HomeMy Public PortalAbout08.20.2019 Complete Work Session Packet Posted 5/29/2009 Page 1 of 1
WORK SESSION AGENDA
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 20, 2019
6:00 P.M.
Medina City Hall
2052 County Road 24
I. Call to Order
II. Chippewa Road and Arrowhead Drive Visioning Study Update*
(30 minutes)
III. 2020 Budget* (30 minutes)
IV. Adjourn
*If work session is not finished by 7 p.m., it will recess, and discussion will continue following
the regular City Council meeting.
Posted 8.15.19
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council, through City Administrator Scott Johnson
FROM: Jim Stremel, City Engineer; Chuck Rickart, Traffic Engineer
DATE: August 15, 2019
MEETING: August 20, 2019
SUBJECT: Chippewa Rd & Arrowhead Dr Visioning Study – Concept Plan Review
Background:
The City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies the need to extend Chippewa Road from Mohawk
Drive to Arrowhead Drive. These improvements were identified in conjunction with the capacity
and operations needs for TH 55. The plan indicates that “MnDOT and the City of Medina should
work cooperatively, as redevelopment occurs, to close existing direct access driveways onto TH 55
and relocate direct access to a frontage/backage road system, consistent with the 2007 TH 55 design
concept vision”. That concept vision included the idea of connecting Chippewa Road from Mohawk
Drive to Arrowhead Drive, completing the roadway network in the area.
The 2040 Comprehensive Plan anticipates residential and commercial growth within the Chippewa
Road and Arrowhead Drive corridors north of TH 55. A visioning study for the Chippewa Road and
Arrowhead Drive corridors has commenced as directed by City Staff and Council. The primary goal
of this study is to develop a cohesive plan that can be provided to property owners, developers, and
other stakeholders which guide the transportation needs, right-of-way, public utilities, and other
parameters within this corridor.
The intent of this memo is to provide an update to the City Council as to what has been completed
with the study to date including the traffic forecasting, traffic analysis, and concept plan
development. City staff and the engineering team are asking for City Council comments, questions,
and direction in determining a preferred option that can then be developed in greater detail.
Traffic Forecasting & Analysis:
WSB’s traffic engineers developed a 2040 ADT traffic forecast for Chippewa Road, Arrowhead
Drive, and each of the primary intersections within the corridor. The projected traffic was based on
traffic generation for the proposed development and/or anticipated land use as well as the historical
traffic count trends for the area. The estimated existing and projected 2040 traffic volumes are
shown below:
2
Location Existing 2019 Projected 2040
Arrowhead Drive
Meander Rd to Chippewa Rd 1050 5800
Arrowhead Drive
North of Chippewa Rd 1050 1320
Chippewa Road
Arrowhead Dr to Mohawk Dr NA 7100
Chippewa Road
West of Mohawk Dr 690 3900
Mohawk Drive
TH 55 to Chippewa Rd 375 1800
Mohawk Drive
North of Chippewa Rd 100 900
A traffic analysis was completed evaluating the existing and projected traffic operations for
Chippewa Road and Arrowhead Drive corridors, including the intersections of Chippewa Road at
Mohawk Drive, Chippewa Road at Arrowhead Drive, Arrowhead Drive at Meander Road and
Arrowhead Drive at TH 55.
The traffic operations were evaluated using Synchro/SimTraffic software for the signal and stop sign
analysis and RODEL software for the roundabout analysis. The analysis documented the corridor
operation and recommendation for intersection control and lane configuration improvements.
The results of the operations analysis assuming the future projected 2040 traffic conditions provided
the following conclusions and recommendations:
TH 55 at Arrowhead Drive:
· The southbound Arrowhead Dr left turn to TH 55 requires 200 feet of vehicle queue storage.
· With the two traditional intersection concepts (OSI driveway in existing location in Figure 2
or relocated to the existing Meander Rd in Figure 1) the full 200 feet of vehicle queue storage
to TH 55 can be provided.
· With the roundabout option (Figure 3) at the existing Meander Rd intersection, 190 feet of
the required 200 feet vehicle queue storage to TH 55 could be provided.
Arrowhead Drive at Meander Road/OSI Driveway:
· The northbound Arrowhead Dr left turn into the OSI driveway requires 100 feet of vehicle
queue storage.
· With the traditional intersection option (Figure 1) of the relocating the OSI driveway to line
up with Meander Rd the following was concluded:
o Only 25 feet of northbound left turn vehicle queue storage can be provided for the
OSI driveway. The analysis also indicates that in the short term with the OSI
expansion and moderate traffic from the north on Arrowhead Drive, this
configuration would be adequate.
o A double left turn configuration at the TH 55 intersection is feasible and would
provide a longer queue length at the left turn lane into OSI (the double left turn lanes
3
at TH 55 would be shorter in length). With that being said, there would be significant
coordination with MnDOT, possible signal phasing changes, widening of Arrowhead
Dr on the north side of the intersection, and possible lane configuration changes on
the south side of the TH 55 intersection.
· With the traditional intersection option (Figure 2) of the relocated Meander Rd to line up
with the existing OSI driveway the following was concluded:
o 120 feet of northbound left turn vehicle queue storage can be provided for the OSI
driveway.
o The Meander Road approach can be designed with 30 MPH curves to lessen the
impacts to the wetland north of Meander Road.
o The intersection could be shifted 20 feet south to lessen the impacts to the wetland
north of Meander Road.
· With the roundabout option (Figure 3) at the existing Meander Road the left turn volume and
queueing can into OSI driveway can be accommodated.
Arrowhead Drive at future Chippewa Road:
· With the alignment option (Figure 1) that provides a curve on Chippewa Road to Arrowhead
Drive with a traditional tee intersection the following was concluded:
o Northbound Arrowhead Dr right turn lane
o Eastbound Chippewa Road right turn lane
o Side street stop control, stopping southbound Arrowhead Drive
· With the alignment option (Figure 1) that provides a traditional four-legged intersection, the
following was concluded:
o Northbound Arrowhead Dr right turn lane
o Eastbound Chippewa Road right turn lane
o All-way stop control
· With the roundabout concept (Figure 3) all approaches only require a single lane.
Chippewa Road at Mohawk Drive:
· With the alignment option (Figure 1 and 2) that provides a traditional four-legged
intersection the following was concluded:
o Northbound Mohawk Dr right turn lane
o Side street stop control, stopping northbound and southbound on Mohawk Drive
· With the roundabout concept (Figure 3) all approaches only require a single lane.
Concept Plan Development:
From the traffic forecasting and analysis, three horizontal geometric concept plans were developed
based on a 40 MPH design speed that included the recommended geometric improvements,
preliminary intersection control design (stop condition or roundabout), and right-of-way needs.
Exhibits have been enclosed with this memo for reference.
· Option 1 (Figure 1) is comprised of a “T” intersection at the Arrowhead Drive and Chippewa
Road point of intersection with traditional intersections at Mohawk Drive and Meander Road.
4
o Chippewa Rd/Mohawk Dr Intersection:
Provides area access for existing and future development.
o Chippewa Rd/Arrowhead Dr Intersection:
Encourages traffic to follow Arrowhead Dr to Chippewa Rd, and discourages
traffic north on Arrowhead Dr towards the Bridgewater development
Additional cost and right of way required to provide the curved alignment
than a traditional intersection.
o Arrowhead Dr/Meander Rd Intersection:
Does not impact wetland on the north side of the existing Meander Rd
Does not provide sufficient vehicle queue storage for the northbound left turn
into the OSI driveway for future 2040 traffic condition.
o Arrowhead Dr/TH 55 Intersection:
Provides the required vehicle queue storage for the southbound left turn to
TH 55.
· Option 2 (Figure 2) is comprised of traditional intersections at Mohawk Dr, Arrowhead Dr,
and Meander Rd.
o Chippewa Rd/Mohawk Dr Intersection:
Provides area access for existing and future development.
o Chippewa Rd/Arrowhead Dr Intersection:
Does not encourages traffic to follow Chippewa Rd.
Less cost and right of way required than Option 1.
o Arrowhead Dr/Meander Rd Intersection:
Impacts the wetland on the north side of the existing Meander Rd
Provides sufficient vehicle queue storage for the northbound left turn into the
OSI driveway for future 2040 traffic condition.
o Arrowhead Dr/TH 55 Intersection:
Provides the required vehicle queue storage for the southbound left turn to
TH 55
· Option 3 (Figure 3) is comprised of roundabout intersections at Mohawk Dr, Arrowhead Dr,
and Meander Rd.
o Chippewa/Mohawk Intersection:
Provides area access for existing and future development
Higher cost than a traditional intersection
Additional right of way needed from adjacent properties to the west
o Chippewa/Arrowhead Intersection:
Higher cost than a traditional intersection
Additional right of way needed from surrounding properties
o Arrowhead/Meander Intersection:
Provides better traffic operations than Option 1 or Option 2
Higher cost than a traditional intersection and may require a retaining wall to
accommodate grading on the west side
No (or minimal) impact to the wetland on the north side of Meander Rd
Additional right of way needed on the OSI property
o Arrowhead/TH 55 Intersection:
Does not provide the required vehicle queue storage for the southbound left
turn to TH 55
5
Next Steps:
Based on City Council input and direction, WSB will proceed with further refinement of the
preferred option including additional geometric design (vertical), water/sewer utility review, and
more refined cost estimating of the preferred option. A review of the environmental permitting
requirements and timelines will also be included with the final report.
Consider scheduling a public informational open house on Tuesday, October 15th prior to or in
conjunction with the Council work session. The proposed format for this community engagement
element is an informal open house in the council chambers.
At the November 5th City Council meeting, provide a final report, preferred concept plan, costs
estimate, and other conclusions and recommendations developed during the process.
City Council Action Requested:
Provide input and direction to City Staff on a preferred option. Confirm format for open house.
W
S
B
F
il
e
n
a
m
e
:
D
a
t
e
:
P
r
in
t
e
d
:
8
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
9
K:
\
0
1
4
4
3
4
-
0
0
0
\
C
a
d
\
E
x
h
ib
it
s
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
in
a
r
y
A
li
g
n
m
e
n
t
s
\
O
p
t
i
o
n
1
T
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
d
g
n
City of Medina
Chippewa Road & Arrowhead Drive Corridor Visioning Study
2'
LC
TRAIL
8'
URBAN SECTION WITH TRAIL
THRU LANE
16'
THRU LANE
16'
80'R/W R/W
BLVD
6'
CURB & GUTTER
B618 CONCRETE
CURB & GUTTER
B618 CONCRETE
CHIPPEWA ROAD
2'
URBAN SECTION WITH TRAIL
THRU LANE
16'
THRU LANE
16'
80'R/WR/W
CURB & GUTTER
B618 CONCRETE
CURB & GUTTER
B618 CONCRETE
TRAIL
10.67'
ARROWHEAD DRIVE
LC
N
0
SCALE IN FEET
150 300
Figure 1
MINNESOTA
55 Meander Road
A
r
r
o
w
h
e
a
d
D
r
i
v
e
M
o
h
a
w
k
D
r
i
v
e
Chippewa Road
T Intersection
OHW = 980.6
DNR Jurisdictional Wetlands
WCA Wetlands
OHW: 978.3
OHW: 980.6
OHW Separation
Average Daily Traffic
XXX EXISTING ADT
PROJECT 2040 ADT(XXX)
Queue Analysis
SB LEFT
NB LEFT
200
25
AVAILABLE
200
100
REQUIRED
1050
(5800)
1
0
3
0
(
1
3
2
0
)
0
(7100)
1
0
0
(
9
0
0
)
690
(3900)
3
7
5
(
1
8
0
0
)
S
T
O
P
STOP
S
T
OP
STOP
STOP
W
S
B
F
il
e
n
a
m
e
:
D
a
t
e
:
P
r
in
t
e
d
:
8
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
9
K:
\
0
1
4
4
3
4
-
0
0
0
\
C
a
d
\
E
x
h
ib
it
s
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
in
a
r
y
A
li
g
n
m
e
n
t
s
\
O
p
t
i
o
n
2
T
r
a
d
it
i
o
n
a
l
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
d
g
n
City of Medina
Chippewa Road & Arrowhead Drive Corridor Visioning Study
2'
LC
TRAIL
8'
URBAN SECTION WITH TRAIL
THRU LANE
16'
THRU LANE
16'
80'R/W R/W
BLVD
6'
CURB & GUTTER
B618 CONCRETE
CURB & GUTTER
B618 CONCRETE
CHIPPEWA ROAD
2'
URBAN SECTION WITH TRAIL
THRU LANE
16'
THRU LANE
16'
80'R/WR/W
CURB & GUTTER
B618 CONCRETE
CURB & GUTTER
B618 CONCRETE
TRAIL
10.67'
ARROWHEAD DRIVE
LC
N
0
SCALE IN FEET
150 300
Figure 2
Traditional Intersection
MINNESOTA
55 Meander Road
A
r
r
o
w
h
e
a
d
D
r
i
v
e
M
o
h
a
w
k
D
r
i
v
e
Chippewa Road
WCA Wetlands
OHW = 980.6
DNR Jurisdictional Wetlands
OHW: 978.3
OHW: 980.6
OHW Separation
3
7
5
(
1
8
0
0
)
690
(3900)
0
(7100)
1
0
3
0
(
1
3
2
0
)
1050
(5800)
Average Daily Traffic
XXX EXISTING ADT
PROJECT 2040 ADT(XXX)
Queue Analysis
SB LEFT
NB LEFT
200
100
REQUIRED
200
120
AVAILABLE
STOP
1
0
0
(
9
0
0
)
S
T
O
P
S
T
OP
S
T
O
PSTOP
S
T
OP
STOP
W
S
B
F
il
e
n
a
m
e
:
D
a
t
e
:
P
r
in
t
e
d
:
8
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
9
K:
\
0
1
4
4
3
4
-
0
0
0
\
C
a
d
\
E
x
h
ib
it
s
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
in
a
r
y
A
li
g
n
m
e
n
t
s
\
O
p
t
i
o
n
3
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
d
g
n
City of Medina
Chippewa Road & Arrowhead Drive Corridor Visioning Study
2'
LC
TRAIL
8'
URBAN SECTION WITH TRAIL
THRU LANE
16'
THRU LANE
16'
80'R/W R/W
BLVD
6'
CURB & GUTTER
B618 CONCRETE
CURB & GUTTER
B618 CONCRETE
CHIPPEWA ROAD
2'
URBAN SECTION WITH TRAIL
THRU LANE
16'
THRU LANE
16'
80'R/WR/W
CURB & GUTTER
B618 CONCRETE
CURB & GUTTER
B618 CONCRETE
TRAIL
10.67'
ARROWHEAD DRIVE
LC
N
0
SCALE IN FEET
150 300
Figure 3
Roundabout Intersection
MINNESOTA
55 Meander Road
A
r
r
o
w
h
e
a
d
D
r
i
v
e
M
o
h
a
w
k
D
r
i
v
e
Chippewa Road
OHW = 980.6
DNR Jurisdictional Wetlands
WCA Wetlands
OHW: 978.3
OHW Separation
OHW: 980.6
Queue Analysis
SB LEFT
NB LEFT
190
NA
AVAILABLE Average Daily Traffic
XXX EXISTING ADT
PROJECT 2040 ADT(XXX)
1050
(5800)
1
0
3
0
(
1
3
2
0
)
0
(7100)
3
7
5
(
1
8
0
0
)
1
0
0
(
9
0
0
)
690
(3900)
200
NA
REQUIRED
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Erin Barnhart, Finance Director
DATE: August 13, 2019
SUBJ: 2020 Preliminary Budget Summary
Background
The following is a summary of the budget discussion from the July 16th work session with the
following adjustments:
• General Fund budget increase of $170,543 has been decreased to $164,063.
• Proposed tax rate increase of 22.617% has decreased to 22.531% (fiscal disparities)
• Equipment capital levy rounded from $312,409 to $312,500.
• All proposed fire budgets have been received.
Tax Levy
2020 overall increase = 9.7%
4.6% change in market value
• 1.9% new construction from 2018
• 2.7% change in MV
4.7% change in tax capacity
2020 tax rate = 22.531%; 4.7% increase
General Fund
Medina’s 2020 preliminary General Fund budget estimates an overall increase of $164,063;
3.3% levy increase.
Enterprise Funds
Proposed increases for 2020:
• Water 1.5%
• Sewer 2%
• Storm Water 3%
Work Session
2
Municipal Park Fund
Increase levy from $14,000 to $112,000; a $98,000 increase to finance 30-year park replacement
(current assets) needs in lieu of bonding.
Equipment Fund
Increase levy from $134,500 to $312,500, a $178,000 increase to finance on going equipment
replacement needs in lieu of bonding.
Supplemental Revenue
• Conduit Bond – allocated to Equipment fund
• Antenna revenue – allocate to ALHOA
Water/Sewer Connection Fees
• No proposed changes for 2020 – per 2018 utility rate analysis.
• Adam’s Pest Control request discussion. (See attached memo in budget packet.)
Resolution No. 2019-
September 3, 2019
Member _____ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2019-
RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED TAX LEVY FOR 2020
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has adopted legislation, which requires all
municipalities to pass a resolution adopting a preliminary budget and certifying the total proposed
tax levy amount to the County Auditor prior to September 30, 2019; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Medina, Minnesota, to comply with this law and
submit a proposed property tax levy including general operating and debt levies; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the City of Medina,
County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following sums of money be proposed for 2020 upon the
taxable property in the City of Medina, for the following purposes: To raise $3,434,452 as adequate
revenue for the general fund operating budget, $533,819 as adequate revenue for debt service,
$312,500 for capital equipment and $112,000 for municipal park fund.
General Fund $3,434,452
Capital Equipment $ 312,500
Municipal Park Fund $ 112,000
Debt Service:
2010A G.O. Improvement Bonds $ 29,500
2011B Taxable G.O. Improvement Bonds $ 60,000
2012A G.O. CIP Bonds $ 243,705
2013A G.O. Refunding Bonds $ 137,361
2015A G.O. Improvement Bonds $ 63,253
Total Levy: $4,392,771
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk, Jodi Gallup, is hereby instructed to transmit
a certified copy of this resolution to the county auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Date: September 3, 2019.
____________________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
Agenda Item
Resolution No. 2019- 2
September 3, 2019
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _____
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF MEDINA
GENERAL FUND
PRELIMINARY 2020 BUDGET
2020 Amount Percentage
2017 2017 2018 2018 2019 2019 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Actual Budget Actual Budget YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
1 Property Tax Levy 3,134,977 3,132,281 3,229,026 3,154,881 3,325,897 1,689,572 3,434,452 108,555 3.3%
2 Other Taxes 30,000 73,488 30,000 51,358 33,000 44,342 75,000 42,000 127.3%
3 Licenses and Permits 372,800 595,499 374,300 592,277 377,400 340,075 390,669 13,269 3.5%
4 Intergovernmental 207,618 256,433 232,118 271,965 263,910 72,426 279,773 15,863 6.0%
5 Charges for Services 112,831 143,411 124,564 130,169 123,146 101,711 138,087 14,941 12.1%
6 Fines and Forfeitures 105,000 96,050 105,000 88,044 110,000 51,608 95,000 (15,000) -13.6%
7 Special Assessments 1,000 12,545 0 1,761 1,715 444 0 (1,715) -100.0%
8 Miscellaneous 128,167 182,453 108,225 215,518 123,698 87,141 104,237 (19,461) -15.7%
9 Sale of Assets 30003000000 0 N/A
10 Transfers In 217,048 217,049 223,110 208,110 213,572 0 219,183 5,611 2.6%
11 Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources 4,309,741 4,709,209 4,426,643 4,714,083 4,572,338 2,387,319 4,736,401 164,063 3.6%
EXPENDITURES & OTHER FINANCING USES:
General Government:
12 Mayor & Council 26,294 25,323 25,144 25,273 25,644 15,828 25,543 (101) -0.4%
13 Administration 591,789 568,959 602,321 599,335 630,578 410,546 660,430 29,852 4.7%
14 Elections 10,900 1,501 10,900 15,235 11,400 1,069 15,400 4,000 35.1%
15 Assessing 88,872 90,515 90,493 91,229 93,840 54,194 98,066 4,226 4.5%
16 Planning & Zoning 190,150 191,825 193,840 169,879 189,411 97,359 191,105 1,694 0.9%
17 Comprehensive Plan 8,000 125 8,000 0 8,000 0 8,000 0 0.0%
18 Data Processing 72,850 73,271 82,083 79,586 82,083 47,456 88,704 6,621 8.1%
19 Police/Public Works Facility 69,415 69,521 69,415 79,670 76,415 39,705 77,500 1,085 1.4%
20 Municipal Building 48,410 39,740 39,100 40,994 60,810 30,695 61,000 190 0.3%
21 Unallocated 2,300 0 2,100 0 2,100 0 0 (2,100) -100.0%
22 Total General Government 1,108,980 1,060,780 1,123,396 1,101,200 1,180,281 696,852 1,225,748 45,467 3.9%
Public Safety:
23 Police 1,564,597 1,525,729 1,617,770 1,647,492 1,651,875 903,372 1,747,303 95,428 5.8%
24 Police Records Management 8,850 8,561 8,850 8,693 8,850 8,905 13,500 4,650 52.5%
25 Fire 394,172 426,262 424,716 413,375 446,242 284,886 414,109 (32,133) -7.2%
26 Building Inspections 300,006 240,836 312,013 409,365 318,343 89,455 330,718 12,375 3.9%
27 Emergency Management 5,200 4,246 5,200 3,990 5,200 4,722 5,800 600 11.5%
28 Total Public Safety 2,272,825 2,205,634 2,368,549 2,482,916 2,430,510 1,291,341 2,511,430 80,920 3.3%
Public Works:
29 Public Works 708,212 618,315 706,455 641,221 726,877 361,076 749,449 22,572 3.1%
30 Sanitation & Recycling 15,112 13,302 18,146 12,567 20,080 8,040 21,105 1,025 5.1%
31 Total Public Works 723,324 631,617 724,601 653,789 746,957 369,116 770,555 23,597 3.2%
Parks & Recreation:
32 Community Building 33,950 32,540 37,127 50,694 41,146 15,851 41,808 662 1.6%
33 Parks 168,662 165,077 170,970 242,850 169,444 134,395 182,859 13,415 7.9%
34 Total Parks & Recreation 202,612 197,617 208,097 293,544 210,590 150,247 224,667 14,077 6.7%
35 Transfers Out 2,000 2,000 2,000 53,362 4,000 0 4,000 0 0.0%
36 Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses 4,309,741 4,097,648 4,426,643 4,584,810 4,572,338 2,507,555 4,736,401 164,062 3.6%
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES AND
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES OVER (UNDER)
37 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 0 611,561 0 129,273 0 (120,236) (0) (0) N/A
1
City of Medina
2019 Proposed Property Tax Scenario
Residential Homesteads
SCENARIO - GENERAL FUND LEVY PLUS 3.3%
2019 2020 2019-2020
Budget Proposed Change
1 City Tax Rate:21.528% 22.531% 4.7%
2
3 General Fund Levy:$3,325,897 $3,434,452 $108,555
4
5 Debt Service & Capital Levies:$676,997 $958,319 $281,322
6
7 Total Levy:$4,002,894 $4,392,771 $389,877
8
9 Change in Total Levy:9.7%
10
11 2019 CITY PROPERTY TAXES
12
13 Homestead City Local City
14 Market Market Value Tax Tax Capacity Property
15 Value Exclusion Capacity Rate Taxes
16 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019
17
18 $100,000 ($28,200) $718 21.528% $155
19 $200,000 ($19,200) $1,808 21.528% $389
20 $300,000 ($10,200) $2,898 21.528% $624
21 $400,000 ($1,200) $3,988 21.528% $859
22 $500,000 $0 $5,000 21.528% $1,076
23 $600,000 $0 $6,250 21.528% $1,345
24 $750,000 $0 $8,125 21.528% $1,749
25 $800,000 $0 $8,750 21.528% $1,884
26 $900,000 $0 $10,000 21.528% $2,153
27 $1,000,000 $0 $11,250 21.528% $2,422
28
29 2020 CITY PROPERTY TAXES (WITH NO MARKET VALUE CHANGE)
30
31 Market Homestead City Local City Property Percentage
32 Value Market Value Tax Tax Capacity Property Taxes Tax
33 2020 Exclusion Capacity Rate Taxes Increase Increase
34 NO CHANGE 2020 2020 2020 2020 (Decrease) (Decrease)
35
36 $100,000 ($28,200) $718 22.531% $162 $7 4.7%
37 $200,000 ($19,200) $1,808 22.531% $407 $18 4.7%
38 $300,000 ($10,200) $2,898 22.531% $653 $29 4.7%
39 $400,000 ($1,200) $3,988 22.531% $899 $40 4.7%
40 $500,000 $0 $5,000 22.531% $1,127 $50 4.7%
41 $600,000 $0 $6,250 22.531% $1,408 $63 4.7%
42 $750,000 $0 $8,125 22.531% $1,831 $82 4.7%
43 $800,000 $0 $8,750 22.531% $1,971 $88 4.7%
44 $900,000 $0 $10,000 22.531% $2,253 $100 4.7%
45 $1,000,000 $0 $11,250 22.531% $2,535 $113 4.7%
46
47 2020 CITY PROPERTY TAXES (WITH MARKET VALUE INCREASE)
48
49 Market
50 Value Homestead City Local City Property Percentage
51 2020 Market Value Tax Tax Capacity Property Taxes Tax
52 INCREASE OF Exclusion Capacity Rate Taxes Increase Increase
53 5.0%2020 2020 2020 2020 (Decrease) (Decrease)
54
55 $105,000 ($27,800) $772 22.531% $174 $19 12.5%
56 $210,000 ($18,300) $1,917 22.531% $432 $43 11.0%
57 $315,000 ($8,900) $3,061 22.531% $690 $66 10.5%
58 $420,000 $0 $4,200 22.531% $946 $88 10.2%
59 $525,000 $0 $5,313 22.531% $1,197 $121 11.2%
60 $630,000 $0 $6,625 22.531% $1,493 $147 10.9%
61 $787,500 $0 $8,594 22.531% $1,936 $187 10.7%
62 $840,000 $0 $9,250 22.531% $2,084 $200 10.6%
63 $945,000 $0 $10,563 22.531% $2,380 $227 10.6%
64 $1,050,000 $0 $11,875 22.531% $2,676 $254 10.5%
2
OPERATING 2016
1 Hamel 202,215.00$ 64.61% 221,000.00$ 66.47% 238,000.00$ 70.37% 257,500.00$ 71.10% 266,550.00$ 72.21%
2 Loretto 79,978.87$ 25.56% 79,799.83$ 24.00% 71,380.21$ 21.11% 75,505.99$ 20.85% 71,277.00$ 19.31%
3 Long Lake 25,263.00$ 8.07% 26,015.00$ 7.82% 22,994.00$ 6.80% 23,165.00$ 6.40% 25,061.00$ 6.79%
4 Maple Plain 5,502.26$ 1.76% 5,667.33$ 1.70% 5,837.35$ 1.73% 6,012.47$ 1.66% 6,223.00$ 1.69%
5 312,959.13$ 332,482.16$ 338,211.56$ 362,183.46$ 369,111.00$
7 CAPITAL1
8 Hamel 70,000.00$ 70.99% 73,000.00$ 73.00% 73,000.00$ 68.04% 73,000.00$ 74.58% 75,000.00$ 75.09%
9 Loretto 22,600.50$ 22.92% 21,000.00$ 21.00% 28,290.00$ 26.37% 18,877.00$ 19.29% 18,877.00$ 18.90%
10 Long Lake 6,000.00$ 6.09% 6,000.00$ 6.00% 6,000.00$ 5.59% 6,000.00$ 6.13% 6,000.00$ 6.01%
11 Maple Plain -$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ 0.00%
12 98,600.50$ 100,000.00$ 107,290.00$ 97,877.00$ 99,877.00$
13 TOTAL CONTRACT
14 Hamel 272,215.00$ 66.14% 294,000.00$ 68.94% 311,000.00$ 70.28% 330,500.00$ 71.84% 341,550.00$ 72.83%
15 Loretto 102,579.37$ 24.92% 100,799.83$ 23.64% 99,670.21$ 22.52% 94,382.99$ 20.52% 90,154.00$ 19.22%
16 Long Lake 31,263.00$ 7.60% 25,994.00$ 6.10% 25,994.00$ 5.87% 29,165.00$ 6.34% 31,061.00$ 6.62%
17 Maple Plain 5,502.26$ 1.34% 5,667.33$ 1.33% 5,837.35$ 1.32% 6,012.47$ 1.31% 6,223.00$ 1.33%
18 411,559.63$ 426,461.16$ 442,501.56$ 460,060.46$ 468,988.00$
19
20
23 MARKET VALUE2 2016
24 Hamel 1,091,236,400 74.32% 1,159,793,700 74.28% 1,225,474,500 74.75% 1,260,512,200 74.61% 1,339,983,100 75.18%
25 Loretto 201,880,400 13.75% 211,332,400 13.53% 220,747,500 13.46% 229,443,300 13.58% 235,285,700 13.20%
26 Long Lake 160,510,500 10.93% 175,143,000 11.22% 176,168,100 10.75% 181,686,900 10.75% 188,447,300 10.57%
27 Maple Plain 14,678,000 1.00% 15,182,100 0.97% 17,138,100 1.05% 17,885,000 1.06% 18,707,100 1.05%
28 1,468,305,300 1,561,451,200 1,639,528,200 1,689,527,400 1,782,423,200
30 CALLS3 2016
31 Hamel 165 72.05% 170 186
32 Loretto 45 19.65% 30 18
33 Long Lake 16 6.99% 19 13
34 Maple Plain 3 1.31% 16 13
35 229 235 230
37
CONSUMER PRICE INDEX
(CPI-U)4 (June-June)2016
38 1st Half 2015 229.374 1st Half 2016 232.777 1st Half 2017 238.152 1st Half 2018 243.77 1st Half 2019
39 1st Half 2016 232.777 1st Half 2017 238.152 1st Half 2018 243.77 1st Half 2019 1st Half 2020
40
% Change from
Prior Year 1.48%
% Change from
Prior Year 2.31%
% Change from
Prior Year 2.36%
% Change from
Prior Year
% Change from
Prior Year
42
43
44
45
46
47
2020
FIRE CONTRACT DETAIL
The City of Medina is divided into four geographic areas (see map attached) each covered by a different fire department: Hamel, Loretto,
Maple Plain and Long Lake. Each area is served by a fire department not more than ten minutes travel time away. The ten minute designation meets
the code and standards of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), national standard used throughout the state of Minnesota.
2017 2018 2019
2 Market Values are based on prior year valuations. Pertains to Hamel, Loretto & Long Lake contracts where increases are based on market value and calls.
Analytics by Contract Methodology
2017 2018 2019 2020
2017 2018 2019 2020
2017 2018 2019 2020
1 2013 Capital was combined with operating budget.
3 Call numbers come from prior year actuals. Pertains to Hamel, Loretto & Long Lake contracts as above.
4Consumer Price Index from US Dept. of Labor, Minn / St Paul, All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), June to June. Base Year 1982-1984 = 100. Pertains to Maple Plain Fire
Contract where increases are based on CPI-U data alone. 3
Analytics by Contract Methodology
49
50 POPULATION4 2016
51 Hamel 4,668 74.87% 4,763 75.17% 5,074 76.33% 5,162 76.55% 5,359 76.99%
52 Loretto 801 12.85% 802 12.67% 801 12.05% 804 11.92% 814 11.69%
53 Long Lake 662 10.62% 663 10.47% 664 9.98% 666 9.88% 675 9.70%
54 Maple Plain 104 1.67% 107 1.69% 109 1.64% 112 1.65% 113 1.62%
55 6,235 6,336 6,647 6,744 6,961
56
57 HOUSEHOLDS5 2016
58 Hamel 1,621 74.87% 1,644 75.17% 1,774 76.33% 1,805 76.55% 1,850 76.99%
59 Loretto 278 12.84% 277 12.67% 280 12.05% 281 11.92% 281 11.69%
60 Long Lake 230 10.62% 229 10.47% 232 9.98% 233 9.88% 233 9.70%
61 Maple Plain 36 1.66% 37 1.69% 38 1.64% 39 1.65% 39 1.62%
62 2,165 2,187 2,324 2,358 2,403
63
64 PER CAPITA6 2016
65 Hamel 58$ 20.35% 62$ 22.09% 61$ 22.00% 64$ 22.94% 64$ 23.13%
66 Loretto 128$ 44.70% 126$ 44.96% 124$ 44.67% 117$ 42.07% 111$ 40.19%
67 Long Lake 47$ 16.48% 39$ 14.02% 39$ 14.06% 44$ 15.68% 46$ 16.70%
68 Maple Plain 53$ 18.47% 53$ 18.92% 54$ 19.28% 54$ 19.31% 55$ 19.99%
69 287 279 279 279 276
70
71 BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED 2016
72 # Value # Value # Value # Value # Value
73 Single Family 64 $34,036,649 60 $29,700,500 56 $31,235,936 31 $16,306,708 0 $0
74 Multi Family 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
75 Commercial/Industrial 5 $13,201,640 2 $3,180,250 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
76 69 $47,238,289 62 $32,880,750 56 $31,235,936 31 $16,306,708 0 $0
77
78
MEDINA COST OF LIVING
ADJUSTMENT (COLA)8 2016
79 2.00% 2.00% 3.00% 2.50% 2.50%
80
81
SOCIAL SECURITY COST
OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT
(CPI-W)9 (Sept-Sept)2016
82 0.00% 0.30% 2.20% 2.70% 0.00%
84
85
86 Updated 8/7/19
87
88
4
2017 2018 2019 2020
2017 2018 2019 2020
2017 2018 2019 2020
2020
4 Population is mathematically estimated by district.
5 Households are mathematically estimated by district.
2017 2018 2019 2020
2017 2018 2019 2020
6 “Per Capita” is calculated by dividing contract amount by population. While creating an apparent anomaly in a rural area with a low population (e.g.
the area served by Loretto which is primarily rural), the “Per Capita” metric supplies useful data regarding areas with approximately equal population
density.
7 Medina Annual COLA (determined by comparison with other MN Cities. Information compiled by League of MN Cities).
8 Social Security Annual COLA (determined by Consumer Price Index (CPI-W) Sept. of prior year to Sept. of current year). 1982-1984=100.
2017 2018 2019
Sewer Liftstation/CIP Page 1 of 3 August 20, 2019
Willow Backage Road City Council Worksession
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director; through City Administrator Scott Johnson
DATE: August 15, 2019
MEETING: August 20, 2019 Worksession
SUBJ: Capital Improvement Plan – Willow/Highway 55 Lift Station and
Backage Road
Background
Last month, the City received an application for development from Jar-Har LLP (Adam’s Pest
Control) for property north of Highway 55 and west of Willow Drive.
The potential development presented two improvements which related to the City’s Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP) which staff is seeking direction:
Sewer lift station/forcemain along Willow Drive
Potential backage road from Willow Drive
Sewer Lift Station
The City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan identified the need for a lift station to serve properties to
the west of Willow Drive, including the Adam’s Pest Control site. These sites would not be
serviceable with sanitary sewer via gravity. The improvement is identified as the “Highway 55
Lift Station” and “Highway 55 Gravity Line” at a cost of approximately $700,000 in the table
summarizing the necessary Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvements:
The Comp Plan anticipated that the cost of some of these improvements would be paid by the
City with Sewer Connection Fees charged on all new construction. The Plan also anticipated
that some of these improvements would be expected to be partially or fully constructed by
developers to serve a specific site.
Sewer Liftstation/CIP Page 2 of 3 August 20, 2019
Willow Backage Road City Council Worksession
Staff began internal discussions related to the funding of the lift station on Willow/Highway 55
as soon as development was discussed in this area. A new lift station has not been constructed in
the City for almost 20 years, through two full Comprehensive Plan cycles, so there is not recent
practice to rely upon. The City has generally expected pipes and streets to be constructed in
connection with a particular development. However, other types of improvements, such as water
towers and water treatment plant expansions, are paid for by the City with connection fees from
all new construction.
A regional lift station seems to fall somewhere in between. Unlike a water tower, a lift station
would not “serve” all property in the system. On the other hand, a regional lift station would
serve numerous development sites. It is also worth considering that the need for a lift station
would depend on topography, existing City infrastructure, and how the City plans.
During the analysis, staff reviewed the following information:
Existing balance of the Sewer Capital Fund (approximately $2.8 million)
Projected future sewer connection fee revenue (approximately +$950,000 by 2040)
Anticipated costs of future lift station
The Willow/Highway 55 lift station is the only one anticipated under the current
Comp Plan (although there may be a chance a lift station is necessary for
development along Medina Road/Brockton Lane). However, as staff projected
further into the future, we anticipated 2-3 potential lift stations to serve the Future
Development Area in the longer term (Mohawk Drive/Katrinka Road, west of
Loretto). These future lift stations would only be necessary for additional
development, which would produce connection fees beyond the $950,000
Anticipated portions of other improvements staff anticipated being constructed by
development
Staff projects that the “Upsize Hamel Road” pipe improvement would be fully
funded with connection fees. The other trunk sewers would be anticipated to be
constructed by developers. However, staff recommends reserving additional
funds in case the City decides to fund some portion or provide credits for over-
sizing or over-depth.
Staff’s initial conclusion is that the proper course is to fund regional lift station improvements
with sewer connection fees. If these improvements are not planned to be funded with the
connection fee revenue, it would likely be necessary to lower the connection fees for all
properties and to raise the connection fees significantly for properties which would need a lift
station.
Staff recommends that $700,000 be added to the CIP for the “Willow/Highway 55 Lift Station”
in 2020 and $200,000 be added for the “Hamel Road Sewer Upsizing” in 2025.
Backage Road
The property proposed to be developed by Adam’s Pest Control currently only has frontage on
Highway 55 and does not have access to any other street. Adam’s would prefer to have access to
Willow Drive, but there is property owned by another party between the site and Willow Drive
and no right-of-way exists to allow for it.
Sewer Liftstation/CIP Page 3 of 3 August 20, 2019
Willow Backage Road City Council Worksession
As such, Adam’s is proposing direct access onto Highway 55 via a right-in/right-out. Staff is
coordinating with the City Engineer and MnDOT related to this proposed access, but initial
indications are that a right-in/right-out may actually be more problematic than a full access
because it would likely encourage unsafe U-turn maneuvers at nearby driveways and
intersections.
Adam’s and staff have engaged with the property owner adjacent to Willow Drive to the east to
see if there was a possibility that the property owner would take part in construction of the
backage road. The owner indicated that they would be willing to provide the right-of-way for
construction of the street, but that they would not contribute to the cost.
Adam’s has indicated that they may be willing to construct the roadway, but has requested
financial assistance to do so. The estimated cost of the roadway is $640,000 + additional costs
for stormwater management. Adam’s has also indicted that they would be willing to close their
access onto Highway 55 three years after the backage road is constructed.
Staff also engaged MnDOT to determine if state funding would be available to provide for the
backage road. There are obvious benefits to the regional and state transportation system if access
can be limited and then eliminated onto Highway 55. Unfortunately, MnDOT staff indicated that
there are no readily available funding sources through which they could contribute.
The City has historically expected new roadways to be constructed by the developer of the site
served. The City’s ability to require construction in this case is complicated by the fact that there
is no right-of-way. Staff believes it may be worthwhile for the City to consider collaborating
with the two owners to allow Adam’s to construct the backage road immediately upon
development.
Construction of the backage road immediately with development would reduce the costs of
improvements which Adam’s would need to construct onto Highway 55 and allow that
investment to be shifted to the backage road. It would also reduce the cost of MnDOT closing
the access onto Highway 55 in the future. The City would likely be responsible for some share
of the backage road if it were constructed in the future in order to remove Adam’s access from
Highway 55 (or to extend the backage road to Adam’s if some portion of it is constructed by the
developer adjacent to Willow).
Staff has discussed the possibility of fee reductions rather than a direct contribution towards the
cost of the roadways. These reductions could be provided in various ways to the applicant such
as sewer/water connection fees, building permits fees, engineering inspections, etc. The City
could choose which fund(s) the city would reimburse from which would not necessarily need to
match the fees being reduced, as the City could transfer funds as appropriate.
In initial discussions, staff has considered reductions of sewer connection fees and potential
reductions to other fees to be reimbursed by the road fund, since the reductions support
improvements to the transportation network.
Staff will present more specific information at the worksession.
2020 CIP: DEPARTMENT
Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Potential Revenue Source
Roads
1
Tamarack North of Medina to Blackfoot
Overlay 54,000$ 43,200$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
2 Tamarack - Medina to 24 - Overlay 49,985$ 39,988$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
3 Tamarack City Limits to CSAH 24 Overlay 77,675$ 62,140$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
4 Clydesdale trail overlay 600/101 150,000$ 75,000$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
5 Oakview Road - Overlay 43,000$ 21,500$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
6 Deer Hill Road East - Overlay 27,000$ 23,500$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
7 Dusty Trail - Overlay 4,000$ 2,000$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
8 Tower Dr West Overlay/curb 42,000$ 21,000$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
9 Chestnut Road - Overlay 50,000$ 25,000$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
10 Town Line Rd South 100,000$ 100,000$ Assessment Escrow Fund
11 Foxberry Farms Overlay/10% curb 283,000$ 142,000$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
12 Hackamore Medina/ Portion 600,000$ 450,000$ 600,000$ 450,000$ Reserves/Bonds/Developer
13 Willow Drive North to 24 - reclaim 200,000$ 160,000$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
14 Shire Dr Overlay 32,000$ 16,000$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
15 Iroquois Drive Overlay 30,000$ 15,000$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
16 Maplewood Drive Overlay 29,328$ 14,664$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
17 Bobolink Road Overlay 90,000$ 45,000$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
18 Morningside Road Overlay 110,000$ 55,000$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
19 Elsinore Circle N of Morningside Rd Overlay 20,000$ 10,000$ Reserves/Bonds/Assessments
20 Arrowhead & CR 118 Whistleless Crossing 450,000$ 60,000$ Reserves/State Bonding/Grant
21 Roads Sub-total 555,000$ 122,500$ 1,063,000$ 682,000$ 474,660$ 351,828$ 820,000$ 560,000$ 129,328$ 114,664$
22
23 Public Works
24 Tandem 230,000$ 230,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
25 Water Truck / Tanker Replacement 20,000$ 20,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
26 Air Compressor 25,000$ 25,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
27 Ditch Mower Replacement/Loretto 90,000$ 45,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
28 Backhoe Replacement 130,000$ 130,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
29 Skid Steer Upgrade w/ Bucket/Harly Rake 12,000$ 12,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
30 Single Axle Truck 220,000$ 220,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
31 Public Works Sub-total 167,000$ 167,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 244,000$ 244,000$ 234,000$ 234,000$ 90,000$ 45,000$
32
33 Police
34 PD Squad Cars 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 126,000$ 126,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
35 Traffic Squad 35,000$ 35,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
36 PD Squad Camera / Body Cams 100,000$ 100,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
37 Portable Radios 6,000$ 6,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ DWI Forfeiture Fund/Cap Equip
38 Squad Radios 40,000$ 40,000$ DWI Forfeiture Fund/Cap Equip
39 Records Management 70,000$ 70,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
40 Miscellaneous 8,000$ 8,000$ 8,000$ 8,000$ 8,000$ 8,000$ DWI Forfeiture Fund/Cap Equip
41 Police Sub-total 129,000$ 129,000$ 114,000$ 114,000$ 257,000$ 257,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 134,000$ 134,000$
42
43 Fire
44 HAMEL
45 Ongoing PPE Replacement 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 12,000$ 12,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
46 Command Vehicle Replacement 4,320$ 4,320$ 4,320$ 4,320$ 4,320$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
47 Engine 11 Refurbishment 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
48 Pumper/Tanker 38,917$ 38,917$ 38,917$ 38,917$ 38,917$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
49 Annual Contract 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 77,000$ 77,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
50 Hamel Fire Sub-total 73,237$ 75,000$ 73,237$ 75,000$ 73,237$ 75,000$ 75,237$ 77,000$ 75,237$ 77,000$
51
52 Loretto & Long Lake
53 Fire (Loretto)28,290$ 28,290$ 28,290$ 28,290$ 28,290$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
54 Fire (Long Lake)6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
55 Fire Sub-total -$ 34,290$ -$ 34,290$ -$ 34,290$ -$ 34,290$ -$ 34,290$
56
57 Emergency Management
58 Siren Maintenance 5,000$ 5,000$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
59 Civil Defense Sirens 30,000$ 30,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund
60 Civil Defense Sub-total 5,000$ 5,000$ 37,500$ 37,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$
61
62
63 Administration/Data Processing
64 Vehicle Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
65 Administration Sub-total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
66
67 City Buildings
68 City Hall Repairs/Renovation 15,000$ 15,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund
69 Community Building Repairs 10,000$ 10,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund
70 PW/Police Repairs/Renovations 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund
71 City Buildings - Parking Lot 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund
72 City Building Sub-total 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$
73
74
75
76 Water (high growth expectation)
2020
2020 - 2024 Capital Improvement Plan
2021 2022 2023 2024
1
2020 CIP: DEPARTMENT
Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Potential Revenue Source
2020
2020 - 2024 Capital Improvement Plan
2021 2022 2023 2024
77 Water Treatment Plant Expansion 1,400,000$ 1,400,000$ Future - Water Capital
78
Chippewa Watermain Extension - Arrowhead
to Mohawk 400,000$ 400,000$ Water Capital Improvement
79 Chippewa West of Mohawk 435,000$ 435,000$ Water Capital Improvement
80 Water Tower (and land acquisition)2,600,000$ 2,600,000$ Future Water Cap (2020-2023)
81 Water Sub-total -$ -$ 835,000$ 835,000$ 1,400,000$ 1,400,000$ 2,600,000$ 2,600,000$ -$ -$
82
83 Sewer
84 Willow Dr Lift Station 700,000$ 700,000$ Sewer Capital Fund
I / I Maintenance 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ Sewer Capital Fund
Hunter/Hamel Rd Upsize 750,000$ 750,000$ Sewer Capital Fund
86 Sewer Sub-total -$ -$ 800,000$ 800,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ 750,000$ 750,000$
87
88 Storm Water
89 Long Lake Creek Sub Watershed 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ Storm Water Fund/Grants
90 Storm Water Sub-total -$ 10,000$ -$ 10,000$ -$ 10,000$ -$ 10,000$ -$ 10,000$
91
92 Municipal Park Replacements
93 Trails
97 Annual Trail Replacement 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ Municipal Park Fund
98 Hamel Legion Park
99 Holy Name Park
100 Hunter Lions Park
101 Full Park Reconstruction/Tennis Court 10,000$ 10,000$ 500,000$ 450,000$ Municipal Park Fund/Grants
102 Lakeshore Park
103 Large Playground Equipment 100,000$ 100,000$ Municipal Park Fund
104 Rainwater Nature Area
105 Maple Park
106 Walnut Park
107 Basketball Hoop/Striping 5,000$ 5,000$ Municipal Park Fund
108 Medina Morningside Park
109 Playground curb/rubber under swings 50,000$ 50,000$ Municipal Park Fund
110 Replace baseball backstop 5,000$ 5,000$ Municipal Park Fund
111 Parking Area 10,000$ 10,000$ Municipal Park Fund
112 Medina Lake Preserve
114 Park Clean-up 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ Municipal Park Fund
115 Tomann Preserve - Park Development
116 The Park at Fields of Medina
117 105,000$ 105,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 555,000$ 505,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$
118
119 New Park Development
120 Trails
121 Arrowhead Dr RR Crossing 130,000$ 130,000$ Park Dedication Fund
122 Hackamore Trail 174,000$ 87,000$ 174,000$ 87,000$ Park Ded/Cost Share w/ Corcoran
123 Medina Road Trail 200,000$ 200,000$ Park Dedication Fund
124 Medina Lake Preserve
125 Trail Head 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ Park Dedication Fund
126 Park Land by Medina Golf & CC 500,000$ 500,000$ Park Dedication Fund
127 Land Acquisitions / New Trails 250,000$ 250,000$ Park Dedication Fund
128 Parks Sub-total 130,000$ 130,000$ 374,000$ 287,000$ 750,000$ 750,000$ 199,000$ 112,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$
129
130 TOTAL:1,219,237$ 832,790$ 3,480,737$ 3,058,790$ 3,386,397$ 3,309,618$ 4,625,737$ 4,274,790$ 1,321,065$ 1,307,454$
2