HomeMy Public PortalAbout12.15.2020 Complete City Council Meeting Packet Posted 12/10/2020 Page 1 of 1
AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, December 15, 2020
7:00 P.M.
Meeting to be held telephonically/virtually
pursuant Minn. Stat. Sec. 13D.021
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Minutes of the December 1, 2020 Regular Council Meeting
V. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approve 2021 Tobacco License Renewals
B. Approve Homestead Application User Agreement with Hennepin County
C. Approve Final Pay Request for Arrowhead Drive Railroad Crossing Improvement Project
D. Resolution Establishing Polling Places for 2021
E. Resolution Granting an Amended Conditional Use Permit to Three Rivers Park District for the Outdoor
Learning Center Located at 4001 County Road 24
VI. COMMENTS
A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda
B. Park Commission
C. Planning Commission
VII. PRESENTATIONS
A. Resolution Recognizing Jeff Pederson for Years of Dedicated Service to the City of Medina as a
City Council Member & Planning Commissioner
B. Resolution Recognizing John Anderson for Years of Dedicated Service to the City of Medina as a
City Council Member & Planning Commissioner
C. Sheriff Hutchinson Presentation
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Mark Smith (Mark of Excellence Homes) – Weston Woods – Preliminary Plat and PUD General
Plan of Development – E. of Mohawk Dr., N. of Hwy 55 and 1952 Chippewa Road
B. Ordinance Amending Chapter 6 of the City Code of Ordinances Regarding Tobacco, Tobacco-
Related Devices, and Electronic Delivery Devices
1. Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance by Title and Summary
C. Ordinance Amending Regulations Pertaining to Minimum Area Per Dwelling Unit in the R3, R4,
MU, and MXR Zoning Districts; Amending Chapter 8 of the City Code
1. Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance by Title and Summary
D. Ordinance Establishing the Meadowview Commons Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District –
Public Hearing
1. Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance by Title and Summary
E. Discuss Trees for Clean-up Day
IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT
X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Council Members Pederson and Anderson – General Insights and Liaison Information
XI. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS
XII. ADJOURN
Telephonic/Virtual Meeting
Call-in Instructions
Join via Microsoft Teams to view
presentations at this link:
https://medinamn.us/council/
For audio only: Dial 1-612-517-3122
Enter Conference ID: 796 327 051#
MEMORANDUM
TO: Medina Mayor and City Council
FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator
DATE OF REPORT: December 10, 2020
DATE OF MEETING: December 15, 2020
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report
Telephonic/Virtual Meeting Call-in Instructions
Join via Microsoft Teams to view presentations at this link: https://medinamn.us/council/
For audio only: Dial 1-612-517-3122; Enter Conference ID: 796 327 051#
V. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approve 2021 Tobacco License Renewals – Staff recommends Council approval for the
2021 tobacco license renewals.
See attached memo.
B. Approve Homestead Application User Agreement with Hennepin County – Hennepin
County has a new online homestead application program. The attached user agreement
allows our City Assessor Rolf Erickson to use the software. Staff recommends approval.
See attached agreement.
C. Approve Final Pay Request for Arrowhead Drive Railroad Crossing Improvement Project
– Staff recommends approval of the final pay request upon receiving the items listed in the
attached letter from WSB.
See attached letter and pay request.
D. Resolution Establishing Polling Places for 2021 – Minnesota Statutes 204B.16, subd.1
requires the City Council, by ordinance or resolution, to designate polling places by
December 31 of each year for the upcoming year. At this time, Medina does not plan on
holding any local elections in 2021, but the resolution should be adopted in the event an
election is needed. Staff recommends approval.
See attached resolution.
E. Resolution Granting an Amended Conditional Use Permit to Three Rivers Park District for
the Outdoor Learning Center Located at 4001 County Road 24 – Council reviewed this
item at the December 1st meeting and directed staff to prepare the attached resolution. Staff
recommends approval.
See attached resolution.
2
VII. PRESENTATIONS
A. Resolution Recognizing Jeff Pederson for Years of Dedicated Service to the City of Medina
as a City Council Member & Planning Commissioner – This will be Council Member
Pederson’s last public meeting as a Council member. The attached resolution provides a
snapshot of all that has been accomplished during his tenure with the city. Thank you to
Council Member Pederson for his years of service to the City of Medina.
See attached resolution.
Recommended Motion: Motion to adopt resolution recognizing Jeff Pederson for years
of dedicated service to the City of Medina as a council member & planning commissioner
B. Resolution Recognizing John Anderson for Years of Dedicated Service to the City of
Medina as a City Council Member & Planning Commissioner – This will also be Council
Member Anderson’s last public meeting as a Council member. The attached resolution
provides a snapshot of all that has been accomplished during his tenure with the city. Thank
you to Council Member Anderson for his years of service to the City of Medina.
See attached resolution.
Recommended Motion: Motion to adopt resolution recognizing John Anderson for years
of dedicated service to the City of Medina as a council member & planning commissioner
C. Sheriff Hutchinson Presentation – Hennepin County Sheriff Dave Hutchinson will provide
an update to the Council on activities within the Sheriff’s office.
No attachments for this item.
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Mark Smith (Mark of Excellence Homes – Weston Woods – Preliminary Plat and PUD
General Plan of Development – E. of Mohawk Dr., N. of Hwy 55 and 1952 Chippewa Road
- Mark Smith has requested Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) General
Plan approval for a proposed residential development of two properties north of Highway 55
and east of Mohawk Drive. The applicant proposes 150 homes (76 twinhomes on northern
property and a combination of 42 single-family, 32 townhomes, and a 5.1 acre park/open
space on the southern property). The Planning Commission held a public hearing on
November 10th and unanimously recommended approval subject to the conditions in the
staff report.
See attached report.
Recommended Motion # 1: Move to direct staff to resubmit the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment with the updated land use configuration of the southern property to the
Metropolitan Council for review.
3
Recommended Motion #2: Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution granting PUD
General Plan and Preliminary Plat approval subject to the conditions noted in the staff
report.
B. Ordinance Amending Chapter 6 of the City Code of Ordinances Regarding Tobacco,
Tobacco-Related Devices, and Electronic Delivery Devices – An ordinance has been
prepared which would amend the city’s tobacco regulations. The primary goal of the
amendment is to make the city’s regulations consistent with recently enacted state and
federal legislation which now prohibits the sale of tobacco and related products to persons
under the age of 21. Please know that the proposed ordinance does not amend the city’s
current regulations regarding underage possession, use, and procurement (“PUP”) of
tobacco, tobacco-related products, or electronic delivery devices. Such regulations are
currently contained in section 615.19, subdivisions 2-4. The city currently prohibits persons
under 18 years of age from possessing, using, and procuring tobacco, tobacco-related
products, and nicotine delivery devices. Given the recent legislative changes prohibiting
sales to persons under 21, the council might also desire to increase the age for PUP-related
offenses to 21.
See attached memo, ordinance, and resolution.
Recommended Motion # 1: Adopt ordinance amending chapter 6 of the city code of
ordinances regarding tobacco, tobacco-related devices, and electronic delivery devices [as
presented] OR [with the following change(s)…].
Recommended Motion # 2: Adopt resolution authorizing publication of ordinance by title
and summary.
C. Ordinance Amending Regulations Pertaining to Minimum Area Per Dwelling Unit in the
R3, R4, MU, and MXR Zoning Districts; Amending Chapter 8 of the City Code – Earlier
this fall, the City received correspondence from the Minnesota Department of Labor and
Industry (DOLI) that the agency believed the City’s zoning ordinance providing additional
density for enhanced sound suppression was inconsistent with the building code. A
community is not allowed to adopt building code standards which are inconsistent with the
state building code. While updating the ordinance, staff took the opportunity to consider the
density regulations more broadly. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their
December 8th meeting and recommended approval of the attached ordinance.
See attached memo, ordinance, and resolution.
Recommended Motion # 1: Adopt ordinance amending regulations pertaining to minimum
area per dwelling unit in the R3, R4, MU, and MXR zoning districts; amending chapter 8 of
the city code
4
Recommended Motion # 2: Adopt resolution authorizing publication of ordinance by title
and summary.
D. Ordinance Establishing the Meadowview Commons Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District
– Public Hearing – The City Council granted final plat approval of Meadowview Commons
at the November 17 meeting. The City’s practice is to require that homeowners’
associations maintain stormwater improvements within developments. This is formalized
through an agreement that is recorded against each property. This agreement has been
executed by the owner with regard to the Meadowview Commons development.
Additionally, the City’s practice is to establish Storm Sewer Improvement Taxing District
over development sites as a “back-up plan” if the homeowner’s association does not
maintain stormwater improvements. The City has taken this step in all recent residential
subdivisions. The City Council is required to hold a public hearing for this item.
See attached memo, ordinance, and resolution.
Recommended Motion # 1: Adopt ordinance establishing the Meadowview Commons
Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District
Recommended Motion # 2: Adopt resolution authorizing publication of ordinance by title
and summary.
E. Discuss Trees for Clean-up Day – Public Works Director Steve Scherer would like the
Council’s support in moving forward with planning Clean-up Day for 2021 and ordering the
trees as part of Medina’s reforestation efforts.
See attached memo.
X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Council Members Pederson and Anderson – General Insights and Liaison Information –
Council members Pederson and Anderson will be providing a verbal update on the groups
they have served as liaisons for the City and providing their general insights.
No attachments for this item.
XI. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS
Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 005733E-005756E for $94,970.86
and order check numbers 051002-051073 for $201,930.84, and payroll EFT 0510650-0510711
for $109,281.07.
INFORMATION PACKET:
Planning Department Update
Police Department Update
Public Works Department Update
Claims List
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1
December 1, 2020
DRAFT 1
2
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 1, 2020 3
4
The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on December 1, 2020 at 5
7:00 p.m. virtually. Mayor Martin presided. 6
7
Martin read a statement explaining that meetings continue to be held in a virtual format 8
due to the ongoing pandemic and provided instructions on how members of the public 9
can participate in the meeting. 10
11
I. ROLL CALL 12
13
Members present: Albers, Anderson, DesLauriers, and Martin. 14
15
Members absent: Pederson. 16
17
Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, Assistant City Administrator Jodi 18
Gallup, City Attorney Ron Batty, Finance Director Erin Barnhart, City Engineer Jim 19
Stremel, City Planning Director Dusty Finke, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, and 20
Chief of Police Jason Nelson. 21
22
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:07 p.m.) 23
24
III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:07 p.m.) 25
The agenda was approved as presented. 26
27
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:08 p.m.) 28
29
A. Approval of the November 13, 2020 Special City Council Meeting Minutes 30
31
32
Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers, to approve the November 13, 2020 special City 33
Council meeting minutes as presented. 34
35
A roll call vote was performed: 36
37
Pederson absent 38
Anderson aye 39
DesLauriers aye 40
Albers aye 41
Martin aye 42
43
Motion passed unanimously. 44
45
B. Approval of the November 17, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 46
Martin noted that prior to the meeting proposed changes from herself and Anderson 47
were distributed to be incorporated into the minutes. 48
49
Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers, to approve the November 17, 2020 regular City 50
Council meeting minutes as amended. 51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2
December 1, 2020
1
A roll call vote was performed: 2
3
Pederson absent 4
Anderson aye 5
DesLauriers aye 6
Albers aye 7
Martin aye 8
9
Motion passed unanimously. 10
11
V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:10 p.m.) 12
13
A. Approve LMCIT Liability Insurance Renewal Waiver 14
B. Approve 2021 Rate Schedule with Kennedy and Graven 15
C. Approve Continuing Education Program Request for Police Officer Andrew 16
Scharf 17
D. Resolution No. 2020-93 Approving a Preliminary Plat for a Subdivision to 18
be Known as “Holy Name Lake Estates” 19
Moved by Martin, seconded by DesLauriers, to approve the consent agenda. 20
21
A roll call vote was performed: 22
23
Pederson absent 24
Anderson aye 25
DesLauriers aye 26
Martin aye 27
Albers aye 28
29
Motion passed unanimously. 30
31
VI. COMMENTS (7:11 p.m.) 32
33
A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 34
There were none. 35
36
B. Park Commission 37
Park Commissioner Theis reported that the Commission met in November and the 38
majority of the discussion focused on the Weston Woods proposal, noting that the 39
Commission recommended dedication of the preserved wooded area as well as the trail 40
along Chippewa Road and through the townhome area. She noted that she requested 41
that the conservation easement boundaries be marked. 42
43
Albers asked if there is a plan to open the skating rinks once the weather permits. 44
45
Scherer stated that he does not see a reason the skating rinks cannot be opened along 46
with the sledding hill. He stated that he is unsure if the warming house would be open 47
based on COVID restrictions. 48
49
Albers commented that having the outdoor elements would make sense but agreed that 50
he would be leery of the warming house. 51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3
December 1, 2020
1
Nelson asked that Scherer call him the following day to ensure that those activities 2
would not conflict with the most recent orders from the Governor. 3
4
C. Planning Commission 5
Finke reported that the Planning Commission will meet the following week to hold a 6
public hearing to consider an ordinance amendment related to density lot requirements 7
and bonuses, specifically related to sound suppression. 8
9
VII. NEW BUSINESS 10
11
A. 2021 Budget (7:19 p.m.) 12
Martin commended staff and the Council for sharpening pencils and thinking about 13
impacts on the economy that could result because of the ongoing pandemic. 14
15
1. Budget and Tax Levy Presentation – Public Comment 16
Barnhart reviewed the changes from 2020 to 2021 related to the general fund and 17
budget. She stated that the primary goals for this budget were to plan for the unknown 18
and keep a flat tax rate. She stated that much of the proposed increase is due to new 19
growth that is hitting the tax base. She explained that the City was able to capture that 20
growth and continue to build reserves to plan for the future. She reviewed some of the 21
items that were out of the control of the City including health insurance and other 22
personnel costs. She displayed the expenditures broken down per department, noting 23
that police and emergency services is the largest staff and expenditure of the City as 24
that department operates 24/7. She advised that the debt services levy will be reduced 25
going into 2021 and provided additional explanation. She reviewed the tax levy 26
comparison of the City to the neighboring communities. She reviewed the information 27
from Hennepin County related to market value and tax capacity. She explained how 28
property taxes are allocated between the different entities. She reviewed the City’s debt 29
levels and other budget information including proposed utility rates. She noted that 30
some City and/or road projects have been further spaced out to better allow for any 31
impacts that could occur because of the pandemic. 32
33
Scherer provided additional details on proposed road improvements included for 2021. 34
35
Barnhart provided details on different grants/aid that the City receives and/or will receive 36
in 2021. 37
38
Martin thanked staff for the thorough presentation. 39
40
Martin opened the public hearing. 41
42
No comments. 43
44
Martin closed the public hearing. 45
46
Anderson thanked staff for their hard work in putting this together. He referenced the 47
year to date and budget figures for fire and asked for details on the overage that 48
occurred in 2020. 49
50
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4
December 1, 2020
Barnhart stated that the City does not know how much State aid will be provided for fire 1
services and explained that the City budgets conservatively, so if additional funds are 2
received from State aid it can show as a higher expenditure because the City pays that 3
out to fire. She confirmed that she could provide additional information to the Council via 4
email. 5
6
Albers complimented staff for the outstanding job they did guiding the Council through 7
the discussions of the past several months to get to this point. 8
9
2. Resolution No. 2020-94 Approving 2021 Final Tax Levy 10
Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Albers, to Adopt Resolution No. 2020-94 Approving 11
the 2021 Final Tax Levy. 12
13
A roll call vote was performed: 14
15
Pederson absent 16
Anderson aye 17
DesLauriers aye 18
Albers aye 19
Martin aye 20
21
Motion passed unanimously. 22
23
3. Resolution No. 2020-95 Approving 2021 Final Budget 24
Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Albers, to Adopt Resolution No. 2020-95 Approving 25
the 2021 Final Budget. 26
27
A roll call vote was performed: 28
29
Pederson absent 30
Anderson aye 31
DesLauriers aye 32
Albers aye 33
Martin aye 34
35
Motion passed unanimously. 36
37
4. Resolution No. 2020-96 Reducing Debt Service Tax Levies for 2021 38
Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Albers, to Adopt Resolution No. 2020-96 Reducing 39
Debt Service Tax Levies for 2021. 40
41
A roll call vote was performed: 42
43
Pederson absent 44
Anderson aye 45
DesLauriers aye 46
Albers aye 47
Martin aye 48
49
Motion passed unanimously. 50
51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5
December 1, 2020
B. Ordinance No. 663 Adopting an Amended Fee Schedule (7:47 p.m.) 1
Johnson stated that this item requires a public hearing. 2
3
Martin opened the public hearing. 4
5
No comments made. 6
7
Martin closed the public hearing. 8
9
Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Albers, to adopt Ordinance No. 663 Adopting an 10
Amended Fee Schedule. 11
12
A roll call vote was performed: 13
14
Pederson absent 15
Anderson aye 16
DesLauriers aye 17
Albers aye 18
Martin aye 19
20
Motion passed unanimously. 21
22
1. Resolution No. 2020-97 Authorizing Publication of Ordinance No. 23
663 by Title and Summary 24
Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Albers, to adopt Resolution No. 2020-97 25
Authorizing Publication of Ordinance No. 663 by Title and Summary. 26
27
A roll call vote was performed: 28
29
Pederson absent 30
Anderson aye 31
DesLauriers aye 32
Albers aye 33
Martin aye 34
35
Motion passed unanimously. 36
37
C. Three Rivers Park District – Baker Park Outdoor Learning Center – 38
Conditional Use Permit Amendment (7:51 p.m.) 39
Johnson provided background information on the Three Rivers Park District Outdoor 40
Learning Center Conditional Use Permit noting that the Planning Commission reviewed 41
the request and recommended approval. 42
43
Finke presented the request from Three Rivers Park at their Outdoor Learning Center to 44
add a building that would include showers and an infirmary for those camping on the 45
site. He stated that the exterior of the building is meant to match the existing larger 46
lodge with log siding. The applicant is proposing to possibly use solar panels on the 47
building, noting that those would have to meet relevant standards when the applicable 48
permits are requested. He noted that this would be an accessory use to those already 49
occurring on the property. He stated that the Conditional Use Permit criteria are listed 50
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 6
December 1, 2020
within the staff report and confirmed that the Planning Commission unanimously 1
recommended approval of the CUP amendment. 2
3
Anderson asked if the road leading to the new building would support emergency 4
vehicles, should that be necessary to access the infirmary. 5
6
Finke replied that this was coordinated with the Maple Plain Fire Department, who 7
provides service to this area. He noted that some widening will occur to ensure 8
accommodation of emergency service vehicles. 9
10
Marge Beard, Three Rivers Park District, provided background information on the site 11
which has eight log cabins, a lodge and many other amenities which supports over 150 12
overnight visits per year. She stated that over 18,000 guests are served annually at this 13
facility and this dual-purpose building will meet the needs of those visitors. 14
15
Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Albers, to direct staff to prepare a resolution 16
approving the amended CUP subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning 17
Commission. 18
19
A roll call vote was performed: 20
21
Pederson absent 22
Anderson aye 23
DesLauriers aye 24
Albers aye 25
Martin aye 26
27
Motion passed unanimously. 28
29
D. Fire Department Services Contract Notification Letters (8:01 p.m.) 30
Martin thanked staff for the draft letters and incorporation of the language suggested by 31
Anderson. 32
33
Johnson thanked Martin, DesLauriers, Anderson and Batty for working with staff to draft 34
the letters to the Fire Departments which request amendments to the contracts to allow 35
transition to a Fire Service District/Joint Powers Agreement. He noted that if approved 36
the letters would be sent to the applicable fire departments on December 31, 2020. 37
38
DesLauriers appreciated the additional items that Anderson added, and he is excited to 39
continue to move forward with all the Fire Departments. 40
41
Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Anderson, to direct staff to mail fire department 42
services contract notification letters to the Hamel, Maple Plain, and Loretto Fire 43
Departments on December 31, 2020. 44
45
A roll call vote was performed: 46
47
Pederson absent 48
Anderson aye 49
DesLauriers aye 50
Albers aye 51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 7
December 1, 2020
Martin aye 1
2
Motion passed unanimously. 3
4
VIII. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (8:05 p.m.) 5
Johnson had nothing further to report. 6
7
IX. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (8:05 p.m.) 8
DesLauriers commented that the parks continue to get a lot of use and it is exciting to 9
see people using it. 10
11
Martin advised of a recent presentation provided to the Northwest Mayors group related 12
to the housing market in the western Hennepin area noting that she would attempt to 13
share the information with Johnson to distribute to the Council. 14
15
X. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (8:08 p.m.) 16
Moved by Anderson, seconded by DesLauriers, to approve the bills, EFT 0057828E-17
005732E for $24,943.17, order check numbers 050951-051001 for $184,605.22. 18
19
A roll call vote was performed: 20
21
Pederson absent 22
Anderson aye 23
DesLauriers aye 24
Albers aye 25
Martin aye 26
27
Motion passed unanimously. 28
29
XI. ADJOURN 30
Moved by Albers, seconded by DesLauriers, to adjourn the meeting at 8:11 p.m. 31
32
A roll call vote was performed: 33
34
Pederson absent 35
Anderson aye 36
DesLauriers aye 37
Albers aye 38
Martin aye 39
40
Motion passed unanimously. 41
42
43
__________________________________ 44
Kathleen Martin, Mayor 45
Attest: 46
47
____________________________________ 48
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk 49
MEMORANDUM
TO: Medina City Council
FROM: Jodi Gallup, Assistant City Administrator
DATE: December 9, 2020
RE: Approval of 2021 Tobacco Licenses
The following businesses have applied to renew their tobacco licenses effective January
1, 2021 through December 31, 2021. All have paid the fee required and submitted the
proper forms.
2021-01 Casey’s Retail Company
2021-02 Medina Golf and Country Club
2021-03 Holiday Companies – CSAH 29
2021-04 Koch’s Korner, LLC
2021-05 Holiday Companies– 200 TH 55
2021-06 Hwy 55 Liquors
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Motion to approve the above listed tobacco licenses for 2021.
COUNCIL AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED
The following businesses have not submitted their renewal paperwork in time for the
packet deadline. I would also like to request Council approval/authorization to
administratively issue their tobacco license renewals upon receiving the proper forms
and license fees:
- Liquor Depot, Inc
- Inn Kahoots
Agenda Item # 5A
- 1 -
HOMESTEAD APPLICATION USER AGREEMENT
This Homestead Application User Agreement (“HAUA”)is between Hennepin County,
State of Minnesota, (“COUNTY”) and the City of Medina (“USER”).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, assessors may require proof of the facts upon which property may be
classified as a homestead as set forth in Minn. Stat. §273.124;
WHERAS, homestead applications and program information are maintained by
COUNTY in an electronic database (individually and collectively, said data may be
referred to herein as “Homestead Application Data”);
WHEREAS, Homestead Application Data may include social security numbers or federal
identification numbers which are classified, as applicable, as private data pursuant to
Minn. Stat. §§ 13.355, 273.124 and 273.1245;
WHEREAS, COUNTY operates, controls, manages and maintains a web-based software
application which enables access to the Homestead Application Data (the “Software”);
and
WHEREAS, USER may access, use, modify, add or remove homestead applications from
the Homestead Application Data database.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements set
forth herein, the COUNTY and USER agree as follows:
1. Term.
This HAUA shall commence upon signature by COUNTY and shall expire on
___________, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the provisions of
this HAUA. Thereafter upon expiration of a term, unless terminated pursuant
to the provisions herein, this HAUA shall automatically renew for an additional
one year period.
2. Licenses and Related Obligations.
COUNTY hereby grants USER a limited and revocable license to use the
Software and the Homestead Application Data exclusively for the purpose of
processing homestead applications as required by applicable law. Use of the
Agenda Item # 5B
- 2 -
Software or Homestead Application Data for any purpose other than
processing homestead applications is strictly prohibited. USER shall exercise all
reasonable efforts to ensure that its individual users, including but not limited
to employees and/or contractors, will not use the Software or the Homestead
Application Data for any reason other than processing homestead applications,
including but not limited to any personal use, generally looking at/for any
information about any individuals, public or private, for any other reason,
furtive or otherwise, use related to other government tasks/functions, or
otherwise using the Software or Homestead Application Data for any reason
other than processing homestead applications. The rights granted to USER
pursuant to this section may be collectively referred to as the "License".
Unless COUNTY otherwise agrees in writing, use of the Software and
Homestead Application Data shall be restricted to USER’s employees. USER
shall identify, in writing, each requested employee user(s). Subject to the
provisions herein, COUNTY shall issue COUNTY approved USER employees
unique login credentials and a password.
Upon notice by COUNTY, USER shall certify that an employee user has
undergone background screening, including but not limited to: (i) Criminal
Records Search: County Felony and Misdemeanor Criminal Records Search:
Federal Standard Criminal; (ii) Civil Records Search: County Civil; (iii) Social
Security Number Death Master Search Motor Vehicle Records Credit Report;
(iv) Bankruptcy Records Search; and (v) Government Registries Search. If a
background screening is returned with a finding, USER shall notify COUNTY in
writing. COUNTY expressly reserves the right to refuse access to any individual.
USER shall be solely responsible for the costs of required background checks.
The Software and the Homestead Application Data shall only be accessed and
used in compliance with the terms of this HAUA. USER shall notify and
document that all employees with access to the Software or Homestead
Application Data of the obligations imposed by this Agreement and, unless
COUNTY otherwise agrees, shall ensure that those employees agree in writing
to comply with all applicable obligations herein. USER agrees, on behalf of
itself and its employees, to comply with the following:
(i) USER shall safeguard and protect the Software and Homestead
Application Data from unauthorized access;
(ii) USER shall restrict access to the Software and Homestead
Application Data to USER’s designated and approved employee(s);
- 3 -
(iii) USER’s designated and duly authorized employees with access to
the Software and/or Homestead Application Data shall complete data
practices and security training provided by USER and approved
COUNTY;
(iv) except as required by applicable law, USER shall not disclose any
Homestead Application Data to any third-party during the term of this
Agreement or at any time thereafter;
(v) USER shall use, control, and safeguard all Homestead Application
Data in accordance with generally accepted industry standards, all laws,
and all then applicable COUNTY policies, procedures, rules, and
directions;
(vi) USER shall protect and keep private and secure all access credentials
and passwords and shall not release either to any unauthorized
individual;
(vii) USER shall secure and safeguard credentials and passwords in the
same manner that USER secures and safeguards its own critical or
confidential systems, software, data, passwords, material or other
information;
(viii) unless COUNTY otherwise agrees, USER shall only permit access to
the Software from USER owned computers that are physically located in
USER’s secure facilities;
(ix) all USER systems, software and equipment used to access the
Software shall meet COUNTY’s technical operating and security system
requirements, including but not limited to installing and/or maintaining
COUNTY approved firewalls, proxies, filters and other monitors and
controls;
(x) USER shall not alter or disable any hardware or software security
programs residing on COUNTY systems;
(xi) USER shall not access the Homestead Application Data by any
means other than the Software including but not limited to scraping,
robots, wanderers, crawlers, spiders, etc (as those terms are commonly
used and understood in the information technology industry);
- 4 -
(xii) if any USER personnel with access to the Software no longer
requires said access or is no longer processing homestead applications,
USER shall immediately notify COUNTY and ensure that said individual
no longer has access to the Software or Homestead Application Data,
including but not limited to deleting, eliminating and destroying all
access points, usernames, passwords and/or other applicable
credentials. Any notice required by the foregoing shall be provided to
the COUNTY Contract Administrator (as identified in the CONTRACT
ADMINISTRATION provisions below);
(xiii) COUNTY may terminate, deny or revoke access to the Software
and/or Homestead Application Data at any time and without notice;
(xiv) if any USER personnel with access to authentication or passwords
no longer requires said access, including but not limited to situations
where the individual is no longer a USER employee or contractor
and/or is no longer performing assessing functions, USER shall
immediately notify the County Facilitator, or his/her designee, and
ensure that said individual no longer has access to authentication and
passwords, including but not limited to deleting, eliminating and
destroying all access points, usernames, passwords and/or other
applicable credentials; and
(xv) USER shall immediately notify COUNTY of any known or suspected
security breach or unauthorized access to Homestead Application Data,
including but not limited to any breach or non-compliance with the
provisions in this HAUA, then comply with all responsive directions
provided by COUNTY.
Except as set forth herein, USER shall acquire no right, title or interest in or to
the Software or the Homestead Application Data.
3. Compliance with Applicable Law and Data.
USER shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local statutes,
regulations, rules and ordinances currently in force or later enacted including
but not limited to the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices
Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 (MGDPA).USER agrees to cooperate with
any audit activities as required by County.
- 5 -
Unless the parties otherwise agree, USER expressly authorizes COUNTY to
respond to MGDPA requests to inspect or copy the Software, pursuant to
applicable law and COUNTY’s then-current policy. USER shall 1) direct the
request to the Contract Administrator (identified below); 2) explain to the
requesting party that the request has been directed to the COUNTY and
communicate appropriate COUNTY contact information; and 3) perform any
other reasonable tasks necessary to expedite fulfillment of the request.
4. No Costs.
USER shall not pay COUNTY any amount for access and use of the Software
and/or Homestead Application Data.
5. Termination.
COUNTY may terminate this HAUA, and thereby terminate the License and
USER’s Access to the Software and Homestead Application Data, at any time by
providing USER with written notice of said termination. USER may terminate
its participation in this HAUA upon thirty (30) day written notice to COUNTY.
6. Liability.
USER agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the COUNTY and each
Partner, their officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees from any
liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or
expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, resulting directly or indirectly
from USER’s failure to comply with the terms of this HAUA or failure to perform
any duties and obligations required by applicable law and/or this HAUA. As
applicable, a party’s liability is governed by the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 466. The statutory limits of liability for the parties may not
be added together or stacked to increase the maximum amount of liability for
either or both parties.
7. Contract Administration.
(Name and Title of Contract Manager), or successor (“Contract Administrator”),
shall manage this HAUA on behalf of COUNTY and serve as liaison between
COUNTY and USER.
(Name and Title of Contract Manager), or successor, shall manage this HAUA on
behalf of USER and serve as liaison between COUNTY and USER.
- 6 -
8. Miscellaneous Provisions.
The matters set forth in the “WHEREAS” clauses at the beginning of this HAUA
are by this reference incorporated into and made a part of this HAUA.
The entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and supersedes
all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the
subject matter. Any alterations, variations or modifications of the provisions of
this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as
an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties. If any provision of this
Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the remaining provisions
will not be affected.
The laws of the state of Minnesota shall govern all questions and
interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and
the legal relations between the parties and their performance.
The remainder of this page is blank.
- 7 -
COUNTY AUTHORIZATION
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Reviewed by the County STATE OF MINNESOTA
Attorney's Office
By: ___________________________
Hennepin County Administrator
Date:
USER
Signed By:_______________________
Printed Name: ____________________
Printed Title: _____________________
Date: ____________________________
\\wsbgvfiles01.wsbeng.local\projects\013211-000\Admin\Construction Admin\Pay Vouchers\013211-000 CST LTR VO 3 & FNL CTY-s scherer-121020.docx
7
0
1
X
E
N
I
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
|
S
U
I
T
E
3
0
0
|
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
,
M
N
|
5
5
4
1
6
|
7
6
3
.
5
4
1
.
4
8
0
0
|
W
S
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
December 10, 2020
Mr. Steve Scherer, Public Works Director
City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340
Attn: Scott Johnson, City Administrator
Erin Barnhart, Finance Director
Jennifer Altendorf, Accountant
Re: Construction Pay Voucher No. 3 (Final) and
Final Project Close-Out Documents
Arrowhead Drive Railroad Crossing Improvements (S.A.P. 250-593-001)
City of Medina, MN
WSB Project No. 013211-000
Dear Mr. Scherer:
Please find enclosed Construction Pay Voucher No. 3 and final in the amount of $19,870.46 for
the above-referenced project. This final payment request represents the final quantities for the
project and the release of the retainage on the contract.
We recommend that the City of Medina approve Construction Pay Voucher No. 3 and final for
Minger Construction Co., Inc. at the December 15, 2020, City Council meeting, subject to receipt
of the following items:
1. Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC134 forms).
2. Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the
contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waivers).
3. Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the contractor’s surety.
4. Two-year maintenance bond.
Upon approval by the City Council and receipt of the above items, final payment in the amount of
$19,870.46 can be released to Minger Construction Co., Inc., and the contract for this project will
be finalized and closed out. Once processed, please keep one copy of the pay voucher for your
records and return two copies to our office, one for the contractor and one for our files.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the enclosed, please contact me at
763.287.8532. Thank you.
Sincerely,
WSB
James L. Stremel, PE
City Engineer
Enclosures
cc: Scott Johnson, City of Medina srb
Agenda Item # 5C
Arrowhead Drive Railroad
Crossing Improvements
Final Pay Voucher 3
wsb
Client: City of Medina
2052 County Rd 24
Medina, MN 55340
Contractor: Minger Construction Companies, Inc.
620 Corporate Drive
Jordan, MN 55352
WSB Project No.: 013211-000
Client Project No.: NIA
_
State Project No.: S.A.P. 250-593-001
Federal Project No.:
Contract Amount
Funds Encumbered
Original Contract
Contract Changes
Revised Contract
Work Certified To Date
$426,969.10
$0.00
$426,969.10
Base Bid Items
Contract Changes
Material On Hand
Total
$376,376.29
$0.00
$0.00
$376,376.29
Original
Additional
Total
$426,969.10
N/A
$426,969.10
Work Certified
This Voucher
Work Certified
To Date
Less Amount
Retained
Less Previous
Payments
Amount Paid
This Voucher
Total Amount
Paid To Date
$1.107.00
$376,376.29
$0.00
$356,505.83
$19,870.46
$376,376.29
Percent Retained: 0%
Percent Complete: 88.15%
FINAL PAY VOUCHER
I hereby certify that a Final Examination has been made of the noted Contract, that the Contract has been completed, that the entire
amount of Work Shown in this Final Voucher has been performed and the Total Value of the Work Performed in accordance with, and
pursuant to, the terms of the Contract is as shown in this Final Voucher.
Approved By WSB
November 19, 2020
Date
Approved By City of Medina
Name
Date
Approved y Minger Construction Companies, Inc.
Contra
/1/423/2"6
Date
Page 1 of 6
Arrowhead Drive Railroad
Crossing Improvements Final Pay Voucher 3
Page 2 of 6
Payment Summary
No. Up Through Date Work Certified
Per Voucher
Amount Retained
Per Voucher
Amount Paid
Per Voucher
1 07/09/2020 $317,531.97 $15,876.60 $301,655.37
2 08/07/2020 $57,737.32 $2,886.86 $54,850.46
3 11/16/2020 $1,107.00 -$18,763.46 $19,870.46
Funding Category Name Work Certified
To Date
Less Amount
Retained
Less Previous
Payments
Amount Paid
This Voucher
Total Amount Paid
To Date
SAP 250-593-001
Roadway $284,057.29 $0.00 $268,802.78 $15,254.51 $284,057.29
SAP 250-593-001 Storm $75,819.00 $0.00 $72,028.05 $3,790.95 $75,819.00
SAP 250-593-002
Railroad $16,500.00 $0.00 $15,675.00 $825.00 $16,500.00
Accounting
Number Funding Source Amount Paid
This Voucher
Revised Contract
Amount
Funds
Encumbered
To Date
Paid Contractor
To Date
SAP 250-593-001
Roadway State Aid $15,254.51 $284,057.29
SAP 250-593-001
Storm State Aid $3,790.95 $75,819.00
SAP 250-593-002
Railroad State Aid $825.00 $16,500.00
Contract Item Status
Line
No. Item Description Units Unit Price Contract
Quantity
Quantity
This
Voucher
Amount This
Voucher
Quantity
To Date Amount To Date
1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS $41,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $41,000.00
2 2021.601 RR PROTECTIVE LIABILITY
INSURANCE LS $6,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $6,000.00
3 2102.503 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL L F $1.10 590 0 $0.00 429 $471.90
4 2102.518 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL S F $3.35 252 0 $0.00 48 $160.80
5 2104.502 SALVAGE SIGN EACH $39.00 3 0 $0.00 3 $117.00
6 2104.503 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL
DEPTH) L F $2.50 953 0 $0.00 864 $2,160.00
7 2104.503 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER L F $17.55 308 0 $0.00 618 $10,845.90
8 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y $25.35 439 0 $0.00 404 $10,241.40
9 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE 5 S Y $2.45 573 0 $0.00 241 $590.45
10 2105.601 DEWATERING LS $3,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $3,000.00
11 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON (P) C Y $71.25 191 0 $0.00 191 $13,608.75
12 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y $23.50 459 0 $0.00 250 $5,875.00
Arrowhead Drive Railroad
Crossing Improvements Final Pay Voucher 3
Page 3 of 6
Contract Item Status
Line
No. Item Description Units Unit Price Contract
Quantity
Quantity
This
Voucher
Amount This
Voucher
Quantity
To Date Amount To Date
13 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT
(CV) C Y $34.50 459 0 $0.00 250 $8,625.00
14 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST $331.00 3 0 $0.00 3 $993.00
15 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP
BROOM) HOUR $140.00 20 0 $0.00 9 $1,260.00
16 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 C Y $61.50 145 18 $1,107.00 93 $5,719.50
17 2301.504 CONCRETE PAVEMENT 6" S Y $85.50 77 0 $0.00 62.44 $5,338.62
18 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK
COAT GAL $28.00 14 0 $0.00 50 $1,400.00
19 2360.503 TYPE SP 9.5 WEAR CRS MIX (2,B)
4.0" THICK S Y $45.50 53 0 $0.00 46.67 $2,123.49
20 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE
MIX (3;B) TON $175.00 176 0 $0.00 168.65 $29,513.75
21 2505.601 UTILITY COORDINATION L S $5,500.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $5,500.00
22 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
DESIGN B624 L F $33.50 330 0 $0.00 332 $11,122.00
23 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
DESIGN B818 L F $33.50 395 0 $0.00 654 $21,909.00
24 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS $19,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $19,000.00
25 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F $89.00 80 0 $0.00 79.5 $7,075.50
26 2564.602 INSTALL SIGN EACH $550.00 3 0 $0.00 3 $1,650.00
27 2565.616 REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM SYS $34,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $34,000.00
28 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS $2,000.00 1 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
29 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH $130.00 4 0 $0.00 2 $260.00
30 2573.503 SILT FENCE; TYPE MS L F $2.15 500 0 $0.00 630 $1,354.50
31 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE
WOOD FIBER L F $3.15 500 0 $0.00 500 $1,575.00
32 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE
ROCK L F $4.15 200 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
33 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y $70.00 55 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
34 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS
CATEGORY 3N S Y $2.60 489 0 $0.00 420 $1,092.00
35 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y $1.60 564 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Arrowhead Drive Railroad
Crossing Improvements Final Pay Voucher 3
Page 4 of 6
Contract Item Status
Line
No. Item Description Units Unit Price Contract
Quantity
Quantity
This
Voucher
Amount This
Voucher
Quantity
To Date Amount To Date
36 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB $3.60 38 0 $0.00 38 $136.80
37 2575.604 BLOWN COMPOST SEEDING S Y $6.50 489 0 $0.00 420 $2,730.00
38 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F $3.25 206 0 $0.00 725 $2,356.25
39 2582.503 4" BROKEN LINE PAINT L F $3.25 384 0 $0.00 70 $227.50
40 2582.503 8" SOLID LINE PAINT L F $5.50 196 0 $0.00 204 $1,122.00
41 2582.503 8" BROKEN LINE PAINT L F $5.50 182 0 $0.00 80 $440.00
42 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE PAINT L F $16.00 40 0 $0.00 61 $976.00
43 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PREF TAPE L F $1.30 361 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
44 2582.503 4" BROKEN LINE PREF TAPE L F $1.30 672 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
45 2582.503 8" SOLID LINE PREF TAPE L F $2.60 343 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
46 2582.503 8" BROKEN LINE PREF TAPE L F $2.60 319 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
47 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE PREF TAPE L F $7.75 70 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
48 2582.503 4" DOTTED LINE PREF THERMO GR
IN L F $61.60 100 0 $0.00 24 $1,478.40
49 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F $2.80 288 0 $0.00 45 $126.00
50 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PREF TAPE S F $11.00 504 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
51 2582.518 CROSSWALK PAINT S F $6.70 252 0 $0.00 252 $1,688.40
52 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS $7,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $7,000.00
53 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH $2,089.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $2,089.00
54 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) L F $40.05 50 0 $0.00 50 $2,002.50
55 2123.610 UTILITY CREW HOUR $620.00 4 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
56 2502.503 6" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN L F $29.00 100 0 $0.00 100 $2,900.00
57 2502.602 6" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH $1,299.00 2 0 $0.00 2 $2,598.00
58 2503.503 12" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F $208.00 23 0 $0.00 23 $4,784.00
59 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F $206.50 27 0 $0.00 27 $5,575.50
Arrowhead Drive Railroad
Crossing Improvements Final Pay Voucher 3
Page 5 of 6
Contract Item Status
Line
No. Item Description Units Unit Price Contract
Quantity
Quantity
This
Voucher
Amount This
Voucher
Quantity
To Date Amount To Date
60 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM
SEWER EACH $8,340.50 2 0 $0.00 2 $16,681.00
61 2506.602 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM) EACH $1,044.50 3 0 $0.00 3 $3,133.50
62 2506.502 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
DESIGN SPEC 1 EACH $3,332.50 2 0 $0.00 2 $6,665.00
63 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
DES 48-4020 L F $826.50 25 0 $0.00 25 $20,662.50
64 2506.602 CHIMNEY SEALS EACH $576.00 5 0 $0.00 3 $1,728.00
65 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS $3,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $3,000.00
66 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK S F $34.30 39 0 $0.00 40 $1,372.00
67 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y $110.50 14 0 $0.00 14 $1,547.00
68 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 C Y $140.00 14 0 $0.00 7 $980.00
69 2301.602 DRILL & GROUT DOWEL BAR
(EPOXY COATED) EACH $22.40 10 0 $0.00 10 $224.00
70 2360.503 TYPE SP 9.5 WEAR CRS MIX (2,B)
4.0" THICK S Y $61.60 66 0 $0.00 27.33 $1,683.53
71 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK S F $16.25 405 0 $0.00 415 $6,743.75
72 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
DESIGN B624 L F $35.65 8 0 $0.00 14 $499.10
73 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F $65.50 40 0 $0.00 48 $3,144.00
74 2021.601 RR LICENSE FEE LS $1,500.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $1,500.00
75 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL (SPECIAL) LS $30,000.00 1 0 $0.00 0.5 $15,000.00
Bid Totals: $1,107.00 $376,376.29
Project Category Totals
Category Amount This Voucher Amount To Date
A. Surface Improvements $1,107.00 $264,863.91
B. Storm Improvements $0.00 $75,819.00
C. Trail Improvements $0.00 $19,193.38
D. Railroad Crossing $0.00 $16,500.00
Arrowhead Drive Railroad
Crossing Improvements Final Pay Voucher 3
Page 6 of 6
Contract Change Item Status
CC CC
No.
Line
No. Item Description Units Unit Price Contract
Quantity
Quantity
This
Voucher
Amount This
Voucher
Quantity
To Date Amount To Date
Contract Change Totals: $$
Contract Change Totals
No. Contract
Change Description Amount This
Voucher
Amount To
Date
Material On Hand Additions
Line
No. Item Description Date Added Comments
Material On Hand Balance
Line
No. Item Description Date Added Used Remaining
Resolution No. 2020
December 15, 2020
Member ______ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES
FOR ELECTIONS HELD IN MEDINA IN 2021
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 204B.16, subd.1 requires the City Council, by ordinance
or resolution, to designate polling places by December 31 of each year for the upcoming year; and
WHEREAS, changes to the polling place locations may be made at least 90 days before
the next election if one or more of the authorized polling places becomes unavailable for use; and
WHEREAS, changes to the polling place locations may be made in the case of an
emergency when it is necessary to ensure a safe and secure location for voting; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that the city
of Medina designates the following polling places for elections conducted in the city in 2021:
Precinct 1A shall be: Medina City Hall
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340
Precinct 1B shall be: Hamel Community Building
3200 Mill Drive
Medina, MN 55340
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk is hereby authorized to designate a
replacement location meeting the requirements of the Minnesota Election Law for any polling
place designated in this Resolution that becomes unavailable for use by the City;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk is hereby authorized to designate an
emergency replacement polling place meeting the requirements of the Minnesota Election Law
for any polling place designated in this Resolution when necessary to ensure a safe and secure
location for voting;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk is directed to send a copy of this
resolution and any subsequent polling place designations to the Hennepin County Elections
Office.
Dated: December 15, 2020.
Agenda Item # 5D
Resolution No. 2020-
December 15, 2020
2
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
_____ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2020-XX 1
December 15, 2020
Member ________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION 2020-__
RESOLUTION GRANTING AN AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT FOR THE OUTDOOR LEARNING CENTER
LOCATED AT 4001 COUNTY ROAD 24
WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, organized and
existing under the laws of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Three Rivers Park District (the “Applicant”) is the fee owner of property
located at 4001 County Road 24 (the “Property”), which is legally described in Exhibit A, attached
hereto; and
WHEREAS, on February 16, 2010, the Medina City Council adopted Resolution No.
2010-13, granting the Applicant an amended conditional use permit (“CUP”) for an outdoor
educational facility consisting of a main lodge and eight log cabins with parking and a 768 square
foot office building; and
WHEREAS, the CUP in Resolution No. 2010-13 incorporated the terms of the original
CUP granted to the Applicant by Resolution No. 97-29; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested approval of an amendment to the conditional use
permit to allow construction of a 1,900 square foot shower and infirmary building with associated
trail and access; and
WHEREAS, the request was reviewed at the November 10, 2020 Planning Commission
meeting and held a duly noticed public hearing and recommended approval of the request subject
to certain terms and conditions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the application and the Planning Commission
recommendation at the December 1, 2020 City Council meeting; and
WHEREAS, following such review, the City Council found the proposed use is
consistent with the general criteria described for conditional uses in Section 825.39 of the City
Code.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Medina,
Minnesota that it hereby does approve the request by the Applicant for an amended conditional
use permit at the Property, subject to the following terms and conditions:
1. The Applicant shall maintain “No Parking” signs around the circular drive area and along other fire lanes in locations approved by the Fire Marshal.
Agenda Item # 5E
Resolution No. 2020-XX 2
December 15, 2020
2. The Applicant shall provide coordinated overflow parking at the maintenance shed,
located south of the office building, during larger events at the lodge.
3. Construction shall generally adhere to the plans provided.
4. The Applicant shall meet upland buffer requirements including signage and easement
documentation for the portion of the wetland immediately downgradient from the proposed
shower building/infirmary.
5. Roof mounted solar panels shall meet City zoning requirements at the time of permit
application.
6. All comments of the City Engineer shall be addressed.
7. The Applicant shall obtain required Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approvals.
8. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for
reviewing the proposed plans and other relevant documents.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Medina that Resolution
2010-13 is superseded by this resolution and hereby rescinded, the relevant and consistent terms
and conditions of the approval having been incorporated herein.
Dated
By:
_______________________________
Katheen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
By: ____________________________________
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _______
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2020-XX 3
December 15, 2020
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description of the Property
The Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 20, Township 118, Range 23,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Resolution No. 2020-
December 15, 2020
Member _____ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-
RECOGNIZING JEFF PEDERSON FOR YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE
CITY OF MEDINA AS A CITY COUNCIL MEMBER & PLANNING COMMISSIONER
WHEREAS, Jeff Pederson has dutifully completed thirteen years of dedicated service to
the City of Medina; and
WHEREAS, Pederson has served as a member of the City Council from 2011 through
2020; and
WHEREAS, Pederson has served as a member of the Medina Planning Commission
from 2006 through 2008; and
WHEREAS, throughout Councilmember Pederson’s service to the City of Medina
several significant projects have taken place including:
• Adopting the 2040 Comprehensive Plan;
• Land Use Development approvals including: Okalee Senior Living, The Wealshire,
Deer Hill Preserve, Just for Kix, three mini-storage buildings, AutoMotorPlex, Aldi,
Goddard School, 170 Westfalen multi-tenant, The Villas at Medina Country Club,
Woodland Hill Preserve, Medina Clydesdale Townhomes, Enclave at Medina,
Enclave at Brockton, Fields of Medina, and Reserve of Medina;
• Major road project completions including: Brockton Lane reconstruction, Hickory
Drive reconstruction, County Road 116/Highway 55 Quiet Zone Railroad Crossing,
Sioux Drive turn-lane improvements, and Tower Drive road reconstruction;
• Park projects including receiving Twins Grant funding for ball field safety
improvements at Hamel Legion Park, renovations to little league field, installation of
downcast LED lights, batting cages, score boards, and covered dugouts, numerous
Eagle Scout projects, land acquisition and construction of the new Park at Fields of
Medina, creation of park asset inventory, establishment of long-term park
replacement funding, and establishment of Robert G Mitchell Jr. Designated
Beneficiary Fund to help support Medina’s parks, trails, and wetlands;
• Public Safety projects including hiring Public Safety Director Jason Nelson, fire
service contract negotiations, and multiple fire services studies;
• Quad City agreement among Medina, Loretto, Independence and Greenfield for
Regional Service to the Metropolitan Council Sewer System;
• Purchasing and renovating the new Public Works/Police Facility at 600 Clydesdale
Trail, along with renovations to the lower level of City Hall;
• Hiring City Administrator Scott Johnson
• Implementing business initiatives such as the annual business forum and semi-
annual business tours.
Agenda Item # 7A
Resolution No. 2020-
December 15, 2020
2
WHEREAS, during Councilmember Pederson’s service to the City of Medina, the
combined residential and commercial construction added an estimated $383,200,959 of market
value to the City;
WHEREAS, Councilmember Pederson provided leadership and guidance to the City
while serving in various liaison capacities throughout his term including Acting Mayor, Planning
and Zoning Liaison, Public Safety Liaison, Public Works Liaison, and as the City representative
on the Highway 55 Coalition and Uptown Hamel Business Group; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Medina
acknowledges and thanks Councilmember Pederson for his years of dedicated service to the
community.
Dated: December 15, 2020.
_____________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
____________________________________
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _____
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2020-
December 15, 2020
Member _____ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-
RECOGNIZING JOHN ANDERSON FOR YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE
CITY OF MEDINA AS A CITY COUNCIL MEMBER & PLANNING COMMISSIONER
WHEREAS, John Anderson has dutifully completed eleven years of dedicated service to
the City of Medina; and
WHEREAS, Anderson has served as a member of the City Council from 2013 through
2020; and
WHEREAS, Anderson has served as a member of the Medina Planning Commission
from 2010 through 2012; and
WHEREAS, throughout Councilmember Anderson’s service to the City of Medina
several significant projects have taken place including:
• Adopting the 2040 Comprehensive Plan;
• Land Use Development approvals including: Okalee Senior Living, The Wealshire,
Deer Hill Preserve, Just for Kix, three mini-storage buildings, AutoMotorPlex, Aldi,
Goddard School, 170 Westfalen multi-tenant, The Villas at Medina Country Club,
Woodland Hill Preserve, Medina Clydesdale Townhomes, Enclave at Medina,
Enclave at Brockton, Fields of Medina, and Reserve of Medina;
• Major road project completions including: Brockton Lane reconstruction, Hickory
Drive reconstruction, County Road 116/Highway 55 Quiet Zone Railroad Crossing,
Sioux Drive turn-lane improvements, and Tower Drive road reconstruction;
• Park projects including receiving Twins Grant funding for ball field safety
improvements at Hamel Legion Park, renovations to little league field, installation of
downcast LED lights, batting cages, score boards, and covered dugouts, numerous
Eagle Scout projects, land acquisition and construction of the new Park at Fields of
Medina, creation of park asset inventory, establishment of long-term park
replacement funding, and establishment of Robert G Mitchell Jr. Designated
Beneficiary Fund to help support Medina’s parks, trails, and wetlands;
• Public Safety projects including hiring Public Safety Director Jason Nelson, fire
service contract negotiations, and multiple fire services studies;
• Quad City agreement among Medina, Loretto, Independence and Greenfield for
Regional Service to the Metropolitan Council Sewer System;
• Purchasing and renovating the new Public Works/Police Facility at 600 Clydesdale
Trail, along with renovations to the lower level of City Hall;
Agenda Item # 7B
Resolution No. 2020-
December 15, 2020
2
WHEREAS, during Councilmember Anderson’s service to the City of Medina, the
combined residential and commercial construction added an estimated $340,823,987 of market
value to the City;
WHEREAS, Councilmember Anderson provided leadership and guidance to the City
while serving in various liaison capacities throughout his term including Acting Mayor, Planning
and Zoning Liaison, Parks Liaison, Public Safety Liaison, and as the City representative on the
Northwest Hennepin League of Municipalities; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Medina
acknowledges and thanks Councilmember Anderson for his years of dedicated service to the
community.
Dated: December 15, 2020.
_____________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
____________________________________
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _____
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Mark Smith – Weston Woods Page 1 of 14 December 15, 2020
Prelim Plat/PUD General Plan City Council Meeting
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director; through City Administrator Scott Johnson
DATE: December 10, 2020
MEETING: December 15, 2020 City Council
SUBJ: Mark Smith (Mark of Excellence Homes) – Weston Woods
E. of Mohawk Dr., N. of Hwy 55 and 1952 Chippewa Road –
Preliminary Plat and PUD General Plan of Development
Review Deadline
Application Received: September 30, 2020
Review Deadline: January 28, 2021
Background
Mark Smith has requested Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) General Plan
approval for a proposed residential development of two properties north of Highway 55 and east
of Mohawk Drive.
The applicant proposes 150 homes and a public
park/natural area as described to the right:
The City granted conditional approval of a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment back in March
and reviewed a PUD Concept Plan over the winter of 2019-2020. The Comprehensive Plan
Amendment can be generally described as:
• Change of land use of 17 net acres of the southern property from Business to Low
Density Residential (2-3 units/net acre)
• Change of land use of 4.75 net acres of the southern property from Business to Medium
Density Residential (5-7 units/net acre)
• Change of land use for the preserved area of the southern property from Business to
public park and open space
• Change of Staging of the northern property (approximately 28 acres) to allow
development after 2020 instead of after 2025
An aerial of the site and surrounding property can be found in the middle of the following page.
The aerial shows existing land uses and describes planned land uses as follows:
• The northern property is 80 acres in area but is over ½ wetland, with approximately 28 net
acres after deducting wetland and required wetland buffer. Almost all the upland property is
tilled farmland. There is an existing home and farm buildings in the southwest corner of the
site.
• The southern property is 55 acres in size, with approximately 26.5 net acres after deducting
wetlands and required wetland buffers. A large wetland is located along the east end of the
site and drainageways divide the site into three areas (south, northwest, and northeast). In
• 76 twinhomes on the northern property
• Combination of uses on the southern property:
o 42 single-family lots
o 32 townhomes
o 5.1 acres park/open space.
Agenda Item # 8A
Mark Smith – Weston Woods Page 2 of 14 December 15, 2020
Prelim Plat/PUD General Plan City Council Meeting
addition, there are approximately 13 acres of woods which bisect the site along the ridge.
These woods abut the large wetland in the southern portion of the site and bisect the northern
portion of the site. There are two 4-acre farmed areas along Mohawk Drive and approximately
6.5 acres of vacant grassland on the northeast of the site.
• Polaris and The Wealshire are located to the west of the site. OSI is southeast of the large
wetland, along with additional future Business property to the north of OSI. The Bridgewater
neighborhood is located across the large wetland to the east of the site. Homes on rural lots are
located north and northwest of the site. These lots are zoned Rural-Residential-Urban Reserve,
but included in the Future Development Area designation and may be considered for addition
to the municipal sewer and water system in future Comprehensive Plan processes.
Proposed Changes from PUD Concept/Comp Plan Amendment Review
The Preliminary Plat/General Plan of Development includes the same number of proposed
homes as was shown upon the Concept Plan, which is attached for reference. Minutes from this
review are also attached for a reminder. The applicant proposes the following layout changes on
the southern property from what was reviewed earlier this year.
• One fewer townhome unit and one additional single-family detached home.
Mark Smith – Weston Woods Page 3 of 14 December 15, 2020
Prelim Plat/PUD General Plan City Council Meeting
• Change of location of the townhomes to the northwestern portion of the southern
property. During the review of the Concept Plan, the townhomes were shown in the
southwestern portion of the site.
• Change to the layout of the public park/natural area.
Swapping the location of the townhomes and single-family homes on the southern property does
not alter the land uses or density of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, but does require
adjusting the land use map to alter the location of the Low-Density Residential (LDR) and
Medium-Density Residential (MDR) aspects of the development. Because the Comprehensive
Plan Amendment is pending final adoption by the City, staff believes this can be accomplished
as part of the pending approval.
It should be noted that staff believes the City has the discretion, within the context of the
conditional Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval and through the PUD, whether the
proposed alteration of the location of the MDR and LDR is appropriate and should be approved.
Upon review, staff did not have concerns with the proposed change, but seeks Council direction
on the issue.
Comprehensive Plan
On April 7, the City Council adopted resolution 2020-18, granting conditional approval of
the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The approval was contingent upon final approval of
the Planned Unit Development and a development agreement related to the improvements
which are related to the development. These include the streets, utilities, trails, landscaping
and other improvements within the neighborhood and Chippewa Road through the subject
site.
This review assumes adoption of the Comp Plan Amendment which has been conditionally
approved. The site would be designated for development in or after 2020 with the uses
described to the
right:
One of the
conditions of the
Comprehensive
Plan Amendment was that the overall density of the southern property be between 3.0-3.5/net
acre. The proposed plan shows a density of 3.5 units/net acre on the southern property.
Environmental Assessment Worksheet
In September 2020, the City completed an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW),
which was required because of the wetland impacts necessary for construction of Chippewa
Road. The purpose of an EAW is to summarize and seek input on the potential
environmental impacts of the project, provide information for planning and design especially
related to ways to mitigate potential impacts, and determine if the project will cause any
significant environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated through normal review processes
such that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should be required.
Land Use Net Acres Density
Northern parcel LDR 28 acres 2-3 units/net acre
Southern parcel (portion) LDR 17 acres 2-3 units/net acre
Southern parcel (portion) MDR 4.7 acres 5-7 units/net acre
Southern parcel (portion PROSE 5.2 acres NA
Mark Smith – Weston Woods Page 4 of 14 December 15, 2020
Prelim Plat/PUD General Plan City Council Meeting
The City Council reviewed the EAW on November 17, 2020. Following review, the Council
approved responses to comments received and adopted a resolution determining that an EIS
should not be required.
Planned Unit Development General Plan of Development
The applicant has requested a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to regulate development and
construction. According to Section 827.25, PUD provisions are established to provide
comprehensive procedures and standards designed to allow greater flexibility in the development
of neighborhoods and/or nonresidential areas by incorporating design modifications and allowing
for a mixture of uses. The PUD process, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this
Code related to setbacks, lot area, width and depth, yards, and other development standards is
intended to encourage:
1. Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic
expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design, and placement of structures and by the
conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments.
2. Higher standards of site and building design.
3. The preservation, enhancement, or restoration of desirable site characteristics such as high quality
natural resources, wooded areas, wetlands, natural topography and geologic features and the
prevention of soil erosion.
4. Innovative approaches to stormwater management and low-impact development practices which
result in volume control and improvement to water quality beyond the standard requirements of
the City.
5. Maintenance of open space in portions of the development site, preferably linked to surrounding
open space areas, and also enhanced buffering from adjacent roadways and lower intensity uses.
6. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly
development and use pattern and more convenience in location and design of development and
service facilities.
7. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lower
development costs and public investments.
8. A development pattern that effectuates the objectives of the Medina Comprehensive Plan. (PUD is
not intended as a means to vary applicable planning and zoning principles.)
9. A more desirable and creative environment than might be possible through the strict application on
zoning and subdivision regulations of the City.
The City has a good deal of discretion when determining whether a PUD should be implemented
rather than standard zoning. The City should consider the purpose above when making a
decision whether a PUD is preferred to standard zoning. The applicant has described how they
believe the PUD addresses the criteria on pages 4-8 of their narrative.
Proposed Site Layout
On the southern property, the applicant proposes 42 single-family lots between 9,000-12,000
square feet in size, 32 townhomes and 5.1 net acres for public parks and open space.
As noted above, a PUD allows “deviation from the strict provisions of this Code related to
setbacks, lot area, width and depth, yards, and other development standards” to serve the
purposes described in the PUD ordinance. To analyze whether to approve a rezoning to PUD,
the City compares the request to the expectations of the underlying zoning designation.
Mark Smith – Weston Woods Page 5 of 14 December 15, 2020
Prelim Plat/PUD General Plan City Council Meeting
Single-Family Lots
The R1 zoning district is generally utilized by the City to implement the LDR land use. The R2
zoning district is available “as an alternative to the R1 district, not to substantially increase
density of development, but rather to allow the clustering of smaller lots to support:
(1) The protection and enhancement of natural areas through the preservation of wooded
areas, the provision of additional buffering for lakes, streams, and wetlands, or the
creation of ecological connections with other protected lands.
(2) The preservation of open spaces, provision of additional buffering from adjacent streets
and uses, or the creation of additional recreational opportunities.
The City Council, following review and recommendation by the Planning Commission, shall
have full discretion to determine in what cases zoning property R2 rather than the standard R1
district meets these purposes. If the City Council determines an R2 zoning does not meet these
purposes, the property shall be zoned R1.”
The following summarizes the single family lots proposed on the southern property compared to
the R1 and R2 district requirements. The proposed lots in the PUD fall in between the R1 and
R2 standards, which could be formalized through the flexibility of a PUD.
R1 R2 Proposed
Single Family
Minimum Lot Size 11,000 s.f. 8,000 s.f. 9,000 s.f.
Minimum Lot Width 90 feet 60 feet 70 feet
Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 90 feet 130 feet
Front Yard Setback 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet
Front Yard Setback (garage) 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet
Side Yard Setback (combined) 25 feet (15 & 10) 15 feet (10 & 5) 20 feet (10 & 10)
Side Yard (corner) 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet
Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet
Collector Road Setback 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet
Max. Hardcover 40% 50% 40%
Townhomes
The R3 zoning district is utilized by the City to implement the MDR land use, which is the
proposed land use for the townhome portion of this project. The R3 district permits townhome
development up to 7 units/acre, provided design elements such as oversized garages, community
amenities affordable housing or low impact development are provided. Because common
elements, especially stormwater ponds, are shared between the townhomes and the single-family
lots within the broader Planned Unit Development, staff believes the overall density of the
project and the number of units is more relevant than determination of the exact density of the
townhome portion of the site. However, it appears that if one includes approximately ½ of the
area shared stormwater pond in the townhome calculation, the density is approximately 6.3
units/acre.
In addition to allowing the blending of the density between the townhomes and single-family, the
applicant requests flexibility through the PUD process to reduces the setback between townhome
buildings, the minimum distance from the townhome buildings to the private roadway, and the
Mark Smith – Weston Woods Page 6 of 14 December 15, 2020
Prelim Plat/PUD General Plan City Council Meeting
minimum setback to a collector roadway (Chippewa Road). The requested deviations requested
as part of the PUD are highlighted below:
R3 Requirement Proposed
Townhomes
Minimum Net Area per Unit 6,222 s.f. 6,222 s.f.
Maximum Net Area per Unit 12,500 s.f. 6,222 s.f.
Minimum Setback from Perimeter 20 feet 45 feet
Front Yard Setback 25 feet 45 feet
Collector Road Setback (Chippewa) 50 feet 40 feet
Local Road Setback (Mohawk) 40 feet 40 feet
Private Road Setback 25 feet (generally min. 27 feet to
curb, based on boulevard width)
23 feet to curb
Min Distance Between Buildings 30 feet 25 feet
Max. Hardcover 50% 31%
Twinhome Lots
On the northern property, the applicant proposes 76 twinhome units within 38 buildings. The
applicant’s concept shows small lots under the twinhomes with Association owned open space
between each pad and between the street and the building. For the sake of comparison to lot
standards, staff has calculated the open space between the lots as part of the adjacent lots. As
noted above, the R2 zoning district can be used to implement the LDR land use in certain
circumstances. Staff believes that the northern property may likely be a reasonable use of the R2
district because of the narrow areas of upland amongst the wetland on the site. The following
table summarizes the twinhome layout compared to the R2 district. The layout would seek
flexibility to reduce the front setback to the private roadway as part of the PUD request.
R2 Proposed
Twinhomes
Minimum Lot Size (Two-family) 5,000 s.f.
per unit
>5,000 s.f. including open space between
lots
Minimum Lot Width (two-family) 50 feet 50 feet
Minimum Lot Depth 90 feet 90 feet
Front Yard Setback 25 feet 25’ to curb (equiv. to 13’ to right-of-way)
Front Yard Setback (garage) 30 feet 25’ to curb (equiv. to 13’ to right-of-way)
Side Yard Setback (two-family) 10 feet 30 feet between buildings
Side Yard (corner) 25 feet 25 feet
Rear Yard Setback 25 feet 30 feet
Max. Hardcover 50% 66.4% of platted lot; 50% if including
boulevard and open space between buildings
Generally, the flexibility sought under the PUD allows for structures to be placed closer together
within the site than would be allowed by the underlying zoning districts. Doing so allows the
same number of units to occupy a smaller footprint, which makes it more practical to preserve
some of the natural area and while still provided similar open space on the periphery of the site.
Mark Smith – Weston Woods Page 7 of 14 December 15, 2020
Prelim Plat/PUD General Plan City Council Meeting
Architectural Design
The R3 zoning district includes minimum architectural requirements for townhome construction.
The R2 district does not provide specific architectural requirements with the exception of
requiring elements if a garage occupies more than half of a building façade.
The R3 zoning district requires the following standards for townhomes:’
• Minimum of 20% accent materials on façade facing streets
• Modulation minimum of once per 50 feet of façade
• Additional architectural features if garage doors occupy more than half of façade
The applicant has provided the attached narrative of proposed architectural features and example
sketches and photos.
A higher level of architectural requirements can be required as part of the consideration for the
PUD. Staff seeks feedback from the Council on whether the additional standards proposed by
the applicant in their narrative is sufficient.
Tree Preservation, Buffer Yards, and Landscaping
The southern site includes a wooded area approximately 14 acres in area. The northern 3-acres
of the woods is designated as a moderate quality oak forest in the City’s land cover classification
system. Approximately 1-2 acres of the southern wooded area is designated as a moderate
quality maple-basswood forest. The remaining area is an altered deciduous woodland.
Few trees are located on the northern site.
The applicant’s concept proposes to preserve approximately 7 acres and dedicate the land to the
City as part of the PUD process and park dedication requirements. The applicant proposes to
preserve an additional ½ acre of wooded area in the eastern portion of the site.
The City’s natural resource specialist provided observations on the woodlands. His conclusion
was that the southern portion of the wooded area, especially located on the knoll which is
proposed to be dedicated to the City, was well varied in terms of tree age and species, and had
comparatively low levels of buckthorn intrusion. This portion of the woods appeared to be a
long-term sustainable natural area of a comparatively good quality within Medina. The
dedication of the property to the City would provide the opportunity to conserve the highest
quality portion of the woodlands. Although the northern portion of this woodland is classified as
a moderate quality oak forest, the City’s natural resource specialist noted that oak regrowth was
very limited and the area was transitioning to be ash dominant and was also heavily infested with
buckthorn.
Even though approximately ½ of the wooded area is proposed to be preserved, significant tree
removal on the rest of the site is subject to the City’s tree preservation ordinance, which requires
replacement for all removal in excess of 15% of the significant trees on the site. This results in
the need to replace 355 trees, or a total of 3372 inches of trees. The applicant proposes to
replace as many trees as possible on-site, including restoring the area east of the twinhomes on
the northern property. The tree preservation ordinance does provide provisions for reducing
replacement for pioneering trees such as boxelders provided it is in connection with a natural
Mark Smith – Weston Woods Page 8 of 14 December 15, 2020
Prelim Plat/PUD General Plan City Council Meeting
resource management plan. This reduction will be considered at the time of final plat. Even if
the replacement is reduced and larger replacement trees are planted, the replacement will not be
able to occur fully on-site. The City accepts a fee of $100/inch to the City’s reforestation/forest
management fund for trees that cannot be replaced on-site.
To provide replacement for trees proposed to be removed, the applicant proposes to plant trees
averaging 40 feet on center or as densely as is practical for long-term survivability. The result is
that the plantings on site will far exceed the minimum requirements and would be as much as can
be accommodated.
Wetlands and Floodplain
The City requires upland buffers to be established upon development based upon the
management classification of the wetland. Portions of the large wetland to the east of the
proposed development is a Preserve wetland which is mapped as a Site of Biodiversity
Significance. This type of wetland requires an average buffer of 50 feet in width. The remaining
wetlands require buffers with an average width of 25-35 feet. It appears that the average buffers
are provided, but staff recommends a condition requiring the applicant to provide documentation
to confirm.
FEMA maps identified a Zone A floodplain within the location of the large wetland. The City
has provided a model for a Base Flood Elevation, which is currently being reviewed by Elm
Creek Watershed. The residential development does not appear to contain floodplain impacts,
but the construction of Chippewa Road will. The applicant has agreed to provide compensatory
storage upon the site to mitigate the impacts of Chippewa Road.
Transportation
The applicant proposes a single access to the twinhome neighborhood off Mohawk Drive, across
from the driveway of The Wealshire. The single-family area is proposed to have two accesses,
one on Mohawk Drive and one on new Chippewa Road. The applicant originally proposed two
access points for the townhome area, one across from Polaris’s driveway on Mohawk Drive, and
a second access to new Chippewa Road. The proposed location of the access to Chippewa Road
was too close to Mohawk Drive and the City Engineer recommended that it be shifted to the east.
The attached plans show the original location. Rather than reorienting the site to shift the
location, the applicant has proposed to remove the second access point. A trail is proposed
which could be utilized as a secondary emergency access in this approximate location. While
inconvenient for circulation, the City Engineer has indicated that the single access point would
not be problematic for traffic. Staff recommends a condition that the trail connection be
constructed adequately as a secondary emergency access if requested by Public Safety. An
exhibit showing the adjusted intersection alignment is attached.
The applicant has proposed to construct the Chippewa Road extension from Mohawk Drive to
Arrowhead Drive as part of development of the property. This connection is identified in the
City’s Transportation Plan and was necessitated at this time because of the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment.
Construction of Chippewa Road is imperative because Mohawk Drive has limited right-in/right-
out access to the south of the site. As a result, eastbound traffic would currently be required to
Mark Smith – Weston Woods Page 9 of 14 December 15, 2020
Prelim Plat/PUD General Plan City Council Meeting
travel west on Chippewa Road to Willow Drive in order to turn left onto Highway 55. This
would add approximately 1.3 miles to each east-bound trip. Staff believes this connection is
important to support development of the subject site and others in the area of Chippewa
Road/Mohawk Drive. This connection is important for public safety purposes as well, providing
better emergency access to the area and also providing an alternative route in case of an
emergency on Highway 55.
As described in the EAW, construction of Chippewa Road will result in significant impacts to
the large wetland east of the site. The City will be responsible for wetland mitigation for the
project, although the applicant has indicated that they would contribute toward the cost of
mitigation rather than being responsible for the full cost of watermain construction from
Arrowhead to Mohawk (see discussion below under sewer/water).
The City Engineer has provided several comments related to the design of Chippewa Road. Staff
recommends a condition that these comments be addressed. The applicant has agreed to oversize
stormwater improvements within the development to offset required treatment for the eastern
portion of Chippewa Road as much as possible. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant
update plans upon Final Plat if it is determined that additional stormwater treatment can
practically be provided within the development.
Sewer/Water/Easements
Existing sewer and water mains are located within Mohawk Drive, which the applicant proposes
to extend throughout the site.
Currently, the subject property and other sites in the area are served by a single water main along
Highway 55 (to Mohawk) without any looping. As part of the consideration for the Comp Plan
Amendment and PUD, the applicant has agreed to extend a second watermain from Arrowhead
Drive to the site, which would relieve the City of the obligation of doing so.
The applicant has stated that they would, at the City’s option, contribute towards the cost of
wetland mitigation for the construction of Chippewa Road rather than being responsible for the
full cost of the watermain. This could be implemented through water connection credits for the
homes in the subdivision and may be a good opportunity for the City, because the watermain had
initially been an anticipated cost.
Staff recommends a condition that the plat provide drainage and utility easements around the
perimeter of lots and over all utilities, stormwater improvements, drainageways, emergency
overflows and wetland locations.
Stormwater
The applicant proposes several stormwater improvements throughout the site. Volume control is
proposed to be provided primarily through stormwater reuse for lawn irrigation. The City
Engineer and Elm Creek Watershed have provided initial review comments, and staff
recommends a condition that these comments be addressed.
Mark Smith – Weston Woods Page 10 of 14 December 15, 2020
Prelim Plat/PUD General Plan City Council Meeting
Parks, Trails, and Open Space
City’s subdivision regulations allow the City to require one of the following options for park
dedication:
• Up to 10% of the buildable property – in this case approximately 7.1 acres
• Cash in-lieu equal to 8% of the pre-developed market value (min $3500/max $8000 per
home) - in this case estimated to be at the low end, $525,000
• Combination of the above
The applicant proposes the following dedication and improvements related to parks, trails, and
open space:
• Dedicate 7 acres of preserved woodland to the City.
• Construction of public trail loop through the preserved woodland.
• Construction of public trail along Chippewa Road from Mohawk Drive to Arrowhead Drive.
• Construction of trail along Mohawk Drive from “Hillside Lane” to Chippewa Road.
• Construction of private trails through the twinhomes and townhomes to connect to the
preserved woodland.
The City’s Parks and Trails plan is attached for reference. It identifies the following
improvements in the vicinity:
• Active Park Search Area
• Trail along new Chippewa Road
• Trail from Chippewa Road through northern property to Mohawk Drive
The Park Commission discussed a year ago and recommended at that time that an active park
should not be required within this site, and that the City should seek opportunities on other
nearby properties.
The dedication of the preserved woods to the City accounts for the park dedication requirements
of the subdivision. In addition to the dedication, the applicant has proposed additional trail
improvements as amenities related to obtaining the maximum density for the townhome
development and in connection with the PUD and Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
The applicant proposes to construct the trail along Chippewa Road as shown in the plan. The
applicant also proposes to construct a trail within the woods being preserved. The location of
these trails is shown with solid green lines on the aerial at the bottom of the following page.
The applicant originally proposed a trail connection along the east side of Mohawk Drive, south
of Chippewa Road to their southern entrance. This location is shown as a solid purple line.
Staff believes this trail connection should not be constructed, but rather a connection north of
Chippewa Road, consistent with the Trail Plan. This northern option is identified with a dashed
green line.
The applicant has proposed a trail connection from Chippewa Road, through the townhome
neighborhood, to connect to the wooded area. This location is shown with a dashed bright blue
line. The applicant originally proposed this connection to be private, for the residents of the
Mark Smith – Weston Woods Page 11 of 14 December 15, 2020
Prelim Plat/PUD General Plan City Council Meeting
area. The Park Commission recommended that this connection should be a public trail,
providing improved access from the Chippewa Road trail to the park.
As an alternative, there is a sidewalk connection along the public street in the project, which is
shown with a dashed purple line. The City could rely on this sidewalk to access the park, or
could require a trail to be constructed along this stretch rather than sidewalk.
Park Commission Recommendation
The Park Commission reviewed the application at their November meeting. An excerpt from the
draft meeting minutes is attached for reference.
Staff recommends the following park and trail dedications and improvements:
1) Dedication of the preserved wooded area to the City
2) Construction of trail adjacent to Chippewa Road (solid green)
3) Construction of the trail within the park (solid green)
4) Construction of the “northern option” connecting Chippewa Road and Mohawk Drive
(dashed green)
5) Construction of public trail connecting Chippewa Road to the park through the townhome
neighborhood (bright blue).
As noted above, the
Park Commission
recommended that
the connection
through the
townhomes should
be a public trail.
This would
guarantee access for
the general public,
but would require
that the City be
responsible for the
ultimate
maintenance and
replacement of this
trail.
The Park
Commission also
recommended
extensive signage or
other means to
delineate the edge of
the preserved
woodland area.
Mark Smith – Weston Woods Page 12 of 14 December 15, 2020
Prelim Plat/PUD General Plan City Council Meeting
Review Criteria
The City has a good deal of discretion when reviewing a PUD because it is a rezoning, which is a
legislative action. A PUD should only be approved if it achieves the purposes of the PUD
district (described on page 4), the Comprehensive Plan, and other City policies.
The City generally has a lower level of discretion on review of the preliminary plat, but in this
case the plat is contingent upon approval of the PUD. If the PUD is approved, review of the
preliminary plat is guided by Subd. 10 of Section 820.21:
In the case of all subdivisions, the City shall deny approval of a preliminary or final
plat if one or a combination of the following findings are made:
(a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the
city, or that the proposed subdivision is premature, as defined in Section 820.28.
(b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography,
vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are
such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated.
(c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does
not meet minimum lot size standards.
(d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause
substantial environmental damage.
(e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious
public health problems.
(f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public
or private streets, easements or right-of-way.
Public Comments
Staff has received two comments from nearby residents, which are attached for reference. The
residents generally speak in support of the proposal.
Planning Commission Recommendation
Staff believes the use of the PUD provides a better means to address the objectives of the City as
stated in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment which was conditionally approved earlier this
year, as well as the other purposes described in the PUD ordinance.
Based upon the density approved in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, providing for a
reduced footprint for the lots and townhome allows for open space and natural resources to be
preserved around the remainder of the site.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the November 10 meeting. An excerpt from
the meeting minutes is attached for reference. A resident who had provided written comment
also spoke at the hearing in support of the project. The Planning Commission indicated that the
proposal appeared to meet the objectives of the PUD and were generally supportive of the
project. Following review, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of
the PUD General Plan of Development and Preliminary Plat, subject to the following conditions:
1) Approval of the PUD General Plan of Development and Preliminary Plat is contingent upon
adoption of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
2) Approval is conditioned upon approval of a wetland replacement plan for proposed wetland
impacts
Mark Smith – Weston Woods Page 13 of 14 December 15, 2020
Prelim Plat/PUD General Plan City Council Meeting
3) Approval is conditioned upon establishment of a base flood elevation.
4) The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include
the conditions described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy.
5) The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated 10/27/2020 except as
may be modified herein. Final plans shall be provided at the time of final plat and shall
address the comments of the City Engineer, Fire Marshal, Elm Creek Watershed, other
relevant staff and agencies and the conditions noted herein. Plans shall be subject to review
and approval by the City Engineer.
6) A site plan review of each townhome building within the development site shall not be
required as described in Section 825.55 of City Code. However, each townhome building
and single-family dwelling shall be subject to administrative review by City staff for
consistency with the site plan which accompanies the plat, architectural requirements
established in the PUD, relevant requirements of City Code, and the conditions noted herein.
7) The Applicant shall meet all requirements of the wetland protection ordinance upon the
residential development site, including provision of easements, planting of vegetation and
installation of signage.
8) The plat shall include private roads within separate outlots from surrounding common areas.
9) The plat shall provide drainage and utility easements over all utilities, stormwater
improvements, wetlands, and drainageways as recommended by the City Engineer. The plat
shall also provide easements along the perimeter of the lots and between buildings as
recommended by the City Engineer.
10) Plans shall be updated to either relocate the access point from Chippewa Road to the
townhome area further east, or to remove the access point. If the access point is removed,
the trail connection between Chippewa Road and the townhome area shall be designed and
constructed as a secondary emergency access if determined necessary by Public Safety. The
specifications shall be reviewed and approved by City staff.
11) The Applicant shall update plans to provide additional stormwater management if the City
determines that additional treatment can be provided within the development to offset
treatment for the eastern portion of Chippewa Road.
12) The Property shall be subject to the City’s lawn and landscaping irrigation regulations. No
lawn or landscape irrigation systems shall be permitted to be connected to the City water
system. The Applicant shall provide a description of any proposed irrigation system at the
time of final plat application.
13) The Applicant shall provide documentation to show that the average buffers required for
each wetland have been provided.
14) The Applicant shall update plans for Chippewa Road as directed by the City Engineer.
15) The Applicant shall provide 3372 inches of replacement trees, unless the City determines a
reduction is appropriate based upon implementation of a natural resource management plan
for the removal of pioneering trees such as boxelders. Replacement beyond that which can
be located on-site shall be provided as $100/inch cash towards the City’s reforestation/forest
management fund.
16) The design of the townhome roadway shall be updated as necessary to improve emergency
vehicle circulation.
17) Plans shall be updated to improve trail and pedestrian alignment as recommended by staff.
18) The Applicant shall deed the preserved wooded area to the City. Plans shall be updated to
include signage or other means to clearly delineate the preserved areas from private lots.
Mark Smith – Weston Woods Page 14 of 14 December 15, 2020
Prelim Plat/PUD General Plan City Council Meeting
19) The Applicant shall construct the following paved trails and provide easements over the
locations as recommended by City staff:
a. Adjacent to Chippewa Road
b. Within the park
c. Near Mohawk Drive, connecting Chippewa Road to the northwest corner of the site
d. Connecting Chippewa Road to the park through the townhome neighborhood
20) The street and watermain connection between Mohawk Drive and Arrowhead Drive shall be
constructed in connection with the development.
21) The Applicant shall submit HOA documents for City review and approval which shall
describe provisions for maintenance of elements such as the private streets, trails,
stormwater improvements, lawn irrigation, upland buffers, and bufferyard landscaping.
22) The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site
improvements to ensure completion.
23) The request shall be subject to review and approval of Elm Creek Watershed, Minnesota
Department of Transportation, Minnesota Department of Health, Pollution Control Agency,
Metropolitan Council and any other relevant agencies.
24) The Applicant shall provide title documentation at the time of final plat application and
abide by the recommendation of the City Attorney with regard to title matters and recording
instructions.
25) The final plat applicant shall be filed within 180 days of the date of the resolution granting
preliminary approval or the approval shall be considered void, unless a written request for
time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council.
26) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for
the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, construction plans, and other relevant documents.
Potential Actions
1. Move to direct staff to resubmit the Comprehensive Plan Amendment with the updated
land use configuration of the southern property to the Metropolitan Council for review.
2. Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution granting PUD General Plan and Preliminary
Plat approval subject to the conditions noted in the staff report.
Attachments
1. Document List
2. Concept Plan reviewed in fall/winter 2019-2020
3. Excerpt from 3/17/2020 City Council minutes
4. Excerpt from 11/10/2020 Planning Commission minutes
5. Excerpt from 11/18/2020 Park Commission minutes
6. Natural Resource Specialist comments dated 10/21/2019
7. Engineering Comments
8. Public Comment received
9. Applicant Narrative
10. Architectural Description
11. Twinhome Photos
12. Adjusted townhome access exhibit
13. Plans
14. Park and Trail plan
12/10/2020
Project: LR-20-280– Weston Woods
The following documents are all part of the official record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are
only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall.
Documents Submitted by Applicant
Document Received Document
Date
Pages Electronic Paper
Copy?
Notes
Application 9/30/2020 9/30/2020 3 Yes Yes
Deposit 9/30/2020 9/29/2020 1 Yes Yes $21,000
Narrative 9/30/2020 9/30/2020 8 Yes Yes
Narrative-Updated 11/6/2020 11/6/2020 8 Yes Yes
Plans 9/30/2020 9/28/2020 34 Yes Yes
Plans-Updated 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 36 Yes Yes Civil Only
Plans-Updated 11/12/2020
Plans-Updated 12/4/2020
Stormwater Plan 9/30/2020 9/29/2020 805 Yes Yes
Stormwater Plan-Updated 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 692 Yes Yes
Stormwater Plan – Updated 12/4/2020 12/3/2020
Floodplain Info 9/30/2020 6/24/2020 8 Yes Yes
Geotechnical Information 9/30/2020 9/22/2020 16 Yes Yes
Geotech information 12/4/2020 54 Yes Yes
Architectural Narrative 11/6/2020 NA 1 Yes
Photos 11/6/202 NA 2 Yes
Eng Response 10/27/2020 10 Yes
Eng Response 12/4/2020 3 Yes Yes
Townhome Access Exhibit 12/8/2020 12/8/2020 1 Yes
Eastern Chippewa Pond Exhibit 12/8/2020 12/8/2020 1 Yes
Updated Tree Calculation 12/9/2020 12/4/2020 Yes
<OVER>
12/10/2020
Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies
Document Document
Date
# of
pages
Electronic Notes
Engineer Comments 10/14/2020 7 Y
Engineer Comments 11/5/2020 8 Y
Engineer Comments 11/19/2020 8 Y
Legal Comments 10/13/2020 2 Y
Elm Creek 11/1/2020 12 Y
MnDOT 10/28/2020 3 Y
Notice 10/30/2020 13 Y 18 pages w/ affidavit
Planning Commission Report 11/6/2020 12 Y
Park Commission Report 11/13/2020 9 Y
City Council Report 12/10/2020 14 Y
Public Comments
Document Date Electronic Notes
Mackey 11/5/2020
Heintz 11/9/2020
0+0
0
1+0
0
0+001+002+002+51.15
CH
I
P
P
E
W
A
R
O
A
D
PO
L
A
R
I
S
RO
A
D
CONNECTION DR.
S
H
O
R
T
W
A
Y
R
D
.
MOHAWK ROADMOHAWK ROAD
SITE DATA
SITE DATA - ROY PARCEL 80.09 Ac.
Site Area:75.42 Ac.
( Less Chippewa, Mohawk, Hackamore R/W )
Existing Wetland & Buffer Area:47.33 Ac.
Net Developable Area:28.09 Ac.
( 75.42 - 47.33 )
Twin Home Residential:76 Units
( Lots and Local Roads, Private Roads @ 29' B-B )
Setbacks:
25' front from curb
30' from county road
30' min. between building
15' structure setback from wetland buffer
Overall Net Density: 2.7 u/a
( 76 units / 28.09 ac.)
SITE DATA - CAVANAUGH PARCEL 54.91 Ac.
Gross Site Area:52.99 Ac.
(Less Chippewa, Mohawk R/W )
Existing Wetland & Buffer Area:26.42 Ac.
Park / Openspace: 5.47 Ac.
(10% Required Park Dedication = 5.47 ac.(28.09 + [52.99 - 26.42] = 54.66 x 0.10 )
Net Residential Developable Area:21.10 Ac.
(Lots and Local Roads, Private Roads @ 29' B-B )
Overall Residential Units:74 Units
Single Family Lots 70' x 130' +/-41 lots
Row Townhome Units 33 lots
Setbacks:
30' front / rear
35' from county road
10' side
15' structure setback from wetland buffer
Single Family Density: 2.5 u/a
(41 units / 16.39 ac.)
Row Townhome Density: 7.0 u/a
(33 units / 4.71 ac.)
Overall Net Density: 3.5 u/a
(74 units / 21.10 ac.)
SITE DATA - BOTH PARCELS
Net Residential developable Area:49.19 Ac.
(Less Chippewa,Monarch,Hackamore R/W )
Overall Net Residential Density: 3.0 u/a
(150 units / 49.19 ac.)
* All areas are approximate. Developable area estimated from County GIS Data as
measured from local codes.
Wetlands were delineated by Kjolhaug Environmental and field located by Landform Professional Services.
Landform and Site to Finish are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.R R
in collaboration with:
MARK SMITH ROY & CAVANAUGH SITES ∂ Medina, MN
Concept Planning∂ 09.30.2019
CONCEPT PLAN G
NORTH
0 150 300
Concept G combined sites.dwg
Medina City Council Excerpt from 3/17/2020 Meeting Minutes
1
Mark Smith (Mark of Excellence Homes) – Weston Woods – Comprehensive Plan
Amendment and PUD Concept Plan Review – East of Mohawk Drive, North of HWY
55 and 1952 Chippewa Road (7:26 p.m.)
Finke stated that the Council previously reviewed this request at the November 6, 2019 meeting
and tabled the request to allow for a neighborhood meeting that took place on January 20th. He
explained that the Comprehensive Plan amendment would change the staging of the northern
parcel from 2025 to 2020 and would change the use of the southern parcel from business
development to a mix of residential development and dedicated park property. He provided an
update on the neighborhood meeting, stating that approximately 50 to 60 residents, mostly from
the Bridgewater neighborhood, attended. He stated that most of the comments opposed the
request, specifically the change in staging, while one comment supported the request as it
would allow for the more imminent completion of Chippewa Road. He state d that there was not
a lot of discussion related to the change in land use on the southern property but more focused
on the timing of the project and additional traffic that would be brought to the area. He stated
that there is also a PUD concept plan for comment but noted that the PUD would be contingent
upon the Comprehensive Plan amendments. He stated that the vision and goals of the
Comprehensive Plan should be considered as guides for the request. He explained that the
purpose of staging is to ensure development of infrastructure that could support the
development. He commented on the limited access of Mohawk Drive at Highway 55 and the
need for an extension of a watermain. He stated that the Comprehensive Plan also includes
language related to population growth and the desire to slow that growth. He review ed the
objectives as they would apply to the southern parcel, noting that both parcels are within the
MUSA. He stated that the applicant provided a narrative which includes the public benefits of
the two parcels developing as one parcel rather than two separate developments under two
different land uses and time frames. He reviewed those benefits including dedication of the
highest value natural resource area, that exceeds the minimum park dedication requirements, to
the City, the full construction cost of Chippewa Road from Mohawk to Arrowhead along with
floodplain mitigation costs and stormwater management areas, and construction of the
watermain. He stated that it would be difficult to project the costs for the infrastructure
improvements in the future. He noted that, while it would be likely that the City would receive
some contributions from adjacent landowners, there would still be a City contribution to those
projects if completed in the future and not in conjunction with this proposed development. He
stated that a Comprehensive Plan amendment provides the City with the highest level of
discretion. He advised that a number of public comments received were included in the packet,
along with comments from other jurisdictions. He reported that the Planning Commission held a
publ ic hearing in fall of 2019 and recommended on a vote of 4-2 to recommend denial. He
stated that the minutes from that meeting were included in the packet as well.
Pederson stated that it might be interesting for the Council to hear about the staging and the
potential to jump ahead if this were not approved.
Finke stated that there is flexibility to the staging plan, provided through the Comprehensive
Plan, which would allow the parcel to develop up to two years prior to the staging time, which
would equate to 2023. He explained that the flexibility is linked to a point system in the Code.
Anderson referenced the comments from financing and administration, noting that WSB has
provided estimates of over $6,000,000 to complete Chippewa Road. He stated that the
applicant is offering to pay for the majority of those expenses with the exception of the $600,000
expense for wetland mitigation. He stated that an outline of public benefits from the applicant
was provided in the packet and identifi es a cost of $2,500,000 and $3,400,000 plus right-of-way
Medina City Council Excerpt from 3/17/2020 Meeting Minutes
2
for the construction of the roadway. He asked if the City would be responsible for that gap
between the projected costs.
Finke explained that the difference in most of the numbers is trying to project difference
scenarios. He stated that if the project moves forward the applicant would fund the construction
of Chippewa Road, along with the adjacent trail, and noted that the outstanding amount would
be wetland mitigation and would have an estimated cost of $600,000. He stated that the
difference in cost between the engineer’s estimate and applicant’s estimate is that the
engineer’s estimate does not include efficiencies that might be provided by completing the road
project in conjunction with adjacent development. He explained that materials from the
adjoining sites could be used for the road projects, along with other cost savings elements
outside of hard construction costs. He explained that if the project is approved as proposed, the
wetland mitigation would be the outstanding amount contributed by the City. He stated that the
applicant could contribute towards the wetland mitigation in return for water connection fee
credits, if desired by the City.
Anderson stated that it sounds like the developer could construct the road for about half of the
cost of the City.
Stremel confirmed that it would cost the City more to construct the road as a public project.
Anderson asked if staff anticipates any additional City costs associated with the construction of
Chippewa Road, outside of the $600,000 for wetland mitigation costs.
Finke stated that he did not anticipate any additional City costs. He noted that there would be
costs for permitting and such, which are comparatively small amounts.
Martin asked if staff is comfortable that whatever is proposed by the developer would yield a
completed road and watermain at no cost to the City, outside of the wetland mitigation cost
estimated at $600,000.
Stremel stated that he believes the preliminary plans to be complete and would include the
items discussed. He stated that staff would be involved during the process of plan development
and construction to ensure that City requirements are being met.
DesLauriers stated that he appreciated the clarification that the developer could construct the
road at about half the cost of the City. He asked if the City would still anticipate the same
contributions from the developer if the project is not allowed to move ahead in staging to 2020
and instead jumps ahead to 2023.
Finke stated that the staging plan flexibility does not require a Comprehensive Plan amendment
but would still be a PUD that also has a high level of discretion. He stated that the PUD and
jump ahead would only link to the northern parcel and therefore the necessary land may not be
secured from both parcels as the parcels may not develop at the same time. He stated that a
lack of right-of-way co uld prevent a public project from moving ahead.
Albers asked the net change between this proposal and the proposal reviewed by the Council in
November of 2019. He asked if the only change was the developer holding the public meeting
and agreeing to fund the construction of the road.
Medina City Council Excerpt from 3/17/2020 Meeting Minutes
3
Finke replied that the PUD concept plan and proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments
remain the same from those reviewed in November. He confirmed that some of the
infrastructure costs that the developer is willing to contribute have been made more concrete, as
requested by the Council. He confirmed that the neighborhood meeting was also held as
directed.
Martin reviewed the requests from the public that she has received to speak on this topic and
asked for input from the Council on whether that public input should be received. It was the
consensus of the Council to allow those members to speak.
William Griffith, representing the applicant, stated that this project started almost three years
ago and has evolved since that time with the intention of identifying the public benefit. He
stated that they have understood that it is the developer’s burden to prove the public benefit that
would warrant the PUD and Comprehensive Plan amendments. He stated that the surrounding
communities have pr ovided input and have either not provided comment or provided support.
He stated that staff has also commented on the significant public safety improvements and
preservation of natural open space that would be provided as a benefit. He believed that the
Council has significant legal basis to approve the requests. He recognized that this will come
down to timing. He stated that the desire would be allow this project to move forward as soon
as 2020, but more likely work would begin in 2021. He stated that during the current climate it
will be important to have projects that bring work to the community. He stated that this project
will provide certainty on public infrastructure and will provide opportunity to the marketplace. He
stated that this project is not final until it is all final, noting that the Comprehensive Plan
amendments would be dependent upon approval of the PUD and preliminary and final plat,
along with the infrastructure plans and development.
Mark Smith, applicant, thanked the City for allowing the meeting to be held in this manner during
this challenging time. He commended staff for their cooperative efforts over the past years. He
stated that they have met with staff since the November meeting to determine ways to better
identify the infrastructure costs. He hoped that the City would see the benefits of the
development and approve the requests.
Kim Hofstede, 4418 Bluebell Trail S, stated that she has frequently emailed members of the
Council and urged the Council to abide by the Comprehensive Plan that the residents and staff
worked hard to create. She did not see a reason to change the staging from 2025 for the
northern parcel. She stated that PUDs are negotiable and therefore it is unknown as to the
benefits that could be provided in the future. She stated that all the Bridgewater residents at the
public meeting opposed the development, with the exception of one resident that does not live
in the adjacent neighborhood. She stated that if the Council does approve the project, she
would want to see that the developer is held to his promises, especially with the possibly
impending recession ahead.
Eric Zehnder, 4400 Bluebell Trail S, stated that he disagrees with the applicant’s comments that
neighbors have spoke in support of the project as all the Bridgewater neighbors spoke in
opposition at the community meeting. He stated that there was overwhelming opposition and
felt like that input is not being listened to. He commented that it seems the main reason for
allowing the change in stagin g would be in return for the road construction but believed that
could occur along with a PUD request in the future. He noted that Mr. Smith already owns both
the northern and southern parcels and will likely develop those parcels himself, whether that
occurs now or later. He stated that the City could take the right-of-way when the south property
develops and then take the northern right-of-way when t hat parcel develops. He asked the
Medina City Council Excerpt from 3/17/2020 Meeting Minutes
4
Council keeps the staging as it exists. He stated that he does not oppose the project, but just
objects to the change in staging.
Monica Dawson, 4544 Trillium Ave N, stated that she has been a Medina resident since 2003
and stated that the Wayzata schools are under an oppressive amount of pressure because of
development in its member cities. She stated that this development would place additional
burden on the Wayzata School District and its taxpayers, as the school district continues to
operate under the needed amount. She state d that change in zoning from business to
residential would place additional burden on the school district. She did not believe that the
staging should be changed as it will allow additional planning time for the school district and with
adjacent communities.
Pederson stated that this property is within the Rockford School District, not the Wayzata
School District.
Finke clarified that the northern parcel is within the Rockford School District while the southern
parcel is in the Wayzata School District.
Peter Nohre, 4412 Bluebell Trail S, echoed the comments made by residents thus far. He
recognized the input and feedback from residents that helped to shape the Comprehensive
Plan, noting that staging was developed for a reason. He did not see a reason to accelerate the
staging. He stated that the Planning Commission voted to recommend denial and the majority
of residents have spoken out agains t this proposed development. He stated that he is having a
hard time to see the rationale to change the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that there is
certainty in the Comprehensive Plan, identifying the guiding and staging for development. He
did not see anything driving the need to make the changes requested and asked the Council to
consider the guidance and goals of the Comprehensive Plan, leaving the staging as it exists.
Anderson asked the applicant what the cost to the City would be if the project is approved, as it
appears that the primary cost would be $600,000 for wetland mitigation costs. He asked if there
would be other costs anticipated, outside of typical development expenses the City may have.
Mr. Smith replied that the only real cost to the City would be the cost of the wetland mitigation.
He explained that the development would propose to handle the stormwater for Chippewa
Road, noting that they worked with staff and the watershed to develop those plans.
Albers stated that when the City set forth the Comprehensive Plan, that was the vision for how
the City wanted to develop the different parts of the City. He recognized the amount of
development that continues to occur within the Wayzata School District and the pressure that is
placing on the schools. He stated that it is the City’s obligation to work within its
Comprehensive Plan, as the schools use those plans to create its plan. He asked if the
applicant has considered the burden that this could place on the school district. He asked for
details on the type of housing that would be placed in the development and the market for those
housing products.
Mr. Smith provided details on the three different housing products proposed for the property.
He stated that the north property would be proposed for one level, empty-nester type housing
that would cater to older individuals and single residents, which would not add stress onto the
schools. He stated that the southern parcel would be proposed to have 40 single-family homes,
which would cater to fami lies, and 33 townhomes that would likely cater to young working
individuals. He stated that the development would have a combination of housing products that
Medina City Council Excerpt from 3/17/2020 Meeting Minutes
5
would cater to a variety of residents and therefore would not place a huge burden onto the
school districts.
Martin recognized the comments related to the school district. She stated that she would want
to ensure that the proper letters of credit and sureties would be posted for the infrastructure
improvements in advance to building on the property.
Batty confirmed that letters of credit and surety would be required prior to permits being issued.
He noted that plats and development agreements would need to be approved prior to reaching
that step. He explained that public improvements are included in the development agreement,
with cost estimates provided by the developer and confirmed by the City Engineer with surety
being collected at a rate of 150 per cent of the estimated improvement cost.
Martin stated that she was a member of the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee and
noted that part of the issue in addressing staging of land at various times was to ensure a
variety of housing that would not negatively impact existing property values. She stated that this
proposed development would seem to provide a variety of housing products with pricing
focused on purchasers in a different price range compared to the surrounding neighborhoods
and therefore would not compete in the sales market. She stated that there is a wetland
between the Bridgewater neighborhood and this development and asked for additional
information on topography and whether the existing tree line would provide some buffering.
Mr. Smith stated that the three different types of housing would attract three different types of
customers in the market and again reviewed those details. He stated that there would be over
one quarter mile from the closest home in Bridgewater to the townhomes that would back up to
the development. He stated that there are some existing trees but recognized that the wetland
causes gaps in the tree line. He noted that the upland area would become the floodplain
mitigation area and therefore building of homes would not occur in that area.
Pederson stated that the answers that have been provided have been good answers and
appreciated everyone’s cooperation in working together on this project.
Martin asked the Council for input on the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and
whether the amendments would be appropriate based on the vision and goals of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Pederson stated that he lives the closest to this development of any person in the City, noting
that his property is zoned rural residential. He stated that he spoke with Batty and he does not
have a reason to recuse himself from the discussion. He commented that this type of
development with the public benefits would be positive things that the City needs. He stated
that the watermain is included in the City’s CIP at a cost of $325,000, should this project not
move forward. He stated that with only one water tower and a 40-year-old watermain under
Highway 55, that is a safety concern for the community. He stated that he has lived on Mohawk
Drive for a number of years and when there was a fatality, there was no other option to direct
traffic therefore there is a great need for the road to be constructed. He stated that there is a
future park planned for this area that would provide a benefit to residents in this area as well.
He stated that City staff have stated that these improvements are needed, and the City does not
own the necessary right-of-way to construct the road. He noted that land acquisition costs can
be expensive and, in this case, there is opportunity as the developer owns the land on both
sides of the road.
Medina City Council Excerpt from 3/17/2020 Meeting Minutes
6
Anderson stated that he was a part of the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee that
directed the development of the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that one of the core elements
of that plan was to maintain the rural character of the community and work to control the growth
and development. He stated that he has changed his opinion on this project and is swayed by a
single developer controlling these two parcels and coordinating the development in a manner
that will provide public benefit, including important public safety improvements. He stated that
the developer is willing to invest a significant amount of money in public infrastructure and
controls the two developments to ensure that they work together harmoniously and therefore will
support this endeavor.
DesLauriers echoed the thoughts of Pederson and Anderson. He stated that there was a
Comprehensive Plan amendment in the past for Arrowhead Drive to allow the Bridgewater
development. He stated that the savings to the City for the public infrastructure would be
between $3,000,000 and $6,000,000 and therefore that is something that has to be considered.
Albers stated that he was also a part of the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee and they
put thoughtful input into the staging plan and type of proposed development. He recognized
that changing the southern parcel guiding from business to residential does add unplanned
housing to the City, which seems to go against the goal of slowing growth in Medina. He stated
that this would potentially put stre ss on the school districts. He stated that he understands the
contribution that would be provided to the City with the construction of the public improvements
and therefore struggles with whether he could support changing the long-term vision and goals.
Martin stated that she finds it to be a difficult decision and appreciated everyone’s willingness to
discuss this openly. She stated that she tends to support the request because the public
benefits are compelling enough to move forward. She stated that she struggled with the change
to the staging plan but noted that the goal in staging properties for development was to ensure
diversity of housing and minimize competition between new and existing developments. She
believed that there was sufficient variety to support that change. She stated that she also
believes that it would be difficult to develop the southern parcel as business and therefore
supports the change to residential. She stated that she would support the Comprehensive Plan
amendments on a conditional basis, with the recognition that there are still hurdles to be
overcome.
Moved by Anderson, seconded by Pederson, to direct staff to prepare a resolution conditionally
approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and authorizing submission to the Metropolitan
Council, subject to the conditions and comments noted in the staff report and discussed by the
Council. Motion passed unanimously.
Martin asked if there are additional comments related to the proposed PUD concept plan.
Finke stated that from the initial review by the Council, the concept plan remains unchanged.
He stated that at this time, through the discussion with the applicant, this is not a fully developed
plan at this point and there is an opportunity for comments to guide the design of the
development. He explained that the Comprehensive Plan amendments relate to the use and
timing on the property with ultimate design to be completed upon formal application.
Martin stated that there is some distance between the proposed development and the existing
neighborhood to the east. She stated that she would like to see a more amplified landscaping
plan that would speak to the viewshed from Arrowhead or Chippewa. She stated that she would
Medina City Council Excerpt from 3/17/2020 Meeting Minutes
7
also like additional information on the diversity in housing elevations and building materials for
the homes.
Pederson echoed the same concerns with having adequate screening around the project to the
best ability of the developer from the adjacent neighborhoods and roadways. He commented
that the driveway would be across from the Wealshire entrance and hoped for a grandiose
entrance that would be aesthetically pleasing.
Albers echoed some of the thoughts related to additional screening. He also proposed some
boulevard trees along Chippewa Road. He asked if the road would be lit with streetlights.
Finke replied that the road would be a public improvement and therefore the City would provide
guidance. He stated that there should be discussion in the future, noting that the roadway
would most likely not be lit but lighting for the trail could be important.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 11/10/2020 Minutes
1
Weston Woods of Medina – Mark Smith – North of Hwy 55, East of Mohawk Drive –
Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development General Plan – Development of 76
Twinhomes, 42 Single-Family, and 32 Townhomes – PIDs 0311823420001,
0311823410001, 0311823430005, and 0311823130002
Finke presented a request for a PUD and Preliminary Plat for the Weston Woods development which
includes a 150-unit residential development and seven-acre passive park area that would be dedicated to
the City. In April, the Council adopted conditional approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment for
this parcel and reviewed a Concept Plan for this PUD. Since that time, the City has submitted an
environmental assessment worksheet to the State for comment and review, which relates to the wetland
impacts contemplated for the Chippewa Road extension from Mohawk Drive to Arrowhead. He stated
that none of the agencies recommended that the more in-depth environmental review be required. He
stated that the following week staff is recommending that the Council make the determination that an
environmental impact statement not be required. He displayed an aerial photograph of the subject site
and reviewed the zoning designation/land uses of each of the two parcels along with adjacent properties.
He identified the areas of the project proposed for townhomes, twinhomes and single-family homes. He
provided details on the Chippewa Road extension. He stated that the applicant has requested a Planned
Unit Development (PUD), which allows flexibility to the zoning standards in return for better serving the
objectives of the zoning ordinance and other City objectives. He provided details on three different types
of lots proposed, noting that most of the flexibility requested is internal to the site which allows more
open space on the periphery of the site. He reviewed the details related to architectural design and
provided photograph examples of the different home products. He stated that the southern site includes
about 14 acres of woodlands, noting that half of that area would be preserved as a passive park. He noted
that tree replacement would be required for removals above what is allowed by Code. He provided
details on wetland impacts and infrastructure. He noted that the plat would be contingent upon approval
of the PUD. He stated that two public comments were received, one of which was included in the
Commission packet, and provided to the Commission. He stated that staff recommends approval of the
PUD and Preliminary Plat subject to the conditions listed in the staff report.
Nielsen asked and received confirmation that the Planning Commission recommended denial of the
Comprehensive Plan amendment. She referenced the proposed list of conditions and asked where the
road would fall in that list.
Finke confirmed that would be included in condition six.
Grajczyk asked if the developer intends to build the twinhomes and townhomes but not the single-family
homes.
Finke replied that the applicant can answer that question in their presentation.
Popp referenced condition 10 and asked if that would mean that the watermain would not source the
irrigation system.
Finke confirmed that to be true. He explained that the City does not allow any new residential
development to use the City’s domestic water system for lawn and landscape irrigation. He stated that the
applicant proposes stormwater reuse to supply water for irrigation purposes.
Popp referenced condition 12 and asked for a highlight of recommendations that may be included from
the City Engineer related to Chippewa Road.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 11/10/2020 Minutes
2
Finke stated that the primary comments were to attempt to reduce the wetland impacts for the roadway.
He noted that as the broader permit process is completed for Chippewa Road there will be many other
comments from multiple agencies and the plan will be adjusted throughout the process.
Mark Smith, applicant, stated that they intend not to build the single-family product as their main
business has been the construction of twinhomes and townhomes. He stated that he is present to address
any additional questions.
Reid opened the public hearing at 7:28 p.m.
Doug Macky, 4562 Bluebell Trail N, stated that initially this project stirred up a lot of discussion amongst
his neighbors. He stated that after reviewing the plan and the evolution over the past year, this looks like
a great use and similar neighborhood. He stated that they were pleased with the Fields of Medina
neighborhood, including the trails and park, which have benefited the residents. He stated that he is
excited to have a product of this type in the community that is available for those in the community that
are aging or attempting to downsize. He referenced the park and private trails proposed and asked how
the Bridgewater residents could access those amenities as there is not a park within Bridgewater.
Mr. Smith stated that they would have a trail that would be constructed with the new Chippewa Road and
would connect to Arrowhead and that trail. He stated that there is another connecting point that will link
to the park. He confirmed that there would be access for the Bridgewater residents to enjoy those
amenities.
Mr. Macky commented that this looks like a great development and does not believe there is an
opposition from the existing residents. He stated that this will be a benefit to the area.
Finke acknowledged the written comment received after the packet was sent out from the resident at 4111
Cavanaugh in support of the project and will become part of the record.
Todd Albers, 4800 Cubby Trail, asked if the single-family home product could be switched to townhomes
if the market does not have demand for single-family homes.
Mr. Smith replied that their intent would not be to change that housing product, as there is a strong
demand for single-family housing. He explained that his business typically does not construct custom
single-family homes and therefore they would use a different builder for that product to compliment the
other housing products. He stated that they would not propose to add additional twinhomes or
townhomes. He stated that there is a demand for the twinhome and townhome product in this area, noting
that even some Bridgewater residents have expressed interest as their children age, and they are looking
to downsize.
Reid closed the public hearing at 7:38 p.m.
Galzki stated that he is happy to hear the residents in this area are supportive of the project and hopes that
is a result of communication with the developer. He stated that he appreciates the changes that have been
made by the developer and the contributions, especially the Chippewa Road extension. He commented
that although this would require some changes and flexibility, it would provide an overall benefit to the
community as well.
Piper commented that she is impressed and will be eager to see what is done with the park area. She
commented that for the number of homes in that area, 5.1 acres feels small for a park. She stated that she
does like the design.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 11/10/2020 Minutes
3
Nielsen commented that she is still not in favor of moving up the staging but believes that good
adjustments have been made to the plan and sees the benefits that would be provided to the City. She was
also pleased that those previously opposed to the development in the neighboring development are now
supportive.
Grajczyk thanked the applicant and City staff for working together to find the best ways to make use of
the property and work with the neighboring residents. He commented that he likes the layout in this
design better, which provides more buffered areas between the development and adjacent properties.
Couri stated that she agrees with the comments that this would provide a housing product needed in the
community to allow residents to downsize from their larger homes. She stated that this appears to be a
well-done project.
Popp stated that initially he was hesitant because of the staging and slow growth vision of the
Comprehensive Plan. He commented that this is a well thought out design and appreciates the
preservation of open space and wetland. He stated that the benefits to the City are also obvious and he is
pleased with the development and reaction of the neighboring residents.
Reid commented that when the Commission previously reviewed the project the request was made to
provide a variety of architectural styles and designs, which has been done. She stated that adding this
variety of housing will be a benefit to Medina and she is happy with the proposed plan.
Finke commented that there is a park search in this area to serve not only this site but other properties that
will develop in this area.
Motion by Piper, seconded by Nielsen, to recommend approval of the PUD General Plan of
Development and Preliminary Plat, subject to the conditions noted in the staff report.
A roll call vote was performed:
Nielsen aye
Galzki aye
Piper aye
Grajczyk aye
Couri aye
Popp aye
Reid aye
Motion carries unanimously.
Medina Park Commission Excerpt from 11/18/2020 Minutes
1
Weston Woods of Medina – Park Dedication Review
Finke provided a staff report for the Weston Woods preliminary plat and PUD request,
located east of Mohawk Drive and north of Highway 55. The applicant has proposed 150-
unit residential development on two properties with 76 twinhomes on the northern
property, 42 single-family homes, 32 townhomes and a 7-acre park/nature preserve (5.1
net acres).
Finke stated that the Park Commission had reviewed this plan at a concept level a year
ago. He noted that on April 7, 2020 the City Council provided a conditional approval for
a Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
Finke showed an aerial of the site, noting that Polaris and The Wealshire are located to
the west of the site. OSI is southeast of the large wetland, along with additional future
Business property to the north of OSI. Bridgewater neighborhood is located across the
large wetland to the east of the site. There are homes on rural lots north and northwest of
the site, which are included in future development area designations in future
Comprehensive Plan processes.
Finke stated that the Park Dedication Ordinance requires dedication at the rate of 10%
land, 8% cash value of the pre-developed land, or a combination thereof. This property
would calculate to 7.1 acres of land or approximately $525,000 of cash in-lieu.
Finke stated that the subject site has 14 acres of Maple Basswood forest in moderate
quality on the southern portion. He noted that the proposed 7 acres of preserved
woodland is from the southern half of this 14-acre woods. The City’s natural resources
specialists walked the site and believed that the southern portion was the best quality
woods with less invasive species and has a mix of old and new trees.
Finke noted that the City’s Park and Trails plan identifies an active park search area near
this site, and the Park Commission had discussed a year ago and recommended at the
time to locate the active park on other nearby properties as the opportunity arises. The
Park and Trails plan also identifies trails along the new Chippewa Road and from
Chippewa Road through the northern property to Mohawk Drive, which the applicant has
addressed in their proposal along with proposed private trails through the twinhomes and
townhomes to connect to the preserved woodland.
Finke stated that the preserved woods to the City accounts for the park dedication
requirements of the subdivision. In addition to the dedication, the applicant’s proposed
trail improvements are additional amenities related to obtaining the maximum density for
the townhome development and in connection with the PUD and Comprehensive Plan
Amendment.
Thies questioned how the City will delineate property as park land, since several private
homes will abut the City owned 7-acre woods? She noted that property owners will likely
Medina Park Commission Excerpt from 11/18/2020 Minutes
2
start to encroach on the woods and slowly start using more of the woods as their private
property.
Finke stated there could be signage at the corners of each lot.
Finke asked the Park Commission if they wanted the proposed trail through the
townhomes to be public or private?
Discussion occurred whether the trail should be private or public, noting that if the trail is
public it will be the City’s responsibility to maintain. It was questioned if the trail could
remain privately owned but allow the public to use it?
Mark Smith, the applicant, stated that he is open to ideas, but wanted to make sure to
protect the HOA, so he would refer to his attorney Bill Griffith to comment.
Griffith recommended that if the City would like the public to be able to access the trail,
the simplest course of action would be to make the trail public.
It was confirmed that a sidewalk would run all along Hillside Lane, but that would entail
residents crossing a number of driveways to access the wooded trail. Consensus was to
make this trail through the townhomes a public trail. It also lines up with the trail north
of Cherokee Road.
There would not be a request for a trail along Mohawk Drive south of Cherokee Road,
but that the road shoulder be graded as best as possible for a potential future use.
A motion was made by Lee , with a friendly amendment by Thies, and seconded by Jacob
to recommend to the city council to accept the 7.1 acre passive park land for park
dedication purposes,( with boundary markers at the residential lot lines,) along with
accepting the construction of the Chippewa Road Trail, construction of the trail within
the park land, construction of the northern option trail, construction of a trail connecting
the townhomes to the park land (center-option 1,on staff report), and accepting the
townhome trail connection as a public trail
A roll call vote was taken:
Park Commissioner Ann Thies - aye
Park Commissioner Terry Sharp - aye
Park Commissioner Steve Lee - aye
Park Commissioner John Jacob – aye
Park Commissioner Troy Hutchinson – aye
Park Commissioner Mary Morrison – aye
Park Commissioner Angela Bernhardt – aye
Motion passed unanimously.
1
Dusty Finke
From:Tony Havranek <THavranek@wsbeng.com>
Sent:Monday, October 21, 2019 8:49 AM
To:Dusty Finke
Cc:Steve Scherer; Jodi Gallup; Jim Stremel
Subject:Mark of Excellence_woodlots
Attachments:MAP_MarkofExcellence_woodlots.pdf
Dusty,
This email summarizes our site visit to the Mark of Excellence site on October 16, 2019 to review the woodlot
composition/quality of the parcels. This visit was a follow up to our initial survey completed on October 6, 2017.
Attached is a map of the different forest stands that we observed. I labeled them 1‐5.
Stand 1 is similar to what we observed on our 2017 site visit:
“The northeastern portion of the woodland, north of the ditch, is correctly classified by the Hennepin County Nat Res
layer as a mesic oak woodland. Both white oak and red oak occur in this portion of the forest. All oak would be
classified as large to very large trees (DBH > 21”). The oak component would be classified as even age, meaning that
these are all mature trees. No oak regeneration was observed (sapling/seedling size class). The number of individual
trees is small compared to other species (ash), but the size of the trees causes them to be the dominant species in terms
of canopy coverage and basal area.
It should be noted that there were a small number of very large sugar maple as well.
The understory in this location was dominated by buckthorn, with some ironwood. Without management, this area
would more than likely transition to buckthorn/elm/basswood/ash due to oak mortality due to wind events, disease,
and old age.” (From 2017 summary)
It appears that buckthorn is more common in the understory compared to the 2017 visit.
Stand 2 is also similar to the 2017 visit except, similar to stand 1, buckthorn is more common:
“The area between the knoll and south of the ditch, maintains an oak component similar to the one described above,
but
ash becomes more prevalent (pole to medium tree size 5‐10” DBH). The buckthorn is much smaller here (seedlings) and
is not as dense.” (From 2017 summary).
Stand 3, the top of the knoll, is still in state of regeneration (mostly maple) with some buckthorn occurring under canopy
openings. One thing that was different from our 2017 visit is that we observed oak (white/bur) seedlings on the forest
floor in a few areas. These may continue to grow under shady conditions along with the maple. Below is the 2017
summary:
“The knoll consists of a uneven‐age sugar maple stand with some large ‐very large white oak. This portion of the forest
would more than likely be sustainable for the long term since the seedling/sapling/pole size class will succeed the
mature trees as they die. Very little to no buckthorn is found here. This area is typed as a basswood/sugar maple by the
Hennepin County Nat Res inventory. The basswood component is present, but somewhat minor when compared to the
sugar maple component.”
2
Stand 4 was not walked in 2017, but general comments were provided:
“The southern portion of the forest is similar to what was observed in the northeast portion described in the first
Paragraph (stand 1).”
We did walk this site during the 2019 visit. This stand consisted of various age classes and species. Oak appeared to
dominate the canopy, but many poletimber sized ash and maple were found within the stand, with some regeneration,
but not as much as was observed in stand 3.. Buckthorn was also present.
Stand 5 was not surveyed in 2017, but was surveyed during our 2019 site visit. Buckthorn (mature, sapling, and
seedling) dominated the understory and was the only tree/shrub species present along the periphery. Oak, ash, and
willow were also found within this stand, with oak being the most dominant tree species. However, the number of
individual oaks was small and no oak regen was observed.
Overall, stand 3 provides the highest quality woodlot as it contains the least amount of buckthorn, and supports uneven
age tree species, while also supporting quality mature seed trees.
Take care,
Tony Havranek
Senior Ecologist
651.286.8473 (o) | 612.246.9346 (m)
WSB | wsbeng.com
This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and is intended solely
for the use of the addressee. If you are not the addressee, please delete this email
from your system. Any use of this email by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited.
WSB does not accept liability for any errors or omissions which arise as a result
of electronic transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard copy.
1
2
3
4
5
1 inch = 288 f eet
Document Path: K:\014630-000\G
IS\Maps\MAP_M
arkofExcellence_woodlots.mxd Date Saved: 10/21/2019 8:29:47 AM
Mark of ExcellenceCity of Medina
Figure 1- Woodlot Survey ¯
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2020-11-12 Submittal\_2020-11-18 Weston Woods Prelim Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
7
0
1
X
E
N
I
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
|
S
U
I
T
E
3
0
0
|
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
,
M
N
|
5
5
4
1
6
|
7
6
3
.
5
4
1
.
4
8
0
0
|
W
S
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
November 19, 2020
Mr. Dusty Finke
Planning Director
City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340-9790
Re: Weston Woods Preliminary Plat & PUD Plan – Engineering Review
City Project No. LR-20-280
WSB Project No. 016964-000
Dear Mr. Finke:
We have reviewed Weston Woods Preliminary Plat & PUD Plan submittal dated November 12,
2020. The plans propose to develop 131 gross acres of land located north of Highway 55 and
East of Mohawk Drive with a mix of residential properties including single-family, twin homes, and
row townhomes. The proposed project also includes the construction of Chippewa Road from
Mohawk Drive to Arrowhead Drive.
The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina’s general
engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with
regards to engineering and stormwater management matters.
General
1. Provide soil borings and geotechnical analysis for Chippewa Road. In-progress, awaiting
freeze-up within wetland areas.
2. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building
structures and required turn around space (cul-de-sac, hammerhead, etc.) as required by
the Fire Marshall. A Hammerhead may be required by the Fire Marshall at the dead end
streets (without a cul-de-sac). Complete, the applicant revised to a cul-de-sac, the City
Fire Marshall will provide a final review of all emergency access.
Preliminary Plat (C0.2, C0.3)
3. See comments from City Planner and City Attorney.
4. Provide specific drainage and utility easements outside of roadway areas instead of
noting them as outlots. In-progress, applicant noted outlots will have blanket D&U
easement over entire outlots.
5. Provide perimeter drainage and utility easements along the boundary of the property,
where applicable. Complete.
Provide 100’ right of way in and around the Arrowhead Drive connection for future turn
lanes and/or widening. Show the proposed Chippewas ROW linework more clearly on the
utility/grading plans when revised. In-progress with Chippewa Road design revisions.
Existing Condition Sheet (C1.1)
6. Note removals occurring in and around Arrowhead Drive. In-progress, final removals
plan to be provided with Final Plat submittal.
City of Medina – Weston Woods Preliminary Plat & PUD Plan – Engineering Review
November 19, 2020
Page 2
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2020-11-12 Submittal\_2020-11-18 Weston Woods Prelim Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
Site Plan Sheets (C2.1, C2.2)
7. Include hatching for differing pavement types (streets, concrete sidewalk, bituminous trail,
etc.) with a legend. Reference the applicable typical sections located on the detail sheets.
8. Include the rest of Chippewa Road on the final site and paving sheets.
Streets, Grading, & Drainage, Erosion Control Sheets (C3.0 to C3.7)
Street Design:
9. City design standards require horizontal and vertical curve lengths to meet a 30 MPH
design speed for local/private streets, at minimum. The geometrics of the new Chippewa
Road extension (classified as a collector roadway) should be based on a 40 MPH design
speed. For private roadways the City will allow a 20 MPH design if signed a such. The
minimum curve radius for a 20 MPH curve is 96’.
10. The City may require that a trail corridor is established through the property to connect to
future developments to the north. See City Planner comments. In-progress by applicant.
11. Review sight distance design on Chippewa Road and Arrowhead Drive (both north and
south). The City would prefer to see vertical profile grades less than 5% on Arrowhead
Drive.
12. With Final Plat submittal, include the following:
a. With future submittals, provide profile view of streets that include stationing,
curve length, percent grade, and other standard geometric/design information.
Add stationing to plan view on all sheets and horizontal curve information on the
street design sheets.
b. Applicable City standard detail plates, see specific notes in section below.
c. With final construction plans, provide a signing and striping sheet(s).
d. The typical section for overall street width provided for Chippewa Road is
generally acceptable but provide a 6’ wide paved shoulder (reduce the gravel
shoulder width respectively), 1’ gravel shoulder, 11’ travel lanes.
e. Add street names to all applicable streets. In-progress.
Grading and Erosion Control:
13. Add storm sewer and sanitary manhole structure numbers to grading sheets.
City of Medina – Weston Woods Preliminary Plat & PUD Plan – Engineering Review
November 19, 2020
Page 3
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2020-11-12 Submittal\_2020-11-18 Weston Woods Prelim Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
14. Grading for Pond 12P is located outside of available property/right-of-way. Pond location
adjusted, but additional grading still shown outside of ROW. Applicant will need to
coordinate approvals with adjacent property owner.
15. Provide EOFs for all low points inside and outside the roadway.
16. Provide spot elevations at the high points between the lots. Complete.
17. Maintain all surface grades within the minimum 2% and maximum 33% slopes.
Acknowledged by applicant.
18. Label the 100-yr floodplain elevation on the grading plans.
19. Label the 100-yr HWL elevation of the wetlands on the grading plan. Complete
20. Label the EOF elevation for Wetland 1d.
21. Verify the EOF spot elevation for Pond 18P. Complete.
Watermain, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Sewer Utility Sheets (C4.1, C4.2)
General:
22. Provide confirmation of MDH (watermain) and MPCA (sanitary sewer) plan review and
permitting with final construction plans.
23. Describe and label all connections to existing utilities.
24. With Final Plat submittal provide profile view of utilities noting size, type, and percent
grade. Include structure information with rim and invert elevations.
25. Any public sanitary sewer and watermain shall be encompassed by drainage and utility
easements where located outside of public road right of way. Drainage and utility
easements will need to allow for a 1:1 trench from the invert of the utility with a minimum
of 20’ centered on the utility. In-progress.
Watermain:
26. Note the size and pipe type of the proposed watermain on the utility sheets. Complete.
27. Watermain looping connections will be needed to minimize long dead-end watermain
sections. The City will require a 12-inch watermain loop between Mohawk Road and
Arrowhead Drive. Provide watermain stub for future connections to the northerly property
as far to the east as possible (from the easterly street location) so that the distance is as
far from Mohawk as possible. A looping connection will be required to connect the north
end of the watermain on Short Way Rd/Ct to the 12” watermain on Chippewa Road. The
City’s preference would be to connect as close to the end of the cul-de-sac as possible.
28. With Final Plat submittal, include the following:
a. Include the location of water service lines and curb stops.
b. Verify that adequate water pressure will be available for those lots served by City
water.
c. The watermain alignment and connection along the proposed Chippewa Road
alignment will be reviewed by the City in further detail with future submittals. The
City’s preference for watermain materials is PVC C900. Hydrant locations shall
be approved of by the Fire Marshal; typically, a maximum of 250’ radius is
required to serve the immediate residential areas.
City of Medina – Weston Woods Preliminary Plat & PUD Plan – Engineering Review
November 19, 2020
Page 4
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2020-11-12 Submittal\_2020-11-18 Weston Woods Prelim Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
d. The City’s preference is to utilize the existing utility crossings on Mohawk Road
to minimize the need to disturb the street. This may require removing the
existing service stubs from the casings and extending larger mains to the existing
north/south trunk line on Mohawk. In-progress, applicant noted the stubs are not
in ideal locations or sized for connections based on the proposed site layout, this
will require additional review and discussion by city staff/applicant.
e. A review of the proposed gate valve locations will be provided by the City Public
Works Department.
Sanitary Sewer:
29. City design standards require 10.5’ sanitary sewer manhole builds, but at no point shall
build depths be less than 8’. With final construction plans, show sanitary sewer service
lines and invert elevations on plans; the City requires a minimum depth of 3’ from low
floor elevations. Complete.
30. Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities (Ten States Standards) guidance
does not allow oversizing of mains to achieved full-flow velocities at flatter grades.
Confirm capacity and need for larger main, if shown. Complete, 10” pipe changed to 8”.
31. Provide a sanitary sewer stub to the northerly property if gravity sewer is feasible.
Complete, stub provided where feasible but applicant noted northerly property will likely
need a lift station.
Storm Sewer:
32. At the northerly entrance off of Mohawk Road, it appears the FES on the north and south
sides of the roadway will not have adequate cover. Consider the use of a catch basin in
these locations. Review plans for other instances of pipe cover inadequacies. Complete.
33. Consider adjusting the slope of culvert segment FES801-FES800 to reduce velocity to
less than 6 fps as it discharges to Wetland 2. Complete.
34. The maximum design flow at a catch basin for the 10-yr storm event shall be 3 cfs,
please review segment CB1503 to CB1502. Complete.
35. With Final Plat submittal, the City will require a common draintile collection system (rigid
PVC) for sump pump discharges. A separate foundation pipe system in addition to the
sump discharge system should be considered where full basements are proposed.
Applicant noted they will add this to final plat where needed.
Standard Details Sheets (C7.1 to C7.3)
36. On the typical sections provided, list each street with the proposed street design. For
Chippewa Road include with the typical section where the trail is located and the
appropriate boulevard width and slopes.
37. Confirm street design with the geotechnical analysis.
38. Provide typical sections for proposed stormwater treatment areas.
39. Provide specific details for each control structure.
Traffic & Access
40. The private streets accessing Chippewa Road just east of Mohawk Drive from both the
north and south side need to line up with each other. The street should be located as far
east as possible. In-progress, the roadways now line up (northerly moved west and
southerly moved east) but should be moved to the east as far as possible. This may
City of Medina – Weston Woods Preliminary Plat & PUD Plan – Engineering Review
November 19, 2020
Page 5
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2020-11-12 Submittal\_2020-11-18 Weston Woods Prelim Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
require reconfiguration of the roadway system so that the distance between Mohawk and
the new intersection is 300’.
41. Provide an analysis of all development specific traffic generation including a
determination on whether or not turn lanes will be required on Chippewa Road and/or
Mohawk Drive at the proposed development access points. This specific analysis was
not completed with the City visioning study.
42. Provided a detailed plan showing the required turn lanes at the intersections of Chippewa
Road at Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road at Arrowhead Drive consistent with the
Chippewa Road Visioning Study recommended improvements.
43. Provide safety (sight line) analysis at the site driveways on Chippewa Road and Mohawk
Drive. Confirm vertical curves on Chippewa Road and Arrowhead Drive (both north and
south) achieve sight distance design requirements.
Stormwater
44. The development will need to meet the appropriate watershed standards and submit for
the required permits. Provide permit to City when complete.
45. The City requires two feet of freeboard from structure low openings to 100-year high
water levels and EOF’s.
a. Freeboard is not met from the 100-yr HWL for lots 19-20, 23-32, Block 8. Complete
b. Freeboard is not met from the EOF for lots 71-74, Block 7.
c. With an EOF elevation of 987.5 for Wetland 1f, freeboard from the EOF is not met for
lot 5, Block 6.
d. Freeboard is not met from the 100-yr HWL of Pond 20P for Lots 1, Block 5
e. Lowest basement elevation is mislabeled off by 100 on the following:
a. lots 1-5, Block 6
b. 1-3 & 7-10, Block 5.
46. Provide and label maintenance access to all ponding facilities. Easement width shall not
be narrower than 20-feet. Clarify access route for Ponds 16P and 15P
47. The table below summarizes the 100-yr bounce in the wetlands from the existing to
proposed condition. It also identifies wetland protection classification. According to the
City of Medina Stormwater Design Manual, the bounce of water level within the wetland
is restricted as summarized below.
Please add the wetland protection classification to the table in the appendix of the
Stormwater Management Plan. The table below is the allowable bounce for each Manage
Classification:
City of Medina – Weston Woods Preliminary Plat & PUD Plan – Engineering Review
November 19, 2020
Page 6
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2020-11-12 Submittal\_2020-11-18 Weston Woods Prelim Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
The bounce restriction is not met for a majority of the wetlands onsite.
48. The development will need to meet the City’s volume control requirement. The provided
narrative indicates stormwater ponds 1P and 20P will be constructed for water reuse. A
water reuse design submittal must at a minimum include the following:
· An analysis using the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District Stormwater
Reuse Calculator. Complete
· Provide the stage storage tables for Ponds 1P and 20P, for the permanent pool
storage amount, to verify the Estimated reuse storage volume in the calculator. City
requires that 2 feet of the permanent pool from the bottom of the pond be maintained
and not counted towards reuse total. Complete
· Provide an exhibit of the application areas described at 18.75 acres and 11.79 acres
for Pond 1P and Pond 20P respectively.
· Documentation demonstrating adequacy of soils, storage system, and delivery
system. Complete
· Operations and maintenance plan.
49. Provide a summary and exhibit showing the floodplain impacts. Filling activities must not
increase the stage of the 100-yr flood. Compensatory storage for any filling in the 100-yr
floodplain shall be at a ratio of 1:1.
50. Provide an EOF for Wetland 5a/5b at Short Way Road crossing.
HydroCAD Modeling:
51. Wetland 1e model information is off by 100. The HWL elevation in the model is reported
as 883.92 and should be 983.92, please correct. Complete
52. Drainage from properties to the west of Mohawk Drive are conveyed through the
southeasterly portion of the Weston Woods property via the existing creek into the
wetland(s). The stormwater modeling and storm sewer design will need to accommodate
this flow and conveyance. Model Wetland 5a/5b with storage to ensure proper sizing of
the culvert under the roadway and estimate the HWL of this basin area. Provide Culvert
sizing information for the culvert at the Short Way Road crossing, this culvert does not
appear to be modeled in HydroCAD.
City of Medina – Weston Woods Preliminary Plat & PUD Plan – Engineering Review
November 19, 2020
Page 7
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2020-11-12 Submittal\_2020-11-18 Weston Woods Prelim Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
Wetlands & Environmental
53. The concept plan shows wetland impact in several locations. Wetland replacement plan
approval is required prior to any wetland impact.
a. Ensure that culvert outfalls and associated riprap are included in the overall
impact calculation.
b. Interior roadways are shown to cross wetlands in multiple locations. In order to
maintain hydrology between the wetland basins, plans should include culverts
under these roadways. If culverts are not proposed, any secondary impacts to
wetlands because of reduced hydrology will require replacement at a minimum
2:1 ratio.
54. Consider design alternatives that reduce wetland impacts along Chippewa Road through
the DNR wetland such as:
c. Use an urban rather than rural section. If urban, utilize surmountable curbing to
minimize entrapment of turtles/wildlife.
d. Design the trail parallel to the roadway (assuming urban section) or move trail
away from roadway alignment (consider using existing roadbed).
55. Include turtle crossing culverts in the design of Chippewa Road within the DNR wetland.
56. Various wetlands may not meet the average and/or minimum buffer requirements
approved by the city, as shown in the table below. A variance from the City’s buffer
ordinance will be required for these areas.
Wetland ID Proposed Buffer Width (ft) City-Approved Buffer Width (ft)
WL1d 35 35 avg (25 min)
WL1e 50 35 avg (25 min)
Confirm these above-listed wetlands meet the minimum buffer width requirements.
Specifically, WL1d along the northern boundary and WL1e along the southern border
abutting Chippewa Road.
57. Confirm that WL1h meets the average and minimum buffer widths as noted in the table
on C2.2. Based on the scale it does not appear to meet the minimum width.
58. Specify the native seed mix to be used to vegetate the upland buffers.
59. Comments provided with EAW responses from governing agencies may require special
considerations for endangered species. General notes and informational sheets may
need to be incorporated into plans. Further review will be provided with future submittals
and resolution of EAW comments.
60. Page L2.1 Landscape Requirements- Tree Replacement identifies 1,720 significant trees
on the site with 842 significant trees being removed (49% significant trees removed).
Medina City code 828.41 subd. 6 requires that for parcels larger than 20 acres during
initial site development up to 10% of significant trees may be removed during initial site
development. This would allow the developer to remove 172 trees without needing to
provide tree replacement. The plan set identifies allowed removal of 15% or 258 trees
which is not correct, unless a waiver has been granted. Based on the proposed % of tree
removal the developer will need to provide replacement.
61. Tree replacement is based on caliper measurement, not number of trees. The applicable
ratio is 1 caliper inch of replacement tree to 1 caliper inch of significant trees lost. The
City of Medina – Weston Woods Preliminary Plat & PUD Plan – Engineering Review
November 19, 2020
Page 8
K:\016964-000\Admin\Docs\2020-11-12 Submittal\_2020-11-18 Weston Woods Prelim Plat & PUD - WSB Comments.docx
plan identifies the number of trees required (584) and uses the diameter of the smallest
584 trees, but 828.41 does not have a provision that allows the use of the smallest
diameter trees, rather the sum of the inches of tree to be removed should be summed
and provided.
62. Acceptable trees species list matches the list provided in 828.10. However, it should be
noted in the plans that each of the planted trees will need protection (fencing/bud caps) to
protect from herbivory.
63. One of the tree replacement areas identified in the northeast corner of the development is
also identified as a potential borrow site in Figure 3-site plan of the EAW document. This
may not be conducive to tree planting. Soil amendments may be necessary prior to
planting.
The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted
plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or
modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards.
We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if
you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet.
Sincerely,
WSB
Jim Stremel, P.E.
City Engineer
DUSTY FINKE
PLANNING DIRECTOR
DUSTY.FINKE@MEDINAMN.GOV
Dusty,
I have reached out before regarding the Weston Woods Project slated for review and discussion
at your upcoming council meeting on 11/10. l intend on being present.
! am reaching out again to ask you to rescind my previous comments delivered in email on
September 301h, 2019. I have had time to do some research into the project and I am now in full
support of Weston Woods moving forward. I want to provide a few reasons as to why.
First, ! am pro -growth for Medina and our neighboring communities. For far too long our
neighborhood has felt like more country living than a community, too far from civilization. With
the development and build out of Fields of Medina, it has brought us many new great friends
and neighbors that our families enjoy. We couldn't be happier about the park and play field
there. I am sure someone from our neighborhood is there almost daily. Additionally, we have
seen no increase in crime or foot traffic as we irrationally feared.
Second, In examining Weston Woods, it appears there is a fairly substantial park and easy
access from our neighborhood to theirs, even closer than Fields of Medina. We love these trails
and until Fields of Medina went in, there was no safe way to exit our neighborhood and he d
east. Now, jogging and bike riding out of our development is easy, safe, and fun and we i ok
forward to visiting Weston Woods in the same way.
4562 Bluebell Trail N Medina, MN 55340
Third, the Weston Woods proposal is a product Medina needs more of. My mother in law, Barb,
was recently diagnosed with Alzheimer's. Barb and her husband Tom, are planning on
downsizing and are considering relocating to be nearer to us. There is nothing in Medina even
remotely close to this product that offers comfortable, upscale living that is complimentary to a
neighborhood like Bridgewater and Fields of Medina, it will be a great blend for the community.
I have no doubt there are other people like us that would appreciate having a place for friends
and family to live closer.
Lastly, I can't tell you how often I hear neighbors say "I wish we had more retail stores out
here". We are all hoping for more retail and commercial. But as we all know, until we have
more residential, the commercial will not develop. With these thoughts in mind, I wanted to
reach out and offer my full support.
Sincerely,
Doug Mackey
qrL 96-7 c-3 89
2
Steven Heintz
4111 CAVANAUGH DR
MEDINA, MN 55340
steve@heintzclarkltd.com
November 7, 2020
Mr, Finke,
I am a resident of Medina, living in the Fields of Medina neighborhood. My address is 4111
Cavanaugh Dr. I am writing in regard to my support for the Weston Woods Project.
I believe growth in Medina is inevitable and wanted by most residents. This growth should be
carefully planned and executed. I feel the Weston Woods Project fits into the Vision of the
Comprehensive Plan for several reasons:
First, it enhances the quality of life for the residents by providing housing to a variety of
homeowners. It allows younger families to move to the City. It allows families to “move-up”
into larger housing. It also allows for families and couples to “downsize”, while staying within
the City. This meets the Goal of “Provide opportunities for a diversity of housing at a range of
costs to support residents in all stages of their lives”.
Second, the project appears to protect all the natural resources in the project area, while
converting some of the open space to well-designed places of recreation. This recreation will
serve not only the residents that live in Weston Woods, but also the many surrounding
neighborhoods, such as mine. This meets the Goal of: “Promote public and private gathering
places and civic events that serve the entire community”.
Finally, the project also improves the surrounding roads and transportation. This is needed due
to the other development that has taken place in the area. This will make both car and pedestrian
travel in the area safer and more enjoyable.
As Medina grows, the Hwy 55 corridor will continue to be some of the first land developed. I
feel the Weston Woods Project is a good development for the area that not only meets, but helps
the City achieve the Vision and Goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
Thank you,
STEVEN HEINTZ
November 6, 2020
Dusty Finke AICP
City Planner
City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340-9790
Re: Weston Woods of Medina; Comprehensive Plan Amendment and PUD Development
Plan for PIDs 03-118-23-42-0001, 03-118-23-41-0001, and 03-118-23-43-0005
Dear Mr. Finke:
We represent Mark of Excellence Homes (“MOE”) regarding the proposed Weston Woods of
Medina project (“Project”) located in the City of Medina (“City”). The Project includes
development on approximately 131 gross acres of land located north of Highway 55 and East of
Mohawk Drive with a mix of single-family development, twinhomes, and row townhomes. This
letter is the narrative in support of the following applications by MOE:
(1) rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD);
(2) approval of PUD development plan; and
(3) Preliminary Plat
This narrative describes the Project’s compliance with requirements for approval of the
applications, as well as the significant public benefit associated with the Project.
Background and Project Description
The Project includes four parcels (the “Properties), consisting of the “Southerly Site,” totaling
approximately 52.61 acres, located east of Mohawk Drive and north of Highway 55; and the
“Northerly Site” an approximately 74.74-acre parcel located east of Mohawk Drive and
immediately north of and adjacent to the Southerly Site. MOE is seeking to develop the
Properties with a mix of single-family homes, twinhomes, and row townhomes with an average
overall density of approximately 3.08 units per acre. The Northerly Site will include
approximately 47.33 acres of wetland and buffer area. The Southerly Site will include
approximately 26.42 acres of wetland and buffers, and 7.17 buildable acres of open space (which
includes 5.1 net acres of parkland).
Dusty Finke AICP
November 6, 2020
Page 2
Gross Area Wetlands/Buffer Parks/Open Space Net Developable
Northerly Site 74.74 acres 47.33 acres 0 acres 27.41 acres
Southerly Site 52.61 acres 26.42 acres 5.1 net acres 21.3 acres
Project Total 127.35 acres 73.75 acres 5.1 net acres 48.71 acres
The net developable acreage is based on the Metropolitan Council’s formula for calculation of
net residential density calculated by the gross acres less wetlands, buffers, public parks and open
space, arterial road rights-of-way, and floodplains. The resulting density of the proposed PUD
Development Plan is as follows:
Proposed
Net Developable Dwelling Units Density
Northerly Site 27.41 acres 76 proposed 2.80 units/acre
Southerly Site 21.3 acres 74 proposed 3.47 units/acre
Project Total 48.71 acres 150 Units 3.08 units/acre
The proposed units within the Project will be allocated among single-family residences,
twinhomes, and row townhomes as follows:
Housing Types
Acres Number
Single-Family Residences 16.6 acres 42 Units
Twinhomes 27.41 acres 76 Units
Row Townhomes 4.7 acres 32 Units
Project Total 48.71 acres 150 Units
The Project will also include the improvement of Chippewa Road from Mohawk Drive on the
west to Arrowhead Drive on the east, as well as the completion of a water loop connected to the
City’s municipal water system.
Land Use Applications
MOE is seeking approval of the following zoning and subdivision applications:
1. Rezoning: Planned Unit Development
The predominant zoning district for the Properties is Rural Residential-Urban Reserve (RR-UR),
with approximately 5.25 acres of the southernmost portion of the Southerly Site zoned as
Commercial-Highway (CH). MOE is seeking a rezoning of both Properties to the Planned Unit
Development (PUD), along with review and approval of the Preliminary Plat and PUD
Development Plan. The PUD District will allow for the flexible application of the City’s Zoning
Code (“City Code”) while allowing for higher standards of site and building design, along with
the preservation of high-quality natural resources located on the Properties.
Dusty Finke AICP
November 6, 2020
Page 3
The applications are consistent the Comp Plan amendments which were recently approved by the
Met Council and subject to conditions adopted by the City Council. The Comp plan amendment
moved staging of development from 2025 to 2020 on the Northerly Site. On the Southerly Site,
the Comp Plan designation was changed from Business to Mixed Residential (MR) designation
to accommodate the proposed mix of residential development and staging of the Properties. The
overall density will be 3.08 units per acre over the entire Project, with higher density located on
the Southerly Site.
On the Northerly Site, the underlying zoning requested with the PUD is R2. The R2 zoning
district is consistent with the Low Density Residential (LDR) land use guiding and allows
clustering of smaller lots to support protection and enhancement of natural areas through the
preservation of open space, wetlands, and woodlands, as well as buffering from adjacent streets
and uses, or the creation of additional recreational opportunities.
R2 Proposed
Twinhomes
Minimum Lot Size (Two-family) 5,000 s.f. per unit 3,948 to 5,500 s.f.
Minimum Lot Width (two-family) 50 feet 42 feet
Minimum Lot Depth 90 feet 94 feet
Front Yard Setback 25 feet 25 feet to curb (equiv. to
13 foot to right-of-way)
Front Yard Setback (garage) 30 feet 25 feet to curb (equiv. to
13 foot to right-of-way)
Side Yard Setback (two-family) 10 feet 30 feet between buildings
Side Yard (corner) 25 feet 25 feet
Rear Yard Setback 25 feet 30 feet
Max. Hardcover 50% 66.4% maximum, not
including open space
between lots
On the Southerly Site, the underlying zoning requested with the PUD is R3 for the townhomes.
The R3 zoning district is consistent with Medium Density Residential (MDR) land use guiding
and allows for development of townhome portion of the Project. The underlying zoning
requested with the PUD is R2 for the single-family homes. The R2 zoning district is consistent
with Low Density Residential (LDR) land use guiding and allows for development of single-
family portion of the Project
Dusty Finke AICP
November 6, 2020
Page 4
R2 Proposed
Single Family
Minimum Lot Size 8,000 s.f. 9,738 to 17,058
s.f.
Minimum Lot Width 60 feet 70 feet
Minimum Lot Depth 90 feet 130 feet
Front Yard Setback 25 feet 30 feet
Front Yard Setback (garage) 30 feet 30 feet
Side Yard Setback (combined) 15 feet (10 & 5) 20 feet (10 & 10)
Side Yard (corner) 25 feet 30 feet
Rear Yard Setback 25 feet 30 feet
Collector Setback 40 feet 50 feet
Max. Hardcover 50% 34% maximum
R3 Requirement Proposed
Townhomes
Minimum Net Area per Unit 7,920 s.f. not
including reductions
6,472 s.f.
Maximum Net Area per Unit 8,700 s.f. 6,472 s.f.
Minimum Setback from Perimeter 20 feet 40 feet
Local Road Setback 40 feet 40 feet
Collector Road Setback (Chippewa) 50 feet 40 feet
Private Road Setback 25 feet 23 to 26 feet to
curb
Minimum Distance Between
Buildings
30 feet 25 feet
Max. Hardcover 50% 30.5% for the
total area
2. Consistency with PUD Criteria
The Project is consistent with the standards and purpose of the City’s PUD Ordinance under
Section 827.25 as follows:
a. Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all
styles of economic expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design,
and placement of structures and by the conservation and more efficient use
of land in such developments.
The Project is designed to accommodate a mix of housing types and densities while preserving
and protecting wetlands, tree stands and open spaces. The Project includes a combined 73.75
acres of wetland and buffer conservation areas, as well as a combined 7.17 acres of wooded open
space or parks. The 5.1-acre park and adjacent open space on the Southerly Site includes over
300 hardwood trees. The park area will become a neighborhood asset providing open space and
Dusty Finke AICP
November 6, 2020
Page 5
trail facilities for use by the residents of the development and the general public. This protects
and preserves one of the City’s natural resources.
b. Higher standards of site and building design.
The PUD allows the Project to provide a variety of high-quality housing styles, including single
family lots, twinhomes and row townhomes in a high-quality design, integrated into the open
space and wetlands. The single-family homes will be located adjacent to natural areas, including
wetlands, park and open space, and preserved woodlands. The townhomes have high-end
features and the exteriors will use an extensive amount of glass creating an abundance of natural
light on three sides. Deep garages will provide homeowners room to store trash and recycling
bins indoors. To improve exteriors, the Applicant has hired a designer to create a variety of
architectural features to enhance the front of the building units. The addition of the row homes
in the northwest quadrant of the Southerly Site provides a housing option for newer families in
proximity to the park and open space.
c. The preservation, enhancement, or restoration of desirable site
characteristics such as high-quality natural resources, wooded areas,
wetlands, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil
erosion.
To the north on the Northerly Site, more than two-thirds of the site will be preserved as wetlands
and woodlands providing natural buffer areas within the development. All of the proposed
residences on the Northerly Site are clustered on the west of the property, which provides more
than a 1,300-foot buffer between the Bridgewater neighborhood and the nearest home in the
development. To the south on the Southerly Site, nearly sixty percent (60%) of the site is
preserved in wetlands, woodlands, park and open space. Specifically, the developer will
dedicate a 5.1-acre park with adjacent open space area preserving the existing wooded area
including over 300 hardwood trees. This preservation effort will become a defining feature of
the development and will preserve one of the City’s finest natural resources.
d. Innovative approaches to stormwater management and low-impact
development practices which result in volume control and improvement to
water quality beyond the standard requirements of the City.
The Development Plan shows several ponding areas designed to manage storm water and
minimize storm water impacts from the development. MOE will work with the City to
incorporate low impact development and best practices throughout the development. For
instance, the plan proposes construction of stormwater reservoirs to provide irrigation to
landscaping on the Northerly Site.
e. Maintenance of open space in portions of the development site, preferably
linked to surrounding open space areas, and also enhanced buffering from
adjacent roadways and lower intensity uses.
Dusty Finke AICP
November 6, 2020
Page 6
The Project preserves and enhances wetland and woodland areas creating large buffers to
surrounding development and large portions of the Properties will be dedicated as parkland and
open space. MOE will work with the City to enhance buffering from adjacent roadways and
lower intensity uses. For instance, heavy landscaping and tree planting along Mohawk Road will
provide a buffer to roadways.
f. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a
phased and orderly development and use pattern and more convenience in
location and design of development and service facilities.
The Project is the result of a creative use of land that allows the placement of a variety of home
sites on the Properties in a way that preserves wetlands, woodlands, and open space while still
meeting the required density contained within the City’s land use regulatory documents. The
Project ranges in density with the higher density located nearest to the corner of Mohawk Drive
and Chippewa Road. The overall net density in the Project is 3.2 units per acre, which is
consistent with both City and Metropolitan Council guidance for new residential development.
g. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets
thereby lower development costs and public investments.
MOE has designed the PUD to maximize the use of developable land while preserving natural
features such as wetlands, woodlands, and upland buffers to nearby development. On both
Properties, the footprint and density of housing maximized in a manner that reduces the
impervious surfaces and reduces the in the size and length of infrastructure serving the
development. In addition, the Applicant has planned construction of new infrastructure,
including the extension of Chippewa Road between Mohawk Drive and Arrowhead Road, as
well as the water loop which will serve surrounding neighborhoods and reduce the City’s need
for public investment in infrastructure.
h. A development pattern that effectuates the objectives of the Medina
Comprehensive Plan. (PUD is not intended to vary applicable planning and
zoning principles.)
Met Council and the City have approved a Comp Plan amendment that allows for the concurrent
development of both the Northerly and Southerly Sites as a single residential PUD offering a
variety of housing types and densities, while preserving natural and opens spaces. Preserving the
wetlands, buffers, open space, and tree stands is consistent with the Comp Plan, and extending
Chippewa Road and the water loop will further the Comp Plan’s infrastructure goals. The Project
will effectuate the objectives of the Comp Plan as proposed.
i. A more desirable and creative environment than might be possible through
the strict application on zoning and subdivision regulations of the City.
The use of the PUD not only results in a more desirable and creative environment but is essential
to approval of the plan as proposed and permits a mix of densities while preserving natural and
opens spaces. The Project provides several public benefits, including the preservation of
Dusty Finke AICP
November 6, 2020
Page 7
woodlands, wetlands, and open spaces and a reduction in impervious surface as discussed above,
along with the extension of Chippewa Road and the water loop.
3. Public Benefit
In conjunction with the City Council’s review of the PUD Concept Plan on March 17, 2020, the
Developer proposed significant and specific public benefit as follows:
a. Park Dedication
(1) The Developer will dedicate a 5.1-acre park and adjacent open space
which includes the wooded knoll on the Southerly Site.
(2) The Developer will construct a paved trail segment through the park
which is accessible. The estimated cost for the trail is $110,000.
(3) The Developer will provide an 8-foot wide bituminous trail from the park
entrance to Mohawk Road, then along Mohawk Road up to Chippewa
Road. The cost of the trail is $71,000, not including the value of the right-
of-way.
(4) The Developer will provide an 8-foot wide bituminous trail along the new
Chippewa Road, from Mohawk Road to Arrowhead Road. This cost of
the trail is estimated at $150,000. With staff input, the trail may be
constructed over the existing Chippewa Road right-of-way to allow for
water control between the north and south basins.
(5) The Developer will provide an internal 8-foot wide bituminous trail from
the twin homes on the Northerly Site to the new Chippewa Road. The
estimated cost of this improvement is $18,000.
b. Street Dedication and Construction
(1) The Developer will dedicate an 80-foot wide easement from Mohawk
Road to Arrowhead Road for the construction of Chippewa Road. The
estimated value of the right-of-way is $220,000. (Note: The Project will
require reduced setbacks for the lots on either side of Chippewa Road for
the dedication of right-of-way.)
(2) The Developer will construct and pay for the extension of Chippewa Road
from Mohawk Road to Arrowhead Road. We will agree that it will be
constructed as a rural street section, except in locations where it is
beneficial to construct an urban section for mitigation of floodplain
impacts. This construction includes a box culvert under the roadway to
provide for stormwater flows north and south of the roadway. The
estimated cost of construction of the roadway is $2,500,000.
Dusty Finke AICP
November 6, 2020
Page 8
(3) The Developer will construct the sweep connection between Chippewa
Road and Arrowhead Road, provided the City acquires the right-of-way
from OSI. The Developer will grade the right-of-way and complete that
section of roadway.
(4) The Developer will install a 12” watermain from Mohawk Road to
Arrowhead Road. The estimated cost of this project is $460,000.
(5) At the City’s election, the Developer will also contribute to wetland
mitigation in exchange for an equal reduction in connection fees for the
twin home project proposed on the Northerly Site.
(6) The Developer will provide 3.5 to 4 acres of land needed for floodplain
mitigation. The estimated value of the acreage is $395,000. In addition,
the Developer will excavate the floodplain mitigation area to a depth and
dimension provided by the City.
(7) The Developer will oversize stormwater ponds within the Project to meet
the stormwater requirements for Chippewa Road. If the City and the
Developer agree that the most efficient way to manage and treat
stormwater for the Chippewa Road project would be to capture and treat
stormwater from Mohawk Road, then the Developer will construct and
pay the cost of the oversized ponds.
We look forward to working with City staff, the Park Commission, Planning Commission and
the City Council on moving these applications and the Project forward. Please contact me with
any questions about the above narrative or the enclosed materials.
Sincerely,
William C. Griffith, for
Larkin Hoffman
Direct Dial: 952-896-3290
Direct Fax: 952-842-1729
Email: wgriffith@larkinhoffman.com
cc: Mark Smith
4852-7782-4204, v. 5
TWINHOMES
Weston Woods Townhomes are spacious, bright, open, and airy with extensive use of
glass in every home creating an abundance of natural light. The design is timeless but
practical with expansive soaring vaults, gourmet kitchens, and a cozy 4 season porch.
The exteriors will feature a variety of defining features and including a side porch
entry, a kitchen garden window, and changing roof lines and bay windows that make
them intriguing and inviting. The exterior facades will feature a variety of finishes,
textures, and features like shake siding and cultured stone on no less than 25% of the
street facing exterior. The rear of the homes will be enhanced by a gable roof that
covers our 4 season porch.. Our homes look and live like single family homes. Most
of these homes will have lower levels that will overlook the vast open space wetlands.
These homes range in size from 2,600 to 3,300 square feet.
ROW TOWNHOME
Like twin homes these homes will feature interesting architecture and design featuring
multiple products that will make them interesting and unique on no less than 25% of
the street facing exterior. The homes will also have varied roof lines and extra roof
features to make the home have their own identity and feel. These homes feature 3
and 4 bedrooms with anywhere from 1,800 to 2,300 square feet.
SINGLE Family
The single family homes will meet or exceed all City requirements. They will
feature interesting and unique facades, roof lines, window features, and accents
that will cover well over 25% of the face of the building. The features will include
stone, shakes, brick, and concrete type siding. Plans will be architecturally
approved prior to building. Efforts will be made to modify rear rooflines or
exteriors to enhance the rear façade.
CABX
995.2
994.8
994.5994.2
994.0
993.8
993.8
994.1
OE
OE
OE
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>
I
WE
T
L
A
N
D
2
S0
0
°
2
0
'
4
4
"
E
2
6
4
0
.
4
8
33 33
3333
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
WL 3
WE
T
L
A
N
D
WE
T
L
A
N
D
5
b
ST-11
EL=997.4
ST-14
EL=988.3
15
16
17
18
OUTLOT B
7
8 9
19 20 21 22 23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
CHIPPEWA
MO
H
A
W
K
D
R
I
V
E
33 BLK 8
BR
O
O
K
V
I
E
W
C
O
U
R
T
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
40'
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
BR
O
O
K
V
I
E
W
LA
N
E
R =96.0
R=6 9.0
R
=
3
6
.
0
R
=
6
0
.
0
R =96.0
FI
R
E
LA
N
E
251.15
12
/
7
/
2
0
2
0
3
:
4
4
:
2
0
P
M
,
1
:
6
0
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
NORTH
NO SCALE
AREA LOCATION MAP
SITE
HORSESHOE TRAIL
RO
L
L
I
N
G
H
I
L
L
S
R
D
.
ABBREVIATIONS
MODULAR RETAINING WALL
FIELDSTONE RETAINING WALL
NEW
CATV UNDERGROUND CABLE/TV
EXISTING DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
STORM SEWER
WATERMAIN
FORCE MAIN
SANITARY SEWER-WASTE
ROOF DRAIN SYSTEM
GAS LINE-UNDERGROUND
FIRE LINE (IF SEPARATE)
FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION
SOIL SUBDRAIN
TELEPHONE-UNDERGROUND
ELECTRIC-UNDERGROUND
LAWN SPRINKLER SLEEVE
>
>
>>
RIPRAP
>>
FM
STS
RD
GATE VALVE
WTR
SAN
BLDG.
FIRE
GAS
HYD
TELE
ELEC
X"SSD
LSS
C.O.
MAJOR CONTOUR
BUILDING
SPOT ELEVATION
120
CONCRETE
SLOPE DIRECTION
CONCRETE CURB
GUARD RAIL
FENCING
CONCRETE RETAINING WALL
HEIGHT, TYPE
POWER POLE
LIGHT STANDARD
EXIT LOCATION
UNDERGROUND STRUCTURE
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
BOLLARD
CANOPY/OVERHANG
BIT. EDGE
FES
CATCH BASIN
MANHOLE
SYMBOLS
LANDSCAPING
GRAVEL
FLAG POLE
>
>>
POWERPOLE
GUARD POST
GAS METER
TREES
TRAFFIC SIGN
WATER MAIN
SANITARY SEWER LINE
STORM SEWER LINE
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
MAJOR CONTOUR
SPOT ELEVATION
CONCRETE
BUILDING
CANOPY / OVERHANG
120
GM
12"STS
8"SAN
LT
FENCING
CONCRETE CURB
RETAINING WALL
OE
MANHOLE
WATER VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
FLARED END SECTION
CATCH BASIN
6"WTR
XX
HEIGHT, TYPE
1 NOTE NUMBER
GUY WIRE
IRON MONUMENT FOUND
WATER SHUT-OFF VALVE
l l
MEASURED DISTANCE
DISTANCE PER RECORDED PLAT
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONEUT
UNDERGROUND ELECTRICUE
GAS LINEG
PAVING BLOCK
PAVING BLOCK
SET 1/2" X 14" IRON PIPE
TRANSFORMER
TREE LINE
MB
MAILBOX
SURVEY DISK (BENCHMARK)
WSO
BITUMINOUS
SOIL BORING
B-X
123.45
%1.00
234.5
LIGHT POLE
MINOR CONTOUR123MINOR CONTOUR123
SILT FENCE
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
REVISED AREA (THIS ISSUE)
REVISION - ADDENDUM, BULLETIN, ETC.
NOTE REFERENCE
LARGE SHEET DETAIL
COORDINATE POINT
PARKING STALL COUNT
DESCRIPTIONSYMBOL
EROSION CONTROL SYMBOLS
DRAWING SYMBOLS
n n n
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BENCHMARK
INLET PROTECTION
C21
C7.3
1
12
2
GSID Station # 10300 USGS Quad: HAMEL County: HENNEPIN, MN Mn/DOT Name: 2722 T Stamping: 2722 T 1977
Monument Type: SURVEY DISK Disk Type: ALUMINUM ALLOY ROD (NO SLEEVE) (DEPTH 8 FT)
Directions:
2.5 MILES WEST OF HAMEL, 2.4 MILES WEST ALONG TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 FROM THE JUNCTION OF TRUNK HIGHWAY 55
AND COUNTY ROAD 101 IN HAMEL, AT TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 MILEPOINT 174, 73.0 FEET NORTH OF TRUNK HIGHWAY 55,
166.0 FEET EAST OF MOHAWK DRIVE, 27.0 FEET SOUTHWEST OF A POWER POLE WITH GUY WIRE, 26.0 FEET SOUTH OF A
FENCE LINE, 1.0 FOOT SOUTH OF A WITNESS POST.
That part of the South Half of Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying
Northwesterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 01 degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds
East on an assumed bearing along the east line of South half a distance of 833.09 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be
described; thence South 22 degrees 09 minutes 09 seconds West a distance of 86.32 feet; thence Southerly 173. 73 feet along a
tangential curve concave southeasterly, having a central angle of 11 degrees 25 minutes 46 seconds and a radius of 870. 89 feet;
thence South 10 degrees 43 minutes 23 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 534.34 feet; thence southerly 29. 99 feet
along a tangential curve concave easterly, having a central angle of 10 degrees 06 minutes 25 seconds and a radius of 170.1 feet;
thence South 00 degrees 36 minutes 58 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 30.00 feet to the south line of said South
Half and said line there terminating.
Abstract property
AND
Parcel1:
The Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23, except the West 468
feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 2:
That part of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter lying West of a line extending from the Southwest
corner of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter to a point on the North line of the Northeast quarter of the
Southeast quarter 660 feet West along said North line from the Northeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the
Southeast quarter, all in Section 3, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property.
Parcel 3:
Outlot B, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Abstract property
Parcel 4:
The North 468 feet of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township
118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 5:
The West 468 feet of the South 590 feet of the North 1058 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter
of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 6:
That part of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North,
Range 23, lying South of the North 1058 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
3
DESCRIPTIONSHEET NO.
CIVIL & LANDSCAPE TITLE SHEET
PRELIMINARY PLAT - NORTH
PRELIMINARY PLAT - SOUTH
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SITE PLAN - NORTH
SITE PLAN - SOUTH
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION
CONTROL-ENLARGED DETAILS
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION
CONTROL-ENLARGED DETAILS
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION
CONTROL-ENLARGED DETAILS
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION
CONTROL-ENLARGED DETAILS
MN SWPPP NOTES
UTILITIES - NORTH
UTILITIES - SOUTH
VEHICLE TRACKING-NORTH
VEHICLE TRACKING-SOUTH
LINE/CURVE TABLES-NORTH
LINE/CURVE TABLES-SOUTH
STREET PROFILES
STREET PROFILES
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAILS
OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAILS
TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
LANDSCAPE-OVERALL
LANDSCAPE-NORTH
LANDSCAPE-SOUTH
LANDSCAPE DETAILS
CERTIFICATIONS
CIVIL / LANDSCAPE SHEET INDEX & REVISION MATRIX
OWNER
C0.1
C0.2
C0-3
C1.1
C2.1
C2.2
C3.0
C3.1
C3.2
C3.3
C3.4
C3.5
C3.6
C3.7
C3.8
C3.9
C3.10
C3.11
C3.12
C4.1
C4.2
C6.1
C6.2
C6.3
C6.4
C6.5
C6.6
C7.1
C7.2
C7.3
C7.4
C7.5
L1.1
L1.2
L1.3
L1.4
L2.1
L2.2
L2.3
L7.1
PROJECT CONTACTS
09
.
2
8
.
2
0
10
.
2
7
.
2
0
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
11
.
1
1
.
2
0
12
.
0
3
.
2
0
SHEETS ISSUED BY DATE
COMPOST/BIO LOG))))))))))))))))))))
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CERTIFICATION IS FOR ALL SHEETS WITH NUMBERS BEGINNING WITH THE LETTER "C".
RANDALL C HEDLUND, P.E.
LICENSE NUMBER:DATE:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
CERTIFICATION IS FOR ALL SHEETS WITH NUMBERS BEGINNING WITH THE LETTER "L".
JOSHUA K. POPEHN, L.L.A.
LICENSE NUMBER:DATE:
19576 03 DEC 2020
44803 03 DEC 2020
D Angle
&And
@ At
100 YR.100 Year Flood Elevation
A.B.Anchor Bolt
A.D.Area Drain
A/C Air Conditioning Unit
ADD.Addendum
ADDL.Additional
ADJ.Adjacent / Adjust
AHU Air Handling Unit
ALT.Alternate
ALUM.Aluminum
ANOD.Anodized
APPROX.Approximate
ARCH Architect / Architectural
AUTO.Automatic
AVG.Average
B.C.Back of Curb
B/W Bottom of Wall
BFE Basement Floor Elevation
BIT Bituminous (Asphaltic)
BLDG Building
BM Benchmark
BSMT.Basement
C.F.Cubic Feet
C.F.S.Cubic Feet Per Second
C.G.Corner Guard
C.J.Control Joint
C.L.Centerline
C.M.U.Concrete Masonry Unit
C.O.Cleanout
C.O.E.U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers
C.Y.Cubic Yards
CB Catch Basin
CBMH Catch Basin Manhole
CEM.Cement
CIP Cast Iron Pipe
CMP Corrugated Metal Pipe
CONC.Concrete (Portland)
CONN.Connection
CONST.Construction
CONT.Continuous
CONTR.Contractor
COP.Copper
CU.Cubic
D.S.Down Spout
DEG.Degree
DEMO.Demolition / Demolish
DEPT.Department
DET.Detail
DIA.Diameter
DIAG.Diagonal
DIM.Dimension
DIP Ductile Iron Pipe
DN Down
DWG.Drawing
E.East
E.J.Expansion Joint
E.O.Emergency Overflow
E.O.S.Emergency Overflow Swale
E.W.Each Way
EA.Each EL.Elevation
ELEC.Electrical
ELEV.Elevation
EMER.Emergency
ENGR.Engineer
ENTR.Entrance
EQ.Equal
EQUIP.Equipment
EQUIV.Equivalent
EXIST.Existing
EXP.Expansion
F & I Furnish and Install
F.B.O.Furnished by Others
F.C.Face of Curb
F.D.Floor Drain
F.D.C.Fire Department Connection
F.V.Field Verify
FB Full Basement
FBWO Full Basement Walk Out
FBLO Full Basement Look Out
FDN.Foundation
FES Flared End Section
FFE Finished Floor Elevation
FLR.Floor
FT. OR (')Foot
FUT.Future
G.B.Grade Break
G.C.General Contractor
GAL.Gallon
GALV.Galvanized
GFE Garage Floor Elevation
GL.Glass
GR.Grade
H.Height
H.P.High Point
HDPEP High Density Polyethylene Pipe
HGT.Height
HORIZ.Horizontal
HVAC Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning
HYD Hydrant
I.D.Inside Dimension OR Identification
I.E. or IE Invert Elevation
IN. OR (")Inches
INFO.Information
INL.Inlet Elevation
INSUL.Insulation
INV.Invert Elevation
JT.Joint
L.F.Linear Feet
L.P.Low Point / Liquid Petroleum
LB.Pound
LGU Local Government Unit
LB.Pound
LB.Longitudinal
LT.Light / Lighting
MAINT.Maintenance
MAS.Masonry
MATL.Material
MAX.Maximum
MECH Mechanical
MED.Medium
MFR.Manufacturer
MH Manhole
MIN.Minimum / Minute
MISC.Miscellaneous
MNDOT Minnesota Department Of Transportation
MOD.Module / Modular
MUL.Mullion
N.North
N.I.C.Not In Contract
NO. OR #Number
NOM Nominal
NTS Not to Scale
NWE Normal Water Elevation
NWL Normal Water Level
O.F.On Center
O.G.Outside Dimension
O.H.Overhead Electric
OH.Overhead
OHWL Ordinary High Water Level
OPNG.Opening
ORIG.Original
P.C.Point of Curvature
P.I.Point of Intersection
PIV Post Indicator Valve
P.L. OR P/L Property Line
P.O.B.Point of Beginning
P.S.F.Pounds Per Square Foot
P.S.I.Pounds Per Square Inch
P.T.Point of Tangency
P.V.C.Point of Vertical Curvature
P.V.I.Point of Vertical Intersection
P.V.T.Point of Vertical Tangency
PE Polyethylene
PED.Pedestal / Pedestrian
PERF.Perforated
PREP.Preparation
PROJ.Project
PROP.Proposed
PVC Poly-Vinyl-Chloride (Piping)
PVMT.Pavement
QTR.Quarter
QTY.Quantity
R Radius
RAD.Radius
RE Rim Elevation (Casting)
R.D.Roof Drain
R.E.Remove Existing
R.O.Rough Opening
R.P.Radius Point
RC Reinforced Concrete Pipe
R.S.Rough Slab
RSD Roof Storm Drain
RE.Regarding
REINF.Reinforced
REQ'D Required
REV.Revision / Revised
RGU Regulatory Government Unit
ROW OR R/W Right of Way
S.South
S.F.Square Feet
SAN.Sanitary Sewer
SECT.Section
SE Split Entry /Side Exit
SEWO Split Entry Walk Out /Side Exit Walk Out
SHT.Sheet
SIM.Similar
SLNT.Sealant
SPEC.Specification
SQ.Square
SSD Subsurface drain
STMH Storm Sewer Manhole
STD.Standard
STRUCT.Structural
SYM.Symmetrical
T Thickness
T/R Top of Rim
T/W Top of Wall
TEMP.Temporary
THK.Thick / Thickness
T.J.Tooled Joint
TNH Top Nut Hydrant
TYP.Typical
U.N.O.Unless Noted Otherwise
V.B.Vapor Barrier
V.C.Vertical Curve
V.I.F.Verify In Field
VER.Verify
VER.Vertical
VEST.Vestibule
W Width
W.PT.Working Point
W.W.F.Welded Wire Fabric
W/With
W/O Without
WO Walk Out
VER.Wetland
WP Waterproof
WETL.Weight
YD.Yard
YR.Year
UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTICFO
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
10
50
55
MO
H
A
W
K
RO
A
D
HACKMORE RD.
B
A
S
S
LA
K
E
RD
.
HAMEL ROAD
PI
N
T
O
D
R
.
S
E
T
T
L
E
R
S
R
D
.
OL
D
AR
R
O
W
H
E
A
D
D
R
I
V
E
55
101
19
116
47
115
C001MEH003.dwg
CIVIL & LANDSCAPE
TITLE SHEET
C0.1
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
CONTACT: MARK SMITH
LANDFORM
105 SOUTH FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 513
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
TEL 612-252-9070
FAX 612-252-9077
CONTACT: RANDY HEDLUND
CIVIL ENGINEER
LANDFORM
105 SOUTH FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 513
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
TEL 612-252-9070
FAX 612-252-9077
CONTACT: LYNN CASWELL
SURVEYOR
X X XX
X X XX
X XX
X XX
X X
X X
X X XX
X X XX
X X XX
X X XX
X X XX
X X X
X XX
X XX
X XX
X XX
X
DR
I
V
E
CHIPPEWA
ROAD
WI
L
L
O
W
X
X X XX
X X XX
X X XX
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X XX
X X XX
X X XX
X X XX
X X XX
X
X
PID: 0211823320012
4250 ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
PID: 0211823320008
4200 ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
CABX
INV=990.15
FES 15 RCP
INV=990.82
FES 15 RCP
CABX
CB RECT
RE=991.1
CABX
EM
EM
CABX
CABX
C
A
B
X
CA
B
X
GAS
5109
51105111
W
SSMH
RE=1005.5
IE=974.93
SSMH
RE=996.8
IE=975.43
SSMH
RE=989.8
IE=976.44
INV=984.36
INV 27 RCP
SSMH
RE=988.8
IE=977.27
SSMH
RE=992.6
IE=978.44
INV=984.16
FES 18IN RCP
CBMH CL
RE=992.2
INV=990.14
FES 15IN RCP
UE
UE
OE
OE
OE
OE
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
>
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EX. MH 4A
RIM:982.74
INV:979.88(N)
INV:979.88(E)
INV:979.78(S)
28' L 8" PVC
SDR 26 @ 0.4%
STUB 4C
INV:979.88
EX. MH 3
RIM:990.71
INV:979.25(N)
INV:979.25(W)
INV:979.25(E)
INV:979.15(S)
28' L 8" PVC
SDR 26 @ 0.4%
STUB 4C
INV:979.36
EX. MH 2
RIM:987.30
INV:978.20(N)
INV:978.20(E)
INV:978.10(S)
EX. MH 1
RIM:986.42
INV:977.20(N)
INV:977.20(E)
INV:977.10(S)
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:992.55
INV:976.35
29' L 8" PVC
SDR 26 @ 0.4%
STUB 4C
INV:977.32
29' L 8" PVC
SDR 26 @ 0.4%
STUB 4C
INV:978.31
I
WE
T
L
A
N
D
2
DNR WETLAND 27-493W
SOUTH PORTION
OHW = 980.6
FLOODPLAIN = 981.5
( As of 8/10/20)
7 8 9 10 11 1213
15
65
66
67
68
69
70
72
75
76
77
78
7980
8182
83
84
101
105106
107
108
109 110111
112113114115116117118119
120121122
123
124
125126127 128129
158159
160161162
174175176
177
178179
180181
182
185
208
209210211
212
213 214
215
232
17
0
33
33
33
33 33
3333
3333
33
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
e
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
d
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
b
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
g
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:995.01
INL: 982.81 (W)
INV: 974.76 (N)(S)
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3
NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3
468.00
46
8
.
0
0
59
0
.
0
0
S. LINE OF THE N. 1058 FT. OF THE
NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 3
80 LF.
6" PVC
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:984.80
INV:973.56
EX. 6" DIP
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
EX
.
1
0
"
P
V
C
EX
.
1
0
"
P
V
C
EX
.
1
0
"
P
V
C
EX
.
1
0
"
P
V
C
DNR WETLAND 27-493W
NORTH PORTION
OHW = 978.3
FLOODPLAIN = 979.2
( As of 8/10/20)
980.6
980.
6
980.
6
980.
6
980.
6
980.
6
980
.
6
98
0
.
6
980.6
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1c
WL 1e-1
WL 3
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1f
WE
T
L
A
N
D
4
WE
T
L
A
N
D
5
b
WL
5a
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1a
-
N
o
r
t
h
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1a
-
S
o
u
t
h
WL
1d-1
WL
1d
-
2
WL 1h
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:985.09
INV:972.26
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:985.81
INL:970.64
INV:969.33
408409
435437442
454455
456
463
486487
498499
500 501502503
504
505
506
515516517
518 525
531
536
537 538539
544 545
552
576
592593
INV=990.47
FES 15 IN PVC
INV=990.09
FES RCP 15 IN
RE=992.02
STMH
RE=999.94
IE=973.16
SSMH
RE=1001.97
IE=973.78
SSMH
MB
1
2
3
4
5
6
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
222324
2526
27
28
2930
31
32
33
343536
3738
394041
42
43
44454647
48
495051
52
53
54
55
56
5758
59606162
63
64
71
7374
8586
87
88
8990
91 92
93
94
9596
9798
99
100
102
103104
130
131132
133
134
135136
137 138
139
140 141
142
143144
145
146
147148149
150
151152153154155156157
163164165
166 167
168169
170171
172173
183184
186187188
189 190191192193194195 196197 198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
216
217218219
220 221222223 224
225 226
227
228 229230 231
233234235
236
237238239240
241
242
243
244
245246247
248249
250251
252253254255256257
258
259
260 261262
263
264
265
266267
268
269
270
271
272
273274275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282283
284
285
286
287 288
289
290
291
292
293
294295 296297
298
299
300
301302
303
304
305
306
307308
309310
311
312313
314
315
316317
318
319
320321322323
324 325
326
327328329330331332333
334
335336
337338339
340
341342
343
344345
346 347
348349350
351
352353 354
355356
357358
359 360361362
363364365
366367368369
370
371372373374
375
376
377
378379
380381382
383384
385
386
387388
389
390
401 402
403404
405
406
407
410
411412413
414415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423424
425
426
427428429430
431
432
433434
436438439440441
443444
445446447
448
449
450451
452453
457458
459460
461
462
464465
466
467 468
469470
471
472473
474475476
477
478 479
480
481482
483
484485
488489490491492493494495
496497
507508
509510511
512513514
519520521
522
523 524
526 527
528
529
530
532533
534535
540
541
542
543
546
547
548
549
550
551 553
554555 556557
558
559
560561
562
563
564
565566567568569
570 571
572573574
575
577
578
579
580581582583584585586
587588589
590
591
594 595596
597
598599 600
601
602
603604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616617
618
619620
621
622623624625626
627
628
>
>
10
"
P
V
C
8"
P
V
C
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10
"
P
V
C
8"
P
V
C
8" PVC
8" PVC 8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
>
10
"
P
V
C
8"
P
V
C
70369
700067000770008
7000970010
7001170012
70013700147001570016
70017 70018
7001970020
70021
7002270023
70024
70025
7002670027
70028
70029
7003070031
70032
7003370034
70035
70036
700377003870039
70040
7004170042
70043
70044
7004570046
70047 70048
70049
7005070051700527005370054
7005570056
7006170062
7006370064
70065
7006670067700687006970070
70071
70072
70073
7007470075
70076700777007870079
70080
70081700827008370084
7008570086
70087
70088 7008970090
7009170092
70093
7009470095700967009770098
7009970100
70101 70102
70103
70104
70105701067010770108
70109
7011070111
7011270113
70114
70115
70116
70117
70118
70119
70120
70121701227012370124
70125
70126
70127
7012870129
70130
701317013270133
70136
701377013870139
7014070141
70142
70143
70144
7014570146
70147
70148
70149
70150701517015270153 70154
70155
70156
70157
7015870159
7016070161701627016370164
70165
70166
7016770168
70169
7017070171
7017270173
70174
70175
70176
70177
70178
70179
70180
7018170182
7018370184
70185
7018670187
70188
70189
7019070191
701927019370194
701957019670197 7019870199
70200 7020170202 70205
70206
7020770208
70209
7021070211
70212
70213
7021470215
70216
70217
70218702197022070221
7022270223
70224
7022570226
7022770228
70229
70230
70232
70233
70234
7023570236
70237 70238
70239
7024070241
7024270243
70244
70245
70246
70247
70248
70249
70250
70251
70252702537025470255
70256
70257
7025870259
70260
70264
70265
702667026770268
70269
70271
70272
70273702747027570276
70277
702787027970280702817028270283
702847028570286
7028770288
70289
7029070291
70292702937029470295
7029670297
70298
70299
70300
70301
70302
70303
70304
70305
703067030770308
7030970310
70311
70312
7031370314 70315
703167031770318
70319
70320
70321
70322
70323
7032470325703267032770328
70329
70330
703317033270333
703347033570336
7033770338
7033970340
7034170342
70343
70344
7034570346
70347
703487034970350
70351
7035270353
70354
70355
70358
7036070363
7036470365703667036770368
7037070371
70372
70373
7037470375
70376
70377
70378
70379
7038070381703827038370384
7038570386
70387
70388
70389
7039070391
7039270393
703947039570396703977039870399
70400
70401
7040270403
7040470405
7040670407
70408
70409
70410
70411
704127041370415
70416
70417
70418
70419
70420704217042270423
7042470425
70426
70427 704287042970430
70431
70433
70434
70435
7043670437
70438
70439
70440
704417044270443
70444
7044570446
70447
70448
7044970450
70451
70452
70453
70454
70455
70456
70457
7045870459
70460
7046170462
7046370464
7046570466
70467
70468
7046970470704717047270473
70474
70475
7047670477
7047870479
70483
7048470485
704867048770488
70489
70490
70491
70492
70493
70494
704957049670497
70498
7049970500705017050270503
70504
70505
7050670507
70508705097051070511
7051270513
7051470515
70516
7051770518
70519
70520
70521
70522
70523
70524
70525
70526
70527
70528
7052970530
70531
70532
70533
70534
70538
70539705407054170542
70543
70544
70545
70546
70547
70548
705497055070551705527055370554
70555
7055670557
7055870559
705607056170562
70563
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811812813814815
816817
818819
820821
822823824
825826827
828
829
830
831832833
834
835836837838
839
840
841
842
843844845846847
848849850851
852853
854
855856857
858
859860
861862863864
865866867868
869
870
871
872
873
874 875
876877878
879
880881882883
884
885
886
887888889
890891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899900
901
902
903 904
905
906907908
909
910911912
913
914915
916
917918
919
920921
922
923
924
925926927928
929
930931
932
933934
935
936937938
939
940941942943
944
945946
947948949 950
951
952953
954955
956957958959
960961
962963964965
966
967968
969970971972
973
974975
976
977978 979
980
981
982
983984
985
986
987988989
990
991
992993
994
995996
997
998
999 1000
1001 10021003
1004100510061007
10081009
1010 101110121013
1014
10151016
10171018
1019102010211022
1023
1024
1025
1026102710281029103010311032103310341035103610371038
1039
1040
1041
1042
104310441045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050 1051 1052
10531054
1055
1056
1057
10581059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
10701071
1072
1073
1074
10751076
1077
107810791080
10811082
1083 10841085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
10911092
1093
109410951096
10971098
1099
11001101
1102 1103
1104
1105110611071108
11091110
1111 11121113 1114
1115111611171118
11191120112111221123
1124 1125
11261127
1128
1129113011311132
1133
1134
1135
113611371138113911401141
114211431144114511461147
11481149
1150
1151
11521153
115411551156
115711581159
1160
116111621163
11641165116611671168116911701171117211731174
1175
1176
11771178
1179118011811182118311841185
1186
11871188
118911901191
11921193
11941195
1196
1197
1198
11991200
1201
1202
12031204
1205
1206
1207
1208120912101211121212131214
121512161217
12181219
1220
122112221223
1224
12251226
1227
122812291230
12311232123312341235 1236123712381239
1240
12411242124312441245
12461247
1248
12491250
12511252
1253
12541255
1256
1257
12581259
1260 1261
12621263
126412651266
1267 1268 1269
12701271
1272
1273
1274 1275127612771278
1279128012811282
1283
1284
12851286
128712881289
1290
12911292
1293
12941295
12961297
12981299
13001301130213031304 1305
1306
13071308 1309
1310
13111312131313141315
13161317
1318
1319
132013211322
132313241325132613271328
132913301331
1332
1333
133413351336
13371338
13391340
1341
1342
1343 1344
13451346
13471348
1349
1350
13511352
1353
1354
1355
13561357
1358
13591360
1361
1362136313641365136613671368136913701371
1372137313741375
1376
1377
13781379
1380
1381
1382 1383
1384
1385
1386 13871388
1389
139013911392139313941395
13961397
1398
1399 1400
140114021403
140414051406140714081409
14101411141214131414
141514161417
14181419142014211422
1423
14241425
1426 1427
1428142914301431
1432
14331434
14351436
1437
143814391440 14411442
14431444
1445
144614471448144914501451
1452
145314541455
1456
1457
1458
14591460146114621463
1464 14651466
1467 14681469
14701471
147214731474
14751476
1477
14781479
1480
14811482
1483 14841485
1486
14871488
148914901491
1492
14931494
1495
1496149714981499
1500
1501150215031504150515061507 150815091510 1511
1512
EX. 6" PVC
4
10
12
12
N89°42'49"W 2676.18
N0
1
°
1
4
'
2
0
"
E
5
1
8
.
9
6
L=173.73
R=870.89
Δ=11°25'46"
S1
0
°
4
3
'
5
3
"
W
5
3
4
.
3
4
L=29.99
R=170.00
Δ=10°06'25"
30.02
S00°37'28"WS89°23'02"E 493.55
S2
6
°
3
3
'
2
1
"
W
1
4
6
8
.
0
9
S39
°
2
9
'
2
2
"
W
4
8
1
.
8
7
N88°39'29"W 332.51
N69°
5
8
'
2
0
"
W
2
0
1
.
5
5
N69°
5
8
'
2
0
"
W
4
8
3
.
4
8
5.00
N20°01'40"E
12
12
S0
0
°
2
0
'
4
4
"
E
2
6
4
0
.
4
8
Existing Road
Easement
ST-1
EL=990.6
ST-2
EL=990.4
ST-3
EL=987.4
ST-4
EL=983.8
ST-5
EL=982.2
ST-8
EL=986.2
ST-9
EL=981.2
ST-10
EL=981.7
ST-11
EL=997.4
ST-12
EL=990.2
ST-13
EL=991.7
ST-14
EL=988.3
ST-15
EL=989.0
ST-16
EL=990.5
ST-6
EL=984.8
ST-7
EL=983.7
ST-17
EL=982.1
ST-18
EL=982.9
ST-19
EL=983.8
ST-20
EL=982.6
ST-21
EL=982.6
ST-22
EL=985.8
NORTH
0 150 300
That part of the South Half of Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying
Northwesterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 01 degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds
East on an assumed bearing along the east line of South half a distance of 833.09 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be
described; thence South 22 degrees 09 minutes 09 seconds West a distance of 86.32 feet; thence Southerly 173. 73 feet along a
tangential curve concave southeasterly, having a central angle of 11 degrees 25 minutes 46 seconds and a radius of 870. 89 feet;
thence South 10 degrees 43 minutes 23 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 534.34 feet; thence southerly 29. 99
feet along a tangential curve concave easterly, having a central angle of 10 degrees 06 minutes 25 seconds and a radius of 170.1
feet; thence South 00 degrees 36 minutes 58 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 30.00 feet to the south line of said
South Half and said line there terminating.
Abstract property
AND
Parcel1:
The Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23, except the West 468 feet thereof,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 2:
That part of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter lying West of a line extending from the Southwest corner of the
Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter to a point on the North line of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter 660 feet
West along said North line from the Northeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, all in Section 3, Township
118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property.
Parcel 3:
Outlot B, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Abstract property
Parcel 4:
The North 468 feet of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118, Range 23,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 5:
The West 468 feet of the South 590 feet of the North 1058 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3,
Township 118 North, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 6:
That part of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23,
lying South of the North 1058 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Property Area = 5,880,542 Sf = 135.00 Ac.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
OT OVERHEAD TELEPHONE
>>
>
POWERPOLE
IRON MONUMENT FOUND
MONUMENT WITH PLASTIC
UTILITY BOX (TV, TEL, ELEC)
1/2" x 14" IRON PIPE
TRAFFIC SIGN
WATER MAIN
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
UNDERGROUND GAS MAIN
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC
FENCING
CONCRETE CURB
MANHOLE
WATER VALVE/CURB STOP
FIRE HYDRANT
FLARED END SECTION
CATCH BASIN
X
HEIGHT, TYPE
G
UT
UE
OE
FO
1 TITLE ITEM NUMBER
I
CAP #13057 SET
CONCRETE SURFACE
BUILDING
BITUMINOUS SURFACE
HEIGHT, TYPE
GRAVEL SURFACE
AIR CONDITIONER
HAND-HOLE
WETLAND
UNDERGROUND CABLE TV
WELL
GUY WIRE
TRANSFORMER
BEARING & DISTANCE
PER PLAT OR DEED
CAST IRON MONUMENT FOUND
PEDESTRIAN RAMP
SITE SYMBOLS
AC
UB
HH
WSO
PLAT EASEMENTPE
BACKGROUND INFORMATION SHOWN IS FROM A SURVEY PERFORMED BY LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES,
MINNEAPOLIS, MN WITH THE LAST DAY OF WORK PERFORMED ON NOVEMBER 4, 2020 EXPRESSLY FOR THIS PROJECT;
CITY OF MEDINA RECORD DRAWINGS; AND UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS. LANDFORM OFFERS NO WARRANTY,
EXPRESSED OR WRITTEN, FOR INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. EXISTING PROJECT CONDITIONS SHALL BE
VERIFIED PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. ERRORS, INCONSISTENCIES, OR OMISSIONS DISCOVERED SHALL BE
REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
1.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
OBTAIN PERMITS FOR DEMOLITION, CLEARING, AND DISPOSAL PRIOR TO BEGINNING.
CONTACT UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS FOR FIELD LOCATION OF SERVICES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING
DEMOLITION AND CLEARING.
SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES THAT MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO
DISTURBANCES TO SITE.
BUILDING DEMOLITION: VERIFY WITH OWNER THAT BUILDING HAS BEEN CLEARED OF REGULATED MATERIALS
REQUIRING SPECIAL HANDLING OR DISPOSAL. REMOVE STRUCTURE, COLUMNS, CANOPIES, FOOTINGS,
FOUNDATIONS, AND ANY ASSOCIATED CONSTRUCTION IN ITS ENTIRETY.
DIMENSIONS SHOWN FOR REMOVAL ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE
APPROPRIATE REMOVAL OF EXISTING FACILITIES.
REFER TO DETAILS FOR PAVEMENT SAWCUT. REMOVE CONCRETE WALKS AND CURBING TO THE NEAREST EXISTING
JOINT BEYOND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
COMPLETE DEMOLITION WITH MINIMAL DISRUPTION OF TRAFFIC. COORDINATE LANE CLOSURES WITH THE
REGULATORY AUTHORITY AND PROVIDE ADVANCE NOTIFICATION TO AFFECTED EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROVIDERS.
PROVIDE BARRICADES, LIGHTS, SIGNS, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND OTHER MEASURES NECESSARY FOR PROTECTION
AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC AND MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.
PROTECT STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, TREES, PLANT MATERIAL, SOD, AND ADJACENT PROPERTY FROM DAMAGE DURING
CONSTRUCTION UNLESS NOTED FOR REMOVAL. DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED TO EQUAL OR BETTER CONDITION AT
NO ADDITIONAL COST.
ABANDON WELLS AND REMOVE ON SITE SEWAGE FACILITIES PRIOR TO ANY OTHER DEMOLITION IN ACCORDANCE
WITH REQUIREMENTS OF REGULATORY AUTHORITIES.
REFER TO TREE PRESERVATION PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
REMOVE EXISTING SITE FEATURES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, PAVING, CURBING,
WALKWAYS, FENCING, RETAINING WALLS, SCREEN WALLS, APRONS, LIGHTING, RELATED FOUNDATIONS, SIGNAGE,
BOLLARDS, LANDSCAPING, AND STAIRWAYS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
COORDINATE REMOVAL, RELOCATION, TERMINATION, AND RE-USE OF EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITY SERVICES AND
APPURTENANCES WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES. RESTORE ELECTRIC HANDHOLES, PULLBOXES, POWERPOLES,
GUYLINES, AND STRUCTURES DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH UTILITY OWNER REQUIREMENTS.
EXISTING PIPING AND CONDUITS MAY BE ABANDONED IN-PLACE IF FILLED WITH SAND AND IF NOT IN LOCATION OF
PROPOSED BUILDING OR IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES. TERMINATE EXISTING SERVICES
AT THE SUPPLY SIDE IN CONFORMANCE WITH PROVIDER'S STANDARDS.
HAUL DEMOLITION DEBRIS OFF-SITE TO A FACILITY APPROVED BY REGULATORY AUTHORITIES FOR THE HANDLING OF
DEMOLITION DEBRIS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
DEMOLITION AND CLEARING NOTES
FO
EXISTING DESCRIPTION EXISTING DESCRIPTION
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C101MEH003.dwg
EXISTING CONDITIONS
& DEMOLITION
C1.1
:CURB REMOVAL
:TREE REMOVAL
:STRUCTURE AND/OR PAVEMENT REMOVAL
:CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
:SOIL BORING
B-X
LEGEND
:UTILITY LINE REMOVALXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
:SAWCUT
Parcel Table
Parcel #
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
Lot/Block
1/7
2/7
3/7
4/7
5/7
6/7
7/7
8/7
9/7
10/7
11/7
12/7
13/7
14/7
15/7
16/7
17/7
18/7
19/7
20/7
Area
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
4767
4767
3948
3948
3948
3948
4767
4767
Parcel Table
Parcel #
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
Lot/Block
21/7
22/7
23/7
24/7
25/7
26/7
27/7
28/7
29/7
30/7
31/7
32/7
33/7
34/7
35/7
36/7
37/7
38/7
39/7
40/7
Area
4767
4767
3948
3948
3948
3948
3948
3948
5267
5267
5267
5267
4950
4950
4767
4767
4620
4620
4620
4620
Parcel Table
Parcel #
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
Lot/Block
41/7
42/7
43/7
44/7
45/7
46/7
47/7
48/7
49/7
50/7
51/7
52/7
53/7
54/7
55/7
56/7
57/7
58/7
59/7
60/7
Area
4410
4410
5250
5250
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
Parcel Table
Parcel #
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
157
158
Lot/Block
61/7
62/7
63/7
64/7
65/7
66/7
67/7
68/7
69/7
70/7
71/7
72/7
73/7
74/7
75/7
76/7
77/7
R/W
R/W 2
Area
5500
5500
5500
5500
5342
5303
5461
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
5500
2812030
452468
10202
WE
T
L
A
N
D
2
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
e
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
d
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
b
NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3
660
DNR WETLAND 27-493W
NORTH PORTION
OHW = 978.3
FLOODPLAIN = 979.2
( As of 8/10/20)
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1c
WL 1e-1
WL 3
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1f
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1a
-
N
o
r
t
h
WL
1d-1
WL
1d
-
2
1475
1476
1477
14781479
1481
1482
1483 14841485
1486
14871488
1489
14901491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496 14971498
1499
1500
1501
150215031504150515061507 15081509 1510 1511
1512
CHIPPEWA ROAD
MO
H
A
W
K
D
R
I
V
E
3 4
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 20
21 22 23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
626364
6566
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
7
42
77
50
50
50
50
50
33
8
0
7
50.0
50.0
9
5
.
3
50.0
50.0
9
5
.
3
9
5
.
3
50.0
50.0
10
5
.
3
50.0
50.0
10
5
.
3
10
5
.
3
50.0
50.0
1
0
5
.
3
50.0
50.0
1
0
5
.
3
1
0
5
.
3
4
5
.
0
4
5
.
0
110.0 4
5
.
0
45
.
0
110.0
110.0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
95.3
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
95.3
95.3
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
105.
0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
105.
0
105.
0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110.0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110.0
110.0
110.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
110.0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110.0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110.0
110.0
50.0
50.0
11
0
.
0
50.0
50.0
11
0
.
0
11
0
.
0
50.0 50.0
10
6
.
8
44.7 50.0
10
6
.
8
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
110.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
110.0
110.0
110.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
110.0
110.0 5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110.0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110.0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0110.0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110.0
110.0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110.0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110.0
110.0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110
.
0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110
.
0
110
.
0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110.0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110.0
110.0
42.
0
42.
0
94.
0
42.
0
42.
0
94.
0
94
.
0
50.0 50.0
11
0
.
0
50.0 50.0
11
0
.
0
11
0
.
0
42
.
0
42
.
0
110
.
0
42
.
0
42
.
0
110
.
0
110
.
0
42.
0
42.
0
105
.
0
42.
0
42.
0
105
.
0
105
.
0
42
.
0
42
.
0
94.0
42
.
0
42
.
0
94.0
94.0
4
2
.
0
4
2
.
0
110.0
4
2
.
0
4
2
.
0
110.0
110.0
42
.
0
42
.
0
94.0
42
.
0
42
.
0
94.0
94.0
50.050.0
9
5
.
3
50.050.0
9
5
.
3
9
5
.
3
4
2
.
0
4
2
.
0
94.04
2
.
0
4
2
.
0
94.0
94.0
4
2
.
0
4
2
.
0
94.0
4
2
.
0
4
2
.
0
94.0
94.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
50
.
0
35
.
5
110.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
104.5
15
.
4
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
110.0
110.0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110.0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
95.
3
50
.
0
50
.
0
95.
3
95.
3
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110.0
5
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
110.0
110.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
50
.
0
50
.
0
110.0
110.0
92
.
3
10
6
.
8
142
.
3
37.032.032.032.037.0
56
.
0
56
.
0
56
.
0
76.0 219.1
26.22617.033.0
10
5
.
0
85
.
7
32
8
.
2
3
6
.
7
4
4
.
6
2
13
.
0
34
.
3
6.7
12
9
6
.
9
46.3
13
8
.
4
180.3
28
7
.
1
110.0
444.8 2 7 8 .5
189.6
537.7
278.1 215.5
94.5 76.0 76.084.3152.9
1275.0 2 4 7 .3
189.6
607.6
170.0
122
.
5
29.6
80
33
33 33
N89°42'49"W 2676.18
S0
0
°
2
0
'
4
4
"
E
2
6
4
0
.
4
8
N0
1
°
1
4
'
2
0
"
E
5
1
8
.
9
6
86
.
3
2
S2
2
°
0
9
'
3
9
"
W
L=173.73
R=870.89
Δ=11°25'46"
S1
0
°
4
3
'
5
3
"
W
5
3
4
.
3
4
50
AR
R
O
W
H
E
A
D
D
R
I
V
E
Drainage and Utility Easement
over all of Lot 77
Access Easement
A
c
c
e
s
s
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
Drainage and
Utility Easement
Drainage and
Utility Easement
NORTH
0 100 200
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C002MEH003.dwg
PRELIMINARY PLAT
NORTH
C0.2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That part of the South Half of Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, lying Northwesterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 01
degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds East on an assumed bearing along the east line of South half a
distance of 833.09 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 22 degrees
09 minutes 09 seconds West a distance of 86.32 feet; thence Southerly 173. 73 feet along a tangential
curve concave southeasterly, having a central angle of 11 degrees 25 minutes 46 seconds and a
radius of 870. 89 feet; thence South 10 degrees 43 minutes 23 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a
distance of 534.34 feet; thence southerly 29. 99 feet along a tangential curve concave easterly, having
a central angle of 10 degrees 06 minutes 25 seconds and a radius of 170.1 feet; thence South 00
degrees 36 minutes 58 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 30.00 feet to the south line
of said South Half and said line there terminating.
Abstract property
AND
Parcel1:
The Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23, except
the West 468
feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 2:
That part of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter lying West of a line extending from the
Southwest
corner of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter to a point on the North line of the Northeast
quarter of the
Southeast quarter 660 feet West along said North line from the Northeast corner of the Northeast
quarter of the
Southeast quarter, all in Section 3, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property.
Parcel 3:
Outlot B, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Abstract property
Parcel 4:
The North 468 feet of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3,
Township
118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 5:
The West 468 feet of the South 590 feet of the North 1058 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter
of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 6:
That part of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township
118 North,
Range 23, lying South of the North 1058 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
LOT AREA TABULATION
ZONING
TWINHOME SITE SUMMARY
SETBACK SUMMARY
UNIT SETBACKS:
FRONT (FROM BACK OF PRIVATE ROAD)
CORNER ( FROM BACK OF PRIVATE ROAD)
BETWEEN BUILDINGS
REAR (FROM BOUNDARY)
FROM MOHAWK DRIVE
FROM CHIPPEWA ROAD
25 FT.
25 FT.
30 FT.
30 FT.
50 FT.
50 FT.
CURRENT ZONING
PROPOSED ZONING
RR-UR RURAL RESIDENTIAL-URBAN RESERVE
PUD
OVERALL SITE SUMMARY - BOTH PARCELS
Net Residential Developable Area:48.52 Ac.
(Less Chippewa, Mohawk, Hackamore R/W )
Overall Net Residential Density:3.1 u/a
(150 units / 48.52 ac.)
SEE SHEET C0.3
Gross Site Area:74.74 Ac.
(Less Chippewa, Mohawk, Hackamore R/W )
Existing Wetland & Buffer Area:47.20 Ac.
Net Residential Developable Area:27.54 Ac.
Twin Home Residential:76 Units (38 Twinhome Bldgs)
(Lots and Local Roads, Private Roads @ 29' B-B )
Overall Net Density: 2.8 u/a
(76 units / 27.54 ac.)
Parcel Table
Parcel #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Lot/Block
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
1/2
2/2
3/2
4/2
5/2
6/2
7/2
8/2
9/2
1/3
2/3
3/3
4/3
1/4
2/4
3/4
4/4
Area
17426
14015
14015
14015
17072
11768
12966
20530
16191
15653
13816
14409
15659
11700
10627
11413
11273
10560
9900
10197
10984
Parcel Table
Parcel #
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
Lot/Block
5/4
6/4
7/4
8/4
9/4
10/4
1/5
2/5
3/5
4/5
5/5
6/5
7/5
8/5
9/5
10/5
1/6
2/6
3/6
4/6
5/6
Area
10964
10874
10113
11860
12086
16956
10210
9283
10440
14188
11334
12570
12598
19117
14744
13308
11093
13787
14437
14324
14027
Parcel Table
Parcel #
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
Lot/Block
1/8
2/8
3/8
4/8
5/8
6/8
7/8
8/8
9/8
10/8
11/8
12/8
13/8
14/8
15/8
16/8
17/8
18/8
19/8
20/8
21/8
Area
1740
1320
1320
1320
1320
1740
1740
1320
1320
1320
1320
1740
1740
1320
1320
1320
1320
1740
2072
1792
1792
Parcel Table
Parcel #
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
Lot/Block
22/8
23/8
24/8
25/8
26/8
27/8
28/8
29/8
30/8
31/8
32/8
33/8
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT C
OUTLOT D
R/W
R/W 2
Area
1792
2072
2072
1792
1792
2072
2072
1792
1792
1792
2072
154083
997266
191280
240781
28893
452468
10202
PID: 0211823320012
4250 ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
PID: 0211823320008
4200 ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
WE
T
L
A
N
D
2
DNR WETLAND 27-493W
SOUTH PORTION
OHW = 980.6
FLOODPLAIN = 981.5
( As of 8/10/20)
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
e
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
g
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3
NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3
660
468.00
46
8
.
0
0
59
0
.
0
0
S. LINE OF THE N. 1058 FT. OF THE
NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 3
WL 3
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1f
WE
T
L
A
N
D
4
WE
T
L
A
N
D
5
b
WL
5a
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1a
-
S
o
u
t
h
WL 1h
CHIPPEWA ROAD
MO
H
A
W
K
D
R
I
V
E
LA
N
E
HILL
S
I
D
E
BR
O
O
K
V
I
E
W
C
O
U
R
T
MEADOWVIEW COURT
1
6 3
2
1
4
3
2
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 2 3 4
5
4
1
2
3
4
3
2
8
1
2
3
4
5
16
17
18
31
OUTLOT AOUTLOT B
4
50.0
50.0
10
5
.
3
10
5
.
3
50.0
50.0
1
0
5
.
3
1
0
5
.
3
42
.
0
42
.
0
94.0
42
.
0
42
.
0
94.0
94.0
42
.
0
42
.
0
94.0
62.8
72.3
43
.
2
60
.
9
57
.
8
187
.
3
4.5
2
1
.
4
7
0
.
7
48 .2
4 6.9
46.
0
57.8
2 9 .7
14
8
.
7
98.1
90.4
1
3
5
.
0
82.4
50.4
179.8
1
5
0
.
1
1
5
0
.
1
160.4
13
7
.
3
135
.
0
18
8
.
9
12
.
1
57.1
68.366.9
199.3130.0
14
5
.
6
175.2
85.4
75.5
118.1
7
7
.
0
8
7
.
7
117.4
83.8
12.914.5
69.6
5
0
.
0
50.0
5 0 .0
78.4
2
7
.4
83.8
120
.
0
69
.
9
72
.
5
1
4
4
.
5
85
.
0
103.8
17
4
.
1
86.
9
53.
0
13
4
.
9
24.8
90
.
8
11
3
.
3
9
4
.
8
4
2
.
0
27.6
91.3
57.
4
15
0
.
0
68
.
2
77.5
10 9.0
5 3 .9
90
.
7
90
.
0
136.2
48.3
70.4
63.4
90
.
0
7.
4 130.0
75
.
0
75
.
0
75
.
0
10
6
.
8
192.5
220.
0
68
.
9
75
.
0
165
.
2
25.9
12
.
1
138.8
75
.
0
59
.
0
192.5
142
.
3
21.3
178.4
61
.
5
80
.
0
138.6
144.9
32
.
0
81
.
2
80
.
0
75
.
0
54
.
2
20.8
75.0
75.0
7 5
.0
1 5 .7
60.0
60.0
29
.
0
22
.
0
22
.
0
22
.
0
29
.
0
60.0 29
.
0
22
.
0
22
.
0
22
.
0
29
.
0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
29
.
0
22
.
0
22
.
0
22
.
0
29
.
0
60.0 29
.
0
22
.
0
22
.
0
22
.
0
29
.
0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
29
.
0
22
.
0
22
.
0
29
.
0
60.0 29
.
0
22
.
0
22
.
0
29
.
0
60.0
60.0
5
6
.
0
37.0
32.0
32.0
32.0
37.0
5
6
.
0
37.0
32.0
32.0
32.0
37.0
5
6
.
0
5
6
.
0
5
6
.
0
5
6
.
0
56
.
0
37.032.032.032.037.0
56
.
0
37.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 37.0
56
.
0
56
.
0
56
.
0
56
.
0
37
.
0
32
.
0
32
.
0
37
.
0
56.0 37
.
0
32
.
0
32
.
0
37
.
0
56.0
56.0
56.0
56.0
76.0 219.1
18
4
.
4
73.7
76.076.076.094.5
18
4
.
4
18
4
.
4
18
4
.
4
18
4
.
4
64.4
1
2
5
.
0
26.0
37.5
1 0 0 .8
6 0 .0
1
2
5
.
0
68.0 1
2
5
.
0
75
.
0
85
.
0
132.
0
132.
0
132.
0
110.6
1
3
4
.
0
5 0 .3
7 5 .0
7 0 .8
1
3
2
.
0
108.3
59.3
4.2
1
3
2
.
0
78.4
1
3
2
.
0
91.0
1
3
2
.
0
91.
1
13
4
.
0
91.
1
132
.
4
117.1
1
4
1
.
0
90.3
21.2
79
.
5
46
3
.
9
61
1
.
0
444.8
160.8
131.3
24
4
.
9
197.4
31
6
.
3
2 7 8 .5
189.6
537.7
278.1 215.5
17.6
94.5 76.0 76.0
68.0
84.3152.9
29
4
.
1
1275.0 2 4 7 .3
189.6
607.6
122
.
5
29.6
173.
2
57
.
2
54
1
.
1
288.
8
10
8
.
8
12
0
.
8
2
2
4
.
7
88.3
334.6
60.6
49.2
8
9
.
9
22
.
0
22
.
0
60.0
22
.
0
22
.
0
22
.
0
22
.
0
60.0
60.0
22
.
0
22
.
0
60.0
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
5
6
7
8
9
10
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
S39
°
2
9
'
2
2
"
W
4
8
1
.
8
7
N88°39'29"W 332.51
S2
6
°
3
3
'
2
1
"
W
1
4
6
8
.
0
9
S89°23'02"E 493.55
S0
0
°
2
0
'
4
4
"
E
2
6
4
0
.
4
8
33.01
N88°39'29"W
N0
0
°
2
0
'
4
4
"
W
14
1
8
.
9
5
N69°
5
8
'
2
0
"
W
4
8
3
.
4
8
N69°
5
8
'
2
0
"
W
2
0
1
.
5
5
N20°01'40"E
5.00
S1
0
°
4
3
'
5
3
"
W
5
3
4
.
3
4
L=29.99
R=170.00
Δ=10°06'25"
30.02
S00°37'28"W
8
0
80
33 33
33
33
50
50
R60
R60
50
5
0
17
0
19 20 21 22 23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
OUTLOT C
O
U
T
L
O
T
D
Drainage and
Utility Easement
over all of Lot 33
Ac
c
e
s
s
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
NORTH
0 100 200
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C003MEH003.dwg
PRELIMINARY PLAT
SOUTH
C0.3
LOT AREA TABULATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That part of the South Half of Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, lying Northwesterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 01
degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds East on an assumed bearing along the east line of South half a
distance of 833.09 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 22
degrees 09 minutes 09 seconds West a distance of 86.32 feet; thence Southerly 173. 73 feet
along a tangential curve concave southeasterly, having a central angle of 11 degrees 25 minutes
46 seconds and a radius of 870. 89 feet; thence South 10 degrees 43 minutes 23 seconds West,
tangent to said curve, a distance of 534.34 feet; thence southerly 29. 99 feet along a tangential
curve concave easterly, having a central angle of 10 degrees 06 minutes 25 seconds and a radius
of 170.1 feet; thence South 00 degrees 36 minutes 58 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a
distance of 30.00 feet to the south line of said South Half and said line there terminating.
Abstract property
AND
Parcel1:
The Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23,
except the West 468 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 2:
That part of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter lying West of a line extending from the
Southwest corner of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter to a point on the North line of
the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter 660 feet West along said North line from the
Northeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, all in Section 3, Township 118,
Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property.
Parcel 3:
Outlot B, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Abstract property
Parcel 4:
The North 468 feet of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of
Section 3, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 5:
The West 468 feet of the South 590 feet of the North 1058 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens property
Parcel 6:
That part of the West 468 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3,
Township 118 North, Range 23, lying South of the North 1058 feet thereof, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
Torrens property
ZONING
SOUTH PARCEL SITE SUMMARY
SETBACK SUMMARY
UNIT SETBACKS:
FRONT
CORNER
REAR
SIDE
STRUCTURE FROM WETLAND BUFFER
FROM MOHAWK DRIVE
FROM CHIPPEWA ROAD
30 FT.
30 FT.
30 FT.
10 FT.
15 F.T.
50 FT.
50 FT.
CURRENT ZONING
PROPOSED ZONING
RR-UR RURAL RESIDENTIAL-URBAN
RESERVE
PUD
Gross Site Area:52.61 Ac.
(Less Chippewa, Mohawk R/W )
Existing Wetland & Buffer Area:26.10 Ac.
Park / Open space: 5.53 Ac.
Net Residential Developable Area:20.98 Ac.
(Lots and Local Roads, Private Roads @ 29' B-B )
Residential Lots:74 Units
Single Family Lots 70' x 130' +/-42 lots
Row Townhome Lots 33 lots
Single Family Density: 2.7 u/a
(42 units / 16.25 ac.)
Row Townhome Density: 6.8 u/a
(32 units / 4.73 ac.)
Overall Net Density: 3.5 u/a
(74 units / 20.98 ac.)
Wetlands were delineated by Kjolhaug Environmental and field located by
Landform Professional Services.
OVERALL SITE SUMMARY - BOTH PARCELS
Net Residential Developable Area:48.52 Ac.
(Less Chippewa, Mohawk, Hackamore R/W )
Overall Net Residential Density:3.1 u/a
(150 units / 48.52 ac.)
SEE SHEET C0.2
CABX
CABX
W
OE OE OE OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
WE
T
L
A
N
D
2
N89°42'49"W 2676.18
S0
0
°
2
0
'
4
4
"
E
2
6
4
0
.
4
8
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
e
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
d
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
b
DNR WETLAND 27-493W
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1c
WL 1e-1
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1f
ST-1
EL=990.6
ST-2
EL=990.4
ST-3
EL=987.4
ST-4
EL=983.8
ST-5
EL=982.2
ST-8
EL=986.2
ST-9
EL=981.2
ST-10
EL=981.7
ST-6
EL=984.8
ST-7
EL=983.7
ST-17EL=982.1
ST-18
EL=982.9
ST-19
EL=983.8
ST-20
EL=982.6
ST-21
EL=982.6
ST-22
EL=985.8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 20
21 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
6364
6566
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
BLOCK 7
42
77
4321
5
BLK 1
4
19 20 21 22 23
24
BLOCK 7
POND
(23P)
BTM = 973.00
NWL = 982.00
HWL = 984.33
100 YR B-B = 985.15
IRRIGATION POND
(1P)
BTM = 976.00
NWL = 985.00
HWL = 986.54
POND
(9P)
BTM = 976.00
NWL = 985.00
HWL = 987.11
POND
(5P)
BTM = 974.00
NWL = 983.00
HWL = 984.65
WET 1f
HWL =
985.16
POND 3
HWL =
991.07
WET 1e
HWL = 983.88
WET 2
HWL = 986.27
WET 1d
HWL = 982.55
WET 1c
HWL =
981.76
WET 1b1
HWL = 980.63
WET 1b
HWL = 981.63
15
16
17
18
BTM = 974.00
NWL = 979.50
HWL = 980.21
POND (1P)
POND
(13P)
BTM = 979.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 988.00
35'
35'
3
5
'
2
5
'
2
5
'
35'
35'
50'
50'5
0
'
35'
35'
35'
50'
25'
35
'
30'
3
0
'
50'
30
B-B
1010
30
10
10
2525
25
25
BITUM
I
N
O
U
S
EDGE
C7.3
6
MOUNTABLE CURB
& GUTTER
EDGE O
F
GRAVEL
R20
R5
TYP.
6
24
6
80
RO
W
C7.3
6
B618 CURB
AT INTERSECTIONS
(TYP.)
C7.3
6
MOUNTABLE CURB
& GUTTER
STREET LIGHT (TYP.)
C7.3
9
CONC. CURB &
GUTTER TRANSITION
(TYP.)
STREET SIGN
STOP SIGN
R
3
0
STREET LIGHT (TYP.)
30
B-B
R30
STREET SIGN
STOP SIGN
C7.3
8 BIKE PATH
6
CHIPPEWA
MO
H
A
W
K
D
R
I
V
E
ROAD
WETLAND BUFFER
15
15
15
50
50
30
30
40
40
40
50
NORTH
0 100 200
OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN, OR USE OF, PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
THE DIGITAL FILE, WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE ENGINEER, SHALL BE USED FOR STAKING. DISCREPANCIES
BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS AND THE DIGITAL FILE SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER. THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT,
AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS, AND THE DIGITAL FILE, SHALL BE COMPARED TO THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS
PRIOR TO STAKING.
BUILDING LAYOUT ANGLES ARE PARALLEL WITH OR PERPENDICULAR TO THE PROPERTY LINE AT THE LOCATION
INDICATED.
DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO BACK OF CURB AND EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
DELINEATE PARKING STALLS WITH A 4-INCH WIDE YELLOW PAINTED STRIPE. DELINEATE ACCESS AISLES WITH 4-INCH
WIDE YELLOW PAINTED STRIPES 18 INCHES ON CENTER AND AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE TO DIRECTION OF TRAVEL.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
GENERAL NOTES
TWINHOMES PARKING SUMMARY
AREA SUMMARY
ZONING AND SETBACK SUMMARY
SITE PLAN NOTES
FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM AT 612.252.9070.1.
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C201MEH003.dwg
SITE PLAN
NORTH
C2.1
TOTAL SITE AREA - 5,880,541 SQ. FT. = 135.00 AC.
NET AREA (Less Chippewa, Mohawk, Hackamore R/W ) = 127.35 AC.
WETLAND AREA (With Buffer) = 73.30 AC.
OPEN SPACE (South) = 5.53 Ac.
NET AREA = 48.52 AC.
NUMBER LOTS - 152
NUMBER UNITS - 150
NET DENSITY - 3.1 U/A
NET IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE - 17.92 AC. - 36.9%
TOTAL PARKING STALLS REQUIRED
REQUIRED PARKING:
TWO SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT
152
34
388 EA.
EA.
EA.2 STALLS PER UNIT - GARAGE
STANDARD STALLS (NOT ASSIGNED)
OFF-STREET PARKING PROVIDED:
TOTAL PARKING STALLS PROVIDED
(9x19)
152 EA.
152 EA.2 STALLS PER UNIT - DRIVEWAY
SEE SHEET C2.2
TYPICAL TWINHOME LAYOUT
62
6364
65
30
'
B-
B
25
'
40.2
30' MIN.
THE PROPERTY IS ZONED AGRICULTURAL/RURAL RESIDENTIAL
BUILDING SETBACK INFORMATION IS AS FOLLOWS:
TWINHOMES:
FRONT (FROM PRIVATE ROAD) - 25 FEET
CORNER (FROM PRIVATE ROAD) - 25 FEET
BETWEEN BUILDINGS - 30 FEET
REAR -FROM BOUNDRY - 30 FEET
-FROM MOHAWK DR. - 50 FEET
-FROM CHIPPAWA RD. - 50 FEET
WETLAND BUFFER LIST
CABX
EM
EM
CABX
CABX
C
A
B
X
CA
B
X
GAS
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OTV
O
T
V
DNR WETLAND 27-493W
SOUTH PORTION
OHW = 980.6
FLOODPLAIN = 981.5
( As of 8/10/20)
S2
6
°
3
3
'
2
1
"
W
1
4
6
8
.
0
9
N88°39'29"W 332.51
S39
°
2
9
'
2
2
"
W
4
8
1
.
8
7
N69
°
5
8
'
2
0
"
W
2
0
1
.
5
5
N69
°
5
8
'
2
0
"
W
4
8
3
.
4
8
N20°01'40"E
5.00
N0
0
°
2
0
'
4
4
"
W
1
5
4
.
8
2
33.01
N88°39'29"W
S0
0
°
2
0
'
4
4
"
E
2
6
4
0
.
4
8
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
g
WL 3
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1f
WE
T
L
A
N
D
4
WE
T
L
A
N
D
5
b
WL
5a
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1a
-
S
o
u
t
h
WL 1h
ST-11
EL=997.4
ST-12
EL=990.2
ST-13
EL=991.7
ST-14
EL=988.3
ST-15
EL=989.0
ST-16
EL=990.5
14
0
.
0
75
.
0
18
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
BLK 2
7
6
5
3
4
2
1
8
9
432
3
1
2 1
4
2
3
BLK 6
BLK
4
BLK 5
1
1
2
3
45
6
7
8 9
10
10
5
BLK 1
4
19 20 21 22 23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33 BLK 8
FILTRATION
BASIN (16P)
BTM = 984.50
HWL = 987.61
POND
(18P)
BTM = 978.00
NWL = 986.00
HWL = 987.42
POND
(20P)
BTM = 975.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 986.33
POND
(14P)
BTM = 980.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 988.42
PROPOSED 100-YR
HWL = 981.83
OUTLOT C
WET 1h
HWL = 983.89
WET 4
HWL = 985.01
WET 5b
HWL = 983.38
100-YR B-B = 985.00
W
E
T
5
a
H
W
L
=
9
8
3
.
3
8
1
0
0
-
Y
R
B
-
B
=
9
8
5
.
0
0
WET 1f
HWL =
985.16
POND 3
HWL =
991.07
OUTLOT D
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
40'
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
POND
(13P)
BTM = 979.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 988.00
1
6
8
'
172'
5
0
'
50
'
25
'
35'25
'
25
'
35
'
35
'
50'
50'
50
'
B
U
F
F
E
R
3
0
'
30'
2
5
'
25'
25'
25'
2
5
'
50'
15'
30'
3
0
'
50'
3
0
'
59'
5
0
'
BLK
3
BITUM
I
N
O
U
S
EDGE
EDGE O
F
GRAVE
L
6
24
6
80
RO
W
STREET SIGN (TYP.)
STREET LIGHT (TYP.)
STOP SIGN (TYP.)
R30
STREET
SIGN(TYP.)
STREET LIGHT (TYP.)
STOP SIGN
(TYP)
R44.5
R
2
8
28
B-
B
C7.3
9
CONC. CURB &
GUTTER TRANSITION
(TYP)
C7.3
6
B618 CURB
AT INTERSECTIONS
(TYP.)
C7.3
6
MOUNTABLE
CURB & GUTTER
C7.3
8
SIDEWALK
(TYP.)
C7.3
6
MOUNTABLE
CURB & GUTTER
(TYP.)
R44
.
5
R6
0
R
4
8
R20
TYP
C7.3
8
FUTURE TRAIL
BY OTHERS
STREET
LIGHT (TYP.)
STREET LIGHT
(TYP.)
STREET
SIGN
(TYP.)
STREET LIGHT
(TYP.)
STOP SIGN (TYP.)
C7.3
6
B618 CURB
AT INTERSECTION
(TYP.)
CHIPPEWA
MO
H
A
W
K
D
R
I
V
E
HILL
S
I
D
E
BR
O
O
K
V
I
E
W
C
O
U
R
T
MEADOWVIEW COURT
ROAD
LA
N
E
1
5
15
15
15
NORTH
0 100 200
GENERAL NOTES
AREA SUMMARY
ZONING AND SETBACK SUMMARY
SITE PLAN NOTES
FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM AT
612.252.9070.
1.
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C202MEH003.dwg
SITE PLAN
SOUTH
C2.2
TOTAL SITE AREA - 5,880,541 SQ. FT. = 135.00 AC.
NET AREA (Less Chippewa, Mohawk, Hackamore R/W ) = 127.35 AC.
WETLAND AREA (With Buffer) = 73.30 AC.
OPEN SPACE (South) = 5.53 Ac.
NET AREA = 48.52 AC.
NUMBER LOTS - 152
NUMBER UNITS - 150
NET DENSITY - 3.1 U/A
NET IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE - 17.92 AC. - 36.9%
OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN, OR USE OF, PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY.
THE DIGITAL FILE, WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE ENGINEER, SHALL BE USED FOR
STAKING. DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS AND THE DIGITAL FILE SHALL BE
REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER. THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT, AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS,
AND THE DIGITAL FILE, SHALL BE COMPARED TO THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS PRIOR TO
STAKING.
BUILDING LAYOUT ANGLES ARE PARALLEL WITH OR PERPENDICULAR TO THE PROPERTY LINE AT
THE LOCATION INDICATED.
DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO BACK OF CURB AND EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE.
DELINEATE PARKING STALLS WITH A 4-INCH WIDE YELLOW PAINTED STRIPE. DELINEATE ACCESS
AISLES WITH 4-INCH WIDE YELLOW PAINTED STRIPES 18 INCHES ON CENTER AND AT 45 DEGREE
ANGLE TO DIRECTION OF TRAVEL.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
THE PROPERTY IS ZONED AGRICULTURAL/RURAL RESIDENTIAL
BUILDING SETBACK INFORMATION IS AS FOLLOWS:
TOWNHOMES:
BACK OF CURB - 23 FEET MINIMUM, RANGE 23 FEET TO 26 FEET TYP.
REAR - FROM CHIPPAWA RD. -50 FEET
-FROM MOHAWK DR. -50 FEET
SINGLE FAMILY:
FRONT - 30 FEET
CORNER - 30 FEET
SIDE - 10 FEET
REAR - 30 FEET
REAR - FROM BOUNDRY - 30 FEET
- FROM MOHAWK DR. - 50 FEET
-FROM CHIPPAWA RD. - 50 FEET
SEE SHEET C2.1
TYPICAL SINGLE FAMILY LOT LAYOUT
28
'
B-
B
30
'
432
BLK 1
10'
30
'
SETBACK
LINE
EASEMENT
LINE
25'
19 20 21 22 23
24
'
B-
B
24
'
TYPICAL TOWNHOME LOT LAYOUT
WETLAND BUFFER LIST
W
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
WE
T
L
A
N
D
2
170
33
33
33
33 33
3333
3333
33
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
e
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
d
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
b
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
g
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>
980.6
980.
6
980.6
980.
6
980.6
980.
6
980
.
6
98
0
.
6
980.6
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1c
WL 1e-1
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1f
WE
T
L
A
N
D
4
WE
T
L
A
N
D
5
b
WL
5a
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1a
-
N
o
r
t
h
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1a
-
S
o
u
t
h
WL 1h
MB
116411651166116711681169117011711172117311741175
1176
11771178
1179118011811182118311841185
1186 11871188
118911901191
11921193
11941195
11961197
119811991200
140114021403
14041405140614071408140914101411141214131414141514161417
14181419142014211422
142314241425
14261427
1428142914301431
1432
1433143414351436
143714381439144014411442
14431444
1445
144614471448144914501451
1452
145314541455
1456
1457
1458
14591460146114621463
1464146514661467 14681469
14701471147214731474
147514761477
147814791480
14811482
1483 14841485
1486
14871488
148914901491
1492149314941495
1496149714981499
1500
1501150215031504150515061507 1508150915101511 1512
ST-1EL=990.6
ST-2EL=990.4
ST-3EL=987.4
ST-4EL=983.8
ST-5EL=982.2
ST-8EL=986.2
ST-9EL=981.2
ST-10EL=981.7
ST-11EL=997.4
ST-12EL=990.2
ST-13
EL=991.7
ST-14
EL=988.3
ST-15EL=989.0
ST-16EL=990.5
ST-6EL=984.8
ST-7EL=983.7
ST-17EL=982.1
ST-18EL=982.9
ST-19EL=983.8
ST-20EL=982.6
ST-21EL=982.6
ST-22EL=985.8
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
S
T
M
STM
STM
ST
M
ST
M
S
T
M
S
T
M
STM
>>>>
>>
>>
ST
M
ST
M
ST
M
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
ST
M
S
T
M
STM
STM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>>>STM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
VMA
%8.0
V
M
A
VM
A
%
8.0
6:1Slope
in buffer
6:1
MAX
6:1Slope
in buffer
6:
1
Sl
o
p
e
6:1
6:1
6:
1
6
:
1
986
988
986
986
982
992
998
10
0
0
10
0
0
1
0
0
0
9
9
2
99
2
984
988
990
984
988
998
990
988
986
988
988
988
986
1
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
990
988
988
992
988
988
986
98
6
992
988
992
984
984
982
984
982
984
988
982
984
986986
984
986
984
982
982
982
986
988
984
98
8
986
988
988
988
986
986
98
8
988
98
6
988
986 988
988
6:1
VMA
VM
A
VM
A
VM
A
2.0%
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
2.0%
2.0%
>
>
>
>
>
>
9
8
8
9
8
6
9
9
4
988
992
984
992994
992
984
982
984
988986
992
9
8
4
994
9
9
0
9
8
2
996
9
9
6
9
9
6
990
994
986
994
992
994
996
994
998
99
6
99
2
99
4
99
6
99
4
99
6
99
4
99
6
992
992
99
2
99
0
986
988
984
984
9
8
4
98
6
984
9
8
6
985
994
9
9
2
988
992
988
990
988
988
988
990
990
988
986
994
992
990
990
990
992
9
8
6
99
0
986
986
986
984
982
980
98
6
980
982
984
986
9
8
6
992
99
4
996
996 994
9
8
6
98
8
9
8
6
986
990
98
0
98
4
98
6
990
99
0
988
9
8
4
984
988 988
992
990
990
990
994
99
2
994
9
8
2
9
8
6
98499
0
98
6
99
2
9
8
8
99
2
98
6
990988
986
990
99
2
988 994
992
996
990
986
996
9
9
2
9
8
6
996
986
986
990
996
982
9
8
4
9
8
6
99
2
990
99
4
994
98
8
98
4
9
9
2
9
9
2
990
986
9
9
2
994
994
990
98
6
99
4
986
99
4
99
4
994
9
9
4
994
994
99
4
994
9
9
0
9
8
6
994
99
4
9
9
2
986
990
994
994
98
6
98
6
9
8
8
990
988
99
2
994
98
6
994
994 988
986
990
992
98
698
6
99
2
98
6
986
994
994
9
9
2
998
9
9
8
9
9
2
992
994
986
99
0
99
0
99
2
99
4
98
8
99
2
99
4
99
2
99
2
9
9
4
99
6
994
994
996
9
9
0
99
4
9
8
4
9
8
8
988
98
8
992
10
0
0
10
0
0
1
0
0
4
99
2
99
0
990
988
9
9
2
99
4
985
98
8
9
8
8
988987
98
5
984
9
8
7
990
98
8
98
6
986
986
986
987986
985
987987
986 987 987
992
988
988
986
992
99
6
996
983
985
981
980
978
976
974973
98
398
5
98
0
97
4
98
5
98
0
97
6
97
3
973 974
978
981
983
985
9
7
3
9
7
4
97
8
98
1
9
8
3
98
6
983
976
980
984
990
974
976
978
980
982
984
980
980
98
2
9
8
0
9
8
2
983
982
980
978976 974
992
99
2
98
4
978
992
9
9
4
9
9
4
994
98
8
98
6
98
4
.
5
9
8
6
9
8
8
984 983
982
980
978
976 976
980
983
984
985
98
6
986
985
984 983
980
976
975
978
980
982983
984
986
988
98
5
98
5
98
7
98
5
98
6
98
6
98
7
9
8
7
99
2
990
990
994
994
994
99
4
994
990
994
994
988
986
9
9
0
986
986
990 994
9
9
6
9
9
6
98
8
990
990
99
0
98
8
98
6
988
990
996
994
98
8
984
984
98
4
984
992
986
990
9
8
6
9
8
8
9
9
0
986
988988
994
992
990
988986
984982
9
8
8
9
8
4
99
4
99
0 98
6
97
6
97
8
98
0
98
2
98
3
98
4
985
98
5
986 985
984
986
97
7
990
990
990
990
990
990
990
990
988
990
986
990
979
980
982
984986
992
990
987
988
99
2
99
2
99
0
99
0
99
4
99
2
99
2
99
4
99
6
986
986
986
986
994
998
1002
1
0
0
6
1
0
0
2
9
9
6
1
0
0
4
985
984
982 980 978 978
986985
984
982
980
978
975
994
996
982
.
5
982.5
98
4
984
981
.
5
980
978
976
976
980
986
9
8
6
98
4
98
2
98
4
98
6
98
8
982
974
97
3
.
5
992
993
9
9
0
992
VM
A
986
98
8
99
0
988
990
VMA
9
9
8
9
9
6
9
9
4
994
996
9
9
4
99
6
996
994
992
986
986
986
986
982
98
2
9
8
2
982
982
992
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 20
21 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
6364
6566
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
BLOCK 7
42
77
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
BLK 2
7
6
5
3
4
2
1
8
9
432
3
1
2 1
4
2
3
BLK 6
BLK
4
BLK 5
1
1
2
3
45
6
7
8 9
10
10
5
BLK 1
4
19 20 21 22 23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
CHIPPEWA ROAD
MO
H
A
W
K
D
R
I
V
E
MO
H
A
W
K
D
R
I
V
E
LA
N
E
33 BLK 8
BLOCK 7
HILL
S
I
D
E
BR
O
O
K
V
I
E
W
C
O
U
R
T
MEADOWVIEW
OUTLOT C
OUTLOT D
COURT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
40'
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
BLK
3
C3.1
C3.2
C3.4
C3.3
C3.5
C3.6
C3.7
NORTH
0 200 400
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C300MEH003.dwg
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
C3.0
Contact utility service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning grading.
Refer to the Geotechnical Report prepared by Braun Intertec, Dated 8/24/2020, For additional information on backfill material and
groundwater conditions.
Remove topsoil from grading areas and stockpile sufficient quantity for reuse. Materials may be mined from landscape areas for use
on site and replaced with excess organic material with prior Owner approval.
Remove surface and ground water from excavations. Provide initial lifts of stable foundation material if exposed soils are wet and
unstable.
Rough grade Building Pad to 12 Inches below Finished Floor Elevation (FFE).
Refer to Structural Specifications for Earthwork requirements for Building Pads.
An Independent Testing Firm shall verify the removal of organic and unsuitable soils, soil correction, and compaction and provide
periodic reports to the Owner.
Place and compact fill using lift thicknesses matched to soil type and compaction equipment to obtain specified compaction
throughout the lift.
Compact cohesive soils in paved areas to 95% of maximum dry density, Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) except the top 3 feet which
shall be compacted to 100%. Compact to 98% density where fill depth exceeds 10 feet. The soils shall be within 3% of optimum
moisture content. In granular soils all portions of the embankment shall be compacted to not less than 95% of Modified Proctor
Density (ASTM D1557).
Coordinate with Architectural for building stoop locations. Slopes shown on adjacent walks and pavements should continue over
stoops.
Avoid soil compaction of infiltration practices. Any equipment used in Infiltration Areas should be small scaled and tracked. Install
protective fencing as shown <before work begins/after basin is constructed/other timing?>.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Install perimeter sediment controls prior to beginning work and maintain for duration of construction. Remove controls after areas
contributing runoff are permanently stabilized and dispose of off site.
Limit soil disturbance to the grading limits shown. Schedule operations to minimize length of exposure of disturbed areas.
Management practices shown are the minimum requirement. Install and maintain additional controls as work proceeds to prevent
erosion and control sediment carried by wind or water.
Refer to SWPPP Notes on Sheet C3.8 for additional requirements.
Excavate ponds early in the construction sequence. Remove sediment from ponds periodically and after areas contributing runoff
are permanently stabilized.
Contractor shall prevent sediment laden water from entering the infiltration system until the site is completely stabilized.
All exposed soil areas must be stabilized within 72 hours of completion of work in each area. (If within 1 mile of Impaired Water use
the following note instead) all exposed soils areas shall be stabilized immediately to limit soil erosion in that portion of the site where
construction has temporarily or permanently ceased.
Seed, Sod, Mulch and Fertilizer shall meet the following Specifications, as modified.
Item Specification Number Estimated Quantities
Sod MNDOT 3878 X S.F.
Seed MNDOT 3876
MN TYPE 22-111 @ 30.5 LB/AC - Temporary Erosion Control X LBS.
MN TYPE 25-151 @ 120 LB/AC - Permanent Turf X LBS.
Mulch MNDOT 3882
MNDOT TYPE 1 @ 2 TON/AC Disc Anchored)X TON
MNDOT 3881
General placement MNDOT 2575
Erosion Control Blanket MNDOT 3885
MNDOT TYPE 3N X S.F.
See Landscape Sheets for permanent turf and landscape establishment.
Scrape adjacent streets clean daily and sweep clean weekly.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
GRADING NOTES
:Inlet Protection
nn
:Silt Fence
:Pavement Sawcut
:Construction Limits
:Vehicle Tracking Pad
X Each
X Each
X Feet
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
:Compost or Bio Log X Feet)))))))))))))
:Erosion Control Blanket X Each
LEGEND
ESTIMATED QUANTITYSYMBOLDESCRIPTION
910
908
:MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:Heavy Duty Silt Fence X Feet
:Wetland Impact Area X Each
GENERAL NOTES
FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT
612.252.9070
1.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
S
T
M
STM
STM
ST
M
ST
M
S
T
M
S
T
M
STM
>>
>>
ST
M
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>STM
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
S
T
M
STM
STM
ST
M
ST
M
S
T
M
S
T
M
STM
>>
>>
ST
M
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>STM
CABX
HH
INV=988.56
INV CMP 15 TO STMH
INV=990.15
FES 15 RCP
INV=990.82
FES 15 RCP
OE OE OE OE
>>
>>
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
>>
3333
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
d
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
b
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
INV=990.47
FES 15 IN PVC
INV=990.09
FES RCP 15 IN
RE=992.02
STMH ST-1
EL=990.6
ST-2
EL=990.4
ST-3
EL=987.4
ST-4
EL=983.8
ST-5
EL=982.2
ST-17
EL=982.1
ST-18
EL=982.9
ST-19
EL=983.8
H.P.
%2.6
%
5.
3
%
4.
7
%
3.8
%
5.0
H.P.
94.28
%5.4
%4.2
%3.6
%4.8
%6.8
%8.0
%7.6
%5.6
%3.2
%2.6
%
2.7
%
3.7
%3.7
%4.6
H
.
P
.
97
.
8
8
H
.
P
.
L.
P
.
95.
6
0
9
6
.
1
3
L
.
P
.
9
5
.
9
9
L.P.
93.41
%4.7
%3.7
%2.5
%3.7
%3.0
%2.4
%
7.
8
%
7.
1
%4.0
%
3.6
%
4.2
%3.3
%4.3
%4.8
%3.9
%2.5
%2.5
%
3.8
%
3.6
%2.1
%2.5
%2.5
%5.6
%4.4
%4.5
%4.5
%5.6
%5.9
%4.6
%5.1
H.P.
93.37
8
5
.
5
E
O
F
EX.CL992.75
%8.0
92.28%2.85%1.2
%
1.
0
%1.4
%
1.
6
6
G.
B
.
%6.4
%6.8
%4.3
95.0
94.0
994.6
96.3
96.3
94.8
94.8
87.5
87.5
86.0
86.0
94.0
86.0
86.0
94.0
%
1.
0
%
1.
0
986.5
86.5
94.5
86.5
86.5
86.5 86.5
93.8
93.8
94.0
93.8
94.8
94.8
94.8
94.5
94.3
94.3
94.0
93.8
%1.0
94.5
86.5 86.5
94.5
86.5
86.5
%
1.0
%
1.
3
%
1
.
0
%
1
.
0
%1.75
86.5
94.5
88.0
88.0
95.5
88.5
88.5
96.5
88.5
88.5
96.5
89.5
89.5
97.0
89.0
89.097.0
89.0
89.0
97.0
90.0
90.0
89.5
89.5
97.5
89.5
89.5
97.0
89.0
89.0
97.089.0
89.0
97.0
90.0
90.0
97.0
L.P.
91.73
H.P
.
94.
9
0
9
7
.
3
7
H
.
P
.
VMA
%
8.0
6:1Slope
in buffe
r
6:1
MAX9
9
4
9
9
0
996
9
9
6
9
9
6
990
99
4
986
994
992
994
996
994
99
8
99
6
99
2
99
4
99
6
99
4
99
6
99
4
99
6
992
9
9
2
9
9
0
98
4
984
9
8
4
9
8
6
98
4
9
8
6
99
4
996
990
986
996
9
9
2
9
8
6
996
986
986
990
996
98
2
9
8
4
9
8
6
9
9
2
990
9
9
4
994
98
8
9
8
4
9
9
2
994
994
990
98
6
99
4
986
9
9
4
99
4
994
9
9
4
994
99
4
99
4
994
9
9
0
9
8
6
994
9
9
4
9
9
2
986
990
994
994
9
9
2
99
4
99
2
99
4
99
2
9
9
2
9
9
4
99
6
9
9
2
99
4
9
9
6
996
983
985
981
980
978
976
974973
98
3
98
5
98
0
97
4
98
5
98
0
97
6
97
3
973 974
978
981
983
985
9
7
3
9
7
4
9
7
8
9
8
1
9
8
3
9
8
6
983
994
992
990
988
986
984982
9
8
4
99
4
99
0 98
6
982
98
2
9
8
2
982
982
96.4
98.5
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
5
9
9
1
.
0
F
B
W
O
9
9
0
.
5
GF
=
9
9
7
.
0
98
9
.
5
FB
99
6
.
8
GF
=
9
9
5
.
5
98
8
.
0
FB
99
5
.
3
G
F
=
9
9
7
.
0
98
9
.
5
FB
W
O
98
9
.
0
G
F
=
9
9
7
.
5
9
9
0
.
0
F
B
W
O
9
8
9
.
5
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
0
9
9
0
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
9
0
.
0
G
F
=
9
9
7
.
0
98
9
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
8
9
.
0
G
F
=
9
9
6
.
5
9
8
9
.
0
F
B
W
O
9
8
8
.
5
G
F
=
9
9
5
.
0
9
8
7
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
8
7
.
0
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
98
7
.
0
FB
99
4
.
3
GF
=
9
9
5
.
5
98
8
.
0
FB
99
5
.
3
GF
=
9
9
5
.
0
98
7
.
5
FB
99
4
.
8
GF=995.0
987.5
FBWO
987.0
G
F
=
9
9
7
.
5
9
9
0
.
0
F
B
W
O
9
8
9
.
5
GF=
9
9
5
.
0
987.
5
FB
W
O
987.
0GF=995.0
987.5
FBWO
987.0
GF
=
9
9
5
.
0
98
7
.
5
FB
W
O
98
7
.
0
GF
=
9
9
4
.
7
98
7
.
2
FB
W
O
98
6
.
7
GF
=
9
9
5
.
0
98
7
.
5
FB
W
O
98
7
.
0
GF
=
9
9
6
.
0
98
8
.
5
FB
W
O
98
8
.
0
G
F
=
9
9
7
.
5
9
9
0
.
0
F
B
W
O
9
8
9
.
5
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
5
9
9
1
.
0
F
B
W
O
9
9
0
.
5
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
0
9
9
0
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
9
0
.
0
G
F
=
9
9
4
.
5
9
8
7
.
0
F
B
9
9
4
.
3
G
F
=
9
9
7
.
5
9
9
0
.
0
F
B
W
O
9
8
9
.
5
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
0
9
9
0
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
9
0
.
0
GF
=
9
9
4
.
7
98
7
.
2
FB
W
O
98
6
.
7
96.5
93.0
93.2
93.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
6364
6566
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
BLOCK 7
42
0+00 1+00 2+00
0+
0
0
1+
0
0
2+
0
0
3+
0
0
4
+
0
0
5+0
0
7+00
1
6
+
0
0
1
7
+
0
0
18+
0
0
19
+
0
0
2
0
+
0
0
2
1
+
0
0
2
2
+
0
0
2
3
+
0
0
2
4
+
0
0
25+0026+0027+0028+00
29+
0
0
30
+
0
0
31
+
0
0
31
+
1
7
.
8
7
BTM = 973.00
NWL = 982.00
HWL = 984.33
100 YR B-B = 985.15
IRRIGATION POND
(1P)
WET 1b
HWL = 981.63
35'
35'
35'
35'
INV=981.70
C7.1
3,4&5
INLET
PROTECTION
C7.1
6
FES EROSION
CONTROL (TYP)
ENKAMAT (TYP)
C7.1
8
EROSION
CONTROL
BLANKET
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
1
SILT FENCE
C7.1
7
ROCK
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
3,4&5
INLET
PROTECTION
C7.1
8
EROSION
CONTROL
BLANKET
BORROW AREA
3
C7.1
1
SILT
FENCE
NORTH
0 50 100
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C301MEH003.dwg
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
C3.1
:Inlet Protection
nn
:Silt Fence
:Vehicle Tracking Pad
X Each
X Each
X Feet
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
:Compost or Bio Log X Feet)))))))))))))
:Erosion Control Blanket X Each
NO SCALE
TYPICAL LOT DETAIL1
NOTES:
1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY.
: REAR ELEVATION
: BUILDING TYPE - (CUSTOM GRADING BY BUILDER)
: MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION
: FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
: DRP 1' DENOTES DISTANCE GARAGE
FLOOR IS DROPPED FROM TYPICAL.
DRP
1'
MAIN STREET
BLK 1
5
X 105.0 X 105.0
X
106.5
X
106.5
DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNER
ELEVATIONS
DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT
20' FRONT
10' SIDE
10' REAR
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE
DENOTES BUILDING
SETBACKS
BUILDING TYPES:
FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALK OUT
FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT
SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT
FB = FULL BASEMENT
DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW
4.
5
%
DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPE
(CG)
108.3
FB
100.0
GF=108.5
GENERAL NOTES
FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070.
SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELM CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION (ECWMC).
DENOTES BORROW AREA. AFTER MATERIAL IS REMOVED CONTRACTOR TO BRING BOTTOM OF
POND TO 873.0 WITH GRADING SPOIL.
1.
2.
LEGEND
ESTIMATED QUANTITYSYMBOLDESCRIPTION
910
908
:MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
GRADING NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR GRADING NOTES
EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES.
SEE SHEET C3.2
:Heavy Duty Silt Fence X Feet
:Pavement Sawcut
:Construction Limits
:Wetland Impact Area X Each
3
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
>>
>>
>>
>>
ST
M
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>>>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
ST
M
S
T
M
STM
STM
>
>
>
>
>
>
)))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
))))))
)
))))))
)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 20
21 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 31
32
35
5+0
0
6+00
7+00
8+00
9+
0
0
1
0
+
0
0
11+00
12+00
13+00
14+
0
0
15
+
0
0
1
6
+
0
0
0+
0
0
1+0
0
2+
0
0
3+
0
0
1
4321
5
BLK 1
4
19 20 21 22 23
24
25
CHIPPEWA ROAD
MO
H
A
W
K
D
R
I
V
E
14
+
0
0
15
+
0
0
15
+
5
0
.
4
8
6+
0
0
7+
0
0
7+
5
2
.
2
5
3+00
4+00
4+65.18
POND
(23P)
BTM = 976.00
NWL = 985.00
HWL = 986.54
POND
(9P)
BTM = 976.00
NWL = 985.00
HWL = 987.11
WET 1f
HWL =
985.16
POND 3
HWL =
991.07
WET 1e
HWL = 983.88
WET 2
HWL = 986.27
WET 1d
HWL = 982.55
14
15
16
17
18
POND
(13P)
BTM = 979.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 988.00
35'
35'
3
5
'
2
5
'
2
5
'
35'
50'
25'
35
'
3
0
'
50'
>>
>>
>>
>>
ST
M
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>>>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
ST
M
S
T
M
STM
STM
>
>
>
>
>
>
CABX
W
>>
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
>>
WE
T
L
A
N
D
2
33 33
3333
33
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
e
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
d
WL 1e-1
WL 3
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1f
ST-8
EL=986.2
ST-9
EL=981.2
ST-12
ST-18
EL=982.9
ST-21
EL=982.6
ST-22
EL=985.8
H.P.
91.79
L.P.
90.38
H.P.
93.49
%
4
.
6
%
5
.
4
%5.4
%
3
.
3
90.80
L.P.
%
5.0
%
6.3
%
7.0
L.P.H.P.
L.P.
H.P.
%4.3
%3.5
%
7.
8
%
7.
1
%5.6
%7.2
D
R
O
P
1
C
%2.5
%6.6
DR
O
P
2
C
DR
O
P
2
C
%
2.5
%
3.6
%
2.0
%
2.0 %
2
.
0
%
2
.
0
CL CL
%
7.8
%
7.7
L.P
.
92
.
3
9
%
5
.
6
%4.9
%4.7
%4.8
%
8.
7
EO
F
L.
P
.
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
%
7.
9 %
6.
8
%
6.
6
%9.2
GF = 994.5
EX.CL
993.17
CL CL
%5.0
92.3
89.1
88.5
96
.
0
91.092.0
94
.
0
90.3
92
.
5
89.3
GF
=
9
9
2
.
5
93.5
93.8
93.8
%1.0
87.9
87.9
85.0
85.0
93.0
85.5
85.5
93.0
%
1.2
%
1.
0
G
.
B
.
%1.0
85.0
85.0
91.6
85.2
85.2
%1.0
%
4
.
0
85.2
85.2
93.0
85.5
85.5
%
3
.
0
G.
B
.
93.5
85.5
85.5
92.1
86.5
94
.
3
9
%
1.
0
%
3.
0
987.0
987.0
994.0
986.0
986.0
%1.0 %1.9 %1.0
%0.5
%
4.
1
%
1.
7
4
89
.
5
4
91.7
89.4 89.3
CL CL
93.33
%
1.
0
L.P
.
92
.
4
0
%
2.
0
%
1.
0
92.93
H.P.
%1.0
%5.3
%
8.
1
%
7.1
%1.4
87.5
85.
7
86.
0
8
8
.
0
EOF
86.5
E
O
F
EOF
87.
0
E
O
F
L.P.
91.60
%
1.
5
CL CL
V
M
A
6:1Slope
in buffer
6
:
1
S
l
o
p
e
D
R
O
P
2
C
D
R
O
P
2
C
%0.5
6:1
6:1
88.1
88
.
1
88.1
88.1
8
8
.
1
6
:
1
6
:
1
986
988
990
988
986
988
988
988
986
99
2
988
986
98
6
992
984
984
988986
988
988
988
986
98
6
9
8
8
988
98
6
98
8
986
988
988
6:1
VMA
VM
A
9
8
8
9
8
6
992
984
982
984
988
986
992
9
8
4
9
8
2
99
6
992
992
986
98
8
9
8
6
985
990
992
990
990
990
992
9
8
6
99
0
99
4
9
8
6
98
8
990
990
994
99
2
99
4
9
8
2
9
8
6
9849
9
0
9
8
6
9
9
2
9
8
8
9
9
2
9
8
6
99098
8
986
990
9
9
2
988 994
992
9
9
2
9
9
2
990
98
6
9
9
2
98
6
98
6
9
8
8
990
988
99
2
994
98
6
994
994 988
986
990
992
99
0
9
9
2
99
4
98
8
994
994
996
9
9
0
99
4
9
8
4
9
8
8
988
985
9
8
8
9
8
8
98
5
984
9
8
7
990
98
8
987986
985
987
987
986 987 987
99
2
986
976
980
984
990
983
982
980
978
976
974
99
2
994
984
984
9
8
4
984
992
986
990
9
8
6
9
8
8
9
9
0
986
988988
9
8
8
9
8
4
99
4
990
990
990
990
990
990
990
990
988
979
980
982
984986
992
990
987
988
99
2
99
2
99
0
99
0
985
984
982 980 978 978
986985
984
982
980
978
992
993
9
9
0
99
2
8
8
.
5
G
F
=
9
9
3
.
1
98
7
.
0
FB
W
O
9
8
6
.
5
G
F
=
9
9
5
.
0
9
8
7
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
8
7
.
0
GF=993.0
990.3
SEWO
989.8
G
F
=
9
9
6
.
0
9
8
8
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
8
8
.
0
GF=994.5
991.3
SEWO
990.8
GF=996.5
889.0
FBLO
991.5
GF=997.5
890.0
FBLO
992.5
GF
=
9
9
2
.
8
99
0
.
1
SE
W
O
98
9
.
6
GF
=
9
9
7
.
0
98
9
.
5
FB
W
O
98
9
.
0
G
F
=
9
9
5
.
0
98
8
.
9
F
B
W
O
98
8
.
4
G
F
=
9
9
3
.
0
9
8
6
.
2
F
B
W
O
9
8
5
.
7
GF
=
9
9
4
.
0
986.
5
FB
W
O
986.
0 GF=9
9
4
.
0
986.
5
FBW
O
986.
0
GF
=
9
9
3
.
5
98
6
.
0
FB
W
O
98
5
.
5
G
F
=
9
9
3
.
7
9
8
6
.
2
F
B
W
O
9
8
5
.
7
GF=994.0
986.5
FBWO
986.0
GF
=
9
9
5
.
5
98
8
.
0
FB
W
O
98
7
.
5
G
F
=
9
9
4
.
5
9
8
7
.
0
F
B
9
9
4
.
3
GF=993.5
986.0
FBWO
985.5
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
98
7
.
0
FB
W
O
98
6
.
5
C7.1
3,4&5
INLET
PROTECTION
C7.1
8
EROSION
CONTROL
BLANKET
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
1
SILT FENCE
ENKAMAT (TYP)
C7.1
6
FES EROSION
CONTROL (TYP)
C7.1
9&10
TEMPORARY
COMPOST BIO LOG
ENKAMAT (TYP)
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
1
SILT FENCE
C7.1
3,4&5
INLET
PROTECTION
C7.1
8
EROSION
CONTROL
BLANKET
NORTH
0 50 100
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C302MEH003.dwg
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
C3.2
:Inlet Protection
nn
:Silt Fence
:Pavement Sawcut
:Construction Limits
:Vehicle Tracking Pad
X Each
X Each
X Feet
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
:Compost or Bio Log X Feet)))))))))))))
:Erosion Control Blanket X Each
NO SCALE
TYPICAL LOT DETAIL1
NOTES:
1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY.
: REAR ELEVATION
: BUILDING TYPE - (CUSTOM GRADING BY BUILDER)
: MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION
: FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
: DRP 1' DENOTES DISTANCE GARAGE
FLOOR IS DROPPED FROM TYPICAL.
DRP
1'
MAIN STREET
BLK 1
5
X 105.0 X 105.0
X
106.5
X
106.5
DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNER
ELEVATIONS
DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT
20' FRONT
10' SIDE
10' REAR
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE
DENOTES BUILDING
SETBACKS
BUILDING TYPES:
FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALK OUT
FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT
SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT
FB = FULL BASEMENT
DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW
4.
5
%
DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPE
(CG)
108.3
FB
100.0
GF=108.5
GENERAL NOTES
FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070.
SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELM CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION (ECWMC).
1.
2.
LEGEND
ESTIMATED QUANTITYSYMBOLDESCRIPTION
910
908
:MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)GRADING NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR GRADING NOTES
EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES.
SEE SHEET C3.2
:Heavy Duty Silt Fence X Feet
:Wetland Impact Area X Each
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>
>
)))))
)
)
)
)
)
))))
)
)
)
))))
HH
CABX
DNR WETLAND 27-493W
SOUTH PORTION
OHW = 980.6
FLOODPLAIN = 981.5
( As of 8/10/20)
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
g
>>
980.
6
WE
T
L
A
N
D
5
b
WL
5a
WL 1h
ST-11
EL=997.4
ST-12
EL=990.2
ST-13
EL=991.7
ST-14
EL=988.3
ST-15
EL=989.0
%
6.7
%
6.2
%
8.
7
%5.0
%
4.5
L.P.
EO
F
L.P
.
H.P
.
-0+0
0
1
+
0
0
2+00
3
+
0
0
3+1
4
.
7
3
EO
F
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
%
5.2
%
7.1
%
4.8
%
5.
6
%8.0
%8.0
%
7.
9 %
6.
8
%
6.
6
%9.2
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
GF
=
9
9
3
.
5
CL
C
L
CL CL
90.13
EX.CL
994.86
93
.
5
8
H.P.
90
.
2
8
%8.4
%8.4
%8.5
%3.8
DR
P
1C
92.3
88.5
96.5
%
6.2
96
.
0
94
.
0
92
.
5
GF
=
9
9
2
.
5
GF =
9
9
2
.
5
93
.
6
1
%
1.2
5
%
2.2
G.
B
.
%
2.
9
91
.
7
8
%
4.
1
94.54
91.7
95.8
89.5
97.5 95.1
89.5
95.5
88.5
94.2
91.9
950
95.2
94.5
95.0
95.5
92.6
94.0
91.1
92.8
85.5
86.0
87.0
87.5
90
.
7
92.
2
90.0
93.8
93.
9
94.
5
93.
5
94.
0
92.
6
93.
5
86
.
0
92
.
1
93
.
0
89
.
0
9
9
4
.
1
90.5
92.0
90.5
94.
6
5
H.P.
%
1.0
%
1.3
G.
B
.
%
1.0
92.
2
9
95
.
7
93.5
%
7.1
%
4.8
%3.2
%
3.3
%
4
.
2
%
4.2
%
6.8
93
.
0
94.
6
95.
7
95.095.5
9
5
.
1
9
5
.
5
94
.
7
95
.
5
94
.
1
95
.
5
94.1
93.5
92.7 91.2
90.3
90.4
93.1
91.1
94
.
3
94
.
5
95.
2
97.
5
%
7.4
86.5
89.5
87.5
88.
0
88.2
87.7
87.7
87.7 87.7
L.P.
91.9
0
%2.8
%
0.
6
H.
P
.
93
.
8
5
93.34
93.33
%2.0
91.2
0
L.P.
%
1.
0
92.93
H.P.
%1.0
%3.8
%5.3
%2.2
%5.1
%
7.1
%1.4
%4.7
%
4
.
9
%
-
2
.
0
%
0
.
4
%
2
.
5
%2.3
87.
8
88
.
1
85
.
9
83.
7
86.1
84.0
82.2
82.4
82.
9
84.
2
84.
0
85.
7
86.
1
86.
1
86.3
87.5
8
6
.
0
8
6
.
7
86.4
8
4
.
8
86.
5
87.0
87.0 86.3
8
5
.
0
8
5
.
0
8
4
.
5
86.0
86.5
88.0
87.5
85.
7
86.
0
93.7
9
86
.
7
86
.
7
86
.
7
86.
7
E
O
F
87.8
EO
F
86
.
2
E
O
F
87.
3
0
E
O
F
L.P
.
%2.0 %2.0
%
1.
0
%
1.0
91.
8
0
%
1.2
5
%
3.3
CL CL
VM
A
%
8.
0
E
O
F
8
9
.
5
85.9
VM
A
G
B
%
3.0
9
8
8
9
8
6
9
9
4
988
992
98
4
992994
992
994
9
9
2
988
992
988
990
98
8
988
98
6
994
992
99
0
986
986
986
984
982
980
98
6
980
982
984
98
6
9
8
6
992
99
4
99
6
996 994
9
8
6
986
98
0
98
4
98
6
990
99
0
9
8
4
984
992
990
990
994
98
6
98
6
99
2
98
6
98
6
99
4
99
4
9
9
2
994
986
99
0
9
8
8
98
8
992
99
0
990
98
8
9
9
2
988987
98
5
984
9
8
7
990
98
8
98
6
986
98
6
988
988
99
2
992
99
2
98
4
978
99
2
9
9
4
9
9
4
994
98
8
98
6
98
4
.
5
9
8
6
9
8
8
984 983
982
980
978
976 976
980
983
984
985
990
994
988
98
6
986
986
990 994
98
8
98
6
988
994
98
8
97
6
97
8
98
0
98
2
98
3
98
4
985
98
5
986 985
984
986
97
7
DRO
P
2C
DR
O
P
2C
99
2
99
2
99
4
99
2
99
2
99
4
99
6
975
98
6
98
8
99
0
988
990
VMA
GF=993.0
990.3
SEWO
989.8
G
F
=
9
9
6
.
0
98
8
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
8
8
.
0
GF=994.5
991.3
SEWO
990.8
GF
=
9
9
7
.
0
98
9
.
5
FB
W
O
98
9
.
0
GF=996.5
889.0
FBLO
991.5
GF=997.5
890.0
FBLO
992.5
GF
=
9
9
6
.
0
988
.
5
FB
W
O
98
8
.
0
GF
=
9
9
6
.
2
98
8
.
7
FB
W
O
98
8
.
2
GF=99
6
.
7
989.2FBWO
988.7
GF
=
9
9
6
.
5
989
.
0
FB
W
O
98
8
.
5
GF
=
9
9
8
.
0
99
0
.
5
FB
W
O
99
0
.
0
GF
=
9
9
8
.
0
99
0
.
5
FB
W
O
99
0
.
0
GF
=
9
9
7
.
0
98
9
.
5
FB
W
O
98
9
.
0
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
0
99
0
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
9
0
.
0
GF=
9
9
5
.
0
987.
5
FB
W
O
987.
0
G
F
=
9
9
8
.
0
9
9
0
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
9
0
.
0
GF
=
9
9
5
.
5
98
8
.
0
FB
W
O
98
7
.
5
GF
=
9
9
6
.
0
98
8
.
5
FB
W
O
98
8
.
0
GF
=
9
9
5
.
0
98
7
.
5
FB
W
O
98
7
.
0
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
98
7
.
0
FB
W
O
98
6
.
5
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
98
7
.
0
FB
W
O
98
6
.
5
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
98
7
.
0
FB
L
O
98
9
.
5
GF
=
9
9
6
.
2
98
8
.
7
FB
W
O
98
8
.
2
99
3
.
3
98
6
.
5
FB
W
O
98
6
.
0
G
F
=
9
9
6
.
2
9
8
8
.
7
F
B
W
O
9
8
8
.
2
GF
=
9
9
6
.
2
988
.
7
FB
W
O
98
8
.
2
GF
=
9
9
5
.
0
98
7
.
5
FB
W
O
98
7
.
0
FBL
O991
.
0
GF=
9
9
4
.
6
988
.
5FBL
O991
.
0
88.5
96.5
88.5
96.3
86.
1
85.4
992
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
1
7
8
9
3
4
2
1
432
3
1
2 1
4
2
3
BLK 6
BLK 5
1
2
3
45
6
7
8 9
10
424
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33 BLK 8 -0+22 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00
5+00
-0+2
8
0+0
0
1+0
0
2+0
0
2+3
7
.
0
2
6+0
0
7+
0
0
8+
0
0
9+
0
0
10
+
0
0
11
+
0
0
12
+
0
0
13
+
0
0
14
+
0
0
-0+50 0+00 1+00
2+
0
0
3+
0
0
4+
0
0
5+
0
0
-0+20 0+00
1+00
2+
0
0
3+00
4+00
4+65.18
FILTRATION
BASIN (16P)
BTM = 984.50
HWL = 987.61
POND
(18P)
BTM = 978.00
NWL = 986.00
HWL = 987.42
POND
(20P)
BTM = 975.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 986.33
POND
(14P)
BTM = 980.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 988.42
WET 1h
HWL = 983.89
WET 5b
HWL = 983.38
100-YR B-B = 985.00
W
E
T
5
a
H
W
L
=
9
8
3
.
3
8
1
0
0
-
Y
R
B
-
B
=
9
8
5
.
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
5
0
'
50
'
25
'
35'25
'
25
'
35
'
35
'
50'
2
5
'
25'
25'
25'
2
5
'
50'
15'
3
0
'
50'
59'
BLK
3
C7.1
3,4&5
INLET
PROTECTION
C7.1
6
FES EROSION
CONTROL (TYP)C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
1
SILT FENCE
MO
H
A
W
K
R
O
A
D
C7.1
8
EROSION
CONTROL
BLANKET
LA
N
E
BR
O
O
K
V
I
E
W
C
O
U
R
T
MEADOWVIEW COURT
C7.1
1
SILT
FENCE
C7.1
7
ROCK
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
C7.1
6
FES EROSION
CONTROL (TYP)
ENTRANCE
HIL
L
S
I
D
E
C7.1
3, 4 & 5
INLET
PROTECTION
NORTH
0 50 100
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C303MEH003.dwg
GRADING , DRAINAGE AND
EROSION CONTROL
C3.3
:Inlet Protection
nn
:Silt Fence
:Pavement Sawcut
:Construction Limits
:Vehicle Tracking Pad
X Each
X Each
X Feet
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
:Compost or Bio Log X Feet)))))))))))))
:Erosion Control Blanket X Each
NO SCALE
TYPICAL LOT DETAIL1
NOTES:
1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY.
: REAR ELEVATION
: BUILDING TYPE - (CUSTOM GRADING BY BUILDER)
: MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION
: FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
: DRP 1' DENOTES DISTANCE GARAGE
FLOOR IS DROPPED FROM TYPICAL.
DRP
1'
MAIN STREET
BLK 1
5
X 105.0 X 105.0
X
106.5
X
106.5
DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNER
ELEVATIONS
DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT
20' FRONT
10' SIDE
10' REAR
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE
DENOTES BUILDING
SETBACKS
BUILDING TYPES:
FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALK OUT
FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT
SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT
FB = FULL BASEMENT
DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW
4.
5
%
DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPE
(CG)
108.3
FB
100.0
GF=108.5
GENERAL NOTES
FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070.
SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELM CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION (ECWMC).
1.
2.
LEGEND
ESTIMATED QUANTITYSYMBOLDESCRIPTION
910
908
:MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)GRADING NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR GRADING NOTES
EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES.
SEE SHEET C3.4
:Heavy Duty Silt Fence X Feet
:Wetland Impact Area X Each
SEE SHEET C3.2
SE
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
3
.
7
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
))))
CABX
CABX
C
A
B
X
CA
B
X
HH
INV=981.53
CMP INV 36
INV=981.87
CMP INV 36
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OT
V
O
T
V
>>
DNR WETLAND 27-493W
SOUTH PORTION
OHW = 980.6
FLOODPLAIN = 981.5
( As of 8/10/20)
17
0
33
33
33
980.
6
980.
6
WE
T
L
A
N
D
4
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1a
-
S
o
u
t
h
ST-16
EL=990.5
30152
981.48
INV 36IN CMP
RE=982.28
INV 12IN CMP
RE=982.70
INV 12IN CMP
30312
981.82
INV 36IN CMP
L.P.
%
7.
1
%
7
.
1
%
7
.
5
%
7
.
1
%
7.
4
%
5.
0
%
5.
6
%
5
.
1
%
5
.
6
EX.CL
990.50
88.12
%1.0
%1.0
92
.
1
93
.
0
89
.
0
9
2
.
7
x
x
x
x
93.
3
9
2
.
6
95.
1
93.8
9
0
.
9
91.8
8
9
.
1
9
0
.
5
8
8
.
5
90.3
9
0
.
5
90.3
89.6
88.9
91.
7
9
0
.
7
87.5
92.8
9
9
4
.
1
90.5
85.
7
87
.
5
95.
7
9
7
.
8
9
7
.
9
8
9
.
0
8
6
.
5
8
5
.
6
86.1
86.
1
86.
7
86.
7
86.7
H.P
.
%
2.9
92.5
5
%
1.0
V
M
A
2.0%
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
DRO
P
1C
2.0%
2.0%
>
>
>
>
>
>988
99
0
990
988
986
988
988
988
986
988
988
99
2
983
984
985
98
6
986
985
984 983
980
976
975
978
980
982983
984
986
988
98
5
98
5
98
7
9
8
5
98
6
9
8
6
98
7
9
8
7
99
2
990
990
994
994
994
9
9
4
994
990
994
994
988
9
9
0
DRO
P
2C
DR
O
P
2C
GF=
9
9
1
.
2
988
.
5SEW
O988
.
0
GF=99
1
.
0
983.5
FB
990.8
GF
=
9
9
4
.
5
98
7
.
0
FB
L
O
98
9
.
5
GF=
9
9
4
.
0
986
.
5
FB
993
.
8
GF=
9
9
5
.
1
988
.
3
FB
995
.
6
GF=
9
9
4
.
5
987
.
0
FB
994
.
3
GF=
9
9
2
.
5
985.
0
FB
992.
3
GF=991.0
983.5
FB
990.8
GF=
9
9
4
.
6
988
.
5FBL
O991
.
0
GF=
9
9
4
.
6
988
.
5FBL
O991
.
0
9
4
.
2
7
6
5
4
8
9
BLK
4
1
2
10
-0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00
3+00
4+00
5+0
0
PROPOSED 100-YR
HWL = 981.83
OUTLOT C
WET 4
HWL = 985.01
OUTLOT D
50'
50'
50
'
B
U
F
F
E
R
3
0
'
30'
25'
C7.1
3,4&5
INLET
PROTECTION
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
1
SILT
FENCE
MO
H
A
W
K
R
O
A
D
C7.1
6
FES EROSION
CONTROL (TYP)
LAN
E
HILL
S
I
D
E
C7.1
9&10
TEMPORARY
COMPOST
BIO LOG
OHW
C7.1
7
ROCK
CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
NORTH
0 50 100
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C304MEH003.dwg
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
C3.4
:Inlet Protection
nn
:Silt Fence
:Pavement Sawcut
:Construction Limits
:Vehicle Tracking Pad
X Each
X Each
X Feet
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
:Compost or Bio Log X Feet)))))))))))))
:Erosion Control Blanket X Each
NO SCALE
TYPICAL LOT DETAIL1
NOTES:
1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY.
: REAR ELEVATION
: BUILDING TYPE - (CUSTOM GRADING BY BUILDER)
: MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION
: FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
: DRP 1' DENOTES DISTANCE GARAGE
FLOOR IS DROPPED FROM TYPICAL.
DRP
1'
MAIN STREET
BLK 1
5
X 105.0 X 105.0
X
106.5
X
106.5
DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNER
ELEVATIONS
DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT
20' FRONT
10' SIDE
10' REAR
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE
DENOTES BUILDING
SETBACKS
BUILDING TYPES:
FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALK OUT
FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT
SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT
FB = FULL BASEMENT
DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW
4.
5
%
DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPE
(CG)
108.3
FB
100.0
GF=108.5
GENERAL NOTES
FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070.
SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELM CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION (ECWMC).
1.
2.
LEGEND
ESTIMATED QUANTITYSYMBOLDESCRIPTION
910
908
:MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)GRADING NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR GRADING NOTES
EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES.
:Heavy Duty Silt Fence X Feet
:Wetland Impact Area X Each
SEE SHEET C3.2
INV=984.36
INV 27 RCP
INV=982.56
INV 27IN RCP
INV=984.16
FES 18IN RCP CBMH CL
RE=992.2
INV=990.14
FES 15IN RCP
>>
DNR WETLAND 27-493W
NORTH PORTION
OHW = 978.3
FLOODPLAIN = 979.2
( As of 8/10/20)
ST-6
EL=984.8
ST-7
EL=983.7
974
976
978
980
982
984
98
0
980
982
9
8
0
9
8
2
77
BLOCK 7
PROPOSED 100-YR
HWL = 979.08
WET 1b1
HWL = 980.63
BTM = 974.00
NWL = 979.50
HWL = 980.21
POND (1P)
35'
50'
HA
C
K
A
M
O
R
E
D
R
I
V
E
NORTH
0 50 100
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C305MEH003.dwg
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
C3.5
:Inlet Protection
nn
:Silt Fence
:Pavement Sawcut
:Construction Limits
:Vehicle Tracking Pad
X Each
X Each
X Feet
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
:Compost or Bio Log X Feet)))))))))))))
:Erosion Control Blanket X Each
NO SCALE
TYPICAL LOT DETAIL1
NOTES:
1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY.
: REAR ELEVATION
: BUILDING TYPE - (CUSTOM GRADING BY BUILDER)
: MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION
: FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
: DRP 1' DENOTES DISTANCE GARAGE
FLOOR IS DROPPED FROM TYPICAL.
DRP
1'
MAIN STREET
BLK 1
5
X 105.0 X 105.0
X
106.5
X
106.5
DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNER
ELEVATIONS
DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT
20' FRONT
10' SIDE
10' REAR
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE
DENOTES BUILDING
SETBACKS
BUILDING TYPES:
FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALK OUT
FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT
SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT
FB = FULL BASEMENT
DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW
4.
5
%
DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPE
(CG)
108.3
FB
100.0
GF=108.5
GENERAL NOTES
FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070.
SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELM CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION (ECWMC).
1.
2.
LEGEND
ESTIMATED QUANTITYSYMBOLDESCRIPTION
910
908
:MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)GRADING NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR GRADING NOTES
EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES.
:Heavy Duty Silt Fence X Feet
:Wetland Impact Area X Each
SEE SHEET C3.6
SE
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
3
.
1
>>
ST
M
ST
M
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
)
)
)
)
)))
)
)
)
)
))))
)
)
)
)))))
)
)
))))))
)
))))))
)
)))))))
)))))))
))))))
)
>>
ST
M
ST
M
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
INV=1003.07
INV 12IN HDPE CPP
INV=1001.95
INV 12IN HDPE CPP
980.6
98
0
.
6
980.6
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1c
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1a
-
N
o
r
t
h
MB
1453
1454
1455
1457
1458
1459
14601461
14621463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
14781479
1480
1481
1482
1483 1484 1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
14901491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496 1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504150515061507
1508
1509
1510 1511
1512
ST-10
EL=981.7
ST-20
EL=982.6
L.P.
87.01
H.P.
92.88
%5.6
%7.2
%6.6
D
R
O
P
2C
D
R
O
P
2
C
92.75
CL CL
97.1
85.5
86.0
86.0
92.1
86.5
86.5
%0.9
%0.9
%
3.
0
G
.
B
.
%
2
.
5
1000.0
87.5
84.0
85.
8
8
4
.
3
91.99
994.0+/-%
2.0
%
5.0
998.0+/-
EOF
8
5
.
5
EOF
84.9
E
O
F
V
M
A
6:1Slope
in buffer
986
986
982
992
99
8
1
0
0
0
9
9
2
99
2
98
4
98
8
990
984
988
998
1
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
990
988
988
988
988
992
984
982
984
982
982
984
986986
984
986
984
982
982
982
986
988
984
98
8
9
8
8
9
8
6
984
98
8
9
8
6
985
990
9
8
2
9
8
6
984
992
9
8
4
9
9
2
990
98
6
985
983
982
980
978
976
974
98
8
990
990
988
990
986
990
986
986
986
986
994
998
1002
1
0
0
2
9
9
6
8
6
.
5
86.
5
86.
5
86.5
86
.
5
8
6
.
5
86
.
5
994
996
982
.
5
982.5
98
4
984
981
.
5
980
978
976
976
980
986
9
8
6
9
8
4
9
8
2
98
4
986 9
8
8
982
974
9
7
3
.
5
9
9
0
VM
A
9
9
8
9
9
6
9
9
4
994
996
9
9
4
9
9
6
996
994
992
986
986
986
986
G
F
=
9
9
3
.
1
98
7
.
0
FB
W
O
9
8
6
.
5
G
F
=
9
9
5
.
0
9
8
7
.
5
F
B
W
O
9
8
7
.
0
32
33
34
35
36
1
POND
(5P)
BTM = 974.00
NWL = 983.00
HWL = 984.65
POND
(12P)
BTM = 973.50
WET 1c
HWL =
981.76
WET 1a-North
HWL = 979.08
POND
(13P)
BTM = 979.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 988.00
50'
50'
30'
3
0
'
CHIPPE
W
A
ROAD
C7.1
1
SILT FENCE
C7.1
1
SILT FENCE
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
C7.1
6
FES EROSION
CONTROL (TYP)
C7.1
6
FES EROSION
CONTROL (TYP)
ENKAMAT (TYP)
C7.1
9&10
TEMPORARY
COMPOST BIO LOG
C7.1
9&10
TEMPORARY
COMPOST BIO LOG
C7.1
8
EROSION
CONTROL
BLANKET
C7.1
2
SILT FENCE
HEAVY DUTY
NORTH
0 50 100
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C306MEH003.dwg
GRADING, DRAINAGE &
EROSION CONTROL
C3.6
:Inlet Protection
nn
:Silt Fence
:Pavement Sawcut
:Construction Limits
:Vehicle Tracking Pad
X Each
X Each
X Feet
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
:Compost or Bio Log X Feet)))))))))))))
:Erosion Control Blanket X Each
NO SCALE
TYPICAL LOT DETAIL1
NOTES:
1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY.
: REAR ELEVATION
: BUILDING TYPE - (CUSTOM GRADING BY BUILDER)
: MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION
: FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
: DRP 1' DENOTES DISTANCE GARAGE
FLOOR IS DROPPED FROM TYPICAL.
DRP
1'
MAIN STREET
BLK 1
5
X 105.0 X 105.0
X
106.5
X
106.5
DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNER
ELEVATIONS
DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT
20' FRONT
10' SIDE
10' REAR
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE
DENOTES BUILDING
SETBACKS
BUILDING TYPES:
FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALK OUT
FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT
SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT
FB = FULL BASEMENT
DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW
4.
5
%
DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPE
(CG)
108.3
FB
100.0
GF=108.5
GENERAL NOTES
FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070.
SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELM CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION (ECWMC).
1.
2.
LEGEND
ESTIMATED QUANTITYSYMBOLDESCRIPTION
910
908
:MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED)
:MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)
:MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING)GRADING NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR GRADING NOTES
EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES.
:Heavy Duty Silt Fence X Feet
:Erosion Control Blanket
:Wetland Impact Area X Each
SE
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
3
.
2
SEE SHEET C3.5
SEE SHEET C3.7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 20
21 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
6364
6566
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
BLOCK 7
42
0+00 1+00 2+00
0+
0
0
1+
0
0
2+
0
0
3+
0
0
4
+
0
0
5+0
0
6+00
7+00
8+00
9+
0
0
1
0
+
0
0
11+00
12+00
13+00
14
+
0
0
15
+
0
0
1
6
+
0
0
1
7
+
0
0
18+
0
0
19
+
0
0
2
0
+
0
0
2
1
+
0
0
2
2
+
0
0
2
3
+
0
0
2
4
+
0
0
25+0026+0027+0028+00
29+
0
0
30
+
0
0
31
+
0
0
31
+
1
7
.
8
7
77
0+
0
0
1+0
0
2+
0
0
3+
0
0
1
2
3
432
3
1
BLK 6
5
BLK 1
4
19 20 21 22 23
24
25
26
27
CHIPPEWA ROAD
MO
H
A
W
K
D
R
I
V
E
33 BLK 8
BLOCK 7
-0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
15+00
16+00
17+00
18+00
19+00 20+00
21+00
22+
0
0
23
+
0
0
2
4
+
0
0
2
5
+
0
0
2
6
+
0
0
2
7
+
0
0
-0+22 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00
5+00
13
+
0
0
14
+
0
0
15
+
0
0
15
+
5
0
.
4
8
5+
0
0
6+
0
0
7+
0
0
7+
5
2
.
2
5
2+
0
0
3+00
4+00
4+65.18
POND
(23P)
BTM = 973.00
NWL = 982.00
HWL = 984.33
100 YR B-B = 985.15
IRRIGATION POND
(1P)
BTM = 976.00
NWL = 985.00
HWL = 986.54
POND
(9P)
BTM = 976.00
NWL = 985.00
HWL = 987.11
POND
(5P)
BTM = 974.00
NWL = 983.00
HWL = 984.65
POND
(12P)
BTM = 973.50
NWL = 982.50
HWL = 984.98
MEADOWVIEW
WET 1f
HWL =
985.16
POND 3
HWL =
991.07
WET 1e
HWL = 983.88
WET 2
HWL = 986.27
WET 1d
HWL = 982.55
WET 1c
HWL =
981.76
WET 1a-North
HWL = 979.08
WET 1b1
HWL = 980.63
WET 1b
HWL = 981.63
COURT
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
BTM = 974.00
NWL = 979.50
HWL = 980.21
POND (1P)
POND
(13P)
BTM = 979.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 988.00
CABX
993.2
993.1
INV=990.15
FES 15 RCP
INV=990.82
FES 15 RCP
CABX
CB RECT
RE=991.1
W
SSMH
RE=1005.5
IE=974.93
SSMH
RE=996.8
IE=975.43
SSMH
RE=989.8
IE=976.44
INV=982.56
INV 27IN RCP
INV=984.16
FES 18IN RCP
>>
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
OE OE OE OE
>>
>>
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I
I
I I I
EX. MH 4A
RIM:982.74
INV:979.88(N)
INV:979.88(E)
INV:979.78(S)
28' L 8" PVC
SDR 26 @ 0.4%
STUB 4C
INV:979.88
EX. MH 3
RIM:990.71
INV:979.25(N)
INV:979.25(W)
INV:979.25(E)
INV:979.15(S)
28' L 8" PVC
SDR 26 @ 0.4%
STUB 4C
INV:979.36
I I
EX. MH 2
RIM:987.30
INV:978.20(N)
INV:978.20(E)
INV:978.10(S)
EX. MH 1
RIM:986.42
INV:977.20(N)
INV:977.20(E)
INV:977.10(S)
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:992.55
INV:976.35
29' L 8" PVC
SDR 26 @ 0.4%
STUB 4C
INV:977.32
29' L 8" PVC
SDR 26 @ 0.4%
STUB 4C
INV:978.31
>>
>>
III
33 33
3333
3333
33
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
INV=990.47
FES 15 IN PVC
INV=990.09
FES RCP 15 IN
RE=992.02
STMH
MB
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ST-1
EL=990.6
ST-2
EL=990.4
ST-3
EL=987.4
ST-4
EL=983.8
ST-5
EL=982.2
ST-8
EL=986.2
ST-9
EL=981.2
ST-10
EL=981.7
ST-11
EL=997.4
ST-12
EL=990.2
ST-6EL=984.8
ST-7
EL=983.7
ST-17
EL=982.1
ST-18
EL=982.9
ST-19
EL=983.8
ST-20
EL=982.6
ST-21
EL=982.6
ST-22
EL=985.8
MH 16
RIM: 997.88
BUILD: 8.6'
INV: 989.26
MH 15
RIM: 996.67
BUILD: 8.7'
INL (N): 988.07
INV: 987.97 MH 14
RIM: 997.44
BUILD: 10.0'
INL (NW): 987.51
INV: 987.41
MH 13
RIM: 996.22
BUILD: 9.4'
INL (NW): 986.95
INV: 986.85
MH 12
RIM: 995.72
BUILD: 9.4'
INL (NW): 986.44
INV: 986.34
MH 11
RIM: 995.89
BUILD: 10.2'
INL (NW): 985.81
INV: 985.71
MH 10
RIM: 993.20
BUILD: 8.0'
INL (N): 985.28
INV: 985.18
MH 9
RIM: 992.20
BUILD: 8.0'
INL (N): 984.30
INV: 984.20
MH 7
RIM: 992.59
BUILD: 10.5'
INL (SE): 982.19
INV: 982.09
MH 5
RIM: 991.71
BUILD: 11.3'
INL (E): 980.51
INL (NW): 980.51
INV: 980.41
MH 17
RIM: 993.08
BUILD: 12.0'
INL (N): 981.15
INV: 981.05
MH 18
RIM: 993.93
BUILD: 12.5'
INL (N): 981.55
INV: 981.45
MH 19
RIM: 993.56
BUILD: 11.3'
INL (N): 982.33
INV: 982.23
MH 20
RIM: 995.80
BUILD: 11.9'
INL (N): 984.03
INV: 983.93
8"
S
A
N
@
0
.
4
0
%
8"
S
A
N
@
0
.
4
0
%
8
"
S
A
N
@
0
.
4
0
%
8"
S
A
N
@
0
.
4
0
%
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
8" SAN
@ 0.40%
8" SA
N
@ 0.4
0
%
8" SAN
@
0
.
4
0
%
8" S
A
N
@ 0.
4
0
%
8
"
S
A
N
@
0
.
4
0
%
8
"
S
A
N
@
0
.
4
0
%
8"
S
A
N
@
0
.
4
0
%
8"
S
A
N
@
0
.
4
0
%
8
"
S
A
N
@
0
.
4
0
%
8
"
S
A
N
@
0
.
4
0
%
1
2
"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8
"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8" PVC C900
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
12"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
12
"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
12" PVC C900
8"
S
A
N
@
0
.
4
0
%
8" S
A
N
@ 0
.
4
0
%
8"
S
A
N
@
0
.
4
0
%
8" SAN
@ 0.40%8" SAN
@ 0.40%
MH 4
RIM: 988.00
BUILD: 8.3'
INL (N): 979.84
INV: 979.74
MH 3
RIM: 992.91
BUILD: 14.0'
INL (NE): 978.98
INV: 978.88
MH 2
RIM: 990.65
BUILD: 12.9'
INL (N): 977.89
INV: 977.79
INL: 976.45 (E)
12" PVC C900
12" PVC C900
MH 1
RIM: 990.73
BUILD: 13.4'
INL (E): 977.40
INL (S): 977.40
INV: 977.30
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
ST
M
ST
M
>
>
S
T
M
S
T
M
ST
M
STM
STM
S
T
M
STM
S
T
M
S
T
M
ST
M
>>
>>
ST
M
>>
ST
M
>>>>
OCS 1
RIM (HIGH): 985.00
INL (NW): 980.00
INV: 982.00
BOTTOM: 979.00
FES 1
INV=981.70ST
M
ST
M
15
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
4
2
%
15" RCP
@ 0.35%>>
OCS 2
RIM (HIGH): 985.50
INL (N): 981.00
INV: 983.00
BOTTOM: 980.00
FES 2
INV=982.90
FES 4
INV=984.90
OCS 4
RIM (HIGH): 987.50
INL (SE): 983.00
INV: 985.00
BOTTOM: 982.00
15" RCP
@ 0.27%
12" RCP
@ 0.34%
OCS 3
RIM (HIGH): 987.17
INL (N): 983.00
INV: 985.00
BOTTOM: 982.00
FES 3
INV=984.90
>>
OCS 9
RIM: 987.00
INL (NE): 982.50
INV: 984.50
BOTTOM: 981.50
FES 9
INV=984.60
15" RCP
@ 2.34%
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>STM STM
CB 102B
RIM: 991.39
INV: 987.22
CB 102A
RIM: 991.39
INV: 987.25
STMH 102
RIM: 991.42
INL (S): 987.20
INL (N): 987.10
INL (W): 984.00
INV: 983.80 CBMH 101
RIM: 991.80
INL (W): 983.49
INV: 983.49
SUMP: 979.58
CB 103B
RIM: 992.00
INV: 987.97
FES 103A
INV=990.00
STMH 103
RIM: 994.27
INL (N): 987.80
INL (SW): 984.60
INV: 984.60
FES 100
INV=982.00
18" RCP
@ 1.00%
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
4
1
%
1
5
"
R
C
P
@ 1
0
.
9
9
%
15" RCP
@ 0.41%
18" RCP
@ 0.55%
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
4
1
%
15" RCP
@ 0.40%
CBMH 601
RIM: 992.84
INL (N): 988.59
INV: 982.34
SUMP: 978.34
CB 601A
RIM: 992.85
INV: 988.71
FES 600
INV=982.00
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
4
0
%
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
4
0
%
FES 500
INV=982.00
18" RCP
@ 1.00%
15" RCP
@ 0.40%
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
4
0
%
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
4
0
%
15
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
4
1
%
15" RCP
@ 0.40%
CBMH 501
RIM: 995.42
INL (S): 983.79
INL (E): 990.31
INV: 983.59
SUMP: 979.59
CB 501A
RIM: 995.42
INV: 990.43
CBMH 502
RIM: 996.38
INL (SE): 984.27
INV: 984.27
CBMH 503
RIM: 996.04
INL (SE): 985.00
INV: 985.00
CB 504A
RIM: 995.04
INV: 990.93
CBMH 504
RIM: 995.04
INL (NE): 990.81
INV: 985.51
FES X
INV=982.00
CBMH 201
RIM: 991.78
INL (SE): 983.44
INV: 983.44
SUMP: 978.65
CB 202A
RIM: 991.03
INV: 986.85
21
"
R
C
P
@ 0.
8
0
%
21"
R
C
P
@
0
.
2
7
%
15" RCP
@ 0.40%
FES 400
INV=983.00
CBMH 401
RIM: 990.13
INL (W): 986.12
INL (S): 986.12
INV: 983.12
SUMP: 979.11
CB 401A
RIM: 990.23
INV: 986.22
15" RCP
@ 0.34%
18" RCP
@ 0.24%
CB 206A
RIM: 989.81
INV: 985.78
CBMH 206
RIM: 989.81
INL (N): 985.69
INV: 985.69
SUMP" 979.77
>>
15" RCP
@ 0.30%
HYD.
HYD.
HYD.
HYD.
HYD.
HYD.
HYD.
HYD.
HYD.
>>
FES 800
INV: 989.80
FES 801
INV: 988.00
24" RCP
@ 0.27%
>>
>>
>>>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
FES 3001
INV=978.99
FES 3000
INV: 980.00
>>
36" RCP
@ 1.03%
INV=980.00
INV=980.00
INV=980.75
INV=980.75
98' - 96"Wx36"H RCP
BOX CULVERT @ 0.67%
FES 304
INV: 981.00
FES 302
INV: 981.00
FES 303
INV: 981.80
FES 305
INV: 981.80
18" ARCH RCP
@ 0.48%
18" RCP
@ 0.48%
CB 401B
RIM: 990.25
INV: 986.15
15" RCP
@ 0.50%
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8
"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8" P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
12" P
V
C
C
9
0
0
12"x12" WETTAP
WITH VALVE
TIE 10" SAN. SEWER
INTO EXIST. MH
8"x12" WETTAP
WITH 12" GV
8"
S
A
N
@
0
.
4
0
%
12"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
CBMH 903
RIM: 991.82
INL (W): 987.59
INV: 987.59
CB 903A
RIM: 991.82
INV: 987.77
CBMH 902
RIM: 991.92
INL (W): 987.50
INL (N): 986.90
INV: 986.90CB 902A
RIM: 991.92
INV: 987.62
STMH 901
RIM: 990.00
INL (W): 985.85
INV: 985.85
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
6
0
%
15" RCP
@ 0.60%
15" RCP
@ 0.50%
15" R
C
P
@ 0.6
0
%
STUB
INV: 984.11
>>>>STM
STM
>>
>>
S
T
M
>
>
>
>
ST
M
>>
>>CBMH 205
RIM: 990.41
INL (SE): 985.40
INV: 985.40
CBMH 204
RIM: 991.77
INL (SE): 985.02
INV: 984.82
STMH 203
RIM: 993.52
INL (E): 984.47
INV: 984.47
CBMH 202
RIM: 989.35
INL (N): 986.73
INL (E): 983.93
INV: 983.73
18" RCP
@ 0.25%
18"
R
C
P
@ 0.
2
5
%
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
3
2
%
15"
R
C
P
@ 0
.
3
3
%
MH 8
RIM: 991.31
BUILD: 8.7'
INV: 982.64
MH 6
RIM: 993.39
BUILD: 12.1'
INL (E): 981.41
INV: 981.31
>>
>>
FES 1401
INV: 984.02
FES 1400
INV:982.50
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
2
0
%
1
2
"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
>>
>>
STM
ST
M
CB 1701
RIM: 991.80
INV: 984.31
15" R
C
P
@ 1.30%
FES 1700
INV:982.50
98' - 96"Wx36"H RCP
BOX CULVERT @ 0.67%
970
975
980
985
990
995
1000
970
975
980
985
990
995
1000
MH 9
RIM: 992.20
BUILD: 8.0'
INL (N): 984.30
INV: 984.20
MH 10
RIM: 993.20
BUILD: 8.0'
INL (N): 985.28
INV: 985.18
222' - 8" PVC @ 0.40%
12"x8" TEE
LOWER WATERMAIN TO AVOID STORM
SEWER CROSSING CONFLICTS
2 - 18" RCP
STORM
X-ING'S
EXISTING GROUND
FINISHED GROUND
8" C900 PVC
WATERMAIN
MAINT. 7.5'
MIN. COVER
OVER
WATERMAIN
98
2
.
0
98
1
.
9
6
98
2
.
1
98
2
.
0
6
98
2
.
4
98
2
.
4
2
98
2
.
8
98
2
.
8
2
98
3
.
2
98
3
.
2
5
98
3
.
6
98
3
.
6
4
98
4
.
0
98
3
.
9
9
98
4
.
6
98
4
.
5
5
98
5
.
2
98
5
.
2
0
-0+25 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 2+75
INSULATE
STORM SEWER
X-INGS
STORM
X-ING
NORTH
0 100 200
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C401MEH003.dwg
UTILITY PLAN
NORTH
C4.1
?
SEE
D
E
T
A
I
L
Pipe Materials
Watermain 6" DIP Class 52-Hydrant Leads, 8" PVC C900 & 12" PVC C900 -Main Lines
(ANSI A21.51/AWWA C151)
Water Service 1" Copper Type K (ASTM B88)
Sanitary Sewer 8" PVC SDR 35 (ASTM: D3034, D2665, & F891)
Sanitary Sewer Service 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 (ASTM: D1785, D3034, D2665, & F891)
Storm Sewer RCP 12"-18" CLASS 5 (ASTM C76)
RCP 21" CLASS 4 (ASTM C76)
RCP 24"-48" CLASS 3 (ASTM C76)
Draintile 6" Perforated Draintile 1' Behind Curb with a 6"x4" Tee & 4" PVC To Property Line For Home
Sump Pump Connection
Contact Utility Service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning.
Contractor to field verify location and elevation of all utility points of connection prior to construction of any proposed utilities.
Contractor to notify Engineer immediately if there is any discrepancy.
Contractor to pothole all utility crossings prior to construction of new utilities to verify depths of existing lines. Contact Engineer
immediately if any conflicts are discovered.
Provide means and measures to protect adjacent property from damage during utility installation.
Pipe lengths shown are from center of structure to center of structure or end of end section.
Install tracer wire with all non-conductive utilities in accordance with City of Medina Standards.
Connect to City Utilities in accordance with City of Medina Standards.
Contact Steve Scherer, City of Medina Public Works Department, at 763.473.8842 for Wet Tap inspection.
Maintain 7.5 Feet of cover on water.
Deflect water to maintain 18-inch minimum outside separation at sewer crossings. Center pipe lengths to provide greatest separation
between joints.
Contact Steve Scherer, City of Medina Public Works Department, at 763.473.8842 for flushing and pressure test inspections.
All joints and connections in the storm sewer system shall be gastight or water tight. Approved resilient rubber joints must be used to
make watertight connections to manholes, catch basins, and other structures.
Catch basins in curb and gutter are sumped 2 inches below the gutter grade. Refer to Detail STR-03 & STR-04 on Sheet C7.X.
Irrigation sleeve to be 4" Schedule 80 PVC buried 24" below grade. Extend sleeves 3' beyond the edge of pavement. Mark each
end of sleeve with 3/4" rebar 12" below finish grade. (coordinate with irrigation contractor.)
Compact cohesive soils in paved areas to 95% of maximum dry density, Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) except the top 3 feet which
shall be compacted to 100%. compact to 98% density where fill depth exceeds 10 feet. The soils shall be within 3% of optimum
moisture content. In granular soils all portions of the embankment shall be compacted to not less than 95% of Modified Proctor
Density (ASTM D1557).
Adjust structures to final grade where disturbed. Comply with requirements of Utility. Meet requirements for traffic loading in paved
areas.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
GENERAL NOTES
UTILITY NOTES
For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1.
NORTH
0 50
15
16
17
18
29
30 31
32
0+
0
0
1+0
0
2+
0
0
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
BLK 2
7
6
5
3
4
2
1
8
9
432
3
1
2 1
4
2
3
BLK 6
BLK
4
BLK 5
1
1
2
3
45
6
7
8 9
10
10
5
BLK 1
4
19 20 21 22 23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
CHIPPEWA ROAD
MO
H
A
W
K
D
R
I
V
E
MO
H
A
W
K
D
R
I
V
E
LA
N
E
33 BLK 8
-0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
15+00
16+00
17+00
18+00
19+00 20+00
21+00
22+
0
0
23
+
0
0
2
4
+
0
0
2
5
+
0
0
2
6
+
0
0
2
7
+
0
0
28
+
0
0
29
+
0
0
30
+
0
0
3
1
+
0
0
3
1
+
4
3
.
7
1
-0+22 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00
5+00
6+
0
0
7+
0
0
7+
0
9
.
4
2
-0+2
8
0+0
0
1+0
0
2+0
0
2+3
7
.
0
2
-0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00
3+00
4+00
5+0
0
6+0
0
7+
0
0
8+
0
0
9+
0
0
10
+
0
0
11
+
0
0
12
+
0
0
13
+
0
0
14
+
0
0
15
+
0
0
15
+
5
0
.
4
8
-0+50 0+00 1+00
2+
0
0
3+
0
0
4+
0
0
5+
0
0
6+
0
0
7+
0
0
7+
5
2
.
2
5
-0+20 0+00
1+00
2+
0
0
3+00
4+00
4+65.18
POND
(9P)
BTM = 976.00
NWL = 985.00
HWL = 987.11
FILTRATION
BASIN (16P)
BTM = 984.50
HWL = 987.61
POND
(18P)
BTM = 978.00
NWL = 986.00
HWL = 987.42
POND
(20P)
BTM = 975.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 986.33
POND
(14P)
BTM = 980.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 988.42
POND
(12P)
BTM = 973.50
NWL = 982.50
HWL = 984.98
HILL
S
I
D
E
BR
O
O
K
V
I
E
W
C
O
U
R
T
MEADOWVIEW
OUTLOT C
WET 1h
HWL = 983.89
WET 4
HWL = 985.01
WET 5b
HWL = 983.38
100-YR B-B = 985.00
W
E
T
5
a
H
W
L
=
9
8
3
.
3
8
1
0
0
-
Y
R
B
-
B
=
9
8
5
.
0
0
WET 1f
HWL =
985.16
POND 3
HWL =
991.07
HWL = 983.88
WET 2
HWL = 986.27
OUTLOT D
COURT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
POND
(13P)
BTM = 979.00
NWL = 984.00
HWL = 988.00
BLK
3
CB RECT
RE=991.1
SSMH
RE=1005.5
IE=974.93
SSMH
RE=996.8
IE=975.43
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
OE
OE
OE
OTV
G
O
T
V
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>>
I I I I
I I I
>
I
>
I
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:992.55
INV:976.35
INV:977.32
17
0
33
33
33
33 33
3333
33
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:995.01
INL: 982.81 (W)
INV: 974.76 (N)(S)
80 LF.
6" PVC
>
>
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:984.80
INV:973.56
EX. 6" DIP
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
EX
.
1
0
"
P
V
C
EX
.
1
0
"
P
V
C
EX
.
1
0
"
P
V
C
EX
.
1
0
"
P
V
C
WL 3
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:985.09
INV:972.26
EX. SAN.MH
RIM:985.81
INL:970.64
INV:969.33
RE=999.94
IE=973.16
SSMH
RE=1001.97
IE=973.78
SSMH
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>
>
>
>
EX. 6" PVC
ST-11EL=997.4
ST-12
EL=990.2
ST-13
EL=991.7
ST-14
EL=988.3
ST-15
EL=989.0
ST-16
EL=990.5
ST-22
EL=985.8
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
12
"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
12" PVC C900
8" SAN
@ 0.40%
INL: 976.45 (E)
12" PVC C900
MH 1
RIM: 990.73
BUILD: 13.4'
INL (E): 977.40
INL (S): 977.40
INV: 977.30
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
STM
ST
M
ST
M
>
>
ST
M
MH 21
RIM: 993.69
BUILD: 14.8'
INL (E): 979.02
INL (S): 979.02
INV: 978.92
MH 22
RIM: 992.80
BUILD: 12.6'
INL (S): 980.25
INV: 980.15
MH 23
RIM: 991.50
BUILD: 10.5'
INL (SW): 981.12
INV: 981.02
MH 24
RIM: 993.61
BUILD: 13.5'
INL (S): 980.16
INV: 983.16
INV: 980.06
MH 25
RIM: 992.40
BUILD: 10.6'
INV: 981.82
MH 33
RIM: 990.14
BUILD: 10.3'
INV: 979.80
MH 32
RIM: 994.31
BUILD: 15.1'
INL (E): 979.27
INL (N): 979.27
INV: 979.17
MH 31
RIM: 990.41
BUILD: 12.6'
INL (N): 977.89
INV: 977.79
MH 34
RIM: 992.55
BUILD: 12.4'
INL (E): 980.23
INV: 980.13
MH 35
RIM: 992.14
BUILD: 10.8'
INL (SE): 981.45
INV: 981.35
MH 36
RIM: 996.51
BUILD: 12.1'
INV: 984.41
MH 38
RIM: 994.60
BUILD: 10.5'
INV: 984.05
MH 37
RIM: 993.52
BUILD: 10.5'
INL (NW): 983.12
INV: 983.02
MH 29
RIM: 991.94
BUILD: 15.9'
INL (NE): 976.13
INV: 976.03
MH 28
RIM: 989.58
BUILD: 14.8'
INL (NE): 974.89
INV: 974.79
MH 27
RIM: 988.21
BUILD: 14.0'
INL (E): 974.35
INV: 974.25
MH 26
RIM: 984.34
BUILD: 11.2'
INL (E): 973.10
>
>
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8" PVC C900
8" PVC C900
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8" P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8" P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8" PVC
C
9
0
0
8" PVC C900
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8"
S
A
N
@
0
.
4
0
%
8" SAN
@ 0.40%8" SAN
@ 0.40%
8"
S
A
N
@ 1
.
3
0
%
8"
S
A
N
@
0
.
4
0
%
8"
S
A
N
@ 0
.
4
0
%
8"
S
A
N
@
0
.
9
5
%
8" S
A
N
@ 0
.
4
0
%
8"
S
A
N
@ 0
.
4
0
%
8" S
A
N
@ 0.
4
0
%
8" SAN
@ 0.40%
8" SAN
@ 0.40%
8"
S
A
N
@
0
.
7
0
%
8" SAN
@ 1.00%
8"
S
A
N
@
0
.
9
0
%
8" SA
N
@ 1.70
%
8"
S
A
N
@
0
.
7
0
%
8"
S
A
N
@
0
.
7
0
%
8" PVC C900
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8" PV
C
C
9
0
0
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8
"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8" PVC C900
8" P
V
C
C
9
0
0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
STM
STM
STM
>>
>>
>>
OCS 6
RIM (HIGH): 986.50
INL (SE): 982.00
INV: 984.00
BOTTOM: 981.00
OCS 7
RIM (HIGH): 988.50
INL (NW): 984.00
INV: 986.00
BOTTOM: 983.00
FES 6
INV=983.80
FES 7
INV=985.70
12" RCP
@ 1.27%
12" RCP
@ 0.91%
12" RCP
@ 0.58%
FES 5
INV=984.30
OCS 5
RIM (HIGH): 987.00
INL (N): 982.50
INV: 984.50
BOTTOM: 981.50
>
>
FES 8
INV=983.90
OCS 8
RIM (HIGH): 986.50
INL (NW): 982.00
INV: 984.00
BOTTOM: 981.00
15" RCP
@ 0.64%
OCS 9
RIM (HIGH): 987.00
INL (NE): 982.50
INV: 984.50
FES 9
INV=984.10
15" RCP
@ 2.34%
>>
>>
>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
STM
S
T
M
>>
>>
ST
M
>>>>STM
ST
M
CB 903A
RIM: 991.82
INV: 987.77
CBMH 903
RIM: 991.82
INL (W): 987.59
INV: 987.59
CB 902A
RIM: 991.92
INV: 987.62
CBMH 902
RIM: 991.92
INL (W): 987.50
INL (N): 986.90
INV: 986.90
SUMP: 982.65
15" RCP
@ 0.60%
15" RCP
@ 0.60%
15" RCP
@ 0.60%
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
9
0
%
15" RCP
@ 0.50%
FES 900
FES=984.50
FES 1200
INV=984.50
FES 1202A
INV: 988.00
FES 1203A
INV: 988.00
>>>>
CBMH 1203
RIM: 989.00
INL (NW): 985.69
INV: 985.49
STMH 1201
RIM: 989.15
INL (W): 985.44
INL (E): 984.94
INV: 985.44
SUMP: 980.94
CBMH 1202
RIM: 989.34
INL (NE): 985.67
INV: 983.94
15" RCP
@ 7.63%
18" RCP
@ 0.28%
18" RCP
@ -9.95%
CBMH 1301A
RIM: 989.59
INL (N): 985.28
INV: 985.28
SUMP: 982.38
CBMH 1301B
RIM: 991.03
INV: 985.58
SUMP: 981.10
INV: 985.36
SUMP: 981.10
18" RCP
@ 0.50%
CBMH 1305
RIM: 989.75
INL (SE): 985.55
INV: 985.55
SUMP: 981.11
CB 1305A
RIM: 989.75
INV: 985.62
18" RCP
@ 0.25%
CB 1001A
RIM: 990.72
INV: 986.53
CBMH 1001
RIM: 990.72
INL (NW): 986.44
INV: 984.94
FES 1000
INV=984.50
15"
R
C
P
@ 0.
4
0
%
CB 1103
RIM: 993.40
INV: 988.98
FES 1100
INV=986.00
CBMH 1102
RIM: 991.42
INL (W): 986.34
INV: 986.34
CBMH 1101
RIM: 991.42
INL (NW): 986.24
INV: 986.24
SUMP: 982.24
15" RCP
@ 3.00%15" RCP
@ 0.42%
15
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
4
2
%
FES 1500
INV=984.00
CBMH 1501
RIM: 987.58
INL (S): 984.57
INL (E): 984.37
INV: 984.17
SUMP: 982.69
CB 1501A
RIM: 987.58
INV: 984.65
CBMH 1502
RIM: 988.93
INL (NE): 984.92
INV: 984.92
CB 1503A
RIM: 990.95
INV: 987.27
18"
R
C
P
@ 0.
8
0
%
15" RCP
@ 0.32%
21" RCP
@ 0.52%
15" RCP
@ 0.29%
HYD.
HYD.
HYD.
HYD.
HYD.
HYD.
HYD.
HYD.
HYD.
HYD.
FES 800
INV: 887.80
FES 801
INV: 988.00
15' WIDE BOX CULVERT
WITH OPEN BOTTOM
INSIDE TOP ELEV.= 986.00
FOOTING ELEV.=979.00
24" RCP
@ 0.27%
15" RCP
@ 0.34%
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8" P
V
C
C
9
0
0
8"x12" WETTAP
WITH 12" GV
12"x12" WETTAP
WITH VALVE
TIE 10" SAN. SEWER
INTO EXIST. MH
12"x12" WETTAP
WITH VALVE
12"x12" WETTAP
WITH VALVE
BUILD MH OVER EXISTING
10" PVC SAN. SEWER
CB 1503B
RIM: 991.27
INV: 987.23
CBMH 1503
RIM: 991.27
INL (SE): 987.18
INL (NE): 987.18
INV: 986.98
15" RCP
@ 0.82%
ST
M
>>
>>
INV=984.25
INV=984.25
INV=983.77
INV=983.77 2 - 96' - 76"Wx24"H RCP
BOX CULVERTS @ 0.50%
8" SAN
@ 0.40%
8"
S
A
N
@
0
.
4
0
%
OCS 4
RIM: 987.50
INL (SE): 983.00
INV: 985.00
BOTTOM: 982.00
15" RCP
@ 0.27%
FES 4
INV=984.90
18" RC
P
@ 0.59%
CBMH 1301
RIM: 992.29
INL (W): 984.21
INL (E): 984.41
INV: 984.21
SUMP: 981.11
STMH 1302
RIM: 994.64
INL (S): 984.75
INV: 984.55
FES 1300
INV=984.00
CBMH 1303
RIM: 990.69
INL (W): 985.29
INV: 985.29
CBMH 1304
RIM: 990.69
INL (S): 985.36
INV: 985.36
18
"
R
C
P
@ 0
.
2
5
%
18" RCP
@ 0.25%
18" RCP
@ 0.25%
21" RCP
@ 0.21%21
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
5
1
%
>>
>>
>>
ST
M
ST
M
>>
>>
STM >>>>
>>
>>
1
2
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
0
0
%
FES 1600
INV: 982.22
FES 1601
INV: 982.70
12" RCP
@ 0.50%
15" RCP
@ 8.89%
CB 1301C
RIM: 989.59
INL (W): 985.56
18" RCP
@ 0.29%
15" RCP
@ 0.37%>>
>>
>>
15"
R
C
P
@ 1
.
0
0
%
STMH 1801
RIM: 986.69
INL (N): 982.25
INV: 984.25
FES 1800
INV=983.86
FES 1802
INV: 984.20
NORTH
0 100 200
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Randall C. Hedlund
License No:Date:
C401MEH003.dwg
UTILITY PLAN
SOUTH
C4.2
Pipe Materials
Watermain 6" DIP Class 52-Hydrant Leads, 8" PVC C900 & 12" PVC C900 -Main Lines
(ANSI A21.51/AWWA C151)
Water Service 1" Copper Type K (ASTM B88)
Sanitary Sewer 8" PVC SDR 35 (ASTM: D3034, D2665, & F891)
Sanitary Sewer Service 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 (ASTM: D1785, D3034, D2665, & F891)
Storm Sewer RCP 12"-18" CLASS 5 (ASTM C76)
RCP 21" CLASS 4 (ASTM C76)
RCP 24"-48" CLASS 3 (ASTM C76)
Draintile 6" Perforated Draintile 1' Behind Curb with a 6"x4" Tee & 4" PVC To Property Line For Home
Sump Pump Connection
Contact Utility Service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning.
Contractor to field verify location and elevation of all utility points of connection prior to construction of any proposed utilities.
Contractor to notify Engineer immediately if there is any discrepancy.
Contractor to pothole all utility crossings prior to construction of new utilities to verify depths of existing lines. Contact Engineer
immediately if any conflicts are discovered.
Provide means and measures to protect adjacent property from damage during utility installation.
Pipe lengths shown are from center of structure to center of structure or end of end section.
Install tracer wire with all non-conductive utilities in accordance with City of Medina Standards.
Connect to City Utilities in accordance with City of Medina Standards.
Contact Steve Scherer, City of Medina Public Works Department, at 763.473.8842 for Wet Tap inspection.
Maintain 7.5 Feet of cover on water.
Deflect water to maintain 18-inch minimum outside separation at sewer crossings. Center pipe lengths to provide greatest separation
between joints.
Contact Steve Scherer, City of Medina Public Works Department, at 763.473.8842 for flushing and pressure test inspections.
All joints and connections in the storm sewer system shall be gastight or water tight. Approved resilient rubber joints must be used to
make watertight connections to manholes, catch basins, and other structures.
Catch basins in curb and gutter are sumped 2 inches below the gutter grade. Refer to Detail STR-03 & STR-04 on Sheet C7.X.
Irrigation sleeve to be 4" Schedule 80 PVC buried 24" below grade. Extend sleeves 3' beyond the edge of pavement. Mark each
end of sleeve with 3/4" rebar 12" below finish grade. (coordinate with irrigation contractor.)
Compact cohesive soils in paved areas to 95% of maximum dry density, Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) except the top 3 feet which
shall be compacted to 100%. compact to 98% density where fill depth exceeds 10 feet. The soils shall be within 3% of optimum
moisture content. In granular soils all portions of the embankment shall be compacted to not less than 95% of Modified Proctor
Density (ASTM D1557).
Adjust structures to final grade where disturbed. Comply with requirements of Utility. Meet requirements for traffic loading in paved
areas.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
GENERAL NOTES
UTILITY NOTES
For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1.
EM
EM
GAS
>>
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE OE OE OE
>>
>>
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
>>
OTV
OT
V
>>
>>
>>
182
185
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>
EX. 6" DIP
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
980.6
980.
6
980.
6
980.
6
980.
6
980.
6
980
.
6
98
0
.
6
980.6
408409
435437442
454455
456
463
486487
498499
500 501502503
504
505
506
515516517
518 525
531
536
537 538539
544 545
552
576
592593
MB
1
2
3
4
5
6
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
222324
2526
27
28
2930
31
32
33
343536
3738
394041
42
43
44454647
48
495051
52
53
54
55
56
5758
59606162
63
64
71
7374
8990
91
95
9798
99
100
130
131132
133
134
135136
137 138
139
140 141
142
143144
145
146
147148149
150
151152153154155156157
163164165
166 167
168169
170171
172173
183184
186187188
189 190191192193194195 196197 198
199
200
216
217218219
220 221222223 224
225 226
227
228 229230 231
233234235
236
237238239240
241
242
243
244
245246247
248249
250251
252253254255256257
258
259
260
261262
263
264
265
266267
268
269
270
271
272
273274275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282283
284
285
286
287 288
289
290
291
292
293
294295 296297
298
299
300
301302
303
304
305
306
307308
309310
311
312313
314
315
316317
318
319
320321322323
324 325
326
327328329330331332333
334
335336
337338339
340
341342
343
344345
346 347
348349350
351
352353 354
355356
357358
359 360361362
363364365
366367368369
370
371372373374
375
376
377
378379
380381382
383384
385
386
387388
389
390
401 402
403404
405
406
407
410
411412413
414415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423424
425
426
427428429430
431
432
433434
436438439440441
443444
445446447
448
449
450451
452453
457458
459460
461
462
464465
466
467 468
469470
471
472473
474475476
477
478 479
480
481482
483
484485
488489490491492493494495
496497
507508
509510511
512513514
519520521
522
523 524
526 527
528
529
530
532533
534535
540
541
542
543
546
547
548
549
550
551 553
554555 556557
558
559
560561
562
563
564
565566567568569
570 571
572573574
575
577
578
579
580581582583584585586
587588589
590
591
594 595596
597
598599 600
601
602
603604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616617
618
619620
621
622623624625626
627
628
700067000770008
70009
70010
7001170012
70013700147001570016
70017 70018
700197002070028
70029
7003070031
70032
7003370034
70035
70036
700377003870039
70040
7004170042
70043
70044
7004570046
70047 70048
70049
7005070051700527005370054
7005570056
7006170062
7006370064
70065
7006670067700687006970070
70071
70072
70093
7009470095700967009770098
70101 70102
70103
70104
70105701067010770108
70109
7011070111
7011270113
70114
70115
70116
70117
70118
70119
70120
70121701227012370124
70125
70126
70127
7012870129
70130
701317013270133
70136
701377013870139
7014070141
70142
70143
70144
7014570146
70147
70148
70149
70150701517015270153 70154
70155
70156
70157
7015870159
7016070161701627016370164
70165
70166
70167
70172
70182
70183701847018670187
70188
70189
7019070191
7019270193
70194
701957019670197 7019870199
70200 7020170202 70205
70206
7020770208
70209
7021070211
7021270213
7021470215
70216
70217
70218702197022070221
7022270223
70224
7022770228
70229
70230
70232
70233
70234
7023570236
70237 70238
70239
7024070241
7024270243
70244
70245
70246
70265
702667026770268
70269
70271
70272
70273702747027570276
70277
702787027970280702817028270283
702847028570286
7028770288
70289
7029070291
70292702937029470295
7029670297
70298
70299
70300
70301
70302
70303
70304
70305
703067030770308
7030970310
70311
70312
7031370314 70315
703167031770318
70319
70320
70321
70322
70323
7032470325703267032770328
70329
70330
703317033270333
703347033570336
7033770338
7033970340
7034170342
70343
70344
7034570346
70347
703487034970350
70351
7035270353
70354
70355
70358
7036070363
70416
70417
70418
70419
70420704217042270423
7042470425
70426
70427 704287042970430
70431
70433
70434
70435
7043670437
70438
70439
70440
704417044270443
70444
7044570446
70447
70448
7044970450
70451
70452
70453
70454
70456
70457
70458
70534
70538
70542
70543
70544
70545
70546
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811812813814
815
816817
818819
820821
822823824
825826827
828
829
830
831832833
834
835836837838
839
840
841
842
843844845846847
848849850851
852853
854
858
859860
861862863864
871
872
873
874 875
876877878
879
880881882883
884
885
886
887888889
890891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899900
901
902
903 904
905
906907908
909
910911912
913
914915
916
917918
919
920921
922
923
924
925926927928
929
930931
932
933934
935
936937938
939
940941942943
944
945946
947948949 950
951
952953
954955
956
960961
962963
981
1003
1004100510061007
10081009
1010 101110121013
1014
10151016
10171018
1019102010211022
1023
1024
1025
1040
1041
1042
1049
1050
1061
1063
1064
1065
1066
1090
1099
11001101
1102 1103
1104
1105110611071108
11091110
1111 1114
1115111611171118
11221123
1124
1127
1128
1129113011311132
1133
1134
1135
113611371138113911401141
114211431144114511461147
11481149
1150
1151
11521153
115711581159
12031204
1385
ST-1EL=990.6
ST-2EL=990.4
ST-3EL=987.4
ST-4EL=983.8
ST-5EL=982.2
ST-8EL=986.2
ST-9EL=981.2
ST-10
EL=981.7
ST-11
EL=997.4
ST-12
EL=990.2
ST-13
EL=991.7
ST-14
EL=988.3
ST-15
EL=989.0
ST-16
EL=990.5
ST-6EL=984.8
ST-7EL=983.7
ST-17EL=982.1
ST-18EL=982.9
ST-19EL=983.8
ST-20EL=982.6
ST-21EL=982.6
ST-22
EL=985.8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 20
21 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
6364
6566
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
BLOCK 7
42
77
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
BLK 2
7
6
5
3
4
2
1
8
9
432
3
1
2 1
4
2
3
BLK 6
BLK
4
BLK 5
1
1
2
3
45
6
7
8 9
10
10
5
BLK 1
4
19 20 21 22 23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33 BLK 8
BLOCK 7
POND
(23P)
IRRIGATION POND
(1P)
POND
(9P)
POND
(5P)
FILTRATION
BASIN (16P)
POND
(18P)
POND
(20P)
POND
(14P)
POND
(12P)
OUTLOT C
WET 1h
WET 4
WET 5b
W
E
T
5
a
WET 1f
POND 3
WET 1e
WET 2
WET 1d
WET 1c
WET 1a-North
WET 1b1
WET 1b
OUTLOT D
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
POND (1P)
POND
(13P)
BLK
3
STS
>>
STS
>>
S
T
S
>
>
S
T
S
>
>
S
T
S
>
>
ST
S
>>
S
T
S
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
S
T
S
>
>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS
>>
ST
S
>>
STS
>>
STS>>STS>>STS>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS >>STS >>
STS >>STS >>STS >>
S
T
S
>
>
S
T
S
>
>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS >>
STS >>STS >>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS
>>
S
T
S
>
>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS>>STS>>STS>>STS>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS >>STS >>STS >>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
EO
F
EO
F
E
O
F
EO
F
EOF
E
O
F
EO
F
E
O
F
%8.0
%
8.0
E
O
F
6:1Slope
in buffer
6:1
MAX
6:1Slope
in buffer
6
:
1
S
l
o
p
e
6:1
6:1
6
:
1
6
:
1
6:1
14
TYP.
L2.2 LANDSCAPE PLAN
NORTH
L2.3 LANDSCAPE PLAN
SOUTH
CHIPPE
W
A
R
O
A
D
MO
H
A
W
K
R
O
A
D
MO
H
A
W
K
R
O
A
D
2 ABBA
1 PIST
4 THOC
1 LALA
3 PIGL
1 ABBA
1 LALA
1 ABBA
3 PIGL
3 ABBA
2 PIST
3 ABBA
2 PIST
2 LALA
2 PIGL 2 ABBA
4 ABBA
1 LALA
1 LALA
1 PIST
3 THOC
1 PIST
1 ABBA 1 PIST
3 PIGL
3 THOC
1 PIST
1 PIST 1 PIST
1 LALA
1 PIST
3 PIGL 1 ABBA1 ABBA1 PIST
6 PIGL
3 PIGL
1 LALA
2 PIST
3 ABBA
1 LALA
1 LALA
1 PIGL 1 ABBA 2 LALA
2 PIGL
2 PIGL
3 ABBA 3 PIGL
1 ABBA
3 ABBA
2 ABBA
2 PIGL
1 ABBA
3 THOC
7 PIGL
5 THOC
2 ABBA
1 ABBA
2 PIGL
1 ABBA
1 PIST
1 PIST
3 ABBA
3 THOC
3 PIGL
4 THOC
10 PIGL
RE
U
S
E
IR
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
LI
N
E
RE
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME MATURE SIZE PLANTING SIZE ROOT COND.
15 ORNAMENTAL TREE 30`H X 15`W 2"CAL B & B
254 OVERSTORY TREE 60`H X 30`W 2"CAL B & B
EVERGREEN TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME MATURE SIZE PLANTING SIZE ROOT COND.
ABBA 43 ABIES BALSAMEA / BALSAM FIR 60`H X 30`W 6` HT.B & B
LALA 12 LARIX LARICINA / TAMARACK 70`H X 50`W 6` HT.B & B
PIGL 55 PICEA GLAUCA / WHITE SPRUCE 50`H X 20`W 6` HT.B & B
PIST 17 PINUS STROBUS / EASTERN WHITE PINE 70` H X 40` W 6` HT.B & B
THOC 25 THUJA OCCIDENTALIS / AMERICAN ARBORVITAE 40`H X 15`W 6` HT.B & B
REUSE IRRIGATION LINE
NORTH
0 150 300
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
L201MEH003.dwg
LANDSCAPE PLAN
OVERALL
L2.1
Contact Utility Service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning.
Coordinate installation with Contractors performing related work.
Seed mixture (BWSR Mesic Short Urban South and West) as defined by the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources. Native Seeds shall be of Minnesota
origin and certified by the Minnesota Crop Improvement Association (MCIA). Provide verifying documentation to the Owner 30 days minimum prior to
installation.
Plant material shall conform to the American Association of Nurserymen Standards and be of hardy stock, free from disease, infestation, damage, and
disfiguration. For discrepancy between the number of plants on the Schedule and the number shown on the Drawing, the Drawing shall govern.
All existing deciduous/coniferous trees are to be trimmed of dead wood and pruned to a natural uniform shape.
Planting soil shall consist of 4 parts topsoil to 1 part peat humus, with 3 pounds of commercial fertilizer added per cubic yard.
Spread a minimum of 4 inches of topsoil and seed/sod all turf areas disturbed by Construction.
Protective fencing should be installed around all planted trees. See L7.1 sheet for Detail.
See L7.1 Details for depth of planting soil.
Install a 4-foot diameter, 4-inch depth shredded hardwood mulch dish around trees not placed within a Shrub or Perennial Planting Bed. Vinyl edging is not
required, unless noted otherwise.
In-ground irrigation systems may not connect to city water, they must connect to pond or well water.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
GENERAL NOTES
LANDSCAPE NOTES
This Landscape Plan has been developed to meet three landscaping requirements as defined by code: (A) Lot landscaping for R-1,
R-2, R-3 zoning, (B) Buffer Yards, and (C) Tree Replacement.
For construction Staking and Surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.
This page shows the overall plan, tree replacement areas, planting schedule, and allowed tree species. See Sheets L2.2 and L2.3 for
more detailed view of lot landscaping and buffer yard plantings.
1.
2.
3.
Front Yard Trees:
Minimum Size:
Location:
Type:
LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS - LOTS AND BUFFER YARDS
R1 and R2
Yard Trees:
Minimum Size:
Type:
R3 - R5
Two overstory trees per lot
Deciduous trees should be minimum 2 caliper inches measured 4 feet off the ground
Coniferous trees should be minimum 6 feet in height
Fifteen feet from front lot line. Applies to both trees for single family dwellings and one tree for two-family dwellings
Native species are required. A variety of tree species are required, no one species should be more than 25% of the total.
Final selections should comply with the provided list of trees, which also comply with City tree requirements.
One tree per 60 feet of the lot perimeter shall be required. Where a buffer yard is also required, the perimeter may be excluded.
Deciduous trees should be minimum 2 caliper inches measured 4 feet off the ground
Coniferous trees should be minimum 6 feet in height
Native species are required. A variety of tree species are required, no one species should be more than 25% of the total.
Final selections should comply with the provided list of trees, which also comply with City tree requirements.
Ornamental Trees:
Minimum Size:
Type:
One tree per 120 feet of the lot perimeter shall be required. Where a buffer yard is also required, the perimeter may be excluded.
Deciduous trees should be minimum 1.5 caliper inches measured 4 feet off the ground
Coniferous trees should be minimum 6 feet in height
Native species are required. A variety of tree species are required, no one species should be more than 25% of the total.
Final selections should comply with the provided list of trees, which also comply with City tree requirements.
Buffer Yards
A buffer yard is required:
When a developing property is adjacent to or across a street from property of a less intensive zoning district.
Along arterial and collector roadways if the property on the opposite side of the roadway is the same or a more intensive zoning district. See City of Medina
Zoning Ordinance 828.31 for specific tables and calculations.
PLANTING SCHEDULE - LOTS AND BUFFER YARDS
ACCEPTABLE TREE SPECIES SELECTION
Deciduous Trees
Basswood, American (Tilia Americana)
Elm, American (Ulmus americana)*
Hickory, bitternut (Carya cordiformis)
Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana)
Maple, Sugar (Acer saccharum)
Maple, Red (Acer rubrum)
*cultivars resistant to Dutch Elm Disease
Coniferous Trees
Cedar, Northern White (Thuja occidentalis)
Fir, Balsam (Abies balsamea)
Spruce, White (Picea Glauca)
Pine, Eastern White (Pinus Strobus)
Oak, Red (Quercus rubra)
Oak, White (Quercus alba)
Oak, Bur (Quercus macrocarpa)
Oak, Swamp White (Quercus bicolor)
LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS - TREE REPLACEMENT
14.
LEGEND
Irrigation
(A)
(B)
(C)
(C)
(Typ)
(B)
(Typ)
(A)
(Typ)
(C)
(Typ)
(B)
(Typ)
(A)
(Typ)
14.
(Typ)
14.
(Typ)
14.
(Typ)
14.
(Typ)
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the
laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Joshua K. Popehn
License No:Date:
Floodplain Impact
Floodplain Mitigation
Floodplain Impact
and Mitigation
Areas for planting replacement trees
Area Available for Trees:
Estimated Tree Yield for Hatched Area:
Total Replacement Trees Provided:
40'20'
Total significant trees on site:
Allowed Tree Removal (15% of total):
Total Lost :
Trees Lost minus allowed removal:
Total Trees to Replace (number of Trees):
Replacement Requirements:
Total caliper inches to replace (sum of smallest 367 trees):
Tree Loss and Replacement Calculations
Planting Size
(Caliper Inch)
2.5
3
4
Number of Trees
1,380
1,150
862
Remainder Trees to be paid as fee
(based on planting 784 trees on site)
596
366
78
1,718
257
624
367
367
for every 1 caliper inch lost, 1 caliper inch must be planted.
3,448
Number of Replacement Trees Required Based on Planting Size
Estimated Number of Trees to be Planted On Site to Replace Significant Tree Loss
453,227 S.F. (hatched area minus existing trees and bufferyard trees)
363 (assumes trees planted 40 feet on center = 1250 S.F. per tree)
363 Replacement trees
421 Trees for landscaping and buffer yard requirements
784 Total Trees toward replacement
R-1, R-2, and R-3 requirements - tree locations have been provided as a guide for lot builders who are responsible for required
landscaping at the time of home construction. A generic tree symbol is used in these instances. Tree species selection for these must
conform with the provided list. No species should comprise more than 25% of the total planting.
Buffer Yards - tree locations and species have been provided to conform with City calculations and requirements. Any modifications
to this plan must be approved by the City of Medina at the time of building permit.
Tree replacement - areas for tree replacement have been hatched. Replacement trees may be planted in these areas at 40 feet on
center. Where these areas overlap with buffer yards, the buffer yard trees have been subtracted from the tree replacement area. Tree
species selection for these must conform with the provided list. No species should comprise more than 25% of the total planting.
OE OE OE OE
>>
>>
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>I I I I I
I
I I I I
I I
>>
>>
III
182
185
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
980.6
1
2
3
4
5
6
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
2223
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
343536
3738
39
40 41
42
43
4445
46
47
48
49
5051
52
53
54
55
56
5758
596061
62
63
64
71
73
74
130
131132
133
134
135136
137 138
139
140
141
142
143144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152153
154155
156
157
163164 165
166
167
168
169
170171
172173
183184
186187188
189 190
191192 193194195 196197 198
199
200
220
221
222223 224
225
226
227
228 229230 231
233234235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248249
250251
252253
254255
256257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282283
284
285
286
287 288
289
290
291
292
293
294295
296
297
298
299
300
301302
303
304
305
306
307308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
ST-1
EL=990.6
ST-2
EL=990.4
ST-3
EL=987.4
ST-4EL=983.8
ST-5
EL=982.2
ST-8
EL=986.2
ST-9
EL=981.2
ST-10
EL=981.7
ST-6
EL=984.8
ST-7
EL=983.7
ST-17EL=982.1
ST-18
EL=982.9
ST-19
EL=983.8
ST-20
EL=982.6
ST-21
EL=982.6
ST-22
EL=985.8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 20
21 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
6364
6566
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
BLOCK 7
42
77
BLOCK 7
POND
(23P)
IRRIGATION POND
(1P)
POND
(9P)
POND
(5P)
PROPOSED 100-YR
HWL = 979.08
WET 1e
WET 2
WET 1d
WET 1c
WET 1b1
WET 1b
POND (1P)
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
S
T
S
>
>
S
T
S
>
>
S
T
S
>
>
S
T
S
>
>
S
T
S
>
>
STS
>>
STS
>>
S
T
S
>
>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
S
T
M
STM
STM
ST
M
ST
M
S
T
M
S
T
M
STM
>>
>>
ST
S
>>
>>
>>
ST
M
S
T
S
>>
ST
S
>>
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
>>
ST
S
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
STS >>STS >>
>>
>>
>>>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS >>STS >>
>
>
>
>
STS
>>
S
T
S
>
>
S
T
S
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS>>STS>>STS>>STS>>
>>
>
>
>>>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
ST
M
S
T
M
STM
STM
>
>
>
>
>>>>STM
L.P.H.P.
L.P.
H.P.
EX.CL
993.17
%1.0 %1.9 %1.0
%0.5 %0.9
%0.5
2 ABBA
1 PIST
4 THOC
2 LALA4 ABBA
1 LALA
1 LALA
1 PIST
3 THOC
1 PIST
1 ABBA 1 PIST
3 PIGL
3 THOC
1 PIST
1 PIST 1 PIST
1 LALA
1 PIST
3 PIGL 1 ABBA1 ABBA1 PIST
2 PIGL
2 PIGL
3 ABBA 3 PIGL
1 ABBA
3 ABBA
2 ABBA
2 PIGL
1 ABBA
3 THOC
7 PIGL
5 THOC
2 ABBA
1 ABBA
2 PIGL
1 ABBA
1 PIST
1 PIST
3 ABBA
B
C D
B
W
RE
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
RE
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
REUSE IRRIGATION LINE
RE
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
R
E
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
R
E
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
R
E
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
R
E
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
RE
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
IRRIGATION FILTRATION
AND PUMP HOUSE AND
BACKUP WELL
W
RE
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
RE
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
REUSE IRRIGATION LINE
RE
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
R
E
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
R
E
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
R
E
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
R
E
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
RE
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
IRRIGATION FILTRATION
AND PUMP HOUSE AND
BACKUP WELL
TREES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME MATURE SIZE PLANTING SIZE ROOT COND.
152 OVERSTORY TREE 60`H X 30`W 2"CAL B & B
EVERGREEN TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME MATURE SIZE PLANTING SIZE ROOT COND.
ABBA 25 ABIES BALSAMEA / BALSAM FIR 60`H X 30`W 6` HT.B & B
LALA 5 LARIX LARICINA / TAMARACK 70`H X 50`W 6` HT.B & B
PIGL 21 PICEA GLAUCA / WHITE SPRUCE 50`H X 20`W 6` HT.B & B
PIST 10 PINUS STROBUS / EASTERN WHITE PINE 70` H X 40` W 6` HT.B & B
THOC 18 THUJA OCCIDENTALIS / AMERICAN ARBORVITAE 40`H X 15`W 6` HT.B & B
PLANT SCHEDULE NORTH - BUFFER
REUSE IRRIGATION LINEREUSE IRRIGATION LINE
NORTH
0 100 200
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
L202MEH003.dwg
LANDSCAPE PLAN
NORTH
L2.2
Contact Utility Service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning.
Coordinate installation with Contractors performing related work.
Seed mixture (BWSR Mesic Short Urban South and West) as defined by the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources. Native Seeds
shall be of Minnesota origin and certified by the Minnesota Crop Improvement Association (MCIA). Provide verifying documentation
to the Owner 30 days minimum prior to installation.
Plant material shall conform to the American Association of Nurserymen Standards and be of hardy stock, free from disease,
infestation, damage, and disfiguration. For discrepancy between the number of plants on the Schedule and the number shown on the
Drawing, the Drawing shall govern.
All existing deciduous/coniferous trees are to be trimmed of dead wood and pruned to a natural uniform shape.
Planting soil shall consist of 4 parts topsoil to 1 part peat humus, with 3 pounds of commercial fertilizer added per cubic yard.
Spread a minimum of 4 inches of topsoil and seed/sod all turf areas disturbed by Construction.
Protective fencing should be installed around all planted trees. See L7.1 sheet for Detail.
Follow MNDOT Seeding Manual for planting instructions for establishment of native seed and provide coordination for required
erosion prevention and sediment control.
Install a 4-foot diameter shredded hardwood mulch dish around trees not placed within a Shrub or Perennial Planting Bed. Vinyl
edging is not required, unless noted otherwise.
In-ground irrigation systems may not connect to city water, they must connect to pond or well water.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
GENERAL NOTES
LANDSCAPE NOTES
For construction Staking and Surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1.
LANDSCAPE R1 - R3
R2
Total Overstory Trees: 152
Area
A
B
C
Proposed
Developement
R2
R2
R2
R2
Required
Buffer Yard
Opacity
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
Width of
Buffer Yard
20
35
25
35
Minimum Planting
Points per 100
Lineal Feet
320
62
68
140
Length of
Buffer Yard
838'
718'
95'
400'
Total Points
Required
2682
445
65
560
Total Overstory Trees
Provided
(50 planting points
each)
54
9
0
12
Total Medium Deciduous /
Coniferous Trees Provided
(20 planting Points each)
0
0
4
0
A
B
C
LANDSCAPE - BUFFER YARDS
LEGEND
BWSR Mesic Short Urban South and West
45.95 lbs/acre
Adjacent
District
Rural
R3
R3
R1
PLANT SCHEDULE
A
A
D
Irrigation Line
12.
12.
(Typ)
12.
(Typ)
12.
(Typ)
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the
laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Joshua K. Popehn
License No:Date:
MO
H
A
W
K
D
R
I
V
E
CHIPPEWA ROAD
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
OTV
G
O
T
V
EX. 6" DIP
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
EX
.
1
2
"
D
I
P
980.6
980.
6
980.
6
980.
6
980.
6
980.
6
980
.
6
98
0
.
6
980.6
WL 3
408409
435437
442
454455
456
463
486
487
498
499
500 501502503
504
505
506
515516517
518 525
531
536
537 538539
544
545
552
576
592593
401 402
403
404
405
406
407
410
411
412413
414415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427428429430
431
432
433
434
436438
439440
441
443444
445
446447
448
449
450451
452453
457458
459
460
461
462
464465
466
467
468
469470
471
472473
474475476
477
478
479
480
481482
483
484
485
488489
490
491
492
493494
495
496497
507508
509510
511
512513
514
519
520521
522
523
524
526 527
528
529
530
532533
534535
540
541
542
543
546
547
548
549
550
551 553
554555
556
557
558
559
560561
562
563
564
565566
567
568569
570 571
572
573
574
575
577
578
579
580581
582583
584585
586
587
588589
590
591
594
595596
597
598
599 600
601
602
603604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616617
618
619620
621
622623624
625626
627
628
700067000770008
70009
70010
70011 70012
70013 700147001570016
70017 70018
7001970020
70028
70029
7003070031
70032
70033 70034
70035
70036
70037
7003870039
70040
70041
70042
70043
70044
7004570046
70047 70048
70049
7005070051 7005270053
70054
70055
70056
7006170062
7006370064
70065
7006670067
700687006970070
70071
70072
70093
7009470095
70096
7009770098
70101 70102
70103
70104
7010570106
7010770108
70109
7011070111
70112
70113
70114
70115
70116
70117
70118
70119
70120
70121701227012370124
70125
70126
70127
7012870129
70130
7013170132
70133
70136
701377013870139
70140
70141
70142
70143
70144
70145 70146
70147
70148
70149
701507015170152
70153 70154
70155
70156
70157
70158
70159
7016070161
701627016370164
70165
70166
70167
70172
70182
7018370184
7018670187
70188
70189
70190
70191
7019270193
70194
70195
70196
70197 70198
70199
70200
70201
70202 70205
70206
7020770208
70209
7021070211
70212
70213
70214 70215
70216
70217
702187021970220
70221
7022270223
70224
7022770228
70229
70230
70232
70233
70234
7023570236
70237 70238
70239
7024070241
70242
70243
70244
70245
70246
70265
70266
7026770268
70269
70271
70272
70273
7027470275
70276
70277
702787027970280
702817028270283
7028470285
70286
70287 70288
70289
7029070291
7029270293
70294
70295
7029670297
70298
70299
70300
70301
70302
70303
70304
70305
70306 70307 70308
70309 70310
70311
70312
7031370314 70315
7031670317 70318
70319
70320
70321
70322
70323
70324
70325703267032770328
70329
70330
7033170332
70333
703347033570336
7033770338
7033970340
7034170342
70343
70344
7034570346
70347
7034870349
70350
70351
7035270353
70354
70355
70358
70360
70363
70416
70417
70418
70419
70420704217042270423
70424
70425
70426
70427 70428 7042970430
70431
70433
70434
70435
7043670437
70438
70439
70440
704417044270443
70444
7044570446
70447
70448
7044970450
70451
70452
70453
70454
70456
70457
70458
70534
70538
70542
70543
70544
70545
70546
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811812813814
815
816817
818819
820821
822823
824
825826827
828
829
830
831832833
834
835
836837838
839
840
841
842
843844845
846847
848849
850
851
852853
854
858
859860
861
862
863864
871
872
873
874 875
876877878
879
880881882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903 904
905
906907908
909
910
911912
913
914915
916
917
918
919
920921
922
923
924
925926927928
929
930
931
932
933934
935
936937938
939
940941942943
944
945946
947948949
950
951
952
953
954955
956
960
961
962963
981
1003
1004100510061007
10081009
1010 1011 10121013
1014
1015
1016
10171018
10191020
1021 1022
1023
1024
1025
1040
1041
1042
1049
1050
1061
1063
1064
1065
1066
1090
1099
1100
1101
1102 1103
1104
11051106
11071108
1109 1110
1111 1114
1115111611171118
1122
1123
1124
1127
1128
1129113011311132
1133
1134
1135
11361137
113811391140
1141
114211431144114511461147
1148 1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
115711581159
1181118211831184
1185
1186
12031204
1385
ST-11
EL=997.4
ST-12EL=990.2
ST-13
EL=991.7
ST-14
EL=988.3
ST-15
EL=989.0
ST-16
EL=990.5
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
BLK 2
7
6
5
3
4
2
1
8
9
432
3
1
2 1
4
2
3
BLK 6
BLK
4
BLK 5
1
1
2
3
45
6
7
8 9
10
10
5
BLK 1
4
19 20 21 22 23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33 BLK 8
FILTRATION
BASIN (16P)
POND
(18P)
POND
(20P)
POND
(14P)
PROPOSED 100-YR
HWL = 981.83
OUTLOT C
WET 1h
WET 4
WET 5b
W
E
T
5
a
WET 1f
POND 3
OUTLOT D
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
POND
(13P)
BLK
3
STS
>>
STS
>>
ST
S
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
ST
S
>>
STS
>>
STS
>>
STS>>STS>>STS>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS >>STS >>STS >>
S
T
S
>
>
S
T
S
>
>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS >>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
ST
S
>>
STS >>STS >>STS >>
ST
S
>>
2.0%
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
2.0%
2.0%
>
>
>
>
>
>
4 THOC
1 LALA
3 PIGL
1 ABBA
1 LALA
1 ABBA
3 PIGL
3 ABBA
2 PIST
3 ABBA
2 PIST
2 PIGL 2 ABBA
3 PIGL 1 ABBA1 ABBA1 PIST
6 PIGL
3 PIGL
1 LALA
2 PIST
3 ABBA
1 LALA
1 LALA
1 PIGL 1 ABBA 2 LALA
3 THOC
3 PIGL
4 THOC
10 PIGL
W
RE
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
RE
U
S
E
IR
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
LI
N
E
RE
U
S
E
IR
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
LIN
E
REU
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
RE
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
RE
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
RE
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
RE
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
REUSE IRRIGATION LINE
RE
U
S
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
IRRIGATION FILTRATION AND
PUMP HOUSE AND BACKUP WELL
TREES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME MATURE SIZE PLANTING SIZE ROOT COND.
15 ORNAMENTAL TREE 30`H X 15`W 2"CAL B & B
102 OVERSTORY TREE 60`H X 30`W 2"CAL B & B
EVERGREEN TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME MATURE SIZE PLANTING SIZE ROOT COND.
ABBA 18 ABIES BALSAMEA / BALSAM FIR 60`H X 30`W 6` HT.B & B
LALA 7 LARIX LARICINA / TAMARACK 70`H X 50`W 6` HT.B & B
PIGL 34 PICEA GLAUCA / WHITE SPRUCE 50`H X 20`W 6` HT.B & B
PIST 7 PINUS STROBUS / EASTERN WHITE PINE 70` H X 40` W 6` HT.B & B
THOC 7 THUJA OCCIDENTALIS / AMERICAN ARBORVITAE 40`H X 15`W 6` HT.B & B
PLANT SCHEDULE SOUTH-BUFFER
REUSE IRRIGATION LINE
NORTH
0 100 200
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS
RCH
RCH
RCH
RCH
28 SEPT 2020
27 OCT 2020
11 NOV 2020
03 DEC 2020
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
LA
N
D
F
O
R
M
c
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT
VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED
READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT
THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
PROJECT
CERTIFICATION
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Tel: 612-252-9070
Fax: 612-252-9077
Web: landform.net
Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY
ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY
DEVELOPER
MUNICIPALITY
WESTON WOODS
OF MEDINA
MEDINA, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
12.03.2020
MEH17003
20
2
0
MARK SMITH
2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110
TEL (612) 490-0558
L203MEH003.dwg
LANDSCAPE PLAN
SOUTH
L2.3
Contact Utility Service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning.
Coordinate installation with Contractors performing related work.
Seed mixture (BWSR Mesic Short Urban South and West) as defined by the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources. Native Seeds
shall be of Minnesota origin and certified by the Minnesota Crop Improvement Association (MCIA). Provide verifying documentation
to the Owner 30 days minimum prior to installation.
Plant material shall conform to the American Association of Nurserymen Standards and be of hardy stock, free from disease,
infestation, damage, and disfiguration. For discrepancy between the number of plants on the Schedule and the number shown on the
Drawing, the Drawing shall govern.
All existing deciduous/coniferous trees are to be trimmed of dead wood and pruned to a natural uniform shape.
Planting soil shall consist of 4 parts topsoil to 1 part peat humus, with 3 pounds of commercial fertilizer added per cubic yard.
Spread a minimum of 4 inches of topsoil and seed/sod all turf areas disturbed by Construction.
Protective fencing should be installed around all planted trees. See L7.1 sheet for Detail.
Follow MNDOT Seeding Manual for planting instructions for establishment of native seed and provide coordination for required
erosion prevention and sediment control.
Install a 4-foot diameter shredded hardwood mulch dish around trees not placed within a Shrub or Perennial Planting Bed. Vinyl
edging is not required, unless noted otherwise.
In-ground irrigation systems may not connect to city water, they must connect to pond or well water.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
GENERAL NOTES
LANDSCAPE NOTES
For construction Staking and Surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1.
LANDSCAPE R1 - R3
R1
R3 - R5
Total Overstory Trees: 84
Total Ornamental Trees: 15
Total Overstory trees: 18
A buffer yard is required on all sides of the R-3 District and therefore exempt from general landscape requirements.
LANDSCAPE - BUFFER YARDS
Area
E
F
G
H
Proposed
Developement
R3
R3
R1
R1
R1
Required
Buffer Yard
Opacity
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.1
Width of
Buffer Yard
25
20
30
20
20
Minimum Planting
Points per 100
Lineal Feet
68
173
252
320
73
Length of
Buffer Yard
457'
223'
431'
432'
546'
Total Points
Required
311
385
1086
1382
399
Total Overstory
Trees Provided
(50 planting points
each)
7
8
22
28
8
Total Medium Deciduous /
Coniferous Trees Provided
(20 planting Points each)
0
0
0
0
0
E
F
G
H
LEGEND
Adjacent
District
Comm
R2
R3
R3
R2
BWSR Mesic Short Urban South and West
45.95 lbs/acre
PLANT SCHEDULE
E
E
H
G
G
F
II
Irrigation Line
12.
12.
(Typ)
12.
(Typ)
12.
(Typ)
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the
laws of the state of MINNESOTA.
Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of
this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is
available upon request.
Joshua K. Popehn
License No:Date:
H
I
HIG
H
W
A
Y
5
5
MO
H
A
W
K
D
R
I
V
E
BRO
O
K
V
I
E
W
C
O
U
R
T
HIL
L
S
I
D
E
L
A
N
E
MEADOWVIEW COURT
CHIPPEWA ROAD
HIGHWAY 55
")55
")24
")19
")101
")116
")11
")24
")19
£¤12
H A M E L R D
M E D I N A R D
PIONEER TRL
TAMARACK DR
WILLOW DR
HACKAMORE RD
ARROWHEAD DR
H
O
M
E
S
T
E
A
D
T
R
L
CHIPPEWA RD
HUNTER DR
PARKVIEW DR
BROCKTON LN N
MEANDER RD
EVERGREEN RD
BROCKTON LN N
CHIPPEWA RD
WILLOW DR
WILLOW DR
HUNTER DR
")55
Medina Golf &
Country Club
YMCA -
Camp Ihduhapi
Spring Hill
Golf Club
Baker Park Reserve
Baker Park Reserve
Wolsfeld Woods (SNA)
Lake Independence Regional Trail
North-South 1 Regional Trail Search Corridor
L a k e S a r a h R e g i o n a l T r a i l S e a r c h C o r r i d o r
Lake Sarah Regional Trail Search Corridor
Katrina
Independence
School
Mooney
Spurzem
Holy Name
Peter
Wolsfeld
Half Moon
Krieg
Miller
Thies
Ardmore
Map Date: October 2, 2018
Scale: 1:32,000[0 0.5 10.25
Mile
Map 6-1Park and Trail Plan
Location of proposed trail segments
are intended to identify connections
and cooridors, not exact locations.
Legend
Trails
Existing Paved Trail
Existing Shoulder Trail
Existing Turf Trail
Existing Sidewalk
Proposed Paved Trail
Proposed Shoulder Trail
Proposed Turf Trail
Future Park Search Area
Parks
Existing Park
Potential Park Expansion
Regional Corridors
Regional Trail Search Corridor
Tobacco Ordinance Amendment Page 1 of 2 December 15, 2020
City Council Meeting
691587.v1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable mayor and members of the city council
FROM: David Anderson, assistant city attorney
DATE: December 10, 2020
MEETING: December 15, 2020 regular city council
SUBJ: Tobacco ordinance amendment
Background
The city regulates the sale, possession, and use of tobacco and related products in section 615 of
the city’s code of ordinances. Current regulations include a city-administered licensing program
for tobacco retailers along with additional provisions aimed at preventing young people from
accessing, possessing, and using tobacco within the city.
With input from staff, an ordinance has been prepared which would amend the city’s tobacco
regulations. The primary goal of the amendment is to make the city’s regulations consistent with
recently enacted state and federal legislation which now prohibits the sale of tobacco and related
products to persons under the age of 21. The proposed ordinance does the following:
• Updates the city’s tobacco-related definitions in subsection 615.03 so that they are
consistent with statutory definitions;
• Revises the age associated with prohibitions on tobacco sales from 18 to 21;
• Modifies the city’s compliance check program to require the use of persons between the
ages of 17 and 20 years, which is now mandated under state law;
• Amends the city’s administrative penalties for tobacco violations in a manner consistent
with the penalties specified under state law; and
• Cleans up the ordinance to remove or amend language that was either unnecessary or
redundant.
Please know that the proposed ordinance does not amend the city’s current regulations regarding
underage possession, use, and procurement (“PUP”) of tobacco, tobacco-related products, or
electronic delivery devices. Such regulations are currently contained in section 615.19,
subdivisions 2-4. The city currently prohibits persons under 18 years of age from possessing, using,
and procuring tobacco, tobacco-related products, and nicotine delivery devices. Given the recent
legislative changes prohibiting sales to persons under 21, the council might also desire to increase
the age for PUP-related offenses to 21.
There are no state or federal laws imposing PUP regulations on any age group, meaning that cities
are free to adopt their own PUP-related provisions. Thus, increasing the age for such offenses is
Agenda Item # 8B
Tobacco Ordinance Amendment Page 2 of 2 December 15, 2020
City Council Meeting
691587.v1
certainly not mandatory but is a policy question for the council to consider with any input it might
wish to solicit from staff, e.g. the chief of police or others with relevant experience.
The three practical options for addressing PUP regulations within the proposed ordinance are (i)
leave the ordinance as-is; (ii) increase the age for PUP-related offenses by making it unlawful for
anyone under 21 to possess, use, or procure tobacco and related products; or (iii) eliminate PUP-
related offenses altogether and only focus city regulation on the behavior of retailers.
Notice to Licensees
On November 13, 2020, city staff mailed notice to current tobacco licensees indicating that the
city council will consider revisions to its tobacco ordinance during its December 15, 2020 meeting.
Minnesota Statutes, section 461.19 requires 30 days’ mailed notice to licensees when the city will
consider “substantial amendments” to its tobacco ordinance. In this case, although the proposed
ordinance likely does not rise to the level of a “substantial amendment” since the intent is to merely
bring the code into consistency with recently adopted legislation, notices were nevertheless sent
to accommodate any argument to the contrary and to provide licensees with transparency. That
said, even if the proposed ordinance was considered a substantial amendment, there is no
requirement for a formal public hearing under the statute, meaning that while the council may
solicit and hear input regarding the proposed ordinance from anyone that might appear at the
meeting, it is not obligated to do so
Potential Action
After the council completes its review and discussion of the proposed ordinance, it may consider
the following actions:
1. Move to adopt the ordinance amending chapter 6 of the city code of ordinances regarding
tobacco, tobacco-related products, and electronic delivery devices [as presented] OR
[with the following change(s)…]; and
2. Move to adopt the resolution authorizing publication by title and summary [as presented]
OR [with revisions necessary to incorporate and summarize those changes directed by the
council].
Attachments
1. Draft tobacco ordinance
2. Resolution authorizing publication by title and summary
690409.v1 1
CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO. ______
An Ordinance Amending Chapter 6 of the City Code of Ordinances
Regarding Tobacco, Tobacco-Related Devices, and Electronic Delivery Devices
The city council of the city of Medina ordains as follows:
SECTION I: Medina city code section 615 is amended by adding the double underlined
material and deleting the stricken material as follows:
CHAPTER 6
BUSINESS REGULATIONS AND LICENSES
615. TOBACCO, TOBACCO-RELATED DEVICES AND NICOTINE DELIVERY
PRODUCTS ELECTRONIC DELIVERY DEVICES.
Section 615.01. Purpose. The city recognizes that many minors underage persons purchase or
otherwise obtain, possess, and use tobacco, tobacco-related devices, or nicotine delivery products
electronic delivery devices, and such sales, possession, and use are violations of both state and
federal laws. Studies have shown that most smokers begin smoking before they have reached the
age of 18 years and that those persons who reach the age of 18 years without having started
smoking are significantly less likely to begin smoking. Smoking has been shown to be the cause
of several serious health problems which subsequently place a financial burden on all levels of
government. This ordinance is intended to regulate the sale, possession and use of tobacco,
tobacco-related devices, and nicotine delivery products electronic delivery devices for the purpose
of enforcing and furthering existing laws, to protect minors underage persons against the serious
effects associated with the use of tobacco, tobacco-related devices, and nicotine delivery products
electronic delivery devices and to further the official public policy of Minnesota in regard to
preventing young people from starting to smoke, as stated in Minnesota Statutes, section 144.391.
Section 615.03. Definitions and Interpretations. Except as may otherwise be provided or clearly
implied by context, all terms shall be given their commonly accepted definitions. The following
terms shall have the definitions given to them:
Subd. 1. Tobacco. "Tobacco" means cigarettes and any product containing, made, or
derived from tobacco that is intended for human consumption, whether chewed, smoked,
absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, or any
component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product, including, but not limited to cigars;
cheroots; stogies; perique; granulated; plug cut, crimp cut, ready rubbed, and other smoking
tobacco; snuff; snuff flour; cavendish; plug and twist tobacco; fine cut and other chewing
tobaccos; shorts; refuse scraps, clippings, cuttings and sweepings of tobacco; and other
kinds and forms of tobacco. Tobacco excludes any drugs, devices, or combination
products, as those terms are defined in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, tobacco
690409.v1 2
product that has been approved that are authorized for sale by the United States Food and
Drug Administration for sale as a tobacco cessation product, as a tobacco dependence
product, or for other medical purposes, and is being marketed and sold solely for such an
approved purpose.
Subd. 2. Tobacco-Related Devices. "Tobacco-related devices" means cigarette papers or
pipes for smoking or other devices intentionally designed or intended to be used in a
manner which enables the chewing, sniffing, smoking, or inhalation of aerosol or vapor of
tobacco or tobacco products. Tobacco-related devices include components of tobacco-
related devices which may be marketed or sold separately.
Subd. 3. Self-Service Merchandising. "Self-Service Merchandising" shall mean open
displays of tobacco, tobacco-related devices, or nicotine delivery products electronic
delivery devices in any manner in which any person may have access to the tobacco,
tobacco-related devices or nicotine delivery products electronic delivery devices without
the assistance or intervention of the licensee or the licensee's employee. The assistance or
intervention shall entail the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco-related
devices or nicotine delivery products electronic delivery devices between the customer and
the licensee or employee. Self-service merchandising shall not include vending machines.
Subd. 4. Vending Machine. "Vending Machine" shall mean any mechanical, electric or
electronic, or other type of device which dispenses tobacco, tobacco-related devices or
nicotine delivery products electronic delivery devices upon the insertion of money, tokens
or other form of payment directly into the machine by the person seeking to purchase the
tobacco, tobacco-related device or nicotine delivery product electronic delivery device.
Subd. 5. Individually Packaged. "Individually packaged" shall mean the practice of
selling any tobacco wrapped individually for sale. Individually wrapped tobacco shall
include, but not be limited to, single cigarette packs, single bags or cans of loose tobacco
in any form, and single cans or other packaging of snuff or chewing tobacco. Cartons or
other packaging containing more than a single pack or other container as described in this
subdivision shall not be considered individually packaged.
Subd. 6. Loosies. "Loosies" shall mean a single or individually packaged cigarette.
Subd. 7. Minor. "Minor" shall mean any natural person who has not yet reached the age
of 18 years.
Subd. 8. Retail Establishment. "Retail Establishment" shall mean any place of business
in which tobacco, tobacco-related devices or nicotine delivery products electronic delivery
devices are available for sale to the general public, including but not be limited to, grocery
stores, convenience stores and restaurants.
Subd. 9. Moveable Place of Business. "Moveable Place of Business" shall refer to any
business operated out of a mobile sales kiosk, kiosk, trailer, truck, van, automobile or other
690409.v1 3
vehicle or transportable shelter and not at a fixed address, store front or other permanent
structure authorized for sales transactions.
Subd. 10. Sale. A "sale" shall mean any transfer of goods for money, trade, barter or other
consideration, including giving goods away for free alone or in conjunction with other
goods or products.
Subd. 11. Compliance Checks. "Compliance Checks" shall mean the system used by the
city or any other jurisdiction to investigate and ensure that those licensed to sell tobacco,
tobacco-related devices and nicotine delivery products electronic delivery devices are
complying with the requirements of this ordinance or any state or federal law or regulation.
Compliance checks shall involve the use of minors underage persons as authorized by this
ordinance. Compliance checks shall also mean the use of minors underage persons who
attempt to purchase tobacco, tobacco-related devices, or nicotine delivery products
electronic delivery devices for educational, research and training purposes as authorized
by state or federal law.
Subd. 12. Nicotine Delivery Products. “Nicotine Delivery Products” shall mean any
product containing or delivering nicotine or lobelia intended for human consumption, or
any part of such a product, that is not tobacco or a tobacco-related device as defined by this
section. Nicotine delivery products excludes any product that has been approved by the
United States Food and Drug Administration for sale as a tobacco use cessation product,
harm reduction, or for medical purposes, and is being marketed and sold solely for such an
approved purpose. Electronic Delivery Device. "Electronic Delivery Device" means any
product containing or delivering nicotine, lobelia, or any other substance, whether natural
or synthetic, intended for human consumption through inhalation of aerosol or vapor from
the product. Electronic delivery device includes but is not limited to devices manufactured,
marketed, or sold as electronic cigarettes, electronic cigars, electronic pipe, vape pens,
modes, tank systems, or under any other product name or descriptor. Electronic delivery
device includes any component part of a product, whether or not marketed or sold
separately. Electronic delivery device excludes drugs, devices, or combination products, as
those terms are defined in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, that are authorized
for sale by the United States Food and Drug Administration.
Subd. 13. Underage Person. "Underage Person" shall mean any natural person who has
not yet reached the age of 21 years.
Section 615.05. License. No person shall sell or offer to sell any tobacco, tobacco-related device
or nicotine delivery product electronic delivery device without first having obtained a license to
do so from the city in compliance with this section.
Subd. 1. Application. An application for a license to sell tobacco, tobacco-related devices
or nicotine delivery products electronic delivery devices shall be made on a form provided
by the city. The application shall contain the full name of the applicant, the applicant's
residential and business addresses and telephone numbers, the name of the business for
which the license is sought, and any additional information the city deems necessary. Upon
690409.v1 4
receipt of a completed application, the clerk shall forward the application to the city council
for action at its next regularly scheduled meeting. If the clerk determines that an application
is incomplete, he or she shall return the application to the applicant with notice of the
information necessary to make the application complete.
Subd. 2. Action. The city council may either approve or deny the license, or it may delay
action for such reasonable period of time as may be necessary to complete any investigation
of the application or the applicant. If the city council approves the license, the clerk shall
issue the license to the applicant. If the city council denies the license, notice of the denial
shall be given to the applicant.
Subd. 3. Term. Each license shall be issued for a period of one calendar year. If the
application is made during the license year, a license may be issued for the remainder of
the licensed year on a pro rata basis. Any unexpired fraction of a month shall be counted
as a complete month. Every license shall expire on December 31 of the license year.
Subd. 4. Revocation or Suspension. Any license issued under this ordinance may be
revoked or suspended as provided in sections 615.21 and 615.23 of this ordinance.
Subd. 5. Transfers. All licenses issued under this ordinance shall be valid only on the
premises for which the license was issued and only for the person to whom the license was
issued. No transfer of any license to another location or person shall be valid without the
prior approval of the city council.
Subd. 6. Moveable Place of Business. No license shall be issued to a moveable place of
business. Only fixed location businesses shall be eligible to be licensed under this
ordinance.
Subd. 7. Display. All licenses shall be posted and displayed in plain view of the general
public on the licensed premise.
Subd. 8. Renewals. The renewal of a license issued under this section shall be handled in
the same manner as the original application. The request for a renewal shall be made by
the licensee at least thirty days but no more than sixty days before the expiration of the
current license. The issuance of a license issued under this ordinance shall be considered a
privilege and not an absolute right of the applicant and shall not entitle the licensee to an
automatic renewal of the license.
Subd. 9. Fees. No license shall be issued under this ordinance until the appropriate license
fee has been paid in full. The fee for a license under this chapter shall be set by ordinance
in the city fee schedule, as it may be amended from time to time.
Subd. 10. Notice to Commissioner. The clerk shall, within 30 days of the issuance of a
license, inform the commissioner of revenue of the licensee’s name, address, trade name,
and the effective and expiration dates of the license. The commissioner of revenue must
690409.v1 5
also be informed of a license renewal, transfer, cancellation, suspension, or revocation
during the license period.
Section 615.07. Basis for Denial or Revocation of License. The following shall be grounds for
denying the issuance or renewal of a license under this ordinance; however, except as may
otherwise be provided by law, the existence of any particular ground for denial does not mean that
the city council must deny the license:
Subd. 1. The applicant is a minor;
Subd. 2. The applicant has been convicted within the past five years of any violation of a
federal, state, or local law, ordinance provision or other regulation relating to tobacco,
tobacco-related devices or nicotine delivery products electronic delivery devices;
Subd. 3. The applicant has had a license to sell tobacco, tobacco-related devices or nicotine
delivery products electronic delivery devices revoked within the twelve months preceding
the date of application;
Subd. 4. The applicant fails to provide any information required on the application, or
provides false or misleading information; or
Subd. 5. The applicant is prohibited by federal, state, or other local law, ordinance or other
regulation from holding such a license.
If a license is mistakenly issued or renewed to a person, it may be revoked upon the discovery that
the person was ineligible for the license under this section.
Section 615.09. Prohibited Sales. It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any person to sell or
offer to sell any tobacco, tobacco-related device or nicotine delivery product electronic delivery
device as follows:
Subd. 1. To any minor underage person;
Subd. 2. By means of any type of vending machine, except as may otherwise be provided
in this ordinance;
Subd. 3. By means of self-service merchandising;
Subd. 4. By means of loosies;
Subd. 5. Containing opium, morphine, jimson weed, belladonna, strychnos, cocaine,
marijuana, or other deleterious, hallucinogenic, toxic, or controlled substances except
nicotine and other substances found naturally in tobacco or added as part of an otherwise
lawful manufacturing process; or
690409.v1 6
Subd. 6. By any other means, to any other person, on in any other manner or form
prohibited by federal, state, or other local law, ordinance provision or other regulation.
Section 615.11. Vending Machines. It shall be unlawful for any person licensed under this
ordinance to allow the sale of tobacco, tobacco-related devices or nicotine delivery products
electronic delivery devices by the means of a vending machine unless minors underage persons
are at all times prohibited by law from entering the licensed establishment.
Section 615.13. Self-Service Merchandising. It shall be unlawful for a licensee under this
ordinance to allow the sale of tobacco, tobacco-related devices or nicotine delivery products
electronic delivery devices through self-service merchandising.
Section 615.15. Responsibility. All licensees under this ordinance shall be responsible for the
actions of their employees in regard to the sale of tobacco, tobacco-related devices or nicotine
delivery products electronic delivery devices on the licensed premises. The sale of any such item
by an employee shall be considered a sale by the license holder and shall subject the license holder
to the provisions of sections 615.21 and 615.23 of this ordinance. Nothing in this section shall be
construed as prohibiting the city council from also subjecting the employee to appropriate penalties
under this ordinance, state or federal law, or other applicable law or regulation.
Section 615.17. Compliance Checks and Inspections. All licensed premises shall be open to
inspection by the city police or other authorized city official during regular business hours. From
time to time, but at least once per year, the city shall conduct compliance checks by engaging
minors underage persons over the age of 15 years but less than 18 years to enter the licensed
premise to at least 17 years of age, but under the age of 21, who, with the prior written consent of
a parent or guardian if the person is under the age of 18, attempt to purchase tobacco, tobacco-
related devices or nicotine delivery products electronic delivery devices under the direct
supervision of a law enforcement officer or an employee of the licensing authority. Minors used
for the purpose of compliance checks must have the written consent of their parents or guardians
and shall be supervised by city designated law enforcement officers or other designated city
personnel. Minors Underage persons used for compliance checks shall not be guilty of unlawful
possession of tobacco, tobacco-related devices, or nicotine delivery products electronic delivery
devices when such items are obtained as a part of the compliance check. No minor underage person
engaged in a compliance check shall use or attempt to use false identification to misrepresent the
minor's person’s age. Minors Underage persons engaged in a compliance check shall answer
truthfully all questions about the minor's person’s age asked by the licensee or his or her employee
and shall produce any identification, if any exists, for which he or she is asked. Nothing in this
section shall prohibit compliance checks authorized by state or federal laws for educational,
research, or training purposes, or required for the enforcement of a particular state or federal law.
Section 615.19. Other Illegal Acts. Unless otherwise provided, the following acts shall be a
violation of this ordinance:
Subd. 1. Sales. For any person to sell or otherwise provide any tobacco, tobacco-related
device or nicotine delivery product electronic delivery device to any minor underage
person;
690409.v1 7
Subd. 2. Possession. For any minor to have in his or her possession any tobacco, tobacco-
related device or nicotine delivery product electronic delivery device, excluding any minor
lawfully involved in a compliance check;
Subd. 3. Use. For any minor to smoke, chew, sniff, or otherwise use any tobacco, tobacco-
related device or nicotine delivery product electronic delivery device;
Subd. 4. Procurement. For any minor to purchase or attempt to purchase or otherwise
obtain any tobacco, tobacco-related device or nicotine delivery product electronic delivery
device; for any person to purchase or otherwise obtain any such item on behalf of a minor;
or for any person to coerce or attempt to coerce a minor to purchase or otherwise obtain or
use any tobacco, tobacco-related device or nicotine delivery product electronic delivery
device in a manner contrary to law, excluding any minor lawfully involved in a compliance
check; and
Subd. 5. Use of False Identification. For any minor underage person to attempt to disguise
his or her true age by the use of a false form of identification, whether the identification is
that of another person or one on which the age of the person has been modified or tampered
with to represent an age older than the actual age of the person; and
Subd. 6. Tobacco Sampling. Tobacco sampling within a tobacco products shop as defined
by Minnesota Statute 144.4167, Subd. 4 is specifically prohibited.
Section 615.21. Violations.
Subd. 1. Notice. The city shall issue a notice of violation to any licensee, employee of the
licensee, or individual suspected of violating any provision of this ordinance. The notice
of violation shall be served on the licensee, employee of the licensee, or individual
personally or by mail. The notice shall contain the alleged violation and a statement
concerning the licensee's right to a hearing.
Subd. 2. Hearing. If a licensee, employee of the licensee, or individual accused of
violating this ordinance so requests, a hearing shall be scheduled before a hearing officer
at a time and place which shall be published and provided to the accused violator.
Subd. 3. Hearing Officer. The city council shall serve as the hearing officer in any hearing
requested under this section.
Subd. 4. Decision. Following the hearing, if the city council determines by a
preponderance of the evidence that a violation of this ordinance occurred, that decision,
along with the city council's reasons for finding a violation and the administrative penalty
to be imposed under section 615.23 of this ordinance, shall be recorded in writing, a copy
of which shall be provided to the accused violator. If the city council finds that no violation
occurred or finds grounds for not imposing any administrative penalty, such finding shall
be recorded and a copy provided to the accused violator.
690409.v1 8
Subd. 5. Appeals. Any final decision by the city council under this section may be
appealed to Hennepin County district court.
Subd. 6. Continued Violation. Each violation, and every day in which a violation occurs
or continues, shall constitute a separate offense under this ordinance.
Subd. 7. Criminal Prosecution. Nothing in this ordinance shall prohibit the city from
seeking criminal prosecution for any alleged violation of this ordinance in addition to the
administrative penalties specified herein.
Section 615.23. Administrative Penalties.
Subd. 1. Licensees. Any licensee who sells tobacco, tobacco-related devices or nicotine
delivery products electronic delivery devices to a minor an underage person or whose
employee sells tobacco, tobacco-related devices or nicotine delivery products electronic
delivery devices to a minor an underage person shall be charged an administrative fine of
$500 $300 for a first violation, $750 $600 for a second violation at the same licensed
premises within a 24 36 month period and $1,000 for a third or subsequent violation at the
same licensed premises within a 24 36 month period, subject to the right to a hearing before
the city council as provided in section 615.21 of this ordinance. Any licensee who sells
tobacco, tobacco-related devices or nicotine delivery products electronic delivery devices
to a minor an underage person or whose employee sells tobacco, tobacco-related devices
or nicotine delivery products electronic delivery devices to a minor an underage person
may also have his or her license suspended for up to 10 days for a first violation, up to 20
days for a second violation at the same licensed premises within a 24 36 month period, and
up to 30 days for a third or subsequent violation at the same licensed premises within a 24
36 month period, subject to the right to a hearing before the city council as provided in
section 615.21 of this ordinance.
Subd. 2. Employees of Licensees. Any employee of a licensee who sells tobacco, tobacco-
related devices or nicotine delivery products electronic delivery devices to a minor an
underage person shall be charged an administrative fine of up to $100 for a first violation,
up to $300 for a second violation within a 24 month period and up to $500 for a third or
subsequent violation within a 24 month period $50, subject to the right to a hearing before
the city council as provided in section 615.21 of this ordinance.
Subd. 3. Minors. Minors found in unlawful possession of, or who unlawfully purchase or
attempt to purchase, tobacco, tobacco-related devices or nicotine delivery products
electronic delivery devices, shall be required to attend an appropriate education session
concerning their violation and be required to serve up to 100 hours of community service,
as determined by the chief of police. Any minor aggrieved by a decision of the chief of
police in such instance may appeal the decision to the city council by providing written
notice to the clerk within 10 days of the date of receipt of written notice of the decision by
the chief of police.
690409.v1 9
Subd. 4. Other Individuals. Any individual other than a licensee or employee of a licensee
who sells tobacco, tobacco-related devices or nicotine delivery products electronic delivery
devices to a minor an underage person shall be charged an administrative fee of up to $100
for a first violation, up to $300 for a second violation within a 24-month period and up to
$500 for a third or subsequent violation with a 24 month period $50, subject to the right to
a hearing before the city council as provided in section 615.21 of this ordinance. Nothing
in this section shall prohibit the city or other jurisdiction from seeking criminal prosecution
for any alleged violation of this ordinance by any individual other than a licensee or
employee of a licensee. If the city or other jurisdiction seeks criminal prosecution under
this subdivision, no administrative penalty shall be imposed.
Section 615.25. Exceptions and Defenses. Nothing in this ordinance shall prevent the providing
of tobacco, tobacco-related devices or nicotine delivery products electronic delivery devices to a
minor an underage person as part of a lawfully recognized religious, spiritual, or cultural
ceremony. It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge of violating this ordinance for a person to
have reasonably relied on proof of age as described by Minnesota Statute 340A.503, subd. 6.
Section 615.27. Severability and Savings Clause. If any section or portion of this ordinance shall
be found unconstitutional or otherwise invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent
jurisdiction, that finding shall not serve as an invalidation or effect the validity and enforceability
of any other section or provision of this ordinance.
SECTION II. The ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption and publication.
Adopted by the city council of the city of Medina this _____ day of ________, 2020.
____________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
Published in the Crow River News on the ___ day of _________, 2020.
Resolution No. 2020-
December 15, 2020
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption.
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. ________
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF
ORDINANCE NO. ____ BY TITLE AND SUMMARY
WHEREAS, the city council of the city of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. _____, an
ordinance amending chapter 6 of the city code of ordinances regarding tobacco, tobacco-related
devices, and electronic delivery devices; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, section 412.191, subd. 4, allows for publication by title and
summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and
WHEREAS, the ordinance is nine pages in length; and
WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the
public of the intent and effect of the ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that
the city clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. _____ to be published in the
official newspaper in lieu of the entire ordinance:
Public Notice
The city council of the city of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. _____, an ordinance
amending chapter 6 of the city code of ordinances regarding tobacco, tobacco-related devices, and
electronic delivery devices. The purpose of the ordinance is to modify the City’s tobacco regulations
to conform to recently enacted state and federal legislation, which prohibits the sale of tobacco
products to individuals under the age of 21. The ordinance replaces all previous tobacco sales
regulations relating to individuals under the age of 18 with same or similar regulations relating to
individuals under the age of 21. The ordinance also establishes updated definitions of the terms
“tobacco,” “tobacco-related devices,” and “electronic delivery devices” that are consistent with state
statute, modifies the City’s compliance check program to include persons between the ages of 17 and
20 years, and amends the City’s administrative penalties for tobacco licensees and other individuals
in a manner that is otherwise consistent with state law. The full text of Ordinance No. ____ is available
Resolution No. 2020- 2
December 15, 2020
for inspection at Medina city hall during regular business hours. A copy is also available online at the
City’s website located at www.medinamn.us.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that the city clerk
keep a copy of the ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that he post a full copy
of the ordinance in a public place within the city.
Dated: December 15, 2020.
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
_________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Ordinance Amendment Page 1 of 5 December 15, 2020
Min. Area per Dwelling City Council Meeting
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director; through City Administrator Scott Johnson
DATE: December 10, 2020
MEETING: December 15, 2020 Planning Commission
SUBJ: Ordinance Amendment – Min Area per dwelling
Background
Regulations of various multi-family zoning districts generally allow development at the lower
end of the allowed density range as a default, and allow additional density if applicants
incorporate additional design elements into a project. Examples of elements which can provide
bonus density include:
• Affordable housing
• Recreational amenities, open space preservation
• Exceeding environmental protections
• Exceeding minimum architectural or landscaping requirements
• Underground parking
• Amenities within the units (fireplaces, etc.)
Current regulations also provide additional density if an applicant exceeds minimum sound
suppression requirements between units.
Earlier this fall, the City received correspondence from the Minnesota Department of Labor and
Industry (DOLI) that the agency believed the City’s zoning ordinance providing additional
density for enhanced sound suppression was inconsistent with the building code. A community
is not allowed to adopt building code standards which are inconsistent with the state building
code.
The City attempted to discuss the issue with DOLI, expressing our position that the provision is
an optional incentive rather than a building code requirement, and that it was a zoning regulation
pertaining to density/lot size which is permitted by law.
DOLI disagreed with the City’s interpretation and threatened to take legal action. The City
Council, while continuing to disagree with DOLI’s position and finding it unfortunate to do so,
directed staff to initiate an amendment to consider removing the provision.
The attached ordinance would remove the provision. While the subject is being discussed, staff
thought it would be an opportunity to consider the density regulations more broadly.
Agenda Item # 8C
Ordinance Amendment Page 2 of 5 December 15, 2020
Min. Area per Dwelling City Council Meeting
Description of Density Regulations
Following is a brief description for how the density of development is regulated in the districts.
Each district establishes a minimum and maximum “net lot area per unit.” This can be equated
to a density, but is not as apparent. As a result, staff describes the requirements in terms of
density below.
Each district allows for development at the lower end of the density described in the Comp Plan.
An applicant can choose to incorporate various design elements to receive bonus density. The
districts limit the density to the amount described in the Comp Plan, so even if a project would
implement all the bonuses, it could not exceed the maximum.
R3 – Mid-Density Residential
This district is intended to implement the Medium Density Residential (MDR) land use of the
Comp Plan, which would allow density between the range of 5-7 units per net acre.
The R3 district allows 5.0-5.5 units/acre without bonuses. The following density bonuses are
available in the district, and are described more in-depth on pages 1-2 of the ordinance:
Optional Bonus Lot Area/Unit
Reduction
Density Bonus
Calculated
Affordable Housing 1700 1.50 unit/acre
LEED/Low Impact Development 1220 1.00 unit/acre
Underground Parking 1220 1.00 unit/acre
Oversize garage/storage 350 0.25 unit/acre
Recreation facilities/open space 350 0.25 unit/acre
R4 – Residential Multiple Family
This district is intended to implement the High Density Residential (HDR) land use of the Comp
Plan, which would allow density between the range of 12-15 units per net acre.
The R4 district allows 12.0-12.8 units/acre without bonuses. The following density bonuses are
available in the district, and are described more in-depth on pages 3-4 of the ordinance:
Optional Bonus Lot Area/Unit
Reduction
Density Bonus
Calculated
Affordable Housing 500 2.22 unit/acre
LEED/Low Impact Development 230 0.94 unit/acre
Exceeding Arch/Landscaping 230 0.94 unit/acre
Underground Parking 340 1.44 unit/acre
Oversize garage/storage 110 0.44 unit/acre
Recreation facilities/open space 230 0.94 unit/acre
Unit amenities 110 0.44 unit/acre
Ordinance Amendment Page 3 of 5 December 15, 2020
Min. Area per Dwelling City Council Meeting
MU – Mixed Use
No property within the City is currently zoned MU. The zoning district implemented a land use
which was in place during the 2010-2020 Comp Plan and all property has been rezoned since
adoption of the updated Plan.
Staff has included the removal of the sound suppression allowance in the attached ordinance to
appease DOLI. The district could be deleted from the code in its entirety in the future when the
City conducts a broader clean-up of the zoning code.
MXR – Mixed Residential
This district is intended to implement the Mixed Residential land use of the Comp Plan, which
requires a mix of housing types that result in an overall density within a range of 3.0-3.5 units
per net acre. The land use requires a portion of the units (approximately 1/3) to be higher density
units in excess of 8 units/acre.
To implement the objectives of the Comp Plan, the MXR district allows a portion of the site to
be developed with 8.0-10.0 units/acre without bonuses. The following density bonuses are
available in the district, and are described more in-depth on pages 6-7 of the ordinance:
Optional Bonus Lot Area/Unit
Reduction
Density Bonus
Calculated
Affordable Housing 560 1.49 unit/acre
LEED/Low Impact Development 390 1.00 unit/acre
Exceeding Arch/Landscaping 390 1.00 unit/acre
Underground Parking 560 1.49 unit/acre
Oversize garage/storage 110 0.27 unit/acre
Recreation facilities/open space 390 1.00 unit/acre
Unit amenities 110 0.27 unit/acre
Proposed Amendments
The attached ordinance proposes the following three changes.
Removal of Option for Density Bonus for Enhanced Sound Suppression
The attached ordinance removes the option for property owners to receive additional density if
they choose to exceed minimum sound suppression between units.
Addition of Option in R3 for Bonus Density for Exceeding Architectural/Landscaping
Other multi-family districts provide the option for bonus density for projects which exceed
minimum architectural or landscaping requirements. However, this option is not provided in the
R3 district, so staff recommends that this provision be considered for the R3 district as well.
The attached ordinance would provide up to an additional 0.25 units/acre for projects which
exceed these requirements.
Ordinance Amendment Page 4 of 5 December 15, 2020
Min. Area per Dwelling City Council Meeting
Size of Storage Area to Receive Bonus Density
The City currently requires new townhomes to include a garage with a minimum area of 400
square feet (approximately 19.5’x 21.5’). The multi-family districts provide additional density if
a project includes larger townhome garages or lockable storage areas in the case of apartments.
The districts differ in terms of how much storage space is required to qualify for the bonus. The
bonus is provided if townhome garages are 60 or 100 square feet larger (depending on the
district) or if lockable storage of 25 or 50 square feet is provided in apartments (depending on the
district).
Staff believes that the size requirements in many of these districts are likely too large for the
additional density provided. Staff recommends that the requirements be updated to require a
minimum of 40 square feet in townhome garages (approximately 2 additional feet of depth or
width) and 25 square feet for apartment storage.
Discussion Items
Staff seeks any general feedback that the Planning Commission and Council have on the density
as implemented in the districts. Questions to be considered may be:
1. Are the amounts of bonuses as desired?
2. Are there other design elements which should be considered?
3. Are the density ranges permitted without bonuses as desired?
Flexibility for Density Range
In addition to the general questions above, staff requests feedback on whether the districts should
provide additional density flexibility as described in the Comprehensive Plan.
One of the objectives of the land use chapter allows the City to grant density beyond the range
described for the use in the Comp Plan up to +20% as follows: “consider exceptions to or
modifications of density restrictions for developments that protect the natural features or exceed
other standards of the zoning district. Such modification shall generally not exceed -10% of the
minimum density or +20% of the maximum density requirement of the relevant land use.”
Currently, the R3 zoning district explicitly limits the bonuses to permit no more than 7
units/acre, but the R4 district states “the density after the bonus(es) must be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.”
Staff believes this ambiguity suggests that it could be argued that in the R4 zoning district, the
bonuses could allow for the +20% bonus described in the Comp Plan, while the R3 district
would not.
Staff recommends that this ambiguity be clarified. The Planning Commission and Council can
discuss whether it desires to allow the flexibility in either district. It may be appropriate to allow
for the flexibility in R4 but not R3 since the 12-15 unit/acre range is so narrow from a %
standpoint.
Ordinance Amendment Page 5 of 5 December 15, 2020
Min. Area per Dwelling City Council Meeting
If the flexibility is prohibited explicitly in the districts, it could still be possible for an applicant
to request it through use of a PUD. However, this process introduces more unknowns for an
applicant.
Bonus Density on Smaller Lots
Many of the density bonuses provide bonuses equivalent to fractions of units/acre. In the case of
smaller lots, this means that the bonuses may not even be able to be utilized. For example, a
0.25 unit/acre bonus on an acre lot would not provide a bonus.
Staff recommends discussing whether it would be appropriate to add a provision that each bonus
provide a bonus of at least one unit.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance at the December 8
meeting. No one spoke at the hearing.
An excerpt from the draft minutes is attached, but the discussion from the Commission is
summarized below:
• Commissioners were disappointed in DOLI’s position and urged that the City investigate
avenues to potentially add the option for bonus density for sound suppression back to the
ordinance.
• Commissioners recommended approval of the ordinance making the changes noted above.
• In terms of the broader discussion items:
o The Commission believed the bonuses as amended seemed appropriate
o The Commission supported allowing the +20% density described within the Comp Plan
within the R4 district. Other districts would not allow for it, but a PUD would be an
option
o Commissioners did not see a strong reason to add minimum bonuses for small lots.
Following the discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the attached
ordinance.
Potential Action
When the Council has finalized review of the ordinance, the following actions could be
considered:
1. Move to adopt the ordinance regarding minimum lot area per dwelling in the R3, R4,
MU, and MXR zoning districts.
2. Move to adopt the resolution authorizing publication by title and summary
Attachments
1. Draft Ordinance
2. Resolution to publish by title and summary
3. Excerpt from draft 12/8/2020 Planning Commission hearing
Ordinance No. ### 1
DATE
CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO. ###
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO MINIMUM AREA
PER DWELLING UNIT IN THE R3, R4, MU, AND MXR ZONING DISRICTS;
AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE CITY CODE
The City Council of the City of Medina ordains as follows:
SECTION I. Section 841.1.05 of the code of ordinances of the City of Medina is amended by
deleting the struck through language and adding the underlined language as follows:
Section 841.1.05. (R3) Lot Standards. The following standards shall be observed, subject to
additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in the city code. Many of these
standards may be applied across a coordinated development so that individual lots may not meet
all requirements (lot area and impervious surface coverage, for example) but the development as
a whole is consistent with the standards. In these situations, the city shall require documentation
which describes the property which is subject to the coordinated development.
Subd. 1. Density of Development: Development or redevelopment shall be consistent with
the density requirements of the Comprehensive Plan.
Subd. 2. Minimum Net Area per Unit: 7,920 square feet per unit, except as modified by Subd.
4 below.
Subd. 3. Maximum Net Area per Unit: 8,700 square feet per unit
Subd. 4. Density Bonuses: Certain design and construction features serve to reduce the real
and perceived impacts of crowding prevalent in multiple-residential dwelling units and
building complexes. The Minimum Net Area per Unit requirement above may be reduced
in accordance to the following, except that total reductions shall not exceed 1,700 square
feet of Net Lot Area per unit to ensure the density after the bonus(es) is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
(a) Affordable Housing (max. reduction = 1,700 square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit).
The density bonus shall be based on the proportion of units which will be preserved
as affordable housing and the nature of the restriction utilized to maintain
affordability.
(b) LEED Certification or similar (max. reduction = 1,220 square feet of Net Lot Area per
Unit). The density bonus shall be based upon the level of certification, with the full
bonus available for the highest level of certification.
(c) Low impact development (max. reduction = 1,220 square feet of Net Lot Area per
Unit). The density bonus shall be based on the water quality improvements above
those required by the city.
(d) Underground Parking (max. reduction = 1,220 square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit).
The density bonus shall be based upon the number of parking stalls provided, with
Ordinance No. ### 2
DATE
the full bonus available if at least one underground space is provided per dwelling
unit.
(e) Exceeding building design, landscaping or buffer yard requirements (max. reduction
= 350 square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit)Sound suppression (max. reduction =
660 square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit). In order to be eligible, the STC rating
must be increased by ten from that specified as the minimum in the Minnesota State
Building Code.
(f) Oversized garages or lockable storage units (max. reduction = 350 square feet of Net
Lot Area per Unit). Additional storage must be at least 60 40 square feet for
townhomes or 25 square feet for other uses.
(g) Common open space and shared recreational facilities (max. reduction = 350 square
feet of Net Lot Area per Unit)
Subd. 5. Minimum Setback from Perimeter of Site: 20 feet, except as modified below. This
setback shall apply to structures, parking, and recreational areas.
(a) Increase adjacent to less intensive zoning district. The setback adjacent to or across a
street from property of a less intensive zoning district shall be increased to 40 feet.
(b) Increase for required buffer yard. The required setback shall be increased when
necessary to abide by buffer yard requirements.
Subd. 6. Street Setbacks: The following yard setback shall be required adjacent to public or
private streets. Structures, parking areas, and active recreational areas shall not be located
within this setback area. The required yard setback shall be based on the classification of
the street in the Comprehensive Plan as follows:
(a) Private Street: 25 feet, except as follows:
(i) Parking areas and recreational areas shall be exempt from this requirement.
(ii) Reduction of setback for side- or rear-load garage: The front yard setback may
be reduced to 15 feet if garage doors do not face the street and if garage
walls facing the street include a window or architectural elements to give
the appearance of living space.
(b) Local Roadway: 40 feet
(c) Collector or Arterial Roadway: 50 feet
Subd. 7. Minimum Setbacks between buildings within a development: 30 feet
Subd. 8. Maximum Impervious Surface: 50 percent of the total lot area. Impervious surface
coverage may exceed this amount if stormwater management practices are implemented
which, according to the City Engineer, exceed stormwater retention and treatment
regulations. However, in no case shall impervious surface coverage exceed 65 percent of
the lot area remaining after wetlands and stormwater ponds have been excluded.
Ordinance No. ### 3
DATE
SECTION II. Section 841.2.05 of the code of ordinances of the City of Medina is amended by
deleting the struck through language and adding the underlined language as follows:
Section 841.2.05. (R4) Lot Standards. The following standards shall be observed, subject to
additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in the city code. Many of these
standards may be applied across a coordinated development so that individual lots may not meet
all requirements (lot area and impervious surface coverage, for example) but the development as
a whole is consistent with the standards. In these situations, the city shall require documentation
which describes the property which is subject to the coordinated development.
Subd. 1. Density of Development: Development or redevelopment shall be consistent with
the density requirements of the Comprehensive Plan.
Subd. 2. Minimum Net Lot Area per Unit: 3,400 square feet per unit
Subd. 3. Maximum Net Lot Area per Unit: 3,650 square feet per unit
Subd. 4. Density Bonuses: Certain design and construction features serve to reduce the real
and perceived impacts of crowding prevalent in multiple-residential dwelling units and
building complexes. The Minimum Net Lot Area per Unit requirement above may be
reduced in accordance to the following, except that the density after the bonus(es) must be
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
(a) Affordable Housing (max. reduction = 500 square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit).
The density bonus shall be based on the proportion of units which will be preserved
as affordable housing and the nature of the restriction utilized to maintain
affordability.
(b) LEED Certification or similar (max. reduction = 230 square feet of Net Lot Area per
Unit). The density bonus shall be based upon the level of certification, with the
full bonus available for the highest level of certification.
(c) Low impact development (max. reduction = 230 square feet of Net Lot Area per
Unit). The density bonus shall be based on the water quality improvements above
those required by the city.
(d) Exceeding building design, landscaping or buffer yard requirements (max. reduction
= 230 square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit).
(e) Sound suppression (max. reduction = 230 square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit). In
order to be eligible, the STC rating must be increased by ten from that specified as
the minimum in the Minnesota State Building Code.
(f)(e) Underground Parking (max. reduction = 340 square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit).
The density bonus shall be based upon the number of parking stalls provided, with
the full bonus available if at least one underground space is provided per dwelling
unit.
(g)(f) Oversized garages or lockable storage units (max. reduction = 110 square feet of Net
Lot Area per Unit). Additional storage must be 100 40 square feet for townhomes
or 50 25 square feet or greater for other uses.
(h)(g) Common open space and shared recreational facilities (max. reduction = 230
square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit)
Ordinance No. ### 4
DATE
(i)(h) Dwelling unit amenities (max. reduction = 110 square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit).
Amenities such as additional bathrooms, fireplaces, etc.
Subd. 5. Minimum Setback from Perimeter of Site: 20 feet, except as modified below. This
setback shall apply to structures, parking, and recreational areas.
(a) Increased setback for three-story buildings. The required structure setback shall be
increased to 40 feet if the building exceeds two and one-half stories.
(b) Increased setback adjacent to less intensive zoning district. The setback adjacent to or
across a street from property of a less intensive zoning district shall be increased to
40 feet.
(c) Increased setback for required buffer yard. The required setback shall be increased
when necessary to abide by buffer yard requirements.
Subd. 6. Street Setbacks: The following yard setback shall be required adjacent to public or
private streets. Structures, parking areas, and active recreational areas shall not be located
within this setback area. The required yard setback shall be based on the classification of
the street in the Comprehensive Plan as follows:
(a) Private Street: 25 feet. Parking areas and recreational areas shall be exempt from
this requirement.
(b) Local Roadway: 40 feet
(c) Minor Collector Roadway: 50 feet
(d) Major Collector or Arterial Roadway: 50 feet
Subd. 7. Minimum Setbacks between buildings within a development: 30 feet or the average
height of the two structures, whichever is greater
Subd. 8. Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage: 60 percent of the total lot area. Impervious
surface coverage may exceed this amount if stormwater management practices are
implemented which, according to the City Engineer, exceed stormwater retention and
treatment regulations. However, in no case shall impervious surface coverage exceed 70
percent of the lot area remaining after wetlands and stormwater ponds have been excluded.
SECTION III. Section 842.2.05 of the code of ordinances of the City of Medina is amended by
deleting the struck through language and adding the underlined language as follows:
Section 842.2.05 (MU) Multiple Family Residential Lot Standards. The following standards
shall be observed, subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in the
city code. Many of these standards may be applied across a coordinated development so that
individual lots may not meet all requirements (lot area and impervious surface coverage, for
example) but the development as a whole is consistent with the standards. In these situations, the
city shall require documentation which describes the property which is subject to the coordinated
development.
Subd. 1. Density of Development: Development or redevelopment shall be consistent with
the density requirements of the Comprehensive Plan.
Ordinance No. ### 5
DATE
Subd. 2. Minimum Net Area per Unit: 8,750 square feet per unit
Subd. 3. Maximum Net Area per Unit: 12,500 square feet per unit
Subd. 4. Requirements for Maximum Density: Certain design and construction features serve
to reduce the real and perceived impacts of crowding prevalent in multiple-residential
dwelling units and building complexes or to meet other City objectives. Additional density
of 5 to 7 units per acre shall be allowed provided that the density is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and the overall density average of the subject site does not exceed 7
units per acre.
(a) Affordable Housing (max. bonus = 1.5 unit/acre). The density bonus shall be based on
the proportion of units which will be preserved as affordable housing and the nature
of the restriction utilized to maintain affordability.
(b) LEED Certification or similar (max. bonus = 1.0 unit/acre). The density bonus shall be
based upon the level of certification, with the full bonus available for the highest
level of certification.
(c) Low impact development (max. bonus = 1.0 unit/acre). The density bonus shall be
based on the water quality improvements above those required by the city.
(d) Underground Parking (max. bonus = 1.0 unit/acre). The density bonus shall be based
upon the number of parking stalls provided, with the full bonus available if at least
one underground space is provided per dwelling unit.
(e) Sound suppression (max. bonus = 0.5 unit/acre). In order to be eligible, the STC rating
must be increased by ten from that specified as the minimum in the Minnesota State
Building Code.
(f)(e) Oversized garages or lockable storage units (max. bonus = 0.25 unit/acre).
Additional storage must be at least 100 40 square feet for townhomes or 50 25
square feet for other uses.
(g) (f) Common open space and shared recreational facilities (max. bonus = 0.25 unit/acre).
Subd. 5. Minimum Setback from Perimeter of Site: 20 feet, except as modified below. This
setback shall apply to structures, parking, and recreational areas.
(c) Increase adjacent to less intensive land use. The setback adjacent to or across a street
from property of a less intensive land use shall be increased to 40 feet.
(d) Increase for required buffer yard. The required setback shall be increased when
necessary to abide by buffer yard requirements.
Subd. 6. Street Setbacks: The following yard setback shall be required adjacent to public or
private streets. Structures, parking areas, and active recreational areas shall not be located
within this setback area. The required yard setback shall be based on the classification of
the street in the Comprehensive Plan as follows:
(d) Private Street: 25 feet, except as follows:
(i) Parking areas and recreational areas shall be exempt from this requirement.
(ii) Reduction of setback for side- or rear-load garage: The front yard setback may
be reduced to 15 feet if garage doors do not face the street and if garage
Ordinance No. ### 6
DATE
walls facing the street include a window or architectural elements to give
the appearance of living space.
(e) Local Roadway: 40 feet
(f) Collector or Arterial Roadway: 50 feet
Subd. 7. Minimum Setbacks between buildings within a development: 30 feet
Subd. 8. Maximum Impervious Surface: 50 percent of the total lot area. Impervious surface
coverage may exceed this amount if stormwater management practices are implemented
which, according to the City Engineer, exceed stormwater retention and treatment
regulations. However, in no case shall impervious surface coverage exceed 65 percent of
the lot area remaining after wetlands and stormwater ponds have been excluded.
SECTION IV. Section 843.05 of the code of ordinances of the City of Medina is amended by
deleting the struck through language and adding the underlined language as follows:
Section 843.05. MXR-3 Subdistrict Standards for Townhome, Multiple Family Residential
and other Uses. The following standards shall be observed for townhomes, multiple family
residential uses and other uses, excluding single-family and two-family dwellings. The standards
shall be subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in the City
Code. Many of these standards may be applied across a coordinated development so that
individual lots may not meet all requirements (lot area and impervious surface coverage, for
example) but the development as a whole is consistent with the standards. In these situations, the
City shall require documentation which describes the property which is subject to the
coordinated development.
Subd. 1. Density of Development and Number of Units: Development or redevelopment
shall be consistent with density and number of unit requirements of the Comprehensive
Plan.
Subd. 2. Density Bonuses: Exceptions or modifications to the density requirements may be
considered natural resources are protected or exceed other standards of the zoning
district.
Subd. 3. Minimum Net Area per Dwelling Unit: 4,350 square feet, except as modified by
Subd. 4. below.
Subd. 4. Reduction of Minimum Net Area per Dwelling Unit. Certain design and construction
features serve to reduce the real and perceived impacts of crowding prevalent in multiple-
residential dwelling units and building complexes. The Minimum Net Lot Area per Unit
requirement above may be reduced in accordance to the following, except that the density
after the reduction(s) must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Notwithstanding
the reductions awarded for a development, in no event shall the bonus(es) allow for an
increase in building height, nor a net area per dwelling unit less than 2900 square feet.
Ordinance No. ### 7
DATE
(a) Affordable Housing (max. reduction = 560 square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit).
The density bonus shall be based on the proportion of units which will be preserved
as affordable housing and the nature of the restriction utilized to maintain
affordability.
(b) LEED Certification or similar (max. reduction = 390 square feet of Net Lot Area per
Unit). The density bonus shall be based upon the level of certification, with the
full bonus available for the highest level of certification.
(c) Low impact development (max. reduction 200 square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit).
The density bonus shall be based on the water quality improvements above those
required by the city.
(d) Exceeding building design, landscaping or buffer yard requirements (max. reduction
390 square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit).
(e) Sound suppression (max. reduction = 200 square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit). To
be eligible, the STC rating must be increased by ten from that specified as the
minimum in the Minnesota State Building Code.
(f)(e) Underground Parking (max. reduction 560 square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit). The
density bonus shall be based upon the number of parking stalls provided, with the
full bonus available if at least one underground space is provided per dwelling unit.
(g)(f) Oversized garages or lockable storage units (max. reduction 110 square feet of Net
Lot Area per Unit). Additional storage must be 100 40 square feet for townhomes
or 50 25 square feet or greater for other uses.
(h)(g) Common open space and shared recreational facilities (max. reduction = 390
square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit)
(i)(h) Dwelling unit amenities (max. reduction 110 square feet of Net Lot Area per Unit).
Amenities such as additional bathrooms, fireplaces, etc.
SECTION V. This ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and publication.
Adopted by the Medina city council this ______day of _______________, 2020.
______________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
___________________________________
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
Published in the Crow River News on the _______ day of ______, 2020.
Resolution No. 2020-##
DATE
Member ________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-##
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF
ORDINANCE NO. ### BY TITLE AND SUMMARY
WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an
ordinance pertaining to minimum area per dwelling unit in the R3, R4, MR, and MXR zoning
districts; amending Chapter 8 of the City Code; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statues § 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publications by title and
summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and
WHEREAS, the ordinance is seven pages in length; and
WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform
the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina
that the city clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. ### to be published in the
official newspaper in lieu of the ordinance in its entirety:
Public Notice
The city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ##, an ordinance pertaining to
minimum area per dwelling unit in the R3, R4, MR, and MXR zoning district. The ordinance
adjusts the list of design elements which provide optional bonus density for developments within
these districts.
The full text of the ordinance is available from the city clerk at Medina city hall during regular
business hours.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina that the city
clerk keep a copy of the ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that she post
a full copy of the ordinance in a public place within the city.
Resolution No. 2020-## 2
DATE
Dated: .
______________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ________
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2020 Minutes
1
Public Hearing – Ordinance Amendment – Chapter 8 of the City Code – Pertaining to
Density and Net Area per Dwelling in the Residential-Mid Density (R3), Residential
Multiple Family (R4), Mixed Use (MU, and Mixed Residential (MXR) Zoning Districts
Finke provided background on the density regulations within residential districts, noting that bonuses can
be earned by incorporating optional design elements. He stated that one of those optional provisions was a
provision that incorporated sound suppression that goes above the State standard. He stated that comments
were received from the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry (MDLI) requesting that the City
remove that provision as it was seen to be inconsistent with the State Building Code. He stated that the
position of the City is that it is not a required element, but because legal action has been threatened, staff is
looking to remove that provision from the Code. He stated that staff reviewed the ordinance more broadly
when reviewing this amendment and reviewed the two suggestions. He stated that one of the amendments
would be to incorporate an allowance for additional density to be earned by incorporating additional
architectural and landscaping elements. He stated that one of the provisions allows for additional density
if there are oversized garages or lockable storage units. He noted that the sizing varies throughout the
different residential districts and stated that staff suggested better aligning those sizes and reviewed that
recommendation. He reviewed the items on which he would like input from the Commission including the
allowable density bonus range.
Galzki asked if there has been talk about pursuing this issue further before making the ordinance change.
He recognized the threat of legal action from the MDLI and asked if there has been input from the City
Attorney.
Finke reported that staff engaged in discussions with the MDLI and that group was not open to
compromise. He stated that there was consultation from the City Attorney and while the Council agreed
that method should be encouraged, the issue should not be pursued. He stated that the other reality is that
within a townhome development, that additional sound suppression would most likely be provided through
building practices. He noted that there are other methods which can be utilized to achieve the bonus
density if desired.
Grajczyk asked for clarification on the changes to the storage size.
Finke reviewed the current storage size and the recommendation of staff related to the range for bonus
density.
Grajczyk asked for clarification on the sound suppression and related unit size.
Finke clarified how the sound suppression bonus related to unit size and noted that the provision is
proposed to be removed.
Grajczyk stated that he recognizes the concerns of the City. He asked for more information on the opinion
of MDLI.
Finke stated that MDLI threatened to move forward with legal proceedings against the City.
Grajczyk asked for clarification on the differences between the R3 and R4 districts.
Finke explained the differences between R3 and R4 and the related allowed bonuses.
Grajczyk stated that R3 seems to be more popular. He asked if the R4 developments are more popular in
neighboring communities.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2020 Minutes
2
Finke replied that it would be difficult to compare to neighboring communities because of the available
land designated for the higher densities within Medina. He replied that there is not a significant amount of
medium density development in Medina outside of the townhome development which is under
construction. He stated that there is one 15-acre parcel designated for R4, while the other lots are only a
few acres, therefore there is not a lot of opportunity for R4 development. He stated that there are more
opportunities for mixed use but noted that only a small portion of that development would be likely to
develop at high densities.
Couri asked how often developers invoke this provision in order to achieve bonus density and whether
there would be a significant impact to removing the provision.
Finke replied that there have been two townhome developments within the R3 district that utilized the
sound suppression provision in order to achieve a density bonus.
Couri agreed that it does not seem that it would be worth engaging in litigation and would support
removing the provision.
Popp stated that this amendment would remove the provision related to sound suppression but then
enhance the provision related to the oversized garage/storage units. He asked if the garage/storage bonus
option would be enough to offset the removal of the sound suppression provision. He referenced the
LEAD provision has been utilized by developers to achieve bonus density.
Finke replied that provision has not been utilized as of yet. He stated that the City also has not had an
apartment or multi-family development come through since that provision has been added.
Reid opened the public hearing at 7:34 p.m.
No comments made.
Reid closed the public hearing at 7:34 p.m.
Galzki commented that while he does not agree with removing the sound suppression provision, he also
understands that the City does not want to go forward with legal proceedings. He agreed that the easiest
way to move forward would be to remove that provision related to sound suppression and agreed that it
would make sense to add the provision related to additional architectural design and landscaping. He
stated that he also supports the changes to the provision related to garage/storage units. He stated that he
also agrees with the allowance of up to 20 percent for R4. He stated that he would not support bonus
density for smaller lots and would be fine leaving that language as currently written.
Piper commented that staff has done a tremendous job in this sticky situation. She stated that this
amendment seems well thought out.
Grajczyk echoed the comments of Galzki and agreed that staff did an excellent job addressing this
situation.
Couri agreed with the staff recommendations and comments of Galzki.
Popp stated that he agrees with the comments made related to sound suppression. He agreed that the
increase proposed for the provision related to garage/storage would be appropriate. He commented that
the additional provision related to additional architectural design and landscaping would be a good
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2020 Minutes
3
addition. He commented that the current incentive tiers make sense. He stated that he did not have a
strong feeling towards the allowance up to 20 percent in bonus density and would lean towards leaving it
as stated but could also support the recommendation of staff.
Reid complimented staff for their response to this situation and detail provided in the staff report. She
agreed that it would not be worth pursuing legal action and that the sound suppression provision should be
removed. She stated that she agrees with the recommends made by staff.
Motion by Galzki, seconded by Grajczyk, to recommend approval of the ordinance amendment with
bonus for additional architectural and landscaping in R3 and with allowance for additional 20% in R4.
A roll call vote was performed:
Galzki aye
Piper aye
Grajczyk aye
Couri aye
Popp aye
Reid aye
Motion carries unanimously.
Meadowview Commons Page 1 of 1 December 15, 2020
Storm sewer tax district City Council Meeting
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: December 10, 2020
MEETING: December 15, 2020 City Council
SUBJ: Meadowview Commons – Storm sewer improvement tax district
(Public Hearing)
Background
The City Council granted final plat approval of Meadowview Commons at the November 17
meeting. The City’s practice is to require that homeowners’ associations maintain stormwater
improvements within developments. This is formalized through an agreement that is recorded
against each property. This agreement has been executed by the owner with regard to the
Meadowview Commons development.
Additionally, the City’s practice is to establish Storm Sewer Improvement Taxing District over
development sites as a “back-up plan” if the homeowner’s association does not maintain
stormwater improvements. The City has taken this step in all recent residential subdivisions.
Prior to considering the establishment of such as district, the City Council is required to hold a
Public Hearing. Notice of this public hearing was published for the December 15 meeting.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council first hold the hearing on the Storm Sewer Improvement
Tax District. After the hearing, staff would recommend the following actions:
1) Motion to adopt the ordinance establishing the Meadowview Commons Storm Sewer
Improvement Tax District
2) Motion to adopt the resolution authorizing publication by title and summary
Attachments
1. Ordinance establishing Meadowview Commons Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District
2. Resolution authorizing publication by title and summary
Agenda Item # 8D
Ordinance No. ###
DATE 1
CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO. ###
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE MEADOWVIEW COMMONS
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT TAX DISTRICT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section I. Background: Findings.
1.01. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 444.16 – 444.21 (the “Act”) to
establish a storm sewer improvement tax district within the Meadowview Commons development
(the “District”) to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain and otherwise improve storm
sewer systems and related facilities within the District and to acquire, construct, maintain and improve
stormwater holding areas and ponds outside of the District which are for the benefit of the District in
accordance with the Act and to levy a tax on all taxable property within the District to finance such
activities.
1.02. It is found and determined that it is in the best interests of Medina and its storm water
management program that the District be established. The District shall be comprised of the land
legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto.
Section II. Establishment: Authorizations.
2.01. The Meadowview Commons Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District is hereby
established. The City shall have all powers and authority conferred by the Act in the operation and
financing of the activities of the District.
2.02. The boundaries of the District include all property described in Exhibit A, attached
hereto and are depicted in the map on Exhibit B, attached hereto.
2.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with
the Auditor and Recorder of Hennepin County.
Section III. This ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and publication and the
recording of the plat of Meadowview Commons in Hennepin County.
Ordinance No. ###
DATE 2
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Medina this ______day of ___________, 2020
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
_____________________________________
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
Published in the Crow River News on this ______ day of ________, 2020.
Ordinance No. ###
DATE A-1
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description of property contained within boundaries of
Meadowview Commons Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District
Lots 1 through 6, Block 1;
Lots 1 through 5, Block 2;
Lots 1 through 5, Block 3;
Lots 1 through 5, Block 4;
Lots 1 through 5, Block 5;
Lots 1 through 5, Block 6;
Lots 1 through 4, Block 7;
Lots 1 through 3, Block 8;
Lots 1 through 5, Block 9;
Lots 1 through 4, Block 10;
Outlots A through D; and
Outlots F through Q, all in Meadowview Commons, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Ordinance No. ###
DATE B-1
EXHIBIT B
Map of Meadowview Commons Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District
Location of Meadowview Commons Sewer Improvement Tax District
Resolution No. 2020-##
DATE
Member ________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-##
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF
ORDINANCE NO. ### BY TITLE AND SUMMARY
WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an
ordinance establishing the Meadowview Commons Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statues § 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publications by title and
summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and
WHEREAS, the ordinance is four pages in length and contains a map; and
WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform
the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina
that the city clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. ### to be published in the
official newspaper in lieu of the ordinance in its entirety:
Public Notice
The city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ##, an ordinance establishing
the Meadowview Commons Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District. The tax district applies to
the property within the Meadowview Commons townhome development and would allow the
City to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain and otherwise improve storm sewer
systems and related facilities related to the District and to levy a tax on all taxable property within
the District to finance such activities.
The full text of the ordinance is available from the city clerk at Medina city hall during regular
business hours.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina that the city
clerk keep a copy of the ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that she post
a full copy of the ordinance in a public place within the city.
Resolution No. 2020-## 2
DATE
Dated: .
______________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ________
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director
DATE: December 10, 2020
MEETING: December 15, 2020
SUBJECT: Clean-Up Day 2021 - Trees
With Clean-Up Day on the horizon the window for ordering trees is closing fast. Due to the
pandemic, we were forced to cancel last year’s tree order. I prefer to avoid canceling on our
vendor again in 2021.
We successfully organized a “touchless clean-up” process last year and I am confident we can do
the same in 2021, if necessary. The sale of trees has long been a part of Medina’s reforestation
effort as well as a great community project. It is also my plan to order extra trees to plant in park
projects.
It is Staff’s recommendation to move forward with the event, thus we are looking for council
direction.
Agenda Item # 8E
Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 December 15, 2020
City Council Meeting
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director; through City Administrator Scott Johnson
DATE: December 9, 2020
SUBJ: Planning Department Updates – December 15, 2020 City Council Meeting
Land Use Application Review
A) Three Rivers Park Outdoor Learning Center CUP – 4001 County Road 24 – Three Rivers
Park has requested a Conditional Use Permit for construction of a 1900 square foot building
in the Outdoor Learning Center. The building would include showers and an infirmary for
guests. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the November 10 meeting. No
one spoke at the hearing. The Commission unanimously recommended approval of the
amended CUP. The Council reviewed on December 1 and directed staff to prepare a
resolution of approval, which will be presented to the Council on December 15.
B) Weston Woods Preliminary Plat and PUD General Plan – east of Mohawk Drive, north of
Highway 55 – Mark Smith (Mark of Excellence Homes) has requested a Preliminary Plat
and PUD General Plan for development of 76 twinhomes, 42 single-family, and 33
townhomes on the Roy and Cavanaugh properties. The Planning Commission held a public
hearing at the November 10 meeting. Two comments were received and one person spoke
at the meeting in favor of the project. Following the hearing, the Commission unanimously
recommended approval. Staff intends to present the application to the City Council on
December 15.
C) Pioneer Trail Preserve – 2325 Pioneer Tr. – James and Melissa Korin have requested a 3-
lot subdivision of a 40 acre parcel. Staff is conducting preliminary review and will prepare
for public hearing when complete, potentially at the January 12 Commission meeting.
D) Holy Name Lake Estates – north of Pinto Drive, northwest of Holy Name Lake – Donavon
DesMarais has requested preliminary plat approval for a six-lot rural subdivision. The
applicant also requests a variance from the maximum cul-de-sac length to expand Pinto
Drive to serve the site. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the November 10
meeting. A number of neighbors spoke at the hearing, mainly asking questions about the
construction. Following the hearing, the Commission unanimously recommended approval
of the variance and preliminary plat. The Council granted preliminary plat approval, with
variance, at the December 1 meeting. Staff will await final plat application.
E) Schwarz Accessory Dwelling Unit – 1425 County Road 24 – Chaid and Jessica Schwarz
have requested a conditional use permit to convert an existing home to an accessory
dwelling unit to allow construction of a new home on their property. The CUP would also
permit three accessory structures on the site. The applicant is considering withdrawing the
application because they do not believe they will proceed with the renovation for the ADU
at this time.
F) Cates Ranch Comp Plan Amendment and Rezoning – 2575 and 2590 Cates Ranch Drive –
Robert Atkinson has requested a change of the future land use from Future Development
Area to Business, a staging plan amendment to 2020, and a rezoning to Business Park. The
application is incomplete for review, and the City has requested additional materials.
G) Roehl Final Plat – 1735 Medina Road – The Estate of Robert Roehl has requested a
preliminary plat to subdivide 28 acres into two lots. The City Council granted preliminary
Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 December 15, 2020
City Council Meeting
plat approval on June 16. The applicant has requested final plat approval. The Council
adopted a resolution of approval at the October 6 meeting. Staff will work with the
applicant on conditions of approval before the plat is recorded.
H) Ditter Subdivision – 2032-2052 Holy Name Drive – Tom and Jim Ditter have requested
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and Interim Use Permit to
replat their existing four lots into five lots. The City Council adopted documents of
approval on September 15. The Met Council has reviewed the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment and authorized the City to put it into effect. Staff will await final plat
application.
I) Adam’s Pest Control Site Plan Review, Pre Plat, Rezoning – Jan-Har, LLP (dba Adam’s
Pest Control) has requested various approvals for development of a 35,000 s.f. office
building, restaurant, and 13,000 s.f. warehouse/repair shop north of Highway 55, west of
Willow Drive (PIDs 04-118-23-21-0001 and 04-118-23-24-0001). The Planning
Commission held a public hearing at the November 12 and March 10 meetings and
recommended approval. The City Council adopted approval documents on March 17.
J) Johnson ADU CUP, Hamel Brewery, St. Peter and Paul Cemetery – The City Council has
adopted resolutions approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants with the
conditions of approval in order to complete the projects.
K) Hamel Haven subdivision – These subdivisions have received final approval. Staff is
working with the applicants on the conditions of approval before the plat is recorded.
Other Projects
A) Density Regulations/Sound Suppression Bonus – As directed by the Minnesota
Department of Labor and Industry, staff is preparing an ordinance amendment removing the
option for additional density for residential projects which incorporate sound suppression
into buildings. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 8 and
recommended approval. Staff intends to present the ordinance to the Council on December
15.
B) Meander Road Analysis – Staff continues to review sightlines and other matters presented
by the petition from residents of Fields of Medina. Staff had already intended to stripe the
east side of Meander at County Road 116 to provide a wider shoulder for pedestrian use.
Staff is preparing options to improve sightlines coming out of Jubert Drive onto Meander
Road.
C) Council Orientation – Staff took part in the orientation for new Council members
TO: City Council
FROM: Jason Nelson, Director of Public Safety,
Through City Administrator Scott Johnson
DATE: December 10, 2020
RE: Department Updates
In the past two weeks we have added two new Reserves to our police department team. It has been
several years since we have added personnel to our Reserve program. The first is Justin Cook who
resides in Rockford and is on the Rockford Fire Department. Justin is a military veteran who loves
being part of our team and is in the office training almost daily. The second is Holly Haynes,
originally from Texas, who resides in Loretto. Holly is a senior CIP compliance officer for Midwest
Reliability Corporation. Haynes was looking to do some volunteering and was told about the
Reserve program. After speaking with others in the Loretto community, she felt that being a
Reserve would be a great fit for her. We are very lucky to have her join our team.
In what has been a whirlwind from April 2020 when I first took over until now is finally starting to
slow down somewhat. I have been busy working on year end training mandates and updating our
policy and procedure manual to ensure that all POST mandates are completed. I continue to
evaluate internally how to best protect our staff from COVID and COVID related issues. I am
working with the Hennepin and Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association, along with our Lakes Area
Emergency Management Group, on best practices for a protentional COVID vaccination that is not
that far off.
We continue to prepare for future civil unrest with the addition of new equipment and mandated
Mobile Field Force Training for all officers in Hennepin County should situations arise in the future.
Patrol:
Patrol Updates 11/10/2020 through 12/09/2020
Patrol Activities – Between the dates of November 10, 2020 through December 9, 2020 our officers
issued 98 citations and 195 warnings for various traffic violations. There were 11 property damage
accidents reported (8 involved deer), 1 personal injury accident, 19 medicals, 7 welfare
checks/mental health calls, 8 business alarms, 14 residential alarms, 12 suspicious calls, 2 civil
matter calls, 5 disturbances, and 18 assists to other agencies, 34 winter parking restriction violation
warnings given.
MEMORANDUM
On 11/12/2020 at approximately 1050 hours Officer located a vehicle on the side of the road in the
area of Highway 55 and Willow Drive. The Officer stopped to check on the driver and found him to
be unconscious behind the wheel of the running vehicle. The Officer requested an ambulance and
ultimately was able to wake the driver who was believed to be under the influence of a controlled
substance. The driver was transported to the hospital. A search warrant was obtained for a blood
sample which was sent to the BCA for analysis. Charges are pending the blood results.
On 11/13/2020 Officer was dispatched to a reported injury accident at the intersection of Highway
55 and County Road 101. Three patients were transported to the hospital with minor injuries. Due
to conflicting stories the Officer was unable to determine who was at fault for the accident.
On 11/14/2020 Officer was contacted by Zumbrota Police Department who advised they had
recovered a stolen motor vehicle and inside recovered property believed to belong to a Medina
resident. An Officer was able to contact the father of the owner of the property that was recovered,
and it was believed that the theft occurred in the city of Minneapolis.
On 11/16/2020 Officer took a stolen trailer report in the city of Loretto. A resident reported an
aluminum trailer was missing from the front yard of their residence. The trailer was entered as
stolen and to date has not been recovered.
On 11/17/2020 Officers responded to a suspected theft in progress at the Medina Target. Asset
Protection was reporting two suspects inside the store bagging up merchandise throughout the store
and were believed to be going to conduct a “push out” with the merchandise. Officers set up in the
area and the male suspect exited the store with a cart full of unpaid merchandise and was seen
putting the items into a vehicle parked in the lot. The suspect then spotted officers in the lot and ran
back inside Target. Officers moved in and were able to detain the female suspect who was still
inside the store. The male suspect ran to the back of the store and was caught after exiting a fire exit
door. Both suspects are facing theft charges from the incident.
On 11/19/2020 Officer was dispatched to a reported drug overdose in the 400 block of Medina Street
North in the city of Loretto. Upon arrival it was discovered that a female at the residence had
already administered Narcan to the victim and the victim was now conscious. The victim refused to
go to the hospital after being checked by paramedics.
On 11/21/2020 Officer was dispatched to the Verizon store on a report of a possible electrical fire at
the business. Hamel Fire Department also responded and after arriving on scene it was determined
that a water heater had gone dry and the heating element had overheated the water heater. The unit
was unplugged until it could get serviced.
On 11/22/2020 Officer was dispatched to what was reported as a possible shooting in the 500 block
of Hamel Road. The homeowner reported finding her husband unresponsive on the floor of a
bedroom and believed he may have shot himself the previous day. Upon further investigation it was
determined that victim was believed to have died after suffering some sort of medical problem and
no gun was involved.
On 11/25/2020 Officers were dispatched to a suspected overdose in the 400 block of Medina Street
North in Loretto. While Officers were en route they learned the victim had been administered
Narcan by a roommate and was conscious. Upon arrival the victim was seen by North Paramedics
but again refused to go to the hospital.
On 11/26/2020 Officer was dispatched to a reported drug overdose in the 3400 block of Elm Creek
Drive. Upon arrival the Officer found the victim unconscious with no pulse. The Officer
administered two different doses of Narcan and the patient regained a pulse and ultimately regained
consciousness. The patient was transported to the hospital. It was learned the victim and roommate
had decided to try heroin for the first time which led to the overdose.
On 11/30/2020 Officer was dispatched to Highway 55 Liquors on an attempted theft. The employee
reported two suspicious males had entered the store and one of them grabbed multiple bottles of
tequila and began walking towards the exit. The employee stopped him and asked for an ID. The
male did not provide an ID and gave the employee some choice words before leaving in an SUV
with no plates. Shortly after this incident Plymouth Police was dispatched to theft reports from two
of their liquor stores involving the same suspects and vehicle. Plymouth Police is investigating.
On 12/02/2020 at 0226 hours Officers were dispatched to suspected car prowlers in the area of the
4500 block of Trillium Drive in the Bridgewater Development. Officers were unable to locate the
suspect vehicle, but it was later learned that several vehicles in the area had been tampered with, but
nothing reported missing.
On 12/02/2020 Officer was dispatched to an employee theft report at Holiday, 1300 Baker Park
Road. The manager reported an employee had been conducting refunds at the register and pocketing
the money. It was determined the aggregated value was a felony level. The employee was placed
under arrest and ultimately booked into Hennepin County Jail.
Investigations:
Investigated a possible violation of a harassment restraining order. The victim reported the suspect
contacted them over 40 times by phone. I was able to verify the order was current and the report was
sent to the city attorney’s office for charging.
Investigating an attempted fraud attempt. Victim reported that someone hacked their bank account
and was now attempting to send money through a Cash App. I have sent an administrative subpoena
to the Cash App company to obtain more information.
Took a report of a theft from a liquor store. I have sent out a crime alert with pictures of the suspects.
Investigating an employee theft from a business. The employee stole a few thousand dollars over a
period of a few months. I am awaiting further video evidence from the business before I will send
the report to the County Attorney’s office for charging.
There are currently (10) cases assigned to investigations.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council, through City Administrator Scott Johnson
FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director
DATE: December 9, 2020
MEETING: December 15, 2020
SUBJECT: Public Works Update
STREETS
• The streets are in good shape with no snow events in the past two weeks.
• I will be working on feasibility reports for Tower Drive West and Shire Drive. Both
streets reside in business areas and will be assessed according to our assessment policy.
These projects were pushed forward from last year’s CIP – and I will be managing them.
WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER
• A significant software upgrade is required at the water treatment plant in Hamel, which is
in the capital plan for 2021. I will begin gathering quotes soon.
• Thanks to the unseasonably warm weather, Jack Gleason has accomplished some
stormwater infrastructure inspections for 2020.
• The carp gate on Ardmore Creek is installed which will help fulfill the phosphorus
reduction program obligation for Lake Independence.
• The City of Loretto is installing the sewer infrastructure to start decommissioning of the
sewer ponds.
PARKS/TRAILS
• Public Works has devoted many hours to remove fallen and still-standing dead trees in
The Enclave’s Harriet’s Woods. We found a combination of diseased trees and trees that
did not survive the constant wet conditions. I will begin work on a reforesting plan for
this area and will obtain recommendations from our consultant on species that thrive in
damp soil. Residents/neighbors have already shown interest in this project.
• Jodi Gallup and I have been working on the plan for Hunter Lions Park, which is
expensive. It will require patience for Public Works to complete much of this work,
however, this will considerably reduce costs.
MISCELLANEOUS
• The gates for the compost/brush pile open via a timer each morning at 7:00 am, then
close at 3:30 pm. Residents are required to enter through the city hall parking lot as the
County 24 gate is now an exit only.
• I plan to discuss cleanup day trees at the council meeting because the order needs to be
placed soon. I am confident we can do this in a safe manner, even during the pandemic.
ORDER CHECKS DECEMBER 1, 2020 – DECEMBER 15, 2020
051002 D.S. BAHR CONSTRUCTION ................................................... $371.50
051003 GLOBAL CLOSING & TITLE SERVICE ..................................... $111.41
051004 HARRIES, JULIE/KURT .......................................................... $1,050.00
051005 KB SCULPT LLC ......................................................................... $92.12
051006 KOCHS KORNER, LLC ............................................................. $700.00
051007 MD QUALITY CONSTRUCTION ................................................ $440.00
051008 MET COUNCIL (SAC) ........................................................... $12,300.75
051009 METRO WEST INSPECTION ............................................... $11,655.53
051010 THREE RIVERS PARK (BAKERPARK) .................................. $7,869.50
051011 TITLESMART, INC .................................................................... $343.50
051012 DAMA CO .................................................................................. $379.00
051013 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC ............................................ $182.44
051014 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC ................................................ $314.55
051015 FEHN COMPANIES INC ......................................................... $1,000.00
051016 HOLIDAY (CARWASHES) ........................................................... $70.76
051017 JDS MARKETING .......................................................................... $1.02
051018 MARCO (LEASE) .................................................................... $1,555.95
051019 ORONO BASEBALL ASSN. ....................................................... $500.00
051020 PULTE GROUP ........................................................................... $88.84
051021 SORENSON, ANDREW/SARAH .................................................. $78.69
051022 SWANSON HOMES .................................................................... $43.25
051023 VOGEL, JULIANNE ..................................................................... $52.89
051024 CHARLES CUDD CO, LLC ..................................................... $5,000.00
051025 CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN ......................................................... $1,002.94
051026 STEWART TITLE COMPANY .................................................... $188.26
051027 ACME TOOLS ........................................................................... $239.79
051028 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSN` ........................................ $260.00
051029 ASPEN MILLS INC .................................................................... $573.14
051030 BEAUDRY OIL & PROPANE .................................................. $2,792.08
051031 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC ....................................................... $33.75
051032 CITY OF CORCORAN ............................................................ $4,024.28
051033 DESIGNING NATURE, INC. ................................................... $4,816.00
051034 DPC INDUSTRIES INC ........................................................... $1,226.63
051035 EARL F ANDERSEN INC .......................................................... $237.18
051036 ECM PUBLISHERS INC ............................................................ $459.08
051037 ESS BROS. & SONS, INC. ........................................................ $535.00
051038 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO. ............................................... $227.79
051039 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL .................................................... $201.15
051040 GREAT AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVI .................................... $178.95
051041 HACH COMPANY ...................................................................... $682.43
051042 HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES I ............................. $1,000.00
051043 HAMEL LUMBER INC .................................................................. $94.61
051044 HAMEL LIONS CLUB ................................................................ $525.00
051045 HENN COUNTY INFO TECH .................................................. $2,214.91
051046 MATTHEW E HUNZ .................................................................. $190.80
051047 INTL CITY/COUNTY MGMT ASSN ............................................ $667.26
051048 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC ............................................................ $229.29
051049 KENNEDY & GRAVEN CHARTERED .................................. $16,175.25
051050 LANO EQUIPMENT INC ............................................................ $201.85
051051 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR .................................................. $558.00
051052 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT INC .......................................... $39.00
051053 CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN ......................................................... $5,898.01
051054 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ................................................. $33,322.64
051055 MINGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES ........................... $19,870.46
051056 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ................................................. $23.00
051057 MORRIS ELECTRONICS INC. .................................................. $380.00
051058 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC ........................................................ $15.98
051059 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS ................................ $4,496.06
051060 NORTHWEST HENNEPIN......................................................... $200.00
051061 OFFICE DEPOT .......................................................................... $65.71
051062 CITY OF ORONO ................................................................... $1,087.22
051063 QUALITY RESOURCE GROUP INC.......................................... $113.37
051064 RANDY'S SANITATION INC ........................................................ $40.00
051065 RUSSELL SECURITY RESOURCE INC .................................... $902.50
051066 STREICHER'S ........................................................................... $615.97
051067 TALLEN & BAERTSCHI .......................................................... $1,475.59
051068 TIMESAVER OFFSITE .............................................................. $703.75
051069 TOTAL CONTROL SYSTEMS INC. ........................................ $4,091.38
051070 ULINE ........................................................................................ $111.30
051071 SSI MN TRANCHE 3 #10327096 ............................................ $3,631.78
051072 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE .................................................. $92.00
051073 WSB & ASSOCIATES ........................................................... $41,018.00
Total Checks $201,930.84
ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS DECEMBER 1, 2020 – DECEMBER 15, 2020
005733E PR PERA .............................................................................. $17,288.18
005734E PR FED/FICA ....................................................................... $17,399.37
005735E PR MN Deferred Comp ........................................................... $1,840.00
005736E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA .................................................. $3,832.20
005737E CITY OF MEDINA ........................................................................ $21.00
005738E FURTHER .............................................................................. $1,827.42
005739E FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL ....................................... $170.00
005740E PR PERA .............................................................................. $18,310.52
005741E PR FED/FICA ....................................................................... $17,285.97
005742E PR MN Deferred Comp ........................................................... $1,840.00
005743E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA .................................................. $3,991.86
005744E CITY OF MEDINA ........................................................................ $21.00
005745E FURTHER .............................................................................. $1,827.42
005746E MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT ............................................. $710.00
005747E AFLAC ....................................................................................... $324.66
005748E CULLIGAN-METRO ..................................................................... $33.70
005749E DELTA DENTAL ..................................................................... $2,538.70
005750E FP MAILING SOL POSTAGE BY PHON ................................. $1,000.00
005751E FURTHER ..................................................................................... $9.59
005752E PAYMENT SERVICE NETWORK INC ....................................... $954.86
005753E VALVOLINE FLEET SERVICES ................................................ $102.68
005754E XCEL ENERGY ...................................................................... $2,576.41
005755E CENTURYLINK.......................................................................... $247.68
005756E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC ........................................................... $817.64
Total Electronic Checks $94,970.86
PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT – NOVEMBER 25, 2020 & DECEMBER 9, 2020
0510650 BILLMAN, JACKSON CARROLL ............................................... $632.00
0510651 BOEDDEKER, KAYLEN C ...................................................... $1,371.31
0510652 JOHNSON, PATRICK M. ........................................................... $633.53
0510653 VOGEL, NICHOLE ....................................................................... $83.11
0510654 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L. ................................................... $1,521.00
0510655 BARNHART, ERIN A. ............................................................. $2,514.01
0510656 BOECKER, KEVIN D. ............................................................. $2,484.51
0510657 CONVERSE, KEITH A. ........................................................... $2,203.03
0510658 DEMARS, LISA ....................................................................... $1,377.71
0510659 DINGMANN, IVAN W ................................................................. $179.07
0510660 DION, DEBRA A. .................................................................... $1,765.69
0510661 ENDE, JOSEPH...................................................................... $2,183.91
0510662 FINKE, DUSTIN D. ................................................................. $2,650.69
0510663 GALLUP, JODI M. ................................................................... $2,119.19
0510664 GLEASON, JOHN M. .............................................................. $2,194.12
0510665 GREGORY, THOMAS ............................................................ $2,423.48
0510666 HALL, DAVID M. ..................................................................... $2,409.20
0510667 HANSON, JUSTIN .................................................................. $1,808.41
0510668 JACOBSON, NICOLE ................................................................ $819.36
0510669 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S. .......................................................... $2,258.13
0510670 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. ............................................................ $2,286.95
0510671 KLAERS, ANNE M. ................................................................. $1,427.40
0510672 LEUER, GREGORY J. ............................................................ $2,021.95
0510673 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. .................................................. $1,973.68
0510674 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D .......................................................... $2,014.46
0510675 NELSON, JASON ................................................................... $2,531.60
0510676 REINKING, DEREK M ............................................................ $2,313.33
0510677 SCHARF, ANDREW ............................................................... $2,514.71
0510678 SCHERER, STEVEN T. .......................................................... $2,372.91
0510679 WILSON, KIMBERLY ................................................................... $83.11
0510680 BILLMAN, JACKSON CARROLL ............................................... $672.25
0510681 BOEDDEKER, KAYLEN C ...................................................... $1,741.40
0510682 JOHNSON, PATRICK M. ........................................................... $633.53
0510683 ALBERS, TODD M. .................................................................... $230.87
0510684 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L. ................................................... $1,521.00
0510685 ANDERSON, JOHN G. .............................................................. $230.87
0510686 BARNHART, ERIN A. ............................................................. $2,514.86
0510687 BOECKER, KEVIN D. ............................................................. $2,635.51
0510688 CONVERSE, KEITH A. ........................................................... $1,978.15
0510689 DEMARS, LISA ....................................................................... $1,442.52
0510690 DESLAURIES, DEAN ................................................................ $230.87
0510691 DION, DEBRA A. .................................................................... $1,914.13
0510692 ENDE, JOSEPH...................................................................... $1,722.83
0510693 FINKE, DUSTIN D. ................................................................. $2,651.15
0510694 GALLUP, JODI M. ................................................................... $2,119.64
0510695 GLEASON, JOHN M. .............................................................. $2,239.04
0510696 GREGORY, THOMAS ............................................................ $2,332.59
0510697 HALL, DAVID M. ..................................................................... $4,104.23
0510698 HANSON, JUSTIN .................................................................. $2,017.27
0510699 JACOBSON, NICOLE ................................................................ $819.36
0510700 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S. .......................................................... $2,530.00
0510701 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. ............................................................ $2,286.94
0510702 KLAERS, ANNE M. ................................................................. $1,427.39
0510703 LEUER, GREGORY J. ............................................................ $2,208.00
0510704 MARTIN, KATHLEEN M ............................................................ $327.07
0510705 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. .................................................. $1,505.33
0510706 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D .......................................................... $2,014.46
0510707 NELSON, JASON ................................................................... $2,533.28
0510708 PEDERSON, JEFF .................................................................... $230.87
0510709 REINKING, DEREK M ............................................................ $1,874.98
0510710 SCHARF, ANDREW ............................................................... $3,046.21
0510711 SCHERER, STEVEN T. .......................................................... $2,372.91
Total Payroll Direct Deposit $109,281.07