Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout1992-010Member MtfchtlI introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 0 RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR A LOT DIVISION/COMBINATION FOR CLINTON THIES AND UNITED POWER ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, Clinton Thies (Thies) is the fee owner of certain property located near Co. Rd. 24 and Willow Drive, which property is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto; and WHEREAS, United Power Association (UPA) is the fee owner of certain property located west of Willow Drive adjacent to the Thies property, which property is used for an electrical power substation and is legally described on Exhibit B attached hereto; and WHEREAS, UPA wishes to purchase that portion of the Thies property west of Willow Drive (Subject Property) for combination with its existing lot to accommodate an expansion of the substation; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property, which is legally described on Exhibit C attached hereto, is zoned for rural residential use but does not contain adequate soils to permit construction of an individual septic system; and WHEREAS, because of the lack of adequate soils for an individual septic system, the city would never permit the division of the Thies property but for the representations made by UPA regarding the proposed use of the land; and WHEREAS, this matter was reviewed by the planning commission on January 14, 1992 and by the city council on February 4, 1992. RHB29580 ME230-147 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of . Medina, Minnesota that a lot division/combination be granted to Thies and UPA for the described property, subject to the following: 1. No park dedication fee shall be required due to the fact that the Subject Property will not be used for residential purposes; 2. Thies and UPA must convey to the city the utility, drainage and right- of-way easements required by the city engineer; 3. The Subject Property must be combined with the UPA property and the combined Parcel must be subject to a restrictive covenant in a form acceptable to the city attorney prohibiting its use for residential or any other purpose requiring the construction of an individual septic system; 4. Thies and UPA must submit abstracts of title or registered property abstracts covering all of the property subject to this application for review by the city attorney; and 5. Thies and UPA must pay to the city for administrative expenses thg amount determined by the city staff to represent the actual cost to the city of reviewing the lot division/combination. Dated: dteut/d , 1992. Gary M. cromite, Mayor ATTEST: Benny Reehl, Clerk -Treasurer fauna L. , Monro(, AC i (1.3 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Acrorn if and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: M I-tChe 11) n aCO f e) Zi e-E (O u and the following voted against same: none__ Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RHB29580 ME230-147 2