Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
ARPB 02 28 2013 w/backup
CHAIRMAN: VICE CHAIRMAN: BOARD MEMBER: ALTERNATE MEMBER: Scott Morgan Amanda Jones Paul A. Lyons, Jr. Thomas Smith Malcolm Murphy Ann Kasten Aker George Delafield, Jr. REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING BEING HELD BY THE REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2013 AT 8:30 A.M., IN THE TOWN ROAD, GULF STREAM, FLORIDA. AGE:: DA February 20, 2013 ARCHITECTURAL FLORIDA ON HALL, 100 SEA I. Call to Order. II. Roll Call. III. Minutes of the Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of 1-24-13. IV. Additions, withdrawals, deferrals, arrangement of agenda items. V. Announcements. A. Meeting Dates 1. Regular Meeting & Public Hearing a. March 28, 2013 @ 8:30 A.M. b. April 25, 2013 @ 8:30 A.M. c. May 23, 2013 @ 8:30 A.M. d. June 27, 2013 @ 8:30 A.M. e. July 25, 2013 @ 8:30 A.M. f. August 2013 -No Meeting VI. PUBLIC HEARING. A. Applications for Development Approval 1. An application submitted by Bernard and Stephanie Molyneux, owners of the property located at 915 Emerald Row, Gulf Stream, Florida, which is legally described as Lot 64, Place Au Soleil Subdivision, Gulf Stream, Florida a. VARIANCE to allow a roof replacement on an existing Gulf Stream Bermuda style, single family, one story dwelling, of a color and material that do not conform to the provisions of Sections 70-107 and 70-238 of the Gulf Stream Zoning Code. b. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW to permit the installation of a brown, flat cement tile roof, replacing the existing wood shake roof, on an existing Gulf Stream Bermuda style, single family, one story dwelling 2. An application submitted by William Ring, Commerce Group, Inc. as agent for Martin O'Boyle, owner of property located at 23 Hidden Harbour Dr., Gulf Stream, Florida, legally described as Lot 5, Hidden Harbour Estates, Gulf Stream, Florida. a. VARIANCE #1 to allow a net addition 109 square feet to the front entry feature of the existing non- conforming two-story single family dwelling that currently exceeds the maximum permitted floor area ratio by 2,589 square feet. b. VARIANCE #2 to permit the first -story eave height of the proposed entry feature to exceed the maximum AGENDA CONTINUED discouraged height of 12.5 feet by 2.5 feet to the architectural element. C. VARIANCE #3 to permit the second -story eave height of the proposed entry feature to exceed the maximum discouraged height of 23 feet by 2 feet. d. VARIANCE #4 to permit an additional 2 foot encroachment beyond the existing 9 foot 8 inch front setback encroachment. .e. DEMOLITION PERMIT to remove 229 square feet of gross floor area. f. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW to permit an addition for a cumulative increase of 109 square feet to an existing 8,001 square foot, non -conforming, Spanish Mediterranean Revival, two-story single family dwelling. 3. An application submitted by Mark Marsh, Bridges, Marsh & Associates, Inc. as agent for Mr.& Mrs. Robert Julian, owners of property located at 1601 North Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, Florida, legally described in metes and bounds in Government Lot 1, Section 10, Township 46 South, Range 43 East. a. LEVEL 2 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW to permit an addition of 392 square feet to the south east corner of the existing Spanish Mediterranean Revival style single family dwelling, to enclose an existing breezeway on the north side of the dwelling and to install a roof over the existing trellis connection to the existing guest house. 4. An application submitted by Mark Marsh, Bridges, Marsh & Associates, Inc., as agent for Mr. & Mrs. Nelson Grumney, Jr., owners of the property located at 2960 Polo Drive, Gulf Stream, Florida, which is legally described as Lot 21 and part of Lot 20 in Gulf Steam Cove Subdivision. a. SPECIAL EXCEPTION #1 to permit the extension of the non -conforming south wall of the existing structure, that encroaches a maximum of 1 foot into the south side setback, to add a master bedroom of approximately 302 square feet to be located on the first floor. b. SPECIAL EXCEPTION #2 to permit the addition of the proposed 302 square foot master bedroom to extend 20 feet into the 50 foot rear setback. C. DEMOLITION PERMIT to allow small portion of existing garage to be removed in order to realign the 2 car garage. d. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW to permit the addition of a master bedroom, a small addition to the kitchen, a realignment of the 2 car garage and a new front entry, a net increase of 540 square feet on the first floor of an existing partial two story Neo - French Eclectic single family dwelling. VII. Items by Staff. VIII. Items by Board Members. IX. Public. X. Adjournment. AGENDA CONTINUED SHOULD ANY INTERESTED PARTY SEEK TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, SAID PARTY WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE, MAY NEED TO INSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 286.0105, F.S.S. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM, FLORIDA ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 24, 2013 AT 8:30 A.M., IN THE TOWN HALL, 100 SEA ROAD, GULF STREAM, FLORIDA. I. Call to Order 8:35 A.M. II. Roll Call. Present and Participating Absent w/Notice Also Present and Participating Chairman Morgan called the meeting to order at Scott Morgan Tom Smith Paul Lyons Amanda Jones Malcolm Murphy George Delafield Ann Aker William Thrasher Rita Taylor John Randolph Tom Laudani of Seaside Builders Richard Jones of Jones Architects Dave Bodker of Dave Bodker Landscape & Architecture Joe Pike of EnviroDesign George Brewer of Brewer Architecture, Inc. Mr. and Mrs. Ross Jones William Himmelrich Chairman Board Member Board Member Board Member Board Member Alt. Member Alt. Member Town Manager Town Clerk Town Attorney Agent/1275 N. Ocean LLC Architect/1275 N. Ocean LLC Landscape Architect/ 1275 N. Ocean LLC Engineer/1275 N. Ocean LLC Agent/Jones Applicant/450 Banyan 1304 N. Ocean Blvd. III. Minutes of the Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of 12-27-12. Mr. Lyons moved and Mr. Smith seconded to approve the Minutes of the December 27, 2012 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing. There was no discussion. All voted AYE. IV. Additions, withdrawals, deferrals, arrangement of agenda items. There were no changes to the Agenda. V. Announcements. A. Meeting Dates 1. Regular Meeting & Public Hearing a. February 28, 2013 @ 8:30 A.M. b. March 28, 2013 @ 8:30 A.M. c. April 25, 2013 @ 8:30 A.M. d. May 23, 2013 @ 8:30 A.M. e. June 27, 2013 @ 8:30 A.M. f. July 25, 2013 @ 8:30 A.M. Chairman Morgan noted the Meeting Schedule. There were no conflicts with the February meeting date. Mr. Lyons stated that he would not be present for the March meeting. Architectural Review and Planning Board Regular Meeting and Public Hearing - January 24, 2013 Page 2 VI. PUBLIC HEARING. A. Applications for Development Approval Chairman Morgan asked for declarations of Ex -parte communication concerning any of the applications being heard today. Mr. Lyons stated that he met with William Thrasher concerning the condition for approval for 450 Banyan. Chairman Morgan stated that he spoke with Mr. Paul-Hus of 3500 N. Ocean Blvd. who asked for some concerning design matters. Mr. Randolph noted that full Board membership is not present, and he said Code provides that for an application to be approved, a motion requires three-fifths vote or greater in favor to pass. He said there are four Board Members present and three members would have to vote in favor to pass a motion. Further, he said the Code provides applicants the option to either make their presentation to less than a full Board or to come back and make their presentation to a full Board. Tom Laudani of Seaside Builders said his application for 1275 N. Ocean Blvd. is a Level III, the ARPB will make a recommendation only to the Commission, and, he said he would prefer to have his presentation heard at this time. Clerk Taylor said one of the two applications being presented by Mr. Brewer is a Level II and this Board will have final approval on that. Mr. Brewer said he would prefer to have both applications heard today. 1. An application submitted by Seaside Builders LLC, as Agent for 1275 N. Ocean LLC, the owners of property located at 1275 N. Ocean Blvd, Gulf Stream, Florida, which is legally described as Lot 7 and 50' of Lot 6, Revised Plat of Blks. D&E of Palm Beach Shores Estates. a. DEMOLITION PERMIT to remove existing structures. b. LAND CLEARING PERMIT to clear building site and re- arrange/remove existing landscape material. c. NORTH OCEAN BOULEVARD OVERLAY PERMIT to supplement existing landscaping and install rail fence and entrance gate. d. SPECIAL EXCEPTION #1 to allow 300 square feet of covered, unenclosed area that exceeds the maximum floor area permitted. e. SPECIAL EXCEPTION #2 to permit construction of a dune crossover. f. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW to permit construction of 11,566 square foot Bermuda style, single family, partial 2 -story dwelling with guest quarters, attached 3 car garage, outdoor pavilion and swimming pool and dune crossover. Richard Jones of Jones Architects introduced himself. He said this property is located across from Harbor View Estates and they want to be somewhat consistent with the architectural style of the subdivision, but he said this property will be unique in its own right. Mr. Jones said the home will be a partial two-story traditional Bermuda style with an attached 3 -car garage and guest quarters above. There will be a front Architectural Review and Planning Board Regular Meeting and Public Hearing - January 24, 2013 Page 3 motor court and a pool courtyard to the east with an outdoor pavilion overlooking the ocean. Mr. Jones said the property is very secluded and cannot be seen from AlA when driving by, and he said they want to maintain the estate -like feel. He said much of what you see when you enter the property will remain, but with the addition of several upgrades. Further, he said access to the property will not change, there will be entry gates and piers along the street, and the defining feature of the house, common to the Bermuda style, will be the parapets on the front elevation. The structure will feature overhangs with traditional cypress wood out -lookers, wood carriage garage doors, shutters and decorative railings, with landscape walls and gates on the interior of the property. The covered loggia will feature a two-sided fireplace, Bermuda grass will extend to the pool edge to maintain the natural environment, and six large Bending Coconut Palms will also extend to the pool edge. Mr. Jones said the exterior will be white stucco with a white mitered roof and Sherwood Green shutters, rails and overhangs. Chairman Morgan asked if the peak of the roof is the highest point. Mr. Jones said the peak of the roof is 33.7' and the chimney pots are just below 351, a foot higher than the ridge of the house, but he said the pots are a decorative feature and can be dropped in height if made a condition of approval. Mr. Lyons asked why shutters are not shown on all windows. Mr. Jones said shutters will be used on the majority of windows that are in view, and Bahama shutters will be used on some of other windows. Mr. Lyons asked if the front Ficus and Sea Grapes will remain. Dave Bodker, the Landscape Architect, confirmed that, and he said as much of the existing front vegetation as possible will remain. Mr. Lyons asked about the planting of Australian Pines. Mr. Thrasher said the clear zone is yet to be determined, but Australian Pines will be planted where possible. Mr. Smith asked about the wall on the south side which frames the right-of-way. Mr. Jones said it will be a stepped masonry wall, it will follow the same profile as the existing wall on the south side of the right-of-way and it will be painted the same color as the existing wall. Chairman Morgan referred to the streetscape elevation and said the home appears to be connected to a wall on the north side that runs to the property line. Mr. Jones said it is part of the design feature. Chairman Morgan said it may be permissible, but there is a 15' setback. Mr. Jones said it is a garden wall and could be set back a few feet. Mr. Randolph said when it is attached to the structure it is deemed to be a part of the structure. Mr. Jones said it appears seamless, but it is not physically attached and falls under the Code as a perimeter wall. Clerk Taylor said this wall acts as a barrier for the swimming pool and most houses have something to connect to the property line such as a wall or a chain link fence. Mr. Thrasher said there is no real restriction on such a wall and he would not argue against it. Dave Bodker of Dave Bodker Landscape & Architecture introduced himself and addressed the vegetation along N. Ocean Blvd. saying north of the Architectural Review and Planning Board Regular Meeting and Public Hearing - January 24, 2013 Page 4 driveway is a huge existing Strangler Fig and south of the driveway there are a number of existing trees including Tropical Almond, Gumbo Limbo and Sea Grapes with multiple trunks. Day Palms under -planted with Crotens and various annuals will be planted along the radius walls on the west elevation. Mr. Bodker said they propose 5' high columns or piers along AlA with a 4' railing between them, and a railing -type entrance gate that will match the railing between piers. In the interior, Day Palms under -planted with shrubs will flank the motor court, and a series of Sea Grapes separating public access from the home on the south elevation will be filled in with Green Buttonwoods and Sabal Palms. Toward the back they propose Silver Buttonwods with Coconut Palms on either side, and plantings on the north elevation will be similar. Mrs. Jones said she finds the parapets to be very sharp in design, much like pagoda architecture, and she asked if they considered rounding them out. Mr. Jones said they are consistent with the Bermuda style and minimize mass. Mr. Morgan commented that the parapets are a prominent feature. Mr. Thrasher said he likes the uniqueness of the parapets and the Board tries to encourage creativity. He said he likes the look, but they do seem to be prominent. Mr. Jones said they can lower the parapets about one foot and drop the chimneys down about 16 inches. Mr. Laudani agreed to that. Mr. Thrasher asked Mr. Jones to address the front setback required distance and what is being proposed. Mr. Jones said the required front setback is 50' and they are at 78.2' to the garage and roughly 130' to the main structure, which provides a very large setback. William Himmelrich of 1304 N. Ocean Blvd. introduced himself and said he was present at the request of Mr. George Elmore who could not attend and wanted his concerns brought forward. He said the neighbors are aware of the project and they think it is terrific. He said the first concern is for the existing vegetation along AIA and that it not be disrupted, and he said the other concern is with parking along AIA. Mr. Himmelrich said construction can generate a lot of work vehicles and they are hoping contractors will be considerate. In closing, Mr. Himmelrich asked to see a drawing of the south elevation if available.. He was able to view the south elevation. Mr. Laudani said he spoke with Mr. Elmore and addressed the parking concerns. He said there will be no construction parking along AlA and that the staging areas and all construction parking for 1275 N. Ocean Blvd. will be along the hammerhead in the subdivision directly across the street. Mr. Laudani added that he will work with Chief Ward to develop the traffic management plan before this application goes to the Town Commission. Mr. Lyons moved and Mr. Smith seconded to recommend approval of a demolition permit to remove the existing structure. There was no discussion. All voted AYE. Mr. Lyons moved and Mr. Smith seconded to recommend approval of a land clearing permit to clear the building site and re-arrange/remove existing landscape materials. There was no Architectural Review and Planning Board Regular Meeting and Public Hearing - January 24, 2013 Page 5 discussion. All voted AYE. Mr. Lyons moved and Mr. Smith seconded to recommend approval of a North Ocean Boulevard Overlay Permit to supplement existing landscaping and install a rail fence and entrance gate. There was no discussion. All voted AYE. Mr. Lyons moved and Mr. Smith seconded to recommend approval of a Special Exception to allow 300 SF of covered, unenclosed area that exceeds the maximum floor area permitted. There was no discussion. All voted AYE. Mr. Lyons moved and Mr. Smith seconded to recommend approval of a Special Exception to permit construction of a dune crossover. There was no discussion. All voted AYE. Mr. Lyons moved and Mr. Smith seconded to recommend approval of a Level III Architectural/Site Plan based on a finding that the proposed construction of 11,566 SF Bermuda style, single family, partial 1 -story dwelling with guest quarters, attached 3 -car garage, outdoor pavilion and swimming pool and dune crossover meet the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards with the following conditions: 1. The electric service lines shall be buried; 2. Any minor modifications in the landscape plan shall be submitted to the Town Manager for review and approval and any major modifications shall be brought back to the ARPB for review and approval, prior to commencement of landscaping; 3. Wall and/or fences will be measured from the lowest abutting grade with a maximum height of 8' including any lighting fixtures that may be attached; 4. All chain link fencing will be screened from neighbor's view; 5. The landscape plan will protect existing Australian pine trees and provide a 13' clear zone from white travel line where possible allowing for the planting by the Town of two to ten Australian pine trees; 6. The two chimney heights will each be lowered by 16"; and 7. A construction parking plan will be coordinated with the Town of Gulf Stream and the Gulf Stream Police Department. There was no discussion. All voted AYE. 2. An application submitted by George Brewer as agent for Ross and Katherine Jones, owners of property located at 450 Banyan Road, Gulf Stream, Florida, legally described as Lot 4, Blk. 1, Plat No. 1 Polo Fields Subdivision, Gulf Stream, Florida. a. DEMOLITION PERMIT to completely remove the existing second story of existing structure. b. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW to permit the addition of a bedroom wing and covered loggia on the south east corner and an addition to existing bedroom on the south west corner, along with a new entry feature, a total of 1,431 square feet, to the existing Bermuda style single family dwelling and new landscaping and driveway. George Brewer of Brewer Architecture, Inc., Agent for Mr. and Mrs. Jones, introduced himself and described the existing home, located on the corner of Banyan and Polo, as a classic Florida Ranch. He said the goal is to beautify the home by removing the wood -framed second story addition, change it to a Bermuda style and bring it to Code. Mr. Brewer Architectural Review and Planning Board Regular Meeting and Public Hearing - January 24, 2013 Page 6 said the home has never been renovated, except for an outdoor porch which was enclosed and air-conditioned. They will improve the interior, add a new wing to the house, create a backyard courtyard and outdoor loggia, replace the landscaping, modify the pool deck and add a spa. They will extend the existing master bedroom to add a bathroom, remove all aluminum awnings, replace all windows and add shutters and they will redo the driveway, replacing asphalt with pavers. There will be a new entry feature; crown molding along the soffits and they will add a chimney for the new interior fireplace. Mr. Brewer said the exterior will be painted Creme Fleece, the shutters will be a grayish blue and the trim and roof will be a flat white. Mr. Lyons asked about the condition of approval. Mr. Thrasher said the finished floor elevation is 6.3' and the flood elevation required in that zone is 71. He said the existing home is below the flood elevation and to maintain our CSR Rating and Certification FEMA requires that the Town have the applicant/owner go through an analysis evaluation to prove, state and certify that the additions and changes are not greater than 50% of the value of the structure. He said the Town is required to ask for this certification and to retain in their records. The owner retained an appraiser and the Town has provided forms to be completed. Mrs. Ross stated that she is not exactly sure of the colors and they may change. Mr. Thrasher said any changes in color must be approved by the Town Manager. Mr. Lyons moved and Mr. Smith seconded to recommend approval of a Demolition Permit to remove the entire second story. There was no discussion. All voted AYE. Mr. Lyons moved and Mr. Smith seconded to recommend approval of a Level III Architectural/Site Plan based on a finding that the proposed addition of a bedroom wing and covered loggia on the south east corner and an addition to existing bedroom on the south west corner, along with a new entry feature, a total of 1,431 SF, to the existing Bermuda style single family dwelling and new landscaping and driveway meet the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards with the following condition: (1) Prior to permitting, applicant's agent shall demonstrate and verify that the proposed additions and improvements do not exceed 50% of the market value of the structures before "start of construction". There was no discussion. All voted AYE. 3. An application submitted by George Brewer as agent for Richard Paul-Hus, owner of the property located at 3500 North Ocean Boulevard, Gulf Stream, Florida, which is legally described as Part of Lot 55, lying west of westerly right-of-way line of State Road A -1-A, plus the east 1i of Palm Way, lying west of and adjacent to said Lot, Gulf Stream Properties No. 2, as in Plat Book 18, Page 42, Public Records of Palm Beach County Florida. a. NORTH OCEAN BLVD. OVERLAY PERMIT to allow the reconfiguration of existing driveway, construction of a fireplace and enhanced landscaping within the North Ocean Blvd. Corridor. Architectural Review and Planning Board Regular Meeting and Public Hearing - January 24, 2013 Page 7 b. LEVEL, 2 ARCHITECTURAL\SITE PLAN REVIEW to permit an addition of 32 square feet and renovation of an existing partial two story, single family dwelling of Monterey Vernacular style and the addition of an outside fireplace, reconfiguration of existing driveway and enhancement of existing landscaping. Mr. Brewer, Architect and Agent for Mr. Paul-Hus, said a large family with four children and one on the way will be moving into this very modest Monterey style home. He said the modifications to this home are mostly interior and he summarized the proposed improvements, as follows: There are two bedrooms on the 2nd floor, one of which will be divided into two bedrooms, the kitchen will be relocated, they will create an outdoor environment, a new front courtyard entry, a new side entry for the children and the laundry room will be moved to the garage. The exterior of the ground level is stucco, the second story is board and batting with a tile roof and they will add a small chimney. All windows will be single -hung hurricane impact with shutters, there will be a new garage door and the second floor will be re -strapped to bring it up to Code. Mr. Brewer said the existing driveway entrance from AlA is a disaster and very difficult to maneuver in and out. He said the driveway will be reconfigured to allow safe exit onto AlA. Mr. Smith referred to the additional right-of-way piece and asked if it could be used for turning. Mr. Thrasher said the application was examined based on the property they own and it was concluded that the additional right-of-way was not on their property and cannot be used. Mr. Brewer said they also wanted to install a gate for security for the children, but he said he was told that gates are not permitted in the central Core. Mr. Thrasher said the plan showed a gate and he asked that it be removed. He said gates in the Core area are prohibited and he provided the Agent with the option of the owner applying for a variance, which would be a Level III, where the Board would be the recommending body and the final decision would rest with the Commission. Mr. Thrasher referred to Page 70-78 of the Code, Section 70-187(5), Gulf Stream Core, where it talks about entrance gates and provides that all gates are prohibited. Mr. Brewer said he heard it is rare for the Commission to grant a variance. Mr. Randolph said variances have been granted; however, he said the criteria in the Code are strict. You must show hardships that are unique to the property and not common to other area properties. You must apply so that surrounding neighbors will be noticed, and he said you should not be discouraged to apply. Mr. Smith said the owner should consider applying for a variance to install a gate for the security of the children. Chairman Morgan asked if the second right-of-way was unique to this property. Mr. Thrasher said he was not sure what that right-of-way piece is and cannot answer the question. Mrs. Jones asked the height of the wall surrounding the pool area, which includes the fireplace. Mr. Brewer said it is an existing wall with a picket fence detail along the top, it is 4' to 4.5' high and it will not be altered. He said there is a courtyard type Architectural Review and Planning Board Regular Meeting and Public Hearing - January 24, 2013 Page 8 entrance with a gate and they will correct that space to provide a sense of direction. Mr. Lyons asked about the regulations for outdoor showers. Mr. Thrasher said they are not prohibited, but he said they must be attached to the wall with no overhang, it must be greater than 2.5' and it cannot encroach on the FAR. Mr. Lyons moved and Mr. Smith seconded to approve a North Ocean Boulevard Overlay Permit based on a finding that the proposed reconfiguration of an existing driveway, construction of a fireplace and enhanced landscaping within the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay zone meet the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards. There was no discussion. All voted AYE. Mr. Lyons moved and Mr. Smith seconded to approve a Level II Architectural/Site Plan based on a finding that the proposed addition of 32 SF and renovation of an existing partial two-story, single family dwelling of Monterey Vernacular style, the addition of an outside fireplace and the reconfiguration of an existing driveway that includes enhancement of existing landscape, meet the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards. There was no discussion. All voted AYE. VII. Items by Staff. There were no items by Staff. VIII. Items by Board Members. Mr. Smith asked about items coming up on the February Agenda. Clerk Taylor said there are three applications for February, and Mr. Thrasher said there is a variance request on one application. Clerk Taylor said Mark Marsh brought in two applications, one of which is for a remodel of Mrs. Jones' former home and the other is an application for 1601 N. Ocean, which includes two small additions and the conversion of a trellised walkway to a roof -covered walkway. She said the variance request is by Mr. Molyneux in Place Au Soleil for a re -roof replacing cedar shake with a flat cement tile, but he does not want to use white tile and the color is the issue. Mr. Smith noted that Seaside Builders should work with the Police Department with regard to traffic management and parking for the 1275 N. Ocean project. Mr. Thrasher said the construction traffic for this project should not be an issue due to their easy access to the hammerhead in the subdivision across the street. IX. Public. There were no items by the Public X. Adjournment. Being no further business to come before the Board, Chairman Morgan adjourned the meeting at 9:55 A.M. Gail C. Abbale Administrative Assistant TOWN OF GULF STREAM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING REPORT Application #: 013 -4 Address: 915 Emerald Row Proposed Improvement: Approvals Requested: Owner: Bernard & Stephanie Molyneux Agent: Self Roof Material Variance: To allow a roof replacement on an existing Gulf Stream Bermuda style, single family, one story dwelling, of a color and material that do not conform to the provisions of Sections 70 -107 and 70 -238 of the Gulf Stream Zoning Code Level III Architectural /Site Plan: To permit the installation of a brown, flat cement tile roof, replacing the existing wood shake roof, on an existing Gulf Stream Bermuda style, single family, one story dwelling. Architectural Style: G/S Bermuda Neighborhood: Mixed Issues Considered During Review: Section 66 -154 Standards (For Granting Variances) see page CD66:46 and CD66:47 There are eight (8) standards to be reviewed in granting a variance. All eight standards must be met in order to allow a variance. For example, if seven (7) standards are met and only one was not met, the variance should be denied. Section 70 -107 Additions and rehabiliations, and replacement of existing features. (e) Prohibited. Use of prohibited design elements not present on the existing structure. Section 70 -238 Roofs. (d) Prohibited. Tiles other than zvhite flat untextured tiles or gray slate tiles. NOTE. The owner is proposing an entire re- roofing with a brown /tan concrete tile material that is prohibited. The applicant has provided certification that the roof can accommodate the additional loads imposed on by replacing the existing shingles with concrete tile. Recommendation: Motion to recommend denial of a variance based on a finding that the proposed brown /tan concrete roof material is prohibited by Gulf Stream Zoning Code Sections 70 -107 and 70 -238. Additionally, none of the required eight (8) standards for granting a variance have been met as defined in Section 66 -154. Motion to recommend denial of Level III Architectural/ Site Plan based on the finding that the proposed brown /tan concrete roof material is prohibited by Gulf Stream Zoning Code Sections 70 -107 and 70 -238, and none of the required eight (8) standards for granting a variance have been met as defined in Section 66 -154. Architectural'Review and Planning Board ARPB File #013 -04 ARPB February 28, 2013 TC March 15, 2013 ARPB Date: February 28, 2013 Action: Variance: Recommended denial for above reasons. (5 -0) Level III Architectural/ Site Plan: Recommend denial for above reasons. (5 -0) TC Date: March 15, 2013 Action: Page 2 Variance: Installation of Brown tile was denied but Grey slate like tile was approved (5 -0) Level III Architectural/ Site Plan: Approved with gray slate like tile. (5 -0) NOTE: Several days after this hearing, Mr. Molyneux advised staff that he would be using the white thru and thru, 9" tiles that conform to the Code provisions. Town of Gulf Stream TOWN OF GULF STREAM ► RECEIVED,, JAN 112013 J rOwn of Gulfslream Fl, APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL This form is to be used for all development review applications to be heard by the Town of Gulf Stream Architectural Review and Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, and /or Town Commission. To complete the form properly, please review the accompanying Town of Gulf Stream Instruction Manual for Application for Development Review Form. Failure to complete this form properly will delay its consideration. ARPB File To be completed by all applicants. PART II. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Project Information I.A.I I. Project/Owner Name: e i Q i 6W 5 fG 6art t c /V f 0 I ll eK I.A.2. Project Address: k5 irmefa l d ROW I.A.3. Project Property Legal Description: T lace A4 Sp l..ei I L D _r y U I.A.4. Project Description (describe in detail, including # of stories, etc.)_ 12x01 QC i r04 6 le- I.A.5. Square Footage of New Structure or Addition: /t%//4 Architectural Style: "R'cj Y M 1.A.6. Check all that apply: &KArchitectural /Site Plan Review ❑ Land Clearing ❑ North Ocean Boulevard Overlay (complete section B) ❑ Demolition of Structures ❑ Non - residential uses Variance (complete section G) ❑ Special Exception (complete section E) 1.A.7. (a) Proposed F.F.E.: Type of Foundation: B. Owner Information I.B.1. Owner Address: q/5 I) i,e Atd ?o tAi I.B.2. Owner Phone Number: �l Q - 0 o 7 Fax: 56 I.B.3. Owner Signature: 1z ,�� _ �3 — C. Agent Information I.C.1. Agent Name and Firm Name: I.C.2. Agent Address: I.C.3. Agent Phone Number: (o) cell Fax 1C.4. Agent Signature: Official Use Only Pre -App Date: ARPB Date: App Date: Recommendation: Com Date: TC Date: Decision: r -7 $2, 614" % 2.2 - Application for Development Approval Form ADA.2000 revised 6/13/00 Page 2 Town of Gulf Stream PART III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION To be completed by all applicants after pre- application conference with Town Staff. Please be concise but brief. Attach additional sheets only when necessary and be sure to include the appropriate and complete question number for each response. A. Project Description and Justification III.A.1. In what zoning district is the project site located? S III.A.2. Is the project compatible with the intent of the zoning district? )V"7es ❑ No Explain. III.A.3. Is the project consistent with the Future Land Use Map and goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan? �s ❑ No Explain. "' III.A.4. How are ingress and egress to the property to be provided? III.A.5. How are the following utilities to be provided to the property? a. Stormwater Drainage b. Sanitary Sewer c. Potable Water d. Irrigation Water e. Electricity f. Telephone g. Gas h. Cable Television - E ; 51& n,s- 54rk c&✓ -(, III.A.6. If the project involves the erection of one or more structures, please describe how the structures are consistent with the criteria in Section 66 -144 of the Town of Gulf Stream Code. (Attach additional sheet if necessary.) PART IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Section A is to be completed by all applicants after pre- application conference with Town staff. Answering "Yes" to any question in Section A requires the completion of additional Sections as indicated. A. Additional Approvals /Requirements IV.A.1. Does the project involve land area within fifty feet (50') of the A1A (North Ocean Boulevard) right -of- way? ❑ Yes kq—o (If "Yes ", section B of this part must be completed.) IV.A.2. Does the project involve the demolition of one or more structures? ❑ Yes to (If "Yes ", section C of this part must be completed.) IV.A.3. Does the project involve the clearing or filling of any portion of an existing vacant lot or more than fifty percent (50 %) of the landscaped area of a developed lot? ❑ Yes P!rNo (If "Yes ", section D of this part must be completed.) IV.A.5. Does the pr ject require approval of a Special Exception? ❑ Yes VNo (If "Yes ", section E of this part must be completed.) IV.A.6. I_ sAhe project at variance with any regulations contained in the Zoning Code? AYes ❑ No (If "Yes ", section G of this part must be completed.) Application for Development Approval Form ADA.32000 Page 3 Town'of Gulf Stream G. Projects Requiring a Variance (code Section 66 -150 through 157) IV.G.1. From what specific Zoning Code regulation is a variance requested? 10 — /U 7 IV.G.2. What does the Zoning Code require for this specific site? %hJhP /CyG/ posy j ble' ris�'n5 pi�s�oura t �a✓ [�►� 6;kel desily Y7 - C/f.Yre/ Shot, 1W rem Ole d % % {P IV.G.3. What is proposed? t (elatP/yfelr% r IV.G.4. What is the total variance req ested? k refu /cd W Uc lr IV.G.5. The following 8 mandatory variance additional sheet if necessary.) /. , a E eY/ wood slt o lCP roo, u4 iA dA /r. �s+ 7o n o� be C la u 14>- kAi k 0/11514/e gs from Section 66 -154, must b be /(f (Attach (1) What specific conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district? -t{ ear(',,, '15 roof- h'/6 is 4 dat-k woad SAlAke rood Gdhl'c� was 1� s. aw� w a �b l� <� d OF eY,s h" ?? rO0 wA e o rP (G f, 179 �, !P (2) Did the special condition and circumstances result trom the act ons of the applicant? Yes (3) Will granting the variance confer upon the applicant any special privilege that is de ni by the Zoning Code to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? Yes o Explain: %1.( PralpOSeG( roof (4) ;f has exrsk-d for 'Me( P?O VearS. How would a literal interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the same terms of the ordinance and work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant? Gi h ram. D �'�e -e%ro` �;on (5) Is the Variance requese minimum variance that makes possible the reasonable use of the land building or structure? es No / Explain: %a/l� it y , S 1!G /i G R ele j tVlll Su it ow? �rOpe /�v OuAa, -S �- CCGcuIe A�e Sm-�-e � a. (r>> 11'��a/ `f'�.l -SGtm P Gi S %� /5 V VV (6) Will granting the variance permit any prohibited use to be established or re- established: Yes No (7) Is the requested variance consistent wn goals, policies, and objectives of the future Land Use Map of the adopted Comprehensive Plan? No (8) Will the variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning (�-i7jNance and not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Ye No Explain: V6j rd(A n Y !N/ �/ no 7 /J P �C /n'i�it % //I �'n c✓ lNQy- Ptw0s�� �Do� �< GtJi� ✓� Sirn�/V QS fix; s g /-p �-� �i le a �/�Prf, S Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 6 February 2002 11 ui cult Stream H. Projects Requiring Rezoning IV-H.1. What is the Future Land Use designation of the project site? IV.H.2. If the project involves a rezoning, Comprehensive Plan text change, o Zoning Code text change, justification for the request, y mbination thereof, Future Land Use Map change, Please describe the need and PART V. OPTIONAL INFORMATION This entire Part is optional for all applicants, q additional relevant information regarding the project that was not covered elsewhere Applicants are encouraged, but not required, to provide any the other materials submitted with the application. on this form or on any of t� it r b r, inn � � L 004 le I j� Lv'�z s ' -_ c54-M c 7 cu , — 4k, Application for Development Approval Form ADA.2000 revised 6 /0 /00 w a-S r .11L- 6t-0 "� 4 ro D7` 4— '16 KJ W 16 r -awn. /cl—� Page 7 Town of Gulf Stream B. Projects Requiring North Ocean Boulevard Overlay Permit IV.B.1. What significant landscape features or architectural features are to be disturbed or added and to what extent? IV.6.2. Describe the need and justification for the disturbance /addition: IV.B.3. Will the disturbance /addition destroy or seriously impair visual relationships among buildings, landscape features and open space, or introduce incompatible landscape features or plant material that destroys or impairs significant views or vistas within the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District? Yes No Explain: IV.B.4. How is the design consistent with the Al Landscape Enhancement Project? IV.B.5. What mitigation is proposed so that the disturbance /addition has the least impact possible to the visual and aesthetic quality of the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: C. Projects Requiring a Demolition Permit IV.C.1. When are the existing structures to be demolished? IV.C.2. When are the proposed structures to be constructed? IV.C.3. What is the landmark status of the structures to be demolished? D. Projects Requiring a Land Clearing Permit IV.D.1. Describe those vegetative materials of 8 inches in diameter and greater to be North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: IV.D.2. Describe the need and justification for the removal /relocation: IV.D.3. How is the removal from the project site of vegetation to be mitigated: IV.D.4. How are the remaining and relocated vegetative materials to be protected and preserved during the land clearing and constriction activities and thereafter? IV.D.5. What replacement materials are proposed? Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 4 February 2002 ��+ u c a l l l E " P r o j e c t s R e q u i r i n g a S p e c i a l E x c e p t i o n . I V . E , 1 , I s t h e p r o p o s e d u s e a p e r m i t t e d s p e c i a l e x c e p t i o n u s e ? 0 Y e s Q' N o C o d e S e c t i o n : I V . E , 2 . H o w i s t h e u s e d e s i g n e d , l o c a t e d a n d p r o p o s e d t o b e o w e l f a r e , a n d m o r a l s w i l l b e p r o t e c t e d ? A e r a t e d s o t h a t t h e p u b l i c h e a l t h , s a f e t y , I V . E . 3 , W i l l t h e u s e c a u s e s u b s t a n t i a l i n j u r y b e l o c a t e d ? p Y e s Q' N o t r Y t o t h e v a l u e o f o t h e r P r o p e r t y i n t h e n e i g h b o r h o o d w h e r e i t i s t o E x p l a i n . M E - 4 . H o y , w i l l t h e u s e b e c o m p a t i b l e w i t h a d j o i n i n g d e v e l o p m e n t I i s t o b e l o c a t e d ? p m e n t a n d t h e c h a r a c t e r o f t h e D i s t r i c t w h e r e ' t I V . E . 5 . W h a t l a n d s c a p i n g a n d s c r e e n i n g a r e p r o v i d e d ? I V . E . 6 . D o e s t h e u s e c o n f o r m w i t h a l l a p p l i c a b l e r e g u l a t i o n s g o v e r n i n g t h e D i s t r i c t w h e r e i n i t i s t o b e E x p l a i n . F . N o n - R e s i d e n t i a l P r o j e c t s a n d R e s i d e n t i a l P r o j e c t s o f G r e a t e r t h a n 2 U n i t s W . F . I . I f c o m m o n a r e a f a c i l i t i e s a r e t o b e p r o v i d e d , d e s c r i b e t h e m a n d h o w t h e y a r e t o b e m a i n t a i n e d . I V Y - 2 . I f r e c r e a t i o n f a c i l i t i e s a r e t o b e p r o v i d e d , d e s c r i b e t h e m a n d t h e i r p o t e n t i a l i m p a c t s P r o p e r t i e s . o n s u r r o u n d i n g I V . F . 3 . F o r e a c h o f t h e f o l l o w i n g , l i s t t h e n u m b e r p r o v i d e d a n d t h e i r d i m e n s i o n s . L o a d i n g S p a c e s : S t a n d a r d P a r k i n g S p a c e s : S m a l l C a r P a r k i n g S p a c e s : H a n d i c a p p e d P a r k i n g S p a c e s : D r i v e w a y s / A i s l e s : A p p l i c a t i o n f o r D e v e l o p m e n t A p p r o v a l F o r m A D A . 3 2 0 0 0 P a g e 5 February, 23, 2013 Rita L. Taylor, Town Clerk Town of Gulf Stream 100 Sea Road Gulf Stream, Florida 33483 ► RECEIVED q FEB 2 6 2013 Town of Gulfstream, FL Re: Public Hearings on Thursday, February 28, 2013 at 8:30am and Friday, March 15, 2013 at 11:00am at which the following will be considered: Application submitted by Bernard and Stephanie Molyneux, owners of the property located at 915 Emerald Row, Gulf Stream, Florida, which is legaly described as Lot 64, Place Au Soleil Subdivision, Gulf Stream, Florida for the following: Variance to allow a roof replacement on an existing Gulf Stream Bermuda style, one story dwelling, of a color and material that do not conform to the provisions of Sections 70 -107 and 70 -238 of the Gulf Stream Zoning Code. Level 3 Architectural /site plan review to permit the installation of a brown, flat cement tile roof, replacing the existing wood shake roof, on an existing Gulf Stream Bermuda style, single family, one story dwelling. Dear Ms. Taylor, Unfortunately, We are unable to attend either of the hearings cited above, but wish to advise all parties concerned that, as neighbors (directly across the street at 2700 Place An Soleil), we have no objections to the granting of the above requested proposals by Bernard and Stephanie Molyneux, and therefor encourage the appropriate boards to approve the requests. We believe their proposals will enhance and further beautify our lovely neighborhood. Cordially, Thomas Kubricky and Terri Kubricky, owners 2700 Place Au Soleil Gulf Stream, Florida c: hand delivered to Bernard and Stephanie Molyneux LUIS F ORTEGA, PE Civil/Structural Engineer November 28, 2012 Royal Palm Roofing Palm Bch County, Florida Re: STRUCTURAL INVESTIGATION OF EXISTING ROOF SYSTEM TO REPLACE SHINGLES WITH TILES Single Family Home 91' Eftierald Row Delray Bch, Florida Gentlemen, An inspection was conducted on November 26, 2012 per your request to verify the actual structural condition of the existing roof at above referenced residence, and its adequacy to accommodate the additional loads imposed on by replacing the existing shingles with tiles. By visual observation and structural analysis it was verified that the existing roof system including the wood deck, the trusses and their metal plates, the rafters and the ridge beams, is in good condition and it is adequate to receive the additional loaUS of the new tiles. However, the roof to wall connection of the rafters could not be verified at the time of this inspection. Therefore, this has to be verified before the work, and it needs to be done with metal connectors fastened to the tie beam. Additionally, the weight of the new tiles shall not exceed 12 PSF to be verified per the NOA of the tile manufacturer. If you have any questions or concerns in regards to the above matter, please do not hesitate to contact our at 194An VffiVV J -7 �on LTUo 4. Thank, YOU.. Ti Li Reg. 61145 1 OF 1 116 HIDDEN CT ROAD, HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA 33023 TEL: 954.937.2484 FAX: 954.962.1801 I&I'l . I jooH ;oargnS jo sydeiGo ;o Mot! plBaaLu3 5t 6 tktj ti� N�c lop 03 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF CURRIE SOWARDS AGUILA ARCHITECTS INC. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. ANY POSSESSION, REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USE OF THIS DOCUMENT, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF CURRIE SOWARDS AGUILA ARCHITECTS INC., IS PROHIBITED. 1/1$/2013 2:59.011 PM � r 1 s, 0) °t --I �m 4 -u Z pT Zoos - - - - -� - II � I I I I R TRJG I MUILDM I el:TaACc 47 I I I I I � I \ I ra I I I l �g I � I I z I i II I I fib' I \ \\ I n I I \ I I I �I II v I \ � I \ � I I � I \ � I \ I \ \ P v I I Ci ©� y 54 D iP T N N >� 1V)-I O y pZ i n z m Z o M CD ° C m v o �-- ®. 1 s, 0) °t --I �m 4 -u Z pT Zoos - - - - -� - II � I I I I R TRJG I MUILDM I el:TaACc 47 I I I I I � I \ I ra I I I l �g I � I I z I i II I I fib' I \ \\ I n I I \ I I I �I II v I \ � I \ � I I � I \ � I \ I \ \ P v I I \ 23 DRAiNA;E EASEMENT (PLAT BOOK I'S, PAGES I73 & 1 4) \ I I I u II- , l z rn W o ©� y 54 D iP T N N >� 1V)-I O y pZ g" a n z m n o M CD ° C m v o �-- ®. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SET 1 -15 -2013 F D m < �g°mQF gr ° €01- m a I o v mz�"QOmyym p o- z <fifiii � <ym o °o��1 W z��g$g��; =� O np yyob Y�"�mg ° °zz�o D r ymo<m o A 9 Z°U O � O p m mm °z \ 23 DRAiNA;E EASEMENT (PLAT BOOK I'S, PAGES I73 & 1 4) \ I I I u II- , l z rn W o y 54 D iP T N N 1V)-I O y pZ m.°, m o 1 n D O C7 g" a rn �x T Z o 3 y m T e m C iE OO o >X rn Ili u1 D m < V. m 3 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF CURRIE SOWARDS AGUILA ARCHITECTS INC. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. ANY POSSESSION, REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USE OF THIS DOCUMENT. WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF CURRIE SOWARDS AGUILA ARCHITECTS INC., IS PROHIBITED. 1/15/2013 1:51:00 PM � T n F" O O X Z O v m z n M rn 3 w 0 Ar DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SET 1 -15 -2013 f N m � m r I� m �t�iO�ppZp 22p2n ~Am —I H p = c = q 'o am >p> yss ApA p z. my npn Z - ~-pio mD mayyw�Aym�SmZD N v W m vi >2> F O om�on. ' ' C o D '""' n p m C7 o9rm °ccmo��imz� �� $ DF „o .0 1.. A2C$ O 3 tm 0O p - 9 A r3x AZzTZti �jO oS m p�m pmx -1S OyN OZm O Zn Li W m ;a O o �� z moo m p _ 3x� "« �> D °ZO —I H p = c = q FFIT ��i -m gn z T m m Z i o v N = U/ C , .., s a �. o p g 3n m an op m om�on. ' ' C o D '""' $ Dp m m n Ln 3 THIS DOCUMENT 15 THE PROPERTY OF CURRIE SOWARDS AGUILA ARCHITECTS INC. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. ANY POSSESSION, REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USE OF THIS DOCUMENT, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF CURRIE SOWARDS AGUILA ARCHITECTS INC., IS PROHIBITED. 1/1 /2013 2123:37 PM i � N m m z 0 m x z G) I O �W rn;a0A = Z m �o C> Z n N c m r' N < s m zp D n 50 --1 rn r- o $ °_oa fll ~ � � A DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SET 1- 15 -201y3 41Y9����imiyz Xi Dz O y0 mq °�x�mm O °a Z i in 4rx54� z. N ' z0 $�oo��$ ��m a 011 a 0 �0 o TI z Z �W rn;a0A = Z m �o - ^ 3 x r u g N �Ln O" �o A °. Imo � 70 (n 2 _ O �z T m rn^ 3z H� C D C muR° zp D n 50 --1 rn o $ °_oa fll ~ � � ;Dp m < 6 m THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF CURRIE SOWARDS AGURA ARCHITECTS INC. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. ANY POSSESSION, REPROOUCNON OR OTHER USE OF THIS DOCUMENT, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF°.CURRIE SOWARDS AGUIIA ARCHITECTS INC., IS PROHIBITED. e L- ..I X51 I( iu ml IN pAc., IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII OR L -1� IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII C� C■0 Illlllllltl IIIIIIIIIIII 0 n� u X Z m 9 m r D Z X Z d � m D m r D O z ®® y C71 m CD N ° m =3 w v DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SET 1/15/2013 F H2 D i [OO m D rJ N; o W i N� O ay 2 N8 u O O G) o O N o€ 2HIKUH N b ion P° p 2 D ¢'� X i/i -n m g I»> z rTTT D A D T%� i. fy mo zzz N m ~�r�X W m v IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII OR L -1� IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII C� C■0 Illlllllltl IIIIIIIIIIII 0 n� u X Z m 9 m r D Z X Z d � m D m r D O z ®® y C71 m CD N ° m =3 w v DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SET 1/15/2013 F H2 D i [OO m D rJ N; o W i N� O ay 2 N8 u O O G) o O N o€ 2HIKUH N b z m e ZO Ogg$ P° p 2 D ¢'� X i/i -n m g N N l i �? C) 0(') z rTTT D A D T%� i. fy mo zzz N m ~�r�X W m v o n D G (11 THIS. DOCUMENT IS THE PROP ERN OF CURRIE SOWARDS AGUILA ARCHITECTS INC. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. ANY POSSESSION, REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USE OF THIS DOCUMENT. WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF CURRIE SOWARDS AGUILA ARCHITECTS INC., IS PROHIBITED, 1/15/2013 11:52:45 AM • , ♦ - I ol+' �cn O C § 2 m r 1 O z aZ I I I a I o N O R m m g 0 O z I I I I I I 1 I I ala °, z m F-► m m 6 0 o �v C �z (D ° m _m w C1 � T T v O z1 ^ l X10 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SET 1 -15 -2013 i Nm ! m ry ^vr�io p zvivgpy ;- cw D b e N m 0 f DAS Om4AOx y pmm _ rr 2 Ap a pm m 000mm-a°I(p]2o< ~y�mD i 0 O � O p i�ampOp- lmmiap� m � ;o I1 W p W p m m�g8��mg��OOOy 9 3= oI�A�ZV_Zm yA a O C)p z zymDCpio °1°(IZ ZLp� O r03 ➢i pZ GTmm� = -paom 0 N b�nz. O�mi AA y o0 22 Tom~ AZTH`.11 p a� Dp 'my >m mOm ° m m mm °z u o W 6D cn 4m r m D O z 1 s n �O § I m r m D O z r 7 r' x ' Tzm m n �rn c m 3�$4 1G) 1, _ mm ao D In > O In 0 rp C z m. m X rn�Orn 3 o GJ m V 1 s n �O § I m r m D O z r 7 r' x ' Tzm m n �rn c m 3�$4 D _ mm O D In > O In rp C q ' o m. m X rn�Orn 3 3 a ; I I I s A I I y aC I Ir I LOT 6 � Np/,y7Vp'E 1e7 a � y ~ ga c 1 ti 4_ Y �m \\ DNAINABE EASEMENT I , I GLA, BMT PArW) �T I R! N pi 1 \ PRVA IFAOID AN]VILIY -- (PLAT IAjL m) 1 PA VEB L OI T �3 L O T 2 L 0 T 1 HIDDEN HARBOUR PLAT TWO —I ( L A T BOOK 115 = PAGES 17 & 174) Q �s N ' P) x � �o Rig 5 Z� g g I r . C- 4'1 2 M m 'CD I� ° w m v i Q �s N ' P) x � �o Rig 5 Z� g g He a ° bx far a° O y °m LL Ax i �I i m cagAavr p[Arawr � Paas os r rx)11I N q p YGYGVG p O� C. cs 0 I r y 4'1 2 4 I� I� I He a ° bx far a° O y °m LL Ax i �I i m cagAavr p[Arawr � Paas os r rx)11I N q p YGYGVG p O� C. cs 0 II r O I I r y 4'1 2 1 I� I� I iJ I �I w� D =o �a I=o , 2 ` I I I r n1 I Ov I I I I II r O I 4'1 2 1 TOWN OF GULF STREAM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING REPORT February 28, 2013 Application #: 013 -05 Owner: Martin O'Boyle Address: 23 Hidden Harbour Dr. Agent: Bill Ring, Commerce Group, Inc. Proposed Improvement: Addition with alterations to an existing Spanish Mediterranean Revival single family dwelling totaling 109 SF. Approvals Requested Variance (1) : To allow a net addition of 109 SF to the front entry feature of the existing non - conforming two -story single family dwelling that currently exceeds the maximum permitted floor area ratio by 2,589 SF. Variance (2): To permit the first -story eave height of the proposed entry feature to exceed the maximum discouraged height of 12.5 feet by 2.5 feet to the architectural element. Variance (3): To permit the second -story eave height of the proposed entry feature to exceed the maximum discouraged height of 23 feet by 2 feet. Variance (4): Demolition: Level III Architectural /Site Plan Proposed Floor Area: 8,110 SF Zoning District: N/S Background: To permit an additional 2 foot encroachment beyond the existing 9 foot 8 inch front setback encroachment. To remove 229 SF of gross floor area. To permit an addition of a cumulative increase of 109 SF to an existing 8,001 SF, non - conforming, Spanish Mediterranean Revival, two -story single family dwelling. Allowable: 5,521 SF At the request of the Town, Mr. Marty Minor of Urban Design Kilday Studios was asked to evaluate and provide his findings of the proposed application. That report is provided as backup to the staff's report. Both Mr. Minor and staff are in agreement and consistent with their findings and that there are four variance created by the proposed application. Issues Considered During Review: Division 3. Variances Section 70 -71 Floor area ratios. Section 70 -74 Setbacks. Architectural Review and Planning Board ARPB File #013 -05 ARPB Thursday February 28, 2013; TC March 15, 2013 Page 2 Section 70 -75 Special exception setbacks. Section 70 -77. First floor elevation. Section 70 -100. Roof and eave heights. Section 70 -101. Windows. Recommendations Motion to Recommend Denial of a variance to allow a net addition of 109 SF to the front entry feature of the existing non - conforming two -story single family dwelling that currently exceeds the maximum permitted floor area ratio by 2,589 SF based on the finding that not all of the required eight (8) standards for granting a variance have been met. Motion to Recommend Denial of a variance to permit the first -story eave height of the proposed entry feature to exceed the maximum discouraged height of 12.5 feet by 2.5 feet to the architectural element based on the finding that not all of the required eight (8) standards for granting a variance have been met. Motion to Recommend Denial of a variance to permit the second -story eave height of the proposed entry feature to exceed the maximum discouraged height of 23 feet by 2 feet of the architectural element based on the finding that not all of the required eight (8) standards for granting a variance have been met. Motion to Recommend Denial of a variance to permit an additional 2 foot encroachment beyond the existing 9 foot 8 inch front setback encroachment based on the finding that not all of the required eight (8) standards for granting a variance have been met. Motion to Recommend Denial to remove 229 SF of gross floor area as the proposed alterations to not meet the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards. Motion to Recommend Denial Level III Architectural /Site Plan to permit a cumulative increase of 109 SF to the existing 8,001 SF, non - conforming, Spanish Mediterranean Revival, two -story single family dwelling does not meet the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards. ARPB: February 28, 2013 Action: Variance (1): Recommended denial for reasons listed above. (5 -0) Action: Variance (2): (5 -0) Action: Variance (3): (5 -0) Action: Variance (4): (5 -0) Action: Demolition: (4 -1) Action: Level III Architectural /Site Plan: Recommended denial for reasons listed above. (5 -0) Architectural Review and Planning Board ARPB File #013 -05 ARPB Thursday February 28, 2013; TC March 15, 2013 Page 3 Town Commission Date: March 15, 2013 Action: Variance (1): Granted. (3 -2) Action: Variance (2): Denied. (3 -2) Action: Variance (3): Denied. (3 -2) Action: Variance (4): Denied. (4 -1) Action: Demolition: Denied. (4 -1) Action: Level III Architectural /Site Plan: Denied. (5 -0) NOTE: At this same meeting the Town Commission, sitting as the Board of Adjustment, heard an APPEAL, filed by Mr. O'Boyle, of Mr. Thrasher's decision that variances would be needed to modify this structure as is being requested. The Board of Adjustment sustained Mr. Thrasher's decision that all four of the variances would be necessary. (See File # 13 -8) Town of Gulf Stream TOWN OF GULF STREAM 42'' "I 1 25 JAIL 15 20 ,13 To%vn of Gt0 �;;�� ,, TL ... w _ APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL This form is to be used for all development review applications to be heard by the Town of Gulf Stream Architectural Review and Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, and/or Town Commission. To complete the form properly, please review the accompanying Town of Gulf Stream Instruction Manual for Application for Development Review Form. Failure to complete this form properly will delay its consideration. To be completed by all applicants. A. Project Information PART II, GENERAL INFORMATION ARPB File #___1_3 -C-- I.A.I. Project/OwnerName: _-MAON 0 S YIP I.A.2. Project Address; I.A.3, Project Properly Legal Description: LbT 6 , (Dppkj WIVeM PbTA 6 RIFlAL.4... 1A _ n ,....,A i i e K INN r K i�Et� t l0, R��ut: R�zo� of P�crM our�� I.A.4. Project Description (describe in detail, including # of stories, etc.) IUD ITI ON 0� ENTIq ff ll '- D A- F P. W (r� NEW NTl2 fi � � L16k+T5 . I.A.5, Square Footage of New Structure or Addition: M'z 5&• t - IiN IiN aTj Architectural Style:_SCA1I69 Iy1 D1a9A WW WY(VAL _ I.A.6. Check all that apply: �Architeclural /Site Plan Review D Land Clearing 0 North 0 n out and Overlay (complete sect) n B) X Demolition of Structures 0 Non - residential u s Vari ce (complete secti6n G) sect Exception (complete section.E) I,A.7. (a) Proposed F,F.E.: NO f �'p Type of Foundation :jj�pQTI N(a B. Owner Information ^W I.B.I. Owner Address: MAKZTI M D ' 60te I.B.2. Owner Phone Number:.SH - 560 •,113 Fax: 5 - 0 - D Q I.B.3. Owner Signature: C. Agent Information 1, I n� L �� #� ¢ �IFLOP�K I.C.I. Agent Name and Firm Name: W I LLI AN6 N��KM 6KWQ V . I.C.2. Agent Address: 1.C.3. Agent Plione Number: (oJ`I ��7t/'�� c I �• Fax 1p�• ���� 1.C,4. Agent Signature: __ � � Pre -App Date; App Date: Com Date: Decision: ARPB Dale: Recommendation: TC Date: 60.4//x. Application for Development Approval Form ADA.2000 revlsed 6/13/00 Page 2 Tbwn of Gu,f Stream TOWN OF GULF STREAM s APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL This form is to be used for all development review applications to be heard by the To.vn of Gulf Stream . Architec(ural Review and Planning Board, Board of Adiustmenl, andlor Town Comm!ssfon. To complete the form properly, please review the accompanying Town of Gull Stream instruction Manual forApp,',rcatfon for Development Review Form. Failure to cbmplete this form properly will delay Its consideration. ARPB File # PART I GENERAL INFORMATION To be completed by afi applicants. L A. Project Information n,�r r2nV G I.A1. Pro ;ecUbwnerName: MAKnN �rr)vlt -L LAI Project Address;_ 2J HaN I.A.3. Protect Property Legal Description: LbT rJ { MW RAWK G'j'A'[ 6 nINEt D H T`rl b � ► 2 I N P UgTM 1W � lD, W I�� >z�co�AS of Pace B��C�([�uNtY t Rowan, I.A,4. Project Descrp(ion (describe in detail, including # ofsforfes, etc,) A ITION O� " RM`9�,?p'-o A f F W1rg MEW ENTq bna t-6,ae L.tt3NT5 . I.A.5. Square Footage of New StructumorAddiJon:IiaZ�A.r^T -UN N4ITjONAd. Architectural Style: ♦igO 1.A-6. Check a!I that ,ppiy:YArchilecturall to Plan Review 0 Land Clearing 0 North 0 out and Overlay (complete se if n B) XDemol:Lon of Structures 0 Nonresidential u s Vari ca (complete seclon G) Zpeclal Exception {complete seclfonFJ 1.A.7. (a) Proposed F,F.E.: J�1�}��� �a Type of Foundation:j�QpOTI t�try B. Owner Information I.B.I. Owner Address: MR, IR V6bAe 1.B.2. Owner Phone N ber: Fax:q- aO� �G1y� 1.8.3, Owner S!gnature: C. Agent Information MI✓ F,%1E It I.C.I. Agent Name and Firm Name: 1V'�rl� {���i in' �IVt7 WWQ� r1E�f1+tP I.C.2, Agent Address: I'M Vilil.HGrglblc7 V . Ntff 1I,��{,�2i �Jr?�r( �Z 1.131 Agent Phone Number: 1.C.4, Agent Signature: Ofgci s_ n. Pre -App Dale: ARP3 Dale: App Date: Recommendation; Core Date: TC Date: Decislon: Application for Development Approval Form ADA2000 revised 6/13100 Page 2 Town of Gulf Stream PART III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION To be completed by all applicants after pre - application conference-with Town Staff. Please be concise but brief. Attach additional sheets only when necessary and be sure to include the appropriate and concise but question. number for each response. A. Project Description and Justification III.A.1. In what zoning district is the project site located? WTH III,A.2. Is the project compatible with the intent of the zoning district? 16s []No Explain. 144P AIRAI MtV- K AKI 2V7,. I A III.A.3. Is the project"cnnsisrmv''– the Future Comprehensive Plan? 0 Yes 0 No Explain, WWI Lana use Map and goals, objectives and policies of the T iII.A.4, How are ingress and egress to the property to be provided? III.A.5. How are the following utilities to be provided to the property? a. Stormwater Drainage_ b. Sanitary Sewer n c. Potable Water d. Irrigation Water e. Electricity ND 14q f. Telephone Np N g. Gas —VkInn d t^44 h. Cable Tele ►In -.,►w. .. III.A,6. If the project involves the erection of one or more structures, please describe how the structures are consistent with the criteria in Section 66 -144 of the Town of Gulf Stream Code. (Attach additional sheet if necessary.) _Ml�, D U fAA _'N i—k%' -rV$ f-11 0-VILDiNElt MA1*5 UUI% D r- m1% I I v. Huui i IUNAL INFORMATION Section A is to be completed by all applicants after pre - application conference with Town staff. Answering "Yes "to anyquestlon in Section A requires the completion of additional Sections as indicated. A. Additional Approvals/Requirements N.A.I. Does the project involve land area within fifty feet (50') of the A1A (North Ocean Boulevard) right -of. way? 0 Yes qkNo (If "Yes ", section B of this part must be completed,) IV.A.2. Does the project involve the demolition of one or more structures? Yes 0 No (If "Yes ", section C of this part must be completed.) IV.A.3. Does the project involve the clearing or filling of any portion of an exi i vacant lot or more than fifty percent (50 %) of the landscaped area of a developed lot? 0 Yes No (If "Yes ", section D of this part must be completed.) IV-A-5. D s the project require approval of a Special Exception? Yes []No (If "Yes ", section E of this part must be completed.) IV,A.6.fe project at variance with any regulations contained in the Zoning Code? es 13 No (If "Yes ", section G of this part must be completed.) Application for Development Approval Form ADA.32000 Page 3 Town of Gulf Stream B. Projects Requiring North Ocean Boulevard Overlay Permit IV.B.1. What significant landscape features or architectural features are to be disturbed or added and to what extent? IV.B.2. Describe the need and justification for the disturbance /addition: . IV.B.3. Will the disturbance /addition destroy or seriously impair visual relationships among buildings, landscape features and open space, or introduce incompatible landscape features or plant material that destroys or impairs significant views or vistas within the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District? Yes No Explain; MBA How is the design consistent with theAlA Landscape Enhancement Project? IV.B.5. What,mitigation Is proposed so that the disturbance / addition has the least impact possible to the visual and aesthetic quality of the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District:, 'C. Projects Requiring a, Demolition Permit' N.C.I. When are the existing structures to be demolished? LkIM N PEPWIT I1S D15TA INED IV.C.2. When are the proposed. structures to be constructed? W0 PERMIT IS DSTRINED IV.C.3. What is the landmark status of the structures to be demolished? Mtge D. Projects Requiring a Land Clearing Permit M.D.I. Describe those vegetative materials of 8 inches in diameter and greater to be North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: IV.D.2. Describe the need and justification for the removal /relocation: IV.D.3. 'How is the removal from the project site of vegetation to be mitigated: IV,DA How are the remaining and relocated vegetative materials to be protected and preserved during the land clearing and constriction activities and thereafter? IV.D.5. What replacement materials are proposed? Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 4 February 2002 23 fi� ZSI" i�E� coDts�. RL E• Projects Requiring a Special Exception, IV,E,t, Is the proposed use a ' permitted special exception use? Yes p No Code Section: IV-E-2- How is the use designed, located and IQ ��b Welfare, and "�` ) morals will be protected? proposed to be operated so that the A A public health, safety, NhKIC n IV,E,3. Will the use cause substantial injury be located? ❑ Yes ' try to the value of other property in the neighborhmi �x,h,,.. a No Explain. IV,E,4, How will the use be compatible wilh djoining development Is to be located? a and the character of the District where it I�rN VF 9 J NM 6j � Te I�RoPfP IV.E.5• What landscaping p g and screening are provided? NOT APPLI NCW 1pNb5 fA IV,E,6. Does the use co orm with all applicabverni n the located? ❑Yes(No g District wherein It is to be Explain. 7 H7- N4J -,_ �vivrGIG7[/VEtkVt'rf J%lNtfx - -- t'• Non - Residential Projects and Residential "�Fi�� � �V �I D Projects of Greater th r��G. f tr! Q1 1 2 Umts IV.F.1. If common area facilities are to be provided, describe them and how they are to be maintained. IV,F.2. If recreation facilities are to be provided, describe them and their potential impacts on surroundin Properties, 9 IV-F-3. For each the following, list the number provided and their dimensions, Loading Space Standard Parking Spaces: Small Car Parking Spaces: Handicapped Parking Spaces: Driveways /Aisles: Application for Development Approval Form ADA,32000 Page 5 e,V-1 K -5ETWK-, E• Projects Requiring a Special Exception. IV.E,t, Is the proposed use a permitted special exception use? �ye5 . 2 IV-E-2- How is the use designed, located d welfare, and morals will be protected? proposed to be ❑ No Code Section: operated so that the N public health, safety, N F FF t - 8U, rt � T i �S ANCt� S16N 'V-E-3. Will the use cause substantial in'u be located? ❑ yes �No J ry to the value of other properly in the neighborhood where it Is to Explain. ( T I �AL' Ap�AP,,,HN q BUILDIN NCO WITH Wfl6 HI IV,E.4, How will the use be compatible with adjoining development is to be located? and the character of the District where it I CIS WI LL LOIN � �W N�VtiI Nrt�N w�icN s Iml���e T ���� C� IV.E•5• What landscaping and screening are provided? RAN I EJ ND � Tb1�D W.E.G. Does the use confo m with all a located? ❑ yes ZNo pplicable regulations governing the pistrict wherein it is to be Explain. ODD f-r F. Non - Residential Projects and Residential Protects of Greater than 2 Units III W.F.J. If common area facilities are to be provided, describe them and how they are to be . mamtainec Dl5 . IV,F.2, If recreation facilities are to be provided, describe them and their potential impacts on surroundin . properties, 9 IVY-3. For each of the following, list the number provided and their dimensions, Loading Spaces: Standard Parking Spaces: Small Car Parking Spaces: Handicapped Parking Spaces: Drlveways /Alsles: Application for Development Approval Form ADA,37.000 Page 6 1 n Tbwn'of Gulf Stream VK 'e r 6wy, G. Projects Requiring a Variance (code Section 66 -150 through 157) IV.G.1. From what specific Zoning Code regulation is a variance requested? IV.G.2. What does the Zoning Code require for this specific site? 'RNT %1-6AC (., W' 0E4ECTIVE` wT uNE THE (IFF DVE" DoT ONE 46 MANGED DEN TRW 14 && AND ROAD A E rtHE 5prnE IV.G.3. What Is proposed? %iF REVERSE 'SIDE OF TH 15 PAGE. IV.G.4. What is the total variance requested? &LWE b, ENCKDPOjKENT WITH 2, IV.G.5. The following 8 mandatory variance findings from Sedlion 66 -154, must be adddre�ss d Attach additional sheet if necessary.) (1) What specific conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, .or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structdres, or buildings in the same zoning district? THE tM M5 CIkANC1M AIsb A NON 0bN9RM1V INKS TEb. (2) Did the special conditions and circumstances result from the actions of the applicant? Yes No (3) Will granting the variance confer upon the applicant.any special privilege that is degied�by the Zoning Code to other lands, buildings, or sllrtictures in the same zoning district? Yes No Explain: MEN `�WK kAN606E VWkb CRAN ED AU., - -�DQ%% :9MI �12Ly �ot^�-r�D would ow 60NFDgmOa (4) How would a literal interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the same terms of the Ordinance and work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant? TA FM501. 5>rT131aCK 15 AD.I FRI M)f2 THE )LD CODE,_ But" KW ft- VI5IDU IMftM Sit WK A61V8 "I EVEN TRDM NOTH1% RP6 PNY51CAL&kJ r"NAN6Q. (5) Is the Variance requested a minimum variance that makes possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure? No Explain: U09 OLD PDE� W_G�V_f LOT UNE,TN15 (060 WOULD CoNr t -a` 5EEM5 MINIMAL, WRE TN i2� 15 Aft FAVfM�NT _ (6) Will granting the variance permit any - prohibited use to be established or re- established: Yes (7) Is the requested variance consistent witly4he,goals, policies, and objectives of the future Land Use Map of the adopted Comprehensive Plan? Y No (8) Will the variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning O, nce and not be Injurious to the area Involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? a No Explain: IT WILL ENRAWE APPEARAN& AND E bMPfTIBV WITH TIDE NI✓IGR6or 00. Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 6 February 2002 . -ZN11 ftwK G. Projects Requiring a Variance (code Section 66 -150 through 157) IV.G.1. From what specific Zoning Code regulation is a variance requested? ID - I DO — _IF SAVE 15 ble Lowf1<, rr W000 PH151CALLJ NFLICT WITH E�((5TIN6 &OFT U55. IV.G.2. What does the Zoning Code require for this specific site? THE PRt)Pb.5ED &4 NCE AT(� �5 WIT+ilN Tf 30' A16HT AJ10WAK&l u�rTHf EAVE WOVbD F--E '- �3 /�- " T e�n� I�tE M PLY. IV.G.3. What Is proposed? EAA �t " . g� ,� IV.G.4. What is the total variance requested? A V FAM 'Z -e IV,G.5. The following 8 mandatory variance findings from Section 66 -151+, rnusr oe addressed-- attach additional sheet if necessary.) (1) What specific conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, .or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, slructures, or buildings in the same zoning district? EXISDW6 BUILD + ftF LINE Bvl UT UNIJER MV05 CODE (2) Did the special conditions and circumstances result from the actions of the applicant? Yes S (3) Will granting the variance confer upon the applic ' ant.any special privilege�that is de by the Zoning Code to-other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? Yes No Explain:Tkli NE-lrl -{T fi MFIC109A IbtJ OF 1K15 HOM I UNIW e. (4) How would a literal interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the same terms of the ordinance and work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant? THl5 HIS M51CN IS UNINUI: t9 IT C.ANI&E K%KTICAM ENHAWED WITROOT MHTIN6 POTS IAL LEA-KK-1f A0 HURTIH6 THE AMOAKdE 0 -TNe 1•loU:E. (5) Is. the Variance requ a minimum variance that makes possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure Ye No Explain: MINlill`1/ M VARI AWCE lb ESRAW8 TIE A MOWX T? ft4- C�A49K It rtttf NEI4 H &4( bbD Q. (6) Will granting the variance permit any-prohibited use to be established or re- established: Yes 0 (7) Is the requested variance consistent wit oafs, policies, and objectives of the future Land Use Map of the adopted Comprehensive Plan? Yes No (8) Will the variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning nce and not be Injurious to the area Involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Yes No Explain; It ENIANCGG "4NF APFE1 '94& AND ImcgE*9 i TH16 AN Nf �2OPr✓�Rty NIALVI�S. Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 6 February 2002 I T�iERE 6 Al �EXISTI NCB AT121 U M THA-r EXTEN b5 (0 � FKDM THE ft NT PYX UFTRE- HD05E, THAI WILL 9E ZEMUUED AN b KE OCED M AN "N CE- tuEr t�N t TO-r CXMN ( 6 pN try V FkM Tif FgD N1' FACF- of- 144E �bUKzF- MEMORANDUM TO: William Thrasher Town Manager FROM: Marty R.A. Minor, AICP DATE: January 25, 2013 RE: 23 NORTH HIDDEN HARBOR DRIVE ■ LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW MEMORANDUM urban kilda y Urban Planning and Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The following is an analysis of the proposed addition to the existing home at 23 North Hidden Harbor Drive. This analysis is based on the plans prepared by Currie Sowards Aguila Architects. Request The applicant is seeking Level 3 Architectural Site Plan Approval for an addition to the existing 8,001- square foot, Spanish Mediterranean Revival home on 39,243 square feet (0.9 acres) on Lot 5 of the Hidden Harbour Estates plat. The effective lot area, not including submerged lands and areas associated with the private road, is 16,733 square feet (0.38 acres). According to the submitted documents, the applicant is requesting to demolish 229 square feet of gross floor area and replace it with 338 square feet of area for a cumulative increase of 109 square feet. The addition includes a larger entry feature for the building and minor revisions to the rear elevation. Background The Hidden Harbor Estates subdivision, consisting of eight single - family lots, was platted in 1978. The subject home was constructed in 1983, according to Palm Beach County Property Appraiser records. The house is located directly adjacent to the private canal created as part of the Hidden Harbor Estates subdivision. Access to the site is from Hidden Harbor Drive. Land Use & Zoning EXISTING USE. ZONING AND LAND USE DESIGNATIONS EXISTING USE ZONING FUTURE LAND USE Subject Site RS- North /South SF (Single Family) Single Family Home at 23 (Residential Single Family) North Hidden Harbor Drive H: \JOBS \Gulf Stream-94-012\23 North Hidden Harbor Drive\23 N. Hidden Harbor Drive Review Memorandum.doc 477 S. Rosemary Avenue Suite 225 - The Lofts at CityPlace West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 561.366.1111 fax www.UDKstudios.com LCC35 Mr. William Thrasher 23 N. Hidden Harbor Drive Review January 25, 2013 Page 3 Analysis As indicated in the Project Details section above, the subject home is not consistent with several of the requirements and standards of the Gulf Stream Design Manual. These non - conforming sections are: the building Floor Area Ratio (FAR); first -story eave height for the new entry feature; the second -story eave height for the entry feature; effective lot area; front setback; and, rear setback. As such, the home is considered a non - conforming structure in relationship to the Town's Zoning Code and Design Manual. Section 66 -131 of the Town Code addresses non - conforming structures. The applicable code section is as follows: Section 66 -131. Required conditions for continuance (4) Buildings or structures or uses of land which are nonconforming shall not be extended or enlarged, Prohibited — Greater than 23 feet Effective Lot Area 30,000 square feet 16,733 square feet No Minimum Lot 100 feet 337 feet Yes Width Maximum Second .70 of first floor 2,434 square feet Yes Floor Area area 5,407 square feet of first floor area = 3,784 square feet allowed on second floor Setbacks Front 30 feet from the 9 feet No effective lot line (11 feet, 8 inches existing front setback) Side Total of both side 32 feet on west side Yes setbacks shall be a 30 feet on east side minimum of 30% of the lot width and each side setback shall be 15 feet or larger. Rear 20 feet 10 feet No Parking 2 spaces in garage, 6 spaces Yes 2 spaces outside Analysis As indicated in the Project Details section above, the subject home is not consistent with several of the requirements and standards of the Gulf Stream Design Manual. These non - conforming sections are: the building Floor Area Ratio (FAR); first -story eave height for the new entry feature; the second -story eave height for the entry feature; effective lot area; front setback; and, rear setback. As such, the home is considered a non - conforming structure in relationship to the Town's Zoning Code and Design Manual. Section 66 -131 of the Town Code addresses non - conforming structures. The applicable code section is as follows: Section 66 -131. Required conditions for continuance (4) Buildings or structures or uses of land which are nonconforming shall not be extended or enlarged, Mr. William Thrasher January 25, 2013 23 N. Hidden Harbor Drive Review Page 4 however, a special exception may be allowed for additions to structures with existing nonconforming setbacks pursuant to the provisions of chapter 70, section 70 -75(c) of this Code. The referenced Section 70 -75(c) does allow for additions for homes with existing non- conforming setbacks only if the proposed expansion does not impact the existing non- conforming setback. With regards to the subject site, the Town Code would allow an expansion to the house as long as the addition maintained the existing 11 -foot, 8 -inch front setback. However, the application for the expansion does not maintain the existing, nonconforming, front setback. The proposed addition of the entry features encroaches approximately two (2) feet into the established non - conforming setback. This encroachment is not permitted by Section 66 -131 (4) of the Town Code. As a result, the applicant will need to seek a variance for this encroachment into the existing, non- conforming, setback. As indicated above, Section 66- 131(4) does not allow for the enlargement or expansion of the home. The subject request proposed an expansion of 109 square feet. Although the expanded area is not large, the existing house already exceeds the Town's FAR (Floor Area Ratio) limitation and a further expansion is not permitted by the Town Code. As such, the applicant will need to seek a second variance for this expansion of a nonconforming structure. The proposed entry feature creates a tower feature at the center of the house's northern elevation. This tower feature raised the home's highest roof height by more than six (6) feet. The proposed entry feature is inconsistent with the preferred roof eave heights for the first and second stories found in the Town Code. Section 70 -100 (a)(4) of the Town Code directly addresses entry features and states: "Entry features are the front portion of the structure which provides door entrance to the dwelling. The height of the entry feature is measured from the finish floor elevation to the upper portion of any balcony railings, Dutch gable or other such elements. Entry features, if used, should provide a sense of arrival, yet should not overpower them or the remainder of the structure. The scale and proportion of entry features should be consistent with the rest of the structure, varying just enough to provide a focal point to the front of the house." Currently, the home's entry feature provides for a varied elevation which is approximately two (2) feet higher than the second -story roof. This existing entry Mr. William Thrasher 23 N. Hidden Harbor Drive Review January 25, 2013 Page 5 feature is in a consistent scale and proportion with the rest of the home while allowing it to become a focal point for the elevation. The proposed entry feature extends more than eight (8) feet above the second -story roofline, which challenges whether the tower is of a consistent scale and proportion with the remainder of the house. Also, the second -story roof eave proposed for the entry feature is approximately 25 feet in height. Section 70 -100 of the Town Code states that second -story eave heights 23 feet or higher are prohibited. The preferred second story eave height is 21 feet or less and the discouraged eave height is between 21 and 23 feet. The first floor entry feature also exceeds the Town standards. The applicant is proposing 15 feet to the first floor element banding. This exceeds the Town's preferred height of 8 to 10 feet, six inches and the discouraged eave height between 10 feet, six inches and 12 feet, six inches. As a result, the applicant will need to seek variances for first and second -story eave height as proposed. Review Process As indicated above, the applicant will need to request four (4) variances from the Town's Zoning Code and Design Manual in order to achieve the presented design. The Town Code defines a variance as "deviations from the terms of (the) Code that would not be contrary to the public interest when owning to special circumstances or conditions, or when the literal enforcement of the provisions of this Code would result in undue and unnecessary hardship." The Town's Board of Adjustment (Town Commission) will make the final determination on whether to approve, approve with conditions or deny each variance request after considering recommendations from the Town Staff and the Architectural Review and Planning Board. This process can run concurrently with the Town's Level 3 Architectural Review process. In making its decision, the Board of Adjustment will have to determine that each requested variance conforms to each standard below. If each standard cannot be complied with, then the variance cannot be approved. VARIANCE STANDARDS Sec. 66 -154. Standards. When recommending or taking final action on applications for variances, the review authority must find that: (1) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district. Mr. William Thrasher 23 N. Hidden Harbor Drive Review (2) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (3) Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Code to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. (4) Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of this Code and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant. (5) The variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use ofthe land, building or structure. (6) Granting the variance would not permit to be established or re- established any use prohibited in that zoning district. (7) Granting the variance is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies and future land use map of the adopted comprehensive plan. (8) Granting the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Code and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. January 25, 2013 Page 6 Recommendation The proposed entry feature exceeds the preferred and discouraged eave heights outlined in the Section 70 -100 of the Town Code. The first story entry feature height is 15 feet, which is in excess of the 12 feet, six inches which is prohibited by the Code. The proposed second -story eave height of 25 feet exceeds the "prohibited" eave height of 23 feet or higher. As such, the proposed entry feature is out of scale with the rest of the existing structure and is not compliant with the Town's Code. It is recommended that the applicant revise the entry feature to reduce its height to be in conformance with the Town's Code. Until then, a recommendation for approval cannot be provided for this request. \J� " . ABI - ��� .� - � � . � . . 7wl- MEMO- Aft ���������� ; , ��, ���� �� I ��' R ��+ ��k , t Y . ' , , ��, i �� i �� ��' ����" : ��' �� " ��, ��, - t �� ��. ; + , > r , ���� ��$ �� i , = �� �� ��, ��1 / t �� - 1 _ I ��1 ��1 ` �� : . 1 t f . �� ` �� �� i , . s �� y / / ! ; �� . ��L ����_ " . . s ��' - , , . �� . . . c a m ��. . . , , �� , ; o y I r ' . , ��. . J �� - ���� ��. ��, �� ' . ���� ��, ���� ���� ���� �� t i _ ���� �� ` �� _ ��, , I t ' ��' _ i �� . i t �� ������. . 1 " , \ ��, ��s , , , . �� , f �� ������J - - s ��. , ; " t i ' ��a ' : 1 �� . i . ���� ����, I �� \ ��` . ���� ��\ x t i a % - - ��. ' k - i ' i l \ \ i . �� ���� �� ��- �� . �� ' 1 ' i . i - ��. �� , 1 ; , r , 1 ����Y 1 t 1 9 I � �� 1 ' �� , : ' ����' ��. . ��' I it gill #�o N g� w�z y�pp mp � a-c ag IRE r r4 'FRI a2 ag e - �C a U^ n cv t+U ATLAIVT /C OCEAN � o n � w 1 & 2 Sia?Y WSVD CE N.8'13'45 "E. 130.18' I OCEAN BOULEVARD (COUNTY ROAD A.K.A. S.R. Al A) op 130.18' - APPROXIMATE M.H.W.L. EL. =0.34' NAVD —0.0' NAVD- - - - - -- ATLANTIC OCEAN r CA 3� r t.. P-� n�1 N ti a� r: V C 1 I -- 1 � \ N. ---------------I--- - _ �1� --------------------------- N CC) im z A T L A N 7 1 O C E Q =v N o w � co Sri M��d�E� y ;a- F q ee J03 N0. DRAM NC >tl J09 S_AL mn11II11 ^ I A�Nm ___' S 1 I c 00 �o >. LIMITS OF BEACH DUNE APPROXIMATE S.H.W.L. EL. =4.47' NAVD - APPROXIMATE M.H.W.L. EL. =0.34' NAVD —0.0' NAVD- - - - - -- ATLANTIC OCEAN r CA 3� r t.. P-� n�1 N ti a� r: V C 1 I -- 1 � \ N. ---------------I--- - _ �1� --------------------------- N CC) im z A T L A N 7 1 O C E Q =v N o w � co Sri M��d�E� y ;a- F q ee J03 N0. DRAM NC >tl J09 S_AL Vl urged S g, i Z g NOceaNAl a `. CONSULTANT CONSULTANT � �ry a C n a 4 3 ti mn11II11 ^ I A�Nm mnnUU11-�� S <o�po£o A$o 00 �o >. Li a° `>' x n IT m 1w� plo u wm of �ONa K 3 '� NN �N SO � 10 o �-3 in'om v nl o O 4 xr N � u y °x Z N J m OO G yy x x xx x xxx U U i U Z 2 Coo VS! 2 00 xx �tT Z 0Z 0 xi x IIII �I II� A �� m� nZOO S D \\ U V NN Vl urged S g, i Z g NOceaNAl a `. CONSULTANT CONSULTANT � �ry a C n a 4 3 ti i I I n I am I �x a� az I a° M m I I I / II II II II II II II I�Ij II II II II II II II II y 0-' III III II ICI I 3° on II Tol II - - - -- I I II II m Ox II II II o mX I °Z II II o II I a I II °n z o: I I II II II , ; II II II II II II i _ I I II II II Im I �x rn ,o: I 'AZ n n I O — 1 � II II II I I II II II I � w r1i III 111 mx m-I I I II _J, 1 _0 I I II II II 'Il II II II II II II II II II II II III II YI 11 II II II / � m m rx y 0-' OZ I 3° on I I II aZ <° - - - -- I I II II m Ox 00 II II II 11 ax m� a —I ZZ a� m X �a n I t- I a� I 3 I i I I I I I / X Y I I I \ n / \ / I X i Y I I B m O X o� oZ �n II � m — � X a- ax Z_ =2 -� z _° xm I I I I I X 3 1 I I I 1 I I I I I 9011 II I X011 II I II II II II II II II II II II II II — II _ — X II rn m m rx y 0-' OZ I 3° on I I II aZ <° - - - -- I I II II m Ox 00 II II II 11 II II II II II II II II II II II II — II _ — X II rn m m rx y 0-' OZ I 3° on I I II �Y I m rx I m- I aZ <° - - - -- I I II II m Ox II II II 11 °n o: I I 3EF m m i REVISION GATE c NAT °' r o Toll — �r cn DIG 140 CHK. R SCALE JOD I:O. DRA55':I:G 7 JOB SEAL CONSULTANT CONSULTANT fj ------------------------ I I' — — — — — I I - I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I I I I i I I ---------- - - - - -L II I I II I I II I II I ,lam ---- - - - - -- - II I I — I IJ I I I I II II I I II II I I ' II II I I o II II I I ° II II I I ,ti II II 1 I � II II I I II II I I II II I I II II II II I I II II — I' I I I II I -1 I I I I I II vi I I II II I.I II IJ' LI I I,I I I l II II I _ II II I II II I II II LI I I I II II I II II I II II I I'I, I1 I — — — — I -------- - - - - -- II II I II I II I - - - -- f-71 I 35:12 M $� I e_ -Ye — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I REVISIONS ti C � DATE DY;G. ND SCAa III L' E I —�I I I \ I y � ' s /sue a o N�e eg lk �l; N U]� y e :o o v6r joB NO. DRA—G >� J0B SEAL CONSULTANT CONSULTANT px / t� n H O z a 0 z � 4 �1 urwtltlr I )HDHHID$� �)HD88DD _ - ••�tlYwrYY�„ MtlMY I _ iwwwr ,w• rYtlrl....l - c,e r•, iff REVISIONS 4�d fE d�aEo N' �ttl ca� �Cy o s Cp a I 9 OAT,spa @ao e0€ oploi OD oy �LzJom �� \ S M. Mg 55 0 ;Sa- ���2555 UV;G. NO I.--, L SCALE F � J03 N0. D�AV':: t;G '� ,IOB� SEAL COlISULTANi CONSULTANT a �� � f7 M j® a \ 2 ME111-011 ■/ \ w > \ ) § ) % 0 / £ » « ? e \ % w w .�, i� $ r ro, � C3 C! � t v ' REVISIONS _ � \� � � . w mom » | )% •.= 2§ t:5 \ P, /B g2) LR11, I | n « | |h a = _m |S � , r _ter h §\ \ � r cn > O #~ -7) m --I / £ » « ? e \ % w w .�, i� $ r ro, � C3 C! � t v ' REVISIONS _ � \� � � . w mom » | )% •.= 2§ t:5 \ P, /B g2) LR11, I | n « | |h a = _m |S � , r _ter h §\ \ TOWN OF GULF STREAM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING REPORT Application #: 013 -06 Owner: M/M Robert Julien Address: 1601 North Ocean Blvd. Agent: Mark Marsh, Digby Bridges, Marsh & Assoc. Proposed Improvement: Construct a 392 SF addition to an existing Spanish Mediterranean Revival style single family dwelling. Approvals Requested: Level II Architectural /Site Plan To permit an addition of 392 SF to the south east corner of the existing Spanish Mediterranean Revival style single family dwelling, to enclose an existing breezeway on the north side of the dwelling and to install a roof over the existing trellis connection to the existing guest house. Gross Lot size: 112,258 SF Effective Lot Area: 84,506 SF Proposed Total Floor Area: 19,322 SF Allowable: 19,501 SF Zoning District: RS -B, Beach Height: 16'6", (roof height <_20' Preferred) Proposed Architectural Style: Mediterranean, matching existing structure Adjacent Residences: Mediterranean Issues Considered During Review: Section 70 -70 Floor area calculation Section 70 -74 Setbacks Section 70 -187 Table of district standards Section 70 -100 Roof and eave height Recommendation: Motion to approve level II Architectural/ Site Plan, based on a finding that the proposed addition of 392 SF to the south east corner of the existing Spanish Mediterranean Revival style single family dwelling, to enclose an existing breezeway on the north side of the swelling and to install a roof over the existing trellis connection to the existing guest house meet the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards. ARPB Date: February 28, 2013 Action: Level II Architectural/ Site Plan: Approved as submitted. (5 -0) Town of Gulf Stream TOWN OF GULF STREAM C, A LvigI e -�' 0--)& JAN 2. t 2013 TW 'YtJ of C-UU S..roar", rl. APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL This form is to be used for all development review applications to be heard by the Town of Gulf Stream Architectural Review and Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, and /or Town Commission. To complete the form properly, please review the accompanying Town of Gulf Stream Instruction Manual for Application for Development Review Form. Failure to complete this form properly will delay its consideration. ARPB File #13= O b To be completed by all applicants. PART II. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Project Information I.A.I. Project/OwnerName: Mr. & Mrs. Robert Julien I.A.2. Project Address: 1601 N. Ocean Blvd, Gulf Stream I.A.3. Project Property Legal Description: See attached I.A.4. Project Description (describe in detail, including # of stories, etc.) Addition to S . E corner (ground floor) main house, enclose an existing breezeway on north side and install a roof over existing trellis connection I.A.5. Square Footage of New Structure or Addition: _ to quest house Architectural Style: Medit rranean Revi va l I.A.6. Check all that apply: ,Architectural /Site Plan Review ❑ Land Clearing ❑ North Ocean Boulevard Overlay (complete section B) ❑ Demolition of Structures ❑ Non - residential uses ❑ Variance (complete section G) ❑ Special Exception (complete section.E) 1.A.7. (a) Proposed F.F.E.: B. Owner Information Type of Foundation: Pi 1 i I.B.1. Owner Address:_ 1 601 � - Ocean Blvd , Gulf Stream, FL 33435 11 1 I.B.2, Owner Phone Number: 561 8 9500 I.B.3. Owner Signature: C. Agent Information I.C.I . Agent Name and Firm Name: I.C.2. Agent Address: 18 Via Miz I.C.3. Agent Phone Number: (o) 832 - 1.C.4. Agent Siqnature: /, Pre -App Date: App Date: — Com Date: _ Decision: Fax: M. Mark Marsh Bridges, Marsh & Associates TC Date: 14AL. (.4 113 7,0 1, &1 f /_ r-1 :3 alm Bach,_ FL 3 M_1� IK�� J V F, Mlffe only IKa —ti o 7n: Application for Development Approval Form ADA.2000 revised 6/13/00 Fax Page 2 Town of Gulf Stream PART III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION To be completed by all applicants after pre- application conference with Town Staff. Please be concise but brief. Attach additional sheets only when necessary and be sure to include the appropriate and complete question number for each response. A. Project Description and Justification III.A.1. In what zoning district is the project site located? Beach Front ?Its-L8 III.A.2. Is the project compatible with the intent of the zoning district? X Yes No Explain: Meets or exceeds all zonincf criteria III.A.3. Is the project consistent with the Future Land Use Map and goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan? XYes No Explain: Meets or exceeds all zoning criteria III.A.4. How are ingress and egress to the property to be provided? existing drivewa III.A.5. How are the following utilities being provided to the property? a. Stormwater Drainage on site b. Sanitary Sewer _ septic c. Potable water city d. Irrigation Water city e. Electricity FP & L f. Telephone AT &T g. Gas Florida Public T i1;tiP h. Cable Television Comcast III.A.6. If the project involves the erection of one or more structures, please describe how the structures are consistent with the criteria in Section 66 -144 of the Town of Gulf Stream Code. (Attach additional sheet if necessary.) N/A PART IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Section A is to be completed by all applicants after pre - application conference with Town staff Answering "Yes" to any question in Section A requires the completion of additional Sections as indicated. A. Additional Approvals /Requirements IV.A.1. Does the project involve land area within fifty feet (50') of the Al (North Ocean Boulevard) right -of -way? Yes XNo (If "Yes ", Section B of this part must be completed.) IV.A.2. Does the project involve the demolition of one or more structures? Yes No X (If "Yes ", Section C of this part must be completed.) IV.A.3. Does the project involve the clearing or the filling of any portion of an existing vacant lot or more than fifty percent (50 %) of the landscape area of a developed lot? Yes (?N)o (If "Yes ", Section D of this part must be completed.) IV.A.4. Does the project require approval of a Special Exception? Yes No XX (If "Yes ", Section E of this part must be completed.) IV.A.5. Is the project at variance with any regulations contained in the Zoning Code? Yes XXIO (If "Yes ", Section G of this part must be completed.) Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 3 February 2002 1'6.vn of Gulf Stream B. Projects Requiring North Ocean Boulevard Overlay Permit IV.B.1. What significant landscape features or architectural features are to be disturbed or added and to what extent? N/A IV.6.2. Describe the need and justification for the disturbance /addition: N/A IV.B.3. Will the disturbance /addition destroy or seriously impair visual relationships among buildings, landscape features and open space, or introduce incompatible landscape features or plant material that destroys or impairs significant views or vistas within the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District? Yes No Explain: N/A IV.B.4. How is the design consistent with the AM Landscape Enhancement Project? N/A IV.B.5. What mitigation is proposed so that the disturbance /addition has the least impact possible to the visual and aesthetic quality of the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: N/A C. Projects Requiring a Demolition Permit IV.C.1. When are the existing structures to be demolished? IV.C.2. When are the proposed structures to be constructed? IV.C.3. What is the landmark status of the structures to be demolished? N/A 0. Projects Requiring a Land Clearing Permit IV.D.1. Describe those vegetative materials of 8 inches in diameter and greater to be North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: N/A IV.D.2. Describe the need and justification for the removal /relocation: IV.D.3. How is the removal from the project site of vegetation to be mitigated: IV.D.4. How are the remaining and relocated vegetative materials to be protected and preserved during the land clearing and constriction activities and thereafter? IV.D.5. What replacement materials are proposed? Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 4 February 2002 vucdlll E. Projects Requiring a Special Exception. ME-1. Is the proposed use a permitted special exception use? ❑ Yes ❑ No Code Section: IV.E.2. How is the use designed, located and proposed to be operated so that the public health, safety, welfare, and morals will be protected? N/A IV.E.3. Will the use cause substantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood where it is to be located? ❑ Yes ❑ No Explain. IV.EA. How will the use be compatible with adjoining development and the character of the District where it is to be located? IV.E.5. What landscaping and screening are provided? IV.E.6. Does the use conform with all applicable regulations governing the District wherein it is to be located? ❑ Yes ❑ No Explain. F. Non - Residential Projects and Residential Projects of Greater than 2 Units IV.F.1. If common area facilities are to be provided, describe them and how they are to be maintained. IV.F.2. If recreation facilities are to be provided, describe them and their potential impacts on surrounding properties. IV.F.3. For each of the following, list the number provided and their dimensions Loading Spaces: Standard Parking Spaces: Small Car Parking Spaces: Handicapped Parking Spaces: Driveways /Aisles: Application for Development Approval Form ADA.32000 Page 5 of Gulf Stream G. Projects Requiring a Variance (code Section 66 -150 through 157) IV.G.1. From what specific Zoning Code regulation is a variance requested? N/A IV.G.2. What does the Zoning Code require for this specific site? IV.G.3. What is proposed? IV.G.4. What is the total variance requested? IV.G.5. The following 8 mandatory variance findings from Section 66 -154, must be addressed: (Attach additional sheet if necessary.) (1) What specific conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure,.or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district? (2) Did the special conditions and circumstances result from the actions of the applicant? Yes No (3) Will granting the variance confer upon the applicant.any special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Code to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? Yes No Explain: (4) How would a literal interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the same terms of the ordinance and work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant? (5) Is the Variance requested the minimum variance that makes possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure? Yes No Explain: (6) Will granting the variance permit any prohibited use to be established or re- established: Yes No (7) Is the requested variance consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the future Land Use Map of the adopted Comprehensive Plan? Yes No (8) Will the variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Yes No Explain: Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 6 February 2002 um, of gulf Stream H. Projects Requiring Rezoning IV-H.1. What is the Future Land Use designation of the project site? N/A IV.H.2. If the project involves a rezoning, Zoning Code text change, ,Future Land Use Map change, Comprehensive Plan text change, or any combination thereof, please describe the need and justification for the request. PART V. OPTIONAL INFORMATION This entire Part is optional for all applicants. Applicants are encouraged, but not required, to provide any additional relevant information regarding the project that was not covered elsewhere on this form or on any of the other materials submitted with the application. Application for Development Approval Form ADA.2000 revised 6/8/00 Page 7 DFSCRIPTION: P FGINNING AT A POINT ON. THE C FNTFRI INF OF OC FAN P OUI FVARD, AS NOW .I AID OUT AND FSTAP I ISHFD, 268 FFFT NORTH OF, MFASURFD AT .RIGHT ANGI FS TO THE SOUTH I INF OF I OT ONF (1), SFCTIO.N 10, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGF 43 FAST; RUN THFNC F FAST ON A I INF PARAI I FI TO THE SOUTH I INF OF SAID I OT ONF (1), SFCTIO.N 10, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGF 43 FAST, TO THE WATFRS OF THE ATI ANTIC OC FAN; RUN THFNC F NORTHFRI Y AI ONG THE WATFRS OF THE ATI ANTIC OCEAN TO A POINT 468 FFFT .NORTH OF MFASURFD AT RIGHT ANGI FS TO THE SAID SOUTH I INF OF I OT ONF (1) SECTION ' 10, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGF; RUN THFNCF WFST ON A I INF 468 FFFT NORTH. OF AND PARAI I FI TO THE SAID SOUTH I INF OF I OT ONF (1), SFCTION 10, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGF 43 FAST, TO THE C FNTFRI INF OF THE OC FAN P OUI FVARD, AS NOW I AID OUT AND FSTAP I ISHFD; RUN THFNC F SOUTHFRI Y AI ONG THE C FNTFRI INF OF SAID OC FAN POUI FV;APD TO THE POINT OF P FGINNING, I FSS THE WFST 30.0 FFFT. THFRFOF; ITOGFTHFR WITH Al I I.ITTORAI RIGHTS THFRFUNTO P FI ONGING OR IN ANYWISE , APPFRTAINING, SAID I AND P FIND THE SOUTH 200 FFFT OF THE NORTH 400 FFFT OF THF' SOUTH 668 FFFT OF I OT ONF (1), SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 46' SOUTH, RANGF 43 FAST, IPING FAST OF OCEAN ROUT FVARD. BRIDGES, MARSH & ASSOC. 21 January 2013 JAN t '2Z013 Mr. William Thrasher Town Manager Town of Gulf Stream 100 Sea Road Gulf Stream, FL 33482 RE: ADDITIONS TO EXISTING RESIDENCE 1601 N. Ocean Blvd. Dear Mr. Thrasher, You had previously requested a landscape plan be submitted with the attached ARPB Level I submission. However, on behalf of the Owner, we would like to be exempt from this request as the area of proposed addition affects minimal landscape change. The area (S.E. corner of residence) affected has some existing foundation material and some coconut palms, these will be reinstated or supplemented after completion of the construction. The area immediately to south is densely landscaped and will provide ample screening from the neighbor to the South. Your cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated. Kind regards Yours sincerely, TES, INC. BRIDGES, MARSH & Assoc., INC. chartered architects EIGHTEEN VIA MIZNER • PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33480 • 561 832 1533 • FAx: 561 832 1520 DCB -# AR 0008738 MM- #AR0009030 GV- #AR92276 i � � a M � • �. RRRRR 11 � _ 1 _ p ` �.w I - - � 'f .• �.r � t f, � � -1 { t f y r, � � •��r,t s. .. ri � �i � ♦� s • ` � nit 'ir�^ ,t f r �% N " P M ) , w ' 4 4' y 4W7 T r � Y w �r 1 m r . P-5 y � 4 f lot ,fix , ZIP`w r � !fir'''" , ►, 1 x r i� SOUTH COVE 0 0 0 �00lPHIN PILE -- J2GIM9 // N05'45'00'E 100.60' Kuw MCK 1 12.35 n� y l:2 I c I al `� N (A J � u sl n p rQ `N a L �i� 0�, n14.ss•�' a I / / / / / z� 7 &' •V� • 18.66 I �p � ,A r 0 Iv 0 Li ' �6 I 'i2© 'tao I I 77.29 22. 7,2' u o 0 566 °36'00'W 177.30' o OG)ZT'n O — DC�mr 20tO — — — — _ - - -- — — — — - -- O -IKO 1-0 N r i 0 _ _ _ 0 o In m Y o 'n -o m N N06'36'6o'E 177.30' -- 0 " -' r- �' POLO DRIVE N Z O y o ° C.. ��o�m — — — — — — — ° — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ��icnZD — --- - - - - -- - -- 8 A o � O NDbm z m D c r< w \ V A s $ m o =omzo D n m �c�mNm m � o -nzxmx� • mm X m pf^ N AjmOZS Zp -n gl m -aiym� m'-i V `L-N1 pZ]mm -a1 O X' v O m z Z Z z0M,z a o rnamZ'o- a 3 m mm p� m H v95myv00 o1x� n m 0 m O a m m �=°cz ��faj 3�0 <_ m Ow O m ara°mZ° y m w_ Oz N �amG07�9 ZCy oym �. I CmZmmm, :n8 IL 29�'m"6. ]1 C al rTl = O -n V ZpADU m-1 y� r�rly V/ ZVl rtlnp� RI O O o00Zm< m mz C7 � � � �mgo�z o�,i�} C A m O °0N09�mp9 C N Tp p G7 O O o.mm- �$ 2 Pa ,y m O o G1 O m m O mmmzm W 9 r co �� z- ax ��a z o �1 w N t3 r) a N m$ N o CI , s", E. zr--m ._. - m00- 1Tmm.m °'OOr mD mooxm -.pmm mcpo rm�1r gjgmrgi c=20,. mm -4 >r c m o z yio�X .� a� i+. a ' m �Qm�sa ?moo o Q amt Gl N Sm oQ1Nr-m'° ,Hp: �p -miA z d 3 m Zozryrzlcz ..000-1 M'Z _ 0 G m rt y.I I.A�tH-0 -rLI �I'�o' -SO--�11D Z. -=m-I ' �• W py memo Go T m p-pi tn`po,� 13Sr p0 N m L �NY�m.Zm D -q' a.n m K y r yzm �o AS C K O ° N O o m o o D � m d L1 S_ m-inp C C0m nr 0 0 x 3 'c m Np", oo� o0 m 3 �zyo'°nmpm e� mm Z :< m L"yn�•rz0 UM p I inpm'1y Oi .hp''n mZ1!0i mo imjrri-7 mz • - Or 0. al -i LY-i mo ay° aY-1� wS >lCT Zip rNC p O!+ - V rri yy imri D -1 � m N i -2 olZ' -n. mm T9. Q . C) D G- z n c 3 '� m )o = CD C= C �z C ° --n " � ° r m 4 'A L SEANALL T CAPJ ----------- /02.'. S3 - - - - I_° � � � J rJ° l •�' a •�^ ' 1.20' 1 12.40' 3, • COVEAEO r $ I I g J J 34.30' Z STORY x, RESIDENCE +r .N 1 12.70' � � 12.70' N � I I • r• G3 r ry 0.70' !B 65' 7 • 18.66 I �p � ,A r 0 Iv 0 Li ' �6 I 'i2© 'tao I I 77.29 22. 7,2' u o 0 566 °36'00'W 177.30' o OG)ZT'n O — DC�mr 20tO — — — — _ - - -- — — — — - -- O -IKO 1-0 N r i 0 _ _ _ 0 o In m Y o 'n -o m N N06'36'6o'E 177.30' -- 0 " -' r- �' POLO DRIVE N Z O y o ° C.. ��o�m — — — — — — — ° — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ��icnZD — --- - - - - -- - -- 8 A o � O NDbm z m D c r< w \ V A s $ m o =omzo D n m �c�mNm m � o -nzxmx� • mm X m pf^ N AjmOZS Zp -n gl m -aiym� m'-i V `L-N1 pZ]mm -a1 O X' v O m z Z Z z0M,z a o rnamZ'o- a 3 m mm p� m H v95myv00 o1x� n m 0 m O a m m �=°cz ��faj 3�0 <_ m Ow O m ara°mZ° y m w_ Oz N �amG07�9 ZCy oym �. I CmZmmm, :n8 IL 29�'m"6. ]1 C al rTl = O -n V ZpADU m-1 y� r�rly V/ ZVl rtlnp� RI O O o00Zm< m mz C7 � � � �mgo�z o�,i�} C A m O °0N09�mp9 C N Tp p G7 O O o.mm- �$ 2 Pa ,y m O o G1 O m m O mmmzm W 9 r co �� z- ax ��a z o �1 w N t3 r) a N m$ N o CI , s", E. zr--m ._. - m00- 1Tmm.m °'OOr mD mooxm -.pmm mcpo rm�1r gjgmrgi c=20,. mm -4 >r c m o z yio�X .� a� i+. a ' m �Qm�sa ?moo o Q amt Gl N Sm oQ1Nr-m'° ,Hp: �p -miA z d 3 m Zozryrzlcz ..000-1 M'Z _ 0 G m rt y.I I.A�tH-0 -rLI �I'�o' -SO--�11D Z. -=m-I ' �• W py memo Go T m p-pi tn`po,� 13Sr p0 N m L �NY�m.Zm D -q' a.n m K y r yzm �o AS C K O ° N O o m o o D � m d L1 S_ m-inp C C0m nr 0 0 x 3 'c m Np", oo� o0 m 3 �zyo'°nmpm e� mm Z :< m L"yn�•rz0 UM p I inpm'1y Oi .hp''n mZ1!0i mo imjrri-7 mz • - Or 0. al -i LY-i mo ay° aY-1� wS >lCT Zip rNC p O!+ - V rri yy imri D -1 � m N i -2 olZ' -n. mm T9. Q . C) D G- z n c 3 '� m )o = CD C= C �z C ° --n " � ° r m 4 'A L $ m o =omzo D n m �c�mNm m � o -nzxmx� • mm X m pf^ N AjmOZS Zp -n gl m -aiym� m'-i V `L-N1 pZ]mm -a1 O X' v O m z Z Z z0M,z a o rnamZ'o- a 3 m mm p� m H v95myv00 o1x� n m 0 m O a m m �=°cz ��faj 3�0 <_ m Ow O m ara°mZ° y m w_ Oz N �amG07�9 ZCy oym �. I CmZmmm, :n8 IL 29�'m"6. ]1 C al rTl = O -n V ZpADU m-1 y� r�rly V/ ZVl rtlnp� RI O O o00Zm< m mz C7 � � � �mgo�z o�,i�} C A m O °0N09�mp9 C N Tp p G7 O O o.mm- �$ 2 Pa ,y m O o G1 O m m O mmmzm W 9 r co �� z- ax ��a z o �1 w N t3 r) a N m$ N o CI , s", E. zr--m ._. - m00- 1Tmm.m °'OOr mD mooxm -.pmm mcpo rm�1r gjgmrgi c=20,. mm -4 >r c m o z yio�X .� a� i+. a ' m �Qm�sa ?moo o Q amt Gl N Sm oQ1Nr-m'° ,Hp: �p -miA z d 3 m Zozryrzlcz ..000-1 M'Z _ 0 G m rt y.I I.A�tH-0 -rLI �I'�o' -SO--�11D Z. -=m-I ' �• W py memo Go T m p-pi tn`po,� 13Sr p0 N m L �NY�m.Zm D -q' a.n m K y r yzm �o AS C K O ° N O o m o o D � m d L1 S_ m-inp C C0m nr 0 0 x 3 'c m Np", oo� o0 m 3 �zyo'°nmpm e� mm Z :< m L"yn�•rz0 UM p I inpm'1y Oi .hp''n mZ1!0i mo imjrri-7 mz • - Or 0. al -i LY-i mo ay° aY-1� wS >lCT Zip rNC p O!+ - V rri yy imri D -1 � m N i -2 olZ' -n. mm T9. Q . C) D G- z n c 3 '� m )o = CD C= C �z C ° --n " � ° r m 4 'A L Q . C) D G- z n c 3 '� m )o = CD C= C �z C ° --n " � ° r m 4 'A L 'A L Pri �� r 111 S €o M• Rat f9f Avg 1 °83 C7 m MINE ji yj RA opys o� g q%g 8 z - POLO DRIVE O `e n m Z G-) t� N CD n, ® M w �.4 O Wz ~ rn 3° o v w Cj) M r ITT REVISIONS ��AF�9•A�!t..�d �F��.'Rr� � �� �� Y• � F4g 4F P YG N gF� -��A �..�• � � -,, j!p! i z r� P4 �4 DWG. NO. Glltt DI:W SLALE 1 "'t t.�+ I 't ���:.: � � (/] !I �I r �Q�••� '-7 Q Z 'b U] tyrJ v E tl II A� ail f] / II� 00 Q � tY � s g V. y S rte• � � rZ P x H „ zz yz z z as a o eg s N O `e n m Z G-) t� N CD n, ® M w �.4 O Wz ~ rn 3° o v w Cj) M r ITT REVISIONS ��AF�9•A�!t..�d �F��.'Rr� � �� �� Y• � F4g 4F P YG N gF� -��A �..�• � � -,, j!p! i z r� P4 �4 DWG. NO. Glltt DI:W SLALE 1 "'t t.�+ I 't ���:.: � � (/] !I �I r �Q�••� '-7 Q Z 'b U] tyrJ v E tl II A� ail f] / II� �� f ) ' ��5 ' G . N n . D A T E �� G I - I R p R l 4 ' i w I f N S i , A I F R E V I S I O N S 5 1 p y g b 7 ��' N J d N > 0 V 1 o S E A L 3 T w I V r n 0 f n Z r n y N p S 2 O A L C F i e 9 Q p �� L A F e - r S n O C p y y p q �� �� G O N S l A 1 A N T �� S �� C a m ] / I \ 4 J ) , $A|� ! Q -n _ COO m aq s 7 I-- "-,- Co m rg C CA3 ) 0 - / 7; M 2 i I i � rn g 7n � !§ § e § ■ § § ! | | _ % M m e � Q M 2 r JOK .� C) r r 0 0 b z rrom In hlr C -v 7v r rn rn —� 5- N rn z o� C 0 o no`�m 3" T �cws�,orls p �� o #�8 I H W PATE It I II 9H 0!4 FSV =A .. h k %yam PIVG_ I:D. PI'Itt PR'�Vt S;AL'` v 5w tz J Sn l J 0 0 d r� a I-3 r� r C y O I gm � !p m Mpi III 1 11111111111111 ■ I� z Lid a a r — tt y�lllll�llllllll� O j FLT uuumuuu 1 IIIII IIIIIIIIIII III uu 1111111i uuululuu Er E offmil MKIII., I son millrwumi F \ REVISIONSgR .� S x �pp€ �. } y� tz aa CD Qtva rc. uirc uRsr scaL� 6 h SFAI- CONSULTANT � y C] 1�O 0 rn o rn w o • T III 1 11111111111111 ■ I� z Lid a a r — tt y�lllll�llllllll� O j FLT uuumuuu 1 IIIII IIIIIIIIIII III uu 1111111i uuululuu Er E offmil MKIII., I son millrwumi F \ REVISIONSgR .� S x �pp€ �. } y� tz aa CD Qtva rc. uirc uRsr scaL� 6 h SFAI- CONSULTANT � y C] 1�O 0 'b .b O L=J d r�r^ VD a I� r-1 t� c a Z F g 4 8 n i I I� r. 4 I Ml z :+ ; g H H m^ m too M CJi �O m N REV15ION5 p AR EgRq eey T DATE II ���� - ■�■■ - �■■■- �■■■ •- ������������re -����� FE64:EE�Bo ;�q'p F.. Oro tO� �,"�� r z v' C y Tq v 2 3J fg N DWG. NO, GNtt DR SCALE A 7 JOO f:0 oRA \`; r. ^7 (:/] �ERL GONSULTANi eX Z hh H 1--I Z U1 O x r� r t� c H O o ml 0 0 ti� C 12 - ! w ( r rf,1!trf I �I� ,I'I' I (;; ,`� I I, I y ,al;= , ., VIII I Iii I IIII i II 1 I I I: I �'�III• li' I� R I 1 IIII it (I I I I 1 II i it _1 o REVISION5 DATE ry r o DWG. NO. CNK DRW' SCALE O O d z 0 IC oS s o � II I N S` C Va I I is IIII:i' L, I I m � � N G CD m .3`iY —I1 o REVISION5 DATE ry r o DWG. NO. CNK DRW' SCALE O O d z 0 IC oS s o � II I N S` s Sao m JOB NO DRAW�tiG � � in SEAL CONSULTANT � �° y � �,_ � __ 1 �1 L l�`• -,_\ C Va s Sao m JOB NO DRAW�tiG � � in SEAL CONSULTANT � �° y � �,_ � __ 1 �1 L l�`• -,_\ F K}l— pp _ 3 s� ° °aSoa'° c�J��,j^ €3:�g9g� QQ�gc3 PEI a � Al I O oRa wl US. '<. -N g g- =.'8-A �-ags R °'@.� H711- --dig ' ; H 9asAa�s°s £,s° R?'A 1,9 9se^:- $I q Q -� LY EA 'gas -I' fag a s s $¢ a pr Z r spp T1� i•iLm�z POLO DRIVE 9g.zKg 2 a n�4 " �$ — E 4 R � oR h 3° �R R 3' �I z Z IA Z O a m S (A B 3� 3 O Dx n cy�yi 0 0 m m .Zl A D rl O v m R g y O v Z S R A N !1 C s Z N O m m R D O b+v Uv _n ax vc• �� �'gn N51 m� ° m 3 3 ° 3 :R,gm N3 ; 3 gas a s i a n � y y D \ _I <C< ICI i ; O �7 1 I (t N aO fl w co) = _I_ s s y �s. m v D rn �D D z ? V S O Dx n cy�yi 0 0 m m .Zl A D rl O v m R g y O v Z S R A N !1 C s Z N O m m R D O b+v Uv _n ax vc• �� �'gn N51 m� ° m 3 3 ° 3 :R,gm N3 ; 3 gas a s i a n � y y D O <C< ICI D C ; O nD 2 (t N aO fl w co) = x s y Z m v D rn �D D z ? V S N N y7 V I D (On Z D C 9 C NJ c) o m —Ti o � S O n n o -G X • UI O U U N U m O _ O N M cn O r rn O U N A 9 M A O o M z r y z o I D D 3 Z m o D m Z TI r C m (m y � i I I I I I I I W m ti 2 N O a e" R -s sR. o 3 a -.m g�aSaaaa�gS$�,�a3aaF 3m m °y 9 g$ oc as 2 5 1 EL a' a' S °g3 R 2 $s' 8 ^ — — — — — 02- O OR z d � a o � z a 3 B a � CC/] x y 3 >o M IT _., Z\:) ® r w co) N� D z z o x °�sZ mm a v D rn �D SD z ? m On � O A m N y7 V I G7 ca C D C NJ c) o m —Ti o � m n n o M W � I m O _ M cn r rn O M A O o M z r y z o I D D 3 Z m o D m Z TI r C m (m y OR z d � a o � z a 3 B a � CC/] x y 3 >o M IT ® r w co) N� D z z o x °�sZ mm a v D rn �D �3 m z ? m On � O A m N y7 V I OR z d � a o � z a 3 B a � CC/] x y n O Z n m �r O Z D O m �z s SOUTH COVE 100.00' - - - -- - - - -- —N_ 05'_45' 00" E.- r, 1 \$ 16 F , 10 �i I O N N x cn CD i D O � I x i O x� JO x •s x x bv, O O c") z x 1 M r,-i cn >< o M z II rn � N N O I O ;u —�1 O rnO a� z $gig \, o \F 1 \ ----------- - - - - -- - - - - - -- x 177.30' N. 06' 36' 00" W. - - - -- � •�s ---------------------------------------- - - - - -- POLO DRIVE REVISIONS Y L DAiE £ � o CMK. R `rr. om �Zp9 o o r�N r � - DRAN';NG � JOb � C/] SEAL r CD c� H Hti O b @6p @6p ASE: p nag g F ajeyl 0� 99 Y xg ". � +O uYYid l6 3 ° LL --I Kin..* C d. gg 1 y a� �7 c w r Q o S C 1 0 A ry g 9 R m Z pgR lrn ® PN81mx�0 N � 5' �Bp 00 'ypa■ 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i�' � i� � _ � � �' a !� gBb�AA rn hpi CCCC x °z pC P E m Z cn M m 10 o CD o -n om �Zp9 o o r�N r � - DRAN';NG � JOb � C/] SEAL r CD c� H Hti O b @6p @6p ASE: p nag g F ajeyl 0� 99 Y om �Zp9 o o r�N r � - DRAN';NG � JOb � C/] SEAL r CD c� H Hti O b r� a i0 wFJ +O uYYid l6 3 ° LL --I Kin..* C d. 1 Eq. y a� �7 c w �o n 0 0 3 PN81mx�0 N � $ 00 n d� A 3 r� a� gg S; ".% R, - -n ono s - "S „” A c� �nogagn"� _ "Rq "9n " a "a "� ��; "a"' �o� ;�s;- .��Fq a cwo ,o83.ase _ 3""' °a °a" �'" a�q o�' <R�'iA gg oa » a ;s�3 n a %�� ^ 3g" " °Rw. " �3 u ^" ° °; °; " - °£�; �$� ;R '� o° ° �� ^" g;^ Q21„ � »� Asa §g° - r" g' , o wi " "S� - �d �, R. n o s �d °a .4 °�'hq 4 s4'�,;w;9s a "a's_ P'$;;' ^� » ^� 4 ��.apNa�goan +" a " ;$'�' "g" °o�$s"; 9± ' ,3$as $ ;-"s waaaa "� "n� a� »r���� ���; wgaaa$ " z " $ ^h „a a s�= � o,o�, ° 4 s °sg'>N ° o$ -�,eg wj »r �� a "°�a ,aa "sg ”" 3 "qR "4° "8a�3 ��s�oB'° �"° _ �� "_�� q✓; 9 wl.,", v. , wig SOS - _� �° nign $ °°w cSq� Y7iw1u - z�" Q " _.. r " °m .' i�x ivi$" "`g <o "a- aq- g: 4 gg R" dot €$�a� 39- :° =S R " sz3 =� :• =° ;�_" �; - °A 's"o °3� �o�z'Rag :R$ "a3o8n,» 9a?�u Via" _ � "°' a% a; _�n tea° '3° " >�.W � Q 4 1 w ° $$ ii•$ i �$ a�aq "a8 °g r3 m �" io;Ro91 x °�F as >F g', » - Q = "' "" ;� a$ °° ° , » _ �R; "� °��. °oa ""�> $�� $ ° "$ -.3 gam' �; _ ° "�a bra d ".9,a `A �mh43 g T H ": §2z "�o�- o sm a^ "� "° o °� " »a "3"g " „� aQ9� s� n °��aq € °$ "S�"Rug;ff$ °off ;” � a �_ _ ^� � ;0&3 '� "S ;9 aq°- �a9 ; $w? _ f4 R � 3 pg ''��q o Aga � d` 2gYw$�`��� od �?N a� s ,3 '$ - NHa�'m N�3; °�P - a �� oa° A°� a $. -' 4° 33n; a' °n° a�S :',r 3 »T. m _ a n " °ao - °a h�n u ii wa 04 NSo° �sr o°� ° �r u REVISIONS ° DAT [[L[LIA 0II IIN Ip NU1 LE I���IUUUlI11l�u� MOO[ 2m �j n aVST' in.- g I -Igfl RAP 2090 lip X T yr .Z] O Z z � N, m Z O S D m r= r � 6 �F CAA j 1 r ddN �E<r II N N II 11 n n n JC DOI'1C mCz £ A N 2 c n 2 + Z x 1 m�pc,S ti I� o� =prpey INVERT °x-I m a Z x m M tl z C �i C z p O x M y < + MM A a� zm am N vxM I sr x z iy m q C= - X I 'x' of -�I 3. a 0 Z °' 2m �j n aVST' in.- g I -Igfl RAP 2090 lip X T yr .Z] O Z z � N, m Z O S D m r= r � 6 �F CAA j 1 N W n n Ell X r ;:0 ➢ 70 m Z C7 o o �d zotg BRA- Q iza 2 s 0 N W n n Ell X r ;:0 ➢ 70 m Z C7 o o �d zotg 4• CD Z Z m m o m —I Z p m K K: CD Z TI m� D m � ➢ CD z y o z EI7 0 Z = p o0 m C-) All zm° r- n p Q m g� 4� y p; gs jig 7s p ao4• RUN a $ a.4 r O 4• � �pMINISTONCEXANLDL ALTERNATE WMACHINE / ' 1 a z EXCAVATION AND OVER INVERT °x-I C EXCAVATION FOR 'f -v -� sr _ 4 MAC MACHINE C= m I EXCA Z a K as S °v i iigo1° �z S o S2 M mF �i TOWN OF GULF STREAM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING REPORT Application #: 013 -07 Owner: M/M Nelson Grumney Address: 2960 Polo Drive Agent: Mark Marsh, Bridges, Marsh & Associates Proposed Improvement: Construct 540 SF single story additions to an existing two story Neo- French eclectic style dwelling. Approvals Requested: Special Exception (1) To permit the extension of the non - conforming south wall of the existing structure that encroaches a maximum of 1 foot into the south side setback, to add a master bedroom of approximately 302 SF to be located on the first floor. Special Exception (2) To permit the addition of the proposed 302 SF master bedroom to extend 20 feet into the 50 foot rear setback. Demolition Permit To allow small portion of the existing garage to be removed in order to realign the 2 car garage. Level 3 Architectural /Site Plan To permit the addition of a master bedroom, a small addition to the kitchen, a realignment of the 2 car garage and a new front entry, a net increase of 540 SF on the first floor of an existing partial two story Neo- French Eclectic single family dwelling. Gross Lot size: 18,519 SF Effective Lot Area: 17,996 SF Permitted Floor Area: 5,939 SF Proposed Total Floor Area: 5,425 SF Zoning District: RS -C: GS Core Proposed Height: Match existing Finished Floor Elevation: 9.33' Base Flood Elevation: 7.0' Adjacent Residences: Gulf Stream - Bermuda Considered During Review: Section 70 -75 Special exception setbacks Note: Standards of approval for both special exceptions are met. Section 70 -80 Landscaped open space Section 70 -100 Roof and Eave Heights; Section 70 -107 Additions and rehabilitations, and replacement of existing features Arc�.itectural Review and Planning Board ARPB File #013 -07 February 28, 2013 Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Motion to Recommend Approval of a Special Exception to permit the extension of the non- conforming south wall of the existing structure that encroaches a maximum of 1 foot into the south side setback, to add a master bedroom of approximately 302 SF to be located on the first floor. Motion to Recommend Approval of a Special Exception to permit the addition of the proposed 302 SF master bedroom to extend 20 feet into the 50 foot rear setback. Motion to Recommend Approval of a demolition permit to allow small portion of the existing garage to be removed in order to realign the 2 car garage. Motion to Recommend Approval of a Level 3 Architectural /Site Plan Review to permit the addition of a master bedroom, a small addition to the kitchen, a realignment of the 2 car garage and a new front entry, a net increase of 540 SF on the first floor of an existing partial two story Neo- French Eclectic single family dwelling based on a finding that the proposed construction meet the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards. ARPB Date: February 28, 2013 Action: Special Exception (1): Recommend approval as requested. (5 -0) Special Exception (2): Recommend approval as requested. (5 -0) Demolition Permit: Recommend approval as requested with final approval of any additional demolition of the garage being subject to staff review and approval. (5 -0) Level 3 Architectural /Site Plan Review: Recommend approval as requested and as staff recommendation. (5 -0) Town Commission: March 15, 2013 Action: Special Exception (1): Approved as recommended. (5 -0) Special Exception (2): Approved as recommended. (5 -0) Demolition Permit: Approved as recommended including the additional demolition of garage & kitchen wing. (5 -0) Level 3 Architectural/ Site Plan Review: Approved as recommended. (5 -0) Town of Gulf Stream TOWN OF GULF STREAM f J' APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL This form is to be used for all ,development review applications to be heard by the Town of Gulf Stream Architectural Review and Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, and/or Town Commission. To complete the form properly, please review the accompanying Town of Gulf Stream Instruction Manual for Application for Development Review Form. Failure to complete this form properly will delay its consideration. ARPB File # 15,0 PART II. GENERAL INFORMATION To be completed by all applicants. A. Project Information [.A. 1. Project/OwnerName: Mr -9 Mrs- Nelson Grumney, Jr I.A.2. Project Address: 2 9 6 0 Polo Dr , r„ 1 f St ream I.A.3. Project Property Legal Description: See attached I.A.4. Project Description (describe in detail, including # of stories, etc.) Proposed master bedroom addition, kitchen expansion and realignment of 2 car garage. I.A.5. Square' Footage of New Structure or Addition: Architectural Style: Neo— French F 1 t i r 1.A.6. Check all that apply: CXArchitectural /Site Plan Review ❑ Land Clearing O North Ocean Boulevard Overlay (complete section 8) ❑ Demolition of Structures ❑ Non - residential uses ❑ Variance (complete section G) N Special Exception (complete section F) lE 1.A.7. (a) Proposed F.F.E.: �* '5�q'S"• Type of Foundation: Piling B. Owner Information I.B.I. Owner Address: 2960 Polo Dr, Gulf Stream, FL I.B.2. Owner PhonE I.B.3. Owner Signa C. Agent Informatio.. I.C.1. Agent Name and Firm Name: Bridges, Marsh & Associates, Inc. I.C.2. Agent Address: 18 Via Mizner, Palm Beach, FL 33480 I.C.3. Agent Phone Number: (o) 8 3 —1 ^ 3 3 II Fax 1.C.4. Agent Siqnature: Pre -App Dale: App Date: Com Date: _ Decision: Off# al Use 17nly 'B ate: mendation: TC W ( "P2, 3!5'- /- Application for development Approval Form ADA.2000 revised 6/13/00 Page 2 Town of Gulf Stream PART III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION To be completed by all applicants after pre- application conference with Town Staff. Please be concise but brief. Attach additional sheets only when necessary and be sure to include the appropriate and complete question number for each response. A. Project Description and Justification III.A.1. In what zoning district is the project site located? Gulf Stream Code -Rs —C III.A.2. Is the project compatible with the intent of the zoning district? [X Yes ❑ No Explain. Proposed additions /expansions, are compatible in scale /mass of the zoning district. III.A.3. Is the project consistent with the Future Land Use Map and goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan? 6a Yes ❑ No Explain. Proposed modifications comply with all future requirements and are consistent with the future land use. III.A.4. How are ingress and egress to the property to be provided? Existing driveways III.A.5. How are the following utilities to be provided to the property? a. Stormwater Drainage on site. b. Sanitary Sewer sanitary system c. Potable Water city d. Irrigation Water city e. Electricity FP &L f. Telephone ATT g. Gas Florida Public Utilities h. Cable Television Comcast III.A.6. If the project involves the erection of one or more structures, please describe how the structures are consistent with the criteria in Section 66 -144 of the Town of Gulf Stream Code. (Attach additional sheet if necessary.) NO PART IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Section A is to be completed by all applicants after pre - application conference with Town staff. Answering "Yes" to any question in Section A requires the completion of additional Sections as indicated. A. Additional Approvals/Requirements IV.A.1. Does the project involve land area within fifty feet (50') of the Al (North Ocean Boulevard) right -of- way? ❑ Yes X[@ No (If "Yes ", section B of this part must be completed.) IV.A.2. Does the project involve the demolition of one or more structures? ARYes ❑ No (If "Yes ", section C of this part must be completed.) IV.A.3. Does the project involve the clearing or filling of any portion of an existing vacant lot or more than fifty percent (50 %) of the landscaped area of a developed lot? ❑ Yes 9R No (If "Yes ", section D of this part must be completed.) IV.A.5. Does the project require approval of a Special Exception? ARYes ❑ No (If "Yes ", section E of this part must be completed.) IV.A.6. Is the project at variance with any regulations contained in the Zoning Code? ❑ Yes IX No (If "Yes ", section G of this part must be completed.) Application for Development Approval Form ADA.32000 Page 3 Town of Gulf Strearn B. Projects Requiring North Ocean Boulevard Overlay Permit IV.B.1. What significant landscape features or architectural features are to be disturbed or added and to what extent? N/A IV.B.2. Describe the need and justification for the disturbance /addition: N/A IV.13.3. Will the disturbance /addition destroy or seriously impair visual relationships among buildings, landscape features and open space, or introduce incompatible landscape features or plant material that destroys or impairs significant views or vistas within the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District? Yes No Explain: _ N/A IV.B.4. How is the design consistent with the AM Landscape Enhancement Project? N/A IV.B.5. What.mitigation is proposed so that the disturbance /addition has the least impact possible to the visual and aesthetic quality of the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: N/A C. Projects Requiring a Demolition Permit IV.C.1. When are the existing structures to be demolished? Portions of the existing garage IV.C.2. When are the proposed structures to be constructed? Summer 2013 IV.C.3. What is the landmark status of the structures to be demolished? No D. Projects Requiring a Land Clearing Permit IV.D.1. Describe those vegetative materials of 8 inches in diameter and greater to be North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: N/A IV.D.2. Describe the need and justification for the removal /relocation: N/A IV.D.3. How is the removal from the project site of vegetation to be mitigated: N/A IV.D.4. How are the remaining and relocated vegetative materials to be protected and preserved during the land clearing and constriction activities and thereafter? N/A IV.D.5. What replacement materials are proposed? N/A Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 4 February 2002 .... vucdlll E. Projects Requiring a Special Exception. 70- 75(c)(1)(2) IV.E.1. Is the proposed use a permitted special exception use? ElYes ❑ No Code Section: 70 -75 (j ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) IV.E.2. How is the use designed, located and proposed to be operated so that the public health, safety, welfare, and morals will be protected? The proposed additions are located at the rear of the property and do not impact any R.O.W. exposures. IV.E.3. Will the use cause substantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood where it is to be located? ❑ Yes Flo Explain. The scale and design compliment the existing residence with no adverse impact to the neighborhood. IV.E.4. How will the use be compatible with adjoining development and the character of the District where it is to be located? same as above IV.E.5. What landscaping and screening are provided? All existing landscaping will be preserved at property lines, therefore all existing privacy buffering will remain. IV.E.6. Does the use conform with all applicable regulations governing the District wherein it is to be located? ❑ Yes [X No Explain. This residential use conforms to the District Regulations except that the proposed SW wing of the residence extends an existing non conforming sideyard setback and requires the use of a minimum rear setback for a waterfront lot in core district. F. Non - Residential Projects and Residential Projects of Greater than 2 Units 1, IV.F.1. If common area facilities are to be provided, describe them and how they are to be maintained. N/A IV.F.2. If recreation facilities are to be provided, describe them and their potential impacts on surrounding properties. N/A IV.F.3. For each of the following, list the number provided and their dimensions. Loading Spaces: N/A Standard Parking Spaces: Small Car Parking Spaces: Handicapped Parking Spaces: Driveways /Aisles: Application for Development Approval Form ADA.32000 Page c Town of Gulf Stream G. Projects Requiring a Variance (code Section 66 -150 through 157) IV.G.1. From what specific Zoning Code regulation is a variance requested? N/A IV.G.2. What does the Zoning Code require for this specific site? IV.G.3. What is proposed? IV.G.4. What is the total variance requested? IV.G.5. The following 8 mandatory variance findings from Section 66 -154, must be addressed: (Attach additional sheet if necessary.) (1) What specific conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, .or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district? (2) Did the special conditions and circumstances result from the actions of the applicant? Yes No (3) Will granting the variance confer upon the applicant.any special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Code to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? Yes No Explain: (4) How would a literal interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the same terms of the , ordinance and work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant? (5) Is the Variance requested the minimum variance that makes possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure? Yes No Explain: (6) Will granting the variance permit any prohibited use to be established or re- established: Yes No (7) Is the requested variance consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the future Land Use Map of the adopted Comprehensive Plan? Yes No (8) Will the variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Yes No Explain: Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 6 February 2002 uwn or uulf Stream H. Projects Requiring Rezoning IV.H.1. What is the Future Land Use designation of the project site? IV.H.2. If the project involves a rezoning, Zoning Code text change, Future Land Use Map change, Comprehensive Plan text change, or any combination thereof, please describe the need and justification for the request. PART V. OPTIONAL INFORMATION This entire Part is optional for all applicants. Applicants are encouraged, but not required, to provide any additional relevant information regarding the project that was not covered elsewhere on this form or on any of the other materials submitted with the application. Application for Development Approval Form ADA.2000 revised 6/8100 Page 7