HomeMy Public PortalAbout06.16.2021 Park Commission Meeting Packet Posted 6/11/2021 Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
MEDINA PARK COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, June 16, 2021 7:00 P.M.
Meeting to be held telephonically
pursuant Minn. Stat. Sec. 13D.021
1) Call to Order
2) Additions to Agenda
3) Approval of the Minutes from:
May 19, 2021 Regular Meeting
4) Public Comments (on items not on the agenda)
5) City Council Update
6) 2022-2026 Capital Improvement Plan – Park Funding Discussion
7) Plan Park Tour
8) Staff Report
a) Diamond Lake Regional Trail Master Plan - Recap
b) General Items
9) Adjourn
Telephonic Meeting
Call-in Instructions
Dial 1-612-517-3122
Enter Conference ID: 867 759 269#
1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Medina Park Commission
FROM: Jodi Gallup, Assistant City Administrator
DATE OF REPORT: June 11, 2021
DATE OF MEETING: June 16, 2021
SUBJECT: Park Commission Meeting Report
2. Additions to Agenda
If any Park Commissioner wishes to add an item to the agenda after the agenda has
already been posted, the agenda item must be proposed at this point in the meeting. The
Park Commission must agree to add the item by motion.
No attachments for this item.
5. City Council Update
This is a reoccurring agenda item to have the City Council Liaison to the Park
Commission give an update at each meeting on what is happening at the Council level.
City Council member Joseph Cavanaugh has been appointed as the Liaison to the Park
Commission for 2021.
No attachments for this item.
6. 2022-2026 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) – Park Funding Discussion
This agenda item will be to start reviewing Medina’s Capital Improvement plan for future
park and trail planning. I will give a short presentation on park funding and Medina’s
existing park asset inventory. Please also take some time to review goals and be thinking
ahead for future goals up to five years out. We will finalize the 2022-2026 CIP at the July
21st meeting.
See attached memo, Draft CIP, goals, and asset inventory.
Recommended Action: No required action at this meeting.
7. Plan Park Tour
Please come to the meeting prepared to discuss your assigned parks. This will help us
establish the most important parks to visit at our Park Tour on June 30th.
No attachments for this item.
Recommended Action: Make recommendations on park tour stops. Call for meeting on
June 30, 2021 beginning at 4:30 p.m. for the Annual Park Tour.
8. Staff Report
a. Diamond Lake Regional Trail Master Plan – Recap. The City Council reviewed this item
at their June 1st meeting, but had asked staff for follow-up information before deciding to
take action. This item will be on the June 15th City Council agenda for potential action.
Attached is the staff report that was submitted to the City Council for the June 15th
2
meeting. Staff will provide an updated to the Park Commission on any action taken by
the City Council and next steps.
b. General Items. This agenda item is to give a verbal update on any other general park
items.
Staff representation at the June 16th Park Commission meeting will be Assistant City
Administrator Jodi Gallup and Public Works Director Steve Scherer.
Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
May 19, 2021
Page 1 of 10
The Park Commission of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on May 19, 2021 at 7:00
p.m., which was held virtually pursuant Minn. Stat. Sec. 13D.021. Park Commission Chair John
Jacob presided.
1) Call to Order
Commissioners Present: Mary Morrison, John Jacob, Angela Bernhardt, Nila
Norman, Steve Lee, Terry Sharp, Troy Hutchinson
Youth Members Present: Emily Jans and Katya Cavanaugh
Commissioners Absent: None
Also Present: Public Works Director Steve Scherer, Assistant City
Administrator Jodi Gallup, Planning Director Dusty Finke,
Councilmember Joe Cavanaugh
2) Additions to the Agenda: None.
3) Approval of the Minutes from:
• March 17, 2021 Meeting: No changes.
A motion was made by Sharp and seconded by Morrison to approve the minutes from
March 17, 2021 as presented.
A roll call vote was taken:
Lee aye
Sharp aye
Bernhardt aye
Norman aye
Hutchinson aye
Morrison aye
Jacob aye
Motion passed unanimously.
4) Public Comments (on items not on the agenda): None.
5) City Council Update
Cavanaugh provided an update on recent City Council actions.
Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
May 19, 2021
Page 2 of 10
6) Diamond Lake Regional Trail Master Plan
Finke stated that tonight the Commission will review a potential route through Medina for
the Diamond Lake Regional Trail (DLRT). He reviewed background information on the
DLRT and the engagement that has occurred over the past year as part of the Master Plan
process. He noted that the Park Commission and City Council did not support the route
proposed through the southern portion of Medina and requested engagement on an alternative
route that would connect the DLRT to Baker Park. He noted that the Council has stated that
they would not support the use of eminent domain and trail corridor acquisition would need
to occur with willing sellers or through park dedication over time. He provided details on the
two options that would connect from the northern city boundary to Hamel Road and noted
that a summary of the reports from the engagement completed was included in the
Commission packet for review. He stated that the intent tonight is to gain a recommendation
from the Commission and present that to the Council at its June 1st meeting. He noted that
Three Rivers Park District intends to move forward on its DLRT planning process, either
with a recommended route through Medina or by working with neighboring communities and
bypassing Medina. He introduced the members of the Three Rivers Park District team
present at the meeting tonight.
Stephen Shurson, Three Rivers Park District Project Manager, displayed a map showing two
trail options coming from Corcoran and through the northern portion of Medina, connecting
to Baker Park, into Orono, continuing through Long Lake, and connecting through Wayzata.
Stewart Crosby, SRF, reviewed the existing condition of Hamel Road and noted that the
preferred trail option would be to have a back of curb trail which would remain within the
right-of-way. He stated that in situations where the ditch is steep, there are wetlands or other
challenges, the trail could be placed on the outside of the ditch. He stated that sometimes in
those instances a permanent easement could be needed. He stated that Hamel Road provides
a lot of opportunities but also has challenges. He provided additional details on the different
route options, challenges, and design elements that would come along with those routes.
Shurson stated that the public engagement process ran a course of about seven weeks and
reviewed the different methods that were utilized in attempt to solicit the most input from the
public. He stated that there were two in person open house sessions at Fields of Medina Park
and Baker Park along with three virtual meetings. He provided details on the input received
through the interactive map option, noting that there was generally more support for the route
north of Highway 55 and more opposition as it moved along Hamel Road. He stated that for
those opposed to the trail, the majority of the concern centered on a concern with a loss of
privacy and perceived loss of security. He stated that for those that supported the trail, the
main theme related to connectivity and the opportunity to have a safe crossing of Highway
55. He noted that engagement support was evenly split between the two routes. He
summarized that the majority of Hamel Road property owners were opposed to the trail while
those that lived further from Hamel Road were very supportive because they desire that
connectivity. He noted that the decision would be of the City as to whether it wants to move
forward with the project. He stated that if Medina does not want to move forward, Three
Rivers Park District will continue to move forward, working with other communities.
Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
May 19, 2021
Page 3 of 10
Jacob thanked the members present from Three Rivers Park District, Finke and the members
of the public that have been involved in the engagement throughout this process. He stated
that the Commission has been provided with copies of all the comments received thus far and
therefore those comments do not need to be repeated tonight. He welcomed any additional
comments that residents may have tonight.
Doug Dunlay, 4292 Arrowhead Drive, thanked the City and Park District for engaging the
public and providing the opportunity for input. He stated that currently there are two options
proposed, noting that the eastern route would impact his property along with many of his
neighbors. He stated that the route comes through his yard, clips his garage, and comes
down his driveway which would be a huge impact. He asked that the Commission not
support that route. He stated that if the eastern route is chosen, that should run along
Meander Road rather than crossing private property and impacting wetlands. He stated that
he is not against a bike path but believed the least impactful route to landowners, privacy and
the wetlands should be found at the most economical and feasible manner.
Finke commented that the long-range planning of the project was discussed and in areas of
the city that have been identified for future development, exact routes were not necessarily
identified but rather general location which could be worked into future potential
development. He noted that in those instances the trail would be part of a subdivision request
and received through park dedication.
Chris Blattner, 3085 Hamel Road, commented that he has a huge concern with the posted
graphic related to the number of people that supported and opposed the trail. He stated that
there were probably a lot of votes from individuals that live within a subdivision and do not
have direct impacts. He explained that he, and many of his neighbors, purchased their land
because of their desire for privacy and have concern with a trail running through the area.
Dan Strand, 1985 Hamel Road, stated that he has many concerns. He stated that at the March
17th meeting there was a statement made that the route to the west was slightly different than
the original western route and asked the reason that route was changed. He stated that it was
mentioned that Cavanaugh requested that change and asked which properties were involved.
Shurson commented that he believed the change was made around the Tamarack Drive area
in order to better align with the planned City streets north of Highway 55. He stated that the
lines should be considered conceptual and flexible as there is the potential for future
development which would provide opportunity to obtain trails. He stated that they also
eliminated the route along 116.
Finke stated that early on in the process there were three potential crossings of Highway 55
and as the process moved forward the potential Arrowhead crossing was moved further west
because of the topography of the location.
Strand stated that there has been a lot of work put into this process but there is a horse trail
down Hamel Road for community use. He asked where the drainage from the trail would be
Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
May 19, 2021
Page 4 of 10
routed. He referenced the cost for the trail and asked where the funds would come from to
construct the trail. He noted that an overpass is expense as are impacts to wetlands. He
recognized the anticipated schedule to move forward to the Council in June but believed that
is premature. He stated that he does not support a trail that would come through this
property. He asked how many members of the city would use the trail versus those from
outside Medina.
Mark Lamberty, 4250 Arrowhead Drive, stated that the eastern route would directly impact
their property. He stated that there is already a bike path on their property. He asked why
Meander Road to Arrowhead Drive would not be considered as a viable option rather than
crossing private properties and wetlands. He stated that the property owners have expressed
opposition and therefore was unsure how this could be a viable route when there are not
willing sellers.
Tracey Lamberty commented that there are bikers using the roadway/path every day and
evening. She asked why those bikers would not continue to be served with a path that would
provide safety to both the bikers and drivers.
Mr. Blattner commented that he did not believe the bikers would use the trails as they
continue to use the roadways even when there are trails available.
Mr. Lamberty asked and received confirmation that the emails he submitted were included
and distributed to the members of the Commission. He stated that there is a park at the end
of the road that they have allowed the City to access through their property for maintenance,
even though it is a no maintenance park. He stated that he would have no desire to continue
to allow that access if this route is approved.
Lee stated if the City were to approve the trail corridor, could it then find itself in a situation
where the park district decided to move the corridor outside of Medina because of the
challenges that exist on the routes.
Shurson stated that if Medina approves a route, the park district would be committed to it and
would not come back at a future date stating it is not feasible. He stated that they understand
there are challenges, but those challenges are not insurmountable.
Lee stated that he agrees with the concept that existing trails and pathways should be used
where they already exist rather than going through private property. He stated that for a long
time the City has tried to find a way to connect both north and south and east and west
through more than just driving and it has been a struggle. He stated that conceptually
everyone supports the concept but when it comes close to someone’s home their opinion is
changed. He commented that the park district is willing to help the City build a trail and a
safe crossing to get over Highway 55. He stated that if the City chooses not to move
forward, it will miss the opportunity to connect the north and south and east to west and that
would be a terrible missed opportunity. He noted that cost would then fall solely to the
residents of Medina in the future. He commented that the residents in the north have felt
somewhat isolated and therefore he is attempting to best solve that dilemma.
Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
May 19, 2021
Page 5 of 10
Sharp stated that one role of the Commission is to make trails and parks accessible to all
residents of Medina. He stated that it is tough to meet the wants and needs of all and he
greatly respects the residents along Hamel Road. He commented that there will be a lost
opportunity for the City and future generations of residents if Three Rivers chooses to bypass
Medina. He stated that people come to Minnesota because of the parks and trails, both
neighborhood and regional, and if those are not accessible that is a lost opportunity.
Bernhardt stated that she has appreciated the openness and number of meetings to allow
public input. She stated that she is ready to make a decision but is not sure it fits with the
comments of the previous two Commission members.
Norman stated that she has found it interesting and fun to see the members of the public
participate throughout the engagement process. She stated that the role of the Commission is
to think about both the present and future residents of the community. She stated that 30
years from now she cannot predict what the landscape will look like but is certain it will
involve people wanting to be outside and enjoying the environment. She stated that she
agrees more with the previous Commission member in the overall sentiment and commented
that she is heavily weighing the disruption that would be caused to those along Hamel Road.
Hutchinson stated that he has lived in Medina for over 12 years on Lake Independence,
therefore he is not unfamiliar with all that comes with having property that abuts public
space. He stated that as a lakeshore property owner, the lake is shared with those from the
public that use the lake in both the summer and winter months. He stated that they have
consistently seen through the different proposals that those that live along the search
corridors provide the feedback and express that they do not want something in their
backyard. He noted that is a common theme with development and other public projects. He
stated that part of the draw in moving to Medina was the proximity of the neighborhood to
the trail system and Baker Park. He stated that is something that should be highly valued and
treasured by the community. He stated that Three Rivers Park District has skilled staff
members with a tremendous amount of past experience and education and are objective in
how they look at this. He explained that the desire is to build public trails that are accessible
to all for the public good. He stated that he places value on the suggestions, studies, and
proposals from the Park District. He stated that he does support the work that has been done
by the Park District and supports the proposal.
Morrison stated that she is strongly opposed to placing the trail down Hamel Road as she
does not see why that route is more suitable than others that were eliminated (Tamarack and
Hunter). She stated that Hamel Road is narrow with bad sightlines and the trail impedes the
rural properties on which it would run adjacent. She stated that she senses that the desire is
for the crossing over Highway 55 and believed there is a solution that can provide that
without impeding Hamel Road. She noted that the timeline has been stated as 20 to 30 years
and did not believe Medina could wait that long to obtain the safe crossing for Highway 55
and therefore this would not provide a solution for the connection issue Medina already has.
She did not believe that it would make sense that Hamel Road would become the sacrificial
neighborhood because everyone else has already objected. She believed that the City is
Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
May 19, 2021
Page 6 of 10
chasing the money opportunity without supporting what is ultimately best for Medina and its
residents and therefore would not support this moving forward.
Jans commented that she appreciates the opportunity to provide feedback. She stated that she
agrees that this trail would be an opportunity and asset to future generations and would allow
more people to enjoy the rural character of Medina. She asked how the environmental
concerns would differ between the two routes and how impacts to the environment would be
mitigated.
Shurson commented that he believed there were more wetlands to be crossed on the west
option compared to the east. He explained that they build boardwalks elevated above the
surface of wetlands which still allows for vegetation to grow and animal life to pass under the
boardwalks. He stated that boardwalks are also constructed in the winter in order to
minimize disruption. He noted that they would also work with the local Watershed District
to ensure the proper methods are followed.
Crosby commented that the western route has roughly 1,100 feet of linear wetland while the
eastern route has upwards of 1,600 linear feet, which would place the eastern route as the
route with more wetland area.
Cavanaugh commented that she would support a trail going through that area because it
would be great to share the natural beauty of Medina with residents and others. She stated
that it would also be great to have a safe pedestrian crossing over Highway 55.
Jacob commented that this project and undertaking has exposed a lot of interesting
challenges and the differences in opinion between the residents in the north and south and
whether residents would be directly impacted by the trail. He stated that it is important to
preserve the rural character of Medina as that is the reason most residents moved to Medina.
He thanked Three Rivers Park District and its planning team for the work and effort that has
gone into this. He recognized that there are a lot of details that would be involved in making
the project a success but there does not seem to be a large amount of support for this and
therefore he would not be supporting this trail. He recognized that the ultimate decision
would be of the City Council.
Lee thanked everyone that has provided comments and questions throughout this process,
recognizing the time that everyone has put into this consideration. He asked if Medina were
to move forward, would this be a timeline of 20 to 30 years.
Kelly Grissman, Three Rivers Park District, commented that the trails proposed from Hamel
Road north would fall under a sooner timeframe. She stated that the Park District looks for
any opportunity to coordinate with other projects and willing sellers. She stated that once
property becomes available, they work to secure that. She believed there is more opportunity
to do that in the northern portion of Medina where properties will be developing, and roads
are still be configured. She stated that getting an overpass over Highway 55 would be a
challenge but beginning those conversations sooner would help to make it a more successful
project. She stated that as Medina continues to develop, it would make for a more
Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
May 19, 2021
Page 7 of 10
competitive and easily fundable project. She commented that work could happen in the next
seven to 10 years, whereas the Hamel segment would fall under 10 to 30 years and would be
based on opportunities and whether additional right-of-way would be needed. She stated that
the Park District only uses eminent domain when a community requests and supports that and
Medina has stated that it does not support that option therefore the timing would be based on
when opportunities present themselves.
Lee asked if Scherer has any comments related to the overpass.
Scherer stated that he has no comment.
Lee referenced the comment that was made that Hamel Road was chosen by default because
of the opposition expressed by other residents. He stated that Hamel Road provided access to
people north of Highway 55 to Baker Park, which the City currently does not offer and
something the other alignments did not provide. He thanked the youth members for their
input tonight.
Morrison commented that she feels that Medina is committed to its rural character and to
force rural landowners to have a trail near their livestock would not seem appropriate. She
acknowledged the point that this would connect to Baker Park but there would be options
through Corcoran that could provide that connection as well.
Mr. Lane referenced the question that was raised in respect to alternative trail options and
reminded the Commission that there is a paved trail from the north in Corcoran, across
Highway 55, through Loretto and into Baker Park which was paid for and constructed by
Three Rivers Park District. He stated that while it might be fine to have a pedestrian
overpass included in the long-range planning, there is access from the north to Baker Park.
A motion was made by Morrison and seconded by Norman to recommend that the City not
support a Diamond Lake Regional Trail route through Medina at this time.
A roll call vote was taken:
Lee nay
Sharp nay
Bernhardt aye
Norman aye
Hutchinson nay
Morrison aye
Jacob aye
Motion passed 4-3.
Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
May 19, 2021
Page 8 of 10
Finke commented that the intent is to present this recommendation to the City Council at the
June 1st meeting.
7) James and Meliss Korin – Pioneer Trail Preserve – 2325 Pioneer Trail – Park
Dedication Review
Finke presented a subdivision request for 2325 Pioneer Trail which would create three rural
lots on the 40-acre site. He stated that there is one house under construction on the property,
which is allowed and noted that home would fall under lot one if the request is ultimately
approved. He stated that the property does not have frontage on Pioneer Trail and would
receive access through an easement on the property to the east. He stated that the City would
have the option to request 10 percent of the buildable land, cash in lieu, or a combination of
the two. He noted that there are no park or trail improvements identified in this area and
therefore staff recommends cash in lieu to satisfy park dedication in the amount of $16,000.
Morrison asked if the cash in lieu would be made available to develop trails or whether it
could only be used for parks.
Finke confirmed that the funds would be available for trail construction, noting that most of
the trails in Medina are constructed using park dedication fees.
The Commissioners all agreed with the recommendation of cash in lieu to satisfy park
dedication.
A motion was made by Lee and seconded by Sharp to recommend cash in lieu of land in
the amount of $16,000 to satisfy park dedication requirements for the Pioneer Trail
Preserve Plat.
A roll call vote was taken:
Lee aye
Sharp aye
Bernhardt aye
Norman aye
Hutchinson absent
Morrison aye
Jacob aye
Motion passed unanimously.
8) Staff Report
General Items – Gallup stated that the City Council has been discussing a return to in person
Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
May 19, 2021
Page 9 of 10
meetings and noted that the tentative plan would be to return to in person
meetings in July. She asked for input on whether a park tour would be desired for
July. She noted that typically the Commission completes that in May but
postponed that because of the discussion tonight and concerns with COVID. She
stated that if a park tour is desired, she would suggest an alternate date other than
the regular meeting night. She stated that she will poll the Commission members
to determine the best date.
Jacob noted that if each member of the Commission could visit their assigned
park, an alternative would be for the group to provide updates on the status of
each of the parks.
Cavanaugh asked whether youth members are also assigned a park.
Gallup confirmed that the members of the Commission have been assigned
multiple parks and therefore she will let youth members choose a park which
would lessen the load of the Commission. She stated that she will follow up with
the youth members to determine which parks they would like.
Scherer reported that the ballfield lighting installation contract was awarded by
the Council the previous night and estimated that the lights would be delivered in
about three weeks and perhaps the goal to have the lights up and running before
the end of the season could be reached. He stated that the Public Works crew has
been working on the Arrowhead Drive trail connection near Loram and provided
an update, anticipating that would be completed in the next month.
Jacob asked when the adjacent project in Plymouth at Medina Road and 101
would be completed as that impacted traffic.
Scherer replied that project was only three days and was completed. He
recognized that the road parking is very active during baseball games. He stated
that he encouraged HAC to tell their members to use the overflow parking rather
than the roadway.
Lee asked if there is an update for Hunter Lions Park.
Scherer provided an update on that planning process, noting that they are working
on the grading for the pickleball courts to ensure there would not be drainage
problems for the neighboring properties.
Morrison stated that she has received questions from horseback riders north of 24
related to dedicated horse trails and when trails would be constructed. She asked
that the Commission also review the trails in addition to their assigned parks.
Scherer stated that there is no real update other than that staff needs to walk
through the Deer Hill development to determine where that will be placed. He
Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
May 19, 2021
Page 10 of 10
stated that the trailhead for the Marx property has not yet been established. He
also provided an update on a recent tree planting event in coordination with local
Scouts noting that approximately 380 trees were planted.
9) Adjourn
A motion was made by Sharp, seconded by Lee, to adjourn the meeting.
A roll call vote was taken:
Lee aye
Sharp aye
Bernhardt aye
Norman aye
Hutchinson absent
Morrison aye
Jacob aye
Motion passed unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:56 p.m.
TO: Medina Park Commission
FROM: Jodi Gallup, Assistant City Administrator
DATE: June 10, 2021
RE: Capital Improvement Plan & Park Funding
The City utilizes two main revenue sources to fund parks and trails: 1) Park Dedication Fund &
2) Municipal Park Fund, which are described below. These funds must maintain sufficient
balances to account for all future park and trail planning including new park amenities, land
acquisitions, and replacement costs for existing parks. The Capital Improvement Plan (attached)
helps the City budget out the next five years of spending for each of these funds. The Park
Commission’s Park Asset Inventory looks at the life of each asset in our parks to help us budget
out long term needs.
Park Dedication Fund
The Park Dedication Fund is to be used by the City Council as they see the need for new park
projects, outside of expenditures within the General Fund. Park Dedication funds are needed for
new park development, which is the intended use of Park Dedication funds, as mandated by state
statute. Park Dedication Fund projects are presented through the Capital Improvement Plan.
Revenues are generated from Park Dedication Fees charged on new developments.
According to the current Comprehensive Plan, when the entire city is built out, the City will have
received approximately $14.7 million dollars in Park Dedication funds, but all the planned
infrastructures would cost roughly $18.5 million dollars. This will happen over the next 20 to 30
years.
Current Park Dedication Fund Balance: $1,688,739
2021 Planned Park Dedication Allocations: $75,000 ballfield lights
$60,000 Arrowhead Trail (Meander)
$80,000 Arrowhead Trail (railroad – Loram)
$115,000 Hackamore Trail
$200,000 Medina Road Trail
Remaining balance after 2021 projects: $1,158,739
Municipal Park Fund
The Municipal Park Fund is to be used by the City Council as they see the need for park projects
and maintenance outside of expenditures within the General Fund and Park Dedication Fund.
Municipal Park Fund projects are primarily the replacement of existing park equipment and
structures that do not qualify for the Park Dedication Fund. Projects and replacements are
presented through the Capital Improvement Plan. Revenues are generated by taxes, grants and
donations from individuals, businesses and organizations.
In 2019, discussions and planning took place amongst staff, City Council, Park Commission and
community outreach to establish a 30-year replacement plan. A levy implementation was passed
for 2020 and onward to fund ongoing replacements. The current levy contribution into this fund is
$112,000 annually.
MEMORANDUM
Current Municipal Park Fund Balance: $480,000
2021 Planned Municipal Park Fund Projects: $25,000 Trail Replacement
$100,000 Hunter Lions Park – pickleball courts
$100,000 Lakeshore Park – redesign
$10,000 Medina Morningside Parking Area
Remaining balance after 2021 projects: $245,000
2022 CIP: DEPARTMENT
Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Potential Revenue Source
Municipal Park Replacements
Trails
Annual Trail Replacement 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ Municipal Park Fund
Hamel Legion Park
Holy Name Park
Hunter Lions Park
Full Park Reconstruction/Tennis Court 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ Municipal Park Fund/Grants/Donations
Lakeshore Park
Redesign/Large Playground Equipment 100,000$ 100,000$ Move money forward?Municipal Park Fund
Rainwater Nature Area
Maple Park
New baseball backstop 25,000$ 25,000$ Municipal Park Fund
Walnut Park
Medina Morningside Park
Playground curb/rubber under swings Municipal Park Fund
Replace baseball backstop Municipal Park Fund
Parking Area 10,000$ 10,000$ Municipal Park Fund
Medina Lake Preserve
Park Clean-up 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ Municipal Park Fund
Tomann Preserve - Park Development
The Park at Fields of Medina
285,000$ 235,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 155,000$ 155,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 155,000$ 155,000$ -$ -$
New Park Development
Trails
Arrowhead Tr Connection 55 -
Meander/Signal 60,000$ 60,000$ Park Dedication Fund
Arrowhead Trail Connection RR-Loram 80,000$ 80,000$ Park Dedication Fund
Hackamore Trail 230,000$ 115,000$ 263,000$ 131,000$ Park Ded/Cost Share w/ Corcoran
Medina Road Trail 200,000$ 200,000$ Park Dedication Fund
Medina Lake Preserve
Trail Head 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ Park Dedication Fund
Hamel Legion Park
Ball Field Lights at Paul Fortin Field 300,000$ 75,000$ Park Ded/Grant/Donation
Grand Stand at Paul Fortin Field 100,000$ -$ Donation/Grant
Park Land by Medina Golf & CC 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ Park Dedication Fund
Sioux Dr./HWY 55 Ped Crossing Future Study
Land Acquisitions / New Trails (rolling-used
as development occurs)250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ Park Dedication Fund
Parks Sub-total 1,120,000$ 780,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 638,000$ 406,000$ 275,000$ 275,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$
2022 - 2026 Capital Improvement Plan - DRAFT
2021 2022 2023 2024 20262025
1
Medina Park and Trails Asset Inventory
Sorted By Estimated Replacement Year Update Annually
Constucted/
Year Park Description Original Cost Est Replacm't Actual Replace Acquired Life Span Replacement
Cost Cost Year (in yrs)Year
2019 Lakeshore Garbage Enclosure 2004 15 2019
2020 Medina Morningside Parking area 10,000 2001 20 2020
2020 Walnut Basketball Hoop/Backboard 5,000 remove 20 2020
2021 Hunter Lions Park Redsign - tennis cts in bad repair. Baseball field not functional as built; playgrnd hidden from view 2006 15 2021
2021 Lakeshore Total park redsign and rebuild 170,000 2021
2021 Medina Morningside curb around playground 50,000 2001 20 2021
2021 Medina Morningside basketball hoop est 2001 20 2021
2021 Medina Morningside 4 swings (2 baby and 2 regular)2001 20 2021
2024 Lakeshore Grill (metal)remove 2004 20 2024
2024 Lakeshore two swings 2004 20 2024
2024 Lakeshore paved driveway down to water (treat like repaving parking lot)2004 20 2024
2024 Lakeshore concrete base at landing 2004 20 2024
2024 Lakeshore park entrance sign 2004 20 2024
2024 Holy Name garbage enclosure 2009 15 2024
2025 Lakeshore I.B.Boat Launch $18,917 2005 20 2025
2025 Maple Park baseball diamond 2000 25 2025
2025 Maple Park baseball backstop 2000 25 2025
2025 Medina Morningside wood picnic table by basketball court est 2010 15 2025
2026 Hunter Lions tennis court see 2021 above 20,000 2006 20 2026
2026 Hunter Lions basketball hoop see 2021 above 2006 20 2026
2026 Hunter Lions volleyball court see 2021 above 2006 20 2026
2026 Hunter Lions parking lot see 2021 above 2006 20 2026
2026 Hunter Lions bridge to nature area see 2021 above 2006 20 2026
2026 Maple Park soccer nets 2016 10 2026
2026 Medina Morningside Paved trail/path to playground est 2001 25 2026
2026 Medina Morningside Playground equipment 2001 25 2026
2026 Medina Morningside Two Pavillions 2001 25 2026
2026 Medina Morningside Soccer nets 2016 10 2026
2026 Medina Morningside baseball diamond 2001 25 2026
2026 Medina Morningside Baseball backstop 5,000 2001 25 2026
2026 Medina Morningside Three Picnic tables 2001 25 2026
2026 Medina Morningside 8 plastic? benches by baseball field 2001 25 2026
2027 Hamel Legion Light pole for skating rink 2007 20 2027
2027 Hamel Legion Lights on Little League Field 2007 20 2027
2027 Hamel Legion Tennis courts 2007 20 2027
2027 Hamel Legion Volleyball court 2007 20 2027
2027 Hamel Legion Park entrance sign 2007 20 2027
2027 Hamel Legion Basketball Court $22,838 2007 20 2027
2027 Fields of Medina Soccer nets 2017 10 2027
2027 Maple Park toilet enclosure 2012 15 2027
2027 Medina Morningside toilet enclosure est 2012 15 2027
2029 Lakeshore Playground Equipment Lakeshore Park*$25,081 2004 25 2029
2029 Lakeshore Picnic Table on Slab - 2 2004 25 2029
2029 Lakeshore picnic Table handicap on slab 2004 25 2029
2029 Lakeshore gate doors for boat launch 2004 25 2029
2029 Lakeshore pavillion with single picnic table 2004 25 2029
2029 Holy Name Holy Name Park acquisition/design $47,695 2009 20 2029
2029 Holy Name paving parking lot 2009 20 2029
2029 Holy Name Holy Name Church/School Sign 2009 20 2029
2029 Holy Name rain garden 2009 20 2029
2029 Holy Name dock 2009 20 2029
2030 City Hall Park all assets 2005 25 2030
2030 Hamel Legion Hamel Legion Park Trail $25,399 2005 25 2030
2030 Hamel Legion Overflow Parking Lot $12,040 2010 20 2030
2031 Hunter Lions Playground equipment -Structure see 2021 above $50,498 2006 25 2031
2031 Hunter Lions baseball field w/ backstop/Fences see 2021 above 2006 25 2031
2031 Hunter Lions Metal Bleachers see 2021 above 2006 25 2031
2032 Hamel Legion Hamel Legion Plaza $23,782 2007 25 2032
2032 Hamel Legion Hamel Legion Playground $32,904 2007 25 2032
2032 Hamel Legion Little league ball fields 2007 25 2032
2032 Hamel Legion Hawks ball field (fortin field)2007 25 2032
2032 Hamel Legion two pavillions with picnic tables 2007 25 2032
2032 Hunter Lions Park entrance sign 2012 20 2032
2032 Tomann Preserve Park entrance sign 2012 20 2032
2032 Holy Name park entrance sign 2012 20 2032
2032 Maple Park Park entrance sign 2012 20 2032
2032 Medina Lake Preserve Park entrance sign 2012 20 2032
2032 Medina Morningside Park entrance sign 2012 20 2032
2032 Trails Hunter Drive Trail Final Segment $28,920 2007 25 2032
2032 Trails Medina Trail $52,442 2007 25 2032
2033 Hamel Legion Hamel Legion Park Playground Equip $69,187 2008 25 2033
2034 Hamel Legion Bleachers - Hamel Park $6,041 2009 25 2034
2034 Holy Name Picnic Table on Slab - 3 2009 25 2034
2034 Holy Name pervious trail 2009 25 2034
2034 Holy Name paved trail 2009 25 2034
2035 Hamel Legion Donor Wall $6,836 2005 30 2035
2035 Hamel Legion Field House Irregation/LS $46,652 2010 25 2035
2035 Rainwater Trail 2010 25 2035
2035 Rainwater Rainwater Park (trails?)$114,098 2010 25 2035
2035 Maple Park two benches by baseball field 2010 25 2035
2035 Maple Park two picnic tables 2010 25 2035
2035 Tomann Preserve Trail Turf trail so may not need action action 2010 25 2035
2036 Fields of Medina Field of Medina Lights $17,669 2016 20 2036
2036 Fields of Medina Basketball hoop 2016 20 2036
2036 Fields of Medina Swings 2016 20 2036
2036 Fields of Medina Park entrance sign 2016 20 2036
2036 Trails Cty Rd 116 Trail $479,021 2011 25 2036
2037 Hamel Legion Hamel Legion Parking Lot $110,865 2017 20 2037
2037 Rainwater Rainwater Bridge $11,133 2017 20 2037
2037 Fields of Medina Fields of Medina Volleyball $5,814 2017 20 2037
2038 Hamel Legion Ballfield Scoreboard $15,346 2013 25 2038
2038 Maple Park gravel parking lot 2018 20 2038
2038 Trails Willow Trail $46,485 2013 25 2038
2040 Holy Name Pavillion with one picnic table 2015 25 2040
2040 Trails 101 Trail $10,865 2015 25 2040
2041 Hamel Legion Hamel Legion Scoreboard $17,195 2016 25 2041
2041 Fields of Medina Trail 2016 25 2041
2041 Fields of Medina Playground Equipement 2016 25 2041
2041 Shawnee Woods Trail Turf so may not need any action 2016 25 2041
2041 Trails Arrowhead Trail $155,604 2016 25 2041
2041 Trails Arrowhead Trail Easement $12,000 2016 25 2041
2043 Maple Park Pavillion 2018 25 2043
2044 Hamel Legion Ballfield Dugout Roof $9,873 2014 30 2044
2046 Fields of Medina Sport Court 2016 30 2046
2047 Hamel Legion Dugouts $16,605 2017 30 2047
2050 Hamel Legion Field House $427,673 2010 40 2050
TBD Rainwater Rock seating area
Annual Trails Annual Trail Replacement (place holder)25,000 yrly
Remove Walnut Basketball Court 20
TBD Walnut Watershed preservation
1
2021 Park Commission Goals
1. List of annual and planned 2021 items
i) January 20th – Annual Goal Setting Session
ii) February 17th – Diamond Lake Regional Trail – Review Recommended Route
iii) April 24th (Saturday) – Participate in Annual City Clean-up Day
iv) June 16th – Capital Improvement Plan Review
v) June 30th – Annual Park Tour
vi) September 18th – Participate in Annual Celebration Day (discuss in August)
vii) December 2nd – Annual Holiday/Recognition/Appreciation Party (mark your
calendars)
2. Create a list of available parks and trails grant opportunities with timelines. Review
applicable grants as they become available.
- Subcommittee: Lee, Sharp, Morrison
3. Municipal Park Funding/Robert G Mitchell Jr. Designated Beneficiary Fund
Annually review Municipal Park Fund asset inventory, determine life of assets,
replacement year, and needed funds for future replacement. Establish process for utilizing
funds from the Robert G Mitchell Jr. Designated Beneficiary Fund. Look into
possibilities and potential volunteers for creating a separate foundation for park
donations.
- Subcommittee: Lee and Jacob
4. Calendarization of park asset replacement
Review the Municipal Park Fund asset inventory to schedule out needed replacements in
the five-year capital improvement plan.
- Subcommittee: Lee and Jacob
2021 Planned Park & Trail Improvements
Trails
• Arrowhead Trail Connection Railroad-Loram
• Hackamore Trail
• Medina Road Trail (Brockton to Hunter)
• Deerhill Preserve Trails – identify trail corridor and plan trail construction schedule
Hamel Legion Park
• Discuss adding light pole to sledding hill. Look into solar options.
• Create funding strategy for ball field light grant
Hunter Lions Park
• Begin implementing phased park improvements
o Subcommittee: Lee, Jacob, Bernhardt
2
Lakeshore Park
• Engage in community/neighborhood outreach to seek resident input on a park redesign
with a goal to increase use of the park, look into options for adding a basketball court or
sport court, adding seating with views of the lake while preserving the current park assets
(playground equipment).
o Subcommittee: Hutchinson and Steve Lee
Walnut Park
• Update signage
Medina Morningside Park
• Update parking area
Potential Land Acquisition
• Options for park land purchase in the Chippewa/Mohawk area
• Connection to Baker Park
• Connection to Medina Lake Preserve
• Research land opportunities for future dog park
o Subcommittee: Lee, Bernhardt, Norman
Park Commissioner Park Assignments for 2021
o Holy Name Park – Katya Cavanaugh
o City Hall – Angela Bernhardt
o Maple Park – Mary Morrison
o Hunter Lions Park – John Jacob
o Rainwater Nature Area – Mary Morrison
o Hamel Legion Park – John Jacob & Nila Norman
o Medina Morningside Park – Steve Lee
o Lakeshore Park – Troy Hutchinson
o Walnut Park – Troy Hutchinson
o Tomann Preserve – Steve Lee
o Medina Lake Preserve – Nila Norman
o The Park at Fields of Medina – Terry Sharp
o Harriet Woods – John Jacob
o Shawnee Woods – Terry Sharp
Agenda Item #7A
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: June 10, 2021
MEETING: June 15, 2021 City Council
SUBJ: Diamond Lake Regional Trail Master Plan
Background
At the June 1, 2021 meeting, the City Council discussed the additional public engagement related
to a master plan for the potential future construction of the Diamond Lake Regional Trail
(DLRT). The packet included substantial amounts of information summarizing the public
engagement. This information was not reproduced for the June 15 meeting, but is available upon
request.
Following additional public comment and discussion by Council members, the Council tabled
the matter and requested additional information. The consensus of the City Council also
appeared to be to remove the option north of Highway 55 and west of Arrowhead Drive from
consideration.
The proposed route now being discussed for the DLRT Master Plan in Medina is displayed on
the attached map. As discussed at length during the June 1 meeting, it is important to note that
the Master Plan route is conceptual and approximate at this route. Implementation and
construction is still years or decades in the future. As more analysis is completed on the Master
Plan and as opportunities arise in the future, the exact location of the trail is likely to adjust from
the line on the Master Plan. The trail location may shift by a parcel in either direction and will
meander through development sites.
A memorandum from Three Rivers Park District staff is attached addressing the additional
information requested by the City Council at the June 1 meeting.
Park Commission Recommendation
The Park Commission discussed this item at their May 19 meeting. An excerpt from the draft
meeting minutes is attached for reference.
The Commission provided an opportunity for residents to address the matter, although the Chair
noted that the Commission had been provided an intensive summary of feedback and had the
opportunity to review all previously received comments such that it was not necessary to repeat
things previously submitted. Four residents spoke at the meeting. Two opposed the route along
Hamel Road near their homes and two opposed the eastern route across their property near
Bridgewater which is guided for potential Low Density Residential redevelopment.
The feedback from the Park Commission was divided on the matter. Three Commissioners
believed it was in the long-term interest of the City to plan for the regional trail connection. In
Diamond Lake Regional Trail Page 1 of 2 June 15, 2021
Long Term Master Plan City Council Meeting
addition, the two Youth Members spoke in favor of supporting the regional connection in
Medina. Four Commissioners indicated that they did not support the regional trail in Medina.
On a motion of 4-3 (Youth Members do not vote), the following motion was passed:
Recommend that the City not support a Diamond Lake Regional Trail route through
Medina at this time.
Potential Actions
After the City Council has completed its review of the information, one of the following actions
could be considered:
• Move to approve inclusion of the conceptual route in the Diamond Lake Regional Trail
Master Plan within Medina.
OR
• Move to request that a route through Medina not be included in the Diamond Lake
Regional Trail Master Plan at this time.
Attachment
1. Map displaying DLRT route in Medina
2. Memo addressing information requested by Council at June 1 meeting
3. Right-of-way Review
4. Visuals of example overpasses
Diamond Lake Regional Trail Page 2 of 2 June 15, 2021
Long Term Master Plan City Council Meeting
•
f 105155 5 05to
aa raeYfue4r .
trA
Irai/Memenn tiane JRANFeee
—w waaewe tM
arch
roarer
r_ sour
REGIONAL TRAIL OPTION ALONG HAMEL ROAD
DESIGN O PPORT UN IT IES
• No driveway or ro ad crossings.
• Low tragic volume.
• Ability to Alin Bake r Park Res erve 141 1.6
miles of trail to co nnec t to CR 19
• Overhead Wirth . In public RO W on with sto -
ol Hamel Road bu t space to place toil in Baite r
Park
DESIG N CHA LLENGES
• 1.300 LF of wetlan d crossing.
DE SI GN OPPOR TUNI TIES
• Low traffic vokana.
• Diced oonn ectlon fr om northeast
Medina a nd Haman area m Baker Park
R awrva.
• Corridor h as high scenic quaMsa m
nuel Medina
DESIGN CHALLENGES
- 5501inear foet al wetland confli cts on
the north side of Hamel Reed; 1,100
linear feet of wetland conflicts on th e
south aide of Hemel Road.
• Challenging intersedian on curve at
Pioneer Trail .
• Potential Impacts to r oadway ditch with
trail constr uction may require additional
right of way easem ents.
• 7 driveway cros sings on the north side
of Hamel Road; 10 driveway crossings
on Iha south side of Hamel Road.
0,10
• Although abo veiround utilities are
parent. they are more concentrated on
the south side 01 Hemel Road .
• Ektchrg roadw ay m a r ural oronwaclbn
with no existing curb and gutter or dorm
sewer
• 3 roadway crossing s on the north side
f Ha mel Road; 2 roadway crossings on
the south side of Hamel Road .
• Areas of steep slopes and wetlands
Immediately adjacent to the roadway
within the fight of w ay .
• Sle ep grades and adjacent wetlands
may req uire walls or boardwalk
dme0ures.
• Tr ail would Impact gravel shoulder on
one side of the ro adw ay that is heavily
used by eque strians.
y DESIGN CH3/LLEyf G,E^s
MI mum,
DESI GN OPPO RTUNI TI!1
• L ow trait vakane .
• Althou gh ab ovairound utgkbe
ere present, they are more
concentrated on the mouth side
of Hack.more Road fora short
dbenc a.
• Scenic views of w.tl.nd .
• Adjacent b aa htln9 d.valopmanl
wed aid e. 1 roadw ay crossing en
the s outh/east aide.
• Troll eMends along gravel road .
• Potential Impacts to roadway ditch
with tlal constr uction may requite
additional light of way easements .
DESIGN OPP OR TUNITIES
• Low milk volume.
• Gntlawepar.Hd rowing ov er
55
• Con nection nnection to future Myrrh,
Mbdfe School al Tamarack Drive
• Coombs to Fla b. of M edina Park.
• Altho ugh .bov. •gro und utNllea
ar e pnwW , toy Ire moo
c oncentrated o nto south aide of
Hamel R ow/
DE SI GN C HALLE NGES
• 800 lnear feet of wetland conflicts
onto nodhAva d ebe; 1,800 lin ear
feet of wetla nd conflicts on the
so Ihleast 0140.
• Potenti al Impacts to roadway ditch
with trs1 wnetmotlen may require
additional right of w ay eas ements.
• 10 driveway 01000199, on the
north/went aid e; 3 driveway
erosdngs on the southeast aide .
• 4 ro ad way cros sings on the node
s ad side; 3 roadway crossings on
the wWNwd aide.
• Steep grades may require walls .
• Large wetlan d crossing north of
Fields of Medina .
• Trail crosses privat e property.
WIT 2011 "ssre.r. 'if•:n
•
•
1
MM
•
df
•
•
•
Diamond Lake Regional Trail Master Plan
Memo to City of Medina in response to the open questions/issues
from the June 1, 2021 Medina City Council meeting discussion
Prepared by Stephen Shurson and Kelly Grissman, Three Rivers Park District
ThreeRivers
PARK DISTRICT
Right-of-way along Hamel Road
Hennepin County Half Section maps for the Hamel Road area show a 66' wide (33' each side of
centerline of road) plat (No. 84) for the Hamel Road (CSAH 115) right-of-way. However, the plat does
not indicate if the County was granted an easement or has fee title ownership or not. Some of the
properties along Hamel Road (County Road 115) were recently platted and road easements appear to
have been granted to the County. For the other un-platted properties, it is not known definitively if
there is any granted right-of-way. City staff has a map showing the recently platted properties with road
easements.
Confirming where right-of-way exists along the Hamel Road/CSAH 115 corridor requires title research
work for each underlying property which can be costly and time consuming. This work is most
efficiently done during the design development stage after the side of road for the trail is determined
and prior to trail design. In addition, Hennepin County may acquire additional right-of-way in future,
prior to when trail design and construction is to occur.
Furthermore, title searches at this time would be premature as we do not know where property rights
would be required, what side of the road the trail would be located or where private property would be
temporarily impacted to construct the regional trail. Determining a reasonable quantity/extent of such
easements requires a more extensive evaluation of the topography, hydrology and existing conditions
which, as previously stated, is typically done during the design development phase and after the side of
the road is determined.
At this phase of the master plan, the following can be assumed regarding where easements may be
required:
• Easements may be most likely needed where physical or geographic challenges are located
adjacent to the right-of-way.
• Easements may be needed in locations where Hennepin County has not yet secured right-of-
way by the time of design of the trail.
• Temporary construction easements may be needed along the entire length of the trail at the
time of construction.
As with all regional trail projects, Three Rivers will strive to minimize the need to secure additional
property rights from private properties and to minimize property impacts through a careful and
thoughtful design process which includes and evaluates a wide range of creative design options
(narrower trail width, boardwalks, alternative road designs, retaining walls and similar). The goal
remains to only move forward on a willing -seller basis and to restore properties back to their original
condition as much as reasonably practical, to maintain existing drainage patterns and to adhere to all
rules and regulations in respect to wetland impacts, stormwater management and similar.
Identifying a preferred route in a master plan helps inform Hennepin County and the City on future right-
of-way needs as new subdivisions occur in the years or decades prior to trail construction.
TH 55 Crossing - East Option
Given the many variables and moving parts of this corridor and the adjacent land uses, development
opportunities and property ownership, the location of the locally preferred TH 55 crossing at Tamarack
is viewed as conceptual in nature. The crossing location may shift east or west to best coordinate with
opportunities as they present themselves - such as willing landowners, commercial development, local
transportation system buildout and more. Ultimately, there may be several engineering and design
options or solutions to coordinate the bridge design and location with the future development plans of
the area.
As such, the crossing location of TH 55 and adjacent trail segments are inherently flexible at this time.
Three Rivers proposes writing the master plan to specifically note this flexibility and suggests a future
dedicated, independent (separate from the master plan) study in partnership with future development
proposals/plans to determine the best location and way to integrate the crossing with future local
development plans and initiatives.
Regional Trail Search Area Corridors and Purpose
Three Rivers is responsible to provide regional recreation offerings which serve the broader region and
State of Minnesota. This is governed by Minnesota Statues, specifically Chapter 398 — Park Systems and
the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Regional Parks and Open Space Policy Plan. Regional trail corridors
bring regional recreation offerings close to where people live and help connect people to regional parks
and trails via foot or bike.
Within the City of Medina there are two regional trail search corridors —the Diamond Lake Regional Trail
search corridor (DLRT, north -south corridor, within the eastern half of Medina, continues north through
Corcoran, Rogers and Dayton and South through Orono, Long Lake and Wayzata) and the Lake Sarah
Regional Trail search corridor (LSRT, east -west corridor, centered on Hamel Road in Medina, continues
east through Plymouth, New Hope and Crystal and west through Independence and Greenfield). Both of
these corridors extend beyond Medina and connect multiple communities as well as existing, planned
and proposed regional parks and trails.
The corridors do not function as intended when portions of the corridors are eliminated from further
evaluation and consideration as this severs connectivity and often shifts the trail from serving a regional
to local purpose.
In the case of Medina, eliminating the portion of the DLRT search corridor south of Hamel Road
required Three Rivers to revise the search corridor goals and desired destinations. It also impacted the
route and connections further south in neighboring communities. A new route which utilized Baker Park
Reserve was identified as an alternative option.
The alternative route connects directly to Baker Park Reserve, a regional destination, and allows for
Three Rivers to still achieve its north -south corridor goal, just less directly. This option also utilizes the
western portion of the LSRT search corridor which reduces the long-term amount of private property
needs, infrastructure investment and long-term operation and maintenance requirements within
Medina. From a local perspective, it helps connect the areas of Medina north and south of TH 55 via a
new grade separated crossing for people walking, biking, running and biking and improves safe walking,
running and biking access to Baker Park Reserve for local residents.
At a future date, Three Rivers intends to further study the eastern portion of the LSRT and look for a
safe, user friendly route to the Wayzata High School Complex. This route would provide a connection to
downtown Hamel and associated parks and community gathering spaces supporting local priorities. This
planning work is likely five years out. Should this be a higher priority for the City, the City is welcome to
continue to study this route and propose a preferred route to Three Rivers for consideration. The City is
also welcome to develop this as a local trail connection which could become part of the LSRT at a future
date.
As such, Three Rivers views the eastern and western Hamel Road corridor not as an 'either/or' option,
but rather as an 'and'. The western portion of the Hamel Road corridor would be planned now as part
of the DLRT corridor and the eastern portion would be planned at a later date as part of the LSRT
planning process. Despite the west section being planned first, it is possible that the east segment
would actually be constructed first depending on available funding, shared priorities and other
opportunities as they present themselves.
Three Rivers is not interested in pursing the eastern Hamel route or terminating at Hamel Legion Park, a
local destination, without the western route as it provides no reassurance to Three Rivers that the City
would be a willing and supportive partner at a later date to make the desired regional connections.
Without this support and commitment for the broader goal, the 'regional trail' and TH 55 crossing would
be predominately local serving and not appropriate for regional funds or Three Rivers partnership.
If the City is still interested pursing a western connection to either Baker Park Reserve or the Lake
Independence Regional Trail, but is not supportive of the Hamel Road concepts, the City may elect to
study this independently and propose a preferred route which best meets both regional and local
priorities.
Should the City elect to eliminate the western Hamel Road from consideration or not determine another
westly route option with regional connectivity, Three Rivers would abandon future regional trail
planning efforts in Medina for the foreseeable future and work with adjacent communities to fulfill the
DLRT and LSRT search corridor goals.
D 0.5 1 2Miles
i . i
Regional Trails in Medina
hme 9, 2021
A 7hreeRivers
COUNTY ROAD 24
Hamel Road
(East of Tamarack)
Right -of -Way (ROW)
Preliminary Review
Legend
ROW
Parcel w/ likely ROW
Unknown/Unlikely ROW
Properties north of Hamel Road:
20 out of 38 parcels likely have ROW
Properties south of Hamel Road:
36 out of 52 parcels likely have ROW
0 025 0 .5
,CHESTNUT
/
�4iIlAORGAN
.HARMO NY r .
WNEE-W OOD$ ",
T
2
CHEYENNE ," Z'
Hamel Road
(West of Tamarack)
Right - of -Way (ROW)
Preliminary Review
Legend
Parcel w/ lik ely ROW
Unknown/Unlik ely R OW
Properties north of Hamel Road:
6 out of 17 parcels likely have ROW
Properties south of Hamel Road:
16 out of 22 parcels likely have ROW
0 0 .25 0.5
Mlles
Hennepin
Fliuht d ate: January 4. 2019
https://oblique.sanborn.com/Hennepin/?I1=45.008679,-93.349387&zoom=19
•
.
•
•
.
f
•
•
•
1
.
.
•
•
•
•
•
•
.
•
•
.
•
.
•
a
•
.
•
•
•
L
.■
•
.
•
.
•
■
•
•
tip
•
•
.
7
•
-. •
•
9.
•
•
•
•
.
.
.
•
L
.
•
•
Z
.
•
. .
A'
•
—I.
•
r
•
.
•
.i
•
•
•
■
•
•
11
•
Hennepin
Flight date: January 4. 2019
https://oblique.sanborn.com/Hennepin/?II=44. 944894,-93. 342082&zoom=20
. — A .m P.
•
■
•
•
•
.
•
ir
•
■
•
.
•
7
.
Alb
.
.
.
.
t
■
.
-
■
•
•
▪ . r •
.-
ar
-.r isip r
c s?r
1 . Am
.
✓ ti.
.
r a
•
-Fa
•
■
Ir
.
•
•
•
•
.
•
•
•
.
.
.
•
r
1•
—
i
4
.
-- 1
C
.
.
.
.la
•
•
.
.
J
•
•
.
. .
•
•
•
•
1
•
■
.
■
■ -
r
•
■
. -
•
• .-•
ar
• .;1
.■
.
•
.
1.
■
.-
.
.
.
7
1
.
•
i
1
4
•
..
.
•
.
•
.