Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout02/26/1997REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM, FLORIDA ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1997, AT 8:30 A.M., IN THE TOWN HALL, 100 SEA ROAD, GULF STREAM, FLORIDA. I. Call to order. Chairman Wilson called the meeting to order at 8:30 A.M. II. Roll Call. Present and Participating Also Present and Participating Howard E.N. Wilson William Lynch Fred Devitt III Susanna Souder Sara Winston E. Scott Harrington John Randolph Rita Taylor Mark Marsh Cynthia Neeves Betsy Hvide Margaret Hupfel Donald McGraw Deborah Sargeant Roger Saberson Chairman Vice Chairman Board Member Board Member Board Member Town Manager Town Attorney Town Clerk Agent for Sergeant Resident Resident Resident Resident Applicant Attorney III. Minutes of the Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of 1-22-97. Mr. Lynch moved and Mr. Devitt seconded that the minutes be approved as circulated and all voted AYE at roll call. IV. Additions, withdrawals. deferrals. arrangement of agenda items. There were no changes in the agenda requested. V. Announcements. A. Meeting Dates 1. March 26, 19 2. April 23, 19 3. May 28, 1997 4. June 25, 1997 5. July 23, 1997 Chairman Wilson made these 97 at 8:30 A.M. 97 at 8:30 A.M. at 8:30 A.M. at 8:30 A.M. at 8:30 A.M. announcements. VI. PUBLIC HEARING. A. Applications for Development Approval Chairman Wilson asked for those persons who wanted to speak in regard to any of the matters that will be considered at the Public Hearing to Architectural Review & Planning Board Public Hearing - February 26, 1997 Page 2 please stand and be sworn. The Town Clerk administered the Oath to the following: Cynthia Neeves, Betsy Hvide, Margaret Hupfel, Donald McGraw, Perry O'Neal and Roger Saberson. Inasmuch as the Agent for the first two applications had not yet arrived, Chairman Wilson directed that Items 3 and 4 be considered at C' this time. 3. An application submitted by H. Frank Lahage and Assoc- iates, Inc., as agent for Mr. & Mrs. David Grissom, owners of the property located at 1535 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, Florida, legally described in metes and bounds in Section 10, Township 46 South, Range 43 East. Town Manager Harrington stated he was not sure that anyone would be appearing to present this application but that he would do so at this time. a. SIGN REVIEW -To permit the erection of a contractors sign on the property described herein. Mr. Harrington stated that the applicant is requesting to place a contractors sign, not to exceed 6 square feet, that would be set eastward of the west property line approximately 501. He further stated that the sign would be white with black letters. Mr. Harrington closed by advising that he is recommending approval of the sign permit as the request is consistent with all applicable review standards. Mr. Lynch moved and Mrs. Winston seconded that the contractor's sign and location be approved based on a finding that the plans and documents submitted by the applicant meet all applicable Sign Review criteria. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE, and Chairman Wilson; AYE,. 4. An application submitted by H. Frank Lahage and Assoc- iates, Inc., as agent for Mr. & Mrs. Paul Malnove, owners of the property located at 1555 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, Florida, legally described in metes and bounds in Section 10, Township 46 South, Range 43 East. a. SIGN REVIEW -To permit erection of a contractors sign on the property described herein. Town Manager Harrington advised that this request is identical to the one for the property owned by Mr. & Mrs. Grissom. He repeated that the proposed sign would be white with black letters, would not exceed 6 square feet and would be located a minimum of 50' from the front property line. He recommended that approval be granted in that the applicant has met all applicable Sign Review criteria. Mr. Lynch moved and Mrs. Winston seconded that approval be granted as requested based on a finding that the plans and documents submitted by the applicant meet all applicable Sign Review criteria. Roll Call: Mr. Architectural Review & Planning Board Public Hearing - February 26, 1997 Page 3 Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE, and Chairman Wilson; AYE. Chairman Wilson directed that Applications 1. and 2. be considered at this time with Mr. Harrington handling the presentation until such time as Mr. Marsh arrives. C1. An application submitted by Mark Marsh, Digby Bridges, Marsh and Associates, as agent for Harry & Deborah Sargeant, owners of the property located at 1420 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, Florida which is legally described as Lots 11, 11A and 12, McLouth Subdivision. a. SUBDIVISION -To permit the separation of this parcel into two parcels of 40,900 square feet and 52,111 square feet of effective lot area. Town Manager Harrington advised that the existing property originally was platted as two separate lots (Lots 11 and 12) but the lots were automatically unified when the existing house was built across the property line separating the lots. He explained that even though the applicant wishes to revert to the original lot configurations, approval of a subdivision is required. Mr. Harrington went on to explain that both of the proposed lots are crossed by a private road, which significantly reduces the Effective Lot Area of each, with Lot 11 having a platted lot area of 60,198 square feet, but an Effective Lot Area of only 52,111 square feet, and Lot 12, a platted area of 51,382 square feet with only 40,900 square feet of Effective Lot Area. Mr. Harrington advised that both lots have an irregular shape, but on average, Lot 11 is about 200 feet wide and 300 feet deep, and Lot 12 averages about 225 feet wide and 225 feet deep. He recommended approval of the subdivision as requested. Mr. Lynch moved to recommend approval of a two -lot Subdivision as requested, based on a finding that the plans and documents submitted by the applicant meet all applicable Subdivision Review standards. The motion was seconded by Mr. Devitt. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE, and Chairman Wilson; AYE. b. LAND CLEARING PERMIT -To permit the removal and/or relocation of existing significant vegetation and to add fill. Mr. Harrington advised that the applicant proposes to save and/or relocate much of the existing significant vegetation throughout the property. He stated that the landscape plans and overall site plans for both Lots 11 and 12 have been designed together and a master landscape plan for both is included in the agenda packet along with a more specific plan for the subject lot. Architectural Review & Planning Board Public Hearing - February 26, 1997 Page 4 The Town Manager stated that little, if any, fill will be needed as the existing house is at the same floor elevation as the proposed home. He noted the most significant grade changes are intended to enhance the landscaping through the use of berms, and that included in the packet is a civil engineering plan showing the existing ground elevations, Cproposed berms and the locations of the proposed storm water retention areas and septic system. Mr. Harrington recommended approval of a Land Clearing Permit with the condition that all remaining or relocated vegetation shall be adequately protected during construction. Mr. Lynch made a motion to recommend approval of a Land Clearing Permit based on a finding that the plans and documents submitted by the applicant meet all applicable permitting standards with the condition that all remaining or relocated vegetation shall be adequately protected during construction. Mr. Devitt seconded the motion. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE, and Chairman Wilson; AYE. c. VARIANCE -To permit a zero foot setback in the required 15 foot east side yard setback for the construction of a dock. Town Manager Harrington called attention to a letter that was received after the agenda had been made public requesting that the Variance request to permit a zero foot setback in the required 15 foot east side yard setback for the construction of a dock be withdrawn. He went on to explain that both applicants had requested to be permitted to construct a dock the full length of the sea wall in order to screen the appearance of the sea wall. He advised that he explained to the applicant that there are no other docks in the area that cover an entire sea wall and a dock of this size would be inappropriate. Mr. Harrington stated that he recommends that the Board approve the withdrawal of the application without prejudice. Mr. Devitt moved and Mr. Lynch seconded that the applicant's request for withdrawal of the variance request be granted without prejudice. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE, and Chairman Wilson; AYE. Mr. Marsh arrived at this time and was administered the Oath by the Town Clerk. d. VARIANCE -To permit an existing non -conforming minor accessory structure to remain in the absence of a primary structure. Mr. Marsh explained that the applicant had originally believed that the existing shed, which encroaches 8 feet into the required 15 foot west side yard, was of some value. They have since determined that it is Architectural Review & Planning Board Public Hearing - February 26, 1997 Page 5 constructed of plywood and they do not feel it is worth saving, he said. As a result, the applicant is requesting that their application for a variance to retain the non -conforming shed be withdrawn. Mr. Devitt moved and Mr. Lynch seconded that the request to withdraw the application for a variance to retain the accessory structure without a �\ primary structure in place on the property be granted without prejudice. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE, and Chairman Wilson; AYE. e. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW -To permit the demolition of the existing home and the construct- ion of a new 2 -story single family dwelling of 12,801 square feet. Mr. Marsh began by displaying a site plan showing the proposed development of both lots. He explained that they have been designed to compliment each other while still protecting the privacy of each. He further explained that the setbacks on both properties are an average of 20% greater than the Code requires, pointing out that both are set back a considerable distance from the pavement of the private road. Mr. Marsh went on to advise that the docks will extend the full width of the lot, but will not encroach into the side setbacks. In regard to the driveway, he stated it will be constructed of Chicago brick with the only concrete being on the west side of the garage. He called attention to the large expanse of lawn extending from the home to the basin. Mr. Marsh then turned to the matter of the floor plan and elevations. He advised that the design is a formal Venetian Mediterranean style with the massing centralized. He pointed out that the roof eaves are in one line with the roof pitch being 4/12. Mr. Marsh noted that the garage is connected to the house with a breezeway. At this point Mr. Marsh displayed a color rendering and distributed a sample of the proposed exterior color, a very pale beige or off-white. He stated the roof material is hand made clay tile to give a natural look to the roof. He stated that he was aware this is in conflict with the majority of the homes in this district but he felt that with the golf course on one side and the wide basin on the other, and with both houses being placed in the center of the property with very large setbacks, these homes would not be out of place. He noted the softness of the color and pointed out that all windows would be made of wood and all materials used in the construction of both homes would be of the highest quality. Town Manager Harrington asked Mr. Marsh if the second floor rafters would be painted or stained and was advised that they would be painted with a little darker shade than the walls of the house. Architectural Review & Planning Board Public Hearing - February 26, 1997 Page 6 Chairman Wilson asked Mr. Harrington to review his staff report at this point. Town Manager Harrington reviewed his report which stated that the two lots are being developed simultaneously in that the owners are brothers. C The applicants, Mr. and Mrs. Harry Sargeant, propose to construct a two- story home with six bedrooms and six full- and two half- baths. Other structures on the property include an attached three -car garage and a detached pool house with a half -bath. The total living area is 9,315 square feet and the gross floor area, including the living area, garage and covered patios, is 12,998 square feet. Mr. Harrington explained that the gross floor area also included the "bridge" connecting the garage to the house as well as the double -counting of the floor area of the living room and entrance foyer, which are open to the second floor. He advised that the proposed gross floor area is within 34 square feet of the maximum permitted under the Sliding Scale FAR. Mr. Harrington's report listed the design elements of the home, described by the architect as Venetian Mediterranean, as follows: a reddish clay barrel tile roof; closed eaves on the one-story roof sections and open eaves with cypress rafter tails on the second floor roof sections; textured stucco walls; casement windows with muntins; pronounced window sills and rounded transoms on some windows; covered porches with decorative cast stone columns; French doors; balconies with pot-bellied, cast aluminum handrails; and a cast stone front entry. Mr. Harrington's report pointed out that the Venetian Mediterranean style has similar design elements and features to the Spanish - Mediterranean style but the form of the building itself differs significantly in that Spanish -Mediterranean architecture is characterized by asymmetrical, rambling building forms while the Venetian Mediterranean style consists of highly symmetrical, simple blocks, giving a formal appearance more typically associated with Colonial -type architecture. Town Manager Harrington's report advised the proposed home has a first floor elevation of +8.5 feet NGVD. The first floor save lines are at 10' with the second finished floor level set at 13' above the first floor, and the second floor eaves set at 2214". The roof heights for one-story elements vary with the highest being about 18' over the garage, and that the second floor roof reaches a peak of about 29' with the chimneys extending to 351. In closing, Mr. Harrington advised that other proposed improvements to the site include a terraced patio and pool and deck area at the rear of the property and a dock for most of the frontage along the cove. He further advised that in the front, a driveway leads from the east end of Architectural Review & Planning Board Public Hearing - February 26, 1997 Page 7 the property to a large, circular brick motor court located in front of the main entrance, then passes under the "bridge", changes to concrete and turns in front of the garages. It then changes back to brick and leads back out to the street just west of the center of the property, he said. Mr. Harrington recommended approval of a Level 3 Architectural/Site Plan Review based on a finding that the plans and documents submitted by the applicant are minimally consistent with all applicable review criteria with the following conditions: The walls of the house shall be of a color and tone similar to those used on other structures within the McLouth subdivision and the dock shall not exceed 80' in length. Town Manager Harrington then asked Attorney Randolph to review the Town Policy regarding ex parte communications regarding matters of a quasi- judicial nature. Attorney Randolph explained that board members are discouraged from communicating on matters that are before them, or that will be coming before them, outside of the public hearing. He stated that if there has been some type of contact outside of the public hearing, or if there have been any visits made to the sites under consideration, this must be publicly disclosed. He reminded that final decisions should rely exclusively on the evidence presented at the public hearing. Mr. Devitt advised he had been contacted by the applicant but realized this matter would be coming before the Board and advised the applicant that he would be unable to discuss the matter with them. He further advised that he did drive by the site, alone. Mr. Devitt stated that his decision will be based on what is presented at the public hearing. Chairman Wilson advised he had also been contacted by the applicant and that he had advised them that he was unable to discuss the matter at any time outside of the public hearing. He stated that he will decide the matter based on what is presented at the public hearing. Mrs. Souder stated that she had no communications regarding this matter and had not visited the site. She advised that her decision would be based on what is presented at the public hearing. Mr. Lynch stated that he had had no communications, had not visited the site, and would base his decision on what is presented at the public hearing. Architectural Review & Planning Board Public Hearing - February 26, 1997 Page 8 Mrs. Winston advised that she neither visited the site nor had any prior communication, and would decide the matter based on material and testimony presented at the public hearing. Chairman Wilson asked for comment from the public at this point. CCynthia Neeves, 1304 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, FL stated that the homes that are proposed are beautiful but she did not feel they belonged in the McLouth Subdivision. She pointed out that the McLouth Subdivision is very unique with the white tile roofs and the homes all having very large lawns in comparison to the size of the homes. Donald McGraw, 1330 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, FL advised he has lived in the McLouth Subdivision longer than any other resident and that the area was established as Bermuda Colonial. He also commented that the proposed homes are beautiful, but out of place in McLouth. Deborah Sergeant, one of the applicants asked to be recognized. The Town Clerk administered the Oath to Mrs. Sergeant. Mrs. Sergeant advised that these are very close families and presently live in the same neighborhood in Coral Springs. She stated that her brother-in-law, Dan Sergeant, expects to be married in the near future. Mrs. Sergeant said that they had given a great deal of thought in planning this home. She considers this her "dream house" and this location as a perfect place to live. Mrs. Sergeant stated that they had no intention of devaluating the area and was surprised at the negative reaction the project is receiving. She closed by advising that she is very excited at the prospect of being able to build her "dream house" here and reside in Gulf Stream. Betsy Hvide, 1424 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, FL, stated that she had lived in her Georgian "dream house" in Boca Raton. When they decided to build a home in McLouth Subdivision, they recognized that this Georgian style of home would not fit in this neighborhood, she said. She closed by stating, "this is a Bermuda Subdivision". Margaret Hupfel, 1428 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream FL, advised that she has lived at this location for 33 years and has seen mostly Bermuda style homes constructed. She pointed out that recently the Mayor and Town Manager requested of the City of Delray Beach that a Bermuda style multi -family development be constructed across the Intracoastal Waterway rather than the Mediterranean that was proposed so the development would be compatible with McLouth. Mrs. Hupfel stated the proposed home is wrong on two scores; it does not look as if it belongs, and is out of scale with the neighborhood. She did not believe that this house could be scaled down with the heavy tile roof while the others have white, Architectural Review & Planning Board Public Hearing - February 26, 1997 Page 9 flat tile which appears to be much lighter. Mrs. Hupfel maintained that a home should be of a design that is timeless. There being no others from the public requesting to be heard, Chairman Wilson asked for comments from the Board. Mrs. Winston stated she did not feel that the proposed structure would fit in the neighborhood, mainly because of the massing. Mr. Lynch advised that he had no problem with the size but does not feel the style would fit into this District. Mrs. Souder believed that neither the style nor size of the structure would be appropriate in McLouth and would "stick out". Mr. Devitt stated that this proposed home is well designed but he was concerned with the compatibility. Chairman Wilson stated sizing is not an issue but that compatibility of design elements is the key. All of the Board members commented that the proposed home is beautiful. Mark Marsh was recognized and stated that Mrs. Hupfel's comments were good. He remarked that every house his firm had done in Gulf Stream is timeless, not contrived, and this is the important thing. He went on to state that he wouldn't put a house in a neighborhood that didn't fit. He pointed out that the design is classic and he felt the neighborhood is diverse, in that there are only three of what he considers Bermuda style homes left in the neighborhood. In closing, Mr. Marsh asked if anyone had an objection to a two story design. All board members indicated that they had no objection to a second story. At the request of the applicant, Chairman Wilson declared a 5 minute recess at 9:40 A.M. and then reconvened at 9:50 A.M., calling for a motion regarding the Level 3 Architectural/Site Plan Review. Mr. Lynch moved that it be recommended to the Town Commission that approval of the Level 3 Architectural/Site Plan Review be denied in that the design of the house is not compatible with the neighborhood, with the provision that the applicant be permitted to return with a redesign, if they choose to do so. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Souder. There was no further comment or discussion. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE, and Chairman Wilson; AYE. Architectural Review & Planning Board Public Hearing - February 26, 1997 Page 10 2. An application submitted by Mark Marsh, Digby Bridges, Marsh and Associates, as agent for Dan Sargeant, owner of the property located at 1414 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, Florida which is legally described as Lot 12, McLouth Subdivision. Mark Marsh of Digby Bridges, Marsh and Associates, presented a color rendering of the proposed home and pointed out that it, like the other home, is set well back off the road and that there is 60, between structures to protect privacy. He further pointed out that the guest cottage is linked to the pool cabana and they have exceed the required minimums of open space and setbacks. He noted that a balance had been achieved across the front and that a structure has been created that will not be like the other house. While there is a formal entry, it is not reflected on the exterior, he said. Mr. Marsh circulated a color chart indicating that the color would be similar to the other house but not identical. He explained that there is a solid roof linking the accessory structures to the home which adds to the total square footage of the project, resulting in having to request a Special Exception to exceed the maximum square footage permitted by approximately 300 square feet. He closed by pointing out that there are no contracting elements and decoration. Town Manager Harrington reviewed his report which noted that the applicant proposes to construct a two-story home with four bedrooms and four full- and two half -baths, along with and attached three -car garage, a detached guest bedroom with a full -bath, and a pool house with a half - bath. The total living area is 8,296 square feet and the gross floor area, including the living area, garage and covered patios, is 11,1080 square feet. He pointed out that the gross floor area also includes the double -counting of the floor area of the living room and entrance foyer, which are open to the second floor. Mr. Harrington stated the proposed gross floor area is 300 square feet greater than the maximum permitted under the Sliding Scale FAR, and a Special Exception is being requested to permit the additional floor area. Because the applicant originally applied for a Variance for the dock setback, a Variance for the additional floor area would have been required. However, now that the Variance request has been withdrawn, the additional floor area may be approved as a Special Exception. He advised that if the Special Exception is not approved, the applicant will remove the covered walkway that connects the house with the guest bedroom and pool house, thereby reducing the gross floor area by 323 square feet. He added that the area of the covered walkway was not included in the calculations shown on the site plan but the calculations on the site plan do include the additional 832 square feet of covered patio area included in the design of the home. Architectural Review & Planning Board Public Hearing - February 26, 1997 Page 11 The Town Manager's report noted that the architectural style of the home is described by the architect as Venetian Mediterranean and the design elements include: a reddish clay barrel tile roof; closed eaves on the one-story roof sections and open eaves with cypress rafter tails on the second floor roof sections; textured stucco walls; casement windows with muntins (some with rounded tops); pronounced window sills; and covered porches with decorative columns. Other design features include: French doors, some with rectangular transoms; balconies with cast stone balustrades; and a small wall fountain to the left of the front entry. Comparing the proposed home on Lot 11 with this Venetian Mediterranean, Mr. Harrington noted that this home lacks strong symmetry and simple block design, resulting in a design more closely resembling a Spanish - Mediterranean design. The Spanish -Mediterranean style is further reflected in the wall fountain, the relief framing on the upper windows of the living room, and the tower appearance of the family room/master bath on the rear, he said. Mr. Harrington's report advised that the first floor elevation is +8.5 feet NGVD and that most of the first floor eave lines are at 1013" with the front entry at 10'100. The second finished floor level is set at 13' above the first floor, with second floor eaves set at 2214". The roof height for one-story elements vary with the highest being about 18' over the garage, while the second floor roof reaches a peak of about 30', with the chimneys extending to 351. All roof areas have a 4/12 slope. Other proposed improvements to the site were noted to include a terraced patio, pool and deck area at the rear of the property, a 20' dock along the cove, and a circular brick driveway that passes in front of the house and leads back to the east side of the property to the garages. In addition, a low wall surrounds the front entry, dividing it from the driveway, he said. In closing, Mr. Harrington stated that the applicant proposes to save and/or relocate much of the existing significant vegetation throughout the property and that a master landscape plan for both Lots 11 and 12 is included with a more specific plan for this subject lot. Mr. Harrington said that little, if any, fill will be needed as the existing house is at the same floor elevation as the proposed home. He then recommended approval of a Level 3 Architectural/Site Plan Review based on a finding that the plans and documents submitted by the applicant are minim rally consistent with all applicable review criteria with the following conditions: Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall record a deed restriction that prohibits the future Architectural Review & Planning Board Public Hearing - February 26, 1997 Page 12 enclosure of any portion of the 1,155 square feet of covered patio/walkway area or the increasing of the gross floor area beyond 11,080 square feet, and the walls of the house shall be of a color and tone similar to those used on other structures within the McLouth subdivision, but shall not be identical to the home proposed for Lot 11. a. LAND CLEARING PERMIT -To permit the removal and/or relocation of significant vegetation and to add fill. Mr. Lynch moved and Mrs. Winston seconded that it be recommended to the Town Commission that a Land Clearing Permit be approved as requested based on a finding that the plans and documents submitted by the applicant meet all applicable permitting standards, with the condition that all remaining or relocated vegetation shall be adequately protected during construction. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE and Chairman Wilson; AYE. b. VARIANCE -To permit a zero foot setback in the required 15 foot west side yard setback for construction of a dock. Town Manager Harrington called attention to a letter requesting withdrawal of this portion of the application, which was received from the applicant after the Hearing had been advertised. Mr. Devitt moved and Mr. Lynch seconded that it be recommended to the Town Commission that the withdrawal of this request be approved without prejudice. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE, and Chairman Wilson; AYE. c. VARIANCE -To exclude 300 aqua ions from the maximum floor Chairman Wilson directed that consideration of until such time as consideration is given to t Architectural/Site Plan Review. re feet of roof project - area calculation. this request be deferred he Level 3 d. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW -To permit con- struction of a new 2 -story single family dwelling consisting of 10,689 square feet. There was no comment from the public regarding this matter and Chairman Wilson asked for comment from the Board. Mrs. Souder and Mrs. Winston expressed the same comments as they had expressed when considering the proposed home for Lot 11. Mr. Lynch stated the same comments as he had for the proposed house for Lot 11 and emphasized that it is the architecture that he feels is inappropriate for the neighborhood, not the size. Mr. Devitt and Chairman Wilson voiced the same comments that they had for the proposed home for Lot 11, previously discussed. Architectural Review & Planning Board Public Hearing - February 26, 1997 Page 13 Mr. Lynch moved that it be recommended to the Town Commission that approval of the Level 3 Architectural/Site Plan Review be denied in that the design is inconsistent with the architecture in the neighborhood in regard to character, design, architectural style and form, and mass and scale, but that the applicant may be permitted to return with a redesign C should he desire to do so. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Winston. There was no comment from the public or the board members. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE, and Chairman Wilson; AYE. Chairman Wilson directed that the matter of the requested Special Exception now be considered. Mr. Devitt moved to recommend that the Special Exception to exclude 300 square feet of roof projection from the maximum floor area calculation be disapproved based on the denial of the Level 3 Architectural/Site Plan Review. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lynch. There was no comment from the public or the board members. Roll Call: Mr. Devitt; AYE, Mrs. Souder; AYE, Mr. Lynch; AYE, Mrs. Winston; AYE, and Chairman Wilson; AYE. Due to the lateness of the hour, Chairman Wilson asked for a motion to defer Items VII., VIII, and IX., as listed hereafter, until the next meeting. It was so moved by Mr. Lynch and seconded by Mrs. Winston with all voting in the affirmative. VII. Design Manual Evaluation: 1996-1997 A. Coastal Construction Control Line Relocation B. Zoning District Character Descriptions VIII. Items by Staff. A. Construction in Progress for January, 1997 r4 7 -1q X. Roger Saberson, an attorney representing Mrs. Talbot Speer, advised that his client is interested in subdividing her property on the ocean front into two lots but has discovered that as a result of changes that were made in the zoning code when the Design Manual was adopted, there is not enough square footage to do so. He reminded that 100' of the property had been split -off several years previously and at that time the additional subdivision could have been made. Mr. Saberson stated that he was interested in getting the feeling of the Board about granting relief for the Speers. He further stated that since there was to be an evaluation of the Manual with regard to the effect of the Architectural Review & Planning Board Public Hearing - February 26, 1997 Page 14 relocation of the CCCL, he was interested, as it could have an impact on the decision of the Board regarding relief for the Speers. Chairman Wilson advised Mr. Saberson that this will be considered at the next meeting. Ci XI. AdI ournment . Mr. Lynch moved to adjourn and the motion was seconded by Mrs. Winston with all voting in the affirmative to do so. Chairman Wilson adjourned the meeting at 10:25 A.M. ;� � r (C' Rita L. Taylor ,Ilown Clerk