HomeMy Public PortalAbout06/17/1996MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM,
FLORIDA, ON MONDAY, JUNE 17, 1996, AT 8:30 A.M. IN THE TOWN HALL, 100
SEA ROAD, GULF STREAM, FL.
I. Call to order. The meeting was called to order at 8:30 A.M. by
Chairman Wilson.
II. Roll Call.
Present and Howard E.N. Wilson
CParticipating: William Lynch
Fred Devitt III
Sara Winston
R.W. Hopkins
Absent with Notice: Susanna Souder
Also Present and E. Scott Harrington
Participating: William Thrasher
Tracey Biagiotti
Mark Marsh
Rustem Kupi
Ronald Miller
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Board Member
Board Member
Alternate Board Member
Board Member
Town Manager
Asst. to Town Manager
Asst. Town Attorney
Agent for Messrs.
Smith & Wheeler
Agent for Mr. Pulte
Agent for Mr. Nicholl
III. Minutes of the Recrular MeetincriruDiic nearinu UL riuY Za, �» v.
Mr. Devitt moved, and Mrs. Winston seconded, that the minutes be
approved as circulated and all voted AYE.
IV.
were no changes requested.
V. Announcements.
A. Meeting Dates
1. July 8, 1996 at 8:30 A.M. in the Town Hall (Monday)
2. September 25, 1996 at 8:30 A.M. in the Town Hall (Wednesday)
3. October 30, 1996 at 8:30 A.M. in the Town Hall (Wednesday)
Chairman Wilson made these announcements.
VI. Public Hearinas.
A. Applications for Development Approval
Chairman Wilson asked all of those wishing to speak on any of the
items to stand and be sworn whereupon Assistant Attorney Biagiotti
administered the oath to Mr. Marsh, Mr. Kupi, Mr. Pulte and Mr.
Miller.
1. Mark Marsh of Digby Bridges, Marsh and Associates as Agent
for Carl W. Smith, owner of the property located at 1919 N.
Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, FL that is legally described as
Lot 1, Wm. H. Evans Subdivision.
Mr. Marsh presented a site plan of the property, outlining in orange
the structures to be removed and outlining in yellow the structures to
be built. He indicated that most of the existing vegetation will be
maintained or relocated. The vegetation to be relocated will be
temporarily transplanted to a holding area on the west end of the
property where it will be irrigated. Mr. Marsh noted further that the
Architectural Review & Planning Board page 2
Public Hearing/Regular Meeting
June 17, 1996
perimeter plantings along AlA, as well as the existing curb cut, will
remain unchanged. However, within the property, the driveway will be
re-routed to create a more dramatic entrance.
Mr. Marsh then focused on the proposed home, noting the U -shape of the
footprint and the courtyard with encircling verandah. He reviewed the
floor plan in detail and noted the symmetry and formal elements of the
home.
Mr. Marsh described the style of the home as "island colonial'' and
showed a colored perspective of the east side and the finish elements
to be incorporated such as: a gray, cement -tile roof; a 7/12 roof
pitch with a 4/12 break near the eaves; off-white stucco walls; white
window trim with green shutters; plantation shutters over some first
floor windows; and covered porches with Chippendale handrails. He
closed his presentation by stating he felt it would be a great
addition to Gulf Stream and the particular site.
Mr. Harrington reviewed his report wherein he recommended approval of
the Land Clearing Permit and North Ocean Boulevard Landscape
Disturbance Permit, as proposed, based on a finding that all of the
applicable requirements had been met. Mr. Harrington noted that the
Land Clearing Permit involved the addition of about three feet of fill
and that perhaps Mr. Marsh would want to review this with the Board.
Continuing with his report, Mr. Harrington said that he also
recommended approval of the Level 3 Architectural/Site Plan with three
conditions: 1) that a minimum 5 foot fence or wall be provided to
enclose the pool area as per County building requirements; 2) that the
pool storage area have a minimum 15 foot setback from the west
property line; and 3) the applicant submit north and south elevations
for the garage that comply with all applicable standards in the Design
Manual. Referring to these conditions, Mr. Harrington stated that an
updated plan has been provided to staff that shows a 15 -foot setback
for the pool storage building.
In response to Mr. Harrington's report, Mr. Marsh reviewed the
proposed first floor elevation and need for fill. He stated that at
+20 feet NGVD, the floor is 1.5 feet above the crown of AlA, which is
the maximum permissible floor elevation for this property. He pointed
out that the tee boxes for the adjacent 18th hole of the golf course
also were set at +20 feet NGVD. Mr. Marsh also stated that he
believed his office had dropped off plans for the two garage
elevations noted in Mr. Harrington's report, but in any case, the
plans were not available for review at the meeting. Mr. Marsh did
say, though, that the elevations were in keeping with the others
presented and would be shown to the Town Commission at the next
meeting.
Mr. Lynch stated he thought it was a beautiful house and a good site
design. These comments were echoed by Mr. Devitt and Mr. Wilson as
well.
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing/Regular Meeting
June 17, 1996
page 3
a. DEMOLITION PERMIT -To permit the demolition of existing
structures on this property.
(This item was covered in the motion regarding the Level 3
Architectural/Site Plan Review.)
b. LAND CLEARING PERMIT -To permit the removal/relocation of
significant vegetation and to add fill.
Mr. Lynch moved, and Mr. Devitt seconded, that approval of a Land
Clearing Permit be recommended to the Town Commission based on a
finding that the plans and documents submitted by the applicant, as
proposed, meet all applicable permitting criteria. Roll Call: Mr.
Devitt; AYE, Mr. Hopkins; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE;
Chairman Wilson; AYE. There was no comment from the public.
c.NORTH OCEAN BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE DISTURBANCE PERMIT -To
permit improvements and landscape alterations within the
historic corridor.
Hearing no comments from the public, Mr. Lynch moved, and Mrs. Winston
seconded, that approval of a North Ocean Boulevard Landscape
Disturbance Permit be recommended to the Town Commission based on a
finding that the plans and documents submitted by the applicant, as
proposed, meet all applicable permitting criteria. Roll Call: Mr.
Devitt; AYE, Mr. Hopkins; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE;
Chairman Wilson; AYE.
d. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW -To permit the
construction of a two-story, single family dwelling and
accessory structures at this location.
Chairman Wilson asked for public comments and there were none. Mr.
Lynch moved, and Mr. Hopkins seconded, that approval of a Level 3
Architectural/Site Plan Review be recommended to the Town Commission
based on the plans and documents submitted by the applicant and a
finding that the following conditions are necessary for the proposed
improvements, including demolition of the existing structures, to be
consistent with applicable review criteria: 1) a minimum 5 foot fence
or wall shall be provided to enclose the pool area as per County
building requirements; 2) the pool storage building shall have a
minimum 15 foot setback from the west property line; and 3) the
applicant shall submit north and south elevations for the garage which
shall comply with all applicable standards of the Design Manual. Roll
Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mr. Hopkins; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs.
Winston; AYE; Chairman Wilson; AYE.
2. Mark Marsh of Digby Bridges, Marsh and Associates as agent
for Chris D. Wheeler, contract purchaser of the property
located at 24 Hidden Harbour Drive, Gulf Stream, Florida,
which is legally described as Lot 4, Hidden Harbour Estates.
Mr. Marsh presented a plan which showed the setback variances granted
to a previous application for the same property. He indicated that in
most instances, the proposed home had setbacks that were 50% greater
than what had previously been approved.
Mr. Marsh noted that the proposed floor area variance resulted from
two things. First, the Design Manual provides for a simulated right-
of-way along private roads whereby the first 10 feet of property from
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing/Regular Meeting
June 17, 1996
page 4
the edge of the private road is not counted as part of the lot area.
Second, the design of the home includes a large covered patio area.
Together, these two items cause the square footage of the home to
exceed the maximum permitted floor area by 295 square feet. According
to Mr. Marsh, were the assumed right-of-way not deducted from the lot
area calcualtion, the home could be 500 square feet larger. He then
presented drawings showing a trellis in place of a portion of the
covered patio should the Board not approve the variance.
Plans for the home were presented next by Mr. Marsh. He pointed out
that the lot is unusual in that it is quite a bit wider than it is
deep. As a result, the home has a linear appearance along the street
that he has attempted to break up on the elevations by using varying
eave heights, some decorative elements and trellises. Despite the
long length of the home along the street, Mr. Marsh noted a great deal
of open space is left on the east end of the property where the
property has a high visibility from the main portion of Hidden Harbour
Drive as you come down the hill heading west.
After reviewing the floor plans for both the first and second floors,
Mr. Marsh reviewed the exterior in some detail. Mr. Marsh presented a
perspective of the rear of the house and described the design as a
"Venetian'' Mediterranean. Exterior elements include: hand -formed,
clay barrel tile; stucco walls; a coquina block inlay around the front
doors; cypress trellises; wood out lookers on the second floor with
enclosed eaves for the one-story elements; and a stone balustrade
along the second floor balcony. Turning to the elevations for the
other three sides, Mr. Marsh noted that the home has a -'four-sided''
design in that all four sides of the home were carefully thought out
and planned. Common design elements and themes are reflected in each
of the sides.
At the completion of Mr. Marsh's presentation, Mr. Harrington reviewed
his report and recommendations. Mr. Harrington noted that the
requested floor area variance normally would be reviewed as a Special
Exception. However, because the site has been granted other variances,
Special Exceptions are not permitted as such and must be treated as
variances. Article IV, Section E.2. of the Design Manual permits roof
projections to exceed the maximum floor area by up to 300 square feet
by Special Exception, provided certain standards are met. In this
case, Mr. Harrington noted, the home exceeds the maximum floor area by
295 square feet due to the large covered patio area in the back.
Mr. Harrington stated that he found the requested floor area variance
to be consistent with both the variance and Special Exception criteria
and recommended approval with the condition that the owner record a
deed restriction that would prohibit enclosing any portion of the
covered patio or adding additional square footage to any part of the
house or property. Mr. Harrington went on to say that he found the
proposed home and site plan met all applicable Architectural/Site Plan
Review criteria with the following three conditions: 1) a minimum 5
foot fence or wall be provided to enclose the pool as per County
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing/Regular Meeting
June 17, 1996
page 5
building requirements; 2) the fountain north of the pool deck maintain
a minimum 9 foot setback from the canal as per the previously approved
rear/water setback variance for minor accessory structures; and 3)
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant
record a deed restriction which prohibits the future enclosure of the
covered patio area or the addition of floor area as currently
calculated in the Design Manual.
Mr. Lynch asked Mr. Marsh if the owner was agreeable to Mr.
Harrington's conditions and Mr. Marsh indicated he was. Mr. Lynch
also indicated that he thought it was good-looking home and Chairman
Wilson agreed.
a. VARIANCE -To permit the square footage of a proposed two-
story dwelling to exceed the maximum permitted Floor Area
Ratio by 300 square feet at this location.
Hearing no comments from the public, Mr. Lynch moved, and Mrs. Winston
seconded, that approval of a Variance be recommended to the Town
Commission to permit 295 square feet of additional floor area based on
the plans and documents submitted by the applicant and a finding that
the following condition is necessary for the proposed improvements to
be consistent with the applicable Variance criteria and the Special
Exception criteria found in Article IV, Section E.2. of the Gulf
Stream Design Manual; prior to the issuance of Certificate of
Occupancy, the applicant shall record a deed restriction that
prohibits the enclosure of the covered patio area or the addition of
floor area as currently calculated in the Design Manual. Roll Call:
Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mr. Hopkins; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE;
Chairman Wilson; AYE.
b. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW -To permit the
construction of a two-story, single family dwelling and
accessory structures at this location.
Mr. Lynch moved, and Mr. Hopkins seconded, that approval of a Level 3
Architectural/Site Plan Review be recommended to the Town Commission
based on the plans and documents submitted by the applicant and a
finding that the following conditions are necessary for the proposed
improvements to be consistent with the applicable review criteria: 1)
a minimum 5 -foot fence or wall shall be provided to enclose the pool
area as per County building requirements; 2) the fountain north of the
pool deck shall maintain a minimum 9 -foot setback from the canal as
per the previously approved rear/water setback Variance for minor
accessory structures; and 3) prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy, the applicant shall record a deed restriction which
prohibits the future enclosure of the covered patio area or the
addition of floor area as currently calculated in the Design Manual.
Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mr. Hopkins; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs.
Winston; AYE; Chairman Wilson; AYE. There was no comment from the
public.
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing/Regular Meeting
June 17, 1996
page 6
3. Rustem Kupi and Mark Vigneault of Kupi & Vigneault
Architects as agents for Ocean Breeze Ltd., contract
purchaser of the properties located at 560 Old School Road
and 570 Wright Way, Gulf Stream, Florida, which are legally
described as Lot 10 and Lot 11, Block 3, Polo Fields #1
Subdivision.
Mr. Kupi presented two surveys, one showing the location of the
existing home, which covers both lots, and the other showing the
proposed lot lines for the two proposed lots. Mr. Kupi stated that
the existing home and all related improvements would be demolished to
make way for two new homes.
Referring to his report, Mr. Harrington noted that the property
originally contained two lots which were combined when the existing
house was built. Since that time, the Town has changed its minimum
lot area requirements, which the eastern original lot (Lot 10) no
longer meets. As a result, two new lots must be configured with each
having a minimum 16,500 square feet of dry land area and at least 100
feet of width. He went on to say that he found both the proposed
subdivision and Architectural/Site Plan Review for the demolition met
all applicable criteria and that he recommended approval of both.
a. DEMOLITION PERMIT -To permit the demolition of existing
structures on this property.
Chairman Wilson asked for public comments and there were none. Mr.
Lynch moved, and Mr. Devitt seconded, that approval of a Level 3
Architectural/Site Plan Review be recommended to the Town Commission
to permit demolition of the existing home and improvements based on a
finding that the site plan, as proposed, meets all applicable review
standards. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mr. Hopkins; AYE, Mr. Lynch;
AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE; Chairman Wilson; AYE.
b. SUBDIVISION REVIEW -To permit the replatting of this
property into two new parcels of 17,123 square feet of
effective lot area and 27,990 square feet of effective
lot area.
Hearing no comment from the public, Mr. Lynch moved, and Mr. Devitt
seconded, that approval of a two -lot subdivision be recommended to the
Town Commission based on a finding that the lot sizes and dimensions,
as proposed, meet all applicable review standards. Roll Call: Mr.
Devitt; AYE, Mr. Hopkins; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE;
Chairman Wilson; AYE.
4. Rustem Kupi and Mark Vigneault of Kupi & Vigneault
Architects as agents for Ocean Breeze Ltd., contract
purchaser of the properties located at 560 Old School Road,
Gulf Stream, Florida, legally described as Lot 10 and part
of Lot 11, Block 3, Polo Fields #1 Subdivision.
Mr. Kupi reviewed the plans for the proposed one-story, new home,
noting its Bermuda architecture through the incorporation of stucco
walls, white cement tile roof, use of muntins, and louvered shutters.
He said that fill would be necessary to raise the first floor up to
the proposed 7'-8" elevation; however, the lot would slowly rise up
to meet this with the pool deck at 5'-11" and the back yard at 41-
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing/Regular Meeting
June 17, 1996
page 7
9" Lastly, he pointed out the very tall existing hedge along Old
School Road that would be maintained to screen the three -car garage
from the street.
Mr. Devitt asked Mr. Harrington about any requirements for garages
facing the street. Mr. Harrington stated that only lots of 20,000
square feet or greater must have their garage doors screened from the
street. However, because a three -car garage is unusual, if the Board
wanted to include maintenance of the hedge as a condition, that would
be reasonable.
Mrs. Winston inquired as to the proposed location of the curb cut
relative to the existing curb cuts. Mr. Kupi presented an aerial
photograph of the property, pointing out the existing driveway
location and the proposed. The aerial also showed the existing hedge.
In summarizing his report, Mr. Harrington referred to the landscape
drawings and said that he found the project, as proposed, meets all
applicable Land Clearing Permit criteria. He also stated that he
found the house and site plans to be consistent with all applicable
Architectural/Site Plan Review criteria, with three conditions: 1) a
minimum 5 foot fence or wall be provided to enclose the pool area as
per County building regulations; 2) a minimum of 40% open space be
provided in the front yard in accordance with the Design Manual; and
3) the driveway material shall conform to the requirements of the
Design Manual.
Mr. Harrington noted that the applicant had provided a letter
indicating they would reduce the size of the motor court in front of
the house as necessary to meet the minimum 40% open space criteria.
Mr. Kupi then added that the proposed driveway would be made of paver
blocks, to which Mr. Harrington stated that that would be consistent
with the Design Manual.
a. LAND CLEARING -To permit removal and relocation of
existing plant material that falls within the proposed
building footprint.
Hearing no comment from the public, Mr. Lynch moved, and Mrs. Winston
seconded, that approval of Land Clearing Permit be recommended to the
Town Commission based on a finding that the plans and documents
submitted by the applicant, as proposed, meet all applicable
permitting criteria. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mr. Hopkins; AYE,
Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE; Chairman Wilson; AYE.
b. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW -To permit the
construction of a one-story, single family dwelling and
accessory structures at this location.
Mr. Lynch moved, and Mr. Devitt seconded, that approval of a Level 3
Architectural/Site Plan Review be recommended to the Town Commission
based on the plans and documents submitted by the applicant and a
finding that the following conditions are necessary for the proposed
improvements to be consistent with all applicable review criteria: 1)
a minimum 5 -foot fence or wall shall be provided to enclose the pool
area as per County building requirements; 2) a minimum 40% open space
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing/Regular Meeting
June 17, 1996
shall be provided in the front yard in accordance with the
requirements of the Design Manual; 3) the driveway shall be
constructed of paver blocks in accordance with the requirements of the
Gulf Stream Design Manual; and 4) the existing hedge along Old School
Road shall be maintained to screen views of the garage from the
street. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mr. Hopkins; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE,
Mrs. Winston; AYE; Chairman Wilson; AYE. There was no comment from
the public.
5. Ronald H. Miller as agent for Ramon V. Nicholl, owner of the
property located at 544 Banyan Road, Gulf Stream, Florida,
legally described as Lot 6, Polo Cove Subdivision.
Referring to the site plan, Mr. Miller stated that the Nicholls
proposed to do some renovations, which included: enclosing an outside
stairway leading to the second floor over the garage; changing the
driveway to loose Chattahoochee; removing part of an existing screen
enclosure and adding a Florida room; adding a small deck on the west
side in lieu of an existing concrete stoop; and constructing a gazebo
in the back.
Chairman Wilson asked if Mr. Miller had some type of rendering of the
back of the home in the area of the Florida room. Mr. Miller replied
that he submitted everything he had and had nothing additional to
present at the meeting. Mr. Wilson said he wanted to get a better
idea of what the windows and opening in the Florida room would look
like.
Mr. Wilson then inquired about the proposed wall to be constructed at
the east end of the pool deck. Mr. Miller said that the wall was
intended to serve a focal point for the pool area, and that they had
already changed the design once based on previous discussions with Mr.
Harrington. However, after they submitted the new design, Mr.
Harrington informed them the wall design still did not meet the code
as it was too high for being so close to the canal. Mr. Miller said
he discussed this latest problem with his clients and they agreed to
reduce the wall to five feet and remove the trellis that was to be on
top.
Mr. Harrington reviewed his report and noted that there were a number
of items to be reviewed. These include: the gazebo, enclosing the
stair, a dock, changing the driveway material, the deck, the Florida
room, and the wall. Each of these items, according to Mr. Harrington,
required approval of Level 3 Architectural/Site Plan Review. In
addition, he continued, the deck required approval of a Special
Exception as the west side of the deck was to match the existing west
wall of the house which encroached into the west side setback.
Regarding the Special Exception for the side back for the deck, Mr.
Harrington stated that he found the request met all applicable
criteria and recommended approval with the condition that lighting for
the deck be wall -mounted in an effort to keep lights from shining onto
the adjacent property to the west.
Architectural Review & Planning Board page 9
Public Hearing/Regular Meeting
June 17, 1996
Regarding the Architectural/Site Plan Review, Mr. Harrington said he
found the gazebo, stair enclosure, dock, and driveway material to meet
all applicable criteria and he recommended approval with no
conditions. The deck, Mr. Harrington continued, also meets the
Architectural/Site Plan Review criteria and he recommended approval
with the condition that the lighting be wall -mounted.
Mr. Harrington said he found the Florida room addition to be minimally
consistent with the standards in the Design Manual and recommended
approval with the proviso that the applicant and Board give further
consideration to adding more muntins in the rear doors, side lights
and transoms. Lastly, Mr. Harrington pointed out that the wall, as
shown on the drawing in the packet, could not be approved, but with
the changes proposed by Mr. Miller of keeping the wall to five feet
with no trellis, the wall would meet the code and could be approved.
Mr. Miller responded to Mr. Harrington's findings and recommendations
by stating that he and his client believe the doors, side lights and
transoms are fine as drawn, but if the Board insists, they will add
more muntins. Mr. Lynch and Mr. Hopkins both indicated they felt the
design was fine, while Mr. Wilson indicated that the roof overhang
would soften the appearance and that the drawing likely made the glass
appear more stark than it will actually appear.
a. SPECIAL EXCEPTION -To permit the addition of a sun deck
that will extend a non -conforming wall line of the
existing structure.
Chairman Wilson asked for comments from the public and there were
none. Mr. Devitt moved, and Mr. Lynch seconded, that approval be
recommended to the Town Commission of a Special Exception for the deck
to match an existing non -conforming wall and thereby reduce the
minimum west side setback of the deck by 4.67 feet from 15 to 10.33
feet based on a finding that the building and site plans submitted by
the applicant meet all applicable specific and general Special
Exception standards, with the condition that all lighting for the deck
shall be wall -mounted provided, however, that security lighting
independent of the deck may be used along the west side of the house.
Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mr. Hopkins; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs.
Winston; AYE; Chairman Wilson; AYE.
b. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW -To permit
enclosing an existing stairway, enclosing an existing
screened area to increase living area, construction of a
gazebo and a landscape wall.
Hearing no comment from the public, Mr. Lynch moved, and Mr. Hopkins
seconded, that approval of Level 3 Architectural/Site Plan Review for
the gazebo, stairway enclosure, driveway surface change, dock, deck,
Florida room, and wall be recommended to the Town Commission based on
the plans and documents submitted by the applicant and a finding that
the follow conditions are necessary for the proposed improvements to
be consistent with all applicable review criteria: 1) lighting for the
deck shall be wall -mounted provided, however, that security lighting
independent of the deck may used along the west side of the house; and
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing/Regular Meeting
June 17, 1996
page 10
2) the wall be five feet or less in height and comply with all other
design requirements of the Design Manual. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt;
AYE, Mr. Hopkins; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE; Chairman
Wilson; AYE.
VII. Items by staff.
A. Construction in Progress in May 1996.
The report showed there to be $5,332,570 worth of construction in
progress. Several Board members noted how the report was considerably
smaller than previous reports. Mr. Harrington replied that he has
worked closely with the county to bring the report up-to-date and
hoped to clear off many of the remaining 336 Miscellaneous permits
within the next month.
VIII. Items by Board Members. Mr. Devitt inquired as to whether a
sculpture recently installed on a property on Polo Drive in the area
of Palm Way was in conformity with the code. Mr. Harrington responded
that he had seen the sculpture and didn't know when it went in. Mr.
Devitt and Mr. Wilson both said it went in after the Design Manual was
adopted and that they did not believe it met the code. Mr. Harrington
said he would look into it.
Mr. Harrington and Board discussed some of the ongoing construction
projects and the items to be heard on next month's agenda.
VIII. Public. There was no comment from the public.
X. Adjournment. Chairman Wilson adjourned the meeting at 10:20
on a motion to do so by Mr. Lynch, which was seconded by Mr. Devitt,
with all voting in the affirmative.
�/ ��
S o rrTown Manager
er