Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
05.03.2022 City Council Meeting Packet
Posted 4/29/2022 Page 1 of 1 AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 3, 2022 7:00 P.M. Medina City Hall 2052 County Road 24 I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of the April 19, 2022 Regular Council Meeting B. Minutes of the April 19, 2022 Work Session Meeting V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve 2021 Annual Report B. Approve Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance No. 686 by Title and Summary C. Approve First Amendment to Development Agreement – Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC VI. COMMENTS A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda B. Park Commission C. Planning Commission VII. PRESENTATION A. Introduce Police Officers John Vinck and Justin Hanson VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Hamel Townhomes B. Bonner Variance Request – Public Hearing C. Marsh Pointe Final Plat and Easement Vacation – Public Hearing 1. Resolution Granting Final Plat Approval for Marsh Pointe Preserve 2. Resolution Vacating Drainage and Utility Easements at 4250 Arrowhead Drive 3. Ordinance Establishing Marsh Pointe Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District 4. Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance Establishing Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District by Title and Summary 5. Planned Unit Development Agreement D. Ordinance Amending Regulations Pertaining to Signs within City-Owned Parks IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS XI. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS XII. ADJOURN Meeting Rules of Conduct to Address the City Council: • Fill out & turn in comment card • Give name and address • Indicate if representing a group • Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes MEMORANDUM TO: Medina Mayor and City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: April 27, 2022 DATE OF MEETING: May 3, 2022 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve 2021 Annual Report – Staff has completed the annual report for City Council review and action. The report provides an overview of the City of Medina’s activities, accomplishments, and fiscal responsibility for 2021. Staff recommends approval. See attached report. B. Adopt Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance No. 686 by Title and Summary – Attached is a resolution for summary publication of Ordinance No. 686 Establishing a Planned Unit Development District for “Weston Woods of Medina” and Amending the Official Zoning Map. See attached resolution. C. Approve First Amendment to Development Agreement – Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC – Staff proposes to amend the development agreement with Pulte for the Reserve of Medina 3rd Addition to allow the developer to pay $439,503.77 to the City rather than constructing certain improvements to Hackamore Road, which is currently required under the existing development agreement. This amount, together with funds held by the City from Toll Brothers from the 1st Addition, equals $736,949.05, which was the City Engineer’s cost estimate for the improvements required of the developer. Having the funds on-hand would provide the City flexibility to use the funds to partner on a broader project with Corcoran. See attached amendment. VII. PRESENTATION A. Introduce Police Officers John Vinck and Justin Hanson – Police Chief Jason Nelson will introduce Police Officers John Vinck and Justin Hanson to the City Council. 2 VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Hamel Townhomes – Hamel Townhomes LLC has made an application for preliminary plat and site plan review of the “Hamel Townhomes” project located on an approximate 2-acre site at 342 Hamel Road. The project consists of 30 townhomes which results in a development density of approximately 14 units per acre. The site is located in the City’s UH, Uptown Hamel zoning district. Potential Actions: 1. Approval of the Hamel Townhomes Preliminary Plat subject to the recommended conditions 2. Approval of the Hamel Townhomes Site Plan subject to the recommended conditions B. Bonner Variance Request – Public Hearing – Jeffrey Bonner, the applicant/property owner, requests approval of a variance from the 150 foot minimum side yard setback requirement to rebuild a new barn on his property at 2055 Tamarack Drive. The existing 26’ x 30’ barn is proposed to be torn down and a new 42’ x 70’ barn rebuilt in its current location and expanding to the west and south. The proposed barn would have added storage and a more functional barn than what exists currently. The subject property and all surrounding properties are zoned RR, Rural Residential. Potential Action: Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the variance, subject to the conditions noted in the staff report. C. Marsh Pointe Final Plat and Easement Vacation - Public Hearing - On March 1, 2022, the City Council granted PUD General Plan of Development and Preliminary Plat approval to BPS Properties for Marsh Pointe Preserve. The plat proposed 30 detached single family villas and various outlots. A copy of Ordinance 683, which establishes the Marsh Pointe Preserve PUD, is attached for reference. The subject site is located east of Arrowhead Drive and south of Bridgewater. The applicant has now requested final approval for the project, to which the following actions are connected: 1) Final Plat; 2) Vacation of easements on underlying platted property; 3) Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District establishment; and 4) Development Agreement. Potential Actions: 1. Motion to adopt the resolution granting final plat approval for Marsh Pointe Preserve. 2. Motion to adopt the resolution vacating drainage and utility easements at 4250 Arrowhead Drive. 3. Motion to adopt the ordinance establishing the Marsh Pointe Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District. 4. Motion to adopt the resolution authorizing publication of the ordinance by title and summary 3 5. Motion to approve the Planned Unit Development Agreement by and between the City of Medina and BPS Properties LLC D. Ordinance Amending Regulations Pertaining to Signs within City-Owned Parks - At the April 5 meeting, the City Council discussed the proposed donation from the Hamel Lions, in partnership with Hamel Athletic Club and Hamel Hawks, to purchase a new digital display and scoreboard at the Paul Fortin Memorial Field in Hamel Legion Park. Staff discussed clarifying the language of the sign ordinance at the April 5 meeting so that the practice of not applying the sign limitations to these internal signs is more of an explicit exemption. The attached ordinance would exempt signs internal to city-owned parks and other city-owned properties. Such signs would still be able to be reviewed and approved by the City because they would be on City land. Potential Action: Move to adopt ordinance amending regulations pertaining to signs within city-owned parks. XI. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 006347E-006367E for $75,587.70 and order check numbers 052849-052907 for $895,001.69, and payroll EFT 0511813-0511845 for $62,997.08. INFORMATION PACKET: • Planning Department Update • Police Department Update • Public Works Department Update • Claims List Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 19, 2022 1 DRAFT 1 2 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 19, 2022 3 4 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on April 19, 2022 at 7:00 5 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Acting Mayor Albers presided. 6 7 Albers explained that the meeting is being held in a virtual format due to the ongoing 8 pandemic and provided instructions for public participation. 9 10 I. ROLL CALL 11 12 Members present: Albers, Cavanaugh, DesLauriers, Martin and Reid. 13 14 Members absent: None. 15 16 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, Attorney Dave Anderson, Finance 17 Director Erin Barnhart, City Engineer Tom Hoffman, City Engineer Jim Stremel, City 18 Planning Director Dusty Finke, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, and Chief of Police 19 Jason Nelson. 20 21 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:05 p.m.) 22 23 III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:05 p.m.) 24 The agenda was approved as presented. 25 26 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:06 p.m.) 27 28 A. Approval of the April 5, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 29 Albers stated that prior to the meeting Johnson distributed proposed changes from 30 Martin for incorporation. 31 32 Johnson stated that he also received proposed changes from Cavanaugh related to 33 page 10 that were also distributed prior to the meeting. 34 35 Moved by Albers, seconded by Martin, to approve the April 5, 2022 regular City Council 36 meeting minutes as amended. 37 38 A roll call vote was performed: 39 40 Martin aye 41 Reid aye 42 Cavanaugh aye 43 DesLauriers aye 44 Albers aye 45 46 Motion passed unanimously. 47 48 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 19, 2022 2 B. Approval of the April 6, 2022 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization 1 Meeting Minutes 2 Albers noted that prior to the meeting Johnson distributed proposed changes as 3 submitted by Martin for incorporation. 4 5 Moved by Albers, seconded by Reid, to approve the April 6, 2022 Local Board of Appeal 6 and Equalization meeting minutes as amended. 7 8 A roll call vote was performed: 9 10 DesLauriers aye 11 Cavanaugh aye 12 Reid aye 13 Martin aye 14 Albers aye 15 16 Motion passed unanimously. 17 18 C. Approval of the April 13, 2022 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization 19 Meeting Minutes 20 Albers stated that prior to the meeting Johnson distributed proposed changes as 21 submitted by Martin for incorporation. 22 23 Moved by Albers, seconded by Cavanaugh, to approve the April 13, 2022 Local Board of 24 Appeal and Equalization meeting minutes as amended. 25 26 A roll call vote was performed: 27 28 DesLauriers aye 29 Albers aye 30 Cavanaugh aye 31 Reid aye 32 Martin aye 33 34 Motion passed unanimously. 35 36 V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:10 p.m.) 37 38 A. Approve Hackamore Road Reimbursement Agreement 39 B. Approve Curb and Concrete Installation Services Agreement 40 C. Approve Street Striping Services Agreement 41 D. Approve D’Fence Amended Agreement 42 E. Approve Mill and Paving Services Agreement 43 F. Approve Seal Coating Services Agreement 44 G. Adopt Resolution Approving MnDOT Master Partnership Agreement 45 H. Adopt Resolution Updating 2022 City Appointments 46 I. Adopt Resolution Granting Amended Final Plat Approval for Weston 47 Woods 48 J. Adopt Ordinance Establishing a PUD for Weston Woods and Amending the 49 Official Zoning Map 50 K. Approve Weston Woods Planned Unit Development Agreement 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 19, 2022 3 L. Adopt Resolution Granting Amended CUP Approval for Expansion of 1 McDonald’s Drive-Thru Lane 2 M. Approve 3692 Pinto Drive Development Agreement 3 N. Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation from the Hamel Lions Club 4 Albers thanked the Hamel Lions for their very generous donation of $124,840 for the 5 new digital video scoreboard for Paul Fortin Field. 6 7 Martin echoed the comments of appreciation to the Hamel Lions. 8 9 Moved by Reid, seconded by DesLauriers, to approve the consent agenda. 10 11 A roll call vote was performed: 12 13 DesLauriers aye 14 Cavanaugh aye 15 Reid aye 16 Martin aye 17 Albers aye 18 19 Motion passed unanimously. 20 21 VI. COMMENTS (7:14 p.m.) 22 23 A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 24 There were none. 25 26 B. Park Commission 27 Scherer reported that the Park Commission will meet the following night to discuss the 28 Hamel Townhome LLC Preliminary Plat and Site Plan pertaining to park dedication. He 29 stated that the group will also continue discussions related to the upgrade/redesign of 30 Lakeshore Park. 31 32 C. Planning Commission 33 Planning Commissioner Sedabres reported that the Planning Commission met the 34 previous week to hold multiple public hearings including the proposal from Hamel 35 Townhomes at 342 Hamel Road. He stated that there was a good debate on the 36 architectural style and density and ultimately recommended denial of the request. The 37 Commission also considered a variance to setback for a barn and unanimously 38 recommended approval. He stated that the Commission also had discussion related to 39 electric vehicle charging stations and there was a mix of support as well as concern on 40 development costs. He stated that the Commission also considered amendment to City 41 Code related to signage within parks and recommended approval. He noted that the 42 Commission also discussed a potential land sale, and the Commission directed the 43 Chair to express support for the sale as it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 44 45 Reid appreciated the time spent on these topics and thorough discussion of the 46 Commission. 47 48 Albers also recognized the work of the Commission and expressed appreciation. 49 50 VII. PRESENTATIONS 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 19, 2022 4 1 A. 2021 Audit Presentation - Abdo (7:20 p.m.) (Mayor Martin had to leave the 2 meeting) 3 Johnson introduced Justin Nilson from Abdo to provide a presentation on the audit. 4 5 Nilson thanked staff for their work and preparation for the audit. He reported a clean 6 unmodified opinion for 2021 with no instances of noncompliance. He stated that there 7 was one finding, which is not unique to Medina, related to the preparation of financial 8 statements. He stated that this is a common finding in smaller cities. He provided 9 information on the general fund, special revenue funds, capital project fund, debt 10 service, water fund, sewer fund, and storm water fund. He also provided information on 11 tax per capita, debt per capita and expenditures per capita, also comparing the City to 12 other municipalities. 13 14 Albers thanked Nilson for the presentation and commended Barnhart for an excellent job 15 in managing the City’s finances. 16 17 DesLauriers asked for clarification on the capital project fund balances mentioned and 18 whether the balances are interchangeable. 19 20 Nilson replied that there are restricted, separated and assigned funds and provided more 21 details. He noted that a majority of the funds are interchangeable. 22 23 DesLauriers also expressed thanks for the work Barnhart and Nilson have done in 24 preparing the audit this year. 25 26 Cavanaugh referenced the financial statements and noted that there are unrestricted 27 investment earnings showing as a loss. He recognized that is due to changes in market 28 values and asked if that is consistent with other cities in 2021. 29 30 Nilson replied that in the current environment he would expect to see that consistently 31 for cities that are managing their money and have money to invest. 32 33 Reid commented that it appears the City is well run and provided Barnhart with a lot of 34 credit for the work she does. 35 36 Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Reid, to accept the 2021 Audit from Abdo. 37 38 A roll call vote was performed: 39 40 DesLauriers aye 41 Cavanaugh aye 42 Reid aye 43 Martin absent 44 Albers aye 45 46 Motion passed unanimously. 47 48 VIII. NEW BUSINESS 49 50 A. Stormwater Pollution Prevent Plan – Public Hearing (7:35 p.m.) 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 19, 2022 5 Johnson noted that the City is required to conduct an annual public hearing for its Storm 1 Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). 2 3 Scherer stated that this public hearing is a requirement of the SWPPP. He reviewed the 4 2021 storm water activity accomplishments and projects for 2022 and beyond. He 5 reviewed the minimum control measures including public education and outreach, public 6 participation, illicit discharge detection and elimination, construction site storm water 7 runoff control, post construction storm water management, and pollution prevention and 8 housekeeping. He also identified partners in water quality improvements. 9 10 Albers referenced pond maintenance and asked which ponds that refers to, whether that 11 includes all ponds or just City ponds. 12 13 Scherer replied that was in reference to ponds within the stormwater system. He noted 14 that those include City owned ponds as well as pond owned by HOAs. 15 16 DesLauriers asked for more information on smart salt. 17 18 Scherer provided details on the smart salt certification program that educates the public 19 works crew on proper salt application. 20 21 DesLauriers commented that the team did a great job cleaning up and replanting in 22 Harriet’s Woods. He also noted the upcoming City-wide cleanup day. 23 24 Cavanaugh thanked Scherer and his staff for the excellent job. 25 26 Reid appreciated the efforts on salt reduction as that salt eventually ends up in a body of 27 water and once it is in the water it cannot be removed. 28 29 Albers also thanked Scherer and his team. 30 31 Albers opened the public hearing. 32 33 No comments. 34 35 Albers closed the public hearing. 36 37 B. Long Lake Water Association Project (7:57 p.m.) 38 Johnson stated that Medina has contributed towards carp removal projects in Long Lake 39 and also partnered with the Long Lake Waters Association and other cities for a study. 40 He stated that the group has received grant funding in the past and would like to 41 continue to partner with projects. He stated that funding is being requested from Medina 42 to complete additional carp removal. 43 44 Finke stated that Medina has been a part of the partnership related to the Long Lake 45 Creek Subwatershed which includes Medina, Long Lake, Orono, Minnehaha Creek 46 Watershed, and Long Lake Waters Association (LLWA). He stated that this partnership 47 was able to obtain two grants to complete a subwatershed assessment and the Wolsfeld 48 Ravine project. He recognized the active participation of the LLWA in terms of advocacy 49 and funding. He noted that LLWA completed carp removal in 2021 and is proposing 50 another carp removal project this spring and summer. He provided a total estimated 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 19, 2022 6 project cost of $24,000. He noted that LLWA has set aside $12,000 of that cost and the 1 City of Long Lake authorized $5,000 towards the project. He noted that Orono has 2 chosen not to participate in funding for the removal. He stated that staff supports 3 partnering on 1/6 of the cost for the project. 4 5 Cassy Ordway, LLWA, stated that LLWA is an all-volunteer nonprofit organization 6 focused on education, incorporating resources, and doing the most they can to improve 7 water quality within the watershed. She appreciated the support of Medina on these 8 projects and opportunities for water quality improvement. She stated that the 9 partnership of Medina and its funding helped to obtain additional funding from BWSR 10 and to initiate and fund smaller in lake projects. She provided details on the carp 11 removal LLWA completed in 2021 in Long Lake. She stated that project removed carp 12 but also identified the movement of the carp. She stated that the goal is to use that data 13 and remove additional carp to have the lake at a better level to restore a healthy 14 ecosystem. She stated that this project would be completed by Carp Solutions in two 15 phases and reviewed those details. She commented that LLWA would like to continue 16 the partnership with Medina and would welcome its funds and support for the project. 17 18 DesLauriers stated that he supports the initiative and asked for insight on why Orono 19 decided not to participate. 20 21 Ordway replied that although Long Lake is in their territory, it seemed the decision of 22 Orono was that in lake projects fall to the Watershed District and the City obligation falls 23 on stormwater management, land use and things outside of the water. She stated that 24 Orono does support the project, but the decision was related to the funding strategy of 25 the City. She stated that LLWA appreciates the support of Medina and Long Lake as 26 well as businesses within Medina, Long Lake and Orono that appreciate the quality of 27 natural resources and also provide support. 28 29 Cavanaugh asked for clarification on the movement of the carp and the impact these 30 carp may have on Wolsfeld. 31 32 Ordway provided additional details on the 2021 project that was completed to remove 33 carp and the movement of the carp that was identified through that project. She noted 34 that as carp move up the creek for spawning, they cannot go past the pond because of 35 the weir and provided additional details on that barrier. 36 37 Cavanaugh commented that it is a great effort and initiative. He stated that the only 38 hesitation he would have would be similar to Orono in that this seems to be a watershed 39 issue. He noted that the primary benefit is outside of Medina, in a lake completely 40 outside of Medina. He asked if it is appropriate for the City to use funds on a project 41 outside of Medina as the carp are not coming into Wolsfeld. 42 43 Ordway stated that this project will also provide data on the size of the carp and the 44 related improvement of water quality. She noted that additional educational benefit will 45 be gained as well as improved water quality. 46 47 Finke recognized that when Medina started looking into carp management, the analysis 48 started more systemically in tracking migration patterns. He stated that the partnership 49 was able to determine that the migration to Medina waters is not happening and that 50 data still provides benefit to Medina and the other entities involved in the partnership. 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 19, 2022 7 1 Reid asked if the money from Medina is needed to move forward on this project. 2 3 Ordway replied that LLWA is in a financial position to complete both phase one and two 4 of the project. She stated that if Medina were to partner, LLWA could look at additional 5 project opportunities in the northern part of the watershed. 6 7 Reid stated that she is hesitant as she does not see direct benefit to Medina. She noted 8 that a report was already provided from Carp Solutions to LICA. 9 10 Johnson stated that the focus on the partnership and noted that in working together the 11 partners can focus on other projects in the watershed. He stated that while the focus of 12 this presentation was on Long Lake, there would be projects in other areas of the 13 watershed that would provide benefit to Medina. 14 15 Albers stated that the Council will assume that Martin has dropped off the call for the 16 remainder of the meeting. He noted that the weir is not a 100 percent barrier to prevent 17 migration. He stated that in high waters, the carp could bypass the weir and get into the 18 waters to the north. He stated that carp are late spawners compared to other fish 19 breeds and typically occurs after snow melt when the waters are warming, perhaps 20 along the timing of large spring rain events which could cause higher than normal water 21 levels. He stated that removing the biomass out of Long Lake would provide benefit as it 22 would reduce the number of fish that travel north to spawn. He believed that the amount 23 of funding requested is acceptable as it will reduce the breeding population as the weir is 24 not an absolute prevention method. 25 26 Cavanaugh asked if any fish were tagged that moved north beyond the barrier. 27 28 Ordway replied that she did not believe so but was not 100 percent certain. 29 30 Albers commented that it would depend when the study was completed, whether it was 31 done premigration or post migration and also would depend upon the water levels at that 32 time. He referenced the migration of the Asian carp up the Mississippi River, noting that 33 those fish were able to get into the river 10 or 15 years ago because of flooding which 34 allowed the fish to travel from their ponds into the rivers. He noted that any high-water 35 event in the right timing can allow the fish to migrate. He believed that the cost of 36 $4,200 is a small cost to assist in preventing the spread of carp. 37 38 Reid stated that she does not have a problem with the contribution, but the carp are not 39 coming to Medina from Long Lake. She stated that the contribution is warranted, and 40 she does support that action. 41 42 Ordway appreciated the partnership of Medina and its interest in understanding carp. 43 She noted that the partnership assists in the overall work in the watershed to improve 44 water quality. 45 46 Reid agreed with those statements. 47 48 Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Reid, to authorize payment of $4,200 or 1/6 of the 49 total cost (whichever is greater) from the Environmental Fund toward the 2022 carp 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 19, 2022 8 removal project as described in the materials submitted by Long Lake Waters 1 Association. 2 3 A roll call vote was performed: 4 5 DesLauriers aye 6 Cavanaugh aye 7 Reid aye 8 Albers aye 9 10 Motion passed unanimously. 11 12 C. Marsh Pointe Final Plat – Public Hearing (8:32 p.m.) 13 Johnson stated that staff anticipates that final review of the plat will occur on May 3rd. 14 He stated that the public hearing for the storm sewer improvement tax district was 15 noticed for this meeting, therefore staff recommends the Council hold the public hearing 16 and table consideration of the ordinance to the May 3rd meeting in order for staff to bring 17 all the items forward at the same time. 18 19 DesLauriers asked why this would be done now instead of waiting for May 3rd. 20 21 Johnson stated that everything was noticed and supposed to be ready to go at this 22 meeting, but staff did not receive all of the information for Final Plat to make that 23 happen. He stated staff would prefer to have all of the actions taken at the same time. 24 25 Finke stated that the notice for the public hearing was noticed and therefore it is 26 appropriate to open the hearing and allow anyone to speak on the topic. He stated that 27 the Council could continue the hearing to the May 3rd meeting if desired, but that would 28 not be necessary and could be closed tonight. He stated that final action on the plat will 29 occur at the May 3rd meeting. 30 31 Anderson also clarified that the public hearing remained on the agenda because it had 32 been noticed for this meeting. He noted that the Council could complete the public 33 hearing at this time or could republish the public hearing for the next meeting which 34 would have additional cost. 35 36 Johnson stated that staff is attempting to avoid having to publish the notice for the public 37 hearing again which is why this was brought forward to this meeting. 38 39 Albers opened the public hearing. 40 41 No comments. 42 43 Albers closed the public hearing. 44 45 Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Albers, to table consideration of the ordinance 46 establishing the Marsh Pointe Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District to the May 3, 2022 47 meeting. 48 49 A roll call vote was performed: 50 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 19, 2022 9 DesLauriers aye 1 Cavanaugh aye 2 Reid aye 3 Albers aye 4 5 Motion passed unanimously. 6 7 D. Arrowhead Drive Contract 8 Johnson stated on February 1, 2022 the Council approved the resolution approving the 9 plans and specifications and authorizing this project to be bid. He stated that bids were 10 received and opened on March 4, 2022. He reported an estimated project cost of 11 $875,500 which included contingency. He noted the petition and waiver agreement with 12 OSI that specifies a contribution of 40 percent of the project cost up to a maximum of 13 $357,710. He stated that OSI has agreed to relocate their driveway to align with 14 Meander Road. 15 16 Stremel stated that five bids were received ranging from $610,000 to $755,000. He 17 referenced the engineer’s estimate of $665,000 and the total project cost estimate of 18 $875,000. He reviewed the different forms of funding that will be used and noted that 19 OSI will be using New Look Contracting for their driveway relocation project as well 20 which may provide opportunity for overlapping cost savings. He provided a summary of 21 the proposed project elements and also reviewed other projects in the surrounding area. 22 23 Albers asked how disruptive this project and the others would be to residents in this 24 area. 25 26 Stremel stated that for this project, they did not plan for a full closure, although there will 27 be lane interruptions having only one lane open during short periods of time. He stated 28 that more information will be known about the schedules of the other projects in the near 29 future and staff will work with Weston Woods residents. He stated that the Mohawk 30 Drive utility projects will have full closures for about two days. 31 32 Scherer stated that staff will contract to ensure dust control and gravel prior to the 33 Arrowhead Drive project beginning. 34 35 Cavanaugh referenced moving the OSI entrance from north to south and asked if staff is 36 comfortable with the amount of stacking that would be available. 37 38 Stremel confirmed that element was part of the review in the study. He stated that 39 stacking can occur into the intersection if it needs to but having dual lanes for left turns 40 will assist with stacking. 41 42 DesLauriers thanked OSI for participating in the realignment and restriping. 43 44 Albers echoed the comment that OSI is a great partner in helping this project become a 45 reality. 46 47 Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Cavanaugh, to adopt the resolution accepting the 48 lowest responsible bid and awarding the contract to New Look Contracting, Inc. for the 49 Arrowhead Drive Turn Lane Expansion Project in the amount of $609,541. 50 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 19, 2022 10 A roll call vote was performed: 1 2 DesLauriers aye 3 Albers aye 4 Cavanaugh aye 5 Reid aye 6 7 Motion passed unanimously. 8 9 IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (8:50 p.m.) 10 Johnson advised of Cleanup Day on April 30th from 8 a.m. to noon at 600 Clydesdale 11 Trail. 12 13 X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (8:51 p.m.) 14 No comments. 15 16 XI. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (8:51 p.m.) 17 Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Reid, to approve the bills, EFT 006303E-006327E 18 for $107,695.10, order check numbers 052736-052791 for $323,272.57, and payroll EFT 19 0511716-0511776 for $118,016.69. 20 21 A roll call vote was performed: 22 23 DesLauriers aye 24 Cavanaugh aye 25 Reid aye 26 Albers aye 27 28 Motion passed unanimously. 29 30 XII. CLOSED SESSION: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED DISCUSSION ON 31 LITIGATION RELATED TO ZONING VIOLATION AT 2402 STATE HIGHWAY 32 55 PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. SEC. 13D.05, Subd. 3(b) 33 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 19, 2022 11 Cavanaugh commented that he will be abstaining from the closed session. 1 2 Albers asked if three members would still be considered a quorum. 3 4 Johnson confirmed that three out of five members is needed for the quorum, so the 5 Council would still have a quorum without Cavanaugh and Martin. 6 7 Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Albers, to adjourn the meeting to closed session at 8 8:54 p.m. for attorney-client privileged discussion on litigation related to zoning violation 9 at 2402 State Highway 55 pursuant to Minn. Stat. Sec. 13D.05, Subd. 3(b). 10 11 A roll call vote was performed: 12 13 DesLauriers aye 14 Reid aye 15 Albers aye 16 17 Motion passed unanimously. 18 19 The meeting returned to open session at 9:34 p.m. 20 21 XIII. ADJOURN 22 Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Reid, to adjourn the meeting at 9:36 p.m. 23 24 A roll call vote was performed: 25 26 DesLauriers aye 27 Albers aye 28 Cavanaugh aye 29 Reid aye 30 31 Motion passed unanimously. 32 33 34 __________________________________ 35 Kathy Martin, Mayor 36 Attest: 37 38 ____________________________________ 39 Scott Johnson, City Administrator 40 Medina City Council Special Meeting Minutes 1 April 19, 2022 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 19, 2022 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in special session on April 19, 2022, at 6:00 p.m. at the Medina City Hall, 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN. I. Call to Order Members present: Martin, Albers, Reid, DesLauriers, Cavanaugh Members absent: Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, Finance Director Erin Barnhart, Public Safety Director Jason Nelson, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, and Planning Director Dusty Finke II. Discuss ARPA Funds Finance Director Erin Barnhart provided a presentation on possible uses for Medina’s allocation of ARPA funds. Staff recommended allocating the funds to the road fund because it would benefit all Medina residents. Council discussed and recommended allocating $150,000 to a future fire facility. Staff was directed to move forward in this direction. III. Electric Vehicle Charging Ordinance Discussion Planning Intern Colette Baumgardner provided a presentation on electric vehicle charging options. Staff discussed possible options for charging stations and regulatory methods. Council reviewed the options and provided feedback on the possible methods. Staff will incorporate the feedback and bring this item to a future Planning Commission meeting. IV. Discuss BWSR Funds for Proposed Wolsfeld Woods Project Planning Director Dusty Finke provided an update to the City Council regarding the grant project. The DNR did not approve the Wolsfeld Woods project and want the area to remain natural with the current erosion issues. Staff has reviewed several possible projects to utilize the grant funds but were not able to find a suitable project. Staff recommended trying to find a project in the area that is shovel ready for the funds. The City Council discussed options with staff. The meeting was recessed at 7:00 p.m. until after the 7:00 p.m. City Council meeting. The meeting was called to order at 9:43 p.m. (Mayor Martin did not return to the meeting). Staff was directed to continue to look for projects in this subwatershed and to delay the decision. Staff could ask for an extension from BWSR if a project is discovered in Medina. Medina City Council Special Meeting Minutes 2 April 19, 2022 V. Adjournment Albers closed the meeting at 9:50 p.m. _________________________ Todd Albers, Acting Mayor Attest: ____________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk This report provides an overview of the City of Medina’s activities, accomplishments, and fiscal responsibility for calendar year 2021. 2021 Annual Report Agenda Item #5A 1 | Page 2021 Annual Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Mayor’s Welcome City Council page 2 City Departments City Administration pages 3-5 Finance Department pages 6-8 Planning Department pages 9-12 Public Works Department pages 13-15 Parks & Trails page 16-17 Police Department pages 18-27 Fire Departments pages 27-30 2021: A Year in Retrospect pages 31-34 Preview of 2021 Goals page 35 Recognizing Our Contributors pages 36 Recognizing Staff and Service Providers pages 37 2 | Page 2021 Annual Report Kathleen Martin,Mayor Term: August 2018-Present Dino DesLauriers, Councilmember Term: August 2018-Present Todd Albers, Councilmember Term: January 2019 -Present Joseph Cavanaugh, Councilmember Term: January 2021- Present Robin Reid, Councilmember Term: January 2021-Present Mayor’s Welcome I am pleased to share this Annual Report, which outlines changes and activities in Medina in 2021 and exhibits the high quality of service provided to our residents and businesses by an extremely capable, committed, and nimble City staff. The City continued to adapt and seamlessly advance city operations and service delivery while navigating the continuous changes in 2021 in the world and in our community. I invite you to turn the pages of this report and hope it brings you great pride to be a resident of Medina. Kathleen Martin, Mayor City Council 2021 City Council Members 2021 City Council Members 3 | Page 2021 Annual Report City Administration It is an honor and privilege to provide the 2021 Annual Report for Medina. The theme for this year’s Annual Report, “New Transitions”, is a fitting description of the policy steps taken by the City Council and implemented by staff in 2021. Actions were taken to study and improve our parks, ordinances were updated to address issues and implement our comprehensive plan, and the City continued to push for cost effective transportation upgrades. Our team has and will continue to concentrate on providing high quality services to Medina residents in the most cost- effective manner possible. The City of Medina looks forward to a productive and prosperous 2022. As the City Administrator, I welcome your visits and calls. You can reach me at scott.johnson@medinamn.gov or (763) 473- 4643. Scott Johnson, City Administrator PRIMARY SERVICES The Administration Department oversees the daily operations and administration of the City and works closely with the City Council to implement Council policies and directives. The services provided by the Administration Department include City elections, recycling, records retention (city code, ordinances, resolutions, meeting minutes, contracts, etc.), licensing (liquor, tobacco, gambling, solicitors, etc.), public relations, human resources, and IT/communications. STAFFING The Administration Department consists of three staff members: a full-time City Administrator (Scott Johnson), a full-time Assistant City Administrator-City Clerk (Jodi Gallup in 2021), and a part-time Administrative Assistant (Nichole Vogel). In 2022, Caitlyn Walker joined the team as the new City Clerk/Assistant to the City Administrator. The City contracts for legal counsel with Kennedy & Graven. HIGHLIGHTS and ACTIVITIES • Business: The Medina Economic Development Authority held its two annual meetings. Spring and fall business tours were held with Medina Businesses. The City sent out regular communications on various grant opportunities for businesses struggling due to COVID-19 shutdowns and restrictions. • Licenses & Permits: COVID-19 restrictions continued to create hardship for local bars and restaurants. In April, the City Council approved a liquor license fee waiver for restaurants and bars to help reduce their financial burdens. In November, the City Council approved a new liquor license to AGH Ventures LLC for its new local business, X-Golf. 4 | Page 2021 Annual Report • Information Technology: Information Technology continued to play an important role in city operations during the pandemic. The City Council continued virtual meetings from 2020 to June 2021. The Council returned to in-person meetings in July, and then transitioned back to virtual meetings in September in response to growing COVID-19 cases. The City continued to utilize cloud-based systems for city documents. The City’s permanent records are stored in Laserfiche’s cloud application and are always accessible to the public. The City approved a new technology services agreement with Solution Builders in November. • Human Resources: The City recognized six employees for milestone years of service in 2021. Staff continued to use an online training program to fulfill annual safety training requirements. Human Resources stayed busy throughout the year with staff changes including internal promotions/job changes, resignations, recruitment processes, and onboarding new employees. In January, Nichole Jacobson transitioned from the part-time administrative assistant for the Administration and Finance departments to the part-time administrative assistant for the Police Department. Nichole Vogel was hired as the part-time administrative assistant for the Administration and Finance departments. Officer John Vinck began employment with the Police Department in April. Justin Cook transitioned from a Reserve Officer to a Community Service Officer in May. Nicholas Zumbusch began employment as a Public Works Maintenance Technician in March and later resigned in July. Assistant City Administrator Jodi Gallup resigned in November. The City successfully negotiated a one-year Union Labor Agreement with Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. • Garbage, Recycling & Organics: Staff continued to promote organics recycling in 2021 and offered a $20 credit on residents’ garbage bills for new organics subscribers and referrals, which was funded through an organics grant from Hennepin County. Staff educates and encourages recycling and organics recycling at Clean-up Day and through communications in the Medina Message. • Public Relations: The City continues to utilize social media to promote public events and services to residents. Assistant City Administrator Jodi Gallup contributed a monthly column in a community publication called LocalTies. The column provided residents a more personal connection to the City of Medina and the services its staff provides. The Medina Message newsletter educates residents on current news and events, City Council actions, public meeting notices, and other pertinent information. • Transportation: The city completed planning and permitting for an extension of Chippewa Road between Arrowhead Drive and Mohawk Drive. Construction of the roadway began in the fall of 2021 as part of the Weston Woods of Medina development and is anticipated to continue through 2022 and be completed in the summer of 2023. 5 | Page 2021 Annual Report Recycling & Organics Reporting Recycling 660.42 tons collected (annually) 89% weekly set-out rate Organics 54.99 tons collected (annually) 561 out of 2,231 households subscribe 25% participation rate FACTS and FIGURES 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Temporary On-Sale Consumption & Display On-Sale 2 AM On-Sale Wine 3.2 On Sale On-Sale On-Sale Sunday Off-Sale Liquor Licenses Types 2021 0 2 4 6 8 10 Raffle Transient Merchant Perpetual Gambling Tobacco Peddler/Solicitor Other Licenses & Permits Administration Facts Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees: 24 Total Hours Worked by All Employees: 57,891 Average Staff Longevity: 11.2 years Number of First Reports of Injury: 3 City Council 2021 Actions Ordinances Adopted: 14 Resolutions Approved: 88 Local Board of Appeal Applications Reviewed: 7 Hours Spent in Council Session: 40.5 6 | Page 2021 Annual Report Finance Department In 2021, the City financed two mill and overlay road projects from the road fund and special assessments. Reimbursement was received from the State of Minnesota for the completion of the Arrowhead Railroad Quiet Zone project. Medina was awarded $710,000 of the American Rescue Plan Act funds; the first half was received in 2021 and the second half will be received in 2022. These federal funds are part of a stimulus bill to aid public health and economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. It is anticipated that fund use will be determined in 2022 but can be used on eligible expenses through 2024. The City continues to maintain adequate fund balances for general City operations. The City’s General Fund follows City policy to keep in reserve a minimum of five months of the next year’s budgeted expenditures from the General Fund. In the event of serious economic constraints on the community, the City will be able to utilize these reserves for emergency purposes as designed. City water funds are also sound for present and future needs. Utility Fund balances are primarily comprised of user fees from monthly water bills, which are applied to costs of daily operations and infrastructure replacement. Having appropriate fund balances can alleviate the need to issue bonds for projects. Erin Barnhart, Finance Director PRIMARY SERVICES The Finance Department facilitates other City departments making reliable management decisions and achieving their goals and objectives while maintaining the integrity of the City’s financial management system. Specifically, the department is responsible for: • Accounting • Financial Management • Assessing • Payroll • Utility Billing The Finance Department also produces the following documents, with the assistance of other City departments: the comprehensive budget, annual audited financial statements, the five-year capital improvement program (CIP), and the financial management plan. STAFFING The Finance Department consists of three positions: Finance Director (Erin Barnhart), Accountant (Jennifer Altendorf) and part-time Administrative Assistant (Nichole Vogel) who is shared with Administration. • Purchasing • Investments • Debt Service & Bond Management • Management of City Assets • Election Assistance 7 | Page 2021 Annual Report HIGHLIGHTS and ACTIVITIES In addition to providing the day-to-day financial services, the department also assisted in operations of the Hamel Community Building. The 2020 water and sewer rate analysis supported a 1% increase to water and sewer rates for 2021 to cover increased operating expenses and anticipated future capital expenses. This allows the water utility and sewer utility funds to remain self-contained to pay for on-going operational expenses and future capital projects. The water utility fund provides for the distribution of potable water to customers, which includes the operation of three water systems, administration costs and utility billing. The sewer utility fund covers fees to the Metropolitan Council for sewage treatment, customer service, utility billing, maintenance, and monitoring of the system. In 2021, permits for 50 new single-family homes and 33 townhomes were issued. Together with the total commercial construction activity, an estimated $67,110,741 of value will be added to the tax base in 2023. Where Do My Property Taxes Go? Share 2020 in Cents Tax Rate County $0.40 38.079% Schools $0.28 26.919% City $0.24 22.491% Other $0.08 7.954% $1.00 95.444% * School District #284 Wayzata ** Other includes various metro taxing districts, and other special taxing districts (excluding watershed) County $0.40 Schools $0.28 City $0.24 Other $0.08 8 | Page 2021 Annual Report FACTS and FIGURES General Administration 20% Police & Emergency Management 37% Planning & Zoning 4% Parks & Recreation 5% Public Works 15% Building Inspection 6% Fire 8% Economic Housing 1% Transfers 4% General Fund Expenditures $5,082,380 Property Tax Levy, 73% Other Taxes, 1% Licenses and Permits, 8% Intergovernmental, 6% Charges for Services, 3% Fines and Forfeitures, 2% Miscellaneous , 3% Transfers In, 4% General Fund Revenue $5,082,380 City Tax Levy $4,392,771 in 2020 $4,622,859 in 2021 Utility Billing 3,306 customers 1,917 billed monthly 1,510 use electronic payment services City Bond Rating Aa1 9 | Page 2021 Annual Report Planning/Zoning & Building Department Building permit activity in Medina remained steady in 2021 despite construction cost increases and supply issues which affected building activity through the year. New home construction activity increased, with permits issued for a total of 83 new homes. New construction included 50 single- family homes and 33 townhomes. Several smaller residential projects were approved in 2021 and a retail building was proposed for the southeast corner of Highway 55 and County Road 116. Plans for construction of the BAPS Mandir were also approved. Construction of these projects is anticipated to proceed in 2022. Through the first half of 2021, the City considered a proposed master plan for the Diamond Lake Regional Trail. Three Rivers Park District was evaluating a regional trail in western Hennepin County, extending north-south from Wayzata to Rogers. Several potential routes were discussed through Medina and discussion occurred at several open houses and public meetings. Following substantial public engagement and discussion, the City Council approved a conceptual route from the northern boundary of the City to Baker Park. Planning staff submitted a grant request and the City was awarded $25,000 from Hennepin County to hire economic development experts to enhance improvements and development in the Uptown Hamel area. This work is scheduled for 2022. The City progressed with planning and design for significant street projects. The City completed the permitting process for construction of Chippewa Road between Arrowhead Drive and Mohawk Drive. Construction is anticipated during 2022 in connection with construction of the Weston Woods of Medina. During the summer of 2021, Medina was awarded $700,000 in Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) funding from the Minnesota Department of Transportation toward improvements to Hackamore Road. Medina and Corcoran are working together on the street improvements because Hackamore runs along the common boundary of the two communities. The cities will continue to coordinate with the City of Plymouth, Hennepin County, and developers of new construction projects along the corridor to complete the improvements. Please reach out to Deb, Brenda, and me with respect to building permits, zoning, or any general inquiries pertaining to the land or development in Medina. We are here to help! Dusty Finke, Planning Director 10 | Page 2021 Annual Report PRIMARY SERVICES The Planning and Zoning Department administers the City’s Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. This includes coordinating the policy directives of the Planning Commission and the City Council, reviewing development and land use applications for compliance with relevant City regulations and code enforcement activities. The Department coordinates the building permit process and assists contractors and homeowners. The Department also administers the Wetland Conservation Act and floodplain regulations and assists other departments with geographical information system (GIS) mapping and analysis. STAFFING The Planning and Zoning Department consists of three full-time staff members: Associate Planner Deb Dion, Planning Assistant Brenda Ruth, and Planning Director Dusty Finke. Lisa DeMars served as the Administrative Assistant for both Planning and Public Works through 2021. Lisa has transitioned to the full-time Public Works Assistant and Brenda was hired in early 2022. The department also often works with an intern. The City contracts for building inspection/plan review services with Metro West Inspection Services and supplemental planning consulting services with Northwest Associated Consultants. Staff also works closely with the consultant City Engineer and City Attorney and staff from other departments and agencies. HIGHLIGHTS and ACTIVITIES • Building Permit Activity (summary can be found on following page) o 50 new single-family homes and 33 new townhomes permitted o Estimated $67,110,741 of market value added to the City (combined residential and commercial construction) o 940 building permits issued • Land Use Activity (summary can be found on following page) o Commercial projects – 3962 Pinto Drive retail project, BAPS Mandir o Residential developments – Weston Woods, Baker Park Townhomes, Holy Name Lake Estates, Ditterswind, Prairie Creek o Nine smaller-scale projects (variances, conditional use permits, lot rearrangements, etc.) 11 | Page 2021 Annual Report • Diamond Lake Regional Trail Master Plan o Substantial public engagement process including several open houses and public meetings o City Council approved a conceptual route through Medina on June 15, 2021 • Uptown Hamel Grant Funding o $25,000 grant awarded from Hennepin County Community Works o Action Plan anticipated to be completed in 2022 • Planned Roadway Improvements o Chippewa Road (Arrowhead Drive to Mohawk Drive) – permitted and designed in 2021; construction anticipated in 2022 o Arrowhead Drive/Highway 55 – intersection improvements designed in 2021; construction anticipated in 2022 o Hackamore Road (between County Road 101 and County Road 116) - $700,000 LRIP funding secured from State of Minnesota • Ordinance Amendments – updated regulations related to: o Stormwater management o Signs and Dynamic Displays o Swimming Pools – setback from utility lines 12 | Page 2021 Annual Report FACTS and FIGURES Building Permit Activity (2017-2021): 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 # New Single Family 60 56 43 37 50 Valuation $29,700,510 $31,235,936 $23,391,809 $24,025,330 $34,934,913 # New Townhomes 0 0 0 33 Valuation $0 $0 $0 $7,120,485 # New Multi-family 1 # units 82 Valuation $12,436,239 # New Commercial 2 0 2 3 4 Valuation $3,180,250 $0 $1,798,280 $4,656,784 $5,358,000 # Other Valued Residential 134 110 144 168 179 Valuation $5,197,373 $5,460,604 $9,388,480 $8,067,749 $12,204,453 # Other Valued Commercial 65 106 53 196 156 Valuation $9,383,763 $9,462,523 $3,971,008 $33,122,995 $7,492,890 General Permits 344 341 796 701 518 Total Permits 861 835 1244 1320 940 Total Valuation $47,461,896 $46,159,063 $50,985,816 $69,872,858 $67,110,741 Land Use Application History (2016-2021): 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Variances 2 3 0 2 1 1 Conditional Use Permits 1 8 1 3 5 3 Preliminary Plats 3 5 1 2 6 3 Final Plats 6 4 4 2 4 6 Lot Divisions, Rearrangements 2 3 4 3 1 1 Site Plans 4 2 2 2 2 4 Planned Unit Developments 2 1 1 1 0 2 Comp Plan Amendments 0 3 1 0 2 1 Zoning Amendment 3 4 1 3 4 0 Ordinances 3 9 7 3 6 4 Vacations 3 0 0 3 3 0 Extensions to file plats 4 2 3 1 0 2 Interim Use Permit 0 1 0 0 1 0 Annexations 1 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 0 0 0 0 1 0 Totals 34 45 25 25 36 27 13 | Page 2021 Annual Report Public Works Department The drought, supply shortages, and continued subcontracted service staffing issues (related to the pandemic) required us to get creative to stay on track with projects in 2021. Public Works navigated staffing challenges of our own for much of the year yet successfully completed the MS4 permit renewal, updated the capital improvement plan, oversaw completion of the Loram trail connection, began phase I of the Hunter Park renovation, and managed a number of reforestation projects. Residents continued to take refuge within the parks and trail systems, reminding us of the importance of these amenities. Our annual cleanup day event took place “between” COVID-19 variants and was a huge success – it was fantastic to connect with residents in person once again. Steve Scherer, Public Works Director PRIMARY SERVICES The Public Works Department oversees the daily operations of sewer and water utilities, parks/trails, road maintenance/repairs, the compost/brush site and maintenance for all City properties, and all city buildings, including the community center, field house, city hall, etc. Public Works performs erosion control inspections, coordinates safety training (OSHA) for City Staff, and manages the grounds at the German Liberal Cemetery. Whether it be clearing debris from a right of way or responding to a watermain break under a state highway, the Public Works Team prioritizes and responds quickly to residents who reach out for help. In addition, Public Works plans long term capital improvement projects and collaborates with the Planning Department to identify and budget for the infrastructure needs of our growing City. 14 | Page 2021 Annual Report STAFFING The Public Works Department consists of one seasonal and seven full‐time staff members: Public Works Director, (Steve Scherer), Foreman (Derek Reinking), Field Inspector (Jack Gleason), Water & Sewer Operator (Greg Leuer), two Maintenance Technicians (Joe Ende, and [open position]), Seasonal Maintenance Technician (Jeff Bursch), and Administrative Assistant (Lisa DeMars). The vacant Maintenance Technician position was filled in March of 2022. The Department works with WSB and Hakanson Anderson for engineering guidance. HIGHLIGHTS and ACTIVITIES Road Planning, Paving, and Maintenance Projects • Cleared brush and installed a paved shoulder on Medina Road from Brockton Lane to Hunter Drive. • Completed curbing work at Lakeshore Drive. • Completed seeding on Brockton Lane. • Paved Highcrest Drive and Oak Circle. • Completed the reclamation and overlay of Shire Drive on the 1200 ft. west section, and a mill and overlay on the 450 ft. east section, as well as replaced curbing. • Crack sealed and seal coated Pioneer Trail from Hamel Road to Hwy 55. • Crack sealed Hunter Drive between Medina Road and Hamel Road. • Collaborated with the Planning Department and contractors to extend Chippewa Road from Arrowhead to Mohawk as part of the Weston Woods development. • Teamed with Corcoran, Hennepin County, Plymouth, and the Planning Department to finalize design for the Hackamore Road project. Water and Sewer • Completed the sewer lining project. • Oversaw the installation of control software upgrade at the water treatment plant. • Oversaw water and sewer installation of Meadowview Commons and Pulte Reserve. • Developed a risk and resilience assessment in preparation of a written procedure. Maintained Infrastructure Roads & Trails: 61.1 Miles of Street 6.4 Miles of Sidewalk 12.2 Miles of On & Off Road Trails 750 Street Signs 180 Street Lights 35 Roadside Ditch Miles (mowed) 182 Culverts Sewer: 44.15 Sanitary Sewer Miles 11 Sewer Lift Stations 1,216 Sewer Manholes Water: 588 Hydrants 51.17 Water Main Miles 11 Water Wells 1 Water Treatment Plant Water Pumped/Treated (gallons): 182,443,000 – Hamel System 13,058,900 – Independence Beach 4,957,600 – Medina Morningside 15 | Page 2021 Annual Report Stormwater • Finalized renewal of the 2020 – 2025 MS4 permit. • Cleaned seventeen sump catch basins. • Performed 39 construction site inspections for erosion control, which included 28 violation reports. Other Public Works Activities • Hired, then accepted resignation of maintenance technician. • Hired a seasonal maintenance technician. • Completed all OSHA mandated training courses. • Completed MPCA Smart Salting for Roads certification. • Completed First Aid/AED/CPR certification. • Finalized security gate operation plan for brush/compost site. On-Call Policy: The Public Works Department’s 24/7 on-call policy requires a scheduled public works employee to respond within 45 minutes. There were 77.5 call- out hours worked in 2021. This does not include the hours spent on snow removal and ice treatment. 16 | Page 2021 Annual Report Parks and Trails The Public Works Department and the Park Commission had a productive year. Public Works staff spent approximately 1,803 hours on our parks in 2021. The following projects, policies, and improvements were completed in 2021: • Entered into baseball field rental and maintenance agreements with the Hamel Athletic Club and Orono Baseball. • Updated the Park & Trail Asset Inventory throughout the year. • Paved parking area at the Medina Morningside playground. • Finalized Diamond Lake Regional Trail Master Plan. • Accepted donations from Hamel Athletic Club and grant funding from the Hennepin County Youth Sports Facility Program for ball field lighting on the Paul Fortin field at Hamel Legion Park. • Made recommendations on 2022-2026 Capital Improvement Plan. • Attended Ball Field Lighting Grand Opening in August featuring 13-year-old Hamel teams. • Removed diseased trees at The Enclave’s Hariot’s Woods, planted 350 trees as part of the reforestation project. • Installed a solar light on top of the snow hill at Legion Park. • Removed the fencing and backstop, completed excavation and storm drainage of the ballfield at Hunter Lions Park. • Completed the Loram Trail (south of Hwy 55 connection). Parks and Nature Areas 181 acres maintained in 14 locations Pavilions & Picnic Areas – 10 Baseball & Softball Fields – 10 Basketball Courts or Hoops – 5 Tennis Courts – 4 Ice Skating Rinks – 3 Volleyball Courts – 3 Open Playfields – 4 Boat Launch – 1 Fishing Pier – 2 Field House – 1 Warming House – 1 Soccer Fields – 5 Park Dedication Fee Revenue Generated from New Development 2016: $72,893.02 2017: $40,854.82 2018: $114,918.34 2019: $8,854.19 2020: $42,888.00 2021: $76,477.00 17 | Page 2021 Annual Report • Completed maintenance at the Hamel Community Building including new ceiling fans, removal of a drinking fountain, furnace repairs, door repairs, freezer repairs, and exterior outlet repairs prior to Celebration Day. • Hired a landscape design consultant and held a virtual public engagement period to establish a master plan for Lakeshore Park renovations. • Completed trail paving at Hamel Legion Park. • Replaced garbage bin enclosure at Lakeshore Park. The Park Commission reviewed the following land use applications and made recommendations on policies, park dedication, parks, and trails related to the following: • James and Melissa Korin – Pioneer Trail Preserve – 2325 Pioneer Trail – Park Dedication Review. • Diamond Lake Regional Trail Master Plan. • Medina Townhome Development LLC – 1432 County Road 29 – Planned Unit Development – Park & Trail Review. • Marsh Pointe Preserve – Preliminary Plat – 4250-4292 Arrowhead Drive – Park Dedication Review. • SH Ventures, Inc. – PID 05-118-23-22-0005 – Lifestyle Auto Condos – PUD Concept Plan – Park Dedication Review. 18 | Page 2021 Annual Report Police Department Message from the Public Safety Director On behalf of all the members of the Police Department it is an honor to present you with the Departmental 2021 Annual Report. It is an essential goal of ours to create a community-based relationship with the public we serve, while doing everything in our power to be consistent and transparent in all we do. Our annual report is one of the best ways to show the community our department, its amazing officers and staff, the services that we provide, and the information and data that has been gathered. While 2020 had been a year of turmoil, with both a worldwide pandemic and unprecedented civil unrest, the hope was that 2021 would be a year of understanding, reform, and progress. Little did we know the pandemic would hang on as long as it has, and also that the unfortunate death of Daunte Wright in Brooklyn Center would occur during a traffic stop. 2021 was a year of awakening and perseverance by many members of our brave Medina Police Department. Again, when the masses were told to stay home, the men and women of our Medina Police Department reported to work each and every day. Your officers responded for those in harm’s way, putting their own health and wellbeing second in order to protect and serve. I would like to thank the amazing community of Medina for its support of all the members of our Police Department through these times. This past year also was the year of audits for the Police Department. We completed audits conducted by the Minnesota Board of Police Officer Standards (POST), which reviews all our policy and procedure manuals, along with officer training and compliance every five years. The Bureau of Criminal Apprehension triannual audit of our in-house files and records, the Information Technology Audit, and the Juvenile Justice Audit conducted by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety were all completed in 2021. I am happy to say that we passed all audits with no issues to note. In April 2021, we added an 11th officer to the Police Department. Officer John Vinck had previously been with the Police Department for 10 years before leaving in 2015 to join the Minneapolis Police Department. Officer Vinck was a great addition back to our team and we and the community are lucky to have him back. We also hired Community Service Officer (CSO) Justin Cook to fill the vacancy that was left when CSO Patrick Johnson left for a police officer job outstate. In October 2021, we signed a contract with Lexipol, which is America’s leading source of state- specific policy and training that will help reduce risk, lower potential litigation costs, and improve personnel safety. All our policies and procedures are put out to the officers with daily training bulletins (DTBs). Policies are constantly being reviewed by Lexipol and its team of attorneys to ensure compliance with federal and state court cases and regulation. 19 | Page 2021 Annual Report Back in 1829, Sir Robert Peel, who is regarded by many as the father of modern policing, developed what is known as the Nine Principles of Law Enforcement to guide law enforcement officers. Peel’s second principle states, “The ability of police to perform their duties is dependent upon public approval of police existence, actions, behavior and the ability of the police to secure and maintain public respect.” Almost 200 years later this still holds true. The ability to fight crime and do our jobs depends on the public’s perception of the legitimacy of officers’ actions. As you all know, there are many now demanding police reforms to enhance police accountability and transparency. With that thought in mind, I firmly believe that adding the body camera solution, in addition to our squad and gun cameras, was a giant step toward accountability and transparency. With that philosophy, I am happy to report that our officers were outfitted in December 2021 with body cameras. This was a long and tedious project, but I believe that we did our due diligence and picked the right vendor. Now all sworn officers have been issued body cameras and our police squad cameras have all been updated so that they work in synchronization with each other. I personally would like to thank everyone for the continued support of your Police Department. Sincerely, Jason E. Nelson, Director of Public Safety MISSION STATEMENT Our mission of the Medina Police Department is to ensure the safety of the citizens of Medina through the enforcement of the laws of the United States of America, the State of Minnesota, and the ordinances of Medina. Further, it is our mission to treat all people with the utmost respect and dignity in every situation. We will perform our duties in a professional and ethical manner, which will bring pride in the service we provide. PATROL HIGHLIGHTS Pandemic The year 2021 continued with the ongoing battle with the pandemic and the varying COVID-19 strains that were identified throughout the year. Just when we thought things were getting better, the cases began surging once again. While many businesses continued to allow working from home, the Medina Patrol Officers continued with their duties out on the front lines each and every day responding to calls for service. 20 | Page 2021 Annual Report Traffic Enforcement In 2021, officers from the Medina Police Department issued 667 citations and 1,389 warnings for various traffic offenses. Some of the other major calls our patrol officers also responded to include: Extreme speed continued to be an issue on the roadways and Medina Officers have been busy trying to keep the roadways safe for the rest of the public who choose to obey traffic laws. • On 03/13/2021 an Officer stopped a vehicle for driving 95 mph in a 55 mph zone on Highway 55. The driver was found to be intoxicated and arrested for DWI. • On 03/20/2021 an Officer stopped a vehicle for driving 80 mph in a 55 mph zone on Highway 55. The driver was found to be intoxicated and arrested for DWI. 15 79 30 182 101 87 87 39 74437 142 123 235 Other Major Calls Personal Injury Accidents Property Damage Accidents Property Damage Accidents-Deer Suspicious Activity Business Alarms CO2 Alarms Residential Alarms Fire Alarms 911 Hang-Ups Assist Other Agencies Traffic Complaints 21 | Page 2021 Annual Report • On 03/26/2021 an Officer observed a vehicle driving at an extremely high rate of speed. Radar showed the vehicle driving 126 mph in a 55 mph zone. The driver was stopped and cited for speed. • On 05/26/2021 an Officer located a vehicle driving 96 mph in a 55 mph zone on County Road 19. The driver attempted to evade the Officer but was eventually located and arrested for fleeing. • On 05/28/2021 an Officer located a vehicle driving 103 mph in a 55 mph zone on County Road 24. The driver was stopped and admitted to “being stupid” and was cited for extreme speed. • On 06/12/2021 an Officer stopped two vehicles for racing on Highway 55. One vehicle was recorded at 84 mph and the other at 106 mph in the 55 mph zone. Both drivers were stopped and cited for speed. • On 09/25/2021 an Officer stopped a vehicle for driving 78 mph in a posted 40 mph zone. The driver was stopped and cited. • On 10/09/2021 an Officer stopped a motorcycle for driving 89 mph in a posted 55 mph zone on Highway 55. The driver was cited for speed. Unpredictable and Dangerous Job On March 5th, 2021, an Officer conducted a traffic stop on a vehicle for equipment violations in the area of Medina Road and Tamarack Drive. While speaking with the driver regarding the reason for the stop, the driver became uncooperative and attempted to exit the vehicle by opening the driver’s door. The Officer prevented him from opening the door by holding the door shut. The driver then crawled across the front seats and exited out the passenger door and began to flee on foot. The Officer attempted to stop the suspect from fleeing and a brief struggle ensued before the suspect took a swing at the Officer and was able to continue to flee on foot. The Officer gave chase through a secluded wooded area, trudging through deep snow in the process. Multiple other agencies responded to assist, and a perimeter was established. The suspect was eventually apprehended and faces multiple charges from the incident. The Officer was transported to the hospital for evaluation after the physical altercation. An incident like this is a reminder to our officers on how a simple traffic stop can change in an instant to an unpredictable altercation. It is also a reminder to our officers that they can’t become complacent and that no traffic stop can ever be considered “routine.” Rise in Crime 2021 unfortunately continued to see a rise in crime in the metro area, which also reached the City of Medina. The Medina Police Department saw an increase in the theft of motor vehicles in 2021. The west metro has been hit hard along with other suburban cities with theft from automobiles and auto 22 | Page 2021 Annual Report theft. Recently there has been a trend for suspects to enter unlocked vehicles in the driveway and use the garage door openers to open the overhead garage doors to gain access to vehicles in the garage and even the house itself. We also saw a large increase in theft-related crimes. A good majority of them we believed to be COVID related as several involved identity theft in regard to applying for unemployment benefits. On July 4th, 2021, an Officer took a theft from auto report and a car theft report in the City of Loretto. Unlocked vehicles were ransacked, and one vehicle was stolen that had been left unlocked and the key fob left in the glove compartment. The vehicle was later recovered in the City of Jordan. The suspects are believed to be part of a somewhat organized group that targets suburban neighborhoods to steal from unlocked vehicles. On November 5th, 2021, an Officer responded to take a vehicle theft report from the 4200 block of Wild Meadows Drive. The Officer learned that early morning someone used a garage door opener from a vehicle in the driveway to gain access to the garage and a 2021 Jaguar was stolen from inside the garage. The vehicle eventually was able to be tracked via onboard equipment and was later reported to be in the New Hope area. New Hope Police Officers located the vehicle unoccupied in a church parking lot. The vehicle was recovered and towed back to the Medina Police Department for processing. Pursuits The Medina Police Department has seen first-hand a dramatic increase in people fleeing from officers who attempt to make traffic stops. Our agency is not alone in this statistic. Over the past two years the number of drivers that flee from police has increased at an alarming rate. In 2021, the Medina Police Department was involved in 11 pursuits as either the primary or assisting agency. While our department policy currently does allow pursuits, our officers are trained to constantly evaluate the conditions and to terminate pursuits when the safety of the public outweighs the need to apprehend the driver. The number of pursuits our department has been involved in is alarming compared to the number of pursuits from previous years: • 2021 – 11 • 2020 – 9 • 2019 – 6 • 2018 – 4 • 2017 – 1 • 2016 – 2 • 2015 – 3 • 2014 – 3 23 | Page 2021 Annual Report Life Saving Effort In September 2020 the Medina Police Department, along with Loretto Fire Department, were dispatched to a medical, it was reported that a small child was not breathing after a fall. Upon arrival of fire and police personnel they located a parent attempting to perform CPR on the child. Police and Fire took over CPR and after several and after several minutes, the child began to breath on its own. The child was transported to Children’s Hospital and a few days later was discharged from the hospital and made a full recovery. Calls like this can take an emotional toll on First Responders and everyone involved. Witnessing CPR being performed on a small child was probably one of the toughest calls I have personally been on in my career. Luckily, this case had a happy ending with the child being released from the hospital within days of the incident. Other notable calls for 2021: On April 8th, 2021, at 0621 hours, an Officer was dispatched to a business alarm at Highline Warren, 4635 Willow Drive. The Officer began checking the doors to the business and found the front door unsecure and a trash can loaded with computer equipment just inside the door. Soon after the Officer observed a vehicle drive through the grass from the north side of the business and speed south on Willow Drive. By the time the Officer got back to his squad car he was unable to locate the vehicle. Forced entry was found on the west side of the building. The suspect appeared to be targeting computers and computer monitors. Two computers were stolen, two were damaged, and a drone was also stolen from the business. The investigation is ongoing. On April 24th, 2021, at approximately 2240 hours, an Officer stopped a pickup pulling a trailer with no running lights on the trailer. The Officer became suspicious when the driver said he purchased the trailer on Craigslist earlier in the day for $600 even though the trailer was probably worth between $5000-$6000. The trailer had no license plate displayed but the Officers were able to run the VIN and contact the registered owner who said the trailer should be at a jobsite in Greenfield and that the trailer must have been stolen. The driver was arrested for possession of the stolen trailer. The female passenger was found to be in possession of methamphetamine and was also arrested. The passenger reported that they were staying at Baker Park Campground. The Officers later checked the campground and found a 25-foot travel trailer at their camp site with no registration. The VIN was run on that trailer and the Officers were able to make contact with the registered owner who lives in Wisconsin. That person told Officers he had recently traded the travel trailer in to Camping World in Lakeville. The Officers were able to make contact with Camping World come Monday morning who confirmed the trailer was traded in the previous week and should still be on their lot. Search warrants were conducted on the campsite and truck that was towing the stolen trailer. Narcotics, a large amount of suspected stolen equipment, and a loaded handgun were recovered. This is a good example of how a simple equipment violation traffic stop 24 | Page 2021 Annual Report can lead to numerous felony level charges. The victim who had his construction trailer stolen was able to recover his trailer, equipment, and tools. On September 2nd, 2021, officers heard the Plymouth Police Department had attempted to stop a vehicle that was reported to have swerved all over the road and the vehicle fled westbound on Highway 55 from County Road 9. A Medina Officer located the vehicle westbound on Highway 55 and turning southbound on Willow Drive. The Officer observed the vehicle swerving all over the road and driving on the wrong side of the road at times. The Officer attempted to force the vehicle off the road. The vehicle went into the ditch, but the driver attempted to flee. The suspect eventually backed into the squad car and was able to get back onto the roadway. A pursuit was initiated, and the suspect vehicle lost control making a turn and went off the roadway becoming disabled. The driver was found extremely impaired and needed assistance walking after being taken out of the car. The driver claimed to have COVID and asthma and was transported to the hospital. The driver faces multiple charges. On December 9th, 2021, officers responded to a report of a house on fire in the 2800 block of Trappers Trail. When the first officer arrived on scene, he found heavy smoke coming from the residence and an active fire on the east side of the home. Hamel Fire Department along with several other agencies for mutual aid responded to put out the fire. The home was vacant at the time of the fire and sustained heavy fire and smoke damage. Note of Thanks Our patrol officers often work side by side with the members of the four volunteer fire departments that provide services for the residents of Medina. And while fire scenes are typically handled exclusively by the fire departments, many other calls such as medical calls, vehicle accidents, and missing persons, we find ourselves working together. These volunteers drop what they are doing when they receive the page to respond, often interrupting time with their families. They also volunteer time to assist with our community events such as Night to Unite, Medina Celebration Day, and Loretto Funfest. I can speak for all our officers, and probably the entire community, when I say their service is greatly appreciated. A special thanks to the members of the Hamel, Long Lake, Loretto, and Maple Plain Fire Departments for their commitment to protect life and property in the City of Medina. Kevin Boecker, Patrol Sergeant INVESTIGATIONS HIGHLIGHTS In 2021, there were 157 cases assigned to Investigations. The cases consisted of numerous property crime, physical assaults, financial crimes, sexual assaults, child and adult abuse cases. Several of these cases were sent to the Hennepin County Attorney’s office and City Attorney’s office for criminal prosecution. In addition to criminal investigations, I also conducted 62 “permit to acquire” 25 | Page 2021 Annual Report background checks and approximately 15 background checks for solicitor permits, city employment and liquor license applications. I also completed compliance checks for all the liquor and tobacco establishments in the cities of Medina and Loretto. Case Highlights In July 2021, a juvenile victim came forward and reported that the juvenile had been sexually assaulted by a roommate a few years prior. During the interview, the juvenile victim told investigators that the suspect also took pictures of the juvenile naked. I was able to locate a current address for the suspect in a neighboring county. With the assistance from the local police department, I eventually executed a search warrant at the suspect’s residence. While executing the search warrant, I recovered numerous hard drives, computers, cell phones, and a camera that was described by the juvenile victim. The devices later were processed at a facility in Minneapolis that specializes in forensically searching electronic devices. There were thousands of images and videos of suspected child pornography on the device. In reviewing the videos, I located approximately 30 videos that were associated with two victims from Medina. The suspect has been charged in two separate counties related to this incident and currently is in custody awaiting trial. Over the summer, there were numerous reported thefts from motor vehicles at the Medina Golf and Country Club. The thefts occurred primarily on the weekends and involved two suspects. The suspects would steal wallets and purses from unlocked motor vehicles and then use the stolen credit cards to purchase Visa Gift cards at Target stores in Medina and Plymouth. The two suspects were also involved in similar thefts at golf and country clubs in the metro area. The main suspect involved has been charged with numerous felonies in Hennepin County. Joshua McKinley, Investigator PRIMARY SERVICES The Police Department provides law enforcement and emergency response service to the citizens of Medina and Loretto, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The Medina Police Department works to ensure the safety of the citizens of Medina. Further, it is our mission to treat all people with the utmost respect and dignity in every situation. The Police Department also provides a variety of crime prevention and safety programs for citizens and businesses in the City. STAFFING The Police Department consists of the Director of Public Safety (overseeing the fire departments as well as police), one Patrol Sergeant, two Investigators, seven Patrol Officers, two part-time Community Service Officers, one full-time Administrative Assistant, and one part-time Administrative Assistant. We also have five Reserve Officers. The Medina Reserve Unit logged 853 volunteer hours in 2021. 26 | Page 2021 Annual Report HIGHLIGHTS and ACTIVITIES Training The Department conducted firearms shoots, including a cold weather low light qualifying shoot in December. We continue to use PATROL Online for our licensed officers. PATROL Online has expanded its courses to cover the new training requirements with respect to de-escalation, implicit bias, autism, and managing the mentally ill. We also invited Assistant Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Booker Hodges, to speak to all city employees about implicit bias. Several officers have attended multiple leadership courses this past year put on by the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. We have one officer assigned to the West Metro Drug Task Force (Medina, Minnetrista, Orono, West Hennepin Public Safety, and Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office). In 2021, the taskforce sadly had a record year in cocaine, heroin, and marijuana edibles seizures, seizing 112 pounds of cocaine, 13.2 pounds of heroin, 197 pounds of marijuana edibles, 153 of marijuana, and 104.5 pounds of methamphetamines. The Task Force conducted 110 search warrants and arrested 55 persons. It seized 31 firearms and over $3.1 million dollars in street drugs. This past year, the Task Force became a member of the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA). This is as a direct result of the great work that our local Task Force is doing to combat drug crimes. As a member of this group, the Task Force can partner with the federal authorities and gain access to more resources, such as money and equipment. The Task Force has exceeded all expectations year after year and continues to be one of the state’s top narcotic enforcement groups. Community Service We slowly started to transition back to in person community events. In 2021, we held our annual Bike Rodeo, participated in Medina Celebration Day, Loretto FunFest, Hamel Parade, Hamel Rodeo, Nite to Unite, bike time trails, tours for Boy Scouts, and drive by birthday parties. This is the part of the job the officers truly enjoy. 27 | Page 2021 Annual Report 0 20 40 60 80 100 MURDER RAPE ROBBERY ASSAULTS BURGLARY THEFTS AUTO THEFTS ARSON Murder Rape Robbery Assaults Burglary Thefts Auto Thefts Arson 2021 0 0 0 3 7 65 5 0 2020 0 0 0 2 7 68 5 0 2019 0 0 0 1 14 88 3 0 2018 0 1 0 3 3 74 0 0 2017 0 1 0 2 7 64 2 0 Part One Crime Statistics 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 FORGERY FRAUD STOLEN/THEFT REL. VANDALISM WEAPONS NARCOTICS DWI LIQUOR LAWS Forgery Fraud Stolen/T heft Rel. Vandalis m Weapons Narcotic s DWI Liquor Laws 2021 1 10 24 0 5 16 25 2 2020 6 7 3 0 0 20 24 1 2019 1 11 3 0 1 30 33 8 2018 8 13 4 12 1 44 26 11 2017 12 19 0 15 0 24 62 9 Part Two Crime Statistics 28 | Page 2021 Annual Report Fire Departments The City of Medina is served by four different fire departments. Currently, Hamel Fire covers the northeastern area, Loretto Fire covers the northwestern area, Long Lake Fire covers the southeast area and Maple Plain Fire covers the southwest quadrant of the City. All four departments continue to provide quality fire and emergency services to the City. The four departments responded to 302 calls in 2021, taking approximately 3,140 hours to handle all the calls. The call hours are not a true measurement of service, when one considers the thousands of hours they spend on administrative duties, training, community events and equipment maintenance. Elected officials from Medina and surrounding communities have been meeting regularly, along with all the area fire departments, to consider a more regional fire and emergency service response approach. It was during this time last year that the Hamel and Loretto Fire Departments, who cover approximately 82 percent of the City, decided to look into the possibility of merging the two departments. This is exciting news, and from my perspective, and is a step in the right direction toward long term cost solution for the sharing of equipment and fire coverage for the City. It takes strong leadership to think outside of the box to come up with and be willing to combine forces for the greater good, not only for their prospective organizations, but ultimately for the community as a whole. In early December, the Loretto Fire Department and Police Officers responded to a medical where a caller reported that his father was unresponsive in his bedroom. This call is not an uncommon call, but it took a turn for the worse when the call was found to be for one of the Loretto Fire Department’s own members. Aaron Bidle, 41 years old, married and the father of three young children, had passed away due to a medical situation. This is the first ever active-duty member death 29 | Page 2021 Annual Report for the Loretto Fire Department. It was an honor to be able to assist the family and fire department with the funeral services for Aaron. He will truly be missed. Jason E. Nelson, Director of Public Safety PRIMARY SERVICES The four fire departments provide fire protection for the entire City of Medina. Our fire departments also provide response to accidents, medical calls, HazMat incidents, and emergency management situations. They also provide support for many community functions such as the Hamel Rodeo, Medina Celebration Day, Medina Bike Rodeo, Loretto Funfest, Nite to Unite, food drives for local food shelves, and races just to name a few. Each department holds fundraisers and open houses and provides fire prevention programs to the residents of Medina. All the departments are deeply rooted in their communities and provide exceptional services. STAFFING Each department is staffed differently, and the numbers fluctuate year-to-year. The outlier this year has been that Long Lake indicated that they received 11 new members, which is a big jump in their membership. With a major response, having four fire departments serving Medina is a great resource to draw from when manpower is needed. In addition, the Mutual Aid Agreements amongst all Hennepin County fire departments provide Medina with additional resources. HIGHLIGHTS AND ACTIVITIES HAMEL LORETTO LONG LAKE MAPLE PLAIN Pinning of two new Firefighters 9 members completed Blue Card, 7 members completed FAO, 4 members completed Fire Instructor 1 Hired 11 new firefighters All firefighters completed Blue Card Training Recruited three new members Participated in many Food Truck Community Nights in Corcoran Moved all truck checks to mobile app format Check It/also use as asset management tool Computer Aided Dispatch installed at base station 228 is the greatest number of calls recorded for Medina Purchased Lucas Device, PPE Dryer, 4 Thermal Imagers Partnered with HCMC to test firefighters for COVID and get results in 24-48 hours Upgraded Generator for fire station 30 | Page 2021 Annual Report Total Call Hours 0 1000 2000 3000 HAMEL (2007) LORETTO (779) LONG LAKE (338) MAPLE PLAIN (16) Total Medina Call Hours 0 50 100 150 200 250 HAMEL (228) LORETTO (50) LONG LAKE (23) MAPLE PLAIN (1) Number of Medina Calls Fire Operating Budget 2019 - $362,183 2020 - $368,786 2021 - $358,473 Fire Capital Budget 2019 - $ 97,877 2020 - $ 99,877 2021 - $103,999 Population Served 76% -- Hamel Fire 12% -- Loretto Fire 10.2% -- Long Lake Fire 1.8% -- Maple Plain Fire Geographical Area 54% -- Hamel Fire 28% -- Loretto Fire 17% -- Long Lake Fire 1% -- Maple Plain Fire Market Value Protected 75.6% -- Hamel Fire 12.7% -- Loretto Fire 10.6% -- Long Lake Fire 1.1% -- Maple Plain Fire Fire Chief Leadership Jeff Ruchti – Hamel Fire Jeff Leuer – Loretto Fire James Van Eyll – Long Lake Fire Ray McCoy – Maple Plain Fire FIRE COVERAGE MAP 31 | Page 2021 Annual Report 2021: A Year in Review •Conducted oath of office for Mayor Martin, Councilmembers Cavanaugh, and Reid •Appointed Nicole Jacobson to the position of part-time Administrative Assistant for the Police Department •Appointed Nichole Vogel to the position of part-time Administrative Assistant for the Administration and Finance Departments •Established 2021 appointments and designations to various city services •Adopted an ordinance establishing a planned unit development district for “Weston woods of Medina” and amending the official zoning map January •Approved 2021 Work Plan Goals •Adopted an ordinance amending the City Code pertaining to penalties and targeted residential picketing •Approved amended and restated contract for fire protection with Hamel Volunteer Fire Department •Discussed Hackamore Road Improvement Project •Reviewed Planned Unit Development concept plan for Medina Townhome Development February •Heard annual reports from fire departments •Appointed Nick Zumbusch to the position of Public Works Maintenance Technician •Adopted an ordinance amending regulations pertaining to stormwater management •Reviewed Hunter Lions Park Master Plan March 32 | Page 2021 Annual Report 2021: A Year in Review •Approved 2021 Road Material and Equipment Bids •Held Board of Appeal and Equalization meetings •Held annual public hearing for Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) •Held Annual Medina Clean-Up Day •Appointed John Vinck to the position of Police Officer •Appointed Emily Jans and Katya Cavanaugh to Youth Park Commission Seats April •Recognized Planning Director Dusty Finke for 15 years of service •Heard 2020 annual financial report from auditors •Reviewed Chippewa Road wetland replacement plan May •Approved annual liquor license renewals •Approved an ordinance amending police regulations pertaining to gambling •Reviewed Diamond Lake Regional Trail Master Plan •Held annual park tour for Park Commission and City Council June 33 | Page 2021 Annual Report 2021: A Year in Review •Authorized purchase of body and squad camera for the Police Department •Held public hearing and assessment hearings for Shire Road improvement project and Highcrest Drive and Oak Circle Improvement Project July •Recognized Police Sergeant Kevin Boecker for 20 years of service •Approved assessing agreements with Rolf Erickson and Hennepin County •Attended Night to Unite neighborhood celebrations August •Approved contract for fire protection between City of Maple Plain and City of Medina •Recognized City Administrator Scott Johnson for 10 years of service •Held budget open house and approved 2022 preliminary budget and tax levy •Held Annual Medina Celebration Day •Adopted an ordinance establishing a planned unit development district for Baker Park Townhomes and amended the official zoning map •Recognized Police Officer Andrew Scharf for 5 years of service •Authorized Uptown Hamel Stormwater Analysis September 34 | Page 2021 Annual Report 2021: A Year in Review •Approved Labor Agreement with LELS •Recognized Public Works Operator Greg Leuer for 15 years of service •Recognized Assistant City Administrator Jodi Gallup for 15 years of service •Adopted ordinance amending required swimming pool setbacks from utilities October •Approved liquor license to AGH Ventures LLC (DBA X-Golf) •Approved a service agreement with Solution Builders •Elected to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act •Approved Uptown Hamel Corridor Planning Grant Agreement with Hennepin County November •Approved 2022 tobacco licenses •Adopted resolution establishing polling places for 2022 •Adopted final 2022 budget, tax levy, and fee schedule •Approved Memorandum of Agreement between the State of Minnesota and Local Governments and Authorizing participation of National Opioid Settlements December 35 | Page 2021 Annual Report Preview of 2022 Goals Overarching Organizational Goals •Institutionalize Employee Shared/Core Values. Hold an employee training session and continue the employee discussion on our core values •Continue to stay involved with business networking groups, business forums, business tours, attract business and other opportunities to strengthen ties with our local businesses •Continue to implement electronic document management in the City Administration •Attract campus businesses to Hwy 55 •Switch address databases to the cloud •Continue planning process for Hackamore Road project with the City of Corcoran •Continue to work with the Council and Fire Departments to implement fire services district/JPA Finance •Implement more electronic services •Continue ACH vendor payments and less paper checks •Assist training new staff Planning/Zoning •Review Affordable Workforce Housing Plan •Implement building permit software upgrade •Review electric vehicle charging regulations/policy •Create applicant/developer handbook Public Safety •Establish “Cops and Bobbers” community program •Implement long term animal control solution •Evaluate personnel recruitment, hiring practices, and staffing levels Public Works •Complete street projects •Complete stormwater maintenance procedures and policies •Complete feasibility report for treatment plant expansion •Explore Manganese solutions for water service areas Parks/Trails •Resume Hunter Park renovation •Develop a strategy to complete Lakeshore Park renovations •Continue purchase agreement negotiations for parkland acquisition •Secure easements for Deer Hill preserve Trail 36 | Page 2021 Annual Report Recognizing Our Contributors GRANTS $12,614.68 State Fire Marshal Grant for Fire Services Study $148,490 Hennepin County Youth Sports Program Grant $116,079 Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources for Wolsfed Ravine Stabilization Project $375,557.48 Quiet Zone Grant for Arrowhead Drive 2021 DONATIONS Doboszenski & Sons, Inc Memorial for Ruth Ostrem Hamel Women’s Auxiliary 21st Century Bank Empire Cycle Harbor Freight Tools Rockford Fire Department Hamel Athletic Club American Legion James Victorsen 37 | Page 2021 Annual Report Recognizing Staff & Service Providers Thank you to all of the staff, consultants, and representatives who provided service to the City in 2021. ELECTED OFFICIALS Mayor: Kathleen Martin Council Members: Dino DesLauriers, Todd Albers, Robin Reid, Joe Cavanaugh CITY OF MEDINA STAFF Administration & Finance Department Scott Johnson, City Administrator Jodi Gallup, Assistant City Administrator-City Clerk Erin Barnhart, Finance Director Jennifer Altendorf, Accountant Nichole Vogel, PT Administrative Assistant Public Works Department Steve Scherer, Public Works Director Lisa DeMars, Administrative Assistant Derek Reinking, Foreman Greg Leuer, Water/Sewer Operator & Maint. John Gleason, Maint. Worker/Field Inspector Joe Ende, Maintenance Worker Ivan Dingmann (seasonal part-time) Jeff Bursch (seasonal part-time) Planning and Zoning Department Dusty Finke, Planning Director Debra Dion, Associate Planner Collette Baumgardner, GIS/Planning Intern Police Department Jason Nelson, Public Safety Director Kevin Boecker, Sergeant Josh McKinley, Investigator Anne Klaers, Administrative Assistant Nicole Jacobson, PT Administrative Assistant Officers: Chris McGill, Keith Converse, Tom Gregory, David Hall, Jeremiah Jessen, Andrew Scharf, Justin Hanson, and Kaylen Boeddeker (Jan.), John Vinck (Apr.-Dec.) CSOs: Jackson Billman, Patrick Johnson (Jan.-May), Justin Cook (May-Dec.) APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVES Planning Commission Beth Nielsen, Chairperson Commission Members: Peter Galzki, Cindy Piper, Ron Grajczyk, Justin Popp, Tim Sedabres, Branden Rhem Park Commission John Jacob, Chairperson Commission Members: Mary Morrison, Terry Sharp, Steve Lee, Angela Bernhardt, Troy Hutchinson. Junior Commission Member: Emily Jans and Katya Cavanaugh Other City Appointed Representatives Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission: Elizabeth Weir and Terry Sharp Minnehaha Creek Watershed Commission: Peter Rechelbacher Pioneer-Sarah Creek Watershed Management Commission: Pat Wulff and Mike McLaughlin Police Reserve Officers Michael Chorley, Todd Larson, Mark Ihrke, Ron Dahl, Holly Hanes APPOINTED CONSULTANTS Attorney: Ron Batty, Kennedy and Graven Engineer: Jim Stremel, WSB Assessor: Rolf Erickson, Southwest Assessing Auditors: Abdo, Eick and Meyers Finance Services: Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Prosecuting Attorney: Steve Tallen, Tallen and Baertschi Planning Consultant: Northwest Associated Consultants Building Inspection: Todd Geske, Metro West Inspection Fire Marshal: Todd Geske IT Consultant: Mike Brocco, Cipher Laboratories Resolution No. 2022-## May 3, 2022 Member ________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2022-## RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 686 BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. 686, an ordinance establishing a planned unit development district for “Weston Woods of Medina” and amending the official zoning map; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statues § 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publications by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and WHEREAS, the ordinance is seven pages in length and contains a map; and WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina that the city clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. 686 to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the ordinance in its entirety: Public Notice The city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. 686, an ordinance establishing a planned unit development (PUD) district for “Weston Woods of Medina.” The ordinance rezones property proposed to be subdivided and developed as Weston Woods of Medina to planned unit development. The ordinance rescinds Ordinance 667, which established different standards for the Weston Woods of Medina PUD, but never became effective. The subject property is located north of Highway 55 and east of Mohawk Drive and includes PIDs 0311823130002, 0311823420001, 0311823430005, and 0311823410001. The full text of the ordinance is available from the city clerk at Medina city hall during regular business hours. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina that the city clerk keep a copy of the ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that she post a full copy of the ordinance in a public place within the city. Agenda Item #5B Resolution No. 2022-## 2 May 3, 2022 Dated: May 3, 2022. ______________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ________ upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. ME230-745-787992.v3 1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (the “First Amendment”) is made this ____ day of _____________, 2022, by and between the city of Medina, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota (the “City”), and Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on June 21, 2021, the City and the Developer entered into that certain development agreement, which was filed with the Office of the Registrar of Titles for Hennepin County, Minnesota on July 7, 2021 as Document Number 5847865 (the “Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the Agreement contains various terms and conditions under which the Developer is to develop certain real property legally described therein (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the City, in collaboration with the city of Corcoran, has designed a project along Hackamore Road, which includes the full reconstruction of Hackamore Road between Medina Lake Drive and CSAH 101, and said project is referred to in the Agreement as the “Hackamore Project”; and WHEREAS, section 7c) of the Agreement requires, in part, that the Developer construct that portion of the Hackamore Project adjacent to the northwestern boundary of the Subdivision, as that term is defined in the Agreement, to a point approximately 350 feet east of the northeastern boundary of the Subdivision to accommodate new roadway and a left turn lane into the Subdivision (for purposes of this First Amendment, the “Required Hackamore Construction”); and WHEREAS, the parties have determined that, for numerous reasons, it will better serve the interests of the parties and the public to incorporate said Required Hackamore Construction into the overall Hackamore Project rather than having the Developer construct them, as required in the Agreement; and WHEREAS, accordingly, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to remove the Required Hackamore Construction from the scope of the Subdivision Improvements, as that term is defined in the Agreement, in exchange for payment from the Developer to the City, all in Agenda Item #5C ME230-745-787992.v3 2 accordance with this First Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and the mutual obligations contained herein, the City and the Developer hereby covenant and agree to amend and supplement the Agreement as follows: Section 1. Upon the execution of this First Amendment, the Developer agrees to make a cash payment to the City in the amount of $439,503.77. Immediately upon the making of such payment, the Developer shall thereafter and by operation of contract be wholly discharged of its obligation to incorporate into its plans and to construct, as part of the Subdivision Improvements, the Required Hackamore Construction, which consist of that portion of the Hackamore Project adjacent to the northwestern boundary of the Subdivision to a point approximately 350 feet east of the northeastern boundary of the Subdivision, including roadway reconstruction and a new left turn lane into the Subdivision. Section 2. Unless expressly modified by this First Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same and in full force and effect, including, but certainly not limited to, the Developer’s obligation to retrofit the stormwater pond as summarized in section 7c) of the Agreement. Following said retrofitting and the Developer’s payment to the City contemplated above, the parties agree that the Developer will have no further responsibilities or obligations related to the Hackamore Project. ************************** ME230-745-787992.v3 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to be executed on the day and year first above written. CITY OF MEDINA By: __________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor By: __________________________________ Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2022, by Kathleen Martin and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public ME230-745-787992.v3 4 PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF _________ ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________, 2022, by ___________________, the _______________________ of Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ____________________________________ Notary Public This document drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. __________________________________________________________________ 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Medina City Council FROM: Nate Sparks DATE: April 27, 2022 MEETING DATE: May 3, 2022 RE: 342 Hamel Road – Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review CITY FILE: LR-22-314 BACKGROUND Hamel Townhomes LLC has made an application for preliminary plat and site plan review of the “Hamel Townhomes” project located on an approximate 2-acre site at 342 Hamel Road. The project consists of 30 townhomes which results in a development density of approximately 14 units per acre. The concept plan for the project was reviewed by the Planning Commission in November of last year and by the City Council in December. Meeting minutes from these discussions are attached for reference. The site is located in the City’s UH, Uptown Hamel zoning district. PROJECT SITE The site currently covers two parcels of land. The westerly parcel measures 0.98 acres in size and has an existing house. The easterly parcel measures 1.17 acres in size and is vacant. The two parcels are owned in common. The site is located on the north side of Hamel Road and east of Hunter Drive. The site is immediately adjacent to the City’s Rainwater Nature Area, which is located to the west. There are single family homes on the south side of Hamel Road, which are zoned Urban Residential. To the east are six single family homes and property owned by St. Anne’s Church, which are zoned Uptown Hamel. The north boundary of the site is bordered by the Soo line railroad tracks. The site slopes from the road to the tracks (south to north) approximately 16 feet. An aerial of the subject site and surrounding property is provided at the top of the following page. Agenda Item #8A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONING As noted as part of the concept plan consideration, the subject site is guided “Uptown Hamel” in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The “Uptown Hamel” land use category allows residential and commercial uses to be mixed on adjacent sites and to be mixed within the same building or property. Residential development in this designation may be between 4.0 and 15.0 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan further states the following: The “Uptown Hamel” land use allows for a mix of residential and commercial uses to create a vibrant, walkable, and attractive place; a place to shop, work and live. Objectives: 1. Allow a mix of residential and commercial uses to co-exist on adjacent parcels as well as within the same structure or on the same parcel. Uptown Hamel is intended to provide flexibility in terms of residential and commercial uses. As a result, it is difficult to project future uses in the area, but it is estimated that approximately 40% of the land will be utilized for residential purposes, 40% for commercial uses, and 20% for office uses. 2. Consider alternatives for meeting parking requirements including parking in the rear of buildings, shared parking, on-street, underground, or ramp parking. 3. Use building standards that enhance and maintain the small-town heritage and traditional small-town look including brick facades, traditional street lighting, and overhangs over the sidewalk, boardwalks, and the like. Establishment of design guidelines to support this objective. 4. Involve residents, businesses, community groups and other stakeholders in the planning of these areas. 5. Create master plans for mixed-use areas to ensure integration of uses and responsiveness to adjacent land uses. 6. Establish design criteria for platting and developing site plans which will be compatible with surrounding physical features, existing land uses and the preservation of ecologically significant natural resources. 7. Encourage underground or structured parking through flexibility to standards, including increased residential density up to 20 units per acre. 8. Emphasize resident and pedestrian safety. 9. Require utilities to be placed underground wherever possible for reasons of aesthetic enhancement and safety. 10. Regulate noise, illumination, and odors as needed to maintain public health and safety.” The City implements the “Uptown Hamel” designation with the UH, Uptown Hamel zoning district. The purpose of this district is stated to be: To create a distinctive Uptown Hamel area that is an attractive, pedestrian-friendly, mixed- use town center, by using building facades, porches, walkways, landscaped plazas, lighting, signage, landscaping and parking to blend retail, office, higher-density housing, specialty shops, and gathering spots into a unified and viable community. The Comprehensive Plan allows 4 to 15 units per acre. The UH District states that the minimum lot area per dwelling unit is 2,904 square feet. Both standards state that the maximum development density is 15 units per acre. According to the received survey, the subject site measures is 2.141 acres in size. This allows for a range of 9 to 32 dwelling units on the site. Thus, the proposed number of dwelling units upon the site (30) is consistent with both the Comprehensive Plan and applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Like the previously considered concept plan, the applicant is proposing the construction of 30 townhomes on the property (within five buildings), which is a density of about 14 units per acre. The units are proposed as a mix of three and four bedrooms. Each unit is proposed with a two- car garage. The site is proposed to have two eight, one six, and two four-unit buildings. The four-unit buildings are facing Hamel Road with the others behind. To accommodate the proposal, the following approvals are necessary: 1. Preliminary Plat 2. Site Plan Review APPLICATION REVIEW Preliminary Plat Existing Conditions The subject site is comprised of two parcels of land which are described by metes and bounds. To accommodate the project, the two parcels must be combined to create a base lot and unit lots which correspond to the footprints of the various townhome units. Lot Requirements The UH, Uptown Hamel zoning district does not impose a minimum site area or width requirements. Easements The preliminary plat must include drainage and utility easements as required by Ordinance. The preliminary plat indicates that a drainage and utility easement is to be established over all of Outlot A. It also appears that the drive-aisle extends outside of Outlot A. Staff recommends that the plat be updated so that the drive aisle does not extend into lots. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, all easements must be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Park Dedication The proposed townhome development does not include any park land dedication. The City’s Park and Trail plan does not identify parkland or trail needs within the vicinity of the property. The City Subdivision Ordinance states that, in every subdivision of land, a reasonable portion of the buildable land, not to exceed 10 percent, must be dedicated by the owners to the City for parks. Alternatively, a cash contribution can be made in lieu of land dedication. Staff anticipates requiring cash-in-lieu of land dedication. The required fee is 8% of the pre- developed market value of the land, with a minimum of $3500 per unit. Staff anticipates that the minimum fee of $3500 (total of $98,000 for 28 new lots) will apply. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, the applicant must satisfy the park dedication requirements of the City. Staff presented to the Park Commission at their April 20 meeting. Site Plan Review Site Access & Circulation Access to the townhome units is provided internally via looped drive which is to be private in nature. Appropriately, the internal drive measures 24 feet in width. Townhome units located in the southeastern and southwestern areas of the site are to be accessed via a secondary drive aisle. The Ordinance allows the width of secondary drive aisles to be reduced to 22 feet. The drive aisles in these areas are measured at 22 feet in width and meet this standard. The City’s parking ordinance does not allow dead-end drive lanes, to the extent practicable. As part of concept plan review, concern was raised that narrowed drive aisle widths will create backing space problems for the units in the southeast and southwest corners of the site. While backing areas have been provided, it is important to note that such areas are also specified as snow storage locations. As a condition of site plan approval, it is recommended that snow storage not occur in such areas. Vehicle backing area concerns also exists in regard to the twinhome unit located in the extreme northwest corner of the site. Staff recommends that the driveway and drive-aisle be arranged differently for this unit. The townhome units are provided driveways which measure 19 feet in length. This will require that vehicles park very close to the garage doors to ensure that the drive-aisle is clear. It may be advisable to delineate the drive aisle for the sake of enforcement. The driveways to the units on the south side of the project are only 8 feet in depth and will be required to be signed as “no parking” to meet the fire code. As suggested as part of concept plan review, truck turning movement diagrams have been submitted for review. Specifically, tuning movements for garbage, fire and moving trucks are illustrated. While it has been demonstrated that such vehicles can maneuver within the looped drive, access to the townhome units within the dead-end drive aisles (located in the southwest and southeast areas of the site) have not been demonstrated. As a condition of site plan approval, truck access to the southwest and southeast townhome buildings should be demonstrated by the applicant. The Uptown Hamel District encourages connections to neighboring properties. As part of concept plan review, staff suggested that a drive aisle be made to be capable of connecting to future sites to the east. During concept plan review, the project was presented as rental townhomes, but now are proposed to be individually owned. If the project were under common ownership, staff believed it was advisable to provide a viable opportunity to connect to the east. The owners/developers of the projects may have found it in their interests to collaborate on access. With individually owned units, staff believes such collaboration is very unlikely. While the drive aisle located in the southeast corner of the site could potentially be extended eastward, its width (22 feet) is not considered sufficient for such purpose. If an intent exists to provide an easterly drive aisle connection at some future point, it should be specified on the site plan and measure not less than 24 feet in width. In addition, the applicant’s grading plan shows the east end of this drive aisle to be four feet below the grade at the adjacent property line. Practically, this would require substantial grading on the property to the east if redevelopment were to occur in order for the driveway to be continued. Staff believes that designing it in this way does not provide a viable potential connection to the east. As part of the subdivision requirements, it is within the City’s discretion to require right-of- way or easement for a connection (similar to an alley) at whatever location is deemed appropriate. Staff discussed this possibility at length and believed while there may be value in establishing an alley which could be extended to the east, there were also several complexities. With the uncertainty of timing and type of construction to the east, the consensus of staff was to not require dedication and construction of a public alley. While the site plan identifies snow storage areas, the location of such areas is concerning. The snow storage areas in the southwest and southeast areas of the site overlay vehicle backing spaces while the storage area in the northern area of the site abuts the central townhome building. These concerns suggest that there is not ample area on the site for snow storage and that removal of snow to an off-site location will be necessary. Building Setbacks For this type of use, the UH District does not impose a minimum front yard setback requirement. The minimum required side yard setback is eight feet. The rear yard setback is stated as “an amount determined by the City which is necessary to provide adequate parking, access and loading for people and goods, fire access/control or to meet other Ordinance requirements.” The proposed development has a setback of 4.8 feet from the front lot line with porches that extend to the lot line. The side yard setbacks are eight feet. Architecture The UH District states that from the street, “building design shall make the street visually more interesting, functionally more enjoyable and useful and economically more viable. Buildings, porches, and plaza spaces shall be designed to bring the building and its activity more in contact with the street.” According to the Ordinance, exterior materials are required to consist of one or more of the following: natural brick, stucco, stone, wood, glass, or commercial grade fiber cement lap siding with a wood appearance which is installed per manufacturer’s specifications. Treated or anodized metal may be used for trim. The Ordinance also states that windows and openings are required to be generous, especially on the street side, and their placement and design shall express the pedestrian friendly, livability of the town center. Buildings are required to be modulated a minimum of once per 40 feet in frontage to avoid long, monotonous building walls. This modulation may include varying building height, building setback, or building materials/design. Further, the Ordinance states that, at the street level, at least 30 percent of the façade must be glass in windows and doors. As part of concept plan review, a primary concern was the appearance of building facades which face Hamel Road. The City Council specifically suggested that front elevations along Hamel Road be reworked to project a storefront design which fits within Uptown Hamel. The applicant has provided a revised building elevation plan which is intended to respond to feedback received during the concept plan review process. Building elevation changes are summarized below: Front Elevations (along Hamel Road) • Front porch canopies have been expanded to extend along the entire front facade. • Cultured stone has been added as a finish material to the base of the central gable (previously vertical siding). • Horizontal, rather than vertical siding, is proposed on the ground floor of the east and west gables. • The street facing front will have a fence type railing feature along the front of the porch. Front Elevations (internal to the site) • Doorway areas are to be finished in cultured stone rather than vertical siding. • Front porch canopies have been expanded to extend along the entire front facade. • The width of four (of the eight) second floor windows has been reduced. • The location of the smaller gables has been changed such that they present a symmetrical, rather than asymmetrical, facade. Side Elevations: • Windows have been eliminated. (After the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant resubmitted a plan showing windows on the sides of the two southern buildings.) • Vertical siding has been replaced with a mixture of horizonal and vertical siding. In consideration of the revised building elevations, the following comments are offered: 1. The proposed building materials should be more specific to ensure that Ordinance standards are being met and that the appearance of the buildings is consistent with other buildings of a similar nature within the district. For instance, while lap siding and vertical siding are identified as exterior finish materials, siding materials are not identified. Staff recommends that plans be updated to specify materials consistent with Uptown Hamel requirements (wood, engineered wood, cement board etc.). 2. It appears that the provided elevations are approximately 30 percent glass on the main level if measured linearly and that sufficient modulation has been provided. 3. The UH district states that porches along Hamel Road are a feature of Uptown Hamel. The applicant proposes a covered feature intended to address this provision. These features are at-grade and similar to the patios of the other buildings. The features are covered and proposed to include railings to give more of a delineated porch-like feel adjacent to the sidewalk. 4. According to the site plan, units within the townhome building #3 located in the northwest area of the site are to be walkout units. The submitted building elevations show more of a covered deck overhanging the lower level and no porch. During Concept Plan review, there were comments from City Council members regarding the appearance of these units from the Rainwater Nature Area and finding that the porch appearance was important from this vantage. 5. Assuming the southern buildings are to be similar in design, concern exists in regard to the appearance of the south façades of buildings (especially building #4 as it will be visible from Hamel Road). In this regard, a “blank” façade with little undulation is of concern. It is recommended that the south façades be modified to provide greater visual interest. This may include the addition of windows (as included in the previous concept plan submittal) and/or mimicked design features of the front facades located along Hamel Road. 6. In consideration of the revised building elevations, the City Council should provide feedback as to whether the building elevation changes, particularly those to the Hamel Road façade are consistent with the City’s vision for Uptown Hamel. Off-Street Parking The City’s parking ordinance requires townhomes to provide two parking spaces per unit plus 0.25 spaces per unit for guest parking. For general townhomes, this would require a two-car garage with a minimum size of 400 square feet. In the UH District this can be one parking space in a garage of at least 240 square feet and one outside parking space. The applicant is proposing a two-car garage attached to each unit. The size of the garage appears to generally meet the townhome standard of 400 square feet. This should, however, be demonstrated by the applicant as a condition of site plan approval. It appears the intent is also to provide space to park in front of most of the garages. The site plan also shows eight guest parking spaces, which is the minimum required. These stalls will be required to be 9’ x 19’ in size to meet minimum standards. Pedestrian Ways & Recreation The applicant is depicting a small dog area and a gazebo structure near the northwest corner of the site. As part of concept plan review, Staff recommended that a dog waste station be installed. While not specified on the site plan, the installation of such waste station will be made a recommended condition of site plan approval. The submitted site plan illustrates sidewalks along the south property line of the site and on east side of townhome building # 2 (located in the southwest corner of the site). A gravel path is also illustrated in the northwest corner of the site As part of concept plan review, it was suggested that a connection from the site to the adjacent Rainwater Nature Preserve be explored as an appropriate amenity. The site plan indicates that the front yard sidewalk will connect to an existing trail segment to the west. The gravel path also connects to the Nature Preserve. Staff recommends that the sidewalks be provided with bituminous, concrete, paver, or similar surfacing rather than gravel. The path area also serves as an overflow drainageway, so erosion and sedimentation is a concern. Impervious Surfaces, Grading & Drainage The Uptown Hamel District allows for up to 90 percent impervious surface coverage. The site is proposed at 82 percent coverage. Stormwater improvements were constructed to treat some additional runoff in the Uptown Hamel Area, but new hardcover in excess of approximately 65 percent will need to be treated on-site. The applicant has indicated that treatment may be provided with underground filtration in the northwest portion of the site. As a condition of site plan approval, issues related to retaining walls, grading and drainage should be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. Of particular note is information to show that no impacts will occur to property or trees on the adjacent property to the east. Lighting A lighting plan has yet to be received. As a condition of site plan approval, a lighting plan must be submitted which meets applicable City Code requirements. Tree Preservation As suggested as part of concept plan review, a tree inventory has been provided by the applicant (included on the boundary survey). In total, 88 trees exist upon the site, 71 of which are considered significant. According to the submitted removals plan, all existing trees on the site are to be removed. The Ordinance states that sites measuring 1.1 to 5.0 acres in size are allowed to remove 15 percent of significant trees for initial site development and an additional 15 percent for other development activities. A significant tree is defined as a healthy, deciduous tree measuring eight inches in diameter or greater, or a healthy coniferous tree measuring four inches or greater in diameter. As indicated, a total of 71 significant trees are to be removed which equates to 950 caliper inches. The applicant has a net significant replacement obligation of 665 caliper inches which may occur off-site. As a condition of site plan approval, the applicant must satisfy the significant tree replacement requirements of the City. The tree preservation ordinance includes provisions for partial waiver of replacement requirements if an applicant shows that practices have been incorporated to limit tree removal. It is the applicant’s responsibility to provide such information for consideration, which has not been provided at this time. Landscaping The Uptown Hamel District requires that at least five percent of the site be devoted to a plaza or be landscaped. Landscaping must consist of a combination of decorative deciduous and coniferous trees, shrubs, flowers, ground covers and rain gardens. Landscaped areas and pockets shall be delineated and separated by any of the following: curbing, decorative fencing, decorative walls, planter boxes, containers, “cut outs” in a plaza, or by similar means. All that part of the site not taken up by buildings, walks, or plazas or approved parking and loading must be landscaped. According to the applicant, 82 percent of the site is to be impervious surface. Thus, 18 percent of the site is to be devoted to landscaped area. As required, a landscape plan has been submitted for review. The plan calls for a significant amount of vegetation on the site, both along the perimeter of the site and internally. Specifically, the following plantings are proposed: Quantity Deciduous Trees 33 Evergreen Trees 26 Ornamental Trees 28 Shrubs 133 Grasses 258 Perennials 183 Overall, the landscape plan is considered well-conceived and should contribute to the attractiveness of the townhome project. Staff believes it is appropriate to consider much of the proposed tree planting toward the required tree replacement requirements noted above. Of particular note is that fifteen trees appear to be proposed within the Hamel Road right-of- way. The acceptability of such plantings should be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer and Public Works Department. Storage & Screening No exterior recycling/trash handling areas are illustrated on the site plan. As a condition of site plan approval, all materials and facilities for recycling and trash must be kept inside the townhome buildings. Staff also recommends that the applicant submit a solid waste plan which has been agreed to by a service provider. Locating trash and recycling bins and allowing adequate circulation for the garbage trucks and vehicles leaving garages will require consideration, especially for the dead-end access drives with short garage approaches. As shown on the submitted site plan, a six-foot high, wooden privacy fence is proposed along the north property line, just inside a proposed retaining wall. According to the Ordinance, fences and walls shall be decorative using a traditional design and may be used to delineate and separate spaces and to protect topographic change. Fence material shall be wrought iron, anodized steel or aluminum, or wood. Walls shall be made of brick, concrete brick, decorative block, cedar or redwood or stucco on concrete. The height and material of the privacy fence meets the requirements of the Ordinance. It appears that chain link fencing is proposed around the dog exercise area located along the site’s north boundary. To be noted however, is that chain link fencing locations are not specified on the site plan nor is such fence type allowed by Ordinance. As a condition of site plan approval, the type, height and location of all site fencing should be indicated on the site plan and shall comply with ordinance requirements. PARK COMMISSION REVIEW The Park Commission reviewed the proposed plat at the April 20 meeting. The applicant proposes no park or trail improvements. The City’s Park Plan does not identify the need for parkland in the vicinity of the subject site. The City’s Trail Plan identifies an east-west “Lake Sarah Regional Trail Search Corridor” along Hamel Road. Three Rivers Park District has not yet initiated a Master Plan on this potential future regional trail. Staff considered whether it was a good opportunity to secure at trail easement along the north of the subject site (adjacent to the railroad right-of-way) to allow flexibility for a future trail, including the potential future regional trail. The trail could be easily continued through Rainwater Park to the west, but staff noted that there were some factors on property further to the east which may reduce the likelihood of a trail being extended. There is steep topography south of the railroad tracks and burials are located very close to the top of the bluff. Nonetheless, staff thought it may be worth considering securing an easement to provide maximum flexibility. The applicant is proposing a private access to the Rainwater Nature Area from within the project. Due to the aforementioned grade changes, it is being proposed with stairs. The City Subdivision Ordinance states that, in every subdivision of land, a reasonable portion of the buildable land, not to exceed 10 percent, must be dedicated by the owners to the City for parks. Alternatively, a cash contribution can be made in lieu of land dedication. The market value is projected to result in a park cash-in-lieu fee at the minimum $3500 per unit, but will be confirmed by City Assessor. This would be a total of $98,000 for 28 new lots. The Park Commission discussed the potential of a trail easement and determined that it was unlikely that a trail would be extended to the east. As a result, the Park Commission recommended cash-in-lieu of land dedication. REVIEW CRITERIA Preliminary Plat Section 820.21 Subd. 10 establishes the following criteria for the review of subdivisions: “In the case of all subdivisions, the City shall deny approval of a preliminary or final plat if one or a combination of the following findings are made: (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city, or that the proposed subdivision is premature, as defined in Section 820.28. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. If the Council makes any of the above findings, a preliminary plat can be denied. If the Council does not make specifically make one or more of these findings, the preliminary plat should be approved. Site Plan Review The City has a relatively low level of discretion when reviewing the Site Plan Review. The purpose of a Site Plan Review is to review compliance with relevant land use regulations. If the proposed construction does not meet specific requirements, it can be denied. If the construction meets relevant requirements, it should be approved. The City can apply conditions as necessary to ensure compliance with City requirements and to protect the public health, safety and welfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION As part of the Planning Commission’s consideration of the concept plan, a primary concern was that of excessive density. The applicant has however, chosen to maximize the allowed density on the site and move forward the plan to construct 30 townhomes on the property. While such proposed density does impact site circulation, snow storage capabilities, green space, site amenities, etc., the applicant has attempted to respond to feedback received as part of the concept plan review process and mitigate such concerns. A primary issue raised as part of concept plan review was that of the street forward design and the appearance of front building facades along Hamel Road and along the visible side adjacent to the park. It was specifically suggested by City Officials that the design of the front facades be modified to provide greater architectural significance and “fit” with the vision of Uptown Hamel. The question of whether this project aligns with the City’s vision of Uptown Hamel is considered a policy matter to the determined by City Officials. If the City is inclined to support the project, as it appears to generally meet the City’s zoning requirements, Planning Staff would recommend the following: A. Approval of the Hamel Townhomes Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions: 1. All easements shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. Plat shall be updated such that the drive aisle is not located within lots. 3. The applicant shall pay park dedication fee in lieu of land dedication in a minimum amount of 8% of the pre-developed market value of the property, with a minimum of $3500 per lot. 4. The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include the conditions described below as well as other requirements of city ordinance or policy. 5. The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated 3/22/2022 except as may be modified herein. Final plans shall be provided at the time of final plat and shall address the comments of the City Engineer, Fire Marshal, Elm Creek Watershed District, other relevant staff and agencies and the conditions noted herein. The plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. The Applicant shall obtain all permits required by Elm Creek Watershed District, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council and any other relevant agencies. 6. The Applicant shall provide title evidence prior to or at the time of final plat application and abide by the recommendations of the City Attorney with regard to title matters and recording instructions. 7. The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site improvements to ensure completion. 8. The Applicant shall execute and record a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney to describe the responsibility of the property owners to maintain the private stormwater improvements. 9. The final plat application shall be filed within 180 days of the date of this resolution or the approval hereby granted shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council. 10. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, construction plans, and other relevant documents. 11. Comments of other City Staff. B. Approval of the Hamel Townhomes Site Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. Contingent upon approval of the Hamel Townhomes plat. 2. Snow storage shall not occur in designated vehicle backing areas and provisions shall be provided for disposing snow in an off-site location. 3. Vehicle backing provisions shall be provided for the townhome units in the northwest and northeast corners of the site. 4. The submitted truck access diagrams shall be expanded to demonstrate an ability to access units in the southwest and southeast townhome buildings. 5. If an intent exists to provide an easterly drive aisle connection to the abutting property to the east at some future point, such intent shall be specified on the site plan. Such drive aisle connection shall measure not less than 24 feet in width. 6. The type of proposed building finishes shall be more specific as to reference both siding type and siding material and be consistent with the requirements of Uptown Hamel 7. Building elevations which correspond to the intended design of all townhome buildings, including walkouts, shall be submitted. 8. The south façade of townhome buildings shall be modified to provide greater visual interest. This may include the addition of windows (as included in the previous concept plan submittal) and/or mimicked design features of the front facades located along Hamel Road. 9. The Planning Commission shall provide feedback as to whether the building elevation changes, particularly those to the Hamel Road façades are consistent with the City’s vision for Uptown Hamel. 10. The applicant shall demonstrate that size of the garages meets the minimum townhome standard of 400 square feet. 11. Guest parking stalls shall measure not less than 9’ x 19’ in size. 12. A dog waste station shall be installed. 13. The Applicant shall submit a solid waste plan to the satisfaction of the service provider for trash and recycling pickup. 14. Issues related to retaining walls, grading and drainage shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. 15. A lighting plan shall be submitted which meets applicable City Code requirements. 16. The applicant shall satisfy the significant tree replacement requirements of the City by providing off-site planting of 480 inches of trees or a contribution of $100 per inch to the City’s reforestation and woodland management fund. 17. The acceptability of trees proposed to be planted in the Hamel Road right-of-way shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer and Public Works Department. 18. All materials and facilities for recycling and trash shall be kept inside the townhome buildings. 19. The type, height and location of all site fencing shall be indicated on the site plan and shall comply with applicable Ordinance requirements. 20. Comments of other City Staff. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed the plans at their April 12, 2022 meeting and held a public hearing. One written comment was received for the hearing and read aloud as requested by the submitter. This comment is attached for reference. The Planning Commission found that the site plan was inconsistent with the requirements of the Uptown Hamel District and voted to recommend denial of all applications by a 5-1 vote. The Commissioners cited concern with the architectural appearance of the units not clearly meeting the intent of the Uptown Hamel District, the lack of connectivity to neighboring properties, poor circulation on the southern portion of the development, lack of plaza space, lack of green space, and limited internal walkability. The Commissioner’s general consensus was that the unit type and density sought by the applicant created a situation that was too dense for the site. If the Council were to accept this recommendation, it would be appropriate to make findings of denial for the preliminary plat as described in the review criteria above and to identify the specific requirements which are not met related to the site plan. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Excerpt from 4/12//2022 Planning Commission minutes 2. Public comment received 3. Excerpt from 12/7/2021 City Council minutes 4. Engineering Comments dated 4/1/22 5. Parks and Trails Plan 6. Preliminary Plat 7. Hamel Townhomes Plan Set Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 04/12/2022 Minutes 1 Public Hearing – Hamel Townhome LLC – 342 Hamel Road – Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review for Development of 30 Townhomes (PIDs 1211823420015 and 1211823420016) Sparks presented a request for a Preliminary Plat and Site Plan review for the development of 30 townhomes at 342 Hamel Road. He noted that the subject site is two parcels that total about 2.1 acres in size and within the Uptown Hamel zoning district. He reviewed the adjacent property uses. He stated that the Commission did review a Concept Plan for this at its November meeting. He stated that there would be a mix of three- and four-bedroom units. He stated that the property would be platted with each townhome having its own unit to convey to individual property owners while the drive aisles and perimeter would remain in an outlot to be owned by the HOA. He stated that the property density does fall within the permitting range for the zoning district. He provided additional details on the proposed architectural elements, proposed parking, and drive aisle width and length. He noted a potential connection that could be made to the east but most likely would not work because of the grade change between properties. He reviewed details related to stormwater management, retaining walls, and fencing along with additional comments related to those items. He reviewed the other comments within the staff report related to the proposed application. He provided additional details on the tree removal, landscaping plan, and offsite planting that would be required. Sedabres referenced the material proposed for the front which is described as lap siding and asked for additional clarification. Sparks replied that a fiber cement lap siding would be proposed with a wood appearance. Sedabres asked if the front porch would overhang the sidewalk. Sparks replied that the overhang would end at the edge of the property line before the sidewalk starts. Popp asked if the dimensions of the porches facing Hamel Road were provided. Sparks replied that the porches protrude about three to four feet towards the road. Popp stated that he was attempting to determine if the porch would be functional or more of a façade. He asked if there have been any renderings that would show the landscaping from Hamel Road. Sparks replied that there is a landscaping plan included in the plans, although it was not included in his presentation. He stated that trees would be provided around the perimeter of the site and then between the driveways there would be additional plantings. He stated that the landscaping plan generally meets the requirements of the City. Popp asked if a lighting plan has been submitted. Sparks replied that has not yet been submitted. Rhem stated that it appears there is connectivity to the Rainwater Park and asked for more details. Sparks commented on the north side of the property there would be a stairway that goes down into the nature area. He stated that the front sidewalk would also connect to the bituminous trail in the Rainwater Nature Area. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 04/12/2022 Minutes 2 Matthew Eller, representing the applicant, stated that they listened to the input received from the Concept Plan review and incorporated those changes into their submittal. He believed that this will be a great asset to Hamel, and they look forward to moving forward in the process. Nielsen stated that there were a number of conditions recommended by staff and asked if the applicant has any concerns with those conditions. Eller commented that the conditions are reasonable and that they can comply with those conditions. Nielsen opened the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. Finke commented that a letter was received that he forwarded to the members of the Commission on which a number of property owners signed and asked for the letter to be read in its entirety. He read the letter which was also submitted as a part of the record. Nielsen closed the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. Grajczyk thanked those that are looking to invest in the community and assist in the growth of Uptown Hamel. He commented that there are similar properties developed with townhomes in Hamel that are similar in design or idea. He stated that he does like the design and idea but feels that this proposal is too crowded given the nature of the area and residents that live in adjacent areas. He acknowledged that the zoning would allow this density range but believed 30 units to be too many. He stated that there could also be a challenge to get safety equipment into the site with this design if there were an emergency situation. He stated that a lack of greenspace in the front of the project area also stands out as something different from other properties. He stated that he would like to see something more spread out and open. Popp appreciated the letter from the residents. He stated that he does not share some of the concerns within that letter, such as density. He noted that this falls within the allowed range of density and in order to meet the projections of the Metropolitan Council, the City will need density in some areas. He stated that he does have concern with circulation, architectural design, and street appeal. He stated that the lack of plaza and/or greenspace is concerning. He was unsure that the renderings do enough to make that street appeal inviting to residents of the community. He was also concerned with lack of connectivity to the neighboring property. He stated that the isolation of this design and lack of connectivity is a concern. Piper commented that this proposal feels too crowded. She asked if there is a similar development at 500 Hamel Road and whether this development would allow for children. Eller commented that the intent is to sell the units for purchase and there is no restriction for children. Piper commented that this would make her lean further towards this being too crowded as there would be no place for children to exercise other than driveways. She was also concerned with circulation. Rhem stated that he struggles with this request as the requirements are pretty much met which makes the review subjective. He agreed there are similarities to the townhome development down the road. He stated that he does like the connectivity to the Rainwater Park. He noted that although he had concerns with circulation, those appear to be addressed through the staff recommendations. He stated that the other challenge would be related to the architecture facing Hamel Road, which could be improved to ensure it does not look like the back of a building. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 04/12/2022 Minutes 3 Sedabres asked if this proposal would extend the width of Hamel Road to match existing properties or leave in place the existing width of Hamel Road. Eller commented that they would leave the width of Hamel Road as it is now. Sedabres commented that although some of the Uptown Hamel criteria are met, this is not what he pictures for Uptown Hamel. He noted that this is a unique area with only so many lots available and this should look more welcoming and walkable. He stated that this is too much asphalt and lack of greenspace. He stated that this is not the level of aesthetic and look he would have for Uptown Hamel. Nielsen asked why the change was made from rental to ownership. Eller commented that there is a housing shortage and there are a lot of people interesting in owning at a good price and this project would lend itself towards that. Nielsen stated that she shares the concerns of the other members noting that this feels too dense. She noted that she would prefer to see this as rental as there is a need in the area. She agreed that greenspace is lacking. She stated that she could support the density if the visual from Hamel Road were improved. Eller commented that from a development standpoint, they review the criteria the City has in place and then attempted to comply with the comments received from the Concept Plan review. He stated that in terms of circulation, they design to the specifications provided by the Fire Marshal and noted that their plan would comply with those specifications. He stated that this property could support up to 32 units and they have requested 30 units which is within the range. He stated that it is difficult when they design to the Code but then receive the comment that it is still not enough. He believed that this is a great site, and the development would be a benefit to Hamel. He stated that there is a lot of open space to the west and a 37-acre park across the street where kids would play. Nielsen stated that there were several concerns with the visual design of the units facing Hamel Road. Eller stated that is something they could look at and present something that fits more with the desired aesthetic. He stated that in the overall design and the picture shown in the concept image, he believes that to be a nice-looking unit that would be inviting. He recognized that the two-dimensional sketch was very sterile in its appearance. Nielsen asked about the blank wall. Eller replied that windows would be added to that side wall. He stated that they could also work on the aesthetics of the Hamel Road facing units, as he wants the community to be proud of the development. Sedabres stated that there was a reference of a Councilmember in a previous review which referenced a development in another community that had varying heights and materials that break up the wall appearance and give it more interest. Motion by Rhem to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat and Site Plan review for the development of 30 townhomes at 342 Hamel Road subject to the conditions recommended by staff and additional modulation against Hamel Road. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 04/12/2022 Minutes 4 Motion failed for lack of a second. Motion by Grajczyk, seconded by Piper, to recommend denial of the Preliminary Plat and Site Plan review for the development of 30 townhomes at 342 Hamel Road. A roll call vote was performed: Grajczyk aye Popp aye Piper aye Rhem nay Sedabres aye Nielsen aye Motion carried. April 11th, 2022 Medina Planning Commission & City Council 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Dear City of Medina Planning Commission and Medina City Council, As residents and homeowners on Hamel Road, we are completely against the development of 30 rental units on the land at 342 Hamel Road. We request that our concerns be read aloud in its entirety and made part of the records for both the planning commission meeting and any city council meeting that discusses this proposed development. Our concerns are as follows: • Traffic- This will impact Hamel Road immensely, 30+ units will increase traffic and cause issues with so many vehicles going in and out of one driveway. • Parking- This design does not provide enough off-street parking for residents and visitors. Hamel Road cannot accommodate this volume of additional street parking. • Lack of Green Space! Speaks for itself, there just isn't any space between units or buildings. • Too Dense- there is very little space between units and surrounding neighbors, units infringe upon others property. • Uptown Hamel -this type of housing doesn't fit into the Uptown Hamel area nor does it fit in with the current makeup of the surrounding neighborhood. This is an area made up of neighbors who have lived here for many years and want to continue to see it as a neighborhood where people know each other and have a stake in and care about the development of the community. Again, it needs to be said, there is the concern that the City of Medina is introducing a proposed development on property that is owned by a standing member of its city council. This development is a conflict of interest and should not be allowed when someone sits in a position to have a direct effect on the decision making and approval process. The job of the city council is to represent the people of the city and do what is in the best interest of the community and its people, not develop their personal property. Even if said council member abstains from voting on this project, the council member has put other members in a position that they may not feel comfortable voting with their honest option or in the community's best interest. The City of Medina City Council needs to understand and be aware of how this looks inappropriate to members of its community. Sincerely, David & Brooke LaPree 242 Hamel Road Howard & Lori Schaber 252 Hamel Road John & Barb Mengelkoch 262 Hamel Road Thomas Manning & Brookstyn Nelson 282 Hamel Road Judy Schulte 385 Hamel Road Along with other neighbors who agree with our position but at this time asked not to be included by name. Medina City Council Excerpt from 12/7/2021 Minutes 1 342 Hamel Road – Hamel Townhomes LLC – Concept Plan (9:36 p.m.) Johnson stated that the applicant requested a concept plan review for a 30-unit townhome development on the property located at 342 Hamel Road. DesLauriers recused himself from this discussion. Sparks identified the subject property which is slightly over two acres in size. He stated that the 30 townhome units would be a mix of three- and four-bedroom units, split between five buildings. He stated that the site is zoned Uptown Hamel which specifies a density between four and 15 units per acre and advised that this property falls within that range. He reviewed the adjacent land uses and zoning. He reviewed the relative zoning regulations and how the request would meet those regulations. He highlighted the staff comments related to the drive lane, connectivity, stormwater management, tree preservation and replacement, and landscaping and lighting plans. He provided the renderings of the proposed buildings and related potential floorplans. He stated that this request was heard by the Planning Commission and noted that some members believed this plan was a misalignment with the Uptown Hamel zoning district and did not prefer this development for the site. He stated that it was also mentioned that this density would not be preferred for the site. He stated that more parking may also be necessary in order to accommodate three- and four-bedroom units. He stated that the comment was also made that this development feels isolated and lacks connectivity. He stated that if the Council did not feel that this type of development is a fit for the Uptown Hamel zoning district, staff would recommend a moratorium on development in order for specific standards to be created for that zoning district. He noted that currently the Uptown Hamel district does not have a lot of specificity in its standards. Martin suggested that they begin with the vision for Uptown Hamel. She stated that she has no issue with townhomes along Hamel Road that would have significant density. She stated that her focus is on the storefront, which would be the buildings adjacent to Hamel Road, and how that would look to passersby. She stated that the homes on the front should have architectural significance and acknowledged that the homes in the back of the development would not need to mirror that look. Albers stated that there are twin homes down the road from this location and therefore did not believe townhomes would be problematic for this site. He commented that this does feel dense but understands why this number of homes would be proposed. He also expressed concern with the storefront and the vision for the units facing Hamel Road. Reid commented that she intensely dislikes this plan as she believes that the density is too high. She commented that the only grass the development has is a small strip in the backyards. She believed that the look and feel of the development would need to be more suitable to fit in with the area, such as wood windows and doors. She commented that a little roof with pillars does not create a front porch. She stated that she could support a townhome development on the parcel but would want additional greenspace, a design that better fits with Uptown Hamel, and actual front porches. Cavanaugh commented that he owns a property three doors down from this development and asked if the City Attorney would see a conflict of interest. Anderson commented that he did not see a legal conflict of interest. Medina City Council Excerpt from 12/7/2021 Minutes 2 Cavanaugh commented that he would be okay with a townhome concept but would agree that the storefront would need to be reworked to fit within Uptown Hamel. He commented that the density is something that will help the rest of Uptown Hamel develop. He stated that if the intent is to bring in business, this type of development would provide users for businesses. Martin confirmed the consensus of the Council to proceed in a review of a townhome concept. She referenced the building setbacks and noted that this development would propose a front setback of five feet and side setback of eight feet. She asked if those would be acceptable with City Code. Sparks confirmed that those setbacks would comply. Martin commented that the developer proposes 30 units, and the density range would allow between 9 and 32 units. She commented that even though the density in on the high end, it is within that range. She commented that the largest concern seems to be with the architectural design. Reid commented that the building looks too modern, and the windows and doors look very modern. She stated that the shape of the building is fine, but more effort would need to be made for the development to fit within Uptown Hamel. She agreed that the more developed designs could be on the street facing units. She noted that she would want to see an actual front porch as well. Martin commented that the Council would like to see enhancements on the street facing units, along with views that would be exposed to other outward facing units. She stated that porches adjacent to Hamel Road are preferred. She asked if it would make sense to include more open space in the interior for a playground, gathering space, or common amenities. She commented on neighborhoods where front porches have been incorporated and are successful. She believed that the design should follow a modern farm or turn of the century look, which would provide a feeling of age that is missing from this development. She commented that this seems to fall under the category of 1980s development, which does not fit well with Uptown Hamel. Albers stated that when he thinks of what Uptown Hamel might look and feel like, he would think of the row homes proposed for Weston Woods. He stated that those homes had a lot of character in the front. He stated that perhaps the developer could use that as a model to provide the unique character feel the City is attempting to create for Uptown Hamel. Cavanaugh commented that if he were to think of Uptown Hamel, his suggestion would be to look at rowhomes in Saint Louis Park next to Home Depot. He believed that this development could help to set the tone for the development in the area. Martin commented that the west elevation would be quite visible from Hamel Road as it is adjacent to the wetland and therefore that side should also be given consideration. She asked if street parking would be available at this location. Sparks commented that street parking would be available during some times of the year but not during others. Scherer commented that staff discussed that as well, noting that perhaps there is a joint venture between the City and developer to widen that area to create on-street parking. Medina City Council Excerpt from 12/7/2021 Minutes 3 Martin commented that perhaps the developer could explore how on street parking could be accommodated in conjunction with City staff. She stated that there are a few issues mentioned in the staff report related to the drive lane configuration, which should also be discussed with City staff. She commented that she would like to see additional greenspace in the interior or along the perimeter. She stated that she would also like to see interesting landscaping along Hamel Road and landscaping along the east and west elevations. Reid commented that perhaps the vertical siding is an “old time” color it would better fit within Uptown Hamel. Martin summarized the comments of the Council to enhance the elevations visible to the public with particular focus on the Hamel Road elevation, enhance greenspace and improve landscaping along the elevations, and addressing the comments of City staff from the report. Cavanaugh asked if the developer considered a mixed use to have commercial or office along Hamel Road with residential above or behind. Reid commented that she believes that this proposal is a long way from feeling like it belongs in Uptown Hamel. Josh Sanderson, developer, commented that they believe they are building something that would fit within Uptown Hamel and agreed that the Hamel Road units would have better front porches. He stated that they see the Uptown Hamel area as having three different zones, the industrial/warehouse, residential, and commercial/retail. He stated that adding 30 townhomes would provide more opportunities for families to live and support the local businesses in the area. He displayed an updated front porch sketch. Martin commented that looks a lot more like what she would envision. Reid also agreed that this concept would work better and is a good example of the direction this should go. Cavanaugh agreed that would be a good start. Sanderson commented that while there is not a lot of greenspace on this site, there is five acres of greenspace adjacent to the site and the site is in close proximity to Hamel Legion Park. DesLauriers rejoined the Council. K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-22 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2022-04-01 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx 7 0 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | S U I T E 3 0 0 | M I N N E A P O L I S , M N | 5 5 4 1 6 | 7 6 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | W S B E N G . C O M April 1, 2022 Mr. Dusty Finke City Planning Director City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: Hamel Townhome Project Preliminary Plat & Plan Submittal – Engineering Plan Review City Project No. LR-22-314 WSB Project No. 019125-000 Dear Mr. Finke: WSB staff have reviewed the Hamel Townhomes Development Preliminary Plat and Civil Plans submittal dated March 22, 2022. The applicant proposes to construct 30 rental townhomes on a 2.15 acre parcel located in the Uptown Hamel area in the City of Medina. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina’s general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. General & Preliminary Plat 1. The plan provides sidewalks and other pedestrian amenities within the site. See the City Planners comments on pedestrian access and mobility requirements. 2. With future submittals provide an existing conditions/removal plan, grading plan, construction details, and erosion/sediment control plans. Provide a SWPPP with final construction plans. Complete. 3. Additional drainage and utility easements will be required for the underground stormwater treatment area and the subsurface drainage area under the pet park area. In-progress, the applicant has now shown the entire outlot to be drainage and utility easement; a final review will be made with final construction plans. 4. The width of the drainage and utility easement for the water/sewer utilities should be wide enough to allow for 10’ beyond both the water and sewer main locations. In-progress, the applicant has now shown the entire outlot to be drainage and utility easement; a final review will be made with final construction plans. 5. Add a 5’ drainage and utility easement for the common draintile system adjacent to the Hamel Road right of way. In-progress, review by City staff will be conducted under separated cover. 6. Stairs from the building(s) should not be located within City right of way on Hamel Road. Complete. 7. Provide a clear phasing plan for construction. The City is concerned about protecting the underground stormwater treatment area with the compact site and the potential to have multiple contractors and/or operations occurring simultaneously. City of Medina – Hamel Townhome Development Preliminary Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review April 1, 2022 Page 2 K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-22 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2022-04-01 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx 8. City code has requirements for setback distances for cut/fill slopes including what would be created with retaining walls, see section 828.28 Subpt.13 (excerpt below). Refer to the full ordinance and requirements. The code requires that the minimum setback is 2’; this should include related geogrid reinforcement, drainage aggregate, and draintile, or other improvements associated with the wall construction. The cut slope requirements have been met at the southeasterly retaining wall but the fill slopes requirements have not at the northerly retaining wall. 9. In general, the City does not typically allow retaining walls within drainage and utility easements. Consider ways in which the proposed walls can be relocated out of these easements or eliminate altogether. In-progress, easements have been revised; a final review will be made with final construction plans. 10. Construction of the proposed improvements should not encroach onto adjacent properties without their express written consent. If disturbances on adjacent properties are proposed, provide written consent to the City. See areas on the east side where the proposed 8’ deep storm sewer is greater than the distance to the property line (2-5’). This will likely lead to impacts to the neighboring property and specifically the trees. 11. Additional comments were provided directly on the plan sheets. All comments from the plan sheets may not be included with the review letter. Removals Plan (C1.0) 12. Show removals associated with the utility abandonment and connections within Hamel Road, including the new sanitary sewer extension to the west. 13. Note what is proposed for removal/abandonment of existing water/sewer services. Show all existing sewer and water services, see utility asbuilts. City of Medina – Hamel Townhome Development Preliminary Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review April 1, 2022 Page 3 K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-22 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2022-04-01 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx 14. Show location of existing storm sewer line adjacent to the northerly property line; the location may affect the proposed location of the storm sewer outlet, see utility asbuilts. Site Plan & Turning Movements (C2.0, C2.1) 15. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building structures and required turn around space as required by the Fire Marshall. Provided, awaiting response from Fire Marshall. 16. The City may consider widening Hamel Road in the future to provide additional on-street parking. With that in mind, provide site grading and building elevations that accommodate the future relocation of sidewalk facilities up to or closer to the property line (within City right-of-way). The City may wish to consider the widening of Hamel Road for the purposes of adding off-street parking be constructed with the project. The work should include the sidewalk relocation with a 6’ minimum boulevard to back of curb. In-progress, the applicant is showing the sidewalk and boulevard on the plans to be constructed by others, not with the project. Additional comments will be provided pertaining to cost-sharing agreements under separate cover so that these improvements are constructed with the project. 17. Hatch and/or note proposed paving area within Hamel Road where it is shown to be widened for the parking lane. Also show dimensioning labels for boulevard and widened turn lane. 18. Provide the surface type for the transition area shown between the trail and the sidewalk. 19. Identify areas where ‘tipout’ curb is used throughout the site. Grading Plan (C3.0) 20. Provide a grading plan with future submittals. Include drainage arrows on the grading plan showing the direction of flow and slope percentages. A portion of the site will impact the existing ponding location to the west, expand the pond to the greatest extent possible at the northeast corner of the adjacent pond. With final plans include flow arrows and slope percentages along curb lines, across sheet flow areas, and along swales. 21. Provide EOF locations for all low points inside and outside the roadway. 22. Maintain all surface grades within the minimum of 2% and maximum of 33% slopes. Vegetated swale grades shall be 2.0% or more. A swale will be required along the easterly and northerly property lines. With final plat submittal, provide more drainage arrows and grade percentages for curb lines and paved areas. 23. Show retaining wall locations and provide construction details. Retaining wall locations were shown on plan. Please provide typical section/details with final plat submittal. The retaining wall on along the easterly property line is on the down gradient of the slope from the east, runoff will likely be directed over the wall. The final wall design should consider this issue and ways to mitigate it. 24. Show storm sewer structure numbers on the grading plan. 25. Note the high point elevations at the access drive where the grade splits between the site and the City ROW. Most of the City ROW should drain to Hamel Road, locate the high point as close to the ROW as possible. Complete. City of Medina – Hamel Townhome Development Preliminary Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review April 1, 2022 Page 4 K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-22 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2022-04-01 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx 26. Based on the existing profile grade of Hamel Road, it does not appear that a valley gutter or concrete apron is necessary. Also, within the site, confirm that the valley gutters are needed; it appears the long north/south valley gutter is being placed where the surface grade is proposed to be at least 2.0%. Complete, with plan updates and flatter grades applicant is showing installation of valley gutter. 27. The width of the proposed swale along the easterly property line is relatively narrow, especially adjacent to the proposed retaining wall. Along the bottom of the swale, create a “French Drain” with amended soil to the surface and perforated PVC. 28. Add a legend/detail for grading elevations and symbols (LF, G, GR, TB, etc.). Confirm elevations are correct at the southwest group. Complete. 29. Provide fencing for the retaining wall in the southeast corner. 30. The low point in the new curb line in Hamel Road east of the entrance does not drain. 31. The proposed grading along the easterly property line is shown right up to the property line. This does not leave space for silt fence or a buffer for construction. Move the grading in and consider the space needed to install silt fence without disturbing the adjacent property. Utility Plan (C4.0) General 32. Any public sanitary sewer and watermain shall be encompassed by drainage and utility easements where located outside of public road right of way. Drainage and utility easements will need to allow for a 1:1 trench from the invert of the utility with a minimum of 20’ centered on the utility. Easements should be provided for both water and sewer. Show proposed easements on final utility plan. 33. For all existing public utilities, label the pipe size, pipe material, and proposed percent grade for gravity mains. Complete. 34. Abandon the existing watermain and sewer services up to the right of way at Hamel Road. Unless there will be disturbance within Hamel Road for other improvements, the City does not want to disturb the roadway pavement just for the service abandonment. 35. On the final construction plans add the following notes: o The City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred associated with variations in the utility asbuilt plans, elevations, or locations. o Watermain shall have a minimum of 7.5’ of cover. o The City will require televising for sanitary sewer pipe installations prior to accepting a warranty for the utility systems; provide report and video files to the City for review. Watermain 36. Watermain looping connections will be needed to minimize long dead-end watermain sections; the proposed site accommodates watermain looping. City of Medina – Hamel Townhome Development Preliminary Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review April 1, 2022 Page 5 K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-22 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2022-04-01 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx Consideration of further watermain looping needs and stubs for future phases or other adjacent developments will be required and reviewed with future submittals. The City will not require additional watermain stubs for future extension. The City Fire Marshall will need to review the proposed watermain sizing of 6”. 37. Hydrant locations shall be approved of by the Fire Marshal; typically, a maximum of 250’ influence radius (approximately 400’ spacing) is required to serve the immediate residential areas. Show proposed hydrant locations on the utility plan and provide an exhibit showing hydrant influence spacing. 38. Where any sewer pipe (storm or sanitary) crosses the watermain, include a note saying “Maintain 18-Inch Separation, 4” Rigid Insulation”. Also, provide horizontal dimension notes in various locations between the watermain and storm/sanitary sewer. Note location of insulation where storms sewer crosses watermain on public road (shared access). 39. The watermain connections to the building(s) shall be reviewed and approved by the City Fire Marshall. With future submittals show proposed water service and sanitary sewer service locations on the plans; the City requires a minimum depth of 4’ from low floor elevations for sanitary sewer services. A separate water/sewer service will be required for each townhome unit. A separate valve/shut-off will be required for each water service. 40. There appears to be a missing water service location to the most southeasterly set of townhomes. Complete. 41. Connect into the existing 6” watermain stub from Hamel, see record plans for location. Complete. 42. Provide hydrants at each dead end of the main, which also appears to correlate with the highest points of the watermain loop to the south. 43. Clarify which label describes the water services to the units (1/2” copper; 6” combined DIP). Individual units should have a minimum 1” service. 44. Call out all watermain fittings/bends. 45. Show the full impact area of connecting to the watermain stub at the point shown. Sanitary Sewer 46. The applicant is proposing a lift station for the sanitary sewer system. Generally, the City does not allow a lift station if there are other options to convey sewage through gravity means. Consider a gravity connection to the southwest of the site, through Rainwater Park and into Hamel Road. Reference the City’s record plan for the sanitary sewer depths on Hamel Rd (enclosed). Complete. 47. The City’s typical standard is to place sewer a minimum of 10’ below the surface (18” vertical separation below the watermain). Where this depth is not feasible, the City will allow an 8’ depth; depths less than 8’ will require review on a case-by-case basis. Show rim/invert information for all sanitary manholes. Complete. Three manholes are proposed with depths less than 8’, MH 4, 4A, and 4B. Since a forcemain system is being proposed for the majority of the units (and is approved by the City, see previous comments), the City’s preference is to connect the remaining sewer to this system to achieve standard manhole depth. Complete. City of Medina – Hamel Townhome Development Preliminary Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review April 1, 2022 Page 6 K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-22 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2022-04-01 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx 48. With final construction plans, if basements are proposed with the townhomes, the City will require draintile or other connections for sump pump discharges. A separate foundation pipe system in addition to the sump discharge system should be considered. 49. A wet-tap connection typically includes a valve, show this valve location at the wet-tap. With that in mind, the first valve location shown within the site will not be needed. There are a number of valves shown on the plan. From the City’s perspective, a valve will be needed on each side of the tee from the street, and one more at the north end. Complete. 50. Provide a sewer stub into the northeast green space for future connections. 51. Show all existing utilities and impacts connecting to the existing sanitary sewer at the intersection with Hunter Drive. o Show proposed pipe, structures, and connections as black. o Show existing sanitary sewer, storm sewer, potable water lines, raw water lines, etc. as screened or greyed-out. o Note that there are both potable and raw watermains in the intersection. o Provide all crossing information. Storm Sewer 52. Provide additional structure information for proposed roof drain collection system, such as rim and invert elevations. 53. Pipe angles within manholes shall not be less than 90 degrees, revised the draintile “bend” location at the northeasterly portion of the property. 54. Add additional roof drain common collection systems for the remaining townhome units along the easterly property line at minimum; consider connecting all of the townhomes to a common collection system. Along the easterly swale include additional “Nyoplast” structures similar to what is shown for the townhomes along Hamel Road. 55. With the addition of the downspout drainage and the structures to the draintile along the easterly property line, confirm what pipe size is adequate to convey stormwater. 56. CB 5 and CB 6 should be shown as CBMH’s with 48” structures with 15” and 18” inlet and outlet pipes respectively. Civil Details (C5.0 – C5.3) 57. Add typical street section(s) details to the plans meeting the City’s standard, at minimum. The final pavement section shall be designed by a registered geotechnical engineer for the specific soil conditions found on the site. Typical sections were provided, provide the geotechnical report with pavement recommendations. 58. Use City standard details where applicable. A final review will be provided with final plan submittal. SWPPP (SW 1.0 – SW 1.5) 59. An NPDES permit will be required for this project, a copy of the permit will be required prior to the issuance of City permits. City of Medina – Hamel Townhome Development Preliminary Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review April 1, 2022 Page 7 K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-22 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2022-04-01 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx 60. A SWPPP and erosion/sediment control plans were provided with the plan set. A full detailed review of the erosion/sediment control plan and SWPPP sheets will be completed with the final plat submittal. Traffic & Access 61. Based on the proposed site plan the anticipated traffic generation would be 512 daily trips, 32 AM peak hour trips and 39 PM peak hour trips, assuming 78 townhomes on the site. 62. Provide a figure showing truck movements throughout the site including the largest truck and the largest fire truck. Design driveways and circulation routes to accommodate these vehicles. Provided, awaiting response from Fire Marshall. Stormwater Management 63. The applicant will need to submit a Stormwater Management Plan and modeling consistent with Medina’s Stormwater Design Manual. 64. The development will need to meet the City’s volume control requirement to capture and retain onsite 1.1” of runoff from the net new impervious surface. By satisfying the volume requirement the water quality requirement is considered met. Follow the City’s Stormwater Design Manual for alternative credits towards the volume requirement if infiltration is not feasible. o Volume control for this site is provided by the adjacent pond constructed by the city. The pond was designed to handle and treat up to 50% impervious cover. Any additional impervious over 50% will need to be treated on site. o Filtration receives 50% credit for stormwater treatment. If filtration is being used 2.2” of runoff should be used in calculations to assure adequate treatment. o Complete, proposed underground filtration meets the additional 32% impervious requirement. Volume control is met using both the regional pond (30%) and the infiltration basin (52%). Provide additional plans for underground treatment system that includes a detailed plan view and location of cleanouts or other access locations. 65. The development will need to meet the City’s rate control requirement, which states that post development discharge rates must be less than or equal to existing conditions discharge rates. o Complete, rates for all modeled storm events meet the requirement. 66. Water quality standards must be met. Provided MIDS print out show that the site in meeting City and Elm Creek standards. 67. Provide storm sewer sizing calculations and rational for verification with future submittals. Refer to the city design guidelines for pipe sizing and flow requirements. o Confirm that proposed CB’s have adequate capacity to handle the runoff from the impervious surfaces. There is a lot of drainage that is being conveyed from the south to the north. o Consider additional “on-grade” catch basins to collect runoff before the low point. City of Medina – Hamel Townhome Development Preliminary Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review April 1, 2022 Page 8 K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-22 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2022-04-01 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx o Confirm inlet capacity for roof drain collection system along the easterly property line. It appears stormwater model assumes this is being collected and conveyed to treatment area. 68. Include surface Inlet CB 6 as a sump to provide pretreatment of parking lot runoff before discharging into the underground system. 69. The City requires two feet of freeboard from structure low openings to 100-year high water levels and EOF’s. o HWL for the underground filtration system is 998.72. Provide EOF route and elevation to confirm freeboard. The route of the EOF appears to be o Provide HWL for adjacent stormwater pond to show freeboard is met for proposed structure. 70. The City requires two feet of freeboard from structure low openings. The LO of the building in the northwest corner (1002.0) is not two feet higher than the adjacent EOF (1001.0). In areas where this separation is not or cannot be provided, additional analysis is required to show that the 100-year back-to back storm event does not affect adjacent structures. 71. Include maintenance access route and provide long term Operation and Maintenance schedule for the underground facility. 72. The development will need to meet the appropriate watershed standards for Elm Creek Water Management Commission and the applicant shall submit for the required permits. Wetlands 73. There do not appear to be any wetlands present within the project parcel. 74. There is a pond located on the parcel to the west, but buffers are not required for wetlands outside of the subject property. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards. We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet. Sincerely, WSB Jim Stremel, P.E. City Engineer HIGHWAY 55 ")55 ")24 ")19 ")101 ")116 ")11 ")24 ")19 £¤12 H A M E L R D M E D I N A R D PIONEER TRL TAMARACK DR WILLOW DR HACKAMORE RD ARROWHEAD DR H O M E S T E A D T R L CHIPPEWA RD HUNTER DR PARKVIEW DR BROCKTON LN N MEANDER RD EVERGREEN RD BROCKTON LN N CHIPPEWA RD WILLOW DR WILLOW DR HUNTER DR ")55 Medina Golf & Country Club YMCA - Camp Ihduhapi Spring Hill Golf Club Baker Park Reserve Baker Park Reserve Wolsfeld Woods (SNA) Lake Independence Regional Trail North-South 1 Regional Trail Search Corridor L a k e S a r a h R e g i o n a l T r a i l S e a r c h C o r r i d o r Lake Sarah Regional Trail Search Corridor Katrina Independence School Mooney Spurzem Holy Name Peter Wolsfeld Half Moon Krieg Miller Thies Ardmore Map Date: October 2, 2018 Scale: 1:32,000[0 0.5 10.25 Mile Map 6-1Park and Trail Plan Location of proposed trail segments are intended to identify connections and cooridors, not exact locations. Legend Trails Existing Paved Trail Existing Shoulder Trail Existing Turf Trail Existing Sidewalk Proposed Paved Trail Proposed Shoulder Trail Proposed Turf Trail Future Park Search Area Parks Existing Park Potential Park Expansion Regional Corridors Regional Trail Search Corridor Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL .. .. .. 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/22/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C0.0 TITLE SHEET .. .. .. .. .. .. HAMEL TOWNHOMES MEDINA, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER SITE LOCATION MAP N ISSUED FOR: CITY SUBMITTAL DEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER: HAMEL TOWNHOMES, LLC 1850 W WAYZATA BLVD LONG LAKE, MN 55356 CONTACT. OWNER: GRANT TJERNAGEL EMAIL: GRANT@PRO-COMMERCIAL.COM DIRECT: 515-597-4700 ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: CIVIL SITE GROUP 5000 GLENWOOD AVE GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 CONTACT. ENGINEER: MATT PAVEK, PE EMAIL: MPAVEK@CIVILSITEGROUP.COM OFFICE : 612-615-0060 LANDSCAPE ARCH.: ROBERT BINDER, PLA EMAIL: RBINDER@CIVILSITEGROUP.COM OFFICE : 612-615-0060 SURVEYOR: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: Know what's below. before you dig.Call R ARCHITECT: COLLINS/WEBB 307B SW MARKT ST LEE'S SUMMIT, MISSOURI 64063 CONTACT. ARCHITECT: JASON PECSI, AIA EMAIL: JPECSI@COLLINSANDWEBB.COM DIRECT: 816-249-2278 CIVIL SITE GROUP 4931 W 35TH STREET SUITE 200 ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CONTACT. SURVEYOR: RORY SYNSTELIEN, LS EMAIL: RORY@CIVILSITEGROUP.COM OFFICE: 612-615-0060 ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES 2825 CEDAR AVE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407 CONTACT. ENGINEER: PAUL GIONFRIDDO, PE EMAIL: PGIONFRIDDO@HAUGOGTS.COM OFFICE: 612-271-8185 SITE LOCATION SHEET TITLE C0.0 TITLE SHEET SITE SURVEYV1.0 UTILITY PLANC4.0 SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0 GRADING PLANC3.0 C5.0 C5.1 L1.0 CIVIL DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1 SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.2 C2.0 SITE PLAN SWPPP - NARRATIVESW1.3 CIVIL DETAILS C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN C5.2 CIVIL DETAILS SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.4 SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.5 L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES & DETAILS C2.1 VEHICLE TURNING DIAGRAM UTILITY PLAN OFF SITEC4.1 CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF EOF REMOVE EXISTING TREE AND ROOT BALL, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING TREE AND ROOT BALL, IN R.O.W. COORDINATE WITH CITY FOR ALL WORK IN R.O.W. REMOVE EXISTING TREE AND ROOT BALL, TYP. SAWCUT & REMOVE REMOVE EXISTING PVMT. SEE SITE PLAN FOR NEW PROPOSED PVMT. EDGE/LAYOUT (FUTURE BY OTHERS) REMOVE & SALVAGE CONC. PAVERS. STOCKPILE FOR REINSTALLATION, SEE SITE PLAN FOR NEW LAYOUT PROTECT EXIST. UTILITIES TO REMAIN, TYP. REMOVE & SALVAGE CONC. PAVERS. STOCKPILE FOR REINSTALLATION, SEE SITE PLAN FOR NEW LAYOUT REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER, (FUTURE, BY OTHERS) REMOVE ALL PVMTS., INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL, TYP. REMOVE ALL WALLS, STEPS, TIMBERS & CURBS, INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL & FOOTINGS, TYP. REMOVE ALL BUILDING STRUCTURES, INCLUDING ALL FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS & ALL UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES. REMOVE ALL ADJACENT AND ATTACHED STRUCTURES (DECKS, PORCHES). REMOVE ALL PVMTS., INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL, TYP. REMOVE ALL WALLS, STEPS, TIMBERS & CURBS, INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL & FOOTINGS, TYP. REMOVE ALL PVMTS., INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL, TYP. REMOVE ALL WALLS, TIMBERS & CURBS, INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL & FOOTINGS, TYP. REMOVE ALL PVMTS., INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING TREES, SHRUBS, UNDERBRUSH & DEBRIS, INCLUDING ALL AND ROOT BALLS & UNDERGROUND PLANT STRUCTURE, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING WATER AND SEWER SERVICES IN PROPERTY LINE CAP AND ABANDON SERVICES IN ROW REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER (P.O.B.) A Point 552.5 feet NW'ly of the SW Corner of Lot 16 ("Point A") Li n e P a r a l l e l w i t h NW ' l y L i n e o f L o t 1 6 S'ly Right-of-Way Line of Soo Line Railroad Point of Beginning Li n e P a r a l l e l w i t h NW ' l y L i n e o f L o t 1 6 pe r f o u n d m o n u m e n t a t i o n HAMEL ROAD S73°12'09"E 290.00 S1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 8 " W 3 1 7 . 3 4 N74°53'27"W 290.00 N1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 6 " E 3 2 5 . 8 9 2 Story H o u s e 342 Ham e l R d Founda t i o n A r e a = 1,899 S . F . Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " R C P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) (A Public R/W) Access PID: 12 1 1 8 2 3 4 2 0 0 1 5 PID: 12 1 1 8 2 3 4 2 0 0 1 6 Address U n a s s i g n e D [A] Sidewalk crosses property line. (LOCAL/MINOR COLLECTOR, PER CITY OF MEDINA) REMOVALS LEGEND: TREE PROTECTION REMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL, INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS. REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALL FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS. TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL .. .. .. 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/22/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN .. .. .. .. .. .. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF IN RIGHT-OF-WAY, COORDINATE WITH LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT. REMOVAL NOTES: 1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 3.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 4.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 5.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS. 6.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 7.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS. 8.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. 9.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 10.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. 11.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 12.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 13.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 14.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 15.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 16.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 17.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 18.ALL EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC/REGULATORY SIGNAGE TO BE INVENTORIED AND IF REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETURNED TO LGU. 19.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CITY OF MEDINA REMOVAL NOTES: 1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: DL TREE PROTECTION N T S 25' DRIPLINE WIDTH FURNISH A AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIP LINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SHOWN ON PLAN, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. WHERE POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25' BEYOND DRIP LINE. PLACE TREE PROTECTION SIGN ON POSTS, ONE PER INDIVIDUAL TREE (FACING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY), OR ONE EVERY 100' LF ALONG A GROVE OR MULTI-TREE PROTECTION AREA. POSTS AND FENCING EXTEND FENCE 25' BEYOND DRIPLINE WHERE POSSIBLE TREE PROTECTION SIGN, TYP. TREE DRIPLINE, OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 1 19.0'24.0' 24.0'19.0'51.0' 51.0' 14 . 5 ' 37 . 0 ' 15 . 2 ' 37 . 0 ' 15 . 2 ' 2.0' 37.0'15.2'24.0'37.0'15.2'37.0' 2.0' 24.0' 37 . 0 ' R6.0 ' R 6 . 0 ' R6.0 ' R 6 . 0 ' R6. 0 ' R 6 . 0 ' R5. 0 ' R6.0 ' R 6 . 0 ' 20 8 . 9 ' 15 6 . 9 ' 20 8 . 9 ' 104.9' 104.9' 51 . 0 ' 30 . 0 ' 3. 5 ' R 6 . 0 ' R6.0 ' R6.0 ' R 6 . 0 ' 2. 0 ' 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K 6.2'51.0' 9.3' 34 . 0 ' 14:45 Request c o n t r o l 30 . 0 ' 37.0'19.7'19.0' R5.0 ' R 1 2 . 0 ' R 5 . 0 ' R12 . 0 ' 37 . 3 ' 11 . 5 ' 5. 4 ' GANG MAILBOX 12'X12' GAZEBO STRUCTURE, INSTALL PER MANUF. 6' HEIGHT PVC PRIVACY FENCING 25 . 0 ' 12.8' 20 . 0 ' 12.8' 8.7'4. 8 ' 4. 8 ' 24.5' 12.8' CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON PER CITY STANDARDS, TYP. BIT. PVMT., TYP PROPOSED 4 UNIT BUILDING BIT. PVMT., TYP PROPOSED 4 UNIT BUILDING PR O P O S E D 8 U N I T B U I L D I N G PR O P O S E D 8 U N I T B U I L D I N G PR O P O S E D 6 U N I T B U I L D I N G SNOW STORAGE 8 CONCRETE SIDEWALK PVMT.STRIPING, TYP. BIT. PVMT., TYP MATCH EXIST. CURB PER CITY STANDARD MATCH EXIST. CURB PER CITY STANDARD ZONING: (CH-RR) COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY RAILROAD ZONING: (UR) URBAN RESIDENTIAL B612 C&G B612 C&G B612 C&G B612 C&G SNOW STORAGE SNOW STORAGE SNOW STORAGE R6 . 0 ' R 6 . 0 ' R6 . 0 ' R 6 . 0 ' 19.0' GRAVEL PATH 22 . 0 ' PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK R3.0 'R7.6 ' R3.0' R1 2 . 0 ' R 1 2 . 0 ' R3.0 'R 7 . 6 ' R 3 . 0 ' CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT 22 . 0 ' 22 . 0 ' VALLEY GUTTER 5. 8 ' R 1 6 . 0 ' R3.0 ' R16 . 0 ' R 1 6 . 0 ' R20 . 0 ' R 3 . 0 ' 10.0' 2. 0 ' 5.4' 5.7' 24.0'11.8'C.I.P. CONC STEPS & PAVER WALK, SEE GRADING PLAN, TYP. THICKENED EDGE PATIO 15 . 2 ' SEG. RET. WALL STEPS, PER MANUF. DESIGN & LAYOUT SEG. RET. WALL. STEP T.O.W. DOWN WITH STEP LAYOUT, MIN 12" ABOVE ADJ. ADJACENT STEP SEG. RET. WALL. MAINTAIN CONSTANT T.O.W. ELEV. ON THIS SIDE OF STEPS 12.8' 1. 0 ' 5. 0 ' VALLEY GUTTER 18 . 0 ' 18 . 0 ' 2. 0 ' 2. 0 ' 3.0' 3.0' 3.6' 3.4' 1. 0 ' 5. 0 ' THICKENED EDGE PATIO THICKENED EDGE PATIO THICKENED EDGE PATIO THICKENED EDGE PATIO THICKENED EDGE PATIO PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED CURB (FUTURE, BY OTHERS)PROPOSED CURB (FUTURE, BY OTHERS) EOF EOF HAMEL ROAD Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 12" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " R C P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bit u m i n o u s T r a i l (A Public R/W) POND (LOCAL/MINOR COLLECTOR, PER CITY OF MEDINA) Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL .. .. .. 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/22/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C2.0 SITE PLAN .. .. .. .. .. .. SITE AREA TABLE: 1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS. 6.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 7.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. 9.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL. 10.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. 11.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL. 12.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 14.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS. 15.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 16.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP. 17.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 18.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS. 19.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SITE LAYOUT NOTES: SITE PLAN LEGEND: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED. HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGN NP = NO PARKING FIRE LANE ST = STOP CP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY Know what's below. before you dig.Call R CONCRETE PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEE DETAIL. PROPERTY LINE CURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUT GUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLAN LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE). SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL. HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE). SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TO PERVIOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) - CONCRETE PAVER PERVIOUS SYSTEM. INCLUDE ALL BASE MATERIAL AND APPURTENANCES AS SPECIFIED PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS. MAKE: BELGARD, OR EQUIVILANT MODEL: AQUASTONE, OR EQUIVILANT COLOR: T.B.D. - PROVIDE SAMPLES, SHOP DRAWINGS & PRODUCT DATA REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SPECIALTY PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) - PROVIDE BID FOR THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS, INCLUDE VARIATIONS OF BASE MATERIAL AND OTHER NECESSARY COMPONENTS. 1. STAMPED & COLORED CONCRETE 2. CONCRETE PAVERS MAKERS, COLORS, MODELS, & PATTERN TO BE INCLUDED IN SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. OPERATIONAL NOTES: TRASH: TRASH RECEPTACLES IN GARAGE CITY OF MEDINA SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES. ACCESSIBILITY ARROW (IF APPLICABLE) DO NOT PAINT. 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N ZONING NOTES: 1.CURRENT ZONING: UPTOWN HAMEL (UH) 2.PROPOSED ZONING: UPTOWN HAMEL (UH) 3.THE GROSS LAND AREA IS 93,259 +/- SQUARE FEET OR 2.14 +/- ACRES. 4.DENSITY: AT LEAST 10 RESIDENTIAL UNITS PER NET ACRE. PROPOSED UNITS = 30 5.SETBACKS: FRONT YARD: 0 FT SIDE YARD: 8 FT REAR YARD: 20 FT 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K GA R A G E GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KIT C H E N BA T H DI N I N G LIV I N G KIT C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KIT C H E N BA T H 36' - 11" GA R A G E GA R A G E DI N I N G LIV I N G KIT C H E N BA T H DI N I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LIV I N G KIT C H E N BA T H 15 6 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " GARAGE GARAGE DINING LIVING KITCHEN BATH DININGLIVING KITCHEN BATH GARAGEGARAGE DININGLIVING KITCHEN BATH DINING LIVING KITCHEN BATH 104' - 11" GARAGEGARAGE DININGLIVING KITCHEN BATH DINING LIVING KITCHEN BATH GARAGE GARAGE DINING LIVING KITCHEN BATH DININGLIVING KITCHEN BATH GA R A G E GA R A G E DIN I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H DIN I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DIN I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DIN I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E GA R A G E DIN I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H DIN I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DIN I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DIN I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E GA R A G E DIN I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H DI N I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DIN I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E GA R A G E DI N I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H DIN I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H 20 8 ' - 1 0 5 / 8 " CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF EOF HAMEL ROAD Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" WM SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l Railroad Tracks (A Public R/W) Access POND [A] Sidewalk crosses property line. (LOCAL/MINOR COLLECTOR, PER CITY OF MEDINA) 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K GA R A G E GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H DIN I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KIT C H E N BA T H 36' - 11" GA R A G E GA R A G E DIN I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H DI N I N G LI V I N G KIT C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DIN I N G LI V I N G KIT C H E N BA T H 15 6 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " GARAGE GARAGE DINING LIVING KITCHEN BATH DININGLIVING KITCHEN BATH GARAGEGARAGE DININGLIVING KITCHEN BATH DINING LIVING KITCHEN BATH 104' - 11" GARAGEGARAGE DININGLIVING KITCHEN BATH DINING LIVING KITCHEN BATH GARAGE GARAGE DINING LIVING KITCHEN BATH DININGLIVING KITCHEN BATH GA R A G E GA R A G E DIN I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H DI N I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DIN I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H DIN I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H DIN I N G LIV I N G KIT C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KIT C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E GA R A G E DI N I N G LIV I N G KIT C H E N BA T H DI N I N G LI V I N G KIT C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H 20 8 ' - 1 0 5 / 8 " CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF EOF HAMEL ROAD Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" WM SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l Railroad Tracks (A Public R/W) Access POND [A] Sidewalk crosses property line. (LOCAL/MINOR COLLECTOR, PER CITY OF MEDINA) 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K GA R A G E GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H DIN I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KIT C H E N BA T H 36' - 11" GA R A G E GA R A G E DIN I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H DI N I N G LI V I N G KIT C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DIN I N G LI V I N G KIT C H E N BA T H 15 6 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " GARAGE GARAGE DINING LIVING KITCHEN BATH DININGLIVING KITCHEN BATH GARAGEGARAGE DININGLIVING KITCHEN BATH DINING LIVING KITCHEN BATH 104' - 11" GARAGEGARAGE DININGLIVING KITCHEN BATH DINING LIVING KITCHEN BATH GARAGE GARAGE DINING LIVING KITCHEN BATH DININGLIVING KITCHEN BATH GA R A G E GA R A G E DIN I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H DI N I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DIN I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H DIN I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H DIN I N G LIV I N G KIT C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KIT C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E GA R A G E DI N I N G LIV I N G KIT C H E N BA T H DI N I N G LI V I N G KIT C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LIV I N G KI T C H E N BA T H GA R A G E DI N I N G LI V I N G KI T C H E N BA T H 20 8 ' - 1 0 5 / 8 " CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF EOF HAMEL ROAD Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" WM SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l Railroad Tracks (A Public R/W) Access POND [A] Sidewalk crosses property line. (LOCAL/MINOR COLLECTOR, PER CITY OF MEDINA) Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL .. .. .. 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/22/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C2.1 VEHICLE TURNING DIAGRAM .. .. .. .. .. .. 0 1" = 50'-0" 50'-0"25'-0" N MOVING TRUCK FIRE TRUCK GARBAGE TRUCK 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K 36' - 11" 15 6 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 104' - 11" CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF EOF HAMEL ROAD S73°12'09"E 290.00 S1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 8 " W 3 1 7 . 3 4 N74°53'27"W 290.00 N1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 6 " E 3 2 5 . 8 9 Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " R C P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bit u m i n o u s T r a i l (A Public R/W) Access POND PID: 12 1 1 8 2 3 4 2 0 0 1 5 PID: 12 1 1 8 2 3 4 2 0 0 1 6 Address U n a s s i g n e D [A] Sidewalk crosses property line. (LOCAL/MINOR COLLECTOR, PER CITY OF MEDINA) Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL .. .. .. 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/22/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C3.0 GRADING PLAN .. .. .. .. .. .. 1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 4.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 5.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 6.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:1 9.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES. 11.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE. 12.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. 13.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK. 14.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10' OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS. 15. TOLERANCES 15.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 15.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 15.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. 15.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. 16.MAINTENANCE 16.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS. 16.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED. 16.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION. GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL GRADING PLAN LEGEND: SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTER SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRS GROUNDWATER INFORMATION: CITY OF MEDINA GRADING NOTES: 1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES. SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: Know what's below. before you dig.Call R EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT) EMERGENCY OVERFLOW EOF=1135.52 TO PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY XXXXX, INC., DATED XX-XX-XX GROUNDWATER WAS OBSERVED AT ELEVATIONS RANGING FROM XXX.XX TO XXX.XX THE BORINGS & GROUNDWATER ARE AS FOLLOWS: SB-1 XXX.XX SB-2 XXX.XX SB-3 XXX.XX SB-4 XXX.XX PROPOSED FOOTING DRAIN TILE INVERT ELEVATION = XXX.XX SPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTING GRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N LOW FLOOR ELEVATION GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF BLOCK (FOUNDATION) ELEVATION 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K 104' - 11" CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF EOFSANMH 4B RE= 1001.70± INV=990.70 SANMH 4 RE= 1004.85± IE(N/E)=989.86 IE(W=989.76 SANMH 3 RE= 1006.05± IE(W)= 990.27 IE(N/E)=990.37 SANMH 3B RE= 1001.55± IE= 991.20 PROPOSED GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX 6" WATER 6" WATER 6" COMBINED DIP WATER SERVICE AND VALVE, STUB TO WITHIN 5' FROM BUILDING, COORD. W/MECH'L STUB 4" SANITARY SERVICE TO 5' FROM BUILDING IE @ STUB=TBD COORD. W/MECH'L STUB 4" SANITARY SERVICE TO 5' FROM BUILDING IE @ STUB=TBD COORD. W/MECH'L CONNECT TO EXISTING 6" PVC WATERMAIN STUB. COORD. WITH CITY 120" CMP UNDERGROUND FILTRATION SYSTEM 24.50'X67' FOOTPRINT (INCL. SIDE AND END STONE) ACCESS RIM=1000.95± TOP OF PIPE=998.50 IE 12" OUTLET=996.75 IE 15" OUTLET=994.60 PIPE IE=987.50 18" SAND BASE IE=986.00 6" PERF. DRAINTILE IE=986.00 100-YR HWL=998.72 STMH 2 RIM=989.50± IE=985.33 CBMH 3 RIM=1000.24± IE (DT)=998.00 IE(E/W)=985.64 210 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% 103 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% FES 1 IE=985.00 66LF 18" RCP @ 0.50% 45 LF 18" HDPE @ 0.80% 62 LF 18" RCP @ 0.50% 207 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% SANMH 3A RE= 1006.20± IE= 990.62 4" FLEXIBLE PERFORATED DRAINTILE IE=998.00 0.00% SLOPE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 4 RE=1001.40± IE (E, 15")=994.60 IE (W, 12")=996.75 IE (DT/W)=986.00 CB 5A RE=1000.50 IE=997.13 CB 6 RE=1000.78 IE=995.00 SUMP IE=991.00 8 LF 15" HDPE @ 25.00% 15" INLET IE=995.00 6" PVC DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION LINE @ 2.00% (TYP.) 12" INLET IE=995.00 SANMH 5 RE= 1001.35± IE(E)= 989.41 IE(S)=989.31 SANMH 6 RE= 1006.45± IE(N)= 989.02 IE(W)=988.92 86 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% 73 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% 348 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 3.14%± 63 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% RE=1009.00 IE=1005.11 8" NYLOPLAST AREA DRAIN W/ SQUARE GRATE, TYP., POSITION AT DOWNSPOUT DISCHARGES, COORD. W/ ARCHITECTURE. RE=1009.00 IE=1004.60 RE=1010.50 IE=1003.58 RE=1003.75 IE=999.60 RE=1002.50± IE=998.50 RE=1002.00± IE=997.82 18" INLET IE=995.00 6 LF 18" HDPE @ 2.00% WHERE WATER CROSSES STORM OR SANITARY, MAINTAIN 18" SEPARATION AND INCLUDE 4" RIGID INSULATION, TYP. 1 2" COPPER WATER SERVICE W/ CURB STOP, TYP. HYDRANT & G.V., TYP. EXISTING FES ? VERIFY PROPOSED GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX 6" WATER 6 LF 15" HDPE @ 2.00% CB 5 RE=1000.50 IE=997.01 SUMP IE=993.01 CB 6A RE=1000.78 IE=995.12 37 LF 12" PVC STORM @ 7.62% RE=1005.75 IE=1001.12 RE=1007.75 IE=1001.64 RE=1009.75 IE=1002.07 RE=1010.00 IE=1002.18 RE=1010.75 IE=1002.42 RE=1010.75 IE=1002.67 RE=1010.50 IE=1002.82 RE=1010.50 IE=1003.00 RE=1010.50 IE=1003.05 RE=1010.50 IE=1004.10 51 LF 6" PVC @ 1.00% 49 LF 6" PVC @ 1.00% 52 LF 8" PVC @ 1.00% 53 LF 8" PVC @ 1.00% 5 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% 18 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% 15 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% 25 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% 24 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% 11 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% 43 LF 12" PVC @ 1.00% 52 LF 12" PVC @ 1.00% 52 LF 12" PVC @ 2.92% 58LF 12" PVC @ 2.75% 68LF 12" PVC @ 1.00% HAMEL ROAD Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " R C P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bit u m i n o u s T r a i l (A Public R/W) POND (LOCAL/MINOR COLLECTOR, PER CITY OF MEDINA) Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL .. .. .. 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/22/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C4.0 UTILITY PLAN .. .. .. .. .. .. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: UTILITY LEGEND: CITY OF MEDINA UTILITY NOTES: 1.THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED ASSOCIATED WITH VARIATIONS IN THE UTILITY ASBUILT PLANS, ELEVATIONS 0R LOCATIONS. 2.WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5' OF COVER. 3.THE CITY REQUIRES TELEVISING FOR SANITARY SEWER PIPE INSTALLATIONS PRIOR TO ACCEPTING A WARRANTY FOR THE UTILITY SYSTEMS; PROVIDE REPORT AND VIDEO FILES TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW. 4.MAINTAIN 18'INCH SEPARATION, 4" RIGID INSULATION AT ANY LOCATION WHERE STORM OR SANITARY SEWER CROSSES WATERMAIN. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R CATCH BASIN GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATER MAIN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT MANHOLE FES AND RIP RAP 1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 4.UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 5.CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. 6.ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION. 10.UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. 11.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 12.ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13.HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL. 14.A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL. 15.A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 16.ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED. 18.COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 19.COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 20.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 21.ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 22.2CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. 23.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. 24.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES. 26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0. 27.FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS 25' IN EACH DIRECTION. SEE PLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALL LOW POINT DRAIN TILE PER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N SANMH 6 RE= 1006.45± IE(N)= 989.02 IE(W)=988.92SANMH 6 RE= 990+/- IE= 978.00 73 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% 348 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 3.14%± 34 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 2.23%± MAKE CORE DRILL CONNECTION TO EXISTING SAN. MH EX RE=988.43 EX IE (S)=977.24 EX IE (W)=976.58 EX IS (E)=976.98 PR. IE (N)=977.24 INLET PROTECTION AT CATCH BASINS, TYP 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 12" RCP 8" PVC 12" WM 15 " R C P Bit u m i n o u s T r a i l (LOCAL/MINOR COLLECTOR, PER CITY OF MEDINA) MH 51 ( R E C O R D D R A W I N G ) RE=996 . 1 7 ( R D ) IE=98 4 . 6 9 ( R D ) MH 50 ( R E C O R D D R A W I N G ) RE=98 8 . 4 3 ( R D ) IE=977 . 2 4 ( R D - S ) IE=97 6 . 5 9 ( R D - W ) IE=97 6 . 9 8 ( R D - E ) Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL .. .. .. 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/22/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C4.1 UTILITY PLAN OFFSITE .. .. .. .. .. .. UTILITY LEGEND: Know what's below. before you dig.Call R CATCH BASIN GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATER MAIN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT MANHOLE FES AND RIP RAP 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K 36' - 11" 15 6 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 104' - 11" CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF EOF 18" DECORATIVE ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP. 18" DECORATIVE ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP. HAMEL ROAD S73°12'09"E 290.00 S1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 8 " W 3 1 7 . 3 4 N74°53'27"W 290.00 N1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 6 " E 3 2 5 . 8 9 2 Story H o u s e 342 Ham e l R d Founda t i o n A r e a = 1,899 S . F . Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " R C P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bit u m i n o u s T r a i l (A Public R/W) Access POND PID: 12 1 1 8 2 3 4 2 0 0 1 5 PID: 12 1 1 8 2 3 4 2 0 0 1 6 Address U n a s s i g n e D (LOCAL/MINOR COLLECTOR, PER CITY OF MEDINA) REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN .. .. .. .. .. .. Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL .. .. .. 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 25821 Robert L. Binder 3/22/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 Know what's below. before you dig.Call R LEGEND PROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES EDGING - HVY. DUTY, COMMERCIAL GRADE, BLACK VINYL, INCLUDE ALL CONNECTORS, STAKES & APPURTENANCES PER MANUF. INSTALL PER MANUF. DECORATIVE BOULDERS (ROUNDED & BLOCK STYLE), 18"-30" DIA. LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1.WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH (MINIMUM AFTER INSTALLATION AND/OR TOP DRESSING OPERATIONS) OF DECORATIVE ROCK MULCH - 3" DK. GREY CRUSHED TRAP ROCK, SAMPLES REQ. 2.ALL TREES NOT IN SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK. 3.IF SHOWN ON PLAN, RANDOM SIZED LIMESTONE BOULDERS COLOR AND SIZE TO COMPLIMENT NEW LANDSCAPING. OWNER TO APPROVE BOULDER SAMPLES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 4.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD. 5.UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 6.CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE. 7.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 6" LAYER TOPSOIL AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 8.COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 9.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE. 10.REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. 11.SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. 12.PROVIDE SITE WIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY PROGRAMMABLE AND CAPABLE OF ALTERNATE DATE WATERING. THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE HEAD TO HEAD OR DRIP COVERAGE AND BE CAPABLE OF DELIVERING ONE INCH OF PRECIPITATION PER WEEK. SYSTEM SHALL EXTEND INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT/BACK OF CURB. 13.CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE APPROVAL OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM INCLUDING PRICING FROM OWNER, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N SEE SHEET L1.1 FOR PLANT SCHEDULE AND GROUND COVER LEGEND TREES CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY AS2 6 Sienna Glen Maple / Acer x freemanii `Sienna` TM 2.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR Y RB 6 River Birch / Betula nigra 2.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE Y BS 3 Shiloh Splash Birch / Betula nigra `Shiloh Splash`2.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR Y CP 3 Prairie Sentinel Hackberry / Celtis occidentalis `JFS-KSU1` TM 2.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR Y GD 6 Street Keeper Honey Locust / Gleditsia triacanthos `Draves` TM 2.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR Y EK 4 Espresso Kentucky Coffeetree / Gymnocladus dioica `Espresso`2.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR Y QS 5 Crimson Spire Oak / Quercus robur x alba `Crimschmidt` TM 2.5" Cal. B&B NOT NATIVE Y EVERGREEN TREES CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY JE 13 Eastern Red Cedar / Juniperus virginiana 6` B&B NATIVE PD 4 Black Hills Spruce / Picea glauca `Densata`6` B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR PT 9 Mugo Pine / Pinus mugo `Tannenbaum`6` B&B NOT NATIVE ORNAMENTAL TREES CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY CV 6 Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn / Crataegus crus-galli inermis TM 1.5" Cal. B&B NOT NATIVE Y MS 8 Spring Snow Crabapple / Malus x `Spring Snow`1.5" Cal. B&B NOT NATIVE Y MB 14 Red Barron Crabapple / Malus x 'Red Barron'1.5" CAL. B&B NOT NATIVE Y SHRUBS CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY DL 9 Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle / Diervilla lonicera #5 CONT NATIVE Y HA 13 Annabelle Hydrangea / Hydrangea arborescens `Annabelle`#5 CONT NATIVE CULTIVAR Y SGJ 35 Sea Green Juniper / Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green`5 gal.NOT NATIVE N JM2 4 Medora Juniper / Juniperus scopulorum `Medora`#5 CONT NOT NATIVE N MD 25 Russian Cypress / Microbiota decussata #5 CONT NOT NATIVE N PD2 29 Little Devil Dwarf Ninebark / Physocarpus opulifolius 'Donna May' TM #5 CONT RE 2 Como Park Easy Elegance Rose / Rosa x `BAlark` TM #5 CONT NOT NATIVE Y TT 16 Taunton`s Yew / Taxus x media `Tauntonii`#5 CONT NOT NATIVE N GRASSES CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY CK 164 Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass / Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster'#1 CONT SB 94 Blue Heaven Little Bluestem / Schizachyrium scoparium `Blue Heaven`#1 CONT Pot PERENNIALS CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY HA2 76 Daylily / Hemerocallis x `Chicago Apache`#1 CONT HS 71 Stella Supreme Daylily / Hemerocallis x 'Stella Supreme'#1 CONT NL2 36 Catmint / Nepeta racemosa `Little Titch`#1 CONT PLANT SCHEDULE GROUND COVERS COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE Dog Park Mulch / Dog Park Mulch Organic mulch specifically preoduced for use in dog parks. Shall knit together to form matted, accessible surface, shall be treated with anti-microbial agent. Mulch Shooting Star No Mow Fine Fescue Mix / No MowSeed Mix Seed Mix Rock Maintanence Strip / Rock Maintanence Strip 1" River rock over filter fabric, include edging as shown & needed. See detail. Mulch Blue Grass Based / Sod Commercial grade, locally grown, "Big Roll" preferred Sod GROUND COVER LEGEND REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION L1.1 LANDSCAPE NOTES, DETAILS & SCHEDULE .. .. .. .. .. .. Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL .. .. .. 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 25821 Robert L. Binder 3/22/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 Know what's below. before you dig.Call R 1.ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2.SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IRRIGATION WATER, METER, AND POWER CONNECTIONS. 3.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/INSTALLATION. ANY DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CORRECTING DAMAGES SHALL BE BORNE ENTIRELY BY THE CONTRACTOR. 4.SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY STANDARDS AND SHALL BE PER NATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES. EXACT LOCATION OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUIVALENT AT THE JOB SITE. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY FOR THE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND METERING FACILITIES. 6.IRRIGATION WATER LINE CONNECTION SIZE IS 1-12" AT BUILDING. VERIFY WITH MECHANICAL PLANS.COVAGE. 7.ALL MAIN LINES SHALL BE 18" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 8.ALL LATERAL LINES SHALL BE 12" BELLOW FINISHED GRADE. 9.ALL EXPOSED PVC RISERS, IF ANY, SHALL BE GRAY IN COLOR. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL LAY ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT AT 2'-0" BELOW THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE TOP OF PAVEMENT. EXTEND SLEEVES TO 2'-0" BEYOND PAVEMENT. 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK THE LOCATION OF ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT WITH THE SLEEVING MATERIAL "ELLED" TO 2'-0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AND CAPPED. 12.FABRICATE ALL PIPE TO MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH CLEAN AND SQUARE CUT JOINTS. USE QUALITY GRADE PRIMER AND SOLVENT CEMENT FORMULATED FOR INTENDED TYPE OF CONNECTION. 13.BACKFILL ALL TRENCHES WITH SOIL FREE OF SHARP OBJECTS AND DEBRIS. 14.ALL VALVE BOXES AND COVERS SHALL BE BLACK IN COLOR. 15.GROUP VALVE BOXES TOGETHER FOR EASE WHEN SERVICE IS REQUIRED. LOCATE IN PLANT BED AREAS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 16.IRRIGATION CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED ON-SITE WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 17.CONTROL WIRES: 14 GAUGE DIRECT BURIAL, SOLID COPPER IRRIGATION WIRE. RUN UNDER MAIN LINE. USE MOISTURE-PROOF SPLICES AND SPLICE ONLY AT VALVES OR PULL BOXES. RUN SEPARATE HOT AND COMMON WIRE TO EACH VALVE AND ONE (1) SPARE WIRE AND GROUND TO FURTHEST VALVE FROM CONTROLLER. LABEL OR COLOR CODE ALL WIRES. 18.AVOID OVER SPRAY ON BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, WALLS AND ROADWAYS BY INDIVIDUALLY ADJUSTING RADIUS OR ARC ON SPRINKLER HEADS AND FLOW CONTROL ON AUTOMATIC VALVE. 19.ADJUST PRESSURE REGULATING VALVES FOR OPTIMUM PRESSURE ON SITE. 20.USE SCREENS ON ALL HEADS. 21.A SET OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON-SITE AT ALL TIMES IN AN UPDATED CONDITION. 22.ALL PIPE 3" AND OVER SHALL HAVE THRUST BLOCKING AT EACH TURN. 23.ALL AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVES WILL HAVE 3" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL UNDERNEATH VALVE AND VALVE BOX. GRAVEL SHALL EXTENT 3" BEYOND PERIMETER OF VALVE BOX. 24.THERE SHALL BE 3" MINIMUM SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX COVER AND TOP OF VALVE STRUCTURE. IRRIGATION NOTES: FACE OF BUILDING, WALL, OR STRUCTURE MIN. 3" LAYER OF ROCK MULCH AS SPECIFIED. PROVIDE SAMPLE TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FINISHED GRADE COMPACTED SUBGRADE WATER PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AS SPECIFIED 24" - VERIFY W/ PLAN AGGREGATE MAINTANENCE STRIP - 24" N T S STAKED LANDSCAPE EDGER AS SPECIFIED, SEE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND SPECS. FOR INSTALLATION AND PLACEMENT SLOPE - MIN. 2%, MAX. 5:1 VERIFY W/ GRADING PLAN 1 PERENNIAL BED PLANTING N T S PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE ROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TO ENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACT SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED EXISTING GRADE ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT STEM BACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATION DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL. SIZE VARIES SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT 4 DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS SHRUB PLANTING N T S PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL SHAPE FOR SPECIES) PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE ROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TO ENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACT SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED EXISTING GRADE ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT TRUNK BACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATION DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL. THREE TIMES WIDTH OF ROOTBALL RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT 3 THREE TIMES WIDTH OF ROOTBALL DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING N T S PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE 2"X4"X8' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120° TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH NYLON STRAPPING WITH GROMMETS. ALTERNATE STABILIZING METHODS MAY BE PROPOSED BY CONTRACTOR. TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1"-2" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT TRUNK EXISTING GRADE CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. IF NON-BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED COMPACT BOTTOM OF PIT, TYP. RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT 2 LEGEND SEE SHEET L1.0 FOR LANDSCAPE LEGEND ALL PLANTING BEDS & BUILDING MAINTENANCE STRIPS - 3" DK. GREY CRUSHED TRAP ROCK. INCLUDE PERMEABLE GEO-TEXTILE (PER DETAIL) IN MAINTENANCE STRIP AREAS ONLY. SAMPLES REQ. BEFORE INSTALLATION. PROVIDE EDGING AS SHOWN ON PLAN ARCHITECTOWNER MEP ENGINEERSTRUCTURAL ENGINEER 30 7 B S W M a r k e t S t . , L e e ' s S u m m i t , M i s s o u r i , 6 4 0 6 3 P: 8 1 6 . 5 9 0 . 9 2 4 4 w w w . c o l l i n s a n d w e b b . c o m CIVIL ENGINEER COLLINS WEBB #: HAMEL TOWNHOMES CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW 05 APRIL 2022 21082 342 Hamel Road, Medina, MN 55340 CIVIL SITE GROUP 5000 GLENWOOD AVE GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55416 P: 612.615.0060 civilsitegroup.com LEIGH & O'KANE 250 NE MULBERRY SUITE 201 LEE'S SUMMIT, MO 64086 P: 816.444.3144 www.leok.com/ PKMR ENGINEERS 13300 W 98TH ST LENEXA, KS 66215 P: 913.492.2400 www.pkmreng.com/ COLLINS | WEBB ARCHITECTURE 307B SW MARKET ST. LEE'S SUMMIT, MO 64063 P: 816.249.2270 www.collinsandwebb.com HAMEL TOWNHOMES LLC REF.REF.REF.REF. D W W D W W A200 A8 A200 E8 GARAGEGARAGE DININGLIVING KITCHEN BATH DINING LIVING KITCHEN BATH GARAGE DININGLIVING KITCHEN BATH A200H5A200H11 GARAGE DINING LIVING KITCHEN BATH 104' - 0" 5' - 4 " 50 ' - 0 3 / 4 " 1' - 0"79' - 0"1' - 0" 6' - 0"40' - 0"12' - 0"40' - 0"6' - 0" ISSUE DATE: COLLINS WEBB #: PROFESSIONAL SEAL COPYRIGHT © BY COLLINS WEBB ARCHITECTURE, LLC K J H G F E D C B A 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 K J H G F E D C B A REVISION DATES: 30 7 B S W M a r k e t S t r e e t , L e e ' s S u m m i t , M i s s o u r i , 6 4 0 6 3 P : 8 1 6 . 2 4 9 . 2 2 7 0 w w w . c o l l i n s a n d w e b b . c o m 4/ 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 9 : 0 1 : 4 3 A M 4 PLEX PLANS HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 05 APRIL 2022 21082 34 2 H a m e l R o a d , M e d i n a , M N 5 5 3 4 0 CO N C E P T P L A N R E V I E W A101 1/8" = 1'-0"A6 1ST FLOOR PLAN - 4 PLEX 1/8" = 1'-0"F6 2ND FLOOR - 4 PLEX 1/8" = 1'-0"F11 ROOF PLAN - 4 PLEX ROOF RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . D W W D W W D W W A201E8A201A12 A201 H5 15 6 ' - 0 " 35' - 11 5/8"14' - 1 1/8" 50' - 0 3/4" 5' - 4" 26 ' - 0 " 21' - 5" 24 ' - 1 0 5 / 8 " DINING LIVING GARAGE KITCHEN BATH 6' - 0 " 40 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 40 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 40 ' - 0 " DINING LIVING GARAGE KITCHEN BATH DINING LIVING GARAGE KITCHEN BATH DINING LIVING GARAGE KITCHEN BATH DINING LIVING GARAGE KITCHEN BATH DINING LIVING GARAGE KITCHEN BATH FIRE LINE ENTRANCE RM 24 ' - 1 0 5 / 8 " BEDBED BED BED BED BED BED 1. RE: SHEET G001 FOR ADDITIONAL GENERAL NOTES THAT ARE APPLICABLE. 2. RE: SHEET G003 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS AND NOTES THAT ARE APPLICABLE. 3. RE: SHEET A901 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS AND NOTES THAT ARE APPLICABLE. 4. ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION 100'-0" = SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR F.F.E. AT EACH UNIT. 5. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN ARE TO THE FACE OF STUD, FACE OF MASONRY (FOM), FACE OF CONCRETE WALLS (FOC), AND COLUMN GRID LINES, UNLESS NOTED OR SHOWN OTHERWISE. 6. NOTE: WALL THICKNESSES ARE ACTUAL DIMENSIONS. 7. DOOR OPENINGS NOT LOCATED BY DIMENSION SHALL BE CENTERED IN WALL SHOWN OR LOCATED 3 INCHES FROM FINISH WALL TO HINGE SIDE OF THE DOOR. 8. ALL CLOSETS AND ALCOVES WITHOUT A SPACE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER SHALL HAVE THE SAME FINISHES AS THE ADJOINING SPACES. 9. INTERIOR AND GARAGE STAIR RISERS VARY PENDING FINAL CIVIL F.F.E. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY STAIR RISERS PER EACH UNIT AND MAINTAIN CODE REQ'D OVERHEAD CLEARANCES AS NOTED ON A901. GENERAL NOTES FLOOR PLANS: ISSUE DATE: COLLINS WEBB #: PROFESSIONAL SEAL COPYRIGHT © BY COLLINS WEBB ARCHITECTURE, LLC K J H G F E D C B A 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 K J H G F E D C B A REVISION DATES: 30 7 B S W M a r k e t S t r e e t , L e e ' s S u m m i t , M i s s o u r i , 6 4 0 6 3 P : 8 1 6 . 2 4 9 . 2 2 7 0 w w w . c o l l i n s a n d w e b b . c o m 4/ 5 / 2 0 2 2 6 : 4 0 : 2 5 P M 6 PLEX PLANS HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 05 APRIL 2022 21082 34 2 H a m e l R o a d , M e d i n a , M N 5 5 3 4 0 CO N C E P T P L A N R E V I E W A102 1/8" = 1'-0"A3 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"A8 2ND FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"A12 ROOF PLAN RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . D W W D W W D W W D W W A202 A10 A202E10 A202 H5 DINING LIVING KITCHEN BATH GARAGE DINING LIVING KITCHEN BATH GARAGE DINING LIVING KITCHEN GARAGE DINING LIVING KITCHEN GARAGE DINING LIVING KITCHEN GARAGE DINING LIVING KITCHEN GARAGE DINING LIVING KITCHEN GARAGE DINING LIVING KITCHEN GARAGE A203E10A203A10 A203 H5 20 8 ' - 0 " 50' - 0 3/4" 14' - 0" 6' - 0 " 40 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " A202 A10 A202 H5 SLAB ON GRADE WALKOUT RE: CIVIL COORDINATE DRAINAGE TILE SLEEVE LOCATIONS THROUGH FOOTINGS OF ADJACENT BASEMENT UNITS LOOKOUT BASEMENT WALKOUT BASEMENT WALKOUT BASEMENT WALKOUT BASEMENT WALKOUT BASEMENT WALKOUT BASEMENT WALKOUT BASEMENT LOOKOUT BASEMENT A203 A10 A203 H5 FI R E E N T SLAB ON GRADE WALKOUT RE: CIVIL EGRESS WINDOW WELL A202 H5 A203 H5 ISSUE DATE: COLLINS WEBB #: PROFESSIONAL SEAL COPYRIGHT © BY COLLINS WEBB ARCHITECTURE, LLC K J H G F E D C B A 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 K J H G F E D C B A REVISION DATES: 30 7 B S W M a r k e t S t r e e t , L e e ' s S u m m i t , M i s s o u r i , 6 4 0 6 3 P : 8 1 6 . 2 4 9 . 2 2 7 0 w w w . c o l l i n s a n d w e b b . c o m 4/ 5 / 2 0 2 2 6 : 4 0 : 2 7 P M 8 PLEX FLOOR PLANS HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 05 APRIL 2022 21082 34 2 H a m e l R o a d , M e d i n a , M N 5 5 3 4 0 CO N C E P T P L A N R E V I E W A103 1/8" = 1'-0"A7 8 UNIT 1ST FLOOR TYPICAL 1/8" = 1'-0"A3 8 UNIT WEST BUILDING - BASEMENT WALKOUT 1/8" = 1'-0"A11 8 UNIT 2ND FLOOR TYPICAL 2ND LEVEL 109' -11 1/8" 1ST LEVEL 100' -0" TOP OF WALL 119' -0 1/4" 2ND LEVEL 109' -11 1/8" 1ST LEVEL 100' -0" TOP OF WALL 119' -0 1/4" TYPICAL FIRE ENTRANCE ROOM 2ND LEVEL 109' -11 1/8" 1ST LEVEL 100' -0" TOP OF WALL 119' -0 1/4" 2ND LEVEL 109' -11 1/8" 1ST LEVEL 100' -0" TOP OF WALL 119' -0 1/4" GENERAL NOTE: FLOOR LEVELS TYPICAL FOR EACH LEVEL TYPE PRIMARY ROOF -ASPHALT SHINGLE COLOR: BLACK LAP SIDING COLOR: WHITE VERTICAL SIDING COLOR: WHITE PORCH BRICK COLOR: WHITE ISSUE DATE: COLLINS WEBB #: PROFESSIONAL SEAL COPYRIGHT © BY COLLINS WEBB ARCHITECTURE, LLC K J H G F E D C B A 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 K J H G F E D C B A REVISION DATES: 30 7 B S W M a r k e t S t r e e t , L e e ' s S u m m i t , M i s s o u r i , 6 4 0 6 3 P : 8 1 6 . 2 4 9 . 2 2 7 0 w w w . c o l l i n s a n d w e b b . c o m 4/ 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 8 : 5 0 : 2 0 A M 4 -PLEX EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 05 APRIL 2022 21082 34 2 H a m e l R o a d , M e d i n a , M N 5 5 3 4 0 CO N C E P T P L A N R E V I E W A200 3/16" = 1'-0"A8 HAMEL ROAD VIEW 3/16" = 1'-0"H11 4 PLEX - WEST VIEW 3/16" = 1'-0"H5 4 PLEX - EAST VIEW 3/16" = 1'-0"E8 NORTH VIEW CONCEPTUAL MATERIALS TYPICAL FIRE ENTRANCE ROOM ON 6 PLEX & EAST 8 PLEX BUILDING ISSUE DATE: COLLINS WEBB #: PROFESSIONAL SEAL COPYRIGHT © BY COLLINS WEBB ARCHITECTURE, LLC K J H G F E D C B A 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 K J H G F E D C B A REVISION DATES: 30 7 B S W M a r k e t S t r e e t , L e e ' s S u m m i t , M i s s o u r i , 6 4 0 6 3 P : 8 1 6 . 2 4 9 . 2 2 7 0 w w w . c o l l i n s a n d w e b b . c o m 4/ 5 / 2 0 2 2 6 : 4 1 : 1 7 P M 6 -PLEX EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 05 APRIL 2022 21082 34 2 H a m e l R o a d , M e d i n a , M N 5 5 3 4 0 CO N C E P T P L A N R E V I E W A201 3/16" = 1'-0"E8 6 - PLEX - FRONT ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"H5 6 - PLEX - SIDE ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"A12 6 - PLEX - BACK ELEVATION PRIMARY ROOF -ASPHALT SHINGLE COLOR: BLACK LAP SIDING COLOR: WHITE VERTICAL SIDING COLOR: WHITE PORCH BRICK COLOR: WHITE ISSUE DATE: COLLINS WEBB #: PROFESSIONAL SEAL COPYRIGHT © BY COLLINS WEBB ARCHITECTURE, LLC K J H G F E D C B A 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 K J H G F E D C B A REVISION DATES: 30 7 B S W M a r k e t S t r e e t , L e e ' s S u m m i t , M i s s o u r i , 6 4 0 6 3 P : 8 1 6 . 2 4 9 . 2 2 7 0 w w w . c o l l i n s a n d w e b b . c o m 4/ 5 / 2 0 2 2 6 : 4 1 : 4 7 P M 8 -PLEX -WEST BUILDING - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 05 APRIL 2022 21082 34 2 H a m e l R o a d , M e d i n a , M N 5 5 3 4 0 CO N C E P T P L A N R E V I E W A202 1/8" = 1'-0"A10 8 - PLEX - BACK WALKOUT ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"E10 8 - PLEX - FRONT WALKOUT ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"H5 8 - PLEX - SIDE WALKOUT ELEVATION PRIMARY ROOF -ASPHALT SHINGLE COLOR: BLACK LAP SIDING COLOR: WHITE VERTICAL SIDING COLOR: WHITE PORCH BRICK COLOR: WHITE ISSUE DATE: COLLINS WEBB #: PROFESSIONAL SEAL COPYRIGHT © BY COLLINS WEBB ARCHITECTURE, LLC K J H G F E D C B A 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 K J H G F E D C B A REVISION DATES: 30 7 B S W M a r k e t S t r e e t , L e e ' s S u m m i t , M i s s o u r i , 6 4 0 6 3 P : 8 1 6 . 2 4 9 . 2 2 7 0 w w w . c o l l i n s a n d w e b b . c o m 4/ 5 / 2 0 2 2 6 : 3 7 : 3 6 P M 8 -PLEX -EAST BUILDING - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 05 APRIL 2022 21082 34 2 H a m e l R o a d , M e d i n a , M N 5 5 3 4 0 CO N C E P T P L A N R E V I E W A203 1/8" = 1'-0"E10 8 - PLEX - FRONT ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"A10 8 - PLEX - BACK ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"H5 8 - PLEX - SIDE ELEVATION PRIMARY ROOF -ASPHALT SHINGLE COLOR: BLACK LAP SIDING COLOR: WHITE VERTICAL SIDING COLOR: WHITE PORCH BRICK COLOR: WHITE Jeffrey Bonner – 2055 Tamarack Dr. Page 1 of 5 May 3, 2022 Setback Variance City Council Meeting MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Debra Dion, Associate Planner; through Director of Planning Finke DATE: April 26, 2022 MEETING: May 3, 2022, City Council SUBJ: Public Hearing - Jeffrey Bonner – 2055 Tamarack Dr. – Variance from setback requirements Review Deadline Complete Application Received: March 15, 2022 90-day Review Deadline: June 12, 2022 Summary of Request Jeffrey Bonner, the applicant/property owner, requests approval of a variance from the 150 foot minimum side yard setback requirement to rebuild a new barn on his property at 2055 Tamarack Drive. The existing 26’ x 30’ barn is proposed to be torn down and a new 42’ x 70’ barn rebuilt in its current location and expanding to the west and south. The proposed barn would have added storage and a more functional barn than what exists currently. The subject property and all surrounding properties are zoned RR, Rural Residential. An aerial of the property is below: Agenda Item #8B Jeffrey Bonner – 2055 Tamarack Dr. Page 2 of 5 May 3, 2022 Setback Variance City Council Meeting History of Existing Barn In 1978 a Setback Variance was granted for the construction of a 26’ x 30’ barn. At that time, a 500-foot front yard setback was required from Tamarack Drive. The barn was constructed and is approximately 180 feet from the front yard property line and 110 feet from the northern property line. Existing Barn Floor Plan Proposed Barn Floor Plan Jeffrey Bonner – 2055 Tamarack Dr. Page 3 of 5 May 3, 2022 Setback Variance City Council Meeting Setback Requirements The RR, Rural Residential zoning district requires a minimum setback of 50 feet for all non- animal structures and 150-feet for all animal structures. The applicant requests to continue to have horses and requests a variance from the setback requirement from the northern property line. The applicant will survey the property line if the variance is granted to make sure the barn will not get any closer than 110 feet from the north (side yard). The remaining yards would be approximately 161 feet from the south (side yard), approximately 180 feet from the east (front), and approximately 473 feet from the west (rear). Requirement Existing Barn Proposed Barn Min. Front Yard Setback (east) 150 feet 180 feet 180 feet Min. Rear Yard Setback (west) 150 feet 485 feet 445 feet Min. Side Setback (north) 150 feet 110feet 110 feet Min. Side Setback (south) 150 feet 172 feet 156+- feet Maximum Building Size 5,000 sf 780 sf 2,940 sf Max. Building Height 30 feet 13’ feet 20 feet Grazable Acres The applicant currently has three horses and the property allows for three horses based on grazable acres. The proposed barn would have three stalls. Grading Summary The applicant proposes to raise the floor level of the new barn approximately 18-24” to help improve the overall drainage in the area. Currently, the barn does not have appropriate drainage and has caused structural damage to the barn. Specific grading details would be provided if the Variance were granted. The City Engineer and applicant would work together prior to a permit being issued for the barn. Jeffrey Bonner – 2055 Tamarack Dr. Page 4 of 5 May 3, 2022 Setback Variance City Council Meeting Variance Criteria Subd. 2 of Section 825.45 of the City Code establishes criteria which the City must find in order for a variance to be approved. The applicant describes how they believe these criteria are met within their narrative, which is attached for reference. The criteria are following, along with potential findings provided by staff in italics: (a) A variance shall only be granted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. Staff believes that it is the intent of the ordinance to allow property owners with the rights to construct animal accessory buildings that are large enough to appropriately manage animals as should be required and needed for their care. The ordinance is also created to provide enough square footage per lot to allow property owners to store their recreational vehicles and/or farm equipment. The proposed 42’ x 72’ barn improves the conditions operationally, structurally, and aesthetically and actually falls below the square footage that is allowed for the property. (b) A variance shall only be granted when it is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff does not believe the variance would be inconsistent with the objectives of the comprehensive plan. (c) A variance may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. Economic considerations alone do not constitute a practical difficulty. In order for a practical difficulty to be established, all of the following criteria shall be met: (1) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. In determining if the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, the board shall consider, among other factors, whether the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty and whether the variance confers upon the applicant any special privileges that are denied to the owners of other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district; Staff believes the property owner is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner. The use/barns are permitted in the RR district. Constructing a 42’ x 72’ barn on a 5+ acre property is not giving the property owner any special privileges than any other landowner in the area/same zoning district. The size of the barn is minimal for 3 horses and does not provide space for hay, which would be needed more than likely year- round. This barn could actually be larger to accommodate hay. Staff believes this barn is being proposed in a reasonable manner. The barn also provides a storage area for a boat to be kept under cover, rather than outdoors. A significant portion of the barn is non-animal use, which requires a 50-foot setback. (2) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and A lot of this size if it wasn’t restricted by the 313.5’ front and rear yard width restrictions, would be allowed to have a 5,000 sf barn. The applicant is asking for 2,940 sf. The narrow width of the lot restricts the applicant from meeting the City’s adopted 150’ animal structure setback requirement. Jeffrey Bonner – 2055 Tamarack Dr. Page 5 of 5 May 3, 2022 Setback Variance City Council Meeting (3) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The locality of the area is rural residential and barns are part of the overall character of this area. The existing barn was approved and constructed over 40 years ago and the request is similar as it relates to setback from property line from the north. Planning Considerations and Findings The property is showing a barn footprint that is designed with logistical needs in mind and to minimally alter the lot. As a result, the grades will be raised for the barn, which will be an improvement. Staff feels the applicant has put much consideration into the planning of the barn layout and need to raise it up. Staff feels this is an improvement. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the request at their April 12th meeting. There was no public comment at the hearing. The Planning Commission found that the Variance criteria were met as described in the report and recommended approval of the variance with the conditions noted below: Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the variance requested with the findings described above and subject to the conditions that follow. The City may impose conditions in the granting of the variance to ensure compliance and to protect adjacent properties. Staff recommends the following conditions: 1. A grading plan shall be submitted with the building permit for the barn showing how run- off will be handled flowing around and away from the barn. 2. The Applicant shall construct the barn no closer than 110 feet from the north property line. A surveyor will be required to mark the property line on-site, or a survey completed and submitted to the City. 3. The maximum number of animal units for the subject property is three. 4. The Applicant shall construct the barn in substantial conformance with the plans dated March 15, 2022, except as amended herein. 5. The Applicant shall commence construction within one year of the approval of this variance, after one year the approval of the variance shall be considered null and void. 6. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the request. Potential Motion The Council, as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, should hold a public hearing on the request. If, following the hearing, the Council agrees that the variance criteria are met, the following action could be taken: Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the variance, subject to the conditions noted in the staff report.” Attachments 1. Excerpt from draft April 12, 2022, Planning Commission minutes 2. Applicant’s Narrative 3. Site Plan CITY OF MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT Meeting Minutes Tuesday April 12, 2022 1. Call to Order: Chairperson Nielsen called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Planning Commissioners Ron Grajczyk, Beth Nielsen, Cindy Piper (arrived at 7:42 p.m.), Justin Popp, Braden Rhem and Timothy Sedabres. Absent: Planning Commissioner John Jacob. Also Present: City Planning Director Dusty Finke, City Planner Deb Dion, Planning Consultant Nate Sparks, and Planning Intern Colette Baumgardner 7. Public Hearing – Jeffrey Bonner – 2055 Tamarack Drive – Variance from Required 150-Foot Setback to Replace Existing Barn with Larger Structure Dion presented a request from Jeffrey Bonner for a variance of 150 feet from the setback to the north property line. She stated that there is an existing barn which received a setback variance in 1978. She noted that all surrounding properties are zoned RR, and all animal structures require a setback of 150 feet from the property line. She stated that the property owner currently has three horses and provided details on the layout and features that would be included in the proposed barn, also comparing that to the layout and features of the existing barn. She noted that part of the expansion would include space to store vehicles and a boat. She stated that the proposed barn would be about 110 feet from the northern property line. She stated that the existing barn is deteriorating because of drainage issues on the property that has caused flooding in the barn. She noted that part of the process would include raising the elevation of the barn site to improve drainage. Piper asked for clarification on the property location. Dion clarified the location, noting it is on the north side of CR 24. Jeffrey Bonner, applicant, stated that he is present to answer any questions. He thanked the Commission, planning staff, and Finke and Dion for their assistance and consideration. He stated that they look forward to working with the City to ensure they work in harmony with the intent of the rural residential area and improve their property. Nielsen asked if the applicant is aware of any objections from neighbors. Bonner replied that they did provide verbal and written notice to the neighbors, and he did not receive any objections. Dion stated that she received a number of calls as a result of the land use application sign on the property. She stated that she answered the questions of the callers, and no objections were expressed. Nielsen opened the public hearing at 8:08 p.m. No comments. Nielsen closed the public hearing at 8:09 p.m. Piper commented that this is good use of land and understands the desire to improve the barn. Nielsen stated that her only concern would be related to runoff from the increased elevation and footprint but believed that was addressed within the conditions recommended by staff. Motion by Piper, seconded by Popp, to recommend approval of the variance request from the required 150-foot setback to replace existing barn with larger structure for the property located at 2055 Tamarack Drive with attention to drainage/runoff. A roll call vote was performed: Grajczyk aye Popp aye Piper aye Rhem aye Sedabres aye Nielsen aye Motion carries unanimously. Marsh Pointe Preserve Page 1 of 7 May 3, 2022 Final Plat and Easement Vacation City Council Meeting TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: April 28, 2022 MEETING: May 3, 2022 City Council SUBJECT: Public Hearing – BPS Properties, LLC – 4250-4292 Arrowhead Dr. – Marsh Pointe Preserve – Final Plat, Easement Vacation, Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District Summary of Request On March 1, 2022, the City Council granted PUD General Plan of Development and Preliminary Plat approval to BPS Properties for Marsh Pointe Preserve. The plat proposed 30 detached single family villas and various outlots. A copy of Ordinance 683, which establishes the Marsh Pointe Preserve PUD, is attached for reference. The subject site is located east of Arrowhead Drive and south of Bridgewater. An aerial of the site can be found at the top of the following page. The applicant has now requested final approval for the project, to which the following actions are connected: 1) Final Plat 2) Vacation of easements on underlying platted property 3) Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District establishment 4) Development Agreement The City’s practice is to establish Storm Sewer Improvement Taxing District over development sites as a “back-up plan” if the homeowner’s association does not maintain stormwater improvements. The City has taken this step in all recent residential subdivisions. Prior to considering the establishment of such as district, the City Council is required to hold a Public Hearing. Notice of this public hearing was published for the April 19 meeting. Final Plat Consistency with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, zoning and subdivision regulations, and other relevant policies was reviewed during review of the Preliminary Plat. The purpose of a final plat review is to ensure that the final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat and to ensure that all the conditions of approval have been met. Consistency with Preliminary Plat It appears that the proposed plat layout is substantially similar to the approved preliminary plat. MEMORANDUM • 30 detached villas • 12.16 net acres • 2.47 unit/net acre • 36+ gross acres • Guided LDR (2-3 u/a) Agenda Item #8C Marsh Pointe Preserve Page 2 of 7 May 3, 2022 Final Plat and Easement Vacation City Council Meeting Preliminary Plat Conditions Following is a list of conditions which were required upon preliminary approval. Many conditions would be recommended to be included on a final plat action. Staff has summarized how each has or will be addressed in italics. 1) The approvals hereby granted are contingent upon approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan, approval of which must be obtained prior to action on the final plat. The City Council approved the Replacement Plan on March 1. Staff has included the requirement complete the required replacement in the development agreement. 2) The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include the conditions described below as well as other requirements of city ordinance or policy. Staff has drafted a development agreement for review and approval by the City Council. Staff recommends execution as a condition of approval. 3) The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated December 15, 2021 except as may be modified herein. Final plans shall be provided at the time of final plat and shall address the comments of the City Engineer, Fire Marshal, Elm Creek Watershed District, other relevant staff and agencies and the conditions noted herein. The plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Plans have been reviewed and staff has recommended certain changes. Staff recommends that these comments be addressed as a condition of approval. Marsh Pointe Preserve Page 3 of 7 May 3, 2022 Final Plat and Easement Vacation City Council Meeting 4) The plat shall provide drainage and utility easements over all stormwater improvements, wetlands, and drainageways and along the perimeter of lots as recommended by the City Engineer. Staff recommends that this be included as a condition of approval. 5) The Applicant shall meet the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance, including provision of easements, planting of vegetation and installation of signage. Plans identify required buffers and completion of these tasks are required by the development agreement. Staff recommends that this be included as a condition of approval. 6) Homes constructed within the PUD shall be consistent with the architectural requirements approved by the City Council at the time of final plat approval and as described in Ordinance 683. This is an informational condition and staff recommends that this be included as a condition of approval. 7) The Applicant shall update the plat to dedicate Outlot D of the preliminary plat, located at the southeast corner of Arrowhead Drive and “Street A,” as right-of-way. Landscaping may be allowed within this area if approved by City staff, but may be removed at any time if deemed necessary by the City. The plat submitted provides this right-of-way. 8) The Applicant shall construct a turn lane on Arrowhead Drive at the proposed intersection with “Street A” recommended by the City Engineer. Staff recommends a condition requiring right-turn improvements at the site access, which has also been incorporated into the draft development agreement. 9) The Applicant shall update the street alignment as recommended by the City Engineer, including removing sudden curves of “Street A” approaching Arrowhead Drive and providing a wider a boulevard between the street and trail. Street plans were updated and addressing engineering comments is recommended as a condition. 10) The Applicant shall grant trail easements as recommended by City staff for the trails shown on the plan. The Applicant shall pay a park dedication fee of $141,400 in lieu of additional land dedication. Staff recommends that park dedication be provided as follows. Location of trail easements are depicted on the attached map. 1) Trail easements from Arrowhead Drive to Medina Lake Preserve. 2) Trail easements for two potential extensions of the Diamond Lake Regional Trail (southeast of Medina Lake Preserve and west and south of Block 4). 3) Construction of trails (credit of $18,038 be provided for construction of trails outside of right-of-way). 4) Park dedication fee of $123,362. 11) The Applicant has represented to the City that it has agreements with the owners of parcels to the north of the Property related to the removal of dead trees and invasive species and installation of new landscaping that it has access to those parcels to perform the required work. Marsh Pointe Preserve Page 4 of 7 May 3, 2022 Final Plat and Easement Vacation City Council Meeting The Applicant shall update the landscaping plans to incorporate the work required by these agreements. Staff recommends that this be included as a condition of approval. 12) The Applicant shall update landscaping plans to identify proposed landscaping on adjust the location of plantings so that vegetation will not interfere with the trail when mature. Staff recommends that this be included as a condition of approval. 13) The Applicant shall update grading in the rear of Block 2 so that drainage does not impact the trail. The grading in this area has been updated. Staff recommends a condition that all comments of the City Engineer be addressed. 14) The Applicant shall submit information to verify that the average 50-foot buffer is provided around the wetlands. The applicant has submitted an exhibit confirming the required buffer area. 15) The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site improvements to ensure completion. Staff recommends that this be included as a condition of approval. 16) The Applicant shall execute and record a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney to describe the responsibility of the property owners to maintain the private stormwater improvements. Staff recommends that this be included as a condition of approval. 17) The property shall be subject to the City’s lawn and landscaping irrigation regulations. No lawn or landscape irrigation systems shall be permitted to be connected to the City water system. The Applicant shall address comments of the City Engineer and Public Works Director related to the design and installation of the irrigation system. The applicant has submitted preliminary information on irrigation utilizing the stormwater ponds. 18) The Applicant shall obtain all permits required by Elm Creek Watershed District, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council and any other relevant agencies. Staff recommends that this be included as a condition of approval. 19) The Applicant shall provide title evidence prior to or at the time of final plat application and abide by the recommendations of the City Attorney with regard to title matters and recording instructions. Title information was submitted and staff recommends a condition of that the applicant address City Attorney comments. 20) The final plat shall accommodate to the satisfaction of the City the 30-foot wide strip of property currently owned by the City adjacent to the Property. The development agreement includes a provision by which the City would sell the strip of property to be included in the plat. Marsh Pointe Preserve Page 5 of 7 May 3, 2022 Final Plat and Easement Vacation City Council Meeting 21) The Applicant shall dedicate on the final plat or otherwise provide an easement to the City to accommodate the future Diamond Lake Trail extension across the wetland south and east of Block 5. The easement shall provide flexibility for its location across the wetland area. Staff recommends that this be included as a condition of approval. 22) The final plat application shall be filed within 180 days of the date of this resolution or the approval hereby granted shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council. The application was received within this timeframe. 23) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, construction plans, and other relevant documents. Staff recommends that this be included as a condition of approval. Review Criteria/Staff Recommendation Section 820.21 Subd. 10 establishes the following criteria for the review of subdivisions: “In the case of all subdivisions, the City shall deny approval of a preliminary or final plat if one or a combination of the following findings are made: (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city, or that the proposed subdivision is premature, as defined in Section 820.28. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. Staff recommends approval of the final plat, subject to the conditions described in the attached resolution. Easement Vacation During review of the plat and title information, drainage and utility easements were identified which were dedicated to the public on the western of the four existing properties. These easements are located along the perimeter of the existing lot and over the wetland to the southeast and are highlighted on the exhibit at the top of the following page. Dedication of necessary drainage and utility easements based upon the proposed development layout will be provided on the Marsh Pointe Preserve plat. The existing easements would run through the middle of a couple of the proposed lots and would not be necessary with the new layout. The applicant has proposed that the City vacate the existing easements, contingent upon dedication of new easements on the Marsh Pointe Preserve plat. Marsh Pointe Preserve Page 6 of 7 May 3, 2022 Final Plat and Easement Vacation City Council Meeting According to Minnesota Statute 462.358 subd. 7: “The governing body of a municipality may vacate any publicly owned utility easement…which are not being used for sewer, drainage, electric, telegraph, telephone, gas and steam purposes or for boulevard reserve purposes, in the same manner as vacation proceedings are conducted for streets…” According to Minnesota Statutes 412.851, “The council may by resolution vacate any street, alley, public grounds, public way, or any part thereof, on its own motion or on petition of a majority of the owners of land abutting on the street, alley, public grounds, public way, or part thereof to be vacated. When there has been no petition, the resolution may be adopted only by a vote of four-fifths of all members of the council. No vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so after a hearing preceded by two weeks' published and posted notice.” Notice was published and mailed for a public hearing on the vacation at the May 3 Council meeting. Staff received no contact from the notice. Pending any feedback from the public hearing, staff believes that, subject to dedication of the easements on the Marsh Pointe preserve plat, the new easements better serve the public interest. As a result, staff recommends approval of the vacation. Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District The City’s practice has been to require Homeowner’s Associations (HOAs) to be responsible for maintenance of stormwater improvements which manage runoff from the neighborhood. The City has also established Storm Sewer Improvement Taxing District over development sites as a “back-up plan” if the homeowner’s association does not maintain stormwater improvements. Marsh Pointe Preserve Page 7 of 7 May 3, 2022 Final Plat and Easement Vacation City Council Meeting The City has taken this step in all recent residential subdivisions. The tax district would allow the City to levy a tax against just the property in the Marsh Pointe development to cover maintenance costs if the HOA failed to do so. To date, the City has not levied taxes against any of the districts established. At the April 19, 2022 meeting, the City Council held a public hearing on the potential establishment of a Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District for Marsh Pointe Preserve. This hearing was held because notice had been provided for the 4/19 meeting, anticipating potential action on the project at that meeting. Action on the tax district was delayed to May 3 to be considered concurrently with the plat. No one spoke at the public hearing on April 19. Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance establishing the Marsh Pointe Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District. Potential Action If the City Council finds that the proposed plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat and that all preliminary plat conditions have been addressed or will be addressed as a condition of final approval, staff recommends the following actions: 1. Motion to adopt the resolution granting final plat approval for Marsh Pointe Preserve. 2. Motion to adopt the resolution vacating drainage and utility easements at 4250 Arrowhead Drive. 3. Motion to adopt the ordinance establishing the Marsh Pointe Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District. 4. Motion to adopt the resolution authorizing publication of the ordinance by title and summary 5. Motion to approve the Planned Unit Development Agreement by and between the City of Medina and BPS Properties LLC Attachments 1. Draft Final Plat Resolution 2. Draft Easement Vacation Resolution 3. Draft Stormsewer Improvement Tax District Ordinance 4. Resolution authorizing publication by title and summary 5. Draft Development Agreement 6. Engineering Comments dated 4/15/2022 7. Depiction of Trail Easement locations 8. Plat 9. Plans Resolution No. 2022-## DATE Member ______ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2022-## RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR MARSH POINTE PRESERVE WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, BPS Properties, LLC (the “Applicant”) owns property at 4250-4292 Arrowhead Drive (the “BPS Property”), which is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City owns a 30-foot wide strip of land surrounded by the BPS Property (the “City Parcel”), which is legally described in Exhibit B, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Applicant intends to acquire the City Parcel to be included within the subdivision and development of the BPS Property; and WHEREAS, the BPS Property and City Parcel are collectively referred herein as the “Property;” and WHEREAS, on March 1, 2022 the City Council adopted Resolution 2022-15, granting planned unit development general plan and preliminary plat approval to subdivide and develop the Property into 30 detached single-family lots; and WHEREAS, on March 1, 2022, the City Council also adopted Ordinance No. 683, establishing a planned unit development district for Marsh Pointe Preserve, which was intended to regulate development upon the Property pursuant to the City’s Planned Unit Development regulations; and WHEREAS, on May 3, 2022, the City Council reviewed the plat for consistency with the approved preliminary plat and compliance with the terms and conditions of preliminary approval; and WHEREAS, upon review of the final plat the Council finds that, subject to certain terms and conditions, the plat is substantially consistent with the approved preliminary plat and the terms and conditions thereof, the requirements of the City’s subdivision regulations, and the requirements, terms and conditions of the underlying planned unit development district. Resolution No. 2022-## 2 DATE NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby grants final plat approval for Marsh Pointe Preserve, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1) The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include the conditions described below as well as other requirements of city ordinance or policy. 2) The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated March 30, 2022 except as may be modified herein. The Application shall updated to address the comments of the City Engineer, Fire Marshal, Elm Creek Watershed District, other relevant staff and agencies and the conditions noted herein. 3) The plat shall provide drainage and utility easements over all stormwater improvements, wetlands, and drainageways and along the perimeter of lots as recommended by the City Engineer, including, but not limited to, adding easements along the north, east, and west of Outlot B. 4) The Applicant shall meet the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance, including provision of easements, planting of vegetation and installation of signage. 5) Homes constructed within the PUD shall be consistent with the architectural requirements approved by the City Council at the time of final plat approval and as described in Ordinance 683. 6) Landscaping may be allowed within the right-of-way southeast of the intersection of Marsh Pointe Ct. and Arrowhead Drive if approved by City staff, but may be removed at any time if deemed necessary by the City, in its sole discretion. 7) The Applicant shall construct right turn improvements on Arrowhead Drive at the proposed intersection with Marsh Pointe Ct. as recommended by the City Engineer. 8) The Applicant’s construction plans anticipate sanitary sewer and watermain lines being extended from Arrowhead Drive to the Property as part of adjacent improvements being constructed to Arrowhead Drive by another party. If such improvements are not installed, the Applicant shall update the plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and shall be responsible to extend services to the Property. 9) The Applicant shall grant trail easements as recommended by City staff for the trails shown on the plans and for the two possible locations for an extension of the Diamond Lake Regional Trail as depicted in the staff report presented to the council on the date of this resolution. The Applicant shall pay a park dedication fee of $123,362 in lieu of additional land dedication. 10) The Applicant has represented to the City that it has agreements with the owners of parcels to the north of the Property related to the removal of dead trees and invasive species and installation of new landscaping that it has access to those parcels to perform the required work. Such work shall be included as required subdivision improvements in the development agreement. 11) Landscaping adjacent to the trail shall be installed in a way which does not interfere with maintenance of the trail when mature. 12) The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site improvements to ensure completion. 13) The Applicant shall execute and record a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney to describe the responsibility of the property owners to maintain the private stormwater improvements. Resolution No. 2022-## 3 DATE 14) The Property shall be subject to the City’s lawn and landscaping irrigation regulations. No lawn or landscape irrigation systems shall be permitted to be connected to the City water system. 15) The Applicant shall obtain all permits required by Elm Creek Watershed District, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council and any other relevant agencies. 16) The Applicant shall address the comments of the City Attorney with regard to the plat opinion, title matters and recording instructions. 17) The Applicant shall execute and record a declaration against the Property that meets the satisfaction of the City Attorney to ensure that no more trees are removed from the Property than what is otherwise authorized as part of the approved plans unless said trees are replaced as required by the City tree preservation ordinance. 18) The Applicant shall satisfy and otherwise adhere to all state and local flood protection requirements. 19) The Applicant shall, prior to recording the final plat, acquire from the City fee title to the City Parcel for $1,850, and such acquisition shall be consummated pursuant to terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney. The City hereby approves the lot split that is otherwise necessary to achieve such conveyance, and approves the sale of the Property for the aforementioned price and pursuant to the additional terms contained in the development agreement. 20) The plat shall be recorded with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles and Hennepin County Recorder within 180 days of the date of this resolution or the approval hereby granted shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council. 21) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the plat, construction plans, and other relevant documents. Dated: By: _______________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: By: ___________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _______ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2022-## 4 DATE EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the BPS Property The North 467 feet of the East 467 feet of the West 1122 feet (68 rods) of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota (Abstract) And Lot 1, Block 1,and Outlot B, Arrowhead Estates, according to the record thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (Abstract) And Par 1: That part of Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, including the accretions thereto, lying and being northwest of the centerline of Hennepin County Ditch No. 26 and the Northeasterly extension thereof and Northeast of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the east line of Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, 400 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Government Lot 4; thence West on a line parallel to the South line of said Government Lot 4 a distance of 1000 feet to a point; thence Northwest to the Northwest corner of said Government Lot 4, and there ending. Said Government Lot 4, including accretions thereto, being described as follows, to-wit; Government Lot 4, including the accretions to Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, all described as commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 2; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 24 minutes 35 seconds West, along the North and South centerline of said Section 2 a distance of 608.56 feet; thence South 6 degrees 47 minutes 43 seconds West, a distance of 817.18 feet; thence South 36 degrees 53 minutes East, a distance of 1040.00 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence North 36 degrees 53 minutes west, a distance of 500.00 feet; thence South 46 degrees 38 minutes 24 seconds West to the North line of said Government Lot 4; thence Westerly along said North line to the Northwest corner of said Government Lot 4; thence Southerly along the West line of said Government Lot 4 to the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 4; thence easterly along the South line of said Government Lot 4 to the Southeast corner of said Government Lot 4; thence Northerly along the North and South centerline of said Section 2, a distance of 1006.25 feet, more or less, to an intersection with a line bearing South 35 degrees 18 minutes 24 seconds West from the actual point of beginning; thence North 35 degrees 18 minutes 24 seconds East, 942.56 feet, more or less to the actual point of beginning. Par 2: The North 66 feet of the East 196.71 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Par 3: The North 66 feet of the following described part of Government Lot 4 as measured at right angles to and drawn parallel with the North line of said Government Lot 4; That part of Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, lying and being West of the following described line: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23; thence Northeast to a point 1000 feet West on a line drawn parallel to the South line of said Government Lot 4 from a point on the East line of said Government Lot 4, 400 feet North of the southeast corner of said Government Lot 4; thence Northwest to the Northwest corner of said Government Lot 4 and there ending. (Torrens Property) (Torrens Certificate No. 1361928) And Par 1: The East 196.71 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, except therefrom the North 66 feet thereof. Par 2: That part of Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, lying and being West of the following described line: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23; Resolution No. 2022-## 5 DATE thence Northeast to a point 1000 feet West on a line drawn parallel to the South line of said Government Lot 4 from a point on the East line of said Government Lot 4, 400 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Government Lot 4; thence Northwest to the Northwest corner of said Government Lot 4 and there ending, except therefrom the North 66 feet thereof, according to the Government Survey thereof. (Torrens Property) (Torrens Certificate No. 1072649) Resolution No. 2022-## 6 DATE Exhibit B Legal Description of the City Parcel That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying east of the West 1122.00 feet thereof and west of the East 196.71 feet thereof. (Abstract) Resolution No. 2022-## May 3, 2022 DOCSOPEN-ME230-774-792547.v1-4/19/22 Member ________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2022-## RESOLUTION VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AT 4250 ARROWHEAD DRIVE WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, BPS Properties, LLC (the “Owner”) owns property located at 4250 Arrowhead Drive (the “Property”), which is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, drainage and utility easements were dedicated to the public upon certain portions of the Property on the plat of Arrowhead Estates; and WHEREAS, the Owner has proposed to subdivide and develop the Property as part of the Marsh Pointe Preserve subdivision and proposes to dedicate necessary easements upon the new plat; and WHEREAS, the Owner has requested that the City vacate the easements which were previously dedicated upon the Property on the plat of Arrowhead Estates, subject to recordation of the Marsh Pointe Preserve plat which will dedicate new drainage and utility easements in necessary locations; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 462.358, subd. 7 and Minn. Stat. § 412.851, the City scheduled a public hearing to consider the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was posted, published in the official newspaper and mailed to the owners of affected properties, all in accordance with law; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed vacation on May 3, 2022 during which all interested parties were provided the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, following the public hearing, the City Council determined the following: 1) The drainage and utility easements within the Property as dedicated on the Arrowhead Estates plat will no longer be in the appropriate locations upon development and recordation of the Marsh Pointe Preserve plat. 2) The drainage and utility easements proposed to be dedicated on the Marsh Pointe Preserve plat better serve the public interest. 3) Subject to dedication of all required drainage and utility easements within the Marsh Pointe Preserve plat, vacation of the drainage and utility easements dedicated upon the Property on the Arrowhead Estates plat is in the public interest. Resolution No. 2022-## 2 May 3, 2022 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota as follows: 1. The drainage and utility easements upon the Property described and depicted in Exhibit B are hereby vacated, subject to recordation of the Marsh Pointe Preserve plat. 2. The city administrator or his designee is authorized and directed to prepare and present to the Hennepin County Auditor a notice that the City has completed these vacation proceedings and record with the Hennepin County Recorder the vacation of the easements described in Exhibit B. Such documentation shall be submitted and recorded in coordination with recordation of the Marsh Pointe Preserve plat. Dated: May 3, 2022. ______________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ________ upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2022-## 3 May 3, 2022 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot B, Arrowhead Estates, Hennepin County, Minnesota Resolution No. 2022-## 4 May 3, 2022 EXHIBIT B Legal Description of Vacated Easements All those drainage and utility easements, originally dedicated on the recorded plat of ARROWHEAD ESTATES, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and now to be vacated, which lie within Lot 1, Block 1, said plat. Ordinance No. ### 1 DATE CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. ### AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE MARSH POINTE PRESERVE STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT TAX DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Background: Findings. 1.01. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 444.16 – 444.21 (the “Act”) to establish a storm sewer improvement tax district within the Marsh Pointe Preserve development (the “District”) to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain and otherwise improve storm sewer systems and related facilities within the District and to acquire, construct, maintain and improve stormwater holding areas and ponds outside of the District which are for the benefit of the District in accordance with the Act and to levy a tax on all taxable property within the District to finance such activities. 1.02. It is found and determined that it is in the best interests of Medina and its storm water management program that the District be established. The District shall be comprised of the land legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto. Section II. Establishment: Authorizations. 2.01. The Marsh Pointe Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District is hereby established. The City shall have all powers and authority conferred by the Act in the operation and financing of the activities of the District. 2.02. The boundaries of the District include all property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and are depicted in the map on Exhibit B, attached hereto. 2.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the Auditor and Registrar of Titles, and Recorder of Hennepin County. Section III. This ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and publication and the recording of the plat of Marsh Pointe Preserve in Hennepin County. Ordinance No. ### 2 DATE Adopted by the City Council of the City of Medina this _____ day of _______, 2022 Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: _____________________________________ Caitlyn Walker Published in the Crow River News on this _____ day of ____________, 2022. Ordinance No. ### DATE 3 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of property contained within boundaries of the Marsh Pointe Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District Lot 1, Block 1, Lots 1-3, Block 2, Lots 1-15, Block 3, Lot 4, Block 4, Lots 1-10, Block 5, Outlots A, B, C, and D, Marsh Pointe Preserve, Hennepin County, Minnesota Ordinance No. ### DATE 4 EXHIBIT B Location of Marsh Pointe Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District Resolution No. 2022-## May 3, 2022 Member ________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2022-## RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NOS. ### AND ### BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance establishing the Marsh Pointe Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statues § 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publications by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and WHEREAS, the ordinance is four pages in length and contains a map; and WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina that the city clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. ### to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the ordinance in its entirety: Public Notice The city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance establishing the Marsh Pointe Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District. The tax district applies to the property within the Marsh Pointe Preserve plat and development and would allow the City to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain and otherwise improve storm sewer systems and related facilities related to the District and to levy a tax on all taxable property within the District to finance such activities. The full text of the ordinance is available from the city clerk at Medina city hall during regular business hours. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina that the city clerk keep a copy of the ordinances in their office at city hall for public inspection and that they post a full copy of the ordinances in a public place within the city. Resolution No. 2022-## 2 May 3, 2022 Dated: May 3, 2022. ______________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ________ upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 787877.v4 DRAFT 4/28/22 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MEDINA AND BPS PROPERTIES, LLC FOR MARSH POINTE PRESERVE This document drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 i 787877.v4 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. Zoning; Adherence to General Plan .............................................................................................. 1 2. Right to Proceed ............................................................................................................................ 2 3. Plans; Improvements ..................................................................................................................... 2 4. Erosion Control ............................................................................................................................. 3 5. Site Grading; Haul Routes ............................................................................................................ 4 6. Construction of Improvements ..................................................................................................... 4 7. Public Street Improvements .......................................................................................................... 5 8. Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements ..................................................................................... 6 9. Stormwater Improvements ............................................................................................................ 6 10. Landscaping Plan; Landscape Irrigation System; Tree Removal ................................................. 7 11. Wetlands; Upland Buffer Easement Agreement ........................................................................... 8 12. Street Lighting and Signs .............................................................................................................. 8 13. Trails and Sidewalks ..................................................................................................................... 8 14. Conveyance of City Property ........................................................................................................ 8 15. Letter of Credit .............................................................................................................................. 9 16. Homeowners’ Association .......................................................................................................... 10 17. City Trunk Connection Rates; SAC Fees ................................................................................... 10 18. Park Dedication Requirements ................................................................................................... 11 19. Responsibility for Costs; Escrow for Construction Inspection ................................................... 11 20. Developer’s Default .................................................................................................................... 11 21. Insurance ..................................................................................................................................... 12 22. Floodplain Regulations ............................................................................................................... 12 23. No Building Permits Approved; Certificates of Occupancy ....................................................... 12 24. Clean up and Dust Control .......................................................................................................... 12 25. Compliance with Laws ............................................................................................................... 13 26. Agreement Runs with the Land .................................................................................................. 13 27. Indemnification ........................................................................................................................... 13 28. Assignment ................................................................................................................................. 13 29. Notices ........................................................................................................................................ 13 30. Severability ................................................................................................................................. 14 31. Non-waiver ................................................................................................................................. 14 32. Counterparts ................................................................................................................................ 14 SIGNATURES .......................................................................................................................................... 15-16 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY EXHIBIT B LIST OF PLAN DOCUMENTS EXHIBIT C FORM OF STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT EXHIBIT D FORM OF TREE PROTECTION DECLARATION EXHIBIT E FORM OF UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT EXHIBIT F FORM OF TRAIL EASEMENT EXHIBIT G FORM OF QUIT CLAIM DEED EXHIBIT H IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE 1 787877.v4 This Planned Unit Development Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ____ day of ______________, 2022, by and between the city of Medina, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota (the “City”), and BPS Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer is fee owner of the real property legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Developer previously submitted an application for approval to rezone the Property to Planned Unit Development and for approval of a preliminary plat and PUD General Plan of Development to accommodate a 30-unit detached villa development (the “Development”); and WHEREAS, on March 1, 2022, the City conditionally rezoned the Property to Planned Unit Development via Ordinance No. 683 and granted conditional approval of a preliminary plat and corresponding PUD General Plan of Development (the “General Plan”) via Resolution No. 2022-15; and WHEREAS, on May 3, 2022, the City approved the final plat of Marsh Pointe Preserve (the “Subdivision”) via Resolution 2022-___; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 683, Resolution No. 2022-15, and Resolution 2022-_____ shall be collectively referred to herein as the “City Approvals”; and WHEREAS, the City Approvals are contingent upon the Developer entering into a planned unit development agreement satisfactory to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the mutual covenants and obligations contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Zoning; Adherence to General Plan. a) Subject to execution of this Agreement and all other conditions contained in the City Approvals, the Property has been zoned Planned Unit Development and may be developed in accordance with the General Plan. Approval of the flexibility from the City’s zoning ordinance contemplated within the General Plan is strictly conditioned upon the Developer’s compliance with all terms and conditions of the City Approvals and this Agreement. b) Adherence to the City Approvals involves restrictions on the Developer’s ability to use and develop the Property. The Developer has carefully reviewed the City’s planned unit development ordinance and the terms and conditions of the City Approvals and understands the limitations on the use and development of the Property that such regulations and approvals impose. The Developer has knowingly and willingly agreed to be bound by such regulations and approvals because it has concluded it is in its best interests to see the Property developed pursuant to such regulations and approvals. 2. Right to Proceed. The Developer may not construct public or private improvements or any buildings on the Property until all of the following conditions precedent have been satisfied: 2 787877.v4 a) this Agreement has been executed by the Developer and the City; b) the required Letter of Credit (as hereinafter defined) has been received by the City from or on behalf of the Developer; c) final engineering and construction plans in digital form regarding the Improvements (as hereinafter defined) have been submitted by the Developer and approved by the City engineer; d) the Developer has reimbursed the City for all legal, engineering and administrative expenses incurred to date by the City regarding the Development and has deposited with the City the additional inspection escrow required by this Agreement; e) the Developer has amended the Plans to accommodate right turns into the Development from Arrowhead Drive, as required in section 7c of this Agreement, and said amendment has been approved in writing by the City engineer; f) the Developer has executed a stormwater maintenance agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C; g) the Developer has executed a tree preservation declaration substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D; h) the Developer has executed an upland buffer easement agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit E; i) the Developer has executed a trail easement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F; j) the Developer has submitted and the City has approved the certified grading plan; k) all erosion control measures are in place; l) the Developer has received all required permits from the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Metropolitan Council, and any other entity having jurisdiction over the Development; m) the Developer or the Developer’s engineer has initiated and attended a preconstruction meeting with the City engineer and staff; and n) the City has issued a notice that all conditions precedent have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed to construct the improvements contemplated by this Agreement. 3. Plans; Improvements. a) The Developer agrees to construct the Development in accordance with the terms and conditions of the City Approvals, which are hereby fully incorporated by reference into this Agreement and made a part hereof, and to construct all required improvements in accordance with the approved engineering and construction plans (collectively, the “Plans”) and this Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the City Approvals and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control. The documents which constitute the Plans are those on file with and approved by the City and are listed on Exhibit B attached hereto. The Plans may not be modified by the Developer without the prior written approval of the City or except as expressly provided in this Agreement. 3 787877.v4 b) In constructing the Development in accordance with the Plans, the Developer shall make or install at its sole expense the following public and private improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”): 1. site grading and floodplain work; 2. public street and sidewalk improvements; 3. public trail and parking improvements; 4. sanitary sewer; 5. municipal water distribution system; 6. stormwater facilities; and 7. on-site and off-site landscaping. c) All work performed by or on behalf of the Developer on or related to the Development, including construction of the Improvements and the dwellings and related improvements, shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m. on Saturday. 4. Erosion Control. a) All construction regarding the Improvements shall be conducted in a manner designed to control erosion and in compliance with all City ordinances and other requirements, including the City’s permit with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding municipal separate storm sewer system program. Before any portion of the Property is rough graded, an erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer as approved by the City. The City may impose reasonable, additional erosion control requirements after the City’s initial approval if the City deems such necessary due to a change in conditions. All areas disturbed by the excavation shall be reseeded promptly after the completion of the work in that area unless construction of streets or utilities, buildings or other improvements is anticipated immediately thereafter. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. b) If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems reasonably appropriate to control erosion based on the urgency of the situation. The City agrees to provide reasonable notice to the Developer in advance of any proposed action, including notice by telephone or email in the case of emergencies, but limited notice by the City when conditions so dictate will not affect the Developer’s obligations or the City’s rights hereunder. c) The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all expenses it incurs in connection with any action it takes to control erosion. No grading or construction of the Improvements will be allowed and no building permits will be issued within the Development unless the Developer is in full compliance with the erosion control requirements. The erosion control measures specified in the Plans or otherwise required within the Property or adjacent areas shall be binding on the Developer and its successors and assigns. 5. Site Grading; Haul Routes. a) In order to construct the Improvements and otherwise prepare the land for development, it will be necessary for the Developer to grade the 4 787877.v4 Property. All site grading must be done in compliance with the Plans and the requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding contaminated soils. The City may withhold issuance of building permits for structures within the Development until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City. Within 30 days after completion of the grading, the Developer shall provide the City with an “as constructed” grading plan and a certification by a registered land surveyor or engineer. b) The Developer agrees that equipment, materials, and any fill material which must be brought to or removed from the Property or adjacent areas while grading or during construction of the Improvements or any buildings within the Development will be transported using the haul route established by the City and will not be transported on any City street unless designated and approved by the City in writing. The City designates the haul route as Arrowhead Drive to T.H. 55. 6. Construction of Improvements. a) All Improvements shall be installed in accordance with the Plans, the City Approvals, the General Plan, this Agreement, City ordinances, the City’s engineering standards (as hereinafter defined) for utility construction and the requirements of the report from the City engineer dated __________________, 2022. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications for the Improvements prepared by a registered professional engineer. The Developer shall obtain any necessary permits from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission and any other agency having jurisdiction before proceeding with construction. The City shall inspect all work at the Developer’s expense. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City’s inspectors. Prior to beginning construction, the Developer or the Developer’s engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting with all parties concerned, including the City staff and engineers, to review the program for the construction work. b) Within 45 days after the completion of the Improvements, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible “as constructed” plans and three complete sets of paper “as constructed” plans, each prepared in accordance with City standards and in AutoCADD format based on Hennepin County coordinates. Sanitary sewer, water and stormwater “as constructed” plans shall also be submitted to the City in GIS format compatible with ArcMap 10 in the coordinates and with the attributes directed by the City Engineer. Except as otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement, the Improvements shall be completed by no later than November 30, 2022. c) The Developer agrees to require its contractor to provide to the City a warranty bond for the public streets, sanitary sewer, and municipal water distribution system to cover defects in labor and materials for a period of two years from the date of their acceptance by the City or from their completion if they are not to be dedicated to the City. During such period, the Developer agrees to repair or replace any Improvement, or portion or element thereof, which shows signs of failure, normal wear and tear excepted. A decision regarding whether an Improvement shows signs of failure shall be made by the City in the reasonable exercise of its judgment. If the Developer fails to repair or replace a defective Improvement during the warranty period after prior written notice to Developer and opportunity to cure as provided in section 20 of this Agreement, the City may repair or replace the defective portion and may use the Letter of Credit, as hereinafter 5 787877.v4 defined, to reimburse itself for such costs. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City fully for the cost of all Improvement repairs or replacement if the cost thereof exceeds the remaining amount of the Letter of Credit. Such reimbursement must be made within 45 days of the date upon which the City notifies the Developer of the cost due under this section. If the Developer fails to make required payments to the City, the Developer hereby consents to the City levying special assessments against the Property in the amount of such required reimbursement, provided, however, it does not exceed the amount required for the Letter of Credit. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges the benefit to the Property of the repair or replacement of the Improvements and hereby consents to such assessment and waives the right to a hearing or notice of hearing or any appeal thereon under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. 7. Public Street Improvements. a) The Developer agrees to construct the public streets internal to the Subdivision and on Arrowhead Drive, as provided in section 7c) below, all in accordance with the City’s street specifications, the Plans, and this Agreement. The City’s street specifications are contained in the most recent edition of its engineering standards (the “Engineering Standards”), which is hereby incorporated into this Agreement by reference. If there is a conflict between the Plans and the Engineering Standards, the Engineering Standards shall prevail except when an alternative has been explicitly approved in writing by the City. b) The street construction required above shall be completed by no later than the date for completion of all Improvements, except that the final wear course of bituminous on the internal streets shall not be completed until after (i) the full completion of 80 percent of the dwellings (24 dwellings) within the Subdivision; and (ii) one freeze-thaw cycle occurs following the completion of the initial street improvements, i.e. everything except for final wear course. Notwithstanding the above, the City reserves the right to require installation of the wear course on the internal streets whenever, at its sole discretion, it deems that to be in the public interest. In no event, however, shall the Developer be required to install the final wear course of bituminous between the days of November 1 and May 31. The Developer shall also repair or replace any broken or failing curbs and sidewalks at the time of installation of the final wear course of bituminous. c) The City engineer has determined it necessary for the Developer to better accommodate right turns into the Development from Arrowhead Drive, which as of the date of this Agreement is not included in the Plans. As a condition of the Developer’s right to proceed, the Plans shall be amended to include such improvements, and said amendment shall be reviewed and approved in writing by the City engineer. Upon such approval by the City engineer, the amendment shall by operation of contract become incorporated into the Plans and all terms and conditions of this Agreement regarding the Plans shall be interpreted to include said amendment. Notwithstanding the November 30, 2022 completion deadline for the Improvements, the final wear course associated with any required street improvements on Arrowhead Drive shall not be installed until one freeze-thaw cycle occurs. Said final wear course shall be installed no later than July 1, 2023. d) Following full completion of the public street improvements and the inspection thereof by the city engineer, the City agrees to accept said streets for maintenance if they have been constructed according to City specifications, including the Engineering Standards and the Plans. All maintenance, including snow and ice removal, shall remain the Developer’s responsibility until such acceptance. 6 787877.v4 8. Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements. The Developer agrees to construct sanitary sewer and water improvements to serve the Development. The Developer’s work in constructing and extending the utilities must be in accordance with the Plans and must comply with all City requirements regarding such utilities. All extensions of sanitary sewer main within public right-of-way will be dedicated by the Developer to the City as public improvements upon completion and acceptance by the City. Additionally, the water main extensions within public right-of-way, as shown on the Plans, will be dedicated by the Developer to the City as public improvements upon completion and acceptance by the City. The Plans presently anticipate sanitary sewer and watermain being extended from Arrowhead Drive to the Development in connection with adjacent improvements that are to be constructed by another party. Depending on timing, the Developer may update the Plans, as defined herein, to accommodate such extensions for review and approval by the City engineer, and if duly approved shall be responsible to perform that work as part of the Improvements. Authorization to perform any utility Improvements on the Property will not be provided by the City unless and until sufficient provisions and assurances are in place for said utilities to connect to City mains, in the City’s sole discretion. 9. Stormwater Improvements. a) The Developer agrees to construct the stormwater facilities in accordance with the Plans and in compliance with all City requirements regarding such improvements. The stormwater facilities include, but are not limited to, wet ponds and all related facilities, all as shown on the Plans. b) Except for those located within public right-of-way, the stormwater facilities serving the Subdivision will remain private and will be maintained by the Developer at its sole expense until taken over by the HOA, as hereinafter defined. The City does not intend to accept such stormwater facilities as public and does not intend to maintain them. In order to meet the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission and City code, the Developer agrees to enter into a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement with the City in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C. The purpose of the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement is to ensure that the Developer maintains the stormwater facilities until taken over by the HOA and to give the City the right but not the obligation to do so if the Developer fails in its obligations. The Stormwater Maintenance Agreement will be recorded against all land within the Subdivision and will run with the land. The Developer acknowledges that i) the stormwater facilities have not and will not be accepted by the City; ii) the City does not plan to maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or replacement of the stormwater facilities and that the Developer and ultimately the HOA will have primary responsibility for such work at the direction of the City; iii) the City has the right but not the obligation to perform necessary inspections, monitoring and maintenance; and iv) if the City performs any maintenance work on the stormwater facilities after reasonable notice to the Developer or HOA and the failure of the Developer or HOA to perform the work, as required, the City intends to specially assess the cost of such work against the lots within the Subdivision and other portions of the Property. Notwithstanding the above, the City will accept and maintain those elements of the stormwater facilities which are located on public rights-of-way. c) The Developer will make the HOA responsible for the maintenance, repair or replacement of the stormwater facilities as needed and the HOA documents recorded with Hennepin County shall so require. The HOA shall be responsible for the maintenance, repair or replacement of all stormwater facilities serving any portion of the Property regardless of whether located in the first or future phases of the project. The Developer agrees to inform purchasers of 7 787877.v4 lots within the Subdivision that i) the City does not plan to maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or replacement of the stormwater facilities and that the HOA will have primary responsibility for such work; ii) the City has the right but not the obligation to perform necessary work upon the failure or refusal by the HOA to do so; and iii) if the City performs any work on the stormwater facilities after reasonable notice to the Developer or HOA and the failure of the Developer or HOA to perform the work, the City intends to recover the cost of such work against the lots within the Subdivision. d) The Developer acknowledges that the City intends to establish a storm sewer improvement tax district which includes all land within the Subdivision. The district will be established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 444.16 to 444.21 and will authorize the City to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain, and otherwise improve storm sewer systems and related improvements within or serving the Subdivision if such work becomes necessary in the opinion of the City. In recognition of this possibility, the Developer agrees to provide prospective lot purchasers with a disclosure statement informing them of the existence of the storm sewer improvement tax district and that a tax could be imposed on the lots within the Subdivision if the City is required to repair or maintain the storm sewer systems and related improvements. The wording of the disclosure statement must be approved by the City for use in connection with the sale of lots in the Subdivision prior to its distribution or use by the Developer. 10. Landscaping Plan; Landscape Irrigation Plan; Tree Removal. a) The Developer agrees to install landscaping in accordance with the Plans, which shall include all tree replacement requirements as provided in the City’s tree replacement ordinance, to the extent applicable, and both on- and off-site grading and plantings (the off-site work is located on portions of private property to the north of the Subdivision). All landscaping shall include hardy, non-invasive and drought tolerant species appropriate for Minnesota. All landscaping materials shall be maintained and replaced if they die within two years of installation. b) Any automatic water irrigation system utilized on the Property shall be equipped with rain sensors or soil moisture sensors and is subject to the City’s irrigation ordinance and water conservation ordinance which prohibits the use of treated municipal water in connection with landscape irrigation systems. Notwithstanding the aforementioned prohibition regarding water irrigation systems, water may be utilized from the public water system for a limited period of time until the landscaping material within the Subdivision has been established. The Developer will submit the plans for the irrigation system prior to any permit being issued for any structures within the Subdivision. c) Any tree removal on the Property beyond what is contained in the Plans is subject to replacement or fees in accordance with the City’s tree preservation ordinance. The Developer agrees to execute and record a tree preservation declaration by separate instrument in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D. Additionally, during construction of the Improvements and any structures on the Property, the Developer shall place signage on the Property regarding the limitations on tree removal. 11. Wetlands; Upland Buffer Easement Agreement. The Developer must meet the requirements of the approved wetland replacement plan. The Developer agrees to execute the Upland Buffer Easement Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit E. The purpose of the 8 787877.v4 Upland Buffer Easement Agreement is to enhance water quality in the wetlands, provide that no structures or fill are placed in those areas and ensure that they are maintained in such condition thereafter. The Developer agrees to make the HOA responsible for its maintenance obligations under the Upland Buffer Easement Agreement and the HOA documents recorded with Hennepin County will so require. 12. Street Lighting and Signs. The Developer agrees to install street lighting and street signs in accordance with the Plans and at its sole cost. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Developer shall submit lighting details to the City for review and approval by City staff. All lighting shall meet City standards. Street lighting shall include lighting fixtures approved by the City and shall be equipped with luminaries which allow no light more than five percent above the horizontal plane. Street signs shall be of a design approved by the City and those located along public right-of-way shall be dedicated by the Developer to the City after installation and acceptance by the City. 13. Trails and Sidewalks. All trails and sidewalks will be public and shall be constructed by the Developer in accordance with the Plans. Additionally, the Developer shall execute a trail easement in the general form attached hereto as Exhibit F, which accommodates (i) the trail located through the north side of Block 2; and (ii) a future public trail through other portions of the Property. It is expressly understood that the exact location of said future public trail, which may serve as an extension of Three River’s Park District’s Diamond Lake Trail, is presently unknown. For that reason, the trail easement larger than might otherwise be required if the location was now known, and the City retains the statutory right to vacate portions of said easement in the future should it need to be confined. 14. Conveyance of City Parcel. a) The plat contains a strip of real property located within the Subdivision that, as of the date of final plat approval, the City owns in fee (the “City Parcel”). The City Parcel is legally described in that certain Conveyance of Forfeited Lands, dated February 13, 2019 and recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder’s Office as Document No. A10642532. The Developer desires to purchase the City Parcel prior to recording the plat in accordance with this section 14. The Developer has reviewed a title commitment for the City Parcel, has performed any desired inspections, and makes no objections as to condition of title or physical condition of the City Parcel. b) The City agrees to sell the City Parcel to the Developer for $1,850.00 and, upon receipt of said purchase price and the Developer’s adherence to all conditions precedent to the City’s release of the final plat of Marsh Pointe Preserve, the City agrees to convey title and possession of the City Parcel by quit claim deed, in the general form attached hereto as Exhibit G. Upon payment to the City of the purchase price and any other conditions precedent contained herein, the City shall execute and deliver to the Developer (i) a quit claim deed conveying title to the City Parcel to the Developer; and (ii) such other documents as may be reasonably required by the Developer’s title examiner or title insurance company to effectuate said conveyance. The quit claim deed shall be recorded immediately prior to the final plat and in strict conformance with any other City recording instructions. c) The Developer shall be solely responsible for and pay: (i) the premium for any title insurance policy related to the City Parcel and the cost of any endorsements desired by the 9 787877.v4 Developer; (ii) recording fees and deed tax required to enable the Developer to record its deed from the City for the City Parcel; (iii) any survey, inspection, and investigation fees that are incurred by the Developer in its investigation of the City Parcel; (iv) its own attorneys’ fees associated with the conveyance of the City Parcel to the Developer; (v) the cost of the title commitment and any title search and examination fees. d) The Developer acknowledges that it has inspected or has had the opportunity to inspect the City Parcel and agrees to accept it “AS IS” with no right of set off or reduction in the purchase price. Such sale shall be without representation of warranties, express or implied, either oral or written, made by the City or any official, employee or agent of the City with respect to the physical condition of the Property, including but not limited to, the existence or absence of petroleum, hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants in, on, or under, or affecting the City Parcel, or with respect to the compliance of the City Parcel or its operation with any laws, ordinances, or regulations of any government or other body. The Developer acknowledges and agrees that the City has not made and does not make any representations, warranties, or covenants of any kind or character whatsoever, whether expressed or implied, warranty with respect to the safety of the City Parcel, of income potential, operating expenses, uses, habitability, tenant ability, or suitability for any purpose, merchantability, or fitness of the City Parcel for a particular purpose, all of which warranties the City hereby expressly disclaims. 15. Letter of Credit. a) In order to ensure completion of the Improvements required under this Agreement and satisfaction of all fees due to the City, the Developer agrees to deliver to the City prior to the issuance of any City permits related to the Development, a letter of credit (the “Letter of Credit”) in the amount of $1,144,996.80 which represents 150 percent of the estimated cost of the Improvements as specified in the Plans. This amount represents the maximum risk exposure for the City, with careful consideration of the Improvements that will eventually be publicly owned, and is based on the anticipated sequence of construction and the estimate of cost of each element of the Improvements rather than the aggregate cost of all required Improvements. The Letter of Credit shall be delivered to the City prior to beginning any work on the Improvements and shall renew automatically thereafter until released by the City. The estimated cost of the work covered by the Letter of Credit is itemized on Exhibit H attached hereto. The Letter of Credit shall be issued by a bank determined by the City to be solvent and creditworthy and shall be in a form acceptable to the City. The Letter of Credit shall allow the City to draw upon the instrument, in whole or part, in order to complete construction of any or all of the Improvements and other specified work within the Development and to pay any fees or costs due to the City by the Developer after written notice to Developer and Developer’s failure to cure the default within a reasonable period. b) The City agrees to reduce the Letter of Credit to an amount roughly equal to 150 percent of the cost of the remaining work, subject to evaluation of the City’s maximum risk exposure, delivery of the required warranty bond to the City and satisfaction of all of the Developer’s financial obligations to the City. The Letter of Credit shall be released in full and returned to the Developer following installation of the final wear course of bituminous on the street; expiration of the aforementioned two-year warranty period; after satisfaction of all financial obligations by the Developer to the City; and after completion of all other requirements of this section. Prior to releasing any portion of the Letter of Credit or accepting another letter of credit in replacement, the City shall first be satisfied regarding the quality and completeness of the work 10 787877.v4 and that the Developer has taken such steps as may be necessary to ensure that no liens will attach to the Development. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Letter of Credit shall not be reduced to less than $50,000, until such time as the City releases the entire Letter of Credit. c) It is the intention of the parties that the City at all times have available to it a Letter of Credit in an amount adequate to ensure completion of all elements of the Improvements and other obligations of the Developer under this Agreement. To that end and notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, all requests by the Developer for a reduction or release of the Letter of Credit shall be evaluated by the City in light of that principle. d) If at any time the City reasonably determines that the bank issuing the Letter of Credit no longer satisfies the City’s requirements regarding solvency and creditworthiness, the City shall notify the Developer and the Developer shall provide to the City within 30 days a substitute Letter of Credit from another bank meeting the City’s requirements. If within 30 days of notice the Developer fails to provide the City with a substitute Letter of Credit from an issuing bank satisfactory to the City, the City may draw under the existing Letter of Credit. 16. Homeowners’ Association. a) The Developer agrees to establish a homeowners’ association (the “HOA”), which shall include all land within the Subdivision. The Developer agrees to record covenants against said land for this purpose, which covenants must be in form and substance acceptable to the City. The covenants shall be filed by the Developer with Hennepin County prior to any building permits being issued for the Subdivision. b) The HOA covenants must provide, among other things, for HOA maintenance of the stormwater facilities, upland buffers, the landscape irrigation system (if any) and all common areas in the Subdivision. The City must approve the HOA covenants and will require that certain provisions thereof may not be amended or deleted without prior written City approval. 17. City Trunk Connection Rates; SAC Fees. a) In accordance with City policy and to distribute uniformly the costs of public utility infrastructure improvements, the City will charge the Developer trunk connection fees for the availability of sanitary sewer and water to the Property. The rates are typically adjusted annually. The trunk connection fees for sanitary sewer and water shall be payable at the time of issuance of each building permit at the then-current rates. b) The Metropolitan Council also charges the City a sewer availability charge for each new connection to the metropolitan sanitary sewer disposal system or increase in capacity demand. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for any sewer availability charge paid by the City to the Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council’s current rate is $2,485.00 per unit. 18. Park Dedication Requirements. In order to satisfy the City’s park dedication requirements with respect to the Subdivision, the Developer shall pay to the City a cash-in-lieu amount of $123,362 prior to the City’s execution and release of the final plat. 19. Responsibility for Costs; Escrow for Construction Inspection. a) The Developer agrees to pay to the City an administrative fee in the amount necessary to reimburse the City for its reasonable costs and expenses in reviewing the Development, including the drafting and negotiation of this Agreement. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City in full for such reasonable 11 787877.v4 costs within 45 days after notice in writing by the City. The Developer further agrees to reimburse the City for the reasonable cost incurred in the enforcement of any provision of this Agreement, including reasonable engineering and attorneys’ fees. b) The Developer shall also pay a fee for City construction observation and administration relating to construction of the Improvements. Construction observation shall include inspection of all the Improvements. In order to reimburse the City for the reasonable cost of inspection of the Improvements, the Developer shall deposit an additional $61,000 into an escrow account with the City, which shall receive and hold such funds solely under the terms of this Agreement. The City shall reimburse itself for expenses from the escrow and will provide the Developer with a copy of any invoice from the city engineer or evidence of other cost or expense attributed to the escrow prior to deducting such funds from the escrow. If any funds held under this escrow exceed the amount necessary to reimburse the City for its costs under this section, such funds shall be returned to the Developer without interest. If it appears that the actual costs incurred will exceed the estimate, the Developer and the City shall review the costs required to complete the project and the Developer shall deposit additional sums with the City. 20. Developer’s Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to construction or repair of any of the Improvements or any other work or undertaking required by this Agreement (“Event of Default”), and such Event of Default continues for 30 days after the City provides notice to the Developer of the nature of the default pursuant to the notice requirements in this Agreement, or if such default cannot be cured within 30 days, after such time period as may be reasonably required to cure the default provided that Developer is making a good faith effort to cure said default, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek an order from any court for permission to enter the Property for such purposes. If the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, levy special assessments against the Property to recover the costs thereof, provided, however, that it does not exceed the total Letter of Credit amount specified in section 13. For this purpose, the Developer, for itself and its successors and assigns, expressly waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments, including but not limited to, hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the land so assessed. The Developer, for itself and its successors and assigns, also waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 429.081. 21. Insurance. The Developer agrees to take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six months after the City has accepted the Improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer’s work or the work of its contractors or subcontractors. Liability limits shall not be less than $500,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful act or omission or for any other claim and $1,500,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy. The certificate of insurance shall provide that the City must be given the same advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance as is afforded to the Developer. 22. Floodplain Regulations. No structures, including fences and accessory structures, may be constructed within the Subdivision below the regulatory flood protection elevation. The 12 787877.v4 Developer must comply with the requirements of the City with regard to flood protection. Any utilities which are installed by the Developer on ground the surface of which is below the regulatory flood protection elevation must be flood proof in accordance with the state building code and City requirements. Additionally, all required work within the floodplain, including filling in existing floodplain, along with the excavation required to provide compensatory floodplain storage, shall be completed by the Developer in accordance with the Plans. 23. No Building Permits Approved; Certificates of Occupancy. a) Approvals granted to date by the City regarding the Development do not include approval of a building permit for any structure. The Developer must submit and the City must approve building plans prior to an application for a building permit for a structure on any lot within the Development. All building pads must be certified prior to initiation of construction of a home on a lot. The Developer or the party applying for a building permit shall be responsible for payment of the customary fees associated with the building permit and all other deferred fees as specified in this Agreement. b) No building permit shall be issued for any structure within the Development until all streets, except for the final wear course of bituminous, and all utilities have been completed. c) No certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any structure unless prior thereto the lot has been graded and all landscaping installed in accordance with the Plans, the driveway and parking has been installed, the footing drain tile or sump pump is discharging in an approved location, the water service valve is in proper working order and an as built survey has been submitted and approved by the City. In cases in which seasonal weather conditions make compliance with these conditions impossible, the City may accept an escrow of sufficient amount to ensure completion of the work during the following construction season. 24. Clean up and Dust Control. The Developer shall clean on a daily basis dirt and debris from streets within and adjoining the Development resulting from construction work by the Developer, its contractors, agents or assigns. Prior to any construction on the Property or adjacent areas, the Developer shall identify to the City in writing a responsible party for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. The Developer shall provide dust control to the satisfaction of the City’s engineer throughout construction of the Development. 25. Compliance with Laws. The Developer agrees to comply with all laws, resolutions, ordinances, regulations and directives of the state of Minnesota and the City applicable to the Development. This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of Minnesota. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall, among other remedies available to the City, be grounds for denial of building permits on the Property. 26. Agreement Runs with the Land. This Agreement shall run with the Property and shall be recorded against the title thereto and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the City and the Developer and their successors and assigns. The Developer’s successors in title may be responsible for certain obligations under this Agreement as required by the City. Upon request by Developer or its successors or assigns, the City will issue a certificate in recordable form which certifies the extent which the Developer is in compliance with the terms of this Agreement, and if Developer has fully complied with and completed all terms of this Agreement, releasing Developer from this Agreement. As of the date hereof, the Developer warrants that to Developer’s actual 13 787877.v4 knowledge, there are no unrecorded encumbrances or interests relating to the Property. The Developer agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. 27. Indemnification. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred to the extent arising from a breach of this Agreement by the Developer or any negligent or intentional act or omission of the Developer. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys’ fees, except matters involving intentional acts or gross negligence by the City. 28. Assignment. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the prior written permission of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or denied. 29. Notices. Any notice or correspondence to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed to be given if delivered personally or sent by United States certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested: a) as to Developer: BPS Properties, LLC ________________________ ________________________ Attn: ________________________ b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attention: City Administrator with a copy to: Ronald H. Batty Kennedy & Graven 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this section. The Developer shall notify the City if there is any change in its name or address. 30. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall pertain only to such section and shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other section or provision of this Agreement. 31. Non-waiver. Each right, power or remedy conferred upon the City by this Agreement is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, or available to the City at law or in equity, or under any other agreement. 14 787877.v4 Each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. If either party waives in writing any default or nonperformance by the other party, such waiver shall be deemed to apply only to such event and shall not waive any other prior or subsequent default. 32. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original and shall constitute one and the same Agreement. ********************* 15 787877.v4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written. CITY OF MEDINA By: __________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor By: __________________________________ Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2022, by Kathleen Martin, the mayor of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2022, by Scott T. Johnson, the city administrator of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public 16 787877.v4 THE DEVELOPER: By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 2022, by __________________, the ______________________ of BPS Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of said entity. ____________________________________ Notary Public This document drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 A-1 787877.v4 EXHIBIT A TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Property Lot 1, Block 1, Lots 1 through 3, Block 2, Lots 1 through 15, Block 3, Lot 1, Block 4, Lots 1 through 10, Block 5, and Outlots A through E, all in Marsh Pointe Preserve, Hennepin County, Minnesota. B-1 787877.v4 EXHIBIT B TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT List of Plan Documents [to be inserted] C-1 787877.v4 EXHIBIT C TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the ____ day of _________, 2022, by and between the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”) and BPS Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer is the fee owner of certain real property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the City has obtained drainage and utility easements over portions of the Property (the “Easement Areas”); and WHEREAS, by a separate planned unit development agreement (the “PUD Agreement”), the Developer has agreed to construct and maintain certain stormwater facilities (the “Stormwater Improvements”) for the benefit of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Stormwater Improvements which are the subject of this Agreement include storm sewer wet ponds and all related facilities, except for any stormwater improvements that are located within public right-of-way. The location of the Stormwater Improvements are shown on Exhibit B attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission requires permanent provisions for handling of storm runoff, including terms and conditions for operation and maintenance of all Stormwater Improvements, and requires such provisions to be set forth in an agreement to be recorded against the Property; and WHEREAS, the City and the Developer intend to comply with certain conditions, including entering into a maintenance agreement regarding the Stormwater Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants of the parties set forth herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements. The Developer, for itself and its successor or assigns, agrees to maintain the Stormwater Improvements and observe all drainage laws governing the operation and maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements. The Developer shall make periodic inspection and perform maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements as described in Exhibit C attached hereto. The Developer shall make all such scheduled inspections and maintenance, keep record of all inspections and maintenance activities, and submit such records annually to the City. The cost of all inspections and maintenance shall be the obligation C-2 787877.v4 of the Developer and its successors or assigns as the fee owner of the Property. 2. City’s Rights. The City may inspect and monitor the Stormwater Improvements at any time and shall have the right to enter upon the Easement Areas and such portions of the Property as may reasonably be necessary to gain access to the Easement Areas to perform such inspections and monitoring. Additionally, the City may maintain the Stormwater Improvements, as provided in this paragraph, if the City reasonably believes that the Developer or its successors or assigns has failed to maintain the Stormwater Improvements in accordance with applicable drainage laws and other requirements and such failure continues for 30 days after the City gives the Developer written notice of such failure or, if such tasks cannot be completed within 30 days, after such time period as may be reasonably required to complete the required tasks provided that Developer is making a good faith effort to complete said task. The City’s notice shall specifically state which maintenance tasks are to be performed. If Developer does not complete the maintenance tasks within the required time period after such notice is given by the City, the City shall have the right to enter upon the Easement Areas and such portions of the Property as may reasonably be necessary to gain access to the Easement Areas to perform such maintenance tasks. In such case, the City shall send an invoice of its reasonable maintenance costs to the Developer or its successors or assigns, which shall include all reasonable staff time, engineering and legal and other reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City. If the Developer or its successors or assigns fails to reimburse the City for its costs and expenses in maintaining the Stormwater Improvements within 30 days of receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City shall have the right to assess the full cost thereof against the Property. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges that the maintenance work performed by the City regarding the Stormwater Improvements benefits the Property in an amount which exceeds the assessment and hereby waives any right to hearing or notice and the right to appeal the assessments otherwise provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of an emergency, as determined by the city engineer, the 30-day notice requirement to the Developer for failure to perform maintenance tasks shall be and hereby is waived in its entirety by the Developer, and the Developer shall reimburse the City and be subject to assessment for any expense so incurred by the City in the same manner as if written notice as described above has been given. 3. Hold Harmless. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising out of or resulting from the Developer’s, or the Developer’s agents’ or employees’ negligent or intentional acts, or any violation of any safety law, regulation or code in the performance of this Agreement, without regard to any inspection or review made or not made by the City, its agents or employees or failure by the City, its agents or employees to take any other prudent precautions, except to the extent of intentional or grossly negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and representatives. In the event the City, upon the failure of the Developer to comply with any conditions of this Agreement, performs said conditions pursuant to its authority in this Agreement, the Developer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its employees, agents and representatives for its own negligent acts in the performance of the Developer’s required work under this Agreement, but this indemnification shall not extend to intentional or grossly negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and representatives. C-3 787877.v4 4. Costs of Enforcement. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all reasonable costs prudently incurred by the City in the enforcement of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees after providing written notice to Developer and a reasonable opportunity to cure. 5. Rights Not Exclusive. No right of the City under this Agreement shall be deemed to be exclusive and the City shall retain all rights and powers it may have under Minnesota Statutes, sections 444.16 to 444.21 to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain and otherwise improve the Stormwater Improvements. 6. Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall either be personally delivered or be sent by United States certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: a) as to Developer: BPS Properties, LLC ________________________ ________________________ Attn: ________________________ b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attention: City Administrator with a copy to: Ronald H. Batty Kennedy & Graven 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this paragraph. 7. Successors and Assigns. All duties and obligations of Developer under this Agreement shall also be duties and obligations of Developer’s successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the Property. 8. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be binding and effective as of the date first written above. [signature pages to follow] C-4 787877.v4 THE DEVELOPER: By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 2022, by __________________, the ______________________ of BPS Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of said entity. ____________________________________ Notary Public C-5 787877.v4 CITY OF MEDINA By: __________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor By: __________________________________ Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2022, by Kathleen Martin, the mayor of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2022, by Scott T. Johnson, the city administrator of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public This instrument drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 C-A-1 787877.v4 EXHIBIT A TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Property Lot 1, Block 1, Lots 1 through 3, Block 2, Lots 1 through 15, Block 3, Lot 1, Block 4, Lots 1 through 10, Block 5, and Outlots A through E, all in Marsh Pointe Preserve, Hennepin County, Minnesota. C-B-1 787877.v4 EXHIBIT B TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Depiction of Location of Stormwater Improvements [to be inserted] C-C-1 787877.v4 EXHIBIT C TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Inspection and Maintenance Requirements [to be inserted] D-1 787877.v4 EXHIBIT D TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF TREE PRESERVATION DECLARATION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS THIS DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS (this "Declaration") is made as of this ____ day of ____________, 2022, by BPS Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Declarant"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of certain real property located in the city of Medina, Hennepin County, Minnesota and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, in order to facilitate the development of the Property, the maximum number of trees were removed from the Property, as otherwise allowed under local law; and WHEREAS, the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”), requires the Property be protected from additional tree removal and that such provisions be set forth in a document recorded in the real estate records. NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant hereby declares the Property shall be transferred, held, sold, conveyed, occupied and developed subject to the following covenants, conditions, and restrictions which are hereby granted by Declarant and shall run with the land and be binding on all parties having any right, title or interest in the Property or any part thereof, their successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of all owners thereof and the City. 1. Restrictions. Any tree removal that occurs on the Property shall be subject to the City’s tree replacement requirements, or payment to the City of a fee in lieu thereof, both of which are expressly provided in the City’s tree preservation ordinance, as may be amended from time to time. 2. Severability. Invalidation of any one of these covenants or restrictions by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any other provisions, all of which shall remain in full force and effect. 3. Duration. The covenants and restrictions of this Declaration shall run with and bind the land, and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the City, the Declarant, or any owner of any portion of the Property subject to this Declaration, or their heirs, successors and assigns, for a term of 30 years after the date this Declaration is recorded. 4. Notices. All notices under this Declaration shall either be personally delivered or be sent by United States certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: D-2 787877.v4 a) as to Developer: BPS Properties, LLC ________________________ ________________________ Attn: ________________________ b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attention: City Administrator with a copy to: Ronald H. Batty Kennedy & Graven 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this paragraph. 5. Amendment. This Declaration may be amended by an instrument signed by all owners of any portion of the Property and the City. Each amendment must be recorded to be effective. 6. Interpretation. The interpretation and performance of this Declaration shall be governed by the applicable laws of the State of Minnesota. ************************ D-3 787877.v4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the Declarant herein, has hereunto caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year first above written. DECLARANT By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 2022, by __________________, the ______________________ of BPS Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of said entity. ____________________________________ Notary Public This document drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 787877.v4 D-A-1 EXHIBIT A TO TREE PROTECTION DECLARATION Lot 1, Block 1, Lots 1 through 3, Block 2, Lots 1 through 15, Block 3, Lot 1, Block 4, Lots 1 through 10, Block 5, and Outlots A through E, all in Marsh Pointe Preserve, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 787877.v4 E-1 EXHIBIT E TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made this ____ day of ___________, 2022, by and between the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”), and BPS Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Grantor”). RECITALS A. Grantor is the fee owner of property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”). B. Grantor and the City have entered into a separate planned unit development agreement (the “Development Agreement”) regarding the subdivision and development of the Property. C. The City has granted approval of the rezoning and the plat of Marsh Pointe Preserve concerning the Property (the “City Approvals”), under the terms of which the Grantor is required to establish upland buffers adjacent to wetlands on portions of the Property consistent with City regulations (the “Easement Area”). D. In accordance with the Development Agreement, the City Approvals and the City’s wetland preservation ordinance, the City has requested that Grantor grant to the City an upland buffer easement (the “Upland Buffer Easement”) over the Easement Area. E. The Easement Area is legally described in Exhibit B and depicted in Exhibit C, both attached hereto. F. Grantor is willing to grant the Upland Buffer Easement in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. PROVISIONS In consideration of the mutual promises of the parties contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Grantor hereby grants and conveys to the City and its successors and assigns, the Upland Buffer Easement in, under, on, over and across the Easement Area, and the City hereby accepts such grant. The duration of this easement is perpetual, subject to Minnesota law governing granting of easements to governmental bodies, and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties, their successors and assigns. 2. The following terms and conditions shall apply to the Easement Area: 787877.v4 E-2 a. The Easement Area shall be planted with native grasses and other vegetation consistent with the landscaping plan approved by the City in connection with the City Approvals and thereafter be preserved predominantly in its natural condition, except to the extent set forth below. No use shall be made of the Easement Area except uses, if any, which would not change or alter the condition of the Easement Area or its drainage, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, or fish and wildlife habitat and characteristics. b. No structures, hardcover or other improvements shall be constructed, erected, or placed upon, above, or beneath the Easement Area, with the exception of a boardwalk or dock not to exceed four feet in width to allow reasonable access to and across the wetland. c. No trees, shrubs or other vegetation shall be destroyed, cut or removed from the Easement Area except as is necessary to remove storm damage, diseased or non- native vegetation or as authorized by the prior written consent of the City consistent with the wetland preservation ordinance. A path no more than four feet in width may be mowed to allow reasonable access to the wetland. d. No earth, peat, gravel or soil, sand or any other natural material or substance shall be moved or removed from the Easement Area and there shall be no dredging or excavation of any nature whatsoever or any change of the topography of the Easement Area without the prior written consent of the City. e. No soil, sand, gravel or other substance or material as landfill shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Easement Area, and no waste, trash, yard waste, manure or other materials shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Easement Area without the prior written consent of the City. 3. Grantor represents that Grantor owns the Easement Area in fee simple, subject only to the encumbrances of record. 4. The Grantor conveys to the City and its successors and assigns, the following rights: a. The City may enter upon the Easement Area for the purposes of inspection and enforcement of the covenants contained herein and to cause to be removed from the Easement Area without any liability any structures, uses, materials, substances, or unnatural matter inconsistent with the covenants contained herein and the natural state of the Easement Area. If there is a violation of the covenants contained herein, the City shall provide notice and an order for corrective action consistent with City regulations. If the Grantor does not take the required corrective action, the City may enter the Property in order to perform the action. In such case, the City shall send an invoice of its reasonable maintenance costs to the Grantor, which shall include all reasonable staff time, engineering and legal and other reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City. If the Grantor fails to reimburse the City for its costs and expenses within 45 days of receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City shall have the right to assess the full cost thereof against the Property. The Grantor, 787877.v4 E-3 on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges that any such corrective work performed by the City benefits the Property in an amount which exceeds the assessment and hereby waives any right to hearing or notice and the right to appeal the assessments otherwise provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. b. The City may bring an action in any court of competent jurisdiction against the Grantor to enforce the terms of this Agreement; to require restoration of the Easement Area to its planted or more natural condition; to enjoin such non- compliance by temporary or permanent injunction and to recover any damages arising from such non-compliance. If a court determines that the Grantor has failed to comply with this Agreement, Grantor or Grantor’s successors or assigns shall reimburse the City for any reasonable costs of enforcement, including costs of restoration, court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, in addition to any other payments ordered by the court. 5. Grantor hereby grants and conveys to the City a perpetual flowage easement and right and privilege to trespass with water over and upon any or all of the Easement Area. 6. Grantor retains all responsibilities and shall bear all costs and liabilities of any kind related to ownership, operation and maintenance of the Property and the Easement Area. 7. Grantor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officials, employees and agents, against any and all loss, costs, damage and expense, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs that the City incurs because of the breach of any of the above covenants and/or resulting from or due to Grantor’s intentional misrepresentation of any material fact contained therein. The Grantor and the City agree that each shall be responsible for their own acts and the results of such acts and shall not be responsible for the act of the other party and the results of such acts. 8. This Agreement may be amended only by mutual written agreement of the parties. 9. Nothing herein shall give the general public a right of access to the Property. 10. Grantor’s obligations under this Agreement run with the Property and shall be binding on the Grantor’s successors and assigns. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon creation of a homeowners’ association for the Property (the “HOA”) by an instrument in a form satisfactory to the City the HOA shall be obligated to perform the obligations and responsibilities of the Grantor under this Agreement, the HOA shall be bound by all terms and conditions of this Agreement as if it were the original signatory hereto and the Grantor, its successors and assigns, shall be released from all personal liability and any and all obligations under this Agreement but the Property shall remain subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Nothing in this Paragraph 10 is deemed to alter or amend the remaining terms of the Agreement in the event of a transfer of the Grantor’s interest. 11. Any notice required in this Agreement shall be delivered personally or sent by U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested: 787877.v4 E-4 a) as to Developer: BPS Properties, LLC ________________________ ________________________ Attn: ________________________ b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attention: City Administrator with a copy to: Ronald H. Batty Kennedy & Graven 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this paragraph. ************************ 787877.v4 E-5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Upland Buffer Easement Agreement have caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year aforesaid. BPS PROPERTIES, LLC By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 2022, by __________________, the ______________________ of BPS Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of said entity. ____________________________________ Notary Public 787877.v4 E-6 CITY OF MEDINA By: __________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor By: __________________________________ Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2022, by Kathleen Martin, the mayor of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2022, by Scott T. Johnson, the city administrator of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public This instrument drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 787877.v4 E-A-1 EXHIBIT A TO UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description Lot 1, Block 1, Lots 1 through 3, Block 2, Lots 1 through 15, Block 3, Lot 1, Block 4, Lots 1 through 10, Block 5, and Outlots A through E, all in Marsh Pointe Preserve, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 787877.v4 E-B-1 EXHIBIT B TO UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of Upland Buffer Easement [to be inserted] E-C-1 787877.v4 EXHIBIT C TO UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT Depiction of Upland Buffer Easement [to be inserted] F-1 787877.v4 EXHIBIT F TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF TRAIL EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT is made by BPS Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, Grantor, in favor of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, Grantee. Recitals A. Grantor is the fee owner of the property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”). B. Grantor desires to grant to the Grantee a trail easement, according to the terms and conditions contained herein. C. The easement is legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto. The easement is depicted in Exhibit C attached hereto. Terms of Easements 1. Grant of Easement. For good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged by Grantor, Grantor grants and conveys to the Grantee a perpetual, non-exclusive easement for public trail purposes over, under, across and through the portion of the Property legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto. 2. Scope of Easement. The perpetual easement for trail purposes granted herein includes the right of the Grantee, its contractors, agents, and employees to locate, install, construct, reconstruct, operate, maintain, inspect, alter and repair within the described easement area any of the following facilities and amenities: public sidewalk or trail, trail signage, informational kiosks, benches, bike racks, fences, trail bridges/tunnels, and any other trail related structure. Said trail easement is for public trailway purposes only, and such trail shall be open to the general public and be used exclusively for outdoor recreation and commuting, including, but not limited to, walking, jogging, skating, biking, and uses allowed under State and Federal law, including, but not limited to, other personal driven mobility devices (OPDMD’s) and electric personal assistive devices. In addition, motor vehicles used for maintenance, law enforcement or other public uses will be permitted within the easement. The easement granted herein also includes the right to cut, trim, or remove from the easement areas trees, shrubs, or other vegetation as in the Grantee’s judgment unreasonably interfere with the easement or facilities of the Grantee, its successors or assigns. 3. Warranty of Title. The Grantor warrants that it is the owner of the Property and has the right, title and capacity to convey to the Grantee the easement herein. 4. Environmental Matters. The Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs, expenses, damages, demands, obligations, including penalties and reasonable attorney's fees, or losses F-2 787877.v4 resulting from any claims, actions, suits or proceedings based upon a release or threat of release of any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants which may have existed on, or which relate to, the easement area or Property prior to the date of this instrument. 5. Binding Effect. The terms and conditions of this instrument shall run with the land and be binding on the Grantor, its successors and assigns. STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: NONE Dated this _____ day of ______________, 2022. By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 2022, by __________________, the ______________________ of BPS Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of said entity. ____________________________________ Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 787877.v4 F-A-1 EXHIBIT A TO TRAIL EASEMENT Legal Description of the Property [to be inserted] 787877.v4 F-B-1 EXHIBIT B TO TRAIL EASEMENT Legal Description of Easement [to be inserted] 787877.v4 F-C-1 EXHIBIT C TO TRAIL EASEMENT Depiction of Easement [to be inserted] 787877.v4 G-1 EXHIBIT G TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF QUIT CLAIM DEED (Top 3 inches reserved for recording data) QUIT CLAIM DEED Business Entity to Business Entity eCRV number: _____________ DEED TAX DUE: $____________________ DATE: ____________________ FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, City of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Grantor”), hereby conveys and quitclaims to BPS Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Grantee”), real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as follows: [to be inserted] Total consideration for this transaction is less than $3,000.00 Check here if all or part of the described real property is Registered (Torrens) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. Check applicable box: The Seller certifies that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document or has been electronically filed. (If electronically filed, insert WDC number: _________.) I am familiar with the property described in this instrument and I certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate. Grantor: City of Medina By:_____________________________ Kathleen Martin Its: Mayor By: _____________________________ Scott T. Johnson Its: City Administrator 787877.v4 G-2 State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2022, by Kathleen Martin and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. (Stamp) (signature of notarial officer) Title (and Rank): My commission expires: (month/day/year) THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 TAX STATEMENTS FOR THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE SENT TO: BPS Properties, LLC ______________________ ______________________ H-1 787877.v4 EXHIBIT H TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE H-2 787877.v4 H-3 787877.v4 K:\018785-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-31 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-04-15 Marsh Pt Pres Final Plat Review - WSB Engineering Comments.docx 7 0 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | S U I T E 3 0 0 | M I N N E A P O L I S , M N | 5 5 4 1 6 | 7 6 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | W S B E N G . C O M April 15, 2022 Mr. Dusty Finke City Planning Director City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: Marsh Pointe Preserve PUD Final Plat and Construction Plans – Engineering Review City Project No. LR-22-316 WSB Project No. 018785-000 Dear Mr. Finke: We have reviewed Marsh Pointe Preserve PUD Final Plat and construction plan submittal dated March 28, 2022. The applicant proposes to construct 30 single family home sites over approximately 39 located east of Arrowhead Drive at the future Chippewa Road intersection. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina’s general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. Final Plat & General Comments 1. The City Planner will provide comments pertaining to the proposed landscaping, reginal trail location/easements, and tree preservation plan under separate cover. Complete, acknowledged by applicant. 2. The street has not been named; the City Planner will provide comments concerning the street naming. Complete, acknowledged by applicant. 3. Provide specific drainage and utility easements outside of the roadway areas instead of noting them as outlots. It does not appear that Outlot B was designated as D&U. 4. Include the corner of the roadway/access area just east of Arrowhead Drive as public ROW to allow for flexibility in future extensions to the south. Complete. 5. It appears that improvements to Arrowhead Drive are no longer proposed with the Marsh Pointe subdivision improvements. Final design and plans between the adjacent Weston Woods development and Marsh Pointe will need to correlate with each other and include, but be limited to, pertinent match points/notes, utility locations, and trail/pedestrian access locations. If the Marsh Pointe project is constructed prior to the Weston Woods project/Arrowhead Drive, consideration of a temporary access design will need to be considered for the development. Complete, applicant has acknowledged the need for coordination between developments. 6. In order to calculate a letter of credit and construction engineering escrow amounts for the final development agreement, an engineer’s estimate (in Excel format) of the proposed street and utility improvements and a schedule for completion of construction City of Medina – Marsh Pointe Preserve PUD Final Plat and Construction Plans – WSB Engineering Review April 15, 2022 Page 2 K:\018785-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-31 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-04-15 Marsh Pt Pres Final Plat Review - WSB Engineering Comments.docx will be required. The estimate should also include the cost of landscaping items. This can be provided at the time of final plat submittal. Complete. 7. Note widths of drainage and utility easements on utility and storm sewer plans where pipes are present within easement. Not complete. 8. Three Rivers Park District (TRPD) typically requires a 20’ easement for their trail corridors. In the location where the trail is behind Lots 1-3 Blk 2 show a 12’ easement to the north and 8’ to the south (from centerline of trail). Complete. In this same area, there are swales adjacent to the trail on the south side crossing multiple lots, these should be encompassed within drainage and utility easements. Complete. 9. Provide a 5’ easement beyond ROW where trail is adjacent to the ROW. Complete. 10. Maximize the amount of ROW adjacent to Lot 1 Blk 3 for future roadway extension. Also provide a larger D&U on the west side of this lot to allow for grading/construction of the future street. Complete. 11. Instead of creating Outlot C, show this as ROW. Complete. 12. In the rear of Lot 10 Blk 5 there should be a wider easement to accommodate the drainage/swale from the adjacent lot. Complete. Existing Site & Demolition Plans (Sheets 1.1 – 1.2) 13. With final plat submittal, provide a removals/demolition plan to show what trees are proposed to be removed, buildings to be demolished, impacts to Arrowhead Drive, etc. Complete. 14. The existing site and demolition plans will also need to include existing utility locations, pipe sizes, pipe material types, etc. Show more of the water/sewer main along Arrowhead Drive and Hackamore Road further north and south beyond the proposed access point. Complete. 15. By the time the Marsh Pointe development construction will occur, the Chippewa Rd / Arrowhead Dr project will be well underway and even substantially complete. On the existing conditions sheet add more detail as to where Chippewa/Arrowhead may actually be located as what will likely be the existing condition. Complete. 16. There appears to be trees proposed for removal beyond the property to the north into the Bridgewater development/lots. Access to adjacent properties and the removal of trees on adjacent properties shall have the written consent of these property owners. In-progress. 17. Show location of existing wells and note what is to be done with these. Complete. Erosion Control, SWPPP Plans, Details (Sheets 2.0 – 2.3) 18. An NPDES permit will need to be obtained for this project and a SWPPP must be developed in accordance with the MN Construction Stormwater Permit. Complete; Permit ID C00063201. City of Medina – Marsh Pointe Preserve PUD Final Plat and Construction Plans – WSB Engineering Review April 15, 2022 Page 3 K:\018785-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-31 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-04-15 Marsh Pt Pres Final Plat Review - WSB Engineering Comments.docx 19. A detailed review of erosion/sediment control will be conducted with the final plat submittal. Redundant perimeter control is required along wetlands. Provide additional silt fence along these areas. Complete. 20. Include a note in the SWPPP and/or notes section that a dewatering plan must be prepared and submitted to the City Engineer prior to initiating any dewatering activities. Complete. 21. On Sheet 2.0 it is clear what is proposed for permanent stabilization of wetland buffer areas and ponds. It is not clear what is proposed for temporary and permanent stabilization of all other areas that will be disturbed. Include temporary and permanent stabilization measures for all exposed soils areas. Applicant indicated that additional hatchings were added to show general roadside seed and mulch—this is acceptable for permanent measures. Still looking for information regarding what temporary stabilization measures will include for each different hatching. 22. Clarify in the SWPPP if any stormwater mitigation measures are required as part of environmental, endangered species, archeological or other local, state, etc. reviews conducted for the project. Applicant indicated that no environmental reviews were required or conducted—please clarify this in the SWPPP. 23. Clarify in the SWPPP if any site assessments for groundwater and soil contamination were required and any mitigation measures resulting from these reviews. 24. Clarify in the SWPPP that stockpiles must be located outside of natural buffers or surface waters, including stormwater conveyances, unless there is a bypass in place. Complete. 25. Clarify in the SWPPP that required inspections and maintenance will be performed in accordance with NPDES permit requirements. Complete. 26. Describe best management practices for pollution prevention measures, including storage/handling/disposal of materials and wastes, vehicle fueling/maintenance, management of concrete and other washout wastes, and portable toilets. Complete. 27. Include a description in the SWPPP of procedures to amend the SWPPP to be consistent with NPDES permit requirements. Complete. 28. Provide tabulated estimated quantities for all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs anticipated for the life of the project. Temporary stabilization measures are not included. Provide quantities for energy dissipation at pipe outlets (IE CY of rip rap). Please revise the quantities to include this information. 29. Elm Creek was identified as a receiving water for the project. If the creek cannot fit on the plan sheets, use an arrow to note the direction and distance from the project. Complete. 30. In areas where native seeding is proposed, consider using type 3 mulch which is certified weed-free (type 1 mulch is not certified weed-free). Complete. 31. What permanent seed mix will be used in areas where erosion control blanket is shown (sheet 2.0, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan)? Is the erosion control blanket intended to be used for temporary stabilization? If so, what will permanent measures include? Grading & Drainage Plans (Sheets 3.0 – 3.2) 32. Label more of the proposed contours and the location of all EOF’s. Locations of EOF’s or other concentrated discharge point over vegetated areas will require a permanent energy dissipation/stabilization method such as rip-rap or permanent turf reinforcement matting. City of Medina – Marsh Pointe Preserve PUD Final Plat and Construction Plans – WSB Engineering Review April 15, 2022 Page 4 K:\018785-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-31 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-04-15 Marsh Pt Pres Final Plat Review - WSB Engineering Comments.docx The cross section of the proposed turf reinforcement mat should show the matting extending up the sides of the slope to 1’above the bottom of the EOF. Complete. 33. With final plat submittal provide the following: Complete. a. In general maintain all surface grades within the minimum of 2% and maximum 33% slopes. Vegetated swale grades shall also be a minimum of 2.0%. b. Drainage arrows on plans showing direction of runoff. Note specifically high points between each side-yard swale. c. Include percent slope In all other swale locations and verify that it meets the City requirement of 2%. d. Add rip-rap quantities and class notes at each flared end section and pond overflows (if applicable). e. Note the size of proposed storm sewer structures on street/plan profile drawings. 34. Consider ways to move the wall further away from the property line to allow for the placement of the fence and additional screening landscaping and avoid the removal of trees on the adjacent property. Concentrated/swale drainage should not be directed over the trail (near the easterly retaining wall), catch basins upstream of the trail should be installed to capture this runoff. Provide details for the retaining wall and plans from the wall designer. It can take several weeks for review, comments, updates, and resolution. 35. Grading/contours through the future trail alignment within Outlot A to the north should be designed to accommodate a future extension. The proposed grading crossing the future trail near the future parking area is too steep, see additional comments from City staff under separate cover. 36. The grading plan does not show swales between all of the lot locations or for stand-alone lots grades are perpendicular to pad. In some locations, the contour grading indicates grades directed to the building pad (i.e. Lots 7-8, 9-10 Blk 5) or only partial swales (i.e. lots 6-9 Block 3, and other locations). The grading plan is used in the approval process for building permits, the swales need to be an accurate representation of what is expected for the builders. Complete. 37. Other specific grading comments: a. On the west side of Lot 1 Blk 2, due to the adjacent drainage area, move the “HP” further west of the garage and lower grade. Complete. b. In the rear of Lot 9 Blk 5 there appears to be an errant drainage arrow. Complete. c. On the north side of Lot 1 Blk 5 adjacent to the lot line provide more spot elevations to show how offsite drainage will be conveyed around/through the lot. Complete. 38. Add wetland buffer signs to grading plan. Complete. Overall Utility Plan & Sewer/Water Construction Plans (Sheets 4.0 – 4.3) 39. Hydrant locations shall be reviewed and approved of by the City Fire Marshal; typically, a maximum of 250’ overlapping influence radius (maximum 400’ spacing) is required along roadway (hose length). Hydrant locations should also consider placement at high-points in the profile for flushing air out of the system. Also, the hydrant located at station 3+00 should be moved to the other side of the street so that it is not within this boulevard. Profile of watermain at the end of the cul-de-sac should be modified so that the hydrant at the end is the high-point in the profile. Complete. City of Medina – Marsh Pointe Preserve PUD Final Plat and Construction Plans – WSB Engineering Review April 15, 2022 Page 5 K:\018785-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-31 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-04-15 Marsh Pt Pres Final Plat Review - WSB Engineering Comments.docx 40. With final construction plans, provide confirmation of MDH (watermain) and MPCA (sanitary sewer) plan review and permitting. The City engineer will need to review and sign the sanitary sewer permit. In-progress, permits have been submitted by applicant, awaiting permit approvals from agencies. 41. Any public sanitary sewer and watermain shall be encompassed by drainage and utility easements where located outside of public road right of way. Drainage and utility easements will need to allow for a 1:1 trench from the invert of the utility with a minimum of 20’ centered on the utility. This requirement is not being met in all locations, review and update. 42. Coordinate with the Weston Woods project on the installation of the water/sewer connections into Arrowhead Drive. The City will not allow the new roadway pavement to be disturbed for the installation of these utility connections if the Weston Woods project/Arrowhead Drive is constructed first. Plans note stubs provided by others and to coordinate with Chippewa Road plans. The valve will need to be installed with Marsh Pointe project (to allow for testing by Marsh Pointe contractor), show valve in approximate location at stub. Complete. 43. The City may require utility stubs or services to the new park access area to the northeast. The City will provide a more detailed response to this with final construction plan review. Complete, City will not require service stubs. 44. The plans propose a long dead end watermain segment, provide an analysis for fire flow/capacity. Complete, pipe up-sized to meet fire flow demand calculations. 45. The existing sanitary manhole will need a new infi-shield installed, note as such on the plan. Add an note for all sewer manholes to add a “flex seal” or approved equal as a sealant to the interior chimney section. Add this note to the City standard detail as well, the City no longer uses the “top-hats” Complete. 46. Add general notes to the utility plans to the effect of: Complete. a. The City of Medina shall not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that are associated with variations in the utility as-built elevations. All utility connections shall be verified in the field. b. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The Owner and Engineer of Record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards. c. All watermain and sanitary sewer testing shall be done in accordance with the City of Medina standards and specifications. Copies of all test results shall be submitted to the City (Public Works Director, City Engineer), the Owner, and the Engineer of Record. d. Watermain shall have a minimum cover of 7.5’. e. The City will require televising for sanitary sewer pipe installations prior to accepting a warrant for the utility system provide report and video files to the City for review. 47. With final plat submittal provide the following: Complete. a. Plan/profile sheets for watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer. b. Provide dimension notes from watermain to parallel sewer mains (storm and sanitary sewer); the minimum horizontal separation between mains is 10 feet. Show on utility plan in various locations, especially where width varies. Where watermain crosses storm or sanitary sewer, add a note at each location to the City of Medina – Marsh Pointe Preserve PUD Final Plat and Construction Plans – WSB Engineering Review April 15, 2022 Page 6 K:\018785-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-31 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-04-15 Marsh Pt Pres Final Plat Review - WSB Engineering Comments.docx effect of “Maintain 18” Minimum Separation, 4” Rigid Insulation” on both the plan view and profile view locations (both utility and storm sewer sheets). c. Show water/sewer service location to each lot and include the curb stop location at utility easement location (10’ beyond ROW). For each lot location add the low floor opening elevation, sewer service station from downstream manhole, sewer service invert elevation at utility easement (10’ beyond ROW), riser height if applicable, and curb stop elevation. 48. Consider ways to eliminate the number of sanitary sewer manholes, especially in the deeper sections. In-progress with recent review/discussions, awaiting revised plan. 49. Irrigation well needs to be 50’ clear of any sanitary or storm sewer. Show dimensions on plan to both the sanitary sewer at street and storm sewer exiting pond. Complete. 50. Move the easterly 8” gate vale to the location where the reducer is between the 10” and 8”. Complete. 51. Add a watermain stub to the future street to the southeast (just east of Arrowhead Dr) with plug at end (no valve). Complete. Storm Sewer Construction Plans (Sheets 5.1 – 5.3) 52. Storm sewer pipes should be in drainage and utility easements, please verify that pipes are all within easements. Complete. 53. The road subgrade will require a draintile piping system placed a minimum of 100’ in each direction from the low point catch basin and extended to within 100’ of the high point in the street grade profile, whichever is greater. The draintile pipe size shall be a minimum of 4” and comprised of PVC Schedule 40 or SDR 26. Complete. 54. The City will require a common draintile collection system (rigid PVC Schedule 40 or SDR 26) for sump pump discharges for the lots that do not back up to a stormwater pond or wetland (Lot 1 Blk 1, Lots 1-3 Blk 2). In addition, at Lots 1-3 Blk 5, the sump discharges should be connected to the common collection system as the rear yards drain across each other in this area. Where sump stubs are connected, the size of the common collection system at the back of curb should be 6” and comprised of PVC schedule 40 or SDR 26. Complete. 55. Move STMH 501 further into what will be the future boulevard of the street extension to avoid the future curb but also the sidewalk. Complete. 56. Label on plan view which manholes are sump manholes. Complete. Overall Site Plan (Sheets 6.0) 57. With final plat submittal, provide a sheet with hatching for differing pavement types (streets, concrete walk, bituminous trails, ped ramps, etc.). Provide signing and striping sheet(s). Confirm whether or not there will be a monument sign. Complete with addition of overall site plan. 58. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building structures, cul-de-sacs, as required by the City Fire Marshall. The Fire Marshall will review and provide comments under separate cover. Complete. City of Medina – Marsh Pointe Preserve PUD Final Plat and Construction Plans – WSB Engineering Review April 15, 2022 Page 7 K:\018785-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-31 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-04-15 Marsh Pt Pres Final Plat Review - WSB Engineering Comments.docx 59. In general, note widths of street, boulevards, trail, sidewalk in various locations on this plan. 60. Set the proposed parking adjacent to the back of curb and surround with curb. Extend the bituminous trail to the north side of the parking areas (adjacent to back of curb) and transition the concrete walk to connect/end on the east side of the parking area. One of the parking spaces shall be handicapped accessible meeting ADA requirements (less than 2.0% in all directions); correctly show the space dimensions, access isle, and appropriate signage. Curb should be surmountable. Set the trail with a setback from the curb 10’ to allow snow storage. The sidewalk/trail should connect somehow on the east side of the parking area. Here is a markup of how the City would like the sidewalk: 61. The light pole located at the end of the cul-de-sac is too close to back of curb, move further into the ROW to avoid curb and draintile. Light poles will also need a 2’ clear zone to the edge of trail or sidewalk, it is not clear this attained where shown. Complete. 62. The City has decided that the two stand-alone parking spaces on the south side of the road are not necessary. Complete. 63. Signing and striping comments: a. The curve warning sign should be for a 20 MPH speed. b. Add handicapped striping and signage to one of the parking spots. c. The “No Parking Between Signs” on the curve should be extended further south to the property line of Lot 1 Blk 4 so that sight distances are not affected. 64. See notes from city, need shelf for train south to cul-de-sac. See notes on plan for consideration and creating more of a “shelf” to accommodate the future regional trail alignment. 65. Modify trail section at retaining wall similar to the markup shown on the plan to smooth out transition and reduce impacts to adjacent lot and swale. How will this wall be constructed so close to the property line without impacting the adjacent property to the north? City of Medina – Marsh Pointe Preserve PUD Final Plat and Construction Plans – WSB Engineering Review April 15, 2022 Page 8 K:\018785-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-31 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-04-15 Marsh Pt Pres Final Plat Review - WSB Engineering Comments.docx Street Construction Plans (Sheets 6.0 – 6.2) 66. A portion of the street across the wetland is proposed to be narrowed from 28’ to 24’ in width. City staff are amenable to this narrower roadway width; provide signage for no parking on both sides of the street in this area. Complete, acknowledged by applicant. 67. The proposed 10’ wide trail is shown to have only a 3’ boulevard for the first 700 feet from Arrowhead Drive east into the development. The boulevard width must be a minimum of 5’ where practicable. For the portion in front of the retaining wall(s) consider other options to either widen or eliminate the boulevard where the trail parallels the retaining wall (moving street to the south, widen trail paving either/or up to the wall and/or up to the street adjacent to curb, etc.). There also appears to be a 2’ boulevard between the wall and the trail; this portion should be paved to avoid unnecessary maintenance of vegetation. Complete. 68. For the portion of trail adjacent to the retaining wall in the rear yards of Lots 1-3 Blk 2, pave trail up to wall face (12’ wide in the at location). Complete. 69. Bituminous trail is greater than 5.0% in profile grade in some locations, revised grading to be 5% or less. Complete. 70. City design standards typically require horizontal and vertical curve lengths to meet a 30 MPH design speed for local streets, at minimum. With the standard, the minimum low speed urban horizontal curve radius is 300’ and the minimum vertical curve length is 90’; None of the horizontal curves will meet this criteria. Confirm what design criteria is being used and provide sight distance review of the sharpest curve to the east as well. Complete, the applicant is meeting a minimum of a 25 MPH design speed horizontal curve standard with the exception of the last horizontal curve to the east due to site constraints. Vertical curves meet a 30 MPH design speed. 71. A short curve was added to the west end of the roadway alignment in front of Lot 1. The curve will need to be lengthened or eliminated to avoid the short radius. Complete. 72. With final plat submittal provide the following: Complete. d. Include profile drawings for the street within the development that include percent grade, and standard geometric/design information. Add horizontal curve information to either the Site Plan or Street Plan Sheets. Complete. e. Applicable City standard detail plates, see specific notes in section below. Complete, see review in section below. City of Medina – Marsh Pointe Preserve PUD Final Plat and Construction Plans – WSB Engineering Review April 15, 2022 Page 9 K:\018785-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-31 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-04-15 Marsh Pt Pres Final Plat Review - WSB Engineering Comments.docx Construction Notes & Standard Details Plans (Sheets 7.0 – 7.3) 73. Retaining walls greater than 4’ in height will required certified engineering drawings/plans form a registered structural engineer. A safety fence/guardrail will be required at the top of the wall. Provide soil borings/geotechnical analysis for the area where the wall is proposed. The proposed retaining wall will be greater than 4’ in height. Plans for the retaining wall will need to be submitted with the final construction plans. Provide details for the retaining wall and plans from the wall designer. It can take several weeks for review, comments, updates, and resolution. 74. The proposed street section should be reviewed and designed by a geotechnical engineer. Provide soil borings and geotechnical report with final plat submittal. 75. Provide details for the proposed stormwater treatment areas. Complete. 76. Provide specific details for each of the control structures proposed. Complete. 77. A full review of standard details will be conducted with the final construction plan submittal. Complete. Traffic & Access 78. A visioning study was completed in November of 2019 for the Chippewa Road and Arrowhead Drive area. The intent of the study was to guide the transportation needs within the Arrowhead Drive and Chippewa Road corridors. The tee intersection of Hackamore Road into Arrowhead shown on the applicant’s plans appears to be consistent with the study and was identified as a feasible option to accommodate the increase in traffic as development occurs in the area. Acknowledged by Applicant. 79. The location of the proposed development access road was originally intended to tee off of Hackamore as noted within the visioning study. The applicant has shown the driveway approximately 300’ south of the future Hackamore Road tee intersection on Arrowhead Drive instead. Acknowledged by Applicant. Move the driveway location as far south as possible to provide the most flexibility with turn lane configurations on Arrowhead Drive. With this proposed driveway location, southbound left turn lane and northbound right turn lanes will be required with the level of traffic expected by 2040. See review of traffic study dates 4/9/22 and recommendations. A southbound left turn lane into the development will be required. A northbound right turn is warranted and although the ROW from this development has been provided, there is not enough ROW to construct a full turn lane. At this time (until property to the south is developed) the City will not require a right turn lane to be construction with the project. However, provide a longer radius (southerly) at the entrance to make right turns into the development easier. 80. With the potential for future development to the south, consider other options for the access drive off of Arrowhead Drive to allow for the proposed access to be moved further to the south in the future. This will allow more flexibility in alignment with future development on the west side of Arrowhead Drive. A future street/stub to the south is shown on the plans however, the location should be moved as far east as possible to reduce the conflicts with the Arrowhead Drive intersection. Complete. City of Medina – Marsh Pointe Preserve PUD Final Plat and Construction Plans – WSB Engineering Review April 15, 2022 Page 10 K:\018785-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-31 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-04-15 Marsh Pt Pres Final Plat Review - WSB Engineering Comments.docx 81. The vertical and horizontal geometrics along Arrowhead Drive is proposed to be modified with the Weston Woods development plans; Arrowhead Drive has a 40 MPH design speed. Provide a sight distance exhibit for the proposed Marsh Pointe driveway access location. Not provided with preliminary plat submittal, concern is primarily with vertical sight distance to the south. Complete, sight line exhibit provided and appears to meet criteria. 82. Should the development be completed prior to the Arrowhead Drive realignment, provide details on the temporary connection to the existing Arrowhead Drive. Stormwater Management & Modelling 83. The development will need to meet the appropriate watershed standards and the applicant shall submit for the required permits. Provide final permitting documents and approvals from watershed. 84. The developer will need to submit a Stormwater Management Plan and modeling consistent with Medina’s Stormwater Design Manual. Complete. 85. The development will need to meet the City’s volume control requirement to capture and retain onsite 1.1” of runoff from the net new impervious surface. By satisfying the volume requirement the water quality requirement is considered met. Follow the City’s Stormwater Design Manual for alternative credits towards the volume requirement if infiltration is not feasible. Complete. f. Filtration is given 50% credit Per the City Stormwater Design Manual. If filtration is being used throughout the site, please account for 2.2 inches of runoff being treated to meet the requirements. g. Current plans show treatment of .647 ac-ft X 50%=0.3235 ac-ft. h. Consider irrigation reuse to meet volume control requirements. 86. The development will need to meet the City’s rate control requirement, which states that post development discharge rates must be less than or equal to existing conditions discharge rates. Complete. 87. Currently the development is proposing to treat one third of the impervious surface generated from the roundabout. Coordination with adjacent developments will be necessary to ensure that 100 percent of the impervious is account for when fully developed. Complete. 88. Water Reuse i. 1. Required design submittal packages for water reuse BMPs must include: a. An analysis using Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District Stormwater Reuse Calculator. An example of the Calculator can be found in Appendix E. The full spreadsheet can be requested from the City. a. Provide referenced spreadsheet noted in the comments. Information must be verified that the design meets requirements. j. Documentation demonstrating adequacy of soils, storage system, and delivery system; and c. Operations and maintenance plan. The O& M plan should follow the guidelines listed in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. a. Provide documentation on the operation and maintenance schedule of the reuse system. A plan must be submitted and approved before final approval. City of Medina – Marsh Pointe Preserve PUD Final Plat and Construction Plans – WSB Engineering Review April 15, 2022 Page 11 K:\018785-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-31 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-04-15 Marsh Pt Pres Final Plat Review - WSB Engineering Comments.docx k. Approved capacity of an irrigation practice will be based on: a. An irrigation rate of 1.0 inches per week over the irrigated pervious area(s), the rate identified through the Stormwater Reuse Calculator (whichever is less), or as approved by the City; and b. No greater than a 26 week (April 15th to October 15th) growing season. a. Provide documentation and calculations showing that this is being met. l. Design of the irrigation system must include, but is not limited to, the following items. Each system will be reviewed and approved by the City on a site-by-site basis. a. Plumbing code review, adherence, and permitting, if applicable. b. Water reuse pump system design including supply line, intake, meter, and pump c. Electrical and controls design d. Construction drawings, specifications, and system integration a. Additional details to be provided by irrigation designer m. Two (2) feet of permanent pool from the bottom of the pond must be maintained following drawdown for irrigation. Stormwater Design Manual City of Medina, MN WSB Project No. 011705-000 Page 20 n. Use rates should be monitored at least monthly for at least three years. This should be compared to the water budget analysis of the design to determine whether the modeled level of performance is being achieved. 89. Stormwater Pond 2P o. 80% credit for using stormwater ponds with extended detention storage. Additional information on extended detention requirements is found in Section 7.4. a. Provide calculations and documentation showing that the extended detention is being met. p. 60% credit for using stormwater ponds without water reuse. 90. The City requires two feet of freeboard from structure low openings to 100-year high water levels and EOF’s. Provide maintenance access to all ponding facilities. q. Lot 1 Block 1 currently does not meet freeboard requirements. Freeboard must be met for EOF route along property line. HWL of 996.18 for Pond 2P and low opening of 996.3 for lot 1 block 1. r. Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 of Block 3 currently do not meet the 2 foot freeboard requirements. s. Clearly label the EOF for each basin on the grading plan including a stabilized overflow t. Clearly label EOFs for drain inlets to meet the city’s freeboard requirements. u. Provide information on HWL for the adjacent wetland. 91. Provide a maintenance access to all permanent stormwater management best management practices. Complete. 92. With final design, provide storm sewer calculations using the rational method, sizing storm sewer for the 10-yr 24-hr Atlas 14 rainfall. Provide drainage area map for storm sewer sizing and calculations. Complete. 93. Provide pretreatment for the direct storm sewer outfalls to the NURP/filtration basins in the form of 4 foot sumps per City standards. Complete. City of Medina – Marsh Pointe Preserve PUD Final Plat and Construction Plans – WSB Engineering Review April 15, 2022 Page 12 K:\018785-000\Admin\Docs\2022-03-31 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-04-15 Marsh Pt Pres Final Plat Review - WSB Engineering Comments.docx Wetlands & Buffers 94. 10% removal of significant trees is allowed for areas of 10-20 acres for redevelopment as outlined in city ordinances. a. Provide tree inventory table and summary showing all trees onsite and proposed removals. b. Currently the tree preservation plan is accounting for 25% allowable removals. All numbers will need to be updated to meet city requirements. 95. Show replacement tree locations on plan sheet. 96. Provide size, species, and number of replacement trees a. All deciduous Replacement Trees shall be a Diameter of at least two (2) caliper inches in size. All coniferous Replacement Trees shall be at least four (4) feet in height b. All Replacement Trees shall be planted within the Development Site, in a non- patterned arrangement, duplicating natural conditions whenever possible. Replacement Trees may be planted in an alternative location if that location is approved by the city council c. All Replacement Trees shall be appropriate for the soil conditions found at the planting site. All Replacement Trees shall be from certified nursery stock and shall not be bare root stock. d. If more than twelve (12) Replacement Trees are required on a Development Site, there shall be no more than twenty-five (25) percent of the same species. 97. Tree Replacement Plan will need to be submitted to the city for review and approval by the city council. The Tree Replacement Plan shall be certified by a Forestry Specialist. 98. Wetlands were delineated and boundaries approved. Complete. 99. A replacement plan has been submitted to the City for WCA review on January 13, 2022. The comment period for this review ended on March 3, 2022 and a decision to approve the replacement plan was made on March 9, 2022. Provide a copy of the BWSR credit withdrawal verification letter to the City once approved. 100. Wetland adjacent to the development is classified as a Preserve Wetland on the City’s Functional Classification of Wetlands Map and is adjacent to a mapped Minnesota County Biological Survey Site of Biodiversity Significance. Average 50-foot-wide buffers (30-foot minimum) are required adjacent to Preserve Wetlands. Proposed buffers are only 30 feet wide (minimum 20 feet) and do not meet the buffer standards. Complete. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet. Sincerely, WSB Jim Stremel, P.E. City Engineer HW L HWL HW L HW L HW L H W L 21+00 22+0 0 23 + 0 0 24 + 0 0 2 5 + 0 0 2 6 + 0 0 27 + 0 0 28 + 0 0 29 + 0 0 30 + 0 0 31 + 0 0 31 + 4 3 . 7 1 L.P. CL C L % 2. 7 G . B . % 2 . 7 H. P . % 1. 5 % 2.0 VMA HW L HW L HW L HW L H W L H W L H W L HWLHWLHWLHWL 99 2 99 8 992 998 10 0 4 988 9 9 8 992 982 984 98 4 9 8 4 9 9 2 982 98 6 . 2 98 6 . 2 9 8 6 . 2 98 6 . 2 98 6 . 2 86 . 0 EOF 984 98 8 984 988 988 9 8 8 98 8 980 982 984 985 86.1 EOF 99 0 10 0 0 991992 988 985 984 9 9 0 990 990 992 994 996 9 9 6 996 996 99 2 99 6 9 9 4 986 . 6 986 . 6 9 8 6 . 6 986.6 98 8 . 2 9 8 8 . 5 98 6 9 8 4 9 8 2 9 8 1 9 8 0 97 8 98 1 98 2 9 8 4 9 8 4 98 0 98 2 98 4 9 8 4 982 984 VM A 0+00 1+00 2+0 0 3+0 0 4+ 0 0 97. 9 6 H.P . % 1.0 % 5.0 G. B . % 2. 0 99 . 9 7 998 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1000 1000 998 998 99 8 10 0 0 9 9 8 9 9 8 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L H W L H W L H W L H W L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HWL HW L HWL HWL HWL HWL H W L HW L HW L HW L HW L H W L HW L HW L HWL HW L HW L H W L HW L HW L HW L EOF 9 2 . 5 1 0 0 4 10 0 0 99 6 9 9 4 9 9 0 992 986 986 986 986 9 8 6 986 986 98 6 98 6 9 8 6 9 8 6 99 4 SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 SB-5 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8 SB-9 SB-10 SB-11 SB-12 SB-1 G(X) RWO Know what's below. before you dig.Call R KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That BPS Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property: The North 467 feet of the East 467 feet of the West 1122 feet (68 rods) of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian (Abstract) And Lot 1, Block 1,and Outlot B, Arrowhead Estates, according to the recorded plat thereof (Abstract) And Par 1: That part of Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, including the accretions thereto, lying and being northwest of the centerline of Hennepin County Ditch No. 26 and the Northeasterly extension thereof and Northeast of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the east line of Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, 400 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Government Lot 4; thence West on a line parallel to the South line of said Government Lot 4 a distance of 1000 feet to a point; thence Northwest to the Northwest corner of said Government Lot 4, and there ending. Said Government Lot 4, including accretions thereto, being described as follows, to-wit; Government Lot 4, including the accretions to Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, all described as commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 2; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 24 minutes 35 seconds West, along the North and South centerline of said Section 2 a distance of 608.56 feet; thence South 6 degrees 47 minutes 43 seconds West, a distance of 817.18 feet; thence South 36 degrees 53 minutes East, a distance of 1040.00 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence North 36 degrees 53 minutes west, a distance of 500.00 feet; thence South 46 degrees 38 minutes 24 seconds West to the North line of said Government Lot 4; thence Westerly along said North line to the Northwest corner of said Government Lot 4; thence Southerly along the West line of said Government Lot 4 to the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 4; thence easterly along the South line of said Government Lot 4 to the Southeast corner of said Government Lot 4; thence Northerly along the North and South centerline of said Section 2, a distance of 1006.25 feet, more or less, to an intersection with a line bearing South 35 degrees 18 minutes 24 seconds West from the actual point of beginning; thence North 35 degrees 18 minutes 24 seconds East, 942.56 feet, more or less to the actual point of beginning. Par 2: The North 66 feet of the East 196.71 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Par 3: The North 66 feet of the following described part of Government Lot 4 as measured at right angles to and drawn parallel with the North line of said Government Lot 4; That part of Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, lying and being West of the following described line: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23; thence Northeast to a point 1000 feet West on a line drawn parallel to the South line of said Government Lot 4 from a point on the East line of said Government Lot 4, 400 feet North of the southeast corner of said Government Lot 4; thence Northwest to the Northwest corner of said Government Lot 4 and there ending. (Torrens Property) (Torrens Certificate No. 1361928) And Par 1: The East 196.71 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, except therefrom the North 66 feet thereof. Par 2: That part of Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, lying and being West of the following described line: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Government Lot 4, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23; thence Northeast to a point 1000 feet West on a line drawn parallel to the South line of said Government Lot 4 from a point on the East line of said Government Lot 4, 400 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Government Lot 4; thence Northwest to the Northwest corner of said Government Lot 4 and there ending, except therefrom the North 66 feet thereof, according to the Government Survey thereof. (Torrens Property) (Torrens Certificate No. 1072649) And That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying east of the West 1122.00 feet thereof and west of the East 196.71 feet thereof. (Abstract) Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as MARSH POINTE PRESERVE and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public ways and the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said BPS Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 20 . Signed: BPS Properties, LLC By: its STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of , 20 , by , of BPS Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Signature Printed Name Notary Public County, My commission expires I Marcus F. Hampton do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 . ______________________________________________________________ Marcus F. Hampton, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 47481 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of , 20 , by Marcus F. Hampton. Signature Printed Name Notary Public County, Minnesota My commission expires January 31, CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA This plat of MARSH POINTE PRESERVE was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 20 , and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. By: Mayor Clerk RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20___ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, dated this day of , 20 . Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor By: _____________________________, Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 383B.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this day of , 20 . Chris F. Mavis, County Surveyor By: ______________________________ COUNTY RECORDER, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of MARSH POINTE PRESERVE was recorded in this office this day of , 20 , at ______ o'clock ______. M. Amber Bougie, County Recorder By: _____________________________, Deputy REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of MARSH POINTE PRESERVE was filed in this office this day of , 20 , at ______ o'clock ______. M. Amber Bougie, Registrar of Titles By: _____________________________, Deputy BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 2, T. 118, R. 23 WHICH IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF N 89°48'24" E DENOTES FOUND 1/2 INCH OPEN IRON PIPE MONUMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED DENOTES SET 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT WITH CAP MARKED R.L.S. NO. 47481 DENOTES HENNEPIN COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT DENOTES RECORD DIMENSION PER CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO. 1361928 BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 2, T. 118, R. 23 WHICH IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF N 89°48'24" E DENOTES SET 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT WITH CAP MARKED R.L.S. NO. 47481 DENOTES HENNEPIN COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTSARE SHOWN THUS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 2, T. 118, R. 23 WHICH IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF N 89°48'24" E DENOTES SET 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT WITH CAP MARKED R.L.S. NO. 47481 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTSARE SHOWN THUS: STORM SEWER SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NO.TYPE BUILD HEIGHT (FEET) STRUCTURE SIZE NEENAH CASTING CBMH-101 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE 9.30 ø R-3067-V CBMH-102 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE 3.94 ø R-3067-VB CB-103 CATCH BASIN 3.80 24"x36"R-4342 CBMH-201 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE 7.95 ø R-3501-TB CBMH-202 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE 3.91 ø R-3067-VB CBMH-203 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE 4.10 ø R-3067-V CBMH-204 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE 4.14 ø R-3067-V CB-2041 CATCH BASIN 3.80 24"x36"R-3067-V CBMH-205 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE 3.80 ø R-3067-V CBMH-206 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE 3.80 ø R-3067-V CB-207 CATCH BASIN 3.80 24"x36"R-3067-V CBMH-301 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE 13.53 ø R-3067-V CB-3011 CATCH BASIN 3.80 24"x36"R-3067-V CBMH-302 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE 6.31 ø R-3067-V CB-303 CATCH BASIN 3.80 24"x36"R-3067-VB OCS-401 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 5.00 ø SEE DETAIL STMH-501 STORM MANHOLE 7.87 ø R-1642 OCS-502 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 5.00 ø SEE DETAIL R O A D 23 + 0 0 2 4 + 0 0 2 5 + 0 0 2 6 + 0 0 27 + 0 0 28 + 0 0 29 + 0 0 30 + 0 0 31 + 0 0 31 + 4 3 . 7 1 0+00 1+00 2+0 0 3+0 0 4+ 0 0 5+ 0 0 5+ 7 0 . 1 1 HAC K A M O R E DRI V E SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 SB-5 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8 SB-9 SB-10 SB-11 SB-12 ST-1 R O A D 23 + 0 0 2 4 + 0 0 2 5 + 0 0 2 6 + 0 0 27 + 0 0 28 + 0 0 29 + 0 0 30 + 0 0 31 + 0 0 31 + 4 3 . 7 1 0+00 1+00 2+0 0 3+0 0 4+ 0 0 5+ 0 0 5+ 7 0 . 1 1 HAC K A M O R E DRI V E SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 SB-5 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8 SB-9 SB-10 SB-11 SB-12 ST-1 Know what's below. before you dig.Call R HW L HWL HW L HW L HW L H W L 21+00 22+0 0 23 + 0 0 24 + 0 0 2 5 + 0 0 2 6 + 0 0 27 + 0 0 28 + 0 0 29 + 0 0 30 + 0 0 31 + 0 0 31 + 4 3 . 7 1 L.P. CL C L % 2. 7 G . B . % 2 . 7 H. P . % 1. 5 % 2.0 VMA HW L HW L HW L HW L H W L H W L H W L HWLHWLHWLHWL 99 2 99 8 992 998 10 0 4 988 9 9 8 992 982 984 98 4 9 8 4 9 9 2 982 98 6 . 2 98 6 . 2 9 8 6 . 2 98 6 . 2 98 6 . 2 86 . 0 EOF 984 98 8 984 988 988 9 8 8 98 8 980 982 984 985 86.1 EOF 99 0 10 0 0 991992 988 985 984 9 9 0 990 990 992 994 996 9 9 6 996 996 99 2 99 6 9 9 4 986 . 6 986 . 6 9 8 6 . 6 986.6 98 8 . 2 9 8 8 . 5 98 6 9 8 4 9 8 2 9 8 1 9 8 0 97 8 98 1 98 2 9 8 4 9 8 4 98 0 98 2 98 4 9 8 4 982 984 VM A 0+00 1+00 2+0 0 3+0 0 4+ 0 0 97. 9 6 H.P . % 1.0 % 5.0 G. B . % 2. 0 99 . 9 7 998 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1000 1000 998 998 99 8 10 0 0 9 9 8 9 9 8 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L H W L H W L H W L H W L HW L HW L HW L HW L HW L HWL HW L HWL HWL HWL HWL H W L HW L HW L HW L HW L H W L HW L HW L HWL HW L HW L H W L HW L HW L HW L EOF 9 2 . 5 1 0 0 4 10 0 0 99 6 9 9 4 9 9 0 992 986 986 986 986 9 8 6 986 986 98 6 98 6 9 8 6 9 8 6 99 4 SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 SB-5 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8 SB-9 SB-10 SB-11 SB-12 SB-1 G(X) RWO Know what's below. before you dig.Call R SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 SB-5 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8 SB-9 SB-10 SB-11 SB-12 SB-1 Know what's below. before you dig.Call R STOP NO PARKING THIS SIDE OF STREET NO PARKING BETWEEN SIGNS 20 MPH Sign Ordinance – Internal Park Exemption Page 1 of 2 May 3, 2022 Ordinance Amendment City Council Meeting TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: April 27, 2022 MEETING: May 3, 2022 City Council SUBJECT: Ordinance Amendment – Sign Regulations – Internal Park Exemption Background At the April 5 meeting, the City Council discussed the proposed donation from the Hamel Lions, in partnership with Hamel Athletic Club and Hamel Hawks, to purchase a new digital display and scoreboard at the Paul Fortin Memorial Field in Hamel Legion Park. As noted during that discussion, the City’s sign ordinance contains an exemption for “Signs posted by authorized government officials on public land or right-of-way”… “provided that all other applicable requirements of this ordinance are met.” This language suggests that although signs in parks would not be required to obtain permits, limitations related to size, height, and similar aspects may still apply. The proposed digital display is larger than the City would permit for freestanding signs along roadways. The City’s practice has not been to apply the sign ordinance regulations on scoreboards and similar features within parks. For example, parcels would generally only be permitted one sign per frontage. In this case, the park has an actual monument sign at each entrance plus a number of the fields have scoreboards. Staff discussed clarifying the language of the sign ordinance so that the practice of not applying the sign limitations to these internal signs is more of an explicit exemption. The attached ordinance would exempt signs internal to city-owned parks and other city-owned properties. Such signs would still be able to be reviewed and approved by the City because they would be on City land. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the ordinance at its April 12 meeting. No one spoke at the public hearing, and an excerpt from the meeting minutes is attached for reference. Some Planning Commissioners raised concerns about the potential impacts of large displays on neighboring property owners. Staff noted that since the proposed exemption is limited to City property, the City has discretion in what is installed irrespective of additional sign ordinance regulations. Following discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance on a 5-1 vote. MEMORANDUM Agenda Item #8D Sign Ordinance – Internal Park Exemption Page 2 of 2 May 3, 2022 Ordinance Amendment City Council Meeting Potential Action If, following review of the ordinance, the Council finds that the proposed changes are appropriate, the following action could be taken: Move to adopt ordinance amending regulations pertaining to signs within city-owned parks. Attachments 1. Ordinance 2. Excerpt from DRAFT 4/12/2022 Planning Commission minutes CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. ### AN ORDINANCE AMENDING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO SIGNS WITHIN CITY-OWNED PARKS; AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE CITY CODE The City Council of the City of Medina ordains as follows: SECTION I. Section 815.05 of the code of ordinances of the City of Medina is amended by adding the underlined language as follows: Subd. 4. City Parks and Outdoor Recreational Areas. Signs located within city-owned parks and other city-owned recreational areas which are internal to the site and intended for the benefit of those within such property are exempt from the requirements of this ordinance. SECTION II. This ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and publication. Adopted by the Medina city council this ___ day of _______, 2022. ______________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: ________________________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk Published in the Crow River News on the ____ day of ______, 2022. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 4/12/2022 Minutes 1 Public Hearing – Ordinance Amendment – Chapter 8 of the City Code Pertaining to Signs within City-Owned Property Finke stated that this arose because of a donation from the Hamel Lions in partnership with Hamel Athletic Club (HAC) and Hamel baseball to install a dynamic display scoreboard in Hamel Legion Park. He stated that in the past the City has not reviewed scoreboards or internal advertising signs internal to the park for compliance with the sign ordinance. He stated that because of the size of the dynamic display the City Attorney suggested a more explicit exemption within the Code. He stated that it would seem to make sense that the same regulations would not be placed upon scoreboards and signs internal to the park, therefore staff suggests an exemption on those signs installed on City owned properties internal to a park. He noted that if the City is the owner of the property, there would still be review. He stated that in the future there could be review criteria developed for non-City owned property exemptions, such as school district properties. Sedabres asked the location of the scoreboard within Hamel Park and which direction the sign would face. Finke replied that this would replace the scoreboard on the Paul Fortin field which is north of the parking lot coming from Brockton Lane. He stated that it is not intended to be viewed from external of the site. Nielsen opened the public hearing at 8:59 p.m. No comments. Nielsen closed the public hearing at 8:59 p.m. Popp stated that this is a practical approach and would still allow for review and approval. Piper commented that she also feels comfortable with that process. Sedabres commented that he understands the use of commercial versus park is different but wanted to ensure that size and lighting would still be considered given the amount of discussion that the City has placed on those issues for commercial signs. He stated that it would seem that if the City does not like signs of a certain size, one could argue that should apply across the board as it could seem that commercial businesses are being held to a different standard than nonprofit organizations. Finke provided details on the size of the dynamic display proposed for the scoreboard, noting that it is large as it is intended to be seen from across a baseball field. Sedabres asked if there are specific requirements for hours or use or days of use. Finke stated that the display would be owned by the City in a City park and therefore could regulate those elements. Piper asked if the donors requested a specific size of the sign and whether that was conditional of their purchase of the sign. Finke replied that if the sign limitations were placed on the scoreboard, it would likely not move forward as it would not be visible for the intended purpose. Sedabres asked for more clarification on the location of the sign. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 4/12/2022 Minutes 2 Finke identified the location for the scoreboard. Nielsen asked how much bigger this scoreboard would be compared to the existing scoreboard. Finke provided the size of the proposed scoreboard and showed an image of the existing scoreboard, although he did not have those dimensions. Nielsen asked if there have been complaints related to the existing sign. Finke stated that he could not answer that question. He acknowledged that there is an interplay between recreational use of a park and adjacent residential properties but was unsure if there have been complaints related to the scoreboard itself. Motion by Grajczyk, seconded by Rhem, to recommend approval of ordinance amendment regulations pertaining to signs within City-owned parks and other City-owned property. A roll call vote was performed: Grajczyk aye Popp aye Piper aye Rhem aye Sedabres nay Nielsen aye Motion carries. Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 May 3, 2022 City Council Meeting TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: April 28, 2022 MEETING: May 3, 2022 City Council SUBJECT: Planning Department Updates Land Use Application Review A) Marsh Pointe Preserve Final Plat – 4250-4292 Arrowhead Drive – BPS Properties has requested Preliminary Plat approval for a 30-lot subdivision east of Arrowhead Drive south of Bridgewater. The City previously reviewed a concept plan for the project. The Council granted preliminary plat and PUD general plan approval at the March 1 meeting. The applicant has submitted for final plat approval, which is under review. Staff intends to present to Council at the May 3 meeting. B) Hamel Townhomes Pre Plat and Site Plan Review – Hamel Townhomes LLC has requested preliminary plat and site plan review approval for a 30-unit townhome development at 342 Hamel Road. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 12. Commissioners raised concerns with aspects of the proposed development and recommended denial on a 5-1 vote. Staff tentatively plans to present to City Council at the May 3 meeting. C) Bonner Variance – 2055 Tamarack Drive – Jeffrey Bonner has requested a variance from the 150-foot animal structure setback to replace an existing barn with a larger structure. The larger structure would include a larger barn plus additional storage and shop space. The larger structure is proposed to be setback the same distance as the existing barn from the northern property line (110’). The Planning Commission reviewed at the April 12 meeting and recommended approval. Staff intends to present to City Council on May 3. D) Cates Ranch/Willow Drive Warehouse Industrial – Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Environmental Assessment Worksheet – Oppidan has requested review of an EAW and a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for a warehouse/industrial development east of Willow Drive, north of Chippewa Road. The City Council reviewed at the April 5 meeting and following extensive discussion, the Council directed staff to prepare a resolution denying the request. The applicant has withdrawn the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and submitted concept plans with a smaller-scale development on the southern ½ of the property. Staff intends to present these concepts at the May 10 Planning Commission meeting and May 17 Council meeting. E) Prairie Creek Final Plat – Stelter Enterprises has requested final plat approval for a 17-lot villa subdivision at 500 Hamel Road. Staff intends to present to the City Council at the May 17 meeting. F) Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial – Loram and Scannell have submitted materials for the City to prepare an EAW for a warehouse/industrial development east of Arrowhead Drive, south of Highway 55, to the south of Loram’s existing facility. The council approved the findings of fact and made a negative declaration on the need for an EIS at the April 5 meeting. Staff will route the record of decision as required. The applicant has now also applied for preliminary plat and site plan review approval for construction of approximately 450,000 s.f. of office warehouse on three lots. Staff is conducting preliminary review and will present when complete, potentially at the June 14 Planning Commission Meeting. MEMORANDUM Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 May 3, 2022 City Council Meeting G) Weston Woods PUD and Plat Amendment – Mark and Kathleen Smith have requested an amendment to the approved PUD and plat. The amendment proposes to reduce the total number of lots by 3 and adjust required lot standards. The Council approved the updated documents on April 19. H) McDonald’s Drive thru CUP Amendment – 822 Highway 55 – McDonald’s has requested an amendment to their CUP to expand the drive-thru to a two-lane configuration. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment at the March 8 meeting and recommended approval. The Council adopted a resolution of approval on April 19. The project will now be closed. I) Ditter Heating and Cooling Site Plan Review – 820 Tower Drive – Ditter Heating and Cooling has requested a Site Plan Review for an approximately 5,000 square foot addition to its building. The application is incomplete for review and will be scheduled for a hearing when complete. J) BAPS Site Plan Review – 1400 Hamel Road – Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha (BAPS), Minneapolis, has requested Site Plan Review for construction of a place of assembly. The Planning Commission reviewed at the September 14 meeting and recommended approval. The Council adopted a resolution for approval at the November 16 meeting. The applicant has indicated that they will likely not begin construction until spring. K) Life-Style Auto Condo – South of Hwy 55, west of Pioneer – SH Ventures has requested review of a PUD Concept Plan for development of 12 buildings with approximately 258,000 square feet of space for privately owned garage condos. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and provided comments at the October 12 meeting. The Council reviewed at the November 16 Council meeting and provided comments. The applicant has requested that the City Council remain open, as they are considering potential updates to their Concept Plan. L) Adam’s Pest Control Site Plan Review, Pre Plat, Rezoning – Pioneer Trail Preserve – These projects have been preliminarily approved and the City is awaiting final plat application. M) Caribou Cabin-Pinto Retail, Baker Park Townhomes, Johnson ADU CUP, St. Peter and Paul Cemetery – The City Council has adopted resolutions approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants with the conditions of approval in order to complete the projects. Other Projects A) Uptown Hamel RFP – the City Council approved the RFP for economic development services at the April 5 meeting. Staff is routing the RFP to potential firms. Responses are due in early May. B) Electric Vehicle Charging Regulations – staff is preparing information for review by the Planning Commission and Council pertaining to potential regulations to either require or encourage installation of EV charging infrastructure. The Planning Commission discussed the matter at the April 12 meeting and City Council discussed at the April 19 work session. Staff intends to present a draft ordinance at the May 10 Planning Commission meeting. C) Sign Ordinance – Internal signage on public property – staff is preparing an amendment to the sign ordinance which would clarify that the sign regulations would not apply to scoreboards and similar features internal to city property. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 19 and recommended approval 5-1. Staff intends to present to Council on May 3. D) Wolsfeld Lake Grant – staff has been working with Minnehaha Creek Watershed and WSB to prepare a proposal to the group of watersheds to see if funding can be shifted to another project. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Jason Nelson, Director of Public Safety DATE: April 28, 2022 RE: Police Department Updates We have finally received the departments first ever embedded social worker. The social worker is a full-time employee of Hennepin County Social Service Criminal Justice Behavioral Health Unit. The worker is being shared by seven lake area agencies. The role provides support to assist police and follow up to assist with getting those who need services and resources. The county pays for 80 percent of the wages and the seven departments split the other 20 percent. We are very excited to start this new partnership and are hopeful that this will reduce repetitive calls for service and those in need have another resource for getting the help they need. We are seeing an uptick in theft from autos in the area. Surrounding communities are also noticing this pattern along with residential burglaries. What has been occurring is that groups of individuals come to our area and look for crimes of opportunity. They enter unlocked parked cars in driveways and then utilize the garage door remotes to enter residences. Please remind citizens when talking to them to lock their vehicles in driveways and remove keys from vehicles that are in garages. When doing this you are less likely to be a victim of crime. Last week Officer’s McGill and Jessen conducted the departments’ 1st quarter firearms shoot at the Delano range. We have been utilizing Delano as our main firearms range for over 25 years. It is a great facility that allows us to reserve the entire range for police training. Update on our future Cops and Bobbers program. Officers Vinck and McGill have been very busy meeting with vendors and securing funding and equipment for the program. We are well on our way to create a great outdoor fishing experience for youth with the overarching goal of community policing in mind. In the next few weeks we will present to the council the date, time, and location of the event. I cannot wait to see the final product as things are right on track. Patrol: The following are updates of Patrol Officers between April 14, 2022 and April 27, 2022: Officers issued 27 citations and 49 warnings for various traffic offenses, responded to 1 property damage accident, 11 medicals, 12 suspicious calls, 1 traffic complaint, 15 assists to other agencies, and 8 business/residential alarms. On 04/14/2022 Officers were dispatched to a report of a 1 ½ year old unconscious and possibly not breathing. When officers arrived, they found the child was conscious and being tended to by paramedics. The child was transported to the hospital for evaluation. On 04/15/2022 Officer responded to a forgery report on Settlers Road. Upon arrival officer learned the resident had received a package with someone else’s name but mailed to their address. Officer did some checking and found the name on the package belonged to someone who lived two doors down. It is believed to be an address typo. The neighbor was contacted to retrieve the package. On 04/16/2022 Officers were dispatched to the Hamel Community Center on a report of someone possibly smoking marijuana in the outside restroom. Upon arrival officers did smell the strong odor of marijuana in the area but were unable to determine who had been smoking it. On 04/17/2022 shortly after midnight, officers were dispatched to a disturbance at the Medina Entertainment Center. Upon arrival officers made contact with a female outside who said she had been in a verbal argument with her husband who had left her there. A short time later the male returned. Officers determined no crime had been committed and advised both parties. On 04/18/2022 Officer located a purse in the road along County Road 101. Later that morning officer took a theft from auto report in the Medina Highlands Development and learned that Plymouth had several theft from autos overnight. Property located in the street belonged to one victim, but nothing appeared missing from the purse. On 04/21/2022 Officers along with Hamel Fire Department were dispatched to a report of a child with their head stuck between some stair railings. It was later determined that a small child had tried to crawl through the railing spindles of the steps but his head was too big to go through and was too young to realize he could squeeze back through the other way. The child was assisted with getting out from between the railing. Child was upset but not injured. On 04/26/2022 Officer took a past action theft report from Target. A known suspect stole some iPads from the store and was believed to be responsible for numerous thefts from Targets around the metro area. Case forwarded to Investigations. Officers continue to enforce the weight restrictions. Five trucks were cited for overweight and three trucks were issued civil fines for excessive weight on city streets. Investigations: Investigator is on vacation this week. 1 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: April 28, 2022 MEETING: May 3, 2022 SUBJECT: Public Works Update STREETS • Medina Public Works made another trip to patch Hackamore Road to repair a pavement failure. The east end of the street is in bad shape. • Spring weight restrictions are in effect, it has been a slow thaw and will likely be another week or so until restrictions are lifted. • Street Sweeping is well on its way and the first sweeping will be complete in the next week. • Crack sealing for the year has been completed. Street traffic throughout Medina has increased significantly in comparison to past years which requires staff to focus much more on keeping safe. It is necessary to bring in our temporary help when we are working directly with traffic situations. WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER • I worked out an agreement with the contractor at Weston Woods to replace a failing culvert on Mohawk while they had the street closed for three days to complete utility extensions. Coordinating this project saved the city several thousand dollars in traffic control and mobilization fees. Asphalt repairs will be completed as soon as the plants open. In all there were two sewer crossings, one water crossing, and two culverts replaced in the closure. The larger project will consume staff time with erosion control inspections and infrastructure quality control. • I’ve engaged WSB to get a plan together for a short piece of water main along Chippewa between Polaris and Oakley. This is in the CIP and allows more redundancy to the water service area with the main goal of a secondary line from the treatment plant to the Willow Drive Water Tower. • Public Works held a Chlorine Safety Class instructed by our chemical distributer. The class stressed the importance of chlorine safety for operators and the public, in the event of an emergency. MEMORANDUM 2 PARKS/TRAILS • The new score board for the Paul Fortin Field has been placed on order. • Staff will coordinate a closing date for the new parkland purchase. • We have held a pre-season meeting with the new lawn and grounds maintenance contractor to get them up to speed with HAC and go over expectations. MISC • We are ready for Cleanup Day – 2022! Staff has responded to numerous questions, leaving us to believe we will have a great turnout. ORDER CHECKS APRIL 19, 2022 – MAY 3, 2022 052849 CASH........................................................................................ $358.02 CLEANUP DAY/PETTY CASH 052850 DABADE, PAVAN ..................................................................... $500.00 052851 KANDALA, SRIVANI ................................................................. $500.00 052852 LINDHOLM, PETER ................................................................... $40.13 052853 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ................................................ $22,141.35 052854 MITCHELL, MATT .................................................................... $500.00 052855 MN DEPT OF LABOR/INDUSTRY ......................................... $6,388.52 052856 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC ....................................................... $12.99 052857 NICOLL, DEANNA M ................................................................ $114.16 052858 THOTA, NAGA SIVA PRASAD ................................................. $250.00 052859 AIM ELECTRONICS INC ..................................................... $36,252.00 052860 BURNET TITLE .......................................................................... $32.81 052861 EDINA REALTY ........................................................................ $169.90 052862 VOID ............................................................................................. $0.00 ESCROW DATE TO BE ADJ 052863 OPG-3, INC .............................................................................. $370.00 052864 PRASAD, ROHINI/ANIL ............................................................ $440.00 052865 PREMIUM WATERS INC ............................................................ $25.49 052866 VOID ............................................................................................. $0.00 ESCROW DATE TO BE ADJ 052867 REID, ROBIN ............................................................................ $239.00 052868 SOLHEIM, LEE & LORI .............................................................. $12.27 052869 UNGER, DAVID & COURTNEY .................................................. $25.65 052870 BEAUDRY OIL & PROPANE ................................................. $1,673.50 052871 BERGERSON CASWELL INC. ................................................... $82.50 052872 CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 ............................................... $251.69 052873 CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT CO ................................... $639.64 052874 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP ...................................................... $167.35 052875 ECM PUBLISHERS INC ........................................................... $205.79 052876 FEHN COMPANIES INC ........................................................... $475.40 052877 FERGUSON WATERWORKS .................................................. $351.62 052878 GRAINGER............................................................................... $738.65 052879 GUARDIAN FLEET SUPPLY LLC .......................................... $2,415.01 052880 HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES I ............................... $500.00 052881 HENN CTY CHIEFS POLICE ASSN ......................................... $300.00 052882 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES LLC ............................................ $130.00 052883 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC ........................................................... $130.00 052884 KENNEDY & GRAVEN CHARTERED ................................. $15,863.55 052885 JOSEPH M KITTOK .................................................................. $235.00 052886 LANO EQUIPMENT INC ........................................................... $163.79 052887 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT INC ......................................... $44.00 052888 LORETTO AUTO BODY ...................................................... $13,319.20 052889 MEDINA PROPERTIES INC. ............................................. $750,000.00 052890 MEDTOX LABS ........................................................................ $102.66 052891 METRO ELEVATOR INC .......................................................... $195.00 052892 MN DVS ...................................................................................... $29.75 052893 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ..................................... $304.65 052894 MODERN MARKETING ......................................................... $1,194.51 052895 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC ....................................................... $19.69 052896 NELSON ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR ............................... $22,609.40 052897 NORTHWEST FAMILY PHYSICIANS ....................................... $104.00 052898 OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE CONSULTA ................................. $12.00 052899 SOLUTION BUILDERS INC ................................................... $1,810.69 052900 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY ................................... $1,241.15 052901 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL .............................................................. $645.56 052902 TEGRETE CORP ................................................................... $1,355.00 052903 TIMESAVER OFFSITE ............................................................. $364.13 052904 TITAN MACHINERY ................................................................. $465.75 052905 SSI MN TRANCHE 1 #10322006 ........................................... $3,497.31 052906 SSI MN TRANCHE 3 #10327096 ........................................... $4,956.46 052907 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE ................................................. $35.00 Total Checks $895,001.69 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS APRIL 19, 2022 – MAY 3, 2022 006347E XCEL ENERGY ...................................................................... $6,325.46 006348E PAYMENT SERVICE NETWORK INC .................................... $1,434.02 006349E FP MAILING SOL POSTAGE BY PHON ................................. $1,000.00 006350E AFLAC ....................................................................................... $491.08 006351E MINNESOTA, STATE OF ....................................................... $1,604.00 006352E PR PERA .............................................................................. $19,408.12 006353E PR FED/FICA ....................................................................... $19,084.48 006354E PR MN Deferred Comp ........................................................... $3,034.00 006355E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA .................................................. $4,471.12 006356E CITY OF MEDINA ........................................................................ $26.00 006357E FURTHER .............................................................................. $2,654.37 006358E MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT ............................................. $235.50 006359E ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICE .................................................. $6,841.07 006360E CIPHER LABORATORIES INC. .............................................. $1,122.00 006361E FURTHER ................................................................................... $14.65 006362E CENTERPOINT ENERGY ...................................................... $3,323.18 006363E GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVI ...................................... $178.95 006364E MARCO (LEASE) ....................................................................... $795.61 006365E CITY OF PLYMOUTH ............................................................. $1,036.55 006366E VALVOLINE FLEET SERVICES ................................................ $227.33 006367E WRIGHT HENN COOP ELEC ASSN ...................................... $2,280.21 Total Electronic Checks $75,587.70 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT – APRIL 27, 2022 0511813 BILLMAN, JACKSON CARROLL ............................................... $500.33 0511814 COOK, JUSTIN W ..................................................................... $543.53 0511815 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L. ................................................... $1,137.75 0511816 BARNHART, ERIN A. ............................................................. $2,788.42 0511817 BAUMGARDNER, COLETTE J .................................................. $482.59 0511818 BOECKER, KEVIN D. ............................................................. $2,869.62 0511819 CONVERSE, KEITH A. ........................................................... $2,139.47 0511820 DEMARS, LISA ....................................................................... $1,558.38 0511821 DINGMANN, IVAN W ................................................................. $214.88 0511822 DION, DEBRA A. .................................................................... $2,091.51 0511823 ENDE, JOSEPH...................................................................... $2,008.33 0511824 FINKE, DUSTIN D. ................................................................. $2,869.01 0511825 GLEASON, JOHN M. .............................................................. $1,977.22 0511826 GREGORY, THOMAS ............................................................ $1,981.81 0511827 HALL, DAVID M. ..................................................................... $2,184.89 0511828 HANSON, JUSTIN .................................................................. $2,452.78 0511829 JACOBSON, NICOLE ................................................................ $909.85 0511830 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S. .......................................................... $2,536.31 0511831 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. ............................................................ $2,273.17 0511832 KLAERS, ANNE M. ................................................................. $1,616.29 0511833 LEUER, GREGORY J. ............................................................ $2,149.54 0511834 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. .................................................. $1,473.74 0511835 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D .......................................................... $2,172.95 0511836 NELSON, JASON ................................................................... $2,795.93 0511837 RATKE, TREVOR J ................................................................ $1,950.19 0511838 REINKING, DEREK M ............................................................ $2,327.13 0511839 RUTH, BRENDA L. ................................................................. $1,612.91 0511840 SCHARF, ANDREW ............................................................... $4,861.55 0511841 SCHERER, STEVEN T. .......................................................... $2,527.21 0511842 VINCK, JOHN J ...................................................................... $1,930.76 0511843 VOGEL, NICHOLE .................................................................. $1,036.12 0511844 WALKER, CAITLYN M. ........................................................... $1,872.48 0511845 BURSCH, JEFFREY ............................................................... $1,150.43 Total Payroll Direct Deposit $62,997.08