Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
04.05.2022 City Council Meeting Packet
Posted 3/31/2022 Page 1 of 1 AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 5, 2022 7:00 P.M. Meeting to be held telephonically/virtually pursuant Minn. Stat. Sec. 13D.021 I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of the March 15, 2022 Work Session B. Minutes of the March 15, 2022 Regular Council Meeting V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Resolution of Support for the People of Ukraine B. Approve Resolution Authorizing Closure and Transfer of Debt Service Funds C. Approve 2022 Road Materials and Equipment Bid D. Approve Uptown Hamel Market Analysis and Redevelopment Feasibility Study Request for Proposals VI. COMMENTS A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda B. Park Commission C. Planning Commission VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Hamel Athletic Club - Fortin Field Scoreboard B. Cates Industrial Park - Jeff and Chris Cates - Comprehensive Plan Amendment C. Weston Woods - Mark and Kathleen Smith - Amended PUD and Plat D. Loram and Scannell Medina Industrial - Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) - Proposed Commercial/Industrial Development 1. Resolution Approving the Response to Comments, Findings of Fact, and Record of Decision for the Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial EAW and Making a Negative Declaration Regarding the need for an EIS E. Landform on Behalf of McDonald’s - 822 Hwy 55 - Conditional Use Permit Amendment VIII. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT IX. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS X. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS XI. ADJOURN Telephonic/Virtual Meeting Call-in Instructions Join via Microsoft Teams to view presentations at this link: https://medinamn.us/council/ For audio only: +1 612-517-3122 Enter Conference ID: 156 623 767# MEMORANDUM TO: Medina Mayor and City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: March 30, 2022 DATE OF MEETING: April 5, 2022 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report Telephonic/Virtual Meeting Call-in Instructions Join via Microsoft Teams to view presentations at this link: https://medinamn.us/council/ For audio only: Dial +1 612-517-3122; Enter Conference ID: 156 623 767# V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Resolution of Support for the People of Ukraine –Staff drafted the attached resolution consistent with the direction from the March 15, 2022, City Council Meeting. Staff recommends approval. See attached resolution. B. Approve Resolution Authorizing Closure and Transfer of Debt Service Funds – Staff drafted the attached resolution due to these bonds being paid in full by Medina. The resolution would transfer any remaining balance after final payment to the Road Improvement Fund and TIF I-9 Fund. Staff recommends approval. See attached resolution. C. Approve 2022 Road Materials and Equipment Bid – Public Works Director Steve Scherer has attached a memo that outlines the various bids that we received to provide road maintenance improvements in the City. Staff recommends approval of the road material and equipment bids as presented. See attached memo and bid tabulation. D. Approve Uptown Hamel Market Analysis and Redevelopment Feasibility Study Request for Proposals – In the Fall of 2021, the City of Medina was awarded a grant from Hennepin County through their Housing & Economic Development Corridor Planning program due to the great work of Planning Director Dusty Finke. The grant is for a maximum of $25,000 from Hennepin County and requires at least a 25% match (minimum of $6250 if the full grant is utilized) from the City. The grant was intended to be used to fund a request for proposals (RFP) for economic development consulting services. The intent of the project is to receive guidance from a firm with successful 2 experience in economic development to create an actionable plan for how the City and property owners can encourage and support development. The plan will be based on current and projected market conditions, previous community visioning sessions, conversations with business and property owners, and existing development. Staff recommends approval. See attached request for proposals. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Hamel Athletic Club – Fortin Field Scoreboard – The Hamel Athletic Club (HAC) and Hamel Hawks have requested permission from the City to install a new digital screen and scoreboard at Paul Fortin Field at Hamel Legion Park. Funding for the cost of the display and scoreboard is being provided by Hamel Lions and the City Council would need to accept the donation by formal resolution. HAC is requesting the City pay for the electrical work, up to $5000. After much discussion, the Park Commission decided against the recommendation to fund $5000, due to other park projects which are currently in process. Potential Motion: Motion to accept the proposal to install a new scoreboard at Paul Fortin Field without the $5,000 requested funding. B. Cates Industrial – Jeff and Chris Cates – Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Jeff and Chris Cates have requested a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Concept Plan Review for development of approximately 665,000 square feet of warehouse/light industrial/office buildings on approximately 70 acres east of Willow Drive, north of Chippewa Road. Potential Action: If the City Council believes the proposed amendment is appropriate and finds that it is consistent with the goals, principles, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, the following action could be taken: Move to direct staff to prepare resolution granting conditional approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, subject to the conditions noted in the staff report. If the Council does not find that the proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, principles, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, the following action could be taken: Move to direct staff to prepare resolution denying the Comprehensive Plan Amendment based upon the findings described by Council. 3 C. Weston Woods – Mark and Kathleen Smith – Amended PUD and Plat - Mark and Kathleen Smith have requested an amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Plat for Weston Woods of Medina. The applicant proposes the following primary changes: 1) Change 10 twin-home lots to 9 detached villa lots in NE portion of site (reduction of one lot) 2) Widen single-family lots throughout southern portion of site (reduction of two lots) 3) Allow option for one single-family lot to be used for community pool 4) Amend certain lot standards. Potential Action: Move to direct staff to prepare documents approving the amendment to the Weston Woods PUD and plat. D. Loram and Scannell Medina Industrial – Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) – Proposed Commercial/Industrial Development - Scannell Properties and Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc., have submitted an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) related to potential development of approximately 450,000 square feet of warehouse/office/light industrial buildings on approximately 25 acres east of Arrowhead Drive, south of Highway 55. The applicants have indicated that Loram would occupy the northern building to expand their operations in Medina and that the parties intend to lease the other two buildings. The subject property is guided for business development in the current staging and growth period. Chapter 4410 of Minnesota Rules regulates Environmental Review and requires mandatory completion of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for development of 300,000 square feet or more of warehouse/light industrial space within a city of Medina’s size. Potential Actions: 1. Motion to approve the Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial EAW Findings of Fact and Record of Decision 2. Motion to adopt the resolution approving the response to comments, findings of fact, and record of decision for the Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial EAW and making a negative declaration upon the need for an Environmental Impact Statement E. Landform on Behalf of McDonald’s - 822 Hwy 55 – Conditional Use Permit Amendment - On behalf of McDonalds, USA, LLC, Landform requests a conditional use permit amendment. McDonald’s currently has a single lane drive-through and propose modifications to allow for two lanes, which widens and lengthens the drive-through in its current location. The subject property is located at 822 State Highway 55, which is located at the NW corner of 116/55. Potential Action: Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the amendment to the CUP subject to the conditions noted. 4 XI. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 006303E-006327E for $107,695.10 and order check numbers 052736-052791 for $323,272.57, and payroll EFT 0511716-0511776 for $118,016.69. INFORMATION PACKET: • Planning Department Update • Police Department Update • Public Works Department Update • Claims List Medina City Council Special Meeting Minutes 1 March 15, 2022 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 15, 2021 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in special session on March 15, 2022, at 6:00 p.m. at the Medina City Hall, 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN. I. Call to Order Members present: Martin, Albers, Reid, DesLauriers, Cavanaugh Members absent: Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, Finance Director Erin Barnhart, Public Safety Director Jason Nelson, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, and Planning Director Dusty Finke II. Manganese Presentation Public Works Director Steve Scherer provided a presentation on Manganese levels in the City water system. Staff provided information on the upcoming water treatment plant expansion for the Hamel area of Medina. The filter media replacement and water treatment plant expansion will address the high Manganese levels. Water treatment plants for the Morningside and Independence Beach water systems is not economically feasible (approximately $2.5 million each) to address high manganese levels. Staff was directed by the City Council to put together letters to residents in both areas notifying them that reverse osmosis or water softener systems in homes will address the high manganese levels. Other resources for water testing will also be included with the letter and educational information. III. Water Treatment Plant Expansion Feasibility Report Public Works Director Steve Scherer provided a presentation on the water treatment plant expansion. Staff discussed replacement of the current media filters, installation of the third filter to add capacity, and the possibility of future grant funding. Current debt on the water treatment plant falls off in two years. Staff was directed by the City Council to investigate options, monitor interest rates, and do not drain individual accounts for projects. The meeting was recessed at 6:59 p.m. until after the 7:00 p.m. City Council meeting. The meeting was called to order at 8:11 p.m. IV. Water Meter/Reading Equipment Discussion Public Works Director Steve Scherer explained the old system is being phased out and will lose support soon. Staff is recommending moving forward with the expenditure. Council directed staff to move forward with the expenditure. Medina City Council Special Meeting Minutes 2 March 15, 2022 V. Water Equipment Funding Sources Discussion Staff provided the Council with information on options for funding sources. Council directed staff to continue to look at all options, keep an eye on interest rates, and bring forward a reimbursement resolution for the projects. Public Works Director Steve Scherer discussed the 60-year-old watermain in the Medina Morningside neighborhood. Staff will try to keep the road intact and investigate options like “pipe bursting” to keep construction at a minimum. VI. Adjournment Martin closed the meeting at 8:36 p.m. _________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: ____________________________ Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator Medina City Council Meeting Minutes March 15, 2022 1 DRAFT 1 2 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 15, 2022 3 4 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on March 15, 2022 at 7:00 5 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Martin presided. 6 7 Martin stated that the meeting is being held in a virtual format due to the ongoing 8 pandemic and provided instructions for public participation. 9 10 I. ROLL CALL 11 12 Members present: Albers, Cavanaugh, DesLauriers, Martin, and Reid. 13 14 Members absent: None. 15 16 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Attorney Ron Batty, Finance 17 Director Erin Barnhart, City Engineer Jim Stremel, City Planning Director Dusty Finke, 18 Public Works Director Steve Scherer, and Chief of Police Jason Nelson. 19 20 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:03 p.m.) 21 22 III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:04 p.m.) 23 The agenda was approved as presented. 24 25 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:04 p.m.) 26 27 A. Approval of the March 1, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 28 Moved by Martin, seconded by Reid, to approve the March 1, 2022 regular City Council 29 meeting minutes as presented. 30 31 A roll call vote was performed: 32 33 DesLauriers aye 34 Albers aye 35 Cavanaugh aye 36 Reid aye 37 Martin aye 38 39 Motion passed unanimously. 40 41 V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:05 p.m.) 42 43 A. Adopt Resolution for Abraham Accessory Dwelling Unit Conditional Use 44 Permit 45 B. Adopt Resolution for Deng Septic Variance 46 C. Approve Resolution Reestablishing Precincts and Polling Places 47 D. Approve Lawn and Grounds Services Agreement 48 E. Approve Portable Sanitation Agreement 49 F. Approve Amended and Restated Grounds Services Agreement with Orono 50 Baseball 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes March 15, 2022 2 G. Approve Amended and Restated Grounds Services Agreement with Hamel 1 Athletic Club 2 H. Approve Hamel Legion Park Concession Services Agreement with the 3 Hamel Athletic Club 4 I. Approve Renewal of Consumption and Display Permit for American Legion 5 Post 394 at 75 Hamel Road 6 J. Approve the Appointment of Trevor Ratke to the Public Works Maintenance 7 Technician Position 8 K. Approve Service and Videography Agreement with Cipher Laboratories Inc. 9 L. Ordinance Adopting an Amended Fee Schedule for Clean-up Day 10 M. Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance Adopting an Amended 11 Fee Schedule by Title and Summary 12 N. Feasibility Report for Water Treatment Plant 13 Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Reid, to approve the consent agenda. 14 15 A roll call vote was performed: 16 17 DesLauriers aye 18 Albers aye 19 Cavanaugh aye 20 Reid aye 21 Martin aye 22 23 Motion passed unanimously. 24 25 VI. COMMENTS (7:08 p.m.) 26 27 A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 28 There were none. 29 30 B. Park Commission 31 Scherer reported that the Park Commission will meet the following night to welcome its 32 new member and receive a presentation from the Hamel Athletic Club for a new 33 scoreboard at the Paul Fortin field. He noted that the existing scoreboard would then be 34 moved to another field. He stated that HAC would like to get the scoreboard project 35 completed by July. He noted that the Commission will also receive an update on the 36 plans for Lakeshore Park. 37 38 C. Planning Commission 39 Planning Commissioner Rhem reported that the Planning Commission met the previous 40 week to consider the request to amend the plat for Weston Woods. He noted that the 41 changes would reduce density and was supported by the Commission. He stated that 42 the Commission also reviewed a request to expand the McDonald’s drive-thru and that 43 was also unanimously supported by the Commission. He noted that the Commission 44 also reviewed a potential land acquisition and found that to be consistent with the 45 Comprehensive Plan. 46 47 VII. PRESENTATIONS 48 49 A. Hennepin County Commissioner Kevin Anderson (7:13 p.m.) 50 Johnson introduced Hennepin County Commissioner Kevin Anderson. 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes March 15, 2022 3 1 County Commissioner Anderson introduced himself noting that he was elected in 2020 2 and took office in January of 2021. He provided background information on his career 3 and government experience along with his committee and board assignments. He 4 provided information on the County budget, ARP funding distribution, affordable housing, 5 other programs to address housing and homelessness, broadband expansion, and 6 stable housing for veterans. He stated that they are beginning to implement a hybrid 7 format which will allow some people to go back to work in the office and others continue 8 to work from home. He stated that they have also been working to raise awareness and 9 prevention of gun violence. He provided additional details on the work they have been 10 doing to expand mental health services. He noted the expanded training center for the 11 Sheriff’s Department and the embedded social worker program. 12 13 Martin expressed appreciation for the work Anderson is doing on behalf of the County 14 and residents of Medina. 15 16 Albers asked what the County has been doing to address the opioid problem. 17 18 Anderson replied that many of the things the County is doing has been designed to meet 19 those needs, supporting law enforcement officers, and attempting to address the other 20 issues that go along with addiction (homelessness, mental health, crime, etc.). He 21 stated that the County also joined the opioid settlement which will provide funding to 22 increase services and ensure there are treatment options available. 23 24 Cavanaugh thanked Anderson for the presentation and hard work. 25 26 Reid expressed appreciation to Anderson for attending the meeting. 27 28 DesLauriers referenced the statement that $246,000,000 was distributed in 2021. He 29 asked the amount distributed in 2020 for comparison and the projection for 2022. 30 31 Anderson replied that Hennepin County received approximately $240,000,000 from 32 CARES as well as the $246,000,000 received through ARPA. He noted that Hennepin 33 County did not spend all those dollars and advised that he can provide more detailed 34 information on how those funds were allocated. He stated that the County has through 35 2025 to spend those dollars and will be using those to fund programs and methods to 36 stabilize the programs which will not cause increased funding needs in the future when 37 those funds are not available. He used the example of investing in affordable housing 38 which will provide benefit for the future. 39 40 DesLauriers referenced the funding into mental health, which tapers down to zero dollars 41 and asked for more information. 42 43 Anderson replied that is showing the ARPA portion of the funding. He noted that they 44 hope to see a shift in upstream resources which would alleviate pressure on emergency 45 services which are much more expensive. He stated that if they can divert those 46 situations upstream, they can fund those avenues on a more permanent basis and 47 hopefully prevent more of those emergency situations. 48 49 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes March 15, 2022 4 Martin recognized that the County relies on real estate taxes to a certain degree and 1 asked if there has been an impact to the budget because of the devaluation in real 2 estate values. She asked how the County will be covering that gap. 3 4 Anderson replied that residents have, or will be, receiving their valuation notices. He 5 commented that residential property values have raised nearly 17 percent while 6 commercial real estate has remained flat, or perhaps decreased in some areas. He 7 noted that shifting that tax burden from commercial properties to residential properties is 8 a main concern of his. He commented that it will be a real challenge to keep the tax 9 burden low on residents while still addressing the needs of the County to provide 10 services. 11 12 VIII. NEW BUSINESS 13 14 A. Land Sale Discussion – Portion of PID 02-118-23-24-0002 – Marsh Point 15 Preserve (7:34 p.m.) 16 Johnson stated that there is a 30-foot-wide strip of property running north/south in the 17 middle of the subdivision which the City obtained through tax forfeiture. He commented 18 that the parcel is located within a large wetland with a small portion that would include a 19 portion of the right of way for Marsh Point Preserve. He stated that Finke will present 20 options for the Council to consider. 21 22 Finke stated that the City Attorney, staff, and the developer have discussed paths 23 forward. He noted that only a small portion of the property is located outside of the 24 wetland area and the total acquisition cost for the auction price and fees was just over 25 $1,600. He stated that it would be proposed to recoup those costs with administrative 26 costs for a potential purchase price of $1,850. He noted that rather than having a 27 separate purchase agreement, staff would include the sale of the property as a provision 28 of the development agreement to be approved at the time of final plat. 29 30 Cavanaugh asked if this additional land would make the property more developable. 31 32 Finke replied that the buildable property is on the north property line and would be part 33 of the right-of-way dedicated in the plat and would not be part of any home sites. 34 35 Cavanaugh referenced the Diamond Lake Regional Trail (DLRT) and asked the path 36 that would be proposed to follow. 37 38 Finke stated that two locations were discussed for potential trail easements and 39 identified those locations. He stated that the trail and street would cross east to west 40 across the buildable portion of the land. 41 42 Cavanaugh asked if the City could use the land for parking spots along the roadway 43 and/or benches along the trail. 44 45 Finke commented that the strip of red property is 30 feet wide, and the buildable portion 46 is only about 35 feet across and would be included in trail or road right-of-way. He 47 stated that after recording of the plat the land would remain in right-of-way and therefore 48 the City would retain those abilities. 49 50 DesLauriers asked if staff would ever consider the red area to be used for the DLRT. 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes March 15, 2022 5 1 Finke replied that was considered as one of the options, but the potential issue would be 2 that the south end would end in the wetland and that route is probably the longest route 3 through the wetland in any location. He noted that the other trail options would minimize 4 the wetland crossings which is why they were seen as better options. 5 6 Martin commented that there is about 1,000 square feet of usable land which would 7 equate to about $1.80 per square foot. She asked how that compares to the valuation 8 for park dedication. 9 10 Finke stated that the calculation for park dedication would be higher per square foot but 11 noted that this would be more equivalent to what the City would be paying for parkland 12 to the west. 13 14 Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Martin, to direct staff to include provision for the 15 sale of the 30-foot-wide extension of PID 02-118-23-24-0002 for a cost of $1,850 to BPS 16 Properties within the Marsh Pointe Preserve development agreement. 17 18 A roll call vote was performed: 19 20 DesLauriers aye 21 Albers aye 22 Cavanaugh aye 23 Reid aye 24 Martin aye 25 26 Motion passed unanimously. 27 28 B. Virtual Meeting Discussion (7:47 p.m.) 29 Johnson stated that staff worked with the City Attorney to draft a plan to return to in 30 person meetings beginning with the May 3rd City Council meeting and provided 31 additional details. He confirmed the consensus of the Council to return to in person 32 meetings beginning with the May 3rd City Council Meeting. 33 34 IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (7:49 p.m.) 35 Johnson had nothing further to report. 36 37 X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (7:49 p.m.) 38 Martin noted clean-up day on April 30th. 39 40 DesLauriers noted the Loretto pancake breakfast on April 24th and Long Lake on May 41 1st. 42 43 Cavanaugh stated that he provided Johnson some ideas of things the City could do 44 related to the situation in Ukraine. He welcomed additional ideas the Council may have. 45 46 Reid stated that perhaps support could be provided to relocate a few refugee families in 47 Medina. 48 49 Martin commented that there are a lot of Ukrainian refugees coming to the border near 50 Mexico. She commented that she would welcome placing an article in the newsletter, a 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes March 15, 2022 6 resolution that would support rule of law across the world but was uncertain that she 1 would like to accept funds or families or earmark City funds. She noted that many of the 2 members of the Council support outreach of nonprofits in the community, but City funds 3 are not earmarked for that purpose. 4 5 Cavanaugh noted that his suggestion would be to have a nonprofit administer collection 6 of donations for that purpose. He recognized the difficulty in lighting the water tower but 7 noted that a blue and yellow banner could be placed on a retaining wall. 8 9 Martin commented that the only time donations have been allowed for collection at 10 clean-up day was a private resident that was collecting for milkweed which relates in a 11 manner to clean-up day. She was not certain she wanted to tie that type of donation 12 collection to clean-up day. 13 14 Albers commented that he agrees with the comments of Martin. He agreed that the 15 milkweed seeds were environmentally related to clean-up day and did not want to bring 16 something that could be considered a political issue with a City event. He agreed that it 17 is a horrible situation and noted that he would support hanging a blue and yellow flag or 18 banner, but otherwise would leave organization of other efforts to local nonprofits. 19 20 DesLauriers thanked Cavanaugh for bringing his ideas to Medina. He agreed with the 21 comments of Albers and Martin. He stated that he would support the idea of a resolution 22 and providing information to residents in the newsletter that could link them with an 23 organization that could accept donations. 24 25 Reid agreed that it would be helpful to provide residents with information where they can 26 make donations for the cause. 27 28 Albers suggested that only a reputable site be provided by the City, such as the Red 29 Cross. 30 31 Cavanaugh noted that he would be happy to look into it with City staff to find a reputable 32 international organization for donations, such a UNICEF. 33 34 Johnson stated that staff can draft a resolution for the Council to review but was unsure 35 the City would want to fly the flag of another country at a City building. 36 37 Martin noted that the flags are pretty cheap to purchase online if residents wanted to 38 purchase them for their own property. She confirmed the consensus of the Council to 39 direct staff to prepare a resolution as well as prepare a newsletter article. 40 41 Reid commented that the design has been completed for the Uptown Hamel banners 42 and a presentation will be made for the cost for the banners. 43 44 XI. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (8:06 p.m.) 45 Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by DesLauriers, to approve the bills, EFT 006285E-46 006302E for $55,346.71, order check numbers 052685-052735 for $191,064.16, and 47 payroll EFT 0511680-0511715 for $59,716.16. 48 49 A roll call vote was performed: 50 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes March 15, 2022 7 DesLauriers aye 1 Albers aye 2 Cavanaugh aye 3 Reid aye 4 Martin aye 5 6 Motion passed unanimously. 7 8 XII. ADJOURN 9 Moved by Reid, seconded by Martin, to adjourn the meeting at 8:08 p.m. 10 11 A roll call vote was performed: 12 13 DesLauriers aye 14 Albers aye 15 Cavanaugh aye 16 Reid aye 17 Martin aye 18 19 Motion passed unanimously. 20 21 22 __________________________________ 23 Kathy Martin, Mayor 24 Attest: 25 26 ____________________________________ 27 Scott Johnson, City Administrator 28 Resolution No. 2022-XX April 5, 2022 Member _________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE PEOPLE OF UKRAINE WHEREAS, the City of Medina supports the people of Ukraine and open and free governments; and WHEREAS, Ukraine, as an independent nation that is free to choose its own leaders and forge its own destiny, now faces an unjustified and illegal war of aggression that threatens its sovereignty and the safety and way of life of its citizens; and WHEREAS, the people of Medina stand for the values of “Freedom and Justice for All,” especially in the face of tyranny and aggression; and WHEREAS, the City of Medina commends the courage, resolve and strength of the Ukrainian people in their pursuit to preserve their freedom and the independence of their government, the City of Medina pays tribute to the brave men and women of Ukraine who have given their lives in the hope that those who fight alongside them and those who come after them may live in a secure, safe, democratic and independent Ukraine. The City of Medina condemns the illegal military invasion of Ukraine and the violence it has caused; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY OF MEDINA CITY COUNCIL, that we support the people of Ukraine and their fight for an open and free government and the preservation of their democracy. Dated: April 5, 2022. By: ______________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: By: ___________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ________ upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Agenda Item #5A Resolution No. 2022-XX April 5, 2022 Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2022- April 5, 2022 Member ______ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2022- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DEBT SERVICE FUND 2011B HUNTER NORTH IMP BOND AND 2012B GO REFUNDING BOND BALANCE TRANSFER AND CLOSING WHEREAS, the City of Medina has paid in full the terms of 2011B Hunter North Imp Bond and 2012B GO Refunding Bonds; and WHEREAS, the City of Medina desires to transfer any remaining balance after payment to the Road Improvement Fund and TIF I-9 Fund; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, that the City of Medina hereby agrees to the following adjustments to the City’s Funds by authorizing the transfer of $10,990.65 from the 2011B Hunter Drive North Imp Fund to the Road Improvement Fund and $4,507 from the 2012B GO Refunding Fund to the TIF Fund. BE IT HEREBY FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall authorize the closure of said fund upon completion of the indicated transaction. Dated: April 5, 2022. ______________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _____ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: None Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Agenda Item #5B 1 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE March 17, 2022 MEETING: April 5, 2022 SUBJECT Road Materials and Equipment Bid Tabulation Summary Twelve sealed bid responses were received prior to the deadline and opened in public session on Thursday, March 17th at 10:00 a.m. Contractor responses have been recorded in the enclosed spreadsheet, Road Materials and Equipment Bid Tabulation - 2022 (Exhibit A). Staff Recommendation Accept the low bids, as highlighted in yellow on Exhibit A, with the intention to hire those contractors whenever possible. If unexpected issues arise (i.e., scheduling/delivery needs), it may be necessary to engage the contractor with the second lowest bid. Lowest bid details are recorded as follows: Bituminous Mixtures for paving and patching roads (#1, & #2, & #3, & #4) • Minnesota Roadways (delivered/placed on city streets) • Martin Marietta (picked up) Bituminous Mixtures for paving and patching trails (placed on city trails) (#5) • Omann Brothers Inc. Bituminous Fine Mix/Sand Mix (#6) • Omann Brothers Inc. Bituminous Integral Curb Installation (#7) • Omann Brothers Inc. Bituminous Integral Curb Installation (#8) • Omann Brothers Inc. Milling of Bituminous Surface (which includes Milling Removal) (#9) • Omann Brothers Inc. Miscellaneous Milling Services (#10) • Omann Brothers Inc. – 60” Machine Width • GMH Asphalt - 96” Machine Width • Minnesota Roadways - 40” Machine Width MEMORANDUM Agenda Item #5C 2 Reclaim Roadway (#11) • Omann Brothers Inc. Sealcoating/Installed CRS-2 Liquid Asphalt (#12A & #12B) • Pearson Brothers Inc. Curb Installation (#13 & #14 & #15) • No Bid Non-reinforced Concrete Flat Work (#16) • No Bid Crushed Limestone (delivered to site) (#17 & #18 & #19) • Kraemer Mining & Mat Inc. Clean Crushed Limestone (delivered to site) (#20) • Kraemer Mining & Mat Inc. Crushed Recycled Material-Bituminous (#21) • Bryan Rock Products Inc. Class 5 Gravel (delivered to site) (#22) • Fehn Companies, Inc. Winter Sand (delivered to site) (#23) • Hassan Sand & Gravel Clean Crushed Limestone Chips (delivered to site) (#24) • Bryan Rock Products Inc. Granite or Trap Rock (#25) • No Bids Rip Rap (delivered to site) (#26) • Kraemer Mining & Mat Inc. Equipment Rental (#27 - #30) – Equipment Rental items varied slightly and therefore, each rental would be evaluated for the type and size of equipment needed for the job. Miscellaneous Equipment & Other Bid Details (listed in Additional Remarks section) Attachment Road Materials and Equipment Bid Tabulation - 2022 (Exhibit A) City of Medina Road Materials and Equipment Bid Tabulation ‐ 2022 ‐ Exhibit A blue = notations yellow = lowest or sole bid Company Name Designing Nature Kraemer Mining & Materials Pearson Bros KD & Co Recycling Fehn Martin Marietta Hassan Sand & Gravel Bryan Rock Products DMJ Asphalt MN Roadways GMH Asphalt Omann Material/Bid #1 MN‐D.O.T. SPNWB230(B) MIX Picked up $58.00 $67.00 $68.07 Delivered to site $71.00 Placed on city streets $93.00 $79.85 #2 MN‐D.O.T. SPNWB330(B) MIX Picked up $57.20 $67.00 Delivered to site $72.00 Placed on city streets $94.00 $83.50 $79.85 # 3 MN‐D.O.T. SPWEB240(B) MIX Picked up $55.50 $66.00 $68.07 Delivered to site $69.00 Placed on city streets $91.00 $83.50 $79.85 #4 MN‐D.O.T. SPWEB340(C) MIX Picked up $63.30 $74.00 Delivered to site $78.00 Placed on city streets $22.00 #5 MN‐D.O.T. SPWEA240(B) MIX NOTE: mix only $60.65 NOTE: paver under 8‐1/2' wide requires addt'l charge for a little paver rental Placed on city trails $128.50 $175.00 $109.00 #6 BITUMINOUS FINE MIX/SAND MIX Picked up $87.00 Delivered to site #7 AGGREGATE SHOULDERING PLACED (MnDOT 2118)NOTE: class 5 recycle Delivered to site per ton $28.60 $28.25 Mobilization Fee $2,950.00 $1,200.00 #8 BITUMINOUS INTEGRAL CURB INSTALLATION Installation Price per Lin Ft $12.00 $5.00 Page 1 of 4 City of Medina Road Materials and Equipment Bid Tabulation ‐ 2022 ‐ Exhibit A blue = notations yellow = lowest or sole bid Company Name Designing Nature Kraemer Mining & Materials Pearson Bros KD & Co Recycling Fehn Martin Marietta Hassan Sand & Gravel Bryan Rock Products DMJ Asphalt MN Roadways GMH Asphalt Omann Material/Bid #9 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE AT DEPTH PER SQ YD (INCLUDING MILLING REMOVAL) 0 ‐ 2" Depth per sq yard $7.90 $2.15 2 ‐ 4" Depth per sq yard $10.10 $3.68 4 ‐ 6" Depth per sq yard $12.25 $4.85 Mobilization Fee $2,000.00 $500.00 #10 MISCELLANEOUS MILLING SERVICES AT PER HOUR RATE NOTE: + trucking $135/hr per truck + 24' detail mill $250/hr Width of Machine 40" 96" 60" Per Hour Rate $150.00 $1,975.00 $525.00 Mobilization Fee $1,000.00 $1,875.00 $500.00 #11 RECLAIM ROADWAY AT DEPTH PER SQUARE YARD NOTE: includes grading & compaction; 6' rear drum reclaimer 0 ‐ 2" Depth per sq yard $3.95 2 ‐ 4" Depth per sq yard $3.95 4 ‐ 6" Depth per sq yard $3.95 Mobilization Fee $800.00 Reclaimer Per Hour #12A SEALCOATING INSTALLED CRS‐2 LIQUID ASPHALT @.27Gal/SqYd 1/8” Trap rock@25#/SqYd 0 ‐ 25,000 sq yds $1.42 25‐50,000 sq yds $1.42 50‐75,000 sq yds $1.42 75‐100,000 sq yds $1.42 #12B SEALCOATING INSTALLED CRS‐ 2 LIQUID ASPHALT @.30 Gal/SqYd FA2 Granite @28#/SqYd 0 ‐ 25,000 sq yds $1.42 25‐50,000 sq yds $1.42 50‐75,000 sq yds $1.42 75‐100,000 sq yds $1.42 Page 2 of 4 City of Medina Road Materials and Equipment Bid Tabulation ‐ 2022 ‐ Exhibit A blue = notations yellow = lowest or sole bid Company Name Designing Nature Kraemer Mining & Materials Pearson Bros KD & Co Recycling Fehn Martin Marietta Hassan Sand & Gravel Bryan Rock Products DMJ Asphalt MN Roadways GMH Asphalt Omann Material/Bid #13 CURB INSTALLATION MN‐ D.O.T. D424 Remove/Replace Lin Ft R&R‐other Lin Ft New Installation Lin Ft #14 CURB INSTALLATION MN‐ D.O.T. B618 Remove/Replace Lin Ft R&R‐other Lin Ft New Installation Lin Ft #15 CURB INSTALLATION ‐ RIBBON CURB MnDOT 2531 12"w X 5' depth Lin Ft 18"w X 5' depth Lin Ft 24"w X 5' depth Lin Ft #16 NON REINFORCED CONCRETE FLAT WORK 4" Thick per sq. foot 6" Thick per sq. foot 8" Thick per sq. foot #17 ¾ “ MINUS CRUSHED LIMESTONE Delivered to site per ton $17.95 $24.53 $18.90 #18 1” MINUS (MN‐D.O.T. 3138, CLASS 5) CRUSHED LIMESTONE Delivered to site per ton $16.45 $24.53 $18.50 #19 1 ½” MINUS CRUSHED LIMESTONE Delivered to site per ton $17.00 $24.58 $18.50 #20 1 ½” CLEAN CRUSHED LIMESTONE Delivered to site per ton $25.95 $34.53 $28.20 #21 CLASS 5 CRUSHED RECYCLED MAT‐ BITUMINOUS CON‐BIT Picked up per ton $10.49 $12.00 $14.00 $7.80 Delivered to site per ton $16.99 $18.00 $15.05 #22 CLASS 5 GRAVEL Delivered to site per ton $18.10 Page 3 of 4 City of Medina Road Materials and Equipment Bid Tabulation ‐ 2022 ‐ Exhibit A blue = notations yellow = lowest or sole bid Company Name Designing Nature Kraemer Mining & Materials Pearson Bros KD & Co Recycling Fehn Martin Marietta Hassan Sand & Gravel Bryan Rock Products DMJ Asphalt MN Roadways GMH Asphalt Omann Material/Bid #23 FA‐1 (WINTER SAND) Delivered to site per ton $14.90 #24 5/16” CLEAN CRUSHED LIMESTONE CHIPS Delivered to site per ton $28.20 #25 3/16” CLEAN F.A. 3 GRANITE OR TRAP ROCK Delivered to site per ton #26 CLASS 3 RIP RAP Delivered to site per ton $41.00 $47.70 #27 ‐ TANDEM AXLE DUMP TRUCK WITH OPERATOR Quad (18‐18 ST) Box Size ‐ Cubic yards 14 ‐ 15 10 Per Hour Rate $110.00 $119.00 $110.00 #28 ‐ CRAWLER DOZER WITH OPERATOR Size of Machine D5 CAT D5K LGP D6 CAT Per Hour Rate $150.00 $150.00 $165.00 Mobilization Fee $450.00 $400.00 #29 ‐ CRAWLER LOADER WITH OPERATOR Size of Machine ‐ Cubic yards Per Hour Rate #30 ‐ CRAWLER BACKHOE WITH OPERATOR Bucket Size ‐ Cubic yards 3.5 1.75 Per Hour Rate $150.00 $175.00 Mobilization Fee $400.00 ADDITIONAL REMARKS price includes material, delivery, taxes; full truck loads ‐ 18 ton min per load 2% discount if purchases made during any month are paid by 15th of the following month all deliveries based on end‐dump semis (25‐25) ton loads. All loads less than 23 ton are subject to addt'l del charges. 12cubic yd Triaxle prep $110/hr 13‐1/2 cubic yd quad $115/hr 14 cubic yd, quint $120/hr 17‐1/2 cubic yd Super 7 $130/hr Skid mill w/operator $135/hr Skid loader w/operator $120/hr Page 4 of 4 Uptown Hamel Page 1 of 2 April 5, 2022 Economic Development RFP City Council Meeting + TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Colette Baumgardner, Planning Intern Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: March 30, 2022 MEETING: April 5, 2022 - City Council SUBJECT: Uptown Hamel Economic Development RFP Background In the Fall of 2021, the City of Medina was awarded a grant from Hennepin County through their Housing & Economic Development Corridor Planning program. The grant is for a maximum of $25,000 from Hennepin County and requires at least a 25% match (minimum of $6,250 if the full grant is utilized) from the City. The grant was intended to be used to fund a request for proposals (RFP) for economic development consulting services. The intent of the project is to receive guidance from a firm with successful experience in economic development to create an actionable plan for how the City and property owners can encourage and support development. The plan will be based on current and projected market conditions, previous community visioning sessions, conversations with business and property owners, and existing development. Shortly before the March 1, 2022 City Council meeting, staff learned about a program within the UMN Extension office that could potentially offer some of these services. Upon further discussion, the City learned that the UMN is only capable of completing part of the scope of work, which would require substantially more coordination between two providers. Staff thought it would create a more cohesive product for the City to keep both components of the RFP in one contract. Summary of RFP The RFP consists of two main research components: market analysis and redevelopment feasibility analysis/action plan. The market analysis will identify the current and projected demand for goods and services in Uptown Hamel with a specific focus on food and beverage businesses. The redevelopment feasibility analysis/action plan will identify barriers to developing the current market potential and opportunities to be leveraged. The feasibility analysis will pay special attention to any potential gaps between the current market potential and the development allowed in the city code. These two components will then be used to create an action plan for the City on how to support improvements, expansions, and new development in Uptown Hamel. MEMORANDUM Agenda Item #5D Uptown Hamel Page 2 of 2 April 5, 2022 Economic Development RFP City Council Meeting The proposed RFP has been discussed among the Uptown Hamel property owner’s group, and they reached an informal consensus supporting the future work. At the time of their review, the RFP included another section requesting the creation of development design standards. However, upon further discussion with Hennepin County, they advised that design standards would be out of scope for this RFP. Staff also believes that the results of this analysis may very well inform creation of design standards, but such work would likely be provided by a different type of professional. Given the timeframe for solicitation and review, the services on the proposed RFP would begin in early June 2022. The grant funding from Hennepin County must be spent by the end of 2022. Recommended Action Move to approve the Request for Proposal for economic development in Uptown Hamel. Attachment 1. Proposed Economic Development Request for Proposal REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Uptown Hamel Market Analysis and Redevelopment Feasibility Study Submission Deadline: May 2, 2022, at 8:00 AM City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 763-473-4643 2 I. Introduction The City of Medina, in partnership with Hennepin County Housing and Economic Development, invites you to respond to this request for proposals (“RFP”) for economic development consulting services focused in the Uptown Hamel area of the City of Medina. Redevelopment and improvement in Uptown Hamel has been a priority in the City’s planning over the past 15 years. Significant investments have been made in street, utility, sidewalk, and lighting improvements using with Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and property owner assessments. However even with these improvements, redevelopment in Uptown Hamel has been limited. The purpose of this contract is to create an actionable plan of how the City can best support improvements and expansions in Uptown Hamel. The plan must be tailored to the local conditions of Uptown Hamel and include local perspective. The anticipated award of the contract is June 7. II. Background The Hamel Road corridor through Uptown Hamel is Medina’s “downtown” area. The Uptown Hamel area is a half mile stretch of Hamel Road between the City’s eastern border and its Rainwater Nature Area, just east of Hunter Drive (shown in Attachment 1). Uptown Hamel’s western half currently includes predominantly single-family homes, and its eastern half includes a mix of businesses and institutional uses including antique shops, small offices, a bar, a bank, the Hamel Fire Department, and a postal office. Uptown Hamel is bordered to the south by Hamel Legion Park - the City’s primary community park. Hamel Legion Park includes a community building and regularly hosts youth baseball programs and tournaments at its ballfields. Significant residential development has occurred to the south of Uptown Hamel in both Medina and Plymouth in the past decade. Approximately 340 single family and townhome units have been developed within ¼ mile of the corridor, with estimated market values between $400,000 and $700,000. Down the bluff to the north, a commercial development has occurred along State Highway 55. A credit union, restaurant, hair salon/boutique, dance studio, and an Aldi grocery store have opened there between 2008 and 2015. The City of Medina has a commitment to protecting its natural resources and rural character, which means opportunities for commercial development in the City is limited. As the area guided towards creating a pedestrian-friendly, mixed-use town center, Uptown Hamel is a unique opportunity in the City. The area also contains some of the highest residential densities allowed in the City with allowance up to 20 units per acre. During the latest comprehensive plan process, residents indicated they would like to see Uptown Hamel revitalized, while maintaining its unique character. The City has continued public engagement efforts since and found there is a sustained desire for more restaurants, coffee shops, other gathering spots, and more pedestrian-friendly infrastructure in the area. Revitalization and redevelopment of Uptown Hamel is a high priority for Medina’s future economic development efforts. A market study and feasibility report complete with actionable next steps will be essential as a catalyst for this work. 3 III. Project Goals The purpose of this RFP is to create an action plan that the City and property owners will use to guide revitalization and redevelopment in Uptown Hamel. Objectives include: Conduct a market study analyzing the current conditions and projected demand for different uses in Uptown Hamel. Complete a redevelopment feasibility analysis considering potential commercial/retail, professional office, mixed use and housing development. Identify economic constraints and other development barriers in Uptown Hamel. Provide recommendations to address those barriers to realize redevelopment and infill opportunities desired by community. IV. Scope of Services The following list summarizes the tasks to be included as part of this work. City staff welcome suggestions in the proposal for additional elements that could enhance the process and product. The City has received a Corridor Planning grant from Hennepin County Housing and Economic Development of up $25,000 to support the project. The grant requires a minimum match of 25% from the City. Demographic and Market Analysis Define trade area with demographic data. Analysis of current economic climate of Uptown Hamel and the defined trade area. Identify existing supply and projected demand for different uses and business types. Use types should include commercial, retail, food & beverage, professional office, and housing. Specific attention should be provided for the potential for food and beverage establishments. Deliverable: Market study report summarizing the above tailored to Uptown Hamel. City staff to provide input and assistance as needed. Staff to review and approve prior to report finalization. Redevelopment Feasibility Analysis and Action Plan Identify opportunities which may encourage investment in Uptown Hamel and strategies/actions to take advantage of such opportunities. Identify challenges which may discourage investment in the area and strategies/actions to address the barriers identified. Use variety of data collection methods such as property owner interviews/roundtable, developer interviews/roundtable, literature review, or others. Consider how the physical surroundings, built form, and existing regulatory requirements impact its feasibility for redevelopment and improvements, including traffic, building height and massing, parking, and pedestrian connectivity. 4 Provide a projection of future development potential that includes square footage of different land use types that could be supported by the market, including residential as well as commercial space. Provide proof of concept drawings exhibiting potential mass and scale of development which could be supported by market potential. Deliverable 1: A development feasibility report summarizing the above. City staff to provide input and assistance as needed. Staff to review and approve prior to report finalization. Deliverable 2: An action plan for the City and property owners to encourage and support improvements, expansions, and new construction, incorporating elements from the market analysis and feasibility report. City staff to provide input and assistance as needed. Staff to review and approve prior to report finalization. V. Requirements and Proposal A. Cover Letter (1 page) B. Project Proposal (4 pages maximum) 1. Provide a detailed description of your approach to the scope of work. Include details on your data collection approach, expected number of site visits, and how you will ensure the work will be specific to Uptown Hamel. 2. Communicate your understanding of the scope of work. Include any key issues expected to be associated with performing the required consulting services. C. Timeline (4 pages maximum for items C – G) 1. Provide a proposed schedule. Identify key milestones and the number of hours required for each task. 2. Project must be completed by December 31, 2022. D. City Resources 1. List the resources or other assistance that you expect are required from the City in order to complete each task in the scope of services. E. Proposed Project Team Members and Experience 1. Identify the lead consultant and other team members that will be providing service to this project, including their percentage of time dedicated to the project. 2. Provide a brief biographical history and project experience for each team member. Include most recent economic development services provided to similar government entities. 3. Provide a list of current and anticipated workload and an indication of how you can provide the service demands from Medina. 5 F. Client References 1. Furnish at least three client references from relevant services provided in the last five years. 2. Provide the references name, title, and contact phone number. G. Project Fee 1. Your fee shall include all home/office expenses, including any personnel costs and incidental expenses that would be incurred during the services provided to Medina. 2. Your fee should include a summary of projected retainer, hourly rates or combination thereof. H. Additional Information (1 page) 1. Include other items that you feel the City should review or consider during their review of your firm’s qualifications. VI. Selection Criteria Evaluation of proposals will be based on the following criteria: • Approach and scope of services with preference to proposals describing how deliverables would be tailored to Medina and Uptown Hamel • Relevant qualifications of firm(s) and personnel • Demonstrated experience and success in similar economic development activities • Estimated fees and reimbursables Firms are encouraged to partner with other firms and organizations to strengthen their proposal. Top ranking firms may be invited to interview before the City review team between April 25 and May 20. The review team will recommend their choice to the City Council for approval of a contract. VII. Project Schedule and Deliverables Solicitation of Request for Proposals: April 8, 2022 – May 2, 2022 Deadline for RFP Submittals: May 2, 2022, at 8:00 AM Review of Proposals and Interviews of Firms: May 2, 2022 – May 27, 2022 Selection of Consulting Firm and Award of Contract: May 27, 2022 – June 7, 2022 Services Begin: June 13, 2022 End of Services: Must be complete by December 31, 2022. Exact deadlines for deliverables will be determined with selected firm. 6 VIII. Proposal Submittal Interested consulting firms should submit their proposal via email to Dusty Finke at dusty.finke@medinamn.gov by May 2, 2022, at 8:00 AM, with subject line “Uptown Hamel RFP Application: [insert business name].” All questions shall be directed to Planning Director Dusty Finke at 763-473-8846 or via e-mail at dusty.finke@medinamn.gov Other Considerations The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals submitted and parts of any and all proposals, and to waive all irregularities and technicalities. The selected firm will be required to enter into a contract with the City prior to commencing work. The content of this RFP and the proposal will be incorporated said contract. There shall be no reimbursement for any expenses with responding to this Request for Proposal. Responses to this request for proposals will become public information in accordance with the Minnesota Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13. Attachment 1: Uptown Hamel Project Area Agenda Item #6C 1 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: March 29, 2022 MEETING: April 05, 2022 SUBJECT: Hamel Athletic Club - Fortin Field Scoreboard Summary The Hamel Athletic Club (HAC) and Hamel Hawks have requested permission from the City to install a new digital screen and scoreboard at Paul Fortin Field at Hamel Legion Park. Funding for the cost of the display and scoreboard is being provided by Hamel Lions and the City Council would need to accept the donation by formal resolution. In 2016, the City installed an 18’ high x 14’ wide scoreboard at Paul Fortin Field, almost entirely with donations raised by HAC. At the March 16, 2022 Park Commission meeting HAC presented a request to remove the scoreboard and replace with a 16’2” high x 25’ wide digital board and video screen. The Park Commission discussion included concerns about the impacts on neighboring properties due to the size and digital screen. The commission asked questions about the option to re-use or sell the existing scoreboard (which is city property after being donated by HAC) to recoup costs for the existing scoreboard that is on the asset inventory plan to be replaced again in 2041. HAC is requesting the City pay for the electrical work, up to $5000. After much discussion, the Park Commission decided against the recommendation to fund $5000, due to other park projects which are currently in process. Sign Ordinance Review (Planning Director Dusty Finke) In the past, the City has not required sign permits for scoreboards and other similar improvements in public parks, because these features were internal to the site and generally not intended to be viewed from adjacent streets or property. The proposed size of the dynamic display led staff to review this practice in the past, because it is significantly larger than would be permitted for a typical sign and dynamic display intended to be viewed from the exterior of the site. Staff believes it is still appropriate to not treat these types of features similar to signs which are more external to the site. If the Council agrees with the past practice of not applying the sign ordinance to scoreboards and similar features in public parks, it can proceed with authorization for installation of the new display and scoreboard. However, staff intends to prepare an MEMORANDUM Agenda Item #7A 2 ordinance amendment which would add an explicit exemption so that it is clarified in the code. The City Attorney believes it is important to clarify the exception, especially if there would ever be concerns raised from nearby property owners. Park Commission Recommendation Because of these other commitments, and because this project was not budgeted, the Park Commission recommends advancing to the City Council for review, with the stipulation that HAC does everything possible to sell and repurpose the existing scoreboard, to cover all costs for electrical work for the new scoreboard. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends accepting the proposal to install a new scoreboard at Paul Fortin Field. Attachments • Scoreboard Request Presentation Fortin Scoreboard Initiative What •Partnership between three local organizations to bring a state-of-the-art scoreboard to Paul Fortin Memorial Field Hamel Athletic Club Hamel Hawks Hamel Lions Club Ages 4-15 Amateur Baseball Since 1977 Why •Asset to City of Medina •Movie nights, reading nights •Asset to Businesses •Expanded advertising opportunities •Asset to baseball fans and players •Improved gameday experience for Hawks and HAC Existing Scoreboard Cons •Limited advertising space •Difficult to see advertisements from stands •Makes it difficult for HAC to find advertisers •Old Technology –not on par with other scoreboards at similar community fields Proposed Scoreboard Scoreboard Simulation Cost, Timing, and Request •Remove Existing and Install New: •Aim Electronics Inc.: $120,840 (Scoreboards) •DesLauriers & Sons: $4,000 (Fiber Install) •Cost to be fully covered by a $125,000 donation from Hamel Lions to the City of Medina Request •Electrical disconnect of existing scoreboard •Connection of new scoreboard Quote pending, maximum $5,000 •Ongoing Maintenance: •To be paid for by HAC in partnership with the Hawks •Timing: •Approval at this meeting such that it can be presented at the April City Council meeting. Approval in April would put us on track to have the board in place for this season Quotes Cates Industrial Park Page 1 of 12 April 5, 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment City Council Meeting TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: March 30, 2022 MEETING: April 5, 2022 City Council SUBJECT: Cates Industrial Park – Jeff and Chris Cates – Comprehensive Plan Amend. PIDs 04-118-23-11-0002, 04-118-23-14-0004, 03-118-23-22-0004 Summary of Request Jeff and Chris Cates have requested a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Concept Plan Review for development of approximately 665,000 square feet of warehouse/light industrial/office buildings on approximately 70 acres east of Willow Drive, north of Chippewa Road. The proposed amendment to the City’s Comprehensive Plan can generally be summarized as follows: • Change Future Land Use from Future Development Area to Business – this would add the subject site to the current Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) • Change Staging/Growth to allow immediate development (2020 staging period) Amending the future land use and staging would require amendments to various graphs, tables, and maps throughout the Plan to depict the changes. The subject site is predominantly farmland. A home and farm buildings are located in the southwest portion of the site. A shared driveway bisects the site heading east of Willow Drive to serve two homes to the east. There are twelve wetlands throughout the property, occupying approximately 5 acres of the site. The property is guided Future Development Area (FDA) and zoned Rural Residential-Urban Reserve (RR-UR). The aerial at the top of the following page depicts the subject site and surrounding land uses as follows: • West of site – Graphic Packaging and Twinco – zoned Business • West of site – Business guiding – currently farmed • East of the site – rural homes – guided FDA and zoned RR-UR, similar to the subject site. • South of the site – Business guiding • North of the site – agricultural/rural (City of Corcoran) – guided Low Density after 2035 MEMORANDUM Proposed Land Use: Business Current Land Use: Future Development Area Proposed Staging/Growth: 2020 period Gross Area: 70 acres Net Area: 60 acres Proposed construction: ~665,000 s.f. floor area Agenda Item #7B Cates Industrial Park Page 2 of 12 April 5, 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment City Council Meeting The applicant has submitted a concept plan along with the Comprehensive Plan Amendment application. Depending on the outcome of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, any development would be subject to rezoning, plat, and site plan review during a subsequent review process. Comprehensive Plan Information When considering requests to amend the Comprehensive Plan, the Vision and Community Goals (Chapter 2) provide general guidance. When amendments to land use are requested, the “Future Land Use Plan Principles” (pages 5-4 and 5-5 of the Land Use Plan) provide guidance. Similarly, principles which inform the Staging Plan are described on page 5-18 of the Land Use Plan. Chapter 2 and excerpts from Chapter 5 of the Plan are attached for reference. Cates Industrial Park Page 3 of 12 April 5, 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment City Council Meeting The goals, principles, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan address various subjects including community character, infrastructure, quality of life, growth management, protection of natural resources, open space and rural character. The Plan also addresses the desired amount of business development and employment opportunities. Since the Comprehensive Plan was approved, a number of projects were approved which reduced the amount of Business guided land in the City, including: AutoMotorPlex, OSI expansion, Okalee Senior Living, Weston Woods Comprehensive Plan Amendment, BAPS temple, and Adam’s Pest Control office. Remaining land for additional business development of any scale is fairly limited. The owner of the largest parcel (50 acre water tower parcel on Willow Drive) has not indicated any interest in development at this time. The following table and map identify remaining property which has been identified for Business development in the City. Business land is identified as purple in the Future Land Use map. Site Net Acres Notes 1 Willow water tower ~4205 Willow Dr. 50 No development interest indicated 2 St. Louis Park Investment ~4705 Willow Dr. 20 3 South of Loram ~3800 Arrowhead Dr. 21 EAW pending for development 4 KD Supply/Recycling ~2200 Prairie Dr. 22 Disturbed site; portions wooded 5 North of OSI ~ 4205 Arrowhead Dr. 10 6 TC Outdoor 2705 Highway 55 7 4 smaller sites 14 Approx 2-4 acres each 144 Cates Industrial Park Page 4 of 12 April 5, 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment City Council Meeting Historical Planning of Property The planned future land use of the property has evolved with each recent decennial Comprehensive Plan update. • 2000 update – property was guided “Urban Commercial” and staged for potential immediate development within the 2000-2020 MUSA. • 2010 update – property was guided “Mixed Use” and staged for potential development in the 2021-2025 MUSA • 2020 update – property is guided “Future Development Area” as described above The applicant’s narrative and attached letter from their attorney references an agreement between Wally and Erica Cates (previous owners) and the City pertaining to settling a condemnation action in 2000. The City agreed to reguide the southern parcel (south of Cates Ranch Drive, approximately 43% of the subject site) to Urban Commercial as part of the consideration for the acquisition. The City designated the southern parcel as Urban Commercial and allowed for immediate development in the 2000 Comp Plan. The City also designated the northern parcel Urban Commercial at the same time, although this was not required by the agreement. A letter from the applicant’s attorney related to the agreement is attached to their narrative, along with a copy of the agreement for reference. The historical Comprehensive Plan changes and the fact that the City agreed to guide a portion of the subject property as Urban Commercial may be factors for consideration. The City Attorney has provided the City Council with their legal opinion of the relevancy and implications, if any, of the 2000 agreement. Environmental Assessment Worksheet Chapter 4410 of Minnesota Rules regulates Environmental Review and requires mandatory completion of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for development of 300,000 square feet or more of warehouse/light industrial space within a city of Medina’s size. The purpose of an EAW is to develop an analysis and overview of the potential impacts of the development, determine if the project will cause any significant environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated through normal review processes, and provide information for planning and design. The EAW was completed at the end of 2021 and reviewed by relevant agencies in early 2022. The City Council adopted the Findings of Fact and Record of Decision on the EAW on March 1, 2022 and determined that the project does not necessitate an Environmental Impact Statement. Transportation Staff believes transportation is the primary infrastructure considerations for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The applicant has submitted a traffic analysis, which has been reviewed and updated by the City Engineer. Cates Industrial Park Page 5 of 12 April 5, 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment City Council Meeting In the long-term, the analysis found that expansion of Highway 55 to dual-lanes in each direction through the Willow Drive intersection would result in acceptable movements at the Willow Drive and Highway 55 intersection. Expansion of Highway 55 has not yet been programmed by MnDOT and would not be anticipated for at least a decade. As such, the traffic analysis reviewed whether improvements to the local transportation network could be implemented to function without assuming an expansion to Highway 55. The proposed site is projected to generate most of the traffic on Willow Drive and the traffic analysis acknowledges the existing system is insufficient for the proposed development and that improvements are necessary to support the proposed development. If the Comprehensive Plan is amended, this development would accelerate when such improvements would be necessary. The applicant has proposed to make the following improvements at their cost to Willow Drive and Chippewa Road as shown on the proposed concept plan and identified by the traffic analysis: 1) Capacity improvements at the Willow Dr./Highway 55 intersection – extend left-turn lane from Hwy 55 to Chippewa Road to provide more stacking 2) Turn lanes at Willow Dr./Chippewa Rd. intersection 3) Improvements on Willow Drive up to any access for the site With the improvements noted above, the traffic analysis projects that there should not be issues on local streets for most of the day. The primary issue was projected at peak evening rush hour. The traffic analysis found that at the p.m. peak, it is projected that vehicles waiting to turn left onto Highway 55 may back-up through the intersection of Chippewa Road and may need to wait two light cycles to clear the intersection. If traffic is backed-up at Willow Drive, staff assumed that some drivers would likely find alternatives and reviewed potential impacts to other intersections. Staff assumed up to 40% of the traffic may instead utilize Chippewa Road east to Arrowhead Drive as an alternative during the p.m. peak. If this occurred, it improves operations at the Willow Drive/Hwy 55 intersection and did not appear to cause issues on Chippewa Road and Arrowhead Drive to Highway 55. MnDOT has requested installation of a traffic monitoring camera as a condition of the development. This would allow review of the operations of the intersection and may allow for adjustments to the timing of the light. The northern 640 feet of Willow Drive is currently gravel. Staff recommends that provision be made for paving of Willow Drive adjacent to the site. Concept Plan Review The applicant submitted a conceptual site plan and architectural renderings as part of their narrative for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment application. The applicant designed the site according to the Business (B) zoning district. The requirements of the district are summarized below, although staff did not conduct a complete review based on the limited information submitted. Cates Industrial Park Page 6 of 12 April 5, 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment City Council Meeting Although the plan would likely need some adjustments when formal review occurs, the scale and layout of the proposed concept appear to be generally consistent with the requirements of the B zoning district. The proposed concept includes two buildings sitting back-to-back in the northern portion of the site and a third building running east-to-west in the southern portion of the site. The office or “front” of the buildings are oriented towards the outside of the site, with loading docks proposed toward the center. The B zoning district emphasizes design which limits loading docks to the exterior of the site. Primary access points to the sites are proposed off a new roadway (Cates Ranch Drive) between the buildings, east of Willow Drive. Secondary driveways are also proposed to Willow Drive and Chippewa Road. Staff recommends that the street and access alignment be reevaluated if any formal application is submitted to better align with existing and future access points. Two homes to the east of the site currently use Cates Ranch Drive as an access. Provisions will need to be made for access to these sites through the proposed development site. The proposed layout would provide opportunity for the shared driveway to access the new roadway in its existing location. The following table compares the concept plan with the dimensional standards of the B district. B District Requirement Proposed Minimum Front Yard Setback 40 feet 80 feet Minimum Rear/Side Yard Setback 25 feet 190 feet (north) Setback from Residential 100 feet 190 feet (north) 220 feet (east) Minimum Parking Setbacks Front Yard 25 feet 40 feet Rear and Side Yard 15 feet 160 feet Residential 100 feet 160 feet Maximum Hardcover 70% Not provided Building Height (sprinkled) 45 feet 40 feet Architectural Design The B zoning district requires the following architectural standards. The concept plan does not provide sufficient information to review for compliance, but the Planning Commission and City Council are encouraged to provide feedback based on these requirements, to the extent possible. Materials The BP district requires: “All exterior building materials shall be durable and meet the following standards: (a) A minimum of 20 percent of the building exterior shall be brick, natural stone, stucco (not Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product), copper, or glass. (b) A maximum of 80 percent may be decorative concrete, split face (rock face) decorative block, and/or decorative pre-cast concrete panels. Decorative concrete shall be color impregnated in earth tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a high quality terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine appearance. Cates Industrial Park Page 7 of 12 April 5, 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment City Council Meeting (c) A maximum of 20 percent may be wood, metal (excluding copper) or fiber cement lap siding or Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product, if used as accent materials which are integrated into the overall building design.” The conceptual renderings show primary material of precast concrete panels proposed with exposed aggregate to provide a terrazzo appearance. Accent materials are proposed to be brick and metal. Modulation The business districts require: “Buildings shall be designed to avoid long, monotonous building walls. Modulation may include varying building height, building setback, or building materials/design. Generally, a particular building elevation shall include a minimum of one element of modulation per 100 feet of horizontal length, or portion thereof. Alternative architectural or site elements and designs may also be approved by the city which achieve the purpose of reducing the visual impact of long building walls.” Staff recommends that the building layout be updated to provide horizontal modulation of the proposed buildings if a formal application is made. Fenestration and Transparency The business districts require: “Building elevations which face a public street shall include generous window coverage. Alternative architectural elements may be approved by the city when windows are not practical.” Multi-sided Architecture The business districts require: “Any rear or side building elevation which faces a public street or a residential zoning district shall include design and architectural elements of a quality generally associated with a front façade. The elevation(s) shall be compatible with the front building elevation.” In-depth architectural review would occur at the time of a formal application. The proposed layout attempts to orient the “front” of structures toward existing street and residential property, which is consistent with multi-sided architecture and allows opportunities for more windows to the exterior. Wetlands/Floodplain The concept proposes impacts to approximately 1.6 acres of the 5 acres of wetlands on the site. Any impact would be subject to review by the Technical Evaluation Panel and require mitigation. Staff recommends that the site layout be updated to reduce wetland impacts. The City’s wetland buffer regulations would be triggered by any formal application. FEMA floodplain maps do not identify any floodplains with 1% annual chance of flooding. Sewer/Water The applicant proposes to add the subject site to the Metropolitan Urban Service Area and to connect to the City’s sewer and water system. The City Engineer and Public Works has not Cates Industrial Park Page 8 of 12 April 5, 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment City Council Meeting identified significant concerns related to capacity within the overall City sewer and water systems. Improvements to the adjacent systems will be necessary to support the development. Staff recommends that a 12” watermain be connected from Willow Drive to the existing water system located southeast of the site along Chippewa Road at Okalee. The applicant has not submitted full utilities plans, but it appears that a sanitary sewer lift station will be necessary to serve the buildings on the northern portion of the site. The City has previously identified the need for a lift station to serve future Business property west of Willow Drive, and preliminary analysis anticipated to serve the subject site in the long-term, since it is designated as FDA and may be considered for development in future Comprehensive Plan updates. The City has budgeted to construct the lift station as a public improvement, which would be funded with sewer connection fees. Staff recommends that land for the lift station be required as a condition of development. Staff would also recommend extension of a sewer main as deep as possible to the east. Tree Preservation/Landscaping There are existing trees around the buildings in the southwest corner of the property but no wooded areas. Any future application would need to provide information related to tree preservation requirements. The Business district requires minimum tree planting based on the perimeter of the site and also requires a buffer with an opacity of 0.5 adjacent to residential property along the north and east. The concept plan appears to fall short of the required landscaping 12’ adjacent to the building and also the 8% landscaping requirement within parking lots and loading areas. Staff recommends that these requirements be addressed if any formal application is submitted. Stormwater/Grading The applicant has not submitted grading or stormwater plans, but concept plans do identify large stormwater ponds throughout the site. Any future development application will be subject to City and Elm Creek Watershed regulations related to volume control, rate control, water quality and other stormwater management requirements. Parks and Trails The City’s Parks and Trails plan do not identify future park or trail improvements in the vicinity of the subject site. However, when considering future land use within the Comprehensive Plan, staff believes it is important to consider how the change would impact park and trail needs. Property identified as FDA is anticipated to be designated for development at some point in the long-term future, and the City would determine appropriate park and trail needs when it is designated. It is important to note that additional park and trail improvements will likely be identified when and if FDA property is designated for development in the future. Cates Industrial Park Page 9 of 12 April 5, 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment City Council Meeting The Comprehensive Plan identifies a search area for a neighborhood park to the east of the site and the City is in the process of purchasing property at 2120 Chippewa Road for this park. The Park Commission did not believe an additional park is likely necessary in the area. In terms of trail improvements, staff recommends that private trail connections be incorporated into the plans between the buildings which provide opportunities to connect to adjacent sites. Staff believes it may be worthwhile to require a trail easement connecting Chippewa Road to Cates Ranch Drive for a potential trail when the property to the east develops. The City of Corcoran recommended that a trail connection also be considered between the project and the Corcoran boundary. This comment was received after Park Commission review, and the Park Commission did not include that connection. Staff had not included a connection to Willow Drive or north to the Corcoran boundary as a recommendation and the Park Commission did not add these connections to its recommendation. Staff does recommend that sufficient right-of-way be required adjacent to roadways for future non-motorized transportation options and that the grading of the street and site improvements be designed to make it easier to retrofit future bikeable shoulders, sidewalks, or trails adjacent to streets. Jurisdictional Comments Staff routed the proposed Amendment to affected jurisdictions as required by the Metropolitan Council at the end of 2021. The City received comments from the following jurisdictions, which are summarized below and attached for reference. Staff has recommended conditions to address most of these comments if the project were to move ahead. • City of Corcoran o Recommended significant buffering and screening from rural property to the north in Corcoran o Consider extension of trail north to Corcoran line o The wetland extending north from the site into Corcoran is subject to a floodplain without an established Base Flood Elevation. Requested the BFE be established with review of this development and no impacts o Willow Drive is gravel in Corcoran. All reasonable measures should be implement to ensure development traffic goes south o Requested a stub for potential future interconnect with Corcoran water system. • MnDOT o Requested provisions for pan, tilt, zoom (PTZ) camera to be installed as condition of development o Noted importance of Chippewa Road to Arrowhead Drive to provide alternative access to Highway 55 o Noted that only minor signal timing adjustments may be considered for the signal at Willow Drive and Highway 55 • Elm Creek Watershed o Noted potential floodplain within the wetland on site which will need to be modeled as part of any development request. o Stressed importance of volume control to reduce cumulative effect on downstream waterbodies o Described anticipated watershed permitting requirements for future development request Cates Industrial Park Page 10 of 12 April 5, 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment City Council Meeting Staff Comments The City has the highest level of discretion when considering proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. The goals, principles, and objectives of the Comp Plan should provide guidance when considering any amendment. Infrastructure is one of the primary considerations of the Comprehensive Plan. It appears that the proposed amendment would not cause significant issues with the City’s sewer and water systems. Staff recommends that the City’s parks and trails needs be evaluated based on the proposed change of land use and improvements be required as necessary. The primary potential infrastructure issue identified by staff relates to transportation. The proposed amendment would contribute more than twice the otherwise projected traffic onto Willow Drive. It is important to note that the property is guided FDA, which indicates that development may be considered in future Comp Plan updates. An amendment at this time would accelerate any impacts. Without such improvements, development would appear to be premature. The applicant proposes to construct improvements to Willow Drive and Chippewa Road at their cost. This would remove the potential obligation from the City needing to consider those improvements at some point in the future. Sewer and water improvements are also proposed in connection with the development, including dedicating land for the sanitary sewer lift station which is necessary for this site and also other nearby properties and the extension of a 12” watermain to the east. Along with infrastructure considerations, the Comprehensive Plan also addresses matters related to community character, growth management, employment, tax base, and protection of natural resources and rural areas. The Planning Commission and City Council should carefully consider these (sometimes competing) interests. Land designated for Business development is fairly limited within the City. Only a few sites have over 20 net acres to support a larger project. If the Planning Commission and Council desire to provide more opportunities for larger development, the subject site appears to be a comparatively good candidate, provided the transportation needs noted above are addressed. The City’s utility system is planned to support development in this area at some point in the future. Expanding the MUSA in any location within the City has the potential for incongruence with adjacent rural land uses. Site layout, landscaping, and street planning will need to mitigate potential impacts. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the request at their January 11, 2022 meeting. An excerpt from the meeting minutes is attached for reference. No one appeared at the hearing or provided comments. Some Commissioners acknowledged the relative lack of available land for business development in the City and saw value to providing additional opportunity. Commissioners also discussed the adjacent business use west of Willow Drive. Cates Industrial Park Page 11 of 12 April 5, 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment City Council Meeting Some Commissioners expressed hesitation of opening up additional property out of the FDA into development and questioned whether it was advisable to designate more property for warehouse and industrial use when the specific users are not known. Planning Commission members generally all emphasized the importance of ensuring that local street improvements be provided to support the proposed project. Following discussion, the Planning Commission voted 4-3 to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment subject to following conditions: 1) The Comprehensive Plan Amendment shall not become effective until reviewed and authorized by the Metropolitan Council pursuant to Minnesota Statues 462 and 473 and execution of a development agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City has been executed which guarantees construction of all necessary improvements identified to support the development. 2) The applicant shall submit a financial guarantee sufficient to ensure completion of the public improvements necessary to support the proposed development, including improvements to Willow Drive and Chippewa Road. 3) Any future application shall be subject to all relevant City regulations and policies. 4) Any future application shall be subject to Wetland Conservation Act Replacement Plan approval and meet all requirements of the wetland protection ordinance. 5) The applicant shall provide land necessary for construction of the sanitary sewer lift station. 6) The street improvements for Willow Drive and Chippewa Road adjacent to the site and at the intersection of Highway 55 shall be constructed as part of the development improvements and provisions for installation of traffic monitoring camera improvements shall be provided. Staff has also provided the following comments on the Concept Plan: 1) A substantial buffer shall be provided from adjacent rural property. The buffer shall include an appropriate combination of distance, berming, vegetation and potentially fencing. 2) Provisions shall be incorporated into the design to maintain the natural drainageways through the site. 3) The applicant shall establish base flood elevation(s) for Zone A floodplains within the site and for wetlands adjacent to the site. 4) The site plan shall be updated to reduce wetland impacts. 5) Access locations and circulations shall be improved as recommended by City staff. Site layout and circulation shall be updated to provide improved access to Chippewa Road to provide alternative routes when back-ups occur at the intersection of Willow Drive and Highway 55. 6) Provisions for pedestrian connectivity shall be provided. 7) Architectural plans shall be updated to provide additional modulation along building facades facing the exterior of the site. 8) Plans shall be updated to provide required landscaping areas adjacent to buildings and within parking lots/loading areas. 9) The applicant shall address the comments of the City Engineer. 10) Park dedication shall be provided as required by the City Council after recommendation by the Park Commission. Cates Industrial Park Page 12 of 12 April 5, 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment City Council Meeting Potential Action If the City Council believes the proposed amendment is appropriate and finds that it is consistent with the goals, principles, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, the following action could be taken: Move to direct staff to prepare resolution granting conditional approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, subject to the conditions noted in the staff report. If the Council does not find that the proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, principles, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, the following action could be taken: Move to direct staff to prepare resolution denying the Comprehensive Plan Amendment based upon the findings described by Council. Attachments 1. Excerpt from 1/11/2022 Planning Commission minutes 2. Excerpt from 1/18/2022 Park Commission minutes 3. Comprehensive Plan Information 4. Engineering Comments 5. Jurisdictional Comments (Corcoran, MnDOT, Elm Creek) 6. Applicant Narrative 7. Applicant Attorney Letter w/ 2000 agreement attached 8. Concept Plan 9. Land Use Map identifying proposed change Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 01/11/2022 Minutes 1 Public Hearing – Cates Industrial Park – Jeff and Chris Cates – Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Change Future Land Use from Future Development Area to Business and Staging to 2020 (PIDs 0411823110002, 0411823140004, and 0311823220004) Finke presented a request for a Comprehensive Plan amendment for the Cates Industrial Park. He identified the subject parcel and highlighted the surrounding property uses and future land uses. He stated that the site is guided for Future Development Area (FDA) which signifies that the property may be considered for urban development in future planning processes. He explained that for the current planning period of through 2030, the property is not anticipated for urban development. He stated that the applicant is proposing a business use within the current staging period. He explained that the proposal would be for approximately 665,000 square feet of warehouse and light industrial uses with office. He stated that the concept plan does not provide specific details for the development but is provided for context for this Comprehensive Plan amendment. He noted that if the amendment is approved, additional content would be provided during future applications for plat, site plan review, etc. He stated that information on the Comprehensive Plan was included in the Commission packet. He explained that the goals within the plan provide guidance as the City considers amendments to the plan. He reviewed the goals most relevant to the question posed this evening. He stated that staff provided a review of the available business property within Medina and are open for development at this time. He noted that the supply of property for business development has reduced since the City adopted its Comprehensive Plan. He noted that some of the larger sites do not have development interest from the property owners. He also reviewed the historical planning for this property going back to 2000. He provided details on an agreement from 2000 with the previous landowner, noting that the City Attorney is reviewing that with the City Council and the Commission should concentrate on the broader land use question. He reviewed the details of the concept plan provided with the application. He noted that another important consideration is related to infrastructure providing details on transportation. Piper asked if the warehouses would be served by large 18-wheeler trucks. Finke commented that the majority of the traffic would be employees but there would also be a fair amount of freight traffic. Piper asked if Cates Ranch Drive would have to be able to handle that kind of vehicle weight. Finke confirmed that the new internal street would be constructed to City standards in connection with the development. Piper asked if Willow Drive, in its current design, is capable of handling that traffic. Finke replied that there would be improvements for Willow Drive as noted in the staff report and summarized those improvements. He stated that many of those improvements would be required absent the Comprehensive Plan amendment request as there is other business property in the vicinity that could be developed. Piper asked if this would necessitate a traffic light at Highway 55. Finke replied that there already is a traffic light at that intersection. Jacob asked if there is currently a turn lane from Highway 55 to Willow. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 01/11/2022 Minutes 2 Finke replied that there are turn lanes from Highway 55 onto Willow and from Willow onto Highway 55. He stated that as mentioned there would be capacity issues for the turn lane from Willow onto eastbound Highway 55. He stated that while the fix would seem to be to add an additional turn lane, there is only one lane for traffic on Highway 55. Peter Coyle, land use lawyer representing the Cates family, commented that this is the first step in the policy discussion to put this land into the business development status for development. He noted that the Council has previously slated this land for the development several times in the past 20 years and was only guided for FDA in the last rendition of the Comprehensive Plan at the objection of the landowner. He stated that staff identified many policy questions that will need to be worked out in time. He stated that the goal is to take advantage of a site that is very well located, in an emerging business area, served by existing utilities and is development ready in that sense. He stated that there are limited business opportunities within Medina because of the development that has occurred, and the available land designated. He stated that the traffic study completed as a part of the EAW identified the improvements that would be necessary. He stated that the goal would be to develop the site in phases from south to north in a four-to-six-year development horizon that would allow them to adapt the traffic improvements. He noted that they would work with staff to ensure those improvements are done correctly and properly. He stated that the property to the west is commercial in nature while the property to the south is zoned for commercial. He stated that Highway 55 is an important corridor and for all of those reasons they believe this is a good location for new commercial activity to occur. He stated that the purpose tonight is to seek support for the policy change that would allow them to continue to submit appropriate applications. Popp asked the type of businesses that would be envisioned for the development. Coyle commented that the site plan is conceptual as they do not yet have commercial tenants in hand that they could identify tonight. He stated that an industrial park/business park concept has been provided that identifies different options. He stated that they would be looking for clean industry, low impact businesses that would provide jobs. Popp thanked the applicant for providing information on the types of jobs that could be provided. He noted that he would also be interested in the number of jobs that could be created but recognized that would be difficult at this stage in the process. Nielsen opened the public hearing at 9:38 p.m. No comments. Nielsen closed the public hearing at 9:39 p.m. Popp commented that he is unsure he is on board with the layout and how the land would be used. He stated that perhaps he would be more supportive of a business campus type or business park style of development. He stated that could lead to more greenspace and office uses versus an industrial park that would have high traffic and truck traffic and less jobs. He stated that the development also may not be as attractive for the surrounding properties, especially if the site did not stay occupied. He stated that if the City wants to look at economic development, he would support holding off on this to attract a campus setting type business. He commented that growth management is an important part of the Comprehensive Plan and stated that he does not see a reason to change the zoning from FDA at this time. He asked if the business goals of the community could still be met if this change were made and whether this change would have a domino effect on other FDA properties. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 01/11/2022 Minutes 3 Rhem stated that he visited the site today and believed that a business use would make sense in this setting. He stated that the concerns that he has relate to transportation and the potential impact that could have on the improvements that would be needed for surrounding roads. He stated that he thinks business zoning makes sense given the business use of the adjacent properties. Sedabres commented that he recognizes that the property is slated for future development but stated that he would be supportive of the change in zoning. He stated that this use makes sense, and he would be supportive. Grajczyk stated that in the past few years the Commission has mostly considered residential development. He stated that the City is always looking to bring in more businesses as that brings more people, revenue, and potential. He stated that other towns and cities have had a lot of success with business parks that have brought in a range of businesses that make the community more diverse. He stated that one of his concerns is related to traffic and wanted to ensure that the City could keep up with the best practices. Jacob echoed similar comments related to transportation and the infrastructure. He stated that he would support moving forward and exploring this further. Piper commented that she is concerned with infrastructure, transportation, and traffic. She also believed that there has been a focus on residential planning and believed this would be good for the Hamel corridor. Nielsen stated that she struggles with this request and is hesitant to change the FDA designation. She stated that there was a lot of time and input put into the Comprehensive Plan process and therefore she is hesitant to change that without knowing how that area is desired to develop. She understood the need for business development and acknowledged that there is business development in that area. Motion by Grajczyk, seconded by Rhem, to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment with the conditions. A roll call vote was performed: Grajczyk aye Jacob aye Piper nay Popp nay Rhem aye Sedabres aye Nielsen nay Motion carried. Finke stated that a presentation to the Council has not yet been scheduled and encouraged residents to check back with City staff or on the City website for a date. He stated that staff intends to present to the Park Commission at its next meeting. Medina Park Commission Excerpt from 1/19/2022 Minutes 1 CATES INDUSTRIAL PARK Finke presented a request for a Comprehensive Plan amendment for the Cates Industrial Park. He identified the subject parcel and highlighted the surrounding property uses and future land uses. He stated that the site is guided for Future Development Area (FDA) which signifies that the property may be considered for urban development in future planning processes. He explained that for the current planning period of through 2030, the property is not anticipated for urban development. He stated that the applicant is proposing a business use within the current staging period. He explained that the proposal would be for approximately 665,000 square feet of warehouse and light industrial uses with office. He stated that the concept plan does not provide specific details for the development but is provided for context for this Comprehensive Plan amendment. He noted that if the amendment is approved, additional content would be provided during future applications for plat, site plan review, etc. He noted that the project is being presented to the park commission now so that the commission can consider whether a potential land use change will necessitate additional improvements in the park and trail plan. Morrison polled the members, there were no comments or questions at this time. Chapter 2 – Vision and Community Goals Page 2 - 1 Adopted October 2, 2018 Chapter 2: VISION & COMMUNITY GOALS _______________________________________________________________________________________________ The Vision and Community Goals chapter is the heart of the Comprehensive Plan and provides the foundation from which City officials make consistent and supporting land use decisions. This chapter includes a set of general community goals that guided the creation of this Plan. The concepts in this chapter are some of the few static elements of the Comprehensive Plan. If land uses change or other infrastructure varies from the Plan, decisions will be founded in the goals set forth below. The Vision and Goals were created with the involvement of the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee (the “Steering Committee”), City officials, and residents of Medina and are broadly supported. Land use designations are subject to strong social and economic pressures to change. Accordingly, it is appropriate that such systems be periodically evaluated in light of changing social and economic conditions. As development evolves, the Vision and Goals will provide the guidance for accomplishing the vision for the future of the community even when changes are necessary to the land use plan. Detailed objectives and recommendations are contained within each of the subject chapters of this plan. Creating the Vision and Goals The residents, the Steering Committee, City officials and staff participated in the planning process for the Plan. A series of public participation meetings were conducted to introduce and solicit information from the residents of Medina. The Steering Committee held work sessions that focused on integrating the concerns and desires of the community together with accommodating growth and regional impacts. An online forum provided additional opportunity for residents to impact the Vision and Community Goals as they were formulated. In addition to land use and growth planning, the City implemented open space, natural resources, and infrastructure planning. The goals which guided this process are integrated into this chapter. Each element of this plan was developed with assistance from city officials and a diverse group of community stakeholders producing a truly representative plan. The City made a conscious decision to emphasize natural resources and open space conservation. Chapter 2 – Vision and Community Goals Page 2 - 2 Adopted October 2, 2018 Community Vision The following statement provides a vision of the community for the future and the resultant goals and strategies. Medina is a community united by a common goal: to sustain and enhance the quality of life of its residents. Medina will protect its significant natural resources and open space throughout the City, while honoring its rural heritage and fostering safe and well-designed neighborhoods, places of recreation and destinations for citizens to gather. Development within the City will be commensurate with available transportation systems, municipal services and school capacity. Community Goals The following Community Goals are derived from the Vision Statement and inform objectives and strategies throughout the various aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. • Preserve rural vistas, open spaces, and wetlands in all parts of the community to promote the rural character of Medina. • Protect and enhance the environment and natural resources throughout the community. • Encourage and incent innovative and environmentally friendly approaches to planning, engineering and development. • Expand urban services only as necessary to accommodate regionally forecasted residential growth, desired business opportunities and achievement of other Community Goals. Such development and growth shall be at a sustainable pace proportionate with capacity of schools and transportation, water supply and wastewater infrastructure available to the City. • Spread development so that it is not geographically concentrated during particular timeframes. • Promote public and private gathering places and civic events that serve the entire community. • Preserve and expand trails and parks to provide community recreational facilities, connect neighborhoods, and encourage healthy lifestyles of its residents. • Provide opportunities for a diversity of housing at a range of costs to support residents at all stages of their lives. • Encourage an attractive, vibrant business community that complements the residential areas of the City. • Maintain its commitment to public safety through support of the City’s police department and coordinate with its contracted volunteer fire departments. • Manage the City through prudent budgeting processes, retaining a skilled and efficient staff and long-range planning and financial management. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 4 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 4 While these ordinance standards help protect solar access, it is not possible for every part of a building or lot to obtain unobstructed solar access. Mature trees, topography, and the location of structures can limit solar access. However, on most properties the rooftop of the principal building would be free of shading by adjacent structures. Therefore, the majority of property owners in the City could utilize solar energy systems, if they so desired, as a supplement or alternative to conventional fuels. HHiissttoorriicc PPrreesseerrvvaattiioonn The City of Medina currently does not have any sites or structures listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The City of Medina has a strong interest in preserving representative portions of its history. The City previously worked with the West Hennepin Pioneer Museum to restore the Wolsfeld Family cabin which was originally built in 1856. It is thought to be one of the original homes in Medina. The City further commits to providing the following general guidelines related to historical preservation: • Partner with organizations that want to preserve historically significant areas, landmarks, and buildings in Medina; • Modify zoning regulations as necessary to help preserve areas that may be historically significant. FFuuttuurree GGeenneerraall LLaanndd UUssee PPoolliiccyy DDiirreeccttiioonn As described in the Vision Statement, the City of Medina strives to promote and protect its open spaces and natural environment. The City has historically been, and intends to continue to be, primarily a rural community. The City has planned for a limited amount of future development consistent with regional forecast and consistent with Community Goals. Future Land Use Plan Principles The Future Land Use Plan guides the development of Medina through 2040, and will be used to implement the City’s goals, strategies and policies. The Plan is guided by the Vision and Community Goals as furthered by the following principles: Development Patterns and Neighborhood Form • Encourage open spaces, parks and trails in all neighborhood developments. Surveys indicate that a high quality of life is found when residents have visual access to green spaces. • Create neighborhoods with a variety of housing types that are well connected with roads, trails or sidewalks. • Maintain the integrity of rural neighborhoods and promote development patterns consistent with existing rural residential development. • Recognize neighborhood characteristics and promote new development compatible in scale, architectural quality and style with existing neighborhoods. • Stage residential growth to minimize the amount of adjacent developments which occur within the same time period. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 5 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 5 • Guide density to areas with proximity to existing infrastructure and future infrastructure availability. • Concentrate higher density development near service oriented businesses to help promote walkability. • Consider planned development in surrounding communities when making land use decisions in the City. Road Patterns • Recognize regional highway capacity and planned improvements, along with use forecasts, as major factors in planning for growth and land use changes. • Establish collector streets with good connections through the community’s growth areas. • Promote trails and sidewalk access near roads and thoroughfares to encourage multi- modal transportation choices. • Consider opportunities to improve north-south travel within the City. Open Spaces and Natural Resources • Preserve natural resources throughout the community and provide educational opportunities to residents to help them understand the value of natural areas. • Preserve open spaces and natural resources. • Protect wooded areas and encourage improvement of existing resources and reforestation. Evaluate existing woodland protections and supplement as necessary. • Support the guidelines identified in the Open Space Report to preserve the City’s natural systems. Business Districts and Commercial Areas • Focus service businesses and development near urban residential densities and along primary transportation corridors. • Provide connections between residents and commercial areas and promote businesses within mixed-use areas. • Work to create job opportunities in the community for Medina residents to reduce traffic and commuting demands. • Emphasize service and retail uses which serve the needs of the local community and provide opportunities for the community to gather. • Support business development with a corporate campus style which provides open spaces and protects natural resources. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 6 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 6 TThhee GGuuiiddee PPllaann Medina's Future Land Use Plan, Map 5-3, maintains Medina’s rural character and protects the City's natural resources while accommodating limited growth and development which is consistent with the City’s Vision, Community Goals and Land Use Principles. Table 5-2 below demonstrates the expected 2040 land uses in the community. TABLE 5-2 FUTURE LAND USE PLAN Future Land Use (2040) Gross Acreage % Net Acreage % Rural Residential 8,402.2 49.1% 6,015.3 35.1% Agriculture 222.7 1.3% 174.5 1.0% Future Development Area 671.9 3.9% 547.9 3.2% Low Density Residential 1172.5 6.8% 865.7 5.1% Medium Density Residential 58.5 0.3% 46.2 0.3% High Density Residential 29.6 0.2% 25.7 0.2% Mixed Residential 137.1 0.8% 94.1 0.6% Uptown Hamel 45.0 0.3% 41.2 0.2% Commercial 254.2 1.5% 197.6 1.2% Business 704.6 4.1% 471.9 2.8% Rural Commercial 67.5 0.4% 47.6 0.3% Institutional 270.2 1.6% 194.0 1.1% Parks, Recreation, Open Space 2,771.5 16.2% 1,971.2 11.5% Private Recreation 343.1 2.0% 297.5 1.7% Closed Sanitary Landfill 192.2 1.1% 124.7 0.7% Right-of-Way 673.1 3.9% 616.9 3.6% Total Acres 16,015.9 11,732.0 Lakes and Open Water* 1,104.6 6.5% 1,104.6 6.5% Wetlands and Floodplain 4,283.9 25.0% Total City 17,120.5 17,120.5 * Lakes and Open Water amounts include areas adjacent to lakes which are not included in Hennepin County parcel data and exclude un-meandered lakes. The Growth and Development Map (Map 5-4) highlights areas within the City in which a change of land use is contemplated by the Future Land Use plan. The map also highlights wetland areas within Medina which significantly affect land planning, development, and infrastructure decisions. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 7 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 7 Future Land Use Designations Rural Residential (RR) identifies areas for low-intensity uses, such as rural residential, hobby farms, agricultural, horticulture, conservation of ecologically significant natural resources and passive recreation. Density within the RR land use shall be no more than one lot per 10 acres and the area is not planned to be served by urban services during the timeframe covered by this Plan. Agricultural (AG) identifies areas which are planned for long-term agricultural uses. Density within the land use can be no more than one lot per 40 acres which will not be served by urban services. Property within this land use is eligible to be part of the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Program. Future Development Area (FDA) identifies areas which could potentially be planned for future urban development in the City that will be provided municipal sewer and water services. This area will remain rural unless and until designated for urban services in a future Comprehensive Plan update. The purpose of the FDA designation is to communicate the future planning intentions to the community. This designation is tentative and depends greatly on future infrastructure improvements, including to regional highway capacity. Low Density Residential (LDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 2.0 units per acre and 3.0.units per acre which are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The primary use in this area is single- and two-family residential development. Medium Density Residential (MDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 5.0 and 7.0 units per acre that are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The primary uses in this designation will be a mix of housing such as single-family residential, twin homes, town homes, row homes, and small multiple family buildings. High Density Residential (HDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 12.0 and 15.0 units per acre that are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The primary uses will include town homes, apartment buildings and condominiums which should incorporate some open space or an active park. Mixed Residential (MR) identifies residential land uses that may be developed with a variety of housing styles at an overall average density between 3.5 and 4.0 units per net acre, within which a minimum of the units equivalent to 1.0 unit per acre are required to be developed at higher densities above 8.0 units per acre. Uses within the MR land use are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The land use provides flexibility for the type of housing to be developed, including detached single family, twin homes, townhomes and multiple family buildings. The MR land use will allow for different types of housing to be developed in coordination with each other or independently, provided the objectives related to overall density and minimum number of higher density housing units can be achieved within a defined area. Uptown Hamel (UH) the Uptown Hamel land use allows residential and commercial uses to be mixed on adjacent sites and to be mixed within the same building or property. Residential development in this designation may be between 4.0 and 15.0 units per acre. The Uptown Hamel area is served by urban services. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 8 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 8 Commercial (C) provides areas for highway oriented businesses and retail establishments including commercial, office and retail uses. These uses are concentrated along the arterial corridors and are served or will be served by urban services. Business (B) provides opportunities for corporate campus uses including office, warehouse, and light industrial. This designation identifies larger tracts of land that are suitable for office and business park developments and are served or will be served by urban services. Rural Commercial (RC) identifies commercial land uses which are not served by urban services, but rather by individual wells and septic systems. The scale of development in this land use shall be limited to protect water resources. Institutional (INST) identifies existing public, semi-public, and non-profit uses such as governmental, cemeteries, religious, educational and utilities. Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) identifies publicly owned or permanently conserved land which is used for park, recreational, or open space purposes. Private Recreation (PREC) identifies areas that are currently used for outdoor recreational uses which are held under private ownership but are not publicly maintained. Limited numbers of residential uses may be included or have previously been developed within this land use designation, accounting for no more than 10% of the land area. Density within the residential portion of the use shall be between 2.0 and 3.0 units per net acre where urban services are available and one unit per 10 acres where services are not available. The City does not anticipate additional residential development within the land use. Closed Sanitary Landfill (SL) identifies an existing closed sanitary landfill. The Woodlake Landfill is owned by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) as part of Minnesota’s Closed Landfill Program. The MPCA has jurisdiction over land use regulations of the landfill and has made available a description of the types, locations, and potential movement of hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants, or decomposition gases related to the facility in its Closed Landfill Plan. The City hereby incorporates such information and the City will provide such information as required by law. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 10 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 10 LLaanndd UUssee PPoolliicciieess bbyy AArreeaa The following section provides policies for land use designations and is categorized into generalized subsections. The policies for each category as provided below directly support the Community Goals and Land Use Principles. These designations are generalized land uses and are not specific zoning districts. The City will update the zoning ordinance and applicable codes to be consistent with the land use plan and designations identified in this section. The planning process revealed a strong interest in promoting high quality, sustainable development in the City. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) process for large scale or master plan types of development, regardless of whether they are residential, commercial or mixed-uses will be available and will be supported through zoning. RRuurraall DDeessiiggnnaattiioonnss The rural designations include Agricultural, Rural Residential and Future Development Area. A large percentage of the community falls into these categories. The purpose of these designations is to provide low-intensity land uses, such as rural residential, farming, hobby farms, horticulture, conservation of natural and ecologically significant natural resources and passive recreation. This area will not be provided with water or sewer service during the timeframe covered by this Plan. A significant segment of this area consists of large, rural parcels with single-family homes. The City recognizes that such low-density, development will continue to be a desired housing alternative. The City's goal is to maintain the rural character of this area. The Metropolitan Council System Statement shows the majority of this area as Diversified Rural, and the City utilizes the Rural Residential designation to be consistent with the System Statement. The Metropolitan Council has identified a significant portion of Medina’s rural area in the Long-term Sewer Service Area (LTSSA) for the Blue Lake wastewater facility. The Metropolitan Council designates the LTSSA for the possibility of extension of urban services in the long-term, beyond 25 years in the future. Medina is required to identify the LTSSA in its Comprehensive Plan. The Metropolitan Council’s LTSSA is identified in Map 5-5. The Metropolitan Council states that the LTSSA is intended to provide opportunities to efficiently extend urban services to accommodate long-term growth. The City believes that much of this area does not support efficient extension of urban services and the City seeks opportunities to remove property from the LTSSA. The following factors affect the efficiency of providing future urban services and are displayed on Map 5-6: • Wetlands, Topography, Regional Parks and Scientific Areas Wetlands occupy a significant portion of the area identified by the Metropolitan Council within the LTSSA, accounting for approximately 40% of the area. This fact, along with topographical conditions, would make the provision of wastewater service inefficient. In Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 11 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 11 addition, Baker Park and the Wolsfeld Woods Scientific and Natural Area occupy large portions of Medina’s rural area, further separating any developable areas. • Historical development patterns Much of the LTSSA was developed with large-lot residential neighborhoods prior to the Metropolitan Council’s LTSSA designation. These properties tend to include large homes with comparatively high home values, making the likelihood of redevelopment with urban services costly. The Metropolitan Council seeks density lower than 1 unit per 10 acres for efficient extension of wastewater service. As evidenced on Map 5-6, the vast majority of the LTSSA within Medina has been previously developed in a pattern that is denser than 1 unit per 10 buildable acres. As a result, much of the LTSSA does not provide opportunity for efficient extension of wastewater service by the Metropolitan Council’s policy. • Distance between regional infrastructure and City infrastructure The Metropolitan Council would need to extend wastewater service into the southern area of Medina if development were to occur in the future. The City’s primary municipal water system is in the northern portion of Medina. One of these services would need to be extended a great distance in order to be provided in connection with the other, or the City would need to establish a separate water system. Either alternative would be costly and would not be efficient. In discussions with Metropolitan Council staff, the City has identified approximately 730 acres to be removed from the LTSSA in the southern portion of the City, because a similar acreage in the northwest corner of the City was added to the Blue Lake wastewater facility service area. The City will continue to seek opportunities to remove property from the LTSSA because of the factors noted above. The City’s Open Space Report proposes several different implementation techniques for allowing open space development and planning to maintain rural character and simultaneously preserve significant natural resources. This result may take the form of innovative developments that clusters smaller lots on larger parcels with permanently conserved open space. Such innovative arrangements can help preserve the City’s natural resources, open space and rural character, while still maintaining an average overall density of ten acres per unit. Medina’s wetlands, lakes, scattered woodlands and soil conditions prevent smaller, unsewered lot development, but are ideal for low-density rural housing. Medina's policy in the permanent rural area is to keep strict soil requirements for septic sites, but allow flexibility for Open Space design developments and to ensure that the permanent rural area will remain rural by eliminating the need for future extension of a sanitary sewer service to replace failing systems. Objectives: 1. Allow low-density development in the Rural Residential Area including innovative arrangements of homes that preserve open space and natural resources. 2. Encourage conservation of open space, farms and ecologically significant natural resources in the rural areas. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 12 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 12 3. Enforce stringent standards for the installation and maintenance of permanent, on-site sewage disposal systems. 4. Allow public facilities and services, such as parks and trail systems, if compatible with rural service area development. 5. Allow land uses, such as home-based businesses, hobby farms, horse stables, nurseries and other smaller-scale rural activities, which will not conflict with adjoining residential development. 6. Regulate noise, illumination, animals, and odors as needed to maintain public health and safety. 7. Maintain a maximum density of one unit per forty acres for property in the Agricultural land use. 8. Maintain a maximum density of one unit per ten acres for new development in the Rural Residential and Future Development Area land use. 9. Consider exceptions to maximum density standards for open space developments that protect natural features and put land into permanent conservation. Within the Metropolitan Council’s long term sewer service area (reference Map 5-5), these exceptions will be allowed to result in development with a density in excess of one unit per ten gross acres if consistent with the Metropolitan Council’s Flexible Residential Development Guidelines. 10. Urban services will not be provided to the Agricultural, Rural Residential, or Future Development Area land uses during this planning cycle. 11. Require preservation of natural slopes, wetlands, woodlands and other significant natural characteristics. 12. Require that lots contain adequate soil types and conditions as defined in the City's on-site septic system requirements. 13. Protect property within the Future Development Area designation from subdivision and development by requiring ghost plats for subdivisions so that future urban expansion is not compromised. 14. Reduce impervious surfaces where possible by applying low impact design standards and encourage innovative materials and plans that reduce runoff. 15. Encourage and incentivize landowners to participate in the protection and conservation of significant natural resources. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 17 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 17 Business Uses The following objectives refer to business land uses that are connected to or planned for urban services. Businesses in this use generally include office complexes, business park development, warehouse and light industrial opportunities. Objectives: 1. Require preservation of natural slopes, wetlands, woodlands, and other significant natural characteristics of the property. 2. Encourage businesses that benefit the local community by providing employment opportunities utilizing high quality design, and having limited impact on public services. 3. Consider permitting uses such as nursing homes and assisted living facilities where suitable, subject to appropriate requirements related to density, ensuring compatibility between uses, and preventing the use from being predominantly independent-living residential in nature. These uses are expected to occupy a very small proportion of Business land. Residential density is estimated to be between 5-20 units per net acre, but flexibility will be considered based upon the mix of nursing home, assisted living, memory care, independent living units, and other uses proposed within a development. 4. Regulate the impact of development along the border between business and residentially guided areas to ensure that business uses have a minimal impact on residential areas. 5. Regulate construction to ensure high quality, energy and resource efficient buildings and to promote such Green Building standards as LEED Certifications or the State of Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines: Buildings, Benchmarks and Beyond (B-3) standards. 6. Encourage construction that enhances the visual appeal of TH 55 corridor and the rural vistas and open spaces of the City. 7. Create or update standards that promote a more rural appearance, or create campus style developments that protect ecologically significant areas and natural features. 8. Require frontage roads that do not directly access arterial roadways and limit access points to collector and arterial roadways. 9. Use the site plan review process to ensure that commercial and industrial uses are compatible with neighboring future and existing uses, and with the adjoining public streets and highways. PUD’s may be used to help accomplish this policy. 10. Emphasize pedestrian safety. 11. Require utilities to be placed underground wherever possible for reasons of aesthetic enhancement and safety. 12. Regulate noise, illumination, and odors as needed to maintain public health and safety. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 18 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 18 Staging Plan The staging plan is tied to infrastructure plans, including water, wastewater and transportation, to ensure that growth and development are commensurate with services necessary to support new residents and businesses in an efficient and cost-effective manner. The staging plan, Map 5-5, utilizes flexible staging boundaries to direct where and when development should proceed within the City and is built on the following principles: • Growth should encompass a balance of land uses to provide residential and business areas for development throughout the planning period. The staging plan also is intended to reduce concentration of development within a location during a particular timeframe. • The staging plan identifies staged increments of 5-year periods and provides some flexibility between adjacent staging periods. Development shall be limited to a maximum of two years prior to the existing staging period, and will be tied to an incentive based points system. Such flexibility will not be permitted for new high- density residential development to finalize prior to 2021 as deemed necessary by the Metropolitan Council to ensure sufficient land is available at higher densities from 2021- 2030. Table 5-5 describes the net acreage of the various land uses by Staging Period. The following table describes the corresponding number of residential units which could be developed upon property within each Staging Period. The numbers below do not include several lots that have been approved for development, but are not yet constructed, which is why the capacity noted below differs slightly from the forecasts noted in Chapter 3. Although most of the property staged for development is available in earlier timeframes, the City anticipates that actual growth will be more linear as described in the forecasts in Chapter 3. TABLE 5-4 STAGING PLAN – RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY Time Period Total Residential Units High Density Residential Units 2018-2021 345 32 2021-2025 161 161 2025-2030 464 94 2030-2035 0 2035-2040 47 Total 1,017 287 Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 19 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 19 TABLE 5-5 STAGING PLAN – NET ACRES Future Land Use Existing 2017 Change 2018-2021 2021 Change 2021-2025 2025 Change 2025-2030 2030 Change 2030-2035 2035 Change 2035-2040 2040 Rural Residential 6,015.3 0.0 6,015.3 0.0 6,015.3 0.0 6,015.3 0.0 6,015.3 0.0 6,015.3 Agriculture 174.5 0.0 174.5 0.0 174.5 0.0 174.5 0.0 174.5 0.0 174.5 Future Develop. Area 547.9 0.0 547.9 0.0 547.9 0.0 547.9 0.0 547.9 0.0 547.9 Future Staged Growth* 666.1 -467.7 198.4 -13.4 185.0 -161.5 23.5 0.0 23.5 -23.5 0.0 Low Density Resid. 679.3 95.5 774.8 0.0 774.8 67.4 842.2 0.0 842.2 23.5 865.7 Medium Density Res. 21.5 24.7 46.2 0.0 46.2 0.0 46.2 0.0 46.2 0.0 46.2 High Density Resid. 9.6 2.7 12.3 13.4 25.7 0.0 25.7 0.0 25.7 0.0 25.7 Mixed Residential 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 94.1 94.1 0.0 94.1 0.0 94.1 Uptown Hamel 33.2 8.0 41.2 0.0 41.2 0.0 41.2 0.0 41.2 0.0 41.2 Commercial 135.9 61.7 197.6 0.0 197.6 0.0 197.6 0.0 197.6 0.0 197.6 Business 196.8 275.1 471.9 0.0 471.9 0.0 471.9 0.0 471.9 0.0 471.9 Rural Commercial 47.6 0.0 47.6 0.0 47.6 0.0 47.6 0.0 47.6 0.0 47.6 Institutional 194.0 0.0 194.0 0.0 194.0 0.0 194.0 0.0 194.0 0.0 194.0 Parks, Rec, Open Space 1,971.2 0.0 1,971.2 0.0 1,971.2 0.0 1,971.2 0.0 1,971.2 0.0 1,971.2 Private Recreation 297.5 0.0 297.5 0.0 297.5 0.0 297.5 0.0 297.5 0.0 297.5 Closed Sanitary Landfill 124.7 0.0 124.7 0.0 124.7 0.0 124.7 0.0 124.7 0.0 124.7 Right-of-Way 616.9 0.0 616.9 0.0 616.9 0.0 616.9 0.0 616.9 0.0 616.9 • Future Staged Growth represents the acreage which is included in a future Staging Period. HIGHWAY 55 ")55 ")24 ")19 ")101 ")116 ")11 ")24 ")19 £¤12 H A M E L R D M E D I N A R D PIONEER TRL TAMARACK DR WILLOW DR HACKAMORE RD ARROWHEAD DR H O M E S T E A D T R L CHIPPEWA RD HUNTER DR PARKVIEW DR BROCKTON LN N MEANDER RD EVERGREEN RD BROCKTON LN N CHIPPEWA RD WILLOW DR WILLOW DR HUNTER DR ")55 Katrina Independence Mooney School Peter Spurzem Holy Name Half Moon Wolsfeld Krieg Winterhalter Miller Thies Ardmore Map 5-3Future Land Use Plan 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Map Date: October 2, 2018 Legend Future Land Use Rural Residential Agricultural Future Development Area Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed Residential Uptown Hamel Commercial Business Rural Commercial Institutional Private Recreational Park, Recreational, and Open Space Closed Sanitary Landfill HIGHWAY 55 ")55 ")24 ")19 ")101 ")116 ")11 ")24 ")19 £¤12 H A M E L R D M E D I N A R D PIONEER TRL TAMARACK DR WILLOW DR HACKAMORE RD ARROWHEAD DR H O M E S T E A D T R L CHIPPEWA RD HUNTER DR PARKVIEW DR BROCKTON LN N MEANDER RD EVERGREEN RD BROCKTON LN N CHIPPEWA RD WILLOW DR WILLOW DR HUNTER DR ")55 Katrina Independence Mooney School Peter Spurzem Holy Name Half Moon Wolsfeld Krieg Winterhalter Miller Thies Ardmore Map 5-4Development and Growth Plan 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Map Date: October 2, 2018 Legend Future Land Use Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed Residential Uptown Hamel Commercial Business Wetland Locations Wetland Locations HIGHWAY 55 ")55 ")24 ")19 ")101 ")116 ")11 ")24 ")19 £¤12 H A M E L R D M E D I N A R D PIONEER TRL TAMARACK DR WILLOW DR HACKAMORE RD ARROWHEAD DR H O M E S T E A D T R L CHIPPEWA RD HUNTER DR PARKVIEW DR BROCKTON LN N MEANDER RD EVERGREEN RD BROCKTON LN N CHIPPEWA RD WILLOW DR WILLOW DR HUNTER DR ")55 Katrina Independence Mooney School Peter Spurzem Holy Name Half Moon Wolsfeld Krieg Winterhalter Miller Thies Ardmore Map 5-5Staging and Growth 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Map Date: October 2, 2018 The Staging and Growth Plan allows potential flexibility for urban services up to two years prior to the indicated staging period. Such flexiblity will be considered through a evaluation system based on the extent to which a proposal exceeds general City standards. The Future Development Area identifies areas which may potentially be planned for urban services in the future beyond the term of this plan (post-2040). The Long-term Sewer Service Area is a long-term planning designation of the Metropolitan Council. It identifies areas which may be considered for potential sanitary sewer service in the future beyond the term of this Plan. Legend Urban Services Phasing Plan Developed 2018 2020 2021 2025 2035 FDA LTSSA K:\019596-000\Admin\Docs\2022-01-04 Comp Plan Amendment Review\_2022-01-04 Cates Ranch Comp Plan Amendment - WSB Engineering Comments.docx 7 0 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | S U I T E 3 0 0 | M I N N E A P O L I S , M N | 5 5 4 1 6 | 7 6 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | W S B E N G . C O M January 4, 2022 Mr. Dusty Finke City Planning Director City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: Cates Industrial Park Development Comp Plan Amendment – Concept Plan Review City Project No. LR-21-307 WSB Project No. 019596-000 Dear Mr. Finke: WSB staff have reviewed the Cates Industrial Park Development Concept plan and EAW submittal dated December 22, 2021. The applicant proposes to construct three industrial buildings totaling approximately 665,000 square feet on a 69 acres. The applicant is requesting a comprehensive plan amendment to add the property to the MUSA and be guided for Business development. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina’s general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. Site Plan & Streets 1. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building structures and required turn around space as required by the Fire Marshall. 2. City design standards require horizontal and vertical curve lengths for public roadways to meet a 30 MPH design speed, at minimum. 3. With future submittals, show the existing and proposed street right-of-way widths. 4. The plan does not include trails, sidewalks, or other pedestrian amenities. See the City Planners comments on pedestrian access and mobility requirements. 5. Any work within Hennepin County or MnDOT right of way will require a permit. The applicant shall also meet the requirements of the County’s plat review committee. 6. With future submittals provide a grading plan, utility plan, erosion/sediment control plans, SWPPP sheets, construction details plans. 7. Add typical street section(s) details to the plans meeting the City’s standard, at minimum. The final pavement section shall be designed by a registered geotechnical engineer for the specific soil conditions found on the site. 8. The City will require the extension/paving of the remaining portion of Willow Drive to the City boundary. City of Medina – Cates Industrial Park Development Comp Plan Amendment – Engineering Review January 4, 2022 Page 2 K:\019596-000\Admin\Docs\2022-01-04 Comp Plan Amendment Review\_2022-01-04 Cates Ranch Comp Plan Amendment - WSB Engineering Comments.docx Utility Plan General: 9. Any public sanitary sewer and watermain shall be encompassed by drainage and utility easements where located outside of public road right of way. Drainage and utility easements will need to allow for a 1:1 trench from the invert of the utility with a minimum of 20’ centered on the utility. 10. With future submittals show the existing/proposed watermain and sanitary sewer systems, structure locations, hydrants, and valve locations. Label the pipe size, pipe material, connection points to existing, and proposed percent grade for gravity mains. Watermain: 11. Watermain looping connections will be needed to minimize long dead-end watermain sections. Consideration of further watermain looping needs and stubs for future phases or other adjacent developments will be required and reviewed with future submittals. With this in mind, the City will require that a 12-inch watermain be extended along Chippewa Road from the existing 12-inch watermain at the intersection of Chippewa Road and Willow Drive east to the existing watermain location at Chippewa Court. In addition, a 12-inch watermain loop is required within the site, as well as a connection to the northern stub of the existing 8-inch watermain in Willow Drive. 12. Hydrant locations shall be approved of by the Fire Marshal; typically, a maximum of 250’ influence radius (approximately 400’ spacing) is required to serve the immediate residential areas. Provide an exhibit showing hydrant influence spacing. 13. The watermain connections to the building(s) shall be reviewed and approved by the City Fire Marshall. Show the location of the PIV and curb stop location on the plan(s). The City requires that domestic and fire services are separate taps from the main. A separate curb stop is required for the domestic service and gate valve (PIV) for the fire line. Sanitary Sewer: 14. With future submittals show proposed sanitary sewer service lines and invert elevations on plans; the City requires a minimum depth of 4’ from low floor elevations. A separate water/sewer service will be required for each building. 15. The City’s typical standard is to place sewer main a minimum of 10’ below the surface (18” vertical separation below the watermain). Where this depth is not feasible, the City will allow an 8’ depth; depths less than 8’ will require review on a case-by-case basis. With future submittals, indicate building low floor elevations and confirm gravity serviceability based on the existing sanitary sewer invert elevations. 16. The City prepared an engineering feasibility analyzing the existing sewer system and future improvements to the system requited to serve the Cates site. For more detailed information reference the feasibility document dated November 19, 2019. o Gravity sewer is anticipated to serve the southern proposed building within the development from the existing system along Chippewa Road. With future submittals, show how this connection will be made. o The Willow Drive/TH 55 Regional Lift Station is anticipated to serve the northern two proposed buildings. With future submittals, show a crossing under Willow Drive and connection to this future lift station on the west side of Willow Drive approximately 450 feet north of Cates Ranch Drive at an invert elevation of approximately 955 feet. Gravity sewers upstream of this lift station shall be at City of Medina – Cates Industrial Park Development Comp Plan Amendment – Engineering Review January 4, 2022 Page 3 K:\019596-000\Admin\Docs\2022-01-04 Comp Plan Amendment Review\_2022-01-04 Cates Ranch Comp Plan Amendment - WSB Engineering Comments.docx minimum grade in order to preserve depth for future gravity sewer extensions to the east. Grading and Erosion Control 17. Provide a grading plan with future submittals. Include drainage arrows on the grading plan showing the direction of flow and slope percentages. 18. Provide EOF locations for all low points inside and outside the roadway. 19. Maintain all surface grades within the minimum of 2% and maximum of 33% slopes. Vegetated swale grades shall be a minimum of 2.0%. 20. The proposed project will disturb more than one acre. Develop and include a SWPPP consistent with the MPCA CSWGP with future plan submittals. 21. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. 22. A full review of the erosion/sediment control plan and SWPPP sheets will be completed with future submittals. Traffic & Access 23. Based on the proposed site plan the anticipated traffic generation would be 2,244 daily trips, 266 AM peak hour trips and 266 PM peak hour trips, assuming 665,830 square feet of industrial development. 24. A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) was completed with the EAW dated December 22, 2021. The recommended improvements from the TIS included: o TH 55 at Willow Drive: Traffic signal timing modifications with approval by MnDOT. o TH 55 at Willow Drive: If traffic signal timing modifications are not approved, addition of a 300ft southbound Willow Drive dual left turn lanes with an eastbound TH 55 acceleration lane. o TH 55 at Willow Drive: Lengthen the westbound TH 55 acceleration lane to accommodate trucks. o Willow Drive at Chippewa Drive: Northbound Willow Drive right turn lane and westbound Chippewa Drive left turn lane. o Willow Drive: Pave north to site boundary to city standards. o Cates Ranch Drive: Pave east to site boundary to city standards. o Willow Drive Site Access: Northbound Willow Drive right turn lane o Chippewa Drive Site Access: Westbound Chippewa Drive right turn lane To improve safety and operations of the area roadways these improvements shall be included with the development construction plans. City of Medina – Cates Industrial Park Development Comp Plan Amendment – Engineering Review January 4, 2022 Page 4 K:\019596-000\Admin\Docs\2022-01-04 Comp Plan Amendment Review\_2022-01-04 Cates Ranch Comp Plan Amendment - WSB Engineering Comments.docx 25. Provide a figure showing truck movements throughout the site including the largest semi- truck and fire truck. Design driveways and circulation routes to accommodate these vehicles. 26. The project site does not include any existing parking spaces. The proposed project includes 585 vehicle parking and 219 truck parking stalls. The proposed industrial parking is consistent with city ordinances, which requires one space per 2,000 square feet gross floor area. 27. A sight line analysis should be provided to ensure that vehicles and trucks can make safe turning movements into and out of each proposed site driveway. Stormwater Management 28. The applicant will need to submit a Stormwater Management Plan and modeling consistent with Medina’s Stormwater Design Manual. 29. The development will need to meet the City’s volume control requirement to capture and retain onsite 1.1” of runoff from the net new impervious surface Infiltration is required onsite to meet the volume control requirement, but if infiltration is prohibited or not advisable due to prevailing soil conditions, follow the City’s Stormwater Design Manual for alternative credits towards the volume requirements. 30. Pretreatment in the form of ponds, forebays, filter strips, or other approved methods shall be provided for all infiltration areas. The last structure in the street prior to discharging into a pond is to be a minimum of five feet deep with a four-foot deep sump. 31. By satisfying the volume requirement the water quality requirement is considered met. 32. The applicant may want to consider using the stormwater ponds for irrigation. Credits for volume control can be given for stormwater reuse. City ordinance does not allow for municipal water system to be used for irrigation. 33. The development will need to meet the City’s rate control requirement, which states that post development discharge rates must be less than or equal to existing conditions discharge rates. 34. The City requires two feet of freeboard from structure low openings to 100-year high water levels and EOF’s. Provide maintenance access to all ponding facilities. 35. The development will need to meet the appropriate watershed standards for Elm Creek Water Management Commission and the applicant shall submit for the required permits. Wetlands & Environmental 36. The concept plan shows several wetlands located on the site. Aquatic resources were delineated using a routine Level 2 delineation method and have been approved. 37. Approximately 3.0 acres of wetland impact is anticipated. Any permanent or temporary impacts proposed must be permitted via the Wetland Conservation Act as well as US Army Corps of Engineers. 38. Upland buffers and buffer setbacks will be required for the project. The table below outlines the management classification as determined by the City’s Functional Classification of Wetlands map. Wetlands without a management classification will require a MnRAM to determine appropriate buffer widths. City of Medina – Cates Industrial Park Development Comp Plan Amendment – Engineering Review January 4, 2022 Page 5 K:\019596-000\Admin\Docs\2022-01-04 Comp Plan Amendment Review\_2022-01-04 Cates Ranch Comp Plan Amendment - WSB Engineering Comments.docx Wetland ID Functional Classification Required Buffer Average (ft)/Minimum (ft) Wetland 1 Manage 3 20/15 Wetland 2 TBD TBD Wetland 3 Manage 3 20/15 Wetland 4 Manage 2 25/20 Wetland 5 TBD TBD Wetland 6 TBD TBD Wetland 7 TBD TBD Wetland 8 TBD TBD Wetland 9 Manage 1 30/20 Wetland 10 Preserve 35/25 Wetland 11 Manage 3 20/15 Wetland 12 TBD TBD 39. Any necessary tree clearing will be completed between November 1 and March 31. 40. Fugitive dust generated during construction must be controlled by sweeping, watering, or sprinkling, as appropriate or as prevailing weather and soil conditions dictate. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards. With future submittals, include a response to the comments in this letter. We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet. Sincerely, WSB Jim Stremel, P.E. City Engineer CITY OF CORCORAN A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered unow.corcorannmgoa January 27, 2022 Dusty Finke City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Cates Ranch Industrial Mr. Finke, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment in reference to the property known as "Cates Ranch Industrial", located on Willow Drive, North of Highway 55. It is our understanding that this request will re -guide approximately 70 acres of land currently identified as "Future Development Area" to "Business" within the 2040 Comprehensive Plan for Medina. This change in land use guiding will allow for an Industrial Park Zoning designation, and three industrial buildings for warehouse or light manufacturing are anticipated as a result. The City of Corcoran has reviewed the materials received by the City on December 16, 2021, and offers the following comments: 1. When the City of Medina's draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan was made available for review in 2017, the City of Corcoran submitted a letter (dated June 22, 2017) that did not provide specific feedback on the parcels guided as "Future Development Area" other than a recommendation that the City of Medina consider modifying this area to allow development within the 20 -year planning period to support regional sanitary sewer improvement. Additionally, the City of Corcoran noted that the areas between Willow Drive and Rolling Hills Road, to the east of Cates Ranch Industrial, were guided for Business and Rural Commercial which was inconsistent with the Existing Residential and Low -Density Residential designations immediately adjacent to the north in Corcoran. At that time, we asked for the City of Medina to consider requiring buffering between proposed industrial uses and the existing residential uses in Corcoran. This same scenario applies to the two parcels in the request, and we again ask the City of Medina to require buffering and screening to mitigate impacts from light and noise from industrial uses developed on Cates Ranch Industrial should the comprehensive plan amendment move forward. Continued on the following page... Administrative Offices 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: 763-420-2288 Police Department Offices 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: 763-420-8966 Public Works Offices 9100 County Road 19 Corcoran, MN 55357 Phone: 763-420-2652 CITY OF CORCORAN A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered www.corcoraman.goa 2. Also, in the letter to the City of Medina dated June 22, 2017, the City of Corcoran asked the City of Medina to consider extending the planned trail for a portion of Willow Drive to the north boundary to align with the City of Corcoran's own plan for a trail along Willow Drive. Since this time, the City of Corcoran has further contemplated an improvement project along Willow Drive that includes bituminous trail to the Medina border along the west side of the roadway. We recommend you require construction of the trail within Medina, or at a minimum preserve right-of-way to allow for a future trail connection. 3. Floodplain elevations indicate that a portion of the site has floodplain within the site, and the floodplain extends north into Corcoran. We request that the applicant be required to study this floodplain to define the Base Flood Elevation around this area and ensure the development does not impact adjacent parcels. 4. Willow Drive to the north of Medina is a gravel road which is not able to support significant traffic from a proposed industrial development. We ask that all reasonable measures be implemented to ensure development traffic goes south to Highway 55. 5. Our two cities have an interconnection of water systems at Wild Meadows and Ravinia along Hackamore Road for use during maintenance or emergencies. Although Corcoran is rural, we recommend a watermain stub be considered to the Corcoran boundary to serve as a future interconnect. Please feel free to contact Interim City Administrator, Jessica Beise, with questions at jbeise corcoranmn.gov or 763-400-7029. Sincerely, Tom McKee //Jessica Beise Mayor / Interim City Administrator City of Corcoran City of Corcoran Copy: Kendra Lindahl, City Planner Natalie Davis McKeown, Planner City File Administrative Offices 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: 763-420-2288 Police Department Offices 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: 763-420-8966 Public Works Offices 9100 County Road 19 Corcoran, MN 55357 Phone: 763-420-2652 Metropolitan District Waters Edge Building 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 An equal opportunity employer MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 February 2, 2022 Dusty Finke Planning Director City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 SUBJECT: MnDOT Review #CPA21-009 Cates Industrial Park CPA NE Quad MN 55 & Willow Drive Medina, Hennepin County Dear Mr. Finke: Thank you for the opportunity to review the plans for the Cates Industrial Park CPA. MnDOT has reviewed the documents and has the following comments: Traffic: A pan, tilt, zoom (PTZ) camera should be added to the signal system at MN 55 and Willow Dr as mitigation for the proposed development traffic, as it will enable MnDOT Signal Operations to monitor and adjust operations as needed. Fiber optic cable will be needed to connect the camera to the existing fiber network. Minor signal timing adjustments (ie lengthen cycle) may be considered. The connection of Chippewa Road to Arrowhead Dr is important to provide alternate routes onto MN 55. Questions regarding these comments should be directed to Eric Lauer-Hunt, MnDOT Metro District Traffic at eric.lauer-hunt@state.mn.us or 651-234-7875. Permits: Any use of, or work within or affecting, MnDOT right of way will require a permit. Permits can be applied for at this site: https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. Please upload a copy of this letter when applying for any permits. Please direct questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig of MnDOT’s Metro Permits Section at 651-775-0405 or Buck.Craig@state.mn.us. Review Submittal Options MnDOT’s goal is to complete reviews within 30 calendar days. Review materials received electronically can be processed more rapidly. Do not submit files via a cloud service or SharePoint link. In order of preference, review materials may be submitted as: MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 1. Email documents and plans in PDF format to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us. Attachments may not exceed 20 megabytes per email. Documents can be zipped as well. If multiple emails are necessary, number each message. 2. PDF file(s) uploaded to MnDOT’s external shared internet workspace site at: https://mft.dot.state.mn.usmetrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us. Contact MnDOT Planning development review staff at for uploading instructions, and send an email listing the file name(s) after the document(s) has/have been uploaded. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 234-7797. Sincerely, Cameron Muhic Senior Planner Copy sent via E-Mail: Buck Craig, Permits Lance Schowalter, Design Jason Swenson, Water Resources Eric Lauer-Hunt, Traffic Andrew Lutaya, Area Engineer Doug Nelson, Right-of-Way Michael Samuelson, Multimodal Jesse Thornsen, Multimodal Jason Junge, Transit Russell Owen, Metropolitan Council elm creek Watershed Management Commi ssion ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 3235 Fernbrook Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 PH: 763.553.1144 E-mail: judie@jass.biz CHAMPLIN • CORCORAN • DAYTON • MAPLE GROVE • M EDINA • PLYMOUTH • ROGERS December 21, 2021 City of Medina Mr. Dusty Finke, Planning Directory 2052 County Road 24 Medina, Minnesota 55340 Re: Medina Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Cates Industrial Park Dear Mr. Finke On behalf of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC), I would like to offer the comments below on the Medina Comprehensive Plan Amendment- Cates Industrial Park based on the Watershed’s purpose as defined in Minnesota Statutes 103B.210 and its goals identified in the 2015 Third Generation Plan: • Future development on the project site shall conform to ECWMC rules and standards. A complete list of the Elm Creek WMC rules and standards can be viewed at Application Requirements - Elm Creek Watershed. Site development must meet these stormwater, wetlands, buffers, floodplains, and erosion control standards. o Please be advised that the property immediately to the north, in Corcoran, includes Hennepin County Ditch #3 and a designated FEMA floodplain. This mapped FEMA floodplain is inconsistent with topography and future remapping efforts are likely to extend the FEMA mapping onto the proposed Cates Industrial Park site. o The cumulative effect of increased runoff volume is an emerging issue in the ECWMC due to rapid development and the construction of impervious issues on the landscape. Increased runoff volume is associated with increased flood risk for downstream communities and degradation of channel banks due to increased non-peak flows, aquatic species disturbance due to hydrologic regime changes, and the warming of stormwater runoff. Site soils show Hydrologic Soil Groups C and D, low and very low infiltration potential (high runoff potential). To the extent reasonable, the site design should limit increased annual runoff volume by using best management practices. Please contact me if you have any questions on this information. Sincerely Ross Mullen, Technical Advisor to the Commission Cc Jim Kujawa, ECWMC; Judie Anderson, ECWMC CITY OF MEDINA APPLICATION FOR PLANNING CONSIDERATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. on behalf of the Cates Family is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment in reference to the property referred to as CATES RANCH INDUSTRIAL, located on Willow Drive, north of Highway 55, in the City of Medina, Hennepin County Minnesota (see Exhibit A – Location Map). Project Background The Cates Family is proposing to develop two parcels (Parcel IDs 00411823110002 and 0411823140004) for three industrial buildings. The buildings are intended to be used for warehouse or light manufacturing, compatible with an “Industrial Park (IP)” Zoning. Development of this property will require an Amendment to the Medina 2040 Comprehensive Plan to change the Future Land Use Map classification of this property from “Future Development Area (FDA)” to “Business (B)”. This amendment to the Future Land Use will allow for a rezoning of the property, which is currently in the “Rural Residential-Urban Reserve (RR-UR)” zoning district. The property is governed by an existing Stipulation of Agreement dated November 8, 2000, between the Cates family and City of Medina, under which the City received fee title to certain portions of the Cates property for reconstruction/realignment of Chippewa Road and Willow Drive, respectively. In exchange for these conveyances, the City contractually obligated itself to amend the land use designation of the remaining Cates property to allow for commercial use, subject to the City’s normal zoning policies. The City is legally obligated to approve this land use designation. The subject property is 67.12 acres and consists of agricultural and rural residential land uses. The proposed development will include three industrial/warehouse buildings equaling a total area of approximately 664,830 sq. ft. (see Exhibit B – Conceptual Site Plan). The front side of the buildings will face the roads or property lines and there will be two rows of associate vehicle parking (795 parking spaces proposed). The truck courts and loading docks will be placed rear of the buildings in the center of the property and screened from public right-of-way view. Proposed trailer parking is 219 spaces. The concept site design also includes preserved wetlands, stormwater treatment ponds and open space/buffer areas. Access to the site is from Willow Drive to the West with a center drive. Existing, surrounding property zoning includes “Urban Reserve” zoned property to North (City of Corcoran), “Rural Business Holdings (RBH)” and “Business (B)” to the West, “Commercial Highway (CH)” to the South, and Rural Residential-Urban Reserve (RR-UR)” to the East. Summary of Request Existing and Proposed Zoning and Future Land Use Maps are included as Exhibits C-F. Table 1: Summary of Requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning Existing FLU Classification Future Development Area (FDA) Proposed FLU Classification Business (B) Existing Zoning Classification Rural Residential-Urban Reserve (RR-UR) Proposed Zoning Classification Business (B) Currently the property is designated as “Future Development Area (FDA)”. From Chapter 5 – Land Use & Growth of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan: Future Development Area (FDA) identifies areas which could potentially be planned for future urban development in the City that will be provided municipal sewer and water services. This area will remain rural unless and until designated for urban services in a future Comprehensive Plan update. The purpose of the FDA designation is to communicate the future planning intentions to the community. This designation is tentative and depends greatly on future infrastructure improvements, including to regional highway capacity. The proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map would designate the subject property as “Business (B)”. From Chapter 5 – Land Use & Growth of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan: Business (B) provides opportunities for corporate campus uses including office, warehouse, and light industrial. This designation identifies larger tracts of land that are suitable for office and business park developments and are served or will be served by urban services. Previous Studies and Anticipated Improvements Before the Comprehensive plan amendment, the developer conducted an Environmental Assessment Worksheet, (EAW) for the project to identify any environmental, traffic, infrastructure, or community issues with eh project. Several agencies were given the opportunity to review this document and provide comments to the City and Developer. During the review process, there were very few comments, which were all very minor in nature, including comments from the adjoining community from the north that did not oppose the development. Through out the EAW process and initial discussions with City staff, traffic in the area has been a concern. Trunk Hwy 55 is a two-lane road as it intersects with Willow Drive, and even thought this intersection has a traffic signal is know not to function very well for south bound traffic off of Willow Drive. Several options were proposed to improve this intersection, but MNDOT will only allow a camera with some minor signal timing adjustments as they see fit. In order to keep the intersection of Willow Drive and Hwy 55 functioning as it does today, the existing south bound left turn lane on Willow drive will be extended to the intersection with Chippewa. Additionally, a south bound left turn lane will be constructed at the intersection of Willow and Chippewa to accommodate traffic wanting to east bound on Chippewa. This will allow traffic to gain access to Hwy 55 at Arrowood Drive as well. Based on the traffic models the Arrowwood drive and Hwy 55 intersection can accept the additional traffic along with the Willow Drive and Hwy 55 intersection. The improvements to Willow drive will be installed by the DEVELOPER with the proposed development at NO cost to the City of Medina. The improvements to Willow drive will benefit not only the development, but the existing businesses and future developments to the west as well. Consistency with Future Land Use Plan The request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment is consistent with “Chapter 5 – Land Use of Growth” of the Medina 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the proposed project achieves several of the Future Land Use Plan Principles, outlined below within each of the four Plan Principles. The proposed development is also consistent with “Business Uses” objectives as described in Chapter 5 of the Comprehensive Plan. · FLU Plan Principle: Encourage open spaces, parks, and trails in all neighborhood developments. Surveys indicate that a high quality of life is found when residents have visual access to green spaces · FLU Plan Principle: Preserve open spaces and natural resources. · Business Uses Objective #1: Require preservation of natural slopes, wetlands, woodlands, and other significant natural characteristics of the property. The proposed development, as shown on the Conceptual Site Plan, was designed to preserve as many of the on-site, and connecting off-site, wetland areas as possible. Wetland preservation and stormwater treatment areas are proposed where there are existing wetlands in the northwest and south portions of the property. Where the north/northwest wetlands system is more complex. Historically, this property was used for agriculture and all the wetlands were impacted by runoff from this use. The proposed stormwater treatment in this area should provide improvements to stormwater quality in this system. On the east side of the property, the wetlands are better quality, and these are being preserved in their more natural state. Additionally, the 100’ setback on the east side of the property will remain as open space, serving the dual purposes of providing a buffer between the buildings and the adjacent residential properties as well as preserving existing wetlands. · FLU Plan Principle: Maintain the integrity of rural neighborhoods and promote development patterns consistent with existing rural residential development. · Business Uses Objective #4: Regulate the impact of development along the border between business and residentially guided areas to ensure that business uses have a minimal impact on residential areas. · Business Uses Objective #12: Regulate noise, illumination, and odors as needed to maintain public health and safety. The proposed site design shown in the Concept Site Plan was developed with the surrounding rural neighborhood in mind. The orientation of the three, smaller warehouse buildings allows the loading docks for each of the building to face inward on the site. This will contain the noise and activity of these docking areas use to the center of the property. The less impactful features such as vehicle parking lots and open space (including some berms on the east side) are located at the periphery of the site. · FLU Plan Principle: Recognize neighborhood characteristics and promote new development compatible in scale, architectural quality, and style with existing neighborhoods. · Business Uses Objective #6: Encourage construction that enhances the visual appeal of TH 55 corridor and the rural vistas and open spaces of the City. The proposed, smaller-scale warehouse buildings are consistent with light industrial businesses that currently exist along the Highway 55 corridor, both east and west of the subject property. The “2016 Existing Land Uses” Map 5-2 of the Comprehensive Plan show “Industrial and Utility” land uses directly west and south of the subject site. Additionally, three smaller warehouse buildings, two of which are located directly behind the building that faces Highway 55, is more visually appealing than one large, mega-warehouse. · FLU Plan Principle: Guide density to areas with proximity to existing infrastructure and future infrastructure availability. Existing utilities that serve the subject property support the proposed industrial development. Adequate water and electricity serve the site from Willow Drive. There is also adequate sewer service to the site and a future lift station is planned along Willow Drive for depth and future service. Stormwater runoff that currently drains into an existing public drainage ditch on the site will instead be diverted to a proposed stormwater treatment area. Access to the site will be from Willow Drive, Cates Ranch Road and Chippewa Road. Which all will use Willow Drive to access Highway 55. Truck and care entrances will be separated on each of the building sites to prevent a mixture of different traffic types on each property. · FLU Plan Principle: Recognize regional highway capacity and planned improvements, along with use forecasts, as major factors in planning for growth and land use changes · Business Uses Objective #9: Use the site plan review process to ensure that commercial and industrial uses are compatible with neighboring future and existing uses, and with the adjoining public streets and highways. · Per the ALTA Survey, by EFN dated September 30, 2021, the subject property has direct access to Willow Drive, a public right of way. We acknowledge that there may be traffic flow concerns due to Highway 55 converging from four lanes to two lanes just east of the subject property. To minimize the impact to traffic on this corridor, the site is intended for use by a few smaller semi- truck trailers than a single, large warehouse would typically require. Three smaller warehouses will also generate far fewer truck trips each day than one larger warehouse would generate. A traffic impact study is being conducted by Kimley-Horn will be discussed upon completion. FLU Plan Principle: Work to create job opportunities in the community for Medina residents to reduce traffic and commuting demands. · Business Uses Objective #2: Encourage businesses that benefit the local community by providing employment opportunities utilizing high quality design and having limited impact on public services. The uses anticipated for these three buildings include warehouse, light industrial, and trades. It is possible the buildings could be utilized as flex space, although the primary use is anticipated to be warehouse uses. This flexibility of uses allows for a range of employment opportunities to suit individual business and employer needs, Full employment numbers will be determined with each specific user when the project is built out · FLU Plan Principle: Support business development with a corporate campus style which provides open spaces and protects natural resources. · Business Uses Objective # 7: Create or update standards that promote a more rural appearance or create campus style developments that protect ecologically significant areas and natural features. The proposed site layout is consistent with the City’s desire for buildings in proximity with centralized activity. This configuration does allow for significant open space preservation and continued functionality of natural wetland systems on- and off-site. 4855-1677-4151, v. 1 February 22, 2022 Mayor Kathleen Martin Medina City Councilmembers City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, Minnesota 55340 BY EMAIL ONLY kathleen.martin@medinamn.gov dino.deslauriers@medinamn.gov todd.albers@medinamn.gov robin.reid@medinamn.gov joseph.cavanaugh@medinamn.gov Re: Cates Family Application for Land Use Amendment Dear Mayor Martin and Councilmembers: We represent the Jeff Cates family and its chosen developer, Oppidan, with regard to the pending application to amend the City of Medina’s 2040 Land Use Map to designate the Cates property as “Business” in place of the current “Future Development Area” designation. The request also seeks to redesignate the Cates property for immediate development under the City’s development staging plan. If approved by the City, we would initiate a separate application to rezone the Cates property to a compatible “business park” zoning to accommodate phased development of light industrial, warehousing and office/flex uses. The Cates property encompasses approximately 67 acres just north of TH 55 and directly adjacent to Willow Drive. The property is separated into two parcels (30.18 acres and 36.92, respectively) based on the alignment of Cates Ranch Drive. The Cates property is situated in an emerging commercial/industrial area of the City, with established businesses located directly west and southwest. There are three (3) larger rural residential parcels located directly east of the Cates property. These landowners have received notice of both the EAW petition and the pending application for Land Use Amendment. Public utilities are immediately available to the Cates property as is access via Willow, Cates Ranch and Chippewa Road. As part of the related Environmental Assessment Worksheet process, we solicited feedback from the Minnesota Department of Transportation regarding any potential modifications to TH 55 needed to accommodate the proposed business park use. Staff can confirm that MnDOT’s comments were minor and can be addressed through the City’s Site Plan process. In November 2000, the City and the Cates family entered into a settlement agreement whereby the Cates family conveyed a portion of its property to the City for reconstruction/realignment of Chippewa Road and Willow Drive, respectively. In exchange for this conveyance, the City obligated itself to designate the southern half of the Cates property for business use, subject to Mayor Kathleen Martin Medina City Councilmembers February 22, 2022 Page 2 the City’s development policies. Whereas initially the City reguided the entirety of the Cates property Urban Commercial, the current Comprehensive Plan guides it Future Development Area. In our opinion, the City is legally obligated, at a minimum, to adhere to the terms of the agreement given that it has received the full benefit of the land conveyance that was central to it. City Comprehensive Plan Policies The City’s most recent 2040 Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2018; the world as we know it has shifted dramatically in that relatively short span of time. Most notably, the manner in which business is conducted globally has been driven by telecommuting, online communications and just-in-time delivery of goods and services. The Twin Cities region has been forced to adapt to this reality as more people become accustomed to working, shopping, dining and being entertained from home. Businesses are adapting by placing their operations as close to the “consumer” as possible, to maximize timely delivery and minimize long-distance obligations. The Cates family is proposing to support this shift in the business economy by pursuing development of a low-intensity business park campus to support light industrial, warehouse and office/flex uses. These are anticipated to be clean, low-impact businesses, attracting head-of- household wage-earners to the City to work and, hopefully, raise their families. The following information in the current 2040 Plan supports this objective: As of 2016, the City has only 1.6% of its land area committed to industrial or utility uses, with the corresponding commercial property tax base. The Cates development plan would add approximately 67 acres of commercial tax base to the City. The City Plan calls out TH 55 as the primary service corridor for light industrial, warehouse and manufacturing uses. The Cates family has confirmed that its development plan can be implemented with reasonable improvements to highway infrastructure. The City Plan calls for the protection of neighborhoods. The Cates family is pursuing a phased plan that places its business park adjacent to an established commercial area of the City, served directly from TH 55 and Willow Drive. There will be no interference with existing or planned residential neighborhoods. The City Plan guides new development to existing public infrastructure. The Cates property has ready access to public sewer and water services. The City Plan calls for the protection of natural resources. The Cates property will be developed in accordance with state and local regulations to ensure protection of wetlands on the site and the installation of landscape screening. Finally, the City Plan guides business development to primary transportation corridors where public utilities are available. This includes supporting business campus development patterns that create job opportunities for Medina residents. While the exact nature of the business users attracted to the Cates property is not yet known, we envision an attractive, architecturally designed business park of up to three (3) buildings in an area of the City already developed for Mayor Kathleen Martin Medina City Councilmembers February 22, 2022 Page 3 commercial uses, situated with ready access to TH 55 and public utilities. See attached concept elevations. We appreciate the City Council’s consideration of the land use amendment request put forward by the Cates family. We look forward to working with you and City staff to develop the Cates property into a successful, attractive business park, that attracts new employment opportunities for Medina residents and enhances the City’s commercial property tax base. important matter. Sincerely, Peter J. Coyle, for Larkin Hoffman Direct Dial: (952) 896-3214 Direct Fax: (952) 841-1704 Email: pcoyle@larkinhoffman.com Attachment cc: Jeff Cates Family 4871-6935-2464, v. 1 December 17, 2021 Dusty Finke Planning Director City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 BY EMAIL Re: Cates Property Land Use Application Dear Dusty: I am writing on behalf of the Cates family, as the applicant for a land use amendment governing its property situated north of TH55 in Medina, Minnesota. We appreciate having the opportunity to talk directly with Scott Johnson and you yesterday regarding the requested Business land use amendment to the City’s Future Land Use map. We understand that the land use application will be taken up separately by the City after the pending Environmental Assessment Worksheet (“EAW”) for the Cates property has been cleared by the City Council for submittal to the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board. During the December 7th City Council meeting, as part of its consideration of the EAW, there was discussion amongst Councilmembers whether reguiding the Cates property was appropriate or desirable at this time. Notably, the City Councilmembers did not seem to be aware of the long-standing contractual obligation of the City to reguide the Cates property for general commercial use. See Stipulation of Settlement, Nov. 8, 2020, between Wallace and Erica Cates and the City of Medina (copy attached). The Settlement was the result of the City’s condemnation of certain Cates property to allow for the realignment/reconstruction of Chippewa Road and Willow Drive. In exchange for Cates agreeing to the City’s take of its property for this purpose, the City bound itself to reguide the residual Cates property adjacent thereto to allow for a commercial use as legally described in the referenced Exhibit B attached thereto. We understand the City has fully completed the reconstruction relating to Chippewa and Willow and retains the full ownership, use and benefit of the property acquired from Cates for that purpose. Unfortunately, the City has not fulfilled its obligation to the Cates family and has, in fact, rendered its remaining property undevelopable at this time based on its most recent 2040 Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map. The pending application to reguide the Cates property to Business will allow for a planned commercial use, consistent with City planning and zoning policies, as detailed in the submitted application and narrative from Kimley Horn. Dusty Finke December 17, 2021 Page 2 The pending application will fulfill the contractual bargain struck by the City with Cates. The City’s obligation under the Settlement is not discretionary; by its terms, it is perpetually binding on both parties, including heirs, representatives, successors and assigns. We look forward to pursuing the pending land use application relating to the Cates property. We appreciate the courtesy of City staff in reviewing this matter with us and look forward to working cooperatively on this matter in the weeks ahead. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Peter J. Coyle, for Larkin Hoffman Direct Dial: (952) 896-3214 Direct Fax: (952) 841-1704 Email: pcoyle@larkinhoffman.com Attachment cc: Jeff Cates Family Ron Batty, Esq. 4893-7238-7591, v. 1 a STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Case Type: Condemnation DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT City of Medina, Court File No. CD -2574 Petitioner, VS. Wallace H. Cates and Erica C. Cates; City of Medina; County of Hennepin; all other parties unknown having any right, title, or interest in the premises herein together with unknown heirs or devisees, if any of the parties that may be deceased and including unknown spouses, if any, Respondents. STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this P4,••• day of Arv-Q.J4'L. , 2000, by and between the CITY OF MEDINA, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, located at 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN 55340, Petitioner herein, ("CITY") and WALLACE H. CATES and ERICA C. CATES, 2490 Cates Ranch Road, Medina, MN 55340, Respondents herein ("CATES"). L RECITALS 1.01. CATES represent that prior to the transfer of title and possession herein they were the owners in fee simple of the real estate located near the Northeast corner of Trunk Highway No. 55 and Willow Drive in the City of Medina, MN 55340, which is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Subject Property"). RJL-182628v7 M E230-301 1.02. CITY has commenced the above -captioned proceeding to acquire the Subject Property pursuant to the above captioned proceeding for the realignment of Chippewa Road (aka Chippawa Road). 1.03. CATES have requested that the Subject Property and certain additional real estate owned by them should be reguided by the CITY in the C1TY's comprehensive plan to provide for the future use of said real estate to be urban commercial (all of which real estate is legally described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein and is referred to as "To Be Reguided Real Estate"). 1.04. CITY has claimed that Oudot B described on Exhibit A should properly have been dedicated by CATES to the CITY in the plat of CATES RANCH for road purposes. 1.05. CITY has advised CATES that CITY also desires to acquire a portion of Lot 1, Block 3, Cates Ranch (which is legally described on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein and is referred to herein as "Realigned Willow Drive") from CATES for the realignment of Willow Drive, currently abutting the west boundary of said Lot 1, Block 3, Cates Ranch. 1.06. CATES have advised CITY that CATES desire that the location of Outlot B (and hence the realignment of Chippewa Road) be modified so as to instead encumber the real estate which is legally described in Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein ("New Realigned Chippewa Road"); 1.07. In this Agreement, the CITY and CATES desire: (a) to settle and compromise CATES' claim for damages due to the Taking in the above captioned proceeding; (b) to provide for the reguiding of the To Be Reguided Real Estate; (c) to provide for the conveyance to CITY of Realigned Willow Drive; (d) to provide for the realignment and dedication of Chippewa Road to instead encumber New Realigned Chippewa Road; (e) to provide for the granting of RJL-182628v7 ME230-301 2 temporary easements for construction of New Realigned Chippewa Road; and (f) to provide for the assignment to CITY of the Quick Take Deposit and interest accrued thereon in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. 1.08. CATES admit that they have been properly served and that the above Court has jurisdiction over them and the Subject Property in this proceeding. 1.09. The above court has approved the public purpose and necessity of the Taking and has approved transfer of title and possession of the Subject Property to the CITY and title and the right of possession of the Subject Property did pass to the CITY as of April 4, 2000, upon deposit of the City's approved appraisal of value for the Subject Property ($25,500) ("Quick Take Deposit"). II. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, their mutual promises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 2.01. Incorporation of Recitals. The foregoing recitals are made a part of this agreement. 2.02. Performance by City. CITY and CATES agree that CITY shall complete the following in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement as the total consideration for the Subject Property ("Purchase Price"): (a) Reguide the To Be Reguided Real Estate in the CITY's comprehensive plan to urban commercial (subject to Metropolitan Council approval); (b) Reconvey to CATES by quit claim deed that part of the Subject Property which is not within New Realigned Chippewa Road; RJL-182628v7 ME230-301 3 (c) Prepare for review and execution by CATES a plat which CITY staff finds to be in acceptable form, and submit the plat to City Council for approval, the effect of which will be to replat New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive, and upon approval and execution, cause the same to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County; and (d) Waive the C1TY's standard application fee and right to be reimbursed for consulting fees incurred by the CITY in review and processing of the plat described herein. (c) Excavate a pond to the north side of New Realigned Chippewa Road on Lot 1, Block 2, Cates Ranch Addition and connect the new pond and the existing pond by an appropriate culvert to be designed by the parties in the field. The materials excavated from the pond may be used by the City in construction of New Realigned Chippewa Road or Realigned Willow Drive. The pond may be used by CATES in the future as a NURP pond in conjunction with future development of that property. CITY shall.complete (a) through (d) on or before November 22, 2000, or such earlier date as the parties may agree upon, the Date of Closing herein. CITY shall complete (e) as part of its construction of New Realigned Chippewa Road. Within 30 days following construction of New Realigned Chippewa Road, City will, at its cost, install a fence separating New Realigned Chippewa Road from adjacent property owned by CATES. 2.03. Performance by CATES. CATES and CITY agree that CATES shall, prior CO the Date of Closing, when presented to them for signature, sign before a notary public: (a) A plat prepared by the CITY ('Plat") which provides for the following: RJL-182628v7 ME230-301 4 (i) Dedication of New Realigned Chippewa Road to the public forever, without cost to the CITY, for street, utility and other public purposes; and (ii) Dedication of Realigned Willow Drive to the public forever, without cost to the CITY, for street, utility and other public purposes. (b) Temporary Easements for a term of 24 months from the date of Closing (in the case of New Realigned Chippewa Road) and 48 months from the date of Closing (in the case of Realigned Willow Drive), but otherwise substantially in the form described in Exhibit A, encumbering the westerly, northerly and easterly 20 feet of Lot 1, Block 2, Cates Ranch Second Addition, and the southerly 20 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Cates Ranch Second Addition. 2.04. Settlement of Litigation. (a) The parties agree that this Agreement has been entered into in settlement of the above -captioned eminent domain proceeding. The Purchase Price includes additional considerations which do not represent the value of the real estate. The Subject Property is being purchased to enable CITY to proceed with its realignment of Chippewa Road and Willow Drive. This Agreement shall be admissible as a basis for issuance of a Commissioners' Award in the above -captioned matter or in district court to obtain enforcement of the Agreement, but shall not be introduced in eminent domain proceedings related to other properties for the purpose of determining the value of those other properties. (b) The parties agree that if Closing has not been held pursuant to this Agreement by December 31, 2000, this Agreement may be rescinded by either CATES or CITY by written notice to the other party, in which case the issue of damages caused by the Taking shall be submitted to the Court Appointed Commissioners in the above captioned eminent domain proceeding. RJL•I82628v7 ME230.301 5 2.05. Transfer of Title. (a) CATES agree that, at Closing, CATES shall (i) demonstrate to the satisfaction of counsel for the CITY that CATES has marketable title, free and clear of all encumbrances, except the permitted encumbrances listed in § 2.10 ("Permitted Encumbrances"), (ii) assign the Quick Take Deposit and all interest accrued thereon to CITY; (iii) execute and deliver a customary affidavit that there are no unsatisfied judgments of record, no actions pending in any state or federal courts, no tax liens, and no bankruptcy proceedings filed against or by CATES, and no labor or materials have been furnished to new Realigned Chippewa Road or Realigned Willow Drive for which payment has not been made, and that to the best of CATES' knowledge there are no unrecorded interests relating to New Realigned Chippewa Road or Realigned Willow Drive; (iv) execute and deliver a well certificate (if required); (v) execute and deliver such other documents as may be required to convey marketable title of New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive to CITY, and comply with applicable laws and regulations; and (vi) pay the state deed tax and recording fees and charges relating to the filing of any deeds or other documents recorded due to the conveyance to CATES of the portions of the Subject Property which are not included within New Realigned Chippewa Road. (b) In addition to performing as provided in § 2.02, CITY shall at Closing: 1) Pay all recording fees and charges relating to the filing of the Plat, quit claim deed and all other documents recorded therewith (except as provided in (a) of this Section 2.05); 2) Pay any Title Insurance premiums incurred by CITY; 3) Pay any closing fee charged by an escrow or closing agent with respect to CITY's purchase of New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive; RJL-i82628v'. h1E230.301 6 (c) In addition to performing as provided in § 2.03, CATES shall at Closing: (1) satisfy all encumbrances against New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive which are not Permitted Encumbrances; (2) pay all recording fees for documents necessary to satisfy of record encumbrances against New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive which are not Permitted Encumbrances; and (3) pay all real estate taxes, unpaid special assessments, utility bills, garbage bills and other expenses attributable to CATES's occupancy or ownership of New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive. (d) The assignment by CATES of the Quick Take Deposit and accrued interest which is described in Section 2.05(a)(ii) shall be effective upon filing of the plat. 2.06. Waiver of Other Claims. In consideration for the performance by CITY as provided in this Agreement, CATES waive any and all claims they may have against CITY in connection with CITY's acquisition of New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive, including but not limited to damages, interest, attorneys fees, appraisal fees, relocation benefits, costs and disbursements to which CATES may otherwise be entitled or claim to be entitled. 2.07. Waiver of Further Proceedings. CITY and CATES both waive the right to all further hearings, proceedings and appeals in connection with the CITY's acquisition of New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive except as either may elect in order to enforce or carry out the provisions of this Agreement. 2.08. Notices. All notices and demands required hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given either when personally delivered or when deposited in the United States mail, as certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, by facsimile transmission, or by first-class mail as evidenced by an Affidavit of Service, addressed as follows: I21L-182628v7 ME230-301 7 If to CATES: With a copy to: Wallace H. Cates and Erica C. Cates 2490 Cates Ranch Road Medina, MN 55340 Allen D. Barnard, Esq Best & Flanagan, LLP 4000 US Bank Place Minneapolis, MN 55402-4331 If to CITY: City of Medina City Hall ATTN: Paul Robinson Clerk -Treasurer 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 With a copy to: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Attention: Robert J. Lindall Facsimile No.: (612) 337-9310 2.09. Miscellaneous Provisions. (a) Breach. In the event either party breaches or defaults in its performance hereunder, the other party shall have the right to pursue all its remedies under this Agreement, in the eminent domain proceeding, in equity, at law, or any or all of the foregoing, to seek enforcement of this Agreement, including, without limitation, the right to damages (including reasonable attorneys fees), a decree for specific performance or an order to compel performance in the above captioned matter. If CATES fail to provide CITY marketable title as contemplated by this Agreement, at its option, CITY may proceed to acquire New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive pursuant to the above - captioned eminent domain proceedings. (b) Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the transaction and it supersedes all prior RJL-182628+n ME230-301 8 understandings or agreements between the parties. No representations, warranties, inducements or oral agreements have been made by any of the parties, except as expressly set forth herein, or in other contemporaneous written agreements. (c) Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. (d) Survival of Warranties. All the covenants, agreements, representations, and warranties made by the parties in .this agreement or in any document or instrument delivered by the parties pursuant to this Agreement shall survive this agreement and the transfer of title of New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive to CITY. (e) Waiver, Modification. The failure by either party to enforce its rights hereunder shall not constitute a waiver of said party's right to demand future performance of the provisions hereof. No modification or extension of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by the parties. (f) Time of Essence. Timely performance is essential in this Agreement and each of its provisions. Where any date or time prescribed by this Agreement falls on a Saturday, Sunday or statutory holiday, such date or time shall automatically be extended to the next business day. (g) Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. (h) Further Documents. Each party hereto shall promptly, on the request of the other party, have acknowledged and delivered to the other party any and all further RJL-182628v7 N1E230.301 9 instruments and assurances reasonably requested or appropriate to evidence or give effect to the provisions of this Agreement. (i) No Commissions. Under no circumstances, including, without limitation, any default(s) of CATES and/or CITY under this Agreement, will any real estate broker or agent be entitled to any commission, or to any notice under this Agreement. (i) Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is declared void or unenforceable, such provision shall be deemed severed from this Agreement, which shall otherwise remain in full force and effect. 2.10. Permitted Encumbrances. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, CITY shall not be obliged to complete its performance herein until, by doing so, CITY will obtain marketable title and possession of New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive, free and clear of all encumbrances, except for: (a) Building and zoning laws, ordinances and State and Federal regulations. (b) Restrictions relating to use or improvement of New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow. Drive which are without effective forfeiture provisions. (c) Reservation of any minerals or mineral rights by the State of Minnesota. (d) Utility and drainage easements which do not interfere with existing improvements. 2.11. Leases; Other Interests. CITY has advised CATES of CITY's desire and intent to acquire New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive free and clear of the rights of tenants. CATES have represented to CITY that New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive is subject to no tenancies. R1L-182628v7 M E230.301 10 2.12. Real Estate Taxes and Special Assessments. (a) CATES shall pay all real estate taxes due and payable in the year 2000 with respect to New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive and all installments of special assessments which are payable therewith. (b) CITY shall pay all real estate taxes payable with respect to New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive in 2001 and each year thereafter. 2.13. Hazardous Substances. CATES represent that upon knowledge and information, since their purchase of New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive: (a) no hazardous substances have been spilled or released on New Realigned Chippewa Road or Realigned Willow Drive; and (b) there are no underground storage tanks on New Realigned Chippewa Road or Realigned Willow Drive. 2.14. Well. CATES represent that there are no wells located on New Realigned Chippewa Road or Realigned Willow Drive. 2.15. Contingencies. The obligations of CITY under this Agreement are expressly contingent upon approval of this Agreement by the CITY Council ("CITY's Contingencies"). If CITY's Contingencies have not been satisfied on or before the Closing Date, then CITY may, at C1TY's option, terminate this Agreement by giving notice to CATES on or before the Closing Date. The contingencies set forth in this Section 2.15 are for the sole and exclusive benefit of CITY, and crry shall have the right to waive the contingencies by giving notice to CATES. 2.16. Possession. On or before the Date of Closing, CATES shall deliver to CITY possession of New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive vacant and free of petroleum products, chemicals, and hazardous substances. Any personal property which remains on New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive after the Date of Closing shall be RJL-182628v7 ME230-301 11 deemed abandoned and may be disposed of by CITY as it sees fit. 2.17. Entry For Testing. CATES agree that CITY, its employees, agents and consultants may enter New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive for testing, inspections, surveys and monitoring at any time after the date of this Agreement, so long as: (a) Those entering New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive are insured; (b) CITY hereby agrees to hold CATES harmless from any liability, costs and disbursements relating to or arising out of the entry upon New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive except for liability arising out of conditions found to exist on New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive which are reasonably likely to have existed there at the time of rhis.Agreement; (c) CITY or its consultants give at least 48 hours' telephoned or written notice of their intent to enter New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive; and (d) The entry by CITY or its consultants upon New Realigned Chippewa Road and Realigned Willow Drive occurs between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, except holidays, unless otherwise agreed. 2.18. Use of Soil. CATES agrees that CITY may use clay from his property for construction of New Realigned Chippewa Road. CITY agrees that it will place black dirt or other appropriate cover over any such areas after CITY removes the clay. 2.19. Special Assessment. CITY agrees that it will reduce any special assessment which it would otherwise levy against CATES property as a result of the construction of New Realigned Chippewa Road by $30,000. RJL-182628v/ Ne1 F.230-301 12 crry OF Iv1ED1NA By: eteLP Wallace H. Cates By: rica C. Cates BEST & FLANAGAN, LLP Bv: Aen' atn d 4741y�� 4000 US Bank Place 601 Second Avenue So. Minneapolis, MN 55402-4331 (612) 339-7121 ATTORNEYS FOR WALLACE H. CATES AND ERICA C. CATES RJL-182623v7 ME230-301 13 By: And: Paul Robinson, Clerk -Treasurer erris, Mayor KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CH • ERED By: obert J. Lin • 11, .. y 77 Ronald H. Bat #5356 470 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9219 ATTORNEYS FOR THE CITY OF MEDINA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY O } SS.: On this d day of yisem? . 2000, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Paul Robinson and John Ferris to me personally known, who being by "me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Clerk -Treasurer and Mayor of the CITY OF MEDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on its behalf. otary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPN LAURA 1. SUlA 1DER NOTARY PUBLIC • MINNESOTA My Commbsim Expires Jon. 31.2005 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / day of /i ave4» 2000, by Wallace H. Cates and Erica C. Cates, husband altd wife. Notary Public • THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED (RJL) Attorneys at Law 470 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9219 RJL-182628v7 M E230-301 14 ALLEN D. BARNARD t4A, NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA 19;,--4.0.6:,;V My bCamm,ss+er p:?s .an ?t VAS '. ..�.: •AA.A.N.vAAAAAANWAAAAAA/VNAAANSANYVY Si EXHIBIT A Parcel 1: (PID No. 04-118-23-14-0003) (Abstract) Address of Property: Near Northeast corner of Trunk Highway No. 55 and Willow Drive, Medina, MN. Description of Property to be Acquired in Fee Simple Absolute: Outlot B, Cates Ranch, according to the plat thereof on file in the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Said Outlot B contains approximately 1.89 acres. Name Nature of Interest Wallace H. Cates and Erica C. Cates, husband and wife Fee owner . City of Medina Special Assessments County of Hennepin Real Estate Taxes All other parties unknown having any right, title, or interest in the real estate described herein, together with unknown heirs or devisees and spouses, if any, Possible holders of an interest RJL-I82628v7 h1 E230-301 A-1 Parcel 2: (PID No. 04-118-23-14-0001) (Abstract) or (Torrens) Address of Property: 2575 Cates Ranch Drive, Medina, MN 55340 Description of Property to be encumbered: Lot 1, Block 2, Cates Ranch, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record, Hennepin County, Minnesota.. Description of Taking: A temporary easement for construction purposes over and across the Southwest 20 feet of Lot 1, Block 2, Cates Ranch, adjacent to Outlot B, Cates Ranch. Said easement is also described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 2. Thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes 32 seconds East a distance of 117.00 feet; thence Southeasterly 500.84 feet along a curve deflecting to the right with a radius of 660.47 feet; thence South 46 degrees 26 minutes 41 seconds East a distance of 530.11 feet; thence Southeasterly 262.24 feet along a curve deflecting to the left with a radius of 357.62 feet; thence South 88 degrees 27 minutes 33 Seconds East a distance of 109.11 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 2; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 20 feet; thence North 88 degrees 27 minutes 33 seconds West a distance of 109.11 feet; thence Northwesterly 247.57 feet along a curve deflecting to the right with a radius of 337.62 feet; thence North 46 degrees 26 minutes 41 seconds West a distance of 530.11 feet; thence Northwesterly 516.01 feet along a curve deflecting to the left with a radius of 680.47 feet; thence North 89 degrees 53 minutes 32 seconds West a distance of 117.00 feet to the West line of Lot 1, Block 2; thence South 20 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 2 to the point of beginning and there terminating. Temporary easement area = 0.70 acres. Subject to easements of record in favor of the City of Medina. Said temporary easement shall begin on May 15, 2000 and expire on December 15, 2000. Name Nature of Interest Wallace H. Cates and Erica C. Cates, husband and wife Fee owner All other parties unknown having any right, title, or interest in the real estate described herein, together with unknown heirs or devisees and spouses, if any, Possible holders of an interest RJLe182628v7 M5230-301 A-2 Parcel 3: (PM No. 04-118-23-14-0002) (Abstract) or (Torrens) Address of Property: Description of Property to be Encumbered: Lot 1, Block 3, Cates Ranch, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Description of Taking: A temporary easement for construction purposes over and across the Northeast 20 feet of Lot 1, Block 3, Cates Addition, adjacent to Outlot B, Cates Addition. Said easement is also described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 3; thence 70.98 feet along a curve deflecting to the right with a radius of 423.62 feet; thence North 46 degrees 26 minutes 41 seconds West a distance of 530.11 feet; thence 450.79 feet along a curve deflecting to the left with a radius of 594.47 feet; thence North 89 degrees 53 minutes 32 seconds West a distance of 117.00 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 3; thence South 00 degrees 06 minutes 28 seconds West a distance of 20 feet; thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes 32 seconds East a distance of 117.00 feet; thence 435.62 feet Southeasterly along a curve deflecting to the right with a radius of 574.47 feet; thence South 46 degrees 26 minutes 41 seconds East a distance of 530.11 feet; thence continuing South 46 degrees 26 minutes 41 seconds East on the Tangent line to the South line of Lot 1, Block 3; thence South 88 degrees 27 minutes 33 seconds East to the point of beginning and there terminating. Temporary easement area = 0.53 acres. Subject to easements of record in favor of the City of Medina. Said temporary easement shall begin on May 15, 2000 and expire on December 15, 2000. Name Nature of Interest Wallace H. Cates and Erica C. Cates, husband and wife Fee owner . All other parties unknown having any right, title, or interest in the real estate described herein, together with unknown heirs or devisees and spouses, if any, Possible holders of an interest M-1826281:7 ME230-301 A-3 EXHIBIT B Legal description of To Be Reguided Real Estate: Lot 1, Block 2; Lot i , Block 3; Outlot B; Cates Ranch Addition According to the plat thereof on tile and of record in the Office of the County Recorder for Hennepin County, Minnesota RJL-182628v7 ME230-301 B-1 EXHIBIT C Legal Description of Realigned Willow Drive; Willow Drive, according to the plat of Cates Ranch Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota RJL-182628v7 ME230-301 C-1 EXHIBIT D Legal description of New Realigned Chippewa Road: Chippewa Road Cates Ranch Second Addition, according to the plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota RJL-182628v7 ME230-301 D-1 EXHIBIT D Emails {00561573 } W I L L O W D R I V E S T A T E H I G H W A Y N O . 5 5 C H I P P E W A R O A D W I L L O W D R I V E C A T E S R A N C H D R I V E 30' PROPOSED BUILDING ±205,000 SF STORM POND ±45,500 SF STORM POND ±97,290 SF PROPOSED BUILDING ±205,000 SF PROPOSED BUILDING ±256,000 SF 50 FT WETLAND BUFFER SETBACK 25 FT WETLAND BUFFER SETBACK (TYP) 25 FT WETLAND BUFFER SETBACK (TYP)25 FT WETLAND BUFFER SETBACK (TYP) 25 FT WETLAND BUFFER SETBACK (TYP) 25 FT WETLAND BUFFER SETBACK (TYP) 25 FT WETLAND BUFFER SETBACK (TYP) 25 FT WETLAND BUFFER SETBACK (TYP) 25 FT WETLAND BUFFER SETBACK (TYP) 25 FT WETLAND BUFFER SETBACK (TYP) 15 FT LANDSCAPE SETBACK (TYP) 25 FT PARKING SETBACK (TYP) 50 FT BUILDING SETBACK (TYP) 15 FT LANDSCAPE SETBACK (TYP) 25 FT PARKING SETBACK (TYP) 50 FT BUILDING SETBACK (TYP) 15 FT LANDSCAPE SETBACK (TYP) 50 FT PARKING SETBACK (TYP) 100 FT BUILDING SETBACK (TYP) 15 FT LANDSCAPE SETBACK (TYP) 50 FT PARKING SETBACK (TYP) 100 FT BUILDING SETBACK (TYP) 15 FT LANDSCAPE SETBACK (TYP) 50 FT PARKING SETBACK (TYP) 100 FT BUILDING SETBACK (TYP) DELINEATED WETLAND DELINEATED WETLAND DELINEATED WETLAND DELINEATED WETLAND PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT 60. 0 ' 26 ' 26 '9' TYP 9' TYP 64 ' 977' 977' 97 7 ' 262' 20 0 ' 60 ' 60 ' 80 ' 19 ' 26 ' 19 ' 12' TYP 12' TYP 10' 64' 9' TY P 9' TY P 19'19' 26' 26' 26' 120' 12 ' TY P DELINEATED WETLAND DELINEATED WETLAND DELINEATED WETLAND DELINEATED WETLAND DELINEATED WETLAND 26 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 30 . 0 ' STORM POND ±21,000 SF 30.0' STORM POND ±43,000 SF 26 . 0 ' 60'60' 26 ' 21 0 ' 21 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 17 ' 17 ' 17 ' 17 ' 17 ' 17 ' 19 ' 26 ' 19 ' 9' TYP 9' TYP 30 ' SCREEN WALL SCREEN WALL SCREEN WALL SCREEN WALL SCREEN WALL 30' SCREEN WALL PROPOSED DEDICATED RIGHT TURN LANE PROPOSED DEDICATED RIGHT TURN LANE 25 FT WETLAND BUFFER SETBACK (TYP) PROPOSED DEDICATED RIGHT TURN LANE PROPOSED DEDICATED 600' THRU LANE 660' THRU LANE TAPER PROPOSED SHOULDER EXPANSION PROPOSED DEDICATED LEFT TURN LANE CO N C E P T SI T E PL A N EX-2 CA T E S M E D I N A IN D U S T R I A L ME D I N A MN DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 7 7 4 0 5 4 03 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 2 AS S H O W N CJ J ZT R MC B IMPACTED WETLAND Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 20 1 8 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ O P P I D A N \ C a t e s M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ E x h i b i t s \ E X - 1 _ C o n c e p t S i t e P l a n _ E A W . d w g M a r c h 2 3 , 2 0 2 2 - 1 0 : 4 4 a m © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE LEGEND DELINEATED WETLAND BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 68.9 AC EXISTING WETLANDS ON SITE 5.04 AC (7.32% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) PROPOSED WETLANDS IMPACT 1.61 AC (2.34% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) BUILDING AREA 15.29 AC (22.20% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) PARKING TRAILER DOCK DOORS (PROPOSED)219 SPACES ASSOCIATE PARKING (PROPOSED)585 SPACES REQUIRED PARKING 333 SPACES REQUIRED ADA PARKING 12 SPACES ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING RR-UR - RUAL RESIDENTIAL-URBAN RESERVE PROPOSED ZONING BP - BUSINESS PARK BUILDING/ PARKING SETBACKS FRONT (MAJOR ROAD) = 100' FRONT (MINOR ROAD) = 50' RESIDENTIAL = 50' SIDE/REAR = 20' NO R T H PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT widening for turn lane lengthen dedicated left turn lane MECH WAREHOUSE PROPOSED BUILDING: 206,002 GSF 21 0 ' - 0 " 977'-0" WALLS TOTAL : 90212 CLASS 1 TOTAL: 20289 CLASS 1 PERCENTAGE TOTAL: 23% WALL: 37126 GSF CLASS 1: 14909 GSF CLASS 1 PERCENTAGE: 40 %BRICK MTL. COPING ACM FULL CANOPY EXPOSED AGGREGATE PRECAST PANEL HM DOOR STOREFRONT STOREFRONT WALLS TOTAL : 90212 CLASS 1 TOTAL: 20289 CLASS 1 PERCENTAGE TOTAL: 23% WALL: 7980 GSF CLASS 1: 2442 GSF CLASS 1 PERCENTAGE: 31 %BRICK MTL. COPING ACM FULL CANOPY STOREFRONT BRICKCLERESTORY HM DOOR WALLS TOTAL : 90212 CLASS 1 TOTAL: 20289 CLASS 1 PERCENTAGE TOTAL: 23% WALL: 7980 GSF CLASS 1: 2442 GSF CLASS 1 PERCENTAGE: 31 % WALLS TOTAL : 90212 CLASS 1 TOTAL: 20289 CLASS 1 PERCENTAGE TOTAL: 23% WALL: 37126 GSF CLASS 1: 744 GSF CLASS 1 PERCENTAGE: 2% N MEDINA SPEC INDUSTRIAL OPTION-1 MEDINA, MN 11/09/21 1" = 30'-0"P1-1 2 OPTION 1 - ELEVATION - SOUTH 1" = 30'-0"P1-1 3 OPTION 1 - ELEVATION - EAST 1" = 30'-0"P1-1 4 OPTION 1 - ELEVATION - WEST 1" = 30'-0"P1-1 5 OPTION 1 - ELEVATION - NORTH AGGREGATE 1: LIGHT BUFF AGGREGATE 1: DARK BUFF BRICK: DARK NEUTRAL ACM: LIGHT NEUTRAL MECH WAREHOUSE PROPOSED BUILDING: 205,810 GSF 21 0 ' - 0 " 977'-0" WALLS TOTAL : 90212 CLASS 1 TOTAL: 19605 CLASS 1 PERCENTAGE TOTAL: 22% WALL: 37126 GSF CLASS 1: 14613 GSF CLASS 1 PERCENTAGE: 39%BRICK MTL. COPING ACM FULL CANOPY STOREFRONT BRICK ACM PANEL STOREFRONT ACM PANEL INDUSTRIAL LOUVERS INC: 6" DEEP ALUMINUM BAND ON STANDOFFS - OR PAINTED CONCRETE BAND HM DOOR STOREFRONT WALLS TOTAL : 90212 CLASS 1 TOTAL: 19605 CLASS 1 PERCENTAGE TOTAL: 22% WALL: 7980 GSF CLASS 1: 2124 GSF CLASS 1 PERCENTAGE: 27 %BRICK MTL. COPING STOREFRONT ACM PANEL INDUSTRIAL LOUVERS INC: 6" DEEP ALUMINUM BAND ON STANDOFFS - OR PAINTED CONCRETE BAND CLERESTORY HM DOOR BRICK ACM PANEL WALLS TOTAL : 90212 CLASS 1 TOTAL: 19605 CLASS 1 PERCENTAGE TOTAL: 22% WALL: 7980 GSF CLASS 1: 2124 GSF CLASS 1 PERCENTAGE: 27 % WALLS TOTAL : 90212 CLASS 1 TOTAL: 19605 CLASS 1 PERCENTAGE TOTAL: 22% WALL: 37126 GSF CLASS 1: 744 GSF CLASS 1 PERCENTAGE: 2% N MEDINA SPEC INDUSTRIAL OPTION-3 MEDINA, MN 11/09/21 1" = 30'-0"P3-1 2 OPTION 3 - ELEVATION - SOUTH 1" = 30'-0"P3-1 3 OPTION 3 - ELEVATION - EAST 1" = 30'-0"P3-1 4 OPTION 3 - ELEVATION - WEST 1" = 30'-0"P3-1 5 OPTION 3 - ELEVATION - NORTH AGGREGATE 1: LIGHT BUFF AGGREGATE 1: DARK BUFF BRICK: DARK NEUTRAL ACM: LIGHT NEUTRAL ACM: COOL TONE Weston Woods Page 1 of 6 April 5, 2022 PUD and Plat Amendment City Council Meeting TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: March 30, 2022 MEETING: April 5, 2022 City Council SUBJECT: Weston Woods – Mark and Kathleen Smith – Amended PUD and Plat - East of Mohawk Dr., North of Hwy 55 Summary of Request Mark and Kathleen Smith have requested an amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Plat for Weston Woods of Medina. The applicant proposes the following primary changes: 1) Change 10 twin-home lots to 9 detached villa lots in NE portion of site (reduction of one lot) 2) Widen single-family lots throughout southern portion of site (reduction of two lots) 3) Allow option for one single-family lot to be used for community pool 4) Amend certain lot standards The City Council granted approval of the PUD in January 2021 and Final Plat approval in October 2021. These approvals would still be in place if the City does not approve the amendments to the PUD. The approvals were subject to a series of requirements and conditions which are not significantly affected by the proposed changes. Information on the review of the previously approved application is available upon request. Comprehensive Plan Most of the subject property (45 net acres) was reguided to Low Density Residential (LDR) in 2020, requiring residential density of 2-3 units/net acre. The proposed amendment would change the density from 2.62 units/net acre to Prev. approved Proposed Attached townhomes 32 32 Twinhomes 76 66 Detached Villas 0 9 Single-family 42 40 Total Lots 150 147 MEMORANDUM Agenda Item #7C Weston Woods Page 2 of 6 April 5, 2022 PUD and Plat Amendment City Council Meeting 2.56 units/net acre. A smaller 4.7 net acre area in the east central portion of the site is guided Medium Density Residential (MDR) and planned for attached townhomes. No amendments are proposed to that portion of the PUD and plat at this time. Proposed Amendment – Villahome Lots The applicant proposes to plat 9 detached villa lots in the northeast portion of the site rather than 10 twinhome lots previously approved. The applicant proposes the following lot standards for the villahome lots, which are compared to the underlying R2 zoning district: R2 Proposed Villahomes Minimum Lot Size 8,000 s.f. 6,000 s.f. (>9,000 s.f. w/ open space behind units) Minimum Lot Width 60 feet 60 feet Minimum Lot Depth 90 feet 1000 feet Front Yard Setback 25 feet 25’ to curb (equiv. to 13’ to right-of-way) Front Yard Setback (garage) 25 feet 25’ to curb (equiv. to 13’ to right-of-way) Side Yard Setback (combined) 15 feet (10/5) 15 feet (7.5/7.5) Side Yard (corner) 25 feet 25 feet Rear Yard Setback 25 feet 25 feet Max. Hardcover 50% 70% of platted lot; < 50% if including boulevard and open space behind lots While the table above compares the proposed villahomes to the R2 district standards, staff believes it is important to compare the proposed lots to the Twinhome standards as well. If the City were not to approved the amendment, these lots would remain Twinhome Lots under the approved PUD. The Twinhome standards are described in the next section. Proposed Amendment – Twinhome Lots The applicant requests to amend the PUD to reduce the minimum required setback between Twinhome buildings from 30 feet to 25 feet. Below are approved standards for the Twinhome Lots with the proposed change highlighted. Twinhomes Lots Minimum Lot Size 3,948 s.f. (>5,000 s.f. including open space between lots) Minimum Lot Width 42 feet Minimum Lot Depth 90 feet Front Yard Setback 25’ to curb (equiv. to 13’ to right-of-way) Front Yard Setback (garage) 25’ to curb (equiv. to 13’ to right-of-way) Side Yard Setback 30 feet between buildings {25’ proposed} Side Yard (corner) 25 feet Rear Yard Setback 15 feet Max. Hardcover 70% of platted lot; (<50% if including boulevard and open space between buildings The proposed distance between buildings is equivalent to the minimum setbacks of the R1 district and exceed the minimum setbacks of the R2 district. Staff does not oppose the amendment. Weston Woods Page 3 of 6 April 5, 2022 PUD and Plat Amendment City Council Meeting Proposed Amendment – Single-Family Lots The applicant proposes to increase the width and lot area of many of the single-family lots in the southern portion of the site from what was shown on the approved plat. The lots would still occupy the same overall footprint on the site. Because larger lots are proposed within the same area, the change would result in a net reduction of two lots. The applicant does not propose to amend the minimum lot width or lot size of the PUD. Since these are minimum standards, the lots can be platted to exceed the standards by a larger degree. The applicant does propose one alteration to the lot standards of Single-Family lots. The applicant proposes to increase the maximum hardcover permitted on the lots from 40% to 45%. The lot standards of the Single-Family Lots within the PUD are described below compared to the requirements of either the R1 or R2 district. The proposed amendment is highlighted. R1 R2 Proposed Single Family Minimum Lot Size 11,000 s.f. 8,000 s.f. 9,000 s.f. Minimum Lot Width 90 feet 60 feet 70 feet Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 90 feet 130 feet Front Yard Setback 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Front Yard Setback (garage) 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Side Yard Setback (combined) 25 feet (15&10) 15 feet (10&5) 20 feet (10 & 10) Side Yard (corner) 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet Collector Road Setback 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Max. Hardcover 40% 50% 40% {45% proposed} The proposed PUD standards commonly fall between the requirements of the R1 and R2 district. The proposed amendment would similarly split the difference between the City’s standard districts. The applicant requests this additional hardcover to allow flexibility for sport courts, patios, swimming pools, and similar improvements. Staff does not oppose the proposed amendment, which seems consistent with the standards which fall between the R1 and R2 districts. Proposed Amendment – Allow Community Pool The applicant requests language within the PUD which would explicitly allow one of the single- family lots to be used for a community pool and amenity space. The applicant requests the flexibility to decide in the future whether to construct the pool or to build a home on the lot. The layout of the lot would remain the same. The applicant has identified either Lot 1, Block 1 or Lot 5, Block 6 as a potential location. These lots are located just south of Chippewa Road, either east or west of Hillside Drive and are circled in blue on the site plan on page 1. Staff supports allowing this flexibility. The pool and any structure would be subject to the same setbacks as homes on the Single-Family Lots. Staff believes it may be advisable to consider widening Hillside Drive adjacent to these lots by a few feet to accommodate more common parking, or to add nose-in parking as part of the site improvements, especially with the location near the intersection with Chippewa Road. Weston Woods Page 4 of 6 April 5, 2022 PUD and Plat Amendment City Council Meeting Review Criteria The City has a high level of discretion when considering requests for PUD, and similarly has a high level of discretion when considering proposed amendments to a PUD. Section 827.41 of the Code describe the process for reviewing proposed amendments and modifications from the terms or conditions of a PUD or an alteration in a project. This section states that review of any amendment would follow the same review procedure as was followed with respect to the General Plan of Development. Purpose of PUD Section 827.25 of the City Code establishes the following purpose for PUDs: “PUD - Planned Unit Development provisions are established to provide comprehensive procedures and standards designed to allow greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and/or nonresidential areas by incorporating design modifications and allowing for a mixture of uses. The PUD process, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Code related to setbacks, lot area, width and depth, yards, and other development standards is intended to encourage: Subd. 1. Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design, and placement of structures and by the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. Subd. 2. Higher standards of site and building design. Subd. 3. The preservation, enhancement, or restoration of desirable site characteristics such as high quality natural resources, wooded areas, wetlands, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. Subd. 4. Innovative approaches to stormwater management and low-impact development practices which result in volume control and improvement to water quality beyond the standard requirements of the City. Subd. 5. Maintenance of open space in portions of the development site, preferably linked to surrounding open space areas, and also enhanced buffering from adjacent roadways and lower intensity uses. Subd. 6. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly development and use pattern and more convenience in location and design of development and service facilities. Subd. 7. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lower development costs and public investments. Subd. 8. A development pattern that effectuates the objectives of the Medina Comprehensive Plan. (PUD is not intended as a means to vary applicable planning and zoning principles.) Subd. 9. A more desirable and creative environment than might be possible through the strict application on zoning and subdivision regulations of the City.” When the City is considering the initial rezoning to a PUD, the City is considering this purpose when determining whether to approve of the rezoning of a property from the underlying district to a PUD. The Planning Commission and Council are weighing whether the proposed flexibility of the PUD better meets these and other objectives of the City than would be achieved through standard zoning. When considering proposed amendments to a PUD, staff believes it is appropriate to consider the purpose of the PUD and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. However, it is appropriate to approach the calculation differently. If the City does not approve of the amendment, the previously approved PUD would still be in place. Weston Woods Page 5 of 6 April 5, 2022 PUD and Plat Amendment City Council Meeting Based upon the scale or significance of the proposed amendment, it may not clearly meet the criteria but still be acceptable. On the other hand, if the Planning Commission and City Council find that an amendment is inconsistent with these purposes and other City objectives when compared to the unamended PUD, it may be appropriate to deny the amendment. Staff has attached relevant excerpts from the Vision, Goals, and Land Use chapters of the Comprehensive Plan for convenience. Preliminary Plat Criteria The City generally has a lower level of discretion on review of the preliminary plat, but in this case the plat is contingent upon approval of the PUD. If the PUD is approved, review of the preliminary plat is guided by Subd. 10 of Section 820.21: In the case of all subdivisions, the City shall deny approval of a preliminary or final plat if one or a combination of the following finding are made: (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city, or that the proposed subdivision is premature, as defined in Section 820.28. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. Staff does not believe the reduction of three lots and proposed amendments to the plat change any of the findings for the plat from what was previously decided when approving the original version of the plat. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments at the March 8 meeting. An excerpt from the draft meeting minutes is attached. No comments were received at the public hearing. Planning Commissioners generally supported conversion of some of the lots to villas and the widening of the single-family lots. Follow discussion, the Commission unanimously recommended approval. Weston Woods Page 6 of 6 April 5, 2022 PUD and Plat Amendment City Council Meeting Potential Action The proposed amendments to the previously approved PUD are: 1) Create 9 Villahome Lots in place of 10 Twinhome Lots (and create standards for the lots) 2) Increase width and size of Single Family Lots (resulting in reduction of 2 lots) 3) Add explicit allowance for one Single-Family Lot to be used for community pool 4) Reduce minimum distance between Twinhome buildings from 30 feet to 25 feet 5) Increase maximum hardcover on Single-Family Lots from 40% to 45% Staff believes it is reasonable to find that the proposed amendments are acceptable within the context of the previously approved PUD. Staff does not believe the proposed amendments to the PUD and plat significantly change the conditions attached to the final plat which was previously approved, unless the Planning Commission recommends widening the street adjacent to the potential community pool site for more space for parking. If the City Council concurs that the amendment is not inconsistent with the purpose of the PUD ordinance, objectives of the Comp Plan, and findings of the subdivision ordinance, the following motion could be made: Move to direct staff to prepare documents approving the amendment to the Weston Woods PUD and plat. Attachments 1. Comp Plan Info 2. Excerpt from draft 3/8/2022 Planning Commission minutes 3. PUD Ordinance with proposed amendments 4. Applicant narrative 5. Updated Plat 6. Updated Plans Excerpts from Comprehensive Plan Community Vision The following statement provides a vision of the community for the future and the resultant goals and strategies. Medina is a community united by a common goal: to sustain and enhance the quality of life of its residents. Medina will protect its significant natural resources and open space throughout the City, while honoring its rural heritage and fostering safe and well-designed neighborhoods, places of recreation and destinations for citizens to gather. Development within the City will be commensurate with available transportation systems, municipal services and school capacity. Community Goals The following Community Goals are derived from the Vision Statement and inform objectives and strategies throughout the various aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. • Preserve rural vistas, open spaces, and wetlands in all parts of the community to promote the rural character of Medina. • Protect and enhance the environment and natural resources throughout the community. • Encourage and incent innovative and environmentally friendly approaches to planning, engineering and development. • Expand urban services only as necessary to accommodate regionally forecasted residential growth, desired business opportunities and achievement of other Community Goals. Such development and growth shall be at a sustainable pace proportionate with capacity of schools and transportation, water supply and wastewater infrastructure available to the City. • Spread development so that it is not geographically concentrated during particular timeframes. • Promote public and private gathering places and civic events that serve the entire community. • Preserve and expand trails and parks to provide community recreational facilities, connect neighborhoods, and encourage healthy lifestyles of its residents. • Provide opportunities for a diversity of housing at a range of costs to support residents at all stages of their lives. • Encourage an attractive, vibrant business community that complements the residential areas of the City. • Maintain its commitment to public safety through support of the City’s police department and coordinate with its contracted volunteer fire departments. • Manage the City through prudent budgeting processes, retaining a skilled and efficient staff and long-range planning and financial management. Future Land Use Plan Principles The Future Land Use Plan guides the development of Medina through 2040, and will be used to implement the City’s goals, strategies and policies. The Plan is guided by the Vision and Community Goals as furthered by the following principles: Development Patterns and Neighborhood Form • Encourage open spaces, parks and trails in all neighborhood developments. Surveys indicate that a high quality of life is found when residents have visual access to green spaces. • Create neighborhoods with a variety of housing types that are well connected with roads, trails or sidewalks. • Maintain the integrity of rural neighborhoods and promote development patterns consistent with existing rural residential development. • Recognize neighborhood characteristics and promote new development compatible in scale, architectural quality and style with existing neighborhoods. • Stage residential growth to minimize the amount of adjacent developments which occur within the same time period. • Guide density to areas with proximity to existing infrastructure and future infrastructure availability. • Concentrate higher density development near service oriented businesses to help promote walkability. • Consider planned development in surrounding communities when making land use decisions in the City. Road Patterns • Recognize regional highway capacity and planned improvements, along with use forecasts, as major factors in planning for growth and land use changes. • Establish collector streets with good connections through the community’s growth areas. • Promote trails and sidewalk access near roads and thoroughfares to encourage multi- modal transportation choices. • Consider opportunities to improve north-south travel within the City. Open Spaces and Natural Resources • Preserve natural resources throughout the community and provide educational opportunities to residents to help them understand the value of natural areas. • Preserve open spaces and natural resources. • Protect wooded areas and encourage improvement of existing resources and reforestation. Evaluate existing woodland protections and supplement as necessary. • Support the guidelines identified in the Open Space Report to preserve the City’s natural systems. Business Districts and Commercial Areas • Focus service businesses and development near urban residential densities and along primary transportation corridors. • Provide connections between residents and commercial areas and promote businesses within mixed-use areas. • Work to create job opportunities in the community for Medina residents to reduce traffic and commuting demands. • Emphasize service and retail uses which serve the needs of the local community and provide opportunities for the community to gather. • Support business development with a corporate campus style which provides open spaces and protects natural resources. Low Density Residential (LDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 2.0 units per acre and 3.0.units per acre which are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The primary use in this area is single- and two-family residential development. Residential Uses Objectives: 1. Require preservation of natural slopes, wetlands, woodlands, and other significant natural characteristics of the property. 2. Consider exceptions to or modifications of density restrictions for developments that protect the natural features or exceed other standards of the zoning district. Such modification shall generally not exceed -10% of the minimum density or +20% of the maximum density requirement of the relevant land use. 3. Restrict urban development to properties within the sewer service boundary. 4. Regulate land within the Mixed Residential land use to provide opportunities for residential development with a density in excess of 8 units/acre. Flexibility is purposefully provided within the land use to support opportunities for a single project to provide both low- and high- density housing or for multiple developers to partner on independent projects within a Mixed Residential area. 5. Encourage green building practices such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) principles in neighborhood planning and residential building and low impact development design standards. 6. Regulate the rate and location of development in keeping with availability of public facilities and the City's stated goals, including the undesignated MUSA and growth strategies. 7. Restrict commercial and business development to areas designated in this Plan. 8. Protect property within the City's MUSA boundary from development prior to the provision of urban services that will hinder future division. 9. Create flexible zoning standards that would allow for innovative arrangements of homes, conservation easements, or other creative land use concepts that preserve the City's open space and natural features. 10. Promote attractive, well-maintained dwellings on functional, clearly marked roads, with adequate facilities and open space. 11. Emphasize resident and pedestrian safety. 12. Encourage a controlled mix of densities, housing types, age groups, economic levels, lot sizes, and living styles that are of appropriate scale and consistent with appropriate land use, market demands, and development standards. 13. Establish design criteria for platting and developing site plans which will be compatible with surrounding physical features, existing land uses and the preservation of ecologically significant natural resources. 14. Establish standards for higher density residential development so that such development is compatible with surrounding uses. Such standards may include enclosed parking, green space, landscape buffering and height limitations. 15. Require utilities to be placed underground wherever possible for reasons of aesthetic enhancement and safety. 16. Plan interconnections between separate developments to encourage shared road use to reduce costs and minimize the amount of road surface required. 17. Require planning of trails and walkway systems in the early design stages of all new development so that residential areas are provided safe access to parks and open space. 18. In urban residential zones with sanitary sewer service permit higher density in PUD’s in exchange for (1) reduced land coverage by buildings, (2) provision of more multi-family units; and, (3) sensitive treatment of natural resources. 19. Implement standards for lot sizes and setbacks which recognize the development characteristics and natural resources of each existing neighborhood. 20. Regulate noise, illumination, and odors as needed to protect residential neighborhoods and to maintain public health and safety. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 03/08/2022 Minutes 1 Public Hearing – Weston Woods of Medina – Planned Unit Development and Plat Amendment – Mark and Kathleen Smith – East of Mohawk Drive, North of Hwy 55 Finke presented a requested amendment to a previously approved Planned Unit Development and Plat for Weston Woods of Medina. He provided details on the approved subdivision and noted that since the time of approval the applicant has proposed to make some changes to the units proposed. He summarized the proposed changes which includes changing 10 twinhome lots to nine villa home lots, widening single-family lots, allow an option for a single-family lot to be used for a community pool, reduction of the minimum setbacks between the twinhomes, and increase the maximum hardcover for single-family. He noted that the changes would result in a reduction of the density from 2.62 units per acre to 2.56 units per acre. He summarized the review criteria noting that the previous approval would stay in place if the amendment were not approved. Mark Smith, applicant, noted that he is present to address any questions the Commission may have. Nielsen opened the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. No comments made. Nielsen closed the public hearing at 7:17 p.m. Piper commented that the changes proposed appear to be nicely done. Nielsen agreed that the changes are nicely done and confirmed that there were no other comments or questions from the Commission. Motion by Rhem, seconded by Jacob, to recommend approval of the amendment to the Weston Woods PUD and Plat. A roll call vote was performed: Jacob aye Piper aye Rhem aye Sedabres aye Nielsen aye Motion carries unanimously Ordinance No. 667___ 1 January 5, 2021___________ __, 2022 CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. 667___ AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR “WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA” AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP THE CITY COUNCIL OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Medina received a request to change the zoning classification of the property legally described in Exhibit A (the “Property”) to Planned Unit Development. Based on the written and oral record before the Planning Commission and City Council during review of the request as well as all additional testimony submitted to the City, the City Council has found that the proposed rezoning of the Property to Planned Unit Development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and serves the purpose of the Planned Unit Development district. Section 2. The Property is hereby rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The location of the zoning amendment is depicted on the map in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Section 3. The Weston Woods of Medina Planned Unit Development General Plan is hereby approved. A. All entitlements, including but not limited to, allowed uses, density, dimensional standards, setbacks and development standards established within this PUD District are hereby set forth by the Weston Woods General Plan dated 12/4/2020, which are incorporated herein by reference, except as may be modified by this ordinance or Resolution 2021-03. B. Any standards not specifically addressed by this Ordinance shall be subject to the requirements set forth by the City of Medina Zoning Ordinance, including the Single- and Two-Family Residential (“R2”) and Mid-Density Residential (“R3”) zoning districts and other relevant standards. C. The lots within the Property shall be classified as “Single Family,” “Twinhome,” “Villahome” or “Rowhome” as described in Exhibit B and shall be subject to the relevant standards described herein. Section 4. Allowed Uses. The allowed uses within the PUD District shall be as follows: A. Single Family Lots. The permitted, conditional, and accessory uses shall be those described in the R2 zoning district. A community pool shall allowed on a single family lot within the PUD. B. Twinhome Lots. The permitted, conditional, and accessory uses shall be those described in the R2 zoning district, except that Accessory Dwelling Units shall not be permitted. Ordinance No. 667___ 2 January 5, 2021___________ __, 2022 C. Villahome Lots. The permitted, conditional, and accessory uses shall be those described in the R2 zoning district, except that Accessory Dwelling Units shall not be permitted. C.D. Rowhome Lots. i. The following shall be permitted uses within the Rowhome Lots: a. Townhouse Dwellings, provided no structure contains more than six dwelling units b. Parks and Open Space c. Essential Services ii. There shall be no conditional uses permitted within the Rowhome Lots iii. The accessory uses shall be those described in the R3 zoning district. Section 5. Lot Standards. A. The Single Family Lots shall be subject to the requirements of the R2 zoning district except as explicitly described below. i. Minimum lot size: 9,000 square feet ii. Minimum lot width: 70 feet iii. Minimum lot depth: 130 feet iv. Minimum front yard setback: 25 feet, except garage doors facing the street shall be setback a minimum of 30 feet v. Minimum side yard setback: 10 feet vi. Minimum rear yard setback: 30 feet. The rear yard setback may be reduced to 20 feet if abutting a preserved open space or common area, but may not be reduced if abutting public park property. vii. Minimum Collector Roadway setback: 40 feet viii. Maximum impervious surface coverage: 4045% B. The Twinhome Lots shall be subject to the requirements of the R2 zoning district except as explicitly described below. i. Minimum lot size: 3,948 square feet ii. Minimum lot width: 42 feet iii. Minimum lot depth: 90 feet iv. Minimum front yard setback: 25 feet to back of curb v. Minimum distance between buildings: 3025 feet. Bay windows, balconies, eaves, overhangs, canopies and other ornamental features not affixed to the ground may extend into this setback, provided they do not extend a distance greater than three feet from the structure. vi. Minimum side yard setback: 5 feet, except the side yard setback shall be reduced to zero for the common wall between two dwelling units. Bay windows, balconies, eaves, overhangs, canopies and other ornamental features not affixed to the ground may extend into this setback. vii. Minimum rear yard setback: 15 feet viii. Minimum Collector Roadway setback: 40 feet ix. Maximum impervious surface coverage: 70% Ordinance No. 667___ 3 January 5, 2021___________ __, 2022 C. The Villahome Lots shall be subject to the requirements of the R2 zoning district except as explicitly described below. i. Minimum lot size: 6,000 square feet ii. Minimum lot width: 60 feet iii. Minimum lot depth: 100 feet iv. Minimum front yard setback: 25 feet to back of curb v. Minimum distance between buildings: Based on side yard setback, except bay windows, balconies, eaves, overhangs, canopies and other ornamental features not affixed to the ground may extend into this setback, provided they do not extend a distance greater than three feet from the structure. vi. Minimum side yard setback: 7.5 feet. Bay windows, balconies, eaves, overhangs, canopies and other ornamental features not affixed to the ground may extend into this setback. vii. Maximum impervious surface coverage: 70% C.D. The Rowhome Lots shall be subject to the requirements of the R3 zoning district except as explicitly described below. i. Minimum Setback from Perimeter of Site: 40 feet ii. Private street setback: 23 feet to back of curb iii. Collector Roadway Setback: 40 feet iv. Minimum distance between buildings: 24 feet Section 6. Design and Development Standards. All standards not specified by this ordinance are to be the same as found in the Medina Zoning Ordinance for the relevant underlying zoning district. The following deviations from the underlying performance standards are hereby in place for the Weston Woods of Medina Planned Unit Development: A. Building Materials and Design shall be consistent with the standards approved by the City Council at the time of final plat review, which shall be subject to review for consistency with the enhancements required in Resolution 2021-03. B. Landscaping shall be consistent with the landscaping plan approved by the City Council at the time of final plat review, which shall be subject to review for consistency with the enhancements required in Resolution 2021-03. Section 7. The City of Medina Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to place this ordinance into effect and to make the appropriate changes to the official zoning map of the City of Medina to reflect the change in zoning classifications as set forth above only upon adoption of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment related to the Property and recording of the Weston Woods of Medina plat. Section 8. A copy of this Ordinance and the updated map shall be kept on file at the Medina City Hall. Ordinance No. 667___ 4 January 5, 2021___________ __, 2022 Section 9. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, publication, and recording of the Weston Woods of Medina of Medina plat. Adopted by the Medina City Council this 5th day of January, 2021April, 2022. CITY OF MEDINA By: Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: By: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk Published in the Crow River News on this day the 14th___ of January, 2021_____, 2022. Ordinance No. 667___ 5 January 5, 2021___________ __, 2022 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property Ordinance No. 667___ 6 January 5, 2021___________ __, 2022 Ordinance No. 667___ 7 January 5, 2021___________ __, 2022 Ordinance No. 667___ 8 January 5, 2021___________ __, 2022 Ordinance No. 667___ 9 January 5, 2021___________ __, 2022 EXHIBIT B Map Depicting “Single Family,” “Twinhome,” and “Rowhome” Lots 4875-4002-4847, v. 2 February 24, 2022 Dusty Finke AICP City Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: Weston Woods of Medina; PUD Amendment for PIDs 03-118-23-42-0001, 03-118-23- 41-0001, and 03-118-23-43-0005 Dear Mr. Finke: We represent Mark of Excellence Homes (“MOE”) and Mark and Kathleen Smith, the developer of Weston Woods of Medina (the “Project”). This letter and the accompanying materials constitute a request for amendment of the PUD to address market conditions and demand for a variety of housing types, including Villahomes within the Project. Background and Project Description The Developer of the above project obtained approval of Comprehensive Plan amendments, rezoning and PUD Development Plan from the City of Medina (the “City”) for what are described below as Twinhomes, Rowhomes and Single-Family lots. In addition, with City approval, the Developer has commenced construction of public improvements contained within the approved PUD Development Plan. In response to market conditions and the input of home builders, the Developer has made modest adjustments to dimensional requirements and added Villahomes as a product type. Pursuant to Section 830, Subd. 3(i), the Developer has applied to amend the PUD to provide for these changes. In summary, the Twinhomes will be reduced from 76 units to 66 units. Nine Villahomes will be added to the mix of housing. Single-family lots will be reduced from 42 units to 40 units with one lot reserved for a possible community swimming pool. Proposed Minimum Standards Concurrent with this amendment, the City will consider adoption of an ordinance updating and establishing minimum standards for the PUD, including the following: A. The Single Family Lots shall be subject to the requirements of the R2 zoning district except as explicitly described below. i. Minimum lot size: 9,000 square feet Dusty Finke AICP February 24, 2022 Page 2 ii. Minimum lot width: 70 feet iii. Minimum lot depth: 130 feet iv. Minimum front yard setback: 25 feet, except garage doors facing the street shall be setback a minimum of 30 feet v. Minimum side yard setback: 10 feet vi. Minimum rear yard setback: 30 feet. The rear yard setback may be reduced to 20 feet if abutting a preserved open space or common area, but may not be reduced if abutting public park property. vii. Minimum Collector Roadway setback: 40 feet viii. Maximum impervious surface coverage: 45% B. The Twinhome Lots shall be subject to the requirements of the R2 zoning district except as explicitly described below. i. Minimum lot size: 3,948 square feet ii. Minimum lot width: 42 feet iii. Minimum lot depth: 90 feet iv. Minimum front yard setback: 25 feet to back of curb v. Minimum distance between buildings: 25 feet. Bay windows, balconies, eaves, overhangs, canopies and other ornamental features not affixed to the ground may extend into this setback, provided they do not extend a distance greater than three feet from the structure. vi. Minimum side yard setback: 5 feet, except the side yard setback shall be reduced to zero for the common wall between two dwelling units. Bay windows, balconies, eaves, overhangs, canopies and other ornamental features not affixed to the ground may extend into this setback. vii. Minimum rear yard setback: 15 feet viii. Minimum Collector Roadway setback: 40 feet ix. Maximum impervious surface coverage: 70% C. The Villahome Lots shall be subject to the requirements of the R2 zoning district except as explicitly described below. i. Minimum lot size: 6,000 square feet ii. Minimum lot width: 60 feet iii. Minimum lot depth: 100 feet iv. Minimum front yard setback: 25 feet to back of curb v. Minimum distance between buildings: Based on side yard setback, except bay windows, balconies, eaves, overhangs, canopies and other ornamental features not affixed to the ground may extend into this setback, provided they do not extend a distance greater than three feet from the structure. vi. Minimum side yard setback: 7.5 feet. Bay windows, balconies, eaves, overhangs, canopies and other ornamental features not affixed to the ground may extend into this setback. vii. Maximum impervious surface coverage: 70% Dusty Finke AICP February 24, 2022 Page 3 D. The Rowhome Lots shall be subject to the requirements of the R3 zoning district except as explicitly described below. i. Minimum Setback from Perimeter of Site: 40 feet ii. Private street setback: 23 feet to back of curb iii. Collector Roadway Setback: 40 feet iv. Minimum distance between buildings: 24 feet The changes contained within this amendment are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as well as the findings and criteria for approval of the PUD for Weston Woods of Medina. Please contact me with any questions about the above narrative or the enclosed materials. Sincerely, William C. Griffith, for Larkin Hoffman Direct Dial: 952-896-3290 Direct Fax: 952-842-1729 Email: wgriffith@larkinhoffman.com cc: Mark Smith 4879-9314-1007, v. 2 4 3 2 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1234 56 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 OUTLOT I 11 INSET A See sheet 4 of 7 sheets INSET B See sheet 5 of 7 sheets WET LAND WET LAND WET LAND WET LAND MATCH LINE See sheet 3 of 9 sheets 493.55 N89°23'02"W 1979.01 N89°23'02"W R =6 7 4 .0 0 Δ =2 2 °2 1 '0 7 "2 6 2 .9 4 R=521.00 Δ=68°46'44" 625.42 189.5 8 N 6 8 ° 1 5 ' 5 1 " E Δ =2 6 °11 '0 6 "2 8 9 .7 5 698.92 S45 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " W 112 . 4 6 Δ =34°46'40" R =2 8 0.00 169.96 28 7 . 0 8 N 1 0 ° 4 3 ' 2 0 " E Δ=11°25'53" R=903.74 180.31 N2 2 ° 0 9 ' 0 9 " E 13 8 . 4 0 S00°37'28"W 30.02 R=170.00 Δ=10°06'25" 29.99 53 4 . 3 4 S 1 0 ° 4 3 ' 5 3 " W R=870.89 Δ=11°25'46" 173.73 S22°09'39"W 86.32 51 8 . 9 6 N 0 1 ° 1 4 ' 2 0 " E R=244.93 Δ=8°35'12" 36.71 N17°25'31"W 44.55 R = 3 9 3 . 6 4 212.95 Δ = 3 0 ° 5 9 ' 4 5 " 10 5 . 0 0 85 . 7 2 32 8 . 2 5 34.27 N13°34'14"E R=1126.89 Δ=0°20'29" 6.72 2676.18 S89°42'49"E 26.21 1766.15850.82 33 . 0 0 Drainage and Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT I Drainage and Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT J 26 4 0 . 4 8 N 0 0 ° 2 0 ' 4 4 " W 72.70 157.99 1307.31 CHIPPEWA ROAD HA C K A M O R E DR I V E HACKAMORE DRIVE 33 33 33 33 40 40 5 0 50 50 4 0 OUTLOT A N. 1/4 corner of Sec. 3, T. 119, R. 23 Hennepin County Monment N0 0 ° 2 0 ' 4 4 " W 13 3 3 . 4 2 33 N. 1/4 corner of Sec. 3, T. 119, R. 23 Hennepin County Position N0 1 ° 1 4 ' 2 0 " E 13 5 8 . 8 1 927.83 12 9 6 . 9 4 WET LAND North line of the south 1/2 of the northeast 1/4 of Sec. 3, T. 118, R. 23 44 1 . 4 6 51 0 . 9 5 30 33 33 50 WET LAND OUTLOT K OUTLOT KOU T L O T K OU T L O T K OUTLOT L O U T L O T L 10 8 9 12 13 7 OU T L O T F OUTLOT G OUTLOT H OUTLOT H OUTLOT I OUTLOT J Road easement per Doc. No's. 8533496 and 8533497 27 8 . 1 9 66 . 3 4 S64°2 5 ' 5 3 " W 109.2 8 244.42 N 7 0 ° 5 4 ' 1 5 " E Δ =65°58'20"657.47 Δ =60°01'52"493.49 5 0 R=20.00 Δ=84°54'13" 29.64 R=714.00 Δ=00°26'34" 5.52 199.24 40.00 107.91 14 Drainage and Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT J OUTLOT J 1 3 1 . 9 6 S 1 4 ° 1 5 ' 0 6 " E 1 7 0 . 3 1 S 1 4 ° 3 1 ' 5 9 " E S 1 5 ° 4 6 ' 4 1 " E 8 6 . 5 6 S37°27'44"E 65.45 S6 6 ° 1 4 ' 1 1 " E 106 . 4 9 S 5 4 ° 0 1 ' 5 2 " E 1 0 5 . 8 3 1 1 8 . 8 6 S 3 1 ° 5 6 ' 1 0 " E 1 8 2 . 9 4 S 1 2 ° 0 2 ' 0 5 " E N86°11'46"E 41.34 S 3 ° 4 8 ' 1 4 " E 1 0 0 . 6 6 110.00 N86°11'46"E N37 ° 3 1 ' 4 0 " E 123 . 5 5 1 7 0 . 3 4 S 3 2 ° 2 2 ' 0 6 " E 1 5 6 . 6 7 S 2 0 ° 3 5 ' 4 7 " E Dr a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y E a s e m e n t o v e r a l l o f O U T L O T K 83 3 . 0 9 N 1 ° 1 4 ' 2 0 " E Southeast corner of the south 1/2 of the northeast 1/4 of Sec. 3, T. 118, R. 23. Hennepin County CIM (N 0 1 ° 1 3 ' 5 0 " E D e s c . ) WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA NORTH 0 100 200 468.00 46 8 . 0 0 59 0 . 0 0 MATCH LINE See sheet 2 of 9 sheets INSET C See sheet 6 of 7 sheets 1 2 3 4 1 1 2 3 4 2 56 7 8 1 2 33 4 1 2 3 4 5 4 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 45 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 36 5 4 5 OUTLOT E OUTLOT D OUTLOT C OUTLOT A OUTLOT B 493.55 S89°23'02"E 14 6 8 . 0 9 S 2 6 ° 3 3 ' 2 1 " W 332.51 N88°39'29"W 481 . 8 7 S 3 9 ° 2 9 ' 2 2 " W 201. 5 5 N 6 9 ° 5 8 ' 2 0 " W 483. 4 8 N 6 9 ° 5 8 ' 2 0 " W N20°01'40"E 5.00 26 4 0 . 4 8 N 0 0 ° 2 0 ' 4 4 " W 15 4 . 8 2 N 0 0 ° 2 0 ' 4 4 " W 33.01 N88°39'29"W 88.2 7 334. 5 6 60.6 5 12 0 . 8 1 N2 0 ° 0 1 ' 4 0 " E N 2 0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " W 2 2 4 . 6 5 49.25 2 1 . 2 4 50 . 0 0 46 3 . 8 6 N2 0 ° 1 4 ' 1 7 " E 10 8 . 7 7 288 . 8 2 N 5 5 ° 1 3 ' 4 5 " E 54 1 . 0 6 N 2 3 ° 0 6 ' 0 6 " E 17 3 . 2 1 N 6 5 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " W 61 1 . 0 0 WET LAND WET LAND WE T L A N D WET LAND WET LAND WET LAND 13 9 . 2 7 DEERLEAPING BR O O K V I E W C O U R T DR I V E HIL L S I D E MO H A W K D R I V E 1979.01 S89°23'02"E 682.05 50.00 541.58 R =7 14 .0 0 Δ =1 9 °1 6 '1 0 "2 4 0 .1 3 73 50 CHIPPEWA ROAD 40 40 3333 3333 17 5 436.07 S89°23'02"E 166.45 E. 1 / 4 c o r n e r o f Se c . 3 , T . 1 1 9 , R . 2 3 He n n e p i n C o u n t y M o n m e n t E. 1 / 4 c o r n e r o f Se c . 3 , T . 1 1 9 , R . 2 3 He n n e p i n C o u n t y M o n m e n t N89°23'02"W 2649.57 S0 0 ° 2 0 ' 4 4 " E 13 0 3 . 7 2 S. 1/4 corner of Sec. 3, T. 119, R. 23 Hennepin County Monment INSET D See sheet 7 of 7 sheets 152.90444.84 131.32 N89°39'16"E WET LAND CI R C L E Ro a d e a s e m e n t p e r Do c . N o . 9 3 7 4 4 7 Ro a d e a s e m e n t p e r Do c . N o . 9 3 7 4 4 6 Road easement per Doc. No. 937445 24 4 . 8 6 N 2 9 ° 1 3 ' 0 9 " E 197.4 1 N 6 7 ° 3 1 ' 2 2 " E 31 6 . 3 3 N 1 ° 2 5 ' 3 3 " E Road easement per Doc. No. 937448 WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA NORTH 0 100 200 SECTION BREAKDOWN DETAIL N 1/4 Cor. CIM-HCM W 1/4 Cor. CIM-HCM S 1/4 Cor. CIM-HCM E 1/4 Cor. CIM-HCM No Scale SE Cor. CIM-HCM OUTLOT I Drainage and Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT I 5 4 3 2 1 9 8 7 6 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 WE T L A N D WET LAND 62 . 0 0 60 . 0 0 60 . 0 0 60 . 0 0 60 . 0 0 60 . 0 0 60 . 0 0 62 . 0 0 N89°22'58"E 110.84 N89°22'58"E 110.84 N89°22'58"E 110.84 N89°22'58"E 110.84 N89°22'58"E 110.84 N89°22'58"E 110.84 N89°22'58"E 110.00 S78°12'29 " W 68.98 4 6 . 9 7 62 . 0 0 71 . 2 2 62 . 0 0 62 . 0 0 60 . 0 0 60 . 0 0 62 . 0 0 62 . 0 0 62 . 0 0 94 . 1 1 9 6 . 9 5 44 1 . 4 6 850.82 43 4 . 4 6 S 0 0 ° 3 7 ' 0 2 " E 56 . 2 5 55 . 9 8 58 . 0 2 58 . 0 2 55 . 9 8 57 . 2 7 44 8 . 9 1 S 0 0 ° 3 7 ' 0 2 " E 105.38 N89°22'58"E 55 . 3 4 58 . 6 6 50 . 0 0 35.55 58 . 6 6 55 . 3 4 70.1 9 S71° 3 8 ' 3 2 " E N41 ° 5 5 ' 2 0 " E 42. 5 6 18.64 23 . 3 2 N20°03'41"E 15.45 102.90 N89°57'27"E 57 . 3 9 56 . 2 5 N89°22'58"E 110.84 20 110.84 S89°23'31"W 110.84 57 . 3 9 57 . 2 7 47 . 3 4 47 . 3 3 47 . 3 1 47 . 3 5 136.12 N89°22'58"E 26.12 25.2884.72 110.00 N89°22'58"E 10 7 . 3 9 S 0 0 ° 3 7 ' 0 2 " E 10 7 . 3 9 S 0 0 ° 3 7 ' 0 2 " E 50 . 0 0 57 . 3 9 57 . 3 9 50 . 0 0 16 . 2 4 53.0 0 S 6 9 ° 4 5 ' 0 3 " E 133.68 N89°57'27"E 53.0 0 N88°23'13"E 68.48 132 . 5 4 S 4 8 ° 5 7 ' 1 2 " W 1 0 4 . 1 2 N 4 1 ° 0 2 ' 4 8 " W 1 1 8 . 7 5 N 4 1 ° 4 6 ' 4 7 " W 1 4 0 . 5 1 N 2 6 ° 5 3 ' 3 8 " W 1 0 4 . 3 8 N 2 6 ° 5 3 ' 3 8 " W S48 ° 5 7 ' 1 2 " W 110 . 6 4 S56° 2 5 ' 2 3 " W 112. 4 7 S63°0 6 ' 2 2 " W 111.7 1 S74°45' 4 1 " W 114.06 S75°44'5 4 " W 114.04 S75°44'5 4 " W 114.04 5 7 . 0 0 5 5 . 5 9 7 3 . 9 5 6 6 . 5 6 6 8 . 7 4 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 4 . 1 2 5 3 . 4 7 5 0 . 9 1 5 3 . 6 2 5 7 . 0 0 5 7 . 0 0 5 7 . 0 0 4 6 . 8 5 4 7 . 1 5 4 6 . 9 8 4 7 . 0 2 Drainage and Utility Easement Drainage and Utility Easement 2 0 Drainage and Utility Easement S75°44'5 4 " W 114.04 S75°44'5 4 " W 110.001 0 6 . 7 0 N 1 4 ° 1 5 ' 0 6 " W 110.00 S 7 5 ° 4 4 ' 5 4 " W 1 0 6 . 7 0 N 1 4 ° 1 5 ' 0 6 " W 123.76 N 7 5 ° 4 4 ' 5 4 " E 114.04 9.71 13.76 2 2 4 . 9 2 N 1 4 ° 1 5 ' 0 6 " W 2 2 6 . 8 8 N 1 4 ° 1 5 ' 0 6 " W 5 7 . 3 0 5 7 . 3 0 5 6 . 7 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 7 0 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 7 . 0 0 S 1 4 ° 1 5 ' 0 6 " E 1 1 6 . 5 6 S 1 5 ° 0 9 ' 0 6 " E 1 5 0 . 8 1 S 1 5 ° 4 6 ' 4 1 " E 1 3 1 . 9 6 S 1 4 ° 1 5 ' 0 6 " E 1 7 0 . 3 1 S 1 4 ° 3 1 ' 5 9 " E 8 6 . 5 6 S 1 5 ° 4 6 ' 4 1 " E 106 . 4 9 S 6 6 ° 1 4 ' 1 1 " E 119 . 3 9 N 3 6 ° 5 8 ' 0 8 " E 11 3 . 8 8 S 5 8 ° 4 1 ' 5 4 " E 1 1 8 . 3 3 S 3 7 ° 2 7 ' 4 4 " E 112.47 N 7 5 ° 4 4 ' 5 4 " E 5 0 . 0 0 5 7 . 0 0 5 7 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 7 . 0 1 5 9 . 5 5 5 6 . 7 2 7 0 . 0 7 2 4 . 0 3 3 5 . 1 8 5 1 . 3 8 5 6 . 3 6 5 6 . 9 5 5 7 . 0 0 N75°44'5 4 " E 112.47 N75°44'5 4 " E 112.47 N75°44'5 4 " E 111.85 N74°24' 4 0 " E 111.23 N74°13' 1 9 " E 110.00 N64°3 4 ' 5 5 " E 111.5 8 N52 ° 3 2 ' 1 6 " E 105 . 0 0 N42 ° 0 9 ' 1 2 " E 106 . 7 5 N3 1 ° 1 8 ' 0 6 " E 11 0 . 5 6 4 8 . 1 8 7 0 . 1 5 63 . 3 1 50 . 5 7 62. 9 0 43. 5 9 5 0 . 9 1 1 4 . 5 4 OUTLOT H 315.22 S89°55'16"W 315.22 R=120.00 Δ=7 5° 4 9'3 8 " 1 5 8 . 8 1 Δ=75°49'3 8 " 1 0 5 . 8 7 Δ=90°3 2'1 9 " 1 2 6 .4 2 R=120.00 Δ =9 0 °3 2 '1 9 "1 8 9 .6 2 44 8 . 2 8 S 0 0 ° 3 7 ' 0 3 " E 10 7 . 5 6 25 9 . 3 8 179.80 S89°22'57"W 66.14 N89°22'57"E 68.45 N79 ° 2 2 ' 5 7 " E 2 5 0 . 8 2 N 1 4 ° 1 5 ' 0 6 " W 2 5 0 . 8 2 Δ = 4 6 ° 0 6 ' 4 4 " 2 4 1 . 4 4 R = 3 4 0 . 0 0 Δ = 4 6 ° 0 6 ' 4 4 " 2 73. 6 4 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 27 8 . 1 9 66 . 3 4 2 4 . 9 6 175.22 S8 1 ° 0 3 ' 0 7 " E 138 . 0 9 N 5 2 ° 0 4 ' 4 8 " E 23.7 2 70.81 S78°42' 5 5 " E 40 . 0 0 N2 9 ° 3 8 ' 1 0 " E N21°19'58"E 16.00 4 8 9 1 2 34 56 10 11 12 R=205.00 Δ=10°00'00" 35.78 2 3 .56 Δ =9 0 ° 0 0'00" R =15.00 R = 1 5 . 0 0 Δ =90°0 0 ' 0 0 " 23. 5 6 N89°22'57"E 11.02 R =2 4 5.0 0 Δ=56°00'00"239.46 R = 2 0 0 . 0 0 Δ = 9 7°2 2'5 7 " 3 3 9.93 Δ = 9 7 ° 2 2 ' 5 7 " 2 7 1.9 4 Δ =56°00'00"278.55 4 0 40 Δ =3 5°39'20"177.36 Δ =3 5°39'20"152.4785.63 N82°00 ' 0 0 " E 85.63 Δ = 6 7° 4 4'17" 236.45 Δ = 2 9 ° 3 8 ' 4 0 " 1 0 3 . 4 8 92 . 3 2 N 0 0 ° 0 2 ' 3 3 " W 108.21 N89°57'27"E 114.08 N89°57'27"E 13 3 . 0 2 N 2 0 ° 1 4 ' 5 7 " E 23 . 0 2 11 0 . 0 0 S69 ° 4 5 ' 0 3 " E 53.0 0 S76°1 1 ' 3 0 " E 55.03 N0 ° 0 2 ' 3 3 " W 10 6 . 8 3 N0 ° 0 2 ' 3 3 " W 11 0 . 0 0 N1 0 ° 0 3 ' 2 7 " E 11 1 . 7 3 N2 0 ° 1 4 ' 5 7 " E 11 0 . 0 0 50.00 58.21 58.01 56.07 75.6658.01 58.2144.69 2 0 11.52 25.17 4.2 1 13.07 11 0 . 0 0 N 0 0 ° 0 2 ' 3 3 " W 10 6 . 8 3 N 0 0 ° 0 2 ' 3 3 " W 40 . 0 0 S2 7 ° 3 9 ' 2 0 " W 67 . 1 5 N 6 0 ° 2 1 ' 5 0 " W 67 . 1 5 Δ = 3 8 ° 3 0 ' 2 9 " 2 2 8 . 5 1 4 5.12 Δ = 7°3 6'15" OU T L O T K Dr a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y E a s e m e n t ov e r a l l o f O U T L O T K OUTLOT K Drainage and Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT K 110.00 N89°22'57"E 24 2 . 0 0 S 0 0 ° 3 7 ' 0 3 " E 110.00 S89°22'57"W 24 2 . 0 0 N 0 0 ° 3 7 ' 0 3 " W 113.56 S89°39'16"W 110.00 S89°22'57"W 31 7 . 2 2 N 0 0 ° 3 7 ' 0 3 " W 34 0 . 1 1 S 0 0 ° 3 7 ' 0 3 " E 9 6 . 9 5 S 2 6 ° 2 5 ' 2 7 " E N 3 0 ° 1 1 ' 1 5 " W 4 6 . 9 7 N89°22'57"E 110.00 N89°22'57"E 110.00 N89°22'57"E 110.00 N89°22'57"E 110.00 N89°22'57"E 110.00 N89°22'57"E 110.00 N89°22'57"E 110.00 N77°37'37 " E 112.36 OUTLOT H OUTLOT L Drainage and Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT L OUTLOT L Drainage and Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT L OU T L O T K Dr a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y E a s e m e n t ov e r a l l o f O U T L O T K S74° 3 0 ' 5 3 " E 74.71 WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA NORTH 0 50 100 INSET A WET LAND OUTLOT K 7 Drainage and Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT K WET LAND 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 927.83 51 0 . 9 5 1 2 1 . 9 7 N 4 3 ° 4 3 ' 0 5 " W 1 2 4 . 6 5 N 2 6 ° 2 9 ' 3 2 " W 9 0 . 8 6 S 5 0 ° 1 7 ' 0 8 " E 1 0 5 . 7 0 N 5 4 ° 3 8 ' 3 1 " W 1 0 3 . 8 4 N 5 4 ° 5 3 ' 2 6 " W 99 . 0 9 S 3 5 ° 0 6 ' 3 4 " W S3 5 ° 0 6 ' 3 4 " W 99 . 0 9 5 5 . 7 0 5 0 . 0 0 95.79 S 7 8 ° 5 1 ' 3 4 " E 112.45 S81°2 5 ' 3 5 " W 112.59 N83°11'0 4 " E 111.19 S81°2 5 ' 3 5 " W 106.15 S83°00' 2 6 " W 94 . 9 5 N 6 0 ° 2 8 ' 3 2 " W 82 . 8 7 S 6 0 ° 2 8 ' 3 2 " E 9 2 . 0 0 N 4 3 ° 4 3 ' 0 5 " W 81. 6 0 64. 5 5 S 6 8 ° 3 6 ' 5 7 " E 9 7 . 6 8 S 0 8 ° 3 4 ' 2 5 " E 49.71 62.87 62.45 50.00 50.00 61.19 61.13 45.02 50 . 8 7 44 . 0 7 1 2 . 4 5 42 . 0 0 40 . 8 7 22.6 9 41. 8 6 37.82 S22°11'43"W 96 . 5 0 S 0 0 ° 3 6 ' 5 8 " W 13 6 . 6 8 S 0 0 ° 3 6 ' 5 8 " W 94.00 S89°23'02"E 10 1 . 5 1 S 0 0 ° 3 6 ' 5 8 " W 96 . 5 0 S 0 0 ° 3 6 ' 5 8 " W 45 . 0 0 51 . 5 0 54 . 5 1 47 . 0 0 47 . 0 0 54 . 5 1 51 . 5 0 45 . 0 0 20.2720.27 114.27 S89°23'02"E 73.73 S 8 ° 3 4 ' 2 5 " E 9 7 . 6 8 S 7 ° 5 0 ' 1 1 " E 9 7 . 6 8 S 6 ° 4 8 ' 5 6 " E 9 7 . 4 8 N2 1 ° 2 3 ' 0 3 " E 88 . 0 0 S2 9 ° 3 1 ' 2 8 " W 90 . 3 3 S46 ° 1 6 ' 5 5 " W 96. 6 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 9 . 5 2 4 2 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 98. 1 7 S 3 6 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " W 10. 8 7 87. 3 0 OUTLOT G OU T L O T F OUTLOT J 40 R = 2 0 0 . 0 0 Δ = 9 7°22'57"339.93 239.46 R=245.00 Δ=56°0 0'0 0 " 85.63 N82°00 ' 0 0 " E 40 40 199.24 13 9 . 7 0 N 0 0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 14 0 . 1 3 R =4 5 .0 0 Δ =270°11'5 4 " 2 1 2 . 2 1 R = 4 0 . 0 0 Δ = 4 5 ° 0 5 ' 5 7 " 3 1 . 4 9 R=40.00 Δ =45°05'5 7 " 31.49 40.00 107.91 WET LAND Drainage and Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT G 8 14 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 12 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 OUTLOT I OUTLOT K Drainage and Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT I Drainage and Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT J Drainage and Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT K 35 . 1 7 23.7 2 138 . 0 9 N 5 2 ° 0 4 ' 4 8 " E 113.56 S89°39'16"W 135 . 4 3 N 3 7 ° 4 5 ' 2 7 " E 60 . 0 0 S 0 0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 63. 0 6 N 4 6 ° 2 1 ' 2 7 " E 7 2 . 4 2 N 1 6 ° 1 0 ' 0 8 " W N 4 7 ° 4 6 ' 0 5 " W 4 7 . 0 1 N44 ° 5 4 ' 0 3 " E 45. 0 0 S 4 4 ° 5 4 ' 0 3 " E 4 5 . 0 0 Δ =187°20'3 0" 1 4 7 . 1 4 Δ = 8 2 ° 5 1 ' 2 3" 65.0 8 Δ = 6 7°44'17"236.45 Δ =35°39'20"152.47 Δ =2 0°2 0'4 0 " 8 6 . 9 9 S2 7 ° 3 9 ' 2 0 " W 40 . 0 0 13 3 . 0 2 N 2 0 ° 1 4 ' 5 7 " E 132 . 5 4 S 4 8 ° 5 7 ' 1 2 " W 68.48 N88°23'13"E Δ =5 6°0 0'0 0 " 2 7 8 . 5 5 Δ = 2 0°2 0'4 0 " 1 0 1. 2 0 S 4 2 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 5 7 . 4 2 5 7 . 4 2 R = 2 0 0.0 0 Δ =39°00'00"136.14 R =11 6 .0 0 Δ =1 2 0 °2 3 '2 6 "2 4 3.7 4 R = 2 6 0 . 0 0 Δ = 5 6 ° 3 3 ' 3 6 " 2 5 6 . 6 6 Δ = 3 9°00'00"108.91 Δ =1 2 0 °2 3 '2 6 "15 9.69 Δ = 5 6 ° 3 3 ' 3 6 " 2 9 6 . 1 5 66.12 R=200.00Δ=17°35'12"61.39 Δ=17°35'12"49.11 S81°00'00 " E 66.12 N 3 ° 4 8 ' 1 4 " W 5 8 . 5 0 5 8 . 5 0 OUTLOT H 40 40 40 N6 0 ° 2 1 ' 5 0 " W 67 . 1 5 Δ = 7°3 6'15" 4 5.12 R = 3 4 0.00 Δ = 4 6°0 6'44" 2 7 3.6 4 15. 0 0 96. 6 0 N 4 6 ° 1 6 ' 5 5 " E S79°06' 0 9 " E 67.21 N63°5 2 ' 1 6 " E 56.79 S 3 3 ° 3 5 ' 0 4 " E 4 4 . 4 9 94.16 S 6 6 ° 5 1 ' 1 3 " W 8 4 . 0 0 N 2 6 ° 2 9 ' 3 2 " W 96.2 5 N 6 8 ° 5 0 ' 1 3 " W 8 8 . 2 3 N 5 3 ° 3 8 ' 5 7 " W 138.84 S 7 9 ° 0 4 ' 2 6 " E 105. 0 0 S 5 7 ° 3 7 ' 5 4 " W 1 7 0 . 3 4 S 3 2 ° 2 2 ' 0 6 " E 123 . 5 5 N 3 7 ° 3 1 ' 4 0 " E 105. 0 0 S 5 7 ° 3 7 ' 5 4 " W S63°3 0 ' 2 8 " W 94.00 S2 1 ° 0 9 ' 4 7 " W 10 8 . 0 0 S 3 2 ° 2 2 ' 0 6 " E 1 0 5 . 3 4 100 . 3 6 N 4 3 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 99 . 2 1 N 0 3 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 4 7 . 5 0 7 7 . 1 6 77.28 61.56 50.0 0 55.0 0 6 5 . 0 0 1 0 5 . 3 4 1 5 6 . 6 7 S 2 0 ° 3 5 ' 4 7 " E 110.00 N86°11'46"E 1 0 0 . 6 6 S 0 3 ° 4 8 ' 1 4 " E 1 8 2 . 9 4 S 1 2 ° 0 2 ' 0 5 " E 1 1 8 . 8 6 S 3 1 ° 5 6 ' 1 0 " E 1 0 5 . 8 3 S 5 4 ° 0 1 ' 5 2 " E 1 0 0 . 5 2 S 5 4 ° 0 1 ' 5 2 " E 1 0 3 . 1 3 S 3 1 ° 5 6 ' 1 0 " E 1 1 2 . 7 6 S 1 2 ° 0 2 ' 0 5 " E 1 0 0 . 6 6 S 0 3 ° 4 8 ' 1 4 " E N35 ° 5 8 ' 0 8 " E 114 . 5 0 N39 ° 3 7 ' 1 3 " E 114 . 7 3 N58° 0 3 ' 5 0 " E 108. 8 4 N64°0 0 ' 0 0 " E 98.24 N77°57'55 " E 95.34 N86°11'46"E 110.00 96.33 N86°11'46"E 110.00 N86°11'46"E 119 . 3 9 N 3 6 ° 5 8 ' 0 8 " E S2 1 ° 1 9 ' 5 8 " W 16 . 0 0 S2 9 ° 3 8 ' 1 0 " W 40 . 0 0 4 . 8 8 5 3 . 5 1 4 7 . 0 2 5 4 . 3 2 5 1 . 5 1 4 9 . 6 7 5 3 . 4 6 3 2 . 6 8 3 2 . 9 0 8 5 . 9 6 7 1 . 5 5 7 8 . 7 1 5 5 . 0 0 5 7 . 7 6 27.67 41.34 4 5 . 0 0 5 5 . 6 6 5 5 . 6 6 4 5 . 0 0 4 2 . 0 0 4 2 . 0 0 8.9 1 91. 4 5 51.1 3 45.1 2 55.0 0 50.0 021 . 8 0 77 . 4 1 114 . 5 2 114 . 3 7 S 3 7 ° 5 3 ' 0 4 " E 6 1 . 7 5 5 0 . 0 0 5 3 . 8 4 94.00 S89°23'02"E 94.00 S89°23'02"E S89°23'02"E 94.00 S89°23'02"E 94.00 WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA NORTH 0 50 100 INSET B CI R C L E 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 8 247 . 5 7 N 5 2 ° 0 2 ' 2 2 " E 136. 2 8 S 7 0 ° 3 0 ' 3 1 " E 1 6 1 . 8 7 N 5 3 ° 4 8 ' 4 0 " W 14 5 . 5 9 N 0 0 ° 3 6 ' 5 8 " E 421.17 S89°23'02"E S 5 3 ° 4 8 ' 4 0 " E 8 2 . 3 4 N3 5 ° 4 0 ' 0 0 " E 137 . 0 8 S85°57'38"W 290.65 N 4 6 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " W 1 5 1 . 6 4 N0 2 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 15 8 . 6 4 N2 3 ° 5 1 ' 0 4 " E 18 8 . 2 2 N1 6 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 19 4 . 6 2 N35 ° 4 0 ' 0 0 " E 181 . 9 0 R=227.00 Δ=35°34'21"140.93 Δ=31°33'53"138.83 Δ =15°26'02" 5 4.41 Δ=20°08'19" 71.00 73.67 66.87 8 4 . 8 3 7 7 . 0 4 8 2 . 7 8 6 7 . 7 9 20 20 1 0 20 1 0 1 0 1 0 10 10 10 10 94. 4 9 2 9 . 7 9 Δ= 0 4 ° 0 0 ' 2 8 " 17 . 6 3 Δ=24°02'5 1" 25.18 Δ = 5 0 ° 1 7 ' 3 8 " 5 2 . 6 7 Δ =48°02'22" 50.31 Δ =4 8 °0 0 '0 0 "5 0 .2 7 Δ = 8 7°09'21" 9 1.27 1 2 . 0 9 R=2 8 . 0 0 Δ= 5 2 ° 5 8 ' 0 2 " 25. 8 8 Δ= 2 8 ° 2 3 ' 5 1 " 29. 7 4 S 1 6 ° 4 6 ' 4 2 " E 6 0 . 0 0 S89°09'21"W 60.00 R =6 0 .0 0 Δ =2 8 5°56'04" 2 9 9 . 4 312.09 25.88 Δ=52°58'02" R=28.00 Drainage and Utility Easement 25 25 25 25 25 25 456.82 S89°23'02"E 76.0076.0076.0094.5025.0025.0084.32 142 . 3 2 2 1 . 3 1 59 . 0 1 75 . 0 0 80 . 0 0 61 . 4 6 32 . 5 1 90 . 6 8 90 . 0 0 199.30130.00 163 . 6 3 S 4 2 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " W 13 4 . 0 1 N 0 0 ° 3 6 ' 5 8 " E 7 6 . 9 8 S 1 2 ° 2 3 ' 4 7 " E 8 9 . 8 7 S 3 2 ° 4 9 ' 0 7 " E 118.13 S89°23'02"E 144. 9 0 S 7 1 ° 2 8 ' 0 5 " E 14 1 . 4 6 N 1 8 ° 3 1 ' 5 5 " E 21 3 . 1 9 N 0 0 ° 3 6 ' 5 8 " E R=403.00 Δ=24°23'02" 171.51 33 1 . 7 8 S 0 0 ° 3 6 ' 5 8 " W 12 2 . 3 8 20 9 . 4 1 75 . 0 0 75 . 0 0 75 . 0 0 10 6 . 7 8 Δ=11°26 ' 39 " 75.50 Δ=12°56'23" 85.37 S89°23'02"E 175.16 S89°23'02"E 192.49 S89°23'02"E 192.49 S89°23'02"E 178.41 20 20 10 10 1 0 1 0 LEAPING DEER 1 2 3 4 1 5 4 3 2 1 6 1 2 3 4 3 94.50 76.00 76.00 76.00 18 4 . 4 1 N 0 0 ° 3 6 ' 5 8 " E 18 4 . 4 1 N0 0 ° 3 6 ' 5 8 " E 18 4 . 4 1 N0 0 ° 3 6 ' 5 8 " E 18 4 . 4 1 N0 0 ° 3 6 ' 5 8 " E 18 4 . 4 1 50. 0 0 N6 5 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " W 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 N71° 2 8 ' 0 5 " W 138. 5 7 S80°53'35 " E 136.18 S89°23'02"E 130.00 Δ=06°28'06" 48.32 Δ=09°25'30" 70.40 Δ =08°2 9 ' 2 6 " 63.4 3 31.99 S25°00'00"W 7. 3 8 90 . 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 20 20 20 25 HI L L S I D E D R I V E 4 5 . 9 4 20 20 20 15 15 175.1 3 N 6 5 ° 5 4 ' 2 4 " E 261 . 7 4 N 4 9 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 1 3 8 . 3 7 S 4 1 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E N63°3 0 ' 0 0 " E 75.67 2 0 6 . 5 9 N 4 7 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " W N 5 2 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " W 5 4 . 2 8 10101 0 1 0 7 7 . 8 7 30.2 7 7 . 7 4 10 10 10 WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA NORTH 0 50 100 INSET C Δ =0 5 °2 6 ' 0 3 " 5 3 .8 7 S6 5 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 24 . 8 3 8 1 2 3 4 5 4 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 7 9 10 5 BR O O K V I E W C O U R T DR I V E HIL L S I D E 6 25 . 0 0 25 . 0 0 70.48 90.31 160.79 160.79 N89°39'16"E 32 2 . 3 3 N 2 5 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 93 . 2 3 22 9 . 1 1 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 R =5 9 3.0 0 Δ =2 4°1 4'5 0" 2 5 0.95 R =2 5 3 .0 0 Δ =4 0 °2 4 '2 6 "1 7 8 .4 3 N49 ° 1 4 ' 5 0 " E 63.5 0 1 4 1 . 0 5 S 2 0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 117.07 N86°56'28"E 110.56 N 7 0 ° 3 2 ' 2 9 " E 108. 2 5 N 5 6 ° 1 5 ' 5 4 " E 94.6 5 N 4 8 ° 4 4 ' 3 8 " E 107 . 0 3 N 4 2 ° 2 7 ' 3 0 " E 10 7 . 1 2 N 3 4 ° 1 6 ' 1 8 " E 10 0 . 2 1 N 2 6 ° 4 4 ' 5 7 " E 17 6 . 6 7 N 2 5 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 132 . 0 0 S 6 5 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E S 1 0 ° 4 2 ' 1 0 " E 1 3 4 . 0 0 S 2 6 ° 0 9 ' 3 7 " E 1 3 2 . 0 0 S 4 0 ° 4 5 ' 1 0 " E 1 3 2 . 0 0 S 4 3 ° 2 7 ' 0 0 " E 1 3 2 . 0 0 S 5 1 ° 3 8 ' 0 0 " E 1 3 2 . 0 0 S5 9 ° 4 9 ' 2 5 " E 13 2 . 0 0 S6 5 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 13 2 . 0 0 S6 5 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 13 2 . 0 0 88 . 3 3 88 . 3 3 Δ =1 5 °2 7 '2 7 "7 5 .0 0 Δ =10 °2 1'2 6 " 5 0 .2 5 Δ =1 4 °3 5 '3 4 " 7 0 .8 0 29.09 Δ=2°41'50" Δ =8 °1 1'0 0 " 8 8 .2 7 Δ =8°11'2 5" 8 8.3 4 Δ=5°10'35" 55.83 32 . 5 0 88 . 3 3 88 . 3 3 4. 2 0 59.3 0 15 15 15 15 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 101 0 1 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 0 1 0 1 0 10 S6 5 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 50. 0 0 S 4 8 ° 1 4 ' 4 3 " E 4 2 . 0 3 1 4 2 . 2 5 S 3 8 ° 3 1 ' 0 1 " E 52. 9 8 S 6 2 ° 4 1 ' 2 1 " E 103.84 N7 8 ° 0 2 ' 3 0 " E 86. 8 9 N 3 7 ° 4 9 ' 1 0 " E 72 . 5 3 N 1 8 ° 2 6 ' 5 3 " E 84 . 9 8 N 5 ° 5 5 ' 1 3 " E 8 7 . 7 5 S 5 ° 0 5 ' 5 2 " E 1 0 8 . 8 9 S 5 2 ° 3 4 ' 2 5 " E N39 ° 0 6 ' 1 6 " E 57. 4 5 68.0 8 N 4 7 ° 3 4 ' 0 2 " E 64.6 3 S 5 2 ° 2 5 ' 0 9 " W 1 2 4 . 0 0 S 2 5 ° 4 1 ' 0 1 " E 27.57 S69°31'49"E 128. 8 4 S 6 9 ° 3 1 ' 4 9 " E 65.1 4 91.2 6 6 9 . 8 6 3 9 . 0 3 4 7 . 4 3 9 4 . 8 3 S2 5 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " W 13 4 . 9 2 N2 ° 1 6 ' 1 1 " E 17 4 . 1 3 N 4 5 ° 1 9 ' 3 7 " W 1 4 4 . 5 2 S86°54'44"W 117.41 S39 ° 1 6 ' 5 1 " W 120 . 0 0 N2 5 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 15 0 . 0 0 S 4 6 ° 1 1 ' 1 4 " E 1 2 4 . 0 0 S 4 0 ° 4 5 ' 1 0 " E 1 2 4 . 0 0 68 . 2 3 Δ =07°49'12" 77.52 Δ =1 0 °5 9'3 4 "1 0 8.9 8 Δ =1 5 °0 4 '0 9 " 5 9 .9 7 Δ =2 5 °2 0 '1 7 "1 0 0 .8 3 37.5 0 26.0 0 20 4 . 1 1 83. 7 8 83. 7 8 Δ=66°30'3 6 " 69.65 Δ = 4 7 ° 4 4 ' 4 7 " 5 0 . 0 0 Δ =47°44'4 7" 50.00 Δ =4 7 °4 4 '4 7 " 5 0 .0 0 Δ=74°5 4'3 8 " 78.4 5 R=30.00 Δ=52°19'48" 27.40 R = 6 0 . 0 0 Δ =284°3 9'3 7 "2 9 8 .1 0 R= 3 0 . 0 0 Δ= 2 4 ° 3 4 ' 3 8 " 12 . 8 7 R=30.0 0 Δ=27° 4 5 ' 1 0 " 14.53 90 . 7 9 11 3 . 1 6 N0 ° 2 0 ' 4 4 " W 50 . 0 0 N77°19'4 8 " E 60.00 6 0 . 0 0 N 2 7 ° 1 9 ' 4 8 " W 180 . 0 2 N 6 5 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " W 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 2 5 2 5 WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA NORTH 0 50 100 INSET D ))))))) )))))))>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> ST M S T M S T M STM S T M STMSTM ST M STM S T M IP CHKIP CHK CABX HH INV=988.56 INV CMP 15 TO STMH INV=990.15 FES 15 RCP INV=990.82 FES 15 RCP OE OE OE OE >> >> OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE >> 3333 WE T L A N D 1 d WE T L A N D 1 b >> >> INV=990.47 FES 15 IN PVC INV=990.09 FES RCP 15 IN RE=992.02 STMH ST-1 EL=990.6 ST-2 EL=990.4 ST-3 EL=987.4 ST-4 EL=983.8 ST-5 EL=982.2 ST-17 EL=982.1 ST-18 EL=982.9 ST-19 EL=983.8 0+00 1+00 2+00 0+ 0 0 1+ 0 0 2+ 0 0 3+ 0 0 4 + 0 0 5+0 0 6+00 7+00 8+00 1 6 + 0 0 1 7 + 0 0 18+ 0 0 19 + 0 0 2 0 + 0 0 2 1 + 0 0 2 2 + 0 0 2 3 + 0 0 2 4 + 0 0 25+0026+0027+0028+00 29+ 0 0 30 + 0 0 31 + 0 0 31 + 1 7 . 8 7 BTM = 973.00 NWL = 982.00 HWL = 984.19 100 YR B-B = 984.96 IRRIGATION POND (1P) WETLAND 1b HWL = 981.57 35' 35' 35' 35' 1 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 34 56 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 9 OUTLOT J OUTLOT H OUTLOT H OUTLOT I OUTLOT K OUTLOT K OUTLOT K OUTLOT L OUTLOT L 8 9 10 11 12 9 8 7 6 5 4 2 3 4 3 5 ' WETLAND 1d-2 HWL = 982.55 INV=982.00 INV=982.00 INV=982.00 INV=981.70 INV=982.00 C7.1 3,4&9 INLET PROTECTION ENKAMAT (TYP) C7.1 7 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET C7.1 10 SILT FENCE HEAVY DUTY C7.1 5 SILT FENCE C7.1 5 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE C7.1 10 SILT FENCE HEAVY DUTY C7.1 3,4&9 INLET PROTECTION C7.1 7 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET BORROW AREA 3 C7.1 5 SILT FENCE 5 55 MH 20 MH 19 MH 16 MH 15 MH 14 MH 13 MH 12 MH 11 MH 6 MH 5 MH 17 MH 18 CB 103B STMH 103 CB 102A STMH 102 CB 102B CB 101A CBMH 101 STMH 100A CB 601A CBMH 601 CB 501A CBMH 501 CBMH 502 CBMH 503 CBMH 504 CB 504A CB 202B CBMH 202A CBMH 201 OCS 1 FES 100 FES 600 FES 500 FES 1 FES 200 FES 103A INV: 988.30 INV=981.70 H.P. 93.49 %6.7 % 5. 3 % 4. 7 % 3.8 % 5.0 H.P. 94.28 %5.4 %4.2 %3.6 %4.8 %6.8 %8.0 %7.6 %5.6 %3.2 %2.6 % 6.4 % 7.0 %8.0 %9.0 H . P . 9 8 . 1 8 H . P . L. P . 95. 6 0 9 6 . 1 3 L . P . 9 5 . 9 9 L.P. 93.41 %7.7 %6.7 %7.3 %8.2 %7.6 %6.8 % 7. 8 % 7. 1 %8.7 % 6.1 % 6.7 %5.7 %6.7 %7.7 %6.8 %3.3 %3.5 % 5.1 % 4.7 %3.5 %3.8 %4.2 %6.0 %6.7 %5.5 %5.9 %5.9 %5.1 % 6.5 H.P. 93.37 EX.CL992.75 %7.8 %2.85%1.2 % 1. 0 %1.4 % 1. 6 6 G. B . %6.7 %4.1 % 1. 0 % 1. 0 %1.0 % 1 . 0 % 1. 3 % 1 . 0 % 1 . 0 %1.75 L.P. 91.73 L.P. 91.60 H.P . 94. 9 0 9 7 . 3 7 H . P . % 8.0 6:1Slope in buffe r 6:1 MAX 6:1Slope in buffer % 1 . 4 VMA TW=998.0 BW=996.5 TW=998.0 BW=997.0 97 0 96 0 9 5 0 950 970 960 9 7 0 9 6 0 9 5 0 97 0 96 0 %6.2 8 5 . 5 95.5 94.0 994.6 96.3 95.3 94.8 87.5 87.5 86.0 86.0 94.0 86.0 86.0 94.0 986.5 86.5 94.5 86.5 86.5 86.5 86.5 94.6 93.0 94.8 94.3 94.2 93.5 89.5 94.5 86.5 86.5 94.5 86.5 86.5 95.0 95.5 89.0 89.0 96.8 89.3 89.3 97.5 89.8 89.8 97.5 90.6 90.697.5 91.1 91.1 97.5 91.6 91.6 90.3 90.3 98.3 90.5 90.5 97.9 91.3 91.3 98.392.0 92.0 99.0 92.5 92.5 96.4 98.5 96.5 93.0 93.2 93.0 97.3 96.5 95.0 93.8 94.0 94.8 94.8 94.8 D R O P 1 C D R O P 1 C D R O P 2 C D R O P 2 C D R O P 2 C E O F E O F EO F EO F HWL HWL H W L HWL H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L HW L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L HWLHWLHWLHWL HWLHWL HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HWL HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L H W L H W L HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L HWL HWL H W LHWL HWL HWLHWL HWL HW L HW L HW L HWL HW L HWL H W L HWL HW L HW L HWL HWL HW L HW L H W L H W L HW L HW L H W L H W L GF = 9 9 5 . 0 98 7 . 5 FB W O 98 7 . 0 GF = 9 9 4 . 7 98 7 . 2 FB W O 98 6 . 7 GF = 9 9 5 . 0 98 7 . 5 FB W O 98 7 . 0 GF = 9 9 6 . 0 98 8 . 5 FB W O 98 8 . 0 G F = 9 9 8 . 8 9 9 2 . 7 F B W O 9 9 2 . 5 G F = 1 0 0 0 . 7 9 9 3 . 2 F B W O 9 9 2 . 7 G F = 9 9 8 . 8 9 9 1 . 3 F B W O 9 9 0 . 8 G F = 9 9 5 . 0 9 8 7 . 5 F B L O 9 9 0 . 0 G F = 9 9 8 . 4 9 9 2 . 3 F B W O 9 9 1 . 8 G F = 9 9 9 . 0 9 9 1 . 5 F B W O 9 9 1 . 0 GF = 9 9 4 . 7 98 7 . 2 FB W O 98 6 . 7 G F = 1 0 0 0 . 1 9 9 2 . 6 F B W O 9 9 2 . 1 GF = 9 9 7 . 0 99 7 . 5 SO G 99 6 . 8 GF = 9 9 5 . 5 99 6 . 0 SO G 99 5 . 3 G F = 9 9 7 . 8 99 0 . 3 F B W O 98 9 . 8 G F = 9 9 8 . 4 9 9 1 . 6 F B W O 9 9 1 . 1 G F = 9 9 8 . 3 9 9 0 . 8 F B W O 9 9 0 . 3 G F = 9 9 7 . 5 9 9 0 . 0 F B W O 9 8 9 . 5 G F = 9 9 7 . 1 9 8 9 . 6 F B W O 9 8 9 . 1 G F = 9 9 5 . 5 9 8 8 . 7 F B W O 9 8 8 . 2 GF = 9 9 4 . 5 99 5 . 0 SO G 99 4 . 3 GF = 9 9 5 . 5 99 6 . 0 SO G 99 5 . 3 GF = 9 9 5 . 0 98 7 . 5 FB 99 4 . 8 GF=995.0 987.5 FBWO 987.0 G F = 9 9 8 . 2 9 9 2 . 1 F B W O 9 9 1 . 6 GF= 9 9 5 . 0 987. 5 FB W O 987. 0GF=995.0 987.5 FBWO 987.0 GF = 9 9 6 . 0 99 6 . 5 SO G 99 5 . 8 GF = 9 9 8 . 0 99 5 . 5 SO G 99 7 . 8 GF = 9 9 5 . 3 99 5 . 8 SO G 99 5 . 1 GF = 9 9 5 . 5 99 6 . 0 SO G 99 5 . 3 92.97 GUTTER GUTTER 92.81 EOF EOF EOF EO F 92.0 996 9 9 0 9 9 0 998 992 9 8 8 9 8 8 9 9 2 9 9 8 EOF 98 4 99 4 990 996 9 9 6 9 9 6 990 994 986 994 992 994 996 994 99 8 99 6 99 2 9 9 4 9 9 6 9 9 4 99 6 99 4 99 6 992 992 9 9 2 9 9 0 984 984 9 8 4 9 8 6 98 4 99 4 994 996 990 9 8 6 998 986 986 9 9 0 996 982 9 8 4 9 9 2 990 9 9 4 99 4 9 8 8 9 8 4 9 9 2 9 9 2 994 994 990 9 8 6 99 4 98 6 9 9 4 99 4 9 9 4 994 9 9 0 986 994 9 9 4 9 9 2 9 8 6 990 994 99 4 99 0 99 2 99 4 99 2 99 4 99 2 9 9 2 99 4 99 6 9 9 2 99 4 992 9 9 6 996 9 8 3 981 980 978 976 974973 9 8 4 9 8 0 97 4 9 8 0 97 6 97 3 973 974 978 981 9 8 4 9 7 3 9 7 4 9 7 8 98 1 9 8 3 98 6 994 992 9 9 0 988 9 8 6 9 8 4 982 99 4 99 0 986 9 8 2 98 2 982 982 98 6 98 8 992 9 9 0 99 2 996 996 99 4 99 4 994 NORTH 0 50 100 CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #1 DATED 09.14.21 REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #2 DATED 12.09.21 CNC RCH RCH 2021-08-16 2021-11-08 2022-02-02 PROJECT NO. FILE NAME LA N D F O R M c IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. PROJECT CERTIFICATION 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 Web: landform.net Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY DEVELOPER MUNICIPALITY WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA-NORTH MEDINA, MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 02.02.2022 MEH17003 20 2 2 MARK SMITH 2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 TEL (612) 490-0558 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request. Randall C. Hedlund License No:Date: C301MEH003.dwg GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL C3.1 3 1.Top nut hydrant, 725 feet ± from the centerlines intersection of the westbound lane of trunk highway no. 55 and Mohawk Drive. West side of Mowhawk Drive. Elevation = 998.180 2.Top nut hydrant, northeast quadrant of the intersection of Chippawa road and Hackamore Drive. Elevation = 1007.372 BENCHMARK SYMBOL DESCRIPTION LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 910 908 :MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED) :MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED) :MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING) :MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING) :Pavement Sawcut :Construction Limits ESTIMATED QUANTITY FOR ENTIRE PROJECT Contact utility service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning grading. Geotechnical report has not yet been received, it will be provided once obtained. Remove topsoil from grading areas and stockpile sufficient quantity for reuse. Materials may be mined from landscape areas for use on site and replaced with excess organic material with prior Owner approval. Remove surface and ground water from excavations. Provide initial lifts of stable foundation material if exposed soils are wet and unstable. Rough grade Building Pad to 12 Inches below Finished Floor Elevation (FFE). Refer to Structural Specifications for earthwork requirements for building pads. An Independent Testing Firm shall verify the removal of organic and unsuitable soils, soil correction, and compaction and provide periodic reports to the Owner. Place and compact fill using lift thicknesses matched to soil type and compaction equipment to obtain specified compaction throughout the lift. Compact cohesive soils in paved areas to 95% of maximum dry density, Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) except the top 3 feet which shall be compacted to 100%. Compact to 98% density where fill depth exceeds 10 feet. The soils shall be within 3% of optimum moisture content. In granular soils all portions of the embankment shall be compacted to not less than 95% of Modified Proctor Density (ASTM D1557). 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Install perimeter sediment controls prior to beginning work and maintain for duration of construction. Remove controls after areas contributing runoff are permanently stabilized and dispose of off site. Install inlet protection: Wimco RD or CG models as appropriate, or approved equal. Maintain protection until project is stabilized. Limit soil disturbance to the grading limits shown. Schedule operations to minimize length of exposure of disturbed areas. Management practices shown are the minimum requirement. Install and maintain additional controls as work proceeds to prevent erosion and control sediment carried by wind or water. Refer to SWPPP Notes on Sheet C3.6 for additional requirements. Contractor shall prevent sediment laden water from entering the filtration / infiltration system until the site is completely stabilized. All exposed soils areas shall be stabilized immediately to limit soil erosion in that portion of the site where construction has temporarily or permanently ceased. See Landscape Sheets for permanent turf and landscape establishment. Scrape adjacent streets clean daily and sweep clean weekly. Seed, Sod, Mulch and Fertilizer shall meet the following Specifications, as modified. Item Specification Number Sod MNDOT 3878 Seed MNDOT 3876 MN TYPE 22-111 @ 30.5 LB/AC - Temporary Erosion Control MN TYPE 25-151 @ 120 LB/AC - Permanent Turf Mulch MNDOT 3882 MNDOT TYPE 1 @ 2 TON/AC Disc Anchored) MNDOT 3881 General placement MNDOT 2575 Erosion Control Blanket MNDOT 3885 MNDOT TYPE 3N 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. GRADING NOTESEROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES 5 Spot Elevations at curblines indicate flowlines unless noted otherwise. See Sheet C4.1 for rim elevations of catch basins. Grades between proposed spot elevations shall be continuous and nonvariable. Spot Elevations shall govern over contour lines. Meet and Match existing curb. Transition as needed. 24. 25. 26. PAVING NOTES GENERAL NOTES For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070. Site is located within the boundaries of the elm creek watershed management commission (ecwmc). Denotes borrow area. After material is removed contractor to bring bottom of pond to elevation shown in pond callout with grading spoil. 1. 2. NO SCALE TYPICAL LOT DETAIL1 NOTES: 1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY. : REAR ELEVATION : BUILDING TYPE : MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION : FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION : DRP 1' DENOTES DISTANCE GARAGE FLOOR IS DROPPED FROM TYPICAL. DRP 1' MAIN STREET BLK 1 5 X 105.0 X 105.0 X 106.5 X 106.5 DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNER ELEVATIONS DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 20' FRONT 10' SIDE 10' REAR UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE DENOTES BUILDING SETBACKS BUILDING TYPES: FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALK OUT FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT FB = FULL BASEMENT DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW 4. 5 % DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPE 108.3 FB 100.0 GF=108.5 HWL :100 YEAR HIGH WATER LINE :Inlet Protection nn :Silt Fence (North 10,430) (South 8,400) (Chippewa 6,670) :Vehicle Tracking Pad 49 Each 3 Each 25,500 Feet :Compost or Bio Log (North 50) (South 300) (Chippewa 450) 800 Feet))))))))))))) :Erosion Control Blanket 12,000 S.Y. :Heavy Duty Silt Fence (North 5,995) (South 5,985) (Chippewa 4,725) 16,705 Feet :Wetland Impact Area :Flood Plain Impact Area :Flood Plain Mitigation Area )) ) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) )))))) ) ))))))) 4 + 0 0 5+0 0 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+ 0 0 1 0 + 0 0 11+00 12+00 13+00 14 + 0 0 15 + 0 0 1 6 + 0 0 1 7 + 0 0 5 BLK 1 CHIPPEWA ROAD MO H A W K D R I V E 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15 + 0 0 15 + 5 0 . 4 8 7+ 0 0 7+ 5 2 . 2 5 POND (23P) BTM = 976.00 NWL = 985.00 HWL = 986.38 POND (9P) BTM = 976.00 NWL = 985.00 HWL = 986.90 POND (5P) BTM = 974.00 NWL = 983.00 HWL = 984.50 WETLAND 1f HWL = 985.07 WETLAND 1e HWL = 983.85 WETLAND 2 HWL = 986.23 WETLAND 1d HWL = 982.49 FOREBAY (13P) BTM = 979.00 35' 35' 3 5 ' 2 5 ' 2 5 ' 35' 50' 50' 50' 25' 35 ' 35 ' 35 ' 35 ' 50 ' 25' 33 ' 25' 35' 38' 2 0 ' WETLAND 1a-North HWL = 979.07 OUTLOT B 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 18 17 16 15 156 4 3 2 1 OUTLOT G OU T L O T F OUTLOT J OUTLOT H OUTLOT K OUTLOT I OUTLOT K 7 OUTLOT L 14 13 5 4 3 3 5 ' WETLAND 1d-2 HWL = 982.55 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > ST M STM STM STM S T M ST M S T M S T M >> >>>> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> CABX W >> OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE >> WE T L A N D 2 33 33 3333 WE T L A N D 1 e WE T L A N D 1 d WL 1e-1 WL 3 WE T L A N D 1f WL 1d - 2 ST-8 EL=986.2 ST-9 EL=981.2 ST-18 EL=982.9 ST-19 EL=983.8 ST-20 EL=982.6 ST-21 EL=982.6 ST-22 EL=985.8 H.P. 91.79 L.P. 90.38 H.P. 93.49 % 4. 6 % 5 . 4 %4.8 % 3 . 3 90.80 L.P. % 5. 3 % 4. 7 % 3.8 % 5.0 % 4.4 % 5.4 L.P.H.P. L.P. H.P. 9 6 . 1 3 %7.9 %5.7 % 7. 8 % 7. 1 %7.2 %7.6 %3.5 %3.8 %4.2 %8.0 % 4.1 % 5.5 % 4.8 % 4.6 % 4 . 1 % 4 . 1 CL CL % 7.8 % 7.7 %5.1 %6.5 L. P . % 5 . 6 %4.8 %6.9 %6.6 L. P . HWLHWLHWLHWLHWLHWL H W L H W L H W L H W L HWL HW L HW L HW L HWL EX.CL 993.17 %1.0 %1.2 % 1. 0 G . B . %1.0 %1.0 % 4 . 0 % 3 . 0 G. B . 94 . 1 7 % 1. 0 GB %1.0 %1.9 %1.0 %0.5 %0.55 % 1. 7 4 89 . 5 4 CL CL % L.P . 92 . 4 0 % 2. 0 %5.3 EOF 87 . 5 E O F L.P. 91.60 H . P . % 1. 5 % 8.0 V M A 6:1 MAX 6:1Slope in buffer %0.5 88.1 88 . 1 88.1 88.1 8 8 . 1 6:1 VMA VM A 92 . 3 8 VMA TW=992.0 BW=988.5 TW=992.0 BW=988.0 89.1 86.5 86.5 94.2 93.5 89.5 89.5 87.9 87.9 85.0 85.0 93.0 85.5 85.5 93.0 94.5 94.5 86.5 86.5 85.5 85.5 91.6 86.4 86.4 87.6 87.6 994.8 88.0 88.0 96.0 88.3 88.3 88.0 88.0 93.5 95.0 987.0 987.0 994.0 986.0 986.0 89.4 89.3 82.9 8 8 . 0 86.5 84.9 8 8 . 5 D R O P 1 C DR O P 2C DR O P 2C D R O P 2 C D R O P 2 C D R O P 2 C D R O P 1 C E O F E O F EOF E O F EO F EO F EOF EO F TW=990.5 BW=988.0 HWL HWL HW L HW L HW L HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HW L HW L H W L H W L H W L H W L HW L HW L HW L HWL HWL HWL HWL H W L H W L H W L HWLHWLHWL H W L HW L HW L HW L H W L HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL H W L H W L HWL HWL HWL H W L H W L H W L HWLHWLHWLHWLHWLHWL HWL HWLHWLHWLHWL HW L HW L HWL HWL H W L HWL H W L H W L HWL H W L HW L HW L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HW L HW L HW L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L HWL HWLHWL HWLHWL HWL HW L HW L HW L H W L HW L HW L HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HW L HW L H W L H W L HWL HWLHWL H W L H W L H W L HW L H W L HW L HW L HW L HWL HWL HW L HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL H W L HW L HWLHWL HWLHWL HWL H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L HWL HWL HWL HWL H W L H W L HWL HW L HW L HWL HWL HWL HWL H W L H W L H W L H W L HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HW L H W L HWL HWL HWL H W L HW L HW L HWL HWL HWL HW L HW L H W L HWLHWLHWL HW L HWL HW L HWLHWLHWLHWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL G F = 9 9 5 . 0 98 8 . 9 F B W O 98 8 . 4 G F = 9 9 2 . 5 9 8 6 . 9 F B W O 9 8 6 . 4 GF = 9 9 6 . 5 989. 0 FB W O 988. 5 GF=9 9 6 . 8 989. 3 FBW O 988. 8 GF = 9 9 4 . 0 98 6 . 5 FB W O 98 6 . 0 G F = 9 9 5 . 4 9 8 8 . 6 F B W O 9 8 8 . 1 GF=994.0 986.5 FBWO 986.0 GF = 9 9 5 . 5 98 8 . 0 FB W O 98 7 . 5 G F = 9 9 5 . 0 9 8 7 . 5 F B L O 9 9 0 . 0 GF=993.5 986.0 FBWO 985.5 GF = 9 9 4 . 5 98 7 . 0 FB W O 98 6 . 5 G F = 9 9 5 . 1 98 9 . 0 FB W O 9 8 8 . 5 G F = 9 9 7 . 1 9 8 9 . 6 F B W O G F = 9 9 5 . 5 9 8 8 . 7 F B W O 9 8 8 . 2 GF=995.0 987.5 FBWO 987.0 GF = 9 9 2 . 8 99 0 . 1 SE W O 98 9 . 6 GF= 9 9 5 . 0 987. 5 FB W O 987. 0GF=995.0 987.5 FBWO 987.0 8 4 . 7 EOF 99 0 9 8 6 9 8 6 988 982 9 8 4 988 992 98 4 99 4 9 8 2 99 6 992 992 9 9 2 9 9 0 98 6 988 984 985 990 990 990 9 8 6 9 8 6 990 990 99 2 99 4 9 8 2 9 9 4 99 0 9 9 2 9 9 2 9 8 6 990 988 986 990 9 9 2 988 994 986 982 99 4 9 8 8 9 8 4 9 9 2 990 9 9 2 994 994 990 99 4 99 0 98 6 990 992 99 0 99 2 99 4 98 8 99 4 994 996 99 4 9 8 4988 985 9 8 8 9 8 8 987 98 6 98 5 987 987 98 6 987 987 992 986 99 6 976 980 98 4 990 983 982 980 978 976 974 984 98 4 9 8 4 984 992 990 98 6 9 8 8 9 9 0 9 8 6 988 9 8 6 9 8 4 982 9 8 8 98 4 99 4 99 0 986 993 994 988 99 4 994 98 8994 9 8 8 984 985 985 992 990 988 986 984 9 9 2 9 8 6 994 99 2 9 8 8 9 8 4 98 6 98 8 982 98 4 98 8 986 994 996996 9 8 8 9 8 8 9 8 8 986 986 994 994 994 988 990 992 992 8 4 . 7 986 C7.1 3,4&5 INLET PROTECTION C7.1 8 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET C7.1 2 SILT FENCE HEAVY DUTY C7.1 1 SILT FENCE ENKAMAT (TYP) C7.1 2 FES EROSION CONTROL (TYP) C7.1 1 TEMPORARY COMPOST BIO LOG ENKAMAT (TYP) C7.1 10 SILT FENCE HEAVY DUTY C7.1 5 SILT FENCE C7.1 3,4&9 INLET PROTECTION C7.1 8 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 5 5 5 MH 3 MH 1 MH 2 MH 4 MH 9 MH 8 MH 7 MH 6 MH 5 MH 17 MH 11 MH 10 NORTH 0 50 100 CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #1 DATED 09.14.21 REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #2 DATED 12.09.21 CNC RCH RCH 2021-08-16 2021-11-08 2022-02-02 PROJECT NO. FILE NAME LA N D F O R M c IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. PROJECT CERTIFICATION 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 Web: landform.net Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY DEVELOPER MUNICIPALITY WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA-NORTH MEDINA, MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 02.02.2022 MEH17003 20 2 2 MARK SMITH 2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 TEL (612) 490-0558 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request. Randall C. Hedlund License No:Date: C302MEH003.dwg GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL C3.2 SYMBOL DESCRIPTION LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 910 908 :MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED) :MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED) :MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING) :MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING) :Pavement Sawcut :Construction Limits ESTIMATED QUANTITY FOR ENTIRE PROJECT Contact utility service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning grading. Geotechnical report has not yet been received, it will be provided once obtained. Remove topsoil from grading areas and stockpile sufficient quantity for reuse. Materials may be mined from landscape areas for use on site and replaced with excess organic material with prior Owner approval. Remove surface and ground water from excavations. Provide initial lifts of stable foundation material if exposed soils are wet and unstable. Rough grade Building Pad to 12 Inches below Finished Floor Elevation (FFE). Refer to Structural Specifications for earthwork requirements for building pads. An Independent Testing Firm shall verify the removal of organic and unsuitable soils, soil correction, and compaction and provide periodic reports to the Owner. Place and compact fill using lift thicknesses matched to soil type and compaction equipment to obtain specified compaction throughout the lift. Compact cohesive soils in paved areas to 95% of maximum dry density, Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) except the top 3 feet which shall be compacted to 100%. Compact to 98% density where fill depth exceeds 10 feet. The soils shall be within 3% of optimum moisture content. In granular soils all portions of the embankment shall be compacted to not less than 95% of Modified Proctor Density (ASTM D1557). 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Install perimeter sediment controls prior to beginning work and maintain for duration of construction. Remove controls after areas contributing runoff are permanently stabilized and dispose of off site. Install inlet protection: Wimco RD or CG models as appropriate, or approved equal. Maintain protection until project is stabilized. Limit soil disturbance to the grading limits shown. Schedule operations to minimize length of exposure of disturbed areas. Management practices shown are the minimum requirement. Install and maintain additional controls as work proceeds to prevent erosion and control sediment carried by wind or water. Refer to SWPPP Notes on Sheet C3.6 for additional requirements. Contractor shall prevent sediment laden water from entering the filtration / infiltration system until the site is completely stabilized. All exposed soils areas shall be stabilized immediately to limit soil erosion in that portion of the site where construction has temporarily or permanently ceased. See Landscape Sheets for permanent turf and landscape establishment. Scrape adjacent streets clean daily and sweep clean weekly. Seed, Sod, Mulch and Fertilizer shall meet the following Specifications, as modified. Item Specification Number Sod MNDOT 3878 Seed MNDOT 3876 MN TYPE 22-111 @ 30.5 LB/AC - Temporary Erosion Control MN TYPE 25-151 @ 120 LB/AC - Permanent Turf Mulch MNDOT 3882 MNDOT TYPE 1 @ 2 TON/AC Disc Anchored) MNDOT 3881 General placement MNDOT 2575 Erosion Control Blanket MNDOT 3885 MNDOT TYPE 3N 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. GRADING NOTESEROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES 5 Spot Elevations at curblines indicate flowlines unless noted otherwise. See Sheet C4.1 for rim elevations of catch basins. Grades between proposed spot elevations shall be continuous and nonvariable. Spot Elevations shall govern over contour lines. Meet and Match existing curb. Transition as needed. 24. 25. 26. PAVING NOTES NO SCALE TYPICAL LOT DETAIL1 NOTES: 1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY. : REAR ELEVATION : BUILDING TYPE : MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION : FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION : DRP 1' DENOTES DISTANCE GARAGE FLOOR IS DROPPED FROM TYPICAL. DRP 1' MAIN STREET BLK 1 5 X 105.0 X 105.0 X 106.5 X 106.5 DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNER ELEVATIONS DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 20' FRONT 10' SIDE 10' REAR UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE DENOTES BUILDING SETBACKS BUILDING TYPES: FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALK OUT FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT FB = FULL BASEMENT DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW 4. 5 % DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPE GF=108.5 100.0 FB 108.3 HWL :100 YEAR HIGH WATER LINE 3 1.Top nut hydrant, 725 feet ± from the centerlines intersection of the westbound lane of trunk highway no. 55 and Mohawk Drive. West side of Mowhawk Drive. Elevation = 998.180 2.Top nut hydrant, northeast quadrant of the intersection of Chippawa road and Hackamore Drive. Elevation = 1007.372 BENCHMARK GENERAL NOTES For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070. Site is located within the boundaries of the elm creek watershed management commission (ecwmc). Denotes borrow area. After material is removed contractor to bring bottom of pond to elevation shown in pond callout with grading spoil. 1. 2. :Inlet Protection nn :Silt Fence (North 10,430) (South 8,400) (Chippewa 6,670) :Vehicle Tracking Pad 49 Each 3 Each 25,500 Feet :Compost or Bio Log (North 50) (South 300) (Chippewa 450) 800 Feet))))))))))))) :Erosion Control Blanket 12,000 S.Y. :Heavy Duty Silt Fence (North 5,995) (South 5,985) (Chippewa 4,725) 16,705 Feet :Wetland Impact Area :Flood Plain Impact Area :Flood Plain Mitigation Area 0+00 1+00 2+00 0+ 0 0 1+ 0 0 2+ 0 0 3+ 0 0 4 + 0 0 5+0 0 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+ 0 0 1 0 + 0 0 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+ 0 0 15 + 0 0 1 6 + 0 0 1 7 + 0 0 18+ 0 0 19 + 0 0 2 0 + 0 0 2 1 + 0 0 2 2 + 0 0 2 3 + 0 0 2 4 + 0 0 25+0026+0027+0028+00 29+ 0 0 30 + 0 0 31 + 0 0 31 + 1 7 . 8 7 2+ 9 2 . 0 4 0+ 0 0 1+ 0 0 2+ 0 0 1 4321 5 BLK 1 4 CHIPPEWA ROAD MO H A W K D R I V E -0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 14 + 0 0 15 + 0 0 15 + 5 0 . 4 8 POND (23P) BTM = 973.00 NWL = 982.00 HWL = 984.19 100 YR B-B = 984.96 IRRIGATION POND (1P) BTM = 976.00 NWL = 985.00 HWL = 986.38 POND (9P) BTM = 976.00 NWL = 985.00 HWL = 986.90 POND (5P) BTM = 974.00 NWL = 983.00 HWL = 984.50 WETLAND 1f HWL = 985.07 POND 3 HWL = 990.80 WETLAND 1e HWL = 983.85 WETLAND 2 HWL = 986.23 WETLAND 1d HWL = 982.49 WETLAND 1c HWL = 981.72 WETLAND 1b1 HWL = 980.57 WETLAND 1b HWL = 981.57 FOREBAY (13P) BTM = 979.00 NWL = 986.00 HWL = 987.66 WETLAND 1a-North HWL = 979.07 OUTLOT B 1 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 34 56 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 9 4 3 2 1 OUTLOT G OU T L O T F OUTLOT J OUTLOT J OUTLOT H OUTLOT H OUTLOT K OUTLOT I OUTLOT I OUTLOT K OUTLOT K OUTLOT K OUTLOT K 7 OUTLOT L OUTLOT L 8 14 9 10 11 12 13 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 3 4 WETLAND 1d-2 HWL = 982.55 LA N E CABX CABX 992.4 G G G G G G G G G G G G OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE > > > > > > > > I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > I I I I 33 33 3333 3333 33 >> 980.6 ST-1 EL=990.6 ST-2 EL=990.4 ST-3 EL=987.4 ST-4 EL=983.8 ST-5 EL=982.2 ST-8 EL=986.2 ST-9 EL=981.2 ST-10 EL=981.7 ST-17EL=982.1 ST-18 EL=982.9 ST-19 EL=983.8 ST-20 EL=982.6 ST-21 EL=982.6 ST-22 EL=985.8 EX. 22" JACKED CASING EX. 12" DIP WATERMAIN W/12" PLUG > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> > > >> > > ST M S T M S T M STM S T M STMSTM ST M STM STM STM S T M ST M S T M S T M ST M SAN S A N SAN SAN SAN SA N S A N S A N SA N S A N S A N S A N SA N SA N S A N S A N SA N SA N SA N SAN SAN >> >>>> > > > > > > SA N > > >> >> >> >> >> SA N 8" W A T . 8" W A T . 8" W A T . >> 12" W A T . 12" W A T . 12 " W A T . 12" W A T . 12 " W A T . 8" WAT.8" W A T . 8 " W A T . 8 " W A T . 8" W A T . 8" W A T . 8 " W A T . 8 " W A T . 8" W A T . 1 2 " W A T . 8" WA T . 8" W A T . 8" W A T . 12" WAT. EX. SAN MH MH 1 MH 2 MH 3 MH 4 MH 5 MH 17 MH 18 MH 19 MH 20 MH 6 MH 7 MH 8 MH 9 MH 10 MH 11 MH 12 MH 13 MH 14 MH 15 MH 16 FES 500 CBMH 501 CB 501A CBMH 502 CBMH 503 CBMH 504 CB 504AOCS 1 FES 1 FES 400 CB 401A CBMH 401 CB 401B FES 305 FES 303 FES 304 FES 302 CBMH 206 CB 206A CBMH 205 CBMH 204 STMH 203 CBMH 202A CBMH 202 CBMH 201 FES 200 CB 903ACBMH 903 OCS 2 FES 2 OCS 3 FES 3 CB 601A CBMH 601 FES 600 FES 100 STMH 100A CB 101A CBMH 101 CB 102B STMH 102 CB 102A CB 103B FES 103A STMH 103 STUB 12" WATER C O N N E C T W I T H C O N S T R U C T I O N O F C H I P P A W A R O A D STMH 901 STMH 902 FES 900 FES 4 OCS 4 CB 202B CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #1 DATED 09.14.21 REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #2 DATED 12.09.21 CNC RCH RCH 2021-08-16 2021-11-08 2022-02-02 PROJECT NO. FILE NAME LA N D F O R M c IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. PROJECT CERTIFICATION 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 Web: landform.net Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY DEVELOPER MUNICIPALITY WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA-NORTH MEDINA, MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 02.02.2022 MEH17003 20 2 2 MARK SMITH 2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 TEL (612) 490-0558 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request. Randall C. Hedlund License No:Date: NORTH 0 100 200 Pipe Materials Watermain 6" DIP Class 52-Hydrant Leads, 8" PVC C900 & 12" PVC C900 -Main Lines (ANSI A21.51/AWWA C151) Water Service 1" Copper Type K (ASTM B88) Curb Stop shall be adjusted to an elevation of 2" below finished grade. See detail SER-01. Sanitary Sewer 8" PVC SDR 35 (ASTM: D3034, D2665, & F891) Sanitary Sewer Service 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 (ASTM: D1785, D3034, D2665, & F891) Storm Sewer RCP 12"-18" CLASS 5 (ASTM C76) RCP 21" CLASS 4 (ASTM C76) RCP 24"-48" CLASS 3 (ASTM C76) Draintile 6" Perforated Polyethylene HDPE (ASTM F667), PVC (ASTM D2729) 1' Behind Curb with a 6"x4" Tee & 4" PVC To Property Line For Home Sump Pump Connection. See C7.4/5. Contact Utility Service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning. Contractor to field verify location and elevation of all utility points of connection prior to construction of any proposed utilities. Contractor to notify Engineer immediately if there is any discrepancy. Contractor to pothole all utility crossings prior to construction of new utilities to verify depths of existing lines. Contact Engineer immediately if any conflicts are discovered. Provide means and measures to protect adjacent property from damage during utility installation. Pipe lengths shown are from center of structure to center of structure or end of end section. Install tracer wire with all non-conductive utilities in accordance with City of Medina Standards. Connect to City Utilities in accordance with City of Medina Standards. Contact Steve Scherer, City of Medina Public Works Department, at 763.473.8842 for Wet Tap inspection. Maintain 7.5 Feet of cover on water. Deflect water to maintain 18-inch minimum outside separation at sewer crossings. Center pipe lengths to provide greatest separation between joints. Contact Steve Scherer, City of Medina Public Works Department, at 763.473.8842 for flushing and pressure test inspections. All joints and connections in the storm sewer system shall be gastight or water tight. Approved resilient rubber joints must be used to make watertight connections to manholes, catch basins, and other structures. Catch basins in curb and gutter are sumped 2 inches below the gutter grade. Refer to Detail STR-03 & STR-04 on Sheet C7.4. Irrigation sleeve to be 4" Schedule 80 PVC buried 24" below grade. Extend sleeves 3' beyond the edge of pavement. Mark each end of sleeve with 3/4" rebar 12" below finish grade. (coordinate with irrigation contractor.) Compact cohesive soils in paved areas to 95% of maximum dry density, Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) except the top 3 feet which shall be compacted to 100%. compact to 98% density where fill depth exceeds 10 feet. The soils shall be within 3% of optimum moisture content. In granular soils all portions of the embankment shall be compacted to not less than 95% of Modified Proctor Density (ASTM D1557). Adjust structures to final grade where disturbed. Comply with requirements of Utility. Meet requirements for traffic loading in paved areas. Reserved Coordinate with private utilities to provide electric, natural gas, and communications services. The City of Medina shall not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that are associated with variations in the utility as-built elevations. All utility connections shall be verified in the field. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The Owner and Engineer of Record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards. All watermain and sanitary sewer testing shall be done in accordance with the City of Medina standards and specifications. Copies of all test results shall be submitted to the City (Public Works Director, City Engineer), the Owner, and the Engineer of Record. Televise sanitary sewer following installation per City guidelines 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. GENERAL NOTES UTILITY NOTES For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1. C400MEH003.dwg UTILITY SCHEMATIC /UTILITY NOTES SERVICES & STORM SCHEDULE C4.0 CB 401A CBMH 401(SUMP) CB 206A CBMH 206 CBMH 205 CBMH 204 STMH 203 CB 202B CBMH 202A CBMH 202 CBMH 201(SUMP) CB 103B STMH 103 CB 102B CB 102A CB 101A CBMH 101(SUMP) STMH 100A 48" 48" R-3067-VB R-1642-B STORM SEWER SCHEDULE CB 401B STMH 102 2'x3' NUMBER DIAM.CASTING CB 903A CBMH 903(SUMP) CB 601A CBMH 601(SUMP) CB 504A CBMH 504 CBMH 503 CBMH 502 CB 501A CBMH 501(SUMP) OCS 1 OCS 2 OCS 3 DETAIL STO-1 48" 2'x3' 2'x3' 48" 27" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" R-3067-VB R-1642-B R-1642-B R-1642-B R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB 2'x3' 2'x3' 2'x3' 2'x3' 2'x3' 2'x3' 2'x3' 48" 48" 2'x3' R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-4342 R-3067-V R-3067-V R-3067-V R-3067-V R-3067-V STO-1 STO-1 STO-1 STO-04 STO-05 STO-5 STO-5 STO-7 STO-4 STO-4 STO-04 STO-05 STO-04 STO-05 STO-04 STO-05 STO-04 STO-4 STO-4 STO-4 STO-5 STO-5 STO-4 STO-4 STO-5 STO-04 STO-05 STO-4 STO-5 GALVANIZED C7.6/1 GALVANIZED GALVANIZED C7.6/2 C7.6/3 FES 2 FES 3 FES 1 FES 100 FES 103A FES 200 FES 302 FES 303 FES 304 FES 305 FES 500 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 21" RCP APRON STO-8 &9 18" RCP APRON 18" RCP APRON 18" RCP APRON 18" RCP APRON STO-8 &9 STO-8 STO-8 STO-8 &9 STO-8 &915" RCP APRON 12" RCP APRON STO-8 &9 FES 600 NA STO-8 &915" RCP APRON 21" RCP APRON STO-8 &9 15" RCP APRON STO-8 STO-8 &915" RCP APRON 18" RCP APRON STO-8 &9 SERVICES SCHEDULE (NORTH) 1.TOP NUT HYDRANT, 725 FEET ± FROM THE CENTERLINES INTERSECTION OF THE WESTBOUND LANE OF TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 55 AND MOHAWK DRIVE. WEST SIDE OF MOWHAWK DRIVE. ELEVATION = 998.180 2.TOP NUT HYDRANT, NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF CHIPPAWA ROAD AND HACKAMORE DRIVE. ELEVATION = 1007.372 BENCHMARK FES 900 NA STO-8 &915" RCP APRON STMH 901 48"R-1642-B STO-1 STMH 902 48"R-1642-B STO-1 UTILITY SCHEMATIC (NORTH)1 OCS 4 48"GALVANIZED C7.6/4 W >> OE OE OE OE >> >> OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I >I I I I I I I I I I I I >> >> III 182 185 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 980.6 1 2 3 4 5 6 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 2223 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 3738 39 40 41 42 43 4445 46 47 48 49 5051 52 53 54 55 56 5758 59606162 63 64 71 73 74 130 131132 133 134 135136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152153 154155 156 157 163164 165 166 167 168 169 170171 172173 183184 186187188 189 190 191192 193194195 196197 198 199 200 220 221222223 224 225 226 227 228 229230 231 233234235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248249 250251 252253 254255 256257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294295 296 297 298 299 300 301302 303 304 305 306 307308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 ST S >> ST S >> S T S > > S T S > > S T S > > S T S > > S T S > > STS >> STS >> STS >> S T S > > STS >> STS >> ST S >> STS >> STS >> STS >> ST S >> ST S >> S T S >> ST S >> S T S >> >> S T S >> S T S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> STS >>STS >>STS >> ST S >> ST S >> STS >>STS >> STS >> STS > > S T S > > STS >> STS >> STS>>STS>>STS>>STS>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> > > >> > > ST M S T M S T M STM S T M STMSTM ST M STM STM STM S T M ST M S T M S T M S T M >> >> >> >>>> >> W >> OE OE OE OE >> >> OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I >I I I I I I I I I I I I >> >> III 182 185 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 980.6 1 2 3 4 5 6 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 2223 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 3738 39 40 41 42 43 4445 46 47 48 49 5051 52 53 54 55 56 5758 59606162 63 64 71 73 74 130 131132 133 134 135136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152153 154155 156 157 163164 165 166 167 168 169 170171 172173 183184 186187188 189 190 191192 193194195 196197 198 199 200 220 221222223 224 225 226 227 228 229230 231 233234235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248249 250251 252253 254255 256257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294295 296 297 298 299 300 301302 303 304 305 306 307308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 wet 1 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 34 56 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 9 4 3 2 1 OUTLOT G OU T L O T F OUTLOT J OUTLOT J OUTLOT H OUTLOT H OUTLOT K OUTLOT I OUTLOT I OUTLOT K OUTLOT K OUTLOT K OUTLOT K 7 OUTLOT L OUTLOT L 8 14 9 10 11 12 13 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 3 4 ST S >> ST S >> S T S > > S T S > > S T S > > S T S > > S T S > > STS >> STS >> STS >> S T S > > STS >> STS >> ST S >> STS >> STS >> STS >> ST S >> ST S >> S T S >> ST S >> S T S >> >> S T S >> S T S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> STS >>STS >>STS >> ST S >> ST S >> STS >>STS >> STS >> STS > > S T S > > STS >> STS >> STS>>STS>>STS>>STS>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> > > >> > > ST M S T M S T M STM S T M STMSTM ST M STM STM STM S T M ST M S T M S T M S T M >> >> >> >>>> >> %1.0 %1.9 %1.0 %0.5 %0.55 87 . 5 E O F %0.5 88.1 88 . 1 88.1 88.1 8 8 . 1 996 9 9 0 9 9 0 998 992 9 8 8 9 8 8 9 9 2 9 9 8 99 0 9 8 6 9 8 6 974 976 978 984 9 8 2 98 0 98 0 982 9 8 4 988 992 984 99 4 990 9 8 2 996 9 9 6 9 9 6 990 994 986 994 992 994 996 994 99 8 99 6 99 2 9 9 4 9 9 6 9 9 4 99 6 99 4 99 6 992 992 99 2 9 9 0 98 6 988 984 984 9 8 4 9 8 6 984 985 990 99 2 99 4 9 8 2 9 9 4 99 0 9 9 2 9 9 2 9 8 6 990 988 986 990 9 9 2 988 994 996 990 9 8 6 998 986 986 9 9 0 996 982 9 8 4 9 9 2 990 99 4 99 4 9 8 8 9 8 4 9 9 2 990 9 9 2 994 994 990 9 8 6 99 4 98 6 9 9 4 99 4 9 9 4 994 9 9 0 986 994 99 4 9 9 2 9 8 6 990 994 99 4 99 0 992 99 0 99 2 99 4 98 8 99 2 99 4 99 2 99 2 99 4 99 6 9 9 2 99 4 985 987 98 6 98 5 987 987 98 6 987 987 992 986 99 6 996 9 8 3 981 980 978 976 974973 9 8 4 9 8 0 97 4 9 8 0 97 6 97 3 973 974 978 981 9 8 4 9 7 3 9 7 4 9 7 8 98 1 9 8 3 976 980 98 4 990 983 982 980 978 976 974 984 98 4 9 8 4 984 992 990 98 6 9 8 8 9 9 0 9 8 6 988 994 992 9 9 0 988 9 8 6 9 8 4 982 9 8 8 98 4 99 4 99 0 986 993 994 9 8 2 98 2 982 982 988 99 4 994 98 8994 9 8 8 984 985 985 988 986 984 9 9 2 9 8 6 994 99 2 98 8 9 8 4 986 98 8 982 98 4 98 8 986 994 996996 986 988 992 9 8 8 98 2 97 4 97 4 974 976 978 980 978 9 7 4 982 980 978 976 974 99 0 99 2 996 996 986 99 4 99 4 994 994 994 988 990 992 992 986 E F G E W RE U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E REUSE IRRIGATION LINE RE U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E R E U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E R E U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E R E U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E R E U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E RE U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E IRRIGATION FILTRATION AND PUMP HOUSE AND BACKUP WELL W RE U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E REUSE IRRIGATION LINE RE U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E R E U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E R E U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E R E U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E R E U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E RE U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E IRRIGATION FILTRATION AND PUMP HOUSE AND BACKUP WELL L7.1 4 Wetland Sign (Typ.) L7.1 4 Wetland Sign (Typ.) TREES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME MATURE SIZE PLANTING SIZE ROOT COND. 152 Overstory Tree 60`H x 30`W 2"Cal B & B 58 Privacy and Boulevard Tree 60`H x 40`W 2"Cal B & B EVERGREEN TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME MATURE SIZE PLANTING SIZE ROOT COND. ABBA 35 Abies balsamea / Balsam Fir 60`H x 30`W 6` Ht.B & B LALA 5 Larix laricina / Tamarack 70`H x 50`W 6` Ht.B & B PIGL 21 Picea glauca / White Spruce 50`H x 20`W 6` Ht.B & B PIST 20 Pinus strobus / Eastern White Pine 70` H x 40` W 6` Ht.B & B THOC 18 Thuja occidentalis / American Arborvitae 40`H x 15`W 6` Ht.B & B PLANT SCHEDULE NORTH - BUFFER REUSE IRRIGATION LINEREUSE IRRIGATION LINE NORTH 0 100 200 CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #1 DATED 09.14.21 REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #2 DATED 12.09.21 CNC RCH RCH 2021-08-16 2021-11-08 2022-02-02 PROJECT NO. FILE NAME LA N D F O R M c IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. PROJECT CERTIFICATION 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 Web: landform.net Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY DEVELOPER MUNICIPALITY WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA-NORTH MEDINA, MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 02.02.2022 MEH17003 20 2 2 MARK SMITH 2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 TEL (612) 490-0558 L201MEH003.dwg LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH L2.1 Contact Utility Service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning. Coordinate installation with Contractors performing related work. Seed mixture (BWSR Mesic Short Urban South and West) as defined by the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources. Native Seeds shall be of Minnesota origin and certified by the Minnesota Crop Improvement Association (MCIA). Provide verifying documentation to the Owner 30 days minimum prior to installation. Plant material shall conform to the American Association of Nurserymen Standards and be of hardy stock, free from disease, infestation, damage, and disfiguration. For discrepancy between the number of plants on the Schedule and the number shown on the Drawing, the Drawing shall govern. All existing deciduous/coniferous trees are to be trimmed of dead wood and pruned to a natural uniform shape. Planting soil shall consist of 4 parts topsoil to 1 part peat humus, with 3 pounds of commercial fertilizer added per cubic yard. Spread a minimum of 4 inches of topsoil and seed/sod all turf areas disturbed by Construction. Protective fencing should be installed around all planted trees. See L7.1 sheet for Detail. Follow MNDOT Seeding Manual for planting instructions for establishment of native seed and provide coordination for required erosion prevention and sediment control. Install a 4-foot diameter shredded hardwood mulch dish around trees not placed within a Shrub or Perennial Planting Bed. Vinyl edging is not required, unless noted otherwise. In-ground irrigation systems may not connect to city water, they must connect to pond or well water. All disturbed areas in the wetland buffers must be restored with native vegetation, and restoration must be maintained and replanted as needed for a duration of not less than the first two full growing seasons after planting. Wetland buffer signs to be installed at a minimum one per lot, on all common lot lines, and placed every 250' thereafter. Sod areas from back of curb to 20' beyond building footprint, provide turf seed (MNDOT 25-151 Residential Turf) for all other turf areas. The Site should be mulched and disc-anchored following packing using MnDOT Type 3 weed free mulch, at a rate of 2.0 tons per acre. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. GENERAL NOTES LANDSCAPE NOTES LANDSCAPE - R2 ZONING Area Proposed Developement R2 R2 R2 R2 Required Buffer Yard Opacity 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 Width of Buffer Yard 20 35 25 35 Minimum Planting Points per 100 Lineal Feet 320 62 68 140 Length of Buffer Yard 838' 718' 95' 400' Total Points Required 2682 445 65 560 Total Overstory Trees Provided (50 planting points each) 54 29 0 12 Total Medium Deciduous / Coniferous Trees Provided (20 planting Points each) 0 0 4 0 D E F LANDSCAPE - BUFFER YARDS LEGEND Adjacent District Rural R3 R3 R1 PLANT SCHEDULE D D G 13. 13. (Typ) 13. (Typ) 13. (Typ) I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request. Joshua K. Popehn License No:Date: MO H A W K D R I V E CHIPPEWA ROAD 14. 15.(Typ) Wetland Buffer 14. 15. 14. 15.(Typ) Wetland Buffer 15.(Typ) Wetland Buffer 14. Wetland Buffer 14. 15.(Typ) Wetland Buffer Silt Fence Silt Fence Silt Fence Silt Fence 14. Wetland Buffer Silt Fence Wetland Delineation 1.TOP NUT HYDRANT, 725 FEET ± FROM THE CENTERLINES INTERSECTION OF THE WESTBOUND LANE OF TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 55 AND MOHAWK DRIVE. WEST SIDE OF MOWHAWK DRIVE. ELEVATION = 998.180 2.TOP NUT HYDRANT, NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF CHIPPAWA ROAD AND HACKAMORE DRIVE. ELEVATION = 1007.372 BENCHMARK This Landscape Plan has been developed to meet three landscaping requirements as defined by code: (A) Lot landscaping for R-1, R-2, R-3 zoning, (B) Buffer Yards, and (C) Privacy and Boulevard Trees. For construction Staking and Surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070. 1. 2. A B C R-2 Zoning - tree locations have been provided as a guide for lot builders who are responsible for required landscaping at the time of home construction. A generic tree symbol is used in these instances. Tree species selection for these must conform with the provided list. No species should comprise more than 25% of the total planting. Buffer Yards - tree locations and species have been provided to conform with City calculations and requirements. Any modifications to this plan must be approved by the City of Medina at the time of building permit. Privacy and Boulevard Trees - tree locations have been provided for additional privacy and boulevard trees. Tree species selection for these must conform with the provided list. No species should comprise more than 25% of the total planting.B (Typ) A (Typ) Front Yard Trees: Minimum Size: Location: Type: R2 Requirements Two overstory trees per lot Deciduous trees should be minimum 2 caliper inches measured 4 feet off the ground Coniferous trees should be minimum 6 feet in height Fifteen feet from front lot line. Applies to both trees for single family dwellings and one tree for two-family dwellings Native species are required. A variety of tree species are required, no one species should be more than 25% of the total. Final selections should comply with the provided list of trees, which also comply with City tree requirements. ACCEPTABLE TREE SPECIES SELECTION Deciduous Trees Ash, Black (Fraxinus nigra) Aspen, bigtooth (Populus grandidentata) Aspen, quaking (Populus tremuloides) Basswood, American (Tilia americana) Birch, paper (Betula papyrifera) Birch, river (Betula nigra) Birch, yellow (Betula alleghaniensis) Cherry pin (Prunus pensylvanica) Elm, American (Ulmus americana)* Hickory, bitternut (Carya cordiformis) Honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos) Hornbeam, American (Carpinus caroliniana) Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana) Maple, Sugar (Acer saccharum) Maple, Red (Acer rubrum) *cultivars resistant to Dutch Elm Disease Coniferous Trees Cedar, Northern White (Thuja occidentalis) Fir, Balsam (Abies balsamea) Spruce, White (Picea glauca) Pine, Eastern White (Pinus strobus) Oak, Red (Quercus rubra) Oak, White (Quercus alba) Oak, Bur (Quercus macrocarpa) Oak, Swamp White (Quercus bicolor) Walnut, Black (Salix nigra) Buffer Yard Requirements 15.(Typ) Wetland 1a-North HWL = 979.08 Wetland Delineation BWSR Mesic Short Urban South and West 45.95 lbs/acre Irrigation Line Wetland Boundary Wetland Buffer Limits of Grading Provide sod from back of curb to 20' behind building footprint. For other turf areas seed with mix: MNDOT 25-151 Residential Turf (120 lbs/acre) 16. 16.(Typ) 16.(Typ) 16. 16. (Typ) MNDOT Wet Meadow South and West 12 lbs/acre MNDOT 25-131 Low Maintenance Turf 220 lbs/acre 17. 17.(Typ) 17. (Typ) 17. (Typ) 17. (Typ) 10.9 Acres / 503 lbs seed Sod = 6.2 acres Seed = 2.6 acres / 317 lbs seed 0.1 Acres / 1.2 lbs seed 0.6 Acres / 135 lbs seed Quantity MnDOT Type 3 weed free mulch will be used for erosion control and stabilization on all seeded areas 2.0 tons per acre17. 14.3 Acres total seeded area / 29 tons mulch )) ) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) ))))) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) )))))) ) ))))) ) ) 7 8 432 3 1 2 1 4 2 3 BLK 6 1 8 9 5 BLK 1 4 -0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 -0+22 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 10+ 0 0 11 + 0 0 12 + 0 0 13 + 0 0 14 + 0 0 15 + 0 0 15 + 5 0 . 4 8 -0+50 0+00 1+00 2+ 0 0 3+ 0 0 4+ 0 0 5+ 0 0 6+ 0 0 7+ 0 0 7+ 5 2 . 2 5 -0+20 0+00 1+00 2+ 0 0 3+00 4+00 4+61.32 (9P) BTM = 976.00 NWL = 985.00 HWL = 986.90 FILTRATION BASIN (16P) BTM = 984.50 HWL = 987.38 POND (14P) BTM = 975.00 NWL = 984.00 HWL = 986.34 WETLAND 5b W E T 5 a H W L = 9 8 4 . 2 8 1 0 0 - Y R B - B = 9 8 7 . 8 0 WETLAND 1f HWL = 985.07 POND 3 HWL = 990.80 WETLAND 2 HWL = 986.23 FOREBAY (13P) BTM = 979.00 NWL = 986.00 HWL = 987.66 5 0 ' 50 ' 25 ' 35'25 ' 25 ' 25' 35' 25' 35 ' 2 5 ' 50' 15' 3 0 ' 50' 59' BLK 3 33 ' 38' 2 0 ' OUTLOT B 4 3 2 1 2 1 OU T L O T F 7 13 40' BR O O K V I E W LA N E OUTLOT EOUTLOT E >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >>>> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> W >> OE OE WE T L A N D 2 33 33 3333 33 WE T L A N D 1 g >> WL 3 WE T L A N D 1f WL 5a ST-11 EL=997.4 ST-12 EL=990.2 ST-13 EL=991.7 ST-14 EL=988.3 ST-15 EL=989.0 ST-22 EL=985.8 L.P.H.P. L.P. H.P. CL CL L. P . L.P. L.P . L. P . HWLHWLHWLHWLHWLHWL H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L HWL HW L HWL HWL HW L HW L HW L HWL CL CL 90.13 EX.CL 994.86 EX.CL 993.17 H.P. 90 . 2 8 %1.0 %1.9 %1.0 %0.5 G. B . 91 . 7 8 94.54 89 . 5 4 CL CL L.P. 91.9 0 H. P . 93 . 8 5 93.34 93.33 L.P . 92 . 4 0 91.1 8 L.P. 93.43 H.P. EOF EO F 87 . 5 E O F CL CL VM A % %0.5 88.1 88 . 1 88.1 88.1 8 8 . 1 VM A VM A G B VMA 986 990 988 988 988 99 2 98 6 982 98 6 986 988 990 990 990 990 979 980 982 984986 992 990 987 988 99 2 99 2 9 9 0 99 0 98 5 98 4 982 980 978 978 986 985 984 982 980 978 92 . 3 8 986 988 988 986 98 6 98 8 98 8 986 98 8 9 8 8 9 8 6 984 988 986 988 988 TW=986.5 BW=984.0 TW=986.5 BW=980.0 TW=986.5 BW=980.0 TW=986.5 BW=982.0 99 2 99 2 99 4 92.3 89.1 88.5 96.5 96 . 0 91.092.0 94 . 0 91.7 93 . 8 91.7 88.0 88.0 88.3 88.3 987.0 994.0 986.0 986.0 91.7 89.4 95.8 89.5 97.5 95.1 89.5 95.5 88.5 94.2 91.9 89.3 94.7 95.1 94.5 95.0 95.5 92.6 94.0 91.1 92.8 85.5 86.0 87.0 87.5 90 . 7 91.4 9 5 . 7 95 . 0 95 . 9 95 . 5 94.1 93.5 92.7 91.2 90.3 90.4 92.6 91.1 95 . 0 97 . 5 87.0 89.5 87.5 88. 0 88.2 87.7 8 8 . 9 8 7 . 0 83 . 7 86.6 84.0 82.2 82.4 8 4 . 9 86. 3 87.0 84. 5 8 4 . 4 8 4 . 6 8 4 . 1 86.0 86.5 88.0 87.5 85. 2 86. 0 8 8 . 0 87.8 89. 5 86.35 8 8 . 5 88.5 96.5 88.5 96.3 86. 1 85.4 87 . 0 86. 9 % 2.0 8 5 . 3 GF = 9 9 4 . 5 GF = 994.5 GF = 9 9 4 . 5 GF = 9 9 3 . 5 DR P 1C GF = 9 9 2 . 5 GF = 9 9 3 . 0 EO F EO F E O F E O F EO F EOF 87.0 HWL HWL HWL H W L H W L HWL HWL HWL H W L H W L H W L HWLHWLHWLHWLHWLHWL HWL HWLHWLHWLHWLHW L HW L HWL HWL HW L HW L HW L H W L H W L H W L HWL H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L HWL HWLHWL H W L HW L HW L HW L H W L HWL H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L HWLHWLHWLHWL HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L H W L HWL HWLHWL H W L H W L HWLHWL HWLHWL HWL H W L H W L H W L H W L HW L HW L HWL HWL HWL HWL H W L H W L H W L H W L HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL H W L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L H W L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HWL HWL HWL HW L HW L H W L HWLHWLHWL HW L HWL HW L HW L HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL 86.85 86.85 86.85 86 . 8 5 86 . 8 5 HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HW L HWLHWL HWL HWL HWL HW L HW L HW L HW L HWL HWL HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HWL 86 . 8 5 FBW O 988. 8 GF = 9 9 4 . 5 98 7 . 0 FB W O 98 6 . 5 GF=9 9 8 . 0 990.5 FBW O 990.0 GF=9 9 5 . 5 988.0 FBW O 987.5 GF = 9 9 5 . 5 98 8 . 0 FB W O 98 7 . 5 GF = 9 9 6 . 0 98 8 . 5 FB W O 98 8 . 0 GF = 9 9 4 . 5 98 7 . 0 FB W O 98 6 . 5 99 3 . 3 98 6 . 5 FB W O 98 6 . 0 G F = 9 9 6 . 0 9 8 8 . 5 F B W O GF=995.1 989.7 FBLO 992.2 GF = 9 9 7 . 0 98 9 . 5 FB W O 98 9 . 0 GF=996.5 889.0 FBLO 991.5 GF=997.5 890.0 FBLO 992.5 GF=99 6 . 7 989.2FBWO 988.7 GF = 9 9 6 . 5 989 . 0 FB W O 98 8 . 5 GF = 9 9 8 . 0 99 0 . 5 FB W O 99 0 . 0 GF = 9 9 2 . 8 99 0 . 1 SE W O 98 9 . 6 GF = 9 9 8 . 0 99 0 . 5 FB W O 99 0 . 0 GF = 9 9 7 . 0 98 9 . 5 FB W O 98 9 . 0 988 9 8 8 9 8 6 988 992 992994 992 994 9 9 2 988 992 988 990 98 8 98 6 994 992 990 990 990 992 9 8 6 99 0 98 6 9 8 6 992 99 4 99 6 996 99 4 9 8 6 98 8 9 8 6 986 990 98 6 990 99 0 990 990 990 994 9 9 4 99 0 99 0 990 992 98 6 99 2 9 9 2 99 0 994 996 9 9 0 99 4 984 9 8 8 988 98 8 992 99 0 990 98 8 9 8 8 9 8 8 988987 98 5 984 9 8 7 990 98 8 992 992 98 4 99 2 9 9 4 9 9 4 994 98 8 98 6 98 4 . 5 9 8 6 9 8 8 986 990 994 988 98 6 994 98 8 97 6 97 8 98 0 98 2 98 3 98 4 985 98 5 985 984 986 994 99 6 98 6 98 8 99 0 988 990 98 8994 9 8 8 992 990 988 986 984 9 9 2 986 9 8 8 9 8 8 9 8 8 986 9 9 6 99 4 98 8 994 996 988 984 988 990 984 DROP 3C 994 996 GF=994.4 989.7 FBLO 992.2 DROP 4C 994 99 2 992 C7.1 2 FES EROSION CONTROL (TYP) C7.1 1 TEMPORARY COMPOST BIO LOG ENKAMAT (TYP) C7.1 2 SILT FENCE HEAVY DUTY C7.1 3,4&9 INLET PROTECTION OCS 9 C7.1 3,4&9 INLET PROTECTION C7.1 10 SILT FENCE HEAVY DUTY LEAPING CIRCLE C7.1 5 SILT FENCE C7.1 2 FES EROSION CONTROL (TYP) ENTRANCE C7.1 1 TEMPORARY COMPOST BIO LOG BLANKET FUTU R E A R E A MO H A W K R O A D DR I V E HI L L S I D E DEER CBMH 1301 CB 903A CBMH 903 STMH 902 STMH 901 FES 1802 STMH 1801 FES 1203A CBMH 1203 CBMH 1202 FES 1202A FES 1200 STMH 1302 CBMH 1311 CB 1311A CBMH 1312 CB 1313 OCS 8 CBMH 1303 CBMH 1304 CBMH 1305 CB 1305A OCS 10 CHIPPEWA ROAD OCS 4 FES 4 INV=984.90 INV=985.00 INV=986.50 INV=985.77 STMH 1201 INV=987.80 FES 10 FES 1314 INV: 986.00 FES 5 FES 1800 FES 900 INV=984.5 INV=984.20 INV=984.00 FES 1300 FES 8 INV=983.90 INV=981.73 INV=981.80 OCS 5 MH 1EX. SAN MH MH 2 MH 32 MH 33 MH 31 MH 34 MH 35 FES 1900 INV: 981.20 FES 1902 INV: 981.20 NORTH 0 50 100 RCH RCH RCH RCH 2021-08-16 2021-09-23 2021-11-08 2022-02-02 PROJECT NO. FILE NAME LA N D F O R M c IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. PROJECT CERTIFICATION 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 Web: landform.net Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY DEVELOPER MUNICIPALITY WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA SOUTH MEDINA, MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 02.02.2022 MEH17003 20 2 2 MARK SMITH 2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 TEL (612) 490-0558 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request. Randall C. Hedlund License No:Date: CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL CITY REVIEW COMMENTS REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #1 DATED 09.14.21 REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #2 DATED 12.09.21 C301MEH003.dwg GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL C3.1 SE E S H E E T C 3 . 3 SYMBOL DESCRIPTION LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 910 908 :MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED) :MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED) :MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING) :MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING) ESTIMATED QUANTITY FOR ENTIRE PROJECT Contact utility service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning grading. Geotechnical report has not yet been received, it will be provided once obtained. Remove topsoil from grading areas and stockpile sufficient quantity for reuse. Materials may be mined from landscape areas for use on site and replaced with excess organic material with prior Owner approval. Remove surface and ground water from excavations. Provide initial lifts of stable foundation material if exposed soils are wet and unstable. Rough grade Building Pad to 12 Inches below Finished Floor Elevation (FFE). Refer to Structural Specifications for earthwork requirements for building pads. An Independent Testing Firm shall verify the removal of organic and unsuitable soils, soil correction, and compaction and provide periodic reports to the Owner. Place and compact fill using lift thicknesses matched to soil type and compaction equipment to obtain specified compaction throughout the lift. Compact cohesive soils in paved areas to 95% of maximum dry density, Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) except the top 3 feet which shall be compacted to 100%. Compact to 98% density where fill depth exceeds 10 feet. The soils shall be within 3% of optimum moisture content. In granular soils all portions of the embankment shall be compacted to not less than 95% of Modified Proctor Density (ASTM D1557). 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Install perimeter sediment controls prior to beginning work and maintain for duration of construction. Remove controls after areas contributing runoff are permanently stabilized and dispose of off site. Install inlet protection: Wimco RD or CG models as appropriate, or approved equal. Maintain protection until project is stabilized. Limit soil disturbance to the grading limits shown. Schedule operations to minimize length of exposure of disturbed areas. Management practices shown are the minimum requirement. Install and maintain additional controls as work proceeds to prevent erosion and control sediment carried by wind or water. Refer to SWPPP Notes on Sheet C3.8 for additional requirements. Contractor shall prevent sediment laden water from entering the filtration / infiltration system until the site is completely stabilized. All exposed soils areas shall be stabilized immediately to limit soil erosion in that portion of the site where construction has temporarily or permanently ceased. See Landscape Sheets for permanent turf and landscape establishment. Scrape adjacent streets clean daily and sweep clean weekly. Seed, Sod, Mulch and Fertilizer shall meet the following Specifications, as modified. Item Specification Number Sod MNDOT 3878 Seed MNDOT 3876 MN TYPE 22-111 @ 30.5 LB/AC - Temporary Erosion Control MN TYPE 25-151 @ 120 LB/AC - Permanent Turf Mulch MNDOT 3882 MNDOT TYPE 1 @ 2 TON/AC Disc Anchored) MNDOT 3881 General placement MNDOT 2575 Erosion Control Blanket MNDOT 3885 MNDOT TYPE 3N 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. GRADING NOTESEROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES 5 Spot Elevations at curblines indicate flowlines unless noted otherwise. See Sheet C4.1 for rim elevations of catch basins. Refer to Import Stockpile on Sheet C3.0. Reserved. 24. 26. PAVING NOTES NO SCALE TYPICAL LOT DETAIL1 NOTES: 1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY. : REAR ELEVATION : BUILDING TYPE : MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION : FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION : DRP 1' DENOTES DISTANCE GARAGE FLOOR IS DROPPED FROM TYPICAL. DRP 1' MAIN STREET BLK 1 5 X 105.0 X 105.0 X 106.5 X 106.5 DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNER ELEVATIONS DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 20' FRONT 10' SIDE 10' REAR UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE DENOTES BUILDING SETBACKS BUILDING TYPES: FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALK OUT FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT FB = FULL BASEMENT DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW 4. 5 % DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPE GF=108.5 100.0 FB 108.3 25 5 5 25. :Pavement Sawcut :Construction Limits HWL :100 YEAR HIGH WATER LINE 3 1.Top nut hydrant, 725 feet ± from the centerlines intersection of the westbound lane of trunk highway no. 55 and Mohawk Drive. West side of Mowhawk Drive. Elevation = 998.180 2.Top nut hydrant, northeast quadrant of the intersection of Chippawa road and Hackamore Drive. Elevation = 1007.372 BENCHMARK GENERAL NOTES For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070. Site is located within the boundaries of the elm creek watershed management commission (ecwmc). Denotes borrow area. After material is removed contractor to bring bottom of pond to elevation shown in pond callout with grading spoil. 1. 2. :Inlet Protection nn :Silt Fence (North 10,430) (South 8,400) (Chippewa 6,670) :Vehicle Tracking Pad :Compost or Bio Log (North 50) (South 300) (Chippewa 450) ))))))))))))) :Erosion Control Blanket :Heavy Duty Silt Fence (North 5,995) (South 5,985) (Chippewa 4,725) :Wetland Impact Area :Flood Plain Impact Area :Flood Plain Mitigation Area 49 Each 25,500 Feet 800 Feet 16,705 Feet HH CABX CABX CABX C A B X CAB X HH INV=981.53 CMP INV 36 INV=981.87 CMP INV 36 OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OT V O T V >> 33 33 33 WE T L A N D 1 g >> 980. 6 980. 6 WE T L A N D 4 WE T L A N D 5 b WL 1h ST-14 EL=988.3 ST-16 EL=990.5 RE=982.28 INV 12IN CMP RE=982.70 INV 12IN CMP 98 0 . 6 981 . 5 98 1 . 5 981. 5 981.5 >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> )) ) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) )))) ) ) ) )))) ) ) ) )))) % 4.5 H.P . -0+0 0 1 + 0 0 2+00 3 + 0 0 3+14 . 7 3 L.P. % 5.2 % 7. 1 % 7 . 1 % 8 . 0 % 7 . 4 % 7. 4 % 7. 4 % 7.1 % 5. 6 % 5 . 1 % 5 . 6 EX.CL CL C L 990.50 EX.CL 994.86 88.12 93 . 5 8 %1.0 %1.0 93 . 6 1 % 1.2 5 94. 9 4 H.P . % 1.0 % 1.3 G.B . % 1.0 % 5.3 % 4.0 %3.2 % 3.0 % 4 . 2 % 4.4 % 4.8 L.P. 91.9 0 %2.8 94.0 6 E O F L.P . H.P . % 2.9 92.5 5 % 1.0 91. 8 0 % 1.2 5 % 3.3 VM A % 8. 0 V M A > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > % 0 . 6 %.6 94. 9 5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 90 . 7 92.2 91.4 93.8 93.9 94. 5 93.2 94. 0 92 . 2 94 . 0 86 . 5 89 . 0 9 2 . 4 9 3 . 5 9 2 . 7 95. 4 9 0 . 8 9 2 . 3 8 9 . 1 9 0 . 5 8 8 . 5 90.3 9 0 . 5 90.3 89.6 88.9 91. 7 9 0 . 7 87.5 92.8 9 9 4 . 1 90.5 92.0 90.5 95 . 7 93.7 94 . 5 95. 0 95. 7 95.295.7 9 5 . 2 9 5 . 7 95 . 0 95 . 9 94 . 7 95 . 5 87.5 87.7 87.7 87.7 87.7 82.4 82. 9 84. 1 84. 5 87 . 8 93. 7 9 7 . 9 9 7 . 9 89.0 8 6 . 5 8 5 . 6 86.3 86. 3 86. 3 86.6 87.5 8 6 . 4 8 6 . 5 84.1 8 4 . 9 8 4 . 6 8 4 . 1 86 . 8 86 . 8 86 . 7 86. 7 86. 7 86.7 86 . 3 3 87. 5 9 4 . 2 2.0% 2.0% 9 2 . 2 9 4 . 4 92.3 > > > 9 3 . 0 9 2 . 5 2.0 % 87. 5 87 . 1 2. 0 % 2. 0 % > > DRO P 2C DR O P 2C DRO P 1C E O F E O F EO F E O F HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL H W L H W L H W L H W L HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HW L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L HW L HW L H W L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HWL HWLHWL HW L HW L HWL HWL HWL H W L HW L HW L HW L HW L H W L HW L HW L HW LHWL HW L HWL HWL HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HWL HWL H W L HW L H W L H W L H W L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HWL HWL H W L HW L HW L H W L H W L HW L HW L HW L H W L HW L HW L HWL HWL H W L HWL HWL H W L HWL H W L HW L HW L HW L HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HWL HWL HW L H W L HW L HWL HW L HW L HW L H W L HW L HW L H W L H W L H W L H W L HWL H W L H W L H W L HWL HWL HW L H W L GF=991 . 0 983.5 FB 990.8 GF = 9 9 5 . 0 98 7 . 5 FB W O 98 7 . 0 GF = 9 9 5 . 0 98 7 . 5 FB W O 98 7 . 0 GF = 9 9 4 . 5 987 . 0 FB L O 98 9 . 5 GF= 9 9 5 . 0 987 . 5 FB 994 . 9 GF= 9 9 3 . 0 985. 5 FB 992. 8 GF=991.0 983.5 FB 990.8 GF = 9 9 6 . 2 988 . 7 FB W O 988 . 2 G F = 9 9 6 . 2 9 8 8 . 7 F B W O 9 8 8 . 2 GF = 9 9 6 . 2 988 . 7 FB W O 98 8 . 2 GF = 9 9 5 . 0 98 7 . 5 FB W O 98 7 . 0 GF= 9 9 5 . 4 988 . 6 FB 995 . 9 GF = 9 9 6 . 0 988 . 5 FB W O 988 . 0 GF = 9 9 6 . 2 98 8 . 7 FB W O 98 8 . 2 GF=99 6 . 7 989.2FBWO 988.7 GF= 9 9 1 . 2 988 . 5SEW O988 . 0 GF = 9 9 6 . 5 989 . 0 FB W O 988 . 5 GF= 9 9 4 . 6 988 . 5FBL O991 . 0 GF= 9 9 4 . 6 988 . 5FB L O991 . 0 9 9 4 98 8 988 988 99 0 990 98 8 986 986 986 984 982 980 98 6 980 982 984 992 98 0 98 4 98 6 988 9 8 4 984 988 988 992 98 6 994 9 9 4 9 9 2 98 6 986 986 98 6 988 988 99 2 978 984 983 982 980 978 976 976 980 983 984 985 98 6 986 98 5 98 4 98 3 980 976 975 978 980 982983 984 986 98 8 98 5 98 5 98 7 9 8 5 98 6 9 8 6 98 7 9 8 7 99 2 990 990 9 9 4 994 994 99 4 9 9 4 99 4 99 4 98 8 98 6 99 0 97 7 975 992 984 983.5 994OUTLOT B 6 5 3 4 2 1 7 8 BLK 4 BLK 5 1 2 3 45 6 7 10 9 -0+2 8 0+0 0 1+0 0 2+0 0 2+3 7 . 0 2 -0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+0 0 6+0 0 7+ 0 0 8+ 0 0 9+ 0 0 -0+50 0+00 1+00 POND (18P) BTM = 978.00 NWL = 986.00 HWL = 987.26 IRRIGATION POND (20P) BTM = 975.00 NWL = 984.00 HWL = 986.26 OUTLOT C WET 1h HWL = 983.84 WET 4 HWL = 984.98 WETLAND 5b HWL = 983.37 100-YR B-B = 984.28 OUTLOT D 25 ' 35 ' 35 ' 50' 50' 50 ' B U F F E R 3 0 ' 30' 25 ' 25' 25' 25' 42' 38 ' C7.1 3,4&5 INLET PROTECTION C7.1 10 SILT FENCE HEAVY DUTY C7.1 5 SILT FENCE MO H A W K R O A D C7.1 7 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET DR I V E HILL S I D E BR O O K V I E W C O U R T C7.1 7 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE C7.1 3, 4 & 9 INLET PROTECTION C7.1 3,4&9 INLET PROTECTION C7.1 10 SILT FENCE HEAVY DUTY C7.1 5 SILT FENCE C7.1 2 FES EROSION CONTROL (TYP) C7.1 1 TEMPORARY COMPOST BIO LOG OHW C7.1 8 ROCK CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT STA T E H W Y . 5 5 INV=984.00 MH 38 MH 37 MH 30 MH 29 MH 28 MH 27 MH 26 EX. SAN MH 3 FES 7 FES 1600 FES 1601 INV: 983.32 FES 1500 FES 6 CBMH 1502 CBMH 1501 OCS 6 INV=982.60 INV=985.70 INV=983.80 CBMH 1503 CB 1503B CB 1503A CB 1501B OCS 7 FES 1602 INV=982.60 FES 1603 INV: 983.32 FES 1903 INV= 981.11 FES 1901 INV= 981.11 DNR WETLAND 27-493W SOUTH PORTION OHW = 980.6 FLOODPLAIN = 981.5 ( As of 8/10/20) WE T L A N D 1a - S o u t h PROPOSED 100-YR HWL = 981.94 NORTH 0 50 100 RCH RCH RCH RCH 2021-08-16 2021-09-23 2021-11-08 2022-02-02 PROJECT NO. FILE NAME LA N D F O R M c IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. PROJECT CERTIFICATION 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 Web: landform.net Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY DEVELOPER MUNICIPALITY WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA SOUTH MEDINA, MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 02.02.2022 MEH17003 20 2 2 MARK SMITH 2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 TEL (612) 490-0558 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request. Randall C. Hedlund License No:Date: CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL CITY REVIEW COMMENTS REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #1 DATED 09.14.21 REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #2 DATED 12.09.21 C302MEH003.dwg GRADING , DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL C3.2 :Pavement Sawcut :Construction Limits NO SCALE TYPICAL LOT DETAIL1 SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR TYPICAL LOT DETAIL LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 910 908 :MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED) :MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED) :MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING) :MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING) SEE SHEET C3.1 ESTIMATED QUANTITY FOR ENTIRE PROJECT 3 1.Top nut hydrant, 725 feet ± from the centerlines intersection of the westbound lane of trunk highway no. 55 and Mohawk Drive. West side of Mowhawk Drive. Elevation = 998.180 2.Top nut hydrant, northeast quadrant of the intersection of Chippawa road and Hackamore Drive. Elevation = 1007.372 BENCHMARK Contact utility service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning grading. Geotechnical report has not yet been received, it will be provided once obtained. Remove topsoil from grading areas and stockpile sufficient quantity for reuse. Materials may be mined from landscape areas for use on site and replaced with excess organic material with prior Owner approval. Remove surface and ground water from excavations. Provide initial lifts of stable foundation material if exposed soils are wet and unstable. Rough grade Building Pad to 12 Inches below Finished Floor Elevation (FFE). Refer to Structural Specifications for earthwork requirements for building pads. An Independent Testing Firm shall verify the removal of organic and unsuitable soils, soil correction, and compaction and provide periodic reports to the Owner. Place and compact fill using lift thicknesses matched to soil type and compaction equipment to obtain specified compaction throughout the lift. Compact cohesive soils in paved areas to 95% of maximum dry density, Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) except the top 3 feet which shall be compacted to 100%. Compact to 98% density where fill depth exceeds 10 feet. The soils shall be within 3% of optimum moisture content. In granular soils all portions of the embankment shall be compacted to not less than 95% of Modified Proctor Density (ASTM D1557). 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Install perimeter sediment controls prior to beginning work and maintain for duration of construction. Remove controls after areas contributing runoff are permanently stabilized and dispose of off site. Install inlet protection: Wimco RD or CG models as appropriate, or approved equal. Maintain protection until project is stabilized. Limit soil disturbance to the grading limits shown. Schedule operations to minimize length of exposure of disturbed areas. Management practices shown are the minimum requirement. Install and maintain additional controls as work proceeds to prevent erosion and control sediment carried by wind or water. Refer to SWPPP Notes on Sheet C3.6 for additional requirements. Contractor shall prevent sediment laden water from entering the filtration / infiltration system until the site is completely stabilized. All exposed soils areas shall be stabilized immediately to limit soil erosion in that portion of the site where construction has temporarily or permanently ceased. See Landscape Sheets for permanent turf and landscape establishment. Scrape adjacent streets clean daily and sweep clean weekly. Seed, Sod, Mulch and Fertilizer shall meet the following Specifications, as modified. Item Specification Number Sod MNDOT 3878 Seed MNDOT 3876 MN TYPE 22-111 @ 30.5 LB/AC - Temporary Erosion Control MN TYPE 25-151 @ 120 LB/AC - Permanent Turf Mulch MNDOT 3882 MNDOT TYPE 1 @ 2 TON/AC Disc Anchored) MNDOT 3881 General placement MNDOT 2575 Erosion Control Blanket MNDOT 3885 MNDOT TYPE 3N 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. GRADING NOTES EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES 5 Spot Elevations at curblines indicate flowlines unless noted otherwise. See Sheet C4.1 for rim elevations of catch basins. Grades between proposed spot elevations shall be continuous and nonvariable. Spot Elevations shall govern over contour lines. Meet and Match existing curb. Transition as needed. 24. 25. 26. PAVING NOTES GENERAL NOTES For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070. Site is located within the boundaries of the elm creek watershed management commission (ecwmc). Denotes borrow area. After material is removed contractor to bring bottom of pond to elevation shown in pond callout with grading spoil. 1. 2. 5 HWL :100 YEAR HIGH WATER LINE :Inlet Protection nn :Silt Fence (North 10,430) (South 8,400) (Chippewa 6,670) :Vehicle Tracking Pad 49 Each 3 Each 25,500 Feet :Compost or Bio Log (North 50) (South 300) (Chippewa 450) 800 Feet))))))))))))) :Erosion Control Blanket 12,000 S.Y. :Heavy Duty Silt Fence (North 5,995) (South 5,985) (Chippewa 4,725) 16,705 Feet :Wetland Impact Area :Flood Plain Impact Area :Flood Plain Mitigation Area > > >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ))) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) ))))) ) ) )))) )) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WE T L A N D 1 g 980.6 980. 6 980 . 6 980.6 WE T L A N D 1f WL 5a WL 1h 1182 ST-12 EL=990.2 ST-13 EL=991.7 ST-15 EL=989.0 980.6 9 8 0 . 6 981.5 9 8 1 . 5 981.5 98 1 . 5 9 8 1 . 5 L.P. H.P. % 7.9 % 7.5 % 2.7 % 8. 7 %5.0 % 4.5 L.P. L.P . H.P . -0+0 0 3 + 0 0 3+1 4 . 7 3 L. P . HWLHWLHWLHWLHWL H W L H W L H W L H W L HWL HW L HWL HWL HWL HWL HW L HWL % 5.2 %8.0 %8.0 % 7. 9 % 8. 5 % 9. 1 %9.2 CL C L CL CL 90.13 93 . 5 8 H.P. 90 . 2 8 %5.0 %8.4 %8.4 %8.5 %3.8 % 6.2 %1.0 %0.5 %0.55 93 . 6 1 % 2.2 G. B . % 2. 9 91 . 7 8 % 4. 1 % 1. 7 4 94.54 89 . 5 4 % 1.3 G.B . % 1.0 % 5.3 % 4.4 % 4.8 CL CL % 6.0 % 6 . 1 % 5.3 %2.0 94.0 6 EOF EO F 87 . 5 E O F %2.0 %2.0 % 1. 0 % 1. 5 % 1.2 5 % 3.3 %0.5 88.1 88 . 1 8 8 . 1 VM A VM A G B % 3.0 VMA 986 990 988 988 988 98 6 982 982 982 982 986 988 990 990 990 990 990 990 98 5 98 4 982 980 978 978 986 984 982 980 978 986 98 6 98 8 98 8 986 98 8 9 8 8 9 8 6 984 988 986 984 986 988 986988 988 988 TW=986.5 BW=984.0 TW=986.5 BW=980.0 TW=986.5 BW=980.0 TW=986.5 BW=982.0 > 92.3 89.1 88.5 96.5 96 . 0 91.092.0 94 . 0 91.7 93 . 8 91.7 91.7 89.4 95.8 89.5 97.5 95.1 89.5 95.5 88.5 94.2 91.9 89.3 94.7 95.1 94.5 95.0 95.5 92.6 94.0 91.1 92.8 85.5 86.0 87.0 87.5 90 . 7 92.2 91.4 93. 8 93.9 94. 5 95 . 7 93.7 94 . 5 94 . 7 95 . 5 94.1 93.5 92.7 91.2 90.3 90.4 92.6 91.1 94 . 3 95 . 0 95. 5 96. 2 95 . 3 97 . 5 96 . 0 9 6 . 4 96.6 9 8 . 0 96. 0 96.1 87.0 89.5 9 0 . 0 90.0 988.0 87.5 87.5 88. 0 87.7 82.9 8 4 . 1 85.5 83.2 81.9 8 8 . 9 87 . 0 83 . 7 86.6 84.0 82.2 82.4 82. 9 84. 1 84. 5 8 4 . 4 8 4 . 6 8 4 . 1 86.0 86.5 88.0 87.5 85. 2 86. 0 8 8 . 0 87.8 90 . 0 89. 5 86.35 8 2 . 9 8 8 . 5 88.5 88.5 96.3 87 . 0 86. 9 % 2.0 90.0 8 4 . 0 84.3 8 5 . 3 8 8 . 5 8 8 . 5 DR P 1C EO F EO F E O F E O F EO F EOF 87.0 HWL H W L H W L H W L HWLHWLHWLHWLHWLHWL HWL HWLHWLHWLHWLHW L HW L HWL H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L HW L HWL HWL H W L HWL H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L HWLHWLHWLHWL HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L H W L H W L H W L H W L HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HW L H W L HWL HWL HW L HW L H W L H W L H W L H W L HWL H W L H W L H W L HWL HWL HW L H W L HWL HW L HW L HWL HWL HWL HW L HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HW L HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HW L HWL HW L H W L H W L H W L HW L HWL HWL H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L H W L HW L HW L HWL HW L H W L H W L HWLHWL HW L HW L HWL HWLHWL H W L H W L HWL HWL HWLHWLHWLHWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL H W L HW L HWL HWL HWL H W L HWL HWL HW L H W L HWL HWL HWL HWL H W L HWL HWL HW L H W L HWL HWL 86.85 86.85 86.85 86 . 8 5 86 . 8 5 HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HWL HW L HWLHWL HWL HWL HWL HW L HW L HW L HW L HWL HWL HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HWL 86 . 8 5 GF=9 9 8 . 0 990.5 FBW O 990.0 GF=9 9 5 . 5 988.0 FBW O 987.5 GF = 9 9 8 . 0 990 . 5 FB W O 990 . 0 GF = 9 9 8 . 5 99 1 . 0 FB W O 99 0 . 5 GF=99 8 . 5 991.0 FBWO 990.5 GF = 9 9 5 . 5 98 8 . 0 FB W O 98 7 . 5 GF = 9 9 6 . 0 98 8 . 5 FB W O 98 8 . 0 GF = 9 9 5 . 0 98 7 . 5 FB W O 98 7 . 0 GF = 9 9 4 . 5 98 7 . 0 FB W O 98 6 . 5 99 3 . 3 98 6 . 5 FB W O 98 6 . 0 GF = 9 9 6 . 2 988 . 7 FB W O 98 8 . 2 GF = 9 9 5 . 0 98 7 . 5 FB W O 98 7 . 0 G F = 9 9 7 . 0 9 8 9 . 5 F B W O 9 8 9 . 0 G F = 9 9 6 . 5 98 9 . 0 F B W O 98 8 . 5 G F = 9 9 6 . 0 98 8 . 5 F B W O 9 8 8 . 0 GF=995.1 989.7 FBLO 992.2 GF = 9 9 7 . 0 98 9 . 5 FB W O 98 9 . 0 GF=996.5 889.0 FBLO 991.5 GF=997.5 890.0 FBLO 992.5 GF = 9 9 6 . 0 98 8 . 5 FB W O 98 8 . 0 GF = 9 9 6 . 5 989 . 0 FB W O 988 . 5 GF = 9 9 8 . 0 99 0 . 5 FB W O 99 0 . 0 GF = 9 9 2 . 8 99 0 . 1 SE W O 98 9 . 6 GF = 9 9 8 . 0 99 0 . 5 FB W O 99 0 . 0 GF = 9 9 7 . 0 98 9 . 5 FB W O 98 9 . 0 988 9 8 8 9 8 6 988 992 992994 992 994 9 9 2 988 992 988 990 98 8 988 994 992 990 990 990 992 9 8 6 99 0 986 98 6 9 8 6 9 8 6 98 8 9 8 6 9 8 4 992 990 990 990 98 6 99 2 98 6 9 9 4 9 9 2 998 998 992 994 99 0 9 8 4 9 8 8 988 98 8 992 99 0 990 98 8 9 9 2 9 8 8 9 8 8 988987 98 5 984 9 8 7 990 98 8 98 4 98 4 . 5 9 8 6 9 8 8 986 990 994 9 9 6 9 9 6 98 8 990 988 98 6 988 990 996 994 98 8 97 6 97 8 98 0 98 2 98 3 98 4 985 98 5 985 984 986 98 6 98 8 99 0 988 990 98 4 98 6 98 2 98 2 98 1 . 5 9 8 1 . 5 98 2 982 994 986 9 9 6 9 9 2 9 9 6 9 9 6 996 99 4 98 8 9 8 8 994 996 994 990 988 99 2 996 984 DROP 3C 994 996 GF=994.4 989.7 FBLO 992.2 DROP 4C 994 99 2 992 OUTLOT A 1 2 3 4 56 7 8 BLK 2 2 1 432 3 1 2 1 4 2 3 BLK 6 1 4 9 10 5 BLK 1 4 -0+22 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+ 0 0 7 + 0 0 7 + 0 9 . 4 2 -0+2 8 0+0 0 1+0 0 7+ 0 0 8+ 0 0 9+ 0 0 10+ 0 0 11 + 0 0 12 + 0 0 13 + 0 0 14 + 0 0 15 + 0 0 15 + 5 0 . 4 8 FILTRATION BASIN (16P) BTM = 984.50 HWL = 987.38 POND (14P) BTM = 975.00 NWL = 984.00 HWL = 986.34 W E T 5 a H W L = 9 8 4 . 2 8 1 0 0 - Y R B - B = 9 8 7 . 8 0 WETLAND 1f HWL = 985.07 FOREBAY (13P) BTM = 979.00 NWL = 986.00 HWL = 987.66 1 6 8 ' 172' 5 0 ' 50 ' 25 ' 35'25 ' 25 ' 35 ' 35 ' 2 5 ' 50' 30' 3 0 ' 50' 3 0 ' 59' 5 0 ' BLK 3 33 ' 2 0 ' 42' OUTLOT B INV=XXX.XX C7.1 10 SILT FENCE HEAVY DUTY C7.1 5 SILT FENCE C7.1 2 FES EROSION CONTROL (TYP) BR O O K V I E W C O U R T LEAPING DEER C7.1 1 TEMPORARY COMPOST BIO LOG CIRCLE HI L L S I D E DR I V E C7.1 3,4&9 INLET PROTECTION C7.1 10 SILT FENCE HEAVY DUTY C7.1 5 SILT FENCE C7.1 10 SILT FENCE HEAVY DUTY C7.1 5 SILT FENCE C7.1 1 TEMPORARY COMPOST BIO LOG CHIPPEWA ROAD FES 1203A INV: 986.50 FES 1200 FES 1802 INV: 984.20 FES 900 FES 5 FES 8 FES 1314 INV: 986.00 MH 34 MH 35 MH 36 MH 30 MH 31 MH 32 MH 37 MH 33 CBMH 1203 CBMH 1202STMH 1201 OCS 4 STMH 1302 CBMH 1301 CBMH 1311 CB 1311A CB 1313 CBMH 1312 OCS 8 CBMH 1305 CBMH 1303 CBMH 1304 CB 1305A OCS 5 STMH 1801 INV=983.90 INV=981.73 FES 1800 INV=981.80 INV=984.50 FES 1202A INV=985.77 INV=985.00 FES 1300 INV=984.00 FES 1901 INV= 981.11 FES 1903 INV= 981.11 FES 1902 981.20 FES 1900 981.20 NORTH 0 50 100 RCH RCH RCH RCH 2021-08-16 2021-09-23 2021-11-08 2022-02-02 PROJECT NO. FILE NAME LA N D F O R M c IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. PROJECT CERTIFICATION 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 Web: landform.net Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY DEVELOPER MUNICIPALITY WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA SOUTH MEDINA, MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 02.02.2022 MEH17003 20 2 2 MARK SMITH 2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 TEL (612) 490-0558 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request. Randall C. Hedlund License No:Date: CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL CITY REVIEW COMMENTS REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #1 DATED 09.14.21 REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #2 DATED 12.09.21 C303MEH003.dwg GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL C3.3 SE E S H E E T C 3 . 1 SYMBOL DESCRIPTION LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 910 908 :MAJOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED) :MINOR CONTOUR (PROPOSED) :MAJOR CONTOUR (EXISTING) :MINOR CONTOUR (EXISTING) :Pavement Sawcut :Construction Limits ESTIMATED QUANTITY FOR ENTIRE PROJECT Contact utility service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning grading. Geotechnical report has not yet been received, it will be provided once obtained. Remove topsoil from grading areas and stockpile sufficient quantity for reuse. Materials may be mined from landscape areas for use on site and replaced with excess organic material with prior Owner approval. Remove surface and ground water from excavations. Provide initial lifts of stable foundation material if exposed soils are wet and unstable. Rough grade Building Pad to 12 Inches below Finished Floor Elevation (FFE). Refer to Structural Specifications for earthwork requirements for building pads. An Independent Testing Firm shall verify the removal of organic and unsuitable soils, soil correction, and compaction and provide periodic reports to the Owner. Place and compact fill using lift thicknesses matched to soil type and compaction equipment to obtain specified compaction throughout the lift. Compact cohesive soils in paved areas to 95% of maximum dry density, Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) except the top 3 feet which shall be compacted to 100%. Compact to 98% density where fill depth exceeds 10 feet. The soils shall be within 3% of optimum moisture content. In granular soils all portions of the embankment shall be compacted to not less than 95% of Modified Proctor Density (ASTM D1557). 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Install perimeter sediment controls prior to beginning work and maintain for duration of construction. Remove controls after areas contributing runoff are permanently stabilized and dispose of off site. Install inlet protection: Wimco RD or CG models as appropriate, or approved equal. Maintain protection until project is stabilized. Limit soil disturbance to the grading limits shown. Schedule operations to minimize length of exposure of disturbed areas. Management practices shown are the minimum requirement. Install and maintain additional controls as work proceeds to prevent erosion and control sediment carried by wind or water. Refer to SWPPP Notes on Sheet C3.6 for additional requirements. Contractor shall prevent sediment laden water from entering the filtration / infiltration system until the site is completely stabilized. All exposed soils areas shall be stabilized immediately to limit soil erosion in that portion of the site where construction has temporarily or permanently ceased. See Landscape Sheets for permanent turf and landscape establishment. Scrape adjacent streets clean daily and sweep clean weekly. Seed, Sod, Mulch and Fertilizer shall meet the following Specifications, as modified. Item Specification Number Sod MNDOT 3878 Seed MNDOT 3876 MN TYPE 22-111 @ 30.5 LB/AC - Temporary Erosion Control MN TYPE 25-151 @ 120 LB/AC - Permanent Turf Mulch MNDOT 3882 MNDOT TYPE 1 @ 2 TON/AC Disc Anchored) MNDOT 3881 General placement MNDOT 2575 Erosion Control Blanket MNDOT 3885 MNDOT TYPE 3N 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. GRADING NOTESEROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES 5 Spot Elevations at curblines indicate flowlines unless noted otherwise. See Sheet C4.1 for rim elevations of catch basins. Grades between proposed spot elevations shall be continuous and nonvariable. Spot Elevations shall govern over contour lines. Meet and Match existing curb. Transition as needed. 24. 25. 26. PAVING NOTES NO SCALE TYPICAL LOT DETAIL1 NOTES: 1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY. : REAR ELEVATION : BUILDING TYPE : MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION : FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION : DRP 1' DENOTES DISTANCE GARAGE FLOOR IS DROPPED FROM TYPICAL. DRP 1' MAIN STREET BLK 1 5 X 105.0 X 105.0 X 106.5 X 106.5 DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNER ELEVATIONS DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 20' FRONT 10' SIDE 10' REAR UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE DENOTES BUILDING SETBACKS BUILDING TYPES: FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALK OUT FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT SEWO = SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT FB = FULL BASEMENT DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW 4. 5 % DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPE GF=108.5 100.0 FB 108.3 5 HWL :100 YEAR HIGH WATER LINE 3 1.Top nut hydrant, 725 feet ± from the centerlines intersection of the westbound lane of trunk highway no. 55 and Mohawk Drive. West side of Mowhawk Drive. Elevation = 998.180 2.Top nut hydrant, northeast quadrant of the intersection of Chippawa road and Hackamore Drive. Elevation = 1007.372 BENCHMARK GENERAL NOTES For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070. Site is located within the boundaries of the elm creek watershed management commission (ecwmc). Denotes borrow area. After material is removed contractor to bring bottom of pond to elevation shown in pond callout with grading spoil. 1. 2. :Inlet Protection nn :Silt Fence (North 10,430) (South 8,400) (Chippewa 6,670) :Vehicle Tracking Pad :Compost or Bio Log (North 50) (South 300) (Chippewa 450) ))))))))))))) :Erosion Control Blanket :Heavy Duty Silt Fence (North 5,995) (South 5,985) (Chippewa 4,725) :Wetland Impact Area :Flood Plain Impact Area :Flood Plain Mitigation Area 49 Each 25,500 Feet 800 Feet 16,705 Feet 0+ 0 0 OUTLOT A OUTLOT B 1 2 3 4 56 7 8 BLK 2 6 5 3 4 2 1 7 8 432 3 1 2 1 4 2 3 BLK 6 BLK 4 BLK 5 1 1 2 3 45 6 7 9 10 9 5 BLK 1 4 -0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 -0+22 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+ 0 0 7 + 0 0 7 + 0 9 . 4 2 -0+2 8 0+0 0 1+0 0 2+0 0 2+3 7 . 0 2 -0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+0 0 6+0 0 7+ 0 0 8+ 0 0 9+ 0 0 10+ 0 0 11 + 0 0 12 + 0 0 13 + 0 0 14 + 0 0 15 + 0 0 15 + 5 0 . 4 8 FILTRATION BASIN (16P) BTM = 984.50 HWL = 987.38 POND (18P) BTM = 978.00 NWL = 986.00 HWL = 987.26 IRRIGATION POND (20P) BTM = 975.00 NWL = 984.00 HWL = 986.26 POND (14P) BTM = 975.00 NWL = 984.00 HWL = 986.34 PROPOSED 100-YR HWL = 981.94 OUTLOT C WET 1h HWL = 983.84 WETLAND 5b HWL = 983.37 100-YR B-B = 984.28 W E T 5 a H W L = 9 8 4 . 2 8 1 0 0 - Y R B - B = 9 8 7 . 8 0 WETLAND 1f HWL = 985.07 POND 3 HWL = 990.80 FOREBAY (13P) BTM = 979.00 NWL = 986.00 HWL = 987.66 BLK 3 OUTLOT B 1 40' BR O O K V I E W LA N E OUTLOT EOUTLOT E CABX OE OE G G G G G G G G G G G G > > > > > > > > > > I I I I I I I I I I I I I > I 33 33 33 3333 33 468.00 46 8 . 0 0 59 0 . 0 0 980. 6 980.6 ST-11 EL=997.4 ST-12EL=990.2 ST-13 EL=991.7 ST-14 EL=988.3 ST-15 EL=989.0 ST-16 EL=990.5 980.6 98 0 . 6 98 1 . 5 981.5 981.5 981.5 > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> >> SAN SAN >> >> >> >>>> > > > > > > SA N >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > 8" WAT. 8" WAT . 8" W A T . 8" W A T . 8" W A T . 8" WAT. 8" W A T . 8" W A T . 8" W A T . SAN SAN SAN SA N SAN S A N SA N SAN SA N SA N SAN 8" W A T . 8" W A T . 8" W A T . >> 12" WA T . 12" WAT. >> >> MH 2 STUB 8" WATER CO N N E C T W I T H CO N S T R U C T I O N OF C H I P P A W A R O A D FES 1202A CBMH 1202CBMH 1203 FES 1203A FES 1200 OCS 5 FES 5 FES 1802 FES 1800 STMH 1801 FES 1314 CB 1313 CBMH 1312 CB 1311A CBMH 1311CBMH 1301 FES 1300 STMH 1302 CBMH 1303 CBMH 1304 CBMH 1305 CB 1305A CB 1503B CBMH 1503 CB 1503A CBMH 1502 FES 1500 CBMH 1501 CBMH 1501A CB 1501B FES 1601 FES 1600 BOX CULVERT 1 BOX CULVERT 2 BOX CULVERT 3 BOX CULVERT 4 BOX CULVERT 5 MH 33 MH 32 MH 34 MH 35 MH 36 MH 31 MH 30 MH 38 MH 37 MH 29 MH 28 MH 27 MH 26 OCS 7 FES 7 OCS 6FES 6 OCS 8 FES 8 STMH 1201 CIRC L E LEAPING DEER HILLSIDE DR I V E BR O O K V I E W C O U R T CHIPPEWA ROAD FES 10 OCS 10 RCH RCH RCH RCH 2021-08-16 2021-09-23 2021-11-08 2022-02-02 PROJECT NO. FILE NAME LA N D F O R M c IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. PROJECT CERTIFICATION 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 Web: landform.net Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY DEVELOPER MUNICIPALITY WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA SOUTH MEDINA, MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 02.02.2022 MEH17003 20 2 2 MARK SMITH 2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 TEL (612) 490-0558 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request. Randall C. Hedlund License No:Date: CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL CITY REVIEW COMMENTS REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #1 DATED 09.14.21 REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #2 DATED 12.09.21 NORTH 0 100 200 C400MEH003.dwg UTILITY SCHEMATIC /UTILITY NOTES/ SERVICE & STORM SCHEDULE C4.0 STORM SEWER SCHEDULE NUMBER DIAM.CASTING DETAIL SERVICE SCHEDULE (SOUTH) STMH 1201 CBMH 1202 CBMH 1203 CBMH 1301 (SUMP) CBMH 1311 CB 1311A CBMH 1312 CBMH 1313 STMH 1302 CBMH 1303 CBMH 1304 CBMH 1305 CB 1305A CBMH 1501A CB 1501B CBMH 1502 CBMH 1503 CB 1503A CB 1503B STMH 1801 FES 1200 FES 1202A FES 1203A FES 1300 FES 1314 FES 1500 FES 1600 FES 1601 FES 1800 FES 1802 FES 5 FES 6 FES 7 FES 8 OCS 5 OCS 6 OCS 7 OCS 8 48" 48" 48" 48" 2'x3' 2'x3' 2'x3' 2'x3' CBMH 1501 2'x3' 2'x3' 2'x3' 2'x3' 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48" 18" RCP APRON 15" RCP APRON 15" RCP APRON 21" RCP APRON 18" RCP APRON 21" RCP APRON 12" RCP APRON 12" RCP APRON 15" RCP APRON 12" RCP APRON 15" RCP APRON 12" RCP APRON 12" RCP APRON 12" RCP APRON R-1642-B R-1642-B R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-1642-B R-3067-V R-3067-V R-3067-V R-3067-V GALVANIZED GALVANIZED GALVANIZED GALVANIZED NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA STO-8 &9 STO-8 &9 STO-8 &9 STO-8 &9 STO-8 &9 STO-8 &9 STO-8 &9 STO-8 &9 STO-8 &9 STO-8 STO-8 STO-8 STO-8 STO-8 &9 STO-1 STO-1 STO-1 STO-4 STO-4 STO-4 STO-04 STO-4 STO-4 STO-4 STO-4 STO-4 STO-4 STO-05 STO-04 STO-04 STO-04 STO-05 STO-05 STO-05 STO-5 C7.6/1 C7.6/2 C7.6/3 C7.6/4 OCS 10 48"GALVANIZED C7.6/5 UTILITY SCHEMATIC (SOUTH)1 Denotes 4" rigid insulation Pipe Materials Watermain 6" DIP Class 52-Hydrant Leads, 8" PVC C900 & 12" PVC C900 -Main Lines (ANSI A21.51/AWWA C151) Water Service 1" Copper Type K (ASTM B88) Curb Stop shall be adjusted to an elevation of 2" below finished grade. See detail SER-01. Sanitary Sewer 8" PVC SDR 35 (ASTM: D3034, D2665, & F891) Sanitary Sewer Service 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 (ASTM: D1785, D3034, D2665, & F891) Storm Sewer RCP 12"-18" CLASS 5 (ASTM C76) RCP 21" CLASS 4 (ASTM C76) RCP 24"-48" CLASS 3 (ASTM C76) Draintile 6" Perforated Polyethylene HDPE (ASTM F667), PVC (ASTM D2729) 1' Behind Curb with a 6"x4" Tee & 4" PVC To Property Line For Home Sump Pump Connection. See C7.4/5. Contact Utility Service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning. Contractor to field verify location and elevation of all utility points of connection prior to construction of any proposed utilities. Contractor to notify Engineer immediately if there is any discrepancy. Contractor to pothole all utility crossings prior to construction of new utilities to verify depths of existing lines. Contact Engineer immediately if any conflicts are discovered. Provide means and measures to protect adjacent property from damage during utility installation. Pipe lengths shown are from center of structure to center of structure or end of end section. Install tracer wire with all non-conductive utilities in accordance with City of Medina Standards. Connect to City Utilities in accordance with City of Medina Standards. Contact Steve Scherer, City of Medina Public Works Department, at 763.473.8842 for Wet Tap inspection. Maintain 7.5 Feet of cover on water. Deflect water to maintain 18-inch minimum outside separation at sewer crossings. Center pipe lengths to provide greatest separation between joints. Contact Steve Scherer, City of Medina Public Works Department, at 763.473.8842 for flushing and pressure test inspections. All joints and connections in the storm sewer system shall be gastight or water tight. Approved resilient rubber joints must be used to make watertight connections to manholes, catch basins, and other structures. Catch basins in curb and gutter are sumped 2 inches below the gutter grade. Refer to Detail STR-03 & STR-04 on Sheet C7.X. Irrigation sleeve to be 4" Schedule 80 PVC buried 24" below grade. Extend sleeves 3' beyond the edge of pavement. Mark each end of sleeve with 3/4" rebar 12" below finish grade. (coordinate with irrigation contractor.) Compact cohesive soils in paved areas to 95% of maximum dry density, Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) except the top 3 feet which shall be compacted to 100%. compact to 98% density where fill depth exceeds 10 feet. The soils shall be within 3% of optimum moisture content. In granular soils all portions of the embankment shall be compacted to not less than 95% of Modified Proctor Density (ASTM D1557). Adjust structures to final grade where disturbed. Comply with requirements of Utility. Meet requirements for traffic loading in paved areas. Reserved Coordinate with private utilities to provide electric, natural gas, and communications services. The City of Medina shall not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that are associated with variations in the utility as-built elevations. All utility connections shall be verified in the field. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The Owner and Engineer of Record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards. All watermain and sanitary sewer testing shall be done in accordance with the City of Medina standards and specifications. Copies of all test results shall be submitted to the City (Public Works Director, City Engineer), the Owner, and the Engineer of Record. Televise sanitary sewer following installation per City guidelines 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. GENERAL NOTES UTILITY NOTES For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1. 1.TOP NUT HYDRANT, 725 FEET ± FROM THE CENTERLINES INTERSECTION OF THE WESTBOUND LANE OF TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 55 AND MOHAWK DRIVE. WEST SIDE OF MOWHAWK DRIVE. ELEVATION = 998.180 2.TOP NUT HYDRANT, NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF CHIPPAWA ROAD AND HACKAMORE DRIVE. ELEVATION = 1007.372 BENCHMARK >> OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G OTV G OT V >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 980.6 980. 6 980. 6 980. 6 980. 6 980. 6 980 . 6 980.6 408409 435437 442 454455 456 463 486 487 498 499 500 501502503 504 505 506 515516517 518 525 531 536 537 538539 544 545 552 576 592593 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 410 411 412413 414415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427428429430 431 432 433 434 436438 439440 441 443444 445 446447 448 449 450451 452453 457458 459 460 461 462 464465 466 467 468 469470 471 472473 474475476 477 478 479 480 481482 483 484 485 488489 490 491 492 493494 495 496497 507508 509510 511 512513 514 519 520521 522 523 524 526 527 528 529 530 532533 534535 540 541 542 543 546 547 548 549 550 551 553 554555 556 557 558 559 560561 562 563 564 565566 567 568569 570 571 572 573 574 575 577 578 579 580581 582583 584585 586 587 588589 590 591 594 595596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616617 618 619620 621 622623624 625626 627 628 > 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811812813814 815 816817 818819 820821 822823 824 825826827 828 829 830 831832833 834 835 836837838 839 840 843844845 846847 848849 850 851 852853 854 858 859860 861 862 863864 871 872 873 874 875 876877878 879 880881882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906907908 909 910 911912 913 914915 916 917 918 919 920921 922 923 924 925926927928 929 930 931 932 933934 935 936937938 939 940941942943 944 945946 947948949 950 951 952 953 954955 956 960 961 962963 981 1003 1004100510061007 10081009 1010 1011 10121013 1014 1015 1016 10171018 10191020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1040 1041 1042 1049 1050 1061 1063 1065 1066 1090 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 11051106 11071108 1109 1110 1111 1114 1115111611171118 1122 1123 1124 1127 1128 1129113011311132 1133 1134 1135 11361137 113811391140 1141 114211431144114511461147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 115711581159 1385 ST-11 EL=997.4 ST-12EL=990.2 ST-13 EL=991.7 ST-14 EL=988.3 ST-15 EL=989.0 ST-16 EL=990.5 1535 15361537 15381539 1540 1541 15421543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 154915501551 1552155315541555155615571558 1559 15601561 1562 1563 15641565 1566 1567 1568 1611 1612 1613 16141615 16881689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 16971698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 17041705 1706 1707 170817091710 1711 1712 17131714 17151716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 17221723 17241725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 17311732 1733 17341735 1736 1737 1738 17391740 1741 1774 1775 1776 17771778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 179817991800 18011802 18031804 1805 1806 18071808 18091810 1811 18121813 1814 1815 18161817 1818 1819 18201821 1822 1824 1825 1826182718281829 1830 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 18741875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 18831884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907190819091910 1911 19121913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 19241925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931193219331934 1935 19361937193819391940 194119421943 1944 1945 19461947 19481949 1950 1960 19611962 1963 1964 1965 19661967 1968 1969 19701971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 19821983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 19921993 1994 1995 1996 19971998 1999 2000 20012002 20032004 2005 20062007 200820092010 2011201220132014 2015 20162017 2018 2019 202020212022 20232024 2025 202620272028 202920302031 2032 20332034 20352036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 204220432044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 20522053 2054 2055 20562057 2058 2059 2060 206120622063 2064 2065 2066 206720682069 2070 2071 2072 2073 20742075 2076 2077 2078 2079 2080 20812082 2083 2084 208520862087 2088 2089 20902091 980.6 98 0 . 6 980. 6 9 8 0 . 6 981 . 5 98 1 . 5 981. 5 98 1 . 5 981.5 981.5 9 8 1 . 5 981.5 9 8 1 . 5 4 THOC 1 LALA 3 PIGL 1 ABBA 1 LALA 1 ABBA 3 PIGL 3 ABBA 2 PIGL 2 ABBA3 PIGL1 PIST 6 PIGL 3 PIGL 1 LALA 2 PIST 3 ABBA 1 LALA 1 LALA 1 PIGL 1 ABBA 2 LALA 3 THOC 3 PIGL 4 THOC 10 PIGL (3) PIST (4) ABBA (3) PIST (4) ABBA (3) PIST (2) ABBA STS >> STS >> STS >> ST S >> STS >> STS >> STS>>STS>>STS>> ST S >> ST S ST S >> S T S > > S T S > > S T S > > ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> STS >>STS >>STS >> ST S >> STS >>STS >>STS >> ST S >> >> OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G OTV G OT V >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 980.6 980. 6 980. 6 980. 6 980. 6 980. 6 980 . 6 980.6 408409 435437 442 454455 456 463 486 487 498 499 500 501502503 504 505 506 515516517 518 525 531 536 537 538539 544 545 552 576 592593 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 410 411 412413 414415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427428429430 431 432 433 434 436438 439440 441 443444 445 446447 448 449 450451 452453 457458 459 460 461 462 464465 466 467 468 469470 471 472473 474475476 477 478 479 480 481482 483 484 485 488489 490 491 492 493494 495 496497 507508 509510 511 512513 514 519 520521 522 523 524 526 527 528 529 530 532533 534535 540 541 542 543 546 547 548 549 550 551 553 554555 556 557 558 559 560561 562 563 564 565566 567 568569 570 571 572 573 574 575 577 578 579 580581 582583 584585 586 587 588589 590 591 594 595596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616617 618 619620 621 622623624 625626 627 628 > 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811812813814 815 816817 818819 820821 822823 824 825826827 828 829 830 831832833 834 835 836837838 839 840 843844845 846847 848849 850 851 852853 854 858 859860 861 862 863864 871 872 873 874 875 876877878 879 880881882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906907908 909 910 911912 913 914915 916 917 918 919 920921 922 923 924 925926927928 929 930 931 932 933934 935 936937938 939 940941942943 944 945946 947948949 950 951 952 953 954955 956 960 961 962963 981 1003 1004100510061007 10081009 1010 1011 10121013 1014 1015 1016 10171018 10191020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1040 1041 1042 1049 1050 1061 1063 1065 1066 1090 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 11051106 11071108 1109 1110 1111 1114 1115111611171118 1122 1123 1124 1127 1128 1129113011311132 1133 1134 1135 11361137 113811391140 1141 114211431144114511461147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 115711581159 1385 ST-11 EL=997.4 ST-12EL=990.2 ST-13 EL=991.7 ST-14 EL=988.3 ST-15 EL=989.0 ST-16 EL=990.5 1535 15361537 15381539 1540 1541 15421543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 154915501551 1552155315541555155615571558 1559 15601561 1562 1563 15641565 1566 1567 1568 1611 1612 1613 16141615 16881689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 16971698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 17041705 1706 1707 170817091710 1711 1712 17131714 17151716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 17221723 17241725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 17311732 1733 17341735 1736 1737 1738 17391740 1741 1774 1775 1776 17771778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 179817991800 18011802 18031804 1805 1806 18071808 18091810 1811 18121813 1814 1815 18161817 1818 1819 18201821 1822 1824 1825 1826182718281829 1830 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 18741875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 18831884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907190819091910 1911 19121913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 19241925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931193219331934 1935 19361937193819391940 194119421943 1944 1945 19461947 19481949 1950 1960 19611962 1963 1964 1965 19661967 1968 1969 19701971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 19821983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 19921993 1994 1995 1996 19971998 1999 2000 20012002 20032004 2005 20062007 200820092010 2011201220132014 2015 20162017 2018 2019 202020212022 20232024 2025 202620272028 202920302031 2032 20332034 20352036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 204220432044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 20522053 2054 2055 20562057 2058 2059 2060 206120622063 2064 2065 2066 206720682069 2070 2071 2072 2073 20742075 2076 2077 2078 2079 2080 20812082 2083 2084 208520862087 2088 2089 20902091 980.6 98 0 . 6 980. 6 9 8 0 . 6 981 . 5 98 1 . 5 981. 5 98 1 . 5 981.5 981.5 9 8 1 . 5 981.5 9 8 1 . 5 OUTLOT A OUTLOT B 1 2 3 4 56 7 8 BLK 2 6 5 3 4 2 1 7 8 432 3 1 2 1 4 2 3 BLK 6 BLK 4 BLK 5 1 1 2 3 45 6 7 8 9 10 9 5 BLK 1 4 FILTRATION BASIN (16P) POND (18P) IRRIGATION POND (20P) POND (14P) PROPOSED 100-YR HWL = 981.94 OUTLOT C WET 1h WET 4 WETLAND 5b W E T 5 a WETLAND 1fPOND 3 OUTLOT D FOREBAY (13P) BLK 3 OUTLOT B 40' BR O O K V I E W LA N E OUTLOT EOUTLOT E STS >> STS >> STS >> ST S >> STS >> STS >> STS>>STS>>STS>> ST S >> ST S ST S >> S T S > > S T S > > S T S > > ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> ST S >> STS >>STS >>STS >> ST S >> STS >>STS >>STS >> ST S >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.0% 2.0% > > > 2.0 % 2. 0 % 2. 0 % > > W RE U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E RE U S E IR R I G A T I O N LI N E RE U S E IR R I G A T I O N LIN E REU S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E RE U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E RE U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E RE U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E RE U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E REUSE IRRIGATION LINE RE U S E I R R I G A T I O N L I N E IRRIGATION FILTRATION AND PUMP HOUSE AND BACKUP WELL L7.1 4 Wetland Sign (Typ.) L7.1 4 Wetland Sign (Typ.) TREES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME MATURE SIZE PLANTING SIZE ROOT COND. 84 Overstory Tree 60`H x 30`W 2"Cal B & B 17 Privacy and Boulevard Tree 60`H x 40`W 2"Cal B & B EVERGREEN TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME MATURE SIZE PLANTING SIZE ROOT COND. ABBA 23 Abies balsamea / Balsam Fir 60`H x 30`W 6` Ht.B & B LALA 7 Larix laricina / Tamarack 70`H x 50`W 6` Ht.B & B PIGL 34 Picea glauca / White Spruce 50`H x 20`W 6` Ht.B & B PIST 12 Pinus strobus / Eastern White Pine 70` H x 40` W 6` Ht.B & B THOC 7 Thuja occidentalis / American Arborvitae 40`H x 15`W 6` Ht.B & B PLANT SCHEDULE SOUTH-BUFFER REUSE IRRIGATION LINE NORTH 0 100 200 RCH RCH RCH RCH 2021-08-16 2021-09-23 2021-11-08 2022-02-02 PROJECT NO. FILE NAME LA N D F O R M c IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. PROJECT CERTIFICATION 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 Web: landform.net Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY DEVELOPER MUNICIPALITY WESTON WOODS OF MEDINA SOUTH MEDINA, MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 02.02.2022 MEH17003 20 2 2 MARK SMITH 2120 OTTER LAKE DRIVE SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 TEL (612) 490-0558 CD's FOR FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL CITY REVIEW COMMENTS REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #1 DATED 09.14.21 REV. PER CITY REVIEW COMMENTS #2 DATED 12.09.21 L201MEH003.dwg LANDSCAPE PLAN SOUTH L2.1 Contact Utility Service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning. Coordinate installation with Contractors performing related work. Seed mixture (BWSR Mesic Short Urban South and West) as defined by the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources. Native Seeds shall be of Minnesota origin and certified by the Minnesota Crop Improvement Association (MCIA). Provide verifying documentation to the Owner 30 days minimum prior to installation. Plant material shall conform to the American Association of Nurserymen Standards and be of hardy stock, free from disease, infestation, damage, and disfiguration. For discrepancy between the number of plants on the Schedule and the number shown on the Drawing, the Drawing shall govern. All existing deciduous/coniferous trees are to be trimmed of dead wood and pruned to a natural uniform shape. Planting soil shall consist of 4 parts topsoil to 1 part peat humus, with 3 pounds of commercial fertilizer added per cubic yard. Spread a minimum of 4 inches of topsoil and seed/sod all turf areas disturbed by Construction. Protective fencing should be installed around all planted trees. See L7.1 sheet for Detail. Follow MNDOT Seeding Manual for planting instructions for establishment of native seed and provide coordination for required erosion prevention and sediment control. Install a 4-foot diameter shredded hardwood mulch dish around trees not placed within a Shrub or Perennial Planting Bed. Vinyl edging is not required, unless noted otherwise. In-ground irrigation systems may not connect to city water, they must connect to pond or well water. All disturbed areas in the wetland buffers must be restored with native vegetation, and restoration must be maintained and replanted as needed for a duration of not less than the first two full growing seasons after planting. Wetland buffer signs to be installed at a minimum one per lot, on all common lot lines, and placed every 250' thereafter. Sod areas from back of curb to 20' beyond building footprint, provide turf seed (MNDOT 25-151 Residential Turf) for all other turf areas. The Site should be mulched and disc-anchored following packing using MnDOT Type 3 weed free mulch, at a rate of 2.0 tons per acre. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. GENERAL NOTES LANDSCAPE NOTES LANDSCAPE R1 - R3 LANDSCAPE - BUFFER YARDS Area E F G H Proposed Developement R3 R3 R1 R1 R1 Required Buffer Yard Opacity 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 Width of Buffer Yard 25 20 30 20 20 Minimum Planting Points per 100 Lineal Feet 68 173 252 320 73 Length of Buffer Yard 457' 223' 431' 432' 546' Total Points Required 311 385 1086 1382 399 Total Overstory Trees Provided (50 planting points each) 17 8 22 28 8 Total Medium Deciduous / Coniferous Trees Provided (20 planting Points each) 0 0 0 0 0 E F G H LEGEND Adjacent District Comm R2 R3 R3 R2 BWSR Mesic Short Urban South and West 45.95 lbs/acre PLANT SCHEDULE E E H G GF II Irrigation Line 13. 13. (Typ) 13. (Typ) 13. (Typ) I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request. Joshua K. Popehn License No:Date: H I HIG H W A Y 5 5 MO H A W K D R I V E BRO O K V I E W C O U R T HIL L S I D E D R I V E LEAPING DEER LANE CHIPPEWA ROAD 14. 15. 14. 15. 14. Wetland Buffer Wetland Buffer Wetland Buffer Wetland Buffer 14. 15. (Typ) (Typ) Wetland Buffer Wetland Buffer 14. Wetland Buffer 14. Wetland Boundary This Landscape Plan has been developed to meet three landscaping requirements as defined by code: (A) Lot landscaping for R-1, R-2, R-3 zoning, (B) Buffer Yards, and (C) Privacy and Boulevard Trees. For construction Staking and Surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070. 1. 2. A B C R-1 Zoning - tree locations have been provided as a guide for required landscaping at the time of home construction. A generic tree symbol is used in these instances. Tree species selection for these must conform with the provided list. No species should comprise more than 25% of the total planting. Buffer Yards - tree locations and species have been provided to conform with City calculations and requirements. Any modifications to this plan must be approved by the City of Medina at the time of building permit. Privacy and Boulevard Trees - tree locations have been provided for additional privacy and boulevard trees. Tree species selection for these must conform with the provided list. No species should comprise more than 25% of the total planting. C (Typ) Limits of Disturbance Delineated Wetland Limits of Disturbance Silt Fence Wetland Buffer 15. (Typ) Limits of Disturbance Silt Fence 14. Delineated Wetland Delineated Wetland Wetland Buffer Limits of Grading Provide sod from back of curb to 20' behind building footprint. For other turf areas seed with mix: MNDOT 25-151 Residential Turf (120 lbs/acre) ACCEPTABLE TREE SPECIES SELECTION Deciduous Trees Ash, Black (Fraxinus nigra) Aspen, bigtooth (Populus grandidentata) Aspen, quaking (Populus tremuloides) Basswood, American (Tilia americana) Birch, paper (Betula papyrifera) Birch, river (Betula nigra) Birch, yellow (Betula alleghaniensis) Cherry pin (Prunus pensylvanica) Elm, American (Ulmus americana)* Hickory, bitternut (Carya cordiformis) Honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos) Hornbeam, American (Carpinus caroliniana) Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana) Maple, Sugar (Acer saccharum) Maple, Red (Acer rubrum) *cultivars resistant to Dutch Elm Disease Coniferous Trees Cedar, Northern White (Thuja occidentalis) Fir, Balsam (Abies balsamea) Spruce, White (Picea glauca) Pine, Eastern White (Pinus strobus) Oak, Red (Quercus rubra) Oak, White (Quercus alba) Oak, Bur (Quercus macrocarpa) Oak, Swamp White (Quercus bicolor) Walnut, Black (Salix nigra) 16. 16. (Typ) 16.(Typ) 16. (Typ) 16. This area represents the final condition of the plan approved during Preliminary Plat. The layout may change based on final product. A. (Typ) A. (Typ) A. (Typ) MNDOT 25-131 Low Maintenance Turf 220 lbs/acre 17. 17. (Typ) 17. (Typ) 17. (Typ) 5.4 Acres / 250 lbs seed Sod = 6.2 Acres Seed = 4.2 Acres / 498 lbs seed 0.3 Acres / 55 lbs seed Quantity MnDOT Type 3 weed free mulch will be used for erosion control and stabilization on all seeded areas 2.0 tons per acre17.9.8 Acres total seeded area / 20 tons mulch Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial Page 1 of 2 April 5, 2022 Environmental Assessment Worksheet City Council Meeting TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: March 30, 2022 MEETING: April 5, 2022 City Council SUBJECT: Loram and Scannell Medina Industrial – Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) – Proposed Commercial/Industrial Development – PIDs 11-118-23-22-0003 and 11-118-23-23-0001 Background Scannell Properties and Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc., have submitted an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) related to potential development of approximately 450,000 square feet of warehouse/office/light industrial buildings on approximately 25 acres east of Arrowhead Drive, south of Highway 55. The applicants have indicated that Loram would occupy the northern building to expand their operations in Medina and that the parties intend to lease the other two buildings. The subject property is guided for business development in the current staging and growth period. Chapter 4410 of Minnesota Rules regulates Environmental Review and requires mandatory completion of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for development of 300,000 square feet or more of warehouse/light industrial space within a city of Medina’s size. The Rules establish the City as the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) for this type of EAW. The City Council authorized distribution of the EAW on February 2 and the 30-day comment period expired on March 17. The City is now responsible to review comments from the public and other agencies, to respond to the comments as necessary, and to make a determination on whether or not additional environmental review is necessary via an Environmental Impact Statement. During the comment period, the City received ten written comments from the following agencies: • Hennepin County • Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission • State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) • Metropolitan Council • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) • Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) MEMORANDUM Agenda Item #7D Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial Page 2 of 2 April 5, 2022 Environmental Assessment Worksheet City Council Meeting • Minnesota Department of Agriculture • Minnesota Department of Administration State Archaeologist • Minnesota Indian Affairs Council None of the agencies suggested that an EIS is necessary to complete. Staff believes the comments from Hennepin County and Elm Creek Watershed are the most significant. The comments are exhibits to the draft Findings of Fact and Record of Decision (FOF/ROD) which is attached for City Council review and approval. Staff has included draft responses to the comments within the FOF/ROD. Processing the EAW as required by state Rules does not bind the City’s decisions on subsequent land use requests. The City retains discretion when ultimately making decisions on relevant land use applications. The City’s determination on whether an EIS is required does not limit the City’s decision-making land use requests. The comments and report from the EAW will be one component considered during future land use applications. Staff Recommendation After preparing the EAW and reviewing and preparing responses to comments, staff does not believe the project meets the criteria for requiring an EIS as described in state rules. The project would be subject to review by various agencies if it were to proceed with final design, and staff believes the regulatory process would provide adequate opportunity for review and implementation of appropriate mitigative measures. As such, staff recommends the following actions: 1. Motion to approve the Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial EAW Findings of Fact and Record of Decision 2. Motion to adopt the resolution approving the response to comments, findings of fact, and record of decision for the Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial EAW and making a negative declaration upon the need for an Environmental Impact Statement Attachment 1. Draft Findings of Fact and Record of Decision 2. Draft Resolution Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 1 LORAM / SCANNELL INDUSTRIAL Findings of Fact and Record of Decision City of Medina March 2022 Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 2 1. Administrative Background Scannell Properties is proposing to redevelop an approximately 25-acre site located south of MN 55 and east of Arrowhead Drive (CR 118) in Medina. The proposed project consists of a total of approximately 10 acres of office/warehouse uses and would include new water service, sewer, stormwater, streets, and utilities. All of these new services would be extensions to existing infrastructure or upgrading existing systems to support the new development. The City of Medina is the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) for this project. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) has been prepared in accordance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410. The EAW was mandatory per Minnesota Rules, part 4410.4300, subpart 14: Industrial, commercial, and institutional facilities. The EAW was filed with the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) and circulated for review and comment to the required distribution list. A notice of availability was published in the EQB Monitor on February 15, 2022. This notice included a description of the project, information on where copies of the EAW were available, and invited the public to provide comments. The EAW was made available electronically on the City of Medina’s website at https://medinamn.us/lorameaw/. The EAW comment period extended from February 15 to March 17, 2022. Written comments were received from ten agencies. All comments received were considered in determining the potential for significant environmental impacts. Based on the information in the record, which is composed of the EAW for the proposed project, the comments submitted during the public comment period, the responses to comments, and other supporting documents, the City of Medina makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions. Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 3 2. Findings of Fact 2.1 Project Description The Loram / Scannell Medina Industrial project is located south of MN 55 and east of Arrowhead Drive (CR 118) in Medina. The site consists of two parcels and approximately 25 acres agricultural land. There are no existing buildings or structures within the site. The proposed project consists of a total of approximately 10 acres of office/warehouse uses and would include new water service, sewer, stormwater, streets, and utilities. All of these new services would be extensions to existing infrastructure or upgrading existing systems to support the new development. 2.2 Corrections to the EAW or Changes to the Project since the EAW was Published There have been no changes to the proposed project design since the EAW was published. 2.3 Agency and Public Comments on the EAW During the comment period, the City of Medina received ten written comments from the following agencies: • State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) • Metropolitan Council • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) • Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) • Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission • Minnesota Department of Agriculture • Minnesota Department of Administration State Archaeologist • Hennepin County • Minnesota Indian Affairs Council Consistent with state environmental rules, responses have been prepared below for all substantive comments received during the comment period. Original comments in their entirety are included in Appendix A. 1) State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), March 15, 2022 Comment: “Based on our review of the project information, we conclude that there are no properties listed in the National or State Registers of Historic Places, and no known or suspected archaeological properties in the area that will be affected by this project. However, according to the Office of the State Archaeologist’s site inventory portal, there is a burial mound site identified in the project vicinity. We recommend that you consult with the Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA) and the Minnesota Indian Affairs Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 4 Council (MIAC) due to the presence of this site, per Sec. 307.08 of the Minnesota Private Cemeteries Act. Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36 CFR § 800. If this project is considered for federal financial assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, then review and consultation with our office will need to be initiated by the lead federal agency. Be advised that comments and recommendations provided by our office for this state-level review may differ from findings and determinations made by the federal agency as part of review and consultation under Section 106. Please contact Kelly Gragg-Johnson, Environmental Review Program Specialist, at kelly.graggjohnson@state.mn.us if you have any questions regarding our review of this project.” Response: Comment noted. Per the additional comments from the OSA, the proposer intends to complete a Phase I archeological reconnaissance survey prior to development. 2) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), March 16, 2022 Comment: “Permits and Approvals (Item 8) Table 3 lists both a Construction Site Stormwater Permit and a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit as required from MPCA. The Project proposer will likely need only the NPDES/SDS General Construction Stormwater Permit (CSW Permit) from the MPCA. Response: Comment noted. Comment: “Water Resources (Item 11) The intended stormwater management plans are not clear in the EAW. The EAW states that stormwater ponding will be utilized but also states infiltration will be used to reduce stormwater quantity when feasible, including use of above ground rain gardens and water reuse and underground filtration. The CSW Permit requires use of volume reduction practices to manage stormwater unless prohibited for reasons specified in the CSW Permit. Possible volume reduction practices include raingardens or bioinfiltration areas. Also, infiltration trenches or tree boxes could be utilized within the parking areas and pervious pavements to reduce stormwater volume. Underground filtration is not considered a volume reduction practice. The Project proposer could also consider green roofs or the stormwater reuse mentioned in the EAW. If additional stormwater management is needed to achieve the planned volume reduction of 1.1 inch, then ponding may be necessary.” Response: Comment noted. Infiltration practices will be used throughout the site to reduce stormwater volume when feasible (such as tree boxes in the parking areas), but underground filtration is proposed due to the Lean Clay found on site. This clay provides an extremely low infiltration rate, and the CSW Permit states that infiltration practices shall not be used in these clay soils. In lieu of a volume reduction of 1.1 inch, filtration practices are proposed such that the 1.1 Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 5 inch of runoff over the site’s impervious area is treated through a section of engineered sand media Comment: “Water Resources (Item 11) If stormwater ultimately discharges to Elm Creek, which has a construction-related impairment, then additional stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are required during construction that are not mentioned in the EAW. These include stabilizing inactively worked soils within 7 days and providing a temporary sediment basin for 5 or more acres draining to a common location. These requirements must be specified in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the Project.” Response: Comment noted. A SWPPP will be submitted to the MPCA and BMPs will be described in the SWPPP. Comment: “Water Resources (Item 11) Any soil disturbance within 50 feet of the wetlands on the site will require that redundant (double) downgradient sediment control BMPs are installed to keep sediment from entering the wetlands. Questions regarding Construction Stormwater Permit requirements should be directed to Roberta Getman at 507-206-2629 or Roberta.Getman@state.mn.us.” Response: Comment noted. Redundant down gradient sediment controls will be installed if the construction must encroach the existing 50 feet of natural buffer to the wetlands. This measure will be included in the SWPPP. Comment: “Noise (Item 17) The Project will need to conform with state noise standards during operation. Any operation noise levels would need to meet the Noise Area Classification (NAC) 1 standards by the time sound reaches the neighboring residential properties. For residential locations (NAC 1), the limits are L10 = 65 dBA and L50 = 60 dBA during the daytime (7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m.) and L10 = 55 dBA and L50 = 50 dBA during the nighttime (10:00 p.m. – 7:00 a.m.) (Minn. R. 7030.0040). This means that during a one-hour period of monitoring, daytime noise levels cannot exceed 65 dBA for more than 10 percent of the time (six minutes) and cannot exceed 60 dBA more than 50 percent of the time (30 minutes). For noise related questions, please contact Maggie Wenger at 651-757-2007 or Maggie.Wenger@state.mn.us.” Response: Comment noted. 3) Metropolitan Council, March 16, 2022 Comment: “Item 9 – Planned Land Use (Todd Graham, 651-602-1322) The EAW discusses a development with approximately 449,000 square feet of office/warehouse floorspace in three buildings; the buildings would cover approximately 40% of the total site. Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 6 The EAW site is a small part of Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) #912 on the southside of Highway 55. At this time, the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan expects TAZ #912 to gain +427 jobs during 2020-2040. This is a reasonable expectation as the Loram/Scannell development is the only new development in this neighborhood. If a greater level of employment is expected in this zone, please request a TAZ allocation adjustment by contacting Council Research.” Response: The City will continue to monitor growth and will coordinate with the Metropolitan Council regarding the TAZ forecasts for the area and a comprehensive plan amendment, if needed. Comment: “Item 11 – Water Resources - Wastewater (Roger Janzig, 651-602-1122) The Metropolitan Disposal System has adequate capacity for this project location.” Response: Comment noted. Comment: “Item 11 – Stormwater (Maureen Hoffman, 651-602-1279) The proposed site plan provided (Attachment A) did not contain a legend. On the site plan it appears that a building is impinging on the northeast wetland. We want to reiterate that the developer continues to work with the City, as the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) authority, and the Elm Creek Watershed District to limit impacts on wetlands. Additionally, stormwater must be pretreated before entering a wetland. The developer noted they will be working with the City as the WCA authority and will be applying for wetland banking credits. We encourage the developer look within the same watershed/subwatershed to do the wetland banking replacement. Finally, since the proposed development is within one mile of Elm Creek, which is impaired, we ask the developer to implement stormwater practices that would minimize negative impacts to the creek.” Response: The site plan is being coordinated with the WCA authority and the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) in order to ensure wetland regulatory requirements are met. Scannell is committed to meeting rules of WCA for wetland banking replacement which would include prioritizing available credits within the major watershed before seeking credits in the broader bank service area. All stormwater runoff on site will be routed to a treatment BMP prior to discharge to wetland. A SWPPP will be developed which will address proposed BMPs intended to minimize negative impacts to the creek. Comment: “Item 18 – Transportation (Victoria Dan, 612-349-7648) The Loram/Scannell development does not presently impact fixed route transit. As the City is aware, the Metropolitan Council in coordination with MnDOT have begun to study the feasibility of potential future bus rapid transit in the Trunk Highway 55 corridor between downtown Minneapolis and Medina. At this stage, it is not clear what impacts, if any, the project may have on the transit feasibility study.” Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 7 Response: Comment noted. Comment: “Item 19 - Cumulative Potential Effects (Eric Wojchik, 651-602-1330) The City’s adopted 2040 Comprehensive Plan states “Medina is committed to encouraging and promoting solar energy as a clean, alternative form of energy production and reducing carbon-based emissions.” Council staff recommend the design and integration of solar panels at this proposed development to serve some portion of the electricity to be consumed by 448,400 square feet of office/warehouse floor space. Council staff recommend using the U.S. National Renewable Energy Lab’s tool “PV Watts” for cross-evaluating solar cost, design, and production (https://pvwatts.nrel.gov/index.php).” Response: Comment noted. 4) Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), March 16, 2022 Comment: “Page 13, Stormwater. Stormwater features may be colonized by Blanding’s turtles (state-listed as threatened) in the area, therefore we recommend incorporating avoidance into stormwater management. In years when the stormwater features will be dredged to remove excess sediment, please draw down water levels by September 15th in order to allow turtles to find overwintering habitat elsewhere.” Response: The City will require this drawdown information to be addressed as part of the stormwater maintenance agreement. Comment: “Page 12, Stormwater. The DNR recommends that water from the stormwater ponds be used for irrigating the landscaping on the site. The use of stormwater from constructed stormwater features does not require a DNR Water Appropriation Permit.” Response: Comment noted. Any landscape irrigation system would be required to be supplied from stormwater ponds as required by City ordinance. Comment: “Page 12, Stormwater. We strongly encourage the development to use weed-free, suitable, native seed mixes and plants in project stormwater features and landscaping in order to provide pollinator habitat. The Board of Soil and Water Resources’ website contains many great resources for choosing seed mixes and establishing native plants.” Response: Comment noted. It is intended that disturbed areas would be reestablished using appropriate native and stabilization seed mixes. Comment: “Page 13, Stormwater. The planned increase in impervious surfaces will also increase the amount of road salt used in the project area. Chloride released into local lakes and streams does not break down, and instead accumulates in the environment, Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 8 potentially reaching levels that are toxic to aquatic wildlife and plants. Consider promoting local business and city participation in the Smart Salting Training offered through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. There are a variety of classes available for road applicators, sidewalk applicators, and property managers. More information and resources can be found at this website. Many winter maintenance staff who have attended the Smart Salting training — both from cities and counties and from private companies — have used their knowledge to reduce salt use and save money for their organizations. We also encourage cities and counties to consider how they may participate in the Statewide Chloride Management Plan and provide public outreach to reduce the overuse of chloride. Here are some educational resources for residents as well as a sample ordinance regarding chloride use.” Response: Comment noted. The project will comply with all city of Medina, Elm Creek Watershed Management, MPCA, county, and state rules for stormwater management, and chloride use will be addressed in the Stormwater Management Plan that will be reviewed by the city for compliance. City public works maintenance staff have completed MPCA Smart Salt training. Comment: “Page 14, Surface Waters. This section states that 3 acres of wetlands will be filled, but Table 2. Cover Types shows that 3 acres of wetlands are present on the site and 1.3 will remain upon completion of the project. The Cover Type section should be updated to reflect the actual amount of wetland impact.” Response: Revisions to the cover types table will be made. Comment: “Page 14, Surface Waters. It appears that wetland impacts are proposed to Unnamed Public Water Wetland (#27048900). Please coordinate with DNR Area Hydrologist, Wes Saunders-Pearce (wes.saunders-pearce@state.mn.us) throughout the WCA process and to determine if a DNR Public Waters Work Permit will be required.” Response: Through coordination with the DNR it was determined that the established Ordinary High Water Mark for the wetland is 988.1 (NAV88 Datum). If any work is proposed at or below this elevation, a DNR Public Waters Work Permit will be obtained. Comment: “Page 18, Rare Features. This section incorrectly states that no Regionally Significant Ecological Areas (RSEA) or DNR Native Plant Communities (NPC) are present within a mile of the project area. Please note that there are multiple RSEA’s in the direct vicinity of the project, including bordering the project area directly to the west. There are also NPC’s documented within the MBS Sites approximately half a mile to the west of the project area.” Response: Figure below has been added which includes RSEAs, and MBS Sites in the vicinity of the site. No specific rare plant communities or species were identified by the DNR within the RSEA or MBS. The study area has been recently Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 9 disturbed by agricultural activities and does not anticipate impacting adjacent parcels. Comment: “Page 19, Impacts to Threatened and Endangered Species. Please note that this comment is a response to your request for concurrence regarding your query of the Natural Heritage Information System. Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii), a state- listed threatened species, have been documented in the vicinity of the proposed project. • Avoid wetland impacts during hibernation season, between October 15th and April 15th, unless the area is unsuitable for hibernation. • The use of erosion control blanket shall be limited to ‘bio-netting’ or ‘natural- netting’ types, and specifically not products containing plastic mesh netting or other plastic components. o Also, be aware that hydro-mulch products may contain small synthetic (plastic) fibers to aid in their matrix strength. These loose fibers could potentially re-suspend and make their way into Public Waters. As such, please review mulch products and not allow any materials with synthetic (plastic) fiber additives in areas that drain to Public Waters. • Areas where there will be construction should be checked for turtles before the use of heavy equipment or any ground disturbance. o The Blanding’s turtle flyer must be given to all contractors working in the area. Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 10 o Monitor for turtles during construction and report any sightings to the DNR Nongame Specialist, Erica Hoaglund at 651-259-5772 or Erica.Hoaglund@state.mn.us. o If turtles are in imminent danger they must be moved by hand out of harm’s way, otherwise, they are to be left undisturbed. If the above avoidance measures are not possible, please contact NHIS Review Specialist, Samantha Bump (Samantha.Bump@state.mn.us). For additional information, see the Blanding’s turtle fact sheet, which describes the habitat use and life history of this species. The fact sheet also provides two lists of recommendations for avoiding and minimizing impacts to this rare turtle. Please refer to both lists of recommendations and apply those that are relevant to your project. For further assistance regarding the Blanding’s turtle, please contact the DNR Regional Nongame Specialist, Erica Hoaglund.” Response: Thank you for the additional information and these avoidance measures will be implemented. Additional avoidance measures outlined in the Blanding’s turtle fact sheet will be incorporated into the site design as practical. 5) Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), March 7, 2022 Comment: “Walking and Biking. Please consider including direct, accessible non- motorized connections from the sidepath along Arrowhead Drive to building entrances in the development. For questions regarding this comment, contact Jesse Thornsen, Metro Multimodal, at Jesse.Thornsen@state.mn.us or 651-234-7788.” Response: Comment noted. Comment: “Permits: Any use of, or work within or affecting, MnDOT right of way will require a permit. Permits can be applied for at this site: https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. Please upload a copy of this letter when applying for any permits. Please direct questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig of MnDOT’s Metro Permits Section at 651-775-0405 or Buck.Craig@state.mn.us.” Response: A MnDOT permit will be applied for if any use of, or work within or affecting, MnDOT right of way. 6) Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, February 16, 2022 Comment: The Elm Creek WMC standards and requirements are addressed in this EAW report. A complete list of the Elm Creek WMC rules and standards can be viewed at Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 11 Application Requirements - Elm Creek Watershed. Site development must meet these stormwater, wetlands, buffers, floodplains, and erosion control standards. Response: The site plan will comply with all City of Medina, Elm Creek Watershed Management, MPCA, county, and state rules for surface water management. Comment: The cumulative effect of increased runoff volume is an emerging issue in the ECWMC due to rapid development and the construction of impervious issues in the watershed. Increased runoff volumes are associated with increased flood risk for our downstream communities. This in turn leads to degradation of channel banks due to increased non-peak flows, aquatic species disturbance due to hydrologic regime changes, and the warming of stormwater runoff. Many of the site soils in Medina have low and very low infiltration potential (high runoff potential). To the extent reasonable, the site design should limit increased annual runoff volume by using best management practices. Response: Comment noted. Per City of Medina Guidelines there is no allowable Increase in runoff rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year storm events. Proposed rates must be equal to or less than existing conditions. Volume control is required at a rate of 1.1 inches of runoff from the net new impervious surface, which is more stringent than state guidelines. Volume control onsite will be maximized to the extent feasible. Refer to the Medina Design Guidelines for Volume control credits when infiltration is not feasible. Comment: This site plan contributes to the trend of highly dense industrial areas that account for major land use and grading impacts to the Elm Creek Watershed. To a large extent wetlands on these parcels are being removed and being replaced with largely impervious surfaces with little or no natural areas remaining. These changes will result in localized habitat loss, disconnection of habitat, warming of runoff, and microclimate impacts. Wetland impacts should be avoided to the extent reasonable. Response: Through Scannell’s commitment to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands on the site, revisions to the site plan are being considered in an effort to reduce wetland impacts. Ultimately, justification for wetland impacts will comply with all local, state, and federal regulations for wetland management. 7) Minnesota Department of Agriculture, March 11, 2022 Comment: “The Minnesota Department of Agriculture thanks you for the opportunity to review the Scoping EAW for the proposed Loram / Scannell Medina Industrial Project. Although we always regret to see the conversion of agricultural land, in particular, prime farmland, to other land uses, we understand the need that cities face in finding suitable locations to meet the demand for development. We also recognize and respect the rights and responsibilities that local units of government have in making appropriate decisions for their residents. As such, we have no comments to make on the EAW.” Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 12 Response: Comment noted. 8) Minnesota Department of Administration State Archaeologist, March 14, 2022 Comment: “I appreciate being given the opportunity to comment on the above listed project. Review of the records at the Office of the State Archaeologist revealed the presence of a previously reported (not field verified) burial site, 21HEag. Therefore, I recommend a qualified archaeologist conduct a phase I reconnaissance survey to determine if the project could damage unrecorded burial or archaeological sites." Response: The proposer will conduct a phase I reconnaissance survey to determine if the project could damage any unrecorded archaeological sites. 9) Hennepin County, March 3, 2022 Comment: “Page 6, Table 2 (Cover Types). In what way has the design team tried to avoid impacts to wetlands and reduce impervious surface on this project? It seems like there would be further opportunities to do so.” Response: Revisions to the site plan are being considered, in coordination with the TEP, in an effort to reduce wetland impacts. The site plan in the EAW currently represents the proposed project and potential impacts. As a member of the TEP, the Hennepin County Soil and Water Conservation District will be able to provide recommendations to the WCA LGU, City of Medina. The proposed impervious surface consists of the building footprint, parking, and access. Parking and access are determined based on the City’s zoning requirements. Comment: “Page 7, Land Use I. Hennepin County supports the creation and preservation of affordable agricultural space for every scale of local food production. While each individual farmland to non-farmland conversion is a private choice, the impacts of the cumulative loss on rural character, diversity of landscapes, open spaces and vistas, as well a local resilience to our changing climate should be considered.” Response: Comment noted. City of Medina strongly supports preserving rural character, vistas and open spaces within the community. Nevertheless, Medina is mandated by the Metropolitan Council to plan for at least a minimum amount of regional growth and development and the City has identified limited areas to provide opportunities for business development and entrepreneurship where there is access to infrastructure to support such uses. Comment: “Page 11, Table 5. This document does not require discussion of winter snow and ice management, however, note that Elm Creek is already impaired for chloride. Winter snow and ice management should be informed by "Smart Salting" techniques to minimize salt use. Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 13 The wetland areas on the east edge of this property feed directly to the already impaired Elm Creek. Reversing water quality impairments will almost certainly require exceeding requirements, especially considering climate change impacts that we are already experiencing. If applicant has an interest in receiving assistance from the county to explore options for going above and beyond stormwater requirements to help improve water quality, reach out to Karen Galles (Karen.Galles@hennepin.us).” Response: Comment noted. Regarding “Smart Salting” techniques, City public works maintenance staff has have completed MPCA Smart Salt training. On-site snow and ice removal will be the responsibility of the developers and they will consider methods to reduce salt usage. Comment: “Page 12, Stormwater II. The western wetland on this property (wetland 8) is likely hydrologically connected to the wetland complex on the Hennepin County Public Works facility across Arrowhead Drive. Impacts to this wetland and drainage west from this project will directly impact Hennepin County's natural resource restoration efforts at our Public Works facility. Again, if applicant would be interested in assistance from the county to exceed project minimum requirements, which in this case would directly benefit county activities and property, please contact Karen Galles (Karen.Galles@hennepin.us). Appreciate the mention of partial on-site wetland mitigation, however, stormwater pretreatment facilities do not have all the same ecological function services as existing wetlands. Avoiding wetland impacts to exis ting wetlands would be preferred. What design alternatives have been considered to avoid additional impacts to the existing wetlands on site? Consider reducing overall impervious surfaces to help improve infiltration potential.” Response: Wetland 8 is a landlocked feature that is surficially separated from the Hennepin County restoration site by Arrowhead Drive. According to survey data collected for the project, there are no pipes under Arrowhead Drive that connect the two resources. The proposed site plan would be required to provide treatment for all stormwater runoff prior to discharge to downstream water. Avoidance and minimization measures for wetland impacts, such as reorienting the site and/or shifting the location of BMPs, are being investigated and will be coordinated through the WCA TEP. Comment: “Page 14, Surface Water IV. Mitigation must occur as close to the project site as possible, and preferably on-site. Mitigation outside of the local watershed (i.e., areas draining to Elm Creek), and certainly outside the County, does little to benefit natural resources for city and county residents. We permitted approximately 76 acres of wetland impacts last year in Hennepin County and only about 16 acres of mitigation bank credits purchased for those acres were in our county. We do appreciate statements expressing good intent to purchase mitigation acres nearby, however, we have a strong preference for avoiding impacts in the first place.” Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 14 Response: Comment noted. Scannell is committed to meeting rules of WCA for wetland banking replacement which would include prioritizing available credits within the major watershed before seeking credits in the broader bank service area. Comment: “Page 17, Section B. Given this, we encourage the proposer to avoid impacts to Wetland 4 and the seasonally flooded portion of Wetland 5.” Response: Comment noted. Through Scannell’s commitment to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands on the site, revisions to the site plan are being considered in an effort to reduce wetland impacts. Ultimately, justification for wetland impacts will comply with all local, state, and federal regulations for wetland management. Comment: “Page 18, Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species. Please consider monarch butterfly habitat when creating landscape plans (e.g., for screening required at western edge of site) and for alternatives to some of the impervious currently planned for the site.” Response: Comment noted. It is intended that disturbed areas would be reestablished using appropriate native and stabilization seed mixes which contain floral resources that would benefit the monarch butterfly. Comment: “Page 18, Section C. Previous page says that the wetland complex to the east of the site could be suitably habitat for trumpeter swans, the project is planning impacts to Wetlands 4 and 5, which are part of that complex.” Response: Comment noted. Through coordination with the TEP, revisions to the site plan are being considered which would minimize impacts to Wetlands 4 and 5. Comment: “Page 22, Transportation. Proposing 449,300 square-ft in building surface area. Medina ordinance requires one space per 2,000 square-ft gross floor area, thusly city only requires 225 stalls. This plan calls for 634 (169 for trucks + 465 for automobiles). Is this much parking essential to success? If planners only anticipate a peak of ~150 cars, why are they proposing a need for 634 stalls? Not clear what amount of occupancy this correlates with. Even if its 50% occupancy there are still twice as many stalls as necessary. Excess parking stalls could be removed, providing more space for onsite wetland mitigation.” Response: The developer will review parking needs based upon the square footage ultimately constructed and projected number of employees. Proof of parking may be implemented to set aside area for parking but not construct such stalls unless it is necessary. Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 15 Comment: “Attachment A, Proposed Site Plan. Could site plan avoid easterly internal driveway and consolidate a single N-S driveway connection to Loram Site? This would be a good way to mitigate wetland impacts and reduce impervious area. If impacting the wetland(s) along Arrowhead Dr frontage, developer should relocate the impacted trail segment to the appropriate offset. The property to the south had to install the trail and since they didn't own this land they avoided impact mitigation. Now is the time to correct this in our opinion. Storm water needs to be managed on-site; no additional flows are allowed into county right-of-way.” Response: Comment noted. Comment: “4.0 Proposed Development, Site Access Circulation. County guidelines based partially on MnDOT, FHWA, etc. best practices recommends turn lanes in both directions for access(es) with these many projected trips. One way to mitigate these needs would be to have the southerly access on Arrowhead Dr to be outbound only (narrowed and signed). This would funnel the predominant inbound movement (especially trucks) into the northerly access closest to Trunk Highway 55 utilizing the existing 4-lane segment for inbound movements.” Response: Turn lane needs will be evaluated based upon final site layout and required if necessary. Comment: “Appendices, PG 18 Traffic Impact Analysis. It is helpful to have these Simtraffic reports in the appendix as it shows what software was used and allows for more in-depth analysis by traffic engineers if needed.” Response: Comment noted. Simtraffic reports were included at the end of Appendix D. 10) Minnesota Indian Affairs Council, March 11, 2022 Comment: “Good afternoon Dusty, I was looking over the EAW, and there is a recorded American Indian burial /alpha site (21HEag) associated with this area. I would recommend an archaeological survey to be done ahead of any ground disturbances to make sure no burials are disturbed. I CC’d Jennifer from the Office of the State Archaeologist on here as well. Let me know if I can be of any help at all, thanks!” Response: Comment noted. The proposer will conduct a phase I reconnaissance survey to determine if the project could damage any unrecorded archaeological sites. Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 16 2.4 Decision Regarding Need for an Environmental Impact Statement The City of Medina finds that the analysis completed for the EAW and the additional information considered in this document of findings of fact and conclusions are adequate to determine whether the project has the potential for significant environmental effects based on consideration of the four criteria identified in Minnesota Rules, part 4410, subpart 7. 2.4.1 Type, Extent and Reversibility of Impacts The City of Medina finds that the analysis completed for the EAW is adequate to determine whether the project has the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW described the type and extent of impacts to the natural and built environment anticipated to result from the proposed project. Based on the EAW analysis and mitigation commitments, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in substantial impacts. Any potential impacts would be subject to and mitigated by ongoing public regulatory authority. 2.4.2 Cumulative Potential Effects of Related or Anticipated Future Projects Cumulative effects result from the incremental impact of the proposed project when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions, regardless of what agency or person undertakes such other actions. 2.4.3 Extent to which the Environmental Effects are Subject to Mitigation by the Ongoing Public Regulatory Authority The mitigation of environmental impacts will be designed and implemented in coordination with regulatory agencies and will be subject to the plan approval and permitting process. Permits and approvals that have been obtained or may be required prior to project construction are shown below: Unit of Government Type of Application Status Local City of Medina Preliminary and Final Plat To be applied for Building Permits To be applied for Sewer and Water Permit To be applied for, if needed Erosion Control, Grading, and Stormwater Permit To be applied for Site Plan Approval To be applied for Right-of-Way permit To be applied for Wetland Conservation Act Replacement Plan Approval To be applied for Hennepin County Access Permit To be applied for Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC) Watershed District Permit To be applied for State Minnesota Department of Health Water Extension Permit To be applied for, if needed Minnesota Pollution Control Agency National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES/SDS) General Construction Stormwater Permit (CSW Permit) To be applied for Section 401 Water Quality Certification To be applied for, if needed Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit To be applied for, if needed Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 17 Unit of Government Type of Application Status Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Water Appropriation Permit To be applied for, if needed Public Waters Work Permit To be applied for, if needed Federal US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit To be applied for, if needed 2.4.4 Extent to which Environmental Effects can be Anticipated and Controlled as a Result of Other Environmental Studies The City finds that the environmental effects of the project can be anticipated and controlled as a result of environmental review, regulatory procedures, and experience on similar projects. Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 18 3. Conclusions 1. All requirements for environmental review of the proposed project have been met. 2. The EAW and the permit development processes related to the project have generated information that is adequate to determine whether the project has the potential for significant environmental effects. 3. Areas where potential environmental effects have been identified will be addressed during the final design of the project. If the project were to proceed, it would be subject to regulatory authority which will be sufficient to implement mitigation necessary to address potential environmental effects. Mitigation will be provided where impacts are expected to result from project construction, operation, or maintenance. Mitigation measures are incorporated into project design and have been or will be coordinated with state and federal agencies during the permit process. 4. Based on the criteria in Minnesota Rules, part 4410.1700, the project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. 5. An environmental impact statement is not required for the proposed project. Loram / Scannell Industrial Finding of Facts and Record of Decision 19 Appendix A Agency Comments MINNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE 50 Sherburne Avenue ▪ Administration Building 203 ▪ Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 ▪ 651-201-3287 mn.gov/admin/shpo ▪ mnshpo@state.mn.us AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND SERVICE PROVIDER March 15, 2022 Dusty Finke City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 RE: EAW – Loram / Scannell Medina Industrial T118 R23 S11, Medina, Hennepin County SHPO Number: 2022-0883 Dear Dusty Finke: Thank you for providing this office with a copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the above-referenced project. Based on our review of the project information, we conclude that there are no properties listed in the National or State Registers of Historic Places, and no known or suspected archaeological properties in the area that will be affected by this project. However, according to the Office of the State Archaeologist’s site inventory portal, there is a burial mound site identified in the project vicinity. We recommend that you consult with the Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA) and the Minnesota Indian Affairs Council (MIAC) due to the presence of this site, per Sec. 307.08 of the Minnesota Private Cemeteries Act. Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36 CFR § 800. If this project is considered for federal financial assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, then review and consultation with our office will need to be initiated by the lead federal agency. Be advised that comments and recommendations provided by our office for this state-level review may differ from findings and determinations made by the federal agency as part of review and consultation under Section 106. Please contact Kelly Gragg-Johnson, Environmental Review Program Specialist, at kelly.graggjohnson@state.mn.us if you have any questions regarding our review of this project. Sincerely, Sarah J. Beimers Environmental Review Program Manager cc: Amanda Gronhovd, Office of the State Archaeologist Melissa Cerda, Minnesota Indian Affairs Council March 16, 2022 Dusty Finke Planning Director City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Re: Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet Dear Dusty Finke: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial Project (Project) located in the city of Medina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Project consists of a new industrial, office and warehouse development. Regarding matters for which the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has regulatory responsibility and other interests, the MPCA staff has the following comments for your consideration. Permits and Approvals (Item 8) Table 3 lists both a Construction Site Stormwater Permit and a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit as required from MPCA. The Project proposer will likely need only the NPDES/SDS General Construction Stormwater Permit (CSW Permit) from the MPCA. Water Resources (Item 11) • The intended stormwater management plans are not clear in the EAW. The EAW states that stormwater ponding will be utilized but also states infiltration will be used to reduce stormwater quantity when feasible, including use of above ground rain gardens and water reuse and underground filtration. The CSW Permit requires use of volume reduction practices to manage stormwater unless prohibited for reasons specified in the CSW Permit. Possible volume reduction practices include raingardens or bioinfiltration areas. Also, infiltration trenches or tree boxes could be utilized within the parking areas and pervious pavements to reduce stormwater volume. Underground filtration is not considered a volume reduction practice. The Project proposer could also consider green roofs or the stormwater reuse mentioned in the EAW. If additional stormwater management is needed to achieve the planned volume reduction of 1.1 inch, then ponding may be necessary. • If stormwater ultimately discharges to Elm Creek, which has a construction-related impairment, then additional stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are required during construction that are not mentioned in the EAW. These include stabilizing inactively worked soils within 7 days and providing a temporary sediment basin for 5 or more acres draining to a common location. These requirements must be specified in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the Project. Dusty Finke Page 2 March 16, 2022 • Any soil disturbance within 50 feet of the wetlands on the site will require that redundant (double) downgradient sediment control BMPs are installed to keep sediment from entering the wetlands. Questions regarding Construction Stormwater Permit requirements should be directed to Roberta Getman at 507-206-2629 or Roberta.Getman@state.mn.us. Noise (Item 17) The Project will need to conform with state noise standards during operation. Any operation noise levels would need to meet the Noise Area Classification (NAC) 1 standards by the time sound reaches the neighboring residential properties. For residential locations (NAC 1), the limits are L10 = 65 dBA and L50 = 60 dBA during the daytime (7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m.) and L10 = 55 dBA and L50 = 50 dBA during the nighttime (10:00 p.m. – 7:00 a.m.) (Minn. R. 7030.0040). This means that during a one-hour period of monitoring, daytime noise levels cannot exceed 65 dBA for more than 10 percent of the time (six minutes) and cannot exceed 60 dBA more than 50 percent of the time (30 minutes). For noise related questions, please contact Maggie Wenger at 651-757-2007 or Maggie.Wenger@state.mn.us. We appreciate the opportunity to review this Project. Please provide your specific responses to our comments and notice of decision on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement. Please be aware that this letter does not constitute approval by the MPCA of any or all elements of the Project for the purpose of pending or future permit action(s) by the MPCA. Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the Project proposer to secure any required permits and to comply with any requisite permit conditions. If you have any questions concerning our review of this EAW, please contact me by email at Karen.kromar@state.mn.us or by telephone at 651-757-2508. Sincerely, Karen Kromar This document has been electronically signed. Karen Kromar Planner Principal Environmental Review Unit Resource Management and Assistance Division KK:rs cc: Dan Card, MPCA, St. Paul Roberta Getman, MPCA, Rochester Maggie Wenger, MPCA, St. Paul Metropolitan Council (Regional Office & Environmental Services) 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101-1805 P 651.602.1000 | F 651.602.1550 | TTY 651.291.0904 metrocouncil.org An Equal Opportunity Employer March 16, 2022 Dusty Finke, Planning Director City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 RE: City of Medina - Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) – Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial Metropolitan Council Review No. 22728-1 Metropolitan Council District 1 Dear Dusty Finke: The Metropolitan Council received the EAW for the Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial project on February 14, 2022. The proposed project is located south of Trunk Highway 55 and east of Arrowhead Drive in Medina. The proposed development consists of 10 acres of new light industrial uses on a site with approximately 25 acres. The development would consist of three office/warehouse buildings. The staff review finds that the EAW is complete and accurate with respect to regional concerns and does not raise major issues of consistency with Council policies. An EIS is not necessary for regional purposes. We offer the following comments for your consideration. Item 9 – Land Use (Todd Graham, 651-602-1322) The EAW discusses a development with approximately 449,000 square feet of office/warehouse floorspace in three buildings; the buildings would cover approximately 40% of the total site. The EAW site is a small part of Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) #912 on the southside of Highway 55. At this time, the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan expects TAZ #912 to gain +427 jobs during 2020-2040. This is a reasonable expectation as the Loram/Scannell development is the only new development in this neighborhood. If a greater level of employment is expected in this zone, please request a TAZ allocation adjustment by contacting Council Research. Items 11– Water Resources - Wastewater (Roger Janzig, 651-602-1122) The Metropolitan Disposal System has adequate capacity for this project location. Items 11– Water Resources – Stormwater (Maureen Hoffman, 651-602-1279) The proposed site plan provided (Attachment A) did not contain a legend. On the site plan it appears that a building is impinging on the northeast wetland. We want to reiterate that the developer continues to work with the City, as the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) authority, and the Elm Creek Watershed District to limit impacts on wetlands. Additionally, stormwater must be pretreated before entering a wetland. Page - 2 | March 16, 2022 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL The developer noted they will be working with the City as the WCA authority and will be applying for wetland banking credits. We encourage the developer look within the same watershed/subwatershed to do the wetland banking replacement. Finally, since the proposed development is within one mile of Elm Creek, which is impaired, we ask the developer to implement stormwater practices that would minimize negative impacts to the creek. Item 18 – Transportation (Victoria Dan, 612-349-7648) The Loram/Scannell development does not presently impact fixed route transit. As the City is aware, the Metropolitan Council in coordination with MnDOT have begun to study the feasibility of potential future bus rapid transit in the Trunk Highway 55 corridor between downtown Minneapolis and Medina. At this stage, it is not clear what impacts, if any, the project may have on the transit feasibility study. Item 19 - Cumulative Potential Effects (Eric Wojchik, 651-602-1330) The City’s adopted 2040 Comprehensive Plan states “Medina is committed to encouraging and promoting solar energy as a clean, alternative form of energy production and reducing carbon- based emissions.” Council staff recommend the design and integration of solar panels at this proposed development to serve some portion of the electricity to be consumed by 448,400 square feet of office/warehouse floor space. Council staff recommend using the U.S. National Renewable Energy Lab’s tool “PV Watts” for cross-evaluating solar cost, design, and production (https://pvwatts.nrel.gov/index.php). This concludes the Council’s review of the EAW. The Council will not take formal action on the EAW. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Freya Thamman, Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1750 or via email at Freya.Thamman@metc.state.mn.us. Sincerely, Angela R. Torres, AICP, Manager Local Planning Assistance CC: Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT - Metro Division Judy Johnson, Metropolitan Council District 1 Freya Thamman, Sector Representative/Principal Reviewer Reviews Coordinator N:\CommDev\LPA\Communities\Medina\Letters\Medina 2022 Loram Scannell Medina Industrial EAW Ok w Comments 22728-1.docx Division of Ecological and Water Resources Transmitted by Email Region 3 Headquarters 1200 Warner Road Saint Paul, MN 55106 March 16, 2022 Dusty Finke, Planning Director City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Dear Dusty Finke, Thank you for the opportunity to review the Loram / Scannell Medina Industrial EAW. The DNR respectfully submits the following comments for your consideration: 1. Page 13, Stormwater. Stormwater features may be colonized by Blanding’s turtles (state-listed as threatened) in the area, therefore we recommend incorporating avoidance into stormwater management. In years when the stormwater features will be dredged to remove excess sediment, please draw down water levels by September 15th in order to allow turtles to find overwintering habitat elsewhere. 2. Page 13, Stormwater. We strongly encourage the development to use weed-free, suitable, native seed mixes and plants in project stormwater features and landscaping in order to provide pollinator habitat. The Board of Soil and Water Resources’ website contains many great resources for choosing seed mixes and establishing native plants. 3. Page 13, Stormwater. The planned increase in impervious surfaces will also increase the amount of road salt used in the project area. Chloride released into local lakes and streams does not break down, and instead accumulates in the environment, potentially reaching levels that are toxic to aquatic wildlife and plants. Consider promoting local business and city participation in the Smart Salting Training offered through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. There are a variety of classes available for road applicators, sidewalk applicators, and property managers. More information and resources can be found at this website. Many winter maintenance staff who have attended the Smart Salting training — both from cities and counties and from private companies — have used their knowledge to reduce salt use and save money for their organizations. We also encourage cities and counties to consider how they may participate in the Statewide Chloride Management Plan and provide public outreach to reduce the overuse of chloride. Here are some educational resources for residents as well as a sample ordinance regarding chloride use. 4. Page 14, Surface Waters. This section states that 3 acres of wetlands will be filled, but Table 2. Cover Types shows that 3 acres of wetlands are present on the site and 1.3 will remain upon completion of the project. The Cover Type section should be updated to reflect the actual amount of wetland impact. 5. Page 14, Surface Waters. It appears that wetland impacts are proposed to Unnamed Public Water Wetland (#27048900). Please coordinate with DNR Area Hydrologist, Wes Saunders- Pearce (wes.saunders-pearce@state.mn.us) throughout the WCA process and to determine if a DNR Public Waters Work Permit will be required. 6. Page 17, Rare Features. This section incorrectly states that no Regionally Significant Ecological Areas (RSEA) or DNR Native Plant Communities (NPC) are present within a mile of the project area. Please note that there are multiple RSEA’s in the direct vicinity of the project, including bordering the project area directly to the west. There are also NPC’s documented within the MBS Sites approximately half a mile to the west of the project area. Page 19, Impacts to Threatened and Endangered Species. Please note that this comment is a response to your request for concurrence regarding your query of the Natural Heritage Information System. Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii), a state-listed threatened species, have been documented in the vicinity of the proposed project. o Avoid wetland impacts during hibernation season, between October 15th and April 15th, unless the area is unsuitable for hibernation. o The use of erosion control blanket shall be limited to ‘bio-netting’ or ‘natural-netting’ types, and specifically not products containing plastic mesh netting or other plastic components. Also, be aware that hydro-mulch products may contain small synthetic (plastic) fibers to aid in their matrix strength. These loose fibers could potentially re - suspend and make their way into Public Waters. As such, please review mulch products and not allow any materials with synthetic (plastic) fiber additives in areas that drain to Public Waters. o Areas where there will be construction should be checked for turtles before the use of heavy equipment or any ground disturbance. The Blanding’s turtle flyer must be given to all contractors working in the area. Monitor for turtles during construction and report any sightings to the DNR Nongame Specialist, Erica Hoaglund at 651-259-5772 or Erica.Hoaglund@state.mn.us. If turtles are in imminent danger they must be moved by hand out of harm’s way, otherwise, they are to be left undisturbed. If the above avoidance measures are not possible, please contact NHIS Review Specialist, Samantha Bump (Samantha.Bump@state.mn.us). For additional information, see the Blanding’s turtle fact sheet, which describes the habitat use and life history of this species. The fact sheet also provides two lists of recommendations for avoiding and minimizing impacts to this rare turtle. Please refer to both lists of recommendations and apply those that are relevant to your project. For further assistance regarding the Blanding’s turtle, please contact the DNR Regional Nongame Specialist, Erica Hoaglund. Thank you again for the opportunity to review this document. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Melissa Collins Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist | Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 Phone: 651-259-5755 Email: melissa.collins@state.mn.us CC: Scott Moe, Scannell Properties Equal Opportunity Employer Metropolitan District 1500 County Road B-2 West Roseville, MN 55113 Page 1 of 2 March 7, 2022 Dusty Finke City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, Minnesota, 55340 SUBJECT: Loram / Scannell Medina Industrial MnDOT Review # EAW22-002 SE quad of MN55 and Arrowhead Drive Control Section: 2722 Medina, Hennepin County Dear Dusty Finke, Thank you for the opportunity to review the Loram / Scannell Medina Industrial EAW. Please note that MnDOT's review of this EAW does not constitute approval of a regional traffic analysis and is not a specific approval for access or new roadway improvements. As plans are refined, we would like the opportunity to review the updated information. MnDOT’s staff has reviewed the document and has the following comments: Walking and Biking Please consider including direct, accessible non-motorized connections from the sidepath along Arrowhead Drive to building entrances in the development. For questions regarding this comment, contact Jesse Thornsen, Metro Multimodal, at Jesse.Thornsen@state.mn.us or 651-234-7788. Permits Any use of, or work within or affecting, MnDOT right of way will require a permit. Permits can be applied for at this site: https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. Please upload a copy of this letter when applying for any permits. For questions regarding this comment, contact Buck Craig, Metro Permits Section, at Buck.Craig@state.mn.us or 651-234-7911. Review Submittal Options MnDOT’s goal is to complete reviews within 30 calendar days. Review materials received electronically can be processed more rapidly. Do not submit files via a cloud service or SharePoint link. In order of preference, review materials may be submitted as: 1. Email documents and plans in PDF format to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us. Attachments may not exceed 20 megabytes per email. Documents can be zipped as well. If multiple emails are necessary, number each message. Page 2 of 2 2. For files over 20 megabytes, upload the PDF file(s) to MnDOT’s Web Transfer Client site: https://mft.dot.state.mn.us. Contact MnDOT Planning development review staff using the same email above for uploading instructions, and send an email listing the file name(s) after the document(s) has/have been uploaded. You are welcome to contact me at 651-234-7785, or Jake.Schutt@state.mn.us with any questions. Sincerely, Jake Schutt Principal Planner Copy sent via email: Jason Swenson, Water Resources Buck Craig, Permits Doug Nelson, Right of Way Ashley Hansen, Traffic Brandi Kastner, Traffic Andrew Lutaya, Area Engineer Lance Schowalter, Design Mike Samuelson, Ped/Bike Planning Mackenzie Turner Barger, Multimodal Planning Jesse Thornsen, Ped/Bike Planning Tod Sherman, Planning Cameron Muhic, Planning David Elvin, Planning David Kratz, Planning Russell Owen, Metropolitan Council elm creek Watershed Management Commi ssion ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 3235 Fernbrook Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 PH: 763.553.1144 E-mail: judie@jass.biz CHAMPLIN • CORCORAN • DAYTON • MAPLE GROVE • MEDINA • PLYMOUTH • ROGERS February 16, 2022 City of Medina Mr. Dusty Finke, Planning Director 2052 County Road 24 Medina, Minnesota 55340 Re: Loram/ Scannell Medina Industrial EAW Dear Mr. Finke, On behalf of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, I would like to offer the following comments on the Loram/ Scannell Medina Industrial EAW. • The Elm Creek WMC standards and requirements are addressed in this EAW report. A complete list of the Elm Creek WMC rules and standards can be viewed at Application Requirements - Elm Creek Watershed. Site development must meet these stormwater, wetlands, buffers, floodplains, and erosion control standards. • The cumulative effect of increased runoff volume is an emerging issue in the ECWMC due to rapid development and the construction of impervious issues in the watershed. Increased runoff volumes are associated with increased flood risk for our downstream communities. This in turn leads to degradation of channel banks due to increa sed non- peak flows, aquatic species disturbance due to hydrologic regime changes, and the warming of stormwater runoff. Many of the site soils in Medina have low and very low infiltration potential (high runoff potential). To the extent reasonabl e, the site design should limit increased annual runoff volume by using best management practices. • This site plan contributes to the trend of highly dense industrial areas that account for major land use and grading impacts to the Elm Creek Watershed. To a large extent wetlands on these parcels are being removed and being replaced with largely impervious surfaces with little or no natu ral areas remaining. These changes will result in localized habitat loss, disconnection of habitat, warming of runoff, and micr oclimate impacts. Wetland impacts should be avoided to the extent reasonable. Please contact me if you have any questions on this information. Sincerely Ross Mullen, Technical Advisor to the Commission Cc Jim Kujawa, ECWMC; Judie Anderson, ECWMC 1 Dusty Finke From:Roos, Stephan (MDA) <stephan.roos@state.mn.us> Sent:Friday, March 11, 2022 2:02 PM To:Dusty Finke Subject:Loram / Scannell Medina Industrial EAW Hi Dusty, The Minnesota Department of Agriculture thanks you for the opportunity to review the Scoping EAW for the proposed Loram / Scannell Medina Industrial Project. Although we always regret to see the conversion of agricultural land, in particular, prime farmland, to other land uses, we understand the need that cities face in finding suitable locations to meet the demand for development. We also recognize and respect the rights and responsibilities that local units of government have in making appropriate decisions for their residents. As such, we have no comments to make on the EAW. Thank you again, Steve Steve Roos, PLA, ASLA Environmental Planner Energy and Environment Section Agricultural Marketing and Development Division Minnesota Department of Agriculture 625 Robert Street North Saint Paul, MN 55155‐2538 Ph: 651‐201‐6631 office www.mda.state.mn.us Letter 1 328 West Kellogg Blvd St Paul, MN 55102 OSA.Project.Reviews.adm@state.mn.us Date: 03/14/2022 Dusty Finke City of Medina 763-473-8846 dusty.finke@medinamn.gov Project Name: Loram Scannell Medina Industrial EAW Notes/Comments I appreciate being given the opportunity to comment on the above listed project. Review of the records at the Office of the State Archaeologist revealed the presence of a previously reported (not field verified) burial site, 21HEag. Therefore, I recommend a qualified archaeologist conduct a phase I reconnaissance survey to determine if the project could damage unrecorded burial or archaeological sites. Recommendations ☐ Not Applicable ☐ No Concerns ☐ Monitoring ☐ Phase Ia – Literature Review ☒ Phase I – Reconnaissance survey ☐ Phase II – Evaluation ☐ Phase III – Data Recovery If you require additional information or have questions, comments, or concerns please contact our office. Sincerely, Letter 2 Jennifer Tworzyanski Assistant to the State Archaeologist OSA Kellogg Center 328 Kellogg Blvd W St Paul MN 55102 651.201.2265 jennifer.tworzyanski@state.mn.us Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery Public Works Facility, 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55430 hennepin.us March 3, 2022 Dusty Finke City of Medina Planning Director 2052 County Rd 24 Medina, MN 55340 Re: Hennepin County staff comments on the Loram / Scannell Medina Industrial Development EAW as advertised in the EQB Monitor February 15, 2022 Dear Mr. Finke: This letter provides our staff’s comments related to environmental, stormwater and transportation impacts of the above noted EAW for the Loram / Scannell Industrial development in Medina. The project includes potential development of up to 426,600 sq. ft. warehouse/industrial on approximately 25 acres on the east side of Arrowhead Drive, south of Highway 55. The project includes new water service, sewer, stormwater, streets, and utilities. All of these new services would be extensions to existing infrastructure or upgrading existing systems to support the new development. Page 6, Table 2 (Cover Types) In what way has the design team tried to avoid impacts to wetlands and reduce impervious surface on this project? It seems like there would be further opportunities to do so. Page 7, Land Use I Hennepin County supports the creation and preservation of affordable agricultural space for every scale of local food production. While each individual farmland to non-farmland conversion is a private choice, the impacts of the cumulative loss on rural character, diversity of landscapes, open spaces and vistas, as well a local resilience to our changing climate should be considered. Page 11, Table 5 This document does not require discussion of winter snow and ice management, however, note that Elm Creek is already impaired for chloride. Winter snow and ice management should be informed by "Smart Salting" techniques to minimize salt use. The wetland areas on the east edge of this property feed directly to the already impaired Elm Creek. Reversing water quality impairments will almost certainly require exceeding requirements, especially considering climate change impacts that we are already experiencing. If applicant has an interest in receiving assistance from the county to explore options for going above and beyond stormwater requirements to help improve water quality, reach out to Karen Galles (Karen.Galles@hennepin.us) Page 12, Stormwater II The western wetland on this property (wetland 8) is likely hydrologically connected to the wetland complex on the Hennepin County Public Works facility across Arrowhead Drive. Impacts to this wetland and drainage west from this project will directly impact Hennepin County's natural resource restoration efforts at our Public Works facility. Again, if applicant would be interested in assistance from the county to exceed project minimum requirements, which in this case would directly benefit county activities and property, please contact Karen Galles (Karen.Galles@hennepin.us) Appreciate the mention of partial on-site wetland mitigation, however, stormwater pretreatment facilities do not have all the same ecological function services as existing wetlands. Avoiding wetland impacts to existing wetlands would be preferred. What design alternatives have been considered to avoid additional impacts to the existing wetlands on site? Consider reducing overall impervious surfaces to help improve infiltration potential. Page 14, Surface Water IV Mitigation must occur as close to the project site as possible, and preferably on-site. Mitigation outside of the local watershed (i.e., areas draining to Elm Creek), and certainly outside the County, does little to benefit natural resources for city and county residents. We permitted approximately 76 acres of wetland impacts last year in Hennepin County and only about 16 acres of mitigation bank credits purchased for those acres were in our county. We do appreciate statements expressing good intent to purchase mitigation acres nearby, however, we have a strong preference for avoiding impacts in the first place. Page 17, Section B Given this, we encourage the proposer to avoid impacts to Wetland 4 and the seasonally flooded portion of Wetland 5. Page 18, Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species Please consider monarch butterfly habitat when creating landscape plans (e.g., for screening required at western edge of site) and for alternatives to some of the impervious currently planned for the site. Page 18, Section C Previous page says that the wetland complex to the east of the site could be suitably habitat for trumpeter swans, the project is planning impacts to Wetlands 4 and 5, which are part of that complex. Page 22, Transportation Proposing 449,300 square-ft in building surface area. Medina ordinance requires one space per 2,000 square-ft gross floor area, thusly city only requires 225 stalls. This plan calls for 634 (169 for trucks + 465 for automobiles). Is this much parking essential to success? If planners only anticipate a peak of ~150 cars, why are they proposing a need for 634 stalls? Not clear what amount of occupancy this correlates with. Even if its 50% occupancy there are still twice as many stalls as necessary. Excess parking stalls could be removed, providing more space for on- site wetland mitigation. Attachment A, Proposed Site Plan Could site plan avoid easterly internal driveway and consolidate a single N-S driveway connection to Loram Site? This would be a good way to mitigate wetland impacts and reduce impervious area. If impacting the wetland(s) along Arrowhead Dr frontage, developer should relocate the impacted trail segment to the appropriate offset. The property to the south had to install the trail and since they didn't own this land they avoided impact mitigation. Now is the time to correct this in our opinion. Storm water needs to be managed on-site; no additional flows are allowed into county right-of- way. 4.0 Proposed Development, Site Access Circulation County guidelines based partially on MnDOT, FHWA, etc. best practices recommends turn lanes in both directions for access(es) with these many projected trips. One way to mitigate these needs would be to have the southerly access on Arrowhead Dr to be outbound only (narrowed and signed). This would funnel the predominant inbound movement (especially trucks) into the northerly access closest to Trunk Highway 55 utilizing the existing 4-lane segment for inbound movements. Appendices, PG 18 Traffic Impact Analysis It is helpful to have these Simtraffic reports in the appendix as it shows what software was used and allows for more in-depth analysis by traffic engineers if needed. We appreciate your consideration of Hennepin County comments at this time and look forward to your response. If you have any questions, please contact me a 612-596-0394 or jason.gottfried@hennepin.us Sincerely, Jason Gottfried Transportation Planner Hennepin County Public Works 1 Dusty Finke From:Goetsch, Dylan (MIAC) <Dylan.Goetsch@state.mn.us> Sent:Friday, March 11, 2022 11:42 AM To:Dusty Finke Cc:Tworzyanski, Jennifer (ADM) Subject:Re: Loram Scannell Medina Industrial EAW Good afternoon Dusty, I was looking over the EAW, and there is a recorded American Indian burial /alpha site (21HEag) associated with this area. I would recommend an archaeological survey to be done ahead of any ground disturbances to make sure no burials are disturbed. I CC’d Jennifer from the Office of the State Archaeologist on here as well. Let me know if I can be of any help at all, thanks! Dylan Goetsch Cultural Resource Specialist Minnesota Indian Affairs Council 161 St. Anthony Avenue, Ste. 919 Saint Paul, MN 55103 C: 651‐724‐3325 E: Dylan.Goetsch@state.mn.us mn.gov/indianaffairs Resolution No. 2021-## DATE Member _________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2022-## RESOLUTION APPROVING THE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE LORAM/SCANNELL MEDINA INDUSTRIAL EAW AND MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules 4410.4300 subpart 14, requires that an Environmental Assessment Worksheet be prepared for projects that involve construction of a new or expansion of an existing warehousing or light industrial facility equal to or in excess of 300,000 square feet; and WHEREAS, on February 1, 2022, the Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial Environmental Assessment Worksheet (the “EAW”) was completed relating to a proposed project to consist of a total of approximately 450,000 square feet of office/warehouse uses on the site and new infrastructure, including water service, sewer, stormwater, streets, and utilities; and WHEREAS, the City is the Responsible Government Unit for preparing the EAW for the project pursuant to above-stated Rules; and WHEREAS, on February 17, 2022 the City submitted a press release to the Crow River News announcing the completion of the EAW and its availability for public comment; and WHEREAS, by February 9, 2022, copies of the EAW were distributed to all persons and agencies on the official Environmental Quality Board (EQB) distribution list and other interested parties; and WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the EAW was publicly noticed in the EQB Monitor, commencing the 30-day public comment period; and WHEREAS, the 30-day comment period ended March 17, 2022 at 4:30 p.m., and the City accepted and responded to all written comments received in accordance with state requirements; and WHEREAS, none of the comments received recommended preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (an “EIS) for the project; and Resolution No. 2022-## 2 DATE WHEREAS, the proposed project requires various other land use approvals for which the City maintains discretion and authority notwithstanding the EAW process or determination whether an EIS is required; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is also subject to relevant regulatory authority and review by various agencies related to mitigating potential environmental impacts during the review process; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared a document entitled “Loram/Scannell Industrial Findings of Fact and Record of Decision” dated March 30, 2022 related to the EAW (the “Record of Decision”), which is incorporated into this resolution as if fully set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Medina, Minnesota that: 1. The EAW was prepared in compliance with the procedures of the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act and Minnesota Rules, Parts 4410.1000 to 4410.1700. 2. The EAW satisfactorily addressed the environmental issues for which existing information could have been reasonably obtained. 3. Based on the criteria established in Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, the proposed project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. 4. The City adopts the Record of Decision and directs the Planning Director, or their designee, to maintain and to distribute it in accordance with the EQB rules. 5. Based upon the adopted Record of Decision, the City herby makes a “negative declaration” as it relates to the EAW and hereby determines that an Environmental Impact Statement is not required for the proposed project. Dated: DATE. __________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ____________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2022-## 3 DATE EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property That part of the South 1/2 of the Northwest Quarter, Section 11, Township 118, Range 23 described as beginning at the Northwest corner of said South 1/2 of the Northwest Quarter; thence East along the North line thereof 1485 feet; thence South parallel to the West line thereof 528 feet; thence West parallel to the said North line 1485 feet to an intersection with the West line thereof; thence North along said West line 528 feet to the point of beginning. And The South 250 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 11, Township 118, Range 23. McDonald’s – 822 Hwy 55 Page 1 of 3 April 5, 2022 CUP Amendment City Council MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Debra Dion, Associate Planner; through Director of Planning Finke DATE: March 22, 2022 MEETING: April 5, 2022, City Council Meeting SUBJ: Landform on Behalf of McDonald’s – 822 Hwy 55 – Conditional Use Permit Amendment Review Deadline Application Received: February 24, 2022 60 Day Review Deadline: April 24, 2022 Summary of Request On behalf of McDonalds, USA, LLC, Landform requests a conditional use permit amendment. McDonald’s currently has a single lane drive-through and propose modifications to allow for two lanes, which widens and lengthens the drive-through in its current location. The subject property is located at 822 State Highway 55, which is located at the NW corner of 116/55. Background/History Staff is recommending Resolution 97-07 be rescinded and replaced with new conditions since the conditions are outdated. An aerial of the site and surrounding properties can be found below. Agenda Item #7E McDonald’s – 822 Hwy 55 Page 2 of 3 April 5, 2022 CUP Amendment City Council Conditional Use Permit Review The subject property is 2 acres in size and is currently zoned CH, Commercial Highway. The Properties to the west, east, and south are also zoned CH. The property to the north is zoned IP, Industrial Park. Supplemental Requirements for Specific Uses within Commercial Zoning Districts In Subd. 7 of Section 838.5.08, the standards for drive through services are provided. Staff has provided potential findings for each criterion in italics. (a) All parts of the drive-through lane(s) shall be no less than 200 feet from residential zoning districts. The subject property is not within 200 feet of residential zoned property. (b) Drive-through lanes shall not be permitted within required yard setback areas. The expansion of the drive-through lane is moving towards the building and not towards the exterior of the site. The setback is not reducing. This existing drive-thru currently does not meet the setback requirements due to right-of-way being dedicated for the roadway to the north. The proposed modification is not increasing the use into the setback area or intensifying the amount of noncompliance, and therefore staff believes it is appropriate to approve. (c) The site plan shall allow adequate pedestrian circulation, vehicle circulation, and vehicle stacking which does not interfere with on-site parking and loading. The stacking of vehicles exceeds the five required. The project will allow for increased volume of drive-through customers to utilize the service and get through the lane much quicker than it is currently operating. The circulation and stacking have a few challenges as it exists, and staff believes the proposed amendment would be an improvement. (d) The drive-through shall allow adequate stacking and circulation so as to avoid impacts on adjacent property or public right-of-way. The drive-through stacking and circulation should not have impacts on adjacent properties or right-of-way. The City’s parking ordinance requires a minimum of five stacking spaces for a drive-through use, but the CUP standards allow a higher amount if deemed necessary by the city. The applicant is proposing eight (8). The three additional stacking spaces would impact the internal parking spaces and circulation; however, we do not anticipate it backing up onto the street since staff is not aware of ever receiving complaints related to the drive-through. (e) The City may require additional necessary conditions to limit the impact of drive-through lanes on surrounding property, including but not limited to: limiting hours of operation, restricting drive- through lane orientation, limiting the volume of loudspeakers and ordering devises, and/or requiring additional landscaping, berming, or other means of screening. Staff recommends that the applicant provide a more in-depth landscape plan prior to a permit being issued for the project. The areas shown as landscaping shall be sodded with landscaping and not rockbed. Loudspeakers is one of the conditions of the 1997 CUP, which was not to be allowed on the property. This regulation was unknown prior to this application and not enforced. Staff will be asking that the condition of no loudspeakers be removed as a condition since it would be difficult for a drive-through business to operate without loudspeakers and have a drive-through window. McDonald’s – 822 Hwy 55 Page 3 of 3 April 5, 2022 CUP Amendment City Council Planning Commission Recommendation The City has a relatively low amount of discretion in the review of conditional use permits. If the proposal meets the general criteria noted above and the specific standards previously discussed, it should be approved. The City may impose, in addition to those standards and requirements expressly specified in this Ordinance, additional conditions which the City Council considers necessary to protect the best interests of the community. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed CUP Amendment on March 8th, 2022. There were no public comments. An excerpt from the draft meeting minutes is attached for reference. Planning Commissioners believed the expansion of the drive-thru would be an improvement to how the site operates and supported the change. The Planning Commissioners and staff recommended approval of the CUP Amendment, subject to the following conditions: 1) The landscaping along the north side of the building shall be sod with integrated shrubs. 2) Separate sign permits are required for each sign. 3) Lighting and sounds from menu boards shall be maintained at levels so as not to impact neighboring properties. 4) Demolition permit shall be applied for prior to the start of work, providing specific landscaping details on the north side of the building. 5) There shall be no exterior storage allowed on the property. 6) The applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the zoning amendment, conditional use permit amendment, and other relevant documents. Potential Motion If the City Council finds that the general and specific CUP criteria described above have been met, the following action could be taken: Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the amendment to the CUP subject to the conditions noted. Attachments 1) Resolution 97-07 2) Draft PC Meeting minutes 3.8.22 3) Applicant Narrative 4) Plan Set Member Ferris introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION N0. 97-07 RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MCDONALD'S CORPORATION/DAVID MAYER WHEREAS, David Mayer is the fee owner of property located in the northwest quadrant of T.H.55 and County Road 116 (the "Property"), which Property is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto; and WHEREAS, McDonald's Corporation has an agreement to purchase the Property and intends to construct a fast food restaurant thereon; and WHEREAS, David Mayer and McDonald's Corporation (collectively, the "Applicants") have applied for a conditional use permit to construct a fast food restaurant on tlie Property; and WHEREAS, the Property is zoned urban commercial, which zoning district allows a fast food restaurant by conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, this matter was heard by the planning commission at its meeting on February 11, 1997, and by the city council at its meeting on March 4, 1997; and WHEREAS, the city council has determined, based in part upon the recommendation of the plaru'iing commission, that granting a conditioxial use permit to the Applicants for the stated purpose will not adversely affect the development of adjacent property for purposes for which it is zoned. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota, that a conditional use permit be granted to the Applicants for the purpose of constructing a fast food restaurant on the Property, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1.The Applicants must comply with all requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed District; 2. The Applicants must deed to the city the easements for drainage, utilities, trail, ponding and roadway as determined by the city engineer; 3. The safety of the NURP pond must be approved by the city staff', 4. The Hamel fire department must approve hydrant locations and plans for fire protection of the building; 5. The city's recycling requirements must be met; RHB119105 ME230-255 I 6. All requirements contained in the city engineer's letter of January 24, 1997, as modified by his letter of February 6, 1997, must be met, with the exception that the Property does not require combining or subdividing; 7. There shall be no exterior storage allowed on the Property; 8. City staff must verify that all signs meet city ordinance requirements; 9. All roof-top mechanical equipment must be screened from view from adjacent properties and roadways; 10. TheApplicantsmustadheretothelandscapingplansubmittedtothecityanddated February 11, 1997; 11. All parking areas must meet city ordinances; 12. The number of employees will be approximately 75 full and parttime; 13. All exterior lighting must be designed and installed so that the globe is recessed and enclosed on all sides except the bottom and no light is cast directly on any other property; 14. There shall be no outside bells or loudspeakers on the Property; 15. The Applicants must post wiith the city a financial guarantee in the form of a letter of credit in the amount of $168,998 to assure completion of the site improvements; 16. The exterior trash container must be concrete, preferably broken-face block; 17. ThePropertyandtheadjacentroadwayswillbesubjecttoanannualtrafficsafety evaluation by the city; and 18. The Applicants must pay to the city an administrative fee in the amount necessary to reimburse the city for its costs in reviewing this application. Dated: March 18 1997. J ,uFefflS!Ma,yfoW ATTE Paul Robinson, Clerk-Treasurer RHB119105 ME2 3 0 - 2 5 5 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member JOhnSOn and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Ferris, Harnjlton, Johnson, and Zietlow- and the following voted against same: None Absent ; Thies Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RHB119105 ME230-255 3 Exhibit A The Property is comprised of two parcels, located in Heru"iepin Coutxty, Minnesota, legally described as follows: Parcel 1: That part of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 11, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Cornmencing at the Northeast corner of said quarter-quarter; thence South along the center line of County Road No. 116, distant 164 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continuing South 262.1 feet to the intersection of the centerline of County Road No. 116 and State Highway No. 55; thence Northwesterly along the centerline of State Highway No. 55, distant 290 feet; thence North parallel with said centerline of County Road No. 116, distant 79.7 feet; thence deflection to the right 17 degrees 45 minutes, distant 105 feet; thence Easterly, 240.55 feet to the actual point of beginning, except the Easterly 40 feet thereof conveyed to the County of Hennepin for roadway. Parcel 2: That part of tlie East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 11, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at a point in the center line of State Highway No. 55, distant 290 feet Northwesterly from the East line of said Northeast 1/4; thence North parallel with said East line, a distance of 79.7 feet; thence deflecting to the right 17 degrees 45 minutes, a distance of 105 feet to the actual point of beginning of the land to be described; thence East to a point in the East line of said Northeast 1/4, distant 164 feet South from the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4; thence North along said East line to a point distant 70 feet North from the Southeast corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4; thence West parallel with the South line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, a distance of 33 feet; thence Northwesterly, a distance of 336.5 feet to a point distant 115 feet North from the South line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4; thence Northwesterly, a distance of 203.8 feet along a line which if extended would intersect the west line of said Northeast 1/4 of tlie Nortlieast 1/4 at a point distant 503 feet Nortli of the Southwest corner thereof', thence South to a point distant 60 feet North fron':i the South line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4; thence Southeasterly and parallel with the center line of said Highwiay No. 55, a distance of 236.35 feet; thence Easterly, a distance of 93.65 feet to a point distant 123.5 feet North of the point of beginning; thence South to the point of beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota R)4B119266 ME230-255 CITY OF MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT Meeting Minutes Tuesday March 8, 2022 1. Call to Order: Chairperson Nielsen called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Neilsen read a statement explaining that the meeting is being held in a virtual format due to the ongoing pandemic and provided instructions for public participation. Present: Planning Commissioners John Jacob, Beth Nielsen, Cindy Piper, Braden Rhem and Timothy Sedabres. Absent: Planning Commissioner Ron Grajczyk and Justin Popp. Also Present: City Planning Director Dusty Finke and Associate Planner Debra Dion 7. McDonald’s – Conditional Use Permit to Modify and Expand Drive Thru Service – 822 Highway 55 (PID 1111823140020) Dion stated that the applicant is requested Conditional Use Permit amendment to expand their one lane drive thru into a two-lane drive thru. She identified the location of the existing drive thru and reviewed the zoning of adjacent parcels. She reviewed the site plan noting that the expanded drive thru would reduce parking but increase stacking in the drive thru. She reviewed the current parking numbers, noting the reduction of four spaces as a result of the expanded drive thru but noted that the parking would still exceed the minimum requirements. She noted that the stacking would increase by three spaces which also exceeds the minimum required. She stated that the Conditional Use Permit standards for a drive thru were included in the staff report. She noted that within the staff report are additional conditions recommended by staff. Kevin Shay, representing the applicant, stated that he is present to address any questions the Commission may have and confirmed that they support the conditions as recommended by staff. Nielsen opened the public hearing at 7:26 p.m. No comments made. Nielsen closed the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. Rhem stated that he did not have any questions and believed that this increase in capacity would be a good things. Piper agreed that this appears to be a good method to improve service for the business. Nielsen agreed that this appears to be a nice change and confirmed there were no questions from the Commission. Motion by Piper, seconded by Rhem, to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit based upon the findings and subject to the conditions described in the staff report. A roll call vote was performed: Jacob aye Piper aye Rhem aye Sedabres aye Nielsen aye Motion carries unanimously. Narrative Conditional Use Permit Prepared for: McDonald’s USA, LLC February 23, 2022 SUBMITTED TO City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 PREPARED BY Landform Professional Services, LLC 105 5th Ave S, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ..................................................................................................................... 1 Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Contact Information ................................................................................................................................... 2 Highway 55 McDonald’s, Medina, MN February 23, 2022 MCD18417 1 Introduction On behalf of McDonald’s USA, LLC, Landform is pleased to submit this application for conditional use permit approval to allow a second drive-through lane for the McDonald’s at 822 Highway 55. We are excited about the improvements proposed for this site. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) The conditional use permit we are requesting is to expand the existing single lane drive-through to accommodate a second drive-through lane. We have reviewed the request in accordance with City ordinance standards in Section 838.5.08 sued. 7 and find that the ordinance standards have been met. Specifically: (a) All parts of the drive-through lane(s) shall be no less than 200 feet from residential zoning districts. The McDonald’s site is surrounded by commercial and industrial zoning districts. Therefore, the drive-through is not within 200 feet of any residential zoning districts. (b) Drive-through lanes shall not be permitted within required yard setback areas. The drive-through lane is shown slightly inside the 25 foot building and parking setback, however this is the existing location of the drive-through and the proposed drive-through is not encroaching further into the setback. (c) The site plan shall allow adequate pedestrian circulation, vehicle circulation, and vehicle stacking which does not interfere with on-site parking and loading. The site plan shows that the vehicle stacking doesn’t interfere with the majority of the on-site parking. The spaces next to the building which have some vehicle stacking shown adjacent is an existing condition for the drive-through and with two lanes this condition will be reduced. (d) The drive-through shall allow adequate stacking and circulation so as to avoid impacts on adjacent property or public right-of-way. The site plan shows that the site has adequate stacking space and site circulation to avoid impacts on the public right-of-way. (e) The City may require additional necessary conditions to limit the impact of drive-through lanes on surrounding property, including but not limited to: limiting hours of operation, restricting drive-through lane orientation, limiting the volume of loudspeakers and ordering devises, and/or requiring additional landscaping, berming, or other means of screening. Understood. Highway 55 McDonald’s, Medina, MN February 23, 2022 MCD18417 2 Summary We respectfully request approval of the conditional use permit to allow a second drive through lane at the existing McDonald’s at 822 Highway 55. Contact Information This document was prepared by: Kevin Shay Landform 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Any additional questions regarding this application can be directed to Kevin Shay at kshay@landform.net or 612.638.0228. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > YOUTHANK BM 1 ELEV=1002.17 THRU DRIVE THRU DRIVE THRU DRIVE PYLON SIGN "MCDONALDS" HT=20.5 FT. PICKUP WINDOW PAY WINDOW PID: 1111823140020 822 STATE HWY NO 55 MEDINA, MN 55340 OWNER: ARCHLAND PROPERTY I LLC EXISTING SINGLE STORY BUILDING "MCDONALDS CORPORATION" FFE=994.95 HEIGHT=17.0 FT. 3542 SQ. FT. PYLON SIGN "MCDONALDS" HT=19.2 FT. >> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> UE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE UE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE G G G G UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UT UT FO FO FO G G G G G FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> FO FO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I UT UT >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> SHED UT STORM POND I I I I I I I OE OE OE PID: 1111823140002 MARGARET E RASMUSSEN PID: 1111823140004 MARGARET E RASMUSSEN PID: 1111823140006 JAN-HAR LLP PID: 1111823140012 MEDINA GROUP LLC HE N N E P I N C O U N T Y S T A T E A I D H I G H W A Y 5 5 PL A T 2 1 "WELCOME" SIGN BOARD HH MB CBBH RE=987.7 IE=983.2(NE) IE=983.2(S) CB RE=990.2 IE=981.7 CBBH RE=989.2 IE=983.7 WEIR RE=987.5 IE=985.7 CB RE=991.6 IE=981.8 SIG. BASE GAS SIG. BASE VLT VL T VL T VLT CB RE=991.3 IE=987.2(E) IE=982.5(N,S) CABX CABXCOBXGAS CABX SSMH RE=988.1 IE=976.3(SE) IE=976.3(NW) SSMH RE=992.2 IE=980.6(SE) IE=980.3(N) IE=980.2(NW) STMH RE=992.3 CB RE=991.8 IE=987.4 CB RE=992.7 IE=983.7 CB RE=993.4 IE=988.8 FES 12 RCP RE=985.6 CB RE=988.2 IE=983.4(NE) IE=980.9(SE) IE=980.9(NW) LT 992.4 992.4 CBMH RE=991.5 IE=988.7 LT CB RE=991.6 IE=988.9 FES 12 RCP RE=988.6 CB RE=992.1 IE=983.5992.6 12" TREE 8" TREE 4" TREE 993.9 994.0 994.1LT LT CB RE=993.4 IE=990.5 FES 12 RCP RE=986.0 994.7 LT EM GM CB RE=994.0 IE=989.3 CB RE=994.9 IE=990.0 CB RE=995.9 12" SPRUCE 993.5 993.5 993.8 SSMH RE=993.9 IE=985.6(SW) IE=982.7(NE) IE=982.0(N) IE=982.0(S) 994.3 SSMH GREASE TRAP RE=994.0 SSMH GREASE TRAP RE=994.0 LT SSMH RE=993.8 IE=986.6(W) IE=986.6(N) IE=986.5(NE) CB RE=995.2 IE=990.6 STMH RE=997.6 IE=990.3 PONDING EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 6939631 (EASEMENT 3) ROADW A Y A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T PER DO C . N O . 6 9 3 9 6 3 1 ( E A S E M E N T 1 ) PE R M A N E N T E A S E M E N T F O R H I G H W A Y P U R P O S E S PERM A N E N T E A S E M E N T FOR H I G H W A Y P U R P O S E S PERMA N E N T S L O P E E A S E M E N T 10 F O O T T R A I L P E R D O C . N O . 6 9 3 9 6 3 1 (E A S E M E N T 5 ) 10 F O O T R O A D W A Y D R A I N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T PE R D O C . N O . 6 9 3 9 6 3 1 (E A S M E N T 2 & 4 ) 10 10 10 DRAI N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T PER D O C 6 9 3 9 6 3 ( E A S E M E N T 2 ) 10 5 DRAI N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T PER D O C 6 9 3 9 6 3 1 (EAS E M E N T 2 ) 10 10 RO A D W A Y E A S E M E N T PE R D O C 6 9 3 9 6 3 1 (E A S E M E N T 6 ) 5 5 5 NE COR OF SE 14 OF NE 1 4 SEC. 11 T. 118 R. 23 SOUTH LINE OF SE 14 OF NE 1 4 SEC. 11 T. 118 R. 23 SE COR TWIN CITY MONORAIL SE C O R L O T 2 , B L O C K 1 TWIN C I T Y M O N O R A I L SOUTH LINE LOT 2, BLOCK 1 POB LIINE B 81° 5 6 ' 4 2 " 30 135° 1 2 ' 5 9 " LINE 1 16.4 4 LINE 2 371.52 297.71 89° 3 7 ' 4 9 " 13.29 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 6939631 (EASEMENT 2) 5 5 5 5 10 10 10 LINE B 1 0 6 ° 5 2 ' 2 1 " LINE A LINE A LINE D 17°45 ' 0 " LINE E POIN T F TR A S H EN C L O S U R E PEG'S COUNTRYSIDE CAFE CASEY'S GENERAL STORE - CONCRETE - - BITUMINOUS - - BITUMINOUS - LANDSCAPE ROCK A A S S ROOF DRAIN METAL COVER ROOF DRAIN 16.0 13 . 8 16.0 13 . 8 Δ Δ Δ Δ 9 9 0 995 995 9 8 9 9 9 1 9 9 2 993 994 996 996 997 997 9 9 8 99 8 990 986987 988 989 991 992 992 993 994 99 0 9 8 9 9 9 1 9 9 2 9 9 3 9 9 4 99 4 9 9 4 995995 XXX X X X 9 12 19 XXXXXX X X XXXXX 9 12 151515 15 20 C101MCD417.DWG DE M O L I T I O N C1.1 9 15 NORTH 0 30 60 Background information shown is from survey by Landform, Minneapolis, MN, on December, 7th, 2021, expressly for this project; City of Medina, MN record drawings; and utility service providers. Landform offers no warranty, expressed or written, for information provided by others. Existing project conditions shall be verified prior to beginning construction. Errors, inconsistencies, or omissions discovered shall be reported to the Engineer IMMEDIATELY. Reserved. 1. 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS :Curb Removal :Construction Limits Obtain permits for demolition, clearing, and disposal prior to beginning. Contact utility service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning demolition and clearing. See Sheet C3.1 for erosion prevention and sediment control measures that must be in place prior to disturbances to site. Reserved. Dimensions shown for removal are approximate. Coordinate with new construction to ensure appropriate removal of existing facilities. Pavement sawcut. Remove concrete walks and curbing to the nearest existing joint beyond construction limits. Complete demolition with minimal disruption of traffic. Coordinate lane closures with the regulatory authority and provide advance notification to affected emergency response providers. Provide barricades, lights, signs, traffic control, and other measures necessary for protection and safety of the public and maintain throughout construction. Protect structures, utilities, trees, plant material, sod, and adjacent property from damage during construction unless noted for removal. Damage shall be repaired to equal or better condition at no additional cost. Reserved. Reserved. Remove existing site features including, but not limited to, underground utilities, paving, curbing, walkways, fencing, retaining walls, screen walls, aprons, lighting, related foundations, signage, bollards, landscaping, and stairways within the construction limits unless noted otherwise. Coordinate removal, relocation, termination, and re-use of existing private utility services and appurtenances with the utility companies. Restore electric handholes, pullboxes, powerpoles, guylines, and structures disturbed by construction in accordance with utility owner requirements. Existing piping and conduits may be abandoned in-place if filled with sand and if not in location of proposed building or in conflict with proposed utilities or structures. Terminate existing services at the supply side in conformance with provider's standards. Haul demolition debris off-site to a facility approved by regulatory authorities for the handling of demolition debris, unless noted otherwise. Remove, salvage, and reinstall drive-thru signage. See detail C2.2 for installation locations. Remove pavement markings. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. 11. 13. 14. 16. 17. 18. GENERAL NOTES LEGEND DEMOLITION AND CLEARING NOTES For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.3. :Utility Line RemovalXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 :Pavement Sawcut 19 RE V I E W E D B Y DR A W N B Y ST A T E N U M B E R Mc D O N A L D ' S U S A , L L C . RE V RE V I S I O N H I S T O R Y SH E E T N A M E PR O T O . I S S U E D DA T E R E V I E W E D NA T I O N A L N U M B E R DA T E DA T E I S S U E D TH E S E D R A W I N G S A N D S P E C I F I C A T I O N S A R E T H E C O N F I D E N T I A L A N D P R O P R I E T A R Y P R O P E R T Y O F M c D O N A L D ' S CO R P O R A T I O N A N D S H A L L N O T B E C O P I E D O R R E P R O D U C E D W I T H O U T W R I T T E N A U T H O R I Z A T I O N . T H E C O N T R A C T DO C U M E N T S W E R E P R E P A R E D F O R U S E O N T H I S S P E C I F I C S I T E I N C O N J U N C T I O N W I T H I T S I S S U E D A T E A N D AR E N O T S U I T A B L E F O R U S E O N A D I F F E R E N T S I T E O R A T A L A T E R T I M E . U S E O F T H E S E D R A W I N G S F O R RE F E R E N C E O R E X A M P L E O N A N O T H E R P R O J E C T R E Q U I R E S T H E S E R V I C E S O F P R O P E R L Y L I C E N S E D A R C H I T E C T S AN D E N G I N E E R S . R E P R O D U C T I O N O F T H E C O N T R A C T D O C U M E N T S F O R R E U S E O N A N O T H E R P R O J E C T I S N O T A U T H O R I Z E D . CI T Y SH E E T N O . ST R E E T A D D R E S S ST A T E CO U N T Y CERTIFICATION PROJECT NO. FILE NAME:LA N D F O R M c 20 2 2 02 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 01 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 CN C ER W 02 2 - 0 3 3 5 21 8 3 5 HE N N E P I N MN 82 2 H W Y 5 5 ME D I N A MCD18417 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 Web: landform.net Know what's Below. Call before you dig. Landform and Site to Finish are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.®® 01 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 2 CI T Y S U B M I T T A L NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N 02 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 CI T Y R E S U B M I T T A L 20 YOUTHANK THRU DRIVE THRU DRIVE THRU DRIVE PICKUP WINDOW PAY WINDOW PID: 1111823140020 822 STATE HWY NO 55 MEDINA, MN 55340 OWNER: ARCHLAND PROPERTY I LLC EXISTING SINGLE STORY BUILDING "MCDONALDS CORPORATION" FFE=994.95 HEIGHT=17.0 FT. 3542 SQ. FT. FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FOFO FO SHED STORM POND PID: 1111823140002 MARGARET E RASMUSSEN PID: 1111823140004 MARGARET E RASMUSSEN PID: 1111823140006 JAN-HAR LLP HE N N E P I N C O U N T Y S T A T E A I D H I G H W A Y 5 5 PL A T 2 1 HH MB GAS SIG. VLT VL T VL T VLT CABX CABXCOBX GAS CABX LT LT LT LT LT EM GM LT PONDING EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 6939631 (EASEMENT 3) ROADW A Y A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T PER DO C . N O . 6 9 3 9 6 3 1 ( E A S E M E N T 1 ) PE R M A N E N T E A S E M E N T F O R H I G H W A Y P U R P O S E S PER M A N E N T E A S E M E N T FOR H I G H W A Y P U R P O S E S PERM A N E N T S L O P E E A S E M E N T 10 F O O T T R A I L P E R D O C . N O . 6 9 3 9 6 3 1 (E A S E M E N T 5 ) 10 F O O T R O A D W A Y D R A I N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T PE R D O C . N O . 6 9 3 9 6 3 1 (E A S M E N T 2 & 4 ) 10 10 10 5 DRAI N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T PER D O C 6 9 3 9 6 3 1 (EAS E M E N T 2 ) 10 10 RO A D W A Y E A S E M E N T PE R D O C 6 9 3 9 6 3 1 (E A S E M E N T 6 ) 5 5 5 NE COR OF SE SEC. 11 T. 118 R. 23 81° 5 6 ' 4 2 " 30 135° 1 2 ' 5 9 " LIN E 1 16.4 4 LINE 2 371.52 297.71 89° 3 7 ' 4 9 " 13.29 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 6939631 (EASEMENT 2) 5 5 5 5 10 10 LINE B 1 0 6 ° 5 2 ' 2 1 " LINE D 17°45 ' 0 " LINE E POIN T F TR A S H EN C L O S U R E PEG'S COUNTRYSIDE CAFE - BITUMINOUS - - BITUMINOUS - LANDSCAPE ROCK A A S S ROOF DRAIN METAL COVER ROOF DRAIN 16.0 13 . 8 16.0 13 . 8 DRIVETHRU 25' BUIL D I N G / P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 25' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 15 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 25 ' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 15 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 10' P A R K I N G / S I G N S E T B A C K 10 ' P A R K I N G / S I G N S E T B A C K 10 ' S I G N S E T B A C K 10' SIGN S E T B A C K 6. 3 ' R 2 0 ' R1.5' R2 0 ' R20' R 1 . 5 ' R20' 1 26 9 12 13 14 2 2 2 10 3 2a 4 8 11 12' 6' 10' 6 1 R5' 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 10'16.2' 10' 52 2 10 . 8 ' 41 . 3 ' C201MCD417.DWG C2.1 RE V I E W E D B Y DR A W N B Y ST A T E N U M B E R Mc D O N A L D ' S U S A , L L C . RE V RE V I S I O N H I S T O R Y SH E E T N A M E PR O T O . I S S U E D DA T E R E V I E W E D NA T I O N A L N U M B E R DA T E DA T E I S S U E D TH E S E D R A W I N G S A N D S P E C I F I C A T I O N S A R E T H E C O N F I D E N T I A L A N D P R O P R I E T A R Y P R O P E R T Y O F M c D O N A L D ' S CO R P O R A T I O N A N D S H A L L N O T B E C O P I E D O R R E P R O D U C E D W I T H O U T W R I T T E N A U T H O R I Z A T I O N . T H E C O N T R A C T DO C U M E N T S W E R E P R E P A R E D F O R U S E O N T H I S S P E C I F I C S I T E I N C O N J U N C T I O N W I T H I T S I S S U E D A T E A N D AR E N O T S U I T A B L E F O R U S E O N A D I F F E R E N T S I T E O R A T A L A T E R T I M E . U S E O F T H E S E D R A W I N G S F O R RE F E R E N C E O R E X A M P L E O N A N O T H E R P R O J E C T R E Q U I R E S T H E S E R V I C E S O F P R O P E R L Y L I C E N S E D A R C H I T E C T S AN D E N G I N E E R S . R E P R O D U C T I O N O F T H E C O N T R A C T D O C U M E N T S F O R R E U S E O N A N O T H E R P R O J E C T I S N O T A U T H O R I Z E D . CI T Y SH E E T N O . ST R E E T A D D R E S S ST A T E CO U N T Y CERTIFICATION PROJECT NO. FILE NAME:LA N D F O R M c 20 2 2 02 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 01 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 CN C ER W 02 2 - 0 3 3 5 21 8 3 5 HE N N E P I N MN 82 2 H W Y 5 5 ME D I N A MCD18417 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 Web: landform.net Know what's Below. Call before you dig. Landform and Site to Finish are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.®® 01 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 2 CI T Y S U B M I T T A L NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N 02 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 CI T Y R E S U B M I T T A L NORTH 0 20 40 Total Parking Stalls Required Required Parking: 72 seats / 3 = 24 Stalls One stall per three (3) seats 2 36 38 ea. ea. ea.Accessible Stalls Standard Stalls Provided Parking: Total Parking Stalls - Provided (9x18) (9x18) 24 ea. The Property is Zoned Commercial Highway Zone (CH) Building Setback Information is as follows: Front = 25 ft. Rear = 25 ft. Side = 15 ft. Parking Setback Information is as follows: Front = 25 ft. Rear = 10 ft. Side = 25 ft. (if adjacent to street) Side = 10ft. Sign Setback Information is as follows: Front = 10 ft. Rear = 10 ft. Side = 10 ft. Lot Coverage Information is as follows: Lot Area Minimum = 43,560 s.f. = 1.00 ac. Lot Width Minimum = 100 ft. Impervious Pervious Total 87,070 40,864 46,206 s.f s.f. s.f. Impervious Proposed: Total Pervious Existing: 87,070 41,239 45,831 s.f. s.f. s.f. 2.00 0.94 1.06 2.00 0.95 1.05 Obtain all necessary permits for construction within, or use of, public right-of-way. The digital file, which can be obtained from the Engineer, shall be used for staking. Discrepancies between the drawings and the digital file shall be reported to the Engineer. The building footprint, as shown on these drawings, and the digital file, shall be compared to the structural drawings prior to staking. Building layout angles are parallel with or perpendicular to the property line at the location indicated. Dimensions shown are to face of curb and exterior face of building unless noted otherwise. Delineate parking stalls with a 4-inch wide white painted stripe. Delineate access aisles with 4-inch wide white painted stripes 18 inches on center and at 45 degree angle to direction of travel. Trash / Recycling areas: See Architectural drawings. Existing. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. GENERAL NOTES PARKING SUMMARY AREA SUMMARY ZONING AND SETBACK SUMMARY SITE PLAN NOTES For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1. 100.0% 47.0% 53.0% 100.0% 47.5% 52.5% ac. ac. ac. ac. ac. ac. LEGEND Green Space (Landscape Area) SITE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 McDonald's pylon sign. Existing. Drive-thru signage. See Sheet C2.2. Reserved. Reserved. Mobile order pickup signage - Existing. Concrete drive aprons and slabs. Refer to Sheet C3.1 for specifications. Reserved. Reserved. Bituminous pavement. Refer to Sheet C3.1 for specifications. Parking lot light. Existing. Reserved. Planting area. Replace in-kind or match adjacent landscaping for areas that are disturbed. Trash enclosure. Existing. Stacking distance is 120' Reserved. Reserved. Reserved. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Reserved. Reserved. 18. DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE NOTES 19 17 2 40 42 ea. ea. ea.Accessible Stalls Standard Stalls Existing Parking: Total Parking Stalls - Existing C205MCD417.DWG DR I V E - T H R U D E T A I L S C2.5 CANOPY SCHEMATIC DETAIL1 NO SCALE 2 3 NO SCALE DRIVE-THRU WIRING DETAIL PRIMARY PRE-BROWSE BOARD PRIMARY CANOPY SECONDARY CANOPY PRI M A R Y L A N E SEC O N D A R Y L A N E OU T S I D E IN S I D E PB PB PANEL CP (IG) PANEL LP BUILDING CA A Key Notes: 2#12 & 1#12 gnd., 3/4" conduit to lp-1 for DT canopy lighting 4#12 & 1#12 gnd. & 1#12 isolated gnd., 3/4" conduit to cp for isolated ground power to menuboards and media players. 2#12 & 1#12 gnd. & 1#12 isolated gnd., 3/4" conduit to cp for isolated ground power to canopies. Each canopy shall be on its own separate circuit. 2#12 & 1#12 gnd. & 1#12 isolated gnd., 3/4" conduit to cp for isolated ground power to menuboards & media players. 2#12 & 1#12 gnd. & 1#12 isolated gnd., 3/4" conduit to cp for isolated ground power to pre-browse boards and media players. (2) 1-1/2" conduit one for canopy cabling one for loop detector 2" conduit - for cat6 data cables 1-1/2" conduit - for cat6 data cables 1" conduit - for cat6 data cables General Notes: 1.Verify exact circuits and quantities of circuits with panel schedules on drawing E4.2 and manufacturer's installation instructions. 2.Per manufacturer's installation instructions seperate dedicated neutrals are required to menuboard and pre-browse board for each circuit (plc and lighting). 3.If any bends are required, sweeps must be provided in conduits. 4.For existing locations, verify existing cp panel has ampacity and sufficient spares/spaces for two (2) new 20a/1p circuits. Upgrade cp panel to 42 circuits in necessary. 5.Verify existing pullboxes are sized for new conduit routing. Modify pullboxes if necessary. 6.Data and power cannot be located in same conduit. They must be separated. Sketch created from electrical OPO update (E-OPO) dated Sept, 2012 CUR B & G U T T E R A B C D E F G C E H D F F B Note: This drawing is shown for schematic purposes only. See manufacturer for installation instructions 4 NO SCALE DOUBLE GATEWAY SCHEMATIC DETAIL 15'-0" 6' - 0 " SECONDARY PRE-BROWSE BOARD H I E G I I Note: This drawing is shown for schematic purposes only. See manufacturer for installation instructions 3.39' 3' 2.41' (1 1 . 1 0 ' ) (1 0 . 9 1 ' MI N . ) 0.77' 7.87' 0. 9 2 ' 0.32' TOP VIEW PULLBOX FOR CONTROLLER VERIFY EXACT LOCATION IN FIELD PULLBOX AT CASHIERS WINDOW PRIMARY MENU BOARD SECONDARY MENU BOARD DIGITAL PRE-BROWSE BOARD SCHEMATIC DETAIL5 NO SCALE DIGITAL MENU BOARD SCHEMATIC DETAIL6 NO SCALE 2'-5 1/4" 5' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 4" - 1 3 / 4 " 4'-10" 1' - 9 3 / 4 " Note: This drawing is shown for schematic purposes only. See manufacturer for installation instructions Note: This drawing is shown for schematic purposes only. See manufacturer for installation instructions 5' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 4" - 1 3 / 4 " 1' - 9 3 / 4 " RE V I E W E D B Y DR A W N B Y ST A T E N U M B E R Mc D O N A L D ' S U S A , L L C . RE V RE V I S I O N H I S T O R Y SH E E T N A M E PR O T O . I S S U E D DA T E R E V I E W E D NA T I O N A L N U M B E R DA T E DA T E I S S U E D TH E S E D R A W I N G S A N D S P E C I F I C A T I O N S A R E T H E C O N F I D E N T I A L A N D P R O P R I E T A R Y P R O P E R T Y O F M c D O N A L D ' S CO R P O R A T I O N A N D S H A L L N O T B E C O P I E D O R R E P R O D U C E D W I T H O U T W R I T T E N A U T H O R I Z A T I O N . T H E C O N T R A C T DO C U M E N T S W E R E P R E P A R E D F O R U S E O N T H I S S P E C I F I C S I T E I N C O N J U N C T I O N W I T H I T S I S S U E D A T E A N D AR E N O T S U I T A B L E F O R U S E O N A D I F F E R E N T S I T E O R A T A L A T E R T I M E . U S E O F T H E S E D R A W I N G S F O R RE F E R E N C E O R E X A M P L E O N A N O T H E R P R O J E C T R E Q U I R E S T H E S E R V I C E S O F P R O P E R L Y L I C E N S E D A R C H I T E C T S AN D E N G I N E E R S . R E P R O D U C T I O N O F T H E C O N T R A C T D O C U M E N T S F O R R E U S E O N A N O T H E R P R O J E C T I S N O T A U T H O R I Z E D . CI T Y SH E E T N O . ST R E E T A D D R E S S ST A T E CO U N T Y CERTIFICATION PROJECT NO. FILE NAME:LA N D F O R M c 20 2 2 02 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 01 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 CN C ER W 02 2 - 0 3 3 5 21 8 3 5 HE N N E P I N MN 82 2 H W Y 5 5 ME D I N A MCD18417 01 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 2 CI T Y S U B M I T T A L NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N 02 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 CI T Y R E S U B M I T T A L RESERVED YOUTHANK THRU DRIVE THRU DRIVE THRU DRIVE PICKUP WINDOW PAY WINDOW PID: 1111823140020 822 STATE HWY NO 55 MEDINA, MN 55340 OWNER: ARCHLAND PROPERTY I LLC EXISTING SINGLE STORY BUILDING "MCDONALDS CORPORATION" FFE=994.95 HEIGHT=17.0 FT. 3542 SQ. FT. SHED CABX CABXCOBX GAS CABX LT LT LT LT LT EM GM LT TR A S H EN C L O S U R E A A S S 16.0 13 . 8 16.0 13 . 8 DRIVETHRU A D E B C E O P G (TYP.) C206MCD417.DWG ST R I P I N G C2.6 1. 2. 3. 4. GENERAL NOTES STRIPING NOTES A B D E F G H I J K L C M Field verify and confirm existing conditions and dimensions prior to commencing construction. Notify McDonald's Area Construction Manager of any discrepancies prior to commencing construction. See Sheet C2.1 for all radius dimensions. See Sheet C2.2 for drive-thru construction. All pavement stencils must be purchased from the following authorized provider. Pavement Stencil Company P.O. Box 18034 Roanoke, VA 24014 ph 800-250-5547 fax 540-427-1326 PavementStencil.net 6" wide painted stripe. PMS 123, Yellow. 1'-0" wide painted Directional Arrow. PMS 123, Yellow. See General Note 4. 6" wide painted Merge Point. PMS 123, Yellow. See General Note 4. Painted drive thru graphic. See Detail 1. See General Note 4. Painted drive thru graphic. See Detail 2. See General Note 4. Reserved. 8" wide, 10' long painted Roll Forward Stripe. PMS 123, Yellow. Reserved. Reserved. Reserved. Reserved. Reserved. Reserved. Reserved. Painted graphic. See Detail 6. See General Note 4. Painted graphic. See Detail 6. See General Note 4. Note: All text and arrow shall be painted Yellow (PMS 123) 2' - 5 " 3' - 6 " 6'-0" 2' - 1 0 " 5-3/4" 5-3/4" 2'-10" 3' - 6 " 2' - 5 " NO SCALE PAINTED 'DRIVE THRU' WITH ARROW1 NO SCALE PAINTED ARROW2 Note: Arrow shall be painted Yellow (PMS 123) NO SCALE RESERVED3 NO SCALE 5 N O NO SCALE PAINTED MOBILE ORDER SYMBOL6 RE V I E W E D B Y DR A W N B Y ST A T E N U M B E R Mc D O N A L D ' S U S A , L L C . RE V RE V I S I O N H I S T O R Y SH E E T N A M E PR O T O . I S S U E D DA T E R E V I E W E D NA T I O N A L N U M B E R DA T E DA T E I S S U E D TH E S E D R A W I N G S A N D S P E C I F I C A T I O N S A R E T H E C O N F I D E N T I A L A N D P R O P R I E T A R Y P R O P E R T Y O F M c D O N A L D ' S CO R P O R A T I O N A N D S H A L L N O T B E C O P I E D O R R E P R O D U C E D W I T H O U T W R I T T E N A U T H O R I Z A T I O N . T H E C O N T R A C T DO C U M E N T S W E R E P R E P A R E D F O R U S E O N T H I S S P E C I F I C S I T E I N C O N J U N C T I O N W I T H I T S I S S U E D A T E A N D AR E N O T S U I T A B L E F O R U S E O N A D I F F E R E N T S I T E O R A T A L A T E R T I M E . U S E O F T H E S E D R A W I N G S F O R RE F E R E N C E O R E X A M P L E O N A N O T H E R P R O J E C T R E Q U I R E S T H E S E R V I C E S O F P R O P E R L Y L I C E N S E D A R C H I T E C T S AN D E N G I N E E R S . R E P R O D U C T I O N O F T H E C O N T R A C T D O C U M E N T S F O R R E U S E O N A N O T H E R P R O J E C T I S N O T A U T H O R I Z E D . CI T Y SH E E T N O . ST R E E T A D D R E S S ST A T E CO U N T Y CERTIFICATION PROJECT NO. FILE NAME:LA N D F O R M c 20 2 2 02 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 01 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 CN C ER W 02 2 - 0 3 3 5 21 8 3 5 HE N N E P I N MN 82 2 H W Y 5 5 ME D I N A MCD18417 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 Web: landform.net Know what's Below. Call before you dig. Landform and Site to Finish are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.®® 01 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 2 NORTH 0 20 40 CI T Y S U B M I T T A L NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N 02 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 CI T Y R E S U B M I T T A L 2' - 5 " NO SCALE ROLL FORWARD PAINTED ARROW7 NOTE: ARROW SHALL BE PAINTED YELLOW (PMS 123) RESERVED P YOUTHANK THRU DRIVE THRU DRIVE THRU DRIVE PICKUP WINDOW PAY WINDOW PID: 1111823140020 822 STATE HWY NO 55 MEDINA, MN 55340 OWNER: ARCHLAND PROPERTY I LLC EXISTING SINGLE STORY BUILDING "MCDONALDS CORPORATION" FFE=994.95 HEIGHT=17.0 FT. 3542 SQ. FT. >> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> FO FO >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> SHED STORM POND HH SIG. BASE GAS SIG. BASE VLT VL T VL T VLT CABX CABXCOBXGAS CABX LT LT LT LT LT EM GM LT TR A S H EN C L O S U R E LANDSCAPE ROCK A A S S 16.0 13 . 8 16.0 13 . 8 DRIVETHRU 995 995 995 99 4 994 996 996 9 9 5 9 9 5 99 5 995 995 9 9 5 994 3 (TYP.) C3.1 1 ENLARGED PLAN 25 26a 31 THRU DRIVE PAY WINDOW PID: 1111823140020 822 STATE HWY NO 55 MEDINA, MN 55340 OWNER: ARCHLAND PROPERTY I LLC EXISTING SINGLE STORY BUILDING "MCDONALDS CORPORATION" FFE=994.95 HEIGHT=17.0 FT. LT EM GM S S GRA D E BRE A K ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) DRIVETHRU 995 995 995 99 4 996 996 (95.20) 95.14 (95.12) (94.53) (94.15)(94.24) (94.31) (94.17) (94.67 BC) (94.03) (93.77) (93.82) (94.15) (94.64) (95.00) (94.71 BC) 94.94 95.01 94.68 94.63 95.13 BC 94.11 94.10 94.01 93.94 93.89 94.05 93.97 93.82 93.84 94.41 94.41 94.96 94.98 94.79 94.60 94.99 94.38 95.17 95.04 94.73 94.41 94.95 94.71 94.57 94.24 9 9 5 9 9 5 99 5 995 995 9 9 5 994 25 26d 26d C7.1 1 BIO LOG (TYP.)C7.1 2 B612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER C7.1 2 B612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER C7.1 5 CONCRETE CHANNEL 26a C7.1 4 ASPHALT PAVEMENT TRANSITION (TYP.) 32 C7.1 4 THICKEND BITUMINOUS EDGE (TYP.) C301MCD417.DWG C3.1 GR A D I N G , D R A I N A G E , P A V I N G , & E R O S I O N C O N T R O L NORTH 0 30 60 ENLARGED PLAN 10 SCALE Contact utility service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning grading. Reserved. Remove topsoil from grading areas and stockpile sufficient quantity for reuse. Materials may be mined from landscape areas for use on site and replaced with excess organic material with prior Owner approval. Remove surface and ground water from excavations. Provide initial lifts of stable foundation material if exposed soils are wet and unstable. Reserved. Reserved. An Independent Testing Firm shall verify the removal of organic and unsuitable soils, soil correction, and compaction and provide periodic reports to the Owner. Place and compact fill using lift thicknesses matched to soil type and compaction equipment to obtain specified compaction throughout the lift. Compact cohesive soils in paved areas to 95% of maximum dry density, Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) except the top 3 feet which shall be compacted to 100%. Compact to 98% density where fill depth exceeds 10 feet. The soils shall be within 3% of optimum moisture content. In granular soils all portions of the embankment shall be compacted to not less than 95% of Modified Proctor Density (ASTM D1557). Reserved. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Install perimeter sediment controls prior to beginning work and maintain for duration of construction. Remove controls after areas contributing runoff are permanently stabilized and dispose of off site. Install inlet protection: Wimco RD or CG models as appropriate, or approved equal. Maintain protection until project is stabilized. Limit soil disturbance to the grading limits shown. Schedule operations to minimize length of exposure of disturbed areas. Management practices shown are the minimum requirement. Install and maintain additional controls as work proceeds to prevent erosion and control sediment carried by wind or water. Reserved. Reserved. Contractor shall prevent sediment laden water from entering the filtration / infiltration system until the site is completely stabilized. Stabilization shall be started immediately and completed within seven (7) days for all exposed soils areas to limit soil erosion in that portion of the site where construction has temporarily or permanently ceased. Seed, Sod, Mulch, Erosion Control Blanket, and Fertilizer shall meet the following Specifications, as modified. Item Specification Number Estimated Quantities Sod MNDOT 3878 0 s.f. Seed MNDOT 3876 MN Type (25-141 @ 59 lbs./ac. for General Roadside, 25-151 @ 120 lb./ac. for Residential Turf) - Permanent Turf 0 lbs. Mulch MNDOT 3882 (MNDOT Type 1 @ 2 ton/ac., Disc Anchored)0 ton Erosion Control Blanket MNDOT 3885 (MNDOT Type 3N (12 mo.) 4N (24 mo.))0 s.f. Fertilizer MNDOT 3881 General Placement MNDOT 2575 All disturbed landscape areas shall be restored in-kind. Coordinate with McDonald's area construction manager. Scrape adjacent streets clean daily and sweep clean weekly. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Spot Elevations at curblines indicate flowlines unless noted otherwise. Grades between proposed spot elevations shall be continuous and nonvariable. Spot Elevations shall govern over contour lines. Meet and Match existing curb. Transition as needed. Paving Sections a. Bituminous Paving (Light Duty) 1.5-inch Bituminous Wear (MNDOT 2360, SPWEA240B) Tack Coat (MNDOT 2357) 2.5-inch Bituminous Base (MNDOT 2360, SPNWB230B) 6-inch Aggregate Base (MNDOT 3138, Class 5) b. Reserved. c. Reserved. d. Concrete Drives, Aprons, and Exterior Slabs 7-inch Concrete, 4000 PSI, 5%-8% Air Entrained, Max. 4" Slump (MNDOT 2301) 7-inch Aggregate Base (MNDOT 3138, CLASS 5) Compacted Subsoil Concrete Joints Install joints as shown and align across sidewalks, curbs, and pavement, paying attention to spacing of expansion joints. Joint spacing shall be as follows: a. Tooled joints: Divide panels into nominally equal areas unless shown otherwise. b. Expansion Joints: Sidewalks - 40 feet max.; Curbs - 60 feet max.; Pavement: 80 feet max.; Adjacent to building foundations and stoops. c. Contraction Joints: Sidewalks - 8 to 10 feet; Curbs and Aprons - 12 to 15 feet. Reserved. Reserved. Reserved. Adjust all structure rims to match final grade. 10' transition from B612 curb to 3" curb at drive thru. 23. 24. 27. GRADING NOTES PAVING NOTES GENERAL NOTES LEGEND :Inlet Protection :Tip Out Curb :Pavement Sawcut :Construction Limits ESTIMATED QUANTITY 7 ea. SYMBOL DESCRIPTION EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES For construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1. :Compost or Bio Log 153 ft.)))))))))))))))))))) 3 25 26 28 29 RE V I E W E D B Y DR A W N B Y ST A T E N U M B E R Mc D O N A L D ' S U S A , L L C . RE V RE V I S I O N H I S T O R Y SH E E T N A M E PR O T O . I S S U E D DA T E R E V I E W E D NA T I O N A L N U M B E R DA T E DA T E I S S U E D TH E S E D R A W I N G S A N D S P E C I F I C A T I O N S A R E T H E C O N F I D E N T I A L A N D P R O P R I E T A R Y P R O P E R T Y O F M c D O N A L D ' S CO R P O R A T I O N A N D S H A L L N O T B E C O P I E D O R R E P R O D U C E D W I T H O U T W R I T T E N A U T H O R I Z A T I O N . T H E C O N T R A C T DO C U M E N T S W E R E P R E P A R E D F O R U S E O N T H I S S P E C I F I C S I T E I N C O N J U N C T I O N W I T H I T S I S S U E D A T E A N D AR E N O T S U I T A B L E F O R U S E O N A D I F F E R E N T S I T E O R A T A L A T E R T I M E . U S E O F T H E S E D R A W I N G S F O R RE F E R E N C E O R E X A M P L E O N A N O T H E R P R O J E C T R E Q U I R E S T H E S E R V I C E S O F P R O P E R L Y L I C E N S E D A R C H I T E C T S AN D E N G I N E E R S . R E P R O D U C T I O N O F T H E C O N T R A C T D O C U M E N T S F O R R E U S E O N A N O T H E R P R O J E C T I S N O T A U T H O R I Z E D . CI T Y SH E E T N O . ST R E E T A D D R E S S ST A T E CO U N T Y CERTIFICATION PROJECT NO. FILE NAME:LA N D F O R M c 20 2 2 02 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 01 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 CN C ER W 02 2 - 0 3 3 5 21 8 3 5 HE N N E P I N MN 82 2 H W Y 5 5 ME D I N A MCD18417 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 Web: landform.net Know what's Below. Call before you dig. Landform and Site to Finish are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.®® 01 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 2 CI T Y S U B M I T T A L NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N 02 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 CI T Y R E S U B M I T T A L 30 1 31 32 Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 April 5, 2022 City Council Meeting TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: March 30, 2022 MEETING: April 5, 2022 City Council SUBJECT: Planning Department Updates Land Use Application Review A) Cates Ranch/Willow Drive Warehouse Industrial – Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Environmental Assessment Worksheet – Oppidan has requested review of an EAW and a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for a warehouse/industrial development east of Willow Drive, north of Chippewa Road. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 11 and voted 4-3 to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Staff is planning to present the Comp Plan Amendment at the April 5 meeting. B) Weston Woods PUD and Plat Amendment – Mark and Kathleen Smith have requested an amendment to the approved PUD and plat. The amendment proposes to reduce the total number of lots by 3 and adjust required lot standards. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment at the March 8 meeting and recommended approval. Staff intends to present to Council on April 5. C) McDonald’s Drive thru CUP Amendment – 822 Highway 55 – McDonald’s has requested an amendment to their CUP to expand the drive-thru to a two-lane configuration. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment at the March 8 meeting and recommended approval. Staff intends to present to Council on April 5. D) Loram/Scannell Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) – Loram and Scannell have submitted materials for the City to prepare an EAW for a warehouse/industrial development east of Arrowhead Drive, south of Highway 55, to the south of Loram’s existing facility. The Council authorized release of the EAW for comment on February 2. The comment period will expire on March 17 and staff intends to present draft findings for Council approval at the April 5 meeting. E) Prairie Creek Final Plat – Stelter Enterprises has requested final plat approval for a 17-lot villa subdivision at 500 Hamel Road. Staff intends to present to the City Council at the April 19 meeting. F) Marsh Pointe Preserve Preliminary Plat – 4250-4292 Arrowhead Drive – BPS Properties has requested Preliminary Plat approval for a 30-lot subdivision east of Arrowhead Drive south of Bridgewater. The City previously reviewed a concept plan for the project. The Council granted preliminary plat and PUD general plan approval at the March 1 meeting. The applicant has submitted for final plat approval, which is under review. Staff will present to Council when complete, potentially at the April 19 meeting. G) Hamel Townhomes Pre Plat and Site Plan Review – Hamel Townhomes LLC has requested preliminary plat and site plan review approval for a 30-unit townhome development at 342 Hamel Road. Staff is conducting preliminary review and will schedule for a public hearing when complete, potentially at the April 12 Planning Commission meeting. H) Bonner Variance – 2055 Tamarack Drive – Jeffrey Bonner has requested a variance from the 150-foot animal structure setback to replace an existing barn with a larger structure. The larger structure would include a larger barn plus additional storage and shop space. The larger MEMORANDUM Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 April 5, 2022 City Council Meeting structure is proposed to be setback the same distance as the existing barn from the northern property line (110’). A public hearing is tentatively scheduled for the April 12 Planning Commission meeting. I) Ditter Heating and Cooling Site Plan Review – 820 Tower Drive – Ditter Heating and Cooling has requested a Site Plan Review for an approximately 5,000 square foot addition to its building. The application is incomplete for review and will be scheduled for a hearing when complete. J) Abraham Accessory Dwelling Unit CUP – 3003 Hamel Road – Chad and MT Abraham have requested a CUP for a guest home to be constructed along with their new home at 3003 Hamel Road. The Council adopted resolution of approval on March 15. The project will now be closed. K) Deng Septic Variance – 2472 Parkview Drive – Jet Deng has requested a variance to reconstruct and expand an existing septic drainfield in its existing location. The Council adopted resolution of approval on March 15. The project will now be closed. L) BAPS Site Plan Review – 1400 Hamel Road – Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha (BAPS), Minneapolis, has requested Site Plan Review for construction of a place of assembly. The Planning Commission reviewed at the September 14 meeting and recommended approval. The Council adopted a resolution for approval at the November 16 meeting. The applicant has indicated that they will likely not begin construction until spring. M) Life-Style Auto Condo – South of Hwy 55, west of Pioneer – SH Ventures has requested review of a PUD Concept Plan for development of 12 buildings with approximately 258,000 square feet of space for privately owned garage condos. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and provided comments at the October 12 meeting. The Council reviewed at the November 16 Council meeting and provided comments. The applicant has requested that the City Council remain open, as they are considering potential updates to their Concept Plan. N) Adam’s Pest Control Site Plan Review, Pre Plat, Rezoning – Pioneer Trail Preserve – These projects have been preliminarily approved and the City is awaiting final plat application. O) Caribou Cabin-Pinto Retail, Baker Park Townhomes, Johnson ADU CUP, St. Peter and Paul Cemetery – The City Council has adopted resolutions approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants with the conditions of approval in order to complete the projects. Other Projects A) Uptown Hamel RFP – Hennepin County identified the opportunity for the City to work with the UofM Extension Service on a portion of the work which staff had contemplated including within the RFP. Staff intends to investigate this opportunity further and determine if the scope of the RFP could be adjusted. Staff intends to present the RFP (with any changes) to the Council on April 5. B) Electric Vehicle Charging Regulations – staff is preparing information for review by the Planning Commission and Council pertaining to potential regulations to either require or encourage installation of EV charging infrastructure. A public hearing is scheduled for the April 12 Planning Commission meeting. C) Sign Ordinance – Internal signage on public property – staff is preparing an amendment to the sign ordinance which would clarify that the sign regulations would not apply to scoreboards and similar features which are internal to a public property. A public hearing is tentatively scheduled for the April 12 Planning Commission meeting. D) County Road 47/County Road 101/Hackamore – staff has been working with the City of Plymouth related to improvements they intend to construct to County Road 47. The improvements extend across County Road 101 to a portion of Hackamore Road and would also include replacement of signals. Plymouth has requested a cost-share for a portion of the signal improvements from Medina and Corcoran. Staff intends to present the agreement to Council on April 19. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Jason Nelson, Director of Public Safety DATE: March 30, 2022 RE: Police Department Updates I am sure that most of you have seen the Hamel Fire social media post that one of its members, Sergey Karachenets, has left the United States to help in Ukraine, specifically in Lviv. He will be keeping in contact with Hamel Fire and as he finds out what type of supplies and resources are needed, he will let them know. His family roots are in the northeast portion of the country, north of Karkiv near the border with Belarus, and last report is his grandmother is still there. He has sent a message that he is currently in a Polish city Przemysl, where he is helping with refugees who filter through every day as they flee their country. We wish Sergey all the best in hopes that he has safe travels and soon will be back in our community. This is just another great example of the kind of volunteer men and women whom we have on our local fire departments. A special thanks to all of them for everything they do. I have posted for an internal assignment to the drug task force for July 2022. This position is a three- year rotating position in which an officer is assigned to the West Metro Drug Task Force (WMDTF). The officer chosen will be working out of an office at a different location and reports directly to a supervisor that is supplied by the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Department. The current officer has actually had his position extended and has been in the task force since 2017. The amount of investigative knowledge of managing complex cases, informants, writing search warrants and other investigative techniques is invaluable. Not only has the current officer mastered this; he is one of the most successful agents in the history of the drug task force. Due to the nature of the job, I cannot truly give him the recognition that he deserves. These past few weeks the officers have been in two different pursuits involving stolen vehicles. One vehicle was stolen from Koch’s corner when a customer parked by the front doors of the business, went inside to buy a newspaper and when he come out his vehicle was gone. Officers located the vehicle and the driver fled. The vehicle was eventually stopped after a pursuit intervention technique (PIT) was completed. The driver was taken into custody. The second pursuit involved a report from Wright County of a carjacking with a gun. The vehicle was located on Hwy 55 heading east and when the officer tried to pull it over it fled. Multiple agencies assisted and were able to utilize stop sticks to deflate the offenders’ tires. As the pursuit entered Minneapolis another successful PIT technique was used. The driver and passenger were subsequently arrested. With the proper tools and techniques these dangerous incidents have been brought to a successful resolution. In each incident the officers did a fantastic job. I am happy to announce that we finally have an embedded social worker that will assist our lakes area. Our new embedded social worker will be housed out of the South Lake Police Department full time but will also have a space in our office as needed for her to work on the north lakes area department cases. This is something that we have all been waiting for at the PD. It took many interviews to find the right fit for our seven-city consortium. The new Hennepin County employee will be starting on April 11. We are excited to see where this partnership goes from here. Patrol: The following are updates of Patrol Officers between March 8, 2022, and March 28, 2022: Officers issued 26 citations and 62 warnings for various traffic offenses, responded to 5 property damage accidents, 1 personal injury accident, 20 medicals, 11 suspicious calls, 7 traffic complaints, 15 assists to other agencies, and 15 business/residential alarms. On 03/08/2022 Officers were dispatched to a theft in progress at Target. Asset Protection was reporting a known shoplifter in the store concealing video games. As officers were getting to the area Asset Protection advised the subject had ditched the concealed items and left the store without stealing anything. A vehicle description was provided along with a license plate. Officer located and stopped that vehicle and found that the vehicle was not involved, and Asset Protection had given the wrong vehicle description/plate. No theft occurred. On 03/11/2022 officers were dispatched to a threat in the area of Highway 55 and County Road 101. A driver reported he had been westbound Highway 55 and stopped for the light at County Road 101. He said another driver walked up to his door, opened his door, and swore at him and told him to get out of the car. The victim drove off through the intersection and the suspect followed him into the parking lot of Countryside Café where the driver tried to get him to fight and mentioned that he thought the victim had “cut him off”. No vehicle description or license plate was obtained by the victim or other witnesses and the suspect’s identity is unknown at this time. On 03/11/2022 officers were dispatched to a hit and run accident at the intersection of Brockton Lane and Hamel Road. A witness reported a black Jeep had just struck the stop sign/street sign at the intersection and left northbound on Brockton Lane, leaving behind the bumper to the vehicle. Upon arrival officers located the bumper with a license plate attached. Officers responded to the registered owner’s address and were able to locate the driver who was found to be intoxicated and subsequently arrested for DWI. The driver was booked and released pending charges. On 03/12/2022 officer was dispatched to a vehicle fire in the area of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive. Upon arrival the officer found a vehicle fully engulfed in flames. The driver reported they had been westbound when they were flagged down by another motorist reporting flames underneath the vehicle. The driver was able to pull over and all the occupants were able to exit the vehicle safely. Hamel Fire Department responded and put out the fire quickly, but the vehicle was a total loss. On 03/17/2022 officer was dispatched to assist State Patrol on a traffic stop along Highway 55. A driver was ultimately arrested for possession of methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia. On 03/17/2022 officer was dispatched to a suspicious activity at a residence in the 1300 block of Phillips Drive. A homeowner, who was out of town, reported he had received video from his security system of a male walking near his house in the driveway. Officer responded and checked the residence which was secure. Unknown who the male was seen on video. On 03/18/2022 officer received information of a carjacking that had just occurred in the Buffalo area and Wright County Sheriff’s Office had pursued the suspect into Hennepin County before terminating. Officer located the vehicle on Highway 55 near County Road 19 and the vehicle fled again. The officer pursued and assisting agencies were able to deploy tire deflation devices which was successful. A Hennepin County Deputy performed a PIT maneuver as the vehicle was about to enter the Minneapolis city limits and the vehicle was disabled. A male driver was arrested, and female passenger detained. Charges pending in both Hennepin and Wright Counties. On 03/19/2022 officers responded to assist Corcoran PD on a personal injury accident along County Road 116 north of Hackamore Road. Two vehicles were found to have hit head-on after one of the vehicles was reported to have crossed the centerline. Both driver’s sustained minimal injuries and the driver that crossed the centerline was arrested for DWI by Corcoran PD. Beginning the week of 03/16 officers began enforcement of the spring weight restrictions in the city. Several trucks have been stopped and several citations issued for overweight violations. Two additional officers were also sent to training to be certified to weigh trucks. On 03/25/2022 officers were dispatched to a suspicious vehicle parked at a business in the 800 block of Tower Drive and received information that the registered owner may be involved in business burglaries. Officers checked the area businesses near where the vehicle was parked but found no signs of burglary. On 03/26/2022 officer responded to a forgery report at Casey’s General Store. It was reported that 03/23 a customer came into the store and requested to purchase several packs of cigarettes. The customer presented a digital coupon from their phone that gave $10 off per pack of cigarettes. The store later learned that this coupon was not valid and that suspects have been presenting this coupon to several Casey’s stores throughout the metro area. The case has been forwarded to investigations. On 03/27/2022 officer received information from Wright County Sheriff’s Office that a vehicle that had been solen from Medina in December 2021 was recovered south of Buffalo. The vehicle apparently had been stripped for parts. The victim was notified of the recovered vehicle. Investigations: Received a fraud report of over $28,000 dollars in the middle of January. After an investigation was concluded a suspect was charged with the crime. Received a report of a theft from Target. The suspect was identified by Asset Protections as being a suspect in several other cities. He was charged with theft. Received a report of a scam on Craigslist where the victim lost $250 dollars. An investigation is on- going. There are currently 8 cases assigned to investigations. 1 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE March 28, 2022 MEETING: April 05, 2022 SUBJECT Public Works Update STREETS • The streets are in good condition and are already beginning to return to their normal post-winter form. • Road material and equipment bids have been tabulated and are in your packet for approval on the consent agenda. • Spring weight restrictions are in effect, one permit was issued for emergency well repair on Navajo Road. We’re thankful to the police who are patrolling and citing offenders. • Our subcontractor has removed most of the compost from our pile at City Hall. Next month I will report on the total quantity and cost for the project (per our agreement, Loretto and Medina split the costs). WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER • The radios and drive-by-units (to read meters) have been ordered. • I’ll engage WSB soon to start plans for the treatment plant expansion. • Our Risk and Resilience Plan, as required by the EPA, is complete. Public Works Staff finished the first training session on April 1st. Chief Nelson will instruct the final session on April 14th. This training enables us to prepare for any possible emergency scenarios. PARKS/TRAILS • HAC is proposing a new scoreboard in the Hamel Legion Park. A memo is included in your packet explaining the project and details about the size and display. • Staff will make one last site visit to the new park land prior to closing on the property. • We will have a pre-season meeting with the new lawn and grounds maintenance contractor to get them up to speed with the HAC group and go over expectations. MEMORANDUM 2 PERSONNEL • Trevor Ratke began employment with Medina Public Works on Thursday, March 31st. • I am out of town the week of April 3rd through April 11th. MISC • Preparations for Cleanup Day on Saturday April 30th are well underway. • Staff spent time putting together the annual report to recap the 2021 Public Works activities. ORDER CHECKS MARCH 15, 2022 – APRIL 5, 2022 052736 ADAMS PEST CONTROL INC .................................................. $125.82 052737 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN ................................... $41,881.98 052738 CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT CO ................................. $1,228.01 052739 EARL F ANDERSEN INC .......................................................... $647.95 052740 ECM PUBLISHERS INC ............................................................ $150.39 052741 EXECUTIVE TITLE ...................................................................... $51.86 052742 GRAINGER.................................................................................. $13.40 052743 KENNEDY & GRAVEN CHARTERED .................................. $23,671.00 052744 KONRAD MATERIALS SALES LLC ........................................ $1,786.40 052745 LAW ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGY GRO ....................... $10,079.32 052746 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS.TRUST ................................. $109,255.00 052747 METRO WEST INSPECTION ................................................. $9,165.05 052748 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ................................................. $23.00 052749 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC ...................................................... $243.04 052750 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS ................................... $226.50 052751 OAK RIDGE PET BOARDING ................................................ $1,000.00 052752 REALTECH TITLE LLC .................................................................. $6.40 052753 SOLUTION BUILDERS INC ....................................................... $250.00 052754 STREICHER'S ........................................................................... $271.95 052755 TEGRETE CORP .................................................................... $1,355.00 052756 WSB & ASSOCIATES ........................................................... $36,470.00 052757 BOEDDEKER, KAYLEN .............................................................. $30.92 052758 BRAUN, CHRISTOPHER/RAMONA .......................................... $500.00 052759 CHARLES CUDD CO, LLC ................................................... $10,000.00 052760 JACKSON, ELISSA ................................................................... $500.00 052761 KANDASAMY, KATHIRAVAN .................................................... $300.00 052762 PURAMA MAHESH ................................................................... $250.00 052763 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY .................................... $1,091.85 052764 BEAUDRY OIL & PROPANE .................................................. $5,176.50 052765 BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION INC ................................... $8,025.00 052766 CIRCLE K FLEET ........................................................................ $12.41 052767 DITTER INC ............................................................................... $258.20 052768 EARL F ANDERSEN INC .......................................................... $334.55 052769 ECM PUBLISHERS INC ............................................................ $197.88 052770 ESRI, INC. ................................................................................. $808.00 052771 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC .............................................. $569.28 052772 GRAINGER................................................................................ $192.02 052773 HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES I ................................ $500.00 052774 HIGHWAY 55 CORRIDOR COALITION ..................................... $250.00 052775 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES LLC ............................................... $45.50 052776 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC ............................................................ $130.00 052777 MINNESOTA TOPSOIL ........................................................ $27,494.00 052778 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ........................................ $23.00 052779 MOTLEY AUTO SERVICE LLC ................................................... $72.00 052780 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC ........................................................ $98.14 052781 OFFICE DEPOT ........................................................................ $167.86 052782 PREMIUM WATERS INC ............................................................. $47.99 052783 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES INC .................................. $8,022.65 052784 SOLUTION BUILDERS INC ......................................................... $79.96 052785 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL ............................................................... $618.01 052786 TIMESAVER OFFSITE .............................................................. $440.38 052787 SSI MN TRANCHE 1 #10322006 ............................................ $2,815.07 052788 SSI MN TRANCHE 3 #10327096 ............................................ $3,503.60 052789 VESSCO, INC. ........................................................................ $2,496.15 052790 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER ................................................. $319.58 052791 R&R CONSTRUCTION OF MSP .......................................... $10,000.00 Total Checks $323,272.57 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS MARCH 15, 2022 – APRIL 5, 2022 006303E PR PERA .............................................................................. $18,918.14 006304E PR FED/FICA ....................................................................... $18,857.70 006305E PR MN Deferred Comp ........................................................... $3,034.00 006306E CITY OF MEDINA ........................................................................ $25.00 006307E FURTHER .............................................................................. $1,904.37 006308E MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT ............................................. $235.50 006309E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA .................................................. $4,378.41 006310E AFLAC ....................................................................................... $491.08 006311E FURTHER ................................................................................... $13.50 006312E FURTHER ................................................................................. $112.93 006313E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC ........................................................... $930.79 006314E MINNESOTA, STATE OF ....................................................... $1,210.00 006315E PR PERA .............................................................................. $18,817.71 006316E PR FED/FICA ....................................................................... $18,189.54 006317E PR MN Deferred Comp ........................................................... $3,034.00 006318E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA .................................................. $4,313.36 006319E CITY OF MEDINA ........................................................................ $24.00 006320E FURTHER .............................................................................. $1,904.37 006321E CENTERPOINT ENERGY ...................................................... $5,834.08 006322E DELTA DENTAL ..................................................................... $2,741.61 006323E GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVI ...................................... $178.95 006324E GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVI ...................................... $178.95 REPLACES ECK 6273 006325E VALVOLINE FLEET SERVICES .................................................. $73.45 006326E WRIGHT HENN COOP ELEC ASSN ...................................... $2,287.46 006327E CITY OF PLYMOUTH .................................................................... $6.20 Total Electronic Checks $107,695.10 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT – MARCH 16, 2022 & MARCH 30, 2022 0511716 BILLMAN, JACKSON CARROLL ............................................... $550.37 0511717 COOK, JUSTIN W ..................................................................... $543.53 0511718 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L. ................................................... $1,452.00 0511719 BARNHART, ERIN A. ............................................................. $2,788.42 0511720 BAUMGARDNER, COLETTE J .................................................. $285.56 0511721 BOECKER, KEVIN D. ............................................................. $2,768.54 0511722 CONVERSE, KEITH A. ........................................................... $2,082.79 0511723 DEMARS, LISA ....................................................................... $1,616.17 0511724 DION, DEBRA A. .................................................................... $2,091.51 0511725 ENDE, JOSEPH...................................................................... $2,303.28 0511726 FINKE, DUSTIN D. ................................................................. $2,869.01 0511727 GLEASON, JOHN M. .............................................................. $1,877.22 0511728 GREGORY, THOMAS ............................................................ $1,981.81 0511729 HALL, DAVID M. ..................................................................... $2,128.20 0511730 HANSON, JUSTIN .................................................................. $2,279.88 0511731 JACOBSON, NICOLE ............................................................. $1,089.39 0511732 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S. .......................................................... $2,593.00 0511733 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. ............................................................ $2,273.17 0511734 KLAERS, ANNE M. ................................................................. $1,616.29 0511735 LEUER, GREGORY J. ............................................................ $2,858.39 0511736 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. .................................................. $1,473.74 0511737 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D .......................................................... $2,087.92 0511738 NELSON, JASON ................................................................... $2,795.93 0511739 REINKING, DEREK M ............................................................ $2,970.09 0511740 RUTH, BRENDA L. ................................................................. $1,607.07 0511741 SCHARF, ANDREW ............................................................... $2,332.01 0511742 SCHERER, STEVEN T. .......................................................... $2,527.21 0511743 VINCK, JOHN J ...................................................................... $1,842.74 0511744 VOGEL, NICHOLE .................................................................. $1,006.96 0511745 WALKER, CAITLYN M. ........................................................... $1,183.74 0511746 BURSCH, JEFFREY .................................................................. $652.11 0511747 BILLMAN, JACKSON CARROLL .............................................. $471.73 0511748 COOK, JUSTIN W .................................................................... $779.03 0511749 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L. .................................................. $1,174.74 0511750 BARNHART, ERIN A. ............................................................ $2,791.17 0511751 BAUMGARDNER, COLETTE J ................................................. $424.63 0511752 BOECKER, KEVIN D. ............................................................ $2,818.46 0511753 CONVERSE, KEITH A. .......................................................... $2,250.55 0511754 DEMARS, LISA ...................................................................... $1,801.48 0511755 DION, DEBRA A. ................................................................... $2,152.10 0511756 ENDE, JOSEPH..................................................................... $2,434.84 0511757 FINKE, DUSTIN D. ................................................................ $2,903.84 0511758 GLEASON, JOHN M. ............................................................. $2,309.61 0511759 GREGORY, THOMAS ........................................................... $2,095.21 0511760 HALL, DAVID M. .................................................................... $2,411.66 0511761 HANSON, JUSTIN ................................................................. $2,492.05 0511762 JACOBSON, NICOLE ............................................................ $1,222.11 0511763 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S. ......................................................... $2,661.81 0511764 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. ........................................................... $2,298.82 0511765 KLAERS, ANNE M. ................................................................ $1,647.05 0511766 LEUER, GREGORY J. ........................................................... $2,032.05 0511767 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. ................................................. $1,660.86 0511768 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D ......................................................... $2,146.17 0511769 NELSON, JASON .................................................................. $2,887.87 0511770 REINKING, DEREK M ........................................................... $2,109.72 0511771 RUTH, BRENDA L. ................................................................ $1,699.25 0511772 SCHARF, ANDREW .............................................................. $2,388.46 0511773 SCHERER, STEVEN T. ......................................................... $2,674.86 0511774 VINCK, JOHN J ..................................................................... $2,025.98 0511775 VOGEL, NICHOLE ................................................................. $1,006.96 0511776 WALKER, CAITLYN M. .......................................................... $1,715.57 Total Payroll Direct Deposit $118,016.69