HomeMy Public PortalAbout1991-77Member 44/ rae fi
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 9/ 77
RESOLUTION GRANTING DEVELOPMENT
PLAN AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL
TO LAUREL J. AWES
WHEREAS, Laurel J. Awes (Applicant) has requested development plan and site
plan approval for a commercial riding stable on certain property located in Hennepin
County, Minnesota (Property), which Property is legally described as follows:
That part of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of
Section 5, Township 118, Range 23, which lies northeasterly of the
centerline of Pioneer Trail (Old County Road 9); subject to the
rights -of -way of Pioneer Trail and Minnesota Trunk Highway 55;
Hennepin County, Minnesota;
and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has also requested a subdivision of such Property from
the land lying southwesterly of Pioneer Trail (Other Land), which is legally described as
follows:
That part of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of
Section 5, Township 118, Range 23, lying southerly of Pioneer Trail
north of the east 119 feet thereof and easterly of a line running
northerly from a point in the south line of said northeast quarter of
the northwest quarter at an angle of 105 degrees 33 minutes 32
seconds with said south line said point being 944 feet west from the
southeast corner of said northeast quarter of the northwest
quarter;
and
WHEREAS, the planning commission and city council have reviewed the Applicant's
request for conformance with the provisions of Sections 827.27 et seq. (PUD Ordinance)
and Sections 820.01 et seq. (Subdivision Ordinance) of the Medina Code of Ordinances.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Medina
that the City makes the following findings with regard to the Applicant's request:
1. The development plan and site plan are compatible with the standards, purposes
and intent of the PUD ordinance;
2. The development plan and site plan are consistent with the goals and policies of the
City's comprehensive plan;
3. Approval of the development plan and site plan will not have a detrimental affect
on adjacent property but PUD zoning and a PUD Agreement are necessary because:
(a) The Property is to be subdivided from the Other Land, thus effectuating a
division from a 1986 lot consolidation;
(b) The dwelling unit on the Property is an apartment in the barn and not a free
standing single family house as is required in the RR-2 zone, while the single
family house is and will remain on the Other Land;
(c) The hard surface coverage of the Property is 47 percent versus the 40
percent allowed in the RR-2 zone;
(d) The Applicant wishes to keep 28 horses on the Property, but the RR-2 zone
only permits 20 horses; and
(e) The Property does not have and will not have sewer service in the
foreseeable future; the anticipated sewage treatment area, even with
alternate site, is marginal; and but for the special provisions of the PUD
Agreement, the Property may not be able to sustain the level of useage to
which Applicant wishes to put it; and
4. The development plan and site plan provide for adequate internal site organization,
uses, densities, circulation, parking, open space, buffering and landscaping and
therefore, ameliorate the shortcomings of the RR-2 zoning ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Medina as follows:
5. The Applicant's development plan and site plan attached hereto as Exhibit A are
approved;
6. The Property is rezoned PUD RR-2 upon adoption of an ordinance in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit B;
7. Approval of the development plan and site plan and rezoning of the Property to
PUD RR-2 are conditioned upon execution of a PUD Agreement in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit C; and
8. Approval of the development plan and site plan and rezoning of the Property to
PUD RR-2 are conditioned upon execution of a Petition and Waiver Agreement in
the form attached hereto as Exhibit D and execution of certain easements in the
forms attached hereto as Exhibits E1, E2 and E3.
2
DATED: !-' - ' , 1991.
ATTEST:
Donna Roehl, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
r m : ijir/%// %ii �s f .2 le ! 7� sv
and the following voted against same:
o e
z'G
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
ME230:092
3