HomeMy Public PortalAbout10.19.2021 City Council Meeting Packet Posted 10/15/2021 Page 1 of 1
AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 19, 2021
7:00 P.M.
Meeting to be held telephonically/virtually
pursuant Minn. Stat. Sec. 13D.021
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Minutes of the October 5, 2021 Regular Council Meeting
V. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Resolution Certifying Delinquent Utility Charges to the Hennepin County Auditor for Collection
in 2022
B. Resolution Certifying Delinquent Storm Water Utility Charges to the Hennepin County Auditor
for Collection in 2022
C. Approve Joint Powers Agreement Between Hennepin County and Cities of Corcoran, Deephaven,
Medina, Minnetrista, Orono, South Lake Minnetonka, and Wayzata
D. Approve Proposal for Feasibility Study for Water Treatment Plant Improvements
E. Approve Work Completion and Escrow Agreement for Property located at 4650 Maple Street
VI. COMMENTS
A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda
B. Park Commission
C. Planning Commission
VII. PRESENTATION
A. Resolution Recognizing Public Works Water Operator Greg Leuer for Fifteen Years of Service to
the City of Medina
B. Long Lake Waters Association – Carp Removal Project Update – Anne Marie Grewal
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. BAPS Minneapolis LLC – 1400 Hamel Road – Site Plan Review for Approximately 46,000
square foot Building including Assembly, Classrooms and Ancillary Spaces
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. Ditter Cooling, Heating, and Electric – Sign Ordinance Regulations – Text Amendment
1. Ordinance Amending Regulations Pertaining to Signs; Amending Chapter 8 of the City
Code
B. Ordinance Amending Required Swimming Pool Setbacks from Utilities; Amending Chapter 8 of
the City Code
1. Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance by Title and Summary
C. Mark of Excellence Homes – Weston Woods of Medina – Final Plat – North of Highway 55 and
East of Mohawk Drive
1. Resolution Adopting the Weston Woods of Medina Comprehensive Plan Amendment
2. Resolution Granting Final Plat Approval for Weston Woods of Medina
3. Planned Unit Development Agreement by and between the City of Medina and Mark R.
Smith and Kathleen R. Smith for Weston Woods of Medina
X. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT
XI. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
XII. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS
XIII. ADJOURN
Telephonic/Virtual Meeting
Call-in Instructions
Join via Microsoft Teams to view
presentations at this link:
https://medinamn.us/council/
For audio only: Dial 1-612-517-3122
Enter Conference ID: 217 744 543#
MEMORANDUM
TO: Medina Mayor and City Council
FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator
DATE OF REPORT: October 14, 2021
DATE OF MEETING: October 19, 2021
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report
Telephonic/Virtual Meeting Call-in Instructions
Join via Microsoft Teams to view presentations at this link: https://medinamn.us/council/
For audio only: Dial 1-612-517-3122; Enter Conference ID: 217 744 543#
V. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Resolution Certifying Delinquent Utility Charges to the Hennepin County Auditor for
Collection in 2022 – Staff recommends approval of the resolution certifying delinquent
utility charges to the Hennepin County Auditor for collection in 2022.
See attached resolution.
B. Resolution Certifying Delinquent Storm Water Utility Charges to the Hennepin County
Auditor for Collection in 2022 – Staff recommends approval of the resolution certifying
delinquent storm water utility charges to the Hennepin County Auditor for collection in
2022.
See attached resolution.
C. Approve Joint Powers Agreement Between Hennepin County and Cities of Corcoran,
Deephaven, Medina, Minnetrista, Orono, South Lake Minnetonka, and Wayzata – At the
May 4th meeting, the City Council reviewed and approved the embedded social worker
program and directed staff to prepare the agreement. Staff recommends approval of the
agreement.
See attached agreement.
D. Approve Proposal for Feasibility Study for Water Treatment Plant Improvements – At the
September 15th meeting, the City Council discussed the water treatment plants ongoing
condition and potential upgrades to address deficiencies. Staff recommends approval for
the feasibility study to have WSB determine estimated costs and timelines for the various
proposed improvements.
See attached memo and proposal.
E. Approve Work Completion and Escrow Agreement for Property located at 4650 Maple
Street – The property will not complete the garage portion of their home in 2021. The
2
agreement provides time to complete the remainder of the project in 2022. Staff
recommends approval.
See attached agreement.
VII. PRESENTATION
A. Resolution Recognizing Public Works Water Operator Greg Leuer for Fifteen Years of
Service to the City of Medina – Mayor Martin will read the resolution.
See attached resolution.
Recommended Motion: Motion to adopt resolution recognizing Public Works Water
Operator Greg Leuer for fifteen years of service to the City of Medina
B. Long Lake Waters Association Carp Removal Project Update – Anne Marie Grewal with
the Long Lake Waters Association will be providing the City Council an update on their
carp removal project in Long Lake.
See attached presentation.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. BAPS Minneapolis LLC – 1400 Hamel Road – Site Plan Review for Approximately
46,000 square foot Building including Assembly, Classrooms and Ancillary Spaces –
Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha (BAPS) Minneapolis has
requested approval of a Site Plan Review for construction of an approximately 46,000
square foot building at 1400 Hamel Road. The subject property is located north of Hamel
Road and east of Arrowhead Drive. The Planning Commission reviewed the application
at their September 14th meeting and recommended approval of the Site Plan Review
subject to the conditions noted in the staff report. The City Council reviewed the
application at their October 5th meeting and directed staff to work with the applicant to
provide additional information on landscaping, renderings of the spire elements, and
additional details on the City’s height regulations in regard to the spire elements.
See attached report.
Potential Motion: Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution granting approval of the
site plan review subject to the conditions noted in the staff report.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. Ditter Cooling, Heating, and Electric – Sign Ordinance Regulations – Text Amendment –
Ditter Cooling, Heating, and Electric has requested that the City consider various
amendments to its sign ordinance. The applicant operates at 820 Tower Drive, west of
Pinto Drive and the applicant’s property backs up to Highway 55. The applicant is
interested in installing a dynamic display to advertise its business but believes existing
City regulations may limit the effectiveness of such a sign.
See attached report.
3
Potential Motion: Move to direct staff to update the ordinance pertaining to signs as
recommended by the Planning Commission [with the following changes:
_____________]
B. Ordinance Amending Required Swimming Pool Setbacks from Utilities; Amending
Chapter 8 of the City Code – The City’s Swimming Pool ordinance requires an 18’
setback from any underground or overhead utility line, which is significantly larger than
required by electrical or building code. In consultation with the Building and Electrical
Inspectors, staff believed it was reasonable to reduce the required setback for
underground utilities and is recommending that the setback be reduced to 5 feet for
underground utilities. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval at
their October 12th meeting.
See attached report.
Recommended Motion #1: Move to adopt ordinance amending required swimming pool
setbacks from utilities; amending chapter 8 of the city code
Recommended Motion #2: Move to adopt resolution authorizing publication of
ordinance by title and summary
C. Mark of Excellence Homes – Weston Woods – Final Plat – North of Highway 55 and
East of Mohawk Drive – On January 5, 2021, the City Council granted PUD General
Plan of Development and Preliminary Plat approval to Mark and Kathleen Smith for
Weston Woods of Medina. The plat proposed 76 twinhomes, 42 single-family lots, and
32 rowhome units and an outlot to be deeded to the City to preserve a maple-basswood
forest remnant. The applicant has now requested final plat approval for a significant
portion of the project. The applicant proposes to plat the area of the 32 rowhomes as an
outlot for future development, and proposes to plat and develop the remaining property as
the first phase.
See attached report.
Potential Action:
If the City Council finds that the final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary
plat and that the conditions of preliminary plat have been addressed, and that the terms
of the development agreement are consistent with the Council’s expectation at the time of
conditional Comprehensive Plan approval, the Council can take the following actions:
1. Move to adopt the resolution adopting the Weston Woods of Medina Comprehensive
Plan Amendment.
2. Move to adopt the resolution granting final plat approval for Weston Woods of Medina.
3. Move to approve the Planned Unit Development Agreement by and between the City of
Medina and Mark R. Smith and Kathleen R. Smith for Weston Woods of Medina
4
XII. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS
Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 006109E-006116E for $16,490.11
and order check numbers 052088-052122 for $112,645.71, and payroll EFT 0511362-0511396
for $54,930.58.
INFORMATION PACKET:
• Planning Department Update
• Police Department Update
• Public Works Department Update
• Claims List
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1
October 5, 2021
DRAFT 1
2
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 5, 2021 3
4
The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on October 5, 2021 at 5
7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Martin presided. 6
7
Martin read a statement explaining that the meeting is being held virtually due to the 8
ongoing pandemic. She provided instructions on how members of the public can 9
participate in the meeting. 10
11
I. ROLL CALL 12
13
Members present: Albers, Cavanaugh, DesLauriers, Martin, and Reid. 14
15
Members absent: None. 16
17
Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, Assistant City Administrator Jodi 18
Gallup, City Attorney Dave Anderson, Finance Director Erin Barnhart, City Engineer Jim 19
Stremel, City Planning Director Dusty Finke, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, and 20
Chief of Police Jason Nelson. 21
22
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:05 p.m.) 23
24
III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:05 p.m.) 25
The agenda was approved as presented. 26
27
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:05 p.m.) 28
29
A. Approval of the September 21, 2021 Work Session City Council Meeting 30
Minutes 31
Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers, to approve the September 21, 2021 work session 32
City Council meeting minutes as presented. 33
34
A roll call vote was performed: 35
36
DesLauriers aye 37
Albers aye 38
Cavanaugh aye 39
Reid aye 40
Martin aye 41
42
Motion passed unanimously. 43
44
B. Approval of the September 21, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 45
Moved by Martin, seconded by Cavanaugh, to approve the September 21, 2021 regular 46
City Council meeting minutes as presented. 47
48
A roll call vote was performed: 49
50
Reid aye 51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2
October 5, 2021
Cavanaugh aye 1
Albers aye 2
DesLauriers aye 3
Martin aye 4
5
Motion passed unanimously. 6
7
V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:07 p.m.) 8
9
A. Resolution No. 2021-65 Approving the Agreement between the City of 10
Medina and Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. Representing the Local 11
#36 Bargaining Unit for the Calendar Years 2022-2023 12
B. Resolution No. 2021-66 Accepting Donation from American Legion 13
C. Resolution No. 2021-67 Accepting Donations for Medina Celebration Day 14
Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Reid, to approve the consent agenda. 15
16
A roll call vote was performed: 17
18
Cavanaugh aye 19
Albers aye 20
Reid aye 21
DesLauriers aye 22
Martin aye 23
24
Motion passed unanimously. 25
26
VI. COMMENTS (7:09 p.m.) 27
28
A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 29
There were none. 30
31
B. Park Commission 32
Scherer reported that they have been working hard at Hunter Park and provided an 33
update. He stated that he and Finke will be visiting Deer Hill Preserve to stake the 34
proposed trail corridor. He stated that the Commission is excited to have the easements 35
in place and identify the corridor. He stated that he and Gallup met with WSB to review 36
the Lakeshore Park comments, noting that a presentation will be provided to the Park 37
Commission the following week related to all three items. 38
39
C. Planning Commission 40
Finke reported that the Planning Commission will meet the following week to hold three 41
public hearings related to a PUD concept plan for an auto condominium development; a 42
continuation of the discussion related to the sign ordinance, specifically dynamic 43
displays adjacent to arterial roadways; and an ordinance amendment related to the 44
swimming pool ordinance. 45
46
DesLauriers asked for clarification on the location for the proposed autoplex. 47
48
Finke clarified the location as west of Pioneer, between Pioneer and 19 on the south 49
side of Highway 55. 50
51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3
October 5, 2021
VII. PRESENTATIONS 1
2
A. Resolution No. 2021-68 Recognizing Assistant City Administrator Jodi 3
Gallup for 15 Years of Service to the City of Medina (7:13 p.m.) 4
Martin read a draft resolution recognizing Assistant City Administrator Jodi Gallup for 15 5
years of service to the City. She commented that she enjoys working with Gallup and 6
the talent she brings to City Hall. 7
8
Johnson stated that it is an honor and privilege to recognize Gallup for 15 years of 9
service. He commented that she is a great example of how the intern program can be 10
used to build talent and for staff to move up through the ranks. He stated that Gallup 11
wears a number of hats for the City and is a major talent and asset to the community. 12
13
Gallup commented that it has been a pleasure. 14
15
Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by DesLauriers, to Adopt Resolution No. 2021-68 16
Recognizing Assistant City Administrator Jodi Gallup for 15 Years of Service to the City 17
of Medina. 18
19
Further discussion: Cavanaugh stated that in addition to everything Gallup does for the 20
Council and City, she always brings a great attitude and a smile to everything she does. 21
22
A roll call vote was performed: 23
24
Albers aye 25
Reid aye 26
Cavanaugh aye 27
DesLauriers aye 28
Martin aye 29
30
Motion passed unanimously. 31
32
B Resolution Recognizing Public Works Water Operator Greg Leuer for 15 33
Years of Service to the City of Medina (7:20 p.m.) 34
Scherer stated that Leuer was having technology problems and was unable to attend. 35
He noted that this could be tabled or could move forward. 36
37
Johnson agreed that this should be tabled until Leuer could be on the call. 38
39
Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers, to table the Resolution Recognizing Public Works 40
Water Operator Greg Leuer for 15 Years of Service to the City of Medina to the October 41
19, 2021 meeting. 42
43
A roll call vote was performed: 44
45
DesLauriers aye 46
Albers aye 47
Cavanaugh aye 48
Reid aye 49
Martin aye 50
51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4
October 5, 2021
Motion passed unanimously. 1
2
VIII. NEW BUSINESS 3
4
A. BAPS Minneapolis LLC – 1400 Hamel Road – Site Plan Review for 5
Approximately 46,000 Square Foot Building Including Assembly, 6
Classrooms, and Ancillary Spaces (7:22 p.m.) 7
Johnson stated that the applicant is requesting approval of a site plan for construction of 8
approximately 46,000 square feet of space at 1400 Hamel Road. 9
10
Finke stated that this is a site plan review and explained that is an application to review a 11
request for compliance with the City’s land use regulations and other policies. He stated 12
that there is a relatively low level of discretion. He stated that the subject site is located 13
north of Hamel Road and east of Arrowhead Drive noting that the proposed use is a 14
religious institution which is a permitted use. He reviewed the surrounding properties 15
and uses. He provided details on the existing site conditions and proposed site layout. 16
He displayed the proposed building elevations and reviewed the proposed building 17
materials. He stated that there are portions of the building that are taller and provided 18
additional explanation on the proposed building height and how building height is 19
measured. 20
21
Martin commented that it appears that the site layout is compliant with the zoning district. 22
She referenced the building height for a sprinkled building and asked if the parapet is 23
permitted in addition to the building height. 24
25
Finke stated that generally screening things on the roof are not counted, as mechanical 26
screening is required for rooftop equipment. He noted that there are commonly items 27
that exceed from the roofline that are not counted towards building height. 28
29
Martin asked for details on the items on the corners and how high those protrude. 30
31
Finke estimated a height of about 44 feet. 32
33
Pete Moreau, project engineer, replied that the initial estimate is correct. He noted that 34
the decorative spires reach a height of 44 feet with the tallest one labeled at 50 feet. He 35
stated that the midpoint of the spires is 35 feet, which is compliant. 36
37
Martin asked if the highest point would have a flag. 38
39
Moreau replied that is correct and a flag element is shown with the actual structure 50 40
feet in height. 41
42
Martin referenced the smaller spires and asked if those would not count towards height 43
because they are not structural and are more architectural in nature. 44
45
Finke replied that those would be architectural similar to a cupola seen on many other 46
buildings. He stated that those are not counted in building height. 47
48
DesLauriers stated that currently the maximum proposed is 50 feet for the spires. He 49
asked if a height of 80 feet would be permitted. 50
51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5
October 5, 2021
Finke explained how the midpoint is calculated, noting that an 80-foot spire would not be 1
permitted. He stated that with the combination of building height and spires, 50 feet 2
would be the highest point allowed. 3
4
Albers asked for clarification on the pitch calculated. He asked if that is a standard pitch 5
roof used in the calculation. 6
7
Finke replied that is a relatively mild pitch and provided examples of other roof pitches in 8
Medina. 9
10
Reid stated that her main question was related to the height of the spires and that 11
question has been answered. 12
13
DesLauriers asked how this would compare to the Automotorplex, as they have some 14
fairly tall buildings. He asked if they are similar in size or whether the proposed spires 15
would dwarf the adjacent use. 16
17
Finke replied that the peaked roof on most of the Automotorplex building is at 35 feet 18
with cupolas extending beyond those. He stated that there are portions of those 19
buildings with peaks closer to 40 feet with cupolas on top to about 45 feet. He noted that 20
the spires would be a bit taller than the cupolas on the adjacent property. 21
22
DesLauriers stated that he attended the Planning Commission meeting and there was 23
discussion about lowering the spires to better align with the motorplex at 45 feet and 24
asked if that is an option. 25
26
Finke stated that if the Council decides that the interpretation of building height is not 27
correct, or if the applicant is willing to make that change, that could be discussed. 28
29
Albers stated that he also shared that thought about lowering the spires to 45 feet. He 30
asked the materials the spires would be made of. 31
32
Moreau replied that the spires are prefabricated galvanized aluminum. He commented 33
that they are solid and painted. 34
35
Martin asked the colors the spires would be painted. She stated that if it were a peaked 36
roof, she would be fine with the proposal as there are peaked roofs in the zoning district. 37
She stated that in this instance there is an elevation with three peaks with spires. She 38
did not believe the business park concept assumed this type of structure with things 39
going into the air to this extent. She stated that she has a struggle with allowing this 40
type of height. She stated that she tried to find other architectural features that were 41
allowed to exceed the maximum building height but was unable to find such an example. 42
She stated that she struggles with the spires as there is not a peaked roof. 43
44
DesLauriers stated that with a peaked roof there are slow declines down but, in this 45
case, there are several ups and down in elevation. 46
47
Martin stated that in the business park there are building materials that blend with the 48
rest of the building design. She stated that it would be unreasonable to permit three 49
structures 50 feet in height on a single building, particularly when the details of what 50
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 6
October 5, 2021
those might look like are unknown in comparison to the natural environment. She did 1
not believe this fits the analogy of a peaked roof. 2
3
DesLauriers agreed with the comments of Martin. 4
5
Reid stated that she also had concern with the height. She stated that she also 6
wondered what the spires would look like as the description was vague. She asked if 7
the Council would see the plan again with more detail. 8
9
Finke stated that the Council could request more information on those to consider at a 10
future meeting. He stated that there is no action proposed, other than providing direction 11
to staff to prepare a resolution of approval or denial. 12
13
Reid stated that she would want more information on the structures as they would be 14
prominent. She stated that one spire would be okay, but this would have three and they 15
do not appear to fit within the guidelines. 16
17
Cavanaugh stated that the representative of the applicant stated that the spires would be 18
hollow, aluminum, and prefabricated and asked if there is information available related to 19
wind load. 20
21
Moreau clarified that the architecture and height is based on the religious beliefs and 22
practices. He stated that the color would be white/ivory and would match the color 23
scheme of the building. He stated that there are other members of the team on the call 24
that would like to provide input. 25
26
Bharat Patel, representing the applicant, stated that they are building a Hindu place of 27
worship which is based on architecture going back thousands of years. He stated that 28
the details of the building are determined by dimensions described in scripture. He 29
stated that one feature of a Hindu place of worship is to have certain features mounted 30
that identify that as a place of worship. He stated that they are not just a set of pillars, 31
but they have a religious purpose below the roofline where prayers occur. He stated that 32
each component has a meaning of its own and provided additional details. He stated 33
that the building is sturdy to weather the elements found within the Midwest and each of 34
the seasons and weather conditions. He provided details on the structural soundness. 35
He noted that the spires are the most essential pieces of the institution in order for it to 36
be a place of worship. He stated that this would function as a place of worship, with 37
classroom space, and space for community activities and charity work. 38
39
Martin asked if three spires are required or whether one would be sufficient. 40
41
Patel explained that three spires are required and explained the purpose and meaning of 42
each of the spires. 43
44
Martin asked how many temples there are across the country. 45
46
Patel replied that there are over 100 centers across the country and provided details on 47
other locations. He noted that there are about 25 to 30 centers that would have these 48
types of features. 49
50
Martin asked if all of those temples have spires of this height. 51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 7
October 5, 2021
1
Patel confirmed that all the temples would have three spires. He noted that the height of 2
the spires is based on the location and zodiac star locations. He stated that the Los 3
Angeles location has a spire 75 feet in height. He noted that these temples add to the 4
fabric of diversity within a community. 5
6
Albers thanked Patel for providing that background information as that was helpful 7
information. 8
9
Martin asked how high a peak would need to be if there were going to be a peaked roof 10
that encased these three structures. She believed that is what should be considered for 11
the height calculation and estimated that peaks would need to extend another 30 to 40 12
feet in order to encase those spires. 13
14
DesLauriers commented that he follows that analysis and agreed with the comments of 15
Martin. 16
17
Martin commented that it seems like too much in the way of a façade and is more than 18
the code anticipated. She stated that she appreciates the details from a religious 19
perspective but was unsure this would meet the requirements of City code. She 20
believed that using a peaked roof analysis would require the spires to be encased in the 21
peaked roof. 22
23
Patel commented that if the spires are encased, that would become a big block at a 24
heightened level that would not appease anyone. He stated that they do not want 25
neighbors to see a huge roof, and that is why the design allows the natural elements to 26
be seen around the spires. 27
28
Martin stated that her comments were related to what would be required to encase the 29
spires with a peaked roof and the violation of building regulation that would occur in that 30
instance. 31
32
Reid stated that she is comfortable with the calculations as provided by staff and the 33
materials proposed for the building. She stated that she would like more information on 34
what the spires will look like. She stated that the building looks very nice and would be 35
an interesting addition to Medina. 36
37
DesLauriers stated that the staff report mentions that the applicant proposes to use that 38
method of calculation for height. He stated that using the business codes, the City 39
would use its determined method of analysis and asked staff for clarification. 40
41
Finke stated that the initial review of staff would not have gone against that calculation 42
proposed by the applicant. He stated that using the eve as part of the building height 43
calculation has to do with livable space rather than architectural details. 44
45
Martin asked staff for input on heights of other spire like elements in Medina. 46
47
Finke replied that there are some steeples that exceed 50 feet, noting that some of those 48
are historical buildings. He noted that some of the steeples exceed 70 feet. 49
50
Martin moved to building materials and design portion of the discussion. 51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 8
October 5, 2021
1
Finke stated that staff believes that certain modulation and fenestration proposed would 2
generally exceed what would be required in the zoning district. He stated that the west 3
elevation is closest to the property line and would appear to have the least amount of 4
architectural detail, therefore staff suggested additional landscaping along that façade. 5
6
Martin stated that was one of her concerns, the boxiness of the west elevation. She 7
commented on the unique uses on the west side of the property line that would look this 8
direction and agreed that landscaping would help to improve that. 9
10
Cavanaugh noted that there was a comment from a neighboring property owner, 11
discussing their hobbies in that use with vehicles and that property owner requested 12
more landscaping along the property line. He commented that would make sense for 13
both parties to provide a buffer and help absorb sound from the vehicles. 14
15
Albers stated that he generally agrees with the comments of Cavanaugh to add 16
landscaping along the western boundary. 17
18
Reid also agreed with the comments of Cavanaugh. 19
20
Finke stated that the City does have a limited amount of discretion in site plan review as 21
the intent is to review against the existing regulations and add any necessary conditions. 22
He stated that the Planning Commission reviewed the request at its last meeting and 23
similarly recommended screening along the western boundary, whether through fencing 24
or landscaping. He stated that the Commission did recommend approval of the request. 25
26
Martin commented on the mass of the building and lack of modulation on the back. She 27
was unsure there was sufficient modulation along the western elevation. She agreed 28
that additional landscaping would be helpful to mitigate that. 29
30
Albers referenced the lighting and asked if the spires would be lit at night, and if so, 31
would that be compliant with the lighting ordinance. 32
33
Finke stated that the lighting ordinance would not allow up lighting, the lighting would 34
have to be downcast. He stated that any lighting would be subject to the light trespass 35
requirements. 36
37
Moreau stated that if there were lighting on those elements, they would ensure they 38
were in compliance with the ordinance. 39
40
Patel confirmed that their lighting would be compliant with the lighting ordinance. 41
42
The Council viewed images from similar temples in other locations. Martin noted other 43
locations that do not have spires. She asked why some temples have spires while 44
others do not. She commented that she is struggling to find that the spires are compliant 45
with the City code. 46
47
Patel provided additional explanation on the use of the word temple and stated that as 48
BAPS has grown across the nation, they have built the buildings in different types and 49
styles. He highlighted different designs, noting that each locality designs based on their 50
location. He stated that this temple would be similar to the Detroit location. 51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 9
October 5, 2021
1
Martin stated that the Planning Commission did recommend approval of the site plan, so 2
now the Council must decide if it would like to approve the site plan with the 3
recommendations within the staff report, whether additional conditions should be added, 4
or whether the site plan should be denied. She stated that formal action will not be 5
taken tonight, but rather direction will be provided to staff to draft the appropriate 6
resolution. She stated that she is concerned with whether the three spires would meet 7
the building code from the perspective of height. She believed it would be appropriate to 8
request greater architectural diversity on the west elevation or the addition of 9
screening/landscaping. She asked if the applicant would agree to place additional trees 10
and screening on the west elevation. 11
12
Moreau stated that they did take the feedback from the Planning Commission seriously 13
and increased the number of trees from four to ten and would be open to increasing that 14
further is desired. 15
16
Patel confirmed that he would be willing to work with his team to address that concern. 17
18
Cavanaugh commented that there are a few ways the height for the building could be 19
viewed. He stated that if the first photo is used with the three spires side by side, looking 20
from east to west, it would probably not fit within the height requirements. He stated that 21
the second picture showing the elevation from the north side, however, would meet the 22
height requirement. He asked staff if that is a correct analysis and for additional input. 23
He stated that the adjacent property owner to the west was concerned with screening at 24
the property line to help absorb sound and prevent a nuisance or complaints in the 25
future. 26
27
Reid stated that overall, she is satisfied with the proposal. She commented that spires 28
appear tall but seeing the images from temples in other cities helped to explain the 29
purpose. She stated that she would still like additional details on the spires but was able 30
to gain more understanding from the images of the other temples. She stated that she is 31
okay with the request. 32
33
Albers commented that he did not have additional comments as the discussion has been 34
thorough and his concerns were expressed well by Martin related to height. 35
36
DesLauriers stated that overall, this is a nice design; noting that he likes the design and 37
layout. He stated that he does not know what the spires look like and that is the only 38
thing he is questioning. He stated that Cavanaugh helped to address the height concern 39
by showing it from another angle. He stated that overall, this is a great looking building. 40
He noted that this property backs up to a property owned by Loram and he is unsure of 41
their future plans. He stated that could also add noise in the future, if Loram develops 42
that, and BAPS should be aware of that potential. 43
44
Asit Waghani, president of BAPS Minneapolis, stated that they met with the CEO of 45
Loram and understand their future plans. He stated that he believes they will be able to 46
coexist and commented that it was a great discussion. 47
48
Martin stated that she appreciated the different viewpoint from the south. She stated 49
that this is not a peaked roof and is instead three individual components that exceed the 50
height. She stated that she still struggles with whether this would meet the City code. 51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 10
October 5, 2021
She asked if there is a recommended condition within the staff report related to the 1
landscaping for the west side. 2
3
Finke confirmed that additional language could be added related to the western 4
landscaping. 5
6
Martin asked if a berm would be appropriate. 7
8
Cavanaugh asked if there would be soil moved that would be in excess and could be 9
used for a berm. 10
11
Moreau commented that there is an elevation change between the property and the 12
property to the west, therefore the site sits about five feet lower than the neighboring 13
property, which provides additional screening. 14
15
Martin added additional language to be added to the condition related to lighting. She 16
asked if an additional condition should be added related to the color and design of the 17
spires. 18
19
Reid asked if it would be appropriate for the applicant to request a variance related to 20
the height. She stated that she would like to see more details on the spires, whether 21
that is done through another review or whatever method is chosen. 22
23
Martin stated that she would prefer to gather additional information on the spires and the 24
western elevation landscaping. She stated that she would also like to review the City 25
code and review how height is interpreted in other instances. She asked if it would be 26
appropriate to approve this based on the analysis of a peaked roof. She stated that she 27
would want to know what other cities have done. She asked if the applicant would be 28
willing to allow this to be tabled. 29
30
Anderson stated that the City does have the authority to extend the 60-day review period 31
for up to an additional 60 days in order to gather additional information and conduct 32
additional review. 33
34
Finke commented that there is plenty of time as the 60-day deadline expires at the end 35
of the month and therefore the City could use the 60-day extension after that deadline 36
expires. 37
38
Martin stated that she would prefer to table the request in order to gather that additional 39
information and confirmed the consensus of the Council. She asked for input from 40
Loram. 41
42
MacKenzie Mendez, representing Loram, stated that they support the request for 43
additional landscaping on both the west and north sides. She stated that there is 44
equipment moved on the current site and perhaps the additional site to the north and 45
therefore the screening would provide additional safety for the subject site users. 46
47
Patel stated that he would like the opportunity to show what the spires would look like, 48
noting that he could provide the examples from two other locations that have both a 49
place of worship and gathering space. 50
51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 11
October 5, 2021
Martin confirmed that the Council would like to see that additional information at its next 1
meeting. 2
3
Moved by Albers, seconded by Reid, to table the review based on the discussion. 4
5
A roll call vote was performed: 6
7
DesLauriers aye 8
Albers aye 9
Cavanaugh aye 10
Reid aye 11
Martin aye 12
13
Motion passed unanimously. 14
15
Martin asked if the timing would work for the applicant to have the additional information 16
submitted for the next meeting. She noted that perhaps the first meeting in November 17
would be more appropriate. 18
19
Finke asked if a specific date must be mentioned or whether staff can schedule the item 20
once the appropriate items are received and reviewed. 21
22
Anderson confirmed that staff could bring the item back when it is ready. 23
24
IX. OLD BUSINESS 25
26
A. Discussion on Meeting Options Due to the Ongoing Pandemic (9:06 p.m.) 27
Martin stated that she believes it appropriate to continue meeting virtually through the 28
end of the calendar year because of the number of COVID cases. 29
30
DesLauriers suggested removing this item from the agenda until the first meeting in 31
January so that the Council does not have to continue talking about this at every 32
meeting. 33
34
Martin confirmed that could be done and noted that if there is a reason to return to in 35
person meetings prior to that date, the item could be placed back on the agenda. 36
37
X. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (9:09 p.m.) 38
Johnson had no further comments. 39
40
XI. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (9:09 p.m.) 41
No comments. 42
43
XII. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (9:09 p.m.) 44
Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Cavanaugh, to approve the bills, EFT 006093E-45
006108E for $55,420.44, order check numbers 052048-052087 for $124,701.51, and 46
payroll EFT 0511331-0511361 for $58,659.97. 47
48
A roll call vote was performed: 49
50
DesLauriers aye 51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 12
October 5, 2021
Albers aye 1
Cavanaugh aye 2
Reid aye 3
Martin aye 4
5
Motion passed unanimously. 6
7
XIII. CLOSED SESSION: CITY ADMINISTRATOR ANNUAL PERFORMANCE 8
REVIEW, PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. SEC. 13D.05, SUBD. 3(a) 9
Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by DesLauriers, to adjourn the meeting to closes 10
session at 9:10 p.m. to conduct the City Administrator annual performance review 11
pursuant to Minn. Stat. 13D.05, Subd. 13(a). 12
13
A roll call vote was performed: 14
15
DesLauriers aye 16
Albers aye 17
Cavanaugh aye 18
Reid aye 19
Martin aye 20
21
Motion passed unanimously. 22
23
The meeting returned to open session at 9:10 p.m. 24
25
XIV. ADJOURN 26
Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Cavanaugh, to adjourn the meeting at 9:45 p.m. 27
28
A roll call vote was performed: 29
30
DesLauriers aye 31
Albers aye 32
Cavanaugh aye 33
Reid aye 34
Martin aye 35
36
Motion passed unanimously. 37
38
39
40
__________________________________ 41
Kathy Martin, Mayor 42
Attest: 43
44
____________________________________ 45
Jodi Gallup, City Clerk 46
47
Resolution No. 2021-
October 19, 2021
Member _________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT UTILITY CHARGES
TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY
AUDITOR FOR COLLECTION IN 2022
WHEREAS, the records of the Utility Funds of the City of Medina list certain accounts
as being delinquent; and
WHEREAS, the consumers have been previously notified of the delinquency in
accordance with the statutes of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute 444.075 and Section 740.23 of the Medina City Code
authorizes certification of such delinquent accounts to the Hennepin County Auditor for collection;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Medina,
Minnesota to direct the Hennepin County Auditor to place upon the tax rolls for taxes payable in
2022 the delinquent accounts which are listed in Exhibit A, attached hereto, at an interest rate of 12
percent from the date of adoption of this resolution.
Dated: October 19, 2021.
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Jodi Gallup, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _____ and
upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Agenda Item #5A
Resolution No. 2021-
October 19, 2021
2
Exhibit A
PIN PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNERS NAME PAST DUE 10% FEE BALANCE
28-118-23-13-0011 2632 MORNINGSIDE RD PINPOINT HOMES LLC $860.46 $86.05 $946.51
12-118-23-41-0022 3482 SIOUX DR EDMAN, MATTHEW $388.30 $38.83 $427.13
12-118-23-31-0020 585 HAMEL RD MCGLENNAN PROPERTIES $101.73 $10.17 $111.90
12-118-23-24-0002 582 STATE HWY NO 55 TATE, JEFFREY J.$55.93 $5.59 $61.52
01-118-23-11-0013 160 BERGAMOT DR ABRAMSON, NANCY $132.12 $13.21 $145.33
12-118-23-14-0047 3717 LILAC DR CASSIDY, THOMAS/NANNETTE $219.21 $21.92 $241.13
02-118-23-44-0099 873 MEANDER CT SARMOSI LLC $2,070.23 $207.02 $2,277.25
02-118-23-41-0003 4345 CO RD NO 116 BIG STONE PROPERTY SOLUTIONS $30.27 $3.03 $33.30
02-118-23-43-0024 1073 JUBERT TR ELIAS, RAMSEY $58.84 $5.88 $64.72
12-118-23-43-0046 3238 BUTTERNUT DR CALLI, BRAD $410.92 $41.09 $452.01
13-118-23-11-0020 3121 WILD FLOWER TR BITZER, TRACY/MIKE $33.78 $3.38 $37.16
02-118-23-34-0028 4130 FESCUE DR O'BRIEN, KELLY $73.02 $7.30 $80.32
12-118-23-43-0122 3405 BUTTERNUT DR ROALDSON, JULIA $681.55 $68.16 $749.71
01-118-23-33-0005 4140 FAIRWAY DRIVE HUNTER, JAMES $241.70 $24.17 $265.87
03-118-23-32-0008 4380 CHIPPEWA COURT LUNSKI DEVELOPMENT MEDINA LLC $72.86 $7.29 $80.15
03-118-23-32-0010 4320 CHIPPEWA COURT LUNSKI DEVELOPMENT MEDINA LLC $72.86 $7.29 $80.15
18-118-23-24-0137 2851 LAKESHORE AVE WARNER, THOMAS/TAMARA $94.81 $9.48 $104.29
18-118-23-22-0192 3112 LAKESHORE AVE ROBINSON, GREG $2,806.71 $280.67 $3,087.38
18-118-23-21-0017 4525 WALNUT ST ROBERTS, JOE $2,297.99 $229.80 $2,527.79
28-118-23-13-0011 2632 MORNINGSIDE RD PINPOINT HOMES $59.08 $5.91 $64.99
28-118-23-13-0006 2662 BOBOLINK RD BERGQUIST, TIMOTHY $178.35 $17.84 $196.19
28-118-23-14-0018 2495 BOBOLINK RD HANSON, MICHAEL $800.77 $80.08 $880.85
TOTAL $11,741.49 $1,174.15 $12,915.64
Resolution No. 2021-
October 19, 2021
Member _______ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT STORM WATER UTILITY CHARGES
TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY
AUDITOR FOR COLLECTION IN 2022
WHEREAS, the records of the Storm Water Utility Funds of the City of Medina list
certain accounts as being delinquent; and
WHEREAS, the consumers have been previously notified of the delinquency in
accordance with the statutes of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute 444.075 and Section 740.23 of the Medina City Code
authorizes certification of such delinquent accounts to the Hennepin County Auditor for collection;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Medina,
Minnesota to direct the Hennepin County Auditor to place upon the tax rolls for taxes payable in
2022 the delinquent accounts which are listed in Exhibit A, attached hereto, at an interest rate of 12
percent from the date of adoption of this resolution.
Dated: October 19, 2021.
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Jodi Gallup, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _____ and
upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Agenda Item #5B
Resolution No. 2021-
October 19, 2021
2
Exhibit A
PIN PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNERS NAME PAST DUE 10% FEE BALANCE
02-118-23-21-0001 PID 02-118-23-21-0001 EIDE, CLINTON $66.58 $6.66 $73.24
02-118-23-22-0002 1555 HACKAMORE RD EIDE, CLINTON $66.58 $6.66 $73.24
03-118-23-22-0002 2400 CATES RANCH DR CATES, JEFFREY $66.58 $6.66 $73.24
04-118-23-11-0002 2590 CATES RANCH DR CATES, JEFFREY $199.68 $19.97 $219.65
04-118-23-14-0004 2575 CATES RANCH DR CATES, JEFFREY $133.11 $13.31 $146.42
04-118-23-14-0005 PID 04-118-23-14-0005 CATES, JEFFREY $66.58 $6.66 $73.24
06-118-23-22-0003 80 ADDRESS PENDING SCHUMACHER, ROSEMARIE $307.88 $30.79 $338.67
11-118-23-14-0002 PID 11-118-23-14-0002 ALCAMACHI CORPORATION $106.50 $10.65 $117.15
11-118-23-33-0006 1495 HAMEL ROAD VANG, MATTHEW YA $66.58 $6.66 $73.24
11-118-23-33-0007 1405 HAMEL ROAD VONBANK, DAVID $66.58 $6.66 $73.24
12-118-23-24-0001 592 STATE HWY NO 55 HILL, BRYCE $66.58 $6.66 $73.24
12-118-23-32-0001 705 HAMEL RD STAUBER & ROSATI LLC $66.58 $6.66 $73.24
12-118-23-44-0007 PID 12-118-23-44-0007 OLSEN, JACOB/ERIN $66.58 $6.66 $73.24
13-118-23-31-0008 545 MEDINA RD BERGERON, CODY $62.77 $6.28 $69.05
13-118-23-43-0015 2442 HOLY NAME DR PRIGGE, CHRISTOPHER $62.77 $6.28 $69.05
14-118-23-44-0008 985 MEDINA RD FOXTAIL FARM LLC $125.49 $12.55 $138.04
16-118-23-41-0009 2672 WILLOW DR L AND R NEVERLAND LLC $62.77 $6.28 $69.05
18-118-23-21-0016 4525 WALNUT ST ROBERTS, JOE $76.99 $7.70 $84.69
18-118-23-22-0191 PID 18-118-23-22-0191 BJORKLUND, MARCUS/BRIDGET $76.99 $7.70 $84.69
22-118-23-23-0004 2232 CO RD NO 24 SCHERER, ROBERT $62.77 $6.28 $69.05
23-118-23-12-0002 2322 TAMARACK DR SORENSON, ANDREW $62.77 $6.28 $69.05
23-118-23-24-0004 2175 TAMARACK DR KOSTIAL, BRAD $62.77 $6.28 $69.05
24-118-23-42-0001 PID 24-118-23-42-0001 SJ GROVES & SONS CO $62.77 $6.28 $69.05
TOTAL $2,065.25 $206.53 $2,271.78
Agenda Item #5C
HC# A2110788
2. PROJECT/PROGRAM
A. The Parties shall cooperate and collaborate to perform services associated with the
Embedded SSW Program (the "Program"), as further described and outlined in Exhibit A:
Description of Services.
B. The Parties shall perform at all times in accordance with the provisions herein, including
but not limited to the data provisions.
3. TERM OF THE AGREEMENT
The term of this Agreement shall be from January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2023, unless
terminated earlier in accordance with the cancellation/termination provisions of this
Agreement.
4. CONSIDERATION
A. Funding provided via each POLICE DEPARTMENT at ($8,600.00) eight thousand six
hundred dollars annually.
B. The SSW will be hired, employed, and equipped by HSPHD and participate in supervision
and training by HSPHD in accordance with local, state, federal, and professional licensure
requirements.
C. HSPHD shall, on the first day of each year, submit an invoice to each POLICE
DEPARTMENT for the cost of their portion assigned to the Program annually.
D. Each POLICE DEPARTMENT will make payment within thirty-five (35) days from
receipt of the invoice. If the invoice is incorrect, defective, or otherwise improper, POLICE
DEPARTMEMT will notify HSPHD within ten (10) days of receiving the incorrect
invoice. Upon receiving the corrected invoice from HSPHD, POLICE DEPARTMENT
will make payment within thirty-five (35) days.
E. Further, the Parties expressly agree that neither this Agreement nor any Party's
performance hereunder obligates or commits any Party to enter a subsequent contract or
engagement with any other.
5. LIABILITY AND NOTICE
A. Each Party shall be liable for its own acts and the results thereof to the extent provided by
law and, further, each Party shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless each other
(including their present and former officials, officers, agents, employees, volunteers, and
subcontractors), from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses,
costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting directly or indirectly
from any act or omission of the Party, anyone directly or indirectly employed by it, and/or
anyone for whose acts and/or omissions it may be liable, in the performance or failure to
2
HC# A2110788
perform its obligations under this Agreement. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 466 shall apply to any tort claims brought against COUNTY and/or CITIES as a
result of this Agreement.
B. To the fullest extent permitted by law, action by the Parties to this Agreement is intended
to be and shall be construed as a "cooperative activity" and it is the intent of the Parties
that they shall be a deemed a "single governmental unit" for the purposes of liability, as set
forth in Minnesota Statutes, section 471.59, subdivision 1 a(a), provided further that for
purposes of that statute, each Party to this Agreement expressly declines responsibility for
the acts or omissions of the other Party to this Agreement except to the extent they have
agreed in writing to be responsible for the acts or omissions of the other Party. The total
liability for the Parties shall not be added together to exceed the limits on governmental
liability for a single governmental unit.
C. Duty to Notify: Each Party shall promptly notify the other Parties of any actual or suspected
claim, action, cause of action, administrative action, criminal arrest, criminal charge, or
litigation brought against the party, its present and former officials, officers, agents,
employees, volunteers, and subcontractors which arises out of this Agreement.
6. INSURANCE
Each Party warrants that it has a purchased insurance or operates under a self-insurance
program in accordance with applicable law and sufficient to manage potential liability arising
hereunder, including but not limited to workers compensation insurance.
7. INDEPENDENT PARTIES
A. It is understood that the relationship between COUNTY and POLICE DEPARTMENTS
as to the subject matter of this Agreement constitutes only the understandings set forth in
this Agreement.
B. It is further agreed that, notwithstanding any other formal, written agreements or contracts
which may exist between COUNTY and POLICE DEPARTMENTS, nothing is intended
or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of partners
between the Parties hereto or as constituting any Party as the agent, representative, or
employee of any other for any purpose or in any manner whatsoever. Each Party is to be
and shall remain an independent contractor with respect to all services performed under
this Agreement. Each Party will secure at its own expense all personnel required in
performing services under this Agreement. Any personnel of a Party or other persons
engaged in the performance of any work or services required by that Party shall have no
contractual relationship with any other Party and will not be considered employees of
another Party. No Party shall be responsible for any claims related to or on behalf of any
of the other Parties' personnel, including without limitation, claims that arise out of
employment or alleged employment under the Minnesota Unemployment Insurance Law
(Minnesota Statutes Chapter 268) or the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act
(Minnesota Statutes Chapter 176), or claims of discrimination arising out of state, local, or
federal law, against a Party, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees. Such personnel
or other persons shall neither require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights, or benefits
3
HC# A2110788
of any kind from the other party, including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and
hospital care, sick and vacation leave, workers' compensation, unemployment
compensation, disability, severance pay, and retirement benefits.
8. NONDISCRIMINATION
In accordance with COUNTY's policies against discrimination, the Parties shall not exclude any
person from full employment rights or participation in, or the benefits of, any program, service or
activity on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, gender expression,
gender identity, age, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, or public assistance status. No
person who is protected by applicable law against discrimination shall be subjected to
discrimination.
9. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY
Except as herein specifically provided, no other person, customer, employee, or invitee of any
Party or any other third party shall be deemed to be a third party beneficiary of any of the
provisions herein.
10. DATA
COUNTY and POLICE DEPARTMENTS, their officers, agents, owners, partners, employees,
volunteers and subcontractors, shall abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Government
Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, and all other applicable state and federal
law, rules, regulations and orders relating to data privacy, confidentiality, disclosure of
information, medical records or other health and enrollment information, and as any of the
same may be amended, as well as the data and data sharing provisions set forth in Exhibit A.
The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement.
11. RECORDS — AVAILABILITY/ACCESS
Subject to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes section 16C.05, subd. 5, the Parties, the State
Auditor, or any of their authorized representatives, at any time during normal business hours,
and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to
examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., of the
Parties which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of the Parties and
involve transactions relating to this Agreement. The Parties shall maintain thesematerials and
allow access during the period of this Agreement and for six (6) years after its expiration,
cancellation or termination.
12. MERGER. MODIFICATION, AND SEVERABILITY
A. The entire understanding between the Parties is contained herein and supersedes all oral
agreements and negotiations between the Parties relating to the subject matter. All items
that are referenced or that are attached are incorporated and made a part of this Agreement.
If there is any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and referenced or attached
items, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail.
4
HC# A2110788
B. Any alterations, variations or modifications of the provisions of this Agreement shall only
be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed
by the Parties. Except as expressly provided, the substantive legal terms contained in this
Agreement including but not limited to Indemnification; Liability and Notice; Merger,
Modification and Severability; Default and Cancellation/Termination or Minnesota Law
Governs may not be altered, varied, modified or waived by any change order,
implementation plan, scope of work, development specification or other development
process or document.
C. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the remaining
provisions will not be affected.
13. DEFAULT AND CANCELLATION/TERMINATION
A If any Party fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement, fails to administer
the work so as to endanger the performance of the Agreement or otherwise breaches or
fails to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement, it shall be in default. Unless the
Party's default is excused in writing by the non -defaulting Parties, the non -defaulting
Parties may upon written notice immediately cancel or terminate this Agreement as to the
defaulting Party or in its entirety.
B. This Agreement may be canceled/terminated with or without cause by any Party as to that
Party, upon thirty (30) days written notice. Any Party may immediately cancel or terminate
this Agreement as to that Party if the terminating party determines that the health and
welfare of a member of the public is at risk. Upon cancellation/termination of this
Agreement in its entirety, property or surplus money, if any, acquired as a result of the
operation of this Agreement shall be distributed to the Parties in proportion to contributions
of the Parties.
C. Any Party's failure to insist upon strict performance of any provision or to exercise any
right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a relinquishment or waiver of the same,
unless consented to in writing. Such consent shall not constitute a general waiver or
relinquishment throughout the entire term of the Agreement.
D. The above remedies shall be in addition to any other right or remedy available to any party
under this Agreement, law, statute, rule, and/or equity.
14. NOTICES
Unless the Parties otherwise agree in writing, any notice or demand which must be given or
made by a Party under this Agreement or any statute or ordinance shall be in writing, and shall
be sent registered or certified mail. Notices to COUNTY shall be sent to the County
Administrator at the address given in the opening paragraph of this Agreement with copies to
HSPHD asdetailed below. Notice to POLICE DEPARTMENTS shall be sent to the address
stated in the opening paragraph of this Agreement with a copy as detailed below.
5
HC# A2110788
HSPHD:
Leah Kaiser
Senior Department Administrator
Hennepin County
300 South 6th Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487
leah.kaiser(a: hennep in.us
CORCORAN
Matt Gottschalk
Chief of Police
8200 County Road 116
Corcoran, Minnesota 55340
mgottschalk( ci.corcoran.mn.us
DEEP HAVEN
Cory Johnson
Chief of Police
20225 Cottagewood Road
Excelsior, Minnesota 55331
corvi (?a,deephavenpolice. com
MEDINA
Jason Nelson
Chief of Police
600 Clydesdale Trail
Medina, Minnesota 55340
j ason.nelsontimedinamn.gov
MINNETRISTA
Paul Falls
Chief of Police
7651 County Road 110 West
Minnetrista, Minnesota 55364
pfalls(ei: ci.minnetrista.mn.us
ORONO
Corey Farniok
Chief of Police
2730 Kelley Parkway
Orono, Minnesota 55356
cfarniok,ri ci.orono.mn.us
SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Justin Ballsrud
Interim Chief of Police
24150 Smithtown Road
Shorewood, Minnesota 55301
6
HC# A2110788
mmeehan i. y.southlakepd.com
WAYZATA
Marc Schultz
Chief of Police
600 Rice Street East
Wayzata, Minnesota 55391
mschultz@wayzata.org
15. SURVIVAL OF PROVISIONS
Provisions that by their nature are intended to survive the term, cancellation or termination of
this Agreement do survive such term, cancellation or termination. Such provisions include but
are not limited to: INDEPENDENT PARTIES; LIABILITY AND NOTICE; INSURANCE;
DATA; RECORDS-AVAILABILITY/ACCESS; DEFAULT AND
CANCELLATION/TERMINATION; MARKETING AND PROMOTIONAL
LITERATURE; and MINNESOTA LAW GOVERNS.
16. MARKETING AND PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE
POLICE DEPARTMENTS agree that the terms, "Hennepin County" and "Hennepin County
Human Services and Public Health Department', the name of any elected official, or any
derivatives thereof, shall not be utilized in any promotional literature or advertisements of any
type without the express prior written consent of COUNTY.
17. MINNESOTA LAWS GOVERN
The laws of the state of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning
the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations between the Parties and
their performance. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation will be those
courts located within the County of Hennepin, state of Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the
federal courts involving the Parties will be in the appropriate federal court within the state of
Minnesota.
(The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.)
7
HC# A2110788
The parties hereto agree to be bound by the provisions set forth in this Agreement.
Reviewed for COUNTY by the County STATE OF MINNESOTA
Attorney's Office
By:
Chair of Its County Board
Date:
ATTEST:
Deputy/Clerk of County Board
Date:
By:
Director/Assistant/Deputy/County
Administrator
Date:
CORCORAN
t � i_-
By: McKe ct6, 02119:1OCDn
Title: Mayor
Date: Oct 6, 2021
By:
Title:
Date:
DEEP HAVEN
Z7la
By: Dana H. Young (Oct 6, 202 •aaCDT)
Title: City Administrator
Date: Oct 6, 2021
8
HC# A2110788
By:
Title:
Date:
MEDINA / 'e
7ea,&.,:,
By: Kathleen M. Martin (Oct 6, 2021 20:24 CDT)
Title: Mayor
Date: Oct 6, 2021
MINNETRISTA
By:
Title:
Date:
By:
Title:
Date:
ORONO
By:
Title:
Date:
SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA
By: Justin Ballsrud (0ct6, 2021 15:54 CDT)
Title: Interim Chief of Police
Date: Oct 6, 2021
9
HC# A2110788
WAYZATA
L76, 2 k1
By: Jeffrey Dahl (0.1ct 6, 202115:15 CDT)
Title: City Manager
Date: Oct 6, 2021
By:
Title:
Date:
10
Contract #A2110788
EXHIBIT A: Description of Services
POLICE DEPARTMENTS and HSPHD staff will work collaboratively to prevent
reoccurrences of emergency crises.
Roles and Responsibilities of Parties
A. POLICE DEPARTMENTS will provide office space for the Senior Social Worker (SSW).
B. POLICE DEPARTMENTS will run DSL lines at designated office space, as needed, if SSW
is otherwise unable to access to COUNTY network.
C. POLICE DEPARTMENTS will work with the HSPHD Social Work Unit
Supervisor (SWUS) to establish criteria for referrals.
D. POLICE DEPARTMENTS will work with the SWUS to develop a referral process.
E. POLICE DEPARTMENTS will track referrals and repeat calls.
F. POLICE DEPARTMENTS will track mental health calls that involve weapons, use of force
and transportation holds being written.
G. POLICE DEPARTMENTS will accompany the SSW to home visits as needed.
H. HSPHD will be responsible for providing the SSW with equipment that is
necessary for completing their work. This includes but is not limited to laptop
computer, cell phone, and office supplies.
I. The SSW will report directly to the HSPHD SWUS.
J. HSPHD will be responsible for transportation/mileage expenses for the SSW.
The SSW will be responsible following the HSPHD transportation/mileage
reimbursement policies.
K. The SSW will provide short-term assistance to individuals in order to connect
the individuals with internal and/or community resources to help meet their
needs. Services will be provided in an ethical and culturally sensitive manner.
L. After being assigned a case, the SSW will complete a file clearance of the various
systems to determine if the individual is open to social services, county of
financial responsibility, and public assistance programs.
1
Contract #A2110788
EXHIBIT A: Description of Services
M. The SSW will meet the individual, assess the individual's needs, note
formal and informal supports, and determine where gaps exist.
N. The SSW will request a new or updated diagnostic assessments as needed.
0. The initial assessment should include the risks to the safety and stability of the
individual as well as the individual's ability to address such concerns. The SSW
will also evaluate the need for emergency services and if needed will assist in
making those connections.
P. The SSW will work with the individual to develop an initial plan that addresses
gaps that exist in the individual's support system and will work with the
individual to identify and connect with community resources. This plan will be
signed by both the individual and the SSW.
Q. The SSW will ensure that release of information forms are signed and that other
paperwork is completed in a timely manner.
R. Client information can only be shared with law enforcement when there is an ongoing
emergency situation and the client information is necessary to protect the health or safety of
the individual or other people. Information disclosed would be limited to that necessary to
address the emergency situation.
S. If community and/or county resources are needed, the SSW will collect
information needed to determine eligibility for those services. The SSW will
facilitate referrals to appropriate resources.
T. The SSW will collaborate with other involved parties as indicated.
U. If eligible for county operated or contracted case management services, the
SSW will complete the necessary paperwork to transfer the individual to case
management.
V. The SSW will document all activities and data as requested for tracking
purposes.
W. Participation is voluntary, and the individual served has a right to refuse services.
2
Contract #A2110788
EXHIBIT A: Description of Services
Goals of the Police -Mental Health UnitS include, but are not limited to:
A. More timely engagement of SSW with individuals;
B. Increased use of community resources to support individuals;
C. Increased use of public assistance programs;
D. Increased use of non -urgent health care systems;
E. Improved engagement of current service providers;
F. Ongoing collaboration and learning between HSPHD and POLICE DEPARTMENTS;
G. Improving the quality of life for those have encounters with law enforcement;
H. Reducing use of force, injury or death to officers and community members;
I. Reducing rate of arrests/prosecution of persons in mental health crisis and increase
the number of persons who remain in community settings with services and
supports;
J. Creating cost -savings through reduction of incarceration and hospitalizationresulting
from mental health crisis;
K. Reducing repeat calls and visits for the same issue;
L. Improving efficacy of law enforcement response to emergency and
non -emergency mental health issues; and
M. Increasing public satisfaction with the response to mental health emergencies and
other metrics developed utilizing key stakeholder and community input.
3
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jim Stremel, City Engineer
DATE: October 14, 2021
MEETING: October 19, 2021
SUBJECT: Feasibility Study for Water Treatment Plant Improvements
Background:
At the September 15, 2021 City Council Meeting, public works staff discussed the water
treatment plant ongoing condition and potential upgrades to address existing deficiencies with
the filter media, elevated levels of certain elements, future water supply demands for the system,
and consider potential permitting regulation changes. With this discussion, staff recommended
that a feasibility study be initiated to review these needs.
In response, WSB is happy to offer the enclosed proposal to provide a feasibility study to
complete a water treatment plant expansion study, prepare estimated costs of the various
improvements proposed, and include a schedule for completing the capital improvements.
Enclosed is the full proposal with a detailed project scope and fee breakdown.
City Council Action Requested:
Consider the proposal from WSB for engineering services and authorize staff to proceed with the
feasibility study for the not-to-exceed amount of $14,958.
Agenda Item #5D
October 12, 2021
Mr. Scott Johnson
City Administrator
City of Medina
2052 County Rd 24
Medina, MN 55340
Re: Proposal for Professional Engineering Services
Water Treatment Plant Expansion Study
City of Medina, Minnesota
Dear Scott:
Recent water demands have required the City of Medina to operate its Water Treatment Plant for
extended periods of time. Preliminary water demand projections are showing that the City’s
treatment capacity could eventually be exceeded unless improvements are implemented by the
City. Additional treatment capacity should be evaluated to allow the City to meet its projected
water demands. WSB & Associates, Inc. (WSB) is pleased to submit this proposal to complete a
water treatment plant expansion study and provide estimated costs. A timeline will also be
developed to implement the proposed improvements. Please review the proposed scope of
services and fees for providing the professional engineering services as detailed below and, if
approved, please provide us with a signed copy of this letter as authorization to begin the work.
Scope of Work
WSB will provide the following scope of work for this study:
1.Study the city’s current water demands and future water demand projections and review
the current raw water manganese concentrations at each well with respect to the
recommended health limits.
2.Provide a site visit to the existing water treatment plant and review the original design
drawings and evaluate options to expand the plant to increase its water treatment capacity.
The filter media core sampling data obtained by the city will also be reviewed and
compared to the data from the original media installation with respect to media depths.
3.Prepare construction cost estimates for the proposed improvements to increase the water
treatment plant’s capacity. Cost estimates will also be provided to replace the existing filter
media with new filter media.
4.Prepare a timeline to implement the recommended improvements to increase the water
treatment plant’s capacity.
5.Summarize the study options and results in a technical memorandum report.
6.Attend a meeting with city staff to discuss the report and recommendations.
7.Prepare a presentation for city staff and the city council and present the finding of study
during a work session or city council meeting.
Mr. Scott Johnson
October 12, 2021
Page 2
Estimated Fees
We propose to complete the scope of services outlined within this proposal for an hourly, not-to-
exceed fee of $14,932 as summarized in the attached fee spreadsheet. The study will be
completed within six weeks of receiving authorization to proceed.
This letter represents our understanding of the project scope. Design, bidding, and construction
services are not included in this project scope. If you are in agreement, please sign on the space
provided and return one original signed copy to us for our records. We will start immediately
upon receipt of the signed agreement
If you have any questions concerning the work plan or fee as discussed herein, please feel free to
contact us. We look forward to working with you and greatly appreciate the opportunity to assist
the City of Medina in the completion of this project.
Sincerely,
WSB
Jim Stremel, P.E. Greg Johnson, P.E.
Senior Project Manager Director of Water/Wastewater
City of Medina:
_________________________________
Authorized signature
_________________________________
Title
_________________________________
Date
Project Manager Project Engineer City Engineer Admin
Technician
Greg Johnson Ursinio Puga Jim Stremel Karla Pederson
1
Study the city’s current water demands and future water demand projections and review
the current raw water manganese concentrations at each well with respect to the
recommended health limits. 1 3 1 5 723.00$
2
drawings and evaluate options to expand the plant to increase its water treatment
capacity.14 16 30 4,574.00$
3
Prepare construction cost estimates for the proposed options described above including
the raw transmission mains between the wells and plants and indirect costs. 4 16 20 2,724.00$
4
Prepare a timeline to implement the recommended improvements to increase the water
treatment plant’s capacity. 1 1 2 309.00$
5 Summarize the study options and results in a technical memorandum report.6 16 1 4 27 3,628.00$
6 Attend a meeting with city staff to discuss the report and recommendations. 3 3 3 9 1,425.00$
7
Prepare a presentation for city staff and the city council and present the finding of study
during a work session or city council meeting. 3 4 3 10 1,549.00$
32 59 8 4 103
185.00$ 124.00$ 166.00$ 92.00$
5,920.00$ 7,316.00$ 1,328.00$ 368.00$ 14,932.00$
Fee Estimate
City of Medina
Professional Services to Complete
Water Treatment Plant Expansion Study
DescriptionTask
No.
Total WSB Direct Labor Costs
Total
Hours
Total Labor
Cost
Total Hours
Estimated Hours
Hourly Billing Rate
C:\Users\gjohnson\Music\Projects\Proposals\Water Treatment Plant Study Proposals\Medina WTP Expansion Study\Medina Water Treatment Plant Expansion Study Fees_10-11-21
1
WORK COMPLETION AND ESCROW AGREEMENT FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4650 MAPLE STREET
This WORK COMPLETION AND ESCROW AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and
entered into this ____ day of _____________, 2021 by and among Steven Bartz and Jennifer Bartz,
a married couple (collectively, the “Owners”), and the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal
corporation (the “City”).
RECITALS
A. The Owners are fee owners of the real property located at 4650 Maple Street, Medina, Minnesota,
55359 and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”).
B. The Owners desire to construct a single-family detached dwelling (the “Dwelling”) on the
Property, which is a permitted use in the Property’s underlying zoning district.
C. Pursuant to Medina City Code, section 828.51, subd. 2, all single-family detached dwellings in
the City are required to accommodate two off-street parking spaces within an attached garage
with a minimum area of 440 square feet.
D. Although the Owners intend to construct the Dwelling during the fall of 2021, the Owners have
indicated that construction of the required attached garage (the “Required Garage”) cannot
reasonably be completed prior to the winter season.
E. Notwithstanding their inability to construct the Required Garage before winter, the Owners desire
to obtain a temporary certificate of occupancy from the City to allow the Dwelling to be occupied
prior to completion of the Required Garage.
F. The City is willing to issue said temporary certificate of occupancy notwithstanding the
incompletion of the Required Garage pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties hereto
agree and stipulate as follows:
1. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. Provided that all other state and local requirements are
satisfied, the City agrees that a temporary certificate of occupancy may be issued by its building
official for the Dwelling notwithstanding the Owners’ inability to construct the Required Garage
Agenda Item #5E
2
on condition that the Owners comply with all terms and conditions of this Agreement and each of
the following:
(a) The Owners agree to fully construct the Required Garage by the Completion Deadline, as that
term is defined in section 2 of this Agreement;
(b) The Owners provide the City with an Escrow, as defined and required in section 4 of this
Agreement; and
(c) The Owners pay the City for its administrative costs, as required in section 6 of this
Agreement.
2. Required Garage. The Owners agree to construct the Required Garage, in accordance with the
plans approved by the City and all applicable state and local laws, requirements, and regulations,
by no later than August 1, 2022 (the “Completion Deadline”). The Required Garage shall not be
considered complete until the City confirms, upon inspection by its building official, that it has
been properly constructed in accordance with all requirements of the state building code and local
regulations. If the City determines that the Required Garage is not satisfactorily complete, the
Owners shall be required to perform such corrective or additional work as identified by the City
to complete the Required Garage.
3. City’s Rights. The City shall retain throughout the term of this Agreement a right of entry upon
the Property to enforce all terms and conditions contained herein. The City shall have the right,
but not the obligation, to enter the Property at all reasonable times to inspect the Property and,
upon a failure by the Owners to complete construction of the Required Garage by the
aforementioned Completion Deadline, to construct the Required Garage. The City shall make
reasonable efforts to notify the Owners before any work shall commence; provided, however, that
any inability to make contact with the Owners following such reasonable efforts shall in no way
affect the City’s rights herein. Nothing in this Agreement shall create liability on behalf of the
City for entering onto the Property or constructing the Required Garage, the design of which shall
be determined by the City in its sole discretion, and the Owner shall have no right to recover any
damages, at law or in equity, for such activities if done in accordance with the terms contained
herein.
4. Costs; Cash Escrow. The Owners agree that all costs for the construction of the Required
Garage, irrespective of whether performed by the Owners or the City, must be paid by Owners.
The City shall assume no cost, either directly or indirectly, for the construction of the Required
Garage. In order to ensure completion of the Required Garage pursuant to this Agreement and to
satisfy any current or future costs to the City that may be necessary if the Owners default on their
obligations hereunder, the Owners agree to deliver to the City immediately upon the execution of
this Agreement $102,752.22 (the “Escrow”), which amount represents the estimated cost to the
City should it have to exercise its right to enter onto the Property and construct the Required
Garage, including all incidental costs associated therewith. The Escrow shall remain in a non-
interest bearing account held by the City until released by the City. The Escrow may be used by
the City to complete construction of the Required Garage on the Property and to pay any fees or
costs otherwise due from the Owners to the City pursuant to this Agreement. The City may draw
upon the Escrow to pay any costs or expenses it may incur related to constructing the Required
Garage, as well as any costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, that the City may incur to
enforce this Agreement and to recover its costs should the Owners default on their obligations
herein. If the Escrow is not sufficient to cover the City’s costs incurred, the Owners shall be
required to reimburse the City for any unreimbursed costs within 30 days of being invoiced by
3
the City. The City agrees to release the Escrow balance upon termination of this Agreement and
satisfaction of all of the Owners’ remaining duties under this Agreement in accordance with
section 5.
In the event the City does not recover all of its costs under the provisions of this section 4, as an
additional remedy, the City may, at its option, assess the Property in the manner provided by
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 429, and the Owners hereby consent to the levy of such special
assessment without notice or hearing and waive their rights to appeal such assessments pursuant
to Minnesota Statues, section 429.081, provided that the amount levied, together with the Escrow
deposited with the City under this section, does not exceed the expenses actually incurred by the
City. Further, the City may, at its option, as an additional remedy, recover such expenses actually
incurred by the City as service charges, in the manner provided by Minnesota Statutes, sections
415.01, 366.011, and 366.012, and the Owners hereby consent and agree that any such
unreimbursed costs shall constitute a service fee the City may collect as provided pursuant to the
above-referenced statutes and the Owners further consent to the levy of such assessment without
notice or hearing and waive their rights to appeal such assessments pursuant to Minnesota Statues,
provided the amount levied does not exceed the expenses actually incurred by the City pursuant
to this Agreement. This section 4 shall survive termination of this Agreement and shall be binding
on the Owners regardless of the enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement.
5. Release of Escrow. On or before the Completion Deadline, the Owners will notify the City that
the Required Garage has been completed. Upon receipt of such notification, the City’s building
official shall arrange for an inspection of the Required Garage to determine compliance with all
requirements. If the inspection determines that the Required Garage has not been satisfactorily
completed, the building official shall notify the Owners and City staff of any outstanding
components that are required to satisfactorily complete construction. If and when the building
official verifies that the Required Garage has been satisfactorily completed, the City shall issue a
check for the release, without interest, of the Escrow balance to the Owners.
6. Administrative Costs. In addition to the Escrow, the Owners agree to pay $500 to the City to
reimburse it for the legal and administrative costs incurred to draft, process, record and administer
this Agreement. The Owners shall pay this amount to the City immediately upon execution of
this Agreement.
7. Representations and Acknolwedgments. The Owners represent that they are fee owners of the
Property, that they have full legal power and authority to encumber the Property as provided in
this Agreement, that in doing so they are not in violation of the terms or conditions of any
instrument or agreement of any nature to which the Owners are bound or which relates in any
manner to the Property. By signing this Agreement, the Owners grant the City a license, and such
other permissions as may be required, to enter the Property as needed to conduct inspections and
to construct the Required Garage, as otherwise provided for and authorized in this Agreement.
The Owners understand and acknowledge that, pursuant to the Medina City Code, all single-
family detached dwellings in the City are required to have an attached garage that is at least 440
square feet in size and that can accommodate at least two off-street parking spaces. The Owners
will design the Dwelling in a manner that will accommodate the Required Garage and, upon the
eventual completion of the Required Garage, the Dwelling and the Required Garage will adhere
to all state and local requirements. Additionally, the Owners further agree and acknowledge that
until the Required Garage is constructed, the Owners will be out of compliance with the
aforementioned requirement and the remedies expressly provided to the City to address said
noncompliance are not exclusive, meaning that following the Completion Deadline, the City shall
4
have the right, but not the obligation, to exercise any other rights that it may have, whether or not
contained herein, in law or in equity, to enforce its code requirements.
8. Liability; Indemnification. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, the
City, its officers, agents, and employees shall not be liable or responsible in any manner to the
Owners, Owners’ successors or assigns, the Owners’ contractor or subcontractors, material
suppliers, laborers, or to any other person or persons for any claim, demand, damage, or cause of
action of any kind or character arising out of or by reason of the execution of this Agreement or
the performance of this Agreement, or the City’s exercise of its rights under this Agreement, nor
will Owners make any claim against the City for or on account of any injury, loss or damage
resulting from Owners’ Property or use thereof.
The Owners agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless and defend the City, its officials,
employees, contractors and agents from and against any and all liability, loss, costs, damages,
expenses, claims, actions or judgments, including attorneys’ fees which Owners or their
contractors and subcontractors may hereinafter sustain, incur, or be required to pay, arising out of
by reason of any act or failure to act by Owners, its officers, employees, agents or contractors or
arising out of or by reason of this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver
or limitation of any immunity or limitation on liability to which the City is entitled under
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466, or otherwise.
9. Termination. This Agreement shall terminate once construction of the Required Garage is
completed, the City has been fully reimbursed for all costs and expenses it may incur as provided
herein, and the City has returned the Escrow balance to the Owners.
10. Miscellaneous Provisions.
a. Covenant; Assignment. The promises and obligations contained within this Agreement
are covenants running with the Property and are binding on the Owners and their
successors and assigns until this Agreement is terminated as provided herein. This
Agreement and any rights granted to the Owners hereunder shall not be transferred or
assigned without the prior written consent of the City.
b. Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement, together with any exhibits hereto,
which are incorporated by reference, constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of
all mutual understandings between the parties with respect to this Agreement, superseding
all prior or contemporaneous proposals, communications, and understandings, whether
oral or written, concerning this Agreement. This Agreement may be modified or amended
only by court order or by a writing executed by all the parties hereto under the provisions
of this Agreement.
c. Notice. Any notice which is required under this Agreement will be deemed "given" upon
hand delivery or three (3) days after prepaid posting in the U. S. Mail whichever will first
occur. Notices shall be delivered or mailed to, or to such other address as a party may
designate by notice to the other party:
If to the Owners: Steven and Jennifer Bartz
130 Bergamot Drive
Medina, MN 55340
If to the City: City of Medina
5
2052 County Rd 24
Hamel, MN 55340
Attn: City Administrator
d. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall constitute one and the same instrument.
e. Recording; Release. The covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement shall
bind the Owners and their successors and assigns and shall run with the Property. It is the
intent of the parties to this Agreement that this Agreement be in a form which is recordable
among the property records of Hennepin County, Minnesota. The City intends to record
this Agreement with the County at the Owners’ expense. Upon termination of this
Agreement, the city administrator shall be authorized, upon a written request by the
Owners or their successors or assigns, to execute and deliver a document releasing the
Property from this Agreement and confirming that there are no outstanding obligations to
be performed hereunder.
f. Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Any disputes, controversies, or claims
arising out of this Agreement shall be heard in the state or federal courts of Minnesota,
and all parties to this Agreement waive any objection to the jurisdiction of these courts,
whether based on convenience or otherwise.
g. Waiver. A waiver by the City or the Owners of any breach of any term of this Agreement
shall not be deemed a waiver of any prior or subsequent breach of the same term or any
other term of this Agreement.
h. Headings. Any headings appearing at the beginning of the several sections contained in
this Agreement have been inserted for identification and reference purposes only and shall
not be used in the construction and interpretation of this Agreement.
i. Severability. If any part of this Agreement shall be held invalid, it shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Agreement, provided that such invalidity does not
materially prejudice either party under the remaining parts of this Agreement and this
Agreement shall be construed as if the unlawful or unenforceable provision or application
had never been contained herein or prescribed hereby.
j. Public Data. This Agreement and the information related to it are subject to the Minnesota
Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, which presumes that data
collected by the City is public data unless classified otherwise by law.
k. Relationship of Parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to create a
partnership, association or joint venture between the City and the Owners, or to create any
other relationship between the parties other than that of the City and the Owners.
l. Compliance with Laws. The Owners agree to abide by and conform to all laws, rules, and
regulations, including future amendments, controlling or affecting the use or occupancy
of the Property.
m. Attorney Fees. The Owners agree to pay the City's costs and expenses, including attorney
fees, in the drafting and review of this Agreement. The Owners further agrees to pay the
6
City’s costs and expenses, including attorney fees, in the event a suit or action is brought
by the City against the Owners to enforce the terms of this Agreement.
n. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are incorporated into the Agreement.
[signature pages to follow]
7
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement to be effective as of
the date first written above.
THE OWNERS:
___________________________________________ Date: ____________________
Steven Bartz
___________________________________________ Date: ____________________
Jennifer Bartz
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ____________, 2021,
by Steven Bartz and Jennifer Bartz, a married couple.
_____________________________________
Notary Public
8
THE CITY:
CITY OF MEDINA
By: ______________________________
Kathleen Martin
Its: Mayor
Date: ______________________________
By: ______________________________
Scott Johnson
Its: City Administrator
Date: ______________________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ____________, 2021,
by Kathleen Martin and Scott Johnson, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of the city of
Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the City.
_____________________________________
Notary Public
This document was drafted by:
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
700 Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9274
A-1
EXHIBIT A
The Property is situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota and legally described as follows:
That part of the South 555 feet of the North 1325 feet of the East half of the Southwest quarter
lying West of the East 825 feet thereof, and that part of the East half of the Southwest Quarter
lying West of the East 660 feet thereof and South of the North 1325 feet thereof;
Also the East 660 feet of the Southwest quarter lying South of the North 1325 feet thereof,
Section 7, Township 118, Range 23.
Subject to an easement for public highway over the East 40 feet of the Southwest Quarter and
over the South 30 feet of the West 10 feet of the East 50 feet of the Southeast Quarter and over
the North 25 feet of the South 1065.8 feet of the West 20 feet of the East 60 feet of the Southeast
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, all in Section 7, Township 118, Range 23, as shown by deed of
record in CR Book 2381 of Deeds, page 318, Doc. No. 3393534, as reformed by Order in Torrens
Case No. 15549
Torrens Property
Certificate No. 1522191
Resolution No. 2021-
October 19, 2021
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-
RECOGNIZING PUBLIC WORKS WATER OPERATOR GREG LEUER FOR
FIFTEEN YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITY OF MEDINA
WHEREAS, Greg Leuer has been a valued fulltime City of Medina employee in the
Public Works Department since October 1, 2006; and
WHEREAS, Greg has been serving as the Water Supply System Operator for fourteen
years, and conducts Fluoride, Chlorine, Iron, and Manganese Level Testing, and performs the
monitoring and reporting, and has fulfilled the requirements for certification with a Class C
License, and
WHEREAS, Greg has served as the Wastewater Collection System Operator for fourteen
years, and has fulfilled the requirements for certification with a Class SD License; and
WHEREAS, Greg has served on the Safety Committee for the City for the past thirteen
years as the safety liaison and training coordinator for the Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, Greg was instrumental in the startup of the Water Treatment Plant and
actively participated in the planning and completion of the upgrade of controls, the Independence
Beach Well House, and the startup of Well #7 and Well #8, and has been directly involved with
the Well #8 and Pumphouse #3 improvements; and
WHEREAS, Greg frequently interacts with the public and promotes great confidence in
his ability to deliver safe drinking water to the community, as well as responding to emergency
call-outs, and represents the City of Medina in a professional manner, and
WHEREAS, Greg is a dependable and dedicated team player who is versed in all aspects
of Public Works, is an all-around great employee, and always represents the City of Medina in a
professional manner, and
WHEREAS, the City of Medina expresses sincere gratitude for Greg’s dedication and
continued service to the Medina community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Medina
acknowledges and thanks Greg Leuer for fifteen years of service to the community.
Agenda Item #7A
Resolution No. 2021-
October 19, 2021
2
Dated: October 19, 2021.
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _______
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Agenda Item #7B
Background
• 2018
• Boat electrofishing surveys
• Population estimate 18,035 carp
• Biomass estimate 570 Ibs/acre
• 5 times too many carp
2019
Tagging carp to determine
movement between lakes
MCWD
48 Tags
Lang Lake i
,f
! /y
§-7 Tag's
igi
2021: Proof -of -concept test of a new removal strategy &
New biomass estimate using tagged carp
wlwr,` 1? Inlet .sound t�arr e ri
Nets are baited with corn.
Antennas on the bottom of the net track how many carp feed
on the bait and when
Nets are lifted using remote controllers to avoid spooking the carp
Daytime demo, actual removal usually at night
BAPS Minneapolis Page 1 of 6 October 19, 2021
Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: October 14, 2021
MEETING: October 19, 2021 City Council
SUBJ: BAPS Minneapolis LLC – 1400 Hamel Road – Site Plan Review
Background
At the October 5 meeting, the City Council reviewed a Site Plan Review for Bochasanwasi Shri
Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha (BAPS) Minneapolis for construction of an
approximately 46,000 square foot building at 1400 Hamel Road. The subject property is located
north of Hamel Road and east of Arrowhead Drive.
The Council tabled the request and asked for additional information on the following:
1) The Council requested additional landscaping along the west of the building to break up
the long building façade which was closest to adjoining property lines.
2) The Council requested additional details and renderings of the spire elements on the
southern portion of the building.
3) The Council requested additional detail on how the City’s height regulations apply to the
spire elements.
This additional information is discussed in this cover memo. The staff report from the October 5
meeting summarizing the remaining aspects of the application is attached for reference.
Landscaping Plan
The applicant has submitted an updated landscaping plan, providing an additional 13 trees to the
west of the building. The proposed trees include 10 conifers and three honey locusts. The
updated landscaping plan is included in the attached plan set.
The proposed landscaping exceeds the minimum required number by the Business Park (BP)
zoning district. If there are areas on the site plan which Council feels should include more
landscaping, it could require relocating plantings from other locations.
Details on Spires
The applicant has submitted renderings and photos of the architectural elements as requested by
Council, which are attached.
Height Regulation Analysis
Planning staff consulted with the City Attorney on existing regulations and how they may apply
to the proposed architectural design. As noted in the staff report and as is often the case, code
language does not explicitly address the specific architectural design being proposed as it relates
to the spire elements. As a result, the City Council will need to interpret the requirements based
upon the specific proposal.
Agenda Item #8A
BAPS Minneapolis Page 2 of 6 October 19, 2021
Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
The maximum building height within the Business Park (BP) zoning district is described in
Subd. 2 of Section 832.1.07: “Maximum Building Height: No building shall exceed 30 feet,
unless the building has a sprinkler system, in which case the height shall not exceed 35 feet.”
The proposed building will be sprinkled, resulting in a maximum building height of 35 feet.
Subd. 12 of Section 825.07 defines the term Building Height as: “The vertical distance
measured from the average grade around the building (points measured every 10 feet around the
building), to the top cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the
roof directly above the highest point of a shed roof, to the uppermost point on a round roof, and
to the mean elevation between the eave and peak for the highest pitched, hipped or gambrel roof.
If the average grade exceeds the building’s grade along the front of the lot by more than three
feet, the lowest grade shall be used.”
Staff cannot locate language in the code regulating or prohibiting architectural elements which
set above the roof. The “building height” definition is expressly related to the roof of the
structure. The zoning code does not define roof, but the dictionary and common usage is “the
cover of a building,” which does not correspond directly with the spires.
“Building” is defined in the zoning code as ““[a] structure having a roof supported by columns or
walls.”
Potential Interpretations
Consider the spires similar to “pitched roofs”
One potential interpretation is to consider the spire elements similar to a pitched roof. The
elements are not part of the roof structure, so would not meet this definition. The elements also
do not include an “eave” and trusses as would generally be expected within a pitched roof.
While the spire features do not appear to meet the explicit definition of a pitched roof, staff
believes this analysis is helpful contextually, because it reveals that it is possible for a building
meeting the 35-foot building height limitation to have a roof peak which extends as high above
grade as the proposed spires.
Consider the spires similar to “round roofs”
Another potential interpretation is to consider the spires as round roofs. Under this
interpretation, the building height definition would measure to the “uppermost point on a round
roof,” which would be 46 feet which would exceed the maximum 35 foot allowed.
Staff does not recommend this interpretation because generally, one would expect the inside
space of a round roof to be open into the structure. The architectural information provided by the
applicant indicates that this is not the case for the proposed elements.
Consider the elements as “roof signs”
Another interpretation is to consider the elements more akin to signage. A sign is defined as
“any letter, word, symbol, device, poster, picture, statuary, reading matter, or representation in
the nature of an advertisement, announcement, message, or visual communication, whether
BAPS Minneapolis Page 3 of 6 October 19, 2021
Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
painted, posted, printed, affixed, or constructed which is displayed outdoors for informational or
communicative purposes.” Signs erected upon the roof of a structure are not permitted by the
sign code.
Staff does not recommend this interpretation. Although staff believes it is reasonable to believe
that the proposed spires communicate (intentionally or not) what the use of the building will be,
staff believes architectural design and elements can have this effect in many building designs.
Staff has historically not considered architectural features as signage, required sign permits for
architectural elements, or applied the area of architectural elements to the allowed building
signage.
Additional Options
Staff believes it is reasonable to conclude that the spires are not a “roof” which for the purpose of
calculating building height regulations, but rather that the spires are architectural elements which
are not specifically addressed by current City regulations.
If the City Council agrees that the current regulations do not expressly address the issue, staff has
identified the following options:
Determine that the elements may not exceed maximum height
Since no language in the code explicitly permits architectural elements to exceed the maximum
building height, one potential interpretation is that no such elements may exceed the maximum
allowed building height.
Staff does not recommend this interpretation of the existing regulations because the City has
allowed features such as cupolas and screening elements for rooftop equipment to exceed
maximum height allowance.
It should be noted that the proposed spire features do exceed the roof height to which they are
attached by 30 feet, which is a significantly larger distance than other elements of which staff is
aware within recent decades. The features also have a larger area than is commonly seen. Most
cupolas are 4-8 feet in height, often with an additional weathervane 2-3 feet in height.
The bell tower at St. Anne’s Church and the steeple at Holy Name Church are more similar in
terms of area and the extent to which they exceed the roofs on which they are located. However,
these structures were constructed decades before the City’s current zoning ordinance was
enacted, and so although they were not analyzed under current standards, they do have similar
characteristics to the present application..
Direct staff to conduct a study and enact moratorium
Taken to extremes, concluding that architectural elements are not limited by existing code
standards may result in situations which are of significant concern. One might wonder if an
applicant proposed a 200-foot obelisk on top of a structure, would the City apply its regulations?
Staff believes that it is appropriate to study the City’s official controls to determine what changes
may be necessary in relation to the architectural elements. In the interim, the City would need to
determine how to address applications under review, including this subject application.
BAPS Minneapolis Page 4 of 6 October 19, 2021
Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
Pursuant to Subd. 4 of Minnesota Statute 462.355, the City is permitted to enact an interim
ordinance, commonly referred to as a moratorium, “if a municipality is conducting studies or has
authorized a study to be conducted or has held or has scheduled a hearing for the purpose of
considering adoption or amendment of a comprehensive plan or official controls.”
The statute provides that: “The interim ordinance may regulate, restrict, or prohibit any use,
development, or subdivision within the jurisdiction or a portion thereof for a period not to exceed
one year from the date it is effective.” The general purpose of a moratorium is to protect the
planning process and the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens.
If the City Council decides that an interim ordinance is necessary to protect the planning process
or the health, safety, or welfare of it citizens, it may choose to apply the moratorium to not only
future applications or but may elect to apply the moratorium to applications currently under
review as well.
Applying an interim ordinance to pending applications, not surprisingly, is usually met with
opposition by applicants because of the potential that the process will result in a change which
would affect their proposed design or construction. Nonetheless, it is legally permissible to
adopt and apply interim ordinances to pending applications, because it is not uncommon that an
application brings to light a situation which the City has not anticipated which necessitates study.
Approve the Site Plan Review under existing regulation; Direct staff to study
Even if the City Council determines that it is appropriate to study and consider changes to the
City’s regulations, the Council could approve the proposed site plan review because current
regulations do not prohibit architectural features from exceeding allowed building height.
The City often makes changes to its zoning regulations after experiencing the real world built-
form which results from implementing the code requirements. The City may adopt changes after
construction which renders a building legally non-conforming. This would prevent the issue for
future applications/buildings and prevent existing situations from expanding on the non-
conformity.
Staff Recommendation
Based upon existing code requirements, staff believes it is reasonable to approve the proposed
building design. The spires, while extending substantially above the roofline to which they are
attached, do not extend significantly higher from grade than the peak of a roofline that would be
permitted for a different architectural design.
Architectural features have recently been permitted on top of other buildings which are higher
above grade than the maximum permitted building height. In fact, cupolas on nearby structures
extend to approximately the same gross distance above the ground as the proposed spires. While
these recent examples have had a significantly smaller area and have not extended as far above
the roofline (because they are located on a taller, peaked roof), the existing code requirements do
not provide an explicit basis for determining which elements are too large. Staff has provided a
side-by-side exhibit on the next page to place the height and scale of the elements into context.
BAPS Minneapolis Page 5 of 6 October 19, 2021
Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
If the City Council does not believe approval of the site plan is appropriate based upon
application and interpretation of existing regulations, the City Attorney recommends that the
City Council consider enacting an interim ordinance related to the size and height of architectural
elements that extend above the maximum building height, rather than denying the applicant
under current regulations. The City Council would then determine if the interim ordinance is
necessary to do so to protect the planning process or health, safety, and welfare.
BAPS Minneapolis Page 6 of 6 October 19, 2021
Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
Staff has updated the list of recommended conditions below, to include reference to the updated
landscaping plan.
1.The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include
the conditions described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy.
2. The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated 9/29/2021 except as
may be modified herein. The design of all improvements shall be reviewed and approved by
the City Engineer prior to commencing construction.
3.The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the site improvements
in order to ensure completion.
4.The Applicant shall grant drainage and utility easements over all utilities, stormwater
improvements, wetlands, drainageways and locations recommended by the City Engineer.
5.The Applicant shall abide by the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance, including
installation of vegetative buffers, recordation of easements, and installation of signage. Plans
shall be updated to provide additional buffer area to provide for superior protection to
account for the reduced buffer width to the east of the building.
6.The Applicant shall submit specifications confirming that proposed concrete panels are color
impregnated in earth tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a high quality
terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine appearance.
7. Lighting shall comply with the City’s lighting ordinance, limiting light trespass to 0.2 FC
after light ordinance curfew and requiring all lighting to be downcast.
8.Wetland impacts shall be limited to those identified in the Wetland Conservation Act
Exemption approved on September 20, 2021.
9. A maximum of three flags may be permitted on the property and no more than 40 feet in
height.
10. Plans shall be updated to provide grading for future trail along Hamel Road.
11. Landscaping shall be installed based upon the plan dated 10/11/2021.
12. The Applicant shall identify transformer, generator, HVAC locations and provide screening
measures for review and approval.
13. The Applicant shall provide traffic control as requested by the City for larger events.
14.All comments from the Elm Creek Watershed District shall be addressed.
15. All comments from the City Engineer shall be addressed.
16.All comments from the Fire Chief shall be addressed.
17.The site plan review approval shall be effective for one year and thereafter shall be
considered null and void.
18.The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the
cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, site plan review, and related documents.
Potential Action
If the Council finds that, subject to the condition noted, the proposed construction meets relevant
standards, the following action would be appropriate:
Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution granting approval of the site plan review
subject to the conditions noted in the staff report.
Attachments
1.October 5, 2021 Staff Report
2.Narrative
3.Letter from applicant’s Attorney – Note: not reviewed prior to staff report
completion
4.Additional Architectural Details
5.Plans (including updated 10/11/2021 Landscaping Plan)
BAPS Minneapolis Page 1 of 8 October 5, 2021
Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: September 30, 2021
MEETING: October 5, 2021 Planning Commission
SUBJ: BAPS Minneapolis LLC – 1400 Hamel Drive – Site Plan Review
Summary of Request
Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha (BAPS) Minneapolis has
requested approval of a Site Plan Review for construction of an approximately 46,000 square
foot building at 1400 Hamel Road. The subject property is located north of Hamel Road and east
of Arrowhead Drive.
The subject site is approximately 20 acres in size, with approximately half containing wetlands.
The site is guided for Business development and zoned Business Park (BP). An existing home
and barn are located on the site and the upland areas of the site are pasture. An aerial of the
subject site and surround lands can be found below:
BAPS Minneapolis Page 2 of 8 October 5, 2021
Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
Property south of Hamel Road is zoned Rural Residential and have homes on rural lots. The
AutoMotorPlex facility and a storage building owned by Loram are located to the west. The
property north of the subject site is guided for Business development and currently farmed. A
large wetland is located east of the site, and property to the east is guided Mixed Residential and
owned by Wayzata Schools.
Proposed Use
Religious institutions are a permitted use within the BP zoning district. Staff has received
concerns related to the tax-exempt status of such uses. Federal law provides that cities may not
treat religious uses any less favorably than comparable non-religious uses irrespective of tax-
exempt status and it is not relevant for the sake of land use review.
Site Layout
The proposed construction appears to meet the dimensional standards of the BP zoning district.
Following is a summary comparing the proposed construction to standards of the district:
BP District
Requirement
Proposed
Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 feet
Minimum Rear/Side Yard Setback 30 feet 30 feet (west)
Setback from Residential 100 feet 410 feet (east)
1000 feet (south)
Minimum Parking Setbacks
Front Yard 35 feet 560 feet
Rear and Side Yard 20 feet 20 feet (north)
20 feet (west)
Residential (east) 100 feet 310 (east)
630 (south)
Maximum Hardcover 70% 19%
Building Height (sprinkled) 35 feet 35 feet
Building Height
The maximum building height within the BP zoning district is 35 feet. The proposed roof on the
higher portion of the building is 34 feet. There is a four-foot-tall architectural parapet above the
roof which also provides screening for roof top equipment.
The tallest aspect of the proposed building are the three spires in the southern portion of the
building. The tips of these spires are 50 feet above grade. The roof on which these spires are
located is only 20 feet high. The applicant proposes to calculate the height these spires similar to
a pitched roof, which is calculated at the midpoint between the peak and the eave. Based upon
this interpretation, the midpoint of the spires would be 35 feet (midpoint between 50-foot peak
and 20-foot roof).
For the sake comparison, a building with an eave at 20 feet above grade and a roof pitch of
5.5/12 could approach a peak height of 50 feet.
BAPS Minneapolis Page 3 of 8 October 5, 2021
Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
Building Materials and Design
The BP zoning district requires the following architectural standards. The Planning Commission
and Council can discuss whether the proposed building is consistent with the standards or
recommend conditions if necessary.
Materials
The BP district requires: “All exterior building materials shall be durable and meet the following
standards:
(a) A minimum of 20 percent of the building exterior shall be brick, natural stone, stucco
(not Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product), copper, or glass.
(b) A maximum of 80 percent may be decorative concrete, split face (rock face) decorative
block, and/or decorative pre-cast concrete panels. Decorative concrete shall be color
impregnated in earth tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a
high quality terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine appearance.
(c) A maximum of 20 percent may be wood, metal (excluding copper) or fiber cement lap
siding or Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product, if used as accent
materials which are integrated into the overall building design.”
The building is proposed to include the
exterior materials to the right:
Staff recommends a condition that the concrete is “color impregnated in earth tones (rather than
painted) and shall be patterned to create a high quality terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine
appearance.”
Modulation
The business districts require: “Buildings shall be designed to avoid long, monotonous building
walls. Modulation may include varying building height, building setback, or building
materials/design. Generally, a particular building elevation shall include a minimum of one
element of modulation per 100 feet of horizontal length, or portion thereof. Alternative
architectural or site elements and designs may also be approved by the city which achieve the
purpose of reducing the visual impact of long building walls.”
The north and south façades are approximately 160 feet in length, requiring 2 aspects of
modulation. The west and east façades are approximately 340 feet in length, requiring 4 aspects
of modulation. The proposed architectural plans appear to exceed these minimum requirements
with horizonal and vertical modulation, plus there is additional material differentiation across the
facades.
Fenestration and Transparency
The business districts require: “Building elevations which face a public street shall include
generous window coverage. Alternative architectural elements may be approved by the city when
windows are not practical.”
The southern façade of the structure includes approximately 16% window coverage and various
other architectural elements.
Materials Proposed Required
Glass, stone, brick, stucco 71% Minimum 20%
Concrete 22% Maximum 80%
Metal 7% Maximum 20%
BAPS Minneapolis Page 4 of 8 October 5, 2021
Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
Multi-sided Architecture
The business districts require: “Any rear or side building elevation which faces a public street or
a residential zoning district shall include design and architectural elements of a quality
generally associated with a front façade. The elevation(s) shall be compatible with the front
building elevation.”
The south and east facades face residential zoning districts, although the structure is more than
1000 feet from where any structures could be located. The eastern façade is designed as the
“front” elevation and the Planning Commission and City Council can discuss whether the
southern façade meets the expectation for multi-sided architecture.
Stormwater/Grading
The applicant proposes three filtration basins for stormwater management. The City Engineer
has reviewed and provided comments to address. The project will also be subject to Elm Creek
Watershed review and approval.
The site slopes generally from the northwest to the wetland to the east. The applicant proposes
to flatten the area of the building and parking and add a retaining wall along the east side of the
driveway. However, the drainage patterns of the site mimic existing by having three filtration
basins along the east of the site.
Wetlands and Floodplains
A large wetland occupies the east of the property, and a smaller wetland is in the southwest of
the site, with a narrow strip of land between the two wetlands. The applicant proposes 846
square feet of impacts to the wetlands to allow access between the two wetlands to the north of
the site. The impacts meet the de minimis exemption within the Wetland Conservation Act.
The wetland requires buffers with a minimum
average width to the right. The wetland protection
ordinance allows reductions in buffer width to 75%
of the minimum width if an applicant implements
practices which are superior to strict adherence. The applicant proposes an approximately 100
foot long portion of the buffer to the east of the building at 15’ in width (75% of the minimum).
The applicant proposes to exceed the total area of required buffer throughout the site to provide
the superior protection as required. Staff recommends that a minimum of 2x area of larger buffer
is provided for the reduced area (approximately an additional 500 square feet).
FEMA floodplain maps identify a large “Zone A” floodplain within the large wetland basin to
the east. No impacts are proposed near the floodplain area, and all improvements are proposed
more than 10 feet above the elevation of the wetland.
Transportation
Peak traffic is projected on Sunday mornings for services. Traffic for remaining days will be
fairly limited. The application was routed to Hennepin County Transportation for review since
Hamel Road is a County Road. Hennepin County and the City’s Transportation Engineer have
reviewed and determined that projected traffic would not necessitate improvements or turn lanes
Wetland Mange.
Class.
Average
Buffer
Minimum
Buffer
East Manage 1 30 feet 20 feet
West Mange 2 25 feet 20 feet
BAPS Minneapolis Page 5 of 8 October 5, 2021
Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
on Hamel Road. Hamel Road is comparatively low volume roadway and the peak traffic and
turns generated by the use occur off peak.
Staff recommends a condition that the applicant provide traffic control if requested by the City
for larger events.
The access to Hamel Road is proposed across from the shared driveway of 1405/1495 Hamel
Road.
The applicant proposes a sidewalk connection from Hamel Road to the building. The City has
identified a future trail along Hamel Road and the City Council approved of the route for the
Diamond Lake Regional Trail in this location as well. The applicant has indicated that they
would amend their grading plan to make future construction of the trail as easy as possible. Staff
has inquired if the applicant would be willing to provide trail easements and potential construct a
portion of the trail in connection with construction on the site. The applicant may address this
construction at the Planning Commission meeting.
Parking
The applicant proposes 227 parking spaces. For religious institutions and other places of
assembly, the City’s parking ordinance requires 1 space per 4 seats. This would be equivalent to
908 seats. The main assembly place has less seating than this, but if all spaces such as
classrooms and dining are calculated, seating capacity would exceed 900. The applicant has
indicated that these other spaces are ancillary, and most will not be used to their maximum
concurrently. Historically, the peak attendance has been 250 persons, which only occurs a few
times per year.
There is additional area in the southern portion of the site for additional parking if necessary.
Staff believes it is reasonable to not require excessive parking to be constructed. Staff
recommends a condition that states no improvements can be constructed in this area unless the
City determines that existing parking is sufficient.
Lighting
The City’s lighting ordinance requires light trespass to be no more than 0.2 FC at property lines
post curfew. The initial lighting plans exceeded these amounts in some locations, but the
applicant has submitted updated plans to meet the requirements.
Tree Preservation
No wooded areas are located on the property, although there are historically planted tree lines in
the vicinity of the house, and volunteer trees (predominantly box elder) in the area of the barn.
Trees in the remaining site are sparse. The total number of significant trees is approximately
100.
The applicant proposes to remove 8 trees for construction of access and the parking lot. The
applicant also proposes to remove 21 trees adjacent to the house and barn to allow demolition of
the existing structures.
BAPS Minneapolis Page 6 of 8 October 5, 2021
Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
The tree preservation ordinance would permit 10% of the trees on the site to be removed without
replacement for initial site development and 10% in connection with “other activities” on the site
beyond initial development.
If full replacement were to be required, approximately 80 inches of replacement trees would be
required. The tree preservation ordinance exempts the removal of “pioneering Tree species such
as box elder when needed to manage other ecosystems and where removal will not cause erosion
or damage to riparian areas.” Staff believes it is reasonable to not require the replacement in this
case.
Landscaping
The business district includes the following landscape requirements:
• Building Setting - At least 12 feet of landscaped area shall be provided adjacent to all
buildings except for walks, plaza space and approved loading docks. Walks within this
landscaped area shall be limited to where practically necessary to serve access points of
buildings
Landscaping appears to be 12 feet or greater in width, except in the area east of the building in
the loading/unloading area. Staff believes it is reasonable to have reduced landscape area in this
location as “access points/plaza.”
• Minimum Planting
Requirement Required Proposed
Overstory trees 1 per 50’ site perimeter 82 trees 94 trees
Ornamental trees 1 per 100’ site perimeter 41 trees 41 trees
Shrubs 1 per 30’ site perimeter 137 shrubs 276 shrubs
Staff recommends that additional landscaping be provided west of the proposed building.
• Parking lot landscaping – minimum of 8% of parking lot area
The interior of the parking lot includes approximately 8% landscaping area.
• Landscaping islands every 20 spaces, wider separations for cells of 120 spaces
Plans appear to provide required landscaping islands and separation.
• Buffering. Landscaping is required to have an opacity of 50% adjacent to residential
zoning districts. According to the City’s bufferyard requirements, this would require
approximately 2400 “planting points” to the south and east of the structure. South of the
structure meets this requirement. An additional 400 points are required to the east.
Utilities, Mechanical Equipment, and Trash and Recycling Facilities
The business districts require: All utilities shall be placed underground. To the extent possible,
all utility equipment, meters and transformers shall be placed either inside of the building or
within an outside mechanical court formed by walls. If not located within the building, these
items shall be fully screened from view from adjacent property and streets through the
use of opaque landscaping or walls constructed of materials which are compatible with
the building.
BAPS Minneapolis Page 7 of 8 October 5, 2021
Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
The plans do not identify transformers, generators, or HVAC location. Staff recommends a
condition that these locations be identified and screening measures provided.
All trash and material to be recycled are required to be stored within the principal building,
within an accessory structure, or within an enclosed outdoor area adjacent to the principal
structure. The applicant proposes an accessory structure in the southwestern corner of the
northern parking lot for this purpose.
Review Criteria
The City has a relatively low level of discretion when reviewing the Site Plan Review. The
purpose of a Site Plan Review is to review compliance with relevant land use regulations. If the
proposed construction meets the requirements, it should be approved. The City can apply
conditions as necessary to ensure compliance with City requirements and to protect the public
health, safety and welfare.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission reviewed the application at the September 14 meeting. An excerpt
from the meeting minutes is attached for reference.
Three property owners spoke during the review. The developer of the AutoMotorPlex to the west
requested that the applicant consider various changes to reduce potential impacts to their
development site, including: adjusting building location, fencing, additional landscaping and
reducing the height of the spires. The applicant indicated that they would update landscaping
plan and that there would be fencing adjacent to the playground, but that they would prefer not to
put a fence along the entire property line. The applicant also indicated that they had reviewed
multiple locations to locate the building and that this location provided the largest area to
accommodate the building and parking.
Staff has identified several changes necessary to meet City requirements but believes it should be
relatively straight-forward for the applicant to do so. The Planning Commission recommended
approval of the Site Plan Review subject to the following conditions:
1. The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall
include the conditions described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance
or policy.
2. The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated _____________,
except as may be modified herein. The design of all improvements shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing construction.
3. The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the site
improvements in order to ensure completion.
4. The Applicant shall grant drainage and utility easements over all utilities, stormwater
improvements, wetlands, drainageways and other locations recommended by the City
Engineer.
5. The Applicant shall abide by the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance,
including installation of vegetative buffers, recordation of easements, and installation of
signage. Plans shall be updated to provide additional buffer area to provide for superior
protection to account for the reduced buffer width to the east of the building.
BAPS Minneapolis Page 8 of 8 October 5, 2021
Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
6. The Applicant shall submit specifications confirming that proposed concrete panels are
color impregnated in earth tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a
high quality terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine appearance.
7. Lighting shall comply with the City’s lighting ordinance, limiting light trespass to 0.2 FC
after light ordinance curfew and requiring all lighting to be downcast.
8. Wetland impacts shall be limited to those identified in the Wetland Conservation Act
Exemption approved on September 20, 2021.
9. Plans shall be updated to provide grading for future trail along Hamel Road.
10. The Applicant shall update landscaping plan to provide additional 400 planting points of
landscaping to provide 0.5 opacity east of the structure.
11. The Applicant shall identify transformer, generator, HVAC locations and provide
screening measures for review and approval.
12. The Applicant shall provide traffic control as requested by the City for larger events.
13. All comments from the Elm Creek Watershed District shall be addressed.
14. All comments from the City Engineer shall be addressed.
15. All comments from the Fire Chief shall be addressed.
16. The site plan review approval shall be effective for one year and thereafter shall be
considered null and void.
17. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for
the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, site plan review, and related documents.
Potential Action
If the Council finds that, subject to the condition noted, the proposed construction meets relevant
standards, the following action would be appropriate:
Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution granting approval of the site plan review
subject to the conditions noted in the staff report.
Attachments
1. List of Documents
2. Excerpt from draft 9/14/2021 Planning Commission minutes
3. Engineering comments dated 8/26/2021
4. Comment received
5. Narrative
6. Plans
Project Narrative for Site Plan Review Request for
BAPS Hindu Temple
Location: 1400 Hamel Road
Medina, MN 55340
Applicant: BAPS Minneapolis LLC
General Description of Request:
The BAPS Temple is a premier new construction opportunity seeking to relocate this
community center to Medina. Through the attached application, BAPS is requesting site plan
approval for construction of one building of worship that would include a temple (mandir),
dining hall, gymnasium, and one permanent residency space for the temple’s priest. The 2-story
facility, of approximately 46,000 total square feet, will support the above uses and provide a
great addition to the community. The property is zoned Business Park (BP) and the temple is a
permitted use as confirmed during the project introduction meeting with City Planning staff on
07-13-2021.
The project will consist of demolishing the existing farmhouse and barn structures,
construction of the new temple building, two supporting parking lots, stormwater basins, and
related utility service connections. The proposed building incorporates high quality design and
a mix of Class-I Architectural materials including a large span of glass façade overlooking the
wetland on the front/east side of the building.
The two wetlands onsite have approved delineations from 12-22-2020 and total
approximately 7.6-acres of the 19.6-acre parcel. The larger east wetland is proposed to be
protected in its entirety with the site layout purposefully designed to adhere to the 10-foot
minimum buffer and 25-foot average buffer design standards for protection of the wetland.
There is a pinch point between the two wetlands that we’re seeking a very minor impact to the
smaller west wetland which is necessary to access the development. The impact proposed is
less than 1,000 square feet thereby qualifying under the “de minimis” limit of not requiring any
wetland mitigation.
Attached please find the supporting documentation including the preliminary site plan package
with architectural floor plans and elevations.
Company: The BAPS Swaminarayan Sanstha is a spiritual, volunteer-driven organization dedicated to
improving society through individual growth by fostering the ideals of faith, unity, and selfless
service.
BAPS Hindu Temple Project Narrative
Revised August 20, 2021
Page 2
Locally, we have been serving the community in the twin cities since 2003 through various
activities that include Annual Walkathons, Blood donation drives, health fairs and lectures,
adopt a street cleaning, etc.
Hours of Operation: Mon-Sat.: 7 am to noon, 4 pm to 8 pm, Sun.: 7 am to 8 pm
Landscaping & Screening: Landscape screening between the proposed parking lot and adjacent businesses will
meet City minimum requirements. A variety of coniferous, deciduous, and ornamental trees will
be provided throughout the site. Trees will be a hardy mix of native species and will be
provided within interior parking islands to minimize the heat island effect. Shrubs and trees
will wrap parking areas and create an aesthetically pleasing presentation.
Signage: One monument sign is proposed at the entrance off Hamel Road to guide visitors to the temple.
Lighting: Lighting will be LED on poles with concrete bases. Lighting will be in conformance with City
Code. All lighting will be shielded as necessary to avoid any overlap to adjacent properties and
programmable to reduce lighting during non-business hours.
Traffic Impacts: There will be minor impacts to traffic flow on Hamel Road from this development. 250 total
parking spaces are proposed (combined total from both parking lots). For times of peak usage,
Sundays, Currently, BAPS experiences 200-250 visitors typically at their Brooklyn Center
location. Otherwise from a traffic perspective, counts are very low throughout the week, and we
only expect 2-3 festivals per year that would have attendance comparable to Sunday peaks.
The team met and reviewed the site plan with Hennepin County on 7-22-2021 and county staff
agreed the project scale and scope did not warrant a traffic study or addition of a turn lane to
Hamel Road at this time. A single access is currently proposed and is located directly across the
existing driveway on the opposite side of Hamel as desired by the County.
We respectfully request City support for the enclosed application by BAPS Minneapolis LLC for Site Plan Review
for the 1400 Hamel Road parcel depicted on the attached site plans. We look forward to reviewing this
application with the City in the weeks ahead.
Sincerely,
Asit Waghani
BAPS Minneapolis LLC
Pete Moreau
Sambatek, Inc.
Enclosures:
• Attachment A – Project Data (proposed floor plan uses and estimated water & sanitary sewer usage)
• Site Plans, Floor Plans, & Colored Elevations
• Stormwater Management Report
PROPOSED FLOOR AREA :
GROUND FLOOR : 13890 SQ.FT.
SECOND FLOOR : 32200 SQ.FT.
TOTAL FLOOR AREA : 46090 SQ.FT.
PRAYER HALL : 8000 SQ.FT.
PREIST RESIDENCE : 4440 SQ.FT.
ASSEMBLY HALL : 7820 SQ.FT.
GYM/ DININIG HALL : 4580 SQ.FT.
KITCHEN : 3000 SQ.FT.
CLASSROOMS : 9450 SQ.FT.
LOBBY SERVICES & 8800 SQ.FT
CIRCULATION :
TOTAL : 46090 SQ.FT.
FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS
PROPOSED OCCUPANTS
SEATING : 480
STAFF AND VOLUNTERS : 20
TOTAL OCCUPANTS : 500
SECTION 828.151 OFF STREET PARKING
STANDARDS :
PARKING REQUIRED : 500 seats/4 125
PARKING PROVIDED : 250
PARKING CALCULATIONS
PROJECT DATA :
WATER : 75 GPM
WASTE WATER : 10,720 GPD
ESTIMATED WATER AND SEWER
USAGE :
4 5
ATTACHMENT A - PROJECT DATA
PROPOSED FLOOR AREA :
GROUND FLOOR : 43780 SQ.FT
SECOND FLOOR : 2200 SQ.FT.
TOTAL FLOOR AREA : 45980 SQ.FT.
PRAYER HALL : 6600 SQ.FT.
PREIST RESIDENCE : 4440 SQ.FT.
ASSEMBLY HALL : 8560 SQ.FT.
GYM/ DININIG HALL : 5042 SQ.FT.
KITCHEN : 1200 SQ.FT.
CLASSROOMS : 8580 SQ.FT.
LOBBY SERVICES & 11558 SQ.FT
CIRCULATION :
TOTAL : 45980 SQ.FT.
FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS
PROPOSED OCCUPANTS
SEATING : 480
STAFF AND VOLUNTERS : 20
TOTAL OCCUPANTS : 500
SECTION 828.151 OFF STREET PARKING
STANDARDS :
PARKING REQUIRED : 500 seats/4 125
PARKING PROVIDED : 250
PARKING CALCULATIONS
PROJECT DATA :
WATER : 75 GPM
WASTE WATER : 10,720 GPD
ESTIMATED WATER AND SEWER
USAGE :
J K
STRUCTURAL FRAMING
PER STR. DWGS.
PRIMARY SUPPORT
STRUCTURAL FRAMING
FOR SPIRES AS PER STR.DWGS.
FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY
OVER MTL JOISTS FRAMING
MECHANICALLY FASTENED
ACCESS PANELS FOR
SERVICE
GALV ALUM METAL
PANELS , PAINTED KYNAR
FINISH
GLASS FIBER REINFORCED
CONCRETE (GFRC)
PRECAST CAP
STRUCTURAL FRAMING
PER STR. DWGS.
PRIMARY SUPPORT
STRUCTURAL FRAMING
FOR SPIRES AS PER STR.DWGS.
FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY
OVER MTL JOISTS FRAMING
MECHANICALLY FASTENED
ACCESS PANELS FOR
SERVICE
GALV ALUM METAL
PANELS , PAINTED KYNAR
FINISH
GLASS FIBER REINFORCED
CONCRETE (GFRC)
PRECAST CAP
J K
1
A-401
PRE FAB GAL. ALUM
PANELS OVER
STRUCTURAL
FRAMING
GFRC CAP
ROOF SURFACE
BELOW
2
A-401
PRE FAB GAL. ALUM
PANELS OVER
STRUCTURAL
FRAMING
GFRC CAP
ROOF SURFACE
BELOW
SCALE
DATE
DRAWN
PROJECT NO
BH
A
R
A
T
R
P
A
T
E
L
,
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
,
I
N
C
.
50
5
7
N
O
R
T
H
E
R
N
L
I
G
H
T
S
D
R
,
G
R
E
E
N
A
C
R
E
S
,
F
L
-
3
3
4
6
3
(P
)
:
5
6
1
-
4
2
4
-
9
5
4
0
(
F
)
:
5
6
1
-
3
2
7
-
2
3
7
6
ww
w
.
b
r
p
a
r
c
h
.
c
o
m
FL
O
R
I
D
A
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
E
D
F
I
R
M
,
L
I
C
.
N
O
A
A
2
6
0
0
1
9
2
3
BRP
AS-SHOWN
10
/
1
3
/
2
0
2
1
2
:
0
2
:
4
8
P
M
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
P
L
A
C
E
O
F
W
O
R
S
H
I
P
14
0
0
H
A
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
(
K
E
S
2
0
2
0
-15
5
)
ME
D
I
N
A
,
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
SE
C
T
I
O
N
S
A-401
07.31.2021
BA
P
S
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
DE
S
I
G
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
2021-13
Revisions
Rev# Rev Date Description
3/16" = 1'-0"1 TYPICAL SECTION THRU SPIRE
3/16" = 1'-0"2 TYPICAL SECTON THRU DOME
3/16" = 1'-0"3 TYPICAL SPIRE PLAN
3/16" = 1'-0"4 TYPICAL DOME PLAN
James E. Snoxell
Steven M. Graffunder*
Jeffrey A. Berg
Mark V. Steffenson
Craig T. Dokken
Susan T. Peterson-Lerdahl
Chad E. Henderson
L. David Henningson, Founder-Retired
*MSBA Board Certified
Real Property Law Specialist
6900 Wedgwood Road, Suite 200
Maple Grove, MN 55311-3541
Tel: (763) 560-5700 Fax: (763) 560-0119
Debra S. Nelson
Tifanne E. E. Wolter
Adam J. Kaufman
Kelly M. Eull
Virginia R. Cronin
Rachell L. Henning
www.hennsnoxlaw.com
October 14, 2021
VIA EMAIL ONLY TO: dusty.finke@medinamn.gov
Mayor and City Council
City of Medina
Medina City Hall
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340
Re: BAPS Request for Approval of Hindu Temple
Our File No. 32316-004
Dear Mayor and City Council Members:
Our office represents BAPS in connection with its application for approval of a Hindu temple
(also referred as a mandir) on the property located at 1400 Hamel Road. We are writing to
address certain questions and issues that arose at the City Council Meeting on October 5, 2021,
and to provide some additional information for the record of the application.
In particular, some questions arose about the three spires shown on the site plan. One such
question was what the spires would look like when finished. To provide a better understanding
in that regard, Pages 1-6 of the enclosed Appendix have 3-D renderings and an aerial view.
These renderings depict the spires as they would be constructed.
Another question arose regarding whether spires of their respective heights complied with the
City’s zoning code. The remainder of this letter will be devoted to addressing that issue. As will
be demonstrated, the spires comply with the City’s zoning code, and the application should be
approved.
Background
The BAPS proposal calls for three spires. Two of the spires are approximately 44 feet above
grade and one spire is approximately 50 feet above grade. The drawing reviewed at the City
Council Meeting may have given the mistaken impression that all three spires were 50 feet above
grade. That is not the case, and the 3-D renderings better depict the height difference between
the spires.
October 14, 2021
Page 2
As was explained at the October 5 City Council Meeting, the spires (including the flags at the
top) have specific religious meaning and significance to BAPS. The spires are part of their
religious beliefs and practices, and are central tenets of BAPS. The spires are not simply
decorative items that are someone’s idea of an interesting design element.
The importance of the spires is evidenced by the photos shown at Appendix Pages 7-8. For
example, temples constructed by BAPS in Chicago and Detroit both show spires similar to those
proposed by BAPS for the Medina site. The zoning codes for the locations of those two temples
are shown at Appendix Pages 9-10. It is only where BAPS purchased existing buildings in a
couple of other communities that external spires similar to those being proposed in Medina are
not part of the temples in those locations. These couple of exceptions to BAPS norms do not
diminish the importance of spires to BAPS religious beliefs and practices, or raise a question as
to the sincerity of its religious beliefs regarding the necessity of spires.
We also note that the elevation of the BAPS site is approximately 1000 feet, while the elevation
of adjoining AutoMotorPlex is approximately 1005 feet, or 5 feet higher than the BAPS site.
That means that the tallest spire, at 50 feet, is no taller than the highest peak on a building at the
AutoMotorPlex site.
Neighboring Communities Exclude Church Spires from Building Height Calculations
It is useful to review the zoning codes of some of the communities surrounding Medina to see
how neighboring cities treat church spires. Of particular relevance is the zoning code of the City
of Maple Grove. While it is not a BAPS temple, there is a Hindu temple located in Maple
Grove. The temple is located in the R-A zoning district. Like Medina’s Business Park zoning
district, Maple Grove’s R-A zoning district has a maximum height of 35 feet. Nevertheless,
Maple Grove approved a temple with a 45-foot gopuram (grand entrance), in part because Maple
Grove’s zoning code specifically excludes church spires from the calculation of building height.
See Appendix Pages 11-12.
Likewise, the zoning codes of Plymouth, Corcoran, and Wayzata all exclude church spires from
the calculation of building height. See Appendix Pages 13-15. Although some of the zoning
codes place limitations on the height of church spires above a designated building height or
require conditional use permits if a certain height is exceeded, they nevertheless start from the
point of excluding church spires from the calculation of building height. Excluding the spires
from the calculation of the building height of the BAPS temple is consistent with the precedent
set in other neighboring communities that have expressly addressed that issue in their zoning
codes.
Spires on Other Churches in Medina Exceed 50 feet
We note that two Christian churches within the City of Medina have spires that exceed 50 feet.
Holy Name of Jesus has a spire that is approximately 73 feet in height, and the Church of St.
Anne has a spire that is approximately 77 feet in height. See Appendix Page 16. While it was
stated at the October 5 City Council Meeting that those spires were approved in earlier times, it
October 14, 2021
Page 3
doesn’t change the fact that there are two Christian churches in the City of Medina that have
spires that are much taller than those proposed by BAPS.
Staff and Planning Commission Recommendations
The Memorandum of City Staff to the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
temple as proposed by BAPS. The height of the spires was discussed at the Planning
Commission, and the Planning Commission unanimously approved the proposed temple. Part of
the discussion centered on an analogy of the spires to a pitched roof, which would be permitted
to be 50 feet in height at the peak because the height of a pitched roof is calculated at the mean
distance between the eaves and the peak of a pitched roof. The Staff and Planning Commission
recommendations should be given considerable weight by the City Council.
Additional Landscaping
There was discussion at both the Planning Commission Meeting and the City Council Meeting
about adding more landscaping. Following the Planning Commission, BAPS added 10 more
trees to its landscaping plan to address the comments made by the Planning Commission. After
the City Council Meeting, BAPS added 13 more trees to its landscaping plan in response to the
Council’s comments. The landscaping plan exceeds code requirements for the site.
Hindu Heritage Month
Finally, we note that Governor Walz has issued a Proclamation declaring October to be Hindu
Heritage Month in the State of Minnesota. See Appendix, Page 17. The value of BAPS
community is also shown in the letter from the City of Brooklyn Center, where BAPS has been
located since 2003. See Appendix Page 18. There certainly would be no better time than now
for the City of Medina to join with Governor Walz in recognizing Minnesota’s Hindu
community by approving the BAPS request to build a temple in the City of Medina.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
HENNINGSON & SNOXELL, LTD.
Steven M. Graffunder
Steven M. Graffunder
SMG:sak
Encs. (Appendix)
APPENDIX
1. 3D Rendering View 1
2. 3D Rendering View 2
3. 3D Rendering View 3
4. 3D Rendering View 4
5. 3D Rendering View 5
6. Aerial Rendering
7. Detroit BAPS Temple
8. Chicago BAPS Temple
9. Detroit Zoning Code
10. Chicago Zoning Code
11. Maple Grove Temple
12. City of Maple Grove Zoning Code
13. City of Plymouth Zoning Code
14. City of Corcoran Zoning Code
15. City of Wayzata Zoning Code
16. City of Medina – other places of worship
17. Proclamation by Governor Walz
18. Endorsement from City of Brooklyn Center
1
3D Rendering View 1
2
3D Rendering View 2
3
3D Rendering View 3
4
3D Rendering View 4
5
3D Rendering View 5
6
Aerial Rendering
7
8
Other BAPS mandirs - Chicago
Height: 56 ft
9
BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir
Canton, MI
Zoning Classification for this Temple: R-3 Single Family Residential
Maximum Building Height: 25 ft
Building Height Provisions:
Definition: “The vertical distance measured from the established grade to:
- The highest point of the coping of a flat roof;
- To the deck line of mansard roofs; or
- To the average height between the eaves and the ridge for gable, hip, and gambrel roofs
Where a building is located on sloping terrain, the height shall be measured from the average ground level
at the building wall.”
Not included in definition of Building: A building shall not include such structures as signs, or fences, or
structures not normally accessible for human occupation, such as tanks, smokestacks, grain elevators, coal
bunkers, oil cracking towers, or similar structures.
Exceptions to height standards. The height limitation of this ordinance shall not apply to chimneys,
church spires, clocks or bell towers or other similar architectural design elements, public monuments, or
wireless transmission towers, provided that such structures do not exceed 20 feet above the maximum
height in the district in which they are located.
Additionally, architectural features which include building and roofline elements which are
intended to add architectural interest and not for the purpose of adding signage to the building may be
allowed to exceed the maximum height of the district by not more than 20 feet. The building area
encompassed by the proposed building and/or roofline element shall not exceed 25% of the footprint of the
total structure.
Official Code of Zoning Ordinance: Mini TOC: APPENDIX A - ZONING | Code of Ordinances | Canton
Charter Township, (Wayne Co.), MI | Municode Library
Official Zoning Map: Zoning-Map-PDF (canton-mi.org)
10
BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir
Bartlett, IL
Zoning Classification for this Temple: ER-1 PUD (Estate Residence; 80,000 sq ft and above)
Maximum Building Height: 30 ft 4 in (See page 285 of code)
Building Height Provisions:
Definition: The vertical distance measured from the finished grade to the average overall height of the
roof surface. (See pg 256 of code).
Building Appurtenances. “…., ornamental towers and spires may be erected above the height limits
herein prescribed and shall not be included in calculation of building height. Such items erected
more than 10’ in excess of the height limits of the zoning district in which they are located or the height
of the structure to which they are attached, shall be required to be reviewed and approved by the village
board prior to being erected.” (See pg 269 of code)
Official Code of Zoning Ordinance: bartlettil-il-1.pdf
Official Zoning Map: showdocument (bartlettil.gov)
11
12
Hindu Temple of Minnesota
10530 Troy Ln N
Maple Grove, MN 55311
Zoning Classification for this Temple: R-A (Residential Agricultural)
Building Height: 45 foot gopuram (grand entrance): Hindu Temple of Minnesota - www.leoadaly.com
Building Height Provisions:
Definition: the distance to be measured from the mean ground level to the top of a flat roof, to the mean
distance of the highest gable of a pitched or hip roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, or to the
uppermost point on all other roof types.
Section 36-8 Exceptions: The building height limits established in this chapter for districts shall not
apply to the following: http://maplegrove-mn.elaws.us/code/coor_ch36_arti_sec36-8
o Belfries
o Chimneys or flues
o Church spires
o Etc.
36-236 Building Requirements. Except for farm buildings, no structure in the R-A district shall exceed
three stories or 35 feet in building height, whichever is greater. http://maplegrove-
mn.elaws.us/code/coor_ch36_artiv_div2_sec36-236
Official Code of Zoning Ordinance: 1997_Zoning_Ordinance.pdf (maplegrovetownship.org)
Official Zoning Map: Logis File Management System - 2019 Zoning Map.pdf
13
City of Plymouth, MN
Building Height Provisions:
Definition: Principal Building: The vertical distance from the average of the highest and lowest point
of grade for that portion of the lot covered by the building to the highest point of the roof for flat
roofs, to the roof deck line of mansard roofs, and to the mean height between eaves and ridge for
gable, hip, and gambrel roofs.
Exceptions: the building height limits established in each zoning district shall not apply to the
following list of items, except that no such structural element may exceed 50 feet in total height or
exceed the maximum allowable height of the building by more than ten feet, whichever is greater,
except by conditional use permit.
o Belfries
o Chimneys or flues
o Church spires
o Etc.
Modifications to the topography of a lot may not be undertaken as a means of achieving increased
building height, unless approved by the Zoning Administrator.
In the case of any proposal to construct or alter a structure which will exceed a height of 200 feet above
ground level of the site, or any proposal to construct or alter a structure to a height of greater than an
imaginary surface extending upward and outward at a slope of 100:1 from the nearest point of the
nearest runway of a public airport, the applicant shall notify the Commissioner of the Minnesota
Department of Transportation in writing of the plans at least 30 days in advance of making applicable
permit requests to the City. The applicant shall provide the Zoning Administrator with any comments
received from the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation as part of the required
applicable permit request. This local reporting is in addition to any federal permitting and review
processing which may be simultaneously required.
Official Code of Zoning Ordinance: plymouthmn.gov/departments/community-
development/planning/zoning-ordinance
Official Zoning Map of Plymouth: Plymouth Minnesota Zoning Map
14
City of Corcoran, MN
Building Height Provisions:
Definition: The vertical distance to be measured from the grade of a building line to the top of the
cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest
wall of a shed roof, to the upper most point on a round or other arch type roof, to the mean distance of
the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. [pg 298].
Section 1030.080 Height Limitations: The Building height limits established herein for districts shall
not apply to the following: [pg. 335]
o Belfries
o Chimneys or flues
o Church spires
o Etc.
Official Code of Zoning Ordinance: TITLE I (civiclive.com)
15
City of Wayzata, MN
Building Height Provisions:
Definition: The vertical distance above a Grade Plane measured to the highest point of the coping of a
flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to the uppermost point on a shed, round or arch type roof,
or to the average height of the highest gable of a pitched, hipped or gambrel roof. Modifications to the
site grading that would affect the grade plane of a lot shall not be undertaken as a means of achieving
increased building height, unless approved by the City Council. The height of a stepped or terrace
building is the maximum height of any segment of the building. [Chapter 902.02].
Exception: The building height limits established in each zoning district shall not apply to the following
list of items, except that no such structural element may exceed 40 feet in total height or exceed the
maximum height of the building by more than 5 feet, whichever is greater, except by conditional use
permit: [Chapter 919.02 (B); Height Requirements\]
o Belfries
o Chimneys or flues
o Church spires
o Etc.
Official Code of Zoning Ordinance: CHAPTER 919 - GENERAL YARD, LOT AREA AND BUILDING
REGULATIONS | Code of Ordinances | Wayzata, MN | Municode Library
16
17
18
Sep 28, 2021 - 5:07pm - User:mlarson L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-C1-TITLE.dwg
C1.01
TITLE SHEET
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,
Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/202153735
Pete S. Moreau
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
DEVELOPER/OWNER
BAPS MINNEAPOLIS LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
TEL 952-457-9500
MC.MINNEAPOLIS@USA.BAPS.ORG
CONTACT: ASIT WAGHANI
ARCHITECT
BHARAT PATEL ARCHITECT, INC
5057 NORTHERN LIGHTS DR
GREENACRES FL, 33463
561-306-6573
BPATEL@BRPARCH.COM
CONTACT: BHARAT PATEL
CIVIL ENGINEER
SAMBATEK
12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300
MINNETONKA, MN 55343
TEL 763-476-6010
PMOREAU@SAMBATEK.COM
CONTACT: PETE MOREAU
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
SAMBATEK
12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300
MINNETONKA, MN 55343
TEL 763-476-6010
JWORKMAN@SAMBATEK.COM
CONTACT: JOHNNIE WORKMAN
SURVEYOR
SAMBATEK
12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300
MINNETONKA, MN 55343
TEL 763-476-6010
EWITHROW@SAMBATEK.COM
CONTACT: ERIC WITHROW
SHEET INDEX
SHEET DESCRIPTION
C1.01 TITLE SHEET
1 OF 1 ALTA-NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
C2.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS
C2.02 EXISTING CONDITIONS (350' OVERLAP)
C2.03 DEMOLITION PLAN
C3.01 SITE PLAN
C4.01 GRADING PLAN
C4.02 GRADING NOTES
C5.01 PHASE I EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C5.02 PHASE II EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C5.03 EROSION CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS
C6.01 UTILITY PLAN
C9.01 DETAILS
C9.02 DETAILS
C9.03 DETAILS
C9.04 DETAILS
L1.01 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
L1.02 LANDSCAPE PLAN
L1.03 LANDSCAPE SHRUB PLAN
L1.04 LANDSCAPE DETAILS AND NOTES
EXHIBIT A TRUCK TURN EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT B PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
A-201 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
A-202 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
A-301 ELEVATIONS
A-302 ELEVATIONS
for
Preliminary Site Development Plans
BAPS Hindu Temple
BAPS Minneapolis LLC
Medina, Minnesota
Presented by:
NO SCALE
VICINITY MAP
SITE
CONSULTANT CONTACT LIST:
N.T.S.
CITY OF MEDINA SPECIFICATIONS (CURRENT)
CITY ENGINEER'S ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (2013)
MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (2018 EDITION)
GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS
HAMEL
R
O
A
D
55
AR
R
O
W
H
E
A
D
D
R
116
HACKAMORE RD
101
A-202 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
A-301 ELEVATIONS
A-302 ELEVATIONS
203 SITE DETAILS (TRASH ENCLOSURE)
1.SUBJECT PROPERTIES ADDRESS IS 1400 HAMEL ROAD, ITS PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS
11-118-23-23-0003.
2.THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 20.11 ACRES OR 875,873 SQUARE FEET. THE AREA
AFFECTED BY RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENTS FOR THE CITY OF MEDINA AND HENNEPIN COUNTY IS 0.49
ACRES OR 21,226 SQUARE FEET. THE AREA OF THE REMAINDER IS 19.62 ACRES OR 854,647 SQUARE
FEET.
3.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED BP - BUSINESS PARK, PER CITY OF MEDINA ONLINE ZONING MAP
ACCESSED 07/30/2021.
4.THE BUILDING(S) AND EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS OF THE OUTSIDE WALL AT GROUND LEVEL ARE SHOWN
ON THE SURVEY. IT MAY NOT BE THE FOUNDATION WALL.
Parcel 1:
The East 602 feet of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 118, Range 23, lying
North of the center line of Hamel Road
Parcel 2:
The East 602 feet of the part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township
118, Range 23, lying South of a line drawn Easterly parallel with the North line of said Southwest Quarter
of the Northwest Quarter, from a point on the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter distant 528 feet Southerly from the Northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 118, Range 23
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Torrens Property
1.The bearing system is based on the Hennepin County coordinate system, NAD83 (1986 Adjust), with an
assumed bearing of N 0° 18' 53" W for the West line of NW 1
4 , Section 11 , Township 118 , Range 23.
2.FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 07/29/2021.
1. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS BASED ON NAVD88.
BENCHMARK #1
MNDOT 2722 X
ELEV.=995.36
BENCHMARK #2
MNDOT 2722 AC
ELEV.=992.10
DESCRIPTION PROPERTY SUMMARY
BENCHMARKS
SURVEY NOTES
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS,
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD, BROOKLYN
CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS MANDIR
IN MEDINA
MEDINA,
MINNESOTA
1400 HAMEL ROAD
DJT
1/1
08/04/21
50157
OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL WIRE
LIGHT
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
GUY ANCHOR
UTILITY POLE
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
UNDERGROUND GAS
WOOD FENCE
BUILDING LINE
CONCRETE CURB
BITUMINOUS SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE
WET LAND
SIGN
FEMA FLOOD ZONE LINE
TREE LINE
FOUND MONUMENT
FOUND CAST IRON
MONUMENT
EASEMENT LINE
SETBACK LINE
RESTRICTED ACCESS
FOUND RIGHT-OF-WAY
MONUMENT
SET MONUMENT
MARKED LS 47092
SECTION LINE
UNDERLYING / ADJACENT LOT
TIE LINE
BOUNDARY LINE
DEED DISTANCE(100.00)
CONIFEROUS TREE
TRANSFORMER
BUILDING CANOPY
GAS METER
ELECTRIC MANHOLE
ELECTRIC METER
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
CABLE TV BOX
GATE VALVE / HYDRANT
SANITARY MANHOLE
CLEAN OUT
CULVERT
SPOT ELEVATION
CONTOUR
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
WIRE FENCE
DECIDUOUS TREE
NORTH
SCALE IN FEET
VICINITY MAP LEGEND
PI
N
T
O
D
R
SITE
TA
M
A
R
A
C
K
D
R
AR
R
O
W
H
E
A
D
D
R
SOO L
I
N
E
R
R
55
118
200100
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed LAND SURVEYOR
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
survey which is available upon request at Sambatek's,
Minnetonka, MN office.
08/04/2147092
Jason J. Howard
Sep 28, 2021 - 5:07pm - User:mlarson L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Survey\Sheets\50157 -EXCON.dwg
C2.02
EXISTING
CONDITIONS
(350' OVERLAP)
–
1
0
'
T
R
A
I
L
A
N
D
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
'
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20' D&U EASEMENT
RELOCATE
EXISTING
SIGN
REMOVE EXISTING
BUILDINGS
REMOVE EXISTING
DRIVEWAYS
REMOVE EXISTING
FENCING (TYP)AREAS OF TEMPORARY
WETLAND IMPACT FOR
FENCE REMOVAL
CONTRACTOR TO
COORDINATE
RELOCATION OF
EXISTING UTILITIES
REMOVE WELL PER
LOCAL AUTHORITY
STANDARDS
20'
20'
CURB AND PAVEMENT
REMOVAL FOR
WATERMAIN
CONNECTION. SEE
SHEET C6.01
SAWCUT EDGE OF HAMEL ROAD
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT FOR
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ACCESS
CONNECTION. SEE SITE PLAN
C3.01
80'
198'
SCALE IN FEET
0 12060
NORTH
Sep 28, 2021 - 5:08pm - User:mlarson L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-C2-DEMO.dwg
C2.03
DEMOLITION
PLAN
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,
Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/202153735
Pete S. Moreau
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED
ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING
SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE
CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY
HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE,
INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
LEGEND DEMOLITION NOTES
UNDERGROUND GAS
STONE RETAINING WALL
CHAIN LINK FENCE
WOOD FENCE
IRON FENCE
WIRE FENCE
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
UNDERGROUND CABLE TV
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
SANITARY SEWER
FORCE MAIN
WATERMAIN
DRAIN TILE
STORM SEWER
LIGHT
HYDRANT
GAS METER
SPRINKLER HEAD
SPRINKLER VALVE
GUARD RAIL
HANDRAIL
EDGE OF TREES
TREES / SHRUBS
CONCRETE
GUARD POLES
SIGNS
CONCRETE CURB
BITUMINOUS CURB
BUILDING
REMOVE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE
REMOVE EXISTING UTILITY
REMOVE EXISTING
REMOVE EXISTING TREE
REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING
REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT
REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
SAW CUT EXIST BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
REMOVE EXIST CONCRETE CURB
REMOVE EXISTING UTILITY LINE
EXISTING
REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE
REMOVE EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE
REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPING
1.DEMOLITION NOTES ARE NOT COMPREHENSIVE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION TO OBTAIN A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF THE INTENDED SCOPE OF WORK.
2.THE DESIGN SHOWN IS BASED ON ENGINEER'S UNDERSTANDING OF EXISTING CONDITIONS. THE
EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED UPON ALTA AND TOPOGRAPHIC
MAPPING PREPARED BY SAMBATEK DATED 08/09/2021. IF CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WITHOUT EXCEPTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL
HAVE MADE, AT OWN EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
AND SUBMIT IT TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW.
3.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSING IN A LOCATION
APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES, OF
ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE
STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC., SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS CAN BE
CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL
AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE GEOTECHNICAL
REPORT AND/OR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.
4.CLEARING AND GRUBBING: CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE
SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. [DELETE IF NOT
APPLICABLE]
5.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DISCONNECTION OF UTILITY SERVICES TO EXISTING
BUILDINGS PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OF THE BUILDINGS. [DELETE IF NOT APPLICABLE]
6.CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON
THIS PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE. ENGINEER ASSUMES NO
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE UTILITY MAPPING ACCURACY. PRIOR TO START OF ANY DEMOLITION
ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UTILITY COMPANIES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY
EXCAVATION FOR ON-SITE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES. THE LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES
SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CALLING MINNESOTA GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT
800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002.
7.THE MAPPING LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING, AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO
BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS THE ONLY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON
THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY
ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION
AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK.
UTILITIES DETERMINED TO BE ABANDONED SHALL BE REMOVED IF UNDER THE BUILDING
INCLUDING 10' BEYOND FOUNDATIONS.
8.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO REMOVAL
AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH UTILITY
COMPANIES CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY
COMPANIES' FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO UTILITY COMPANIES FOR
SERVICES. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES.
9.ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC CABLE AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE
REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY.
ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE
UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE.
CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE ROAD RIGHT OF
WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION.
10.CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES,
ENCLOSURES, ETC., TO THE BEST PRACTICES.
11.CONTINUOUS ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES
DURING DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING FACILITIES.
12.PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED AND
APPROVED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY.
13.CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT SAW-CUT & PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS
REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON
ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS
REMOVAL AND REPAIR.
14.CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING FEATURES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN. DAMAGE TO ANY
EXISTING CONDITIONS TO REMAIN WILL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
15.ABANDON OR REMOVE ALL SANITARY, WATER AND STORM SERVICES PER CITY STANDARDS.
COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH CITY. ALL STREET RESTORATION SHALL BE COMPLETED IN
COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL STANDARDS.
16.CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT TO THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY A TRAFFIC AND/OR
PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC PLAN PER CITY/COUNTY/STATE STANDARDS TO BE APPROVED BY THE
LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY.
5
0
'
B
L
D
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
3
5
'
P
R
K
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
F
B
B
B 3
J
A
AA
A
A
L
M
N
N
N
N
NN
N
RELOCATE EXISTING SIGN
O
17
2
.
3
'
172.4'
ATYP
TYP
O
24'
9'
TYP
9'
TY
P
30
'
195.8'
20'
TO BC
24'
F
F
F
TYP
TYP
I
EAST WETLAND
MANAGE 2
WEST WETLAND
MANAGE 1
H
A
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 45,980 SF
FFE=1000.00
2F - EAST POND
HWL100: 995.68
WQE : 994.50
BOT: 993.00
NO PARKING NO PARKING
NO PARKING NO PARKING
1
0
'
T
R
A
I
L
A
N
D
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
'
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20' D&U EASEMENT
3F - WEST POND
HWL100: 996.75
WQE: 996.50
BOT: 995.00
1F - NORTH POND
HWL100: 996.48
WQE: 994.50
BOT: 993.00
24
'
6.
7
'
8.
4
'
5.
7
'
15
.
7
'
21.6'
10'
6
'
5
'
SAWCUT BITUMINOUS
MEET & MATCH
EXISTING PAVEMENT
3' CURB
TRANSITION
19.8'6
6
.
7
'
8
0
'
SAWCUT BITUMINOUS
MEET & MATCH
EXISTING PAVEMENT
MATCH EXISTING
CURB & GUTTER
P252815
3
Q
O
R
30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER
WETLAND EDGE
20' MINIMUM WETLAND BUFFER
30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER
WETLAND EDGE
20' MINIMUM WETLAND BUFFER
PROPOSED AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER
(SEE WETLAND SUMMARY TABLE THIS SHEET)
WETLAND IMPACT AREA 846 SF
PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER
25' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER
WETLAND EDGE
20' MINIMUM WETLAND BUFFER
EXTENTS OF 15' ALTERNATE
MINIMUM BUFFER
PROPOSED AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER
(SEE WETLAND SUMMARY TABLE THIS SHEET)
20' PARKING SETBACK
30' BUILDING SETBACK
20 26 22
10
13
13
13
7
137
9
30' BUILDING SETBACK
20' BUILDING SETBACK
1
0
'
1
0
'
1
0
'
1
0
'
2
4
'
N
19
'
24
'
19
'
19
'
24
'
19
'
BJ
19'24'19'19'24'19'
I
7'
12
'
22
'
30
'
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
20
'
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
SCALE IN FEET
0 12060
NORTH
Sep 28, 2021 - 5:08pm - User:mlarson L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-C3-SITE.dwg
C3.01
SITE PLAN
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,
Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/202153735
Pete S. Moreau
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
1.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.
2.ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT “GUTTER OUT” WHERE WATER
DRAINS AWAY FROM CURB. ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS “GUTTER
IN” CURB. COORDINATE WITH GRADING CONTRACTOR.
4.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.
5.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
6.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF
EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE
LOCATIONS.
7.SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PYLON SIGN DETAILS
8.LIGHT STANDARD LOCATIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SITE LIGHTING PLAN IS DESIGN BUILD BY
CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM LIGHT STANDARD LOCATION WITH LIGHTING VENDOR.
OR SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION DETAIL AND FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF
LIGHT POLE.
9.REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, LOT NUMBERS, LOT AREAS, AND LOT DIMENSIONS.
10.ALL GRADIENTS ON SIDEWALKS ALONG THE ADA ROUTE HAVE BEEN DESIGNED WITH A MAXIMUM
LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 4.5%, AND A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 1.5%. THIS IS LESS THAN THE ADA
CODE MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 5% (1:20), EXCEPT AT CURB RAMPS (1:12), AND A MAXIMUM
CROSS SLOPE OF 2.00% (1:50). THE MAXIMUM DESIGN SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN ADA PARKING
STALL OR ACCESS AISLE IS 1.5%, LESS THAN THE ADA CODE MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN
ADA PARKING STALL OR ACCESS AISLE OF 2.00% (1:50). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY
THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD ALONG THE ADA ROUTES PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS
PAVEMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY
BETWEEN THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD VERSUS THE DESIGN GRADIENT AND COORDINATE WITH
GRADING CONTRACTOR.
11."NO PARKING" SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ALONG ALL DRIVEWAYS AS REQUIRED BY CITY.
12.STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY.
13.ANY WORK WITHIN HENNEPIN COUNTY REQUIRES A HENNEPIN COUNTY PERMIT. CONTRACTOR SHALL
OBTAIN APPLICABLE COUNTY PERMITS AND DOCUMENT RECEIPT TO CITY OF MEDINA.
CIVIL 3D MODEL LIMITATIONS
SAMBATEK'S DELIVERABLE AND GOVERNING DOCUMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE A HARD COPY
AND/OR PDF PLAN SHEETS. IF A CIVIL 3D MODEL IS GENERATED IN THE PROCESS OF PREPARING THE PLAN
SHEETS, IT IS AS A DESIGN TOOL ONLY AND NOT AS A SEPARATE DELIVERABLE. AT THE OWNER'S REQUEST,
WE WILL RELEASE OUR CIVIL 3D MODEL FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S USE. HOWEVER, ITS USE IS AT THE
CONTRACTOR'S RISK AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR STAKING OF CURB, SIDEWALK, OR OTHER HARD SURFACE
IMPROVEMENTS. IF A CIVIL 3D MODEL FOR STAKING HARD SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS IS REQUIRED, WE CAN
PROVIDE A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR REFINEMENT AND PREPARATION OF THE CIVIL 3D MODEL.
LEGEND
EASEMENT
CURB & GUTTER
BUILDING
RETAINING WALL
SAWCUT LINE
NUMBER OF PARKING
STALLS PER ROW
SIGN
PIPE BOLLARD
STANDARD DUTY
ASPHALT PAVING
HEAVY DUTY
ASPHALT PAVING
CONCRETE PAVING
PROPERTY LIMIT
EXISTINGPROPOSED
KEY NOTE
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
DEVELOPMENT NOTES KEY NOTES
WETLAND LIMITS
TREELINE
A.BUILDING, STOOPS, STAIRS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS)
B.B-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
C.NOT USED
D.CONCRETE APRON
E.FLAT CURB SECTION
F.CONCRETE SIDEWALK
G.SEGMENTAL BLOCK RETAINING WALL
H.ACCESSIBLE RAMP
I.ACCESSIBLE STALL STRIPING
J.ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN
K.TRANSFORMER
L.TRASH PAD AND 3-SIDED ENCLOSURE
M.PLAYGROUND
N.WETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT SIGN (EVERY 200')
O.FOXHOLE RAIN GUARDIAN
P.CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER (SEE DETAIL 05, SHEET C9.02)
Q.NOT USED
R.RAIN GUARDIAN BUNKER
XX
XX
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED
ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING
SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE
CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY
HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE,
INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
AREA
GROSS SITE AREA
IMPERVIOUS AREA ALLOWED
IMPERVIOUS AREA PROPOSED
BUILDING SETBACKS
FRONT YARD
REAR YARD
SIDE YARD
PARKING SETBACKS
FRONT YARD
REAR YARD
SIDE YARD
ZONING
EXISTING ZONING
PROPOSED ZONING
PARKING SUMMARY
PARKING REQUIRED (NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS/4 = REQUIRED STALLS)
PARKING PROVIDED
ADA REQUIRED
ADA PROVIDED
856,427 SF 19.62 AC (100)
599,499 SF 13.76 AC (70%)
160,993 SF 3.69 AC (19%)
50 FEET
30 FEET
30 FEET
50 FEET
20 FEET
20 FEET
BP - BUSINESS PARK
BP - BUSINESS PARK
500/4 = 125 STALLS
227 STALLS
7 STALLS
7 STALLS
PAVEMENT BY OTHERS
(SEE ARCHITECTURAL
PLANS)
PROPOSED POND
WETLAND SUMMARY
EAST WETLAND - MANAGE 2
AVERAGE BUFFER REQUIRED (30')
AVERAGE BUFFER PROVIDED
WEST WETLAND - MANAGE 1
AVERAGE BUFFER REQUIRED (25')
AVERAGE BUFFER PROVIDED
AREA OF WETLAND IMPACTED
52,620 SF
53,535 SF
15,084 SF
15,095 SF
846 SF
PROPOSED
WETLAND BUFFER
WETLAND IMPACT
AREA
1
0
0
5
1
0
0
4
1
0
0
6
1
0
0
7
1
0
0
8
992991
990
989
988
1
0
0
7
1
0
0
5
10
0
2
10
0
0
9
9
5
9
9
2
99
0
9
9
7
988
989
988
990
99
1
99
3
99
5 99
8
9
9
0
9
9
2
9
9
4
9
9
6
99
9
100
4
10
0
1
9
9
9
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
9
9
8
9
9
7
9
9
7
9
9
8
99
6
995
996
994
1000
1002
998
99
5
998
996
1003
1
0
0
3
10
0
3
1
0
0
5
1
0
0
6
1
0
0
4
1
0
0
3
1
0
0
3
1
0
0
4
1002
10
0
2
1002
1000 1002
998
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
1
10
0
4
100
3
1000
995
997
999
1002
998
997
996
99
4
9
9
2
1004
1003
1002
1000
998
996
9
9
8
1
0
0
0
10
0
2
10
0
4
1
0
0
7
1
0
0
8
1
0
1
0
1000
1001
10021003
1004
H
A
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 45,980 SF
FFE=1000.00
1000
9
9
9
100110021003
9
9
5
995
9
9
5
998
999
995
10
0
0
999
1
0
0
1
10
0
2
10
0
3
1
0
0
4
1
0
0
4
-2.9
%
-1.9%
-2
5
.
5
%
-2
.
3
%
-
2
.
2
%
-2
.
6
%
-2
.
6
%
996.71 997.15
996.74
T/W: 990.46
B/W: 998.13
T/W: 998.49
B/W: 992.07 2F - EAST POND
HWL100: 995.68
WQE : 994.50
BOT: 993.00
999.36
EOF
1001.30
1000.87
1000.71
E
O
F
99
5
995
EO
F
NO PARKING NO PARKING
NO PARKING NO PARKING
995
995
996
998.53
998.65
998.50
998.50
997.93
997.76
997.59
T/W: 998.82
B/W: 991.29
998.02 998.74
EOF
1000
9989
9
9
998.64
EO
F
-2.0%
999.00
998.74
1
0
0
0
9
9
9
10
0
1
10
0
2
10
0
3
10
0
4
100010011002100310001001
10
0
0
99899
9
10
0
1
1
0
0
2
E
O
F
1
0
0
1
E
O
F
1
0
0
2
.
2
1004.50
1003.75
1003.78
1000.20
1000.34
999.90
999.98999.23
999.07
999.88
1000.41
997.11997.39
999.78 999.90
997.22
999.68 999.67
997.81
1000.04
999.07
998.59
998.06
999.62
996.95997.43997.95
998.14998.59
-2.0%
998.60
998.79998.91
1000.00-1
.
4
%
-9
.
2
%
1000.00
999.43
999.35
999.33
999.01
1000.001000.00
999.29
999.09
998.52
998.30
-7
.
6
%
1000.00
1000.00
998.09
1000.00
998.25
1000.00
998.25999.25 999.25
9
9
5
1
0
0
0
9
9
4
9
9
6
9
9
7
9
9
8
9
9
9
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
1
0
0
2
1
0
0
3
1
0
0
3
1
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
999.96
999.41
9
9
3
9
9
3
9
9
7
99
3
993
99
7
997.00
998.50
998.50
997.00
997.25
997.25
998.50
998.50
997.34
998.74
998.85
998.65
997.18
EOF 997.19
3F - WEST POND
HWL100: 996.75
WQE: 996.50
BOT: 995.00
EO
F
10
0
3
.
5
0
998.00
996.50
997.25
997.25996.50
1004.54
1002.99
1003.27
1002.62
1003.07
1002.42
1002.79
1003.71
1001.97
1001.20
1002.45
1002.65
1001.40
1002.17
1003.91
1F - NORTH POND
HWL100: 996.48
WQE: 994.50
BOT: 993.00
SEE MNDOT DETAIL 3113D
ON SHEET C9.02 FOR RIP RAP
QUANTITY (TYP)
SCALE IN FEET
0 12060
NORTH
Sep 28, 2021 - 5:08pm - User:mlarson L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-C4-GRADE.dwg
C4.01
GRADING PLAN
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,
Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/202153735
Pete S. Moreau
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
902.5
X
902
SPOT ELEVATION
CONTOUR
RIP RAP
OVERFLOW ELEV.
CURB & GUTTER
BUILDING
RETAINING WALL
PROPERTY LIMIT
EXISTINGPROPOSED
LEGEND
WETLAND LIMITS
TREELINE
STORM SEWER
SOIL BORINGS
DRAINTILE
EOF
902.5
D
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED
ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING
SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE
CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY
HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE,
INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
2% MINIMUM SLOPE ON
VEGETATED SWALES (TYPICAL)
H
A
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 45,980 SF
FFE=1000.00
2F - EAST POND
HWL100: 995.68
WQE : 994.50
BOT: 993.00
NO PARKING NO PARKING
NO PARKING NO PARKING
1
0
'
T
R
A
I
L
A
N
D
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
'
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20' D&U EASEMENT
3F - WEST POND
HWL100: 996.75
WQE: 996.50
BOT: 995.00
1F - NORTH POND
HWL100: 996.48
WQE: 994.50
BOT: 993.00
HYDRANT
6" GATE VALVE
8" x 6" TEE
4" DOMESTIC WATER SERICE
CONNECT TO EXISTING 8"
PVC C900
6"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
HYDRANT
6" GATE VALVE
6" TEE
CONNECT TO EXISTING 8"
PVC C900
GREASE INTERCEPTOR
INLET IE=990.80
OUTLET IE=990.55
MH 01
RE=1006.77
IE=988.19 S
IE=988.19 E
IE=988.09 W
163 LF -8" SDR 35
@ 0.40%
8" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
IE=991.54 N
4" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
IE=991.58
4" PVC C900
RELOCATE EXISTING
HYDRANT
39 LF -4" PVC
SCH 40 @ 2.00%
8"x4" WYE
8" SANITARY
STUB
CONNECT TO EXISTING
MANHOLE
IE=987.44
CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL
NEW INFI-SHIELD
250' HYDRANT INFLUENCE
RADIUS (TYP)
8" PVC C
9
0
0
STUB FOR FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
6" PVC C900 6" FIRE SERVICE
4" CURB STOP
6" GATE VALVE
FIRE DEPARTMENT
CONNECTION
CONNECT TO EXISTING 8"
PVC C900
TEMPORARY
HYDRANT FOR
FLUSHING
167 LF -8" PVC
SCH 40 @ 2.00%
8" GATE VALVE
COORDINATE OFFSITE
IMPROVEMENTS WITH
ADJACENT OWNER
PIV
1
2
3
4
5
99 LF -4" SDR 35
@ 2.00%
CLEANOUT
RE=1002.09
IE=988.56 S
IE=988.56 N
SEE CROSSING
TABLE ON SHEET
C6.02
6
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
10'
12
'
SCALE IN FEET
0 12060
NORTH
Sep 28, 2021 - 5:09pm - User:mlarson L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-C6-UTIL.dwg
C6.01
UTILITY PLAN
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,
Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/202153735
Pete S. Moreau
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
1.THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
"STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS" AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF
MINNESOTA (CEAM), EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THESE
SPECIFICATIONS.
a.ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL
REQUIRMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY
AND MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REQUIREMENTS.
b.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPEN, TURN OFF, INTERFERE WITH, OR ATTACH ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO
OR TAP WATERMAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE
CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF
SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE THE LIABILITY OF CONTRACTOR.
c.A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES, AND HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10-FEET,
BETWEEN OUTSIDE PIPE AND/OR STRUCTURE WALLS, IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATERMAIN AND
SEWER MAIN (BUILDING, STORM AND SANITARY) CROSSINGS.
2.ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN.
a.ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.
b.ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR-35, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
i. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES TO BUILDING SHALL BE PVC SCH 40 CONFORMING TO ASTM
D2665.
ii. ALL SANITARY SEWER REQUIRE A "FLEX SEAL" OR APPROVED EQUAL AS SEALANT FOR
INTERIOR CHIMNEY SECTION.
c.ALL WATERMAIN TO BE DUCTILE IRON - CLASS 52, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
i. ALL WATERMAIN TO HAVE 7.5-FEET OF COVER OVER TOP OF WATERMAIN.
ii. PROVIDE THRUST BLOCKING AND MECHANICAL JOINT RESTRAINTS ON ALL WATERMAIN
JOINTS PER CITY STANDARDS.
d.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE SMOOTH INTERIOR DUAL WALL HDPE PIPE WITH WATERTIGHT
GASKETS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
i. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE FOR ROOF DRAIN SERVICES TO BUILDING SHALL BE PVC SCH 40
CONFORMING TO ASTM D2665.
e.RIP RAP SHALL BE Mn/DOT CLASS 3.
3.COORDINATE ALL BUILDING SERVICE CONNECTION LOCATIONS AND INVERT ELEVATIONS WITH
MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
4.ALL BUILDING SERVICE CONNECTIONS (STORM, SANITARY, WATER) WITH FIVE FEET OR LESS COVER
ARE TO BE INSULATED FROM BUILDING TO POINT WHERE 5-FEET OF COVER IS ACHIEVED.
5.CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO
ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR WILL
BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING
DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT.
6.SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION
PRACTICES, CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE
JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE
WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL
WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION
REVIEW OF CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE
ADEQUACY OF CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
7.ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL
PLACED BENEATH THE SOD.
8.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL
DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO
CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL
CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS.
9.ALL SOILS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT SOILS ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR
THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED
BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE UTILITY BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING
ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND SOIL INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. A GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEERING REPORT HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY:COMPANY:
ADDRESS:
PHONE:
DATED:
CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THIS SOILS REPORT.
10.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF SHOP DRAWINGS FOR MANHOLE AND CATCH BASIN
STRUCTURES TO SAMBATEK. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW 5 WORKING DAYS FOR SHOP DRAWING
REVIEW.
11.CONTRACTOR AND MATERIAL SUPPLIER SHALL DETERMINE THE MINIMUM DIAMETER REQUIRED
FOR EACH STORM SEWER STRUCTURE.
12.WHERE WATERMAIN CROSSES ANY STORM OR SANITARY SEWER, MAINTAIN 18-INCH SEPARATION
AND ADD 4" RIGID INSULATION TO WATERMAIN.
13.THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED WITH VARIATIONS IN
THE UTILITY ASBUILD PLANS, ELEVATIONS, OR LOCATIONS.
14.THE CITY WILL REQUIRE TELEVISING FOR SANITARY PIPE SEWER INSTALLATION PRIOR TO
ACCEPTING A WARRANTY FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS. PROVIDE AND REPORT VIDEO FILES TO THE CITY FOR
REVIEW.
TELEPHONE
ELECTRIC
GAS LINE
FORCEMAIN (SAN.)
EASEMENT
WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER
EXISTINGPROPOSED
STORM SEWER
CURB & GUTTER
DRAINTILE
D
S S
SLS
LEGENDUTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS
QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD
GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE
CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE
FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY
AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND
PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE
ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE
BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH
CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
FOXHOLE RAIN GUARDIAN
H
A
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 45,980 SF
FFE=1000.00
2F - EAST POND
HWL100: 995.68
WQE : 994.50
BOT: 993.00
NO PARKING NO PARKING
NO PARKING NO PARKING
1
0
'
T
R
A
I
L
A
N
D
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
'
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20' D&U EASEMENT
3F - WEST POND
HWL100: 996.75
WQE: 996.50
BOT: 995.00
1F - NORTH POND
HWL100: 996.48
WQE: 994.50
BOT: 993.00
1
0
0
5
1
0
0
4
1
0
0
6
1
0
0
7
1
0
0
8
992991
990
989
988
1
0
0
7
1
0
0
5
10
0
2
10
0
0
9
9
5
9
9
2
99
0
9
9
7
988
989
988
990
99
1
99
3
99
5 99
8
9
9
0
9
9
2
9
9
4
9
9
6
99
9
100
4
10
0
1
9
9
9
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
9
9
8
9
9
7
9
9
7
9
9
8
99
6
995
996
994
1000
1002
998
99
5
998
996
1003
1
0
0
3
10
0
3
1
0
0
5
1
0
0
6
1
0
0
4
1
0
0
3
1
0
0
3
1
0
0
4
1002
10
0
2
1002
1000 1002
998
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
1
10
0
4
100
3
1000
995
997
999
1002
998
997
996
99
4
9
9
2
1004
1003
1002
1000
998
996
9
9
8
1
0
0
0
10
0
2
10
0
4
1
0
0
7
1
0
0
8
1
0
1
0
1000
1001
10021003
1004
WHITE DECORATIVE ROCK
BL
3
PF
3
HT
3
3
HT1
PF
3
JL2
PF
SG
2
HT
3
3
JL
2
SO
1
PF
PF
4
BL
4
3
RB
3
WP
PF
1
HL
1
JL
2
JL
2
2
SO
SO
2
HL
1
HL
1
2
LR
2
LR
4
LR
3
RB
1
HL
BL
4
RB
2
PF
3
PF
2
SO
5
SG
3
2
SG
1
HL
1
HL
JL
2
SG
3
2
PE
2
PE
2
PE 2
PE
RB
3
2
PE
PF
2
JL
1
3
RB
WP
3
2
PE
3
BS
3
LR
BS
6
LR
4
2
WP 2
BS 2
WP
BS
2 WP
2 HL
1
HL
1
HL
1
SCALE IN FEET
0 12060
NORTH
Oct 06, 2021 - 5:13pm - User:mlong L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-L1-LSCP.dwg
L1.02
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
This certification is not valid unless wet signed in blue
ink. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of
this survey which is available upon request at
Sambatek, Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/202159119
John R. Workman
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS
ONE OVERSTORY TREE PER 50 FT
ONE ORNAMENTAL TREE PER 100 FT
ONE SHRUB PER 30 FT
TREE REPLACMENT
REPLACEMENT INCHES FROM TREE PRESERVATION PLAN (L1.01)
TOTAL TREES
LEGEND
EASEMENT
CURB & GUTTER
BUILDING
RETAINING WALL
SIGN
PIPE BOLLARD
STANDARD DUTY
ASPHALT PAVING
CONCRETE PAVING
PROPERTY LIMIT
EXISTINGPROPOSED
MEDINA LANDSCAPE CODE
PLANT SCHEDULE
WETLAND LIMITS
TREELINE
PROPOSED
112
41
212
32.5" (13)
153 TREES
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
S
S
SANITARY SEWER
LANDSCAPE EDING
STORM SEWER
WATERMAIN
FORCEMAIN (SAN.)
YARDDRAIN
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
D
S
LS
REQUIRED
82
41
137
31"
Overstory Deciduous Shade Trees and Coniferous Trees- A minimum of one tree per 50 feet, or fraction
thereof, of lot perimeter shall be required. Deciduous trees shall not be less than 2.5 caliper inches
measured four feet off ground, and coniferous trees shall not be less than six feet in height. No more than
25 percent of trees may be of a single species.
Ornamental Trees- A minimum of one tree per 100 feet, or fraction thereof, of lot perimeter shall be
required. Trees shall not be less than two caliper inches measured four feet off ground. No more than 25
percent of trees may be of a single species.
Understory Shrubs- In addition to trees, a full compliment of understory shrubs shall be provided to
complete a quality landscape treatment of the lot. The number of shrubs be less than one per 30 feet, or
fraction thereof, of lot perimeter.
TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY
SG Acer freemanii `Sienna Glen` / Sienna Glen Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 10
RB Betula nigra `Cully` TM / Heritage Birch B & B 2.5"Cal 14
HL Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline` / Skyline Honey Locust B & B 2.5"Cal 11
SO Quercus bicolor / Swamp White Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 11
BL Tilia americana `Boulevard` / Boulevard Linden B & B 2.5"Cal 13
PE Ulmus americana `Princeton` / American Elm B & B 2.5"Cal 12
CONIFERS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY
LR Larix laricina / Tamarack B & B 6`15
BS Picea glauca densata / Black Hills Spruce B & B 6`14
WP Pinus strobus / White Pine B & B 6`12
ORN. TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY
HT Crataegus crus-galli `Inermis` / Thornless Hawthorn B & B 2.5"Cal 9
PF Malus x `Prairifire` / Prairifire Crab Apple B & B 2"Cal 19
JL Syringa reticulata / Japanese Tree Lilac B & B 2"Cal 13
TREE SCHEDULE
SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY
BJ Juniperus sabina `Broadmoor` / Broadmoor Juniper 5 gal 60
PT Potentilla fruticosa `Fargo` TM / Fargo Potentilla 5 gal 43
GL Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low` / Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 5 gal 27
AC Ribes alpinum / Alpine Currant 5 gal 51
TT Thuja occidentalis `Techny` / Techny Arborvitae 5 gal 31
GRASSES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY
KFG Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster` / Feather Reed Grass 1 gal 155
PERENNIALS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY
SBA Allium x `Summer Beauty` / Summer Beauty Allium 1 gal 58
BLF Gaillardia x grandiflora `Arizona Sun` / Blanketflower 1 gal 60
BIG Geranium x cantabrigiense `Biokovo` / Biokovo Cranesbill 1 gal 61
OBH Heuchera x `Obsidian` / Coral Bells 1 gal 124
SHRUB SCHEDULE
RIP-RAP
GROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT
25-131 MNDOT Seed Mix 25-131 / Low Maintenance Fescue mix Seed
33-261 MNDOT Seed Mix 33-261 / Ponds and Wet Areas Seed
35-241 MNDOT Seed Mix 35-241 / Mesic Praire General Seed
GROUNDCOVER SCHEDULE
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 45,980 SF
FFE=1000.00
NO PARKING NO PARKING
NO PARKING
999
1002
998
997
996
99
4
9
9
2
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
WHITE DECORATIVE ROCK
3
GL
4
AC
5
BJ
4
GL
5
BJ
4
BJ
KFG
22 18
OBH
TT
20
BJ
2
17
OBH
12
KFG
14
OBH
7
BJAC
18
24
BLF
9
KFG
AC
5
BJ
10
11
BLF
59
KFG
32
OBH
BJ
11
AC
16
53
KFG 28
OBH
25
BLF
GL
16
BJ
16
TT
3
PT
7
15
OBH
9
BIG
GL
4
TT
4 8
PTTT
4 4
ACPT
8
AC
4
HAMEL R
O
A
D
9
9
8
1
0
0
3
PT
20
BIG
52SBA
58
SCALE IN FEET
0 4020
NORTH
Oct 06, 2021 - 5:13pm - User:mlong L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-L1-LSCP.dwg
L1.03
LANDSCAPE
SHRUB PLAN
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
This certification is not valid unless wet signed in blue
ink. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of
this survey which is available upon request at
Sambatek, Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/202159119
John R. Workman
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
BUFFER YARD LANDSCAPE SUMMARY
EAST BUFFER YARD (320 LF)
SOUTH BUFFER YARD (132 LF)
LEGEND
EASEMENT
CURB & GUTTER
BUILDING
RETAINING WALL
SIGN
PIPE BOLLARD
STANDARD DUTY
ASPHALT PAVING
CONCRETE PAVING
PROPERTY LIMIT
EXISTINGPROPOSED
MEDINA LANDSCAPE CODE
PLANT SCHEDULE
WETLAND LIMITS
TREELINE
PROPOSED
(SHRUB) 612
(TREE) 350
235
1,197
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
S
S
SANITARY SEWER
LANDSCAPE EDING
STORM SEWER
WATERMAIN
FORCEMAIN (SAN.)
YARDDRAIN
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
D
S
LS
POINTS REQUIRED
1,197
745
Overstory Deciduous Shade Trees and Coniferous Trees- A minimum of one tree per 50 feet, or fraction
thereof, of lot perimeter shall be required. Deciduous trees shall not be less than 2.5 caliper inches
measured four feet off ground, and coniferous trees shall not be less than six feet in height. No more than
25 percent of trees may be of a single species.
Ornamental Trees- A minimum of one tree per 100 feet, or fraction thereof, of lot perimeter shall be
required. Trees shall not be less than two caliper inches measured four feet off ground. No more than 25
percent of trees may be of a single species.
Understory Shrubs- In addition to trees, a full compliment of understory shrubs shall be provided to
complete a quality landscape treatment of the lot. The number of shrubs be less than one per 30 feet, or
fraction thereof, of lot perimeter.
SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY
BJ Juniperus sabina `Broadmoor` / Broadmoor Juniper 5 gal 60
PT Potentilla fruticosa `Fargo` TM / Fargo Potentilla 5 gal 43
GL Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low` / Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 5 gal 27
AC Ribes alpinum / Alpine Currant 5 gal 51
TT Thuja occidentalis `Techny` / Techny Arborvitae 5 gal 31
GRASSES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY
KFG Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster` / Feather Reed Grass 1 gal 155
PERENNIALS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY
SBA Allium x `Summer Beauty` / Summer Beauty Allium 1 gal 58
BLF Gaillardia x grandiflora `Arizona Sun` / Blanketflower 1 gal 60
BIG Geranium x cantabrigiense `Biokovo` / Biokovo Cranesbill 1 gal 61
OBH Heuchera x `Obsidian` / Coral Bells 1 gal 124
SHRUB SCHEDULE
RIP-RAP
PAGE 1 OF 1
Da
t
e
:
9
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
1
Sc
a
l
e
:
A
S
N
O
T
E
D
Revisions
#
D
a
t
e
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
GENERAL NOTES:
A. PULSE PRODUCTS DOES NOT ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY
FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF THIS CALCULATION OR
COMPLAINCE TO THE LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL
LIGHTNG CODES OR ORDINANCES.
B. LIGHTING LAYOUT IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS BUT ONLY TO ILLUSTRATE THE PERFORMANCE
OF THE PRODUCT.
C. ALL READINGS/CALCULATIONS SHOWN ARE SHOWN ON
OBJECTS/SURFACES.ME
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
Ch
e
c
k
e
d
B
y
:
J
I
L
L
Dr
a
w
n
B
y
:
S
A
N
D
Y
A
N
D
E
R
S
O
N
,
L
C
BA
P
S
H
I
N
D
U
T
E
M
P
L
E
Luminaire Schedule
Symbol Qty Label Arrangement LLF
Calculation Summary
Description Arr. Watts Lum. Lumens
Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min
EAST PROPERTY LINE
2 AA4 Single 0.900 GARDCO ECF-S-32L-1A-NW-G2-4 MOUNT ON 20FT POLE WITH 2FTBASE 105.6 14006
Illuminance Fc 0.01 0.1
7 AA2 Single 0.900 GARDCO ECF-S-32L-1A-NW-G2-2 MOUNT ON 20FT POLE WITH 2FT BASE 105.6
0.0 N.A.N.A.
NORTH PORERTY LINE Illuminance Fc 0.00 0.0 0.0
13685
N.A.N.A.
SITE GROUND Illuminance Fc 0.63 6.9 0.0 N.A.N.A.
SOUTH PROPERTY LINE Illuminance Fc 0.07 0.2 0.0 N.A.N.A.
WEST PROPERTY LINE Illuminance Fc 0.09 0.2
6 AA52 Back-Back 0.900 GARDCO ECF-S-32L-1A-NW-G2-5W MOUNT ON 20FT POLE WITH 2FT BASE 211.2 13923
0.0 N.A.N.A.
EAST PARKING Illuminance Fc 1.63 2.8 0.8 2.04 3.50
NORTH PARKING Illuminance Fc 1.43 1.9 1.2 1.19 1.58
WEST PARKING Illuminance Fc 1.65 6.2 0.7 2.36 8.86
Plan View
Scale: 1 inch= 60 Ft.
C O
FFE=1002.00
NO PARKING NO PARKING
NO PARKING NO PARKING
H
A
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
LORAM A D D I T I O N
CIC 2067
C
A
P
I
T
A
LK
N
O
L
L
H
A
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
H
C
S
A
H
1
1
5
,
P
L
A
T
8
4
(
O
L
D
C
O
R
D
N
O
9
)
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
AA2
AA52AA52AA52 AA52 AA52
AA52
AA2
AA4 AA4
AA2
AA2
AA2
AA2
AA2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.1 1.7 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.3 1.9 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.6 2.8 2.5 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.5 3.6 5.3 6.4 4.2 1.9 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.3 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.4 3.2 4.5 5.7 5.1 3.5 2.0 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.4 2.5 3.6 3.4 2.3 1.5 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.8 1.2 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.6 2.3 3.0 3.2 2.9 2.2 1.6 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.4 2.1 3.4 5.1 6.6 5.7 3.9 2.7 1.8 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.7 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.4 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.2 3.0 3.7 4.2 3.8 3.0 2.4 1.8 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.8 2.5 3.7 5.3 5.9 3.5 1.4 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.7 1.1 1.8 2.1 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.4 4.9 6.0 5.0 3.3 1.9 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.1 1.0 1.9 2.3 2.0 1.1 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.6 3.3 3.4 3.0 2.3 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.2 0.8 2.0 2.8 2.5 1.0 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.6 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.3 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.7 2.2 3.6 3.6 1.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.3 3.2 4.4 5.1 3.0 1.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.1 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.7 2.5 4.8 5.4 1.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.2 3.1 4.5 6.3 5.9 3.5 1.5 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.8 2.9 5.6 6.5 1.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.7 3.8 4.1 3.5 2.4 1.3 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 1.1 2.8 4.7 4.6 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.5 2.1 2.4 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.6 2.9 2.8 2.3 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.4 2.7 2.6 2.1 1.6 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 1.3 2.6 3.4 2.6 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.3 3.2 3.8 3.7 2.7 2.0 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.3 3.2 3.6 3.5 2.5 1.8 1.3 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.4 3.3 4.3 4.7 4.2 3.2 2.3 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.7 1.4 2.1 2.3 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.9 3.1 4.0 3.7 2.5 1.4 0.9 0.7 0.9 1.3 2.3 3.5 4.5 3.9 2.6 1.6 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.4 2.3 3.7 5.6 6.9 5.3 3.5 2.1 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.6 1.2 1.6 1.5 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.4 2.0 2.4 1.9 1.3 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.9 1.2 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.2 2.9 3.5 4.1 4.2 3.6 3.0 2.3 1.7 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.4 2.0 3.0 4.4 6.1 6.2 4.6 3.2 2.1 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.6 2.6 3.9 4.0 2.7 1.7 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
TYPE AA
UP
33
A
A
55
44
66
22
11
B
B
C
C
D
D
E
E
G
G
F
F
4581 SF
PRAYER HALL
201
5042 SF
GYM / DINNING
226
1188 SF
STORAGE
224
672 SF
KITCHEN
222
332 SF
WALK IN-
COOLER
225
974 SF
BOOK STORE
221
190 SF
STORAGE
203
445 SF
STORAGE
205
1332 SF
STAGE
209
1670 SF
ADDITIONAL SEATING
211
13
'
-
3
3
/
4
"
10
'
-
8
"
50
'
-
8
"
10
'
-
6
1
/
2
"
21
'
-
9
1
/
2
"
12
'
-
8
"
36
'
-
1
0
1
/
4
"
13
'
-
3
3
/
4
"
10
'
-
8
"
83
'
-
0
1
/
4
"
12
'
-
8
"
36
'
-
1
0
1
/
4
"
1006 SF
VISTING
PRIEST RES.
207
1034 SF
PRIEST RES.
206
277 SF
RESTROOMS
223155 SF
OFFICE
202
128 SF
CRY ROOM
212
108 SF
OFFICE
214
128 SF
CRY ROOM
213
108 SF
OFFICE
215
24' - 4"59' - 8 3/4"61' - 0"12' - 0"71' - 4 1/4"12' - 0"65' - 11 1/4"10' - 8"
317' - 0 1/4"
DROP-OFF
15
6
'
-
6
1
/
4
"
15
6
'
-
6
1
/
4
"
WALKWAY
I
I
H
H
277 SF
RESTROOMS
228
96 SF
DONATION
229
96 SF
INFO DESK
230
151 SF
PANTRY
235
565 SF
CLASSROOM
236416 SF
CLASSROOM
237
578 SF
CLASSROOM
239
1264 SF
CORRIDOR
240
321 SF
CLASSROOM
241
336 SF
CLASSROOM
242
336 SF
CLASSROOM
243
330 SF
CLASSROOM
244
325 SF
CLASSROOM
246
340 SF
CLASSROOM
247
340 SF
CLASSROOM
248
334 SF
CLASSROOM
249
596 SF
CLASSROOM
250
96 SF
OFFICE
251
138 SF
STORAGE
254
71 SF
STORAGE
255
97 SF
OFFICE
256
97 SF
AV / IT
257
3334 SF
ASSEMBLY HALL
262
297 SF
STORAGE
263
603 SF
ADMIN MEETING
264
102 SF
RESTRM
270
648 SF
CORRIDOR
271
102 SF
RESTRM
272
646 SF
CORRIDOR
273
259 SF
GREEN RM
276
169 SF
STORAGE
278125 SF
GREEN RM
279
133 SF
GREEN RM
280
97 SF
STORAGE
281
1601 SF
LOBBY
282
1822 SF
CORRIDOR
283
564 SF
CLASSROOM
285
547 SF
CLASSROOM
286
1861 SF
CORRIDOR
294
MENS
RESTROOM
295
SHOES
296
SHOES
297
WOMENS
RESTROOM
298
JJ
KK
WALKWAY
WALKWAY
WALKWAY
SCALE
DATE
DRAWN
PROJECT NO
BH
A
R
A
T
R
P
A
T
E
L
,
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
,
I
N
C
.
50
5
7
N
O
R
T
H
E
R
N
L
I
G
H
T
S
D
R
,
G
R
E
E
N
A
C
R
E
S
,
F
L
-
3
3
4
6
3
(P
)
:
5
6
1
-
4
2
4
-
9
5
4
0
(
F
)
:
5
6
1
-
3
2
7
-
2
3
7
6
ww
w
.
b
r
p
a
r
c
h
.
c
o
m
FL
O
R
I
D
A
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
E
D
F
I
R
M
,
L
I
C
.
N
O
A
A
2
6
0
0
1
9
2
3
BRP
AS-SHOWN
8/
2
0
/
2
0
2
1
1
1
:
4
9
:
1
2
A
M
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
P
L
A
C
E
O
F
W
O
R
S
H
I
P
14
0
0
H
A
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
(
K
E
S
2
0
2
0
-15
5
)
ME
D
I
N
A
,
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
GR
O
U
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
A-201
08.20.2021
BA
P
S
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
DE
S
I
G
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
2021-13
1/16" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN
PROPOSED FLOOR AREA :
GROUND FLOOR : 43780 SQ.FT
SECOND FLOOR : 2200 SQ.FT.
TOTAL FLOOR AREA : 45980 SQ.FT.
PRAYER HALL : 6600 SQ.FT.
PREIST RESIDENCE : 4440 SQ.FT.
ASSEMBLY HALL : 8560 SQ.FT.
GYM/ DININIG HALL : 5042 SQ.FT.
KITCHEN : 1200 SQ.FT.
CLASSROOMS : 8580 SQ.FT.
LOBBY SERVICES & 11558 SQ.FT
CIRCULATION :
TOTAL : 45980 SQ.FT.
FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS
PROPOSED OCCUPANTS
SEATING : 480
STAFF AND VOLUNTERS : 20
TOTAL OCCUPANTS : 500
SECTION 828.151 OFF STREET PARKING
STANDARDS :
PARKING REQUIRED : 500 seats/4 125
PARKING PROVIDED : 250
PARKING CALCULATIONS
PROJECT DATA :
WATER : 75 GPM
WASTE WATER : 10,720 GPD
ESTIMATED WATER AND SEWER
USAGE :
Revisions
Rev# Rev Date Description
UP
21
B
C
65
'
-
1
1
1
/
4
"
36' - 10 1/4"
VISTING
PRIEST RES.
207
PRIEST RES.
206
SCALE
DATE
DRAWN
PROJECT NO
BH
A
R
A
T
R
P
A
T
E
L
,
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
,
I
N
C
.
50
5
7
N
O
R
T
H
E
R
N
L
I
G
H
T
S
D
R
,
G
R
E
E
N
A
C
R
E
S
,
F
L
-
3
3
4
6
3
(P
)
:
5
6
1
-
4
2
4
-
9
5
4
0
(
F
)
:
5
6
1
-
3
2
7
-
2
3
7
6
ww
w
.
b
r
p
a
r
c
h
.
c
o
m
FL
O
R
I
D
A
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
E
D
F
I
R
M
,
L
I
C
.
N
O
A
A
2
6
0
0
1
9
2
3
BRP
AS-SHOWN
8/
2
0
/
2
0
2
1
1
1
:
4
9
:
1
2
A
M
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
P
L
A
C
E
O
F
W
O
R
S
H
I
P
14
0
0
H
A
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
(
K
E
S
2
0
2
0
-15
5
)
ME
D
I
N
A
,
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
SE
C
O
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
A-202
08.20.2021
BA
P
S
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
DE
S
I
G
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
2021-13
Revisions
Rev# Rev Date Description
1/8" = 1'-0"1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN-PRIEST RESIDENCE
CHAIN
-LINK GATE SYSTEM, BLACK
VINYL COVERED, WITH VINYL
SLATS, 1/4" THK., INDUSTRIAL
STYLE, MIN. 25 YR. WARRANTY
TYPE, TYP. (6" GALV. STL. GATE
POST, CONC.
-FILLED, SET IN PIER
BELOW SLAB, TYP.)
GATE SWING TO 105 DEG. IN
THE OPEN POSITION
SLOPED SLAB AT 1/8"/FOOT
MIN. THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF
THE SLAB MUST BE
MAINTAINED LEVEL FOR MIN.
OF 8" AS SHOWN
8" THICK CONC. SLAB W/
18" THICKENED SLAB
EDGE AT PERIMETER W/
(2) #5 RODS CONT.,
PROVIDE SEALER
(1) YARD ROLL-OUT
DUMPSTERS PROVIDED
BY OWNER - RECYCLING
CONTRACTED DIRECT
BY OWNER
6" DIA. CONC. FILLED
PIPE BOLLARDS 4'-0" HT.
W/ MIN. 3'-6" BELOW
GRADE SET IN CONC. MIN.
18" - SEE DETAIL TYP.
BOLLARD DET.
A-203
2
A-2033A-203 4
0'
-
8
1
/
4
"
12
'
-
0
"
0'
-
8
1
/
4
"
GROUND FLOOR
PLAN
12' -0"
7'
-
4
"
STUCCO
PAINTED
MATCHED
BUILDING
COLOURED
GROUND FLOOR
PLAN
12' -0"
7'
-
4
"
STUCCO
PAINTED
MATCHED
BUILDING
COLOURED
GROUND FLOOR
PLAN
12' -0"
STUCCO
PAINTED
MATCHED
BUILDING
COLOURED
7'
-
4
"
SCALE
DATE
DRAW
N
PROJECT NO
BH
A
R
A
T
R
P
A
T
E
L
,
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
,
IN
C
.
50
5
7
N
O
R
T
H
E
R
N
L
I
G
H
T
S
D
R
,
G
R
E
E
N
A
C
R
E
S
,
F
L
-
3
3
4
6
3
(P
)
:
5
6
1
-
4
2
4
-
9
5
4
0
(
F
)
:
5
6
1
-
3
2
7
-
2
3
7
6
ww
w
.
b
r
p
a
r
c
h
.
c
o
m
FL
O
R
I
D
A
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
E
D
F
I
R
M
,
L
I
C
.
N
O
A
A
2
6
0
0
1
9
2
3
BRP
AS-
SHOWN
01
-
0
9
-
2
0
2
1
0
8
:
3
1
:
4
8
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
P
L
A
C
E
O
F
W
O
R
S
H
I
P
14
0
0
H
A
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
(
K
E
S
2
0
2
0
-15
5
)
ME
D
I
N
A
,
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
SI
T
E
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
A-203
07.31.2021
BA
P
S
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
DE
S
I
G
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
2021-13
Revisions
Rev# Rev Date Description
1/4" = 1'-0"1 ENLARGED DUMPSTER
1/4" = 1'-0"2 DUMPSTER ELE. -SIDE
1/4" = 1'-0"3 DUMPSTER ELE. -BACK
1/4" = 1'-0"4 DUMPSTER ELE. FRONT
T.O. ASSEMBLY
BLDG
34' -0"
GROUND FLOOR
PLAN
0' -0"
3 54 621
RES. 2ND FLR
12' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
38' -0"
4'
-
0
"
34
'
-
0
"
J K
3
4
5
FLOOR PLAN
0' -0"
T.O. ASSEMBLY
BLDG
34' -0"
GROUND FLOOR
PLAN
0' -0"
A B C D E GF
T.O. PARAPET
38' -0"
IH
38
'
-
0
"
34
'
-
0
"
4'
-
0
"
6
7
6
3
5
2
1
MI
D
P
T
.
O
F
S
P
I
R
E
33
'
-
0
"
SCALE
DATE
DRAWN
PROJECT NO
BH
A
R
A
T
R
P
A
T
E
L
,
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
,
I
N
C
.
50
5
7
N
O
R
T
H
E
R
N
L
I
G
H
T
S
D
R
,
G
R
E
E
N
A
C
R
E
S
,
F
L
-
3
3
4
6
3
(P
)
:
5
6
1
-
4
2
4
-
9
5
4
0
(
F
)
:
5
6
1
-
3
2
7
-
2
3
7
6
ww
w
.
b
r
p
a
r
c
h
.
c
o
m
FL
O
R
I
D
A
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
E
D
F
I
R
M
,
L
I
C
.
N
O
A
A
2
6
0
0
1
9
2
3
BRP
AS-SHOWN
9/
2
7
/
2
0
2
1
4
:
4
5
:
2
4
P
M
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
P
L
A
C
E
O
F
W
O
R
S
H
I
P
14
0
0
H
A
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
(
K
E
S
2
0
2
0
-15
5
)
ME
D
I
N
A
,
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
A-301
07.31.2021
BA
P
S
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
DE
S
I
G
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
2021-13
1/16" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'-0"3 EAST ELEVATION
Revisions
Rev# Rev Date Description
STUCCO
BUILDING MATERIAL
GLASS
METAL
CONCRETE
TOTAL MAIN BUILDING MATERIALS
AREA MATERIAL
PERCENTAGE
4345
624
1941 20%
7%
45%
TOTAL 9680
SQFT.
SQFT.
SQFT.
SQFT.
STUCCO
BUILDING MATERIAL
GLASS
METAL
CONCRETE
TOTAL MAIN BUILDING MATERIALS
AREA MATERIAL
PERCENTAGE
1057
568
2132 34%
10%
16%
TOTAL 6271
SQFT.
SQFT.
SQFT.
SQFT.100%
100%
2770 28%SQFT.
2514 SQFT.40%
T.O. ASSEMBLY
BLDG
34' -0"
GROUND FLOOR
PLAN
0' -0"
3546 2 1
T.O. PARAPET
38' -0"
38
'
-
0
"
T.O. CLASSROOM
16' -0"
4'
-
0
"
34
'
-
0
"
JK
3
6
4
3
5
T.O. ASSEMBLY
BLDG
34' -0"
GROUND FLOOR
PLAN
0' -0"
ABCDEGF
T.O. PARAPET
38' -0"
I H
T.O. CLASSROOM
16' -0"
4'
-
0
"
34
'
-
0
"
38
'
-
0
"
3
3
7
7
2
1
MI
D
P
T
.
O
F
S
P
I
R
E
33
'
-
0
"
SCALE
DATE
DRAWN
PROJECT NO
BH
A
R
A
T
R
P
A
T
E
L
,
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
,
I
N
C
.
50
5
7
N
O
R
T
H
E
R
N
L
I
G
H
T
S
D
R
,
G
R
E
E
N
A
C
R
E
S
,
F
L
-
3
3
4
6
3
(P
)
:
5
6
1
-
4
2
4
-
9
5
4
0
(
F
)
:
5
6
1
-
3
2
7
-
2
3
7
6
ww
w
.
b
r
p
a
r
c
h
.
c
o
m
FL
O
R
I
D
A
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
E
D
F
I
R
M
,
L
I
C
.
N
O
A
A
2
6
0
0
1
9
2
3
BRP
AS-SHOWN
9/
2
7
/
2
0
2
1
4
:
4
5
:
3
1
P
M
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
P
L
A
C
E
O
F
W
O
R
S
H
I
P
14
0
0
H
A
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
(
K
E
S
2
0
2
0
-15
5
)
ME
D
I
N
A
,
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
A-302
07.31.2021
BA
P
S
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
DE
S
I
G
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
2021-13
1/16" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION
MATERIAL LEGEND
KEY
VALUE DESCRIPTION
1 INDIAN DECORATIVE ELEMENT-SPIRE. PREFAB GALV. ALUMNIUM
2 INDIAN DECORATIVE ELEMENT-DOME. PREFAB GALV. ALUMNIUM
3 INDIAN DECORATIVE ELEMENT-PARAPET WALL BAND. EFIS
4 FACADE ALUMINIUM CLADDING. -KYNAR-SANDSTONE
5 ALUMINIUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM. -KYNAR-BRUSHED ALUMINIUM
6 POLYCARBOANTE FACADE PANELS.
7 PAINTED TEXTURED STUCCO.
Revisions
Rev# Rev Date Description
STUCCO
BUILDING
GLASS
METAL
CONCRETE
TOTAL MAIN BUILDING
AREA MATERIAL
PERCENTAGE
1105
568
495 8%
9%
16%
TOTAL 6669
SQFT.
SQFT.
SQFT.
SQFT.
STUCCO
BUILDING
GLASS
METAL
CONCRETE
TOTAL MAIN BUILDING
AREA MATERIAL
PERCENTAGE
1335
628
2371 24%
6%
13%
TOTAL 10089
SQFT.
SQFT.
SQFT.
SQFT.100%
100%
4501 67%SQFT.
5755 57%SQFT.
Ditter Cooling, Heating and Electric Page 1 of 5 October 19, 2021
Sign Ordinance Amendment City Council Meeting
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: October 14, 2021
MEETING: October 19, 2021 Planning Commission
SUBJ: Ordinance Amendment – Sign Regulations - Ditter Cooling, Heating, Electric
Summary of Request
Ditter Cooling, Heating, and Electric has requested that the City consider various amendments to
its sign ordinance. The applicant operates at 820 Tower Drive, west of Pinto Drive and the
applicant’s property backs up to Highway 55. The applicant is interested in installing a dynamic
display to advertise its business but believes existing City regulations may limit the effectiveness
of such a sign. The primary changes pertain to increasing the comparatively lower size and
height allowances for signs in certain districts and to allow larger dynamic displays adjacent to
roads with greater speed limits.
Railroad right-of-way exists between the applicant’s property and Highway 55 (highlighted in
yellow in the aerial to the
right). Originally, staff and
the applicant had discussed
whether to limit the proposed
amendments to this type of
situation in recognition that
their property sits 100 feet
further from the Highway
than other properties.
However, in the end, staff
believed it was appropriate to
discuss the changes more
broadly for all properties.
Staff has attached the entire
sign ordinance with the
applicant’s proposed changes
shown. Generally, an
ordinance will exclude
subsections which are not
proposed to be amended, but
staff thought it would be
helpful to have the entire
ordinance for context.
Agenda Item #9A
Ditter Cooling, Heating and Electric Page 2 of 5 October 19, 2021
Sign Ordinance Amendment City Council Meeting
Size/Height of Signs Adjacent to Arterial Roadways
The applicant’s property is zoned Commercial-General (CG). The CG and certain other districts
are currently more restrictive in terms of signage than other commercial and business districts.
The reason for this is because the CG and Business Park zoning districts tend to be less
retail/service oriented (more warehouse/office) and are more proximate to residential areas.
However, there are situations, such as the applicant’s property, where the “front” of the property
may be internal to a smaller, less intensive development area, but the property also backs up onto
a major roadway.
The proposed amendment would allow the same size and height for signage along a principal
arterial roadway that is permitted in the more intensive commercial/business districts. This
language can be found on page 9 of the ordinance.
Staff believes it is reasonable for CG and BP properties along Highway 55 to have the same
signage allowance as the other commercial/business district. The Planning Commission
recommended that the allowance be provided along principal arterials, but not all minor arterial
roads. Minor arterials with CG/BP property would include CR116 and potentially CR19 near
Highway 55 in the future.
Dynamic Display Size
Current regulations limit Dynamic Displays (electronic message centers) to no more than 50% of
the size of any sign and limit to no more than 32 square feet.
The applicant proposes to increase the size of dynamic displays on roadways with higher speed
limits based on the following table. The proposed changes are on page 15 of the ordinance.
The applicant has stated that sign manufactures and the US Sign Council both advocate for sizes
in this range for safe and effective messaging.
For the sake of comparison, the following table describes the area of other dynamic displays
within the City. Some of these signs are larger than currently permitted, presumably because
they pre-dated the limitation currently in code.
Medina Entertainment Center 500 Highway 55 54 sq. ft.
Highway 55 Rental 225 Highway 55 38 sq. ft.
Okalee Senior Living 2225 Chippewa Ct. - on Hwy 55, west of Mohawk 26 sq. ft.
Holiday Gas Stations 200 Highway 55 or 1300 Baker Park Road 24 sq. ft.
Sharepoint Credit Union Highway 55/Sioux Drive 24 sq. ft.
Staff believes an increased allowance for dynamic displays along roadways with higher speeds
does seem appropriate. Staff had originally contemplated 48 sq. ft., but the applicant is
advocating for a larger allowance.
The following information was collected from regulations from nearby communities.
MPH 30 35 40 45 50 55+
Maximum Dynamic Display Area
(In Square Feet) 32 36 40 45 50 55
Ditter Cooling, Heating and Electric Page 3 of 5 October 19, 2021
Sign Ordinance Amendment City Council Meeting
Dynamic
Area
Total Sign
Area Max Height Timing
Plymouth 64 sq. ft. 100 sq. ft. 36 feet 15 minutes
Maple Grove 50% 80 sq. ft. 15 feet 1 minute
Corcoran 60% 64 sq. ft. 16 feet 6 seconds
Chanhassen 40% 80 sq. ft. 20 feet N/A
Eden Prairie 35% 80 sq. ft. 20 feet 20 minutes
Shakopee 32 sq. ft. 120 sq. ft.
40 feet along 169;
height of building 8 seconds
Rogers 25% 100 sq. ft. 15 feet 60 minutes
Delano 100% 100 sq. ft. 30 feet 3 seconds
Woodbury 100% 80 sq. ft. 20 feet 24 hours
Current Medina
50% or 32
s.f. 80 sq. ft.
20 feet (10
dynamic) 1 minute
Proposed Up to 55 s.f. 80 sq. frt. 20 feet 30 seconds
The Planning Commission discussed the allowed dynamic display size at length. The consensus
of the Commission was that 55 square feet was too large, but that an increase seemed
appropriate. The Commission recommended increasing the maximum size from 32 square feet
to 80 square feet.
Dynamic Display Height
Current regulations state that “no portion of the Dynamic Display shall be located more than 10
feet from the ground…” This requirement generally requires a dynamic display to be located
lower than regular static signage may be permitted. It should be noted that there are exemptions
for alpha-numeric monochrome displays such as fuel prices and time/date.
The applicant proposes to remove this limitation. The proposed change is on page 15 of the
ordinance.
Staff has received other inquiries from property owners who desired to install dynamic displays
extending higher than 10 feet.
Staff does not oppose this proposed change. It appears most other communities did not have a
requirement that the dynamic display be lower.
The Planning Commission discussed and recommended increasing the maximum height of a
dynamic display to 15 feet. The Commission also recommended incorporating language into the
code that would account for a property which sits significantly lower in topography than the
adjacent roadway, allowing the height to be measured from the grade of the road.
Dynamic Display Message Timing
Current regulations state that: “A Dynamic Display must not change or move more often than
once every 60 seconds.” In addition, the ordinance requires:
“The images and messages displayed on a Dynamic Display must be static, and the
transition from one static display to another must be instantaneous and without
any special effects;
Ditter Cooling, Heating and Electric Page 4 of 5 October 19, 2021
Sign Ordinance Amendment City Council Meeting
The images and messages displayed on a Dynamic Display must be complete in
themselves, without continuation in content to the next image or message or to
any other Sign;”
These requirements are intended to reduce distraction.
The applicant proposes to reduce the timeframe for changing messages from 60 seconds to 30
seconds. Flashing, scrolling, and drag-on messages would continue to be prohibited. This
change can be found on page 15 of the ordinance.
Staff does not oppose this change. Decreasing the time would make it more likely that a
message will change as a driver is passing a sign, but with a 30-second timeframe, only one
change is likely for a moving vehicle. The timing in other communities is summarized in the
table on page 2.
The Planning Commission recommended leaving the allowed message timing at 60 seconds.
V-Signs
Current regulations state that, for a two-sided freestanding sign, only a single surface is counted
when measuring for maximum allowed sign area. The applicant proposes to add language
clarifying that “v-signs”, or a freestanding sign, where the surface is not exactly back-to-back,
should be treated similarly and only one surface should count. This change can be found on
page 3 of the ordinance.
The applicant states that V-Signs allow for better visibility for signs which are set further away
from a roadway. Staff does not oppose this change, and the Planning Commission agreed.
Residential Neighborhood Entry Signs
Current City regulations limit signs at the entrance to a neighborhood to six feet in height.
Monument signs are limited to 30 square feet.
The applicant’s sign consultant is recommending that these limitations be increased to allow
residential neighborhood signs to be eight feet in height, and for monument signs to be up to 32
square feet. These changes are on page 7 of the ordinance.
This change has no bearing on Ditter Heating, Cooling, and Electric, but was identified by the
applicant’s sign company as they reviewed the City regulations. The consultant noted that
drifting snow will tend to cover much of a sign if limited to six feet in height and that 32 square
feet size works better for standard sign materials.
Staff does not oppose these changes and the Planning Commission recommended approval.
Sign Brightness Correction
The applicant’s sign consultant also pointed out an error in the City’s lighting ordinance related
to sign lighting. The lighting ordinance currently reads that “Internally illuminated signs shall
not exceed 500 nits of luminance from sunrise until sunset and shall otherwise conform to the
provisions of this ordinance.”
Ditter Cooling, Heating and Electric Page 5 of 5 October 19, 2021
Sign Ordinance Amendment City Council Meeting
This language is backwards and should read: “Internally illuminated signs shall not exceed 500
nits of luminance from sunrise sunset until sunset sunrise and shall otherwise conform to the
provisions of this ordinance.” The intent of this language is to limit the brightness of signs at
night.
The proposed change is on page 20 of the ordinance. Staff supports making this change, as did
the Planning Commission.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The City has a high level of discretion when considering requests to amend its zoning regulations
because it is a legislative action. Staff believes that most of the changes seem reasonable and has
noted level of support behind each change.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the attached ordinance. The Commission
recommended the following changes from what the applicant had requested:
1) Increase dynamic display size to 40 square feet (down from the 55 s.f. required by
applicant along high-speed road)
2) Increase dynamic display height to 15 feet (rather than allowing at same height as static
signs as requested by applicant)
3) No decrease in the timing for changing messages on dynamic displays
Before staff incorporated the changes recommended by the Planning Commission into the
ordinance, staff wanted to present the applicant’s request to the City Council for consideration.
Potential Action
If the Council finds that the proposed changes are appropriate, with the changes noted by the
Planning Commission, the following action could be taken:
Move to direct staff to update the ordinance pertaining to signs as recommended by
the Planning Commission [with the following changes: _____________]
Attachments
1. Ordinance (unamended subsections to be removed upon adoption)
2. Excerpt from 9/14/2021 Planning Commission minutes
3. Excerpt from draft 10/12/2021 Planning Commission minutes
4. Supplemental information provided by applicant
****NOTE: ENTIRE SECTION IS PRESENTED FOR CONTEXT. Unamended sections will
be removed from ordinance upon adoption
CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO. ###
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO SIGNS;
AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE CITY CODE
The City Council of the City of Medina ordains as follows:
SECTION I. Section 815 of the code of ordinances of the City of Medina is amended by deleting
the struck through language and adding the underlined language as follows:
Section 815.01. Purpose. It is hereby declared by the city council that the aesthetic and safety
interests of the city are reasonably promoted by the provisions of this ordinance. Accordingly, it
is the intent and purpose of this ordinance to provide for the orderly and harmonious display of
signs within the city; to aid in the identification of properties and enterprises for the convenience
of the public; to avoid the erection of displays which produce deleterious and injurious effects to
adjacent properties and to the natural beauty of the environment; to provide for the safety of the
traveling public by limiting the distractions, hazards, and obstructions; to minimize visual clutter
and encourage a positive visual environment; and to promote the mental and physical health,
safety and welfare of the public. It is not the intent of this ordinance to regulate signage on the
basis of content.
815.03. Definitions. The following words and terms, wherever they occur in this ordinance, are
defined as follows:
Subd. 1. “Abandoned Sign” is a sign located on a property which is vacant and/or
unoccupied for a period of 90 days; or a sign which is damaged, in disrepair, or
vandalized and not repaired within 90 days.
Subd. 2. “Address Sign” is a sign which indicates the address, number and/or the name of
occupants of the premises. An Address Sign shall not exceed two square feet in area per
side for a residential single family property, eight square feet for a multi-family dwelling
building and 12 square feet for a commercial unit building, and shall not include any
other messages.
Subd. 3. “Billboard” is any structure or portion thereof on which lettered, figured, or
pictorial matter is displayed that has an area of 100 square feet or more.
Subd. 3.1. “Clear Vision Triangle” is the area to be left clear of signs and other
obstructions so as not to interfere with sightlines at intersections. The Clear Vision
Triangle is created by measuring 50 linear feet along the edge of each street or access
drive as depicted below.
Ordinance No.## 2
DATE
Subd. 4. “Directional Sign” is a sign which is erected for the purpose of guiding vehicles
and pedestrian traffic in finding locations on the property where the sign is located, such
as the shipping/receiving area, and is intended to be viewed from the right-of-way. The
Directional Sign shall be less than four square feet in surface area, consist of only two
surfaces and contain no illumination or additional messages.
Subd. 5. “Dynamic Display” is any characteristic of a Sign that appears to have movement
or that appears to change, caused by any method other than physically removing and
replacing the Sign or its components, whether the apparent movement or change is in the
display, the Sign structure itself, or any other component of the Sign. This includes a
display that incorporates a technology or method allowing the Sign face to change the
image without having to physically or mechanically replace the Sign face or its
components. This also includes any rotating, revolving, moving, flashing, blinking, or
animated display or structural element and any display that incorporates rotating panels,
LED lights manipulated through digital input, “digital ink” or any other method of
technology that allows the Sign face to present a series of images or displays.
Subd. 5.1. “Event Sign” is a Sign posted on a temporary basis meant to inform the public
of or guide the public to short term events such as garage/rummage sales or real estate
open houses.
Subd. 5.2. “Freestanding Sign” is a Monument Sign or Pylon Sign as defined herein.
Subd. 6. “Historic Sign” is a sign that memorializes an important historic place, event or
person and that is recognized by a governmental entity.
Subd. 7. “Illuminated Sign” is a sign which is illuminated by an artificial light source.
Subd. 8. “Incidental Sign” is a small sign, emblem or decal informing the public of goods,
facilities or services available on the premises (e.g. a credit card sign or a sign indicating
hours of business) and that does not exceed two square feet.
Subd. 8.1. “Internal Site Sign” is a sign which is not intended to be viewed from
neighboring property or the right-of-way and which does not exceed two square feet.
This include signs which guide internal site navigation and which identify handicap
parking areas, fire lanes, upland buffer zones, and similar site features.
Subd. 9. “Monument Sign” is a freestanding sign that is attached to the ground by means
of a freestanding support structure, solid from grade to the top of the sign structure and is
typically encased or supported by masonry materials.
Subd. 10. “Off-premises Sign” is a commercial speech sign which directs the attention of
the public to a business that is not on the same premises where such business sign is
located.
Ordinance No.## 3
DATE
Subd. 11. “Portable Sign” is a sign so designed as to be movable from one location to
another and which is not permanently attached to the ground or any structure, including
those on wheels. Portable Signs shall not include any flashing lights.
Subd. 12. “Projecting Sign” is a sign in which all or any part of it extends perpendicular to
and projects from a building face, wall or structure and which its primary purpose is other
than the support of the sign.
Subd. 13. “Pylon Sign” is a sign erected on a post or posts, or freestanding shafts, walls or
piers which is solidly affixed to the ground and not attached to a building.
Subd. 14. “Roof Sign” is a sign erected upon the roof of a structure to which it is affixed or
a sign painted on the roof of a structure. A sign located on a canopy, awning, or porch
shall not be considered a Roof Sign if the top of such sign does not exceed the height of
the adjacent wall of the structure to which the canopy, awning, or porch is attached.
Subd. 15. “Sign” is any letter, word, symbol, device, poster, picture, statuary, reading
matter, or representation in the nature of an advertisement, announcement, message, or
visual communication, whether painted, posted, printed, affixed, or constructed which is
displayed outdoors for informational or communicative purposes.
Subd. 16. “Sign Area” is that area within the marginal lines of the sign surface which
bears the announcement, name, advertisement or other message, or, in the case of letters,
figures, or symbols attached directly to any part of a building or wall, that area which is
included in the smallest rectangle which can be made to circumscribe all letters, the
figures, or symbols displayed thereon. For a two-sided freestanding sign, only a single
surface shall be counted when measuring the total and maximum Sign Area. Two-sided
signs may have a degree of separation at one end of the sign faces (a V-Sign
configuration). V-Signs beyond 45 degrees will be considered two signs.
Subd. 16.1. “Sign Surface Area” is the total surface area of a Sign, calculated by multiplying
the vertical width of the surface of the Sign times the horizontal height of the surface of
the Sign. Sign Surface Area shall not include the area of the post(s), shaft(s), or pier(s) on
which the Pylon Sign is erected.
Subd. 17. “Temporary Sign” is a sign which is erected or displayed for a limited period of
time, is not illuminated and not of a permanent nature, including banners, inflatable
devices or sandwich boards.
A
B C
D
Sign Area = A x B
Sign Surface Area = C x D
Ordinance No.## 4
DATE
Subd. 17.1. “Temporary Sign, Attached” is a Temporary Sign which is either attached to
a building or is located within the dimensional extent of an existing Freestanding Sign as
displayed below:
Image Credit: City of Minnetonka, MN City Code Subd. 18. “Vehicle Sign” is any sign that is attached, painted on or placed onto or inside a
parked vehicle that is used primarily for any purpose other than the sale or rental of the
vehicle itself. Vehicle Signs shall not include signs on trailers, buses, trucks, taxis or
other vehicles parked on the vehicle owner’s own premise while in the course of business
provided that the primary use of the vehicle is not for purposes outside of the premise’s
business.
Subd. 19. “Wall Sign” is a sign affixed to the exterior wall, awning or canopy of a building
or structure with the exposed face of the sign in a plane approximately parallel to the face
of said wall, not to project more than 12 inches from the surface to which it is attached.
Subd. 20. “Window Sign” is a sign that is affixed to or painted on the interior or exterior
of a window or glass door or otherwise displayed inside a building within three feet back
from the building’s window or glass door with its message intended to be visible from
rights-of-way or neighboring properties.
Subd. 21. “Zoning Administrator” is the officer or other person at the city charged with
the administration and enforcement of this ordinance, or his or her duly authorized
deputy.
815.05. Sign Permit Required; Exemptions; Prohibited Signs.
Subd. 1. Permit Required. It is unlawful to install, construct, erect, alter, revise,
reconstruct or relocate any Sign as defined in this ordinance in the city without first
obtaining a permit therefore as required by this ordinance, except as provided in
subdivision 2 of this Section.
Subd. 2. Exemptions. A Sign permit need not be obtained for the following Signs,
provided that all other applicable requirements of this ordinance are met:
(a) One Sign smaller than five square feet in area (excluding temporary signs) may be
posted on any parcel of land, except that such Sign may not be an Off-Premise
Sign;
(b) Signs posted by authorized government officials on public land or right-of-way;
(c) Signs within a business, office, mall or other enclosed area that cannot be seen from
the outside;
(d) Up to two Address Signs per property;
Ordinance No.## 5
DATE
(e) Incidental Signs;
(f) Flags. No flag on a flagpole shall exceed 40 square feet in area. No single property
shall fly more than three flags at one time. Flagpoles shall not exceed 40 feet in
height. If the total area of the flags exceeds 72 square feet, the excess area shall
be included in any Sign Area calculations for the property. Wall-mounted flags
shall be limited to one flag per property and shall not exceed 20 square feet in
area;
(g) Internal Site Signs
(h) Window Signs;
(i) Attached Temporary Signs posted consistent with Section 815.07 Subd. 3 below;
(j) Event Signs posted consistent with Section 815.07 Subd. 4 below; and
(k) Noncommercial speech signs exempted by Minnesota Statute 211B.045.
Subd. 3. Prohibited Signs. The following signs are prohibited in all zoning districts.
(a) Abandoned Signs;
(b) Billboards;
(c) Roof Signs;
(d) Mylar or metallic balloons displayed or flown outside;
(e) Vehicle Signs; and
(g) Signs posted within the public right-of-ways and public property, excluding
Directional Signs and Signs expressly allowed herein and by other governmental
agencies.
Section 815.07. Permitted Signs in all Zoning Districts. The following Signs are permitted in
all zoning districts.
Subd. 1. Signs on Construction Sites. Two Signs shall be permitted upon a construction
site in any zoning district. Each Sign shall not exceed 32 square feet in area per surface;
shall be limited to a single surface; shall be located upon the subject construction site;
shall be set back 10 feet from the right-of-way; and shall be removed upon completion of
the construction site improvements and release of the financial guarantee. No permit shall
be required for these signs if posted consistent with the requirements of this section.
Subd. 2. Temporary Signs and Portable Signs.
(a) Duration of permits. No Sign permit shall be issued by the city for a Temporary or
Portable Sign for a duration of more than 14 days at one time.
(b) Permits per year. Sign permits for a Temporary or Portable Sign shall not be issued
for more than six periods in any calendar year. Permit periods may run
consecutively without interruption if approved by the city.
(c) Number of signs per lot. Only one Temporary or Portable Sign shall be allowed on a
property at one time. In cases of properties with multiple tenants, one Temporary
Sign per tenant shall be allowed at one time, but only one Portable Sign shall be
allowed on a property at one time.
(d) Maximum size. Temporary and Portable Signs shall not exceed 32 square feet in
Sign Area.
Ordinance No.## 6
DATE
(e) Setbacks. Temporary and Portable Signs shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet
from all property lines and shall not be located within a Clear Vision Triangle of an
intersection.
(f) Illumination. Portable Signs may be illuminated, provided Freestanding Signs are
permitted to be illuminated in the zoning district in which the Portable Sign is
located and provided said illumination is not a nuisance to motorists or to adjoining
properties. Flashing lights, strobe lights, or lights which could be confused with an
emergency vehicle are prohibited.
(g) Inflatable Signs shall be considered Temporary Signs, shall not exceed the height of
the structure on the property, and shall be securely tethered and attached to the
ground or building.
(h) No Mylar or metallic balloons shall be permitted to be displayed or flown outside.
Subd. 3. Attached Temporary Signs
(a) No permit required. Attached Temporary Signs posted consistent with this section
shall not require a sign permit.
(b) Duration of posting. Attached Temporary Signs shall only be posted during the
timeframe when the message is pertinent.
(c) Maximum size. No Attached Temporary Sign shall exceed 32 square feet in Sign
Area.
(d) Location. Attached Temporary Signs shall be attached to a building or within the
dimensional extent of an existing Freestanding sign on the property as described in
Subd. 17.1 of Section 815.03 above.
Subd. 4. Event Signs.
(a) No permit required. Event Signs posted consistent with this section may be posted
without obtaining a sign permit.
(b) Duration of posting. Event Signs shall not be posted more than two days prior to an
event and shall be removed no more than one day following an event, but in no case
shall an Event Sign be posted for more than five days.
(c) Location. Event Signs may be posted within the right-of-way, but shall not be
located in a way which may interfere with traffic visibility or pedestrian circulation.
(d) Maximum size. Event Signs shall not exceed four square feet in Sign Area.
(e) Maximum height. Event Signs shall not exceed three feet in height.
(f) Required Information. The Event Sign shall state the day(s) of the event and also the
location of the event.
(g) Limit of one sign per intersection. No more than one Event Sign per event shall be
posted at a single intersection and no Event Sign shall be identical to another at a
single intersection.
(h) Responsibility for removal. The person posting the Event Sign shall ensure it is
removed within the timeframe described by this section. An Event Sign which
violates any provision of this ordinance may be removed and disposed of at any time
and without notice
Ordinance No.## 7
DATE
Section 815.09. Residential District Signs.
Subd. 1. General Provisions. In addition to the Signs allowed in Section 815.07, the
following Signs are permitted in Residential Districts. A Sign permit is required for each
Sign. No Sign in a Residential District shall exceed six eight feet in height. If
illuminated, the Sign shall meet the applicable luminary requirements set forth in Section
829 of the city’s ordinances.
Subd. 2. Permitted Signs. The following additional types of Signs are permitted in
Residential Districts:
(a) Directional Signs. One Directional Sign is permitted for each property;
(b) Monument Signs. Monument Signs are permitted at the entrances of a residential
subdivision, institutional use or park, but shall be no greater than 30 32 square
feet in Sign Area and be landscaped around the perimeter of the base of the Sign.
The landscaping shall cover at least two times the total area of the Monument
Sign base. The Monument Sign shall be set back at least 10 feet from the curb or
right-of-way;
(c) Home Occupation Signs. Home occupation Signs may be approved by the city
council in conjunction with a conditional use permit for the home occupation.
The home occupation Sign shall be no greater than eight square feet, have only
one side, be set back at least 10 feet from the right-of-way. The home occupation
Sign shall be landscaped around the perimeter of the base of the Sign. The
landscaping shall cover at least two times the total area of the home occupation
Sign base; and
(d) Pylon Signs. Pylon Signs are permitted at the entrance(s) of a residential
subdivision, institutional use or park, but shall not exceed 15 square feet in Sign
Area nor exceed 20 square feet in Sign Surface Area. The Pylon Sign shall be
landscaped around the perimeter of the base of the Sign. The landscaping shall
cover an area equivalent to the width of the sign surface multiplied by two. The
Pylon Sign shall be set back at least 10 feet from the curb or right-of-way. The
Pylon Sign shall be designed to have a natural appearance, and the post(s),
shaft(s) or pier(s) on which the sign is erected shall have a combined width which
is at least 10 percent of the width of the Sign.
Section 815.11. Commercial Highway (CH), Commercial Highway-Railroad (CH-RR), and
Business (B) District Signs.
Subd. 1. Permitted Signs. In addition to the Signs allowed in Section 815.07, the
following Signs are permitted in Commercial Highway (CH), Commercial Highway-
Railroad (CH-RR), and Business (B) Districts. All Signs shall be integrated with the
design and architecture of any buildings or structures on the property in terms of
materials, style, color and placement.
(a) Freestanding Signs.
(1) Maximum number. One freestanding sign is permitted per lot, except a second
Ordinance No.## 8
DATE
sign shall be permitted if the lot has frontage on more than one street. The
second freestanding sign may not be located along the same street frontage as
the first freestanding sign.
(2) Maximum size. No freestanding sign shall exceed 80 square feet of Sign Area.
(3) Maximum height. No freestanding sign shall exceed 20 feet in height.
(4) Setbacks. Freestanding Signs shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from all
property lines and shall not encroach within a Clear Vision Triangle of an
intersection.
(5) Landscaping, The Freestanding Sign shall be landscaped around the perimeter
of the base of the Sign. The landscaping shall cover at least two times the total
area of the Sign base.
(b) Wall Signs.
(1) Maximum size. The maximum total Sign Area of Wall Signs shall be based
upon the area of the wall on which they are attached as described in the table
below. Additionally, no individual Wall Sign shall exceed 200 square feet of
Sign Area. For the purposes of a multi-tenant building, the maximum Sign Area
for Wall Signs shall be based on the frontage of the space leased or owned.
Area of Wall Maximum Total Sign Area on Wall
1000 square feet or less 8% of the area of the wall
Greater than 1000 square feet and
less than 5000 square feet
80 square feet + 4% of the area of the
wall in excess of 1000 square feet
5000 square feet or greater 240 square feet + 2% of the area of
the wall in excess of 5000 square feet
(2) Projecting Signs prohibited. No Wall Sign shall extend more than 12 inches
from the surface of a building face, wall, or surface.
(c) Window Signs.
(1) Maximum number. Only one Window Sign shall be permitted per structure,
except for multi-tenant buildings where one Window Sign shall be permitted per
tenant space.
(2) Maximum size. The Window Sign shall be limited to 50 percent of the window
in which it is located.
(3) No permit required. No permit shall be required for a Window Sign, but such
Sign shall meet relevant requirements of this ordinance.
(d) Directional Signs.
(1) Directional Signs shall be only permitted for properties utilizing a drive-thru or
that have loading or staging areas.
(2) Maximum number. Two Directional Signs are permitted for each property.
(3) Location. The Directional Signs shall be set back at least five (5) feet from the
curb or right-of-way.
Subd. 2. Illumination. If the Sign is illuminated, it shall meet the applicable luminary
requirements set forth in Section 829 of the city’s ordinances.
Ordinance No.## 9
DATE
Section 815.13. Commercial General (CG), Business Park and Industrial Park District
Signs.
Subd. 1. Permitted Signs. In addition to the Signs allowed in Section 815.07, the
following Signs are permitted in Commercial General (CG) District. All Signs shall be
integrated with the design and architecture of any buildings or structures on the property
in terms of materials, style, color and placement.
(a) Freestanding Signs.
(1) Maximum number. One freestanding sign is permitted per lot, except a second
sign shall be permitted if the lot has frontage on more than one street. The
second freestanding sign may not be located along the same street frontage as
the first freestanding sign.
(2) Maximum size. No fFreestanding signs shall not exceed 64 square feet of Sign
Area except:
(a) signs along a frontage of principal arterial roadways shall not exceed 80
square feet,
(3) Maximum height. No freestanding signFreestanding signs shall not exceed 10 feet in
height from the adjacent roadway grade, except:.
(a) signs along a frontage of principal arterial roadways shall not exceed 20 feet
in height from the adjacent arterial roadway grade.
(4) Setbacks. Freestanding Signs shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from all
property lines and shall not encroach within a Clear Vision Triangle of an
intersection.
(5) Illumination. Freestanding Signs shall not be internally illuminated unless they
are located along the frontage of an arterial roadway and greater than 200 feet
from residential property. External illumination shall be downcast and
otherwise conform with Section 829 of the City Code.
(6) Landscaping. The Freestanding Sign shall be landscaped around the perimeter
of the base of the Sign. The landscaping shall cover at least two (2) times the
total area of the Sign base.
(b) Wall Signs.
(1) Maximum size. The maximum total Sign Area of Wall Signs shall be based
upon the area of the wall on which they are attached as described in the table
below. Additionally, no individual Wall Sign shall exceed 200 square feet of
Sign Area. For the purposes of a multi-tenant building, the maximum Sign Area
for Wall Signs shall be based on the frontage of the space leased or owned.
Area of Wall Maximum Total Sign Area on Wall
1000 square feet or less 8% of the area of the wall
Greater than 1000 square feet and
less than 5000 square feet
80 square feet + 4% of the area of the
wall in excess of 1000 square feet
5000 square feet or greater 240 square feet + 2% of the area of
the wall in excess of 5000 square feet
(2) Wall Signs limited to one wall per street frontage. Wall signs shall only be
located on one building wall, except lots with frontage on two or more streets
may have Wall Signs on one wall per street frontage.
(3) Projecting Signs prohibited. No Wall Sign shall extend more than 12 inches
Ordinance No.## 10
DATE
from the surface of a building face, wall, or surface.
(c) Window Signs.
(1) Maximum number. Only one Window Sign shall be permitted along each
frontage of a structure, except for multi-tenant buildings where one Window
Sign shall be permitted per tenant space.
(2) Maximum size. The Window Sign shall be limited to 50 percent of the window
in which it is located.
(3) No permit required. No permit shall be required for a Window Sign, but such
Sign shall meet relevant requirements of this ordinance.
(d) Directional Signs.
(1) Directional Signs shall be only permitted for properties utilizing a drive-thru or
that have loading or staging areas.
(2) Maximum number. Two Directional Signs are permitted for each property.
(3) Location. The Directional Signs shall be set back at least five feet from the curb
or right-of-way.
Subd. 2. Illumination. If the Sign is illuminated, it shall meet the applicable luminary
requirements set forth in Section 829 of the city’s ordinances. Freestanding Signs shall
not be internally illuminated unless they are located along the frontage of an arterial
roadway and greater than 200 feet from residential property.
Section 815.15. Commercial Neighborhood (CN) District Signs.
Subd. 1. Permitted Signs. In addition to the Signs allowed in Section 815.07, the
following Signs are permitted in Commercial Neighborhood (CN) District. All Signs
shall be integrated with the design and architecture of any buildings or structures on the
property in terms of materials, style, color and placement.
(a) Freestanding Signs.
(1) Maximum number. One freestanding sign is permitted per lot, except a second
sign shall be permitted if the lot has frontage on more than one street.
(2) Maximum size. No freestanding sign shall exceed 40 square feet of Sign Area.
(3) Maximum height. No freestanding sign shall exceed 10 feet in height.
(4) Setbacks. Freestanding Signs shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from all
property lines and shall not encroach within a Clear Vision Triangle of an
intersection.
(5) Illumination. Freestanding Signs shall not be internally illuminated unless they
are located along the frontage of an arterial roadway and greater than 200 feet
from residential property. External illumination shall be downcast and
otherwise conform with Section 829 of the City Code.
(6) Landscaping. The Freestanding Sign shall be landscaped around the perimeter
of the base of the Sign. The landscaping shall cover at least two (2) times the
total area of the Sign base.
(b) Wall Signs.
(1) Maximum size. The total Sign Area of Wall Signs shall not exceed eight
percent of the area of the wall to which they are attached. For the purposes of a
Ordinance No.## 11
DATE
multi-tenant building, the maximum Sign Area for Wall Signs shall be based on
the frontage of the space leased or owned. Additionally, no individual Wall
Sign shall exceed 64 square feet of Sign Area.
(2) Wall Signs limited to one wall per street frontage. Wall signs shall only be
located on one building wall, except lots with frontage on two or more streets
may have Wall Signs on one wall per street frontage
(3) Projecting Signs prohibited. No Wall Sign shall extend more than 12 inches
from the surface of a building face, wall, or surface.
(c) Window Signs.
(1) Maximum number. Only one Window Sign shall be permitted along each
frontage of a structure, except for multi-tenant buildings where one Window
Sign shall be permitted per tenant space.
(2) Maximum size. The Window Sign shall be limited to 50 percent of the window
in which it is located.
(3) No permit required. No permit shall be required for a Window Sign, but such
Sign shall meet relevant requirements of this ordinance.
(d) Directional Signs.
(1) Directional Signs shall be only permitted for properties utilizing a drive-thru or
that have loading or staging areas.
(2) Maximum number. Two Directional Signs are permitted for each property.
(3) Location. The Directional Signs shall be set back at least five (5) feet from the
curb or right-of-way.
Subd. 2. Illumination. If the Sign is illuminated, it shall meet the applicable luminary
requirements set forth in Section 829 of the city’s ordinances. Freestanding Signs shall
not be internally illuminated unless they are located along the frontage of an arterial
roadway and greater than 200 feet from residential property.
Section 815.16. Mixed Use District Signs.
Signs within the Mixed Use zoning district shall be regulated based on the land use of the
property on which they are located. Signs which are part of Commercial development within the
Mixed Use district shall meet the requirements of the Commercial Highway zoning district.
Signs which are part of Residential development within the Mixed Use district shall meet the
requirements of Residential districts.
Section 815.17. Uptown Hamel (UH-1 and UH-2) District Signs.
Subd. 1. Permitted Signs. In addition to the Signs allowed in Section 815.07, the
following Signs are permitted in Uptown Hamel-1 and Uptown Hamel-2 Districts. All
Signs shall be integrated with the design and architecture of any buildings or structures
on the property in terms of materials, style, color and placement.
(a) Monument Signs.
(1) Maximum number. One Monument Sign is permitted per lot.
(2) Maximum size. No Monument Sign shall exceed 40 square feet of Sign Area.
(3) Maximum height. No Monument Sign shall exceed 10 feet in height.
Ordinance No.## 12
DATE
(4) Setbacks. Monument Signs shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from all
property lines and shall not encroach within a Clear Vision Triangle of an
intersection.
(5) Limitation on internal illumination. Monument Signs shall not be internally
illuminated unless they are located along the frontage of a state highway.
External illumination shall conform with Section 829 of the City Code.
(5) Landscaping, The Monument Sign shall be landscaped around the perimeter of
the base of the Sign. The landscaping shall cover at least two times the total
area of the Sign base.
(b) Wall Signs.
(1) Maximum size. The total Sign Area of Wall Signs shall not exceed eight
percent of the area of the wall to which they are attached. For the purposes of a
multi-tenant building, the maximum Sign Area for Wall Signs shall be based on
the frontage of the space leased or owned. Additionally, no individual Wall
Sign shall exceed 64 square feet of Sign Area.
(2) Wall Signs limited to one wall per street frontage. Wall signs shall only be
located on one building wall, except lots with frontage on two or more streets
may have Wall Signs on one wall per street frontage
(3) Clearance; Projecting Signs prohibited. If the Wall Sign extends more than six
inches back from the building face, wall or surface, the Sign shall provide a
height clearance underneath it of at least seven and one-half feet. No Wall Sign
shall extend any more than 12 inches back from the surface of a building face,
wall or surface.
(c) Window Signs.
(1) Maximum number. Only one Window Sign shall be permitted along each
frontage of a structure, except for multi-tenant buildings where one Window
Sign shall be permitted per tenant space.
(2) Maximum size. The Window Sign shall be limited to 50 percent of the window
in which it is located.
(3) No permit required. No permit shall be required for a Window Sign, but such
Sign shall meet relevant requirements of this ordinance.
(d) Directional Signs.
(1) Directional Signs shall be only permitted for properties utilizing a drive-thru or
that have loading or staging areas.
(2) Maximum number. Two Directional Signs are permitted for each property.
(3) Location. The Directional Signs shall be set back at least five feet from the curb
or right-of-way.
(e) Historic Signs. Historic Signs shall not be counted in the total Sign Area for the
property if the Historic Sign is less than five square feet in Sign Area.
(f) Porch Signs. No more than one porch Sign shall be permitted for each property.
Porch signs shall include signs within or on overhangs, canopies or arcades. All
Ordinance No.## 13
DATE
porch Signs larger than two square feet in Sign Area shall be located on the
outside portion of the porch.
Subd. 2. Illumination. If the Sign is illuminated, it shall meet the applicable luminary
requirements set forth in Section 829 of the city’s ordinances. Freestanding Signs shall
not be internally illuminated unless they are located along the frontage of a state
highway.
Section 815.19. Public/Semi-Public and Rural Public/Semi-Public Districts Signs.
Subd. 1. General Provisions. In addition to the Signs allowed in Section 815.07, the
following Signs are permitted in Public/Semi-Public and Rural Public/Semi-Public
Districts. A Sign permit is required for each Sign. All Signs shall be integrated with the
design and architecture of any buildings or structures on the property in terms of
materials, style, color, and placement. If the Sign is illuminated, it shall meet the
applicable luminary requirements set forth in Section 829 of the city’s ordinances.
Subd. 2. Permitted Signs. The following additional types of Signs are permitted in
Public/Semi-Public and Rural Public/Semi-Public Districts:
(a) Monument Signs.
(1) Maximum number. One Monument Sign is permitted per lot.
(2) Maximum size. No Monument Sign shall exceed 50 square feet of Sign Area.
(3) Maximum height. No Monument Sign shall exceed 10 feet in height.
(4) Setbacks. Monument Signs shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from all
property lines and shall not encroach within a Clear Vision Triangle of an
intersection.
(5) Limitation on internal illumination. Monument Signs shall not be internally
illuminated unless they are located along the frontage of a state highway.
External illumination shall conform with Section 829 of the City Code.
(6) Landscaping, The Monument Sign shall be landscaped around the perimeter of
the base of the Sign. The landscaping shall cover at least two times the total
area of the Sign base.
(b) Pylon Signs. No Pylon Sign shall be greater than 15 square feet in Sign Area nor
exceed 20 square feet in Sign Surface Area. No Pylon Sign shall exceed eight
feet in height. The Pylon Sign shall be landscaped around the perimeter of the
base of the Sign. The landscaping shall cover an area equivalent to the width of
the sign surface multiplied by two. A Pylon Sign shall be set back at least 20 feet
from all lot lines of the property, with the exception that the Sign may be set back
only 10 feet from the front lot line of the property if it is located at least 25 feet
from the side lot lines. The Pylon Sign shall be designed to have a natural
appearance, and the post(s), shaft(s) or pier(s) on which the sign is erected shall
have a combined width which is at least 10 percent of the width of the Sign.
(c) Wall Signs.
(1) Maximum size. The total Sign Area of Wall Signs shall not exceed eight
percent of the area of the wall to which they are attached. For the purposes of a
multi-tenant building, the maximum Sign Area for Wall Signs shall be based on
Ordinance No.## 14
DATE
the frontage of the space leased or owned. Additionally, no individual Wall
Sign shall exceed 64 square feet of Sign Area.
(2) Wall Signs limited to one wall per street frontage. Wall signs shall only be
located on one building wall, except lots with frontage on two or more streets
may have Wall Signs on one wall per street frontage.
Section 815.21. General Sign Location, Design and Construction Requirements.
Subd. 1. General Requirements. All Signs shall conform to the requirements of this
Section whether or not a Sign permit is required. All Signs shall be constructed in such a
manner and of such material that they shall be safe and substantial. All Signs shall be
properly secured, supported and braced and shall be kept in good repair so that public
safety and traffic safety are not compromised. Signs visible from a street shall be
designed to be highly legible so as not to distract drivers. Attention should be paid to font
type, font size, and contrasts between the message and background.
Subd. 2. Maintenance. The area on the property around the Sign, including required
landscaping areas, shall be properly maintained and clear of brush, weeds, debris, rubbish
and other obstacles. All burned-out light bulbs or damaged panels on a Sign shall be
immediately replaced.
Subd. 3. Sign Copy. All Sign copy shall be fastened securely to the Sign face and
maintained on a regular basis. Any missing Sign copy shall be replaced immediately.
Any Sign copy that is outdated must be removed within 30 days.
Subd. 4. Location. No Sign shall be located so as to obscure any existing Sign. No sign
other than a governmental sign shall be erected or temporarily placed within any street
right-of-way or upon any public easement, except as explicitly permitted herein. No Sign
shall be attached or placed upon any building in such a manner as to obstruct any window
or door or fire escape or be attached to any fire escape. The minimum clearance of any
Sign from unprotected electrical conductors shall be not less than 36 inches for
conductors carrying not over 600 volts and 48 inches for conductors carrying more than
600 volts.
Subd. 5. Coordinated Site Signage. Sign Area for Freestanding Signs may be
transferred from one lot to another lot subject to the following conditions:
(a) The maximum aggregate Sign Area of Freestanding Signs shall not be increased.
(b) The maximum number of Freestanding Signs allowed on each lot shall not be
increased.
(c) Sign Area shall not be transferred to or from residential lots.
(d) A Freestanding Sign on a lot to which Sign Area is transferred may exceed the
allowed maximum Sign Area but shall not exceed 200% of the allowed Sign Area.
(e) The allowed Sign Area for Freestanding Sign(s) on a lot from which the Sign Area is
transferred shall be reduced by an equal amount.
(f) No more than 50% of the maximum Sign Area may be transferred to another lot.
(g) The lot to which Sign Area is transferred shall be located within 1000 feet of the lot
from which Sign Area is transferred or be within the same development.
Ordinance No.## 15
DATE
(h) No Sign Area may be transferred between or among lots except pursuant to an
agreement among the property owners in a form and substance acceptable to the City.
The agreement shall be recorded against the lots, document the reduction of Sign Area
allowed on the lot from which the Sign Area was transferred, and describe maintenance
obligations.
Subd. 6. Interference with Traffic. A Sign shall not be located within 50 feet of any
street, traffic sign or signal, intersection, driveway or crosswalk. A Sign may be located
closer than 50 feet if it can be shown that the Sign will not interfere with the ability of
drivers and pedestrians to see the traffic sign or signal, intersection, driveway or
crosswalk, and the Sign will not distract drivers nor cause any interference with such
traffic sign or signal.
Subd. 7. Illumination. Illuminated signs shall be subject to the electrical requirements of
the electrical code of the State of Minnesota. Illuminated signs shall also be subject to
the requirements of Section 829 of the city’s ordinances.
Subd. 8. Dynamic Displays. Dynamic Displays on Signs are allowed subject to the
following conditions:
(a) RESERVED.
(b) No more than one contiguous Dynamic Display shall be located upon a single parcel,
except as described in clause (e) below. A two-sided Dynamic Display shall be
considered a single Dynamic Display for the purposes of this section.
(c) No Maximum Dynamic Display may exceed 32 square feet in area on a single Sign
face and shall not occupy more than 50 percent of the actual copy and graphic
area of the Sign face.be determined by the speed limit of the adjacent road shown
on the chart below:
MPH 30 35 40 45 50 55+
Maximum Dynamic Display Area
(In Square Feet) 32 36 40 45 50 55
(d) No portion of the Dynamic Display shall be located more than 10 feet from the
ground, except as described in clause (e) below
(e) Notwithstanding the limitations in clause (b), (c), and (d), an additional alpha-
numeric, monochrome Dynamic Display element may be included on a Sign face
provided that it can display no more than four characters and is no more than 16
square feet in area. This Dynamic Display element may be located higher than 10
feet above the ground.
(f) A Dynamic Display must not change or move more often than once every 60 30
seconds;
Ordinance No.## 16
DATE
(g) The images and messages displayed on a Dynamic Display must be static, and the
transition from one static display to another must be instantaneous and without
any special effects;
(h) The images and messages displayed on a Dynamic Display must be complete in
themselves, without continuation in content to the next image or message or to
any other Sign;
(i) Every line of copy and graphics on a Dynamic Sign visible from a road must be at
least seven inches in height. If there is insufficient room for copy and graphics
meeting these requirements, then no Dynamic Display is permitted;
(j) Dynamic Displays must be designed and equipped to freeze the device in one
position if a malfunction occurs. The display must also be equipped with a means
to immediately discontinue the display if it malfunctions, and the Sign owner
must immediately stop the Dynamic Display when notified by the city that it is
not complying with the standards of this ordinance;
(k) Dynamic Display Brightness Standards.
(2) In no case shall the luminance from a Dynamic Display exceed 500
NITS between sunset and sunrise and 5,000 NITS between sunrise
and sunset.
(3) All signs with Dynamic Displays shall be equipped with an ambient
light sensor and an automatic dimmer control that automatically
controls the brightness to comply with these requirements.
(4) In addition to these requirements, all lighting on the property shall
abide by maximum illumination requirements at property line as
described in Section 829. However, Dynamic Displays which
meet the standards of this section shall be exempt from the light
output and shielding requirements of Section 829; and
(l) Dynamic Displays existing on the effective date of this ordinance that do not meet
the structural requirements or operational standards above may continue as a Non-
Conforming Sign subject to Section 815.29. An existing Dynamic Display that
cannot meet minimum font size requirements as stated in subdivision 8(i) above
must use the largest size possible for one line of copy to fit in the available space.
Ordinance No.## 17
DATE
Subd. 9. Brightness Standards.
(a) All Signs shall meet the applicable luminary requirements set forth in Section 829
of the city’s ordinances, unless otherwise exempted by this section.
(b) The person owning or controlling the Sign must adjust the Sign to meet the
brightness standards in accordance with the city’s instructions. The adjustment
must be made immediately upon notice of non-compliance from the city. The
person owning or controlling the Sign may appeal the city’s determination
through the appeal procedure as set forth in Section 815.27 of this code.
(c) All Signs installed after the effective date of this ordinance must be equipped with
a means to immediately turn off the display or lighting if it malfunctions, and the
Sign owner or operator must immediately turn off the Sign or lighting when
notified by the city that it is not complying with the standards of this section.
Subd. 10. RESERVED.
Subd. 11. Non-Commercial Speech Signs. The owner of any Sign which is otherwise
allowed by this ordinance may substitute non-commercial copy in lieu of any other
commercial or non-commercial copy. This substitution of copy may be made without
any additional approval or permitting by the city. The purpose of this provision is to
prevent any inadvertent favoring of commercial speech over non-commercial speech, or
favoring of any particular non-commercial message over any other non-commercial
message. This provision prevails over any other more specific provision to the contrary.
Section 815.23. Sign Permit Applications. The owner or occupant of the property on which a
Sign is to be erected, or the owner or installer of such Sign, shall file an application with the city
Zoning Administrator for a Sign permit. Sign permits must be acquired for all new, relocated,
modified, or redesigned Signs except those specifically excepted in this ordinance.
Subd. 1. Required Information. An application for a Sign permit shall include the
following information:
(a) The name, address and telephone number of the applicant;
(b) The legal description and address of the property to which the Sign is to be placed;
(c) A site plan complete with the description of the Sign, a scaled drawing showing the
Sign’s size, location, manner of construction, landscaping, color, construction
materials and lighting details;
(d) A blueprint or ink drawing of the plans and specifications and the method of
construction and attachment of the Sign;
Ordinance No.## 18
DATE
(e) A certified survey with the existing and proposed grading of the site location for
which the Sign will be placed if the Sign construction will disturb more than 50
cubic yards of earth. The certified survey shall show the existing and proposed
site elevations in two foot contours, drainage patterns and silt fence location for
erosion control for the proposed site;
(f) The name of the person or entity erecting the Sign, if not the applicant, or the name
of the person on whose property the Sign is to be located, if not the applicant;
(g) The written consent of the owner of the property, if not the applicant;
(h) A statement as to whether the Sign will be illuminated or not;
(i) A statement as to whether the Sign will contain any type of Dynamic Display;
(j) A statement as to whether the Sign will be single faced, double-faced or multi-faced;
and
(k) Such other information as shall be required by the Building Official and/or the
Zoning Administrator.
Subd. 2. Permit Fees. The application for a Sign permit shall be accompanied by the
required Sign permit fee and any applicable building permit fee. The Sign permit and
building permit fees shall be established by ordinance of the city council.
Subd. 3. Master Signage Plan. A master signage plan shall be included for any Sign
permit applications that involve any residential, mixed-use, commercial, business park
and industrial planned unit developments that include multiple structures and/or
substantial site area and/or mixed uses. The master signage plan must address the
visibility needs of the entire development area, while remaining consistent with the intent
of this ordinance to require high quality signage. The master signage plan shall also
include permanent Sign covenants which can be enforced by the city.
Subd. 4. Sign Permit Issuance/Denial. Provided that the Sign permit application is
complete and approved by the Zoning Administrator, all fees have been paid, and the
proposed Sign and the property upon which the Sign is to be placed are within the
requirements of the ordinance and all other ordinances, statutes and regulations, the
Zoning Administrator shall then issue the Sign permit. In the event that the Zoning
Administrator determines that all requirements for approval have not been met, he or she
shall promptly notify the applicant of such fact and shall automatically deny the Sign
permit. Notice shall be made in writing and sent to the applicant’s address listed on the
Sign permit application.
Subd. 5. Inspection. The Zoning Administrator or Building Official shall inspect the
property for which a Sign permit is issued on or before six months from the date of
issuance of the Sign permit. If the Sign construction is not substantially complete within
Ordinance No.## 19
DATE
six months from the date of issuance, the Sign permit shall be revoked. If the
construction is substantially complete, but not in full compliance with this ordinance,
other ordinances and applicable codes, the Zoning Administrator shall give the applicant
notice of the deficiencies and shall allow an additional 30 days from the date of the
inspection for the deficiencies to be corrected. If the deficiencies are not corrected by
such date, the Sign permit shall be revoked.
Subd. 6. Sign Permit Expiration. A Sign permit shall become null and void if the Sign
for which the Sign permit was issued has not been completed and installed within six
months after the date of issuance. No refunds shall be made for permit fees paid for Sign
permits that expired due to failure to erect a permitted Sign. If later an individual decides
to erect a Sign at the same location, a new Sign permit application must be processed and
another permit fee shall be paid in accordance with the fee schedule applicable at such
time.
Subd. 7. Revocation. Should it be determined by the city that a Sign permit was issued
pursuant to an incomplete application or an application containing a false material
statement, or that the Sign permit has been erroneously issued in violation of this
ordinance, the Zoning Administrator shall revoke the Sign permit.
Section 815.25. Enforcement.
Subd. 1. Notice. Any person who violates any provision of this ordinance shall receive a
notice of the violation by hand delivery or mail indicating that he or she must correct the
violation within seven days of the date of the notice. Signs posted within the right-of-way
or on public property which violate any provision of this ordinance may be removed and
disposed of at any time and without notice.
Subd. 2. Penalties. Any person convicted of violating this ordinance shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine or imprisonment as specified by state statute.
Each day in which the violation continues to occur shall constitute a separate offense.
Violation of any provision of this ordinance shall also be grounds for revocation of a Sign
permit by the city.
Section 815.27. Appeal. An applicant whose Sign permit has been denied or a permitee whose
Sign permit has been revoked may appeal the decision of the Zoning Administrator to the city
council provided he or she files written notice of an appeal with the Zoning Administrator within
15 business days of notice of the Zoning Administrator’s decision. Such appeal shall be
considered by the city council at its next regularly scheduled meeting held after the city’s receipt
of the written notice of appeal, provided that the notice of appeal is received by the city a
minimum of five full business days before the meeting. The city council shall conduct an appeal
hearing and allow the applicant and any of his or her witnesses to address the council and to
submit additional information. The city council shall make its final determination on the appeal
no more than 30 business days after the appeal hearing. The city council shall notify the
applicant of its decision and provide reasons for that decision.
Section 815.29. Nonconforming Signs. Any Sign legally existing at the time of the passage of
this ordinance that does not conform to the provisions of this ordinance shall be regulated by
Ordinance No.## 20
DATE
relevant City Code and statutory provisions regarding nonconformities.
Section 815.31 Variances. Variances from the provisions of this ordinance shall be reviewed
by the provisions of the City Code related to zoning variances.
Section 815.33. Severability and Conflict. This ordinance and its parts are declared to be
severable. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, word, provision, or portion of this
ordinance is declared invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, this
decision shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole. All parts of this ordinance not
declared invalid or unconstitutional shall remain in full force and effect as if such portion so
declared or adjudged unconstitutional or invalid were not originally part of this section, even if
the surviving parts of the ordinance result in greater restrictions after any unconstitutional or
invalid provisions are stricken. The city council declares that it would have enacted the
remaining parts of the section if it had known that such portion thereof would be declared or
adjudged unconstitutional or invalid. If any part of this ordinance is found to be in conflict with
any other ordinance or with any part of this ordinance, the most restrictive or highest standard
shall prevail. If any part of this ordinance is explicitly prohibited by federal or state statute, that
part shall not be enforced.
SECTION II. Section 829.05 of the code of ordinances of the City of Medina is amended by
deleting the struck through language and adding the underlined language as follows:
Section 829.05. Lighting for Signs.
Subd. 1. External illumination for signs shall conform to all provisions of this ordinance. In
particular, such lighting shall conform to the lamp source, shielding restrictions and light
levels of Section 829.04. All upward-directed sign lighting is prohibited.
Subd. 2. Internally illuminated signs.
(a) Portions of a Sign which do not include a logo or message shall be opaque or, if
lighted, shall be constructed with a colored (not white, off-white, light gray, cream
or yellow) background.
(b) Internally illuminated signs shall not exceed 500 nits of luminance from sunrise
sunset until sunset sunrise and shall otherwise conform to the provisions of this
ordinance. Neon signs, Light Emitting Diode (LED) signs, and other similar
devices shall be treated as internally illuminated signs for the purposes of this
ordinance and shall conform to all provisions of this ordinance.
(c) Other internally-illuminated panels, bands or decorations not considered to be signs
according to the sign ordinance, such as illuminated canopy margins or building
faces and neon/LED banding, shall not exceed 500 nits of luminance from sunset
until sunrise and shall be subject to the standards applicable to such lighting,
including but not limited to the lamp source, shielding standards and light level
requirements of Section 829.04. Internally-illuminated panels, bands or other
decorative lighting shall not be permitted upon building facades, canopies, or
Ordinance No.## 21
DATE
around signs within 500 feet of residential property, as measured from the
proposed lighting location on the site to the property line of the residential
property.
Subd. 3. Curfews. Illumination for signs and glass enclosed areas, shall be turned off at 11
PM or when the business closes, whichever is later. Illumination for signs and glass
enclosed areas shall not be turned on until 5 AM or when the business opens, whichever is
later. Signs subject to curfews are required to have functioning and properly adjusted
automatic shut-off timers. Light background (white, off-white, light gray, cream or yellow)
internally illuminated signs, installed legally before enactment of this ordinance, shall be
considered non-conformities but may continue to be used and illuminated so long as their
use conforms to the curfews as indicated. Notwithstanding the above, signs with light
backgrounds must be brought into compliance with this ordinance within the time periods
specified in section 829.03, subd. 3 hereof.
Subd. 4. Internally illuminated signs are not permitted in E1 Lighting Zones.
SECTION III. This ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and publication.
Adopted by the Medina city council this _____day of ______, 2021.
______________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
___________________________________
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
Published in the Crow River News on the ____ day of ______, 2021.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 09/14/2021 Minutes
1
Public Hearing – Ordinance Amendment – Chapter 8 of the City Code Pertaining to
Sign Regulations – Requested by Ditter Heating, Cooling and Electric
Finke presented a request from a property owner to amend the zoning code specifically related to the sign
regulations. The property owned by the applicant is located at 820 Tower Drive. The applicant is
considering a dynamic sign for advertisement and as they were reviewing options, some of the regulations
caused concern related to the effectiveness of their potential sign because of the distance from Highway
55 and speed of traffic on the roadway. He stated that the first amendment is related to the size and height
allowances within the different zoning districts. The applicant proposed to add additional allowances for
height for properties adjacent to arterial roadways. He stated that staff does not oppose this change as it
would seem to make sense along the highway and would be similar to other commercial zoning district
properties. He asked if that should be opened to all arterial roadways or simply principle arterial
roadways. He stated that the second proposal is related to dynamic display signs, stating that currently
the City allows no more than 32 square feet in area and no more than 50 percent of the total sign. He
stated that the applicant would propose to increase the area for signs adjacent to roads with higher speeds
and would link the square footage allowed to the speed of the roadway; a 55-mph roadway would then
permit a 55 square foot area. He stated that most of the dynamic signs do not even reach the 32 square
feet, outside of the Medina Entertainment Center sign. He noted that the next amendment would relate to
the height of the sign, noting that the dynamic portion cannot exceed ten feet in height. He noted that the
applicant would propose to remove the height limitation and therefore the height would default to the
height allowed for a sign within the zoning district. He stated that there has been interest from other
property owners to have a dynamic display higher than ten feet as well. He noted that the next
amendment would be related to message timing and stated that the City currently specifies that the
message not change more than once per minute while the applicant would propose to allow messages to
change every 30 seconds. He stated that the applicant proposes to clarify that signs that are not exactly
back-to-back should be counted as a single face. He stated that the next change would be related to
neighborhood development signage, specifically the allowed height and square footage. He noted that
while that would not apply to the applicant’s property, it was suggested by the consultant for the applicant
that commonly works with signage. He stated that the next change is related to brightness, noting that an
error was noticed by the consultant related to NITS. He stated that the language within the code has the
sunset and sunrise words in the wrong order, which then allows much brighter displays than intended and
therefore staff supports the change. He stated that staff does not oppose most of the proposed changes but
would like more discussion on the dynamic display size and related to arterial roadways.
Nielsen opened the public hearing at 7:16 p.m.
No comments.
Nielsen closed the public hearing at 7:17 p.m.
Nielsen confirmed the consensus of the Commission to support the changes proposed for the V-shaped
signs and residential neighborhood signs. She asked if there is concern in making these changes
applicable to the commercial general and business park districts.
Galzki asked if there would be a way to open these allowances to properties that have frontage along
Highway 55 rather than opening it up to the zoning districts.
Nielsen asked if that would be achieved by using principal arterials rather than all arterials.
Galzki confirmed that could alleviate his issue.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 09/14/2021 Minutes
2
Finke explained that is how the increased allowance would be intended. He stated that the general rule
for the subject property would limit signage in the current manner on Tower Drive and the increased
allowance would only be allowed on the Highway 55 frontage.
Galzki commented that he would simply want to limit the possibility of opening this up to more
properties than desired and noted that perhaps that language would provide that limitation.
Finke estimated about 12 to 15 properties that would be allowed to follow the ordinance as proposed.
Nielsen asked whether the Commission favored arterial roads or principle arterial roads.
Rhem replied that he would lead towards restricting to principal arterial in order to minimize distraction
and follow the intent of the zoning ordinance.
Grajczyk agreed and believed those areas would be more appropriate for that type of signage.
Galzki agreed that the intent would be to ensure properties along principle arterial roads could utilize that
frontage for signage.
Nielsen stated that she would prefer to keep the message duration at 60 seconds.
Piper agreed.
Rhem stated that he could support either option.
Galzki stated that he also did not have a strong preference. He stated that depending on what the message
is, it could be helpful to be able to change the message more frequently.
Nielsen stated that she is not steadfast in her position but finds those signs distracting.
Grajczyk stated that there is a light near the subject property, therefore during rush hour times increased
messaging could be distracting for drivers.
Piper asked if changing the message duration to 30 seconds would increase income for those that install
signs.
Mike Kasbohm, Think Digital Signs, stated generally speaking, the more a company can change its
messaging, the more opportunity to has to get its messaging out. He stated that some businesses are able
to generate cooperative marketing dollars from their suppliers. He used the example of a business
advertising products it sells at its site. He stated that the sign installer sells only the sign and does not
make money off the messaging. He stated that the trend that he has seen in cities has been long message
duration because of the concern related to safety. He stated that the studies completed have shown that
done right, without video or moving graphics, the signs are not a distraction to drivers. He reviewed the
range in message duration allowed by other communities from six to eight seconds to one minute or
above.
Piper stated that as a driver she has noticed that her attention shifts to looking at the sign to notice when
the message will change.
Grajczyk used the example of multiple businesses within a corridor using digital signage and asked if that
creates problems for distraction of drivers.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 09/14/2021 Minutes
3
Kasbohm stated that typically that is regulated by the distance between properties and therefore not been
an issue. He stated that in a corridor with multiple signs, a vehicle moving at 70 mph is moving roughly
100 feet per second and therefore if passing a number of properties, they would only see one or two
messages from signs. He stated that typically eyes gravitate towards what can be read and recognized and
that is why they recommend clear concise messaging with appropriate size of text.
Nielsen asked the timing allowed in Plymouth.
Kasbohm stated that he does not have that information with him but would be happy to provide the City
with a list of the allowed times of surrounding cities.
Nielsen commented that she would also be concerned with distracting drivers close to the intersection.
She asked for input on the maximum size proposed.
Galzki stated that his only concern is whether the sign size should be dictated by speed or roadway type.
He stated that perhaps the size is dictated by principal arterial, minor arterial, and collector roadway.
Nielsen commented that she liked that concept.
Finke stated that the theory in the increased size is to increase visibility when traveling at higher speeds.
He believed that speed would be a more direct link but acknowledged that the concept proposed would be
more straightforward.
Galzki stated that perhaps the regulations of surrounding cities are reviewed in terms of size and message
duration.
Finke stated that Plymouth has a message duration of 15 minutes and 64 square feet in certain districts
and 32 square feet in other districts. He noted that staff could review regulations of other communities if
desired.
Galzki stated that he would find that information helpful. He stated that he did not have a huge problem
with the change in height but would not want to remove the limitation but allow a reasonable height.
Finke stated that the display portion would still be subject to the maximum sign height. He noted that
Medina tends to be more restrictive by and large compared to other communities. He agreed that in terms
of digital display signs, many communities adopted default language, and many have amended it as time
as gone by and more experience has been gained.
Motion by Piper, seconded by Rhem, to table the request to the next meeting requesting additional
information. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Popp and Sedabres)
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 10/12/2021 Minutes
1
Continued Public Hearing – Ordinance Amendment – Chapter 8 of the City Code Pertaining to
Sign Regulations – Requested by Ditter Heating, Cooling, and Electric – Proposed to Increase Size
and Height of Dynamic Displays and Signs in Certain Districts
Finke stated that the Commission considered this request at its September 14th meeting, tabling the item to
request additional information. He provided a summary of the changes proposed by the applicant and
discussed at the last meeting. He also provided information on what is allowed in other communities
related to dynamic display message signs. He noted that staff does not oppose most of the proposed
changes.
Mike Casbalm, representing the applicant, stated that there are a number of cities that he has worked with
recently that do not have regulations or allow up to 100 percent of the sign to be dynamic display. He
reviewed those examples within the metro area. He stated that the reference to a percentage of the sign
that is static versus dynamic was a reference to the past when technology was not as advanced.
Popp stated that in the last packet it was noted that about 12 to 15 properties would be eligible for the new
signage regulation and asked if that is correct.
Finke stated that the number is correct, but it pertains to the increase in sign area and height that would be
relevant. He stated that those properties are already eligible for dynamic displays and therefore the
regulation would only impact the allowed size and height of the signs.
Popp asked how many other properties would be impacted by the proposed adoption to increase the
signage area.
Finke stated that the 12 to 15 properties that he mentioned would be the only properties that would have
the change. He stated that the broader changes to dynamic displays would apply to all zoning districts.
Nielsen opened the public hearing at 8:23 p.m.
No comments made.
Nielsen closed the public hearing at 8:24 p.m.
Sedabres stated that he appreciates the additional work that staff has done to show what is allowed by
other communities. He stated that he does not have any major concerns but has some questions with the
overall impact to the community. He stated that he feels comfortable with what is proposed given what is
allowed in other communities and advancement in technology.
Rhem also thanked staff for gathering the additional information, as that allows him to feel confident
supporting the requests in full.
Popp stated that he can support four of the eight requests. He stated that he does struggle with the
remaining three requests. He stated that he finds the request of the specific applicant reasonable but fears
the impact to the overall impact citywide. He stated that dynamic displays are purposefully distracting
and changes the experience of visitors in the community. He stated that the proposed max signage is 70
percent larger than the next on the list, which is significant. He stated that Medina has never aspired to be
Maple Grove or Plymouth and has its own vision and goals that must be upheld. He was unsure that
increasing advertising increases the quality of life for the residents of Medina.
Piper stated that it would appear that this would be the largest sign in Medina and asked if that is correct.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 10/12/2021 Minutes
2
Finke confirmed that a sign similar in size to the Medina Entertainment Center sign would be allowed for
the properties along Highway 55 if this were approved.
Piper stated that she struggles that this would allow large signs along the corridor. She agreed that
Medina is not Plymouth or Maple Grove. She believed that the signs could be made smaller.
Finke stated that the current regulations allow dynamic display signs but limit the size to 32 square feet.
Grajczyk stated that staff did a great job, and this is a review of another unique situation in Medina. He
stated that at the previous meeting, there seemed to be an understanding that 50 square feet would not be
exceeded. He stated that they also discussed safety concerns with changing messages near a busy
intersection. He noted that this would also set a precedent for the future and open doors for other
businesses to have signs of this type. He stated that he is not opposed to the requests. He stated that he
wants to ensure that the messaging does not change too frequently, causing a distraction. He commented
that given the desired placement of the sign, he did not believe it would generate a huge distraction.
Nielsen stated that she struggles with this as she would support some increase but believed the proposal is
too large. She commented that Ditter has been a part of the community for many years and wanted to be
able to accommodate a portion of the request. She stated that she does not like the idea of messaging
changing too frequently and becoming a distraction. She stated that she would like to see something less
than what is proposed.
Finke stated that although Ditter is the applicant, the proposal would be a change to the ordinance that
would apply citywide. He stated that there are some aspects of the Ditter property, and those adjacent
along Highway 55, which are unique as they sit back further from the road because of the railroad. He
stated that if 50 or 55 square feet is too large, perhaps 40 square feet be allowed.
Nielsen stated that she likes that suggestion.
Grajczyk stated that he would also support that recommendation.
Rhem agreed as well.
Piper asked if the height of 20 feet would still be allowed, or whether ten feet should be allowed.
Nielsen commented that she would support 20 feet.
Rhem stated that he is comfortable with 20 feet as this would only apply to arterial roadways.
Finke stated that the issue with the principal arterial roadways pertains to the increase of the general area
and height allowed within the limited districts. He stated that if the Commission gets rid of the maximum
dynamic display height, that will apply more broadly and not just to principal arterial properties.
Piper asked if CR 19 is considered a principal arterial.
Finke replied that it is an arterial roadway but not a principal arterial roadway.
Sedabres asked the heights of the signs from Medina Entertainment Center and whether they exceed ten
feet.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 10/12/2021 Minutes
3
Finke replied that the Medina Entertainment Center is unique as the property sits under a retaining wall
significantly below the Highway 55 grade, therefore the property received a variance in order to align
signage with the Highway 55 grade rather than the grade at the base of the sign but did not believe the
dynamic display sign is much higher than ten feet above the road grade. He stated that the Highway 55
Rental sign is nonconforming and is most likely higher than ten feet.
Sedabres stated that he is comfortable with the sign size and would be open to a height of 15 feet rather
than 20 feet if that would make the Commission more comfortable.
Piper asked if height could be regulated by a formula of an allowance above the roadway, which would
accommodate properties that have a lower grade.
Finke stated that he believes that is partially the issue of Ditter; the grade change from Highway 55. He
stated that the City has had other folks interested in dynamic displays higher than ten feet that did not
have a grade issue.
Casbalm stated that many of the cities he works with allow for the measurement of height from the
roadway rather than the area where the sign will be placed to account for elevation changes.
Popp provided additional comments related to V shaped signs and the degree of angle.
Nielsen asked for input from Casbalm on the average degree for V shaped signs.
Casbalm stated that he does not have an average but generally speaking they attempt to avoid a situation
where both sides of the sign are seen at the same time. He stated that for those that regulate the degree,
the smallest allowed would be 20 degrees.
Finke clarified that the angle is measured between the sign areas.
Popp stated that this would then make sense.
Motion by Piper, seconded by Rhem, to recommend approve of the ordinance amendments as proposed
with the following changes: to allow for a 15-foot height above the roadway, a 60 second message
duration, and to allow up to 50 percent of the sign as dynamic display.
A roll call vote was performed:
Grajczyk aye
Piper aye
Popp aye
Rhem aye
Sedabres aye
Nielsen aye
Motion carries unanimously.
Finke stated that as long as staff can make the changes recommended in sufficient time, this item will
move forward to the Council at its meeting the following week.
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com1
Ditter Cooling & Heating
820 Tower Drive
Medina, MN 55340
Site Analysis
August –2021
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com2
Property: 820 Tower Drive, Medina, MN 55340
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com
Zoning District: (CG) Commercial-General
3
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com
Zoning District: (CG) Commercial-General
4
Section 815.13.Commercial General (CG), Business Park and Industrial
Park District Signs.
Subd. 1. Permitted Signs. In addition to the Signs allowed in Section 815.07,
the following Signs are permitted in Commercial General (CG) District. All
Signs shall be integrated with the design and architecture of any buildings or
structures on the property in terms of materials, style, color and placement.
(a) Freestanding Signs.
(1)Maximum number. One freestanding sign is permitted per lot, except a
second sign shall be permitted if the lot has frontage on more than one
street. The second freestanding sign may not be located along the same
street frontage as the first freestanding sign.
(2)Maximum size. No freestanding sign shall exceed 64 square feet of Sign
Area.
(3)Maximum height. No freestanding sign shall exceed 10 feet in height.
(4)Setbacks. Freestanding Signs shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet
from all property lines and shall not encroach within a Clear Vision
Triangle of an intersection.
(5)Limitation on internal illumination. Freestanding Signs shall not be
internally illuminated unless they are located along the frontage of a
state highway. External illumination shall conform with Section 829 of
the City Code.
(6)Landscaping, The Freestanding Sign shall be landscaped around the
perimeter of the base of the Sign. The landscaping shall cover at least
two (2) times the total area of the Sign base.
Section 815.11. Commercial Highway (CH), Commercial Highway-Railroad
(CH-RR), and Business (B) District Signs.
Subd. 1. Permitted Signs. In addition to the Signs allowed in Section 815.07,
the following Signs are permitted in Commercial Highway (CH), Commercial
Highway-Railroad (CH-RR), and Business (B) Districts. All Signs shall be
integrated with the design and architecture of any buildings or structures on the
property in terms of materials, style, color and placement.
(a) Freestanding Signs.
(1)Maximum number. One freestanding sign is permitted per lot, except a
second sign shall be permitted if the lot has frontage on more than one
street. The second freestanding sign may not be located along the same
street frontage as the first freestanding sign.
(2)Maximum size. No freestanding sign shall exceed 80 square feet of Sign
Area.
(3)Maximum height. No freestanding sign shall exceed 20 feet in height.
(4)Setbacks. Freestanding Signs shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet
from all property lines and shall not encroach within a Clear Vision
Triangle of an intersection.
(5)Landscaping, The Freestanding Sign shall be landscaped around the
perimeter of the base of the Sign. The landscaping shall cover at least
two times the total area of the Sign base.
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com
Zoning District: (CG) Commercial-General
5
Section 815.13.Commercial General (CG), Business Park and Industrial
Park District Signs.
Subd. 1. Permitted Signs. In addition to the Signs allowed in Section 815.07,
the following Signs are permitted in Commercial General (CG) District. All
Signs shall be integrated with the design and architecture of any buildings or
structures on the property in terms of materials, style, color and placement.
(a) Freestanding Signs.
(1)Maximum number. One freestanding sign is permitted per lot, except a
second sign shall be permitted if the lot has frontage on more than one
street. The second freestanding sign may not be located along the same
street frontage as the first freestanding sign.
(2)Maximum size. No freestanding sign shall exceed 64 square feet of Sign
Area.
(3)Maximum height. No freestanding sign shall exceed 10 feet in height.
(4)Setbacks. Freestanding Signs shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet
from all property lines and shall not encroach within a Clear Vision
Triangle of an intersection.
(5)Limitation on internal illumination. Freestanding Signs shall not be
internally illuminated unless they are located along the frontage of a
state highway. External illumination shall conform with Section 829 of
the City Code.
(6)Landscaping, The Freestanding Sign shall be landscaped around the
perimeter of the base of the Sign. The landscaping shall cover at least
two (2) times the total area of the Sign base.
Section 815.11. Commercial Highway (CH), Commercial Highway-Railroad
(CH-RR), and Business (B) District Signs.
Subd. 1. Permitted Signs. In addition to the Signs allowed in Section 815.07,
the following Signs are permitted in Commercial Highway (CH), Commercial
Highway-Railroad (CH-RR), and Business (B) Districts. All Signs shall be
integrated with the design and architecture of any buildings or structures on the
property in terms of materials, style, color and placement.
(a) Freestanding Signs.
(1)Maximum number. One freestanding sign is permitted per lot, except a
second sign shall be permitted if the lot has frontage on more than one
street. The second freestanding sign may not be located along the same
street frontage as the first freestanding sign.
(2)Maximum size. No freestanding sign shall exceed 80 square feet of Sign
Area.
(3)Maximum height. No freestanding sign shall exceed 20 feet in height.
(4)Setbacks. Freestanding Signs shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet
from all property lines and shall not encroach within a Clear Vision
Triangle of an intersection.
(5)Landscaping, The Freestanding Sign shall be landscaped around the
perimeter of the base of the Sign. The landscaping shall cover at least
two times the total area of the Sign base.
Subd. 8. Dynamic Displays. Dynamic Displays on Signs are allowed subject to the following conditions:
(a)Dynamic Displays are allowed only on Monument and Pylon Signs. No Dynamic Display shall be permitted on a parcel with less th an 400 feet of frontage upon a
public right-of-way. For the purpose of this requirement, the aggregate of all frontages shall be calculated, including frontage s on which the Dynamic Display is not
located.
(b)No more than one contiguous Dynamic Display shall be located upon a single parcel, except as described in clause (e) below. A two-sided Dynamic Display shall be
considered a single Dynamic Display for the purposes of this section.
(c)No Dynamic Display may exceed 32 square feet in area on a single Sign face and shall not occupy more than 50 percent of the actual copy and graphic area of the
Sign face.
(d)No portion of the Dynamic Display shall be located more than 10 feet from the ground, except as described in clause (e) below
(e)Notwithstanding the limitations in clause (b), (c), and (d), an additional alpha -numeric, monochrome Dynamic Display element may be included on a Sign face
provided that it can display no more than four characters and is no more than 16 square feet in area. This Dynamic Display element may be located higher than 10 feet
above the ground.
(f)A Dynamic Display must not change or move more often than once every 60 seconds;
(g)The images and messages displayed on a Dynamic Display must be static, and the transition from one static display to another must be instantaneous and without any
special effects;
(h)The images and messages displayed on a Dynamic Display must be complete in themselves, without continuation in content to the next image or message or to any
other Sign;
(i)Every line of copy and graphics on a Dynamic Sign visible from a road must be at least seven inches in height. If there is in sufficient room for copy and graphics
meeting these requirements, then no Dynamic Display is permitted;
(j)Dynamic Displays must be designed and equipped to freeze the device in one position if a malfunction occurs. The display must also be equipped with a means to
immediately discontinue the display if it malfunctions, and the Sign owner must immediately stop the Dynamic Display when not ified by the city that it is not
complying with the standards of this ordinance;
(k)Dynamic Display Brightness Standards.
(1)The illumination from a Dynamic Sign shall not exceed 0.3 footcandles above the ambient light level when measured at the closest of the following points: i) a
distance equal to_______________; or ii) the property line parallel with the sign face. The Dynamic Display shall be equipped so that it can be extinguished
immediately at any time during operation upon the request of the City to measure ambient light levels in order to verify comp liance.
(2)In no case shall the luminance from a Dynamic Display exceed 500 NITS between sunset and sunrise and 5,000 NITS between sunri se and sunset.
(3)All signs with Dynamic Displays shall be equipped with an ambient light sensor and an automatic dimmer control that automatic ally controls the brightness to
comply with these requirements.
(4)In addition to these requirements, all lighting on the property shall abide by maximum illumination requirements at property line as described in Section 829.
However, Dynamic Displays which meet the standards of this section shall be exempt from the light output and shielding requir ements of Section 829; and
(l)Dynamic Displays existing on the effective date of this ordinance that do not meet the structural requirements or operationa l standards above may continue as a Non-
Conforming Sign subject to Section 815.29. An existing Dynamic Display that cannot meet minimum font size requirements as sta ted in subdivision 8(i) above must
use the largest size possible for one line of copy to fit in the available space.
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com6
MN DOT Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic Count
Highway 55 19,900
Per Month:597,000
Per Year:7,263,500
Total Impressions Per Year:
(average 1.5 people/car)10.9M
Traffic and Impression Counts for:
Ditter Cooling & Heating: Highway 55
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com7
Sight Lines/Viewing Distances
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com8
Elevation Changes from Proposed Sign to Center of Eastbound lanes (5’)
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com9
Approximation –20’ High Overall, 8’x10’ V-Sign Heading West on 55
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com10
Approximation –20’ High Overall, 8’x10’ V-Sign Heading East on 55
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com11
Electronic Message Center –Sign Resolution
Minimum Recommended Viewing Distances
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com
Maximum Readable Distance
Readable For Maximum Letter
Distance Impact Height
100'30'3"
150'40'4"
200'60'6"
350'80'8"
400'90'9"
450'100'10"
525'120'12"
630'150'15"
750'180'18"
1000'240'24"
1250'300'30"
1500'360'36"
1750'420'42"
2000'480'48"
2250'540'54"
2500'600'60"
12
With letter height of 12” –15” you will be able to easily communicate to traffic on 55 with Impact. ~5-6 Seconds Travel Time (w/15” letters)
Good message design and contrasting colors will be essential for viewing and readability.
View Distances and Letter Size: 820 Tower Drive, Medina, MN 55340
MPH 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20
FPS 103 95 88 81 73 66 58.6 51 44 37 29
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com
Electronic Message Center
Resolution / Viewing Area Specifications
Cabinet Dimensions
Viewable Area
Dynamic Area
Area Containing LED Pixels
Pixel Pitch/Resolution
Distance between pixels
Red →Red
Blue →Blue
Green →Green
19mm, 16mm, (PT) 10mm, 8mm, 6mm (ST)
Smaller the number = higher resolution .
13
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com
Watchfire Modules –10mm & 16mm Comparison Each Module = 1’ x 1’ Square
14
10mm Surface (or Button) Technology (ST)16mm Push-Thru Technology (PT)
(with louvered screen removed)
900 Pixels Per Square Foot 324 Pixels Per Square Foot
FRONT
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com
Watchfire Modules –Back (All WF Outdoor Modules are 1’ x 1’ Squares)
15
Fully Encapsulated
(Front and Back)
With Silicon Gel
Automotive Grade
Power and
Communication
Connections.
Watchfire’s
“weatherproofing” is
second to none.
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com
19mm 16mm
10mm 8mm
6mm
16
Electronic Message Center –Sign Resolution
Images are an approximation
viewing from ~75’.
Zoom In to see
pixel pitch concentration.
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com
Watchfire Electronic Message Center
Easy to Use: Ignite Sign Design and Scheduling Software
17
Powerful and Easy to use
Windows PC-Based (Ignite) or
OPx Cloud-Based Internet Software.
OPx Cloud-Based Software Solution
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com
Watchfire Electronic Message Center
Sign Communications
18
4G Wireless Broadband Communication:
•Fast Secure Internet Connection to Sign
•Simplified Sign Management
•Easy Installation
•Sign Updates are Quick and Easy
•Mobile Updates
•Watchfire Runs Daily Remote Diagnostics
Communication Agreement for
the Life of the Sign Included.
Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com19
In order to help you and other important decision makers determine the appropriate sign size & resolution
and create enthusiasm for a new communication tool, we can arrange for a Watchfire demo truck visit.
Watchfire Demo Truck Visit
Swimming Pool-Utility Setback Page 1 of 2 October 19, 2021
Ordinance Amendment City Council Meeting
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: October 13, 2021
MEETING: October 19, 2021 City Council
SUBJECT: Ordinance Amendment – Swimming Pools, Utility Setback
Background
The City’s Swimming Pool ordinance (Section 800) currently requires:
“No pool shall be located within 18 feet (measured horizontally) from any underground or overhead
utility line of any kind.” A property owner recently contacted staff, attempting to install a
swimming pool at 1345 Elsinore Circle. An existing underground electric line is located along their
property line and serves their home from the rear rather than coming from the street.
Applying the 18’ setback from this utility line would result in essentially no practical location for a
pool to be located.
Staff consulted with Todd Geske, the City’s Building Official, and Dave Hucky, the state electrical
inspector who conducts inspections in Medina. Both acknowledged that the City’s zoning setback
from utilities is significantly larger than required by electrical or building code.
Electrical code permits underground electric lines to be much closer, depending on the type of wire
or conduit. Overhead wires are required to be 22.5’ from the pool deck (so could run over the pool
if located high enough).
In consultation with the Building and Electrical Inspectors, staff believed it was reasonable to
reduce the required setback for underground utilities and is recommending that the setback be
reduced to 5 feet for underground utilities.
It does not appear that a similar setback is common in requirements in other communities. Staff
reviewed a number of ordinances (Plymouth, Maple Grove, Orono, Victoria, Chanhassen) and a
general Google search and did not find a similar requirement beyond electrical code.
The attached ordinance would make this change. Staff is not recommending a reduction of the
setback for overhead utilities at this time.
Options
Make no changes
The 18-foot setback requirement ensures a large distance from a swimming pool to any utility
line. If the Planning Commission and City Council determine that this is preferred, the
ordinance could remain unchanged.
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item #9B
Swimming Pool-Utility Setback Page 2 of 2 October 19, 2021
Ordinance Amendment City Council Meeting
The property owner of 1345 Elsinore could consider a variance if the ordinance was not changed.
However, a variance can only be approved if consistent with the “purpose and intent” of the
ordinance. Staff believes it may be hard to argue that such a variance would be consistent. Staff
also believes that if the setback is overly conservative, the better path would be to amend it.
Remove Setback Requirement
The City could remove the zoning regulations pertaining to setbacks from utility lines. Relevant
electrical codes would still be required depending on the type of utility.
Staff does not recommend removing the setback requirement, because having some space
between the pool and the utility line seems in the interest of the property owner and utility
company. It makes it possible to expose the line if there were issues, and provides a bit of a
buffer to reduce impacts.
Same Setback from underground or overhead
The City could apply the same 5-foot (or other amount if deemed preferable by the Planning
Commission and Council) for both underground and overhead utilities. The 22.5-foot distance
from deck would still apply, but the 5-foot City setback would give a bit more space but not the
current 18 feet.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the ordinance at the October 12 meeting.
The owner who brought the issue to the City’s attention spoke in favor of the ordinance.
Planning Commissioners supported the reduction of the setback for underground utilities, but
generally supported maintaining a reduced setback. One Commissioner stated that they may
support a bit higher than 5 feet, but could go along with the proposed. The Commission
unanimously recommended approval.
Potential Action
If the City Council finds that the proposed changes are appropriate, the following actions could
be taken:
1. Move to adopt ordinance amending required swimming pool setbacks from utilities.
2. Move to adopt the resolution authorizing publication by title and summary
Attachments
1. Ordinance
2. Resolution for Title and Summary
3. Excerpt from DRAFT 10/12/2021 Planning Commission minutes
Ordinance No. ### 1
DATE
CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO. ###
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING REQUIRED SWIMMING POOL SETBACKS FROM
UTILITIES; AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE CITY CODE
The City Council of the City of Medina ordains as follows:
SECTION I. Section 800 of the code of ordinances of the City of Medina is amended by deleting
the struck through language and adding the underlined language as follows:
800. SWIMMING POOLS
Section 800.01. General Provisions. The purpose of this ordinance is to regulate the construction
and location of private swimming pools and to provide for certain safety features related thereto.
For the purposes of this ordinance, private swimming pools are defined as any enclosure, designed,
intended or used for the containment of water, whether constructed below ground level or above
ground level, having a surface area exceeding 100 square feet and a depth exceeding 18 inches
which is designed, intended, or used for swimming, wading, or other recreational use by the owner
or tenant of the property upon which the pool is constructed, or by the owner's or tenant's family or
invited guests without payment of a fee.
Section 800.03. Permit Required. No private swimming pool shall be constructed or established,
and no such pool construction shall be commenced without first obtaining a permit from the
building official.
Section 800.05. Application for Permit. Application for a swimming pool permit shall be made
to the building official upon forms provided by the building official. A fee set by ordinance shall be
submitted with the application to cover the costs of inspection. The application for the permit shall
include, without limitation, the following information:
Subd. 1. Complete plans and specifications for the construction of the pool, including a site
plan showing the location on the property of the proposed pool and surrounding deck or
patio and other improvements;
Subd. 2. A survey showing the location of all existing structures on the property, including the
house, garage, fences, trees, overhead or underground wiring, utility easements, and other
significant improvements or natural features;
Subd. 3. The location of proposed pumps, filters, electrical power source (if applicable),
flushing and drainage outlets, and other operational features;
Subd. 4. The location and specifications of the protective fencing or automatic pool cover; and
Ordinance No. ### 2
DATE
Subd. 5. Any other information necessary or convenient for review of the permit application
as determined by the building official.
Section 800.07. Application. The safety features, including electrical wiring and fencing or
protective pool cover as set forth in this Ordinance shall apply to all private swimming pools
constructed after July 17, 1979.
Section 800.09. Construction Set-back Requirements. Private swimming pools shall be
constructed so as to avoid damage to property and injury to the occupants of the subject property
and the occupants of adjacent property and shall meet the following minimum requirements:
Subd. 1. No pool shall be located within the following distances of utility lines and shall also
abide by relevant electric and building code provisions:
(a) Overhead utility lines: Swimming pools shall be located a minimum of 18 feet (measured
horizontally) from any underground or overhead utility line of any kind.
(a)(b) Underground utility lines: Swimming pools shall be located a minimum of five feet
(measured horizontally) from any underground utility mainline or service line, including
but not limited to electric, gas, telecommunication, fiber optic.
Subd. 2. No pool shall be located within any public or private easement intended for utility,
access or drainage purposes; any wetlands, floodplain or shorelands; or any other location in
which it might represent a threat to the natural environment; and
Subd. 3. Private swimming pools are accessory structures in all residential districts under the
zoning ordinance and must meet appropriate setback requirements.
Section 800.11. Safety Fence or Automatic Pool Cover Required.
Subd. 1. A safety fence meeting the following standards shall be required around all pools:
(a) Except as provided for in subd. 1(d), a safety fence at least 4 feet in height shall
completely enclose the pool. All openings or points of entry into the pool area shall
be equipped with self-closing gates or doors. All gates and doors shall have a self-
latching latch which is no less than 4 feet above the ground level and which shall be
constructed and placed so as to be inaccessible to small children. All gates and
doors shall be locked when the pool is not in use or is unattended by an adult with
demonstrated swimming ability. Any opening between the bottom of the fence and
the ground level shall not exceed 3 inches.
(b) Safety fences shall be constructed so as to inhibit the climbing thereof by any person. If
constructed primarily of wood, the fence shall be composed of vertical members
with spaces no greater than 4 inches between the boards. If constructed primarily of
other materials, the fence shall contain no spaces through which a sphere 4 inches or
more in diameter may pass.
(c) No wall of any pool constructed above ground level, regardless of the height thereof,
shall qualify as a safety fence.
Ordinance No. ### 3
DATE
(d) If the house or other structure provides all or a portion of one side of the pool enclosure,
all doors from the house or structure providing access to the pool area shall be
equipped with a pool alarm meeting the standards of F2208-02 of the American
Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM), as such standards may be modified,
superseded or replaced by ASTM.
Subd. 2. As an alternative to a safety fence, an automatic pool cover may be utilized if it
meets the standards of F1346-91 (Reapproved 1996) of ASTM, as such standards may be
modified, superseded or replaced by ASTM.
Section 800.13. Miscellaneous Requirements.
Subd. 1. The conduct of persons and the operation of pools shall be the responsibility of the
owner or the tenant of the subject property and such conduct of persons and operation of the
pool shall be done in such a manner so as to avoid any nuisance or breach of the peace.
Subd. 2. All back flushing or pool drainage water shall be directed onto the property on which
the pool is located or onto approved drainage ways. Drainage onto public streets or other
public drainage ways shall require a permit from the public works superintendent.
Subd. 3. Any outdoor lighting of the pool or pool area shall be designed and installed so that
the fixture is enclosed on all sides except the bottom and no light shall shine directly on any
other property or right-of-way.
Subd. 4. All electrical installations shall meet state requirements.
Subd. 5. Filling pools from fire hydrants or other public facilities shall be prohibited without
prior approval of the director of public works.
Section 800.15. Penalties. Any person violating this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
SECTION II. This ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and publication.
Adopted by the Medina city council this ____ day of ____, 2021.
______________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
___________________________________
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
Published in the Crow River News on the _______ day of ________, 2021.
Resolution No. 2021-##
DATE
Member ________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-##
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF
ORDINANCE NO. ### BY TITLE AND SUMMARY
WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an
ordinance amending required swimming pool setbacks from utilities; amending Chapter 8 of the
City Code; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statues § 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publications by title and
summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and
WHEREAS, the ordinance is three pages in length; and
WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform
the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina
that the city clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. ### to be published in the
official newspaper in lieu of the ordinance in its entirety:
Public Notice
The city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ##, an ordinance amending
required swimming pool setbacks from utilities. The ordinance reduced the required setback for
swimming pools from underground utility lines from 18 feet to five feet.
The full text of the ordinance is available from the city clerk at Medina city hall during regular
business hours.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina that the city
clerk keep a copy of the ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that she post
a full copy of the ordinance in a public place within the city.
Dated: .
______________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
Resolution No. 2021-## 2
DATE
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ________
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 10/12/2021 Minutes
1
Public Hearing – Ordinance Amendment – Chapter 8 of the City Code Pertaining to Required
Distance from Swimming Pools to Utility Lines
Finke reviewed the current regulation which requires an 18-foot setback from any overhead or
underground utility. He stated that they spoke with the Building Official who did not raise a concern with
a reduction, as there are minimum setbacks required by Code, but at a smaller distance. He noted that
electric codes would allow overhead lines to go directly over a pool as long as the lines are at least 22.5
feet above the pool. He noted that other communities do not require a similar setback to utility lines. He
noted that staff recommends a reduction from underground utilities to five feet.
Nielsen asked if a change to ten feet for the setback would allow the resident to put in a pool.
Finke stated that change would serve this particular applicant. He noted that there are instances where
there are five-foot setbacks and therefore it would not solve that situation if there were a utility along the
property line.
Nielsen stated that five feet seems close, especially in the case a line needs to be worked on.
Piper asked the depth of underground utilities.
Finke estimated 30 inches to four feet in depth.
Graham Brugger, applicant, stated that his property is unique as it is a corner lot and the utility on the
property is the main electric line for his property and multiple other properties and therefore runs across
his entire backyard. He stated that they were surprised to hear that the setback was 18 feet. He stated that
setback would be impossible because of the location of the electric line and gas line. He stated that a ten-
foot setback would be very close as the pool as planned is ten feet from the property line. He hoped that
this change would not only help his property but others that may want a pool in the future.
Finke stated that the property owner does have unique circumstances which makes it difficult, but when
there is a gas and electric service coming into common lots, it would create issues to have a setback of 18
feet. He stated that staff recommended the ordinance amendment in order to solve that issue rather than
directing the applicant towards a variance.
Rhem asked the setback required by building code.
Finke replied that the overhead lines have a setback of 22.5 feet from various aspects of the pool, but
underground lines do not have a setback requirement within the electrical code. He noted that closer
installation requires different materials to be used.
Nielsen opened the public hearing at 9:13 p.m.
No comments made.
Nielsen closed the public hearing at 9:13 p.m.
Popp commented that this is a reasonable change and would support the proposal.
Piper agreed with the comments of Popp.
Grajczyk was also in agreement and supported the request.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 10/12/2021 Minutes
2
Rhem also agreed.
Sedabres agreed that this change makes sense.
Nielsen stated that she is also in agreement, although hesitant about a distance of five feet, but can support
the request as proposed.
Motion by Rhem, seconded by Piper, to recommend approval of the ordinance amendment pertaining to
the distance from swimming pools to utility lines as recommended in the staff report.
A roll call vote was performed:
Grajczyk aye
Piper aye
Popp aye
Rhem aye
Sedabres aye
Nielsen aye
Motion carries unanimously.
Weston Woods of Medina Page 1 of 8 October 19, 2021
Final Plat City Council Meeting
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: October 14, 2021
MEETING: October 19, 2021 City Council
SUBJ: Mark of Excellence Homes – Weston Woods – Final Plat
N of Hwy 55 – E of Mohawk Drive
Background
On January 5, 2021, the City Council granted PUD General Plan of Development and
Preliminary Plat approval to Mark and Kathleen Smith for Weston Woods of Medina. The plat
proposed 76 twinhomes, 42 single-family lots, and 32 rowhome units and an outlot to be deeded
to the City to preserve a maple-basswood forest remnant.
On April 7, 2020, the City Council had previously granted conditional approval of a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Weston Woods. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment
approval was not to become effective until formally adopted by the City Council and the
developer had entered into a development agreement and provided financial guarantees for the
infrastructure improvements proposed with the development.
The applicant has now requested final plat approval for a significant portion of the project. The
applicant proposes to plat the area of the 32 rowhomes as an outlot for future development, and
proposes to plat and develop the remaining property as the first phase.
A copy of Ordinance 667, which establishes the Weston Woods of Medina PUD, is attached for
reference.
Final Plat Analysis
Consistency with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, zoning and subdivision regulations, and other
relevant policies was reviewed during review of the Preliminary Plat. The purpose of a final plat
review is to ensure that the final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat and to
ensure that all the conditions of approval have been met.
Consistency with Preliminary Plat
It appears that the proposed plat layout is substantially similar to the approved preliminary plat.
Preliminary Plat Conditions
Following is a list of conditions which were required upon preliminary approval. Staff has
summarized how each has or will be addressed in italics.
1) Approval of the PUD General Plan of Development and Preliminary Plat is contingent upon
adoption of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
The City Council granted conditional approval of the Comprehensive Plan on April 7, 2020,
subject to approval of a PUD and development agreement by the City. Staff has prepared a
resolution which would adopt the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, which is attached.
Agenda Item #9C
Weston Woods of Medina Page 2 of 8 October 19, 2021
Final Plat City Council Meeting
2) Approval is conditioned upon approval of a wetland replacement plan for proposed wetland
impacts.
The City Council approved the Wetland Replacement Plan on April 5, 2021. Implementation of
the required replacement is included as a requirement within the Development Agreement.
3) Approval is conditioned upon establishment of a base flood elevation.
The City completed flood analysis as part of the permitting for Chippewa Road. No floodplain
impacts are proposed for the construction within the development, and the impacts pertaining to
Chippewa Road will be mitigated with construction of the roadway as required by agency
permits.
4) The Applicants shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include
the conditions described below as well as other requirements of City ordinance or policy.
A draft Development Agreement is attached for City Council review and approval. Staff
recommends execution of the development agreement as a condition of approval.
5) The Applicants shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated 12/3/2020 except as
may be modified herein. Final plans shall be provided at the time of final plat and shall
address the comments of the City Engineer, Fire Marshal, Elm Creek Watershed, other
relevant staff and agencies and the conditions noted herein. Plans shall be subject to review
and approval by the City Engineer.
Construction plans have been submitted and are attached for reference. The City Engineer has
provided comments. Staff recommends a condition that the City Engineer’ comments be
addressed as a condition of approval.
6) The Applicants shall submit architectural guidelines for review and approval by the City at
the time of final plat application. The guidelines shall include, at a minimum, the following
improvements from the photos and illustrations provided with the general plan of
development, consistent with the direction of the City Council at the December 15, 2020
meeting, including:
a. Architectural features upon the rear façades of the rowhome buildings which face
streets, including modulation, accent materials and other elements.
b. Additional architectural elements on the front of the twinhome buildings including
modulation and differentiation of rooflines, decorative garage doors, shakes and other
accent material and other elements.
c. Partitions or other means of screening to provide privacy between ground level patio
areas of rowhome units.
The applicant has not submitted architectural guidelines for the rowhomes, since they are not
proposed to be constructed at this time. Staff recommends that the requirement that guidelines
meeting this condition be submitted at the time of final plat application for the townhome project.
The applicant has submitted Guidelines for the single-family and twinhomes in narrative form
and a design of the twinhome product (attached). The applicant is finalizing more formal design
guidelines for presentation prior to the meeting, and staff will route when available. The City
Council can discuss whether these guidelines are sufficient for the PUD.
Weston Woods of Medina Page 3 of 8 October 19, 2021
Final Plat City Council Meeting
7) A site plan review of each townhome building within the development site shall not be
required as described in Section 825.55 of City Code. However, each building shall be
subject to administrative review by City staff for consistency with the site plan which
accompanies the plat, architectural requirements established in the guidelines approved by
the City at the time of final plat review, relevant requirements of City Code, and the
conditions noted herein.
Staff recommends that this condition be included on the final plat resolution, and is more
relevant when the final plat is requested for the rowhome development.
8) The Applicants shall meet all requirements of the wetland protection ordinance, including
provision of easements, planting of vegetation and installation of signage.
Staff recommends that this condition be included on the final plat resolution, and it is addressed
in the draft development agreement.
9) The plat shall include private roads within separate outlots from surrounding common areas.
The private roads within the twinhome project are included within separate outlots. Staff
recommends a condition that all common areas be identified as outlots rather than Lots.
10) The plat shall provide drainage and utility easements over all utilities, stormwater
improvements, wetlands, and drainageways as recommended by the City Engineer. The plat
shall also provide easements along the perimeter of the lots and between buildings as
recommended by the City Engineer.
Staff recommends that this be included as a conditional of approval for the final plat. Staff
recommends perimeter easements along the property lines between twinhome buildings, which
are not shown on the draft plat.
11) Plans shall be updated to either relocate the access point from Chippewa Road to the
townhome area further east, or to remove the access point. If the access point is removed,
the trail connection between Chippewa Road and the townhome area shall be designed and
constructed as a secondary emergency access if determined necessary by Public Safety. The
specifications shall be reviewed and approved by City staff.
This condition pertains to the rowhome development and will be reviewed at the time of final plat
application for the phase.
12) The Applicants shall update plans to provide additional stormwater management if the City
determines that additional treatment can be provided within the development to offset
treatment for the eastern portion of Chippewa Road.
The plans were updated to provide as much stormwater treatment as practical to offset required
treatment for Chippewa Road. The applicant will also construct stormwater management at
various locations along Chippewa Road to provide the remaining required management.
13) The Property shall be subject to the City’s lawn and landscaping irrigation regulations. No
lawn or landscape irrigation systems shall be permitted to be connected to the City water
system. The Applicants shall provide a description of the proposed irrigation system at the
time of final plat application.
The applicant proposes to install an irrigation system using stormwater re-use, supplemented
with wells when water in the pond is insufficient. The applicant has submitted plans for review
Weston Woods of Medina Page 4 of 8 October 19, 2021
Final Plat City Council Meeting
and staff recommends a condition requiring that the comments of the City Engineer and Public
Works Director be addressed.
14) The Applicants shall provide documentation to show that the average buffers required for
each wetland have been provided.
The plans identified wetland buffers meeting the average and minimum widths required by the
Wetland Protection ordinance with the exception of one small portion of the upland buffer
adjacent to Lots 31-34, Block 7. This area is proposed to be 15 feet in width. The ordinance
allows for reductions in width provided all the following conditions are met:
(i) The Applicant implements practices which are superior at meeting the long term
purposes of the section than would be possible through strict adherence to the requirements
of this section;
(ii) The total area of the proposed Upland Buffer Zone exceeds that which would result if
the required minimum Upland Buffer Zone width was utilized around the entire Wetland;
and
(iii) The proposed Upland Buffer Zone width does not fall below 75 percent of the required
minimum Upland Buffer Zone width at any location around the entire Wetland.
The applicant proposes wider buffers in other locations and staff believes the reduction within
this small portion of wetland is appropriate
15) The Applicants shall update plans for Chippewa Road as directed by the City Engineer.
The applicant has provided plans for review by the City Engineer. Staff recommends that this
condition be included on the final plat resolution requiring the City Engineer’s comments to be
addressed.
16) The Applicants shall provide 3372 inches of replacement trees, unless the City determines a
reduction is appropriate at the time of review of the final plat application based upon
implementation of a natural resource management plan for the removal of pioneering trees
such as boxelders.
The applicant has submitted information requesting a reduction of replacement trees. See
additional information below.
17) The design of the townhome roadway shall be updated as necessary to improve emergency
vehicle circulation.
This condition is relevant to the rowhome development in the future.
18) Plans shall be updated to improve trail and pedestrian alignment as recommended by staff.
Staff recommends that a trail connection be provided along Hillside Drive to fill the gap between
the trail to the park and the trail to the rowhomes.
19) The Applicants shall convey the preserved wooded area to the City with a warranty deed.
Plans shall be updated to include signage or other means to clearly delineate the preserved
areas from private lots.
Staff recommends this is a condition of approval, and the Development Agreement requires
execution of the warranty deed.
Weston Woods of Medina Page 5 of 8 October 19, 2021
Final Plat City Council Meeting
20) The Applicants shall construct the following paved trails and provide easements over the
locations as recommended by City staff:
a. Adjacent to Chippewa Road
b. Within the park
c. Near Mohawk Drive, connecting Chippewa Road to the northwest corner of the site
d. Connecting Chippewa Road to the park through the townhome neighborhood
Staff recommends this be included as a condition of final plat approval and it is included as a
requirement of the development agreement.
21) The street and watermain connection between Mohawk Drive and Arrowhead Drive shall be
constructed in connection with the development. At the City’s discretion, the City may
accept a contribution toward the cost of wetland mitigation and provide an equal amount of
credit toward required water connection fees.
The watermain connection will be constructed as part of the subdivision approvals. The
development agreement requires the applicant to pay $286,142 towards the wetland mitigation
costs for Chippewa Road. This amount would be reduced from the water connection fees
collected on the twinhomes.
22) The Applicants shall submit HOA documents for City review and approval which shall
describe provisions for maintenance of elements such as the private streets, trails,
stormwater improvements, lawn irrigation, upland buffers, landscaping, partitions/screening
between rowhome patios, and bufferyard landscaping.
Staff recommends this as a condition of approval, to be completed prior to any building permits.
23) The Applicants shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site
improvements, Chippewa Road improvements, and watermain improvements to ensure
completion.
Staff recommends this as a condition of final plat approval and it is included within the
development agreement. The letter of credit amount would include 150% of the cost of
Chippewa Road and of the “maximum exposure” for the City of the development improvements.
24) The request shall be subject to review and approval of Elm Creek Watershed, Minnesota
Department of Transportation, Minnesota Department of Health, Pollution Control Agency,
Metropolitan Council and any other relevant agencies.
Staff recommends this as a condition of approval.
25) Construction of Chippewa Road shall be permitted to result in a bounce above existing
conditions for the large wetland south of Chippewa Road, subject to permitting and
approvals by other relevant agencies and approval by the City Engineer.
The City received approvals from relevant agencies and was able to minimize the bounce to
0.36’. Reducing the bounce below this amount would have required significantly larger
culverts and the marginal reductions which would have been realized did not justify the
significantly higher costs.
26) The Applicants shall provide title documentation at the time of final plat application and
abide by the recommendation of the City Attorney with regard to title matters and recording
instructions.
Weston Woods of Medina Page 6 of 8 October 19, 2021
Final Plat City Council Meeting
The applicant has submitted title documentation and the City Attorney has drafted a Plat
Opinion. Staff recommends a condition of approval requiring that the applicant address the
comments within the Plat Opinion.
27) The final plat application shall be filed within 180 days of the date of the resolution granting
preliminary approval or the approval shall be considered void, unless a written request for
time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council.
The final plat application was not filed within 180 days because the applicant was waiting for
relevant permitting and agency approvals for Chippewa Road. Staff recommends an extension
of time and that the City Council proceed with review of the Final Plat application.
28) The Applicants shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for
the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, construction plans, and other relevant documents.
Staff recommends this as a final plat condition.
Tree Preservation/Replacement
The applicant proposes to preserve approximately 65% of the trees on the property, and to
remove approximately 35% of the trees.
The City’s tree preservation ordinance would permit removal of 10% of the trees during “initial
site development” (streets/utilities) and an additional 20% from each lot in the subdivision for
other construction. Alternatively, the City has permitted a total of 15% over the entire site rather
than calculating individual platted lots.
During review of the preliminary plat and general plan of development, staff had based required
replacement on the total of 15% allowed removal over the entire development site, resulting in
required replacement of 3372 inches, or 1350 2.5” trees. It would not be practical to plant this
number of trees on the site.
The applicant notes that of the 619 trees proposed to be removed, 77 are related to construction
of Chippewa Road rather than the internal development. A significant number of the trees are of
comparatively lower value. 75 of the removed trees are Boxelders, which may be exempted
from the Tree Preservation ordinance “when needed to manage other ecosystems and where the
removal will not cause erosion or damage to riparian areas.” The applicant also notes that 244 of
the trees proposed to be removed are ash, which may be vulnerable to future spread of Emerald
Ash Borer. The City’s ordinance does not currently exempt ash trees.
The Tree Preservation ordinance allows a waiver of the number of Trees required to be replaced,
at the discretion of the City Council, “for circumstances where the applicant has exhausted all
reasonable design options for the Development Site.” An applicant is only eligible for a waiver
if they implement of the following BMPs:
(a) Realignment of proposed streets and utilities in order to avoid Tree removal;
(b) Reduction of required street width and increase of street grade up to an eight (8) percent
slope by the city when the applicant can demonstrate that these changes result in Tree
preservation;
(c) The use of Private Roads in lieu of public streets;
Weston Woods of Medina Page 7 of 8 October 19, 2021
Final Plat City Council Meeting
(d) Variation in street radius and speed design;
(e) Modified grading plans;
(f) Flexible lot lines;
(g) Alternative utility configurations, such as the use of ejector pumps, force mains, or
revised home elevations to minimize grading;
(h) The use of flexible development standards, such as clustering of homes, in order to
preserve Old Growth Forest Remnants, Significant Trees and open space;
(i) The preservation of unique and rare Tree species or communities identified in the Natural
Resource Inventory; and
(j) The use of Low Impact Development principles.
The applicant has requested either a waiver as described within the Tree Preservation ordinance,
or for the City to provide flexibility for the amount of replacement as part of the Planned Unit
Development consideration. The applicant has indicated that full replacement cost may make the
project economically infeasible. The applicant has submitted a narrative (attached) to describe
how they believe they have addressed the BMPs above through design to preserve as many trees
as practical while still meeting the City’s land use/density requirements.
The applicant proposes to plant 493 trees, 75 trees beyond the minimum landscaping and
bufferyard required. The applicant also proposes to prepare a management plan to maintain and
improve the preserved wooded areas and to implement management activities for the first few
years while the project is under construction.
Staff believes the applicant did implement design practices to preserve trees on the site while
developing predominantly single- and two-family homes consistent with feedback from the City
on preferred land use and density. The applicant preserved the highest priority wooded area
identified by the City’s natural resource specialist by avoiding the 7 acre (5 net acre) wooded
maple-basswood remnant in the southern portion of the site and deeding to the City. The
applicant incorporated changes to the grading plan throughout the site to reduce the footprint of
impacts.
Based upon the proposed preservation and other public improvements proposed in connection
with the Planned Unit Development, staff believes the replacement through active management
of preserved wooded areas and reduction of planted replacement trees is reasonable.
Potential Action
If the City Council finds that the final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat and
that the conditions of preliminary plat have been addressed, and that the terms of the
development agreement are consistent with the Council’s expectation at the time of conditional
Comprehensive Plan approval, the Council can take the following actions:
1. Move to adopt the resolution adopting the Weston Woods of Medina Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
2. Move to adopt the resolution granting final plat approval for Weston Woods of Medina.
3. Move to approve the Development Agreement
Weston Woods of Medina Page 8 of 8 October 19, 2021
Final Plat City Council Meeting
Attachments
1. Draft resolution adopting Comprehensive Plan Amendment
2. Draft resolution granting final plat approval
3. Development Agreement
4. Ordinance 667
5. Engineering Comments
6. Narrative describing proposed tree replacement and rationale for reduction
7. Architectural guidelines
8. Twinhome plans
9. Plat
10. Plans
Resolution No. 2021-##
DATE
Member _____ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-##
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, organized and
existing under the laws of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Mark R. Smith and Kathleen R. Smith (the “Owners”) own property located
at 1952 Chippewa Road (the “Northern Parcel”) and also own property located immediately to the
south, generally located east of Mohawk Drive, north of Highway 55, and south of Chippewa Road
(the “Southern Parcel”); and
WHEREAS, the Northern Parcel and Southern Parcel (collectively the “Property”) are
legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the Owners requested that the City amend its Comprehensive Plan with
regard to the Property which generally makes the following changes:
1) Change of Staging and Growth of the Northern Parcel (78.5 gross acres; 28 net acres)
from 2025 to 2020.
2) Change of Future Land Use of the Southern Parcel (-52.5 gross acres; 29.2 net acres)
from Business to:
a) Low Density Residential (+38.8 gross acres; 17.0 net acres)
b) Medium Density Residential (+6.3 gross acres; 4.8 net acres)
c) Parks, Recreation, Open Space (+7.4 gross acres; 7.4 net acres); and
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution 2020-18, granting
conditional approval of the Weston Woods of Medina Comprehensive Plan Amendment and
authorizing submission to the Metropolitan Council for review; and
WHEREAS, Resolution 2020-18 was subject to certain conditions prior to Comprehensive
Plan Amendment being adopted and placed into effect; and
WHEREAS, on May 12, 2020, the Metropolitan Council authorized the City to place the
amendment into effect; and
WHEREAS, on January 19, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-05,
authorizing submission of an adjustment to the Weston Woods of Medina Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to the Metropolitan Council for review; and
WHEREAS, on April 8, 2021, the Metropolitan Council authorized the City to place the
adjusted amendment into effect.
Resolution No. 2021-## 2
DATE
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the City of Medina,
Minnesota that the Weston Woods of Medina Comprehensive Plan as depicted in Exhibit B,
attached hereto, is hereby approved, but shall not become effective until:
1) The City has granted final approval of the plat of Weston Woods of Medina;
2) The Owners and City have entered into a development agreement in a form and of
substance acceptable to the City which provides for the construction of necessary
infrastructure improvements as originally described in the staff report dated March 12,
2020, subject to any modifications approved by the City; and
3) The Owners have submitted required financial guarantees to ensure completion of the
aforementioned improvements.
Dated: .
__________________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _______
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2021-## 3
DATE
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description of the Property
Northern Parcel:
Southern Parcel:
Resolution No. 2021-## 4
DATE
EXHIBIT B
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Table 5-2 – Future Land Use to be amended as follows:
Table 5-3 – Net Residential Density to be amended as follows:
Resolution No. 2021-## 5
DATE
Table 5-4 – Staging Plan – Residential Development Capacity to be amended as follows:
Table 5-5 – Staging Plan – Net Acres to be amended as follows:
Resolution No. 2021-## 6
DATE
Map 5-3 to be amended as follows:
Resolution No. 2021-## 7
DATE
Map 5-5 to be amended as follows:
Resolution No. 2021-## 1
DATE
Member ______ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-##
RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR
WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, organized and
existing under the laws of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Mark and Kathleen Smith (the “Applicants”) own property located north of
Highway 55 and east of Mohawk Drive (the “Property”), which is legally described in Exhibit A,
attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, on January 5, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-03, granting,
subject to various conditions, preliminary plat and planned unit development general plan approval
to subdivide and develop the Property into 76 twinhome lots, 42 single-family lots, and 32
townhome lots; and
WHEREAS, on January 5, 2021, the City Council also adopted Ordinance No. 667,
establishing a planned unit development district for Weston Woods of Medina, which was intended
to regulate development upon the Property pursuant to the City’s Planned Unit Development
regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Applicants have now requested final plat approval of Weston Woods of
Medina, the first phase of the development to include all the 42 single-family lots and 76 twinhome
lots, an outlot intended to be deeded to the City for parkland and preservation of woodlands, an
outlot intended to be replatted in the future for the townhome lots, and a series of outlots to contain
various common elements; and
WHEREAS, on October 19, 2021, the City Council reviewed the plat for consistency with
the approved preliminary plat and compliance with the terms and conditions of preliminary
approval; and
WHEREAS, upon review of the final plat the Council finds that, subject to certain terms
and conditions, the plat is substantially consistent with the approved preliminary plat and the terms
and conditions thereof, the requirements of the City’s subdivision regulations, and the
requirements, terms and conditions of the underlying planned unit development district
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota
hereby grants final plat approval for Weston Woods of Medina, subject to the following terms
and conditions:
Resolution No. 2021-## 2
DATE
1) The Applicants shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include
the conditions described below as well as other requirements of City ordinance or policy.
2) The Applicants shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated 10/12/2021 except
as may be modified herein.
3) The Applicants shall update plans to address all comments of the City Engineer.
4) The Applicants shall meet the requirements of the approved wetland replacement plan for
proposed wetland impacts.
5) Construction of the twinhomes and single-family homes shall be subject to administrative
review by City staff for consistency with the site plan which accompanies the plat,
architectural guidelines submitted 10/14/2021, relevant requirements of City Code, and the
conditions noted herein.
6) The Applicants shall execute and record a private road easement/agreement in a form and of
substance acceptable to the City Attorney related to access to and maintenance of the private
roadways.
7) The Applicants shall execute and record a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement in a form
and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney to describe the responsibility of the
property owners to maintain the private stormwater improvements.
8) The Applicants shall execute and record a trail easement to accommodate all public trails,
which shall meet all requirements of the City Attorney.
9) The Applicants shall meet all requirements of the wetland protection ordinance, including
provision of easements, planting of vegetation and installation of signage.
10) The plat shall be updated to designate all common areas as Outlots rather than Lots.
11) The plat shall provide drainage and utility easements over all utilities, stormwater
improvements, wetlands, and drainageways as recommended by the City Engineer. The plat
shall also provide easements along the perimeter of the lots and between buildings as
recommended by the City Engineer.
12) Future application for Final Plat for the replatting and development of the townhomes in
Outlot E shall be subject to the following conditions:
a. Plans shall be updated to either relocate the access point from Chippewa Road to the
townhome area further east, or to remove the access point. If the access point is
removed, the trail connection between Chippewa Road and the townhome area shall be
designed and constructed as a secondary emergency access if determined necessary by
Public Safety. The specifications shall be reviewed and approved by City staff.
b. The design of the townhome roadway shall be updated as necessary to improve
emergency vehicle circulation.
c. The Applicants shall submit architectural guidelines for the townhomes for review and
approval by the City at the time of final plat application. The guidelines shall include, at
a minimum, the following improvements from the photos and illustrations provided with
the general plan of development, consistent with the direction of the City Council at the
December 15, 2020 meeting, including:
i. Architectural features upon the rear façades of the townhome buildings which face
streets, including modulation, accent materials and other elements.
ii. Partitions or other means of screening to provide privacy between ground level
patio areas of townhome units.
d. A site plan review of each townhome building within the development site shall not be
required as described in Section 825.55 of City Code. However, each building shall be
Resolution No. 2021-## 3
DATE
subject to administrative review by City staff for consistency with the site plan which
accompanies the plat, architectural requirements established in the guidelines approved
by the City at the time of final plat review, relevant requirements of City Code, and the
conditions noted herein.
e. The replatting and development of Outlot E shall be subject to dedication of public trail
easements and construction of a trail by the developer of Outlot E connecting Chippewa
Road to the trail within Outlot B.
13) The Property shall be subject to the City’s lawn and landscaping irrigation regulations. No
lawn or landscape irrigation systems shall be permitted to be connected to the City water
system. The Applicants shall address comments of the City Engineer and Public Works
Director related to the design and installation of the irrigation system.
14) The required upland buffer adjacent to Lots 31-34, Block 7 may be reduced to 15 feet in
width pursuant Subd. 5(f) of Section 828.43. The Applicants shall update plans to provide
for the buffer easement of this minimum width.
15) The plans and construction of Chippewa Road shall be abided by the comments and
recommendations of the City Engineer.
16) The Applicants shall plant replacement trees as indicated in the plans received by the City
on 10/14/2021 and record a tree protection declaration to protect preserved trees. The
Applicants shall submit a woodland management plan for review and approval of City staff
and shall implement the activities within the management plan through the year 2025 in lieu
of replacing more trees upon the Property. The Applicants may transfer obligation for the
management plan to the HOA.
17) Plans shall be updated to provide a trail along Hillside Drive connecting the gap between the
trails within Outlot B and Outlot A.
18) Street names shall be consistent with City naming policies. Specifically, Leaping Deer Lane
shall be updated to Leaping Deer Court.
19) The Applicants shall convey Outlot C to the City with via warranty deed. Plans shall be
updated to include signage or other means to clearly delineate the preserved areas from
private lots.
20) The Applicants shall construct the following paved trails and provide easements over the
locations as recommended by City staff:
a. Adjacent to Chippewa Road
b. Within the park
c. Near Mohawk Drive, connecting Chippewa Road to the northwest corner of the site
d. Connecting Chippewa Road to the park through the townhome neighborhood
21) The Applicant shall construct Chippewa Road and the watermain connection between
Mohawk Drive and Arrowhead Drive as depicted in the plans received by the City on
10/12/2021, except such plans shall be updated to address the comments of the City
Engineer.
22) The Applicants shall submit HOA documents for City review and approval prior to issuance
of any building permits on the Property. Such documents shall describe provisions for
maintenance of elements such as the private streets, trails, stormwater improvements, lawn
irrigation, upland buffers, landscaping, partitions/screening between townhomes patios, and
buffer yard landscaping.
Resolution No. 2021-## 4
DATE
23) The Applicants shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site
improvements, Chippewa Road improvements, and watermain improvements to ensure
completion.
24) The Applicants shall obtain permits from Elm Creek Watershed, Minnesota Department of
Health, Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Council and any other relevant agencies.
25) Construction of Chippewa Road shall be permitted to result in a bounce above existing
conditions for the large wetland south of Chippewa Road, subject to permitting and
approvals by other relevant agencies and approval by the City Engineer.
26) The Applicants shall address the comments of the City Attorney’s Plat Opinion and
otherwise abide by the recommendation of the City Attorney with regard to title matters and
recording instructions.
27) The final plat shall be filed within 180 days of the date of this resolution or the approval
shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the
applicant and approved by the City Council.
28) The Applicants shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for
the cost of reviewing the plat, construction plans, and other relevant documents.
Dated: .
By: ______________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
By: ___________________________
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _________
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2021-## 5
DATE
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description of the Property
Resolution No. 2021-## 6
DATE
735604.v8
DRAFT 10-11-21
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF MEDINA
AND
MARK R. SMITH AND KATHLEEN R. SMITH
FOR
WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
This document drafted by:
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
700 Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
735604.v8 i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1. Zoning; Number of Units; Adherence to General Plan ................................................................. 1
2. Right to Proceed ............................................................................................................................ 2
3. Plans; Improvements ..................................................................................................................... 3
4. Erosion Control ............................................................................................................................. 4
5. Site Grading; Haul Routes ............................................................................................................ 5
6. Construction of Subdivision Improvements ................................................................................. 5
7. Private Roads ................................................................................................................................ 6
8. Public Streets; Chippewa Road Improvements ............................................................................. 7
9. Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements ..................................................................................... 8
10. Stormwater Improvements ............................................................................................................ 8
11. Landscaping Plan; Landscape Irrigation System; Tree Removal ................................................. 9
12. Street Lighting and Signs ............................................................................................................ 10
13. Trails and Sidewalks ................................................................................................................... 10
14. Letter of Credit ............................................................................................................................ 10
15. Homeowners’ Association .......................................................................................................... 11
16. Wetlands; Upland Buffer and Preservation Area Easement Agreement..................................... 12
17. City Trunk Connection Rates; SAC Fees ................................................................................... 12
18. Park Dedication Requirements ................................................................................................... 12
19. Responsibility for Costs; Escrow for Construction Inspection ................................................... 13
20. Developer’s Default .................................................................................................................... 13
21. Insurance ..................................................................................................................................... 14
22. No Building Permits Approved; Certificates of Occupancy ....................................................... 14
23. Clean up and Dust Control .......................................................................................................... 14
24. Compliance with Laws ............................................................................................................... 14
25. Agreement Runs with the Land .................................................................................................. 15
26. Indemnification ........................................................................................................................... 15
27. Assignment ................................................................................................................................. 15
28. Notices ........................................................................................................................................ 15
29. Severability ................................................................................................................................. 16
30. Non-waiver ................................................................................................................................. 16
31. Counterparts ................................................................................................................................ 16
SIGNATURES .......................................................................................................................................... 17-18
EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
EXHIBIT B LIST OF PLAN DOCUMENTS
EXHIBIT C FORM OF PRIVATE ROAD MAINTENANCE/EASEMENT AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT D FORM OF STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT E FORM OF TREE PROTECTION DECLARATION
EXHIBIT F DEPICTION OF PUBLIC TRAILS
EXHIBIT G FORM OF TRAIL EASEMENT
EXHIBIT H SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE
EXHIBIT I FORM OF UPLAND BUFFER/PRESERVATION AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT J FORM OF WARRANTY DEED
735604.v8 1
This Planned Unit Development Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into
this ____ day of ______________, 20__, by and between the city of Medina, a municipal
corporation under the laws of Minnesota (the “City”), and Mark R. Smith and Kathleen R. Smith,
husband and wife (collectively, the “Developer”).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Developer is fee owner of the property located at 1952 Chippewa Road
and that certain property located immediately to the south thereof, all of which is generally located
east of Mohawk Drive, north of Highway 55, and south of Chippewa Road and legally described
in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”); and
WHEREAS, the Developer previously submitted an application for approval to rezone the
Property to Planned Unit Development, for approval of a General Plan of Development, for approval
of a comprehensive plan amendment affecting the Property, and for approval of a preliminary plat to
subdivide the Property; and
WHEREAS, the Developer intends to develop the Property with 76 twin homes, 42 single-
family residential dwellings, and 32 townhomes for a total of 150 residential dwellings; and
WHEREAS, on January 5, 2021, to facilitate said development, the City conditionally
rezoned the Property to Planned Unit Development via Ordinance No. 667, and granted conditional
approval of the General Plan of Development (the “General Plan”) and preliminary plat via
Resolution No. 2021-03; and
WHEREAS, on _______________, 20__, the City granted conditional approval of a requisite
comprehensive plan amendment via Resolution No. ___ and final plat of the first phase of the
development, Weston Woods of Medina (the “Subdivision”), via Resolution ___; and
WHEREAS, the aforementioned ordinance and resolutions related to the rezoning, the
Developer’s General Plan, preliminary and final plat of the Subdivision, and the comprehensive plan
amendment shall be collectively referred to herein as the “City Approvals”; and
WHEREAS, the City Approvals are contingent upon the Developer entering into a planned
unit development agreement satisfactory to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the mutual covenants and obligations contained herein, the
parties agree as follows:
1. Zoning; Number of Units; Adherence to General Plan. a) Subject to execution of this
Agreement and all other conditions contained in the City Approvals, the Property has been zoned
Planned Unit Development and may be developed with no more than 76 twin homes, 42 single-family
residential dwellings, and 32 townhomes for a total of 150 residential dwellings. This represents an
increase in the density allowed and other requirements under the previous zoning designations of the
Property and was approved because the City, based on the plans submitted by the Developer,
determined that the development, with its proposed features, met the intent and purposes of its planned
735604.v8 2
unit development ordinance and the City’s comprehensive plan, as amended. Approval of said 150
residential units is strictly conditioned upon the Developer’s compliance with all terms and conditions
of the City Approvals and this Agreement.
b) Adherence to the City Approvals involves restrictions on the Developer’s ability to
use and develop the Property. The Developer has carefully reviewed the City’s planned unit
development ordinance and the terms and conditions of the City Approvals and understands the
limitations on the use and development of the Property that such regulations and approvals impose.
The Developer has knowingly and willingly agreed to be bound by such regulations and approvals
because it has concluded it is in its best interests to see the Property developed pursuant to such
regulations and approvals.
2. Right to Proceed. The Subdivision is the first phase of the Development and consists
of 76 twin home lots, 42 single-family lots, and __ outlots. The Developer may not construct public
or private improvements or any buildings within the Subdivision until all of the following conditions
precedent have been satisfied:
a) the final plat of Weston Woods of Medina has been filed with Hennepin
County;
b) this Agreement has been executed by the Developer and the City;
c) the required Letter of Credit (as hereinafter defined) has been received by
the City from or on behalf of the Developer;
d) final engineering and construction plans in digital form regarding the
Subdivision Improvements (as hereinafter defined) have been submitted by
the Developer and approved by the City engineer;
e) the Developer has reimbursed the City for all legal, engineering and
administrative expenses incurred to date by the City regarding the
Subdivision and has deposited with the City the additional inspection escrow
required by this Agreement;
f) the Developer has executed a Private Road Maintenance and Easement
Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C;
g) the Developer has executed a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement
substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D;
h) the Developer has executed a tree preservation declaration substantially in
the form attached hereto as Exhibit E;
i) the Developer has executed a trail easement substantially in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit G;
j) the Developer has executed the Upland Buffer and Preservation Area
Easement Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit I;
k) the Developer has submitted the storm sewer improvement tax district,
private road, and tree replacement disclosure statements required by sections
7, 10 and 11, respectively, of this Agreement;
l) the Developer has made the agreed upon payment to the City for wetland
credits as required in section 8 of this Agreement;
m) the Developer has met all requirements of the approved wetland replacement
plan;
735604.v8 3
n) the Developer has executed a warranty deed for Outlot C substantially in the
form attached hereto as Exhibit J;
o) the Developer has submitted and the City has approved the certified grading
plan;
p) all erosion control measures are in place;
q) the Developer has received all required permits from the Elm Creek
Watershed District, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and any other
entity having jurisdiction over the Subdivision;
r) the Developer or the Developer’s engineer has initiated and attended a
preconstruction meeting with the City engineer and staff; and
s) the City has issued a notice that all conditions precedent have been satisfied
and that the Developer may proceed to construct the improvements
contemplated by this Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Developer may request written approval from the City to allow
the commencement of certain grading activities prior to the final plat being recorded and receipt of
the full Letter of Credit, as otherwise required in sections 1a) and 1c) above, provided, however,
that (i) any decision regarding whether to grant such written approval shall be left entirely to the
discretion of City staff and consultants, and (ii) said grading activities may commence only after
the Developer provides the City with a letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount determined by
the city engineer to adequately secure 150% of the City’s maximum risk exposure in relation to
said work (the “Grading Security”). All provisions contained in this Agreement related to the Letter
of Credit, as that term is defined in section 14, shall likewise apply to the Grading Security,
including but certainly not limited to, all rights afforded to the City under sections 14 and 20.
The parties agree and acknowledge that this Agreement only facilitates the first phase of the
Development and any future phase(s) will require a separate development agreement that meets all
requirements of the City.
3. Plans; Improvements. a) The Developer agrees to develop the Subdivision in
accordance with the final plat of Weston Woods of Medina and the terms and conditions of the City
Approvals, which are hereby fully incorporated by reference into this Agreement and made a part
hereof, and to construct all required improvements in accordance with the approved engineering and
construction plans (collectively, the “Plans”) and this Agreement. In the event of a conflict between
the terms of the City Approvals and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control. The documents
which constitute the Plans are those on file with and approved by the City and are listed on Exhibit B
attached hereto. The Plans may not be modified by the Developer without the prior written approval
of the City or except as expressly provided in this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City
staff may approve minor changes to the Plans.
b) In developing the Subdivision in accordance with the Plans, the Developer shall make
or install at its sole expense the following public and private improvements (collectively, the
“Subdivision Improvements”):
1. site grading;
735604.v8 4
2. streets, public and private (Internal Public Streets, the Chippewa Road
Improvements, Private Roads);
3. trails and sidewalks, public and private;
4. sanitary sewer;
5. municipal water distribution system;
6. stormwater facilities;
7. landscaping;
8. landscape irrigation system;
9. upland buffers;
10. floodplain mitigation; and
11. street lighting and signage.
c) All work performed by or on behalf of the Developer on or related to the Subdivision,
including construction of the Subdivision Improvements and construction of houses on the lots, shall
be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m.
through 5:00 p.m. on Saturday.
4. Erosion Control. a) All construction regarding the Subdivision Improvements shall
be conducted in a manner designed to control erosion and in compliance with all City ordinances
and other requirements, including the City’s permit with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
regarding municipal separate storm sewer system program. Before any portion of the Property is
rough graded, an erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer as approved by the
City. The City may impose reasonable, additional erosion control requirements after the City’s
initial approval if the City deems such necessary due to a change in conditions. All areas disturbed
by the excavation shall be reseeded promptly after the completion of the work in that area unless
construction of streets or utilities, buildings or other improvements is anticipated immediately
thereafter. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall provide a temporary
ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be mulched, and disc anchored as
necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling
erosion.
b) If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or
supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems
reasonably appropriate to control erosion based on the urgency of the situation. The City agrees
to provide reasonable notice to the Developer in advance of any proposed action, including notice
by telephone or email in the case of emergencies, but limited notice by the City when conditions
so dictate will not affect the Developer’s obligations or the City’s rights hereunder.
c) The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all expenses it incurs in connection
with any action it takes to control erosion. No grading or construction of the Subdivision
Improvements will be allowed and no building permits will be issued within the Subdivision unless
the Developer is in full compliance with the erosion control requirements. The erosion control
measures specified in the Plans or otherwise required within the Property or adjacent areas shall
be binding on the Developer and its successors and assigns.
735604.v8 5
5. Site Grading; Haul Routes. a) In order to construct the Subdivision Improvements
and otherwise prepare the land for development, it will be necessary for the Developer to grade
the Subdivision. All site grading must be done in compliance with the Plans and the requirements
of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding contaminated soils. The City may withhold
issuance of building permits for structures within the Subdivision until the approved certified
grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by
the City. Within 30 days after completion of the grading, the Developer shall provide the City
with an “as constructed” grading plan and a certification by a registered land surveyor or engineer.
b) The Developer agrees that any fill material which must be brought to or removed
from the Property or adjacent areas while grading or during construction of the Subdivision
Improvements or any buildings within the Subdivision will be transported using the haul route
established by the City. The City designates the three established haul routes as Arrowhead Drive
to T.H. 55, Mohawk Drive to and from T.H. 55, and Chippewa Road to Willow Drive to and from
T.H. 55. Throughout the construction of various components of the Subdivision Improvements,
the Developer shall adhere to the City’s reasonable direction related to established haul routes.
6. Construction of Subdivision Improvements. a) All Subdivision Improvements
shall be installed in accordance with the Plans, the City Approvals, this Agreement, the City’s
subdivision regulations, the City’s engineering standards (as hereinafter defined) for utility
construction and the requirements of the report from the City engineer dated ______________,
2021. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications for the Subdivision Improvements
prepared by a registered professional engineer. The Developer shall obtain any necessary permits
from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota
Department of Health, the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission and any other agency
having jurisdiction before proceeding with construction. The City shall inspect all work at the
Developer’s expense. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all
instructions received from the City’s inspectors. Prior to beginning construction, the Developer
or the Developer’s engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting with all parties concerned,
including the City staff and engineers, to review the program for the construction work.
b) Within 45 days after the completion of the Subdivision Improvements, the Developer
shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible “as constructed” plans and three complete
sets of paper “as constructed” plans, each prepared in accordance with City standards and in
AutoCADD format based on Hennepin County coordinates. Sanitary sewer, water and stormwater
“as constructed” plans shall also be submitted to the City in GIS format compatible with ArcMap
10 in the coordinates and with the attributes directed by the City Engineer. Iron monuments must
be installed in the Subdivision in accordance with state law. The Developer’s surveyor shall
submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. All
Subdivision Improvements required by this Agreement shall be completed by no later than
September 30, 2023, except as specifically noted otherwise in this Agreement.
c) The Developer agrees to require its contractor to provide to the City a warranty bond
for the public streets, sanitary sewer, and municipal water distribution system to cover defects in
labor and materials for a period of two years from the date of completion of such improvements,
including the completion of the final wear course of bituminous on public streets. Because it is
735604.v8 6
contemplated that the public utilities and public streets will be completed at different times,
separate warranty bonds may be provided. During such warranty periods, the Developer agrees to
repair or replace any Subdivision Improvement, or portion or element thereof, which shows signs
of failure, normal wear and tear excepted. A decision regarding whether a Subdivision
Improvement shows signs of failure shall be made by the City in the reasonable exercise of its
judgment. If the Developer fails to repair or replace a defective Subdivision Improvement during
the warranty period after prior written notice to Developer and opportunity to cure as provided in
section 20 of this Agreement, the City may repair or replace the defective portion and may use the
Letter of Credit, as hereinafter defined, to reimburse itself for such costs. The Developer agrees
to reimburse the City fully for the cost of all Subdivision Improvement repairs or replacement if
the cost thereof exceeds the remaining amount of the Letter of Credit. Such reimbursement must
be made within 45 days of the date upon which the City notifies the Developer of the cost due
under this section. If the Developer fails to make required payments to the City, the Developer
hereby consents to the City levying special assessments for any unreimbursed amount associated
with such costs against the lots within the Subdivision except those which have been sold to
homeowners. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges the
benefit to the lots within the Subdivision of the repair or replacement of the Subdivision
Improvements and hereby consents to such assessment and waives the right to a hearing or notice
of hearing or any appeal thereon under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
7. Private Roads. a) The Developer agrees to construct private roads over Outlots
_____ of the Subdivision to serve certain lots within the Subdivision (the “Private Roads”), in
accordance with the Plans. The Private Roads shall remain private and shall be maintained by the
Developer or by the HOA, as hereinafter defined. Additionally, the Developer agrees to enter into
a separate private road maintenance and easement agreement, the form of which is attached to this
Agreement as Exhibit C, to ensure ongoing maintenance of the Private Roads and to provide the
City with necessary access to the Private Roads. The Private Roads shall be constructed and the
private road maintenance and easement agreement shall be executed and recorded prior to the sale
of any lots within the Subdivision. The Developer acknowledges that i) the Private Roads will not
be accepted by the City; ii) the City does not plan to maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or
replacement of the Private Roads and that the Developer initially and the HOA ultimately will
have responsibility for such work; iii) the City has the right but not the obligation to perform
necessary work upon the failure or refusal by the Developer or the HOA to do so; and iv) if the
City performs any work on the Private Roads, the City has the right to specially assess or otherwise
recover the cost of such work against the lots that are served by the Private Roads. The Developer
agrees to inform purchasers of lots served by the Private Roads that i) the City does not plan to
maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or replacement of the Private Roads and that the HOA will
have primary responsibility for such work; ii) the City has the right but not the obligation to
perform necessary work upon the failure or refusal by the HOA to do so; and iii) if the City
performs any work on the Private Roads, the City is authorized and intends to recover the cost of
such work from the owners of the lots served by the Private Roads.
b) The Private Roads shall be completed by no later than the date for completion of all
Subdivision Improvements, except that the final wear course of bituminous on the Private Roads shall
be completed within two years of said date but not until at least one freeze-thaw cycle occurs
following construction all other components of the Private Roads. The Developer shall also repair or
735604.v8 7
replace all broken or failing curbs and sidewalks, normal wear and tear excepted, at the time of
installation of the final wear course of bituminous.
8. Public Streets; Chippewa Road Improvements. a) The Developer agrees to construct
_______________________ [name of internal public streets] (the “Internal Public Streets”) in
accordance with the City’s street specifications and the Plans. The City’s street specifications are
contained in the most recent edition of its engineering standards (the “Engineering Standards”), which
is hereby incorporated into this Agreement by reference. If there is a conflict between the Plans and
the Engineering Standards, the Engineering Standards shall prevail except when an alternative has
been explicitly approved in writing by the City.
b) Additionally, to facilitate the transportation needs prompted by the development and
to provide for the infrastructure necessary in light of the approved modification to the Property’s
staging in the City’s comprehensive plan, the Plans include certain improvements to Chippewa Road,
including the construction of public street, public trail, and accompanying stormwater elements so
that Chippewa Road will extend from Mohawk Drive to Arrowhead Drive (the “Chippewa Road
Improvements”). Because the Chippewa Road Improvements will impact the floodplain, the
Developer shall also provide compensatory floodplain storage on the Property in accordance with the
Plans. Additionally, the Developer agrees to contribute toward the wetland credits that are to be
purchased by the City as a result of the Chippewa Road Improvements in the amount of $286,142,
and said payment shall be made by the Developer to the City in three installments of $95,380.67. Said
installments shall be due on the effective date of this Agreement (the date the Agreement is executed
by the second party) and on the first and second anniversary of said effective date. The City shall be
responsible for all design and permitting costs necessary for the Chippewa Road Improvements
incurred after January 5, 2021.
c) All public street improvements shall be completed by no later than the date for
completion of all Subdivision Improvements except that (i) the final wear course of bituminous on
the Internal Public Streets shall not be completed until after 80 percent of the single-family dwellings
in the Subdivision (34 of 42 single-family dwellings) have been completed; and (ii) the final wear
course of bituminous on Chippewa Road shall not be completed until one freeze-thaw cycle occurs
following the initial street improvements on Chippewa Road. Notwithstanding the above, upon
request by the Developer in writing, the City may authorize the installation of the wear course on the
Internal Public Streets prior to 80 percent buildout of single-family dwellings, provided, however,
that the City determines in its sole discretion that such authorization is in the public interest.
Additionally, the City reserves the right to require the installation of the wear course on any of the
Internal Public Streets whenever, at its sole discretion, it deems that to be in the public interest. The
Developer shall repair or replace all broken or failing curbs and sidewalks, normal wear and tear
excepted, at the time of installation of the final wear course of bituminous.
d) Following completion of the public streets addressed in this section 8 and the
inspection thereof by the city engineer, the City agrees to accept said streets for maintenance if they
have been constructed according to City specifications, including the Engineering Standards and the
Plans. Removal of snow and ice from said streets shall remain the responsibility of the Developer
until the City accepts the streets for maintenance. Until the City accepts Chippewa Road for
maintenance, the Developer may prohibit public access to Chippewa Road.
735604.v8 8
9. Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements. a) The Developer agrees to construct
sanitary sewer and water lines to serve the lots within the Subdivision as well as to extend sewer
and water mains to serve the Subdivision. The Developer’s work in constructing and extending
the utilities must be in accordance with the Plans and must comply with all City requirements
regarding such utilities. The sanitary sewer main and water main extensions, as contained in the
Plans, will be dedicated by the Developer to the City as public improvements upon completion
and acceptance by the City notwithstanding whether they are located underneath the Private Roads.
10. Stormwater Improvements. a) The Developer agrees to construct the stormwater
facilities in accordance with the Plans and in compliance with all City requirements regarding such
improvements. The stormwater facilities include but are not limited to the ponds, irrigation reuse
system, filtration basins, and related facilities, all as shown on the Plans. In the event that the
Developer installs a well to supplement the water used by its irrigation reuse system, it shall meter
and keep record of the amount of water utilized by said well and it shall make said records available
to the City upon request. The Developer acknowledges that an appropriation permit may be
required depending on the amount of water utilized by said well, per state requirements.
b) The stormwater facilities serving the Subdivision, except for the three ponds identified
in the Plans as 9P, 11P, and 12P, will remain private and will be maintained by the Developer at its
sole expense until taken over by the HOA, as hereinafter defined. Except for the three public ponds
identified in the preceding sentence, the City does not intend to accept the stormwater facilities as
public and does not intend to maintain them. In order to meet the requirements of the Elm Creek
Watershed Management Commission and City code, the Developer agrees to enter into a Stormwater
Maintenance Agreement with the City in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D. The purpose of the
Stormwater Maintenance Agreement is to ensure that the Developer maintains the stormwater
facilities until taken over by the HOA and to give the City the right but not the obligation to do so if
the Developer fails in its obligations. The Stormwater Maintenance Agreement will be recorded
against all land within the Subdivision and will run with the land. The Developer acknowledges that
i) the stormwater facilities have not and will not be accepted by the City; ii) the City does not plan
to maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or replacement of the stormwater facilities and that the
Developer and ultimately the HOA will have primary responsibility for such work; iii) the City
has the right but not the obligation to perform necessary work upon the failure or refusal by the
Developer or HOA to do so; and iv) if the City performs any work on the stormwater facilities
after reasonable notice to the Developer or HOA and the failure of the Developer or HOA to
perform the work, the City intends to specially assess the cost of such work against the lots within
the Subdivision and other portions of the Property.
c) The Developer will make the HOA responsible for the maintenance, repair or
replacement of the stormwater facilities as needed and the HOA documents recorded with
Hennepin County shall so require. The HOA shall be responsible for the maintenance, repair or
replacement of the stormwater facilities serving any portion of the Property, except for the three
aforementioned public ponds. The Developer agrees to inform purchasers of lots within the
Subdivision that i) the City does not plan to maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or replacement
of the stormwater facilities and that the HOA will have primary responsibility for such work; ii)
the City has the right but not the obligation to perform necessary work upon the failure or refusal
735604.v8 9
by the HOA to do so; and iii) if the City performs any work on the stormwater facilities after
reasonable notice to the Developer or HOA and the failure of the Developer or HOA to perform
the work, the City intends to recover the cost of such work against the lots within the Subdivision.
Notwithstanding the above, the City will accept and maintain those elements of the stormwater
facilities which are located on public rights-of-way.
d) The Developer acknowledges that the City intends to establish a storm sewer
improvement tax district which includes all land within the Subdivision. The district will be
established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 444.16 to 444.21 and will authorize the City
to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain, and otherwise improve storm sewer systems
and related improvements within or serving the Subdivision if such work becomes necessary in
the opinion of the City. In recognition of this possibility, the Developer agrees to provide
prospective lot purchasers with a disclosure statement informing them of the existence of the storm
sewer improvement tax district and that a tax could be imposed on the lots within the Subdivision
if the City is required to repair or maintain the storm sewer systems and related improvements.
The wording of the disclosure statement must be approved by the City for use in connection with
the sale of lots in the Subdivision prior to its distribution or use by the Developer.
11. Landscaping Plan; Landscape Irrigation Plan; Tree Removal. a) The Developer
agrees to install landscaping in accordance with the Plans. All landscaping shall include hardy, non-
invasive and drought tolerant species appropriate for Minnesota. All landscaping materials shall be
maintained and replaced if they die within two years.
b) Any automatic water irrigation system utilized on the Property shall be equipped with
rain sensors or soil moisture sensors and is subject to the City’s irrigation ordinance and water
conservation ordinance which prohibits the use of treated municipal water in connection with
landscape irrigation systems. Notwithstanding the aforementioned prohibition regarding water
irrigation systems, water may be utilized from the public water system for a limited period of time
until the landscaping material within the Subdivision has been established. The Developer will
submit the plans for the irrigation system prior to any permit being issued for any structures within
the Subdivision.
c) The Developer shall provide replacement of 3,372 inches of trees pursuant to the
City’s tree preservation ordinance. The Developer shall plant replacement trees as shown in the
Plans. In lieu of planting additional replacement trees, and prior to commencing construction of
the Subdivision Improvements, the Developer shall implement a woodland management plan
approved by the City and pay a fee of $_______ to the City’s environmental fund for the purpose
of reforestation and woodlands management [the city council will consider the Developer’s
request for a waiver/exception at the time of final plat approval, and this provision can be
amended following the council’s decision, to any extent necessary]. At the Developer’s option,
the Developer shall have the right to provide an updated tree inventory prior to making payment
of the aforementioned fee. In the event that an updated tree removal inventory is provided, the tree
removal fee shall be recalculated in accordance therewith. Any tree removal on the Property
beyond what is contained in the Plans is subject to additional replacement or fees in accordance
with the City’s tree preservation ordinance.
735604.v8 10
d) The Developer agrees to execute and record a tree preservation declaration by
separate instrument in the form attached hereto as Exhibit E. Additionally, during construction of
the Subdivision Improvements and any houses, the Developer shall place signage within the
Subdivision regarding the limitations on tree removal. The Developer shall also provide
prospective lot purchasers with a disclosure statement informing them of the tree removal
limitations. The wording of the disclosure statement must be approved by the City for use in
connection with the sale of lots in the Subdivision prior to its distribution or use by the Developer.
12. Street Lighting and Signs. The Developer agrees to install street lighting and street
signs within the Subdivision at its sole cost. The City agrees to install, maintain, repair and replace
street lighting and street signs related to the Chippewa Road Improvements at its sole cost. Prior
to the issuance of any building permits, the Developer shall submit lighting details to the City for
review and approval by City staff. All lighting shall meet City standards. Street lighting shall
include lighting fixtures approved by the City and shall be equipped with luminaries which allow
no light more than five percent above the horizontal plane. The Developer or the HOA will be
required to maintain the lighting fixtures located along the Private Roads. Street signs shall be of
a design approved by the City and those located along public right-of-way shall be dedicated by
the Developer to the City after installation and acceptance by the City. If repair or replacement is
necessary for those street signs located along public right-of-way, the City will repair or replace
with the City’s standard form of street sign. Should the Developer or the HOA, as the case may
be, desire to repair or replace such signs with any other type of street sign, the Developer or the
HOA will be required to pay for repair or replacement. All street signs that are internal to the
Subdivision and not located along public right-of-way, i.e. those located along the Private Roads,
shall be maintained, repaired, and replaced by the Developer or the HOA.
13. Trails and Sidewalks. All trails and sidewalks shall be constructed by the
Developer in accordance with the Plans. Additionally, all trails, except for the public trails
depicted on Exhibit F attached hereto, shall be privately owned and maintained by the Developer
or the HOA. The City shall have no obligation to maintain, repair, or replace such private trails.
The Developer shall have no obligation to maintain, repair, or replace the public trails and the
sidewalks. If constructed in accordance with the Plans, the sidewalks shall be accepted by the City
at the same time as the public streets adjacent thereto, provided, however, that the Developer shall
be required to repair any public sidewalks damaged during construction of homes within the
Subdivision. The Developer shall also execute a trail easement in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit G. It is expressly understood and agreed to by the parties that the public trail easement
and construction required herein will not include a segment of trail that will extend through Outlot
___ of the Subdivision, which will be final platted and developed for townhomes in a subsequent
phase of the Development, because waiting to define the configuration of that trail segment will
provide the Developer with desired design flexibility for the aforementioned townhomes. To
accommodate said trail segment, the Developer agrees that it will provide another trail easement
to the City, in the same or similar form as required herein, and will construct said trail segment,
all at the time the future townhome phase is final platted and developed.
14. Letter of Credit. a) In order to ensure completion of the Subdivision Improvements
required under this Agreement and satisfaction of all fees due to the City, the Developer agrees to
deliver to the City prior to the City’s release of the final plat of the Subdivision for recording, a
735604.v8 11
letter of credit (the “Letter of Credit”) in the amount of $3,876,000.00 which represents 150 percent
of the estimated cost of the Subdivision Improvements as specified in the Plans. This amount
represents the maximum risk exposure for the City, based on the anticipated sequence of
construction and the estimate of cost of each element of the Subdivision Improvements, rather than
the aggregate cost of all required Subdivision Improvements. The Letter of Credit shall be
delivered to the City prior to beginning any work on the Subdivision Improvements and shall
renew automatically thereafter until released by the City. The estimated cost of the work covered
by the Letter of Credit is itemized on Exhibit H attached hereto. The Letter of Credit shall be
issued by a bank determined by the City to be solvent and creditworthy and shall be in a form
acceptable to the City. The Letter of Credit shall allow the City to draw upon the instrument, in
whole or part, in order to complete construction of any or all of the Subdivision Improvements and
other specified work within the Subdivision and to pay any fees or costs due to the City by the
Developer after written notice to Developer and Developer’s failure to cure the default within a
reasonable period.
b) The amount of the Letter of Credit may be reduced as often as monthly, in total or
proportionately, as the Subdivision Improvements are completed upon written request from the
Developer. Upon such request, the City agrees to reduce the Letter of Credit to an amount roughly
equal to 150 percent of the cost of the remaining work, subject to evaluation of the City’s maximum
risk exposure and satisfaction of the Developer’s financial obligations to the City. The Letter of
Credit shall be released in full and returned to the Developer within 60 days following installation
of the final wear course of bituminous; expiration of the two-year warranty period for the
landscaping; after satisfaction of all financial obligations by the Developer to the City; and after
completion and acceptance of all Subdivision Improvements. Prior to releasing any portion of the
Letter of Credit or accepting another letter of credit in replacement, the City shall first be satisfied
regarding the quality and completeness of the work and that the Developer has taken such steps as
may be necessary to ensure that no liens will attach to the Subdivision. Notwithstanding anything
herein to the contrary, the Letter of Credit shall not be reduced to less than $50,000, until such
time as the City releases the entire Letter of Credit and subject to delivery of the required warranty
bond to the City.
c) It is the intention of the parties that the City at all times have available to it a Letter
of Credit in an amount adequate to ensure completion of all elements of the Subdivision
Improvements and other obligations of the Developer under this Agreement. To that end and
notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, all requests by the Developer for a reduction or
release of the Letter of Credit shall be evaluated by the City in light of that principle.
d) If at any time the City reasonably determines that the bank issuing the Letter of
Credit no longer satisfies the City’s requirements regarding solvency and creditworthiness, the
City shall notify the Developer and the Developer shall provide to the City within 30 days a
substitute Letter of Credit from another bank meeting the City’s requirements. If within 30 days
of notice the Developer fails to provide the City with a substitute Letter of Credit from an issuing
bank satisfactory to the City, the City may draw under the existing Letter of Credit.
15. Homeowners’ Association. a) The Developer agrees to establish one or more
homeowners’ associations (collectively, the “HOA”), which shall include all land within the
735604.v8 12
Property, except for Outlot C of the Subdivision. The Developer agrees to record covenants
against said land for this purpose, which covenants must be in form and substance acceptable to
the City. The covenants shall be filed by the Developer with Hennepin County prior to any
building permits being issued for the Subdivision.
b) The HOA covenants must provide, among other things, for HOA maintenance of
the Private Roads, street lights and signage along the Private Roads, stormwater facilities (except
for the three public ponds identified in section 10 of this Agreement), upland buffers, preservation
areas, the private landscape irrigation system (if any), all common areas in the Subdivision, and
any other components of the development that, per this Agreement, expressly require HOA
maintenance. The City must approve the HOA covenants and will require that certain provisions
thereof may not be amended or deleted without prior written City approval. The HOA shall not
be responsible for repair, maintenance or replacement of the Chippewa Road Improvements,
public park, public trails or other public facilities, such as Mohawk Drive.
16. Wetlands; Upland Buffer Easement Agreement. The Developer must meet the
requirements of the approved wetland replacement plan. The Developer also agrees to execute the
Upland Buffer and Preservation Area Easement Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit I.
The purpose of said agreement is to enhance water quality in the wetlands, provide, following
completion of construction, no structures or fill are placed in those areas and in the preservation areas,
and to ensure that those areas are maintained in such condition thereafter. The materials to be planted
within the disturbed areas are specified in the Plans and vegetation therein shall be established
consistent with the City’s ordinances. The Upland Buffer and Preservation Area Easement Agreement
will be recorded against the Property and will run with the land. The Developer agrees to make the
HOA responsible for its maintenance obligations under the Upland Buffer and Preservation Area
Easement Agreement and the HOA documents recorded with Hennepin County, as required in section
15 of this this Agreement, will so require.
17. City Trunk Connection Rates; SAC Fees. a) In accordance with City policy and
to distribute uniformly the costs of public utility infrastructure improvements, the City will charge
the Developer trunk connection fees for the availability of sanitary sewer and water to the Property.
The rates are typically adjusted annually. The trunk connection fees for sanitary sewer and water
shall be payable at the time of issuance of each building permit at the then-current rates, provided,
however, that the per-lot water connection fee for the 76 twin home lots within Block 7 of the
Subdivision shall be charged at the then-current rate minus $3,765 in exchange for the Developer’s
construction of the 12” water main extension from Arrowhead Drive to Mohawk Drive.
b) The Metropolitan Council also charges the City a sewer availability charge for each
new connection to the metropolitan sanitary sewer disposal system or increase in capacity demand.
The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for any sewer availability charge paid by the City to
the Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council’s current rate is $2,485.00 per unit.
18. Park Dedication Requirements. The Developer shall meet its park dedication
obligations, as required in the City’s subdivision ordinance, through land dedication. Specifically,
the Developer agrees to convey Outlot C of the Subdivision to the City via warranty deed and in the
form attached hereto as Exhibit J, and the Developer shall execute a trail easement as required in
735604.v8 13
Section 13 of this Agreement. The Developer shall execute said documents, which shall meet all
requirements of the city attorney, prior to the City’s release of the final plat of the Subdivision for
recording. Upon acceptance of the public trails, the City shall be responsible for all costs of
maintenance, repair and replacement of the public trails.
19. Responsibility for Costs; Escrow for Construction Inspection. a) The Developer
agrees to pay to the City an administrative fee in the amount necessary to reimburse the City for
its reasonable costs and expenses in reviewing the Subdivision, including the drafting and
negotiation of this Agreement. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City in full for such reasonable
costs within 45 days after notice in writing by the City. The Developer further agrees to reimburse
the City for the reasonable cost incurred in the enforcement of any provision of this Agreement,
including reasonable engineering and attorneys’ fees. Reimbursement of such costs and fees shall be
subject to the Developer’s right to review of invoices, billing records, and other data to ensure that
the costs are reasonable and fairly attributed to the Subdivision.
b) The Developer shall also pay a fee for City construction observation and administration
relating to construction of the Subdivision Improvements. Construction observation shall include
inspection of all the Subdivision Improvements. In order to reimburse the City for the reasonable
cost of inspection of the Subdivision Improvements, the Developer shall deposit an additional
$125,000 into an escrow account with the City, which shall receive and hold such funds solely
under the terms of this Agreement. The City shall reimburse itself for expenses from the escrow
and will provide the Developer with a copy of any invoice from the city engineer or evidence of
other cost or expense attributed to the escrow prior to deducting such funds from the escrow. If
any funds held under this escrow exceed the amount necessary to reimburse the City for its costs
under this section, such funds shall be returned to the Developer without interest. If it appears that
the actual costs incurred will exceed the estimate, the Developer and the City shall review the costs
required to complete the project and the Developer shall deposit additional sums with the City.
Reimbursement of such costs and fees shall be subject to the Developer’s right to review of invoices,
billing records, and other data to ensure that the costs are reasonable and fairly attributed to
construction of the Subdivision Improvements.
20. Developer’s Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to construction or
repair of any of the Subdivision Improvements or any other work or undertaking required by this
Agreement, and such default continues for 30 days after the City provides notice to the Developer
of the nature of the default pursuant to the notice requirements in this Agreement, or if such default
cannot be cured within 30 days, after such time period as may be reasonably required to cure the
default provided that Developer is making a good faith effort to cure said default, the City may, at
its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense
incurred by the City. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary
for the City to seek an order from any court for permission to enter the Property for such purposes.
If the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, levy special
assessments against the land within the Subdivision to recover the costs thereof, provided,
however, that it does not exceed the total Letter of Credit amount specified in section 14. For this
purpose, the Developer, for itself and its successors and assigns, expressly waives any and all
procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments, including but not limited to,
hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the land so assessed.
735604.v8 14
The Developer, for itself and its successors and assigns, also waives any appeal rights otherwise
available pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 429.081.
21. Insurance. The Developer agrees to take out and maintain or cause to be taken out
and maintained until six months after the City has accepted the Subdivision Improvements, public
liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for
property damage which may arise out of Developer’s work or the work of its contractors or
subcontractors. Liability limits shall not be less than $500,000 when the claim is one for death by
wrongful act or omission or for any other claim and $1,500,000 for any number of claims arising
out of a single occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy. The
certificate of insurance shall provide that the City must be given the same advance written notice
of the cancellation of the insurance as is afforded to the Developer.
22. No Building Permits Approved; Certificates of Occupancy. a) Approvals granted
to date by the City regarding the Subdivision do not include approval of a building permit for any
structure within the Subdivision. The Developer must submit and the City must approve building
plans prior to an application for a building permit for a structure on any lot within the Subdivision.
All building pads must be certified prior to initiation of construction of a home on a lot. The
Developer or the party applying for a building permit shall be responsible for payment of the
customary fees associated with the building permit and all other deferred fees as specified in this
Agreement.
b) No building permit shall be issued for any structure within the Subdivision until
utilities and adequate access are available to the respective lot, provided, however, that no
certificate of occupancy shall thereafter be issued until all utilities are available and the first lift of
bituminous has been completed for all streets accessing said lot.
c) Additionally, no certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any home constructed
in the Subdivision unless prior thereto the lot has been graded and all landscaping installed in
accordance with the Plans, the driveway has been installed, the footing drain tile or sump pump is
discharging in an approved location, the water service valve is in proper working order and an as
built survey of the lot has been submitted and approved by the City. In cases in which seasonal
weather conditions, acts of god, supply chain disruptions, or other circumstances beyond the
control of the Developer, which make compliance with these conditions impossible, the City will
accept an escrow of sufficient amount to ensure completion of the work during the following
construction season.
23. Clean up and Dust Control. The Developer shall clean on a daily basis dirt and
debris from streets adjoining the Subdivision resulting from construction work by the Developer,
its contractors, agents or assigns, including any party constructing houses within the Subdivision.
Prior to any construction on the Property or adjacent areas, the Developer shall identify to the City
in writing a responsible party for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. The
Developer shall provide dust control to the satisfaction of the City’s engineer throughout
construction within the Subdivision.
24. Compliance with Laws. The Developer agrees to comply with all laws, resolutions,
735604.v8 15
ordinances, regulations and directives of the state of Minnesota and the City applicable to the
Subdivision. This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of Minnesota. Breach of the
terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall, among other remedies available to the City, be
grounds for denial of building permits for lots within the Subdivision.
25. Agreement Runs with the Land. This Agreement shall run with the Property and
shall be recorded against the title thereto and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the City and the
Developer and their successors and assigns. The Developer’s successors in title may be
responsible for certain obligations under this Agreement as required by the City. Upon request by
Developer or its successors or assigns, the City will issue a certificate in recordable form which
certifies the extent which the Developer is in compliance with the terms of this Agreement, and if
Developer has fully complied with and completed all terms of this Agreement, Releasing
Developer from this Agreement. As of the date hereof, the Developer warrants that to Developer’s
actual knowledge, there are no unrecorded encumbrances or interests relating to the Property. The
Developer agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing
covenants.
26. Indemnification. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City and
its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by third parties for damages
sustained or costs incurred resulting from approval of the Subdivision. The Developer hereby
agrees to indemnify and hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless for all costs,
damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including
attorneys’ fees, except matters involving intentional acts or gross negligence by the City.
27. Assignment. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the prior
written permission of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or
denied.
28. Notices. Any notice or correspondence to be given under this Agreement shall be
deemed to be given if delivered personally or sent by United States certified or registered mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested:
a) as to Developer: Mark R. Smith
2120 Otter Lake Drive
Lino Lakes, MN 55110
with a copy to: William C. Griffith
Larkin Hoffman
8300 Norman Center Drive, Suite 1000
Minneapolis, MN 55437-1060
b) as to City: City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340
Attention: City Administrator
735604.v8 16
with a copy to: Ronald H. Batty
Kennedy & Graven
700 Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance
with this section. The Developer shall notify the City if there is any change in its name or address.
29. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid,
illegal or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall pertain only to such
section and shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other section or provision of this
Agreement.
30. Non-waiver. Each right, power or remedy conferred upon the City by this
Agreement is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied,
now or hereafter arising, or available to the City at law or in equity, or under any other agreement.
Each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised
from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not
be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. If
either party waives in writing any default or nonperformance by the other party, such waiver shall be
deemed to apply only to such event and shall not waive any other prior or subsequent default.
31. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be an original and shall constitute one and the same Agreement.
*********************
735604.v8 17
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF MEDINA
By: __________________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
By: __________________________________
Scott T. Johnson,
City Administrator
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 20__,
by Kathleen Martin and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of the city
of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation.
____________________________________
Notary Public
735604.v8 18
THE DEVELOPER:
By:
Mark R. Smith
By:
Kathleen R. Smith
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ___________ )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 20__, by Mark R.
Smith and Kathleen R. Smith, husband and wife.
____________________________________
Notary Public
This document drafted by:
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
700 Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
A-1
735604.v8
EXHIBIT A TO
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Legal Description of the Property
The Property is legally described as follows:
[to be inserted]
735604.v8 B-1
EXHIBIT B TO
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
List of Plan Documents
[to be inserted]
735604.v8 C-1
EXHIBIT C TO
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
FORM OF PRIVATE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT
PRIVATE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS PRIVATE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT (the
“Agreement”), is made this ___ day of _______________, 20__, by and between Mark R. Smith
and Kathleen R. Smith, husband and wife (collectively, the “Developer”), and the city of Medina, a
municipal corporation under the laws of the state of Minnesota (the “City”).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Developer is the fee owner of certain real property located in Hennepin
County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”); and
WHEREAS, the Developer intends to develop the Property in accordance with a separate
planned unit development agreement entered into by the City and the Developer (the “PUD
Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the PUD Agreement, the Developer has agreed to construct and
maintain privately-owned and operated roads (the “Private Roads”) that will provide access to the
lots legally described on Exhibit B attached hereto (the “Lots”); and
WHEREAS, the Private Roads are legally described on Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, as a condition of the PUD Agreement, the City and the Developer must enter
into a maintenance and easement agreement regarding the Private Roads.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants of the parties set forth herein
and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
the parties agree as follows:
1. Construction and Maintenance of the Private Roads. The Developer hereby agrees to
construct, reconstruct, maintain and repair the Private Roads at its own expense. The Private Roads
consist of the grade, base, surface, ditches, culverts, stormwater improvements including, but not
limited to, drainage conveyance of roadway runoff, and all other elements and appurtenances
which create a driving surface suitable for vehicular traffic. The Developer acknowledges that the
City has no obligation to construct, reconstruct, maintain or repair the Private Roads and that the
City does not intend to accept, acquire, or open the Private Roads as public roadways. Such
construction, reconstruction, maintenance and repair shall meet minimum standards set forth in
the approved engineering and construction plans for the Subdivision. All of the Developer’s
obligations regarding the Private Roads shall also be obligations of the Developer’s successors or
assigns, and such obligations shall eventually be assigned to a homeowner’s association (the
“HOA”).
735604.v8 C-2
2. City’s Right to Maintain and Repair. a) The City may maintain and repair the Private
Roads if the City reasonably believes that the Developer or its successors or assigns has failed to
adequately maintain the Private Roads in accordance with section 1 of this Agreement and such
failure continues for 30 days after the City gives the Developer, its successors or assigns written
notice of such failure or, if such tasks cannot be completed within 30 days, after such time period
as may be reasonably required to complete the required tasks provided that the Developer is
making a good faith effort to complete said task. The City’s notice shall specifically state which
maintenance tasks are to be performed.
b) If the Developer does not complete the maintenance tasks within the required time
period after such notice is given by the City, the City shall have the right to enter upon the Private
Roads, and those portions of the Property immediately surrounding the Private Roads, as may
reasonably be necessary to gain access to the Private Roads to perform such maintenance tasks;
provided, however, the City will use reasonable efforts to minimize the disturbance and destruction
of landscaping and improvements within said areas immediately surrounding the Private Roads.
In such case, the City shall send an invoice detailing its reasonable maintenance costs to the
Developer or its successors or assigns, which shall include all reasonable staff time (at the
applicable rates charged by the City to similarly situated parties), engineering and legal and other
reasonable third-party costs and expenses incurred by the City. If the Developer or its successors
or assigns fails to reimburse the City for its costs and expenses in maintaining the Private Roads
within 30 days of receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City shall have the right to assess the
full cost thereof against the Lots that utilize the repaired portion for access and collect the same in
single or multiple payments as in the case of special assessments for public improvements pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. For the purposes of this section and the City’s right to impose
special assessments, the Developer’s successors and assigns shall be deemed to be the HOA or the
owners of the Lots.
c) The assessments shall bear interest at the rate determined by the City but not more
than 2 percent more than the average coupon rate if the City sells debt to pay for the cost of the
work or 2 percent over the average rate of return earned by the City on its investment portfolio if
the City finances the work without selling debt. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its
successors and assigns, acknowledges that the maintenance work performed by the City regarding
the Private Roads benefit the Lots that utilize the Private Roads in an amount which exceeds the
assessment and hereby waives any right to hearing or notice and the right to appeal the assessments
otherwise provided by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the
event of an emergency, as determined by the city engineer, the 30-day notice requirement to the
Developer for failure to perform maintenance tasks shall be and hereby is waived in its entirety by
the Developer, and the Developer shall reimburse the City and be subject to assessment for any
expense so incurred by the City in the same manner as if written notice as described above has
been given. Any maintenance or repairs made by the City pursuant to this section 2 will not result
in the establishment of any public roadways.
d) The City has the right but not an obligation to perform maintenance or repair the
Private Roads. The City intends to exercise this authority only if the condition of the Private Roads
is so poor, in the reasonable exercise of the City’s discretion, as to pose a hazard to the health,
safety and welfare to those using the Private Roads.
735604.v8 C-3
e) Notwithstanding any other language to the contrary, to the extent that the Private
Roads are damaged by the City, it’s employees, contractors or agents for any reason, including but
not limited to, damage arising out of repairing or replacing any City utility, then at no cost to the
Developer or it’s successors or assigns, the City shall repair or replace the Private Roads as
necessary, to the same standard as the condition of the Private Roads existed prior to the City
damaging the Private Roads. Further, if the previously described damage to the Private Roads by
the City shall occur then the terms contained in paragraphs (2) and (5) herein shall also not apply.
3. Conveyance of Easement. The Developer hereby conveys a non-exclusive easement
over the Private Roads for ingress and egress to the City for any public service deemed necessary
by the City, including but not limited to, response to police calls, fire calls, rescue and other
emergency calls, inspections, animal control, provisions for adequate surface drainage, and other
code enforcement issues. This does not convey a right to the general public to use the Private
Roads.
4. Drainage and Utility Easement; City Restoration. Because public utility infrastructure
will be located underneath the Private Roads, the Developer dedicated, via the plat of the
underlying subdivision that makes up the Property, public drainage and utility easements over the
entire area that makes up the Private Roads. The parties understand and acknowledge that the City
may be required to access its public infrastructure that is located underneath the Private Roads
pursuant to said easements, and in the event that it does so, the City shall thereafter promptly
restore the Private Roads in a manner that it determines, in its reasonable discretion, to be at least
the same or equal to the condition of the Private Roads before it commenced such work.
5. Reservation of Rights. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to, nor shall it, prevent
the City from the exercise of its full range of land use authority regarding the Property granted to
it by state statute, the City code or any other applicable regulation and the City shall be entitled to
apply its official controls to the Property in the same manner and to the same extent as if it were
served by public streets.
6. Hold Harmless. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City
and its agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, and expenses
(including reasonable attorneys’ fees) directly arising out of or directly resulting from the
Developer’s, or the Developer’s agents’ or employees’ grossly negligent or intentional
misconduct, or any violation of any applicable safety law, regulation, or code enacted by the City
or the State of Minnesota in the performance of this Agreement, without regard to any inspection
or review made or not made by the City, its agents or employees or failure by the City, its agents
or employees to take any other prudent precautions, except to the extent of intentional or grossly
negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and representatives. Nothing in this Agreement
shall be construed as a waiver by the City of any immunities, defenses or other limitations on
liability to which the City is entitled to by law, including but not limited to, the maximum monetary
limits on liability established by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466.
7. Recording; Run with the Land; Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be
recorded against the Property. All duties and obligations of Developer under this Agreement shall
also be duties and obligations of Developer’s successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of
this Agreement shall run with the Property. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon execution and
recording by the HOA for the Property of an instrument in a form satisfactory to the City assuming
735604.v8 C-4
and agreeing to perform the obligations and responsibilities of the Developer under this
Agreement, the HOA shall be bound by all terms and conditions of this Agreement as if it were
the original signatory hereto and the Developer, its successors and assigns, shall be released from
all personal liability under this Agreement but the Lots shall remain subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement.
8. Costs of Enforcement. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs
prudently incurred by the City in the enforcement of this Agreement, or any portion thereof,
including court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees.
9. Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall either be personally delivered
or be sent by United States certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows:
a) as to Developer: Mark R. Smith
2120 Otter Lake Drive
Lino Lakes, MN 55110
with a copy to: William C. Griffith
Larkin Hoffman
8300 Norman Center Drive, Suite 1000
Minneapolis, MN 55437-1060
b) as to City: City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340
Attention: City Administrator
with a copy to: Ronald H. Batty
Kennedy & Graven
700 Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in
accordance with this paragraph.
10. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be binding and effective as of the date first
written above.
*********************
735604.v8 C-5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF MEDINA
By: __________________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
By: __________________________________
Scott T. Johnson,
City Administrator
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 20__,
by Kathleen Martin and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of the city
of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation.
____________________________________
Notary Public
735604.v8 C-6
THE DEVELOPER:
By:
Mark R. Smith
By:
Kathleen R. Smith
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ___________ )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 20__, by Mark R.
Smith and Kathleen R. Smith, husband and wife.
____________________________________
Notary Public
This document drafted by:
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
700 Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
735604.v8 C-A-1
EXHIBIT A TO
PRIVATE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT
Legal Description of the Property
The Property is legally described as follows:
[to be inserted]
C-B-1
735604.v8
EXHIBIT B TO
PRIVATE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT
Legal Description of the Lots
[to be inserted]
C-C-1
735604.v8
EXHIBIT C TO
PRIVATE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT
Legal Description of the Private Road
[to be inserted]
D-1
735604.v8
EXHIBIT D TO
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
FORM OF
STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the ____ day of
_________, 2020, by and between the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the
“City”) and Mark R. Smith and Kathleen R. Smith, husband and wife (the “Developer”).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Developer is the fee owner of certain real property located in Hennepin
County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”); and
WHEREAS, the City has obtained drainage and utility easements over portions of the
Property (the “Easement Areas”); and
WHEREAS, by a separate planned unit development agreement (the “PUD Agreement”),
the Developer has agreed to construct and maintain certain stormwater facilities (the “Stormwater
Improvements”) for the benefit of the Property; and
WHEREAS, the Stormwater Improvements which are the subject of this Agreement
include, but are not necessarily limited to, the ponds, irrigation reuse system, filtration basins, and
all related facilities. The location of the Stormwater Improvements are shown on Exhibit B
attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission requires permanent
provisions for handling of storm runoff, including terms and conditions for operation and
maintenance of all Stormwater Improvements, and requires such provisions to be set forth in an
agreement to be recorded against the Property; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Developer intend to comply with certain conditions,
including entering into a maintenance agreement regarding the Stormwater Improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants of the parties set forth herein
and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
the parties agree as follows:
1. Maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements. The Developer, for itself and its
successor or assigns, agrees to maintain the Stormwater Improvements and observe all drainage
laws governing the operation and maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements. The Developer
shall make all such scheduled inspections and maintenance, keep record of all inspections and
maintenance activities, and submit such records annually to the City. The cost of all inspections
and maintenance shall be the obligation of the Developer and its successors or assigns as the fee
D-2
735604.v8
owner of the Property, which obligation shall be assigned to the HOA, as defined hereinafter, in
accordance with section 7 of this Agreement.
2. City’s Maintenance Rights. The City may inspect the Stormwater Improvements
at any time and shall have the right to enter upon the Easement Areas and such portions of the
Property as may reasonably be necessary to gain access to the Easement Areas to perform such
inspections necessary to ensure the proper functioning of the Stormwater Improvements.
Additionally, the City may maintain the Stormwater Improvements, as provided in this paragraph,
if the City reasonably believes that the Developer or its successors or assigns has failed to maintain
the Stormwater Improvements in accordance with applicable drainage laws and other requirements
and such failure continues for 30 days after the City gives the Developer written notice of such
failure or, if such tasks cannot be completed within 30 days, after such time period as may be
reasonably required to complete the required tasks provided that Developer is making a good faith
effort to complete said task. The City’s notice shall specifically state which maintenance tasks are
to be performed. If Developer does not complete the maintenance tasks within the required time
period after such notice is given by the City, the City shall have the right to enter upon the
Easement Areas and such portions of the Property as may reasonably be necessary to gain access
to the Easement Areas to perform such maintenance tasks. In such case, the City shall send an
invoice of its reasonable maintenance costs to the Developer or its successors or assigns, which
shall include all reasonable staff time, engineering and legal and other reasonable costs and
expenses incurred by the City. If the Developer or its successors or assigns fails to reimburse the
City for its costs and expenses in maintaining the Stormwater Improvements within 30 days of
receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City shall have the right to assess the full cost thereof
against the Property. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns,
acknowledges that the maintenance work performed by the City regarding the Stormwater
Improvements benefits the Property in an amount which exceeds the assessment and hereby waives
any right to hearing or notice and the right to appeal the assessments otherwise provided by
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of an emergency,
as determined by the city engineer, the 30-day notice requirement to the Developer for failure to
perform maintenance tasks shall be and hereby is waived in its entirety by the Developer, and the
Developer shall reimburse the City and be subject to assessment for any expense so incurred by
the City in the same manner as if written notice as described above has been given.
3. Hold Harmless. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the
City and its agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, and
expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising out of or resulting from the Developer’s,
or the Developer’s agents’ or employees’ negligent or intentional acts, or any violation of any
safety law, regulation or code in the performance of this Agreement, without regard to any
inspection or review made or not made by the City, its agents or employees or failure by the City,
its agents or employees to take any other prudent precautions, except to the extent of intentional
or grossly negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and representatives. In the event the
City, upon the failure of the Developer to comply with any conditions of this Agreement, performs
said conditions pursuant to its authority in this Agreement, the Developer shall indemnify and hold
harmless the City, its employees, agents and representatives for its own negligent acts in the
performance of the Developer’s required work under this Agreement, but this indemnification shall
not extend to intentional or grossly negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and
D-3
735604.v8
representatives.
4. Costs of Enforcement. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all
reasonable costs prudently incurred by the City in the enforcement of this Agreement, or any
portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees after providing written notice
to Developer and a reasonable opportunity to cure.
5. Rights Not Exclusive. No right of the City under this Agreement shall be deemed
to be exclusive and the City shall retain all rights and powers it may have under Minnesota Statutes,
sections 444.16 to 444.21 to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain and otherwise
improve the Stormwater Improvements.
6. Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall either be personally
delivered or be sent by United States certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, and addressed
as follows:
a) as to Developer: Mark R. Smith
2120 Otter Lake Drive
Lino Lakes, MN 55110
with a copy to: William C. Griffith
Larkin Hoffman
8300 Norman Center Drive, Suite 1000
Minneapolis, MN 55437-1060
b) as to City: City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340
Attention: City Administrator
with a copy to: Ronald H. Batty
Kennedy & Graven
700 Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in
accordance with this paragraph.
7. Successors and Assigns. All duties and obligations of Developer under this
Agreement shall also be duties and obligations of Developer’s successors and assigns. The terms
and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the Property. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon
creation of a homeowners’ association for the Property (the “HOA”) by an instrument in a form
satisfactory to the City which assumes and agrees to perform the obligations and responsibilities
of the Developer under this Agreement, the HOA shall be bound by all terms and conditions of
this Agreement as if it were the original signatory hereto and the Developer, its successors and
D-4
735604.v8
assigns, shall be released from all personal liability under this Agreement but the Property shall
remain subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
8. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be binding and effective as of the date first
written above.
THE DEVELOPER:
By:
Mark R. Smith
By:
Kathleen R. Smith
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ___________ )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 20__, by Mark R.
Smith and Kathleen R. Smith, husband and wife.
____________________________________
Notary Public
D-5
735604.v8
CITY OF MEDINA
By: __________________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
By: __________________________________
Scott T. Johnson,
City Administrator
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 20__,
by Kathleen Martin and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of the city
of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation.
____________________________________
Notary Public
This instrument drafted by:
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
700 Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
D-A-1
735604.v8
EXHIBIT A TO
STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Legal Description of the Property
The Property is legally described as follows:
[to be inserted]
D-B-1
735604.v8
EXHIBIT B TO
STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Depiction of Location of Stormwater Improvements
[to be inserted]
D-C-1
735604.v8
EXHIBIT C TO
STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
[to be inserted]
E-1
735604.v8
EXHIBIT E TO
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
FORM OF TREE PRESERVATION DECLARATION
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS
THIS DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS (this
"Declaration") is made as of this ____ day of ____________, 20__, by Mark R. Smith and Kathleen
R. Smith (collectively, "Declarant").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of certain real property located in the city of Medina,
Hennepin County, Minnesota and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property");
and
WHEREAS, in order to facilitate the development of the Property, a significant number of
trees were removed from the Property in excess of what is otherwise allowed under local law; and
WHEREAS, the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”), requires the
Property be protected from additional tree removal and that such provisions be set forth in a document
recorded in the real estate records.
NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant hereby declares the Property shall be transferred, held, sold,
conveyed, occupied and developed subject to the following covenants, conditions, and restrictions
which are hereby granted by Declarant and shall run with the land and be binding on all parties having
any right, title or interest in the Property or any part thereof, their successors and assigns, and shall
inure to the benefit of all owners thereof and the City. The Declarant will provide written notice of
the covenants herein to all future purchasers of lots contained within the Property.
1. Restrictions. Any tree removal that occurs on the Property shall be subject to the City’s tree
replacement requirements, or payment to the City of a fee in lieu thereof, both of which are
expressly provided in the City’s tree preservation ordinance, as may be amended from time
to time.
2. Severability. Invalidation of any one of these covenants or restrictions by judgment or court
order shall in no way affect any other provisions, all of which shall remain in full force and
effect.
3. Duration. The covenants and restrictions of this Declaration shall run with and bind the land,
and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the City, the Declarant, or any owner
of any portion of the Property subject to this Declaration, or their heirs, successors and assigns,
for a term of 30 years after the date this Declaration is recorded, after which time the covenants
and restrictions shall be automatically renewed for successive periods of 10 years each unless
this Declaration is terminated in writing signed by all of the owners of any portion of the
Property and the City, and such termination is recorded.
E-2
735604.v8
4. Notices. All notices under this Declaration shall either be personally delivered or be sent
by United States certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows:
a) as to Declarant: Mark R. Smith
2120 Otter Lake Drive
Lino Lakes, MN 55110
with a copy to: William C. Griffith
Larkin Hoffman
8300 Norman Center Drive, Suite 1000
Minneapolis, MN 55437-1060
b) as to City: City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340
Attention: City Administrator
with a copy to: Ronald H. Batty
Kennedy & Graven
700 Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in
accordance with this paragraph.
5. Amendment. This Declaration may be amended by an instrument signed by all owners of any
portion of the Property and the City. Each amendment must be recorded to be effective.
6. Interpretation. The interpretation and performance of this Declaration shall be governed by
the applicable laws of the State of Minnesota.
************************
E-3
735604.v8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the Declarant herein, have hereunto
caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year first above written.
DECLARANT
By:
Mark R. Smith
By:
Kathleen R. Smith
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ___________ )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 20__, by Mark R.
Smith and Kathleen R. Smith, husband and wife.
____________________________________
Notary Public
This document drafted by:
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
700 Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
735604.v8 E-A-1
EXHIBIT A TO
TREE PROTECTION DECLARATION
The land to which this Declaration applies is legally described as follows:
[to be inserted]
735604.v8 F-1
EXHIBIT F TO
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
DEPICTION OF PUBLIC TRAILS
[to be inserted]
G-1
735604.v8
EXHIBIT G TO
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
FORM OF TRAIL EASEMENT
TRAIL EASEMENT
THIS INSTRUMENT is made by Mark R. Smith and Kathleen R. Smith, husband and wife,
Grantors, in favor of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, Grantee.
Recitals
A. Grantors are the fee owner of the property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota and legally
described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”).
B. Grantors desire to grant to the Grantee a trail easement, according to the terms and conditions
contained herein.
C. The easement is legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto. The easement is depicted in
Exhibit C attached hereto.
Terms of Easements
1. Grant of Easement. For good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged
by Grantors, Grantors grant and convey to the Grantee a perpetual, non-exclusive easement for
public trail purposes over, under, across and through the portion of the Property legally described
in Exhibit B attached hereto.
2. Scope of Easement. The perpetual easement for trail purposes granted herein includes
the right of the Grantee, its contractors, agents, and employees to locate, construct, operate,
maintain, alter and repair trail facilities within the described easement area. The easement granted
herein also includes the right to cut, trim, or remove from the easement areas trees, shrubs, or other
vegetation as in the Grantee’s judgment unreasonably interfere with the easement or facilities of
the Grantee, its successors or assigns. The Grantor shall have no obligation to maintain, repair, or
replace the public trails and sidewalks.
3. Warranty of Title. The Grantors warrant that they are the owner of the Property and have
the right, title and capacity to convey to the Grantee the easement herein.
4. Environmental Matters. The Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs, expenses,
damages, demands, obligations, including penalties and reasonable attorney's fees, or losses
resulting from any claims, actions, suits or proceedings based upon a release or threat of release of
any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants which may have existed on, or which relate
to, the easement area or Property prior to the date of this instrument.
G-2
735604.v8
5. Binding Effect. The terms and conditions of this instrument shall run with the land and be
binding on the Grantors, their heirs and assigns.
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: NONE
Dated this _____ day of ______________, 20__.
By:
Mark R. Smith
By:
Kathleen R. Smith
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ___________ )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 20__, by Mark R.
Smith and Kathleen R. Smith, husband and wife.
____________________________________
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY:
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
700 Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
735604.v8 G-A-1
EXHIBIT A TO
TRAIL EASEMENT
Legal Description of the Property
[to be inserted]
735604.v8 G-B-1
EXHIBIT B TO
TRAIL EASEMENT
Legal Description of Easement
[to be inserted]
735604.v8 G-C-1
EXHIBIT C TO
TRAIL EASEMENT
Depiction of Easement
[to be inserted]
735604.v8 H-1
EXHIBIT H TO
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE
[to be inserted]
735604.v8 I-1
EXHIBIT I TO
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
FORM OF UPLAND BUFFER AND PRESERVATION
AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT
This Upland Buffer and Preservation Area Easement Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made
this __ day of ____________, 2021 by and between the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal
corporation (the “City”), and Mark R. Smith and Kathleen R. Smith, husband and wife (collectively,
the “Grantor”).
RECITALS
A. Grantor is the fee owner of property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally
described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”); and
B. Grantor and the City have entered into a separate planned unit development agreement (the
“PUD Agreement”) regarding the development of the Property.
C. The City has granted approval of the plat of Weston Woods of Medina concerning the
Property (the “City Approval”), under the terms of which the Grantor is required to (i)
establish upland buffers adjacent to wetlands on portions of the Property consistent with
City regulations, the location of which are legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto
and depicted on Exhibit C attached hereto, and (ii) establish preservation areas on portions
of the Property consistent with City regulations, the location of which are legally described
in Exhibit D attached hereto and depicted on Exhibit E attached hereto. Those areas
described and depicted on Exhibits B through E shall be collectively referred to herein as
the “Easement Area”.
D. In accordance with the PUD Agreement, the City Approval and the City’s ordinances, the
City has requested that Grantor grant to the City a conservation easement (the “Easement”)
over the entire Easement Area described and depicted on Exhibits B through E.
E. Grantor is willing to grant the Easement and to fulfill the other terms of this Agreement.
PROVISIONS
In consideration of the mutual promises of the parties contained herein, the parties agree
as follows:
1. Grantor hereby grants and conveys to the City and its successors and assigns, an Easement
in, under, on, over and across the Easement Area, and the City hereby accepts such grant.
The duration of this easement is perpetual, subject to Minnesota law governing granting of
easements to governmental bodies, and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties,
their successors and assigns.
735604.v8 I-2
2. The following terms and conditions shall apply to the Easement Area:
a. The Easement Area shall be planted with native grasses and other vegetation
consistent with the Plans, as that term is defined in the PUD Agreement, and
thereafter be preserved predominantly in its natural condition, except to the extent
set forth below. Following construction of the Subdivision Improvements, as that
term is defined in the PUD Agreement, no use shall be made of the Easement Area
except uses, if any, which would not change or alter the condition of the Easement
Area or its drainage, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, or fish
and wildlife habitat and characteristics.
b. No structures, hardcover or other improvements shall be constructed, erected, or
placed upon, above, or beneath the Easement Area, with the exception of a
boardwalk or dock not to exceed four feet in width to allow reasonable access to
and across the wetland.
c. Following construction of the Subdivision Improvements, no trees, shrubs or other
vegetation shall be destroyed, cut or removed from the Easement Area except as is
necessary to remove storm damage, diseased or non-native vegetation or as
authorized by the prior written consent of the City consistent with the city code. A
path no more than four feet in width may be mowed to allow reasonable access to
the wetland.
d. Following construction of the Subdivision Improvements, no earth, peat, gravel or
soil, sand or any other natural material or substance shall be moved or removed
from the Easement Area and there shall be no dredging or excavation of any nature
whatsoever or any change of the topography of the Easement Area without the prior
written consent of the City.
e. No soil, sand, gravel or other substance or material as landfill shall be placed,
dumped or stored upon the Easement Area, and no waste, trash, yard waste, manure
or other materials shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Easement Area
without the prior written consent of the City.
3. Grantor represents that Grantor owns the Easement Area in fee simple, subject only to the
encumbrances of record.
4. The Grantor conveys to the City and its successors and assigns, the following rights:
a. The City may enter upon the Easement Area for the purposes of inspection and
enforcement of the covenants contained herein and to cause to be removed from the
Easement Area without any liability any structures, uses, materials, substances, or
unnatural matter inconsistent with the covenants contained herein and the natural
state of the Easement Area. If there is a violation of the covenants contained herein,
735604.v8 I-3
the City shall provide notice and an order for corrective action consistent with City
regulations. If the Grantor does not take the required corrective action, the City
may enter the Property in order to perform the action. In such case, the City shall
send an invoice of its reasonable maintenance costs to the Grantor, which shall
include all reasonable staff time, engineering and legal and other reasonable costs
and expenses incurred by the City. If the Grantor fails to reimburse the City for its
costs and expenses within 45 days of receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City
shall have the right to assess the full cost thereof against the Property. The Grantor,
on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges that any such
corrective work performed by the City benefits the Property in an amount which
exceeds the assessment and hereby waives any right to hearing or notice and the
right to appeal the assessments otherwise provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
429.
b. The City may bring an action in any court of competent jurisdiction against the
Grantor to enforce the terms of this Agreement; to require restoration of the
Easement Area to its planted or more natural condition; to enjoin such non-
compliance by temporary or permanent injunction and to recover any damages
arising from such non-compliance. If a court determines that the Grantor has failed
to comply with this Agreement, Grantor or Grantor’s successors or assigns shall
reimburse the City for any reasonable costs of enforcement, including costs of
restoration, court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, in addition to any other
payments ordered by the court.
5. Grantor retains all responsibilities and shall bear all costs and liabilities of any kind related
to ownership, operation and maintenance of the Property and the Easement Area.
6. Grantor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officials, employees
and agents, against any and all loss, costs, damage and expense, including reasonable
attorneys’ fees and costs that the City incurs because of the breach of any of the above
covenants and/or resulting from or due to Grantor’s intentional misrepresentation of any
material fact contained therein. The Grantor and the City agree that each shall be
responsible for their own acts and the results of such acts and shall not be responsible for
the act of the other party and the results of such acts.
7. This Agreement may be amended only by mutual written agreement of the parties.
8. Nothing herein shall give the general public a right of access to the Property.
9. Grantor’s obligations under this Agreement run with the Property and shall be binding on
the Developer’s successors and assigns. Grantor’s personal obligations under this
Agreement terminate upon transfer or termination of its interest in the Property, provided
that any liability for acts or omissions occurring prior to the transfer or termination shall
survive that transfer or termination. Nothing in this Paragraph 10 is deemed to alter or
735604.v8 I-4
amend the remaining terms of the Agreement in the event of a transfer of the Grantor’s
interest.
10. Any notice required in this Agreement shall be delivered personally or sent by U.S.
certified mail, return receipt requested:
a) as to Developer: Mark R. Smith
2120 Otter Lake Drive
Lino Lakes, MN 55110
with a copy to: William C. Griffith
Larkin Hoffman
8300 Norman Center Drive, Suite 1000
Minneapolis, MN 55437-1060
b) as to City: City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340
Attention: City Administrator
with a copy to: Ronald H. Batty
Kennedy & Graven
700 Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in
accordance with this paragraph.
************************
735604.v8 I-5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Upland Buffer Easement Agreement have
caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year aforesaid.
GRANTOR:
By:
Mark R. Smith
By:
Kathleen R. Smith
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ___________ )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 20__, by Mark R.
Smith and Kathleen R. Smith, husband and wife.
____________________________________
Notary Public
735604.v8 I-6
CITY OF MEDINA
By: __________________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
By: __________________________________
Scott T. Johnson,
City Administrator
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 20__,
by Kathleen Martin and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of the city
of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation.
____________________________________
Notary Public
This instrument drafted by:
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
700 Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
735604.v8 I-A-1
EXHIBIT A TO
UPLAND BUFFER AND PRESERVATION AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT
Legal Description
The Property is legally described as follows:
[to be inserted]
735604.v8 I-B-1
EXHIBIT B TO
UPLAND BUFFER AND PRESERVATION AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT
Legal Description of Upland Buffers
[to be inserted]
I-C-1
735604.v8
EXHIBIT C TO
UPLAND BUFFER AND PRESERVATION AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT
Depiction of Upland Buffers
[to be inserted]
735604.v8 I-D-1
EXHIBIT D TO
UPLAND BUFFER AND PRESERVATION AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT
Legal Description of Preservation Area
[to be inserted]
735604.v8 I-E-1
EXHIBIT E TO
UPLAND BUFFER AND PRESERVATION AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT
Depiction of Preservation Area
[to be inserted]
J-1
735604.v8
EXHIBIT J TO
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
FORM OF
WARRANTY DEED
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $1.70
Total consideration for this transfer is $500.00 or less.
Date: ____________________, 20__
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Mark R. Smith and Kathleen R. Smith, husband and wife,
Grantors, hereby convey and warrant to the city of Medina, a municipal corporation under the laws
of Minnesota, Grantee, real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Outlot C, Weston Woods of Medina, Hennepin County, Minnesota
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, subject to all easements,
restrictions and covenants of record.
The Seller certifies that the seller does not know of any wells on the described real property.
A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document.
I am familiar with the property described in this instrument and I certify that the status and
number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed
well disclosure certificate.
By:
Mark R. Smith
By:
Kathleen R. Smith
J-2
735604.v8
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ___________ )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 20__, by Mark R.
Smith and Kathleen R. Smith, husband and wife.
____________________________________
Notary Public
Check here if part or all of the land is Registered
(Torrens)
Tax Statements for the real property described in this
instrument should be sent to (include name and
address of Grantee):
City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340
This instrument drafted by:
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
700 Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
4826-5753-4715, v. 3
CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO. 667
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
FOR "WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA"
AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
THE CITY COUNCIL OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City of Medina received a request to change the zoning classification of
the property legally described in Exhibit A (the "Property") to Planned Unit Development.
Based on the written and oral record before the Planning Commission and City Council during
review of the request as well as all additional testimony submitted to the City, the City Council
has found that the proposed rezoning of the Property to Planned Unit Development is consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan and serves the purpose of the Planned Unit Development district.
Section 2. The Property is hereby rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The
location of the zoning amendment is depicted on the map in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
Section 3. The Weston Woods of Medina Planned Unit Development General Plan is
hereby approved.
A. All entitlements, including but not limited to, allowed uses, density, dimensional
standards, setbacks and development standards established within this PUD
District are hereby set forth by the Weston Woods General Plan dated 12/4/2020,
which are incorporated herein by reference, except as may be modified by this
ordinance or Resolution 2021-03.
B. Any standards not specifically addressed by this Ordinance shall be subject to the
requirements set forth by the City of Medina Zoning Ordinance, including the
Single- and Two -Family Residential ("R2") and Mid -Density Residential ("R3")
zoning districts and other relevant standards.
C. The lots within the Property shall be classified as "Single Family," "Twinhome,"
or "Rowhome" as described in Exhibit B and shall be subject to the relevant
standards described herein.
Section 4. Allowed Uses. The allowed uses within the PUD District shall be as follows:
A. Single Family Lots. The permitted, conditional, and accessory uses shall be
those described in the R2 zoning district.
B. Twinhome Lots. The permitted, conditional, and accessory uses shall be those
described in the R2 zoning district, except that Accessory Dwelling Units shall
not be permitted.
Ordinance No. 667 1
January 5, 2021
C. Rowhome Lots.
i. The following shall be permitted uses within the Rowhome Lots:
a. Townhouse Dwellings, provided no structure contains more than six
dwelling units
b. Parks and Open Space
c. Essential Services
ii. There shall be no conditional uses permitted within the Rowhome Lots
iii. The accessory uses shall be those described in the R3 zoning district.
Section 5. Lot Standards.
A. The Single Family Lots shall be subject to the requirements of the R2 zoning district
except as explicitly described below.
i. Minimum lot size: 9,000 square feet
ii. Minimum lot width: 70 feet
iii. Minimum lot depth: 130 feet
iv. Minimum front yard setback: 25 feet, except garage doors facing the street
shall be setback a minimum of 30 feet
v. Minimum side yard setback: 10 feet
vi. Minimum rear yard setback: 30 feet. The rear yard setback may be reduced
to 20 feet if abutting a preserved open space or common area, but may not be
reduced if abutting public park property.
vii. Minimum Collector Roadway setback: 40 feet
viii. Maximum impervious surface coverage: 40%
B. The Twinhome Lots shall be subject to the requirements of the R2 zoning district
except as explicitly described below.
i. Minimum lot size: 3,948 square feet
ii. Minimum lot width: 42 feet
iii. Minimum lot depth: 90 feet
iv. Minimum front yard setback: 25 feet to back of curb
v. Minimum distance between buildings: 30 feet. Bay windows, balconies,
eaves, overhangs, canopies and other ornamental features not affixed to the
ground may extend into this setback, provided they do not extend a distance
greater than three feet from the structure.
vi. Minimum side yard setback: 5 feet, except the side yard setback shall be
reduced to zero for the common wall between two dwelling units. Bay
windows, balconies, eaves, overhangs, canopies and other ornamental features
not affixed to the ground may extend into this setback.
vii. Minimum rear yard setback: 15 feet
viii. Minimum Collector Roadway setback: 40 feet
ix. Maximum impervious surface coverage: 70%
C. The Rowhome Lots shall be subject to the requirements of the R3 zoning district
except as explicitly described below.
i. Minimum Setback from Perimeter of Site: 40 feet
ii. Private street setback: 23 feet to back of curb
Ordinance No. 667 2
January 5, 2021
iii. Collector Roadway Setback: 40 feet
iv. Minimum distance between buildings: 24 feet
Section 6. Design and Development Standards. All standards not specified by this
ordinance are to be the same as found in the Medina Zoning Ordinance for the relevant
underlying zoning district. The following deviations from the underlying performance standards
are hereby in place for the Weston Woods of Medina Planned Unit Development:
A. Building Materials and Design shall be consistent with the standards approved by
the City Council at the time of final plat review, which shall be subject to review
for consistency with the enhancements required in Resolution 2021-03.
B. Landscaping shall be consistent with the landscaping plan approved by the City
Council at the time of final plat review, which shall be subject to review for
consistency with the enhancements required in Resolution 2021-03.
Section 7. The City of Medina Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to place this
ordinance into effect and to make the appropriate changes to the official zoning map of the City of
Medina to reflect the change in zoning classifications as set forth above only upon adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment related to the Property and recording of the Weston Woods of
Medina plat.
Section S. A copy of this Ordinance and the updated map shall be kept on file at the
Medina City Hall.
Section 9. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, publication, and recording
of the Weston Woods of Medina of Medina plat.
Adopted by the Medina City Council this 5th day of January, 2021.
CITY OF MEDINA
By:
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
By:
G
Jodi MjlGallup, City Clerk
Published in the Crow River News on this day the 14th ofJanuary, 2021.
Ordinance No. 667
January 5, 2021
3
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description of the Property
That part of the South Half of Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, lying Northwesterly of the following described tine:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 01
degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds East on an assumed bearing along the east line of South half a
distance of 833.09 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 22 degrees
09 minutes 09 seconds West a distance of 86.32 feet; thence Southerly 173.73 feet along a tangential
curve concave southeasterly, having a central angle of 11 degrees 26 minutes 46 seconds and a
radius of 870.89 feet; thence South 10 degrees 43 minutes 23 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a
distance of 53434 feet; thence southerly 29.99 feet along a tangential curve concave easterly, having
a central angle of 10 degrees 06 minutes 25 seconds and a radius of 170.1 feet; thence South 00
degrees 36 minutes 58 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 30.00 feet to the south line
of said South Half and said line there terminating.
Abstract property
AND
Parcell:
The Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23, except
the West 468
feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 2:
That part of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter lying West of a line extending from the
Southwest
comer of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter to a point on the North line of the Northeast
quarter of the
Southeast quarter 660 feet West along said North line from the Northeast comer of the Northeast
quarter of the
Southeast quarter, all in Section 3, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property.
Parcel 3:
Outlot B, Gavanaughs Meadowwoods Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Abstract property
Ordinance No. 667 4
January 5, 2021
Parcel 4:
The North 468 feet of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3,
Township
118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 5:
The West 468 feet of the South 590 feet of the North 1058 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter
of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 6:
That part of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township
118 North,
Range 23, lying South of the North 1058 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Ordinance No. 667 5
January 5, 2021
EXHIBIT B
Map Depicting "Single Family," "Twinhome," and "Rowhome" Lots
Ordinance No. 667 6
January 5, 2021
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-27 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2021-09-16 Weston Woods Final Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
7
0
1
X
E
N
I
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
|
S
U
I
T
E
3
0
0
|
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
,
M
N
|
5
5
4
1
6
|
7
6
3
.
5
4
1
.
4
8
0
0
|
W
S
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
September 16, 2021
Mr. Dusty Finke
Planning Director
City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340-9790
Re: Weston Woods Final Plat & Plan Review – Engineering Review
City Project No. LR-21-302
WSB Project No. 016964-000
Dear Mr. Finke:
We have reviewed Weston Woods Final Plat & Plan submittal dated August 16, 2021. The plans
propose to develop 131 gross acres of land located north of Highway 55 and East of Mohawk
Drive with a mix of residential properties including single-family, twin homes, and row townhomes.
The proposed project also includes the construction of Chippewa Road from Mohawk Drive to
Arrowhead Drive.
The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina’s general
engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with
regards to engineering and stormwater management matters.
General
1. Provide soil borings and geotechnical analysis for Chippewa Road. In progress, a report
was provided with a recommended pavement section for the residential areas but did not
detail a specific section for Chippewa Road. Chippewa Road is a collector roadway with
the potential for 5,800 ADT; this 10-ton pavement section will need to be designed with
this in mind by the Geotechnical Engineer.
It should be further noted that the City’s standard pavement sections are intended to set
the minimum design section/standard. If the geotechnical engineer recommends a more
conservative pavement design based on localized conditions, this should be used as the
basis for the pavement section design and incorporated into the typical street sections for
both the residential roadways and Chippewa Road.
2. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building
structures and required turn around space (cul-de-sac, hammerhead, etc.) as required by
the Fire Marshall. Complete.
3. In addition to comments provided in this letter, additional notes have been made on the
plan sheets provided by the applicant. Most of these notes are summarized or included in
the comment letter, but some may not be.
4. The City received a preliminary plat application and plans for an adjacent development to
the east of Arrowhead Drive that included a roundabout in lieu of the “T” intersection
along Chippewa Road. Provide confirmation whether or not the roundabout is the
preferred design for this intersection.
City of Medina – Weston Woods Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review
September 16, 2021
Page 2
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-27 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2021-09-16 Weston Woods Final Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
5. On all plan sheets, make sure text and symbols are readable/discernable on a 11x17
sheet size. The stationing on the plans is not legible at this size and hydrants/valves are
difficult to see. The last sheet of the Chippewa plans is missing the sheet border.
6. Provide tree preservation plan.
7. Provide project specific specifications as to what will be required of the contractor for the
mass grading and soil corrections along Chippewa Road. The geotechnical analysis
should be referenced within these specifications.
Final Plat (Sheets 1-8)
8. See additional comments from City Planner and City Attorney.
9. A review of the landscaping plan will be provided by others under separate cover.
10. Provide specific drainage and utility easements outside of roadway areas instead of
noting them as outlots. In-progress, applicant noted outlots will have blanket D&U
easement over entire outlots.
11. Provide perimeter drainage and utility easements along the boundary of the property,
where applicable. Complete.
12. Provide drainage and utility easements for drainage from one lot to another;
a. Lot 9 Block 4
b. Lot 4 Block 4
13. Provide 100’ right of way in and around the Arrowhead Drive connection for future turn
lanes and/or widening. Show the proposed Chippewas ROW linework more clearly on the
utility/grading plans when revised. In-progress with Chippewa Road design revisions.
Existing Conditions & Demolition Plan (C1.X)
General:
14. Show impacts to roadways with connections to existing streets and utilities.
15. Review and correct overlapping/illegible text. For existing utilities the size and pipe
material should be legible. All sheets and text should still be legible at a 11x17 sheet size.
16. Show/hatch pavement removals along Mohawk Drive where applicable. Label where in-
place utility abandonment will occur, if applicable.
Chippewa Road Extension (C1.1)
17. Provide more specificity for removals occurring in and around Arrowhead Drive and
Hackamore Road. Consider how adjacent proposed development will affect removals.
Twinhomes (Northerly Development: C1.1):
18. Confirm whether or not there will be removal of Mohawk roadway with the utility
removals/abandonment for the existing home.
City of Medina – Weston Woods Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review
September 16, 2021
Page 3
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-27 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2021-09-16 Weston Woods Final Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
Single Family (Southerly Development: C1.1):
19. The existing conditions sheet shows what is occurring to the north within the Twinhome
area; eliminate unneeded information on this sheet (similar format as the Twinhome
sheet set).
Grading & Drainage Sheets (C3.X)
General:
20. Add storm sewer and sanitary manhole structure numbers to grading sheets.
21. Provide/note EOFs for all low points inside and outside the roadway.
22. Maintain all surface grades within the minimum 2% and maximum 33% slopes.
Acknowledged by applicant. Vegetated swales shall be a minimum of 2.0% in grade.
23. Provide top and bottom elevations for all retaining walls
a. Retaining walls over 4 feet in height shall be designed by a Minnesota
Registered Professional Structural Engineer
i. Retaining walls over 4 feet in height will require a safety fence
b. All retaining walls shall be privately maintained
24. Label the 100-yr floodplain elevation/contour on the grading plans.
25. Label the 100-yr HWL elevation of the wetlands on the grading plan. In-progress, make
sure the text is legible on each page/view.
Chippewa Road Extension (None provided)
26. Provide grading/contour sheets for the Chippewa Road corridor including
Arrowhead/Hackamore alignment.
27. Provide profile sheets for Hackamore and all of Arrowhead Drive up to and including the
connection to the existing roadway.
Twinhomes (Northerly Development: C3.1 - 3.5):
28. Label the EOF elevation for Wetland 1d.
Single Family (Southerly Development: C3.1-3.7):
29. Provide drainage and utility easements for drainage from one lot to another;
c. Lot 9 Block 4
d. Lot 4 Block 4
30. Direct drainage away from houses;
a. Lot 4 Block 5
b. Lot 10 Block 5
31. Provide grading plan sheet for east end of Meadowview Court.
32. Grading for Pond 12P is located outside of available property/right-of-way.
City of Medina – Weston Woods Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review
September 16, 2021
Page 4
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-27 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2021-09-16 Weston Woods Final Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
Erosion Control & SWPPP Plans (C3.X)
General:
33. Note that because the project will disturb 50+ acres and drains to a special/impaired
waterbody within one mile that the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit application
approval may take up to 30 days.
34. Proof of NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit coverage must be provided to the City
before initiating any land disturbing activities.
35. Utilize salt tolerant seed mixtures for roadway boulevard areas.
Chippewa Road Extension (C3.1 – 3.5)
36. Plans for Chippewa Road do not include a Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control sheet. If
it is the intent of the applicant to have separate plan sets for each of the three primary
project areas, the specific sheets will need to be added to the Chippewa Road plan set.
Twinhomes (Northerly Development: C3.0 – 3.5):
37. On Sheet C3.1, the Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Notes section references
Sheet 3.0 for erosion prevention and sediment control notes. Sheet 3.0 was not included
in this submittal. Please update the reference or include the notes in this package.
38. On sheet C3.1, provide energy dissipation for inlet protection on upstream side of pipe
inlets and energy dissipation on pipe outlets at intersection west of Block 7, Lot 6 and Lot
10.
39. On Sheet L2.1, a BWSR seed mix is proposed for permanent stabilization. Include the
proposed stabilizing cover (i.e., erosion control blanket, mulch, etc.) that will be paired
with the seed mix to establish vegetative cover. Ensure the stabilizing cover is included in
the estimate quantities.
40. The Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control sheets show locations where erosion control
blanket is proposed for temporary stabilization. It is not clear what is proposed for
temporary stabilization of all other exposed soil areas. Include a note or other clarification
to indicate how exposed soils will be temporarily stabilized. Ensure the stabilizing cover is
included in the estimate quantities.
41. It is understood that the lots will be turned over to builders for completion and wetland
buffers will be stabilized with a native seed mix; it is not clear what is proposed for
permanent stabilization of areas adjacent to the roadway and other areas that are not the
builder’s responsibility. Include a note or other clarification to indicate how exposed soils
will be permanently stabilized. Ensure estimate quantities are provided.
42. On Sheet C3.6 under SWPPP Contact and Training Information, identify who is
responsible for the long-term maintenance and operation of the proposed permanent
stormwater treatment system.
43. On Sheet C3.6 under Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control, Item 4, the 14-day
stabilization reference must be changed to 7-days.
City of Medina – Weston Woods Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review
September 16, 2021
Page 5
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-27 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2021-09-16 Weston Woods Final Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
44. On Sheet C3.6 under Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control, Item 5, the 14-day
stabilization reference must be changed to 7-days.
45. On Sheet C3.6 under Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control, Item 13, add clarification
that a dewatering plan must be submitted to and approved by the City before dewatering
activities can begin.
Single Family (Southerly Development: C3.1 – 3.7):
46. On Sheet C3.1, the Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Notes section references
Sheet 3.0 for erosion prevention and sediment control notes. Sheet 3.0 was not included
in this submittal. Please update the reference or include the notes in this package.
47. On Sheet C3.3, provide energy dissipation for inlet protection on upstream side of pipe
inlets and energy dissipation on pipe outlets at Pond 18P.
48. On Sheet C3.8 under SWPPP Contact and Training Information, identify who is
responsible for the long-term maintenance and operation of the proposed permanent
stormwater treatment system.
49. On Sheet C3.8 under Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control, Item 4, the 14-day
stabilization reference must be changed to 7-days.
50. On Sheet C3.8 under Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control, Item 5, the 14-day
stabilization reference must be changed to 7-days.
51. On Sheet C3.8 under Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control, Item 13, add clarification
that a dewatering plan must be submitted to and approved by the City before dewatering
activities can begin.
52. On Sheet L2.1, a BWSR seed mix is proposed for permanent stabilization. Include the
proposed stabilizing cover (i.e., erosion control blanket, mulch, etc.) that will be paired
with the seed mix to establish vegetative cover. Ensure the stabilizing cover is included in
the estimate quantities.
53. The Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control sheets show locations where erosion control
blanket is proposed for temporary stabilization. It is not clear what is proposed for
temporary stabilization of all other exposed soil areas. Include a note or other clarification
to indicate how exposed soils will be temporarily stabilized. Ensure the stabilizing cover is
included in the estimate quantities.
54. It is understood that the individual lots will be turned over to builders for completion and
wetland buffers will be stabilized with a native seed mix; it is not clear what is proposed
for permanent stabilization of areas adjacent to the roadway and other areas that are not
the builder’s responsibility. Include a note or other clarification to indicate how exposed
soils will be permanently stabilized. Ensure estimate quantities are provided.
City of Medina – Weston Woods Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review
September 16, 2021
Page 6
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-27 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2021-09-16 Weston Woods Final Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
Watermain, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Sewer Utility Sheets (C4.X)
General:
55. Provide confirmation of MDH (watermain) and MPCA (sanitary sewer) plan review and
permitting with final construction plans.
56. Any public sanitary sewer and watermain shall be encompassed by drainage and utility
easements where located outside of public road right of way. Drainage and utility
easements will need to allow for a 1:1 trench from the invert of the utility with a minimum
of 20’ centered on the utility. This is not achieved on Lot 60 or 76, see comments on
plans.
57. See specific comments on plan sheets. In general, simplify alignment to minimize
crossings, pipe, fittings, etc.
58. Verify horizontal separation between utilities and wetlands or wetland buffers for future
excavation and maintenance. Show wetlands and floodplain areas on utility plans.
59. Verify that profile stationing and utility linework matches plan view utility linework.
60. Hydrants should be located on the side of the street with sidewalk per the City typical
section standard. No parking is required on the side where hydrants are present.
61. For each lot/house location on the plans add the low floor opening elevation, sewer
service station from downstream manhole, sewer service invert elevation at utility
easement (10’ beyond ROW), riser height if applicable, and curb stop elevation.
62. Where watermain or water services cross sanitary or storm sewer within 36” show
insulation and provide a note “Maintain 18” Separation, 4” Rigid Insulation” on both the
plan and profiles drawings.
63. Show casings in profile views and eliminate bends shown in sanitary sewer services in
plan view.
64. Adjust watermain elevation/depth and hydrant locations to maintain hydrants at
highpoints for air relief/flushing.
65. All water services should be connected on 8” watermains prior to them being reduced to
6” for hydrant leads at the end of a cul de sac.
66. Sanitary sewer manholes will require internal chimney sealing using “Flex-Seal” or
approved equal. Add general note and a note to the City Standard detail.
67. Note pipe strength (SDR 26, SDR 35, DR 11, etc.) with watermain/sewer main labels.
Include storm sewer/FES numbers/notation and pipe sizes on utility plan/profile sheets.
Note size, material type, and pipe strength for proposed casing locations as well.
68. Add general notes to the utility plans to the effect of:
a. The City of Medina shall not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that
are associated with variations in the utility as-built elevations. All utility
connections shall be verified in the field.
b. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on
the submitted plans. The Owner and Engineer of Record are fully responsible for
changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City’s
standards.
c. All watermain and sanitary sewer testing shall be done in accordance with the
City of Medina standards and specifications. Copies of all test results shall be
submitted to the City (Public Works Director, City Engineer), the Owner, and the
Engineer of Record.
City of Medina – Weston Woods Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review
September 16, 2021
Page 7
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-27 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2021-09-16 Weston Woods Final Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
d. Watermain shall have a minimum cover of 7.5’.
e. The City will require televising for sanitary sewer pipe installations prior to
accepting a warrant for the utility system provide report and video files to the City
for review.
Chippewa Road Extension (C3.1 – 3.5):
Watermain:
69. An access will be needed where the watermain deviates from the Chippewa Road
corridor (located under the existing farm road) in order to provide maintenance access for
the City.
70. At Chippewa Road and Arrowhead Drive, see comments on the plans for preferred
connections depending on which intersection is proposed (“T” intersection versus
Roundabout).
71. Provide profile drawing for existing watermain and sanitary sewer along
Arrowhead/Hackamore. Confirm whether or not existing watermain will need to be
lowered in order to maintain 7.5’ of cover.
Sanitary Sewer:
72. See specific comments on plan sheets.
Twinhomes (Northerly Development: C3.0 – 3.5):
Watermain:
73. Relocate the gate valve from the north leg of the 8”x8” tee at the northwest corner of the
Twinhome development to the west leg
a. The north leg will install a gate valve with the extension
74. Shift the hydrant in front of Lot 72 in the Twinhome development to the north away from
the utility services but greater than 10‘ from the storm sewer crossing
a. Shift the mainline gate valve north past the service
75. There are numerous areas of conflict between the water and sanitary services and water
and sanitary mains between MH 10 and MH 16 in the Twinhome development
76. At Chippewa Road and Mohawk Drive the watermain connection will need to be made at
the existing 12” watermain stub to the south side of Chippewa Road.
Sanitary Sewer:
77. City design standards require 10.5’ sanitary sewer manhole builds, but at no point shall
build depths be less than 8’.
a. Although MH 8 (8.6’) and MH 9 (8.8’) meet this requirement, the sanitary sewer
main between them is shown as having as little as 2.5’ of cover over the top of
the pipe.
b. Although MH 9 (8.8’) and MH 10 (8.0’) meet this requirement, the sanitary sewer
main between them is shown as having as little as 4’ of cover over the top of the
pipe.
City of Medina – Weston Woods Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review
September 16, 2021
Page 8
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-27 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2021-09-16 Weston Woods Final Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
Single Family (Southerly Development: C3.1 – 3.7):
Watermain:
78. The City’s preference is to utilize the existing utility crossings on Mohawk Road to
minimize the need to disturb the street. This may require removing the existing service
stubs from the casings and extending larger mains to the existing north/south trunk line
on Mohawk. In-progress, applicant noted the stubs are not in ideal locations or sized for
connections based on the proposed site layout, this will require additional review and
discussion by city staff/applicant with the final plat submittal.
79. Simplify the alignment of the watermain crossing the sanitary sewer on Hillside Lane near
STA 10+25
80. Relocate the gate valve from the west leg of the 8”x8” tee at the intersection of Brookview
Court and Hillside Lane to the north leg.
a. The cul de sac cannot be back fed and therefore would be without water in the
event of a break or maintenance on Hillside Lane to the north
81. Provide an 8” to 6” reducer for the hydrant lead at the north end of Hillside Lane (~STA
15+00)
a. Note irregular hydrant lead with two 45 degree bends
82. Shift the hydrant in between Lots 3 and 4 Block 1 in the Single Family development to the
common lot line.
83. The existing watermain stub from Mohawk is not proposed to be utilized with the
development. The proposed Pond 18P is shown to be in close proximity to this stub, add
a note on the plans to excavate and locate stub. Depending on the proximity of the stub,
the City may require that it be cut back away from the pond to avoid future conflicts.
Sanitary Sewer:
84. Show all sanitary sewer risers between MH 28 and MH 29.
85. Show the assumed existing invert of the pipe for MH 26.
86. The existing sanitary stubs from Mohawk are not proposed to be utilized with the
development. The proposed Pond 18P and wetland in Outlot D are shown to be in close
proximity to this stub, add a note on the plans to excavate and locate these stubs at each
location. Depending on the proximity of the stub, the City may require that it be cut back
away from the pond to avoid future conflicts.
Storm Sewer Plans (C5.X)
General:
87. At the northerly entrance off of Mohawk Road, it appears the FES on the north and south
sides of the roadway will not have adequate cover. Consider the use of a catch basin in
these locations. Review plans for other instances of pipe cover inadequacies. Complete.
88. Consider adjusting the slope of culvert segment FES801-FES800 to reduce velocity to
less than 6 fps as it discharges to Wetland 2. Complete.
89. The maximum design flow at a catch basin for the 10-yr storm event shall be 3 cfs,
please review segment CB1503 to CB1502. Complete.
90. With Final Plat submittal, the City will require a common draintile collection system (rigid
PVC Schedule 40 or SDR 26) for sump pump discharges. A separate foundation pipe
City of Medina – Weston Woods Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review
September 16, 2021
Page 9
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-27 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2021-09-16 Weston Woods Final Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
system in addition to the sump discharge system should be considered where full
basements are proposed. Applicant noted they will add this to final plat where needed.
Chippewa Road Extension (C5.1)
91. See specific comments on plan sheets.
Twinhomes (Northerly Development: C5.1 – 5.4):
92. See specific comments on plan sheets.
Single Family (Southerly Development: C5.1 – 5.3):
93. See specific comments on plan sheets.
Street & Lighting/Signage Plans (C6.X)
General:
94. Include a grading plan for Chippewa Rd, Arrowhead Drive, and Hackamore Road.
95. Add stationing to plan view on all sheets and horizontal curve/radii length information on
the street design sheets. Add various width dimensions on the plan view. Use a different
set of stationing numbers for each street so that that there are not overlapping numbers.
96. Include hatching for differing pavement types (streets, concrete sidewalk, bituminous trail,
ped ramp locations, etc.) and include a legend. Reference the applicable typical sections
located on the detail sheets.
97. Note specifically locations of all pedestrian curb ramps. Include specific details and
references to MnDOT standard plates/plans.
98. The width of bituminous trails located at back of curb will need to be a minimum of 10’ in
width.
99. Include no parking signage on the signing and striping sheets. For Chippewa Road, there
will be no parking in general. For the development areas, no parking signage is should be
placed on the side with hydrants. More consistency will be needed with the hydrant
locations; the City’s preference to locate hydrants on the side with sidewalk.
Chippewa Road Extension (C6.1 – 6.3; C7.1):
100. The geometrics of the new Chippewa Road extension (classified as a collector roadway)
shall be based on a 40 MPH design speed for both horizontal and vertical curves. The
minimum length of a 40 MPH vertical curve is 120 feet, correct the curves that do not
meet this minimum standard. In-progress, further comments on the Chippewa Road
geometrics will be provided at a later date.
101. A profile for the Hackamore Road connection to Chippewa was not provided. This
modified roadway will need to meet the requirements of a 30 MPH design for horizontal
and vertical curves. The grading should be adjusted to reduce the 5.0% profile grade on
the Hackamore Road approach to Chippewa Road.
City of Medina – Weston Woods Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review
September 16, 2021
Page 10
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-27 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2021-09-16 Weston Woods Final Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
102. Review sight distance design on Chippewa Road and Arrowhead Drive (both north and
south).
103. Provide additional plan/profile view for Arrowhead Drive to the point where the proposed
roadway connects to the existing; this location is not clear on the plans. In progress,
profile was provided but it is not clear on the plan view where the transition takes place,
provide more detail on the plan linework.
104. Provide lighting, signing and striping sheet(s).
105. Where there is a 3:1 slope within 5 feet of the edge of the trail, a safety fence or barrier
needs to be included with the plans. See MnDOT guidance on this slope condition and
safety fence/barrier requirements.
106. The typical section for overall street width provided for Chippewa Road is generally
acceptable but split the northerly should into a 3’ paved area and 3’ of turf, see notes on
plans sheets. The 2’ shoulder adjacent to the trail needs to be 2.0%, the same cross-
slope as the trail.
107. More specific information is needed on the plans pertaining to the depth of
excavations/corrections for the Chippewa Road construction. Based on the soil borings,
show approximate depth of unsuitable soils/excavations. Add note to the effect that the
contractor needs to review the geotechnical report and utilize the recommendations for
construction of the roadway.
108. For the trail relocation along Arrowhead Drive, set trail alignment/location to 1’ from
ROW to provide the maximum boulevard width/separation from the roadway.
109. For the rural/boulevard areas, the City would like to maximize the turf areas between the
trail and road edges. The City will still require a 2’ gravel edge adjacent to the roadway,
but in these areas also show a 2” “topsoil” section over the aggregate edge to allow for
turf growth.
Twinhomes (Northerly Development: C6.1 – 6.6):
110. City design standards require horizontal and vertical curve lengths to meet a 30 MPH
design speed for local/private streets, at minimum. For private roadways the City will
allow a 20 MPH design horizontal curves if signed a such; The minimum horizontal
curve radius for a 20 MPH curve is 96’. In-progress, warning signage should be added
to the signing/striping sheet for the 20 MPH curves.
111. The City may require that a trail corridor is established through the property to connect
to future developments to the north. See City Planner comments.
Single Family (Southerly Development: C6.1 - 6.5):
112. City design standards require horizontal and vertical curve lengths to meet a 30 MPH
design speed for local/private streets, at minimum. For the 30 MPH public streets
(Hillside Lane, Meadowview Ct, Brookview Ct), the minimum horizontal curve radius is
300’ and the minimum vertical curve length is 90’. Complete.
City of Medina – Weston Woods Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review
September 16, 2021
Page 11
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-27 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2021-09-16 Weston Woods Final Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
Standard Details Plans (C7.X)
113. On the typical sections provided, list each street with the proposed street design. For
Chippewa Road include with the typical section where the trail is located and the
appropriate boulevard width and slopes. Complete, but see notes on plan sheet.
114. Confirm street design with the geotechnical analysis. In progress, a report was provided
with a recommended pavement section for the residential areas but did not detail a
specific section for Chippewa Road. Chippewa Road is a collector roadway with the
potential for 5,800 ADT; this 10-ton pavement section will need to be designed with this
in mind by the Geotechnical Engineer.
It should be further noted that the City’s standard pavement sections are intended to set
the minimum design section/standard. If the geotechnical engineer recommends a more
conservative pavement design based on localized conditions, this should be used as the
basis for the pavement section design and incorporated into the typical street sections
for both the residential roadways and Chippewa Road.
115. Provide typical sections for proposed stormwater treatment areas. Complete.
116. Provide specific details for each control structure. Complete.
117. With the typical section for Chippewa Road, show the trail location. Complete.
118. Add detail for casing installation.
119. For each of the three plan sets, only include details within each plan set for work items
associated with that project area.
Traffic & Access
120. The private streets accessing Chippewa Road just east of Mohawk Drive from both the
north and south side need to line up with each other. The street should be located as far
east as possible. In-progress, the applicant is proposing to eliminate the access to the
south (townhomes neighborhood) for use only as a fire access. The road to the north
can then be located further east. Complete.
121. Provide an analysis of all development specific traffic generation including a
determination on whether or not turn lanes will be required on Chippewa Road and/or
Mohawk Drive at the proposed development access points. This specific analysis was
not completed with the City visioning study.
122. Provided a detailed plan (signing/striping plan) showing the required turn lanes at the
intersections of Chippewa Road at Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road at Arrowhead
Drive consistent with the Chippewa Road Visioning Study recommended improvements.
123. Provide safety (sight line) analysis at the site driveways on Chippewa Road, Arrowhead
Drive, and Mohawk Drive. Confirm vertical curves on Hackamore Road and Arrowhead
Drive (both north and south) achieve sight distance design requirements (both vertical
and horizontal).
City of Medina – Weston Woods Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review
September 16, 2021
Page 12
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-27 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2021-09-16 Weston Woods Final Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
Stormwater Management
124. The development will need to meet the appropriate watershed standards and submit for
the required permits. Provide permit to City when complete. In-progress, requesting a
variance for bounce restrictions in wetland 1aS. Further updates were not provided with
final plat submittal.
125. The City requires two feet of freeboard from structure low openings to 100-year high
water levels and EOF’s.
a. Remove all plantings and landscaping from EOF’s and maintenance access
routes. Complete.
b. Clearly label all EOF’s (Bold/Change color) so elevations can be clearly read.
Complete.
c. Freeboard is not met from the 100-yr HWL for lots 19-20, 23-32, Block 8.
Complete.
d. Freeboard is not met from the EOF for lots 71-74, Block 7. Complete.
e. With an EOF elevation of 987.5 for Wetland 1f, freeboard from the EOF is not
met for lot 5, Block 6. Complete.
f. Freeboard is not met from the 100-yr HWL of Pond 20P for Lots 1, 4-6 Block 5.
g. Freeboard is not met from the HWL of Pond 23P for lots 13 and 14.
h. Lowest basement elevation is mislabeled off by 100 on the following:
i. Lots 1-5, Block 6. Complete.
j. 1-3 & 7-10, Block 5. Complete.
k. Freeboard is not met from the 100-yr HWL of Wetland 1e for Lots 19, 20, 23, 24,
25, 26, 27 and 28 block 7. Complete.
l. Label the EOF for lots 1-4, Block 7.
m. Label the EOF for lots 5-7, Block 7
n. Label the HWL for Wetland 1b
o. Label the EOF for Wetland 3
126. Provide and label maintenance access to all ponding facilities. Easement width shall not
be narrower than 20-feet. Clarify access route for Ponds 16P and 15P Complete.
127. The table in the appendix of the SWMP summarizes the 100-yr bounce in the wetlands
from the existing to proposed condition. Bounce from based on wetland classification is
identified in the City of Medina Stormwater Design Manual.
Please add the wetland protection classification to the table in the appendix of the
Stormwater Management Plan.
The bounce restriction is not met for wetland 1aS. Complete.
128. The development will need to meet the City’s volume control requirement. The provided
narrative indicates stormwater ponds 1P and 20P will be constructed for water reuse. A
water reuse design submittal must at a minimum include the following:
· An analysis using the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District Stormwater
Reuse Calculator. Complete.
City of Medina – Weston Woods Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review
September 16, 2021
Page 13
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-27 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2021-09-16 Weston Woods Final Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
· Provide the stage storage tables for Ponds 1P and 20P, for the permanent pool
storage amount, to verify the Estimated reuse storage volume in the calculator.
City requires that 2 feet of the permanent pool from the bottom of the pond be
maintained and not counted towards reuse total. Complete.
· Provide an exhibit of the application areas described at 18.75 acres and 11.79
acres for Pond 1P and Pond 20P respectively. Complete.
· Documentation demonstrating adequacy of soils, storage system, and delivery
system. Complete.
· Provide an Operations and maintenance plan with Final Design documents.
Clarify inspection frequency for wet ponds and & forebays to be inspected
annually for erosion, volunteer vegetation, debris, burrowing, and structural
devices. Include note on sedimentation accumulation every 10 years.
· Pond (20P) should be labeled as Irrigation pond to match 1P.
· Plans show bottom elevation of 975, while stormwater narrative lists bottom of
pond at 974.
- Verify bottom elevation and make sure it is consistent throughout
submittals and modeling.
- Include updated stormwater narrative to verify all calculations
The abstraction summary provided by the applicant summarizes the amount of
impervious for each subwatershed, disconnected impervious credits, and excess buffer
credits resulting in a total abstraction amount for the site. The total amount is 44,467 cf.
The irrigation ponds provide for an abstraction of 296,731 cf which greatly exceeds the
treatment requirement.
129. Portions of the site along Chippewa Drive are proposed to discharge without treatment.
A table has been provided to summarize where existing impervious areas are being
routed to proposed treatment basins and where proposed impervious is routed offsite
without treatment. Please provide a figure showing these areas. Complete.
130. The arrowhead round about needs to be included in the stormwater narrative and
included in the impervious surface calculations. The adjacent development is showing
treatment of 1/3 of the runoff from the proposed roundabout.
131. Coordinate with adjacent development to the east of Arrowhead to ensure 100% of new
impervious associated with the proposed roadway improvements (curve or roundabout)
are being treated.
132. Provide a summary and exhibit showing the floodplain impacts. Filling activities must not
increase the stage of the 100-yr flood. Compensatory storage for any filling in the 100-yr
floodplain shall be at a ratio of 1:1. Label the floodplain elevation for Wetland 1a-North
show impacts resulting from Chippewa Rd. construction, quantify impacts and show
where compensatory storage is being proposed.
DNR/FEMA – see guidance below for filling in Zone A areas. Since the floodplain is
within zone A, 0.5’ rise in HWL is allowed. The current configuration identifies a 0.32’
rise in HWL of wetland 1asP. Complete.
City of Medina – Weston Woods Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review
September 16, 2021
Page 14
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-27 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2021-09-16 Weston Woods Final Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
133. Provide an EOF for Wetland 5a/5b at Short Way Road crossing. A back to back event
has been modeled for this location instead of providing an EOF. Complete.
134. The maximum velocity of storm sewer pipes is 10 fps. Ensure that all pipes are under
10 fps.
135. Maximum velocities into basins should be limited to 6 fps, include modeling to verify
136. Basin 16P is identified as a filtration basin, but the cross-section does not show details
for a Filtration basin, please clarify. Complete.
p. Include Filtration Basin Section with other standard details
q. Show drain tile connection, clean outs
137. For the culvert crossing within the DNR wetland at Chippewa: Complete.
· According to state aid, the multiple pipe crossing is providing enough space between
the pipe openings such that it is not considered a bridge. However, because the size
of the box culverts are greater than 48” a hydraulic analysis and risk assessment is
required. Refer to MNDOT drainage manual Chapter 5.
· Permitting through the DNR will be necessary for installation of structures within the
DNR public water.
138. Provide grading/drainage plans for stormwater pond improvements with the Chippewa
Road plans; these improvements are currently included with the other plans sets.
HydroCAD Modeling:
139. Wetland 1e model information is off by 100. The HWL elevation in the model is reported
as 883.92 and should be 983.92, please correct. Complete.
140. Drainage from properties to the west of Mohawk Drive is conveyed through the
southeasterly portion of the Weston Woods property via the existing creek into the
wetland(s). The stormwater modeling and storm sewer design will need to
accommodate this flow and conveyance. Model Wetland 5a/5b with storage to ensure
proper sizing of the culvert under the roadway and estimate the HWL of this basin area.
Upon further review of wetlands 5a and 5b the city has approved a reduction in the
classification to Manage 2. Manage 2 wetlands are required to maintain bounce at or
below existing condition plus 1.0 feet. This bounce allowance will provide flexibility on
the culvert crossing. It should be noted that crossing spans exceeding 10-feet must
meet state aid bridge requirements. It should also be noted that any structure placed at
this crossing will be place within a DNR public water and must meet DNR requirements.
If the revised site plan proposes box culvert. Details for the box are to be provided.
Modeling should be reflected as a box culvert vs. asymmetrical weir as currently
modeled.
If the ultimate size of the culvert is greater than 48” a risk assessment is required. Refer
to MNDOT drainage manual Chapter 5. Complete.
City of Medina – Weston Woods Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review
September 16, 2021
Page 15
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-27 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2021-09-16 Weston Woods Final Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
Wetlands & Environmental
141. General:
a. Specify the native seed mix to be used to vegetate the upland buffers. Complete.
b. Page L2.1 Landscape Requirements- Tree Replacement identifies 1,720
significant trees on the site with 842 significant trees being removed (49%
significant trees removed). Medina City code 828.41 subd. 6 requires that for
parcels larger than 20 acres during initial site development up to 10% of
significant trees may be removed during initial site development. This would
allow the developer to remove 172 trees without needing to provide tree
replacement. The plan set identifies allowed removal of 15% or 258 trees which
is not correct unless a waiver has been granted. Based on the proposed % of
tree removal the developer will need to provide replacement.
c. Tree replacement is based on caliper measurement, not number of trees. The
applicable ratio is 1 caliper inch of replacement tree to 1 caliper inch of significant
trees lost. The plan identifies the number of trees required (584) and uses the
diameter of the smallest 584 trees, but 828.41 does not have a provision that
allows the use of the smallest diameter trees, rather the sum of the inches of tree
to be removed should be summed and provided.
d. Acceptable trees species list matches the list provided in 828.10. However, it
should be noted in the plans that each of the planted trees will need protection
(fencing/bud caps) to protect from herbivory.
e. One of the tree replacement areas identified in the northeast corner of the
development is also identified as a potential borrow site in Figure 3-site plan of
the EAW document. This may not be conducive to tree planting. Soil
amendments may be necessary prior to planting.
f. The wetlands shown in red in the table below do not meet the city’s buffer
ordinance standards. A variance from the City’s buffer ordinance will be required
if buffers cannot be established that meet the ordinance standards.
Wetland ID Proposed Buffer Width (ft) City-Approved Buffer Width (ft)
WL1a 30-50 50 avg (30 min)
WL1b 35 35 avg (25 min)
WL1c 50 50 avg (30 min)
WL1d 35-50 35 avg (25 min)
WL1e 35-50 35 avg (25 min)
WL1e-1 0 35 avg (25 min)
WL1f 20-35 25 avg (20 min)
WL1g 25-50 35 avg (25 min)
WL1h 25 35 avg (25 min)
WL2 20-25 25 avg (20 min)
WL4 30 30 avg (20 min)
WL5a & b 20-25 25 avg (20 min)
City of Medina – Weston Woods Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review
September 16, 2021
Page 16
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-27 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2021-09-16 Weston Woods Final Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
g. Wetland boundary is shown between WL1a and WL1c, within the tree
preservation area. No wetland exists in this area. Update plans accordingly.
h. Move silt fence outside of WL 1e and WL1d as noted on plans.
142. Chippewa Road Extension
i. Permits for wetland impacts have been received from the WCA LGU and
USACE.
j. Permits for DNR Public Water impacts are under review and must be obtained
prior to construction.
k. Wetland mitigation credits are under contract and must be purchased prior to
construction.
143. Twinhomes (Northerly Development)
l. Permits for wetland impacts have been received.
m. Wetland mitigation credits must be purchased prior to construction
n. Wetland WL1e-1 is not shown on the plans. This wetland was not approved for
impact in the replacement plan. Update the boundaries and buffers accordingly
or amend the replacement plan.
144. Single Family (Southerly Development)
o. Permits for wetland impacts have been received.
p. Wetland mitigation credits must be purchased prior to construction
The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted
plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or
modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards.
We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if
you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet.
Sincerely,
WSB
Jim Stremel, P.E.
City Engineer
October 14, 2021
Mayor and City Council Members
City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340
Re: Weston Woods of Medina - Tree Management Plan and Request for Waiver
Dear Mayor Martin and City Council Members:
This letter is written on behalf of Mark and Kathleen Smith, owners and developers (the
“Developer”) of the above project. In this letter we provide the background regarding significant
tree preservation within the project plans, as well as plans for active tree management going
forward. On this basis, we are requesting a waiver of the remaining tree replacement based on
the requirements of City Code, Section 828.42.
Background
The City Council gave preliminary approval to the planned unit development (PUD) for Weston
Woods of Medina (the “Project”) on January 5, 2021. Approval was conditioned, among other
things, on approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment, final plat and Development
Agreement. The Project was designed to include significant preservation of open space, wetlands
and woodlands by altering the layout of roadways, utilities, stormwater facilities, as well as
developable areas.
The Project includes a combined 73.75 acres of wetland and buffer conservation areas, as well as
a combined 7.91 acres of wooded open space or parks. The 5.1-acre park includes over
300 hardwood trees. Grading is expected to avoid disturbance of about 56.2 acres of wetlands
and waters, 5.8 acres of woodland, and provide about 15 acres of wooded and grassland buffers
along wetland edges.
Gross Area Wetlands/Buffer Parks/Open Space Net Developable
Northerly Parcel 77.35 acres 47.33 acres 2.86 acres 27.16 acres
Southerly Parcel 53.98 acres 26.42 acres 5.05 acres 22.51 acres
Project Total 131.33 acres 73.75 acres 7.91 acres 49.67 acres
Mayor and City Council Members
City of Medina
October 14, 2021
Page 2
Tree Preservation
Woodlands within the Project are dominated by white oak, red oak, and sugar maple, with some
green ash and elm. Some oak and maple trees range over 20 inches in diameter. See Chippewa
Road and Weston Woods Environmental Assessment Worksheet, dated September 10, 2020.
The southern site includes a wooded area of approximately 14 acres. The northern 3-acres of the
woods is designated as a moderate quality oak forest in the City’s land cover classification
system. Approximately 1-2 acres of the southern wooded area is designated as a moderate
quality maple-basswood forest. The remaining area is an altered deciduous woodland.
The City’s natural resource specialist concluded the southern portion of the wooded area,
especially the wooded knoll, which is proposed to be dedicated to the City, contains a variety of
tree age and species, and had comparatively low levels of buckthorn. This portion of the woods
appears to be a sustainable natural area of a comparatively good quality. The dedication of the
property to the City will provide the opportunity to conserve the highest quality portion of the
woodlands. See Report to Planning Commission, dated November 10, 2020.
In addition to preserving open space and buffer areas, the Developer submitted a Tree
Preservation Plan which is summarized here.
Total
Significant
Trees
Total Trees
Removed
Total Trees
Preserved
Trees Added
for Lots and
Buffer yards
Additional
Trees for
Privacy and
Boulevard
Total New
Trees
1,763 619 1,144 418 75 493
Of the total, 77 trees are being removed due to the construction of Chippewa Road and should
not be counted in the Project total. In addition, the preservation plan has focused on the highest
quality trees. For instance, 244 Ash trees, 75 boxelder, and 2 Siberian Elm will be removed,
which are considered lower quality trees. Some cities do not even include these trees in
requirements for preservation.
Request for Waiver
City Code provides that a waiver of the number of trees required to be replaced may be granted
by the City Council. An applicant is eligible for a waiver based upon implementation of the Best
Management Practices listed in Subdivision 8 of Section 828.42.
Accordingly, the Project has or will implement the following Best Management Practices during
design and as a result of construction or roads, utilities and related improvements.
Mayor and City Council Members
City of Medina
October 14, 2021
Page 3
1. Realignment of proposed streets and utilities in order to avoid tree removal.
Response: The Developer has realigned streets, moved stormwater facilities and utilities to
avoid tree removal. For instance, the cul de sac on Leaping Deer Lane was realigned to avoid
significant trees on the wooded point adjacent to the street.
2. Reduction of required street width and increase of street grade up to an eight (8) percent
slope by the city when the applicant can demonstrate that these changes result in tree
preservation.
Response: The Developer has reduced street width to preserve trees.
3. The use of Private Roads in lieu of public streets.
Response: The Developer has included private streets within the Project to preserve trees. As an
example, the design of the streets in the northerly portion of the Project were revised to preserve
trees associated with the farmstead.
4. Variation in street radius and speed design.
Response: The Developer has varied street design to preserve trees. Examples include flipping
the bubble on private streets serving the northerly parcel as noted above.
5. Modified grading plans.
Response: The Developer has modified grading plans to preserve trees. For instance, the
Developer revised plans for Hillside Drive several times to essentially match the existing grade to
preserve trees adjacent to the future park. The same approach was done at the end of Leaping
Deer Lane.
6. Flexible lot lines.
Response: The Developer has reduced and adjusted lot lines in several locations to preserve trees.
7. Alternative utility configurations, such as the use of ejector pumps, force mains, or
revised home elevations to minimize grading.
Response: The Developer has modified building pads, relocated stormwater facilities and
utilities to minimize grading.
8. The use of flexible development standards, such as clustering of homes, in order to
preserve Old Growth Forest Remnants, Significant Trees and open space.
Response: The Developer has clustered residential areas within the development to retain open
space and preserve trees.
Mayor and City Council Members
City of Medina
October 14, 2021
Page 4
9. The preservation of unique and rare Tree species or communities identified in the Natural
Resource Inventory.
Response: The area of park and preserved open spaces contain significant trees identified in the
Natural Resource Inventory.
10. The use of Low Impact Development principles.
Response: All of the management practices discussed in this letter constitute Low Impact
Development principles.
Conclusion
In addition to the utilizing Best Management Practices in the design of the PUD, the Developer
has engaged Steve Nicholson at TreeBiz, LLC, to develop a Tree Management Plan for all trees
preserved on site. This plan will focus on the necessary management of significant trees as
identified in the plan. It is noteworthy that the preservation plan for the project has focused on
the highest quality trees. As explained, more than half of the trees identified for removal are low
quality trees, subject to disease, and often not counted in the inventory of significant trees in
other cities.
As noted above, 77 trees in the inventory provided to the City are being removed due to the
construction of Chippewa Road. These should not be counted in the total since they are part of
the City’s project constructed at the Developer’s expense.
Based upon the significant preservation, replacement and management of the woodlands on the
Project site, we respectfully request waiver of the remaining replacement trees required under the
City Code.
Sincerely,
William C. Griffith, for
Larkin Hoffman
Direct Dial: 952-896-3290
Direct Fax: 952-842-1729
Email: wgriffith@larkinhoffman.com
cc: Dusty Finke, City Planner
Steve Nicoholson, Tree-Biz, LLC
Mark Smith
4829-5717-9390, v. 5
TWINHOMES
Weston Woods Townhomes are spacious, bright, open, and airy with extensive use of
glass in every home creating an abundance of natural light. The design is timeless but
practical with expansive soaring vaults, gourmet kitchens, and a cozy 4 season porch.
The exteriors will feature a variety of defining features and including a side porch
entry, a kitchen garden window, and changing roof lines and bay windows that make
them intriguing and inviting. The exterior facades will feature a variety of finishes,
textures, and features like shake siding and cultured stone on no less than 25% of the
street facing exterior. The rear of the homes will be enhanced by a gable roof that
covers our 4 season porch.. Our homes look and live like single family homes. Most
of these homes will have lower levels that will overlook the vast open space wetlands.
These homes range in size from 2,600 to 3,300 square feet.
ROW TOWNHOME
Like twin homes these homes will feature interesting architecture and design featuring
multiple products that will make them interesting and unique on no less than 25% of
the street facing exterior. The homes will also have varied roof lines and extra roof
features to make the home have their own identity and feel. These homes feature 3
and 4 bedrooms with anywhere from 1,800 to 2,300 square feet.
SINGLE Family
The single family homes will meet or exceed all City requirements. They will
feature interesting and unique facades, roof lines, window features, and accents
that will cover well over 25% of the face of the building. The features will include
stone, shakes, brick, and concrete type siding. Plans will be architecturally
approved prior to building. Efforts will be made to modify rear rooflines or
exteriors to enhance the rear façade.
81
REVISIONS BY
DE
S
I
G
N
a
n
d
D
R
A
F
T
I
N
G
B
Y
:
of
ex
c
e
l
l
e
n
c
e
ho
m
e
s
4
8
MA
R
K
O
F
E
X
C
E
L
L
E
N
C
E
5
8
MA
R
K
O
F
E
X
C
E
L
L
E
N
C
E
6
8
MA
R
K
O
F
E
X
C
E
L
L
E
N
C
E
WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
4
3
2
1
50
49
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
41
37
38
39
40
36 35 34 33
32
31
30
29
28
27
26
25 24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1234
56
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
OUTLOT I
8
INSET A
See sheet 4 of 9 sheets
INSET B
See sheet 5 of 9 sheets
INSET C
See sheet 6 of 9 sheets
WET LAND WET LAND
WET LAND
WET LAND
MATCH LINE
See sheet 3 of 9 sheets
493.55 N89°23'02"W
1979.01 N89°23'02"W
296.29 56.69
R =6 7 4 .0 0 Δ =2 2 °2 1 '0 7 "2 6 2 .9 4
R=521.00 Δ=68°46'44"
625.42
189.5
8
N
6
8
°
1
5
'
5
1
"
E
Δ =2 6 °11 '0 6 "2 8 9 .7 5
698.92
S45
°
3
0
'
0
0
"
W
112
.
4
6
Δ =34°46'40"
R =2 8 0.00
169.96
28
7
.
0
8
N
1
0
°
4
3
'
2
0
"
E
Δ=11°25'53"
R=903.74
180.31
N2
2
°
0
9
'
0
9
"
E
13
8
.
4
0
S00°37'28"W
30.02
R=170.00
Δ=10°06'25"
29.99
53
4
.
3
4
S
1
0
°
4
3
'
5
3
"
W
R=870.89
Δ=11°25'46"
173.73
S22°09'39"W
86.32
51
8
.
9
6
N
0
1
°
1
4
'
2
0
"
E
R=244.93
Δ=8°35'12"
36.71
N17°25'31"W
44.55
R
=
3
9
3
.
6
4
212.95
Δ
=
3
0
°
5
9
'
4
5
"
10
5
.
0
0
85
.
7
2
32
8
.
2
5
34.27
N13°34'14"E
R=1126.89
Δ=0°20'29"
6.72
2676.18 S89°42'49"E 26.21
1766.15850.82
33
.
0
0
Drainage and Utility Easement
over all of OUTLOT I
Drainage and Utility Easement
over all of OUTLOT J
26
4
0
.
4
8
N
0
0
°
2
0
'
4
4
"
W
72.70 157.99
1307.31
CHIPPEWA
ROAD
HA
C
K
A
M
O
R
E
DR
I
V
E
HACKAMORE
DRIVE
33
33 33
33 40
40
5
0
50
50
4
0
OUTLOT A
N. 1/4 corner of
Sec. 3, T. 119, R. 23
Hennepin County Monment
N0
0
°
2
0
'
4
4
"
W
13
3
3
.
4
2
33
N. 1/4 corner of
Sec. 3, T. 119, R. 23
Hennepin County Position
N0
1
°
1
4
'
2
0
"
E
13
5
8
.
8
1
922.00
12
9
6
.
9
4
WET LAND
North line of the south 1/2 of the
northeast 1/4 of Sec. 3, T. 118, R. 23
44
1
.
4
6
51
0
.
9
5
30
33
33
50
WET LAND
51 51
51
51
51
27
27
8
7
7
7
7
7
OU
T
L
O
T
F
OUTLOT G
OUTLOT H
OUTLOT H
OUTLOT I
OUTLOT J
Road easement per Doc.
No's. 8533496 and 8533497
27
8
.
1
9
66
.
3
4
S64°2
5
'
5
3
"
W
109.2
8
244.42
N
7
0
°
5
4
'
1
5
"
E
Δ =65°58'20"657.47
Δ =60°01'52"493.49
5
0
R=20.00
Δ=84°54'13"
29.64
R=714.00
Δ=00°26'34"
5.52
WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
NORTH
0 100 200
468.00
46
8
.
0
0
59
0
.
0
0
MATCH LINE
See sheet 2 of 9 sheets
INSET D
See sheet 7 of 8 sheets
1 2 3 4
1
1
2
3
4
25
6
7
8
9
1
2
33
4
1
2
3
4
5
4
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
45
6
7
8 9
10
1
2
36
5
4
5
OUTLOT E
OUTLOT D
OUTLOT C
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
493.55 S89°23'02"E
14
6
8
.
0
9
S
2
6
°
3
3
'
2
1
"
W
332.51 N88°39'29"W
481
.
8
7
S
3
9
°
2
9
'
2
2
"
W
201.
5
5
N
6
9
°
5
8
'
2
0
"
W
483.
4
8
N
6
9
°
5
8
'
2
0
"
W
N20°01'40"E
5.00
26
4
0
.
4
8
N
0
0
°
2
0
'
4
4
"
W
15
4
.
8
2
N
0
0
°
2
0
'
4
4
"
W
33.01
N88°39'29"W
88.2
7
334.
5
6
60.6
5
12
0
.
8
1
N2
0
°
0
1
'
4
0
"
E
N
2
0
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
W
2
2
4
.
6
5
49.25
2
1
.
2
4
50
.
0
0
46
3
.
8
6
N2
0
°
1
4
'
1
7
"
E
10
8
.
7
7
288
.
8
2
N
5
5
°
1
3
'
4
5
"
E
54
1
.
0
6
N
2
3
°
0
6
'
0
6
"
E
17
3
.
2
1
N
6
5
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
W
61
1
.
0
0
WET LAND
WET LAND
WE
T
L
A
N
D
WET LAND
WET LAND
WET LAND
13
9
.
2
7
DEERLEAPING
BR
O
O
K
V
I
E
W
C
O
U
R
T
DR
I
V
E
HIL
L
S
I
D
E
MO
H
A
W
K
D
R
I
V
E
1979.01 S89°23'02"E
682.05
50.00
541.58
R =7 14 .0 0 Δ =1 9 °1 6 '1 0 "2 4 0 .1 3
73
50
CHIPPEWA ROAD 40
40
3333
3333
17
5
436.07
S89°23'02"E
166.45
E.
1
/
4
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
Se
c
.
3
,
T
.
1
1
9
,
R
.
2
3
He
n
n
e
p
i
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
M
o
n
m
e
n
t
E.
1
/
4
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
Se
c
.
3
,
T
.
1
1
9
,
R
.
2
3
He
n
n
e
p
i
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
M
o
n
m
e
n
t
N89°23'02"W
2649.57
S0
0
°
2
0
'
4
4
"
E
13
0
3
.
7
2
S. 1/4 corner of
Sec. 3, T. 119, R. 23
Hennepin County Monment
INSET E
See sheet 8 of 8 sheets
152.90444.84
131.32 N89°39'16"E
WET LAND
LA
N
E
Ro
a
d
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
p
e
r
Do
c
.
N
o
.
9
3
7
4
4
7
Ro
a
d
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
p
e
r
Do
c
.
N
o
.
9
3
7
4
4
6
Road easement per
Doc. No. 937445
24
4
.
8
6
N
2
9
°
1
3
'
0
9
"
E
197.4
1
N
6
7
°
3
1
'
2
2
"
E
31
6
.
3
3
N
1
°
2
5
'
3
3
"
E
WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
NORTH
0 100 200
SECTION BREAKDOWN DETAIL
N 1/4 Cor.
CIM-HCM
W 1/4 Cor.
CIM-HCM
S 1/4 Cor.
CIM-HCM
E 1/4 Cor.
CIM-HCM
No Scale
SE Cor.
CIM-HCM
OUTLOT I
Drainage and Utility Easement
over all of OUTLOT I
45
4
3
2
1
50
49
48
47
46
76
75
74
73
72
71
70
69
68
67
66 65
64 63
62
61
60
59
58
57
56
55
54
53
52
51
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
WE
T
L
A
N
D
WET LAND
110.00 S89°22'57"W
22
6
.
0
0
N
0
0
°
3
7
'
0
3
"
W
22
6
.
0
0
N
0
0
°
3
7
'
0
3
"
W
110.00 S89°22'57"W
55
.
0
0
58
.
0
0
58
.
0
0
55
.
0
0
55
.
0
0
58
.
0
0
58
.
0
0
55
.
0
0
S89°22'57"W
110.00
S89°22'57"W
110.00
S89°22'57"W
110.00
S89°22'57"W
110.00
S89°22'57"W
110.00
S89°22'57"W
110.00
N89°22'57"E
110.00
S89°22'57"W
110.00
N89°22'58"E
110.84
N89°22'58"E
110.84
N89°22'58"E
110.84
N89°22'58"E
110.84
N89°22'58"E
110.84
N89°22'58"E
110.84
N89°22'58"E
110.00
S1
°
2
5
'
4
4
"
E
88
.
3
2
110.00 S89°22'57"W
114.63
N
7
3
°
0
2
'
4
5
"
E
36
0
.
2
4
N
0
0
°
3
7
'
0
3
"
W
32
8
.
0
0
N
0
0
°
3
7
'
0
3
"
W
55
.
0
0
54
.
5
0
54
.
5
0
54
.
5
0
54
.
5
0
55
.
0
0
55
.
0
0
54
.
5
0
54
.
5
0
54
.
5
0
54
.
5
0
87
.
2
4
N89°39'16"E
71.02
37
1
.
5
1
883.82
43
4
.
4
6
S
0
0
°
3
7
'
0
2
"
E
56
.
2
5
55
.
9
8
58
.
0
2
58
.
0
2
55
.
9
8
57
.
2
7
44
8
.
9
1
S
0
0
°
3
7
'
0
2
"
E
105.38 N89°22'58"E
55
.
3
4
58
.
6
6
50
.
0
0
35.55
58
.
6
6
55
.
3
4
N62°
2
0
'
0
3
"
E
80.26
S5
8
°
2
4
'
0
9
"
E
78
.
4
5
N41
°
5
5
'
2
0
"
E
42.
5
6
2
0
18.64
23
.
3
2
4.2
1
11.52
2
5
.
1
7
N20°03'41"E
15.45
102.90 N89°57'27"E
92
.
3
2
N
0
0
°
0
2
'
3
3
"
W
108.21 N89°57'27"E
N0
°
0
2
'
3
3
"
W
10
6
.
8
3
57
.
3
9
56
.
2
5
N89°22'58"E
110.84
20
110.84 S89°23'31"W
110.84
57
.
3
9
57
.
2
7
47
.
3
4
47
.
3
3
47
.
3
1
47
.
3
5
136.12 N89°22'58"E
26.12 25.2884.72
110.00 N89°22'58"E
10
7
.
3
9
S
0
0
°
3
7
'
0
2
"
E
10
7
.
3
9
S
0
0
°
3
7
'
0
2
"
E
50
.
0
0
57
.
3
9
57
.
3
9
50
.
0
0
175.22 S8
1
°
0
3
'
0
7
"
E
12
3
.
0
7
S
0
0
°
0
2
'
3
3
"
E
16
.
2
4
93
.
7
6
13
.
0
7
N0
°
0
2
'
3
3
"
W
11
0
.
0
0
N1
0
°
0
3
'
2
7
"
E
11
1
.
7
3
N2
0
°
1
4
'
5
7
"
E
11
0
.
0
0
114.08 N89°57'27"E
55.03
S76°1
1
'
3
0
"
E
53.0
0
S69
°
4
5
'
0
3
"
E
110.
6
7
S
6
9
°
4
5
'
0
3
"
E
151.57 N89°57'27"E
58.01 56.07
53.0
0
57.6
7
17.8975.6658.01
11
0
.
0
0
N
2
0
°
1
4
'
5
7
"
E
N88°23'13"E
68.48
110
.
0
0
S
4
8
°
5
7
'
1
2
"
W
1
0
4
.
1
2
N
4
1
°
0
2
'
4
8
"
W
1
1
8
.
7
5
N
4
1
°
4
6
'
4
7
"
W
1
4
0
.
5
1
N
2
6
°
5
3
'
3
8
"
W
1
0
4
.
3
8
N
2
6
°
5
3
'
3
8
"
W
138.74 N87°20'50"E
S48
°
5
7
'
1
2
"
W
110
.
6
4
S56°
2
5
'
2
3
"
W
112.
4
7
S63°0
6
'
2
2
"
W
111.7
1
S74°45'4
1
"
W
114.06
S75°44'5
4
"
W
114.04
S75°44'5
4
"
W
114.04
5
7
.
0
0
5
5
.
5
9
7
3
.
9
5
6
6
.
5
6
6
8
.
7
4
5
0
.
0
0
5
0
.
0
0
5
4
.
1
2
5
3
.
4
7
5
0
.
9
1
5
3
.
6
2
5
7
.
0
0
5
7
.
0
0
5
7
.
0
0
4
6
.
8
5
4
7
.
1
5
4
6
.
9
8
4
7
.
0
2
Drainage and
Utility Easement
Drainage and
Utility Easement
2
0
Drainage and
Utility Easement
S75°44'5
4
"
W
114.04
S75°44'5
4
"
W
110.001
0
6
.
7
0
N
1
4
°
1
5
'
0
6
"
W
110.00 S
7
5
°
4
4
'
5
4
"
W
1
0
6
.
7
0
N
1
4
°
1
5
'
0
6
"
W
123.76 N
7
5
°
4
4
'
5
4
"
E
114.04
9.71
13.76
2
2
4
.
9
2
N
1
4
°
1
5
'
0
6
"
W
2
2
6
.
8
8
N
1
4
°
1
5
'
0
6
"
W
5
7
.
3
0
5
7
.
3
0
5
6
.
7
0
5
0
.
0
0
5
6
.
7
0
5
0
.
0
0
11
0
.
5
6
S
6
4
°
0
0
'
5
2
"
E
1
0
7
.
0
0
S
1
4
°
1
5
'
0
6
"
E
1
1
6
.
5
6
S
1
5
°
0
9
'
0
6
"
E
1
5
0
.
8
1
S
1
5
°
4
6
'
4
1
"
E
1
0
7
.
0
0
S
1
4
°
1
5
'
0
6
"
E
1
7
0
.
3
1
S
1
4
°
3
1
'
5
9
"
E
8
6
.
5
6
S
1
5
°
4
6
'
4
1
"
E
106
.
4
9
S
6
6
°
1
4
'
1
1
"
E
119
.
3
9
N
3
6
°
5
8
'
0
8
"
E
11
3
.
8
8
S
5
8
°
4
1
'
5
4
"
E
1
1
8
.
3
3
S
3
7
°
2
7
'
4
4
"
E
112.47 N
7
5
°
4
4
'
5
4
"
E
24.96 N14°15'06"W
5
0
.
0
0
5
7
.
0
0
5
7
.
0
0
5
0
.
0
0
5
7
.
0
1
5
9
.
5
5
5
6
.
7
2
7
0
.
0
7
2
4
.
0
3
3
5
.
1
8
5
1
.
3
8
5
6
.
3
6
5
6
.
9
5
5
7
.
0
0
N75°44'5
4
"
E
112.47
N75°44'5
4
"
E
112.47
N75°44'5
4
"
E
111.85
N74°24'
4
0
"
E
111.23
N74°13'
1
9
"
E
110.00
N64°3
4
'
5
5
"
E
111.5
8
N52
°
3
2
'
1
6
"
E
105
.
0
0
N42
°
0
9
'
1
2
"
E
106
.
7
5
N3
1
°
1
8
'
0
6
"
E
11
0
.
5
6
4
8
.
1
8
7
0
.
1
5
63
.
3
1
50
.
5
7
62.
9
0
43.
5
9
5
0
.
9
1
1
4
.
5
4
OUTLOT H
315.22 S89°55'16"W
315.22 S89°55'16"W
44
8
.
2
8
S
0
0
°
3
7
'
0
3
"
E
10
7
.
5
6
S
0
0
°
3
7
'
0
3
"
E
25
9
.
3
8
S
0
0
°
3
7
'
0
3
"
E
179.80 S89°22'57"W
66.14 N89°22'57"E 68.45 N79°
2
2
'
5
7
"
E
2
5
0
.
8
2
N
1
4
°
1
5
'
0
6
"
W
2
5
0
.
8
2
N
1
4
°
1
5
'
0
6
"
W
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
66
.
3
4
27
8
.
1
9
51
.
3
4
WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
NORTH
0 50 100
WET LAND
51
7
Drainage and Utility
Easement over all
of Lot 51
WET LAND
44
43
42
41
37
38
39
40
36
35
34 33
32
31
30
29
682.76
58
0
.
5
6
N89°22'57"E
71.02
N62°
2
0
'
0
3
"
E
80.26
114.63
N
7
3
°
0
2
'
4
5
"
E
105.38 N89°22'58"E
92
.
3
2
N
0
0
°
0
2
'
3
3
"
W
108.21 N89°57'27"E
114.08 N89°57'27"E
S76°1
1
'
3
0
"
E
55.03
S69
°
4
5
'
0
3
"
E
53.0
0
13.07
N0°02'33"W
1
0
8
.
6
1
S
1
1
°
4
3
'
1
1
"
E
1
2
1
.
9
7
N
4
3
°
4
3
'
0
5
"
W
1
1
5
.
8
1
S
4
5
°
3
0
'
3
8
"
E
1
2
4
.
6
5
N
2
6
°
2
9
'
3
2
"
W
16
5
.
2
7
S
0
0
°
3
6
'
5
8
"
W
8
1
.
8
7
N
3
1
°
3
9
'
0
3
"
W
9
6
.
5
8
S
5
0
°
1
7
'
0
8
"
E
1
0
0
.
0
0
N
5
4
°
5
3
'
2
6
"
W
1
1
0
.
6
8
N
5
4
°
5
3
'
2
6
"
W
9
8
.
3
1
N
3
1
°
3
9
'
0
3
"
W
91.
6
7
S
3
5
°
0
6
'
3
4
"
W
S58°
2
0
'
5
7
"
W
110.
0
0
S39
°
4
2
'
5
2
"
W
90.
5
2
S35
°
0
6
'
3
4
"
W
91
.
6
7
4
5
.
5
4
5
2
.
7
9
7
8
.
5
7
1
8
.
0
1
50
.
0
0
5
0
.
0
0
95.79 S
7
8
°
5
1
'
3
4
"
E
112.45 S81°2
5
'
3
5
"
W
112.59 N83°11'0
4
"
E
111.19 S81°2
5
'
3
5
"
W
106.15 S83°00'2
6
"
W
94
.
9
5
N
6
0
°
2
8
'
3
2
"
W
82
.
8
7
S
6
0
°
2
8
'
3
2
"
E
9
2
.
0
0
N
4
3
°
4
3
'
0
5
"
W
81.
6
0
S
4
6
°
1
6
'
5
5
"
W
64.5
5
S
6
8
°
3
6
'
5
7
"
E
9
7
.
6
8
S
0
8
°
3
4
'
2
5
"
E
49.71
62.87
62.45
50.00
50.00
61.19
61.13
45.02
50
.
8
7
44
.
0
7
1
2
.
4
5
42
.
0
0
40
.
8
7
22.6
9
41.8
6
17
3
.
4
1
S
0
3
°
0
2
'
4
2
"
E
255.58 S82°42
'
2
4
"
W
94.00 S89°23'02"E
93
.
5
1
S
0
0
°
3
6
'
5
8
"
W
93
.
5
1
S
0
0
°
3
6
'
5
8
"
W
94.00 S89°23'02"E
93
.
5
1
S
0
0
°
3
6
'
5
8
"
W
93
.
5
1
S
0
0
°
3
6
'
5
8
"
W
42
.
0
0
51
.
5
1
51
.
5
1
42
.
0
0
42
.
0
0
51
.
5
1
51
.
5
1
42
.
0
0
20.27
20.27
114.27 S89°23'02"E
73.73
S
8
°
3
4
'
2
5
"
E
9
7
.
6
8
S
7
°
5
0
'
1
1
"
E
9
7
.
6
8
S
6
°
4
8
'
5
6
"
E
9
7
.
4
8
N2
1
°
2
3
'
0
3
"
E
88
.
0
0
S2
9
°
3
1
'
2
8
"
W
90
.
3
3
S46
°
1
6
'
5
5
"
W
96.
6
0
5
0
.
0
0
5
9
.
5
2
4
2
.
0
0
5
0
.
0
0
98.
1
7
S
3
6
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
W
10.
8
7
87.
3
0
OUTLOT G
OU
T
L
O
T
F
OUTLOT J
OUTLOT H
40
40
85.63 N82°00
'
0
0
"
E
85.63 N82°00
'
0
0
"
E
40
40
199.24
13
9
.
7
0
N
0
0
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
E
14
0
.
1
3
S
0
0
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
E
WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
NORTH
0 50 100
WET LAND
WET LAND
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
OUTLOT I
Drainage and Utility Easement
over all of OUTLOT I
16
5
.
2
7
S
0
0
°
3
6
'
5
8
"
W
1
2
4
.
6
5
N
2
6
°
2
9
'
3
2
"
W
1
1
5
.
8
1
S
4
5
°
3
0
'
3
8
"
E
1
2
1
.
9
7
N
4
3
°
4
3
'
0
5
"
W
1
0
8
.
6
1
S
1
1
°
4
3
'
1
1
"
E
11
0
.
0
0
N
2
0
°
1
4
'
5
7
"
E
68.48 N88°23'13"E
110
.
0
0
S
4
8
°
5
7
'
1
2
"
W
138.74 N87°20'50"E
119
.
3
9
N
3
6
°
5
8
'
0
8
"
E
1
0
5
.
8
3
S
5
4
°
0
1
'
5
2
"
E
1
1
8
.
8
6
S
3
1
°
5
6
'
1
0
"
E
1
8
2
.
9
4
S
1
2
°
0
2
'
0
5
"
E
1
0
0
.
6
6
S
0
3
°
4
8
'
1
4
"
E
26
6
.
2
3
S
2
0
°
3
8
'
0
6
"
W
14
6
.
0
6
S
0
0
°
3
6
'
5
8
"
W
27.67
41.3468.66
94.16
S
6
6
°
5
1
'
1
3
"
W
8
4
.
0
0
N
2
6
°
2
9
'
3
2
"
W
96.2
5
N
6
8
°
5
0
'
1
3
"
W
105.
0
0
S
5
7
°
3
7
'
5
4
"
W
1
0
5
.
3
4
S
3
2
°
2
2
'
0
6
"
E
105.
0
0
S
5
7
°
3
7
'
5
4
"
W
138.84
S
7
9
°
0
4
'
2
6
"
E
8
8
.
2
3
N
5
3
°
3
8
'
5
7
"
W
S
3
2
°
2
2
'
0
6
"
E
1
0
5
.
3
4
99
.
2
1
N
0
3
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
E
S2
1
°
0
9
'
4
7
"
W
10
8
.
0
0
S63°3
0
'
2
8
"
W
94.00
100
.
3
6
N
4
3
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
E
96.33 N86°11'46"E
110.00 N86°11'46"E
1
0
0
.
6
6
S
0
3
°
4
8
'
1
4
"
E
296.29
50.0
0
55.0
0
55.0
0
50.0
0
21
.
8
0
77
.
4
1
61.56
77.28
4
7
.
5
0
7
7
.
1
6
4
2
.
0
0
4
2
.
0
0
51.
1
3
45.1
2
8.9
1
91.
4
5
1
1
2
.
7
6
S
1
2
°
0
2
'
0
5
"
E
1
0
3
.
1
3
S
3
1
°
5
6
'
1
0
"
E
1
0
0
.
5
2
S
5
4
°
0
1
'
5
2
"
E
N86°11'46"E
110.00
N77°57'55
"
E
95.34
N64°0
0
'
0
0
"
E
98.24
N58°
0
3
'
5
0
"
E
108.
8
4
N39
°
3
7
'
1
3
"
E
114
.
7
3
N35
°
5
8
'
0
8
"
E
114
.
5
0
7
1
.
5
5
7
8
.
7
1
3
2
.
6
8
3
2
.
9
0
8
5
.
9
6
5
4
.
3
2
5
1
.
5
1
5
3
.
5
1
4
7
.
0
1
4
9
.
6
7
5
3
.
4
6
5
5
.
0
0
5
7
.
7
6
5
5
.
6
6
4
5
.
0
0
4
5
.
0
0
5
5
.
6
6
114
.
5
2
4.8
7
OUTLOT H
WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
NORTH
0 50 100
C
O
U
R
T
1
2
3
4
2
5
6
7
8
9
219
.
9
6
N
5
2
°
0
2
'
2
2
"
E
2
8
1
.
2
5
S
5
3
°
4
8
'
4
0
"
E
1
5
0
.
0
5
N
2
3
°
0
8
'
5
2
"
W
132
.
7
9
S
4
8
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
W
188.5
4
N
6
5
°
3
5
'
2
4
"
E
135.
1
0
S
7
0
°
3
0
'
3
1
"
E
1
6
1
.
8
7
N
5
3
°
4
8
'
4
0
"
W
14
5
.
5
9
N
0
0
°
3
6
'
5
8
"
E
421.17 S89°23'02"E
S
5
3
°
4
8
'
4
0
"
E
8
2
.
3
4
N36
°
1
1
'
2
0
"
E
135
.
0
0
S66°5
1
'
0
8
"
W
160.3
8
N69
°
1
2
'
5
3
"
W
179.
7
6
N
2
4
°
2
4
'
3
6
"
W
1
3
5
.
0
0
N2
1
°
3
6
'
4
5
"
E
14
8
.
6
7
N36
°
1
1
'
2
0
"
E
187
.
2
5
N2
8
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
E
18
8
.
9
2
N36
°
1
1
'
2
0
"
E
165
.
1
8
R=227.00 Δ=35°34'21"140.93
Δ=31°33'53"138.83
Δ =19°22'21"
68.30
Δ=16°12'00"
57.11
73.67
66.87
5
7
.
7
6
6
0
.
8
8
4
3
.
2
2
62.8
5
72.2
5
98.10
90.44
82.3
6
50.4
3
1
3
7
.
3
4
7
5
.
0
0
6
8
.
9
1
9.
2
3
20.
0
0
S6
3
°
4
2
'
5
6
"
E
63.
1
4
S
4
0
°
2
0
'
3
2
"
E
4
2
.
9
3
N27
°
5
0
'
2
5
"
E
10.1
1
10
10
1
0
10
1
0
1
0
1
0
10
10
10
10
10
66.
7
6
1
9
.
5
6
Δ=
0
4
°
0
0
'
2
8
"
17
.
6
3
Δ=5
5
°
1
3
'
5
9
"
5
7.
8
4
Δ=43°
5
5
'
5
9
"
46.
0
1
Δ =4 4 °
4 8'17"
4 6 .9 2
Δ=46°0 1 '2 1 "
48.19
Δ
=
6
7
°3
2'3
6"
7
0
.
7
3
1
2
.
0
9
R=2
8
.
0
0
Δ=5
2
°
5
8
'
0
2
"
25.
8
8
Δ=
2
8
°
2
3
'
5
1
"
29
.
7
4
S
1
6
°
4
6
'
4
2
"
E
6
0
.
0
0
S89°09'21"W
60.00
R =6 0 .0 0 Δ =2 8 5°56'04"
2
9
9
.
4
312.09
21.36
Δ=43°43'00"
R=28.00
Δ
=
4
3
°
4
3
'
0
0
"
2
1
.
3
6
Drainage and
Utility Easement
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
a
n
d
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
25
25
25
25
25
25
456.82 S89°23'02"E
76.0076.0076.0094.5025.0025.0084.32
142
.
3
2
2
1
.
3
1
59
.
0
1
75
.
0
0
80
.
0
0
61
.
4
6
32
.
5
1
90
.
6
8
90
.
0
0
199.30130.00
163
.
6
3
S
4
2
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
W
13
4
.
0
1
N
0
0
°
3
6
'
5
8
"
E
7
6
.
9
8
S
1
2
°
2
3
'
4
7
"
E
8
9
.
8
7
S
3
2
°
4
9
'
0
7
"
E
118.13 S89°23'02"E
144.
9
0
S
7
1
°
2
8
'
0
5
"
E
14
1
.
4
6
N
1
8
°
3
1
'
5
5
"
E
21
3
.
1
9
N
0
0
°
3
6
'
5
8
"
E
R=403.00
Δ=24°23'02"
171.51
33
1
.
7
8
S
0
0
°
3
6
'
5
8
"
W
12
2
.
3
8
20
9
.
4
1
75
.
0
0
75
.
0
0
75
.
0
0
10
6
.
7
8
Δ=11°26
'
39
"
75.50
Δ=12°56'23"
85.37
S89°23'02"E
175.16
S89°23'02"E
192.49
S89°23'02"E
192.49
S89°23'02"E
178.41
20
20
10
10
1
0
1
0
MEADOWVIEW
1 2 3 4
1
5
4
3
2
1
6
1
2
3
4
3
94.50 76.00 76.00 76.00
18
4
.
4
1
N
0
0
°
3
6
'
5
8
"
E
18
4
.
4
1
N0
0
°
3
6
'
5
8
"
E
18
4
.
4
1
N0
0
°
3
6
'
5
8
"
E
18
4
.
4
1
N0
0
°
3
6
'
5
8
"
E
18
4
.
4
1
50.
0
0
N6
5
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
W
25.
0
0
25.
0
0
N71°
2
8
'
0
5
"
W
138.
5
7
S80°53'35
"
E
136.18
S89°23'02"E
130.00
Δ=06°28'06"
48.32
Δ=09°25'30"
70.40
Δ
=08°2
9
'
2
6
"
63.4
3
31.99
S25°00'00"W
7.
3
8
90
.
0
0
10
10
10
10
10
20
20
20
25
WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
NORTH
0 50 100
INSET D
Δ =0 5 °2 6 '
0
3
"
5 3 .8 7
S6
5
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
E
24
.
8
3
8
1
2
3
4
5
4
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
7
8 9
10
5
BR
O
O
K
V
I
E
W
C
O
U
R
T
LA
N
E
HIL
L
S
I
D
E
6
25
.
0
0
25
.
0
0
70.48 90.31
160.79
160.79 N89°39'16"E
32
2
.
3
3
N
2
5
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
E
93
.
2
3
22
9
.
1
1
25.
0
0
25.
0
0
R =5 9 3.0 0 Δ =2 4°1 4'5 0"
2 5 0.95
R =2 5 3 .0 0 Δ =4 0 °2 4 '2 6 "1 7 8 .4 3
N49
°
1
4
'
5
0
"
E
63.5
0
1
4
1
.
0
5
S
2
0
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
E
117.07 N86°56'28"E
110.56
N
7
0
°
3
2
'
2
9
"
E
108.
2
5
N
5
6
°
1
5
'
5
4
"
E
78.4
0
N
4
9
°
0
4
'
1
1
"
E
90.
9
6
N
4
4
°
1
8
'
5
3
"
E
91.
1
1
N
3
8
°
3
7
'
0
1
"
E
91
.
1
2
N
2
9
°
2
5
'
1
3
"
E
23
4
.
4
6
N
2
5
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
E
132
.
0
0
S
6
5
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
E
S
1
0
°
4
2
'
1
0
"
E
1
3
4
.
0
0
S
2
6
°
0
9
'
3
7
"
E
1
3
2
.
0
0
S
4
0
°
4
5
'
1
0
"
E
1
3
2
.
0
0
S
4
2
°
1
2
'
3
1
"
E
1
3
2
.
0
0
S
4
9
°
0
9
'
4
3
"
E
1
3
2
.
0
0
S
5
6
°
0
6
'
5
5
"
E
13
4
.
0
0
S6
3
°
0
4
'
0
7
"
E
13
2
.
4
3
S6
5
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
E
13
2
.
0
0
S6
5
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
E
13
2
.
0
0
79
.
4
6
75
.
0
0
80
.
0
0
Δ =1 5 °2 7 '2 7 "7 5 .0 0
Δ =10 °2 1'2 6 "
5 0 .2 5
Δ =1 4 °3 5 '3 4 "
7 0 .8 0
15.70
Δ=1°27'20"
Δ =6
°5 7'1 2 "
7 5 .
0
0
Δ =6 °5 7'1 2"
7 5.0 0
Δ =6°57'12"
75.00
54
.
1
7
75
.
0
0
80
.
0
0
20.83
Δ=1°55'53"
4.
2
0
59.3
0
15
15
15
15
1
5
1
5
1
5
1
5
1
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
101
0
1
0
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
0
1
0
1
0
10
S6
5
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
E
50.
0
0
S
4
8
°
1
4
'
4
3
"
E
4
2
.
0
3
1
4
2
.
2
5
S
3
8
°
3
1
'
0
1
"
E
52.
9
8
S
6
2
°
4
1
'
2
1
"
E
103.84 N7
8
°
0
2
'
3
0
"
E
86.
8
9
N
3
7
°
4
9
'
1
0
"
E
72
.
5
3
N
1
8
°
2
6
'
5
3
"
E
84
.
9
8
N
5
°
5
5
'
1
3
"
E
8
7
.
7
5
S
5
°
0
5
'
5
2
"
E
1
0
8
.
8
9
S
5
2
°
3
4
'
2
5
"
E
N40
°
0
5
'
5
9
"
E
57.
3
8
67.9
8
N
4
7
°
3
4
'
0
8
"
E
64.3
7
S
5
2
°
2
4
'
0
5
"
W
1
2
5
.
0
0
S
2
5
°
4
1
'
0
1
"
E
27.57
S69°31'49"E
128.
8
4
S
6
9
°
3
1
'
4
9
"
E
65.1
4
91.2
6
6
9
.
8
6
3
9
.
0
3
4
7
.
4
3
9
4
.
8
3
S2
5
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
W
13
4
.
9
2
N2
°
1
6
'
1
1
"
E
17
4
.
1
3
N
4
5
°
1
9
'
3
7
"
W
1
4
4
.
5
2
S86°54'44"W
117.41
S39
°
1
6
'
5
1
"
W
120
.
0
0
N2
5
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
E
15
0
.
0
0
S
4
6
°
1
1
'
1
4
"
E
1
2
5
.
0
0
S
4
0
°
4
5
'
1
0
"
E
1
2
5
.
0
0
68
.
2
3
Δ =07°49'12"
77.52
Δ =1 0 °5 9'3 4 "1 0 8.9 8
Δ =1 5 °0 4 '0 9 "
5 9 .9 7
Δ =2 5 °2 0 '1 7 "1 0 0 .8 3
37.5
0
26.0
0
20
4
.
1
1
83.
7
8
83.
7
8
Δ=66°30'3 6 "
69.65
Δ
=
4
7
°
4
4
'
4
7
"
5
0
.
0
0
Δ
=47°44'4 7"
50.00
Δ =4 7 °4 4 '4 7 "
5 0 .0 0
Δ=74°5
4'3
8
"
78.4
5
R=30.00
Δ=52°19'48"
27.40
R
=
6
0
.
0
0
Δ
=284°3 9'3 7 "2 9 8 .1 0
R=
3
0
.
0
0
Δ=
2
4
°
3
4
'
3
8
"
12
.
8
7
R=30.0
0
Δ=27°
4
5
'
1
0
"
14.53
90
.
7
9
11
3
.
1
6
N0
°
2
0
'
4
4
"
W
50
.
0
0
N77°19'4
8
"
E
60.00
6
0
.
0
0
N
2
7
°
1
9
'
4
8
"
W
180
.
0
2
N
6
5
°
0
0
'
0
0
"
W
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
2
5
2
5
WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
NORTH
0 50 100
INSET E
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
NORTH
NO SCALE
AREA LOCATION MAP
SITE
HORSESHOE TRAIL
RO
L
L
I
N
G
H
I
L
L
S
R
D
.
ABBREVIATIONS
MODULAR RETAINING WALL
FIELDSTONE RETAINING WALL
NEW
CATV UNDERGROUND CABLE/TV
EXISTING DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
STORM SEWER
WATERMAIN
FORCE MAIN
SANITARY SEWER-WASTE
ROOF DRAIN SYSTEM
GAS LINE-UNDERGROUND
FIRE LINE (IF SEPARATE)
FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION
SOIL SUBDRAIN
TELEPHONE-UNDERGROUND
ELECTRIC-UNDERGROUND
LAWN SPRINKLER SLEEVE
>
>
>>
RIPRAP
>>
FM
STS
RD
GATE VALVE
WTR
SAN
BLDG.
FIRE
GAS
HYD
TELE
ELEC
X"SSD
LSS
C.O.
MAJOR CONTOUR
BUILDING
SPOT ELEVATION
120
CONCRETE
SLOPE DIRECTION
CONCRETE CURB
GUARD RAIL
FENCING
CONCRETE RETAINING WALL
HEIGHT, TYPE
POWER POLE
LIGHT STANDARD
EXIT LOCATION
UNDERGROUND STRUCTURE
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
BOLLARD
CANOPY/OVERHANG
BIT. EDGE
FES
CATCH BASIN
MANHOLE
SYMBOLS
LANDSCAPING
GRAVEL
FLAG POLE
>
>>
POWERPOLE
GUARD POST
GAS METER
TREES
TRAFFIC SIGN
WATER MAIN
SANITARY SEWER LINE
STORM SEWER LINE
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
MAJOR CONTOUR
SPOT ELEVATION
CONCRETE
BUILDING
CANOPY / OVERHANG
120
GM
12"STS
8"SAN
LT
FENCING
CONCRETE CURB
RETAINING WALL
OE
MANHOLE
WATER VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
FLARED END SECTION
CATCH BASIN
6"WTR
XX
HEIGHT, TYPE
1 NOTE NUMBER
GUY WIRE
IRON MONUMENT FOUND
WATER SHUT-OFF VALVE
l l
MEASURED DISTANCE
DISTANCE PER RECORDED PLAT
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONEUT
UNDERGROUND ELECTRICUE
GAS LINEG
PAVING BLOCK
PAVING BLOCK
SET 1/2" X 14" IRON PIPE
TRANSFORMER
TREE LINE
MB
MAILBOX
SURVEY DISK (BENCHMARK)
WSO
BITUMINOUS
SOIL BORING
B-X
123.45
%1.00
234.5
LIGHT POLE
MINOR CONTOUR123MINOR CONTOUR123
SILT FENCE
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
REVISED AREA (THIS ISSUE)
REVISION - ADDENDUM, BULLETIN, ETC.
NOTE REFERENCE
LARGE SHEET DETAIL
COORDINATE POINT
PARKING STALL COUNT
DESCRIPTIONSYMBOL
EROSION CONTROL SYMBOLS
DRAWING SYMBOLS
n n n
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BENCHMARK
INLET PROTECTION
C21
C7.3
1
12
2
GSID Station # 10300 USGS Quad: HAMEL County: HENNEPIN, MN Mn/DOT Name: 2722 T Stamping: 2722 T 1977
Monument Type: SURVEY DISK Disk Type: ALUMINUM ALLOY ROD (NO SLEEVE) (DEPTH 8 FT)
Directions:
2.5 MILES WEST OF HAMEL, 2.4 MILES WEST ALONG TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 FROM THE JUNCTION OF TRUNK HIGHWAY 55
AND COUNTY ROAD 101 IN HAMEL, AT TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 MILEPOINT 174, 73.0 FEET NORTH OF TRUNK HIGHWAY 55,
166.0 FEET EAST OF MOHAWK DRIVE, 27.0 FEET SOUTHWEST OF A POWER POLE WITH GUY WIRE, 26.0 FEET SOUTH OF A
FENCE LINE, 1.0 FOOT SOUTH OF A WITNESS POST.
That part of the South Half of Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying
Northwesterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 01 degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds
East on an assumed bearing along the east line of South half a distance of 833.09 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be
described; thence South 22 degrees 09 minutes 09 seconds West a distance of 86.32 feet; thence Southerly 173. 73 feet along a
tangential curve concave southeasterly, having a central angle of 11 degrees 25 minutes 46 seconds and a radius of 870. 89 feet;
thence South 10 degrees 43 minutes 23 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 534.34 feet; thence southerly 29. 99 feet
along a tangential curve concave easterly, having a central angle of 10 degrees 06 minutes 25 seconds and a radius of 170.1 feet;
thence South 00 degrees 36 minutes 58 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 30.00 feet to the south line of said South
Half and said line there terminating.
Abstract property
AND
Parcel1:
The Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23, except the West 468
feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 2:
That part of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter lying West of a line extending from the Southwest
corner of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter to a point on the North line of the Northeast quarter of the
Southeast quarter 660 feet West along said North line from the Northeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the
Southeast quarter, all in Section 3, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property.
Parcel 3:
Outlot B, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Abstract property
Parcel 4:
The North 468 feet of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township
118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 5:
The West 468 feet of the South 590 feet of the North 1058 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter
of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 6:
That part of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North,
Range 23, lying South of the North 1058 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
3
DESCRIPTIONSHEET NO.
CIVIL & LANDSCAPE TITLE SHEET
EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL-IMPORT STOCKPILE
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL ENLARGED DETAILS
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL ENLARGED DETAILS
MN SWPPP NOTES
UTILITY SCHEMATIC /UTILITY NOTES
SERVICES & STORM SCHEDULE
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN
WATERMAIN
STORM SEWER
STORM SEWER
STORM SEWER
STORM SEWER
STREET PROFILES
ENTRANCE ROAD & CUL-DE-SAC
STREET PROFILE LOOP ROAD - SW
STREET PROFILE LOOP ROAD - SE
STREET PROFILE LOOP ROAD - NE
STREET PROFILE LOOP ROAD - NW
LIGHTING & SIGNAGE PLAN
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURES
MNDOT PED. RAMP DETAILS
MNDOT PED. RAMP DETAILS
LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH
LANDSCAPE DETAILS
CERTIFICATIONS
CIVIL / LANDSCAPE SHEET INDEX & REVISION MATRIX
OWNER
C0.1
C1.1
C3.0
C3.1
C3.2
C3.3
C3.4
C3.5
C4.0
C4.1
C4.2
C4.3
C4.4
C4.5
C5.1
C5.2
C5.3
C5.4
C6.1
C6.2
C6.3
C6.4
C6.5
C6.6
C7.1
C7.2
C7.3
C7.4
C7.5
C7.6
C7.7
C7.8
L2.1
L7.1
PROJECT CONTACTS
10
.
0
7
.
2
1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
SHEETS ISSUED BY DATE
COMPOST/BIO LOG))))))))))))))))))))
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CERTIFICATION IS FOR ALL SHEETS WITH NUMBERS BEGINNING WITH THE LETTER "C".
RANDALL C HEDLUND, P.E.
LICENSE NUMBER:DATE:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CERTIFICATION IS FOR ALL SHEETS WITH NUMBERS BEGINNING WITH THE LETTER "L".
JOSHUA K. POPEHN, L.L.A.
LICENSE NUMBER:DATE:
19576 XX XXX 2021
44803 XX XXX 2021
D Angle
&And
@ At
100 YR.100 Year Flood Elevation
A.B.Anchor Bolt
A.D.Area Drain
A/C Air Conditioning Unit
ADD.Addendum
ADDL.Additional
ADJ.Adjacent / Adjust
AHU Air Handling Unit
ALT.Alternate
ALUM.Aluminum
ANOD.Anodized
APPROX.Approximate
ARCH Architect / Architectural
AUTO.Automatic
AVG.Average
B.C.Back of Curb
B/W Bottom of Wall
BFE Basement Floor Elevation
BIT Bituminous (Asphaltic)
BLDG Building
BM Benchmark
BSMT.Basement
C.F.Cubic Feet
C.F.S.Cubic Feet Per Second
C.G.Corner Guard
C.J.Control Joint
C.L.Centerline
C.M.U.Concrete Masonry Unit
C.O.Cleanout
C.O.E.U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers
C.Y.Cubic Yards
CB Catch Basin
CBMH Catch Basin Manhole
CEM.Cement
CIP Cast Iron Pipe
CMP Corrugated Metal Pipe
CONC.Concrete (Portland)
CONN.Connection
CONST.Construction
CONT.Continuous
CONTR.Contractor
COP.Copper
CU.Cubic
D.S.Down Spout
DEG.Degree
DEMO.Demolition / Demolish
DEPT.Department
DET.Detail
DIA.Diameter
DIAG.Diagonal
DIM.Dimension
DIP Ductile Iron Pipe
DN Down
DWG.Drawing
E.East
E.J.Expansion Joint
E.O.Emergency Overflow
E.O.S.Emergency Overflow Swale
E.W.Each Way
EA.Each EL.Elevation
ELEC.Electrical
ELEV.Elevation
EMER.Emergency
ENGR.Engineer
ENTR.Entrance
EQ.Equal
EQUIP.Equipment
EQUIV.Equivalent
EXIST.Existing
EXP.Expansion
F & I Furnish and Install
F.B.O.Furnished by Others
F.C.Face of Curb
F.D.Floor Drain
F.D.C.Fire Department Connection
F.V.Field Verify
FB Full Basement
FBWO Full Basement Walk Out
FBLO Full Basement Look Out
FDN.Foundation
FES Flared End Section
FFE Finished Floor Elevation
FLR.Floor
FT. OR (')Foot
FUT.Future
G.B.Grade Break
G.C.General Contractor
GAL.Gallon
GALV.Galvanized
GFE Garage Floor Elevation
GL.Glass
GR.Grade
H.Height
H.P.High Point
HDPEP High Density Polyethylene Pipe
HGT.Height
HORIZ.Horizontal
HVAC Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning
HYD Hydrant
I.D.Inside Dimension OR Identification
I.E. or IE Invert Elevation
IN. OR (")Inches
INFO.Information
INL.Inlet Elevation
INSUL.Insulation
INV.Invert Elevation
JT.Joint
L.F.Linear Feet
L.P.Low Point / Liquid Petroleum
LB.Pound
LGU Local Government Unit
LB.Pound
LB.Longitudinal
LT.Light / Lighting
MAINT.Maintenance
MAS.Masonry
MATL.Material
MAX.Maximum
MECH Mechanical
MED.Medium
MFR.Manufacturer
MH Manhole
MIN.Minimum / Minute
MISC.Miscellaneous
MNDOT Minnesota Department Of Transportation
MOD.Module / Modular
MUL.Mullion
N.North
N.I.C.Not In Contract
NO. OR #Number
NOM Nominal
NTS Not to Scale
NWE Normal Water Elevation
NWL Normal Water Level
O.F.On Center
O.G.Outside Dimension
O.H.Overhead Electric
OH.Overhead
OHWL Ordinary High Water Level
OPNG.Opening
ORIG.Original
P.C.Point of Curvature
P.I.Point of Intersection
PIV Post Indicator Valve
P.L. OR P/L Property Line
P.O.B.Point of Beginning
P.S.F.Pounds Per Square Foot
P.S.I.Pounds Per Square Inch
P.T.Point of Tangency
P.V.C.Point of Vertical Curvature
P.V.I.Point of Vertical Intersection
P.V.T.Point of Vertical Tangency
PE Polyethylene
PED.Pedestal / Pedestrian
PERF.Perforated
PREP.Preparation
PROJ.Project
PROP.Proposed
PVC Poly-Vinyl-Chloride (Piping)
PVMT.Pavement
QTR.Quarter
QTY.Quantity
R Radius
RAD.Radius
RE Rim Elevation (Casting)
R.D.Roof Drain
R.E.Remove Existing
R.O.Rough Opening
R.P.Radius Point
RC Reinforced Concrete Pipe
R.S.Rough Slab
RSD Roof Storm Drain
RE.Regarding
REINF.Reinforced
REQ'D Required
REV.Revision / Revised
RGU Regulatory Government Unit
ROW OR R/W Right of Way
S.South
S.F.Square Feet
SAN.Sanitary Sewer
SECT.Section
SE Split Entry /Side Exit
SEWO Split Entry Walk Out /Side Exit Walk Out
SHT.Sheet
SIM.Similar
SLNT.Sealant
SPEC.Specification
SQ.Square
SSD Subsurface drain
STMH Storm Sewer Manhole
STD.Standard
STRUCT.Structural
SYM.Symmetrical
T Thickness
T/R Top of Rim
T/W Top of Wall
TEMP.Temporary
THK.Thick / Thickness
T.J.Tooled Joint
TNH Top Nut Hydrant
TYP.Typical
U.N.O.Unless Noted Otherwise
V.B.Vapor Barrier
V.C.Vertical Curve
V.I.F.Verify In Field
VER.Verify
VER.Vertical
VEST.Vestibule
W Width
W.PT.Working Point
W.W.F.Welded Wire Fabric
W/With
W/O Without
WO Walk Out
VER.Wetland
WP Waterproof
WETL.Weight
YD.Yard
YR.Year
UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTICFO
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL
REV.PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 09.14.21
CNC
RCH
2021-08-16
2021-10-08
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA NORTH
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
10.07.2021
MEH17003
20
2
1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
10
50
55
MO
H
A
W
K
RO
A
D
HACKMORE RD.
B
A
S
S
LA
K
E
RD
.
HAMEL ROAD
PI
N
T
O
D
R
.
S
E
T
T
L
E
R
S
R
D
.
OL
D
AR
R
O
W
H
E
A
D
D
R
I
V
E
55
101
19
116
47
115
C001MEH003.dwg
CIVIL & LANDSCAPE
TITLE SHEET
C0.1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
CONTACT: MARK SMITH
LANDFORM
105 SOUTH FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 513
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
TEL 612-252-9070
FAX 612-252-9077
CONTACT: TODD OLIN
CIVIL ENGINEER
LANDFORM
105 SOUTH FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 513
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
TEL 612-252-9070
FAX 612-252-9077
CONTACT: LARRY HUHN
SURVEYOR
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
DR
I
V
E
CHIPPEWA
ROAD
WI
L
L
O
W
X
X
X
(NORTH OF CHIPPAWA)
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
SITE BENCHMARK
1.TOP NUT HYDRANT, 725 FEET ± FROM THE CENTERLINES INTERSECTION OF THE WESTBOUND LANE OF TRUNK
HIGHWAY NO. 55 AND MOHAWK DRIVE. WEST SIDE OF MOWHAWK DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 998.180
2.TOP NUT HYDRANT, NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF CHIPPAWA ROAD AND HACKAMORE DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 1007.372
LANDFORM
105 SOUTH FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 513
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
TEL 612-252-9070
FAX 612-252-9077
CONTACT: JOSH POPEHN
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
X
CABX
INV=989.61
INV CMP 12
HH
INV=988.56
INV CMP 15 TO STMH
INV=990.15
FES 15 RCP
INV=990.82
FES 15 RCP
INV=984.32
INV CMP 24
CABXINV=984.25
INV CMP 24
CB RECT
RE=991.1INV=988.16
INV E RCP 15INV=988.16
INV CMP 15
INV=987.80
CMP 12IN INV
INV=988.08
CMP 12IN INV
W
SSMH
RE=1005.5
IE=974.93
INV=1003.07
INV 12IN HDPE CPP
INV=1001.95
INV 12IN HDPE CPP
SSMH
RE=996.8
IE=975.43
SSMH
RE=989.8
IE=976.44
INV=984.36
INV 27 RCP
INV=982.56
INV 27IN RCP
SSMH
RE=988.8
IE=977.27
SSMH
RE=992.6
IE=978.44
INV=984.16
FES 18IN RCP
CBMH CL
RE=992.2
INV=990.14
FES 15IN RCP
UE
UE
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
>
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>
I
I
EX. MH 4A
RIM:982.74
INV:979.88(N)
INV:979.88(E)
INV:979.78(S)
28' L 8" PVC
SDR 26 @ 0.4%
STUB 4C
INV:979.88
EX. MH 3
RIM:990.71
INV:979.25(N)
INV:979.25(W)
INV:979.25(E)
INV:979.15(S)
28' L 8" PVC
SDR 26 @ 0.4%
STUB 4C
INV:979.36
EX. MH 2
RIM:987.30
INV:978.20(N)
INV:978.20(E)
INV:978.10(S)
EX. MH 1
RIM:986.42
INV:977.20(N)
INV:977.20(E)
INV:977.10(S)
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:992.55
INV:976.35
29' L 8" PVC
SDR 26 @ 0.4%
STUB 4C
INV:977.32
29' L 8" PVC
SDR 26 @ 0.4%
STUB 4C
INV:978.31
I
WE
T
L
A
N
D
2
33 33
3333
3333
33
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
e
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
d
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
b
NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3
DNR WETLAND 27-493W
NORTH PORTION
OHW = 978.3
FLOODPLAIN = 979.2
( As of 8/10/20)
980.6
98
0
.
6
980.6
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1c
WL 1e-1
WL 3
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1f
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1a
-
N
o
r
t
h
WL
1d-1
WL
1d
-
2
INV? CRUSHED 24 CMP
982.7
INV 24 CMP - CRUSHED
983.4
INV=990.47
FES 15 IN PVC
INV=990.09
FES RCP 15 IN
RE=992.02
STMH
INV=1004.06
INV CMP 15 IN
10
"
P
V
C
8"
P
V
C
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10
"
P
V
C
8"
P
V
C
8" PVC
8" PVC 8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
87
.
5
E
O
F 88.1
88
.
1
88.1
88.1
8
8
.
1
98
6
.
2
98
6
.
2
9
8
6
.
2
98
6
.
2
98
6
.
2
86
.
0
EOF
86.1
EOF
986
.
6
986
.
6
9
8
6
.
6
986.6
98
8
.
2
98
8
.
5
TW=998.0
BW=996.5
TW=998.0
BW=997.0
TW=992.0
BW=988.5
TW=992.0
BW=988.0
TW=990.5
BW=988.0
4
10
12
N89°42'49"W 2676.18
N0
1
°
1
4
'
2
0
"
E
5
1
8
.
9
6
L=173.73
R=870.89
Δ=11°25'46"
S1
0
°
4
3
'
5
3
"
W
5
3
4
.
3
4
L=29.99
R=170.00
Δ=10°06'25"
30.02
S00°37'28"WS89°23'02"E 493.55
S0
0
°
2
0
'
4
4
"
E
2
6
4
0
.
4
8
Existing Road
Easement
ST-1
EL=990.6
ST-2
EL=990.4
ST-3
EL=987.4
ST-4
EL=983.8
ST-5
EL=982.2
ST-8
EL=986.2
ST-9
EL=981.2
ST-10
EL=981.7
ST-6
EL=984.8
ST-7
EL=983.7
ST-17
EL=982.1
ST-18
EL=982.9
ST-19
EL=983.8
ST-20
EL=982.6
ST-21
EL=982.6
ST-22
EL=985.8
BENCHMARK
TNH=1007.372
9
9
CULVERT
NOTE:
EXISTING HOUSE, DECK AND OUTBUILDINGS
HAVE BEEN DEMOLISHED.
WELL HAS BEEN CAPPED.
SEPTIC AND BEEN PUMPED AND CRUSHED.
NORTH
0 150 300
That part of the South Half of Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying
Northwesterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 01 degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds
East on an assumed bearing along the east line of South half a distance of 833.09 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be
described; thence South 22 degrees 09 minutes 09 seconds West a distance of 86.32 feet; thence Southerly 173. 73 feet along a
tangential curve concave southeasterly, having a central angle of 11 degrees 25 minutes 46 seconds and a radius of 870. 89 feet;
thence South 10 degrees 43 minutes 23 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 534.34 feet; thence southerly 29. 99
feet along a tangential curve concave easterly, having a central angle of 10 degrees 06 minutes 25 seconds and a radius of 170.1
feet; thence South 00 degrees 36 minutes 58 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 30.00 feet to the south line of said
South Half and said line there terminating.
Abstract property
AND
Parcel1:
The Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23, except the West 468 feet thereof,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 2:
That part of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter lying West of a line extending from the Southwest corner of the
Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter to a point on the North line of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter 660 feet
West along said North line from the Northeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, all in Section 3, Township
118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property.
Parcel 3:
Outlot B, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Abstract property
Parcel 4:
The North 468 feet of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118, Range 23,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 5:
The West 468 feet of the South 590 feet of the North 1058 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3,
Township 118 North, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 6:
That part of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23,
lying South of the North 1058 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Property Area = 5,880,542 Sf = 135.00 Ac.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
OT OVERHEAD TELEPHONE
>>
>
POWERPOLE
IRON MONUMENT FOUND
MONUMENT WITH PLASTIC
UTILITY BOX (TV, TEL, ELEC)
1/2" x 14" IRON PIPE
TRAFFIC SIGN
WATER MAIN
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
UNDERGROUND GAS MAIN
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC
FENCING
CONCRETE CURB
MANHOLE
WATER VALVE/CURB STOP
FIRE HYDRANT
FLARED END SECTION
CATCH BASIN
X
HEIGHT, TYPE
G
UT
UE
OE
FO
1 TITLE ITEM NUMBER
I
CAP #13057 SET
CONCRETE SURFACE
BUILDING
BITUMINOUS SURFACE
HEIGHT, TYPE
GRAVEL SURFACE
AIR CONDITIONER
HAND-HOLE
WETLAND
UNDERGROUND CABLE TV
WELL
GUY WIRE
TRANSFORMER
BEARING & DISTANCE
PER PLAT OR DEED
CAST IRON MONUMENT FOUND
PEDESTRIAN RAMP
SITE SYMBOLS
AC
UB
HH
WSO
PLAT EASEMENTPE
BACKGROUND INFORMATION SHOWN IS FROM A SURVEY PERFORMED BY LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES,
MINNEAPOLIS, MN WITH THE LAST DAY OF WORK PERFORMED ON NOVEMBER 4, 2020 EXPRESSLY FOR THIS PROJECT;
CITY OF MEDINA RECORD DRAWINGS; AND UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS. LANDFORM OFFERS NO WARRANTY,
EXPRESSED OR WRITTEN, FOR INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. EXISTING PROJECT CONDITIONS SHALL BE
VERIFIED PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. ERRORS, INCONSISTENCIES, OR OMISSIONS DISCOVERED SHALL BE
REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
1.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
OBTAIN PERMITS FOR DEMOLITION, CLEARING, AND DISPOSAL PRIOR TO BEGINNING.
CONTACT UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS FOR FIELD LOCATION OF SERVICES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING
DEMOLITION AND CLEARING.
SEE THE 3.X SERIES SHEETS FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES THAT MUST BE IN
PLACE PRIOR TO DISTURBANCES TO SITE.
BUILDING DEMOLITION: BUILDINGS HAVE BEEN DEMOLISHED.
DIMENSIONS SHOWN FOR REMOVAL ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE
APPROPRIATE REMOVAL OF EXISTING FACILITIES.
REFER TO DETAILS FOR PAVEMENT SAWCUT. REMOVE CONCRETE WALKS AND CURBING TO THE NEAREST EXISTING
JOINT BEYOND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
COMPLETE DEMOLITION WITH MINIMAL DISRUPTION OF TRAFFIC. COORDINATE LANE CLOSURES WITH THE
REGULATORY AUTHORITY AND PROVIDE ADVANCE NOTIFICATION TO AFFECTED EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROVIDERS.
PROVIDE BARRICADES, LIGHTS, SIGNS, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND OTHER MEASURES NECESSARY FOR PROTECTION
AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC AND MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.
PROTECT STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, TREES, PLANT MATERIAL, SOD, AND ADJACENT PROPERTY FROM DAMAGE DURING
CONSTRUCTION UNLESS NOTED FOR REMOVAL. DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED TO EQUAL OR BETTER CONDITION AT
NO ADDITIONAL COST.
ABANDON WELLS AND REMOVE ON SITE SEWAGE FACILITIES PRIOR TO ANY OTHER DEMOLITION IN ACCORDANCE
WITH REQUIREMENTS OF REGULATORY AUTHORITIES.
REFER TO TREE PRESERVATION PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
REMOVE EXISTING SITE FEATURES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, PAVING, CURBING,
WALKWAYS, FENCING, RETAINING WALLS, SCREEN WALLS, APRONS, LIGHTING, RELATED FOUNDATIONS, SIGNAGE,
BOLLARDS, LANDSCAPING, AND STAIRWAYS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
COORDINATE REMOVAL, RELOCATION, TERMINATION, AND RE-USE OF EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITY SERVICES AND
APPURTENANCES WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES. RESTORE ELECTRIC HANDHOLES, PULLBOXES, POWERPOLES,
GUYLINES, AND STRUCTURES DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH UTILITY OWNER REQUIREMENTS.
EXISTING PIPING AND CONDUITS MAY BE ABANDONED IN-PLACE IF FILLED WITH SAND AND IF NOT IN LOCATION OF
PROPOSED BUILDING OR IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES. TERMINATE EXISTING SERVICES
AT THE SUPPLY SIDE IN CONFORMANCE WITH PROVIDER'S STANDARDS.
HAUL DEMOLITION DEBRIS OFF-SITE TO A FACILITY APPROVED BY REGULATORY AUTHORITIES FOR THE HANDLING OF
DEMOLITION DEBRIS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
DEMOLITION AND CLEARING NOTES
FO
EXISTING DESCRIPTION EXISTING DESCRIPTION
CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL
REV.PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 09.14.21
CNC
RCH
2021-08-16
2021-10-08
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA NORTH
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
10.07.2021
MEH17003
20
2
1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C101MEH003.dwg
EXISTING CONDITIONS
& DEMOLITION
C1.1
:CURB REMOVAL
:TREE REMOVAL
:STRUCTURE AND/OR PAVEMENT REMOVAL
:CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
:SOIL BORING
B-X
LEGEND
:UTILITY LINE REMOVALXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
:SAWCUT
1.TOP NUT HYDRANT, 725 FEET ± FROM THE CENTERLINES INTERSECTION OF
THE WESTBOUND LANE OF TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 55 AND MOHAWK DRIVE.
WEST SIDE OF MOWHAWK DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 998.180
2.TOP NUT HYDRANT, NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF
CHIPPAWA ROAD AND HACKAMORE DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 1007.372
BENCHMARK
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
ST
M
S
T
M
S
T
M
STM
S
T
M
STMSTM
ST
M
STM
ST
M
)))))))
)))))))
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
ST
M
S
T
M
S
T
M
STM
S
T
M
STMSTM
ST
M
STM
ST
M
IP CHKIP CHK
CABX
HH
INV=988.56
INV CMP 15 TO STMH
INV=990.15
FES 15 RCP
INV=990.82
FES 15 RCP
OE OE OE OE
>>
>>
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
>>
3333
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
d
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
b
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
INV=990.47
FES 15 IN PVC
INV=990.09
FES RCP 15 IN
RE=992.02
STMH ST-1
EL=990.6
ST-2
EL=990.4
ST-3
EL=987.4
ST-4
EL=983.8
ST-5
EL=982.2
ST-17
EL=982.1
ST-18
EL=982.9
ST-19
EL=983.8
H.P.
%6.7
%
5.
3
%
4.
7
%
3.8
%
5.0
H.P.
94.28
%5.4
%4.2
%3.6
%4.8
%6.8
%8.0
%7.6
%5.6
%3.2
%2.6
%
6.4
%
7.0
%8.0
%9.0
H
.
P
.
9
8
.
1
8
H
.
P
.
L.
P
.
95.
6
0
9
6
.
1
3
L
.
P
.
9
5
.
9
9
L.P.
93.41
%7.7
%6.7
%7.3
%8.2
%7.6
%6.8
%
7.
8
%
7.
1
%8.7
%
6.1
%
6.7
%5.7
%6.7
%7.7
%6.8
D
R
O
P
1
C
%3.3
%3.5
%
5.1
%
4.7
%3.5
%3.8
%4.2
%5.6
%4.4
%4.5
%4.5
%5.6
%5.9
%4.6
%5.1
H.P.
93.37
8
5
.
5
E
O
F
EX.CL992.75
%8.0
%2.85%1.2
%
1.
0
%1.4
%
1.
6
6
G.
B
.
%6.4
%6.8
%4.3
95.0
94.0
994.6
96.3
96.3
94.8
94.8
87.5
87.5
86.0
86.0
94.0
86.0
86.0
94.0
%
1.
0
%
1.
0
986.5
86.5
94.5
86.5
86.5
86.5 86.5
93.8
93.8
94.0
93.8
94.8
94.8
94.8
94.5
94.3
94.3
94.0
93.8
%1.0
94.5
86.5 86.5
94.5
86.5
86.5
%
1.0
%
1.
3
%
1
.
0
%
1
.
0
%1.75
95.0
95.5
89.0
89.0
96.8
89.3
89.3
97.5
89.8
89.8
97.5
90.6
90.697.5
91.1
91.1
97.5
91.6
91.6
90.3
90.3
98.3
90.5
90.5
97.9
91.3
91.3
98.392.0
92.0
99.0
92.5
92.5
L.P.
91.73
H.P
.
94.
9
0
9
7
.
3
7
H
.
P
.
%
8.0
6:1Slope
in buffe
r
6:1
MAX
96.4
98.5
G
F
=
1
0
0
0
.
1
9
9
2
.
6
F
B
W
O
9
9
2
.
1
GF
=
9
9
7
.
0
98
9
.
5
FB
99
6
.
8
GF
=
9
9
5
.
5
98
8
.
0
FB
99
5
.
3
G
F
=
9
9
7
.
8
99
0
.
3
FB
W
O
98
9
.
8
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
4
9
9
1
.
6
F
B
W
O
9
9
1
.
1
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
3
9
9
0
.
8
F
B
W
O
9
9
0
.
3
G
F
=
9
9
7
.
5
99
0
.
0
F
B
W
O
9
8
9
.
5
G
F
=
9
9
7
.
1
9
8
9
.
6
F
B
W
O
9
8
9
.
1
G
F
=
9
9
5
.
5
9
8
8
.
7
F
B
W
O
9
8
8
.
2
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
98
7
.
0
FB
99
4
.
3
GF
=
9
9
5
.
5
98
8
.
0
FB
99
5
.
3
GF
=
9
9
5
.
0
98
7
.
5
FB
99
4
.
8
GF=995.0
987.5
FBWO
987.0
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
2
9
9
2
.
1
F
B
W
O
9
9
1
.
6
GF=
9
9
5
.
0
987.
5
FB
W
O
987.
0GF=995.0
987.5
FBWO
987.0
GF
=
9
9
5
.
0
98
7
.
5
FB
W
O
98
7
.
0
GF
=
9
9
4
.
7
98
7
.
2
FB
W
O
98
6
.
7
GF
=
9
9
5
.
0
98
7
.
5
FB
W
O
98
7
.
0
GF
=
9
9
6
.
0
98
8
.
5
FB
W
O
98
8
.
0
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
8
9
9
2
.
7
F
B
W
O
9
9
2
.
5
G
F
=
1
0
0
0
.
7
9
9
3
.
2
F
B
W
O
9
9
2
.
7
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
8
9
9
1
.
3
F
B
W
O
9
9
0
.
8
G
F
=
9
9
4
.
5
9
8
7
.
0
F
B
9
9
4
.
3
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
4
9
9
2
.
3
F
B
W
O
9
9
1
.
8
G
F
=
9
9
9
.
0
9
9
1
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
9
1
.
0
GF
=
9
9
4
.
7
98
7
.
2
FB
W
O
98
6
.
7
96.5
93.0
93.2
93.0
D
R
O
P
1
C
D
R
O
P
2
C
%
1
.
4
996
9
9
0
9
9
0
998
D
R
O
P
2
C
D
R
O
P
2
C
992
9
8
8
9
8
8
9
9
2
9
9
8
VMA
98
4
99
4
990
996
9
9
6
9
9
6
990
994
986
994
992
994
996
994
99
8
99
6
99
2
99
4
99
6
99
4
99
6
99
4
99
6
992
9
9
2
9
9
0
984
984
9
8
4
9
8
6
98
4
99
4
996
990
9
8
6
998
986986
9
9
0
996
982
9
8
4
9
9
2
990
9
9
4
99
4
9
8
8
9
8
4
9
9
2
994
994
990
986
99
4
9
8
6
9
9
4
99
4
994
9
9
4
994
99
4
99
4
994
9
9
0
986
994
9
9
4
9
9
2
9
8
6
990
994
994
9
9
2
99
4
99
2
99
4
99
2
9
9
2
9
9
4
99
6
9
9
2
99
4
9
9
6
996
9
8
3
984
981
980
978
976
974973
983
9
8
4
9
8
0
97
4
98
4
9
8
0
97
6
97
3
973 974
978
981
98
3
9
8
4
9
7
3
9
7
4
9
7
8
98
1
9
8
3
98
6
983
98
6
994
992
9
9
0
988
9
8
6
9
8
4
982
99
4
99
0
986
9
8
2
98
2
982
982
98
6
98
8
992
E
O
F
EO
F
EOF
EO
F
TW=998.0
BW=996.5
TW=998.0
BW=997.0
4
3
2
1
50
49
48
47
46
45
44
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
2
34
56
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
27
BLOCK 8
13
0+00 1+00 2+00
0+
0
0
1+
0
0
2+
0
0
3+
0
0
4
+
0
0
5+0
0
7+00
1
6
+
0
0
1
7
+
0
0
18+
0
0
19
+
0
0
2
0
+
0
0
2
1
+
0
0
2
2
+
0
0
2
3
+
0
0
2
4
+
0
0
25+0026+0027+0028+00
29+
0
0
30
+
0
0
31
+
0
0
31
+
1
7
.
8
7
BTM = 973.00
NWL = 982.00
HWL = 984.34
100 YR B-B = 985.15
IRRIGATION POND
(1P)
WETLAND 1b
HWL = 981.63
35'
35'
35'
35'
OUTLOT J
OUTLOT H
OUTLOT H
OUTLOT I
51
BLOCK 7
51
BLOCK 7
51
BLOCK 7
27
BLOCK 8
INV=981.70
C7.1
3,4&5
INLET
PROTECTION
ENKAMAT
(TYP)
C7.1
8
EROSION
CONTROL
BLANKET
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
1
SILT FENCE
C7.1
7
ROCK
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
3,4&5
INLET
PROTECTION
C7.1
8
EROSION
CONTROL
BLANKET
BORROW AREA
3
C7.1
1
SILT
FENCE
NORTH
0 50 100
CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL
REV.PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 09.14.21
CNC
RCH
2021-08-16
2021-10-08
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA NORTH
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
10.07.2021
MEH17003
20
2
1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C301MEH003.dwg
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
C3.1NO SCALE
TYPICAL LOT DETAIL1
NOTES:
1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY.
: REAR ELEVATION
: BUILDING TYPE - (CUSTOM GRADING BY BUILDER)
: MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION
: FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
: DRP 1' DENOTES DISTANCE GARAGE
FLOOR IS DROPPED FROM TYPICAL.
DRP
1'
MAIN STREET
BLK 1
5
X 105.0 X 105.0
X
106.5
X
106.5
DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNER
ELEVATIONS
DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT
20' FRONT
10' SIDE
10' REAR
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE
DENOTES BUILDING
SETBACKS
BUILDING TYPES:
FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALK OUT
FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT
SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT
FB = FULL BASEMENT
DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW
4.
5
%
DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPE
(CG)
108.3
FB
100.0
GF=108.5
GENERAL NOTES
FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070.
SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELM CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION (ECWMC).
DENOTES BORROW AREA. AFTER MATERIAL IS REMOVED CONTRACTOR TO BRING BOTTOM OF
POND TO 873.0 WITH GRADING SPOIL.
1.
2.
GRADING NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR GRADING NOTES
EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES.
SEE SHEET C3.2
3
1.TOP NUT HYDRANT, 725 FEET ± FROM THE CENTERLINES INTERSECTION OF
THE WESTBOUND LANE OF TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 55 AND MOHAWK DRIVE.
WEST SIDE OF MOWHAWK DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 998.180
2.TOP NUT HYDRANT, NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF
CHIPPAWA ROAD AND HACKAMORE DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 1007.372
BENCHMARK
:Inlet Protection
nn
:Silt Fence
:Vehicle Tracking Pad
47 Each
3 Each
21740 Feet
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
:Compost or Bio Log 855 Feet)))))))))))))
:Erosion Control Blanket 12000 S.Y.
LEGEND
ESTIMATED QUANTITYSYMBOLDESCRIPTION
910
908
:MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:Heavy Duty Silt Fence 17689 Feet
:Pavement Sawcut
:Construction Limits
:Wetland Impact Area
:Flood Plain Impact Area
:Flood Plain Mitigation Area
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>
>
ST
M
STM
STM
S
T
M
ST
M
S
T
M
S
T
M
>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
))))))
)
))))))
)
44
43
42
41
36 35
34 33
32
31
30
29
28
27
26
25 24
23
20
5+0
0
6+00
7+00
8+00
9+
0
0
1
0
+
0
0
11+00
12+00
13+00
14+
0
0
15
+
0
0
1
6
+
0
0
1
4321
5
BLK 1
4
CHIPPEWA ROAD
MO
H
A
W
K
D
R
I
V
E
-0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00
14
+
0
0
15
+
0
0
15
+
5
0
.
4
8
6+
0
0
7+
0
0
7+
5
2
.
2
5
3+00
4+00
4+61.32
POND
(23P)
BTM = 976.00
NWL = 985.00
HWL = 986.54
POND
(9P)
BTM = 976.00
NWL = 985.00
HWL = 987.11
WETLAND 1f
HWL =
985.16
POND 3
HWL =
991.07
WETLAND 1e
HWL = 983.88
WETLAND 2
HWL = 986.27
WETLAND 1d
HWL = 982.55
FOREBAY
(13P)
BTM = 979.00
NWL = 986.00
HWL = 987.91
35'
35'
3
5
'
2
5
'
2
5
'
50'
50'
25'
35
'
3
0
'
50'
37
38
39
40
35
'
35
'
50
'
25'
33
'
25'
38'
2
0
'
OUTLOT G
OU
T
L
O
T
F
OUTLOT J
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT H
51
BLOCK 7
51
BLOCK 7
OUTLOT I
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>
>
ST
M
STM
STM
S
T
M
ST
M
S
T
M
S
T
M
>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
CABX
W
>>
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
>>
WE
T
L
A
N
D
2
33 33
3333
33
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
e
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
d
WL 1e-1
WL 3
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1f
ST-8
EL=986.2
ST-9
EL=981.2
ST-12
ST-18
EL=982.9
ST-21
EL=982.6
ST-22
EL=985.8
H.P.
91.79
L.P.
90.38
H.P.
93.49
%
4
.
6
%
5
.
4
%4.3
%
3
.
3
90.80
L.P.
%
5.0
%
4.4
%
5.4
L.P.H.P.
L.P.
H.P.
%7.9
%5.7
%
7.
8
%
7.
1
%7.2
%7.6
D
R
O
P
1
C
%4.2
%8.0
DR
O
P
2
C
DR
O
P
2
C
%
4.1
%
5.5
%
4.8
%
4.6
%
4
.
1
%
4
.
1
CL CL
%
7.8
%
7.7
L.
P
.
%
5
.
6
%5.2
%6.1
%5.4
%
8.
7
EO
F
L.
P
.
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
%
7.
9 %
6.
8
%
6.
6
%9.2
GF = 994.5
EX.CL
993.17
%5.0
92.3
89.1
88.5
96
.
0
91.092.0
94
.
0
90.3
92
.
5
89.3
GF
=
9
9
2
.
5
93.5
93.8
93.8
%1.0
87.9
87.9
85.0
85.0
93.0
85.5
85.5
93.0
%
1.2
%
1.
0
G
.
B
.
%1.0
85.5
85.5
91.6
86.4
86.4
%1.0
%
4
.
0
87.6
87.6
994.8
88.0
88.0
%
3
.
0
G.
B
.
96.0
88.3
88.3
93.5
94
.
1
7
%
1.
0
GB
987.0
987.0
994.0
986.0
986.0
%1.0 %1.9 %1.0
%0.5
%
4.
1
%
1.
7
4
89
.
5
4
91.7
89.4 89.3
CL CL
93.33
%
1.
0
L.P
.
92
.
4
0
%
2.
0
%
1.
0
93.43
H.P.%1.0
%5.3
%
8.
1
%
5.6
%1.6
87.5
85.
7
86.
0
8
8
.
0
EOF
86.5
E
O
F
EOF
87
.
5
E
O
F
L.P.
91.60
%
1.
5
CL CL
V
M
A
6:1Slope
in buffer
6
:
1
S
l
o
p
e
D
R
O
P
2
C
D
R
O
P
2
C
%0.5
88.1
88
.
1
88.1
88.1
8
8
.
1
6:1
VMA
VM
A
8
8
.
5
G
F
=
9
9
5
.
1
98
9
.
0
FB
W
O
9
8
8
.
5
G
F
=
9
9
5
.
5
9
8
8
.
7
F
B
W
O
9
8
8
.
2
GF=993.0
990.3
SEWO
989.8
G
F
=
9
9
6
.
0
9
8
8
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
8
8
.
0
GF=994.5
991.3
SEWO
990.8
GF=996.5
889.0
FBLO
991.5
GF=997.5
890.0
FBLO
992.5
GF
=
9
9
2
.
8
99
0
.
1
SE
W
O
98
9
.
6
GF
=
9
9
7
.
0
98
9
.
5
FB
W
O
98
9
.
0
G
F
=
9
9
5
.
0
98
8
.
9
F
B
W
O
98
8
.
4
G
F
=
9
9
2
.
5
9
8
6
.
9
F
B
W
O
9
8
6
.
4
GF
=
9
9
6
.
5
989.
0
FB
W
O
988.
5 GF=9
9
6
.
8
989.
3
FBW
O
988.
8
GF
=
9
9
4
.
0
98
6
.
5
FB
W
O
98
6
.
0
G
F
=
9
9
5
.
4
9
8
8
.
6
F
B
W
O
9
8
8
.
1
GF=994.0
986.5
FBWO
986.0
GF
=
9
9
5
.
5
98
8
.
0
FB
W
O
98
7
.
5
G
F
=
9
9
4
.
5
9
8
7
.
0
F
B
9
9
4
.
3
GF=993.5
986.0
FBWO
985.5
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
98
7
.
0
FB
W
O
98
6
.
5
986
990
988
988
988
988
99
2
98
6
982
986
98
6
986
988
990
990990
990
979
980
982
984986
992
990
987
988
99
2
99
2
99
0
99
0
9
8
5
9
8
4
982 980 978 978
986
985
984
982
980
978
99
0
98
6 98
6
92
.
3
9
986 988
988
986
98
6
98
8
98
8
9
8
6
98
8
9
8
8
9
8
6
984
988
986 984
D
R
O
P
2
C
D
R
O
P
1
C
988
988
5+
5
0
13
+
1
0
9
8
8
9
8
6
992
982
9
8
4
988
992
9
8
2
99
6
992
992
986
988
985
990
992
990
990
990
992
9
8
6
99
0
99
4
9
8
6
98
8
990
990
994
99
2
99
4
98
2
9
9
4
99
0
9
9
2
9
9
2
9
8
6
99098
8
986
990
9
9
2
988 994
9
9
2
990
9
9
2
99
0
98
6
990
992
99
0
9
9
2
99
4
98
8
994
996
9
9
0
99
4
9
8
4
9
8
8
988
985
9
8
8
9
8
8
98
5
984
9
8
7
990
98
8
987
98
6
985
987
987
98
6
987
987
99
2
986
976
980
98
4
990
983
9
8
2
980
978
976
974
992
994
984
984
9
8
4
984
992
990
9
8
8
9
9
0
9
8
6
988988
9
8
4
9
8
8
98
4
99
4
993
994
9
8
8
99
4
994
988994
988
98
4
984985
992
990
988
986
984
9
9
2
9
8
6
994
99
2
9
8
8
9
8
4
98
6
98
8
982
98
4
98
8
986
994
996996
9
8
8
9
8
8
9
8
8
986
EO
F
EO
F
EOF
TW=992.0
BW=988.5
TW=992.0
BW=988.0
TW=990.5
BW=988.0
C7.1
3,4&5
INLET
PROTECTION
C7.1
8
EROSION
CONTROL
BLANKET
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
1
SILT FENCE
ENKAMAT (TYP)
C7.1
6
FES EROSION
CONTROL (TYP)
C7.1
9&10
TEMPORARY
COMPOST BIO LOG
ENKAMAT (TYP)
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
1
SILT FENCE
C7.1
3,4&5
INLET
PROTECTION
C7.1
8
EROSION
CONTROL
BLANKET
NORTH
0 50 100
CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL
REV.PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 09.14.21
CNC
RCH
2021-08-16
2021-10-08
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA NORTH
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
10.07.2021
MEH17003
20
2
1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C302MEH003.dwg
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
C3.2NO SCALE
TYPICAL LOT DETAIL1
NOTES:
1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY.
: REAR ELEVATION
: BUILDING TYPE - (CUSTOM GRADING BY BUILDER)
: MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION
: FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
: DRP 1' DENOTES DISTANCE GARAGE
FLOOR IS DROPPED FROM TYPICAL.
DRP
1'
MAIN STREET
BLK 1
5
X 105.0 X 105.0
X
106.5
X
106.5
DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNER
ELEVATIONS
DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT
20' FRONT
10' SIDE
10' REAR
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE
DENOTES BUILDING
SETBACKS
BUILDING TYPES:
FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALK OUT
FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT
SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT
FB = FULL BASEMENT
DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW
4.
5
%
DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPE
(CG)
108.3
FB
100.0
GF=108.5
GENERAL NOTES
FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070.
SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELM CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION (ECWMC).
1.
2.
GRADING NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR GRADING NOTES
EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES.
SEE SHEET C3.2
1.TOP NUT HYDRANT, 725 FEET ± FROM THE CENTERLINES INTERSECTION OF
THE WESTBOUND LANE OF TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 55 AND MOHAWK DRIVE.
WEST SIDE OF MOWHAWK DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 998.180
2.TOP NUT HYDRANT, NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF
CHIPPAWA ROAD AND HACKAMORE DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 1007.372
BENCHMARK
:Inlet Protection
nn
:Silt Fence
:Vehicle Tracking Pad
47 Each
3 Each
21740 Feet
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
:Compost or Bio Log 855 Feet)))))))))))))
:Erosion Control Blanket 12000 S.Y.
LEGEND
ESTIMATED QUANTITYSYMBOLDESCRIPTION
910
908
:MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:Heavy Duty Silt Fence 17689 Feet
:Pavement Sawcut
:Construction Limits
:Wetland Impact Area
:Flood Plain Impact Area
:Flood Plain Mitigation Area
INV=984.36
INV 27 RCP
INV=982.56
INV 27IN RCP
INV=984.16
FES 18IN RCP CBMH CL
RE=992.2
INV=990.14
FES 15IN RCP
>>
DNR WETLAND 27-493W
NORTH PORTION
OHW = 978.3
FLOODPLAIN = 979.2
( As of 8/10/20)
ST-6
EL=984.8
ST-7
EL=983.7
952
974
976
978
984
9
8
2
98
0
97
0
96
0
95
2
98
0
97
0
96
0
982
98
2
97
4
97
4
9
7
4
97
6
97
8
98
0
9
7
8
9
7
4
982
980
978
976
974
952
9
6
0
9
7
0
972
970
968
966
964
962
960
958
956
954
OUTLOT J
PROPOSED 100-YR
HWL = 979.08
WETLAND 1b1
HWL = 980.63
BTM = 974.00
NWL = 979.50
HWL = 980.21
POND (6P)
35'
50'
35'
HA
C
K
A
M
O
R
E
D
R
I
V
E
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
NORTH
0 50 100
CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL
REV.PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 09.14.21
CNC
RCH
2021-08-16
2021-10-08
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA NORTH
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
10.07.2021
MEH17003
20
2
1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C305MEH003.dwg
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
C3.5
:Inlet Protection
nn
:Silt Fence
:Pavement Sawcut
:Construction Limits
:Vehicle Tracking Pad
47 Each
3 Each
21740 Feet
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
:Compost or Bio Log 855 Feet)))))))))))))
:Erosion Control Blanket 12000 S.Y.
NO SCALE
TYPICAL LOT DETAIL1
NOTES:
1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY.
: REAR ELEVATION
: BUILDING TYPE - (CUSTOM GRADING BY BUILDER)
: MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION
: FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
: DRP 1' DENOTES DISTANCE GARAGE
FLOOR IS DROPPED FROM TYPICAL.
DRP
1'
MAIN STREET
BLK 1
5
X 105.0 X 105.0
X
106.5
X
106.5
DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNER
ELEVATIONS
DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT
20' FRONT
10' SIDE
10' REAR
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE
DENOTES BUILDING
SETBACKS
BUILDING TYPES:
FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALK OUT
FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT
SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT
FB = FULL BASEMENT
DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW
4.
5
%
DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPE
(CG)
108.3
FB
100.0
GF=108.5
GENERAL NOTES
FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070.
SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELM CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION (ECWMC).
1.
2.
LEGEND
ESTIMATED QUANTITYSYMBOLDESCRIPTION
910
908
:MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
GRADING NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR GRADING NOTES
EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES.
:Heavy Duty Silt Fence 17689 Feet
:Wetland Impact Area
SEE SHEET C3.6
SE
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
3
.
1
:Flood Plain Impact Area
:Flood Plain Mitigation Area
4
3
2
1
50
49
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
41
36 35
34 33
32
31
30
29
28
27
26
25 24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
2
34
56
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
27
BLOCK 8
13
0+00 1+00 2+00
0+
0
0
1+
0
0
2+
0
0
3+
0
0
4
+
0
0
5+0
0
6+00
7+00
8+00
9+
0
0
1
0
+
0
0
11+00
12+00
13+00
14+
0
0
15
+
0
0
1
6
+
0
0
1
7
+
0
0
18+
0
0
19
+
0
0
2
0
+
0
0
2
1
+
0
0
2
2
+
0
0
2
3
+
0
0
2
4
+
0
0
25+0026+0027+0028+00
29+
0
0
30
+
0
0
31
+
0
0
31
+
1
7
.
8
7
2+
9
2
.
0
4
0+
0
0
1+
0
0
2+
0
0
1
4321
5
BLK 1
4
CHIPPEWA ROAD
MO
H
A
W
K
D
R
I
V
E
-0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00
14+00
15+00
14
+
0
0
15
+
0
0
15
+
5
0
.
4
8
POND
(23P)
BTM = 973.00
NWL = 982.00
HWL = 984.34
100 YR B-B = 985.15
IRRIGATION POND
(1P)
BTM = 976.00
NWL = 985.00
HWL = 986.54
POND
(9P)
BTM = 976.00
NWL = 985.00
HWL = 987.11
POND
(5P)
BTM = 974.00
NWL = 983.00
HWL = 984.65
WETLAND 1f
HWL =
985.16
POND 3
HWL =
991.07
WETLAND 1e
HWL = 983.88
WETLAND 2
HWL = 986.27
WETLAND 1d
HWL = 982.55
WETLAND 1c
HWL =
981.76
WETLAND 1b1
HWL = 980.63
WETLAND 1b
HWL = 981.63
FOREBAY
(13P)
BTM = 979.00
NWL = 986.00
HWL = 987.91
37
38
39
40
WETLAND 1a-North
HWL = 979.07
OUTLOT G
OU
T
L
O
T
F
OUTLOT J
OUTLOT J
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT H
OUTLOT H
51
BLOCK 7
OUTLOT I
51
BLOCK 7
51
BLOCK 7
51
BLOCK 7
27
BLOCK 8
51
BLOCK 7
OUTLOT I
CABX
CABX
992.4W
UE
UE
UE
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
OE OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>
>
I
I
I
I
33 33
3333
3333
33
>>
980.6
ST-1
EL=990.6
ST-2
EL=990.4
ST-3
EL=987.4
ST-4
EL=983.8
ST-5
EL=982.2
ST-8
EL=986.2
ST-9
EL=981.2
ST-10
EL=981.7
ST-17EL=982.1
ST-18
EL=982.9
ST-19
EL=983.8
ST-20
EL=982.6
ST-21
EL=982.6
ST-22
EL=985.8
EX. 2" JACKED CASING
EX. 12" DIP WATERMAIN
W/12" PLUG
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>
>
ST
M
S
T
M
S
T
M
STM
S
T
M
STMSTM
ST
M
STM
STM
STM
S
T
M
ST
M
S
T
M
S
T
M
ST
M
SAN
S
A
N
SAN
SAN
SAN
SA
N
S
A
N
S
A
N
SA
N
S
A
N
S
A
N
S
A
N
SA
N
SA
N
S
A
N
S
A
N
SA
N
SA
N
SA
N
SANSAN
12"
W
A
T
.
12"
W
A
T
.
12
"
W
A
T
.
12"
W
A
T
.
12
"
W
A
T
.
12" WAT.
8" WAT.8"
W
A
T
.
8
"
W
A
T
.
8
"
W
A
T
.
8"
W
A
T
.
8"
W
A
T
.
8
"
W
A
T
.
8
"
W
A
T
.
8"
W
A
T
.
1
2
"
W
A
T
.
8" WA
T
.
8"
W
A
T
.
8"
W
A
T
.
8"
W
A
T
.
>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
S
A
N
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
SA
N
8"
W
A
T
.
8"
W
A
T
.
8" W
A
T
.
>>
EX. SAN MH
MH 1
MH 2
MH 3
MH 4
MH 5
MH 17
MH 18
MH 19
MH 20
MH 6
MH 7
MH 8
MH 9
MH 10
MH 11
MH 12
MH 13
MH 14
MH 15
MH 16
FES 500
CBMH 501 CB 501A
CBMH 502
CBMH 503
CBMH 504
CB 504AOCS 1
FES 1
FES 400
CB 401A
CBMH 401
CB 401B
FES 305
FES 303
FES 304
FES 302
CBMH 206
CB 206A
CBMH 205
CBMH 204
STMH 203
CBMH 202A
CBMH 202
CBMH 201
FES 200
CB 903ACBMH 903
OCS 2
FES 2
OCS 3
FES 3
CB 601A
CBMH 601
FES 600
FES 100
STMH 100A
CB 101A
CBMH 101
CB 102B
STMH 102
CB 102A
CB 103B
FES 103A
STMH 103
STUB 12"
WATER
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
W
I
T
H
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
O
F
C
H
I
P
P
A
W
A
R
O
A
D
STMH 901
STMH 902
FES 900
FES 4
OCS 4
CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL
REV.PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 09.14.21
CNC
RCH
2021-08-16
2021-10-08
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA NORTH
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
10.07.2021
MEH17003
20
2
1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
NORTH
0 100 200
Pipe Materials
Watermain 6" DIP Class 52-Hydrant Leads, 8" PVC C900 & 12" PVC C900 -Main Lines
(ANSI A21.51/AWWA C151)
Water Service 1" Copper Type K (ASTM B88) Curb Stop shall be adjusted to an elevation
of 2" below finished grade. See detail SER-01.
Sanitary Sewer 8" PVC SDR 35 (ASTM: D3034, D2665, & F891)
Sanitary Sewer Service 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 (ASTM: D1785, D3034, D2665, & F891)
Storm Sewer RCP 12"-18" CLASS 5 (ASTM C76)
RCP 21" CLASS 4 (ASTM C76)
RCP 24"-48" CLASS 3 (ASTM C76)
Draintile 6" Perforated Polyethylene HDPE (ASTM F667), PVC (ASTM D2729) 1' Behind Curb with a
6"x4" Tee & 4" PVC To Property Line For Home Sump Pump Connection. See C7.4/5.
Contact Utility Service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning.
Contractor to field verify location and elevation of all utility points of connection prior to construction of any proposed utilities. Contractor to
notify Engineer immediately if there is any discrepancy.
Contractor to pothole all utility crossings prior to construction of new utilities to verify depths of existing lines. Contact Engineer immediately
if any conflicts are discovered.
Provide means and measures to protect adjacent property from damage during utility installation.
Pipe lengths shown are from center of structure to center of structure or end of end section.
Install tracer wire with all non-conductive utilities in accordance with City of Medina Standards.
Connect to City Utilities in accordance with City of Medina Standards.
Contact Steve Scherer, City of Medina Public Works Department, at 763.473.8842 for Wet Tap inspection.
Maintain 7.5 Feet of cover on water.
Deflect water to maintain 18-inch minimum outside separation at sewer crossings. Center pipe lengths to provide greatest separation
between joints.
Contact Steve Scherer, City of Medina Public Works Department, at 763.473.8842 for flushing and pressure test inspections.
All joints and connections in the storm sewer system shall be gastight or water tight. Approved resilient rubber joints must be used to make
watertight connections to manholes, catch basins, and other structures.
Catch basins in curb and gutter are sumped 2 inches below the gutter grade. Refer to Detail STR-03 & STR-04 on Sheet C7.X.
Irrigation sleeve to be 4" Schedule 80 PVC buried 24" below grade. Extend sleeves 3' beyond the edge of pavement. Mark each end of
sleeve with 3/4" rebar 12" below finish grade. (coordinate with irrigation contractor.)
Compact cohesive soils in paved areas to 95% of maximum dry density, Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) except the top 3 feet which shall
be compacted to 100%. compact to 98% density where fill depth exceeds 10 feet. The soils shall be within 3% of optimum moisture
content. In granular soils all portions of the embankment shall be compacted to not less than 95% of Modified Proctor Density (ASTM
D1557).
Adjust structures to final grade where disturbed. Comply with requirements of Utility. Meet requirements for traffic loading in paved areas.
Rock media in infiltration or filtration systems shall be angular, non calcareous rock.
Coordinate with private utilities to provide electric, natural gas, and communications services.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20..
GENERAL NOTES
UTILITY NOTES
For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1.
C400MEH003.dwg
UTILITY SCHEMATIC /UTILITY NOTES
SERVICES & STORM SCHEDULE
C4.0
CB 401A
CBMH 401(SUMP)
CB 206A
CBMH 206
CBMH 205
CBMH 204
STMH 203
CB 202B
CBMH 202A
CBMH 202
CBMH 201(SUMP)
CB 103B
STMH 103
CB 102B
CB 102A
CB 101A
CBMH 101(SUMP)
STMH 100A
48"
48"
R-3067-VB
R-1642-B
STORM SEWER SCHEDULE
CB 401B
STMH 102
2'x3'
NUMBER DIAM.CASTING
STREET NOTES
Spot Elevations at curblines indicate back of curb unless noted otherwise. See Sheets C5.1 thru C5.4 for rim elevations of catch
basins.
Grades between proposed spot elevations shall be continuous and nonvariable. Spot Elevations shall govern over contour lines.
Meet and Match existing curb. Transition as needed.
Concrete Joints
Install joints as shown and align across sidewalks, curbs, and pavement, paying attention to spacing of expansion joints.
Joint spacing shall be as follows:
a. Tooled joints: Divide panels into nominally equal areas unless shown otherwise.
b. Expansion Joints: Sidewalks - 40 feet max.; Curbs - 60 feet max.; Pavement: 80 feet max.; Adjacent to building
foundations and stoops.
c. Contraction Joints: Sidewalks - 8 to 10 feet; Curbs and Aprons - 12 to 15 feet.
Adjust all structure rims to match pavement elevations.
Curb and gutter at all intersections shall be B-618
Surrmountable curb and gutter on streets
Refer to sheets C6.1 thru C6.5 for street sections.
CB 903A
CBMH 903(SUMP)
CB 601A
CBMH 601(SUMP)
CB 504A
CBMH 504
CBMH 503
CBMH 502
CB 501A
CBMH 501(SUMP)
OCS 1
OCS 2
OCS 3
DETAIL
STO-1
48"
2'x3'
2'x3'
48"
27"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
R-3067-VB
R-1642-B
R-1642-B
R-1642-B
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
2'x3'
2'x3'
2'x3'
2'x3'
2'x3'
2'x3'
2'x3'
48"
48"
2'x3'
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-4342
R-3067-V
R-3067-V
R-3067-V
R-3067-V
R-3067-V
STO-1
STO-1
STO-1
STO-6
STO-6
STO-5
STO-5
STO-7
STO-4
STO-4
STO-6
STO-6
STO-6
STO-6
STO-6
STO-6
STO-6
STO-4
STO-4
STO-4
STO-5
STO-5
STO-4
STO-4
STO-5
STO-6
STO-6
STO-4
STO-5
GALVANIZED C7.6/1
GALVANIZED
GALVANIZED
C7.6/2
C7.6/3
FES 2
FES 3
FES 1
FES 100
FES 103A
FES 200
FES 302
FES 303
FES 304
FES 305
FES 500
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
21" RCP APRON STO-8 &9
18" RCP APRON
18" RCP APRON
18" RCP APRON
18" RCP APRON
STO-8 &9
STO-8
STO-8
STO-8 &9
STO-8 &915" RCP APRON
12" RCP APRON STO-8 &9
FES 600 NA STO-8 &915" RCP APRON
21" RCP APRON STO-8 &9
15" RCP APRON STO-8
STO-8 &915" RCP APRON
18" RCP APRON STO-8 &9
SERVICES SCHEDULE (NORTH)
1.TOP NUT HYDRANT, 725 FEET ± FROM THE CENTERLINES INTERSECTION OF THE WESTBOUND LANE OF TRUNK
HIGHWAY NO. 55 AND MOHAWK DRIVE. WEST SIDE OF MOWHAWK DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 998.180
2.TOP NUT HYDRANT, NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF CHIPPAWA ROAD AND HACKAMORE DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 1007.372
BENCHMARK
FES 600 NA STO-8 &915" RCP APRON
STMH 901 48"R-1642-B STO-1
STMH 902 48"R-1642-B STO-1
UTILITY SCHEMATIC (NORTH)1
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
OCS 4 48"GALVANIZED C7.6/4
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
NORTH
NO SCALE
AREA LOCATION MAP
SITE
HORSESHOE TRAIL
RO
L
L
I
N
G
H
I
L
L
S
R
D
.
ABBREVIATIONS
MODULAR RETAINING WALL
FIELDSTONE RETAINING WALL
NEW
CATV UNDERGROUND CABLE/TV
EXISTING DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
STORM SEWER
WATERMAIN
FORCE MAIN
SANITARY SEWER-WASTE
ROOF DRAIN SYSTEM
GAS LINE-UNDERGROUND
FIRE LINE (IF SEPARATE)
FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION
SOIL SUBDRAIN
TELEPHONE-UNDERGROUND
ELECTRIC-UNDERGROUND
LAWN SPRINKLER SLEEVE
>
>
>>
RIPRAP
>>
FM
STS
RD
GATE VALVE
WTR
SAN
BLDG.
FIRE
GAS
HYD
TELE
ELEC
X"SSD
LSS
C.O.
MAJOR CONTOUR
BUILDING
SPOT ELEVATION
120
CONCRETE
SLOPE DIRECTION
CONCRETE CURB
GUARD RAIL
FENCING
CONCRETE RETAINING WALL
HEIGHT, TYPE
POWER POLE
LIGHT STANDARD
EXIT LOCATION
UNDERGROUND STRUCTURE
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
BOLLARD
CANOPY/OVERHANG
BIT. EDGE
FES
CATCH BASIN
MANHOLE
SYMBOLS
LANDSCAPING
GRAVEL
FLAG POLE
>
>>
POWERPOLE
GUARD POST
GAS METER
TREES
TRAFFIC SIGN
WATER MAIN
SANITARY SEWER LINE
STORM SEWER LINE
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
MAJOR CONTOUR
SPOT ELEVATION
CONCRETE
BUILDING
CANOPY / OVERHANG
120
GM
12"STS
8"SAN
LT
FENCING
CONCRETE CURB
RETAINING WALL
OE
MANHOLE
WATER VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
FLARED END SECTION
CATCH BASIN
6"WTR
XX
HEIGHT, TYPE
1 NOTE NUMBER
GUY WIRE
IRON MONUMENT FOUND
WATER SHUT-OFF VALVE
l l
MEASURED DISTANCE
DISTANCE PER RECORDED PLAT
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONEUT
UNDERGROUND ELECTRICUE
GAS LINEG
PAVING BLOCK
PAVING BLOCK
SET 1/2" X 14" IRON PIPE
TRANSFORMER
TREE LINE
MB
MAILBOX
SURVEY DISK (BENCHMARK)
WSO
BITUMINOUS
SOIL BORING
B-X
123.45
%1.00
234.5
LIGHT POLE
MINOR CONTOUR123MINOR CONTOUR123
SILT FENCE
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
REVISED AREA (THIS ISSUE)
REVISION - ADDENDUM, BULLETIN, ETC.
NOTE REFERENCE
LARGE SHEET DETAIL
COORDINATE POINT
PARKING STALL COUNT
DESCRIPTIONSYMBOL
EROSION CONTROL SYMBOLS
DRAWING SYMBOLS
n n n
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BENCHMARK
INLET PROTECTION
C21
C7.3
1
12
2
GSID Station # 10300 USGS Quad: HAMEL County: HENNEPIN, MN Mn/DOT Name: 2722 T Stamping: 2722 T 1977
Monument Type: SURVEY DISK Disk Type: ALUMINUM ALLOY ROD (NO SLEEVE) (DEPTH 8 FT)
Directions:
2.5 MILES WEST OF HAMEL, 2.4 MILES WEST ALONG TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 FROM THE JUNCTION OF TRUNK HIGHWAY 55
AND COUNTY ROAD 101 IN HAMEL, AT TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 MILEPOINT 174, 73.0 FEET NORTH OF TRUNK HIGHWAY 55,
166.0 FEET EAST OF MOHAWK DRIVE, 27.0 FEET SOUTHWEST OF A POWER POLE WITH GUY WIRE, 26.0 FEET SOUTH OF A
FENCE LINE, 1.0 FOOT SOUTH OF A WITNESS POST.
That part of the South Half of Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying
Northwesterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 01 degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds
East on an assumed bearing along the east line of South half a distance of 833.09 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be
described; thence South 22 degrees 09 minutes 09 seconds West a distance of 86.32 feet; thence Southerly 173. 73 feet along a
tangential curve concave southeasterly, having a central angle of 11 degrees 25 minutes 46 seconds and a radius of 870. 89 feet;
thence South 10 degrees 43 minutes 23 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 534.34 feet; thence southerly 29. 99 feet
along a tangential curve concave easterly, having a central angle of 10 degrees 06 minutes 25 seconds and a radius of 170.1 feet;
thence South 00 degrees 36 minutes 58 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 30.00 feet to the south line of said South
Half and said line there terminating.
Abstract property
AND
Parcel1:
The Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23, except the West 468
feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 2:
That part of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter lying West of a line extending from the Southwest
corner of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter to a point on the North line of the Northeast quarter of the
Southeast quarter 660 feet West along said North line from the Northeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the
Southeast quarter, all in Section 3, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property.
Parcel 3:
Outlot B, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Abstract property
Parcel 4:
The North 468 feet of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township
118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 5:
The West 468 feet of the South 590 feet of the North 1058 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter
of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 6:
That part of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North,
Range 23, lying South of the North 1058 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
3
DESCRIPTIONSHEET NO.
CIVIL & LANDSCAPE TITLE SHEET
EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL
IMPORT STOCKPILE
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL
ENLARGED DETAILS
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL
ENLARGED DETAILS
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL
ENLARGED DETAILS
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL
ENLARGED DETAILS
MN SWPPP NOTES
UTILITY SCHEMATIC/UTILITY NOTES/
SERVICE & STORM SCHEDULE
SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN
STORM SEWER
STORM SEWER
STORM SEWER
STREET PROFILE - HILLSIDE DRIVE
STREET PROFILE - HILLSIDE DRIVE
STREET PROFILES - BROOKVIEW COURT
& LEAPING DEER LANE
LIGHTING AND SIGNAGE PLAN
PED. RAMP ENLARGED DETAILS
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAILS
LANDSCAPE PLAN - SOUTH
LANDSCAPE DETAILS
CERTIFICATIONS
CIVIL / LANDSCAPE SHEET INDEX & REVISION MATRIX
OWNER
C0.1
C1.1
C3.0
C3.1
C3.2
C3.3
C3.4
C3.5
C3.6
C3.7
C3.8
C4.0
C4.1
C4.2
C4.3
C4.4
C5.1
C5.2
C5.3
C6.1
C6.2
C6.3
C6.4
C6.5
C7.1
C7.2
C7.3
C7.4
C7.5
C7.6
L2.1
L7.1
PROJECT CONTACTS
10
.
0
8
.
2
1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
SHEETS ISSUED BY DATE
COMPOST/BIO LOG))))))))))))))))))))
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CERTIFICATION IS FOR ALL SHEETS WITH NUMBERS BEGINNING WITH THE LETTER "C".
RANDALL C HEDLUND, P.E.
LICENSE NUMBER:DATE:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CERTIFICATION IS FOR ALL SHEETS WITH NUMBERS BEGINNING WITH THE LETTER "L".
JOSHUA K. POPEHN, L.L.A.
LICENSE NUMBER:DATE:
19576 03 DEC 2020
44803 03 DEC 2020
D Angle
&And
@ At
100 YR.100 Year Flood Elevation
A.B.Anchor Bolt
A.D.Area Drain
A/C Air Conditioning Unit
ADD.Addendum
ADDL.Additional
ADJ.Adjacent / Adjust
AHU Air Handling Unit
ALT.Alternate
ALUM.Aluminum
ANOD.Anodized
APPROX.Approximate
ARCH Architect / Architectural
AUTO.Automatic
AVG.Average
B.C.Back of Curb
B/W Bottom of Wall
BFE Basement Floor Elevation
BIT Bituminous (Asphaltic)
BLDG Building
BM Benchmark
BSMT.Basement
C.F.Cubic Feet
C.F.S.Cubic Feet Per Second
C.G.Corner Guard
C.J.Control Joint
C.L.Centerline
C.M.U.Concrete Masonry Unit
C.O.Cleanout
C.O.E.U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers
C.Y.Cubic Yards
CB Catch Basin
CBMH Catch Basin Manhole
CEM.Cement
CIP Cast Iron Pipe
CMP Corrugated Metal Pipe
CONC.Concrete (Portland)
CONN.Connection
CONST.Construction
CONT.Continuous
CONTR.Contractor
COP.Copper
CU.Cubic
D.S.Down Spout
DEG.Degree
DEMO.Demolition / Demolish
DEPT.Department
DET.Detail
DIA.Diameter
DIAG.Diagonal
DIM.Dimension
DIP Ductile Iron Pipe
DN Down
DWG.Drawing
E.East
E.J.Expansion Joint
E.O.Emergency Overflow
E.O.S.Emergency Overflow Swale
E.W.Each Way
EA.Each EL.Elevation
ELEC.Electrical
ELEV.Elevation
EMER.Emergency
ENGR.Engineer
ENTR.Entrance
EQ.Equal
EQUIP.Equipment
EQUIV.Equivalent
EXIST.Existing
EXP.Expansion
F & I Furnish and Install
F.B.O.Furnished by Others
F.C.Face of Curb
F.D.Floor Drain
F.D.C.Fire Department Connection
F.V.Field Verify
FB Full Basement
FBWO Full Basement Walk Out
FBLO Full Basement Look Out
FDN.Foundation
FES Flared End Section
FFE Finished Floor Elevation
FLR.Floor
FT. OR (')Foot
FUT.Future
G.B.Grade Break
G.C.General Contractor
GAL.Gallon
GALV.Galvanized
GFE Garage Floor Elevation
GL.Glass
GR.Grade
H.Height
H.P.High Point
HDPEP High Density Polyethylene Pipe
HGT.Height
HORIZ.Horizontal
HVAC Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning
HYD Hydrant
I.D.Inside Dimension OR Identification
I.E. or IE Invert Elevation
IN. OR (")Inches
INFO.Information
INL.Inlet Elevation
INSUL.Insulation
INV.Invert Elevation
JT.Joint
L.F.Linear Feet
L.P.Low Point / Liquid Petroleum
LB.Pound
LGU Local Government Unit
LB.Pound
LB.Longitudinal
LT.Light / Lighting
MAINT.Maintenance
MAS.Masonry
MATL.Material
MAX.Maximum
MECH Mechanical
MED.Medium
MFR.Manufacturer
MH Manhole
MIN.Minimum / Minute
MISC.Miscellaneous
MNDOT Minnesota Department Of Transportation
MOD.Module / Modular
MUL.Mullion
N.North
N.I.C.Not In Contract
NO. OR #Number
NOM Nominal
NTS Not to Scale
NWE Normal Water Elevation
NWL Normal Water Level
O.F.On Center
O.G.Outside Dimension
O.H.Overhead Electric
OH.Overhead
OHWL Ordinary High Water Level
OPNG.Opening
ORIG.Original
P.C.Point of Curvature
P.I.Point of Intersection
PIV Post Indicator Valve
P.L. OR P/L Property Line
P.O.B.Point of Beginning
P.S.F.Pounds Per Square Foot
P.S.I.Pounds Per Square Inch
P.T.Point of Tangency
P.V.C.Point of Vertical Curvature
P.V.I.Point of Vertical Intersection
P.V.T.Point of Vertical Tangency
PE Polyethylene
PED.Pedestal / Pedestrian
PERF.Perforated
PREP.Preparation
PROJ.Project
PROP.Proposed
PVC Poly-Vinyl-Chloride (Piping)
PVMT.Pavement
QTR.Quarter
QTY.Quantity
R Radius
RAD.Radius
RE Rim Elevation (Casting)
R.D.Roof Drain
R.E.Remove Existing
R.O.Rough Opening
R.P.Radius Point
RC Reinforced Concrete Pipe
R.S.Rough Slab
RSD Roof Storm Drain
RE.Regarding
REINF.Reinforced
REQ'D Required
REV.Revision / Revised
RGU Regulatory Government Unit
ROW OR R/W Right of Way
S.South
S.F.Square Feet
SAN.Sanitary Sewer
SECT.Section
SE Split Entry /Side Exit
SEWO Split Entry Walk Out /Side Exit Walk Out
SHT.Sheet
SIM.Similar
SLNT.Sealant
SPEC.Specification
SQ.Square
SSD Subsurface drain
STMH Storm Sewer Manhole
STD.Standard
STRUCT.Structural
SYM.Symmetrical
T Thickness
T/R Top of Rim
T/W Top of Wall
TEMP.Temporary
THK.Thick / Thickness
T.J.Tooled Joint
TNH Top Nut Hydrant
TYP.Typical
U.N.O.Unless Noted Otherwise
V.B.Vapor Barrier
V.C.Vertical Curve
V.I.F.Verify In Field
VER.Verify
VER.Vertical
VEST.Vestibule
W Width
W.PT.Working Point
W.W.F.Welded Wire Fabric
W/With
W/O Without
WO Walk Out
VER.Wetland
WP Waterproof
WETL.Weight
YD.Yard
YR.Year
UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTICFO
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL
CITY REVIEW COMMENTS
REV.PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 09.14.21
RCH
RCH
RCH
2021-08-16
2021-09-23
2021-10-08
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA SOUTH
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
10.07.2021
MEH17003
20
2
1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
10
50
55
MO
H
A
W
K
RO
A
D
HACKMORE RD.
B
A
S
S
LA
K
E
RD
.
HAMEL ROAD
PI
N
T
O
D
R
.
S
E
T
T
L
E
R
S
R
D
.
OL
D
AR
R
O
W
H
E
A
D
D
R
I
V
E
55
101
19
116
47
115
C001MEH003.dwg
CIVIL & LANDSCAPE
TITLE SHEET
C0.1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
CONTACT: MARK SMITH
LANDFORM
105 SOUTH FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 513
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
TEL 612-252-9070
FAX 612-252-9077
CONTACT: RANDY HEDLUND
CIVIL ENGINEER
LANDFORM
105 SOUTH FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 513
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
TEL 612-252-9070
FAX 612-252-9077
CONTACT: LYNN CASWELL
SURVEYOR
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
DR
I
V
E
CHIPPEWA
ROAD
WI
L
L
O
W
X
X
X
(SOUTH OF CHIPPAWA)
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PID: 0211823320012
4250 ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
PID: 0211823320008
4200 ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
CABX
INV=989.61
INV CMP 12
HH
INV=988.56
INV CMP 15 TO STMH
INV=990.15
FES 15 RCP
INV=990.82
FES 15 RCP
INV=984.32
INV CMP 24
CABXINV=984.25
INV CMP 24
CB RECT
RE=991.1INV=988.16
INV E RCP 15INV=988.16
INV CMP 15
HH
CABX
EM
EM
CABX
CABX
C
A
B
X
CA
B
X
HH
GAS
INV=981.53
CMP INV 36
INV=981.87
CMP INV 36
INV=987.80
CMP 12IN INV
INV=988.08
CMP 12IN INV
W
SSMH
RE=1005.5
IE=974.93
INV=1003.07
INV 12IN HDPE CPP
INV=1001.95
INV 12IN HDPE CPP
SSMH
RE=996.8
IE=975.43
SSMH
RE=989.8
IE=976.44
INV=984.36
INV 27 RCP
INV=982.56
INV 27IN RCP
SSMH
RE=988.8
IE=977.27
SSMH
RE=992.6
IE=978.44
INV=984.16
FES 18IN RCP
CBMH CL
RE=992.2
INV=990.14
FES 15IN RCP
UE
UE
OE
OE
OE
OE
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
>
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EX. MH 4A
RIM:982.74
INV:979.88(N)
INV:979.88(E)
INV:979.78(S)
28' L 8" PVC
SDR 26 @ 0.4%
STUB 4C
INV:979.88
EX. MH 3
RIM:990.71
INV:979.25(N)
INV:979.25(W)
INV:979.25(E)
INV:979.15(S)
28' L 8" PVC
SDR 26 @ 0.4%
STUB 4C
INV:979.36
EX. MH 2
RIM:987.30
INV:978.20(N)
INV:978.20(E)
INV:978.10(S)
EX. MH 1
RIM:986.42
INV:977.20(N)
INV:977.20(E)
INV:977.10(S)
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:992.55
INV:976.35
29' L 8" PVC
SDR 26 @ 0.4%
STUB 4C
INV:977.32
29' L 8" PVC
SDR 26 @ 0.4%
STUB 4C
INV:978.31
I
WE
T
L
A
N
D
2
DNR WETLAND 27-493W
SOUTH PORTION
OHW = 980.6
FLOODPLAIN = 981.5
( As of 8/10/20)
17
0
33
33
33
33 33
3333
3333
33
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
e
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
d
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
b
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
g
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:995.01
INL: 982.81 (W)
INV: 974.76 (N)(S)
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3
NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3
468.00
46
8
.
0
0
59
0
.
0
0
S. LINE OF THE N. 1058 FT. OF THE
NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 3
80 LF.
6" PVC
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:984.80
INV:973.56
EX. 6" DIP
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
EX
.
1
0
"
P
V
C
EX
.
1
0
"
P
V
C
EX
.
1
0
"
P
V
C
DNR WETLAND 27-493W
NORTH PORTION
OHW = 978.3
FLOODPLAIN = 979.2
( As of 8/10/20)
980.6
980.
6
980.
6
980.
6
980.
6
980.
6
980
.
6
98
0
.
6
980.6
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1c
WL 1e-1
WL 3
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1f
WE
T
L
A
N
D
4
WE
T
L
A
N
D
5
b
WL
5a
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1a
-
N
o
r
t
h
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1a
-
S
o
u
t
h
WL
1d-1
WL
1d
-
2
WL 1h
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:985.09
INV:972.26
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:985.81
INL:970.64
INV:969.33
INV? CRUSHED 24 CMP
982.7
INV 24 CMP - CRUSHED
983.4
INV=990.47
FES 15 IN PVC
INV=990.09
FES RCP 15 IN
RE=992.02
STMH
RE=999.94
IE=973.16
SSMH
RE=1001.97
IE=973.78
SSMH
MB
INV=1004.06
INV CMP 15 IN
>
>
10
"
P
V
C
8"
P
V
C
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10
"
P
V
C
8"
P
V
C
8" PVC
8" PVC 8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
>
10
"
P
V
C
8"
P
V
C
EX. 6" PVC
RE=982.28
INV 12IN CMPRE=982.70
INV 12IN CMP
EX. 2" JACKED CASING
EX. 12" DIP WATERMAIN
W/12" PLUG
40'
15'
4
10
12
12
N89°42'49"W 2676.18
N0
1
°
1
4
'
2
0
"
E
5
1
8
.
9
6
L=173.73
R=870.89
Δ=11°25'46"
S1
0
°
4
3
'
5
3
"
W
5
3
4
.
3
4
L=29.99
R=170.00
Δ=10°06'25"
30.02
S00°37'28"WS89°23'02"E 493.55
S2
6
°
3
3
'
2
1
"
W
1
4
6
8
.
0
9
S39
°
2
9
'
2
2
"
W
4
8
1
.
8
7
N88°39'29"W 332.51
N69°
5
8
'
2
0
"
W
2
0
1
.
5
5
N69°
5
8
'
2
0
"
W
4
8
3
.
4
8
5.00
N20°01'40"E
12
12
S0
0
°
2
0
'
4
4
"
E
2
6
4
0
.
4
8
Existing Road
Easement
ST-1
EL=990.6
ST-2
EL=990.4
ST-3
EL=987.4
ST-4
EL=983.8
ST-5
EL=982.2
ST-8
EL=986.2
ST-9
EL=981.2
ST-10
EL=981.7
ST-11
EL=997.4
ST-12
EL=990.2
ST-13
EL=991.7
ST-14
EL=988.3
ST-15
EL=989.0
ST-16
EL=990.5
ST-6
EL=984.8
ST-7
EL=983.7
ST-17
EL=982.1
ST-18
EL=982.9
ST-19
EL=983.8
ST-20
EL=982.6
ST-21
EL=982.6
ST-22
EL=985.8
BENCHMARK
TNH=1007.372
BENCHMARK
TNH=998.180
NOTE:
EXISTING HOUSE, DECK AND OUTBUILDINGS
HAVE BEEN DEMOLISHED.
WELL HAS BEEN CAPPED.
SEPTIC AND BEEN PUMPED AND CRUSHED.
NORTH
0 150 300
That part of the South Half of Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying
Northwesterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 01 degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds
East on an assumed bearing along the east line of South half a distance of 833.09 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be
described; thence South 22 degrees 09 minutes 09 seconds West a distance of 86.32 feet; thence Southerly 173. 73 feet along a
tangential curve concave southeasterly, having a central angle of 11 degrees 25 minutes 46 seconds and a radius of 870. 89 feet;
thence South 10 degrees 43 minutes 23 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 534.34 feet; thence southerly 29. 99
feet along a tangential curve concave easterly, having a central angle of 10 degrees 06 minutes 25 seconds and a radius of 170.1
feet; thence South 00 degrees 36 minutes 58 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 30.00 feet to the south line of said
South Half and said line there terminating.
Abstract property
AND
Parcel1:
The Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23, except the West 468 feet thereof,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 2:
That part of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter lying West of a line extending from the Southwest corner of the
Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter to a point on the North line of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter 660 feet
West along said North line from the Northeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, all in Section 3, Township
118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property.
Parcel 3:
Outlot B, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Abstract property
Parcel 4:
The North 468 feet of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118, Range 23,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 5:
The West 468 feet of the South 590 feet of the North 1058 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3,
Township 118 North, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 6:
That part of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23,
lying South of the North 1058 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Property Area = 5,880,542 Sf = 135.00 Ac.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
OT OVERHEAD TELEPHONE
>>
>
POWERPOLE
IRON MONUMENT FOUND
MONUMENT WITH PLASTIC
UTILITY BOX (TV, TEL, ELEC)
1/2" x 14" IRON PIPE
TRAFFIC SIGN
WATER MAIN
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
UNDERGROUND GAS MAIN
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC
FENCING
CONCRETE CURB
MANHOLE
WATER VALVE/CURB STOP
FIRE HYDRANT
FLARED END SECTION
CATCH BASIN
X
HEIGHT, TYPE
G
UT
UE
OE
FO
1 TITLE ITEM NUMBER
I
CAP #13057 SET
CONCRETE SURFACE
BUILDING
BITUMINOUS SURFACE
HEIGHT, TYPE
GRAVEL SURFACE
AIR CONDITIONER
HAND-HOLE
WETLAND
UNDERGROUND CABLE TV
WELL
GUY WIRE
TRANSFORMER
BEARING & DISTANCE
PER PLAT OR DEED
CAST IRON MONUMENT FOUND
PEDESTRIAN RAMP
SITE SYMBOLS
AC
UB
HH
WSO
PLAT EASEMENTPE
BACKGROUND INFORMATION SHOWN IS FROM A SURVEY PERFORMED BY LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES,
MINNEAPOLIS, MN WITH THE LAST DAY OF WORK PERFORMED ON NOVEMBER 4, 2020 EXPRESSLY FOR THIS PROJECT;
CITY OF MEDINA RECORD DRAWINGS; AND UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS. LANDFORM OFFERS NO WARRANTY,
EXPRESSED OR WRITTEN, FOR INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. EXISTING PROJECT CONDITIONS SHALL BE
VERIFIED PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. ERRORS, INCONSISTENCIES, OR OMISSIONS DISCOVERED SHALL BE
REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
1.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
OBTAIN PERMITS FOR DEMOLITION, CLEARING, AND DISPOSAL PRIOR TO BEGINNING.
CONTACT UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS FOR FIELD LOCATION OF SERVICES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING
DEMOLITION AND CLEARING.
SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES THAT MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO
DISTURBANCES TO SITE.
BUILDING DEMOLITION: VERIFY WITH OWNER THAT BUILDING HAS BEEN CLEARED OF REGULATED MATERIALS
REQUIRING SPECIAL HANDLING OR DISPOSAL. REMOVE STRUCTURE, COLUMNS, CANOPIES, FOOTINGS,
FOUNDATIONS, AND ANY ASSOCIATED CONSTRUCTION IN ITS ENTIRETY.
DIMENSIONS SHOWN FOR REMOVAL ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE
APPROPRIATE REMOVAL OF EXISTING FACILITIES.
REFER TO DETAILS FOR PAVEMENT SAWCUT. REMOVE CONCRETE WALKS AND CURBING TO THE NEAREST EXISTING
JOINT BEYOND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
COMPLETE DEMOLITION WITH MINIMAL DISRUPTION OF TRAFFIC. COORDINATE LANE CLOSURES WITH THE
REGULATORY AUTHORITY AND PROVIDE ADVANCE NOTIFICATION TO AFFECTED EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROVIDERS.
PROVIDE BARRICADES, LIGHTS, SIGNS, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND OTHER MEASURES NECESSARY FOR PROTECTION
AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC AND MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.
PROTECT STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, TREES, PLANT MATERIAL, SOD, AND ADJACENT PROPERTY FROM DAMAGE DURING
CONSTRUCTION UNLESS NOTED FOR REMOVAL. DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED TO EQUAL OR BETTER CONDITION AT
NO ADDITIONAL COST.
ABANDON WELLS AND REMOVE ON SITE SEWAGE FACILITIES PRIOR TO ANY OTHER DEMOLITION IN ACCORDANCE
WITH REQUIREMENTS OF REGULATORY AUTHORITIES.
REFER TO TREE PRESERVATION PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
REMOVE EXISTING SITE FEATURES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, PAVING, CURBING,
WALKWAYS, FENCING, RETAINING WALLS, SCREEN WALLS, APRONS, LIGHTING, RELATED FOUNDATIONS, SIGNAGE,
BOLLARDS, LANDSCAPING, AND STAIRWAYS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
COORDINATE REMOVAL, RELOCATION, TERMINATION, AND RE-USE OF EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITY SERVICES AND
APPURTENANCES WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES. RESTORE ELECTRIC HANDHOLES, PULLBOXES, POWERPOLES,
GUYLINES, AND STRUCTURES DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH UTILITY OWNER REQUIREMENTS.
EXISTING PIPING AND CONDUITS MAY BE ABANDONED IN-PLACE IF FILLED WITH SAND AND IF NOT IN LOCATION OF
PROPOSED BUILDING OR IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES. TERMINATE EXISTING SERVICES
AT THE SUPPLY SIDE IN CONFORMANCE WITH PROVIDER'S STANDARDS.
HAUL DEMOLITION DEBRIS OFF-SITE TO A FACILITY APPROVED BY REGULATORY AUTHORITIES FOR THE HANDLING OF
DEMOLITION DEBRIS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
DEMOLITION AND CLEARING NOTES
FO
EXISTING DESCRIPTION EXISTING DESCRIPTION
CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL
CITY REVIEW COMMENTS
REV.PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 09.14.21
RCH
RCH
RCH
2021-08-16
2021-09-23
2021-10-08
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA SOUTH
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
10.07.2021
MEH17003
20
2
1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C101MEH003.dwg
EXISTING CONDITIONS
& DEMOLITION
C1.1
:CURB REMOVAL
:TREE REMOVAL
:STRUCTURE AND/OR PAVEMENT REMOVAL
:CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
:SOIL BORING
B-X
LEGEND
:UTILITY LINE REMOVALXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
:SAWCUT
1.TOP NUT HYDRANT, 725 FEET ± FROM THE CENTERLINES INTERSECTION OF
THE WESTBOUND LANE OF TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 55 AND MOHAWK DRIVE.
WEST SIDE OF MOWHAWK DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 998.180
2.TOP NUT HYDRANT, NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF
CHIPPAWA ROAD AND HACKAMORE DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 1007.372
BENCHMARK
>>
STM
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
)))))
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
))))))
)
))))))
)
26
25 24
23
7
8
9
432
3
1
2 1
4
2
3
BLK 6
1
7
8 9
10
5
BLK 1
4
19 20 21 22 23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
CHIPPEWA ROAD
33 BLK 9
-0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00
-0+22 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00
5+00
10+
0
0
11
+
0
0
12
+
0
0
13
+
0
0
14
+
0
0
15
+
0
0
15
+
5
0
.
4
8
-0+50 0+00 1+00
2+
0
0
3+
0
0
4+
0
0
5+
0
0
6+
0
0
7+
0
0
7+
5
2
.
2
5
-0+20 0+00
1+00
2+
0
0
3+00
4+00
4+61.32
POND
(9P)
BTM = 976.00
NWL = 985.00
HWL = 987.11
FILTRATION
BASIN (16P)
BTM = 984.50
HWL = 987.61
POND
(14P)
BTM = 975.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 986.49
LEAPING DEER
WETLAND 5b
W
E
T
5
a
H
W
L
=
9
8
3
.
3
7
1
0
0
-
Y
R
B
-
B
=
9
8
5
.
9
3
WETLAND 1f
HWL =
985.16
POND 3
HWL =
991.07
WETLAND 2
HWL = 986.27
LANE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
40'
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
FOREBAY
(13P)
BTM = 979.00
NWL = 986.00
HWL = 987.91
5
0
'
50
'
25
'
35'25
'
25
'
25'
35'
25'
35
'
2
5
'
50'
15'
3
0
'
50'
59'
BLK
3BR
O
O
K
V
I
E
W
LA
N
E
38
39
40
33
'
38'
2
0
'
OU
T
L
O
T
F
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT E
>>
STM
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
W
>>
OE
OE
WE
T
L
A
N
D
2
33 33
3333
33
WETLAND
1
e
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
g
468.00
46
8
.
0
0
>>
WL 3
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1f
WL
5a
ST-11
EL=997.4
ST-12
EL=990.2
ST-13
EL=991.7
ST-14
EL=988.3
ST-15
EL=989.0
ST-22
EL=985.8
L.P.H.P.
L.P.
H.P.
CL CL
L.
P
.
%6.1
%5.4
%
7.6
%
6.2
%
8.
7
%5.0
L.P.
EO
F
L.P
.
2+00
EO
F
L.
P
.
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
%8.0
%8.0
%
7.
9 %
6.
8
%
6.
6
%9.2
GF = 994.5
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
GF
=
9
9
3
.
5
CL CL
90.13
EX.CL
994.86
EX.CL
993.17
H.P.
90
.
2
8
%5.0
%8.4
%8.4
%8.5
%3.8
DR
P
1C
92.3
89.1
88.5
96.5
%
6.2
96
.
0
91.092.0
94
.
0
90.3
92
.
5
89.3
GF
=
9
9
2
.
5
GF =
9
9
3
.
0
88.0
88.0
88.3
88.3
%
1.
0
987.0
994.0
986.0
986.0
%1.0 %1.9 %1.0
%0.5
%
2.2
G.
B
.
%
2.
9
91
.
7
8
%
4.
1
%
1.
7
4
94.54
89
.
5
4
91.7
89.4
95.8
89.5
97.5 95.1
89.5
95.5
88.5
94.2
91.9
89.3
94.7
95.1
94.5
95.0
95.5
92.6
94.0
91.1
92.8
85.5
86.0
87.0
87.5
90
.
7
90.0
%
3.0
%
4
.
2
%
4.4
9
5
.
2
9
5
.
7
95
.
0
95
.
9
95
.
5
CL CL
94.1
93.5
92.7 91.2
90.3
90.4
93.1
91.1
94
.
5
97.
5
86.5
89.5
87.5
88.
0
88.2
87.7
L.P.
91.9
0
%2.8
%
0.
6
H.
P
.
93
.
8
5
93.34
93.33
%
1.
0
L.P
.
92
.
4
0
%
2.
0
%2.0
91.1
8
L.P.
%
1.
0
93.43
H.P.%1.0
%5.3
%3.8
%5.3
%2.2
%5.1
%
8.
1
%
5.6
%1.6
%4.7
%
7
.
0
%
1
.
2
5
%
3
.
3
%
4
.
6
%2.3
87.
8
8
8
.
1
85
.
9
83
.
7
86.1
84.0
82.2
82.4
8
4
.
8
86.
5
87.0
87.0 86.3
8
5
.
0
8
5
.
0
8
4
.
5
86.0
86.5
88.0
87.5
85.
7
86.
0
8
8
.
0
EOF
E
O
F
87.8
EO
F
87
.
5
E
O
F
%2.0 %2.0
CL CL
VM
A
%
8.
0
E
O
F
8
9
.
5
%0.5
88.1
88
.
1
88.1
88.1
8
8
.
1
85.9
VM
A
VM
A
G
B
%
3.0
VMA
8
8
.
5
GF=993.0
990.3
SEWO
989.8
G
F
=
9
9
6
.
0
9
8
8
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
8
8
.
0
GF=994.5
991.3
SEWO
990.8
GF
=
9
9
7
.
0
98
9
.
5
FB
W
O
98
9
.
0
GF=996.5
889.0
FBLO
991.5
GF=997.5
890.0
FBLO
992.5
GF
=
9
9
6
.
2
FB
W
O
98
8
.
2
GF=99
6
.
7
989.2FBWO
988.7
GF
=
9
9
6
.
5
989
.
0
FB
W
O
98
8
.
5
GF
=
9
9
8
.
0
99
0
.
5
FB
W
O
99
0
.
0
GF
=
9
9
2
.
8
99
0
.
1
SE
W
O
98
9
.
6
GF
=
9
9
8
.
0
99
0
.
5
FB
W
O
99
0
.
0
GF
=
9
9
7
.
0
98
9
.
5
FB
W
O
98
9
.
0
FB
W
O
988.
5 GF=9
9
6
.
8
989.
3
FBW
O
988.
8
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
98
7
.
0
FB
W
O
98
6
.
5
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
0
9
9
0
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
9
0
.
0
GF
=
9
9
5
.
4
987.
9
FB
W
O
987.
4
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
0
9
9
0
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
9
0
.
0
GF
=
9
9
5
.
5
98
8
.
0
FB
W
O
98
7
.
5
GF
=
9
9
6
.
0
98
8
.
5
FB
W
O
98
8
.
0
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
98
7
.
0
FB
W
O
98
6
.
5
99
3
.
3
98
6
.
5
FB
W
O
98
6
.
0
88.5
96.5
88.5
96.3
86.
1
85.4
986
990
988
988
988
988
99
2
98
6
982
986
98
6
986
988
990
990990
990
979
980
982
984986
992
990
987
988
99
2
99
2
99
0
99
0
9
8
5
98
4
982 980 978 978
986
985
984
982
980
978
92
.
3
9
986 988
988
986
98
6
98
8
98
8
9
8
6
98
8
9
8
8
9
8
6
984
988
986
%
6
.
6
%.6
988
988
9
8
8
9
8
6
988
992
992994
992
994
9
9
2
988
992
988
990
98
8
98
6
994
992
990
990
990
992
9
8
6
99
0
98
6
9
8
6
992
99
4
99
6
996
99
4
9
8
6
98
8
9
8
6
986
990
98
6
990
99
0
990
990
990
994
9
9
4
99
0
99
0
990
992
98
6
98
6
99
2
986
9
9
2
9
8
6
99
0
994
996
9
9
0
99
4
9
8
4
9
8
8
988
98
8
992
99
0
990
98
8
9
8
8
9
8
8
988987
98
5
984
9
8
7
990
98
8
992
992
98
4
99
2
9
9
4
9
9
4
994
98
8
98
6
98
4
.
5
9
8
6
9
8
8
986 986
990 994
98
8
98
6
988
994
98
8
97
6
97
8
98
0
98
2
98
3
98
4
985
98
5
986 985
984
986
99
4
99
2
99
2
99
4
99
6
98
6
98
8
99
0
988
990
988994
992
990
988
986
984
9
9
2
98
4
986
9
8
8
9
8
8
9
8
8
986
EO
F
EOF
TW=985.5
BW=984.0
TW=985.5
BW=980.0
TW=985.5
BW=980.0
TW=985.5
BW=982.0
C7.1
6
FES EROSION
CONTROL (TYP)
C7.1
9&10
TEMPORARY
COMPOST BIO LOG
ENKAMAT (TYP)
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
3,4&5
INLET
PROTECTION
C7.1
3,4&5
INLET
PROTECTION
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
LEAPING LANE
C7.1
1
SILT
FENCE
C7.1
6
FES EROSION
CONTROL (TYP)
ENTRANCE C7.1
9&10
TEMPORARY
COMPOST BIO LOG
BLANKET
FUTU
R
E
A
R
E
A
MO
H
A
W
K
R
O
A
D
DR
I
V
E
HI
L
L
S
I
D
E
DEER
NORTH
0 50 100
CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL
CITY REVIEW COMMENTS
REV.PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 09.14.21
RCH
RCH
RCH
2021-08-16
2021-09-23
2021-10-08
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA SOUTH
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
10.07.2021
MEH17003
20
2
1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C301MEH003.dwg
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
C3.1
:Inlet Protection
nn
:Silt Fence
:Pavement Sawcut
:Construction Limits
:Vehicle Tracking Pad
47 Each
3 Each
21740 Feet
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
:Compost or Bio Log 855 Feet)))))))))))))
:Erosion Control Blanket 12000 S.Y.
NO SCALE
TYPICAL LOT DETAIL
NOTES:
1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY.
: REAR ELEVATION
: BUILDING TYPE - (CUSTOM GRADING BY BUILDER)
: MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION
: FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
: DRP 1' DENOTES DISTANCE GARAGE
FLOOR IS DROPPED FROM TYPICAL.
DRP
1'
MAIN STREET
BLK 1
5
X 105.0 X 105.0
X
106.5
X
106.5
DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNER
ELEVATIONS
DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT
20' FRONT
10' SIDE
10' REAR
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE
DENOTES BUILDING
SETBACKS
BUILDING TYPES:
FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALK OUT
FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT
SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT
FB = FULL BASEMENT
DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW
4.
5
%
DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPE
(CG)
108.3
FB
100.0
GF=108.5
GENERAL NOTES
FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070.
SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELM CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION (ECWMC).
1.
2.
LEGEND
ESTIMATED QUANTITYSYMBOLDESCRIPTION
910
908
:MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
GRADING NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR GRADING NOTES
EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES.
SEE SHEET C3.2
:Heavy Duty Silt Fence 17689 Feet
:Wetland Impact Area
:Flood Plain Impact Area
:Flood Plain Mitigation Area
SE
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
3
.
3
1
HH
CABX
CABX
CABX
C
A
B
X
CAB
X
HH
INV=981.53
CMP INV 36
INV=981.87
CMP INV 36
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OT
V
O
T
V
>>
33
33
33
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
g
>>
980.
6
980.
6
WE
T
L
A
N
D
4
WE
T
L
A
N
D
5
b
WL 1h
ST-14
EL=988.3
ST-16
EL=990.5RE=982.28
INV 12IN CMP
RE=982.70
INV 12IN CMP
STM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
STM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
))))
)
)
)
))))
)
)
)
))))
%
4.5
H.P
.
-0+0
0
1
+
0
0
2+00
3
+
0
0
3+14
.
7
3
L.P.
%
5.2
%
7.
1
%
7
.
1
%
7
.
5
%
7
.
1
%
7.
4
%
5.
0
%
7.1
%
4.8
%
5.
6
%
5
.
1
%
5
.
6
EX.CL
CL
C
L
990.50
EX.CL
994.86
88.12
93
.
5
8
%1.0
%1.0
93
.
6
1
%
1.2
5
90
.
7
92.2
90.0
93.8
93.9
94.
5
93.5
94.
0
92.6
93.
5
86
.
0
92
.
1
93
.
0
89
.
0
9
2
.
7
x
x
x
x
93.
3
9
2
.
6
95.
1
93.8
9
0
.
9
91.8
8
9
.
1
9
0
.
5
8
8
.
5
90.3
9
0
.
5
90.3
89.6
88.9
91.
7
9
0
.
7
87.5
92.8
9
9
4
.
1
90.5
92.0
90.5
94.
9
4
H.P
.
%
1.0
%
1.3
G.B
.
%
1.0
95
.
7
93.7
%
5.3
%
4.0
%3.2
%
3.0
%
4
.
2
%
4.4
%
4.8
94
.
5
95.
0
95.
7
95.295.7
9
5
.
2
9
5
.
7
95
.
0
95
.
9
94
.
7
95
.
5
87.5
87.7
87.7
87.7 87.7
L.P.
91.9
0
%2.8
82.4
82.
9
84.
2
84.
0
85.
7
87
.
5
96.
1
9
7
.
8
9
7
.
9
8
9
.
0
8
6
.
5
8
5
.
6
86.1
86.
1
86.
1
86.3
87.5
8
6
.
0
8
6
.
7
86.4
8
4
.
8
8
5
.
0
8
4
.
5
94.0
6
86
.
7
86
.
7
86
.
7
86.
7
86.
7
86.7
86
.
2
E
O
F
87.
3
0
E
O
F
L.P
.
H.P
.
%
2.9
92.5
5
%
1.0
91.
8
0
%
1.2
5
%
3.3
VM
A
%
8.
0
E
O
F
V
M
A
2.0%
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
DRO
P
1C
2.0%
2.0%
>
>
>
>
>
>
DRO
P
2C
DR
O
P
2C
GF
=
9
9
6
.
0
988
.
5
FB
W
O
988
.
0
GF
=
9
9
6
.
2
98
8
.
7
FB
W
O
98
8
.
2
GF=99
6
.
7
989.2FBWO
988.7
GF=
9
9
1
.
2
988
.
5SEW
O988
.
0
GF
=
9
9
6
.
5
989
.
0
FB
W
O
988
.
5
GF=991
.
0
983.5
FB
990.8
GF
=
9
9
5
.
0
98
7
.
5
FB
W
O
98
7
.
0
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
98
7
.
0
FB
W
O
98
6
.
5
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
98
7
.
0
FB
L
O
98
9
.
5
GF=
9
9
4
.
0
986
.
5
FB
993
.
8
GF=
9
9
5
.
1
988
.
3
FB
995
.
6
GF=
9
9
4
.
5
987
.
0
FB
994
.
3
GF=
9
9
2
.
5
985.
0
FB
992.
3
GF=991.0
983.5
FB
990.8
GF
=
9
9
6
.
2
988
.
7
FB
W
O
988
.
2
G
F
=
9
9
6
.
2
9
8
8
.
7
F
B
W
O
9
8
8
.
2
GF
=
9
9
6
.
2
988
.
7
FB
W
O
98
8
.
2
GF
=
9
9
5
.
0
98
7
.
5
FB
W
O
98
7
.
0
GF=
9
9
4
.
6
988
.
5FBL
O991
.
0
GF=
9
9
4
.
6
988
.
5FB
L
O991
.
0
9
4
.
2
%
0
.
6
%.6
94.
9
5
9
9
4
98
8
988
988
99
0
990
98
8
986
986
986
984
982
980
98
6
980
982
984
992
98
0
98
4
98
6
988
9
8
4
984
988
988
992
98
6
99
4
99
4
9
9
2
98
6
986
986
98
6
988
988
99
2
978
984
983
982
980
978
976 976
980
983
984
985
98
6
986
98
5
98
4
98
3
980
976
975
978
980
982983
984
986
988
985
98
5
98
7
9
8
5
98
6
9
8
6
98
7
9
8
7
99
2
990
990
994
994
994
9
9
4
994
990
994
994
988
98
6
9
9
0
97
7
975
992
984
983.5
994
EO
F
E
O
F
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
OUTLOT B
7
6
5
3
4
2
1
8
9
BLK
4
BLK 5
1
2
3
45
6
7 10
10
-0+2
8
0+0
0
1+0
0
2+0
0
2+3
7
.
0
2
-0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00
3+00
4+00
5+0
0
6+0
0
7+
0
0
8+
0
0
9+
0
0
-0+50 0+00 1+00
POND
(18P)
BTM = 978.00
NWL = 986.00
HWL = 987.42
IRRIGATION
POND
(20P)
BTM = 975.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 986.33
OUTLOT C
WET 1h
HWL = 983.89
WET 4
HWL = 985.01
WETLAND 5b
HWL = 983.37
100-YR B-B = 985.43
OUTLOT D
25
'
35
'
35
'
50'
50'
50
'
B
U
F
F
E
R
3
0
'
30'
25
'
25'
25'
25'
42'
38
'
C7.1
3,4&5
INLET
PROTECTION
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
1
SILT FENCE
MO
H
A
W
K
R
O
A
D
C7.1
8
EROSION
CONTROL
BLANKET
DR
I
V
E
HILL
S
I
D
E
BR
O
O
K
V
I
E
W
C
O
U
R
T
C7.1
7
ROCK
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
C7.1
3, 4 & 5
INLET
PROTECTION
C7.1
3,4&5
INLET
PROTECTION
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
1
SILT
FENCE
C7.1
6
FES EROSION
CONTROL (TYP)
C7.1
9&10
TEMPORARY
COMPOST
BIO LOG
OHW
C7.1
7
ROCK
CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
DNR WETLAND 27-493W
SOUTH PORTION
OHW = 980.6
FLOODPLAIN = 981.5
( As of 8/10/20)
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1a
-
S
o
u
t
h
PROPOSED 100-YR
HWL = 981.83
NORTH
0 50 100
CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL
CITY REVIEW COMMENTS
REV.PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 09.14.21
RCH
RCH
RCH
2021-08-16
2021-09-23
2021-10-08
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA SOUTH
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
10.07.2021
MEH17003
20
2
1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C302MEH003.dwg
GRADING , DRAINAGE AND
EROSION CONTROL
C3.2
:Inlet Protection
nn
:Silt Fence
:Pavement Sawcut
:Construction Limits
:Vehicle Tracking Pad
47 Each
3 Each
21740 Feet
:Compost or Bio Log 855 Feet)))))))))))))
:Erosion Control Blanket 12000 S.Y.
NO SCALE
TYPICAL LOT DETAIL1
NOTES:
1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY.
: REAR ELEVATION
: BUILDING TYPE - (CUSTOM GRADING BY BUILDER)
: MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION
: FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
: DRP 1' DENOTES DISTANCE GARAGE
FLOOR IS DROPPED FROM TYPICAL.
DRP
1'
MAIN STREET
BLK 1
5
X 105.0 X 105.0
X
106.5
X
106.5
DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNER
ELEVATIONS
DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT
20' FRONT
10' SIDE
10' REAR
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE
DENOTES BUILDING
SETBACKS
BUILDING TYPES:
FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALK OUT
FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT
SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT
FB = FULL BASEMENT
DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW
4.
5
%
DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPE
(CG)
108.3
FB
100.0
GF=108.5
GENERAL NOTES
FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070.
SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELM CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION (ECWMC).
1.
2.
LEGEND
ESTIMATED QUANTITYSYMBOLDESCRIPTION
910
908
:MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
GRADING NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR GRADING NOTES
EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.8 FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES.
:Heavy Duty Silt Fence 17000 Feet
:Wetland Impact Area
SEE SHEET C3.1
:Flood Plain Impact Area
:Flood Plain Mitigation Area
STM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
STM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
)))
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
)))))
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
g
980.
6
980.6
ST-12
EL=990.2
ST-13
EL=991.7
ST-15
EL=989.0
H.P.
%
7.6
%
6.2
%
2.7
%
8.
7
%5.0
L.P.
L.P
.
EO
F
L.
P
.
%8.0
%8.0
%
7.
9 %
6.
8
%
6.
6
%9.2
CL CL
90.13
H.P.
90
.
2
8
%5.0
%8.4
%8.4
%8.5
%3.8
DR
P
1C
92.3
96.5
%
6.2
96
.
0
91.092.0
94
.
0
90.3
92
.
5
89.3
%1.0
%0.5 %0.55
%
2.2
G.
B
.
%
2.
9
91
.
7
8
%
4.
1
%
1.
7
4
94.54
89
.
5
4
91.7
89.4
95.8
97.5 95.1
95.5
94.2
91.9
89.3
94.7
95.1
94.5
95.0
95.5
92.6
94.0
91.
1
92.8
85.5
86.0
87.0
87.5
90
.
7
92.2
90.
0
CL CL
94.1
93.5
92.7 91.2
90.3
90.4
93.1
91.1
94
.
3
95.
8
94
.
5
95.
5
96.
0
95.
2
97.
5
%
7.4
95
.
9
97
.
5
%
5.
9
9
7
.
5
9
6
.
2
%
4
.
8
96.
6
98.0
%5.3
96.4
96.5
%
2.0
86.5
89.5
90.
0
90.0
988.0
87.5
84.0
85.
8
8
4
.
3
8
5
.
9
82.2
82.5
85.0
81.9
87.
8
8
8
.
1
8
5
.
9
83
.
7
86.1
84.0
82.2
82.4
82.
9
8
8
.
0
EOF
%2.0 %2.0
%
1.
0
%
1.
5
%
3.3
E
O
F
89.5
8
9
.
5
%0.5
85.9
VM
A
G
B
%
3.0
82.2
8
8
.
5
GF=993.0
990.3
SEWO
989.8
G
F
=
9
9
7
.
0
9
8
9
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
8
9
.
0
G
F
=
9
9
6
.
5
98
9
.
0
F
B
W
O
9
8
8
.
5
G
F
=
9
9
6
.
0
98
8
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
8
8
.
0
GF=994.5
991.3
SEWO
990.8
GF
=
9
9
7
.
0
98
9
.
5
FB
W
O
98
9
.
0
GF=996.5
889.0
FBLO
991.5
GF=997.5
890.0
FBLO
992.5
GF
=
9
9
8
.
0
99
0
.
5
FB
W
O
99
0
.
0
GF
=
9
9
2
.
8
99
0
.
1
SE
W
O
98
9
.
6
GF
=
9
9
8
.
0
99
0
.
5
FB
W
O
99
0
.
0
GF
=
9
9
7
.
0
98
9
.
5
FB
W
O
98
9
.
0
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
0
9
9
0
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
9
0
.
0
GF=
9
9
5
.
4
987.
9
FB
W
O
987.
4
GF=998.0
990.5
FBWO
990.0
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
0
9
9
0
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
9
0
.
0
GF
=
9
9
8
.
5
99
1
.
0
FB
W
O
99
0
.
5
GF=
9
9
8
.
5
991
.
0
FBW
O
990
.
5
GF
=
9
9
5
.
5
98
8
.
0
FB
W
O
98
7
.
5
GF
=
9
9
6
.
0
98
8
.
5
FB
W
O
98
8
.
0
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
98
7
.
0
FB
W
O
98
6
.
5
99
3
.
3
98
6
.
5
FB
W
O
98
6
.
0
GF
=
9
9
5
.
0
98
7
.
5
FB
W
O
98
7
.
0
88.5
96.3
988
988
988
982 982
990
990
990
990
986988
988
9
8
8
9
8
6
992994
992
994
9
9
2
988
992
988
990
98
8
988
994
992
990
990
990
992
9
8
6
99
0
986
98
6
9
8
4
992
990
990
990
98
6
98
6
99
2
986
9
9
2
998
9
9
8
9
9
2
992
99
4
9
8
6
99
0
9
8
4
9
8
8
988
992
99
0
990
98
8
9
9
2
9
8
8
9
8
8
988987
98
5
984
9
8
7
990
98
8
98
4
986 986
990 994
9
9
6
9
9
6
98
8
990
990
99
0
98
8
98
6
988
990
996
994
98
8
97
6
97
8
98
0
98
2
98
3
98
4
985
98
5
986 985
984
986
98
6
98
8
99
0
988
990
98
4
98
6
98
2
98
2
98
1
.
5
9
8
1
.
5
98
2
982
EO
F
EOF
TW=985.5
BW=984.0
TW=985.5
BW=980.0
TW=985.5
BW=980.0
TW=985.5
BW=982.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
BLK 2
432
3
1
2 1
4
2
3
1
5
BLK 1
4
-0+22 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00
5+00
6+
0
0
7
+
0
0
7
+
0
9
.
4
2
9+
0
0
10
+
0
0
11
+
0
0
12
+
0
0
13
+
0
0
14
+
0
0
15
+
0
0
15
+
5
0
.
4
8
POND
(14P)
BTM = 975.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 986.49
FOREBAY
(13P)
BTM = 979.00
NWL = 986.00
HWL = 987.91
1
6
8
'
172'
5
0
'
50
'
25
'
35'
35
'
2
5
'
50'
30'
3
0
'
50'
3
0
'
59'
5
0
'
BLK
3
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
1
SILT
FENCE
C7.1
6
FES EROSION
CONTROL (TYP)
LEAPING DEER
C7.1
9&10
TEMPORARY
COMPOST
BIO LOG
LANE
HI
L
L
S
I
D
E
DR
I
V
E
C7.1
3,4&5
INLET
PROTECTION
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
1
SILT
FENCE
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
1
SILT
FENCE
C7.1
9&10
TEMPORARY
COMPOST
BIO LOG
NORTH
0 50 100
CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL
CITY REVIEW COMMENTS
REV.PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 09.14.21
RCH
RCH
RCH
2021-08-16
2021-09-23
2021-10-08
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA SOUTH
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
10.07.2021
MEH17003
20
2
1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C303MEH003.dwg
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
C3.3
:Inlet Protection
nn
:Silt Fence
:Pavement Sawcut
:Construction Limits
:Vehicle Tracking Pad
47 Each
3 Each
21740 Feet
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
:Compost or Bio Log 855 Feet)))))))))))))
:Erosion Control Blanket 12000 S.Y.
NO SCALE
TYPICAL LOT DETAIL1
NOTES:
1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY.
: REAR ELEVATION
: BUILDING TYPE - (CUSTOM GRADING BY BUILDER)
: MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION
: FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
: DRP 1' DENOTES DISTANCE GARAGE
FLOOR IS DROPPED FROM TYPICAL.
DRP
1'
MAIN STREET
BLK 1
5
X 105.0 X 105.0
X
106.5
X
106.5
DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNER
ELEVATIONS
DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT
20' FRONT
10' SIDE
10' REAR
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE
DENOTES BUILDING
SETBACKS
BUILDING TYPES:
FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALK OUT
FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT
SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT
FB = FULL BASEMENT
DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW
4.
5
%
DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPE
(CG)
108.3
FB
100.0
GF=108.5
GENERAL NOTES
FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070.
SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELM CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION (ECWMC).
1.
2.
LEGEND
ESTIMATED QUANTITYSYMBOLDESCRIPTION
910
908
:MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
GRADING NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR GRADING NOTES
EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES.
:Heavy Duty Silt Fence 17689 Feet
:Wetland Impact Area
:Flood Plain Impact Area
:Flood Plain Mitigation Area
SE
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
3
.
1
0+
0
0
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
BLK 2
7
6
5
3
4
2
1
8
9
432
3
1
2 1
4
2
3
BLK 6
BLK
4
BLK 5
1
1
2
3
45
6
7
9
10
10
5
BLK 1
4
-0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
15+00
16+00
-0+22 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00
5+00
6+
0
0
7
+
0
0
7
+
0
9
.
4
2
-0+2
8
0+0
0
1+0
0
2+0
0
2+3
7
.
0
2
-0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00
3+00
4+00
5+0
0
6+0
0
7+
0
0
8+
0
0
9+
0
0
10+
0
0
11
+
0
0
12
+
0
0
13
+
0
0
14
+
0
0
15
+
0
0
15
+
5
0
.
4
8
FILTRATION
BASIN (16P)
BTM = 984.50
HWL = 987.61
POND
(18P)
BTM = 978.00
NWL = 986.00
HWL = 987.42
IRRIGATION
POND
(20P)
BTM = 975.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 986.33
POND
(14P)
BTM = 975.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 986.49
PROPOSED 100-YR
HWL = 981.83
OUTLOT C
WET 1h
HWL = 983.89
WETLAND 5b
HWL = 983.37
100-YR B-B = 985.43
W
E
T
5
a
H
W
L
=
9
8
3
.
3
7
1
0
0
-
Y
R
B
-
B
=
9
8
5
.
9
3
WETLAND 1f
HWL =
985.16
POND 3
HWL =
991.07
FOREBAY
(13P)
BTM = 979.00
NWL = 986.00
HWL = 987.91
BLK
3
40
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT E
CABX
OE
OE
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>
I
33
33 33
3333
33
468.00
46
8
.
0
0
59
0
.
0
0
980.
6
980.6
ST-11
EL=997.4
ST-12EL=990.2
ST-13
EL=991.7
ST-14
EL=988.3
ST-15
EL=989.0
ST-16
EL=990.5
>
>
>
>>
STM
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
SANSAN
12" WAT.
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
SA
N
>>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>
>
8" WAT.
8" WAT
.
8" W
A
T
.
8"
W
A
T
.
8"
W
A
T
.
8" WAT.
8"
W
A
T
.
8"
W
A
T
.
8"
W
A
T
.
8"
W
A
T
.
SAN
SAN
SAN
SA
N
SAN
S
A
N
SA
N
SAN
SA
N
SA
N
SAN
8"
W
A
T
.
8"
W
A
T
.
8" W
A
T
.
12" WA
T
.
>>MH 2
STUB 8"
WATER
CO
N
N
E
C
T
W
I
T
H
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
OF
C
H
I
P
P
A
W
A
R
O
A
D
FES 1202A
CBMH 1202CBMH 1203
FES 1203A
FES 1200
OCS 5
FES 5
FES 1802
FES 1800
STMH 1801
FES 1301D
CB 1301C
CBMH 1301B
CB 1301A
CBMH 1301ACBMH 1301
FES 1300
STMH 1302
CBMH 1303
CBMH 1304
CBMH 1305
CB 1305A
CB 1503B
CBMH 1503
CB 1503A
CBMH 1502
FES 1500
CBMH 1501
CBMH 1501A
CB 1501B
FES 1601
FES 1600
BOX CULVERT 1
BOX CULVERT 2
BOX CULVERT 3
BOX CULVERT 4
BOX CULVERT 5
MH 33
MH 32
MH 34 MH 35
MH 36
MH 31
MH 30
MH 38
MH 37
MH 29
MH 28
MH 27
MH 26
OCS 7
FES 7
OCS 6FES 6
OCS 8
FES 8
STMH 1201
LANE
LEAPING DEER
HILLSIDE
DR
I
V
E
BR
O
O
K
V
I
E
W
C
O
U
R
T
CHIPPEWA ROAD
FES 10
OCS 10
CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL
CITY REVIEW COMMENTS
REV.PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 09.14.21
RCH
RCH
RCH
2021-08-16
2021-09-23
2021-10-08
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA SOUTH
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
10.07.2021
MEH17003
20
2
1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
NORTH
0 100 200
Pipe Materials
Watermain 6" DIP Class 52-Hydrant Leads, 8" PVC C900 & 12" PVC C900 -Main Lines
(ANSI A21.51/AWWA C151)
Water Service 1" Copper Type K (ASTM B88) Curb Stop shall be adjusted to an elevation
of 2" below finished grade. See detail SER-01.
Sanitary Sewer 8" PVC SDR 35 (ASTM: D3034, D2665, & F891)
Sanitary Sewer Service 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 (ASTM: D1785, D3034, D2665, & F891)
Storm Sewer RCP 12"-18" CLASS 5 (ASTM C76)
RCP 21" CLASS 4 (ASTM C76)
RCP 24"-48" CLASS 3 (ASTM C76)
Draintile 6" Perforated Polyethylene Draintile 1' Behind Curb with a 6"x4" Tee & 4" PVC To
Property Line For Home Sump Pump Connection
Contact Utility Service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning.
Contractor to field verify location and elevation of all utility points of connection prior to construction of any proposed utilities. Contractor to
notify Engineer immediately if there is any discrepancy.
Contractor to pothole all utility crossings prior to construction of new utilities to verify depths of existing lines. Contact Engineer immediately
if any conflicts are discovered.
Provide means and measures to protect adjacent property from damage during utility installation.
Pipe lengths shown are from center of structure to center of structure or end of end section.
Install tracer wire with all non-conductive utilities in accordance with City of Medina Standards.
Connect to City Utilities in accordance with City of Medina Standards.
Contact Steve Scherer, City of Medina Public Works Department, at 763.473.8842 for Wet Tap inspection.
Maintain 7.5 Feet of cover on water.
Deflect water to maintain 18-inch minimum outside separation at sewer crossings. Center pipe lengths to provide greatest separation
between joints.
Contact Steve Scherer, City of Medina Public Works Department, at 763.473.8842 for flushing and pressure test inspections.
All joints and connections in the storm sewer system shall be gastight or water tight. Approved resilient rubber joints must be used to make
watertight connections to manholes, catch basins, and other structures.
Catch basins in curb and gutter are sumped 2 inches below the gutter grade. Refer to Detail STR-03 & STR-04 on Sheet C7.X.
Irrigation sleeve to be 4" Schedule 80 PVC buried 24" below grade. Extend sleeves 3' beyond the edge of pavement. Mark each end of
sleeve with 3/4" rebar 12" below finish grade. (coordinate with irrigation contractor.)
Compact cohesive soils in paved areas to 95% of maximum dry density, Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) except the top 3 feet which shall
be compacted to 100%. compact to 98% density where fill depth exceeds 10 feet. The soils shall be within 3% of optimum moisture
content. In granular soils all portions of the embankment shall be compacted to not less than 95% of Modified Proctor Density (ASTM
D1557).
Adjust structures to final grade where disturbed. Comply with requirements of Utility. Meet requirements for traffic loading in paved areas.
Rock media in infiltration or filtration systems shall be angular, non calcareous rock.
Coordinate with private utilities to provide electric, natural gas, and communications services.
Televise sanitary sewer following installation per City guidelines
Refer to the C3.1 sheet notes for requirements.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
GENERAL NOTES
UTILITY NOTES
For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1.
C400MEH003.dwg
UTILITY SCHEMATIC /UTILITY NOTES/
SERVICE & STORM SCHEDULE
C4.0
INFILTRATION / FILTRATION BASIN REQUIREMENTS
STORM SEWER SCHEDULE
NUMBER DIAM.CASTING
STREET NOTES
Spot Elevations at curblines indicate flowlines unless noted otherwise. See Sheets C5.1 thru C5.4 for rim elevations of catch basins.
Grades between proposed spot elevations shall be continuous and nonvariable. Spot Elevations shall govern over contour lines.
Meet and Match existing curb. Transition as needed.
Concrete Joints
Install joints as shown and align across sidewalks, curbs, and pavement, paying attention to spacing of expansion joints.
Joint spacing shall be as follows:
a. Tooled joints: Divide panels into nominally equal areas unless shown otherwise.
b. Expansion Joints: Sidewalks - 40 feet max.; Curbs - 60 feet max.; Pavement: 80 feet max.; Adjacent to building
foundations and stoops.
c. Contraction Joints: Sidewalks - 8 to 10 feet; Curbs and Aprons - 12 to 15 feet.
Accessible parking stalls and adjacent access aisles shall not exceed a 2.00% slope in any direction.
Accessible Routes shall have a maximum cross slope of 2.00% and a maximum running slope of 5.00%.
Adjust all structure rims to match pavement elevations.
Curb and gutter at all intersections shall be B-618
Surrmountable curb and gutter on streets
Refer to sheets C6.1 thru C6.5 for street sections.
DETAIL
SERVICE SCHEDULE (SOUTH)
1.TOP NUT HYDRANT, 725 FEET ± FROM THE CENTERLINES INTERSECTION OF THE WESTBOUND LANE OF TRUNK
HIGHWAY NO. 55 AND MOHAWK DRIVE. WEST SIDE OF MOWHAWK DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 998.180
2.TOP NUT HYDRANT, NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF CHIPPAWA ROAD AND HACKAMORE DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 1007.372
BENCHMARK
STMH 1201
CBMH 1202
CBMH 1203
CBMH 1301 (SUMP)
CBMH 1301A
CB 1301A
CBMH 1301B
CBMH 1301C
STMH 1302
CBMH 1303
CBMH 1304
CBMH 1305
CB 1305A
CBMH 1501A
CB 1501B
CBMH 1502
CBMH 1503
CB 1503A
CB 1503B
STMH 1801
FES 1200
FES 1202A
FES 1203A
FES 1300
FES 1301D
FES 1500
FES 1600
FES 1601
FES 1800
FES 1802
FES 5
FES 6
FES 7
FES 8
OCS 5
OCS 6
OCS 7
OCS 8
48"
48"
48"
48"
2'x3'
2'x3'
2'x3'
2'x3'
CBMH 1501
2'x3'
2'x3'
2'x3'
2'x3'
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
18" RCP APRON
15" RCP APRON
15" RCP APRON
21" RCP APRON
18" RCP APRON
21" RCP APRON
12" RCP APRON
12" RCP APRON
15" RCP APRON
12" RCP APRON
15" RCP APRON
12" RCP APRON
12" RCP APRON
12" RCP APRON
R-1642-B
R-1642-B
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-3067-VB
R-1642-B
R-3067-V
R-3067-V
R-3067-V
R-3067-V
GALVANIZED
GALVANIZED
GALVANIZED
GALVANIZED
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
STO-8 &9
STO-8 &9
STO-8 &9
STO-8 &9
STO-8 &9
STO-8 &9
STO-8 &9
STO-8 &9
STO-8 &9
STO-8
STO-8
STO-8
STO-8
STO-8
STO-1
STO-1
STO-1
STO-4
STO-4
STO-4
STO-6
STO-4
STO-4
STO-4
STO-4
STO-4
STO-4
STO-6
STO-6
STO-6
STO-6
STO-6
STO-6
STO-6
STO-5
C7.6/1
C7.6/2
C7.6/3
C7.6/4
OCS 10 48"GALVANIZED C7.6/5
UTILITY SCHEMATIC (SOUTH)1
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
INV=988.16
INV CMP 15
INV=987.80
CMP 12IN INV
INV=988.08
CMP 12IN INV
>>
OE
OE
WE
T
L
A
N
D
2
33 33
3333
WETLAND 1e
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1f
ST-22
EL=985.8
L.P.H.P.
L.P.
H.P.
CL CL
L.
P
.
L.
P
.
GF = 994.5
EX.CL
993.17
%
1.
0
%1.0 %1.9 %1.0
%0.5 %0.55
%
1.
7
4
89
.
5
4
CL CL
%
1.
0
L.P
.
92
.
4
0
%
2.
0
87
.
5
E
O
F
%0.5
88.1
88
.
1
88.1
88.1
8
8
.
1
VM
A
GF
=
9
9
2
.
8
99
0
.
1
SE
W
O
98
9
.
6
988.
5 GF=9
9
6
.
8
989.
3
FBW
O
988.
8
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
98
7
.
0
FB
W
O
98
6
.
5
986
990
988
988
988
99
2
98
6
982 982
986
98
6
986
988
990
990
990
990
990
990
979
980
982
984986
992
990
987
988
99
0
9
8
5
98
4
982 980 978 978
986
985
984
982
980
978
92
.
3
9
986 988
988
986
98
6
98
8
98
8
9
8
6
98
8
9
8
8
9
8
6
984
988
986 984
988
988
EOF
990
990
26
25 24
23
0+
0
0
1+
0
0
2+
0
0
5
BLK 1
CHIPPEWA ROAD
15
+
0
0
15
+
5
0
.
4
8
7+
0
0
7+
5
2
.
2
5
POND
(9P)
BTM = 976.00
NWL = 985.00
HWL = 987.11
WETLAND 1f
HWL =
985.16
POND 3
HWL =
991.07
WETLAND 2
HWL = 986.27
FOREBAY
(13P)
BTM = 979.00
NWL = 986.00
35'
50'
25'
35
'
38
39
40
33
'
38'
2
0
'
OU
T
L
O
T
F
OUTLOT B
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
980.6
98
0
.
6
980.6
1459
14601461
14621463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
14781479
1480
1481
1482
1483 1484 1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
14901491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496 1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
15041505
L.P.
%0.55
%
3.
0
VMA
988
982
982
982
984
986
982
986
1000
982
98
6
.
2
98
6
.
2
86
.
0
EOF
98
4
98
8
988 98
8
980
982
984
985
86.1
EOF
988
985
984
990
990
992
994
996
998
1002
986
.
6
986
.
6
9
8
6
.
6
986.6
98
8
.
2
9
8
8
.
5
98
6
97
8
98
1
9
8
2
9
8
4
9
8
4
9
8
0
98
2
98
4
982
984
984
986
988
986988
988
VM
A
POND
(12P)
BTM = 979.00
NWL = 984.50
HWL=987.39
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
INV=1003.07
INV 12IN HDPE CPP
INV=1001.95
INV 12IN HDPE CPP
PK FD
MB
INV=1004.06
INV CMP 15 IN
IPFD 17255IPFD 43414
11641165
11661167
1168
1169 1170
11711172
1189
11901191
1192
1193
1194
1195
140514061407
1408 1409
14101411
1412
14131414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1427
1428
1441
1442
1443
1444
1456
1457
1458
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
14731474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1487
1488
1489
14901491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496 1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504150515061507
1508
1509
1510 1511
1512
CL CL
97.1
%
3.
0
G
.
B
.
%
2
.
5
H.
P
.
1000.0
994.0+/-%
2.0
%
5.0
998.0+/-VMA
992
99
8
992
998
1
0
0
4
988
9
9
8
992
98
4
9
8
4
1000
1
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
4
992
98
6
.
2
98
6
.
2
9
8
6
.
2
98
6
.
2
98
6
.
2
86
.
0
EOF
98
4
98
8
984
988
988
988 98
8
980
982
984
985
99
0
991
992
988
985
984
990
990
990
992
994
996
996
998
1002
9
9
4
9
9
6
996
994
994
1
0
0
0
99
2
99
6
10
0
0
9
9
4
9
9
8
1
0
0
2
986
.
6
986.6
98
8
.
2
9
8
8
.
5
98
6
9
8
4
9
8
2
9
8
1
9
8
0
97
8
98
1
9
8
2
9
8
4
9
8
4
98
0
98
2
98
4
9
8
4
982
984
VM
A
1
0
0
4
POND
(11P)
BTM = 977.00
NWL = 982.00
HWL = 984.20
POND
(12P)
BTM = 979.00
NWL = 984.50
HWL=987.39
NORTH
0 50 100
CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL
REV.PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 09.14.21
CNC
RCH
2021-08-16
2021-10-08
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA NORTH
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
10.07.2021
MEH17003
20
2
1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C301MEH003.dwg
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
C3.1
GENERAL NOTES
FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070.
SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELM CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION (ECWMC).
DENOTES BORROW AREA. AFTER MATERIAL IS REMOVED CONTRACTOR TO BRING BOTTOM OF
POND TO 873.0 WITH GRADING SPOIL.
1.
2.
GRADING NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR GRADING NOTES
EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES.
3
1.TOP NUT HYDRANT, 725 FEET ± FROM THE CENTERLINES INTERSECTION OF
THE WESTBOUND LANE OF TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 55 AND MOHAWK DRIVE.
WEST SIDE OF MOWHAWK DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 998.180
2.TOP NUT HYDRANT, NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF
CHIPPAWA ROAD AND HACKAMORE DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 1007.372
BENCHMARK
:Inlet Protection
nn
:Silt Fence
:Vehicle Tracking Pad
47 Each
3 Each
21740 Feet
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
:Compost or Bio Log 855 Feet)))))))))))))
:Erosion Control Blanket 12000 S.Y.
LEGEND
ESTIMATED QUANTITYSYMBOLDESCRIPTION
910
908
:MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:Heavy Duty Silt Fence 17689 Feet
:Pavement Sawcut
:Construction Limits
:Wetland Impact Area
:Flood Plain Impact Area
:Flood Plain Mitigation Area
13+00
14+00
15+00
16+00
17+00
18+00
19+00 20+00
21+00
22+
0
0
23
+
0
0
2
4
+
0
0
2
5
+
0
0
2
6
+
0
0
1006.3
SSMH
RE=1005.5
IE=974.93
INV=1003.07
INV 12IN HDPE CPP
INV=1001.95
INV 12IN HDPE CPP
SSMH
RE=996.8
IE=975.43
>
>
980.6
98
0
.
6
980.6
1006.5
1006.6MB
1006.4
1006.2
1006.4
>
>
>
10
"
P
V
C
8"
P
V
C
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8" PVC 8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
1
2
"
W
A
T
.
>>
8"
W
A
T
.
8" W
A
T
.
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
12" W
A
T
.
12"
W
A
T
.
12" WAT.
1
2
"
W
A
T
.
>>
>>
>>
1 2
BLK 2
CONNECT TO 12" PVC
C900 WATERMAIN
STUB
CONNECT TO 8" PVC
C900 WATERMAIN
STUB
MAINTAIN 7.5' MIN.
COVER OVER
WATERMAIN
MAINTAIN 7.5' MIN.
COVER OVER
WATERMAIN
12"x12"
TEE
45° BEND
45° BEND
45° BEND
8" GATE VALVE
8"X12" REDUCER
CONNECT TO EXISTING 8"
WATERMAIN WITH 8"X8" TEE
CHIPP
E
W
A
ROA
D
SEE SOUTH CD SET
FOR WATERMAIN
CONTINUATION
SEE NORTH CD SET
FOR WATERMAIN
CONTINUATION
22.5° BEND 22.5° BEND
22.5° BEND
45° BEND
45° BEND
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT J
OUTLOT J
965
970
975
980
985
990
995
1000
965
970
975
980
985
990
995
1000
MAINT. 7.5' MIN.
COVER OVER
WATERMAIN
12"x12"
TEE
12" PLUG
( SEE NORTH CD'S)
12
"
P
l
u
g
S
t
a
:
1
3
+
1
0
C
h
i
p
p
a
w
a
R
d
.
12
"
x
1
2
"
T
E
E
S
t
a
:
1
3
+
6
9
C
h
i
p
p
a
w
a
R
d
.
98
2
.
0
98
2
.
0
98
2
.
0
98
2
.
0
98
2
.
0
0
98
0
.
6
98
7
.
4
0
98
1
.
1
98
9
.
7
7
98
1
.
3
98
9
.
8
6
98
0
.
9
99
0
.
0
1
98
0
.
4
98
9
.
7
2
-0+25 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 2+75
45
°
B
e
n
d
S
t
a
:
1
3
+
7
4
C
h
i
p
p
a
w
a
R
d
.
45
°
B
e
n
d
S
t
a
:
1
4
+
5
9
C
h
i
p
p
a
w
a
R
d
.
MAINT. 7.5' MIN.
COVER OVER
WATERMAIN
EXISTING GROUND
FINISHED GROUND
12" PVC C900 WATERMAIN
12" PVC C
9
0
0
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
SEE RIGHT FOR
WATERMAIN
CONTINUATION
12
"
B
.
F
.
V
.
S
t
a
:
1
3
+
6
3
C
h
i
p
p
a
w
a
R
d
.
965
970
975
980
985
990
995
965
970
975
980
985
990
995
98
2
.
0
98
9
.
9
9
98
2
.
0
98
9
.
8
5
98
1
.
7
98
9
.
7
1
98
1
.
9
98
9
.
5
8
98
2
.
0
98
9
.
4
4
98
2
.
0
98
9
.
3
0
98
2
.
0
98
9
.
1
6
98
2
.
0
98
9
.
0
3
98
2
.
0
98
8
.
8
9
98
1
.
9
98
8
.
7
5
98
1
.
5
98
8
.
6
1
98
1
.
5
98
8
.
4
8
98
1
.
7
98
8
.
3
4
98
2
.
0
98
8
.
2
0
98
2
.
0
98
8
.
0
6
98
2
.
0
98
7
.
9
3
98
2
.
0
98
7
.
7
9
98
2
.
0
98
7
.
6
5
98
2
.
0
98
7
.
5
1
98
2
.
0
98
7
.
3
8
98
1
.
9
98
7
.
2
4
98
1
.
9
98
7
.
1
0
98
1
.
8
98
6
.
9
6
98
1
.
9
98
6
.
8
3
98
1
.
9
98
6
.
7
3
98
1
.
9
98
6
.
7
3
98
2
.
0
98
6
.
8
1
98
2
.
0
98
6
.
9
9
98
2
.
0
98
7
.
2
5
98
2
.
0
98
7
.
6
0
98
4
.
8
98
8
.
0
4
98
6
.
7
98
8
.
5
7
98
7
.
2
98
9
.
1
8
98
7
.
7
98
9
.
8
9
98
8
.
1
99
0
.
6
4
98
9
.
4
99
1
.
3
9
99
1
.
1
99
2
.
1
3
99
3
.
1
99
2
.
8
6
99
5
.
9
99
3
.
5
7
14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00
45
°
B
e
n
d
S
t
a
:
1
4
+
5
9
C
h
i
p
p
a
w
a
R
d
.
FINISHED GROUND
EXISTING GROUND
12" PVC C900 WATERMAIN
12" PVC C9
0
0
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
MAINT. 7.5' MIN.
COVER OVER
WATERMAIN
22
.
5
°
B
e
n
d
S
t
a
:
2
0
+
7
1
C
h
i
p
p
a
w
a
R
d
.
22
.
5
°
B
e
n
d
S
t
a
:
1
8
+
6
1
C
h
i
p
p
a
w
a
R
d
.
22
.
5
°
B
e
n
d
S
t
a
:
2
2
+
6
8
C
h
i
p
p
a
w
a
R
d
.
45
°
B
e
n
d
S
t
a
:
2
3
.
6
1
C
h
i
p
p
a
w
a
R
d
.
MAINT. 7.5' MIN.
COVER OVER
WATERMAIN
45° VERT.
BENDS
45° VERT.
BENDS
LOWER WM.
MIN. 18" TO
AVOID ST.
SEWER
CONFLICT
STORM
X-ING
STORM
X-ING
STORM
X-ING
STORM
X-ING
SEE LEFT FOR
WATERMAIN
CONTINUATION
SEE SHEET C4.2 FOR
WATERMAIN CONTINUATION
CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL
ALIGNMENT LABELS ADDED TO C6 SHEETS
REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 09.14.21
RCH
RCH
RCH
2021-08-16
2021-09-14
2021-10-08
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
CHIPPEWA ROAD
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
08.16.2021
MEH17003
20
2
1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
NORTH
0 50 100
C401MEH003.dwg
WATERMAIN
C4.1
GENERAL NOTES
For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.
See sheet C4.0 for utility notes, service schedule, and storm sewer schedule.
See sheets C7.1 thru C7.5 fpr project details.
1.
2.
3.
BENCHMARK
1.TOP NUT HYDRANT, 725 FEET ± FROM THE CENTERLINES INTERSECTION OF THE WESTBOUND LANE OF
TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 55 AND MOHAWK DRIVE. WEST SIDE OF MOWHAWK DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 998.180
2.TOP NUT HYDRANT, NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF CHIPPAWA ROAD AND HACKAMORE
DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 1007.372
WATERMAIN TO EAST CONNECTION ON ARROWHEAD DRIVE
SEE SHEET C4.2
23
+
0
0
2
4
+
0
0
2
5
+
0
0
2
6
+
0
0
1006.3
SSMH
RE=1005.5
IE=974.93
INV=1003.07
INV 12IN HDPE CPP
INV=1001.95
INV 12IN HDPE CPP
SSMH
RE=996.8
IE=975.43
>
>
1006.5
1006.6MB
1006.4
1006.2
1006.4
>
>
>
10
"
P
V
C
8"
P
V
C
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8" PVC 8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
12"
W
A
T
.
1
2
"
W
A
T
.
>>
>>
45° BEND
8" GATE VALVE
8"X12" REDUCER
CONNECT TO EXISTING 8"
WATERMAIN WITH 8"X8" TEE22.5° BEND
45° BEND
45° BEND
R
O
A
D
CHIPPEWA
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT J
REPLACE EXISTING CROSS
WITH 8" TEE TO MAINTAIN
WATER CONNECTION TO
THE EAST.
970
975
980
985
990
995
1000
1005
970
975
980
985
990
995
1000
1005
99
2
.
8
99
2
.
7
5
99
2
.
1
99
2
.
1
8
99
0
.
9
99
2
.
2
5
99
0
.
0
99
2
.
4
1
99
0
.
0
99
2
.
6
4
99
0
.
1
99
4
.
3
0
99
0
.
4
99
5
.
5
5
99
3
.
4
99
5
.
8
8
99
7
.
2
99
7
.
3
2
99
7
.
8
99
7
.
5
8
-0+75 -0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 2+75
SAN. SEWER
X-ING
12" PVC C90
0
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
45
°
B
e
n
d
S
t
a
:
2
3
.
6
1
C
h
i
p
p
a
w
a
R
d
.
MAINT. 7.5' MIN.
COVER OVER
WATERMAIN
CL
C
L
C
h
i
p
p
a
w
a
R
d
.
&
H
a
c
k
m
o
r
e
D
r
.
45
°
B
e
n
d
S
t
a
:
0
+
0
9
H
a
c
k
m
o
r
e
R
d
.
45
°
B
e
n
d
S
t
a
:
1
+
5
5
H
a
c
k
m
o
r
e
R
d
.
12
"
x
8
"
R
e
d
u
c
e
r
S
t
a
:
2
+
1
6
H
a
c
k
m
o
r
e
R
d
.
8"
G
a
t
e
V
a
l
v
e
S
t
a
:
2
+
2
8
H
a
c
k
m
o
r
e
R
d
.
8"
T
e
e
S
t
a
:
2
+
3
4
H
a
c
k
m
o
r
e
R
d
.
EXISTING GROUND
FINISHED GROUND
SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR
WATERMAIN
CONTINUATION
965
970
975
980
985
990
995
1000
1005
965
970
975
980
985
990
995
1000
1005
10
0
6
.
7
10
0
4
.
0
0
10
0
6
.
1
10
0
4
.
1
4
10
0
5
.
5
10
0
4
.
3
10
0
3
.
0
10
0
1
.
7
10
0
0
.
3
99
8
.
9
99
8
.
0
1
99
7
.
5
99
7
.
5
0
99
6
.
2
99
6
.
5
4
99
5
.
0
99
6
.
1
5
99
4
.
1
99
6
.
1
2
99
3
.
3
99
6
.
0
4
99
2
.
6
99
5
.
2
9
99
2
.
0
99
4
.
0
5
99
1
.
7
99
2
.
8
2
99
1
.
5
99
1
.
4
-0+75 -0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+25
EXISTI
N
G
8
"
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
EXISTING 10" PVC SAN. SEWER
FINISHED GROUND
EXISTING GROUND
CONNECT TO EXISTING
8" PVC WATERMAIN
WITH 8"X8" TEE
24+0
0
25+00
26+00
1
0
0
6
.
3
SSMH
RE=1005.5
IE=974.93
INV=1003.07
INV 12IN HDPE CPP
INV=1001.95
INV 12IN HDPE CPP
SSMH
RE=996.8
IE=975.43
>
>
1
0
0
6
.
5
1
0
0
6
.
6
MB
1
0
0
6
.
4
1
0
0
6
.
2
1
0
0
6
.
4
>
>
>
10" P
V
C
8" PV
C
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8"
P
V
C
I
8"
P
V
C
8"
P
V
C
8"
P
V
C
8"
P
V
C
12"
W
A
T
.
>
>
CHIP
P
E
W
A
ROAD
O
U
T
L
O
T
J
OUTLO
T
A
FIELD VERIFY EXISTING
WATERMAIN DEPTH AT THIS
LOCATION DURING
GRADING. IF WATREMAIN
HAS LESS THAN 7.5 FT. OF
BURY, LOWER WATERMAIN
AS NEEDED.
CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL
ALIGNMENT LABELS ADDED TO C6 SHEETS
REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 09.14.21
RCH
RCH
RCH
2021-08-16
2021-09-14
2021-10-08
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
CHIPPEWA ROAD
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
08.16.2021
MEH17003
20
2
1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C402MEH003.dwg
WATERMAIN
C4.2
GENERAL NOTES
For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.
See sheet C4.0 for utility notes, service schedule, and storm sewer schedule.
See sheets C7.1 thru C7.5 fpr project details.
1.
2.
3.
BENCHMARK
1.TOP NUT HYDRANT, 725 FEET ± FROM THE CENTERLINES INTERSECTION OF THE
WESTBOUND LANE OF TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 55 AND MOHAWK DRIVE. WEST SIDE OF
MOWHAWK DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 998.180
2.TOP NUT HYDRANT, NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF CHIPPAWA ROAD
AND HACKAMORE DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 1007.372
WATERMAIN CHIPPAWA RD. TO
CONNECTION ON ARROWHEAD DR.
SE
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
4
.
1
NORTH
0 50NORTH
0 50
EXISTING WATERMAIN ARROWHEAD DR.
SEE SHEET C4.1
19+00 20+00
21+00
22+
0
0
23
+
0
0
2
4
+
0
0
1483 1484 1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
14901491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496 1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504150515061507
1508
1509
1510 1511
1512
>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
12"
W
A
T
.
12" WAT.
1
2
"
W
A
T
.
>>
>>
>>
FES 702
FES 703
FES 705
FES 704
FES 701
FES 700
OCS 9
FES 9
FES 1402
FES 1401
FES 1700
CB 1701
CHIPPEWA
ROA
D
BTM = 977.00
NWL = 982.00
HWL = 984.20
POND
(11P)
BTM = 979.00
NWL = 984.50
HWL=987.39
POND
(12P)
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT J
980
985
990
995
1000
980
985
990
995
1000
99
1
.
6
98
4
.
6
0
99
2
.
1
98
9
.
6
7
99
3
.
0
99
2
.
4
6
99
3
.
9
99
2
.
8
7
99
5
.
0
99
2
.
5
5
99
6
.
0
99
0
.
9
9
-0+25 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+25
EXISTING GROUND
FINISHED GROUND
159' - 15"
R
C
P
C
L
.
V
@
2
.
5
2
%
FES 1700
INV= 984.50
15" RCP APRON
CITY DETAIL: STO-8
RIP-RAP PER DETAIL: STO-9
CB 1701
INV=988.50
15" RCP APRON
CITY DETAIL: STO-8
975
980
985
990
975
980
985
990
98
2
.
2
-0+25 0+00 0+50 0+75
OCS 9
RIM (LOW): 984.50
INV: 982.00
INV: 980.00
BOTTOM: 979.00
45' - 15" RCP CL. V
@ 0.90%
FES 9
INV= 981.60
15" RCP APRON
CITY DETAIL: STO-8
RIP-RAP PER DETAIL: STO-9
FINISHED GROUNDEXISTING GROUND
975
980
985
990
975
980
985
990
98
6
.
2
98
2
.
0
0
98
5
.
7
98
8
.
2
5
98
7
.
0
98
8
.
0
2
98
8
.
4
98
6
.
0
8
-0+250+000+501+001+501+75
121' - 15"
R
C
P
C
L
.
V
@
2
.
0
7
%
FES 1402
IVV=984.50
15" RCP APRON
CITY DETAIL: STO-8
FES 1401
INV= 982.00
15" RCP APRON
CITY DETAIL: STO-8
RIP-RAP PER DETAIL: STO-9
FINISHED GROUND
EXISTING GROUND
WATER
X-ING
975
980
985
990
975
980
985
990
98
2
.
0
97
9
.
0
0
98
1
.
9
98
6
.
9
5
98
1
.
8
98
4
.
9
5
-0+250+000+501+001+25
89' - 36" RCP CL. V
@ 1.12%
FES 701
INV=980.00
36" RCP APRON
CITY DETAIL: STO-8
FES 700
INV= 979.00
36" RCP APRON
CITY DETAIL: STO-8
RIP-RAP PER DETAIL: STO-9
FINISHED GROUND
EXISTING GROUND
975
980
985
990
975
980
985
990
98
1
.
9
97
9
.
0
0
98
1
.
8
98
6
.
8
8
98
1
.
8
98
4
.
7
7
-0+250+000+501+001+25
FINISHED GROUND
EXISTING GROUND
89' - 36" RCP CL. V
@ 1.13%
FES 703
INV=980.00
36" RCP APRON
CITY DETAIL: STO-8
FES 702
INV= 979.00
36" RCP APRON
CITY DETAIL: STO-8
RIP-RAP PER DETAIL: STO-9
975
980
985
990
975
980
985
990
98
1
.
9
97
9
.
0
0
98
1
.
9
98
6
.
8
4
98
1
.
7
98
3
.
8
0
-0+250+000+501+001+25
89' - 36" RCP CL. V
@ 1.12%
FES 705
INV=980.00
36" RCP APRON
CITY DETAIL: STO-8
RIP-RAP PER DETAIL: STO-9
FES 704
INV= 979.00
36" RCP APRON
CITY DETAIL: STO-8
RIP-RAP PER DETAIL: STO-9
FINISHED GROUND
EXISTING GROUND
CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL
ALIGNMENT LABELS ADDED TO C6 SHEETS
REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 09.14.21
RCH
RCH
RCH
2021-08-16
2021-09-14
2021-10-08
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
CHIPPEWA ROAD
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
08.16.2021
MEH17003
20
2
1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
NORTH
0 50 100
C501MEH003.dwg
STORM SEWER
C5.1
GENERAL NOTES
For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.
See sheet C4.0 for utility notes, service schedule, and storm sewer schedule.
See sheets C7.1 thru C7.5 fpr project details.
1.
2.
3.
BENCHMARK
1.TOP NUT HYDRANT, 725 FEET ± FROM THE CENTERLINES INTERSECTION OF THE WESTBOUND LANE OF TRUNK
HIGHWAY NO. 55 AND MOHAWK DRIVE. WEST SIDE OF MOWHAWK DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 998.180
2.TOP NUT HYDRANT, NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF CHIPPAWA ROAD AND HACKAMORE DRIVE.
ELEVATION = 1007.372
FES 701 - FES 700
FES 1402 - FES 1401
FES 9 - OCS 9
SEE C7.7/1
FES 1701 - FES 1700
FES 703 - FES 702 FES 705 - FES 704
EM
EM
GAS
>>
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE OE OE OE
>>
>>
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
>>
OTV
OT
V
>>
>>
>>
182
185
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>
EX. 6" DIP
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
980.6
980.
6
980.
6
980.
6
980.
6
980.
6
980
.
6
98
0
.
6
980.6
408409
435437442
454455
456
463
486487
498499
500 501502503
504
505
506
515516517
518 525
531
536
537 538539
544 545
552
576
592593
MB
1
2
3
4
5
6
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
222324
2526
27
28
2930
31
32
33
3738
394041
42
43
44454647
48
495051
52
53
54
55
56
5758
59606162
63
64
71
7374
87
88
8990
91 92
93
94
9596
9798
99
100
130
131132
133
134
135136
137 138
139
140 141
142
143144
145
146
147148149
150
151152153154155156157
163164165
166 167
168169
170171
172173
183184
186187188
189 190191192193194195 196197 198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
216
217218219
220 221222223 224
225 226
227
228 229230 231
233234235
236
237238239240
241
242
243
244
245246247
248249
250251
252253254255256257
258
259
260
261262
263
264
265
266267
268
269
270
271
272
273274275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282283
284
285
286
287 288
289
290
291
292
293
294295 296297
298
299
300
301302
303
304
305
306
307308
309310
311
312313
314
315
316317
318
319
320321322323
324 325
326
327328329330331332333
334
335336
337338339
340
341342
343
344345
346 347
348349350
351
352353 354
355356
357358
359 360361362
363364365
366367368369
370
371372373374
375
376
377
378379
380381382
383384
385
386
387388
389
390
401 402
403404
405
406
407
410
411412413
414415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423424
425
426
427428429430
431
432
433434
436438439440441
443444
445446447
448
449
450451
452453
457458
459460
461
462
464465
466
467 468
469470
471
472473
474475476
477
478 479
480
481482
483
484485
488489490491492493494495
496497
507508
509510511
512513514
519520521
522
523 524
526 527
528
529
530
532533
534535
540
541
542
543
546
547
548
549
550
551 553
554555 556557
558
559
560561
562
563
564
565566567568569
570 571
572573574
575
577
578
579
580581582583584585586
587588589
590
591
594 595596
597
598599 600
601
602
603604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616617
618
619620
621
622623624625626
627
628
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811812813814
815
816817
818819
820821
822823824
825826827
828
829
830
831832833
834
835836837838
839
840
841
842
843844845846847
848849850851
852853
854
858
859860
861862863864
871
872
873
874 875
876877878
879
880881882883
884
885
886
887888889
890891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899900
901
902
903 904
905
906907908
909
910911912
913
914915
916
917918
919
920921
922
923
924
925926927928
929
930931
932
933934
935
936937938
939
940941942943
944
945946
947948949 950
951
952953
954955
956
960961
962963
981
1003
1004100510061007
10081009
1010 101110121013
1014
10151016
10171018
1019102010211022
1023
1024
1025
1040
1041
1042
1049
1050
1061
1063
1064
1065
1066
1090
1099
11001101
1102 1103
1104
1105110611071108
11091110
1111 1114
1115111611171118
11221123
1124
1127
1128
1129113011311132
1133
1134
1135
113611371138113911401141
114211431144114511461147
11481149
1150
1151
11521153
115711581159
12031204
1385
ST-1EL=990.6
ST-2EL=990.4
ST-3EL=987.4
ST-4EL=983.8
ST-5EL=982.2
ST-8EL=986.2
ST-9EL=981.2
ST-10
EL=981.7
ST-11
EL=997.4
ST-12
EL=990.2
ST-13
EL=991.7
ST-14
EL=988.3
ST-15
EL=989.0
ST-16
EL=990.5
ST-6EL=984.8
ST-7EL=983.7
ST-17EL=982.1
ST-18EL=982.9
ST-19EL=983.8
ST-20EL=982.6
ST-21EL=982.6
ST-22
EL=985.8
1535
15361537
153815391540
1541
15421543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
154915501551
155215531554155515561557155815591560156115621563
156415651566
1567
1568
1611
1612
1613
16141615
16881689
1690
1691 1692
1693
16941695
1696
169716981699
1700
1701
1702
1703 1704170517061707
170817091710
1711
1712
1713171417151716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722172317241725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
17311732
1733
17341735
1736
1737
1738
173917401741
1774
1775
1776
17771778
1779
1780
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
17861787
1788
1789
1790
1791
1792
179317941795 1796
1797
179817991800
18011802
180318041805
1806
1807180818091810
1811
18121813
1814
1815181618171818
181918201821
1822
182418251826182718281829
1830
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
187318741875
1876
187718781879
1880
1881
1882
18831884
1885
1886
1887
188818891890
18911892
1893
18941895 1896
18971898
1899
1900
1901
1902 1903
1904
1905
1906
1907190819091910
1911
19121913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
19211922
1923
19241925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931193219331934
1935
19361937193819391940
194119421943
1944
1945
1946194719481949
1950
1960
19611962
1963
1964
1965
19661967
1968
1969
19701971
1972 1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
19781979
1980
1981
198219831984 1985
1986
19871988
198919901991
199219931994
1995
199619971998
19992000
20012002
20032004200520062007
200820092010
2011201220132014
2015
20162017
2018
2019
202020212022
202320242025202620272028
202920302031
2032
20332034
20352036
20372038
2039
2040
2041
204220432044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
20522053
2054
205520562057
2058
2059
2060
206120622063 20642065
2066206720682069
2070
2071
2072
2073
20742075
2076
2077
20782079
2080
20812082
2083
2084
208520862087
2088
2089
20902091
4
3
2
1
50
49
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
41
36 35
34 33
32
31
30
29
28
27
26
25 24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
2
34
56
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
27
BLOCK 8
13
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
BLK 2
7
6
5
3
4
2
1
8
9
432
3
1
2 1
4
2
3
BLK 6
BLK
4
BLK 5
1
1
2
3
45
6
7
8 9
10
10
5
BLK 1
4
19 20 21 22 23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33 BLK 9
OUTLOT J
POND
(23P)
IRRIGATION POND
(1P)
POND
(9P)
POND
(5P)
FILTRATION
BASIN (16P)
POND
(18P)
IRRIGATION
POND
(20P)
POND
(14P)
OUTLOT C
WET 1h
WET 4
WETLAND 5b
W
E
T
5
a
WETLAND 1f
POND 3
WETLAND 1e
WETLAND 2
WETLAND 1d
WETLAND 1c
WETLAND 1a-North
WETLAND 1b1
WETLAND 1b
OUTLOT D
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
40'
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
POND (6P)
FOREBAY
(13P)
BLK
3BR
O
O
K
V
I
E
W
LA
N
E
37
38
39
40
POND
(11P)
POND
(12P)
WETLAND 1a-North
OUTLOT G
OU
T
L
O
T
F
OUTLOT J
OUTLOT J
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT E
OUTLOT H
OUTLOT H
51
BLOCK 7
OUTLOT I
51
BLOCK 7
51
BLOCK 7
51
BLOCK 7
27
BLOCK 8
51
BLOCK 7
OUTLOT I
STS
>>
STS
>>
S
T
S
>
>
S
T
S
>
>
S
T
S
>
>
ST
S
>>
S
T
S
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
S
T
S
>
>
STS >>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS
>>
STS>>STS>>STS>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS >>STS >>STS >>
S
T
S
>
>
S
T
S
>
>
S
T
S
>
>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS >>STS >>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS
>>
S
T
S
>
>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS>>STS>>STS>>STS>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS >>STS >>STS >>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS >>STS >>STS >>
EO
F
EO
F
E
O
F
EO
F
EOF
E
O
F
EO
F
E
O
F
87
.
5
E
O
F
%8.0
%
8.0
E
O
F
6:1Slope
in buffer
6:1
MAX
6:1Slope
in buffer
6
:
1
S
l
o
p
e
88.1
88
.
1
88.1
88.1
8
8
.
1
6:1
98
6
.
2
98
6
.
2
9
8
6
.
2
98
6
.
2
98
6
.
2
86
.
0
EOF
86.1
EOF
986
.
6
986
.
6
9
8
6
.
6
986.6
98
8
.
2
98
8
.
5
E
O
F
EO
F
EOF
EO
F
EO
F
EO
F
EO
F
EOF
EOF
EO
F
TW=998.0
BW=996.5
TW=998.0
BW=997.0
TW=992.0
BW=988.5
TW=992.0
BW=988.0
TW=990.5
BW=988.0
TW=985.5
BW=984.0
TW=985.5
BW=980.0
TW=985.5
BW=980.0
TW=985.5
BW=982.0
14
TYP.
L2.2 LANDSCAPE PLAN
NORTH
L2.3 LANDSCAPE PLAN
SOUTH
CHIPPE
W
A
R
O
A
D
MO
H
A
W
K
R
O
A
D
MO
H
A
W
K
R
O
A
D
RE
U
S
E
IR
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
LI
N
E
RE
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
TREES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME MATURE SIZE PLANTING SIZE ROOT COND.
236 Overstory Tree 60`H x 30`W 2"Cal B & B
67 Privacy and Boulevard Tree 60`H x 40`W 2"Cal B & B
EVERGREEN TREES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME MATURE SIZE PLANTING SIZE ROOT COND.
58 Abies balsamea / Balsam Fir 60`H x 30`W 6` Ht.B & B
12 Larix laricina / Tamarack 70`H x 50`W 6` Ht.B & B
55 Picea glauca / White Spruce 50`H x 20`W 6` Ht.B & B
32 Pinus strobus / Eastern White Pine 70` H x 40` W 6` Ht.B & B
25 Thuja occidentalis / American Arborvitae 40`H x 15`W 6` Ht.B & B
REUSE IRRIGATION LINE
NORTH
0 150 300
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER WATERSHED COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
16 FEB 2021
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
02.16.2021
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
L201MEH003.dwg
LANDSCAPE PLAN
OVERALL
L2.1
Contact Utility Service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning.
Coordinate installation with Contractors performing related work.
Seed mixture (BWSR Mesic Short Urban South and West) as defined by the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources. Native Seeds shall be of Minnesota
origin and certified by the Minnesota Crop Improvement Association (MCIA). Provide verifying documentation to the Owner 30 days minimum prior to
installation.
Plant material shall conform to the American Association of Nurserymen Standards and be of hardy stock, free from disease, infestation, damage, and
disfiguration. For discrepancy between the number of plants on the Schedule and the number shown on the Drawing, the Drawing shall govern.
All existing deciduous/coniferous trees are to be trimmed of dead wood and pruned to a natural uniform shape.
Planting soil shall consist of 4 parts topsoil to 1 part peat humus, with 3 pounds of commercial fertilizer added per cubic yard.
Spread a minimum of 4 inches of topsoil and seed/sod all turf areas disturbed by Construction.
Protective fencing should be installed around all planted trees. See L7.1 sheet for Detail.
See L7.1 Details for depth of planting soil.
Install a 4-foot diameter, 4-inch depth shredded hardwood mulch dish around trees not placed within a Shrub or Perennial Planting Bed. Vinyl edging is not
required, unless noted otherwise.
In-ground irrigation systems may not connect to city water, they must connect to pond or well water.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
GENERAL NOTES
LANDSCAPE NOTES
This Landscape Plan has been developed to meet three landscaping requirements as defined by code: (A) Lot landscaping for R-1,
R-2, R-3 zoning, (B) Buffer Yards, and (C) Tree Replacement.
For construction Staking and Surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.
This page shows the overall plan, tree replacement areas, planting schedule, and allowed tree species. See Sheets L2.2 and L2.3 for
a detailed view of lot landscaping, buffer yard plantings, wetland buffer native vegetation restoration, and wetland buffer marker
signs.
1.
2.
3.
Front Yard Trees:
#Lots:
#Trees Required:
#Trees Provided:
LANDSCAPE - REQUIRED / PROVIDED
R1 and R2
Two overstory trees per lot
118
236
236
Buffer Yards
A buffer yard is required:
When a developing property is adjacent to or across a street from property of a less intensive zoning district.
Along arterial and collector roadways if the property on the opposite side of the roadway is the same or a more intensive zoning district. See City of Medina
Zoning Ordinance 828.31 for specific tables and calculations.
PLANTING SCHEDULE - LOTS AND BUFFER YARDS
ACCEPTABLE TREE SPECIES SELECTION
Deciduous Trees
Ash, Black (Fraxinus nigra)
Aspen, bigtooth (Populus grandidentata)
Aspen, quaking (Populus tremuloides)
Basswood, American (Tilia Americana)
Birch, paper (Betula papyrifera)
Birch, river (Betula nigra)
Birch, yellow (Betula alleghaniensis)
Cherry pin (Prunus pensylvanica)
Elm, American (Ulmus americana)*
Hickory, bitternut (Carya cordiformis)
Honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos)
Hornbeam, American (Carpinus caroliniana)
Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana)
Maple, Sugar (Acer saccharum)
Maple, Red (Acer rubrum)
*cultivars resistant to Dutch Elm Disease
Coniferous Trees
Cedar, Northern White (Thuja occidentalis)
Fir, Balsam (Abies balsamea)
Spruce, White (Picea glauca)
Pine, Eastern White (Pinus strobus)
Oak, Red (Quercus rubra)
Oak, White (Quercus alba)
Oak, Bur (Quercus macrocarpa)
Oak, Swamp White (Quercus bicolor)
Walnut, Black (Salix nigra)
LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS - TREE REPLACEMENT
14.
LEGEND
Irrigation
(A)
(B)
(C)
(C)
(Typ)
(B)
(Typ)
(A)
(Typ)
(B)
(Typ)
(A)
(Typ)
14.
(Typ)
14.
(Typ)
14.
(Typ)
14.
(Typ)
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the
laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Joshua K. Popehn
License No:Date:
Floodplain Impact
Floodplain Mitigation
Floodplain Impact
and Mitigation
Total significant trees on site:
Allowed Tree Removal (15% of total):
Total Trees Lost ::
# Trees to Replace (lost trees minus allowed removal):
Replacement Requirements:
Total caliper inches to replace (sum of smallest 355 trees):
Tree Loss and Replacement Calculations
1,763
264
619
355
for every 1 caliper inch lost, 1 caliper inch must be planted.
3,372
R-1, R-2, and R-3 requirements - tree locations have been provided as a guide for lot builders who are responsible for required
landscaping at the time of home construction. A generic tree symbol is used in these instances. Tree species selection for these must
conform with the provided list. No species should comprise more than 25% of the total planting.
Buffer Yards - tree locations and species have been provided to conform with City calculations and requirements. Any modifications
to this plan must be approved by the City of Medina at the time of building permit.
Privacy and Boulevard Trees - tree species selection for these must conform with the provided list. No species should comprise more
than 25% of the total planting.
# Trees provided in
Buffer Yards:182
Privacy and Boulevard Trees
Not required by code.
# Trees provided:67
Total Trees:485
Total # of Trees Provided:485
(C)
(Typ)
(C)
(Typ)(C)
(Typ)
(C)
(Typ)
(A)
(B)
(C)
Revised 10.13.2021
(A)
(C)
(B)
Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 October 5, 2021
City Council Meeting
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: October 14, 2021
MEETING: October 19, 2021 City Council
Land Use Application Review
A) BAPS Site Plan Review – 1400 Hamel Road – Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam
Swaminarayan Sanstha (BAPS), Minneapolis, has requested Site Plan Review for
construction of a place of assembly. The Planning Commission reviewed at the September
14 meeting and recommended approval. The City Council reviewed on October 5 and
tabled for more information, which is scheduled to be presented on October 19.
B) Sign Ordinance Amendment – Ditter Heating and Cooling has requested that the City
consider amending its Sign Ordinance to increase the allowed height and size of
freestanding signs within the Commercial-General zoning district adjacent to a state
highway – The Planning Commission held public hearings at the September and October
meetings. Following discussion, the Commission recommended approval with a number of
changes. Staff intends to present to City Council on October 19.
C) Weston Woods Final Plat – east of Mohawk Drive, north of Highway 55 – Mark Smith
(Mark of Excellence Homes) has requested Final Plat for development of 76 twinhomes, 42
single-family, and 33 townhomes on the Roy and Cavanaugh properties. Staff intends to
present at the October 19 meeting.
D) Life-Style Auto Condo – South of Hwy 55, west of Pioneer – SH Ventures has requested
review of a PUD Concept Plan for development of 12 buildings with approximately 258,000
square feet of space for privately owned garage condos. The Planning Commission held a
public hearing and provided comments at the October 12 meeting. Most Commissioners
generally did not believe the proposal was consistent with the objectives of FDA land use of
the Comp Plan. Staff intends to present to Council on November 3.
E) Hamel Townhomes Concept Plan – Hamel Townhomes, LLC has requested review of a
concept plan for a 30 unit townhome development at 342 Hamel Road. Staff is conducting
preliminary review and will schedule for a public hearing if complete, potentially at the
November 9 Planning Commission.
F) Marsh Pointe Preserve Preliminary Plat – 4250-4292 Arrowhead Drive – BPS Properties
has requested Preliminary Plat approval for a 38-lot subdivision east of Arrowhead Drive
south of Bridgewater. The application is currently incomplete and will be scheduled for a
public hearing when complete, potentially at the November 9 Planning Commission.
G) Caribou Cabin CUP and Site Plan Review – 3692 Pinto Drive – Woodbury REI LLC has
requested a Site Plan Review and CUP for a small retail building including a drive-through
at the southeast corner of Highway 55 and Pinto Drive. Staff is conducting preliminary
review and will schedule a public hearing if complete, potentially at the November 9
Planning Commission meeting.
MEMORANDUM
Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 October 5, 2021
City Council Meeting
H) Ditter Heating and Cooling Site Plan Review – 820 Tower Drive – Ditter Heating and
Cooling has requested a Site Plan Review for an approximately 5,000 square foot addition
to its building. The application is incomplete for review and will be scheduled for a hearing
when complete.
I) Medina Townhomes – 1432 Baker Park Road (County Road 29) – Medina Townhome
Development LLC has requested a Planned Unit Development General Plan and Site Plan
Review for 23 rental townhomes on 2 acres north of Highway 12, east of Baker Park Road.
The City Council adopted approval documents on September 21. Staff is working with the
applicant to address the conditions of approval prior to construction.
J) Deer Hill Preserve 5th Addition – Deer Hill Road, east of Homestead Tr. – Property
Resources Development Corporation has requested final plat approval for eight of the lots
within the Deer Hill Preserve development. City Council approved the final plat at the
August 17 meeting. Staff will work with the applicant to finalize conditions of approval
before executing the plat.
K) Cates Ranch Comp Plan Amendment and Rezoning – 2575 and 2590 Cates Ranch Drive –
Robert Atkinson has requested a change of the future land use from Future Development
Area to Business, a staging plan amendment to 2020, and a rezoning to Business Park. The
application is incomplete for review, and the City has requested additional materials.
L) Prairie Creek, Adam’s Pest Control Site Plan Review, Pre Plat, Rezoning – Pioneer Trail
Preserve – These projects have been preliminarily approved and the City is awaiting final
plat application.
M) Johnson ADU CUP, Hamel Brewery, St. Peter and Paul Cemetery – The City Council has
adopted resolutions approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants with the
conditions of approval in order to complete the projects.
N) Hamel Haven subdivision – These subdivisions have received final approval. Staff is
working with the applicants on the conditions of approval before the plat is recorded.
Other Projects
A) Swimming Pool Ordinance-setbacks to utilities – staff has been reviewing current
regulations which require a setback of 18 feet from pools to any underground utilities,
which a property owner has raised as prohibiting construction of a pool on their property.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on an ordinance reducing the setback for
underground utility at the October 12 meeting. Staff intends to present to Council at the
October 19 meeting.
B) Assessment Policy data – staff prepared data on existing public dead-end roadways to assist
with discussion on the City’s assessment policy.
C) Hackamore Road – staff met with Corcoran staff to discuss coordination of work being
proposed on County Road 47 by the City of Plymouth.
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jason Nelson, Director of Public Safety
DATE: October 14, 2021
RE: Department Updates
These past two weeks have been somewhat quiet. I hate to use the word quiet because it can change in
a moments notice.
Last week I attended the monthly Hennepin County Chiefs meeting in Crystal. The guest speaker was
Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman. Mr. Freeman had announced in September 2021 that he
was not running for re-election. Mr. Freeman has been the Hennepin County Attorney for 24 years.
Mr. Freeman went over a summary of new reforms that his office is doing in the areas of Marijuana
Possession, Expungements, and Bail. He also discussed his recent decision to no longer charge
criminals who spit on officer’s uniforms and boots in which he held a press conference on without
speaking with us. The policy was that his office would only charge if officers were spit on their hands
and face. Obviously, this upset the law enforcement community and after receiving several phone calls
from different Hennepin Chiefs he has decided to rescind his policy on that and will charge this crime
on a case-by-case basis. Also discussed was his reluctance to charge some cases that were discovered
during minor traffic offenses. The Ramsey County Attorney’s Office has already made it public that
they will no longer charge cases stemming from petty traffic stops. Mr. Freeman indicated that he is
not willing to go that far at this time but wanted to remind us of all that we should think about
prioritizing what traffic infractions we are enforcing.
This past week the Minnesota Peace Officer Standards and Training Board conducted an onsite
inspection of our training, personnel, and complaint files. This is a five-year audit to ensure that we
are complying with all the rules and regulations set forth by the Legislature. I was advised that we
passed with no issues noted. I was advised that there has been a push by Legislature to conduct these
reviews more often and if funding comes available in the future, they may do compliance every two or
three years.
Investigator McKinley is working on a large criminal sexual conduct case involving minor victims.
This case is very large in scope, and he is working with many different agencies. For the past month
or two he has almost been working on this case full time. The case is nearing conclusion and will be
submitted to the Hennepin County Attorneys Office for review and charging. Parts of the case will
become Federal, and he is also working with the FBI along with different jurisdictions.
Update on the squad and body cameras project. We now have an install date for the week of
December 12-15. This is exciting as we are nearing the finish line on this important project. Having
new squad and body cameras is something that we all can’t wait to have. It not only provides
transparency for the public but also provides some safeguards against false accusations that officers
have to endure from time to time. I can’t thank the City Council enough for funding this equipment.
Patrol:
The following are updates of Patrol Officers between September 29, 2021 and October 13, 2021:
Officers issued 25 citations and 28 warnings for various traffic offenses, responded to 5 property
damage accidents, 1 personal injury accident, 13 medicals, 3 suspicious calls, 5 traffic complaints, 19
assists to other agencies, 11 business/residential alarms.
On 09/30/2021 Officer was dispatched to a reported vehicle fire in the area of Highway 55 and County
Road 19. Upon arrival at the scene the Officer found the vehicle was having mechanical issues but
there was no fire. The Officer assisted with a tow for the vehicle.
On 10/02/2021 Officer assisted West Hennepin Public Safety on a barn fire in the 4400 block of
County Road 92 in Independence. Upon arrival Officers found a large barn fully engulfed in flames.
Officer assisted with road closure while the Fire Department worked on putting out the large fire.
On 10/02/2021 Officer responded to a reported illegal dumping in progress at Holy Name Church. It
was reported a Jeep was backed up to the dumpster throwing items into the dumpster without
permission. Upon arrival the Officer found the Jeep still parked in front of the dumpster with no one
around. The Officer called back the reporting party and learned that the person in fact was doing work
for the Church and did have permission to throw things in the dumpster.
On 10/04/2021 Officer took a walk-in report at our office. A resident from the 2800 block of
Lakeshore Avenue wanted to report a suspicious substance found in her sink in the morning. The
resident reported she believed someone had planted drugs in her house to “set her up”. The Officer
was unable to determine what the substance was, but it was not believed to be drugs.
On 10/06/2021 Officer assisted West Hennepin Public Safety on a recovered stolen motor vehicle in
the area of Townline Road and Watertown Road. Upon arrival the stolen vehicle was found
unoccupied. Officers checked the area, but suspect/s were not located.
On 10/06/2021 Officers were dispatched to a report of a person unconscious at Detour 19 bar in
Loretto. Upon arrival the person was conscious and Loretto Fire Department was tending to them.
Officers cleared once North Ambulance arrived on scene.
On 10/07/2021 Officer responded to two separate theft from auto reports in the area of St. Anne’s
Church and Complete Eye Care. Purses were stolen from two vehicles sometime during the day.
Credit cards from one of the purses was used at a Walmart in Elk River. Officer working on obtaining
surveillance video from the store to obtain suspect description.
On 10/09/2021 Officer stopped a vehicle on County Road 101 near Primrose Lane for going 86 mph in
the posted 50 mph zone. Driver said he was late for Church and was issued a citation for excessive
speed.
On 10/09/2021 officer stopped a motorcycle for going 89 mph in the posted 55 mph zone along
Highway 55. The driver said he was trying to pass another vehicle. The driver was advised he needs
to obey the speed limit and if he needs to go 89 mph to pass another vehicle he probably does not need
to pass that vehicle.
On 10/11/2021 Officer took a threat report from All Smiles Dental on Clydesdale Trail. A patient who
had surgery a few days prior had called demanding additional pain medication and became angry and
was yelling and cussing at the receptionist after he was told they would not provide any additional
medication. Officer made contact with the patient who said he never made any threats towards the
staff. He was advised he was not welcome back at the clinic. The patient advised he would find
another dentist.
On 10/12/2021 Officers responded to a reported personal injury accident in the area of County Road
24 and Hunter Drive. Upon arrival Officers found a single vehicle rollover accident and the driver
was being assisted out of the vehicle by passerbys. The driver said she had been westbound on County
Road 24 and believes she blacked out and did not remember going into the ditch. The driver sustained
minor injuries and was transported to the hospital by North Ambulance.
On 10/13/2021 Officer took a report of suspicious activity that had taken place in the Target parking
lot earlier in the morning. A person had stopped by our office to report while waiting out in the lot for
his wife to shop he witnessed a person walking through the lot and believed he was trying door
handles on vehicles. The reporting party took photos of the vehicle and person and was able to
provide them to the officer. The Officer was able to read the license plate of the vehicle which came
back to as Asphalt company. The Officer was able to make some calls and eventually was able to
make contact with the person who was seen in the Target parking lot. He advised he worked for the
paving company who had just completed patchwork in the parking lot and was taking pictures of the
patchwork that was done. No criminal activity was suspected to have taken place.
Investigations:
Investigator McKinley was on vacation this week.
1
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director
DATE October 13, 2021
MEETING: October 19, 2021
SUBJECT: Public Works Update
STREETS
• I am compiling a list of potholes and other street patching areas which we will
address before winter arrives.
• I will present a list of dead-end city streets and the financial effect on the road
budget for overlays at the work session. I will be in attendance to answer
questions.
WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER
• We have cut over to the new operating system at the Treatment Plant. To flush
out any inconsistencies or possible issues we are running both systems
simultaneously.
• Seasonal hydrant flushing has commenced. We handled a malfunction on the
(very old) Morningside system which resulted in hours of repair and the
replacement of a hydrant and two valves. Because this system has been an issue
for many years, I am researching options to replace the water main. My objective
is to accomplish this while keeping the street in one piece.
• By the end of the month all system water in the Hamel area will flow through the
treatment plant to lower the Manganese level to the MDH recommended standard.
We still need to develop a mitigation plan and notify the other smaller systems at
Morningside and Independence Beach.
PARKS/TRAILS
• We are back to work at Hunter Park, the base and subbase for the courts area is in.
We have some storm piping to complete and I will engage a contractor to rough
grade the ballfield this fall (if possible).
• Public Works has completed the Loram Trail which is already proving to be a
great addition to the Medina Trail System.
• Public Works is in the process of winterizing the field house. The irrigation
system has been blown out at the community center and the baseball fields.
• Derek Reinking and I assessed Harriot’s Woods in the Enclave and found several
large trees need to be downed along the trail corridor.
PERSONNEL
• Greg Leuer, our Water Operator, will be recognized for 15 years at this meeting.
MEMORANDUM
2
• Our selection for the Maintenance Worker position did not pass the final
screening processes so we will continue the search to fill this position. We will
utilize our part-time help until a replacement is found.
• An accident with an injury requiring stiches took place while blowing out lines at
the field house. We are investigating the root cause and will complete a
corrective action to ensure risk of injury is low, and safety remains a top priority.
MISCELLANEOUS
• I attended a Celebration Day recap meeting where concerns were voiced about the
significant increase of staff time it took to pull off the event. The big question
might be whether Medina is attempting to grow the event or if we are happy with
the small-town feel.
ORDER CHECKS OCTOBER 5, 2021 – OCTOBER 19, 2021
052088 ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS ........................................ $1,634.81
052089 BEAUDRY OIL & PROPANE ................................................... $2,699.35
052090 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. ................................................... $257.07
052091 CONTEMPORARY IMAGES ......................................................... $41.24
052092 DREXEL, MICHAEL ...................................................................... $23.40
052093 ECM PUBLISHERS INC .............................................................. $142.47
052094 EDLUND, PATRICIA/TODD ................................................... $10,000.00
052095 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL ...................................................... $419.85
052096 GRAINGER.................................................................................. $130.80
052097 HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES I .............................. $1,000.00
052098 HAMEL LUMBER INC ................................................................. $223.42
052099 HAMEL LIONS CLUB .................................................................. $975.00
052100 HASSAN SAND & GRAVEL ..................................................... $7,856.38
052101 HAWKINS INC. ......................................................................... $1,626.64
052102 HENN CTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR ......................................... $57.50
052103 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC ............................................................. $411.79
052104 JOHNSON JET-LINE INC ........................................................ $1,500.00
052105 KRAEMER MINING AND MATERIALS .................................... $2,665.90
052106 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR ................................................... $571.50
052107 US HOME CORP ................................................................... $50,000.00
052108 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT INC .......................................... $44.00
052109 METRO ALARM CONTRACTORS INC ...................................... $204.95
052110 METRO ELEVATOR INC ............................................................ $200.00
052111 METRO WEST INSPECTION ................................................ $11,768.99
052112 MORRIS ELECTRONICS INC. ................................................... $240.00
052113 NELSON ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR ................................... $2,030.00
052114 OFFICE DEPOT .......................................................................... $361.08
052115 RESULTS TITLE ........................................................................... $23.40
052116 SCHERERS PUMPKIN PATCH .................................................. $180.00
052117 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC ......................................... $45.38
052118 STREICHER'S ............................................................................. $320.92
052119 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC ......................................... $589.68
052120 TALLEN & BAERTSCHI ........................................................... $4,024.94
052121 TIMESAVER OFFSITE ................................................................ $375.25
052122 WE CAN RIDE, INC ............................................................... $10,000.00
Total Checks $112,645.71
ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS OCTOBER 5, 2021 – OCTOBER 19, 2021
006109E FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL ........................................ $150.00
006110E CIPHER LABORATORIES INC. ............................................... $4,951.72
006111E FURTHER...................................................................................... $36.27
006112E ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICE .................................................... $5,317.88
006113E FP MAILING SOL POSTAGE BY PHON ................................. $1,000.00
006114E FURTHER...................................................................................... $55.44
006115E PAYMENT SERVICE NETWORK INC ..................................... $1,324.08
006116E XCEL ENERGY ........................................................................ $3,654.72
Total Electronic Checks $16,490.11
PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT – OCTOBER 13, 2021
0511362 BILLMAN, JACKSON CARROLL ................................................ $688.67
0511363 COOK, JUSTIN W ....................................................................... $451.52
0511364 ALBERS, TODD M. ..................................................................... $230.87
0511365 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L. ....................................................... $736.25
0511366 BARNHART, ERIN A. ............................................................... $2,492.82
0511367 BAUMGARDNER, COLETTE J ................................................... $424.43
0511368 BOECKER, KEVIN D. ............................................................... $2,750.28
0511369 CAVANAUGH, JOSEPH ............................................................. $230.87
0511370 CONVERSE, KEITH A. ............................................................ $2,091.45
0511371 DEMARS, LISA ........................................................................ $1,436.12
0511372 DESLAURIES, DEAN .................................................................. $230.87
0511373 DION, DEBRA A. ...................................................................... $2,009.13
0511374 ENDE, JOSEPH ....................................................................... $1,957.03
0511375 FINKE, DUSTIN D. ................................................................... $2,649.78
0511376 GALLUP, JODI M. .................................................................... $2,148.71
0511377 GLEASON, JOHN M................................................................. $1,971.44
0511378 GREGORY, THOMAS .............................................................. $2,025.60
0511379 HALL, DAVID M. ....................................................................... $2,071.11
0511380 HANSON, JUSTIN .................................................................... $2,306.68
0511381 JACOBSON, NICOLE ................................................................. $905.59
0511382 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S. ........................................................... $2,656.45
0511383 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. .............................................................. $2,093.01
0511384 KLAERS, ANNE M. .................................................................. $1,509.77
0511385 LEUER, GREGORY J. ............................................................. $2,252.46
0511386 MARTIN, KATHLEEN M .............................................................. $327.07
0511387 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. ................................................... $1,427.16
0511388 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D ........................................................... $2,054.72
0511389 NELSON, JASON ..................................................................... $2,622.69
0511390 REID, ROBIN ............................................................................... $230.87
0511391 REINKING, DEREK M .............................................................. $2,205.50
0511392 SCHARF, ANDREW ................................................................. $1,607.42
0511393 SCHERER, STEVEN T. ........................................................... $2,389.83
0511394 VINCK, JOHN J ........................................................................ $1,793.68
0511395 VOGEL, NICHOLE ...................................................................... $956.12
0511396 BURSCH, JEFFREY ................................................................... $994.61
Total Payroll Direct Deposit $54,930.58