Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout12-8409 Sierra Little Ones Daycare Sponsored by: City Manager Resolution No. 12-8409 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA, TO APPROVE THE REQUEST OF O&E EAST COAST INVESTMENT AIXA SIERRA LITTLE ONES ACADEMY FOR A CONDITIONAL USE TO OPERATE A CHILD DAY CARE CENTER,AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2527 OPA-LOCKA BOULEVARD, IN THE B-1 ZONING DISTRICT,FOLIO(S)08-2122-011-0420, 08-2122-011-0430, 08-2122-011-0440, AND 08-2122-011-0410; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF RECITALS; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS,an application was submitted on May 27,2011 by Aixa Serra with Little Ones Academy Corporation to operate a child care center,on property currently zoned B-1 (Commercial Neighborhood); and WHEREAS, daycare and nurseries are authorized under City Ordinance No. 86-8,but are subject to conditional use upon approval of the City Commission of the City of Opa-locka. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 071211-1, the Planning Council approved Aixa Sierra Little Ones Academy request for the operation of a child care center; and WHEREAS,the City Commission remanded it back to Planning Council in September 2011 to address parking and playground requirements; and WHEREAS, in December 2011, the applicant requested reconsideration and provided a complete professional site plan for conditional use to operate a child day care center; and WHEREAS,the Planning Council did a formal review of applicant's request in March 2012, and subsequently recommended approval, subject to the conditions of Ordinance 86-8 Section 5.4.; and Resolution No. 12-8409 WHEREAS,the City Commission of the City of Opa-locka desires to approve the request of O&E East Coast Investment Aixa Sierra Little Ones Academy for a conditional use to operate a child day care center in the B-1 zoning district. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals to the preamble herein are incorporated by reference. Section 2. The City Commission of the City of Opa-locka hereby approves the request of O&E East Coast Investment Aixa Sierra Little Ones Academy to allow a conditional use for a child day care center, at the property located at 2527 Opa-Locka Boulevard, in the B-1 Zoning District, Folio(S) 08-2122-011-0420, 08-2122-011-0430, 08-2122-011-0440, and 08-2122-011-0410. Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of April, 2012 YRA YLOR MAYOR Attest to: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ri diannaFlores Joss. r . t-'ler I terim City Clerk C' , Atto •y Moved by: VICE MAYOR JOHNSON Seconded by: COMMISSIONER HOLMES Commission Vote: 5-0 Commissioner Holmes: YES Commissioner Miller: YES Commissioner Tydus: YES Vice-Mayor Johnson: YES Mayor Taylor: YES oQp-LOCka O,' p 0 ORAtE City of Opa-Locka Agenda Cover Memo Commission Meeting April 11,2012 Item Type: Resolution Ordinance Other Date: X (EnterXin box) Fiscal Impact: Ordinance Reading: 1st Reading 2nd Reading (EnterXin box) Yes No (EnterXin box) N/A X Public Hearing: Yes No Yes No (EnterXin box) X X Funding Source: (Enter Fund&Dept) Advertising Requirement: Yes No (Enter Acct No.) N/A (EnterXin box) X N/A Contract/P.O.Required: Yes No RFP/RFQ/Bid#: (EnterXin box) X N/A Strategic Plan Related Yes No Strategic Plan Priority Area: Strategic Plan Obj./Strategy: (list the (EnterXin box) X specific objective/strategy this item will address) Enhance Organizational 0 Bus.&Economic Dev • Public Safety Quality of Education El Qual.of Life&City Image 0 Communcation El - Sponsor Name City Manager Department: Community Development Short Title: A resolution of the City Commission to grant a conditional use for a child day care center in the B-1 zoning district to 0 & E East Coast Investments, LLC. Staff Summary: The applicant, Aixa Serra with Little Ones Academy Corporation, submitted their application on May 27, 2011 to obtain conditional use approval to operate a day care facility at 2527 Opa-locka, Boulevard, Opa-locka, FL. The subject property is currently zoned B-1 (Commercial Neighborhood). Daycare and other Nursery Facilities are authorized under city ordinance no. 86-8 but with conditional use approval from the Mayor and City Commission. The application was heard by the Planning Council on July 12, 2011 and received a recommendation for approval, subject to meeting certain off-street parking and playground requirements. This item was forwarded to the City Commission for final review. On September 28, 2011,the Mayor and City Commission heard this item and remanded it back to the Planning Council to review the off-street parking and playground requirements. On December 6, 2011, the Planning Council heard this matter as directed by the City Commission. At the December 6, 2011 meeting, the applicant appeared before the Planning Council stating she was not properly informed of the city commission meeting on September 28, 2011 and she did not know what was occurring with her application until November 16, 2011. The applicant stated that had she known that an adequate site plan depicting off-street parking was needed she could have presented a suitable site plan to the Planning Council as indicated by the Mayor and City Commission. The Planning Council recommended denial of this application based on not having an adequate site plan and forwarded this matter to the City Commission for final action. Community Development Department staff met with the applicant on December 7, 2011 to discuss her request that her application be re-considered by the Planning Council with a complete site plan prior to the matter being presented to the Mayor and City Commission. On December 13, 2011, the applicant presented 15 copies of the new and corrected site plan. On December 27, 2012, the applicant presented a written request for reconsideration by the Planning Council for a conditional use to operate a child day care center. On February 7, 2012, this request was presented to the Planning Council to discuss formal review of the additional information in light of the previous recommendation for approval and later a denial recommendation. This request was formally reviewed by the Planning Council on March 6, 2012 and the Planning Council recommended approval of the applicant's request to operate a child day care center subject to the conditions of Ordinance 86-8 Section 5.4 Proposed Action: Staff recommends approval of this request subject to the conditions of Ordinance 86-8 Section 5.4 Attachment: Ordinance 86-8 Section 5.4 Planning Council Meeting Minutes, December 6, 2011; March 6, 2011 Planning Council Application Staff Report Di \c.'0\ F' 4 D 0l ‘\', �4•!' N \4POgAT" / Memorandum TO: Myra L. Taylor, Mayor Dorothy Johnson, Vice Mayor Timothy Holmes, Commissioner Rose Tydus, Commissioner Gail Miller, Commissioner FROM: Bryan Finnie, Cit ei----- DATE: March 3 , 2012 RE: Request from Aixa Serra, applicant, for conditional use in the B-1 (Commercial Neighborhood) zoning district to allow a child day care use. The subject property is located at 2527 Opa-locka Boulevard, Opa-locka, FL specifically described by Folio(s) 08-2122-011-0420; 08-2122-011-0430; 08-2122-011-0440; 08-2122-011-0410 and contains 34,452 square feet. Request: A resolution of the City Commission to grant a conditional use for a child day care center by the applicant, Aixa Serra, Little Ones Academy Corporation to operate a child day care facility subject to conditions stated in ordinance no. 86-8; providing for incorporation of recitals; providing for an effective date. Chronology: • On July 12, 2011, the applicant came before the Planning Council and received tentative approval to operate a child day care center subject to meeting the parking and playground requirements. • On September 28, 2011, this item appeared before the Mayor and City Commission. At this meeting, the item was remanded back to the Planning Council to further address the parking and playground requirements. • On December 6, 2011, this item re-appeared before the Planning Council. At issue was the number of off-street parking spaces and playground area required for the site to allow for the legal operation of a daycare center. • During the meeting, the applicant stated she had not received notice of the September 28, 2011 City Commission meeting and would have corrected any shortcomings on the site plan prior to the December 6, 2011 Planning Council meeting had she known there was an issue with the site plan. • On December 6, 2011 the Planning Council considered the application incomplete because there was no site plan to review. During that meeting, the Planning Council considered the fact that only four (4) parking spaces were required and while there was adequate off-street parking, the application could not receive a recommendation of approval due to the site plan not being complete. Subsequently, the application was denied by the Planning Council. • On December 7, 2011, after the Planning Council meeting, the Community Development Department staff met with Ms. Aixa Serra, the applicant for the child day care center. Ms. Serra requested that her application be re-considered by the Planning Council with a complete site plan prior to the matter being presented to the Mayor and City Commission because according to the applicant, they never received notice of the Sep. 28th City Commission meeting and poor communication from the administration has created this issue. • Community Development staff advised her to provide an adequate site plan so we can present this matter to the City Commission with a recommendation from staff based on a suitable site plan. • On December 13, 2011, the applicant presented 15 copies of the new and corrected site plan. On December 27, 2012, the applicant presented a written request for reconsideration by the Planning Council for a conditional use to operate a child day care center. • On February 7, 2012, this request was presented to the Planning Council to discuss formal review of the additional information in light of the previous recommendation for approval and the subsequent denial recommendation. This request was formally reviewed on March 6, 2012 and the Planning Council recommended approval of the applicant's request to operate a child day care center subject to the conditions of Ordinance 86-8 Section 5.4. Description: The applicant, Aixa Serra with Little Ones Academy Corporation, submitted their application on May 27, 2011 to obtain conditional use approval to operate a daycare facility at 2527 Opa-locka Boulevard, Opa-locka, FL. The subject property is currently zoned B-1 (Commercial Neighborhood). Daycare and other Nursery Facilities are authorized under city ordinance no. 86-8 but with conditional use approval from the Mayor and City Commission. The application was heard by the Planning Council on July 12, 2011 and received a recommendation for approval, subject to meeting certain off-street parking and playground requirements. At that time, this item was forwarded to the City Commission for final review. On September 28, 2011, the Mayor and City Commission heard this item and remanded it back to the Planning Council to review the off-street parking and playground requirements. On November 16, 2011, the applicant contacted the Community Development Department and informed that the item was heard by the City Commission and remanded back to the Planning Council for the review of off-street parking and playground requirements. On December 6, 2011, the Planning Council heard this matter as directed by the City Commission. At the December 6, 2011 meeting, the applicant appeared before the Planning Council stating she was not properly informed of the city commission meeting on September 28, 2011 and she did not know what was occurring with her application until November 16, 2011. The applicant stated that had she known that an adequate site plan depicting off-street parking was needed she could have presented a suitable site plan to the Planning Council as indicated by the Mayor and City Commission. The Planning Council recommended denial of this application based on not having an adequate site plan and forwarded this matter to the City Commission for final action. Community Development Department staff met with the applicant on December 7, 2011 to discuss her request that her application be re-considered by the Planning Council with a complete site plan prior to the matter being presented to the Mayor and City Commission. According to the applicant, they never received notice of the Sep. 28t City Commission meeting and poor communication from the administration has created this issue. Community Development staff advised her to provide an adequate site plan so we can present this matter to the City Commission with a recommendation from staff based on a suitable site plan. On December 13, 2011, the applicant presented 15 copies of the new and corrected site plan. On December 27, 2012, the applicant presented a written request for reconsideration by the Planning Council for a conditional use to operate a child day care center. On February 7, 2012, this request was presented to the Planning Council to discuss formal review of the additional information in light of the previous recommendation for approval and later a denial recommendation. This request was formally reviewed by the Planning Council on March 6, 2012 and the Planning Council recommended approval of the applicant's request to operate a child day care center subject to the conditions of Ordinance 86-8 Section 5.4. Financial Impact: There are no indirect costs to the city for the approval of this use other than for ordinary expenses incurred for facilitating the application process. The City would receive occupational taxes, building permits, and annual license fees for this use if approved. Implementation Time Line: Immediately Legislative History: Ordinance No. 86-8 Planning Council Recommendation: Planning Council recommended approval of this request to operate the daycare center based on Ordinance 86-8 section 5.4. Staff Recommendation: At this time, staff recommends approval of this item. The applicant was able to have prepared a professionally done site plan after the December 6th Planning Council meeting and has addressed the off-street parking and playground area requirements pursuant to city ordinance no. 86-8. Attachment(s) Ordinance No. 86-8 Section 5.4 Planning Council Meeting Minutes, December 6, 2011 and March 6, 2012 Planning Council Application and Checklist Staff Report Prepared By: Howard W. Brown, Jr., Community Development Director Gerald Lee, City Planner MINUTES PLANNING COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, DECEMBER 06,2011 ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m. by Chairman Russell. Present were members Elio Guerrero and Joseph J. Kelley. Also present were City Attorney Michael Rodriguez, Community Development Director Howard W. Brown, Jr. and Planner Gerald J. Lee. A correction to the roll call was made as related to Board members Alvin Burke and Ella Cobbs who had resigned. Chairman Russell inquired if Community Development had received anything in writing about their resignations. Mr. Brown said he only received verbal notice and would check with the City Clerk about getting a confirmation of the resignations in writing. II INVOCATION AND PLEDGE: Member Kelley said the invocation and the Pledge of Allegiance followed. III APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 13, 2011 Member Kelley made a motion to approve the minutes and Member Guerrero seconded the motion. Upon roll call the minutes passed 3-0. Elio Guerrero - yes Joseph Kelley - yes Calvin Russell - yes • Member Kelley mentioned for the record that he has to be somewhere else by 8; and to the staff a 7 o'clock meeting should be a 7 o'clock meeting starting. He did not know what happened but the doors were not opened and in the future they should be opened because it is not fair to them or the applicants to stand outside waiting. Chairman Russell said it's a Planning Council Minutes 12/06/2011 Page 1 of 8 first time and he believes Community Development has been doing an excellent job in assuring the doors are open. IV, PUBLIC HEARINGS: I. 0 & E EAST COAST INVESTMENTS LLC. 2527 OPA-LOCKA BOULEVARD, OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054; LOTS 24 & 25, BLOCK 151, COMMUNITY GARDENS, PB 31-5, LOT SIZE 14, 148 SQ FT; FOLIO #0821220110420; ZONED B-1 REQUEST: CITY CffMMISSION •.PPROVAL TS •OPERATE A CHILD CARE ACADEMY Chairman Russell mentioned that this item was heard before and it was approved with conditions and forwarded to the Commission. He did not know why it was coming again and did not know what to do with it. Attorney Rodriguez said that when it went in front of the Commission the Planning Council had given the conditions that they meet the parking requirements by showing a site plan showing the parking spaces. There was no clear evidence whether the conditions were met with what was presented to them; therefore they had two options, to deny or send it back to the Planning Council to review and assure the parking requirements are met according to code. Chairman Russell asked if the parking issue was met. Mr. Brown said the condition has to be addressed prior to them going again before the Commission. They will have to come into compliance in order to return to the Commission and prior to getting an occupational license. Chairman Russell then asked how many parking spaces they have. Ms. Aixa Serra, owner of the child care academy, 985 N. E. 116th Street, Biscayne Park, FL 33161, said they have 24 parking spaces. She did not know why she was back at the Planning Council because when she came July 12 she was approved. In October she called to find out what happened because she had not heard anymore and the secretary told her that the Commission did not approve it but sent it back to the Planning Council because of the parking conditions. Chairman Russell then asked Ms. Serra if she had anything to show that she came into compliance. She replied yes and that she showed having 24 parking spaces. There are two churches and her day care. The twenty four parking spaces are used by them Monday through Friday and the two churches are there only on Saturdays and Sundays. Member Kelley said the letters sent from Ms. Serra mentioned there is only one public school in the area and no day cares; there's only two public religious schools and there are 3 or 4 charter schools in the area and several other day cares. He mentioned that staff recommended approval but wanted to know how they are going to address the parking if they are sharing the space with two churches. Mr. Brown said a condition was placed where they have to comply with the off street parking requirements; a site plan showing Planning Council Minutes 12/06/2011 Page 2 of 8 the off street parking spaces would be sufficient. At the Commission meeting there was discussion about playground and parking spaces. There may have been some confusion as to what is off street parking. To clear this matter they have to show the off- street parking spaces on a site plan prior to obtaining a business license. Chairman Russell said he is very familiar with the area and there are other people who occupy the same building, and due to that fact they cannot claim to have 24 (twenty-four) parking spaces. Attorney Rodriguez explained that the application presented was incomplete because according to the Land Development Code the off street parking requirements for a day care is one parking space for each 500 (five hundred) gross sq. ft. of floor area. Ms. Serra notified that there are 1800 (eighteen hundred) sq. ft. Attorney Rodriguez said for 1800 (eighteen hundred) sq. ft. 3 (three) or 4 (four) parking spaces are required, 24 (twenty four) parking spaces have to be divided between the day care and the two churches. If there is an understanding that the uses are only going to be Saturday and Sundays, and the day care Monday through Friday there may not be an issue. Mr. Lee added that in a particular site shared parking often means there are formulas that allow for multiple uses at certain times. They are saying that most of the time they are operating the churches are not operating. It doesn't preclude that the churches could be operating at other times, but generally they will have 3 (three) parking spaces. Another thing if they have enough parking for staff, when kids come and go, their parking is momentarily, like a retail shop. Attorney Rodriguez then explained the code requirements for parking spaces for churches. Without a shared parking agreement if there is an understand that church uses are going to be Saturday and Sunday and the day care uses are Monday through Friday, and there is not going to be any overlapping, that may not be an issue. However, it may become an issue in the future. Chairman Russell then opened the public hearing. Mr. Eddie Rodriguez, 6200 SW 67 Avenue, Miami. 33143. He is an engineer and does many site plans and is bringing one tonight before them. He suggested that if it was already approved she could submit a site plan to the Planning Council with the parking requirements; she can have an engineer do it for her and submit it. Attorney Rodriguez said that is what the Commission had decided. Ms. Serra said she did produce the site plan. Member Kelley asked the staff if the requirement that the Commission and Planning Council recommended to the applicant was adhered to? Mr. Brown said his recommendation is that if it's the pleasure of the Council to approve it subject to site plan review by the office and present to Commission for ratification or table the item until they can bring it back to the Council. Member Kelley interrupted by telling him that was already done. Based on the attorney and chair the requirements haven't been met. If they have not been met the Council cannot be asked to pass something that was sent before with the same challenge. The applicant has to be told that she did not meet the requirements. If she did it would have been passed by the Commission when it went before them. Planning Council Minutes 12/06/2011 Page 3 of 8 Chairman Russell then asked for a motion. Member Kelley said he will not support it because he does not have a site plan, he would move to table it to the next Council meeting in January, 2012. Chairman Russell then informed Ms. Serra about what would happen. Member Guerrero made a motion to table it and Member Kelley seconded the motion for discussion. Chairman Russell said that would only send them back to the same situation, and he would not support that. Ms. Serra was upset because she felt it was not fair that she would probably have to wait another six months. She had been waiting since July for this approval. Attorney Rodriguez explained the situation to Ms. Serra about the code requirements and the reason of the Commission deciding to deny the recommendation and send it back to the Planning Council. She must meet the minimum code requirements for parking on a site plan, otherwise she will be in violation of the code. That has not been met and she should consult with a professional in order to provide a proper site plan because the Council cannot approve or recommend approval to a user site that is inconsistent with the code. There were concerns with the Planning Council and with the Commission because they were not adequately responded. There are no assurances that she met the minimum requirements. Member Kelley asked if there was a site plan. Mr. Lee said yes, but it was incomplete. The site plan addressed parking but not adequately. Member Kelley asked if the applicant was told that the site plan did not show the parking requirements. Mr. Lee responded positively, that the secretary had told him before she retired that she had conveyed the information to the applicant and had not received any updates from the applicant. The public hearing was opened. Mr. Eddie Rodriguez, 6200 SW 67 Avenue, Miami. 33143. He is an engineer and does many site plans and is bringing one tonight before them. He suggested that if it was already approved she could submit a site plan to Planning Council with the parking requirements; she can have an engineer do it for her and submit it. Attorney Rodriguez said that is what the Commission had decided. Ms. Serra said she did produce the site plan. Chairman Russell asked for a vote but the first motion to table failed due to lack of a second. Discussion followed and Member Kelley then made a motion to send it back to the Commission, no second. Chairman Russell asked for a motion to approve or deny. Member Kelley then asked if it can be sent back to the Commission without any recommendation from the Council. Attorney Rodriguez gave a positive response. Member Kelley then moved to recommend denial and for the applicant to appeal to the Commission. The motion was seconded by Member Guerrero. Upon roll call the motion to deny passed 3-0. Elio Guerrero - yes Joseph Kelley - yes Calvin Russell - yes Planning Council Minutes 12/06/2011 Page 4 of 8 2 3 Attorney Rodriguez explained to the Council that items 2 and 3 will be pulled from the agenda per the applicants request because they were not ready. 4. ZUMA LLC/DAISY SANCHEZ, 12950 ALEXANDRIA DRIVE (VACANT LAND) OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 (ADDRESS NOT CONFIRMED BY THE PROPERTY APPRAISER), N 160 OF S968.51 OF TRACT 303, LOT SIZE IRR OR 17516-0673 0197 4 COC 24518-0522 04 2006 6, REVISED PLAT NILE GARDENS SECT 1; PB 38-56; Folio # 0821280070260; ZONED I-2. REQUEST: ZONING CHANGE FROM 1-2 Ti, I-2A i1FISTRICT Daisy Sanchez, 12950 Alexandria Drive, Opa-locka, FL 33054 and Mr. Eddie Rodriguez, 6200 SW 67 Avenue, Miami, FL 33143, came before the Council to request a zoning change from I-2 to I-2A. He said that the area is not a vacant lot and the business has been operating since the 70's and it is a junk yard. They submitted their site plan and the other documents required. Chairman Russell asked if this was the same as the request on the last meeting. Mr. Lee said that this request was similar to the other requests that were on 32 Avenue and Cairo Lane. This area is outside of the I-2A zoning district but west of 32 Avenue. Member Kelley said this is like all the others who wanted zoning change. He wanted to clear whether it is or not a vacant lot. Mr. Rodriguez responded that it is not and it's dated back to 2001. Member Kelley asked staff if it's vacant or not. Mr. Brown answered that he does not have that information but knows Mr. Rodriguez said there's a business and there must be a reason for him filing for a zoning change. Then he asked staff if they know if there is something on the property. Mr. Lee replied yes there is a business, a salvage yard. Member Kelley then requested that something be sent to the Commission from the Planning Council addressing how they are going to proceed with the I-2 to I-2A because from here on there will be more applicants having to come into compliance with the way the code is situated. Mr. Brown said staff is recommending approval. He informed that there was an ordinance adopted in 2001 that clarifies procedures for this type of uses in any areas off 135 Street, 32 Avenue and 129 Street. The intent of the ordinance is to allow those types of businesses by conditional use. The applicant submitted an application for a rezoning to I-2A which if he gets rezoning it's less restrictive. Therefore, the staff is recommending that he be allowed to have a conditional use to operate with conditions, as numerated in the recommendations that are in the packages. It would be in consistence with 2001 guides from the commission. The Commission wanted to allow junkyards in close proximity from Cairo Lane. With a conditional use staff will be able to address certain things like off street parking,paved parking, permanent buildings, restrooms, etc. Chairman Russell then opened and closed public hearing. No one came forward for or against the case. Planning Council Minutes 12/06/2011 Page 5 of 8 Member Kelley made a motion to approve the zoning change from I-2 to I-2A with conditions and Member Guerrero seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed 3-0. Elio Guerrero - yes Joseph Kelley - yes Calvin Russell - yes 5. 6. MAGNOLIA NORTH APARTMENTS, LLC, OPA-LOCKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, (OLCDC), (5) 2060 LINCOLN AVENUE, OPA- LOCKA, FL 33054, LOTS 8 & 9, BLOCK 6, MAGNOLIA SUB, PB 40-80, FOLIO 0821220030610, ZONED R-2; (6) 15050 DUVAL STREET, FL 33054, LOTS 4 & 5, BLOCK 1, MAGNOLIA SUB, PB 40-80, FOLIO 0821220030040, ZONED R-2 REQUEST: ZONING CHANGE FROM R-2 TO OVERLAY DISTRICT PER AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 86-8 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CO E; MAGNOLIA NORTH RE.`I EVELOPMENT OVERLAY ORDINANCE #11-17 Mr. Brown informed these sites are located in Magnolia North, the City Commission adopted a redevelopment overlay district which allows for flexible standards regarding parking lot, off street parking spaces, setbacks, etc. Magnolia North LLC is proposing to rezone the properties to the new overlay district. This is the only way they will be able to utilize the properties because of zoning incompatibilities and the overlay district will allow them to occupy the space to bring a multifamily housing development in the two sites. The ordinance adopted by the Commission has guidance and the staff report has listed the concessions in the packages. Staff recommendation is for approval. Member Kelley said he already has a problem with what they are trying to do, and knows about the overlay ordinance, but the commission already passed it. Chairman Russell then opened and closed public hearing. No one came forward for or against the case. Member Kelley made a motion to approve the zoning change to the overlay district for 2060 Lincoln Avenue and Member Guerrero seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed 3-0. Elio Guerrero - yes Joseph Kelley - yes Planning Council Minutes 12/06/2011 Page 6 of 8 Calvin Russell - yes Member Guerrero then made a motion to approve the zoning change to the overlay district for 15050 Duval Street and Member Kelley seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed 3-0. Elio Guerrero - yes Joseph Kelley - yes Calvin Russell - yes 70 Community Development Department, 780 Fisherman Street, 4th Floor, Opa-locka, FL 33054 REQUEST 4 (FOUR) AMENDMENTS TO CITY 001- YI INANCE 86-6-8, T s ,E LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. Mr. Brown requested that this item be tabled to a date certain, the meeting of January 04, 2012. Upon roll call the request passed 3-0. Elio Guerrero - yes Joseph Kelley - yes Calvin Russell - yes V OTHER BUSINESS: STAFF UPDATE There was no other business to be discussed. VI ADJOURNMENT Member Kelley motioned to adjourn and Member Guerrero seconded the motion. Meeting adjourned at 8:04 pm. Planning Council Minutes 12/06/2011 Page 7 of 8 ti 4 44 p _n y�144 Y:r/A,l._,•i SIN MINUTES PLANNING COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 6,2012 ROLL CALL: Planning Council Meeting began after the workshop commenced. Planning Council meeting officially began at 7:01pm. Members in attendance were Chairmen Russell, Joseph J. Kelly, Elio Guerrero, and Lillie Odom. Also present were City Attorney Michael Rodriguez, Community Development Director Howard W. Brown, Jr. and Planner Gerald J. Lee. II INVOCATION AND PLEDGE: Was stated during workshop III APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 7, 2012 Upon roll call the minutes passed 4-0. Elio Guerrero - Yes Joseph Kelley - Yes Calvin Russell - Yes Lillie-Odom - Yes Planning Council Minutes 03/6/2012 Page 1 of 13 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. ALL JAPANESE ENGINES. 2300 NW 150TH STREET, OPA-LOCKA FL 33054; E 192.65 FT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2 PER W/P #23000, PB77-73, LOT SIZE 33581 SQ FT; FOLIO# 0821220250110 REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO USE AN ALUMINUM SMELTING FURNACE Mr. Brown recommended that panel approve for Mr. Charles Nunez's All Japanese Engines. He agrees with the request for the conditional use permit for an aluminum smelting furnace. He does not support the approval for the applicant to operate a junkyard or an auto salvage business. Councilman Joseph Kelly states that we should carry out the public hearing first before we do the staff recommendations. Chairman Calvin Russell agrees and asks the audience if anyone representing All Japanese Engines is present? Mr. Charles Nunez responds that he is the applicant and proceeds with his testimony. Nunez states that he doesn't know why he's back before the planning council. He explains that this issue should have been resolved back in October of 2011. He was not permitted to go before the Commission and doesn't understand why this is an issue considering the planning council previously approved the application. He feels the City Clerk dropped the ball in terms of notification. He stands before the council regarding the same issue(s)with regards to All Japanese Engines. Chairman Russell explains that his understanding is that Nunez came back before the planning council due to miscommunication of information. There was a discrepancy with regards to the conditional permit usage versus business activities taking place on the site that are not permissible. Nunez states that he's conducted business in Opa-locka since 1990. He's used the 14900 NW 22nd Avenue location and would have been pleased if Councilman Barrett were here to verify what he's saying. Councilman Kelly reiterated that Councilman Barrett was not present for tonight's meeting and Nunez continued onward. Nunez tells the panel that Councilman Barrett was on the Commission when his license was issued to him back in 1990. Robert B. Ingram apparently was the individual who issued him the license. In 1993, Dan Ron notified Nunez that there were going to demolish 14995 NW 22nd Planning Council Minutes 03/6/2012 Page 2 of 13 Court because the city considered the property to be a hazard. The building was filled with homeless people illegally occupying the facility. He purchased the 14995 NW 22nd Court property and was allegedly told by Tate that he could move his license from the 14900 NW 221Id Avenue location to the 14995 22nd Court. In 2001, Nunez purchased 2300 NW 150th Street. This property he states was also a"nuisance property" which suffered the same fate as the 14995 NW 22nd Court location. The homeless occupied the boats and trailers located on 2300 NW 150th Street. Nunez claims that he went before Tate and told him that the only way he'd erect a 10,000 sq. ft. building on the %z acre lot(and spend $700,000 USD in doing so) was that if his license would be transferred from 22nd Court to the 2300 NW 150th Street location. He claims this was agreed to by Tate and himself. The acre in question he's used since 2001. However, Nunez has been conducting business in Opa- Locka since 1990. Nunez claims that he's been a big contributor to that part of Opa- locka by keeping it clean. He states he's the one who cleared the empty lot and made it what it is today. Nunez claims he's the responsible party who cleared that lot from loiterers and feels that he's the one who has been wronged. He wished he could have Alfonso Tate or someone from the old board who can vouch for him. Nunez then goes further to describe his civic contribution(s) to the city. An example is when Alfonso Tate asked him to donate money to help buy bicycles for the children in the city. Before he could finish, Chairman Russell stated that the meeting taking place doesn't necessarily have to do with his civic contributions to the city. Nunez retorted that it has everything to do with the meeting because it shows that he is a major supporter and contributor to Opa-locka. Chairman Russell addressed Nunez and the board. He stated that the last time the board met up, they called themselves "grandfathering"Nunez in. The board approved his application which was forwarded later to the Council. The Commission felt that his application needed to be reviewed further by the board and sent the application back instead of voting it down. The board decided to look into Nunez's recycling proposal and compare it to the junkyard and salvaging operation. Chairman Russell stated that Nunez was not able to partake in those activities on the current parcel he holds. The Community Development and Planning department stated that even if they approved the recycling, the junkyard and the scrap will NOT be included because he is not properly zoned to do that in that facility. Chairman Russell believes that because Nunez purchased an undesirable property, took on the task of cleaning it up; Nunez now thinks that it gives him the exclusive right to establish businesses(s) on the parcel, which may or may not be permissible. Mr. Nunez responds by saying that he has inherited his father's problem and this issue should have been dealt with many years ago. He does not want his children to inherit this problem. This is why he is willing to fix the situation. Nunez stated earlier that he should have been heard before Commission back in October. The city clerk dropped the ball because she failed to advertise it. Nunez feels he should have had a chance speak to the Commission. He claims he's Planning Council Minutes 03/6/2012 Page 3 of 13 been going through this ordeal since July. He recalls that he applied for an I-2A in July. Nunez declared that If the I-2A was going was to be such a problem, he would have never even applied for the license (I-2A is a license that permits one to become a legal salvage operation). He spent monies to appear before the board for both the smelting use permit and the I-2A. He claims he was approved from the board and does not understand the issues presented to him because he feels he has met the criteria required of him. Nunez also points out that he has not even moved a block from where he was originally issued the license. He's within 200 ft. of where the license issued. Chairman Russell asks if Nunez has his licenses at this time. Nunez states that both the scrap metal the junkyard license was issued to him by Robert Ingram. Nunez explains that he has tried everything. He has invested his entire life savings into that property and he uses the parcel for what it was designed for. He does not specifically state what that use is. He also claims that his business is more legal than the those in the I-2A area. (Cairo Lane). Nunez says that whole area is illegal because you cannot operate a scrap yard or junkyard on a septic tank. All of the properties on Cairo Lane are on septic tanks. He claims he has monitoring wells, and adequate sewer. In fact he has more than what he needs to be in business. Chairman Russell suggests that Nunez stick to the order of discussion which is his application to obtain a conditional use permit. He claims that Nunez is being sidetracked with what other businesses are doing in the area, which does not specifically pertain to his situation. He offered the floor to anyone else who has any questions or concerns before he concludes the hearing. Councilman Kelly said that he'd wait until the public hearing because the public has the right to speak after they've finished. The panel had no other questions so Member Kelly thanked Nunez for his participation and concluded the hearing. Public Hearing For or Against No Response Public Hearing Closed Member Kelly says the contents of the packet include staff recommendation for approval of All Japanese Engines. However, that approval is contingent based upon certain criteria. The criteria goes to the fact the application was erroneous for various reasons. According to the applicant, his application went before the Commission and was sent back to the Planning Council. Member Kelly's biggest question addressed to the Chair, staff, or attorney was how come the Council sent back the application to the Planning Council if they already received the recommendations with contingencies? Planning Council Minutes 03/6/2012 Page 4 of 13 Mr. Brown explained that the City Commission meeting had more detailed information presented to them, which the Planning Council did not receive. The numerous licenses presented at the City Commission were not presented before the Planning Council. When the application went before the planning council; Community Development and Planning recommended the approval to operate the smelting oven because it was consistent with the ordinance adopted by the Mayor and the Commission. We are still recommending approval of the aluminum smelting oven in that zoning district. We want to make sure that the planning council understands everything stated in your packets. Although we did not have all of the information when it was first approved, we still recommend the approval of the applicant, All Japanese Engines, provided that the applicant no longer operates a junkyard. Member Kelly responds that if he is hearing correctly,Nunez is still operating a junkyard. Mr. Brown replied that he met with Mr. Nunez in our office. Nunez stated that he could operate an aluminum smelting oven and not violate by being a scrap metal or junkyard facility. Member Kelly says that he cannot go by the conversation that he and Nunez had alone. He retorted that the CDP recommended approval contingent on these issues being addressed. He can do the smelting; however, the Commission sent it back because they had information that the planning council didn't which has been presented to us now (in terms of licensure). Member Kelly stated that he still didn't understand why the Commission didn't vote up or down and passed the information back to the council because the facts didn't change just more information was presented. Mr. Brown responded that it was at the recommendation of the manager that the Planning Council take another look at the application (in light of the other facts presented). Any discussions now will be based on all facts presented therefore a final decision can be determined. Mr. Brown explained the steps of how the CDP operates. When people submit applications, it's their practice not to enforce things against them until they get a final resolution from the Commission. Mr. Nunez is still in the process with the Planning Council and the Commission. Councilman Kelly asks if the council sent their approval, why did it come back. Chairman Russell elaborated further that our approval was contingent upon the assumption that we could grandfather Nunez in the rezoning. Unfortunately he was right outside the box, so we attempted to open that channel to grandfather him in. It's not his fault, but apparently we didn't have the proper information. Chairman Russell felt he did not have enough understanding to take the advice of the recommendation and approve it. Planning Council Minutes 03/6/2012 Page 5 of 13 Member Kelly reiterates what Chairman Russell said regarding the "grandfathering concept"and the inability to grandfather him in due to the property being outside of the boundaries. Member Kelly asks the Attorney Michael Rodriguez if it is possible to grandfather Nunez considering the previous attempts failed. Attorney Rodriguez declared that the matter deliberated today should only be the application for a conditional use permit to use an aluminum smelting furnace. An aluminum smelting furnace is permitted as a conditional use on the said property. The problem is that the current usage of the property(salvage and junkyard) is inconsistent with the underlying zoning code. Tying one approved use to another is going beyond the scope of the application. If the applicant meets the criteria under the code, then that will be the information to decide upon. However, if the activities on the site are inconsistent with the current underlying zoning of the property, the applicant will proceed at his own risk for potential enforcement action on the part of the City for operating on a site that is inconsistent with the zoning code. The granting of occupational licenses is not a guarantee of zoning approval. Occupational licenses are taxes paid to the city. The receipt of an occupational license does not imply automatic zoning approval for the use on the property. Councilman Elio Guerrero asks if the Board already approved the specific request. Rodriguez responds that the Council is attempting to correlate two unrelated aspects together with regards to the usage. The granting of a conditional use permit for smelting does not make it permissible for the licensee to use that same permit for salvage/junkyard usage. The usage must be consistent with the permit and the zoning code. If the usage is inconsistent with the zoning code and the ordinances currently on the books, the applicant will risk enforcement action. Chairman Russell asks the attorney if board has in fact unknowingly made accommodations for Nunez to operate in the zoning area for which he shouldn't be operating in. The attorney repeated that the application that's before the council is for a consideration of a conditional use permit for aluminum smelting. That is what the council is reviewing and that is what the council will be making their recommendations on. Rodriguez went to further explain that a permitted use subject to meeting certain objective conditions which are met in the code. If one meets the conditions listed, then they can proceed to that use. Chairman Russell asked for further clarification if the council could have grandfathered Nunez in. Mr. Brown addressed the question and explains that Nunez is in the right zone to operate an aluminum smelting oven. The other uses of scrap metal and junk yard usage are a separate issue that cannot be considered by the board at this time. Therefore, the recommendation should solely be based on the conditions of the aluminum smelting oven. Planning Council Minutes 03/6/2012 Page 6 of 13 Rodriguez states that the council could treat each issue separately. The panel could grant a conditional use approval. If the applicant down the road decides he wants to create a separate use that is not permitted, he can attempt to and suffer the consequences of enforcement action. However that doesn't revoke the permitted use he's currently been issued. So if the application is solely restricted to the conditional use permit for aluminum smelting(which is permitted on that zoning district on said parcel), the applicant will be subject to meeting specific conditions in which he's already met. Chairman Russell asks why the application came back to us. Is it because we didn't have proper information? Mr. Brown responds that his statement is correct. Chairman Russell comments that the Council's decision was based on improper information. Given that we gave the approval, the application should go forward to the Council so they can deal with it. There is nothing for us to vote on because we already gave an approval. Member Kelly agrees with Guerrero's previous statement. The council already gave answer to the Commission and followed through with protocol. Attorney Rodriguez states that council should consider if the application meets the criteria presented in the code for the conditional use for an aluminum smelting furnace. Rodriguez states that when it comes to conditional uses, one cannot use subjective information to come up with a decision. There are specified conditions that need to be met for approval. If the Council is attempting to state there is something else besides the operation of the aluminum smelting furnace, then that issue will be address when further evidence is provided. Until then, the council needs to rule according to what is specified in the application and grant a conditional use permit based on the objective criteria according to the code. Extraneous issues will be addressed with a warning to the applicant. He will be forewarned that if he proceeds with usage not outlined by the permit issued to him, disciplinary action will be enforced by the city. Councilman Kelly deliberates with the panel if the application fits the criteria. Kelly emphasized the term"extraneous" with regard to the application but agrees that the council can only make a proper assessment based solely on the application. He states that everything is said is on record (being that minutes are notated) so the Council can refer to that to address any questions or concerns. Councilman Kelly suggested to the council to leave the"extraneous"part out their decision making process and let the Council decide on how they would like handle the situation. Mr. Lee surmises that it is important to do what's fair and correct based on the merits of the conditional use permit. How would like to proceed Member Kelly? Make a motion to proceed with the Member Elio Guerro Planning Council Minutes 03/6/2012 Page 7 of 13 Councilman Kelly stated it is important to approach staff and management to make sure what the council is recommending. They need to make the decision we are voting on what's before us in terms of the specific item. They can address it anywhere they want. End of discuss Upon roll call, the motion passed 4-0 Member Lillie Odom-Yes Member Joseph Kelly-Yes Member Elio Guerrero- Yes Chairman Russell- Yes 2. 0 & E EAST COAST INVESTMENTS, LCC. 2527 OPA-LOCKA BOULEVARD, OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054; LOTS 24 &25, BLOCK 151, COMMUNITY GARDENS, PB 31-5, LOT SIZE 14, 148 SQ FT; FOLIO #0821220110420; ZONED B-1 REQUEST: CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL TO OPERATE A CHILD CARE ACADEMY Attorney Rodriguez began with introducing of the second application for consideration which is OE East Coast Investments, LLC. Applicant name is AXIA Serra/Little Ones Academy Corporation. Address is 2527 Opa-Locka Boulevard, Opa-Locka, FL 33054. The request is to operate a child care facility. Chairman Russell asks if the applicant for the project was present. Applicant replied yes. Applicant states that she's been attempting to open up a child care facility since June of 2011. She also explains that if the panel has any questions or concerns, they can refer to the site plan and other documentation submitted. Chairman Russell stated that he reviewed all of her documentation, including the letter she wrote. Chairman Russell feels that this is another situation where the council out of courtesy, gave an applicant the benefit of the doubt and proceeded with a conditional approval upon applicant presenting to the City Commission a site plan. The applicant went before the Council and did not have a plan outlined. She was sent back to the Planning Council for review and still didn't provide illustrated site plans. This is another example of where an applicant does not adhere to the recommendations set forth by the planning council. Chairman Russell stated that the council voted her down during her second hearing because she did not meet all the prerequisites necessary to proceed. Russell's advice was to let the applicant take her chances and go before Commission for review. They will decide to vote her up or down based on the Planning Council Minutes 03/6/2012 Page 8 of 13 information provided. Chairman Russell feels that the Planning Council is indecisive with regards to their decision making process. Applicant stated she didn't have the opportunity to go before the Council because that she wasn't notified with regards to the appointment. Mr. Brown said she wasn't given notice of the City Council meeting. Mr. Brown wasn't able to verify the scheduled City Council meeting appointment with the clerk's office. Chairman Russell asked when the applicant was informed that she would go before to the planning council once again, she wasn't informed that she would need have to have the site plan. Applicant appeared before the board a second time without a site plan,however provided all the reasons why she should be approved. Chairman Russell thinks board members need to stand behind their decision. Chairman Russell is standing behind his vote. He states that it doesn't stop her from going before the Commission. Attorney Rodriguez responded that this situation differs slightly from the previous case. What occurred was the applicant was given the approval provided site plans be presented to the City Commission. She was to present a site plan to staff as part of her package to meet the parking requirements. When she arrived to the City Commission, (Rodriguez noted he was the presiding attorney that night), the site plan was not there. The only stipulation that the applicant needed to meet was her completion of a site pan to present to the City Commission. The Commission as a courtesy sent the case back to the planning council so the planning council would review her application and verify her plans were consistent with the code. When the case was heard again by council, the applicant failed to present a plan. Based upon that information, the council recommended that her application go before the Commission with a recommendation of a denial. The applicant filed a motion to rehear the case and therefore resubmitted her application. Attorney Rodriguez asked if the application was complete. Mr. Brown stated yes. Attorney Rodriguez continued, stating that if the application was complete with an inclusive site plan attached, a recommendation of approval should be rendered and her case moved forward to the city Commission. Councilman Elio Guerreo asked if the parking space issue was resolved. He wanted to know how many spaces were allocated to her business. Mr. Brown stated the parking space issue has been resolved. Chairman Russell went ahead and looked at the parking spaces and noted that there were only 5 spaces. He states that those spaces are not specifically designated for her business. The adjacent property is attempting to lease retail space; therefore, they will also utilize those spaces as well. He said the 5 parking spaces outlined spaces cannot be reserved for her plan. Attorney Rodriguez asks what the minimum parking requirements for this use are. Mr. Brown states that he believes it is 8 parking spaces. Attorney Rodriguez states that when you have an issue such as shopping center, the requirements are that sufficient parking spaces need to exist throughout the lot. Spaces do not have to be specifically assigned to each business. All the business has to ensure is that there is enough parking to go around for Planning Council Minutes 03/6/2012 Page 9 of 13 everyone. Staff is saying if they meet the minimum threshold, council should consider what is before them. Mr. Brown noted that during the last planning council meeting, the applicant requested a reconsideration of the matter. Chairman Russell stated that because they were going to rehear Japanese Engines, the council agreed that they could hear her case again in order to be fair. Mr. Brown stated that the applicant indicated that she didn't not want to proceed to the City Commission without an approval from the board. Chairman Russell replied that she was initially given an approval but was sent back because she did not comply with the instructions given. Chairman Russell respects and understands what the attorney and the staff is saying, however this is the third and fourth time the matter is going around. Chairman Russell asserts that it is responsibility for the applicants to meet all prerequisites before presenting the case to the Planning Council or the City Commission. Chairman Russell asks to give Motion on the Floor. Member Elio Guerrero agrees with Russell, however after hearing the recommendation of the attorney and staff, he's going to make a Motion to Approve. Upon roll call, the motion passed 3-0. Member Lille Odom- Yes Member Elio Guerro-Yes Chairman Calvin Russell- Yes Planning Council Minutes 03/6/2012 Page 10 of 13 3. CITY OF OPA-LOCKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 780 FISHERMAN STREET, 4TH FLOOR, OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 REQUEST: THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY ORDINANCE 86-8 (LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE): a. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE CREATING A TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT AT CITY CENTER b. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE THAT ALLOWS THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPEMTN RIGHTS Attorney addressed the third item on the agenda as the application of the City of Opa-locka's Community Development Department. The City is filing a request to amend the city ordinance 86.8 of the Land Development Code. The item to be presented is the consideration of an ordinance creating a Transit Oriented Development Orderly District at city center. Chairman Russell confers with staff to withdraw the second which would consider an ordinance that allows transit development rights. Chairman Russell noted council member's left for the evening, therefore he suggested that the staff wait until the entire council was present to vote on this issue. He didn't want this item to fall through the cracks with only a few panel members present. Mr. Lee recommended that the council proceed with the voting. Chairman Russell noted that the council was well informed with regards to the TOD project since they already viewed the presentation made by the CDP. Chairman Russell requested a motion on the floor to move this project. Chairman Russell then requested a motion for approval. Upon roll call, the motion passed 3-0 Member Lille Odom-Yes Member Elio Guerro- Yes Member Calvin Russell- Yes Chairman Russell concluded that he would like see the city move forward. He is hoping that the CRA, the city, and staff can effectively work together. Chairman Russell believes that it is time to make a difference in the city. He thanks everyone for the good work they've put forward and states that this council will not stand in the way of progress. Planning Council Minutes 03/6/2012 Page 11 of 13 V OTHER BUSINESS: Chairman Russell stated that the towing and the fencing discussion will be postponed and both items will be addressed during the next Planning Council Meeting. He felt all members should be present during the voting of both the barb wire fencing and towing ordinances. The ordinances Russell refers to are listed below; CITY OF OPA-LOCKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 780 FISHERMAN STREET, 4TH FLOOR, OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 REQUEST: THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY ORDINANCE 86-8 (LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE): a. ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE USE OF RAZOR WIRE,BARB WIRE,AND OTHER HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS ON FENCES AND WALLS ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES CITYWIDE. THIS ALSO INCLUDES THE USE OF RAZOR WIRE,BARB WIRE, AND HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS ON FENCES AND WALLS ON NON-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES THAT ABUT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. b. AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING TOWING COMPLANIES AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE I-1 (LIMITED INDUSTRIAL ) ZONING DISTRICTS Attorney Rodriguez stated that the notice of the public hearing did not include items regarding towing and barb wire. Russell called for both items to be tabled for the next Planning Council meeting. Elio Guerro made a motion to table both items to the next Planning Council meeting. Lillie Odom seconds the motion Upon roll call, the motion passed 3-0 Member Lille Odom-Yes Member Elio Guerro- Yes Member Calvin Russell- Yes Planning Council Minutes 03/6/2012 Page 12 of 13 STAFF UPDATE Mr. Brown indicated there were no items for staff update. VI ADJOURNMENT Member Kelley motioned to adjourn and Member Guerrero seconded the motion. Meeting adjourned at 8:30pm Submitted by Gerald Lee Recording Secretary ATTEST: 0a41.--7 1 /1/ Presiding Officer or Administrative Head Chairman-Planning Council Title Planning Council Minutes 03/6/2012 Page 13 of 13 � 0 CA,V, AC/aSiiFtrv,74 Carp'. 2527 Opa Locka Blvd, Opa Locka, FL, 33054 From : Aixa Serra Dear Commissioners, Educators believe a child's future development to be significantly influenced by the first few years of life. With this in mind, we have endeavored to create a program that will most benefit the children of this community, most important years. We believe that the evolvements of social, emotional and cognitive skills are of considerable importance to a child's overall development. For this reason, we have incorporated into our program: experiences, activities and learning methods that will allow children to expand, investigate and nourish these skills. Our goal is to operate a Child Care Academy in order to provide a nurturing, healthy, and positive learning environment with quality education for young children of low income families. Al o-tA-t crag- p-rogra,pw • License requested for 60 children • Operation hours—6:30 am to 6:30 pm , Monday thru Friday • Ages—3 months—5 years old •- After school program-5 years old—9 years old • Summer camp—2 years old—9 years old • Because healthy eating habits are so important we will provide nutritious meals and snacks. We participate in the Florida Food Program with the "Color me Healthy"food program. • Education Program—The Creative Curriculum + Staff is CDA, DCF, Birth/Elementary CPR, and First-Aid Certified • We win `:`.`ors_together with the Early Learning Coalition of Miami-Dade/Monroe Subsidized ch idcare program in order to help low income families. We decided to choose the city of Opa Locka to create our child care academy center because the city of Opa Locka has the most development in Dade County. We have researched and in this particular area there are lots of public elementary schools and but very few day care centers. I have been an early learning educator and licensed child care provider for 14 years. Working with children is my passion, helping them strive and have a better opportunity for a future where they can reach their goals. We look forward to working with the city of Opa Locka and being part of the commercial community. Thank you. Best Regards, Aixa Serra-----j-'----.tf " fir " THE GREAT CITY " ovrw cic,1. ) x • {ry ? PA =g Ka „ ' /.• } 1'r P c' PLANNING COUNCIL APPLICATION APPLICATION NUMBER: CHECK NUMBER: /0 61 DATE RECEIVED: = 7 _ i ogL PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Ea.5.-1 C 45 7 n VeS—i jty)eS 61 LL C , PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS: 138-5 itiok 6elft-e-S DI— 141/ a e 6tt %1 35iti Number/Street City State/Zip Code ce A PPLICANT'S NAME: X A ` Pic //v 7/ On e Ac7 c .01 y e0/Z APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: R ° J f y E /169 --1 6 /6 eaLi f)Q.. /< lam! 3:3/4 Number/Street City State/Zip Code PHONE NUMBER: OFFICE 7 6 '(9- 9(P HOME 3��a '? OTHER SUBJECT PROPERTY ADDRESS: g._5-J .4 CA IOC 1(4 1,,a3)VD Number/Street TAX FOLIO NUMBER: 11�r�— / gc).-—0/ 1 SENT ZONING: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: c9-a,52 q l (16,17/7-)0i f 6-a fe.b€f)6 "PS 31-5 Please check specific request: Tentative Plat Final Plat _Comprehensive Plan Amendment _Drainage Plan Fill Permit Request _Preliminary Site Plan Review Final Site Plan Review Conditional Use Permit—No Plans Conditional Use Permit—With Plans Special Exception—No Plans Special Exception—With Plans Other—Please specify: Add any additional information that may be of importance to this request: Page 1 of 4 PLANNING C=1 UNCIL APPLICATION (Check list) Applications will not be accepted without the following data. For a public hearing, all items below are necessary and must be submitted. ----7Completed application form Application fee of$1250.00 payable to the City of Opa-locka by check or money order Copy of property owner's and/or applicant's driver license/photo I.D. ._Affidavit(see below),and power of attorney of the property owner(page 3)(Both must be Notarized) IA completed Neighborhood Petition form (attached) with the signature of each property owner in front, rear, left and right of his property showing they have no objections to the project(name,address,phone number). It All preliminary and final site plans, along with property survey, must be submitted on CD-Rom disc in Cad format Fifteen(15)certified boundary and topographic surveys of the property(size 36 x 24 inches) Fifteen (15) copies of Site Development Plan showing all drainage, water, sewer, structures, landscaping and parking in accordance with the City's zoning ordinance; (size 36 x 24) Map showing parcel to be considered and all properties' legal descriptions thereof, within 375' radius of said parcel. Map to be 1" = 100" scale. Owner's name, address, folio number and legal description on each parcel (Original and 2 copies size of document to accommodate scale) Narrative concept to be submitted with application AFFIDAVIT I, 0/E 7 `� ,°`,''r,b being fir t duly sworn, depose and say that I am the OWNER of the property ,and I understand that 's ap i ication must be complete and accurate before a public hearing can be advertised. Signature 0,5-,a7,-.• / Date Sworn to and subscribed before me: This !X '7 Iida.:of 1f.,C 1 v' O 1 My commission expires ) 1 % 5 Notary tj I / ;y _ f I11S 1 Fr�NANDEZ Atta i p of i t entifi ation COMMISSION#or,916694 3' , EXPIRES.August 13,2013 I I-xoo 3,=".' ky ri Notary Discount Assoc Co ^•' `25 5.1.^„".4' r0'.' i6W.W'__,.-11:' FL- Pt Pi3o-00 1u D- c, Page 2 of 4 PLANNING COUNCIL APPLICATION POWER OF ATTORNEY This form is to be attached to all applications, and to be returned with the application. No application will be honored or persons heard by the Planning Council unless a notarized copy of this Power of Attorney is submitted. To: j City of Oppaa-locka a - From: ` `gf E .. 6 1 1.- -i if` ' / '.) ill..... L L C 7, 4 Subject: Power of Attorney (authorization for a person, other than the property owner, to speak in the property owner's behalf). if( '"-P Ct. I aCs `2210 /4VaC ,being first duly sworn,depose and say that I am the owner of the property Dally described. s: _ 2.2- 32. S- i ( o - m<' �� oe>) ` -: l-5 40 if) ,V12" e.3.3- ., o iIC /5-9 407 -6 iz E./i4,e° 51, I do give to ® ---1D-C2-&-g-a the power of Attorney and authority to speak in my behalf in refer�e e to the above cribed property. Further, by affixing my notarized signature to this document, I also authorize .!f'9C.0 eZI2J to negotiate and commit to the City Commission and City Administrat 1in y behalf. I will abide by all final determinations of the City Commission and City Administration. 1r Signature = Date Sworn to and subs ribed before me: This c-A if 'l day of Ma- I I ir - 1 My commission expires: _44_ n Notary •i1 -- ,r fro ,, LUIS FERNANDEZ r my cow/Ass ON#DD916694 „ 5�'-z`-. c,y EXPIRES:August 13,2013 .. 0-3-N !.Notary DI noI ABEOO Co F' 1-800-800-3-NOTARY Att.,c,' .opy of ide tification :: W 'tt,a,V7, `' - FL PL Pi&3 —00 —V g--17 - 0 Page 3 of 4 PANNING COUNCIL APPLICATION NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION RE: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 7 OP4t-oeiCn 1 vcf2_ 0?/a tocec; 14 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ■ '4 -..5" ,41 ' LT /44 / 4Si PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: (1-) 474.6-1 CO/t37 frPici-Okarg0;- ;6-(4/-L4, ci ADDRESS (If different): jOcc■5— Mor,Sei tie,c 72-71,47,9; 0zacA :33/y / We,the undersigned,have no oNection to petitioner's request to: C e e00/00.7 e_e ei• .\)y NAME ADDRESS PHONE FRONT: 1.t2osal ee Esc ot fie I bithit:3ce 2. i29 k6a,e/2-e 8 E 411.A 4,4 Aye- td IA 372f))),1 403e eson 7/ iOtA) /365-4 (-7 S6 gS7IJ i‘SZ 4. RIGHT: 1. Oe E4,51 (20467 d-5"2 3 6M i-ockA /31a . )3co-qaetto SIDE: 2.0 E ng e6,45-1 OR) 10ek,4 /Old 3. OE ER5-1- erm_s7 0607 tA to c gA eIVd 3 3cb-(-10 47< 4.0 E 1 467 e6,4g7 ,25-J-7 O 2c>(K4 iN lid -30,s- LEFT: 1.1) E E,467- ( 6-i ( /2140e- LOT 1-tY- SIDE: 2 7-2q/'")1/-e-f 2._ 57:26' ./4 71/11-14-rc Mu-eue' 212 es- os-q 4.144-01', tti)-/1-4 /6_5 7. 7-e-/ OO REAR: 1. 2. 3. 4. Page 4 of 4 PANNING COUNCIL APPLICATION NEIGI- 1 0 HOOD PETITION - _c a-7 OPALv ,20, Nir: Ofilive ko Ft '33 Dg4 RE: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2" `---- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Cc7--- `,,•= °- I Cm ill Oil i'V baya L to,l,s P r., - i -.5 Milosiwcimivi< '--ir - 7 7/z ,--- , v-g 9i7 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: -44P1717--Pr A-PA' PHONE: 1:75'-74 ADDRESS(If different): 41.12111141M_ AW:_147 441 ! 41 .__ ' 1_ -1-719 111 We,the undersigned,have no objection to petitioner's request to: 7r,e V N. 1 %..../1 -"'-....■ '''''' Chi ZO alle.. Ce i)---ie (2, 1 i Lj. NAME t c,i..,..., A DDRES,S_ _ PHONE 1 _ : 5s 'A __.................-- 2. ,.._,, d. . - -f 1641' / i ---''' ° V 1 o5q 1 CI ',.. -f-, -6- 6L (.9 2c-Z5. 7A 6 4(7/ 7O 60 4. • At ,.41 , 1 Al I Icyp -2 c2 c f- 1 I 0 1 ' A. ... ' ' 2 1 eC RIGHT: 1. SIDE 9. e(-) 3. •os -S72-44-1 CY\ 4. f-ili-01 i 1. SIDE: 2. r 3. 4. gearZ, 1: • • ‘,..- - • :.,, — 2. C ihri 4 L . 3. . , ...- . Page 4 of 4 ( u I r l i; G n I E. 'I c u Li C E • C G G G C Ii G . C C e I I fl G C I \. G • Ci G El I l nI Cl c U l;1 .ai 'a Ai I 0 Li & LI i n 0s� W r r. • "r. , . ! r . . . . ! . • ,i...,, . . 1 , ,':',P"0,j,,.;',:,',,t1,0.• it, ,•,. '. 1, . . , \ . ■:,',:;,"4'1..i'V',:',4'''.- ''' '..'• l ' '!"..C,',7'.:i1' ' , ''''.`r'::,.,,::i;• . . '`... ; " ''.‘"-‘1 -,' •.. .,• • , ',1,'," • le ' ''' •' , ..„,, ' X'. .4.' • '•, ,. 1 i .. , . '''`,. ' .7%, - ' '• • , 12 -,,.2, • ,rAir`•:, --- I L.1i ! 1 ! •,. .., II ,1 . r' ',,,I,.....To•- 1, 1 .„.. . . • -- . . ' '-'. ;"'.,-,,,,-11.r.i..“'• ., ...t.: -::::.-i . :•.':, . t, ,'-r'''.'• ('' ', ' . .., . ... .,„ ' ".:,-:- ';'„- '..,'i.46---...' - '`•;, 1/ 0P''';'`i...'' ....,.:k ''''...'. •',,i1;i:'.„. ...,?',t„'. ;::'..i.:-4c. :,,;■rl ..■-:;';',' " ;..,:;fi.':.';' .iii,v.!'. '.'"-,,.:', ' 141?:•. . ',, ,. ,.. ' '.','','.....' •.,`,.? :„, „'..:'-'-.."•....,::,, ,'-',!-:. / ,..,' •;..:,,i, ,;!'"' .,,,tv„,,..., ,,.y. .. i,..; , . • • 011//i . ' . , • iiir''' I r, r 1 a E. , 1 C :-1 ', I u i . n 0 j i„ a_1 e ' El 1 . I G 1 g Cl. I U I n. c . U 1 & 1 Li U �� i? 1• 17. 1..:,, ■ 1; U I I U 1 ! ,.1 L' , Q ! I ! . a ! CI I IU . ' 9 1 1[) 11 t _ ,t ' i I : :yi., I ,y a5 . , . I emarismor , n A + .� .... ° ' � ....ors ' ,.. , \ . ....., . 4 u :wax". z r 1 lolif!' • „, -.?Le rrsY } . 4,-1.; E.. iC ,,r:... q!/ • • • • S. ; • .112.1 • • 1C i OC' • C1 V C' I L' ' pC ,, 7 f... • f. o c: • \ .tt.,l''' - ❑C uc ue. .off ❑L 0 ..; ? ❑ oI� - - �,• 0h • r. nAn p ti '.£ s i ,. .wYQ , �? 11 gg t.• ;`.fir,'' ❑C °� `' •1' , U `tit U El �'' U6 ❑GI4 k ❑C . • . ID E. • rsS 1M�- 0G 0 • t*r.„ • :,'.0; 1 , ;,, ' , ''.'....* --X ,t::,,.._-:..../arrie • Iiii ii ti� n++ e� it' [l C' ' , .-.:',i• ►il .ii., ,..... y��E loc , j� q-..; C 2 v�} �`11 i N F` �.u••i E. fd k t o d1 y�y- 4 malty_+/ 2.__;<' 1 • CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA 281 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING DEPARTMENT CUSTOMER'S RECEIPT 0513 I 20 if./ pa CD Ci� o Code No. p �j �/J ccog Received of Ai L o cif 'ter r�-� cp CO A./a-'--- � � r 0 C Address o g Description eletii."et,",„.- 1 0-07.- -t.-.!,,.....,1 _,, zet Ze-egg. - CoE •/ - o O. 0 CD ri l crG �—/ Dollars�� c CD Make all checks payable to (9,1-6,...) of Opa•locka,Florida Cashier 40 WHITE — Customer Copy YELLOW—Office Copy PINK— Department Copy AIXA L SERRA 12-09 I 109 985 NE 116 STREET BISCAYNE PARK,FL 33161-0000 /0 63-1482/670 273 ' ' Date i a� Paytothe (7, $ 4C25 ,OD?r ,. r `� Dollars , Me*" : to Bank "tq` � America's Most Convenient Bank° � ''/ For 0/),Aff.CO—Ae4)/ �`� nm :0670 L48 2 21: 4 24 57 30894v ( 0109 IhIlt,rint t:l,rrk,, ..,NA IIIU1k,N.A Nile Gardens East Page 1 of 1 My Home Miami-Dade County, Florida MIAMI•DADE miamidade.gov Property Information Map 'ft; , !1 1 Summary Details: t Folio No.: 08-2122-011-0420 S t Property: 2527 OPA LOCKA BLVD Mailing 0&E EAST COAST .. Address: INVESTMENTS LLC i 2527 OPA LOCKA BLVD ' OPA LOCKA FL I 33054-4047 ■ ..- Property Information: k RESTRICTED RETAIL(ii!/.1. DO ' Primary Zone: 6300 HIGHLY °' CLUC: 0013 OFFICE BUILDING • J Beds/Baths: 0/0 ") I Floors: 1 Living Units: 0 Adj Sq Footage: 10,012 ;l:,1. :liEis.1; UI;V.11!J:".'-1;'..`•v`t'" Lot Size: 14,148 SQ FT • Year Built: 1989 22 52 41 COMMUNITY GARDENS PB 31-5 1. Legal LOTS 24&25 BLK 151 Description: LOT SIZE 14148 SQUARE FEET OR ' 1Y'`1t;:'XJ;It;'.c' 18092-1918 0598 2 COC 25905-4217 09 2007 2 a3 " Assessment Information: I Year: 2011 2010 Land Value: $113,184 $31,833 Building Value: $740,065 $175,000 Market Value: $853,249 $206,833 Aerial Photography-2009 0 127 ft Assessed Value: $178,087 $161,898 This map was created on 3/30/2012 1:53:59 PM for reference purposes only. Taxable Value Information: Web Site©2002 Miami-Dade County.All rights reserved. Year: 2011 2010 Applied Applied Taxing Authority: Exemption/b Exemption/ Taxale Taxable Value: Value: Regional: $0/$178,087$0/$161,898 County: $0/$178,087$0/$161,898 City: $0/$178,087$0/$161,898 Close School Board: $0/$853,249$0/$206,833 Sale Information: Sale Date: 9/2007 Sale Amount: $395,000 Sale O/R: 25905-4217 Sales Deeds which include 3 r`�'I i Lf C(� `Q� e� Qualification more than one parcel � G� Description: View Additional Sales gib http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/printmap.asp?mapurl=http://gisims2.miamidade.go... 3/30/2012 Nile Gardens East Page 1 of 1 My Home Miami-Dade County, Florida MIAMIDADE iamidade.gov Property Information Map Summary Details: tr ='! Folio No.: 08-2122-011-043_Q Property: _!U 1„',x,1._;,}1' LStj Ir1[a;.;`a Mailing 0&E EAST COAST Address: INVESTMENTS LLC 2527 OPA LOCKA BLVD OPA LOCKA FL 33054-4047 Property Information: Primary Zone: 6300 HIGHLY y:{it.7ihlCsii !d:'• (4-1.;it:ri RESTRICTED RETAIL CLUC: 0081 VACANT LAND _ Beds/Baths: 0/0 Floors: 0 Living Units: 0 Adj Sq Footage: 0 Lot Size: 7,992 SQ FT Year Built: 0 :.1:";11 r ja COMMUNITY GARDENS PB 31-5 LOT 26 BLK 151 Legal LOT SIZE 7992 SQUARE Description: FEET OR 18092-1918 0598 2 COC 25905-4217 09 2007 2 OR 25905- 4217 0907 02 Assessment Information: h '•r'S ESP I Year: 2011 2010 Land Value: $63,936 $17,982 Building Value: $0 $0 Market Value: $63,936 $17,982 Aerial Photography-2009 0 115 ft Assessed Value: $19,780 $17,982 This map was created on 3/30/2012 1:15:05 PM for reference purposes only. Taxable Value Information: Web Site©2002 Miami-Dade County.All rights reserved. Year: 2011 2010 Applied Applied Taxing Authority: Exemption/ Exemption/ Taxable Taxable Value: Value: Regional: $0/$19,780 $0/$17,982 County: $0/$19,780 $0/$17,982 Close City: $0/$19,780 $0/$17,982 School Board: $0/$63,936 $0/$17,982 Sale Information: Sale Date: 9/2007 Sale Amount: ,$395,000 Sale 0/R: 25905-4217 Sales Deeds which include Qualification more than one parcel Description: View Additional Sale4 http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/printmap.asp?mapurl=http://gisims2.miamidade.go... 3/30/2012 Nile Gardens East Page 1 of 1 My Home Miami-Dade County, Florida MIAMIDADE iamidade.gov Property Information Map I 4 � Summary Details: �':� 'a a Folio No 0$-2122-011-044D Property: ` col !_U.;1.,J,f.°�.,ifif -2t j` ,ir?7,3;-It Maing 0&E EAST COAST I Address: INVESTMENTS LLC - 2527 OPA LOCKA BLVD OPA LOCKA FL ' 33054-4047 Property Information: Primary Zone: 6300 HIGHLY ,:.. RESTRICTED RETAIL r faca Q I L i144.1ii:4 CLUC: 0081 VACANT LAND Beds/Baths: 0/0 I Floors: 0 Living Units: 0 Adj Sq Footage: 0 ' Lot Size: 6,156 SQ FT ' Year Built: 0 COMMUNITY GARDENS PB 31-5 LOT 27 BLK 151 Legal LOT SIZE 6156 SQUARE Description: FEET OR 18092-1918 0598 2 COC 25905-4217 i ;,.', 09 2007 2 OR 25905- = 4217 0907 02 Assessment Information: r r- Year: 2011 2010 i Land Value: $49,248 $13,851 Building Value: $0 $0 Market Value: $49,248 $13,851 Aerial Photography-2009 0 115 fi Assessed Value: $15,236 $13,851 This map was created on 3/30/2012 1:15:27 PM for reference purposes only. Taxable Value Information: Web Site©2002 Miami-Dade County.All rights reserved. Year: 2011 2010 Applied Applied Taxing Authority: Exemption/T Exemption/ axable Taxable a Value: Value: Regional: $01$15,236 $0/$13,851 County: $0/$15,236 $0/$13,851 Close City: $0/$15,236 $0/$13,851 School Board: _$0/$49,248 $0/$13,851 Sale Information: Sale Date: 9/2007 Sale Amount: $395,000 Sale O/R: 25905-4217 Sales Deeds include Qualification more than one parcel Description: View Additional Sales http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/printmap.asp?mapurl=http://gisims2.miamidade.go... 3/30/2012 i Nile Gardens East Page 1 of 1 My Home Miami-Dade County, Florida MIAMI-DADE miamidade.gov Property Information Map Summary Details: � ;"• Folio No.: 08-2122-011-0410 Property: ,1 ,;., ,r.!: • n ;i.i, ' Mailing 0&E EAST COAST Address: INVESTMENTS LLC 2527 OPA LOCKA BLVD OPA LOCKA FL 33054-4047 Property Information: Primary Zone: 4400 MULTI-FAMILY, THREE STORY CLUC: 0081 VACANT LAND Beds/Baths: 0/0 Floors: 0 Living Units: 0 Adj Sq Footage: 0 Lot Size: 8,156 SQ FT Year Built: 0 1L1:11' ' :';i ^.:°7■LJa (!a'd;7 22 52 41 COMMUNITY GARDENS PB 31-5 LOT Legal 23 BLK 151 LOT SIZE Description: 6156 SQ FT OR 18184- 3424 0698 2(4)COC 25905-4217 09 2007 2 Assessment Information: Year: 2011 2010 I j`,'.01( aC1'' • Land Value: $12,928 $13,851 lI • • Building Value: $0 $0 Market Value: $12,928 $13,851 Assessed Value: $12,928 $13,851 Aerial Photography-2009 0 • 115 ft Taxable Value Information: This map was created on 3/30/2012 1:15:56 PM for reference purposes only. Year: 2011 2010 Web Site©2002 Miami-Dade County.All rights reserved. Applied Applied Taxing Authority: Exemption/ Exemption/ Taxable Taxable Value: Value: Regional: $0/$12,928 $0/$13,851 County: $0/$12,928 $0/$13,851 City: $0/$12,928 $01$13,851 School Board: $0/$12,928 $0/$13,851 Sale Information: Sale Date: 9/2007 Sale Amount: $395,000 Sale O/R: ;5905-4217 Sales Deeds which include Qualification more than one parcel Description: View Additional Sales http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/printmap.asp?mapurl=http://gisims2.miamidade.go... 3/30/2012 5.4 DAY CARE AND OTHER NURSERY FACILITIES A. Purpose The purpose of this Section of the Zoning Ordinance is to provide for places for day. resident care for children upon approval of the Planning Council in R-2, R-3, R-4, B-0, B-1, B-2 and are permitted in industrial districts where day care facilities are provided for on the premises by the employer for her/his, employees. The Planning Council shall, take precautions to insure that daycare centers do not saturate aparticular area of the City. B. Definition A day care and/or nursery facility is a legally approved structure for use on a permanent and continuous basis and is used to provide day resident care for children six (6) years of age or under. Said care shall be other than that normally provided by parents or guardians. C. General The more stringent of the requirements of this Ordinance or the South Florida Building Code and other applicable codes shall apply. Day care and other nursery facilities shall be permitted only upon approval of Commission after considering the recommendation of the Planning Council. An annual license must be obtained from the City to continue operations. State and City approvals and procedures shall apply. Employee background investigations may be required. The City may elect to perform the background investigation and charge the applicant a fee for the background investigation. Accessory structures which are supportive of and compatible with day care facilities many be permitted. D. Existing Uses Nothing contained in this Section of the Zoning Ordinance shall be deemed or construed to prohibit a continuation of the particular lawful use, or uses, of any land, building, structure, or premises legally existing in the respective districts at the time of the adoption of this Ordinance provided,however, that if any such existing lawful use is changed to a different classification after the date of the adoption of this Ordinance, such different use shall conform to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. If any legally existing use or occupancy of a building or premises conflicts with any requirement of this Zoning Ordinance, or any of its amendments, such building shall not be moved, structurally altered or added to except after approval after public hearing. All future buildings, structures, repairs, alterations or other improvements shall comply with all' requirements contained herein and such structural provisions of the building code and other regulations as have been incorporated, including any building on which construction was suspended at the time of adoption of this Ordinance and any building for which the foundation was not completed at said time. 61 E) PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The building height, setbacks, and total floor area shall be governed by the applicable zoning district regulations and/or site plan review. 1 . Minimum Lot Area - The minimum site area shall be no less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet. 2. Setbacks a) Yard setbacks shall be in compliance with the following minimum requirements or the more stringent requirement of the zoning district in which the use is located. Yard Setback (feet) Front 25 Rear 25 Side (street lot) 25 Side (interior lot) 10 Side (between structures) 15 b)Accessory structures are such as play equipment, sand pits, swimming pools, or covered rest areas. 3. Height - The maximum height of any structure shall ' not exceed two (2) stories or twenty-five (25) feet, whichever is less. 4. Lot Coverage - The combined coverage of the main structure and all other accessory structures shall not exceed forty percent (40%) of the total site. At least twenty percent (20%)of the site shall be landscaped. 5. Off-Street Parking - A permanently maintained, paved and landscaped off-street parking area shall be provided, at least one (1) space for each five hundred (500) gross square feet of floor area. 6. Minimum Floor Area - There shall exist a minimum usable floor area, inclusive of any space devoted to the kitchen, office/storage, and toilet facilities of not less than fifteen hundred (1,500) square feet. (Facilities with capacities exceeding forty (40) children shall provide twenty(20) square feet of additional floor area per child.) 7. Outdoor Play Area, - There shall be a minimum of forty-five (45) square feet of usable, safe, and sanitary outdoor play area per child. Play area shall be calculated at a rate of forty-five (45) square feet per child in any group using the play area at one time. The minimum play area shall not be less than one-half (1/2) of the licensed capacity. F.) Other Development Regulations 1. Fencing and Screening - Outdoor play areas shall have safe and adequate fencing or wall at a minimum of six (6) feet in height. Fencing material may be constructed of masonry or metal fencing made of non-corrosive metal. Fencing shall be designed in 62 a way as not to create a safety hazard to any child. 2. Hazards - All water hazards such as pools, swimming pools, wading pools, ditches, ponds or any other similar hazard to life and limb of a child shall be adequately fenced to prevent unsupervised access by any child. 3. Maintenance of Play Areas - Outdoor play areas shall be properly policed at all times and be clean and free of debris. 4. Accessory Uses, - Accessory uses may be permitted in accordance with the procedures and requirements outlined herein and after approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals, as appropriate. 5. District Regulations - When the day care or nursery use, or accessory use, is placed in any zoning district, the-more restrictive regulations of that district or this regulation shell apply: however, in all instances, the more restrictive of this Ordinance and other, applicable regulations shell apply. G. OTHER Day care centers or nurseries end related facilities shall not be located closer then one thousand (1,000) feet to any establishment, which has, as one of its principal purposes, the sale of liquor for consumption on or off the premises. The same uses shall not be located closer then five hundred (500) feet to any establishment which sells beer and/or wine for consumption on or off the premises, except that this subsection shall not apply to any one of the above mentioned uses presently in existence end operating legally or those businesses such as retail convenience food stores, grocery stores, end restaurants whose principal business is not the sale of alcoholic beverages but includes beer and wine as incidental to the primary business operations. Comply with all State and County regulations. 63 4L+" LO VL'ar EVMST ITS WJET HC lA 2729 OPA LOCKA -Ltd® OPT'. LOCKA, FL 33054 PHONE # (305) 3009066 --- M- — To whom it may concern: My name is Amador Prada, I am the owner of the subject property 2727 OPA LOCKA BLVD OPA LOCKA,FL 33054 This letter is in reference to the City of Opa Locka Planning Council Application. I have a personal interest and I am part owner of Little Ones Academy Corp. I do not have any intention to sell or rent the lots that will be used as: 1. Parking Spaces-Folio#: 08-2122-011-0430 & 08-2122-011-0440 2. Playground- Folio #: 08-2122-011-0410 Those lots are specifically for those uses. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to give me a call. Best Regards, Amador Prada ,, U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ELEVATION CERTIFICATE Federal Emergency Management Agency OMB No. 1660-0008 National Flood Insurance Program Important: Read the instructions on pages 1-8. Ex°lies February 28.2009 Al. Building Owner s Name Osmany Prada&Ei¢a� GSECTION A-PROPERTY INFORMATION For Insurance Company Use: Policy Number A2. Building Street Address(including Apt.,Unit,Suite,and/or Bldg.No.)or P.O.Route and Box No. 2527 Opa-Locka Blvd. Company NAIC Number City Opa-Locka State FL ZIP Code 33054 A3. Property Description(Lot and Block Numbers,Tax Parcel Number,Legal Description,etc.) Lots 24-27 Block 151 of Plat Book 31,Page 5 A4. Building Use(e.g.,Residential,Non-Residential,Addition,Accessory,etc.) Commercial A5. Latitude/Longitude:Lat.25.89881 N Long.80.24197 W A6. Attach at least 2 photographs of the building if the Certificate is being used to obtain flood insurance. Horizontal Datum: ❑NAD 1927 ® NAD 1983 A7. Building Diagram Number 1 A8. For a building with a crawl space or enclosure(s),provide a) Square footage of crawl space or enclosure(s) N/A sq ft A9. For a ua a footage with o attached garage,provide: q b) No.of permanent flood openings in the crawl space or a) Square footage of attached garage N/A sq ft enclosure(s)walls within 1.0 foot above adjacent grade N/A b) walls of permanent flood ve adjacent in the attached garage c) Total net area of flood openings in A8.b walls within 1.0 foot above adjacent grade N/A N/A sq in c) Total net area of flood openings in A9.b N/A SECTION B-FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP(FIRM)INFORMATION sq in B1. NFIP Community Name&Community Number Opa-Locka,City of 120657 I Miami-Dade mi-Dade County Name Flo Mia ! Florida State B4.Map/Panel Number I 85.Suffix Be.FIRM Index B7.FIRM Panel B8.Flood 89.Base sZone 12025 C 0090 4I Date Effective/Revised Date Zone s J 03/2/1992 03/02/1992 ( ) AO,use base Flood Elevatio flood depthn )() 8 10. Indicate the source of the Base Flood Elevation(BFE)data or base flood depth entered in Item B9. AE 7' I 0 EIS Profile ®FIRM ❑Community Determined 811. lndicate.elevation datum used for BFE in Item B9: ID Other(Describe) ®NGVD 1929 ❑NAVD 1988 0 Other(Describe) B12. Is the building located in a Coastal Barrier Resources System(CBRS)area or Otherwise Protected Area(OPA)? Designation Date ❑CBRS ❑OPA Oyes ®No SECTION C-BUILDING ELEVATION INFORMATION(SURVEY REQUIRED) Cl. Building elevations are based on: `A new Elevation Certificate will be required whentcocnst ction of the building is❑complete.Under Construction' N Finished Construction C2. Elevations-Zones A1-A30,AE;AH,A(with BFE),VE,V1-V30,V(with BEE),AR,AR/A,AR/AE,AR/A1-A30,AR/AH,AR/AO. Complete Items C2.a-g below according to the building diagram specified in Item A7. Benchmark Utilized Miami-Dade County H-370 Vertical Datum 8.58' Conversion/Comments N/A Check the measurement used. a) Top of bottom floor(including basement,crawl space,or enclosure floor)_ 7.68 b) Top of the next higher floor NN/A. c) Bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member(V Zones only) N/A. ®feet ❑meters(Puerto Rico only) d) Attached garage(top of slab) El feet ❑meters(Puerto Rico only) N/A. ®feet ❑meters(Puerto Rico only) e) Lowest elevation of machinery or equipment servicing the building N/A (Describe type of equipment in Comments) El feet ❑meters(Puerto Rico only) f) Lowest adjacent(finished)grade(LAG) 7.1 g) Highest adjacent(finished)grade(HAG) ®feet ❑meters(Puerto Rico only) 7.4 El feet 0 meters(Puerto Rico only) SECTION D-SURVEYOR,ENGINEER,OR ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION This certification is to be signed and sealed by a land surveyor,engineer,or architect authorized by law to certify elevation l information. /certify that the information on this Certificate represents my best efforts to interpret the data available. J I understand that any false statement may be punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S. Code,Section 1001. I l® Check here if comments are provided on back of form. i Certifier's Name Richard J.Minguell �" License Number 6402 Title P.L.S. ! � Company Name R.Minguell,Inc. /Address 2841 ideo I!' City Goo erCi J//4' / Cooper City State FL ZIP Code 33026 Signature j if License ugu t 21,2007 Date August 21,2007 Telephone 954-298-8935 August 21,2007 AMEND TO APPLICATION OF: Subject Property Address: 2527 OPA-LOCKA BLVD OPA-LOCKA FL. 33054-4047 Property Owner Name: O&E East Coast Investments LLC, Property Owner Address: 1385 Marseilles Dr Miami Beach FL. 33141 Applicant Name: AIXA SERRA/LITTLE ONES ACADEMY CORP. "To operate a Child Care Center" Applicant Address: 985 NE 116 ST Biscayne Park, FL 33161 Phone Number: (786)262-3968 Email Address: iittl ., i cii Subject Property Address: 2527 OPA-LOCKA BLVD OPA-LOCKA FL. 33054-4047 Tax folio Number: 08-2122-011-0420(Building) Legal Description: 22 52 41 Community Gardens PB31-5 LOTS 24&25 BLK 151 LOT SIZE 14148 SQ FT Tax folio Number 08-2122-011-0430 (Parking Space) Legal Description: Community Gardens PB 31-5 LOT 26 BLK 151 LOT SIZE 7992 SQ FT Tax folio Number: 08-2122-011-0440(parking Space) Tax folio Number: COMMUNITY GARDENS PB 31-5 LOT 27 BLK 151 LOT SIZE 6156 SQ FT Tax folio Number: 08-2122-011-0410(Playground Area) Legal Description: 22 52 41 COMMUNITY GARDENS PB 31-5 LOT 23 BLK 151 LOT SIZE 6156 SQ FT Present Zoning: B-1,Neighborhood Business; and Application Date: May 27, 2011 From: December 27,2011 Aixa Serra Little Ones Academy Corp. 2527 Opa-Locka Blvd. Opa-Locka, FL 33054 FOLIO#0821220110420 ZONING B-1 Mailing Address: 985 NE 116st Biscayne Park, FL 33161 In reference to conditional use permit to operate a child care center. To: Mr.Gerald J. Lee City Planner Planning&Community Development Mr. Howard W. Brown Director Community Development Code Enforcement I request for reconsideration by writing that I want my application to operate a child care center to be reviewed in the NEXT Planning Council Meeting for February 7, 2012. The decision made by the board on December 6, 2011 was unfair. I suffered the consequences of the poor communication and administration from the city of Opa Locka. I was NEVER notified that the site plan does not indicate allocation of the parking spaces, and so I never had the opportunity to correct the site plan in order to demonstrate it to the commission to review that we have 23 parking spaces available. On July 12, 2011 the staff recommended approval and vice Chairman Burke made a motion to approve the project with the conditions regarding the parking and playground.The motion passed 3-0. I never received anything about the meeting until I called Ms. Oria Rodriguez on November 16,2011 to find out what was going on, I was told almost 4 months later that I had been denied and had to go back to the planning council once again. No one had the courtesy to call me, send me a letter or an email regarding the denial. When I asked Ms.Oria Roriguez what I should do, she told me Mr. Brown would call me right away and explain everything to me. I didn't receive a call until two days later when I finally spoke to him, I asked him what I should bring to the meeting and he said not to worry they have everything. I felt ridiculous at the December 6, 2011 Planning Council Meeting because I was completely unprepared. In addition to that, I was denied for not being prepared. I WILL NOT go to the City Commission without an approved recommendation from the zone and planning board, as you know it will be a negative turn out. After the Planning Council Meeting,Tuesday December 6, 20111 personally went to meet with Mr. Brown on December 7, 2011 so he can explain to me what I needed to fix on the site plan in reference to the parking and play ground. After I met with Mr. Brown I immediately corrected my site plan to meet your requirements and on December 13, 2011 I took Mr. Brown 15 copies of the new and corrected site plan. Mr. Brown and Mr. Lee then reviewed the site plan and said it met the requirements. We look forward to working with the City of Opa-Locka and being part of the commercial community after 10 months of being in this process. Best Regards, Aixa Serra Building Photographs See Instructions for Item A6. For Insurance Company Use: Building Street Address(including Apt, Unit,Suite, and/or Bldg. No.)or P.O. Route and Box No. Policy Number 2527 Opa-Locka Blvd. City Opa-Locka State FL ZIP Code 33054 Company NAIC Number If using the Elevation Certificate to obtain NFIP flood insurance, affix at least two building photographs below according to the instructions for Item A6. Identify all photographs with: date taken; "Front View" and "Rear View"; and, if required, "Right Side View" and "Left Side View." If submitting more photographs than will fit on this page, use the Continuation Page, following. Front View August 21,2007 iell ' -- .-'1' --.-- -----0- ---, ., -. - i'l ' ,„ ,4 P 0, r 1 : la :. .4 -_, ,,,li 1 x 3 '':°::';','' sue"' c ,. .s�°::: , { ¢ 4t.4:y.`s K ' Rear View � August 21,2007 ..►�.�—'rte �r. .. JN 6 IlliLD1N�' D �•� , . _ i;�7 d 954_a�3° .. — ' ''-'';; -%54.'r, i• - f' 1.11111 11111'. I , OIN111111 :.'i- - • . , j I _I I:— I _ 1____ § f \ I I I . IN :•.,41 .1 - ali .1 ti—g - i I b tz 2.'.• - ' 01 I: 1 1 1 . ■ 'T I • I : II -- — lic- . ,..., 1 C..) • ,4,PT-4.1.3 1,..X.,,,-1-s•cro I. '.4411 Cn 1 sz 191 P-4xxxInc.a ,041*.1-.d0 Gaga 42 101 1 t, 1 1-I 1 - •-----4 -- 104--- ,,,-....3 --.11 ...11 ....-bt;13f- -4-..-136:".4 ———•1■11 ki ,•4 . \ • 1 6, -•-_--„, i••P g el I • L\ ,••,,„., :,\_ . -',='.... -,- . 1 .,m .i UJ . ---,q.t., s ,-, I I n ,_. ,,, .■A 0 > .1 ...... ,- — 6.16 Ce ■4,\ '''7 112 101 I D I • k I 1 nm 1 . .. 1 , \ . 'Ll z g.@ E° A . Z L2.1 (D Col 0 V C,I — 714■a/ y, .t.0 , •-i ca LI 0 if..4 ''' ° . '' ° ••`4,0 r..,0-.. no 0 cv 0 -•2 _ I .. , . .. ....z 0 0 ..• ik: Vi . .-: , U.,4••',., •F,"'-4-7,-- ' r. . ... _ & 1 2 E•••• P•''7-"." I' t ''.. It . j .• '4'1; ", ' .t.' : *g. ...e ,.. ..4 f i III nu.< ci. 2 .gz VO It.... = , -g ,. 2.,-; ,... Td 4 t EL, < •" -I I 2.„ • t''; i O.- 1 ; 1 ,...,, .i. g I t .a3,7) «.9,.. al 1 .= .• an 1 g ,,:i ca,-•■o •,:c ‘I. .. I. ',. . .. „.... . . A 100 r ..?.g Z . 1 , , ,,. % sOi ' "'••° .a. Lg 8 -4t ra ....9, = ...,, 0 t,..., • 1 - --' , ..,,,, -.5 2 7.• j • .7..ZtK .'.;,--" ,••,..74 ' 41,' ,' -- .* " , . .,.. ... --;. ., -s,,,., '4:,;•• ' l', ,.4 ' ,2, g 3 ..TO 1 § o ot Elil "E p."Lf .. =-43v2 " •EQ`-''- ff•RE.1'1,t:9;,?.. < • ' — ' .1 K za■ .:Agt.R4FD ..s--EigMei •zpg-lg .E 1,9,8E=m. o 0 t.. ..0., ",,,,:: -: '• - ' '• • .,,, „, ‘,5,.. . ' ° °- - 0 1_,,:a„._ -L.1 iL, t.... a-2 gj 8 .., 11 ...;> - . _., .7.,. a,13.2, : u 24 8 kET9 i °25'.0RM4.=r-f4,l-ks2-1. SAm m 1 -gR,7-; -77,` .2-Q.,,, 88 k2F-Cesial- g4 14,,7,-..EffiR m'll, L'-' ,58.§ g..° g.41,0,25g2-00 ,71211 .,. _ .... _. _ a . 4 ,nj 1. 1.331S mI.#N / 9 0 I / z. 5 , 5 % .* 7. , . , Ca 4 s 44 3 s �, 5 ! \ �• ; �, �• ` ' 2` /' . ® u «. w.y : \ . . . 4 \ 2 Z \: j / § \ I I . Q > / k [ 4 _ ) [ \ ^ • \ § ) 0•k \ < �y \ � / m » e �' ] S < § \ co 2 t G • o.0 2 Z % < 0 - • 2 z § k k ) K < § 7 Ix § & & < Cl)2 2 Z ® § § ® , 0 ° CI) u. G \ ` \ § ) K q < » z 0 0 n 0 j + ) Q ; 4 :a 4 >•• / ( • 2 k n f § } § % en < n ° 2 — �` - L/ k \ § § S. m w _ a j \ § \ \ \ / § § Z « 2 § q / \ / d � liti '/ ' z§ < / < _I ® / 2 � ; 2O / � / i zK $ \�•` �y ( ` � `�� k ) § §: . ( Q $ 2 � I \ § / § § m # a K ® k � . mom ec ON ka ) § \ �' \ Au 3 I ` ; - § \ ) ¢ ,; S ■ (. g€x.VI.) 1- ,a�)Vd § \ 0 ' % ' ( le.4 4 4.4 4 \/© �©\ 44 . § Cl?iVA31nos YNoo?d0 § I- I CD Lt o Q 1- z 9— O W W W Q U W Q O J o < CO Z m = ® CIC U W C/) x— Q 2 W CC °O O 2 w J CO � � � 0 U O U z Q ' � O c - W W U ® m N W Y 1 w Q ® Z I— 3 \ Q < ® I- Z o 4 \ ® Q (N LL 1 \3 N\ Z � ® Q w Ct 04 \\\ D`_ 1— 0 Z ,I r a a a a a a a a a a a a a i i a i i a a a „ . _V co i i i a a a a a a * • a a a a a a a a a a a a a i 0 3C a a a a a a • a a i - i a a a a a a a a a i i i 0.. ' 9 4 * * * a * * t a i a a * * * a * 4 a 3 i i + 4 i 4 * a * 1Yr�•!.... a 4 + 4 + * a * 3 • • i ♦ 3 lA • a a .. s Ci a i ` a a a a a a a a i a a a a a a a a a i a a i • i4I i a ,1 Ihh,_ * a a a a 4 a a a a a a a i i a i i * a a * a ali • \\\ \i a • s \\\ a a•• a . a a aa a `vr ; �• • \ \\\ \\1 \\, a 1 a. , . a a a a a a : a: + :i a H aa a i a s i a a i a�a i ii a a as aaa a.'.�1.i...s..i• ' \\c . ' ' ' y. •�•t ir .?.!'„ \\\\iii.\\\ \\\ k, a a a a a i a a a i (A a 1 a.• - '•,,•. \\\♦c\\\ \\ a a a a Cr) C\i. r i a ..; \\ \v \\ \\\ a a\ a a a s , .. \\\W \\ \\ \ a a a 1 a' ! ' y • - \\\Z\\\\ \\\\ a a i a 9 i \ aaa Q. •a a a aa:. a m \\\.O\\\ W W• • . aa aa '• Lo a • \ a a O � \\\�,\\\ \\\ a aaa 0\\g\\\ \\\ a a O W a \\\ a \ \\ a a > a p_ - \\ \ a i i a i• \ a a a a a a \\\\\\\\\�\\\.01. i a a a • \\\ \\ \a, •r•• •\ \\\ \\ ; . a a i a ,. " r}' a i a ~ : • ♦10\ i '41 ♦ J::+ : ' : : + : .- •• a a a a a a �i a a a i i a a a i i a a • a 4 a a a S *,, -..'L: 1s I n fib. (k. Do c.0 po W X Ali II II II z gto i O z op. .; %,a,�� I 13�d1, off,/-/ X19/')/ U (c)i t�W ° o Do B / • Q¢ f% W Qv • re i• �� /ice "ice s , d 3 3 " b .//- '\ G 34, --i( J1/BM S7tid .J� m J r Ui &•s•,7F• . 4 Q1 -/z , ;,//;. p'Y,/6jo_ \ 8/ y`� a � ti tit f. � n 8s, �, .�ss ' oi �'off, g p ` n Ili P. i,.1. ': ,67/t" F l V A • k\/Z , v Q pp, ti Ni In r N A . ., ik M (0 c'• V o loJ 2i 44 1 Ca g1 5 ii 411111 ° Ef0 ; B Y ir A :!Iii::::'11:- U vi i°o o Q s-.,- t W a � %vc vFa '-' vl• " �a ■ o�zs w w 4k. S I>∎0., 9 3 4� 6�& J ,Li np�o (j Q� C t -,3`/47-d%'v.,an,J,, E,<4o -oo ug �° ' �z Niyp �,Ca 4t Q?//)(g7t7o9 b'0'.2 7 t/d4 !vy r, �.�.� Cj F4 4 ZO N u.0 M Q ,, > x Nf7, f �ea i l v"..1U >. D a a aA4-, aaa Z O •W ' D X • S � u o y g g I g 1' h o urcm i �el 11 8 NI 11 i Lt qS Y S lai w f-,, _ 12 S O 6 m ' ayfmis;s 1.-s ..' Y 4' ilf, 1°4 /%1° gll ag 'it PBltlasa PPw !' s i alt IS N ,_ , 04 . d L� /o .?in uuJdu8�ao Wd881,q J45 '04'1Rfu p leq,Sii"`∎ '''''''114°.°I.0+"' 91 rd ct M 4 i,tl in N " THE GREAT CITY " Of.4 JOANNA FLORES,CMC >�� °9 PLnJ a �� v � (305)953-2800 Interim City Clerk v °�Q� j4;1 Fax: (305)953 2834 t9gogickp OA'ORPS£O April 13, 2012 Dear Property Owner: YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the City Commission of the City of Opa-locka will conduct a Public Hearing on Wednesday,April 25,2012 at 7:00 p.m. at the Opa-locka Municipal Complex, 780 Fisherman Street, 2nd Floor, Opa-locka, Florida to consider the following: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA,FLORIDA,TO APPROVE THE REQUEST 0&E EAST COAST INVESTMENT AIXA SIERRA LITTLE ONES ACADEMY FOR A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A CHILD DAY CARE CENTER IN THE B-1 ZONING DISTRICT;PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF RECITALS;PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. PROPERTYOWNER: 0 & E East Coast Investments, LLC APPLICANT'S NAME: Aixa Serra, Little Ones Academy Corp. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2527 Opa-locka Boulevard Opa-locka, FL 33054 LEGAL DESCRIPTION/FOLIO: 0821220110420-22 52 41 COMMUNITY GARDENS PB 31-5;LOTS 24&25 BLK 151,LOT SIZE 14148 SQ FT 0821220110430 -COMMUNITY GARDENS PB 31-5 LOT 26 BLK 151LOT SIZE 7992 SQ FT 0821220110440 -COMMUNITY GARDENS PB 31-5 LOT 27 BLK 151LOT SIZE 6156 SQ FT 0821220110410-22 52 41 COMMUNITY GARDENS PB 31-5 LOT 23 BLK 151 LOT SIZE 6156 SQ FT REQUEST: To operate a child care center ALL INTERESTED PERSONS ARE ENCOURAGED TO ATTEND THIS MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD WITH RESPECT TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. For further information regarding this matter, please contact our office. PURSUANT TO FS 286.0105: Any person who desires to appeal any decision made by any board, agency or commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing will need a record of the proceedings,and for that reason, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Sincerely, Joanna 'Fiore. Interim City Clerk CITY HALL• 780 FISHERMAN STREET, 4TH FLOOR, OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA 33054 • (305)688-4611 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER AND DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF HANDICAP THE MIAMI HERALD I MiamiHerald.com • ND SUNDAY,APRIL 15,2012 I 17ND IN NEIGHBORS CALENDAR Customer Service •CALENDAR,FROM 16ND Donation.sbiket or4 a.org.. bone pursuing ar rs in the for a t Your Fingertips■ www.msbikeflorida.org. those pursuing careers in the legal DANCE field.. and gherkin olives.. 7 p.m.April 15.Florida Internation- 5 p.m.April 19.Db Bistro Moderne Brazilian Carnival:SAMBA CLASS al University-Legal Studies Institute, Call 1-800-843-4372 and At The Jw Marriott Marquis,255 every MON&amp;WED 2 8pm 11200 SW 8th Street-RDB 1003,. VI Biscayne Blvd.,Downtown Miami. HIRE OUR PERFORMERS.A little 3050348-2491,wwwisi-fiu.edu. ' use our automatic system with Wheels&amp;Meals:Food truck taste of the Brazilian Carnival for Joe Hall Kindergarten Registration our touchtone hone: invasion with Roadrage Magazine your next event Joe Hall Elementary,located at 1901 y p presents Wheels&amp;Meals Food Samba dancers,Samba band, SW 134 Avenue,is currently regis- . Truck Invasion.Join us every Thurs- Samba drummers,Capoeira per- tering Kindergarten students for the day at Tropical Park from 5:30pm to formers,fire dancers,Stilt walker.. 2012-2013 school year.We are proud p: •Press 1 to report a missing, 11pm for the weekly bike car/night 7 p.m.April 16.Carnival Dance to announce that Joe Hall Elementa- ^F-" along with the food truck team.. Studio,1450 Meridian Ave,Miami ry School placed in the top ten 'fit incomplete or damaged newspaper. 5:30 p.m.April19.Tropical Park, Beach.Best price.786-470-6679. percent of all elementary schools in 7900 SW 40 St,Olympia Heights. www.BrazilianCamival.com. the State of Florida in the 2011 Young Talent Big Dreams Semifl- Mlaml Dance Festival Film Night: ranking of Florida schools.. •Press 2 to stop your newspaper nab:Young Talent Big Dreams,the Dancemaker is a film that tells the 9 a.m.April E.Joe Hall Elementa- when you're going out of town. most widespread local youth talent tale of this extraordinary,peculiarly ry,1901 SW 134th Ave.,Tamiami contest in Miami-Dade history,will American company.The film looks at Lakes.joehaltdadeschools.net. ;S culminate in a marathon of semi- the rise of Paul Taylor from solitary Knight for the Day at Archbishop °..Y • 3 to start a new subscription final and final competitions for child to star dancer to master Carley Notre Dame Prep:Our goal is p student performers ages of 8-17.. choreographer.. to provide for applicants a sense of or change your delivery address. 7 p.m.April 21.Actors'Playhouse 8 p.m.April18.Miami Beach what distinguishes ACND as one of ,tit at the Miracle Theatre,280 Miracle Cinematheque at Historic City Hall, the leading college-preparatory Mile,Coral Gables.$10. 1130 Washington Ave.,Miami Beach. schools.Knight for a Day will give 1 • Press 4 to restart your newspaper. 305-444-9293. $10 General Admission/$9 Miami each prospective student the chance ,# www.acjorsplayhoane.org, Dance Festival and MBC Members. to experience life on campus with a F If Zumba Aa?with Fad M Cutler Bay- 305-67 FILM(673-4567). current ACND student.. a "y • Press 5 to access account details Three times weekly:Fun group! www.MBCinema.com. 8:20 a.m.April16.Archbishop "°� Easy and EFFECTIVE routines.... Curley Notre Dame Prep and Middle . 4i-i.. 19 k ,"'c'-',,`"'- or make renewal payments. Zumba is the exercise in disguise! EDUCATION/CAMPUS School Academy,4949 NE Second . '.xve•-r p y Like our FB page:ZumbawithFabi Get buttoned-up with a career In Ave.,Little Haiti,305-751-8367 x 22. •, •. � RECREATION ROOM OF CUTLER the legal profession!:FIU Legal www.acnd.net -d Elie Miami A�LIlL'YlD I® RIDGE PARK Studies Institute(LSI).3,000 gradu- UM School of Architecture Spring t MiamiHerald.com 'NO SIGN UP NECESSARY' aces.3,000 stories.What will yours 2012 Schedule:The School of Archi- CIRC959 Tuesdays and Wednesdays be?For almost three decades,LSI 7pm-8pm has offered comprehensive profes- •TURN TO CALENDAR,18ND TheM:mniH ,1■1:.dig.11.0 F,11.:11I.t.onlri Ghrv,., . ,v: ,:lI'illI1/111, d 1,1y .,,,,,,tidy,,:. ,.x. Saturdays Bam-8:45am. 7 p.m.April 17.Cutler Ridge Park and Po 1.10100SW200thSt.,Cutler SPRING INTO SPRING Bay.$5,386-25ZUMBA. Bay$5 86-25hfabi.com. CYCLING PRICES �} OFF +p+OA -' Slow Food Miami Farm Bike Tony- SLASHED UP TO 70% OF■ ; :.._; Earth Day:Visit our local farms by '- bike for Earth Day.Each farm will Open Sunday to Friday CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA have a taste and tour. Registration at 8:30 am Bee Closed for Shabbat Heaven Farm NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC gam-1 pm Thank you for Your Support Family Event 14 mile Bike Ride NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Commission of the City of Opa-locka,Florida will hold with 4 Local Farm Stops A..,'• I I:7. Ortho Style public hearings at its Regular Commission Meeting on Wednesday,April 25,2012 at 7:00 p.m.at Bee Heaven Farm is located at I i i • I the Opa-locka Municipal Complex,780 Fisherman Street,2n°Floor,Opa-locka,Florida to consider 19000 SW 264th Street,Reiland hi I' a, Bedding the following items: 33031-1787 HOWEVER,the house numbers 's• _ fc,..I�.: from m A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA,TO are out of sequence to here are " GRANT THE REQUEST OF ALL JAPANESE ENGINES HOLDINGS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE more detailed directions: .000 s, �fi79oo" FOR ALUMINUM SMELTING OR REFINING OF METALS IN THE 1-2(LIBERAL INDUSTRIAL) on Bauer Drive(SW 264th Street), - ZONING DISTRICT,AND TO ALLOW OPERATION OF AN ALUMINUM SMELTING OVEN AT THE is mile west of SW 187th Ave 6 PC Queen • • PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2300 NW 150.1 STREET,FOLIO NO.08-2122-025-0110,AS SUBJECT (Reiland Road) rr TO CONDITIONS STATED IN ORDINANCE NO.11-06;PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF Look for the rock pyramid and the i»t.. flags Bedroom Suite �� ... RECITALS;PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Park on the Swale from -` A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA,FLORIDA,TO APPROVE Enter at the west gate,past the THE REQUEST OF 0&E EAST COAST INVESTMENT AIXA SIERRA LITTLE ONES ACADEMY FOR A farm sign. $54 goo :c CONDITIONAL USE FOR A CHILD DAY CARE CENTER IN THE B-1 ZONING DISTRICT,PROVIDING IR 8:30 a.m.April 22.Bee Heaven FOR INCORPORATION OF RECITALS;PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Farm,19000 SW 264th St„Home- - stead.$30.888.580-4480. Additional information on the above items may be obtained in the Office of the City Clerk, wmmermaoodmiaml.org, PC r $r 00 780 Fisherman Street,4'"Floor,Opa-locka,Florida.All interested persons are encouraged to Zimmerman MS Bike Ride:Zimmer- 7 t C Living,Room starting at !99 attend this meeting and will be heard with respect to the public hearing. man Advertising is sponsoring a 2 gull gallery of contemporary,traditional and antique day MS Bike Ride from Homestead & rY P ary PURSUANT TO FS 286.0105:Anyone who desires to appeal any decision made by any board,agency, Miami Speedway to Key Largo for a reproduction furniture from the top manufacturers of or commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing will need a record of total of 150 miles.The ride stops Europe,the Americas and the World the proceedings,and for that reason,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is in Key La Largo John eturns back Park JOHN STEMBRIDGE FURNITURE made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal may be based. in Key Largo and return back to Homestead Miami Speedway on Excellent Service Since 1953 April 22.. 545 NE 125 Street North Marl-Tel:(305)893-0800 JOANNA FLORES,CMC 7 a.m.April 21.Homestead-Miami r Speedway.One Speedway Blvd., uzi28•comcast.net•www.johnstembridge.com INTERIM CITY CLERK Homestead.$40 Registration 8400 c,i E Eic,s4 (,`<co c,-A- k:6 yt---k, Rcici. ( c,-(- /-) O &E EAST COAST 0 &E EAST COAST AIXA SERRA/LITTLE ONES INVESTMENTS LLC INVESTMENTS LLC ACADEMY CORP 1385 MARSEILLES DR 2527 OPA LOCKA BLVD 985 NE 116 ST MIAMI BEACH, FL 33141 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 BISCAYNE PARK, FL 33161 IMRAN ALI CARLOS ALFONSO CHANTELL MOORE 2648 E ATLANTIC AVE 13850 NW 24 AVE 2505 E SUPERIOR ST OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA,FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 JEAN FELON CADET FRED HORNBY CASSANDRA HALL 2559 YORK ST 2511 YORK ST 2434 NW 135 ST OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 MIAMI, FL 33167 LINCOLN YOUNG MARIA TERESA FELICIANO EVERETTE NIEVES 2404 NW 135 ST 2557 YORK ST 2505 YORK ST MIAMI, FL 33167 OPA-LOCKA,FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 THERESA DAVIS WALTER LEE MCCLAIN FRANK BROWN 2385 SUPERIOR ST 2355 SUPERIOR ST 2444 NW 135 ST OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA,FL 33054 MIAMI,FL 33167 FEFE BRANTLEY PIER THOMAS MICHELLE JACKSON 2510 NW 135 ST 2365 SUPERIOR ST 2424 NW 135 ST MIAMI,FL 33167 OPA-LOCKA,FL 33054 MIAMI,FL 33167 JEROME NICHOLS DUNA BAPTISTE JOSE MYRNA VENTURA 2456 NW 135 ST 2490 NW 135 ST 2520 NW 135 ST MIAMI, FL 33167 MIAMI, FL 33167 MIAMI, FL 33167 THE QVH CORP LAKEVIEW APARTMENTS LLC LTBT TRUST 16795 NW 86 CT 531 SW 42 AVE,#116 PO BOX 552359 MIAMI, FL 33016 MIAMI, FL 33134 MIAMI, FL 33055 AD 7 WHOLESALE LLC CLEAN CREDIT COUNSELORS ELISA FLORES 5599 SOUTH UNIVERSITY DR, LLC 15207 SW 24 ST STE. #305 5635 W 14 CT MIAMI, FL 33185 DAVIE, FL 33328 HIALEAH, FL 33012 J EDILBERTO DIAZ ALLER HEATHER ALEXANDER THE DEPOT TRUST 8004 NW 154 ST#147 130 NW 197 ST 758 NW 100 ST MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016 MIAMI, FL 33169 MIAMI, FL 33150 L _TRH KEVIN SMITH, LASHOAN R L CHRISTIE&W EVERETTE STEVEN ROSARIO SINGLETON KINDRED 19620 NW 11 CT 19407 NW 83 PL PO BOX 69-4925 MIAMI,FL 33169 HIALEAH, FL 33015 MIAMI,FL 33269 DEBRA S. GREEN LAMAR CRUSE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING 20130 NW 58 AVE 21001 NW 31 AVE LLC MIAMI, FL 33015 MIAMI GARDENS,FL 33056 490 OPA-LOCKA BLVD, STE 20 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 ALBERT ULYSSE ANTONIO SUSANA ESTELA TAPANEZ 312 NE 118 TER 2606 NW 77 ST 2500 NW 135 ST,B304 MIAMI,FL 33161 MIAMI, FL 33147 MIAMI, FL 33167 OWNER 0 &E EAST COAST ROBIN ANDERSON 2500 NW 135 ST, B805 INVESTMENTS LLC 2571 ATLANTIC AVE MIAMI, FL 33167 2527 OPA LOCKA BLVD OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 RAY L. BARRETT AMY J. REED ELIZABETH HATCHER 2581 E ATLANTIC AVE 2541 ATLANTIC AVE 2520 E SUPERIOR ST OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 DIANN HARRIS THELMA BROWN DOREEN GRIMES 2531 ATLANTIC AVE 2521 ATLANTIC AVE 2511 ATLANTIC AVE OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA,FL 33054 ROSALEE ESCOFFERY REGINA WRIGHT CHRISTIAN BELLA MAE ROBERSON 2642 E ATLANTIC AVE 2510 E SUPERIOR ST 2509 ATLANTIC AVE OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 DAVID EASON BEVERLY JONES ONDINA E RUIZ&EDWARD 2508 SUPERIOR ST 2507 ATLANTIC AVE 2460 E SUPERIOR ST OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 FRANK MCGEE ROBERT&JAMES MARTIN GAMALIEL &CARMEN 2591 E SUPERIOR ST 2561 E SUPERIOR ST RODRIGUEZ OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA,FL 33054 2558 YORK ST OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 EVA MAE GATERS JOYCE PIERRE CAROLYN HALL 2555 E SUPERIOR ST 2556 YORK ST 2545 SUPERIOR ST OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 CHRISTOPHER HANSON EVETTE ABNEY COMFORT LIVING LLC 2552 YORK ST 2535 E SUPERIOR ST 2525 SUPERIOR ST OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA,FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OA&DOROTHY DALY ALBERTHA SCHAROUN LEROY JONES 2519 E SUPERIOR ST 2536 YORK ST 2509 E SUPERIOR ST OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 VESTA JONES JENNIFER FORBES SANTIAGO METRO REALTY OF S FL INC 2507 E SUPERIOR ST 2530 YORK ST C/O VICTOR K RONES PA 18 AVE OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 NORTH NE MIAMI BEACH,FL 33162 GRANADA GARDEN ASSOC MIAMI-DADE COUNTY JENNIFER CONNER LLC C/O BIG LEAGUE MGMT HOUSING AGENCY PO BOX 541073 PO BOX 403353 1401 NW 7 ST OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 MIAMI,FL 33140 MIAMI, FL 33125 ROSALEE ESCOFFERY CUTHBERT JEREMIAH DELLERSON FAMILY LLC 7752 ALHAMBRE BLVD PO BOX 694193 2341 BAYVIEW LN MIRAMAR, FL 33023 MIAMI, FL 33169 NORTH MIAMI, FL 33181 TONY SCOTT METROPOLITAN HOMES LLC JERRYS CUSTOM 7095 HOLLYWOOD BLVD#598 8004 NW 154 ST LANDSCAPING INC HOLLYWOOD, CA 90028 NIIAMI LAKES,FL 33016 6636 SW 33 STREET MIRAMAR, FL 33023 FDC LLC VICTORIA PROPERTY GROUP RUPERT L. CHRISTIE&W 600 NW 183 ST INC EVERETTE MIAMI,FL 33169 PO BOX 430164 19620 NW 11 CT SOUTH MIAMI, FL 33143 MIAMI,FL 33169 GEORGE O. HOLMES Carolyn Hall FDC LLC 751 NE 163 ST 2545 Superior Street 600 NW 183 Street NORTH MIAMI,FL 33162 Opa-locka, Fl 33054 Opa-locka, Fl 33169 Burger King Corporation Southern Bell Justice Trust P 0 Box 020783 1155 Peachtree NE#16G 215 NE 5th Avenue Miami, Fl 33102 Atlanta, Ga 30309 Delray Bch., Fl 33483 LTBT Trust Ella Mae Robertson Rosena Jackson P 0 Box 552359 2509 Atlantic Avenue 2551 Atlantic Avenue Miami,FL 33055 Opa-locka,FL 33054 Opa-locka, Fl 33054 Biscayne Petroleum Granda Grdn. Associates Metro Realty of South Florida 2200 S Dixie Hwy. Ste. 601 c/o Big League Management, Inc do Victor Rones Miami, Fl 33133 P 0 Box 403353 16105 NE 18th Avenue Miami, Fl 33140 North Miami Bch.,Fl 33162 Caribbean Gastronomia Inc Anthony Nieves Jose Ventura&Myrna Ventura 7411 Sabal Drive 2600 NW 135th Street 2520 NW 135th Street Hialeah,Fl 33014 Miami, Fl 33167 Miami, Fl 33167 Duna Baptiste 2490 NW 135th Street Miami, FL 33167 ��i:LOC1�a .fie <0 `a ai�f tgaelikt, r'N uwn1'c..4 Memorandum To: Mayor Myra Taylor Vice Mayor Dorothy"Dottie" Johnson Commissioner Timothy Holmes Commissioner Gail Miller Commissioner Rose Tydus From Bryan K. Finnie, CityItiager ..- Date: April 25, 201f T' Re: Commission Agenda Item — Little Ones Academy Child Day Care Center As you are aware, the City Commission approved a resolution that required a checklist be used in the Community Development Department site plan review process. Attached is an addendum, which is the site plan checklist for Little Ones Academy—Mrs. Aixa Serra. Cc: Dr. Ezekiel Orji, ACM/Finance Director Joe Geller, City Attorney Joanna Flores, Interim City Clerk Newall Daughtrey, CRA Director Attachment End of Memorandum OLCDC 03/08/12 Workshop Requests 1 Site Plan Checklist Planning and Community Development Department L. • 780 Fisherman Street,4`"Floor•Opa-locka,FL 33054 305-953-2868 ext. 1503(tel.) 305-9533060(fax) Contact Information—Developer, Property Owner, or Contractor Name of Applicant / Developer r Property Owner Aixa Serra-Little Ones Academy Corp./0& E East Coast Investments, (Circle One) LLC Site Address/Location 2527 Opa-locka Boulevard, Opa-locka, Florida 33054 - Telephone Number 786-262-3968 305 893 3809 Email Address Aixa Serra [sisilittleonesacademy @yahoo.com] -Date of Application May 27, 2011 Pre-Application Procedures Prior to formal application for approval of any site plan, the applicant shall request and attend a mandatory pre-application conference with the appropriate City official(s) in order to become familiar with the City's development regulations and the subdivision process. At the pre-application conference, the applicant may be represented by his or her land planner, engineer and/or surveyor. Zoning Requirements A property within the City's corporate limits that is being proposed for development must be properly zoned by the City prior to submission of an application for approval of any site plan. In addition, the proposed development layout or design shown on the proposed site plan must be in conformance with all standards and requirements prescribed in the City's Land Development Code City Ordinance No. 86-8 and Miami-Dade County Subdivision Regulations adopted by City Ordinance No, 85-5 Completeness of Application Site Plan applications which do not include all required information and materials, as outlined below and per other City policies which may change from time to time, will be considered incomplete, shall not be accepted for official submission by the City, and shall not be scheduled on a Planning Council agenda until the proper information is provided to City officials. Applicability Administrative Site plan review and approval shall be required for all nonresidential, mixed-use, townhouse, single-family attached and multi-family residential projects and structures and for any condition of special exception or conditional use as required by the Mayor and City Commission. Exceptions 1 Site plan review shall not be required for single-family residential developments, unless the proposed . subdivision will include a private amenity, facility or a golf course. In these instances, site plan submission and approval will be required for the private amenity or facility, or the golf course clubhouse/hospitality area. Site Plan Checklist The proposed site plan shall show the following information (other physical and engineering data shall be included in the engineering plans or as separate documents): Lb. 8- Q Cr C - 1. A title block within the lower right hand corner of the site plan with the proposed name X of the project/subdivision, total site acreage, and the location of the property according to the abstract and survey records of Miami-Dade County 2. The name and address of the owner/developer and the land planner, engineer, X X architect or surveyor responsible for the plan 3. The scale of the drawing (both written and graphic scale) X X 4. The date the drawing was prepared X X 5. Zoning X X 6.A vicinity or location map showing the location of the proposed development within X X the City and in relationship to existing roadways 7. The boundary survey limits of the tract and each proposed lot/tract and scale X X distances with north clearly indicated 8. The names of adjacent additions or subdivisions or the name of the owners of record X with north clearly indicated and recording information for adjacent parcels of unpiatted land, including parcels on the other sides of roads, canals, etc 9. The existing zoning and existing/proposed uses on adjacent land; X 10_ The location, width and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways X X within or adjacent to the tract 11.Any existing easements,with recording information X X 12. Existing buildings - IT( 13: Railroad rights-of-way X 14. Topography(contours at two-foot intervals)with existing drainage channels or X creeks including the 100-year flood plain, if applicable 15.Any other important natural features, such as wetlands, wildlife habitats, and all X substantial natural vegetation 16. Proposed strategies for tree preservation including showing individual trees or tree X masses that will be preserved, and the techniques that will be used to protect them during construction 17_ The layout and width (right-of-way lines and curb lines) of existing and proposed X thoroughfares, collector streets and/or intersections, and specific configuration of proposed streets 18. Lot/tracts and blocks – X X 19. Proposed driveways including driveway widths and distances between driveways X X 20_ Proposed median openings and left turn lanes on future divided roadways and X existing and planned driveways on the opposite side of divided roadways must also be shown for coordination and sharing of future median openings 21. Specific locations and footprints of buildings, including but not limited to proposed X X nonresidential and residential densities 22. Building heights �— X I X 23. Square footages (for multi-tenant or multi purpose buildings, show square footage X X_ 2 for each intended_use), massing, orientation 24. Loading/service areas (including proposed screening) X -25. Recycling containers, compactors and dumpster enclosures(including proposed X screening) X 26. Pedestrian walkways 27. Parking areas (including parking ratio calculations) X X 28. Any proposed sites for parks, schools,public facilities,public or private open space X X 29. Flood plains/drainage ways X X 30. All proposed and existing utilities and easements X X 31. Drainage structures .X X 32. Retention/detention ponds with proposed aesthetic treatments X 33. Screening walls; fences X X 34. Signage location X 35. Fire lanes and fire hydrants X X 36. Lighting __. _w_ X 37. Visibility easements X 38. Other pertinent development related features _ X trees to be planted, and irrigation plans, if required X 40. Color building facade (elevation) plans showing elevations with any attached (wall- X mounted) signage to be used, as determined appropriate by the City Manager, or his/her designee. Effect of Approval The approval of a site plan shall be effective for a period of twelve (12) months beyond the date that the plan was approved by the City Commission. If this is not accomplished, then the approved site plan shall be deemed to have expired and shall become null and void. Revisions to Approved Site Plan Minor Revisions/Amendments-it is recognized that final architectural and engineering design may necessitate minor changes in the approved site plan. In such cases, the City Manager, or his/her designee, shall have the authority to approve minor modifications to an approved site plan and which shall be submitted as an "amended site plan," which substantially conforms to the previously approved site plan, provided that such modifications do not significantly change traffic circulation, building location(s) on the site, proximity of building(s)to nearby residential areas, increase the size or height of building(s), or any other conditions specifically attached as part of the City Council's approval of the site plan. Submission materials and requirements for approval of an amended site plan shall be as determined by the City Manager or his/her designee. If the City Manager, or his/her designee, refuses to approve an amended site plan, then the applicant shall re-submit the amended site plan as a "revised site plan", whereupon the revised site plan shall be scheduled for consideration by the Planning Council and City Commission Major Revisions- In the event of revisions that are more extensive in nature and do not conform to the description for minor amendments above, a "revised site plan" must be resubmitted, reviewed by the City Manager, or his/her designee, and reconsidered by the Planning Council and City Commission. Developer's Agreement-A Developer's agreement may be required for all development except for single-family homes or duplexes pursuant to Section 4.16 of City Ordinance No 86-8. Applicant's Name _ Aixa Serra, 7. Address 1385 Mar_-'iiles Dr. iami Beach Fl 33141 fia 1v6'b' G�,.�' Signed._ — 3 t My signature certifies that I have been provided with a copy of the site plan checklist and have also had a pre-conference meeting with the Planning and Community Development staff. Reviewed by Planning Staff Gerald Lee _ _ Date of Pre-Conference Meeting December 13, 2011 Date of Site Plan Review March 6 2012 4