HomeMy Public PortalAbout12/22/2011MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM,
FLORIDA ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 22, 2011 AT 8:30 A.M., IN THE TOWN HALL,
100 SEA ROAD, GULF STREAM, FLORIDA.
I. Call to order. Chairman Ganger called the Meeting to order at
8:30 A.M.
II. Roll Call.
Present and
Participating
Absent w/Notice
Also Present and
Participating
Robert W. Ganger
Scott Morgan
Thomas Smith .
Malcolm Murphy
Thomas M. Stanley
Amanda Jones
Paul Lyons, Jr.
William H. Thrasher
Rita L. Taylor
John Randolph
Hassan Tajalli of Ames
Architectural Design
William Allis
Tom Laudani of Seaside
Builders
Marty Minor of Urban
Design Kilday Studios
Chairman
Vice -Chairman
Board Member
Board Member
Alternate Member
Alternate Member
Board Member
Town Manager
Town Clerk
Town Attorney
Agent for McCrady
3883 Bermuda Lane #6
Agent for Arscott &
Harbor View Estates
Town Consultant
III. Minutes of the Reqular Meeting and Public Hearing of 11-17-11.
Mr. Smith moved and Vice -Chairman Morgan seconded to approve the Minutes
of the Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of November 17, 2011. There
was no discussion. Roll Call: Mr. Stanley, AYE; Vice -Chairman Morgan,
AYE; Mr. Smith, AYE; Mr. Murphy, AYE; Chairman Ganger, AYE. The motion
passed 5 - 0.
IV. Additions, withdrawals, deferrals, arrangement of aqenda items.
There were no changes to the Agenda.
V. Announcements.
A. Meeting Dates
1. Regular Meeting & Public Hearing
a. January 26, 2012 @ 8:30 A.M.
b. February 23, 2012 @ 8:30 A.M.
c. March 22, 2012 @ 8:30 A.M.
d. April 26, 2012 @ 8:30 A.M.
e. May 24, 2012 @ 8:30 A.M.
f. June 28, 2012 @ 8:30 A.M.
There were no conflicts with meeting schedule. Chairman Ganger asked
Clerk Taylor if any applications have been submitted for the January 26th
Public Hearing. Clerk Taylor said there were no applications at this
time.
Chairman Ganger announced that he would request declarations of ex -parte
communication prior to each matter for public hearing. He asked if
Regular Meeting and Public Hearing - December 22, 2011
Architectural Review and Planning Board Page 2
there has been ex -parte communication concerning the application by
Hassan Tajalli for Mr. and Mrs. McCrady. Chairman Ganger stated that he
only drove by the property. There were no additional declarations of
ex -parte communication.
Clerk Taylor administered the Oath to Hassan Tajalli, William Allis, Tom
Laudani and Marty Minor.
klrj�ii)*0on I A ;i*kir}
A. Applications for Development Approval
1. An application submitted by Caroline Rudolf or Hassan
Tajalli as agent for Mr.& Mrs. William McCrady, owners of
the property located at 3883 Bermuda Lane, Apt. 8, Gulf
Stream, Florida, which is legally described as Bermuda
Club of Gulf Stream Condo #8, to consider the following:
a. VARIANCE to permit the addition of outside emergency
stairs attached to the south end of the existing
building that will encroach three feet (3') into
the required fifteen foot (151) setback.
b. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW to permit the
addition of aluminum emergency stairs attached to the
south end of the existing building which would
encroach approximately 3' into the required setback.
Mr. Tajalli introduced himself and stated that he represents Mr. and Mrs.
McCrady in this matter. He said the McCradys feel that, in the event of
an emergency, they may not be able to safely exit their unit and are
requesting a variance to add outside emergency stairs to be bolted to the
south end of the existing building. Mr. Tajalli said the emergency
stairs will be accessed from their master bedroom through a window which
will be converted to a swing -out, lockable door and will match the main
entry door.
Mr. Tajalli stated that a neighbor reviewed the initial drawings which
indicated a protrusion of almost 4' past the edge of the building and he
was concerned that the protrusion would impact his privacy and property
value. He explained that there was enough space to push the stairs back
so that they now clear the corner of the building and the only extension
is to the south, which is heavily vegetated and has the least amount of
traffic. Mr. Tajalli said the stairs will not be obtrusive to the
landscaping; however, they may have to cut out a portion of the sodded
area and replace it with concrete pads in order to bolt down the stairs.
OMr. Smith asked about the existing storage units. Mr. Tajalli said the
shed area will be removed and totally eliminated. Chairman Ganger asked
about the construction timeframe, including the construction to convert
the window to a door. Mr. Tajalli said it would be about two days.
Mr. Tajalli asked that the Board consider the age and health of the
occupants and explained that Mrs. McCrady has health issues, she recently
had hip surgery and she suffers from anxiety. Vice -Chairman Morgan said
this is a variance to the Code and in order to qualify for a variance the
applicant must meet all eight (8) hardships. He said the Town Manager
Regular Meeting and Public Hearing - December 22, 2011
Architectural Review and Planning Board Page 3
believes this application does not appear to comply with five (5) code
sections. Vice -Chairman Morgan said he believes there are three (3)
sections that are not proven and that there is nothing unique or
different from others where they are suffering some sort of disadvantage
by the original design of the building. Mr. Randolph said that hardship
runs with the land and not the individual.
Chairman Ganger asked Clerk Taylor if there were any comments from
C) neighbors. Clerk Taylor said that Mr. Allis, who is present at this
hearing, stopped by Town Hall to review the drawings and had some
objections. Chairman Ganger asked Mr. Tajalli if he thought others in
the building would come forward with the same request if this were
approved and Mr. Tajalli said it is possible. Mr. Smith asked if the
Condo Association had addressed this matter. Mr. Tajalli said Mrs.
McCrady gave him a letter of authorization from the Association. Mr.
Stanley said if the Town approves this application the Condo Association
still has the right to reject it. He asked Mr. Tajalli if they discussed
moving the stairs. Mr. Tajalli said they want them in the proposed
location because the only window is in the master bedroom. Chairman
Ganger asked how they would currently exit their unit in an emergency.
Mr. Tajalli explained that the only door exits from the kitchen area onto
a catwalk and then down a stair case to the sidewalk.
Mr. William Allis introduced himself saying he resides in Unit #6 which
is just below the McCradys in Unit #8. He said he just learned of this
construction a week ago and it was unacceptable as it was first presented
because he felt it would intrude on his privacy and lower his property
value. Mr. Allis also stated that he is on the Association Board and he
said it was mentioned that this is what the McCradys were asking for, but
the Board has not specifically voted on this. He said his concerns have
been resolved and he no longer objects, but he was looking for
information because he believes there is a pipe in that location which
cannot be found. Chairman Ganger asked Clerk Taylor if there was a
survey issue and Clerk Taylor said she asked the architect for a new
survey and they had one done just for that corner.
Mr. Thrasher stated that his report stands as submitted and that his
recommendation is for the Board to recommend denial of the request for a
variance in that a hardship has not been proven on items 1, 2, 4, 7 & 8.
Mr. Smith moved and Vice -Chairman Morgan seconded to recommend denial of
O a variance to permit the addition of outside emergency stairs attached to
the south end of the existing building that will encroach three feet into
the required fifteen foot setback based on the finding that required
variance standards 1, 2, 4, 7, and 8 are not met. There was no
discussion. Roll Call: Mr. Stanley, AYE; Vice -Chairman Morgan, AYE; Mr.
Smith, AYE; Mr. Murphy, AYE; Chairman Ganger, AYE. The motion passed 5 -
0. Mr. Smith moved and Vice -Chairman Morgan seconded to recommend denial
of a Level III Architectural/Site Plan to permit the addition of aluminum
emergency stairs attached to the south end of the existing building which
will encroach approximately 3' into the required setback based on the
finding that the required variance standards 1, 3, 4, 7 and 8 are not
Regular Meeting and Public Hearing - December 22, 2011
Architectural Review and Planning Board Page 4
met. There was no discussion. Roll Call: Mr. Stanley, AYE; Vice -
Chairman Morgan, AYE; Mr. Smith, AYE; Mr. Murphy, AYE; Chairman Ganger,
AYE. The motion passed 5 - 0.
Clerk Taylor stated that the Town Commission will hear this application
at their Regular Meeting and Public Hearing which is scheduled for
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 9:00 A.M.
1 2. An application submitted by Seaside Builders, Tom
Laudani, as agent for John Arscott, owner of property
located at 582 Palm Way, Gulf Stream, Florida, legally
described as Lots 24 and 23A Polo Cove Subdivision, Gulf
Stream, Florida.
a. SIGN REVIEW to permit installation of a contractors
sign, Seaside Builders, at the above address that
shall not exceed 2 square feet in size and be white
background with black lettering.
Chairman Ganger asked for declaration of ex -parte communication. There
were no declarations. Tom Laudani of Seaside Builders introduced
himself and explained that he is requesting a standard contractors sign
at 582 Palm Way which will be 2 SF in size and will conform to Town
Code. Vice -Chairman Morgan moved and Mr. Murphy seconded to approve a
sign permit for erection of a contractors sign based on a finding that
the proposed sign meets the requirements of Code Section 66-447, subject
to a maximum height of 4' and maximum 2 SF sign size. There was no
discussion. Roll Call: Mr. Stanley, AYE; Vice -Chairman Morgan, AYE; Mr.
Smith, AYE; Mr. Murphy, AYE; Chairman Ganger, AYE. The motion passed 5 -
0.
3. An application submitted by Seaside Builders, Tom
Laudani, as agent for Harbor View Estates, owner of
property located at 1220 North Ocean Blvd., Gulf
Stream, Florida, legally described as Lots 4, 5 & N.
96' of 6, Golf Course Addition, Gulf Stream, Florida
a. SIGN REVIEW to permit installation of a contractors
sign, Seaside Builders, at the above address that
shall not exceed 2 square feet in size and be white
background with black lettering.
Chairman Ganger asked for declaration of ex -parte communication. There
were no declarations. Mr. Laudani explained that he is requesting a
standard contractors sign at 1220 N. Ocean Blvd. which will be 2 SF in
size and will conform to Town Code. Vice -Chairman Morgan asked if there
is any construction going on at this point. Mr. Laudani said the gates
Uare up, they are working to stabilize the site and the property has been
seeded. He said road construction is expected to begin within the next
six weeks. Mr. Laudani said the sign will identify the site and will
indicate Seaside as the exclusive builder. He said the sign will remain
through the completion of construction, including the construction of
homes. Mr. Laudani said realtors will have individual signs which will
be separate from the contractors sign.
Vice -Chairman Morgan commented that several vehicles have been parked
there. Mr. Laudani said he was aware of that, but they are not
associated with Seaside Builders. He said no work vehicles will be
Regular Meeting and Public Hearing - December 22, 2011
Architectural Review and Planning Board Page 5
parked there until such time as the hammerhead construction begins.
Chairman Ganger asked Clerk Taylor if the Town has received the drawings
and architectural history which was previously requested by the ARPB.
Clerk Taylor confirmed that it has been received. Mr. Thrasher asked
Mr. Laudani if they will be doing any irrigation. Mr. Laudani said he
realizes there have been complaints about the dusty conditions due to
the seed being folded into the top soil and he assured the Board that
C� watering would begin no later than Tuesday, December 27th. Mr. Thrasher
said sooner would be best.
Vice -Chairman Morgan moved and Mr. Murphy seconded to approve a sign
permit for erection of a contractors sign based on a finding that the
proposed sign meets the requirements of Code Section 66-447, subject to
a maximum height of 4 feet and a maximum 2 SF sign size. There was no
discussion. Roll Call: Mr. Stanley, AYE; Vice -Chairman Morgan, AYE; Mr.
Smith, AYE; Mr. Murphy, AYE; Chairman Ganger, AYE. The motion passed 5 -
0.
VII. Items by Staff.
A. Recommended Comprehensive Plan Amendments
1. Future Land Use Element
2. Transportation Element
3. Housing Element
4. Infrastructure Element
a. Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element
b. Solid Waste Sub -Element
c. Drainage & Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub -
Element
d. Potable Water Sub -Element
5. Coastal Management Element
6. Conservation Element
7. Recreation & Open Space Element
8. Intergovernmental Coordination Element
9. Capital Improvement Element
Marty Minor of Urban Design Kilday Studios prepared a Summary of
Amendments to the Town of Gulf Stream Comp Plan which was distributed to
the ARPB Members in their meeting packet. He said the Town Commission
reviewed the proposed amendments to the Comp Plan and Zoning Code at
their December meeting and their direction was to move forward and
present the proposed amendments to the Architectural Review and Planning
OBoard (ARPB). Mr. Minor explained that the ARPB will make their
recommendations to the Local Planning Agency (LPA). The LPA will decide
whether to send the amendments to the State and other required agencies,
such as the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and Palm Beach
County. The agencies will have 30 days to review the amendments and
make comments and then it will come back to the Town. The Town
Commission will then make the decision to either adopt or deny the
amendments.
Mr. Minor said the annexation of 16.6 acres created changing conditions
within the Town and, in addition, the State Legislature has made massive
changes to their growth management plan. He said the University of
Florida (BEBR) estimates that 98 permanent residents live within the
Regular Meeting and Public Hearing - December 22, 2011
Architectural Review and Planning Board Page 6
annexed area, which includes 102 existing dwelling units, 34 approved
but not yet built units, and less than an acre of vacant land. The
annexed area currently has a future land use designation of Palm Beach
County HR -12 (High Residential -12) which allows 12 units per acre. Mr.
Minor said the recommendation is to change that to the Town's current
future land use of MF (Multi -Family), which allows 5.7 units per acre
and is consistent with other multi -families within the Town. He said no
O commercial or industrial future land uses exist or are projected for
Gulf Stream and that the Town of Gulf Stream is essentially built -out
and will experience only minor fluctuations in populations.
Mr. Minor said the Level of Service for the provision of recreation
facilities, private and public, will be revised from 0.23 acre per
person to 0.1 acre per person, noting that the general standard is 5
acres of recreation per 1000 residents. Chairman Ganger asked if the
general standard differentiates between recreational areas which are
open to the public versus those that are private. Mr. Minor said it
does differential and he stated that one of the options provided through
growth management legislation is to be able to review and incorporate
this information into the Comp Plan. He said someone could convert a
recreational facility into something else without affecting the level of
service, but if they did so at the present time they would have to amend
the Town's Comp Plan to address that type of provision of recreational
services. Chairman Ganger said he was not sure that the Comp Plan
should contemplate population growth. He said Gulf Stream does not want
to grow and the reason the Town decided to annex the 16.6 acres of
unincorporated Palm Beach County was to prevent that area from
overgrowth.
Mr. Minor pointed out some additional items saying that during the
summer the State Legislature made concurrency optional. He said none of
the local governments took that option, they are still part of the
concurrency system and the Town is taking this opportunity to strengthen
their concurrency management system within its Comp Plan. With regard
to non -conforming densities, Mr. Minor said there are densities ranging
from 8 units to 16.5 units per acre within the annexed area and the
Town's density is 5.7 units per acre. He said there is a clause in the
Comp Plan that if an entire building was destroyed due to a hurricane or
an act of God they can rebuild as is. In addition, he said throughout
the Comp Plan some of the time frames have been eliminated, such as
those associated with certain actions or studies for situations
Ci) involving historic preservation or the creation of standards for the
citing of group homes. The State Law has changed and, although it is
still a goal within the State Growth Management Laws, there is no longer
an emphasis on immediacy, which allows local governments to decide when
they want to move forward with such studies.
Chairman Ganger commented that not long after the first Comp Plan a goal
was set to have historic preservation as a guide in the decision process
in situations such as the Spence Estate. He said there should be
something in the Comp Plan concerning historic preservation before the
Town loses more of their historic homes. Chairman Ganger also commented
that there are issues with group homes and he feels the Town should be
Regular Meeting and Public Hearing - December 22, 2011
Architectural Review and Planning Board Page 7
vigilant with regard to transient rentals, be aware of the situation
facing the City of Delray Beach and take action. Vice -Chairman Morgan
asked Chairman Ganger what he proposes. Chairman Ganger said he
mentioned to Mr. Minor in a telephone conversation that the premise
should be consistent with the Town's beliefs and more articulate in
putting forth what is important to the Town. Vice -Chairman Morgan asked
Mr. Minor if the Delray Beach group home situation could occur in the
O Town of Gulf Stream. Chairman Ganger said he has spoken to several
attorneys who say it could already be in planning stages without the
Town being aware.
Mr. Thrasher said the timeframe for these studies has been eliminated,
but not the potential to study and make changes in these areas. He
asked Mr. Minor to explain the timeframes. Mr. Minor said the timeframe
under the older growth management regulations required towns to meet and
adopt certain standards, such as group home citings, home-based
occupations, rentals less than 3 months and commercial uses, which are
all prohibited in the Zoning Code. Timeframes were required for
communities without specific regulations which the State wanted to
include in all comp plans and rather than making communities adopt
regulations immediately the State's focus in review of comp plans is on
larger issues of State concern. Mr. Minor said he took the opportunity
to eliminate the timeframes, but not the desire to adopt specific
regulations.
Chairman Ganger said he would like the ARPB to have more time to put
their thoughts together and clean up the Comp Plan before making their
recommendations to the LPA. He said he would like an opportunity to
address fundamental issues to give the LPA substantial goals and
planning guidelines. Clerk Taylor said she does not disagree, but
understood that when the annexation took place there were some time
constraints in bringing the Comp Plan up to reflect the annexation. She
said while there are other issues that should be considered, we should
move forward now and continue with other issues later. Clerk Taylor
said there are no limits on the number of Comp Plans submitted.
Mr. Minor said there are some studies to be done and the Board can
address some of the other issues under the Zoning Code where those types
of regulations occur. He suggested that the Board make their
recommendations to the LPA with the proposed amendments they have before
them at this time, including any suggested changes. Mr. Randolph said
Othe ARPB has a responsibility to deal with the density issue in a
reasonable time and urged the Board to move forward with the proposed
amendments now and address other issues later.
Both Chairman Ganger and Vice -Chairman Morgan suggested that ARPB
members meet to share ideas on some of the issues. Mr. Randolph said
the ARPB can hold a workshop, but it would be in violation of the
Sunshine Law for members to meet with each other outside of a meeting.
Mr. Thrasher said his recommendation is for the ARPB to move forward
with the proposed amendments as submitted by Mr. Minor. Chairman Ganger
said he would rather hold off on making their recommendations because
there are mistakes in the proposed amendments and he would prefer to
Regular Meeting and Public Hearing - December 22, 2011
Architectural Review and Planning Board Page 8
fine tune them before recommending them to the LPA. It was the
consensus of the Board and Staff that there would not be enough time to
hold a workshop, submit changes to Urban Design and have everything
ready to distribute in the Commission meeting packets. Clerk Taylor
explained that if the ARPB moves forward in recommending the proposed
amendments as submitted, the Commission will have l't reading of the
Ordinance to be able transmit the amendments to the DCA and other
required agencies on January 13th. Following the response from the DCA
and other agencies which should be within 30 da s, the Commission will
review and address their comments and have a 2° reading of the Ordinance
for adoption of the Comp Plan Amendments. Chairman Ganger said he is
uncomfortable with that timetable.
Mr. Randolph asked Mr. Minor if elements that do not relate to the
annexed area could be put off at this point in order to allow the ARPB
to deal with elements that do relate to the annexation, such as future
land use and transportation, in order to move forward. Mr. Minor said
yes because, generally, future land use is the main focus. He said,
however, because of an increase in population, there could be an issue
if someone were to ask how the sanitary elements and infrastructure
would be impacted. Chairman Ganger said the Town has commercial
enterprise which can be converted into a group home with transients who
are part owners. Mr. Randolph said the Board could move forward with
the proposed amendments with the understanding that there are concerns
with certain elements which the ARPB will be addressing to make changes.
Vice -Chairman Morgan moved and Mr. Murphy seconded to recommend approval
of the Summary of Amendments to the Town of Gulf Stream Comprehensive
Plan as submitted. Roll Call: Mr. Stanley, AYE; Vice -Chairman Morgan,
AYE; Mr. Smith, AYE; Mr. Murphy, AYE; Chairman Ganger, AYE. The motion
passed 5 - 0. Vice -Chairman Morgan moved and Mr. Murphy seconded a
motion to allow the Architectural Review and Planning Board to request
authority from the Town Commission to hold a Workshop for the purpose of
reviewing additional changes and amendments to the Gulf Stream Comp Plan
to submit adjustments to the Commission. Roll Call: Mr. Stanley, AYE;
Vice -Chairman Morgan, AYE; Mr. Smith, AYE; Mr. Murphy, AYE; Chairman
Ganger, AYE. The motion passed 5 - 0.
Mr. Randolph said, if the Board has no objection, Chairman Ganger could
bring any mistakes in the proposed amendments to Mr. Minor's attention
Gand, as long as they are not substantive, Mr. Minor can make the changes
' before the January meeting. The consensus of the Board was that they had
no objections. Mr. Thrasher said he would prefer that Chairman Ganger
brought the changes to Clerk Taylor to prepare them for Mr. Minor. Mr.
Smith suggested having a workshop at the next ARPB Meeting if the Agenda
is minimal. Clerk Taylor said she does not favor workshops because no
motions can be made. Mr. Randolph suggested calling it a Special
Meeting.
B. Code Review
1. Section 66-369 Docks (7); Pg. CD66:71
Materials & colors. Materials & colors of docks &
ancillary structures shall be considered as part of
Regular Meeting and Public Hearing - December 22, 2011
Architectural Review and Planning Board Page 9
architectural review and planning board consideration and
shall be maintained as approved.
2. Section 70-51 Minor accessory structures (2); Page CD70:24
in -ground swimming pools and spas
3. Section 70:238. Roofs (a); Page CD70:93
Required. White flat untextured tile, except that gray
slate or slate -style may be permitted on homes that are
predominately Georgian or British Colonial with Bermuda
influences subject to Level 11 approval.
4. Section 70-100. Roof and eave heights
Define preferred, discouraged and prohibited height of
entry feature.
Mr. Thrasher said these items have been accumulating for review by the
ARPB. He said the first step would be recommendations concerning these
items from the ARPB to the Commission. Chairman Ganger said that
because the roof issue has been a hot subject it should be addressed.
He said he would like to discuss the process for a code amendment that
would preclude or mitigate subdivision of lots that currently exceed 1
acre into smaller subdivision. Chairman Ganger said the subdivision of
the Spence property initiated a lot of talk in the community and he
suggested that the subdivision of lots be added to the list of items up
for discussion. Mr. Randolph said that the size of a lot is addressed
in the Zoning Ordinances which allows subdivision a property as long as
it meets existing Code requirements. He said there is case law that
says you cannot deny subdivision if it meets your existing Code and,
therefore, you will need to modify the Zoning Code. Vice -Chairman
Morgan said he believes the Town Code does allow denial and Section 70,
Subsection 4 addresses the matter, but it fell on deaf ears in the
application for subdivision of the Spence property. Mr. Randolph said
he did not believe the section to be applicable; however, he said it can
be added as an item for discussion in the future if the Board would like
to tighten it up.
Mr. Thrasher said he would like to get the discussion started today on
the items listed on the agenda. Chairman Ganger said they will discuss
the items listed and he also suggested adding the subdivision item. He
added that he would like Staff to have the assignment of identifying
property in the Town that could potentially be subdivided. Mr. Thrasher
said there are properties that could be subdivided, but he did not know
how many. Vice -Chairman Morgan said he would also like to explore
whether Section 70, Subsection 4 would allow this Board to limit further
subdivision of properties that can be subdivided. He also suggested
that FAR Standards be reviewed again. Mr. Stanley clarified that the
Board would like to identify properties that can be subdivided and look
into whether it is feasible to do an overlay including those properties
and change the regulations to a certain point where if someone wanted to
redevelop those properties against the code it would be a privately
initiated LDR amendment.
Mr. Randolph said this matter should be more broadly approached and
asked the Board if they want to add this item to the list. Chairman
Ganger said he would like it added to the list and he would like the
Regular Meeting and Public Hearing - December 22, 2011
Architectural Review and Planning Board Page 10
roof item to be a priority to prevent another resident from approaching
the Board for the slurry -coated tile. Mr. Randolph said that cannot
happen due to zoning in progress. Mr. Thrasher said these items are
addressed in sections of the Code that have caused many issues in
interpretation. Chairman Ganger asked Mr. Thrasher to summarize the
issues with Section 66-369 Docks and Ancillary Structures in terms of
materials and colors. Mr. Thrasher said the Board will discuss the
specifics of whether a dock can be concrete or made from real or false
wood, acceptable colors of docks, if any, and the extension of 5' from
the water line. Vice -Chairman Morgan said he has added FAR and
subdivision consideration items. Mr. Smith said that Mr. Thrasher
previously informed the Board that they do not have the authority to
regulate driveway elevations, but asked whether this matter should be
added to the list for discussion. Mr. Thrasher said it is something to
discuss, but he will have Marty Minor look into whether the Town can
legally regulate driveway elevations.
Vice -Chairman Morgan said that all of these items can be fairly involved
and suggested taking one item per meeting for discussion. He asked if
the ARPB is authorized to direct Mr. Minor to investigate and report on
these issues. Mr. Thrasher said we have historically operated that way
and are authorized to do so, and he added that some of the items will be
controversial and some will not, such as pools and grottos. Clerk
Taylor said most of the items on this list have already been discussed
and staff has been authorized to do something about them. Chairman
Ganger recommended the roof issue be scheduled for the next meeting and
asked the Board and Staff to be prepared. Clerk Taylor suggested
considering the eave heights for discussion at the next meeting also.
VIII. Items by Board Members. There were no items by the Board
Members.
IX. Public. There were no items by the Public.
X. Adjournment. Chairman Ganger adjourned the meeting at
approximately 10:30 A.M.
Z�4�a
Gail C. Abbale
Administrative Assistant