HomeMy Public PortalAbout02/26/1997REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND
PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM, FLORIDA ON WEDNESDAY,
FEBRUARY 26, 1997, AT 8:30 A.M., IN THE TOWN HALL, 100 SEA ROAD, GULF
STREAM, FLORIDA.
I. Call to order. Chairman Wilson called the meeting to order at
8:30 A.M.
II. Roll Call.
Present and
Participating
Also Present and
Participating
Howard E.N. Wilson
William Lynch
Fred Devitt III
Susanna Souder
Sara Winston
E. Scott Harrington
John Randolph
Rita Taylor
Mark Marsh
Cynthia Neeves
Betsy Hvide
Margaret Hupfel
Donald McGraw
Deborah Sargeant
Roger Saberson
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Town Manager
Town Attorney
Town Clerk
Agent for Sergeant
Resident
Resident
Resident
Resident
Applicant
Attorney
III. Minutes of the Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of 1-22-97.
Mr. Lynch moved and Mr. Devitt seconded that the minutes be
approved as circulated and all voted AYE at roll call.
IV. Additions, withdrawals. deferrals. arrangement of agenda items.
There were no changes in the agenda requested.
V. Announcements.
A. Meeting Dates
1. March 26, 19
2. April 23, 19
3. May 28, 1997
4. June 25, 1997
5. July 23, 1997
Chairman Wilson made these
97 at 8:30 A.M.
97 at 8:30 A.M.
at 8:30 A.M.
at 8:30 A.M.
at 8:30 A.M.
announcements.
VI. PUBLIC HEARING.
A. Applications for Development Approval
Chairman Wilson asked for those persons who wanted to speak in regard to
any of the matters that will be considered at the Public Hearing to
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing - February 26, 1997
Page 2
please stand and be sworn. The Town Clerk administered the Oath to the
following: Cynthia Neeves, Betsy Hvide, Margaret Hupfel, Donald McGraw,
Perry O'Neal and Roger Saberson.
Inasmuch as the Agent for the first two applications had not yet
arrived, Chairman Wilson directed that Items 3 and 4 be considered at
C' this time.
3. An application submitted by H. Frank Lahage and Assoc-
iates, Inc., as agent for Mr. & Mrs. David Grissom, owners
of the property located at 1535 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf
Stream, Florida, legally described in metes and bounds in
Section 10, Township 46 South, Range 43 East.
Town Manager Harrington stated he was not sure that anyone would be
appearing to present this application but that he would do so at this
time.
a. SIGN REVIEW -To permit the erection of a contractors
sign on the property described herein.
Mr. Harrington stated that the applicant is requesting to place a
contractors sign, not to exceed 6 square feet, that would be set
eastward of the west property line approximately 501. He further stated
that the sign would be white with black letters. Mr. Harrington closed
by advising that he is recommending approval of the sign permit as the
request is consistent with all applicable review standards.
Mr. Lynch moved and Mrs. Winston seconded that the contractor's sign and
location be approved based on a finding that the plans and documents
submitted by the applicant meet all applicable Sign Review criteria.
Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs.
Winston; AYE, and Chairman Wilson; AYE,.
4. An application submitted by H. Frank Lahage and Assoc-
iates, Inc., as agent for Mr. & Mrs. Paul Malnove, owners
of the property located at 1555 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf
Stream, Florida, legally described in metes and bounds in
Section 10, Township 46 South, Range 43 East.
a. SIGN REVIEW -To permit erection of a contractors sign
on the property described herein.
Town Manager Harrington advised that this request is identical to the
one for the property owned by Mr. & Mrs. Grissom. He repeated that the
proposed sign would be white with black letters, would not exceed 6
square feet and would be located a minimum of 50' from the front
property line. He recommended that approval be granted in that the
applicant has met all applicable Sign Review criteria.
Mr. Lynch moved and Mrs. Winston seconded that approval be granted as
requested based on a finding that the plans and documents submitted by
the applicant meet all applicable Sign Review criteria. Roll Call: Mr.
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing - February 26, 1997
Page 3
Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE, and
Chairman Wilson; AYE.
Chairman Wilson directed that Applications 1. and 2. be considered at
this time with Mr. Harrington handling the presentation until such time
as Mr. Marsh arrives.
C1. An application submitted by Mark Marsh, Digby Bridges,
Marsh and Associates, as agent for Harry & Deborah
Sargeant, owners of the property located at 1420 N.
Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, Florida which is legally
described as Lots 11, 11A and 12, McLouth Subdivision.
a. SUBDIVISION -To permit the separation of this parcel
into two parcels of 40,900 square feet and 52,111
square feet of effective lot area.
Town Manager Harrington advised that the existing property originally
was platted as two separate lots (Lots 11 and 12) but the lots were
automatically unified when the existing house was built across the
property line separating the lots. He explained that even though the
applicant wishes to revert to the original lot configurations, approval
of a subdivision is required.
Mr. Harrington went on to explain that both of the proposed lots are
crossed by a private road, which significantly reduces the Effective Lot
Area of each, with Lot 11 having a platted lot area of 60,198 square
feet, but an Effective Lot Area of only 52,111 square feet, and Lot 12,
a platted area of 51,382 square feet with only 40,900 square feet of
Effective Lot Area. Mr. Harrington advised that both lots have an
irregular shape, but on average, Lot 11 is about 200 feet wide and 300
feet deep, and Lot 12 averages about 225 feet wide and 225 feet deep.
He recommended approval of the subdivision as requested.
Mr. Lynch moved to recommend approval of a two -lot Subdivision as
requested, based on a finding that the plans and documents submitted by
the applicant meet all applicable Subdivision Review standards. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Devitt. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs.
Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE, and Chairman Wilson;
AYE.
b. LAND CLEARING PERMIT -To permit the removal and/or
relocation of existing significant vegetation and to
add fill.
Mr. Harrington advised that the applicant proposes to save and/or
relocate much of the existing significant vegetation throughout the
property. He stated that the landscape plans and overall site plans for
both Lots 11 and 12 have been designed together and a master landscape
plan for both is included in the agenda packet along with a more
specific plan for the subject lot.
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing - February 26, 1997
Page 4
The Town Manager stated that little, if any, fill will be needed as the
existing house is at the same floor elevation as the proposed home. He
noted the most significant grade changes are intended to enhance the
landscaping through the use of berms, and that included in the packet is
a civil engineering plan showing the existing ground elevations,
Cproposed berms and the locations of the proposed storm water retention
areas and septic system. Mr. Harrington recommended approval of a Land
Clearing Permit with the condition that all remaining or relocated
vegetation shall be adequately protected during construction.
Mr. Lynch made a motion to recommend approval of a Land Clearing Permit
based on a finding that the plans and documents submitted by the
applicant meet all applicable permitting standards with the condition
that all remaining or relocated vegetation shall be adequately protected
during construction. Mr. Devitt seconded the motion. Roll Call: Mr.
Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE, and
Chairman Wilson; AYE.
c. VARIANCE -To permit a zero foot setback in the
required 15 foot east side yard setback for the
construction of a dock.
Town Manager Harrington called attention to a letter that was received
after the agenda had been made public requesting that the Variance
request to permit a zero foot setback in the required 15 foot east side
yard setback for the construction of a dock be withdrawn. He went on to
explain that both applicants had requested to be permitted to construct
a dock the full length of the sea wall in order to screen the
appearance of the sea wall. He advised that he explained to the
applicant that there are no other docks in the area that cover an entire
sea wall and a dock of this size would be inappropriate. Mr. Harrington
stated that he recommends that the Board approve the withdrawal of the
application without prejudice.
Mr. Devitt moved and Mr. Lynch seconded that the applicant's request for
withdrawal of the variance request be granted without prejudice. Roll
Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston;
AYE, and Chairman Wilson; AYE.
Mr. Marsh arrived at this time and was administered the Oath by the Town
Clerk.
d. VARIANCE -To permit an existing non -conforming minor
accessory structure to remain in the absence of a
primary structure.
Mr. Marsh explained that the applicant had originally believed that the
existing shed, which encroaches 8 feet into the required 15 foot west
side yard, was of some value. They have since determined that it is
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing - February 26, 1997
Page 5
constructed of plywood and they do not feel it is worth saving, he said.
As a result, the applicant is requesting that their application for a
variance to retain the non -conforming shed be withdrawn.
Mr. Devitt moved and Mr. Lynch seconded that the request to withdraw the
application for a variance to retain the accessory structure without a
�\ primary structure in place on the property be granted without prejudice.
Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs.
Winston; AYE, and Chairman Wilson; AYE.
e. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW -To permit the
demolition of the existing home and the construct-
ion of a new 2 -story single family dwelling of 12,801
square feet.
Mr. Marsh began by displaying a site plan showing the proposed
development of both lots. He explained that they have been designed to
compliment each other while still protecting the privacy of each. He
further explained that the setbacks on both properties are an average of
20% greater than the Code requires, pointing out that both are set back
a considerable distance from the pavement of the private road. Mr.
Marsh went on to advise that the docks will extend the full width of the
lot, but will not encroach into the side setbacks. In regard to the
driveway, he stated it will be constructed of Chicago brick with the
only concrete being on the west side of the garage. He called attention
to the large expanse of lawn extending from the home to the basin.
Mr. Marsh then turned to the matter of the floor plan and elevations. He
advised that the design is a formal Venetian Mediterranean style with
the massing centralized. He pointed out that the roof eaves are in one
line with the roof pitch being 4/12. Mr. Marsh noted that the garage is
connected to the house with a breezeway. At this point Mr. Marsh
displayed a color rendering and distributed a sample of the proposed
exterior color, a very pale beige or off-white. He stated the roof
material is hand made clay tile to give a natural look to the roof. He
stated that he was aware this is in conflict with the majority of the
homes in this district but he felt that with the golf course on one side
and the wide basin on the other, and with both houses being placed in
the center of the property with very large setbacks, these homes would
not be out of place. He noted the softness of the color and pointed out
that all windows would be made of wood and all materials used in the
construction of both homes would be of the highest quality.
Town Manager Harrington asked Mr. Marsh if the second floor rafters
would be painted or stained and was advised that they would be painted
with a little darker shade than the walls of the house.
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing - February 26, 1997
Page 6
Chairman Wilson asked Mr. Harrington to review his staff report at this
point.
Town Manager Harrington reviewed his report which stated that the two
lots are being developed simultaneously in that the owners are brothers.
C The applicants, Mr. and Mrs. Harry Sargeant, propose to construct a two-
story home with six bedrooms and six full- and two half- baths. Other
structures on the property include an attached three -car garage and a
detached pool house with a half -bath. The total living area is 9,315
square feet and the gross floor area, including the living area, garage
and covered patios, is 12,998 square feet. Mr. Harrington explained
that the gross floor area also included the "bridge" connecting the
garage to the house as well as the double -counting of the floor area of
the living room and entrance foyer, which are open to the second floor.
He advised that the proposed gross floor area is within 34 square feet
of the maximum permitted under the Sliding Scale FAR. Mr. Harrington's
report listed the design elements of the home, described by the
architect as Venetian Mediterranean, as follows: a reddish clay barrel
tile roof; closed eaves on the one-story roof sections and open eaves
with cypress rafter tails on the second floor roof sections; textured
stucco walls; casement windows with muntins; pronounced window sills and
rounded transoms on some windows; covered porches with decorative cast
stone columns; French doors; balconies with pot-bellied, cast aluminum
handrails; and a cast stone front entry.
Mr. Harrington's report pointed out that the Venetian Mediterranean
style has similar design elements and features to the Spanish -
Mediterranean style but the form of the building itself differs
significantly in that Spanish -Mediterranean architecture is
characterized by asymmetrical, rambling building forms while the
Venetian Mediterranean style consists of highly symmetrical, simple
blocks, giving a formal appearance more typically associated with
Colonial -type architecture.
Town Manager Harrington's report advised the proposed home has a first
floor elevation of +8.5 feet NGVD. The first floor save lines are at
10' with the second finished floor level set at 13' above the first
floor, and the second floor eaves set at 2214". The roof heights for
one-story elements vary with the highest being about 18' over the
garage, and that the second floor roof reaches a peak of about 29' with
the chimneys extending to 351.
In closing, Mr. Harrington advised that other proposed improvements to
the site include a terraced patio and pool and deck area at the rear of
the property and a dock for most of the frontage along the cove. He
further advised that in the front, a driveway leads from the east end of
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing - February 26, 1997
Page 7
the property to a large, circular brick motor court located in front of
the main entrance, then passes under the "bridge", changes to concrete
and turns in front of the garages. It then changes back to brick and
leads back out to the street just west of the center of the property, he
said.
Mr. Harrington recommended approval of a Level 3 Architectural/Site Plan
Review based on a finding that the plans and documents submitted by the
applicant are minimally consistent with all applicable review criteria
with the following conditions: The walls of the house shall be of a
color and tone similar to those used on other structures within the
McLouth subdivision and the dock shall not exceed 80' in length.
Town Manager Harrington then asked Attorney Randolph to review the Town
Policy regarding ex parte communications regarding matters of a quasi-
judicial nature.
Attorney Randolph explained that board members are discouraged from
communicating on matters that are before them, or that will be coming
before them, outside of the public hearing. He stated that if there has
been some type of contact outside of the public hearing, or if there
have been any visits made to the sites under consideration, this must be
publicly disclosed. He reminded that final decisions should rely
exclusively on the evidence presented at the public hearing.
Mr. Devitt advised he had been contacted by the applicant but realized
this matter would be coming before the Board and advised the applicant
that he would be unable to discuss the matter with them. He further
advised that he did drive by the site, alone. Mr. Devitt stated that
his decision will be based on what is presented at the public hearing.
Chairman Wilson advised he had also been contacted by the applicant and
that he had advised them that he was unable to discuss the matter at any
time outside of the public hearing. He stated that he will decide the
matter based on what is presented at the public hearing.
Mrs. Souder stated that she had no communications regarding this matter
and had not visited the site. She advised that her decision would be
based on what is presented at the public hearing.
Mr. Lynch stated that he had had no communications, had not visited the
site, and would base his decision on what is presented at the public
hearing.
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing - February 26, 1997
Page 8
Mrs. Winston advised that she neither visited the site nor had any prior
communication, and would decide the matter based on material and
testimony presented at the public hearing.
Chairman Wilson asked for comment from the public at this point.
CCynthia Neeves, 1304 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, FL stated that the
homes that are proposed are beautiful but she did not feel they belonged
in the McLouth Subdivision. She pointed out that the McLouth
Subdivision is very unique with the white tile roofs and the homes all
having very large lawns in comparison to the size of the homes.
Donald McGraw, 1330 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, FL advised he has lived
in the McLouth Subdivision longer than any other resident and that the
area was established as Bermuda Colonial. He also commented that the
proposed homes are beautiful, but out of place in McLouth.
Deborah Sergeant, one of the applicants asked to be recognized. The
Town Clerk administered the Oath to Mrs. Sergeant. Mrs. Sergeant
advised that these are very close families and presently live in the
same neighborhood in Coral Springs. She stated that her brother-in-law,
Dan Sergeant, expects to be married in the near future. Mrs. Sergeant
said that they had given a great deal of thought in planning this home.
She considers this her "dream house" and this location as a perfect
place to live. Mrs. Sergeant stated that they had no intention of
devaluating the area and was surprised at the negative reaction the
project is receiving. She closed by advising that she is very excited
at the prospect of being able to build her "dream house" here and reside
in Gulf Stream.
Betsy Hvide, 1424 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, FL, stated that she had
lived in her Georgian "dream house" in Boca Raton. When they decided to
build a home in McLouth Subdivision, they recognized that this Georgian
style of home would not fit in this neighborhood, she said. She closed
by stating, "this is a Bermuda Subdivision".
Margaret Hupfel, 1428 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream FL, advised that she
has lived at this location for 33 years and has seen mostly Bermuda
style homes constructed. She pointed out that recently the Mayor and
Town Manager requested of the City of Delray Beach that a Bermuda style
multi -family development be constructed across the Intracoastal Waterway
rather than the Mediterranean that was proposed so the development would
be compatible with McLouth. Mrs. Hupfel stated the proposed home is
wrong on two scores; it does not look as if it belongs, and is out of
scale with the neighborhood. She did not believe that this house could
be scaled down with the heavy tile roof while the others have white,
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing - February 26, 1997
Page 9
flat tile which appears to be much lighter. Mrs. Hupfel maintained that
a home should be of a design that is timeless.
There being no others from the public requesting to be heard, Chairman
Wilson asked for comments from the Board.
Mrs. Winston stated she did not feel that the proposed structure would
fit in the neighborhood, mainly because of the massing.
Mr. Lynch advised that he had no problem with the size but does not feel
the style would fit into this District.
Mrs. Souder believed that neither the style nor size of the structure
would be appropriate in McLouth and would "stick out".
Mr. Devitt stated that this proposed home is well designed but he was
concerned with the compatibility.
Chairman Wilson stated sizing is not an issue but that compatibility of
design elements is the key.
All of the Board members commented that the proposed home is beautiful.
Mark Marsh was recognized and stated that Mrs. Hupfel's comments were
good. He remarked that every house his firm had done in Gulf Stream is
timeless, not contrived, and this is the important thing. He went on to
state that he wouldn't put a house in a neighborhood that didn't fit.
He pointed out that the design is classic and he felt the neighborhood
is diverse, in that there are only three of what he considers Bermuda
style homes left in the neighborhood. In closing, Mr. Marsh asked if
anyone had an objection to a two story design. All board members
indicated that they had no objection to a second story.
At the request of the applicant, Chairman Wilson declared a 5 minute
recess at 9:40 A.M. and then reconvened at 9:50 A.M., calling for a
motion regarding the Level 3 Architectural/Site Plan Review.
Mr. Lynch moved that it be recommended to the Town Commission that
approval of the Level 3 Architectural/Site Plan Review be denied in that
the design of the house is not compatible with the neighborhood, with
the provision that the applicant be permitted to return with a redesign,
if they choose to do so. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Souder. There
was no further comment or discussion. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs.
Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE, and Chairman Wilson;
AYE.
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing - February 26, 1997
Page 10
2. An application submitted by Mark Marsh, Digby Bridges,
Marsh and Associates, as agent for Dan Sargeant, owner of
the property located at 1414 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream,
Florida which is legally described as Lot 12, McLouth
Subdivision.
Mark Marsh of Digby Bridges, Marsh and Associates, presented a color
rendering of the proposed home and pointed out that it, like the other
home, is set well back off the road and that there is 60, between
structures to protect privacy. He further pointed out that the guest
cottage is linked to the pool cabana and they have exceed the required
minimums of open space and setbacks. He noted that a balance had been
achieved across the front and that a structure has been created that
will not be like the other house. While there is a formal entry, it is
not reflected on the exterior, he said. Mr. Marsh circulated a color
chart indicating that the color would be similar to the other house but
not identical. He explained that there is a solid roof linking the
accessory structures to the home which adds to the total square footage
of the project, resulting in having to request a Special Exception to
exceed the maximum square footage permitted by approximately 300 square
feet. He closed by pointing out that there are no contracting elements
and decoration.
Town Manager Harrington reviewed his report which noted that the
applicant proposes to construct a two-story home with four bedrooms and
four full- and two half -baths, along with and attached three -car garage,
a detached guest bedroom with a full -bath, and a pool house with a half -
bath. The total living area is 8,296 square feet and the gross floor
area, including the living area, garage and covered patios, is 11,1080
square feet. He pointed out that the gross floor area also includes the
double -counting of the floor area of the living room and entrance foyer,
which are open to the second floor.
Mr. Harrington stated the proposed gross floor area is 300 square feet
greater than the maximum permitted under the Sliding Scale FAR, and a
Special Exception is being requested to permit the additional floor
area. Because the applicant originally applied for a Variance for the
dock setback, a Variance for the additional floor area would have been
required. However, now that the Variance request has been withdrawn,
the additional floor area may be approved as a Special Exception. He
advised that if the Special Exception is not approved, the applicant
will remove the covered walkway that connects the house with the guest
bedroom and pool house, thereby reducing the gross floor area by 323
square feet. He added that the area of the covered walkway was not
included in the calculations shown on the site plan but the calculations
on the site plan do include the additional 832 square feet of covered
patio area included in the design of the home.
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing - February 26, 1997
Page 11
The Town Manager's report noted that the architectural style of the home
is described by the architect as Venetian Mediterranean and the design
elements include: a reddish clay barrel tile roof; closed eaves on the
one-story roof sections and open eaves with cypress rafter tails on the
second floor roof sections; textured stucco walls; casement windows
with muntins (some with rounded tops); pronounced window sills; and
covered porches with decorative columns. Other design features include:
French doors, some with rectangular transoms; balconies with cast stone
balustrades; and a small wall fountain to the left of the front entry.
Comparing the proposed home on Lot 11 with this Venetian Mediterranean,
Mr. Harrington noted that this home lacks strong symmetry and simple
block design, resulting in a design more closely resembling a Spanish -
Mediterranean design. The Spanish -Mediterranean style is further
reflected in the wall fountain, the relief framing on the upper windows
of the living room, and the tower appearance of the family room/master
bath on the rear, he said.
Mr. Harrington's report advised that the first floor elevation is +8.5
feet NGVD and that most of the first floor eave lines are at 1013" with
the front entry at 10'100. The second finished floor level is set at
13' above the first floor, with second floor eaves set at 2214". The
roof height for one-story elements vary with the highest being about 18'
over the garage, while the second floor roof reaches a peak of about
30', with the chimneys extending to 351. All roof areas have a 4/12
slope.
Other proposed improvements to the site were noted to include a terraced
patio, pool and deck area at the rear of the property, a 20' dock along
the cove, and a circular brick driveway that passes in front of the
house and leads back to the east side of the property to the garages.
In addition, a low wall surrounds the front entry, dividing it from the
driveway, he said.
In closing, Mr. Harrington stated that the applicant proposes to save
and/or relocate much of the existing significant vegetation throughout
the property and that a master landscape plan for both Lots 11 and 12 is
included with a more specific plan for this subject lot. Mr. Harrington
said that little, if any, fill will be needed as the existing house is
at the same floor elevation as the proposed home. He then recommended
approval of a Level 3 Architectural/Site Plan Review based on a finding
that the plans and documents submitted by the applicant are minim rally
consistent with all applicable review criteria with the following
conditions: Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the
applicant shall record a deed restriction that prohibits the future
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing - February 26, 1997
Page 12
enclosure of any portion of the 1,155 square feet of covered
patio/walkway area or the increasing of the gross floor area beyond
11,080 square feet, and the walls of the house shall be of a color and
tone similar to those used on other structures within the McLouth
subdivision, but shall not be identical to the home proposed for Lot 11.
a. LAND CLEARING PERMIT -To permit the removal and/or
relocation of significant vegetation and to add fill.
Mr. Lynch moved and Mrs. Winston seconded that it be recommended to the
Town Commission that a Land Clearing Permit be approved as requested
based on a finding that the plans and documents submitted by the
applicant meet all applicable permitting standards, with the condition
that all remaining or relocated vegetation shall be adequately protected
during construction. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr.
Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE and Chairman Wilson; AYE.
b. VARIANCE -To permit a zero foot setback in the required
15 foot west side yard setback for construction of a
dock.
Town Manager Harrington called attention to a letter requesting
withdrawal of this portion of the application, which was received from
the applicant after the Hearing had been advertised.
Mr. Devitt moved and Mr. Lynch seconded that it be recommended to the
Town Commission that the withdrawal of this request be approved without
prejudice. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch;
AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE, and Chairman Wilson; AYE.
c. VARIANCE -To exclude 300 aqua
ions from the maximum floor
Chairman Wilson directed that consideration of
until such time as consideration is given to t
Architectural/Site Plan Review.
re feet of roof project -
area calculation.
this request be deferred
he Level 3
d. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW -To permit con-
struction of a new 2 -story single family dwelling
consisting of 10,689 square feet.
There was no comment from the public regarding this matter and Chairman
Wilson asked for comment from the Board.
Mrs. Souder and Mrs. Winston expressed the same comments as they had
expressed when considering the proposed home for Lot 11.
Mr. Lynch stated the same comments as he had for the proposed house for
Lot 11 and emphasized that it is the architecture that he feels is
inappropriate for the neighborhood, not the size.
Mr. Devitt and Chairman Wilson voiced the same comments that they had
for the proposed home for Lot 11, previously discussed.
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing - February 26, 1997 Page 13
Mr. Lynch moved that it be recommended to the Town Commission that
approval of the Level 3 Architectural/Site Plan Review be denied in that
the design is inconsistent with the architecture in the neighborhood in
regard to character, design, architectural style and form, and mass and
scale, but that the applicant may be permitted to return with a redesign
C should he desire to do so. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Winston.
There was no comment from the public or the board members. Roll Call:
Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE,
and Chairman Wilson; AYE.
Chairman Wilson directed that the matter of the requested Special
Exception now be considered.
Mr. Devitt moved to recommend that the Special Exception to exclude 300
square feet of roof projection from the maximum floor area calculation
be disapproved based on the denial of the Level 3 Architectural/Site
Plan Review. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lynch. There was no
comment from the public or the board members. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt;
AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE, and Chairman
Wilson; AYE.
Due to the lateness of the hour, Chairman Wilson asked for a motion to
defer Items VII., VIII, and IX., as listed hereafter, until the next
meeting. It was so moved by Mr. Lynch and seconded by Mrs. Winston
with all voting in the affirmative.
VII. Design Manual Evaluation: 1996-1997
A. Coastal Construction Control Line Relocation
B. Zoning District Character Descriptions
VIII. Items by Staff.
A. Construction in Progress for January, 1997
r4 7 -1q
X.
Roger Saberson, an attorney representing Mrs. Talbot Speer,
advised that his client is interested in subdividing her property on the
ocean front into two lots but has discovered that as a result of changes
that were made in the zoning code when the Design Manual was adopted,
there is not enough square footage to do so. He reminded that 100' of
the property had been split -off several years previously and at that
time the additional subdivision could have been made. Mr. Saberson
stated that he was interested in getting the feeling of the Board about
granting relief for the Speers. He further stated that since there was
to be an evaluation of the Manual with regard to the effect of the
Architectural Review & Planning Board
Public Hearing - February 26, 1997
Page 14
relocation of the CCCL, he was interested, as it could have an impact on
the decision of the Board regarding relief for the Speers.
Chairman Wilson advised Mr. Saberson that this will be considered at
the next meeting.
Ci
XI. AdI ournment .
Mr. Lynch moved to adjourn and the motion was seconded by Mrs.
Winston with all voting in the affirmative to do so. Chairman Wilson
adjourned the meeting at 10:25 A.M.
;� � r (C'
Rita L. Taylor ,Ilown Clerk