HomeMy Public PortalAboutARPB 05 24 2012 w/ backupCHAIRMAN:
VICE CHAIRMAN:
BOARD MEMBER:
ALTERNATE MEMBER:
Robert Ganger
Scott Morgan
Paul A. Lyons, Jr.
Thomas Smith
Malcolm Murphy
Amanda Jones
Thomas M. Stanley
May 17, 2012
REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING BEING HELD BY THE ARCHITECTURAL
REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM, FLORIDA ON
THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2012 AT 8:30 A.M., IN THE TOWN HALL, 100 SEA ROAD,
GULF STREAM, FLORIDA.
I. Call to Order.
II. Roll Call.
III. Minutes of the Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of 4-26-12.
IV. Additions, withdrawals, deferrals, arrangement of agenda items.
V. Announcements.
A. Meeting Dates
1. Regular Meeting & Public Hearing
a. June 28, 2012 @ 8:30 A.M.
b. July 26, 2012 @ 8:30 A.M.
c. No meeting in August
d. September 27, 2012 @ 8:30 A.M.
e. October 25, 2012 @ 8:30 A.M.
f. November to be determined
g. December 27, 2012 @ 8:30 A.M.
VI. PUBLIC HEARING.
A. Applications for Development Approval
1. An application submitted by James F. & Pamela
Landquist, owners of the property located at 800 Tangerine
Way, Gulf Stream, Florida, which is legally described as
Lot 16, Place Au Soleil Subdivision.
a. SPECIAL EXCEPTION to permit a 155 sq. ft. garage
addition to the existing 396 sq. ft. garage that
encroaches 7.8 ft. into the required 20 ft. rear
setback.
b. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW to permit a 155
sq. ft. garage addition to the existing Gulf Stream
Bermuda Style single family dwelling.
2. An application submitted by John & Elisabeth Woolley,
owners of property located at 935 Orchid Lane, legally
described as Lot 88, Place Au Soleil Subdivision, Gulf
Stream Florida.
a. LEVEL 2 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW to permit the
replacement of existing broken, awning type windows in
all existing openings visible from the street with
triple horizontal sliders. The sliders will have
impact glass set in white frames.
B. Ordinances
1. No. 12/2; AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COMMISSION OF.THE TOWN
OF GULF STREAM, PALM BEACH, COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE
TOWN'S ZONING MAP TO REZONE 12 PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY
COMPRISING APPROXIMATELY 16.6 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN
SIZE; SUCH REAL PROPERTY IS LOCATED GENERALLY EAST AND
WEST OF STATE ROAD AlA, SOUTH OF LITTLE CLUB ROAD AND
NORTH OF SEA ROAD; FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNMTY DESIGNATION
OF RM -MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (MEDIUM DENSITY) TO THE
AGENDA CONTINUED
TOWN OF GULF STREAM ZONING DESIGNATION OF "RM" (MULTIPLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT); PROVIDING THAT THE TOWN
ZONING DISTRICT MAP BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREOF; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
2. NO. 12/3; AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COMMISSION OF THE TOWN
OF GULF STREAM, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE
TOWN'S CODE OF ORDINANCES, AT SECTION 71-1, TO INCLUDE
NEWLY -ANNEXED PROPERTIES UNDER THE RM -EAST AND RM -WEST
ZONING DESIGNATIONS; AMENDING, AT SECTION 66-131, THE NON-
CONFORMING USE REGULATIONS TO ADDRESS STRUCTURES WITH A
NON -CONFORMING DENSITY; ADDING SECTION 71-8, ADDITIONS AND
REHABILITATIONS, TO INCLUDE REFERENCE TO STANDARDS FOR
ADDITIONS AND REHABILITATION OF MULTI -FAMILY BUILDINGS;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
VII. Items by Staff.
A. Proposed Zoning Code Changes
1. Section 70-71, Floor Area Ratio (continued from 4-26-12)
VIII. Items by Board Members.
IX. Public.
X. Adjournment.
SHOULD ANY INTERESTED PARTY SEEK TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER
CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, SAID PARTY WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE, MAY NEED TO INSURE THAT A VERBATIM
RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY
AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 286.0105, F.S.S.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM,
FLORIDA ON THURSDAY, APRIL 26, 2012 AT 8:30 A.M., IN THE TOWN HALL, 100
SEA ROAD, GULF STREAM, FLORIDA.
I. Call to Order.
II. Roll Call.
Present and
Participating
Absent w/Notice
Also Present and
Participating
Chairman Ganger called to order at 8:30 A.M.
Robert W. Ganger
Scott Morgan
Paul Lyons, Jr.
Malcolm Murphy
Tom Smith
Thomas M. Stanley
Malcolm Murphy
Amanda Jones
William H. Thrasher
Rita L. Taylor
John Randolph
Mark Marsh, Bridges,
& Assoc.
Marty Minor of Urban
Design Kilday Studios
Chairman
Vice -Chairman
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Alt. Member sitting as
Board Member
Board Member
Alt. Member
Town Manager
Town Clerk
Town Attorney
Agent/Davis
Town Consultant
III. Minutes of the Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of 3-22-12.
Vice -Chairman Morgan moved and Mr. Smith seconded to approve the Minutes
of the Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of March 23, 2012. There was
no discussion. All voted AYE.
IV. Additions, withdrawals, deferrals, arrangement of agenda items.
There were no changes.
V. Announcements.
A. Meeting Dates
1. Regular Meeting & Public Hearing
a. May 24, 2012 @ 8:30 A.M.
b. June 28, 2012 @ 8:30 A.M.
c. July 26, 2012 @ 8:30 A.M.
d. No meeting in August
e. September 27, 2012 @ 8:30 A.M.
Chairman Ganger asked the Board Members if there were any conflicts in
the meeting schedule. Vice -Chairman Morgan stated that he would not be
available for the May 24th meeting. Mr. Lyons stated that he would not
be available for the July 26th meeting. Chairman Ganger said he is
hoping that, at the end of this meeting, the Board will have concluded
the re -writing of the ordinances and that it will go to the Commission
for 1st reading at their May 11th meeting. Clerk Taylor said the ARPB
recommendations will go to the Commission, but they will not be in
ordinance form. She said one ordinance is prepared and is sufficient;
however, she said it was decided to hold the ordinance until the process
is complete. Chairman Ganger said he will assume that 15t and 2nd
readings will have been done by the Fall. Chairman Ganger said the
Regular Meeting and Public Hearing
Architectural Review and Planning Board - April 26, 2012 Page 2
public is very interested in what the ARPB is doing to make changes in
the Code and they feel it has taken a long time. Clerk Taylor said the
public will have to understand that these things take time. Chairman
Ganger said it would be to the public's benefit to attend the meetings.
VI. Reorganization of ARPB.
A. Swearing in of re -appointed members
Clerk Taylor administered the Oath to Robert W. Ganger, Scott Morgan and
Tom Smith who were re -appointed to the ARPB for another 3 -year term.
B. Election of Chairman
Mr. Morgan moved and Mr. Lyons seconded to nominate Robert W. Ganger as
Chairman. There was no discussion. All voted AYE.
C. Election of Vice Chairman
Mr. Smith moved and Mr. Lyons seconded to nominate Scott Morgan as Vice -
Chairman. There was no discussion. All voted AYE.
VII. Items Related to Previous Approvals.
Clerk Taylor administered the Oath to Mark Marsh, Agent for Davis, and
to James Davis, property owner. Chairman Ganger asked Clerk Taylor to
go through the timeline concerning this matter. Clerk Taylor said this
project was first presented to the ARPB one year ago this month and, at
that time, the ARPB recommended approval with the condition of a "grey
roof." She said the project and ARPB recommendations were presented to
the Commission in May of 2011 and the Commission approved the ARPB
recommendations, with the exception of the roof tile. Clerk Taylor said
the Commission asked to see a roof tile sample and then Mr. Marsh
distributed photos of similar roofs, including a photo of the Ocean
Ridge Town Hall. She said the Commission approved the roof tile with
the condition that they see a sample of the roof tile material, but she
said nothing happened until recently. Clerk Taylor said Mr. Marsh came
back to the ARPB on January 26th with changes to the design of the house,
there was no discussion with regard to the roof material, but she said
the commitment was made that the ARPB would need to review any
revisions. Mark Marsh said he would come back to ARPB with an actual
roof tile sample which he said would be closer to the Ocean Ridge Town
Hall roof tile. Clerk Taylor said the ARPB's Motion stipulated that the
adjustment of color and texture of the roof tile was to come back to the
ARPB for approval, which is what Mr. Marsh will present today. However,
Clerk Taylor said, as result of the Commission asking to see the tile
one year ago, the ARPB will be able to make their recommendations today
for the Commission to consider at the May 11th meeting.
Chairman Ganger asked if there has been any ex -parte communication. He
said he drove by the Davis property this morning. There were no other
declarations of ex -parte communication.
A. Change of roof tile at 554 Palm Way submitted by Mark Marsh
as Agent for Mr. & Mrs. James Davis.
Mark Marsh said he initially presented a tile that had a bit of a glaze
and he is now proposing a smaller tile with a matt finish. He said the
architectural style of the home is Cape Dutch which typically features a
white exterior with a dark grey roof. Mr. Marsh displayed the smaller
Regular Meeting and Public Hearing
Architectural Review and Planning Board - April 26, 2012 Page 3
tile with a matt finish, the color of which is called natural slate and
he said it is equal or superior to the other white tile. He said you
will not see much of the roof because of the pitch. Mr. Marsh said the
tile on Ocean Ridge Town Hall is a blend of black, grey and white and
the Entegra tile he is proposing is a solid color. He said he would
like to encourage diversity and the architectural style merits contrast.
Chairman Ganger asked Mr. Marsh about the color of the shutters. Mr.
Marsh said they will be gun metal grey. Vice -Chairman Morgan commented
that he likes the roof tile and agrees that the architectural style
warrants contrast. Mr. Smith also commented that he likes the roof tile
more than the previous tile proposed. Chairman Ganger reminded the
Board Members that at the last meeting the Board made the decision that
roof tile must be white or slate, not slate -like. He said the minutes
from that meeting state that roof tile shall be flat, white thru and
thru, smooth, un -coated tile, except that gray slate may be permitted
on homes that are predominately Georgian or British Colonial with
Bermuda influences. The Town Clerk advised that this provision was only
applied to Section 70-238. It was suggested to revisit the Code changes
and possibly build the Cape Dutch architectural style into the Code.
Vice -Chairman Morgan said the gray roof should be limited to this
architectural style with the white exterior.
Mr. Smith moved and Mr. Lyons seconded to recommend approval of the
proposed solid through and through dark cement tile. There was no
discussion. All voted AYE.
VIII. Items by Staff.
A. Proposed Zoning Code Changes
1. Section 70-71, Floor Area Ratio
Mr. Minor reminded that there has been a concern with houses appearing
to be more "box -like". He further reminded that in discussions of FAR
Calculations, attention had been given to adding more visual interest to
the design. In so doing, porches, balconies, etc. that were roofed but
not enclosed were included in the FAR calculation. In addition, this
would limit the size of homes. The result has been that this interest
and the required 25% reduction of the size of the 2nd floor as compared
to the size of the 1st floor, for the most part, is being concentrated
in one area, often the rear, which adds to a box -like appearance. He
then explained 4 options to possibly improve the design. These are:
Eliminate porches, patios, balconies and arcades from the FAR
calculations up to 400 square feet.
Allow additional FAR for the lot if the second story of the home is
set back a minimum of 10 feet from the front setback line. We have
provided three options for the increase in FAR for this second
story setback for the ARPB's consideration.
Limit the second floor area of homes to be .75 of the first floor
area in all single family zoning districts.
Regular Meeting and Public Hearing
Architectural Review and Planning Board - April 26, 2012 Page 4
Allow front porches and balconies to extend within front setback.
With regard to Option 1, there was no vote but it was thought that the
current provision which allows an additional 300 square feet through a
Special Exception better fits with regard to open porches etc. due to
the accompanying deed restriction that prevents the open, roofed areas
from being enclosed.
It was unanimously voted to provide the suggested incentive FAR in
Option 2 by adding 5% allowable FAR to the portion of square footage of
the lot over the first 20,000 sq. ft provided the 2nd floor was setback
an additional 10' from the front property line. The motion was made by
Mr. Lyons and seconded by Mr. Morgan. It was felt this may help to
reduce the box -like appearance of the structure.
With regard to Option 3, it was moved by Mr. Morgan and seconded by Mr.
Lyons that the current 75% reduction of the 2nd floor be further reduced
to 70% of the 1st floor area in all single family districts to also
address the problem of a box -like appearance. No vote was taken but the
discussion indicated the members favored this change.
There was very little discussion on Option 4 and it is expected this
along with all of the other options will be further discussed at the
next meeting.
Chairman Ganger observed that most of the options are incentive driven
which may not solve the box -like appearance. He ask Mr. Minor if he
could offer any additional solutions for consideration after hearing
this discussion. He added that he did not believe the Town is
interested in adding strict mandatory provisions.
Mr. Minor replied that he may
for consideration at the next
2. Section 70-68,
There were no recommendations
IX. Items by Board Members
be able to offer a few more suggestions
meeting.
Lot Size & Dimensional Requirements
to change this section.
There were no items by Board Members.
X. Public. There were no items by the Public.
XI. Adjournment. Mr. Smith moved and Vice -Chairman Morgan seconded
to adjourn the meeting. There was no discussion. The meeting was
adjourned at approximately 10:25 A.M.
Gail C. Abbale
Administrative Assistant
TOWN OF GULF STREAM
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING REPORT
Application #: 012 -04
Address: 800 Tangerine Way
Proposed Improvement:
Approvals Requested:
Owner: James F & Pamela Landquist
Agent: Self
Garage addition
Special Exception: To permit a 155 SF garage addition to the existing 396
SF garage that encroaches 7.8 feet into the required 20
feet required setback.
Level III Architectural /Site Plan:
Gross Lot size: 14,375 SF
Proposed Total Floor Area: 3,336 SF
Zoning District: RS -P
Finished Floor: N/A
Issues Considered During Review:
Section 70 -67 Effective lot area
Section 70 -70 Floor area calculations
Section 70 -74 Setbacks
To permit a 155 SF garage addition to the existing Gulf
Stream Bermuda style single family dwelling.
Effective Lot Area: 14,375 SF
Allowable: 4,744
Height: 13.5'
Section 70 -75 Special exception setbacks (c) Additions to structures with existing nonconforming
setbacks.
Note: Application appears to meet the standards for approval.
Section 70 -100 Roof and eave heights
Motion to recommend approval for a Special Exception to permit a 155 SF garage addition to
the existing 396 SF garage that encroaches 7.8 feet into the required 20 feet required setback.
Motion to recommend approval Level III Architectural /Site Plan based on a finding that the
proposed 155 SF garage addition to the existing Gulf Stream Bermuda style single family
dwelling meets the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards.
ARPB Date: May 24, 2012
Action:
Special Exception: Recommend approval as requested. (4 -0)
Level III Architectural/ Site Plan: Recommend approval as requested (4 -0)
TC Date: June 8, 2012
Action:
Special Exception Approved as requested & recommended. (4 -0)
Level III Architectural/ Site Plan: Approved as requested and recommended including
proposed landscaping. (4 -0)
Town of Gulf Stream
TOWN OF GULF STREAM
QRECEIVr
APP i 69?
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
This form is to be used for all development review applications to be heard by the Town of Gulf Stream
Architectural Review and Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, and /or Town Commission. To complete the
form properly, please review the accompanying Town of Gulf Stream Instruction Manual for Application for
Development Review Form. Failure to complete this form properly will delay its consideration.
ARPB File #
To be completed by all applicants. PART II. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Project Information
I.A.I . Project/Owner Name: UA-M -ES 4:-1 (- RN (Q0 t) t S'r A-(VQ P4/kEG4 L WOO-01 S T
I.A.2. Project Address: 800 T*116jF-rL(Il/ IF VVAY Got r �T��� � � 33'l Y&
I.A.3. Project Property Legal Description: L d T J6., pttfcE 4d SOLE / L
I.A.4. Project Description (describe in detail, including # of stories, etc.). ADD ,.q f X 19114" •-M
n
V WA,
I.A.5. Square Footage of New Structure or Addition: 16--5- —eGL T--f
Architectural Style: _ WILH F-- Xt ' l K ) L-
1
.A.6. Check all that apply:' Architectural /Site Plan Review ❑ Land Clearing ❑ North Ocean Boulevard
Overlay (complete section B) ❑ Demolition of Structures ❑ Non - residential uses ❑ Variance
(complete section G) W Special Exception (complete section E)
1.A.7. (a) Proposed F.F.E.:
B. Owner Information
Type of Foundation: SI P OH 606,'Dt-
I.B. I . Owner Address: 906 Tij -N6 IE ! Al '_?,e/�3
1.B.2. Owner Phone Number: -5-1PI 76(o -776& Fax: S 7'4 - 0((1 114
1.B.3. Owner Signature:
C. Agent Information
I.C.1. Agent Name and Firm Name: se %-
I.C.2. Agent Address:
I.C.3. Agent Phone Number: (o) cell Fax
1.C.4. Agent Signature:
Official Use Only
Pre -App Date: ARPB Date:
App Date: Recommendation:
Corn Date: TC Date:
Decision:
3 S Y3 14
Application for Development Approval Form ADA.2000
revised 6/13/00
Page 2
Town of Gulf Stream
PART III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION
To be completed by all applicants after pre - application conference with Town Staff Please be concise but
brief. Attach additional sheets only when necessary and be sure to include the a
question number for each response. Please
and complete
A. Project Description and Justification
III.A.1. In what zoning district is the project site located? L P 5 ` 10
III.A.2. Is the project compatible with the intent of the zoning district? VYes ❑ No
Explain. Co
III.A.3. Is the project consistent with the Future Land Use Map and goals, objectives and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan? ;'Yes ❑ No
Explain,
III.A.4. How are ingress and egress to the property to be provided?
III.A.5. How are the following utilities to be provided to the property?
a. Stormwater Drainage /1/k-
b. Sanitary Sewer __ Xi ST�n1w
c. Potable Water
d. Irrigation Water hi�'r7h�U
e. Electricity X11InNe,
f. Telephone Ko j
g. Gas
h. Cable Television rx /S --u
III.A.6. If the project involves the erection of one or more structures, please describe how the structures are
consistent with the criteria in Section 66 -144 of the Town of Gulf Stream Code. (Attach additional
sheet if necessary.)
PART IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Section A is to be completed by all applicants after pre- application conference with Town staff. Answering
"Yes" to any question in Section A requires the completion of additional Sections as indicated.
A. Additional Approvals /Requirements
IV.A.1. Does the project involve land area within fifty feet (50') of the Al (North Ocean Boulevard) right -of-
way? ❑ Yes CO No (If "Yes ", section B of this part must be completed.)
IV.A.2. Does the project involve the demolition of one or more structures? ❑ Yes N(No
(If "Yes ", section C of this part must be completed.)
IV.A.3. Does the project involve the clearing or filling of any portion of an existing vacant lot or more than
fifty percent (50 %) of the landscaped area of a developed lot? ❑ Yes f,'N0
(If "Yes ", section D of this part must be completed.)
IV.A.5. D es the project require approval of a Special Exception?
;'Yes ❑ No (If "Yes ", section E of this part must be completed.)
IV.A.6. Is the prof ct at variance with any regulations contained in the Zoning Code?
❑ Yes XNo (If "Yes ", section G of this part must be completed.)
Application for Development Approval Form ADA.32000
Page 3
- v��cdlll
E. Projects Requiring a Special Exception.
IV.E,1, Is the proposed use a
permitted special exception use? 1(Yes ❑ No Code Section:
IV.E,z. How is the use designed, located and 7
welfare, and morals will be protected? proposed to be operated so that the
Public health, safety,
IV.E,3. Will the use cause subst ntial in'u
be located? 11 Yes o rY to the value of other property in the neighborhood where it is to
Explain. J7 1r 111i C
� 4
'H
1
IS L
How will the use be com Patible Ott
is to be located? with adjoining development and the character of the District here it
0' gFPu1,r'— 60P. P-S-Ma
itJ
—n
IV.E.5. What landscaping P g and screening are provided?
s E LA -WoSco IN6 Lr�s
� PI(LN t bib
IV.E.6. Does the u conform with all applicable regulations governing
located? 9Yes 1:1 No g the District wherein it is to be
Explain.
F. Non - Residential Projects and Residential Projects of Greater than 2 Units
IV.F.1. If common area facilities are to be provided, describe them and how the
i 11� Y are to be maintained.
IV.F,2. If recreation facilities are to be provided, describe them and their Potential acts
properties. enial im P on surrounding
N i A-
IV.F.3. For each of the following, list the number provided and their dimensions,
Loading Spaces:
Standard Parking Spaces:
Small Car Parking Spaces:
Handicapped Parking Spaces:
Driveways /Aisles:
VIA,
Application for Development Approval Form ADA.32000
Page 5
��O ] J Q ��C I I ? " w N �� ( n
��
v v * i
o o p
c - : : O ��
z m A m 1 G 7
2 . 8 r p
A m >