HomeMy Public PortalAboutMinutes_CCSpecialMeeting_06282016SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
IONA COMMUNITY CENTER
JUNE 28, 2016 — 7:00 P.M.
PRESENT: Mayor Brad Andersen, Council Member Rob Geray, Council President Dan Gubler,
Council Member Kathy McNamara, Council Member Dan Garren, Public Works Director Zech
Prouse, Attorney Dale Storer, Chief of Police Karl Bowcutt, and City Clerk Shara Roberts.
ABSENT: None.
VISITORS: Marvin Fielding, Greg Hansen, Terry McNamara, Louise Bryan, Vicki Burnham,
Jerry & Joann Hansen.
Mayor Andersen welcomed everyone and Council Member McNamara led with the Pledge of
Allegiance. A roll call was taken to open the meeting.
Mayor Andersen entertained a motion. Council Member Garren moved to add to the agenda the
discussion of residential pools and renting the city park for a fundraiser to the post register.
Council President second the motion. All in favor, motion carried.
Consent Agenda: Council Minutes of May 18, 2016 had been reviewed. Council reviewed the
finance reports for the period ending May 31, 2016 (67% of the fiscal year elapsed). The City
had $999,208.63 in the bank and routine bills had been paid. Mayor Andersen noted the FY2017
proposed budget provided by Treasurer Sullivan for review.
Mayor Andersen entertained a motion. Council Member Geray moved to approve the consent
agenda as presented. Council Member McNamara seconded the motion. All in favor, motioned
carried.
Items of Business:
Preliminary Plat Application for Thomasville Estates Subdivision — Rockwell Homes —
Public Hearing — 7:15 p.m.: Mayor Andersen explained the public hearing process and asked
representatives to present the application.
Kurt Roland with Eagle Rock Engineering located at 1330 Fremont Avenue in Idaho Falls, ID
explained he was representing Rockwell Homes for the proposed Thomasville Estates
Subdivision. He commented the preliminary plat consists of 110 '/z - acre lots with sidewalks and
drainage swells. He noted curb and gutter was not part of the proposal. He further described
establishing a three way intersection at Rushton Road and Olsen Avenue.
Greg Hansen the Vice President of Rockwell Homes located at 5659 Veil Drive in Ammon, ID
expressed they really wanted to make this development as positive as possible for the City of
Iona. They decided to go in with larger lots as it would be more accommodating to what the City
of Iona has expressed they prefer on past developments. He explained it has also been suggested
to change the name from Thomasville Estates to Willow Creek Subdivision and name the streets
after the early pioneers. Mr. Hansen expressed they were not opposed to making those changes.
1
Mr. Hansen discussed some of the challenges that exist in planning the new development which
were establishing proper infrastructure and supplying water. He explained in regards to
establishing infrastructure they look to professional recommendations and what is already in
place. He referenced the review letter by City Engineer Paul Scoresby with Schiess & Associates
dated June 3, 2016. He explained they understood water is a precious commodity for the City of
Iona right now, and they have a couple of suggestions on how they could help accommodate that.
First option is to have Rockwell Homes pay up front the $3,000 water connection fee for each lot
for a total of approximately $330,000 to put towards constructing a new pump house. Second
option is establish a secondary irrigation system.
Mayor Andersen opened the public portion of the hearing; those in favor, none; neutral one;
opposed two.
Alban Hatch located at 4201 N. Rushton Circle expressed appreciation towards the larger lots
and larger homes to help balance out some of the other development happening in the area. Mr.
Hatch explained he owns the ground contiguous to the east side of the proposed subdivision
which is approximately 280 feet wide. He expressed plans to develop the land in the future and
was concerned when the development does go there is a street which goes from the west to the
east connecting the ground between Iona Road and the subdivision which will only leave
approximately 110 feet on each side of the road with the required 70 foot right away. As a result
it will only allow for smaller lots because of the way the land is laid out. Mr. Hatch suggested
perhaps fewer streets from the west to the east would allow for larger lots to be developed on his
12 acres and should be considered in the final plat proposal for Thomasville Estates.
Jerry Hansen located at 5041 N. 55 E. expressed opposition towards the proposed development
and shared concerns regarding increased traffic flow into the City. He explained if there is one
access road out on 49th (Telford Road) and two access roads on Main Street and Olsen Street
from his perspective the traffic would be diverted into the City. He further explained 49th
(Telford Road) is designated to be a 5 lane highway in the future. Mr. Hansen also expressed
concerns about safety for the school kids that walk to and from school.
Mayor Andersen requested Clerk Roberts enter into the record Bryce Contor's written response.
Mr. Contor expressed opposition towards the proposed development, "Exhibit A.
Greg Hansen Vice President of Rockwell Homes asked questions in regards to Mr. Hatch's
contiguous property for clarification. Mr. Hatch explained his 12 acres of land is only 280 feet
wide and runs the length of the proposed subdivision from south to north. As a result of
Rockwell's preliminary plat for Thomasville Estates and the way the streets are outlined it will
probably only leave room for smaller lots perhaps patio homes to be developed on his land. Mr.
Hansen acknowledged it was a valid concern and explained the layout of streets are taken from
recommendations of professionals, but they are open to traffic studies and other suggestions.
Louise Bryan located at 5439 Steele asked Mr. Hansen to outline all of the access roads of the
proposed development. Mr. Hansen explained on the corner of Olsen Street and Rushton Road it
would turn into a three way stop and would continue north into the subdivision and on Main
2
Street it would connect straight into the subdivision and would continue to 49th (Telford Road).
Ms. Bryan inquired why they are only proposing one access point off of 49th (Telford Road).
Mr. Roland with Eagle Rock Engineering explained the reason for proposing one access road off
of 49th (Telford Road) opposed to two is because of a right hand turn lane which requires 300
feet. If they were to put two access roads in they wouldn't have the required 300 feet which
would be a safety issue for traffic coming off of 49th
Mr. Roland commented in regards to the safety of the school kids there is state funding the City
can work with Safe Routes to School to obtain.
Mayor Andersen closed the public portion of the hearing.
Council Member Garren inquired what the total width of the property is on its north boundary
from east to west. Mr. Roland responded it was 1402.75 feet. Council Member Garren discussed
revising the plat to allow for two access roads off of 49th (Telford Road) and there being
adequate room to allow for that. He expressed the biggest complaint they have heard is the
increased traffic in the City. Council President Gubler agreed with Council Member Garren there
shouldn't be a problem to create two access points off of 49th (Telford Road) and still have more
than 300 feet for a right hand turn lane. He expressed he would like to see those two roads
contiguous to the already existing city streets as it would help elevate congestion and allow for
more outlets. Mr. Hansen expressed it is definitely something to consider. Mayor Andersen
recommended seeking council from the Bonneville Metropolitan Planning Organization
(BMPO).
Mayor Andersen asked if the representatives had an opportunity to review the letter from Schiess
& Associates dated June 3, 2016 which outlines the findings and conclusions. Representatives
acknowledged they did. Mayor Andersen expressed a lot of the items the City Engineer
addressed in his letter will be what the City will be considering.
Public Works Director Prouse inquired if Rockwell Homes had received approval from Iona
Bonneville Sewer District (IBSD). Mr. Hansen responded they did talk with IBSD which gave
them a verbal approval, but still need to get written approval as they move forward. Director
Prouse inquired if IBSD outlined the need for any lift stations. Mr. Roland responded they have
measured elevations for this particular project which will not require a lift station.
Mayor Andersen inquired if installing fencing along the back side of each property was
something Rockwell was willing to do. Mr. Hansen responded normally they do not install
fences but will on occasion when there is a safety issue such as a lot close to canal. He further
explained they like to leave that up to the buyer. However, they do establish subdivision
covenants for uniformity. Mayor Andersen referenced developments along Iona Road where
fences have been installed. Mr. Hansen responded they have installed fences on busy roads. He
acknowledged 49th is a busy road and if that is a recommendation from the City they will
consider that. Chief Bowcutt expressed concerns 49th (Telford Road) has a fast speed limit and
from his perspective is a safety issue.
3
Mayor Andersen inquired in regards to the recommendation for a new pump house at the north
east corner of the subdivision if Rockwell was willing to give one or two lots to accommodate
that. Mr. Hansen responded absolutely.
Mayor Andersen inquired in regards to changing the name to Willow Creek Subdivision and
naming the streets after the first pioneers if Rockwell Homes was willing to make that change.
Mr. Hansen expressed he thought that was a great idea.
Director Prouse suggested if Main Street was connected to reconstruct it from Steele Avenue and
remove the existing chip seal because the condition it is in now is not going to support any
additional traffic. Mr. Hansen expressed that is something they would have to look into and
calculate costs.
Council President Gubler asked for clarification if Rockwell Homes would be incurring the cost
to rework the three way intersection at Rushton Road and Olsen Avenue. The representatives
acknowledged that was correct.
Director Prouse asked if they had any additional information on a secondary irrigation system.
Mr. Hansen expressed there are a couple of things they are struggling with in regards to it. He
explained they looked at several other cities and counties in the area for a model of secondary
irrigation systems that are working and haven't found one yet. However, there is a model out of
Kaysville, UT which has shown success. Additionally, the cost is high to establish the
infrastructure. He explained the owner of Rockwell Homes Paul Johnson had a really good idea
for consideration. He suggested instead of Rockwell Homes putting the cost into constructing
infrastructure for a secondary irrigation system, to apply those funds towards the new well for
the City of Iona, which would be in addition to the regular water connection fees. Director
Prouse commented it will not solve the problem long term.
Director Prouse inquired if Rockwell Homes was willing to contribute additional funds if the
requirement for a secondary irrigation system was abandoned. Mr. Hansen expressed everything
discussed tonight would have to be taken back and outlined in detail to see if it makes financial
sense. Director Prouse inquired if they would be opposed to putting water meters on the new
subdivision. Mr. Hansen expressed no as they have done it in other subdivisions.
Mr. Hansen inquired where the City was at this time in being able to accept another 110 '/2 acre
lots to the water system. Council President Gubler explained the City is in the middle of
negotiating a purchase of water rights and their ability to accept this development is contingent
upon that. Mayor Andersen commented without water rights, secondary irrigation, or installation
of water meters on the new development, the City can't support the development since it has to
provide for its existing customers first.
Council President Gubler expressed the City should know relatively quickly within the next
couple of months whether they will be able to successfully acquire the additional water rights,
and asked if Rockwell would be willing to take the suggestions presented by the City Council
and Planning and Zoning to incorporate into a revised plat and meet in a work session to outline
any other details. Mr. Hansen expressed he was open to that idea.
4
Mr. Hansen expressed he would prefer not to table it as it would require going through the public
hearing process again and suggested the preliminary plat be approved with conditions imposed
as an indication of what the City Council is looking for so they can move in forward in that
direction.
Mayor Andersen expressed he did not have an issue with that as long as Rockwell understood the
biggest issue is water and the preliminary plat would be contingent upon that.
Council President Gubler inquired which part of the land would first be developed. Mr. Hansen
explained the plan was to start on the south end of the development. Council Member McNamara
expressed to Mr. Hansen they would prefer the construction start on the north end of the land to
avoid the construction going through the City. Council Member Geray suggested a construction
rough road from north to south to alleviate contractors driving through the City. Mr. Hansen
explained they can certainly make a construction rough road but legally they can't require
contractors to use it because they are public roads.
Mr. Hansen asked for clarification if the traffic study was something they needed to hire
someone to conduct or if the City was going to hire someone to do the traffic study. Council
Member Geray outlined to Mr. Hansen it should be conducted according to the review letter
prepared by Paul Scoresby with Schiess & Associates.
Mayor Andersen entertained a motion. Council Member Geray moved to approve the
preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1) full alignment with the Schiess &
Associates recommendations and conclusions as they have outlined in their June 3, 2016
correspondence, including specifically the traffic study to be reviewed by BMPO, 2) changes to
the plat as discussed with Council President Gubler regarding pushing Main Street and Olsen
Street all the way through to the north end of the plat, and 3) contingent upon results of water
rights acquisition with other additional details to be sorted out later. Council President Gubler
seconded the motion. The approval of the preliminary plat Exhibit `B", was taken by a roll call
vote:
Council Member Geray: YES Council President Gubler: YES
Council Member Garren: YES Council Member McNamara: YES
De -annexation Request: Jerry Hansen located at 5041 N. 55 E. explained he is requesting his
property be de -annexed from the City of Iona so he can return it back to Bonneville County and
rezone it from residential to agricultural, Exhibit C. Mr. Hansen expressed since his land was
annexed into the City, and he started making plans to develop it and has discovered the costs he
is going to incur, it is not worth it. Mr. Hansen explained he approached the City Council about
this during last month's meeting and they recommended he take it first in front of Planning and
Zoning. Mr. Hansen explained from his perspective during that meeting they didn't come up
with any answers and kicked him back to the City Council. Clerk Roberts clarified Planning and
Zoning's recommendation was to go back and hold a public hearing since it is a land issue.
Attorney Storer inquired if Mr. Hansen considered leaving it in the City's boundaries and
rezoning it back to agricultural. Mr. Hansen responded what he would really like to do with the
property is build a house above it. Attorney Storer explained to Mr. Hansen he wouldn't have the
5
issues with water, sewer, and access if you put it back into agricultural with a single family
home. Mr. Hansen expressed he would be willing to leave it in the City boundaries and rezone it
back to agricultural.
Mayor Andersen acknowledged when Mr. Hansen requested annexation the cart was put before
the horse so to speak, as they were trying to make accommodations for Mr. Hansen and it was a
good lesson learned on both sides.
Mayor Andersen inquired if a public hearing would need to be held to rezone the land. Attorney
Storer responded yes. Mr. Hansen inquired if it was going to cost him another $400.00 fee for
that process. Mayor Andersen informed Mr. Hansen the City would pay for it.
After further discussion, it was decided a public hearing would be held at the next meeting for
Mr. Hansen to request rezoning his land from residential back to agricultural.
Discussion and Approval of Bid for Water Tank Project — Keller Associates: Marvin
Fielding with Keller Associates announced they held open bids for the water tank improvement
on May 26th and received one bid. He explained there was other interest earlier on, but because
of the intent for qualifications to capture the specialties of this project they were not able to
participate. The award went to Steele Design, LLC and DN Tanks as the subcontractor. The total
bid was $154,203.
Mr. Fielding discussed the cracks on the wall of the tank and explained the original presentation
to the City Council suggested injecting those from the exterior with pressure grout. However,
right before the bid DN Tanks approached Keller Associates with a recommendation to first seal
all the cracks from the inside and grout from the exterior because there is still a chance the water
could get to the reinforcing steel on the inside. Mr. Fielding commented if the City Council were
to go that route it would cost an additional $25,000.
Mayor Andersen opened a discussion regarding the type of roofing material that would be used
on the project. Council President Gubler inquired if the Thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) was
recommended as the best option. Mr. Fielding acknowledged that was correct.
Mayor Andersen asked what the recoat interior piping was for $3,125. Mr. Fielding explained it
is in regards to the overflow piping where there is rust developing. He further explained initially
it wasn't presented to the City Council, but came through as a recommendation from the bid.
Council President Gubler asked when construction would begin. Mr. Fielding explained the plan
is to begin work in September when the high water usage months have ended.
Mayor Andersen entertained a motion. Council Member Geray moved to approve the bid as
presented plus the $25,000 for the interior crack repair, plus the $14,486 for the TPO membrane
roofing material, and the $3,125 for the recoating of the interior piping for a grand total of
$196,814. Council Member McNamara seconded the motion. The bid for the water tank Exhibit
"D", was approved by a roll call vote:
Council Member Geray: YES Council President Gubler: YES
6
Council Member Garren: YES Council Member McNamara: YES
Discussion of Amending Sections 8-2-3 and 8-2-27 Relating to the Management and
Control of the City's Water System and the Authority to Place Water Meters: Mayor
Andersen explained during the City Council meeting held on March 15th, 2016 the Council
determined not to pass a proposed ordinance change during a public hearing due to verbiage
which still needed to be worked through. He asked Attorney Storer to incorporate some of the
language changes which were discussed during that meeting since the final decision was they
would look at the language in more detail and get back with them. Mayor Andersen explained he
would like to have a discussion and gather input on the additional verbiage, Exhibit E.
Council President Gubler asked Attorney Storer to clarify what the advisory vote would allow.
Attorney Storer explained it would essentially give the City Council guidance on what the
citizens wanted, but does not bind the City Council to do anything. Attorney Storer outlined
subsection 8 of the ordinance which includes a notice provision in which the habitual waster
would have an opportunity to appear before the City Council and explain their situation before a
meter was put on.
Mayor Andersen commented he recalled the biggest issue with the previous proposed verbiage
changes is it wouldn't give the City Council the ability to deal with a single habitual water
waster as it would require going out for a vote. Council President Gubler acknowledged that was
correct, but explained the City hasn't defined what waste is.
Director Prouse commented after this summer the City may be closer in being able to gather
enough data to determine what the average use is for each lot size. Director Prouse reported
based on the numbers which have been recorded since the installation of the data meters several
homes are above the average unnecessarily.
Mayor Andersen noted one of the biggest things that came out of the Water Committee was not
installing water meters, but increasing enforcement efforts.
Council President Gubler suggested tabling this topic for discussion until the necessary data has
been collected to define what waste is and at that time come up for a solution regarding
enforcement. Director Prouse commented he would bring the readings which have been collected
so far for review to a future meeting.
Mayor Andersen asked when the 25 data collection meters were installed. Director Prouse
responded March lst, 2016. Council President Gubler and Director Prouse discussed the majority
of the usable data will be collected at the end of the highest usage months so it wouldn't be
necessary to wait for an entire year and could begin discussion as early as Fall of 2016.
After further discussion, it was determined discussions defining what waste is would be tabled
until appropriate data was collected.
Quitclaim Deed — Shane Williams & Julie Buckwalter: Mayor Andersen explained the
intention of this quitclaim deed is to correct an improper quitclaim deed which was done
previously to Kevin and Renee Oswald. He further explained the public right-of-way was
7
quitclaim instead of a piece of private property to the previous homeowners and the new
homeowners Shane Williams & Julie Buckwalter brought it to the City's attention.
Mayor Andersen entertained a motion. Council President Gubler moved to approve the
amendment of ordinance number 104, ordinances of the City of Iona, Idaho; repealing section 9
of such ordinance; vacating a portion of Dayton street in the City of Iona, Idaho; authorizing and
directing the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute and deliver on behalf of the City a quitclaim
deed vacating a portion of Dayton street in the City of Iona conveying the vacated street to the
homeowner of the adjacent land, and naming them; providing for effective date of ordinance.
Council Member Garren seconded the motion. Approval of the amendment and quitclaim deed
Exhibit "F" was approved by a roll call vote:
Council Member Geray: YES Council President Gubler: YES
Council Member Garren: YES Council Member McNamara: YES
2015 Water Quality Report: Mayor Andersen presented the 2015 Water Quality Report which
is required to be done by July 1st of every year, Exhibit G. He reported the City received no
violations for 2015. He noted two corrections and asked Clerk Roberts to make those. Mayor
Andersen noted the 2015 Water Quality Report is available in the City office and on the City
website for review.
Discussion and Review of Continuation of Water Committee: Mayor Andersen reported this
was discussed earlier during the City Council Work Meeting. He explained the Water Committee
has been working for over a year now to list priorities for the City Council to move forward on.
For the time being, the Water Committee would discontinue until it was necessary to reinstate it
similar to 2008.
Mayor Andersen entertained a motion. Council Member Garren moved to disband the Water
Committee based on the completion of the objectives for this period of time and acknowledged
appreciation for the citizens who fulfilled that duty and will remain disbanded until necessary to
reestablish it again. Council McNamara second the motion. Approval to disband the Water
Committee was approved by a roll call vote:
Council Member Geray: YES Council President Gubler: YES
Council Member Garren: YES Council Member McNamara: YES
Discussion and Approval of Ralph Steele Property: Mayor Andersen reported the family will
sell the property for $35,000 with the stipulation the City name it historically after the Steele
family. He explained potential uses for the future could be for t-ball, another quiet park, senior
center, or new city office.
Mayor Andersen entertained a motion. Council Member Geray made a motion to purchase the
property for $35,000 and committing to name it after the Steele Family. Council President
Gubler seconded the motion. Approval to purchase the Ralph Steele Family property was
approved by a roll call vote:
Council Member Geray: YES Council President Gubler: YES
8
Council Member Garren: YES Council Member McNamara: YES
Attorney Storer clarified a purchase agreement should be drafted, and brought back to City
Council for final review and approval.
Discussion and Approval of Payment Arrangements for Water Rights Acquisition: Mayor
Andersen reported this topic would be tabled for future discussion.
Discussion and Appointment of Michael Thompson for Planning and Zoning Commission:
Mayor Andersen introduced Michael Thompson and explained he approached him a few weeks
ago regarding opportunities to get involved in the community. With the recent vacancy on the
Planning and Zoning Commission, Mayor Andersen let Mr. Thompson know there was an
opportunity to serve his community and asked him if he was interested.
Michael Thompson located at 3069 Sawmill Circle explained he has lived in the City of Iona
since February of 2014 with his wife and kids and is employed at Melaleuca. Mr. Thompson
expressed he would like to get involved with the City his family has decided to settle down in.
Mayor Andersen explained to Mr. Thompson the discussion would need to go in front of the
Planning and Zoning Commission first to receive a recommendation and then back to City
Council for final approval of his appointment. Mayor Andersen informed Mr. Thompson the
next Planning and Zoning meeting was scheduled for Wednesday July 13tn
Discussion of New City Code — Construction Ordinance: Council Member Geray reported
this was discussed during the work meeting. He explained Chief Bowcutt brought up issues
which have been occurring with Rockwell Homes starting work very early and disturbing the
peace in the Country Haven subdivision and wanted to explore having a city code which covered
start and stop times for construction work. Council Member Geray further explained Chief
Bowcutt believes there is an existing code which outlines start and stop times from Bonneville
County.
Attorney Storer noted Bonneville County's ordinances do not apply to the City of Iona. He
recommended the City not adopt an ordinance which prohibits construction work before a certain
time and use the existing nuisance ordinance which prohibits engaging in any activity which
disturbs the peace and tranquility of the neighborhood. Director Prouse noted the nuisance
ordinance could be found in Title 5, Chapter 8, and Subsection 1.
July 4tn Parade Discussion: Mayor Andersen reported this topic was discussed during the work
meeting, and explained an individual contacted him with interest to organize a 4tn of July parade.
However, it was determined there wasn't enough time to plan for such an event but would be
potentially interested next year.
Iona Days Discussion: Mayor Andersen reported this agenda item was discussed during the
work meeting.
Street Tree Discussion: Mayor Andersen reported this agenda item was discussed during the
work meeting.
9
Discussion of Residential Pools: Mayor Andersen explained he was approached by a citizen
with a concern regarding the large pools in the City that do not have fences around them. The
citizen expressed they could be dangerous to children and recommended an ordinance regulation.
Council President Gubler commented it was a slippery slope. Attorney Storer agreed with
Council President Gubler and further explained once the duty has been assumed then there are
obligations and liability associated with such. After further discussion, it was determined an
ordinance regulation was not necessary as it is the responsibility of the parents to watch their
children.
Discussion of Renting City Park for Post Registers NIE Group: Mayor Andersen explained
the City was approached by the Post Register to rent the whole park for a non-profit fundraising
organization called Newspaper in Education (NIE). It would include a run and activities
throughout the whole day. He further explained they asked what the cost would be to rent out the
entire park and if the City was interested in being a sponsor. After further discussion, it was
determined to charge them for both shelters as they have done for other citizens in the past and
make sure they understand the expectation of cleaning up. Additionally, it was determined the
City was not interested in being a sponsor at this time.
Reports:
No Reports.
Meeting adjourned at 9:34 p.m.
COUNCIL APPROVED: July 19th, 2016
ATTES
Shara Roberts, City Cler
Brad Andersen, Mayor
10
City of Iona Finance Worksheet - Banks Page: 1
Period: 05/16 Jun 13, 2016 01:14PM
ellReport Criteria:
Print Source Titles
Total by Source
Print Department Titles
Total by Department
All Segments Tested for Total Breaks
[Report].Account Number ="011050","101175,"101221","101231","511200","511222","511232","511252","101242","511211"
Prior month 2 Prior month 2015-16
Current year
Account Number Account Title Actual
01-1050 CHECKING - COMMERCE BANK
10-1175 INVESTMENTS -COMMERCE -GENERA
10-1221 ZIONS - GENERAL INVESTMENTS
10-1231 KEY BANK GENERAL INVESTMENTS
10-1242 WESTMARK CD --GENERAL
51-1200 INVESTMENTS -COMMERCE WATER
51-1211 WESTMARK CD -WATER
51-1222 ZIONS - WATER iNVESTMENTS
51-1232 KEY BANK WATER INVESTMENTS
51-1252 ZIONS BANK --WATER INVESTMENTS
Net Grand Totals:
64,864.92 93,825.60 52,906.17
128, 649.81 128, 658.25 128, 666.97
58,384.83 58,404.78 58,426.81
157, 942.17 157, 944.76 157, 947.43
51,239.77 51,239.77 51,239.77
247,797.77 247,814.02 247,830.81
53,207.28 53,207.28 53,207.28
44,041.07 44,054.95 44,070.27
52,647.39 52,648.25 52,649.14
152,158.24 152, 208.50 152, 263.98
1,010,933.25 1,040,006.16 999,208.63
City of lona Check Register - lona Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 5/1/2016 - 5/31/2016 Jun 08, 2016 10:45AM
roReport Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GL Period Check Issue Date Check Number
Payee
Description GL Account Amount
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
05/16
17 05/16
05/16
05/03/2016
05/03/2016
05/04/2016
05/04/2016
05/09/2016
05/09/2016
05/09/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
05/17/2016
05/17/2016
05/20/2016
05/23/2016
05/23/2016
05/24/2016
05/25/2016
05/25/2016
05/25/2016
05/25/2016
05/25/2016
05/25/2016
05/25/2016
05/25/2016
05/25/2016
05/25/2016
05/25/2016
05/25/2016
05/25/2016
05/25/2016
05/25/2016
05/25/2016
14058 AMERITITLE
14059 LISPS
14060 SUZANNE ULBRICH -- Son Eats // Pru jet: t"
14061 BRENT PURCELL
14079 ALLEN ELDRIDGE
14080 GREG MCBRIDE
14081 JOSE ESCOBAR
14084 AAA SEWER SERVICE
14085 AMERICAN PUMP
14086 BATTERIES PLUS BULBS #209
14087 BMC
14088 CASELLE, INC.
14089 EVCO HOUSE OF HOSE
14090 FALLS PLUMBING SUPPLY, INC.
14091 H.D. FOWLER CO.
14092 INTERMOUNTAIN GAS CO.
14093 NAPA AUTO PARTS
14094 NETBACK, LLC
14095 PACIFIC STEEL - IDAHO FALLS
14096 PC PLUS
14097 POST REGISTER
14098 PSI ENVIRONMENTAL
14099 SAM'S CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANK
14100 SCHIESS & ASSOCIATES
14101 TETON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
14102 THE UPS STORE 1
14103 UNITED MAILING DIRECT'S Wafer iteMsehtS
14104 VALLEY READY MIX
14105 VERIZON WIRELESS
14106 WESTERN STATES EQUIPMENT
14107 YELLOWSTONE LUMBER LLC
14108 CITY OF POCATELLO
14109 ANGIE OR RICHARD BLACK
14110 STEVE CAVERHILL
14111 IONA LION'S CLUB
14120 ALLEN ELDRIDGE
14121 GREG MCBRIDE
14122 USPS CAY'Vv te.a Vno‘Itn 35
14127 CABLE ONE
14128 DRACO EQUIPMENT, INC.
14129 FREMONT COMMUNICATIONS
14130 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
14131 IONA FOOD MART
14132 KELLER ASSOCIATES
14133 PEAK ALARM
14134 PORTERS OFFICE PRODUCTS
14135 PRO EQUIPMENT SALES, LLC
14136 PRO RENTALS & SALES, INC
14137 ROCKY MTN. POWER
14138 SUNNYSIDE GARDENS
14139 TETON MICROBIOLOGY LAB
14140 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
14141 WEX BANK Pal ce 304.51,
14142 SASHA BELLISTON
Lot Book Guarantee 5411 Free, S 104150
MAILING WATER STATEMENTS 514150
Restore City Signs front lawn 104710
ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS 104720
Building inspections 104720
Mechanical lnspections 104720
Top soil for lona Museum lawn 104780
Pumped Park Bathrooms 104710
Re -build #2 Pump 514820
Batteries: (2) Flashing school lgts 104690
Park Stage renovation 104820
CONTRACT SUPPORT 104150
Hydraulic hose, fittings, etc. & cre 104710
City Park maint. 104710
Replace culvert -Right of Ways 104820
Natural gas 104175
Dump Truck part 104710
Office PCs backup 514150
2-Slide checks for Irrigation canal 104710
Police PC -IT services 104690
PH-P&Z Hart (2nd) -AI I Imo- h'I.1$ 104155
Garbage pick up 514710
Membership fees 104150
Hart Replat (2nd time) legal Oswa 104163
Police -equipment repairs on truck 104690
BUILDING INSPECTION FORMS 104720
City addressed envelopes 514150
Concrete for Stage Floor 104820
Cell phones 104960
Backhoe Maintenance/accessory 104730
City Park Stage renovation 104820
1ttj4itrRite Leaae 513620
Reimburse Credit on Water accou 011075
Reimburse credit on Water accou 011075
All equipment, 3 Grills -in storage s 104790
Building inspections 104720
Mechanical lnspections 104720
Thomasville Estates -Pre. Plat cert 104150
Internet 104150
Stage renovation -lift trusses 104730
TELEPHONE 104150
Stage Renovation 104820
Misc. supplies 104710
Design Services 80% 514180
Qtrly Security alarm monitoring 104150
Office supplies 514150
Weed eater serviced 104730
Sod Cutter rental -Pioneer Park 104710
Street Lights 4 MI Po4)f'r 104175
2 Trees -Arbor Day 104820
Water tests 514710
CLEANING SUPPLIEEgS. 104710
+P Public Works -Fuel 32-4. 1 104710
2016 lona Day Advance 104770
75.00 M
361.90 M
299.33
720.00
540.00
180.00
120.00
255.00
17,654.27
27.99
770.57
273.00
18.36
118.13
2,431.20
258.46
2.66
75.00
189.40
90.00
162.98
102.14
100.00
1,950.00
221.53
71.50
457.50
315.00
239.57
650.66
2,547.59
1,400.00
18.39
25.00
1,500.00
831.00
410.00
147.03 M
119.00
185.00
218.88
843.74
7.67
3,114.00
109.95
220.76
179.24
69.79
4,166.81
549.19
100.00
46.98
633.70
500.00
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
Dates: Account Total
5/01 thru 5/31/2016
Clerk
Police
Council Misc. & Google email management 10-41-50 58.36
Google email management 51-41-50 25.50
Cleaning supplies (for Police) 10-46-90 11.28
MYAC dinner mtg. 10-47-60 46.50
Employee Qtr. Mtg. Breakfast 10-47-90 97.24
Digital Voice recorder 10-46-90 129.99
Public Works Splash Pad part
10-47-10 4.88
TOTAL 373.75
GL Account
Detest
Credit
Proof
Grand Totals:
Dated:
Mayor:
City Council:
01-1075
01-2010
10-2010
10-41-50
10-41-55
10-41-63
10-41-75
10-46-90
10.47-10
10-47-20
10.47-30
10-47-70
10-47-80
10-47-90
10-48-20
10-49-60
51-2010
51-36-20
51-41-50
51-41-75
51-41-80
51-47-10
51-48-20
43.39
.00
.00
1,063.96
162.98
1,950.00
1,176.65
752.72
1,982.74
2,785.97
1,014.90
500.00
120.00
1,500.00
6,671.52
43.64
.00
1,400.00
1,152.88
3,248.62
3,114.00
336.63
17,654.27
.00
43.39-
19,725.08-
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
00
.00
.00
.00
.00
28,908.40-
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
43.39
43.39-
19,725.08-
1, 083.96
162.98
1,950.00
1,176.65
752.72
1,982.74
2,785.97
1,014.90
500.00
120.00
1,500.00
6,671.52
43.64
26,906.40-
1,400.00
1,152.88
3,248.82
3,114.00
338.63
17,654.27
48,874.87
46,674.87-
00
Lito rncaidnv
�a
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
TAX REVENUE
10-31-10 PROPERTY TAX REVENUE
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
LICENSES & PERMITS
10-32-20 BEER & DOG LICENSES
TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
CITY OF IONA
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2016
GENERAL FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT
1,427.53 148,657.06 244,000.00 95,342.94 60.9
1,427.53 148,657.06 244,000.00 95,342.94 60.9
35.00 454.00 700.00 246.00 64.9
35.00 454.00 700.00 246.00 64.9
10-33-10 STATE LIQUOR TAX .00 40,362.00 78,213.00 37,851.00 51.6
10-33-20 STATE REVENUE SHARING 6,296.20 74,094.00 93,557.00 19,463.00 79.2
10-33-30 STATE HIGHWAY USERS .00 64,709.63 79,705.00 14,995.37 81.2
10-33-40 POLICE REVENUE 993.60 3,337.15 9,660.00 6,322.85 34.6
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 7,289.80 182,502.78 261,135.00 78,632.22 69.9
CHARGES FOR SERVICE
10-34-10 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES 1,377.00 42,792.50 74,000.00 31,207.50 57.8
10-34-20 CABLE TV FRANCHISE 1,328.00 4,318.00 8,700.00 4,382.00 49.6
10-34-30 NATURAL GAS FRANCHISE 5,469.29 8,863.24 13,000.00 4,136.76 68.2
10-34-40 POWER FRANCHISE .00 18,117.27 27,000.00 8,882.73 67.1
TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE 8,174.29 74,091.01 122,700.00 48,608.99 60.4
OTHER REVENUE
10-36-10 INTEREST 33.42 602.31 1,300.00 697.69 46.3
10-36-50 BUILDING RENT 300.00 7,985.00 13,500.00 5,515.00 59.2
10-36-60 MYAC REVENUE .00 28.00 1,000.00 972.00 2.8
10-36-70 IONA DAY REVENUE .00 .00 2,000.00 2,000.00 .0
10-36-80 MUSEUM .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0
10-36-90 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 854.96 5,844.00 8,000.00 2,156.00 73.1
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 1,188.38 14,459.31 26,800.00 12,340.69 54.0
RECREATION REVENUE
10-37-50 RECREATION FEES 715.00 68,180.03 73,600.00 5,419.97 92.6
10-37-60 SHELTER RENTAL 125.00 240.00 1,600.00 1,360.00 15.0
TOTAL RECREATION REVENUE 840.00 68,420.03 75,200.00 6,779.97 91.0
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY
67 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 06/13/2016 12:29PM PAGE: 1
CITY OF IONA
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2016
GENERAL FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
10-38-20 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .00 .00 45,000.00 45,000.00 .0
TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .00 .00 45,000.00 45.000.00 .0
RESERVES
10.39-50 RESERVES .00 .00 163,043.00 163,043.00 .0
TOTAL RESERVES .00 .00 163,043.00 163,043.00 .0
TOTAL FUND REVENUE
18,955.00 488,584.19 938,578.00 449,993.81 52.1
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY
67 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 06/13/2016 12:29PM PAGE: 2
CITY OF IONA
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2016
GENERAL FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
ADMINISTRATION
10-41-10 PAYROLL 11,846.15 82,215.09 157,220.00 75,004.91 52.3
10-41-20 PAYROLL TAXES 1,120.84 8,606.79 17,750.00 9,143.21 48.5
1041-30 RETIREMENT 1,146.69 9,571.99 18,742.00 9,170.01 51.1
10-4140 HEALTH INSURANCE 2,209.34 17,713.02 30,000.00 12,286.98 59.0
10-41-50 OFFICE EXPENSE 1,122.32 8,992.03 15,800.00 6,807.97 56.9
10-41-55 PUBLISHING 162.98 720.50 1,500.00 779.50 48.0
1041-60 LEGAL & AUDIT FEES .00 9,060.97 38,500.00 29,439.03 23.5
10-41-63 ENGINEERING 1,950.00 6,887.00 14,500.00 7,613.00 47.5
1041-65 TRAINING/TRAVEL .00 1,733.84 4,500.00 2,766.16 38.5
10-41-70 INSURANCE LIABILITY .00 9,485.50 15,286.00 5,800.50 62.1
10-41-75 ELECTRICITY -NATURAL GAS 1,176.65 10,220.74 20,500.00 10,279.26 49.9
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 20,734.97 165,207.47 334,298.00 169,090.53 49.4
POLICE DEPARTMENT
1046-10 POLICE -PAYROLL 6,852.80 58,122.82 100,000.00 41,877.18 58.1
10-46-20 PAYROLL TAXES 617.52 5,273.82 15,000.00 9,726.18 35.2
1046-30 POLICE -RETIREMENT 899.04 7,088.38 15,000.00 7,911.62 47.3
10-4640 POLICE -HEALTH INSURANCE 1,451.80 13,200.10 30,000.00 16,799.90 44.0
1046-70 POLICE -TRAINING .00 2,889.59 10,000.00 7,110.41 28.9
10-46-80 POLICE-COUNTY/DISPATCH .00 25,702.95 39,000.00 13,297.05 65.9
1046-90 POLICE -GENERAL 893.99 16,070.56 21,300.00 5,229.44 75.5
TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT 10,715.15 128,348.22 230,300.00 101,951.78 55.7
MISCELLANEOUS DEPT
10-47-10 MAINTENANCE 1,987.62 43,269.42 94,000.00 50,730.58 46.0
10-47-20 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 2,785.97 18,923.69 26,000.00 7,076.31 72.8
1047-30 EQUIPMENT EXPENSE 1,014.90 4,738.91 5,000.00 261.09 94.8
10-47-50 CIVIL DEFENSE .00 895.00 1,000.00 105.00 89.5
10-47-60 MYAC EXPENSE 46.50 1,168.00 1,000.00 ( 168.00) 116.8
10-47-70 IONA DAY EXPENSE 500.00 1,379.81 5,000.00 3,620.19 27.6
1047-80 MUSEUM EXPENSE 120.00 607.21 1,000.00 392.79 60.7
10-47-90 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 1,597.24 5,041.31 10,000.00 4,958.69 50.4
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS DEPT
CAPITAL OUTLAY
8,052.23 76,023.35
143,000.00 66,976.65 53.2
10-48-10 LIBRARY .00 .00 3,000.00 3,000.00 .0
1048-20 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 6,671.52 11,782.26 102,300.00 90,517.74 11.5
10-48-50 LAND ACQUISITION .00 .00 10,000.00 10,000.00 .0
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
6,671.52 11,782.26
115, 300.00 103, 517.74 10.2
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY
67 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED O6/13/2016 12:29PM PAGE: 3
CITY OF IONA
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2016
GENERAL FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
RECREATION EXPENDITURES
10-49-10 RECREATION LABOR 1,374.25 29,153.89 31,680.00 2,526.11 92.0
10-49-20 PAYROLL TAXES 159.96 2,983.75 4,500.00 1,516.25 66.3
10-49-50 RECREATION SUPPLIES .00 8,247.33 21,000.00 12,752.67 39.3
10-49-60 RECREATION EQUIPMENT 43.64 1,552.01 10,500.00 8,947.99 14.8
10-49-70 RECREATION MAINTENANCE .00 1,360.00 3,000.00 1,640.00 45.3
TOTAL RECREATION EXPENDITURES 1,577.85 43,296.98 70,680.00 27,383.02 61.3
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
10-50-10 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
.00 23,062.50 45,000.00 21,937.50 51.3
TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .00 23,062.50 45,000.00 21,937.50 51.3
TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 47,751.72 447,720.78 938,578.00 490,857.22 47.7
NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES ( 28,796.72) 40,863.41 .00 ( 40,863.41) .0
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY
67 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 06/13/2016 12:29PM PAGE: 4
CITY OF IONA
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2016
WATER FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
OPERATING REVENUE
51-31-10 COLLECTIONS 23,822.89 168,336.67 251,161.00 82,824.33 67.0
51-31-30 HOOK UP FEES .00 57,000.00 81,000.00 24,000.00 70.4
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 23,822.69 225,336.67 332,161.00 106,824.33 67.8
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
51-33-80 GRANTS .00 .00 253,000.00 253,000.00 .0
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE .00 .00 253,000.00 253,000.00 .0
WATER
51-35-10 WATER SYSTEM .00 .00 280,000.00 280,000.00 .0
TOTAL WATER .00 .00 280,000.00 280,000.00 .0
MISCELANEOUS REVENUE
51-36-10 INTEREST 88.48 1,059.35 2,000.00 940.65 53.0
51-36-20 MISC REVENUE .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0
TOTAL MISCELANEOUS REVENUE 88.48 1,059.35 2,500.00 1,440.65 42.4
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
51-38-60 EQUIPMENT RESERVES .00 .00 40,000.00 40,000.00 .0
TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .00 .00 40,000.00 40,000.00 .0
RESERVES
51-39-50 RESERVES .00 .00 50,000.00 50,000.00 .0
TOTAL RESERVES .00 .00 50,000.00 50,000.00 .0
TOTAL FUND REVENUE
23,911.37 226,396.02
957,661.00 731,264.98 23.6
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY
67 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 06/22/2016 04:47PM PAGE: 5
CITY OF IONA
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2016
WATER FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
ADMINISTRATION
51-41-10 PAYROLL 5,746.73 59,776.73 94,710.00 34,933.27 63.1
51-41-20 PAYROLL TAXES 577.77 6,498.45 11,700.00 5,201.55 55.5
51-41-30 RETIREMENT 594.77 7,113.42 12,500.00 5,386.58 56.9
51-41-40 HEALTH INSURANCE 1,380.71 15,063.16 19,540.00 4,476.84 77.1
51-41-50 OFFICE EXPENSE & LEGAL 1,178.38 29,399.53 23,990.00 ( 5,409.53) 122.6
51-41-70 INSURANCE LIABILITY .00 5,768.50 .00 ( 5,768.50) .0
51-41-75 ELECTRICITY & NATURAL GAS 3,248.62 23,828.93 47,400.00 23,571.07 50.3
51-41-80 ENGINEERING 3,114.00 17,092.00 50,000.00 32,908.00 34.2
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
MISCELLANEOUS
15,840.98 164,540.72 259,840.00 95,299.28 63.3
51-47-10 MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS 336.63 14,929.42 46,021.00 31,091.58 32.4
5147-20 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 1,400.00 5,549.20 200.00 ( 5,349.20) 2774.6
51-47-30 EQUIPMENT EXPENSE .00 91.49 3,000.00 2,908.51 3.1
51-47-35 EQUIPMENT RENT .00 .00 4,000.00 4,000.00 .0
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 1,736.63 20,570.11 53,221.00 32,650.89 38.7
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
51-48-20 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
51-48-30 LAND ACQUISITION
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
51-50-10 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
17,654.27 25,972.91 570,000.00 544,027.09 4.6
00 38,500.00 35,000.00 ( 3,500.00) 110.0
17,654.27 64,472.91 605,000.00 540,527.09 10.7
.00 23,062.50 39,600.00 16,537.50 58.2
TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .00 23,062.50 39,600.00 16,537.50 58.2
TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 35,231.88 272,646.24 957,661.00 685,014.76 28.5
NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES ( 11,320.51) ( 46,250.22) .00 46,250.22 .0
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY
67 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 06/22/2016 04:47PM PAGE: 6
June 10, 2016
Mayor Brad Anderson
Council President Dan Gubler
Council Member Kathy McNamara
Council Member Dan Garren
Council Member Rob Geray
P.O. Box 487
Iona, Idaho 83427
Dear Mayor and City Council:
This letter is written input for the Public Hearing to be held on June 28 regarding the
proposed subdivision north of town. I will attempt to attend and testify, but I ask that
you enter this comment into the public record in case I am unable to.
This letter is written from the assumption that the subdivision will go in, and that the
only question before the City Council is whether to annex or not to annex.
I am opposed to annexation on three grounds:
1) Quality of Life. Quality of life would be reduced by construction and residential
traffic if the subdivision were connected to Iona city streets. This would affect Iona
residents north of Iona Road, and especially those of us on Olsen and Main Streets.
If we annex, I am sure we will have to connect the subdivision to City streets. If we
do not annex, the City can alter its road rights of way so that the only connection to
the subdivision would be crash barriers or plastic pylons for emergency -only access.
In that case, all the subdivision traffic would go out on Telford, and nearly all of it
from there to Beeches Corner. Iona would be largely unaffected.
2) Ongoing Cost vs. Revenue. In the past I have provided you with the quote from the
Iona City Plan, and additional documentation, that residential development typically
generates more costs than it does revenues. At the Planning and Zoning meeting I
made this comment and the Rockwell representative stated in his rebuttal that all
the infrastructure would be new and that there would be very little cost to the city.
That may be true in the short run, but the infrastructure will not stay new. From my
review of the City budget I think Rockwell's representation is optimistic at best and
unrealistic.
1
Exhibit "A"
3) Initial Costs. At the Planning and Zoning meeting, the Rockwell representative
indicated that the offer to pay in advance $330,000 of hookup fees was to finance a
new well to serve the subdivision. I believe that $330,000 is inadequate to
construct a municipal well, and wholly inadequate to both construct a well and
obtain water rights for it.
At the Planning and Zoning meeting it was also discussed that other infrastructure
improvements must be made within the existing City, to accommodate the
subdivision. These are related mostly to the increased traffic load that inevitably will
occur if the subdivision is connected to City streets.
I realize there are arguments to consider annexation, and strong momentum for doing
so. Before the City commits to a perpetual stream of tens of thousands of dollars of
cost each year, and to connecting this new subdivision to existing city streets, I ask that
you make a one-time expenditure of a few tens of thousands of dollars to do three
things:
1) Rigorously quantify the City costs that will go up if the subdivision is developed, but
not annexed or connected to City streets.
2) Rigorously quantify the long term cost and revenue changes that will occur if the
subdivision is developed and annexed.
3) Rigorously quantify all the up -front costs that the City will be subjected to if the
subdivision is annexed. These include but probably are not limited to:
a) Well and water rights;
b) Water main improvements up to the point(s) of connection to the new
subdivision;
c) Street improvements to Olsen and Main, including widening, curb and gutter,
and pavement sufficient to withstand three to five years of construction traffic;
d) Sidewalks and safe paths to school;
e) Lighting.
2
I ask that these evaluations be undertaken by qualified professionals. The engineering
firm that has been advising the City on water infrastructure is well qualified to do the
third task, but I do not believe their expertise extends to the first two.
When the studies are complete, I ask that if the decision is still to annex, the conditions
of annexation be such that the increased costs to the current residents are no more
than the costs that would be incurred if the subdivision were to proceed without
annexation and without connection to Iona City Streets.
Thank you,
Brycd'A. Contor
5223 Steele Avenue
P.O. Box 94
Iona, Idaho 83427
3
CITY OF IONA
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of
Iona will conduct a public hearing on June 8, 2016 at 6:30 pm at the Iona Community Center,
which is located at 3548 North Main Street, Iona, Idaho. The purpose of the hearing is to
consider an application for a preliminary plat for the Thomasville Estates Subdivision, a
Subdivision located on 41 st North (Rushton Road) between North 50th East (Crook Road) and
North 55th East.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a second public hearing will be conducted before
the Iona City Council at 7:15 p.m. on June 28, 2016 at the said Community Center, also for the
purpose of considering said preliminary plat, the Thomasville Estates Subdivision is more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING AT A POINT THAT IS N88°03'29"E 338.32 FEET ALONG THE EAST -WEST
CENTER SECTION LINE FROM THE CENTER CORNER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 38 EAST, BOISE-MERIDIAN, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO; AND
RUNNING THENCE N00°48'42"W 301.04 FEET; THENCE S87°50'51 "W 332.22 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF RUSHTON ADDITION DIVISION No. 1,
CITY OF IONA, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO; POINT ALSO BEING A POINT ON
THE NORTH -SOUTH CENTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE ALONG
SAID BOUNDARY LINE N00°21136"E 2386.53 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST -WEST
NORTH SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE ALONG SAID SECTION LINE
N89°17'01"E 1402.75 FEET; THENCE S00°21136"W 2656.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
EAST -WEST CENTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE ALONG SAID
SECTION LINE S88°03'29"W 1065.31 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 83.703 ACRES.
The public is invited to attend and public comment is encouraged. Written comments
will be accepted and considered, provided they are delivered no later than three full business
days prior to the hearing. Such comments must be physically delivered to the Office of the City
Clerk at 3548 North Main Street, Iona, Idaho. Comments may also be emailed to the following
email address: cityclerk@cityofiona.org.
Any person needing special accommodations to participate in such meetings should
contact the City Clerk's Office no later than the day prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's
telephone number is 523-5600.
DATED this 23`d day May, 2016 Shara Roberts, City Clerk
Mailed: May 24, 2016
Posted: June 1, 2016
Published: May 24, 2016
Exhibit "B"
CITY OF IONA
3548 North Main
P.O. Box 487
Iona Idaho 83427
Application for Preliminary Plat
Phone: (208) 523-5600
Fax: (208) 535-0087
Applicant Information
Representing Company: Eagle Rock Engineering
Contact Name: Kurt Roland
Phone: 208-542-2665
Address: 1331 Fremont Ave.
Fax: 208-511-2664
Cit : Idaho Falls State: Idaho
th‘ner Information (Ifothcr than Applicant)
Name: Rockwell Homes
Z..: 83402
Phone: 208-881-0733
Address: 3539 Briar Creek Lane Ste. E
Cit : Ammon
Propert‘ OIC'onsidcration
Legal Description: See attached document,
State: Idaho
also on preliminary plat
Zi.: 83406
Current Zone: AG
Proposed Zone: R-I
Comprehensive Land Ivlap Use: Residential 1
Total Area (Acres): 83.703
Project Name: THONIASVILLE
ESTATES
LAistinz Property Use
AGRICULTURE
PrnpnScd Property t!se
Residential
�12[1.1lUre (,f NrnilLant(S)
a,I�. i�
,4.
Type of Development
Number of Lots
Proposed Zoning
Net Density
(Residential)
Single Family
110
Residential 1
1.31 UNITS/ACRE
Multi Family
Common Areas
Office/Medical
Commercial
Industrial
*Other
*Describe if "Other":
Trip (veneration
Based upon the Trip Generation Manual. by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, calculate the anticipated
PNI peak hour trips generated by the proposed plat. (If the anticipated trips exceed 100 PM peak hour trips a
traffic study may be required, if the anticipated trips exceed 200 PM peak hour trips a traffic study is
re. uired.)
Neighborhood Meetiniz
Will a neighborhood meeting be held prior to the Planning
Preliminary Plat Checklist
Completed Application Form
Commission Meeting? If
Applicant
yes, where and when:
Staff
Affidavit of Legal Interest
Current Vicinity Map
One (1) 8 % .. xl 1" Reduction of Preliminary Plat
Copy of Plat
Traffic Study (if required)
Digital File of Plat in .dxf or .dwa format
Information Required on Preliminary Plat
• Proposed Name of Subdivision
• Legal Description
• Name. Address. and Phone Number of Developer
• Name. Address, and Phone Number of Engineering Firm
• North Point, Scale (1 "= 100") and Date
• Vicinity Map Showing Surrounding Area Within One -Half ( % ) Mile
• Boundary Line of Tract to be Subdivided to Scale
• Existing and Proposed Land Use
• Zoning of Proposed Subdivision and Adjacent Land
• Contour Lines. if Required by the City Engineer
• Sites Proposed for Public (Parks. Schools. Recreation. etc.)
" S i t e s P r o p o s e d f o r C o m m o n A r e a s
" A l l P r o p o s e d o r E x i s t i n g U t i l i t i e s
" P r o p o s e d S t r e e t s a n d A l l e y s , i n c l u d i n g W i d t h s a n d S t r e e t N a m e s
" T y p i c a l s t r e e t S e c t i o n
" F e a t u r e s S u c h a s R a i l r o a d L i n e s . C a n a l s . D i t c h e s . S t r u c t u r e s e t c .
" E x i s t i n g a n d P r o p o s e d E a s e m e n t s
" L o t L i n e s a n d B l o c k s S h o w i n g T y p i c a l D i m e n s i o n s
T h i s a p p l i c a t i o n w i l l b e r e f e r r e d t o t h e I o n a P l a n n i n g a n d Z o n i n g C o m m i s s i o n f o r a r e c o m m e n d a t i o n o n t h e r e q u e s t e d z o n i n g .
T h e P l a n n i n g a n d Z o n i n g C o m m i s s i o n s h a l l h o l d a p u b l i c h e a r i n g a n d w i l l t h e n m a k e i t s r e c o m m e n d a t i o n t o t h e C i t y C o u n c i l .
T h e C i t y C o u n c i l w i l l t h e n h o l d a s e c o n d p u b l i c h e a r i n g . N o t i c e o f t h e p u b l i c h e a r i n g s m u s t b e p u b l i s h e d 1 5 d a y s p r i o r t o s a i d
h e a r i n g s . N o t i c e s h a l l a l s o b e p o s t e d o n t h e p r e m i s e s o f t h e s u b j e c t p r o p e r t y n o t l e s s t h a n 1 w e e k p r i o r t o t h e h e a r i n g s . N o t i c e s
w i l l a l s o b e m a i l e d t o p r o p e r t y o w n e r s o r p u r c h a s e r s o f r e c o r d w i t h i n 3 0 0 f e e t o f t h e s u b j e c t p r o p e r t y . Y o u w i l l b e g i v e n n o t i c e o f
t h e p u b l i c h e a r i n g s a n d m u s t b e p r e s e n t t o a n s w e r a n y q u e s t i o n s .
A P P L I C A T I O N A C C E P T E D B Y :
D A T E : t J
l l
A P P L I C A T I O N F E E R E C E I V E D Q V
D A T E : S
r C e
1 1 2 . 0 1 U
P & Z M E E T I N G : �� _
C O U N C I L M E T G : 0
Z i t Z i l a
P E R M I T A P P R O V E D : ( ) P E R M I T D E N I E D : ( )
C O N D I T I O N S I M P O S E D :
A D D I T I O N A L S H E E T S M A Y B E U S E D A S N E E D E D
C I T Y O F I O N A P L A N N I N G & Z O N I N G
VAGLE ROCK
NGINEERING
CIVIL o PLANNING o SURVEYING
1331 FRE44Ot4T AVE • IDAHO FALLS,10 83402
IDA10 FALLS (Z8) 542.2685 • R803UR0 (208) 359.2865 • FAX (2(0) 522.2884
VICINITY MAP
SSchiess & Associates
IMPROVING COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE
7103 SOUTH 48TH WEST, IDAHO FALLS, ID 83402
OPTICS: (208) 822-1244 FAX: (208) 822-8232
June 3, 2016
Shara Roberts, City Clerk
City of Iona
PO Box 487
Iona, ID 83427
Re: Review of the Proposed Preliminary Plat of Thomasville Estates
Dear Shara:
Per City request, we have reviewed the proposed preliminary plat application and annexation/zoning
application. Documents reviewed include two drawings constituting the preliminary plat and the
aforementioned applications. We reviewed the proposed preliminary plat against the following documents
listed below and discussed the development with the Bonneville Metropolitan Planning Organization
(BMPO) and the City attorney in developing the findings and recommendations.
Iona Code §8-2 (Water Service Ordinance)
Iona Code §10-1 (Subdivision Ordinance)
Iona Code § 11-4 (Single Family Residential (R-1))
Bonneville County Comprehensive Plan
Iona -Bonneville County Impact Agreement
BMPO Asset Management Plan Update
IDAPA 58.01.08 Idaho Rules for Public Drinking Water Systems
This property is located in Bonneville County and lies entirely within the City of Iona Impact Area. The
subject property is listed as Urban Residential on the Bonneville County Comprehensive Plan land use
map. The southern end of the property abuts the north end of original Iona town site, which is zoned R-1.
The developer desired Iona zoning for this development is R-1 with minimum half acre lots.
Our findings and conclusions are given below:
1. The application for annexation requests city water and sewer. The sewer provider will be Iona -
Bonneville Sewer District (IBSD). The Developer should seek approval of the sewer line
extensions and sizing of the proposed sewer mainlines from IBSD. The City is desirous to know at
this juncture whether a lift station will be required and where it would be placed. The City should
condition any approval of the preliminary plat subject to IBSD acceptance of the sewer collection
system design plan. If a lift station is required, it will also need a generator to operate it when grid
power is lost.
2. It is unclear whether the cul-de-sac lots defined by curve number in the curve tables including
C15, C16, C21-C22, C27&C28 combined, C32, C33, C38, C39, C49 and C62 have required street
frontage. The developer should verify the lot frontage on these lots by following the instructions
of § 10-1-7(B) of the Subdivision Ordinance, which allow for measurement along the front setback
line.
Shara Roberts
June 3, 2016
Page 2
3. It appears that the corner lots in Block 4 are too small relative to the balance of the remaining lots
in this block per Iona Code § 10-1-7(G). With minor adjustments to the lot sizes in Block 4, it
appears that corner lots can all be made larger as required.
4. If the City approves the preliminary plat, the developer should use the attached City Acceptance
statement and Owner's Dedication statement on each set of final plat documents prepared for each
division.
5. A review of the BMPO Access Management Plan indicates that the need for a traffic study is
border line. This development should increase new peak -hour vehicle trips to 100, more or less.
Item 2 in Subsection 6.3.1 states that a study may be warranted at new peak hour trips of 100. The
annexation itself can also justify a study (See Item 3). A brief review of current traffic count data
on nearby collector streets to be affected by this development indicate that all streets affected by
the development will be nowhere near capacity after the subdivision is built out. As general
guidance to the City, new peak hour trips on affected local roads connecting the development to
the City will be minimized if all existing streets that were planned for future connection to the new
development are connected. Any other action may turn an existing local street into a collector for
the development. The intersection of Olson Ave. and Rushton Rd. must be reconfigured to a "Tee"
intersection, which may affect safety due to the change in traffic controls that will inevitably occur
there.
If the City chooses not to require a traffic study, BMPO would give the City guidance on how to
reconfigure the Olson Ave. and Rushton Rd. intersection perhaps by reviewing the developer's
improvement drawings of the intersection. Other questions of safety the City may have could also
be addressed by BMPO.
If the City requires the developer prepare a traffic study, then a Category I study is all that should
be required. The study should be conducted by a qualified person (A PTOE is preferred per
Subsection 6.3.3.). The study procedure would best be accomplished by following the guidance
given in Section 6.3 of the Access Management Plan. BMPO will review the traffic study on
behalf of the City of Iona once it is complete. The reconfiguration plan of the intersection of Olson
Ave. and Rushton Rd. could be made part of the study.
6. As part of the annexation agreement, the City should require the developer to make the
connections from existing City streets to the development including the reconfiguration of the
intersection of Olson Ave. and Rushton Rd.
7. The attached Irrigation Entity Checklist and Irrigation Entity Disclosure statement is provided for
City and Developer use to aid in determining the nature of the irrigation system that will be
allowed. By inspection of the subject property, it is apparent that it lies within the boundary of
Progressive Irrigation District. Therefore the second checkbox must be checked. The City and
Developer must then agree on whether the Developer will provide a separate underground
irrigation delivery system to each home (the third check box) or include the Irrigation Entity
Disclosure statement on the final plat (the fourth check box) for each division. The fourth check
box and attached Irrigation Entity Disclosure statement will inform potential property owners that
their property will remain in the Progressive Irrigation District, an irrigation delivery system will
Shara Roberts
June 3, 2016
Page 3
not be provided by the Developer or the City and lot owners will have to pay an irrigation
assessment even though they will derive no benefit from the water.
8. To ensure the provision of drinking water to future annexations north of this development, the
annexation agreement should require the developer to continue the existing 12 inch diameter trunk
line on Olson Avenue north through the subdivision all the way to Telford Road, thence both
directions to the edges of the development on the east and west ends of the property along Telford
Road. For the Telford Road extensions, the City could include as part of the annexation agreement
to allow repayment to the Developer by use of a front foot fee payment for anyone on the north
side of Telford Road that derives benefit from the Telford Road waterline segment. The
annexation agreement may also require the developer to upsize the waterline through the
subdivision to a 12 inch diameter line, with provisions for the City to reimburse the developer for
the material costs associated with the up -sized line.
9. The City should require the developer to extend the existing six inch waterline in Main St. from
the south end of the development north to the intersection of the proposed Jaynes Dr. and Main St.
to form a loop and thereby eliminate the existing dead end line.
10. With the City anticipating the need to add a new culinary well to the City water system, this
development would be a good place to position the well. The logical place for such a new well
would be at the extreme north east corner of the subdivision. As a starting point for discussion,
perhaps the two cul-de-sac Lots 15 and 16 could be reconfigured to allow for a third lot for a Well
lot adjacent to Telford Road. The well lot could be a flag lot at the end of the cul-de-sac. The street
serving the flag lot access could be the location of the 12 inch diameter main pipe. This pipe could
be laid under the flag lot access on to the well lot and on to Telford Road. This would mesh well
with the City plan to extend the 12 inch diameter pipe from the east end of the subdivision on
Telford Road to the intersection of Telford Road and 55th East to create a pipe loop and eliminate
the dead end on the existing six inch diameter line on 55th East. A minimum 100 feet square lot is
required for a well lot per the Idaho Rules for Public Drinking Water Systems.
This concludes our findings and recommendations at this point. If the City proceeds with annexation, we
suggest the City allow us to review the annexation agreement, each division of the final plat and
associated improvement drawings.
Please contact me if the City has any further questions.
Sincerely,
Paul H. Scoresby, PE
Attachments: Irrigation Entity Checklist & Irrigation Entity Disclosure Statement
City Acceptance Statement
Owner's Dedication Statement
'0N
IRRIGATION ENTITY CHECKLIST
Idaho Code § 31-3805 prohibits the approval of any subdivision plat of property
located within the boundaries of an existing irrigation entity without compliance with
certain conditions. The purpose of this Checklist is to ensure such compliance.
PLEASE CHECK ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CHECK BOXES BEFORE COUNCIL
APPROVAL OR RECORDING:
❑ No portion of the subdivision is located within the boundaries of an irrigation
entity.' If this check box is checked, no further compliance with Idaho Code §
31-3805 is required.
❑ All or a portion of the subdivision is located within the boundaries of an
irrigation entity. If this check box is checked, then one of the following check
boxes must also be checked before plat approval:
❑ Owner has provided or agreed in writing to provide an underground
water delivery system compliant with Idaho Code § 31-3805, the City
Engineer has reviewed and approved plans therefore, and the plat
contains a certification to be signed by the irrigation district and the City
consistent with I. C. § 31-3805(1)(b)(i), or
❑ The plat contains the attached Irrigation Entity Disclosure and the
owner/developer has signed such disclosure
G:\WPDATA\DWS\2708 City of lonatFonns\Planaing & Zoningllnigation Entity Chxklist.wpd:sm
1For the purposes hereof an "Irrigation Entity" is any irrigation district, canal company, ditch association or other similar water
delivery entity.
IRRIGATION ENTITY DISCLOSURE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ALL LOTS OR PROPERTY INCLUDED WITHIN
THIS PLAT ARE WITHIN THE (INSERT NAME OF DISTRICT) DISTRICT AND THAT A
SUITABLE SURFACE WATER DELIVERY SYSTEM HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR
SUCH LOTS. ALL LOTS WILL REMAIN SUBJECT TO CURRENT AND FUTURE
ASSESSMENTS LEVIED BY SUCH IRRIGATION DISTRICT AND EACH INDIVIDUAL
PURCHASER/OWNER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PAY SUCH ASSESSMENTS AS
THEY FALL DUE. PRIOR TO THE SALE OF ANY LOT WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION,
THE UNDERSIGNED OWNER SHALL PROVIDE THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER A
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AS REQUIRED BY I.C. § 31-3805(2).
City Acceptance Statement
City's Acceptance
The foregoing plat was duly accepted and approved by the City of Iona, Idaho by resolution
adopted this day of , 20
Acceptance - Mayor Attest - Clerk
OWNER'S DEDICATION
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that we the undersigned are the
lawful owners of the tract of land included in the boundary description shown hereon and
have caused the same to be platted and divided into blocks, lots, streets and easements to
be hereafter known as (full name of subdivision) .
BE IT FURTHER KNOWN that we do hereby dedicate to the Public all streets,
alleys and rights -of -way shown hereon, that we also grant and convey to the Public all
public utility easements shown hereon and that we hereby warrant and shall defend the
estate subject to such dedication and conveyances in the quiet and peaceful possession of
the Public against said owners and their heirs and assigns, and against every person
whomsoever who lawfully holds or who later claims to have lawfully held any rights in
said estate as of the date hereof.
, 20
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this day of
Owner(s)
APPLICATION FOR NNEXATION/Z NING
CITY OF IONA
This application must be fin ut in detail and�aubmitted to the City Clerk's office at 3548 North Main Street, Iona, Idaho
1. Name of applicant: en
� n
2. Address of applicant: 4 6,1 95 .j2e
n
` work; age —221 S (ia me. Jae g- sZ 3 od Z Z
4. Address of subject property: yq N fyr`" S S R I (f'
5. Legal description of property, (attach if necessary): attAft-a. _
3. Telephone number of applicant:
6. Is the applicant the owner of the subject property? If not, please state the name and address of the owner, together with the relationship
of applicant to the owner. (7;0—LkII I
7. Is a copy of one of the following attached?_ warranty deed; _ proof of option; _ eamest money agreement.
8. State the zoning desired for the subject property: • D._ a. ri..A1/o .rt�.C/b-r _
9. State the reason for the proposed annexation and any proposed plans for th use of the subject property:
ati
-11A�-J►-e-4 QaQ�c�� _ _ +' Al e 0
9—
Dated this day of 20 _ Signature of applicant
i ll
This application will be referred to the Iona Planning and Zoning Commission for a recommendation on the requested zoning.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a public hearing and will then make its recommendation to the City Council.
The City Council will then hold a second public hearing. Notice of the public hearings must be published 15 days prior to said
hearings. Notice shall also be posted on the premises of the subject property not less than 1 week prior to the hearings. Notices
will also be mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within 300 feet of the subject property. You will be given notice of
the public hearings and must be present to answer any questions.
APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: 4441n4,/,A�,,
DATE: _ �7//�
APPLICATION FEE RECEIVED: $ n. dO
DATE: ` $ f I (p
NOTICE PUBLISHED: Date: /
SITE POSTED: Date: N// A'
NOTICE TO RESIDENTS: Date:
DATE OF - .
Q MottMott��(/m 7 , �jRP
PERMIT APPROVED: ( ) PERMIT DENIED: ( )
NOTICE OF DECISION MAILED ON:
CONDITIONS IMPOSED:
ADDITIONAL SHEETS MAY BE USED AS NEEDED
RESIDENTS NOTIFIED:
CITY OF IONA PLANNING & ZONING
-Per Cat& phmtec�, no Rz is n.Pida or pail&
Exhibit "C"
'''sue 49 milevars' sw 14/41
Y
-io&NM0o 1,00Z S79V4 OHIOt .J0 A11.1 J ildta8 30 =VS
ISO
tn
d�- 4 A► �
rtn*
,Oi = „G 37VOS
,19'691 3.4 AL
UN NUN .4/ v a Iw
,3SWO* 35
.t
TONING° iOOZ ST IVJ O10101 CIO A110 a 91V11028 JO SSW
y .0r _ „l :37VOS tit
.,.�y PAPIPIPCns Jary6L3
;:pd al./. ay- terdshp rare/444i j:PfA Str+1-5 -of XWA j.o +4114N
r� / a7
2040 BMPA Master
Roadway plan
Freeway
Principal Arterial
Proposed Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Proposed Minor Arterial
Urban Collector
Proposed Urban Collector
Residential Collector
Local Street
11. OM
Rural Major Collector (p)
Proposed Rural Major Collector (p)
Rural Major Collector (m)
Proposed Rural Major Collector (m)
Rural Minor Collector
BMPQ Access Menagenent plan
_Judy 2012
The typical right-of-way widths shown in Table 3 also provide a benchmark for long-range
planning purposes. If planning studies a ge
way are needed beyond these assumptions then that indicates reviicle lanes siting the c� overall street
network and land use plans and policies (i.e. symptom of a mismatch). For example, if a
collector street needs to be widened to five lanes, then that could indicate (A) the collector
street shouki be an arterial, (6) too much development was allowed in the vicinity, and/or (C)
poor overall vehicle connectivity in the transportation network.
If planning studies suggest less lanes are needed, than cost-effective interim urban
improvements should be used rather than building and maintaining unneeded pavement This
preserves right-of-way for future needs while creating a livable and financially sustainable
situation in the present environment.
See Section 6.1 for discussion on street cross-section characteristics. Specific cross -
sectional element designs would differ based on travel context classification.
Table 3. Typical Right -of -Way Widths
ClaseMcationi
FreaVye Roadway Segments Number Of V sa
Accgam
Expressways 200 feet' 2 or 3 lanes per direction
180 feet'
Strategic Arterials2 or 8 lanes per direction
120 fest 2 or 3 lanes per direction
Principal Arterials 100 feet
Minor Arterials 5 lanes
100 lest
Major Colectom 80 feat S /ernes
Residential Collectors 3 lanes
Local Streets 70 feet 2 to 3 lanes
Varies
Intersections with Arterial' Add 20 feet to width above°
2 lanes
1 additional left -turn laces and
1. Right-of-way based on vehicular functional1 additional right-tum lane
context classifications.del sNmu,t design. woWd on travel
2. Additional right-of-way needed at itterssdlons with strategic arterial, principal arterials, and nurwr wtedal for tum lanes eto.
3. Could aecomrnedwe ue to three bona In each direction. Based on I70 Guidelines and review of fadWies in region.
4. WO 80 feet vials If center turn bay *anticipated on residential boa.
5.be based Consult the
on flee agency
s area aeresollon �-of`wsy needs yaw by location. The linear length of the additional
right-of-way would
type of hNerodenge plastid for the are(tea section 4.9.1). ftighbdi way heads orwarti intarchanariaend on ure
BMPO Access Management Plan
Rogoot rec.-624N,
f3
July 2012
for centerline -to -centerline measurements. The downstream spacing is based on stopping
sight distance after clearing half the intersection.
The spacing of an intersections near a major intersection should be streater than the minim rm
paging a arlossrl i.. da
(Source: Access ManagemeM Manuel, TRB. 2003)
Figure 5. Functional Area of Major Intersections
Table S. Intersection Spacing Based on the Functional Area of Major Intersections
Posted speed P.R. Distance Inca uver Queued Vg,h' Distance to Minimum Minimum
(P1PM (Mt (M2 Length contorting, Upstream Dower
A (M (104 spacing (ire' Spacing (Ms
B C
25
30
40
48
66
55
70
515
sou Distance ;Access Management
Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2003)
1. Desirable Maneuver �e Drivers Percepuon-Reacdon. See A� Management Manual Table 8-3.
3. Minimum bran fw inaq� deceleration and lane change. See Access Management meal Table 10-2.
lower operating speed, (La shor r regrdvehicles � truck Under completed Conditions, queues rtury be longer hut ScNY offset with
4. Distance from Cross -street collegiate to front of queue.
5. Minimum upstream m driveway
spacing, oe �� fie. See Access Management Merwm Chapter 9.
e• Minimum downstream
cerkerWre. Based on clopping sight distance air clearing �� the
50
D
50
A+B+C+D
226
280
155
200
125
i rranspoGRouP
50
70 760
22
NOTICE OF AWARD
Date of Issuance:
Owner:
Engineer:
Project:
Bidder:
(Bidder's Address:
TO BIDDER:
You are notified that Owner has accepted your Bid dated May 26-2016 for the above Contract, and that
you are the Successful Bidder and are awarded a Contract for:
Iona Water Storage Tank Improvements, consisting of concrete surface rehabilitation for the existing tank,
modifications to the existing hatch, and installation of an exterior ladder, an interior ladder, an electric tank mixer
and a pump -to -waste system.
Owner's Contract No.:
Engineer's Project No.:
Contract Name:
215114-000
Iona Water Storage Tank
Improvements
City of lona, Idaho
Keller Associates, Inc.
Iona Water Storage Tank
Improvements
Steel Design, LLC
P.O. Box 50308, Idaho Falls, ID 83405
a
The Contract Price of the awarded Contract is: $154,203.00 (subject to unit price quantity adjustments) L.“5 AOD
A- 1-119-11,41ES,Z, Folt1140.ao at3 -►v.4' e_ $3F25'•�r> raRA raLCow .-- 401a/ee7e1 )
Three unexecuted counterparts' the Agreement ac ompany this Notice of Award; -and one copy of -the
Contract Documents including drawings accompany this Notice of Award,fo-r has been transmitted or
made available to Bidder electronically. `'`' / 1/j e/4
a set of the Drawings will be delivered separately from the other Contract Documents.
You must comply with the following conditions precedent within 15 days of the date of receipt of this Notice
of Award:
1. Deliver to Owner three counterparts of the Agreement, fully executed by Bidder.
2. Deliver with the executed Agreements the Contract security [e.g., performance and payment bonds]
and insurance documentation as specified in the Instructions to Bidders and General Conditions,
Articles 2 and 6.
3. Other conditions precedent (if any):
Failure to comply with these conditions within the time specified will entitle Owner to consider you in default,
annul this Notice of Award, and declare your Bid security forfeited.
Within ten days after you comply with the above conditions, Owner will return to you one fully executed
counterpart of the Agreement, together with any additional copies of the Contract Documents as indicated in
Paragraph 2.02 of the General Conditions.
Owner: City of Iona, Idaho
By:
Title:
Authorized Signature
Brad Andersen
Mayor
Copy: Engineer
1,14J
EJCDC C-510, Notice of Award.
Prepared and published 2013 by the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee.
Page 1 of 2
Exhibit "D"
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IONA, IDAHO;
REPEALING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 8-2-27 OF THE
IONA CITY CODE RELATING TO INSTALLATION OF
WATER METERS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
PRESERVING PRIOR ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IONA,
IDAHO THAT:
Section 1. Repeal and Re -Enactment of Section 8-2-27 of the lona City Code:
Section 8-2-27 of the Iona City Code is repealed and re-enacted as follows:
8-2-27: AUTHORITY TO PLACE METERS:
(A) Upon a finding by the City Council that any customer is consuming unusually large
quantities of water or is habitually wasting culinary water supplied by the City, the
City Council may, at its sole discretion, install a water meter at the customer's point
of delivery and change the customer's method of billing from a flat monthly rate to
a metered rate. Such finding shall not be made unless written notice of the
Council's intent to consider and make such finding is first delivered to the customer
not less than ten (10) business days prior to the date such finding is to be
considered. Such notice shall state the date, time and place of the meeting at
which such finding will be considered and shall be deemed delivered upon deposit
thereof in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested,
addressed to the customer's last known mailing address according to the billing
records of the water utility. Such metered rate shall be established generally for all
customers similarly situated and shall be adopted by resolution or ordinance of the
City.
(B) Upon written request delivered to the City Clerk not less than three (3) business
days prior to the meeting date stated in such notice, the customer upon whose
water service it is proposed to install a water meter, shall be afforded a reasonable
opportunity to address the Council and to show cause why a water meter should not
be installed at the customer's point of delivery.
(C) Prior to the installation of residential water meters which in the aggregate exceed
twenty five percent (25%) of the total number of water service delivery points for
residential services located within the City, the City Council shall conduct a public
hearing to consider the merits and cost of installing water meters upon water service
lines serving such residential customers. Prior to the date of such public hearing,
the City Clerk shall cause to be published in the Official Newspaper at least two
Exhibit "E"
notices of hearing announcing the date, time and place of such public hearing.
Such notices shall be published on two separate occasions with the first such
publication being made no more than twenty-one calendar days prior to the date of
such public hearing and the last publication being made not less than seven (7)
days prior to the hearing date. At such hearing, such residential customers shall be
afforded an opportunity to provide testimony and evidence regarding the
advantages or disadvantages of installing water meters generally upon such
residential services.
(D) Subject to the provisions of subsections (H) and (I) below, the City shall not install
residential water meters which in the aggregate exceed twenty-five percent (25%)
of the total number of residential water service delivery points located within the City
unless an advisory referendum election calling for a repeal of this subsection is
submitted to the voters and such advisory referendum receives an affirmative vote
of at least sixty-six and two-thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the qualified electors voting
at an election called for such purpose. Such referendum election may be held on
the earliest of the four (4) dates authorized in subsections (1) and (7) of Idaho Code
§ 34-106, provided that the date of such election falls more than forty-five (45) days
after the date the City Council orders that such election be held.
(E) Upon receipt of a petition signed by at least twenty-five (25) qualified electors of the
City demanding that the City cease installation of residential water meters the City
Clerk shall forthwith examine the City Water Utility customer records in order to
determine whether or not the number of residential water meters installed exceeds
the percentage set forth in subsection (D) of this section. In the event the City Clerk
finds that such percentage has been exceeded, the City Clerk shall forthwith notify
the Mayor and City Council in writing that such percentage has been exceeded.
(F) Upon receipt of such notification from the City Clerk, the Mayor shall forthwith issue
an order forbidding the installation of any water meter upon any additional
residential service lines within the City, unless and until an advisory referendum
election has been conducted in accordance with subsection (D) of this Chapter and
an affirmative vote of at least sixty-six and two-thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the
qualified electors of the City voting at such election have voted in favor of such
referendum. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall obligate or require
the City Council to order that such advisory referendum election be conducted.
(G) If the City Clerk shall refuse to accept such petition or refuse to examine the public
utility records or give such notification or if the Mayor shall refuse to issue such
order, any qualified elector of the City may, within ten (10) days after such refusal
file a petition with the District Court seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the
Mayor or City Clerk to do or perform such acts. If it is decided by the Court that
such petition is legally sufficient, then the District Court may issue an order enjoining
the City and all other officers of the City from installing any additional residential
water meter until such advisory referendum election is conducted and until such
affirmative vote is received. Such advisory referendum election shall be conducted
in the manner set forth in Chapter 12, Title 1 of the Iona City Code.
(H) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (B) through (G) of this section, the
City may install residential water meters exceeding such percentage if prior thereto,
it has conducted a bond election seeking authority to issue a general obligation
bond or revenue bond for the purpose of purchasing and installing residential water
meters within the City and at such election the number of votes required by law to
secure passage of such bond, has been cast. Nothing herein shall be construed
to require a referendum election to authorize installation of water meters exceeding
such percentage if the installation of such water meters is specifically required as
a condition for the issuance of a loan to the City by the Idaho State Department of
Health and Welfare or the Department of Water Resources or any other state
agency for the purpose of installing, upgrading or repairing any portion of the water
system of the City, including the installation of water meters, or if either of such
agencies have issued an order to the City directing the installation of water meters
upon all residential customer services within the City.
Nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit, restrain or abrogate the authority of
the City to repeal, alter or amend this Section in part or in its entirety, in the manner
provided by law.
(I)
Section 2. Severability. The sections and subsections of this Ordinance are
severable. The invalidity of any section or subsection shall not affect the validity of the
remaining sections or subsections.
Section 3. Preservation of Prior Ordinance. The sections of the City Code
repealed or amended by this Ordinance shall be preserved to the extent necessary to allow
the arrest, prosecution and punishment of any person who violates such provisions prior
to the effective date hereof.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon its
passage, execution and publication in the manner provided by law.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL AND APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of
, 2016.
Brad Andersen
Mayor
ATTEST:
Shara Roberts
City Clerk
(SEAL)
STATE OF IDAHO )
)ss.
County of Bonneville )
I, SHARA ROBERTS, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF IONA, IDAHO, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY:
That the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Ordinance
entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IONA, IDAHO; REPEALING AND RE-
ENACTING SECTION 8-2-27 OF THE IONA CITY CODE RELATING TO INSTALLATION
OF WATER METERS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PRESERVING PRIOR
ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE."
Shara Roberts
City Clerk
G:\WPDATA\DWS\2708 City of lone\ORD\2016\Water Meta Ordinances\Water Meta Hearing.ORD.v5.wpd:sm
QUITCLAIM DEED
THIS INDENTURE, made this day of , 2016, between the City
of Iona, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTOR," and Shane Williams and
Julia L. Buckwalter, whose mailing address is 5411 Free Ave., Iona, Idaho, 83427, hereinafter
referred to as "GRANTEES,"
WITNESSETH:
That the Grantors, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/ 100 Dollars ($10.00)
lawful money of the United States of America and other good and valuable consideration to Grantors
in hand paid by the Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, do by these presents
remise, release and forever quitclaim unto the Grantee, and to Grantee's successors and assigns
forever, all right, title and interest now owned or hereafter acquired by the Grantors in all the
following described real estate in the County of Bonneville, State of Idaho, to -wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
TOGETHER with the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or
in anywise appertaining, and any reversions, any remainders, and rents, issues and profits therefrom.
RESERVING unto Grantor an easement for the operation, maintenance and replacement of
existing water, sewer, gas or other public utility lines.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises and the appurtenances unto the Grantee, and
to Grantee's successors and assigns forever.
In construing this Quitclaim Deed and where the context so requires, the singular includes
the plural.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantors have executed the within instrument on the date set
forth below.
Al LEST:
Shara Roberts
City Clerk
(SEAL)
CITY OF IONA
By:
Brad Andersen
Mayor
Exhibit "F"
STATE OF IDAHO
)ss.
County of Bonneville
On this day of , 2016, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for
Idaho, personally appeared BRAD ANDERSEN, known to me to be the Mayor of the City of Iona,
the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing document, and acknowledged to me that such
City executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and year first above written.
(SEAL)
Notary Public for Idaho
Residing at:
My Commission Expires:
2 — QUITCLAIM DEED
EXHIBIT A
Part of Dayton Street right-of-way in the Denning Addition to the Village of Iona per the
recorded plat filed in the Bonneville County courthouse, Instrument No. 3189911 and also
part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE 1/4 NE 1/4) of Section 12,
Township 2 North, Range 38 East of the Boise Meridian, Bonneville County Idaho
described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot 6, Block 8, Denning Addition to the Village of
Iona per the recorded plat filed in the Bonneville County courthouse, Instrument No.
3189911; thence 5.85°52'20"W. 29.45 feet along the north right-of-way line of Free
Avenue extended to the Southeast comer of the parcel as described in Exhibit "H",
Ordinance 104, Instrument No. 1249320;,thence N.00°14'20"W. 151.95 feet along the east
line of said parcel to the south line of Ashwood Acres, Division No. 1, an addition to the
City of Iona, Bonneville County, Idaho, Instrument No. 1003199; thence N.86°03'37"E.
29.44 feet along said south line to the easterly right-of-way line of Dayton Street and the
west line of Lot 6, Block 8, Denning Addition to the Village of Iona; thence S.00°14'20"E.
151.85 feet to the point of beginning.
Parcel contains 4,463 square feet.
GAWPDATAIDWS12708 City of bmlBtreet VeatiottADaytoe.QCD,3.wpd:sto
3 — QUITCLAIM DEED
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 104,
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF IONA, IDAHO;
REPEALING SECTION 9 OF SUCH ORDINANCE;
VACATING A PORTION OF DAYTON STREET IN THE
CITY OF IONA, IDAHO; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND
DELIVER ON BEHALF OF THE CITY A QUITCLAIM
DEED VACATING A PORTION OF DAYTON STREET IN
THE CITY OF IONA CONVEYING THE VACATED
STREET TO THE OWNER OF THE ADJACENT LAND,
AND NAMING THEM; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE
DATE OF ORDINANCE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF IONA, IDAHO THAT:
Section 1. Inasmuch as Section 9 of Ordinance No. 104, Ordinances of the City of
Iona erroneously vacated a portion of Dayton Street and conveyed the same to Kevin James
and Renee Oswald, the City does hereby repeal Section 9 of said Ordinance and declare the
Quitclaim Deed issued pursuant thereto null and void, nunc pro tunc.
Section 2. Vacation or Easement. A portion Dayton Street, a public street
located in the City of Iona, Bonneville County, Idaho, is not used or needed for public
purposes. The portion of such Street is more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Pursuant to the provisions of Idaho Code Sections 50-311 and 50-1325, as amended,
such portion is hereby vacated in favor of the adjacent landowners named in Section 3 of this
Ordinance.
Section 3. Execution of Quitclaim Deed to Shane Williams and Julia L.
Buckwalter. The portion of such Street, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, is
vacated in favor of the following land owners:
Name Address
Shane Williams and 5411 Free Ave.
Julia L. Buckwalter Iona, Idaho 83427
Section 4. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-311, the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby
authorized and directed to execute and deliver a Quitclaim Deed conveying said vacated
street to said owners, subject to any existing utility easements for the operation, maintenance
or replacement of existing water lines, sewer lines, gas lines or other public utility lines.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage, execution and publication in the manner provided by law.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL AND APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day
of , 2016.
ATTEST:
Shara Roberts
City Clerk
(Seal)
Brad Andersen
Mayor
-2-
STATE OF IDAHO
County of Bonneville
)
)ss
)
I, SHARA ROBERTS, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF IONA, IDAHO, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY:
That the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Ordinance entitled,
"AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.104, ORDINANCES OF THE CITY
OF IONA, IDAHO; REPEALING SECTION 9 OF SUCH ORDINANCE; VACATING A
PORTION OF DAYTON STREET IN THE CITY OF IONA, IDAHO; AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY A QUITCLAIM DEED VACATING A PORTION OF
DAYTON STREET IN THE CITY OF IONA CONVEYING THE VACATED STREET TO
THE OWNER OF THE ADJACENT LAND, AND NAMING THEM; PROVIDING FOR
EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE."
Shara Roberts
City Clerk
-3-
EXHIBIT A
Part of Dayton Street right-of-way in the Denning Addition to the Village of Iona per the
recorded plat filed in the Bonneville County courthouse, Instrument No. 3189911 and also
part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE 1/4 NE 1/4) of Section 12,
Township 2 North„ Range 38 East of the Boise Meridian, Bonneville County Idaho
described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot 6, Block 8, Denning Addition to the Village of
Iona per the recorded plat filed in the Bonneville County courthouse, Instrument No.
3189911; thence S.85°52'20"W. 29.45 feet along the north right-of-way line of Free
Avenue extended to the Southeast comer of the parcel as described in Exhibit "H",
Ordinance 104, Instrument No. 1249320; thence N.00°1420"W. 151.95 feet along the east
line of said parcel to the south line of Ashwood Acres, Division No. 1, an addition to the
City of Iona, Bonneville County, Idaho, Instnunent No. 1003199; thence N.86°03'37"E.
29.44 feet along said south line to the easterly right-of-way line of Dayton Street and the
west line of Lot 6, Block 8, Denning Addition to the Village of Iona; thence S.00°14'20"E.
151.85 feet to the point of beginning
Parcel contains 4,463 square feet.
GAWPDATAIDWS12708 CityoflotakStreet Vacadot eDtyton Vaatioo.ORD.2.wpt nn
-4-
PHOTO MAP
A TLls
eIN
Acourtesy of:
Iona
L
AMERITITLE LAND INFORMATION SYSTEM
County 1..:? City LI. UGB
Property of Interest
Disclaimer.
This map was created from digital databases provided by the
Bonneville CountyGlS Dept, AmenTitle has provided this information
as a courtesy and assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or the
positional accuracy of the data, and does not warranty the fitness of
this product for any particular purpose.
Annual Drinking Water Quality Report for - 2015
City of Iona
PWS #7100041
As your back-up licensed drinking water operator and mayor I am pleased to present to you this year's Annual Water
Quality Report. This report is designed to inform you about the quality water and services we deliver to you every
day. Our constant goal is to provide you with a safe and dependable supply of drinking water. We want you to
understand the efforts we make to continually improve and protect our water resources. We are committed to
ensuring the quality of your water. Our water source is (i.e., groundwater, well) from the East Snake River Plain
Aquifer.
I am pleased to report that your drinking water is safe and meets federal and state requirements. A source water
assessment was completed for your water system. Your system received a rating of "moderate" because of past
historical data and where your water source is located (i.e., agriculture area). If you would like a copy of this report
you can contact the Division of Environmental Quality (DEQ) or the City of Iona. If you have any questions about
this report or concerning your water utility, please contact Zech Prouse our Public Works Director and license
Drinking Water Operator at 523-5600. We want our valued customers to be informed about their water utility.
Please contact the City of Iona of the next scheduled city council meeting.
City of Iona routinely monitors for contaminants in your drinking water according to Federal and State laws. This
table shows the results of our monitoring for the period of January 1 S` to December 315`, 2015. As water travels over
the land or underground it can pick up substances or contaminants such as microbes, inorganic and organic
chemicals, and radioactive substances. All drinking water, including bottled drinking water, may be reasonably
expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. It's important to remember that the presence of
these contaminants does not necessarily pose a health risk.
In this table you will find many terms and abbreviations you might not be familiar with. To help you better
understand these terms we've provided the following definitions:
Non -Detects (ND) - laboratory analysis indicates that the constituent is not present.
Parts per million (ppm) or Milligrams per liter (mg/1) - one part per million corresponds to one minute in two years
or a single penny in $10,000.
Parts per billion (ppb) or Micrograms per liter - one part per billion corresponds to one minute in 2,000 years, or a
single penny in $10,000,000.
Pico curies per liter (pCi/L) - Pico curies per liter are a measure of the radioactivity in water.
Millirems per year (mrem/yr) - measure of radiation absorbed by the body.
Action Level - the concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements which
a water system must follow.
Treatment Technique (TT) - (mandatory language) a treatment technique is a required process intended to reduce the
level of a contaminant in drinking water.
Maximum Contaminant Level - (mandatory language) The "Maximum Allowed" (MCL) is the highest level of a
contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs as feasible using the best
available treatment technology.
Maximum Contaminant Level Goal - (mandatory language) The "Goal" (MCLG) is the level of a contaminant in
drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety.
Exhibit "G"
TEST RESULTS
Contaminant
Violation
Y/N
Level
Detected
Unit
Measurement
MCLG
MCL
Likely Source of Contamination
Microbiological Contaminants
1. Total Coliform
Bacteria
N*
Present
Presence or
Absent
0
> 1
Naturally present in the environment
2. Fecal coliform
and E.coli
N
Absent
Presence or
Absent
0
a routine
sample
and
repeat
sample
are total
coliform
positive,
and one
is also
fecal
coliform
or E. coli
positive
Human and animal fecal waste
3. Turbidity
N
0
NTU
n/a
TT
Soil runoff
Radioactive Contaminants
4. Beta/photon emitters
#2 well
N
4.85
mrem/yr
0
4
Decay of natural and man-made deposits
5. Alpha emitters #2
well/#3
N
2.99
2.39
pCi/1
0
15
Erosion of natural deposits
6. Combined radium
#2 well/#3
N
1.29,
0.08
pCi/1
0
5
Erosion of natural deposits
Inorganic Contaminants
7. Antimony
N
0
ppb
6
6
Discharge from petroleum refineries; fire
retardants; ceramics; electronics; solder
8. Arsenic
Well # 1 /#3
N
1.0
ppb
0
10
Erosion of natural deposits; runoff from
orchards; runoff from glass and
electronics production wastes
9. Asbestos
N
0
MFL
7
7
Decay of asbestos cement water mains;
erosion of natural deposits
10. Barium
Well #1/#2
N
0.122
&
0.102
ppm
2
2
Discharge of drilling wastes; discharge
from metal refineries; erosion of natural
deposits
11. Beryllium
N
0
ppb
4
4
Discharge from metal refineries and coal -
burning factories; discharge from
electrical, aerospace, and defense
industries
12. Cadmium
N
0
ppb
5
5
Corrosion of galvanized pipes; erosion of
natural deposits; discharge from metal
refineries; runoff from waste batteries and
paints
13. Chromium
N
0
ppb
100
100
Discharge from steel and pulp mills;
erosion of natural deposits
14. Copper
10 samples collected
N
.18
ppm
1.3
AL=1.3
Corrosion of household plumbing
systems; erosion of natural deposits;
leaching from wood preservatives
15. Cyanide
N
0
ppb
200
200
Discharge from steel/metal factories;
discharge from plastic and fertilizer
factories
16. Fluoride
N
0
ppm
4
4
Erosion of natural deposits; water
additive which promotes strong teeth;
discharge from fertilizer and aluminum
factories
17. Lead
10 samples collected
N
4
ppb
0
AL=15
Corrosion of household plumbing
systems, erosion of natural deposits
18. Mercury
(inorganic)
N
0
ppb
2
2
Erosion of natural deposits; discharge
from refineries and factories; runoff from
landfills; runoff from cropland
19. Nitrate
(as Nitrogen)
Well #1,42, & #3
N
1.71,
1.42 ,
& 1.65
ppm
10
10
Runoff from fertilizer use; leaching from
septic tanks, sewage; erosion of natural
deposits
20. Nitrite
(as Nitrogen)
N
0
ppm
1
1
Runoff from fertilizer use; leaching from
septic tanks, sewage; erosion of natural
deposits
21. Selenium
N
0
ppb
50
50
Discharge from petroleum and metal
refineries; erosion of natural deposits;
discharge from mines
22. Thallium
N
0
ppb
0.5
2
Leaching from ore -processing sites;
discharge from electronics, glass, and
drug factories
Synthetic Organic Contaminants including Pesticides and Herbicides
23. 2,4-D
N
0
ppb
70
70
Runoff from herbicide used on row crops
24. 2,4,5-TP
(Silvex)
N
0
ppb
50
50
Residue of banned herbicide
25. Acrylamide
N
0
0
TT
Added to water during
sewage/wastewater treatment
26. Alachlor
N
0
ppb
0
2
Runoff from herbicide used on row crops
27. Atrazine
N
0
ppb
3
3
Runoff from herbicide used on row crops
28. Benzo(a)pyrene
(PAH)
N
0
nanograms/1
0
200
Leaching from linings of water storage
tanks and distribution lines
29. Carbofuran
N
0
ppb
40
40
Leaching of soil fumigant used on rice
and alfalfa
30. Chlordane
N
0
ppb
0
2
Residue of banned termiticide
31. Dalapon
N
0
ppb
200
200
Runoff from herbicide used on rights of
way
32. Di(2-ethylhexyl)
adipate
N
0
ppb
400
400
Discharge from chemical factories
33. Di(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate
N
0
ppb
0
6
Discharge from rubber and chemical
factories
34. Dibromochloro-
propane
N
0
nanograms/1
0
200
Runoff/leaching from soil fumigant used
on soybeans, cotton, pineapples, and
orchards
35. Dinoseb
N
0
ppb
7
7
Runoff from herbicide used on soybeans
and vegetables
36. Diquat
N
0
ppb
20
20
Runoff from herbicide use
37. Dioxin
[2,3,7,8-TCDD]
N
0
picograms/1
0
30
Emissions from waste incineration and
other combustion; discharge from
chemical factories
38. Endothall
N
0
ppb
100
100
Runoff from herbicide use
39. Endrin
N
0
ppb
2
2
Residue of banned insecticide
40. Epichlorohydrin
N
0
0
TT
Discharge from industrial chemical
factories; an impurity of some water
treatment chemicals
41.Ethylene dibromide
N
0
nanograms/1
0
50
Discharge from petroleum refineries
42. Glyphosate
N
0
ppb
700
700
Runoff from herbicide use
43. Heptachlor
N
0
nanograms/1
0
400
Residue of banned termiticide
44.Heptachlor epoxide
N
0
nanograms/1
0
200
Breakdown of heptachlor
45.Hexachlorobenzene
N
0
ppb
0
1
Discharge from metal refineries and
agricultural chemical factories
46.Hexachlorocyclo-
pentadiene
N
0
ppb
50
50
Discharge from chemical factories
47. Lindane
N
0
nanograms/1
200
200
Runoff/leaching from insecticide used on
cattle, lumber, gardens
48. Methoxychlor
N
0
ppb
40
40
Runoff/leaching from insecticide used on
fruits, vegetables, alfalfa, livestock
49. Oxamyl [Vydate]
N
0
ppb
200
200
Runoff/leaching from insecticide used on
apples, potatoes and tomatoes
50. PCBs
[Polychlorinated
biphenyls]
N
0
nanograms/1
0
500
Runoff from landfills; discharge of waste
chemicals
51. Pentachlorophenol
N
0
ppb
0
1
Discharge from wood preserving factories
52. Picloram
N
0
ppb
500
500
Herbicide runoff
53. Simazine
N
0
ppb
4
4
Herbicide runoff
54. Toxaphene
N
0
ppb
0
3
Runoff/leaching from insecticide used on
cotton and cattle
Volatile Organic Contaminants
55. Benzene
N
0
ppb
0
5
Discharge from factories; leaching from
gas storage tanks and landfills
56. Carbon
tetrachloride
N
0
ppb
0
5
Discharge from chemical plants and other
industrial activities
57. Chlorobenzene
N
0
ppb
100
100
Discharge from chemical and agricultural
chemical factories
58. o-Dichlorobenzene
N
0
ppb
600
600
Discharge from industrial chemical
factories
59. p-Dichlorobenzene
N
0
ppb
75
75
Discharge from industrial chemical
factories
60. 1,2-
Dichloroethane
N
0
ppb
0
5
Discharge from industrial chemical
factories
61. 1,1 -
Dichloroethylene
N
0
ppb
7
7
Discharge from industrial chemical
factories
62. cis-1,2-
Dichloroethylene
N
0
ppb
70
70
Discharge from industrial chemical
factories
63. trans - 1,2 -
Dichloroethylene
N
0
ppb
100
100
Discharge from industrial chemical
factories
64. Dichloromethane
N
0
ppb
0
5
Discharge from pharmaceutical and
chemical factories
65. 1,2-
Dichloropropane
N
0
ppb
0
5
Discharge from industrial chemical
factories
66. Ethylbenzene
N
0
ppb
700
700
Discharge from petroleum refineries
67. Styrene
N
0
ppb
100
100
Discharge from rubber and plastic
factories; leaching from landfills
68. Tetrachloroethylene
N
0
ppb
0
5
Leaching from PVC pipes; discharge
from factories and dry cleaners
69. 1,2,4-
Trichlorobenzene
N
0
ppb
70
70
Discharge from textile -finishing factories
70. 1,1,1 -
Trichloroethane
N
0
ppb
200
200
Discharge from metal degreasing sites
and other factories
71. 1,1,2 -
Trichloroethane
N
0
ppb
3
5
Discharge from industrial chemical
factories
72. Trichloroethylene
N
0
ppb
0
5
Discharge from metal degreasing sites
and other factories
73. TTHM
[Total
trihalomethanes]
N
0
ppb
0
100
By-product of drinking water
chlorination
74. Toluene
N
0
ppm
1
1
Discharge from petroleum factories
75. Vinyl Chloride
N
0
ppb
0
2
Leaching from PVC piping; discharge
from plastics factories
1 76. Xylenes
N
0
ppm
10
10
Discharge from petroleum factories;
discharge from chemical factories
77. Uranium
N
1.90
ppb
0
30
Erosion of natural deposits.
As you can see by the table, our system had no violations, but there was a detection of total coliform bacteria in the
month of February and October. The coliform bacteria in the month of October was a result of some brief hydrant
flushing the department performed earlier in the month. We're proud that your drinking water meets or exceeds all
Federal and State requirements. We have learned through our monitoring and testing that some constituents have
been detected. The EPA has determined that your water IS SAFE at these levels.
All sources of drinking water are subject to potential contamination by substances that are naturally occurring or man
made. These substances can be microbes, inorganic or organic chemicals and radioactive substances. All drinking
water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants.
The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that the water poses a health risk. More information
about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the Environmental Protection Agency's
Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1-800-426-4791.
MCL's are set at very stringent levels. To understand the possible health effects described for many regulated
constituents, a person would have to drink 2 liters of water every day at the MCL level for a lifetime to have a one -
in -a -million chance of having the described health effect.
*Total Coliform: The Total Coliform Rule requires water systems to meet a strict limit for coliform bacteria.
Coliform bacteria are usually harmless, but their presence in water can be an indication of disease -causing bacteria.
When coliform bacteria are found, special follow-up tests are done to determine if harmful bacteria are present in the
water supply. If this limit is exceeded, the water supplier must notify the public by newspaper, television or radio.
February and October 2015 total Coliform bacteria was detected. February total coliform bacteria was detected at
well #3 because of stagnant water due to the well being used on a limited bases. October bacteria was due to a water
main break. Since the disinfecting of the tank and water system there has not been any detection of bacteria since
October 24`h 2015.
Nitrates: As a precaution we always notify physicians and health care providers in this area if there is ever a higher
than normal level of nitrates in the water supply.
Lead: Lead in drinking water is rarely the sole cause of lead poisoning, but it can add to a person's total lead
exposure. All potential sources of lead in the household should be identified and removed, replaced or reduced.
In our continuing efforts to maintain a safe and dependable water supply it may be necessary to make improvements
in your water system. The costs of these improvements may be reflected in the rate structure. Rate adjustments may
be necessary in order to address these improvements.
Thank you for allowing us to continue providing your family with clean, quality water this year. In order to maintain
a safe and dependable water supply we sometimes need to make improvements that will benefit all of our customers.
These improvements are sometimes reflected as rate structure adjustments. Thank you for understanding.
Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Immuno-
compromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ
transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be particularly
at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers.
EPA/CDC guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by cryptosporidium and other
microbiological contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline (800-426-4791).
Please call our City of Iona Office if you have questions.
City of Iona works around the clock to provide top quality water to every tap, "said Public Works Supervisor
Zech Prouse." We ask that all our customers help us protect our water sources, which are the heart of our
community, our way of life and our children's future. Please call Zech Prouse @ 523-5600 if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
Brad D. Andersen, Mayor