Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
08.16.2022 City Council Packet
Posted 08/12/2022 Page 1 of 1 AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, August 16, 2022 7:00 P.M. Medina City Hall 2052 County Road 24 I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of the August 3, 2022 Regular Council Meeting V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Resolution Accepting the Resignation of Community Service Officer Jackson Carroll-Billman B. Approve Resolution Granting Extension to File for Final Plat Approval for Pioneer Trail Reserve C. Approve WSB Service Quote for Wellhead Protection Plan Amendment Part 1 D. Approve Chippewa Road Watermain Extension Agreement E. Appoint June Ney to Youth Park Commission Seat VI. COMMENTS A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda B. Park Commission C. Planning Commission VII. PRESENTATION A. Resolution Recognizing Administrative Assistant to the Police Department Anne Klaers for Fifteen Years of Service to the City of Medina VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Medina Apartments LLC – 500 Hamel Road – Concept Plan Review B. Hamel Townhomes 1. Resolution Granting Final Plat for Hamel Townhomes – 342 Hamel Road 2. Development Agreement C. Industrial Park Integrated Development Ordinance 1. Ordinance Amending Chapter 8 of the City Code Pertaining to Lot Standards within Integrated Developments 2. Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance by Title and Summary D. Community Service Officer Hiring IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS XI. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS XII. ADJOURN Meeting Rules of Conduct to Address the City Council: • Fill out & turn in comment card • Give name and address • Indicate if representing a group • Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes MEMORANDUM TO: Medina Mayor and City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: August 11, 2022 DATE OF MEETING: August 16, 2022 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Resolution Accepting Resignation of Community Service Officer Jackson Carroll-Billman – Community Service Officer Jackson Carroll-Billman has resigned from his position. His last day with the Medina Police Department was August 9, 2022. Staff recommends approval of the resolution accepting Jackson Carroll-Billman’s resignation. See attached memo and resolution. B. Approve Resolution Granting Extension to File for Final Plat Approval for Pioneer Trail Reserve – The Applicants have requested a further extension of time to request final plat approval. Staff recommends approval. See attached resolution. C. Approve WSB Service Quote for Wellhead Protection Plan Amendment Part 1 – Part 1 of the wellhead protection plan amendment consists of modeling to determine the wellhead protection area, the drinking water supply management area (DWSMA), a vulnerability assessment, and the associated reporting involved. WSB submitted a proposal for (up to) $22,250.00 to complete Part 1 which will determine what, if anything, must be done for Part 2. Grant funding is not available for Part 1, however is available for Part 2. Staff recommends approval. See attached memo. D. Approve Chippewa Road Watermain Extension Quote – The City of Medina has been working to close the gap on the secondary line leading to the water tower on Willow Drive for several years. The wells are located on the east end of town (where the water source is the best) and brought to the treatment plant for treatment. From the treatment plant we have relied on a single watermain along Hwy 55 for our trunk connection to the water tower for storage. As development has occurred, we have worked our way west with a secondary line to the western property line of Polaris, so we have redundancy to the system. Staff recommends moving forward with the watermain extension. See attached memo. 2 E. Appoint June Ney to Youth Park Commission Seat – Medina’s Park Commission Ordinance allows for the appointment of up to two youth members. The youth member seats serve one-year terms with the ability to renew for one additional year. The youth members are encouraged to actively participate in meetings and on subcommittees, but they are non-voting members to not interfere with meeting quorums. The Youth Park Commission opening was advertised on the City webpage and in the City newsletter; two applications were received by the posted deadline. Park Commissioner Chair Mary Morrison, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, and Public Works Administrative Assistant Lisa DeMars reviewed and evaluated the youth member applications and are recommending the appointment of June Ney. VII. PRESENTATION A. Resolution Recognizing Administrative Assistant to the Police Department Anne Klaers for Fifteen Years of Service so the City of Medina – Anne Klaers is a valuable employee for the City of Medina who has contributed to the organization in various roles over the years. Mayor Martin will read the resolution and honor Anne for her 15 years of service. See attached resolution. VIII. NEW BUSINESS F. Medina Apartments LLC – 500 Hamel Road – Concept Plan Review – Medina Apartments LLC has requested review of a concept plan review for development of a 97- unit apartment project at 500 Hamel Road. The subject property is located north of Hamel Road, across from Elm Creek Drive. The property is approximately 6.7 acres in size (4.9 net acres), is currently vacant and guided and zoned Uptown Hamel. The purpose of a Concept Plan is to provide feedback to the applicant prior to a formal application. Generally, the City Council does not take formal action and the feedback is purely advisory. G. Hamel Townhomes – At the regular meeting of the Medina City Council on June 7, 2022, the Council considered and approved (subject to conditions) the preliminary plat and site and building plan applications of Hamel Townhomes, LLC for the “Hamel Townhomes.” The project overlays an approximate 2-acre site located at 342 Hamel Road and consists of 30 townhomes (within five buildings). At this time, Hamel Townhomes, LLC is seeking final plat approval of the subdivision. Consistent with the approved preliminary plat, the final plat consists of 30 townhome unit lots and an outlot which overlays common areas within the development. 3 Potential Actions: 1. Move to adopt the resolution granting final plat approval of the Hamel Townhomes subdivision. 2. Move to approve the development agreement by and between the City of Medina and Hamel Townhomes LLC H. Industrial Park Integrated Development Ordinance – The City’s zoning regulations include various provisions which provide flexibility for integrated developments which share site improvements. This flexibility allows for it to be easier for adjacent buildings to be owned by separate parties, but to still be developed in a cohesive way to share access, parking, stormwater, and similar improvements. Staff believes these provisions are positive and provide opportunity to improve the layout and function of commercial development sites. The Industrial Park (IP) zoning district does not include provisions similar to the Business and Commercial zoning districts which would explicitly allow similar flexibility. Staff is requesting City Council review and direction on this option. Potential Actions: 1. Move to adopt the ordinance pertaining to lot standards within Integrated Developments. 2. Move to adopt the resolution authorizing publication by title and summary I. Community Service Officer Hiring – Chief Nelson is requesting to combine the two-part time Community Service Officer positions that we are currently authorized to have, into one full-time position. Finance Director Barnhart did a financial analysis on this option and advised there would be a cost savings of approximately $3,000 in 2023 with one full- time position. He is requesting the City Council move forward with this option for the Community Service Officer position. Staff is requesting City Council review and direct on this option. Potential Action: 1. Approve the hiring of Ashley Lewerenz to the position of full-time Community Service Officer, contingent on the successful passing of her background check and medical examination, with a beginning hourly wage (non-exempt) of $21/hr. and other benefits to be at the same rate as other non-union employees, in accordance with the City Personnel Policy. A probationary period of 12-months is recommended for the position, starting from the date of hire. X. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 006476E-006496E for $52,590.54, and order check numbers 053279-053337 for $577,902.36, and payroll EFT 0512051-0512086 for $57,730.8, and payroll manual check 020453 for $3,797.84. 4 INFORMATION PACKET: • Planning Department Update • Police Department Update • Public Works Department Update • Claims List Medina City Council Meeting Minutes August 3, 2022 1 DRAFT 1 2 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 3, 2022 3 4 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on August 3, 2022 at 7:00 5 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Martin presided. 6 7 I. ROLL CALL 8 9 Members present: Albers, Cavanaugh, DesLauriers, Martin, and Reid . 10 11 Members absent: None . 12 13 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, Attorney Dave Anderson, Finance 14 Director Erin Barnhart, City Engineer Jim Stremel, City Planning Director Dusty Finke, 15 Public Works Director Steve Scherer, City Clerk/Assistant to the City Administrator 16 Caitlyn Walker, and Chief of Police Jason Nelson. 17 18 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:00 p.m.) 19 20 III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:00 p.m.) 21 The agenda was approved as presented. 22 23 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:00 p.m.) 24 25 A. Approval of the July 19, 202 2 Work Session City Council Meeting Minutes 26 Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by DesLauriers, to approve the July 19, 20 22 work 27 session City Council meeting minutes as presented. Motion passed unanimously. 28 29 B. Approval of the July 19, 202 2 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 30 Martin noted that prior to the meeting, Johnson distributed changes as proposed by 31 herself for incorporation into the minutes. 32 33 Moved by Albers, seconded by Reid, to approve the July 19, 2022 regular City Council 34 meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 35 36 V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:02 p.m.) 37 38 A. Approve Resolution Accepting the Resignation of Officer Jeremiah Jessen 39 and Authorize Recruitment of Vacant Patrol Officer Position 40 B. Accept Donations for the 2022 Cops and Bobbers Program 41 Johnson recognized Nelson and his team for a great Cops and Bobber event. 42 43 Moved by Albers, seconded by Reid, to approve the consent agenda. Motion passed 44 unanimously. 45 46 VI. COMMENTS (7:03 p.m.) 47 48 A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 49 There were none. 50 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes August 3, 2022 2 B. Park Commission 1 Scherer reported that the Commission will meet in a few weeks and will discuss the 2 Lakeshore Park improvement, reviewing some concepts that focus on utilization of the 3 lake. He stated that there is a proposal for grandstand improvements at Paul Fortin 4 Field that will be reviewed. He also provided an update on the pickleball court and the 5 anticipated opening later this fall. 6 7 C. Planning Commission 8 Finke reported that the Planning Commission will meet the following week to conduct 9 four public hearings. He stated that the Commission will review a concept plan for a 97-10 unit apartment building at 500 Hamel Road, an ordinance amendment related to 11 requirements within the business/industrial/commercial zoning districts that are part of 12 an integrated development, a request from the Loram/Scannell development on 13 Arrowhead Drive, and a proposed amendment to the Weston Woods PUD related to 14 building height for the single -family homes. 15 16 DesLauriers asked the increase in height desired. 17 18 Finke replied that the desired height would be 32 to 36 feet for the average grade and 19 the indication is that most of the lots would not push up to 36 feet, noting that would 20 most likely be for the lots adjacent to ponds/wetlands. 21 22 Martin asked how it would compare to Charles Cudd and Medina Golf Course, 23 requesting that information in the packet. 24 25 Finke replied that those were mostly single-story villa homes. 26 27 Cavanaugh stated that there are homes along CR 116 that are two story and perhaps 28 that comparison information can be provided. 29 30 Finke stated that the City has also received five other applications in the process. 31 32 VII. NEW BUSINESS 33 34 A. SH Ventures, Inc. Lifestyle Auto Condos PUD Concept Plan (7:10 p.m.) 35 Johnson stated that the applicant is requesting review of a concept plan for individually 36 owned auto condos on the subject site. He noted that the Council reviewed a similar 37 concept and advised that this has been reduced in scope. 38 39 Finke noted that the Council has reviewed the information in the packet and advised that 40 the residents present were also present at the Planning Commission meeting, therefore 41 he will not go into as much depth in the presentation. He highlighted changes made 42 from the concept the Council reviewed in the fall including a reduction in the number of 43 buildings and overall footprint. He noted that the concept does include some mezzanine 44 space, similar to the Auto MotorPlex. He stated that the property is designated FDA and 45 provided background information on that guidance and its intention within the 46 Comprehensive Plan. He displayed the proposed concept plan and noted one of the 47 significant changes is the point of access. He noted that the first concept proposed 48 access from Highway 55 whereas this concept would propose access from the east to 49 Pioneer Trail. He also reviewed the landscaping plan and building layout and elevations. 50 He reviewed the objectives of a PUD. He noted that this case is different than most 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes August 3, 2022 3 PUD’s, as most PUD’s have a planned development zone and the PUD uses those 1 zoning regulations as a comparison. He stated that in this case the existing zoning is 2 UR-RR and therefore it would be difficult to compare those zoning regulations to this 3 type of commercial development. He stated that feedback could be provided on the 4 overall concept, but the bigger questions would be whether non-residential uses would 5 be considered within FDA and whether that would be consistent with the Comprehensive 6 Plan. 7 8 Martin suggested the Council begin with whether they would consider accelerating 9 development within FDA and if so, whether this would be a candidate within FDA for this 10 parcel. 11 12 Finke stated that if the Council is open to this concept, perhaps the Rural Business 13 Holding (RBH) standards are considered as the base standards for development. He 14 stated that there is currently not any property zoned RBH within FDA. He briefly 15 reviewed the RBH standards. 16 17 Cavanaugh stated that the key component for this parcel would be proper easements 18 and right-of-way, noting that this seems to be going in the right direction. He stated that 19 the item that gives him pause is whether this project is good for this site. He was unsure 20 that this would be the perfect product for the site. He noted that this would be all 21 individual users but there would be low intensity on City services in return for high 22 property tax. He stated that while it may not be the perfect fit, he believes it would be 23 good for the City. 24 25 Albers stated that the Steering Committee for the Comprehensive Plan reviewed areas 26 that may have more intense use and/or residential development. He noted that this 27 parcel specifically was discussed for potential future needs for sewer and water between 28 Medina, Corcoran, and Rockford. He noted that if the infrastructure were to come 29 through, Medina would be able to meet its requirements on this parcel and therefore 30 believes that the FDA parcels should remain FDA. 31 32 Reid stated that she agrees with Albers and did not see a reason to do a PUD in FDA. 33 She did not believe this is a good location because of that. She stated that if projects 34 are developed in FDA, the planning that was done for the Comprehensive Plan then 35 goes out the window. She stated that this applicant was in previously and there was a 36 lengthy discussion on FDA and has returned with basically the same proposal. She 37 stated that she still does not support this use in FDA. 38 39 DesLauriers stated that he appreciates the developers coming forward with some 40 revisions to the plan and with a use that has limited impact on City resources in return 41 for an increased tax base. He stated that he struggles with the FDA zoning and noted 42 that there are too many unknowns at this time related to infrastructure. He commented 43 that although he is unsure this parcel would be developed as homes, he did not believe 44 this development would be the right fit. 45 46 Martin agreed with the comments thus far. She noted that this development would have 47 a permanency to it. She stated that this is also part of a gateway to Medina and 48 believed this area will have more intense City services in the future and will be needed to 49 accommodate growth. She stated that she is inclined to say this does not work without 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes August 3, 2022 4 going into all the details. She was concerned with the sanitary sewer usage and what 1 would be required for this use. 2 3 Cavanaugh asked if it would make a difference if this were to be owned by one party 4 rather than individual condo ownership. He agreed that the permanency is also an issue 5 for him. 6 7 Martin commented that even without the condo ownership, this would still be nine 8 buildings and it would be almost impossible to convert to residential or another use in the 9 future. She referenced a recently approved rezoning from FDA and noted that decision 10 was partially based on a historical agreement with the landowner. 11 12 Bill Stoddard , SH Ventures, commented that they redesigned and engineered the project 13 from the first concept to take into account the proposed access. He noted that they 14 would be purchasing additional land in order to provide the access to Pioneer. He noted 15 that they downsized the project with about five acres of development and would be 16 dedicating about 3.6 acres of right-of-way to the City. He stated that if this development 17 were approved, the City would have land from Pioneer all the way to the west property 18 line. He stated that because of the low need for City services, they believe that this 19 would provide $20,000,000 to $25,000,000 in tax dollars by the time City services would 20 come to this area. He noted that they would propose to leave the site to the east 21 undeveloped at this time. He commented that noise and maintenance would be 22 addressed under the HOA for the development and believe this use would have less 23 impact than a nursery, which would be an allowed use. He stated that they would 24 propose six to eight events per year. He stated that the proposed access would be from 25 Pioneer, but they could easily change that to Highway 55 in order to take into account 26 the comments from residents. He noted that they would have onsite security for events. 27 He noted that they would also have control over whether the billboard lease is renewed 28 or removed. He reviewed some of his development experience and believe that this 29 would provide benefit to the community in return for the requested PUD status. 30 31 DesLauriers asked the location of the land to be dedicated to the City. 32 33 Finke identified the land proposed for dedication. 34 35 Martin asked about the current bituminous width of Highway 55. 36 37 Finke replied that this segment currently has two lanes. 38 39 Martin noted that 66 feet of right-of-way would not even be enough to get to four lanes. 40 She noted that the right-of-way does not extend fully to Pioneer and noted that will be a 41 tricky intersection to engineer in the future. She noted that part of the problem is that the 42 City does not know what will happen and what will be needed. She expressed concern 43 with taking what is presented at this time but then finding out that much more is actually 44 needed in the future. She asked legal counsel for an opinion on whether the tax base is 45 an appropriate consideration for the Council. 46 47 Anderson stated that type of issue is always at the back of minds, but the Council should 48 not be considered financials and should focus on policy. He stated that it is not out of 49 bounds to discuss that element, but an approval or denial could not be made based on 50 that factor. 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes August 3, 2022 5 1 Lee Copy, representing the applicant, stated that most of the concerns they heard at the 2 Planning Commission were related to access and setbacks. He noted that the concerns 3 tonight seem to be different. He noted that they would be willing to work with MnDOT 4 and City staff to ensure adequate right-of-way needs are met. He highlighted the 5 changes made since the last review related to access, reduced density, and increased 6 regional infrastructure. He referenced the SAC calculations within the report and 7 believed that those were high, providing additional explanation. He stated that they also 8 reviewed water supply and are confident that the site would have everything it needs to 9 satisfy this development for sewer and water. He stated that they completed a wetland 10 delineation and did a good job avoiding the wetlands to the extent possible. He 11 commented that he is confident that they could treat the stormwater onsite for the 12 development proposed. He recognized the concern of nearby residents related to 13 events, noting that they would only hold six to eight events per year. He stated that 14 when you compare that to an allowed use, such as a nursery, this use would generate 15 much less traffic. He provided more specific information on building area, setbacks, 16 right-of-way, and architectural details. 17 18 Stoddard commented that they could remove building one which would allow the right-19 of-way to be increased. He stated that they could extend the frontage road to Pioneer 20 but believed that would be desired further from the intersection. 21 22 Finke concurred with the applicant related to water usage, based on the actual water 23 usage of the Auto MotorPlex. 24 25 DesLauriers stated that parcel B looks like a nice piece of land that could easily fit three 26 to four more units and asked the future intent. 27 28 Stoddard replied that they clustered the units to the west based on comments received 29 and they would leave the other portion open. He stated that the new property under 30 contract to the east has a footprint for about 20,000 square feet which would allow some 31 type of use after MnDOT makes its determinations for the area. 32 33 Cavanaugh commented that there does not seem to be support for this concept. He 34 asked if there are any conditions under which the Council would be willing to accept this 35 development. 36 37 Martin commented that if this development were to be constructed, it would be there for 38 a long time, well into the time it is known what will be done in this area of the community. 39 She stated that she struggles with a condominium use. She noted that a horse farm, 40 hobby farm, or nursery could easily be converted to something else because they do not 41 have many structures or infrastructure. She stated that if this project were to be 42 developed, there would not be an opportunity to convert it to something else that may be 43 desired in the future. She stated that she would not support an auto condo use on this 44 parcel. She noted that this is an informal review but summarized the consensus of the 45 Council that it would not support this permanent type of use on this property. She stated 46 that it is also too early to determine the required infrastructure needs for this area and 47 therefore it should continue to be preserved for future development needs. 48 49 Cavanaugh asked if three homes could be built on the property under the current zoning. 50 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes August 3, 2022 6 Finke provided more details on what would be allowed under RR-UR, noting a 20-acre 1 minimum lot size. He stated that a request for three homes would follow a similar 2 process. 3 4 Paul Larson, real estate agent for the project, stated that the property has been for sale 5 for years. He commented that the land is not residential and has always been 6 commercial. He referenced Resolution 91-42 which provided unanimous approval for an 7 auto shop on the parcel in 1991. He stated that he was informed by staff that the zoning 8 was changed in 2019 and the owners of the property were never made aware of that 9 change. He noted that the owners of the property are out of state during the winter 10 months. He commented that this land is adjacent to the highway that has high volumes 11 of traffic and also near two billboards, which does not lend itself towards residential use. 12 He also provided details on the adjacent property uses and stated that the rezoning 13 almost equates to a taking of the property. He stated that if the property owners would 14 have been aware of the desire to rezone, they would have objected. He referenced 15 language for the covenant and restrictions for the private road document which states 16 that a maximum of seven homes could be constructed. He stated that the homes could 17 each have 5,000 square foot barns, which would be similar in scale to the proposed 18 development. 19 20 Martin noted that both she and Albers were on the Steering Committee for the 21 Comprehensive Plan. She noted the numerous public meetings that were noticed to the 22 public which provided opportunity for the public to provide input. 23 24 Albers agreed noting that the process took about 18 months and included many unique 25 engagement opportunities and events. 26 27 Anderson commented that staff is willing to look at the documents and provide comment. 28 29 B. City of Independence Quad Cities Sewer Agreement Request Discussion 30 (8:15 p.m.) 31 Johnson provided background information on the request from the City of Independence. 32 33 Finke stated that this pertains to the sewer along CR 19/CR 29 and serves the cities of 34 Greenfield, Independence and Loretto before coming into Medina. He noted that there 35 is an agreement that describes the number of connections allowed for each community. 36 Independence is requesting 26 additional units south of Lake Independence. He noted 37 that all four cities would need to agree to the additional units. He reviewed some of the 38 considerations that would go along with adding additional units including the capacity of 39 gravity sewer main. 40 41 Scherer provided additional background on previous improvements. He noted that this 42 would tie in south of the lift station. He stated that he would want to ensure there is 43 capacity to support the planned development and units within the agreement before 44 considering additional units for another community. 45 46 Finke stated that initially staff was cold to the request but because this would be south of 47 the lift station, it would be easy to differentiate this land from other land adjacent to the 48 sewer. He stated that this request could open the door for other communities to request 49 additional units. He reviewed additional considerations including metering waste. He 50 stated that in his opinion it is a consistency issue in terms of land use and provided 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes August 3, 2022 7 additional details. He stated that although staff was originally cold to the request, after 1 the discussion with Independence, staff could be open to it given the suggestions within 2 the report are considered and additional analysis is provided at the expense of the 3 developer. He stated that there is concern with opening the door to additional requests. 4 5 Martin commented that her concern would be that the needs of the future are not yet 6 known and therefore she is not inclined to sacrifice some of the potential capacity. She 7 stated that she also likes to be a good neighbor. 8 9 Finke stated that Independence did allow Loretto to come into the agreement as well as 10 Greenfield. 11 12 Martin asked if the City works with Independence to share services. 13 14 Johnson replied that Medina has a good working relationship with Independence and 15 provided examples. 16 17 Martin commented that she would put the ball back in the court of staff. 18 19 Scherer stated that his concern would be related to capacity but noted that he could 20 work with Finke to further review those concerns. 21 22 Martin stated that if this were to proceed, it should be made clear that this is an 23 exception and would not happen again as the capacity needs to be protected for land 24 uses that may get developed in the next 15 to 20 years. She stated that she would not 25 want to see Medina have to develop additional infrastructure because it has been used 26 by another community. 27 28 Cavanaugh asked if the final exit of the sewer is located at CR 12/CR 29. 29 30 Scherer provided details on the path of the sewer to the lift station. 31 32 Cavanaugh referenced the examples of cost sharing and asked for details. He stated 33 that it would seem that everyone’s waste goes through one section of pipe where 34 Medina would seem to be solely responsible for the cost for repair. 35 36 Scherer stated that the Metropolitan Council is currently reimbursing costs for repairs in 37 a certain segment because of the shared use. He stated that he is fine with the new 38 agreement as funds are received annually from the Metropolitan Council under that new 39 agreement. 40 41 Barnhart provided details on the financing received from the Metropolitan Council for this 42 infrastructure under the new agreement. 43 44 Martin commented that this is such a radical improvement from what previously existed 45 and commended staff. 46 47 Finke stated that it seems that the Council has a similar luke-cold response. 48 49 Cavanaugh suggested that if this moves forward there is a contribution from the 50 developer made that could be used for future improvements. 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes August 3, 2022 8 1 Martin agreed and noted that those funds could be placed into some type of reserve 2 account. 3 4 VIII. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (8:35 p.m.) 5 Johnson thanked Nelson and his staff for their efforts at the Nite to Unite parties and 6 also thanked the members of the Council that attended parties. 7 8 Martin commented that it was fun to go to the different parties and thanked the Police for 9 their contributions. 10 11 IX. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (8:36 p.m.) 12 Martin commented that she and Albers attended the Fire District meeting this morning 13 and noted that it seems people may be interested in pursuing the concept. She noted 14 that the City of Orono joined the group today. She stated that each city representative 15 was directed to go back to their respective City Council to ensure there continues to be 16 support for the concept. Martin confirmed continued support of the concept from the City 17 Council. She also noted the upcoming Mayor’s party. 18 19 X. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (8:39 p.m.) 20 Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Martin, to approve the bills, EFT 006455E-006475E 21 for $980,178.60, order check numbers 053205-053278 for $600,972.64, and payroll EFT 22 0512020-0512050 for $64,957.73. Motion passed unanimously. 23 24 XI. ADJOURN 25 Moved by Albers, seconded by DesLauriers, to adjourn the meeting at 8:41 p.m. Motion 26 passed unanimously. 27 28 29 30 __________________________________ 31 Kathy Martin, Mayor 32 Attest: 33 34 ____________________________________ 35 Scott Johnson, City Administrator 36 TO: Mayor Kathleen Martin and City Council FROM: Jason Nelson, Director of Public Safety, Through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: August 11, 2022 RE: Resignation Letter from Community Service Officer Jackson Billman Background On August 8, 2022, I received a resignation letter from Community Service Officer Billman. Community Service Officer Billman has been with the department since October 2020, and he will be missed. Community Service Officer Billman has advised me that he has accepted a police officer position with the Brooklyn Center Police Department as starting on August 15, 2022. Recommendation: I request the City Council approve a motion to accept Jackson Billman’s resignation from his position as community service officer with the City of Medina effective August 9, 2022. MEMORANDUM Agenda Item #5A Resolution No. 2022- August 16, 2022 Member ____ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2022- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING RESIGNATION OF COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER JACKSON CARROLL-BILLMAN WHEREAS, Jackson Carroll-Billman began employment with the City of Medina as a Community Service Officer in the Police Department on October 27, 2020; and WHEREAS, on August 8, 2022, Jackson Carroll-Billman submitted a letter of resignation from his position addressed to the Public Safety Director; and WHEREAS, Jackson Carroll-Billman’s resignation from his position is effective August 9, 2022. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that Jackson Carroll-Billman’s letter of resignation is hereby accepted. Dated: August 16, 2022. ______________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ______ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2022-## August 16, 2022 Member _________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2022-## RESOLUTION GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO REQUEST FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR PIONEER TRAIL PRESERVE; AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2021-39 WHEREAS, on June 15, 2021, the city of Medina adopted Resolution 2021-39, granting preliminary approval to James R. Korin and Melissa A. Korin (the “Applicants”) of a plat to be called Pioneer Trail Preserve; and WHEREAS, under the terms of said resolution, the application for final approval was required to be requested within 180 days or the approval was to be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the Applicants and approved by the City Council; and WHEREAS, on September 7, 2021, the City Council adopted resolution 2021-54, granting the Applicant’s request for an extension of one year to request final plat approval; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have requested a further extension of time to request final plat approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The final plat approval shall be requested by September 7, 2023, or preliminary approval shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the Applicant and approved by the City Council. 2. Except as explicitly stated above, all terms and conditions of Resolution 2021-39 are hereby reaffirmed. Dated: Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk Agenda Item #5B Resolution No. 2022-## August 16, 2022 2 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member __________ upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: August 8, 2022 MEETING: August 16, 2022 SUBJECT: Wellhead Protection Professional Engineering Services Quote Summary The City of Medina is required by the Minnesota Department of Heath to review and amend its Wellhead Protection Plan (WHPP) by April 2023. Part 1 of the WHPP consists of modeling to determine the wellhead protection area, the drinking water supply management area (DWSMA), a vulnerability assessment, and the associated reporting involved. WSB submitted the attached proposal for (up to) $22,250.00 to complete Part 1 which will determine what, if anything, must be done for Part 2. Grant funding is not available for Part 1 however is available for Part 2. Staff Recommendation Move to accept the WSB proposal to provide professional engineering services for the Wellhead Protection Plan Amendment Part 1. Attachments • WSB Proposal • Barr Proposal 1 Agenda Item #5C 28 July 2022 Mr. Steve Scherer Public Works Director 2052 County Road 24 Medina MN, 55340 Re: Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for the Wellhead Protection Plan Amendment Part 1 Dear Mr. Scherer, WSB is pleased to present this proposal to provide engineering services as they relate to the City’s Wellhead Protection Plan (WHPP) Amendment Part 1. The preparation of the City’s WHPP is a requirement of Minnesota Rules 4720.5100 to 5720.5590. Part 1 of the WHPP includes: Delineations of the Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA). Delineations of the Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). Well and aquifer vulnerability assessments. Associated reporting requirements. The goal of the Plan is to prevent human-caused contaminants from entering the water supply wells and to protect all who use the water supply from adverse health effects associated with groundwater contamination. A scoping meeting with the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) for the development of Part 1 of the WHPP was held on May 12, 2022. At that meeting the MDH introduced the contact persons and discussed requirements to complete the WHPP. The City has until April 18, 2023, to complete both Parts 1 and 2 of the WHPP. However, it is understood that an extension request will be prepared by WSB and submitted to MDH on the behalf of the City. Project Approach/Scope of Services To complete the WHPP Part 1, WSB has teamed with Barr Engineering (Barr) to satisfy the groundwater modeling requirements of the plan. Barr’s proposal is attached. WSB and Barr will be completing the following scope of services in cooperation: Coordinate with the MDH and other applicable agencies. Respond to information requests. Assemble data elements. Delineate the WHPA using MODFLOW Delineate Porous Media, WHPAs and DWSMA. Assess wellfield and DWSMA vulnerability. Prepare report. In addition, there are a number of project and public meetings that are required throughout the preparation of the WHPP. Three meetings have been included in our proposed fee. WSB and Barr will be present at the meetings and will prepare meeting information as necessary. WSB Steve Scherer 28 July 2022 Page 2 and Barr are available to attend additional meetings, if required. Additional meetings will be billed at our hourly rates. The City’s Tasks In order to complete our tasks, we will need The City to provide the following: 1. Provide a designated project contact person. 2. Provide answers to specific questions and provide requested information. Proposed Fee WSB proposes to complete the above scope of services on an hourly basis in accordance with our 2022 billing rate schedule for an estimated fee of $21,250. Barr’s fee is included in the proposed fee and will be passed through to the City with no mark-up. Schedule WSB and Barr can begin work immediately and estimate the work for Part 1 can be completed within the allowable time detailed by the MDH. Once Part 1 has been completed, we can provide you with a proposal to complete Part 2. Part 2 will need to be completed during 2023/2024 and WSB will coordinate the extension request with MDH. This letter represents our entire understanding of the project scope. All work under this letter proposal will be governed by the Professional Services Agreement entered into between the City of Medina and WSB on 13 December 2011. If the scope and fee appear to be appropriate, please sign on the space provided and return one copy to our office. We are available to begin work once we receive signed authorization. If you have any questions concerning the work plan or fee as discussed herein, please feel free to contact me at 612-360-3163. Sincerely, Ray Theiler, PE Project Manager WSB I hereby authorize WSB to proceed with the above-referenced work under the terms and conditions of the Professional Services Agreement entered into between City of Medina and WSB on 13 December 2011. By: _____________________________________ Name: ___________________________________ Date: ____________________________________ Barr Engineering Co. 4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com July 21, 2022 Ray Theiler, PE WSB 178 E. 9th Street Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55101 Re: Proposal for City of Medina Wellhead Protection Plan Amendment Services Dear Mr. Theiler: Per your request, this letter presents Barr Engineering’s proposed scope of work and cost estimate for preparing the Part 1 Wellhead Protection Plan amendment for the City of Medina (the City). Our project understanding, proposed scope of professional consulting services, and the assumptions upon which our cost estimate are based are presented in the remainder of proposal. Project Understanding The Medina water supply system includes nine primary wells and one emergency well. These wells pump from a total of four aquifers: an unconsolidated, artesian sand and gravel aquifer, the Jordan Sandstone aquifer, the Tunnel City-Wonewoc aquifer, and the Mt. Simon Sandstone aquifer. The City’s current wellhead protection plan (WHPP) was completed in 2013 (Part 1 of the plan was completed in 2010). Therefore, the City must update its wellhead protection plan (WHPP) due to the age of the current plan. In addition, a new well (unique number 814752) was added to the City’s water supply system in 2015. This new well must be incorporated into the new Part 1 WHPP. The City currently has four drinking water supply management areas (DWSMAs). The aquifer vulnerability is classified as low in all four of the City’s DWSMAs. The Part 1 WHPP amendment will include delineation of the wellhead protection areas (WHPAs) for each of the City’s non-emergency water supply wells and the corresponding DWSMAs according to the requirements of Minnesota Rules 4720.5100 through 4720.5590 (the Wellhead Protection Rules). Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) staff held a scoping meeting with City staff and you on May 12, 2022 to discuss the data elements that must be addressed in the Part 1 WHPP amendment. It is our understanding that, at the Scoping Meeting, MDH staff indicated a groundwater model based on Metro Model 3 (which was constructed by Barr Engineering) must be used to delineate the WHPAs for the Part 1 amendment rather than the groundwater model used to delineate the City’s current WHPAs, which pre- dates Metro Model 3. Ray Theiler, PE July 21, 2022 Page 2 G:\JCG\Medina\Medina Part 1 WHPP Amendment Proposal_07212022.docx Following the May 12 scoping meeting, MDH staff sent Scoping Decision Notice No. 1 (dated June 6, 2022) to the City. Scoping Decision Notice No. 1 documents the meeting and requirements for the Part 1 WHPP amendment. We reviewed Scoping Decision Notice No. 1 during preparation of this proposal. Please note that Minnesota Rules 4720.5300 requires a public water supplier to send a notice of their intent to amend their wellhead protection plan to local units of government whose jurisdictions may be wholly or partly within the water supplier’s DWSMA(s). We have assumed that the City has, or will, send this notification. We also understand that while a WHPP amendment completion date of April 18, 2023 is noted in Scoping Decision Notice No. 1, an extension request will be prepared by the City and submitted to the MDH. Proposed Scope of Work and Assumptions Our proposed scope of work for amending Part 1 of the City’s WHPP includes the following tasks: Task 1: Project Kickoff Meeting Our first task will be to hold a project kick off meeting with City staff and you. At this meeting, data reports, and other information needed from the City to complete the Part 1 WHPP amendment will be identified. We have assumed that the kickoff meeting will be held virtually via Teams or similar platform and that it will last one hour. Task 2: Data Compilation and Pre-Delineation Meeting Barr will prepare for and participate in the Pre-Delineation Meeting with MDH staff. Meeting preparation will include: • Compilation of available hydrogeologic information for the area around Medina. • Review of the existing Medina Wellhead Protection groundwater model. • Preparation of the conceptual hydrogeologic model. • Preparation of the required Determination of Aquifer Properties and Aquifer Test Plan (DAP-ATP) Forms for the aquifers from which the Medina water supply wells pump. • Development of the proposed pumping rates to be used in the WHPA delineations. • Identification of modifications to Metro Model 3 in the vicinity of Medina to be discussed with MDH staff at the Pre-Delineation Meeting. The purpose of the Pre-Delineation Meeting is to present the conceptual hydrogeologic model on which the WHPA delineations will be based to the MDH hydrologist and discuss the approach that will be taken for the WHPA delineation. In this case, the approach to be taken will include modification of Metro Model 3 in the vicinity of Medina. Ray Theiler, PE July 21, 2022 Page 3 G:\JCG\Medina\Medina Part 1 WHPP Amendment Proposal_07212022.docx Assumptions • The Pre-Delineation Meeting will last no more than two hours and will be held virtually via Teams or similar platform. You and City staff are welcome to attend this virtual meeting. • The City will provide to Barr Engineering projected 2027 total pumping estimates for each well or projections for other years that can be used to determine projected 2027 total well pumping. • The City or MDH will provide Barr Engineering a copy of the groundwater model files for the model used to delineate the current Medina WHPAs. • The City will provide to Barr Engineering a copy of the 2010 Medina Part 1 WHPP. • The 2010 Medina Part 1 WHPP includes documentation of previously conducted pumping tests. It is also assumed that the City has pumping information from the new well and that the documentation of previously conducted pumping tests and pumping information from the new well can be used as the basis for preparing the required DAP-ATP Forms. Furthermore, it is assumed that the MDH will not require data from any other aquifer tests be used or submitted in the Department’s specified spreadsheet format. We have also assumed that copies of the DAP- ATP forms prepared for the 2010 Part 1 WHPP will be provided to Barr Engineering by others and the MDH will not require any new pumping tests be performed to support the Part 1 WHPP amendment. • MDH requires at least two geologic cross sections through the DWSMAs to support the conceptual hydrogeologic model and aquifer vulnerability assessments. We have assumed that geologic cross sections were prepared for the 2010 Medina Part 1 WHPP and that these cross sections can be used without modification in the Part 1 WHPP amendment. • The City has reviewed the well locations shown on the figures included in Scoping Decision Notice No. 1 and provided to the MDH correct coordinates for any well whose location shown on the figures is not accurate. Furthermore, the City or MDH will provide to Barr Engineering coordinates for all the Medina water supply wells. Task 3: WHPA Delineation To comply with the MDH model requirement presented at Scoping Meeting No. 1 and passed along to us, we propose to modify Metro Model 3 in the vicinity of Medina based on available hydrogeologic information. This modified groundwater model will then be used to perform the porous media delineation of the emergency response zone and WHPA for each of the City’s non-emergency water supply wells. The porous media delineations will be basis for the emergency response zone and WHPA for each of the City’s non-emergency water supply wells. Assumptions • Barr will refine the groundwater model grid around the Medina wells as needed. • It will not be necessary to add additional hydraulic boundaries to the groundwater model. Ray Theiler, PE July 21, 2022 Page 4 G:\JCG\Medina\Medina Part 1 WHPP Amendment Proposal_07212022.docx • It will not be necessary to revise the layer thicknesses in the groundwater model. • It will not be necessary to modify the boundaries of hydraulic conductivity zones in the groundwater model in the vicinity of Medina. • Per MDH requirements, Barr will update pumping rates for the Medina municipal wells in the groundwater model, as necessary to accommodate projected 2027 pumping. We have assumed that the MDH will not require updating pumping rates in the groundwater model for non-Medina high-capacity wells in the vicinity of Medina from the rates currently in Metro Model 3. • The updated groundwater model will be used for the delineation of 1-year and 10-year groundwater time of travel zones around each of the Medina non-emergency water supply wells (this is referred to as the porous media delineation). • A comparison of available groundwater elevation measurements in the vicinity of Medina with heads generated by the updated groundwater model will agree sufficiently and the MDH will not require recalibration of the updated model. • In keeping with current MDH protocols, the updated groundwater model files will be provided to the MDH for review prior to the porous media delineation of the groundwater travel time zones. • Based on our experience with developing Part 1 WHPPs and in keeping with typical MDH requirements, a model sensitivity analysis will be performed. • The MDH will not require a fracture flow evaluation for any of the Medina wells. • The porous media 10-year time of travel zones around the Medina wells will be used for the WHPA delineations. • Aquifer vulnerability is classified as low in the current Medina DWSMAs. Per current MDH policy, we have assumed that a conjunctive delineation (a.k.a., surface water catchment area delineation) will not be required. Task 4: DWSMA Delineation Following delineation of the WHPAs for the Medina wells, Barr Engineering will delineate the DWSMAs. Note that since the number of wells and pumping rates for the City’s wells will likely not be exactly the same as for the delineation of the current DWSMAs, the new DWSMAs may encompass larger or smaller areas. The Wellhead Protection Rules require that DWSMAs completely contain WHPAs and that DWSMAs be defined using identifiable geographic boundaries (e.g., property parcels boundaries, roads, municipal boundaries, etc.). Assumptions • The DWSMA will be delineated using property parcel boundaries, roads, and quarter-quarter section boundaries to the extent possible with GIS methods utilizing data readily available in our current GIS system and databases. Ray Theiler, PE July 21, 2022 Page 5 G:\JCG\Medina\Medina Part 1 WHPP Amendment Proposal_07212022.docx Task 5: Well and Aquifer Vulnerability Assessments Barr Engineering will complete well and aquifer vulnerability assessments as required by the Wellhead Protection Rules. Assumptions • The MDH will provide copies of their well vulnerability scoring sheets for the Medina wells. • The MDH well vulnerability scoring sheets for the Medina wells will not require revisions. • Aquifer vulnerability will be assessed for the DWSMAs using existing and publicly available geologic information such as well logs stored in the Minnesota County Well Index and available water quality information (including the MDH’s source water assessment data for the Medina wells) for the source water aquifers in Medina. The aquifer vulnerability classification in the existing Medina DWSMAs will be reviewed and any changes to the current aquifer vulnerability classification will be identified in the report. Task 6: Report and Project Management After completing the vulnerability assessments, Barr will prepare a draft report to satisfy the MDH reporting requirements for Part 1 of the WHPP. The draft report will be provided to the City in PDF format for review. Following City review of the draft report, we will make any necessary revisions to address comments from the City and submit the draft report, along with the associated groundwater model files and GIS files, electronically to the MDH for preliminary review. Upon receipt of any comments from the MDH, we will prepare the final report. Professional geologist certification of the final report will be provided by John Greer of Barr Engineering. The final report, along with associated model and GIS files, must be submitted to the MDH for final review and approval. Based on our recent experience, the MDH will accept submittal of the report and supporting information electronically via download link. An electronic copy of the final report (in PDF format) and the associated GIS files will be provided to the City. Paper copies of the final report can be prepared for the City at an additional cost. This task will also include routine project management tasks. Assumptions • Barr will submit the final report to the MDH for approval on behalf of the City of Medina unless directed otherwise. If the City prefers to submit the final report, Barr will provide the City with a draft submittal letter and a CD or flash drive containing the report, model files, and GIS files to be submitted to the MDH. • Only commonly received, minor revisions will be requested by the MDH. If significant revisions are requested additional budget may be needed. This can occur if a new MDH staff member is assigned to the project or if changes in rules or policies occur during preparation of the plan. • Project progress will be communicated via routine project communications and our invoices. Ray Theiler, PE July 21, 2022 Page 6 G:\JCG\Medina\Medina Part 1 WHPP Amendment Proposal_07212022.docx Task 7: Public Information Meeting After the Part 1 WHPP amendment is approved by the MDH, the Wellhead Protection Rules require that the results of Part 1 of the WHPP be presented at a public information meeting. We have assumed that John Greer of Barr Engineering will make the presentation at the public information meeting. If the City prefers to make the presentation Barr Engineering can provide PowerPoint slides for the City’s use at the meeting. Proposed Project Schedule We propose to complete our work on the Part 1 WHPP amendment, except for the public information meeting presentation, within 120 days of notice to proceed, not counting MDH or City review periods. Cost Estimate Our budgetary cost estimate to complete the work described above is $18,150. For the services provided, we would bill you on time and materials basis on our standard four-week billing cycle. A breakdown of our estimated costs by task is presented in the table below. If changed conditions result in work being required that we assumed would not be necessary, we would provide you with a cost for the additional work and would not proceed with the additional work until we receive your approval to do so. Part 1 Wellhead Protection Plan Amendment Cost Estimate City of Medina Task Description Task Total 1 Project Kickoff Meeting $250 2 Data Compilation and Pre-Delineation Meeting $4,000 3 WHPA Delineation $4,550 4 DWSMA Delineation $600 5 Well and Aquifer Vulnerability Assessments $1,250 6 Report and Project Management $6,650 7 Public Information Meeting $850 TOTAL $18,150 Note: Cost estimate is based on Barr Engineering’s 2022 billing rates. If work extends into 2023 and Barr Engineering’s billing rates increase in 2023, Barr Engineering reserves the right to adjust the cost estimate for work not yet billed to be consistent with 2023 billing rates. Project Staffing This project will be led by senior professionals from our Minnesota offices. Our team includes members skilled at hydrogeology, groundwater modeling, water supply planning, and wellhead protection plan preparation. We bring all the experience needed to ensure project success. Contract Terms Ray Theiler, PE July 21, 2022 Page 7 G:\JCG\Medina\Medina Part 1 WHPP Amendment Proposal_07212022.docx The scope of professional consulting services we will provide for preparing the amendment of Part 1 of the Medina WHPP is described above. If our proposed scope of services is acceptable to you, we would propose to perform the work under our Standard Terms (attached) that would set forth the Agreement between the City of Medina and Barr for preparation of the Medina Part 1 Wellhead Protection Plan amendment. The Agreement would be effective for the duration of the services unless earlier terminated by either you or us. We would commence work upon receipt of a copy of this letter signed by the City of Medina. The estimated schedule for the services is presented above. We would inform you of our progress by periodic emails, telephone calls, and our invoices. We understand that you would be the City’s point-of-contact. We would direct communications to you at the address on this letter, or via email to you at RTheiler@wsbeng.com. Direction would be provided to John Greer at the letterhead address or via email at jgreer@barr.com. Thank you for the opportunity to provide you this proposal. If you have any questions regarding our proposal, please feel free contact me (612-669-6797 or blemon@barr.com) or John Greer (952-832-2691 or jgreer@barr.com), the project manager who will work with you on this project. Sincerely yours, Barr Engineering Co. By Its Vice President Accepted this day of , 2022 By Its ____________________________________ Attachments Standard Terms—Professional Services Barr Engineering Co. Page 1 of 2 Ver. 12/13/2018 Last reviewed: 12/13/2018 STANDARD TERMS—PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Our Agreement with you consists of the accompanying letter or other authorization, Work Orders, and these Standard Terms – Professional Services. Section 1: Our Responsibilities 1.1 We will provide the professional services (“Services”) described in this Agreement. We will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of our profession practicing in the same locality. 1.2 We will select the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures used in providing our Services. If you direct us to deviate from our selections, you agree to hold us harmless from claims, damages, and expenses arising out of your direction. 1.3 We will acquire all licenses applicable to our Services and we will comply with applicable law. 1.4 Our duties do not include supervising your contractors or commenting on, supervising, or providing the means and methods of their work unless we accept any such duty in writing. We will not be responsible for the failure of your contractors to perform in accordance with their undertakings. 1.5 We will provide a health and safety program for our employees, but we will not be responsible for contractor, job, or site health or safety unless we accept that duty in writing. 1.6 Estimates of our fees or other project costs will be based on information available to us and on our experience and knowledge. Such estimates are an exercise of our professional judgment and are not guaranteed or warranted. Actual costs may vary. You should add a contingency. 1.7 The information you provide to us will be maintained in confidence except as required by law. Section 2: Your Responsibilities 2.1 You will provide access to property. 2.2 You will provide us with prior reports, specifications, plans, changes in plans, and other information about the project that may affect the delivery of our Services. You will hold us harmless from claims, damages, and related expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, involving information not timely called to our attention or not correctly shown on documents you furnish to us. 2.3 You agree to provide us with information on contamination and dangerous and hazardous substances and processes we may encounter in performing the Services and related emergency procedure information. 2.4 You agree to hold us harmless as to claims that we are an owner, operator, generator, transporter, treater, storer, or a disposal facility within the meaning of any law governing the handling, treatment, storage, or disposal of dangerous or hazardous materials. 2.5 Site remediation services may involve risk of contamination of previously uncontaminated air, soil, or water. If you are requesting that we provide services that include this risk, you agree to hold us harmless from such contamination claims, damages, and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, unless and to the extent the loss is caused by our negligence. 2.6 You agree to make disclosures required by law. If we are required by law or legal process to make such disclosures, you agree to hold us harmless and indemnify us from related claims and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. Section 3: Reports and Records 3.1 We will retain analytical data relating to the Services for seven years and financial data for three years. 3.2 Monitoring wells are your property and you are responsible for their permitting, maintenance and abandonment unless we accept that duty in writing. Samples remaining after tests are conducted and field and laboratory equipment that cannot be adequately cleansed of contaminants are your property. They will be discarded or returned to you, at our discretion, unless within 15 days of the report date you give written direction to store or transfer the materials at your expense. 3.3 Our reports, notes, calculations, and other documents, and our computer software, programs, models, and data are instruments of our Services, and they remain our property, subject to a license to you for your use in the related project for the purposes disclosed to us. You may not use or transfer such information and documents to others for a purpose for which they were not prepared without our written approval. You agree to indemnify and hold us harmless from claims, damages, and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of any unauthorized transfer or use. 3.4 Because electronic documents may be modified intentionally or inadvertently, you agree that we will not be liable for damages resulting from change in an electronic document occurring after we transmit it to you. In case of any difference or ambiguity between an electronic and a paper document, the paper document shall govern. When accepting document transfer in electronic media format, you accept exclusive risk relating to long-term capability, usability, and readability of documents, software application packages, operating systems, and computer hardware. 3.5 If you do not pay for the Services in full as agreed, we may retain reports and work not yet delivered to you and you agree to return to us our reports and other work in your possession or under your control. You agree not to use or rely upon our work for any purpose until it is paid for in full. Barr Engineering Co. Page 2 of 2 Ver. 12/13/2018 Last reviewed: 12/13/2018 Section 4: Compensation 4.1 You will pay for the Services as agreed or according to our then current fee schedules if there is no other written agreement as to price. An estimated cost is not a firm figure unless stated as such and you should allow for a contingency in addition to estimated costs. 4.2 You agree to notify us of billing disputes within 15 days and to pay undisputed portions of invoices within 30 days of invoice date. For balances not paid under these terms, you agree to pay interest on unpaid balances beginning 10 days after invoice date at the rate of 1.5% per month, but not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law. 4.3 If you direct us to invoice another, we will do so, but you agree to be responsible for our compensation unless you provide us with that person's written acceptance of the terms of our Agreement and we agree to extend credit to that person. 4.4 You agree to compensate us in accordance with our fee schedule if we are asked or required to respond to legal process arising out of a proceeding to which we are not a party. 4.5 If we are delayed by factors beyond our control, or if the project conditions or the scope of work change, or if the standards change, we will receive an equitable adjustment of our compensation. 4.6 In consideration of our providing insurance to cover claims made by you, you hereby waive any right of offset as to payment otherwise due us. Section 5: Disputes, Damage, and Risk Allocation 5.1 Each of us will exercise good faith efforts to resolve disputes without litigation. Such efforts will include a meeting attended by each party’s representative empowered to resolve the dispute. Disputes (except collections) will be submitted to mediation as a condition precedent to litigation. 5.2 We will not be liable for special, incidental, consequential, or punitive damages, including but not limited to those arising from delay, loss of use, loss of profits or revenue, loss of financing commitments or fees, or the cost of capital. Each of us waives against the other and its subcontractors, agents, and employees all rights to recover for losses covered by our respective property/casualty or auto insurance policies. 5.3 We will not be liable for damages unless you have notified us of your claim within 30 days of the date of your discovery of it and unless you have given us an opportunity to investigate and to recommend ways of mitigating damages, and unless suit is commenced within two years of the earlier of the date of injury or loss and the date of completion of the Services. 5.4 For you to obtain the benefit of a fee which includes a reasonable allowance for risks, you agree that our aggregate liability will not exceed the fee paid for our services, but not less than $50,000, and you agree to indemnify us from all liability to others in excess of that amount. If you are unwilling to accept this allocation of risk, we will increase our aggregate liability to $100,000 provided that, within 10 days of the date of our Agreement, you provide payment in an amount that will increase our fees by 10%, but not less than $500, to compensate us for the greater risk undertaken. This increased fee is not the purchase of insurance. 5.5 If you fail to pay us within 60 days following invoice date, we may consider the default a total breach of our Agreement and, at our option, we may terminate all of our duties without liability to you or to others. 5.6 If we are involved in legal action to collect our compensation, you agree to pay our collection expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. 5.7 The law of the state in which the project site is located will govern all disputes. Each of us waives trial by jury. No employee acting within the scope of employment will have any individual liability for his or her acts or omissions and you agree not to make any claim against individual employees. Section 6: Miscellaneous Provisions 6.1 We will provide a certificate of insurance to you upon request. Any claim as an Additional Insured will be limited to losses caused by our sole negligence. 6.2 This Agreement is our entire agreement, and it supersedes prior agreements. Only a writing signed by an authorized representative for each of us making specific reference to the provision modified may modify it. 6.3 Neither of us will assign this Agreement without the written approval of the other. No other person has any rights under this Agreement. 6.4 Only a writing may terminate this Agreement. We will receive an equitable adjustment of our compensation as well as our earned fees and expenses if our work is terminated prior to completion. 6.5 We will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, ancestry, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status, affectional preference, disability, status with regard to public assistance, membership or activity in a local human-rights commission, or status as a specially disabled, Vietnam-era, or other eligible veteran. We will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are considered, and employees are treated during their employment, without regard to those factors. Our actions will include, but are not limited to notifications, hiring, promotion or employment upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoffs or terminations, rates of pay and other forms of compensation, and selection for training or apprenticeship. 6.6 Neither we nor you, including our officers, employees, and agents, are agents of the other, except as agreed in writing. Except as agreed in writing, nothing in this Agreement creates in either party any right or authority to incur any obligations on behalf of, or to bind in any respect, the other party. Nothing contained herein will prevent either party from procuring or providing the same or similar products or services from or to any third person, provided that there is no breach of any obligations pertaining to confidentiality. End of Standard Terms 1 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: August 10, 2022 MEETING: August 16, 2022 SUBJECT: Chippewa Road Watermain Extension History The City of Medina has been working to close the gap on the secondary line leading to the water tower on Willow Drive for several years. The wells are located on the east end of town (where the water source is the best) and brought to the treatment plant for treatment. From the treatment plant we have relied on a single watermain along Hwy 55 for our trunk connection to the water tower for storage. As development has occurred, we have worked our way west with a secondary line to the western property line of Polaris, so we have redundancy to the system. With more development being proposed further west on Chippewa Road it is likely we will achieve our goal of Willow Drive in the next few years. Summary The City of Medina’s CIP plan for 2022 includes the segment of watermain from the western border of Polaris to the entrance of Okalee along Chippawa Road. The segment is approximately 1000 ft and will be primarily directionally drilled with the connection being open cut on each end. The city solicited quotes for installation of the watermain and two bids were received: Burschville Construction, Inc bid $137,565.00 and E. J. Mayers, Inc. bid $150,211.75. The City of Medina proposes to purchase and supply the pipe and pipe materials for the project from Core and Main and utilize Burschville Construction, Inc. to install the pipe. The city still plans to use WSB for inspections of the installation. Staff Recommendation Move to award the watermain agreement, and installation with Burschville Construction, Inc. and purchase the pipe as quoted from Core and Main. Attachments • Chippewa Road Watermain Extension Construction Agreement • Core and Main Material Bid MEMORANDUM Agenda Item #5D CHIPPEWA ROAD WATERMAIN EXTENSION INSTALLATION AGREEMENT This Agreement is made this 16th day of August 2022, by and between Burschville Construction Inc., 11440 8th Street NE, Hanover, MN 55341, a Minnesota corporation (the “Contractor”) and the City of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”). Recitals 1. The City has been authorized to enter into a contract for the watermain extension installation; and 2. The City has approved the contract for the watermain extension installation with the Contractor; and 3. The parties wish to define the scope of services and terms of their agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Contractor agree as follows: Terms 1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES. The Contractor will perform the Chippewa Road Watermain Extension installation for the City. “Watermain Extension” will consist of labor and equipment to construct, install, and test the City supplied materials on Chippewa Road, in accordance with the attached Exhibit A. The “City provided materials” are in accordance with the attached Exhibit B. 2.0. TERM. The term of this contract will be from August 2022 to December 2022. 3.0 COMPENSATION. The City shall compensate the Contractor $137,565 for approximately 1000 feet of watermain extension installation along Chippewa Road in accordance with the attached Exhibit A, and as defined in the Scope of Services above and approved by the Public Works Director. Any work performed will be at the discretion of the Public Works Director, in accordance with the Scope of Services above, and attached Exhibit A and Exhibit B. 3.01 The City shall pay for the watermain extension permit through the MDH. The Contractor shall pay for all other licenses and permits. The contractor costs shall be included in the bid cost in accordance with the attached Exhibit A. 4.0 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. 4.01 Both the Contractor and the City acknowledge and agree that the Contractor is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. Any employee or subcontractor who may perform services for the Contractor in connection with this Agreement is also not an employee of the City. The Contractor understands that the City will not provide any benefits of any type in connection with this Agreement, including but not limited to health or medical insurance, worker’s compensation insurance and unemployment insurance, nor will the City withhold any state or federal taxes, including income or payroll taxes, which may be payable by the Contractor. 4.02 The Contractor will supply and use its own equipment, tools, and materials to complete the services under this Agreement. 4.03 The Contractor acknowledges that any general instruction it receives from the City has no effect on its status as an independent contractor. 5.0 INSURANCE. The Contractor will maintain adequate insurance to protect itself and the City from claims and liability for injury or damage to persons or property for all work performed by the Contractor and its respective employees or agents under this Agreement. The Contractor shall name the City as an additional insured under its general liability policy in limits acceptable to the City. Prior to performing any services under this Agreement, the Contractor shall provide evidence to the City that acceptable insurance coverage is effective. 6.0 WORKER’S COMPENSATION. 6.01 The Contractor will comply with the provisions of the Minnesota worker’s compensation statute as an independent contractor before commencing work under this Agreement. 6.02 The Contractor will provide its own worker’s compensation insurance and will provide evidence to the City of such coverage before commencing work under this Agreement. 7.0 INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor will hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including defense, settlement, and reasonable attorney’s fees) for claims as a result of bodily injury, loss of life, property damages and any other damages arising out of the Contractor’s performance under this Agreement. 8.0 PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE BOND. The Contractor may provide a Payment and Performance Bond to the City at no additional cost to the City. 9.0 PRIVATIZATION CLAUSE. Contractor agrees to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (the “Act”) and all other applicable state and federal laws relating to data privacy or confidentiality. All data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained or disseminated by the Contractor in performing its obligations is subject to the requirements of the Act, and the Contractor must comply with the requirements of the Act as if the Contractor was a government entity. 10.0 APPLICABLE LAW. The execution, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement will, in all respects, be controlled and governed by the laws of Minnesota. 11.0 ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor may not assign this Agreement or procure the services of another individual or company to provide services under this Agreement without first obtaining the express written consent of the City. 12.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT; AMENDMENTS. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties, and no other agreement prior to or contemporaneous with this Agreement shall be effective, except as expressly set forth or incorporated herein. Any purported amendment to this Agreement is not effective unless it is in writing and executed by both parties. 13.0 NO WAIVER BY CITY. By entering into this Agreement, the City does not waive its entitlement to any immunity under statute or common law. 14.0 TERMINATION. Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time, for any reason. If the contract is terminated early, the City will pay a prorated fee for the services performed to date in that calendar year. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year written above. CITY OF MEDINA By __________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor By __________________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk Burschville Construction, Inc (CONTRACTOR) By ____________________________ James Schendel, President 2575 2236 2230 2212 2120 4555 2100224243802382 2402 K: \ 0 1 7 5 7 1 - 0 0 0 \ C a d \ P l a n \ 0 1 7 5 7 1 - 0 0 0 - C - T I T L . d w g 5/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 2 1 : 0 5 : 3 7 P M CHIPPEWA ROAD WATERMAIN EXTENSION PROJECT CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR LOCATED ON CHIPPEWA ROAD FROM 1+65 TO 11+40 PROJECT LOCATION MAP F G EXISTING PLAN SYMBOLS PROPERTY LINES/RIGHT-OF-WAY UTILITY EASEMENT TREE LINE SIGN DECIDUOUS TREE SHRUB CONIFEROUS TREE EXISTING UTILITY SYMBOLS FIBER OPTIC LINE GAS LINE COMMUNICATIONS PEDESTAL POWER POLE ELECTRIC BOX CATCH BASIN STORM APRON CCOMMUNICATION LINE EELECTRIC POWER LINE ||WATER MAIN > >> SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER GATE VALVE HYDRANT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM SEWER MANHOLE COUNTY:HENNEPIN SECT 3, TWP 118, RNG 23 PROJECT LOCATION THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." GOPHER ONE CALL TICKET NUMBER: 210882287 UTILITY COORDINATION MEETING HELD ON: XXXXXXXXXXXX APPROVED BYSHEET NO.DATE PLAN REVISIONS ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS AND ORDINANCES WILL BE COMPLIED WITH IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. LICENSE NUMBER:DATE:5/24/2022 45782 JAMES L. STREMEL, P.E. SHEET 5 OF WSB PROJ. NO. 017571-000 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION CHIPPEWA ROAD STA 1+65 END CONSTRUCTION CHIPPEWA ROAD STA 11+40 1 THIS PLAN SET HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR: CITY OF MEDINA 2052 COUNTY ROAD 24 MEDINA, MN 55340 763-473-4643 A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (651-454-0002) IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION. EXCAVATION NOTICE SYSTEM PLAN SET INDEX GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS UTILITY INFORMATION THE 2020 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" SHALL GOVERN. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, INCLUDING THE LATEST FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS. WATERMAIN AND SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2018 CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS. E ST S N SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 240 480 THIS PLAN SET CONTAINS 5 SHEETS Sheet List Table SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET1 2 3 4-5 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMO PLANS WATERMAIN PLAN HWY 5 5 MO H A W K D R I V E WI L L O W D R I V E CHIPPEWA ROAD PLATE NO. LAST REVISION: FEB. 2019GATE VALVE AND BOX INSTALLATION WAT-02 EXTENSIONS ARE REQUIRED ON ON ALL GATE VALVES. ADJUST TOP TO 1/2" BELOW GRADE. BOX TO BE SET TO PROVIDE 12" OF ADJUSTMENT. 7.5' MINIMUM COVER REQUIRED OVER TOP OF WATER MAIN.DROP LID TYLER MUELLER BIBBY-STE-CROIX NO. 6860 NO. H-10361 NO. B-5160 TOP TYLER MUELLER BIBBY-STE-CROIX NO. 6860 NO. H-10361 NO. VB502 GRADE 26" 26" 27" EXTENSION TYLER MUELLER BIBBY-STE-CROIX VB520 VB521 VB522 VB523 NO. 58 NO. 59 NO. 60 NO. 58 NO. 59 14" 18" 24" 14" 20" NO. 57 NO. 58 NO. 59 NO. 60 9" 14" 20" 26" BOTTOM TYLER MUELLER BIBBY-STE-CROIX NO. 6860 NO. H-10361 NO. VB516 65" 65" 60" COPPER TRACER WIRE INSTALLED WITH ALL PVC WATER MAIN BASE NOTE: 1. ALL WATERMAIN BOLTS ARE TO BE CORE-BLUE, STAINLESS STEEL, OR AN APPROVED EQUAL 2. TRACER WIRE INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LATEST EDITION OF MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION STANDARDS. 8" CONCRETE BLOCK MEGALUGS(TYP) RESILIANT WEDGE VALVE CONFORMING TO AWWA C-509-80 STANDARDS ALL VALVE BOX COMPONENTS SHALL BE MANUFACTURED IN THE U.S. OR CANADA, OR AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. TYLER NO. 6860 MUELLER NO. H-10357 BIBBY-STE-CROIX B-5001 GATE VALVE BOX, SCREW TYPE, 3 PIECE, 5 1/4" SHAFT, SIZE G BOX, 7'-6" EXTENDED, #6 ROUND BASE EXTENSIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 1-2' OF FINISHED GRADE. 1- 2 ' GATE VALVE ADAPTOR. GATE VALVE ADAPTOR ESS BROS., OR APPROVED EQUAL. OVERLAP LONGITUDINAL JOINTS MINIMUM OF 6" OVERLAP END JOINTS MINIMUM OF 6" AND STAPLE OVERLAP AT 1.5' INTERVALS. ANCHOR TRENCH (SEE DETAIL AND NOTES BELOW) STAPLE PATTERN/DENSITY SHALL FOLLOW MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS OR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3 U-SHAPED 8", 11 GAUGE METAL STAPLES PER SQUARE YARD (THIS MAY VARY AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY) ANCHOR TRENCH 1. DIG 6" X 6" TRENCH 2. LAY BLANKET IN TRENCH 3. STAPLE AT 1.5' INTERVALS 4. BACKFILL WITH NATURAL SOIL AND COMPACT 5. BLANKET LENGTH SHALL NOT EXCEED 100' WITHOUT AN ANCHOR TRENCH 6" 6" 1' TO 3' DI R E C T I O N O F SU R F A C E F L O W PLATE NO. LAST REVISION: EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INSTALLATION ERO-22 FEB 2019 NOTE: SLOPE SURFACE SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS, SOIL CLUMPS, STICKS, VEHICLE IMPRINTS, AND GRASS. BLANKETS SHALL HAVE GOOD SOIL CONTACT. PLATE NO. LAST REVISION: JAN 2016DITCH CHECK SPACING FOR ROCK/BIO DAM ERO-15 6" X 6" TRENCH WITH LEADING EDGE OF TYPE IV GEOTEXTILE FABRIC STAPLED AT 1' INTERVALS AND BACKFILLED WITH NATURAL SOIL POINT 2 POINT 1 FL O W FL O W DITCH CHECK ROCK/BIO WEEPER OR CHECK DAM (SEE ERO-12 AND 13) 6" 11 GAUGE METAL STAPLES SPACED 2' O.C. NOTE: POINT 1 MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 6" HIGHER THAN POINT 2 TO ENSURE THAT WATER FLOWS OVER THE DITCH CHECK AND NOT AROUND THE ENDS. DITCH GRADE (%) 2 4 6 8 10 10+ INTERVAL (FT) 100 75 50 40 25 25 DITCH CHECK SPACING (USE FOR DETAILS ER0-12, 13, 14) MNDOT 3733 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 14" - CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE SUBGRADE STABILIZATION FABRIC - 8 OZ./SY NON-WOVEN (MNDOT 3733, TYPE V) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PATCH INSET A * 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT REQUIRED BETWEEN ALL BITUMINOUS LAYERS 4" - TYPE 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,B) SPNWB330B BASE COURSE* 1.5" - TYPE 12.5 WEAR COURSE MIX (3,B) (SPWEA340B)* SUBGRADE PREPARATION COMPACTED BACKFILL GRANULAR BORROW MNDOT SPEC. 3149B "Bc" DENOTES OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE Bc+12" MIN. Bc 12" 6" PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN GOOD SOILS COMPACTED BACKFILL COURSE FILTER AGGR. MNDOT SPEC. 3149H FOUNDATION "Bc" DENOTES OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPEBc+12" MIN. 12" 6" 6" PAY DEPTH INCREMENTS (TYP.) Bc PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN POOR SOILS PLATE NO. LAST REVISION: FOUNDATION AND PIPE BEDDING FOR PVC BED-01 JAN 2016 0.5Bc 0.5Bc NOTE: 1. FOR POLYPROPYLENE PIPE, SEE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDED PIPE BEDDING SECTION. SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: SHEET OF WSB PROJECT NO. I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , OR R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y DI R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A D U L Y LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E LA W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . LI C . N O : DA T E : RE V I S I O N S NO . DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N CH I P P E W A R O A D W A T E R M A I N E X T E N S I O N ME D I N A , M I N N E S O T A 017571-000 JA M E S L . S T R E M E L , P . E . 45 7 8 2 5/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 2 5 AKM JLSBB MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS 2 AS SHOWN LUNSKI DEVELOPMENT MEDINA LLC BRENDAN LARSON AND WHITNEY NICOLE LARSON 2212 4412 JKP LLC 20"8" MB TNH ELEV: 1001.94 MBMBMB >> >> > > > > > S > | | | | 2230 4380 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E CLEARING AND GRUBBING THE LAWRENCE L PRIBYL TRUST ARTHUR AND MARLENE SCHERBER POLARIS INDUSTRIES INC 2212 2100 4412 JKP LLC TNH ELEV: 1000.51 MB 12" 12"12" |||||||||| 2212 2120 2242 C C C C C C C C C CEEEEEEEEEE SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: SHEET OF WSB PROJECT NO. I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , OR R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y DI R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A D U L Y LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E LA W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . LI C . N O : DA T E : RE V I S I O N S NO . DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N CH I P P E W A R O A D W A T E R M A I N E X T E N S I O N ME D I N A , M I N N E S O T A 017571-000 JA M E S L . S T R E M E L , P . E . 45 7 8 2 5/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 2 5 AKM JLSBB N SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 30 60 EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN 3 AS SHOWN REMOVE AND REPLACE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ONLY AS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE WATERMAIN INSTALLATION. (ASSUMED NONE IS REQUIRED, BUT TOKEN QUANTITIES HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT) CHIPPEWA ROAD MA T C H L I N E S T A - 8 + 0 0 SE E B E L O W MA T C H L I N E S T A - 8 + 0 0 SE E B E L O W PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND DRIVE WAY REMOVE AND REPLACE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ONLY AS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE WATERMAIN INSTALLATION. ( ASSUMED NONE IS REQUIRED, BUT TOKEN QUANTITIES HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT) LEGEND EXISTING HYDRANT MB MBMBMB S > > > > > > | | 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 12" PVC 8" PVC 24" CL III RCP EX SMH 100 LUNSKI DEVELOPMENT MEDINA LLC BRENDAN LARSON AND WHITNEY NICOLE LARSON 2212 4412 JKP LLC C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E >> >> | | 10.42' 22' 15" CMP |24" FES 24" FES 2 4 " C L I I I R C P @ 1 . 0 2 % I.E. = 993.29 I.E. = 993.67 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 1020 1025 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 1020 1025 0+00 0+50 1+00 99 8 . 1 6 1+50 99 9 . 7 5 2+00 99 8 . 5 6 2+50 99 9 . 1 5 3+00 99 9 . 8 2 3+50 10 0 0 . 4 0 4+00 10 0 0 . 6 8 4+50 10 0 0 . 6 3 5+00 10 0 0 . 7 9 5+50 10 0 0 . 8 4 6+00 10 0 0 . 1 0 6+50 99 9 . 6 4 7+00 99 9 . 7 7 7+50 10 0 0 . 9 0 8+00 10 0 2 . 1 2 12" PVC WATERMAIN C900 - DR 11 (DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED) EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION ABOVE WATERMAIN EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION ABOVE WATERMAIN 7.5' MIN. COVER 15" CMP I.E. 993.29' K: \ 0 1 7 5 7 1 - 0 0 0 \ C a d \ P l a n \ 0 1 7 5 7 1 - 0 0 0 - W A T R - P L A N . d w g 5/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 2 1 : 0 6 : 1 5 P M WATERMAIN PLAN 4 AS SHOWN SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: SHEET OF WSB PROJECT NO. I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , OR R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y DI R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A D U L Y LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E LA W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . LI C . N O : DA T E : RE V I S I O N S NO . DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N CH I P P E W A R O A D W A T E R M A I N E X T E N S I O N ME D I N A , M I N N E S O T A 017571-000 JA M E S L . S T R E M E L , P . E . 45 7 8 2 5/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 2 5 AKM JLSBB CH I P P E W A C O U R T SE E S H E E T MA T C H L I N E S T A : 8+ 0 0 5 BEGIN DIRECTIONAL DRILL - 12" WATERMAIN STA. 2+00 22.5° BEND CHIPPEWA ROAD N SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 OVERDEPTH WATERMAIN TO AVOID HIGH POINT, INCIDENTAL BEGIN 12" WATERMAIN STA. 1+65 CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" WATERMAIN 22.5° BEND 12" GATE VALVE EXISTING 8" GATE VALVE LEGEND BIOROLL - INSTALL PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE RESTORE WITHIN 7-DAYS OF WORK WITH MNDOT SEED MIX 35-241 @ 36.5 LB/AC & TYPE 2 FERTILIZER @ 200 LB/AC & EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (ROLLED EROSION CONTROL CATEGORY 35) MB |||||||||| 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00|||||||||||||||| 12" PVC 12" PVC THE LAWRENCE L PRIBYL TRUST 2212 4412 JKP LLC C C C C C C C C C CEEEEEEEEEE 5' 8.89' 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 1020 1025 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 1020 1025 8+00 10 0 2 . 1 2 8+50 10 0 3 . 1 4 9+00 10 0 2 . 8 6 9+50 10 0 1 . 1 1 10+00 99 9 . 8 8 10+50 99 8 . 3 2 11+00 99 7 . 4 8 11+50 99 7 . 1 0 12+00 99 6 . 5 7 12+50 99 6 . 3 0 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 12" PVC WATERMAIN C900- DR 11 (DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED) 12" PVC WATERMAIN 7.5' MIN. COVER EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION ABOVE WATERMAIN EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION ABOVE WATERMAIN K: \ 0 1 7 5 7 1 - 0 0 0 \ C a d \ P l a n \ 0 1 7 5 7 1 - 0 0 0 - W A T R - P L A N . d w g 5/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 2 1 : 0 6 : 1 8 P M WATERMAIN PLAN 5 AS SHOWN N SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SE E S H E E T MA T C H L I N E S T A : 8+ 0 0 4 CHIPPEWA ROAD SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: SHEET OF WSB PROJECT NO. I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , OR R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y DI R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A D U L Y LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E LA W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . LI C . N O : DA T E : RE V I S I O N S NO . DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N CH I P P E W A R O A D W A T E R M A I N E X T E N S I O N ME D I N A , M I N N E S O T A 017571-000 JA M E S L . S T R E M E L , P . E . 45 7 8 2 5/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 2 5 AKM JLSBB END12" WATERMAIN (DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED) STA.11+40 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 12" GATE VALVE OVERDEPTH WATERMAIN TO AVOID HIGH POINT, INCIDENTAL LEGEND BIOROLL - INSTALL PROIOR TO DISTURBANCE RESTORE WITHIN 7-DAYS OF WORK WITH MNDOT SEED MIX 35-241 @ 36.5 LB/AC & TYPE 2 FERTILIZER @ 200 LB/AC & EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (ROLLED EROSION CONTROL CATEGORY 35) EXISTING HYDRANT Resolution No. 2022-XX August 16, 2022 1 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX RECOGNIZING ANNE KLAERS FOR FIFTEEN YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITY OF MEDINA WHEREAS, Anne Klaers has been a valued City of Medina employee in the Police Department of the City since August 6, 2007; and WHEREAS, Anne has served as a dedicated Administrative Assistant at the City of Medina for fifteen years; and WHEREAS, Anne has worked many rolls for the City of Medina such as Finance Clerk and coordinating the annual City of Medina Celebration Day for many years; and WHEREAS, Anne has served as a dedicated full-time Administrative Assistance for the Medina Police Department since September 28, 2018; and WHEREAS, Anne is always friendly and has great customer service skills; and WHEREAS, Anne is always willing to go the extra step to help all the officers in their time of need; and WHEREAS, Anne exemplifies the true meaning of the City of Medina’s Core Values (Teamwork, Trust, Professionalism and Communication) as she is all of these wrapped into one; and WHEREAS, the City of Medina expresses sincere gratitude for Anne’s dedication and continued service to the Medina community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Medina acknowledges and thanks Anne Klaers for fifteen years of service to the community. Dated: August 16, 2022. Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk Agenda Item #7A Resolution No. 2022-XX August 16, 2022 2 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Medina Apartments LLC – 500 Hamel Road Page 1 of 8 August 16, 2021 Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: August 11, 2022 MEETING: August 16, 2022 City Council SUBJ: Medina Apartments LLC– 500 Hamel Road – Concept Plan Review – Summary of Request Medina Apartments LLC has requested review of a concept plan review for development of a 97-unit apartment project at 500 Hamel Road. The subject property is located north of Hamel Road, across from Elm Creek Drive. The property is approximately 6.7 acres in size (4.9 net acres), is currently vacant and guided and zoned Uptown Hamel. The northern portion of the site slopes down to a wetland, and the western portion of the site includes a stormwater pond which was constructed by the City to treat stormwater from the site and property to the west. Rainwater Nature Preserve is located east of the site, with the rest of Uptown Hamel to the east. Single family homes are located to the south, with fourplexes to the southwest. The property to the west includes warehouse uses. An aerial of the site and surrounding property can be found below. Purpose of Concept Plan Review MEMORANDUM Agenda Item #8A Medina Apartments LLC – 500 Hamel Road Page 2 of 8 August 16, 2021 Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting Concept plan reviews are encouraged for new development within Uptown Hamel. According to Section 825.63 of the City Code: “Concept plan review serves as the basis for informal conceptual discussion between the city and the applicant regarding a specific land use proposal. It is designed to assist the applicant in preparing a formal land use application for the city’s consideration. The purpose of the concept plan review is to identify significant issues, suggest design considerations and discuss requirements of the city’s official controls.” Comprehensive Plan/Zoning The subject property is guided Uptown Hamel in the Comprehensive Plan and zoned Uptown Hamel (UH). The purpose of the Uptown Hamel district is “to create a distinctive Uptown Hamel area that is an attractive, pedestrian-friendly, mixed-use town center, by using building facades, porches, walkways, landscaped plazas, lighting, signage, landscaping and parking to blend retail, office, higher-density housing, specialty shops, and gathering spots into a unified and viable community.” Uptown Hamel allows commercial development, residential development with a net density between 4-20 units/acre or a combination of commercial and residential development. Proposed Site Layout The concept proposes a three-story, 97-unit apartment building with underground parking. Additional surface parking is proposed north of the building. The site includes approximately 4.9 net acres and allows a residential density of 4-15 units/acre (up to 20/units/acre with underground parking). This would equate to a range of 20-98 units on the subject property. The western 1.5 acres of site is a stormwater pond and filtration basin that treats stormwater from a broader area to the west in addition to the subject site. The Uptown Hamel district requires buildings to be set closer to the street with parking behind the building. In this case, there is a 30 foot wide Metropolitan Council sewer main easement north of Hamel Road. This easement prevents the buildings from being located closer than 30 feet to Hamel Road. Staff believes the existence of the sewer easement creates a practical difficulty in meeting the maximum 10-foot setback and would justify either a variance or otherwise providing a deviation from the requirement. UH Requirement Proposed Minimum Lot Area per Dwelling 2178 s.f. 2200 s.f. Maximum Lot Area per Dwelling 10,890 s.f. 2200 s.f Minimum Lot Size N/A 6.73 acres Minimum Lot Width N/A 590 feet Minimum Lot Depth N/A 492 feet Min. Front Yard Setback 0 feet 30 feet (Hamel Rd) Max. Front Yard Setback 10 feet 30 feet (Hamel Rd) Rear Yard Setback As necessary 229 feet Side Yard Setback 8 feet (or 0) 48 feet Max Height 50 feet 45 feet Max. Hardcover 90% Not provided Medina Apartments LLC – 500 Hamel Road Page 3 of 8 August 16, 2021 Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting The subject site slopes from west to east. The applicant proposes to set the basement floor at the approximate elevation of the lower portion of the site on the east. It does not appear practical for the lower floor to be any lower because of adjacent ponds, wetlands, and floodplains. The conceptual grading plan proposes to add fill to the western portion of the site to bury the lower level. The first floor and ground elevation in this area would sit approximately 8 feet higher than Hamel Road. The City had reviewed a 17-unit villa development upon this site last year from a different developer. The previous applicant indicated that they were not going to proceed with the project as a result of the site development costs. Architectural Design The Uptown Hamel district includes the following architectural requirements. • Materials. Exterior materials shall consist of one or more of the following: natural brick, stucco, stone, wood, glass, or commercial grade fiber cement lap siding with a wood appearance which is installed per manufacturer’s specifications. Treated or anodized metal may be used for trim. • General. All new buildings, structures, expansions, remodeling, and development plans shall conform to these design standards and be compatible and complementary to the buildings proposed to be retained downtown. Elements of compatibility include, but are not limited to: building height, form, mass and bulk, fenestration, exterior material appearance, color, exterior material durability, detailing, setbacks, landscaping, exterior lighting and site improvements. • Building - Street. Building design shall make the street visually more interesting, functionally more enjoyable and useful and economically more viable. Buildings, porches, and plaza spaces shall be designed to bring the building and its activity more in contact with the street. • New Building and Major Expansions. New buildings… should be compatible with adjacent and nearby buildings. Buildings shall be designed and oriented consistent with this ordinance, proposed use of the property, uses on adjacent properties and nearby amenities. Buildings shall be designed and oriented so as not to detract from one another or vistas. Views from the residential areas should be protected. Where these views exist, partial loss of the view may be an unintended but justified result when development takes place consistent with other provisions of this ordinance. Entrances shall be placed for easy access from the street. Utilities shall be placed underground and meters and transformers shall be hidden from view. • Integrate – Coordinate. New buildings, structures, remodeling and expansion shall be integrated and coordinated with development on abutting property. Elements for integration and coordination include, but are not limited to, sidewalk and pedestrian ways and their continuity; site lighting; site access; building orientation; building entrances… • Porches (Overhangs – Canopies – Arcades). Porches, which overhang into walks, are one of Uptown Hamel’s trademarks. These features should be preserved, enhanced, and improved. New commercial structures on Hamel Road and Sioux Drive are expected to be designed and constructed with these features. Medina Apartments LLC – 500 Hamel Road Page 4 of 8 August 16, 2021 Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting • Fenestration – Modulation. Windows and openings shall be generous, especially on the street side, and their placement and design shall express the pedestrian- friendly, livability of the town center. …Buildings shall be modulated a minimum of once per 40 feet in frontage to avoid long, monotonous building walls. This modulation may include varying building height, building setback, or building materials/design. At the street level, at least 30 percent of the façade should be glass in windows and doors. • Plazas. Plazas or small extensions of the sidewalk into or on private property are encouraged especially at key focal points and selected locations. Plazas will serve as a unifying link between businesses and sidewalks. The design and form of the plazas shall accommodate social and business interaction, provide a setting for buildings, sidewalks and other plazas, and should accommodate sitting, watching and in some instances outdoor food services. Plazas shall include special pavements (for example, concrete brick pavers or exposed aggregate), decorative lights and decorative trees, shrubs and flowers with emphasis on providing a variety of color, texture, and form throughout the year. … Decorative fences and walls will be used to delineate spaces and to accommodate grade changes. Plaza furniture is encouraged including benches, drinking fountains, bike racks, waste containers, kiosks, and decorative signs and plaques. Monuments and sculpture will be encouraged e.g. clock towers, gazebos, water fountains, etc. …” The applicant provided a conceptual elevation of the Hamel Road facing portion of the building without dimensions or specific information on materials. Based upon the limited information provided, the proposed architecture appears to propose covered patios along Hamel Road. Because of the sewer easement and proposed grade change, these will set further back from the trail/sidewalk. The applicant does propose a walkway connection with the trail along Hamel Road. The conceptual architectural sketch does not specify materials, but appears to propose LP or fiber cement siding which is permitted in the Uptown Hamel district. Board and batten accents are also shown. Staff would suggest additional accent materials be considered upon final design. The proposed elevations appear to provide a fair amount of modulation as described in the code. The conceptual elevation also shows a significant number of windows. The conceptual elevations do not appear to set the street-facing third story back as required. Staff would recommend that these elements be included on a formal request. Transportation/Pedestrian/Trails/Park Dedication The applicant proposes a driveway at the Hamel Road/Elm Creek Drive intersection. This driveway would provide access to the underground parking on the east of the building and continue behind the building to provide access to the surface parking. Hamel Fire has recommended a 2nd access to the parking lot in case the access is blocked. Staff believes providing a 2nd access point is challenging and notes that the structure is also accessible from Hamel Road. Staff recommends that the circulation within the parking lot be improved and other measures be implemented in consultation with the Fire Department to mitigate the single access point. Medina Apartments LLC – 500 Hamel Road Page 5 of 8 August 16, 2021 Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting Hamel Road has a speed limit of 30 MPH adjacent to the site, so the City Engineer does not believe turn lane improvements are necessary. While the apartment building would generate a significant number of trips, the City Engineer does not find that this would cause congestion or impacts to the broader local transportation system. The City Engineer has recommended that an analysis to determine whether improvements should be required to Hamel Road to better accommodate turning maneuvers at the proposed driveway. The project may necessitate widening of Hamel Road to improve turning maneuverability into the site access. The concept plan shows construction of a trail along the north side of Hamel Road, which has been identified in the City’s trail plan. Staff would recommend construction of this trail as part of the park dedication requirements of the site. A sidewalk connection is proposed from the trail to the entrance of the building as well as to connect to some of the first floor patios. Staff recommends that recreational amenities be included in the final design. The City reviewed park dedication for the subject site when it was split from the land to the east back in 2019. At the time, the City determined that no land would be required for park dedication, but rather a cash-in-lieu fee of $3500 per unit, which would amount to $339,500 for 97 units with credit for the cost of construction of the trail improvements along Hamel Road. Soils/Buried Debris A significant amount of buried construction debris has been identified on the site. A Phase I and Phase II Environmental Assessment were completed in 2006-2007. The Assessments identified buried construction debris on the site. Soil borings and water sampling identified some locations which exceeded Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), arsenic and other chemical which were measured. In addition, when the City excavated for the ponds in the western portion of the site, tiles which contained asbestos were encountered and had to be disposed of properly. It is recommended that a Response Action Plan (RAP) and Contingency Construction Plan (CCP) be implemented for construction activity on the site. These documents establish a plan on how construction will be conducted, how materials will be handled and sampled, which materials will need to be disposed of and in which manner, and other means to limit groundwater or other contamination. The previous villa development would have required public utilities to be located on-site which would have interacted with the buried debris. Construction of the apartment building will significantly reduce potential issues with city utilities. There are grants available to assist with the extra cost of developing contaminated sites, completing the necessary documentation and testing, and disposing of hazardous materials. If the developer applies for such funds, staff recommends that the City support the application. The applicant has indicated that they are aware of the potential challenges posed by the debris and soils conditions on the site. They have engaged engineering consultants to conduct additional exploration and prepare appropriate plans for handling the debris. The applicant’s consultant has indicated that based on their investigation and professional judgement, the necessary mitigation is similar to much of their previous experience and hazardous risk during and after construction is low. Medina Apartments LLC – 500 Hamel Road Page 6 of 8 August 16, 2021 Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting Stormwater/LID Review/Grading Review The concept plan includes a conceptual grading plan. Stormwater management was provided for the site through construction of the stormwater pond in the western portion of the site as part of acquisition of the easement area. Grading and drainage plans will need to be designed to direct site runoff to the pond in the western portion of the site, or to provide additional treatment. The grading plan will also need to be designed so that it will not negatively impact the drainage from Hamel Road. Improvements will need to be constructed adjacent to Hamel Road (likely either curb/storm sewer or a ditch) to accommodate drainage from the new trail and from the site so that drainage does not negatively impact Hamel Road. There is a wetland along the northern portion of the site which also has a floodplain with a base flood elevation of 974.6. No wetland or floodplain impacts are proposed. The developer of the subject site is required to provide a small area of floodplain mitigation adjacent to the wetland to off-set the installation of a driveway on the eastern portion of the site (east of 492 Hamel Road). This property was subdivided from the subject site in 2019 and installation of a driveway will necessitate some fill within the floodplain of Elm Creek. To off- set this fill, the property owner agreed that the developer of the subject site would mitigate the floodplain. Sewer/Water The concept plan does not provide detail on utilities, but it would be anticipated that the building would be supported by a service from Hamel Road. Extension of City infrastructure into the site will likely be very limited. Tree Preservation and Landscaping The Uptown Hamel zoning district does not require specific landscaping plantings. A minimum of 5% of the site is required to be landscaped, anticipating more of a “downtown” development form. The concept submittal did not include proposed landscaping detail. There are 108 trees on the site, mostly consisting of volunteer trees such as boxelder and cottonwood. The City’s tree preservation would allow 37 (35%) of the trees to be removed without replacement. The applicant proposes to remove 73 trees. Replacement beyond the allowed amount is required on an inch:inch basis. Because of the large size of the trees on the site, this would result in 441 inches of replacement trees. Section 828.41 Subd. 7 provides for a waiver of a portion of the replacement when “an applicant has exhausted all reasonable design options for a Development Site.” Staff acknowledges that most of the trees would need to be removed to develop this site at the density identified in the Comprehensive Plan, especially the cottonwood and boxelder trees scattered throughout the center of the property. Staff believes it is appropriate to consider some amount of waiver, but recommends that landscaping plans accommodate as much on-site planting as practical. Medina Apartments LLC – 500 Hamel Road Page 7 of 8 August 16, 2021 Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting City Code generally prohibits the use of domestic City water for use in lawn irrigation systems. Generally, a neighborhood utilizes stormwater reuse from ponds for irrigation purposes. Because this property is utilizing a City stormwater pond for treatment, this will require additional consideration. The City’s water supply ordinance allows for waivers from the irrigation prohibition where properties are served by a City stormwater system. City staff recommends that, if possible, an irrigation system be installed to reuse water from the City stormwater pond west of the site. At this time, the applicant has not provided detail to allow for this. If it can be shown that irrigating from the City pond is not practical, staff would recommend that irrigation systems be permitted on City water. Staff Comments The Planning Commission and Council will not take formal action, but should provide comments on the Concept Plan to inform a future application. Staff has provided comments throughout the report, which are summarized below: 1. Future land use requests shall be subject to relevant provisions of the City Code. 2. A Response Action Plan (RAP) and Contingency Construction Plan (CCP) be implemented for construction activity on the site. 3. A variance would need to be requested for the increased setback from Hamel Road because of the existing sewer easement on the property. 4. A trail shall be constructed along the north side of Hamel Road and pedestrian circulation should be provided within the site. 5. Architectural plans shall meet the requirements of the Uptown Hamel district. Specifically, the third-story facing Hamel Road should be set back as required. 6. The applicant shall provide a turning analysis and update the site layout ensure adequate emergency vehicle circulation. 7. The applicant shall provide required floodplain storage as described in the development agreement for Raskobs Elm Creek Addition. 8. If it is possible to do so and with the agreement of the City, the development shall utilize the stormwater pond to the west for reuse for lawn irrigation. 9. Future plans shall address the recommendations of the City Engineer. 10. Park dedication shall be provided as cash-in-lieu fee of $3500 per unit. Planning Commission Comments The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the concept plan at their August 10 meeting. An excerpt from the meeting minutes is attached for reference. Approximately 12 people spoke at the hearing and the City has received 17 written comments, which are attached. Several of the speakers at the hearing had provided written comments. Comments received raised concerns about the proposed density, traffic, and height, scale, and design of the building. Comments also raised concerns related to disturbance of the buried debris on the site. Planning Commissioners stated that the massing and design of the building did seem out of character with what they would expect in Uptown Hamel. Commissioners suggested reducing the scale and improving the design of the building to reduce massing or the perception of Medina Apartments LLC – 500 Hamel Road Page 8 of 8 August 16, 2021 Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting massing. Commissioners emphasized the importance of on-site recreational amenities and landscaping. City Council Feedback Requested The applicant has indicated that they appreciate the feedback from the public hearing and Planning Commission. The applicant has requested feedback from the City Council as well to inform how they will proceed with the project. The applicant has indicated that they would be interested in hosting a neighborhood meeting if neighbors are interested and continuing discussion of how to implement a viable apartment project on the site. Attachments 1. Excerpt from DRAFT 8/10/2022 Planning Commission minutes 2. Comments Received 3. Engineering Comments 4. Applicant Narrative 5. Concept Plan Documents Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 8/10/2022 Minutes 1 Public Hearing – Medina Apartments LLC – 500 Hamel Road – Concept Plan for Construction of a 97-Unit Apartment Building (PID 1211823310048) Finke presented a concept plan for a 97-unit apartment building proposed to be located at 500 Hamel Road. He stated that the subject site is about 7 acres in size, with a net acreage of just under five acres when the wetlands are removed. He reported a net density of 19.8 units per acre. He reviewed the surrounding uses and stated that the subject site is zoned and guided as Uptown Hamel and contemplates a mix of residential and commercial uses with a density range of four to 20 units per acres. He noted that underground parking would be required to support more than 15 units per acre. He stated that this is an opportunity to provide feedback to the developer prior to submission of formal application. He stated that the proposed building would front Hamel Road and would be four stories, with the bottom story to be underground parking. He noted that there would be additional parking proposed north of the building. He stated that this site has utilities running in the front of the site near the road and therefore the building would be proposed to be setback from the road by 30 feet in order to not interfere with those utilities. He reviewed details of the rendering provided by the applicant as well as the proposed access and trail. He noted that if this moves forward, staff would recommend onsite recreation improvements because of the distance to a regional park. He noted that this project would utilize private sewer and water services. He commented that this site was previously considered for a villa project and the debris on site was discussed in depth. He noted that this project would need to follow the similar process identified for debris removal. He stated that the applicant would propose permitted architectural materials and provided additional details on the architectural details proposed. He commented that there are relatively few sites that have been designated for higher density development and this is one of them. Piper asked if this is the same property that was reviewed the previous year for a similar development. Finke stated that the City granted preliminary plat approval for a 17-unit villa development on this site. Rhem asked if the first-floor elevations would be above grade. Finke provided additional details on the grade. Rhem asked for more clarification on the third-floor setback. Finke replied that the zoning district requires a third story to be setback from the other two stories. Grajczyk asked for details on the infrastructure. Finke replied that the developer would install the infrastructure necessary. He noted that this use would not require a sewer or watermain extension, whereas the previous concept for this property would have had a looper watermain. Popp asked if there were any standout concerns related to traffic from WSB. Finke replied that WSB suggested a right turn lane into the site. Mark Buchholz, applicant, stated that they are willing to work together to achieve a common goal in a respectful manner. He provided background information on their company which began 30 years ago. He commented that their narrative provides information about the project. He stated that this development would provide vibrancy to the area and fulfill a demand for high density housing in the community. He stated that they felt that this would be the highest and best use for the site given the proximity to Highway 55 and the location off Hamel Road which is a collector roadway. He noted that Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 8/10/2022 Minutes 2 this would provide a transition from industrial, to medium density and low-density housing. He stated that they hold Uptown Hamel in high regard and therefore want to bring a good project to that area. He provided details on previous projects they have completed, even on highly contaminated sites. Popp asked if there an approximate sale price for the units. Buchholz replied that these would be luxury apartment rentals. He recognized that there can be a stigma towards rental units, but these would be luxury and their company would continue to manage the property. He stated that apartment living is not just for those that cannot afford something else, as there are people that desire that type of living. He stated that this provides an opportunity for people that do not want to maintain yards and property but still want to stay in the community. He stated that the average rent would be about $2,000 per unit and would range from $1,500 to above $2,000. Popp stated that development opportunities have come forward on this parcel in the past and the contamination has been a big discussion item. He asked for details on the plan to mitigate that. Buchholz stated that when they look to purchase a property, they complete due diligence on the site. He stated that they also have experience in contaminated sites, therefore they do not have concerns in properly managing that material. Jacob asked for details on the clean up process for the site, how long that would take and where the materials would be disposed of. Mark Kiefer, environmental consultant, stated that construction material has been buried on this site and common contaminates have been created as a result. He stated that this type of contamination is not mobile. He stated that they did complete soil samples. He stated that he helped to draft the response action plan for the previous development proposal for this site and that would be updated and submitted to the MPCA by September 1st. He stated that this firm would have people onsite during the construction process and removal of materials. He stated that putting a building on top of this site would probably be the best solution as rainwater is just infiltrating on the site currently. He provided details on the removal and construction process noting that full excavation of the material would not be required. He stated that they would remove the materials necessary to make the site safe and support construction. He stated that there would be an environmental covenant for the site that would remain with the property. Piper asked where the contamination is located on the site. Kiefer replied that it is primarily located where the parking lot would be. Piper commented that there are 121 parking spaces proposed and asked how many of those would be located underground. Buchholz replied that there would generally be a one-to-one ratio of units to underground parking stalls. He stated that their proposal exceeds the number of parking spaces required as well. Jacob asked if on street parking would also be a part of this project. Finke stated that although street parking is encouraged in Uptown Hamel, this proposal would not include on street parking. He noted that staff would most likely continue discussions about the possibility of including on street parking. Piper asked if there would be elevators in the building. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 8/10/2022 Minutes 3 Buchholz replied that there would be one elevator in the building. Piper commented that there would be children living in the building and asked where they would play. Buchholz stated that they are committed to providing as much green space as possible and noted the greenspace to the east as well as the proximity to Hamel Park. He stated that they are open to discussing additional recreational opportunities. Nielsen asked if the applicant is in agreement with the conditions and input within the staff report. Buchholz confirmed that they do agree with the majority of those comments. He stated that they believe the current design meets the design criteria related to the third story setback. Nielsen asked if the developer is considering any allocation of affordable housing units. Buchholz replied that they are not as they would be marketing these units as luxury apartments. Nielsen asked if the applicant has considered a more integrated design with the property to the east. Buchholz replied that they would be open to that but have not yet had conversations with the property to the east but are open to those conversations. Rhem referenced the recommendation from Hamel Fire for a second access and asked if that has been considered. Buchholz stated that he interpreted that comment to be either to have a second access or demonstrate that a fire truck could loop through. He noted that they were planning to demonstrate that the vehicle could loop through. Grajczyk asked if the site would be built up through grading. Buchholz stated that there are some restrictions related to water levels that dictate the lowest floor, which would be the underground parking. He stated that while he would like to keep that low, they also have to meet the requirements of the watershed district. He stated that their plan would be to bring fill in. Todd Olin commented that he was also involved in the previous application. He stated that the lowest level elevation was defined for the site based on the stormwater basin and wetland which provided data on the lowest floor elevation. He stated that they can meet those regulations, which require that the building be lifted up a bit but that can be softened visually while ensuring there is not a water problem. Sedabres stated that there is a wide range in the density for this property and asked how it was determined that the right fit for this site would be 97 units. Buchholz replied that there is a lot of land that they would not be disturbing as there are over six acres on this property. He stated that they feel that this density would be appropriate and would bring families and individuals to the area that would support the local businesses and could draw in additional desired commercial development in Uptown Hamel. Sedabres asked if the applicant owns the property and whether they are the sole entity involved in the LLC. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 8/10/2022 Minutes 4 Buchholz replied that his firm does own the property. Nielsen opened the public hearing at 7:47 p.m. Finke acknowledged the 15 comments received prior to the meeting that will become a part of the public record. Fred Stetler, previous developer for this site, commented that he did his darndest to make his project work with the challenges on the site. He noted the contaminates, soil corrections, and improper location for the regional ponding basin. He stated that those challenges ate up the profit margin and there was no contingency left, therefore the project could not move forward. He commented that the contamination is a result of the buried building not a toxic dump. He stated that this building would be positioned in a way that mostly does not disrupt that buried debris therefore very little material would have to be removed from the site. He stated that this would be luxury apartments and would be a beautiful building. Deb Connoly, 3411 Elm Creek Drive, stated that the vision for Uptown Hamel is to be distinctive with greenspace and plazas. He stated that integrated and coordinated design is also mentioned. She did not believe that this property would meet any of those goals as the building would be out of scale compared to other properties and the design is quite common. She stated that she was also concerned with density and traffic increases. She stated that a widening of Hamel Road is mentioned and asked how that would impact the current residents and who would be responsible for that cost. She believed that this project only benefits the developer and Met Council. She asked if a luxury apartment dweller would want to live between a railroad track and an industrial building. Nielsen asked what the resident would like to see on the site. Connoly replied that she would be fine with housing but perhaps half the scale. She stated that she would also be fine with a warehouse. She stated that with outside parking there would need to be lighting at all hours of the night which would also be a concern. Nielsen asked that all speakers not only provide their comments, but also comment on what they would like to see on the site if they do not support this concept. Frank Minon, 3360 Red Fox Drive, expressed concern with the name of the company and its limited liability status. He asked the gross amount of building the building. He stated that if the developer cannot build the building, they are not suable because of its limited liability. He stated that he has lived in Hamel for 40 years and was required to purchase four acres in order to build one home. He asked if this would be the largest number of units on a property in Medina. He stated that even though the company has 30 years of experience, the creation of this limited liability status takes that away. He stated that he would not want to see this number of units on the property. He stated that perhaps it is time for him to move on, but he still wants the best for those that will remain. Kendall Arrow,34345 Elm Creek Drive, stated that her concerns have already been shared by others and therefore she will jump to her proposed alternatives. She suggested reducing the scale of the building, finding nontoxic land for this development, do not build anything on the site and turn it into a nature preserve, build a mix of rental residential and commercial space, build on slab, or to change the design. She stated that this type of development is common in North Dakota and is not aesthetically pleasing and would not be a good fit for Uptown Hamel. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 8/10/2022 Minutes 5 Jennifer Bell, 3485 Elm Creek Drive, commented that she moved from Uptown Minneapolis and has two young children. She stated that she is very familiar with large apartment life and that is the opposite of the reason she moved to this area. She noted that many of her comments have been covered by previous speakers and through her written comments. She noted that the previous developer mentioned that the MPCA views this as a brownfield and if there is a way to keep that, that would be the recommended method. She asked why then this is not just left alone. She commented that she has not seen a plan that would mitigate that cleanup in a way that does not impact the existing residents. She stated that she would prefer to see a two-story building with perhaps commercial or a restaurant use. She commented that there has to be a middle ground between the 17 units previously proposed and the 97 units proposed in this concept. Grant Curt, 575 Hamel Road, stated that he does not have air conditioning and was concerned that the contamination could be mobilized into his home during construction. He stated that he loves the quiet nature of Hamel, and he currently lives across from an open field. He was unsure the length of construction and the impact that noise would have on his home. He commented that people already speed on the roadway and was concerned with adding that number of vehicles. He stated that he loves seeing and hearing the train go by and commented that 97 units would add a new condition that has not previously existed. Mike Holman, 3311 Red Fox Drive, stated that many of his comments were already provided by previous residents. He asked the benefit to the community that this would add. He stated that there have already been 30 townhomes approved for a nearby property and with these 97 units that would quadruple the number of residents in this area. He noted that neither of those plans included play areas for children or public amenities, therefore this would just add more residents to draw. He stated that he would like to see a reduced scale to the project and more public/community benefit. Duane Hendrickson, 185 Hamel Road, stated that he also owns the property at 4595 Pioneer Trail and has been in Medina for a decade and is President of his HOA and is speaking on behalf of those homeowners. He stated that in the last decade the traffic on Hamel Road has continued to increase with vehicles racing up and down the road. He commented that Hamel is a precious gem, and he does not believe this project belongs on Hamel Road. He stated that there are so many uncertainties. He stated that he would love to see fewer units on the property with more space. He commented that this is not an attractive project in his mind and is way too big for the community and would be an eyesore. Kyle Gregor, 495 Ridgeview Circle, commented that this building does not have any place in Hamel. He commented that the site is not suitable for this type of development because of the contamination that lies below. He stated that even though the developer has experience in developing contaminated sites, the conditions of each site are different. He was concerned with the construction process and removal of materials and the impact that could have on residents and the creek. He stated that he would like to see nothing on the site. Bill Wades, Elm Creek Drive, commented that many people opposed their development and did not want it, but he was glad the Council approved the project. He stated that his main concern was with where greenspace would be located. He noted that perhaps they could work with the adjacent lot to preserve greenspace on the overall site. He stated that perhaps a stop sign could be placed at Hamel Road and Elm Creek Drive. He referenced an existing multi-family building in Hamel, which is owner occupied and was done well. He stated that perhaps more variation and detail could be added to make the building look nicer. He noted that perhaps the building could also be setback further. He suggested that perhaps a fence be added to prevent children from playing on the railroad tracks. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 8/10/2022 Minutes 6 Greg Hoglund, 19220 Hackamore Road in Corcoran, stated that he also owns properties in Hamel and has spent time and effort in bringing Hamel to life over the years. He asked if the building could be built anywhere else in Medina or whether flexibility is being requested to have a three-story building with an additional floor of underground parking. Finke replied that this use could be constructed on similarly guided high density residential property in Medina, which is limited in availability. Hoglund stated that if this is allowed, it would set precedent for other buildings of this size. He commented that if that is the vision of Uptown Hamel, so be it. He stated that if the building does not meet the height requirement, or if special flexibility is being provided for that height, that will set precedent. He stated that he is opposed to this development. Dan Lamere, 4625 Brockton, stated that he prefers ownership rather than rental units. He stated that he would rather not see this type of development but would prefer ownership of units. He asked and received confirmation that the existing pond would remain onsite. He stated that he has concern with traffic. He stated that his family has owned property in Hamel since the 1920s and he would love to see it remain as greenspace. Rett Fiskness, architect for the applicant, stated that in terms of architecture there is function and artistic. He noted that much of what is seen is functional criteria that meets the zoning code. He stated that the biggest challenge is to be contextual to the site and community as a whole. He provided additional input on the concepts that have been integrated into the design and the American colonial design that attempts to blend with the existing architecture in Hamel. He stated that the primary issues appear to be the scale and they can incorporate additional design details based on the input received. Andy Bell, 3485 Elm Creek Drive, stated that he believes that there would be additional traffic on the other roads that connect to Hamel Drive such as Pinto and Elm Creek Drive as a result of this project. Buchholz stated that one comment that came up multiple times was related to traffic. He stated that has been a consideration throughout this process. He stated that currently there are 2,500 vehicles per day on Hamel Road. He stated that people believe that apartments have traffic all day every day. He noted that in order to have restaurants and bars, you have to have the residential density to support those uses. He stated that they are attempting to provide that in a respectful manner. He appreciated the feedback received tonight and noted that he is willing to follow up with any residents that wish to continue conversations. He did not anticipate that the traffic on other roads would be impacted by this development as people would take Hamel Road to Pinto or Sioux to reach Highway 55. He believed that people would be surprised with the lack of traffic and/or movement from this development. He stated that development occurs in the community, those infrastructure needs will change. A resident asked the number of luxury buildings the developer currently has and where those are located. Buchholz replied that his business is based out of Fargo, North Dakota and provided details on the markets in which they operate in both North Dakota and Minnesota. He commented that they are in the process of a large redevelopment project in Monticello and have a letter of recommendation from that community and also have a recommendation letter from the City of Moorhead for that luxury project. He stated that they are also in the process of a development in Elk River. He noted that there are several luxury buildings in Moorhead. He stated that architecturally they design for the community, recognizing that what fits in Fargo does not fit in Medina. He stated that their intent is to design to the site and community rather than repeat a building in every community. He noted some of the design elements that they would aim to emulate in this design to fit with the community. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 8/10/2022 Minutes 7 Nielsen closed the public hearing at 8:35 p.m. Sedabres commented that he recognizes that the density fits the requirement but does not believe this meets the spirit of Uptown Hamel. He commented that this does not fit what he believes is the vision for Uptown Hamel. He appreciated the input of the developer to be a good neighbor but noted that this is one unit under the maximum density allowed. He stated that the plaza use, and walkability should be better considered. Grajczyk echoed many of the comments made by Sedabres. He stated that in previous reviews there have been concerns with the contamination and he would prefer to see the material excavated and removed. He commented that the size and scale of the building does not fit with the area. He also had concern with traffic. He stated that the residents spoke tonight and have unknowingly reiterated the vision of Hamel with open spaces and a more rural feel. He recognized that this is a challenging lot but believes that something could be developed that would fill the space and help to grow the community. Rhem commented that although the density is allowed by code, it does not seem to meet the vision of Hamel. He stated that whether that is done through front porches, modulation, or lesser heights, it should be considered. He stated that parks and amenities speak towards the connectivity of Hamel. He also expressed concern with the comments from Fire and the single entrance for so many residents. Nielsen stated that she has been in the community since 1970 and has seen a lot of change during that time. She commented that change is inevitable. She stated that while she would not mind seeing apartments, she would like to see density scaled back. She agreed with the comments of the others related to scale and the vision and character for Uptown Hamel. Piper agreed with the comments of the other members of the Commission. She stated that it is hard to imagine, should this be built, that someone would have a brand-new baby and walk a half mile to reach greenspace. Jacob echoed the comments of the Commission. He stated that he would like to see more landscaping with a rural/prairie look. He recognized that this is a concept but would like to see those additional details. Popp stated that he supports the comments made thus far. He stated that this is the first impression of Uptown Hamel coming from the west and therefore that should be considered and adds to the challenges of this site. Piper stated that she came to the community in 1966 and asked the year the ballroom burned. It was estimated to have occurred in the early 1970’s. Buchholz appreciated the feedback and comments from the Commission and residents tonight. Nielsen briefly recessed the meeting. Nielsen reconvened the meeting. 1 Dusty Finke From:Kate Agarwala <kateminor83@hotmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 9, 2022 1:52 PM To:Dusty Finke; Debra Dion; Brenda Ruth; Kathleen Martin; Dino Deslauriers; Todd Albers; Joseph Cavanaugh Subject:500 Hamel Road I am writing in regards to the proposed apartment complex to be located at 500 Hamel Road. I understand that there is a meeting this week and since I am unable to attend, I wanted to voice my opposition to this project. I live in the Enclave and use Hamel Road frequently. Currently, the road can be difficult to traverse when there are cars on both sides of the road especially near the intersection at Hamel Road and Sioux Drive and when near St. Anne's, the Hamel Post Office, and by the entrance/exit to the Hamel Community Center. This road does not have the capacity to handle any more traffic. I am also concerned about the hazardous material buried beneath the proposed site. I urge you to turn down this proposal. Sincerely, Kate Agarwala 3241 Butternut Drive Medina, MN 55340 1 Dusty Finke From:Andrea Usset <a_usset@hotmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 9, 2022 5:48 PM To:Dusty Finke Subject:500 Hamel Road Proposal Good evening, Unfortunately I am unable to attend the public hearing tomottow for the proposed development at 500 Hamel Road and wanted to share my concerns with you. My Grandparents built their first house in Hamel (was just torn down across from Greenwood Elementary School.) I attended Greenwood and now my chilren do too. We live in Elm Creek Drive and although I am not opposed to more housing options in Hamel, I am very concerned about the newest proposal by Buccholz Properties for 500 Hamel Road. I am concerned about the size of the unit and how It will add increased traffic, remove trees, expose long-buried debris, and potentially strain city and school resources. I have always loved how quaint of a town Hamel is and this seems very invasive. I loved growing up in Hamel and enjoying the rurual feeling of it...Hamel has since very much expanded since I was young and I can appreciate those changes. I love raising my children here and am very concerned and opposed to this new proposal for the 90+unit appartment building. Please do not allow this proposal to move forward. Please feel free to contact me with any follow up questions. Kindly, Andrea Andersen (Usset) 3412 Elm Creek Dr Hamel, MN 55340 612-310-4718 CELL 1 Dusty Finke From:Kendall Aro <krjohnk@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, August 10, 2022 3:28 PM To:Beth Nielsen; Dusty Finke Subject:500 Hamel Road Dusty and Beth, My name is Kendall Aro, and I live at 3435 Elm Creek Drive. My husband and I moved to Hamel in 2019 and immediately fell in love with the history and charm found on Hamel Road. We were enormously impressed by the city administration’s ability to maintain such history and charm throughout the years. When I heard the proposal for 500 Hamel Road was now a 97‐unit apartment complex, I was taken aback. My neighbors and I have done extensive research on the vision for Uptown Hamel. Beyond the excavation of toxic soil and traffic concerns a few points I’d like to call out include the following: Design – this building does not have characteristics one would expect from a building located in a “historic” Uptown district. One of the objectives defined in the 2040 plan was enforcing building standards that enhance and maintain the small‐town heritage and traditional small‐ town look including brick facades. As I opened the proposal put forth by Buchholz Construction I was anticipating a design more in line with this and the recommendations put forth by the U of M study. I was not expecting to see a complex that looks like one of the hundreds you can find in the apartment sprawl of Fargo, North Dakota. Greenspace – Another objective in the 2040 comprehensive plan is to establish design criteria compatible with surrounding physical features and preservation of ecologically significant natural resources. Furthermore, Medina code states, “Respect and retain the woods and tree line and use them for views and natural amenity.” In addition to paving over one of the last remaining greenspaces in uptown Hamel and a wildlife corridor, the builder is proposing the removal of 73 mature trees. He is not adding any recreation or greenspace, in fact the city is not requiring any sort of landscaping for this development. All that said, in the last few years I’ve learned that if I’m going to bring a problem forward, I should have a solution. So what are the alternatives? 1. Reduce the scale: Why do we need 97 units? Is it to ensure profit could be made after paying for the site clean up? Maybe, but in 2016, Buchholz began development of apartments on a piece of land in Moorhead, Minnesota that was previously polluted with chlorine solvents. The clean up effort for this site was $1.8M, half of which was funded by a grant from the state of Minnesota and the other half was funded by tax credits. Buchholz will likely not be footing the bill for the asbestos and arsenic clean up, and there fore should not be worried about recouping the cost for cleanup. 2 2. Why this land? There are two other 10 acre properties without toxic soil for sale approximately 1 mile from this site for less than $1M. Why not build there, where there is no public health hazard? These properties have better access to crossroads to mitigate traffic concerns, and I repeat do not contain toxic soil. 3. Why build anything at all? If the cost of excavating buried toxins makes this non‐profitable without conceding the vision for uptown Hamel, why not obtain state funding to turn this site into a wildlife and/or pollinator preserve? I imagine the developer would get tax incentives for donating this property for environmental reasons. 4. Alternate build options: And if we are intent on someone profiting off this land, why not find an alternate solution to digging. Build on slabs, find a creative solution for utilities so as not to disturb the ground as recommended by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 5. Update the design: If all arguments heard by the community tonight are not enough to persuade the committee to walk away from this proposal, please challenge the developer to reconsider design plans that are more in line with city zoning and the 2040 plan to preserve Medina’s historic uptown charm. 6. Build a mix of residential and commercial which will provide local income? In the current proposal I’m estimating the rent generated income to an out of state developer of approximately $2 million annually. The bulk of revenue being generated by this development is not staying local. By developing a structure that is a mix of residential and commercial spaces, we would not only encourage local business but would also employ several local residents to help keep revenue local. There is a myriad of options that would be better suited at 500 Hamel Road than the current proposal, that I hope the planning committee urges city council to consider. Thank you for your consideration, Kendall Aro 1 Dusty Finke From:Morgan Bartkowski <mhbartkowski@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, August 8, 2022 7:36 PM To:Debra Dion; Dusty Finke; Beth Nielsen; Braden Rhem; Cindy Piper; John Jacob; Justin Popp; Robin Reid; Ron Grajczyk; Tim Sedabres Subject:500 Hamel Road Apartment Complex Hello ‐ My husband and I own the home at 445 Ridge View Circle in Medina and I am writing in opposition of the apartment complex proposed for 500 Hamel Road. The proposed 97 unit apartment building at 500 Hamel Road would be situated directly across the street from my neighborhood. My concerns about this development include: 1. The addition of a 97 unit apartment complex would be incongruous with the surrounding area which comprises single family homes, lower density townhomes, and "small town feeling" Hamel. 2. The proposed plan includes 200+ parking spaces which would drastically increase traffic on Hamel Road and worsen the congestion at Hamel Road and Sioux Drive. 3. The proposed site has buried toxic debris; will this be mitigated correctly? Is this safe for potential residents on the property? 5. Desirability of the property to renters, particularly its close proximity to active train tracks and an industrial area. Who is the targeted renter for this property? How well will the apartments be upkept? My concern is that in 5 years, the property will not be well kept or will be marketed to low‐income renters. This is also out of sync with the housing in the surrounding neighborhoods. 6. Lack of benefit to the community. The proposed plan consists of a massive 3‐story building. The plan does not include a playground, retail or restaurant space, no walking paths, and very little green space. What is it adding to uptown Hamel beyond more people? Furthermore, what does this out of state developer know or care about our community? They have no reason to thoughtfully develop this property as they have no repercussions if it is a blight on the community. Finally, I chose where I live because I wanted an older home in an established suburban neighborhood with low crime and good schools. The uptown Hamel area appealed to my family because it is quaint and differs from Maple Grove and Plymouth, which have grown rapidly but not retained any charm. Building a 97 unit apartment building would forever alter Hamel and not for the better. I strongly oppose the proposed apartment building at 500 Hamel Road because I believe it will negatively impact the character of my neighborhood and uptown Hamel, lower my property value, and increase crime and traffic in the immediate area. I appreciate you taking the time to read my email and I hope you consider the concerns of residents in the adjacent neighborhoods when evaluating this proposed development. 2 Morgan Bartkowski 1 Dusty Finke From:Jeff Becker <jeffreytbecker@hotmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 9, 2022 12:18 PM To:Dusty Finke Subject:Opposed to 500 Hamel development I am writing to let you know that I am vehemently opposed to this type of development for this location. Please reconsider. This area used to be beautiful ‐ now it seems that the only way forward is more and more unneeded developments. These roads cannot support the traffic, please leave the nature alone (too many areas have already been compromised by Lennar), and the toxins do not need to be disrupted. Enough is enough....STOP! Jeff Becker 3125 Wild Flower Trail Medina, MN 612‐889‐6750 Beth and Dusty, I live at 3485 Elm Creek Drive, directly across Hamel Road from the proposed development at 500 Hamel Road with my husband and our 4 year old twins. We moved here for the gentle creek meandering through our yard, for the beautiful mature trees, the abundant wildlife, and for the postcard views. We love our home, our neighborhood, and our community. We do not support this development for many reasons, the largest being the toxic waste buried beneath the land. The previous developer looking to build 17 villas stated in August of 2021, and I quote “the MPCA views this as a brownfield and if there is a viable way to leave that in place, they favor that as opposed to digging it up and moving it somewhere else”. This brownfield exists directly across the street from our home. Given what the MPCA has noted, what is the mitigation plan for the current residents directly impacted by potential disturbance of the brownfield? How do we combat any potential leaks of VOC’s into our yard and home? How exactly will this be handled safely and without harming us? There is also the increased traffic that comes with a development of this size with no pedestrian friendly access to public transportation. With a projected increase of 650+ trips for this development alone, I’ve read that the city engineer has found that this amount of traffic will not create any issues such as “cause congestion or impacts to the broader local transportation system” but I beg to differ. The back ups on Hamel Road at the intersections of Hunter and also Sioux Drive, especially during rush hours, are very real to the residents that already drive these roads. Additionally, on Hamel Road we currently have speeding issues with people driving through our community much faster than the 30 mph posted speed limit to the detriment of pedestrians. I imagine that the communities on Hunter Drive and Brockton Lane have similar experiences. Our neighborhood has no curbs and children and dog walkers are vulnerable to the increased traffic, and commuters seeking short-cuts, that a development of this size would no doubt bring. Finally, the massive scale of this development is overwhelming for our direct neighborhood and the community as a whole. In the August 3rd planning commission report from Dusty Finke, he noted that because of adjacent ponds, wetlands, and floodplains the first floor and ground elevation at 500 Hamel Road would sit approximately 8 feet higher than the road itself. This proposal is for a development totaling out at 45 feet high. The only other structure in Uptown Hamel that is 3 stories is Argent Parc, the 18 unit condominium building located across the street from St. Anne’s church and next to the Rusted Nail. That building sits about 35 feet tall. Think about how large the Argent Parc building feels in the heart of Uptown Hamel at 35 feet and 18 units, now envision a building a little under a mile aways that is more than 5 times larger at 97 units and 45 feet high across the street and next door to residential 2 story homes. The 500 Hamel Road development is not congruent with honoring the “rural heritage” and “well designed neighborhoods” that Medina notes in their city vision statement. Thank you for your time and consideration, Jennifer Bell 3485 Elm Creek Drive Jendav028@yahoo.com 1 Dusty Finke From:Michaela <michaelarb@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 9, 2022 12:34 PM To:Dusty Finke Subject:No development on Hamel Road! Hello, I am completely disheartened and upset to learn that you are going to take the one piece of charm out of our neighborhood. My family and I moved here in the summer of 2018 from Massachusetts, and I’ve seen so much beauty and nature destroyed by these awful, disgusting apartment building and cookie‐cutter neighbors you are busking. Greed is ruining our neighborhood, and what’s worse, you are ruining the nature and the homes of animals that live in it. Please stop. Michaela Becker 3125 Wild Flower Trail Medina, MN 55340 Ps‐Lennar’s poor planning for the Enclave neighborhood completely destroyed much of the forest behind our home— again, devastating the nature and animals that used to call it home. How no one has held them responsible for this is beyond me. 1 Dusty Finke From:Sharon Mohr <rsmohr@mchsi.com> Sent:Wednesday, August 10, 2022 2:33 PM To:Dusty Finke Subject:Apartment proposal on Hamel Road Hi, Dusty, Rock and I moved here for the small town rural feel and are hoping to live out our retirement in our small rural environment. Adding a 97 unit apartment building across the street will definitely change the rural nature environment we have. We see nothing in keeping with the vision of Uptown Hamel and will do nothing to make it more walkable— the increased traffic alone will make that all but impossible. The wetlands behind our house is home to so much wildlife and with the creek this area has become a travel area for so many creatures—a major reason we love it here. This building, with so many occupants, will stop that animal travel behavior and change our environment forever. The reasons that people move here will be gone and the city mission, “ to sustain and enhance the quality of life of its residents. Medina will protect its significant natural resources and open space throughout the City, while honoring its rural heritage” will be a lie. We are strongly opposed to this proposal. Please contact us if you have any questions. Rock and Sharon Mohr 3475 Elm Creek Drive Sent from my iPhone 1 Dusty Finke From:Michael Monahan <cousinspropertymgmt@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 9, 2022 1:36 PM To:Kathleen Martin; Dino Deslauriers; todd.alders@medinamn.gov; Robin Reid; Joseph Cavanaugh; Dusty Finke; Debra Dion; Brenda Ruth; Beth Nielsen; Braden Rhem; Ron Grajczyk; Justin Popp; Tim Sedabres; John Jacob Subject:500 Hamel Road Hi ‐ I am writing to you concerning the proposed apartment complex for 500 Hamel Road. As an apartment building owner myself I do not feel this is the proper place for an apartment building as people have spent a lot of money on their homes and this will bring down the value of these newer neighborhoods. You can see this with the townhomes that are built in the community as about 20% of the ones in the Enclave are now rental property. Additionally, section 8 people will be allowed in and are typically in newer buildings as they pass the state inspections much easier. As I was reading the master plan for Hamel I feel it does not fit the current structure. Along with this the master plan for Hamel states it will only increase its 17.5 acres of multifamily to 29.6 acres. As such when looking at making the increase the apartment complex should be part of newly developed areas that will have commercial, then apartments, then townhomes and lastly homes. This way everything is buffered correctly and when people purchase their homes the expectation has already been set as to how the neighborhood will be made up. This current stretch of land should be used to build businesses that will bring people together in downtown Hamel such as shopping, dining and some office space. I appreciate you taking the time to read over my concerns and recommendations and look forward to you turning down the proposed construction of the apartment complex. Best, Mike Monahan Owner of Cousins Property Management Medina Resident 1 Dusty Finke From:Karen Rathke <krathke1@aol.com> Sent:Wednesday, August 10, 2022 7:01 AM To:Beth Nielsen; Dusty Finke Subject:Apartment complex proposed 500 Hamel Road Beth and Dusty, I am writing to express my concern about this proposal and the impact on traffic and parking in the area. I live on Ridgeview Circle, in the neighborhood immediately south of this location. There is no public transportation in this area. As a result every apartment unit will need at least one vehicle. With many 2 and 3 bedroom units, the building can accommodate larger families, each who could have 3 or more vehicles. Overflow parking from residents and visitors would likely move into my neighborhood. We do not have sidewalks, and the children and dog walkers play and walk on the streets. This becomes a safety issue if there are cars parked on the road. Please convey my concern as you discuss this proposal. I am unable to attend the meeting this evening. Respectfully, Karen Rathke 485 Ridgeview Circle 763‐478‐6597 Krathke1@aol.com 1 Dusty Finke From:davidschubbe@aol.com Sent:Tuesday, August 9, 2022 4:39 PM To:Dusty Finke Subject:500 Hamel Road Apartment Concept Plan Mr. Dusty Finke – City of Medina Planning Commission Thank you for the opportunity to provide input on this issue. My name is David Schubbe, and I am an owner at Argent Parc condominium in Uptown Hamel. I had planned to speak to this issue at the Public Hearing on Wednesday, August 10. However, I understand that COVID masks are optional at this meeting, so am requesting that the message below be presented to the Planning Commission prior to the meeting. I know that over 15 years ago there was considerable concern about building a 3-story condo right in Uptown Hamel. But with help in the early years from Farmers State Bank of Hamel, we now have proud responsible owners in all 18 units at Argent Parc. We have owners who walk across the street for mass at St. Anne, and owners who volunteer at St. Anne, and Art to Heart. We have engaged the Dorweilers to mow our lawn and the DesLauriers to plow our snow. We have owners who volunteer their time to beautifully maintain our property and gardens. And recently, one of our families has contributed a bench along the south side of the Hamel Legion pathway in memory of their son. We are very grateful for the volunteers at Hamel fire and rescue who have come to our aid when called. We certainly feel part of Uptown Hamel, and our residents also provided input to the long-term vision for our community. We, the owners, chose to live in Hamel because of it’s unique small-town, up-town, feel. 97 rental units, rental, not owned homes, just down the street from Argent Parc would change all that. It would be in conflict with the small town, Uptown Hamel feel….and in conflict with the Hamel vision. On behalf of all owners at Argent Parc, and our friends along Hamel Road, and our friends who enjoy the path around the Hamel Legion Park, please DO NOT let this happen….Thank you Please acknowledge receipt of this email. 1 Dusty Finke From:Website Inquiries Sent:Tuesday, August 9, 2022 7:02 PM To:Dusty Finke Subject:FW: New submission from Contact Us Hi Dusty, This message came through the city inbox. In general, should I send comments like this to you or someone else? I just want to make sure I pass along the comments appropriately. Thanks, Caitlyn Walker City Clerk/Assistant to the City Administrator ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Gwenda Skiff <glskiff@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 2:01 PM To: Website Inquiries <city@medinamn.gov> Subject: New submission from Contact Us Name Gwenda Skiff Email glskiff@hotmail.com <mailto:glskiff@hotmail.com> Phone (763) 360‐6250 Comments City Council Members, I am against the proposed development of a 97 unit apartment complex to be built by Buchholz Properties at 500 Hamel Road in Hamel, MN. It will not be a positive addition to our community. If it passes, in future elections I will not cast my vote for any council member that agreed to allow the development. Sincerely, Gwenda Skiff 1 Dusty Finke From:Beverly Tellefson <littlebevies26@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, August 10, 2022 2:02 PM To:Dusty Finke Subject:proposed development at 500 Hamel Road Hi, Just want to give you my thoughts on that property. That is way to big, maybe if it was 2 stories and not one big building. So far everyone that wants to build there doesn't care about the people that live around there. It would not be something I would like to look at. Also the traffic would be terrible. We / I would like Hamel to feel like a small town. I grew up in Hamel and with all the housing it has taken away a lot of the charm. My mom still lives right by that section and I am there everyday. The apartment up in Hamel is way to big for the town, but we are stuck with it. What ever happened to when everyone that wanted to build had to have an acre or more? I know times are changing but all the houses going to is insane. And they are so close to each other with roads being to narrow. Thank you for letting me give you my input. Bev Tellefson Bea Pearson 465 Hamel Rd 1 Dusty Finke From:Jennifer Umphrey <jenniferumphrey@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, August 10, 2022 9:31 AM To:Beth Nielsen; Dusty Finke Subject:Proposal at 500 Hamel Road Beth and Dusty: At tonight's meeting, please reconsider the proposal for a 97 unit apartment complex at 500 Hamel Road. Moving to Medina 10 years ago, we were attracted to the small town feel of streets without curb, gutter or sidewalk with kids who play freely throughout the neighborhood and neighbors who become like friends. In approving this apartment complex, we are concerned about how the increased traffic will affect Hamel Road which is already a busy street without stoplights and our narrow Elm Creek drive as a pass through to churches and schools along the 101 route. Safety measures need to be assessed and accounted for before any large scale construction begins on the site ‐ not after it becomes a problem. I have also heard that the site is home to debris containing toxins and asbestos from the Medina Ballroom fire years ago. In a previous proposal to build fewer units that were to be built on slabs, the recommendation was to dig no more than 4 feet down ‐ how is that possible now with underground parking proposed? How will this affect the health and wellness of our entire Medina community? Lastly, there is some confusion around the approved units per acre in the area. Is it still 4 units per acre? If not, can you please send the meeting minutes of where it was approved to be increased to allow for a 97 unit complex? We appreciate all you do to keep our community healthy, safe, and growing! I believe we can find other solutions to aid in the growing and ensure we stay safe and healthy! Jennifer Umphrey 3441 Elm Creek Drive 612‐812‐4329 ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: megbert6912 (null) <megbert6912@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 12:09 PM To: Website Inquiries <city@medinamn.gov> Subject: Proposed development at 500 Hamel Rd Hi, My husband and I oppose this development at 500 Hamel Rd per the public hearing to be later today. Thank you Meg & Neil Wolfe Sent from my iPhone 1 Dusty Finke From:Website Inquiries Sent:Thursday, August 11, 2022 10:15 AM To:Dusty Finke Subject:FW: Note to Planning Commission Below are comments from a resident that could not attend the public hearing. Caitlyn From: Laura Sparks <lsparks@thesalesboard.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 4:57 PM To: Website Inquiries <city@medinamn.gov> Subject: Note to Planning Commission Solution Builders ‐ ThnAir Warning: Sender @lsparks@thesalesboard.com has never sent any emails to your organization. Please be careful before replying or clicking on the URLs. Report Phishing Mark Safe powered by Graphus® Dear Planning Commission: I understand that there is a public hearing tonight, August 10th at 7pm. I can’t make it there, so I wanted to share my concerns with you all regarding the proposed development at 500 Hamel Road. I have lived on Zircon Lane at the Villas at Copper Creek for the last 3 years, and I absolutely love the beauty and charm of the Hamel Community. It’s a hidden gem, with a small town feel, and I know that I speak for most of my neighbors…..we are very concerned about this proposed 97 unit apartment complex and how it would affect Hamel as we know it. Here are my concerns: I heard that the site contains buried debris containing toxins such as asbestos and arsenic o How could that affect the health of all of us in the community? This sounds very dangerous and not safe. I have heard that the estimated traffic would increase to 650+ trips daily on Hamel Road due to this proposed apartment complex o This is a dramatic traffic increase, which is obviously something that none of us want I have heard that 73 mature trees would be removed for this development, nearly 75% of the trees on the property o The removal of all of these beautiful mature trees is an example of humans making a decision to destroy our planet. I understand that this complex is 97 units. This is a massive, and just downright a terrible idea for downtown Hamel. Due to all of these concerns, I am 110% not on board with the proposed development at 500 Hamel Road. This could cause a lot of chaos and would have a negative impact on the lives of the current residents of Hamel. Many of us who are loyal to this city may end up wanting to leave. I certainly wouldn’t feel safe knowing that asbestos and 1 Dusty Finke From:Karin Baltzell <karinbaltzell@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, August 11, 2022 10:24 AM To:Dusty Finke Subject:Project on Hamel road Please do NOT vote for or allow the proposed 97 unit building to be built at 500 Hamel Road. I live in the Enclave which is located between Hunter Drive and Brockton Road. As it is, it is very very difficult for me to get onto Hamel road from either access road, Hunter Drive or Brockton Road. I have almost been T‐boned twice trying to get onto Hamel road. I can’t imagine what more traffic and more people will do to the traffic patterns and the safety of both drivers and pedestrians if this many people/cars are added to the already difficult ingress and egress onto any of these three roads. In addition, I believe that drivers coming off of Hwy 55 onto Sioux Drive will increase significantly. This is already a stop/turn area that is fraught with troubles and visual impairments. Please be aware that progress can be had, but not at the cost of safety to citizens that already live in the area. Do consider other forms of development for that plot of land. Thank you. Karin Baltzell 3095 Wild Flower Trail Medina, MN 55340 612‐889‐0017 2 arsenic is being dug up blocks away from my home. I hope and pray that you all will hear my concerns and my Hamel Neighbors concerns, and not move forward with this proposed development at 500 Hamel Road. Thank you, Laura Laura Sparks – General Manager Direct: 763‐231‐2921 | Cell: 763‐291‐7155 | LinkedIn Action Selling ‐ The Sales Board, Inc. 14505 21st Ave. North, Suite 206 Minneapolis, MN 55447 www.ActionSelling.com K:\017878-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-18 Submittal (Concept)\_2022-08-05 500 Hamel Rd Apt Site Concept Plan - Engineering Review.docx 7 0 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | S U I T E 3 0 0 | M I N N E A P O L I S , M N | 5 5 4 1 6 | 7 6 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | W S B E N G . C O M August 5, 2022 Mr. Dusty Finke City Planning Director City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: 500 Hamel Rd Apartment Site Concept Plan – Engineering Review City Project No. LF-22-327 WSB Project No. 017878-000 Dear Mr. Finke: WSB staff have reviewed the 500 Hamel Rd Apartment Site Concept Plan dated July 18, 2022. The plans propose to construct a 97-unit apartment building and related improvements at 500 Hamel Road. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina’s general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. Concept Site Plan & General 1. With preliminary plat submittal(s) provide the following: o Existing site/removal plans that includes topographic survey/information that extends 50 feet beyond the limits of the proposed development. Include additional topography south of the proposed public/shared access improvements. o More detailed grading, drainage, erosion control plans. Considerations for minimizing drainage into the underground parking area will be needed. o Utility plan/profile drawings for watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer. o Site plan containing more detailed information, notes, curbing around the parking lot/access drive, and signing/striping. o Sheet that includes the pertinent City Standards details or other details needed to construction the proposed improvements. o Typical section details for streets, trails, and sidewalks meeting the City’s standards, at minimum. The final pavement sections shall be designed by a registered geotechnical engineer for the specific soil conditions found on the site. 2. Provide a vehicle turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building structures and provide any required turn around space(s) as required by the City Fire Marshall. 3. The applicant will be required to install a bituminous trail along Hamel Road. See additional comments provided by the City Planner on pedestrian access and mobility requirements. 4. City staff will provide additional comments on the plat, tree preservation plan, and landscaping plans separately from this review. 500 Hamel Rd Apartment Site Concept Plan – Engineering Review August 5, 2022 Page 2 K:\017878-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-18 Submittal (Concept)\_2022-08-05 500 Hamel Rd Apt Site Concept Plan - Engineering Review.docx 5. The Remedial Investigation Report and Response Action Plan will need to be updated to accommodate the progress in the design and specifically the implications of excavating for proposed basements and utility depths. Consideration of bedding for utilities and foundations should be included with this report or as a separate evaluation (with the street design recommendations). An analysis of the quantity of contaminated material shall be provided along with any recommendations on how building foundations should be protected or sealed/waterproofed to provide long term protection from the contaminants. See additional comments within this review. 6. See marked up sketch plan for additional comments and easement considerations. Not all comments on the plans are detailed in this review letter. 7. The applicant will be required to install a bituminous trail along Hamel Road adjacent to the site and further east of the site to connect into the widened shoulder of Hamel Road . See additional comments provided by the City Planner on pedestrian access and mobility requirements. 8. The applicant will be required to widen Hamel Road, install concrete curb, and provide a parking lane on the north side. See additional comments provided by the City Planner on this item. 9. Retaining walls are being proposed on the plan. For walls greater than 4’ in height a design provided by a structural engineer will be required to be submitted for review. A safety fence will also be required for walls greater than 4’ in height. Erosion/Sediment Control / SWPPP 10. A full review of erosion/sediment control will be conducted with the final plat/construction plan submittal. Submit a SWPPP meeting all requirements 5.6-5.23 of the construction stormwater general permit. 11. An NPDES permit must be submitted to the City prior to start of construction. Water/Sewer Utilities 12. With future submittals show the existing sewer and watermain system in more detail including the nearest existing hydrants, valves, and manhole locations. Show proposed watermain, sanitary sewer mains, service locations, hydrants and valve locations. 13. Watermain looping connections will be needed to minimize long dead-end watermain sections. Consideration of further watermain looping needs and stubs for future phases or other adjacent developments will be required and reviewed with future submittals. With this in mind, at minimum the City will require that the internal site watermain is extended to the easterly property line with a stub and temporary hydrant. 14. Hydrant locations shall be approved of by the City Fire Marshall. Provide an exhibit of hydrant coverage with a maximum of 250’ radius. A review of valve locations will be provided with future plan submittals. 15. City’s typical standard is to place sewer a minimum of 10’ below the surface (18” vertical separation below the watermain). Where this depth is not feasible, the City will allow an 8’ depth; depths less than 8’ will require review on a case-by-case basis and require insulation and/or insulated pipe, at minimum. 16. The underlying fill conditions (various forms of debris from the demolition of a building) will require that a geotechnical evaluation is provided that includes a specific bedding/support evaluation of utility piping systems (watermain, sanitary sewer, and 500 Hamel Rd Apartment Site Concept Plan – Engineering Review August 5, 2022 Page 3 K:\017878-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-18 Submittal (Concept)\_2022-08-05 500 Hamel Rd Apt Site Concept Plan - Engineering Review.docx storm sewer). Buried debris can continue to break down over time causing settlements and otherwise provide poor foundation conditions. 17. Any public sanitary sewer and watermain shall be encompassed by drainage and utility easements where located outside of public road right of way. Drainage and utility easements will need to allow for a 1:1 trench from the invert of the utility with a minimum of 20’ centered on the utility. 18. Where any sewer pipe (storm or sanitary) crosses the watermain, include a note saying “Maintain 18-Inch Separation, 4” Rigid Insulation”. Provide dimension notes in various locations between the watermain and storm/sanitary sewer. 19. The watermain improvements will require approval from the MDH and/or MN DOLI. The sanitary sewer improvements will require a permit from the MPCA. Provide completed and approved permit documents with final construction plans. Civil Construction Details 20. Include typical section details for street, trail, sidewalk meeting the City’s standards. The final street section shall be designed by a registered geotechnical engineer for the specific soil conditions found on the site. 21. With final plat submittal, Include a typical section/design on the plans for the proposed retaining walls and safety fencing. 22. A full review of standard details will be conducted with final plat/construction plans. Traffic & Access 23. Based on the proposed site plan the anticipated traffic generation for a 98 -unit apartment development would be 661 daily trips, 40 AM peak hour trips and 50 PM peak hour trips. These trips would be added to the existing traffic on Hamel Road. The most resent daily traffic count on Hamel Road in this area is 2,500 from 2017. 24. Hamel Road adjacent to the site is a local Municipal State Aid Street. The existing roadway has a 25ft two lane rural cross section with no shoulders. The roadway has a posted 30mph speed limit. 25. One access driveway is proposed from the site across from Elm Creek Drive. With the proposed concentrated site traffic generation at one site access, an analysis was completed documenting if right and/or left turn lanes are needed usi ng criteria outlined in the MnDOT/LRRB Research Report 2008-14. This document outlines several criteria for turn lane warrants, including those found in the MnDOT Road Design Manual and the MnDOT Traffic Engineering Manual. The analysis was completed using the following assumptions. • 3,160 vehicles per day on Hamel Road (2,500 existing and 660 site traffic) • 316 PM peak hour vehicles on Hamel Road (10% of ADT) • 221 westbound vehicles (70%) and 95 eastbound vehicles (30%) • 50 PM peak hour site trips (32 in / 18 out) • 22 PM peak hour trips turning right into site (70%) • 10 PM peak hour trips turning left into site (30%) The figures below represent the criteria outlined for left turn lanes with major roadway speed of 30-35mph and for right turn lanes with various speeds for the major roadway. 500 Hamel Rd Apartment Site Concept Plan – Engineering Review August 5, 2022 Page 4 K:\017878-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-18 Submittal (Concept)\_2022-08-05 500 Hamel Rd Apt Site Concept Plan - Engineering Review.docx Based on the above analysis no left turn lane from Hamel Road would be warranted however, a right turn lane from Hamel Road would be warranted at the time the development is fully occupied. Additional analysis and discussion with the developer will be required to determine when and how this would be accomplished. 26. A sight line analysis should be completed at site driveway intersection on Hamel Road and included considerations for landscaping, parking, and monument sign locations, if applicable. A site distance analysis/exhibit was provided on the Landscape Plan (Sheet L2.1), but the site distance needs to accommodate a 30 MPH roadway per MnDOT design requirements as well as the proposed on-street parking. Stormwater Management 27. Provide a Stormwater Management plan meeting all requirements on the Medina Stormwater Design Guideline. 28. According to FEMA flood plain maps Zone AE 100-yr flood fringe encompasses much of this site. The floodplain elevation that applies to this parcel is 974.6. Please show floodplain elevation on future plan sets. The city requires compensatory storage at a 1:1 ratio for any filling the in the floodplain. Complete. 29. When this parcel split in 2018, there was floodplain fill on the eastern parcel that was not mitigated at that time. This fill amounts to 3,312 cf. Previous grading plans show this migration amount on the western parcel. This should be incorporated into th e site development plans; Add a label to where this is being proposed. 30. The development will need to meet the appropriate standards for Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission. Please submit approved permit information to the City. Confirm low floor/low opening requirements from Elm Creek Watershed to verify the structure meets all requirements. 31. The City requires two feet of freeboard from structure low openings to 100-year high water levels and EOF’s. The HWL of the adjacent basin is 983.26 and the EOF is 985. Therefore, the minimum low opening for adjacent structures is 987 32. Provide updated boring logs to verify soils around proposed buildings and stormwater BMP’s. Separation will be required from the adjacent wetland and floodplain. 500 Hamel Rd Apartment Site Concept Plan – Engineering Review August 5, 2022 Page 5 K:\017878-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-18 Submittal (Concept)\_2022-08-05 500 Hamel Rd Apt Site Concept Plan - Engineering Review.docx Volume Control 33. Per city of Medina standard 1.1 inches of runoff from net new impervious surfaces must be captured and retained onsite. Infiltration is required where feasible. Refer to design guide for additional credits. 34. This development drains to a regional wet pond/filtration basin system constructed in 2015. The regional basins were designed to meet rate control and water quality requirements for this site. The ponds were designed to assume that 80% (2.7 acres) of the buildable portion of this parcel would be impervious surface. Provide detailed impervious surface information for the proposed development to ensure that the proposed impervious is less than 2.7 acres. Any impervious not routed to the filtration basin will be required to be treated onsite. 35. Provide calculations of new impervious and how much is being treated by each BMP. Complete. Required Volume (ft^3) = Impervious Surfaces (SF) * 1.1 (in) * 1/12 (ft/in) Rate Control 36. Post development discharge rates must be less than or equal to existing conditions discharge rates for the 2-year (2.5-inch), 10-year (4.3-inch), and 100-year (7.3-inch) Atlas 14 MSE 3, 24-hour storm events. Complete. 37. Provide calculations of each discharge point from the site to verify that discharge rates are reduced. Water Quality 38. For new development, the water quality control standard shall be considered satisfied if the volume control standard has been satisfied. If it is infeasible to meet the volume control standard due to site constraints the proposed BMP will need to detain and treat sufficient volume of stormwater to achieve a phosphorus load reduction of 20% from existing conditions using and approved BMP. Modeling 39. Provide modelling to show existing conditions and proposed conditions for the site. In- progress, HydroCAD model provided, but will require updating to address remaining comments. Wetlands 40. The wetland is classified as a Manage 1 by the City of Medina and will require a 30 -foot average (20-foot minimum) buffer. The location of the upland buffer, including buffer monument signs, and revegetation plan must be shown on the site plan around the full extent of the wetland within the project parcels. The location of the buffer monuments must also be shown on the wetland buffer plan. Upland buffer zone markers must be placed at a minimum of one marker per lot at the upslope edge of the Upland Buffer Zone and then every 250 feet thereafter and on all common lot lines. A wetland buffer sign is needed at the northern most lot line adjacent to the rail right of way. Show this sign on the plans. Complete. 41. If either permanent or temporary impacts to wetlands are proposed, an approval from the Wetland Conservation Act will be required. 42. Wetland buffer vegetation must consist of acceptable natural vegetation and cannot contain turf grass. Show the proposed buffer vegetation on the plans. 500 Hamel Rd Apartment Site Concept Plan – Engineering Review August 5, 2022 Page 6 K:\017878-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-18 Submittal (Concept)\_2022-08-05 500 Hamel Rd Apt Site Concept Plan - Engineering Review.docx 43. Note that the property owner or homeowners’ association is responsible for maintaining the Upland Buffer Zones on their property. Environmental 44. In 2015/2016, WSB’s environmental team assisted with the Hamel Road Stormwater Pond project. The City obtained a permanent stormwater pond easement (the Easement Site) consisting of the land located immediately west of 500 Hamel Road (the Application Site). The Easement Site has never been developed. However, evidence of demolition debris dumping was identified at the Easement Site during environmental due diligence. Further, the Application Site was identified as a closed tank leak site (Leak #11595) indicating a leak has occurred from a tank system. Site closure does not mean the site is free of contamination. Investigations completed at the Easement Site identified buried debris consisted of brick, concrete, clay block, wood, metal, reinforced bars, pipe, carpeting, ceramic tile, and other miscellaneous materials. Analytical testing of the debris identified elevated concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) equivalents, arsenic, and copper above the industrial soil reverence values (SRV) in soil. Additionally, asbestos containing materials (ACM), consisting of multiple floor tile and floor tile mastic, was identified in the debris at the Easement Site. Further, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) impacts, consisting of acenaphthene, fluoranthene, fluorene, pyrene, BaP equivalents, and arsenic where identified in shallow groundwater at the Easement Site exceeding MDH drinking water standards. Consequently, WSB prepared a Response Action Plan (RAP) in preparation for the stormwater project, as well as enrolled the Easement Site into the MPCA’s Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) program. The Easement Site was assigned VIC ID VP32320. The RAP was approved by the MPCA and a No Association Determination (NAD) was issued to the City related to the identified non-petroleum contamination. During construction, WSB assisted with the screening and segregation of debris impacted soil at the Easement Site for the construction of two stormwater ponds. The purpose of the RAP was to screen and manage the contaminated media generated during the construction of the stormwater ponds, not to clean up the entire Easement Site. A total of 4,893 tons of asbestos containing waste material was excavated during pond construction and disposed offsite at Vonco II Landfill located in Becker, MN. Contaminated media (including buried asbestos and PAH impacted soil) still remains in place at the Easement Site beyond the project excavation limits. It was recommended that an affidavit or restrictive covenant be filed for the Easement Site because of the remaining contamination. It is unknown if an affidavit or restrictive covenant was filed. 45. The Application Site is located immediately east of the Easement Site which has documented contamination resulting from previous construction debris dumping. Further, construction debris dumping and contamination impacts to soil and groundwater remain in place at the Easement Site. It is unknown if construction debris dumping has occurred at the Application Site. However, it is recommended the environmental documents prepared for the Easement Site are provided to the Application Site team. Further, the Application Site is associated with a closed tank leak (Leak #11595). Therefore, the Application Site team should have a plan (e.g. RAP) to manage contaminated media encountered during construction and ensure proposed buildings are protected from soil vapor intrusion. 500 Hamel Rd Apartment Site Concept Plan – Engineering Review August 5, 2022 Page 7 K:\017878-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-18 Submittal (Concept)\_2022-08-05 500 Hamel Rd Apt Site Concept Plan - Engineering Review.docx The applicant has provided a RAP, but the original plan for the proposed homes was to construct them as a slab on grade to avoid disturbance of buried debris/garbage. The current submittal for final plat now shows the homes to have full basements requiring more significant disturbance of the underlying material. The Remedial Investigation Report and Response Action Plan will need to be updated to accommodate the progress in the design and specifically the implications of excavating for full basements. 46. In addition to generating more impacted soil due to deeper utilities, the deeper utility’s might also require dewatering during utility installations for this project since groundwater is 10-22 feet below grade. This may require a permit and some analytical sampling during the dewatering process. The RAP stated that the MPCA will be notified when a final groundwater dewatering plan is decided (if necessary). If dewatering is proposed, the applicant will need to move forward with this step. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards. We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet. Sincerely, WSB Jim Stremel, P.E. City Engineer To: The City of Medina From: Buchholz Properties LLC Re: 500 Hamel Road Development Narrative We are pleased to present you with a 97 unit development project at 500 Hamel Road, Medina, which will serve as a compliment to Uptown Hamel’s “blend of retail, office, specialty shops, and residential places.” The new development will provide vibrancy to the area and fulfill a demand for higher density residential within the community. In the process of designing the architectural elements of the building (and its orientation on the site), great attention was given to the surrounding properties, the community, and the surrounding architectural elements and nuances. In particular for this project, we gave great consideration to Uptown Hamel and its historical elements. We determined that Hamel has a scale ranging from one to three stories and traditional architecture. Hamel’s walkable streetscape is inviting to pedestrians and truly encapsulates the “Main Street '' feel that communities covet. We believe it is appropriate to capture the same timeless elements in the design of our project. The proposed design aesthetic features American colonial trim details with horizontal wood grain siding that is minimum maintenance. Main floor walk-out patios and covered porches with standing seam metal roofs will mesh with the main street of Uptown Hamel. A rhythm of gable roof peaks and a roof-top patio above the main entrance reduces the building ’s perceived scale by separating the building ’s facade into distinct sections while matching the proportions of traditional architecture. All residential parking will be hidden underground, while guest parking is concealed behind the building as a strategy to maintain the Uptown/Downtown streetscape. The development will allow for a soft transition from industrial to residential while providing sufficient unit density appropriate for this site. Thank you for the opportunity to discuss our concept, we truly appreciate the opportunity to work with your City to accomplish mutual goals. Best Regards, Mark Buchholz, President Buchholz Properties PH: 701-371-1646 E:mark@buchprop.com 1 Dusty Finke From:Mark Buchholz <mark@buchprop.com> Sent:Thursday, August 11, 2022 10:42 AM To:Dusty Finke Subject:500 Hamel Road Dusty, Medina Staff, and Medina City Commission: Good morning, we want to express our gratitude for the opportunity to discuss our company, our projects, and the vision for our site in Uptown Hamel. Last evening we had the opportunity to discuss our concept with the Planning and Zoning commission and the community. Throughout the meeting we were able to articulate our vision for the project, while carefully listening to commissioner and public feedback. We felt that process yielded some great feedback for consideration. Due to the constructive nature of the feedback, we felt it was appropriate to allow for the Council to provide guidance as well. We want to articulate that our development group has a desire to work with the City, the staff, and the community to create and execute a project and vision that is appropriate for the site and for the community. With the commission meeting happening next week, we will be unable to provide updated details based on the feedback received last evening. While we do plan to make changes to incorporate feedback in the future, we felt is is vital to continue to seek additional input from the Council prior to making additional changes. We also plan to engage the neighbors and concerned citizens by offering a developer workshop meeting. This will allow for additional time for their voices and concerns/feedback to be heard. Thank you for your consideration! We look forward to meeting you all soon. Mark Buchholz President Buchholz Properties 701‐371‐1646 Mark Hamel Roa d H u n t e r D r Sidewalk 10' Setba c k 30' Easem e n t ST ST SS MB MB TBX SS SSMH RE=983.9 MB H Y D HYD 981.56 SS SS TBX C H Y D HYD 975.90 SS MB SS SS SS HH 100-YR FLOODPLAIN ELEV. = 974.6 100-YR FLOODPLAIN ELEV. = 974.6 SS HOUSE OUT BLDG. -B I T U M I N O U S - -B I T U M I N O U S - REGIONAL FILTRATION BASIN #1 REGIONAL POND WETLAND #2 WETLAND PER DELINEATION PER JACOBSON ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC. DATED 6/15/2021 Abandoned VCP 100-YR FLOODPLAIN ELEV. = 974.6 HWL: 982.9 Existing Wet Basin 100 yr floodplain: 982.9 EOF: 982.6 Stormwater Basin EOF: 984.4 Railro a d 980 981 983 979 982 7.1 % Slope 985 988 X 988 X 992 99 0 990 991 992 9 8 0 9 7 5 99 0 98 9 988 984 99 1 99 2 990 986 987 989 985 89 0 979 980 981 982 983 98 4 X 984 Apartment Building FFE: 992 Low Opening 981 X X L.P. X H.P. X L.P. L.P. X X H.P. 89 6 990 986 990 985Sidewalk Flood p l a i n M i t i g a t i o n A r e a NORTH04080 Hamel Rd Apartments Medina, MN Site Plan and Concept Grading NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. __________________________________________________________________ 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Medina City Council FROM: Nate Sparks DATE: August 10, 2022 RE: 342 Hamel Road – Hamel Townhomes Final Plat CITY FILE: LR-22-326 BACKGROUND At the regular meeting of the Medina City Council on June 7, 2022, the Council considered and approved (subject to conditions) the preliminary plat and site and building plan applications of Hamel Townhomes, LLC for the “Hamel Townhomes.” The project overlays an approximate 2- acre site located at 342 Hamel Road and consists of 30 townhomes (within five buildings). At this time, Hamel Townhomes, LLC is seeking final plat approval of the subdivision. Consistent with the approved preliminary plat, the final plat consists of 30 townhome unit lots and an outlot which overlays common areas within the development. The site is located in the City’s UH, Uptown Hamel zoning district. PROJECT SITE The site currently covers two parcels of land. The westerly parcel measures 0.98 acres in size and has an existing house. The easterly parcel measures 1.17 acres in size and is vacant. The two parcels are owned in common. The site is located on the north side of Hamel Road and east of Hunter Drive. The site is immediately adjacent to the City’s Rainwater Nature Area, which is located to the west. There are single family homes on the south side of Hamel Road, which are zoned Urban Residential. To the east are six single family homes and property owned by St. Anne’s Church, which are zoned Uptown Hamel. The north boundary of the site is bordered by the Soo Line railroad tracks. The site slopes from the road to the tracks (south to north) approximately 16 feet. An aerial photograph of the subject site and surrounding property is provided below. Agenda Item #8B COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONING As noted as part of the previous preliminary plat review, the subject site is guided “Uptown Hamel” in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The “Uptown Hamel” land use category allows residential and commercial uses to be mixed on adjacent sites and to be mixed within the same building or property. Residential development in this designation may be between 4.0 and 15.0 units per acre. The property is zoned UH, Uptown Hamel District. This district states that the minimum lot area per dwelling unit is 2,904 square feet, which is 15 units per acre. According to the received survey, the subject site measures 2.141 acres in size. This allows for a range of 9 to 32 dwelling units on the site. Thus, the proposed number of dwelling units upon the site (30) is consistent with both the Comprehensive Plan and applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Consistent with the preliminary plat approval, the applicant is proposing the construction of 30 townhomes on the property (within five buildings), which results in a density of approximately 14 units per acre. The units are proposed as a mix of three and four bedrooms. Each unit is proposed with a two-car garage. The site is proposed to have two eight, one six, and two four- unit buildings. The four-unit buildings are facing Hamel Road with the others behind. FINAL PLAT APPLICATION REVIEW Final Plat Consistency with Approved Preliminary Plat The submitted final plat is consistent with the approval preliminary plat is terms of building, unit lot and internal street arrangements. Easements As a condition of preliminary plat approval, it was stipulated that drainage and utility easements must be provided as required by the City Engineer. The applicant has proposed that drainage and utility easements be granted over the entire Outlot (generally the entire area outside of the townhome lots). This provides the most flexibility for easements, but easements would be located under proposed retaining walls, which the City generally discourages. To avoid having walls within easements, small areas of the outlot could be excluded from the easement. Staff believes it is appropriate to accept easements over the entire Outlot and permit the walls to be within the easement. This provides more flexibility than trying to specify several “strips” of easements throughout the Outlot. Park Dedication The proposed townhome development does not include any park land dedication. As a condition of the preliminary plat approval, the applicant must satisfy the City’s park dedication requirements via cash contrition in-lieu of a land dedication. Specifically, it was determined that the applicant must pay park dedication fee in lieu of land dedication in an amount $3,500 per lot for a total of $98,000. Tree Preservation As a condition of preliminary plat approval, the applicant is required to satisfy the tree preservation requirements of the City. Specifically, the applicant must provide off-site planting or a contribution of $100 per inch to the City’s reforestation and woodland management fund. The applicant has revised their landscaping plan to include more plantings. Upon review of the landscaping plan, the plantings in the northeast were found to be too dense, located in a drainage swale, and would interfere with private improvements on the unit lots. The spacing of the trees in this area should be increased to 1 tree for every 10 feet with the cedar and pine, which would be reduction of about 3 trees (10.5 inches). The street trees are also planted in too great of depth for the area and the trees provided along the street may not be the most appropriate for a street planting. These trees should be decreased to be less than 1 tree for every 20 feet, which would be a reduction of three trees (6 inches). The boulevard trees should be maple or oak trees in addition to the coffee trees. In total, this would be a reduction in 16.5 inches of provided trees. Therefore, the required tree replacement would be 219.5 inches or $21,950. Homeowners Association Documents As a condition of preliminary plat approval, it was stipulated that the applicant must submit homeowner association documents for review and approval by the City Attorney. Staff recommends that this condition be carried forward as a condition of final plat approval. Development Agreement As a condition of final plat approval, the applicant must enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include the conditions of final plat approval as well as other requirements of the City Ordinance or policy. FINAL SITE AND BUILDING PLAN COMMENTS Submission Requirement As a condition of previous site and building plan approval, the applicant was required to submit a final site and building plan set in conjunction with the final plat application. While this condition has been satisfied, it is necessary to determine whether required plan changes (imposed as conditions of previous site and building plan approval) have been made and also identify any other issues of potential concern. The conditions of site and building approval state that snow storage must not occur within designated vehicle backing areas and that provision must be made for disposing snow in an off-site location. Vehicle Circulation As a condition of site and building plan approval, it was stipulated that driveway orientations must be updated to better accommodate vehicle backing maneuvers for townhome units located in the northwest and northeast corners of the site. It was further indicated that site circulation must be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and Fire Marshal. While designated vehicle “backing areas” are not provided near the northwest and northeast townhome units, ample area does exist within the internal loop street to allow for necessary backing and turning movements. Not enough area exists to allow for both vehicle circulation and the parking of vehicles in front of Building A and Building B garages. As a result, Staff recommends that driveway parking in front of Building A and Building B garages not be allowed, and that signage be erected which conveys such requirement. This should be included in a final signage plan. Exterior Building Materials In consideration of the previously submitted building elevations, a condition was imposed that exterior building materials must be consistent with the requirements of Uptown Hamel and with the architectural plans dated May 10, 2022 (4-plexes) and April 29, 2022. The updated plan set dated June 30, 2022 includes additional detail related to exterior finish materials. In this regard, townhome buildings are to be finished in a mixture of vertical and horizonal siding (LP Smartside) which is to be white in color. The back of the front porch areas along Hamel Road will be finished in brick (white in color). The applicant has provided a more articulated front end with individual entrances into the units, as requested by the City Council during the preliminary plat review. While proposed finish materials meet the requirements of the Ordinance, final architectural plans shall be subject to review and approval by City Staff prior to issuance of permits. Garages The conditions of site and building plan approval state that townhome garages must not be less than 400 square feet in size. According to the submitted site plan, the townhome garages measure 18’-9” in width and 21 feet in depth (400 square feet in size). While the proposed garages meet the minimum area requirement, it should be recognized that such garage dimensions will likely be very limiting for larger vehicles such as pickup trucks and hinder door swings (an average pickup truck measures 20 feet in depth and 7 feet in width). Guest Parking As a condition of site and building plan approval, it was indicated that guest parking stalls must not be less than 9’ x 19’ in size. The eight guest parking stalls located along the north property line of the subject site meet the minimum dimensional requirement of the Ordinance. Staff had recommended that the applicant participate in a right-of-way project to increase parking opportunities for the south end of the development with City participation. The applicant has not elected to do so. Dog Waste Station As required, the site plan has been modified to include a dog waste station. The waste station is located subject site’s northern boundary. A specification for this has been provided. Solid Waste Disposal As a condition of site and building plan approval, the applicant must submit a solid waste plan to the satisfaction of the service provider for trash and recycling pickup activities. All materials and facilities for trash and recycling activities must be kept inside the townhome buildings. Lighting As required, photometric lighting plan has been submitted for review. In compliance with City lighting requirements, the lighting plan specifies a footcandle reading of zero lumens along all property lines. As a condition of site plan approval, a lighting plan must meet all applicable City Code requirements. Landscaping The Uptown Hamel District requires that at least five percent of the site be devoted to a plaza or be landscaped. Landscaping must consist of a combination of decorative deciduous and coniferous trees, shrubs, flowers, ground covers and rain gardens. Landscaped areas and pockets shall be delineated and separated by any of the following: curbing, decorative fencing, decorative walls, planter boxes, containers, “cut outs” in a plaza, or by similar means. All that part of the site not taken up by buildings, walks, or plazas or approved parking and loading must be landscaped. Like the previously approved site plan, 82 percent of the site is to be impervious surface. Thus, 18 percent of the site is to be devoted to landscaped area. As previously indicated, the landscape plan is considered well-conceived and should contribute to the attractiveness of the townhome project (as conditioned regarding the comments involving the replacement trees). Fencing As a condition of previous site and building plan approval, it was stipulated that all site fencing must comply with Ordinance requirements. As part of previous site plan review, a chain link fence was proposed around the dog exercise area located along the site’s north boundary. It was further noted that a chain link fence such as that proposed does not meet Ordinance requirements. While a 6-foot-high wooden fence has been proposed along the north boundary of the exercise area, the type of fence along the exercise area’s three other boundaries is not clear. This should be clarified by the applicant. The type, height and location of fencing which is to be utilized on the site must comply with the City requirements. REVIEW CRITERIA The City’s subdivision ordinance requires that a final plat review involves a determination of whether conditions of preliminary plat approval have been satisfied. According to Section 820,23, Subd. 2 of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance, the final plat shall have incorporated all changes recommended by the City Council and the City Engineer, but in all other respects it shall conform to the preliminary plat as approved. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the preceding review, Planning Staff recommends the following actions: 1. Move to adopt the resolution granting final plat approval of the Hamel Townhomes subdivision. 2. Move to approve the development agreement by and between the City of Medina and Hamel Townhomes LLC ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution 2. Development Agreement 3. Engineering Comments dated 7/15/2022 4. Final Plat 5. Hamel Townhomes Civil Plan Set dated 8/2/22 6. Hamel Townhomes Architectural Plan Set dated 6/30/22 7. Lighting Plan dated 7/8/22 Member ________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION 2022-__ RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT FOR A SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS “HAMEL TOWNHOMES” WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Hamel Townhomes, LLC (the “Applicant”) has made an application for a final plat for the subdivision of land (the “Property”) legally described as: That part of Lot 18 Auditor’s Subdivision No. 241, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on Northerly line of Rockford Road distant 552.5 feet Northwesterly from Southwest corner of Lot 16, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 241, said point to be known as Point “A”, thence Northwesterly along said Northerly road line distant 175 feet, thence Northeasterly parallel with Northwesterly line of said Lot 16 to Southerly right-of-way line of Soo Line Railroad, thence Southeasterly along said right-of-way line distant 80 feet to actual point of beginning; thence Southerly to said point “A”; thence Southeasterly along said Northerly road line distant 115 feet; thence Northeasterly parallel with Northwesterly line of said Lot 16, to Southerly right-of-way line of said Railroad; thence Northwesterly along said right-of-way line to beginning. and That part of Lot 18 Auditor’s Subdivision No. 241, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point where the Northwesterly line of Lot 16, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 241 intersects the Northeasterly right-of-way line of the Rockford Road; thence Northwesterly along said right-of-way line 552.5 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continuing Northwesterly along said right-of-way line 175.0 feet; thence Northeasterly parallel with the Northwesterly line of said Lot 16 a distance of 323.6 feet more or less to the Southwesterly right- of-way line of the Soo Line Railroad; thence Southeasterly along said railroad right-of-way line 80.0 feet; thence Southerly to the point of beginning. WHEREAS, on June 7, 2022, the City granted preliminary approval to the Applicant to subdivide the 2.1 acre Property into 30 townhome lots; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the final plat at the August 16, 2022 meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found that, subject to the terms and conditions contained herein, the plat is substantially consistent with the approved preliminary plat and the requirements of the City’s subdivision regulations. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby grants final plat approval for Hamel Townhomes, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement as drafted by the City which shall include the requirements described below as well as other relevant requirements of City ordinance or policy. 2. The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated August 5, 2022, except as may be modified herein. 3. The Applicant shall address the comments of the City Engineer in the letter dated July 15, 2022. 4. All dedicated easements shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 5. The Applicant shall pay a park dedication fee in lieu of land dedication in an amount of $98,000. 6. The Applicant shall satisfy the significant tree replacement requirements of the City by planting trees as depicted in the plans, subject to modifications indicated by City Staff, and by providing additional off-site planting of 219.5 inches of trees or a contribution of $100 per inch to the City’s reforestation and woodland management fund ($21,950). The off-site planting/contribution shall be adjusted if proposed number or size of on-site planting is adjusted or as otherwise appropriate to meet ordinance standards. 7. All materials and facilities for trash and recycling activities shall be kept inside the townhome buildings. 8. The lighting plan shall meet all applicable City Code requirements. All lighting, including patio lighting, shall be downcast and shielded. 9. All fencing and enclosures on the site shall meet City Code requirements. 10. The Applicant shall submit homeowner association documents for review and approval by the City Attorney. 11. The Applicant shall obtain all permits required by Elm Creek Watershed District, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council and any other relevant agencies. 12. The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site improvements to ensure completion. 13. The Applicant shall execute and record a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney to describe the responsibility of the property owners to maintain the private stormwater improvements. 14. The Applicant shall execute and record a Private Road Maintenance and Easement Agreement in a form and substance acceptable to the City Attorney to describe the responsibilities of the property owners to maintain the private road and the City requirements related thereto. 15. The Applicant shall abide by the comments and recommendations of the City Attorney related to the plat opinion, title issues and recording procedures. 16. The final plat shall be recorded within 180 days of the date of this resolution or this approval shall be considered void, unless a written request for a time extension is submitted by the Applicant and approved by the City Council for good cause. 17. All fees incurred by the City regarding the processing and review of this application shall be paid by the Applicant, including the drafting and review of relevant agreements and documents and the review of construction plans. Dated August 16, 2022. By: ______________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: By: ___________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _______ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. ME230-781-813142.v4 DRAFT 8/10/22 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MEDINA AND HAMEL TOWNHOMES, LLC FOR HAMEL TOWNHOMES This document drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 ME230-781-813142.v4 i TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. Right to Proceed ................................................................................................................1 2. Plans; Improvements .........................................................................................................2 3. Erosion Control .................................................................................................................3 4. Site Grading ......................................................................................................................3 5. Construction of Subdivision Improvements .....................................................................4 6. Private Road ......................................................................................................................4 7. Hamel Road Restoration ...................................................................................................5 8. Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements.........................................................................5 9. Stormwater Improvements ................................................................................................5 10. Signage and Lighting ........................................................................................................6 11. Sidewalk; Retaining Walls ................................................................................................6 12. Landscaping Plan; Landscape Irrigation System; Tree Removal .....................................7 13. Letter of Credit ..................................................................................................................7 14. Homeowners’ Association ................................................................................................8 15. Park Dedication Requirements .........................................................................................8 16. Responsibility for Costs; Escrow for Construction Inspection .........................................8 17. Developer’s Default ..........................................................................................................9 18. Insurance ...........................................................................................................................9 19. No Building Permits Approved; Certificates of Occupancy...........................................10 20. Clean up and Dust Control ..............................................................................................10 21. Compliance with Laws ...................................................................................................10 22. Agreement Runs with the Land ......................................................................................10 23. Indemnification ...............................................................................................................10 24. Assignment .....................................................................................................................10 25. Notices ............................................................................................................................11 26. Severability .....................................................................................................................11 27. Non-waiver .....................................................................................................................11 28. Estoppel Certificate; Partial Release ...............................................................................11 29. Counterparts ....................................................................................................................12 SIGNATURES ........................................................................................................................... 13-14 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY EXHIBIT B LIST OF PLAN DOCUMENTS EXHIBIT C FORM OF PRIVATE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT EXHIBIT D FORM OF STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT EXHIBIT E SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE ME230-781-813142.v4 1 This Development Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___ day of _____________, 2022 by and between the city of Medina, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota (the “City”), and Hamel Townhomes, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer is fee owner of the real property legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”) and desires to develop the Property with 30 residential townhome units; and WHEREAS, to accommodate the proposed development, the City conditionally approved a site and building plan review, via Resolution 2022-XX, and the final plat of Hamel Townhomes (the “Subdivision”), via Resolution 2022-XX, WHEREAS, Resolution 2022-XX and Resolution 2022-XX shall be collectively referred to herein as the “City Approvals”; and WHEREAS, the final plat approval for the Subdivision is contingent upon the Developer entering into a development agreement satisfactory to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the mutual covenants and obligations contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Right to Proceed. The Property is approximately 2.141 acres in size and the Subdivision consists of 30 lots intended for residential townhome purposes. The Developer may not construct public or private improvements or any buildings within the Subdivision or otherwise contemplated herein until all the following conditions precedent have been satisfied: a) the final plat of Hamel Townhomes has been filed with Hennepin County; b) this Agreement has been executed by the Developer and the City; c) the required Letter of Credit (as hereinafter defined) has been received by the City from or on behalf of the Developer; d) final engineering and construction plans in digital form have been submitted by the Developer and approved by the city engineer; e) the Developer has reimbursed the City for all legal, engineering and administrative expenses incurred to date by the City regarding the Subdivision and has given the City the additional escrow required by this Agreement; f) the Developer has executed the Private Road Maintenance and Easement Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C; g) the Developer has executed the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D; h) a storm sewer improvement tax district has been established for the Property ME230-781-813142.v4 2 and the Developer has submitted the storm sewer improvement tax district disclosure statement required by section 9 of this Agreement; i) the Developer has made all payments to the City for tree preservation and park dedication; j) the Developer has submitted and the City has approved the certified grading plan; k) all erosion control measures are in place; l) the Developer has received all required permits from the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and any other entity having jurisdiction; m) the Developer or the Developer’s engineer has initiated and attended a preconstruction meeting with the city engineer and staff; and n) the City has issued a notice that all conditions precedent have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. The City shall promptly issue such notice upon satisfaction of all conditions precedent and shall not unreasonably withhold its certification that the conditions precedent have been satisfied. 2. Plans; Improvements. a) The Developer agrees to develop the Subdivision in accordance with this Agreement, the final plat of Hamel Townhomes, the City’s engineering standards, and the terms and conditions of the City Approvals, which are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement and made a part hereof. The Developer also agrees to construct all required improvements related to the Subdivision in accordance with the approved engineering and construction plans (collectively, the “Plans”). The documents which constitute the Plans are those on file with and approved by the City and are listed on Exhibit B attached hereto. The Plans may not be modified by the Developer without the prior written approval of the City, not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. b) In developing the Subdivision in accordance with the Plans, the Developer shall make or install at its sole expense the following public and private improvements (collectively, the “Subdivision Improvements”): 1. site grading and erosion controls; 2. sanitary sewer; 3. municipal water distribution system; 4. private road, street lighting, and signage; 5. public sidewalk; 6. street restoration on Hamel Road; 7. stormwater facilities; and 8. landscaping. c) All work performed by or on behalf of the Developer on or related to the Subdivision, including construction of the Subdivision Improvements and construction of houses on the lots, shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m. on Saturday. ME230-781-813142.v4 3 d) All vehicles, equipment, and materials accessing or being hauled or delivered to the Subdivision during construction shall access the Property using Hamel Road west of the Property to County Road 115 (Pinto Drive). Construction vehicles, equipment, and materials may not utilize Hamel Road east of the Property. The established haul route and other requirements contained in this paragraph may be modified in writing by the Medina Public Works Director, in his sole discretion. 3. Erosion Control. a) All construction regarding the Subdivision Improvements shall be conducted in a manner designed to control erosion and in compliance with all City ordinances and other requirements, including the City’s permit with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding municipal separate storm sewer system program. Before any portion of the Property is rough graded, an erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer as approved by the City. The City may impose reasonable, additional erosion control requirements after the City’s initial approval if the City deems such necessary due to a change in conditions. All areas disturbed by the excavation shall be reseeded promptly after the completion of the work in that area unless construction of streets or utilities, buildings or other improvements is anticipated immediately thereafter. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. b) If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems reasonably appropriate to control erosion based on the urgency of the situation. The City agrees to provide reasonable notice to the Developer in advance of any proposed action, which shall be in writing, but may be by telephone or email in the case of emergencies, and limited notice by the City when conditions so dictate will not affect the Developer’s obligations or the City’s rights hereunder. c) The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all expenses it incurs in accordance with this Agreement in connection with any action it takes to control erosion. No grading or construction of the Subdivision Improvements will be allowed and no building permits will be issued within the Subdivision unless the Developer is in full compliance with the erosion control requirements. The erosion control measures specified in the Plans or otherwise required within the Property or adjacent areas shall be binding on the Developer and its successors and assigns. 4. Site Grading. To construct the Subdivision Improvements and otherwise prepare the Property for development, it will be necessary for the Developer to grade the Property based on the approved Plans and specifications for the Subdivision. All site and other grading must be done in compliance with the Plans. The City may withhold issuance of a building permit for any structure within the Subdivision until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City. Within 30 days after completion of the grading, or such other period acceptable to the City’s engineer, the Developer shall provide the City with an “as constructed” grading plan and a certification by a registered land surveyor or engineer. ME230-781-813142.v4 4 5. Construction of Subdivision Improvements. a) All Subdivision Improvements shall be installed in accordance with the Plans, the City Approvals, the City’s subdivision regulations, the City’s engineering standards for utility construction (as hereinafter defined) and the requirements of the report from the City engineer dated _____________, 2022. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications for the Subdivision Improvements prepared by a registered professional engineer. The Developer shall obtain any necessary permits from the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, Hennepin County, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Metropolitan Council, and any other agency having jurisdiction over the Subdivision before proceeding with construction. The City shall inspect all work at the Developer’s expense. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City’s inspectors. Prior to beginning construction, the Developer or the Developer’s engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting with all parties concerned, including the City staff and engineers, to review the program for the construction work. b) Within 60 days after the completion of the Subdivision Improvements, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible “as constructed” plans and three complete sets of paper “as constructed” plans, each prepared in accordance with City standards and in AutoCAD format based on Hennepin County coordinates. Stormwater “as constructed” plans shall also be submitted to the City in GIS format compatible with ArcMap 10.3 in the coordinates and with the attributes directed by the City engineer. Iron monuments must be installed in the Subdivision in accordance with state law. The Developer’s surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. Subject to events of force majeure, all Subdivision Improvements required by this Agreement shall be completed by no later than October 31, 2023 except as may be specifically noted otherwise in this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Private Road is constructed with bituminous instead of concrete, the final wear course of bituminous on the Private Road, as defined herein, shall be completed by no later than August 31, 2025 and in no event prior to the occurrence of at least one seasonal freeze-thaw cycle. c) No building permit shall be issued for structures within the Subdivision until adequate street access is available to the lot in question and the sanitary sewer and municipal water distribution system serving the lot has been fully constructed. If building permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of all Subdivision Improvements serving any lot, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of the Subdivision Improvements and damage to the Subdivision Improvements caused by the City, the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents, or third parties. No temporary or permanent certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any structure within the Subdivision until all street access, except for the final wear course of bituminous, and all proper utilities have been completed for the lot in question. 6. Private Road. The Developer agrees to construct a private road over a portion of Outlot A of the Subdivision to serve the lots in the Subdivision (the “Private Road”). The Private Road shall remain private and shall be maintained by the Developer or by the HOA, as hereinafter defined. Additionally, the Developer agrees to enter into a separate private road maintenance and easement agreement, the form of which is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit C, to ensure ongoing maintenance of the Private Road and to provide the City with necessary access to the ME230-781-813142.v4 5 Private Road. The Private Road shall be constructed and the private road maintenance and easement agreement shall be executed and recorded prior to the sale of any lots within the Subdivision or the issuance of any building permits related thereto. The Developer acknowledges that i) the Private Road will not be accepted by the City; ii) the City does not plan to maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or replacement of the Private Road and that the Developer initially and the HOA ultimately will have responsibility for such work; iii) the City has the right but not the obligation to perform necessary work upon the failure or refusal by the Developer or the HOA to do so; and iv) if the City performs any work on the Private Road, the City has the right to specially assess or otherwise recover the cost of such work against the lots within the Development that are served by the Private Road. The Developer agrees to inform purchasers of lots served by the Private Road that i) the City does not plan to maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or replacement of the Private Road and that the HOA will have primary responsibility for such work; ii) the City has the right but not the obligation to perform necessary work upon the failure or refusal by the HOA to do so; and iii) if the City performs any work on the Private Road, the City intends to recover the cost of such work from the owners of the lots served by the Private Road. To ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles, no vehicular parking shall be allowed on the Private Road’s paved road surface, and the HOA covenants must include language prohibiting such parking. 7. Hamel Road Restoration. As part of the Subdivision Improvements, the Developer agrees to restore and improve all portions of Hamel Road adjacent to the Property that are disturbed during construction of the Subdivision. Said improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Plans, shall meet all City requirements and specifications, and upon completion and acceptance by the City will be dedicated to the City as public improvements. 8. Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements. The Developer agrees to construct sanitary sewer and water improvements to serve the Development. The Developer’s work in constructing and extending the utilities must be in accordance with the Plans and must comply with all City requirements regarding such utilities. All extensions of public sewer and water main necessary to serve the Subdivision and located within platted drainage and utility easements will, by operation of contract, be dedicated by the Developer to the City as public improvements upon satisfactory completion and acceptance by the City. 9. Stormwater Improvements. a) The Developer agrees to construct the stormwater facilities in accordance with the Plans and in compliance with all City requirements regarding such improvements. The stormwater facilities include but are not limited to the underground stormwater filtration basin and associated pipes, together with all related facilities, as shown on the Plans, which discharge into a City-owned and operated stormwater pond. b) The on-site stormwater facilities serving the Subdivision will remain private and will be maintained by the Developer at its sole expense until taken over by the HOA, as hereinafter defined. The City does not intend to accept the stormwater facilities as public and does not intend to maintain them. In order to meet the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission and City code, the Developer agrees to enter into a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement with the City in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D. The purpose of the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement is to ensure that the Developer maintains the stormwater facilities and to give the City the ME230-781-813142.v4 6 right but not the obligation to do so if the Developer fails in its obligations. The Stormwater Maintenance Agreement will be recorded against all land within the Subdivision and will run with the land. The Developer acknowledges that i) the stormwater facilities have not and will not be accepted by the City; ii) the City does not plan to maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or replacement of the stormwater facilities and that the Developer and ultimately the HOA will have primary responsibility for such work; iii) the City has the right but not the obligation to perform necessary work upon the failure or refusal by the Developer or HOA to do so; and iv) if the City performs any work on the stormwater facilities, the City intends to specially assess or otherwise recover the cost of such work against the lots within the Subdivision. c) The Developer will make the HOA responsible for the maintenance, repair or replacement of the stormwater facilities as needed and the HOA documents recorded with Hennepin County shall so require. The HOA shall thereafter be responsible for the maintenance, repair or replacement of all on-site stormwater facilities serving the Subdivision. The Developer agrees to inform purchasers of lots within the Subdivision that i) the City does not plan to maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or replacement of the stormwater facilities and that the HOA will have primary responsibility for such work; ii) the City has the right but not the obligation to perform necessary work upon the failure or refusal by the HOA to do so; and iii) if the City performs any work on the stormwater facilities, the City intends to recover the cost of such work against the lots within the Subdivision. d) The Developer acknowledges that the City intends to establish a storm sewer improvement tax district which includes all land within the Subdivision. The district will be established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 444.16 to 444.21 and will authorize the City to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain, and otherwise improve storm sewer systems and related improvements within or serving the Subdivision if such work becomes necessary in the opinion of the City. In recognition of this possibility, the Developer agrees to provide prospective lot purchasers with a disclosure statement informing them of the existence of the storm sewer improvement tax district and that a tax could be imposed on the lots within the Subdivision if the City is required to repair or maintain the storm sewer systems and related improvements. The wording of the disclosure statement must be approved by the City for use in connection with the sale of lots in the Subdivision prior to its distribution or use by the Developer. 10. Signage and Lighting. The Developer agrees to install street lighting and signage serving the Subdivision at its sole cost, all in accordance with the Plans and City standards. All street lighting and signage required by the City shall be subject to City review and approval. On- site signage must include, but is certainly not limited to, no parking signs behind the townhome units located in Blocks 1 and 2 to ensure adequate access and circulation for, among other users, emergency vehicles. The Developer and eventually the HOA will be required to maintain, repair, and replace, as necessary, all lighting fixtures and signage that are internal to the Subdivision and not located along public right-of-way. 11. Sidewalk; Retaining Walls. a) The sidewalk along Hamel Road shall be constructed by the Developer in accordance with the Plans. Any sidewalks or pedestrian areas located within Outlot A shall be privately owned and maintained by the Developer and eventually the HOA. The City shall have no obligation to maintain, repair, or replace such areas. The public sidewalk located ME230-781-813142.v4 7 along Hamel Road shall be publicly owned and maintained following its satisfactory construction by the Developer and acceptance by the City. b) All retaining walls located within the Subdivision shall be constructed by the Developer in accordance with the Plans. Said retaining walls will be privately owned and maintained by the Developer and eventually the HOA, irrespective of their specific location within the Subdivision, and in no event shall the City be responsible for maintaining, repairing, or replacing any such retaining walls. 12. Landscaping Plan; Landscape Irrigation Plan; Tree Removal. a) The Developer agrees to install all landscaping in accordance with the Plans, which shall include all tree replacement requirements as provided in the City’s tree replacement ordinance to the extent applicable. All landscaping shall include hardy, non-invasive and drought tolerant species appropriate for Minnesota. All landscaping materials shall be maintained and replaced if they die within two years of installation. b) Due to the amount of tree removal on the Property required to accommodate the proposed development, the Developer is required to provide for the replacement of 528 inches of trees pursuant to the City’s tree preservation ordinance and the City Approvals. The Plans currently provide for the replacement of 303.5 inches of trees. Therefore, the Developer shall also contribute $21,950 ($100 per remaining 219.5 inches) to the City’s reforestation and woodland management fund prior to the City’s release of the final plat. If it is determined that site conditions will not allow for the replacement plantings contemplated above, the Developer shall, at the City’s request, make an additional monetary contribution to the City’s reforestation and woodland management fund, at the established rate of $100 per inch, to ensure adherence with the City’s tree preservation ordinance. 13. Letter of Credit. a) In order to ensure completion of the Subdivision Improvements required under this Agreement and satisfaction of all fees due to the City, the Developer agrees to deliver to the City prior to beginning any construction or work within the Subdivision a letter of credit (the “Letter of Credit”) in the amount of $______________, which represents 150 percent of the estimated cost of the Subdivision Improvements as specified in the Plans. This amount represents the maximum risk exposure for the City, based on the anticipated sequence of construction and the estimate of cost of each element of the Subdivision Improvements, rather than the aggregate cost of all required Subdivision Improvements. The Letter of Credit shall be delivered to the City prior to beginning any work on the Subdivision Improvements and shall renew automatically thereafter until released by the City. The estimated cost of the work covered by the Letter of Credit is itemized on Exhibit E attached hereto. The Letter of Credit shall be issued by a bank reasonably determined by the City to be solvent and creditworthy and shall be in a form acceptable to the City. The Letter of Credit shall allow the City to draw upon the instrument, in whole or part, in order to complete construction of any or all of the Subdivision Improvements and other specified work within the Subdivision and to pay any fees or costs due to the City by the Developer. b) The City agrees to reduce the Letter of Credit to an amount roughly equal to 150 percent of the cost of the remaining work, subject to evaluation of the City’s maximum risk exposure and satisfaction of all of the Developer’s financial obligations to the City. The Letter of Credit shall be released in full and returned to the Developer following full completion of all ME230-781-813142.v4 8 Subdivision Improvements in conformance with the Plans, including, but not limited to, the installation of the final wear course of bituminous on the Private Street if bituminous is used; after satisfaction of all financial obligations by the Developer to the City; and after completion of all other requirements of this Agreement. Prior to releasing any portion of the Letter of Credit or accepting another letter of credit in replacement, the City shall first be satisfied regarding the quality and completeness of the work and that the Developer has taken such steps as may be necessary to ensure that no liens will attach to the Subdivision. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Letter of Credit shall not be reduced to less than $50,000, until such time as the City releases the entire Letter of Credit. c) It is the intention of the parties that the City at all times have available to it a Letter of Credit in an amount adequate to ensure completion of all elements of the Subdivision Improvements and other obligations of the Developer under this Agreement. To that end and notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, all requests by the Developer for a reduction or release of the Letter of Credit shall be evaluated by the City in light of that principle. d) If at any time the City reasonably determines that the bank issuing the Letter of Credit no longer satisfies the City’s requirements regarding solvency and creditworthiness, the City shall notify the Developer and the Developer shall provide to the City within 30 days a substitute Letter of Credit from another bank meeting the City’s requirements. If within 30 days of notice the Developer fails to provide the City with a substitute Letter of Credit from an issuing bank satisfactory to the City, the City may draw under the existing Letter of Credit. 14. Homeowners’ Association. a) The Developer agrees to establish a homeowners’ association (the “HOA”), which shall include all land within the Subdivision. The Developer agrees to record covenants against said land for this purpose, which covenants must be in form and substance acceptable to the City. The covenants shall be filed by the Developer with Hennepin County prior to any building permits being issued for the Subdivision. b) The HOA covenants must provide, among other things, for HOA maintenance of the Private Road, internal sidewalks and pedestrian areas, internal street lighting and signage, on- site stormwater facilities, and all retaining walls located within the Subdivision. The HOA covenants must also prohibit vehicular parking on the paved surface of the Private Road and provide the HOA with an ability to strictly enforce such prohibition. The City must approve the HOA covenants and will require that certain provisions thereof may not be amended or deleted without prior written City approval. 15. Park Dedication Requirements. In order to satisfy the City’s park dedication requirements with respect to the Subdivision, the Developer shall pay to the City a cash-in-lieu amount of $98,000 prior to the City’s execution and release of the final plat. 16. Responsibility for Costs; Escrow for Construction Inspection. a) The Developer agrees to pay to the City an administrative fee in the amount necessary to reimburse the City for its reasonable costs and expenses in reviewing the Subdivision, including the drafting and negotiation of this Agreement and all associated documents. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City in full for such reasonable costs within 45 days after notice in writing by the City. The Developer ME230-781-813142.v4 9 agrees to reimburse the City for the reasonable cost incurred in the enforcement of any provision of this Agreement, including reasonable engineering and attorneys’ fees. b) The Developer shall also pay a fee for City construction observation and administration relating to construction of the Subdivision Improvements. Construction observation shall include inspection of all the Subdivision Improvements. In order to reimburse the City for the reasonable cost of inspection of the Subdivision Improvements, the Developer shall deposit an additional $______________ into an escrow account with the City, which shall receive and hold such funds solely under the terms of this Agreement. The City shall reimburse itself for expenses from the escrow and will provide the Developer with a copy of any invoice from the city engineer or evidence of other cost or expense attributed to the escrow prior to deducting such funds from the escrow. If any funds held under this escrow exceed the amount necessary to reimburse the City for its costs under this section, such funds shall be returned to the Developer without interest. If it appears that the actual costs incurred will exceed the estimate, the Developer and the City shall review the costs required to complete the project and the Developer shall deposit additional sums with the City. 17. Developer’s Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to construction or repair of any of the Subdivision Improvements or any other work or undertaking required by this Agreement, after providing 30 days’ notice to the Developer of the nature of the default pursuant to the notice requirements in this Agreement, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City (unless the City utilizes the Letter of Credit for such work, as expressly authorized herein). This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek an order from any court for permission to enter the Property for such purposes. If the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, levy special assessments against the land within the Subdivision to recover the costs thereof. For this purpose, the Developer, for itself and its successors and assigns, expressly waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments, including but not limited to, hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the land so assessed, as it relates to City performance of any work or undertaking performed pursuant to this section. The Developer, for itself and its successors and assigns, also waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 429.081, as it relates to City performance of any work or undertaking performed pursuant to this section. The City may also withhold the issuance of building permits and certificates of occupancy if the Developer is in default of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement or afford itself to any other rights that it may have whether in law or in equity 18. Insurance. The Developer agrees to take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six months after the City has accepted the Subdivision Improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer’s work or the work of its contractors or subcontractors. Liability limits shall not be less than $500,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful act or omission or for any other claim and $1,500,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy. The certificate of insurance shall provide that the City must be given the same advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance as is afforded to the Developer. ME230-781-813142.v4 10 19. No Building Permits Approved; Certificates of Occupancy. a) Approvals granted to date by the City regarding the Subdivision do not include approval of a building permit for any structure within the Subdivision. The Developer must submit and the City must approve building plans prior to an application for a building permit for a structure on any lot within the Subdivision. All building pads must be certified prior to initiation of construction of any structure on a lot. The Developer or the party applying for a building permit shall be responsible for payment of the customary fees associated with the building permit and all other deferred fees, if any, as specified in this Agreement. b) No certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any home constructed in the Subdivision unless prior thereto the lot has been graded and all buffer plantings installed in accordance with the Plans, the water service, sewer service, Private Road, and driveway have been installed, and an as built survey of the lot has been submitted and approved by the City. 20. Clean up and Dust Control. The Developer shall clean on a daily basis dirt and debris from streets adjoining the Subdivision resulting from construction work by the Developer, its contractors, agents or assigns, including any party constructing houses within the Subdivision. Prior to any construction on the Property or adjacent areas, the Developer shall identify to the City in writing a responsible party for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. The Developer shall provide dust control to the satisfaction of the City’s engineer throughout construction within the Subdivision. 21. Compliance with Laws. The Developer agrees to comply with all laws, resolutions, ordinances, regulations and directives of the state of Minnesota and the City applicable to the Subdivision. This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of Minnesota. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits for lots within the Subdivision, including those sold to third parties. 22. Agreement Runs with the Land. This Agreement shall run with the Property and shall be recorded against the title thereto and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the City and the Developer and their successors and assigns. The Developer warrants that there are no unrecorded encumbrances or interests relating to the Property. The Developer agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. 23. Indemnification. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by it and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from approval of the Subdivision or the other City Approvals. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys’ fees, except matters involving acts of gross negligence by the City. 24. Assignment. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the prior written permission of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or denied. It is the intention of the parties that any assignee be subject to this Agreement. ME230-781-813142.v4 11 25. Notices. Any notice or correspondence to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed to be given if delivered personally or sent by United States certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested: a) as to Developer: Hamel Townhomes, LLC ___________________ ___________________ Attention: ___________________ With a copy to: Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. Attn: Thomas Wentzell 200 Coon Rapids Blvd. NW, Suite 400 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attention: City Administrator With a copy to: David T. Anderson Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this section. The Developer shall notify the City if there is any change in its name or address. 26. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall pertain only to such section and shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other section or provision of this Agreement. 27. Non-waiver. Each right, power or remedy conferred upon the City by this Agreement is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, or available to the City at law or in equity, or under any other agreement. Each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. If either party waives in writing any default or nonperformance by the other party, such waiver shall be deemed to apply only to such event and shall not waive any other prior or subsequent default. 28. Estoppel Certificate; Partial Release. a) The City agrees to execute a certification in writing and in such form as will enable it to be recorded in the proper office for the recordation of deeds and other instruments that (i) this Agreement is unmodified and in full force and effect, or if ME230-781-813142.v4 12 there have been modifications, the identify of such modifications and that the same are in full force and effect as modified; (ii) no party is in default under any provisions of this Agreement or, if there has been a default, the nature of such default; (iii) all Subdivision Improvements to be constructed under this Agreement have been constructed, or, if not, specifying the Subdivision Improvements yet to be constructed; and (iv) as to any other matter that the requesting party shall reasonably request. Any such statement on behalf of the City may be executed by the city administrator without city council approval. b) Following completion of the Subdivision Improvements and at the written request of the Developer, the City agrees to execute a certification in writing releasing the lot or lots from the Developer’s obligations under this Agreement. Such certification shall not release the lot or lots from any obligations to the HOA, the liability under the storm sewer improvement tax district or any other ongoing obligations regarding the Subdivision. 29. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original and shall constitute one and the same Agreement. ************************* ME230-781-813142.v4 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written. CITY OF MEDINA By: __________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor By: __________________________________ Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2022, by Kathleen Martin, the mayor of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2022, by Scott T. Johnson, the city administrator of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public ME230-781-813142.v4 14 HAMEL TOWNHOMES, LLC By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF __________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________ 2022, by __________________, the __________________ of Hamel Townhomes, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ____________________________________ Notary Public This document drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 A-1 ME230-781-813142.v4 EXHIBIT A TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Property The land to which this Development Agreement applies is legally described as follows: Lots 1 through 4, Block 1, Lots 1 through 4, Block 2, Lots 1 through 8, Block 3, Lots 1 through 6, Block 4, Lots 1 through 8, Block 5, and Outlot A, all in Hamel Townhomes, Hennepin County, Minnesota. ME230-781-813142.v4 B-1 EXHIBIT B TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT List of Plan Documents The following documents prepared by Civil Site Group, Inc., engineer issue date ______________, 20___, collectively constitute the Plans: [to be inserted] ME230-781-813142.v4 C-1 EXHIBIT C TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF PRIVATE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS PRIVATE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”), is made this ___ day of _______________, 2022, by and between the city of Medina, a municipal corporation under the laws of the state of Minnesota (the “City”), and Hamel Townhomes, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer is the fee owner of certain real property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Developer is developing the Property in accordance with a separate development agreement entered into by the City and the Developer (the “Development Agreement”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Development Agreement, the Developer has agreed to construct and maintain a privately-owned and operated road (the “Private Road”) that will provide access to the individual lots that make up the Property; and WHEREAS, the Private Road is contained within the real property legally described on Exhibit B attached hereto; and WHEREAS, as a condition of the Development Agreement, the City and the Developer must enter into a maintenance and easement agreement regarding the Private Road. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants of the parties set forth herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Construction and Maintenance of the Private Road. The Developer hereby agrees to construct, reconstruct, maintain and repair the Private Road at its own expense. The Private Road consists of the grade, base, surface, ditches, culverts, stormwater improvements including, but not limited to, drainage conveyance of roadway runoff, and all other elements and appurtenances which create a driving surface suitable for vehicular traffic. The Developer acknowledges that the City has no obligation to construct, reconstruct, maintain or repair the Private Road and that the City does not intend to accept, acquire, or open the Private Road as a public roadway. Such construction, reconstruction, maintenance and repair shall meet minimum standards set forth in the approved engineering and construction plans referenced in the Development Agreement. All of the Developer’s obligations regarding the Private Road shall also be obligations of the Developer’s successors or assigns, and such obligations shall eventually be assigned to a homeowner’s association (the “HOA”). ME230-781-813142.v4 C-2 2. City’s Right to Maintain and Repair. a) The City may maintain and repair the Private Road if the City reasonably believes that the Developer or its successors or assigns has failed to adequately maintain the Private Road in accordance with section 1 of this Agreement and such failure continues for 30 days after the City gives the Developer, its successors or assigns written notice of such failure or, if such tasks cannot be completed within 30 days, after such time period as may be reasonably required to complete the required tasks provided that a good faith effort is being made to complete said tasks. The City’s notice shall specifically state which maintenance tasks are to be performed. b) If the Developer, or its successors or assigns, as the case may be, does not complete the maintenance tasks within the required time period after such notice is given by the City, the City shall have the right to enter upon the Private Road, and those portions of the Property immediately surrounding the Private Road, as may reasonably be necessary to gain access to the Private Road to perform such maintenance tasks; provided, however, the City will use reasonable efforts to minimize the disturbance and destruction of landscaping and improvements within said areas immediately surrounding the Private Road. In such case, the City shall send an invoice detailing its reasonable maintenance costs to the Developer or its successors or assigns, which shall include all reasonable staff time (at the applicable rates charged by the City to similarly situated parties), engineering and legal and other reasonable third-party costs and expenses incurred by the City. If the Developer or its successors or assigns fails to reimburse the City for its costs and expenses in maintaining the Private Road within 30 days of receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City shall have the right to assess the full cost thereof against the lots that make up the Property and collect the same in single or multiple payments as in the case of special assessments for public improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. For the purposes of this section and the City’s right to impose special assessments, the Developer’s successors and assigns shall be deemed to be the HOA or the owners of individual lots. c) The assessments shall bear interest at the rate determined by the City but not more than two percent more than the average coupon rate if the City sells debt to pay for the cost of the work or two percent over the average rate of return earned by the City on its investment portfolio if the City finances the work without selling debt. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges that the maintenance work performed by the City regarding the Private Road benefits the lots that make up the Property in an amount which exceeds the assessment and hereby waives any right to hearing or notice and the right to appeal the assessments otherwise provided by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of an emergency, as reasonably determined by the city engineer, the 30-day notice requirement for failure to perform maintenance tasks shall be and hereby is waived in its entirety, except that the City shall make reasonable effort to provide Developer such advance notice as is reasonably practicable under the circumstances, and the Developer, or its successors or assigns, shall reimburse the City and be subject to assessment for any expense so incurred by the City in the same manner as if written notice as described above has been given. Any maintenance or repairs made by the City pursuant to this section 2 will not result in the establishment of a public roadway. d) The City has the right but not an obligation to perform maintenance or repair the Private Road if the Developer or its successors and assigns fails to maintain the Private Road as required by this Agreement. The City intends to exercise this authority only if the condition of the ME230-781-813142.v4 C-3 Private Road is so poor, in the reasonable exercise of the City’s discretion, as to pose a hazard to the health, safety and welfare to those using the Private Road. 3. Conveyance of Easement; Parking Restrictions; Signage. The Developer hereby conveys a non-exclusive easement over the Private Road for ingress and egress to the City for any public service deemed necessary by the City, including but not limited to, response to police calls, fire calls, rescue and other emergency calls, inspections, animal control, provisions for adequate surface drainage, and other code enforcement issues. This section does not convey a right to the general public to use the Private Road. To ensure adequate access and circulation for emergency vehicles, and because the paved roadway surface is deemed a fire lane pursuant to section 210.29 of the Medina City Code, no vehicular parking shall be allowed on the paved roadway that makes up the Private Road or on any portion of Outlot A, Hamel Townhomes that is adjacent to and behind the lots located in Blocks 1 and 2, Hamel Townhomes. To ensure adherence to the parking restrictions summarized herein, the Developer is required under the Development Agreement to install certain no parking signage on the Property. The City may make additional written requests to the Developer, or its successors and assigns, requiring the installation of additional signage to ensure proper enforcement of the parking restrictions provided herein. Such signage shall be installed within 60 days of the City’s request and all costs associated with the signage shall be borne by the Developer or its successors or assigns, as the case may be. Parking violations on the Property that are deemed to be a violation of the Medina City Code may be enforced by the City, at its discretion, through any means available to it. 4. City Utilities. The parties understand and acknowledge that the City has drainage and utility easement over the entirety of the Private Road, which was dedicated via the plat of Hamel Townhomes, because there are public utilities located therein, including public water and sewer improvements. In the event that the City determines it necessary to excavate any portion of the Private Road for purposes of exercising any of its rights in accordance with said easement, the City agrees to restore the Private Road to a condition that it deems reasonably consistent with its condition prior to the City’s commencement of said work. 5. Reservation of Rights. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to, nor shall it, prevent the City from the exercise of its full range of land use authority regarding the Property granted to it by state statute, the City code or any other applicable regulation and the City shall be entitled to apply its official controls to the Property in the same manner and to the same extent as if it were served by public streets. 6. Hold Harmless. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) directly arising out of or directly resulting from the Developer’s, or the Developer’s agents’ or employees’ grossly negligent or intentional misconduct, or any violation of any applicable safety law, regulation, or code enacted by the City or the State of Minnesota in the performance of this Agreement, without regard to any inspection or review made or not made by the City, its agents or employees or failure by the City, its agents or employees to take any other prudent precautions. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver by the City of any immunities, defenses or other limitations on liability to which the ME230-781-813142.v4 C-4 City is entitled to by law, including but not limited to, the maximum monetary limits on liability established by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. 7. Recording; Run with the Land; Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be recorded against the Property and the Private Road. All duties and obligations of Developer under this Agreement shall also be duties and obligations of Developer’s successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the land. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon execution and recording by the HOA for the Property of an instrument in a form satisfactory to the City assuming and agreeing to perform the obligations and responsibilities of the Developer under this Agreement, the HOA shall be bound by all terms and conditions of this Agreement as if it were the original signatory hereto and the Developer, its successors and assigns, shall be released from all personal liability under this Agreement but the individual lots that make up the Property shall remain subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 8. Costs of Enforcement. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all reasonable costs incurred by the City in the enforcement of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees. 9. Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall either be personally delivered or be sent by United States certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: a) as to Developer: Hamel Townhomes, LLC ___________________ ___________________ Attention: ___________________ b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attention: City Administrator with a copy to: David T. Anderson Kennedy & Graven 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this paragraph. 10. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be binding and effective as of the date first written above. ********************* ME230-781-813142.v4 C-5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written. CITY OF MEDINA By: __________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor By: __________________________________ Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2022, by Kathleen Martin, the mayor of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2022, by Scott T. Johnson, the city administrator of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public ME230-781-813142.v4 C-6 HAMEL TOWNHOMES, LLC By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF __________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________ 2022, by __________________, the __________________ of Hamel Townhomes, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ____________________________________ Notary Public This document drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 C-A-1 ME230-781-813142.v4 EXHIBIT A TO PRIVATE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Property The Property is legally described as follows: Lots 1 through 4, Block 1, Lots 1 through 4, Block 2, Lots 1 through 8, Block 3, Lots 1 through 6, Block 4, Lots 1 through 8, Block 5, and Outlot A, all in Hamel Townhomes, Hennepin County, Minnesota. C-B-1 ME230-781-813142.v4 EXHIBIT B TO PRIVATE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Property Containing the Private Road Outlot A, Hamel Townhomes, Hennepin County, Minnesota. D-1 ME230-781-813142.v4 EXHIBIT D TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the ____ day of _________, 2022, by and between the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”) and Hamel Townhomes, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer is the fee owner of certain real property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the City has obtained drainage and utility easements for stormwater facilities over portions of the Property (the “Easement Areas”); and WHEREAS, by a separate development agreement (the “Development Agreement”), the Developer has agreed to construct and maintain said stormwater facilities (the “Stormwater Improvements”) over the Easement Areas for the benefit of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Stormwater Improvements which are the subject of this Agreement include the components of the Plans associated with stormwater management, including all related facilities. The location of the Stormwater Improvements are shown on Exhibit B attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission requires permanent provisions for handling of runoff, including terms and conditions for operation and maintenance of all Stormwater Improvements, and requires such provisions to be set forth in an agreement to be recorded against the Property; and WHEREAS, the City and the Developer intend to comply with certain conditions, including entering into a maintenance agreement regarding the Stormwater Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants of the parties set forth herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements. The Developer, for itself and its successor or assigns, agrees to maintain the Stormwater Improvements and observe all drainage laws governing the operation and maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements. The Developer shall make periodic inspection and perform maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements as described in Exhibit C attached hereto. The Developer shall make all such scheduled inspections and maintenance, keep record of all inspections and maintenance activities, and submit such D-2 ME230-781-813142.v4 records annually to the City. The cost of all such inspections and maintenance shall be the obligation of the Developer and its successors or assigns as the fee owner of the Property, which obligation shall be assigned to the HOA, as defined hereinafter, in accordance with section 7 of this Agreement. 2. City’s Maintenance Rights. The City may inspect the Stormwater Improvements at any time and shall have the right to enter upon the Easement Areas and such portions of the Property as may reasonably be necessary to gain access to the Easement Areas to perform such inspections. Additionally, the City may maintain the Stormwater Improvements, as provided in this paragraph, if the City reasonably believes that the Developer or its successors or assigns has failed to maintain the Stormwater Improvements in accordance with applicable drainage laws and other requirements and such failure continues for 30 days after the City gives the Developer written notice of such failure or, if such tasks cannot be completed within 30 days, after such time period as may be reasonably required to complete the required tasks provided that Developer is making a good faith effort to complete said tasks. The City’s notice shall specifically state which maintenance tasks are to be performed. If Developer does not complete the maintenance tasks within the required time period after such notice is given by the City, the City shall have the right to enter upon the Easement Areas and such portions of the Property as may reasonably be necessary to gain access to the Easement Areas to perform such maintenance tasks. In such case, the City shall send an invoice of its reasonable maintenance costs to the Developer or its successors or assigns, which shall include all reasonable staff time, engineering and legal and other reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City. If the Developer or its successors or assigns fails to reimburse the City for its costs and expenses in maintaining the Stormwater Improvements within 30 days of receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City shall have the right to assess the full cost thereof against the lots within the Property. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges that the maintenance work performed by the City regarding the Stormwater Improvements benefits the Property in an amount which exceeds the assessment and hereby waives any right to hearing or notice and the right to appeal the assessments otherwise provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of an emergency, as determined by the city engineer, the 30-day notice requirement to the Developer for failure to perform maintenance tasks shall be and hereby is waived in its entirety by the Developer, except that the City shall make reasonable effort to provide Developer such advance notice as is reasonably practicable under the circumstances, and the Developer shall reimburse the City and be subject to assessment for any expense so incurred by the City in the same manner as if written notice as described above has been given. 3. Hold Harmless. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising out of or resulting from the Developer’s, or the Developer’s agents’ or employees’ negligent or intentional acts, or any violation of any safety law, regulation or code in the performance of this Agreement, without regard to any inspection or review made or not made by the City, its agents or employees or failure by the City, its agents or employees to take any other prudent precautions, except to the extent of grossly negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and representatives. In the event the City, upon the failure of the Developer to comply with any conditions of this Agreement, performs said conditions pursuant to its authority in this Agreement, the Developer shall indemnify and hold D-3 ME230-781-813142.v4 harmless the City, its employees, agents and representatives for its own negligent acts in the performance of the Developer’s required work under this Agreement, but this indemnification shall not extend to intentional or grossly negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and representatives. 4. Costs of Enforcement. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all reasonable costs prudently incurred by the City in the enforcement of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees after providing written notice to Developer and a reasonable opportunity to cure. 5. Rights Not Exclusive. No right of the City under this Agreement shall be deemed to be exclusive and the City shall retain all rights and powers it may have under Minnesota Statutes, sections 444.16 to 444.21 to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain and otherwise improve the Stormwater Improvements. 6. Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall either be personally delivered or be sent by United States certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: a) as to Developer: Hamel Townhomes, LLC ___________________ ___________________ Attention: ___________________ b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attn: City Administrator With a copy to: David T. Anderson Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this paragraph. 7. Successors and Assigns. All duties and obligations of Developer under this Agreement shall also be duties and obligations of Developer’s successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the Property. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon creation of a homeowners’ association for the Property (the “HOA”) by an instrument in a form satisfactory to the City which assumes and agrees to perform the obligations and responsibilities of the Developer under this Agreement, the HOA shall be bound by all terms and conditions of this Agreement as if it were the original signatory hereto and the Developer, its successors and assigns, shall be released from all personal liability under this Agreement but the Property shall D-4 ME230-781-813142.v4 remain subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 8. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be binding and effective as of the date first written above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written. CITY OF MEDINA By: __________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor By: __________________________________ Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2022, by Kathleen Martin, the mayor of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2022, by Scott T. Johnson, the city administrator of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public D-5 ME230-781-813142.v4 HAMEL TOWNHOMES, LLC By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF __________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________ 2022, by __________________, the __________________ of Hamel Townhomes, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ____________________________________ Notary Public This document drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 D-A-1 ME230-781-813142.v4 EXHIBIT A TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Property The land to which this Stormwater Maintenance Agreement applies is legally described as follows: Lots 1 through 4, Block 1, Lots 1 through 4, Block 2, Lots 1 through 8, Block 3, Lots 1 through 6, Block 4, Lots 1 through 8, Block 5, and Outlot A, all in Hamel Townhomes, Hennepin County, Minnesota. D-B-1 ME230-781-813142.v4 EXHIBIT B TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Depiction of Location of Stormwater Improvements [to be added] D-C-1 ME230-781-813142.v4 EXHIBIT C TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Inspection and Maintenance Schedule [to be added] ME230-781-813142.v4 E-1 EXHIBIT E TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Subdivision Improvement Cost Estimate [to be added] K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-11 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-07-15 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx 7 0 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | S U I T E 3 0 0 | M I N N E A P O L I S , M N | 5 5 4 1 6 | 7 6 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | W S B E N G . C O M July 15, 2022 Mr. Dusty Finke City Planning Director City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: Hamel Townhome Project Final Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review City Project No. LR-22-314 WSB Project No. 019125-000 Dear Mr. Finke: WSB staff have reviewed the Hamel Townhomes Development Final Plat and Civil Plans submittal dated July 11, 2022. The applicant proposes to construct 30 rental townhomes on a 2.15 acre parcel located in the Uptown Hamel area in the City of Medina. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina’s general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. General & Preliminary Plat 1. The plan provides sidewalks and other pedestrian amenities within the site. See the City Planners comments on pedestrian access and mobility requirements. 2. With future submittals provide an existing conditions/removal plan, grading plan, construction details, and erosion/sediment control plans. Provide a SWPPP with final construction plans. Complete. 3. Additional drainage and utility easements will be required for the underground stormwater treatment area and the subsurface drainage area under the pet park area. In-progress, the applicant has now shown the entire outlot to be drainage and utility easement; a final review will be made with final construction plans. 4. The width of the drainage and utility easement for the water/sewer utilities should be wide enough to allow for 10’ beyond both the water and sewer main locations. In-progress, the applicant has now shown the entire outlot to be drainage and utility easement; a final review will be made with final construction plans. 5. Add a 5’ drainage and utility easement for the common draintile system adjacent to the Hamel Road right of way. In-progress, review by City staff will be conducted under separated cover. 6. Stairs from the building(s) should not be located within City right of way on Hamel Road. Complete. 7. Provide a clear phasing plan for construction. The City is concerned about protecting the underground stormwater treatment area with the compact site and the potential to have multiple contractors and/or operations occurring simultaneously. City of Medina – Hamel Townhome Development Final Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review July 15, 2022 Page 2 K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-11 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-07-15 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx 8. City code has requirements for setback distances for cut/fill slopes including what would be created with retaining walls, see section 828.28 Subpt.13 (excerpt below). Refer to the full ordinance and requirements. The code requires that the minimum setback is 2’; this should include related geogrid reinforcement, drainage aggregate, and draintile, or other improvements associated with the wall construction. The cut slope requirements have been met at the southeasterly retaining wall but the fill slopes requirements have not at the northerly retaining wall. In-progress, City staff will provide response on this ordinance since it is not being met. 9. In general, the City does not typically allow retaining walls within drainage and utility easements. Consider ways in which the proposed walls can be relocated out of these easements or eliminate altogether. In-progress, easements have been revised; a final review will be made with final construction plans. 10. Construction of the proposed improvements should not encroach onto adjacent properties without their express written consent. If disturbances on adjacent properties are proposed, provide written consent to the City. See areas on the east side where the proposed 8’ deep storm sewer is greater than the distance to the property line (2-5’). This will likely lead to impacts to the neighboring property and specifically the trees. Complete, storm sewer has been moved to avoid property line. 11. Additional comments were provided directly on the plan sheets. All comments from the plan sheets may not be included with the review letter. 12. On the landscaping plan, it appears that proposed tree locations may impede sight distance at the driveway entrance to Hamel Road. Provide a sight distance analysis/linework for review. City of Medina – Hamel Townhome Development Final Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review July 15, 2022 Page 3 K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-11 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-07-15 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx Removals Plan (C1.0) 13. Show removals associated with the utility abandonment and connections within Hamel Road, including the new sanitary sewer extension to the west. Complete. 14. Provide an additional ‘Offsite’ removal plan sheet to show the impacts to both Hamel Road and the trail with the installation of the sanitary sewer to the west. Show the location of the City Rainwater Nature Area sign for possible conflicts, 15. Pavement removals in the road will need to be to the centerline or full width as directed by the City 16. Note what is proposed for removal/abandonment of existing water/sewer services. Show all existing sewer and water services, see utility asbuilts. o Show the removal of the existing 6” water stub to the point of the proposed connection o Note whether each existing utility service is to be removed, abandoned, or to be protected and remain 17. Show location of existing storm sewer line adjacent to the northerly property line; the location may affect the proposed location of the storm sewer outlet, see utility asbuilts. Complete. Site Plan & Turning Movements (C2.0-C2.2) 18. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building structures and required turn around space as required by the Fire Marshall. Provided, awaiting response from Fire Marshall. 19. The City may consider widening Hamel Road in the future to provide additional on-street parking. With that in mind, provide site grading and building elevations that accommodate the future relocation of sidewalk facilities up to or closer to the property line (within City right-of-way). The City may wish to consider the widening of Hamel Road for the purposes of adding off-street parking be constructed with the project. The work should include the sidewalk relocation with a 6’ minimum boulevard to back of curb. In-progress, the applicant is showing the sidewalk and boulevard on the plans to be constructed by others, not with the project. At this point, we understand this work will indeed be included with the project. Additional comments will be provided pertaining to cost-sharing agreements under separate cover so that these improvements are constructed with the project. 20. Hatch and/or note proposed paving area within Hamel Road where it is shown to be widened for the parking lane. Also show dimensioning labels for boulevard and widened turn lane. 21. Provide the surface type for the transition area shown between the trail and the sidewalk. 22. Additional comments: o Identity areas where “tip-put” curb is proposed through out the site and label on plans. Tip-out surmountable curb results in the back of curb height increasing by about 4” in order to fully tip-out gutter. o Verify whether several erroneous curb labels are still applicable on the plans Update linework where applicable City of Medina – Hamel Townhome Development Final Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review July 15, 2022 Page 4 K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-11 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-07-15 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx o Label protecting or replacing the southwest development property corner with the sidewalk installation o Remove the previous/existing paver linework at the southwest corner of the development o The entrance to the development should be shown as solid concrete per City Standard Detail STR-15 o Show the existing material that the sidewalk along Hamel Road will match into on the east end o Label or call out the wheel stops in the northern parking spaces. Provide a detail o Several of the northern parking spaces overlap with the designated snow storage area. Note this will reduce parking capacity in the winter. 23. Turn off contouring on site plan sheets. Grading Plan (C3.0) 24. Provide a grading plan with future submittals. Include drainage arrows on the grading plan showing the direction of flow and slope percentages. A portion of the site will impact the existing ponding location to the west, expand the pond to the greatest extent possible at the northeast corner of the adjacent pond. With final plans include flow arrows and slope percentages along curb lines, across sheet flow areas, and along swales. 25. Provide EOF locations for all low points inside and outside the roadway. Verify freeboard between EOFs and adjacent building lowest opening elevations 26. Maintain all surface grades within the minimum of 2% and maximum of 33% slopes. Vegetated swale grades shall be 2.0% or more. A swale will be required along the easterly and northerly property lines. With final plat submittal, provide more drainage arrows and grade percentages for curb lines and paved areas. 27. Show retaining wall locations and provide construction details. Retaining wall locations were shown on plan. Please provide typical section/details with final plat submittal. The retaining wall on along the easterly property line is on the down gradient of the slope from the east, runoff will likely be directed over the wall. The final wall design should consider this issue and ways to mitigate it. Complete. 28. Wall heights are shown to be greater than 4’ in some locations. Walls greater than 4’ must be designed by an engineer. Provide engineering plans/drawings prior to construction for review (can take several weeks for review approval). Also, provide agreements for maintenance and ownership of all retaining walls proposed on the site. 29. Show storm sewer structure numbers on the grading plan. 30. Note the high point elevations at the access drive where the grade splits between the site and the City ROW. Most of the City ROW should drain to Hamel Road, locate the high point as close to the ROW as possible. Complete. 31. Based on the existing profile grade of Hamel Road, it does not appear that a valley gutter or concrete apron is necessary. Also, within the site, confirm that the valley gutters are needed; it appears the long north/south valley gutter is being placed where the surface grade is proposed to be at least 2.0%. Complete, with plan updates and flatter grades applicant is showing installation of valley gutter. City of Medina – Hamel Townhome Development Final Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review July 15, 2022 Page 5 K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-11 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-07-15 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx 32. The width of the proposed swale along the easterly property line is relatively narrow, especially adjacent to the proposed retaining wall. Along the bottom of the swale, create a “French Drain” with amended soil to the surface and perforated PVC. Complete, applicant has provided catch basins structures in-lieu of French drain. 33. Add a legend/detail for grading elevations and symbols (LF, G, GR, TB, etc.). Confirm elevations are correct at the southwest group. Complete. 34. Provide fencing for the retaining wall in the southeast corner. Complete. 35. The low point in the new curb line in Hamel Road east of the entrance does not drain. Complete. 36. The proposed grading along the easterly property line is shown right up to the property line. This does not leave space for silt fence or a buffer for construction. Move the grading in and consider the space needed to install silt fence without disturbing the adjacent property. Complete, construction limits are shown on the plan within the property. 37. Add storm sewer structure numbers to grading plan. Utility Plan (C4.0-C4.3) General 38. Any public sanitary sewer and watermain shall be encompassed by drainage and utility easements where located outside of public road right of way. Drainage and utility easements will need to allow for a 1:1 trench from the invert of the utility with a minimum of 20’ centered on the utility. Complete, easements are shown over water/sewer mains. 39. For all existing public utilities, label the pipe size, pipe material, and proposed percent grade for gravity mains. Complete. 40. Abandon the existing watermain and sewer services up to the right of way at Hamel Road. Unless there will be disturbance within Hamel Road for other improvements, the City does not want to disturb the roadway pavement just for the service abandonment. Complete. 41. On the final construction plans add the following notes: Complete. o The City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred associated with variations in the utility asbuilt plans, elevations, or locations. o Watermain shall have a minimum of 7.5’ of cover. o The City will require televising for sanitary sewer pipe installations prior to accepting a warranty for the utility systems; provide report and video files to the City for review. 42. Turn off contouring on utility plan sheets. Show and note drainage and utility easements on utility plans. Watermain 43. Watermain looping connections will be needed to minimize long dead-end watermain sections; the proposed site accommodates watermain looping. City of Medina – Hamel Townhome Development Final Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review July 15, 2022 Page 6 K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-11 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-07-15 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx Consideration of further watermain looping needs and stubs for future phases or other adjacent developments will be required and reviewed with future submittals. Complete. the City will not require additional watermain stubs for future extension. 44. The City Fire Marshall will need to review the proposed watermain sizing of 6”. Provide calculations that show the 6” is sufficient to support 30 units and potential fire flows. 45. Hydrant locations shall be approved of by the Fire Marshal; typically, a maximum of 250’ influence radius (approximately 400’ spacing) is required to serve the immediate residential areas. Show proposed hydrant locations on the utility plan and provide an exhibit showing hydrant influence spacing. The City preference is to have a hydrant located on the north end of the project within the loop to allow for more efficient flushing. Sd opposed to adding another hydrant, consider moving the one shown in the center to the north. 46. Where any sewer pipe (storm or sanitary) crosses the watermain, include a note saying “Maintain 18-Inch Separation, 4” Rigid Insulation”. Also, provide horizontal dimension notes in various locations between the watermain and storm/sanitary sewer. Note location of insulation where storms sewer crosses watermain on public road (shared access). Complete. 47. The watermain connections to the building(s) shall be reviewed and approved by the City Fire Marshall. With future submittals show proposed water service and sanitary sewer service locations on the plans; the City requires a minimum depth of 4’ from low floor elevations for sanitary sewer services. Complete. 48. There appears to be a missing water service location to the most southeasterly set of townhomes. Complete. 49. Connect into the existing 6” watermain stub from Hamel, see record plans for location. Complete. 50. Provide hydrants at each dead end of the main, which also appears to correlate with the highest points of the watermain loop to the south. Complete. 51. Clarify which label describes the water services to the units (1/2” copper; 6” combined DIP). Individual units should have a minimum 1” service. Complete. 52. Call out all watermain fittings/bends. Complete. 53. Show the full impact area of connecting to the watermain stub at the point shown. Complete. 54. The City standard watermain material is PVC C900, revised text to note this type of pipe for the main. Sanitary Sewer 55. The applicant is proposing a lift station for the sanitary sewer system. Generally, the City does not allow a lift station if there are other options to convey sewage through gravity means. Consider a gravity connection to the southwest of the site, through Rainwater Park and into Hamel Road. Reference the City’s record plan for the sanitary sewer depths on Hamel Rd (enclosed). Complete. 56. The City’s typical standard is to place sewer a minimum of 10’ below the surface (18” vertical separation below the watermain). Where this depth is not feasible, the City will allow an 8’ depth; depths less than 8’ will require review on a case-by-case basis. Show rim/invert information for all sanitary manholes. Complete. City of Medina – Hamel Townhome Development Final Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review July 15, 2022 Page 7 K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-11 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-07-15 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx Three manholes are proposed with depths less than 8’, MH 4, 4A, and 4B. Since a forcemain system is being proposed for the majority of the units (and is approved by the City, see previous comments), the City’s preference is to connect the remaining sewer to this system to achieve standard manhole depth. Complete. 57. With final construction plans, if basements are proposed with the townhomes, the City will require draintile or other connections for sump pump discharges. A separate foundation pipe system in addition to the sump discharge system should be considered. Complete, the applicant has added a common sump mainline for those units with basements. 58. A wet-tap connection typically includes a valve, show this valve location at the wet-tap. With that in mind, the first valve location shown within the site will not be needed. There are a number of valves shown on the plan. From the City’s perspective, a valve will be needed on each side of the tee from the street, and one more at the north end. Complete. 59. Provide a sewer stub into the northeast green space for future connections. Complete. 60. Show all existing utilities and impacts connecting to the existing sanitary sewer at the intersection with Hunter Drive. Complete. o Show proposed pipe, structures, and connections as black. o Show existing sanitary sewer, storm sewer, potable water lines, raw water lines, etc. as screened or greyed-out. o Note that there are both potable and raw watermains in the intersection. o Provide all crossing information. Storm Sewer 61. Provide additional structure information for proposed roof drain collection system, such as rim and invert elevations. Complete. 62. Pipe angles within manholes shall not be less than 90 degrees, revised the draintile “bend” location at the northeasterly portion of the property. Complete. 63. Add additional roof drain common collection systems for the remaining townhome units along the easterly property line at minimum; consider connecting all of the townhomes to a common collection system. Along the easterly swale include additional “Nyoplast” structures similar to what is shown for the townhomes along Hamel Road. Complete. 64. With the addition of the downspout drainage and the structures to the draintile along the easterly property line, confirm what pipe size is adequate to convey stormwater. Complete. 65. CB 5 and CB 6 should be shown as CBMH’s with 48” structures with 15” and 18” inlet and outlet pipes respectively. Complete. Civil Details (C5.0 – C5.8) 66. Add typical street section(s) details to the plans meeting the City’s standard, at minimum. The final pavement section shall be designed by a registered geotechnical engineer for the specific soil conditions found on the site. Typical sections were provided, provide the geotechnical report with pavement recommendations. Provide a typical section for the work occurring within Hamel Road. City of Medina – Hamel Townhome Development Final Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review July 15, 2022 Page 8 K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-11 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-07-15 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx 67. Use City standard details where applicable. A final review will be provided with final plan submittal. Complete. 68. On the sanitary sewer manhole details, the City no longer allows the internal top-hat. Instead, cross out this note and add “Flex-Seal or approved equal” as the internal chimney liner. SWPPP (SW 1.0 – SW 1.6) 69. An NPDES permit will be required for this project, a copy of the permit will be required prior to the issuance of City permits. 70. A SWPPP and erosion/sediment control plans were provided with the plan set. A full detailed review of the erosion/sediment control plan and SWPPP sheets will be completed with the final plat submittal. 71. Include all information required in SWPPP as referenced in the general permit in section 5.3-5.26 72. Provide redundant erosion control, spaced 5’ apart bordering existing pond to limit any sedimentation. 73. Include a site map showing receiving waters within 1 mile of the project location as required. Including Elm Creek which is an impaired waterbody 74. Provide anticipated quantities of erosion control bmp’s needed for the project. Type of bmp along with specific quantities. Traffic & Access 75. Based on the proposed site plan the anticipated traffic generation would be 512 daily trips, 32 AM peak hour trips and 39 PM peak hour trips, assuming 78 townhomes on the site. 76. Provide a figure showing truck movements throughout the site including the largest truck and the largest fire truck. Design driveways and circulation routes to accommodate these vehicles. Provided, awaiting response from Fire Marshall. Stormwater Management 77. The applicant will need to submit a Stormwater Management Plan and modeling consistent with Medina’s Stormwater Design Manual. 78. The development will need to meet the City’s volume control requirement to capture and retain onsite 1.1” of runoff from the net new impervious surface. By satisfying the volume requirement the water quality requirement is considered met. Follow the City’s Stormwater Design Manual for alternative credits towards the volume requirement if infiltration is not feasible. o Volume control for this site is provided by the adjacent pond constructed by the city. The pond was designed to handle and treat up to 50% impervious cover. Any additional impervious over 50% will need to be treated on site. City of Medina – Hamel Townhome Development Final Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review July 15, 2022 Page 9 K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-11 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-07-15 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx o Filtration receives 50% credit for stormwater treatment. If filtration is being used 2.2” of runoff should be used in calculations to assure adequate treatment. o Complete, proposed underground filtration meets the additional 32% impervious requirement. Volume control is met using both the regional pond (30%) and the infiltration basin (52%). Provide additional plans for underground treatment system that includes a detailed plan view and location of cleanouts or other access locations. 79. The development will need to meet the City’s rate control requirement, which states that post development discharge rates must be less than or equal to existing conditions discharge rates. o Complete, rates for all modeled storm events meet the requirement. 80. Water quality standards must be met. Provided MIDS print out show that the site in meeting City and Elm Creek standards. 81. Provide storm sewer sizing calculations and rational for verification with future submittals. Refer to the city design guidelines for pipe sizing and flow requirements. o Confirm that proposed CB’s have adequate capacity to handle the runoff from the impervious surfaces. There is a lot of drainage that is being conveyed from the south to the north. o Consider additional “on-grade” catch basins to collect runoff before the low point. o Confirm inlet capacity for roof drain collection system along the easterly property line. It appears stormwater model assumes this is being collected and conveyed to treatment area. 82. Include surface Inlet CB 6 as a sump to provide pretreatment of parking lot runoff before discharging into the underground system. 83. The City requires two feet of freeboard from structure low openings to 100-year high water levels and EOF’s. o HWL for the underground filtration system is 998.72. Provide EOF route and elevation to confirm freeboard. The route of the EOF appears to be o Provide HWL for adjacent stormwater pond to show freeboard is met for proposed structure. 84. The City requires two feet of freeboard from structure low openings. The LO of the building in the northwest corner (1002.0) is not two feet higher than the adjacent EOF (1001.0). In areas where this separation is not or cannot be provided, additional analysis is required to show that the 100-year back-to back storm event does not affect adjacent structures. 85. Provide long term Operation and Maintenance schedule for the underground facility. 86. The development will need to meet the appropriate watershed standards for Elm Creek Water Management Commission and the applicant shall submit for the required permits. In-progress, provide copies of completed permitting from watershed. Wetlands 87. There do not appear to be any wetlands present within the project parcel. City of Medina – Hamel Townhome Development Final Plat & Civil Plans – Engineering Plan Review July 15, 2022 Page 10 K:\019125-000\Admin\Docs\2022-07-11 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-07-15 Hamel Townhomes Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review Comments.docx 88. There is a pond located on the parcel to the west, but buffers are not required for wetlands outside of the subject property. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards. We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet. Sincerely, WSB Jim Stremel, P.E. City Engineer Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C0.0 TITLE SHEET . . . . . . . . . . . . HAMEL TOWNHOMES MEDINA, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER SITE LOCATION MAP N ISSUED FOR: FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL DEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER: HAMEL TOWNHOMES, LLC 1850 W WAYZATA BLVD LONG LAKE, MN 55356 CONTACT. OWNER: GRANT TJERNAGEL EMAIL: GRANT@PRO-COMMERCIAL.COM DIRECT: 515-597-4700 ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: CIVIL SITE GROUP 5000 GLENWOOD AVE GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 CONTACT. ENGINEER: MATT PAVEK, PE EMAIL: MPAVEK@CIVILSITEGROUP.COM OFFICE : 612-615-0060 LANDSCAPE ARCH.: ROBERT BINDER, PLA EMAIL: RBINDER@CIVILSITEGROUP.COM OFFICE : 612-615-0060 SURVEYOR: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: Know what's below.before you dig.Call R ARCHITECT: COLLINS/WEBB 307B SW MARKT ST LEE'S SUMMIT, MISSOURI 64063 CONTACT. ARCHITECT: JASON PECSI, AIA EMAIL: JPECSI@COLLINSANDWEBB.COM DIRECT: 816-249-2278 CIVIL SITE GROUP 4931 W 35TH STREET SUITE 200 ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CONTACT. SURVEYOR: RORY SYNSTELIEN, LS EMAIL: RORY@CIVILSITEGROUP.COM OFFICE: 612-615-0060 ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES 2825 CEDAR AVE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407 CONTACT. ENGINEER: PAUL GIONFRIDDO, PE EMAIL: PGIONFRIDDO@HAUGOGTS.COM OFFICE: 612-271-8185 SITE LOCATION SHEET TITLE C0.0 TITLE SHEET SITE SURVEYV1.0 UTILITY PLAN - SANITARY & WATERC4.0 SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0 GRADING PLANC3.0 C5.0 C5.1 L1.0 CIVIL DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1 SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.2 C2.0 SITE PLAN SWPPP - NARRATIVESW1.4 CIVIL DETAILS C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN C5.2 CIVIL DETAILS SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.5 SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.6 L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES & DETAILS C2.2 VEHICLE TURNING DIAGRAM UTILITY PLAN OFFSITE - SANITARY & WATERC4.1 C5.3 C5.4 CIVIL DETAILS CIVIL DETAILS C5.5 CIVIL DETAILS C5.6 C5.8 CIVIL DETAILS CIVIL DETAILS SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.3 C5.7 CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN HYDRANT SPACINGC4.2 C2.1 SITE PLAN OFFSITE UTILITY PLAN - STORMWATERC4.3 SW Cor n e r of Lot 1 6 N'ly Lin e o f H a m e l R o a d (f.k.a. R o c k f o r d R o a d ) (P.O.B.) A P o i n t 552.5 fe e t N W ' l y o f the SW C o r n e r o f Lot 16 ( " P o i n t A " ) Lin e P a r a l l e l w i t h NW ' l y L i n e o f L o t 1 6 S'ly Rig h t - o f - W a y Line of S o o L i n e Railroad Point of Beginni n g Lin e P a r a l l e l w i t h NW ' l y L i n e o f L o t 1 6 pe r f o u n d m o n u m e n t a t i o n 30.83. 6 15.8 13 . 4 6.2 24 . 2 22.5 3. 8 12.50. 7 17.6 10 . 9 0.3 26 . 7 40 . 2 28.5 40 . 3 28.3 Fire Pit Stone Wall Bituminous Driveway Deck HAMEL R O A D S73°1 2 ' 0 9 " E 2 9 0 . 0 0 S1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 8 " W 3 1 7 . 3 4 N74°53 ' 2 7 " W 2 9 0 . 0 0 N1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 6 " E 3 2 5 . 8 9 2 Story House 342 Hamel Rd Foundation Area= 1,899 S.F. Block Wall Bl o c k Wa l l Pavers Pavers Edge of Woods (f.k.a. R o c k f o r d R o a d ) 12" RC P 30 " RC P 18" RC P 18" RC P 12" RCP 8" PVC 8" PVC 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LI N E R A I L R O A D (Width V a r i e s ) Block Wall Bit u m i n o u s T r a i l Railroa d T r a c k s Garage (A Publi c R / W ) 175.00 115.00 Access POND PID: 1211823420015 PID: 1211823420016 Address Unassigned 552.50 80.00 NW ' l y L i n e of L o t 1 6 [A] Side w a l k Crosses Propert y Line 8" PVC DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED That part of Lot 18 Auditor’s Subdivision No. 241, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on Northerly line of Rockford Road distant 552.5 feet Northwesterly from Southwest corner of Lot 16, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 241, said point to be known as Point "A", thence Northwesterly along said Northerly road line distant 175 feet, thence Northeasterly parallel with Northwesterly line of said Lot 16 to Southerly right-of-way line of Soo Line Railroad, thence Southeasterly along said right-of-way line distant 80 feet to actual point of beginning; thence Southerly to said point “A”; thence Southeasterly along said Northerly road line distant 115 feet; thence Northeasterly parallel with Northwesterly line of said Lot 16, to Southerly right-of-way line of said Railroad; thence Northwesterly along said right-of-way line to beginning (12-118-23-42-0016) AND That part of Lot 18 Auditor’s Subdivision No. 241, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point where the Northwesterly line of Lot 16, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 241 intersects the Northeasterly right-of-way line of the Rockford Road; thence Northwesterly along said right-of-way line 552.5 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continuing Northwesterly along said right-of-way line 175.0 feet; thence Northeasterly parallel with the Northwesterly line of said Lot 16 a distance of 323.6 feet more or less to the Southwesterly right-of-way line of the Soo Line Railroad; thence Southeasterly along said railroad right-of-way line 80.0 feet; thence Southerly to the point of beginning. (12-118-23-42-0015) GENERAL SURVEY NOTES 1. Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (1986 Adjustment). 2. Elevations are based on the NGVD 29 Datum. Site Benchmark is the top nut hydrant located on the south side of Hamel Rd, having an elevation of 1010.49 feet, as shown hereon. 3. We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our ability based on observed evidence together with evidence from the following sources: plans obtained from utility companies, plans provided by client, markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources. We have used this information to develop a view of the underground utilities for this site. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. 4. Site Address: 342 Hamel Road, Medina, MN 55340. 5. This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0167F, effective date of November 4, 2021. 6. The Gross land area is 93,259 +/- square feet or 2.141 +/- acres. 7. The names of the adjoining owners of the platted lands, as shown hereon, are based on information obtained from Hennepin County GIS. SURVEY REPORT 1. This map and report was prepared with the benefit of a Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic Title Insurance Company, File No. 2129307, dated June 10, 2021. We note the following with regards to Schedule B of the herein referenced Title Commitment: a. Item no.'s 1-6 and 8-11 are not survey related. b. The following are numbered per the referenced title Commitment: [7]. There is an easement for sewer purposes over that part of the property as shown by Document No. 8107991. Please note this easement lies westerly of and does not appear to affect subject property. 2. Conflicts such as (but not limited to): encroachments, protrusions, access, occupation, and easements and/or servitudes: [A] Please note there is a sidewalk that crosses the southwest property corner. VICINITY MAP Me d i n a T o w n h o m e s 34 2 H a m e l R o a d , M e d i n a , M N 5 5 3 4 0 Ed i n a R e a l i t y Jo s h A n d e r s o n PR O J E C T PROJECT NO.: 21266 COPYRIGHT 2021 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION V1.0 BOUNDARY/ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 5/31/2022 Additional Topo . . . . . . . . . . N 44565 RORY L. SYNSTELIEN LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 7-27-2021 N CL I E N T Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 QA/QC FIELD CREW DRAWN BY REVIEWED BY UPDATED BY DJT JRN CJ . OVERHEAD UTILITIES GASMAIN SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER FIBER/COMM. LINE ELECTRIC LINE (RECORD) WATERMAIN ELECTRIC LINE GASMAIN (RECORD) CHAINLINK FENCELINE Linetype & Symbol Legend CONCRETE SURFACE PAVER SURFACE BITUMINOUS SURFACE GRAVEL/LANDSCAPE SURFACE WOODEN FENCELINE GUARDRAIL WATERMAIN (RECORD) SANITARY SEWER (RECORD) STORM SEWER (RECORD) FIBER/COMM. LINE (RECORD) TELEPHONE LINE (RECORD) TELEPHONE LINE SIGNSANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE CABLE TV BOX TELEPHONE MANHOLE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE BOX TRAFFIC SIGNAL GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER WATER MANHOLE WATER VALVE AIR CONDITIONER BOLLARD CATCH BASIN ELECTRIC MANHOLE GAS VALVE FLAG POLE HANDICAP SYMBOL FOUND IRON MONUMENT HYDRANT CAST IRON MONUMENT SET IRON MONUMENT FLARED END SECTION POWER POLE UTILITY MANHOLE GUY WIRE CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE ROOF DRAIN SEWER CLEAN OUT FIRE CONNECTION WELL UTILITY VAULT POST INDICATOR VALVE GAS MANHOLE HAND HOLE FIBER/COMM. MANHOLE MAIL BOX FUEL TANK ELECTRICAL OUTLET SB SOIL BORING LIGHT POLE 80204002040 SCALE IN FEET CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF EOF REMOVE EXISTING TREE AND ROOT BALL, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING TREE AND ROOT BALL, IN R.O.W. COORDINATE WITH CITY FOR ALL WORK IN R.O.W. REMOVE EXISTING TREE AND ROOT BALL, TYP. SAWCUT & REMOVE REMOVE EXISTING PVMT. SEE SITE PLAN FOR NEW PROPOSED PVMT. EDGE/LAYOUT (FUTURE BY OTHERS) REMOVE & SALVAGE CONC. PAVERS. STOCKPILE FOR REINSTALLATION, SEE SITE PLAN FOR NEW LAYOUT PROTECT EXIST. UTILITIES TO REMAIN, TYP. REMOVE & SALVAGE CONC. PAVERS. STOCKPILE FOR REINSTALLATION, SEE SITE PLAN FOR NEW LAYOUT REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER, (FUTURE, BY OTHERS) REMOVE ALL PVMTS., INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL, TYP. REMOVE ALL WALLS, STEPS, TIMBERS & CURBS, INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL & FOOTINGS, TYP. REMOVE ALL BUILDING STRUCTURES, INCLUDING ALL FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS & ALL UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES. REMOVE ALL ADJACENT AND ATTACHED STRUCTURES (DECKS, PORCHES). REMOVE ALL PVMTS., INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL, TYP. REMOVE ALL WALLS, STEPS, TIMBERS & CURBS, INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL & FOOTINGS,TYP. REMOVE ALL PVMTS., INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL, TYP. REMOVE ALL WALLS, TIMBERS & CURBS, INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL & FOOTINGS, TYP. REMOVE ALL PVMTS., INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING TREES, SHRUBS, UNDERBRUSH & DEBRIS, INCLUDING ALL AND ROOT BALLS & UNDERGROUND PLANT STRUCTURE, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING WATER AND SEWER SERVICES IN PROPERTY LINE CAP AND ABANDON SERVICES. SERVICE LOCATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER PROTECT PROPERTY CORNER EXISTING GAS LINE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED BY OTHERS (P.O.B.) A Point 552.5 feet NW'ly of the SW Corner of Lot 16 ("Point A") Li n e P a r a l l e l w i t h NW ' l y L i n e o f L o t 1 6 S'ly Right-of-Way Line of Soo Line Railroad Point of Beginning Li n e P a r a l l e l w i t h NW ' l y L i n e o f L o t 1 6 pe r f o u n d m o n u m e n t a t i o n 30.8 3 . 6 15.8 1 3 . 4 6.2 2 4 . 2 22.5 3 . 8 12.5 0 . 7 17.6 1 0 . 9 0.3 2 6 . 7 4 0 . 2 28.5 4 0 . 3 28.3 Fire Pit Stone Wall Bituminou s Driveway Deck HAMEL ROAD S73°12'09"E 290.00 S1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 8 " W 3 1 7 . 3 4 N74°53'27"W 290.00 N1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 6 " E 3 2 5 . 8 9 2 Story H o u s e 342 Hame l R d Foundatio n A r e a = 1,899 S.F . Block Wall B l o c k W a l l Pavers Pavers Edge of Woods (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Block Wall Garage Access PID: 12118234 2 0 0 1 5 PID: 12118234 2 0 0 1 6 Address Unassigne d [A] Sidewalk Crosses Property Line 16" WM 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E REMOVALS LEGEND: TREE PROTECTION REMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL, INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS. REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALL FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS. TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . Know what's below.before you dig.Call R EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF IN RIGHT-OF-WAY, COORDINATE WITH LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT. REMOVAL NOTES: 1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 3.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 4.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 5.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS. 6.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 7.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS. 8.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. 9.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 10.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. 11.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 12.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 13.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 14.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 15.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 16.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 17.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 18.ALL EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC/REGULATORY SIGNAGE TO BE INVENTORIED AND IF REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETURNED TO LGU. 19.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CITY OF MEDINA REMOVAL NOTES: 1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.6 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: DL TREE PROTECTION N T S 25' DRIPLINE WIDTH FURNISH A AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIP LINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SHOWN ON PLAN, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. WHERE POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25' BEYOND DRIP LINE. PLACE TREE PROTECTION SIGN ON POSTS, ONE PER INDIVIDUAL TREE (FACING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY), OR ONE EVERY 100' LF ALONG A GROVE OR MULTI-TREE PROTECTION AREA. POSTS AND FENCING EXTEND FENCE 25' BEYOND DRIPLINE WHERE POSSIBLE TREE PROTECTION SIGN, TYP. TREE DRIPLINE, OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 1 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DN DN DN DN DN A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 19.0'24.0' 24.0'19.1'49.2' 49.1' 14 . 0 ' 1.0'39.0'12.0' 24.0' 39.0'1.0' 24.5' 20 8 . 1 ' 18 3 . 0 ' 104.0' 30 . 2 ' 2. 0 ' 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K 6.2' 9.7' 14:45 Request co n t r o l 30 . 2 ' 39.0' 19.3'18.6' 9. 5 ' GANG MAILBOX 12'X12' GAZEBO STRUCTURE, INSTALL PER MANUF. 6' HEIGHT WOOD PRIVACY FENCING 25 . 4 ' 14.6' 20 . 5 ' 13.7' 9.2'5. 7 ' 4. 8 ' 24.5' 13.7' CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON PER CITY STANDARDS, TYP. BIT. PVMT., TYP PROPOSED 4 UNIT BUILDING BIT. PVMT., TYP PROPOSED 4 UNIT BUILDING PR O P O S E D 8 U N I T B U I L D I N G PR O P O S E D 8 U N I T B U I L D I N G PR O P O S E D 6 U N I T B U I L D I N G SNOW STORAGE 8 CONCRETE SIDEWALK PVMT.STRIPING, TYP. BIT. PVMT., TYP MATCH EXIST. CURB PER CITY STANDARD MATCH EXIST. CURB PER CITY STANDARD ZONING: (CH-RR) COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY RAILROAD ZONING: (UR) URBAN RESIDENTIAL B612 C&G SURMOUNTABLE C&G B612 C&G SNOW STORAGE CONCRETE PATH PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT R 1 6 . 0 ' R20 . 0 ' 10.0' 6.0' 11.6'24.0'12.3'C.I.P. CONC STEPS & PAVER WALK, SEE GRADING PLAN, TYP. THICKENED EDGE PATIO 24 . 0 ' SEG. RET. WALL STEPS, PER MANUF. DESIGN & LAYOUT SEG. RET. WALL. STEP T.O.W. DOWN WITH STEP LAYOUT, MIN 12" ABOVE ADJ. ADJACENT STEP SEG. RET. WALL. MAINTAIN CONSTANT T.O.W. ELEV. ON THIS SIDE OF STEPS 13.7' 0. 7 ' 5. 0 ' 19 . 0 ' 19 . 0 ' 2. 0 ' 2. 0 ' 3.0' 3.0' 3.4' 1. 0 ' 5. 0 ' THICKENED EDGE PATIO THICKENED EDGE PATIO THICKENED EDGE PATIO THICKENED EDGE PATIO THICKENED EDGE PATIO PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED CURB (FUTURE, BY OTHERS)PROPOSED CURB (FUTURE, BY OTHERS) EOF EOF PROPOSED PAVING AREA (FUTURE, BY OTHERS) PROPOSED PAVING AREA (FUTURE, BY OTHERS) 54 . 5 ' 49 . 1 ' 48 . 2 ' 54 . 0 ' 5' ROD IRON FENCE PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK 11 . 5 ' BIT. PVMT., TYP SURMOUNTABLE C&G 9. 2 ' 15 6 . 1 ' R2 8 . 0 'R24.0' 39.0'12.0' 38 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 14 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 14 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 14 . 0 ' R3.0 ' 38 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 14 . 0 ' 14 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 8.7' 8.6' 19.4'49.4' 104.0' 14 . 0 ' 14 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' SNOWSTORAGE 18.9' 21 . 3 ' 18.9' 21 . 3 ' 18 . 9 ' 21.3' 18 . 9 ' 21.3' 18 . 9 ' 21.3' 9.0' DOG WASTE STATION SURMOUNTABLE C&G VALLEY GUTTER VALLEY GUTTER SURMOUNTABLE C&G SURMOUNTABLE C&G PEDESTRIAN RAMPS NO PARKING FIRE LANE NO PARKING FIRE LANE NO PARKING FIRE LANE NO PARKING FIRE LANE 5' ROD IRON FENCE 5' ROD IRON FENCE HAMEL ROAD Pavers Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 12" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l (A Public R/W) 16" WM 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C2.0 SITE PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . SITE AREA TABLE: 1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS. 6.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 7.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. 9.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL. 10.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. 11.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL. 12.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 14.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS. 15.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 16.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP. 17.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 18.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS. 19.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SITE LAYOUT NOTES: SITE PLAN LEGEND: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED. HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGN NP = NO PARKING FIRE LANE ST = STOP CP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY Know what's below.before you dig.Call R CONCRETE PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEE DETAIL. PROPERTY LINE CURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUT GUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLAN LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE). SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL. HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE). SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TO PERVIOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) - CONCRETE PAVER PERVIOUS SYSTEM. INCLUDE ALL BASE MATERIAL AND APPURTENANCES AS SPECIFIED PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS. MAKE: BELGARD, OR EQUIVILANT MODEL: AQUASTONE, OR EQUIVILANT COLOR: T.B.D. - PROVIDE SAMPLES, SHOP DRAWINGS & PRODUCT DATA REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SPECIALTY PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) - PROVIDE BID FOR THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS, INCLUDE VARIATIONS OF BASE MATERIAL AND OTHER NECESSARY COMPONENTS. 1. STAMPED & COLORED CONCRETE 2. CONCRETE PAVERS MAKERS, COLORS, MODELS, & PATTERN TO BE INCLUDED IN SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. OPERATIONAL NOTES: TRASH: TRASH RECEPTACLES IN GARAGE CITY OF MEDINA SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES. ACCESSIBILITY ARROW (IF APPLICABLE) DO NOT PAINT. 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N ZONING NOTES: 1.CURRENT ZONING: UPTOWN HAMEL (UH) 2.PROPOSED ZONING: UPTOWN HAMEL (UH) 3.THE GROSS LAND AREA IS 93,259 +/- SQUARE FEET OR 2.14 +/- ACRES. 4.DENSITY: AT LEAST 10 RESIDENTIAL UNITS PER NET ACRE. PROPOSED UNITS = 30 5.SETBACKS: FRONT YARD: 0 FT SIDE YARD: 8 FT REAR YARD: 20 FT REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 24.5' 104.0' 4. 8 ' 24.5' PROPOSED 4 UNIT BUILDING CONCRETE SIDEWALK MATCH EXIST. CURB PER CITY STANDARD ZONING: (UR) URBAN RESIDENTIAL 6.0' 11.6'C.I.P. CONC STEPS & PAVER WALK, SEE GRADING PLAN, TYP. THICKENED EDGE PATIO 1. 0 ' 5. 0 ' PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED CURB (FUTURE, BY OTHERS) PROPOSED PAVING AREA (FUTURE, BY OTHERS)48 . 2 ' 54 . 0 ' PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK 18.9' 21 . 3 ' B618 C&G MATCH EXIST. CURB PER CITYSTANDARD MATCH EXIST. CURB PER CITY STANDARD PROPOSED PAVING AREA. PER CITY STANDARDS MATCH EXISTING NO PARKING FIRE LANE HAMEL ROAD Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 12" RCP 8" PVC 12" WM 1 5 " R C P Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l (A Public R/W) 8" PVC 16" WM 12" WM 16" WM Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C2.1 SITE PLAN OFFSITE . . . . . . . . . . . . Know what's below.before you dig.Call R 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DN DN DN DN DN A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF EOF R2 8 . 0 'R24.0' 4. 4 5 % 0. 4 0 % 1. 6 5 % 4. 6 5 % 3. 8 8 % 3. 6 3 % 2. 0 0 % 6.70% 7.00% 7.00 % 2. 5 7 % 0.50% 4 . 0 5 % 4 . 0 6 % 6. 6 0 % 7. 4 0 % 2 . 3 0 % 1.47% 0.73% 0.52% 7. 6 0 % 6 . 7 % 4 . 1 4 % 1. 7 6 % 4. 9 3 % 7.46% 3.25% 6.92% 3.03% 6.35% 2.58% 3.46% 2.03% 2.08% 1.89% 6.48% 1.75% 7.08% 3.13% 7.59% 3.15% 2.09% 6.89% 2.82% 7.52% 3.36% 7.94% 3.90% 7.52% 1.16%1.14% 0. 7 1 % 1. 6 0 % 2 . 7 2 % 2 . 8 5 % 2.4 7 % 2.5 1 % 4 3 . 2 2 % 5. 3 1 % 6. 5 7 % 13. 5 7 % 30.00 % 1 5 . 2 8 % 4 . 0 0 % 2 . 0 0 % 3.29% HAMEL ROAD S73°12'09"E 290.00 S1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 8 " W 3 1 7 . 3 4 N74°53'27"W 290.00 N1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 6 " E 3 2 5 . 8 9 Pavers Pavers 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l Access PID: 12118234 2 0 0 1 5 PID: 12118234 2 0 0 1 6 Address Unassigne d [A] Sidewalk Crosses Property Line 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C3.0 GRADING PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 4.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 5.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 6.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:1 9.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES. 11.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE. 12.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. 13.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK. 14.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10' OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS. 15. TOLERANCES 15.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 15.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 15.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. 15.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. 16.MAINTENANCE 16.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS. 16.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED. 16.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION. GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL GRADING PLAN LEGEND: SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTER SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRS GROUNDWATER INFORMATION: CITY OF MEDINA GRADING NOTES: 1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES. SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.6 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: Know what's below.before you dig.Call R EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT) EMERGENCY OVERFLOWEOF=1135.52 TO PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY XXXXX, INC., DATED XX-XX-XX GROUNDWATER WAS OBSERVED AT ELEVATIONS RANGING FROM XXX.XX TO XXX.XX THE BORINGS & GROUNDWATER ARE AS FOLLOWS: SB-1 XXX.XX SB-2 XXX.XX SB-3 XXX.XX SB-4 XXX.XX PROPOSED FOOTING DRAIN TILE INVERT ELEVATION = XXX.XX SPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTING GRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N LOW FLOOR ELEVATION GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF BLOCK (FOUNDATION) ELEVATION RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DN DN DN DN DN A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF EOF R2 8 . 0 'R24.0' HAMEL ROAD Pavers Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l 16" WM 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E PROPOSED GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX 8" DIP WATER 8" DIP WATER STUB TO WITHIN 10' FROM BUILDING, COORD. W/MECH'L TYP. CONNECT TO EXISTING 6" PVC WATERMAIN STUB. COORD. WITH CITY WHERE WATER CROSSES STORM OR SANITARY, MAINTAIN 18" SEPARATION AND INCLUDE 4" RIGID INSULATION, TYP. 1.5" COPPER WATER SERVICE W/CURB STOP AND BOX, TYP. HYDRANT & G.V., TYP. PROPOSED GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX 8" DIP WATER 3. 0 0 ' TY P . 3.00'TYP. 3. 0 0 ' TY P . 3. 0 0 ' TY P . 10' TYP. 10.00' TYP. PROP. WATER CROSSES EXIS.STORM, MAINTAIN 18" SEPARATION AND INCLUDE 4" RIGID INSULATION, TYP. HYDRANT & G.V., TYP. HYDRANT & G.V., TYP. STUB TO WITHIN 10' FROM BUILDING, COORD. W/MECH'L 1.5" COPPER WATER SERVICE W/CURB STOP AND BOX, TYP. STUB TO WITHIN 10' FROM BUILDING, COORD. W/MECH'L TYP. SANMH 4B RE= 1001.02± INV=990.70 SANMH 4 RE= 1005.24 IE(N/E)=989.84 IE(W=989.74 SANMH 3 RE= 1006.30 IE(W)= 992.22 IE(N)=992.32 IE(E)=994.22 SANMH 3B RE= 1001.50 IE(NE)=993.30 IE(S)= 993.20 STUB 4" SANITARY SERVICE TO 5' FROM BUILDING COORD. W/MECH'L TYP. 216 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% 103 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 2.18% 219 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% SANMH 3A RE= 1006.63 IE= 994.47 SANMH 5 RE= 1005.27 IE(E)= 989.42 IE(S)=989.32 SANMH 7 RE= 1005.72 IE(N)= 989.07 IE(W)=988.97 80 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% 62 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% 202 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 2.05% 62 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% SANITARY STUB IE=994.42 30 LF 8" PVC SDR26 SANITARY @0.40% 8"X8"X6" TEE 22.5° AND 11.25° BEND 45° AND 11.25° BEND 45° AND 11.25° BEND22.5° AND 11.25° BEND 8"X8"X8" TEE 8"X8"X8" TEE 45° AND 22.5° BEND 45° BEND CROSSING INFO IE SANITARY=901.23 TOP STORM=987.72 8" TO 6" REDUCER 8" TO 6" REDUCER 6" DIP WATER SAN. WYE STA=2+08.9 SAN. WYE IE=990.68 SAN. STUB IE=991.52 CURB STOP ELEV.=1001.65 SAN. WYE STA=1+93.3 SAN. WYE IE=990.61 SAN. STUB IE=991.45 CURB STOP ELEV.=1001.72 SAN. WYE STA=1+64.5 SAN. WYE IE=990.50 SAN. STUB IE=991.34 CURB STOP ELEV.=1002.63 SAN. WYE STA=1+41.4 SAN. WYE IE=990.41 SAN. STUB IE=991.25 CURB STOP ELEV.=1002.71 SAN. WYE STA=1+12.6 SAN. WYE IE=990.29 SAN. STUB IE=991.13 CURB STOP ELEV.=1003.60 SAN. WYE STA=0+92.2 SAN. WYE IE=990.21 SAN. STUB IE=991.05 CURB STOP ELEV.=1003.60 SAN. WYE STA=0+57.6 SAN. WYE IE=990.07 SAN. STUB IE=990.91 CURB STOP ELEV.=1004.38 SAN. WYE STA=0+37.2 SAN. WYE IE=989.99 SAN. STUB IE=990.83 CURB STOP ELEV.=1004.57 SAN. WYE STA=2+12.9 SAN. WYE IE=993.17 SAN. STUB IE=994.05 CURB STOP ELEV.=1002.47 SAN. WYE STA=1+64.4 SAN. WYE IE=992.98 SAN. STUB IE=993.84 CURB STOP ELEV.=1003.51 SAN. WYE STA=1+41.3 SAN. WYE IE=992.89 SAN. STUB IE=993.75 CURB STOP ELEV.=1003.62 SAN. WYE STA=1+08.7 SAN. WYE IE=992.76 SAN. STUB IE=993.61 CURB STOP ELEV.=1004.51 SAN. WYE STA=0+90.7 SAN. WYE IE=992.68 SAN. STUB IE=993.52 CURB STOP ELEV.=1004.60 SAN. WYE STA=0+58.2 SAN. WYE IE=992.55 SAN. STUB IE=993.38 CURB STOP ELEV.=1005.52 SAN. WYE STA=0+40.4 SAN. WYE IE=992.48 SAN. STUB IE=993.31 CURB STOP ELEV.=1005.64 SAN. WYE STA=1+75.2 SAN. WYE IE=993.02 SAN. STUB IE=994.00 CURB STOP ELEV.=1002.77 SAN. WYE STA=1+54.4 SAN. WYE IE=992.94 SAN. STUB IE=993.93 CURB STOP ELEV.=1002.77 SAN. WYE STA=1+21.6 SAN. WYE IE=992.81 SAN. STUB IE=993.81 CURB STOP ELEV.=1003.78 SAN. WYE STA=1+01.1 SAN. WYE IE=992.72 SAN. STUB IE=993.72 CURB STOP ELEV.=1003.84 SAN. WYE STA=0+68.8 SAN. WYE IE=992.60 SAN. STUB IE=993.61 CURB STOP ELEV.=1004.80 SAN. WYE STA=0+47.9 SAN. WYE IE=992.52 SAN. STUB IE=993.54 CURB STOP ELEV.=1004.92 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 3 4 . 9 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 8 9 . 5 6 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 0 . 1 6 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 5 . 8 5 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 5 3 . 3 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 8 9 . 6 3 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 0 . 2 3 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 5 . 6 0 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 7 7 . 3 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 8 9 . 7 3 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 0 . 3 3 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 5 . 5 7 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 2 4 . 6 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 8 9 . 9 4 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 0 . 5 4 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 5 . 4 7 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 9 6 . 9 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 9 0 . 2 3 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 0 . 8 1 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 6 . 4 4 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 7 . 7 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 9 4 . 2 5 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 4 . 8 2 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 6 . 5 4 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 4 1 . 0 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 9 4 . 3 8 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 4 . 9 5 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 6 . 5 9 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 5 5 . 4 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 9 4 . 4 4 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 5 . 0 0 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 6 . 7 4 SAN. WYE STA=1+95.2 SAN. WYE IE=993.10 SAN. STUB IE=993.97 CURB STOP ELEV.=1002.58 STUB 4" SANITARY SERVICE TO 5' FROM BUILDING COORD. W/MECH'L TYP. 1.5" COPPER WATER SERVICE W/CURB STOP AND BOX, TYP. 8"X8"X8" TEE PROPOSED GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX 3.00' TYP. Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C4.0 UTILITY PLAN SANITARY & WATER . . . . . . . . . . . . GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: UTILITY LEGEND: CITY OF MEDINA UTILITY NOTES: 1.THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED ASSOCIATED WITH VARIATIONS IN THE UTILITY ASBUILT PLANS, ELEVATIONS 0R LOCATIONS. 2.WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5' OF COVER. 3.THE CITY REQUIRES TELEVISING FOR SANITARY SEWER PIPE INSTALLATIONS PRIOR TO ACCEPTING A WARRANTY FOR THE UTILITY SYSTEMS; PROVIDE REPORT AND VIDEO FILES TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW. 4.MAINTAIN 18'INCH SEPARATION, 4" RIGID INSULATION AT ANY LOCATION WHERE STORM OR SANITARY SEWER CROSSES WATERMAIN. Know what's below.before you dig.Call R CATCH BASIN GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATER MAIN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT MANHOLE FES AND RIP RAP 1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 4.UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 5.CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. 6.ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION. 10.UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. 11.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 12.ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13.HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL. 14.A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL. 15.A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 16.ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED. 18.COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 19.COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 20.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 21.ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 22.2CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. 23.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. 24.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES. 26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0. 27.FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS 25' IN EACH DIRECTION. SEE PLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALL LOW POINT DRAIN TILE PER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201 G11 A201 A6 INLET PROTECTION AT CATCH BASINS, TYP 7. 6 0 % 13. 5 7 % Pavers 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 12" RCP 8" PVC 12" WM 1 5 " R C P Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l 8" PVC 16" WM 12" WM 16" WM WHERE WATER CROSSES STORM OR SANITARY, MAINTAIN 18" SEPARATION AND INCLUDE 4" RIGID INSULATION, TYP. IE(E)= 989.42 IE(S)=989.32 SANMH 7 RE= 1005.72 IE(N)= 989.07 IE(W)=988.97 SANMH 8 RE= 996.20 IE(E)= 984.83 IE(S)=984.73 62 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% 202 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 2.05% 39 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.75% MAKE CORE DRILL CONNECTION TO EXISTING SAN. MH EX RE=995.84 EX IE (SE)=984.34 EX IE (NW)=984.32 PR. IE (NE)=984.44 CROSSING INFO IE SANITARY=901.23 TOP STORM=987.72 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 3 4 . 9 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 8 9 . 5 6 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 0 . 1 6 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 5 . 8 5 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 5 3 . 3 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 8 9 . 6 3 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 0 . 2 3 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 5 . 6 0 Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C4.1 UTILITY PLAN SANITARY & WATER OFFSITE . . . . . . . . . . . . UTILITY LEGEND: Know what's below.before you dig.Call R CATCH BASIN GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATER MAIN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT MANHOLE FES AND RIP RAP 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DN DN DN DN DN A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF EOF HAMEL ROAD Pavers Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 18" RCP 12" RCP 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l Railroad Tracks (A Public R/W) 16" WM 12" WM 16" WM 12" WM 16" WM 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E R 2 5 0 . 0 0 R 2 5 0 . 0 0 R25 0 . 0 0 Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C4.2 UTILITY PLAN HYDRANT SPACING . . . . . . . . . . . . Know what's below.before you dig.Call R 0 1" = 30'-0" 30'-0"15'-0" N RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DN DN DN DN DN A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF EOF R2 8 . 0 'R24.0' HAMEL ROAD Pavers Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l 16" WM 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E 120" CMP UNDERGROUND FILTRATION SYSTEM 24.50'X67' FOOTPRINT (INCL. SIDE AND END STONE) ACCESS RIM=1000.95± TOP OF PIPE=999.00 IE 12" OUTLET=994.60 PIPE IE=989.00 18" SAND BASE IE=987.50 6" PERF. DRAINTILE IE=987.50 100-YR HWL=999.13 100-YR B2B HWL=999.18 67LF 18" RCP @ 0.50%45 LF 18" HDPE @ 4.13% 62 LF 18" RCP @ 0.50% 4" FLEXIBLE PERFORATED DRAINTILE IE=998.00 0.00% SLOPE 13 LF 15" HDPE @ 9.31% 15" INLET IE=995.00 6" PVC DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION LINE @ 2.00% (TYP.) 12" INLET IE=995.00 MH 21 RE=1009.00 IE=1006.26 8" NYLOPLAST AREA DRAIN W/ SQUARE GRATE, TYP., POSITION AT DOWNSPOUT DISCHARGES, COORD. W/ ARCHITECTURE. MH 22 RE=1009.00 IE=1005.76 MH 24 RE=1010.50 IE=1004.74 MH 34 RE=1003.85 IE=1000.71 CBMH 36 RE=1002.51 IE=998.94 MH 37 RE=1001.90 IE=997.30 SUMP=993.30 15" INLET IE=995.00 6 LF 15" HDPE @ 2.00% 5 LF 15" HDPE @ 2.00% 37 LF 12" PVC STORM @ 6.22% MH 33 RE=1005.75 IE=1002.27 MH 32 RE=1007.75 IE=1002.79 MH 31 RE=1009.75 IE=1003.22 MH 30 RE=1005.97 IE=1003.35 MH 29 RE=1007.22 IE=1003.77 CBMH 28 RE=1010.50 IE=1003.98 CBMH 27 RE=1010.50 IE=1004.13 MH 26 RE=1010.50 IE=1004.19 MH 23 RE=1010.50 IE=1005.24 50 LF 6" PVC @ 1.00% 52 LF 8" PVC @ 1.00% 50 LF 8" PVC @ 1.00% 50 LF 8" PVC @ 1.00% 5 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% 15 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% 21 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% 13 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% 43 LF 12" PVC @ 1.00% 52 LF 12" PVC @ 1.00% 52 LF 12" PVC @ 3.00% 51LF 12" PVC @ 3.00% 66LF 12" PVC @ 2.48% 42 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% 15" OUTLET IE=994.60 10 LF 15" HDPE @ 1.00% DRAWDOWN RISER BAFFLE WALL , TYP. TOP=991.00 ACCESS RISER, TYP. MH 20 RE=1009.00 IE=1006.76 50 LF 6" PVC @ 1.00% AD20 AD21 AD22 AD23 AD24 AD25 AD31 AD32 AD33 AD34 AD35 CLEANOUT, TYP MH 35 RE=1002.80 IE=999.18 8LF 12" PVC @ 3.00% 40 LF 15" HDPE @ 2.00% MH 25 RE=1010.50 IE=1004.24 6 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% STMH 2 RIM=989.81 IE=985.33 CBMH 4 RIM=999.96 IE (DT)=998.00 IE(E/W)=985.64FES 1 IE=985.00 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 5 RE=1000.83 IE (E, 15")=994.50 IE (W, 18")=987.50 12" ORIFICE=994.60 12" ORIFICE=995.40 WEIR WALL=998.70 IE (DT)=987.50 48" CBMH 5A RE=1000.26 IE=996.33 48" CBMH 6 RE=1000.54 IE=995.00 SUMP IE=991.00 60" CBMH 5 RE=1000.26 IE=996.21 SUMP IE=992.21 INSTALL CONTECH JELLYFISH FILTER 48" CB 6A RE=1000.54 IE=995.12 FUTURE CBMH 11 RE=1009.43 IE=1000.86 CONSTRUCT OVER EXISTING STORM SEWER STUB 2" SUMP PUMP DISCHARGE TO WITHIN 10' FROM BUILDING, COORD. W/MECH'L CLEANOUT, TYP. IE=1000.05 4" HDPE SUMP DISCHARGE, TYP. 186 LF 6" HDPE @ 2.00% 48" CBMH 5B RE=1000.90 IE=997.13 Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C4.3 UTILITY PLAN STORMWATER . . . . . . . . . . . . GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: UTILITY LEGEND: CITY OF MEDINA UTILITY NOTES: 1.THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED ASSOCIATED WITH VARIATIONS IN THE UTILITY ASBUILT PLANS, ELEVATIONS 0R LOCATIONS. 2.WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5' OF COVER. 3.THE CITY REQUIRES TELEVISING FOR SANITARY SEWER PIPE INSTALLATIONS PRIOR TO ACCEPTING A WARRANTY FOR THE UTILITY SYSTEMS; PROVIDE REPORT AND VIDEO FILES TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW. 4.MAINTAIN 18'INCH SEPARATION, 4" RIGID INSULATION AT ANY LOCATION WHERE STORM OR SANITARY SEWER CROSSES WATERMAIN. Know what's below.before you dig.Call R CATCH BASIN GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATER MAIN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT MANHOLE FES AND RIP RAP 1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 4.UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 5.CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. 6.ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION. 10.UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. 11.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 12.ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13.HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL. 14.A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL. 15.A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 16.ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED. 18.COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 19.COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 20.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 21.ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 22.2CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. 23.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. 24.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES. 26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0. 27.FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS 25' IN EACH DIRECTION. SEE PLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALL LOW POINT DRAIN TILE PER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C5.0 CIVIL DETAILS . . . . . . . . . . . . Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C5.1 CIVIL DETAILS . . . . . . . . . . . . Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C5.2 CIVIL DETAILS . . . . . . . . . . . . Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C5.3 CIVIL DETAILS . . . . . . . . . . . . Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C5.4 CIVIL DETAILS . . . . . . . . . . . . Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C5.5 CIVIL DETAILS . . . . . . . . . . . . TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL STREET 24' (FACE TO FACE) 2/1 2 / 1 2.5% 12.0' F-F 4: 1 M a x R.O.W. 2.0% (12.67' B-B) 2.5% SIDEWALK EASEMENT 2.0% 40.0' ROW 12.0' F-F (12.67' B-B) TYPICAL NOTES: 1. SECTIONS ARE THE MINIMUM THICKNESS REQUIRED FOR A LOCAL STREET. ALL STREETS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 4" BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION AND 6" OF CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE. 2. DESIGN SHALL BE BASED ON SOIL BORINGS R-VALUE DETERMINED BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING COMPANY. 3. LOCAL STREET SECTION SHALL BE 7-TON DESIGN WITH ALL OTHER STREET CLASSIFICATIONS TO BE 9 OR 10 TON DESIGN PER MNDOT. 4. TACK COAT SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN BITUMINOUS LIFTS. THE FACE OF THE CONCRETE GUTTER SHALL BE TACKED PRIOR TO EACH BITUMINOUS LIFT. THE STREET SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TO PLACING THE TACK COAT. GRADING NOTES: 1. IN AREAS OF FILL, BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED PER SOIL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND STRUCTURALLY BUILT WITH A 1:1 SLOPE MAX EXTENDING FROM 2' BEHIND THE CURB OUTWARDS FOR OVERSIZING. 2. ALL ORGANIC OR UNSUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BENEATH THE ROADWAY. 1.5" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (MNDOT 2360-SPWEA34OB), TYP. TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357), TYP. 2" BITUMINOUS NON-WEARING COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPNWB330B) 8" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE (MNDOT SPEC. 2211) OR RECYCLED BASE, CLASS 7 (MNDOT SPEC. 3138) EXISTING COMPACTED GRANULAR SUBGRADE PROFILE GRADE SODDED BLVD 6" SUMP DRAIN PIPE (SEE DETAIL) 6" CONCRETE WALK 4" CLASS 5 BASE LC D-412 CONC CURB & GUTTER MIN. 3" AGGREGATE BASE BELOW C&G 4:1 M a x R.O.W. 2.0% SIDEWALK EASEMENT 2.0% SODDED BLVD 6" CONCRETE WALK 4" CLASS 5 BASE TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL STREET SECTION - 24' FACE TO FACE WITH D-412 SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER N T S6 BUILDING PAD - ROW-HOME - FLAT PAD N T S 20'45' BUILDING PAD (TYP.) 5' OVERSIZING (TYP.) 5' OVERSIZING (TYP.) BU I L D I N G L I N E BU I L D I N G L I N E 10.0' 1:1 S L O P E COMPACTED STRUCTURAL BACKFILL CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE SOIL MATERIAL AS REQUIRED BY SOILS ENGINEER. TOP OF STABLE SUBSOIL (PER SOILS ENGINEER) (PER SOILS ENGINEER) BACK OF CURB GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. 1. 5 ' HO L D D O W N GRADE ELEVATION / GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 2.0% MIN 0.5' TOPSOIL HOLD DOWN GRADE FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE LOW FLOOR ELEV. 0.5' GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. NOTE:1. THE DESIGNATED HOLD DOWN SHALL BE COMPLETED ACROSS THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE LOT (SIDE LOTLINE TO SIDE LOTLINE) 2. THE SOIL CORRECTION SHALL BE COMPLETED ACROSS THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE LOT (SIDE LOTLINE TO SIDE LOTLINE) GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. 0.5' 2.0% MIN 1. 5 ' HO L D D O W N FINISHED GRADE 10.0% MIN 33.0% MAX 7BUILDING PAD - ROW-HOME - FLAT PAD N T S 20'38' 15' OVERSIZING (TYP.) 5' OVERSIZING (TYP.) 11'-15' BU I L D I N G L I N E BU I L D I N G L I N E (VARIES) 1:1 S L O P E COMPACTED STRUCTURAL BACKFILL CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE SOIL MATERIAL AS REQUIRED BY SOILS ENGINEER. TOP OF STABLE SUBSOIL (PER SOILS ENGINEER) (PER SOILS ENGINEER) BACK OF CURB GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. SIDEWALK 4' 0. 5 ' HO L D D O W N GRADE ELEVATION / GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 2.0% MIN 0.5' TOPSOIL HOLD DOWN GRADE FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE LOW FLOOR ELEV. 0.5' GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. NOTE:1. THE DESIGNATED HOLD DOWN SHALL BE COMPLETED ACROSS THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE LOT (SIDE LOTLINE TO SIDE LOTLINE) 2. THE SOIL CORRECTION SHALL BE COMPLETED ACROSS THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE LOT (SIDE LOTLINE TO SIDE LOTLINE) GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. NO HOLD DOWN 2.0% MIN 0. 5 ' HO L D D O W N FINISHED GRADE 3 Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C5.6 CIVIL DETAILS . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 " T Y P . NOTES: 1. POST, FABRIC, AND RAILS, SHALL BE BLACK PVC COATED. 2. FENCE SHALL BE 4' HIGH 3. FABRIC SHALL BE ON OUTSIDE OF FENCE. 4. FABRIC SHALL BE KNUCKLED ALONG TOP AND BOTTOM EDGES. 12" DIA. (TYP.) 6" 4' - 0 " 10'-0" O.C. (MAX.) 4" 2" ( M A X ) CHAIN LINK FENCE N T S TOP OF CHAIN LINK FASTENERS AT 18" INTERVALS TOP AND BOTTOM TOP RAIL LINE POST SLOPE TOP OF FOOTING TO DRAIN CORNER POST OR TERMINAL POST BAR BANDS AT 12" INTERVALS CENTER RAIL AT CORNER AND FOR ALL FENCE ENDS. STRETCHER BAR BOTTOM RAIL FINISH GRADE 1 6" 4" 12" DIA. (TYP.) 1' - 6 " 6" 1' - 6 " 6"4" NOTES: 1. INSERT PVC SLATS COMPATIBLE WITH GAUGE OF FABRIC. PROVIDE COLOR SAMPLES TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL BY THE OWNER. 2. SUBMIT COLOR AND GAUGE SAMPLES OF FABRIC TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2 CHAIN LINK DOUBLE-LEAF SWING GATE N T S 6" DIA. (DOUBLE LEAF GATE ONLY) BLACK STAINLESS STEELTIES AS SPECIFIED AT 18" INTERVALS STRETCHER BAR GATE POST 4" NOM.OD. STEEL OR EQUAL BAR BANDS AT 12" INTERVALS TRUSS ROD TURNBUCKLE (3" TAKEUP) BRACE TUBE 58" ROUND LATCH ROD (DOUBLE LEAF GATE ONLY) 4 6' PRIVACY WOOD FENCE N T S SECTION DETAIL 7'-10" SECTION WIDTH CTR TO CTR 10 " 14" 5'4' - 6 " FENCE SECTION ELEVATION 6" FENCE BOARD (1" (NOM.) CEDAR) 2' - 3 " 10 " 2' - 3 " PLAN 6' NOTES: 1. FOOTING DIAMETER TO BE 14". MINIMUM DEPTH 60". 2. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE NOMINAL FOR WOOD. 3. FIELD VERIFY AND MATCH SIZE AND MATERIAL OF EXISTING BOARDS, POSTS, AND RAILS. 1-1/2" CHAMFER 6X6 POST 2X4 FENCE RAIL 3" x 3" x 1" L-BRACKET (1/8" STEEL) WITH 4 - 2-1/2" GALVANIZED SCREWS 6" 3' - 6 " 2' - 6 " 60 " - 6 6 " FR O M P A V E M E N T T O BO T T O M O F S I G N 1/ 2 " ACCESSIBLE SIGN AND POST N T S 1'-6" NOTE: 1. SIGN SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED. 2. BOTTOM OF SIGNS TO BE MOUNTED 60"-66" FROM PARKING GRADE, SEE SIGN POST INSTALLATION DETAIL 3. VERIFY POST PAINT C0LOR WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 14" METAL PLATE WELDED TO BOTTOM OF 6” PIPE COMPOUND FILL ANNULAR SPACE TO 1" FROM TOP WITH SILICA SAND MATERIAL VARIES, SEE PLAN & DETAILS 10° SLOPE, TYP. ALL AROUND 1" SILICONE RUBBER OR ASPHALTIC CAULKING COMPOUND 6" O.D. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE PAINTED WITH 1 COAT OF APPROPRIATE PRIMER AND TWO COATS SIGN ENAMEL. FILL ANNULAR SPACE WITH GROUT. COVER WITH YELLOW "IDEAL SHIELD" PLASTIC COVER. GREEN POWDER COATED STEEL SQUARE POST AS SPECIFIED METAL SIGN ACCORDING TO MN STATE CODE GALVANIZED STEEL FASTENER (TYP. OF 2) EXTEND POST PAST TOP OF POST 3 ACCESSIBLE PARKING PAVEMENT MARKING N T S NO PARKING NOTE: 1. ADHERE TO ALL STATE & FEDERAL ADA STANDARDS FOR PARKING, PAINT & SIGNAGE. 2. VERIFY AND LAYOUT ALL PAINTED FORMS & STRIPING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION 3. SEE PLAN FOR ACTUAL PARKING SPACES LAYOUT 4. ALL PAINT COLORS MUST CONFORM TO STATE AND FEDERAL ADA STANDARDS NO PARKING NO PARKING 4" WIDE PAINTED STRIPING, 45° CROSS STRIPE PATTERN AT 2' O.C. AT ACCESS AISLE FACE OF CURB ADJ. SIDEWALK ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP. SEE GRADING & DETAILS HANDICAP SIGN, CENTERED AT HEAD OF PARKING SPACE AND ACCESS AISLE 2' MIN,. AND 8' MAX. FROM FACE OF CURB HANDICAP PARKING ACCESS AISLE WITH PAINTED 12" HIGH LETTERING OF "NO PARKING" CENTEREDTOWARD DRIVE AISLE NO PARKING SIGN CENTERED ATHEAD OF SPACE ON CENTER STRIPE HANDICAP PARKING SPACE WITH PAINTED INTERNATIONALSYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY WITH CONTRASTING SQUAREBACKGROUND, CENTERED TOWARD DRIVE AISLE NOTE: FOR REFERENCE ONLY, USE STANDARD ADA PVMT. PAINT TEMPLATE 6" RADIUS 12" DIAMETER 6" LINE WIDTH FOR FIGURE 6" LINE WIDTH OUTSIDE BORDER 5'-6" SQUARE OVERALL 18" RADIUS "WHEEL" SHAPE PAINTED SYMBOL DIAGRAM 8' MIN.8' MIN.8' MIN. PE R C I T Y C O D E 5 5" FINISHED GRADE OR ADJ. PAVEMENT 24" FINISHED GRADEFINISHED GRADE LE S S T H A N 4 ' H E I G H T . SE E G R A D I N G P L A N VA R I E S NATIVE SOIL 6 SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL N T S 42 " N O M . 4' - 0 " MI N . NOTES: 1. THESE SECTIONS ARE FOR ESTIMATING PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CERTIFIED DRAWING BY A MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ON STAFF WITH RETAINING WALL MANUFACTURE PRIOR TO WALL INSTALLATION. PREPARATION AND CERTIFICATION TO BE PAID FOR BY THE CONTRACTOR. SECTION AND ELEVATION OF EACH WALL REQUIRED. 2. ALL SOIL PARAMETERS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY A GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT OR SITE ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IF ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM THOSE ASSUMED, NOTIFY MANUFACTURER OF C.M.U. RETAINING WALL 72 HOURS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3. RAILING IS REQUIRED ON RETAINING WALLS IN LOCATIONS WHERE DIFFERENCES IN GRADE ON EITHER SIDE OF THE WALL ARE IN EXCESS OF 2.5' AND ARE LOCATED CLOSER THAN 4' TO A WALK, PATH, PARKING AREA, OR DRIVE ACCESS ON THE HIGH SIDE-SEE PLANS. 4. COORDINATE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF RAILING POSTS AND FOOTINGS DURING THE INSTALLATION OF WALL MATERIALS. 5. COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF RAIL POSTS AND FOOTINGS WITH INSTALLATION AND LOCATION OF GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CONTRACTOR ALTER THE INTEGRITY OF THE GEOGRID OR WALL MATERIALS. 6. AIR DRIVE RAILING FOOTINGS AS SPECIFIED AND IN A MANNER TO NOT DISTURB THE WALL GEOGRID AS RECOMMENDED BY THE WALL MANUFACTURER. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF RAILING FOOTING WITH WALL MANUFACTURER TO OBSERVE INSTALLATION OF RAILING FOOTINGS. 7. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SAMPLE & CORNER MOCKUP FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8. SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL MUST BE 4' OR LESS, IF OVER 4' IT MUST BE SUBMITTED BY CONTRACTOR WITH ENGINEER SHOP DRAWINGS. 5" CONCRETE PAVEMENT CLASS 5 AGG. SUBBASE GEOGRID PER MANUFACTURER SPECS & MEASUREMENTS LEVELING PAD PER MANUF. DRAINTILE DRAINAGE AGGREGATE RECON BLOCK - INSTALL PER MANUF. NOTCH @ TRENCH DRAIN 8" DIA. CONCRETE FOOTING AT CORNER AND END POSTS PLANTING SOIL 2" NOM. METAL POST PER FENCING SYSTEM MANUF., TYP. Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C5.7 CIVIL DETAILS . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1 48 " 6" M I N . 18 " M I N . KEY 1. TOPSOIL 2. FREE DRAINING ANGULAR WASHED STONE 3/4" - 2" PARTICLE SIZE (NON LIMESTONE MATERIAL THAT CONTAINS LESS THAN 5% DELETERIOUS MATERIAL). INSTALL TO MIN. 95% STANDARD DENSITY PER AASHTO T99. TYP. SECTION DETAIL NTS 1.INSTALL SILT FENCE AND/OR OR OTHER APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING OR ENTERING THE PRACTICE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2.ALL DOWN-GRADIENT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY BEGINS. 3.PERFORM CONTINUOUS INSPECTIONS OF EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES. 4.INSTALL UTILITIES (WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, PHONE, FIBER OPTIC, ETC) PRIOR TO SETTING FINAL GRADE OF BIORETENTION DEVICE. 5.PERFORM ALL OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 6.SEED AND MULCH ALL AREAS AFTER DISTURBANCE. 7.CONSTRUCT RETENTION DEVICE UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA. 8.IMPLEMENT TEMPORARY AND PERMENATE EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES. 9.PLANT AND MULCH SITE. 10.REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS ADEQUATELY VEGETATED. GENERAL NOTES 1.IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PRACTICE PRIOR TO CONTINUING CONSTRUCTION. 2.GRADING OF RETENTION DEVICES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW-COMPACTION EARTH-MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF UNDERLYING SOILS. 3.ALL SUB MATERIALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED RETENTION DEPTH (ELEVATION) SHALL BE UNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING 12" (TYP)30"12" (TYP) GRADE PAVEMENT/LANDSCAPING/SOD 120" DIA. PERF. CMP PIPE. FABRIC WRAP TOP, SIDES AND BOTTOM WITH CONTECH C-40 NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE SUBDRAIN FILTER MATERIAL - FINE FILTER AGGREGATE PER MNDOT 3149.2J 6" PERF. CPP DRAIN TILE PIPE PER MNDOT 3245 . LOCATION AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS PROVIDE 3" OF ROCK AROUND DRAIN TILE TO PREVENT CLOGGING AND SAND WASHOUT UNDERGROUND FILTRATION SYSTEM N T S3 ELEVATION VIEW BAFFLE WALL AND DRAW DOWN RISER DETAIL NOT TO SCALE END VIEW BAFFLE WALL ELEV. = 984.50 BAFFLE WALL ELEV.=984.50 SYSTEM INV.=983.00 WRAP PIPE IN MNDOT TYPE 1 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TOP OF PIPE ELEV.=987.00 6" PERFORATED DRAW DOWN PIPE SYSTEM INV.=983.00 OUTLET STRUCTURE - OSC 1 N T S WEIR WALL ELEV=1001.40 18" RCP OUTLETELEV=987.50 6" DRAIN TILE INLETDRAIN TILEELEV.=987.50 15" RCP INLETELEV=994.50 12" ORIFICE ELEV=1001.40 12" ORIFICEELEV=994.60 ELEV=998.70 (TOP WEIR WALL) 15" INLET PIPE 18" OUTLET PIPE 12" ORIFICEELEV=995.40 6" DRAIN TILE INLET ELEV=987.50 1 JELLYFISH SYSTEM N T S2 Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C5.8 CIVIL DETAILS . . . . . . . . . . . . A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF EOF 18" DECORATIVE ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP. 18" DECORATIVE ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP. 4. 4 5 % 0. 4 0 % 1. 6 5 % 4. 6 5 % 3. 8 8 % 3. 6 3 % 2. 0 0 % 6.70% 7.00% 7.00 % 2. 5 7 % 0.50% 4 . 0 5 % 4 . 0 6 % 6. 6 0 % 7. 4 0 % 2 . 3 0 % 1.47% 0.73% 0.52% 7. 6 0 % 6 . 7 % 4 . 1 4 % 1. 7 6 % 4. 9 3 % 7.46% 3.25% 6.92% 3.03% 6.35% 2.58% 3.46% 2.03% 2.08% 1.89% 6.48% 1.75% 7.08% 3.13% 7.59% 3.15% 2.09% 6.89% 2.82% 7.52% 3.36% 7.94% 3.90% 7.52% 1.16%1.14% 0. 7 1 % 1. 6 0 % 2 . 7 2 % 2 . 8 5 % 2.4 7 % 2.5 1 % 4 3 . 2 2 % 5. 3 1 % 6. 5 7 % 13. 5 7 % 30.00 % 1 5 . 2 8 % 4 . 0 0 % 2 . 0 0 % 3.29% HAMEL ROAD S73°12'09"E 290.00 S1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 8 " W 3 1 7 . 3 4 N74°53'27"W 290.00 N1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 6 " E 3 2 5 . 8 9 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 25821 Robert L. Binder 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 Know what's below.before you dig.Call R LEGEND PROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES EDGING - HVY. DUTY, COMMERCIAL GRADE, BLACK VINYL, INCLUDE ALL CONNECTORS, STAKES & APPURTENANCES PER MANUF. INSTALL PER MANUF. DECORATIVE BOULDERS (ROUNDED & BLOCK STYLE), 18"-30" DIA. LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1.WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH (MINIMUM AFTER INSTALLATION AND/OR TOP DRESSING OPERATIONS) OF DECORATIVE ROCK MULCH - 3" DK. GREY CRUSHED TRAP ROCK, SAMPLES REQ. 2.ALL TREES NOT IN SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK. 3.IF SHOWN ON PLAN, RANDOM SIZED LIMESTONE BOULDERS COLOR AND SIZE TO COMPLIMENT NEW LANDSCAPING. OWNER TO APPROVE BOULDER SAMPLES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 4.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD. 5.UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 6.CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE. 7.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 6" LAYER TOPSOIL AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 8.COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 9.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE. 10.REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. 11.SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. 12.PROVIDE SITE WIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY PROGRAMMABLE AND CAPABLE OF ALTERNATE DATE WATERING. THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE HEAD TO HEAD OR DRIP COVERAGE AND BE CAPABLE OF DELIVERING ONE INCH OF PRECIPITATION PER WEEK. SYSTEM SHALL EXTEND INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT/BACK OF CURB. 13.CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE APPROVAL OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM INCLUDING PRICING FROM OWNER, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N SEE SHEET L1.1 FOR PLANT SCHEDULE AND GROUND COVER LEGEND TREES CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY AS2 6 Sienna Glen Maple / Acer x freemanii `Sienna` TM 3.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR Y RB 6 River Birch / Betula nigra 3.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE Y BS 3 Shiloh Splash Birch / Betula nigra `Shiloh Splash`3.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR Y CP 3 Prairie Sentinel Hackberry / Celtis occidentalis `JFS-KSU1` TM 3.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR Y GD 6 Street Keeper Honey Locust / Gleditsia triacanthos `Draves` TM 3.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR Y EK 4 Espresso Kentucky Coffeetree / Gymnocladus dioica `Espresso`3.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR Y QS 5 Crimson Spire Oak / Quercus robur x alba `Crimschmidt` TM 3.5" Cal. B&B NOT NATIVE Y EVERGREEN TREES CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY JE 13 Eastern Red Cedar / Juniperus virginiana 10` B&B NATIVE PD 4 Black Hills Spruce / Picea glauca `Densata`10` B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR PT 9 Mugo Pine / Pinus mugo `Tannenbaum`10` B&B NOT NATIVE ORNAMENTAL TREES CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY CV 6 Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn / Crataegus crus-galli inermis TM 1.5" Cal. B&B NOT NATIVE Y MS 8 Spring Snow Crabapple / Malus x `Spring Snow`1.5" Cal. B&B NOT NATIVE Y MB 14 Red Barron Crabapple / Malus x 'Red Barron'1.5" CAL. B&B NOT NATIVE Y SHRUBS CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY DL 9 Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle / Diervilla lonicera #5 CONT NATIVE Y HA 13 Annabelle Hydrangea / Hydrangea arborescens `Annabelle`#5 CONT NATIVE CULTIVAR Y SGJ 35 Sea Green Juniper / Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green`5 gal.NOT NATIVE N JM2 4 Medora Juniper / Juniperus scopulorum `Medora`#5 CONT NOT NATIVE N MD 25 Russian Cypress / Microbiota decussata #5 CONT NOT NATIVE N PD2 0 Little Devil Dwarf Ninebark / Physocarpus opulifolius 'Donna May' TM #5 CONT RE 2 Como Park Easy Elegance Rose / Rosa x `BAlark` TM #5 CONT NOT NATIVE Y TT 16 Taunton`s Yew / Taxus x media `Tauntonii`#5 CONT NOT NATIVE N GRASSES CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY CK 121 Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass / Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster'#1 CONT SB 94 Blue Heaven Little Bluestem / Schizachyrium scoparium `Blue Heaven`#1 CONT Pot PERENNIALS CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY HA2 76 Daylily / Hemerocallis x `Chicago Apache`#1 CONT HS 23 Stella Supreme Daylily / Hemerocallis x 'Stella Supreme'#1 CONT NL2 36 Catmint / Nepeta racemosa `Little Titch`#1 CONT PLANT SCHEDULE GROUND COVERS COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE Dog Park Mulch / Dog Park Mulch Organic mulch specifically preoduced for use in dog parks. Shall knit together to form matted, accessible surface, shall be treated with anti-microbial agent. Mulch Shooting Star No Mow Fine Fescue Mix / No MowSeed Mix Seed Mix Rock Maintanence Strip / Rock Maintanence Strip 1" River rock over filter fabric, include edging as shown & needed. See detail. Mulch Blue Grass Based / Sod Commercial grade, locally grown, "Big Roll" preferred Sod GROUND COVER LEGEND REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION L1.1 LANDSCAPE NOTES, DETAILS & SCHEDULE . . . . . . . . . . . . Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 25821 Robert L. Binder 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 Know what's below.before you dig.Call R 1.ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2.SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IRRIGATION WATER, METER, AND POWER CONNECTIONS. 3.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/INSTALLATION. ANY DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CORRECTING DAMAGES SHALL BE BORNE ENTIRELY BY THE CONTRACTOR. 4.SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY STANDARDS AND SHALL BE PER NATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES. EXACT LOCATION OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUIVALENT AT THE JOB SITE. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY FOR THE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND METERING FACILITIES. 6.IRRIGATION WATER LINE CONNECTION SIZE IS 1-12" AT BUILDING. VERIFY WITH MECHANICAL PLANS.COVAGE. 7.ALL MAIN LINES SHALL BE 18" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 8.ALL LATERAL LINES SHALL BE 12" BELLOW FINISHED GRADE. 9.ALL EXPOSED PVC RISERS, IF ANY, SHALL BE GRAY IN COLOR. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL LAY ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT AT 2'-0" BELOW THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE TOP OF PAVEMENT. EXTEND SLEEVES TO 2'-0" BEYOND PAVEMENT. 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK THE LOCATION OF ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT WITH THE SLEEVING MATERIAL "ELLED" TO 2'-0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AND CAPPED. 12.FABRICATE ALL PIPE TO MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH CLEAN AND SQUARE CUT JOINTS. USE QUALITY GRADE PRIMER AND SOLVENT CEMENT FORMULATED FOR INTENDED TYPE OF CONNECTION. 13.BACKFILL ALL TRENCHES WITH SOIL FREE OF SHARP OBJECTS AND DEBRIS. 14.ALL VALVE BOXES AND COVERS SHALL BE BLACK IN COLOR. 15.GROUP VALVE BOXES TOGETHER FOR EASE WHEN SERVICE IS REQUIRED. LOCATE IN PLANT BED AREAS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 16.IRRIGATION CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED ON-SITE WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 17.CONTROL WIRES: 14 GAUGE DIRECT BURIAL, SOLID COPPER IRRIGATION WIRE. RUN UNDER MAIN LINE. USE MOISTURE-PROOF SPLICES AND SPLICE ONLY AT VALVES OR PULL BOXES. RUN SEPARATE HOT AND COMMON WIRE TO EACH VALVE AND ONE (1) SPARE WIRE AND GROUND TO FURTHEST VALVE FROM CONTROLLER. LABEL OR COLOR CODE ALL WIRES. 18.AVOID OVER SPRAY ON BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, WALLS AND ROADWAYS BY INDIVIDUALLY ADJUSTING RADIUS OR ARC ON SPRINKLER HEADS AND FLOW CONTROL ON AUTOMATIC VALVE. 19.ADJUST PRESSURE REGULATING VALVES FOR OPTIMUM PRESSURE ON SITE. 20.USE SCREENS ON ALL HEADS. 21.A SET OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON-SITE AT ALL TIMES IN AN UPDATED CONDITION. 22.ALL PIPE 3" AND OVER SHALL HAVE THRUST BLOCKING AT EACH TURN. 23.ALL AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVES WILL HAVE 3" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL UNDERNEATH VALVE AND VALVE BOX. GRAVEL SHALL EXTENT 3" BEYOND PERIMETER OF VALVE BOX. 24.THERE SHALL BE 3" MINIMUM SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX COVER AND TOP OF VALVE STRUCTURE. IRRIGATION NOTES: FACE OF BUILDING, WALL, OR STRUCTURE MIN. 3" LAYER OF ROCK MULCH AS SPECIFIED. PROVIDE SAMPLE TOLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FINISHED GRADE COMPACTED SUBGRADE WATER PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AS SPECIFIED 24" - VERIFY W/ PLAN AGGREGATE MAINTANENCE STRIP - 24" N T S STAKED LANDSCAPE EDGER AS SPECIFIED, SEE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND SPECS. FOR INSTALLATION AND PLACEMENT SLOPE - MIN. 2%, MAX. 5:1VERIFY W/ GRADING PLAN 1 PERENNIAL BED PLANTING N T S PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE ROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TO ENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACT SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED EXISTING GRADE ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT STEM BACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATION DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL. SIZE VARIES SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT 4 DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS SHRUB PLANTING N T S PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL SHAPE FOR SPECIES) PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE ROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TO ENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACT SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED EXISTING GRADE ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT TRUNK BACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATION DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL. THREE TIMES WIDTH OF ROOTBALL RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT 3 THREE TIMES WIDTH OF ROOTBALLDECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING N T S PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE 2"X4"X8' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120° TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH NYLON STRAPPING WITH GROMMETS. ALTERNATE STABILIZING METHODS MAY BE PROPOSED BY CONTRACTOR. TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1"-2" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROMPLANT TRUNK EXISTING GRADE CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. IF NON-BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED COMPACT BOTTOM OF PIT, TYP. RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT 2 LEGEND SEE SHEET L1.0 FOR LANDSCAPE LEGEND ALL PLANTING BEDS & BUILDING MAINTENANCE STRIPS - 3" DK. GREY CRUSHED TRAP ROCK. INCLUDE PERMEABLE GEO-TEXTILE (PER DETAIL) IN MAINTENANCE STRIP AREAS ONLY. SAMPLES REQ. BEFORE INSTALLATION. PROVIDE EDGING AS SHOWN ON PLAN REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT:480 CAL. IN. PROVIDED TREE REPLACEMENT: CANOPY:166 CAL. IN. EVERGREEN:117 CAL. IN. ORNAMENTAL: 42 CAL. IN. TOTAL PROVIDED:325 CAL. IN. TREE REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS: CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF EOF CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION AT ALL DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS. PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. INLET PROTECTION AT CATCH BASINS, TYP PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. (P.O.B.) A Point 552.5 feet NW'ly of the SW Corner of Lot 16 ("Point A") Li n e P a r a l l e l w i t h NW ' l y L i n e o f L o t 1 6 S'ly Right-of-Way Line of Soo Line Railroad Point of Beginning Li n e P a r a l l e l w i t h NW ' l y L i n e o f L o t 1 6 pe r f o u n d m o n u m e n t a t i o n 30.8 3 . 6 15.8 1 3 . 4 6.2 2 4 . 2 22.5 3 . 8 12.5 0 . 7 17.6 1 0 . 9 0.3 2 6 . 7 4 0 . 2 28.5 4 0 . 3 28.3 Fire Pit Stone Wall Bituminou s Driveway Deck HAMEL ROAD S73°12'09"E 290.00 S1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 8 " W 3 1 7 . 3 4 N74°53'27"W 290.00 N1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 6 " E 3 2 5 . 8 9 2 Story H o u s e 342 Hame l R d Foundatio n A r e a = 1,899 S.F . Block Wall B l o c k W a l l Pavers Pavers Edge of Woods 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Block Wall Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l Garage Access PID: 12118234 2 0 0 1 5 PID: 12118234 2 0 0 1 6 Address Unassigne d [A] Sidewalk Crosses Property Line 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SW1.0 SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES. CITY OF MEDINA EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 3. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.6 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.\ 4. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. SWPPP NOTES: Know what's below.before you dig.Call R LEGEND: EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DRAINAGE ARROW 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DN DN DN DN DN A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF EOF R2 8 . 0 'R24.0' CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION AT ALL DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS. PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. INLET PROTECTION AT CATCH BASINS, TYP PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. 4. 4 5 % 0. 4 0 % 1. 6 5 % 4. 6 5 % 3. 8 8 % 3. 6 3 % 2. 0 0 % 6.70% 7.00% 7.00 % 2. 5 7 % 0.50% 4 . 0 5 % 4 . 0 6 % 6. 6 0 % 7. 4 0 % 2 . 3 0 % 1.47% 0.73% 0.52% 7. 6 0 % 6 . 7 % 4 . 1 4 % 1. 7 6 % 4. 9 3 % 7.46% 3.25% 6.92% 3.03% 6.35% 2.58% 3.46% 2.03% 2.08% 1.89% 6.48% 1.75% 7.08% 3.13% 7.59% 3.15% 2.09% 6.89% 2.82% 7.52% 3.36% 7.94% 3.90% 7.52% 1.16%1.14% 0. 7 1 % 1. 6 0 % 2 . 7 2 % 2 . 8 5 % 2.4 7 % 2.5 1 % 4 3 . 2 2 % 5. 3 1 % 6. 5 7 % 13. 5 7 % 30.00 % 1 5 . 2 8 % 4 . 0 0 % 2 . 0 0 % 3.29% (P.O.B.) A Point 552.5 feet NW'ly of the SW Corner of Lot 16 ("Point A") Li n e P a r a l l e l w i t h NW ' l y L i n e o f L o t 1 6 S'ly Right-of-Way Line of Soo Line Railroad Point of Beginning Li n e P a r a l l e l w i t h NW ' l y L i n e o f L o t 1 6 pe r f o u n d m o n u m e n t a t i o n HAMEL ROAD S73°12'09"E 290.00 S1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 8 " W 3 1 7 . 3 4 N74°53'27"W 290.00 N1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 6 " E 3 2 5 . 8 9 Pavers Pavers 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l Access PID: 12118234 2 0 0 1 5 PID: 12118234 2 0 0 1 6 Address Unassigne d [A] Sidewalk Crosses Property Line 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SW1.1 SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . Know what's below.before you dig.Call R 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES. CITY OF MEDINA EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 3. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.6 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES. 4. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. SWPPP NOTES: LEGEND: EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DRAINAGE ARROW 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SW1.2 SWPPP - DETAILS . . . . . . . . . . . . Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL . . 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 07/11/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SW1.3 SWPPP - DETAILS . . . . . . . . . . . . Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 8/5/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 08/05/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C0.0 TITLE SHEET .. .. .. .. .. .. HAMEL TOWNHOMES MEDINA, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER SITE LOCATION MAP N ISSUED FOR: FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL DEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER: HAMEL TOWNHOMES, LLC 1850 W WAYZATA BLVD LONG LAKE, MN 55356 CONTACT. OWNER: GRANT TJERNAGEL EMAIL: GRANT@PRO-COMMERCIAL.COM DIRECT: 515-597-4700 ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: CIVIL SITE GROUP 5000 GLENWOOD AVE GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 CONTACT. ENGINEER: MATT PAVEK, PE EMAIL: MPAVEK@CIVILSITEGROUP.COM OFFICE : 612-615-0060 LANDSCAPE ARCH.: ROBERT BINDER, PLA EMAIL: RBINDER@CIVILSITEGROUP.COM OFFICE : 612-615-0060 SURVEYOR: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: Know what's below. before you dig.Call R ARCHITECT: COLLINS/WEBB 307B SW MARKT ST LEE'S SUMMIT, MISSOURI 64063 CONTACT. ARCHITECT: JASON PECSI, AIA EMAIL: JPECSI@COLLINSANDWEBB.COM DIRECT: 816-249-2278 CIVIL SITE GROUP 4931 W 35TH STREET SUITE 200 ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CONTACT. SURVEYOR: RORY SYNSTELIEN, LS EMAIL: RORY@CIVILSITEGROUP.COM OFFICE: 612-615-0060 ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES 2825 CEDAR AVE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407 CONTACT. ENGINEER: PAUL GIONFRIDDO, PE EMAIL: PGIONFRIDDO@HAUGOGTS.COM OFFICE: 612-271-8185 SITE LOCATION SHEET TITLE C0.0 TITLE SHEET SITE SURVEYV1.0 UTILITY PLAN - SANITARY & WATERC4.0 SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0 GRADING PLANC3.0 C5.0 C5.1 L1.0 CIVIL DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1 SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.2 C2.0 SITE PLAN SWPPP - NARRATIVESW1.4 CIVIL DETAILS C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN C5.2 CIVIL DETAILS SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.5 SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.6 L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES & DETAILS C2.2 VEHICLE TURNING DIAGRAM UTILITY PLAN OFFSITE - SANITARY & WATERC4.1 C5.3 C5.4 CIVIL DETAILS CIVIL DETAILS C5.5 CIVIL DETAILS C5.6 C5.8 CIVIL DETAILS CIVIL DETAILS SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.3 C5.7 CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN HYDRANT SPACINGC4.2 C2.1 SITE PLAN OFFSITE UTILITY PLAN - STORMWATERC4.3 C1.1 REMOVALS PLAN CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF 1000 . 7 6 EOF 1001.00 EOF 1001.15 EOF 1010.00 REMOVE EXISTING TREE AND ROOT BALL, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING TREE AND ROOT BALL, IN R.O.W. COORDINATE WITH CITY FOR ALL WORK IN R.O.W. REMOVE EXISTING TREE AND ROOT BALL, TYP. SAWCUT & REMOVE REMOVE EXISTING PVMT. SEE SITE PLAN FOR NEW PROPOSED PVMT. EDGE/LAYOUT (FUTURE BY OTHERS) REMOVE & SALVAGE CONC. PAVERS. STOCKPILE FOR REINSTALLATION, SEE SITE PLAN FOR NEW LAYOUT PROTECT EXIST. UTILITIES TO REMAIN, TYP. REMOVE & SALVAGE CONC. PAVERS. STOCKPILE FOR REINSTALLATION, SEE SITE PLAN FOR NEW LAYOUT REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER, (FUTURE, BY OTHERS) REMOVE ALL PVMTS., INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL, TYP. REMOVE ALL WALLS, STEPS, TIMBERS & CURBS, INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL & FOOTINGS, TYP. REMOVE ALL BUILDING STRUCTURES, INCLUDING ALL FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS & ALL UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES. REMOVE ALL ADJACENT AND ATTACHED STRUCTURES (DECKS, PORCHES). REMOVE ALL PVMTS., INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL, TYP. REMOVE ALL WALLS, STEPS, TIMBERS & CURBS, INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL & FOOTINGS, TYP. REMOVE ALL PVMTS., INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL, TYP. REMOVE ALL WALLS, TIMBERS & CURBS, INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL & FOOTINGS, TYP. REMOVE ALL PVMTS., INCLUDING ALL BASE MATERIAL, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING TREES, SHRUBS, UNDERBRUSH & DEBRIS, INCLUDING ALL AND ROOT BALLS & UNDERGROUND PLANT STRUCTURE, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING WATER AND SEWER SERVICES TO PROPERTY LINE CAP AND ABANDON SERVICES PAST PROPERTY LINE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. SERVICE LOCATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER PROTECT PROPERTY CORNER EXISTING GAS LINE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED BY OTHERS REMOVE EXISTING GAS LINE TO PROPERTY LINE AND ABANDON SERVICES PAST PROPERTY LINE PER CITY STANDARDS. SERVICE LOCATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED REMOVE EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO PROPOSED BEND. SERVICE LOCATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED ABANDON EXISTING WATER AND SANITARY PER CITY REQUIREMENTS (P.O.B.) A Point 552.5 feet NW'ly of the SW Corner of Lot 16 ("Point A") Li n e P a r a l l e l w i t h NW ' l y L i n e o f L o t 1 6 S'ly Right-of-Way Line of Soo Line Railroad Point of Beginning Li n e P a r a l l e l w i t h NW ' l y L i n e o f L o t 1 6 pe r f o u n d m o n u m e n t a t i o n 30.8 3 . 6 15.8 1 3 . 4 6.2 2 4 . 2 22.5 3 . 8 12.5 0 . 7 17.6 1 0 . 9 0.3 2 6 . 7 4 0 . 2 28.5 4 0 . 3 28.3 Fire Pit Stone Wall Bitumin o u s Drivewa y Deck HAMEL ROAD S73°12'09"E 290.00 S1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 8 " W 3 1 7 . 3 4 N74°53'27"W 290.00 N1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 6 " E 3 2 5 . 8 9 2 Story H o u s e 342 Ha m e l R d Founda t i o n A r e a = 1,899 S . F . Block Wall B l o c k W a l l Pavers Pavers Edge of Woods (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Block Wall Garage Access PID: 121182 3 4 2 0 0 1 5 PID: 121182 3 4 2 0 0 1 6 Address Unassig n e d [A] Sidewalk Crosses Property Line 16" WM 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E REMOVALS LEGEND: TREE PROTECTION REMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL, INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS. REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALL FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS. TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 8/5/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 08/05/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN .. .. .. .. .. .. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF IN RIGHT-OF-WAY, COORDINATE WITH LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT. REMOVAL NOTES: 1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 3.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 4.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 5.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS. 6.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 7.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS. 8.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. 9.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 10.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. 11.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 12.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 13.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 14.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 15.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 16.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 17.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 18.ALL EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC/REGULATORY SIGNAGE TO BE INVENTORIED AND IF REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETURNED TO LGU. 19.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CITY OF MEDINA REMOVAL NOTES: 1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.6 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: DL TREE PROTECTION N T S 25' DRIPLINE WIDTH FURNISH A AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIP LINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SHOWN ON PLAN, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. WHERE POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25' BEYOND DRIP LINE. PLACE TREE PROTECTION SIGN ON POSTS, ONE PER INDIVIDUAL TREE (FACING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY), OR ONE EVERY 100' LF ALONG A GROVE OR MULTI-TREE PROTECTION AREA. POSTS AND FENCING EXTEND FENCE 25' BEYOND DRIPLINE WHERE POSSIBLE TREE PROTECTION SIGN, TYP. TREE DRIPLINE, OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 1 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DN DN DN DN DN A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 19.0'24.0' 24.0'19.1'49.2' 49.1' 14 . 0 ' 1.0' 39.0'12.0' 24.0' 39.0' 1.0' 24.5' 20 8 . 1 ' 18 3 . 0 ' 104.0' 30 . 2 ' 2. 0 ' 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K 6.2' 9.7' 14:45 Request c o n t r o l 30 . 2 ' 39.0' 19.3'18.6' 9. 5 ' GANG MAILBOX 12'X12' GAZEBO STRUCTURE, INSTALL PER MANUF. 6' HEIGHT WOOD PRIVACY FENCING 25 . 4 ' 14.6' 20 . 5 ' 13.7' 9.2'5. 7 ' 4. 8 ' 24.5' 13.7' CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON PER CITY STANDARDS, TYP. BIT. PVMT., TYP PROPOSED 4 UNIT BUILDING BIT. PVMT., TYP PROPOSED 4 UNIT BUILDING PR O P O S E D 8 U N I T B U I L D I N G PR O P O S E D 8 U N I T B U I L D I N G PR O P O S E D 6 U N I T B U I L D I N G 8 CONCRETE SIDEWALK PVMT.STRIPING, TYP. BIT. PVMT., TYP MATCH EXIST. CURB PER CITY STANDARD MATCH EXIST. CURB PER CITY STANDARD ZONING: (CH-RR) COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY RAILROAD ZONING: (UR) URBAN RESIDENTIAL B612 C&G SURMOUNTABLE TIP IN C&G SNOW STORAGE CONCRETE PATH PROPOSED PAVERS SIDEWALK CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT R 1 6 . 0 ' R2 0 . 0 ' 10.0' 6.0' 11.6'24.0'12.3'C.I.P. CONC STEPS & PAVER WALK, SEE GRADING PLAN, TYP. THICKENED EDGE PATIO 24 . 0 ' SEG. RET. WALL STEPS, PER MANUF. DESIGN & LAYOUT SEG. RET. WALL. STEP T.O.W. DOWN WITH STEP LAYOUT, MIN 12" ABOVE ADJ. ADJACENT STEP SEG. RET. WALL. MAINTAIN CONSTANT T.O.W. ELEV. ON THIS SIDE OF STEPS 13.7' 0. 7 ' 5. 0 ' 19 . 0 ' 19 . 0 ' 2. 0 ' 2. 0 ' 3.0' 3.0' 3.4' 1. 0 ' 5. 0 ' THICKENED EDGE PATIO THICKENED EDGE PATIO THICKENED EDGE PATIO THICKENED EDGE PATIO THICKENED EDGE PATIO PROPOSED PAVERS SIDEWALK PROPOSED CURB (FUTURE, BY OTHERS)PROPOSED CURB (FUTURE, BY OTHERS) PROPOSED PAVING AREA (FUTURE, BY OTHERS) PROPOSED PAVING AREA (FUTURE, BY OTHERS) 54 . 5 ' 49 . 1 ' 48 . 2 ' 54 . 0 ' 5' ROD IRON FENCE PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK 11 . 5 ' BIT. PVMT., TYP SURMOUNTABLE C&G 9. 2 ' 15 6 . 1 ' R 2 8 . 0 ' R24.0 ' 39.0'12.0' 38 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 14 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 14 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 14 . 0 ' R3.0 ' 38 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 14 . 0 ' 14 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 8.7' 8.6' 19.4' 49.4' 104.0' 14 . 0 ' 14 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' SNOW STORAGE 18.9' 21 . 3 ' 18.9' 21 . 3 ' 18 . 9 ' 21.3' 18 . 9 ' 21.3' 18 . 9 ' 21.3' 9.0' DOG WASTE STATION SEE DETAIL SURMOUNTABLE TIP IN C&G VALLEY GUTTER VALLEY GUTTER SURMOUNTABLE TIP IN C&G SURMOUNTABLE C&G PEDESTRIAN RAMPS NO PARKING FIRE LANE NO PARKING FIRE LANE NO PARKING FIRE LANE NO PARKING FIRE LANE 5' ROD IRON FENCE 5' ROD IRON FENCE SURMOUNTABLE TIP OUT C&G TRANSITION FROM TIP OUT TO TIP IN C&G SURMOUNTABLE TIP IN C&G TRANSITION FROM TIP OUT TO TIP IN C&G CONC.CURB STOPS, TYP. PROTECT EXISTING PROPERTY CORNER R5.0 ' R6.0' 4" BOLLARDS TO BE INSTALLED AROUND HYDRANT, TYP. 4" BOLLARDS TO BE INSTALLED AROUND HYDRANT, TYP. PROPOSED PAVING AREA. PER CITY STANDARDS MATCH EXISTING RESTORE 8.5FT BITUMINOUS TRAIL EOF 1000 . 7 6 EOF 1001.00 EOF 1001.15 EOF 1010.00 NO PARKING FIRE LANE NO PARKING FIRE LANE NO PARKING FIRE LANE NO PARKING FIRE LANE PRIVATE D&U EASEMENT PUBLIC D&U EASEMENT HAMEL ROAD Pavers Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 12" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bit u m i n o u s T r a i l (A Public R/W) 16" WM 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 8/5/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 08/05/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C2.0 SITE PLAN .. .. .. .. .. .. SITE AREA TABLE: 1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS. 6.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 7.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. 9.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL. 10.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. 11.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL. 12.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 14.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS. 15.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 16.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP. 17.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 18.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS. 19.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SITE LAYOUT NOTES: SITE PLAN LEGEND: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED. HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGN NP = NO PARKING FIRE LANE ST = STOP CP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY Know what's below. before you dig.Call R CONCRETE PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEE DETAIL. PROPERTY LINE CURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUT GUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLAN LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE). SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL. HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE). SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TO PERVIOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) - CONCRETE PAVER PERVIOUS SYSTEM. INCLUDE ALL BASE MATERIAL AND APPURTENANCES AS SPECIFIED PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS. MAKE: BELGARD, OR EQUIVILANT MODEL: AQUASTONE, OR EQUIVILANT COLOR: T.B.D. - PROVIDE SAMPLES, SHOP DRAWINGS & PRODUCT DATA REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SPECIALTY PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) - PROVIDE BID FOR THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS, INCLUDE VARIATIONS OF BASE MATERIAL AND OTHER NECESSARY COMPONENTS. 1. STAMPED & COLORED CONCRETE 2. CONCRETE PAVERS MAKERS, COLORS, MODELS, & PATTERN TO BE INCLUDED IN SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. OPERATIONAL NOTES: SNOW REMOVAL: ALL SNOW SHALL EB STORED ON-SITE OUTSIDE PARKING LOT. WHEN FULL, REMOVAL COMPANY SHALL REMOVE EXCESS OFF-SITE. TRASH: TRASH RECEPTACLES IN GARAGE CITY OF MEDINA SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES. ACCESSIBILITY ARROW (IF APPLICABLE) DO NOT PAINT. 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N ZONING NOTES: 1.CURRENT ZONING: UPTOWN HAMEL (UH) 2.PROPOSED ZONING: UPTOWN HAMEL (UH) 3.THE GROSS LAND AREA IS 93,259 +/- SQUARE FEET OR 2.14 +/- ACRES. 4.DENSITY: AT LEAST 10 RESIDENTIAL UNITS PER NET ACRE. PROPOSED UNITS = 30 5.SETBACKS: FRONT YARD: 0 FT SIDE YARD: 8 FT REAR YARD: 20 FT RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DN DN DN DN DN A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT R 2 8 . 0 ' R24.0 ' R5.0' R6.0' EOF 1000 . 7 6 EOF 1001.00 EOF 1001.15 EOF 1010.00 HAMEL ROAD Pavers Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 18" RCP 12" RCP 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l Railroad Tracks (A Public R/W) Access [A] Sidewalk Crosses Property Line 16" WM 12" WM 16" WM 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DN DN DN DN DN A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT R 2 8 . 0 ' R24.0 ' R5.0' R6.0' EOF 1000 . 7 6 EOF 1001.00 EOF 1001.15 EOF 1010.00 HAMEL ROAD Pavers Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 18" RCP 12" RCP 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l Railroad Tracks (A Public R/W) Access [A] Sidewalk Crosses Property Line 16" WM 12" WM 16" WM 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DN DN DN DN DN A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT R 2 8 . 0 ' R24.0 ' R5.0' R6.0' EOF 1000 . 7 6 EOF 1001.00 EOF 1001.15 EOF 1010.00 HAMEL ROAD Pavers Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 18" RCP 12" RCP 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l Railroad Tracks (A Public R/W) Access [A] Sidewalk Crosses Property Line 16" WM 12" WM 16" WM 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DN DN DN DN DN A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT R 2 8 . 0 ' R24.0 ' R5.0' R6.0' EOF 1000 . 7 6 EOF 1001.00 EOF 1001.15 EOF 1010.00 HAMEL ROAD Pavers Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 18" RCP 12" RCP 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l Railroad Tracks (A Public R/W) Access [A] Sidewalk Crosses Property Line 16" WM 12" WM 16" WM 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DN DN DN DN DN A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT R 2 8 . 0 ' R24.0 ' R5.0' R6.0' EOF 1000 . 7 6 EOF 1001.00 EOF 1001.15 EOF 1010.00 HAMEL ROAD Pavers Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 18" RCP 12" RCP 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bitu m i n o u s T r a i l Railroad Tracks (A Public R/W) Access [A] Sidewalk Crosses Property Line 16" WM 12" WM 16" WM 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DN DN DN DN DN A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT R 2 8 . 0 ' R24.0 ' R5.0' R6.0' EOF 1000 . 7 6 EOF 1001.00 EOF 1001.15 EOF 1010.00 HAMEL ROAD Pavers Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 18" RCP 12" RCP 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bit u m i n o u s T r a i l Railroad Tracks (A Public R/W) Access [A] Sidewalk Crosses Property Line 16" WM 12" WM 16" WM 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 8/5/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 08/05/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C2.2 VEHICLE TURNING DIAGRAM .. .. .. .. .. .. 0 1" = 50'-0" 50'-0"25'-0" N MOVING TRUCK FIRE TRUCK GARBAGE TRUCK MOVING TRUCK FIRE TRUCK GARBAGE TRUCK RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DN DN DN DN DN A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT R 2 8 . 0 ' R24.0 ' R5.0 ' R6.0' EOF 1000 . 7 6 EOF 1001.00 EOF 1001.15 EOF 1010.00 HAMEL ROAD S73°12'09"E 290.00 S1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 8 " W 3 1 7 . 3 4 N74°53'27"W 290.00 N1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 6 " E 3 2 5 . 8 9 Pavers Pavers 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bit u m i n o u s T r a i l Access [A] Sidewalk Crosses Property Line 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E FES 1 STMH 2 CBMH 4 CBMH 5A CBMH 5 CBMH 5B OCS 5 CB 6A MH 36 CBMH 35 MH 34 MH 33 MH 32 MH 31 MH 30 MH 29 MH 28 CBMH 27 MH 26MH 24MH 23MH 22MH 21MH 20 FUTURE CBMH 11 MH 25 SANMH 4B SANMH 3B SANMH 4 SANMH 3 SANMH 3A SANMH 5 SANMH 7 Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 8/5/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 08/05/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C3.0 GRADING PLAN .. .. .. .. .. .. 1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 4.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 5.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 6.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:1 9.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES. 11.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE. 12.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. 13.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK. 14.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10' OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS. 15. TOLERANCES 15.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 15.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 15.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. 15.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. 16.MAINTENANCE 16.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS. 16.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED. 16.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION. GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL GRADING PLAN LEGEND: SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTER SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRS GROUNDWATER INFORMATION: CITY OF MEDINA GRADING NOTES: 1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES. SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.6 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: Know what's below. before you dig.Call R EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT) EMERGENCY OVERFLOW EOF=1135.52 TO PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY XXXXX, INC., DATED XX-XX-XX GROUNDWATER WAS OBSERVED AT ELEVATIONS RANGING FROM XXX.XX TO XXX.XX THE BORINGS & GROUNDWATER ARE AS FOLLOWS: SB-1 XXX.XX SB-2 XXX.XX SB-3 XXX.XX SB-4 XXX.XX PROPOSED FOOTING DRAIN TILE INVERT ELEVATION = XXX.XX SPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTING GRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N LOW FLOOR ELEVATION GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF BLOCK (FOUNDATION) ELEVATION RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DN DN DN DN DN A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT R 2 8 . 0 ' R24.0 ' R5.0 ' R6.0' EOF 1000 . 7 6 EOF 1001.00 EOF 1001.15 EOF 1010.00 HAMEL ROAD Pavers Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bit u m i n o u s T r a i l 16" WM 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E PROPOSED GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX 8" PVC C900 WATER 8" PVC C900 WATER STUB TO WITHIN 10' FROM BUILDING, COORD. W/MECH'L TYP. CONNECT TO EXISTING 6" PVC WATERMAIN STUB. COORD. WITH CITY WHERE WATER CROSSES STORM OR SANITARY, MAINTAIN 18" SEPARATION AND INCLUDE 4" RIGID INSULATION, TYP. 1.5" COPPER WATER SERVICE W/CURB STOP AND BOX, TYP. HYDRANT & G.V., TYP. PROPOSED GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX 8" PVC C900 WATER 3. 0 0 ' TY P . 3.00' TYP. 3. 0 0 ' TY P . 3. 0 0 ' TY P . 10' TYP. 10.00' TYP. PROP. WATER CROSSES EXIS.STORM, MAINTAIN 18" SEPARATION AND INCLUDE 4" RIGID INSULATION, TYP. HYDRANT & G.V., TYP. HYDRANT & G.V., TYP. STUB TO WITHIN 10' FROM BUILDING, COORD. W/MECH'L 1.5" COPPER WATER SERVICE W/CURB STOP AND BOX, TYP. STUB TO WITHIN 10' FROM BUILDING, COORD. W/MECH'L TYP. SANMH 4B RE= 1001.02± INV=990.70 SANMH 4 RE= 1005.24 IE(N/E)=989.84 IE(W=989.74 SANMH 3 RE= 1006.30 IE(W)= 992.22 IE(N)=992.32 IE(E)=994.22 SANMH 3B RE= 1001.50 IE(NE)=993.30 IE(S)= 993.20 STUB 4" SANITARY SERVICE TO 5' FROM BUILDING COORD. W/MECH'L TYP. 216 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% 103 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 2.18% 219 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% SANMH 3A RE= 1006.63 IE= 994.47 SANMH 5 RE= 1003.50 IE(E)= 989.39 IE(S)=989.29 SANMH 7 RE= 1005.20 IE(N)= 989.05 IE(W)=988.95 87 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% 61 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% 196 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 2.10% 62 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% SANITARY STUB IE=994.42 30 LF 8" PVC SDR26 SANITARY @0.40% 8"X8"X6" TEE 22.5° AND 11.25° BEND 45° AND 11.25° BEND 45° AND 11.25° BEND22.5° AND 11.25° BEND 8"X8"X8" TEE 8"X8"X8" TEE 45° AND 22.5° BEND 45° BEND CROSSING INFO IE SANITARY=988.17 TOP STORM=987.72 8" TO 6" REDUCER 8" TO 6" REDUCER SAN. WYE STA=2+08.9 SAN. WYE IE=990.68 SAN. STUB IE=991.52 CURB STOP ELEV.=1001.65 SAN. WYE STA=1+93.3 SAN. WYE IE=990.61 SAN. STUB IE=991.45 CURB STOP ELEV.=1001.72 SAN. WYE STA=1+64.5 SAN. WYE IE=990.50 SAN. STUB IE=991.34 CURB STOP ELEV.=1002.63 SAN. WYE STA=1+41.4 SAN. WYE IE=990.41 SAN. STUB IE=991.25 CURB STOP ELEV.=1002.71 SAN. WYE STA=1+12.6 SAN. WYE IE=990.29 SAN. STUB IE=991.13 CURB STOP ELEV.=1003.60 SAN. WYE STA=0+92.2 SAN. WYE IE=990.21 SAN. STUB IE=991.05 CURB STOP ELEV.=1003.60 SAN. WYE STA=0+57.6 SAN. WYE IE=990.07 SAN. STUB IE=990.91 CURB STOP ELEV.=1004.38 SAN. WYE STA=0+37.2 SAN. WYE IE=989.99 SAN. STUB IE=990.83 CURB STOP ELEV.=1004.57 SAN. WYE STA=2+12.9 SAN. WYE IE=993.17 SAN. STUB IE=994.05 CURB STOP ELEV.=1002.47 SAN. WYE STA=1+64.4 SAN. WYE IE=992.98 SAN. STUB IE=993.84 CURB STOP ELEV.=1003.51 SAN. WYE STA=1+41.3 SAN. WYE IE=992.89 SAN. STUB IE=993.75 CURB STOP ELEV.=1003.62 SAN. WYE STA=1+08.7 SAN. WYE IE=992.76 SAN. STUB IE=993.61 CURB STOP ELEV.=1004.51 SAN. WYE STA=0+90.7 SAN. WYE IE=992.68 SAN. STUB IE=993.52 CURB STOP ELEV.=1004.60 SAN. WYE STA=0+58.2 SAN. WYE IE=992.55 SAN. STUB IE=993.38 CURB STOP ELEV.=1005.52 SAN. WYE STA=0+40.4 SAN. WYE IE=992.48 SAN. STUB IE=993.31 CURB STOP ELEV.=1005.64 SAN. WYE STA=1+75.2 SAN. WYE IE=993.02 SAN. STUB IE=994.00 CURB STOP ELEV.=1002.77 SAN. WYE STA=1+54.4 SAN. WYE IE=992.94 SAN. STUB IE=993.93 CURB STOP ELEV.=1002.77 SAN. WYE STA=1+21.6 SAN. WYE IE=992.81 SAN. STUB IE=993.81 CURB STOP ELEV.=1003.78 SAN. WYE STA=1+01.1 SAN. WYE IE=992.72 SAN. STUB IE=993.72 CURB STOP ELEV.=1003.84 SAN. WYE STA=0+68.8 SAN. WYE IE=992.60 SAN. STUB IE=993.61 CURB STOP ELEV.=1004.80 SAN. WYE STA=0+47.9 SAN. WYE IE=992.52 SAN. STUB IE=993.54 CURB STOP ELEV.=1004.92 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 3 4 . 9 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 8 9 . 5 6 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 0 . 1 6 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 5 . 8 5 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 5 3 . 3 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 8 9 . 6 3 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 0 . 2 3 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 5 . 6 0 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 7 7 . 3 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 8 9 . 7 3 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 0 . 3 3 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 5 . 5 7 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 2 4 . 6 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 8 9 . 9 4 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 0 . 5 4 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 5 . 4 7 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 9 6 . 9 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 9 0 . 2 3 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 0 . 8 1 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 6 . 4 4 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 7 . 7 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 9 4 . 2 5 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 4 . 8 2 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 6 . 5 4 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 4 1 . 0 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 9 4 . 3 8 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 4 . 9 5 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 6 . 5 9 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 5 5 . 4 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 9 4 . 4 4 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 5 . 0 0 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 6 . 7 4 SAN. WYE STA=1+95.2 SAN. WYE IE=993.10 SAN. STUB IE=993.97 CURB STOP ELEV.=1002.58 STUB 4" SANITARY SERVICE TO 5' FROM BUILDING COORD. W/MECH'L TYP. 1.5" COPPER WATER SERVICE W/CURB STOP AND BOX, TYP. 8"X8"X8" TEE PROPOSED 8" GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX 3.00' TYP. 8" TO 6" REDUCER Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 8/5/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 08/05/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C4.0 UTILITY PLAN SANITARY & WATER .. .. .. .. .. .. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: UTILITY LEGEND: CITY OF MEDINA UTILITY NOTES: 1.THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED ASSOCIATED WITH VARIATIONS IN THE UTILITY ASBUILT PLANS, ELEVATIONS 0R LOCATIONS. 2.WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5' OF COVER. 3.THE CITY REQUIRES TELEVISING FOR SANITARY SEWER PIPE INSTALLATIONS PRIOR TO ACCEPTING A WARRANTY FOR THE UTILITY SYSTEMS; PROVIDE REPORT AND VIDEO FILES TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW. 4.MAINTAIN 18'INCH SEPARATION, 4" RIGID INSULATION AT ANY LOCATION WHERE STORM OR SANITARY SEWER CROSSES WATERMAIN. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R CATCH BASIN GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATER MAIN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT MANHOLE FES AND RIP RAP 1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 4.UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 5.CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. 6.ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION. 10.UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. 11.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 12.ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13.HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL. 14.A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL. 15.A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 16.ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED. 18.COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 19.COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 20.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 21.ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 22.2CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. 23.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. 24.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES. 26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0. 27.FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS 25' IN EACH DIRECTION. SEE PLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALL LOW POINT DRAIN TILE PER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N A203 A4 REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201 G11 A201 A6 INLET PROTECTION AT CATCH BASINS, TYP Pavers 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 12" RCP 8" PVC 12" WM 15 " RC P Bit u m i n o u s T r a i l 8" PVC 16" WM 12" WM 16" WM EXISTING RAINWATER NATURE AREA SIGN WHERE WATER CROSSES STORM OR SANITARY, MAINTAIN 18" SEPARATION AND INCLUDE 4" RIGID INSULATION, TYP. HYDRANT & G.V., TYP. SANMH 5 RE= 1003.50 IE(E)= 989.39 IE(S)=989.29 SANMH 7 RE= 1005.20 IE(N)= 989.05 IE(W)=988.95 SANMH 8 RE= 996.20 IE(E)= 984.83 IE(S)=984.73 87 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% 61 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.40% 196 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 2.10% 39 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @ 0.75% MAKE CORE DRILL CONNECTION TO EXISTING SAN. MH EX RE=995.84 EX IE (SE)=984.34 EX IE (NW)=984.32 PR. IE (NE)=984.44 CROSSING INFO IE SANITARY=988.17 TOP STORM=987.72 REDUCER SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 3 4 . 9 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 8 9 . 5 6 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 0 . 1 6 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 5 . 8 5 SA N . W Y E S T A = 0 + 5 3 . 3 SA N . W Y E I E = 9 8 9 . 6 3 SA N . S T U B I E = 9 9 0 . 2 3 CU R B S T O P E L E V . = 1 0 0 5 . 6 0 Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 8/5/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 08/05/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C4.1 UTILITY PLAN SANITARY & WATER OFFSITE .. .. .. .. .. .. UTILITY LEGEND: Know what's below. before you dig.Call R CATCH BASIN GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATER MAIN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT MANHOLE FES AND RIP RAP 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DN DN DN DN DN A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT R 2 8 . 0 ' R24.0 ' R5.0 ' R6.0' EOF 1000 . 7 6 EOF 1001.00 EOF 1001.15 EOF 1010.00 HAMEL ROAD Pavers Pavers (f.k.a. Rockford Road) 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bit u m i n o u s T r a i l 16" WM 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E 120" CMP UNDERGROUND FILTRATION SYSTEM 24.50'X67' FOOTPRINT (INCL. SIDE AND END STONE) ACCESS RIM=1000.95± TOP OF PIPE=999.00 IE 12" OUTLET=994.60 PIPE IE=989.00 18" SAND BASE IE=987.50 6" PERF. DRAINTILE IE=987.50 100-YR HWL=999.13 100-YR B2B HWL=999.18 59LF 18" RCP @ 0.50% 41 LF 18" HDPE @ 4.54% 78 LF 18" RCP @ 0.50% 4" FLEXIBLE PERFORATED DRAINTILE IE=998.00 0.00% SLOPE 13 LF 15" HDPE @ 9.31% 15" INLET IE=995.00 6" PVC DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION LINE @ 2.00% (TYP.) 12" INLET IE=995.00 MH 21 RE=1009.00 IE=1006.26 8" NYLOPLAST AREA DRAIN W/ SQUARE GRATE, TYP., POSITION AT DOWNSPOUT DISCHARGES, COORD. W/ ARCHITECTURE. MH 22 RE=1009.00 IE=1005.76 MH 24 RE=1010.50 IE=1004.74 MH 33 RE=1003.85 IE=1000.71 CBMH 35 RE=1002.51 IE=998.94 MH 36 RE=1001.90 IE=997.30 SUMP=993.30 15" INLET IE=995.00 6 LF 15" HDPE @ 2.00% 5 LF 15" HDPE @ 2.00% 37 LF 12" PVC STORM @ 6.22% MH 32 RE=1005.75 IE=1002.27 MH 31 RE=1007.75 IE=1002.79 MH 30 RE=1009.42 IE=1003.22 MH 29 RE=1005.97 IE=1003.35 MH 28 RE=1007.22 IE=1003.77 CBMH 27 RE=1009.08 IE=1003.98 MH 26 RE=1010.50 IE=1004.19 MH 23 RE=1010.50 IE=1005.24 50 LF 6" PVC @ 1.00% 52 LF 8" PVC @ 1.00% 50 LF 8" PVC @ 1.00% 50 LF 8" PVC @ 1.00% 5 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% 21 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% 21 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% 13 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% 43 LF 12" PVC @ 1.00% 52 LF 12" PVC @ 1.00% 52 LF 12" PVC @ 3.00% 51LF 12" PVC @ 3.00% 66LF 12" PVC @ 2.48% 42 LF 10" PVC @ 1.00% 15" OUTLET IE=994.60 14 LF 15" HDPE @ 1.00% DRAWDOWN RISER BAFFLE WALL , TYP. TOP=991.00 ACCESS RISER, TYP. MH 20 RE=1009.00 IE=1006.76 50 LF 6" PVC @ 1.00% AD20 AD21 AD22 AD23 AD24 AD25 AD30 AD31 AD32 AD33 AD34 CLEANOUT, TYP MH 34 RE=1002.80 IE=999.18 8LF 12" PVC @ 3.00% 40 LF 15" HDPE @ 2.00% MH 25 RE=1010.50 IE=1004.24 STMH 2 RIM=989.61 IE=985.25 CBMH 4 RIM=999.96 IE (DT)=998.00 IE(E/W)=985.64 FES 1 IE=984.96 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 5 RE=1000.83 IE (E, 15")=994.46 IE (W, 18")=987.50 12" ORIFICE=994.60 12" ORIFICE=995.40 WEIR WALL=998.70 IE (DT)=987.50 48" CBMH 5AWITH NEENAH 3508-A2 CASTING RE=1000.26 IE=996.33 48" CBMH 6 WITH NEENAH 3508-A2 CASTING RE=1000.54 IE=995.00 SUMP IE=991.00 60" CBMH 5 WITH NEENAH 3508-A2 CASTING RE=1000.26 IE=996.21 SUMP IE=992.21 INSTALL CONTECH JELLYFISH FILTER 48" CB 6A WITH NEENAH 3508-A2 CASTING RE=1000.54 IE=995.12 FUTURE CBMH 11 RE=1009.43 IE=1000.86 CONSTRUCT OVER EXISTING STORM SEWER STUB 2" SUMP PUMP DISCHARGE TO WITHIN 10' FROM BUILDING, COORD. W/MECH'L CLEANOUT, TYP. IE=1000.05 4" HDPE SUMP DISCHARGE, TYP. 186 LF 6" HDPE @ 2.00% 48" CBMH 5B WITH NEENAH 3508-A2 CASTING RE=1000.90 IE=997.13 Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 8/5/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 44263 Matthew R. Pavek LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 08/05/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C4.3 UTILITY PLAN STORMWATER .. .. .. .. .. .. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: UTILITY LEGEND: CITY OF MEDINA UTILITY NOTES: 1.THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED ASSOCIATED WITH VARIATIONS IN THE UTILITY ASBUILT PLANS, ELEVATIONS 0R LOCATIONS. 2.WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5' OF COVER. 3.THE CITY REQUIRES TELEVISING FOR SANITARY SEWER PIPE INSTALLATIONS PRIOR TO ACCEPTING A WARRANTY FOR THE UTILITY SYSTEMS; PROVIDE REPORT AND VIDEO FILES TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW. 4.MAINTAIN 18'INCH SEPARATION, 4" RIGID INSULATION AT ANY LOCATION WHERE STORM OR SANITARY SEWER CROSSES WATERMAIN. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R CATCH BASIN GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATER MAIN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT MANHOLE FES AND RIP RAP 1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 4.UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 5.CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. 6.ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION. 10.UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. 11.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 12.ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13.HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL. 14.A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL. 15.A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 16.ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED. 18.COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 19.COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 20.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 21.ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 22.2CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. 23.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. 24.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES. 26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0. 27.FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS 25' IN EACH DIRECTION. SEE PLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALL LOW POINT DRAIN TILE PER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 G11 20 . 0 ' 5' SETBACK 20' SETBACK 8' S E T B A C K 8.0' 8.0' 8' S E T B A C K CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CO N S T R U C T I O N L I M I T CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EOF 1000 . 7 6 EOF 1001.00 EOF 1001.15 EOF 1010.00 18" DECORATIVE ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP. 18" DECORATIVE ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP. HAMEL ROAD S73°12'09"E 290.00 S1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 8 " W 3 1 7 . 3 4 N74°53'27"W 290.00 N1 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 6 " E 3 2 5 . 8 9 12" RCP 3 0 " R C P 18" RCP 8" PVC8" PVC 12" WM 15 " RC P SOO LINE RAILROAD (Width Varies) Bit u m i n o u s T r a i l 36" HDPE 36 " H D P E REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN .. .. .. .. .. .. Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 8/5/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 25821 Robert L. Binder 08/05/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 Know what's below. before you dig.Call R LEGEND PROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES EDGING - HVY. DUTY, COMMERCIAL GRADE, BLACK VINYL, INCLUDE ALL CONNECTORS, STAKES & APPURTENANCES PER MANUF. INSTALL PER MANUF. DECORATIVE BOULDERS (ROUNDED & BLOCK STYLE), 18"-30" DIA. LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1.WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH (MINIMUM AFTER INSTALLATION AND/OR TOP DRESSING OPERATIONS) OF DECORATIVE ROCK MULCH - 3" DK. GREY CRUSHED TRAP ROCK, SAMPLES REQ. 2.ALL TREES NOT IN SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK. 3.IF SHOWN ON PLAN, RANDOM SIZED LIMESTONE BOULDERS COLOR AND SIZE TO COMPLIMENT NEW LANDSCAPING. OWNER TO APPROVE BOULDER SAMPLES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 4.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD. 5.UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 6.CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE. 7.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 6" LAYER TOPSOIL AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 8.COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 9.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE. 10.REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. 11.SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. 12.PROVIDE SITE WIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY PROGRAMMABLE AND CAPABLE OF ALTERNATE DATE WATERING. THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE HEAD TO HEAD OR DRIP COVERAGE AND BE CAPABLE OF DELIVERING ONE INCH OF PRECIPITATION PER WEEK. SYSTEM SHALL EXTEND INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT/BACK OF CURB. 13.CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE APPROVAL OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM INCLUDING PRICING FROM OWNER, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N SEE SHEET L1.1 FOR PLANT SCHEDULE AND GROUND COVER LEGEND TREES CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY AS2 6 Sienna Glen Maple / Acer x freemanii `Sienna` TM 3.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR Y RB 6 River Birch / Betula nigra 3.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE Y BS 3 Shiloh Splash Birch / Betula nigra `Shiloh Splash`3.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR Y CP 3 Prairie Sentinel Hackberry / Celtis occidentalis `JFS-KSU1` TM 3.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR Y GD 6 Street Keeper Honey Locust / Gleditsia triacanthos `Draves` TM 3.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR Y EK 4 Espresso Kentucky Coffeetree / Gymnocladus dioica `Espresso`3.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR Y QS 5 Swamp Oak / Quercus bicolor 3.5" Cal. B&B NATIVE Y EVERGREEN TREES CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY JE 13 Eastern Red Cedar / Juniperus virginiana 10` B&B NATIVE PD 4 Black Hills Spruce / Picea glauca `Densata`10` B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR PT 9 White Pine / Pinus strobus 10` B&B NATIVE ORNAMENTAL TREES CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY CV 6 Serviceberry / Amelanchier x grandiflora 2" Cal. B&B NATIVE Y MS 8 Whitespire Birch / Betula populifolia 'Whitespire'2" Cal. B&B NATIVE Y MB 14 Redbud / Cercis canadensis (MN Strain)2" CAL. B&B NATIVE CULTIVAR Y SHRUBS CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY DL 9 Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle / Diervilla lonicera #5 CONT NATIVE Y HA 13 Annabelle Hydrangea / Hydrangea arborescens `Annabelle`#5 CONT NATIVE CULTIVAR Y SGJ 35 Sea Green Juniper / Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green`5 gal.NOT NATIVE N JM2 4 Medora Juniper / Juniperus scopulorum `Medora`#5 CONT NOT NATIVE N MD 25 Russian Cypress / Microbiota decussata #5 CONT NOT NATIVE N PD2 0 Little Devil Dwarf Ninebark / Physocarpus opulifolius 'Donna May' TM #5 CONT RE 2 Como Park Easy Elegance Rose / Rosa x `BAlark` TM #5 CONT NOT NATIVE Y TT 16 Taunton`s Yew / Taxus x media `Tauntonii`#5 CONT NOT NATIVE N GRASSES CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY CK 121 Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass / Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster'#1 CONT SB 94 Blue Heaven Little Bluestem / Schizachyrium scoparium `Blue Heaven`#1 CONT Pot PERENNIALS CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NATIVE PLANTS POLLINATOR FRIENDLY HA2 76 Daylily / Hemerocallis x `Chicago Apache`#1 CONT HS 23 Stella Supreme Daylily / Hemerocallis x 'Stella Supreme'#1 CONT NL2 36 Catmint / Nepeta racemosa `Little Titch`#1 CONT PLANT SCHEDULE GROUND COVERS COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE Dog Park Mulch / Dog Park Mulch Organic mulch specifically preoduced for use in dog parks. Shall knit together to form matted, accessible surface, shall be treated with anti-microbial agent. Mulch Shooting Star No Mow Fine Fescue Mix / No MowSeed Mix Seed Mix Rock Maintanence Strip / Rock Maintanence Strip 1" River rock over filter fabric, include edging as shown & needed. See detail. Mulch Blue Grass Based / Sod Commercial grade, locally grown, "Big Roll" preferred Sod GROUND COVER LEGEND REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION L1.1 LANDSCAPE NOTES, DETAILS & SCHEDULE .. .. .. .. .. .. Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 34 2 H A M E L R D , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 18 5 0 W W A Y Z A T A B L V D , L O N G L A K E , M N 5 5 3 5 6 HA M E L T O W N H O M E S , L L C PR O J E C T PR E L I M I N A R Y : NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION .. .. .. .. .. .. PROJECT NUMBER:21266 11/16/2021 CONCEPT PLAN 3/22/2022 CITY RESUBMITTAL 7/1/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 7/11/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 8/5/2022 FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 10/5/2021 CONCEPT PLAN DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:EH RB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2021 LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 25821 Robert L. Binder 08/05/2022 CITY SUBMITTAL2/4/2022 Know what's below. before you dig.Call R 1.ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2.SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IRRIGATION WATER, METER, AND POWER CONNECTIONS. 3.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/INSTALLATION. ANY DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CORRECTING DAMAGES SHALL BE BORNE ENTIRELY BY THE CONTRACTOR. 4.SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY STANDARDS AND SHALL BE PER NATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES. EXACT LOCATION OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUIVALENT AT THE JOB SITE. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY FOR THE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND METERING FACILITIES. 6.IRRIGATION WATER LINE CONNECTION SIZE IS 1-12" AT BUILDING. VERIFY WITH MECHANICAL PLANS.COVAGE. 7.ALL MAIN LINES SHALL BE 18" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 8.ALL LATERAL LINES SHALL BE 12" BELLOW FINISHED GRADE. 9.ALL EXPOSED PVC RISERS, IF ANY, SHALL BE GRAY IN COLOR. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL LAY ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT AT 2'-0" BELOW THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE TOP OF PAVEMENT. EXTEND SLEEVES TO 2'-0" BEYOND PAVEMENT. 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK THE LOCATION OF ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT WITH THE SLEEVING MATERIAL "ELLED" TO 2'-0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AND CAPPED. 12.FABRICATE ALL PIPE TO MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH CLEAN AND SQUARE CUT JOINTS. USE QUALITY GRADE PRIMER AND SOLVENT CEMENT FORMULATED FOR INTENDED TYPE OF CONNECTION. 13.BACKFILL ALL TRENCHES WITH SOIL FREE OF SHARP OBJECTS AND DEBRIS. 14.ALL VALVE BOXES AND COVERS SHALL BE BLACK IN COLOR. 15.GROUP VALVE BOXES TOGETHER FOR EASE WHEN SERVICE IS REQUIRED. LOCATE IN PLANT BED AREAS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 16.IRRIGATION CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED ON-SITE WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 17.CONTROL WIRES: 14 GAUGE DIRECT BURIAL, SOLID COPPER IRRIGATION WIRE. RUN UNDER MAIN LINE. USE MOISTURE-PROOF SPLICES AND SPLICE ONLY AT VALVES OR PULL BOXES. RUN SEPARATE HOT AND COMMON WIRE TO EACH VALVE AND ONE (1) SPARE WIRE AND GROUND TO FURTHEST VALVE FROM CONTROLLER. LABEL OR COLOR CODE ALL WIRES. 18.AVOID OVER SPRAY ON BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, WALLS AND ROADWAYS BY INDIVIDUALLY ADJUSTING RADIUS OR ARC ON SPRINKLER HEADS AND FLOW CONTROL ON AUTOMATIC VALVE. 19.ADJUST PRESSURE REGULATING VALVES FOR OPTIMUM PRESSURE ON SITE. 20.USE SCREENS ON ALL HEADS. 21.A SET OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON-SITE AT ALL TIMES IN AN UPDATED CONDITION. 22.ALL PIPE 3" AND OVER SHALL HAVE THRUST BLOCKING AT EACH TURN. 23.ALL AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVES WILL HAVE 3" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL UNDERNEATH VALVE AND VALVE BOX. GRAVEL SHALL EXTENT 3" BEYOND PERIMETER OF VALVE BOX. 24.THERE SHALL BE 3" MINIMUM SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX COVER AND TOP OF VALVE STRUCTURE. IRRIGATION NOTES: FACE OF BUILDING, WALL, OR STRUCTURE MIN. 3" LAYER OF ROCK MULCH AS SPECIFIED. PROVIDE SAMPLE TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FINISHED GRADE COMPACTED SUBGRADE WATER PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AS SPECIFIED 24" - VERIFY W/ PLAN AGGREGATE MAINTANENCE STRIP - 24" N T S STAKED LANDSCAPE EDGER AS SPECIFIED, SEE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND SPECS. FOR INSTALLATION AND PLACEMENT SLOPE - MIN. 2%, MAX. 5:1 VERIFY W/ GRADING PLAN 1 PERENNIAL BED PLANTING N T S PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE ROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TO ENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACT SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED EXISTING GRADE ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT STEM BACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATION DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL. SIZE VARIES SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT 4 DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS SHRUB PLANTING N T S PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL SHAPE FOR SPECIES) PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE ROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TO ENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACT SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED EXISTING GRADE ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT TRUNK BACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATION DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL. THREE TIMES WIDTH OF ROOTBALL RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT 3 THREE TIMES WIDTH OF ROOTBALL DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING N T S PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE 2"X4"X8' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120° TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH NYLON STRAPPING WITH GROMMETS. ALTERNATE STABILIZING METHODS MAY BE PROPOSED BY CONTRACTOR. TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1"-2" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT TRUNK EXISTING GRADE CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. IF NON-BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED COMPACT BOTTOM OF PIT, TYP. RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT 2 LEGEND SEE SHEET L1.0 FOR LANDSCAPE LEGEND ALL PLANTING BEDS & BUILDING MAINTENANCE STRIPS - 3" DK. GREY CRUSHED TRAP ROCK. INCLUDE PERMEABLE GEO-TEXTILE (PER DETAIL) IN MAINTENANCE STRIP AREAS ONLY. SAMPLES REQ. BEFORE INSTALLATION. PROVIDE EDGING AS SHOWN ON PLAN REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT:480 CAL. IN. PROVIDED TREE REPLACEMENT: CANOPY:166 CAL. IN. EVERGREEN:117 CAL. IN. ORNAMENTAL: 42 CAL. IN. TOTAL PROVIDED:325 CAL. IN. TREE REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS: 30 7 B S W M a r k e t S t . , L e e ' s S u m m i t , M i s s o u r i 6 4 0 6 3 | 81 6 . 2 4 9 . 2 2 7 0 | w w w . c o l l i n s a n d w e b b . c o m NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COLLINS WEBB #: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 29 JUNE 2022 21082 342 Hamel Road, Medina, MN 55340 OWNER ARCHITECT CIVIL ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MEP ENGINEER HAMEL TOWNHOMES LLC COLLINS WEBB ARCHITECTURE 307B SW MARKET STREET LEE'S SUMMIT, MO 64063 P: 816.249.2270 www.collinsandwebb.com CIVIL SITE GROUP 5000 GLENWOOD AVE GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55416 P: 612.615.0060 www.civilsitegroup.com LEIGH & O'KANE 250 NE MULBERRY SUITE 201 LEE'S SUMMIT, M0 64086 P: 816.444.3144 www.leok.com/ PKMR ENGINEERS 13300 W 98TH STREET LENEXA, KS 66215 P: 913.492.2400 www.pkmreng.com/ GENERAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME CS COVER SHEET G001 GENERAL INFORMATION G002 ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES G003 WALL AND ROOF GENERAL DETAILS G111 LIFE SAFETY INFORMATION G500 GENERAL INFORMATION G501 GENERAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME AS100 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A101 FLOOR PLANS - BUILDING A A102 FLOOR PLANS - BUILDING C A103 FLOOR PLANS - BUILDING D A104 FLOOR PLANS - BUILDING E A121 UNIT PLANS AND DETAILS A201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING A A202 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING C A203 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING D A204 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING E UNDER REVIEWFinal Plat Application 30 JUNE 2022 1005.96 1005.19 ME 1001.15 1009.43LP/CB 1010.84 ME 1010.65 ME 1011.10 ME 1002.00 1002.00 1003.00 1003.00 1004.00 1004.00 1005.00 1005.00 1003.00 1003.00 1004.00 1004.00 1005.00 1005.00 1006.00 1006.00 1010.50 1009.98 1010.80 ME 1010.90 ME 1002.03 ME 1006.72 ME 1002.80 1002.27 TW 990.08 BW 1006.15 1006.15 1006.15 1006.15 1001.15 HP 1007.00 1007.00 1000.74 1005.25 1007.00 1007.00 1001.29 1001.77 1004.46 1011.00 1011.00TS 1005.03 996.00 W.O. 996.00 W.O. 1005.47 1005.65 1004.90 1000.26 LP 1000.54 LP 1000.00 L.O. 995.00 W.O. 995.00 W.O. 994.00 W.O. 994.00 W.O. 1010.15 1010.15 1010.15 1010.15 1011.00 1011.00 995.80 TW992.50 BW 997.62 BW 1002.27 TW 995.04 BW 1001.36 TW 994.90 TW994.50 BW 989.28 BW 1000.14 TW992.53 BW 1008.52 ME 1010.01 ME/G 1006.00 BW 1000.00 L.O. 1000.00BW 1002.82 1002.30 1000.16 1004.00 1004.00 1004.00 1006.00 1006.00 1000.87 1004.77 1004.72 1004.61 1005.99 1002.01 1010.00 1010.00 1008.00 1008.00 1000.03 1003.00 1004.96 ME 1010.00 TW 1011.00 TW 1010.98 ME 1010.07 ME 994.00 TW992.47 BW 995.80 TW995.50 BW 999.41 BW 1000.31 TW 994.01 BW 1001.14 TW 990.67 BW 1000.99 TW 1010.00 TW1005.89 BW 1007.00 BW 1011.00 TW1007.00 BW 1009.87 HP 1009.93 ME/CB 1010.15 ME 1009.44 ME 1002.00 1004.52 ME/G 1005.60 ME 1008.17 ME 1007.51 ME 1009.02 ME 1009.71 ME 1010.11 ME 1010.63 ME/HP 1001.00 TS/EOF 1002.80 TW 999.96 LP 1005.25 1005.25 1004.25 1004.25 1003.25 1003.25 1001.00 TW 989.64 BS20 STEPS @ 7" 994.00 TW 994.00BW 990.49 BW 994.00 1001.85 1010.70 1008.05 1010.90 1010.94 ME 1009.75 1007.75 999.17 ME 1005.36 1007.38 1005.30 ME 1005.02 ME 1010.42 1010.82 1008.86 1009.78 1001.14 1001.35 1005.08DROP FOUNDATION 1010.88 ME 1010.00 1010.35 ME 1010.50 LP 1010.75LP 1010.50 LP 1010.50 TW1006.13 BW 1003.75 1005.75 1008.52 ME 1002.08DROP FOUNDATION1003.58 991.00 BW 994.90 TW 1001.77 1001.64 1001.01 1001.00EOF 1000.32 1000.17 1000.48 1008.95 HP 1008.50 1006.60 1006.08 1010.15TS 1008.00 1009.27 1006.68 1008.08 1010.90 HP1011.00 TW1006.71 BW 1001.30BC 1005.42 1004.28 1006.48 1005.05 1001.34 1006.75 1006.33 1001.75BC 1002.21BC 1001.49 1006.02 1005.98 1006.48 1004.04 1003.33 1010.43 1010.50 1010.50BS 1009.33 1009.36 1010.40 1010.95 1004.50 1001.02 1001.22 1004.74 1002.51 LP 998.85 1002.36 1005.48 1005.00TW 1003.95TW 1001.66BW 1010.15TS 999.50 1005.68 1007.33 1010.40 1010.90 1010.05 1005.88 1006.11BS 1005.85 1010.05 1009.65BS 1008.00 1009.00 1005.15 1005.80 1005.64 1005.97 1006.75 1005.23 1005.98 1005.78 1006.02 1005.13 1005.88 1005.48T 1005.48T 1004.48T 1004.48T 1003.48T 1003.48T 1002.67BC 1003.12BC 1003.59BC 1003.10 1001.63 1003.20 HP 992.96 993.90 990.44 1002.00 999.24 998.43 1009.46 1006.33 1005.33 1005.33 1004.33 1004.33 1003.33 1003.33 1003.58 1003.58 1004.58 1004.58 1005.58 1005.58 1004.33 1006.48 1006.48 1002.33 1003.33 1002.33 1004.33 1005.33 1005.33 1007.33 1007.33 1007.33 991 9 9 4 9 9 6 9 9 7 9 9 8 999 1001 1 0 0 1 1001 1001 1 0 0 1 1002 1002 1002 1002 10 02 1002 1003 1 0 0 3 1003 1003 1003 1004 1004 1004 1004 1004 1006 1006 10 06 1006 1 0 0 6 1007 1007 1 0 0 7 1008 1008 1 0 0 9 1 0 0 9 1011 990 9 9 5 1000 1005 1005 1005 1005 1005 1 0 0 5 1005 101 0 1 0 1 0 1003.92 1004.16 BUILDING A BUILDING B BUILDING D BUILDING C BUILDING E ISSUE DATE: COLLINS WEBB #: PROFESSIONAL SEAL COPYRIGHT © BY COLLINS WEBB ARCHITECTURE, LLC K J H G F E D C B A 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 K J H G F E D C B A REVISION DATES: 30 7 B S W M a r k e t S t r e e t , L e e ' s S u m m i t , M i s s o u r i , 6 4 0 6 3 P : 8 1 6 . 2 4 9 . 2 2 7 0 w w w . c o l l i n s a n d w e b b . c o m UN D E R R E V I E W 6/ 2 9 / 2 0 2 2 2 : 1 3 : 4 0 P M ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 29 JUNE 2022 21082 34 2 H a m e l R o a d , M e d i n a , M N 5 5 3 4 0 DE S I G N D E V E L O P M E N T AS1001" = 20'-0"B8 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN BUILDING A BUILDING B BUILDING C BUILDING D BUILDING E Fi n a l P l a t A p p l i c a t i o n REF.REF.DW DW REF.REF.DW DW W W D W W D GENERAL NOTES: FLOOR PLANS 1.SEE GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DETAILS THAT ARE APPLICABLE. 2.ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION 100'-0" 3.DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN ARE TO THE FACE OF STUD (FOS), FACE OF MASONRY (FOM), FACE OF CONCRETE WALLS (FOC), AND COLUMN GRID LINES, UNLESS NOTED OR SHOWN OTHERWISE. 4.NOTE: WALL THICKNESSES ARE ACTUAL DIMENSIONS AND PER WALL TYPES. SEE GENERAL SHEETS. 5.DOOR OPENINGS NOT LOCATED BY DIMENSION SHALL BE CENTERED IN WALL SHOWN OR LOCATED 4 INCHES FROM FINISH WALL TO HINGE SIDE OF THE DOOR, ALWAYS ALLOWING A MINIMUM OF 18" FROM THE PULL SIDE (STRIKE SIDE) OF THE DOOR TO THE INTERSECTING WALL, OR OTHER PROTRUDING OBJECTS. 6.ALL ALCOVES WITHOUT A SPACE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER SHALL HAVE THE SAME FINISHES AS THE ADJOINING SPACES. 7.RE: FINISH LEGEND, FINISH SCHEDULE AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR DOOR AND DOOR FRAME FINISHES. 8.STAIR ENCLOSURES, SHAFT WALLS, EXIT PASSAGE WAYS AND EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE COORDINATED FOR PHASE OF WORK PER MATRIX AND PROJECT SCOPING. 9.MAINTAIN AND PROTECT EXISTING EXPANSION JOINTS DURING CONSTRUCTION. PATCH/REPAIR/REPLACE TO MATCH EXISTING RATINGS AS REQUIRED ON THE SHELL PORTION OF PROJECT. 10. ALL WOOD PRODUCTS TO BE FIRE-RETARDANT, INCLUDING BLOCKING AND PLYWOOD. 11.EXTERIOR PORCH DESIGN VERIES PER BUILDING, REFER TO BUILDING PLANS FOR PORCH DETAILS AND DIMENSIONS. 12.GARAGE ELEVATION VERIES PER BUILDING. REFER TO BUILDING PLANS FOR GARAGE ELEVATION AND ASSOCIATED STAIR LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONING. A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 6' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"6' - 0" 6' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"6' - 0" 104' - 0" 13' - 6"12' - 6"12' - 6"13' - 6"13' - 6"12' - 6"12' - 6"13' - 6" 104' - 0" 49 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 1' - 4 1/2" 13' - 4"9' - 3 1/2"2' - 0" 2' - 0"9' - 3 1/2"13' - 4" 1' - 4 1/2"1' - 4 1/2" 6' - 5" 4' - 10"4' - 10" 6' - 5" 2' - 0" 2' - 0" 13' - 4"9' - 3 1/2"9' - 3 1/2"13' - 4" 1' - 4 1/2" 6' - 0 " 6' - 9"6' - 9"6' - 9"6' - 9" A201 D11 A201A11 A201 G11 A201 A6 11' - 0"15' - 4 1/2"14' - 10 1/2"21' - 9"15' - 4 1/2"14' - 10 1/2"10' - 9" 52' - 0"52' - 0" 4" 4" 35 ' - 1 1 " 8' - 6 " 44 ' - 5 " 13' - 6"25' - 0"27' - 0"25' - 0"13' - 6" 104' - 0" 6' - 9"6' - 9"6' - 9"6' - 9"6' - 9" 6' - 9"6' - 9"6' - 9" 7' - 0" EQ EQ 7' - 0" EQ EQ 7' - 0" EQ EQ EQ EQ 7' - 0" 3" / 1 2 " 6" / 12"6" / 12" 3" / 1 2 " 6" / 12"6" / 12" 3" / 1 2 " 6" / 12"6" / 12" 3" / 1 2 " 6" / 12"6" / 12" 4" / 12" 4" / 1 2 " 4" / 1 2 " 4" / 12"4" / 12" 4" / 1 2 " 4" / 12" 2 1/2" / 12" 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 6" / 12"6" / 12" 6" / 12"6" / 12" 6" / 12"6" / 12" 6" / 12"6" / 12"6" / 12"6" / 12"6" / 12"6" / 12" ISSUE DATE: COLLINS WEBB #: PROFESSIONAL SEAL COPYRIGHT © BY COLLINS WEBB ARCHITECTURE, LLC K J H G F E D C B A 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 K J H G F E D C B A REVISION DATES: 30 7 B S W M a r k e t S t . , L e e ' s S u m m i t , M i s s o u r i 6 4 0 6 3 | 8 1 6 . 2 4 9 . 2 2 7 0 | ww w . c o l l i n s a n d w e b b . c o m 6/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 2 9 : 5 4 : 2 0 A M FLOOR PLANS -BUILDING A HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 24 JUNE 2022 21082 34 2 H a m e l R o a d , M e d i n a , M N 5 5 3 4 0 DE S I G N D E V E L O P M E N T R E V I E W A101 1/8" = 1'-0"A6 1ST FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING A (BUILDING B MIRR.) 1/8" = 1'-0"F6 2ND FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING A (BUILDING B MIRR.) 1/8" = 1'-0"F12 ROOF PLAN - BUILDING A (BUILDING B MIRR.) ND E R R E V I E W ES I G N D E V E L O P M E N T Fi n a l P l a t A p p l i c a t i o n RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW D W RE F . RE F . DW D W W WD W WD W WD A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 13 ' - 6 " 25 ' - 0 " 27 ' - 0 " 25 ' - 0 " 27 ' - 0 " 25 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 6 " 15 6 ' - 0 " 13' - 0 1/2" 5' - 7"17' - 4"13' - 11 3/4" 49' - 11 1/4" 6' - 0 " 40 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 40 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 40 ' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 1' - 6 " 1' - 6 " 8' - 4 " 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 8' - 4 " 10 4 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 12 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 6 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 12 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 6 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 12 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 6 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 9" 6' - 5 1 / 2 " 6' - 5 1 / 2 " 6' - 5 1 / 2 " 6' - 5 1 / 2 " 6' - 5 1 / 2 " 6' - 5 1 / 2 " 1' - 6 " 8 ' - 4 " 2 ' - 8 " 2 ' - 8 " 8 ' - 4 " 1 ' - 6 " 1' - 6 " 8' - 4 " 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 8' - 4 " 1' - 6 " 4' - 6 1/4" 13' - 4"10' - 7" RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . DW DW DW DW DW DW A202 G10 A202D10 A202 A10 A202 A5 35' - 11 1/2"7' - 10" 43' - 9 1/2" 13 ' - 6 " 25 ' - 0 " 27 ' - 0 " 25 ' - 0 " 52 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 6 " 15 6 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 9 " 14 ' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 15 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 21 ' - 9 " 14 ' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 15 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 22 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 14 ' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 10 ' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6 ' - 7 1 / 2 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6 ' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 0" 13' - 4"10' - 7" 7' - 0 " 7' - 0 " 7' - 0 " 7' - 0 " 7' - 0 " 7' - 0 " 6' - 9 " 6 ' - 9 " EQ E Q EQ E Q EQ E Q EQ E Q EQ EQ EQ E Q 6' - 0" 13' - 4"10' - 7" D W D W D W W W W 7" / 12" 6" / 1 2 " 6" / 1 2 " 3" / 12" 3" / 12" 3" / 1 2 " 3" / 1 2 " 3" / 12" 3" / 1 2 " 3" / 12" 3" / 1 2 " 3" / 12" 3" / 1 2 " 7" / 12" 6" / 12" 7" / 12" 6" / 12" 7" / 12" 6" / 12" 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 4" / 12" 4" / 12" 4 1/2" / 12" 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 3" / 1 2 " 2 1 / 2 " / 1 2 " 16 ' - 8 " 16 ' - 8 " ISSUE DATE: COLLINS WEBB #: PROFESSIONAL SEAL COPYRIGHT © BY COLLINS WEBB ARCHITECTURE, LLC K J H G F E D C B A 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 K J H G F E D C B A REVISION DATES: 30 7 B S W M a r k e t S t r e e t , L e e ' s S u m m i t , M i s s o u r i , 6 4 0 6 3 P : 8 1 6 . 2 4 9 . 2 2 7 0 w w w . c o l l i n s a n d w e b b . c o m 6/ 2 9 / 2 0 2 2 2 : 1 0 : 5 1 P M FLOOR PLANS -BUILDING C HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 29 JUNE 2022 21082 34 2 H a m e l R o a d , M e d i n a , M N 5 5 3 4 0 DE S I G N D E V E L O P M E N T A1021/8" = 1'-0"A7 1ST FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C 1/8" = 1'-0"A4 2ND FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C 1/8" = 1'-0"A12 ROOF PLAN - BUILDING C UN D E R R E V I E W ND E R R E V I E W ES I G N D E V E L O P M E N T Fi n a l P l a t A p p l i c a t i o n W WD W WD W WD W WD RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW D W RE F . RE F . DW RE F . RE F . DW D W 7" / 12" 6" / 12" 7" / 12" 6" / 12" 7" / 12" 6" / 12" 7" / 12" 6" / 12" 3" / 1 2 " 3" / 12" 3" / 1 2 " 3" / 1 2 " 3" / 12" 6" / 1 2 " 6" / 1 2 " 3" / 12" 3" / 1 2 " 3" / 1 2 " 3" / 12" 3" / 12" 3" / 1 2 " 3" / 1 2 " 3" / 12" 3" / 12" 3" / 1 2 " 6" / 1 2 " 6" / 1 2 " 6" / 1 2 " 6" / 1 2 " 6" / 1 2 " 6" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " A203 A9 A203 A4 A203D12 35' - 11 1/2"7' - 10" 43' - 9 1/2" 13 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 6 " 13 ' - 6 " 26 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 13 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 26 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 13 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 26 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 13 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 20 8 ' - 0 " 35' - 11"7' - 10" 43' - 9" 10 ' - 9 " 14 ' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 15 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 11 ' - 0 " 52 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 9 " 14 ' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 15 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 11 ' - 0 " 11 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 14 ' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 10 ' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 8 1 / 2 " 6' - 9 1 / 2 " 6' - 8 1 / 2 " 7' - 0 " EQ EQ EQ E Q 7' - 0 " 7' - 0 " EQ E Q EQ EQ 7' - 0 " EQ E Q EQ EQ 7' - 0 " 6' - 9 1 / 2 " 6' - 8 1 / 2 " 13 ' - 6 " 7' - 0 " 7' - 0 " EQ EQ EQ E Q 7' - 0 " D W D W D W D W W W W W A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 A203D12 35' - 11 1/2"13' - 11 3/4" 49' - 11 1/4" 35' - 11"13' - 11 3/4" 49' - 10 3/4" 13 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 12 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 26 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 12 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 26 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 12 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 26 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 6 " 13 ' - 6 " 6' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 1' - 6 " 8 ' - 4 " 2 ' - 8 " 2 ' - 8 " 8 ' - 4 " 1 ' - 6 " 1' - 6 " 8' - 4 " 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 8' - 4 " 1' - 6 " 1' - 6 " 8' - 4 " 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 8' - 4 " 1' - 6 " 1' - 6 " 8' - 4 " 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 8' - 4 " 1' - 6 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 1 / 2 " 6' - 9 1 / 2 " RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW A203 A9 A203 A4 A203 H12 20 8 ' - 0 " 20 8 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 12 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 13 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 12 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 13 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 12 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 13 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 6 " 13 ' - 6 " 6' - 9 " 6' - 9 " 5' - 8 " 5' - 8 " 6' - 9 " 5' - 7 1 / 2 " 6' - 9 1 / 2 " 5' - 7 1 / 2 " 6' - 9 1 / 2 " 5' - 7 1 / 2 " 5' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 11 1 9 1 / 2 5 6 " ISSUE DATE: COLLINS WEBB #: PROFESSIONAL SEAL COPYRIGHT © BY COLLINS WEBB ARCHITECTURE, LLC K J H G F E D C B A 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 K J H G F E D C B A REVISION DATES: 30 7 B S W M a r k e t S t r e e t , L e e ' s S u m m i t , M i s s o u r i , 6 4 0 6 3 P : 8 1 6 . 2 4 9 . 2 2 7 0 w w w . c o l l i n s a n d w e b b . c o m 6/ 2 9 / 2 0 2 2 2 : 1 0 : 5 8 P M FLOOR PLANS -BUILDING D HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 29 JUNE 2022 21082 34 2 H a m e l R o a d , M e d i n a , M N 5 5 3 4 0 DE S I G N D E V E L O P M E N T A103 1/8" = 1'-0"A12 ROOF PLAN - BUILDING D 1/8" = 1'-0"9A 2ND FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING D 1/8" = 1'-0"6A 1ST FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING D 1/8" = 1'-0"2A BASEMENT - BUILDING D UN D E R R E V I E W ND E R R E V I E W ES I G N D E V E L O P M E N T Fi n a l P l a t A p p l i c a t i o n RE F . RE F . DW DW RE F . RE F . DW D W RE F . RE F . DW D W RE F . RE F . DW D W W W D W W D D D 6" / 1 2 " 6" / 1 2 " 6" / 12" 7" / 12" 3" / 12" 3" / 1 2 " 3" / 12" 3" / 12" 3" / 12" 3" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 4" / 12" 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 7" / 1 2 " 13 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 6 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 6 " 13 ' - 6 " A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 6' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 52 ' - 0 " 52 ' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 13' - 11 3/4"35' - 11 1/2" 49' - 11 1/4" G11 6' - 9 " RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . RE F . DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW 0"-4' - 0" -4' - 0"-4' - 0" 0" -4' - 0" -4' - 0" -2' - 0" -5' - 0" -5' - 0" -5' - 0" -2' - 0" -5' - 0" -6' - 0" -4' - 0" -6' - 0" -4' - 0" -6' - 0" -6' - 0" -7' - 0" -6' - 0" -7' - 0" -6' - 0" -7' - 0" -7' - 0" 20 8 ' - 0 " A204 A5 A204 E11 A204 A204 A10 13 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 6 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 6 " 13 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 9 " 15 ' - 3 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 11 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 3 " 10 ' - 9 " 7' - 10"35' - 11 1/2" 43' - 9 1/2" G11 13 ' - 6 " 6' - 9 " 6 ' - 9 " EQ EQ EQ EQ 7' - 0 " 7' - 0 " DW DW DW DW W W W W 20 8 ' - 0 " ISSUE DATE: COLLINS WEBB #: PROFESSIONAL SEAL COPYRIGHT © BY COLLINS WEBB ARCHITECTURE, LLC K J H G F E D C B A 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 K J H G F E D C B A REVISION DATES: 30 7 B S W M a r k e t S t r e e t , L e e ' s S u m m i t , M i s s o u r i , 6 4 0 6 3 P : 8 1 6 . 2 4 9 . 2 2 7 0 w w w . c o l l i n s a n d w e b b . c o m 6/ 2 9 / 2 0 2 2 2 : 1 1 : 0 3 P M FLOOR PLANS - BUILDING E HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 29 JUNE 2022 21082 34 2 H a m e l R o a d , M e d i n a , M N 5 5 3 4 0 DE S I G N D E V E L O P M E N T A104 1/8" = 1'-0"12A ROOF PLAN - BUILDING E 1/8" = 1'-0"4A 1ST FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING E1/8" = 1'-0"8A 2ND FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING E UN D E R R E V I E W ND E R R E V I E W ES I G N D E V E L O P M E N T Fi n a l P l a t A p p l i c a t i o n 1ST FLOOR 100' -0" 2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8" ROOF (TOP OF 2ND FLOOR WALL) 119' -3" BASEMENT 90' -1 3/4" 9' - 1 1 / 8 " 10 ' - 1 7 / 8 " 9' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 12 6 12 6 12 6 4A 6A 10C 1B 11A 2A 2A 1C 8A 12 6 12 6 12 6 12 6 12 6 9A GRADE PER CIVIL 1ST FLOOR 100' -0" 2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8" ROOF (TOP OF 2ND FLOOR WALL) 119' -3" BASEMENT 90' -1 3/4" 9' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 1 0 ' - 1 7 / 8 " 9 ' - 1 1 / 8 " 4C 4A 4B 1A 10C 10B10A 11A 6A 12 6 12 6 1C GRADE PER CIVIL 1ST FLOOR 100' -0" 2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8" ROOF (TOP OF 2ND FLOOR WALL) 119' -3" BASEMENT 90' -1 3/4" 9' - 1 1 / 8 " 10 ' - 1 7 / 8 " 9' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 1A 4C 2A 4A 2A 6A 8A 4B 9A 6A 2A 8A 8C 1C 10C GRADE PER CIVIL 1ST FLOOR 100' -0" 2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8" ROOF (TOP OF 2ND FLOOR WALL) 119' -3" BASEMENT 90' -1 3/4" BASEMENT 90' -1 3/4" 10 ' - 1 7 / 8 " 9 ' - 1 1 / 8 " 1A 6A 2A 4A 1C 7A 4A 1A 4B 2A 7A 1C 8A 1B 4B 4C 1A 4A 10C10D GRADE PER CIVIL EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIALS TRIM/ SOFFIT -BASIS OF DESIGN LP SMARTSIDE SMOOTH TRIM AND FASCIA CEDAR TEXTURE, COLOR: WHITE VERTICAL PANEL SIDING - BASIS OF DESIGN LP SMARTSIDE VERTICAL PANEL, COLOR: WHITE HORIZONTAL SIDING -BASIS OF DESIGN LP SMARTSIDE LAP SIDING CEDAR TEXTURE, COLOR: WHITE. ARCHITECTURAL ROOF SHINGLES, - COLOR: BLACK WHITE VINYL WINDOWS - BASIS OF DESIGN MI 3500 SINGLE HUNG RE: WINDOW SCHEDULE FOUNDATION WALL - CONCRETE PAINT, COLOR: TBD PREFINISHED GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS TO BE WHITE PORCH BRICK - COLOR: WHITE 1.RE: SHEET G001 FOR ADDITIONAL GENERAL NOTES THAT ARE APPLICABLE. 2.DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ARE TO THE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL, FACE OF MASONRY (FOM), FACE OF CONCRETE WALLS (FOC), FACE OF STUD, AND COLUMN GRID LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR INDICATED. 3.RE: THE WINDOW TYPES SHEET FOR ALL EXTERIOR WINDOW TYPES AND GLASS TYPES. 4.PROVIDE ALL BLOCKING AND POWER AS REQUIRED FOR EXTERIOR SIGNAGE. GENERAL NOTES EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS: EXT. ELEVATION KEYNOTES LEGEND MARK DESCRIPTION 1A 1B 6" LAP SIDING -SEE */**/***IN EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND BELOW VERTICAL PANEL SIDING -SEE **/***IN EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND BELOW 4D 1X6 TRIM BOARD -SEE ***IN EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND BELOW 7A CONCRETE FOUNDATION. PAINT WITH EXTERIOR CONCRETE PAINT. RE: EXT. FINISH LEGEND 5A 12"X24" LOUVERED GABLE VENT. FINISH TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL 6A LIGHT FIXTURE. RE: ELECTRICAL 9A PREFIN. ALUM. DECK RAILING. BASIS OF DESIGN WESTBURY ALUM. RAILING -TUSCANY SERIES 2A ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES 10A DECORATIVE INSULATED METAL PANEL OVERHEAD DOOR. RE: DOOR SCHEDULE 3A PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER. RE: EXT. FINISH LEGEND 4B 1X12 FASCIA BOARD -SEE ***IN EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND BELOW 4A 1X4 TRIM BOARD -SEE ***IN EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND BELOW 8A POST FOR DECK STRUCTURE. RE: STRUCTURAL 10B FIBERGLASS DOOR. RE: DOOR SCHEDULE 4C 1X12 TRIM BOARD -SEE ***IN EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND BELOW 3B PREFINISHED ALUMINUM DOWNSPOUT WITH SPLASH BLOCKS RE: EXT. FINISH LEGEND 8B TREATED WOOD DECK JOIST SYSTEM. RE: STRUCTURAL 10C WHITE VINYL WINDOW SYSTEM. BASIS OF DESIGN: MI 3500 SERIES 8C TREATED WOOD BEAM SYSTEM. RE: STRUCTURAL 8D VINYL FENCE PANEL. BASIS OF DESIGN POLYVINYL -TRIMAX II 8'-0" x 6'-0" 10D VINYL DOOR RE: DOOR SCHEDULE 11A DECORATIVE PVC CORBEL. RE: DETAILS 1C BRICK VENEER ISSUE DATE: COLLINS WEBB #: PROFESSIONAL SEAL COPYRIGHT © BY COLLINS WEBB ARCHITECTURE, LLC K J H G F E D C B A 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 K J H G F E D C B A REVISION DATES: 30 7 B S W M a r k e t S t . , L e e ' s S u m m i t , M i s s o u r i 6 4 0 6 3 | 8 1 6 . 2 4 9 . 2 2 7 0 | w w w . c o l l i n s a n d w e b b . c o m UN D E R R E V I E W 6/ 2 9 / 2 0 2 2 2 : 1 1 : 2 9 P M EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING A HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 29 JUNE 2022 21082 34 2 H a m e l R o a d , M e d i n a , M N 5 5 3 4 0 DE S I G N D E V E L O P M E N T A201 1/8" = 1'-0"G11 FRONT ELEVATION - BUILDING A (BUILIDNG B MIRR.) 1/8" = 1'-0"D11 BACK ELEVATION - BUILIDNG A (BUILDING B MIRR.) 1/8" = 1'-0"A11 SIDE ELEVATION LEFT - BUILDING A (BUILDING B SIM.) 1/8" = 1'-0"A6 SIDE ELEVATION RIGHT - BUILDING A (BUILDING B SIM.) ND E R R E V I E W ES I G N D E V E L O P M E N T Fi n a l P l a t A p p l i c a t i o n 1.RE: SHEET G001 FOR ADDITIONAL GENERAL NOTES THAT ARE APPLICABLE. 2.DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ARE TO THE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL, FACE OF MASONRY (FOM), FACE OF CONCRETE WALLS (FOC), FACE OF STUD, AND COLUMN GRID LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR INDICATED. 3.RE: THE WINDOW TYPES SHEET FOR ALL EXTERIOR WINDOW TYPES AND GLASS TYPES. 4.PROVIDE ALL BLOCKING AND POWER AS REQUIRED FOR EXTERIOR SIGNAGE. GENERAL NOTES EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS: 1ST FLOOR 100' -0" 2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8" ROOF (TOP OF 2ND FLOOR WALL) 119' -3" BASEMENT 90' -1 3/4" 9' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 1 0 ' - 1 7 / 8 " 9 ' - 1 1 / 8 " 11A 4B 2A 4A 1B 10C 9A 1C 1B 11A 4B 4A 1A 4C 2A 1B 4B 10C GRADE PER CIVIL 1ST FLOOR 100' -0" 2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8" ROOF (TOP OF 2ND FLOOR WALL) 119' -3" BASEMENT 90' -1 3/4" 9' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 1 0 ' - 1 7 / 8 " 9 ' - 1 1 / 8 " 10C 1A 4A 4B 8A 1C 10B 10A 6A 10B 1C 8A 1B 4B 4C 4A 1A 10C 4B 2A GRADE PER CIVIL 1ST FLOOR 100' -0" 2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8" ROOF (TOP OF 2ND FLOOR WALL) 119' -3" BASEMENT 90' -1 3/4" 9' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 1 0 ' - 1 7 / 8 " 9 ' - 1 1 / 8 " 6A 4A 1A 4A 2A 4B 1C 1A 4B 2A 11A 8C 8A 1B 9A 1C 4A 1A 4C 4B 2A GRADE PER CIVIL 1ST FLOOR 100' -0" 2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8" ROOF (TOP OF 2ND FLOOR WALL) 119' -3" BASEMENT 90' -1 3/4" 9' - 1 1 / 8 " 10 ' - 1 7 / 8 " 9' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 2A 4B 1A 4A 2A 6A 8A 1C 9A 4A 1A 4C 4B 8C 8A 1C 9A 11A GRADE PER CIVIL EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIALS TRIM/ SOFFIT -BASIS OF DESIGN LP SMARTSIDE SMOOTH TRIM AND FASCIA CEDAR TEXTURE, COLOR: WHITE VERTICAL PANEL SIDING - BASIS OF DESIGN LP SMARTSIDE VERTICAL PANEL, COLOR: WHITE HORIZONTAL SIDING -BASIS OF DESIGN LP SMARTSIDE LAP SIDING CEDAR TEXTURE, COLOR: WHITE. ARCHITECTURAL ROOF SHINGLES, - COLOR: BLACK WHITE VINYL WINDOWS - BASIS OF DESIGN MI 3500 SINGLE HUNG RE: WINDOW SCHEDULE FOUNDATION WALL - CONCRETE PAINT, COLOR: TBD PREFINISHED GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS TO BE WHITE PORCH BRICK - COLOR: WHITE EXT. ELEVATION KEYNOTES LEGEND MARK DESCRIPTION 1A 1B 6" LAP SIDING -SEE */**/***IN EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND BELOW VERTICAL PANEL SIDING -SEE **/***IN EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND BELOW 4D 1X6 TRIM BOARD -SEE ***IN EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND BELOW 7A CONCRETE FOUNDATION. PAINT WITH EXTERIOR CONCRETE PAINT. RE: EXT. FINISH LEGEND 5A 12"X24" LOUVERED GABLE VENT. FINISH TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL 6A LIGHT FIXTURE. RE: ELECTRICAL 9A PREFIN. ALUM. DECK RAILING. BASIS OF DESIGN WESTBURY ALUM. RAILING -TUSCANY SERIES 2A ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES 10A DECORATIVE INSULATED METAL PANEL OVERHEAD DOOR. RE: DOOR SCHEDULE 3A PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER. RE: EXT. FINISH LEGEND 4B 1X12 FASCIA BOARD -SEE ***IN EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND BELOW 4A 1X4 TRIM BOARD -SEE ***IN EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND BELOW 8A POST FOR DECK STRUCTURE. RE: STRUCTURAL 10B FIBERGLASS DOOR. RE: DOOR SCHEDULE 4C 1X12 TRIM BOARD -SEE ***IN EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND BELOW 3B PREFINISHED ALUMINUM DOWNSPOUT WITH SPLASH BLOCKS RE: EXT. FINISH LEGEND 8B TREATED WOOD DECK JOIST SYSTEM. RE: STRUCTURAL 10C WHITE VINYL WINDOW SYSTEM. BASIS OF DESIGN: MI 3500 SERIES 8C TREATED WOOD BEAM SYSTEM. RE: STRUCTURAL 8D VINYL FENCE PANEL. BASIS OF DESIGN POLYVINYL -TRIMAX II 8'-0" x 6'-0" 10D VINYL DOOR RE: DOOR SCHEDULE 11A DECORATIVE PVC CORBEL. RE: DETAILS 1C BRICK VENEER ISSUE DATE: COLLINS WEBB #: PROFESSIONAL SEAL COPYRIGHT © BY COLLINS WEBB ARCHITECTURE, LLC K J H G F E D C B A 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 K J H G F E D C B A REVISION DATES: 30 7 B S W M a r k e t S t . , L e e ' s S u m m i t , M i s s o u r i 6 4 0 6 3 | 8 1 6 . 2 4 9 . 2 2 7 0 | w w w . c o l l i n s a n d w e b b . c o m UN D E R R E V I E W 6/ 2 9 / 2 0 2 2 2 : 1 1 : 5 6 P M EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING C HA M E L T O W N H O M E S 29 JUNE 2022 21082 34 2 H a m e l R o a d , M e d i n a , M N 5 5 3 4 0 DE S I G N D E V E L O P M E N T A202 1/8" = 1'-0"G10 FRONT ELEVATION - BUILDING C 1/8" = 1'-0"D10 BACK ELEVATION - BUILDING C 1/8" = 1'-0"A10 SIDE ELEVATION LEFT - BUILDING C 1/8" = 1'-0"A5 SIDE ELEVATION RIGHT - BUILDING C ND E R R E V I E W ES I G N D E V E L O P M E N T Fi n a l P l a t A p p l i c a t i o n