The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About06.16.2020 City Council Meeting Packet Posted 06/12/2020 Page 1 of 1 AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 16, 2020 7:00 P.M. Meeting to be held telephonically/virtually pursuant Minn. Stat. Sec. 13D.021 I. CALL TO ORDER & MOMENT OF SILENCE II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of the June 2, 2020 Regular Council Meeting V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve COVID-19 Preparedness Plan for City of Medina B. Approve WSB Proposal for Design Work at Hunter Lions Park C. Resolution Granting Preliminary Approval to the Estate of Robert Roehl for the Roehl Heights Plat VI. COMMENTS A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda B. Park Commission C. Planning Commission VII. NEW BUSINESS A. OSI – Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park 3rd Addition – Final Plat 1. Resolution Granting Final Approval of the Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Third Addition Plat B. Hackamore Road Improvement Project VIII. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT IX. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS X. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS XI. CLOSED SESSION: POLICE UNION CONTRACT Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 13D.03 XII. ADJOURN Telephonic/Virtual Meeting Call-in Instructions Join via Microsoft Teams to view presentations at this link: https://medinamn.us/council/ For audio only: Dial 1-612-517-3122 Enter Conference ID: 875 471 014# MEMORANDUM TO: Medina City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: June 11, 2020 DATE OF MEETING: June 16, 2020 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report Telephonic/Virtual Meeting Call-in Instructions Join via Microsoft Teams to view presentations at this link: https://medinamn.us/council/ For audio only: Dial 1-612-517-3122; Enter Conference ID: 875 471 014# I. CALL TO ORDER & MOMENT OF SILENCE V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve COVID-19 Preparedness Plan for City of Medina – The Governor’s order 20-74 requires critical businesses (which includes cities) to have a COVID-19 Preparedness Plan implemented by June 29th. Department heads have reviewed this plan and staff recommends approval. See attached plan. B. Approve WSB Proposal for Design Work at Hunter Lions Park – A 2020 Goal of the Medina Park Commission is to work with a landscape architect to develop a master plan for Hunter Lions Park. The 2020 CIP has allocated up to $20,000 from Municipal Park Funds to complete this work. The WSB Proposal came in under budget with a not-to- exceed cost of $12,000. Staff recommends approval. See attached proposal. C. Resolution Granting Preliminary Approval to the Estate of Robert Roehl for the Roehl Heights Plat – City Council reviewed this request at the June 2nd meeting and directed staff to prepare the enclosed resolution granting preliminary approval. Staff recommends approval. See attached resolution. VII. NEW BUSINESS A. OSI – Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park 3rd Addition – Final Plat – On March 17, 2020, the City Council adopted resolution 2020-15, granting preliminary approval to Arrowhead Holdings (entity related to OSI which holds real estate) for the platting of property at 4101 Arrowhead Drive and the property adjacent to the north. The subject property is located 2 west of Arrowhead Drive and north of Highway 55. The plat incorporates some of the vacant outlot to the north into the 4101 Arrowhead Drive lot to allow for parking necessary to support an addition to the existing building. The City Council also adopted various other approvals related to the building addition on the same night and approved of a development agreement related to the project. The owner has now requested final approval of the plat and submitted final plans for construction. See attached report. Recommended Motion: Adopt resolution granting final approval of the Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Third Addition Plat B. Hackamore Road Improvement Project – On February 18, 2020, the City Council authorized WSB to procced with design work for the Hackamore Road Improvement Project to a 30% completion level. The project generally extends from just west of County Road 116 (Medina Lake Drive) to just east of County Road 101 and was initiated jointly by the City of Corcoran and the City of Medina. The purpose of the project is to address deteriorating and insufficient infrastructure, to develop a cohesive plan that both cities can use to guide transportation needs, right-of-way, and pedestrian mobility along the corridor. The intention is to prepare a plan for the entire corridor to 75% completion, with the expectation that a series of projects will likely be completed over time to finalize the improvements. Completing the preliminary design work will allow both cities to require adequate right-of-way at the time of adjacent development and to determine what improvements are necessary at each intersection to allow the cities to require the construction of improvements which serve adjacent development at the time of development. The City Council will begin discussing this project during the 6 p.m. work session with any action being taken during the regular meeting. See attached memo. Recommended Motion: Motion to direct staff to proceed with design of the Hackamore Road Improvement project to a 75% level based upon Option 2. X. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 005541E-005559E for $116,252.49 and order check numbers 050296-050345 for $237,367.48, payroll EFT 0510287-0510319 for $56,441.07. INFORMATION PACKET:  Planning Department Update  Police Department Update  Public Works Department Update  Claims List Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1 June 2, 2020 DRAFT 1 2 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 2, 2020 3 4 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on June 2, 2020 at 7:00 5 p.m. virtually. Mayor Martin presided. 6 7 Mayor Martin issued a statement that all meetings of the City Council and other Boards 8 and Commissions continue to occur in a virtual format because of the COVID-19 9 pandemic and related local and State declarations of emergency. She provided 10 information on how members of the public can participate in the meeting. 11 12 I. ROLL CALL 13 14 Members present: Albers, Anderson, DesLauriers, Martin, and Pederson. 15 16 Members absent: None. 17 18 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, Assistant City Administrator Jodi 19 Gallup, City Attorney Dave Anderson, Finance Director Erin Barnhart, City Engineer Jim 20 Stremel, City Planning Director Dusty Finke, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, and 21 Chief of Police Jason Nelson. 22 23 Martin commented that this has been a challenging year with COVID-19 and now the 24 horrific death of a Minneapolis resident. She stated that Medina has been extremely 25 blessed by a competent and compassionate Police Department. She commented that 26 Ed Belland recently retired and new Police Chief Jason Nelson has stepped into the role 27 during a very difficult time and commended Nelson and his staff for the extraordinary 28 effort they have put forth. She stated that Nelson wrote a very endearing thoughts and 29 reflections memorandum to his department on his first few months as Chief and read 30 aloud an excerpt from the memo. 31 32 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:13 p.m.) 33 34 III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:14 p.m.) 35 The agenda was approved as presented. 36 37 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:14 p.m.) 38 39 A. Approval of the May 19, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 40 Martin noted that comments provided by herself and Anderson were distributed for 41 incorporation into the minutes prior to the meeting. 42 43 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to approve the May 19, 2020 regular City 44 Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 45 46 V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:15 p.m.) 47 48 A. Approve 2020-2021 Liquor License Renewals 49 Moved by Pederson, seconded by Martin, to approve the consent agenda. Motion 50 passed unanimously. 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2 June 2, 2020 1 VI. COMMENTS (7:17 p.m.) 2 3 A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 4 There were none. 5 6 B. Park Commission 7 Park Commissioner Sharp reported that the Park Commission met recently and 8 reviewed the Roehl subdivision request, recommending cash in lieu of land. He stated 9 that the Commission is also working to provide an updated parks inventory. He reported 10 that the Hamel Athletic Club will begin its season tonight, in a modified manor to meet 11 the requirements of the Governor’s Order. 12 13 C. Planning Commission 14 Finke reported that the Commission will meet the following week to hold a public hearing 15 to consider an ordinance amendment related to building materials within commercial 16 districts, which would add engineered wood as an allowed material when rehabilitating 17 buildings. 18 19 Martin asked the process that will be used to fill the position left vacant by Amic. 20 21 Finke stated that applications are being accepted through June 18th and the 22 subcommittee will make a recommendation to the Council in early July. 23 24 Anderson asked the remaining length of the vacant term. 25 26 Finke stated that he was unsure but believed that the term ran through the remainder of 27 the year. 28 29 Gallup stated that the advertisement states that the position runs through the end of the 30 year and that the Commissioner could request reappointment for an additional three-31 year term. 32 33 Resident Stacy Ladwig stated that she noticed on the application that there is a 34 requirement for residents to live in Medina for a minimum of two years. She asked if 35 there are any circumstances in which that requirement is waived, noting that she has 36 lived in Medina for 18 months. 37 38 Martin stated that the Council recently relaxed the requirement from three years to two 39 years, in an attempt to open the position to more people. She encouraged the resident 40 to apply for interested positions once the two-year requirement is met. 41 42 Albers stated that perhaps it would make sense to review applicants that may not meet 43 the two-year requirement because this is more of an interim appointment for the 44 remainder of this term and noted that this resident would appear to be eligible at the end 45 of the year. 46 47 Martin commented that this appointment would occur immediately because of the vacant 48 position. She encouraged the resident to apply, stating that the resident could include 49 the date they moved into Medina. 50 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3 June 2, 2020 Finke stated that the two-year requirement is written into the ordinance and therefore if 1 the Council wants to discuss that option, an ordinance amendment would need to occur 2 prior to the appointment. 3 4 Pederson commented that the Council recently denied an applicant because they did not 5 meet the residency requirement and therefore did not see it fair to change it at this point. 6 7 DesLauriers agreed that the requirement was relaxed from three years to two years and 8 did not think it would be fair to consider an applicant that did not meet the requirement 9 when others have been denied. 10 11 Albers stated that guidance should be provided by the number of applications received 12 and the appointment date. He stated that it would be nice to have flexibility, depending 13 upon the situation. 14 15 VII. NEW BUSINESS 16 17 A. Roehl Estate – Preliminary Plat – 1735 Medina Road (7:31 p.m.) 18 Finke presented a request for a subdivision of the property at 1735 Medina Road, noting 19 that the preliminary plat would divide the lot into two lots which both exceed the 20 minimum lot standards. He stated that staff would not recommend construction traffic for 21 the northern lot use Morgan Road, noting that access would need to be provided by 22 Medina Road. He stated that there would be no proposed wetland impacts. He stated 23 that staff recommends that the implementation of the wetland boundaries on the 24 northern lot hold off until construction would be completed. He stated that the Park 25 Commission recommends cash in lieu for park dedication. 26 27 Moved by Anderson, seconded by DesLauriers, to direct staff to prepare resolution to 28 approve the preliminary plat for the Roehl subdivision with the conditions outlined in the 29 staff report. 30 31 A roll call vote was performed: 32 33 Pederson aye 34 Anderson aye 35 DesLauriers aye 36 Albers aye 37 Martin aye 38 39 Motion passed unanimously. 40 41 B. Ordinance Amending Regulations Pertaining to Accessory Structures; 42 Amending Chapter 8 of the City Code (7:36 p.m.) 43 Finke stated that the proposed amendment would increase the allowed size of sheds 44 that are allowed as exemptions to the full structure setback. He stated that currently the 45 size is 120 square feet in Medina and the amendment would increase that size to 200 46 square feet. He stated that the Planning Commission discussed adding a height 47 limitation for the structures allowed exempt from the full setback and recommended a 48 height limitation. He referenced the current requirement that requires a rural residential 49 property to request a CUP for accessory structures over 5,000 square feet. He noted 50 that process adds cost and length to the project, and typically little or no feedback is 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4 June 2, 2020 provided during the process. He noted that the Planning Commission recommended 1 leaving that requirement in place. He stated that the Planning Commission unanimously 2 recommended approval of the ordinance amendment as proposed. 3 4 Pederson asked if the façade is required to match the home. 5 6 Finke replied that the ordinance includes general language about complimenting the 7 principle structure on the property for any accessory structure, noting that is fairly 8 subjective language. He stated that structures over 5,000 square feet have more explicit 9 architectural details. He stated that the ordinance amendment as proposed would not 10 change the requirements in terms of architecture for any sheds or outbuildings. 11 12 DesLauriers stated that he supports the four measures as identified by staff including the 13 height limitation. 14 15 Albers confirmed his consensus of the recommendation of the Planning Commission. 16 17 Martin stated that she is a little concerned with the size of the sheds, noting that on 18 some of the smaller lots it could be obtrusive to have a structure of that size in that 19 proximity to the property line. She stated that she also recognizes that many of the 20 neighborhoods have HOA’s which have their own covenants that would protect against 21 those measures. She stated that her concern would be that the City is permitting these 22 types of structures that close to the neighbor’s property line. She recognized that there 23 were no public comments at the public hearing held by the Planning Commission. She 24 noted that she would be willing to support the recommendation of the Commission if the 25 other Council members support the action as well. 26 27 Albers stated that Martin makes a persuasive argument to not approving the 28 amendment. He asked if the language related to the structure being compatible to the 29 principle structure should be strengthened. 30 31 Martin provided some grammatical suggestions that could be added to strengthen the 32 language but noted that those elements could make it cost prohibitive to have these 33 structures. She stated that she is in the rural area of Medina and would still not want to 34 see a prefabricated shed on her neighbor’s property. 35 36 DesLauriers stated that he would rather have the items stored in a shed rather than 37 outdoors. He noted that some garage sizes are smaller, and residents need additional 38 storage space. 39 40 Martin stated that a shed of this size could store a snowmobile or boat and believes that 41 residents should pay for offsite storage of those items if needed. She read aloud 42 language from the staff report related to small residential lots and asked if she 43 interpreted the language correct to allow an outbuilding of up to 1,000 square feet in 44 addition to the small shed being discussed tonight. 45 46 Finke confirmed that language to be true but noted that it would be unlikely that the 47 smallest lots in Medina could accommodate an accessory structure of any size because 48 of the required setbacks, which was the reason the exempt allowance came about. He 49 explained that the exemption allows the smaller lots to have a small shed. He stated 50 that the Council could still make the change from 120 square feet to 200 square feet for 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5 June 2, 2020 exempt sheds, without changing the size of the shed allowed as additional to the 1 accessory structure language. 2 3 Martin stated that she would support this item going back to the Planning Commission 4 for additional discussion. 5 6 Pederson stated that the points brought forward by Martin are valid, noting that he would 7 not want to see the sheds destroying the views of others. 8 9 Albers and DesLauriers agreed that this should go back to the Planning Commission. 10 11 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Martin, to direct the Planning Commission to again 12 review the proposed ordinance amending regulations pertaining to accessory structures 13 as discussed by the Council. 14 15 Further discussion: Martin suggested that the City Attorney provide a memorandum to 16 the Planning Commission related to the expiration of HOA covenants after 30 years. 17 18 A roll call vote was performed: 19 20 Pederson aye 21 Anderson aye 22 DesLauriers aye 23 Albers aye 24 Martin aye 25 26 Motion passed unanimously. 27 28 C. Police Officer Recruitment Discussion (8:00 p.m.) 29 Nelson stated that in 2019 Belland did some forward thinking related to hiring in advance 30 of his retirement to prevent a shortage of personnel. He stated that an additional officer 31 was also requested and was approved through the budget process. He stated that the 32 application process took place for the backfilling that was necessary and the necessary 33 background checks in February 2020. He stated that one officer was hired as a result of 34 the process. He stated that staff discussed looking at an internal candidate for the 35 additional position, looking at the CSO positions. He stated that the internal application 36 process began, and he is asking the Council for authorization to complete the 37 background check process for the two internal applicants. He stated that currently there 38 are officers that have been unable to use vacation time because of the small size of the 39 department and related challenges with COVID-19. He stated that he has worked with 40 administration and finance staff and a decision was made to allow 200 vacation hours to 41 carry over from 2020 to 2021, because all vacations have been denied in the past three 42 months. 43 44 Moved by Anderson, seconded by DesLauriers, to authorize staff to continue the internal 45 recruitment to fill Police Officer position. 46 47 A roll call vote was performed: 48 49 Pederson aye 50 Anderson aye 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 6 June 2, 2020 DesLauriers aye 1 Albers aye 2 Martin aye 3 4 Motion passed unanimously. 5 6 D. Administrative Assistant to Planning and Public Works Recruitment 7 Discussion (8:07 p.m.) 8 9 1. Resolution No. 2020-31 Accepting Resignation of 10 Administrative Assistant Katrina Jones 11 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 2020-31 Accepting 12 the Resignation of Administrative Assistant Katrina Jones. Motion passed 13 unanimously. 14 15 Johnson noted that Katrina Jones received a higher-level position with the City of Crystal 16 and wishes her the best in her change of employment. 17 18 Gallup stated that her memorandum identified the primary job duties and other key roles 19 for the position. She stated that minor changes were made to the description to clarify 20 the other roles of the position, which were identified in the redline version. 21 22 Martin stated that she has found that in her personal situation with her private office 23 staff, there have been less administrative needs during this process and efficiencies 24 have been identified. She stated that she has been challenged to keep her private staff 25 busy and asked if there has been a similar feel at City Hall. 26 27 Johnson replied that he spoke with Finke and Scherer and noted that the permit 28 requests continue at a high level and there have been more calls and activity for public 29 works. 30 31 Scherer stated that the position also assists with DNR reporting for water and sewer, 32 coding of the bills, and answers phones. He noted that Katrina had been on maternity 33 leave since February and it has been a struggle to continue to ask other departments for 34 assistance with these duties. He stated that if the process for recruitment began today, 35 it would still be some time before someone came on board. He noted that he has a new 36 foreman in public works, and he is currently down two people. He stated that public 37 works continues to receive inbound calls constantly during this time. He stated that he 38 backed off on filling a public works position last fall and is currently running two people 39 under budget. He stated that he feels strongly that this position needs to be filled. 40 41 Finke echoed the comments of staff that planning traffic has been just as high. He noted 42 that this position handles the over the counter permits that are issued which allows the 43 other staff to focus on their duties. He encouraged the Council to authorize the 44 recruitment as it will still take time to bring that person on board. 45 46 Albers stated that it is an interesting time to recruit for candidates, noting that the pool 47 has been increased by those unemployed. He believed that it would be a good time to 48 move forward on recruitment for this position. He recognized while it may be challenging 49 to keep administrative assistant staff busy during this time in the private sector, it 50 appears that there is a demand at City Hall. 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 7 June 2, 2020 1 Martin agreed that is seems beneficial to move forward and proceed with the actions 2 proposed. 3 4 Moved by Anderson, seconded by DesLauriers, to approve Administrative Assistant Job 5 Description. Motion passed unanimously. 6 7 Moved by Anderson, seconded by DesLauriers, to authorize staff to begin recruitment to 8 fill the vacant Administrative Assistant position. 9 10 A roll call vote was performed: 11 12 Pederson aye 13 Anderson aye 14 DesLauriers aye 15 Albers aye 16 Martin aye 17 18 Motion passed unanimously. 19 20 E. Regulatory Flexibility Discussion for Businesses (8:20 p.m.) 21 Martin provided background information on the previous suggestion that staff look into 22 what the City could do to provide flexibility to businesses allowed to open under the new 23 restrictions. 24 25 Johnson provided additional information on recent orders from the Governor related to 26 the partial reopening of certain businesses (restaurants, bars, salons). He noted that 27 communication was sent to those businesses advising of the flexibility available. He 28 stated that Batty drafted a memorandum and recommendation for the Council to 29 consider that would allow staff to continue to apply that flexibility. 30 31 Albers applauded the staff and thanked them for the work they have done. He 32 commented that hopefully the restaurants and bars were able to see that the City is 33 willing to work with them to help them reopen and serve the public. He stated that 34 hopefully people can begin to return to normal life and support these businesses. 35 36 Moved by Albers, seconded by DesLauriers, to authorize City staff to apply City rules 37 and regulations regarding restaurants and bars with flexibility to facilitate the partial 38 reopening of those businesses starting June 1, 2020, while maintaining public health and 39 safety and compliance with State laws and regulations. 40 41 A roll call vote was performed: 42 43 Pederson aye 44 Anderson aye 45 DesLauriers aye 46 Albers aye 47 Martin aye 48 49 Motion passed unanimously. 50 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 8 June 2, 2020 VIII. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT 1 2 A. 2020 Election Update (8:25 p.m.) 3 Gallup provided an update on a new law signed by the Governor on May 12th to address 4 absentee polling and polling locations related to COVID-19 and reviewed the changes 5 that were made through the law. She stated that she has had communication with 6 previous Election Judges that are not interested this year because of COVID-19. She 7 stated that she has begun recruitment for those positions. She noted that polling 8 locations can be changed and asked for input on whether the City would like to allow in 9 person absentee voting at City Hall for the primary or allow the County to handle that 10 activity. She noted that in person absentee voting historically has a low turnout at City 11 Hall and would recommend allowing that to continue at City Hall. 12 13 Martin thanked Gallup for her continued excellent work. She stated that perhaps both 14 precincts are not needed to be open for the primary but noted that it would be nice to 15 have one location available in Medina. 16 17 Albers expressed appreciation for the process Gallup went through to outline the 18 options. He also commented that one location should be made available in Medina. 19 20 Anderson agreed that the more polling locations Medina can offer its residents, the 21 better the City would be. 22 23 Gallup stated that Medina can combine its polling places, if needed, due to COVID-19. 24 She stated that the problem would be that any combined location would need to be 25 within the precinct or within one mile of the precinct, therefore Medina does not have a 26 location that large to support the activity. She noted that one option would be to allow 27 polling at the Hamel Community Building and not at City Hall. 28 29 Anderson stated that he is strongly in favor of keeping both locations open. 30 31 Gallup agreed that it would be difficult to communicate to all the residents that the 32 location has changed. 33 34 DesLauriers agreed that it would be better to disburse residents between two locations. 35 36 Gallup stated that staff will push hard to recruit additional Election Judges to support two 37 locations. She noted that affidavits of candidates can now be done electronically and 38 provided details on how the City will allow that option. She noted that in person 39 candidate filing can still occur. 40 41 It was the consensus of the Council to continue with two polling locations within Medina. 42 43 B. Update from Police Chief (8:37 p.m.) 44 Johnson commented on the great job that Nelson and his team have done with COVID-45 19 and the recent civil unrest. 46 47 Nelson thanked City staff and the Council for their support and for the support from the 48 community. He stated that these are trying times and it is nice to be a part of the 49 community with mutual love and respect. He stated that COVID-19 has been quiet in 50 recent time, but the department continues to monitor situations and exposures. He 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 9 June 2, 2020 reported that the police department has been back to its regular schedule for one week. 1 He stated that planning and preparing continues related to COVID-19 as the department 2 continues to gather PPE supplies to meet its 30-day stock of supplies. He stated that it 3 is nice to see people resuming some normal activity with the partial reopening of some 4 businesses. He stated that the death of George Floyd at the hands of the police has 5 sparked outrage locally and globally. He stated that there have been both peaceful and 6 violent protests. He stated that these are unprecedented times with the civil unrest and 7 the local, state and National Guard resources being used. He stated that the Medina 8 police department added extra patrols and has worked with community leaders and 9 businesses during this time, along with the Lakes Area Management Group to provide a 10 coordinated plan. He stated that fortunately there have been very few issues compared 11 to the first ring suburbs. He noted that there have been protests scheduled for 12 neighboring communities. He stated that social media has been spreading fear and 13 misinformation and noted that the police department can attempt to vet any concerns. 14 15 Pederson thanked Nelson for his update and for the work his department is doing to 16 keep everyone in the community safe. 17 18 IX. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (8:46 p.m.) 19 Albers thanked Nelson for the update and echoed the comments of Pederson with 20 thanks to Nelson and the whole force for the work they have done in recent months. 21 22 Martin stated that members of the Council and staff attended a meeting of the Hamel 23 Fire Department Advisory Board to review the preliminary budget numbers, expressing a 24 need to suppress increases to the budget to the degree necessary. She recognized that 25 there are some costs which are out of their control (insurance) and additional PPE are 26 needed during this time. 27 28 X. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (8:48 p.m.) 29 Moved by Anderson, seconded by DesLauriers, to approve the bills, EFT 005528E-30 005540E for $49,191.15, order check numbers 050251-050295 for $172,757.40, and 31 payroll EFT 0510259-0510286 for $51,885.70. 32 33 A roll call vote was performed: 34 35 Pederson aye 36 Anderson aye 37 DesLauriers aye 38 Albers aye 39 Martin aye 40 41 Motion passed unanimously. 42 43 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 10 June 2, 2020 XI. ADJOURN 1 Martin commented that she misses seeing everyone and hopes everyone remains well. 2 3 Moved by Anderson, seconded by DesLauriers, to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 p.m. 4 5 A roll call vote was performed: 6 7 Pederson aye 8 Anderson aye 9 DesLauriers aye 10 Albers aye 11 Martin aye 12 13 Motion passed unanimously. 14 15 16 __________________________________ 17 Kathy Martin, Mayor 18 Attest: 19 20 ____________________________________ 21 Scott Johnson, City Administrator 22 COVID-19 Preparedness Plan for City of Medina Note: This plan addresses workplace issues when there is limited customer contact. Updates or a new plan will be needed when customer interactions resume. The City of Medina is committed to providing a safe and healthy workplace for all our employees. To ensure that, we have developed the following Preparedness Plan in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Managers and employees are all responsible for implementing this plan. Our goal is to mitigate the potential for transmission of COVID-19 in our workplaces, and that requires full cooperation among employees and management. Only through this cooperative effort can we establish and maintain the safety and health of our employees and workplaces. Management and employees are responsible for implementing and complying with all aspects of this Preparedness Plan. Managers and supervisors have our full support in enforcing the provisions of this policy. Our employees are our most important assets. We are serious about safety and health and keeping our employees working. Employee involvement is essential in developing and implementing a successful COVID-19 Preparedness Plan. We have involved our employees in this process by responding to concerns raised by staff and sharing decisions with employees via email and supervisor updates. Employees are encouraged to continue to report any suggestions or concerns they have related to being at work and COVID-19. Our Preparedness Plan follows Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) guidelines and federal OSHA standards related to COVID-19 and addresses: • hygiene and respiratory etiquette; • engineering and administrative controls for social distancing; • housekeeping – cleaning, disinfecting and decontamination; • prompt identification and isolation of sick persons; • communications and training that will be provided to managers and employees; and management and supervision necessary to ensure effective implementation of the plan. Agenda Item # 5A 2 Screening and policies for employees exhibiting signs and symptoms of COVID-19 Employees have been informed of and encouraged to self-monitor for signs and symptoms of COVID-19. The following policies and procedures are being implemented to assess employees’ health status prior to entering the workplace and for employees to report when they are sick or experiencing symptoms. • Employees are expected to assess their health condition prior to leaving their home for work EACH DAY and before taking any temperature reducing drug. This includes self-assessment for COVID-19 symptoms, exposure to others with COVID-19 symptoms/illness, and exposure from travel. Attached is the health screening questionnaire an employee should review each day before coming to work. See Appendix A for the Health Screening Questionnaire. • If an employee answers yes to any of the questions on the health screening, they are to report to their supervisor and human resources that they cannot report to work. If the employee believes there are extenuating circumstances that would allow them to report to work (for example, the employee has already had COVID-19, recovered, and considered unable to be a carrier of the virus) the supervisor and human resources will assess whether the employee can report to work. Employees may qualify for Families First Act financial benefits and human resources will assist employees with applying for those benefits via email. • If symptoms appear during the work day, an employee should immediately notify their supervisor and human resources that they must leave work. Employees may qualify for Families First Act financial benefits and human resources will assist employees with applying for those benefits via email. • If an employee cannot immediately leave work, for example someone gave them a ride to work, they should gather their things and self-isolate until they can leave. Employees should take the nearest exit from their workstations and walk outside the building. This will reduce contact and contamination as much as possible of other employees and office areas. The employee should avoid touching any unnecessary surfaces, chairs, handles, or other items while waiting in the room. Employees who are self-isolating must notify human resources immediately so the room can be disinfected before being used again. • It’s okay to stay home if an employee is exhibiting symptoms of COVID-19, and this should be encouraged to prevent the spread of COVID-19 to other employees. The City of Medina has implemented leave policies that promote employees staying at home when they are sick, when household members are sick, or when required by a health care provider to isolate or quarantine themselves or a member of their household. These policies 3 include Annual Leave, floating holiday, Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and unpaid leave of absence. In addition, the federal government has passed the Families First Act which may provide full or partial wages depending on the reason for the leave and employee eligibility. Accommodations for office employees with underlying medical conditions or who have household members with underlying health conditions have been implemented. They may work remotely/telework as long as work is available. In some cases they may report to work but work in a closed office/room with a door to isolate themselves from other employees. They may also work flexible hours with the permission of their supervisor to reduce contact with other staff. The City of Medina has also implemented a policy for informing employees if they have been exposed to a person with COVID-19 at their workplace and requiring them to quarantine for the required amount of time. Supervisors will notify only those affected coworkers if they have been exposed to COVID-19. A discussion will take place as to whether social distancing has been followed which would reduce or may eliminate the likelihood of a true exposure. If social distancing and other hygiene etiquette has not been followed, then the exposed employees will be required to self-quarantine for 14 days. In addition, a policy has been implemented to protect the privacy of employees’ health status and health information. Several laws address the privacy of medical information. To assure compliance with these laws, and to respect employee privacy, supervisors MAY NOT reveal the name of the person who has reported COVID-19 symptoms or tested positive/negative with coworkers. Supervisors may share the employee name only with those who absolutely need to know. If an employee would like others to be made aware of their situation, they should ask a coworker to share the information and not a supervisor or manager. Supervisors and managers should not share this information under any circumstances, even if it is widely known among a work group(s). Handwashing Basic infection prevention measures are being implemented at our workplaces at all times. Employees are instructed to wash their hands for at least 20 seconds with soap and water frequently throughout the day, but especially at the beginning and end of their shift, prior to any mealtimes and after using the bathroom. All visitors to the facility will be required to wash their hands prior to or immediately upon entering the facility. Some buildings have hand- sanitizer dispensers (that use sanitizers of greater than 60% alcohol) that can be used for hand hygiene in place of soap and water, as long as hands are not visibly soiled. Employees should avoid touching their eyes, nose, and mouth with unwashed hands. 4 Restrooms are readily available in City buildings. Restrooms are frequently cleaned and sanitized. Employees may leave their work stations at any time to wash their hands. Spray sanitizer, towels, and hand sanitizer are also available in office areas and work rooms. Employees working from City vehicles are provided with sanitizing wipes in their vehicles to use as needed and between inspection appointments. When more sanitizing wipes/hand sanitizer is needed, employees should email a work order request to Assistant City Administrator Jodi Gallup. Respiratory etiquette: Cover your cough or sneeze; Face masks Employees and visitors are being instructed to cover their mouth and nose with their sleeve or a tissue when coughing or sneezing and to avoid touching their face, in particular their mouth, nose and eyes, with their hands. They should dispose of tissues in the trash and wash or sanitize their hands immediately afterward. Respiratory etiquette will be demonstrated on posters and supported by making tissues and trash receptacles available to all employees and visitors. Employees will be reminded of this through this Plan as well as through email, supervisor updates to staff and posters. See Appendix B for the Face Mask Policy. Social distancing Social distancing is being implemented in the workplace through the following engineering and administrative controls: The City has implemented the following to allow for social distancing: • Teleworking and remote computer access • Use of remote meeting technology while at work • Adjusting shifts o Flexible shifts o Split shifts o Staggered shifts o Reduced hours • Assigning employees to facilities, teams, or vehicles • Allowing employees to take city vehicles home overnight We have instructed employees to maintain six feet of social distancing. We have also provided masks and/or gloves to employees who come into contact with the public or whose work brings them in contact with items that may be contaminated such as facial tissues in trash bins. 5 Employees and visitors are prohibited from gathering in groups and confined areas, including elevators and vestibules, and from using other employees’ personal protective equipment, phones, computer equipment, desks, cubicles, workstations, offices or other personal work tools and equipment. Employees entering or exiting rooms such as conference rooms, work rooms, office entry doors, etc. should stand back and maintain a six foot distance for anyone who is already in the room or attempting to exit/enter. Housekeeping Regular housekeeping practices are being implemented, including routine cleaning and disinfecting of work surfaces, equipment, tools and machinery, and areas in the work environment, including restrooms, break rooms, lunch rooms and meeting rooms. Frequent cleaning and disinfecting will be conducted in high-touch areas, such as phones, keyboards, touch screens, controls, door handles, elevator panels, railings, copy machines, etc. • Employees are expected to wipe common surfaces such as copier/postage machine touch pads, light switches, handles, etc. before and after use. • Employees are also expected to wipe/disinfect their personal work areas at least once each day. This includes phone, key board, mouse, mouse pad, light switch, door knobs, etc. • Employees using vehicles are expected to wipe/disinfect door handles (inside/outside, steering wheel, seat, gear shift, radio/climate control/other knobs, glove box entry, etc.) • Employees should avoid using other employees’ phones, desks, offices, or other work tools and equipment, when possible. If necessary, clean and disinfect them before and after use. At all city facilities, employees are responsible for wiping and disinfecting as they come into the building and as they use vehicles, equipment and the lunchroom facilities. Communications and training This Preparedness Plan was communicated via postings in the work place, emailed to employees, and shared by supervisors to those without email during the week of [date] _______ and necessary training was provided. Additional communication and training will be ongoing via email and supervisor updates to staff and provided to all employees who did not receive the initial training. Posters addressing proper hand washing, health screening, everyday reminders and how COVID-19 spreads are placed throughout the buildings. Managers and supervisors are to monitor how effective the program has been implemented by requesting feedback and concerns from employees as well as personal observation. 6 Management and employees are to work through this new program together and update the training as necessary. This Preparedness Plan has been certified by City of Medina management and was posted throughout the workplace [date] _____________. It will be updated as necessary. Certified by: _______________________________________________ Scott Johnson City Administrator 7 Appendix C – Guidance for developing a COVID-19 Preparedness Plan General www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nCoV www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus www.osha.gov www.dli.mn.gov Handwashing www.cdc.gov/handwashing/when-how-handwashing.html www.cdc.gov/handwashing https://youtu.be/d914EnpU4Fo Respiratory etiquette: Cover your cough or sneeze www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/prevention.html www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/prevention.html www.cdc.gov/healthywater/hygiene/etiquette/coughing_sneezing.html Social distancing www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/guidance-business-response.html www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/businesses.html Housekeeping www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/disinfecting-building-facility.html www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/disinfecting-your-home.html www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/list-n-disinfectants-use-against-sars-cov-2 www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/organizations/cleaning-disinfection.html Employees exhibiting signs and symptoms of COVID-19 www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/if-you-are-sick/steps-when-sick.html www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/basics.html Training www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/about.pdf www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/guidance-small-business.html www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3990.pdf Health Screening Questionnaire for City Hall Employees and Visitors The safety of our employees, their families and our citizens is Medina’s highest priority. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and state/local health authorities have acknowledged community spread of COVID-19 and issued attendant precautions. To reduce the potential risk of exposure to our workforce and city hall visitors, we are conducting a simple screening questionnaire. Your participation is important to help us protect you and everyone in this building. Thank you for your time and participation. Date: Employee or Visitor’s Name: Phone number: (mobile/home) Visitor’s Company/Organization: Self- Declaration by Employee or Visitor Please check yes or no for questions 1-5 1 Do you currently have symptoms that may be due to COVID-19, particularly: • A fever, or a sense of having a fever? Note: If a person’s body temperature is at or above 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit, the individual may not be admitted to City Hall. • A new cough that you cannot attribute to another health condition? • New shortness of breath that you cannot attribute to another health condition? • A new sore throat that you cannot attribute to another health condition? • New muscle aches that you cannot attribute to another health condition or that that may have been caused by a specific activity (such as physical exercise)? • Fatigue that you cannot attribute to another health condition? • Chills, and or repeated shaking with chills, that you cannot attribute to another health condition? • A new loss of taste or smell that you cannot attribute to another health condition? No Yes Reference Sources: CDC: COVID-19 Symptoms DEED FAQs on safely returning to work 2 Have you been in close contact with someone diagnosed with COVID- 19 either within 72 hours before their symptoms started, within 7 days after their symptoms began, or within 3 days after their symptoms ended? Yes No Unknown Reference Source: CDC: If you are sick 3 Have you attended any events larger than 10 people within the last 14 days? Yes No Reference Source: On March 16, 2020, President Donald Trump issued guidelines to limit gatherings of more than 10 people. White House Corona Guidance 4 Have you traveled internationally in the last 14 days? Yes No Reference Source: CDC: Travelers 5 Have you been in close contact with someone who has traveled internationally within the last 14 days and is now sick with any of the symptoms listed in Question 1? Yes No Reference Source: CDC: Travelers and Cruises If the answer is “yes” to any of the questions, access to the facility will be denied. The city will make alternate arrangements to provide services to individuals denied access pursuant to this questionnaire. Please refer to the League’s City Employment Issue During COVID-19 Pandemic FAQs for additional resource information. The employee should work with their supervisor to discuss potential accommodations, such as working from home. An employee sent home with a fever can return to work when:  Individual has had no fever for at least three days without taking medication to reduce fever during that time; AND  Any respiratory symptoms (cough and shortness of breath) have improved for at least three days; AND  At least seven days have passed since symptoms began. Reference resource: CDC: If you are sick An employee may return to work earlier if a doctor confirms the cause of the employee's fever or other symptoms is not COVID-19 and provides a written release for the employee to return to work. ================================================================== I agree to abide by City of Medina’s rules and procedures regarding social distancing, handwashing, and face covering as well as any additionally required PPE during the time I am in this workplace. Signature (visitor/employee): ______________________________________ Date: ________________ Pursuant to the Minnesota’s Government Data Practices Act as well as the Americans with Disabilities Act, the content of this form is non-public data and only to be shared with those working for the city where their position reasonably requires access. Face Mask Policy for Medina Staff (to begin when stay-at-home order ends, or a significant increase in in-office staff working) In order to further protect yourself and others from the spread of the COVID-19 virus, the CDC guidelines recommend the use of facemasks in public places or while at work in group settings (2 or more), except when in a private space such as an office, individual cubicle, or single occupant vehicle. These guidelines are in addition to all other social distancing guidelines that have been issued by the CDC and MN Department of Health related to the COVID-19 virus. Mindful of the City's goal to protect the health and safety of our employees and community members, all City staff and visitors will adhere to the CDC guidance and utilize facemasks while in our facility and at work in group settings. EMPLOYEE GROUPS City Hall Staff Masks are required during/for any job duties with customer contact, while in public areas of the building, and while at work in group settings (2 or more) where social distancing cannot be practiced. Inspection Staff and Other Workers while in the Field When in the field, no masks are required unless employees need to ride together in a vehicle; or for work requiring being in close proximity (within 6 feet) of each other or members of the public. Masks should also be worn when in a home, for example water meter replacement, building inspection, etc. Staff should not enter homes where there is an active COVID-19 case or someone is under quarantine or self-isolation due to an exposure or symptoms. Public Works and Parks Maintenance No masks are required unless employees need to ride together in a vehicle; or for work requiring being in close proximity (within 6 feet) of each other or members of the public. POLICY • Masks must cover the nose and mouth. • Masks are not required while in private spaces such as an office or single occupant vehicle. • Acceptable facemasks can be homemade masks, paper masks, cloth masks, sports type face coverings, surgical masks, etc. N95 masks are not required or needed. The fabric/design for a personal mask should be work appropriate. • The City will provide up to 3 masks per person, with the intention that a mask will only be worn every third day, which should allow decontamination of the mask before the next use. Employees using their own homemade masks should also rotate their masks daily using this same 3 day approach, or launder the (cloth) mask between uses if used more frequently. • In some cases wearing a mask is not medically advised. Exceptions will be made as requested. Employees should be aware that asking a coworker why they aren’t wearing a mask is prohibited. This policy will be reevaluated every two weeks to determine if it is still needed. Face Mask Policy for Medina Visitors Visitors will be highly encouraged to wear a face mask while in the building. As per CDC guidelines, children under the age of 2 will not be asked to wear a mask. G:\Group Data\Municipal\Clients - Cities - Counties\Medina\Proposals\2020 Hunter Park Master Plan\LTR PROPOSAL - Hunter Park Master Plan_2020- 0610.docx 7 0 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | S U I T E 3 0 0 | M I N N E A P O L I S , M N | 55 4 1 6 | 7 6 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | W S B E N G . C O M June 10, 2020 Jodi Gallup Assistant City Administrator City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Re: Hunter Field Park Master Plan Proposal Dear Ms. Gallup: I am pleased to submit this letter proposal on behalf of WSB to the City of Medina (City) for the Hunter Field Park Master Plan. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING It is our understanding that this project is to include the creation of a master plan for the Hunter Field Park location to be implemented during future redevelopment projects. The master plan should account for varying layout options for consideration that would be refined into a preferred design approach. SCOPE OF SERVICES The following scope of services is meant to provide the City with the steps necessary to complete a successful master plan that will set the stage for future development. WSB is always willing to adjust our scope of services as necessary in order to be more tailored to your needs or account for budgetary concerns. A.Project Start-Up, Management, Data Collection & Programming: WSB will gather all pertinent project related data, set up project documents, and provide ongoing project management. a.Project Start-Up & Programming: WSB will confirm the list of preliminary programming options discussed at a site meeting held on June 4, 2020 and set the project schedule. b.Data Collection: WSB will gather project data from the City, including any GIS or CAD files, and will create a base map utilizing City data, lidar topography and county aerial imagery. No wetland delineation or topographical survey services are included. B.Master Plan Development: This task includes the design steps necessary to create a master plan which will include the following: a.Conceptual Plans: WSB will prepare two to three alternative conceptual designs for the park based on programming, existing conditions, opportunities, site circulation, unique features, etc. Each concept is meant to provide a varying degree or approach to redevelopment for consideration. Agenda Item # 5B City of Medina June 10, 2020 Page 2 G:\Group Data\Municipal\Clients - Cities - Counties\Medina\Proposals\2020 Hunter Park Master Plan\LTR PROPOSAL - Hunter Park Master Plan_2020- 0610.docx b. Staff Review Meeting: One (1) virtual city staff review meeting of the concept plans will be held with any necessary refinements made following the review meeting and prior to public review. c. Public Engagement: Concept plans will be available for public review and comment utilizing an online method, such as a Social Pinpoint interactive map that allows for an interactive review and feedback of each of the concept plans. d. Park Commission Meeting: One (1) virtual public meeting to be held with the Parks Commission to present the conceptual plans and a summary of the community responses and design preferences from the online engagement platform. The feedback and options will be discussed in order to identify which combination of design elements to carry forward into the preliminary master plan. e. Preliminary Master Plan: WSB will prepare a preliminary master plan based on feedback from the community and the City that represents the design solution that best responds to the needs and desires of the stakeholders. A preliminary estimate of probable cost for construction shall be prepared for the preliminary master plan. f. Staff Review Meeting: One (1) virtual staff review meeting of the preliminary master plan and estimate will be held with any necessary refinements made. g. Park Commission Meeting: One (1) virtual public meeting to be held with the Parks Commission to present the Preliminary Master Plan for review. h. Final Master Plan: WSB will make any necessary modifications to the preliminary master plan and estimate of probable costs for construction to create the final master plan. It is assumed that the City will take the final master plan to a council meeting for approval and adoption. C. Additional Services: Services other than those listed in the Scope of Services above and requested and authorized in writing by the City. These services shall be billed on an hourly basis according to the current Hourly Rate Schedule. ASSUMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS The Scope of Services outlined above is based on the following assumptions and exclusions. A. 3-D graphics and visualizations of the plan are not included but can be added to the scope for an additional fee. B. Playground equipment design is not included, but rather the plan will identify location, size and preferred characteristics. C. Architectural design services are not included. City of Medina June 10, 2020 Page 3 G:\Group Data\Municipal\Clients - Cities - Counties\Medina\Proposals\2020 Hunter Park Master Plan\LTR PROPOSAL - Hunter Park Master Plan_2020- 0610.docx FEE PROPOSAL It is proposed that the Scope of Services identified in Tasks A and B above to be billed on a n hourly not to exceed basis of $12,000 (Twelve Thousand Dollars). If you are in agreement with the terms as outlined above, please sign where indicated below and return one copy to our office. Sincerely, Candace Amberg, PLA Sr. Project Manager ACCEPTED BY: City of Medina Signature: Authorized Signature Title: Date: Resolution No. 2020- June 16, 2020 657508.v1 Member __________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION 2020-## RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ESTATE OF ROBERT ROEHL FOR THE ROEHL HEIGHTS PLAT WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, The Estate of Robert Roehl (the “Owner”) owns property located at 1735 Medina Road (the “Property”), which is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Owner has requested preliminary plat approval for Roehl Heights, a subdivision of the Property into two separate lots; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on May 12, 2020, reviewed the information provided by the Owner and City staff, heard testimony from interested parties, and recommended approval of the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the request at the June 2, 2020 meeting, reviewed the testimony, and considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, subject to the fulfillment of the conditions noted below, the City Council makes the following findings of fact in regard to the preliminary plat based on the requirements of the City’s subdivision ordinance: a. The proposed preliminary plat is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and is not premature for consideration. b. The subdivision is appropriate for the physical conditions on the site including the topography, storm water, natural resources, and soils. c. The proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage. d. The proposed subdivision is not likely to be injurious to public health. e. The proposed subdivision and its improvements will not conflict with public or private streets, easements, or right-of-ways. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby approves the conditional use permit for the accessory structure noted above, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1) The Owner shall pay cash-in-lieu of dedicating park land in an amount of $8,000. 2) The proposed septic sites shall be fenced off upon approval of the preliminary plat. Agenda Item # 5C Resolution No. 2020- June 16, 2020 657508.v1 3) The plat shall provide 50 feet of right-of-way for County Road 24 as requested by Hennepin County. 4) The requirements of the wetland protection ordinance shall be met. Buffer vegetation and signage upon the northern lot may be implemented at the time of construction on the lot but shall be completed immediately upon the southern lot. 5) Construction access for the northern lot shall be from Medina Road, or improvements shall be provided by the Owner on Morgan Road as recommended by the City Engineer to accommodate construction traffic. 6) The Owner shall submit title documentation and meet the requirements of the City Attorney related to title matters. 7) The final plat application shall be filed within 180 days of the date of the City Council resolution granting preliminary approval or the approval shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council. 8) The Owner shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat and associated documents. Dated: June 16, 2020. By: ______________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: By: ___________________________ Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2020- June 16, 2020 657508.v1 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property OSI – Cavanaughs Meadowwood Park 3rd Page 1 of 3 June 16, 2020 Final Plat City Council Meeting MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: June 10, 2020 MEETING: June 16, 2020 City Council SUBJ: OSI – Cavanaugh Meadowwoods Park 3rd Addition – Final Plat Background On March 17, 2020, the City Council adopted resolution 2020-15, granting preliminary approval to Arrowhead Holdings (entity related to OSI which holds real estate) for the platting of property at 4101 Arrowhead Drive and the property adjacent to the north. The subject property is located west of Arrowhead Drive and north of Highway 55. The plat incorporates some of the vacant outlot to the north into the 4101 Arrowhead Drive lot to allow for parking necessary to support an addition to the existing building. The City Council also adopted various other approvals related to the building addition on the same night and approved of a development agreement related to the project. The owner has now requested final approval of the plat and submitted final plans for construction. Consistency with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, zoning and subdivision regulations, and other relevant policies was reviewed during review of the Preliminary Plat. The purpose of a final plat review is to ensure that the final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat and to ensure that all the conditions of approval have been met. Consistency with Preliminary Plat The proposed final plat is almost identical with the approved preliminary plat, except the applicant has removed right-of-way at the northeast corner of Outlot A from the plat. The preliminary plat approval had allowed this right-of-way to be granted in the future rather than upon the plat, provided the property owner enters into an agreement with the City related to such action. Execution of this agreement is one of the conditions recommended by staff for final plat approval. Preliminary Plat Conditions Several conditions were applied to the preliminary plat approval. The following section reviews compliance with these conditions. 1. The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include the conditions described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy. Staff recommends that execution of the development agreement be included as a condition of final plat approval. Agenda Item # 7A OSI – Cavanaughs Meadowwood Park 3rd Page 2 of 3 June 16, 2020 Final Plat City Council Meeting 2. The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated December 18, 2019 except as may be modified herein. The design of all improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing construction. Staff recommends that similar language be included as a condition of final plat approval. 3. The Applicant shall enter into a petition and waiver agreement with the City to contribute towards improvements to Arrowhead Drive in the vicinity of the Property in lieu of constructing such improvements. Staff recommends that execution of the petition and waiver be included as a condition of final plat approval. 4. The Applicant shall update plans to relocate the driveway to intersect at Meander Road and execute an easement and maintenance agreement acceptable to the City Attorney to provide for shared access for Lot 1, Block 1, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Third Addition and Outlot A, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Second Addition. The applicant has included a plan sheet showing the relocation of the driveway and it is included as a requirement in the development agreement. 5. The Applicant shall pay $62,471 park dedication fee. Park dedication for Outlot A shall be deferred until such time as Outlot A is platted and developed, when the fee shall be calculated based upon then-current land values. Staff recommends that similar language be included as a condition of final plat approval. 6. The plat shall dedicate additional right-of-way as recommended by the City Engineer. The Applicant may grant the right-of-way for the future realignment of Arrowhead Drive at future Chippewa Road in the northeast portion of the Property through a separate easement agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney rather than the dedication as shown on the preliminary plat. The Development agreement requires execution of these easement agreements. Staff recommends that similar language be included as a condition of final plat approval. 7. The Applicant shall provide right-of-way necessary for construction of the left turn lanes at the location of the driveway and Meander Road. The applicant has proposed to provide this right-of-way as a separate easement, the execution of which is included in the Development Agreement. Staff recommends that similar language be included as a condition of final plat approval. 8. The plat shall dedicate a drainage and utility easement for construction of stormwater improvements for the additional turn-lanes to be constructed on Arrowhead Drive. The applicant has proposed to provide this easement as a separate easement, the execution of which is included in the Development Agreement. Staff recommends that similar language be included as a condition of final plat approval. 9. Any agreement related to this approval shall require the consent of Minneapolis, as the owner of Property. The property has been conveyed to the applicant, so this condition is no longer required. OSI – Cavanaughs Meadowwood Park 3rd Page 3 of 3 June 16, 2020 Final Plat City Council Meeting 10. The plat shall dedicate drainage and utility easement over the public portion of the watermain, stormwater improvements, wetlands and 10 feet wide along the perimeter of the lot and outlot. The plat submitted provides these easements. 11. The dead-end watermains and hydrants located on these dead-end watermains shall be privately maintained. This is an informational statement, and staff recommends that similar language be included as a condition of final plat approval. 12. The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site improvements in order to ensure completion. The Development agreement requires provision of the letter of credit. Staff recommends that similar language be included as a condition of final plat approval. 13. The final plat application shall be filed within 180 days of the date of the resolution granting preliminary approval or the approval shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council. Final plat approval was requested within 180 days. 14. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, construction plans, and other relevant documents. Staff recommends that similar language be included as a condition of final plat approval. Staff Recommendation Staff believes the proposed plat appears to be consistent with the preliminary approval and relevant conditions of preliminary plat have either been satisfied, or are addressed within the development agreement and recommended as conditions of final plat approval. If the Council concurs, the following action would be appropriate: Move to adopt the resolution granting final plat approval for Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park 3rd Addition. Attachments 1. List of Documents 2. Final Plat Resolution 3. Final Plat of Cavanaugh Meadowwoods Park 3rd Addition 4. Construction Plans received 5/29/2020 (civil plans updated 6/9/2020) 6/10/2020 Project: LR-20-269 – OSI Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park 3rd Addition Final Plat The following documents are all part of the official record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall. Documents Submitted by Applicant Document Received Document Date Pages Electronic Paper Copy? Notes Application 5/13/2020 5/13/2020 3 Yes Yes Plat 5/13/2020 NA 2 Yes Yes Plans 5/29/2020 5/29/2020 159 Yes No Civil Plans-updated 6/9 6/9/2020 6/9/2020 13 Yes No Replaces 12 civil plans Plans-Updated 12/18/2019 12/18/2019 26 Yes Yes Stormsewer Calcs 6/9/2020 NA 2 Yes No Fire Truck Exhibit 6/9/2020 12/16/2019 1 Yes Delivery Truck Exhibit 6/9/2020 12/16/2019 1 Yes Engineering Response 6/9/2020 6/9/2020 10 Yes Title Commitment 6/4/2020 4/24/2020 8 Yes L1 Bl 1 only Title Supplement 6/9/2020 5/10/2020 9 Yes OL A; 13 pages w/ deed Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies Document Document Date # of pages Electronic Notes City Engineer comments 6/9/2020 7 Y Plat Opinion Preliminary Comments 6/9/2020 1 Y Email City Council Report 6/10/2020 3 Y Public Comments Document Date Electronic Notes Resolution No. 2020-## DATE 657426.v1 Member _______ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2020-## RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF THE CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOODS PARK THIRD ADDITION PLAT WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Arrowhead Holdings, LLC (the “Applicant”) owns property located west of Arrowhead Drive and north of State Highway 55 (the “Property”), which is legally described as: Outlot A, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Lot 1, Block 1, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lot 1, Block 1, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution 2020-15, which granted preliminary approval to plat the Property into one lot and one outlot as Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Third Addition, subject to certain terms and conditions; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has made an application for final approval of the plat; and WHEREAS, on June 16, 2020, the City Council reviewed the proposed final plat for consistency with the approved preliminary plat and compliance with the relevant terms and conditions and heard testimony from city staff, the Applicant and other interested parties; and WHEREAS, subject to the fulfillment of the conditions noted below, the City Council makes the following findings of fact in regard to the plat based on the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance: a. The proposed preliminary plat is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and is not premature for consideration. b. The subdivision is appropriate for the physical conditions on the site including the topography, storm water, natural resources, and soils. c. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development and meets minimum lot size standards. d. The proposed subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage. e. The proposed subdivision is not likely to be injurious to public health. The proposed subdivision and its improvements will not conflict with public or private streets, easements, or right-of-ways. Resolution No. 20 20-## 2 DATE 657426.v1 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby grants final plat approval for Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Third Addition, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement in the general form of that presented to and approved by the City Council at its March 17, 2020 meeting. Said agreement includes the requirements described below as well as other relevant requirements of City ordinance and policy, and the final version thereof shall be subject to final review and approval of the City Attorney. 2. The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the civil plans dated June 9, 2020 and architectural plans dated May 29, 2020 except as may be modified herein. 3. Final plans shall be updated as necessary to meet the recommendations of the City Engineer. 4. The Applicant shall enter into a petition and waiver agreement with the City to contribute towards improvements to Arrowhead Drive in the vicinity of the Property in lieu of constructing such improvements. 5. The Applicant shall submit construction plans for the relocation of the driveway to intersect at Meander Road and execute an easement and maintenance declaration acceptable to the City Attorney to provide for shared access for Lot 1, Block 1, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Third Addition and Outlot A, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Second Addition. Following approval of the construction plans by the City, the Applicant shall complete the driveway relocation. 6. The Applicant shall pay $62,471 park dedication fee. Park dedication for Outlot A shall be deferred until such time as Outlot A is platted and developed, when the fee shall be calculated based upon then-current land values. 7. The Applicant shall execute a right-of-way easement agreement and restrictive covenant in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney related to granting of the right-of-way in the northeast corner of the plat in the future. 8. The Applicant shall execute the right-of-way easement necessary for construction of the left turn lanes at the location of the driveway and Meander Road. 9. The Applicant shall execute a drainage and utility easement for construction of stormwater improvements for the additional turn-lanes to be constructed on Arrowhead Drive. 10. The dead-end watermains and hydrants located on these dead-end watermains shall be privately maintained. 11. The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site improvements in order to ensure completion. 12. The Applicant shall meet the requirements of the City Attorney related to the plat opinion and matters of document recordation and title matters. 13. The plat shall be recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder within 180 days of the date of the City Council resolution granting approval or the approval shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the Applicant and approved by the City Council. Resolution No. 20 20-## 3 DATE 657426.v1 14. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the plat, construction plans, and other relevant documents. Dated: By: ______________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: By: ___________________________ Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ________ upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. LANDSCAPE PLAN landscape plan 0'10'20'40' n twenty 1 key notes HARDWOOD SHREDDED MULCH; APPLY TO A 4" DEPTH WITH PELLET WEED PREVENTER UNDER MULCH. 2 1 2" TRAP ROCK MULCH INSTALLED TO A 3" DEPTH ON NON-WOVEN LANDSCAPE FABRIC 2 IRRIGATION: PROVIDE IRRIGATION FOR SOD AREAS WITHIN THE IRRIGATION LIMITS FOR 100 % COVERAGE. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL SHRUB AND PERENNIAL AREAS. PROVIDE SHOP DRAWING FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM INCLUDING HEAD LAYOUT, SPACING, TYPE, BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATIONS, POINT OF CONNECTION, SLEEVES, CONTROLLER, VALVE BOX LOCATIONS, ZONE INDICATIONS AND PIPE SIZING. PROVIDE ON-SITE OPERATION TUTORIAL FOR OWNER AN INCLUDE ALL MANUALS AND INFORMATION ON THE SYSTEM. PROVIDE AND INSTALL RID-O-RUST SYSTEM WITH THE IRRIGATION TO PREVENT IRON STAINING FOLLOW CITY OF MEDINA CODES FOR IRRIGATION. 3 planting schedule 1.CONFIRM ALL QUANTITIES, SHAPES AND LOCATIONS OF BEDS, AND ADJUST AS REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO THE SITE CONDITIONS. CONFIRM ANY ADJUSTMENTS WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 2.LOCATE ALL UTILITIES. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE FROM THE SITE ALL SOD/TURF WHICH HAS BEEN REMOVED FOR NEW PLANT BEDS. ANY PLANT STOCK NOT PLANTED ON DAY OF DELIVERY SHALL BE HEELED IN AND WATERED UNTIL INSTALLATION. PLANTS NOT MAINTAINED IN THIS MANNER WILL BE REJECTED. 4.THE PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST. ADVISE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID DAMAGING EXISTING TREES. DO NOT STORE OR DRIVE HEAVY MATERIALS OVER TREE ROOTS. DO NOT DAMAGE TREE BARK OR BRANCHES. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS, FIXTURES AND BUILDINGS CLEAN AND UNSTAINED. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. THE PROJECT SITE SHALL BE KEPT CLEAR OF CONSTRUCTION WASTES AND DEBRIS. 7.THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN ON THE PLAN. MULCH, PLANTING SOIL AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS PLANTING COMPONENTS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE RELATED PLAN. VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES. 8.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING AND ALL PLANT CARE UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER. 9.PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF PLANTINGS IS COMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND PLANTING IS ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE 10.MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WATERING, WEEDING, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIAL PRIOR TO GROWING SEASON, RE-SETTING PLANTS AND PROPER GRADE, AND KEEPING PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING THE TREES PLUMB THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 11.WATERING: MAINTAIN A WATERING SCHEDULE WHICH WILL THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS ONCE A WEEK AND SOD EVERY OTHER DAY UNTIL ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER. IN EXTREMELY HOT, DRY WEATHER, WATER MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS OF HEAT STRESS SUCH AS WILTING LEAVES. CHECK MOISTURE UNDER MULCH PRIOR TO WATERING TO DETERMINE NEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER. planting notes 2 2 2 1 3 3 3 3 3 A A A A SOUTH NO DATE ISSUE / REVISION DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:L1.0 THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2" x 1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS. PROJECT NUMBER: 190012 COPYRIGHT 2019 BY AF LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DATE:REG. NO.: SIGNATURE: TYPED OR PRINTED NAME: I HEREBY CERTIFY that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jason Aune 4/13/2020 42162 client project certification issue / revision sheet title OSI 4101 Arrowhead Drive Medina, MN 55340 755 prior avenue n suite 103, st. paul, mn 55104 651.341.361 or 651.248.6155 aune fernandez landscape architects OSI 4101 Arrowhead Drive Medina, MN 55340 Cobeck Construction 218 13th Avenue South South St. Paul, MN 55075 1 11-7-2019 CITY SITE PLAN REVIEW 2 12-18-2019 CITY SITE PLAN RE-SUBMITTAL 3 4-13-2020 ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 12" TOPSOIL FROM STOCKPILED TOPSOIL ON SITE; PULVERIZED ON SITE ALL SODDED(LAWN) AREA SHALL RECEIVE 4" MIN. TOPSOIL FROM STOCKPILED TOPSOIL ON SITE planting soil notes B A 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 PROPOSED ADDITION EXISTING BUILDING d d d d d d d 6 2 1/2" BB AJ 7 2 1/2" BB AJ 1 2 1/2" BB GI 1 2 1/2" BB GI 4 8` BB PA 4 8` BB PA 19 #1 Cont. CK 19 #1 Cont. CK 19 #1 Cont. CK 19 #1 Cont. CK 7 8` BB PA 3,940 sf drilled seed SEED 1 19 #1 Cont. CK 19 #1 Cont. CK 19 #1 Cont. CK ADD ALTERNATE #4: REMOVE EXISTING DOGWOOD IN TRAP ROCK MULCH BED; TRANSPLANT DOGWOOD TO AN AREA IDENTIFIED BY OWNER; TOP DRESS TRAP ROCK MULCH AFTER NEW PLANTINGS ARE INSTALLED 3'-0" TRAP ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP SOD LAWN SOD LAWN SOD LAWN 3'-0" TRAP ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP 3'-0" TRAP ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP ALUM. EDGE TYP. ALUM. EDGE TYP. TRAP ROCK TRAP ROCK SEED KBG SEED IN GRASS PAVE AREA SOD LAWN SOD LAWN REMOVE ALL TREES AND STUMPS IN THIS AREA; REMOVE ROCK AND RE-USE ON OTHER PARTS OF PROJECT REPAIR SOD AS REQUIRED TRANSFORMER AREA HIGH W A Y 5 5 4 L1.1 ALUM. EDGE TYP.4 L1.1 4 L1.0 SOD LAWN 3'-0" TRAP ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP ADD ALTERNATE #4: REMOVE EXISTING DOGWOOD AND TRAP ROCK MULCH BED; TRANSPLANT DOGWOOD TO AN AREA IDENTIFIED BY OWNER; INSTALL SOD AND NEW MAINTENANCE STRIP. EXISTING TREES ALUM. EDGE TYP. 1 L1.1 PERNNIAL PLANTING TYP. 1 L1.1 PERNNIAL PLANTING TYP. 4 L1.1ALUM. EDGE TYP. 2 L1.1DECIDUOUS TREE TYP. 2 L1.0DECIDUOUS TREE TYP.2 L1.0DECIDUOUS TREE TYP. 3 L1.1 CONIFEROUS TREE TYP. EXISTING TREES APPROX. SOD LIMITS APPROX. SEED LIMITS GENERATOR AREA TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT AJ 13 Acer rubrum ` JFS-KW78` / Armstrong Gold Columnar Maple 2 1/2" BB GI 2 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis `Impcole` TM / Imperial Honeylocust 2 1/2" BB PA 15 Picea abies / Norway Spruce 8` BB PERRENIALS CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE CK 133 Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster` / Feather Reed Grass #1 Cont. HT 36" W 18" GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SEED 2 1,150 sf Poa pratensis / Kentucky Bluegrass seed PP 20,424 sf Poa pratensis / Kentucky Bluegrass sod PLANT SCHEDULE 20 SCALE LANDSCAPE PLAN planting schedule landscape plan 0'15'30'60' n thirty NORTH ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 12" TOPSOIL FROM STOCKPILED TOPSOIL ON SITE. TOP SOIL SHALL BE PULVERIZED ON SITE. ALL SODDED(LAWN) AREA SHALL RECEIVE 4" MIN. TOPSOIL FROM STOCKPILED TOPSOIL ON SITE planting soil notes B A 1 key notes HARDWOOD SHREDDED MULCH; APPLY TO A 4" DEPTH WITH PELLET WEED PREVENTER UNDER MULCH. 2 1 2" TRAP ROCK MULCH INSTALLED TO A 3" DEPTH ON NON-WOVEN LANDSCAPE FABRIC 2 IRRIGATION: PROVIDE IRRIGATION FOR SOD AREAS WITHIN THE IRRIGATION LIMITS FOR 100 % COVERAGE. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL SHRUB AND PERENNIAL AREAS. PROVIDE SHOP DRAWING FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM INCLUDING HEAD LAYOUT, SPACING, TYPE, BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATIONS, POINT OF CONNECTION, SLEEVES, CONTROLLER, VALVE BOX LOCATIONS, ZONE INDICATIONS AND PIPE SIZING. PROVIDE ON-SITE OPERATION TUTORIAL FOR OWNER AN INCLUDE ALL MANUALS AND INFORMATION ON THE SYSTEM 3 13 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 A A A A A A A A A A A 3 A A A A A A A A NO DATE ISSUE / REVISION DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:L1.1 THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2" x 1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS. PROJECT NUMBER: 190012 COPYRIGHT 2019 BY AF LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DATE:REG. NO.: SIGNATURE: TYPED OR PRINTED NAME: I HEREBY CERTIFY that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jason Aune 4/13/2020 42162 client project certification issue / revision sheet title OSI 4101 Arrowhead Drive Medina, MN 55340 755 prior avenue n suite 103, st. paul, mn 55104 651.341.361 or 651.248.6155 aune fernandez landscape architects OSI 4101 Arrowhead Drive Medina, MN 55340 Cobeck Construction 218 13th Avenue South South St. Paul, MN 55075 1 11-7-2019 CITY SITE PLAN REVIEW 2 12-18-2019 CITY SITE PLAN RE-SUBMITTAL 3 4-13-2020 ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION scale: nts perennial1 scale: nts deciduous tree2scale: nts coniferous tree tree3scale: nts alum. edge4 3 1 3 B B B B B 3 4 2 1/2" BB GI 2 2 1/2" BB GI 2 2 1/2" BB GI 2 2 1/2" BB GI 2 2 1/2" BB GI 6 8` BB PA 4 8` BB PA 1 8` BB PA 9 2 1/2" BB GI 10 2 1/2" BB GI6 2 1/2" BB GI 3 2 1/2" BB GI 77 #1 Cont. CK 9,462 sf drilled seed SEED 1 15,873 sf drilled seed SEED 3 40,159 sf drilled seed SEED 1 8,493 sf drilled seed SEED 3 2 8` BB PA 9 7` BB TO2 SOD LAWN IN ALL PARKING ISLANDS 4'-0" SOD LAWN MOW STRIP 4'-0" SOD LAWN MOW STRIP 4'-0" SOD LAWN MOW STRIP 4'-0" SOD LAWN MOW STRIP SOD LAWN IN ALL PARKING ISLANDS NATURAL EDGE AROUND PARKING LOT TYP. NATURAL EDGE AROUND PARKING LOT TYP. NATURAL EDGE AROUND PARKING LOT TYP. NATURAL EDGE AROUND PARKING LOT TYP. NATURAL EDGE AROUND PARKING LOT TYP. ALUM. EDGE TYP.4 L1.1 1 L1.1 PERNNIAL PLANTING TYP. 3 L1.1 SOD LAWN 3 L1.1 CONIFEROUS TREE TYP. ALUM. EDGE TYP.4 L1.1 CONIFEROUS TREE TYP. 2 L1.1 DECIDUOUS TREE TYP. 2 L1.1 DECIDUOUS TREE TYP. 2 L1.1 DECIDUOUS TREE TYP. EXISTING WETLAND EXISTING WETLAND APPROXIMATE SEED BOUNDARY APPROXIMATE SEED BOUNDARY APPROXIMATE SEED BOUNDARY APPROXIMATE SEED BOUNDARY APPROXIMATE SEED BOUNDARY TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT GI 40 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis `Impcole` TM / Imperial Honeylocust 2 1/2" BB PA 13 Picea abies / Norway Spruce 8` BB TO2 9 Thuja occidentalis `Techny` / Techny Arborvitae 7` BB Small Coniferous Tree PERRENIALS CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE CK 77 Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster` / Feather Reed Grass #1 Cont. HT 36" W 18" GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SPACING PP 29,661 sf Poa pratensis / Kentucky Bluegrass sod SEED 1 49,622 sf SHORT DRY GRASS MIX drilled seed SEED 3 24,366 sf TALL/WET WILDFLOWER MIX drilled seed SUBSOIL LOOSENED SUBSOIL PLANTING SOIL FINISHED GRADE MULCH (4" DEEP), REFER TO SPECIFICATION CUT SLITS IN ORGANIC CONTAINER TO FACILITATE ROOT PENETRATION. IF CONTAINER IS NON-ORGANIC, REMOVE COMPLETELY. NOTE: SPACING PER PLAN 6" EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ. PLAN SECTION TYPICAL OFFSET SPACING 6 0 ° 90° TYPICAL GRID SPACING NOTES: 1.IT IS THE CONTRACTORS OPTION TO STAKE TREES; HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 2.SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. 3.DO NOT PLANT TOO DEEP: EXPOSE TOP OF ROOT FLARE AND PULL MULCH AWAY FROM TRUNK. 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP) (TYPICAL) DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE, 2 SPACED EQUALLY AT OPPOSITE SIDES SOD TO TRUNK OF TREE TOPSOIL PER SPECIFICATION SOD TOPSOIL ROOTBALL TO SIT ON SUBGRADE, CUT ALL ROPES AND REMOVE NON-ORGANIC CONTAINERS SUBGRADE FOOTFLARE SHALL BE EXPOSED AND SET AT GRADE 18" MIN 6'-0" STEEL STAKE 4' - 0 " + / - 2' M I N . NO MULCH RINGS ON TREES NOTES: 1.CONIFER TO HAVE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. NO MULCH TO BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK. 2.SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. 3.TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE ILLUSTRATED. 4.IT IS THE CONTRACTORS OPTION TO STAKE TREES; HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 5.DO NOT PLANT TOO DEEP: EXPOSE TOP OF ROOT FLARE AND PULL MULCH AWAY FROM TRUNK. VA R I E S 2' M I N . 18" MIN 6'-0" STEEL STAKE DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE, 3'0" @ 120' INTERVALS (TYPICAL) 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP) (TYPICAL) FLAGGING (ONE PER WIRE) MULCH (4" DEEP) REFER TO SPECIFICATION TOPSOIL, PER SPECIFICATION WOOD OR STEEL STAKE SET AT ANGLE LAWN ROOTBALL TO SIT ON SUBGRADE, CUT ALL ROPES AND REMOVE INORGANIC CONTAINERS SUBGRADE LAWN BED MEDIA OR AGGREGATE 4" MILL FINISH ALUMINUM EDGING 12" STAKES LOCKED INTO EDGING MARK DATE A1.0 BI M c l o u d : S e r v e r . l o c a l - B I M c l o u d B a s i c f o r A R C H I C A D 2 2 / O p e n S y s t e m s I n t e r n a t i o n a l / C D 1 . 0 Fr i d a y , M a y 2 9 , 2 0 2 0 8: 2 6 A M 700 41st Avenue North St. Cloud, Minnesota USA 56303 320.251.3304 www.negenarchitects.com STUDIO TELEPHONE WEB I hereby certify that this plan, speciﬁcation, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: Lon Negen Signature: Date: 5/29/20 License No: 41402 Certiﬁcation COMM. NO.: ARCHITECT: DATE: DRAWN BY:#CAD Technician Full Name 5/29/20 LDN 191001 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Revisions Consultant The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the expressed written consent of Negen & Associates, Inc. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors government agencies vendors and ofﬁce personnel only in accordance with this notice. © 2004-2020 Negen and Associates, St. Cloud, MN 56303 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 4101 Arrowhead Drive Medina, MN 55340 OSI, Inc. Corporate Headquarters Addition W E T L A N D W E T L A N D A R R E A D O W H V E R I W E T L A N D D W E T L A N D BUILDING AREA = 68,883 SQUARE FEET Gene r a t o r E top o f w a l l Rail i n g a t Chain l i n k f e n c e Wal lCon c r e t e Drain Trenc h Ov e r h a n g EXISTING BUILDING x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x xxxxxxxxx SIGN SI G N Well Vault Geothermal CB 2 CB 1 14 8 10 6 10 10 10 10 9 15 8 5 17 7 9 7 9 9 6 20 20 14 16 14 14 9 14 9 4 FFE - 1006.0 STAT E H I G H W A Y N O . 5 5 16 16 8 19 15 19 16 16 16 PRO P O S E D P R O P E R T Y L I N E 10 10 10 9 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 9 16 16 16 16 16 18 19 8 15 6 6 6 BUILDING AREA=40,239.73 sq ft FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION RETAINING WALL NEW LIGHT POLE NEW LIGHT POLE NEW LIGHT POLE RELOCATED EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING LIGH T POLE EXISTING LIGH T POLE EXISTING LIGH T POLE EXISTING LIGH T POLE EXISTING LIGH T POLE EXISTING LIGH T POLE EXISTING LIGH T POLE EXISTING LIGH T POLE EXISTING LIGH T POLE NEW LIGHT POLE NEW LIGHT POLE NEW LIGHT POLE NEW LIGHT POLE NEW LIGHT POLE NEW LIGHT POLE NEW LIGHT POLE NEW LIGHT POLE NEW LIGHT POLE NEW LIGHT POLE EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN EXISTING LIGHT POLE RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL NEW LIGHT POLE NEW LIGHT POLE GRASSPAVE SURFACE DISEL FUEL STANDPIPE BOLLARD, TYPICAL DECORATIVE METAL RAILING, REQUIRED @ ALL LOCATIONS WHERE GRADE DIFFERENCE IS GREATER THAN 2'-6" REMOVE & REPLACE CONCRETE, ALTERNATE REMOVE & REPLACE CONCRETE, ALTERNATE REMOVE & REPLACE CONCRETE, ALTERNATE STAMPED & COLORED CONCRETE PAVING, PATTERN & COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY OWNER PROPOSED BUILDING 50'- 0 " B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 25'- 0 " P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 50 ' - 0 " B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 10'-0" PARKING SETBACK 50'-0" BUILDING SETBACK 2 5 ' - 0 " P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 5 0 ' - 0 " B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 10'- 0 " P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 25'- 0 " B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K PRO P E R T Y L I N E 4 6 420 PARKING STALLS 150 FUTURE PARKING STALLS 343 PARKING STALLS SCALE: 1" = 50' 1 SITE PLAN A1.0 0 20'50'100' MARK DATE A3.0 BI M c l o u d : S e r v e r . l o c a l - B I M c l o u d B a s i c f o r A R C H I C A D 2 2 / O p e n S y s t e m s I n t e r n a t i o n a l / C D 1 . 0 Fr i d a y , M a y 2 9 , 2 0 2 0 8: 2 6 A M 700 41st Avenue North St. Cloud, Minnesota USA 56303 320.251.3304 www.negenarchitects.com STUDIO TELEPHONE WEB I hereby certify that this plan, speciﬁcation, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: Lon Negen Signature: Date: 5/29/20 License No: 41402 Certiﬁcation COMM. NO.: ARCHITECT: DATE: DRAWN BY:#CAD Technician Full Name 5/29/20 LDN 191001 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS-OVERALL Revisions Consultant The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the expressed written consent of Negen & Associates, Inc. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors government agencies vendors and ofﬁce personnel only in accordance with this notice. © 2004-2020 Negen and Associates, St. Cloud, MN 56303 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 4101 Arrowhead Drive Medina, MN 55340 OSI, Inc. Corporate Headquarters Addition 117'-4" T.O. PRECAST 100'-0" FIRST FLR. 2'-8"7'-4"2'-8" BRICK, PRECAST PANEL STUCCO RIBBON WINDOW (4) 4" SLEEVES FOR EXISTING FIBER OPTIC LINES1'-0" C.I.P. CONCRETE STEM WALL THIS LOCATION ROOF DRAIN ESCUTCHEON ROOF DRAIN ESCUTCHEON CANTILEVERED ALUMINUM CANOPYCANTILEVERED ALUMINUM CANOPY ROOF DRAIN ESCUTCHEON PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED METAL COPING 88'-0" BASEMENT FLR. 116'-0" SECOND FLR. 100'-0" FIRST FLR. 96'-0" T.O. FOOTING 96'-0" T.O. WALL BUTT GLAZED WINDOW SYSTEM 88'-0" BASEMENT FLR. L M N 84'-0" T.O. FTG. J K RIBBON WINDOW BRICK, PRECAST PANEL STUCCO BUTT GLAZED WINDOW SYSTEM CONCRETE PRECAST WALL PANEL PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED METAL COPING 1" SIMULATED JOINT1" SIMULATED JOINT EXISTING ADDITION 116'-0" SECOND FLR. 100'-0" FIRST FLR. 117'-4" T.O. PRECAST 88'-0" BASEMENT FLR. 116'-0" SECOND FLR. 100'-0" FIRST FLR. 117'-4" T.O. PRECAST 100'-0" FIRST FLR. 84'-0" T.O. FOOTING STUCCO BUTT GLAZED WINDOW SYSTEMRIBBON WINDOW BRICK, PRECAST PANEL PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED METAL COPING GENERATOR 96'-0" T.O. FOOTING 116'-8" T.O. PRECAST 100'-0" FIRST FLR. N M L JK 2'-9" RIBBON WINDOW STUCCO BRICK, PRECAST PANEL EXISTINGADDITION 100'-0" FIRST FLR. 116'-0" SECOND FLR. 96'-0" T.O. FTG. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION A3.0 0 8'16'32' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 2 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION A3.0 0 8'16'32' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 3 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION A3.0 0 8'16'32' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 4 EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION A3.0 0 8'16'32' MARK DATE A3.1 BI M c l o u d : S e r v e r . l o c a l - B I M c l o u d B a s i c f o r A R C H I C A D 2 2 / O p e n S y s t e m s I n t e r n a t i o n a l / C D 1 . 0 Fr i d a y , M a y 2 9 , 2 0 2 0 8: 2 6 A M 700 41st Avenue North St. Cloud, Minnesota USA 56303 320.251.3304 www.negenarchitects.com STUDIO TELEPHONE WEB I hereby certify that this plan, speciﬁcation, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: Lon Negen Signature: Date: 5/29/20 License No: 41402 Certiﬁcation COMM. NO.: ARCHITECT: DATE: DRAWN BY:#CAD Technician Full Name 5/29/20 LDN 191001 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Revisions Consultant The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the expressed written consent of Negen & Associates, Inc. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors government agencies vendors and ofﬁce personnel only in accordance with this notice. © 2004-2020 Negen and Associates, St. Cloud, MN 56303 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 4101 Arrowhead Drive Medina, MN 55340 OSI, Inc. Corporate Headquarters Addition 117'-4" T.O. PRECAST 100'-0" FIRST FLR. 8 A8.1 10 A8.1 9 A8.1 16 A8.1 14 A8.1 15 A8.1 2'-8" BRICK, PRECAST PANEL STUCCO RIBBON WINDOW (4) 4" SLEEVES FOR EXISTING FIBER OPTIC LINES ROOF DRAIN ESCUTCHEON ROOF DRAIN ESCUTCHEON CANTILEVERED ALUMINUM CANOPY PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED METAL COPING 96'-0" T.O. FOOTING 10 A8.1 9 A8.1 8 A8.1 13 A8.1 12 A8.1 11 A8.1 2'-8"7'-4" (4) 4" SLEEVES FOR EXISTING FIBER OPTIC LINES 1'-0" C.I.P. CONCRETE STEM WALL THIS LOCATION ROOF DRAIN ESCUTCHEON CANTILEVERED ALUMINUM CANOPY ROOF DRAIN ESCUTCHEON 88'-0" BASEMENT FLR. 116'-0" SECOND FLR. 100'-0" FIRST FLR. 96'-0" T.O. WALL BUTT GLAZED WINDOW SYSTEM SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION A3.1 0 4'8'16' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION A3.1 0 4'8'16' MARK DATE A3.2 BI M c l o u d : S e r v e r . l o c a l - B I M c l o u d B a s i c f o r A R C H I C A D 2 2 / O p e n S y s t e m s I n t e r n a t i o n a l / C D 1 . 0 Fr i d a y , M a y 2 9 , 2 0 2 0 8: 2 6 A M 700 41st Avenue North St. Cloud, Minnesota USA 56303 320.251.3304 www.negenarchitects.com STUDIO TELEPHONE WEB I hereby certify that this plan, speciﬁcation, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: Lon Negen Signature: Date: 5/29/20 License No: 41402 Certiﬁcation COMM. NO.: ARCHITECT: DATE: DRAWN BY:#CAD Technician Full Name 5/29/20 LDN 191001 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Revisions Consultant The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the expressed written consent of Negen & Associates, Inc. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors government agencies vendors and ofﬁce personnel only in accordance with this notice. © 2004-2020 Negen and Associates, St. Cloud, MN 56303 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 4101 Arrowhead Drive Medina, MN 55340 OSI, Inc. Corporate Headquarters Addition 88'-0" BASEMENT FLR. L M N 84'-0" T.O. FTG. J K 2' - 2 " 6' - 1 1 " 2' - 1 1 " 1'-8 1/2"6'-7"1'-8 1/2"1'-8 1/2"6'-7"1'-8 1/2" RIBBON WINDOW BRICK, PRECAST PANEL STUCCO BUTT GLAZED WINDOW SYSTEM CONCRETE PRECAST WALL PANEL PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED METAL COPING 1" SIMULATED JOINT1" SIMULATED JOINT EXISTING ADDITION 116'-0" SECOND FLR. 100'-0" FIRST FLR. 117'-4" T.O. PRECAST 3 A8.1 2 A8.1 1 A8.1 116'-8" T.O. PRECAST 100'-0" FIRST FLR. N M L JK 2'-9" RIBBON WINDOW STUCCO BRICK, PRECAST PANEL EXISTINGADDITION 100'-0" FIRST FLR. 116'-0" SECOND FLR. 96'-0" T.O. FTG. 5 A8.1 7 A8.1 6 A8.1 4 A8.1 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION A3.2 0 4'8'16' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION A3.2 0 4'8'16' MARK DATE A3.3 BI M c l o u d : S e r v e r . l o c a l - B I M c l o u d B a s i c f o r A R C H I C A D 2 2 / O p e n S y s t e m s I n t e r n a t i o n a l / C D 1 . 0 Fr i d a y , M a y 2 9 , 2 0 2 0 8: 2 6 A M 700 41st Avenue North St. Cloud, Minnesota USA 56303 320.251.3304 www.negenarchitects.com STUDIO TELEPHONE WEB I hereby certify that this plan, speciﬁcation, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: Lon Negen Signature: Date: 5/29/20 License No: 41402 Certiﬁcation COMM. NO.: ARCHITECT: DATE: DRAWN BY:#CAD Technician Full Name 5/29/20 LDN 191001 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Revisions Consultant The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the expressed written consent of Negen & Associates, Inc. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors government agencies vendors and ofﬁce personnel only in accordance with this notice. © 2004-2020 Negen and Associates, St. Cloud, MN 56303 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 4101 Arrowhead Drive Medina, MN 55340 OSI, Inc. Corporate Headquarters Addition 117'-4" T.O. PRECAST 100'-0" FIRST FLR. 8 A8.1 10 A8.1 9 A8.1 STUCCO RIBBON WINDOW BRICK, PRECAST PANEL PREFINISHED METAL COPING 96'-0" T.O. FOOTING 88'-0" BASEMENT FLR. 116'-0" SECOND FLR. 100'-0" FIRST FLR. 84'-0" T.O. FOOTING BUTT GLAZED WINDOW SYSTEM PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED METAL COPING GENERATOR SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION A3.3 0 4'8'16' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION A3.3 0 4'8'16' MEMORANDUM TO: City Council, through City Administrator Scott Johnson FROM: Jim Stremel, City Engineer Dusty Finke, Planning Director Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: June 11, 2020 MEETING: June 16, 2020 City Council SUBJECT: Hackamore Rd Improvement Project – 30% Design Review Background: On February 18, 2020, the City Council authorized WSB to procced with design work for the Hackamore Road Improvement Project to a 30% completion level. The project generally extends from just west of County Road 116 (Medina Lake Drive) to just east of County Road 101 and was initiated jointly by the City of Corcoran and the City of Medina. The purpose of the project is to address deteriorating and insufficient infrastructure, to develop a cohesive plan that both cities can use to guide transportation needs, right-of-way, and pedestrian mobility along the corridor. The intention is to prepare a plan for the entire corridor to 75% completion, with the expectation that a series of projects will likely be completed over time to finalize the improvements. Completing the preliminary design work will allow both cities to require adequate right-of-way at the time of adjacent development and to determine what improvements are necessary at each intersection to allow the cities to require the construction of improvements which serve adjacent development at the time of development. Alternatives The proposal was to create two alternative designs for consideration by Medina and Corcoran at the 30% design level. The attached report includes two road alternatives and two trail alternatives. Each trail alternative could be incorporated into either road option. The intent was for the two cities to come to an agreement on one of the alternatives to proceed to 75% design. The two road designs are as follows: • Option 1 – Three-lane design for the full extents of the corridor (continuous left-hand turn lane) • Option 2 –Two-lane design with dedicated right/left turn lanes where warranted The strategy was to evaluate an option with a larger scope (Option 1) that has a larger footprint but provides a left-hand turn lane at every intersection and provides long-term flexibility against a Agenda Item # 7B 2 smaller scope (Option 2) which still meets the safety objectives of the corridor but has a smaller footprint and may offer less flexibility in the future. The trail options are both proposed on the north side of the roadway and can generally be described as follows: • Option 1 – Meandering Trail – this trail would extend outside of the road right-of-way where practical, especially in future development areas • Option 2 – Roadside Trail – this trail would follow go straight along Hackamore and be separated by a boulevard in most locations The trail alignments shown in the exhibits are interchangeable and could be constructed with either roadway option. Public Engagement WSB hosted a virtual open house on May 19 and has hosted an online forum and interactive activity. These are summarized more fully in the attached report. The best way to view the feedback on the online forum and interactive activity is to visit the webpage, because most responses are tied to specific locations on the map. Staff strongly encourages the Council to visit https://medinamn.us/hackamore to view the feedback. Much of the discussion at the virtual open house surrounded existing drainage concerns on adjoining properties and a desire to resolve them and not make the issue worse. The feedback on the online activity appeared to favor Roadway Option 2 (reduced footprint) and Trail Option 1 (meandering trail). Report Format At the current 30% level of design, two alternates for the roadway, trail, and intersection controls were developed. The intent of the enclosed report is to outline the process and development of the two design alternatives, describe the specific engineering analysis completed, review potential impacts of the two design alternatives, and to consider the next steps in the project development. The enclosed report includes the following engineering analysis and review: • Existing conditions • Traffic forecasting analysis • Traffic operations analysis • Turn lane analysis • Proposed improvements for both geometric options • Project cost estimates and potential finding mechanisms • Summary of the community engagement activities and agency coordination • Proposed project schedule • Summary, recommendations, and next steps 3 Costs and Funding WSB has estimated the following costs for the two alternatives: • Option 1: $6,999,482 • Option 2: $6,468,824 It is important to note that staff does not believe Medina would be responsible for half of these costs. The cities anticipate some of these costs will be borne by Hennepin County for improvements to signal systems and intersecting County Roads. Both cities also expect portions of the improvements or costs to be provided by adjacent development. For example, the City has secured a combination of approximately $300,000 cash and $300,000 in obligation for construction from the Reserve development. Discussions related to how the cities will split costs not covered by other agencies or adjacent development will need to occur as more information becomes available. Staff does not believe an equal split is appropriate based upon the amount of the expanded turn lanes to serve Corcoran projects. Recommendations & Next Steps: Based on the engineering analysis and review of the two design alternatives, staff in both cities recommend road design Option 2. This option minimizes the hard-cover increase and has fewer wetland impacts, a lower volume of runoff for stormwater management, less right-of-way impacts, and a lower cost. This option still provides the necessary corridor improvements and safety enhancements to accommodate current and future traffic levels. Generally, staff supports the meandering trail as much as possible. This would need to be analyzed more at 75% design. The next step is to consider further refinement of the design up to a 75% level for the entire corridor. This would also include cost refinements, a more specific analysis of funding mechanisms, and a more complete plan. The construction of the project area is proposed to be phased. Phase 1 of the project, which is roughly the east half of the corridor, could occur as soon as 2021. The need to construct the remaining two phases on the west half would likely be driven more by the adjacent residential development in both the cities of Medina and Corcoran. City Council Action Requested: Staff intends to present the two options in the 30% design at the City Council work session for discussion. The item is also included on the agenda at the regular meeting for June 16. After discussion at the work session, if the Council is in favor of proceeding with Option 2, staff would recommend the following action at the regular meeting: Motion to direct staff to proceed with design of the Hackamore Road Improvement project to a 75% level based upon Option 2. K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final.docx 7 0 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | S U I T E 3 0 0 | M I N N E A P O L I S , M N | 5 5 4 1 6 | 7 6 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | W S B E N G . C O M Memorandum To: Honorable Mayors and City Councils City of Corcoran City of Medina From: Jim Stremel, PE - Senior Project Manager Date: June 11, 2020 Re: Hackamore Road Improvement Project – 30% Design WSB Project No. R-015661-000 Project Scope & Background The Hackamore Road Improvement Project, extending from Medina Lake Drive to the approach of Brockton Lane N (CR 101), was initiated jointly by the City of Corcoran and the City of Medina. The project was not only initiated to address deteriorating and insufficient infrastructure, but to develop a cohesive plan that both cities can provide to adjacent property owners and developers to guide transportation needs, right-of-way, and pedestrian mobility in the area. At the current 30% level of design, two alternates for the roadway, trail, and intersection controls were developed. The intent of this report is to outline the process and development of the two design alternatives, necessary intersection controls, stormwater management needs, potential impacts of the two design alternatives, and to consider the next steps with the project development. Information and materials used in the preparation of this report were collected from the City of Corcoran, City of Medina, Hennepin County, MnDOT, and other impacted agencies. This data included: · Existing and historic traffic volume data · Current crash history · Proposed and anticipated development plans · As-built roadway plans · Survey/topographic data previously obtained or readily available · Wetland and floodplain locations from available delineations, GIS, or other mapping · Property Owner and Stakeholder engagement data · City franchise agreements with private utility companies · Soil borings and geotechnical report by Haugo Geotechnical Services, June 2019 Existing Conditions The proposed improvement project extends from Medina Lake Drive to the intersection at Brockton Lane N (CR 101) and the westerly intersection approach on CR 47 (Hackamore Road). The existing Hackamore Road is currently a 24-foot wide, bituminous paved rural section; no pedestrian facilities exist along this section of roadway. The alignment of the roadway is generally straight with no horizontal curves. The current posted speed is 40 MPH in both directions. Based on a 40 MPH speed, a vertical curve on the easterly portion of the project (the westerly approach to CR 101) is deficient and does not provide the required sight distance. Crash data from the past 3 years (2017-2019) was collected for the Hackamore Road corridor. The data shows that over the past three years there has been 11 crashes in the corridor. 10 of Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 11, 2020 Page 2 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final.docx the crashes have occurred at the County Road intersections and just one at the internal street intersections. Table 1 show the crash data by year for each location. Table 1: Crash Summary by Year Location 2017 2018 2019 Total Crashes PI PD PI PD PI PD Hackamore Road at Pinto Dr (CSAH 116) 0 2 0 1 1 1 5 Hackamore Road at Hunter Road 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Hackamore Road at Brocton Lane (CSAH 101) 1 1 1 1 0 1 5 PD = Property Damage, PI = Personal Injury Pavements in the study area are aging and experiencing differing severities of stresses including alligator cracking, longitudinal cracking, and transverse cracking. Areas of isolated pavement settlement also exist throughout the project area. The Geotechnical Exploration Report, by Haugo Geotechnical Services in June 2019, can be provided upon request. Currently, there is not a storm sewer collection system within Hackamore Road. The existing roadway is a rural section road with ditches along a majority of the length of the roadway. Driveway culverts are present at existing driveway approaches to the road. Additionally, there are 4 culverts that convey drainage across the roadway. There are existing drainage issues that have been identified both by residents and engineering observation and analysis with 30% design. Specifically, there is a low point in the corridor to the west of Hackamore Circle. This drainage issue may involve working with adjacent property owners to determine if property is available for stormwater management. Other areas of concerns will be reviewed in more detail with 75% design. There are no existing sanitary sewer systems within Hackamore Road. There is an existing 8” PVC watermain section located along the south side of Hackamore in the boulevard between Hunter Drive and Bergamot Drive with a crossing to Corcoran at Bergamot Drive for use as an emergency interconnection. Existing traffic volume data for the primary intersections was collected based on traffic counts conducted the week of March 9, 2020. These counts were used as the existing baseline conditions for the area. The existing 2020 peak hour and average daily traffic (ADT) traffic counts for the corridor are shown on the attached figure in Appendix B and used for the traffic forecasting and operations analysis in this report. Traffic Forecasting Analysis In order to analyze the lane configuration and traffic control needs in the corridor, traffic forecasts were prepared for the twenty-year design (year 2040) condition, representing the full development of the area. 2040 traffic volumes were determined for the project by projecting the existing 2020 traffic counts to the 2040 design year. The projections included: · Background traffic growth of 1% / year. · Estimating the traffic volume from the current adjacent development that is yet to be completed. · Estimating the traffic volumes from proposed future development in the corridor. Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 11, 2020 Page 3 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final.docx The trip generation used to estimate the proposed area traffic is based on rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The projected 2040 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes, assuming full development of the area traffic, are shown on the attached figure in Appendix B. Traffic Operations Analysis The traffic operations analysis was completed by evaluating the existing and projected traffic operations for the Hackamore Road project area, including the intersections of: · Medina Lake Drive / Future Development Access · Foxberry Drive · Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) · Future Development Access · Hunter Road / Future Development Access · Bergamot Drive / Steeple Chase Lane · Proposed Development Access (Church) · Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) The intersections in the corridor were evaluated during the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro/SimTraffic micro simulation software. The results are derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The software was used to evaluate the characteristics of the roadway network including lane geometrics, turning movement volumes, traffic control, and signal timing. The results of the operations analysis is shown below in Table 2 for the Existing 2020 Conditions, 2040 without any improvements conditions, and 2040 with proposed improvements condition. Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 11, 2020 Page 4 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final.docx Table 2 – Level of Service and Delay Summary X (X) – Overall LOS or Delay (Worst Movement LOS or Delay) Control In t e r s e c t i o n Ex i s t i n g 2 0 2 0 Pr o j e c t e d 2 0 4 0 w i t h o u t Im p r o v e m e n t s Pr o j e c t e d 2 0 4 0 w i t h I m p r o v e m e n t s AM P e a k H o u r PM P e a k H o u r AM P e a k H o u r PM P e a k H o u r AM P e a k H o u r PM P e a k H o u r LO S De l a y (s e c / v e h ) LO S De l a y (s e c / v e h ) LO S De l a y (s e c / v e h ) LO S De l a y (s e c / v e h ) LO S De l a y (s e c / v e h ) LO S De l a y (s e c / v e h ) Thru- Stop Ha c k a m o r e R d a t Me d i n a L a k e D r / Fu t u r e A c c e s s A ( A ) 1 ( 2 ) A ( A ) 1 ( 2 ) A ( A ) 3 ( 9 ) A ( B ) 3 ( 1 1 ) A (A ) 2 ( 7 ) A ( A ) 3 ( 8 ) Thru- Stop Ha c k a m o r e R d a t Fo x b e r r y D r A ( A ) 1 ( 3 ) A ( A ) 1 ( 4 ) A ( A ) 1 ( 4 ) A ( A ) 2 ( 5 ) A ( A) 1 ( 3 ) A ( A ) 2 ( 4 ) Signal Ha c k a m o r e R d a t Pi n t o D r (C S A H 1 1 6 ) A ( B ) 6 ( 1 3 ) A ( B ) 9 ( 1 7 ) C ( D ) 2 1 ( 3 8 ) C ( D ) 2 3 ( 4 4) B ( C ) 1 0 ( 2 1 ) B ( C ) 1 5 ( 2 7 ) Thru- Stop Ha c k a m o r e R d a t Fu t u r e A c c e s s NA N A N A N A A ( A ) 3 ( 7 ) A ( A ) 4 ( 8 ) A ( A ) 2 ( 6 ) A ( A) 3 ( 6 ) Thru- Stop Ha c k a m o r e R d a t Hu n t e r R d / F u t u r e Ac c e s s A ( A ) 1 ( 4 ) A ( A ) 1 ( 4 ) A ( A ) 4 ( 8 ) A ( A ) 4 ( 9 ) A ( A) 2 ( 7 ) A ( A ) 2 ( 8 ) Thru- Stop Ha c k a m o r e R d a t Be r g a m o t D r / St e e p l e C h a s e L n A ( A ) 1 ( 5 ) A ( A ) 2 ( 7 ) A ( A ) 3 ( 9 ) A ( A ) 4 ( 9 ) A ( A) 2 ( 6 ) A ( A ) 2 ( 7 ) Thru- Stop Ha c k a m o r e R d a t Fu t u r e A c c e s s (C h u r c h ) NA N A N A N A A ( A ) 3 ( 7 ) A ( A ) 2 ( 6 ) A ( A ) 2 ( 5 ) A ( A) 1 ( 4 ) Signal Ha c k a m o r e R d a t Br o c k t o n L n (C S A H 1 0 1 ) B ( C 1 1 ( 2 2 ) B ( C ) 1 2 ( 2 1 ) C ( E ) 2 9 ( 5 6 ) C ( D ) 2 5 ( 47 ) B ( C ) 1 7 ( 2 8 ) B ( C ) 1 6 ( 2 6 ) Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 11, 2020 Page 5 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final.docx Turn Lane Analysis Based on the Forecasted 2040 traffic conditions a turn lane analysis was completed for the primary intersections in project area. The analysis was conducted to determine the turn lanes needed to accommodate the existing and future development on Hackamore Road. Criteria and guidance reviewed included: · MnDOT Road Design Manual · MnDOT Access Management Manual · MnDOT / LRRB (Local Road Research Board) Research Report 2008-14: Turn Lane Lengths for Various Speed Road and Evaluation of Determining Criteria · NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program) Report 457: Evaluating Intersection Improvements: An Engineering Study The full turn lane analysis report can be found in Appendix B and graphically shown in the project exhibits in Appendix A. Proposed Improvements Road Geometric Comparisons: Based on the traffic forecast and analysis, two geometric concept plans were developed based on a 40 MPH design speed that included the recommended geometric improvements, preliminary intersection control design, and right-of-way needs. Figures have been attached to this memo for reference. The proposed improvements, for both alternatives, would include roadway reclamation, subbase reconstruction, intersection improvements, and trail construction on the north side of Hackamore Road. The roadway would remain a predominately rural section. Curb and gutter is proposed for locations needing additional drainage direction, where the trail will be at the back of curb to decrease the overall roadway width, and at the intersections with CR 116 and CR 101. In general, Option 2 proposes more curb due to the proximity of the trail and to implement other impact-minimizing measures. · Option 1: This option is comprised of a continuous center left turn lane, right turn lanes at designated intersections, and one through lane in each direction. The trail location tends to deviate further away from the edge of roadway with a wider boulevard. · Option 2: The second option includes dedicated left and right turn lanes as necessary, and one through lane in each direction. The trail location is generally close to (with minimum boulevard) or abutting the edge of the roadway. With this option, any necessary widening of the roadway near Hackamore Circle to accommodate future development would be the responsibility of the developer. Hackamore Road is a designated State Aid roadway. The existing roadway alignment meets all horizontal curve requirements but does not meet the vertical curve requirements at the east end of the project on the westerly approach to CR 101 for a 40 MPH posted speed limit. In order to meet State Aid requirements, the proposed design would lengthen this vertical curve, which would require significant grading to lower the elevation by approximately 2-3 feet. The options are included with Figures 1A-F located in Appendix A for comparison. Trail Improvements: Currently, there are no pedestrian facilities along Hackamore Road. However, pedestrian facilities do exist in the northeast quadrant of the Brockton Lane N intersection extending to the north, and in the southwest quadrant of CR 116 extending to the south. Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 11, 2020 Page 6 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final.docx The proposed pedestrian improvements on Hackamore Road extend the full length of the project corridor from Medina Lake Drive to Brockton Lane N (CR 101) in both options. The proposed bituminous trail is 8-feet wide with a boulevard of varying width. Where the trail is adjacent to the roadway or at back of curb, the trail will be 10-feet wide. The use of retaining walls for the adjacent trail section maybe necessary if constructed, as shown in Option 2, due to the increase in side-slopes from this correction. The location of the proposed trail in Option 1 extends further north from Hackamore Road in the areas were adjacent development is planned and meanders through the adjacent properties. With this design, the trail could potentially be constructed as part of the site development at a time in the future. With this in mind, the construction of the pedestrian facilities would be delayed until the time that development occurs, but the cost of the trail would likely be included as a part of the overall development improvements. In Option 2, the trail is located adjacent to the roadway boulevard or at the back of curb throughout the corridor and would be constructed in conjunction with the roadway project. This option reduces impacts to adjacent properties and wetlands and would have more immediate pedestrian accessibility, however the cities would bear the cost of the trail with the project initially. The trail options shown in the exhibits for are interchangeable and could be constructed with either roadway option. With either trail option, crossing improvements would be installed at both CR 116 and CR 101, including push buttons on the signals and crosswalk markings. An uncontrolled pedestrian crossing is being considered between Hunter Drive and Bergamot Drive. The final determination of the crossing location will be made during final design in consideration of the location of the future development accesses to the south of Hackamore Road. East of the intersection between Hackamore Road and CR 101, trail improvements are shown on the north and south side of CR 47 (Hackamore Road). These trails are not included in the proposed improvement costs but are shown in the Figures for reference to indicate potential future connection points for the proposed trail on Hackamore Road. Intersection Improvements: In addition to the improvements on Hackamore Road, turn lane and intersection improvements are proposed on CR 116 and CR 101. Right turn lanes on CR 116 are proposed on the northbound and southbound directions to accommodate additional vehicular operations; additional northbound or southbound turn lanes on CR 101 are not proposed. Signal improvements at both Hennepin County intersections will be necessary due to the widening of Hackamore Road and the addition of improved pedestrian crossings. A second design option was developed at CR 116 which shifts the proposed intersection north to limit the impact to a significant wetland on the southeast quadrant of the roadway. The shift in alignment north also limits the impact to a large elevated transformer and provides space to accommodate the signal control panel at or near the existing location. Figure 3 showing these intersection alternatives can be found in Appendix A. Roadway reconstruction is also proposed for the CR 47 approach to Hackamore Road, east of CR 101, to accommodate the revised traffic pattern and turn lanes. The City of Plymouth is currently working on a larger CR 47 corridor study as a part of the future turn-back process with Hennepin County, which include improvements up to CR 101. Further refinement of this approach will be needed with 75% design to determine the most efficient way to accommodate the Hackamore Road improvements from the west to the east side of the intersection. Project Phasing: With both alignment options, the proposed street reconstruction is split into three phases. Phase 1 extends between CR 101 and the western boundary of the Steeple Chase Development (Ravinia), Phase 2 from the western boundary of the Steeple Chase Development to the western Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 11, 2020 Page 7 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final.docx boundary of 565 Hackamore Road, and Phase 3 from the western boundary of 565 Hackamore Road to Medina Lake Drive. Phase 1 was determined based on factors including condition of the roadway pavements, the deficient vertical curve near CR 101, and that most development has occurred within this portion of Hackamore Road. Development within Phase 2 and 3 is either in the early stages or has not proceeded fully. Therefore, the location of intersections and infrastructure needs are not fully known. Proposed Phase 1 construction would occur during the 2021 season, and Phase 2 and 3 would follow as early as the 2022 and 2024 construction seasons based on the progress of adjacent developments. Street/Pavement Section: Two 10-ton street sections were proposed within the geotechnical report previously completed by Haugo Geotechnical Services in 2019. The first recommended section consisted of 6 ½ inches of bituminous over 18 inches of aggregate base, the second section consisted of 6 inches of bituminous, 10 inches of aggregate base, and 18 inches of select granular borrow sub-base. Both meet the granular equivalency requirements for the project. For cost estimations at 30% design, the second section was used. This is the more costly option for street section, when compared to the section without a select granular borrow sub-base. During final design, either a combination of both sections (depending on the prevailing underlying soil conditions) or the first street section could be used to reduce the overall roadway costs of the project. The soil borings also indicated poor underlying soil conditions in numerous areas of the project. The resulting geotechnical analysis recommended removing these soils and replacing them with granular materials, which is included with the cost estimates. The full report can be provided upon request. Sanitary Sewer & Watermain: There are no sanitary sewer or watermain improvements proposed as part of this project. The City of Corcoran is planning a watermain looping connection as a separate project and will plan for a utility corridor with the Hackamore Project. Right-of-Way Considerations: Additional right-of-way will need to be acquired for the widening of Hackamore Road, as well as the installation of pedestrian facilities on the north side of the roadway. The right-of-way needed varies between the proposed design options, but in each case the width has been minimized through the alignment and location of the trail and boulevard widths. The figures in Appendix A also show the potential permanent right-of-way impacts. Stormwater Management & Floodplain Impacts: Storm sewer improvements will likely include a combination of ditch systems, storm piping systems within the curbed sections, and stormwater treatment areas to capture and retain storm sewer in accordance with the cities and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC). Impacts to the 100-yr floodplains are not anticipated with this project. This project will require an ECWMC permit. A pre-application meeting with held with ECWMC and the Cities of Medina and Corcoran on April 23, 2020, the minutes are included in Appendix D. In the meeting, stormwater best management practices (BMPs) were discussed. This project will trigger ECWMC stormwater management rules requiring rate and volume control off of the net increase of impervious surface. Due to limited right-of-way areas and the project’s phased approach, the cities discussed flexibility with BMP construction with the watershed. It is the Cities’ preference for adjacent developments to construct BMPs as they occur along the corridor. ECWMC was open to this idea. Additionally, it was discussed that the BMPs will be sized to capture and treat the net increase of impervious surface. While some BMPs may capture existing Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 11, 2020 Page 8 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final.docx and new impervious, some new impervious may not be able to be captured and treated prior to discharge from the site. ECWMC was amenable to this approach. It was discussed that an agreement may be drafted that would allow for timing flexibility for the cities to construct the BMPs in such case that development doesn’t occur as expected. Adjacent development on the north side of Hackamore Road in the City of Corcoran may provide a significant opportunity for the cities to share stormwater management BMP’s. This would all but eliminate the need to provide rate control or other large treatment areas in Phase 1 of the project within the Hackamore public right-of-way. Additionally, there is potential for adjacent development along the western portion of the corridor in Phase 2 and 3. These developments could construct their stormwater management systems to accommodate the road drainage. Rate control will be provided to manage runoff from the site improvements. The corridor has two main drainage areas. The first area drains to a ditch northwest of the intersection of Hackamore and CR116 the second area drains to a wetland southeast of the intersection of Hackamore and CR101. BMPs will be constructed to maintain runoff rates to these discharge points. Volume control of 1.1” off net new impervious surface will be provided within the constructed BMPs. Soils onsite are not conducive to infiltration so alternative sequencing practices will be provided to achieve the required retention volume. Permits/Approvals This project as proposed will result in disturbing more than one acre of underlying subgrade material, and therefore, a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit will be required. A permit from ECWMC will also be required for the stormwater management and erosion control aspects of this project. A permit from Hennepin County will also be needed for the work within the county right-of-way on both CR 101 and CR 116. If the cities propose to utilize State Aid funds, plan review and approval will also be required by MnDOT. Wetland impacts will occur as a result of the project. The project will require permitting through the Wetland Conservation Act, US Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Natural Resources, and ECWMC. Permit applications will be prepared after the 75% design is complete. Mitigation for wetland impacts will be required at a 2:1 ratio. The Board of Water and Soil Resources’ Local Road Replacement Program will be reviewed to determine if the project meets the requirements for replacement. For any impacts that do not meet the requirements, mitigation is recommended through the purchase of wetland credits as it is more cost-effective than onsite mitigation. In addition, there is little to no upland available within the existing right-of-way so onsite mitigation would need to be identified in an adjacent development. Private Utilities There are private utilities currently located within the proposed project area. Known utility owners include: · CenturyLink [Telephone] · Comcast [Internet/Television] · Wright Hennepin Coop [Communications] · CenterPoint Energy [Gas] · Xcel Energy [Gas/Electric] · Arvig [Fiber] · Mediacom [Fiber] · Zayo Group [Fiber] The roadway impacts to private utilities have been minimized to the greatest extent possible, but relocations will be necessary for utility poles and potentially some underground infrastructure. Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 11, 2020 Page 9 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final.docx Known utility owners have been notified of the proposed improvements. Once a final design alternative is selected, further coordination efforts will be conducted with 75% design. The utility relocations are primarily needed to meet the State Aid requirement of a minimum 10- foot clear zone, measured from the edge of the outside through-traffic lane; Hackamore Road is classified as a “Suburban Undivided” roadway. A significant number of utility poles and sections of the existing gas main at the edge of the existing roadway do not meet the current clear zone requirements and will be in direct conflict with the trail, roadway, or proposed clear zone. Between the two options, Option 2 has somewhat fewer utility impacts due to the narrower footprint of the roadway and the trail being located at the back of curb in more locations. For both options, utility poles will likely need to be relocated to the far side of the trail. Project Cost Estimates & Funding Opinion of Probable Cost: Detailed opinions of probable cost for both options can be found in Appendix C of this report. Each opinion of probable cost incorporates estimated 2021 construction costs and includes a 10% construction contingency factor. Indirect costs are projected at 25% of the construction cost and include engineering, legal, financing, and administrative costs. The table below provides a summary of the opinions of probable cost for the options under consideration. Table 3: Estimated Project Cost Summary Description Option 1 - Estimated Project Cost Option 2 - Estimated Project Cost Phase 1 Street Improvements $ 1,710,000.00 $ 1,519,000.00 Trail Improvements $ 221,000.00 $ 227,000.00 Wetland Mitigation $ 26,166.00 $ 11,430.00 Stormwater Management Improvements $ 367,000.00 $ 357,000.00 CR 47 Approach Improvements $ 387,000.00 $ 387,000.00 CR 101 Signal Improvements $ 505,000.00 $ 505,000.00 Sub-Total for Phase 1 $ 3,216,166.00 $ 3,006,430.00 Phase 2 & 3 Street Improvements $ 2,278,000.00 $ 2,012,000.00 Trail Improvements $ 256,000.00 $ 263,000.00 Wetland Mitigation $ 104,316.00 $ 71,394.00 Stormwater Management Improvements $ 481,000.00 $ 453,000.00 CR 116 Signal Improvements $ 505,000.00 $ 505,000.00 CR 116 North Turn Lanes Improvements $ 76,000.00 $ 76,000.00 CR 116 South Turn Lanes Improvements $ 83,000.00 $ 82,000.00 Sub-Total for Phase 2 & 3 $ 3,783,316.00 $ 3,462,394.00 Grand Total for Project $ 6,999,482.00 $ 6,468,824.00 Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 11, 2020 Page 10 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final.docx The above costs in Table 3 are estimated costs for roadway, storm sewer, stormwater improvements, and minor utility impacts for both alternatives. At this time, costs have not been reduced in consideration of the potential for adjacent development to share in the cost of trail and stormwater management improvements. The cost to obtain right-of-way for the proposed improvements were not included with the project estimates; in most cases it has been assumed that adjacent property owners would provide the necessary right-of-way with future development. With that said, there are locations along the corridor where right-of-way may need to be purchased from existing single-family owners to accommodate trail and stormwater improvements. Further refinement of the right-of-way costs will be determined at 75% design. The cost to mitigate disturbed wetland areas were also included where pertinent; it was assumed mitigation will occur through the purchase of wetland credits and not onsite mitigation. No contingency or overhead were included with the cost of the wetland credits. Potential Project Funding: Funding for the Hackamore Road improvements is proposed to come from a combination of City of Medina and City of Corcoran funds, State Aid funding, and cost sharing agreements. Special assessments to benefiting single-family property owners are not being proposed by either city at this time. Potential cost sharing agreement partners include Hennepin County for the work within the county road intersections and signals at CR 116 and CR 101. There is also a cost share opportunity for the portion of CR 47 east of CR 101 with Hennepin County, cities of Plymouth and Maple Grove. More in depth funding divisions will be determined during the 75% Design Phase based on cost sharing agreements and development progression. Community Engagement & Agency Coordination Meeting with Adjacent Cities & Hennepin County: City engineering staff met with the City of Plymouth, City of Maple Grove, and Hennepin County to discuss proposed improvements along Hackamore Road. The most critical portions of the project with respect to these agencies are the intersections at CR 116, CR 101, and that portion of CR 47 east of CR 101. Meeting minutes from these discussions can be found in Appendix D. Neighborhood Open House: A Virtual Open House meeting for adjacent property owners was held on May 19, 2020. Preliminary information was available to property owners regarding the concept plans and impacts associated with the project. Approximately 20 residents were in attendance, as well as council members in both cities, city staff from both the City of Medina and the City of Corcoran, and WSB engineering representatives. The primary feedback given related to the increased traffic potential, future development in the area, and drainage concerns. Mapping & Comment Activity: In order to gather input and engage the public on the Hackamore Road project, Social Pinpoint was used . The site includes an interactive map to compare the existing conditions, Option 1, and Option 2, as well as allows users the ability to add comments on the various options. The main feedback given centered around the additional turn lanes on Hackamore Road, (with residents both for and against the additional lane) drainage concerns, and the need to keep the green feel of the corridor. The comments from Social Pinpoint (to date) have been included in Appendix E. Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 11, 2020 Page 11 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final.docx Proposed Schedule The proposed project schedule is as follows: Complete 30% Level of Geometric Design ................................................................ Late May 2020 1st Set of City Council Meetings (June 11th Corcoran, June 16th Medina) ........................ June 2020 Begin 75% Design (Single Option, All Phases, Upon Authorization) ................ Mid/Late June 2020 Finalize 75% Design ............................................................................................. July/August 2020 2nd Set of City Council Meetings (Authorize Final Design of Phase 1) ......................... August 2020 Complete 100% Final Design (Phase 1) ..................................................................... January 2021 Project Bidding (Phase 1) ........................................................................................... February 2021 Phase 1 Construction Complete ........................................................................................ Fall 2021 Phase 2/3 Design ................................................................................................... As Early As 2022 Phase 2/3 Construction ......................................................................................... As Early As 2023 Summary and Recommendation The Hackamore Road Improvement Project includes roadway, stormwater, intersection, and pedestrian improvements from Medina Lake Drive to Brockton Lane N (CR 101). The existing roadway has been identified for improvements by both the City of Corcoran and the City of Medina due to the deteriorating pavement and the need to accommodate the additional traffic volumes due to development in the area. The project was not only initiated to address deteriorating and insufficient infrastructure, but also to develop a cohesive plan that both cities can provide to adjacent property owners and developers to guide the transportation needs, right- of-way, and pedestrian mobility. Two alternates for the roadway, trail, and intersection controls were developed for this 30% Roadway Design Memorandum. Option 1 is a three-lane design, with a center turn lane through the length of the project, as well as additional right turn lanes where warranted for the developments. This option has the benefit of a continuous center turn lane for left turns to facilitate the adjacent development traffic. However, the option has a larger footprint than the existing roadway, as well as a larger impact than Option 2. Option 1 provides more flexibility in designing around future intersections to accommodate development where access points may not be known at this time. Option 2 is a two-lane design, with right and left turn lanes where warranted at both existing and anticipated intersection locations with future development. This option has the benefit of a narrower street section in some locations with fewer adjacent impacts. However, the option has a more complicated footprint with left and right turn lanes only as needed, causing more shifts to the roadway and trail alignments. Both options will have potential wetland impacts, utility relocations, and right of way needs, but Option 2 minimizes these to a greater extent. Trail improvements are proposed on the north side of the roadway in both options. Option 1 has a meandering alignment extending beyond the right of way in many locations, where Option 2 is generally a roadside trail adjacent to Hackamore Road separated by a narrower boulevard or curb in most locations. The trail alignments shown in the exhibits are interchangeable and could be constructed with either roadway option. Based on the information provided in this memorandum and staff input from staff in both cities, it is our recommendation Option 2 be pursued for 75% design. This option is less costly, while maintaining beneficial corridor improvements to accommodate current and future traffic levels. Option 2 minimizes cost through decreasing the impervious surface, lowering the stormwater management needs, minimizing wetland impacts, while improving safety with dedicated turn lanes and pedestrian facilities in a similar manner as Option 1. Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 11, 2020 Page 12 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final.docx Proceeding with 75% design will provide the opportunity for the cities to refine costs, analyze funding mechanisms, and complete a cohesive plan guiding the transportation needs, right-of- way, and pedestrian mobility of this corridor. List of Figures and Appendices Appendix A – Concept Plans & Figures Figure 1A-F – Option 1/Option 2 Comparison Figure 2 – CR 116 Intersection Design Alternative Figure 3 – Project Phasing Plan Appendix B – Traffic Volume Figures and Turn Lane Analysis Appendix C – Opinion of Project Costs – Detailed Estimates Appendix D – Coordination Meeting Minutes Appendix E – Public Engagement Comments from Social Pinpoint Mapping Site F O X B E R R Y D R ME D I N A L A K E D R UG T UG T UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UG T UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT U G T U G T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T F/ O F/ O F/ O U G E U G E OHE OHE OHE OHE OHEOHEOHE UG E UG E UG E UG E UG E UG E STA 111+68.19, 0.00' FOXBERRY DRIVE STA 103+97.19, 0.00' RT MEDINA LAKE DRIVE 100+00 105+00 110+00 F O X B E R R Y D R ME D I N A L A K E D R UG T UG T UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UG T UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT U G T U G T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T F/ O F/ O F/ O U G E U G E OHE OHE OHE OHE OHEOHEOHE UG E UG E UG E UG E UG E UG E STA 111+68.19, 0.00' FOXBERRY DRIVE STA 103+97.19, 0.00' RT MEDINA LAKE DRIVE 100+00 105+00 110+00 HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: FIGURE DATE: NO.DATE BY CHK REVISION 015661-000 AS SHOWN GMD GMD JLS 06/02/2020 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% DESIGN CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPACTS OPTIONS 1 AND 2 1A SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 2 MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 1 3 + 0 0 SE E F I G U R E 1B MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 1 3 + 0 0 SE E F I G U R E 1B BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LEGEND BITUMINOUS TRAIL TURF BOULEVARD CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WETLAND IMPACTS PRELIMNARY PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMET NEEDS WETLAND BOUNDARY BMP 1 5234 SF BMP 1 5234 SF POTENTIAL FOR TRAIL TO BE INSTALLED BY ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT SIZED TO TREAT HACKAMORE ROAD RUNOFF. POTENTIAL TO SHARE STORMWATER TREATMENT WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SIZED TO TREAT HACKAMORE ROAD RUNOFF. POTENTIAL TO SHARE STORMWATER TREATMENT WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FU T U R E DE V E L O P M E N T CT Y R O A D 1 1 6 UGT UG T UGTUGT UGT UGT U G T UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T F/ O F/ O F/ O F/ O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OH E OH E UG E UG E UG E UG E UG E UG E STA 114+17.16, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 116 STA 121+63.93, 0.00' FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 115+00 120+00 125+00 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT PHASE 3 PHASE 2 FU T U R E DE V E L O P M E N T CT Y R O A D 1 1 6 UGT UG T UGTUGT UGT UGT U G T UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T F/ O F/ O F/ O F/ O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OH E OH E UG E UG E UG E UG E UG E UG E STA 114+17.16, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 116 STA 121+63.93, 0.00' FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 115+00 120+00 125+00 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT PHASE 3 PHASE 2 HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: FIGURE DATE: NO.DATE BY CHK REVISION 015661-000 AS SHOWN GMD GMD JLS 06/02/2020 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% DESIGN CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPACTS OPTIONS 1 AND 2 1B SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 2 MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 1 3 + 0 0 SE E F I G U R E 1A MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 2 8 + 0 0 SE E F I G U R E 1C MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 1 3 + 0 0 SE E F I G U R E 1A MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 2 8 + 0 0 SE E F I G U R E 1C BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LEGEND BITUMINOUS TRAIL TURF BOULEVARD CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WETLAND IMPACTS PRELIMNARY PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMET NEEDS WETLAND BOUNDARY CTY ROAD 116 SEE SHEET 1F CTY ROAD 116 SEE FIGURE 1F BMP 2 8268 SF BMP 2 8268 SF BMP 3N 3852 SF BMP 3S 9868 SF BMP 3N 3852 SF BMP 3S 9868 SF SIZED TO TREAT HACKAMORE ROAD RUNOFF. POTENTIAL TO SHARE STORMWATER TREATMENT WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SIZED TO TREAT HACKAMORE ROAD RUNOFF. POTENTIAL TO SHARE STORMWATER TREATMENT WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL FOR TRAIL TO BE INSTALLED BY ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL TO MOVE TRAIL CLOSER TO ROADWAY TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL HA C K A M O R E C I R HU N T E R R D UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UG T UG T UG T UG T UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O STA 136+86.43, 0.00' HUNTER ROAD STA 130+65.02, 0.00' HACKAMORE CIRCLE 130+00 135+00 140+00 PHASE 2 PHASE 1 HA C K A M O R E C I R HU N T E R R D UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UG T UG T UG T UG T UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O STA 136+86.43, 0.00' HUNTER ROAD STA 130+65.02, 0.00' HACKAMORE CIRCLE 130+00 135+00 140+00 PHASE 2 PHASE 1 HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: FIGURE DATE: NO.DATE BY CHK REVISION 015661-000 AS SHOWN GMD GMD JLS 06/02/2020 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% DESIGN CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPACTS OPTIONS 1 AND 2 1C SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 2 MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 2 8 + 0 0 SE E F I G U R E 1B MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 4 3 + 0 0 SE E F I G U R E 1D MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 2 8 + 0 0 SE E F I G U R E 1B MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 4 3 + 0 0 SE E F I G U R E 1D BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LEGEND BITUMINOUS TRAIL TURF BOULEVARD CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WETLAND IMPACTS PRELIMNARY PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMET NEEDS WETLAND BOUNDARY ST E E P L E C H A S E R D BE R G A M O T D R UGT UGT UGT UG T UG T UGTUGTUGT UG T UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O STA 145+25.03, 0.00' STEEPLE CHASE ROAD STA 145+12.85, 0.00' BERGAMOT DRIVE 145+00 150+00 155+00 REMOVE AND REPLA EXISTING CULVE ST E E P L E C H A S E R D BE R G A M O T D R UGT UGT UGT UG T UG T UGTUGTUGT UG T UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O STA 145+25.03, 0.00' STEEPLE CHASE ROAD STA 145+12.85, 0.00' BERGAMOT DRIVE 145+00 150+00 155+00 REMOVE AND REPLA EXISTING CULVE HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: FIGURE DATE: NO.DATE BY CHK REVISION 015661-000 AS SHOWN GMD GMD JLS 06/02/2020 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% DESIGN CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPACTS OPTIONS 1 AND 2 1D SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 2 MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 4 3 + 0 0 SE E F I G U R E 1C MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 5 8 + 0 0 SE E F I G U R E 1E MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 4 3 + 0 0 SE E F I G U R E 1C MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 5 8 + 0 0 SE E F I G U R E 1E BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LEGEND BITUMINOUS TRAIL TURF BOULEVARD CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WETLAND IMPACTS PRELIMNARY PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMET NEEDS WETLAND BOUNDARY BMP 4 11699 SF BMP 4 11699 SF SIZED TO TREAT HACKAMORE ROAD RUNOFF. POTENTIAL TO SHARE STORMWATER TREATMENT WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SIZED TO TREAT HACKAMORE ROAD RUNOFF. POTENTIAL TO SHARE STORMWATER TREATMENT WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT CT Y R O A D 1 0 1 UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O OH T OH T OH T OH T OHT OHT OHT OHT OHT OHT OHT OHT OHT OHT F/ O F/ O F/ O F/ O F/ O STA 167+14.88, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 101 160+00 165+00 170+00 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT CT Y R O A D 1 0 1 UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O OH T OH T OH T OH T OHT OHT OHT OHT OHT OHT OHT OHT OHT OHT F/ O F/ O F/ O F/ O F/ O STA 167+14.88, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 101 160+00 165+00 170+00 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: FIGURE DATE: NO.DATE BY CHK REVISION 015661-000 AS SHOWN GMD GMD JLS 06/02/2020 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% DESIGN CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPACTS OPTIONS 1 AND 2 1E SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 2 MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 5 8 + 0 0 SE E F I G U R E 1D MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 5 8 + 0 0 SE E F I G U R E 1D BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LEGEND BITUMINOUS TRAIL TURF BOULEVARD CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WETLAND IMPACTS PRELIMNARY PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMET NEEDS WETLAND BOUNDARY VERTICAL CURVE ADJUSTMENT VERTICAL CURVE ADJUSTMENT POTENTIAL RETAINING WALL WOULD REDUCE IMPACTS SHOWN POTENTIAL FOR TRAIL TO BE INSTALLED BY ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TRAIL BY OTHERS - SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY TRAIL BY OTHERS - SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY CTY ROAD 116 UG T UGT UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UGT UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGT UGT UGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/ O F/ O OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E UGE UGE UGE UG E UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE STA 114+17.16, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 116 11 5 + 0 0 CTY ROAD 116 UG T UGT UG T UG T UG T UG T UGT UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGT UGT UGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/ O F/ O F/ O OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E UGE UGE UGE UG E UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE STA 114+17.16, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 116 11 5 + 0 0 CTY ROAD 116 - OPTION 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: FIGURE DATE: NO.DATE BY CHK REVISION 015661-000 AS SHOWN GMD GMD JLS 06/02/2020 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% DESIGN CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPACTS OPTIONS 1 AND 2 1F SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N CTY ROAD 116 - OPTION 2 HACKAMORE ROAD SEE FIGURE 1B HACKAMORE ROAD SEE FIGURE 1A HACKAMORE ROAD SEE FIGURE 1B HACKAMORE ROAD SEE FIGURE 1A BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LEGEND BITUMINOUS TRAIL TURF BOULEVARD CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WETLAND IMPACTS PRELIMNARY PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMET NEEDS WETLAND BOUNDARY UG T UGT UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UGT UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGT UGT UGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/ O F/ O OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E UGE UGE UGE UG E UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE CTY ROAD 116 STA 114+17.16, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 116 11 5 + 0 0 UG T UGT UG T UG T UG T UG T UGT UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGT UGT UGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/ O F/ O F/ O OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E UGE UGE UGE UG E UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE CTY ROAD 116 STA 114+17.16, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 116 11 5 + 0 0 CTY ROAD 116 - OPTION 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: SHEET OF DATE: NO.DATE BY CHK REVISION 015661-000 AS SHOWN GMD GMD JLS 05/30/2020 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% DESIGN CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPACTS OPTIONS 1 AND 2 5 6 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N CTY ROAD 116 - OPTION 2 HACKAMORE ROAD SEE SHEET 2 MA T C H L I N E S T A : 1 5 8 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 4 HACKAMORE ROAD SEE SHEET 1 HACKAMORE ROAD SEE SHEET 2 HACKAMORE ROAD SEE SHEET 1 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LEGEND BITUMINOUS TRAIL BOULEVARD LANDSCAPING CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WETLAND IMPACTS RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMENT NEEDS WETLAND BOUNDARY 06/01/2020 F O X B E R R Y D R FU T U R E DE V E L O P M E N T ME D I N A L A K E D R CT Y R O A D 1 1 6 STA 111+68.19, 0.00' FOXBERRY DRIVE STA 103+97.19, 0.00' RT MEDINA LAKE DRIVE STA 114+17.16, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 116 STA 121+63.93, 0.00' FUTURE DEVELOPMENT HA C K A M O R E C I R HU N T E R R D STE E P L E C H A S E R D FU T U R E DE V E L O P M E N T BE R G A M O T D R STA 145+25.03, 0.00' STEEPLE CHASE ROAD STA 145+12.85, 0.00' BERGAMOT DRIVE STA 136+86.43, 0.00' HUNTER ROAD STA 130+65.02, 0.00' HACKAMORE CIRCLESTA 121+63.93, 0.00' FUTURE DEVELOPMENT STE E P L E C H A S E R D CT Y R O A D 1 0 1 BE R G A M O T D R STA 167+14.88, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 101 STA 145+25.03, 0.00' STEEPLE CHASE ROAD STA 145+12.85, 0.00' BERGAMOT DRIVE SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 100 200 N WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: FIGURE DATE: NO.DATE BY CHK REVISION 015661-000 AS SHOWN GMD GMD JLS 06/02/2020 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% DESIGN CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN PHASING 3 PHASE 1 LEGEND PHASE 2 PHASE 3 7 0 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | S U I T E 3 0 0 | M I N N E A P O L I S , M N | 55 4 1 6 | 7 6 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | W S B E N G . C O M Memorandum To: Project Management Team: Brad Martens, City Administrator, City of Corcoran Kevin Mattson, PE, Public Works Director, City of Corcoran Scott Johnson, City Administrator, City of Medina Dusty Finke, AICP, Planning Director, City of Medina Steve Scherer, Public Works Director, City of Medina Jim Stremel, PE, Project Manager, WSB Lydia Ener, PE, Project Engineer, WSB Heather Nelson, PE, Water Resources Engineer, WSB From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE, Traffic Engineer, WSB Date: April 17, 2020 Re: Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Cities of Medina and Corcoran WSB Project No. 015661-000 In conjunction with the detailed design of the Hackamore Road improvement project (Medina Lake Drive to Brockton Lane) the location of turn lanes at intersections and access locations were analyzed. As part of the analysis, criteria were reviewed to guide the identification of locations where it may be appropriate to construct dedicated right or left turn lanes. There are several sources that can be used to determine the need for turn lanes. Recommendations from guidance documents were reviewed including: • MnDOT Road Design Manual • MnDOT Access Management Manual • MnDOT/LRRB (Local Road Research Board) Research Report 2008-14: Turn Lane Lengths for Various Speed Road and Evaluation of Determining Criteria • NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program) Report 457: Evaluating Intersection Improvements: An Engineering Study The analysis provides for implementing turn lanes in a way to improve the safety of uncontrolled intersection movements by removing the turning traffic from the through lane. Turn lanes should be added to any design where suitable space, right-of-way, and finances are available for construction. The primary input for analyzing the need for turn lanes is the traffic conditions at each specific intersection within the corridor. For the Hackamore Road Improvement project future year traffic conditions were determined by projecting the existing 2020 traffic counts to the year 2040 by including a background traffic growth of 1%/year and estimating the traffic volume from the current adjacent development that is yet to be completed and adjacent future development. The projected 2040 AM and PM peak hour volumes, assuming full development of the area traffic, are shown on the attached figure. The following sections provides a summary of each guidance document indicated above as well as the recommended locations for turn lanes at each intersection in the Hackamore Road corridor. Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 2 MnDOT Road Design Manual: The MnDOT Road Design Manual includes the following guidance for the location of turn lanes: • In urban areas, right- and left-turn lanes should be considered whenever construction is economically feasible. • In urban areas, for preservation projects, left-turn lanes should be provided if feasible at nonpublic access locations generating high traffic volumes, at locations where crash locations confirm the existence of a hazard, and at locations determined by the District Traffic Engineer in consideration of crashes, capacity and traffic volumes. • In urban areas, for preservation projects, right-turn lanes should, if feasible, be provided at all public road intersections and other locations as determined by the District Traffic Engineer in consideration of crashes, capacity and traffic volumes. • Continuous left-turn lanes for urban areas have no rigid design criteria – but generally should be considered in the following: when shifting from rural to suburban or urban areas; generally used with lower speeds; volumes should not be excessive for the facility type; center turn lane should generally be 14 feet wide; if the roadway is being reconstructed, realign opposite side driveway entrances if feasible; and pavement markings should be developed by the District Traffic Engineer. • Continuous right-turn lanes may be considered in locations where driveways are closely spaced. They should not be longer than a quarter of a mile and speeds must be greater than 30 miles per hour, with heavier volumes and high turning demands. • In rural areas, right-turn lanes should be considered when the projected ADT is over 1,500, the design speed is 45 miles per hour or higher at all public road access points; if industrial, commercial or substantial trip generating land use is to be served; or if the access serves more than 10 residential units. • In rural areas, left-turn lanes should be provided when the access is to a public road, an industrial tract or a commercial center. • In rural areas, if a left-turn lane is not warranted or if the construction of a left-turn lane is not practical (due to right of way, environmental constraints, etc.), a bypass should be considered. Preferably only at “T” intersections. Four-legged intersections should only consider a bypass lane after all other solutions have been found impractical and the cross-street volume is low. As can be seen from the information above, the MnDOT Road Design Manual is conservative with regard to the construction of dedicated right or left-turn lane construction. Guidance from this document suggests that turn lanes should be constructed at all public streets in rural areas, along with selected locations for commercial, residential and industrial uses. In urban areas they are to be considered whenever feasible. MnDOT Access Management Manual: The MnDOT Access Management Manual is less conservative than the MnDOT Road Design Manual and identifies higher thresholds on the need for dedicated turn lanes. Highlights from the MnDOT Access Management Manual are listed below: Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 3 • Right-turn treatment versus a right-turn lane: the guidelines indicate that a right-turn lane may not be needed if a right-turn treatment can be provided (widening of the shoulder, removing conflicting striping and shoulder rumble strips, prohibiting on street parking in urban areas and/or adding pavement thickness to the shoulder) instead. • Turn lanes should be provided at public street connections and driveways in accordance with the MnDOT Road Design Manual – Section 5-3. • Turn lane warrants for undivided highways: o Warrant 1: Passing lane/climbing lane – at high volume driveways (>100 trips per day) and all public street connections located on highway segments where passing lanes or climbing lanes are present in the approach direction. o Warrant 2: Limited sight distance/terrain – at all driveways and public street connections with inadequate stopping sight distance or located on short vertical curves or steep grades. o Warrant 3: Railroad crossings – at high volume driveways (>100 trips per day) and all public street connections where a railroad is parallel to the highway and where the potential exists for vehicles delayed by a train to back up into the through lanes of the highway, creating both safety and operational problems. o Warrant 4: Signalized intersections – at all signalized public street connections and driveways. o Warrant 5: Heavy-vehicle traffic – at all driveways and public street connections high-speed highways (posted speed ≥45 mph) where the heavy- vehicle turning volume is 15 or more vehicles per hour for at least eight hours a day for four months or more per year. o Warrant 6: School entrances – at public and private school driveways on high- speed highways used by school traffic. o Warrant 7: Crash history – at high-volume driveways (>100 trips per day) and all public street connections that demonstrate a history of crashes of the type suitable to correction by a turn lane or turn-lane treatment, or where adequate trial of other remedies has failed to reduce crash frequency. o Warrant 8: Corridor crash experience – on highway corridors that demonstrate a history of similar crash types suitable to correction by providing corridor -wide consistency in turn-lane use. o Warrant 9: Vehicular volumes – at high-volume driveways (>100 trips per day) and all public street connections on high-speed highways (posted speeds ≥45 mph) that satisfy the following: Highway AADT one year after opening; posted speed of 45 mph or higher 2-Lane Highway (AADT) Cross Street/Driveway (ADT) Turn Lane Requirement > 1,500 >100 Right-turn lane warranted 1,500 – 2,999 >1,500 Left-turn lane warranted 3,000 – 3,999 >1,200 Left-turn lane warranted 4,000 to 4,999 >1,000 Left-turn lane warranted 5,000 to 6,499 >800 Left-turn lane warranted >6,500 101 – 400 Left-turn lane or bypass lane >6,500 >400 Left-turn lane warranted Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 4 Under the warrant analysis outlined in the MnDOT Access Management Manual, right-turn lanes would be recommended at all public street locations as well as private driveways that generate 100 trips or more per day. This is generally consistent with the MnDOT Road Design Manual. However, the construction of left-turn lanes outlined by the MnDOT Access Management Manual would require most side street cross volumes to be significantly higher than they currently are on Hackamore Road in order to construct a dedicated turn lane. This varies from the MnDOT Road Design Manual, which would indicate that in rural areas, left-turn lanes should be provided at all public streets – regardless of volumes – if they are feasible to construct. MnDOT/LRRB (Local Road Research Board) Research Report 2008-14: Turn Lane Lengths for Various Speed Road and Evaluation of Determining Criteria: Although this document discusses more on turn lane lengths , it does outline several criteria for turn lane warrants, including those found in the MnDOT Road Design Manual and the MnDOT Traffic Engineering Manual. The MnDOT Road Design Manual criteria was discussed above. The criteria outlined in the MnDOT 1999 Traffic Engineering Manual provides figures based on the roadway speed limit and design hour volumes. The figures below represent the criteria outlined for left turn lanes with major roadway speed of 40-45mph and for right turn lanes. Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 5 Applying this criterion would represent the most conservative approach for implementation of left turn lanes. All left turn movements on Hackamore Road except the following would meet the volume requirements for a dedicated lane: • Maple Lake Drive Westbound • Foxberry Drive Westbound • Future Street east of Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) Eastbound • Hackamore Circle Eastbound • Hunter Road/Future Street Eastbound • Steeple Chase Lane/Bergamot Drive Westbound For right turn lanes this criterion is not as conservative as that outline in the MnDOT Road Design Manual or MnDOT Access Management Manual which would recommend a right turn lane at every intersection that has more than 100 trips per day. Applying the above criterion right turn movements would meet the volume requirements for a dedicated lane except at the following Hackamore Road approaches: • Maple Lake Drive Eastbound • Foxberry Drive Eastbound • Hackamore Circle Westbound • Hunter Road/Future Street Eastbound • Steeple Chase Lane/Bergamot Drive Eastbound NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program) Report 457: Evaluating Intersection Improvements: An Engineering Study: Guidance from the NCHRP Report indicate the following should be used to determine when to provide a left turn lane: • A left turn lane should be considered at any median crossover on divided, high speed road. • A left turn lane should be provided on the unstopped approach of a high-speed rural highway when it intersection with other arterial or collectors. • A left turn lane is recommended on the unstopped approach of any intersection when the combination of the intersection volumes intersect above or to the right of the appropriate trend line shown in the associated figures based on speed on the major roadway. The NCHRP Report also develop guidance for the need for right turn lanes based on operating and collision costs compared to the cost of constructing a right turn lane. The figures below show the turn lane criteria for two-lane roadways with a 40mph speed limit. Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 6 The above guidance represents the most stringent criteria for installation of right and left turn lanes. By applying this criteria, the only turn lanes that would be warranted on Hackamore Road is the eastbound left turn and westbound right turn at the Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) intersection. The other movements that meet the warrants are: • Pinto (CSAH 116) Northbound Right • Pinto (CSAH 116) Northbound Left • Pinto (CSAH 116) Southbound Left • Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Northbound Right • Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Northbound Left • Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Southbound Left Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 7 Turn Lane Recommendations Based on review of each intersection in the Hackamore Road corridor using the above criteria and engineering judgement the following locations for left and right turn lanes should be considered. While these turn lane locations provides for a more conservative recommendation, it will provide for the safest and most efficient roadway system. Maple Lake Drive/Future Street (to north): Eastbound Left turn lane to the Future Street Westbound Right turn lane to the Future Street Foxberry Drive: No Turn Lanes Pinto Drive (CSAH 116): Eastbound Left turn lane to Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) Eastbound Right turn lane to Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) Westbound Left turn lane to Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) Westbound Right turn lane to Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) Northbound Left turn lane to Hackamore Road Northbound Right turn lane to Hackamore Road Southbound Left turn lane to Hackamore Road Southbound Right turn lane to Hackamore Road Future Street (to north): Westbound Right turn lane to Future Street Hackamore Circle: No Turn Lanes Hunter Road/Future Street (to south): Westbound Left turn lane to Hunter Road Westbound Right turn lane to Hunter Road Steeple Chase Lane/Bergamot Drive: Eastbound Left turn lane to Steeple Chase Lane Westbound Right turn lane to Steeple Chase Lane Church Entrance (to north): Eastbound Left turn lane to Church Entrance Westbound Right turn lane to Church Entrance Brockton Lane (CSAH 101): Eastbound Left turn lane to Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Eastbound Right turn lane to Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Westbound Left turn lane to Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Westbound Right turn lane to Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Northbound Left turn lane to Hackamore Road Northbound Right turn lane to Hackamore Road Southbound Left turn lane to Hackamore Road Southbound Right turn lane to Hackamore Road 2040 Traffic Volumes LEGEND XX(XX) AM(PM) Forecast Peak Hour Movements 248 Assumed Build Lane Configuration Traffic Signal Traffic Sign Hackamore Rd Br o c k o n L n Pi n t o D r Hu n t e r R d Be r g a m o t D r Me d i n a L a k e D r Fo x b e r r y D r Fu t u r e A c c e s s W e s t 18 ( 1 0 ) 0 ( 0 ) 24 ( 1 5 ) 21 (56) p s 8 (25) j (19) 6 2 (11) x 0 m (1 ) 0 (0 ) 0 (9 ) 1 0 (66) 94 (0) 0 d 31 (95) 1 (6) - m (0 ) 0 (4 ) 1 8 (93) 125 (0) 0 Fu t u r e Ac c e s s E a s t 5 ( 5 ) 0 ( 0 ) 27 ( 9 ) p (16) 8 10 (22)k s f 12 (30) x 0 144 (213) (9) 4 m (1 0 ) 1 2 (0 ) 0 (1 6 ) 2 6 (188) 219 0 ( 1 ) 43 ( 3 3 ) 25 (37)k 0 (4) 13 ( 4 ) x 4 104 (227) p s f (15) 11 m (1 ) 1 (4 ) 0 (1 ) 4 (205) 245 (2) 2 74 (155) i r w s 170 (145) 4 1 ( 2 9 ) 5 7 0 ( 2 5 7 ) 1 2 2 ( 4 1 ) k 26 (82) f x 2 4 8(44) 32 v (8 1 ) 2 9 (5 9 8 ) 1 6 3 (1 8 3 ) 1 9 8 (154) 212 ,(36) 61 Hackamore Road Traffic Analysis Medina and Corcoran, MN (42) 77 ,(25) 45 (29) 23 v (3 5 ) 2 (6 9 1 ) 1 1 7 (1 3 7 ) 6 8 89 (59) x 2 7 18 (47) 29 (70) f k 68 ( 4 1 ) w s 11 ( 2 0 ) 59 2 ( 1 6 1 ) u (13) 10 v(207) 203 x 16 (26) 2 2 ( 1 6 ) k f 151 (202)1 0 ( 8 ) [ 2020 Traffic Volumes Hackamore Road Traffic Analysis Medina and Corcoran, MN LEGEND XX(XX) AM(PM) Existing Peak Hour Movements 248 Lane Configuration Traffic Signal Traffic Sign Hackamore Rd Br o c k o n L n Pi n t o D r Hu n t e r R d Be r g a m o t D r Me d i n a L a k e D r Fo x b e r r y D r m (1 ) 0 (7 ) 8 (54) 77 (0) 0 2 (9) - d 17 (46) m (0 ) 0 (3 ) 1 5 (64) 83 (0) 0 1 (5) - d 19 (57) (7) 3 c(112) 143 j 85 (127) 8 (18) 4 ( 4 ) 22 ( 7 ) [ (6) 5 / (1 ) 1 (3 ) 0 (1 ) 3 (133) 147 (2) 2 4 57 (125) p d 14 (18)k 0 (3) 0 ( 1 ) 23 ( 1 7 ) 4 ( 0 ) (27) 13 / (4 2 ) 1 2 (4 9 0 ) 1 3 4 (1 5 0 ) 1 6 2 (106) 143 (14) 28 2 4 8 44 (93) i r w 139 (119) 2 7 ( 1 0 ) 4 6 7 ( 2 1 1 ) 1 0 0 ( 3 4 ) 21 (67) ; 8 ( 1 4 ) 48 5 ( 1 3 2 ) u 48 ( 2 1 ) w 10 (24) 14 (51) ; (22) 17 ? (2 5 ) 1 (5 6 6 ) 9 6 (9 4 ) 4 4 58 (37) 2 7 (25) 48 (19) 34 2040 Traffic Volumes LEGEND XX(XX) AM(PM) Forecast Peak Hour Movements 248 Assumed Build Lane Configuration Traffic Signal Traffic Sign Hackamore Rd Br o c k o n L n Pi n t o D r Hu n t e r R d Be r g a m o t D r Me d i n a L a k e D r Fo x b e r r y D r Fu t u r e A c c e s s W e s t 18 ( 1 0 ) 0 ( 0 ) 24 ( 1 5 ) 21 (56) p s 8 (25) j (19) 6 2 (11) x 0 m (1 ) 0 (0 ) 0 (9 ) 1 0 (66) 94 (0) 0 d 31 (95) 1 (6) - m (0 ) 0 (4 ) 1 8 (93) 125 (0) 0 Fu t u r e Ac c e s s E a s t 5 ( 5 ) 0 ( 0 ) 27 ( 9 ) p (16) 8 10 (22)k s f 12 (30) x 0 144 (213) (9) 4 m (1 0 ) 1 2 (0 ) 0 (1 6 ) 2 6 (188) 219 0 ( 1 ) 43 ( 3 3 ) 25 (37)k 0 (4) 13 ( 4 ) x 4 104 (227) p s f (15) 11 m (1 ) 1 (4 ) 0 (1 ) 4 (205) 245 (2) 2 74 (155) i r w s 170 (145) 4 1 ( 2 9 ) 5 7 0 ( 2 5 7 ) 1 2 2 ( 4 1 ) k 26 (82) f x 2 4 8(44) 32 v (8 1 ) 2 9 (5 9 8 ) 1 6 3 (1 8 3 ) 1 9 8 (154) 212 ,(36) 61 Hackamore Road Traffic Analysis Medina and Corcoran, MN (42) 77 ,(25) 45 (29) 23 v (3 5 ) 2 (6 9 1 ) 1 1 7 (1 3 7 ) 6 8 89 (59) x 2 7 18 (47) 29 (70) f k 68 ( 4 1 ) w s 11 ( 2 0 ) 59 2 ( 1 6 1 ) u (13) 10 v(207) 203 x 16 (26) 2 2 ( 1 6 ) k f 151 (202)1 0 ( 8 ) [ WSB Project:Hackamore Drive Option 1 Design By:LME Project Location:Medina, MN Checked By:JLS City Project No.: WSB Project No:015661-00 Date:6/3/2020 Item No. MnDOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 58,400.00$ 58,400.00$ 2 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.2 20,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 3 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.2 15,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 4 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 676.0 3.00$ 2,028.00$ 5 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 250.0 5.00$ 1,250.00$ 6 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 250.0 7.00$ 1,750.00$ 7 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 150.0 3.00$ 450.00$ 8 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 14324 2.50$ 35,810.00$ 9 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 4950 8.00$ 39,600.00$ 10 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 3504 8.00$ 28,032.00$ 11 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 7878 16.00$ 126,048.00$ 12 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 8595 24.00$ 206,280.00$ 13 2106.507 EXCAVATION - MUCK C Y 954 24.00$ 22,896.00$ 14 2106.507 GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 954 24.00$ 22,896.00$ 15 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 27 300.00$ 8,100.00$ 16 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM HOUR 25 175.00$ 4,375.00$ 17 2131.506 CALCIUM CHLORIDE SOLUTION GAL 1723 3.00$ 5,169.00$ 18 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 1982 30.00$ 59,460.00$ 19 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION S Y 6078.0 3.00$ 18,234.00$ 20 2231.603 BITUMINOUS RAMPING LF 1310 1.25$ 1,637.50$ 21 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 717 5.00$ 3,585.00$ 22 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 2125 86.00$ 182,750.00$ 23 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 2975 84.00$ 249,900.00$ 24 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - 3.0" THICK S Y 263 50.00$ 13,150.00$ 25 2502.541 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 250 15.00$ 3,750.00$ 26 2502.602 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 3 550.00$ 1,650.00$ 27 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 622 16.00$ 9,952.00$ 28 2531.504 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY S Y 250 60.00$ 15,000.00$ 29 2545.601 RELOCATE UTILITY L S 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 30 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S 1 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 31 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 32 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 33 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 34 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 10 250.00$ 2,500.00$ 35 2573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS L F 2000 2.50$ 5,000.00$ 36 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER L F 2000 2.50$ 5,000.00$ 37 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE ROCK L F 500 8.00$ 4,000.00$ 38 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 321 30.00$ 9,630.00$ 39 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 500 2.50$ 1,250.00$ 40 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 2912 1.25$ 3,640.00$ 41 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 106 5.00$ 530.00$ 42 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 1249.00 8.00$ 9,992.00$ 43 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 1.30 4,000.00$ 5,200.00$ 44 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 5240 1.00$ 5,240.00$ 45 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 50 2.00$ 100.00$ 46 2582.503 DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAINT L F 2620 1.00$ 2,620.00$ 46 2582.518 CROSSWALK MSSG PAINT S F 216 3.50$ 756.00$ 47 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 72 4.00$ 288.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 1,225,098.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 122,509.85$ SUBTOTAL 1,347,608.35$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 336,902.09$ TOTAL 1,685,000.00$ WETLAND MITIGATION COST 26,166.00$ A. Roadway Costs - Hackamore Phase 1 OPINION OF PROBABLE COST 48 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 7,700.00$ 7,700.00$ 49 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.1 20,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 50 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.1 15,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 51 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 1288 8.00$ 10,304.00$ 52 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 548 8.00$ 4,384.00$ 53 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 470 30.00$ 14,100.00$ 54 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - TRAIL S Y 2575 30.00$ 77,250.00$ 55 2531.504 6" CONCRETE WALK S F 400 10.00$ 4,000.00$ 56 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F 64 50.00$ 3,200.00$ 57 2540.618 RETAINING WALL S F 375 75.00$ 28,125.00$ 58 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 161 30.00$ 4,830.00$ 59 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 1456 1.25$ 1,820.00$ 60 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 34 5.00$ 170.00$ 61 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 0.4 4,000.00$ 1,600.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 160,983.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 16,098.30$ SUBTOTAL 177,081.30$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 44,270.33$ TOTAL 221,000.00$ 62 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 10,500.00$ 10,500.00$ 63 2105.601 DEWATERING L S 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 64 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 4)L S 1 88,800.00$ 88,800.00$ 65 2130.610 UTILITY CREW HOUR 8 800.00$ 6,400.00$ 66 2451.607 PIPE BEDDING MATERIAL C Y 28 16.00$ 448.00$ 67 2501.502 18" PIPE APRON EACH 4 300.00$ 1,200.00$ 68 2501.502 24" PIPE APRON EACH 4 500.00$ 2,000.00$ 69 2501.503 18" PIPE CULVERT L F 60 65.00$ 3,900.00$ 70 2501.503 24" PIPE CULVERT L F 72 85.00$ 6,120.00$ 71 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 300 60.00$ 18,000.00$ 72 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 500 70.00$ 35,000.00$ 73 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 144 90.00$ 12,960.00$ 74 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM)EACH 5 750.00$ 3,750.00$ 75 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 L F 24 500.00$ 12,000.00$ 76 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 60-4020 L F 6 600.00$ 3,600.00$ 77 2506.602 CONST DRAINATE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (2'X3') EACH 6 2,500.00$ 15,000.00$ 78 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III C Y 28 100.00$ 2,800.00$ 79 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS IV C Y 48 150.00$ 7,200.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 231,678.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (25%) 57,919.50$ SUBTOTAL 289,597.50$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (0%) 72,399.38$ TOTAL 362,000.00$ C. Storm Costs - Hackamore Phase 1 B. Trail Costs - Hackamore Phase 1 80 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 78,700.00$ 78,700.00$ 81 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.3 20,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 82 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.3 15,000.00$ 4,500.00$ 83 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 972.0 3.00$ 2,916.00$ 84 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 250.0 5.00$ 1,250.00$ 85 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 250.0 7.00$ 1,750.00$ 86 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 150.0 3.00$ 450.00$ 87 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 20612 2.50$ 51,530.00$ 88 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 7123 8.00$ 56,984.00$ 89 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 5042 8.00$ 40,336.00$ 90 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 11337 16.00$ 181,392.00$ 91 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 12368 24.00$ 296,832.00$ 92 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 38 300.00$ 11,400.00$ 93 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM HOUR 25 175.00$ 4,375.00$ 94 2131.506 CALCIUM CHLORIDE SOLUTION GAL 2480 3.00$ 7,440.00$ 95 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 2852 30.00$ 85,560.00$ 96 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION S Y 8746.0 3.00$ 26,238.00$ 97 2231.603 BITUMINOUS RAMPING LF 1855 1.25$ 2,318.75$ 98 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 1031 5.00$ 5,155.00$ 99 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 3057 86.00$ 262,902.00$ 100 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 4280 84.00$ 359,520.00$ 101 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - 3.0" THICK S Y 263 50.00$ 13,150.00$ 102 2502.541 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 250 15.00$ 3,750.00$ 103 2502.602 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 3 550.00$ 1,650.00$ 104 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 1206 16.00$ 19,296.00$ 105 2531.504 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY S Y 250 60.00$ 15,000.00$ 106 2545.601 RELOCATE UTILITY L S 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 107 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S 1 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 108 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 109 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 110 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 111 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 10 250.00$ 2,500.00$ 112 2573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS L F 2000 2.50$ 5,000.00$ 113 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER L F 2000 2.50$ 5,000.00$ 114 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE ROCK L F 500 8.00$ 4,000.00$ 115 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 454 30.00$ 13,620.00$ 116 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 500 2.50$ 1,250.00$ 117 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 4123 1.25$ 5,153.75$ 118 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 150 5.00$ 750.00$ 119 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 1769.00 8.00$ 14,152.00$ 120 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 1.8 4,000.00$ 7,200.00$ 121 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 7420 1.00$ 7,420.00$ 122 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 50 2.00$ 100.00$ 123 2582.503 DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAINT L F 3710 1.00$ 3,710.00$ 123 2582.518 CROSSWALK MSSG PAINT S F 216 3.50$ 756.00$ 124 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 72 4.00$ 288.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 1,651,494.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 165,149.45$ SUBTOTAL 1,816,643.95$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 454,160.99$ TOTAL 2,271,000.00$ WETLAND MITIGATION COST 104,316.00$ 125 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 8,900.00$ 8,900.00$ 126 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.1 20,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 127 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.1 15,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 128 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 1853 8.00$ 14,824.00$ 129 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 789 8.00$ 6,312.00$ 130 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 677 30.00$ 20,310.00$ 131 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - TRAIL S Y 3706 30.00$ 111,180.00$ 132 2531.504 6" CONCRETE WALK S F 400 10.00$ 4,000.00$ 133 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F 64 50.00$ 3,200.00$ 134 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 227 30.00$ 6,810.00$ 135 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 2062 1.25$ 2,577.50$ 136 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 47 5.00$ 235.00$ 137 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 1 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 185,848.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 18,584.85$ SUBTOTAL 204,433.35$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 51,108.34$ TOTAL 256,000.00$ D. Roadway Costs - Hackamore Phase 2 & 3 E. Trail Costs - Hackamore Phase 2 & 3 138 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 5,300.00$ 5,300.00$ 139 2105.601 DEWATERING L S 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 140 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 1)L S 1 -$ -$ 141 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 2)L S 1 41,200.00$ 41,200.00$ 142 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 3N)L S 1 58,500.00$ 58,500.00$ 143 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 3S)L S 1 55,900.00$ 55,900.00$ 144 2130.610 UTILITY CREW HOUR 8 800.00$ 6,400.00$ 145 2451.607 PIPE BEDDING MATERIAL C Y 42 16.00$ 672.00$ 146 2501.502 18" PIPE APRON EACH 10 300.00$ 3,000.00$ 147 2501.502 24" PIPE APRON EACH 2 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 148 2501.503 18" PIPE CULVERT L F 150 65.00$ 9,750.00$ 149 2501.503 24" PIPE CULVERT L F 36 85.00$ 3,060.00$ 150 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 300 60.00$ 18,000.00$ 151 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 500 70.00$ 35,000.00$ 152 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 144 90.00$ 12,960.00$ 153 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM)EACH 4 750.00$ 3,000.00$ 154 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 L F 24 500.00$ 12,000.00$ 155 2506.602 CONST DRAINATE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (2'X3') EACH 8 2,500.00$ 20,000.00$ 156 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III C Y 70 100.00$ 7,000.00$ 157 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS IV C Y 24 150.00$ 3,600.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 298,342.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (25%) 74,585.50$ SUBTOTAL 372,927.50$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 93,231.88$ TOTAL 466,000.00$ 158 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 17,500.00$ 17,500.00$ 159 2565.601 SIGNAL SYSTEM LS 1 350,000.00$ 350,000.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 367,500.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 36,750.00$ SUBTOTAL 404,250.00$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 101,062.50$ TOTAL 505,000.00$ 160 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 2,600.00$ 2,600.00$ 161 2231.604 BITUMINOUS PATCHING S Y 167 150.00$ 25,050.00$ 162 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 350.0 3.00$ 1,050.00$ 163 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 211 2.50$ 527.50$ 164 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 58 12.00$ 696.00$ 165 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 78 12.00$ 936.00$ 166 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 116 16.00$ 1,856.00$ 167 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 127 36.00$ 4,572.00$ 168 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 1 600.00$ 600.00$ 169 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 55 40.00$ 2,200.00$ 170 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 11 5.00$ 55.00$ 171 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 19 120.00$ 2,280.00$ 172 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 26 118.00$ 3,068.00$ 173 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 174 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 175 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 40 35.00$ 1,400.00$ 176 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 84 3.50$ 294.00$ 177 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 84 2.00$ 168.00$ 178 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 9 5.00$ 45.00$ 179 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 36.0 12.00$ 432.00$ 180 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 0.1 4,000.00$ 400.00$ 181 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 450 2.00$ 900.00$ 182 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 24 4.00$ 96.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 53,425.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 5,342.55$ SUBTOTAL 58,768.05$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 14,692.01$ TOTAL 73,000.00$ G1. Intersection Costs - CR 116 Signal F. Storm Costs - Hackamore Phase 2 & 3 G2. Intersection Costs - CR 116 North Turn Lanes 183 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 2,800.00$ 2,800.00$ 184 2231.604 BITUMINOUS PATCHING S Y 167 150.00$ 25,050.00$ 185 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 350.0 3.00$ 1,050.00$ 186 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 265 2.50$ 662.50$ 187 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 73 12.00$ 876.00$ 188 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 97 12.00$ 1,164.00$ 189 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 146 16.00$ 2,336.00$ 190 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 159 36.00$ 5,724.00$ 191 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 1 600.00$ 600.00$ 192 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 68 40.00$ 2,720.00$ 193 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 14 5.00$ 70.00$ 194 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 24 120.00$ 2,880.00$ 195 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 32 118.00$ 3,776.00$ 196 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 197 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 198 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 40 35.00$ 1,400.00$ 199 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 84 3.50$ 294.00$ 200 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 84 2.00$ 168.00$ 201 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 9 5.00$ 45.00$ 202 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 36.0 12.00$ 432.00$ 203 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 0.1 4,000.00$ 400.00$ 204 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 450 2.00$ 900.00$ 205 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 24 4.00$ 96.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 57,643.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 5,764.35$ SUBTOTAL 63,407.85$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 15,851.96$ TOTAL 79,000.00$ 206 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 17,500.00$ 17,500.00$ 207 2565.601 SIGNAL SYSTEM LS 1 350,000.00$ 350,000.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 367,500.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 36,750.00$ SUBTOTAL 404,250.00$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 101,062.50$ TOTAL 505,000.00$ 208 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 13,000.00$ 13,000.00$ 209 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 3214.0 3.00$ 9,642.00$ 210 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 350.0 3.00$ 1,050.00$ 211 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 3214 2.50$ 8,035.00$ 212 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 884 8.00$ 7,072.00$ 213 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 1179 8.00$ 9,432.00$ 214 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 1768 16.00$ 28,288.00$ 215 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 1928 24.00$ 46,272.00$ 216 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 3.0 300.00$ 900.00$ 217 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 826 30.00$ 24,780.00$ 218 2231.603 BITUMINOUS RAMPING LF 640 1.25$ 800.00$ 219 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 161 5.00$ 805.00$ 220 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 286 86.00$ 24,596.00$ 221 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 382 84.00$ 32,088.00$ 222 2502.541 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 200 15.00$ 3,000.00$ 223 2502.602 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 4 550.00$ 2,200.00$ 224 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 72 60.00$ 4,320.00$ 225 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 300 70.00$ 21,000.00$ 226 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM)EACH 2 750.00$ 1,500.00$ 227 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 L F 12 500.00$ 6,000.00$ 228 2506.602 CONST DRAINATE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (2'X3') EACH 2 2,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 229 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 704 16.00$ 11,264.00$ 230 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 231 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 232 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 233 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 234 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 10 250.00$ 2,500.00$ 235 2573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS L F 250 2.50$ 625.00$ 236 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER L F 250 2.50$ 625.00$ 237 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE ROCK L F 100 8.00$ 800.00$ 238 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 40 30.00$ 1,200.00$ 239 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 500 2.50$ 1,250.00$ 240 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 356 1.25$ 445.00$ 241 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 9 5.00$ 45.00$ 242 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 153.0 8.00$ 1,224.00$ 243 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 0.1 4,000.00$ 400.00$ 244 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 450 1.00$ 450.00$ 245 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 24 4.00$ 96.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 280,904.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 28,090.40$ SUBTOTAL 308,994.40$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 77,248.60$ TOTAL 386,000.00$ H1. Intersection Costs - CR 101 Signal G3. Intersection Costs - CR 116 South Turn Lanes H2. Intersection Costs - CR 47 Turn Lanes & Approach WSB Project:Hackamore Drive Option 2 Design By:LME Project Location:Medina, MN Checked By:JLS City Project No.: WSB Project No:015661-00 Date:6/3/2020 Item No. MnDOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 51,800.00$ 51,800.00$ 2 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.2 20,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 3 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.2 15,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 4 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 676.0 3.00$ 2,028.00$ 5 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 250.0 5.00$ 1,250.00$ 6 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 250.0 7.00$ 1,750.00$ 7 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 150.0 3.00$ 450.00$ 8 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 12056 2.50$ 30,140.00$ 9 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 4950 8.00$ 39,600.00$ 10 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 3504 8.00$ 28,032.00$ 11 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 6631 16.00$ 106,096.00$ 12 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 7234 24.00$ 173,616.00$ 13 2106.507 EXCAVATION - MUCK C Y 954 24.00$ 22,896.00$ 14 2106.507 GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 954 24.00$ 22,896.00$ 15 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 27 300.00$ 8,100.00$ 16 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM HOUR 25 175.00$ 4,375.00$ 17 2131.506 CALCIUM CHLORIDE SOLUTION GAL 1723 3.00$ 5,169.00$ 18 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 1668 30.00$ 50,040.00$ 19 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION S Y 6078.0 3.00$ 18,234.00$ 20 2231.603 BITUMINOUS RAMPING LF 1310 1.25$ 1,637.50$ 21 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 603 5.00$ 3,015.00$ 22 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 1788 86.00$ 153,768.00$ 23 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 2504 84.00$ 210,336.00$ 24 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - 3.0" THICK S Y 263 50.00$ 13,150.00$ 25 2502.541 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 250 15.00$ 3,750.00$ 26 2502.602 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 3 550.00$ 1,650.00$ 27 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 922 16.00$ 14,752.00$ 28 2531.504 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY S Y 250 60.00$ 15,000.00$ 29 2545.601 RELOCATE UTILITY L S 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 30 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S 1 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 31 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 32 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 33 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 34 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 10 250.00$ 2,500.00$ 35 2573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS L F 2000 2.50$ 5,000.00$ 36 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER L F 2000 2.50$ 5,000.00$ 37 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE ROCK L F 500 8.00$ 4,000.00$ 38 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 321 30.00$ 9,630.00$ 39 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 500 2.50$ 1,250.00$ 40 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 2912 1.25$ 3,640.00$ 41 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 106 5.00$ 530.00$ 42 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 1249.00 8.00$ 9,992.00$ 43 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 1.30 4,000.00$ 5,200.00$ 44 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 5240 1.00$ 5,240.00$ 45 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 50 2.00$ 100.00$ 46 2582.503 DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAINT L F 2620 1.00$ 2,620.00$ 46 2582.518 CROSSWALK MSSG PAINT S F 216 3.50$ 756.00$ 47 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 72 4.00$ 288.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 1,086,476.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 108,647.65$ SUBTOTAL 1,195,124.15$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 298,781.04$ TOTAL 1,494,000.00$ WETLAND MITIGATION COST 11,430.00$ A. Roadway Costs - Hackamore Phase 1 OPINION OF PROBABLE COST 48 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 7,900.00$ 7,900.00$ 49 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.1 20,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 50 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.1 15,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 51 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 1331 8.00$ 10,648.00$ 52 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 566 8.00$ 4,528.00$ 53 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 486 30.00$ 14,580.00$ 54 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - TRAIL S Y 2661 30.00$ 79,830.00$ 55 2531.504 6" CONCRETE WALK S F 400 10.00$ 4,000.00$ 56 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F 64 50.00$ 3,200.00$ 57 2540.618 RETAINING WALL S F 375 75.00$ 28,125.00$ 58 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 161 30.00$ 4,830.00$ 59 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 1456 1.25$ 1,820.00$ 60 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 34 5.00$ 170.00$ 61 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 0.4 4,000.00$ 1,600.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 164,731.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 16,473.10$ SUBTOTAL 181,204.10$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 45,301.03$ TOTAL 227,000.00$ 62 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 10,500.00$ 10,500.00$ 63 2105.601 DEWATERING L S 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 64 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 4)L S 1 88,800.00$ 88,800.00$ 65 2130.610 UTILITY CREW HOUR 8 800.00$ 6,400.00$ 66 2451.607 PIPE BEDDING MATERIAL C Y 28 16.00$ 448.00$ 67 2501.502 18" PIPE APRON EACH 4 300.00$ 1,200.00$ 68 2501.502 24" PIPE APRON EACH 4 500.00$ 2,000.00$ 69 2501.503 18" PIPE CULVERT L F 60 65.00$ 3,900.00$ 70 2501.503 24" PIPE CULVERT L F 72 85.00$ 6,120.00$ 71 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 300 60.00$ 18,000.00$ 72 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 500 70.00$ 35,000.00$ 73 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 144 90.00$ 12,960.00$ 74 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM)EACH 5 750.00$ 3,750.00$ 75 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 L F 24 500.00$ 12,000.00$ 76 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 60-4020 L F 6 600.00$ 3,600.00$ 77 2506.602 CONST DRAINATE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (2'X3') EACH 6 2,500.00$ 15,000.00$ 78 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III C Y 28 100.00$ 2,800.00$ 79 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS IV C Y 48 150.00$ 7,200.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 231,678.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (25%) 57,919.50$ SUBTOTAL 289,597.50$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (0%) 72,399.38$ TOTAL 362,000.00$ C. Storm Costs - Hackamore Phase 1 B. Trail Costs - Hackamore Phase 1 80 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 69,500.00$ 69,500.00$ 81 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.3 20,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 82 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.3 15,000.00$ 4,500.00$ 83 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 972.0 3.00$ 2,916.00$ 84 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 250.0 5.00$ 1,250.00$ 85 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 250.0 7.00$ 1,750.00$ 86 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 150.0 3.00$ 450.00$ 87 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 17349 2.50$ 43,372.50$ 88 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 7123 8.00$ 56,984.00$ 89 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 5042 8.00$ 40,336.00$ 90 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 9542 16.00$ 152,672.00$ 91 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 10409 24.00$ 249,816.00$ 92 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 38 300.00$ 11,400.00$ 93 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM HOUR 25 175.00$ 4,375.00$ 94 2131.506 CALCIUM CHLORIDE SOLUTION GAL 2480 3.00$ 7,440.00$ 95 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 2400 30.00$ 72,000.00$ 96 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION S Y 8746.0 3.00$ 26,238.00$ 97 2231.603 BITUMINOUS RAMPING LF 1855 1.25$ 2,318.75$ 98 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 868 5.00$ 4,340.00$ 99 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 2573 86.00$ 221,278.00$ 100 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 3603 84.00$ 302,652.00$ 101 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - 3.0" THICK S Y 263 50.00$ 13,150.00$ 102 2502.541 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 250 15.00$ 3,750.00$ 103 2502.602 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 3 550.00$ 1,650.00$ 104 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 1972 16.00$ 31,552.00$ 105 2531.504 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY S Y 250 60.00$ 15,000.00$ 106 2545.601 RELOCATE UTILITY L S 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 107 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S 1 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 108 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 109 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 110 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 111 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 10 250.00$ 2,500.00$ 112 2573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS L F 2000 2.50$ 5,000.00$ 113 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER L F 2000 2.50$ 5,000.00$ 114 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE ROCK L F 500 8.00$ 4,000.00$ 115 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 454 30.00$ 13,620.00$ 116 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 500 2.50$ 1,250.00$ 117 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 4123 1.25$ 5,153.75$ 118 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 150 5.00$ 750.00$ 119 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 1769.00 8.00$ 14,152.00$ 120 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 1.8 4,000.00$ 7,200.00$ 121 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 7420 1.00$ 7,420.00$ 122 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 50 2.00$ 100.00$ 123 2582.503 DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAINT L F 3710 1.00$ 3,710.00$ 123 2582.518 CROSSWALK MSSG PAINT S F 216 3.50$ 756.00$ 124 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 72 4.00$ 288.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 1,457,790.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 145,779.00$ SUBTOTAL 1,603,569.00$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 400,892.25$ TOTAL 2,004,000.00$ WETLAND MITIGATION COST 71,394.00$ 125 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 9,200.00$ 9,200.00$ 126 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.1 20,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 127 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.1 15,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 128 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 1915 8.00$ 15,320.00$ 129 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 815 8.00$ 6,520.00$ 130 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 699 30.00$ 20,970.00$ 131 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - TRAIL S Y 3830 30.00$ 114,900.00$ 132 2531.504 6" CONCRETE WALK S F 400 10.00$ 4,000.00$ 133 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F 64 50.00$ 3,200.00$ 134 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 227 30.00$ 6,810.00$ 135 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 2062 1.25$ 2,577.50$ 136 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 47 5.00$ 235.00$ 137 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 1 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 191,232.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 19,123.25$ SUBTOTAL 210,355.75$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 52,588.94$ TOTAL 263,000.00$ E. Trail Costs - Hackamore Phase 2 & 3 D. Roadway Costs - Hackamore Phase 2 & 3 138 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 13,100.00$ 13,100.00$ 139 2105.601 DEWATERING L S 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 140 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 1)L S 1 -$ -$ 141 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 2)L S 1 41,200.00$ 41,200.00$ 142 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 3N)L S 1 58,500.00$ 58,500.00$ 143 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 3S)L S 1 55,900.00$ 55,900.00$ 144 2130.610 UTILITY CREW HOUR 8 800.00$ 6,400.00$ 145 2451.607 PIPE BEDDING MATERIAL C Y 42 16.00$ 672.00$ 146 2501.502 18" PIPE APRON EACH 10 300.00$ 3,000.00$ 147 2501.502 24" PIPE APRON EACH 2 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 148 2501.503 18" PIPE CULVERT L F 150 65.00$ 9,750.00$ 149 2501.503 24" PIPE CULVERT L F 36 85.00$ 3,060.00$ 150 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 300 60.00$ 18,000.00$ 151 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 500 70.00$ 35,000.00$ 152 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 144 90.00$ 12,960.00$ 153 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM)EACH 4 750.00$ 3,000.00$ 154 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 L F 24 500.00$ 12,000.00$ 155 2506.602 CONST DRAINATE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (2'X3') EACH 8 2,500.00$ 20,000.00$ 156 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III C Y 70 100.00$ 7,000.00$ 157 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS IV C Y 24 150.00$ 3,600.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 306,142.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (25%) 76,535.50$ SUBTOTAL 382,677.50$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 95,669.38$ TOTAL 478,000.00$ 158 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 17,500.00$ 17,500.00$ 159 2565.601 SIGNAL SYSTEM LS 1 350,000.00$ 350,000.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 367,500.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 36,750.00$ SUBTOTAL 404,250.00$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 101,062.50$ TOTAL 505,000.00$ 160 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 2,600.00$ 2,600.00$ 161 2231.604 BITUMINOUS PATCHING S Y 167 150.00$ 25,050.00$ 162 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 350.0 3.00$ 1,050.00$ 163 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 211 2.50$ 527.50$ 164 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 58 12.00$ 696.00$ 165 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 78 12.00$ 936.00$ 166 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 116 16.00$ 1,856.00$ 167 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 127 36.00$ 4,572.00$ 168 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 1 300.00$ 300.00$ 169 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 55 40.00$ 2,200.00$ 170 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 11 5.00$ 55.00$ 171 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 19 120.00$ 2,280.00$ 172 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 26 118.00$ 3,068.00$ 173 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 174 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 175 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 40 35.00$ 1,400.00$ 176 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 84 3.50$ 294.00$ 177 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 84 2.00$ 168.00$ 178 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 9 5.00$ 45.00$ 179 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 36.0 12.00$ 432.00$ 180 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 0.1 4,000.00$ 400.00$ 181 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 450 2.00$ 900.00$ 182 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 24 4.00$ 96.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 53,125.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 5,312.55$ SUBTOTAL 58,438.05$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 14,609.51$ TOTAL 73,000.00$ G2. Intersection Costs - CR 116 North Turn Lanes F. Storm Costs - Hackamore Phase 2 & 3 G1. Intersection Costs - CR 116 Signal 183 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 2,800.00$ 2,800.00$ 184 2231.604 BITUMINOUS PATCHING S Y 167 150.00$ 25,050.00$ 185 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 350 3.00$ 1,050.00$ 186 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 265 2.50$ 662.50$ 187 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 73 12.00$ 876.00$ 188 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 97 12.00$ 1,164.00$ 189 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 146 16.00$ 2,336.00$ 190 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 159 36.00$ 5,724.00$ 191 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 1 300.00$ 300.00$ 192 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 68 40.00$ 2,720.00$ 193 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 14 5.00$ 70.00$ 194 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 24 120.00$ 2,880.00$ 195 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 32 118.00$ 3,776.00$ 196 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 197 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 198 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 40 35.00$ 1,400.00$ 199 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 84 3.50$ 294.00$ 200 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 84 2.00$ 168.00$ 201 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 9 5.00$ 45.00$ 202 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 36.0 12.00$ 432.00$ 203 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 0.1 4,000.00$ 400.00$ 204 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 450 2.00$ 900.00$ 205 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 24 4.00$ 96.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 57,343.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 5,734.35$ SUBTOTAL 63,077.85$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 15,769.46$ TOTAL 79,000.00$ 206 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 17,500.00$ 17,500.00$ 207 2565.601 SIGNAL SYSTEM LS 1 350,000.00$ 350,000.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 367,500.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 36,750.00$ SUBTOTAL 404,250.00$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 101,062.50$ TOTAL 505,000.00$ 208 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 13,000.00$ 13,000.00$ 209 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 3214 3.00$ 9,642.00$ 210 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 350 3.00$ 1,050.00$ 211 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 3214 2.50$ 8,035.00$ 212 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 884 8.00$ 7,072.00$ 213 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 1179 8.00$ 9,432.00$ 214 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 1768 16.00$ 28,288.00$ 215 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 1928 24.00$ 46,272.00$ 216 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 3.0 300.00$ 900.00$ 217 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 826 30.00$ 24,780.00$ 218 2231.603 BITUMINOUS RAMPING LF 640 1.25$ 800.00$ 219 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 161 5.00$ 805.00$ 220 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 286 86.00$ 24,596.00$ 221 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 382 84.00$ 32,088.00$ 222 2502.541 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 200 15.00$ 3,000.00$ 223 2502.602 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 4 550.00$ 2,200.00$ 224 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 72 60.00$ 4,320.00$ 225 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 300 70.00$ 21,000.00$ 226 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM)EACH 2 750.00$ 1,500.00$ 227 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 L F 12 500.00$ 6,000.00$ 228 2506.602 CONST DRAINATE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (2'X3') EACH 2 2,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 229 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 704 16.00$ 11,264.00$ 230 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 231 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 232 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 233 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 234 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 10 250.00$ 2,500.00$ 235 2573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS L F 250 2.50$ 625.00$ 236 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER L F 250 2.50$ 625.00$ 237 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE ROCK L F 100 8.00$ 800.00$ 238 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 40 30.00$ 1,200.00$ 239 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 500 2.50$ 1,250.00$ 240 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 356 1.25$ 445.00$ 241 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 9 5.00$ 45.00$ 242 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 153.0 8.00$ 1,224.00$ 243 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 0.1 4,000.00$ 400.00$ 244 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 450 1.00$ 450.00$ 245 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 24 4.00$ 96.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 280,904.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 28,090.40$ SUBTOTAL 308,994.40$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 77,248.60$ TOTAL 386,000.00$ H2. Intersection Costs - CR 47 Turn Lanes & Approach H1. Intersection Costs - CR 101 Signal G3. Intersection Costs - CR 116 South Turn Lanes 7 0 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | S U I T E 3 0 0 | M I N N E A P O L I S , M N | 5 5 4 1 6 | 7 6 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | W S B E N G . C O M Agenda: ECWMC Pre-Application Meeting (Virtual) - Minutes Project: Hackamore Road Improvement Project Date: April 23, 2020 Proj. No.: WSB Project No. 015661-000 Attendees: See Below 1. Introductions City of Medina: Dusty Finke, Steve Scherer City of Corcoran: Kevin Mattson WSB: Heather Nelson, Jim Stremel Elm Creek: Jim Kujawa, Joe Waln 2. Project Location a. Hackamore Road west of CR116 and just past CR101 3. Scope a. Joint project between City of Medina and City of Corcoran b. Current Scope is for 30% & 75% Design for roadway, trail, intersections, stormwater management c. Project is proposed to be constructed in phases, discuss permitting in phases. · The easterly portion is proposed for construction in 2021, the westerly phases will be driven in large part by development occurring in subsequent years, possibly within 5 years. · Full design for the project up to 75%, eastern phase will be 100% design. · Greater than 5 years’ timeline may have an issue with the commission getting permitted. · Work the BMPs with adjacent developments. · Potential for BMPs within adjacent developments could be approved as a condition to the watershed permit. 4. Anticipated ECWMC Permitting Needs a. Potential Culvert replacements · DNR and ECWMC both require permit for extension or replacement City of Medina and City of Corcoran - Hackamore Road Improvement Project ECWMC Pre-Application Meeting – 4/23/2020 – Meeting Minutes Page 2 · Watershed would require that the conveyance for the 2, 10, and 100- year events are the same if the culverts are replaced. b. New Impervious – Approximately 5 Acres · Road widening to include turn lanes · Trail Construction, there is no exception for a linear trail installation with turf boulevard. c. BMP locations · Provide rate control and water quality volume · Discussion on BMP locations with phased project approach. · BMP mass balance, individual drainage areas be treated if possible. · For a linear project, the watershed would look at this project with a “mass balance” concept for the whole corridor. · The watershed suggested protecting the Manage 1 wetland at the SE quad of CR116, possibly with the use of curb/CB’s to direct runoff to the north. d. Wetland Delineation has been prepared for the right of way areas e. No FEMA floodplain impacts are anticipated 5. Schedule a. Anticipate submittal of the permit application to ECWMC by July 2020 b. Construction start 2021 for Phase 1 (from about Steeplechase to the east) 6. Questions, Clarifications, Other 7. Adjourn 7 0 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | S U I T E 3 0 0 | M I N N E A P O L I S , M N | 5 5 4 1 6 | 7 6 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | W S B E N G . C O M Agenda: Large Agency Group Coordination Meeting - Minutes Project: Hackamore Road Improvement Project Date: April 27, 2020 Proj. No.: 015661-000 Attendees: See below 1. Introductions City of Medina: Dusty Finke, Steve Scherer City of Corcoran: Kevin Mattson, Brad Martens City of Plymouth: Michael Thompson, Chris LaBounty City of Maple Grove: John Hagen Hennepin County: Jason Gottfried, Jonathan Krieg WSB: Chuck Rickart, Lydia Ener, Jim Stremel 2. Scope & Project Location a. Joint project between City of Corcoran and City of Medina b. Hackamore Rd from Medina Lk Dr (west extents) to CR 101 (east extents) in including the approach to CR 101 from CR 47 c. Current engineering scope is 30% & 75% Design for roadway, trail, intersections, stormwater management. d. Project is proposed to be constructed in phases, with the easterly half (Phase 1) scheduled for 2021 construction. 3. Geometric Design (30%) a. Two geometric options being reviewed for 30% · Three lane option · Two lane option with dedicated turn lanes · No significant difference between CR 101 and CR 116 intersections with either option · 40 MPH design speed b. Traffic counts and analysis (turn lanes, intersection design) c. Trail alignment review, proposed on north side d. Initial stormwater management considerations, looking for coordination with adjacent developments on Corcoran side (Eaglebrook Church, Lennar, Gonyea) 4. Intersection at CR 101/CR 47 a. Hackamore geometric review b. CR 47 Corridor study/status · City of Plymouth has received final draft comments from Hennepin Co. · Timing of proposed improvements, study was scoping document, City of Corcoran/Medina - Hackamore Rd Improvement Project – Large Agency Group Coordination - Minutes April 27, 2020 Page 2 · Pedestrian improvements and connection to destinations a priority for the public, speed reduction is also a priority, most of corridor is a two-lane version with dedicated turn lanes · Development at SE quadrant (Weston Ridge development) is being considered. · City of Plymouth has grant funding for trail to the southeast (funds only for 101 and not for CR 47), the trail located along CR 101 south of the intersection. · Hackamore matching proposed layout in draft plan · Interim basis design, transition/matching existing section on CR 47 · Right of way impacts, trail close to ROW on Maple Grove side b. Eaglebrook Church concept plan/access discussion at the NW quadrant of CR 101 c. Signal relocation/adjustments d. Cost share considerations · City of Medina asked about signal cost participation for relocations, County will need to weigh in on that with others from their design group. e. County comments: overhead power lines would be in the way of the signal luminaires (now a standard with the County). If overhead power cannot be put underground, then other lighting alternatives may be necessary. f. City of Plymouth has had extensive discussions with property owners and they would like the pedestrian access built with the CR 47 turnback. 5. Intersection at CR 116 a. Hackamore geometric review, NB/SB right turn lanes b. Adjacent development in the NW and NE quadrants · Timing of proposed developments · Access to Hackamore b. Right of way impacts c. Signal relocation/adjustments d. Cost share considerations · SB right turn lane, development responsible (Wessel) for cost sharing · NB right turn lane not necessarily specific development driven improvement 6. Stakeholder Engagement a. Large Group Meetings with County, cities of Plymouth/Maple Grove b. Project meetings every two weeks (City of Medina/Plymouth) c. MyLink site for project d. Community engagement activities 7. Next Steps a. Further design of both options, Corcoran/Medina select preferred option b. Design concurrence with County/cities at CR 116/101 c. 75% design of preferred option, determine project costs/funding d. Provide County with formal request for cost sharing at either the June or July 2020 meeting. Could take up to 6 months for agreement to be finalized. City of Corcoran/Medina - Hackamore Rd Improvement Project – Large Agency Group Coordination - Minutes April 27, 2020 Page 3 8. Schedule 30 % Design Services Kick-Off Meeting with Cities ................................................................................ March 12, 2020 Field Work (Traffic Counts, Remaining Topographic Survey) .................................. March 2020 1st Large Stakeholder Meeting (Plymouth, County, Both Cities) ......................... Late April 2020 Complete 30% Level of Geometric Design ........................................................ Early May 2020 Utility Company Notifications/Meeting (if needed)....................................................... May 2020 Evaluate Initial Right of Way Needs ............................................................................ May 2020 Community Engagement Event ............................................................................ Mid May 2020 Draft 30% Memoranda to Cities (Review and Comment) .................................... Mid May 2020 1st Set of City Council Meetings (30% Design Review/Input) ............................ Early June 2020 Final 30% Memoranda to Cities ..................................................................... by Mid-June 2020 75 % Design Services Begin 75% Level of Design ........................................................................................ June 2020 2nd Large Stakeholder Meeting (Plymouth, County, Both Cities) ...... Late June/Early July 2020 Evaluate Final Right of Way Needs .............................................................................. July 2020 Draft of 75% Memoranda to Cities (Review and Comment) ................................... August 2020 2nd Set of City Council Meetings (75% Design Review/Input) ........ Late July/Early August 2020 Provide Final 75% Memoranda to Cities ........................................................ Early August 2020 Complete 75% Level of Design/Plans .................................................................... August 2020 9. Questions, Clarifications, Other a. Action items (WSB): · Summary request to Jason and CC John Krieg so they can begin the discussion internally (Complete). · Schedule a follow-up meeting during 75% design · Formal request to County for cost sharing at June or July board meeting 10. Adjourn City of Corcoran & City of Medina Hackamore Road Reconstruction Project - 30% Design Public Engagement Activity - Map Comparison/Comments on Social Pinpoint Comments to date: June 3, 2020 Created on Type of Comment Map Option Comment Up Votes Down Votes First Name 2020-06-03 10:51:35 +1000 Something I Like Option 1 There is access from 101 which should be the primary entrance to the development.0 0 Maureen 2020-06-03 10:48:07 +1000 Something I Dislike Option 1 Absolutely agree. These developments shouldn't be destroying our small town feel. They have access to their developments from 116 and 101.0 0 Maureen 2020-06-03 10:45:13 +1000 Make a Comment Option 1 Dusty..Less wetland impact on the north side? There is virtually nothing on the south side east of Hackamore Circle. Except Wild Meadows. Does that have anything to do with this rational?0 0 Maureen 2020-06-02 07:51:53 +1000 Something I Like Option 1 Walking path for safety is nice 0 0 Jimmy 2020-06-02 07:50:58 +1000 Something I Dislike Option 1 This is a small unused road that many families use today to run, walk, and bike. You should consider adding lanes on pinto into the neighborhood rather than increasing traffic on Hackamore. There should also be green space on both sides of the road or at least the south where there is already a current nice housing community. Create buffers on both sides of the road please 2 0 Jimmy 2020-06-02 00:31:37 +1000 Something I Dislike Option 1 There isn't any need for a turn lane into Hackamore Cir --only four families live here, and some are retirees with no children.1 0 John 2020-05-30 06:49:32 +1000 Something I Dislike Option 1 I agree, no turn lanes needed!0 0 2020-05-28 02:48:31 +1000 Make a Comment Option 1 Some of the initial rationale for the trail on the north side: 1) There is likely going to be a higher population along the north side of Hackamore, providing the opportunity for the greater amount of people to access the trail w/o crossing Hackamore. 2) The trail may be able to be incorporated into adjacent developments in Corcoran, potentially making it easier to have more space from the street. 3) It is anticipated there may be less wetland impacts on the north side. - Dusty Finke, Medina 0 0 2020-05-28 02:43:03 +1000 Make a Comment Option 1 Thank you for your comments! The primary difference between the two options is that Option 1 provides a continuous left turn lane to each street and driveway. Option 2 provides left-turn lanes only for the more traveled roadways. As a result, Option 1 is generally wider. - Dusty Finke, City of Medina 0 0 2020-05-27 03:56:21 +1000 Make a Comment Option 1 Agreed. It seems most of the traffic would be coming/going toward the south on both Pinto and Brockton. Putting the trail on the south side of Hackamore would prevent more road crossings and be much safer.0 0 2020-05-27 03:51:54 +1000 Something I Like Option 1 This will be important to have dedicated turn lanes for such a large development as The Reserve 1 1 2020-05-25 03:47:48 +1000 Make a Comment Option 1 It's a little difficult to see enough from these options but it appears to me that the majority of the construction in both is taking place on the Corcoran side. Why is that? There's plenty of space on the other side (Medina) for trails and green space. In addition, I'm assuming you are planning to move all the mailboxes that are on Hackamore to the houses with all these changes.1 1 Maureen 2020-05-20 12:09:52 +1000 Something I Dislike Option 1 Hackamore Road does not need to be turned into a through street handling a lot of traffic. There are other options for getting to 101 and 116. Corcoran is allowing and encouraging the loss of the charm of the area in its entirety!4 0 Maureen 2020-05-20 07:42:20 +1000 Something I Dislike Option 1 No turning lanes here 1 0 Fred 2020-05-19 23:59:47 +1000 Ideas and Suggestions Option 1 Due to future development , safety and low cost of small addition I think the project should be extended to a new intersection at 62nd and Snyder Road. This will eliminate a nothing road project in the near future.2 0 Dennis 2020-06-03 10:55:22 +1000 Something I Dislike Option 2 Getting the impression that our opinions don't matter because we are Corcoran....0 0 Maureen 2020-06-02 07:54:06 +1000 Ideas and Suggestions Option 2 Preference is option #2, but would still like to seen green space on the south side of hackamore west of 116 0 0 Jimmy 2020-06-02 07:04:50 +1000 Something I Like Option 2 I'm glad to see a trail on both options. This is really needed for safety for walking/running/biking. Hoping that it will eventually be able to connect out to the NW Greenway!0 0 2020-06-02 00:39:37 +1000 Something I Dislike Option 2 While we like option 2 better, we still have issues, specifically how much of our land will be taken (do you REALLY need this much or ANY green space?) but mostly our issue is water, water, water. Drain flow in our ditch is terrible right now, with much standing water for days and days after a rain. You MUST solve the water flow problem first. How do you intend to handle that with the improvements? We want someone to come out and talk to us BEFORE any decisions are made.1 0 John 2020-05-27 07:08:15 +1000 Make a Comment Option 2 I would like to work with the city for proper water drainage. Water comes from the east and goes in the drain in the middle of my front yard. Water then goes to the wetland to the south, or to the north through the culvert under Hackamore. I have attached a picture of frequent yearly floods in my front yard. Lots of speeding vehicles. Would be great if we could figure out a way to control the speeders. Getting mail everyday is a dangerous activity.1 0 Ryan Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 June 16, 2020 City Council Meeting MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: June 10, 2020 SUBJ: Planning Department Updates – June 16, 2020 City Council Meeting Land Use Application Review A) Roehl Preliminary Plat – 1735 Medina Road – The Estate of Robert Roehl has requested a preliminary plat to subdivide 28 acres into two lots. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 12 and recommended approval. The City Council reviewed on June 2 and directed staff to prepare a resolution of approval, which will be presented on June 16. B) OSI Expansion – Arrowhead Drive, north of Highway 55 – Arrowhead Holdings (real estate company for OSI) has requested final plat approval for Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park 3rd Addn. The City Council previously granted approval of a site plan review and preliminary plat to construct an expansion to the existing building and parking lot at 4101 Arrowhead Drive. Staff intends to present to the City Council on June 16. C) Meadow View Townhomes– north of Highway 55, west of CR116 – Lennar has applied for a preliminary plat to develop 125 townhomes on approximately 20 net acres. Staff has conducted a preliminary review and requested additional information. The request will be presented at a public hearing when complete, potentially at the July 14 Planning Commission meeting. D) Cates Ranch Comp Plan Amendment and Rezoning – 2575 and 2590 Cates Ranch Drive – Robert Atkinson has requested a change of the future land use from Future Development Area to Business, a staging plan amendment to 2020, and a rezoning to Business Park. The application is incomplete for review, and the City has requested additional materials. E) Mark of Excellence Comp Plan Amendment, PUD Concept Plan – east of Mohawk Drive, north of Highway 55 – Mark Smith (Mark of Excellence Homes) has requested a Comp Plan Amendment and PUD Concept Plan for development of 76 twinhomes, 41 single- family, and 32 townhomes on the Roy and Cavanaugh properties. The Council adopted a resolution granting conditional approval and authorizing submission to the Met Council. The Met Council has authorized the City to put the amendment into effect. Staff will await a preliminary plat application. F) Adam’s Pest Control Site Plan Review, Pre Plat, Rezoning – Jan-Har, LLP (dba Adam’s Pest Control) has requested various approvals for development of a 35,000 s.f. office building, restaurant, and 13,000 s.f. warehouse/repair shop north of Highway 55, west of Willow Drive (PIDs 04-118-23-21-0001 and 04-118-23-24-0001). The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the November 12 and March 10 meetings and recommended approval. The City Council adopted approval documents on March 17. G) Johnson ADU CUP, Hamel Brewery, St. Peter and Paul Cemetery – The City Council has adopted resolutions approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants with the conditions of approval in order to complete the projects. H) Hamel Haven subdivision – These subdivisions have received final approval. Staff is working with the applicants on the conditions of approval before the plat is recorded. Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 June 16, 2020 City Council Meeting Other Projects A) Building permit activity – permit activity continues to be extremely busy, likely on another record pace. With City Hall being closed, Deb has been doing a great job using our existing systems to coordinate permits from off-site. B) Tamarack Drive study – The Council reviewed public engagement and the draft concepts at the May 19 council meeting and directed staff to finalize the report. Staff intends to present at the July 7 meeting. C) Hackamore Road Preliminary Design – Online engagement is currently underway on two concepts for the Hackamore Road Improvements. WSB has created an online activity that is available and a virtual open house was held from on May 19. Both available at https://medinamn.us/hackamore Staff intends to present at the June 16 meeting. D) Commercial Exterior Building Materials – Staff has been in discussions with a property owner hoping to install LP siding over portions of an existing concrete building which has had water issues. Staff presented an ordinance amendment for discussion at the June 9 Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance, and recommended that the flexibility be expanded for any retrofit, even if the building is not having water issues. Staff intends to present the ordinance at the July 7 meeting. E) Budget – staff prepared department budget recommendation for Finance/Administration consideration for presentation to the City Council. F) Wealshire Expansion – staff has worked with the Wealshire to finalize their plans to construct the 2nd Phase of the building. The permit has been issued and work is expected to begin soon. G) Fields of Medina HOA meeting – Staff met with members of the Fields of Medina HOA Board related to maintenance of the filtration trenches and other stormwater management improvements. Staff provided a lot of information on the improvements and helped the Board understand the obligations. The meeting was very positive, and the board members seemed interested in securing professional service providers to maintain the improvements. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jason Nelson, Director of Public Safety, Through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: June 12, 2020 RE: Request to Continue with Police Officer Hiring Finally, the distance learning has ended, and the Governor has turned the dial to phase three and things are starting to get busier. We are seeing an uptick in almost everything across the board from thefts, burglaries, drug and alcohol crimes, etc. There is a noticeable amount of people now going back to work as the commuter times are busier on the roadways. We are noticing that excessive speed is becoming an issue. As a matter of fact, in the early morning hours of June 11 one of our officers stopped a vehicle on State Highway 55 for going 108 miles per hour. This male was believed to be intoxicated and subsequently arrested. We are receiving speeding complaints from several areas of the city and are actively enforcing the traffic laws once again. COVID 19 is still alive and real. We are still planning and preparing for different scenarios if our agency is affected. We have plans in place with our lakes area partners and continue to meet weekly on those plans. We are still using caution and following our standard operating procedures that we have put in place when responding to medicals. Demonstrations and protests are still happening in different areas of the metro as close as Plymouth and Maple Grove this week. The demonstrators are peaceful and seem to be working with police as to where and when they plan to have them. It is imperative that we continue to work with the organizers to ensure that they can have space and protection to peacefully protest. Patrol: Patrol Updates 05/27/2020 through 06/09/2020 Patrol Activities – Between the dates of May 27, 2020 through June 9, 2020 our officers issued 35 citations and 73 warnings for various traffic violations. There were 7 property damage accidents reported, 1 personal injury accident, 11 medicals, 5 business alarms, 6 residential alarms, 13 suspicious calls, and 15 assists to other agencies. Traffic volumes continue to increase as the Governor’s restrictions are slowly lifted. MEMORANDUM On 05/28 Officer responded to the 2500 block of Pioneer Trail to take a motor vehicle theft report. It was learned that someone had entered the yard of the residence and stolen a lawn tractor that had been parked outside. The mower was around 20 years old and the homeowner was unable to provide a serial number for the mower to enter into NCIC. On 05/29 Officer responded to assist West Hennepin Public Safety on a Domestic in Maple Plain. Officer assisted on a perimeter while a search was conducted for the suspect who had left the residence on foot. The suspect was eventually located and taken into custody without incident. On 05/31 Officer responded to a vehicle/motorcycle injury accident in the 4000 block of County Road 24. A vehicle that was westbound had slowed and signaled a left turn. The driver decided not to turn and was going to pull over to the right when a motorcycle attempted to pass the vehicle on the shoulder and ran into the side of the vehicle. The driver of the motorcycle did sustain injuries and was transported to the hospital with what was believed to be non-life-threatening injuries. On 06/03 Officers responded to a welfare check to a residence on Cherry Hill Alcove where a male called 911 to report he believed his parents were trying to kill him. Officers arrived and were able to make contact with the subject and his parents, both of which had been sleeping. Subject was found to have a known history of mental health issues and voluntarily went to the hospital to seek treatment. On 06/03 Officers responded to a theft in progress at Target where two suspects carried a large flat panel television out the front door without paying. A customer followed them and videotaped them loading the stolen item into an SUV. Officers were not able to locate the suspects, but a license plate of the vehicle was obtained by the witness. The case had been turned over to investigations. On 06/04 Officers were again dispatched to Target on a report of a theft in progress. A male suspect had pushed out a cart full of infant and child clothing without paying. A customer had also followed this suspect out of the store and took photos of the suspect as he was walking towards a vehicle with no license plates. The suspect was able to leave the area before officers arrived. After speaking with Target employees, it was determined that the suspect is a known frequent Target thief and they were able to provide identification. The case was also turned over to investigations. On 06/05 Officer driving along Hamel Road observed a worker unloading a semi-truck and drop a pallet of cargo onto the street. The cargo was approximately 50 plastic jugs of Chlorine and some of them began leaking. Hamel Fire Department and Medina Public Works were called out as a precaution and it was determined that the small amount that had spilled was not a hazard to the public or environment. On 06/09 Officer responded to assist Corcoran Police with a reported personal injury accident involving a large crane truck that had gone off the road and into a group of trees. Medina Officers assisted with closing County Road 116 north and south of the accident scene while the scene was cleared. On 06/09 Officer heard Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office dispatched to a motor vehicle theft that had just taken place at a car dealership in Corcoran. Officer read the notes of the call and eventually located the vehicle eastbound on Highway 55. Before he could arrange for other squads to assist with a stop the vehicle pulled into an office park in Plymouth and parked. The Officer exited his squad and ordered the driver out of the car at which time the suspect provided the Officer with an expletive choice of words and sped off through a grassy area and back east. The Officer lost sight of the vehicle. A short time later a nearby business reported a suspicious vehicle parked in their lot which turned out to be the stolen vehicle which was now unoccupied. Officers set up a perimeter and using a police K-9 was able to locate the suspect hiding in the back of a pickup truck. The suspect was taken into custody and positively identified by the victim from Corcoran. The suspect will be charged with the vehicle theft in Corcoran along with fleeing in a motor vehicle from the Medina Officer. Investigations: Investigating a forgery complaint through Craigslist. The victim rented a cabin through Craigslist and paid the suspect through Venmo. The victim later found the ad on Craigslist to be fake. I have sent an administrative subpoena to Venmo for more information. Investigating a theft complaint from a landscaping company. $300 worth of sod was stolen from the business. A picture of the suspect’s vehicle was put on the Police Departments Facebook page to identify the suspect. Investigating a theft report from a business. Two suspects stole Ring Doorbell cameras. One of the suspects has been identified by the business. The investigation is ongoing. Currently (8) cases assigned to investigations. MEMORANDUM TO: City Council, through City Administrator Scott Johnson FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: June 11, 2020 MEETING: June 16, 2020 SUBJECT: Public Works Update STREETS • Public works contracted a person to spray patch some of the failing seal coat areas in Medina. These areas have been repaired. We have also canceled our seal coating until these issues can be resolved. We are also looking into different options for maintaining pavement. • WSB will be giving a 30% plan report for Hackamore Road to council at this meeting. They are also working on the Tamarack visioning study for the July 7th meeting. • Mark Smith continues to work on the plans for the Chippewa Road connection. WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER • Public Works has completed work identified in our meter audit. Utilizing the software equipment available in our system, several meters were discovered to be not reading correctly. These meters have been repaired. • Inflow and infiltration meters have been installed and are currently being monitored in the trunk line running from HWY 55 up to the Foxberry and Toll additions. • A weekly progress meeting was held with Metropolitan Council Environmental Services and their construction partners. The project along County Rd. 19 is near completion. The other components of the project are an upgrade to the MCES metering station in Maple Plain, a meter being added at the Independence lift station as it leaves their city, and then of course the actual connection to Loretto. PARKS/TRAILS • The parks are in great shape and are being enjoyed by all. Mowing is being done twice a week at this time. • We are hoping to continue to widen the shoulder on the road trail along Medina Road on the north side. This is in the park and trail plan. We will work from the east to west on this and try to do the work in-house as we can fit it in over the next two years if possible. PERSONNEL • We have received several applications for the administrative assistant vacancy for planning and public works. Interviews will be scheduled for the week of July 6th. ORDER CHECKS JUNE 2, 2020 – JUNE 16, 2020 050296 COYLE, BARBARA ................................................................. $1,050.00 050297 GOLIN, SHERYL/ROBERT ........................................................ $250.00 050298 JUDGE, DAVID/LISA ................................................................. $850.00 050299 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS.TRUST ................................. $102,533.00 050300 MAHESHWARI, GAGAN/NEETU ............................................... $700.00 050301 MINNESOTA TITLE ESCROW ACCOUNT .................................. $53.22 050302 MN BOARD OF PEACE OFFICERS .......................................... $360.00 050303 MN DVS ....................................................................................... $42.75 050304 MURTHY, GANESHA ............................................................. $1,050.00 050305 NARASIMHAN, ANURADHA ..................................................... $500.00 050306 ASPEN MILLS INC .................................................................... $127.26 050307 BEAUDRY OIL & PROPANE .................................................. $2,745.14 050308 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN ................................... $34,822.92 050309 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC ....................................................... $10.85 050310 CANVAS SOLUTIONS, INC ....................................................... $752.16 050311 CENTERPOINT ENERGY ......................................................... $392.47 050312 CONTEMPORARY IMAGES ................................................... $2,063.40 050313 CORE & MAIN LP ........................................................................ $75.00 050314 DITTER COOLING & HEATING................................................. $901.86 050315 DPC INDUSTRIES INC ........................................................... $2,776.35 050316 EARL F ANDERSEN INC .......................................................... $975.00 050317 ECM PUBLISHERS INC .............................................................. $55.41 050318 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC ............................................. $471.15 050319 HAMEL BUILDING CENTER ..................................................... $258.63 050320 HAMEL LIONS CLUB ................................................................ $525.00 050321 HASSAN SAND & GRAVEL .................................................... $1,173.90 050322 HENN COUNTY INFO TECH .................................................. $2,143.07 050323 JEREDS LAWN CARE INC ................................................... $10,500.00 050324 JIMMYS JOHNNYS INC ......................................................... $1,205.00 050325 KD & COMPANY RECYCLING INC ........................................... $838.98 050326 KELLYS WRECKER SERVICE INC ............................................. $88.50 050327 KRAEMER MINING AND MATERIALS ................................... $1,477.81 050328 LANO EQUIPMENT INC ......................................................... $9,131.10 050329 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES ............................... $496.00 050330 LEXISNEXIS ................................................................................ $43.50 050331 MAPLE PLAIN, CITY OF ........................................................ $1,824.21 050332 MCFOA ........................................................................................ $45.00 050333 MCMA MN CTY/CO MGMT ASSOC .......................................... $289.29 050334 MET COUNCIL (WASTEWATER SVC) ................................ $30,736.53 050335 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC ........................................................ $98.86 050336 OFFICE DEPOT ........................................................................ $402.34 050337 ORONO, CITY OF .................................................................. $2,731.57 050338 RCM SPECIALTIES, INC. ..................................................... $10,185.00 050339 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY .............................................. $100.48 050340 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL ............................................................ $1,331.91 050341 TALLEN & BAERTSCHI .......................................................... $1,417.70 050342 TIME SAVER OFFSITE SEC SVCS IN ...................................... $254.50 050343 TWIN CITY STRIPING ............................................................ $6,329.56 050344 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER ................................................. $136.10 050345 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE .................................................. $45.00 Total Checks $237,367.48 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS JUNE 2, 2020 – JUNE 16, 2020 005541E FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL ....................................... $150.00 005542E PR PERA .............................................................................. $17,762.31 005543E PR FED/FICA ....................................................................... $17,942.22 005544E PR MN Deferred Comp ........................................................... $1,890.00 005545E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA .................................................. $4,007.77 005546E CITY OF MEDINA ........................................................................ $20.00 005547E FURTHER .............................................................................. $1,749.29 005548E AFLAC ....................................................................................... $324.66 005549E CENTURYLINK.......................................................................... $234.10 005550E CULLIGAN-METRO ..................................................................... $33.70 005551E FRONTIER .................................................................................. $56.91 005552E FURTHER ................................................................................. $143.80 005553E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC ........................................................... $817.14 005554E PAYMENT SERVICE NETWORK INC ....................................... $898.38 005555E PR MN Deferred Comp ......................................................... $59,061.41 005556E VERIZON WIRELESS ............................................................. $1,003.17 005557E CIPHER LABORATORIES INC. ............................................ $10,047.64 005558E PR FED/FICA .............................................................................. $89.35 005559E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA ....................................................... $20.64 Total Electronic Checks $116,252.49 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT JUNE 10, 2020 0510287 BOEDDEKER, KAYLEN ............................................................ $622.43 0510288 JOHNSON, PATRICK M. ........................................................... $633.53 0510289 ALBERS, TODD M. .................................................................... $230.87 0510290 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L. ................................................... $1,521.00 0510291 ANDERSON, JOHN G. .............................................................. $230.87 0510292 BARNHART, ERIN A. ............................................................. $2,514.01 0510293 BOECKER, KEVIN D. ............................................................. $3,636.75 0510294 CONVERSE, KEITH A. ........................................................... $3,196.24 0510295 DESLAURIES, DEAN ................................................................ $230.87 0510296 DION, DEBRA A. .................................................................... $1,880.14 0510297 ENDE, JOSEPH...................................................................... $1,874.27 0510298 FINKE, DUSTIN D. ................................................................. $2,689.30 0510299 GALLUP, JODI M. ................................................................... $2,119.18 0510300 GLEASON, JOHN M. .............................................................. $2,156.60 0510301 GREGORY, THOMAS ............................................................ $2,311.70 0510302 HALL, DAVID M. ..................................................................... $2,326.24 0510303 HANSON, JUSTIN .................................................................. $3,115.75 0510304 JACOBSON, NICOLE ................................................................ $893.17 0510305 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S. .......................................................... $2,258.13 0510306 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. ............................................................ $2,286.94 0510307 JONES, KATRINA M.................................................................. $683.98 0510308 KLAERS, ANNE M. ................................................................. $1,427.39 0510309 LEUER, GREGORY J. ............................................................ $1,857.77 0510310 MARTIN, KATHLEEN M ............................................................ $327.07 0510311 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. .................................................. $1,505.33 0510312 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D .......................................................... $2,444.01 0510313 NELSON, JASON ................................................................... $2,531.59 0510314 PEDERSON, JEFF .................................................................... $230.87 0510315 REINKING, DEREK M ............................................................ $2,525.74 0510316 SCHARF, ANDREW ............................................................... $2,019.44 0510317 SCHERER, STEVEN T. .......................................................... $2,372.90 0510318 SCHNEIDER, BENJAMIN .......................................................... $730.73 0510319 DINGMANN, NATHAN ............................................................ $1,056.26 Total Payroll Direct Deposit $56,441.07 PAYROLL MANUAL CHECK JUNE 10, 2020 0024446 JONES, KATRINA M.................................................................. $207.43 Total Payroll Manual Check $207.43