited period of time(DOT's a.m.to 9 p.m.EST. than one AOR for your organization. ability to obligate the funds expires after Registering with Grants.gov is a one-time 5.Search for the Funding Opportunity on September 30,2013),and DOT may be process;however,processing delays may Grants.gov.Please use the following limited as to when they may obligate the occur and it can take up to several weeks for identifying information when searching for TIGER Discretionary Grant funds to a project first-time registrants to receive confirmation the TIGER funding opportunity on if it is not far enough along in the project and a user password.It is highly Grants.gov.The Catalog of Federal Domestic development process.The application recommended that applicants start the Assistance(CFDA)number for this package should provide concrete evidence of registration process as early as possible to solicitation is 20.933,titled National project milestones,financial capacity and prevent delays that may preclude submitting Infrastructure Investments. commitment in order to support project an application by the deadlines specified. 6.Submit an Application Addressing All of readiness.Each operating administration Applications will not be accepted after the the Requirements Outlined in this Funding with the responsibility for obligating the relevant due date;delayed registration is not Availability Announcement.Within 24-48 TIGER Discretionary Grant funds has its own an acceptable reason for extensions.In order hours after submitting your electronic regulations,policies,and procedures that to apply for TIGER Discretionary Grant application,you should receive an email they may apply for projects that have been funding under this announcement and to validation message from Grants.gov.The selected for TIGER Discretionary Grant funds. apply for funding through Grants.gov,all validation message will tell you whether the In some cases,an operating administration applicants are required to complete the application has been received and validated may obligate a portion of the overall amount following: or rejected,with an explanation.You are of funds that an applicant has been selected 4880 Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 20/Tuesday, January 31, 2012/Notices to receive so that such an applicant may use funds for construction or other activities is construction or other activities by an that portion of the TIGER Discretionary Grant contingent on the project being included in operating administration may be contingent funds for eligible pre-construction activities, the relevant planning documents,applicants on completion of right-of-way acquisition delaying the balance of the obligation of should demonstrate they can reasonably and final design approval,and/or additional funds until all pre-construction requirements expect to have the project included in such approvals contingent on completion of right- have been completed. planning documents by March 30,2013.DOT of-way acquisition and design,applicants The guidelines below provide additional is using the March 30 milestone since should demonstrate,through their project details about some of these pre-construction applicants should demonstrate in their schedule,that they reasonably expect to have steps if a project element is for pre- project schedule that all additional, right-of-way and design completed,and construction activities,or requirements necessary pre-construction steps if a project completion of any other needed pre- before the total award is obligated(including, element is for pre-construction activities,or construction steps if a project element is for but not limited to,planning requirements, requirements before the total award is pre-construction activities,or other approvals environmental approvals,right-of-way obligated will be complete on or before June by June 30,2013.Applicants should submit acquisitions,and design completion)and 30,2013,and planning must be complete a reasonable schedule of when right-of-way suggests milestones each project should aim before other pre-construction or other (if applicable),design,and any other required to achieve in order to obligate the full activities can be completed..The applicant approvals are expected to be obtained. amount of awarded TIGER Discretionary should provide a schedule demonstrating Applicants may expect that DOT may Grant funds,in advance of the obligation when the project will be added to the obligate TIGER funds for right-of-way and deadline of September 30,2013.Applicants relevant planning documents. design completion only after planning and should demonstrate that they can reasonably Environmental Approvals:Projects should environmental approvals are obtained. expect to complete all of these pre- have received all environmental approvals, Completion of Obligation:Applicants construction steps if a project element is for including satisfaction of all Federal,State should plan to have all necessary pre- pre-construction activities,or requirements and local requirements and completion of the construction or other approvals and activities before the total award is obligated no later National Environmental Policy Act("NEPA") completed by June 30,2013.In some than June 30,2013,so that all the TIGER process at the time the application is instances,DOT may not obligate for Discretionary Grant funds are obligated in submitted or should demonstrate,through construction or other activities until all advance of or b the September 30,2013, their project schedule and narrative,that Y P planning and environmental approvals are statutory deadline,and that any unexpected receipt of NEPA approval,and all additional, obtained and right-of-way and final design delays will not put TIGER Discretionary necessary pre-construction steps if a project are complete.If a project is selected for a Grant funds at risk of expiring before they element is for pre-construction activities,or TIGER Discretionary Grant and the TIGER can be fully obligated.DOT may reallocate other approvals can occur by June 30,2013. Discretionary Grant funding will be used to unobligated TIGER Discretionary Grant funds If the obligation of TIGER Discretionary complete all of these activities,DOT may Grant funds for construction or other towards projects that are ready to use TIGER obligate the funding in phases,in accordance Discretionary Grant funds if a project is not activities is contingent on completion of with the laws,regulations,and policies of the other approvals that can only take place after ready for DOT to obligate all TIGER the environmental approvals process,the operating administration that is Discretionary Grant funds before the administering the grant. September 30,2013,statutory deadline. applicant should demonstrate,through their Applicants that are unfamiliar with,or have project schedule and narrative,that they can Issued on:January 25,2012. questions about,the requirements that a reasonably expect to obtain all environmental Ray LaHood, proposed project or projects may need to approvals by March 30,2013,or other date Secretary. com lete in order for the o eratin sufficiently in advance of June 30,2013.Like P P g planning,the environmental approvals must [FR Doc.2012-1996 Filed 1-30-12;8:45 am] administration to obligate TIGER be obtained prior to completing other pre- BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P Discretionary Grant funds may contact construction steps if a project element is for TIGERGrants@dot.gov with questions.The pre-construction activities,or other activities. below information is not an exhaustive list of To demonstrate that this suggested DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION the requirements that a project may need to milestone is achievable,applicants should comply with in order for TIGER provide information about the anticipated Federal Highway Administration Discretionary Grant funds to be obligated by class of action,the budget for completing the operating administration that is NEPA,including hiring a consultant if [FHWA Docket No.FHWA-2011-0122] administering the TIGER Discretionary Grant. necessary,and a schedule that demonstrates State and Local Planning:Project activities when NEPA will be complete.The schedule Revision of Form FHWA-1273 that are focused on refining scope and should show how the suggested milestones AGENCY:Federal Hi hwa completing Federal environmental reviews described in this section will be complied g y are eligible capital expenses under the TIGER with,and include any anticipated Administration(FHWA),DOT. Discretionary Grants Program and are an coordination with Federal and State ACTION:Notice;request for comments. essential part of project development.A regulatory agencies for permits and project that receives TIGER Discretionary approvals.The budget should demonstrate SUMMARY:The FHWA is requesting Grant funds may be required to be approved how costs to complete NEPA factor into the comments on a proposed revision of by the Metropolitan Planning Organization or overall cost to complete the project.The form FHWA-1273—"Required Contract State in the Long Range Plans and budget and schedule for completing NEPA Provisions Federal-Aid Construction Transportation Improvement Program(TIP)/ should be reasonable and be comparable to Contracts."This form includes certain Statewide Transportation Improvement a budget and schedule of a typical project of contract provisions that are required on to (Sh tP).Applicants f nts should included take steps the same type.The applicant should provide all Federal-aid construction projects. P project P 1 q the NEPA froc support from State and to local The revisions are necessary to provide the relevant plan if the project is required to be included in such planning documents elected officials as well as the public. consistency with the current policies of before an operating administration may Additionally,the applicant should provide the FHWA and other Federal agencies. obligate funds to the project. environmental studies or other documents DATES: Comments must be received on If the project is not included in the relevant (preferably by way of a Web site link)that or before March 1,2012. planning documents at the time the TIGER describe in detail known potential project ADDRESSES:Mail or hand deliver application is submitted,applicants should impacts and possible mitigation for these comments to the U.S.Department of submit a certification from the appropriate impacts.The applicant should supply p planning agency that actions are underway at sufficient documentation for DOT to Transportation,Dockets Management the time of application to include the project adequately review the project's NEPA status. Facility, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., in the relevant planning document.If the Right-of-Way and Design:If the obligation Washington,DC 20590,or submit obligation of TIGER Discretionary Grant of TIGER Discretionary Grant funds for electronically at www.regulations.gov or