HomeMy Public PortalAbout08.03.2022 City Council Meeting Packet Posted 07/29/2022 Page 1 of 1
AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL
Wednesday, August 3, 2022
7:00 P.M.
Medina City Hall
2052 County Road 24
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Minutes of the July 19, 2022 Work Session
B. Minutes of the July 19, 2022 Regular Council Meeting
V. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approve Resolution Accepting the Resignation of Officer Jeremiah Jessen and Authorize
Recruitment of Vacant Patrol Officer Position
B. Accept Donations for the 2022 Cops and Bobbers Program
VI. COMMENTS
A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda
B. Park Commission
C. Planning Commission
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. SH Ventures, Inc. Lifestyle Auto Condos PUD Concept Plan
B. City of Independence Quad Cities Sewer Agreement Request Discussion
VIII. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT
IX. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
X. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS
XI. ADJOURN
Meeting Rules of Conduct to Address
the City Council:
• Fill out & turn in comment card
• Give name and address
• Indicate if representing a group
• Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes
MEMORANDUM
TO: Medina Mayor and City Council
FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator
DATE OF REPORT: July 28, 2022
DATE OF MEETING: August 3, 2022
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report
V. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approve Resolution Accepting Resignation of Police Officer Jeremiah Jessen – Police
Officer Jeremiah Jessen has resigned from his position. His last day with the Medina
Police Department was July 17, 2022. Staff recommends approval of the resolution
accepting Jeremiah Jessen’s resignation and requests authorization to begin the
recruitment process to fill the vacant police officer position.
See attached memo and resolution.
B. Approve Resolution Accepting Donations for the 2022 Cops and Bobbers program –
Staff recommends approval of the resolution accepting donations for the 2022 Cops and
Bobbers program.
See attached memo and resolution.
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. SH Ventures, Inc. Lifestyle Auto Condos PUD Concept Plan - SH Ventures, Inc. has
requested review of a PUD Concept Plan for development of individually owned auto-
condos within 9 buildings with an aggregate footprint of approximately 218,740 square
feet. The subject site is south of Highway 55, west of Pioneer Trail. The purpose of a
PUD Concept Plan is to provide feedback to the applicant prior to a formal application.
Generally, the City Council does not take formal action and the feedback is purely
advisory.
B. City of Independence Quad Cities Sewer Agreement Request Discussion – Staff met with
Mark Kaltsas, Independence City Administrator, related to a request for additional sewer
units for a residential development south of Lake Independence, northwest of County
Road 19 and Perkinsville Road. Medina operates a sanitary sewer main along County
Road 19/County Road 29 into which the cities of Greenfield, Independence, and Loretto
discharge wastewater. The communities entered into the “Quad-City Agreement” to
describe the terms and conditions of utilizing and operating the system. The Quad-City
2
Agreement set a maximum number of units which communities would connect to
different portions of the system. Independence has requested an additional 26
connections for a new residential development south of Lake Independence. These units
would be in addition to 41 connections already allowed south of Lake Independence and
274 units from the north. Allowing the additional units will require a formal amendment
to the Quad-City Agreement, approved by all four cities. Staff is requesting Council
discussion and feedback on Independence’s request. Staff will then provide the feedback
from the Medina City Council to the City of Independence so they can decide how to
proceed with the development request.
X. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS
Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 006455E-006475E for $980,178.60,
and order check numbers 053205-053278 for $600,972.64, and payroll EFT 0512020-0512050
for $64,957.73.
INFORMATION PACKET:
• Planning Department Update
• Police Department Update
• Public Works Department Update
• Claims List
Medina City Council Work Session Minutes
July 19, 2022
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES OF
July 19, 2022
The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in work session on July 19, 2022, at 6:00 p.m. at the
Medina City Hall, 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN.
I. Call to Order
Members present: Martin, Albers, Cavanaugh, DesLauriers, Reid
Members absent: None
Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Clerk/Assistant to the City
Administrator Caitlyn Walker, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, Finance Director Erin
Barnhart, Public Safety Director Jason Nelson, Planning Director Dusty Finke,
II. 2023 Budget and CIP Discussion
Finance Director Erin Barnhart provided the City Council with an updated draft budget for 2023.
The budget discussion areas included the capital improvement plan (CIP) and updates to the
general fund budget. For the CIP, Barnhart shared that there has been a reorganization of some of
the road projects and the City may need to bond for the projects in 2023. Barnhart highlighted
that there will be continued discussion about the impact of inflation and increasing interest rates
on the CIP. Public Works Director Steve Scherer and Public Safety Director Jason Nelson
discussed how supply chain issues are impacting their ability to purchase equipment in the
appropriate CIP budget year. They requested approval to be able to purchase equipment that may
be paid for in a CIP year that has not been formally approved by the City Council. The Council
was supportive of this and asked that department heads send an email to Council Members when
the equipment becomes available to ensure Council Members are aware of the purchase. Council
requested the amount budgeted for the future fire station be increased.
Barnhart reviewed changes to the general fund. The updated budget includes the addition of a
full-time police officer. The budget also includes a proposed 1.5% market inflation in addition to
the 3.5% COLA increase in staff wages. The Council was supportive of this additional market
inflation increase. Staff will work with DDA in 2023 to update the 2021 compensation study,
review the Planning Director job description and the Finance Director job description. Barnhart
reviewed revised property tax scenarios and Council shared they are interested in keeping the tax
levy rate the same as last year and putting the additional revenue aside for the future fire fund.
Nelson gave an update on the Police Department’s strategy for recruitment and retention of staff.
Nelson shared that the labor market for Police Departments has never had so many openings.
Other agencies are offering extras such as hiring incentives and paying for continuing education
as part of their recruitment and retention strategy. In the past, the department has relied on the
benefits package as a strong incentive, however, many cities now have similar benefits packages.
Staff is brainstorming ideas and will continue to update the Council on new strategies.
III. Adjourn
Albers made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:00 p.m. on July 19, 2022. Cavanaugh
seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
July 19, 2022
1
DRAFT 1
2
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 19, 2022 3
4
The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on July 19, 2022 at 7:00 5
p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Martin presided. 6
7
I. ROLL CALL 8
9
Members present: Albers, Cavanaugh, DesLauriers, Martin, and Reid. 10
11
Members absent: None. 12
13
Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, Attorney Dave Anderson, Finance 14
Director Erin Barnhart, City Engineer Jim Stremel, City Planning Director Dusty Finke, 15
Public Works Director Steve Scherer, and Chief of Police Jason Nelson. 16
17
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:00 p.m.) 18
19
III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:00 p.m.) 20
The agenda was approved as presented. 21
22
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:00 p.m.) 23
24
A. Approval of the July 5, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 25
Martin noted that prior to the meeting, Johnson distributed proposed changes as 26
suggested by herself and Cavanaugh. 27
28
Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Martin, to approve the July 5, 2022 regular City 29
Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 30
31
V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:01 p.m.) 32
33
A. Resolution Approving Off-Site Gambling Permit for the Wayzata Youth 34
Hockey District #284 to Conduct Lawful Charitable Gambling at 3200 Mill 35
Street 36
B. Approve 2023 Residential Assessing Contract with Southwest Assessing 37
Services 38
C. Update Jeff Bursch’s Job Title from Seasonal to Part-Time Public Works 39
Maintenance Technician 40
D. Approve Resolution Granting Approval of the Cates Industrial 41
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Authorizing Submission to the 42
Metropolitan Council for Review 43
Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Reid, to approve the consent agenda. Motion 44
passed unanimously. 45
46
VI. COMMENTS (7:02 p.m.) 47
48
A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 49
There were none. 50
51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
July 19, 2022
2
B. Park Commission 1
Scherer stated that the July meeting of the Park Commission has been canceled. He 2
noted that the subcommittee for Lakeshore Park continues to work on a proposal. He 3
provided an update on the progress at Hunter Park. 4
5
C. Planning Commission 6
Planning Commissioner Popp reported that the Planning Commission met the previous 7
week to hold a public hearing to review a concept plan for SH Ventures that wishes to 8
develop auto condos on property currently zoned FDA. He stated that the City 9
previously reviewed a similar request from the applicant in the fall and was generally not 10
in favor. He noted that the applicant reduced the scale of the concept, but the 11
Commission still reached the same conclusion and did not support the proposal on this 12
property. 13
14
Martin thanked Popp and the Planning Commission for the great work it continues to do. 15
She referenced an approval to change the zoning of FDA on a different property, which 16
was on the consent agenda tonight, noting that property had a history and previous 17
agreement between the property owner and the City which helped to guide that decision. 18
19
Finke stated that while the property in question for the SH Ventures proposal was 20
previously guided to be included in the MUSA, there was not a similar agreement with 21
the property owner as mentioned by Martin. 22
23
VII. NEW BUSINESS 24
25
A. Willow Drive/TH 55 Regional Lift Station Project Discussion (7:09 p.m.) 26
Johnson stated that this item has been included in the Capital Improvement Plan for a 27
number of years and the lift station would serve properties east and west of Willow 28
Drive. He noted that this amenity would provide necessary service for the Cates 29
Industrial property as well as the Adam’s Pest Control property in addition to future 30
development. 31
32
Martin noted that it has been explained in the past that proceeding through design does 33
not mean construction will take place immediately and often those plans have a shelf 34
life. She asked that staff include that information in their presentation. 35
36
Stremel stated that the City completed a feasibility study in 2019 when the Adam’s Pest 37
Control site had some development plans and noted that work was further refined in the 38
2040 Comprehensive Plan process. He stated that this improvement would serve 39
properties both east and west of Willow Drive. He commented that this would be a good 40
time to proceed to final design, given the development interest in the area and time 41
needed to secure materials. He provided details on the area that would be served by 42
this lift station, identifying properties within that area that have the opportunity to be 43
served by gravity sewer. He stated that the feasibility study investigated a few options 44
and provided details on those options. 45
46
Albers asked the life expectancy of the pumps. 47
48
Scherer explained that would be based on the usage rather than the age. He confirmed 49
that a smaller pump would run a lot more than a larger pump, noting the larger pump 50
may pump a few times a week versus a few times per day. 51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
July 19, 2022
3
1
Stremel stated that the funding would come from the sewer capital fund for these 2
improvements. He provided details on a potential schedule, if the action is approved by 3
the Council tonight, as well as the shelf life of the design documents. He stated that it 4
could take up to eight months to obtain some of the equipment/materials once ordered. 5
He stated that staff will monitor the progress of development for the sites in this area as 6
they proceed with design. 7
8
DesLauriers asked if this proposed project were pushed to 2024 for construction, would 9
that impact the development of the Adam’s Pest Control site. 10
11
Scherer stated that development of that site could occur simultaneously with the lift 12
station. 13
14
Stremel confirmed that site could be developed while this is proceeding. 15
16
Finke stated that staff has had a lot of discussion about this and will continue to have 17
discussions with developers and property owners before delving into the design. He 18
noted that ideally, they would like to align the construction of the lift station with the 19
construction of these sites. 20
21
Cavanaugh asked if the City would have the desired level of comfort related to the 22
donation of the land prior to spending the money on the plans. 23
24
Finke stated that they will be monitoring some level of risk on the design work, as the 25
land will not be fully owned by the City until the Cates project goes through the 26
entitlement stages. 27
28
Albers asked if there is a timeline for the Adam’s project. 29
30
Finke stated that applicant has plans to submit final plat this fall and begin on 31
construction in 2023. 32
33
DesLauriers asked if this expense were approved, would that be part of the estimated 34
costs reflected in the CIP. 35
36
Barnhart replied that could be considered as part of the overall CIP budget line item for 37
2022. 38
39
Stremel stated that the estimated cost within his presentation includes the design of 40
plans, construction and contingency as updated for the current market compared to the 41
estimates from 2019. 42
43
Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Albers, to approve the proposal from WSB and 44
authorize final design and bidding services in the amount of $73,504. Motion passed 45
unanimously. 46
47
VIII. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (7:28 p.m.) 48
Johnson stated that the next meeting will be held on Wednesday, August 3rd as Night to 49
Unite takes place on August 2nd. He encouraged the Council to advise Chief Nelson if 50
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
July 19, 2022
4
they would like to ride along with the police to the different community parties. He 1
reported that Cops and Bobbers took place today. 2
3
Nelson reported that event occurred this morning and had a great turnout with a lot of 4
kids. He noted that many of the kids had not caught a fish before, which was exciting. 5
6
IX. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (7:32 p.m.) 7
DesLauriers reported that there was a great turnout for the Fox 9 Town Ball event at 8
Fortin Field. He noted that he also attended the rodeo event, which was well attended, 9
and the parade was great as well. 10
11
Martin also commented on her experiences at the rodeo, recognizing the families that 12
donate towards the event. She noted Medina Celebration Day is scheduled for 13
September 17th. She advised of upcoming meetings that she will attend in the next few 14
weeks. 15
16
Albers advised of a meeting in November he will miss due to travel. 17
18
X. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (7:36 p.m.) 19
Moved by Martin, seconded by Cavanaugh, to approve the bills, EFT 006439E-006454E 20
for $85,945.92, order check numbers 053150-053204 for $410,963.42, and payroll EFT 21
0511983-0512019 for $61,211.19. Motion passed unanimously. 22
23
XI. ADJOURN 24
Moved by Albers, seconded by Cavanaugh, to adjourn the meeting at 7:37 p.m. Motion 25
passed unanimously. 26
27
28
__________________________________ 29
Kathy Martin, Mayor 30
Attest: 31
32
____________________________________ 33
Scott Johnson, City Administrator 34
TO: Mayor Kathleen Martin and Medina City Council
FROM: Director Jason Nelson
DATE: July 28, 2022
RE: Resignation Letter from Officer Jeremiah Jessen
Background
On July 15, 2022, I received a resignation letter from Officer Jeremiah Jessen. Officer Jessen has advised
me that he has accepted a position with the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office starting on July 17, 2022.
Officer Jessen has been with the department for 15 years with the last five being assigned to investigations.
Attached to this memo is Officer Jessen’s resignation letter.
Recommendation:
I request the City Council approve a motion to accept Officer Jeremiah Jessen’s resignation from his
position as patrol officer with the City of Medina effective July 17, 2022 and authorize immediate
hiring to fill this position.
Agenda Item #5A
Resolution No. 2022-
August 3, 2022
Member ____ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING RESIGNATION OF
POLICE OFFICER JEREMIAH JESSEN
WHEREAS, Jeremiah Jessen began employment with the City of Medina as a Police Officer
in the Police Department on July 9, 2007; and
WHEREAS, on July 15, 2022, Jessen submitted a letter of resignation from his position
addressed to the Public Safety Director; and
WHEREAS, Jeremiah Jessen’s resignation from his position is effective July 17, 2022.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that
Jeremiah Jessen’s letter of resignation is hereby accepted.
Dated: August 3, 2022.
______________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ______
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
July 3rd, 2022
RECEIVED
JUL 15 2022
Chief Nelson,
I am writing to inform you of my resignation from the City of Medina Police Department
effective 07/17/2022. If my hire/start date with the HCSO is affected in any way I'd like the
right to rescind this two week notice.
My 15 years of employment with the Medina PD has been memorable and will always be a
special part of my career in Law Enforcement. I want to thank you personally for all the support
over the years. No matter the circumstances, I always knew you had my back. I wish you and
the Medina Police Department nothing but continued success in the future.
Jeremiah Jessen #112
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Director Jason Nelson
DATE: July 28, 2022
RE: Donation – Cops ‘n Bobbers
Below is a list of money/items/attendance donated for Cops ‘n Bobbers:
Northwest Area Jaycees - $2,000
Hamel Lions - $1,000
Loretto Lions – $2,000
Process Display - $500, banners, and one employee
Clam Corp – Misc. Fishing Tackle and Equipment, shirts, Boat with two employees
Scheels – Fishing Rods
Cabin Fever Sporting Goods – Fishing Equipment (line and bobbers)
Bay to Bay Boat Club – Boat Rental (2)
Koch’s Korner – Fishing Bait
OAK Eatery - Lunches
I would ask the Medina City Council to accept the donations for Cops ‘n Bobbers and direct staff to
respond with a thank you letter to each contributor.
Agenda Item #5B
Resolution No. 2022-XX 1
August 3, 2022
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATIONS FOR THE 2022 COPS AND BOBBERS
PROGRAM
WHEREAS, The donors listed on Exhibit A (the “Donors”) have generously offered to
donate the money and items listed on Exhibit A (the “Donation”) to the City of Medina (the
“City”); and
WHEREAS, the Donations will be dedicated to pay for the 2022 Cops and Bobbers
program; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to accept the Donations and express its gratitude to the
Donors for their generosity.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina,
Minnesota that the City accepts the Donations and thanks the Donors.
Dated: August 3, 2022.
____________________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2022-XX 2
August 3, 2022
Exhibit A
Donations
BUSINESSES DONATION
Northwest Area Jaycees $2000
Hamel Lions $1000
Loretto Lions $2000
Process Display $500, banners, and one employee
Clam Corp
Misc. fishing tackle and equipment, shirts, boat with two
employees
Scheels Fishing rods
Cabin Fever Sporting Goods Fishing equipment (line and bobbers)
Bay to Bay Boat Club Boat rental (2)
Koch’s Korner Fishing bait
OAK Eatery Lunches
SH Ventures – Lifestyle Auto Condos Page 1 of 11 August 3, 2022
PUD Concept Plan City Council Meeting
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: July 28 2022
MEETING: August 3, 2022 City Council
SUBJECT: SH Ventures, Inc. – PID 05-118-23-22-0005 – Lifestyle Auto Condos –
PUD Concept Plan – south of Hwy 55, west of Pioneer Tr.
Summary of Request
SH Ventures, Inc. has requested review of a PUD Concept Plan for development of individually
owned auto-condos within 9 buildings with an aggregate footprint of approximately 218,740
square feet. The subject site is south of Highway 55, west of Pioneer Trail. An aerial of the site
and surrounding property can be found below.
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item #7A
SH Ventures – Lifestyle Auto Condos Page 2 of 11 August 3, 2022
PUD Concept Plan City Council Meeting
The subject site is currently farmed. There are wetlands located along the western property line
and in the southeast of the site. Existing Rural Residential homes are located to the east and
southeast. Property to the west is currently farmed and designated as Future Development Area.
The City of Corcoran is north of Highway 55, with the property to the northwest being zoned
industrial.
The Planning Commission and City Council provided comments during the fall of 2021 on a
concept plan with 12 buildings that proposed a total footprint of 258,000 square feet. Excerpts
from those discussions is attached for reference. Generally, feedback did not find the planned
unit development consistent with the objectives of the Future Development Area and
Comprehensive Plan.
Comprehensive Plan/Zoning
The subject site is designated as Future Development Area (FDA) in the Comprehensive Plan
and zoned Rural Residential-Urban Reserve (RR-UR). The applicant is proposing a rezoning to
Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for the development.
Staff has prepared a summary of relevant definitions, goals, principles, and objectives from the
Comprehensive Plan and the RR-UR and Rural Business Holding (RBH) zoning districts, which
is attached.
Staff has included some of the most pertinent information here as well.
The FDA land use is defined in the Comprehensive Plan as follows:
Future Development Area (FDA) identifies areas which could potentially be planned for future urban development in the City that will be provided municipal sewer and water services. This area will remain rural unless and until designated for urban services in a future Comprehensive Plan update. The purpose of the FDA designation is to communicate the future planning intentions to the community. This designation is tentative and depends greatly on future infrastructure improvements, including to regional highway capacity.
The following objectives of the Rural Residential/FDA land uses appear most relevant: 13. Protect property within the Future Development Area designation from subdivision and development by requiring ghost plats for subdivisions so that future urban expansion is not compromised. 8. Maintain a maximum density of one unit per ten acres for new development in the Rural Residential and Future Development Area land use. 5. Allow land uses, such as home-based businesses, hobby farms, horse stables, nurseries, and other smaller-scale rural activities, which will not conflict with adjoining residential development. 6. Regulate noise, illumination, animals, and odors as needed to maintain public health and safety. 14. Reduce impervious surfaces where possible by applying low impact design standards and encourage innovative materials and plans that reduce runoff.
The City currently zones all property within the FDA land use as RR-UR. The Planning
Commission and City Council could discuss whether the objectives of the Comp Plan support
allowing limited business uses in the FDA land use prior to the time the area can be developed
with urban services.
SH Ventures – Lifestyle Auto Condos Page 3 of 11 August 3, 2022
PUD Concept Plan City Council Meeting
It may be reasonable to find that allowing business development in the FDA is contrary to
several of the objectives. Staff is especially concerned with the possibility that development
upon FDA property will cause unforeseen issues with future infrastructure and land use planning.
Improvements may inadvertently interfere with logical street and utility layouts in the future.
Opportunities may be lost to secure rights-of-way, easements, parkland and trail corridors, and
similar requirements which may be necessary to support nearby developments depending on the
ultimate uses. Staff also is hesitant to encourage new non-residential accesses onto Highway 55.
These reasons are why staff originally recommended the RR-UR zoning district for FDA
property.
However, it could also be argued for the City to allow limited business development within the
FDA land use, especially on property with good access to an arterial roadway (but not directly to
Highway 55). Extension of urban services may be decades in the future, and this would provide
an opportunity for a more intensive use in the interim.
PUD Concept Plan
The purpose of a PUD Concept Plan is to provide feedback to the applicant prior to a formal
application. Generally, the City Council does not take any formal action and the feedback is
purely advisory.
Purpose of a Planned Unit Development
According to Section 827.25, PUD provisions are established to provide comprehensive
procedures and standards designed to allow greater flexibility in the development of
neighborhoods and/or nonresidential areas by incorporating design modifications and allowing
for a mixture of uses. The PUD process, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this
Code related to setbacks, lot area, width and depth, yards, and other development standards is
intended to encourage:
1. Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic
expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design, and placement of structures and by the
conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments.
2. Higher standards of site and building design.
3. The preservation, enhancement, or restoration of desirable site characteristics such as high quality
natural resources, wooded areas, wetlands, natural topography and geologic features and the
prevention of soil erosion.
4. Innovative approaches to stormwater management and low-impact development practices which
result in volume control and improvement to water quality beyond the standard requirements of
the City.
5. Maintenance of open space in portions of the development site, preferably linked to surrounding
open space areas, and also enhanced buffering from adjacent roadways and lower intensity uses.
6. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly
development and use pattern and more convenience in location and design of development and
service facilities.
7. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lower
development costs and public investments.
8. A development pattern that effectuates the objectives of the Medina Comprehensive Plan. (PUD is
not intended as a means to vary applicable planning and zoning principles.)
9. A more desirable and creative environment than might be possible through the strict application on
zoning and subdivision regulations of the City.
SH Ventures – Lifestyle Auto Condos Page 4 of 11 August 3, 2022
PUD Concept Plan City Council Meeting
Usually, PUD requests have similar use/density as the existing zoning designation and use the
existing zoning as an “underlying” or “base” zoning. The City then determines whether the
development made possible through the PUD better meets City goals and objectives than a
development which meets the strict letter of the underlying district. The alternative is that the
developer proceeds with what is allowed with the standard zoning.
This request is a little bit different. The existing RR-UR zoning district would permit just a few
rural homes and would not permit non-residential uses such as auto-condos. Some type of
rezoning would be necessary to allow for any use beyond agriculture and a few rural homesites.
The City has a great deal of discretion when considering the PUD.
Proposed Site Layout
The following table summarizes the proposed development compared to the requirements of the
Rural Business Holding (RBH) zoning district. As noted above, in other PUDs, staff
recommends that the Planning Commission and City Council compare the requirements of the
underlying district.
However, staff does not believe comparing the proposed PUD to the specific dimensional
standards of the RR-UR district is sufficient in this case. Staff believes a comparison to a district
which allows business uses would be helpful. The RBH zoning district is intended to apply to
property which is planned for Business development (generally within the 20-year Comp Plan
timeframe), but which has not yet been developed with utilities.
Proposed RR-UR Require. RBH Requirement
Minimum Lot Size 35 acres 20 acres/home 20 acres
Minimum Lot Width 1023 feet 300 feet 200 feet
Minimum Lot Depth 1229 feet 200 feet 200 feet
Front Setback 35 feet 50 feet 50 feet
Side/Rear Setback 100 feet (east)
200 feet (south)
50 feet (west)
50 feet 30 feet
Residential Setback 100 feet (east)
200 feet (south)
50 feet (west)
75’ from comm. 100 feet
75’ w/ 70% screen
Parking Setbacks
Front Yard 40 feet 35 feet
Side/Rear 100 feet (east)
100 feet (west)
125 feet (south)
20 feet
Residential 100 feet (east)
100 feet (west)
125 feet (south)
75 feet
50’ w/ 70% screen
Building Height 24 feet 40 feet 30 feet
Hardcover 42.7% 20%-30% 60% (50% of suit. soils)
SH Ventures – Lifestyle Auto Condos Page 5 of 11 August 3, 2022
PUD Concept Plan City Council Meeting
Limitation on Sanitary Sewer Usage
The RBH zoning district includes a limitation of sanitary sewage usage to a rate of 100 gallons
per day, per net acre, which would be approximately 3000 gallons/day for the subject site, or
approximately 11 SAC units. Generally, the City uses Met Council calculations for SAC units,
but adjusted the amount for this use based on data provided by the AutoMotorPlex. The City’s
calculation is 1 unit per 17,500 square feet + .08 SAC unit per condo. Using this calculation, the
RBH district requirement would limit this site to a footprint of approximately 73,000 square feet
(110,000 square feet including mezzanine) with 53 condos.
The applicant is proposing buildings with a footprint of 218,740 square feet, plus mezzanines,
potentially another 50% of the footprint for a potential total floor area of 328,110 sq. ft. with
approximately 165 condos. This would equate to approximately 32 SAC units proposed. The
previous concept had been approximately 37 SAC units.
Architectural Design
Conceptual building elevations are attached for review. The proposed buildings are 80’ wide
rectangles with transparent overhead doors along the long sides of the structures for each unit.
Beyond the transparent overhead doors and windows, information is not provided on proposed
exterior material mix. The applicant has indicated that the architectural design is conceptual, and
they are open to recommendations from the Planning Commission and City Council in terms of
preferred materials and design.
The following are requirements of the RBH zoning district for context. Flexibility to the
standards may be provided or higher standards required as part of the PUD process.
Building Materials
The RBH district requires: “all
exterior building materials shall be
durable and meet the following
standards:
(a) A minimum of 20 percent of the building exterior shall be brick, natural stone, stucco (not
Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product), copper, or glass.
(b) A maximum of 80 percent of the exterior building materials may be decorative concrete, split
face (rock face) decorative block, or decorative pre-cast concrete panels. For buildings with
a floor area of 12,000 square feet or less, a maximum of 80 percent of the exterior building
materials may be commercial grade fiber cement lap siding installed per manufacturer’s
specifications. For buildings with a floor area of greater than 12,000 square feet, a maximum
of 20 percent of the exterior building materials may be commercial grade fiber cement lap
siding installed per manufacturer’s specifications. Concrete and fiber cement materials shall
be color impregnated in earth tones (rather than painted) and decorative concrete shall be
patterned to create a high quality terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine appearance.
(c) A maximum of 20 percent of the exterior building materials may be wood, metal (excluding
copper), or Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product, if used as accent
materials which are integrated into the overall building design.
Building Modulation – minimum of one element per 100 linear feet of façade.
Materials Required
Glass, stone, brick, stucco Minimum 20%
Concrete, (fiber cement if building <12,000 s.f.) Maximum 80%
Metal, EIFS, fiber cement Maximum 20%
SH Ventures – Lifestyle Auto Condos Page 6 of 11 August 3, 2022
PUD Concept Plan City Council Meeting
Fenestration/Transparency – “Building elevations which face a public street shall include generous
window coverage.”
Multi-sided Architecture – “Any rear or side building elevation which faces a public street or a
residential zoning district shall include design and architectural elements of a quality generally
associated with a front façade.”
Tree Preservation, Buffer Yard and Landscaping
Very few trees are located on the subject site. The applicant has submitted conceptual
landscaping plans.
The business districts include the following landscape requirements:
• Building Setting - At least 12 feet of landscaped area shall be provided adjacent to all
buildings except for walks, plaza space and approved loading docks. Walks within this
landscaped area shall be limited to where practically necessary to serve access points of
buildings
The applicant proposes landscaping areas at the ends of the buildings where no garage doors will
be located. The standard landscaping language would also require landscaping within the areas
along the long fronts of the buildings between doors, but the applicant does not propose
landscaping along the long sides of the buildings.
• Minimum Planting
Requirement Required Proposed
Overstory trees 1 per 50’ site perimeter 92 trees 224 trees
Ornamental trees 1 per 100’ site perimeter 46 trees 53 trees
Shrubs 1 per 30’ site perimeter 153 shrubs 315 shrubs
• Parking lot landscaping – minimum of 8% of parking lot area
Staff believes landscaping within the drive aisle areas and between buildings should be
maximized to soften and break up the appearance of hardcover and massing of the
structures.
• Landscaping islands every 20 spaces, wider separations for cells of 120 spaces
• Buffering. Landscaping is required to have an opacity of 50% adjacent to residential
zoning districts.
A landscaping screen with a minimum opacity of 0.5 adjacent to residential zoning districts
and allow a reduction of setbacks with a screen of 0.7. Staff would recommend substantial
perimeter landscaping.
Wetlands and Floodplain
The applicant has completed a wetland delineation, which identified wetlands along the western
portion of the site and also in the southeast corner of the site. The concept plan contemplates
impacts to the southeast wetland and the proposed right-of-way location would necessitate
impacts for construction of a roadway. Staff would recommend adjusting the site layout to
SH Ventures – Lifestyle Auto Condos Page 7 of 11 August 3, 2022
PUD Concept Plan City Council Meeting
eliminate impacts from the development. Based upon transportation planning, some impact for
roadways may be necessary.
Any development would be subject to establishment of upland buffers adjacent to the wetlands
on the site. Buffer width would be based upon the MnRAM assessment of the wetlands, but
likely 30’ or narrower. The applicant has indicated a 30’ buffer on the site plan. Staff would
recommend adjustments to the site layout to accommodate required buffers.
No floodplain areas are identified on FEMA maps upon the property.
Transportation/Parking
The applicant proposes to construct an access to Pioneer Trail. The proposed access would be
located just north of the existing shared driveway for the homes to the east of the site. The
original concept proposed direct access to Highway 55. Staff generally recommends against
creating new accesses to Highway 55, if at all possible.
If the City were to consider allowing more intensive uses within the FDA area along Highway
55, staff believes it may be beneficial to prioritize properties with the best access options first.
For example, properties along County Road 19 would have less impactful options for access and
could begin a system of frontage/backage roads which could be extended to other properties.
County Road 19 is constructed to handle trucks and more traffic volume then roadways such as
Pioneer Trail and Townline Road.
If the City were to rezone the property and permit more intensive development, staff believes it
is imperative that careful consideration be given to the layout so that improvements do not have
detrimental impact on infrastructure planning. Staff would recommend against any development
which does not provide flexibility in terms of right-of-way for future roadways. The applicant
has proposed providing right-of-way along the north of the property for a potential future
frontage road. Staff questions if this is the best option. A backage road along the southern
property line might provide more opportunity to serve lots fronting Highway 55 and also the
properties to the south in the future. It would align for an intersection at County Road 19 which
provides more separation from Highway 55.
Without knowing when and how other development may be planned in the area, staff believes
that requiring right-of-way along both the north and south of the property would provide the
most flexibility and would best
overcome the risks of allowing
premature development which may
impact future City infrastructure
planning.
The concept plan does not provide
right-of-way for expansion of
Highway 55. Staff would recommend
coordinating with MnDOT to
determine appropriate width of state
and city ROW along the north.
SH Ventures – Lifestyle Auto Condos Page 8 of 11 August 3, 2022
PUD Concept Plan City Council Meeting
Events
Staff recommends specific information and limitations on events if a formal application is to
proceed. Traffic and sewage usage would peak for car shows and other events well beyond the
day-to-day expected usage. With the limited infrastructure in the area, it will be important that
events are regulated.
Sewer/Water (Septic-Well)
No sewer or water infrastructure is located within a mile of the property and is not planned with
in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
The applicant proposes private shared septic and well systems. The applicant has indicated that a
series of primary and alternate septic locations could be located in the northeast corner of the site
and provided soil borings for these sites. As proposed, each building would have its own
drainfield, although tank locations do not appear to be specified. It will be important that any
septic be designed carefully based on anticipated sewage output and that care be taken for what
waste is put into the system since they are proposed to be shared.
The City’s experience with the AutoMotorPlex has indicated that private auto condos do use a
comparatively low amount of water per square foot. Any formal submittal would need to provide
information to verify compliance with septic regulations. Staff believes it would be important to
implement separate holding tanks or some other design for floor drains to protect the septic
drainfields.
No water service would be available for fire protection. The structures would need to be
sprinkled and supplied by a reservoir to provide adequate sprinkler flow. The applicant has
consulted with a fire suppression consultant, who projected a 24,000-36,000 gallon reservoir
would be required, depending on design. The fire department could not supplement the fire
suppression system through hydrants and would need to rely on tankers.
The RBH district requires connection to the municipal sewer and water system when service is
available. The applicant should provide an implementation plan for connection to sewer and
water and determine how financial guarantees will be established for the cost of transition and
payment of relevant fees.
Stormwater/Grading Review
No information is provided related to grading or stormwater management. Any future
development would be subject to relevant City and Pioneer/Sarah Creek regulations. Location
for potential stormwater ponds are indicated on the concept plan.
Park/Trails/Multi-Modal
While the City’s park and trail plans do not identify improvements in the area of the subject site,
this is because the Comprehensive Plan does not anticipate development in the area within the
planning horizon. Similar to the discussion related to transportation, staff believes it is important
that the City not miss opportunities or paint itself into a corner by allowing a development which
does not provide provisions for future park and trail improvements.
SH Ventures – Lifestyle Auto Condos Page 9 of 11 August 3, 2022
PUD Concept Plan City Council Meeting
In the future, if adjacent FDA properties are planned for development on urban services, there
will be a need for park and trail improvements. Staff believes the reservation of land for parks
and trails in the future serves the purposes of the PUD ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
Trails
If the develop were to proceed, staff would recommend trail easements effectively around the
perimeter of the site. The objective would be to provide the potential for future connections to
all adjoining properties and rights-of-way. Staff believes this type of flexibility is important for
properties that develop early in the FDA land use since the City does not know what surrounding
land uses will be when property develops in the future.
Parks
The City’s general goal is to have a park no more than ½ mile of planned residential
developments. As noted previously, the City has not yet planned future uses within the FDA, so
applying the ½ mile goal is difficult. Like other infrastructure, staff recommends approaching
parkland needs conservatively.
The FDA area north of Loretto is approximately 1.2 miles x 0.5 mile. There is also additional
FDA to the west of Loretto. This area suggests it would likely require a minimum of 2 parks in
the area to meet the ½ mile goal. The map below shows this area.
The Park Commission recommended that the City require expansive trail easements to provide
the most flexibility for future connections. The Commission did not recommend requiring land
for a future park, noting subject site is near the edge of the FDA and is proposing a non-
residential use. These factors suggest it may make sense to push the search area for a future park
further west.
Legend
Subject Site
½ mile park radius
SH Ventures – Lifestyle Auto Condos Page 10 of 11 August 3, 2022
PUD Concept Plan City Council Meeting
Review Criteria/Staff Comments
The City has a great deal of discretion when reviewing a PUD because it is a rezoning, which is a
legislative action. A PUD should only be approved if it achieves the purposes of the PUD
district (described on page 3), the Comprehensive Plan, and other City policies.
The PUD process allows flexibility to the general zoning standards to result in a more desirable
development than would be expected through strict adherence to the requirements, which in this
case are the RBH requirements. The process provides flexibility which is ultimately at the
discretion of the City. Such flexibility often cuts in both directions, certain aspects of the
development may not meet the general standards while other exceed minimum standards. The
flexibility provides the opportunity for collaboration in site design because the City can request
adjustments which may be seen as preferred, but would not be required under general standards.
Staff believes a general discussion about whether the City wants to encourage development
within the FDA may be a good starting point of discussion. Staff believes it is reasonable to
assume that any development in the area may likely encourage development interest on other
similar properties. The FDA objectives and requirements of the RR-UR and RBH district all
speak to limiting the scale and intensity of development in order to not interfere with future
planning and implementation and allow potential redevelopment in the future. The proposed
project has a significant amount of owners (165 condos) who would make a significant
investment in their units. As such, the use is likely fairly permanent. This suggests that
provisions for flexibility on future land and infrastructure planning is extremely important if the
project were to move forward.
If the Planning Commission and Council believes the proposed PUD meets the objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan and purpose of the PUD district, staff would strongly recommend that the
site layout provide substantial flexibility for future infrastructure planning, including streets,
utilities, and parks and trails. Doing so serves PUD purpose, including “encouraging a phased
and orderly development and use pattern” and “resulting in smaller networks of utilities and
streets thereby lower development costs and public investments.”
Staff has provided comments throughout the report to be incorporated into any future formal
application. These comments are summarized below:
1) Provisions shall be included in plans for future infrastructure including streets, utilities,
parks and trails.
2) The applicant shall submit evidence of adequate water supply for fire protection and
adequate provisions for sewage treatment.
3) Future application shall include sewage treatment system design to confirm long-term
viability of the system and compliance with relevant requirements.
4) The applicant shall provide an implementation plan to connect the facility to municipal
sewer and water systems when available.
5) Site layout shall be updated to provide additional setback and buffering to the west.
6) Information on proposed events shall be provided upon formal application and
appropriate limitations and regulations shall be required.
7) Street improvements shall either be constructed or financially secured for street
determined necessary by the City from Pioneer Trail to the western property line.
SH Ventures – Lifestyle Auto Condos Page 11 of 11 August 3, 2022
PUD Concept Plan City Council Meeting
8) Site layout shall be adjusted to eliminate wetland impacts and to accommodate required
upland buffers.
9) Additional landscaping shall be provided adjacent to and between buildings.
10) Right-of-way shall be provided for future expansion of Highway 55 and for future City
street network.
11) Except as explicitly noted within the Planned Unit Development, future applications shall
abide by relevant City requirements.
Planning Commission Review
The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the July 12 meeting and an excerpt from the
draft meeting minutes is attached. Seven people spoke at the public hearing, generally in
opposition to the proposed concept and raising concerns related to traffic on Pioneer Trail.
Planning Commissioners generally commented that the proposed concept did not seem
consistent with the purpose of the Future Development Area or the nearby residential properties.
Commissioners spoke of the importance of the FDA to try to prevent issues with future planning
and that this development seems contrary to that goal. Commissioners noted that they do not
believe the PUD would serve the purpose and objectives of the City.
Council Action Requested
The purpose of the PUD Concept Plan is to provide purely advisory comments to the applicant
for their consideration whether and how to continue with a formal application. The Council is
encouraged to provide feedback, but no formal action will be taken.
Attachments
1. Comp Plan Info
2. Excerpt from 7/12/2022 Planning Commission minutes
3. Excerpt from 10/20/2021 Park Commission minutes
4. Excerpt from 11/16/2021 City Council minutes
5. Applicant narrative and supporting documentation
6. Concept Plan
7. Conceptual architectural design
EXCERPTS FROM COMP PLAN AND ZONING CODE
Chapter 2: VISION & COMMUNITY GOALS
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
The Vision and Community Goals chapter is the heart of the Comprehensive Plan and provides
the foundation from which City officials make consistent and supporting land use decisions. This
chapter includes a set of general community goals that guided the creation of this Plan.
The concepts in this chapter are some of the few static elements of the Comprehensive Plan. If land
uses change or other infrastructure varies from the Plan, decisions will be founded in the goals set
forth below. The Vision and Goals were created with the involvement of the Comprehensive Plan
Steering Committee (the “Steering Committee”), City officials, and residents of Medina and are
broadly supported.
Land use designations are subject to strong social and economic pressures to change. Accordingly,
it is appropriate that such systems be periodically evaluated in light of changing social and
economic conditions. As development evolves, the Vision and Goals will provide the guidance for
accomplishing the vision for the future of the community even when changes are necessary to the
land use plan.
Detailed objectives and recommendations are contained within each of the subject chapters of this
plan.
Creating the Vision and Goals
The residents, the Steering Committee, City officials and staff participated in the planning process
for the Plan. A series of public participation meetings were conducted to introduce and solicit
information from the residents of Medina. The Steering Committee held work sessions that
focused on integrating the concerns and desires of the community together with accommodating
growth and regional impacts. An online forum provided additional opportunity for residents to
impact the Vision and Community Goals as they were formulated.
In addition to land use and growth planning, the City implemented open space, natural resources,
and infrastructure planning. The goals which guided this process are integrated into this chapter.
Each element of this plan was developed with assistance from city officials and a diverse group of
community stakeholders producing a truly representative plan. The City made a conscious
decision to emphasize natural resources and open space conservation.
Community Vision
The following statement provides a vision of the community for the future and the
resultant goals and strategies.
Medina is a community united by a common goal: to sustain and enhance the quality of life of its
residents. Medina will protect its significant natural resources and open space throughout the City,
while honoring its rural heritage and fostering safe and well-designed neighborhoods, places of recreation
and destinations for citizens to gather. Development within the City will be commensurate with
available transportation systems, municipal services and school capacity.
Community Goals
The following Community Goals are derived from the Vision Statement and inform
objectives and strategies throughout the various aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
• Preserve rural vistas, open spaces, and wetlands in all parts of the community
to promote the rural character of Medina.
• Protect and enhance the environment and natural resources throughout the community.
• Encourage and incent innovative and environmentally friendly approaches to
planning, engineering and development.
• Expand urban services only as necessary to accommodate regionally forecasted
residential growth, desired business opportunities and achievement of other
Community Goals. Such development and growth shall be at a sustainable pace
proportionate with capacity of schools and transportation, water supply and
wastewater infrastructure available to the City.
• Spread development so that it is not geographically concentrated during
particular timeframes.
• Promote public and private gathering places and civic events that serve the
entire community.
• Preserve and expand trails and parks to provide community recreational facilities,
connect neighborhoods, and encourage healthy lifestyles of its residents.
• Provide opportunities for a diversity of housing at a range of costs to support
residents at all stages of their lives.
• Encourage an attractive, vibrant business community that complements the
residential areas of the City.
• Maintain its commitment to public safety through support of the City’s
police department and coordinate with its contracted volunteer fire
departments.
• Manage the City through prudent budgeting processes, retaining a skilled and
efficient staff and long-range planning and financial management.
Future Land Use Plan Principles
The Future Land Use Plan guides the development of Medina through 2040, and will be used
to implement the City’s goals, strategies and policies. The Plan is guided by the Vision and
Community Goals as furthered by the following principles:
Development Patterns and Neighborhood Form
• Encourage open spaces, parks and trails in all neighborhood developments. Surveys
indicate that a high quality of life is found when residents have visual access to green
spaces.
• Create neighborhoods with a variety of housing types that are well connected
with roads, trails or sidewalks.
• Maintain the integrity of rural neighborhoods and promote development
patterns consistent with existing rural residential development.
• Recognize neighborhood characteristics and promote new development compatible
in scale, architectural quality and style with existing neighborhoods.
• Stage residential growth to minimize the amount of adjacent developments which
occur within the same time period.
• Guide density to areas with proximity to existing infrastructure and future
infrastructure availability.
• Concentrate higher density development near service oriented businesses to help
promote walkability.
• Consider planned development in surrounding communities when making land use
decisions in the City.
Road Patterns
• Recognize regional highway capacity and planned improvements, along with use
forecasts, as major factors in planning for growth and land use changes.
• Establish collector streets with good connections through the community’s growth
areas.
• Promote trails and sidewalk access near roads and thoroughfares to encourage multi-
modal transportation choices.
• Consider opportunities to improve north-south travel within the City.
Open Spaces and Natural Resources
• Preserve natural resources throughout the community and provide educational
opportunities to residents to help them understand the value of natural areas.
• Preserve open spaces and natural resources.
• Protect wooded areas and encourage improvement of existing resources and
reforestation. Evaluate existing woodland protections and supplement as necessary.
• Support the guidelines identified in the Open Space Report to preserve the City’s
natural systems.
Business Districts and Commercial Areas
• Focus service businesses and development near urban residential densities and along
primary transportation corridors.
• Provide connections between residents and commercial areas and promote businesses
within mixed-use areas.
• Work to create job opportunities in the community for Medina residents to reduce
traffic and commuting demands.
• Emphasize service and retail uses which serve the needs of the local community and
provide opportunities for the community to gather.
• Support business development with a corporate campus style which provides
open and protects natural resources.
Rural Designations
Objectives:
1. Allow low-density development in the Rural Residential Area including innovative
arrangements of homes that preserve open space and natural resources.
2. Encourage conservation of open space, farms and ecologically significant natural resources
in the rural areas.
3. Enforce stringent standards for the installation and maintenance of permanent, on-
site sewage disposal systems.
4. Allow public facilities and services, such as parks and trail systems, if compatible with
rural service area development.
5. Allow land uses, such as home-based businesses, hobby farms, horse stables, nurseries
and other smaller-scale rural activities, which will not conflict with adjoining residential
development.
6. Regulate noise, illumination, animals, and odors as needed to maintain public health and
safety.
7. Maintain a maximum density of one unit per forty acres for property in the Agricultural
land use.
8. Maintain a maximum density of one unit per ten acres for new development in the Rural
Residential and Future Development Area land use.
9. Consider exceptions to maximum density standards for open space developments that
protect natural features and put land into permanent conservation. Within the
Metropolitan Council’s long term sewer service area (reference Map 5-5), these
exceptions will be allowed to result in development with a density in excess of one unit
per ten gross acres if consistent with the Metropolitan Council’s Flexible Residential
Development Guidelines.
10. Urban services will not be provided to the Agricultural, Rural Residential, or Future
Development Area land uses during this planning cycle.
11. Require preservation of natural slopes, wetlands, woodlands and other significant
natural characteristics.
12. Require that lots contain adequate soil types and conditions as defined in the City's
on-site septic system requirements.
13. Protect property within the Future Development Area designation from subdivision and
development by requiring ghost plats for subdivisions so that future urban expansion is
not compromised.
14. Reduce impervious surfaces where possible by applying low impact design standards
and encourage innovative materials and plans that reduce runoff.
15. Encourage and incentivize landowners to participate in the protection and conservation of
significant natural resources.
Section 826.25.1. Rural Residential-Urban Reserve (RR-UR) Purpose. The purpose of this
district is to provide a zoning district which is consistent with the area guided for future
residential or mixed-use development in the city’s comprehensive plan. The district includes
areas which are not currently served by municipal urban services but are planned to be at some
time in the future. Development within the RR-UR district shall be limited as specified in this
section of the ordinance in order to accommodate efficient future development.
835.2 - ZONING – RURAL BUSINESS HOLDING DISTRICT
Section 835.2.01. Purpose. The purpose of this district is to provide a zoning district which is
consistent with the area guided for business reserve in the city’s comprehensive plan. The rural
business holding zone includes areas of the community lying outside of the area in which urban
services are currently available to business uses but which will be added to the urban service
area in the future. Development within the rural commercial holding district shall be limited in
scale until municipal utility services are available and shall be designed in a way to efficiently
accommodate additional development in the future and also designed to protect and enhance the
natural environment.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 07/12/2022 Minutes
1
Public Hearing – SH Ventures, Inc. – Planned Unit Development Revised Concept Plan
(PID 0511823220005)
Finke stated that the Commission reviewed a concept for this property in fall of 2021 and the applicant
has since reduced the proposed scale. He stated that the concept would include nine buildings on the 35-
acre property. He stated that the property is guided future development area (FDA) in the Comprehensive
Plan and is currently zoned rural residential/urban reserve. He presented the concept site plan providing
details on access and reviewing the conceptual building drawings. He suggested that the Commission
discuss the proposed use, the scale of development, and whether the PUD objectives are achieved through
this proposed development. He stated that the previous concept proposed access to Highway 55, but the
updated concept proposes access from Pioneer Trail. He noted that dedication of right-of-way was also
shown along the northern boundary of the site. He noted that if the plan does move forward there is most
likely flexibility within the layout to provide right-of-way in different locations as preferred by staff. He
noted that the rural business holding (RBH) district standards were provided in the staff report for
comparison purposes and advised that those minimum standards are not met through this proposal. He
noted that within the RBH district the allowable space is determined based off SAC units, even though
the property would not connect to municipal water and provided additional details.
Rhem asked if a rezoning and/or Comprehensive Plan amendment would be necessary to support this use.
Finke stated that a rezoning would be necessary, but there would need to be discussion on whether a
Comprehensive Plan amendment would also be necessary.
Rhem invited the applicant to address the Commission.
Bill Stodder, applicant, commented that they have reduced the scale by over 30 percent since the last
concept review which uses only 13 percent of the gross land, while donating 3.6 acres to the City for
future transportation purposes. He commented that while they reduced the density, they also increased
the overall land amount as they have an additional two plus acres under contract. He stated that they also
increased screening between the subject property and property to the east. He commented that they left
the northeast quadrant basically empty in order to maintain the rural character in that area. He noted that
they also softened the look of the buildings to better blend into the area. He felt that this would be a good
use for the corridor as the property was previously zoned commercial. He believed that this would fit
well with the future development that will most likely occur in this area and it will also increase the tax
base of the City without placing additional burden on City services. He noted that there is demand for
this use in this area, noting that the existing auto condominium complex will be sold out by the time this
project moves forward. He believed that this use would generate less noise and traffic than multiple
homes.
Piper asked Lot 1, Block 2, is currently owned by the applicant.
Stodder commented that there is a 31-acre property and six-acre property that he has under contract but
has not yet closed on.
Piper referenced the property to the south and asked if that is a residence.
Stodder confirmed that is a home. He estimated 340 between the existing home and proposed
development.
Piper referenced Parcel B and asked if that is separate and for future expansion purposes.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 07/12/2022 Minutes
2
Stodder replied that it proposed to be used for septic and would not be proposed to have future
development.
Rhem asked the applicant for input on the right-of-way recommendation of staff.
Stodder replied that he was not aware that right-of-way would be wanted on both the north and south. He
noted that they are proposing 5.0 acres of development and would be donating 3.6 acres of right-of-way
along the northern boundary. He stated that they would lose more units if they provided that on the south
as well, essentially donating more land to the City than they would be developing.
Rhem stated that a second phase was mentioned and asked for details.
Stodder stated that MnDOT mentions addressing the intersection at some time and therefore has shown
that the six-acre parcel could have a building of up to 20,000 square feet in the future for planning
purposes.
Rhem opened the public hearing at 7:30 p.m.
Brian Stewart, 4565 Pioneer Trail, stated that his family moved into the home two years ago and chose
the location in order to find a more rural area. He stated that he was surprised to find this proposal for
this property. He commented that he has a long driveway that touches the covenant area. He was
concerned with the additional traffic this could bring to the quiet residential area. He noted that there is a
large horse ranch on one side with a community of residential homes on the other side. He did not
believe this motorplex use would fit in that area. He expressed concerns with noise from events as well as
drinking and driving. He stated that the land is currently priced very low because it is dirt, noting that he
actually checked into purchasing the property just to keep it vacant. He noted that Medina is not lacking
in tax base and could easily replace the tax base that would be generated from this property with a few
multi-million-dollar homes. He commented that Highway 55 is very busy and believed that the additional
vehicles from this site onto Pioneer Trail would not be helpful and would turn that into a racetrack. He
stated that if this is approved, he would come back for a carwash that he would place at the end of his
driveway.
Piper asked if the resident has a lot line shared with this proposed development.
Stewart commented that his driveway has a 23-foot easement at the end, which is one of the seven
involved in the covenant, therefore this request would impact the access to their driveway.
Paul Humiston, 3955 Chippewa Circle, appreciated the comments from staff relating to access. He stated
that the first development that comes into that corridor along Highway 55 should include long-term plans
for access that does not impact the residents to the east or the horse farm. He stated that his property is
south of this proposed development, and they treasure the views from their property. He realized that
there will eventually be development but would like to see a better plan for it. He commented that this
proposed development would change what they can see and how their neighborhood is perceived. He
stated that they appreciate the community goals of Medina and noted that there is nothing remotely rural
in this proposal and did not believe it fit in this area of Medina.
Neil Campion, 4585 Pioneer Trail, commented that this concept came as somewhat of a surprise. He
stated that he met with the developer about one month ago to review the new concept and commented that
even though the development proposal has been scaled back, that does not alleviate his concerns. He
commented that his property is directly to the east of this proposed development and to the south of the
additional property under contract, therefore he would be impacted on two sides. He stated that if this is
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 07/12/2022 Minutes
3
approved, it should be assumed that everything to the west and south should be an industrial park, and no
one would want to build a residential property adjacent to this development. He noted that unfortunately
the homes to the east are already built. He commented that Pioneer Trail is a nice road where people can
walk and kids can ride bikes, but that will be impacted by the additional traffic this use would bring. He
noted that this use would have monthly open houses and asked where parking would occur for those
events. He stated that he is not concerned with the view from Highway 55 and is more concerned with
the view that the existing residents would have. He commented that he is against this proposal and the
impact to privacy it would have on the existing residents.
Leonard Leuer, 3625 Chippewa Road, commented that the motorplex would be the home of several high-
performance vehicles and was aware of no Medina maintained roads that has a speed limit of over 40
mph. He commented that there has been more youthful exuberance on the tar roads. He asked how these
drivers would be dealt with and believed that it should be the job of the applicant. He suggested that
membership be tied to driver/vehicle infractions, meaning that membership can be revoked for
infractions. He commented that there is a billboard on the property to the east and asked if that would be
removed with this proposal.
Lisa Hanson, 4555 Pioneer Trail, appreciated the comments thus far as she also lives in the area. She
expressed concern for Pioneer Trail turning into a drag racing strip. She stated that she walks her dog on
that road and people ride horses on that road. She did not believe this was a good fit for the property at
this time. She stated that perhaps the access could be provided from CR 19.
Brian Hauge, 3505 Pioneer Trail, stated that they built their home on 13 acres seven years ago. He
appreciated the concept of increasing tax base for the community but believed there was a balance. He
stated that he has three small children that ride their bikes with him on Pioneer Trail to Hamel
Road/Hamel Park. He stated that this past weekend they biked past the motorplex on Arrowhead and
there were vehicles racing by on Hamel Road. He recognized that the vehicles were not doing anything
illegal but acknowledged that there is an impact. He stated that moving the access from Highway 55 to
Pioneer just moves that problem. He stated that there will be events at the facility and did not believe
Pioneer Trail was the logical access point.
Todd Albers, 4800 Covey Trail, stated that his road is about one mile east of the project. He stated that he
was a member of the Planning Commission and Steering Committee when the Comprehensive Plan was
developed. He noted that this property was purposely designated as FDA in order to purposefully
postpone development. He stated that the committee spent a lot of time listening to residents, addressing
those concerns, and protecting the rural vistas and viewsheds. He stated that the Metropolitan Council is
looking to place additional infrastructure in this general area, although it may be located in another
community, and if that is done, this area would be needed for residential development in order to support
the infrastructure. He stated that he is also very opposed to the access on Pioneer Trail as that road is not
currently designed to handle additional traffic. He commented that there is a lot of pedestrian traffic
without shoulders. He stated that additional traffic would create hazards for residents in this area.
Rhem closed the public hearing at 8:02 p.m.
Popp stated that many of the comments from the public align with what he has been thinking. He stated
that he was opposed to this when the Commission reviewed it in the fall and did not see anything that
changes that. He did not see synergy with the existing infrastructure and would like to honor and
preserve the rural heritage of Medina. He stated that this strongly contradicts rural residential and
specifically the existing residents to the east. He stated that it is not assumed that there will be
commercial development in this area, and it could become residential. He stated that the use of FDA is
smart planning, and the City should not take that for granted. He did not see a benefit in changing the
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 07/12/2022 Minutes
4
use. He stated that while there would be economic benefit for the City through this development, it would
impact the reasons why residents move to Medina. He stated that he still opposes this development
concept.
Piper echoed the comments of Popp. She stated that she did not like the concept in the fall and still does
not like it.
Jacob asked the typical setback from Highway 55. He noted that most businesses are not visible from
Highway 55.
Finke replied that the minimum setback in the planned development area is 50 feet but acknowledged that
many facilities are setback further.
Jacob agreed that Pioneer Trail would not be a good fit for access to the site and believed that should
come from CR 19. He asked if there have been any traffic studies that would provide data on the traffic
patterns of an motorplex use.
Finke stated that traffic counts have not been done specific to that use.
Jacob stated that it would be interesting to know that for comparison purposes to different uses. He noted
that a set of buildings would be relatively calm with the exception of their events but agreed that he would
not want to live next to that use either.
Grajczyk stated that it is good to have FDA areas in Medina as a placeholder for future development and
allow the community to react to future needs. He stated that Highway 55 is a major thoroughfare and will
be extremely busy in the future. He stated that he likes the FDA guiding and believes it should remain.
He stated that currently there are five homes to the east and reviewed other adjacent uses, noting that this
is a mixed-use area that will pose challenges in the future. He stated that even the existing motorplex
should work with the City Police to ensure safety is provided for events. He stated that he does like the
idea of creating some type of frontage roads heading to the west towards CR 19, which would provide an
opportunity to open that area and reduce traffic. He stated that the goal is to have a well-rounded
community and would like to see the FDA remain on the parcel to allow the City to react to future needs.
Rhem echoed the comments of the Commission. He stated that he is opposed to the concept and has
concerns with access on Pioneer Trail.
Finke noted that this concept will be presented to the City Council at its August 3rd meeting.
Medina Park Commission Excerpt from 10/20/2021 Minutes
1
SH Ventures, Inc. – PID 05-118-23-22-0005 – Lifestyle Auto Condos – PUD Concept Plan –
Park Dedication Review
Planning Director Dusty Finke provided an overview of the PUD Concept Plan application
for private auto condos on a site south of Highway 55 and west of Pioneer Trail. The concept
plan proposes 12 buildings with a 258,000 square foot footprint on 30 acres. The land is
currently zoned as rural residential-urban reserve and is guided in the 2020-2040
Comprehensive Plan as future development area.
Finke reviewed the Park Dedication ordinance noting the Park Commission could require
10% of the land, which would total three acres, 8% of the market value of the pre-developed
land, which would be approximately $50,000 to $75,000 or a combination. He noted the cash
value for this project is much less than a dense residential development, which has a
minimum park dedication fee of $3,500 per unit.
Finke explained that the City’s park and trail plans do not currently identify improvements in
the area of the subject site because the Comprehensive Plan does not anticipate intensive
development in the area within the currently planning horizon. He stated that staff believes it
is important that the City not miss opportunities or paint itself into a corner by allowing a
development which does not provide provisions for future park and trail improvements.
Finke noted if the development were to proceed, staff would recommend trail easements
effectively around the perimeter of the site to provide for future potential connections to
adjoining properties. The trail easements would be secured with the development but may not
be built out for decades when the surrounding areas develop.
Finke explained the City’s general goal to have parks no more than half a mile from planned
residential developments. He noted the Future Development Areas (FDA) in the vicinity
would likely require a minimum of two parks in the future when development occurs. He
noted the subject site is in the northeast area of the FDA and its proposed use of auto condos
would not have a high demand for park needs. Therefore, it may make sense to plan for a
future park further west of the subject site.
Bill Stoddard, applicant, introduced himself and highlighted some of the projects that he has
completed in the metro area. He stated that they are hopeful that this meeting will provide
input prior to them moving onto a more formal design stage. He noted he felt his project was
a good use in this FDA since residential may not make sense right off Highway 55.
Jacob polled each Park Commissioner on the project and there was a consensus to support
staff’s recommendations to require trail easements around the perimeter of the property and
look for future park opportunities further west of this site as future development occur.
Medina City Council Excerpt from 11/16/2021 Minutes
1
SH Ventures, Inc. – PID 05-118-23-22-0005 – Lifestyle Auto Condos – PUD Concept Plan
(7:23 p.m.)
Finke presented a concept plan review for an auto condo project on the subject site
approximately 258,000 square feet in size. He reviewed the zoning and guiding of the parcel
and adjacent properties. He displayed the concept plan noting the primary access proposed
from Highway 55. He displayed an updated rendering for the site. He provided details on the
future development area, noting that it is generally not intended for development within the
current timeframe of the Comprehensive Plan. He also provided details on the rural residential
urban reserve zoning. He stated that technical review items were included in the staff report.
He asked if the Council would support non-residential uses within the future development area.
Martin stated that perhaps the Council should be polled at this time as that question would
determine whether additional review would be necessary. She noted that if the rezoning and
use were not supported, the other questions would then perhaps become moot.
DesLauriers commented that he likes what he is seeing in terms of the autoplex but is unsure if
he would support the rezoning. He noted that he would be willing to listen to more details.
Albers stated that this area was purposely set aside for future development for residential when
the current Comprehensive Plan was developed. He stated that if there are changes to
Corcoran, Medina may need to allocate additional housing units and therefore this area was
reserved for residential development. He stated that another question would be what may
happen with Highway 55 and its expansion and therefore he is hesitant to change the
designation of the property from FDA to PUD. He stated that he would also be willing to
continue to listen.
Reid stated that FDA is for properties designated for urban services in 20 years or more and in
the time being the property is not to be used for large businesses. She did not believe the FDA
guiding should be changed.
Cavanaugh commented that the property is currently raw land. He noted that if large homes are
developed on the property that would also lock the City into a use which he is not sure was the
best use of property along Highway 55. He stated that he does like the increase in tax base that
the project would provide and the low amount of traffic that would be generated. He stated that
he would be open to listening.
Martin concurred with the comments made thus far.
Finke stated that the applicant proposes a direct access to Highway 55. He noted that
preliminary discussions were had with MnDOT indicating that right and left turn lanes would be
required. He noted that generally staff recommends against new access onto Highway 55. He
stated that the property is afforded access to adjacent roadways. He stated that if the City is
going to allow non-residential use within FDA perhaps it would make sense to have that
adjacent to a different roadway, such as CR 19. He provided details on the right-of-way that
would be requested if this were allowed to move forward. He stated that the City has a rural
business holding district, reviewing those regulations, and asking if that would be a good guide
to use. He stated that if this moves forward staff would recommend larger setbacks and more
buffering to limit the impact on existing residential properties. He stated that a review was
completed by the Park Commission which recommended that the City be aggressive with the
Medina City Council Excerpt from 11/16/2021 Minutes
2
requirement for trail easements. The Park Commission did not recommend a significant amount
of park land. He stated that the Planning Commission held a public hearing and two adjacent
neighbors raised concern with the intensity adjacent to residential property and originally
proposed second access which has since been removed. He noted that the majority of the
Commission did not find the use compatible with FDA, although two Commissioners believed it
may be consistent with certain adjustments.
Cavanaugh stated that he would want to ensure that any potential changes for Highway 55 have
been accounted for. He stated that in terms of the concept, an auto condo would be a low user
of City services in return for the increase in tax base. He stated that this is an intense use and
would perhaps need to come down in scope.
Martin asked if the City could say interim access would be provided at one location now and
then if Highway 55 is expanded, the access would need to change.
Batty commented that would be a challenge to draft and he could not recall doing something
specific like that but did not see a reason that could not be done if there were alternate access
available.
Reid stated that this does not seem to qualify for a PUD. She stated that there has been no
explanation on how this would qualify for a PUD. She did not believe this would be an
appropriate use within FDA. She commented that the architect appears to be unaware of the
desire for Medina to maintain a rural atmosphere.
Albers commented that his property abuts Highway 55 and he is aware of how busy that
roadway is. He stated that his concern would be related to access to Highway 55 and believed
that should be done from CR 19. He stated that he would not want to see access using Pioneer
Trail. He stated that he also has a concern with events that could be hosted at the site in terms
of frequency and the traffic that would be anticipated. He stated that he was concerned with a
lack of modulation in the design. He agreed with Reid that this does not seem to meet the
requirements of Medina in terms of design.
DesLauriers commented that it is a great opportunity as the tax base generated is a benefit for a
use that generally does not have much intensity. He stated that he is concerned with this use
having access onto Highway 55. He suggested that the property access from Chippewa Trail.
Martin appreciated the input and agreed with the comments made. She stated that she also
has trouble seeing that this development would justify the use of a PUD. She noted that she is
also concerned with access from Highway 55. She noted that this was zoned FDA being they
are uncertain how Highway 55 improvements will play out. She also expressed concern with
noise that would be generated from events and the impact that would have on the existing
residential development.
Neil Campion, resident, stated that he voiced his objection to the concept at the public hearing
held by the Planning Commission. He noted that he voiced objection to the secondary access,
which has since been removed. He was also concerned with events, noting that some people
could choose to park on Pioneer Trail and walk up his driveway to access the site. He stated
that gaining access to Highway 55 from Pioneer is already a challenge and was unsure how
another access would not generate additional backups. He stated that the building height
seems tall and had concern with light spill onto his property.
Medina City Council Excerpt from 11/16/2021 Minutes
3
Bill Stoddard, applicant, stated that he has developed a number of projects throughout the
metro mainly apartments, residential, and senior living. He appreciated the input and feedback
of the Council. He stated that this is a large 31-acre site, and they are willing to address the
recommendations of staff related to landscaping, buffering, setbacks, right-of-way, stormwater
treatment, and fire suppression service. He stated that initially they did propose a secondary
access but removed that and would dedicate the road to the neighboring properties. He stated
that they have met with MnDOT, and they would allow an access to this location, noting that the
road would be widened to add a left and right turn lane, which would make that section safer.
He noted that this is a property that would not use many City services but would provide a good
tax base. He stated that they can have lighting restrictions and limit the number of events on
the site. He stated that the property was previously zoned commercial before the change to
FDA. He believed that the timing is now or soon for this property and did not believe residential
would be the best use of the property along Highway 55 with commercial use across the street.
He stated that senior living was previously not believed to fit within residential but has turned out
to be a good combination.
Albers asked if there would be a limit on the size of berming that could be done along the
southeastern edge to provide additional screening for the residential area.
Finke believed there is a limitation on the height of the berm and other specifications. He noted
that significant berming can be done.
Reid asked if the applicant would be willing to redesign to better fit within the rural design of
Medina.
Stoddard confirmed that they could work on the design to make it fit in better.
Martin commented that she is having difficulty understanding how a piece of property
designated FDA and RRUR would be allowed for a condo complex of this nature and whether
that would make sense. She also struggled to see how this plan would achieve the objectives
of the PUD ordinance. She stated that should this move forward she would like a narrative on
how this would achieve the PUD objectives. She stated that she would also want input from
legal on how the change from FDA to this use is allowed.
Reid stated that she objects to this use on this property and does not see how it qualifies for a
PUD.
Albers stated that he always thinks about what may be developed on this property if this is not
allowed. He stated that he would want to think through what is best for the City and what the
future could bring.
DesLauriers commented that he is looking forward to the additional feedback from the applicant.
Revised Concept Stage PUD Application for a 37 Acre
Parcel Located on State Hwy. 55 in Medina for a Reduced Scale
Upscale Life-Style Auto Condo Development
Proposed Concept PUD Application Summary:
Our proposed revised development by SH Ventures, Inc. for a very upscale Life-
Style Auto Condo development has been not only reduced in size by over 30% to
165 units but we have also gained an additional 5.7 acres which now offers more
open space to the surrounding neighborhood. Our development is now proposed to
be on 37 acres and will include a new site access off of Pioneer Trail and includes
us donating 3.55 acres to the City for ROW use for a future frontage road to help
solve the area’s future transportation navigation.
New Proposed Project Highlights:
- Reduced scale of development by over 30%. Previously proposed 12 building
with 240 Units, now proposing 9 buildings with 165 Units;
- Reduced auto condo area to about 13.5% of gross land area;
- Added additional property of approximately 5.7 acres;
- Added additional buffering, screening & berming to existing tree cover;
- Enhanced rural feel along Hwy 55 by providing for about 850 feet to over
1,350 feet of open space along our northern site;
- Omitted site access from Hwy 55 with proposed Pioneer Trail access and
offering to donate 3.55 acres to City for ROW for future frontage road
transportation needs;
- New Landscape plan exceeding Staff’s recommended amounts with large
amounts of landscape screening in southeast corner of site;
- Concept Civil Engineering Plan Package including Utility & Implementation
Plans provided;
- Medina Parks & Trails Commission recommendations incorporated; and
- Medina Planning Commission & City Council recommendations incorporated
in attached Concept Plans;
City Council Member & Staff Directives from Previous Meetings Summary:
We have re-designed our proposed development by listening to the planning
commissioners, city councilmembers, staff and engineering team and incorporated
the below remarks from those public and private meeting in our updated plans
including the following:
- Use of enhanced landscaping, buffering, screening and berming;
- Softened the “feel” and enhanced “rural” nature of area by obtaining more
property, lowering density and proposing 850-1,350 feet of open space along
the northern Hwy 55 border;
- Removing site access from Hwy 55;
- Future transportation planning issue now solved with our proposed 3.55 acre
ROW dedication to City;
- Softening the color scheme of buildings and adding some articulation to
design;
- Enhancing City tax base with proposed over $50,000,000 project projecting
to generate about $25,000,000 after build-out in taxes over 20 years (that’s
the length of time before likely public services come to this area)!
- Noise and maintenance items to be governed and addressed in homeowners
association documents; and
- Proposed lighting to be minimal amount of site lighting for life safety &
security. Down facing lighting at garage and access doors to be further
designed and detailed in next Application stage.
Response to Review Criteria/Staff Comments from City Staff Report of
11/16/202 Numbers 1 Thru 11:
1. Refer to Anderson Engineering Page C5-Implementation Plan for future
infrastructure connections.
2. Refer to Exhibit 4-Water Well Memorandum by Anderson Engineering.
3. Revised proposed site access eliminating Hwy 55 construction.
4. Refer to #3 response above.
5. Refer to Anderson Engineering Page C5-Implementation Plan for future
infrastructure connections. Developer will obtain cost estimates and incorporate into
its HOA fees to owners for estimated future implementation work.
6. Setbacks enlarged with berming and buffering added along with leaving existing
foliage in southeast corner of property incorporated into project re-design.
7. Proposed events to be held about 6-8 times/year to be competitive in marketplace.
Normally held on Saturday afternoons with on-site parking provided and on-site
security at any events. Additional detailed information to be forwarded at next
Application Stage.
8. Wetland Delineation by Anderson Engineering & City approved NOD included
in Exhibit 7. For total lengthy report review please contact City Planning Director
who has full electronic version.
9. Landscape quantities exceeding City code proposed refer to Exhibit 2 Pages L1
& L2 for Landscaping Plan.
10. ROW land to be given to City consisting of 3.55 acres for future transportation-
frontage road needs. Refer to Exhibit 2 Page C3 for Right-Of-Way Dedication Plan.
11. Applicant striving to exceed relevant City requirements with proposed PUD and
dedicate 3.55 acres to city for ROW transportation needs to qualify for PUD Zoning.
Project Background:
There has been a strong demand for similar projects and our proposed development
aims to raise the bar and deliver a beautiful auto condo designed by award winning
ESG Architecture & Design. Our project as designed can be an option to the “up
north cabin” and a quick get-away as a “he-shed/she-shed” or perhaps to look at your
favorite automobile and send a couple emails from a superior setting than the kitchen
table that gets used so frequently as Covid and market desires has changed how we
spend our time and where. The market is burgeoning for this product and our
proposed development may add north of $50,000,000.00 to the local tax base, (that’s
over $1,000,000/year in taxes ($25,000,000 in 20 years)! This project will not
require municipal services of water & sewer.
We have designed open space and re-designed setbacks of over 100 to 200 feet to
the east and south neighboring properties. We have eliminated our early Hwy 55
proposed access and replaced it with a new Pioneer Trail access while dedicating
3.55 acres to the City for future transportation needs for a frontage road. Projected
Trip generations are very low during the weekdays with trips generally happening
on Saturdays at other developments that we desire to compliment. Trip generations
are much lower with our proposed development than residential uses or commercial
uses the city previously had zoned the subject property. We propose to cluster the
units in the northern and western portions of the site.
This Narrative and accompanying Plans & Exhibits will further detail items as
requested by the City Planning Director and City Ordinances.
Updated Concept PUD Information per City Code Section 827.33 Subd. 2:
(a) General Information: Names and addresses of existing landowner and
applicant found on City Application Form. Professional Consultants for our
proposed development include:
Architect: ESG Architecture & Design
500 S. Washington Ave. #1080
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Civil Engineer: Anderson Engineering of MN, LLC
13605 1st Ave. N #100
Plymouth, MN 55441
Traffic Engineer: Swing Traffic Solutions
4290 Norwood Land North
Plymouth, MN 55442
Attorney/Legal: Messerli & Kramer
1400 Fifth Street Towers
100 South Fifth St.
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Title Company: Custom Homes Builders Title LLC
10850Old County Rd 15 #100
Plymouth, MN 55441
Applicant and landowners confirm that valid purchase agreements and title
commitments by Custom Homes Builders Title LLC of Plymouth, MN exist.
(b) Present Status: The PIDs, unassigned addresses and limited legal addresses
of the vacant land are attached Exhibit 1-PID & Limited Legal Description of
Property.
(c) Written Statement: Refer to above Proposed Concept Stage PUD
Application Summary and attached Exhibits.
(d) Site Conditions: Site conditions detailed in attached Exhibit 2-Civil
Engineering Plan Package by Anderson Engineering. Existing Survey by
Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. depicts a relatively flat site currently being farmed as a
corn field, with a small amount of wooded area on the far eastern border.
Proposed drainage and stormwater control depicted on Utility plan attached.
(e) Schematic Drawings of Proposed Development: Refer to attached Exhibit
3-Schematic Concept Plans by ESG Architects depicting Upscale Life-Style
Auto Condo Plans & Renderings and Draft Site Plan.
(f) Statement of Number of Units & SF of Developed Land: We have lowered
our proposed development to 165 units in 9 buildings from our initial
proposed 240 units over 12 buildings. This reduction comes on top of our
overall gross site area increasing from 31.5 to 37.09 acres.
No area will be devoted to residential use however unit owners will be able to
customize their interiors which may include bathrooms and kitchenettes.
Mezzanines of up to 50% of floor space will be options to owners, however
does not expect to add to much additional traffic or heavier use, as owners and
guests will either be on floor level OR mezz level, not cramming in workers
like the commercial codes ruling mezzanines are written for. All of the single-
use space will be devoted to upscale auto condos. 933,302 sf. (63.9%) of Net
open space proposed to be preserved with an outdoor pavilion with picnic
tables and play area for youngsters being planned.
Proposed Development Area: Gross Area (1): Net Area (2):
Developable Area: 37.09 acres 33.54 acres
(1,615,640.4 sf) (1,461,002.4 sf)
Life-Style Auto Condo Area: 218,800 sf (13.5%) 218,800 sf (15.0%)
Pavement Area (3): 308,900 sf (19.1% 308,900 sf (21.1%)
Open Space Area: N/A Refer to Net 21.43 acres
(933,302 sf) (63.9%)
Notes: (1) 37.09 Gross acres includes 3.55 acre ROW area.
(2) 33.54 Net acres includes 1.37 acre access easement area.
(3) Pavement Area to include paved roads & parking.
(g) PUD Staging: PUD will be in two stages with the auto condos in stage one.
Site work will be done first for most of the 9 buildings and then 1-2 buildings
will be done at the same time until all 9 buildings are completed. This may
take approximately three construction seasons. The second stage (maximum
of 20,000 sf commercial/industrial) building may overlap with stage 1
construction however will be a separate stand-alone phase.
(h) Open Space Provisions: All individual owners in this development will be
required to be a member of an Auto condo owners association-similar to a
homeowners association governed by rules, regulations and regular
maintenance fees to ensure all open spaces and roads are maintained on a
regular basis.
(i) Restrictive Covenants: Restrictive covenants will be filed with title limiting
and regulating ownership regarding site use and maintenance, etc. as the City
desires and applicant believes an upscale development like this warrants.
Overnight living will be specifically prohibited in the forthcoming unit
owners association documents, similar to a homeowners association which
have rules and regulations specifying acceptable and non-acceptable uses.
(j) Schematic Utilities Plan: Schematic Utility Plans are attached in Exhibit 2-
Civil Engineering Plan Package indicating placement of water wells, septic
and stormwater control. Our projects use will require very low water usage
with some unit owners opting to customize their units with bathrooms and/or
mini-kitchenettes requiring water and sanitary sewage needs. Life Safety Fire
Suppression System details from Summit Fire Consulting options to be
forwarded at next Application stage.
(k) Mailing Labels: Mailing Labels previously submitted to Staff.
(l) & (m) Additional Information: Applicant will forward any additional
information as requested by Zoning Administrator, Planning Commission
and/or City Council as requested.
ATTACHED EXHIBITS:
1. PID’s & Limited Legal Description of Properties;
2. Civil Engineering Plan Package by Anderson Engineering;
3. Architectural Concept Plans by ESG Architects;
4. Water Well Capacity Memorandum by Anderson Engineering;
5. Septic System Primary & Alternate Site Design by HomeStead Septic
6. Concept Life Safety Fire Suppression System Options from Summit Fire
Consulting;
7. Wetland Delineation by Anderson Engineering;
File: Medina PUD Concept II Application
OUTLOT A
PI
O
N
E
E
R
T
R
A
I
L
MN STATE HWY 55
OUTLOT
B
OUTLOT C
PROPOSED STORMWATER POND
PROPOSED
STORMWATER
POND
LOT 1
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 1
BLDG 9
LOTS 146-165BLDG 8
LOTS 126-145
BLDG 1
LOTS 1-15
BLDG
2
LOTS
16-25
BLDG
3
LOTS
26-45
BLDG
5
LOTS
66-85
BLDG
4
LOTS
46-65
BLDG 6
LOTS 86-105
GATE
PICNIC
AREA
20,000 SF
FUTURE
COMMERCIAL
32
19
3321
29
29
2929
EXISTING TREE
CANOPY TO REMAIN
SEE L1
PLANTING
PLAN FOR
ADDITIONAL
SCREENING
IN THIS
AREA
EXISTING TREE
CANOPY TO REMAIN
BLDG 7
LOTS 106-125
PAR
C
E
L
B
PAR
C
E
L
C
LOT
1
BLO
C
K
1
MAP
L
E
TRA
I
L
A
D
D
'
N
0 80'160'
N
SITE DATA
PARKING SUMMARY
TOTAL STALLS
TOTAL UNITS
STALLS PER UNIT
=221
=165
=1.34
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
BUILDING:BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2
FRONT YARD: 35 FT 50 FT
SIDE YARD:50 FT 50 FT
REAR YARD: 100FT 50 FT
PARKING:BLOCK 2 BLOCK 2
FRONT YARD:100 FT 20 FT
SIDE YARD: 50 FT 10 FT
REAR YARD:100 FT 10 FT
WETLAND:
TOTAL AREA: 1.25 AC (54,311 SQ. FT.)
TYPE: MANAGE II
PERIMETER: 2,243 LN. FT
IMPACT AREA: 62 SQ. FT.
WETLAND SETBACK:
AREA: 1.18 AC (51,393 SQ. FT.)
PERIMETER: 2,980 LN. FT
IMPACT AREA: 1,808 SQ. FT.
WETLAND INFORMATION
ROAD SUMMARY
BITUMINOUS AREA =308,900 SQ.FT.
DRIVE AISLES (TWO-WAY) =24 FT
PARKING STALLS
WIDTH: 9'-0"
LENGTH: 20'-0"
BUFFER REQUIREMENTS
UPLAND BUFFER ZONE AVERAGE WIDTH: 25 FEET
MINIMUM UPLAND BUFFER ZONE WIDTH: 20 FEET
BUFFER SETBACK (PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE): 15 FEET
BUFFER SETBACK (ACCESSORY STRUCTURE): 5 FEET
SITE PLAN
C1
LEGEND
PROPERTY LIMITS
BUILDING SETBACKS
PARKING SETBACK
PROPOSED CONCRETE C&G
EXISTING WETLAND
NUMBER OF PARKING STALL IN
SECTION
EDGE OF EXISTING TREE CANOPY
16
LAND AREA
DEVELOPABLE DEDICATED ACCESS TOTAL
ROW EASEMENT
PARCEL B 28.4 AC 1.7 AC 0.00 AC 30.1 AC
(WEST 1
4 SECTION)
PARCEL C 0.00 AC 0.00 AC 1.4 AC 1.4 AC
(EAST PARCEL)
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 3.8 AC 1.9 AC 0.00 AC 5.7 AC
(MAPLE TRAIL
ADDITION)
TOTAL: 32.2 AC 3.6 AC 1.4 AC 37.2 AC
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
EXISTING PROPOSED
ZONING:
PARCEL B RURAL BUSINESS PLANNED UNIT
(WEST 1
4 SECTION)HOLDING (RBH)DEVELOPMENT(PUD)
PARCEL C RURAL BUSINESS PLANNED UNIT
(EAST PARCEL)HOLDING (RBH)DEVELOPMENT(PUD)
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 RURAL BUSINESS PLANNED UNIT
(MAPLE TRAIL ADDITION)HOLDING (RBH)DEVELOPMENT(PUD)
BLDG AREA: 218,740 SQ. FT
UNITS: 165
PLOTTED:COMM. NO.
DRAWING NO.
----16679
1 3 6 0 5 1 s t A v e n u e N . #1 0 0
P l y m o u t h , M N 5 5 4 4 1 | a e -m n .c o m
P 7 6 3 .4 1 2 .4 0 0 0 | F 7 6 3 .4 1 2 .4 0 9 0
A n d e r s o n E n g i n e e r i n g o f M i n n e s o t a , L L C
DRAWING TITLE
CHECKED BY:DRAWN:DESIGNED:
REVISION LOG
DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONSNO.DATE
JUNE 10, 2022
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
PRINT NAME:
SIGNATURE:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE
OF MINNESOTA.
DATE:LICENSE NO.06/10/2022
PRINT NAME:
SIGNATURE:
DATE:LICENSE NO.
MEDINA AUTO
CONDOS
MEDINA
MINNESOTA
SH VENTURES INC
925 EXCELSIOR BLVD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
LEE R. KOPPY, PE
41267
66' PROPOSED
RIGHT OF WAY
66' PROPOSED
RIGHT OF WAY
PRIVATE DRIVE
100' REAR
BUILDING/PARKING
SETBACK
50
'
S
I
D
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
35' FRONT BUILDING SETBACK
100' REAR
BUILDING/
PARKING
SETBACK
50' SIDE
PARKING
SETBACK
50' FRONT
PARKING SETBACK
50' SIDE
PARKING
SETBACK
50' SIDE
BUILDING
SETBACK
50' BUILDING
SETBACK
20' PARKING
SETBACK
OUTLOT A
PI
O
N
E
E
R
T
R
A
I
L
MN STATE HWY 55
OUTLOT
B
OUTLOT C
PROPOSED STORMWATER POND
PROPOSED
STORMWATER
POND
LOT 1
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 1
BLDG 9
LOTS 146-165BLDG 8
LOTS 126-145
BLDG 1
LOTS 1-15
BLDG
2
LOTS
16-25
BLDG
3
LOTS
26-45
BLDG
5
LOTS
66-85
BLDG
4
LOTS
46-65
BLDG 6
LOTS 86-105
GATE
PICNIC
AREA
20,000 SF
FUTURE
COMMERCIAL
32
19
3321
29
29
2929
EXISTING TREE
CANOPY TO REMAIN
SEE L1
PLANTING
PLAN FOR
ADDITIONAL
SCREENING
IN THIS
AREA
EXISTING TREE
CANOPY TO REMAIN
BLDG 7
LOTS 106-125
PAR
C
E
L
B
PAR
C
E
L
C
LOT
1
BLO
C
K
1
MAP
L
E
TRA
I
L
A
D
D
'
N
0 80'160'
N
SITE PLAN - AERIAL
VIEW
C2
SITE DATA
PARKING SUMMARY
TOTAL STALLS
TOTAL UNITS
STALLS PER UNIT
=221
=165
=1.34
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
WETLAND INFORMATION
ROAD SUMMARY
BITUMINOUS AREA =308,900 SQ.FT.
DRIVE AISLES (TWO-WAY) =24 FT
PARKING STALLS
WIDTH: 9'-0"
LENGTH: 20'-0"
BUFFER REQUIREMENTS
UPLAND BUFFER ZONE AVERAGE WIDTH: 25 FEET
MINIMUM UPLAND BUFFER ZONE WIDTH: 20 FEET
BUFFER SETBACK (PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE): 15 FEET
BUFFER SETBACK (ACCESSORY STRUCTURE): 5 FEET
LAND AREA
DEVELOPABLE DEDICATED ACCESS TOTAL
ROW EASEMENT
PARCEL B 28.4 AC 1.7 AC 0.00 AC 30.1 AC
(WEST 1
4 SECTION)
PARCEL C 0.00 AC 0.00 AC 1.4 AC 1.4 AC
(EAST PARCEL)
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 3.8 AC 1.9 AC 0.00 AC 5.7 AC
(MAPLE TRAIL
ADDITION)
TOTAL: 32.2 AC 3.6 AC 1.4 AC 37.2 AC
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
EXISTING PROPOSED
ZONING:
PARCEL B RURAL BUSINESS PLANNED UNIT
(WEST 1
4 SECTION)HOLDING (RBH)DEVELOPMENT(PUD)
PARCEL C RURAL BUSINESS PLANNED UNIT
(EAST PARCEL)HOLDING (RBH)DEVELOPMENT(PUD)
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 RURAL BUSINESS PLANNED UNIT
(MAPLE TRAIL ADDITION)HOLDING (RBH)DEVELOPMENT(PUD)
BLDG AREA: 218,740 SQ. FT
UNITS: 165
PLOTTED:COMM. NO.
DRAWING NO.
----16679
1 3 6 0 5 1 s t A v e n u e N . #1 0 0
P l y m o u t h , M N 5 5 4 4 1 | a e -m n .c o m
P 7 6 3 .4 1 2 .4 0 0 0 | F 7 6 3 .4 1 2 .4 0 9 0
A n d e r s o n E n g i n e e r i n g o f M i n n e s o t a , L L C
DRAWING TITLE
CHECKED BY:DRAWN:DESIGNED:
REVISION LOG
DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONSNO.DATE
JUNE 10, 2022
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
PRINT NAME:
SIGNATURE:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE
OF MINNESOTA.
DATE:LICENSE NO.06/10/2022
PRINT NAME:
SIGNATURE:
DATE:LICENSE NO.
MEDINA AUTO
CONDOS
MEDINA
MINNESOTA
SH VENTURES INC
925 EXCELSIOR BLVD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
LEE R. KOPPY, PE
41267
66' RIGHT OF WAY
66' RIGHT OF WAY
LEGEND
PROPERTY LIMITS
BUILDING SETBACKS
PARKING SETBACK
PROPOSED CONCRETE C&G
EXISTING WETLAND
NUMBER OF PARKING STALL IN
SECTION
EDGE OF EXISTING TREE CANOPY
16
BUILDING:BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2
FRONT YARD: 35 FT 50 FT
SIDE YARD:50 FT 50 FT
REAR YARD: 100FT 50 FT
PARKING:BLOCK 2 BLOCK 2
FRONT YARD:100 FT 20 FT
SIDE YARD: 50 FT 10 FT
REAR YARD:100 FT 10 FT
WETLAND:
TOTAL AREA: 1.25 AC (54,311 SQ. FT.)
TYPE: MANAGE II
PERIMETER: 2,243 LN. FT
IMPACT AREA: 62 SQ. FT.
WETLAND SETBACK:
AREA: 1.18 AC (51,393 SQ. FT.)
PERIMETER: 2,980 LN. FT
IMPACT AREA: 1,808 SQ. FT.
OUTLOT A
PI
O
N
E
E
R
T
R
A
I
L
MN STATE HWY 55
OUTLOT
B
OUTLOT C
PROPOSED STORMWATER POND
PROPOSED
STORMWATER
POND
LOT 1
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 1
BLDG 9
LOTS 146-165BLDG 8
LOTS 126-145
BLDG 1
LOTS 1-15
BLDG
2
LOTS
16-25
BLDG
3
LOTS
26-45
BLDG
5
LOTS
66-85
BLDG
4
LOTS
46-65
BLDG 6
LOTS 86-105
GATE
PICNIC
AREA
20,000 SF
FUTURE
COMMERCIAL
32
19
3321
29
29
2929
BLDG 7
LOTS 106-125
PAR
C
E
L
B
PAR
C
E
L
C
LOT
1
BLO
C
K
1
MAP
L
E
TRA
I
L
A
D
D
'
N
0 80'160'
N
RIGHT-OF-WAY
DEDICATION PLAN
C3
LEGEND
PROPERTY LIMITS
PROPOSED CONCRETE C&G
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
DEDICATION
PLOTTED:COMM. NO.
DRAWING NO.
----16679
1 3 6 0 5 1 s t A v e n u e N . #1 0 0
P l y m o u t h , M N 5 5 4 4 1 | a e -m n .c o m
P 7 6 3 .4 1 2 .4 0 0 0 | F 7 6 3 .4 1 2 .4 0 9 0
A n d e r s o n E n g i n e e r i n g o f M i n n e s o t a , L L C
DRAWING TITLE
CHECKED BY:DRAWN:DESIGNED:
REVISION LOG
DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONSNO.DATE
JUNE 10, 2022
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
PRINT NAME:
SIGNATURE:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE
OF MINNESOTA.
DATE:LICENSE NO.06/10/2022
PRINT NAME:
SIGNATURE:
DATE:LICENSE NO.
MEDINA AUTO
CONDOS
MEDINA
MINNESOTA
SH VENTURES INC
925 EXCELSIOR BLVD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
LEE R. KOPPY, PE
41267
66' RIGHT OF WAY
66' PROPOSED
RIGHT OF WAY
OUTLOT A
PI
O
N
E
E
R
T
R
A
I
L
MN STATE HWY 55
P
A
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
OUTLOT
B
OUTLOT C
PROPOSED STORMWATER POND
PROPOSED
STORMWATER
POND
LOT 1
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 1
BLDG
9
BLDG
8
BLDG 1
BLDG
2
BLDG
3
BLDG
5
BLDG
4
BLDG
7
BLDG
6
0 80'160'
N
UTILITY PLAN
C4
LEGEND
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
PROPOSED SANITARY
SERVICE
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
FITTING
PROPOSED SANITARY
MANHOLE
PROPOSED STORM INLETS
FES
PROPOSED PRIMARY
DRAINFIELD
PROPOSED ALTERNATE
DRAINFIELD
PROPOSED WELL
LOCATION
GENERAL NOTES:
1.ALL WATERMAIN ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED AT 7.5 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH FROM FINISHED GRADE
AND PROVIDE MINIMUM 10' HORIZONTAL AND 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION OF ALL WATERMAIN CROSSINGS
FROM STORM OR SANITARY SEWER. WATERMAIN TO BE INSULATED PER C.E.A.M. SPECIFICATIONS, WHERE
COVER DEPTHS CANNOT BE ACHIEVED. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER IF THERE ARE
AREAS WHERE MINIMUM COVER DEPTH CANNOT BE MET.
2.ALL NEW NON METALLIC SANITARY AND WATER SERVICE PIPE SHALL HAVE TRACER WIRE, PER
SPECIFICATIONS.
3.SUBSTITUTIONS FROM INFO. SHOWN HERON SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF
RECORD.
4.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER
SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0.
5.PVC SANITARY SEWER MUST MEET ASTM STANDARDS LISTED IN MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 4714, TABLE
701.1 AND INSTALLATION STANDARD 1. FITTINGS MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D1866, D2665, OR F794
RESPECTIVELY. JOINTS MUST BE APPROVED MECHANICAL OR PUSH-ON UTILIZING ELASTOMERIC SEAL, OR
SOLVENT WELDING USING ASTM F656 AND ASTM D2564. THE INSTALLATION MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D232.
6.HDPE STORM SEWERS MUST MEET ASTM F714 (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPRTER 4714, SECTION 1102.4
AND INSTALLATION STANDARD 1). WATER TIGHT JOINTS MUST BE USED AT ALL CONNECTIONS, INCLUDING
STRUCTURES. THE INSTALLATION MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D2321.
7.WATER SERVICE MATERIALS SHALL BE PVC C900. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING SERVICE SIZE
AND MATERIALS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL INSTALLED PIPE WILL REQUIRE TESTING PER CITY AND
STATE REQUIREMENTS. THIS WILL INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, CONDUCTIVITY AND PRESSURE TESTING, AS
WELL AS TESTING FOR BACTERIA AND PROPER DISINFECTION. FOLLOW C.E.A.M. STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. INSTALL TRACER WIRE, JOINT RESTRAINTS AND THRUST
BLOCKING ON ALL WATERMAIN PIPE AND FITTING, PER CITY OF MEDINA STANDARDS.
8.SANITARY SEWER PIPE MATERIALS SHALL BE PVC SDR 26. PIPE SHALL BE INSULATED PER CITY AND
C.E.A.M. STANDARDS WHERE 7.5 FOOT COVER DEPTHS ARE NOT ACHIEVED. THIS APPLIES TO ALL
PROPOSED NEW PIPE FOR THIS PROJECT. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE WILL REQUIRE TESTING PER CITY
AND C.E.A.M. STANDARDS. THIS WILL INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, LEAKAGE AND ALIGNMENT TESTING.
9.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE WATER TIGHT. APPROVED
RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATER TIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES AND
CATCH BASINS.
P
A
PLOTTED:COMM. NO.
DRAWING NO.
----16679
1 3 6 0 5 1 s t A v e n u e N . #1 0 0
P l y m o u t h , M N 5 5 4 4 1 | a e -m n .c o m
P 7 6 3 .4 1 2 .4 0 0 0 | F 7 6 3 .4 1 2 .4 0 9 0
A n d e r s o n E n g i n e e r i n g o f M i n n e s o t a , L L C
DRAWING TITLE
CHECKED BY:DRAWN:DESIGNED:
REVISION LOG
DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONSNO.DATE
JUNE 10, 2022
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
PRINT NAME:
SIGNATURE:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE
OF MINNESOTA.
DATE:LICENSE NO.06/10/2022
PRINT NAME:
SIGNATURE:
DATE:LICENSE NO.
MEDINA AUTO
CONDOS
MEDINA
MINNESOTA
SH VENTURES INC
925 EXCELSIOR BLVD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
LEE R. KOPPY, PE
41267
66' RIGHT OF WAY
66' RIGHT OF WAY
GATE
SEPTIC DRAINFIELDS
FOR AUTO CONDOS
BLOCK 2
LOT 1
66' RIGHT OF WAY
OUTLOT A
PI
O
N
E
E
R
T
R
A
I
L
MN STATE HWY 55
P
A
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
OUTLOT
B
OUTLOT C
PROPOSED STORMWATER POND
PROPOSED
STORMWATER
POND
LOT 1
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 1
0 80'160'
N
IMPLEMENTATION
PLAN
C5
LEGEND
PROPERTY LIMITS
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
FUTURE SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
FITTING
PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE
AND CLEANOUT
PROPOSED STORM INLETS
FES
CO
PLOTTED:COMM. NO.
DRAWING NO.
----16679
1 3 6 0 5 1 s t A v e n u e N . #1 0 0
P l y m o u t h , M N 5 5 4 4 1 | a e -m n .c o m
P 7 6 3 .4 1 2 .4 0 0 0 | F 7 6 3 .4 1 2 .4 0 9 0
A n d e r s o n E n g i n e e r i n g o f M i n n e s o t a , L L C
DRAWING TITLE
CHECKED BY:DRAWN:DESIGNED:
REVISION LOG
DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONSNO.DATE
JUNE 10, 2022
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
PRINT NAME:
SIGNATURE:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE
OF MINNESOTA.
DATE:LICENSE NO.06/10/2022
PRINT NAME:
SIGNATURE:
DATE:LICENSE NO.
MEDINA AUTO
CONDOS
MEDINA
MINNESOTA
SH VENTURES INC
925 EXCELSIOR BLVD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
LEE R. KOPPY, PE
41267
66' RIGHT OF WAY
GATE
60' RIGHT OF WAY
VACATE
SEPTIC
DRAINFIELDS
VACATE WELL
VACATE WELL
VACATE WELL
CONNECT TO FUTURE PUBLIC
SANITARY/WATER WHEN AVAILABLE
OUTLOT A
PI
O
N
E
E
R
T
R
A
I
L
MN STATE HWY 55
OUTLOT
B
OUTLOT C
PROPOSED STORMWATER POND
PROPOSED
STORMWATER
POND
LOT 1
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 1
BLDG
9
BLDG
8
BLDG 1
BLDG
2
BLDG
3
BLDG
5
BLDG
4
BLDG
7
BLDG
6
PLANTING PLAN
L1N
0 80'160'
SCALE:1 PLANTING PLAN
1" = 60' (24" x 36" PAPER SIZE)
LEGEND
PROPERTY LIMITS
ADJACENT PROPERTY
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
NEW NATIVE SEED BUFFER MIX
MNDOT 35-221
NEW NATIVE SEED MIX
MNDOT 33-261
NEW TURF SEED MIX
MNDOT 25-131
3" DEEP, SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH
COMMERCIAL GRADE POLY EDGER2
1.REFER TO PLAN SHEET L2 FOR SODDING, SEEDING, FERTILIZER
AND TOPSOIL NOTES
2.ALL LANDSCAPING DISTURBED BEYOND THE NEW PLANTINGS
SHALL BE REPLACED IN KIND.
NOTES
1
PLOTTED:COMM. NO.
DRAWING NO.
----16679
1 3 6 0 5 1 s t A v e n u e N . #1 0 0
P l y m o u t h , M N 5 5 4 4 1 | a e -m n .c o m
P 7 6 3 .4 1 2 .4 0 0 0 | F 7 6 3 .4 1 2 .4 0 9 0
A n d e r s o n E n g i n e e r i n g o f M i n n e s o t a , L L C
DRAWING TITLE
CHECKED BY:DRAWN:DESIGNED:
REVISION LOG
DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONSNO.DATE
JUNE 10, 2022
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
JEFFREY W. DEITNER, PLA
51899
PRINT NAME:
SIGNATURE:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS
OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
DATE:LICENSE NO.
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
MEDINA AUTO
CONDOS
MEDINA
MINNESOTA
SH VENTURES INC
925 EXCELSIOR BLVD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
06/10/2022
GATE
LANDSCAPED BERM:
-EARTHEN BERM
-SELECT SPECIMEN TREES TO BE SPADED
-MIX OF UNDERSTORY AND OVER STORY
DECIDUOUS, CONIFEROUS TREES.
PLANT QUANTITIES
OVERSTORY / CONIFEROUS TREES: 149
(2 1
2" CAL. MIN.) / (6'HT. MIN)
ORNAMENTAL TREES: 53
(1 1
2" CAL OR 6' HT. MULTI-STEM MIN.)
CONIFEROUS TREES: 75
(6'HT. MIN)
SHRUBS: 315
(#5 CONT. MIN.)
PICNIC
SHELTER
PID: 0511823220005
Medina, MN
PID: 0511823220005
Medina, MN
LEVEL 1
0"
LEVEL 2
11' - 6"
ROOF
22' - 0"
T.O. PARAPET
27' - 0"
10
'
-
6
"
F
L
O
O
R
T
O
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
36
"
J
O
I
S
T
1/4" / 1' - 0"1/4" / 1' - 0"
ROOFTOP AIR CONDITIONER, 1 PER UNIT
10
'
-
0
3
/
4
"
F
L
O
O
R
T
O
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
16
"
J
O
I
S
T
22
'
-
0
"
STODDARD COMPANIES | AUTO CONDOS
10/25/2021
BUILDING SECTION &
ROOF PLANBUILDING ADDRESS
3/8" = 1'-0"1.0
1 BUILDING SECTION
1
1.0
1
1.0
1/16" = 1'-0"1.0
2 ROOF PLAN
LEVEL 1
0"
LEVEL 2
11' - 6"
ROOF
22' - 0"
T.O. PARAPET
27' - 0"
10
'
-
6
"
F
L
O
O
R
T
O
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
36
"
J
O
I
S
T
1/4" / 1' - 0"1/4" / 1' - 0"
OPTION:SOLAR ARRAY
ROOFTOP AIR CONDITIONER, 1 PER UNIT
10
'
-
0
3
/
4
"
F
L
O
O
R
T
O
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
16
"
J
O
I
S
T
22
'
-
0
"
1
1.0
1
1.0
3/8" = 1'-0"1.0
1 BUILDING SECTION
1/16" = 1'-0"1.0
2 ROOF PLAN
LEVEL 1
0"
LEVEL 2
11' - 6"
ROOF
22' - 0"
T.O. PARAPET
27' - 0"
10
'
-
6
"
F
L
O
O
R
T
O
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
36
"
J
O
I
S
T
1/4" / 1' - 0"1/4" / 1' - 0"
OPTION:SOLAR ARRAY
10
'
-
0
3
/
4
"
F
L
O
O
R
T
O
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
16
"
J
O
I
S
T
22
'
-
0
"
1
1.0
1
1.0
3/8" = 1'-0"1.0
1 BUILDING SECTION
1/16" = 1'-0"1.0
2 ROOF PLAN
LEVEL 1
0"
LEVEL 2
11' - 6"
ROOF
22' - 0"
T.O. PARAPET
27' - 0"
10
'
-
6
"
F
L
O
O
R
T
O
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
36
"
J
O
I
S
T
1/4" / 1' - 0"1/4" / 1' - 0"
10
'
-
0
3
/
4
"
F
L
O
O
R
T
O
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
16
"
J
O
I
S
T
22
'
-
0
"
1
1.0
1
1.0
3/8" = 1'-0"1.0
1 BUILDING SECTION
1/16" = 1'-0"1.0
2 ROOF PLAN
PID: 0511823220005
Medina, MN
PID: 0511823220005
Medina, MN
Quad-City Agreement Page 1 of 3 August 3, 2022
Independence Request City Council Meeting
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director and Steve Scherer, Public Works Director
DATE: July 28, 2022
MEETING: August 3, 2022 City Council
SUBJ: Quad City Sewer Agreement – Independence Request
Background
On July 13, staff met with Mark Kaltsas, Independence City Administrator, related to a request
for additional sewer units for a residential development south of Lake Independence, northwest
of County Road 19 and Perkinsville Road.
Medina operates a sanitary sewer main along County Road 19/County Road 29 into which the
cities of Greenfield, Independence, and Loretto also discharge wastewater. The system includes
a lift station and forcemain for a portion of the distance and gravity sewer for most of the
distance. The portion of the system operated by Medina extends from the Met Council
connection point just to the southwest of Medina’s border to a point just north of Ardmore
Avenue. Independence operates the system north of its border with the City of Greenfield. A
map of the sewer system is attached for reference. The property proposed for development in
Independence is highlighted on the map.
Medina and Independence are reimbursed for certain costs of operating the system by the
Metropolitan Council beginning in 2020, when the cities agreed for Loretto to connect to the
system. The communities entered into the “Quad-City Agreement” to describe the terms and
conditions of utilizing and operating the system.
The Quad-City Agreement set a maximum number of units which communities would connect to
different portions of the system.
Agenda Item #7B
Quad-City Agreement Page 2 of 3 August 3, 2022
Independence Request City Council Meeting
Independence has requested an additional 26 connections for a new residential development
south of Lake Independence. These units would be in addition to 41 connections already
allowed south of Lake Independence and 274 units from the north.
Staff Review
In the past, staff has generally recommended not adding a significant number of units to the
system. The intent of Greenfield and Independence extending sewer was primarily to bail out
septic systems on small lots adjacent to Lake Sarah and Lake Independence to protect the lakes.
Allowing Loretto to connect so they could discontinue use of their aging wastewater treatment
ponds had similar water quality goals.
In addition, most of the units from the other communities connect upstream of Medina’s lift
station. Increased flows in the lift station result in increased operational costs and depreciation
of equipment.
The current request would not affect the lift station because it is located downstream from the lift
station.
Staff has identified the following potential considerations:
1) Capacity of gravity of sewer main
Staff does not anticipate that the additional 26 units should cause capacity concerns with the
existing sewer main because it is a comparatively small amount compared to the 1000 units
currently in the system. However, staff recommends that the capacity be analyzed for
existing flow and anticipated future increases. Most significantly, Medina has identified land
for future multiple family development of approximately 150 units near Highway 12 that
would need future capacity.
2) Potential of “opening the door” to additional requests for units for new development
While this request may not cause capacity concerns when considered on its own, staff does
have some concern that approving units for new development in one location may encourage
Independence or other communities to request more units for new development. Staff would
continue to discourage this, especially upstream from Medina’s lift station.
3) Metering of wastewater flows
Staff recommends that the ability and accuracy of metering of the flow from Independence in
this area be reviewed. Wastewater in the system is currently metered at various entry points,
and the total is metered by the Met Council at Medina’s connection. Medina’s flows are not
metered, and so we essentially pay for the “remainder” after the other meters have been
subtracted. As a result, it is important that the other communities meter as accurately as
possible, especially for inflow and infiltration (I&I) during peaks. If Independence’s request
were to proceed, staff would recommend review.
4) Consistency of density requirements
The proposed development in Independence is relatively low-density (less than 1 unit/acre).
Medina is required to maintain a minimum density of 3 units/acre for residential
development connecting to the regional wastewater system and maximum density of 1
Quad-City Agreement Page 3 of 3 August 3, 2022
Independence Request City Council Meeting
unit/10 acres for rural lots. Greenfield and Independence have both expressed interest in
additional units for development of 1-3 acre lots. While it is not Medina’s responsibility to
regulate regional planning requirements, staff has been concerned with the inconsistent
development expectations. The benefits of sewer service (lots smaller than 10 acres) are
being requested without the density expectation.
In this case Independence has indicated that they are not requesting an exemption from the
density requirements for the extension. While this proposed development is only
approximately 1 unit/acre, Independence staff has indicated that they have identified higher
density development in other locations to average to 3 units/acre. Staff would recommend
that this information be provided for review, but then would not see this matter as an issue.
5) Payment of Medina staff and consultant expenses
Analyzing capacity, reviewing metering quality, and drafting and reviewing the amendment
to the agreement will accrue staff and consultant costs. Staff believes the developer, or the
City of Independence, should reimburse those expenses since the need for the amendment is
solely because of their new proposed development. Any improvements necessary for
metering should also be the responsibility of the developer or Independence.
Council Feedback Requested
Allowing the additional units will require a formal amendment to the Quad-City Agreement,
approved by all four cities. Staff wanted to provide Council’s feedback to Independence early so
they can decide how to proceed with the development request.
Based on the considerations noted above, staff does not oppose providing the additional units.
The flow would enter the system downstream of the lift station and Independence has indicated
that they are balancing the density within their Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Staff
does have some concern that allowing additional units in this case will encourage additional
requests. However, staff believes this property can be differentiated from others north of
Medina’s lift station, and developable property adjacent to the existing main is limited south of
Lake Independence.
If the request for additional units were to move forward, staff would recommend the following:
1) Analysis of pipe capacity downstream from additional units
2) Review of metering ability at Independence connection point; Independence to make
whatever upgrades desired by Medina staff
3) Independence to provide information on planned MUSA density
4) Independence (or developer) to reimburse for costs accrued by Medina in reviewing
request and amending agreement
Attachments
1) Map of Quad-City sewer system (Exhibit A to Quad-City Agreement)
2) Quad-City Agreement (w/o exhibits)
3) Site Plan of proposed development
!(
«LS
!(
!(")!(!(
!(
«LS
")
«LS
")
«LS
«LS
!(Pipe E
Pipe C1
Pipe C2
Cleanout Manhole
MCES LiftStation MH12
MH22
MH2 3
OutletConnectionNo. 2 (MH 23a)
MH29
Air ReleaseManhole
OutletConnectionNo. 1LS-3
LS-5
Gree nfieldConnectionLS-1
LS-2
LS-4
Loretto L if t Sta tionLS-6
LorettoConnection
MH27
Pipe D5
PipeD2
Pipe D 6
P i p eD3
P
i
p
e
D
1
Pipe B
Pipe A
P i p eD4
Pipe F
CorcoranGreenfield
Independence
Loretto
Maple Plain
Medina
Orono
¾¾Ç55
£¤12
456719
456711
456783
456724
456729
456790
4567115
4567201
Budd Ave
CSAH 19
L
a
k
e
s
h
o
r
eAve
CSAH 90
W Main St
Pagenkopf Rd
E Main St
S L a k e Sarah D r
CSAH 11
Chippewa RdSunsetLa
Budd St
Tu rn e r Rd
W o o d h i l l L a
Pioneer Tr
CSAH 24
Becker Rd Inde
pe
nde
nce
Rd
Hamel Rd
Townline Rd
La ke SarahH
e
i
g
h
tsDr
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
Tr
TomahawkTr
Q u a a s C uto ff R d
Fo gl eman R d
Ihduhapi Tr
QUAD CITY AGREEMENT
Sanitary Sewer Exhibit A
3,250 0 3,2501,625
Feet
±
Path: L:\0846\0846-0011\mxd\Sanitary Sewer.mxdDate: 8/14/2019 Time: 3:12:13 PM User: BerK A1064
JUL 2019
Leg en d
Municipal Boundaries
Proposed Sanitary Sewer
Existing Sanitary Sewer
!(Manhole
")Connection
«LS Lift Station
!(
!(
")
!(
!(
!(
MH22
MH23
OutletConnectionNo. 2 (MH23a)
MH27
MH29456719
DrakeSt
CSAH 19
Sycamore Tr
P i p e D 2
Pipe D5
Pipe E
Pipe D3
Pipe D4
MEDINA/INDEPENDENCE/GREENFIELD/LORETTO
QUAD -CITY AGREEMENT
THIS QUAD -CITY AGREEMENT is made and entered into this E O day of St�/�$ , 2019,
by and among the City of Medina, ("Medina"), the City of Independence ("Independence"), the City of
Greenfield ("Greenfield"), and the City of Loretto ("Loretto"), all Minnesota municipal corporations located
in Hennepin County, Minnesota (collectively, the "Quad -Cities").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Medina, Independence, and Greenfield (the "Tri-Cities") entered into an agreement
(the "Original Tri-City Agreement") on the 9th day of April, 1985, for the purpose of outlining the
conditions under which Independence had the right to install and connect sanitary sewer facilities to
Medina's sanitary sewer system, and the Tri-Cities agreed to maintenance and service procedures and
cost sharing related thereto; and
WHEREAS, the Tri-City Agreement was amended by the First Amendment on the 5th day of April,
1994 and the Second Amendment on the 20th day of July, 2010 (as amended, the "Tri-City Agreement");
and
WHEREAS, the Tri-City Agreement permits Independence and Greenfield to make certain
connections and discharge specified amounts of septate or sewage into Medina's sanitary sewer
facilities; and
WHEREAS, Loretto has requested to connect its sanitary sewer system to the existing sanitary
sewer facilities described in the Tri-City Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Tri-City Agreement contemplated the need for an amendment to accommodate
Loretto's connection; and
WHEREAS, reimbursement for some operation and maintenance costs of the shared sanitary
sewer facilities will be made by the Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services (MCES); and
WHEREAS, in recognition of the foregoing, the Quad -Cities wish to enter into this new agreement
(the "Quad City Agreement") and terminate the Tri-City Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration for the understandings and promises set forth herein, it is
mutually agreed by the Quad -Cities as follows:
AGREEMENT
SECTION I. DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this Quad -City Agreement, the following words and
phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them.
Subd. 1 Outlet Connection No. 1 is at the Medina lift station (LS -3) on the north end of Baker Park,
as shown on Exhibit A.
Subd. 2 Outlet Connection No. 2 is a point in the trunk line where Pipe E from Independence
connects with Pipe D4, as shown on Exhibit A.
1
Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 August 3, 2022
City Council Meeting
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: July 28, 2022
MEETING: August 3, 2022 City Council
SUBJECT: Planning Department Updates
Land Use Application Review
A) Life-Style Auto Condo – South of Hwy 55, west of Pioneer – SH Ventures has requested
review of a PUD Concept Plan for development of 9 buildings with approximately 218,740
square feet of space for privately owned garage condos. The Planning Commission and City
Council had previously reviewed a larger proposal of 12 buildings with approximately 258,000
square feet and generally did not express support for the proposed rezoning. The Planning
Commission held a public hearing and provided comments at the July 12 meeting. Generally,
Commissioners did not believe the PUD was consistent with the Comp Plan or the purpose of
the PUD district. Staff intends to present to Council on August 3.
B) Hamel Townhomes Final Plat – 342 Hamel Rd – Hamel Townhomes, LLC has requested final
plat approval for a 30-unit townhome development. The City Council is tentatively scheduled
to review at the August 16 meeting.
C) Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial – Loram and Scannell have submitted materials for the City
to prepare an EAW for a warehouse/industrial development east of Arrowhead Drive, south of
Highway 55, to the south of Loram’s existing facility. The council approved the findings of fact
and made a negative declaration on the need for an EIS at the April 5 meeting. Staff will route
the record of decision as required. The applicant has now also applied for preliminary plat and
site plan review approval for construction of approximately 450,000 s.f. of office warehouse on
three lots. Staff is conducting preliminary review and will present when complete, potentially at
the August 10 Planning Commission Meeting.
D) 500 Hamel Road Apartment Concept Plan – Medina Apartments LLC has requested review of
a concept plan review for development of a 97-unit apartment building at 500 Hamel Rd. A
public hearing is tentatively scheduled for the August 10 Planning Commission meeting.
E) Weston Woods Height PUD Amendment – The developer has requested an amendment to the
Weston Woods PUD to increase the maximum height allowed for homes on the single-family
lots in the southern portion of the development from 32 feet to 36 feet. A public hearing is
tentatively scheduled for the August 10 Planning Commission meeting.
F) Adam’s Pest Control Final Plat – Jan Har LLC has requested final plat approval for a two lot
subdivision for development of an office north of Hwy 55 and west of Willow Drive. The
property owner to the east of the site has not agreed to provide right-of-way, so the applicant
proposes access directly to Highway 55. Staff is conducting preliminary review and will present
to Council when complete, potentially at the September 6 meeting.
G) Pioneer Highlands Preliminary Plat – Onyx Performance Investment LLC has requested
approval of a 4-lot rural subdivision located on approximately 67 acres south of Pioneer Trail,
east of Willow Drive. The application is incomplete for review and staff has requested
additional information.
H) Elam Accessory Structure CUP – 1582 Homestead Tr. – Tim and Megan Elam have requested
a conditional use permit for construction of a barn/storage building with a footprint of
MEMORANDUM
Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 August 3, 2022
City Council Meeting
approximately 10,000 s.f. The application is incomplete for review and staff has requested
additional information.
I) Cates Ranch/Willow Drive Warehouse Industrial – Comprehensive Plan Amendment– Jeff and
Chris Cates have submitted an amendment request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for a
warehouse/industrial development east of Willow Drive, north of Chippewa Road. The
amendment proposes to change the future land use of approximately 30 acres from Future
Development Area to Business for an approximately 300,000 s.f. development. The Council
adopted a resolution granting preliminary approval and authorizing submission to Met Council
at the July 17 meeting. Staff has submitted to Met Council for review.
J) Blooming Meadows Concept Plan – east of Holy Name Drive, north of Lakeview Drive – Pillar
Homes has requested review of a Concept Plan Review for a 5-lot rural subdivision. The
applicant proposes a PUD and requests flexibility from the Rural Residential zoning standards.
Standard RR zoning would permit 5 lots on the subject site, but the applicant proposes
alternative lot arrangement to allow for wetland restoration in a large portion of the site and
creation of a wetland bank. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 14 and
was generally supportive of the concept. Council provided comments on June 21. Staff will
await a formal application.
K) Prairie Creek Final Plat – Stelter Enterprises has requested final plat approval for a 17-lot villa
subdivision at 500 Hamel Road. The applicant is re-evaluating their plans and staff will present
to Council when and if the applicant is prepared to move ahead.
L) Ditter Heating and Cooling Site Plan Review – 820 Tower Drive – Ditter Heating and Cooling
has requested a Site Plan Review for an approximately 5,000 square foot addition to its building.
The application is incomplete for review and will be scheduled for a hearing when complete.
M) BAPS Site Plan Review – 1400 Hamel Road – Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam
Swaminarayan Sanstha (BAPS), Minneapolis, has requested Site Plan Review for construction
of a place of assembly. The Planning Commission reviewed at the September 14 meeting and
recommended approval. The Council adopted a resolution for approval at the November 16
meeting. The applicant has indicated that they will likely not begin construction until spring.
N) Adam’s Pest Control Site Plan Review, Pre Plat, Rezoning – Pioneer Trail Preserve – These
projects have been preliminarily approved and the City is awaiting final plat application.
O) Baker Park Townhomes, Johnson ADU CUP, St. Peter and Paul Cemetery – The City
Council has adopted resolutions approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants
with the conditions of approval in order to complete the projects.
Other Projects
A) Uptown Hamel RFP – Two separate roundtable discussions have been scheduled with the
Uptown Hamel Business Association and property owners of land within Uptown Hamel
B) CR19 Sewer/Quad-City Agreement – Independence Request – staff met with City of
Independence staff related to their request for 26 additional sewer connections for a proposed
residential development northwest of County Road 19 and Perkinsville Road. Staff is
evaluating capacity and implications of providing additional units and intends to seek City
Council direction at the August 3 meeting.
C) Industrial Park Integrated Development Ordinance – staff is recommending amendments to
the Industrial Park zoning district to address “integrated development” where multiple buildings
are proposed to be developed together but platted on separate lots to be owned separately, but
still subject to an association. Staff intends to present to Planning Commission for a hearing on
August 10.
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jason Nelson, Director of Public Safety
DATE: July 28, 2022
RE: Police Department Update
Our department held its first ever Cops ‘n Bobber’s fishing event on Lake Minnetonka. While I may
have come up with the idea for the event, Officers Vinck and McGill took my idea and worked very
hard to make it a reality with the assistance of many. The day turned out better than I could have
imagined. There were 14 youth that decided to spend the day with the police officers. It was truly
amazing to be part of and witness the smiles on the faces of these kids. This was a great event that we
will make into an annual event. We have even discussed the possibility of doing an ice fishing event.
More to come on that in the future.
The department is currently running short-handed with one Community Service Officer vacancy, one
officer vacancy and one officer that has been on medical leave since December. Community Service
Officer Billman has also advised that he has received a conditional offer from the Brooklyn Center
Police Department for the position of police officer after he takes and passes his POST licensing test in
August of this year. Officers continue to pick up the slack and are doing extra duties to ensure there is
no disruption to day-to-day services. We are hoping to interview Community Service Officer
candidates next week. We have had minimal interest to this point after three weeks of ads. This is
something that is being experienced not only in these non-sworn positions but also with sworn officer
positions as there is a lack of candidates and current enrollment in college is down significantly. We
will continue to recruit for the vacancies and bring forward ideas on recruitment and retention to
council in the future.
Nite-to-Unite is Tuesday, August 2. We have approximately 15 different parties that are signed up at
this point. Investigator Scharf is working on finalizing those parties and putting a schedule together
for officers and staff to attend those parties. As always, we invite the Mayor and Council to come and
ride with the staff and myself as we attend the parties. It is always fun to see community members in
their neighborhoods. Please reach out to me if you are interested in coming along with myself or staff.
Patrol:
The following are updates of Patrol Officers between July 13, 2022 and July 25, 2022: Officers issued
11 citations and 21 warnings for various traffic offenses, responded to 3 property damage accidents, 11
medicals, 5 suspicious calls, 5 traffic complaints, 4 assists to other agencies, and 5 business/residential
alarms.
On 07/13/2022 Officer was dispatched to the area of Railway Street West in Loretto on a report of
some sort of liquid having been dumped by a truck driving down the street. The officer arrived and
did locate liquid on the roadway but appeared to be only water. The officer believed water from recent
rainfall was coming off the truck as it drove down the street. No issue found.
On 07/14/2022 Officer was dispatched to found property in the 1400 block of Willow Drive. A
license plate was turned over which was found to belong to the City of Medina Public Works. The
plate was believed to have fallen off a trailer. It was returned to Public Works.
On 07/14/2022 Officers responded to assist Corcoran PD with an injury accident on Highway 55 near
County Road 19. A motorcycle was found to have rear-ended a stopped vehicle. Officers assisted
with medical care until Corcoran Officers arrived on scene.
On 07/14/2022 Officers were dispatched to a suspicious vehicle that had pulled into the driveway in
the 100 block of Hillview Lane in Loretto. While in route the caller called back and reported that it
was an Amazon delivery driver and requested Officers to cancel.
On 07/17/2022 Officer was dispatched to a traffic complaint regarding a driver that had left a
residence on Phillips Drive. Resident reported his roommate had left intoxicated and was following
him. The caller continued to provide updates and the officer located the vehicle which had pulled over
along Meadowwoods Trail. The driver was found to be intoxicated and was placed under arrest for
DWI. He was processed at the Medina Police Department and then transported to Hennepin County
Jail.
On 07/18/2022 Officer was dispatched to an assault report at Subway along Baker Park Road. Victim
reported stopping by Subway with a friend when he got into a verbal argument with another patron.
That other person struck him in the face and jaw before leaving. The victim was able to provide a
license plate of the vehicle that the suspect left the scene driving but declined to pursue any charges.
He was advised to call back if he changed his mind.
On 07/18/2022 Officer was dispatched for an agency assist to Sartell Police Department. Officer
reported looking for assistance with the identification of a female theft suspect that had left a business
in a vehicle that registers to an address in Medina. The officer was able to email photos of the suspect
in the case. The suspect was identified through photos sent as a known associate of the registered
owner of the vehicle she had left in. Sartell Police was going to mail a citation for theft to the suspect.
On 07/20/2022 Officer was dispatched to a traffic complaint that was eastbound on Highway 55 from
Pinto Drive. It was reported a vehicle was “out of control” driving all over the road, varying speeds,
stopping at green lights. The officer located and stopped the vehicle near County Road 101 in
Plymouth. The female driver was found to be intoxicated and was arrested for DWI. She was
processed at the Medina Police Department and transported to Hennepin County Jail.
On 07/22/2022 Officer was dispatched to a traffic complaint eastbound on Highway 55 from
Arrowhead Drive. It was reported a black pickup was all over the road. The officer located and
stopped the vehicle. The driver was found to be intoxicated and had two young children in the car at
the time. The driver was arrested for DWI. He was processed at the Medina Police Department and
then transported to Hennepin County Jail. The children were transported to the Medina Police
Department and their mother was contacted to come and pick them up.
On 07/25/2022 at 0453 hours an officer was dispatched to suspicious activity in the 4300 block of
Fairway Drive. A resident reported someone walked up to their house with a flashlight and then back
to a vehicle and left. The officer checked the area but was unable to locate the vehicle. The
homeowner called back and said they had found a package on their front step that hadn’t been there
the evening before and believed that person may have delivered the package and there was no longer
an issue.
Investigations:
Follow-up to a theft of $500 from a business in Nebraska, the suspects were contacted, and the money
was returned.
Follow-up to a financial transaction card fraud, the suspect was found to be using the purchased Target
gift cards in Los Angeles. Investigation ongoing.
Received a report of a property damage hit and run where the victim’s vehicle was struck at a local
business. Video was obtained and a suspect vehicle has been identified. Working with the owner to
determine who was driving.
There are currently 12 cases assigned to investigations.
1
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director
DATE: July 28, 2022
MEETING: August 3, 2022
SUBJECT: Public Works Update
STREETS
• The Arrowhead/Highway 55 intersection is looking great. As usual, there have
been a few unexpected expenses. We expect a road base correction, a signal
camera, and a couple other items will use up most or all the contingency on the
project.
• The Chippewa Road connection is moving along. The street is open to the
Bridgewater area. The water main was successfully relocated and is back in
service. It won’t be long before we have the secondary line to Mohawk in service
as well.
• I have been working to gather quotes for the watermain extension along
Chippewa west of Polaris to Oaklee. The goal is to extend the watermain to
Willow Drive in the next year or two either through development or connection
fees.
WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER
• Water usage remains up and the plant is keeping up with demand. Staff monitors
the drought index; Medina is in the “moderate drought” phase (which is typical
for July in Minnesota).
• Bid specifications are being put together for the media replacement in the water
treatment plant.
• Staff has received a proposal for $21,250 to complete the Wellhead Protection
plan that is due by 2023. It is a time-consuming process to prepare the
delineations and vulnerability assessments as is required by the Minnesota
Department of Health. We are pursuing grant funding to cover the additional cost
of implementing the plan once it is completed.
PARKS/TRAILS
• Public Works is making progress on the renovations at Hunter Park. The asphalt
is installed on the new court. The interior poles will be installed soon and
followed by the surface coating and fencing. Public works plans to prep and seed
the ballfield by mid-August.
MEMORANDUM
2
• The parks are very busy this time of year. It has been a great help to have our part
time public works technician handle the uptick in demand. It is also great to see
increase usage at the parks.
• The Arrowhead intersection project is nearly complete and includes a trail on the
east side of the intersection along with an upgraded crossing at HWY 55. We
have trail work to complete on the north end of the Marsh Pointe development
and the Chippewa extension.
• Soon we’ll have a connection to the Medina Lake Preserve which prompts the
Park Commission to begin discussion on park improvement planning in the years
to come.
MISC
• Greg Leuer and I are working to review and update the City Safety Manual to
bring it up to current standards. It has been several years since this has been done
and I’ve engaged the Minnesota Safety Council to help with the process. I do not
take safety lightly - Public Works is regularly exposed to hazards, no matter what
they are working on. There are many chapters in the manual to be reviewed.
ORDER CHECKS JULY 19, 2022 – AUGUST 3, 2022
053205 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN ................................... $40,532.99
053206 CASH ............................................................................................. $66.98 POLICE PETTY CASH
053207 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC ............................................... $85.54
053208 ENCLAVE PATRIOT HOA .......................................................... $250.00
053209 DANIEL & KATIE GELFAND ....................................................... $295.96
053210 GUARDIAN FLEET SUPPLY LLC ............................................... $346.04
053211 HALIM, MOHAMMED SABBIR .................................................... $250.00
053212 HAMEL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT ........................................ $89,187.50
053213 HEINTZ, STEVEN/ELLIE .............................................................. $95.99
053214 KAIMAL, GEETA ......................................................................... $950.00
053215 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT INC .......................................... $39.50
053216 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL .................................................. $56,583.45
053217 METRO WEST INSPECTION ................................................ $29,638.08
053218 MN DEPT OF LABOR/INDUSTRY ........................................... $8,962.10
053219 NEW LOOK CONTRACTING INC ........................................ $197,579.57
053220 PARAKKUTH, JAYAPAL ............................................................. $500.00
053221 PREMIUM WATERS INC .............................................................. $27.68
053222 PUNJABI, GOPAL ....................................................................... $250.00
053223 RAMASWAMY, SRIDHAR .......................................................... $250.00
053224 SINGH, ASHWANI....................................................................... $500.00
053225 VOID ................................................................................................ $0.00 CORRECTION
053226 WESTLING, MICHAEL/CALLI .................................................. $1,050.00
053227 APPICELLI, ANNA/AARON ......................................................... $500.00
053228 CIRCLE K FLEET ........................................................................ $234.04
053229 COYLE, BARBARA ..................................................................... $500.00
053230 FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL ........................................ $500.00
053231 KUMAR, HEMANT ...................................................................... $250.00
053232 US HOME CORP ................................................................... $10,000.00
053233 REITER, SHARON ................................................................... $1,050.00
053234 SAJJAD, ZAHRA/ALI ................................................................... $250.00
053235 TITLESMART, INC ...................................................................... $100.00
053236 UPSHER-SMITH LABORATORIES ............................................ $250.00
053237 VELAGAPUDI, MOHAN .............................................................. $600.00
053238 WSB & ASSOCIATES ............................................................ $68,244.83
053239 BEAUDRY OIL & PROPANE ................................................... $2,496.94
053240 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. ................................................ $5,043.00
053241 VOID ................................................................................................ $0.00 CORRECTION
053242 DINIUS FENCE LLC ............................................................... $13,220.00
053243 DDA HUMAN RESOURCES INC ................................................ $300.00
053244 DORGLASS, INC......................................................................... $835.00
053245 ECM PUBLISHERS INC .............................................................. $382.81
053246 EHLERS & ASSOC INC. .......................................................... $6,600.00
053247 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO. ................................................. $530.00
053248 G. L. CONTRACTING.................................................................. $969.00
053249 GUARDIAN FLEET SUPPLY LLC ............................................... $724.01
053250 HACH COMPANY ....................................................................... $405.00
053251 HAWKINS INC. ......................................................................... $1,688.80
053252 HENN COUNTY INFO TECH ................................................... $2,347.02
053253 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER ............................................. $40.00
053254 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC .......................................................... $1,020.00
053255 KD & COMPANY RECYCLING INC ......................................... $1,383.67
053256 JOSEPH M KITTOK ................................................................. $1,005.00
053257 KRAEMER MINING AND MATERIALS ....................................... $422.47
053258 LANO EQUIPMENT INC ............................................................. $144.85
053259 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS.TRUST ......................................... $225.00
053260 MEDTOX LABS ............................................................................. $51.33
053261 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC ........................................................ $104.81
053262 NORTH MEMORIAL ...................................................................... $40.00
053263 NORTHWEST FAMILY PHYSICIANS ........................................... $52.00
053264 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTION LLC ............................................... $370.26
053265 OMANN BROTHERS PAVING INC ............................................ $558.93
053266 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES INC ................................... $8,081.09
053267 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC ......................................... $32.74
053268 STREICHER'S ............................................................................... $11.99
053269 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL ................................................................. $645.56
053270 TEGRETE CORP ..................................................................... $1,927.00
053271 TIMESAVER OFFSITE ................................................................ $344.50
053272 VOID ................................................................................................ $0.00 CORRECTION
053273 SSI MN TRANCHE 3 #10327096 ............................................. $6,991.14
053274 WESTERN ELECTRIC ................................................................ $905.00
053275 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE ................................................. $899.74
053276 CORE & MAIN LP .................................................................. $24,676.25
053277 MID AMERICA METER INC ........................................................ $100.00
053278 SSI MN TRANCHE 1 #10322006 ............................................. $5,477.48
Total Checks $600,972.64
ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS JULY 19, 2022 – AUGUST 3, 2022
006455E FURTHER................................................................................. $1,929.37
006456E PR FED/FICA ......................................................................... $20,367.13
006457E PR MN Deferred Comp ............................................................ $2,284.00
006458E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA .................................................... $4,593.59
006459E CITY OF MEDINA ......................................................................... $24.00
006460E PR PERA ................................................................................ $20,692.54
006461E AFLAC ......................................................................................... $491.08
006462E FURTHER................................................................................. $1,039.94
006463E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC ............................................................. $931.79
006464E MINNESOTA, STATE OF ......................................................... $1,964.00
006465E STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY .................................... $1,133.95
006466E XCEL ENERGY ........................................................................ $4,996.57
006467E ALL AMERICAN COMMERCIAL TITLE ............................... $897,107.25
006468E ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICE .................................................... $6,205.64
006469E FURTHER................................................................................. $2,438.29
006470E MARCO (LEASE) ........................................................................ $795.61
006471E XCEL ENERGY ........................................................................ $7,628.29
006472E CENTERPOINT ENERGY ........................................................... $432.08
006473E DELTA DENTAL ....................................................................... $2,657.46
006474E GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVI ....................................... $178.95
006475E WRIGHT HENN COOP ELEC ASSN ....................................... $2,287.07
Total Electronic Checks $980,178.60
PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT – JULY 20, 2022
0512020 BILLMAN, JACKSON CARROLL ................................................ $736.26
0512021 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L. .................................................... $1,137.76
0512022 BARNHART, ERIN A. ............................................................... $2,788.42
0512023 BOECKER, KEVIN D. ............................................................... $2,819.09
0512024 CONVERSE, KEITH A. ............................................................ $3,385.51
0512025 DEMARS, LISA ........................................................................ $1,558.38
0512026 DION, DEBRA A. ...................................................................... $2,091.51
0512027 ENDE, JOSEPH ....................................................................... $2,254.12
0512028 FINKE, DUSTIN D. ................................................................... $2,869.01
0512029 GLEASON, JOHN M................................................................. $2,245.49
0512030 GREGORY, THOMAS ................................................................. $678.15
0512031 HALL, DAVID M. ....................................................................... $2,367.58
0512032 HANSON, JUSTIN .................................................................... $2,447.29
0512033 JACOBSON, NICOLE .............................................................. $1,053.64
0512034 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S. ........................................................... $3,940.36
0512035 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. .............................................................. $2,740.19
0512036 KLAERS, ANNE M. .................................................................. $1,616.29
0512037 LEUER, GREGORY J. ............................................................. $1,918.39
0512038 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. ................................................... $2,722.75
0512039 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D ........................................................... $2,627.96
0512040 NELSON, JASON ..................................................................... $2,795.93
0512041 RATKE, TREVOR J .................................................................. $1,734.87
0512042 REINKING, DEREK M .............................................................. $2,079.82
0512043 RUTH, BRENDA L. ................................................................... $1,612.91
0512044 SCHARF, ANDREW ................................................................. $3,136.47
0512045 SCHERER, STEVEN T. ........................................................... $2,527.21
0512046 VINCK, JOHN J ........................................................................ $1,901.43
0512047 VOGEL, DOMINIC A ................................................................... $988.81
0512048 VOGEL, NICHOLE ................................................................... $1,009.22
0512049 WALKER, CAITLYN M. ............................................................ $1,872.48
0512050 BURSCH, JEFFREY ................................................................ $1,300.43
Total Payroll Direct Deposit $64,957.73