HomeMy Public PortalAboutAgenda_CCMeeting_03212017 .
•41T400'
ii, )
eki
AGENDA1
Iona City Council Regular Meeting
March 21, 2017 — 7:00 p.m.
Iona City Hall — 3548 North Main Street
1. WELCOME
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGANCE
4. CONSENT AGENDA
a. Minutes
b. Financial and Expense Reports
5. ITEMS OF BUSINESS
a. Public Hearings
i. Preliminary Plat Application for the Northwest Corner of Rockwood
Ave. and Dayton St. — Scott Steele — Public Hearing — 7:15 p.m.
Amendment of Title 11, Chapter 11, Section 6 of the City Code
Relative to the Construction of Accessory Buildings—Public Hearing
b. City Wide Survey Review—Ted Hendricks
c. Country Haven Estates
d. Approval of Liquidation of Surplus Vehicles
e. Library Improvement Proposal
f. Water System Discussion
g. Annual Easter Egg Hunt
h. Arbor Day& Spring Clean Up
i. Iona Days
j. Staff Reports
6. ADJORNMENT
' The Idaho Open Meeting Act prohibits Council deliberation or a decision on matters that are not specifically listed
on the Agenda. Persons wishing to items placed on the Agenda should contact the City Clerk no later than the
Tuesday Prior to the next meeting. Persons needing special accommodations to participate in the meeting should
contact the City Clerk no later than 1:00 p.m.on the day prior to the meeting.
that the questions need to elicit more than a basic yes or no answer. He
provided a handout of his proposed revisions for the Council's review.
The Council discussed the suggested revisions provided by Council Member Garren, and
provided feedback to Mr. Hendricks on how they would like to see the questions designed.
Overall, the Council liked the revisions, but encouraged simplicity and would like to see as many
yes or no questions as possible.
Mr. Hendricks will work with Mayor Andersen and Clerk Roberts on the revisions and provide
an updated version for the Council's review.
Meeting adjourned 7:28 p.m.
COUNCIL APPROVED: April 18th , 2017 ,1 0-4h 1A
Brad Andersen, Mayor
AT ST:
Shara Roberts, City Clerk
91410
the gross replacement value, you deduct deprecation
and any outstanding bond principal which gives you a net system value. From the net system
value, you divide it by the number of users the system can service and the resulting figure
produces the dollar value which you can charge as a water connection fee. The Idaho Supreme
Court has made it very clear that you cannot include projected or future expansion into that
calculation.
In regards to including the value of existing water rights, the Idaho Supreme Court has not
(11110 historically addressed the legality of including this component in the methodology. However,
when a user connects to a city's water system he or she receives the benefit of that water right.
Attorney Storer pointed out that water rights are very valuable assets which do not depreciate
1