HomeMy Public PortalAbout10) 7F Approval of Plans for FY 2016-17 Pavement Rehabilitation ProjectAGENDA
ITEM 7.F.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 2, 2016
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Bryan Cook, City Manager
Via: Michael D. Forbes, Community Development Director ~
By: Ali Cayir, PE , City Engineer
Okan Demirci, Project Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR (FY)
2016-17 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT (CIP NO. P13-02)
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council is requested to:
1. Approve plans and specifications for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2016-17 Pavement
Rehabilitation Project, Capital Improvement Program (C IP) No. P13-02 , and
authorize staff to advertise the project for bids; and
2. Approve the Environmental Assessment for the project by finding the project
categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines
pertaining to minor alterations to existing public facilities.
BACKGROUND:
1. In 2013, the City completed a citywide Pavement Management Program (PMP) report.
The report presented findings and recommendations from a pavement cond ition
survey of the City's street network, including pavement condition summaries,
preservation and repair activities, and projected budgets for those activities.
2. In June 2016, the City Council approved the FY 2016-17 City Budget. The budget
includes an allocation of $1 .5 million of Measure R transportation funds for CIP No.
P13-02 for pavement rehabilitation pursuant to the findings and recommendations of
the PMP.
City Council
August 2, 2016
Page 2
ANALYSIS:
Purpose of the PMP
Well-maintained streets are integral to the general health, quality of life, and economic
stability of the City. Maintaining adequate streets and sidewalks also has a positive impact
on the overall "image" that the City projects to residents, visitors, and neighboring
communities. Streets require periodic repair and preventive maintenance in order to
maintain their life expectancy. Failure to conduct timely preventative maintenance
significantly shortens a street's life and subsequently requires costly street reconstruction.
The PMP includes recommendations for maintaining the City's streets, including
pavement condition summaries, preservation and repair activities, and projected budgets.
The recommendations in the PMP are for planning purposes only and are not intended
to rep lace sound engineering judgement for actual construction. The PMP is used as the
basis for making strategic decisions to plan future work effectively and cost efficiently.
The City Engineer conducts field observations to update and supplement the information
in the PMP report. These observations are used to develop projects with an efficient
cosUbenefit ratio based on field conditions, other relevant projects, budget availability,
and various oth er factors that may exist at th e time.
Analysis Methodology
The PMP was developed based upon a fie ld inspection of pavement conditions on all 71
miles of streets in Temple City, using Federal guidelines, to create a condition inventory
of all streets. Based on the inspection, a Pavement Condition Index (PC I) was calculated
to reflect the overall pavement cond itions of each street segment. The PCI system is the
national standard rating mechanism used to describe the pavement condition. It uses a
scale ranging from 0 to 100 to rate the condition of paved surfaces. Table 1 below shows
the PCI range for different pavement conditions. Attachment "A" includes photos
illustrating the different conditions.
Tabl 1 PCI R e anges o fP avemen t C dT ns on 110
Pavement Condition PCIRange
Excellent 86-100
Very Good 71 -85
Good 56-70
Fair 41 -55
Poor 26-40
Very Poor 11-25
Failed 0-10
A recently paved street segment has a PC I at, or close to , 100. As the pavement
deteriorates its PCI gradually decreases. Once it drops to a PCI of 55 ("fa ir"), its condition
is considered critica l. Unless some form of treatment is done, the pavement condition will
City Council
August 2, 2016
Page 3
rapidly deteriorate, until it becomes "poor" and "fa iled", with a substantially increased
reconstruction cost.
Conditions Summary
Temple City streets have an overall PCI of 62 , indicative of a "good" condition rating. The
rating is achieved by averaging the PCI rating for arterial, collector, and residential streets,
with arterial and collector streets given more weight in calculating the average. The City
achieved a PCI of 77 ("very good") on arterial streets, 59 ("good") on collector streets,
and 54 ("fair") on residential streets. The majority of the streets in the City have a PCI at
or above the critical PCI of 55, which can be rehabilitated with less expensive methods
such as slurry seal or grind and overlay. A minority of streets in the city fall under the
"failed" and "poor" PCI levels, requiring more expensive rehabilitation methods.
Work Program Approach
Preventative maintenance on streets with PCI ratings above 55 must be considered in
combination with the more extensive rehabilitation of failing streets to realize the
maximum benefit and reduce long term costs. Prioritizing preventive maintenance on
street segments at or above the critical PCI of 55 extends th e life expectancy of those
streets and reduces rehabilitation costs in the long run. Prioritizing expensive
reconstruction work on the small number of "poor" to "failed" streets would reduce funding
for preventive maintenance on "fair" to "excellent" streets. Once a street segment reaches
a PCI of 55 , the pavement deteriorates at a faster rate. As such , th is approach would
lead to the increasingly rapid deterioration of those streets and a significant drop in the
City's overall PC I. Prioritizing preventive maintenance has been used successfully since
2014 to complete pavement rehabilitation in conjunction with other CIPs such as the Safe
Routes to School and Bicycle Transportation Account projects. A list of all street
rehabilitation completed since 2014 is attached as Attachment "B".
Streets Included for FY 2016-17
Following the approach of prioritizing preventive maintenance, the FY 2016-17 PMP
mainly includes slurry seal resurfacing. Based on the budget allocation and recent bids
received for similar work, the streets and quantities were selected as shown in Attachment
"C". The proposed project includes slurry seal for approximately two million squa re feet of
pavement, and also includes localized dig-out and reconstruction as needed for small areas
where more extensive rehabilitation is needed (e .g. major potholes , depressions, etc.).
The final streets and quantities may be increased or decreased based on actual bids
received . The bid schedule is based on quantities and unit bid prices which allows the City
to make quantity adjustments and pay the same unit bid prices within plus or minus 25
percent of the total value. It is not uncommon for bids to come in at plus or minus 20 percent
of the estimated budget. Dependi ng upon the low bid amount received, the streets will be
adjusted accordingly to stay within the budget. Any such adjustments to stay within the
budget would be made based on engineering review and field conditions.
City Council
August 2, 2016
Page4
Environmental Review
This project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA pursuant to Section 15301
(Existing Facilities) of the State CEQA Guidelines pertaining to minor alterations to
existing public faci lities.
CITY STRATEGIC GOALS:
The FY 2016-17 Pavement Rehabilitation Project furthers the City Strategic Goals of Public
Health and Safety, Quality of Life, Sustainable Infrastructure, and Economic Development.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The approved FY 2016-17 City Budget includes an allocation of $1.5 million of MeasureR
transportation funds for CIP No. P13-02 for pavement rehabilitation pursuant to the PMP.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Photos illustrating pavement conditions and PCI
B. PMP street rehabilitation progress since 2014
C. List of streets to be rehabilitated
ATTACHMENT A
Photos Illustrating Pavement Conditions and PCI
A roadway with a PCI of 1 00
Good
A roadway with a PCI of 70
A roadway with a PCI of 25
A roadway with a PCI of 83
A roadway with a PCI of 50
A roadway with a PCI of 1 0
~--~ ~--~-~~-~ ~ -----------------
ATTACHMENT 8
Pavement Management Program Progress Since 2014
To date, the following street pavement improvements have been completed:
2015 BTA (Bicycle Transportation Account) Slurry (Approx. total area=729,000 sf):
• Longden Ave from Burton Ave to Rosemead Bl
• Golden West Ave from Garibaldi Ave to Las Tunas Dr
• Olive Ave from Rosemead Bl toE of Arden Dr
• Lemon Ave from Temple City Bl to Golden West Ave
• Olive from Arden to El Monte Ave
• Longden from TC Blvd to East City Limits
• Golden West from Lemon to Garibaldi
2015 BTA (Bicycle Transportation Account) Cold mill and Overlay (ARHM-Rubberized
Asphalt) (Approx. total area=383,000 sf):
• El Monte Ave-Las Tunas Dr to Lower Azusa Rd
• Arden Or-Olive Ave to Lower Azusa Rd
2014 SR2S (Safe Routes To School) Slurry (Approx. total area=550,000 sf):
• Cloverly Ave from Broadway to Blackley St
• Flaherty St from Cloverly Ave to Primrose Ave
• Fratus Drive from Pentland St to La Rosa Dr
• La Rosa Drive from Fratus Dr to Alessandro Ave
• Lemon from Oak to Temple City Blvd
• Longden Ave from Rosemead Blvd to Temple City Blvd
• Oak Avenue from Camino Real to Longden
• Pentland St from Encinita Ave to Alessandro Ave
• Primrose from Longden Ave to Garibaldi Ave
• Temple City Blvd from Camino Real Ave to Lemon Ave
• Wendon St from Cloverly Ave to Primrose Ave
2014 SR2S (Safe Routes To School) Cold mill and Overlay (ARAM-Rubberized Asphalt)
(Approx. total area=48.000 sf):
• Daleview Ave from Freer St to Grand Ave
Also, Rosemead Boulevard pavement was improved with new rubberized asphalt pavement
as part of the Rosemead Bl Construction Project. The new asphalt pavement work was
covered by the Rosemead Bl construction funds, which included combination of outside
Federal and State and local match funding.
The street pavement work completed under SR2S, BTA, and Rosemead Bl Projects covers
approximately 2.3 million square feet (sf) of pavement area, which represents approximately
15% of the City's total 13.8 million sf pavement surface area. The pavement improvements
covered approximately 2.3 million sf included street surface (1 ,050,000 sf of Cold mill and
Overlay and 1 ,280,000 sf of Slurry Seal).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT C
Streets to be Resurfaced for FY 16-17
Street Name From To
BALDWIN AVENUE LIVE OAK AVENUE 190 N/0 LOWER AZUSA ROAD
BARELA AVENUE WOOLLEY STREET CRAIGLEE STREET
BLACKLEY STREET PARMERTON AVENUE McCULLOCH AVENUE
BROADWAY ENCINITA AVENUE TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD
BROADWAY ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD ENCINITA AVENUE
BROADWAY WEST CITY LIMIT ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD
CALLITA STREET 501 W/0 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD
CAMELLIA AVENUE CUL-DE-SAC GARIBALDI AVENUE
CAMINO REAL OAK AVENUE TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD
CLOVERLY AVENUE LIVE OAK AVENUE BROADWAY
CLOVERLY AVENUE WENDON STREET FLAHERTY STREET
CRAIGLEE STREET BARELA AVENUE EAST END
CRAIGLEE STREET TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD BARELA AVENUE
DAINES DRIVE BALDWIN AVENUE HALIFAX ROAD
DAINES DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD
DAINES DRIVE HALIFAX ROAD El. MONTE AVENUE
DAINES DRIVE McCULLOCH AVENUE WELLAND AVENUE
DAINES DRIVE WELLAND AVENU E SANTA ANITA AVENUE
DANESWOOD DRIVE PARMERTON AVENUE McCULLOCH AVENUE
ELLIS LANE 60 S/0 LOWER AZUSA ROAD TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD
ELM AVENUE MUSCATEL. AVENU E RENO AVENUE
EMPEROR AVENUE OAK AVENUE CUL-DE-SAC
ESTRELLA AVENUE SALTER AVENUE EAST CITY LIMIT
FLAHERTY STREET GOLDEN WEST AVENUE ROWLAND AVENUE
FREER STREET ARCADIA WASH SANTA ANITA AVENUE
FREER STREET ARDEN DRIVE HALIFAX ROAD
FREER STREET EL MONTE AVENUE ARCADIA WASH
FREER STREET HALIFAX ROAD EL MONTE AVENUE
GRACEWOOD AVENUE LIVE OAK AVENUE 885 NORTH OF DAINES DRIVE
GREEN STREET BALDWIN AVENUE CUL-DE-SAC
HART AVENUE HERMOSA DRIVE LAS TUNAS DRIVE
HECLA STREET CUL-DE-SAC HILTON AVENUE
HERMOSA DRIVE BURTON AVENUE MUSCATEL AVENUE
HERMOSA DRIVE MUSCATEL AVENUE ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD
HERMOSA DRIVE ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD SULTANA AVENUE
HERMOSA DRIVE SULTANA AVENUE ENCINITA AVENUE
HILTON AVENUE CUL-DE-SAC OLIVE STREET
JA YLEE DRIVE LOMA AVENUE CUL-DE-SAC
LIVE OAK AVENUE 760 E/0 BALDWIN AVENUE GLICKMAN AVENUE
LI VE OAK AVENUE BALDWIN AVENUE 760 E/0 BALDWIN AVENUE
LIVE OAK AVENUE ENCINITA AVENUE TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD
LIVE OAK AVENUE GLICKMAN AVENUE EAST CITY LIMIT
Street Name From To
LIVE OAK AVENUE TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD BALDWIN AVENUE
LOMAAVENUE EMPEROR AVENUE WOOLLEY STREET
McCLINTOCK AVENUE GRAND AVENUE FAIRVIEW AVENUE
MILLER DRIVE LOWER AZUSA ROAD SOUTH END
NADINE STREET CUL-DE-SAC TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD
NOEL DRIVE NORTH END BROADWAY
OAK AVENUE LONGDEN AVENUE GARIBALDI AVENUE
PARMERTON AVENUE DAINES DRIVE BLACKLEY STREET
PARMERTON AVENUE DANESWOOD DRIVE DAINES DRIVE
PERSIMMON AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT DAINES DRIVE
RENO AVENUE GARIBALDI AVENUE HERMOSA AVENUE
RENO AVENUE HERMOSA AVENUE ELM AVENUE
RENO AVENUE LONGDEN AVENUE GARIBALDI AVENUE
ROWLAND AVENUE FLAHERTY STREET WENDON AVENUE
SALTER AVENUE ESTRELLA AVENUE LONGDEN AVENUE
SPARKLED STREET CAMELLIA AVENUE KAUFFMAN AVENUE
SPARKLED STREET TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD CAMELLIA AVENUE
SULTANA AVENUE HERMOSA DRIVE LAS TUNAS DRIVE
VAL STREET BARELA AVENUE GOLDEN WEST AVENUE
VAL STREET GOLDEN WEST AVENUE EAST CITY LIMIT
VAL STREET TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD BARELA AVENUE
WENDON STREET GOLDEN WEST AVENUE ROWLAND AVENUE
LIVE OAK AVENUE BALDWIN AVENUE 760 E/0 BALDWIN AVENUE
LIVE OAK AVENUE ENCINITA AVENUE TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD
LIVE OAK AVENUE GLICKMAN AVENUE EAST CITY LIMIT
LIVE OAK AVENUE TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD BALDWIN AVENUE
LOMAAVENUE EMPEROR AVENUE WOOLLEY STREET
McCLINTOCK AVENUE GRAND AVENUE FAIRVIEW AVENUE
MILLER DRIVE LOWER AZUSA ROAD SOUTH END
NADINE STREET CUL-DE-SAC TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD
NOEL DRIVE NORTH END BROADWAY
OAK AVENUE LONGDEN AVENUE GARIBALDI AVENUE
PARMERTON AVENUE DAINES DRIVE BLACKLEY STREET
PARMERTON AVENUE DANESWOOD DRIVE DAINES DRIVE
PERSIMMON AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT DAINES DRIVE
RENO AVENUE GARIBALDI AVENUE HERMOSA AVENUE