Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout03.17.2021 Park Commission Meeting Packet Posted 3/12/2021 Page 1 of 1 AGENDA MEDINA PARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, MARCH 17, 2021 7:00 P.M. Meeting to be held telephonically pursuant Minn. Stat. Sec. 13D.021 1) Call to Order 2) Additions to Agenda 3) Approval of the Minutes from:  February 16, 2021 Work Session  February 17, 2021 Regular Meeting  February 23, 2021 Work Session  March 2, 2021 Work Session 4) Public Comments (on items not on the agenda) 5) City Council Update 6) Diamond Lake Regional Trail – Process Update 7) Hamel Athletic Club – Program Update and Ball Field Lights Grant 8) Staff Report a) General Items 9) Adjourn Telephonic Meeting Call-in Instructions Dial 1-612-517-3122 Enter Conference ID: 384 177 109# 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Medina Park Commission FROM: Jodi Gallup, Assistant City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: March 12, 2021 DATE OF MEETING: March 17, 2021 SUBJECT: Park Commission Meeting Report 2. Additions to Agenda If any Park Commissioner wishes to add an item to the agenda after the agenda has already been posted, the agenda item must be proposed at this point in the meeting. The Park Commission must agree to add the item by motion. No attachments for this item. 5. City Council Update This is a reoccurring agenda item to have the City Council Liaison to the Park Commission give an update at each meeting on what is happening at the Council level. City Council member Joseph Cavanaugh has been appointed as the Liaison to the Park Commission for 2021. No attachments for this item. 6. Diamond Lake Regional Trail – Process Update In consideration of residents’ concerns heard at our previous meetings for any regional trail within the City, Three Rivers Park District staff has requested that the City Council and Park Commission confirm the City’s desire to move forward with additional regional trail planning efforts within the northern portion of the City and, if interested in proceeding, to authorize the general conceptual routes for consideration before additional engagement and evaluation occurs. If the City Council and Park Commission would prefer to not move forward with any additional regional trail planning efforts at this time, the Park District is comfortable identifying and evaluating alternative routes outside of Medina. Some things to consider in deciding if the City should move forward with regional trail planning efforts in the northern portion of the City: • Hwy 55 Crossing – The City’s trail plan has identified the need for a safe crossing over Highway 55. A safe grade-separated crossing is unlikely without the support of a regional trail. • Many of the trails on the northern route are shown as City trails and would likely come into being with or without Three Rivers Park District. If some of these City trail segments become a regional trail, Three Rivers Park District will take over the future maintenance of the regional trail. • Connecting the Hamel area to Baker Park is a goal, which could be met through this regional trail. • There has been more positive public support for a regional trail in the more densely populated areas of the City. See attached memo and maps. 2 Recommended Action: Discuss next steps. 7. Hamel Athletic Club – Program Update and Ball Field Lights Grant In November 2020, the Hamel Athletic Club applied for a grant to light the Paul Fortin Field. The City was recently informed that we had been awarded the ball field lights grant in the amount of $148,490, which is approximately half of the overall project cost. The Hamel Athletic Club will be presenting a funding strategy proposal at the March Park Commission meeting. Staff has included a park funding memo in the packet to provide a quick summary of our two main funding sources and the current account balances in each fund. See attached presentation and park funding memo. Recommended Action: Recommend to the City Council next steps for moving forward with the ball field lights project. 8. Staff Report a. General Items. This agenda item is to give a verbal update on any other general park items. Staff representation at the March 17th Park Commission meeting will be Planning Director Dusty Finke, Assistant City Administrator Jodi Gallup and Public Works Director Steve Scherer. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1 February 16, 2021 DRAFT 1 2 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL AND PARK COMMISSION CONCURRENT WORK 3 SESSION MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 16, 2021 4 5 The City Council and Park Commission of Medina, Minnesota met in work session on 6 February 16, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Martin presided. 7 8 Martin read a statement explaining that this meeting is being held in a virtual format 9 because of the ongoing pandemic. She provided instructions for public participation. 10 11 I. ROLL CALL 12 13 Council Members present: Albers, Cavanaugh, DesLauriers, Martin, and Reid. 14 15 Council Members absent: None. 16 17 Park Commission Members present: Bernhardt, Jacob, Lee, Morrison, Norman, and 18 Sharp. 19 20 Park Commission Members absent: Hutchinson. 21 22 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, Assistant City Administrator Jodi 23 Gallup, Finance Director Erin Barnhart, City Planning Director Dusty Finke, Public Works 24 Director Steve Scherer, and Chief of Police Jason Nelson. 25 26 II. DIAMOND LAKE REGIONAL TRAIL 27 Martin commented that the Council will not express an opinion on a trail route but will 28 hear the presentation and welcome input on the trail route and other elements. She 29 recognized the need to balance the amenity of a trail with residential privacy and the 30 protection of natural resources, such as wetlands. 31 32 Kelly Grissman, Three Rivers Park District, commented that the Medina staff and its 33 appointed and elected officials have been great to work with throughout this process. 34 She introduced the other members of the Three Rivers Park team available on the call 35 tonight. She appreciated the openness of the Council to extend the meeting in the event 36 additional time is needed to hear additional public comments and input. She stated that 37 tonight they will present the current recommended route and receive public input, noting 38 that an ultimate decision will come at a later date. She provided background information 39 on the Diamond Lake Regional Trail project and its planning timeline. She provided 40 photographic examples of what the trail and different trail segment amenities could look 41 like throughout Medina. She stated that Three Rivers Park District developed a robust 42 public engagement process and reviewed the different opportunities that have been 43 provided thus far. She noted that more engagement opportunities were provided for 44 Medina residents, compared to other surrounding areas, and noted that the participation 45 levels were also higher for Medina residents. She summarized the input that has been 46 received in support of different trail options. She stated that Medina residents have not 47 expressed the same level of support of other communities as there is great concern over 48 impacts to private property, privacy, and nature. She stated that realization for this 49 project is most likely 20 to 30 years out, but this planning process is necessary to allow 50 for future planning efforts to move forward as development and other opportunities come 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2 February 16, 2021 forward. She stated that they would most likely focus on trial segments in other 1 communities where development opportunities are arising. She reviewed the master 2 plan process, noting that they want to provide opportunity for all interested members to 3 hear details and provide input. She anticipated that they would ask for Park Commission 4 and City Council approvals for the alignment in late March and possibly into April in 5 order to hear the public input and make amendments if necessary. 6 7 Stewart Crosby, SRF, displayed the multiple route alternatives that have been reviewed 8 throughout this process for the area within Medina. He stated that they have received 9 public input throughout this process and one additional route was added as an option for 10 the west side and was based on public input to connect the trail to City Hall on CR 24 11 and in order to align the corridor along the edges of parcels rather than cutting through 12 parcels. He provided a brief overview of the analysis that was done for each potential 13 trail segment along with comments that were received noting that the information is also 14 available in more detail on both the City and Three Rivers Park District websites. He 15 commented on the large number of wetlands throughout Medina that will be a challenge 16 for any route. He displayed the recommended trail route along with alternate route 17 options and identified elements that would be required in certain areas, such as grade 18 separated crossings. He stated that they have continued to receive the question as to 19 the benefit of the western route. He stated that all the different subsegment corridors 20 have been reviewed and there are opportunities and challenges for each. He stated that 21 one of the main goals is to create a linear park that is not along roadways. He noted that 22 as the trail heads north, development is not as extreme and therefore there are more 23 opportunities. He stated that the Medina trail will involve crossing busy roads and the 24 western route provides the opportunity to connect or get close to local parks through 25 local trail connections. He stated that they prefer an off-road trail that provides more of a 26 park experience and the recommended route would provide for that experience whereas 27 other routes would work much more within road right-of-way and the challenges that 28 would bring. 29 30 Martin stated that she will now provide opportunities for members of the public to speak. 31 She noted that the Council has received and read the written comments received thus 32 far. 33 34 Hellen Heely referenced the trail segment above Wilshire Wood. She believed that there 35 is currently a raspberry farm in that location. She stated that is a beautiful area but is 36 concerned that the older couple that owns that property could perhaps not join the 37 meeting to provide their input tonight. She asked if there has been contact with that 38 landowner. 39 40 Stephen Shurson with Three Rivers Park District stated that he is unsure if there has 41 been direct contact. He noted that the couple has been alerted to the public meetings. 42 43 Heely commented that the landowner is an older couple that have invested a lot of time 44 and resources into their property and asked how that landowner would be engaged in 45 terms of attempting to acquire land for the trail. 46 47 Shurson replied that the routes are flexible, even though a line is shown on the map. He 48 explained that they work individually with property owners. 49 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3 February 16, 2021 Grissman commented that they would work with each property owner to manage their 1 concerns and input and locate the trail in a manner which would have the least impact 2 on their property. She stated that buffers, berms, fencing or additional vegetation could 3 be added to provide additional separation. She stated that some agricultural properties 4 welcome a trail as that would expose their business to additional customers. 5 6 Martin stated that perhaps Ms. Heely would suggest that it would be helpful for Three 7 Rivers Park District to reach out directly to that property owner at this time in the 8 process. She noted that perhaps a home visit would be appropriate as the resident may 9 not be technologically advanced. 10 11 Heely commented that she and her neighbors are concerned with routing the trail 12 through the Tamarack Drive area. She stated that if the western route is chosen, she 13 would be concerned that it would dump that responsibility to those property owners. 14 15 Shurson commented that he would be more than happy to meet with Ms. Heely 16 individually and reach out to those property owners directly as well. 17 18 Heely confirmed that she would provide the necessary contact information. 19 20 Martin commented on the difficulty she had reviewing the maps and asked if perhaps the 21 larger scale maps could be posted to the website. 22 23 Nick Schultz stated that he lives across from City Hall. He asked if Mohawk Drive would 24 be used for the trail segment or where that segment would be located. 25 26 Shurson commented that is yet to be determined as they do not provide that level of 27 specificity at this point in the planning process. He stated that they would want to have a 28 safe interaction with City Hall and the crossing of CR 24. He commented that there 29 would be another engagement process when the design is ultimately discussed. 30 31 Schultz stated that crossing of CR 24 is not safe, noting that he was hit on a bicycle in 32 the past. He stated that there was a period of time when a trail was constructed along 33 CR 19 and asked if there is a reason that trail is not being used as it connects to Baker 34 Park. 35 36 Grissman commented that this would be an additional route with the Lake Independence 37 Regional Trail running along the west and the other regional trail option to the east along 38 CR 101. She stated that the intent is to provide access to all residents in Hennepin 39 County and this would be a middle route that would not be road based and would 40 instead provide a parklike atmosphere. She recognized that some sections along the 41 20-mile route would be adjacent to roads, but they will take as many opportunities as 42 possible to take the trail off the road system, as that is preferred by most regional trail 43 users. 44 45 Schultz asked how residents will be notified of future meetings. 46 47 Martin commented that she believes that residents can signup for the email list to 48 receive notifications. 49 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4 February 16, 2021 Gallup confirmed that would be an option and noted that all upcoming meetings are also 1 posted on the City website. 2 3 Angela Erickson stated that the proposed route currently does not utilize Hunter Drive 4 but wants to be a voice for the residents on Hunter Drive. She stated that the residents 5 on Hunter Drive developed a petition opposing the trail in that location because of 6 concerns with crossing roadways, implications to large mature trees, and impacts to 7 property values. She stated that there are also properties within the Minnesota Land 8 Trust in that area. She noted that there is a strong coalition of property owners on 9 Hunter Drive that oppose any route that would use Hunter Drive. 10 11 Jim Stetler, 1832 Medina Road, stated that he submitted written comments in opposition 12 of the western most route option and would like additional time to discuss this with his 13 neighbors. He stated that they are new to the area and just built a new home, 14 attempting to be careful in the positioning of their home to respect the rural character of 15 Medina and be respectful of their neighbors. He commented that they were drawn to 16 Medina because of the rural and peaceful setting. He stated that most of what they face 17 to the west is wetland and that provided security knowing that the area would be 18 protected from development. He stated that he would be concerned that the trail would 19 run the entire length of his property and his family would then be facing a 1,000-foot 20 boardwalk. He commented on the impacts to wildlife that could also occur from that trail 21 segment. He stated that as park like as the experience may be for users it is to the 22 detriment of homeowners in that area. 23 24 Martin commented that some residents have stated that they did not feel they had 25 adequate time to review the proposed route, which is why this opportunity will be 26 extended for additional written and verbal comments to be received. She stated that this 27 meeting will be continued to Tuesday, February 23rd, for those that do not have time to 28 provide comments tonight and noted that written comments can be submitted within that 29 next week as well. 30 31 Johnson stated that staff recommends that the February 23rd worksession begin at 6:00 32 p.m. 33 34 Emily Byfuglien, 1862 Morgan Road, commented that they are strongly opposed to this. 35 She noted that when they purchased their 30-acre property it was with the intent that her 36 husband could use the land for hunting. She was concerned that once the trails are 37 built, her husband would no longer be able to use the land for hunting. She stated that 38 they previously lived on Lake Minnetonka, but it was too busy and therefore relocated 39 here to have more privacy. She stated the idea of trails with a high volume of pedestrian 40 traffic is not something they prefer. 41 42 Martin was unsure if staff would be prepared to respond to the issue of hunting tonight 43 but stated that staff will look into that and try to provide a response. She stated that she 44 does have to close the public comment period at this time, but it will continue February 45 23rd at 6:00 p.m. She noted that residents can also submit written comments prior to 46 that meeting date. 47 48 49 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5 February 16, 2021 III. ADJOURN 1 Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Reid, to adjourn the meeting on behalf of the City 2 Council at 6:56 p.m. 3 4 A roll call vote was performed: 5 6 DesLauriers aye 7 Albers aye 8 Cavanaugh aye 9 Reid aye 10 Martin aye 11 12 Motion passed unanimously. 13 14 Moved by Lee, seconded by Sharp, to adjourn the meeting on behalf of the Park 15 Commission at 6:56 p.m. 16 17 A roll call vote was performed: 18 19 Norman aye 20 Morrison aye 21 Sharp aye 22 Bernhardt aye 23 Lee aye 24 Jacobs aye 25 26 Motion passed unanimously. 27 28 Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT February 17, 2021 Page 1 of 4 The Park Commission of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on February 17, 2021 at 7:00 p.m., which was held virtually pursuant Minn. Stat. Sec. 13D.021. Park Commission Chair John Jacob presided. 1) Call to Order Commissioners Present: Mary Morrison, John Jacob, Angela Bernhardt, Nila Norman, Steve Lee, Troy Hutchinson Commissioners Absent: Terry Sharp Also Present: City Council member Joseph Cavanaugh, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, Assistant City Administrator Jodi Gallup 2) Additions to the Agenda: None. 3) Approval of the Minutes from: • January 20, 2021 Meeting A motion was made by Jacob and seconded by Lee to approve the minutes from January 20, 2021 as presented. A roll call vote was taken: Park Commissioner Mary Morrison - aye Park Commissioner Angela Bernhardt – aye Park Commissioner Steve Lee - aye Park Commissioner Nila Norman – aye Park Commissioner Troy Hutchinson – aye Park Commissioner John Jacob – aye Motion passed unanimously. 4) Public Comments (on items not on the agenda): None. 5) City Council Update Cavanaugh provided an update on recent City Council actions. 6) Diamond Lake Regional Trail – Update on Process Jacob noted that the Park Commission held a concurrent meeting with the City Council on the previous evening to hear a presentation from Three Rivers Park District on the trail route options and preferred route based on comments received during the public engagement/comment period. He noted this meeting will be continued to February 23rd and potentially March 2nd to allow sufficient time to hear additional public comments. He called for a motion to schedule the additional meetings. Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT February 17, 2021 Page 2 of 4 A motion was made by Jacob and seconded by Lee to call for additional special meetings of the Park Commission to discuss the Diamond Lake Regional Trail on February 23, 2021 at 6 p.m. and on March 2, 2021 at 6 p.m. A roll call vote was taken: Park Commissioner Mary Morrison - aye Park Commissioner Angela Bernhardt – aye Park Commissioner Steve Lee - aye Park Commissioner Nila Norman – aye Park Commissioner Troy Hutchinson – aye Park Commissioner John Jacob – aye Motion passed unanimously. The Park Commission briefly discussed their role in recommending a trail route to the City Council for approval. It was noted that they plan on doing their due diligence in listening to everyone’s concerns, visiting the potential routes, and considering all options prior to making any recommendations. 7) 2021 Park Commission Goals The Park Commission reviewed and finalized the 2021 goals list and provided the following direction: • The Grant Opportunities subcommittee will try to meet prior to the March 17th meeting to provide an update on potential grants. • Lee volunteered to serve on the Lakeshore Park subcommittee with Hutchinson. A motion was made by Morrison and seconded by Hutchinson to adopt the 2021 Park Commission goals. A roll call vote was taken: Park Commissioner Mary Morrison - aye Park Commissioner Angela Bernhardt – aye Park Commissioner Steve Lee - aye Park Commissioner Nila Norman – aye Park Commissioner Troy Hutchinson – aye Park Commissioner John Jacob – aye Motion passed unanimously. 8) Hunter Lions Park Final Master Plan Scherer reviewed the Hunter Lions Park Master Plan cost sheet with the Park Commission, detailing the line items for the tennis and pickleball courts that could be completed by the Public Works crew to reduce the overall project costs. Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT February 17, 2021 Page 3 of 4 Scherer noted that the original projected total cost for the tennis court and pickleball courts came to $347,685, which he was able to reduce by $142,236.00. These savings are captured through public works employees completing the demolition of the old courts, earthwork, installing sand and class 5, installing underdrainage, and planting the trees. Additional savings were captured through a reduction in professional design costs and the contingency line item. The Park Commission members thanked Scherer and showed their appreciation for providing substantial cost savings by completing sections of this project with city public works employees rather than hiring out the work. Gallup noted Medina’s Capital Improvement plan has budgeted approximately $100,000 each year for the next three years to begin updating Hunter Lions Park. The Park Commission discussed the phasing plan for Hunter Lions Park noting that phase one included reorienting the ballfield backstop to be able to begin phase two, which is the construction of the tennis and pickleball courts. There was a consensus to reorient the ballfield backstop if needed to be able to begin phase two, but to wait on the complete ballfield installation in phase one until the Hamel Athletic Club can provide some cost sharing. In the meantime, the field will be able to be used as a practice field. A motion was made by Jacob and seconded by Lee to recommend to the City Council the adoption of the Hunter Lions Master Plan and recommend beginning the implementation of phase two. A roll call vote was taken: Park Commissioner Mary Morrison - aye Park Commissioner Angela Bernhardt – aye Park Commissioner Steve Lee - aye Park Commissioner Nila Norman – aye Park Commissioner Troy Hutchinson – aye Park Commissioner John Jacob – aye Motion passed unanimously. 9) Staff Report • Hamel Athletic Club – Gallup reported that this item has been moved to the March Park Commission meeting. • Park Asset Inventory – Lee provided a brief update on the Park Asset Inventory and volunteered to provide a more detailed review at a future meeting. • General Items – Scherer noted a few City Council members requested the Park Commission look into adding hockey boards to Medina’s park amenities. Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT February 17, 2021 Page 4 of 4 10) Adjourn A motion was made by Morrison, seconded by Norman, to adjourn the meeting. A roll call vote was taken: Park Commissioner Mary Morrison - aye Park Commissioner Angela Bernhardt – aye Park Commissioner Steve Lee - aye Park Commissioner Nila Norman – aye Park Commissioner Troy Hutchinson – aye Park Commissioner John Jacob – aye Motion passed unanimously. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Minutes prepared by Jodi Gallup. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1 February 23, 2021 DRAFT 1 2 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL AND PARK COMMISSION CONCURRENT WORK 3 SESSION MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 23, 2021 4 5 The City Council and Park Commission of Medina, Minnesota met in work session on 6 February 23, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Martin presided. 7 8 Martin read a statement explaining that this meeting is being held in a virtual format 9 because of the ongoing pandemic. She provided instructions for public participation. 10 11 I. ROLL CALL 12 13 Council Members present: Albers, Cavanaugh, DesLauriers, Martin, and Reid. 14 15 Council Members absent: None. 16 17 Park Commission Members present: Bernhardt, Hutchinson, Jacob, Morrison, Sharp, 18 and Norman (arrived at 7:16 p.m.). 19 20 Park Commission Members absent: Lee. 21 22 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, Assistant City Administrator Jodi 23 Gallup, Finance Director Erin Barnhart, City Planning Director Dusty Finke, and Public 24 Works Director Steve Scherer 25 26 II. DIAMOND LAKE REGIONAL TRAIL 27 Martin commented that this meeting is a continuation of the joint worksession of the Park 28 Commission and City Council the previous week with Three Rivers Park District to 29 discuss the Diamond Lake Regional Trail. She stated that the meeting tonight should 30 focus on public comments with a meeting to follow the next week devoted to deliberation 31 by the Council and Park Commission. 32 33 Kelly Grissman, Three Rivers Park District, provided brief overview and background on 34 the Diamond Lake Regional Trail. She stated that they are looking to better define the 35 route for the trail in order to acquire property for the trail segments from willing sellers 36 and developers as it becomes available. She stated that this is envisioned as a 20-to-37 30-year process. She stated that a community has never regretted the recreational 38 amenity once the trail project is completed. She noted that circumstances change over 39 time and even the most reluctant property owner sometimes becomes a willing seller, 40 and this planning process allows the Park District to be prepared when those 41 opportunities arise. She provided a summary of some of the input that has been 42 received from the public thus far both in support and opposition. She stated that the 43 difference in feedback seems to be between the different areas of Medina and whether 44 the property owner would be impacted. She recognized that there are challenges in 45 developing a regional trail corridor and confirmed that there is still work to do in order to 46 provide a route that would best meet the desires of the public. She welcomed additional 47 input from the public related to the proposed route. 48 49 Stewart Crosby, SRF, stated that he is working with the Park District on the trail project 50 and provided a brief overview of the routes that have been reviewed and considered 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2 February 23, 2021 along with the preferred route through Medina. He noted that the trail would run a total 1 of 21 miles and travel through multiple communities. 2 3 Martin emphasized that the Council will not take any action in regard to a trail route but 4 will instead listen to input on the route and possible changes that would make the route 5 more palatable to residents. She thanked all residents that have submitted written 6 comments. She recognized the balance between providing recreational opportunities 7 with protecting the rural character of Medina and the privacy of its residents. 8 9 Neil Lapidus, 2200 Hollybush Road, commented that he is opposed to the regional trail 10 western route as it comes very close to his property. He stated that he has also had the 11 opportunity to reach five of the seven members of his neighborhood association and 12 those members are also strongly opposed to the western segment. He stated that the 13 property and privacy of the rural environment is important to the residents. He stated 14 that this would now suggest that be converted to a linear trail. He commented that it is 15 complicated to map out a linear trail and noted that unless there is abandoned property 16 there would be too much resistance without guarantee that it could be completed. He 17 commented that Baker Park has a complete trail system three miles from this location 18 and therefore he did not believe it to be a wise choice to select this location. He stated 19 that if the Park District and City are looking to enhance the park and trail system, they 20 should look to existing trails that could be further connected and enhanced. 21 22 Abdhish Bhavsar, 2105 Chestnut Road, stated that the preferred route seems to run 23 along his eastern property line that is currently shared with another family. He 24 commented that he was unsure how a trail 16 feet in width would not disrupt the existing 25 pastures. He did not think it would be fair to change horse trails into bike trails. He 26 stated that this alignment would dramatically change the rural character of very quiet 27 dead-end streets by significantly increasing traffic. He stated that this would also bring 28 trail users across the property of many families and impact those around the trail. He 29 asked that everyone consider that impact, even if it does not directly impact their 30 property. He noted that most residents moved to Medina because of the rural character 31 and would like to protect that right for private property to remain rural and private. 32 33 Martha Van de Ven, 1765 Medina Road, referenced the statement that this is a 30-year 34 vision noting that she has lived in Medina for 40 years. She stated that she feels that the 35 regional trail proposal south of Highway 55 should be no place other than along CR 19. 36 She stated that they do not need north/south bike routes through Medina every three 37 miles as that is a violation of the greenspace that Medina residents moved to Medina to 38 enjoy. She believed that the regional trail should be connected to the bike trail along CR 39 19 and could connect to the trail in Baker Park. She did not believe additional trails are 40 needed that close in proximity. She stated that she also submitted written comments via 41 email prior to the meeting. 42 43 Tim Healy, 1500 Tamarack, echoed the comments of the previous speaker in that 44 another route is not needed in Medina. He asked why additional funds would be spent 45 when there are trails and roads available to walk and bike. He did not think another trail 46 is needed and noted that he was concerned that if there is opposition to the west an 47 alternate route could impact other property owners. He commented that he was not 48 made aware of this meeting until eight days ago and asked if online comments would 49 still be accepted. 50 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3 February 23, 2021 Martin stated that there has been some confusion with the notices that were mailed but 1 believed that the notices have been comprehensive in the number of residents reached. 2 She commented that additional comments could be submitted in writing if something is 3 overlooked tonight. She noted that the Park Commission and City Council will be 4 holding an additional meeting to further discuss the matter but still would not be taking 5 formal action tonight. 6 7 Healy asked if the residents would be notified if the proposed route is changed. 8 9 Grissman replied that if there are additional changes or opportunities to better or more 10 thoroughly engage residents, the Park District would work hard to provide those 11 opportunities. 12 13 Martin commented that Medina staff also works hard to update the City website with that 14 information. 15 16 David Huart, representing Jack and Joanne Wahlfors, 1525 Deerhill Road, commented 17 that they were made aware of the project two days ago and listened to the February 16th 18 meeting online. He stated that the Wahlfors are in their upper 80s and are not 19 technologically savvy and therefore were not aware of the project. He stated that the 20 proposed route appears to enter their property in the northeast corner and take a 21 circuitous route through their parcel. He noted that the route would go through the berry 22 and pumpkin fields on the property. He stated that if the intention is to provide 23 connection, that could be done along Deerhill Road rather than dissecting this property. 24 He stated that the Wahlfors family has owned this property since the late 1800’s and 25 have many generations of labor invested in the property. He thanked Hellen Healy who 26 spoke at the last meeting expressing concern on part of the Wahlfors. He asked that 27 thought be given to the investment that the Wahlfors have made to their property and 28 whether the rights of the private property owners and natural resources are greater than 29 recreation. 30 31 Sara Welch, 1752 County Road 24, stated that in July she noticed a sign in Wayzata 32 that said help plan the next regional trail and were surprised to see a proposed 33 alignment that snaked through their private property. She stated that she and her 34 husband have no interest in another trail in the area. She agreed that the trail could be 35 routed to CR 19. She stated that her property was purchased for private use and not 36 public use, noting that the trail goes through 12 acres of their private land. She stated 37 that the vast majority of Medina residents are not interested in additional trails that go 38 through greenspace and hoped that the Mayor and Council support the desires of the 39 residents to protect Medina’s greenspace. 40 41 Robin Johnson stated that she is in a unique circumstance as she owns property on 42 Tamarack that is split between Orono and Medina. She stated that she currently 43 operates a nonprofit farm sanctuary, and the preferred route would go through both her 44 Medina and Orono properties. She stated that she is upset and anxious over this issue 45 and cannot believe that a route that goes through private property is being discussed. 46 She stated that she will not sell her property. She noted that she attended the Orono 47 Council meeting the previous night and that Council stated that they would not run the 48 trail through private property and said it will not consider that type of route. She stated 49 that like everyone before her, she is opposed. She asked when the meeting would be 50 held where the Council would say that this trail will not work. 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4 February 23, 2021 1 Martin stated that the Council and Park Commission will have a meeting the following 2 Tuesday, March 2nd to discuss the project and input received. She stated that a decision 3 may not be made but the members would be providing their views. 4 5 Robin Johnson asked why the Orono Council stated right away that their job is to 6 represent their residents and asked why Medina does not feel the same way. 7 8 Martin commented that the Council may feel in a similar manner, but they believe in 9 permitting residents the ability to provide their input. She commented that Orono tends 10 to follow a top-down communication style while Medina follows an open communication 11 style which is why they are providing the opportunity to listen to everyone. 12 13 Quinn Montgomery, 1815 Morgan Road, commented that the Park District talked about 14 this being a 30-year vision but noted that this would impact property values immediately. 15 He stated that many people have said that if they would have known about this trail, they 16 would not have purchased the property, and therefore if this alignment is out there it will 17 be difficult to sell properties impacted. He noted that one of the routes runs through their 18 property and it would be devastating and has stressed out his family. He stated that this 19 puts neighbor against neighbor, as moving the alignment simply shifts that burden to 20 other members of the community. He asked where the need for the trail comes from as 21 the previous presentation stated that most comments were in opposition of the trail. He 22 stated that it does not sound like there is much of a need for this solution. 23 24 Martin commented that there is a strong regional government in the metro area which 25 includes planning for communities to grow in a coordinated fashion. She noted that the 26 Metropolitan Council plans not only trails but other elements such as transit systems and 27 density requirements. She stated that Medina has been brought in because the Three 28 Rivers Park District would like to plan and collaborate with the cities it would like to place 29 routes, which is how this came to be. She stated that the Council is listening tonight and 30 not deciding anything. She thanked everyone for the comments they have provided 31 tonight as well as through email prior to tonight’s meeting. 32 33 T. Cody Turnquist, 2000 Chestnut Road, thanked the Park Commission and Council for 34 listening to the public input. He stated that his family has lived on the property for over 35 40 years, noting that he and his wife recently purchased the property from his parents 36 and hope to continue to raise their family on the property. He echoed the comments of 37 the previous speakers. He noted that the way they run their farm on their property would 38 be in jeopardy with this trail, as the trail would run adjacent to their horse fences and 39 across their hay fields. He stated that when people come to his property, he has to 40 educate them as to how to interact with livestock and he would not have the opportunity 41 to educate members of the public that would use a trail running through his property. He 42 commented that the aerial imagery is rather deceptive, noting that the trail segment on 43 his property is less than 2.5 miles from 2,500 acres of property owned by the Park 44 District. He encouraged the Park District to look at how the trail could be directed 45 through its own property. 46 47 Kirsten Chapman, 1575 and 1535 N Willow Drive, thanked the Council for opening up 48 this meeting to receive public input. She stated that she recently sold a property on 49 Iroquois that would have a segment run along the property. She sympathized with the 50 different areas within the City because the northern area is controlled development and 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5 February 23, 2021 the southern area is large rural lots. She was unsure that there would be a good way to 1 reconcile that difference. She stated that her biggest concern is the protection of 2 Wolsfeld Woods. She stated that as development increases, the rules of that natural 3 area are often violated. She commented that Wolsfeld Woods is one of the largest 4 scientific wooded areas in this region. She believed that Three Rivers Park could use 5 existing Medina trails to connect to other communities. She stated that she would not be 6 opposed to segments that would run along the roads, as the roads in the southern 7 portion of Medina are rural and would still provide that nature like feel. She suggested 8 that if this has to move forward, it should follow existing roads. She asked that this trail 9 stay away from Wolsfeld Woods, as an adjacent trail segment would encourage 10 pedestrians and cyclists to go into the woods. 11 12 Tim Sedabres, 3169 Cypress Circle S, thanked the Council and Commission for the time 13 they have put into listening and reading all of the comments. He stated that he hears the 14 concerns from those that do not want to disturb their personal property. He referenced 15 the population density on the east and north and stated that those residents like to walk, 16 and bike and it can be difficult to do on the shoulder of a road. He stated that residents 17 will benefit and use the trails. He stated that there is currently not a connection to the 18 Baker Park trails from the east. He stated that he would support either route and 19 believes that trail access would provide a benefit to the community. 20 21 Martin commented that persons in the more newly developed areas with younger 22 families have a greater desire for this type of trail. She stated that perhaps the trail could 23 run north of Highway 55 and stop around Highway 55. She recognized that people live 24 in different settings of the City and have different desires. 25 26 Minna Brooks, 4506 Oak Drive in Edina, stated that she is not a Medina resident and is 27 present in representation of the Brooks family that donated the land into conservancy for 28 Wolsfeld Woods. She stated that her family opposes this route because of the impact it 29 could have on the woods. She stated that she is sympathetic to the comments everyone 30 has made related to their emotions and property values. She commented that ultimately 31 conservation and natural preservation benefits everyone. She stated that she does not 32 understand why people are having to argue to save the Earth. She stated that Wolsfeld 33 Woods was donated with the purpose of protecting the land from development and is 34 designated as a scientific and natural area. She stated that her family is opposed to the 35 alignment that would run adjacent to the woods. 36 37 Bridget Anderson, 1512 Deerhill Road, stated that they moved here one year ago and 38 feel fortunate to have found this special place in the woods. She referenced the western 39 alignment and noted that they are opposed to that route. She stated that they are not 40 opposed to making bike trails and connections for people to visit the great area they 41 have found. She stated that regional trails bring a large number of users, noting that 42 projections are often three times lower than the actual number of users. She stated that 43 regional trails also bring cars and traffic that park on residential roads in order to access 44 trails. She commented that Three Rivers Park District builds great trails but that should 45 be done in the public right-of-way. She stated that if a trail must go through, it should 46 follow public right-of-way. She suggested the Council form a task force with 47 stakeholders, including impacted property owners, to continue to guide this process. 48 49 Rich Wallin, 2022 Medina Road, stated that they love Medina and sought this area for a 50 specific reason, the majesty and privacy of this area. He noted that this trail would run 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 6 February 23, 2021 adjacent to their seven acres of property. He stated that while they appreciate the 1 benefit trails provide to a community, they are opposed to this. He stated that increased 2 trail traffic would impact dogs, horses, and the rural character that residents moved to 3 this area to enjoy. He stated that they would support an alternate route but would not 4 support a route in places it was not meant to exist. He stated that some neighborhoods 5 would welcome a trail amenity while others oppose it and prefer their privacy. He 6 recognized that this is a challenging endeavor to find a route that pleases everyone but 7 commented that the south portion of Medina is home to many residents who moved 8 there to have privacy. He stated that this is a tough time, and the timing could not be 9 worse to impose additional anxiety. He asked the Council to shelve this and think of a 10 better time when the community could come together to find a reasonable solution. 11 12 Brian Luedtke, 2650 Bantle Farm Road, stated that he also represents his neighbors. 13 He stated that Three Rivers has not been clear in displaying this alternate route. He 14 commented that his neighbors would abut the trail segment and are concerned with the 15 disturbance to the wetland and wildlife. He stated that he moved to Medina to have a 16 large piece of property and does not want a bike path in his backyard or his neighbor’s 17 yard. He suggested that Three Rivers spend the time and money enhancing trails within 18 their own property. He stated that he has spoken with ten of the largest property owners 19 that are not willing to sell their property and are also willing to place a clause in the sale 20 of their property that trail easements not be provided. 21 22 Michael Fine, 550 Navajo Road, commented that he is incredibly encouraged by the 23 thoughtfulness and well-articulated arguments from the public. He stated that he is 24 proud to be a Medina resident. He applauded a previous comment where someone 25 stated that they are not just opposed to this alignment but the alternate alignments that 26 would run along private property. He agreed that this trail could run along CR 19. He 27 strongly urged there being further review of the 40 percent of comments in support made 28 online, noting that they may not be Medina residents. He understood that someone in 29 the Enclave would support this amenity as something nice to have but noted that the 30 other residents moved to Medina because they wanted large open spaces and do not 31 want this trail along their properties. He stated that there is something available to the 32 west and people can walk along roads, such as Medina Road, without fear of wellbeing 33 from vehicles. He believed a thoughtful route could be developed along public roads but 34 did not believe the western area was the right route. He stated that perhaps the 35 comments in support are coming from the higher density residential areas. He noted 36 that the rural Medina residents have already put up with the higher density residential 37 areas that have come forward. He stated that if there is an urgency to connect to other 38 communities in the north, that could be done along CR 19. 39 40 Angela Erickson stated that she represents many of the Hunter Drive residents which 41 would be impacted by the eastern route. She stated that they felt some relief after the 42 last call. She stated that they have joined together to keep the bike route out of Hunter 43 Drive but have realized that they should also join together with the other residents to 44 state that the trail is simply not wanted in the community. She stated that the Hunter 45 Drive residents do not want this in their neighborhood but also do not wish this on other 46 residents along other proposed routes. 47 48 Tim Schock representing his parents who live at 2075 Cottonwood Trail, commented 49 that he is disappointed to see what has been taking place through this process. He 50 stated that the recommended route was not even part of the original proposal prior to 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 7 February 23, 2021 February 16th. He stated that all the comments received prior to that time and the public 1 engagement had been focused on the original corridor, therefore tonight is the first 2 opportunity to comment on the recommended route itself. He noted that he has listened 3 to the October 28th and February 16th meetings. He stated that the goal has been stated 4 as a linear trail that goes through nature, noting that the first two routes were along 5 public roads and therefore that does not make sense. He stated that it seems those 6 routes were put out there in order to create a backlash on road-based routes in order to 7 bring this route forward. He noted that this route would go directly through the horse 8 pastures of his parents’ property. He noted that the path would not just take 16 feet but 9 would take the entire use of the land. He stated that his parents’ property is a world-10 renowned equine farm. He stated that the question seems to be how this could be done 11 rather than whether it should be done. He did not believe there has been proper 12 consideration of the risks to the private land. He stated that most of the people on the 13 call have been overwhelmingly opposed to this and hoped that the Council would take 14 that into consideration. 15 16 Neil Bhavsar, 2501 Chestnut Road, stated that he has grown up in Medina and as a 17 resident he is worried about the trail bringing in people that would otherwise not be in the 18 backyards of Medina residents. He stated that many Medina residents own livestock 19 and horses and having a large amount of traffic would disrupt those animals. He stated 20 that the safety of the animals should be a part of this discussion. 21 22 Rachelle Rossini stated that Three Rivers Park District has stated that this is decades 23 away so it does not need to be worried about but noted that it will impact property values 24 now. She stated that the Park District also stated that they do not work with unwilling 25 sellers but that does not mean that your neighbor may not sell. She stated that she does 26 not want this anywhere in Medina. She stated that it was commented that the western 27 route would only go through 14 properties, but the denser Enclave is more likely the area 28 that would support this. She commended the Orono Council for making a statement the 29 previous night that it would need a good reason to disrupt private property and this 30 would be a hard no. She stated that Medina has the right to say it does not want this. 31 She stated that she has not seen any property owner that would be impacted support 32 this project. 33 34 Jennifer Dobbs echoed the comments made thus far. She stated that she also 35 represents the other members of her family that own 72 contiguous acres along Morgan 36 Road. She stated that they are opposed to the recommended trail route due to the 37 invasion of their privacy, the disruption to wetlands and natural areas, and the threat to 38 privacy. She stated that there are trails in Baker Park and along CR 19 that could 39 instead be further developed. She stated that they have horses on their property, and 40 they are not used to interacting with strangers. She noted that it would be a safety 41 concern not only to the horses but the users of the trails. She referenced the planned 42 local trail identified with the green dotted line and asked what that would entail and how 43 it is related to the western route as those would be further disruptive to private property. 44 45 Finke stated that the City’s trail plan has a turf trail in the designated location northwest 46 of Morgan Road and was based on historic horse trails in the area. 47 48 Martin stated that this has been a wonderful dialogue and it has been great to hear 49 people express their concerns respectfully. She thanked everyone for their input noting 50 that the Council welcomes input from residents before making decisions. She stated 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 8 February 23, 2021 that the March 2nd worksession will be reserved for deliberations by the Park 1 Commission and City Council in light of the community input. She stated that additional 2 input could be provided in writing prior to that time but public input will not be gathered 3 during that meeting. 4 5 III. ADJOURN 6 Moved by Albers, seconded by Reid, to adjourn the meeting on behalf of the City 7 Council at 7:53 p.m. 8 9 A roll call vote was performed: 10 11 DesLauriers aye 12 Albers aye 13 Cavanaugh aye 14 Reid aye 15 Martin aye 16 17 Motion passed unanimously. 18 19 Moved by Jacob, seconded by Morrison, to adjourn the meeting on behalf of the Park 20 Commission at 7:54 p.m. 21 22 A roll call vote was performed: 23 24 Norman aye 25 Morrison aye 26 Sharp aye 27 Bernhardt aye 28 Lee absent 29 Jacob aye 30 Hutchinson aye 31 32 Motion passed unanimously. 33 34 35 36 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1 March 2, 2021 DRAFT 1 2 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL AND PARK COMMISSION CONCURRENT WORK 3 SESSION MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 2, 2021 4 5 The City Council and Park Commission of Medina, Minnesota met in work session on 6 March 2, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Martin presided. 7 8 Martin read a statement explaining that this meeting is being held in a virtual format 9 because of the ongoing pandemic and reviewed an overview for the intent of tonight’s 10 meeting. 11 12 I. ROLL CALL 13 14 Council Members present: Albers, Cavanaugh, DesLauriers, Martin, and Reid. 15 16 Council Members absent: None. 17 18 Park Commission Members present: Bernhardt, Jacob, Lee, Morrison, Norman, and 19 Sharp. 20 21 Park Commission Members absent: Hutchinson. 22 23 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, Assistant City Administrator Jodi 24 Gallup, Finance Director Erin Barnhart, City Planning Director Dusty Finke, Public Works 25 Director Steve Scherer, and Chief of Police Jason Nelson. 26 27 II. DIAMOND LAKE REGIONAL TRAIL 28 Martin commented that the City has received a great deal of public input on the potential 29 Three Rivers Park trail route through Medina for the Diamond Lake Regional Trail. She 30 noted that the Park District identified a preferred route and additional input was received 31 via input and the two previous meetings. She stated that she, Cavanaugh, and staff 32 have had continued discussions with Three Rivers Park District about a potential trail 33 route and the general concept of a trail. 34 35 Cavanaugh thanked Martin for her leadership throughout this process. He commented 36 that throughout this process staff has been in communication with the Park District and 37 stated that it has become clear throughout the process that residents in the south see 38 this trail as a violation of their privacy and the reason they moved to Medina. He 39 commented that there is more population to the north that see trails as an amenity and 40 with that in mind, they attempted to develop alternative options. He stated that there is a 41 portion of the trail that would be easy to get done, a portion that has potential and a 42 portion that would be unlikely. He believed that focus should be given to the portion that 43 could be done along Hamel Road north to Baker Park which would allow residents to 44 utilize the Baker Park trail system. He stated that perhaps some connections could be 45 made south to Hamel but acknowledged that would be trickier. 46 47 Martin advised that Cavanaugh is the liaison to the Park Commission and thus has taken 48 an active role in these discussions. She welcomed Three Rivers Park District to make a 49 brief presentation. 50 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2 March 2, 2021 Kelly Grissman, Three Rivers Park District, thanked the Mayor, Council and Park 1 Commission for their time and input throughout this process. She reviewed the goal of 2 the project and highlighted the evaluation considerations. She recognized the concern 3 for potential private impacts and the level of support the potential project would have or 4 not have. She reviewed the different options that have been developed to stay the 5 course to select a preferred route, explore an alternative route south of Hamel Road, or 6 utilize an alternative route and removing the study area south of Hamel Road. 7 8 Martin referenced option two noting that there has been concern with specifying a 9 regional trail study and appreciated that a particular trail is not shown in this area and it 10 would only be initiated by the City. She asked if having this undefined trail study area in 11 the City plans would permit the City to pursue opportunities to pursue dedication of trail 12 purposes through the use of park dedication funds as development opportunities may 13 arise. 14 15 Finke commented that he believed that it is true that if the study area is identified it 16 would provide justification to look for opportunities that may make sense if development 17 comes forward in the future. He noted that there are trail corridors that have been 18 identified by the City for the future as well. 19 20 Morrison commented that she is opposed to any plan that would take private property 21 and undercut the rural nature of Medina. She stated that Three Rivers Park has 22 mentioned only working with willing sellers but noted that some access points were 23 taken by imminent domain in the past by the Park District. She was not sure of the 24 benefits that would be created by designating a study area and was concerned that it 25 could create uncertainty with property values and for property owners. She stated that 26 Medina can pursue its own trail system outside of the Park District. She stated that she 27 would prefer option three, eliminating the area of interest. She stated that she would 28 support a safe crossing over Highway 55 for those residents in the northwest area. 29 30 Martin asked the benefits that would be provided by designating a regional trail study 31 area. 32 33 Grissman replied that designating a future regional trail study area would not have an 34 impact on property values as there are similar corridors throughout the county. She 35 explained that designating the study area would allow the City to be in a position to work 36 with the Park District at a future date, should the City request to do so, to construct trails 37 or grade separated corridors at that time. 38 39 Martin asked if the City would have that option regardless of whether the study area is 40 designated. 41 42 Grissman confirmed that the City would always have the option to reach out to the Park 43 District related to park and/or trail opportunities. She stated that if the regional trail is 44 removed from the applicable plans there would simply be a more extensive process to 45 add that back in with backing from the Metropolitan Council. She confirmed that could 46 be done at any time, it would simply be an additional step. 47 48 Martin commented that the City has its own trail corridor goals in its Comprehensive 49 Plan. 50 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3 March 2, 2021 Finke confirmed that the City does have future trails in its Comprehensive Plan. He 1 noted that if there was a subdivision or land use change within the search area it would 2 call that out from a different perspective and would make it more likely for the City to 3 review trail opportunities in the planning process. 4 5 Sharp stated that it would behoove the City to look at option two as it would not commit 6 the City to anything but would provide an easier partnership if the opportunity presents 7 itself 20 years down the road. 8 9 Martin commented that she believes a partnership would be available whether or not the 10 area is designated on the map. 11 12 Bernhardt commented that residents stated that if their land is part of the regional trail 13 study area, they would be concerned that could impact future property values and asked 14 if that would have to be disclosed at the time of sale. 15 16 Martin commented that would be a legal opinion and dependent upon the disclosures 17 that are necessary. 18 19 Bernhardt stated that she would prefer option three, recognizing that it may add an 20 additional step if a regional trail is desired in the future. 21 22 Lee thanked the Council and staff noting that this process has been wonderful to receive 23 public input. He stated that if Hamel Road would be a new preferred path, he would 24 want the City seek comments on that before making it the preferred route. 25 26 Martin commented the question is whether the Park District should explore that potential 27 route which would begin a new process to solicit public input on that route. 28 29 Lee stated that he would be in support of exploring additional options. He stated that he 30 would favor removing the future regional trail study area as it creates an unnecessary 31 flag for residents that do not want that amenity. He stated that he would select option 32 three. 33 34 Martin asked for input from Three Rivers Park District as to whether additional public 35 input would be solicited should the group select option two or three. 36 37 Grissman commented that they would most likely focus on the Hamel Road corridor in 38 the next year or so as that has been identified in the Lake Sara Regional Trail system. 39 She stated that the Park District would focus on the area north that connects to Corcoran 40 in the immediate future, should that be the direction. 41 42 Jacob asked if there would be financial implications between options two and three and 43 what those would be. He asked why the crossing of Highway 55 would go away if the 44 City selects option three. 45 46 Grissman clarified that option three would still work on everything north of Hamel Road, 47 therefore the Park District would still be the lead agency in determining where to cross 48 Highway 55 and gathering funding for that. She stated that option three would simply 49 remove the Park District from being a partner on trails south of Highway 55. 50 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4 March 2, 2021 Reid commented that she likes option two or three, using the roadways as trail 1 opportunities to connect more people. She referenced the County property noting that 2 could be kept in the plans as the property adjacent has come forward in the past for 3 development which could create an opportunity for an off-road section from Arrowhead 4 Road through the County and Delcroft properties to Hamel Road. She believed that 5 segment could be left on the map as there may be an opportunity in the near future. 6 She stated that the trail segment could be used in negotiations for that development 7 when it eventually comes back. 8 9 Finke agreed that would be a fair idea. He noted that any large property that would be 10 subdividable would provide opportunity for an off-road trail and get closer to the Park 11 District’s vision. 12 13 Cavanaugh commented that it may be a good time to display an alternative that he 14 worked with Finke to develop. 15 16 Reid asked where Diamond Lake is located. 17 18 Grissman commented that Diamond Lake is north between the borders of Rogers and 19 Dayton. 20 21 Cavanaugh commented that providing a safe crossing across Highway 55 would be 22 helpful for the residents in that area as it is difficult and dangerous to cross with children. 23 He displayed a proposed trail alignment that would run from the Corcoran connection, 24 through Weston Woods, cross Highway 55 with an overpass to the Hennepin County 25 site, and then connecting with Hamel Road. He noted that would provide a lot of access 26 north and south for all residents. He commented that this would be a huge benefit to 27 Medina and its residents as it would not be a cost to residents. He commented that 28 option two leaves possibilities to do more, noting that it would be nice to provide access 29 to Enclave residents. He stated that perhaps there are also opportunities to connect to 30 other existing trails or use Medina Road to connect to 101. He commented that he does 31 not necessarily support those but would like to leave it open to study. He stated that he 32 respects privacy rights and the reasons people moved to Medina, which is why he 33 believes additional study should be done. 34 35 Albers asked if there would be another option to just say no to the trail all together. He 36 stated that Orono made the decision to not provide the connection for the regional trail, 37 but that option was not included tonight. He stated that of the three options presented 38 tonight, the only reason he would choose option two would be from a planning 39 perspective. He noted that if the MUSA line changed and properties became 40 developable, the regional trail would then be part of the planning process but if the study 41 area is not there it would not necessarily be part of the planning process. 42 43 Martin agreed that an option four, to say no to the trail could be added. 44 45 Albers stated that from a planning perspective he would favor option three. 46 47 Martin commented that would give the City the option to gather input from residents on 48 Hamel Road and property owners in the option for considerations areas north and south 49 of Highway 55. 50 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5 March 2, 2021 DesLauriers asked who would be responsible for trail maintenance once the trail is 1 constructed. 2 3 Grissman commented that as a regional trail, Three Rivers Park District would hold the 4 responsibility for acquisition, design, construction, operations, and maintenance. She 5 stated that they do look for partners, but the Park District would be the lead agency for 6 that work and investment. 7 8 DesLauriers commented that part of the vision of Medina is to preserve its rural 9 character and was unsure that these options live up to that vision. He stated that he 10 would favor opposing the trail all together as in option four. He stated that perhaps he 11 could support option three but noted that simply moves the problem to Hamel Road 12 which already has issues with vehicles and horses. He stated that the trail segment 13 could come from Corcoran, down 50, to 19, to Baker Park. 14 15 Martin noted that would lack access to the neighborhoods to the north and the middle of 16 Medina. She stated that she would not want to miss opportunities that could perhaps be 17 palatable to residents. She recognized that the Park District stated that the initial focus 18 would be for the trail segment north of Highway 55 and south of Highway 55 to get to 19 Hamel Road, which the Hamel Road segment to be studied later. She stated that even 20 though there may be opposition from those along Hamel Road, perhaps that portion is 21 not built out, but they could still look at pursuing an opportunity to connect residents from 22 the north to Baker Park to use those trails. 23 24 Johnson stated that staff was looking for direction from the Council and Park 25 Commission. He stated that if the two groups are not ready to do so, they could allow 26 additional time for the Park Commission to review the topic and bring forward a 27 recommendation to the Council. 28 29 Martin commented that a fifth option could then be added which would provide more 30 time to think about this. 31 32 Norman commented that she would select option four but would like to leave open the 33 option to the north and therefore would select option three. 34 35 Morrison stated that she could support option three as that would leave the option to 36 cross Highway 55 but recognized that her vote may change to option four. 37 38 Bernhardt stated that she also likes option three as it provides an option to cross 39 Highway 55. 40 41 Jacob commented that he would support option three or option five as that would allow 42 additional time for review. 43 44 Sharp commented that he would support option three or option five. 45 46 Martin commented that there seems to be consensus of option three from the Park 47 Commission with the understanding that it is not a commitment to a trail but the option to 48 evaluate a trail and crossing of Highway 55. 49 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 6 March 2, 2021 Reid commented that she would be comfortable with option two or three. She stated 1 that the regional trail study area is vague and should not impact properties but 2 acknowledged that it may not be needed. She stated that perhaps the topic should go 3 back to the Park Commission for further discussion, which would be option five. 4 5 Cavanaugh stated that his first option would be for option two as he would be interested 6 to connect the population centers near Hamel. He stated that he could also support 7 option three. He stated that there is a window of opportunity with Weston Woods and 8 therefore that should be considered. 9 10 Albers stated that he would select option five to continue the discussions. He believed 11 that option three would commit the City to Hamel Road and believed additional 12 discussions would be needed. He agreed that the residents along Hamel Road would 13 not want more than exists today along their properties. 14 15 DesLauriers commented that he would select option five to further understand. He 16 stated that his second preference would be option four. He stated that he would stay 17 away from option three because if you put a map out that shows Hamel Road, residents 18 will notice that first. 19 20 Martin commented that it appears the Council would support additional review by the 21 Park Commission and therefore agreed that this should go back to the Park Commission 22 for additional review and discussion. She stated that the Council will wait for that input 23 before further evaluating the options. 24 25 Reid agreed that there would be opportunity within Weston Woods and believed the 26 Park Commission should review that alternative. 27 28 III. ADJOURN 29 30 Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers, to adjourn the meeting on behalf of the City 31 Council at 7:03 p.m. 32 33 A roll call vote was performed: 34 DesLauriers aye 35 Albers aye 36 Cavanaugh aye 37 Reid aye 38 Martin aye 39 40 Motion passed unanimously. 41 42 Moved by Jacob, seconded by Sharp, to adjourn the meeting on behalf of the Park 43 Commission at 7:04 p.m. 44 45 A roll call vote was performed: 46 Norman aye 47 Morrison aye 48 Sharp aye 49 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 7 March 2, 2021 Bernhardt aye 1 Lee aye 2 Jacob aye 3 Hutchinson absent 4 5 Motion passed unanimously. 6 7 8 Diamond Lake Regional Trail Page 1 of 2 March 16, 2021 Long Term Master Plan City Council Meeting MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Martin, Members of the City Council, and Park Commission FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: March 11, 2021 MEETING: March 17, 2021 Park Commission Meeting SUBJ: Diamond Lake Regional Trail Master Plan Background The City Council and Park Commission has reviewed the public engagement related to a long- term master plan for Three Rivers Park District’s Diamond Lake Regional Trail (DLRT) at the February 16, February 23, and March 2 work sessions. The City received a significant number of comments raising concerns with alternatives through the southern portion of the City. There was also feedback that a regional trail would be more appropriate in the more densely populated area of Medina and a suggestion to connect the DLRT to existing trails in Baker Park. The feedback from Park Commissioners and City Council members was to conduct additional engagement on potential route alternatives which could provide a regional trail from the northern city boundary, providing an opportunity for a grade-separated crossing of Highway 55, to approximately Hamel Road, and from there west to Baker Park. Staff has discussed a potential schedule for additional public engagement, which is presented below. In consideration of residents’ concerns for any regional trail within the City, Park District staff has requested that the City Council and Park Commission confirm the City’s desire to move forward with additional regional trail planning efforts within the northern portion of the City and, if interested in proceeding, to authorize the general conceptual routes for consideration before additional engagement and evaluation occurs. If the City Council and Park Commission would prefer to not move forward with any additional regional trail planning efforts at this time, the Park District is comfortable identifying and evaluating alternative routes outside of Medina. Potential Public Engagement Schedule The engagement would include access to an online activity throughout. Staff would advertise the process in the April City newsletter, provide a direct mailing to owners within a distance of 350 feet (1000 feet in rural) from the alternatives, connect with neighborhood groups near the alternative routes, and post information on the City’s website and social media sites. City and District staff are finalizing dates for virtual meetings and open house events, but have tentatively planned the following public engagement schedule. Diamond Lake Regional Trail Page 2 of 2 March 16, 2021 Long Term Master Plan City Council Meeting • March 16, 2021 – confirm Council interest to proceed with master plan engagement • March 17, 2021 – Park Commission • March 22- May 2 (6 weeks) – Public Engagement o Online Engagement (interactive map, email, project information) o 2-3 Virtual Meetings (focused on adjacent property owners but open to all) o 1-2 Outdoor Open Houses o 1-3 Pop-ups in Parks • May 19, 2021 – Park Commission review • June 1, 2021 – City Council review/approval Staff Recommendation Staff recommends proceeding with evaluating the routes identified on the attached map and proceeding with public engagement on the DLRT master plan as described. Attachment Maps showing potential alternative routes Map with potential alternative routes overlayed on City Trail Plan CHIPPEWA O MAPLE Potential DLRT Routes in Medina for additional engagement consideration COUNTY. ROAD 24 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles 1 I 1 CATES RANCH HAMEL A Q CHESTNUT'. r3, 014\ . Cr' �2 ASTER p00 9. SHAw�,E E' c� F°A-a WOODS �,,o Fq,�s RRy SUNSET `T,° '';' w c 0 0 Q 0 0 O Q w Z il Fir_ ToW 70 t G HARMONY ThreeRivers PARK DISTRICT Baker Park Reserve ea ad 24 Blackfoot Trl Tamarack Dr tiZs 0 0 0 Sh ore Jubert Trl Hamel Rd Navajo Rd W Cilium TN Clydesdale -0 Medina Rd Three Rivers Parloigistrict, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, Intermap, NGA, USGS Hamel Martina 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles Potential DLRT Routes in Medina for additional engagement consideration N 1�- ThreeRivers PARK DISTRICT HIGH W A Y 5 5 ")55 ")24 ")19 ")101 ")116 ")11 ")24 ")19 £¤12 HAMEL RD MEDINA R D PIO N E E R T R L TA M A R A C K D R WI L L O W D R HACKAMORE RD AR R O W H E A D D R H O M E S T E A D T R L CHIPPEWA RD HU N T E R D R PA R K V I E W D R BR O C K T O N L N N MEANDER RD EVERGREEN RD BR O C K T O N L N N CHIPPEWA RD WIL L O W D R WI L L O W D R HU N T E R D R ")55 Medina Golf & Country Club Spring Hill Golf Club Baker Park Reserve Baker Park Reserve Wolsfeld Woods (SNA)23 3 15 3 20A 20B 5 17 18 21A 16 9 19 19 4 22 21 B 1 8 11 18 19 8 14 513 12 7 66 2 1 10 Katrina Independence School Mooney Spurzem Holy Name Peter Wolsfeld Half Moon Krieg Miller Thies Ardmore Map Date: June 13, 2019 Scale: 1:32,000[0 0.5 10.25 Mile 2019 TrailMaster Plan Location of proposed trail segments are intended to identify connections and cooridors, not exact locations. Legend Surface Type Existing Paved Trail Existing Shoulder Trail Existing Turf Trail Existing Sidewalk Proposed Paved Trail Proposed Shoulder Trail Proposed Turf Trail Future Park Search Area Parks Existing Park Potential Park Expansion Existing or Planned Residential Unit Regional Trail Search Corridor Diamond Lake alternatives Hamel Athletic Club Park  Commission Meeting March 2021 Agenda •Hamel Athletic  Club (HAC) Update •2020 Improvements •2021 Enrollment Update •Vision •Fortin Lights Grant 2020 Improvements •Park  Commission approved: •Conversion of Quad 1 to a Little League field (grass/mound) •Creation of mini‐fields in the outfield between the old and new fences w/ag  lime •City Council approved Quad 1 conversion, delayed mini‐fields •Landscaping company completed majority of work in November 2020 •Minor touch‐ups in Spring 2021 2021 Enrollment •540 kids enrolled •Utilizing the space between Quad 1 and Quad 4 fields again for  tee‐ball and  coach pitch •Allows the larger grass field by the hill to remain usable for non‐baseball activities •New scheduling strategies to alleviate parking •Majors/Minors programs starting practices at the batting cages and will occasionally  use Fortin Field •Force use of Fortin and Farmers  Bank parking for  these events •Tee ‐ball and Coach Pitch will have 30 min. passing time between sessions HAC Programming •HAC averages 550 baseball participants a year  and uses every City of  Medina field at both Legion Park  and Hunter Lions •HAC generates approximately 14,500 park visits over the spring/summer  between players and families •Differentiate from other leagues based on our (mostly) M‐Th cabin  friendly schedule •Have always fielded 4‐12 year olds, occasionally 13‐16 year olds HAC Vision •To  maintain a community‐based youth baseball program for  youth pre‐K  through high school •Permanently expand to 4‐18 year olds (through high school) •Increased use of Fortin field for 14‐18 year olds •To  provide a cabin‐friendly schedule with minimal weekend activities •To  foster  a community by honoring play‐with requests, maintaining  coaching/teams year‐over‐year, and centralizing play at Hamel Legion Park •To  encourage new kids to enter the program at all ages, from 4‐18 •To  develop all kids regardless of their skill •To  provide competitive opportunities for  kids seeking additional baseball •Consider options to expand beyond baseball to other activities Fortin  Field •Field is currently underutilized ‐less than 1 scheduled event per week •Games require  2.5 hours, without lights, Hamel Hawks have difficulty  hosting games •Hamel Hawks games are typically on weekends to allow games  during the day •Visiting teams have difficulty arriving at the field at 4:30pm on a weeknight to  warm‐up so they can get a game in before dusk •The addition of lights will allow the field to be used on weeknights  and allow for  multiple practices/games per night vs. a single event HAC Fortin  Field Vision •To  develop a destination for  baseball  players and fans •To  increase the traffic to Hamel –attract  additional businesses •Host a 100 year  celebration including a  2026 townball state  tournament •Step 1: Add Lights (Grant details to  follow) •Step 2: Add Seating and Amenities Hennepin County Grant Details •Grant has been applied for  several times by Medina/HAC, the most  recent being in 2012 •Successfully advocated with Hennepin County to receive grant in  2020 •Grant was awarded and must be used within 18 months* *paperwork to the city from the county pending Hennepin County Grant Details Lighting Quote Opportunity to reduce  the price by ~$30k  working with a former  Musco sales employee,  Craig Gallop Project Funding •HAC has partnered with the city over the past several decades, including donating over  $228,000 in the last 10 years. •HAC has obtained over $293,490 in outside grant funds for  City of Medina. •2018: LED lights added to Legion Park  Lighted field: •HAC/Medina obtained grant funding to cover 1/3 the of the project ($50k).  •HAC covered remaining 33% ($50k) and Medina covered 33% ($50k). •HAC proposes a similar arrangement for the 2020 Grant •Grant: ~$148k •HAC and City of Medina split the remainder of the project (each paying about 25% of the project  total = $75k each). •HAC has arranged to finance its portion from Farmers State Bank of Hamel. Thank You! TO: Medina Park Commission FROM: Jodi Gallup, Assistant City Administrator DATE: March 12, 2021 RE: Park Funding The City utilizes two main revenue sources to fund parks and trails: 1) Park Dedication Fund & 2) Municipal Park Fund, which are described below. These funds must maintain sufficient balances to account for all future park and trail planning including new park amenities, land acquisitions, and replacement costs for existing parks. The Capital Improvement Plan (attached) helps the City budget out the next five years of spending for each of these funds. The Park Commission’s Park Asset Inventory looks at the life of each asset in our parks to help us budget out long term needs. Park Dedication Fund The Park Dedication Fund is to be used by the City Council as they see the need for new park projects, outside of expenditures within the General Fund. Park Dedication funds are needed for new park development, which is the intended use of Park Dedication funds, as mandated by state statute. Park Dedication Fund projects are presented through the Capital Improvement Plan. Revenues are generated from Park Dedication Fees charged on new developments. According to the current Comprehensive Plan, when the entire city is built out, the City will have received approximately $14.7 million dollars in Park Dedication funds, but all the planned infrastructures would cost roughly $18.5 million dollars. This will happen over the next 20 to 30 years. Current Park Dedication Fund Balance: $1,669,214.67 Municipal Park Fund The Municipal Park Fund is to be used by the City Council as they see the need for park projects and maintenance outside of expenditures within the General Fund and Park Dedication Fund. Municipal Park Fund projects are primarily the replacement of existing park equipment and structures that do not qualify for the Park Dedication Fund. Projects and replacements are presented through the Capital Improvement Plan. Revenues are generated by taxes, grants and donations from individuals, businesses and organizations. In 2019, discussions and planning took place amongst staff, City Council, Park Commission and community outreach to establish a 30-year replacement plan. A levy implementation was passed for 2020 and onward to fund ongoing replacements. The current levy contribution into this fund is $112,000 annually. Current Municipal Park Fund Balance: $379,193.91 MEMORANDUM 2021 CIP: DEPARTMENT Project Cost City Proposed Portion Project Cost City Proposed Portion Project Cost City Proposed Portion Project Cost City Proposed Portion Project Cost City Proposed Portion Potential Revenue Source Roads 1 Tamarack North of Medina to Blackfoot Overlay 54,000$ 43,200$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 2 Tamarack - Medina to 24 - Overlay 49,985$ 39,988$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 3 Tamarack City Limits to CSAH 24 Overlay 77,675$ 62,140$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 4 Tamarack Drive/Highway 55 Interesection Road Fund / Assessments / Bonds / Developer 5 Clydesdale trail overlay 600/101 150,000$ 75,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 6 Oakview Road - Overlay 43,000$ 21,500$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 7 Deer Hill Road East - Overlay 27,000$ 23,500$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 8 Dusty Trail - Overlay 4,000$ 2,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 9 Tower Dr West Overlay/curb 45,000$ 22,500$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 10 Chestnut Road - Overlay 50,000$ 25,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 11 Town Line Rd South 100,000$ 100,000$ Assessment Escrow Fund 12 Foxberry Farms Overlay/10% curb 283,000$ 142,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 13 Hackamore Medina/ Portion 700,000$ 700,000$ To be negotiated Medina/corcoran/County 14 Willow Drive North to 24 - reclaim 370,000$ 300,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 15 Shire Dr Overlay 32,000$ 16,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 16 Iroquois Drive Overlay 30,000$ 15,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 17 Maplewood Drive Overlay 29,328$ 14,664$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 18 Bobolink Road Overlay 90,000$ 45,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 19 Morningside Road Overlay 110,000$ 55,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 20 Elsinore Circle N of Morningside Rd Overlay 20,000$ 10,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 21 Arrowhead Interesection Upgrade 800,000$ 480,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments 22 Roads Sub-total 877,000$ 518,500$ 1,313,000$ 1,121,500$ 557,000$ 295,200$ 129,328$ 114,664$ 188,660$ 142,628$ 23 24 Public Works 25 Tandem 230,000$ 230,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 26 Water Truck / Tanker Replacement 20,000$ 20,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 27 Air Compressor Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 28 Ditch Mower Replacement/Loretto Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 29 Backhoe Replacement Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 30 Skid Steer Upgrade w/ Bucket/Harly Rake 12,000$ 12,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 12,000$ 12,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 31 Single Axle Truck 220,000$ 220,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 32 Public Works Sub-total 12,000$ 12,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 244,000$ 244,000$ 242,000$ 242,000$ -$ -$ 33 34 Police 35 PD Squad Cars 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 126,000$ 126,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 36 Traffic Squad 35,000$ 35,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 37 PD Squad Camera / Body Cams 100,000$ 100,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 38 Portable Radios 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ DWI Forfeiture Fund/Cap Equip 39 Squad Radios DWI Forfeiture Fund/Cap Equip 40 Policy and Procdure (Lexipol) 10,000$ 10,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 41 Police Security Cameras / Building / Interview Rooms 30,000$ 30,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 42 Records Management 70,000$ 70,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 43 Miscellaneous 8,000$ 8,000$ 8,000$ 8,000$ DWI Forfeiture Fund/Cap Equip 44 Police Sub-total 189,000$ 189,000$ 157,000$ 157,000$ 145,000$ 145,000$ 134,000$ 134,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 45 46 Fire 47 HAMEL 48 Ongoing PPE Replacement 10,000$ 10,000$ 12,000$ 12,000$ 12,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 49 Command Vehicle Replacement 4,320$ 4,320$ 4,320$ 4,320$ 4,320$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 50 Engine 11 Refurbishment 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 51 Pumper/Tanker 38,917$ 38,917$ 38,917$ 38,917$ 38,917$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 52 **Annual Contract - Exp 12/31/2022 75,000$ 75,000$ 77,000$ 77,000$ 77,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 53 Hamel Fire Sub-total 73,237$ 75,000$ 73,237$ 75,000$ 75,237$ 77,000$ 75,237$ 77,000$ 75,237$ 77,000$ 54 55 Loretto & Long Lake 56 Fire (Loretto) - Exp 12/31/21 22,999$ 28,290$ 28,290$ 28,290$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 57 Fire (Long Lake) - Exp 12/31/2025 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 58 Fire Sub-total -$ 28,999$ -$ 34,290$ -$ 34,290$ -$ 34,290$ -$ -$ 59 60 Emergency Management 61 Siren Maintenance 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 62 Civil Defense Sirens 30,000$ 30,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund 63 Civil Defense Sub-total 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 37,500$ 37,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 64 65 66 Administration/Data Processing 67 Vehicle Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund 68 Administration Sub-total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 69 70 City Buildings 71 City Hall Repairs/Renovation 10,000$ 10,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund 72 Community Building Repairs 15,000$ 15,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund 73 PW/Police Repairs/Renovations 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund 74 City Buildings - Parking Lot 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund 75 City Building Sub-total 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 76 77 78 79 Water (high growth expectation) 80 Water Treatment Plant Expansion 1,400,000$ 1,400,000$ Future - Water Capital 81 SCADA Software 22,000$ 22,000$ Water Utility Fund 82 Media Replacement Filtration 100,000$ 100,000$ Water Utility Fund 83 Chippewa Watermain Extension - Arrowhead to Mohawk 400,000$ 400,000$ Water Capital Improvement 84 Chippewa West of Mohawk 435,000$ 435,000$ Water Capital Improvement 2021 - 2025 Capital Improvement Plan 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 1 2021 CIP: DEPARTMENT Project Cost City Proposed Portion Project Cost City Proposed Portion Project Cost City Proposed Portion Project Cost City Proposed Portion Project Cost City Proposed Portion Potential Revenue Source 2021 - 2025 Capital Improvement Plan 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 85 Water Tower (and land acquisition)2,600,000$ 2,600,000$ Future Water Cap (2020-2023) 86 Water Sub-total 957,000$ 957,000$ -$ -$ 1,400,000$ 1,400,000$ -$ -$ 2,600,000$ 2,600,000$ 87 88 Sewer 89 Willow Dr Lift Station 700,000$ 700,000$ Sewer Capital Fund 90 I / I Maintenance 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ Sewer Capital Fund 91 Hunter/Hamel Rd Upsize 750,000$ 750,000$ Sewer Capital Fund 92 Sewer Sub-total 800,000$ 800,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ 750,000$ 750,000$ -$ -$ 93 94 Storm Water 95 Wolsfeld Ravine 100,000$ 25,000$ 200,000$ 50,000$ Storm Water Fund/Grants/MCWD 96 Storm Water Sub-total 100,000$ 25,000$ 200,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 97 98 Municipal Park Replacements 99 Trails 100 Annual Trail Replacement 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ Municipal Park Fund 101 Hamel Legion Park 102 Holy Name Park 103 Hunter Lions Park 104 Full Park Reconstruction/Tennis Court 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ Municipal Park Fund/Grants/Donations 105 Lakeshore Park 106 Redesign/Large Playground Equipment 100,000$ 100,000$ Municipal Park Fund 107 Rainwater Nature Area 108 Maple Park 109 Walnut Park 110 Medina Morningside Park 111 Playground curb/rubber under swings Municipal Park Fund 112 Replace baseball backstop Municipal Park Fund 113 Parking Area 10,000$ 10,000$ Municipal Park Fund 114 Medina Lake Preserve 115 Park Clean-up 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ Municipal Park Fund 116 Tomann Preserve - Park Development 117 The Park at Fields of Medina 118 285,000$ 235,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 155,000$ 155,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 119 120 New Park Development 121 Trails 122 Arrowhead Tr Connection 55 - Meander/Signal 60,000$ 60,000$ Park Dedication Fund 123 Arrowhead Trail Connection RR-Loram 80,000$ 80,000$ Park Dedication Fund 124 Hackamore Trail 230,000$ 115,000$ 263,000$ 131,000$ Park Ded/Cost Share w/ Corcoran 125 Medina Road Trail 200,000$ 200,000$ Park Dedication Fund 126 Medina Lake Preserve 127 Trail Head 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ Park Dedication Fund 128 Park Land by Medina Golf & CC 250,000$ 250,000$ Park Dedication Fund 129 Sioux Dr./HWY 55 Ped Crossing Future Study 130 Land Acquisitions / New Trails (rolling-used as development occurs)250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ Park Dedication Fund 131 Parks Sub-total 820,000$ 705,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 538,000$ 406,000$ 275,000$ 275,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 132 133 TOTAL:4,175,737$ 3,607,999$ 2,284,737$ 1,979,290$ 3,176,737$ 2,818,990$ 1,753,065$ 1,774,454$ 3,536,397$ 3,492,128$ 2