HomeMy Public PortalAboutMinutes - 1996/06/04 - Regular1
1
TEMPLE CITY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MINUTES
JUNE 4, 1996
INITIATION:
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Pursuant to the Agenda posted May 31, 1996, Chairman Wilson called the meeting of the Temple
City Redevelopment Agency to order at 8:59 p.m. on Tuesday, June 4, 1996.
2. ROLL CALL -
PRESENT: Member - Budds, Gillanders, Souder, Wilson
ABSENT: Member - Breazeal
ALSO PRESENT: Executive Director Riley, General Counsel Martin and Assistant Executive
Director Dawson
Mr. Gillanders moved to excuse Mr. Breazeal for cause, seconded by Mr. Budds and unanimously
carried.
3. TIME FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK: NONE
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Mr Gillanders moved to approve the Consent Calendar as presented, seconded by Mr. Budds and
unanimously carried.
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular meeting of May 21, 1996.
Approved the Minutes from the regular meeting of May 21, 1996, as submitted.
B. RESOLUTION NO. CRA 96 -603: APPROVAL OF PAYMENT OF BILLS
Adopted Resolution No. CRA 96 -603, allowing claims and demands in the amount of
$10,253.29.
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
6. NEW BUSINESS:
None
A. PUBLIC BEARING: PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996 -97
Executive Director Riley presented the background information as outlined in the
staff report dated June 4, 1996.
Chairman Wilson declared the public hearing open and invited those wishing to
speak on this matter to come forward at this time.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mr. Gillanders moved to close the public
hearing, seconded by Mr. Budds and unanimously carried.
Mr. Budds moved to refer adoption of the proposed FY 1996 -97 Budget to June
18, 1996, seconded by Vice Chairman Souder and unanimously carried.
B. AUTO CARE CENTER AT 5546 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD - CRA BLOCK "E9
Assistant Executive Director Dawson presented the background information as
outlined in the staff report dated June 4, 1996.
Agency Minutes, June 4, 1996
Page 2
Vice Chairman Souder said it appears the applicant is proposing a mini mall
situation with separately owned businesses, but no detail or plot plan has been
provided.
Director Dawson agreed one individual would own the building and lease
individual . nits to separate business owners. Part of the request is that the mini
mall restriction be removed from the Design for Development criteria.
Executive Director Riley explained the property owner is attempting to develop
the site. Removal of the restrictions would allow the applicant to apply for a
conditional use permit for an auto care center.
Mr Gillanders expressed concern with use of the parking spaces for storage of
vehicles waiting for repairs.
Director Dawson pointed out the applicant will not submit a plan until the policy
issue can be resolved. The applicant has provided sketches for staff review and
addressed the lay out of the parking, but these have not been made available to
the City Council.
Mr. Budds stressed the decision made by the Agency will affect the entire Block
E. Attempts have been made to improve the area and he did not want to see
other mini malls on the same block, especially since no plot plan has been
submitted.
City Attorney Martin explained that Exhibit "A" imposes limitations for Block E.
The applicant has requested the one acre minimum and mini mall restrictions be
removed. The Agency may wish to grant the request or a portion of the request
or wait until a definitive plot plan is developed.
Director Dawson said the applicant has stated that they can meet the mini mall
standards as set forth in the Zoning Code.
Jeff " _lot, 1405 San Marino Avenue, Suite 107, San Marino, stated he did not
cons: .er the auto care center a mini mall. However, the mini mall standards can
be met if that determination was made.
Director Dawson pointed out the definition of a mini mall is a single piece of
property with one ownership but with multiple commercial or service units.
Mr. Talbot said the property owner has not been successful in acquiring the
required acre and cannot redevelop the property with the existing restrictions.
Mr. :dds moved to make no changes to the existing design for development for
Block 1 " at this time, seconded by Mr. Souder and unanimously carried.
FREE- STANDING SIGNAGE AT TEMPLE CITY SQUARE
The applicant requested the request be continued to the next Community
Redevelopment Agency meeting. The Agency concurred.
7. COMMUNICATIONS: None
1
1
1
1
1
Agency Minutes, June 4, 1996
Page 3
8. MATTERS FROM AGENCY MEMBERS: None
9. ADJOURNMENT:
At 9:25 p.m., it was moved, seconded and unanimously carried to adjourn. The next regular
meeting of the Temple City Community Redevelopment Agency will be held on Tuesday, June 18,
1996.
ATTEST:
ecritary..
Chairman
gaitAr: &Chi/Jo)