Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
08.17.2022 Park Commission Meeting Packet
Posted 8/12/2022 Page 1of 1 AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE MEDINA PARK COMMISSION Wednesday, August 17, 2022 7:00 P.M. Medina City Hall 2052 County Road 24 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. Minutes of the June 15, 2022 Regular Park Commission Meeting 4. CITY COUNCIL UPDATE 5. LORAM/SCANNELL PROPERTIES –Preliminary Plat for subdivision of three lots and development of warehouse/office/industrial on 25 acres – east of Arrowhead Dr., south of Hwy 55 6. GRANDSTAND PROPOSAL – Hamel Athletic Club (HAC) and Hamel Hawks grandstand proposal for Paul Fortin Field at Hamel Legion Park 7. PARK OVERVIEW/UPDATE a. Lakeshore Park Improvement Discussion b. Maple Park Improvement Discussion 8. GOALS / VISION / STRATEGIC PLANNING / STREAMLINING OF PARK REQUESTS 9. MUNICIPAL PARK FUND / ASSET INVENTORY / GRANTS / FUNDING NEEDS 10. STAFF REPORT a. Youth Park Commission Status b. 2022 Field Reservation Update c. Park Maintenance Update d. Parkland Acquisition Update e. Park Commission Representation at City Council Meetings 11. ADJOURN Meeting Rules of Conduct to Address the Park Commission: x Fill out & turn in comment card x Give name and address x Indicate if representing a group x Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT June 15, 2022 Page 1 of 4 1 The Park Commission of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on June 15, 2022 at 7:00 p.m. in the 2 City Hall Council Chambers. Park Commission Chair Mary Morrison presided. 3 1. CALL TO ORDER 4 5 Members present: Mary Morrison, Terry Sharp, Nila Norman, Angela Bernhardt, Troy 6 Hutchinson 7 Members absent: Will Gunter, Steve Webster 8 Youth Members present: Katya Cavanaugh 9 Youth Members absent: None 10 11 Also present: Public Works Director Steve Scherer, Public Works Assistant Lisa 12 DeMars, Planning Director Dusty Finke, and Councilmember Joe 13 Cavanaugh 14 15 2. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA 16 17 None. 18 19 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 20 A. Approval of the May 18, 2022 Park Commission Meeting Minutes 21 22 A motion was made by Morrison and seconded by Sharp to approve the April 20, 2022 Regular Park 23 Commission meeting minutes as presented. 24 25 A motion was made by Morrison and seconded by Norman to approve the May 18, 2022 Special Park 26 Commission meeting minutes as presented. 27 28 A roll call vote was performed: 29 30 Bernhardt aye 31 Hutchinson aye 32 Norman aye 33 Sharp aye 34 Morrison aye 35 Webster absent 36 Gunter absent 37 38 4. HAMEL ATHLETIC CLUB DUGOUT REQUEST 39 40 Greg DeVos, incoming President of the Hamel Lions, General Manager of the Hamel Hawks, and 41 representative of the Hamel Athletic Club presented a proposal to paint the dugouts royal blue at Paul 42 Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT June 15, 2022 Page 2 of 4 Fortin Memorial Field in Hamel Legion Park. Greg explained there is a big ballgame coming up where 1 Fox9 will be present, there will be a band, food, free ice cream, and a kickoff of the Hamel Rodeo events. 2 The ballgame is streamlined on channel 9 and will include interviews, it is a big promotion for the City 3 and people from all over follow the town games. Even if only for temporary, the ball team groups would 4 like to dress up the dugouts with royal blue and white trim, as represented in the park commission packet 5 memo. 6 7 Morrison solicited the commission or questions. Bernhardt asked who is normally responsible for 8 painting the dugouts. DeVos responded maintenance was normally performed by the City, but the 9 baseball organizations, via volunteers, would pay for the blue paint and paint the dugouts themselves. 10 11 Scherer pointed out the color scheme within parks is neutral, so as not to take away from the beauty of the 12 surrounding nature. DeVos noted the their future plan for Paul Fortin Memorial Field include royal blue, 13 the color of the teams, for the scoreboards to match everything. 14 15 Sharp asked about the color of the kids’ uniforms, DeVos responded the color is the very same royal blue 16 as what they want to paint the dugouts. DeVos noted the clubs’ joint aspiration to advance kids teams 17 age brackets from fourteen to fifteen and beyond, grooming the kids to consider playing for the Hamel 18 Hawks after they turn eighteen. Sharp asked if the royal blue color scheme served as part of the identity 19 of the team, to which DeVos responded yes, exactly as the average age of the current Hawks team is 20 eighteen to thirty-five years old. 21 22 Scherer asked if the organizations future grandstand plans included blue dugouts and DeVos responded 23 they are not sure as it would depend upon funding. DeVos noted they have almost reached their 24 fundraising goal for Phase two which is the grandstand and they are looking at some stadium seating 25 which would be royal blue. 26 27 Morrison clarified the question is whether the City desires to keep the dugouts neutral color, like all other 28 features in the parks, or change the color scheme on Paul Fortin Memorial Field to royal blue, the long-29 standing color scheme of HAC and the Hawks. Morrison noted this topic came up a few years ago, and 30 was turned down. DeVos asked the Commission to allow the color, even if for temporary, even if only a 31 two-week period to spruce up the field for the townball game. 32 33 Norman commented the housing across from the dugouts may have opinion, as they would now see the 34 bright color when looking out their windows. She is all for team camaraderie and wants the people who 35 live their lives in this area represented. 36 37 Cavanaugh asked why the previous request was denied. Morrison recalled it was denied as the roofs had 38 just been replaced, maintenance of painting had just been done, and the park commission could not justify 39 spending additional funds when the building had just been painted. 40 41 Norman asked DeVos to confirm the request is to paint the dugouts blue with white trim, only. No logos 42 or letters. DeVos responded they would love to have a logo or letter, did not want to push it, would come 43 back down the road to ask this question. DeVos confirmed a logo or letter would not be painted at this 44 Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT June 15, 2022 Page 3 of 4 time. HAC’s and the Hawks are willing to paint the dugouts back to neutral colors after the Fox9 1 Townball game, if the commission would consider this request. 2 3 Hutchinson asked DeVos for a list of items HAC or the HAWKS would request of the Park Commission. 4 DeVos stated the grandstand plans and fencing would be the two items for this fall, and royal blue 5 matting around the fence. Hutchinson asked for any other items, DeVos is not sure if there are any other 6 plans in the works, but down the road might want to make other changes to make the field more uniform. 7 8 Sharp made a motion to move forward with the approval to use the appropriate type of paint to paint the 9 dugouts royal blue with white trim, while reserving the right to have the organization paint the dugouts 10 back to the neutral colors after the Fox9 game. Hutchinson seconded the motion. 11 12 Hutchinson asked DeVos for ideas to streamline requests that come through from HAC and Hawks due to 13 the amount of time consumed by City Staff. DeVos recognized the issue and said his goal is to bridge the 14 communication gaps between the organizations and streamline requests. Going forward, he expects any 15 requests to be streamlined. Scherer made note CIP planning is done in July, so any requests from HAC or 16 the Hawks should be done before July, to be considered for 2023. Bernhardt agreed many requests pop 17 up and are looking for approval and funding on the spot, without any planning. DeVos said his goal is to 18 have a four to five year plan. 19 20 Morrison mentioned concern about the Hamel Legion Park turning into a park only about baseball, and 21 not representing the other amenities. A five year plan would allow the commission to visualize and 22 consider all the other park offerings. 23 24 5. BLOOMING MEADOWS PUBLIC HEARING 25 26 Finke stated that the application proposes a PUD in order to receive flexibility on the five acres of suitable 27 soils requirement. He stated that the applicant is not proposing additional density within the subdivision 28 but to organize the lots differently. He stated that this proposal would allow restoration and the creation 29 of wetland in the center of the site. He stated that the City has not had a lot of requests for rural PUDs, 30 with the exception of the conservation design PUDs. He noted that a CD-PUD does allow for an increase 31 in density, but in this case no additional density is being requested therefore a traditional PUD was 32 proposed. He stated that the five lots would be proposed to lay around the wetland bank which would be 33 created in the center. He stated that the applicant proposes two shared driveways to serve two to three 34 lots each. He noted that each rural lot must have a primary and secondary septic site identified and noted 35 that the applicant has identified those for each of the five lots proposed. He noted that the Building 36 Official has requested that additional information be shown to confirm that the secondary sites for lots 37 one and two be confirmed as feasible. He stated that there would be an option for the applicant to change 38 the septic locations as well. He stated that the applicant intends to create a wetland bank and those credits 39 could be sold to developers for impacts on other sites in Medina. He pointed out the wetland bank and 40 ability to sell credits so the market for wetland credits gives incentive to create wetlands. 41 42 Morrison asked if a third party could buy credits. Finke responded yes noted resident desire for privacy at 43 the planning commission meeting. 44 Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT June 15, 2022 Page 4 of 4 Cavanaugh commented she lives in the area and additional wetland would be great for the environment, 1 and trail or a boardwalk would be very desirable; she is in favor of taking an easement. 2 3 The commission came to agreement and is in favor of taking the easement and suggested possible 4 connection to the Plymouth trails, years down the road. 5 6 7 6. CITY COUNCIL UPDATE 8 9 Councilmember Cavanaugh provided an update on recent City Council Actions. 10 11 7. PARK OVERVIEW / UPDATE 12 13 Commissioner Hutchinson provided an update on the meeting with Scherer and Webster regarding Lake 14 Shore Park. He noted the playground is in good condition, and the recommendation would be to leave it 15 as-is. On the north side of the boat launch a decision should be made on whether we keep the two big 16 cedar trees or remove them to make way for a deck or overlook. Seating could be installed on the north 17 side bluff. Racks could be installed for kayaks and canoes. Hutchinson proposes to explore these options 18 first and concentrate on chipping away on these recommendations. Hutchinson thought seasonal rack use 19 vs. day use because he has noticed the inconvenience of residents carrying their equipment to the lake. 20 21 Norman commented she thinks this is a good proposal and noted residents responded to a survey that 22 included a concept plan and now we are talking about items different from what we showed residents to 23 vote on. 24 25 Hutchinson noted he carefully studied the survey results and concluded the commission are stewards of 26 the park and at the end of the day has an obligation to do what is in the best interest of the park and what 27 the park is best suited for. Additional parking could be considered in the City easement, across from the 28 boat launch. Hutchinson’s vision would be to create a backyard feel for the residents in the community 29 who do not live directly on the lake. 30 31 The commission agreed that none of these suggested upgrades would interfere with future park 32 renovations, like those represented in the initial survey. 33 34 Scherer talked about the removal of buckthorn and replacing with plants to maintain stabilization on the 35 bank, and finding a source to provide a concept plan for these improvement ideas. 36 37 Hutchinson said he would touch base with Webster on concept plan cad file with new ideas. 38 39 8. STAFF REPORT 40 41 DeMars referenced the staff report within the packet and asked the commission for questions or 42 comments. The commission suggested reaching out to the family who originally donated the basketball 43 Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT June 15, 2022 Page 5 of 4 hoop and have a conversation about updates. Scherer said he would look at the condition of the existing 1 basketball hoop and see if there is room to add a smaller hoop. 2 3 Scherer gave an update on renovations at Hunter Park. 4 5 ADJOURN 6 7 A motion was made by Hutchinson, seconded by Norman, to adjourn the meeting. 8 9 A roll call vote was performed: 10 11 Bernhardt aye 12 Hutchinson aye 13 Norman aye 14 Sharp aye 15 Morrison aye 16 Webster absent 17 Gunter absent 18 19 The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Minutes prepared by Lisa De Mars. 20 Loram/Scannell Page 1 of 6 August 17, 2022 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review Park Commission Meeting TO: Park Commission FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: August 11, 2022 MEETING: August 18, 2022 Park Commission SUBJECT: Loram/Scannell Properties – Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review, CUP - PIDs 1111823230001 and 1111823220003 Summary of Request Scannell Properties and Loram have requested land use approval for development of approximately 396,000 square feet of warehouse/office space located east of Arrowhead Drive, south of Highway 55. Loram proposes to move many of its operations from other sites into the building on Lot 2. The applicant has indicated that they were hopeful some of their vendors and related businesses may occupy the other spaces in the intermediate term, but may provide additional space for Loram’s growth in the future as well. The following applications have been requested to implement the proposed construction: 1) Preliminary plat for subdivision of three lots 2) Site Plan Review for new construction 3) Conditional Use Permit for Warehouse use The subject site is predominantly farmland. There is a large wetland along the east of the subject site and six smaller wetlands located around the property. Most of the site is fairly flat, except the eastern portion which slopes to the wetland. The aerial at the top of the following page depicts the subject site and surrounding land uses as follows: x North – Loram main facility – zoned Industrial Park x South – Automotorplex – zoned PUD x West – Hennepin County Public Works facility x Southeast – BAPS temple (site plan approved, currently vacant) x East – Wayzata Schools (guided Mixed Residential) Comprehensive Plan and Zoning The property is guided for Business development in the Comprehensive Plan and staged for current development (staged after 2018). The property is zoned Industrial Park (IP). MEMORANDUM Proposed construction:396,000 s.f. Three Buildings/Lots Area: 24 acres Future Land Use: Business Staging: 2018 Current Zoning:Industrial Park $JHQGD,WHP Loram/Scannell Page 2 of 6 August 17, 2022 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review Park Commission Meeting Preliminary Plat The applicant proposes to plat the subject property into three lots. The following table compares the proposed lots to the standards of the IP District. IP Requirement Lot 1 (west lot) Lot 2 (north lot) Lot 3 (south lot) Minimum Lot Area 5 acres 7.50 acres 5.07 acres 8.79 acres Minimum Lot Width 300 feet 777 feet 322 feet 455 feet Minimum Lot Depth 300 feet 420 feet 683 feet 822 feet Transportation, Streets, Right-of-way and Access The applicant proposes a new access along the south of the property, and also to connect to and share the existing Loram access just north of the property line. Loram/Scannell Page 3 of 6 August 17, 2022 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review Park Commission Meeting Arrowhead Drive is a Hennepin County roadway (CR118), and Hennepin County recommends that a left-turn be constructed at the new southern access as part of the required site improvements. Hennepin County recommended 50-feet of right-of-way, and the preliminary plat appears to propose such dedication. The County also recommends that the existing trail along Arrowhead Drive be reconstructed and shifted to the east for increased distance from Arrowhead Drive. The trail was shifted closer to Arrowhead Drive along this property to avoid wetland impacts. Staff does not recommend relocating the trail unless it is necessary for road widening. Staff does recommend additional trail easement be required to accommodate future relocation if necessary. Wetlands The subject property is adjacent to a large wetland along the eastern property line, and six smaller wetlands are located throughout the site. The applicant proposes to impact five of the other wetlands in their entirety and much of the western wetland for a total of 1.26 acres of wetland impacts for the proposed construction. In addition, the minimum required wetland buffer widths are not provided adjacent to the areas of wetlands being impacted. Staff has recommended that wetland impacts be reduced, especially for the wetland along the western portion of the site adjacent to Arrowhead Drive, which has not been consistently farmed in recent years. The applicant proposes retaining walls immediately adjacent to the impacts on the edge of the wetlands to remain, which prevents minimum required upland buffers from being created. The wetland protection ordinance requires upland buffers with average width as described to the right: As noted above, most of the small wetland are proposed to be impacted in their entirety. Much of the western wetland is also proposed to be impacted and smaller impacts are proposed along the east of the larger wetland to the east. Remaining wetlands do not appear to provide upland buffer areas meeting the minimum buffer standards noted above. Staff recommends that the area of upland buffers be mitigated in areas which do not meet minimum standards where impacts are permitted. Floodplains No floodplains are identified by FEMA mapping on the subject property. Sewer/Water/Easements Existing sewer and water mains are located within Arrowhead Drive and along the southern property line of the subject property. Staff recommends that the sewer and water lines extended to serve the three properties remain privately owned and operated. The City Engineer has reviewed and provided comments on the utility plans, which staff recommends be addressed. Staff recommends that drainage and utility easements be provided as recommended by the City Engineer, including along the perimeter of lots, over utilities, and over wetland areas. Wetland Required buffer Large wetland to east 30 feet Other wetlands 20 feet Loram/Scannell Page 4 of 6 August 17, 2022 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review Park Commission Meeting Proposed Site Plan The applicant has indicated that the proposed uses would include predominantly warehouse space along with office space. Warehouse/distributing is an allowed conditional use in the IP district, and office is a permitted use. Proposed architectural design of the buildings is attached for informational purposes. Following is a summary comparing the proposed construction to the dimensional standards of the IP district. IP District Requirement Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 feet 150’ 75’ (W) 75’ (W) Rear Yard Setback 50 feet 60’ (E) 62’ (E) 55’ (E) Side Yard Setback 50 feet 85’ (N) 92’ (S) 73’ (N) 87’ (S) 92’ (N) 102’ (S) Setback from Residential 100 feet 332’ (SW) NA 225’ (E) Parking Setbacks Front Yard 50 feet 68’ 0’ NA Rear and Side Yard 50 feet (25’ w/ buffer) 25’ 0’ (N-shared) 25’ (S) Maximum Hardcover 70% 74% (all lots) 74% (all lots) 74% (all lots) Building Height 35 feet 35’ 37’ 37’ Park Dedication Park Dedication – Ordinance Requirements City’s subdivision regulations require up to one of the following amounts to be dedicated for parks, trails, and open space purposes: x 2.2 acres of land to be dedicated – 10% of the buildable property x $263,120 (estimated) in-lieu of land dedication – 8% of the pre-developed market value x Combination of land and cash Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan No parks are identified in the City’s Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan, a map of which is attached for reference. The Trail plan identifies the existing trail along Arrowhead Drive and no other trails. Staff recommends requiring a trail easement adjacent to the right-of-way because Hennepin County has recommended that the trail be pushed further from Arrowhead Drive. Acquiring a trail easement along the existing right-of-way would allow for relocation if necessary. Staff recommends a 12’-wide easement along the west of the site (approximately 0.21 acre, or 9.7% of the allowed land dedication). The Diamond Lake Regional Trail master plan preferred route was identified east of the site, nearer the future Tamarack Drive corridor. Staff believes it is appropriate to consider whether easement for the regional trail should be required in any subdivision within the vicinity of the Loram/Scannell Page 5 of 6 August 17, 2022 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review Park Commission Meeting regional trail route. The preferred route does identify the trail east of Tamarack Drive, on property currently owned by the City. However, staff believes providing alternatives for future flexibility is important. This is especially true for the future crossing of Highway 55. Loram/Scannell Page 6 of 6 August 17, 2022 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review Park Commission Meeting If the applicant includes the property to the east as part of the plat to balance hardcover, that property would become part of the subdivision and subject to park dedication. In such case, staff would recommend requiring a trail easement along the eastern boundary of the wetland near Tamarack Drive. A 25’ wide easement would result in an area of approximately 0.28 acre, or 13% of the allowed land dedication. Proposed Parks, Trails and Open Space The applicant does not propose park, trail or open space as part of the subdivision. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the City require dedication of the trail easement along Arrowhead Drive (approximately 0.21 acre, 10% of required dedication). If the eastern property is added to the subdivision, staff would recommend a trail easement along the edge of the wetland as well (0.28 acre, 13% of the required dedication). Staff would recommend that remaining dedication be provided as cash-in-lieu of land dedication. Since 23% of the maximum land is being recommended, the proportional remaining maximum cash amount would be $202,602 (77% of the maximum fee). Attachments 1. Parks and Trail Plan 2. Civil Plans 3. Architectural Plans Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s pe c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a ti o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 2 0 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ S c a n n e l l \ M e d i n a \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 0 - C O V E R S H E E T . d w g J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 2 2 - 3 : 2 0 p m BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E P A R E D F O R CO V E R S H E E T C000 ME D I N A IN D U S T R I A L SC A N N E L L ME D I N A MI N N E S O T A NORTH VICINITY N.T.S. SITE MEDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A ANSI full bleed D (34.00 x 22.00 Inches) SHEET. 3. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. 4. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. NOTES: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE: (651) 645-4197 CONTACT: RYAN HYLLESTED P.L.A. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1826 BUERKLE ROAD ST. PAUL, MN 55110 TELEPHONE: (651) 487-3245 FAX: (651) 487-1812 CONTACT: STEVEN B. MARTIN P.E. PROJECT TEAM: SURVEYOR SUNDE LAND SURVEYING 9001 EAST BLOOMINGTON FREEWAY, STE 118 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420 TELEPHONE: (952) 881-2455 CONTACT: ARLEE CARLSON, P.L.S. ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED BY: BRIAN M. WURDEMAN P.E. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 OWNER / DEVELOPER SCANNELL 294 GROVE LANE, SUITE 140 WAYZATA, MN 55391 TELEPHONE: (763) 331-8851 MEDINA INDUSTRIAL SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 18N, RANGE 23W FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS AR R O W H E A D D R MN-5 5 PRAIRIE DR Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title C000 COVER SHEET C100 GENERAL NOTES C200 OVERALL DEMO PLAN C201 DEMO PLAN C202 DEMO PLAN C203 DEMO PLAN C204 DEMO PLAN C300 OVERALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 C301 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 C302 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 C303 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 C304 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 C305 OVERALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2 C306 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2 C307 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2 C308 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2 C309 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2 C310 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS C400 OVERALL SITE PLAN C401 SITE PLAN C402 SITE PLAN C403 SITE PLAN C404 SITE PLAN C405 SITE DETAILS C500 OVERALL GRADING PLAN C501 GRADING PLAN C502 GRADING PLAN C503 GRADING PLAN C504 GRADING PLAN C505 GRADING DETAILS C600 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C601 UTILITY PLAN C602 UTILITY PLAN C603 UTILITY PLAN C604 UTILITY PLAN C605 UTILITY DETAILS C606 UTILITY DETAILS L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN L101 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 1002 100 2 10 0 2 1002 10 0 3 1003 1003 1003 10 0 41004 10 0 4 10 0 5 100 5 1001 1001 1002 1002 1003 100 3 1003 10 0 4 1004 100 4 10 0 6 1006 10 0 7 1007 1005 1005 10 0 5 1005 10 0 1 1 0 0 1 1002 100 2 1003 1003 10 0 3 1003 1003 100 3 1003 1004 100 4 1004 1004 1004 10 0 4 1000 1000 1005 1005 1005 1001 100 1 1002 1002 100 3 10 0 3 100 3 100 4 10 0 4 1004 1006 1006 100610071008 1000 1005 100 5 997 99 8 999 1001 1001 1002 1002 100 2 100 2 10 0 2 100 2 1003 10 0 3 1003 100 3 10 0 3 1003 1004 100 4 1004 10 0 4 1004 100 4 1006 100 6 1000 1001 1002 1002 1003 1003 99 0 991 992 993 993 993 993 994 994 SEE SHEET C201 SEE SHEET C202 SEE SHEET C203 SEE SHEET C204 EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY TRAIL EASEMENT 10' UTILITY EASEMENT TRAIL EASEMENT 10' UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED 30' WETLAND BUFFER EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED 30' WETLAND BUFFER PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT (TYP) 3,713 SF WETLAND IMPACT 21,722 SF WETLAND IMPACT 2,652 SF WETLAND IMPACT 740 SF WETLAND IMPACT 282 SF WETLAND IMPACT3,577 SF WETLAND IMPACT17,779 SF WETLAND IMPACT 10 0 0 9 9 6 9 9 7 99 8 99 9 10 0 1 1 0 0 2 10 0 3 9 9 0 9 9 5 1 0 0 0 98 9 99 1 99 2 99 3 9 9 4 9 9 6 9 9 7 9 9 8 9 9 9 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 4,805 SF WETLAND IMPACT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (OFFSET FOR CLARITY) Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s pe c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a ti o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 2 0 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ S c a n n e l l \ M e d i n a \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 2 - D E M O P L A N . d w g J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 2 2 - 3 : 2 1 p m BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E P A R E D F O R OV E R A L L D E M O PL A N C200 ME D I N A IN D U S T R I A L SC A N N E L L ME D I N A MI N N E S O T A 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR THE CITY. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES. 5. THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED WORK. 6. ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS ANY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE WORK. 7. ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC. (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MEDINA, <COUNTY> COUNTY AND MINNESOTA/DOT. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTIES IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED. 11. CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE FIRE DEPT. AND THE CITY WATER DEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THIS SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED. 13. REFER TO SURVEY FOR ALL EXISTING INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS. 14. ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTILITIES. 15. IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE OF MINNESOTA REQUIREMENTS. 16. IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE. NO ACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES NORTH LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE WETLAND IMPACT REMOVE TREE REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES PROPERTY LINE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE EXISTING J-BARRIER EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SIGN EXISTING FLARED END SECTION EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM CATCHBASIN EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVE EXISTING WELL EXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER EXISTING ROOF DRAIN EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING METAL COVER EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER EXISTING AIR CONDITIONER EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE EXISTING CABLE BOX EXISTING GUY WIRE EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE CLEARING & GRUBBING FILL & ABANDON UTILITY LINES EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER LEGEND FULL DEPTH SAWCUT OUTLOT A LO T 1 PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G 1 ±1 2 6 , 0 0 0 S F LOT 2 PROPOSED BUILDING 2 ±88,000 SF LOT 3 PROPOSED BUILDING 3 ±182,000 SF 60 . 0 ' 60 . 0 ' 64 . 0 ' 20 . 0 ' 20 . 0 ' 24 . 0 ' EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY TRAIL EASEMENT 10' UTILITY EASEMENT 50' BUILDING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 30' WETLAND BUFFER PROPOSED WETLAND BOUNDARYPROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT 30' WETLAND BUFFER 60 . 0 ' AR R O W H E A D D R I V E (P U B L I C S T R E E T ) RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION 0.89 AC MAINTENANCE ROUTE 20' D&U EASEMENT 50' BUILDING SETBACK 25 . 0 ' 15 . 0 ' 15 . 0 ' LANDSCAPE BUFFER LANDSCAPE BUFFER 24.0' 40 . 0 ' PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT SEE SHEET C401 SEE SHEET C402 SEE SHEET C403 SEE SHEET C404 PROPOSED WETLAND MITIGATION PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT PROPOSED WETLAND MITIGATION BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 25.67 AC BUILDING AREA 1 126,000 SF (11.3% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) BUILDING AREA 2 88,000 SF (7.9% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) BUILDING AREA 3 182,000 SF (16.3% OF TOTAL AREA) PARKING BUILDING 1 REQUIRED PARKING 63 SPACES (1/2000 GSF) BUILDING 1 PROPOSED PARKING 123 SPACES @0.98 RATIO BUILDING 1 ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 5 STALLS / 5 STALLS BUILDING 2 REQUIRED PARKING 44 SPACES (1/2000 GSF) BUILDING 2 PROPOSED PARKING 108 SPACES @1.23 RATIO BUILDING 2 ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 5 STALLS / 5 STALLS BUILDING 3 REQUIRED PARKING 91 SPACES (1/2000 GSF) BUILDING 3 PROPOSED PARKING 143 SPACES @0.79 RATIO BUILDING 3 ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 5 STALLS / 5 STALLS PROPERTY SUMMARY MEDINA INDUSTRIAL TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 25.67 AC RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION 0.89 AC NET PROPERTY AREA 24.78 AC LOT 1 7.50 AC LOT 2 5.07 AC LOT 3 8.79 AC OUTLOT A 3.42 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (WITHIN PROPERTY AREA)18.35 AC PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (WITHIN PROPERTY AREA)7.33 AC TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 22.62 AC WETLAND IMPACTS SEE WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATION ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) PROPOSED ZONING INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT = 50' SIDE = 50' REAR = 50' PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FENCE SETBACK LINE RETAINING WALL PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK LEGEND PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s pe c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a ti o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 2 0 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ S c a n n e l l \ M e d i n a \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 4 - S I T E P L A N . d w g J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 2 2 - 3 : 2 5 p m © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N SITE PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING , DATED 06/17/2021. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 25.67 ACRES. 9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 16. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 20' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 17. THERE ARE WETLAND IMPACTS, REFER TO WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATION FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. NORTH LANDSCAPE LEGEND EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING VEGETATION EDGE TO REMAIN (TYP. EDGER (TYP.) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION, SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.) SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.) A B C D E LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES EDGER (TYP.) DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) ROCK MULCH (TYP.) SOD (TYP.) MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.) OUTLOT A SEE SHEET L101 SEE SHEET L102 SEE SHEET L103 SEE SHEET L104 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BY OTHERS STORM WATER SYSTEM AR R O W H E A D D R I V E (P U B L I C S T R E E T ) EX. INDUSTRIAL / MANUFACTURING LORAM MAINTENANCE OF WAY SEEDING KEYNOTES SEED WITH MNDOT 22-112: FIVE-YEAR STABILIZATION SEED MIX (TYP.) SEED WITH MNDOT 33-261: STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.) SEED WITH MNDOT 34-171: WETLAND REHABILITATION SEED MIX (TYP.) SEED WITH MNDOT 35-221: DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL SEED MIX (TYP.) 22-112 33-261 34-171 35-221 Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s pe c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a ti o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 2 0 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ S c a n n e l l \ M e d i n a \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ L 1 - L A N D S C A P E P L A N . D W G J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 2 2 - 3 : 3 2 p m BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E P A R E D F O R LA N D S C A P E P L A N L100 ME D I N A IN D U S T R I A L SC A N N E L L ME D I N A MI N N E S O T A NORTH LANDSCAPE SUMMARY ZONED: BUSINESS DISTRICT MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED TREES: 82 OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS / CONIFEROUS TREES = 4,096 L.F. SITE PERIMETER/50 41 ORNAMENTAL TREES = 4,096 L.F. SITE PERIMETER/100 PROVIDED TREES: 82 OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS / CONIFEROUS TREES = 39 DECIDUOUS TREES + 43 CONIFEROUS TREES 48 ORNAMENTAL TREES REQUIRED SHRUBS: 137 SHRUBS = 4,096 L.F. SITE PERIMETER/30 PROVIDED SHRUBS: 185 SHRUBS EXISTING TREES REMOVED: 5 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN: 17 TOTAL TREES REQUIRED: 123 = 82 OVERSTORY + 41 ORNAMENTAL TOTAL TREES PROPOSED: 130 = 82 OVERSTORY + 48 ORNAMENTAL LANDSCAPE SUMMARY CONIFEROUS TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL/SIZE BHS 8 PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA BLACK HILLS SPRUCE B & B 6` HT. CED 9 THUJA OCCIDENTALIS WHITE CEDAR B & B 6` HT. ERC 3 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA EASTERN RED CEDAR B & B 6` HT. PON 6 PINUS PONDEROSA PONDEROSA PINE B & B 6` HT. SCO 3 PINUS SYLVESTRIS SCOTCH PINE B & B 6` HT. WHS 17 PICEA GLAUCA WHITE SPRUCE B & B 6` HT. ORNAMENTAL TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL/SIZE ABS 9 AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA 'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE' AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY CLUMP FOR B & B 6` HT. HAW 10 CRATAEGUS CRUS-GALLI INERMIS THORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORN CLUMP FORM B & B 6` HT. QUA+ 41 POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN CLUMP FORM B & B 6` HT. RIV+ 10 BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNK B & B 6` HT. OVERSTORY TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL/SIZE ABM 9 ACER X FREEMANII 'AUTUMN BLAZE' AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE B & B 2.5" CAL. BOU 21 TILIA AMERICANA `BOULEVARD` BOULEVARD AMERICAN LINDEN B & B 2.5" CAL. HAC 11 CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS HACKBERRY B & B 2.5" CAL. HON 3 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS 'SKYCOLE' TM SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST B & B 2.5" CAL. SWO 5 QUERCUS BICOLOR SWAMP WHITE OAK B & B 2.5" CAL. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING AJN 17 PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `JEFAM` AMBER JUBILEE NINEBARK #5 CONT. 4` O.C. ANH 15 HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS `ANNABELLE` ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA #5 CONT. 4` O.C. BLC 53 ARONIA MELANOCARPA `IROQUOIS BEAUTY` TM IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY #5 CONT. 4` O.C. DBH 137 DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT. 3` O.C. GLS 51 RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW` GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC #5 CONT. 4` O.C. PJM 44 RHODODENDRON X `P.J.M.` PJM RHODODENDRON #5 CONT. 4` O.C. PERENNIALS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING AST 420 ASTILBE X ARENDSII `RHEINLAND` RHIENLAND ASTILBE #1 CONT. 24" O.C. HKG 95 HAKONECHLOA MACRA `AUREOLA` GOLDEN VARIEGATED HAKONECHLOA #1 CONT 24" O.C. KFG 82 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT 30" O.C. PDS 66 SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT 24" O.C. PWW 69 ECHINACEA X `POW WOW WILDBERRY` POW WOW WILDBERRY CONEFLOWER #1 CONT 24" O.C. WLC 112 NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW` WALKERS LOW CATMINT #1 CONT 30" O.C. PLANT SCHEDULE Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s pe c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a ti o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 2 0 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ S c a n n e l l \ M e d i n a \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ L 1 - L A N D S C A P E D E T A I L S . d w g J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 2 2 - 3 : 3 2 p m BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E P A R E D F O R LA N D S C A P E DE T A I L S L101 ME D I N A IN D U S T R I A L SC A N N E L L ME D I N A MI N N E S O T A EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY EX.TRAIL EASEMENT 50' BUILDING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK PROPERTY LINE EX. PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE AR R O W H E A D D R I V E (P U B L I C S T R E E T ) EX. 10' UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED ROW DEDICATION PROPOSED 20' WATERMAIN EASEMENT PROPOSED 20' WATERMAIN EASEMENT LOT 1, BLOCK 1 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 LOT 3, BLOCK 1 OUTLOT A PR E P A R E D F O R PR E L I M I N A R Y PL A T EX-1 ME D I N A IN D U S T R I A L SC A N N E L L ME D I N A MI N N E S O T A Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s pe c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a ti o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . 2 0 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E NORTH CATCH BASIN ELECTRIC BOX GATE VALVE HYDRANT UTILITY POLE GAS METER SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE LIMITED ACCESS UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD WIRE SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN CULVERT UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATION PROPERTY LINE LEGEND SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE GAS MAIN STORM SEWER GAS EXISTING PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE GATE VALVE HYDRANT TEE REDUCER SANITARY CLEANOUTCO PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 OWNER LORAM MAINTENANCE OF WAY INC P.O. BOX 181 HAMEL, MN 55340 APPLICANT SCANNELL PROPERTIES 294 GROVE LANE, SUITE 140 WAYZATA, MN 55391 CIVIL ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC. BRIAN WURDEMAN, P.E. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 SURVEYOR SUNDE LAND SURVEYING ARLEE CARLSON, P.L.S. 9001 EAST BLOOMINGTON FREEWAY, STE 118 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420 EXISTING SUBJECT SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23 DESCRIBED AS BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH 12 OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 1485 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE THEREOF 528 FEET; THENCE WEST PARALLEL TO THE SAID NORTH LINE 1485 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE THEREOF; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE 528 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE SOUTH 250 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PROPOSED SUBJECT SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MEDINA INDUSTRIAL FIRST ADDITION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LOT 2, BLOCK 1, MEDINA INDUSTRIAL FIRST ADDITION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LOT 3, BLOCK 1, MEDINA INDUSTRIAL FIRST ADDITION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA OUTLOT A, MEDINA INDUSTRIAL FIRST ADDITION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PROPERTY SUMMARY MEDINA INDUSTRIAL TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 25.67 AC RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION 0.89 AC NET PROPERTY AREA 24.78 AC LOT 1 7.50 AC LOT 2 5.07 AC LOT 3 8.79 AC OUTLOT A 3.42 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (WITHIN PROPERTY AREA)18.35 AC PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (WITHIN PROPERTY AREA)7.33 AC TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 22.62 AC WETLAND IMPACTS SEE WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATION ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) PROPOSED ZONING INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT = 50' SIDE = 50' REAR = 50' ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϯϯΖͲ ϰΗ ϭϮϯϰϱ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϯϱΖͲ ϬΗ ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϯϯΖͲ ϰΗ &',:<>D E d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϯϱΖͲ ϬΗ WͲϭ Z<Ͳϭ '>Ͳϭ ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϯϯΖͲ ϰΗ ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϯϱΖͲ ϬΗ ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϯϯΖͲ ϰΗ &',:<>DE K<> s > ϵϲΖͲ ϬΗ WͲϭ ^d >&KZD&/E/^,WZ ^dt>>WE >^t/d,Z s >^Ͳ W/Ed Z ͗ϰϴ͕ϴϳϬ^&Ͳ ϴϱй yd Z/KZDd Z/>^> ' E Z<Ͳϭ WZ ^dt>>WE >t/d,/D d,/EZ/<s E Z Z ͗Ϯ͕ϲϬϬ^&Ͳ ϱй '>Ͳϭ >hD/EhD^dKZ &ZKEd'>/E' Z ͗ϱ͕ϰϱϬ^&Ͳ ϭϬй '$7( '5$:1%< &+(&.('%< 352-(&7180%(5 7ZHOYH2DNV&HQWHU 'U 6XLWH :D\]DWD01 7HO )D[ '5 $ : , 1 * , 1 ) 2 5 0 $ 7 , 2 1 3+ $ 6 ( ,6 6 8 ( 5 ( & 2 5 ' 5( * , 6 7 5 $ 7 , 2 1 $ 5 & + , 7 ( & 7 35 2 - ( & 7 1 $ 0 ( &20387(5',5(&725< 6+ ( ( 7 ' ( 6 & 5 , 3 7 , 2 1 d, Z,/d d^,>> D d, hd,KZ^E KtE Z^K&d, /ZZ ^W d/s /E^dZhD Ed^K&^ Zs/ E^,>>Z d/E>>KDDKE>t͕ ^ddhdKZzEKd, ZZ ^ Zs Z/',d^͕/E>h/E' KWzZ/',d^K&d, dd, KhD Ed^͘127)25&216758&7,21& ? 5 H Y L W 3 U R M H F W V ? B 0 H G L Q D B 0 D V W H U B D D X W U H \ ) : ' + - U Y W ϯϬϬ yd Z/KZ h/>/E' > sd/KE^ 63$(7=(/ $$875(< -2%6?6&$11(//?1257+3$5.9,B KE^dZhd/KE KhD Ed^ WZKWK^ h/>/E'ϭ E tKE^dZhd/KE ZZKt, Z/s D /E͕DEϰϰϮϱϲ ϯͬϲϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ Ϯ > sd/KEͲ EKZd, ϯͬϲϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ ϭ > sd/KEͲ t ^d ϯͬϲϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ ϯ > sd/KEͲ ^Khd, ϯͬϲϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ ϰ > sd/KEͲ ^d ϯϬϬ ϱ ϯs/ t 12 '(6&5,37,21 '$7( '$7( '5$:1%< &+(&.('%< 352-(&7180%(5 7ZHOYH2DNV&HQWHU 'U 6XLWH :D\]DWD01 7HO )D[ '5 $ : , 1 * , 1 ) 2 5 0 $ 7 , 2 1 3+ $ 6 ( ,6 6 8 ( 5 ( & 2 5 ' 5( * , 6 7 5 $ 7 , 2 1 $ 5 & + , 7 ( & 7 35 2 - ( & 7 1 $ 0 ( &20387(5',5(&725< 6+ ( ( 7 ' ( 6 & 5 , 3 7 , 2 1 d, Z,/d d^,>> D d, hd,KZ^E KtE Z^K&d, /ZZ ^W d/s /E^dZhD Ed^K&^ Zs/ E^,>>Z d/E>>KDDKE>t͕ ^ddhdKZzEKd, ZZ ^ Zs Z/',d^͕/E>h/E' KWzZ/',d^K&d, dd, KhD Ed^͘127)25&216758&7,21& ? 5 H Y L W 3 U R M H F W V ? B 0 H G L Q D B 0 D V W H U B D D X W U H \ ) : ' + - U Y W WϬϬϭͲϭ yd Z/KZKE Wd Ͳϯ/D' 63$(7=(/ 71,&+2/,( -2%6?6&$11(//?1257+3$5.9,B KE^dZhd/KE KhD Ed^ WZKWK^ h/>/E'ϭ E tKE^dZhd/KE ZZKt, Z/s D /E͕DEϰϰϮϱϲ 12 '(6&5,37,21 '$7( ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ d͘K͘t>>Ͳ ϭϯϱΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘t>>Ͳ ϭϯϴΖͲ ϭϬΗ ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ &',:<>D d͘K͘t>>Ͳ ϭϯϱΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘t>>Ͳ ϭϯϴΖͲ ϭϬΗ ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ ϭϮϯϰ d͘K͘t>>Ͳ ϭϯϱΖͲ ϬΗ ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ &',:<>D K<> s > ϵϲΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘t>>Ͳ ϭϯϱΖͲ ϬΗ <͘K͘<͘K͘<͘K͘<͘K͘<͘K͘<͘K͘<͘K͘<͘K͘ <͘K͘ <͘K͘<͘K͘<͘K͘ <͘K͘ yd Z/KZDd Z/>^> ' E WͲϭ ^d >&KZD&/E/^,WZ ^dt>>WE >^t/d,Z s >^Ͳ W/Ed Z ͗ϰϰ͕ϭϱϬ^&Ͳ ϴϳй '>Ͳϭ >hD/EhD^dKZ &ZKEd'>/E' Z ͗ϲ͕ϭϮϬ^&Ͳ ϭϯй ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘t>>Ͳ ϭϯϱΖͲ ϬΗ KW E/E' KW E/E' ϳΖ Ͳ ϲ Η ϲΗ ϴΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϮΖ Ͳ ϲ Η ϲΗ ϯΖ Ͳ ϲ Η ϲΗ ϮΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϴΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϮΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϭΗ WZ s >͕ dzW͘ WdͲϮ WdͲϯ ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘t>>Ͳ ϭϯϱΖͲ ϬΗ ϮΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϲΗ ϳΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϲΗ ϮΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϲΗ ϯΖ Ͳ ϲ Η ϲΗ ϮΖ Ͳ ϲ Η ϲΗ ϳΖ Ͳ ϲ Η ϲΗ ϳΖ Ͳ ϲ Η ϭΗ WZ s >͕ dzW͘ WdͲϭ WdͲϯ ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘t>>Ͳ ϭϯϱΖͲ ϬΗ ϮΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϲΗ ϳΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϲΗ ϮΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϲΗ ϯΖ Ͳ ϲ Η ϲΗ ϮΖ Ͳ ϲ Η ϲΗ ϳΖ Ͳ ϲ Η ϲΗ ϳΖ Ͳ ϲ Η Ϯ Ζ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϭΗ WZ s >͕ dzW͘ WdͲϯ ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ K<> s > ϵϲΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘t>>Ͳ ϭϯϱΖͲ ϬΗ KW E/E' KW E/E' ϳΖ Ͳ ϲ Η ϲΗ ϳΖ Ͳ ϲ Η ϲΗ ϮΖ Ͳ ϲ Η ϲΗ ϰΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϮΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϲΗ ϳΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϲΗ ϮΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϰΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϭΗ WZ s >͕ dzW͘ WdͲϭ WdͲϯ ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘t>>Ͳ ϭϯϱΖͲ ϬΗ ϮΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϳΖ Ͳ ϲ Η ϲΗ ϭϭ Ζ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϰΖ Ͳ Ϭ Η ϭϮ Ζ Ͳ Ϭ Η KW E/E' KW E/E' ϭΗ WZ s >͕ dzW͘ DͲϭ WdͲϯ '$7( '5$:1%< &+(&.('%< 352-(&7180%(5 7ZHOYH2DNV&HQWHU 'U 6XLWH :D\]DWD01 7HO )D[ '5 $ : , 1 * , 1 ) 2 5 0 $ 7 , 2 1 3+ $ 6 ( ,6 6 8 ( 5 ( & 2 5 ' 5( * , 6 7 5 $ 7 , 2 1 $ 5 & + , 7 ( & 7 35 2 - ( & 7 1 $ 0 ( &20387(5',5(&725< 6+ ( ( 7 ' ( 6 & 5 , 3 7 , 2 1 d, Z,/d d^,>> D d, hd,KZ^E KtE Z^K&d, /ZZ ^W d/s /E^dZhD Ed^K&^ Zs/ E^,>>Z d/E>>KDDKE>t͕ ^ddhdKZzEKd, ZZ ^ Zs Z/',d^͕/E>h/E' KWzZ/',d^K&d, dd, KhD Ed^͘127)25&216758&7,21& ? 5 H Y L W 3 U R M H F W V ? B 0 H G L Q D , Q G X V W U L D O 3 D U N B D O W H U Q D W H B D D X W UH \ ) : ' + - U Y W ϯϬϬ yd Z/KZ h/>/E' > sd/KE^ 63$(7=(/702+$*(1 $$875(< -2%6?6&$11(//?0(',1$B KE^dZhd/KE KhD Ed^ WZKWK^ h/>/E'Ϯ E tKE^dZhd/KE D /E͕DEϰϰϮϱϲ ϭͬϭϲΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ ϭ > sd/KEͲ t ^d ϭͬϭϲΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ ϯ > sd/KEͲ EKZd, ϭͬϭϲΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ Ϯ > sd/KEͲ ^d ϭͬϭϲΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ ϰ > sd/KEͲ ^Khd, ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ ϲ WE > ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ ϳ WE > ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ ϴ WE > ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ ϵ WE > ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ ϭϬ WE > W Z^W d/s s/ t 12 '(6&5,37,21 '$7( '$7( '5$:1%< &+(&.('%< 352-(&7180%(5 7ZHOYH2DNV&HQWHU 'U 6XLWH :D\]DWD01 7HO )D[ '5 $ : , 1 * , 1 ) 2 5 0 $ 7 , 2 1 3+ $ 6 ( ,6 6 8 ( 5 ( & 2 5 ' 5( * , 6 7 5 $ 7 , 2 1 $ 5 & + , 7 ( & 7 35 2 - ( & 7 1 $ 0 ( &20387(5',5(&725< 6+ ( ( 7 ' ( 6 & 5 , 3 7 , 2 1 d, Z,/d d^,>> D d, hd,KZ^E KtE Z^K&d, /ZZ ^W d/s /E^dZhD Ed^K&^ Zs/ E^,>>Z d/E>>KDDKE>t͕ ^ddhdKZzEKd, ZZ ^ Zs Z/',d^͕/E>h/E' KWzZ/',d^K&d, dd, KhD Ed^͘127)25&216758&7,21& ? 5 H Y L W 3 U R M H F W V ? B 0 H G L Q D , Q G X V W U L D O 3 D U N B D O W H U Q D W H B D D X W UH \ ) : ' + - U Y W WϭϬϬ yd Z/KZ &KHFNHU $XWKRU -2%6?6&$11(//?0(',1$B KE^dZhd/KE KhD Ed^ WZKWK^ h/>/E'Ϯ E tKE^dZhd/KE D /E͕DEϰϰϮϱϲ 12 '(6&5,37,21 '$7( ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϯϳΖͲ ϰΗ &',:<>D E W Y Z ^d > Z, /',d ϭϯϮΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϯϵΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϰϭΖͲ ϬΗ h ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ ͘K͘ < ϭϯϱΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϯϳΖͲ ϰΗ &',:<>DEWYZ^d > Z, /',d ϭϯϮΖͲ ϬΗ K<> s > ϵϲΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϯϵΖͲ ϬΗ , Ͳ ϭϬϴΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϰϭΖͲ ϬΗ h ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ ͘K͘ < ϭϯϱΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϯϳΖͲ ϰΗ ϲ ϱ ϰ ϯ Ϯ ϭ > Z, /',d ϭϯϮΖͲ ϬΗ K<> s > ϵϲΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϯϵΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϰϭΖͲ ϬΗ ϭ^d> s > ϭϬϬΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϯϳΖͲ ϰΗ ϲϱϰϯϮϭ > Z, /',d ϭϯϮΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϯϵΖͲ ϬΗ d͘K͘^dZhdhZ Ͳ ϭϰϭΖͲ ϬΗ yd Z/KZDd Z/>^> ' E WͲϭ ^d >&KZD&/E/^,WZ ^dt>>WE >^t/d,Z s >^Ͳ W/Ed Z ͗ϳϯ͕ϱϭϮ^&Ͳ ϵϬй '>Ͳϭ >hD/EhD^dKZ &ZKEd'>/E' Z ͗ϳ͕ϵϭϯ^&Ͳ ϭϬй '$7( '5$:1%< &+(&.('%< 352-(&7180%(5 7ZHOYH2DNV&HQWHU 'U 6XLWH :D\]DWD01 7HO )D[ '5 $ : , 1 * , 1 ) 2 5 0 $ 7 , 2 1 3+ $ 6 ( ,6 6 8 ( 5 ( & 2 5 ' 5( * , 6 7 5 $ 7 , 2 1 $ 5 & + , 7 ( & 7 35 2 - ( & 7 1 $ 0 ( &20387(5',5(&725< 6+ ( ( 7 ' ( 6 & 5 , 3 7 , 2 1 d, Z,/d d^,>> D d, hd,KZ^E KtE Z^K&d, /ZZ ^W d/s /E^dZhD Ed^K&^ Zs/ E^,>>Z d/E>>KDDKE>t͕ ^ddhdKZzEKd, ZZ ^ Zs Z/',d^͕/E>h/E' KWzZ/',d^K&d, dd, KhD Ed^͘127)25&216758&7,21ϭϴϬϳϰ dKDK,' E͕/͕EZ /, Z z Zd/&zd,dd,/^W>E͕ ^W /&/d/KEKZZ WKZdt^WZ WZ z D KZhE ZDz/Z d^hW Zs/^/KE͕E d,d/Dh>z>/ E^ Z,/d d hE Zd, >t^K&d, ^dd K&D/EE ^Kd͘ Z '/^dZd/KEEhD Z͗ & ? 5 H Y L W 3 U R M H F W V ? B 0 H G L Q D B , Q G X V W U L D O B 3 D U N B D D X W U H \ ) : ' + - U Y W ϯϬϬ yd Z/KZ h/>/E' > sd/KE^ 63$(7=(/ 71,&+2/,( -REV?6FDQQHOO?0HGLQDB KE^dZhd/KE KhD Ed^ WZKWK^ h/>/E'ϯ E tKE^dZhd/KE D /E͕DEϰϰϮϱϲ ϭͬϯϮΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ ϯ > sd/KEͲ ^Khd, ϭͬϯϮΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ ϭ > sd/KEͲ EKZd, ϭͬϯϮΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ Ϯ > sd/KEͲ t ^d ϭͬϯϮΗсϭΖͲϬΗϯϬϬ ϰ > sd/KEͲ ^d 12 '(6&5,37,21 '$7( '$7( '5$:1%< &+(&.('%< 352-(&7180%(5 7ZHOYH2DNV&HQWHU 'U 6XLWH :D\]DWD01 7HO )D[ '5 $ : , 1 * , 1 ) 2 5 0 $ 7 , 2 1 3+ $ 6 ( ,6 6 8 ( 5 ( & 2 5 ' 5( * , 6 7 5 $ 7 , 2 1 $ 5 & + , 7 ( & 7 35 2 - ( & 7 1 $ 0 ( &20387(5',5(&725< 6+ ( ( 7 ' ( 6 & 5 , 3 7 , 2 1 d, Z,/d d^,>> D d, hd,KZ^E KtE Z^K&d, /ZZ ^W d/s /E^dZhD Ed^K&^ Zs/ E^,>>Z d/E>>KDDKE>t͕ ^ddhdKZzEKd, ZZ ^ Zs Z/',d^͕/E>h/E' KWzZ/',d^K&d, dd, KhD Ed^͘127)25&216758&7,21ϭϴϬϳϰ dKDK,' E͕/͕EZ /, Z z Zd/&zd,dd,/^W>E͕ ^W /&/d/KEKZZ WKZdt^WZ WZ z D KZhE ZDz/Z d^hW Zs/^/KE͕E d,d/Dh>z>/ E^ Z,/d d hE Zd, >t^K&d, ^dd K&D/EE ^Kd͘ Z '/^dZd/KEEhD Z͗ & ? 5 H Y L W 3 U R M H F W V ? B 0 H G L Q D B , Q G X V W U L D O B 3 D U N B D D X W U H \ ) : ' + - U Y W WϬϬϭͲϭ yd Z/KZKE Wd Ͳϯ/D' &KHFNHU $XWKRU -REV?6FDQQHOO?0HGLQDB KE^dZhd/KE KhD Ed^ WZKWK^ h/>/E'ϯ E tKE^dZhd/KE D /E͕DEϰϰϮϱϲ 12 '(6&5,37,21 '$7( 1 TO: Members of the Park Commission FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: August 11, 2022 MEETING: August 17, 2022 SUBJECT: Grandstand Proposal – Paul Fortin Field – Hamel Legion Park The Hamel Athletic Club and the Hamel Hawks will be present at the meeting to discuss their request to build a grandstand at the Paul Fortin Memorial Field in Hamel Legion Park. In July 2021 HAC presented their grandstand concept to the Park Commission. At the time, they indicated they did not intend to request City funds but wanted general support from the City for the project so they could begin fundraising and soliciting corporate donors for the project. This project was added to the capital plan with final approval set for the year 2023. The estimated cost for installation of the grandstand is $570,141. HAC and the Hawks would like to proceed with installation of the grandstand in 2023. They now request that the City partner on installation as follows: x Up to $114,767.00 (20% of the total cost) x Any permit fees to be waived x The City to provide support with site preparation(s) and restoration(s) HAC and the Hawks indicate that the proposed ballpark improvements would: x Result in more use of the field x Offer amenities for fans x Provide the ability to host larger events that can bring in revenue and exposure to the community The grandstand would become a City asset after installation since it is located within the park. Staff recommends that the Park Commission consider two primary questions: 1) Confirm whether the grandstand is a desired improvement to be added to Hamel Legion Park. 2) Discuss what level of financial contribution, if any, the City should contribute to the project. On the first question, staff has not identified significant concerns adding the amenity to Hamel Legion Park. It adds value to the baseball activities which may be possible in Hamel Legion Park, which is a significant part of the park. HAC and the Hawks, often in partnership with the Hamel Lions and other community groups, have contributed significantly to improvements in Hamel Legion Park, which brings much to the community. MEMORANDUM $JHQGD,WHP 2 As the Park Commission and City Council consider a financial contribution to the project, it is important to note that this request has not been accounted for in the City’s future budget plan. The City has generally relied on Park Dedication funds for establishment of new parks and trails and improvements within parks which are anticipated to have broad general usage by residents. The Park Dedication fee structure and capital plan does not anticipate significant funds for specialized recreational improvements. Staff projects that the Park Dedication Fund may not be sufficient to support the future park and trail improvements already identified. The fund has been reduced considerably after the recent parkland acquisition on Chippewa Road, and development of that park will rely on the fund in coming years. The City has also established the Park Replacement Fund, which was similarly planned to support the replacement of existing assets, rather than installation of new improvements. The Hunter Park reconstruction has utilized a significant portion of the Replacement Fund. As a result, contribution to this project may require general tax revenues (or if funding through Park Dedication, may lead to future tax revenue needs for other improvements). The Public Works department is not in a position to take on additional projects as we have already committed to extra projects (Hunter Park and Lake Shore Park renovations) to be completed over the next couple of years. Staff recommends that the Park Commission and City Council weigh the $114,000 contribution toward the grandstand with other potential improvement to the broader City park and trail system. Attachments: HAC / Hamel Hawks Memo with Attachments To Members of The Medina Park Commission, We are excited to share our plans for improvements to be made to Paul Fortin Memorial Field in Hamel and our specific requests to the City of Medina to help make this project a reality for our community. Paul Fortin Memorial Field is utilized by the Hamel Athletics Club for Youth Programming and for the Hamel Hawks Town Ball Team. The improvements we are seeking final approvals and funding for include a new grandstand and netting to replace the chain link fence at Hamel’s Paul Fortin Memorial Field. This will be a huge community asset and be a focal point for gathering during the summer. Many members of our community have been wanting a grandstand at Fortin for a couple of decades now and are excited that it is finally happening. The Fox9 Town Ball Tour event went well this summer, and they expressed a willingness to come back next year (they said it was the best townball game they've ever covered). The ballpark improvements we are proposing will result in more use of the field, amenities for fans, and ability to host larger events that can bring in revenue and exposure to the Community of Hamel and City of Medina. Attached, you will find the proposals and designs for the grandstand and for the netting to replace the chain link fence. These have been developed in agreement between the Hamel Athletic Club and Hamel Lions. An overlay is included, because we will be moving the backstop 6 feet closer, the overall footprint is very close to the existing cement pad footprint. We are in favor of an Engineered Floating Cement Pad underneath the structure grandstand.This is something we can discuss with Dusty at the City of Medina after he reviews the design. Grandstand Cost $570,141 Netting Cost $3,694 Total Project Cost $573,835 Quotes have been obtained for the project costs after research on reputable vendors. Hamel Athletic Club voted on Tuesday, July 26 to move forward with this project and has plans to pay for it through donations received, cash in current accounts, and financing from the bank. The goal is for the project to be completed by the start of the 2023 baseball season. We are asking for approval and recommendation from the Hamel Parks Commission to move forward with the project. Following an approval, we will be respectfully requesting for the City of Medina to contribute up to 20% of the total costs of the project (maximum of $114,767).”HAC is committed to moving forward with the project, even if the City participation is less than 20%, so we are asking for approval of the project even if the funding is not available. We also are asking the City to waive any permit fees, and to provide support with site prep (removing existing concrete) and site restoration (re-sodding, etc.). We look forward to finding time to discuss this proposal further with the appropriate committees. Thank you! Greg & Ryan Greg DeVos, Hamel Hawks General Manager & Hamel Lions President 763-228-3136 gregd.hamelhawks@gmail.com Ryan Wilson, Hamel Athletic Club (Hamel Baseball) 612-802-6541 wils0431@gmail.com Attachments: ●Quote - Sportsfield Specialities: Quote for hardware needed to attach netting ●Quote - Saafe, LLC: Quote for Baseball Grandstand and press box ●Drawing/Design - Grandstand ●Layout Proof - Grandstand ●Drawing to Scale - Grandstand ●Examples - Comparable Grandstands ABOUT Hamel Athletic Club (Hamel Baseball):Hamel Athletic Club was granted 501(c)3 status in 2010 by the IRS and is a tax-exempt organization. The program is funded by player registration fees as well as the generous support of local businesses who provide capital sponsorship as well as team sponsorship funding. Hamel Baseball is run by a Board of Directors, all of which are volunteers. Hamel Hawks:The Hamel Hawks are the Hamel Amateur Baseball Team. The team was founded in 1926. Class B State Champions in 1987 and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uly 21, 2022 To: Hamel Athletic Club Attn: Ryan Wilson Cell: (612) 802-6541 Email: wils0431@gmail.com Reference: Baseball Grandstands Description and Price Grandstand and press box 4’-0” elevated mitered, with roof, including press box and foundations. 8 Row option as per drawings 20SD156 R2 & press box drawing 8 Row, Total Seats: 360, Chairs: 90 Total Materials Delivered & Installed: $570,141.00 Exclusions: The cost of a building permit, P&P Bonds Approved By: __________________________________________ Date: ______________ Pricing valid for 10 days Payment Terms: Net 15 Delivery: Scheduled By: Tim Tobin DESIGN LOADING TREAD & SEAT AREA 100psf UNIFORM LIVE LOAD. SEAT (VERTICAL) 120 lbs/lf. SEAT (HORIZONTAL SWAY) 24lbs/lf PARALLEL AND 10lbs/lf PERPENDICULAR TO SEAT. TREAD - STAIR AND AISLE TREADS - MINIMUM CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 300LBS ON AN AREA OF 4 SQUARE INCHES HANDRAIL & GUARDRAIL 50 lbs/lf IN ANY DIRECTION AT THE TOP. HANDRAIL & GUARDRAIL 200 lbs CONCENTRATED IN ANY DIRECTION. GUARDS, INFILL COMPONENTS - 50LBS PER SQ.FT. IN HORIZONTAL DIRECTION SNOW LOADS AS PER STATE ADOPTED CODE WIND LOADS AS PER STATE ADOPTED CODE SEISMIC LOADS AS PER STATE ADOPTED CODE NOTES ALL STRUCTURAL AND MISCELLANEOUS STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING A.I.S.C. STANDARDS PLATE UP TO 1/2" THICK = A36 Gr. 36 Fy = 36 ksi Min. PLATE 5/8 and greater = 572 Gr 50, Fy = 50 ksi Min. ANGLE = A36/A36M GRADE 50 WIDE FLANGE = A992 Fy=50 ksi CHANNEL = A36/A36M GRADE 50 ROD = A36/A529 GRADE 50 TUBE = A500 GRADE "B" 46 ksi WELDS ARE ALL AROUND WITH TYPE ER70S-6 WIRE MIG. ALL STEEL TO BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED TO A.S.T.M. A-123-89 ae1. STRUCTURAL BOLTS ARE HOT DIPPED GALV. AND ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN A-307. NO CONNECTIONS UTILIZING HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS ARE CLASSED AS SLIP CRITICAL. ANODIZED ALUMINUM RAIL IS 1 1/4" NOMINAL PIPE SIZE. (1 5/8" O.D.) SOUTHERN BLEACHER COMPANY AS A MANUFACTURER AND INSTALLER OF GRANDSTAND SEATING IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO CERTIFY PLANS AS ADA COMPLIANT. HOWEVER, TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE THESE PLANS MEET OR EXCEED ADA REQUIREMENTS FOR QUANTITY OF ADA SEATING, ACCESS/EGRESS TO ADA SEATING, & DISPERSAL OF ADA SEATING. ALL FIELD CONNECTIONS ARE NON-SLIP CRITICAL U.N.O. ALL CONNECTIONS ARE DESIGNED TO UTILIZE A307 BOLTS, IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO USE A325N BOLTS IN LIEU OF THE A307 BOLTS. THE INSTALLATION OF THESE BOLTS ARE TO BE TIGHTENED A SNUG TIGHT CONDITION AS SPECIFIED BY AISC. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NOT TO SCALE PLANK ARRANGEMENT 16" RISE X 32" TREAD AISLE AREASEATING F F F F G G CD E E CD E CD E CD A 2'- 8 " A 5'-4" KL HJG KL HJG A = 22" INTERKAL AURA CHAIRS C = 2 X 10 MILL ALUMINUM INTERLOCK 2000 TREAD - NOSE E = 2 X 10 MILL ALUMINUM INTERLOCK 2000 TREAD - HEEL F = 1 X 12 1/2 PAINTED ALUMINUM FLAT RISER (COLOR: CHOSEN BY OWNER) G = 1 X 1 PAINTED ALUMINUM CONTRASTING NOSING (BLACK) D = 2 X 12 MILL ALUMINUM INTERLOCK TREAD - DECK H = 2 X 9 MILL ALUM. INTERLOCK HALFSTEP - DECK J = 2 X 7 MILL ALUM. INTERLOCK HALFSTEP - NOSE W/RISER K = 6 1/2" MILL ALUMINUM HALFSTEP BRACKET L = 6 1/2" ANODIZED ALUMINUM INTERLOCK STEP RISER RI S E 42 " A B O V E A I S L E N O S E ANOD. ALUM. RAIL (TYP) GALVANIZED L3X3X1/4 RAIL RISER (TYP) RIS E 36" A B O V E A I S L E N O S E NOT TO SCALE SIDE RAILING @ END AISLE OFFSET HANDRAIL (TYP) 6 GAUGE BLACK VINYL COATED CHAINLINK FENCE 8'-0" PRESSBOX BASE PRESSBOX BY OTHERS 4'-0 3/16" (1)-4NR (3)-2X9D (2)-2X8D 3' - 3 " 6 R I S E S @ 6. 5 " = 3 9 " (2)-1X6 1/2, PAINTED FLAT RISERBOARD @ PRESSBOX (COLOR: CHOSEN BY OWNER) 4' - 0 " 3' - 6 " 1 2 3 4 5 8 6'-2" (4) 2X8D, (3) 2X10D & (1) 2X10H2K 1' - 4 " 2'-8" 5'-8 1/2" A A 4'-7 1/16"4'-7 1/16"4'-7 1/16"4'-7 1/16"4'-7 1/16" 1'-0" 4" 1" CLEAR SCALE:1/2"=1'-0" SECTION VIEW AT PRESSBOX DBL. L2X2X3/16" STRUT W/C7X9.8 TYP. @"A" ROW 7 1 1 / 1 6 " CL E A R 6 7 1'-0"4'-7 1/16" 4'-7 1/16"90 DEG ANGLE 3/16" GALV PLATE 1 1/2" 15'-0"9'-4 1/2" A 24'-4 1/2" REV REV REV REV REV A TO B ROW NOW 15'-0" ADD C ROW, NO KICKER 5'-10 3/8" NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N TH I S D R A W I N G A N D A L L I N F O R M A T I O N T H E R E I N I S T H E PR O P E R T Y O F T H E S O U T H E R N B L E A C H E R C O M P A N Y , CO P I E D . T H I S D R A W I N G I S L O A N E D S U B J E C T T O R E - AN D I S C O N F I D E N T I A L A N D M U S T N O T B E M A D E P U B L I C O R TU R N U P O N D E M A N D A N D , I S N O T T O B E U S E D DI R E C T L Y O R I N D I R E C T L Y I N A N Y W A Y D E T R I M E N T A L TO O U R I N T E R E S T S . DRAWN SHEET JOB NUMBER BY DATE RE V DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E OF CHECKED TY P E TIT L E Fa x : 9 4 0 / 5 4 9 - 1 3 6 5 80 1 F i f t h S t r e e t . PO B o x O n e , G r a h a m , T e x a s 7 6 4 5 0 Es t a b l i s h e d 1 9 4 6 Ph o n e : 9 4 0 / 5 4 9 - 0 7 3 3 GR A N D S T A N D S B L E A C H E R S S T A D I U M S BL E A C H E R C O M P A N Y R 1 DE T A I L N U M B E R SH E E T N U M B E R 22 " X 3 4 " ( 1 1 x 1 7 = 1 / 2 i n d i c a t e d s c a l e ) A B C D A B C D 123456 123456 1 1 SE C T I O N V I E W - B I G G E R S T A N D #20SD156 20SD156 5 9/21/20 AJL LD 16 " & 1 2 " R I S E X 3 2 " & 2 6 " T R E A D / M I T E R E D & 3 6 ' - 0 " ( 6 & 5 R O W S ) HA M E L B A S E B A L L ME D I N A , M I N N E S O T A 1 JJ 8/2 6 / 2 1 CO L U M N S / R O W S 8'-0" INTERLOCK 2K DECKING DESIGN LOADING TREAD & SEAT AREA 100psf UNIFORM LIVE LOAD. SEAT (VERTICAL) 120 lbs/lf. SEAT (HORIZONTAL SWAY) 24lbs/lf PARALLEL AND 10lbs/lf PERPENDICULAR TO SEAT. TREAD - STAIR AND AISLE TREADS - MINIMUM CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 300LBS ON AN AREA OF 4 SQUARE INCHES HANDRAIL & GUARDRAIL 50 lbs/lf IN ANY DIRECTION AT THE TOP. HANDRAIL & GUARDRAIL 200 lbs CONCENTRATED IN ANY DIRECTION. GUARDS, INFILL COMPONENTS - 50LBS PER SQ.FT. IN HORIZONTAL DIRECTION SNOW LOADS AS PER STATE ADOPTED CODE WIND LOADS AS PER STATE ADOPTED CODE SEISMIC LOADS AS PER STATE ADOPTED CODE NOTES ALL STRUCTURAL AND MISCELLANEOUS STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING A.I.S.C. STANDARDS PLATE UP TO 1/2" THICK = A36 Gr. 36 Fy = 36 ksi Min. PLATE 5/8 and greater = 572 Gr 50, Fy = 50 ksi Min. ANGLE = A36/A36M GRADE 50 WIDE FLANGE = A992 Fy=50 ksi CHANNEL = A36/A36M GRADE 50 ROD = A36/A529 GRADE 50 TUBE = A500 GRADE "B" 46 ksi WELDS ARE ALL AROUND WITH TYPE ER70S-6 WIRE MIG. ALL STEEL TO BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED TO A.S.T.M. A-123-89 ae1. STRUCTURAL BOLTS ARE HOT DIPPED GALV. AND ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN A-307. NO CONNECTIONS UTILIZING HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS ARE CLASSED AS SLIP CRITICAL. ANODIZED ALUMINUM RAIL IS 1 1/4" NOMINAL PIPE SIZE. (1 5/8" O.D.) SOUTHERN BLEACHER COMPANY AS A MANUFACTURER AND INSTALLER OF GRANDSTAND SEATING IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO CERTIFY PLANS AS ADA COMPLIANT. HOWEVER, TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE THESE PLANS MEET OR EXCEED ADA REQUIREMENTS FOR QUANTITY OF ADA SEATING, ACCESS/EGRESS TO ADA SEATING, & DISPERSAL OF ADA SEATING. ALL FIELD CONNECTIONS ARE NON-SLIP CRITICAL U.N.O. ALL CONNECTIONS ARE DESIGNED TO UTILIZE A307 BOLTS, IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO USE A325N BOLTS IN LIEU OF THE A307 BOLTS. THE INSTALLATION OF THESE BOLTS ARE TO BE TIGHTENED A SNUG TIGHT CONDITION AS SPECIFIED BY AISC. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3' - 3 " 6 R I S E S @ 6. 5 " = 3 9 " 4' - 0 " 3' - 6 " 1 2 3 4 5 8 6'-2" (4) 2X8D, (3) 2X10D & (1) 2X10H2K 1' - 4 " 2'-8" 5'-8 1/2" A B 4'-7 1/16"4'-7 1/16"4'-7 1/16"4'-7 1/16"4'-7 1/16" 1'-0" 4" 1" CLEAR SCALE:1/2"=1'-0" SECTION VIEW DBL. L2X2X3/16" STRUT W/C7X9.8 TYP. @"A" ROW 7 1 1 / 1 6 " CL E A R 6 7 1'-0"4'-7 1/16" 4'-7 1/16"90 DEG ANGLE 1 1/2" 15'-0"9'-4 1/2" C 24'-4 1/2" 4S N 3' - 0 " (3) 1X6.5 PAINTED FLAT RISERS (COLOR: CHOSEN BY OWNER) 1 1 1 1 5'-10 3/8" DRAWN SHEET JOB NUMBER BY DATE RE V DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E OF CHECKED TY P E TIT L E Fa x : 9 4 0 / 5 4 9 - 1 3 6 5 80 1 F i f t h S t r e e t . PO B o x O n e , G r a h a m , T e x a s 7 6 4 5 0 Es t a b l i s h e d 1 9 4 6 Ph o n e : 9 4 0 / 5 4 9 - 0 7 3 3 GR A N D S T A N D S B L E A C H E R S S T A D I U M S BL E A C H E R C O M P A N Y R 1 DE T A I L N U M B E R SH E E T N U M B E R 22 " X 3 4 " ( 1 1 x 1 7 = 1 / 2 i n d i c a t e d s c a l e ) A B C D A B C D 123456 123456 1 2 SE C T I O N V I E W - B I G G E R S T A N D NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N TH I S D R A W I N G A N D A L L I N F O R M A T I O N T H E R E I N I S T H E PR O P E R T Y O F T H E S O U T H E R N B L E A C H E R C O M P A N Y , CO P I E D . T H I S D R A W I N G I S L O A N E D S U B J E C T T O R E - AN D I S C O N F I D E N T I A L A N D M U S T N O T B E M A D E P U B L I C O R TU R N U P O N D E M A N D A N D , I S N O T T O B E U S E D DI R E C T L Y O R I N D I R E C T L Y I N A N Y W A Y D E T R I M E N T A L TO O U R I N T E R E S T S . #20SD156 20SD156 5 9/21/20 AJL LD 16 " & 1 2 " R I S E X 3 2 " & 2 6 " T R E A D / M I T E R E D & 3 6 ' - 0 " ( 6 & 5 R O W S ) HA M E L B A S E B A L L ME D I N A , M I N N E S O T A 1 JJ 8/2 6 / 2 1 CO L U M N S / R O W S ℄ 36'-0" ASSUMED BACKSTOP 16' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 135. 0 0 0 0 ° 135.00 0 0 ° 30 ' - 0 " 1: 1 2 R A M P 8'-0" X 12'-0" PB BY OTHERS 6'-0"6'-0" 4'-7 " 4'-7" 5'-8" TYP. SCALE:1/8"=1'-0" SEATING LAYOUT BIGGER FIELD OFFSET HANDRAILS TYP. 5'-11 3/4"4'-5"5'-0"5'-0"12'-0"5'-0"5'-0"4'-5"5'-11 3/4"5'-11 3/4"5'-11 3/4"5'- 1 1 / 2 "LANDING15' - 1 5 / 1 6 " 15' - 1 5 / 1 6 " 20'-8 11/16"20'-8 11/16" 15 ' - 1 5 / 1 6 " 15 ' - 1 5 / 1 6 " 10'-7 1/2"10'-7 1/2"20'-0" 3 4 5 6 1 8 7 2 9 A B 5'- 8 1 / 2 " 15 ' - 0 " 9' - 4 1 / 2 " C 36'-0" ASSUMED BACKSTOP 16'-0 " 16'-0" 135. 0 0 0 0 ° 135.000 0 ° 11' - 4 " 5'-10" 26' - 8 1 / 2 " 26'-11" 15'-5 1/2" 5'-6 " 5'- 1 0 " 10 1 / 2 " 15' - 5 1 / 2 " 10 1 / 2 " 1 1 1 64'-9 7/16" 30'-4 3 / 4 " 12' - 0 " 1:1 2 R A M P 6'-0" PRE-FAB STARTER RAMP 30'-4 3/4" 4'-0"4'-0" 16'-10 1/16"16'-10 1/16" 20'-1 9 / 1 6 " 20 ' - 1 9 / 1 6 " SCALE:1/8"=1'-0" FOOTING LAYOUT 18'-1 0 1 / 8 " 18 ' - 1 0 1 / 8 " DRAWN SHEET JOB NUMBER BY DATE RE V DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E OF CHECKED TY P E TIT L E Fa x : 9 4 0 / 5 4 9 - 1 3 6 5 80 1 F i f t h S t r e e t . PO B o x O n e , G r a h a m , T e x a s 7 6 4 5 0 Es t a b l i s h e d 1 9 4 6 Ph o n e : 9 4 0 / 5 4 9 - 0 7 3 3 GR A N D S T A N D S B L E A C H E R S S T A D I U M S BL E A C H E R C O M P A N Y R 1 DE T A I L N U M B E R SH E E T N U M B E R 22 " X 3 4 " ( 1 1 x 1 7 = 1 / 2 i n d i c a t e d s c a l e ) A B C D A B C D 123456 123456 1 3 PL A N V I E W S - B I G G E R S T A N D NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N TH I S D R A W I N G A N D A L L I N F O R M A T I O N T H E R E I N I S T H E PR O P E R T Y O F T H E S O U T H E R N B L E A C H E R C O M P A N Y , CO P I E D . T H I S D R A W I N G I S L O A N E D S U B J E C T T O R E - AN D I S C O N F I D E N T I A L A N D M U S T N O T B E M A D E P U B L I C O R TU R N U P O N D E M A N D A N D , I S N O T T O B E U S E D DI R E C T L Y O R I N D I R E C T L Y I N A N Y W A Y D E T R I M E N T A L TO O U R I N T E R E S T S . #20SD156 20SD156 5 9/21/20 AJL LD 16 " & 1 2 " R I S E X 3 2 " & 2 6 " T R E A D / M I T E R E D & 3 6 ' - 0 " ( 6 & 5 R O W S ) HA M E L B A S E B A L L ME D I N A , M I N N E S O T A 1 JJ 8/2 6 / 2 1 CO L U M N S / R O W S 29(5+($'%$&.67231(77,1*6<67(0/$<287 3ROH1HZ6WUXFWXUH7LH%DFN6\VWHP )257,1 ),(/' +$0(/ 01 7LH%DFNV$GGHG,QWR 1HZ2YHUKDQJ6WUXFWXUH · · · a·&DEOLQJ 3ROHWR1HWWLQJ a·&DEOLQJ 3ROHWR7LH%DFN a·&DEOLQJ 3ROHWR1HWWLQJ a·&DEOLQJ 3ROHWR7LH%DFN .H\ 0DLQ&DEOH a ·/ 7HUPLQDWLRQ3RLQWV #3ROHV7%' 7LH%DFN&DEOLQJ a·/ 7HUPLQDWLRQ3RLQWV #6WUXFWXUH·$)* %DFNVWRS1HWWLQJ ·/[·+ a·$ERYH)LHOG*UDGH 1HZ7HUPLQDWLRQ3ROHV %DVHRI3ROHV #)LHOG*UDGH 'LDPHWHU+HLJKW )RXQGDWLRQV7%' $)* $ERYH)LHOG*UDGH 1(:*5$1'67$1'9,(:%$&.67231(77,1*6<67(0/$<287 3ROH1HZ6WUXFWXUH7LH%DFN6\VWHP )257,1 ),(/' +$0(/ 01 5'C PRE -TAB STARTER RAMP d'�C' .i �C' 4'�5' -�� � p .i 1Yd511n1Ye't-31.211• 'T �FlfilC7 Flit T t 1-1 T t r t 107:7 C•) tsti */. 36 ASSUMED BACKSTOP 90 TOTAL NET 22" INTERKAL AURA CHAIRS' 264 TOTAL NET 18" SEATS SEATING LAYOUT BIGGER HELD 6 TOTAL NET 33" WHEELCHAIR SPACES 5CA TS S- 360 TOTAL SEATING CAPACITY 8/1/22, 5:00 PM https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/PrintMessage https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/PrintMessage 1/1 From:tatob1959@gmail.com, To:timatobin@aol.com, Date:Mon, Aug 1, 2022 4:52 pm Attachments: 8/1/22, 4:59 PM https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/PrintMessage https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/PrintMessage 1/1 From:tatob1959@gmail.com, To:timatobin@aol.com, Date:Mon, Aug 1, 2022 4:51 pm Attachments: 8/1/22, 5:01 PM https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/PrintMessage https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/PrintMessage 1/1 From:tatob1959@gmail.com, To:timatobin@aol.com, Date:Mon, Aug 1, 2022 4:54 pm Attachments: 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Medina Park Commission FROM: Lisa DeMars, Public Works Administrative Assistant DATE OF REPORT: August 11, 2022 DATE OF MEETING: August 17, 2022 SUBJECT: Park Commission Meeting Report 2. Additions to Agenda If any Park Commissioner wishes to add an item to the agenda after the agenda has already been posted, the agenda item must be proposed at this point in the meeting. The Park Commission must agree to add the item by motion. No attachments for this item. 4. City Council Update This is a reoccurring agenda item to have the City Council Liaison to the Park Commission give an update at each meeting on what is happening at the Council level. City Council member Joseph Cavanaugh has been appointed as the Liaison to the Park Commission for 2022. No attachments for this item. 5. Loram/Scannell Properties - Preliminary Plat Planning Director Dusty Finke’s report provides background information on the applicant’s request to subdivide approximately 25 acres of property into three lots east of Arrowhead Drive, south of Highway 55. The Park Commission should review the park and trail map and make a recommendation on park dedication for the proposed subdivision. The City’s subdivision ordinance requires the dedication of up to 10% of the buildable property, a cash payment in-lieu of land dedication, or some combination. The City’s park plan does not call for parkland in the area of the subject site and the trail plan identifies the existing trail along Arrowhead Drive. See attached report. Recommended Action: Make recommendation on Park Dedication that additional trail easement be required, and cash in-lieu of additional land dedication as described in the staff report. 6. Grandstand Proposal – Paul Fortin Field – Hamel Legion Park Hamel Athletic Club (HAC) Board Member Ryan Wilson and HAC General Manager / Hamel Lions President Greg DeVos will be present at the meeting to discuss ongoing planning to build a grandstand at the Paul Fortin Memorial Field in Hamel Legion Park. In July 2021 HAC presented their vision to the Park Commission and was not requesting City funds but wanted general support from the City for the project so they could begin fundraising and soliciting corporate donors for the project. To assist in Phase II of their vision, HAC is respectfully requesting the City to contribute up to $114,767.00 (20% of total cost), is asking for any permit fees to be waived, and is asking the City to provide support with site preparations and restorations. See attached memos, cost estimates, and plans. Recommended Action: Open discussion and make recommendation to the City Council for approval of project plans, monetary and service contributions. 2 7. Park Overview / Update This is a reoccurring agenda item where Park Commissioners can provide brief updates on their park assignments. Park Commissioner Troy Hutchinson to initiate continued discussion on Lakeshore Park improvements as well as Maple Park discussion and possible improvements based on several residents who have raised proposals. No attachments for this item. Recommended Action: Open Discussion; Q&A. 8. Goals / Vision / Strategic Planning for Park Commission and Streamlining Requests Park Commissioner Troy Hutchinson to open discussion. No attachments for this item. Recommended Action: Open Discussion; Q&A. 9. Municipal Park Fund / Asset Inventory / Grants / Funding Needs This is a reoccurring agenda item to review and maintain asset inventory, determine life of assets, replacement year, grant opportunities, and needed funds for future replacement. No attachments for this item. Recommended Action: Open Discussion; Q&A. Staff Report Youth Park Commissioner Status. Two applications were received and reviewed: a recommendation will be made to the City Council for appointment. 2022 Field Reservation Update. On July 7th the City of Plymouth Public Works rented one of the quad ballfields at Hamel Legion to play a team-building-just-for-fun game. Kankakee SpikeBall (Minnesota Roundnet) rented open space at Hamel Legion on July 23rd for a tournament. On July 28th a candidate who is running for the MN legislature held an ice cream social for members of the community at one of the pavilions in Hamel Legion Park. Although the pavilions are first-come, first-serve, I asked the candidate to complete a field rental application which would serve as the permit; should the attendance reach the 50 person threshold as noted in City Code 515. Park Maintenance Update: The tennis courts at Hamel Legion will be resurfaced close to the same time as Hunter Park. We will work with Agre Tennis to reschedule their practices to another park. Both tennis nets have holes, so will be replaced. The soccer nets at The Park at Fields of Medina are shot and will be replaced soon. Renovations are Hunter Park are well underway, asphalt has been installed on the new court, interior poles, surface coating and fencing have been installed, the infield has been seeded, and dugouts have been prepped for concrete. Parkland Acquisition Update: The parkland acquisition on Chippewa Road is complete. The City will work on removal/demolition of the existing structures before an agenda item is added to the Park Commission meeting packet for future planning of the land. Park Commission Representation at City Council Meetings. Upcoming council meetings will be held on September 6th and 20th, and October 4th and 18th. (Mary Morrison is on the roster for September; Terry Sharp is on the roster for October) Staff representation at the August 17th Park Commission meeting will be Public Works Director Steve Scherer, Public Works Administrative Assistant Lisa DeMars, and Planning Director Dusty Finke.