HomeMy Public PortalAbout20170612plCC 701-32
DOCUMENTS IN THIS PACKET INCLUDE:
LETTERS FROM CITIZENS TO THE
MAYOR OR CITY COUNCIL
RESPONSES FROM STAFF TO LETTERS FROM CITIZENS
ITEMS FROM MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
ITEMS FROM OTHER COMMITTEES AND AGENCIES
ITEMS FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE, AND REGIONAL AGENCIES
Prepared for: 6/12/2017
Document dates: 5/24/2017 – 5/31/2017
Set 1
Note: Documents for every category may not have been received for packet
reproduction in a given week.
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/31/2017 11:21 AM
1
Carnahan, David
From:David Coale <david@evcl.com>
Sent:Wednesday, May 31, 2017 10:52 AM
To:Council, City
Cc:Hodge, Bruce; Bret Andersen; Sandra Slater; Elaine Uang
Subject:Sustainability and Climate Action Plan
Dear Council,
I am resending this letter to you as the original meeting on the Sustainability and Climate Action Plan in April
was re-scheduled to this next Monday and you might have over looked this with all the other letters concerning the ADU issues that took up all the time at that earlier meeting.
Thanks,
David Coale Carbon Free Palo Alto
------------
Dear city council,
Happy Earth Day! Here we are once again getting an update on our sustainability plan. While Palo Alto has made a lot of progress and maybe ahead of many other cities, we think the Council has lost its way and focus on
this, the most important issue of our time – Climate Change.
Here are some recent examples: The greatest reduction in GHG has been the switch to a carbon neutral
electricity supply. This is a great achievement and was driven by Carbon Free Palo Alto, a concerned group of citizens trying to do the best we can to address climate change. As a follow on to this, the fuel switching effort, was started by a colleagues’ memo written and proposed by CFPA wanting to see the next steps to address
climate change come about in a timely fashion. The next big reduction is the “green gas” program where Palo
Alto buys RECs for our natural gas use. Again largely driven by a concerned group of citizens worried that
Palo Alto is not moving fast enough to really address climate change. The city has been very supportive of these programs and now calls them their own. Great, Palo Alto is moving forward; but not because this was council driven, they were followers.
What is council doing? Recently you approved a 339-space parking garage for 23 million. This parking garage
will make it easier for people to drive instead of using other means to get downtown. For each pound of cement
produced, a pound of CO2 is generated and for each pound of steel produced there are four pounds of CO2 produced. So just the building of the garage will produce a lot of GHG. But the greater GHG emissions will come from the induced car trips, most of them in SOV that this garage will generate. All of this is in direct
conflict with the goals stated in the Sustainability Implementation Plan under the Mobility section – a section
that is addressing the largest piece of the GHG pie for Palo Alto (66%).
In other actions, or non-actions, the council has put on hold indefinitely a bike share program that would have cost 1 million and has not adequately funded the TMA program to address parking, congestion and GHG
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/31/2017 11:21 AM
2
emissions. These are the types of programs along with more housing that can really make a difference. This is
a sign of a council that has lost its way to addressing the most important issue of our time – climate change.
Sustainability must be addressed every day with every action, not revisited once or a few times a year. This daily vigilance will payback with solutions to most all other issues. We would like to see the council
reprioritize sustainability so that we are not building parking garages that will induce more SOV and traffic and
instead spend that money on real lasting solutions that carry us in a more sustainable way, in to the future we all
want.
For instance, if the TMA effort were fully funded at the required level, the parking garage would not be needed and could then be turned into affordable housing. Now this is really moving us in the right directions on many
fronts and would be probably more profitable in the long run. In these changing times, with the increased use of
ridesharing services, it is conceivable that the parking garage will be obsolete in 10 years or less.
We were very hopeful that the new sustainability office would be able to help keep the council on track with
these kinds of daily decisions, weighing in on these important issues to help guide the council to a more sustainable future, but this has only happened in a few cases and it has been left up to concerned citizens to address these issues when they have the time and energy to do so. Again, to us, this is a sign of a council that
has lost its way and has not prioritized the most important issues facing Palo Alto.
Why is this so important? Climate change is a zero sum game (not really a game!) While Palo Alto may be
doing better than our neighbors, we are still far behind what is required to address climate change. Palo Alto is a leader in this area and we have the means to really set the goals where they should be and to show the way
forward on this. Addressing the solutions to climate change and sustainability in general will pay off in the long
run, in almost all areas, and that is the game we all need to win.
So this is our request to council and staff: reprioritize your efforts and make sure you view every decision
through the lens of sustainability and GHG reductions. Seek the assistance of the office of sustainability in this goal, and never miss a chance to move the needle in the right direction. This will serve you and all Palo Altons
very well, now and into the future. And remember, as cliché as it is, Earth Day is everyday!
Carbon Free Palo Alto
Bruce Hodge
David Coale
Bret Anderson
Sandra Slater
Elaine Uang
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/25/2017 7:17 AM
1
Carnahan, David
From:hugo_sarrazin@mckinsey.com
Sent:Wednesday, May 24, 2017 12:57 PM
To:City Mgr; Council, City; Scharff, Gregory (internal)
Subject:Castilleja's proposal
Dear City Manager, Mayor Scharff, and Members of the City Council:
As a Palo Alto resident and parent of two Castilleja students (current and alum), I am writing to express my strong support for
Castilleja and its plans to modernize its campus. Castilleja's most recent proposal reflects a genuine effort to be responsive to its
neighbors and blend in with the surrounding community. Castilleja has a track record of controlling traffic and parking issues,
and can be trusted to continue to do so.
At a time where Silicon Valley is being criticized for its lack of women diversity (in tech roles and in VCs), Castilleja is the
only, non-sectarian all-girls school on the west coast. I have witness firsthand how it plays a critical role in educating the next
generation of female leaders in tech, business, academia, non-profit, and our community. Castilleja's students are also intensely
engaged in many non-profit initiatives across Palo Alto and beyond and has a result our community is stronger. Finally, many
of these girls go-on to graduate from leading institution and comeback to play pre-imminent roles in our community.
Castilleja can trace its history back almost as far as the founding of Palo Alto and is tightly linked with Stanford University. Its
commitment to excellence mirrors our community's commitment to education. The plan is prudent, helps modernize antiquated
facilities, and helps grow enrollment modestly to ensure the program remains diverse and competitive (choice become limited –
particularly in STEM - for high-school students w/o a sufficient number of students).
Please support Castilleja's efforts to stay relevant and provide a meaningful 21st century education to the young women of our
city, our community, and our region.
.
Thank you,
Hugo
Dr. Hugo Sarrazin - Senior Partner Silicon Valley Global Leader of the McKinsey Digital Labs
Direct: +1-650-842-5539 | Mobile: +1-214-205-4873 | @HugoSarrazin
+========================================================================+
This email is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it in error, please notify us immediately and then delete it. Please do not copy it, disclose its contents or use it for any purpose.
+========================================================================+
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/25/2017 8:12 AM
1
Carnahan, David
From:RAS <fogz9000-1@yahoo.com>
Sent:Thursday, May 25, 2017 8:07 AM
To:Gerhardt, Jodie
Cc:Council, City; Planning Enforcement
Subject:Fw: 2190 edgewood
Attachments:ep09.jpg; ep01.jpg; ep02.jpg; ep03.jpg; ep04.jpg; ep05.jpg; ep06.jpg; ep07.jpg; ep08.jpg
Dear Jodie Gerhardt, I am again following up to determine if you received my email below on April 25th? I also left you a voice
mail with the same question on May 17th but have received no response from either of these efforts. Please
let me know if I need to submit this to someone else. Thank you.
Bests,
~~~Rick Skalsky
PRIVATE: This is Not A Public Communication! This private email message, and any attachment(s) is covered
by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and is for the sole use of the intended recipient and contains privileged and/or confidential information.
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: RAS <fogz9000-1@yahoo.com>
To: "Jodie.Gerhardt@CityofPaloAlto.org" <Jodie.Gerhardt@CityofPaloAlto.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 1:44 PM
Subject: 2190 edgewood
Dear Jodie Gerhardt, I recently called the Zoning Enforcement Dept. to report the following issue but they told me I needed to
contact you with this issue. I sent similar info to Penny Ellson and she said she was going to forward it to the
traffic dept. so this may cross with her info. Also I'm not sure if she was going to include the photos.
ISSUE - Trucks unloading on St. Francis for Edgewood Shopping Center contrary to the agreement between the city and the shopping center developer....
Eleana Lee informed me last fall that all deliveries are to be made in the Edgewood shopping center parking lots
during business hours per the agreement with the developer. This was also what we St. Francis homeowners were told by the city and developer at the development and planning meetings. Instead 6-10 or more trucks unload on St. Francis 365 days a year from as early as 5:30AM to as late as midnight. The bagel shop even
built a crude loading ramp on the St. Francis side of their store, close to the stop sign at Channing and St.
Francis. Every day, city workers drive by this site as this is a shortcut into and out of North Palo Alto, and no
city worker has ever made an issue of this. Sometimes, city workers park in the same area while they run in for coffee or bagels or lunch.
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/25/2017 8:12 AM
2
Trucks (some large semi size with large trailers) are blocking the bike lane, sticking out into street traffic, and
causing cars on the other side of St. Francis to drive in the far bike lane as cars heading to Channing have to
cross the center line to get around trucks parked outside the bagel shop while they unload for the Chinese restaurant, the bagel shop, the dry cleaner and others. Thus we have the bike lanes on both sides of St. Francis
being misused due to the trucks unloading. It's making it very hard and unsafe for residents to leave their
driveways on St. Francis. Bicyclists have to drive around trucks out into the car traffic as well. Please enforce
the city's agreement with Edgewood that all truck deliveries are to be made in the parking lots during regular
business hours and have the shopping center remove the loading ramp that was built on St. Francis. I've attached some pictures to give you an idea of this situation. The one showing the little child on their bike
going around a van parked in the bike lane was especially chilling since the child didn't even look first before
driving out into the traffic lane to go around the van. Fortunately, that time, a car wasn't behind them. We've
already had numerous fender benders here due to this mess that the shopping center has created.
I've also seen two times when pedestrians crossing St. Francis to go to the dry cleaner or starbucks were nearly
struck by cars speeding down St. Francis to try to beat the green light at Embarcadero. Needless to say, this
entire St. Francis block abutting the Edgewood Plaza has become a high risk area to try to get out of one's
driveway. We homeowners on this street need some city help now, before a tragedy occurs here. Thank you
for any assistance you can offer. Part of the agreement was that the shopping center was not supposed to have a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood, but it has a significant negative impact. I have met with
all the homeowners on this entire block of St. Francis and they are all willing to meet with the city or sign a
formal request or whatever it takes to get some relief from these issues.
I am a longtime resident of Palo Alto and if you have any questions or need more pictures (I have collected quite a few), please call me at 650 856 95 29. I live on the corner of Channing and St. Francis with my
driveway on St. Francis.
Thank you again for any assistance you can provide. But please do something.
Bests,
~~~Rick Skalsky
P.S. Pictures ep02, ep04, ep06 and ep07 show the loading ramp that was built outside the bagel shop.
PRIVATE: This is Not A Public Communication! This private email message, and any attachment(s) is covered
by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and is for the sole use of the intended
recipient and contains privileged and/or confidential information.
... "' •
..
,
'· • • I ~ , ·~ ~-r ' . t ' • ), .. }"~
' ..
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/25/2017 7:18 AM
1
Carnahan, David
From:Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>
Sent:Wednesday, May 24, 2017 2:00 PM
To:Dan Richard; boardmembers; Mayor; CityManager; Mark Standriff;
esmeralda.soria@fresno.gov; paul.caprioglio; jboren; bmcewen; kfsndesk; newsdesk;
Council, City; terry; rosenheim@kpix.cbs.com; Daniel Zack; David Balakian;
dennisbalakian; dwalters; Paul Dictos; robert.andersen; bretthedrick; beachrides;
bballpod; Leodies Buchanan; Cathy Lewis; Chris Field; firstvp@fresnopoa.org;
fmerlo@wildelectric.net; Gary Turgeon; Greg.Gatzka; huidentalsanmateo; steve.hogg;
hennessy; info@superide1.com; Joel Stiner; Jason Tarvin; kclark; leager; mmt4
@pge.com; midge@thebarretts.com; mthibodeaux@electriclaboratories.com;
scott.mozier; nick yovino; President; popoff; richard.wenzel; russ@topperjewelers.com;
Tranil Thomas; Steve Wayte; thomas.esqueda@fresno.gov
Subject:Fwd: HSR line- Toronto, Canada for $20 billion running by 2031
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>
Date: Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:10 AM
Subject: Fwd: HSR line- Toronto, Canada for $20 billion running by 2031 To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Date: Tue, May 23, 2017 at 4:25 PM
Subject: Fwd: HSR line- Toronto, Canada for $20 billion running by 2031
To: Dan Richard <danrichard@mac.com>, boardmembers <boardmembers@hsr.ca.gov>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>
Date: Tue, May 23, 2017 at 4:14 PM
Subject: HSR line- Toronto, Canada for $20 billion running by 2031
To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>
Wednesday, May 24, 2017
Mr. Dan Richard
Chairman of the Board California High Speed Rail Authority
Dan- Congratulations on Caltrain winning the $647 million in federal money to electrify the Caltrain
line. KCBS is reporting it, saying it will be a big boost for California high speed rail. Not a word yet on local
TV in Fresno that I have seen.
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/25/2017 7:18 AM
2
For those living outside of California, Caltrain is a commuter line which runs on the SF Peninsula from San
Francisco south to San Jose, right through rich, high tech Silicon Valley, and on south ~25 miles to Gilroy. It currently uses aging, noisy and polluting diesel engines. Electrification of the line will permit the use of new,
electric Caltrain trains AND allow the California high speed rail trains, which will all be electric, to ALSO run
on the tracks on the peninsula, in a "blended system".
Here is an article re a proposed HSR line in connecting Toronto, Canada with other communities there. Proposed cost is $20 billion, or about a third of California's HSR cost:
https://www.lambtonshield.com/high-speed-rail-benefit-sarnia-says-advocates/
I drove north on 99 the other day going to the Bay Area and the big concrete supports are impressive to see just south of the San Joaquin River where your HSR trains will cross over the UP line east to west in NW
Fresno. The streets in Fresno are so riddled with pot-holes that one cannot even drive around to see the
progress of HSR here without fear of tire damage.
Congratulations on the Caltrain electrification money, even if the money does not come to CHSRA.
Wonderful news. This opens up the possibility of running HSR from San Jose on up to San Francisco, and it
will get those noisy and polluting diesel trains off the peninsula and south down to San Jose. BTW, if they
electrify the route from San Francisco to San Jose, what happens to the Caltrain trains, when they are electric,
from San Jose south to Gilroy?
Here is a good Mercury News article about it. Some interesting comments follow the article: I love how
Fresnans will be able to get to Silicon Valley in an hour on HSR. I can hear my Fresno house increasing in
value already. The mere approval of money for Caltrain electrification should cause homes in Fresno to increase
in value. HSR will now not only run Bakersfield, Hanford, Fresno and Merced to San Jose, it will run from those Central Valley cities to San Francisco.
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/05/22/federal-fta-grant-caltrain-electrification/
BTW, I guess we have to have two sets of trains on the same line on the peninsula- Caltrain electric trains and HSR electric trains. One might be forgiven for wondering why we don't just buy one set of trains. I guess it
is because Caltrain trains stop at a lot of stations on the peninsula and HSR trains will only stop at a couple of
stations- SFO, Redwood City and San Jose (?).
Keep up the great work. I know that your efforts helped bring this about.
My thanks to the Trump Administration for this important investment in transportation in California.
Governor Brown's request for ~$65 billion in federal money to build the California High Speed Rail system is
something which you, President Trump, could and should approve. You would win lots of support in California
if your approved it. As you know, the U.S. provides a free military defense for all of Europe, Japan and Korea. Those countries then spend their defense money on high speed rail- they all have that-, on free universities, on
national health care, and on keeping their industries super-competitive with us. Japan, BTW, has never opened
their auto market to General Motors and the other U.S. auto makers. Mighty fair, right?
Mr. L. William Harding
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/30/2017 7:49 AM
1
Carnahan, David
From:Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>
Sent:Thursday, May 25, 2017 2:15 PM
To:Dan Richard; Daniel Zack; Mayor; CityManager; Council, City; paul.caprioglio;
esmeralda.soria@fresno.gov; kfsndesk; newsdesk; dwalters; rosenheim@kpix.cbs.com;
dennisbalakian; David Balakian; Doug Vagim; Tranil Thomas; lxcastro93@yahoo.com;
Leodies Buchanan; President; firstvp@fresnopoa.org; fmerlo@wildelectric.net;
bretthedrick; robert.andersen; beachrides; bballpod; jboren; bmcewen; Cathy Lewis;
mmt4@pge.com; Mark Kreutzer; Mark Standriff; midge@thebarretts.com;
info@superide1.com; nick yovino; Joel Stiner; scott.mozier; steve.hogg; Steve Wayte;
huidentalsanmateo; boardmembers; Chris Field; Paul Dictos;
diffenbaugh@stanford.edu; Raymond Rivas; Gary Turgeon; jerry ruopoli;
johnhutson580; kclark; leager; mthibodeaux@electriclaboratories.com; popoff;
richard.wenzel; russ@topperjewelers.com; terry; thomas.esqueda@fresno.gov; Jason
Tarvin
Subject:Fwd: Stanford"s Hoover Institution Golden State Poll
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Date: Thu, May 25, 2017 at 1:59 PM
Subject: Stanford"s Hoover Institution Golden State Poll
To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>
Thurs. May 25, 2017
To all- Here is the Hoover Institution Golden State Poll, dated today:
http://www.hoover.org/news/hoover-golden-state-poll-may-2017
One small part: They asked respondents to choose from a dozen infrastructure investments for which they would be willing to see their taxes go up.
Results: Most popular: Better roads and highways (59%).
Repair and maintenance of dams and reservoirs (56%).
Bridge repair (53%).
Building new water storage and transportation (52%).
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/30/2017 7:49 AM
2
Least popular: Electric vehicle charging stations (26%).
Port facility modernization (23%).
The Golden State poll covers many other topics. I recommend it.
L.William Harding
Fresno, Ca.
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/30/2017 7:49 AM
1
Carnahan, David
From:Amy Kacher <amyewardwell@yahoo.com>
Sent:Monday, May 29, 2017 10:19 PM
To:Council, City
Subject:Golf course
Hello counsel members
My two sons 13 & 11 are avid golfers and learned to golf at Palo Alto Muni.
They are thrilled for the course to re‐open. Golf is not the most popular sport for kids these days however, they have
been recruiting friends and introducing them to the game. Having updated facilities will help recruit new players.
I would really like to see a nice clubhouse put in place in time for the grand ‐ reopening. An upgrade to the cafe would
be excellent as well. The stanford golf course has a Coupa Cafe which is wonderful. Would it be possible to get a Coupa
at muni? It would completely update the vibe at the golf course and could quite possibly become a lunch destination for
local workers. Drawing the general public out to the course to experience the beauty and open space would be
enriching for our community.
Thanks for your time.
Amy
Sent from my iPhone
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/30/2017 7:49 AM
1
Carnahan, David
From:Lou Pelosi <lgpelosi@gmail.com>
Sent:Thursday, May 25, 2017 4:06 PM
To:Council, City
Subject:I Support Castilleja
Hello Palo Alto City Council,
I'm writing to express my strong support for Castilleja and its plans to modernize its campus. We have two daughters
and live in a time when the value of diversity and women in society is under siege. Castilleja, the only, non‐sectarian all
girls school on the west coast, plays a critical role in educating the next generation of female leaders. Castilleja's
students, through their community service initiatives, have deep ties to the city's many non‐profit organizations.
Castilleja can trace its history back almost as far as the founding of Palo Alto. Its commitment to excellence mirrors our
community's commitment to education. Please support Castilleja's efforts to stay relevant and provide a meaningful
21st century education to the young women of our city and region.
Thanks,
Lou Pelosi
721 Forest Ave, Palo Alto
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/25/2017 7:18 AM
1
Carnahan, David
From:Palo Alto Free Press <paloaltofreepress@gmail.com>
Sent:Wednesday, May 24, 2017 5:00 PM
To:Stump, Molly
Cc:Scheff, Lisa; Keene, James; Watson, Ron; Perron, Zachary; Council, City; Carnahan, David
Subject:last opportunity
please respond to my CPRA request. I will fly back to Palo Alto if necessary and file a civil complaint. I don't gave a damn
one way or the other...
Mark
Sent from my iPhone
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/30/2017 11:48 AM
1
Carnahan, David
From:Public Records Request Tracking System <public.records.request.tracking@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, May 30, 2017 11:47 AM
To:Stump, Molly
Cc:Council, City; Keene, James
Subject:Police file photos State Bar Complaint / Civil Complaint
We have complied a compelling excel list of rejected CPRA requests by the city of Palo Alto one of which
(listed below) we intend to use and include in our Cal State Bar and civil complaint against you!
Mark Petersen-Perez
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Cullen, Charles <Charles.Cullen@cityofpaloalto.org> wrote: Public Records Act Requestor,
I apologize for the extended time it has taken for the Police Department to respond to your recent Public
Records Act request. Usually we are very diligent in responding within the 10 day period; unfortunately this
request did not receive prompt attention. Public Records requests are routed through the Police Records Unit which is in the Technical Services Division. Ultimately, as the division director, it is my responsibility to ensure we respond in a timely manner, not the person in the department to whom the request was originally
addressed, in this case Lt. Perron.
Government code 3303(e) exempts Lt. Perron’s photo from release without his consent and he has not given that consent. Here is a link to Lt. Perron’s job description:
http://agency.governmentjobs.com/paloaltoca/default.cfm?action=viewclassspec&classSpecID=798932&agenc
y=2138&viewOnly=yes
Lt. Perron is currently assigned to the Investigative Services Division and is in charge of the Department’s Public Information Officers (PIOs).
Please let me know if I can be of further assistance in this matter,
Charles Cullen Technical Services Director
Palo Alto Police Department
275 Forest Ave
Palo Alto, CA 94301 Ph: 650-329-2331
Cell: 650-743-9943
Sent from my iPad
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/30/2017 10:58 AM
1
Carnahan, David
From:Public Records Request Tracking System <public.records.request.tracking@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, May 30, 2017 10:56 AM
To:Carnahan, David
Cc:Watson, Ron; Perron, Zachary; Stump, Molly; Council, City
Subject:Public Records Request - PAPD file photo of Patty Lum
California Public Records Request Act - GOVT. CODE §§ 6250 - 6276.48
Applicable authority: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2373755693531022175&q=Ibarra+v.+Superior+Court+(2013)+217+Cal.App.4th+695&hl=en&as_sdt=2006&as_vis=1
Must be received by: March 9th 2017 - 6255 of the Government code
The agency must provide assistance by helping to identify records and information relevant to the request and
suggesting ways to overcome any practical basis for denying access. (§ 6253.1)
see: Government Code & 6253 re time limits for said disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act.
See: Writings as defined in California Public Records Section 6252(f) and Evidence Code & 250.
If you believe I am not entitled to the requested records I am requesting that you justify your refusal within (ten) days in writing under & 6255 of the Government code. You may only refuse to give me these records if there is an express law prohibiting you from giving them to me.
In the case of California State University of Fresno Assn, Inc. V Superior Court McClatchy Co. (2001) 90 Cal
App.4th 810, the court held that "The burden of proof is on the proponent of nondisclosure, who must demonstrate "clear overbalance" on the side of confidentiality."
Please provide any additional legal authority you would like me to be aware of re this request . Please feel free
to contact me to discuss this request if you have any questions or concerns.
Thank you,
Mark Petersen-Perez
Sent from my iPad
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/30/2017 7:44 AM
1
Carnahan, David
From:Cherrill Spencer <cherrill.m.spencer@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, May 30, 2017 2:28 AM
To:Council, City
Subject:Request regarding the City rejoining the Mayors for Peace
Attachments:MayorsForPeaceRegistration_form_en.doc; ExplanationPageForMfPpetition.doc; MfP
PetitionBlank.doc; LetterToPACityCouncilReMayors ForPeace.doc
To The Palo Alto City Council From Cherrill Spencer
250 Hamilton Ave Los Robles Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301 Palo Alto, CA 94306
REQUEST REGARDING THE CITY RE‐JOINING THE MAYORS FOR PEACE May 29th 2017
The mission of the international organization, Mayors for Peace, is to raise international public awareness
regarding the need to abolish nuclear weapons. I am writing on behalf of the DISARM/Peace Committee of
the Peninsula/Palo Alto branch of the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom and our branch
membership, to urge the Mayor and City Council to re‐join the Mayors for Peace program, to which the city
belonged for 28 years, beginning in 1985, and ending, without public explanation, in 2013 with a withdrawal
letter written by then Mayor Scharff.
The members of Mayors for Peace (MfP) are cities; it was founded in 1982 by the Mayors of Hiroshima and
Nagasaki. Currently there are 7,295 MfP member cities in 162 countries, including 207 cities in the USA, of
which 31 are in California, e.g. Berkeley, Carmel‐by‐the‐Sea, Fairfax, Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento, San
Francisco and Santa Cruz.
It is most likely that Palo Alto and the San Francisco Bay Area are targets for nuclear missiles, ready to be
launched by an unfriendly foreign power. There are over 15,000 nuclear weapons in the world today; about
3,700 of them are deployed, ready to be delivered, by the USA and Russia. Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
(ICBM) can deliver multiple bombs after travelling through the sky for thousands of miles; the latest Russian
“RS‐28” has 40 megatons of bombs in it, enough to wipe out all of northern California with just one ICBM.
Cities and the International Court of Justice utterly reject the right of any nation to obliterate a city for any
purpose whatsoever. MfP is a significant grassroots effort by citizens worldwide to urge governments toward
a nuclear‐weapons‐free world. MfP organizes many activities and works with cities, citizens, Non‐
Governmental‐Organizations (NGO) and other organizations around the world to develop initiatives that
promote the abolition of nuclear weapons.
If the City Council deems nuclear disarmament as an inappropriate topic for city government to be dealing with, I point
out that the U.S. Conference of Mayors has adopted 10 resolutions since 2001 calling for the elimination of nuclear
weapons and redirecting the funds used for them to meet the urgent domestic needs of cities. Why not support the
resolutions of the mayors of the U.S. Conference of Mayors and reinstate Palo Alto's membership in Mayors for Peace so
our city will be supporting its very important work towards the goal of eliminating nuclear weapons? The goal of MfP is
to ensure that no city will ever again be destroyed by a nuclear weapon. I cannot imagine that the City Council could
disagree with this goal and actions of former and current Council members, such as attendance at the September 11th
Community Peace Walk shows that the City Council is supportive of peace issues.
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/30/2017 7:44 AM
2
The Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) is an NGO that has been working for disarmament
and against war for 102 years. Our local branch is now 95 years old and we were proud recipients of a proclamation
honoring our activities “… for worldwide disarmament and peaceful resolution of international conflicts” signed
by Mayor Karen Holman on behalf of the Palo Alto City Council, in celebration of WILPF's 100th anniversary, naming
November 11th 2015 as "Women's International League for Peace and Freedom Day".
Our WILPF branch is currently working on educating the public about the United Nations Treaty to Prohibit Nuclear
Weapons. The first draft of this most important treaty was released in Geneva, Switzerland, on 22 May, 2017. The draft
was developed on the basis of discussions and input received during the first round of negotiations, with the
participation of 132 nations, held at the UN headquarters in New York from 27 to 31 March 2017. The negotiations will
resume on 15 June and continue until 7 July, with the draft as the basis. The world has already banned biological
weapons (1972), chemical weapons (1993), land mines (1997) and cluster munitions (2008). Now we must get rid of the
worst weapons of all, before we accidently blunder into a nuclear war, which might happen according to experts such as
the US Secretary of Defense (1994‐97) and Palo Alto resident, William Perry, who describes the past and potential
horrors of nuclear bombs in his 2015 autobiographical book “My Journey at the Nuclear Brink”.
The power of Mayors for Peace lies in its large membership; Palo Alto is the leader in so many fronts, let us not be
“missing in action” when MfP urges the United Nations to pass this treaty that makes nuclear weapons illegal in a few
weeks time. It was while working on our nuclear disarmament projects that our Peninsula/Palo Alto WILPF branch
learned that the City of Palo Alto had resigned from Mayors for Peace in April 2013, without any public consultation, and
with no explanation given when the Peninsula Peace and Justice Center requested one in July 2013. We were very
concerned to learn about this resignation and resolved to persuade the City Council that our city, which has several
prominent and active peace organizations besides WILPF, should re‐join it.
In order to ascertain if other residents of Palo Alto thought it should re‐join MfP we created a simple petition and
showed it to a sample of Palo Alto residents over a short time period. 100% of the people who we approached and who
read our explanation (attached to this email) signed the petition without hesitation. Most were amazed Palo Alto had
ever left Mayors for Peace and encouraged us to present our petition to you, which is the purpose of this letter.
Action Petitioned For: We the undersigned are concerned residents of Palo Alto who urge our
leaders to act now to have Palo Alto re‐join the Mayors for Peace organization and pay its
annual fee of 2000 yen (~$20).
I will deliver to the City Clerks Office the 15 sheets of petition signatures, containing signatures, printed names
and street addresses of 112 Palo Alto residents. I will not send them by email because I suppose those 112
residents do not want their names and full addresses to be published on the web in your public records.
We suppose that a simple vote of the City Council to re‐join Mayors for Peace is the process you need to follow to
indicate the City’s desire to re‐join. We would appreciate this topic of the City’s participation in MfP being added to a
Council meeting agenda before you take your Summer break. How to reach MfP to ask to rejoin is described on this
webpage: http://www.mayorsforpeace.org/english/outlines/join.html and I have attached their registration form.
This webpage describes the various methods for paying the annual membership fee of 2,000 Japanese yen:
http://www.mayorsforpeace.org/english/outlines/membership_fee.html . Once Palo Alto has become a
member city you will receive a login ID and password for the Mayors for Peace Information System. Then City
staff can pay the nominal fee using their online system with a credit card, this payment method will incur no
bank fees.
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/30/2017 7:44 AM
3
Both WILPF and Mayors for Peace understand that just eliminating nuclear weapons will not bring about a
lasting world peace and so both organizations also work on eliminating poverty and homelessness, supporting
human rights, protecting the environment, and improving the status of women, all of which will help make
cities inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable, as I am sure the Palo Alto City Council wishes Palo Alto to be.
Please contact me through my email address if you have any questions about the Mayors for Peace. Our
Peninsula/Palo Alto WILPF branch and the Peninsula Peace and Justice Center stand ready to assist the City
Council through the process of re‐joining Mayors for Peace.
Yours sincerely
Cherrill Spencer, Palo Alto resident since 1974
WILPF member
***** Website addresses for the organizations mentioned in this letter ***
National WILPF: www.wilpfus.org ; International WILPF: www.wilpf.org ; Mayors for Peace:
www.mayorsforpeace.org ;
U.S. Conference of Mayors: http://usmayors.org/resolutions/ ; Peninsula Peace and Justice Center:
www.peaceandjustice.org ;
Information on the UN Treaty to Prohibit Nuclear Weapons can be found at http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/
***
This email is repeated in the attached WORD file called "LetterToPACityCouncilReMayorsForPeace.doc" .
Registration Form
To Mr. MATSUI Kazumi
Mayor of Hiroshima
President of Mayors for Peace
I hereby express my city/municipality’s support for the abolition of nuclear weapons and desire to join the
Mayors for Peace.*
Name of your country:
Name of your city/municipality:
Mayor’s name: Gender:□Male □Female
Address:
TEL: FAX:
E-mail:
Contact person
Name: Gender:□Male □Female
Position:
E-mail:
Website:
Population:
Date:
Mayor’s Signature:
*This registration form is to express your city/municipality’s decision to join Mayors for Peace. If your
city/municipality requires specific procedures, including approval from your city/municipal council, please
submit this form after such procedures are completed.
Mayors for Peace
Please send this form to: Mayors for Peace Secretariat FAX：+81-82-242-7452 E-mail：mayorcon@pcf.city.hiroshima.jp
WHAT IS “MAYORS FOR PEACE” and WHY SHOULD PALO ALTO JOIN IT?
Mission of Mayors for Peace: The international organization called Mayors for Peace, through
close cooperation among the cities which belong to it, strives to raise international public
awareness regarding the need to abolish nuclear weapons and it also contributes to the realization of
genuine and lasting world peace by working to eliminate starvation and poverty, assist refugees fleeing local conflict,
support human rights, protect the environment, and solve the other problems that threaten peaceful coexistence within
the human family.
Mayors for Peace (MfP) was formed in 1982 after the mayors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
appeared at the 2nd UN Special Session on Disarmament and called for cities to come together
in solidarity for peace and, specifically, for the abolition of nuclear weapons.
Currently MfP has 7,247 member cities in 162 countries, including 207 U.S. cities, of which 31 are in California
e.g. Berkeley, San Francisco, Richmond, Sacramento, Santa Cruz, Santa Barbara, Fairfax, Irvine, Los Angeles,
Carmel-by-the-Sea, Oakland, to name some. BUT PALO ALTO IS NOT A MEMBER OF MAYORS FOR PEACE.
IT IS MOST LIKELY THAT PALO ALTO & THE BAY AREA ARE TARGETS FOR
NUCLEAR MISSILES READY TO BE LAUNCHED BY A FOREIGN POWER
There are about 3,700 nuclear weapons deployed in the USA and Russia. Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
(ICBM) can deliver multiple bombs after travelling through the sky for thousands of miles; the latest Russian
“RS-28” has 40Megatons of bombs in it: enough to wipe out all of northern California with just one missile.
Cities and the International Court of Justice utterly reject the right of any nation to obliterate a
city for any purpose whatsoever. MfP is a significant grassroots effort by citizens worldwide to
urge governments toward a nuclear-weapons-free world. Here is its website: www.mayorsforpeace.org
In 2013, according to the membership department of MfP, then Mayor of Palo Alto, Greg
Scharff wrote to the organization to withdraw Palo Alto’s membership; we had been members
since 1985, soon after the organization was founded in 1982. We cannot find out why the City
Council and the Mayor withdrew from MfP. But it could not have been cost, yearly membership of MfP
is 2000 Japanese yen, which is about twenty dollars (US$20).
The power of Mayors for Peace lies in its large membership; Palo Alto should be counted
amongst the thousands of cities who already belong so we will be heard when MfP urges the
United Nations to pass a treaty that bans nuclear weapons. The aim is to ensure that no city
will ever again be destroyed by a nuclear weapon.
We petition the Palo Alto City Council to rejoin the Mayors for Peace as soon as possible.
PLEASE SIGN THE ATTACHED PETITION (ONLY PALO ALTO RESIDENTS SHOULD SIGN, NO NEED
TO BE A US CITIZEN) AND THE PENINSULA/PALO ALTO BRANCH OF THE WOMEN’S
INTERNATIONAL LEAGUE FOR PEACE AND FREEDOM WILL PRESENT OUR SIGNATURES TO THE
PALO ALTO CITY COUNCIL AND REQUEST THAT THEY REJOIN MAYORS FOR PEACE.
Petition from Palo Alto residents to the Palo Alto City Council
Action Petitioned For: We, the undersigned, are concerned residents of Palo Alto who urge our leaders to act now to have
Palo Alto re-join the Mayors for Peace organization and pay its annual fee of 2000 yen (~$20).
Petition organized by the Peninsula/Palo Alto Women’s League for Peace and Freedom, wilpfus.org.
More information: wilpf.peninsula.paloalto@gmail.com and https://www.facebook.com/PPAWILPF
Date Signature Printed Name Street Address in Palo Alto Comment
To The Palo Alto City Council From Cherrill Spencer
250 Hamilton Ave Los Robles Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301 Palo Alto, CA 94306
REQUEST REGARDING THE CITY RE-JOINING THE MAYORS FOR PEACE May 29th 2017
The mission of the international organization, Mayors for Peace, is to raise international public awareness regarding the
need to abolish nuclear weapons. I am writing on behalf of the DISARM/Peace Committee of the Peninsula/Palo Alto
branch of the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom and our branch membership, to urge the Mayor
and City Council to re-join the Mayors for Peace program, to which the city belonged for 28 years, beginning in 1985,
and ending, without public explanation, in 2013 with a withdrawal letter written by then Mayor Scharff.
The members of Mayors for Peace (MfP) are cities; it was founded in 1982 by the Mayors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Currently there are 7,295 MfP member cities in 162 countries, including 207 cities in the USA, of which 31 are in
California, e.g. Berkeley, Carmel-by-the-Sea, Fairfax, Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento, San Francisco and Santa Cruz.
It is most likely that Palo Alto and the San Francisco Bay Area are targets for nuclear missiles, ready to be launched by an
unfriendly foreign power. There are over 15,000 nuclear weapons in the world today; about 3,700 of them are deployed,
ready to be delivered, by the USA and Russia. Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBM) can deliver multiple bombs after
travelling through the sky for thousands of miles; the latest Russian “RS-28” has 40 megatons of bombs in it, enough to
wipe out all of northern California with just one ICBM.
Cities and the International Court of Justice utterly reject the right of any nation to obliterate a city for any purpose
whatsoever. MfP is a significant grassroots effort by citizens worldwide to urge governments toward a nuclear-weapons-
free world. MfP organizes many activities and works with cities, citizens, Non-Governmental-Organizations (NGO) and
other organizations around the world to develop initiatives that promote the abolition of nuclear weapons.
If the City Council deems nuclear disarmament as an inappropriate topic for city government to be dealing with, I point
out that the U.S. Conference of Mayors has adopted 10 resolutions since 2001 calling for the elimination of nuclear
weapons and redirecting the funds used for them to meet the urgent domestic needs of cities. Why not support the
resolutions of the mayors of the U.S. Conference of Mayors and reinstate Palo Alto's membership in Mayors for Peace so
our city will be supporting its very important work towards the goal of eliminating nuclear weapons? The goal of MfP is
to ensure that no city will ever again be destroyed by a nuclear weapon. I cannot imagine that the City Council could
disagree with this goal and actions of former and current Council members, such as attendance at the September 11th
Community Peace Walk shows that the City Council is supportive of peace issues.
The Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) is an NGO that has been working for disarmament
and against war for 102 years. Our local branch is now 95 years old and we were proud recipients of a proclamation
honoring our activities “… for worldwide disarmament and peaceful resolution of international conflicts” signed
by Mayor Karen Holman on behalf of the Palo Alto City Council, in celebration of WILPF's 100th anniversary, naming
November 11th 2015 as "Women's International League for Peace and Freedom Day".
Our WILPF branch is currently working on educating the public about the United Nations Treaty to Prohibit Nuclear
Weapons. The first draft of this most important treaty was released in Geneva, Switzerland, on 22 May, 2017. The draft
was developed on the basis of discussions and input received during the first round of negotiations, with the
participation of 132 nations, held at the UN headquarters in New York from 27 to 31 March 2017. The negotiations will
resume on 15 June and continue until 7 July, with the draft as the basis. The world has already banned biological
weapons (1972), chemical weapons (1993), land mines (1997) and cluster munitions (2008). Now we must get rid of the
worst weapons of all, before we accidently blunder into a nuclear war, which might happen according to experts such as
the US Secretary of Defense (1994-97) and Palo Alto resident, William Perry, who describes the past and potential
horrors of nuclear bombs in his 2015 autobiographical book “My Journey at the Nuclear Brink”.
The power of Mayors for Peace lies in its large membership; Palo Alto is the leader in so many fronts, let us not be
“missing in action” when MfP urges the United Nations to pass this treaty that makes nuclear weapons illegal in a few
weeks time. It was while working on our nuclear disarmament projects that our Peninsula/Palo Alto WILPF branch
learned that the City of Palo Alto had resigned from Mayors for Peace in April 2013, without any public consultation, and
with no explanation given when the Peninsula Peace and Justice Center requested one in July 2013. We were very
concerned to learn about this resignation and resolved to persuade the City Council that our city, which has several
prominent and active peace organizations besides WILPF, should re-join it.
In order to ascertain if other residents of Palo Alto thought it should re-join MfP we created a simple petition and
showed it to a sample of Palo Alto residents over a short time period. 100% of the people who we approached and who
read our explanation (attached to this email) signed the petition without hesitation. Most were amazed Palo Alto had
ever left Mayors for Peace and encouraged us to present our petition to you, which is the purpose of this letter.
Action Petitioned For: We the undersigned are concerned residents of Palo Alto who urge our
leaders to act now to have Palo Alto re-join the Mayors for Peace organization and pay its
annual fee of 2000 yen (~$20).
I will deliver to the City Clerks Office the 15 sheets of petition signatures, containing signatures, printed names
and street addresses of 112 Palo Alto residents. I will not send them by email because I suppose those 112
residents do not want their names and full addresses to be published on the web in your public records.
We suppose that a simple vote of the City Council to re-join Mayors for Peace is the process you need to follow to
indicate the City’s desire to re-join. We would appreciate this topic of the City’s participation in MfP being added to a
Council meeting agenda before you take your Summer break. How to reach MfP to ask to rejoin is described on this
webpage: http://www.mayorsforpeace.org/english/outlines/join.html and I have attached their registration form.
This webpage describes the various methods for paying the annual membership fee of 2,000 Japanese yen:
http://www.mayorsforpeace.org/english/outlines/membership_fee.html . Once Palo Alto has become a member city
you will receive a login ID and password for the Mayors for Peace Information System. Then City staff can pay the
nominal fee using their online system with a credit card, this payment method will incur no bank fees.
Both WILPF and Mayors for Peace understand that just eliminating nuclear weapons will not bring about a lasting world
peace and so both organizations also work on eliminating poverty and homelessness, supporting human rights,
protecting the environment, and improving the status of women, all of which will help make cities inclusive, safe,
resilient and sustainable, as I am sure the Palo Alto City Council wishes Palo Alto to be.
Please contact me through my email address if you have any questions about the Mayors for Peace. Our
Peninsula/Palo Alto WILPF branch and the Peninsula Peace and Justice Center stand ready to assist the City
Council through the process of re-joining Mayors for Peace.
Yours sincerely
Cherrill Spencer, Palo Alto resident since 1974
WILPF member
***** Website addresses for the organizations mentioned in this letter ***
National WILPF: www.wilpfus.org ; International WILPF: www.wilpf.org ; Mayors for Peace: www.mayorsforpeace.org ;
U.S. Conference of Mayors: http://usmayors.org/resolutions/ ; Peninsula Peace and Justice Center:
www.peaceandjustice.org ;
Information on the UN Treaty to Prohibit Nuclear Weapons can be found at http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/30/2017 1:05 PM
1
Carnahan, David
From:Gail Price <gail.price3@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, May 30, 2017 12:53 PM
To:Council, City
Subject:Seeking Nominations for the 2017 Kiwanis Angel Award
Attachments:NominationForm2017 copy.pdf
Dear Mayor Scharff and Palo Alto City Council members,
As you are well aware, the Kiwanis Club of Palo Alto is seeking nominations for the 2017 Angel Award. The honoree is
selection based upon their significant contributions toward the positive impact on children and youth in our community.
The deadline for submittal of the nomination is Friday, June 2, 2017.
I have included a nomination form for your review and use. Thank you.
Gail Price
6th Annual
Kiwanis Club of Palo Alto
Angel Award
Investing in Our Children
Nomination Form
Nomination Deadline: Noon, Friday, June 2, 2017
The Kiwanis Club of Palo Alto is proud to announce the 6th Annual Kiwanis Angel Award will be
presented October 19, 2017. The Club requests your help in nominating a potential Kiwanis Angel
Award honoree.
Your nomination will assist us in recognizing and acknowledging those who work with exceptional
dedication to make our community the wonderful collection of people it has become.
The honoree will be selected based on his/her efforts that have made a significant positive impact
on youth and children. While residency in Palo Alto is not a requirement, the recipient will be an
individual from the greater Palo Alto area. The honoree’s extraordinary service to children may be
in the local area or beyond.
Nominee: _______________________________________________________________________________
Primary Project / Organization through which the nominee’s service is provided:
_________________________________________________________________________________________
The nomination should include:
1. A letter explaining the reasons for nomination (one page maximum)
2. Two additional letters of support (not to exceed one page each)
3. Supplementary material (three pages maximum – not required)
Your Name: ______________________________________________________________________________
Phone: ______________________________ Email: ____________________________________________
Nomination must be submitted by
Noon, Friday, June 2, 2017
For more information: Gail Price:
650.814.3308
June Klein: 650.856.2435
june@kleinnet.com
KiwanisAngelAward.org
Palo Alto
Kiwanis Club of Palo Alto
P. O. Box 149
Palo Alto, CA 94302
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/30/2017 9:43 AM
1
Carnahan, David
From:Xenia Hammer <xhammer@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:34 AM
To:City Mgr; Council, City; Scharff, Gregory (internal)
Subject:Support for Castilleja
Dear City Manager, Mayor Scharff and Members of City Council,
I am writing to express strong support for Castilleja School and its plans to modernize its campus. Castilleja School has been a part of Palo Alto community for over a century and fulfills a wonderful mission of educating girls. It is an incredible resource that makes Palo Alto a better place.
Castilleja’s most recent proposal, submitted April 2017, reflects a genuine effort to be responsive to the
concerns of the neighborhood and create an attractive campus that blends in with its surroundings. For example, underground garage will significantly reduce demand for surface parking.
I am writing this letter both as a resident of Palo Alto and a teacher at Castilleja. As a Castilleja employee, I
can attest to the extensive, ongoing and effective measures that the school follows to minimize traffic and
parking around campus. There is ongoing and active encouragement to carpool, walk, bike and use public transportation. With these efforts, proposed increases in enrollment (of under 25%) can be achieved without
increasing traffic.
Some of the neighborhood concerns directed at Castilleja are due to overall growth in traffic and development
in the area, driven by Stanford, Town & Country Shopping Center, nearby Palo Alto High School and businesses downtown.
It would be a devastating loss for the community if Castilleja were to leave Palo Alto. Please note that Palo
Alto High School has exceeded its enrollment cap for next year, highlighting the importance of education
options in our community.
Castilleja’s proposed enrollment increase of under 25% is modest, reasonable and necessary. It can be
accomplished without increasing traffic burdens for the neighborhood. It is also necessary for the school's
mission of educating women leaders and will open wonderful opportunities for deserving young women from a
variety of socio-economic backgrounds.
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/30/2017 9:43 AM
2
I urge you to support Castilleja’s proposal to modernize its campus.
Thank you,
Xenia Hammer
861 Sharon Ct.
Palo Alto, CA 94301
City of Palo Alto | City Clerk's Office | 5/30/2017 8:09 AM
1
Carnahan, David
From:Palo Alto Free Press <paloaltofreepress@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, May 30, 2017 7:52 AM
To:michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com; Stump, Molly; Wagner, April; Ryan, Dan;
DOkonkwo@da.sccgov.org; Brian Welch; Philip, Brian; Watson, Ron; Perron, Zachary;
Council, City; Jay Boyarsky; jrosen@da.sccgov.org; Keene, James
Subject:The alleged rapist
this report has still not been fixed.... the complaint spoke no english. how could she request a civil standby? unless she was coached by April Wagner or Dan Ryan or some other PAPD staff member OR perhaps
even the DA's involvement... THE FACT REMAINS I, I filed the civil standby Assholes....
Mark
http://cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/12663
Sent from my iPhone
CITY OF PALO ALTO. CA
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
17 HAY 26 PH 2: 32
mJ i ~ Z-/?/l
)}-e,Af ~ec 'L fit-
£«~--'2-~ ~
~~H
an~ /C°'/?
~ £c/
21/(2-/O~
f\ltD ad-; 'o-x LJ ~
~'~ ~.A:c=r -
Z£ :Z Md 9Z AVW LI
3:J1~uo s.~H31J All:J
V:J '011'1 OlVd :JO J..ll:J