HomeMy Public PortalAbout11-09-2022 Planning Commission Packet POSTED AT CITY HALL: November 4, 2022
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 2022
7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL (2052 County Road 24)
1. Call to Order
2. Changes to Agenda
3. Introduction of Planning Commissioners
4. Update from City Council proceedings
5. Representative at next City Council meeting
6. Planning Department Report
7. Public Hearing – Meander Park and Boardwalk – Meander Rd, East of
Arrowhead Dr – Medina Ventures – PUD General Plan and Preliminary
Plat for commercial development including event venue, daycare,
restaurant and retail (PID 0211823330003)
8. BAPS Minneapolis Medina – 1400 Hamel Rd – Amended Site Plan
Review for construction of religious/assembly building (PID
1111823230003)
9. Approval October 11, 2022 Planning Commission Minutes
10. Adjourn
Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 October 18, 2022
City Council Meeting
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: October 13, 2022
MEETING: October 18, 2022 City Council
SUBJECT: Planning Department Updates
Land Use Application Review
A) Pioneer Highlands Preliminary Plat – Onyx Performance Investment LLC has requested
approval of a 4-lot rural subdivision located on approximately 67 acres south of Pioneer Trail,
east of Willow Drive. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the September 13
meeting and following the hearing recommended approval. The Council reviewed on October
4 and directed staff to prepare a resolution of approval, which will be presented at the October
18 meeting.
B) Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial – Loram and Scannell have submitted materials for the
City to prepare an EAW for a warehouse/industrial development east of Arrowhead Drive,
south of Highway 55, to the south of Loram’s existing facility. The council approved the
findings of fact and made a negative declaration on the need for an EIS at the April 5 meeting.
Staff will route the record of decision as required. The applicant has now also applied for
preliminary plat and site plan review approval for construction of approximately 398,000 s.f. of
office warehouse on three lots. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their August
10 and October 11 meetings and recommended approval on a 4-2 vote. Staff intends to present
the wetland application to council on October 18 or November 1.
C) Cates Ranch/Willow Drive Warehouse Industrial – Comprehensive Plan Amendment–
Oppidan has submitted a concept plan review for a 310,000 square foot warehouse/office
development east of Willow Drive, north of Chippewa Road. The applicant is requesting
feedback prior to proceeding with full design of their project. The Planning Commission
reviewed and provided comments on October 11. Staff intends to present to Council on
October 18.
D) Meander Park and Boardwalk – Meander Rd, east of Arrowhead Dr – Medina Ventures had
requested PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat approval for a development to include four
residential units north of Meander Rd, and commercial uses south of Meander Rd including a
venue, restaurant, daycare, and speculative retail space. Staff is reviewing materials and will
schedule for a public hearing when complete, potentially at the November 9 meeting.
E) Knappenberger Rearrangement and Easement Vacation – Gail Knappenberger has requested
approval of a lot line rearrangement between two properties in common ownership. The
applicant also requests to vacate easements adjacent to the relocated property line and proposes
to grant replacement easements next to the new line. Staff is reviewing the information and has
scheduled a hearing for the October 18 Council meeting. The rearrangement is not yet ready for
review, so staff will request that the Council continue the hearing to November 1.
F) Hamel Legion Park Grandstand – The Hamel Athletic Club has requested a site plan review
for construction of a grandstand at the Paul Fortin Field in Hamel Legion Park. City Council
approved the CUP and authorized construction on October 4. Staff will be working on the fence
installation and is discussing how to proceed with the discussions on improving parking.
MEMORANDUM
Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 October 18, 2022
City Council Meeting
G) Elam Accessory Structure CUP – 1582 Homestead Tr. – Tim and Megan Elam have requested
a conditional use permit for construction of a barn/storage building with a footprint of
approximately 10,000 s.f. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the September 13
meeting and following the hearing recommended approval. Council adopted a resolution of
approval on October 4. The project will now be closed.
H) Target/Medina Clydesdale Marketplace PUD Amendment – 300 Clydesdale Tr – Target has
requested an amendment to the Medina Clydesdale Marketplace Planned Unit Development to
allow additional signage for their Drive-Up services. The Planning Commission held a public
hearing at the September 13 meeting and following the hearing recommended approval.
Council adopted the ordinance amending the PUD on October 4. The project will now be
closed.
I) Adam’s Pest Control Final Plat – Jan Har LLC has requested final plat approval for a two lot
subdivision for development of an office north of Hwy 55 and west of Willow Drive. The
property owner to the east of the site has not agreed to provide right-of-way, so the applicant
proposes access directly to Highway 55. Council granted final approval at the September 20
meeting. Staff will work with the applicant on conditions of approval before construction.
J) 500 Hamel Road Apartment Concept Plan – Medina Apartments LLC has requested review of
a concept plan review for development of a 97-unit apartment building at 500 Hamel Rd. The
Planning Commission held a public hearing at their August 10 meeting and Council provided
comments on August 16. The developer met with neighbors on September 12 and the parties
have indicated that they will meet again to discuss the project.
K) Hamel Townhomes Final Plat – 342 Hamel Rd – Hamel Townhomes, LLC has requested final
plat approval for a 30-unit townhome development. The Council granted final plat approval on
August 16. Staff will work with the applicant to finalize documents prior to beginning of
construction.
L) Ditter Heating and Cooling Site Plan Review – 820 Tower Drive – Ditter Heating and Cooling
has requested a Site Plan Review for an approximately 5,000 square foot addition to its building.
The application is incomplete for review and will be scheduled for a hearing when complete.
M) Adam’s Pest Control Site Plan Review, Pre Plat, Rezoning – Pioneer Trail Preserve – These
projects have been preliminarily approved and the City is awaiting final plat application.
N) BAPS Site Plan, Johnson ADU CUP, St. Peter and Paul Cemetery – The City Council has
adopted resolutions approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants with the
conditions of approval in order to complete the projects.
Other Projects
A) Uptown Hamel Analysis – staff hosted a booth a Celebration Day for public engagement on the
Uptown Hamel analysis. WSB has also created a short community survey on Hamel, which is
currently being hosted online.
B) Hackamore Road – staff is in discussion with property owners related to potential easement
acquisition. Jim Stremel will provide an update to Council on progress on design and permitting
at the October 18 worksession.
C) Litigation – Staff spent significant time preparing for trial and went to court on Monday.
Additional settlement discussions occurred prior to the start of trial, and staff intends to
discuss with Council in closed session on October 18.
D) Minnehaha Creek TAC – I attended a Technical Advisory Committee meeting related to
Minnehaha Creek’s Land and Water Partnership program.
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jason Nelson, Director of Public Safety
DATE: October 13, 2022
RE: Department Updates
These past two weeks we have been busy interviewing candidates for both Police and Community
Service Officer openings. We have been progressing well within the processes and have currently
given out two background packets to potential Community Service Officers who are both looking for
part time work. Investigator Scharf is currently conducting their pre-employment backgrounds. On
October 13, I will conduct two Chief’s interviews with finalists for the police officer position and from
there will offer a conditional job offer pending the passing of the pre-employment background,
psychological, physical, and council approval.
Our training staff is working on joint training with the city of Corcoran at the new park property off
Chippewa. This will be scenario-based training with the two departments. We normally do this joint
training in the summer but have not done so the past two summers due to COVID and staffing issues.
Staff is also preparing to finish up yearly mandated firearms training in November.
I will be attending the International Chief’s of Police Conference in Dallas, Texas from October 14-19.
I am looking forward to collaborating with chiefs from around the world at this event in hopes to bring
back ideas that will benefit out department and the citizens of Medina.
Patrol:
The following are updates of Patrol Officers between September 28 and October 11, 2022: Officers
issued 23 citations and 45 warnings for various traffic offenses, responded to 4 property damage
accidents, 3 personal injury accidents, 8 medicals, 5 suspicious calls, 5 traffic complaints, 7 assists to
other agencies, 9 business/residential alarms, and 4 welfare checks.
On 09/29/2022 at 1246 hours officer was dispatched to an interrupted theft in the 800 block of
Highway 55. Victim reported walking back to his truck and finding someone taking items out of his
truck to include wiring and a gas can. Victim confronted the suspect who dropped the items and left in
a pickup. Victim was able to obtain a license plate on the suspect’s vehicle. The case has been
forwarded to investigations for follow up.
On 09/29/2022 officers were dispatched to a welfare check in the 500 block of Clydesdale Circle.
Person called 911 reporting they believed their mother was possibly suicidal after an argument and
that she had left in a white SUV from the residence. Upon arrival officers located the mother sitting in
the vehicle in the driveway. She reported she was sitting in the car listening to music to calm down
after the argument with her juvenile daughter. Officers went inside the residence and spoke with all
parties. Tensions had calmed down and both parties agreed to go to bed for the night.
On 09/30/2022 officer took a forgery report by phone. Victim reported someone had called the post
office and requested their mail be forwarded to another address which the victim had not done. Victim
had already contacted the post office and reported the incident. No known financial loss at this time.
On 09/30/2022 at 1745 hours officers were dispatched to a suspected impaired driver in the drive thru
at McDonalds. Caller reported being nearly run over in the parking lot by a female who was believed
to be intoxicated. Upon arrival officers located the female parked at the drive thru window. Officers
were able to make contact and found the female to be extremely intoxicated. She was arrested for
DWI and later submitted to a breath test which showed a BAC of .25. She was transported to
Hennepin County Jail.
On 10/03/2022 officer was dispatched to a threat report at a residence on Wichita Trail. Victim
reported their estranged father sending unwanted text messages which victim interpreted as
threatening. The officer was provided a copy of the video and after review it was determined no crime
had been committed. Victim was advised of options as to obtaining either an order for protection or
harassment order through Hennepin Courts.
On 10/03/2022 officer was dispatched to a reported chemical smell in the area of the 3100 block of
Lakeshore Avenue. Loretto Fire Department was also paged to the area to investigate. Upon arrival it
was determined that a neighbor had their concrete driveway sealed which was putting off the odor.
On 10/05/2022 officer was dispatched to a report of mail theft in the 3800 block of Linden Drive.
Victim reported placing two checks in the outgoing mail of her mailbox that morning. When the mail
person arrived to collect, she was advised there was no mail in the mailbox. The victim had already
contacted the bank to cancel the checks.
On 10/07/2022 officer was dispatched to the area of Hamel Road and County Road 19 on a report of a
gas spill. Driver advised they were driving along the roadway when their gas tank on their vehicle had
fallen loose and has spilled gasoline on the roadway. Loretto Fire Department responded and was able
to contain the spill. The vehicle was towed from the scene.
On 10/08/2022 officers conducted extra enforcement in the area of the Automotorplex event. Several
citations were issued for excessive speed in the area including 85 in a 55 zone, 87 in a 55 zone, 82 in
55 zone, 99 in 55 zone (clocked 109/55).
On 10/09/2022 at 0900 hours officer was dispatched to a reported mental health problem at Holiday,
200 Highway 55. Person called 911 reporting he was suicidal and needed help. Upon arrival the
officer made contact with the individual who was well known to our agency and known to have mental
health issues. The party voluntarily agreed to go to the hospital to be evaluated and was transported by
North ambulance.
On 10/10/2022 officers were dispatched to a reported slumper in the 500 block of Highway 55.
Homeowner reported an unknown person parked in the driveway for the past three hours and appeared
incoherent. Officers arrived and found the male possibly suffering from a diabetic issue. North
ambulance arrived and assumed care of the individual. After administering treatment, the individual
came around and eventually refused transport to the hospital.
On 10/10/2022 officer was dispatched to an injured squirrel in the roadway in front of the police
department. Upon investigation the officer located a deceased squirrel in the roadway. The squirrel
was removed.
On 10/11/2022 officer responded to a theft from auto report at Target. Victim reported doing
landscaping on the Target property. Shortly after 1100 victim began receiving notification on his
phone that his cards were suspected of being used fraudulently. Victim found that his wallet had been
taken from his unlocked work truck that was parked in the Target parking lot within the past few
hours. The cards were used to purchase gift cards at a Plymouth Target store. The case will be
forwarded to investigations for follow up.
Investigations:
Returned to work the week of the 3rd following a great surgery recovery.
Received a child protection report, investigation on-going.
Received two different theft reports, one resulted in a loss of $2,600, the other with fraudulent credit
card use, unrelated. Both investigations on-going.
On October 12th and 13th, I attended the annual Towards Zero Death’s traffic seminar in St. Cloud,
attending a total of 5 courses over two days. The courses ranged from new vehicle technology/safety
risks for first responders, impacts of speeding, human trafficking and exploitation, crash
reconstruction, and investigating alcohol overservice. Additionally, I re-certified as a Drug
Recognition Evaluator (DRE) to keep that certification up to date.
I have nearly completed two CSO backgrounds, with the anticipated completion date being early next
week.
There are currently 7 cases assigned to investigations.
1
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director
DATE: October 13, 2022
MEETING: October 18, 2022
SUBJECT: Public Works Update
STREETS
• The Deerhill Road project is complete.
• The Public Works crew has been busy patching around manholes, catch basins
and valves this week to prepare for snow plowing season.
• The tree trimming in the Foxberry Farms neighborhood is complete the crew
spent several days clearing over-hanging trees.
• We are in the process of installing signage on Chippewa Road and will make the
traffic change at Mohawk and Chippewa soon.
WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER
• The bids are back for the water treatment plant media replacement. They came
back higher than expected because of an added addendum to dispose of the
greensand that may contain high radium levels. Testing will be done to see
exactly what we are dealing with as we get closer to the project.
• Public Works completed our fall flushing. This is a large undertaking and took
three staff members three weeks to complete.
PARKS/TRAILS
• The grandstand has been occupying some of my time in the past week. HAC
would like to proceed but we have permits and contracts to get in place prior to
work being done. City Attorney Dave Anderson and I will be working with the
groups to put together a purchasing contract to keep the purchase of the
grandstand within our guidelines.
• Public Works staff will be working with our contractor as well as doing work
ourselves to clean up the new park site on Chippewa Road prior to the police and
fire training that will be done. Our contractor will seal the well and we will also
be removing the septic tanks in the future.
MISC
• Lisa and I continue to work with WSB on Medina’s MS4 reauthorization permit
as required by the MPCA. It has been a long process to evaluate and update all
MEMORANDUM
2
the necessary minimum control measures. We will present a revised plan and
ordinances to Council within the next couple month.
• We are in the middle of overhauling the safety manual to combine and eliminate
the handbook (so there is one document to maintain). The manual will continue
to align with our insurance and personnel policy requirements, as well as OSHA
mandates.
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 1 of 15 November 9, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat Planning Commission Meeting
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: November 3, 2022
MEETING: November 9, 2022 Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Public Hearing – Medina Ventures – Medina Park and Boardwalk -
1472 Highway 55 (PID 0211823330003) – PUD General Plan; Pre-Plat
Summary of Request
Medina Ventures has approval of a PUD General Plan and
preliminary plat for a development including commercial uses
and four townhome/lodging units located along Meander Road
east of Arrowhead Drive, west of Fields of Medina West.
The City provided comments on a PUD Concept Plan earlier this
year. Excerpts from these discussions are attached for reference.
The concept plan had shown similar commercial uses south of
Meander Road, with the daycare building being further from
Meander. The concept had proposed a three-unit building north of Meander Road.
The subject site is over 18 acres in size, but the majority of the property is within the large
wetland located west and north of the site. The property north of Meander is vacant and contains
approximately 1.0 net acre, and the property south of Meander Road is approximately 4.9 net
acres and includes a barn structure and with a grove of trees around the building. An aerial of
the subject site and surrounding land can be found on the following page.
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
The subject property is bisected by Meander Road and the planned
land use and zoning differs on each side of the roadway. The
property north of Meander Road is guided for Low Density
Residential (LDR) development, anticipating a density of
2-3 units/net acre. This property is zoned Rural Residential-Urban
Reserve (RR-UR), which is a temporary zoning for rural property
until developed.
The purpose of the R1 zoning district is to be the default zoning for development within the LDR
land use. The R2 zoning district is also an alternative which the City has the discretion to apply
to LDR property to allow smaller lots or twinhomes to cluster homes to preserve natural areas
and open spaces. The applicant proposes a Planned Unit Development (PUD), which allows an
applicant to request flexibility from the standard regulations to support a development which
better achieves City objectives. The City has a good deal of discretion whether to approve a
PUD as an alternative to standard zoning.
Proposed Uses: Event Venue
Restaurant
Day Care
9,600 s.f. retail
4 lodging/townhomes
Gross Site Area: 18 acres
Net Site Area: 4.9 acre commercial
1.5 acre residential
Land Use (north): LDR
Current Zoning (north): RR-UR
Land Use (south): Commercial
Current Zoning (south): CH
Proposed Zoning: PUD
MEMORANDUM
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 2 of 15 November 9, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat Planning Commission Meeting
The property south of Meander Road is designated as Commercial (C) and zoned Commercial-
Highway (CH), anticipating retail and office development.
Surrounding land uses include Fields of Medina (LDR) to the northeast and property guided for
future LDR development to the north. Property to the southeast is guided for future Commercial
development and currently farmed. Highway 55 is located to the south and a large wetland to the
west. The wetland extends onto the subject site, and the majority of the northern section of the
site is within the wetland.
Staff has attached the Vision and Community Goals, the general land use principles and
objectives of residential and commercial land uses from the Comprehensive Plan. The criteria for
reviewing a PUD include determining whether the PUD meets these objectives better than a
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 3 of 15 November 9, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat Planning Commission Meeting
development following the general ordinance standards. The applicant describes how they
believe their proposal achieves these purposes and objectives in their narrative.
Purpose of a Planned Unit Development
According to Section 827.25, PUD provisions are established to provide comprehensive
procedures and standards designed to allow greater flexibility in the development of
neighborhoods and/or nonresidential areas by incorporating design modifications and allowing
for a mixture of uses. The PUD process, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this
Code related to setbacks, lot area, width and depth, yards, and other development standards is
intended to encourage:
1. Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic
expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design, and placement of structures and by the
conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments.
2. Higher standards of site and building design.
3. The preservation, enhancement, or restoration of desirable site characteristics such as high quality
natural resources, wooded areas, wetlands, natural topography and geologic features and the
prevention of soil erosion.
4. Innovative approaches to stormwater management and low-impact development practices which
result in volume control and improvement to water quality beyond the standard requirements of
the City.
5. Maintenance of open space in portions of the development site, preferably linked to surrounding
open space areas, and also enhanced buffering from adjacent roadways and lower intensity uses.
6. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly
development and use pattern and more convenience in location and design of development and
service facilities.
7. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lower
development costs and public investments.
8. A development pattern that effectuates the objectives of the Medina Comprehensive Plan. (PUD is
not intended as a means to vary applicable planning and zoning principles.)
9. A more desirable and creative environment than might be possible through the strict application on
zoning and subdivision regulations of the City.
The applicant has provided a description of the flexibility contemplated by the PUD. These are
discussed throughout the report but can be summarized as follows.
• Setback for Daycare building to Meander Road – the daycare structure is proposed 12’
from the Meander Rd right-of-way rather than the 25’ required by CH district. The
applicant notes that the building is proposed to be oriented such that the western 1/3 of the
building is close to Meander Road. The eastern 2/3 of the structure exceeds the minimum.
• Setback between twinhomes – The applicant proposes 12’ between twin home buildings.
The R2 district requires 20 feet.
• Architectural/Building Materials – the applicant proposes a mix of exterior building
materials which are different from the CH standards.
• Upland buffers – the applicant proposes to meet the average upland buffer area on the
development site, but proposes limited areas narrower than the minimum width
contemplated in the ordinance. The applicant proposes to reduce the area of the required
buffer north of Meander Road, and provide an equal area south of Meander Road. The
applicant also proposes fencing and physical separation from these buffers rather than the
setback required by code.
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 4 of 15 November 9, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat Planning Commission Meeting
• Additional density north of Meander Road – the property north of Meander Road is guided
Low Density Residential (LDR), allowing development at 2-3 units/acre. The applicant
proposes 4 units, which would equate to approximately 3.5 units/acre. The
Comprehensive Plan allows for up to +20% density (3.6 units/acre) “for developments
that protect the natural features or exceed other standards of the zoning district.”
• Parking Lot Landscaping – the applicant proposes to reduce the landscaped area within the
parking lot from 8% to 5% of the parking lot area. The applicant notes that their
landscaping throughout the remainder of the site will exceed minimum standards and that
the design of the event venue and twinhomes should be viewed as contributing to the
landscaping of the site.
• Tree Replacement – there are many large cottonwood and boxelder trees on the site, as well
as many ash trees. The applicant requests flexibility for replacement because there are no
wooded areas on the site, and in recognition of the comparatively low quality of the trees
and the fact the site is intended for more intensive commercial development.
• Residential units for lodging – the applicant requests for the twinhome units to be used as
lodging rather than purely residential use. The number of units falls within the residential
density contemplated by the comprehensive plan.
• Parking – the applicant proposes alternative measures to reduce parking need for large
events, such as valet service, shuttling, and rideshare. This type of flexibility may be
permissible under the general parking standards, but may be better implemented through
the PUD.
Proposed Plat/Site Layout-Commercial
The following table compares the proposed commercial development with the dimensional
standards of the CH district. The applicant proposes an integrated development which shares
parking. As such, parking crosses the property lines and the buildings are closer to one another.
Setbacks noted below are to the exterior of the site
CH
Requirement
Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4
Minimum Lot Size 1 acre (0.5 acre
if coordinated)
6.123 acre 0.698 acre 0.784 acre 0.674 acre
Minimum Lot Width 100 feet 360’ 220’ 152’ 201’
Minimum Lot Depth 120 feet 560’ 120’ 250’ 160’
Front Setback
(Meander)
25 feet 160’ 12’ NA NA
Front Setback-Hwy 55 50 feet 177’ NA 140’ 138’
Side Setback 15 feet 205’ W 29’ E
22’ E 285’ W
Residential Setback 50 feet 160’ 48’ NE
12’ N
440’ 440’
Parking Setbacks
Front Yard 25 feet 62’ 62’ NA NA
Side/Rear 10 feet 310’ W 10’ E 10’ E NA
Residential 40 feet 62’ N 62’ N NA NA
Building Height 45 feet 30’ 23’ 18’ 16’
Hardcover 75% 43% of gross area; 62.8% of upland area
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 5 of 15 November 9, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat Planning Commission Meeting
The proposed lots meet the dimensional standards required for lots within an integrated
development. The applicant proposes flexibility for the setback for the daycare building from
Meander Road. The building is proposed to be arranged diagonally from Meander Road, so that
approximately 1/3 of the structure is less than 25’ from the front line and the eastern 2/3 of the
structure exceeds 25’. Staff believes it is important to consider the feel and characteristic of
Meander Road when considering the required setback. The roadway has a speed limit of 40
MPH and will be relatively high volume. The street does serve primarily a local purpose,
providing access to adjacent neighborhoods and commercial developments rather than through-
traffic. Staff encourages the Planning Commission and Council to provide clear direction on
whether this reduction is desirable. If the reduced setback is not supported, the footprint of the
building would likely need to be reduced.
The Fire Chief has recommended a secondary emergency access to the commercial area. The
applicant proposes a wide, heavily constructed trail/sidewalk from Meander Road to the
northeastern corner of the parking lot to serve this purpose. Staff recommends that the design of
this emergency access meet the recommendations of the Fire Chief and City Engineer. Staff also
recommends a condition that this secondary access be plowed in the winter to maintain usability.
Proposed Plat/Site Layout – Residential
The applicant proposes four twinhomes north of Meander. The property north of Meander Road
contains approximately 1.0 net acres, so two or three units would meet the allowed range of the
LDR land use (2-3 units/acre). It appears that the net acreage was erroneously calculated at 1.5
acres during concept plan review, which is why the applicant proposes 4 units, which is
approximately 3.5 unites/acre. The Comprehensive Plan does allow up to +20% density “for
developments that protect the natural features or exceed other standards of the zoning district.”
The Planning Commission and City Council should provide clear direction on whether the
proposed benefits of the PUD justify additional density.
The R1 zoning district is the main intended district to implement development in the LDR land
use. The R2 zoning district is an alternative at the City’s discretion to smaller lots to cluster
homes to protect natural resources and open space. As noted above, a PUD allows “deviation
from the strict provisions of this Code related to setbacks, lot area, width and depth, yards, and
other development standards” to serve the purposes described in the PUD ordinance. To analyze
whether to approve a rezoning to PUD, the City compares the request to the expectations of the
underlying zoning designation.
The R1 district is generally limited to detached single-family homes and the R2 zoning district
allows single- and two-family dwellings. The applicant proposes two-unit buildings. Staff
believes the best comparable is likely the R2 zoning district, but the following table compares the
plan to the R1 and R2 districts for context.
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 6 of 15 November 9, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat Planning Commission Meeting
R1 Requirement R2
Requirement
Proposed
Net Density 2-3 units/acre 2-3 units/acre 3.5 units/acre
Minimum Lot Size 11,000 s.f. 5,000 s.f./unit 14,520 s.f./unit
incl shared drive
Min Lot Width 90 feet 50 feet/unit 50 feet/unit
Min Lot Depth 100 feet 90 feet 90 feet
Front Setback 25’ (30’ to garage) 25’ (30’ to garage) 3’ to drive
52’ to Meander
Side setback 25’ combined
(10/15)
15’ combined (10/5) (single-family)
10’/10’ (2-family)
483’ to north
12’ between units
Rear setback 30’ 25’ 489’ to west
Max. Hardcover 40% 50% 50% of net area
The applicant proposes a shared driveway to serve the units. The R1 and R2 district contemplate
units fronting on public or private streets and require a 25’ front setback. The northern unit is
only 3 feet from the shared driveway. The applicant also proposes 12 feet between the two
twinhome buildings. The R2 district requires 10-foot side setbacks for two-family units (20-feet
combined).
The applicant has requested approval to utilize the homes as lodging units. The City’s residential
districts would anticipate each unit being utilized as a dwelling by a single family. The applicant
requests flexibility for each unit to be occupied by groups that may not necessarily be a single
family as described by code and acknowledges that occupancy may be on a short-term basis.
The homes could often be used in connection with the venue.
Architectural Design-Commercial
The applicant has submitted renderings and a narrative
intended to guide the design of the proposed buildings. The
applicant’s design incorporates more metal and wood than
is generally allowed in the CH district.
Building Materials
The CH district requires: “All exterior building materials shall be durable and meet the following
standards:
(a) A minimum of 30 percent of the building exterior shall be brick, natural stone, stucco (not
Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product), copper, or glass.
(b) A maximum of 70 percent may be decorative concrete, split face (rock face) decorative block,
and/or decorative pre-cast concrete panels. Decorative concrete shall be color impregnated in
earth tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a high-quality terrazzo, brick,
stucco, or travertine appearance.
(c) A maximum of 20 percent may be wood, metal (excluding copper), or fiber cement lap siding,
if used as accent materials which are integrated into the overall building design.
Building Modulation – minimum of one element per 40 linear feet of façade. Third floors shall be
set back minimum of 6 feet from lower floors.
Materials CH
Standard
Glass, stone, brick, stucco Min 30%
Concrete (decorative) Max 70%
Metal, wood, fiber cement Max 20%
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 7 of 15 November 9, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat Planning Commission Meeting
Fenestration/Transparency – “Building elevations which face a public street shall include generous
window coverage. Alternative architectural elements may be approved by the city when windows are
not practical.”
Multi-sided Architecture – “Any rear or side building elevation which faces a public street, an interior
access drive for the development, or a residential zoning district shall include design and architectural
elements of a quality generally associated with a front façade. The elevation(s) shall be compatible
with the front building elevation. Additional signage shall be permitted for an elevation facing a public
street or interior access drive, as regulated within the sign ordinance. Multi-sided architecture shall
not be required in situations where the rear or side building elevation is fully screened from view from
the adjacent street or residential property.”
The Planning Commission and Council are encouraged to provide feedback on the proposed
materials, which differ fairly significantly from the CH standards. Flexibility is permitted in the
context of the PUD if it results is a more desirable design and project than would be achievable
through strict adherence to the CH code.
The PUD provides the City increased discretion on architectural design. If the Planning Commission
and City Council desire improvements to the architecture, they should be discussed at the meeting.
Staff recommends increased modulation of the daycare and retail buildings.
Architectural Design -Residential
The applicant has provided architectural renderings for the proposed residential building.
The R1 and R2 districts do not provide much in terms of specific architectural requirements
except that garage doors which occupy more than half of a façade have to include architectural
features.
The applicant proposes wood as an exterior material and a solarium feature on the roof of the
structures. Garage doors would be less than 50% of the frontage of the structures. The PUD
process affords the City additional discretion with regard to architectural design on the
residential structures.
Wetlands
The wetland along the western edge of the
development requires upland buffers with the
average width indicated to the right. The
width of the buffer can be averaged along the edge of the wetland, provided the width is not less
than the average width indicated, and provided the area of the buffer is at least equal to the area
of the average buffer.
The City also requires a 15-foot setback for principal structures from the buffers.
Wetland Classification Avg
Buffer
Min
Buffer
North of Meander Preserve 35’ 25’
South of Meander Manage 2 25’ 20’
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 8 of 15 November 9, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat Planning Commission Meeting
The applicant proposes to provide an area of upland buffer which exceeds the minimum area if
the average buffers were applied. However, the applicant requests flexibility to how the buffers
are implemented:
• Buffer width of 2’ adjacent to the water feature along the boardwalk (area to be made up
in other locations along the wetland)
• Provide less area of upland buffer adjacent to the wetland north of Meander Road, but
provide more area adjacent to the wetland south of Meander Road to offset.
• Elimination of structure setback to buffer for the townhomes – fencing is proposed to
prevent impacts to buffer
The boardwalk along the back of the
commercial buildings is proposed at
the edge of the upland buffer. The
applicant requests to construct a
landscape feature (pictured at right,
with more information attached)
within the buffer. The area of the
buffer would be made up elsewhere.
Staff believes it is reasonable to conclude that the landscape feature would have limited impacts
on the purpose of the wetland protection ordinance, provided the area is made up elsewhere.
There is not a significant area draining to the wetland in this location. The likelihood of people
leaving the boardwalk to impact the wetland is fairly limited.
The applicant proposes to reduce the required area of upland buffer adjacent to the wetland north
of Meander Road and provide additional buffer south of Meander Road. The applicant’s purpose
in doing so is to increase the net acreage north of Meander Road so that sufficient net acreage
exists to allow 4 units. Reducing the buffer would also provide more usable space on the site.
The applicant has indicated that they would propose to provide the average required buffer for
most of the frontage of the wetland, except immediately adjacent to the twinhomes, where the
minimum buffer width of 25’ would still be provided. For the sake of calculating density, the
applicant proposes to “transfer” 10,000 square feet of required buffer to the southern wetland,
but much of this buffer would still be provided along the northern wetland.
The applicant proposes that the decks of the twinhomes be permitted to extend to the edge of the
upland buffer. A patio would be located under the deck, which would abut the buffer. The City
requires a 15’ setback for structures from the buffers primarily to reduce the likelihood of
encroachments into the buffer. Staff believes most people would not prefer decks and patios
immediately abutting the buffers. The applicant has proposed fencing between the decks/patios
and the buffers to prevent encroachments in the buffer. The applicant also notes that the units
are intended for short-term rental and lawn and landscape maintenance will be contracted, so it is
not likely that people staying in the units will desire to mow into the buffers.
The applicant is not proposing wetland impacts within their development site, but construction of
turn lanes and the trail to support the development would necessitate 0.13 acre of wetlands
impacts. Staff recommends a condition that any approval be subject to approval and
implementation of a wetland replacement plan.
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 9 of 15 November 9, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat Planning Commission Meeting
Floodplain
A floodplain is located within the large wetland to the west of the site with a base flood elevation
of 986. The lowest floor elevation of the twinhomes and venue basement is proposed at 989,
which meets the minimum required separation of two feet. The plans do include fill below the
floodplain elevation for the street widening and trail construction. The applicant proposes to
excavate in other locations adjacent to the floodplain to provide compensatory storage.
Tree Preservation,
There are a total of 78 existing significant trees on the subject site; approximately 34 trees near
the existing barn on the property and 44 trees (cottonwood, ash and boxelders) along the edge of
the wetland. The applicant proposes to remove 68 of the trees (87%) on the site. The tree
preservation ordinance would generally allow 30% of the trees to be removed without
replacement. The applicant notes that 44 of the trees to be removed are boxelder and
cottonwood, and 19 are ash trees. The applicant requests flexibility from replacement as part of
the PUD. The tree preservation ordinance does include a provision to exempt pioneering trees
such as boxelder, but this is intended as part of natural resource management. The applicant
likely could adjust the grading plan to preserve some additional boxelder and cottonwood
removal, but staff believes flexibility is appropriate as part of the PUD as a result of the
preponderance of boxelders and cottonwoods.
Landscaping - Commercial
Landscaping standards can be altered in connection with a PUD, but the requirements for
commercial districts are provided for reference.
• Building Setting - At least 10 feet of landscaped area shall be provided adjacent to all
buildings except for walks, outdoor sales areas, plaza space and approved loading docks.
Walks within this landscaped area shall be limited to where practically necessary to
serve access points of buildings.
• Minimum
Planting:
• Parking lot landscaping – minimum of 8% of parking lot area
• Landscaping islands every 20 spaces, wider separations for cells of 120 spaces
The retail and restaurant buildings do not provide landscaping areas between the parking lot and
the building. Staff requests feedback from Planning Commission and Council whether
additional landscaping area should be provided.
The plans show approximately 6% of the parking lot area being landscaped, but this may need to
be adjusted to provide adequate turn radius around the islands on the east of the parking lot. The
applicant is proposing a minimum of 5% of the parking lot area to be landscaped as part of the
PUD. Landscaping islands are proposed more often than once per 20 spaces. The applicant
proposes a landscaping/sidewalk area running north-south through the parking lot intended to
break up the parking lot.
Requirement Required Proposed
Overstory trees 1 per 50’ site perimeter 49 trees 51
Ornamental trees 1 per 100’ site perimeter 25 trees 25
Shrubs 1 per 30’ site perimeter 82 shrubs 190+1139
perennials
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 10 of 15 November 9, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat Planning Commission Meeting
Landscaping – Residential
The R2 district would require a minimum of 2 trees per unit. A buffer yard would be required to
the east and west of the subject residential development. In this case, there is a wetland with a
width more than 1000 feet to the west. The applicant has proposed trees to the west of the units.
The shared driveway is proposed only 5 feet from the eastern property line, so the applicant
proposes a line of grasses east of the shared drive as a buffer.
Transportation
The applicant proposes one access for the commercial property to Meander Road along the west
of the project. The applicant has submitted a traffic analysis which has been reviewed by the
City Engineer. The analysis recommended construction of a left-turn lane from Meander into the
site. The City Engineer has recommended that a safety analysis be provided to determine
whether a right-turn lane should be required as well.
The City completed a visioning study for future Tamarack Drive located approximately ¼ mile
to the east during the summer of 2020. The vision anticipated a signalized intersection at
Highway 55 and Tamarack Drive which would serve as the primary access for commercial
development in the area, including the subject site. The study included a broader study of the
future circulation for development property east and west of Tamarack Drive as well. The
conceptual layout approved at the end of the study calls for connection from Meander Road to
Tamarack Drive and for the commercial development in this area to have convenient access to
the connection to more easily reach Tamarack Dr. The City Council discussed potential
connectivity from this site to the commercial property to the east during concept plan review.
Ultimately, the City Council’s feedback during concept plan review was that the City should not
require a street connection through this subject site or a specific connection to the east. The
Council encouraged that the design provide flexibility for potential connection to the east so that
connectivity may be possible depending on the layout of the site to the east.
The proposed layout of this site includes parking along much of the eastern frontage. Staff
believes this provides a fair amount of flexibility, because an access could be extended to the
east almost anywhere along the edge of the parking lot. Staff recommends a condition
addressing the possibility of this future connection in the development agreement.
The Tamarack visioning study had identified the cost of improvements at Highway 55 to install
the signals and turn lanes and had estimated the area of different new uses which necessitate the
improvement. The subject site was estimated as 5.4% of the signal project and 8.2% of the
northern turn lanes at Highway 55. Staff recommends that the City require execution of a
Petition and Waiver allowing future assessment of this portion of the project against the lots in
the development.
Parking
The applicant proposes approximately 230
parking spaces. Adding the total minimum
parking spaces for the uses, a minimum of 254
spaces would be required. The parking
ordinances allows adjustments to minimum
parking requirements for shared parking when peak use does not overlap.
Use Calculation # Required
stalls
Restaurant 1 stall/3 seats 250 seats 84
Venue 1 stall/3 seats 300 capacity 100
Daycare 1/250 s.f. 7500 s.f. 30
Retail 1/250 s.f. 10,000 s.f. 40
Total: 254
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 11 of 15 November 9, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat Planning Commission Meeting
Staff believes the venue and restaurant would share peak use, which would be at different times
from the daycare. As such, providing consideration for shared parking seems reasonable.
The applicant included a parking needs analysis as part of their traffic study. The analysis
concludes that parking would be sufficient during average parking generation. It concludes a
deficit at the 85 percentile of parking generation. The applicant notes that they would propose to
use valet parking and shuttling for large events. The applicant also anticipates significant
rideshare use for the venue.
Staff recommends a condition that the applicant implement these practices as necessary and that
agreements be recorded against the lots ensuring shared parking.
Sewer/Water
The applicant will extend sewer and water to the site from the northeast. Staff recommends that
sewer service be extended north of twinhomes because this is anticipated to serve future
residential development north of Fields of Medina. Staff recommends a condition that the
applicant address comments of the City Engineer, which are attached for reference.
Stormwater/Grading Review
The applicant proposes stormwater management with a dry retention basin for the twinhome area
and a biofiltration basin and underground irrigation reuse for the commercial area. Staff
recommends a condition that the applicant meet the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed
and address the comments of the City Engineer.
Lighting
The applicant proposes lantern-style light fixtures which are downcast, but provide a decorative
shield which glows. Details are included with the plans. The CH district requires all lighting to
be downcast and that light not exceed 0.5 FC at the property line. The applicant has submitted
photometrics, which shows the light at some points along the eastern property line in excess of
0.5 FC. Staff recommends a condition to adjust the light location or to shield the fixtures such
that light does not exceed 0.5 FC.
Park/Trails/Multi-Modal
The Park Commission is scheduled to review the project at
the November 16 meeting. The City’s subdivision ordinance
requires the following to be dedicated for parks, trails and
public open space purposes, at the City’s option:
• Land – 0.73 acre – Up to 10% of the buildable land
• Cash-in-lieu of land – estimated $60,000-$90,000 (to be confirmed by City Assessor) –
8% of the pre-developed market value; residential portion subject to minimum of
$3500/residential unit, maximum of $8000/residential unit
• Combination of the above
The Park at the Fields of Medina is located approximately ¼ acre to the northeast of the site and
no additional park improvement are identified in the City’s Park Plan. An existing trail is located
north of Meander Road to the northeast of the site. The City’s trail plan calls for the trail to be
Park Dedication Recommendation
• Trail along north of Meander
• Park fee for remainder
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 12 of 15 November 9, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat Planning Commission Meeting
extended westerly to Arrowhead Drive. Staff would recommend that necessary easements be
provided along the north of Meander Road and that the trail be constructed in connection with
the development, as least to the edge of the wetland.
The applicant proposes sidewalk, boardwalk and trail connections within the commercial
development as well. Staff would recommend that the sidewalk near the boardwalk be extended
to the eastern property line for potential connectivity in the future. As noted above, the Fire
Chief has requested a 2nd emergency access to the site. The applicant has indicated that they will
propose a wide and heavily constructed trail/sidewalk along the east of the site from Meander to
the parking lot. Staff believe this trail will provide good opportunities for connectivity to the
east in the future.
The potential route for the Diamond Lake Regional Trail is also in the vicinity of this property.
The route shows the corridor going from north of Fields of Medina with a grade-separated
crossing of Highway 55. The conceptual route approved by City Council for consideration in the
Master Plan is shown in green on the aerial on the next page. The site is outlined in pink.
Although the conceptual route is east
of the subject site, staff believes it is
advisable to consider alternative
opportunities to provide the most
flexibility for the trail to be connected
in the future. It may be advantageous
to require dedication of more
easements than may be necessary to
provide more flexibility to link the
corridor with adjacent sites. The City
may not utilize all of the easements,
but could vacate in the future.
In this case, there is a 60-foot wide
strip of property running north-south
along the eastern property line. This
strip of land contains a driveway
serving the two rural parcels north of
Fields of Medina. Staff believes this
strip may provide a good alternative
for the north-south connection if an
alternative is desired rather than
running through the Park at the Fields
of Medina. Future development of
the larger commercial site further east
also provides opportunity for a north-
south connection
As such, staff is not recommending
requiring land for the Diamond Lake
Regional Trail on this subject site.
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 13 of 15 November 9, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat Planning Commission Meeting
Review Criteria
Planned Unit Development
The City has a high level of discretion when reviewing a PUD because it is a rezoning, which is
a legislative action. A PUD should only be approved if it achieves the purposes of the PUD
district (described on page 3), the Comprehensive Plan, and other City policies.
The PUD process allows flexibility to the general zoning standards to result in a more desirable
development than would be expected through strict adherence to the requirements, which in this
case are the CH and R1 or R2 requirements. The process provides flexibility which is ultimately
at the discretion of the City. Such flexibility often cuts in both directions, certain aspects of the
development may not meet the general standards while other exceed minimum standards. The
flexibility provides the opportunity for collaboration in site design because the City can request
adjustments which may be seen as preferred, but would not be required under general standards.
Preliminary Plat
The City has a comparatively low level of discretion while reviewing a preliminary plat. Unless
the Council makes one or more of the findings for denial noted below, a preliminary plat should
be approved.
“In the case of all subdivisions, the City shall deny approval of a preliminary or final plat if one
or a combination of the following findings are made:
(a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city,
or that the proposed subdivision is premature, as defined in Section 820.28.
(b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography,
vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are
such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated.
(c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does
not meet minimum lot size standards.
(d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause
substantial environmental damage.
(e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious
public health problems.
(f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or
private streets, easements or right-of-way.
In this case, the portion of the property north of Meander Road is zoned RR-UR, so the plat is
contingent upon the rezoning to PUD. If the PUD were not approved, the proposed lots would
not meet minimum lot standards, which is one of the findings for denial. If the PUD is approved,
it does not appear that these findings are met, so the plat could be approved, subject to the
conditions suggested below.
Staff Comments
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission and City Council consider the PUD purpose
and Comp Plan objectives to determine if the PUD results in a more desirable development than
that which may be achievable through strict adherence with the standards.
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 14 of 15 November 9, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat Planning Commission Meeting
Staff has summarized the requirements of the underlying districts through the report, and the
flexibility being proposed was described throughout, and summarized on the bottom of page 3 of
the report.
The Planning Commission and City Council may find that some amount of flexibility serves the
purpose and objectives described above, but that adjustments are necessary for the request to be
justified. In such an instance, staff would recommend that the Commission and Council provide
specific changes which may shift the balance and serve those purposes and objectives. It is
important to acknowledge that the alternative would be that the site may be developed under
standard requirements at some time in the future.
If the Planning Commission finds that the PUD serves the purpose of the PUD ordinance and
objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, including any recommended adjustments, staff would
recommend the following conditions:
1) The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall
include the conditions described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance
or policy.
2) The Applicant shall construct necessary turn lane improvements on Meander Road.
3) The Applicant shall execute and record access agreement(s) in a form and of substance
satisfactory to the City Attorney to ensure both lots have access.
4) The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated 10/20/2022 and
09/09/2022 except as may be modified herein. The plans shall be updated to address the
comments of the City Engineer and submitted for review in connection with final plat
application.
5) The Applicant shall dedicate a trail easement along the north of Meander Road right-of-
way and construct the trail to the crossing at the commercial access. Cash-in-lieu of
additional land dedication in an amount recommended by the Park Commission shall be
provided.
6) The Applicant shall update plans to provide a secondary emergency access, the design of
which shall be subject to approval by the Fire Chief and City Engineer. This emergency
access shall maintained/plowed to ensure usability.
7) The Applicant shall submit emergency vehicle turning exhibits and adjust parking lot
layout as necessary to ensure adequate circulation.
8) The Applicant shall update plans to provide landscaping adjacent to the retail and
restaurant buildings.
9) The Applicant shall update lighting plans such that light does not exceed 0.5 FC at the
property line.
10) The plat shall dedicate drainage and utility easements over all water mains and hydrants,
over stormwater improvements and in other locations recommended by the City
Engineer.
11) The watermain and hydrants within the commercial lots shall be privately maintained.
12) The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site
improvements in order to ensure completion.
13) The Applicant shall execute and record a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement in a form
and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney to describe the responsibility of the
property owners to maintain the private stormwater improvements.
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 15 of 15 November 9, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat Planning Commission Meeting
14) The PUD General Plan shall be contingent upon approval and implementation of a Wetland
Conservation Act Wetland Replacement Plan.
15) The Applicant shall meet the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance including
but not limited to: execution and recordation of Upland Buffer Easement Agreement in a
form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney, planting of appropriate vegetation,
and installation of signage.
16) The commercial property shall be subject to the City’s lawn and landscaping irrigation
regulations. No lawn or landscape irrigation systems shall be permitted to be connected to
the City water system.
17) The Applicant shall update the architectural design of the daycare and retail buildings to
provide improved modulation.
18) The Applicant shall obtain all permits required by Elm Creek Watershed District,
Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Minnesota Department of Health, the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council and any other relevant
agencies.
19) The applicant shall enter into a petition and waiver with the City in a form and of substance
acceptable to the City Attorney related to future assessment for construction of Tamarack
Drive.
20) Building plans shall be subject to review and approval by City staff for general compliance
with the general plan of development and design standards document dated _____.
21) The Applicant shall provide title evidence prior to or at the time of final plat application
and abide by the recommendations of the City Attorney with regard to title matters and
recording instructions.
22) The final plat application shall be filed within 180 days from the date of this resolution or
the approval hereby granted shall be considered void, unless a written request for time
extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council.
23) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for
the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, general plan of development, construction
plans, and other relevant documents.
Potential Action
If the Commission finds that the proposed PUD achieves the purpose of the PUD ordinance and
better achieves the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and other City policies, the following
action could be taken:
Move to recommend approval of the PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat, subject to the
conditions noted in the staff report, [and subject to the following changes to the General Plan (if
any)].
Attachments
1. Comp Plan Info
2. Engineering comments
3. Applicant narrative
4. PUD Flexibility Summary
5. Proposed Architectural Requirement Summary
6. Water Feature Exhibit
7. Civil Plans
8. Architectural information
Chapter 2 – Vision and Community Goals Page 2 - 1
Adopted October 2, 2018
Chapter 2: VISION & COMMUNITY GOALS
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
The Vision and Community Goals chapter is the heart of the Comprehensive Plan and provides
the foundation from which City officials make consistent and supporting land use decisions.
This chapter includes a set of general community goals that guided the creation of this Plan.
The concepts in this chapter are some of the few static elements of the Comprehensive Plan. If
land uses change or other infrastructure varies from the Plan, decisions will be founded in the
goals set forth below. The Vision and Goals were created with the involvement of the
Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee (the “Steering Committee”), City officials, and
residents of Medina and are broadly supported.
Land use designations are subject to strong social and economic pressures to change.
Accordingly, it is appropriate that such systems be periodically evaluated in light of changing
social and economic conditions. As development evolves, the Vision and Goals will provide the
guidance for accomplishing the vision for the future of the community even when changes are
necessary to the land use plan.
Detailed objectives and recommendations are contained within each of the subject chapters of
this plan.
Creating the Vision and Goals
The residents, the Steering Committee, City officials and staff participated in the planning
process for the Plan. A series of public participation meetings were conducted to introduce and
solicit information from the residents of Medina. The Steering Committee held work sessions
that focused on integrating the concerns and desires of the community together with
accommodating growth and regional impacts. An online forum provided additional
opportunity for residents to impact the Vision and Community Goals as they were formulated.
In addition to land use and growth planning, the City implemented open space, natural
resources, and infrastructure planning. The goals which guided this process are integrated into
this chapter.
Each element of this plan was developed with assistance from city officials and a diverse group
of community stakeholders producing a truly representative plan. The City made a conscious
decision to emphasize natural resources and open space conservation.
Chapter 2 – Vision and Community Goals Page 2 - 2
Adopted October 2, 2018
Community Vision
The following statement provides a vision of the community for the future and the resultant
goals and strategies.
Medina is a community united by a common goal: to sustain and enhance the quality of life of its
residents. Medina will protect its significant natural resources and open space throughout the City,
while honoring its rural heritage and fostering safe and well-designed neighborhoods, places of recreation
and destinations for citizens to gather. Development within the City will be commensurate with available
transportation systems, municipal services and school capacity.
Community Goals
The following Community Goals are derived from the Vision Statement and inform objectives
and strategies throughout the various aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
• Preserve rural vistas, open spaces, and wetlands in all parts of the community to
promote the rural character of Medina.
• Protect and enhance the environment and natural resources throughout the community.
• Encourage and incent innovative and environmentally friendly approaches to planning,
engineering and development.
• Expand urban services only as necessary to accommodate regionally forecasted
residential growth, desired business opportunities and achievement of other
Community Goals. Such development and growth shall be at a sustainable pace
proportionate with capacity of schools and transportation, water supply and wastewater
infrastructure available to the City.
• Spread development so that it is not geographically concentrated during particular
timeframes.
• Promote public and private gathering places and civic events that serve the entire
community.
• Preserve and expand trails and parks to provide community recreational facilities,
connect neighborhoods, and encourage healthy lifestyles of its residents.
• Provide opportunities for a diversity of housing at a range of costs to support residents
at all stages of their lives.
• Encourage an attractive, vibrant business community that complements the residential
areas of the City.
• Maintain its commitment to public safety through support of the City’s police
department and coordinate with its contracted volunteer fire departments.
• Manage the City through prudent budgeting processes, retaining a skilled and efficient
staff and long-range planning and financial management.
Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 4
Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 4
While these ordinance standards help protect solar access, it is not possible for every part of a
building or lot to obtain unobstructed solar access. Mature trees, topography, and the location
of structures can limit solar access. However, on most properties the rooftop of the principal
building would be free of shading by adjacent structures. Therefore, the majority of property
owners in the City could utilize solar energy systems, if they so desired, as a supplement or
alternative to conventional fuels.
HHiissttoorriicc PPrreesseerrvvaattiioonn
The City of Medina currently does not have any sites or structures listed on the National
Register of Historic Places. The City of Medina has a strong interest in preserving
representative portions of its history. The City previously worked with the West Hennepin
Pioneer Museum to restore the Wolsfeld Family cabin which was originally built in 1856. It is
thought to be one of the original homes in Medina. The City further commits to providing the
following general guidelines related to historical preservation:
• Partner with organizations that want to preserve historically significant areas, landmarks,
and buildings in Medina;
• Modify zoning regulations as necessary to help preserve areas that may be historically
significant.
FFuuttuurree GGeenneerraall LLaanndd UUssee PPoolliiccyy DDiirreeccttiioonn
As described in the Vision Statement, the City of Medina strives to promote and protect its open
spaces and natural environment. The City has historically been, and intends to continue to be,
primarily a rural community.
The City has planned for a limited amount of future development consistent with regional
forecast and consistent with Community Goals.
Future Land Use Plan Principles
The Future Land Use Plan guides the development of Medina through 2040, and will be used to
implement the City’s goals, strategies and policies. The Plan is guided by the Vision and
Community Goals as furthered by the following principles:
Development Patterns and Neighborhood Form
• Encourage open spaces, parks and trails in all neighborhood developments. Surveys
indicate that a high quality of life is found when residents have visual access to green
spaces.
• Create neighborhoods with a variety of housing types that are well connected with
roads, trails or sidewalks.
• Maintain the integrity of rural neighborhoods and promote development patterns
consistent with existing rural residential development.
• Recognize neighborhood characteristics and promote new development compatible in
scale, architectural quality and style with existing neighborhoods.
• Stage residential growth to minimize the amount of adjacent developments which
occur within the same time period.
Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 5
Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 5
• Guide density to areas with proximity to existing infrastructure and future
infrastructure availability.
• Concentrate higher density development near service oriented businesses to help
promote walkability.
• Consider planned development in surrounding communities when making land use
decisions in the City.
Road Patterns
• Recognize regional highway capacity and planned improvements, along with use
forecasts, as major factors in planning for growth and land use changes.
• Establish collector streets with good connections through the community’s growth
areas.
• Promote trails and sidewalk access near roads and thoroughfares to encourage multi-
modal transportation choices.
• Consider opportunities to improve north-south travel within the City.
Open Spaces and Natural Resources
• Preserve natural resources throughout the community and provide educational
opportunities to residents to help them understand the value of natural areas.
• Preserve open spaces and natural resources.
• Protect wooded areas and encourage improvement of existing resources and
reforestation. Evaluate existing woodland protections and supplement as necessary.
• Support the guidelines identified in the Open Space Report to preserve the City’s
natural systems.
Business Districts and Commercial Areas
• Focus service businesses and development near urban residential densities and along
primary transportation corridors.
• Provide connections between residents and commercial areas and promote businesses
within mixed-use areas.
• Work to create job opportunities in the community for Medina residents to reduce
traffic and commuting demands.
• Emphasize service and retail uses which serve the needs of the local community and
provide opportunities for the community to gather.
• Support business development with a corporate campus style which provides open
spaces and protects natural resources.
Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 6
Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 6
TThhee GGuuiiddee PPllaann
Medina's Future Land Use Plan, Map 5-3, maintains Medina’s rural character and protects the
City's natural resources while accommodating limited growth and development which is
consistent with the City’s Vision, Community Goals and Land Use Principles.
Table 5-2 below demonstrates the expected 2040 land uses in the community.
TABLE 5-2
FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
Future Land Use (2040) Gross
Acreage % Net
Acreage %
Rural Residential 8,402.2 49.1% 6,015.3 35.1%
Agriculture 222.7 1.3% 174.5 1.0%
Future Development Area 671.9 3.9% 547.9 3.2%
Low Density Residential 1172.5 6.8% 865.7 5.1%
Medium Density Residential 58.5 0.3% 46.2 0.3%
High Density Residential 29.6 0.2% 25.7 0.2%
Mixed Residential 137.1 0.8% 94.1 0.6%
Uptown Hamel 45.0 0.3% 41.2 0.2%
Commercial 254.2 1.5% 197.6 1.2%
Business 704.6 4.1% 471.9 2.8%
Rural Commercial 67.5 0.4% 47.6 0.3%
Institutional 270.2 1.6% 194.0 1.1%
Parks, Recreation, Open Space 2,771.5 16.2% 1,971.2 11.5%
Private Recreation 343.1 2.0% 297.5 1.7%
Closed Sanitary Landfill 192.2 1.1% 124.7 0.7%
Right-of-Way 673.1 3.9% 616.9 3.6%
Total Acres 16,015.9 11,732.0
Lakes and Open Water* 1,104.6 6.5% 1,104.6 6.5%
Wetlands and Floodplain 4,283.9 25.0%
Total City 17,120.5 17,120.5
* Lakes and Open Water amounts include areas adjacent to lakes which are not included in
Hennepin County parcel data and exclude un-meandered lakes.
The Growth and Development Map (Map 5-4) highlights areas within the City in which a change
of land use is contemplated by the Future Land Use plan. The map also highlights wetland areas
within Medina which significantly affect land planning, development, and infrastructure
decisions.
Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 7
Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 7
Future Land Use Designations
Rural Residential (RR) identifies areas for low-intensity uses, such as rural residential, hobby
farms, agricultural, horticulture, conservation of ecologically significant natural resources and
passive recreation. Density within the RR land use shall be no more than one lot per 10 acres
and the area is not planned to be served by urban services during the timeframe covered by this
Plan.
Agricultural (AG) identifies areas which are planned for long-term agricultural uses. Density
within the land use can be no more than one lot per 40 acres which will not be served by urban
services. Property within this land use is eligible to be part of the Metropolitan Agricultural
Preserves Program.
Future Development Area (FDA) identifies areas which could potentially be planned for future
urban development in the City that will be provided municipal sewer and water services. This
area will remain rural unless and until designated for urban services in a future Comprehensive
Plan update. The purpose of the FDA designation is to communicate the future planning
intentions to the community. This designation is tentative and depends greatly on future
infrastructure improvements, including to regional highway capacity.
Low Density Residential (LDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 2.0 units
per acre and 3.0.units per acre which are served, or are intended to be served, by urban
services. The primary use in this area is single- and two-family residential development.
Medium Density Residential (MDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 5.0
and 7.0 units per acre that are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The
primary uses in this designation will be a mix of housing such as single-family residential, twin
homes, town homes, row homes, and small multiple family buildings.
High Density Residential (HDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 12.0 and
15.0 units per acre that are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The primary
uses will include town homes, apartment buildings and condominiums which should
incorporate some open space or an active park.
Mixed Residential (MR) identifies residential land uses that may be developed with a variety
of housing styles at an overall average density between 3.5 and 4.0 units per net acre, within
which a minimum of the units equivalent to 1.0 unit per acre are required to be developed at
higher densities above 8.0 units per acre. Uses within the MR land use are served, or are
intended to be served, by urban services. The land use provides flexibility for the type of
housing to be developed, including detached single family, twin homes, townhomes and
multiple family buildings. The MR land use will allow for different types of housing to be
developed in coordination with each other or independently, provided the objectives related to
overall density and minimum number of higher density housing units can be achieved within a
defined area.
Uptown Hamel (UH) the Uptown Hamel land use allows residential and commercial uses to be
mixed on adjacent sites and to be mixed within the same building or property. Residential
development in this designation may be between 4.0 and 15.0 units per acre. The Uptown
Hamel area is served by urban services.
Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 8
Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 8
Commercial (C) provides areas for highway oriented businesses and retail establishments
including commercial, office and retail uses. These uses are concentrated along the arterial
corridors and are served or will be served by urban services.
Business (B) provides opportunities for corporate campus uses including office, warehouse,
and light industrial. This designation identifies larger tracts of land that are suitable for office
and business park developments and are served or will be served by urban services.
Rural Commercial (RC) identifies commercial land uses which are not served by urban services,
but rather by individual wells and septic systems. The scale of development in this land use shall
be limited to protect water resources.
Institutional (INST) identifies existing public, semi-public, and non-profit uses such as
governmental, cemeteries, religious, educational and utilities.
Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) identifies publicly owned or permanently conserved
land which is used for park, recreational, or open space purposes.
Private Recreation (PREC) identifies areas that are currently used for outdoor recreational uses
which are held under private ownership but are not publicly maintained. Limited numbers of
residential uses may be included or have previously been developed within this land use
designation, accounting for no more than 10% of the land area. Density within the residential
portion of the use shall be between 2.0 and 3.0 units per net acre where urban services are
available and one unit per 10 acres where services are not available. The City does not
anticipate additional residential development within the land use.
Closed Sanitary Landfill (SL) identifies an existing closed sanitary landfill. The Woodlake
Landfill is owned by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) as part of Minnesota’s
Closed Landfill Program. The MPCA has jurisdiction over land use regulations of the landfill
and has made available a description of the types, locations, and potential movement of
hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants, or decomposition gases related to the
facility in its Closed Landfill Plan. The City hereby incorporates such information and the City
will provide such information as required by law.
Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 13
Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 13
UUrrbbaann SSeerrvviiccee DDeessiiggnnaattiioonnss
The Urban Service Area includes the residential and commercial areas of the City that are
currently or will be served by municipal water and sewer services.
Residential Uses
Objectives:
1. Require preservation of natural slopes, wetlands, woodlands, and other significant
natural characteristics of the property.
2. Consider exceptions to or modifications of density restrictions for developments that
protect the natural features or exceed other standards of the zoning district. Such
modification shall generally not exceed -10% of the minimum density or +20% of the
maximum density requirement of the relevant land use.
3. Restrict urban development to properties within the sewer service boundary.
4. Regulate land within the Mixed Residential land use to provide opportunities for
residential development with a density in excess of 8 units/acre. Flexibility is
purposefully provided within the land use to support opportunities for a single project to
provide both low- and high- density housing or for multiple developers to partner on
independent projects within a Mixed Residential area.
5. Encourage green building practices such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design (LEED) principles in neighborhood planning and residential building and low
impact development design standards.
6. Regulate the rate and location of development in keeping with availability of public
facilities and the City's stated goals, including the undesignated MUSA and growth
strategies.
7. Restrict commercial and business development to areas designated in this Plan.
8. Protect property within the City's MUSA boundary from development prior to the
provision of urban services that will hinder future division.
9. Create flexible zoning standards that would allow for innovative arrangements of homes,
conservation easements, or other creative land use concepts that preserve the City's open
space and natural features.
10. Promote attractive, well-maintained dwellings on functional, clearly marked roads, with
adequate facilities and open space.
11. Emphasize resident and pedestrian safety.
12. Encourage a controlled mix of densities, housing types, age groups, economic levels, lot
sizes, and living styles that are of appropriate scale and consistent with appropriate land
use, market demands, and development standards.
13. Establish design criteria for platting and developing site plans which will be compatible
with surrounding physical features, existing land uses and the preservation of
Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 14
Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 14
ecologically significant natural resources.
14. Establish standards for higher density residential development so that such development
is compatible with surrounding uses. Such standards may include enclosed parking,
green space, landscape buffering and height limitations.
15. Require utilities to be placed underground wherever possible for reasons of aesthetic
enhancement and safety.
16. Plan interconnections between separate developments to encourage shared road use to
reduce costs and minimize the amount of road surface required.
17. Require planning of trails and walkway systems in the early design stages of all new
development so that residential areas are provided safe access to parks and open space.
18. In urban residential zones with sanitary sewer service permit higher density in PUD’s in
exchange for (1) reduced land coverage by buildings, (2) provision of more multi-family
units; and, (3) sensitive treatment of natural resources.
19. Implement standards for lot sizes and setbacks which recognize the development
characteristics and natural resources of each existing neighborhood.
20. Regulate noise, illumination, and odors as needed to protect residential neighborhoods
and to maintain public health and safety.
Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 16
Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 16
Commercial Uses
The following objectives refer to commercial land uses which will provide a variety of retail
products and services mixed with smaller offices.
Objectives:
1. Require preservation of natural slopes, wetlands, woodlands, and other significant natural
characteristics of the property.
2. Provide convenient and attractive shopping and services to meet the needs of City
residents.
3. Encourage businesses that benefit the local community by providing employment
opportunities offering convenience goods and services, utilizing high quality design, and
having limited impact on public services.
4. Require commercial activities that serve the broader metropolitan market to have access
to a regional highway or frontage road.
5. Regulate the impact of commercial development along the border between commercially
and residentially guided areas to ensure that commercial property has a minimal impact
on residential areas.
6. Regulate construction to ensure high quality, energy and resource efficient buildings and
to promote such Green Building standards as LEED Certifications or the State of
Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines: Buildings, Benchmarks and Beyond (B-3)
standards.
7. Encourage construction that enhances the visual appeal of TH 55 corridor and the rural
vistas and open spaces of the City.
8. Establish standards for the commercial area north of TH 55 at Tamarack Drive which
results in a high quality, walkable and appropriately scaled development which
complements nearby residential neighborhoods, emphasizes goods and services for local
residents over highway users and provides gathering opportunities for the community.
9. Require frontage roads that do not directly access arterial roadways and limit access to
arterial and collector roadways.
10. Limit the scale of commercial development where urban services are not available to
protect water resources and to integrate such uses with surrounding rural lands.
11. Use the site plan review process to ensure that commercial and industrial uses are
compatible with neighboring future and existing uses, and with the adjoining public
streets and highways. PUD’s may be used to help accomplish this policy.
12. Emphasize pedestrian safety.
13. Require utilities to be placed underground wherever possible for reasons of aesthetic
enhancement and safety.
14. Regulate noise, illumination, and odors as needed to maintain public health and safety.
HIGHWAY 55
")55
")24
")19
")101
")116
")11
")24
")19
£¤12
HAMEL RD
MEDINA RD
PIONEER TRL
TAMARACK DR
WILLOW DR
HACKAMORE RD
ARROWHEAD DR
HOMESTEAD TRL
CHIPPEWA RD
HUNTER DR
PARKVIEW DR
BROCKTON LN N
MEANDER RD
EVERGREEN RD
BROCKTON LN N
CHIPPEWA RD
WILLOW DR
WILLOW DR
HUNTER DR
")55
Katrina
Independence
Mooney
School
Peter
Spurzem
Holy Name
Half Moon
Wolsfeld
Krieg
Winterhalter
Miller
Thies
Ardmore
Map 5-3Future Land Use Plan
0 0.5 10.25 Miles
Map Date: October 2, 2018
Legend
Future Land Use
Rural Residential
Agricultural
Future Development Area
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Mixed Residential
Uptown Hamel
Commercial
Business
Rural Commercial
Institutional
Private Recreational
Park, Recreational, and Open Space
Closed Sanitary Landfill
HIGHWAY 55
")55
")24
")19
")101
")116
")11
")24
")19
£¤12
HAMEL RD
MEDINA RD
PIONEER TRL
TAMARACK DR
WILLOW DR
HACKAMORE RD
ARROWHEAD DR
HOMESTEAD TRL
CHIPPEWA RD
HUNTER DR
PARKVIEW DR
BROCKTON LN N
MEANDER RD
EVERGREEN RD
BROCKTON LN N
CHIPPEWA RD
WILLOW DR
WILLOW DR
HUNTER DR
")55
Katrina
Independence
Mooney
School
Peter
Spurzem
Holy Name
Half Moon
Wolsfeld
Krieg
Winterhalter
Miller
Thies
Ardmore
Map 5-4Development and Growth Plan
0 0.5 10.25 Miles
Map Date: October 2, 2018
Legend
Future Land Use
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Mixed Residential
Uptown Hamel
Commercial
Business
Wetland Locations
Wetland Locations
K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2022-09-12 Submittal\2022-09-30 Meander Park & Boardwalk FPrelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx
70
1
X
E
N
I
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
|
SU
I
T
E
3
0
0
| M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
,
M
N
|
55
4
1
6
|
76
3
.
5
4
1
.
4
8
0
0
|
W
S
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
October 5, 2022
Mr. Dusty Finke
City Planning Director
City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340-9790
Re: Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans & Preliminary Plat – Engineering Review
City Project No. LR-21-310
WSB Project No. 019539-000
Dear Mr. Finke:
WSB staff have reviewed the Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans and Preliminary Plat
submittal dated September 9, 2022. The applicant proposes to construct a business park,
boardwalk, recreational amenities, and villa style detached townhomes on a total of 18-acres
located along Meander Road on the north side of TH 55 and east of Arrowhead Drive.
The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina’s general
engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with
regards to engineering and stormwater management matters.
Preliminary Plat & General Comments
1. The City Planner will provide comments pertaining to the proposed landscaping,
sidewalk/trail connectivity/easements, and tree preservation plan under separate cover.
2. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building
structures, cul-de-sacs, and roundabout area as required by the City Fire Marshall. The
Fire Marshall will review and provide comments under separate cover.
3. Provide additional right-of-way along Meander Road to accommodate future right turn
lanes into the applicant’s commercial site and the future commercial site further to the
east that will have an access road opposite Cavanaugh Drive.
4. Provide additional ROW on the north side of Meander Road, 2’ from far edge of trail.
5. A visioning study was completed in August of 2020 that included this development area,
the adjacent commercial development area to the east, and the Tamarack Drive
extension corridor. The study included potential commercial site layouts that indicated
access between commercial parcels. For the primary access drive lane proposed from
Meander Road south and east adjacent to the future “Day Care” location provide cross
access easement agreements to provide flexibility in the connection of the driveway to
future easterly commercial areas.
Consider the reduction of parking spaces along this corridor to minimize conflict points.
See additional comments below within the traffic study section.
6. Provide confirmation that sufficient electrical service is available for the data center use.
City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans & Preliminary Plat – Engineering Review
October 5, 2022
Page 2
K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2022-09-12 Submittal\2022-09-30 Meander Park & Boardwalk FPrelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx
7. In order to calculate a letter of credit and construction engineering escrow amounts for
the final development agreement, an engineer’s estimate (in Excel format) of the
proposed street and utility improvements along with a schedule for completion of
construction will be required. The estimate should also include the cost of landscaping
items.
8. Additional comments have been provided directly on the plan sheets. Not all comments
on the plans have been summarized in this review letter.
Existing Conditions & Demolition Plans (Sheets C1.0 – C1.2)
9. With preliminary plat submittal, provide a removals/demolition plan to show what trees
are proposed to be removed, buildings to be demolished, impacts to Meander Road, etc.
Complete.
10. The existing site and demolition plans will also need to include existing utility pipe sizes,
pipe material types, etc.
Site & Paving Plans (C2.0 – C2.2 & C3.0 – C3.2)
11. Provide a figure showing truck movements throughout the site including the largest truck
(semi-truck) and the largest fire truck. Design driveways and circulation routes to
accommodate these vehicles and required turn around space(s) as required by the City
Fire Marshall.
12. City design standards typically require horizontal and vertical curve lengths to meet a 30
MPH design speed (for the townhome road). Where site constraints do not allow this
standard to be met and the roadway is designated as private, the City will consider
alternative designs where emergency access requirements are met.
13. The proposed private road does not meet City design standards at 20’, refer to City
design standards.
14. Additional Meander Road comments:
a. Meander Road is a State aid street and so State Aid design standards are
necessary.
b. For the proposed improvements along Meander Road, the design standards for
horizontal and vertical curves will need to mee a 40 MPH design speed.
c. Provide a profile view with future submittals that include vertical curve lengths.
Provide alignment data.
d. Lane widths meet state aid standards.
e. Provide confirmation that turn lane length sufficient to accommodate projected
turning movements into the site
f. If this plan will be submitted to MnDOT State Aid there will need to be an SEQ,
earthwork information, and cross sections.
Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control (Sheets C4.0 – C4.4)
15. Provide a more detailed grading and drainage plan with future submittals. With final plat
submittal include drainage arrows on the grading plan showing the direction of flow and
slope percentages.
16. Provide EOF locations for all low points inside and outside the roadway.
City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans & Preliminary Plat – Engineering Review
October 5, 2022
Page 3
K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2022-09-12 Submittal\2022-09-30 Meander Park & Boardwalk FPrelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx
17. A full review of the erosion/sediment control plan and SWPPP sheets will be completed
with future submittals. Silt fence should be shown around all wetland boundaries.
Redundant perimeter control is required adjacent to wetlands. Provide two layers of silt
fence space 5’ a part.
18. With final plat submittal provide the following
a. In general maintain all surface grades within the minimum of 2% and maximum
33% slopes. Vegetated swale grades shall also be a minimum of 2.0%.
Complete.
b. Drainage arrows on plans showing direction of runoff. Note specifically high
points between each side-yard swale.
c. Include percent slope In all other swale locations and verify that it meets the City
requirement of 2% minimum.
d. The City will require a common draintile collection system (rigid PVC Schedule
40 or SDR 26) for sump pump discharges. A separate foundation pipe system in
addition to the sump discharge system should be considered where full
basements are proposed. The size of the common collection system should be 6”
and comprised of PVC schedule 40 or SDR 26.
e. Add rip-rap quantities and class notes at each flared end section and pond
overflows (if applicable).
f. Note the size of proposed storm sewer structures.
SWPPP (Sheets C4.5 – C4.6)
19. The proposed project will disturb more than one acre. Develop and include a SWPPP
consistent with the MPCA CSWGP with future plan submittals. Complete.
20. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided
with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to
construction commencing.
21. A detailed review of erosion/sediment control and SWPPP will be conducted with the final
plat submittal.
Utility Plans (Sheet C5.0 – C5.4)
General
22. Any public sanitary sewer and watermain shall be encompassed by drainage and utility
easements where located outside of public road right of way. Drainage and utility
easements will need to allow for a 1:1 trench from the invert of the utility with a minimum
of 20’ centered on the utility.
23. Consider routes for the sewer/watermain that utilize the same tranches and/or connect in
similar locations. For example, make the connection with the proposed watermains at the
same location on Meander utilizing a cross instead of separate tees (easterly
connections). Complete.
24. The general location of existing/proposed watermain and sewer were shown on the
concept plan. With future submittals also show the nearest existing hydrants and valve
locations. Label the pipe size and pipe material for existing/proposed watermain and
sanitary sewer. Complete.
25. Add general notes to the utility plans to the effect of:
City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans & Preliminary Plat – Engineering Review
October 5, 2022
Page 4
K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2022-09-12 Submittal\2022-09-30 Meander Park & Boardwalk FPrelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx
a. The City shall not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that are
associated with variations in the utility as-built elevations. All utility connections
shall be verified in the field.
b. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on
the submitted plans. The Owner and Engineer of Record are fully responsible for
changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City’s
standards.
c. All watermain and sanitary sewer testing shall be conducted in accordance with
the City standards and specifications. Copies of all test results shall be submitted
to the City (Public Works Director, City Engineer), the Owner, and the Engineer
of Record.
d. Watermain shall have a minimum cover of 7.5’.
e. Tracer wire installation shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the MN
Rural Water Association Standards. See these standards for further details.
f. The City will require televising for sanitary sewer pipe installations prior to
accepting a warranty for the utility system; provide report and video files to the
City for review.
26. With final plat submittal provide the following:
a. Plan/profile sheets for watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer along the
townhome access road.
a. Provide dimension notes from watermain to parallel sewer mains (storm and
sanitary sewer); the minimum horizontal separation between mains is 10 feet.
Where watermain crosses storm or sanitary sewer, add a note at each location to
the effect of “Maintain 18” Minimum Separation, 4” Rigid Insulation” on both the
plan view and profile view locations (both utility and storm sewer sheets).
b. Show water/sewer service location to each lot and include the curb stop location
at utility easement location (10’ beyond ROW). For each lot location add the low
floor opening elevation, sewer service station from downstream manhole, sewer
service invert elevation at utility easement (10’ beyond ROW), riser height if
applicable, and curb stop elevation.
Watermain
27. Hydrant locations shall be approved of by the Fire Marshal; typically, a maximum of 250’
influence radius (approximately 400’ spacing) is required to serve the immediate
residential areas. Provide an exhibit showing hydrant influence spacing.
28. Watermain looping connections will be needed to minimize long dead-end watermain
sections. Consideration of further watermain looping needs, stubs for future phases, or
other adjacent developments may be required and will be reviewed with future submittals.
With that in mind, at the southeasterly portion of the site, provide an 8-inch stub to extend
east.
29. The watermain connections to the building(s) shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Fire Marshall. Show the location of the PIV (if sprinklered) and curb stop location on the
plan(s). The City requires that domestic and fire services are separate taps from the
main; A separate curb stop is required for the domestic service and gate valve (PIV) for
the fire line.
City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans & Preliminary Plat – Engineering Review
October 5, 2022
Page 5
K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2022-09-12 Submittal\2022-09-30 Meander Park & Boardwalk FPrelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx
Sanitary Sewer
30. Sanitary sewer main extending to the north into the detached townhome development
area will need to be placed as deep as possible to account for future development
connections to the north.
31. The sewer service shown for the Day Care building should be directed downstream. The
City does not allow service to be connected directly to manholes. Sewer main
entering/existing a manhole should have at least a 90 degree separation where possible;
one of the manholes shown with less than a 90 degreed separation. If the existing
watermain stub will not be used, the City will require that it is removed up to the existing
watermain. Complete.
32. With future submittals show proposed sanitary sewer service line invert elevations on
plans; the City requires a minimum depth of 4’ from low floor elevations. A separate
water/sewer service. Complete.
33. Gravity sewer is being proposed to serve all units within the development. The City’s
typical standard is to place sewer a minimum of 10’ below the surface (18” vertical
separation below the watermain). Where this depth is not feasible, the City will allow an 8’
depth; depths less than 8’ will require review on a case-by-case basis.
Storm Sewer
34. With final construction plans, if basements are proposed with the detached townhomes,
the City will require draintile or other connections for sump pump discharges connecting
to the storm sewer system. A separate foundation pipe system in addition to the sump
discharge system should be considered.
35. Storm sewer stubs are shown on the plan, confirm whether these are for roof drains.
Civil Details (Sheets C6.0 – C6.12)
36. The proposed street and pavement sections should be reviewed and designed by a
geotechnical engineer. Provide soil borings and geotechnical report with final plat
submittal.
37. A full review of standard details will be conducted with the final plat submittal.
Stormwater Management
38. The applicant will need to submit a Stormwater Management Plan and modeling
consistent with Medina’s Stormwater Design Manual.
39. The development will need to meet the City’s volume control requirement to capture and
retain onsite 1.1” of runoff from the net new impervious surface. By satisfying the volume
requirement the water quality requirement is considered met. Follow the City’s
Stormwater Design Manual for alternative credits towards the volume requirement if
infiltration is not feasible. Stormwater treatment will be required north of Meander road
before discharging into the wetland. Complete.
40. Water quality control standards are considered satisfied if the volume control standard for
the site has been met. If it is infeasible to meet the volume control standard due to
contaminated soils, site constraints, or other factors, the proposed BMP will need to
detain and treat a sufficient volume of stormwater to achieve a phosphorus load reduction
of 20% from existing conditions using an approved BMP. Complete.
City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans & Preliminary Plat – Engineering Review
October 5, 2022
Page 6
K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2022-09-12 Submittal\2022-09-30 Meander Park & Boardwalk FPrelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx
41. The applicant may want to consider using the stormwater ponds for irrigation. Credits for
volume control can be given for stormwater reuse. City ordinance does not allow for
municipal water system to be used for irrigation. Re-use for irrigation is being proposed,
however the additional credit is not needed to meet the volume control requirements.
42. The development will need to meet the City’s rate control requirement, which states that
post development discharge rates for the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year Atlas 14 MSE 3,
24-hour storm events must be less than or equal to existing conditions discharge rates.
Complete.
43. The City requires two feet of freeboard from structure low openings to 100-year high
water levels and EOF’s. Provide maintenance access to all ponding facilities
a. Provide EOF routes and HWL for the stormwater BMP’s to verify there is suitable
freeboard.
b. Stabilized EOF’s should be provided for all low areas.
44. Include soil borings to verify that is a minimum of 3’ of separation from the bottom of the
filtration basin to the seasonally saturated soils.
45. Provide size, amount, and slope of proposed drain tile within the filtration basin.
46. The development will need to meet the appropriate watershed standards for Elm Creek
Water Management Commission and the applicant shall submit for the required permits.
47. No private storm water facilities may be approved unless a long-term maintenance plan is
submitted that defines how access will be provided, who will conduct the maintenance,
the type of maintenance and the maintenance intervals. The long-term maintenance plan
along with other stormwater maintenance requirements may have been included with the
project development agreement. The applicant shall obtain all necessary easement or
other property interests to allow access to the facilities for inspection or maintenance for
both the responsible party and the City of Medina.
Traffic & Access
48. Based on the proposed site plan the anticipated traffic generation would be
approximately 3,043 daily trips, 326 AM peak hour trips and 266 PM peak hour trips
assuming the uses outlined in the proposed site plan (venue space, daycare, restaurant,
coffee shop, retail space). The proposed access to the site is located on Meander Road
approximately 470 feet west of Cavanaugh Drive and has an acceptable spacing (greater
than 400 feet).
49. Based on the anticipated traffic generation left and right turn lanes should be provided on
Meander Road at the site access for the commercial site to the south. Also, a two lane
northbound approach should be provided on the south site approach to Meander Road
(left / right turn lanes).
a. The site plan includes a left turn lane into the site and the two-lane northbound
approach from the site. The analysis indicates that the eastbound right turn lane
would not be required for capacity. It should also be looked at with respect to
safety utilizing right turn lane warrant criteria.
50. Only one site access is proposed for the commercial area to the south. With the
anticipated traffic generation from the site, consideration of a secondary access in the
easterly direction which can accommodate the future development area to the east of the
site should be considered. The intention was to extend this internal site roadway up to the
City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans & Preliminary Plat – Engineering Review
October 5, 2022
Page 7
K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2022-09-12 Submittal\2022-09-30 Meander Park & Boardwalk FPrelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx
future Tamarack Drive extension as indicated in the visioning and traffic study completed
in August 2020.
a. A future access to the development area to the east is not included or discussed
with the proposed plan. This should be documented.
51. A traffic analysis should be completed documenting the queuing of vehicles at the site
access to Meander Road. The parking should be located such that it does not interfere
with the queuing of vehicles.
a. A traffic analysis was completed dated September 8, 2022. We have the
following comments on the Traffic and Parking Study:
i. The Capacity and Level of Service worksheets should be provided.
ii. The analysis indicates that the eastbound right turn lane would not be
required for capacity. However, based on the traffic conditions the right
turn lane volume is anticipated to be larger than the Meander Road thru
volume. The need for a right turn lane should also be looked at with
respect to safety utilizing right turn lane warrant criteria.’
iii. The parking demand should be analyzed assuming “Shared Parking”.
This can be completed by evaluating the time-of-day peaking
characteristics of each use found in the ITE Parking Generation Manual.
This may improve the parking needs for the peak events.
iv. Is it reasonable that patrons would walk from the Loram property to the
event center? If so are facilities available to accommodate the pedestrian
movements?
v. Conclusion #4 indicates no roadway improvements. This should be
modified to include the turn lanes assumed (left turn lanes) and identified
in the study (possible right turn lane).
52. A sight line analysis (vertical curves) should be completed at the driveway intersection on
Meander Road. Provide an exhibit.
Wetlands & Environmental
53. Permanent and temporary wetland impacts are proposed. Impacts must be permitted via
the Wetland Conservation Act and the US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404. An
application has been received and is currently incomplete pending proposed mitigation
information.
54. Upland buffers and buffer setbacks will be required for the project. The northern lobe of
Wetland 1, north of Meander Road is classified as a Preserve based on the City’s
functional classification of wetlands and requires an average 35-foot buffer (minimum 25
feet). Buffer shown on the site plan notes 20-foot minimum buffers, which do not meet the
City’s ordinance. Buffers shown on the grading and erosion control sheets do meet the
requirement. Ensure that correct buffers are shown on all applicable plan sheets.
The southern lobes of Wetland 1, south of Meander Road are classified as Manage 2 and
requires 25-foot average buffer (minimum 20-feet). The planned buffer shown meets the
City’s ordinance.
The proposed gazebo is an accessory structure and requires a 5-foot buffer setback. No
planned buffer was shown for the gazebo. Not applicable, gazebo removed from plans.
55. Approved wetland boundaries should be shown on the grading plans or the site plan of
the property. Complete.
City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans & Preliminary Plat – Engineering Review
October 5, 2022
Page 8
K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2022-09-12 Submittal\2022-09-30 Meander Park & Boardwalk FPrelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx
56. Upland Buffer Zones and locations of buffer markers must be shown on the grading plans
or the site plan for the property.
57. The Meander Park & Boardwalk Development Wetland Buffer Memo (dated 9/9/22) notes
that the residential units on the north site would have decks that extend over the upland
buffer zone but would allow for vegetation to grow beneath. City ordinance requires that
upland buffer zones are preserved predominantly in their natural state and alterations,
including mowing, removal of vegetation, or the introduction of non-native vegetation are
prohibited. Homeowners of the proposed residential units must be aware of this
prohibition such that mowing and unapproved plantings do not occur within the upland
buffer zone.
58. Similar to the comment above, the upland buffer zone beneath the proposed
boardwalk/deck area on the southern wetland, should an exemption from the Principal
Structure Setback Buffer requirement be approved, must remain predominantly in its
natural state.
59. Disturbed areas within the upland buffer zone must be seeded with a native seed mix.
The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted
plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or
modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards. With future submittals,
include a response to the comments in this letter.
We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if
you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet.
Sincerely,
WSB
Jim Stremel, P.E.
City Engineer
September 8, 2022
Meander Park & Boardwalk – Medina, MN, by Medina Ventures, LLC
Project Narrative
Meander Park & Boardwalk is a proposed commercial planned unit development located on the north
side of Highway 55, 900 feet east of Arrowhead Drive.
As the over 18-acre site is surrounded by wetlands to the west and to the south, a wetland delineation
was conducted in September of 2021, which revealed approximately 7 acres of developable land on the
site. Access to the site is located at Meander Road on the north side of the main property.
Upon submission of our initial concept plan to the city in December of 2021, Medina Ventures LLC has
since received feedback from the planning commission, parks commission and city council. In addition to
the initial meetings which took place from January 2022-March 2022, there have been multiple
communications between the development team, SRF Consulting Group and the city planning and public
works department.
The site plan has since been updated to incorporate the guidance provided by the City of Medina Parks
and Planning Commission as well as the City Council. Please see the SRF Supplemental Narrative for
more in-depth descriptions on the technical/engineering aspects of the development.
Although, there have been various notable updates to the site plan over the past 6-9 months since the
concept plan was reviewed, the overall intent of Meander Park and Boardwalk remains the same: To
provide a walkable, aesthetically pleasing entertainment and relaxation destination that incorporates
the natural beauty of the land while providing access to desirable amenities that benefit nearby
residents of Medina as well as other surrounding communities.
The proposed development achieves this intent by incorporating unique design features and structural
elements that we believe will add considerable long-term value to city residents, businesses and
surrounding areas while supporting the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and Community Goals.
The Boardwalk
A meandering boardwalk that follows the natural curves of area wetlands while respecting the buffer
zones will create multiple vista points for guests and serve three main purposes for the development.
1. Functionality: Provide site buildings with additional access points if they so choose as well as
greater visibility and opportunities for outdoor seating and/or additional seasonal service and
display areas and opportunities for local businesses and community.
2. Experience and Education: A boardwalk nestled directly adjacent to wetlands create an
immersive experience for guests allowing them to interact with local wildlife and enjoy the
natural beauty of the wetlands as well as be educated about the importance of their
preservation through informational signage.
3. Aesthetic Beauty: A large boardwalk flanking the highly visible south and western portions of
the development creates a unique design aesthetic for the entire development that sets it apart
from the majority of other commercial developments in neighboring suburbs, where asphalt
tends to dominate majority of the public access points.
These three functions directly support multiple parts of the Comprehensive Plan’s community goals,
including preserving rural vistas, open spaces, wetlands and encouraging an attractive, vibrant business
community that complements residential areas of the City. Furthermore, if given prudent consideration,
the boardwalk could at some point be connected to an area trail and park system to help encourage
healthy lifestyles through greater community connectivity of residents.
Green Space, Ponding and Plaza and Water Features
The next unique component of Meander Park & Boardwalk will be to incorporate a large green space as
well as ponding, plazas and water features throughout. The green space located in the southwest corner
via an upland peninsula will feature trees and maintain a natural looking environment with the potential
for park benches and/or a small gathering area. Ponding will be located throughout the development
providing nice visuals and storm water utility. The plazas areas will create nice gathering spaces while
also allowing for potential art sculptures, seasonal displays, temporary retail services or other event
appropriate curated visuals. The addition and strategic placement of natural water features is a critical
component to not only provide environmental beauty but also dampen nearby highway sounds and
mask nearby highway visuals from guests. The green space, ponding, plazas and water features
component also support the Comprehensive Plan’s community goals by preserving and creating serene
open space environments.
The Venue
The anchor of the development will be a sprawling single story (w/basement) arts, education and
entertainment venue. The venue will be majority-owned, financed and run by the developer which will
not only provide a beautiful building on-site, but one that will also attract the type of businesses that a
high-end, venue would lend itself to. The venue will be designed to host a wide variety of events such as
weddings, celebrations of life, corporate events, small musical performances, traditional art and digital
NFT art exhibitions, technology focused educational seminars, metaverse and traditional video gaming
experiences, film screenings, comedy performances, botanical showcases, local fundraisers, fashion
shows, keynote speaking engagements, religious celebrations, and any other cultural and community
driven gatherings. Certain events will be created and produced by the venue owners themselves.
The design of the building will have a focus on form and function with the intent of being able to serve a
wide range of event types and thus attract a larger network of people, businesses and organizations. We
believe the demographics of Medina and the surrounding communities tend to be highly educated,
upper-middle class residents with an increasingly diverse population of religious, racial and ethnic
backgrounds, which this venue would seek to serve through its ability to accommodate the needs of
potential clients, whatever those needs may be. For example, the venue itself will feature a large,
commissary kitchen that will be built to accommodate a variety of pre-approved local restaurants and
caterers in the area. So, whether it be a classic mid-west meat and potatoes party, a private Diwali
celebration or a vegan luncheon, the venue’s business model can provide the necessary flexibility for
every type of pallet. This model is also attractive given the current state of the food service industry and
the desire of many companies within that market to expand or begin to provide off-site catering.
Though the venue will feature various components such as a grand ballroom, bar area, breakout suites
and other modern amenities, we have gone into greater detail on a few examples below to help better
illustrate an overall vision of purposeful thought.
The Venue: Conservatory
If meandering down a boardwalk on a fall Friday afternoon with close friends or seeing a child smile
while snacking on an ice cream cone in summer isn’t enough, imagine walking through an expansive
conservatory on a day with clear blue skies in the heart of a cold Minnesota winter. The conservatory
will add another unique element to Meander Park and Boardwalk and serve more than just one
purpose.
1. The approximately 3,000 square foot, south facing conservatory will serve as an additional
feature to the venue providing a space that adds grandeur to a wedding ceremony, visceral
intimacy to a celebration of life or perhaps just a little humidity and respite from the bitter cold
and dryness of a cold winter’s day.
2. The conservatory will also operate with the intention of being available not just for private
guests to rent out, but to be open to the public on certain occasions throughout the year such as
educational field trips or design focused seminars showcasing unique ways that the venue may
be heated in the winter or cooled during the summer.
3. Given the location of the conservatory in the southwest corner of the development with full
visibility from Highway 55, the conservatory will serve as a stunning visual hallmark of the entire
Meander Park and Boardwalk development.
The Venue: Basement
The basement, like other aspects of the development and venue is created with multiple purposeful
intentions listed below.
1. Storage: The basement will function as a storage area for event rental equipment, furniture,
maintenance supplies and other service equipment that is not always needed for every event.
2. Access: The basement will allow easy and discreet access for building maintenance and utility
service. The basement service road/door will also allow delivery access for box trucks and vans
to and from the venue from various vendors so as to help keep the main parking lot as free as
possible for guests to arrive and park unencumbered.
3. Respite: The basement will provide an area for event staff to take breaks away from the event
as well as the potential for small gatherings of guests if the occasion should arise.
4. Data storage: The basement will also be used to host computers and servers in a cooler
environment while also providing the opportunity to heat to the conservatory and/or other
parts of the building using heat recapture elements.
The venue, it’s adjacent boardwalk, nearby open green space peninsula and conservatory components
also effectively support the community goals of the Comprehensive Plan in similar ways as the previous
elements, especially in the promotion of public and private gathering places and civic events that serve
the entire community.
Mixture of Additional Businesses on Site
Although the developer will not have full control over what businesses decide to call Meander Park &
Boardwalk home, we plan to market directly to the following types of businesses: Family restaurants,
professional offices, cocktail lounges, breweries, indoor/outdoor food halls, daycares, salons, med spas,
bakeries, ice cream shops, toy stores, fast casual food services, boutique fitness facilities, wine/craft
brew shops and/or photography studios.
At this stage, aside from the venue and its components, we have 3 additional building spaces on the site
plan we would like to have occupied by the businesses mentioned above. Our current priority is
attracting both a restaurant and daycare as we feel these two business types are critical to the
development’s overall success. The restaurant is a priority given the large and ongoing demand for
additional dining options in Medina and the daycare to help fill the large need for families with young
children, some who continue to be on waiting lists at several daycare centers throughout the West
Metro. Also, these two businesses in particular help offset parking given the former will see the most
traffic on nights and weekends and the latter on weekdays alone.
North Property Villas
The north side of the development, which is located north of Meander Road and just west of the Fields
of Medina neighborhood, is zoned Low Density Residential with some parts already described in the Site
Plan section of the SRF Supplemental Narrative will feature 4 modern villas with walkout basements and
rooftop terraces. The modern villas architecture are inspired to compliment the design of the venue,
while also providing the guests who stay there, a unique getaway experience unlike most anything the
area has to offer in terms of conventional lodging options. Furthermore, the villas will be constructed to
take full advantage of the sweeping views and gorgeous sunsets taking place across the protected
wetlands to the west. By developing the north and south properties at the same time, the timing impact
of construction operations could be minimized and provide a better economy of scale for the entire
project. Especially considering the sewer and water connections that will be required on both sides of
Meander Road.
www.srfconsulting.com
3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 | 763.475.0010
Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer
September 7th, 2022
Meander Park and Boardwalk
SRF supplemental narrative sections for site / civil / landscape / wetland / traffic
Overview
Meander Park and Boardwalk is a project located at 1472 State Highway 55, Medina, MN 55340, in
the northeast quadrant of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive. The property and development spans
over two parcels, split by Meander Road, highlighted by an Event Venue and surrounding
commercial on the south parcel, along with a small number of residential duplexes on the north
parcel. City of Medina has provided informal review and comments through a Concept PUD
submittal during the first half of 2022, along with follow-up communication to provide development
guidance.
Zoning
Existing zoning for the north parcel is RR-UR, Rural Residential Urban Reserve and the south
parcel is CH, Commercial Highway. The parcels are being rezoned PUD, Planned Unit
Development, to help provide review of the project to address flexibility for some non-conforming
code requirements while enhancing other aspects of the project. Although rezoning to PUD, the
north parcel is generally guided for R2, Residential, zoning and the south parcel is generally for CH,
Commercial Highway zoning.
Existing Conditions / Removals
Although the total property is around 18.43 acres (north=10.15 acres, south = 8.28 acres) in size, a
large wetland reduces the developable area (non-wetland) to 7.29 acres (north=1.61 acres,
south=5.68), thus maximizing development potential for the limited upland area is important for he
success of he project.
Meander Road is a 2-lane local collector city street with a rural section including side shoulders and
surface drainage to the property and wetland and splits the properties. The road and properties have
a noticeable slope from east to west down to the wetland. The north property is an undeveloped
grassy field with little tree growth, dominated by wetlands. The south property contains a low
maintained old farmstead with an old barn and other accessory structures still standing, an active
well, but no house. It also has a fair amount of volunteer trees along the perimeter of the upland
area, but also dominated by wetlands, primarily to the west and south. The area north and east of
the development is primarily wetland with Highway 55 to the south. The east perimeter has a small
Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022
Client Page 2
60’ wide parcel that contains a gravel driveway access to a single resident farmstead and aerial
utilities, however the south portion of the driveway has been abandon since Meander Road was
developed. To the northeast of this 60’ corridor sits a new residential single family subdivision and
to the southeast lays an undeveloped farm field slated for commercial.
In general, the upland areas will contain typical land disturbance for development along with an
adjacent new urban street and trail. Most of the existing volunteer trees and old structures will be
removed, but the well may be reused for supplemental water for irrigation.
Site Plan
The development has a certain architectural look but in general is designed to be a comprehensive
project with rental residential villas allowing wedding and event parties to lodge adjacent to the
Event Venue, while the other commercial uses complement each other to share a commercial
parking lot. A mix of retail, restaurant, and day care uses provide diversity of demand throughout
the day, that helps provide adequate parking without over building. The distinguishing element that
highlights the project is the elevated boardwalk at the back side of the Event Venue, Retail, and
Restaurant buildings. This provides wetland views while providing other outdoor gathering areas
and building access while minimizing impacts adjacent to the wetland upland buffer.
The residential development will be a pair of duplexes, totaling 4 units, serviced through a shared
private driveway with each unit having two levels, 2-car garage, lower-level rear walkout, and upper
level deck on the back.
Commercial buildings are typical single-story structures, with the exception of the Event Venue that
will also have a smaller footprint lower-level basement for storage and data center, complete with a
concrete pavement service route under the rear boardwalk. Sidewalks will be provided around the
primary sides of the parking, along with a route through the parking lot, connecting the buildings to
the parking and to the Meander Road Trail. There is a peninsula area in the southwest corner of the
south parcel that at one time had property amenities proposed, but currently has been eliminated
and does not have any improvement identified at this time. The Event Venue is looking at
implementing a landscape water feature of waterfalls and koi ponds with enhanced landscaping to
help complement the aesthetic appeal to the development. See the Site Plan sheets for additional
information.
Preliminary Plat
The property will be subdivided into lots to represent possible sale and ownership of certain aspects
of the development. The north area will have four small, attached housing residential lots around
the buildings, with a common outlot owned by a Home Owners Association, or similar. Although
the residential units are initially intended for rental, the platting is preparing it for sale, if this changes
to individual unit ownership. The north parcel will provide typical commercial parcels for the day
care, retail, and restaurant buildings and related parking, while the Event Venue will retain
ownership of the rest of the site, including the storm basins and wetland areas. You will find
additional info, including Drainage and Utility Easements on the Preliminary Plat sheets.
Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022
Client Page 3
Access, Traffic, and Parking
During concept PUD stage, the commercial driveway access was directed by the city to locate as far
west as possible to provide better intersection spacing from the Meander Road / Cavanaugh Drive
residential intersection to the east. Also, concept design originally indicated that the residential
private driveway was opposite the commercial driveway, but City staff indicated that this should be
relocated more to the east to reduce the long driveway and unnecessary improvements, while
lessening the conflicts with the new left turn lane. Currently, the private drive is adjacent to the
existing resident gravel driveway, just east of the property, but with very low traffic volumes coming
from these two driveways, it appears to be an acceptable location.
Meander Road, adjacent to the development, was directed to convert from a rural section to a curb
and gutter urban section, complete with a parallel city trail extension and related boulevard. The
commercial site will require a west bound left turn lane along Meander Road to help reduce traffic
congestion, however the east bound traffic projections indicate that a right turn lane into the
commercial site is unnecessary, including future development projections from the Tamarack Road
study. The left turn lane does not have enough distance to meet MNDOT standards, so a layout to
provide the best stacking, taper, and residential driveway access was provided.
Shared parking has become more common, and the development is utilizing this trend to provide an
appropriate parking lot, without over building it. The commercial buildings provide a compliment
of different uses, with different demands to provide a working solution. When events reach a
certain size, then off-site parking would most likely be required.
The SRF Traffic study provide additional detail on Meander Road traffic data for turn lanes and a
shared parking table indicating typical peak and 85% maximum peak ranges for parking demand.
Grading Drainage and Erosion Control
Grading of the properties generally includes typical commercial and residential standards with
buildings and parking draining to inlets that lead to storm basins, that ultimately discharge to the
wetlands. Efforts have been made to reduce grading in the wetland upland buffer areas and
temporary erosion control has been provided per MPCA NPDES standards. It should be noted
that the wetland floodplain elevation of 986.0’ was impacted within the north parcel area, but
compensatory volume storage was provided in the south development area. See Grading, Drainage,
and Erosion Control plans.
Stormwater
The site primarily captures impervious surface stormwater runoff through storm inlets and
underground piping to Stormwater BMPs and is designed to meet the regulations through cistern
event center roof reuse water for irrigation, underground storm chambers, and surface basins,
Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022
Client Page 4
ultimately discharging to the adjacent wetland. See the Grading and Storm Sewer Plans, along with
the SRF Stormwater Report for more information.
Utilities
Sanitary sewer connection is provided on the north side of Meander Road, by the existing westerly
residential lot, east of the gravel driveway, and watermain is basically available along the north side
of Meander Road. Both the commercial and residential properties provide city owned main lines for
sanitary sewer and watermain throughout the development within Drainage and Utility Easements,
to allow the building service connections. Other utilities appear to be in the area, but not illustrated.
See Utility Plan and Preliminary Plat sheets for more information.
Tree Preservation / Landscape / Irrigation
There are many existing significant volunteer trees being removed on site and have indicated that
many are exempt from mitigation. Although not clearly defined, additional landscaping is provided
for any required tree removal mitigation.
Landscape design is basically providing native seed mixes along the wetland edge, sod around the
parking and buildings, and a robust combination of trees, shrubs, and perennials in many of the
remaining area of the parking and building areas.
Irrigation will be design-build and irrigate the sod and planting areas but leave the native seed areas
unirrigated. The irrigation system is to utilize the reuse event center roof rain water via a cistern,
with supplemental water coming from the existing well on site.
See Tree Preservation and Landscape Plan sheets for more information.
Wetland
Public improvements of Meander Road, city trail, and commercial driveway improvements have
developed wetland impact. Currently wetland mitigation is scheduled through cash purchase
available through banking credits. It should be noted that the project’s floodplain compensatory
storage improvement does disturb the wetland area, but is viewed as a temporary impact, as it is
restoring the wetland, and unclear if this would also qualify for on-site wetland mitigation for other
areas. See SRF WCA application.
Wetland Upland Buffer Average line has been provided on the project, providing the minimum
setback, and average. In addition, the buildings have been placed outside of the Wetland Upland
Buffer and the additional 15’ Primary Structure setback. The elevated decks and boardwalks are
outside of the Wetland Upland Buffer, but within the Primary Structure setback, but indicate the
need for flexibility that they are not a primary structure and providing some mitigation items. See
SRF Wetland Buffer memo.
www.srfconsulting.com
3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 | 763.475.0010
Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer
September 7th, 2022
Meander Park and Boardwalk
SRF supplemental narrative sections for site / civil / landscape / wetland / traffic
Overview
Meander Park and Boardwalk is a project located at 1472 State Highway 55, Medina, MN 55340, in
the northeast quadrant of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive. The property and development spans
over two parcels, split by Meander Road, highlighted by an Event Venue and surrounding
commercial on the south parcel, along with a small number of residential duplexes on the north
parcel. City of Medina has provided informal review and comments through a Concept PUD
submittal during the first half of 2022, along with follow-up communication to provide development
guidance.
Zoning
Existing zoning for the north parcel is RR-UR, Rural Residential Urban Reserve and the south
parcel is CH, Commercial Highway. The parcels are being rezoned PUD, Planned Unit
Development, to help provide review of the project to address flexibility for some non-conforming
code requirements while enhancing other aspects of the project. Although rezoning to PUD, the
north parcel is generally guided for R2, Residential, zoning and the south parcel is generally for CH,
Commercial Highway zoning.
Existing Conditions / Removals
Although the total property is around 18.43 acres (north=10.15 acres, south = 8.28 acres) in size, a
large wetland reduces the developable area (non-wetland) to 7.29 acres (north=1.61 acres,
south=5.68), thus maximizing development potential for the limited upland area is important for he
success of he project.
Meander Road is a 2-lane local collector city street with a rural section including side shoulders and
surface drainage to the property and wetland and splits the properties. The road and properties have
a noticeable slope from east to west down to the wetland. The north property is an undeveloped
grassy field with little tree growth, dominated by wetlands. The south property contains a low
maintained old farmstead with an old barn and other accessory structures still standing, an active
well, but no house. It also has a fair amount of volunteer trees along the perimeter of the upland
area, but also dominated by wetlands, primarily to the west and south. The area north and east of
the development is primarily wetland with Highway 55 to the south. The east perimeter has a small
Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022
Client Page 2
60’ wide parcel that contains a gravel driveway access to a single resident farmstead and aerial
utilities, however the south portion of the driveway has been abandon since Meander Road was
developed. To the northeast of this 60’ corridor sits a new residential single family subdivision and
to the southeast lays an undeveloped farm field slated for commercial.
In general, the upland areas will contain typical land disturbance for development along with an
adjacent new urban street and trail. Most of the existing volunteer trees and old structures will be
removed, but the well may be reused for supplemental water for irrigation.
Site Plan
The development has a certain architectural look but in general is designed to be a comprehensive
project with rental residential villas allowing wedding and event parties to lodge adjacent to the
Event Venue, while the other commercial uses complement each other to share a commercial
parking lot. A mix of retail, restaurant, and day care uses provide diversity of demand throughout
the day, that helps provide adequate parking without over building. The distinguishing element that
highlights the project is the elevated boardwalk at the back side of the Event Venue, Retail, and
Restaurant buildings. This provides wetland views while providing other outdoor gathering areas
and building access while minimizing impacts adjacent to the wetland upland buffer.
The residential development will be a pair of duplexes, totaling 4 units, serviced through a shared
private driveway with each unit having two levels, 2-car garage, lower-level rear walkout, and upper
level deck on the back.
Commercial buildings are typical single-story structures, with the exception of the Event Venue that
will also have a smaller footprint lower-level basement for storage and data center, complete with a
concrete pavement service route under the rear boardwalk. Sidewalks will be provided around the
primary sides of the parking, along with a route through the parking lot, connecting the buildings to
the parking and to the Meander Road Trail. There is a peninsula area in the southwest corner of the
south parcel that at one time had property amenities proposed, but currently has been eliminated
and does not have any improvement identified at this time. The Event Venue is looking at
implementing a landscape water feature of waterfalls and koi ponds with enhanced landscaping to
help complement the aesthetic appeal to the development. See the Site Plan sheets for additional
information.
Preliminary Plat
The property will be subdivided into lots to represent possible sale and ownership of certain aspects
of the development. The north area will have four small, attached housing residential lots around
the buildings, with a common outlot owned by a Home Owners Association, or similar. Although
the residential units are initially intended for rental, the platting is preparing it for sale, if this changes
to individual unit ownership. The north parcel will provide typical commercial parcels for the day
care, retail, and restaurant buildings and related parking, while the Event Venue will retain
ownership of the rest of the site, including the storm basins and wetland areas. You will find
additional info, including Drainage and Utility Easements on the Preliminary Plat sheets.
Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022
Client Page 3
Access, Traffic, and Parking
During concept PUD stage, the commercial driveway access was directed by the city to locate as far
west as possible to provide better intersection spacing from the Meander Road / Cavanaugh Drive
residential intersection to the east. Also, concept design originally indicated that the residential
private driveway was opposite the commercial driveway, but City staff indicated that this should be
relocated more to the east to reduce the long driveway and unnecessary improvements, while
lessening the conflicts with the new left turn lane. Currently, the private drive is adjacent to the
existing resident gravel driveway, just east of the property, but with very low traffic volumes coming
from these two driveways, it appears to be an acceptable location.
Meander Road, adjacent to the development, was directed to convert from a rural section to a curb
and gutter urban section, complete with a parallel city trail extension and related boulevard. The
commercial site will require a west bound left turn lane along Meander Road to help reduce traffic
congestion, however the east bound traffic projections indicate that a right turn lane into the
commercial site is unnecessary, including future development projections from the Tamarack Road
study. The left turn lane does not have enough distance to meet MNDOT standards, so a layout to
provide the best stacking, taper, and residential driveway access was provided.
Shared parking has become more common, and the development is utilizing this trend to provide an
appropriate parking lot, without over building it. The commercial buildings provide a compliment
of different uses, with different demands to provide a working solution. When events reach a
certain size, then off-site parking would most likely be required.
The SRF Traffic study provide additional detail on Meander Road traffic data for turn lanes and a
shared parking table indicating typical peak and 85% maximum peak ranges for parking demand.
Grading Drainage and Erosion Control
Grading of the properties generally includes typical commercial and residential standards with
buildings and parking draining to inlets that lead to storm basins, that ultimately discharge to the
wetlands. Efforts have been made to reduce grading in the wetland upland buffer areas and
temporary erosion control has been provided per MPCA NPDES standards. It should be noted
that the wetland floodplain elevation of 986.0’ was impacted within the north parcel area, but
compensatory volume storage was provided in the south development area. See Grading, Drainage,
and Erosion Control plans.
Stormwater
The site primarily captures impervious surface stormwater runoff through storm inlets and
underground piping to Stormwater BMPs and is designed to meet the regulations through cistern
event center roof reuse water for irrigation, underground storm chambers, and surface basins,
Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022
Client Page 4
ultimately discharging to the adjacent wetland. See the Grading and Storm Sewer Plans, along with
the SRF Stormwater Report for more information.
Utilities
Sanitary sewer connection is provided on the north side of Meander Road, by the existing westerly
residential lot, east of the gravel driveway, and watermain is basically available along the north side
of Meander Road. Both the commercial and residential properties provide city owned main lines for
sanitary sewer and watermain throughout the development within Drainage and Utility Easements,
to allow the building service connections. Other utilities appear to be in the area, but not illustrated.
See Utility Plan and Preliminary Plat sheets for more information.
Tree Preservation / Landscape / Irrigation
There are many existing significant volunteer trees being removed on site and have indicated that
many are exempt from mitigation. Although not clearly defined, additional landscaping is provided
for any required tree removal mitigation.
Landscape design is basically providing native seed mixes along the wetland edge, sod around the
parking and buildings, and a robust combination of trees, shrubs, and perennials in many of the
remaining area of the parking and building areas.
Irrigation will be design-build and irrigate the sod and planting areas but leave the native seed areas
unirrigated. The irrigation system is to utilize the reuse event center roof rain water via a cistern,
with supplemental water coming from the existing well on site.
See Tree Preservation and Landscape Plan sheets for more information.
Wetland
Public improvements of Meander Road, city trail, and commercial driveway improvements have
developed wetland impact. Currently wetland mitigation is scheduled through cash purchase
available through banking credits. It should be noted that the project’s floodplain compensatory
storage improvement does disturb the wetland area, but is viewed as a temporary impact, as it is
restoring the wetland, and unclear if this would also qualify for on-site wetland mitigation for other
areas. See SRF WCA application.
Wetland Upland Buffer Average line has been provided on the project, providing the minimum
setback, and average. In addition, the buildings have been placed outside of the Wetland Upland
Buffer and the additional 15’ Primary Structure setback. The elevated decks and boardwalks are
outside of the Wetland Upland Buffer, but within the Primary Structure setback, but indicate the
need for flexibility that they are not a primary structure and providing some mitigation items. See
SRF Wetland Buffer memo.
Planned Unit Development Flexibility Summary Supplement
Meander Park and Boardwalk Development
11/04/2022
1. Residential 20% Density Bonus Increase
We are requesting flexibility on residential density for the north parcel, as the city can grant an additional 20%
residential bonus density. The R-2 PUD guided zoning indicates a density range of 2-3 units per acre, thus we
are asking for 3 units per acre, plus 20% bonus density, for new density maximum range of 3.6 units per acre. It
is the goal of the project to provide two sets of twin homes totaling four units, on this small parcel of land that
involves significant wetlands. It is our understanding that the City of Medina bases the density on land that
excludes not only wetland, but also wetland upland buffer. To achieve the four units, the property needs a
minimum of 1.2 acres of land per 3.6 units per acre density. The north parcel also needs some flexibility in
wetland upland buffers to make the 1.2 acres obtainable, which is further described in the next PUD flexibility
item.
In summary, the density bonus is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and would benefit this small and
challenging parcel with four units planned for the project. Although we respect the City of Medina’s perspective
on excluding wetland and wetland upland buffer for density calculation, not every community views this in the
same way, and feel that the project’s north parcel is significantly hindered by this interpretation but have
proposed a solution with the help of our PUD flexibility request.
2. Residential Minimum Wetland Upland Buffer Zone Width Setback and Area Distribution
We are requesting flexibility on minimum wetland upland buffer setbacks for the north parcel residential
development area and for redistribution of the wetland upland buffer area from the north parcel to the south
parcel. Both requests are tied to the previous flexibility item above to obtain the proper residential density
maximum due to the wetland upland buffer land area not included in the unit density calculation.
The north wetland is classified as Preserve, which technically requires a 30 foot minimum with 50 foot average,
however City staff has indicated that upon further review, the DNR mapped area is over 1,000 feet away and
that a 35 foot average would be acceptable.
The first request is to provide a minimum of 17 feet for the minimum wetland upland buffer width setback along
the residential north parcel development. This is primarily to provide the appropriate wetland upland buffer
area to allow the land area for the desired residential density. With the wetland buffer average being reduced,
we are requesting some reduction in the buffer width as well. City staff has indicated concern of having the
wetland upland buffer too close to the back yards of the residential units, so this reduced buffer width from 30
feet to 17 feet provides a little more space to each unit, and to help prevent future buffer encroachment, a split
rail fence is being added at this boundary to control lawn mowing maintenance and impacts, to provide a more
permanent marker.
Although unclear if needed, we are also asking that the elevated residential decks not be considered a structure
and not adhere to the buffer structure setbacks, as it is significantly elevated at the upper level of the residence
and would allow rainwater through gaps in the typical decking surface and allow enough sunlight for vegetation
to grow below.
The second request is for flexibility to redistribute about 10,000 SF of the required north parcel wetland buffer
average area to the south parcel. The total required buffer average is still achieved between the two parcels,
but to provide the north property residential land area for the density requested, we are moving the designated
area to the south property, where there is more room for this item.
It is our approach to still provide the spirit of the wetland buffers but are offering a creative solution for
flexibility approval to allow integration of other elements into the project, thus the purpose of the Planned Unit
Development application.
3. Water Feature Commercial Minimum Upland Buffer Zone Width
We are requesting flexibility for minimum upland buffer zone width to build a landscape water feature adjacent
to the wetland buffer zone on the southwest corner of the development. This water feature is a critical
component of the development as it will provide the necessary visual and audible screening for venue guests at
the venue, while mutually creating a beautiful aesthetic for those driving past the venue on Highway 55. The
specific location of the water feature was strategically chosen given its close proximity to the conservatory
portion of the venue where guests of the venue will be getting married among other ceremonious occasions.
The water feature will provide guests inside the conservatory a beautiful backdrop of a waterfall and guests
outside the conservatory on the boardwalk, the serene sound of water percolating into a holding pond thus
masking the sound of cars driving by at 55 miles per hour. Given the chosen location of the conservatory to be
south facing and the limited amount of upland in that area, placing the water feature within the buffer zone is
the only practical place to put it. Furthermore, we may choose to inscribe the main highway signage for the
venue on the water feature’s southwest outer face.
In summary, placing the water feature in this critical area will provide a secluded oasis experience – a grotto per
se - for those within the venue and when combined with the conservatory as a backdrop, create a landmark
visual in Medina to rival any development along the Highway 55 corridor west of the Twin Cities.
Water feature height is expected to be approximately 15’ tall to accommodate for the area’s boardwalk height
of 6’ to 9’ tall, screening element for guests inside and outside the venue. It will require a base size of between
30’-40’ to support that height given the splash radius and structural integrity. A portion of the 30’-40’ base width
can be tucked underneath the boardwalk where we intend to have a holding pond with koi fish. The overall
length of the boardwalk will be approximately 65’. The materials used in the water feature will be a mix of
natural boulders, preformed concrete, fountain mechanicals, and additional landscaping such as pockets of
plants incorporated throughout to achieve a truly natural aesthetic and feel.
The south wetland is classified as Manage 2 and indicates a Minimum Upland Buffer Zone Width of 20 feet and
to be in a natural state, via a native seed mix. Technically there is a minimum of 20 feet of area between the
delineated wetland boundary and the edge of the elevated boardwalk, however, City staff indicated concern
about the landscape water feature not fully defined as an element within the native buffer, so requested that
the water feature be located outside of the upland buffer and reduce the minimum buffer zone in this area. To
help resolve, we are requesting flexibility to move the buffer setback line to 2’ to allow the necessary area for
the landscape water feature. As a supplemental note, the project’s proposed Wetland Average Upland Buffer
boundary area exceeds the existing area, as noted in the Wetland Upland Buffer Summary and shown on the
Overall Site Plan Sheet. It should also be noted that in the Wetland Buffer Memo, we are also providing some
mitigation of the reduced setback by providing removal of non-native species in the upland buffer area and
planting native vegetation through a seed mix, adding more desirable trees to the site, and providing
interpretive signage that explains the importance of wetlands and upland buffer areas at the commercial
boardwalk area.
Although unclear if needed, we are also asking that the elevated commercial boardwalk not be considered a
structure and not adhere to the buffer structure setbacks, as it is significantly elevated at the upper level of the
commercial building and would allow rain water through gaps in the typical decking surface and allow enough
sunlight for vegetation to grow below.
4. Parking Lot Landscape Islands
We are requesting flexibility on the south parking lot landscape percentage and the layout of landscape islands
to break up the parking lot to minimize the expanse. The first request is to receive flexibility to reduce the
parking landscape island percentage from 8% to 5%. Due to the significant area of wetlands (an existing
landscape feature) on the property, the developable area and parking is limited and has little room to reduce
parking to accommodate. It is also noted that there is a pedestrian sidewalk system through the center of the
parking lot going north-south, that is not included in the calculation, which would help increase this percentage
if counted. To help compensate, the islands are also significantly landscaped with trees and perennial plants to
increase the landscape appearance in the parking areas. The second flexibility request is to accept the parking
landscape islands as proposed, that are already added from the concept plan to help break up the expanse of
the parking lot. The parking lot area is limited and is not that large at 231 spaces compared to the Medina
Target that exceeds 500 spaces. There is no desire to add more landscape islands as this limits the flexibility of
the parking lot to be used for Event valet stacking of parking and feel that the current layout provides an
appropriate level of landscape to break up this limited parking area.
5. Day Care Building Setback
We are requesting a 12’ setback from the right-of-way boundary to our proposed daycare building vs the 25’
setback the city code standard. Given the limited buildable space of the site and desire to accommodate the
right mix of business uses on the overall vision of Meander Park and Boardwalk, we hope this can be
accommodated through our Planned Unit Development. If the daycare building becomes too small, it is less
likely to attract a viable daycare provider, which we believe would otherwise positively benefit the growing
demand from young families moving into the area. The intent is to angle the building parallel to the parking lot
and have a corner of the building reach this 12’ setback (not the entire side of the structure) which opens up
more triangle space for the day care play equipment in the play area.
6. Parking
Although we believe the 231 parking spaces is sufficient to accommodate the business uses proposed, there
may be some occasions where events exceed the 300 or so guests at the venue and have an agreement with
Loram Maintenance of Way, located at the southeast quadrant of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive, for
additional parking on the weeknights and weekends via a shuttle service that the owner/operator of the venue
would provide. Furthermore, given the parking for the proposed daycare will likely only operate during normal
daytime business hours Monday-Friday, we intend to utilize those parking spaces via a valet service during
weekend events. By using a valet service, we have the ability to “double park” most of the spaces, thus gaining
at least an additional 50 parking spaces and potentially more given the wide parking aisle near the north side of
the daycare parking area. It should be noted that even though the Event Venue has 300 seats in both the
conservatory and ballroom, it typically is used for the same 300-person event, such as the ceremony in one and
reception in the other for the same crowd. The SRF Traffic and Parking Study has summarized that almost all
100-person, 200-person, and 300-person (weekends) events can accommodate enough parking on site during an
average event, when planned properly with other uses on site. Based on the parking study and plans for off-site
parking, via shuttle, it is our request for flexibility in parking space minimum requirements as part of our Planned
Unit Development, as the shared parking concept with different demand uses and off-site parking options for
larger events, provide the necessary parking for the development.
7. Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape
The existing trees on the property are generally considered more of a pioneering tree species that have grown
during the life of the previous farmstead, and not considered part of a woodland community or has any special
natural interest. City Code indicates that the “control of pioneering Tree species” are exempt from the
mitigation requirements, thus we are requesting that the removal of all of these trees are exempt from any tree
preservation or replacement requirements as part of the flexibility of our Planned Unit Development. It should
be noted that the landscape plan does provide some mitigation of the loss of existing trees by exceeding the
minimum requirements for trees and shrubs/perennials to help provide an appropriate and attractive
landscape.
8. Residential Units for Lodging
The north residential units (villas) are to complement the Event Venue by providing rental lodging for guests,
such as a wedding party, family, friends, or general travelers. It is the request of this project, as part of the
Planned Unit Development, that flexibility be provided to recognize these units as lodging rental use homes, and
not strictly as permanent single family residential homes. The property and units will be setup under one
common management, like a Home-Owners-Association (HOA) to take care of the grounds and buildings, such
as lawn mowing, snow removal, and maintenance.
612.388.66222324 Brewster Street
St. Paul, MN 55108 info@VillamilArchitecture.com
\//\
\//\VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
11/02/22
Page 1 of 3
PUD Submittal
Meander Park and Boardwalk
Architectural Narrative
Building Materials
Meander Park and Boardwalk has a mix of uses that share a natural building material palette. The materiality of the
buildings is one of natural products that exemplify the natural beauty and wear of what the natural environment provides.
This is most easily understood as wood and stone, but in this case also encompasses the common construction materials
that we have come to know as the basic building materials developed in the industrial revolution. These man made
materials are concrete, and metal. The use of all of these materials share in a concept of showing the simple natural beauty
of what can be achieved through their use architecturally. The category of real natural materials goes beyond the initial
appearance of a newly built building and includes the aesthetic these materials provide as they get used and start to show
wear and the natural process of an aging material. These types of materials often do not need to be painted to achieve an
acceptable durability and beauty, and can be stained, sealed, or in the case of steel blackened using heat. The use of
Corten steel as a facade material starts out looking like ordinary untreated metal, and the beauty of its final appearance
begins through an oxidation process as it ages. The metal takes on a rusty appearance that is its natural beauty and also
the reason it is protected from the elements. Sealing this material is only optional as the natural deep rust color is all it
needs to last for centuries. The use of concrete should exemplify its qualities of the process of construction used to erect it.
This can be illustrated as board formed concrete that shows the imprinting of the boards used in the construction of the
formwork, or the exposed form tie holes left by a smoother square patterned formwork.
Venue
This building is composed of three parts: Conservatory, Kitchen/Lounge, and Ballroom. These three parts of the building
have a distinct character that breaks the long facade. They assemble in a manner where they connect seamlessly to one
another yet create a visually appealing mix of different materialities. There are elements that carry throughout the building
like the tall black framed doors, and other black metal accents. The boardwalk is the main feature tying the west facade
together with large green planing walls that add a layering to the back of the building overlooking the wetlands.
The Conservatory is almost entirely glass and shares a stone wall with the adjacent Kitchen/Lounge. The glass is framed
with a black metal frame.
The Kitchen and Lounge have a white tile, and black brick facade, respectively.
The Ballroom is entirely clad with a natural vertical gapped wood facade.
The west side of the building has a walkout basement with a boardwalk above that wraps the backside of the building
connecting all the spaces. The basement walls are board formed concrete.
The Basement is a walkout made of concrete walls.
Wood: (Min 25% - Max 35%)Brick/Tile: (Min 10% - Max 20%)Stone: (Min 2% - Max 6%)
Concrete: (Min 15% - Max 25%)Glazing: (Min 25% - Max 35%)
West Elevation
612.388.66222324 Brewster Street
St. Paul, MN 55108 info@VillamilArchitecture.com
\//\
\//\VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
11/02/22
Page 2 of 3
PUD Submittal
Mall
The Mall runs parallel to HWY 55 and has two faces to it: the South-facing HWY 55, and the North-facing parking off of
Meander Rd. The shops at Meander Park and Boardwalk utilize both North and South storefronts as active points of
entrance for the public. The South storefronts are all connected to the boardwalk that continues to the Venue and produces
a lively southerly sun lit area that connects to buildings to the slice of wetlands that runs in between the main thoroughfare
of HWY 55. The South facade acts as a main storefront for signage and public activities. Both sides of the building share the
same material choices and create a cohesive material palette across the North and South elevations identifying the strip mall
as one row of shops that are a collective. At the same time as identifying as one row of shops they need to have distinctive
materiality from the neighboring store. The different material choices should be simplified down to just a few, and alternate
every other shop's elevation. The entries of the shops are an element that is shared across the storefronts.
The Windows of all the buildings should be of the highest quality, meeting at a minimum of the standard commercial quality
standards. The fenestrations are an important part of the appearance of the facade and overall architectural appearance.
The doors and windows should be a minimum of eight feet in height and cover a significant portion of the facades creating
a very transparent appearance breaking up all portions of the walls that are a storefront face of the building. The South
storefronts should run glazing down to the finished floor. The horizontal partitioning of the windows should not obstruct the
lower eight feet of the glazing systems creating large unobstructed views only broken by the vertical structure of the
windows.
Wood: (Min 25% - Max 35%)
Restaurant
The standalone building furthest to the East should share in the patterning of the strip malls facades and be broken up by
using at a minimum two distinct materials. This building should also share in the entry style of the adjacent strip mall
having tall glass doors.
Wood: (Min 15% - Max 40%)
South Elevation
South Elevation
Corten: (Min 25% - Max 35%)Concrete: (Min 15% - Max 25%)
Glazing (Min 25% - Max 30%)
Concrete: (Min 50% - Max 85%)
Glazing (Min 25% - Max 30%)
612.388.66222324 Brewster Street
St. Paul, MN 55108 info@VillamilArchitecture.com
\//\
\//\VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
11/02/22
Page 3 of 3
PUD Submittal
Daycare
The Daycare is a representation of a simple historical schoolhouse. This iconic shape is reminiscent of a classical gable
faced roof with dormers that was utilized by the settlers of the US. The wood horizontal siding covers the majority of the
facade with accents created through fenestrations and entry points.
Residence
The residence facade is a rustic wood run vertically. The entry and garage door provide accents of a brighter clean smooth
wood facade. The deck and fenestrations accent a black metal finish.
North Elevation
East Elevation
Wood: (Min 70% - Max 80%)Stone: (Min 5% - Max 10%)
Glazing (Min 10% - Max 20%)
Wood: (Min 80% - Max 90%)Glazing (Min 10% - Max 25%)
Conservatory Close Up South Conservatory Close Up South Night
Boardwalk Convervatory South View On Boardwalk Looking Southwest Boardwalk NightBoardwalk View Facing East
Boardwalk View
Coming Down Boardwalk WestLooking Down from Boardwalk
Conservatory View Facing Out South View from Highway 55 1
View from Highway 55 2
View from Highway 55 1 Night
View from Highway 55 2 Night
Southwest Water Feature
Design Board
Meander Park & Boardwalk
Designed for decorative lighting, Lampion is a cylindrical lamp with a customizable perforated cage
made of stainless steel, suspended under an aluminum electrical housing. To restore ambient lighting,
the luminaire is equipped with a IP66 48 LED module and a driver integrated into the cage, measuring
26 inches high and 16 inches in diameter (Lampion Modern). Equipped with a discreet locking
mechanism and tool-less entry for maintenance. This Class I and II luminaire is a mood creator thanks
to the play of lights produced by the optional customizable cutting patterns. Also available in a backlit
version, this new interpretation called Lampion Glow enhances its aesthetics and gives it a unique visual
rendering.
www.ragni-lighting.com
AM
B
I
A
N
C
E
| DEC
O
R
A
T
I
V
E
LIG
H
T
I
N
G
| LA
M
P
I
O
N
Ø16
26
1’’GAZ male
Weight (Ibs)23
2.85
Protection index (Electrical h ousing)IP 54
Shock resistance (Body)IK 10
Materials : Electrical h ousing
Cage
Aluminum
Stainless steel
Dimensions (in)
Surge protector or over/under voltage protection
Possibility of lighting management (control, automatic lowering of intensity etc.)
NTC sensor
Photocell
Customization:
LAMPION MODERN
OPTIONS
Inlay of a customization element (logo,
city coat of arms, decorative pattern)
within the cage after a feasibility study
by our technical service.
Two-tone declination (different shade
between the cage and the electrical
housing).
AM
B
I
A
N
C
E
| DEC
O
R
A
T
I
V
E
LIG
H
T
I
N
G
| LA
M
P
I
O
N
www.ragni-lighting.com
EPA (ft2)
Variations of
ensembles
AMBIANCE I DECORATIVE LIGHTING I LAMPION
LAMPION GLOW
ROME 100 -JIMA 400
Al
LRwww.ragni-lighting.com
BI
LAMPION
HELIS 100 - CYL 350
C
1 LAMPION
ROME 100 - JIMA 500
RES
UNIT 1
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 2
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 3
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 4
1800 SF
RESTAURANT
4,975 SF
PLAY AREA
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
PLAY AREA
EVENT VENUE
15,150 SF
PLUS
6,996 SF
BASEMENT
(STORAGE /
DATA CENTER)
RETAIL
9,600 SF
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
PRIVATE DRIVE
MBMBMBMB
TR
E
E
*
7
8
TR
E
E
*
2
8
TR
E
E
*
2
9
TR
E
E
*
3
3
TR
E
E
*
6
2
TR
E
E
*
6
1
TR
E
E
*
6
0
TR
E
E
*
5
9
TR
E
E
*
5
8
TR
E
E
*
5
7
>>
S
W
E
L
L
PE
D
C
VL
T
C
C
F
O
PE
D
C E
EO
H
-
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)
F/O(UG)
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>
>>
>>
G
G
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
S S
S N
1.SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVAL PLAN, ALONG WITH ANY RELATED SURVEYS FOR DETAILS ON
PROPERTY BACKGROUND INFORMATION.
2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON BUILDINGS, MONUMENT SIGNS, TRASH
ENCLOSURES, AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS. VERIFY WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS THE EXACT BUILDING
DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS/SERVICE, AND OTHER RELATED BUILDING ITEMS.
3.SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR
SITE LIGHTING LOCATIONS, DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS.
4.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF CONCRETE, OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING, UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE.
5.ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 5.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
6.ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE CONCRETE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH
AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS, AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT
OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO
PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT
STANDARDS, OR AS APPROVED.
8.BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF
THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, OR AS NOTED. PAVEMENT AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO ADHERE TO ALL
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSIBILITY, INCLUDING SLOPE. CONTACT
ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY INVOLVING ANY DISCREPANCIES.
9.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL
PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
10.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING.
11.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL SITE GOVERNMENTAL PERMITS AND FEES.
12.SEE SHEET C2.2 FOR MEANDER ROAD TYPICAL SECTION.
SITE NOTES
1.ALL TRAFFIC SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL
CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL
DEVICES (MMUTCD), OR AS NOTED OTHERWISE.
2.PARKING LOT STRIPING SHALL BE 4" WIDE COLOR WHITE, TWO COATS OF PAINT. CONTRACTOR
SHALL PAINT ANY/ALL DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROWS AS SHOWN IN WHITE (TWO COATS).
3.ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNS AND MARKINGS PER LATEST ADA CODE AND REQUIREMENTS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY IN EACH
DESIGNATED ACCESSIBLE STALL IN BLUE BACKGROUND WITH WHITE BORDER (TWO COATS OF
PAINT). CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT THE WORDS "NO PARKING" IN EACH ACCESSIBLE ISLE
ADJACENT TO AN ACCESSIBLE SPACE IN WHITE LETTERS MINIMUM 12" IN HEIGHT. SIGNS TO BE
LOCATED AT THE HEAD OF THE PARKING SPACE. SEE ACCESSIBLE PARKING DETAILS.
4.ALL SIGNS SHALL INCLUDE MOUNTING HARDWARE, POST, CONCRETE FOOTING AND CASING
WHERE REQUIRED. CONCRETE CASING REQUIRED IN LOCATIONS WHERE POST IS NOT
PROTECTED BY CURB.
5.IF NOTED, ALL STOP SIGNS SHALL INCLUDE A 12" WIDE PAINTED STOP BAR IN WHITE PAINT
(TWO COATS) PLACED AT THE STOP SIGN LOCATION, A MINIMUM OF 4' FROM CROSSWALK. ALL
STOP BARS SHALL EXTEND FROM DIRECTIONAL TRANSITION BETWEEN LANES TO THE CURB.
6.ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED 18" BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
SIGNAGE AND STRIPING NOTES
SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
PROPERTY ADDRESS / PID:1472 STATE HIGHWAY 55 (PID 0211823330003)
MEDINA, MN 55340
PROPERTY AREA:802,799 S.F. (18.429 AC), PER SURVEY BOUNDARY
442,152 S.F. (10.150 AC) = NORTH PARCEL
360,647 S.F. (8.279 AC) = SOUTH PARCEL
DEVELOPABLE PROPERTY AREA:317,556 S.F. (7.290 AC) = 39.6%
(EXCLUDING WETLAND)70,214 S.F. (1.612 AC) = 15.9% NORTH PARCEL
247,342 S.F. (5.678 AC) = 68.6% SOUTH PARCEL
DEVELOPABLE PROPERTY AREA:317,556 S.F. (7.290 AC) = 39.6%
(EXCLUDING WETLAND & WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER)52,322 S.F. (1.201 AC) = 11.8% NORTH PARCEL
204,459 S.F. (4.693 AC) = 56.69% SOUTH PARCEL
PROPERTY OWNER:R & J PARTNERSHIP OF MEDINA
PROPERTY DEVELOPER:MEDINA VENTURE, LLC
EXISTING ZONING:RR-UR (RURAL RESIDENTIAL URBAN RESERVE) = NORTH
CH (COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY) = SOUTH
PROPOSED ZONING:PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) BOTH NORTH AND SOUTH
GUIDED R2 = NORTH
GUIDED CH = SOUTH
BUILDING TOTAL:51,421 S.F.
NORTH RESIDENTIAL (BLOCK 1, LOT 1-4):4 UNITS (2 DUPLEX), 1,800 S.F. EACH
SOUTH EVENT VENUE (BLOCK 2, LOT 1):22,146 S.F. (INCLUDING 6,996 S.F. BASEMENT)
SOUTH DAY CARE (BLOCK 2, LOT 2):7,500 S.F.
SOUTH RESTAURANT (BLOCK 2, LOT 3):4,975 S.F.
SOUTH RETAIL (BLOCK 2, LOT 4):9,600 S.F.
FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) - REQUIRED:PER PUD
FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) - PROVIDED:0.06 ( 51,421 / 802,799)
BUILDING COVERAGE MAXIMUM:PER PUD
BUILDING COVERAGE PROVIDED:5.1% (40,825 / 802,799)
BUILDING SETBACKS:PER PUD
PROJECT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - EXISTING:29,502 S.F., INCLUDING STREET / TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - PROPOSED:204,000 S.F., INCLUDING STREET / TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - INCREASE:174,500 S.F., INCLUDING STREET / TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS
PARKING REQUIRED:PER PUD, SHARED PARKING
PARKING PROVIDED:PER PUD, SHARED PARKING
NORTH - RESIDENTIAL:10 SPACES (8 WITHIN GARAGES AND 2 VISTOR), EXCLUDING DRIVEWAY
SOUTH - COMMERCIAL:231 SPACES (W/ 8 ACCESSIBLE)
PARKING SIZE MIN. REQUIRED/PROVIDED:9' WIDE X 18' DEEP, 24' DRIVE AISLE (22' MIN.)
PARKING SETBACK:PER PUD
PARKING LANDSCAPE (COMMERCIAL ONLY):5,019 S.F. (5.67%) FOR 88,508 S.F. PERIMETER
SITE PLAN
OVERALL
C2.0
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Professional Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
P. SCHROEDER
15295
N. SCHAUFENBUEL
N. SCHAUFENBUEL
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25721
MICHAEL C. AARON
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
LANDSCAPE
WATER FEATURE
LANDSCAPE
WATER FEATURE
WETLAND CLASSIFICATION
NORTH PARCEL PRESERVE
SOUTH PARCEL MANAGE 2
UPLAND BUFFER ZONE AVERAGE WIDTH
NORTH PARCEL 50 FEET (CITY ALLOWS 35 FEET)
SOUTH PARCEL 25 FEET
MINIMUM UPLAND BUFFER ZONE MINIMUM WIDTH
NORTH PARCEL 30 FEET (CITY MAY ALLOW LESS)
SOUTH PARCEL 20 FEET
BUFFER SETBACK (PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE)
NORTH PARCEL 15 FEET
SOUTH PARCEL 15 FEET
BUFFER SETBACK (ACCESSORY STRUCTURE)
NORTH PARCEL 5 FEET
SOUTH PARCEL 5 FEET
WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER AREA 60,744 SF - EXISTING
NORTH EXISTING 27,485 SF (35 FOOT AVERAGE)
SOUTH EXISTING 33,259 SF (25 FOOT AVERAGE)
WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER AREA 60,775 SF - PROPOSED (CROSS HATCHED AREA)
NORTH PROPOSED 17,892 SF
SOUTH PROPOSED 42,883 SF
PUD FLEXIBILITY
NORTH PARCEL MINIMUM UPLAND BUFFER ZONE WIDTH
(17 FEET MINIMUM AT DEVELOPMENT)
NORTH PARCEL AREA REDUCTION WITH MITIGATION ON SOUTH PARCEL
SOUTH PARCEL MINIMUM UPLAND BUFFER ZONE WIDTH
(2 FEET MINIMUM AT LANDSCAPE WATER FEATURE)
WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15')
WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER (SOUTH=MIN. 20')
DELINEATED WETLAND LINE
WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15')
DELINEATED WETLAND LINE
LOT 1 BLOCK 1
LOT 2 BLOCK 1
LOT 3 BLOCK 1
LOT 4 BLOCK 1
OUTLOT
TOTAL
4,560 SF
4,405 SF
4,405 SF
4,560 SF
424,222 SF
442,152 SF
0.105 ACRES
0.101 ACRES
0.101 ACRES
0.105 ACRES
9.738 ACRES
10.150 ACRES
PROPOSED PLAT NAME: MEANDER (SEE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONS)
PROPOSED PARCEL INFO:
PROPOSED PROPERTY
MEANDER - PLAT SUMMARY - NORTH
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA ACRES
LOT 1 BLOCK 2
LOT 2 BLOCK 2
LOT 3 BLOCK 2
LOT 4 BLOCK 2
TOTAL
266,748 SF
30,391 SF
34,157 SF
29,351 SF
360,647 SF
6.123 ACRES
0.698 ACRES
0.784 ACRES
0.674 ACRES
8.279 ACRES
MEANDER - PLAT SUMMARY - SOUTH
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA ACRES
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 1
OUTLOT
LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4
LOT 1
LOT 2
LOT 3
LOT 4
230 TOTAL PARKING SPACES (INCLUDING 8 ADA)
10 TOTAL PARKING SPACES (INCLUDING 2 PER GARAGE AND 2 VISITOR)
ELEVATED BOARDWALK
ELEVATED
BOARDWALK
UPPER
LEVEL
DECK,
LOWER
LEVEL
WALKOUT
(TYP.)WETLAND
WETLAND
WETLAND
WETLAND
WETLAND
WETLAND
MEANDER ROAD
PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS
- URBAN SECTION WITH CURB
- WEST BOUND LEFT TURN LANE
- LANE CENTER LINE RADIUS TO
ACCOMMODATE 40 MPH SPEED
(667' MIN.)
- CITY TRAIL CROSSING
10' CITY BITUMINOUS TRAIL
WITH 5' BOULEVARD
COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY
WITH DEDICATED OUTBOUND
LEFT AND RIGHT LANES
RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY
EXISTING FARMSTEAD RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY
SITE LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
EASEMENT
SETBACK LINE (PER CODE)
EXISTING CONDITIONS
TRUNCATED DOMES
CURB AND GUTTER
CURB AND GUTTER (TIP-OUT)
ORNAMENTAL FENCE
PARKING LOT POLE LIGHT
RETAINING WALL
PARKING SPACES PER ROW
WETLAND DELINEATION LINE
WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER
WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER & WETLAND
BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
WETLAND UPLAND
BUFFER SETBACK
PUD FLEXIBILITY
AT DEVELOPMENT,
MIN. 17' , WITH
SPLIT RAIL FENCE
AT BACKYARD
PERIMETER(TYP.)
WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER
WETLAND UPLAND
BUFFER SETBACK
PUD FLEXIBILITY
AT LANDSCAPE
WATER FEATURE,
MIN. 2' (TYP.)
WETLAND
UPLAND
BUFFER
DELINEATED WETLAND LINE
WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER SUMMARY
WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER
(SOUTH=MIN. 20')
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
1 10-20-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE
2 11-04-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE
MBMBMBMB
TR
E
E
*
2
8
TR
E
E
*
2
9
TR
E
E
*
3
3
TR
E
E
*
6
2
TR
E
E
*
6
1
TR
E
E
*
6
0
TR
E
E
*
5
9
TR
E
E
*
5
8
TR
E
E
*
5
7
>>
>>
RESTAURANT
4,975 SF
PLAY AREA
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
PLAY AREA
EVENT VENUE
15,150 SF
PLUS
6,996 SF
BASEMENT
(STORAGE /
DATA CENTER)
RETAIL
9,600 SF
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
PRIVATE DRIVE
S
W
E
L
L
PE
D
C
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)F/O(UG)F/O(UG)
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>
>
G
G
G
G
F/O(U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
SS
N
STORM SEWER
PLAN SOUTH
C5.3
UTILITY LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
STORM SEWER
DRAIN TILE
SANITARY SEWER
WATER MAIN
ELECTRIC (BURIED)
ELECTRIC (OVERHEAD)
TELEPHONE (BURIED)
TELEPHONE (OVERHEAD)
TELEVISION (BURIED)
TELEVISION (OVERHEAD)
FIBER OPTIC (BURIED)
FIBER OPTIC (OVERHEAD)
COMMUNICATION (UNDEFINED)
NATURAL GAS LINE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS
STORM MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN
STORM FLARED END SECTION
CLEAN OUT (CO)
SANITARY MANHOLE
HYDRANT
GATE VALVE
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Professional Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
P. SCHROEDER
15295
N. SCHAUFENBUEL
N. SCHAUFENBUEL
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX25721
MICHAEL C. AARON
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
UNDERGROUND STORMWATER FILTRATION BASIN
PRINSCO HS180, OR APPROVED EQUAL.
146'X73'
STORMWATER FILTRATION BASIN.
SEE GRADING PLAN AND DETAILS
RAINWATER REUSE CISTERN
10,000 GAL
60" GOLDPRO STORM SYSTEM OR
APPROVED EQUAL. SEE DETAILS
UPPER FFE = 998.0'
LOWER FFE = 989.0'
WETLAND ELEVATION VARIABLE
FLOODPLAIN 986.0'
FFE = 998.0'
FFE = 998.0'
FFE = 1000.0'
EX
.
1
2
"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
W
M
STM CB 116
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM = 990.21
N INV = 983.82
S INV = 984.54
STM CB 118
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM = 992.99
NW INV = 985.23
SE INV = 985.33
STM MH 120
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM = 994.32
E INV = 990.19
W INV = 986.49
N INV = 990.53
STM MH 122
60" DIA. PRETREATMENT
R-1642-B
RIM 995.70
W INV = 991.00
N INV = 989.31
S INV = 989.41
SUMP = 983.41
62 LF 18" RCP @ 1.0%
70 LF
1
8
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
0
%
11
6
L
F
1
8
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
0
%
82
L
F
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
0
%
STM CB 124
48" DIA. R-3067-V
RIM 994.49
N INV = 989.55
W INV = 990.05
S INV = 989.65
STM CB 126
48" DIA. R-3067-VB
RIM 993.18
W INV = 990.14
N INV = 989.84
S INV = 990.14
STM MH 128
R-1642-B
RIM 995.21
INV = 991.11
STM CB 130
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM 995.0
E INV = 990.82
STM CB 132
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM 994.13
E INV = 990.61
W INV = 990.51
S INV = 990.61
42
L
F
1
2
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
5
%
93
L
F
1
8
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
5
%
37 LF 18" RCP @ 0.5%
STM CB 134
48" DIA.
R-3067-VB
RIM 993.96
W INV = 990.72
N INV = 990.27
S INV = 990.57
STM CB 136
48" DIA.
R-3067-V
RIM 994.10
SE INV = 991.12
N INV = 990.94
S INV = 991.04
STM CB 138
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM 996.93
N INV = 991.99
STM CB 140
48" DIA.
R-3067-VB
RIM 995.91
NW INV = 992.52
S INV = 992.62
STM CB 142
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-VB
RIM 993.96
E INV = 990.89
STM CB 138
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-VB
RIM 993.18
E INV = 990.31
28 LF 24" RCP @ 0.5%
26 LF 18" RCP @ 0.5%
37 LF 18" RCP @ 1.0%
63 LF 1
5
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
5
%
14
0
L
F
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
0
%
17 LF 15" RCP @ 1.0%
17 LF 15" RCP @ 1.0%
DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT (TYP.)
12.0'
12
.
0
'
12.0'
12.0'
12
.
0
'
GRAF FILTER
INV = 990.91
STM CB 131
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM 996.20
W INV = 990.34
15" STORM APRON
INV = 990.0
34 LF 15" RCP @ 1.0%
WET WELL
60" DIA.
R-1642-B
WATER REUSE PUMP
AND TREATMENT SKID
CONTECH STORMFILTER VAULT AND FILTER
CARTRIDGES, OR APPROVED EQUAL. SEE DETAILS
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
009-09-2022CITY SUBMITTAL
110-20-2022SUBM'T UPDATE
MBMBMBMB
TR
E
E
*
7
8
RES
UNIT 1
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 2
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 3
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 4
1800 SF
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
PLAY AREA
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
PRIVATE DRIVE
EO
H
-
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)
E(O
H
)
F/O(UG)F/O(UG)
>
>>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>
G
G
G
G
S N
STORM SEWER
PLAN NORTH
C5.4
UTILITY LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
STORM SEWER
DRAIN TILE
SANITARY SEWER
WATER MAIN
ELECTRIC (BURIED)
ELECTRIC (OVERHEAD)
TELEPHONE (BURIED)
TELEPHONE (OVERHEAD)
TELEVISION (BURIED)
TELEVISION (OVERHEAD)
FIBER OPTIC (BURIED)
FIBER OPTIC (OVERHEAD)
COMMUNICATION (UNDEFINED)
NATURAL GAS LINE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS
STORM MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN
STORM FLARED END SECTION
CLEAN OUT (CO)
SANITARY MANHOLE
HYDRANT
GATE VALVE
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Professional Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
P. SCHROEDER
15295
N. SCHAUFENBUEL
N. SCHAUFENBUEL
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25721
MICHAEL C. AARON
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
WETLAND ELEVATION VARIABLE
FLOODPLAIN 986.0'
UPPER FFE = 998.0'
LOWER FFE = 989.0'
UPPER FFE = 998.0'
LOWER FFE = 989.0'
UPPER FFE = 1001.0'
LOWER FFE = 992.0'
UPPER FFE = 1001.0'
LOWER FFE = 992.0'
STM CB 100
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM 1003.24
S INV = 997.68
STM CB 102
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM = 1002.94
N INV = 996.41
W INV = 996.31
43 LF 15" RCP @ 3.0%
STM CB 104
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM = 995.01
S INV = 990.76
41 LF 15" RCP @ 0.5%
19
2
L
F
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
3
.
0
%
STM CB 106
48" DIA.
R-3067-V
RIM = 995.23
E INV = 990.56
N INV = 990.56
W INV = 990.46
SUMP = 986.46
92
L
F
1
8
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
5
%
STM CB 108
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM = 988.46
E INV = 985.50
SUMP = 982.50
STM CB 110
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM = 988.72
SW INV = 984.53
STM CB 112
48" DIA.
R-3067-V
RIM = 988.73
W INV = 983.99
NE INV = 984.33
E INV = 986.00
STM CB 114
48" DIA.
R-3067-V
RIM = 988.06
N INV = 983.32
S INV = 984.1
W INV = 983.82
SUMP= 979.82
34 LF 15" RCP @ 0.5%
64
L
F
2
4
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
5
%
15" STORM APRON
INVERT = 985.2018" STORM APRON
INVERT = 990.0
24" STORM APRON
INVERT = 983.0
30 LF 15" RCP @ 1.0%
12
.
0
'
12.0'
12.0'
DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT (TYP.)
39 LF 15" RCP @ 0.5%
RE-ROUTE EXISTING WATER MAIN AROUND CATCH
BASINS AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER.
12" STORM APRON
INVERT = 985.0
12" STORM APRON
INVERT = 984.87
25 LF 12" CMP @ 0.5%
12" STORM APRON
INVERT = 986.0
UNDERGROUND STORMWATER BASIN
36" PIPE GALLERY. SEE DETAILS.
25 LF 12" RCP @ 0.5%
STM MH 101
48" DIA. PRETREATMENT
R-1642-B
RIM 993.50
N INV = 986.50
S INV = 986.50
SUMP = 982.50
STM CB 103
48" DIA.
R-2370
RIM 993.89
N INV = 986.55
STM MH 105
48" DIA. OUTLET STRUCTURE
W/ WEIR AND 6" ORIFICE
R-1642-B
RIM 989.43
N INV = 986.50
S INV = 986.25
WIER = 988.80
STM MH 111
48" DIA.
M-11
RIM = 991.50
W INV = 986.25
SE INV = 986.50
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
1 10-20-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE
99
6 99
5
99
4
99
3
992
991 990 98
9 98
8
98
8
98
9 99
0
99
1
99
2
99
3
99
499
199
098
9
994
99
3
992
991
990
989
988
98
8
987
986
985
98
4
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
100
2
100
3
10
0
0
99
9
998
997
996995
994
993
992
991
990
989
988
987
986
985
984
983
982
985
98
5
98
4
98
3
98
4
98
3
RES
UNIT 1
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 2
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 3
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 4
1800 SF
RESTAURANT
4,975 SF
EVENT VENUE
15,150 SF
PLUS
6,996 SF
BASEMENT
(STORAGE /
DATA CENTER)
RETAIL
9,600 SF
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
MBMBMBMB
>>
X
X
XXX
X
X
XX X
X
X XX
XXXXXX
XXXXX
XXXX
XX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
XX
X
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
HIG
H
W
A
Y
5
5
CAVANAUGH DRIVE
N
TREE PRESERVATION
PLAN - OVERALL
T1.0
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
009-09-2022CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
TREE PRESERVATION LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING CONTOURS
EXISTING SITE FEATURES
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SIGNIFICANT TREE REMOVAL
EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
X
WETLAND DELINEATION LINE
EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES
NORTH PARCEL PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SOUTH PARCEL PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SOUTH PARCEL EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREES NORTH PARCEL EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREES
PROJECT SIGNIFICANT TREE
PRESERVATION SUMMARY
EXISTING TREES ARE PRIMARILY PIONEERING TREES,
QUALIFYING FOR EXEMPT STATUS
1.CLEAR, GRUB, AND REMOVE ALL TREES AND VEGETATION WITHIN
THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, OR AS NOTED.
2.TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE DRIP LINE
OF TREES TO REMAIN, OR AS ILLUSTRATED, WITHIN LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND
MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT.
3.NO DETRIMENTAL CONDITIONS TO OCCUR AT TREE PRESERVATION
AREAS, SUCH AS STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT/MATERIALS, CHEMICAL
WASH, OR EXCAVATION.
4.REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR TREE REPLACEMENT LOCATION.
TREE PRESERVATION NOTES
99
6
99
5
99
4
99
3
992
991
990
98
9
988
98
8
98
999
0
99
1
99
2
99
3
99
4
99
1 99
0
98
9
994
99
3
992
991
990
989
988
988
987
986
985
98
4
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
100
2
100
3
985
98
4
98
3
MBMBMBMB
>>
>>
X
X
XXX
X
X
X XX
X
XXX
XXXXXX
XXXXX
XXXX
XX
X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XX XXX XXX X
X
XX
X
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
HIG
H
W
A
Y
5
5
TREE*6
TREE*5
TREE*4
TREE*3
TREE*2
TREE*1
TREE*28
TREE*29
TREE*30
TREE*32
TREE*31
TREE*33
TREE*77
TREE*76
TREE*74
TREE*73
TREE*75
TREE*8
TREE*9
TREE*10
TREE*14
TREE*13
TREE*12
TREE*17
TREE*16 TREE*15
TREE*19
TREE*18 TREE*20
TREE*21
TREE*22 TREE*23
TREE*24
TREE*25
TREE*26
TREE*27
TREE*34
TREE*35
TREE*36
TREE*37
TREE*38
TREE*39
TREE*40
TREE*41
TREE*42
TREE*43
TREE*44
TREE*45
TREE*11
TREE*47
TREE*46
TREE*49
TREE*48
TREE*50
TREE*51
TREE*52
TREE*53
TREE*54
TREE*55
TREE*56
TREE*63
TREE*64
TREE*65
TREE*66
TREE*67
TREE*68
TREE*69
TREE*70
TREE*71
TREE*72
TREE*62
TREE*61
TREE*60
TREE*59
TREE*58
TREE*57
TREE*7
N
TREE PRESERVATION
PLAN - SOUTH
T1.1
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
TREE PRESERVATION LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING CONTOURS
EXISTING SITE FEATURES
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SIGNIFICANT TREE REMOVAL
EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
X
WETLAND DELINEATION LINE
EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
EXISTING BARN
SOUTH PARCEL EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREES
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
100
2
100
3
10
0
0
99
9
998
997
996995
994
993
992
991
990
989
988
987
986
985
984
983
982
985
98
4
98
3
MBMBMBMB
X
XXXX
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
TREE*78
TREE*1
TREE*69
TREE*70
TREE*71
TREE*72
N
TREE PRESERVATION
PLAN - NORTH
T1.2
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
009-09-2022CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com TREE PRESERVATION LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING CONTOURS
EXISTING SITE FEATURES
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SIGNIFICANT TREE REMOVAL
EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
X
WETLAND DELINEATION LINE
EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
NORTH PARCEL EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREES
MBMBMBMB
TR
E
E
*
7
8
TR
E
E
*
2
8
TR
E
E
*
2
9
TR
E
E
*
3
3
TR
E
E
*
6
2
TR
E
E
*
6
1
TR
E
E
*
6
0
TR
E
E
*
5
9
TR
E
E
*
5
8
TR
E
E
*
5
7
>>
RES
UNIT 1
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 2
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 3
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 4
1800 SF
RESTAURANT
4,975 SF
PLAY AREA
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
PLAY AREA
EVENT VENUE
15,150 SF
PLUS
6,996 SF
BASEMENT
(STORAGE /
DATA CENTER)
RETAIL
9,600 SF
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
PRIVATE DRIVE
S
G
G
L
G
L
-
W
E
L
L
PE
D
C
TF
O
B
+
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
-
UN
P
/
W
A
T
E
R
V
A
L
V
E
M
A
R
K
E
R
VL
T
C
C
F
O
PE
D
C E
EO
H
-
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)
F/O(UG)
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>
>>
>>
G
G
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
S S
S
CONIFEROUS TREES COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY
PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA`BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6` HT.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 7
DECIDUOUS TREES COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY
ACER RUBRUM `NORTHWOOD`NORTHWOOD MAPLE 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 5
ACER X FREEMANII 'JEFFERSRED'AUTUMN BLAZE® FREEMAN MAPLE 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 9
BETULA NIGRA `CULLY` TM HERITAGE RIVER BIRCH 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 6
CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS COMMON HACKBERRY 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 7
GINKGO BILOBA `AUTUMN GOLD` TM AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 3
GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS `HARVE`NORTHERN ACCLAIM HONEYLOCUST 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 3
QUERCUS BICOLOR SWAMP WHITE OAK 2.5" CAL.CONT.SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 7
QUERCUS X MACDANIELLI `CLEMONS` TM HERITAGE OAK 2.5" CAL.CONT.SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 3
TILIA AMERICANA `REDMOND`REDMOND AMERICAN LINDEN 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 8
ULMUS DAVIDIANA JAPONICA `DISCOVERY`DISCOVERY ELM 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 18
ORNAMENTAL TREE COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY
MALUS X `SPRING SNOW`SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE 2" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 12
MALUS X 'PINK SPIRES'PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE 2" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 13
SHRUBS COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY
ARONIA MELANOCARPA `MORTON` TM IROQUIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.16
CORNUS STOLONIFERA `FARROW`ARCTIC FIRE RED TWIG DOGWOOD #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.45
COTONEASTER LUCIDUS HEDGE COTONEASTER #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.39
POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA `GOLDFINGER`GOLDFINGER BUSH POTENTILLA #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.90
RIBES ALPINUM ALPINE CURRANT #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.70
THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'SMARAGD'EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.12
PERENNIALS AND GRASSES COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY
CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT.PLANT 3` O.C.296
HEMEROCALLIS X `STELLA SUPREME`STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY #1 CONT.PLANT 18" O.C.535
NEPETA X `WALKER`S LOW`WALKER`S LOW CATMINT #1 CONT.PLANT 24" O.C.138
RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM`GOLDSTRUM BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT.PLANT 18" O.C.113
SALVIA X SYLVESTRIS `MAY NIGHT`MAY NIGHT SAGE #1 CONT.PLANT 18" O.C.132
SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT.PLANT 24" O.C.117
PLANT SCHEDULE
N
LANDSCAPE NOTES
LANDSCAPE PLAN -
OVERALL
L1.0
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
LANDSCAPE LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
DECIDUOUS TREE
CONIFEROUS TREE
ORNAMENTAL TREE
SHRUBS/PERENNIALS
SOD
MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST (MNDOT SEED MIX 35-641)
WITH WITH CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST (MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261)
WITH CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON
BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES
WETLAND BUFFER
EXISTING TREE/SHRUBS TO REMAIN
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LANDSCAPE EDGER
LIMITS OF IRRIGATION
1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL
2.ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SOIL CONDITIONS.
3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.
4.COORDINATE ALL LANDSCAPE WORK WITH APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL.
5.ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR.
6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHlTECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN
ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING.
7.ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS:
-ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC.
-ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES.
-ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFlNG.
-CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3.
8.PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED.
9.PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES.
10.PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY.
11.PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO
THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.
12.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON B&B MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS.
13.PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES.
14.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST.
15.STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR.
16.THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED
OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS.
17.TOPSOIL (AND PLANTING SOIL) TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW), AND TO BE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS (LARGER THAN ONE INCH), SUBSOIL
DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS, UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. UTILIZE EXISTING ON-SITE TOPSOIL AS APPROPRIATE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH
TOPSOIL (PLANTING SOIL) FOR TREE, SHRUBS. AND PERENNIALS.
18.MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, LANDSCAPE BED, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS, OR AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE A MINIMUM 4-INCH
DEPTH, RED COLORED (OR AS DIRECTED), AND FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE A MINIMUM 3-INCH DEPTH, BUFF LIMESTONE (OR AS DIRECTED), AND 1.5-INCH TO
3-INCH DIAMETER. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WlTH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
19.EDGING TO BE PROVIDED BETWEEN MULCH AND LAWN TURF AREAS, OR AS INDICATED. STEEL EDGING BETWEEN LANDSCAPE BEDS AND LAWN TURF AREAS TO BE COMMERCIAL BLACK STEEL
EDGING, INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION GUIDELINES. BLACK STEEL EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH CONNECTORS AND METAL STAKES NO GREATER THAN 4-FOOT ON
CENTER AND ELEVATION BELOW LAWN MOWER CUT LINE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. INDIVIDUAL TREE AND SHRUB AREAS TO BE SPADED EDGE BETWEEN
MULCH AND LAWN TURF GRASS AREAS WITH V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION.
20.All DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND/OR HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. SEED
MIX AND APPLICATION RATE AS SPECIFIED PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS, OR AS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR RESEED ANY DAMAGED OR UNESTABLISHED
AREAS UNTIL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE AND COMPLETION OF WARRANTY.
21.PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ON SlTE, OR AS INDICATED. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PLANS, CALCULATIONS, AND SHOP DRAWINGS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION
MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR
WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. COORDINATE ALL IRRIGATION PIPES, WIRING, SLEEVING, AND OTHER COMPONENTS WITH OTHER PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS.
22.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR.
23.REPAIR ALL DAMAGE FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER.
WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15')
WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER (MIN. 20')
WETLAND
WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15')
WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER (MIN. 20')
WETLAND
IRRIGATION LIMITS (ALL SOD AND
SHRUB/PERENNIAL AREAS)
MBMBMBMB
TR
E
E
*
2
8
TR
E
E
*
2
9
TR
E
E
*
3
3
TR
E
E
*
6
2
TR
E
E
*
6
1
TR
E
E
*
6
0
TR
E
E
*
5
9
TR
E
E
*
5
8
TR
E
E
*
5
7
>>
>>
RESTAURANT
4,975 SF
PLAY AREA
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
PLAY AREA
EVENT VENUE
15,150 SF
PLUS
6,996 SF
BASEMENT
(STORAGE /
DATA CENTER)
RETAIL
9,600 SF
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
PRIVATE DRIVE
S
G
G
L
G
L
-
W
E
L
L
PE
D
C
TF
O
B
+
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
-
UN
P
/
W
A
T
E
R
V
A
L
V
E
M
A
R
K
E
R
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)F/O(UG)F/O(UG)
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>
>
G
G
G
G
F/O(U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
SS
(7) BLACK HILLS SPRUCE
(3) HERITAGE OAK(8) REDMOND AMERICAN LINDEN
(3) AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO
(3) COMMON HACKBERRY
(3) COMMON HACKBERRY
(4) SWAMP WHITE OAK
(3) PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE
(3) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE
(3) PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE
(3) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE
(3) PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE
(3) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE
(4) PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE
(3) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE
(9) AUTUMN BLAZE® FREEMAN MAPLE
(8) DISCOVERY ELM
(9) DISCOVERY ELM
(3) NORTHERN ACCLAIM HONEYLOCUST
N
LANDSCAPE PLAN -
SOUTH
L1.1
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
009-09-2022CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
LANDSCAPE LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
DECIDUOUS TREE
CONIFEROUS TREE
ORNAMENTAL TREE
SHRUBS/PERENNIALS
SOD
MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST (MNDOT SEED MIX 35-641)
WITH WITH CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST (MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261)
WITH CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON
BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES
WETLAND BUFFER
EXISTING TREE/SHRUBS TO REMAIN
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LANDSCAPE EDGER
LIMITS OF IRRIGATION
SOUTH PARCEL LANDSCAPE SUMMARY
MINIMUM NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS REQUIRED
·SOUTH PARCEL LOT PERIMETER = 2,435
·1 SHADE TREE PER 50 LF LOT PERIMETER = 49 REQUIRED
·1 ORNAMENTAL TREE PER 100 LF LOT PERIMETER = 25 REQUIRED
·1 SHRUB PER 30 LF LOT PERIMETER = 82 REQUIRED
PROPOSED NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS
·EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED AND CREDITED TOWARD THE MINIMUM
REQUIRED TREES ON A SITE = 8
·PROPOSED SHADE TREE = 51
·PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE = 25
·TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED TREES = EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED +
PROPOSED TREES = 84 TREES
·PROPOSED SHRUBS = 190
·PROPOSED PERENNIALS = 1,139
WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15')
WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER (MIN. 20')
WETLAND
ALL EXISTING VEGETATION DISTURBED
BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN THE
WETLAND BUFFER TO BE RESTORED
WITH MESIC PRAIRIE SEED MIX
APPROXIMATE IRRIGATION SYSTEM
CONTROLS AND WATER SUPPLY
(REUSE ROOF WATER CISTERN AND
SUPPLEMENTAL WELL)
OVERHEAD UTILITIES
SEE SHEET L1.3 AND L1.4 FOR SHRUB
AND PERENNIAL BED PLANTING LAYOUT
IRRIGATION LIMITS (ALL SOD AND
SHRUB/PERENNIAL AREAS)
STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX WITH
CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON
BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON
SIDE SLOPES MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST SEED MIX WITH
CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
SOD
MBMBMBMB
TR
E
E
*
7
8
RES
UNIT 1
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 2
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 3
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 4
1800 SF
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
PLAY AREA
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
PRIVATE DRIVE
G
G
L
G
L
-
TF
O
B
+
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
-
UN
P
/
W
A
T
E
R
V
A
L
V
E
M
A
R
K
E
R
EO
H
-
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)
E(O
H
)
F/O(UG)F/O(UG)
>
>>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>
G
G
G
G
S
(7) BLACK HILLS SPRUCE
(3) HERITAGE RIVER BIRCH
(3) SWAMP WHITE OAK
(3) NORTHWOOD MAPLE
(8) REDMOND AMERICAN LINDEN
(1) NORTHWOOD MAPLE
(3) COMMON HACKBERRY
(3) COMMON HACKBERRY
(1) NORTHWOOD MAPLE
(3) HERITAGE RIVER BIRCH
(3) NORTHERN ACCLAIM HONEYLOCUST
NORTH PARCEL LANDSCAPE SUMMARY
MINIMUM NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS REQUIRED
·4 TREES PER UNIT (16 TOTAL)
·0.2 OPACITY BUFFER YARD TO EAST AND WEST
·NO SHRUBS OR PERENNIALS REQUIRED
PROPOSED NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS
·EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED AND CREDITED TOWARD THE MINIMUM
REQUIRED TREES ON A SITE = 1
·SHADE TREE/EVERGREEN TREES = 24
·TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED TREES = EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED +
PROPOSED TREES = 25 TREES
·PROPOSED SHRUBS = 70
·PROPOSED PERENNIALS = 191
PROPOSED EAST BUFFER YARD CALCULATION
·BUFFER YARD WIDTH = 5'
·BUFFER YARD LENGTH = 225'
·BUFFER YARD POINTS PER 100 LF = 84
·BUFFER YARD POINTS REQUIRED = 225100 = 2.25*84 = 189
·BUFFER YARD POINTS PER 'TALL DECIDUOUS SHRUB' = 5
·TOTAL NUMBER OF BUFFER YARD POINTS = 113*5 = 565
PROPOSED WEST BUFFER YARD CALCULATION
·BUFFER YARD WIDTH = VARIES, ASSUME 15'
·BUFFER YARD LENGTH = 240'
·BUFFER YARD POINTS PER 100 LF = 198
·BUFFER YARD POINTS REQUIRED = 240100 = 2.40*198 = 476
·BUFFER YARD POINTS PER '2.5" CAL OVERSTORY TREE' = 50
·TOTAL NUMBER OF BUFFER YARD POINTS = 10*50 = 500
N
LANDSCAPE PLAN -
NORTH
L1.2
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
LANDSCAPE LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
DECIDUOUS TREE
CONIFEROUS TREE
ORNAMENTAL TREE
SHRUBS/PERENNIALS
SOD
MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST (MNDOT SEED MIX 35-641)
WITH WITH CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST (MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261)
WITH CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON
BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES
WETLAND BUFFER
EXISTING TREE/SHRUBS TO REMAIN
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LANDSCAPE EDGER
LIMITS OF IRRIGATION
EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIESPROPERTY LINE
IRRIGATION LIMITS (ALL SOD AND
SHRUB/PERENNIAL AREAS)
STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX WITH
CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON BOTTOM
OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES
MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST SEED MIX WITH
CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
SOD
ALL EXISTING VEGETATION DISTURBED
BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN THE
WETLAND BUFFER TO BE RESTORED
WITH MESIC PRAIRIE SEED MIX
SEE SHEET L1.4 FOR SHRUB AND
PERENNIAL BED PLANTING LAYOUT
PLAY AREA
PLUS
6,996 SF
BASEMENT
(STORAGE /
DATA CENTER)
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
W
E
L
L
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
(16) IROQUIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY
(23) GOLDSTRUM BLACK-EYED SUSAN
(27) GOLDSTRUM BLACK-EYED SUSAN
(3) EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE
(3) EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE
(3) EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE
(3) EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE
(15) ARCTIC FIRE RED
TWIG DOGWOOD
(15) ARCTIC FIRE RED
TWIG DOGWOOD
(15) ARCTIC FIRE RED
TWIG DOGWOOD
(39) HEDGE COTONEASTER
(98) WALKER`S LOW CATMINT
(40) WALKER`S LOW CATMINT
(28) GOLDFINGER BUSH POTENTILLA
(62) GOLDFINGER BUSH POTENTILLA
(45) MAY NIGHT SAGE
(24) MAY NIGHT SAGE
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(8) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(49) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(16) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(5) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(12) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(8) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(17) KARL FOERSTER
FEATHER REED GRASS
(29) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(15) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(10) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(15) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(10) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(15) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(10) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(15) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(10) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(15) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(6) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
N
LANDSCAPE
ENLARGEMENT PLAN
L1.3
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
009-09-2022CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
SOUTH PARCEL LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PLAN 1 1
L1.3
APPROXIMATE IRRIGATION SYSTEM
CONTROLS AND WATER SUPPLY
(REUSE ROOF WATER CISTERN AND
SUPPLEMENTAL WELL)
MBMBMBMB
RES
UNIT 1
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 2
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 3
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 4
1800 SF
PRIVATE DRIVE
G
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
-
E(
U
G
)
E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)
F/O(UG)
F/O(UG)
F/O(UG)F/O(UG)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
(3) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(113) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(9) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(16) PRAIRIE DROPSEED
(16) PRAIRIE DROPSEED
(18) PRAIRIE DROPSEED
(17) ALPINE CURRANT
(19) ALPINE CURRANT
(17) ALPINE CURRANT
(17) ALPINE CURRANT
PLAY AREA
PE
D
CE(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
(20) MAY NIGHT SAGE
(63) GOLDSTRUM BLACK-EYED SUSAN
(43) MAY NIGHT SAGE
(62) GOLDFINGER BUSH POTENTILLA
(4) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(3) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(6) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(49) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(20) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(13) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(16) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(33) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(25) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(30) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(37) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(22) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(28) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(51)PRAIRIE DROPSEED N
LANDSCAPE
ENLARGEMENT PLAN
L1.4
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
SOUTH PARCEL LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PLAN 21
L1.4
NORTH PARCEL LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PLAN1
L1.4
N
METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER
METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER
METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER
METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER
METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER
METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER
4" STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGER, TOP EDGE
BELOW MOW LINE.
PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE
CENTRAL LEADER.
GUYING AND STAKING, ONLY AS REQUIRED, FOR
ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND
CONIFEROUS TREES:
TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST
BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW
GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED
WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS.
PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND
OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS
WITH 16" LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR
POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP.
TREE WRAP MATERIAL (FOR DECIDUOUS TREES) FROM
GROUND LINE UPWARD TO FIRST BRANCHES, AS
REQUIRED.
PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVER PLANT PITS -
DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK.
FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN
SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE
REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK
FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED
AT OR 2" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE
SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR
COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL
GROUND LINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE
2X BALL DIA.
SET CONTAINER ROOT SOIL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL
OR MILD COMPACTED SOIL FOR DEPTH TO MATCH FINISH
GRADE
BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL
FINISHED GRADE (LAWN)
EXISTING SOIL
SPECIFIED MULCH,
SHALL BE 1/2" BELOW
TOP OF EDGER.
PLANTING BED SOIL MIX TO BE
MINIMUM OF 4" BELOW EDGING TOP
TO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE LIP FOR
MULCH.
SPECIFIED TOPSOIL
12" STEEL STAKE,
FASTENED TO EDGER AND
ANCHORED INTO GROUND
REMOVE CONTAINER, SCARIFY SIDES, AND SET SOIL
MASS ON COMPACTED SOIL BASE MOUND, MATCHING
SHRUBS NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED GRADE
MULCH AS SPECIFIED (AND FILTER FABRIC, AS
INDICATED)
EDGING AT PLANTING BEDS, AS SPECIFIED, ADJACENT
TO LAWN AREAS
BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED PLANTING SOIL OR
AS APPROVED
SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE, DEPTH PER
CONTAINER DEPTH
2X CONT. DIA.
CLEAR ZONE TO
EDGE OF SHRUB
24"
CONCRETE WALK
(PER SITE PLAN)
DECIDUOUS / CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE
STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGER DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
LANDSCAPE DETAILS
L2.0
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
009-09-2022CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
MBMBMBMB
TR
E
E
*
2
8
TR
E
E
*
2
9
TR
E
E
*
3
3
TR
E
E
*
6
1
TR
E
E
*
6
0
TR
E
E
*
5
9
TR
E
E
*
5
8
TR
E
E
*
5
7
>>
RES
UNIT 1
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 2
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 3
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 4
1800 SF
RESTAURANT
4,975 SF
PLAY AREA
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
PLAY AREA
EVENT VENUE
15,150 SF
PLUS
6,996 SF
BASEMENT
(STORAGE /
DATA CENTER)
RETAIL
9,600 SF
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
PRIVATE DRIVE
BOARDWALK/DECK STRINGER
BOARDWALK/DECK RAILING
EXPOSED BUILDING FOUNDATION
ATTACH BOARDWALK/DECK
TO BUILDING
BOARDWALK/DECK PLANKS
WITH 1/4" +/- GAPS BETWEEN
15'
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
D
E
L
I
N
E
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
BUILDING WALL
BOARDWALK/DECK PILE
CAP BEAM AND
ANCHOR BRACKET
LOWER BUILDING FINISHED
FLOOR ELEVATION: 989.0
12
.
2
'
+
/
-
EXISTING
GROUND
UPPER BUILDING FINISHED
FLOOR ELEVATION: 998.0
PROPOSED
GROUND
DOOR
CONCRETE
STOOP
FLOODPLAIN: 986.0'
HELICAL ANCHOR / STRUCTURAL PIER
MATCH
EXISTING GRADE
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
:
9
8
3
.
7
8
+
/
-
(
V
A
R
I
A
B
L
E
)
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
U
P
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
P
R
I
N
C
I
P
A
L
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
BOARDWALK/DECK STRINGER
BOARDWALK/DECK RAILING
EXPOSED BUILDING FOUNDATION
ATTACH BOARDWALK/DECK
TO BUILDING
BOARDWALK/DECK PLANKS
WITH 1/4" +/- GAPS BETWEEN
24.3'
BUILDING WALL
BOARDWALK/DECK PILE
CAP BEAM AND
ANCHOR BRACKET9.5
'
+
/
-
EXISTING
GROUND
UPPER BUILDING FINISHED
FLOOR ELEVATION: 998.0
PROPOSED
GROUND
SECONDARY LOWER
LEVEL CONCRETE
SERVICE ROUTE
FLOODPLAIN: 986.0'
HELICAL ANCHOR / STRUCTURAL PIER
MATCH
EXISTING GRADE
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
D
E
L
I
N
E
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
:
9
8
5
.
5
3
+
/
-
(
V
A
R
I
A
B
L
E
)
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
U
P
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
P
R
I
N
C
I
P
A
L
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
ELEVATION: 989.0
A
N
LANDSCAPE DETAILS -
BOARDWALK AND
DECK
L2.1
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
BOARDWALK/DECK SECTION LOCATION
TYPICAL BOARDWALK / DECK SECTION A - A'
TYPICAL BOARDWALK / DECK SECTION B - B'
A'
B
B'
C
C'
D
D'
E
E'
WETLAND DELINEATION LINE
WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER
(MINIMUM 30')
WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURE SETBACK (MINIMUM 15')
WETLAND DELINEATION LINE
WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER
(MINIMUM 20')
WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURE SETBACK (MINIMUM 15')
BOARDWALK/DECK STRINGER
BOARDWALK/DECK RAILING
EXPOSED BUILDING FOUNDATION
ATTACH BOARDWALK/DECK
TO BUILDING
BOARDWALK/DECK PLANKS
WITH 1/4" +/- GAPS BETWEEN
14.6'
BUILDING WALL
BOARDWALK/DECK PILE
CAP BEAM AND
ANCHOR BRACKET 10
.
0
'
+
/
-
EXISTING
GROUND
BUILDING UPPER FINISHED
FLOOR ELEVATION: 998.0
HELICAL ANCHOR /
STRUCTURAL PIER
MATCH
EXISTING
GRADE
FLOODPLAIN: 986.0'
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
D
E
L
I
N
E
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
:
9
8
6
.
4
5
+
/
-
(
V
A
R
I
A
B
L
E
)
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
U
P
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
P
R
I
N
C
I
P
A
L
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
BUILDING LOWER FINISHED
FLOOR ELEVATION: 998.0
BOARDWALK/DECK STRINGER
BOARDWALK/DECK RAILING
ATTACH BOARDWALK/DECK
TO BUILDING
BOARDWALK/DECK PLANKS
WITH 1/4" +/- GAPS BETWEEN
8.0'
FLOODPLAIN 986.0' (NOT SHOWN)
BUILDING WALL2.0
'
+
/
-
EXISTING
GROUND
BUILDING FINISHED FLOOR
ELEVATION: 998.0
HELICAL ANCHOR / STRUCTURAL PIER
MATCH
EXISTING
GRADE
8.6
'
+
/
-
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
D
E
L
I
N
E
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
:
9
8
8
.
1
4
+
/
-
(
V
A
R
I
A
B
L
E
)
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
U
P
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
P
R
I
N
C
I
P
A
L
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
HELICAL ANCHOR / STRUCTURAL PIER
10.0'(PERPENDICULARLY)
BOARDWALK/DECK STRINGER
BOARDWALK/DECK RAILING
EXPOSED BUILDING FOUNDATION
ATTACH BOARDWALK/DECK
TO BUILDING
BOARDWALK/DECK PLANKS
WITH 1/4" +/- GAPS BETWEEN
15'
FLOODPLAIN: 986.0' (NOT SHOWN)
BUILDING WALL
BOARDWALK/DECK PILE
CAP BEAM AND
ANCHOR BRACKET
6.8
'
+
/
-
EXISTING
GROUND
UPPER BUILDING FINISHED
FLOOR ELEVATION: 998.0
HELICAL ANCHOR /
STRUCTURAL PIER
MATCH
EXISTING
GRADE
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
D
E
L
I
N
E
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
:
9
8
9
.
7
6
+
/
-
(
V
A
R
I
A
B
L
E
)
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
U
P
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
P
R
I
N
C
I
P
A
L
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
PROPOSED
GROUND
ELEVATION: 994.0
LANDSCAPE DETAILS -
BOARDWALK AND
DECK
L2.2
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
009-09-2022CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
TYPICAL BOARDWALK / DECK SECTION C - C'
TYPICAL BOARDWALK / DECK SECTION D - D'
TYPICAL BOARDWALK / DECK SECTION E - E'
PAGE 1 OF 1
Da
t
e
:
9
/
2
/
2
0
2
2
Sc
a
l
e
:
A
S
N
O
T
E
D
Revisions
#
D
a
t
e
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
M
e
a
n
d
e
r
P
a
r
k
Ch
e
c
k
e
d
B
y
:
R
o
s
s
GENERAL NOTES:
A. PULSE PRODUCTS DOES NOT ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY
FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF THIS CALCULATION OR
COMPLAINCE TO THE LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL
LIGHTNG CODES OR ORDINANCES.
B. LIGHTING LAYOUT IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS BUT ONLY TO ILLUSTRATE THE PERFORMANCE
OF THE PRODUCT.
C. ALL READINGS/CALCULATIONS SHOWN ARE SHOWN ON
OBJECTS/SURFACES.
Dr
a
w
n
B
y
:
J
e
f
f
P
l
a
t
z
k
e
,
S
a
n
d
y
A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
,
L
C
Luminaire Schedule
SymbolQtyLabelArrangementLLF
Calculation Summary
Label
DescriptionArr. WattsLum. Lumens
CalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinMax/Min
PROPERTY LINEIlluminance
2A3Single0.900RAGNI LAMPION Modern: EVO2-ASY13-48L(2x8)3000K700mA at 22.5 mounting height. Pole:20ft on a 2.5ft raised base
Fc0.070.80.0N.A.N.A.
1087811
SITEIlluminanceFc0.9313.80.0N.A.N.A.
8A3-BSingle0.900RAGNI LAMPION Modern: EVO2-ASY13-48L(2x8)3000K700mA at 15ft mounting height. Pole:15ft1087811
PARKING LOTIlluminance
1A4
Fc
Single0.900RAGNI LAMPION Modern: EVO2-ASY14-48L(2x8)3000K700mA at 22.5 mounting height. Pole:20ft on a 2.5ft raised base1087809
2.1712.60.82.7115.75
12A5-2Back-Back0.900RAGNI LAMPION Modern: EVO2-CIR06-48L(2x8)3000K700mA at 22.5 mounting height. Pole:20ft on a 2.5ft raised base2167801
Plan View
Scale: 1 inch= 50 Ft.
NO PARKING
NO PARKING
4,
9
7
5
S
F
RE
S
T
A
U
R
A
N
T
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
231 TOTAL PARKING SPACES
PLAY AREA
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
(S
T
O
R
A
G
E
/
D
A
T
A
C
E
N
T
E
R
)
6,
9
9
6
S
F
B
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
PL
U
S
15
,
1
5
0
S
F
EV
E
N
T
V
E
N
U
E
9,
6
0
0
S
F
RE
T
A
I
L
7,
5
0
0
S
F
DA
Y
C
A
R
E
NO PARKING
NO PARKING
MBMBMBMB
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A3
A3
A4
A3-B
A3-B
A3-B
A3-B
A3-B
A3-B
A3-B
A3-B
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.7 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 1.0 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.0 2.6 1.8 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.4 0.5 0.7 1.2 3.1 12.6 7.3 3.2 2.8 3.8 4.8 2.4 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.4 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.3 2.3 3.6 3.6 3.5 2.3 2.3 3.5 4.6 2.8 1.4 0.50.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.6 1.2 1.5 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 2.1 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.8 2.5 2.92.4 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.6 1.0 2.6 13.8 5.0 2.4 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.8 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.3 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.5 2.8 4.1 4.1 2.9 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.41.3 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.1 1.41.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.6 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.6 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.01.8 1.7 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.6 1.6 1.3 0.4 0.3 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.911.2 4.8 2.6 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.5 2.1 1.7 0.5 0.4 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.3 2.8 4.6 4.8 3.3 2.0 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.21.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.7 2.2 3.4 4.1 2.8 2.2 1.8 1.4 1.5 1.7 3.1 3.0 0.80.5 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.5 2.6 2.6 2.3 1.8 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.71.6 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.6 2.0 3.8 4.5 0.90.5 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.5 0.8 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.2 1.91.6 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.8 2.7 2.2 0.7 0.40.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.7 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.6 3.9 3.7 2.6 2.11.8 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.2 0.5 0.30.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.5 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.9 2.7 2.62.2 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.2 2.1 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.0 0.40.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.5 0.7 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.6 2.6 2.3 1.9 1.8 1.8 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.32.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.2 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.3 0.9 0.50.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.6 1.0 1.5 2.1 3.0 4.0 2.7 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.22.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.2 2.6 3.4 4.4 3.1 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.20.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.6 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.52.3 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.1 1.8 1.3 0.6 0.30.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.9 1.4 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.5 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.62.3 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.0 1.7 0.6 0.3 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.9 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.5 3.0 4.4 3.8 2.72.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.5 2.2 0.8 0.5 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.8 1.2 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.62.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.2 3.3 4.1 1.0 0.6 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.7 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.6 3.2 2.8 2.5 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.32.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.4 2.2 2.5 3.4 6.0 1.2 0.6 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.6 0.9 1.2 1.7 2.3 3.2 4.2 3.0 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.32.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.7 3.3 4.4 3.4 2.6 2.3 2.3 2.8 3.0 0.9 0.5 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.7 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.72.6 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.7 3.0 3.3 2.8 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.3 1.8 0.7 0.4 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.6 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.9 3.3 3.32.8 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.5 0.7 0.3 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.5 0.9 1.2 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.6 3.0 4.2 3.82.9 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 1.8 1.3 0.8 0.3 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.7 1.1 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.62.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 1.7 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.6 1.0 1.4 1.7 2.1 2.6 2.9 3.2 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.32.4 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.2 1.7 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.5 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.7 4.1 4.1 2.9 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.32.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.7 3.4 4.2 2.8 2.1 1.6 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.7 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.62.5 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.3 1.8 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.3 0.6 1.0 1.4 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.7 3.23.2 2.6 2.3 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.52.0 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.8 3.9 3.5 2.4 2.0 1.81.7 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.61.1 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.3 2.0 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.3 1.91.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.81.9 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.5 2.8 4.0 2.9 2.4 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.41.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.32.9 2.9 2.1 1.9 2.3 2.9 4.0 2.6 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.21.3 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.9 3.0 3.2 2.1 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.1 3.15.4 2.8 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.61.8 2.0 2.2 2.9 6.5 10.9 3.7 1.4 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.8 5.4 9.21.6 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 2.3 2.3 3.1 2.31.9 1.7 2.1 2.1 2.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.3 2.2 3.2 1.51.2 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.6 4.2 5.6 3.6 2.11.3 1.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.0 1.5 1.4 1.0 0.60.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 3.3 7.2 3.0 1.20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.2 1.6 1.2 0.5 0.30.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.2 2.0 3.4 2.9 3.0 2.2 1.6 1.2 0.90.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.6 2.0 1.4 0.4 0.30.3 0.5 0.9 1.4 1.9 3.5 9.2 6.8 2.6 1.30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.9 3.0 1.5 0.4 0.30.3 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.8 1.6 1.7 0.8 0.30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.7 2.3 5.4 1.3 0.6 0.30.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 2.9 12.8 1.7 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 2.3 3.3 1.0 0.5 0.20.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.9 1.5 1.3 0.3 0.2 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 1.0 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.10.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.30.50.40.30.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
UP
BASEMENT
GARBAGE
BATHROOM
ELEVATOR
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale: 1/8" 1'-0"
A100
VE
N
U
E
B
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
1/8" 1'-0"1 VENUE BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
DN
3,380 SF
CONSERVATORY
KITCHEN
ENTRY
VESTIBULE
4,610 SF
BALLROOM
SUITE
MENS
LOUNGE
ELEVATOR
SUITE
SUITE
SUITE
WOMENS
WOMENS
MENS
FOYER
BAR
SERVICE
7' -
5
"
7' -
3
3
/
3
2
"
HALL
HALL
2,870 SF
RETAIL
TRASH
VESTIBULE
OPEN TO BELOW
OPEN TO BELOW
PLAZA
BOARDWALK
LOUNGE PLAZA
GROTTO
BOARDWALK
MAIN ENTRY
PLAZA
DR
O
P
O
F
F
COURTYARD
1' -
0
"
\//\VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale: 1/8" 1'-0"
A101
VE
N
U
E
M
A
I
N
L
E
V
E
L
P
L
A
N
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
1/8" 1'-0"1VENUE MAIN LEVEL PLAN
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
2,870 SF
RETAIL
3,380 SF
RETAIL
2,870 SF
RETAIL
4,760 SF
RESTAURANT
TRASH
TRASH
PLAZA
DR
O
P
O
F
F
1' -
0
"
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale: 1/8" 1'-0"
A102
CO
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
S
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
1/8" 1'-0"1 RETAIL FLOOR PLAN
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
UP DN
DN
UP
UP
BED
LIVING
WIC
BATH
GARAGE
KITCHEN
MASTER
WIC BATH
BATHBED
ENTRY
DINING
HALL
GLASS RM
TERRACEROOF
\//\VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale: 1/4" 1'-0"
A103
DU
P
L
E
X
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
S
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
S
t
a
t
u
s
1/4" 1'-0"1BASEMENT
1/4" 1'-0"2MAIN LEVEL
1/4" 1'-0"3ROOF
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale:
A200
VE
N
U
E
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
WEST
SOUTH
EAST
NORTH
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
1/8" 1'-0"
\//\VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale:
A201
RE
T
A
I
L
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
RETAIL SOUTH
RETAIL NORTH
DAYCARE SOUTHDAYCARE EAST
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
1/8" 1'-0"
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale:
A202
DU
P
L
E
X
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
EAST
WEST
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
\//\VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale:
A300
PE
R
S
P
E
C
T
I
V
E
R
E
N
D
E
R
I
N
G
S
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
RETAIL BOARDWALKPARKING
RETAIL CROSSWALKMAIN ENTRY
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale:
A301
PE
R
S
P
E
C
T
I
V
E
R
E
N
D
E
R
I
N
G
S
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
CONSERVATORY MAIN ENTRY
GROTTOBALLROOM PLAZA
BALLROOM LOUNGE PLAZA
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
\//\VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale:
A302
PE
R
S
P
E
C
T
I
V
E
R
E
N
D
E
R
I
N
G
S
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
FRONT OF DUPLEX
REAR OF DUPLEX
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale:
G000
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
B
O
A
R
D
10
/
1
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
WHITE PLASTER
BLACK BRICK
BAR WOOD PANEL
CONCRETE
WOOD BOARDWALK
BLACK METAL RAILING
BOARDFORMED CONCRETE
RUSTIC GAP WOOD
CORTEN STEEL
STEEL
WOOD
WOOD
BLACK METAL WINDOW
CONCRETE SHOWING FORMWORK AND TIES
WOOD
STEEL
BLACK METAL WINDOW
BLACK BRICK
STONE
TILE
METAL WINDOW
STONE
BLACK METAL
WOOD
BLACK METAL HARDWARE
WOOD PANEL
TINTED CONCRETE FLOOR
BOARDFORMED CONCRETE
WOOD BENCH
WOOD BOARDWALK
CONCRETE SHOWING FORMWORK AND TIES
WOOD
WOOD DOOR
BLACK METAL FRAME
PLASTER
TINTED CONCRETE FLOOR
WOOD PLANTER GREEN WALL
BLACK METAL RAILING
RUSTIC WOOD
WOOD
BLACK METAL
RUSTIC WOOD
BLACK METAL
BLACK METAL
YELLOW WOOD
BLACK METAL STANDING SEAM ROOF
VENUE DUPLEX
DAYCARE
MIXED USE
Conservatory Close Up SouthConservatory Close Up South Night
Boardwalk Convervatory South View On Boardwalk Looking SouthwestBoardwalk Night Boardwalk View Facing East
Boardwalk View
Coming Down Boardwalk West Looking Down from Boardwalk
Conservatory View Facing Out SouthView from Highway 55 1
View from Highway 55 2
View from Highway 55 1 Night
View from Highway 55 2 Night
Southwest Water Feature
Design Board
Meander Park & Boardwalk
BAPS Page 1 of 9 November 9, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: November 4, 2022
MEETING: November 9, 2022 Planning Commission
SUBJECT: BAPS Minneapolis Medina LLC – 1400 Hamel Rd –
Amended Site Plan Review
Background
On November 16, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-78,
granting Site Plan Review approval for construction of a 46,000 s.f.
religious/assembly use at 1400 Hamel Road. During review of the Site Plan
Review, the City enacted a moratorium and studied regulations related to
rooftop architectural elements. The applicant had originally requested rooftop
elements on their proposed structures, but updated their plans to remove the
elements to abide by the interim regulations within the moratorium. The applicant had intended
to redesign the elements based on the regulations ultimately adopted by the City.
On March 1, 2022, the City adopted updated regulations related to rooftop elements and
rescinded the moratorium. The applicant has now updated their architectural plans consistent
with the updated regulations.
The applicant also proposes minor adjustments to the building footprint and parking lot layout. The
building is proposed to be in essentially same location, but the main entrance of the building was
proposed to be placed on the south of the building instead of the east. The applicant also proposes to
move the sidewalk into the center of the southern parking lot. It had previously been proposed along
the east of the parking lot. The improvements generally fall within the same footprint as previously
approved. Staff highlighted the previous location of the sidewalk in red on the first page of the
attached planset, and outlined the location of the building previously approved with a dashed green
line.
The primary change is related to the proposed architecture, which is described in the first section of
this report. The remaining information is largely unchanged from the previous approval, but staff has
updated our review review and summarized for context.
The subject site is approximately 20 acres in size, with approximately half containing wetlands. The
site is guided for Business development and zoned Business Park (BP). An existing home and barn
are located on the site and the upland areas of the site are pasture. An aerial of the subject site and
surround lands can be found at the top of the following page.
Property south of Hamel Road is zoned Rural Residential and have homes on rural lots. The
AutoMotorPlex facility and a storage building owned by Loram are located to the west. The property
north of the subject site is guided for Business development and currently farmed. A large wetland is
located east of the site, and property to the east is guided Mixed Residential and owned by Wayzata
Schools.
• 46,000 s.f. religious
place of assembly
• 20 acre site
• 10 buildable acres
• Zoned BP
MEMORANDUM
BAPS Page 2 of 9 November 9, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
Architecture - Building Materials and Design
The BP zoning district requires the following architectural standards.
Materials
The BP district requires: “All exterior building materials shall be durable and meet the following
standards:
(a) A minimum of 20 percent of the building exterior shall be brick, natural stone, stucco
(not Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product), copper, or glass.
(b) A maximum of 80 percent may be decorative concrete, split face (rock face) decorative
block, and/or decorative pre-cast concrete panels. Decorative concrete shall be color
impregnated in earth tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a
high quality terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine appearance.
(c) A maximum of 20 percent may be wood, metal (excluding copper) or fiber cement lap
siding or Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product, if used as accent
materials which are integrated into the overall building design.”
BAPS Page 3 of 9 November 9, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
The building is proposed to include the
exterior materials to the right:
Staff recommends a condition that the
concrete is “color impregnated in earth
tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a high quality terrazzo, brick, stucco,
or travertine appearance.”
Modulation
The business districts require: “Buildings shall be designed to avoid long, monotonous building
walls. Modulation may include varying building height, building setback, or building
materials/design. Generally, a particular building elevation shall include a minimum of one
element of modulation per 100 feet of horizontal length, or portion thereof. Alternative
architectural or site elements and designs may also be approved by the city which achieve the
purpose of reducing the visual impact of long building walls.”
The north and south façades are approximately 150 feet in length, requiring 2 aspects of
modulation. The west and east façades are approximately 340 feet in length, requiring 4 aspects
of modulation. The proposed architectural plans appear to exceed these minimum requirements
with horizonal and vertical modulation, plus there is additional material differentiation across the
facades.
Fenestration and Transparency
The business districts require: “Building elevations which face a public street shall include
generous window coverage. Alternative architectural elements may be approved by the city when
windows are not practical.”
The southern façade of the structure includes approximately 40% window coverage along the
first floor elevation. The main assembly space has a taller roof, and the elevation is set back
from the south building face. If you include this higher elevation, windows account for 7% of
the entire façade. However, there are rooftop architectural elements in front of this taller portion
of the structure.
Multi-sided Architecture
The business districts require: “Any rear or side building elevation which faces a public street or
a residential zoning district shall include design and architectural elements of a quality
generally associated with a front façade. The elevation(s) shall be compatible with the front
building elevation.”
The south and east facades face residential zoning districts, although the structure is more than
1000 feet from where any structures could be located. The southern façade is designed as the
“front” elevation and the eastern façade includes windows and the rooftop elements are visible as
well.
Rooftop Elements
The ordinance adopted by the City Council in March includes the following provisions for
rooftop elements:
Materials Proposed Required
Glass, stone, brick, stucco 94% Minimum 20%
Concrete 1% Maximum 80%
Metal 5% Maximum 20%
BAPS Page 4 of 9 November 9, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
“No rooftop architectural element, as described in Subd. 1(a), shall extend above the greater of
the following:
(i) ten feet above the highest point of the roof on which it is located;
(ii) a horizontal line five feet greater than the maximum building height allowed in
the respective zoning district in which it is located, as measured from the average grade
around the building; or
(iii) in non-residential districts, a vertical distance of 50 feet as measured from the average
grade around the building to the top of the architectural element”
The applicant proposes 5’ and 6’ parapets around most of the structure, which provides screening
for rooftop equipment. These parapets are consistent with the standards.
The applicant also proposes spire features on the southern portion of the building, topped with
flags. The top of the flag is proposed 50 feet above grade, consistent with clause (iii).
Proposed Use
Religious institutions are a permitted use within the BP zoning district. During previous review, the
City received public comment related to the tax-exempt status of such uses. Federal law provides
that cities may not treat religious uses any less favorably than comparable non-religious uses
irrespective of tax-exempt status and it is not relevant for the sake of land use review.
Site Layout
The proposed construction appears to meet the dimensional standards of the BP zoning district.
Following is a summary comparing the proposed construction to standards of the district:
BP District
Requirement
Proposed
Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 feet
Minimum Rear/Side Yard Setback 30 feet 30 feet (west)
Setback from Residential 100 feet 410 feet (east)
1000 feet (south)
Minimum Parking Setbacks
Front Yard 35 feet 560 feet
Rear and Side Yard 20 feet 20 feet (north)
20 feet (west)
Residential (east) 100 feet 310 (east)
630 (south)
Maximum Hardcover 70% 19%
Building Height (sprinkled) 35 feet 34 feet
Stormwater/Grading
The applicant proposes three filtration basins for stormwater management. The City Engineer
has reviewed and provided comments to address upon final plans. The application has been
conditionally approved by Elm Creek Watershed as well.
BAPS Page 5 of 9 November 9, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
The site slopes generally from the northwest to the wetland to the east. The applicant proposes
to flatten the area of the building and parking and add a retaining wall along the east side of the
driveway. However, the drainage patterns of the site mimic existing by having three filtration
basins along the east of the site.
Wetlands and Floodplains
A large wetland occupies the east of the property,
and a smaller wetland is in the southwest of the
site, with a narrow strip of land between the two wetlands. The applicant proposes 846 square
feet of impacts to the wetlands to allow access between the two wetlands to the north of the site.
The wetland requires buffers with a minimum average width to the right. The wetland protection
ordinance allows reductions in buffer width to 75% of the minimum width if an applicant
implements practices which are superior to strict adherence. The applicant proposes an
approximately 100 foot long portion of the buffer to the east of the building at 15’ in width (75%
of the minimum). The applicant proposes to exceed the total area of required buffer throughout
the site to provide the superior protection as required. Staff recommends that a minimum of 2x
area of larger buffer is provided for the reduced area (approximately an additional 500 square
feet).
FEMA floodplain maps identify a large “Zone A” floodplain within the large wetland basin to
the east. No impacts are proposed near the floodplain area, and all improvements are proposed
more than 10 feet above the elevation of the wetland.
Transportation
Peak traffic is projected on Sunday mornings for services. Traffic for remaining days will be
fairly limited. The application was routed to Hennepin County Transportation for review since
Hamel Road is a County Road. Hennepin County and the City’s Transportation Engineer have
reviewed and determined that projected traffic would not necessitate improvements or turn lanes
on Hamel Road. Hamel Road is comparatively low volume roadway and the peak traffic and
turns generated by the use occur off peak.
Staff recommends a condition that the applicant provide traffic control if requested by the City
for larger events.
The access to Hamel Road is proposed across from the shared driveway of 1405/1495 Hamel
Road.
The applicant proposes a sidewalk connection from Hamel Road to the building. The City has
identified a future trail along Hamel Road and the City Council approved of the route for the
Diamond Lake Regional Trail in this location as well. The applicant has indicated that they
would amend their grading plan to make future construction of the trail as easy as possible. Staff
has inquired if the applicant would be willing to provide trail easements.
Wetland Mange.
Class.
Average
Buffer
Minimum
Buffer
East Manage 1 30 feet 20 feet
West Mange 2 25 feet 20 feet
BAPS Page 6 of 9 November 9, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
Parking
The applicant proposes 211 parking spaces. The applicant has proposed 227 spaces on the
previously approved plan. For religious institutions and other places of assembly, the City’s
parking ordinance requires 1 space per 4 seats. This would be equivalent to 844 seats. The main
assembly place has less seating than this, but if all spaces such as classrooms and dining are
calculated, seating capacity would exceed 844. The applicant has indicated that these other
spaces are ancillary, and most will not be used to their maximum concurrently. Historically, the
peak attendance has been 250 persons, which only occurs a few times per year.
There is additional area in the southern portion of the site for additional parking if necessary.
Staff believes it is reasonable to not require excessive parking to be constructed. Staff
recommends a condition that states no improvements can be constructed in this area unless the
City determines that existing parking is sufficient.
Lighting
The City’s lighting ordinance requires light trespass to be no more than 0.2 FC at property lines
post curfew. The lighting plans appear to exceed these amounts in some locations. Staff
recommends a condition that the lighting plans be updated to comply, and staff believes the
lighting plan can be updated to comply without much issue.
Tree Preservation
No wooded areas are located on the property, although there are historically planted tree lines in
the vicinity of the house, and volunteer trees (predominantly box elder) in the area of the barn.
Trees in the remaining site are sparse. The total number of significant trees is approximately
100.
The applicant proposes to remove 8 trees for construction of access and the parking lot. The
applicant also proposes to remove 21 trees adjacent to the house and barn to allow demolition of
the existing structures.
The tree preservation ordinance would permit 10% of the trees on the site to be removed without
replacement for initial site development and 10% in connection with “other activities” on the site
beyond initial development.
If full replacement were to be required, approximately 80 inches of replacement trees would be
required. The tree preservation ordinance exempts the removal of “pioneering Tree species such
as box elder when needed to manage other ecosystems and where removal will not cause erosion
or damage to riparian areas.” Staff believes it is reasonable to not require the replacement in this
case.
BAPS Page 7 of 9 November 9, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
Landscaping
The business district includes the following landscape requirements:
• Building Setting - At least 12 feet of landscaped area shall be provided adjacent to all
buildings except for walks, plaza space and approved loading docks. Walks within this
landscaped area shall be limited to where practically necessary to serve access points of
buildings
Landscaping appears to be 12 feet or greater in width, except in the area east of the building in
the loading/unloading area. Staff believes it is reasonable to have reduced landscape area in this
location as “access points/plaza.”
• Minimum Planting
Requirement Required Proposed
Overstory trees 1 per 50’ site perimeter 82 trees 82 trees
Ornamental trees 1 per 100’ site perimeter 41 trees 41 trees
Shrubs 1 per 30’ site perimeter 137 shrubs 276 shrubs
Staff recommends that additional landscaping be provided west of the proposed building.
• Parking lot landscaping – minimum of 8% of parking lot area
Staff has estimated approximately 8% of the parking lot to be landscaping, but recommends
a condition that the applicant provide information necessary to verify.
• Landscaping islands every 20 spaces, wider separations for cells of 120 spaces
Plans appear to provide required landscaping islands and separation.
• Buffering. Landscaping is required to have an opacity of 50% adjacent to residential
zoning districts. According to the City’s bufferyard requirements, this would require
approximately 2400 “planting points” to the south and east of the structure. South of the
structure meets this requirement. The number or shrubs will need to be verified to the
east of the building to determine compliance.
Utilities, Mechanical Equipment, and Trash and Recycling Facilities
The business districts require: All utilities shall be placed underground. To the extent possible,
all utility equipment, meters and transformers shall be placed either inside of the building or
within an outside mechanical court formed by walls. If not located within the building, these
items shall be fully screened from view from adjacent property and streets through the
use of opaque landscaping or walls constructed of materials which are compatible with
the building.
The plans do not identify transformers, generators, or HVAC location. Staff recommends a
condition that these locations be identified and screening measures provided.
All trash and material to be recycled are required to be stored within the principal building,
within an accessory structure, or within an enclosed outdoor area adjacent to the principal
structure. The applicant proposes an accessory structure in the southwestern corner of the
northern parking lot for this purpose.
BAPS Page 8 of 9 November 9, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
Staff Recommendation
The City has a relatively low level of discretion when reviewing the Site Plan Review. The
purpose of a Site Plan Review is to review compliance with relevant land use regulations. If the
proposed construction meets the requirements, it should be approved. The City can apply
conditions as necessary to ensure compliance with City requirements and to protect the public
health, safety and welfare.
It is also important to note that the existing Site Plan Review is still valid. The primary
amendment is the proposed architecture of the building. The adjustments to the site layout are
relatively minor.
Subject to the conditions noted below, staff believes the plans would meet relevant requirements
and staff recommends approval.
1. The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall be in a
form and of substance required by the City Attorney and shall include the conditions
described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy.
2. All improvements installed shall be consistent with the architectural and landscaping
plans dated 10/14/2022, and civil plans dated 9/29/2021 except as may be modified
herein. The civil plans shall be updated to correspond to the updated site layout and shall
be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to commencing
construction.
3. The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the site
improvements in order to ensure completion.
4. The Applicant shall grant drainage and utility easements over all utilities, stormwater
improvements, wetlands, drainageways and locations recommended by the City
Engineer.
5. The Applicant shall execute a stormwater maintenance agreement that meets all
requirements of the City to satisfy the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed
Management Commission and ensure the long-term maintenance of all on-site
stormwater elements.
6. The Applicant shall abide by the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance,
including installation of vegetative buffers, recordation of easements, and installation of
signage. Plans shall be updated to provide additional buffer area to provide for superior
protection to account for the reduced buffer width to the east of the building.
7. The Applicant shall submit specifications confirming that proposed concrete panels are
color impregnated in earth tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a
high quality terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine appearance.
8. Lighting shall comply with the City’s lighting ordinance, limiting light trespass to 0.2 FC
after light ordinance curfew and requiring all lighting to be downcast.
9. The Applicant shall submit information to verify that landscaping occupies at least 8% of
the parking lot area.
10. Wetland impacts shall be limited to those identified in the Wetland Conservation Act
Exemption approved on September 20, 2021.
11. The number of flags displayed on the property shall abide by the City’s sign ordinance
and height shall adhere to relevant requirements of City ordinances.
12. Plans shall be updated to provide grading for future trail along Hamel Road.
BAPS Page 9 of 9 November 9, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
13. The Applicant shall identify transformer, generator, HVAC locations and provide
screening measures for review and approval.
14. The Applicant shall provide traffic control as requested by the City for larger events.
15. All comments from the Elm Creek Watershed District shall be addressed.
16. All comments from the City Engineer shall be addressed.
17. All comments from the Fire Chief shall be addressed.
18. The site plan review approval shall be effective for one year and thereafter shall be
considered null and void. Notwithstanding the forgoing timeline, construction of the
4500 s.f. and 1000 s.f. expansions on the architectural plans shall not require Site Plan
Reivew approval if constructed within five years of the date of this approval, but shall be
subject to administrative approval by City staff for compliance with the conditions
contained herein.
19. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for
the cost of reviewing the site plan review and reviewing and preparing related documents.
Potential Action
If the Planning Commission finds that, subject the conditions, the proposed construction meets
relevant standards, the following action would be appropriate:
Move to recommend approval of the amendment to the BAPS site plan review subject
to the conditions noted in the staff report.
Attachments
1. Resolution 2021-78
2. Engineering comments dated 8/26/2021
3. Site and Civil Plans (note: Grading and Utility plan were from previously approved plan
for reference; Have not been updated with new layout)
4. Architectural Plans
Resolution No. 2021-78
November 16, 2021
Member _Reid____ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-78
RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN REVIEW
TO BAPS MINNEAPOLIS LLC AT 1400 HAMEL ROAD
WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, organized and
existing under the laws of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Leslie Borg is the fee owner of property located at 1400 Hamel Road (the
“Property”), which is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, BAPS Minneapolis LLC (the “Applicant”) intends to purchase the Property
to construct a building with an area of approximately 46,000 square feet building and ancillary site
improvements for a religious/assembly use; and
WHEREAS, City regulations require approval of a Site Plan Review for such
construction; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested approval of a Site Plan pursuant to City
regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Site Plan on September 14, 2021,
reviewed the information provided by the Applicant and City staff, heard testimony from interested
parties, and recommended approval of the site plan review; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed site plan, considered the Planning
Commission recommendation, and heard additional testimony on October 5, 2021, October 19,
2021 and November 3, 2021; and
WHEREAS, subject to the fulfillment of the conditions noted below, the City Council has
determined that the proposed construction is consistent with applicable City requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota
hereby grants approval of the proposed Site Plan Review and the Conditional Use Permit, subject
to the following terms and conditions:
1) The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall be in a
form and of substance required by the City Attorney and shall include the conditions
described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy.
2) All improvements installed shall be consistent with the architectural plans dated 10/27/2021,
landscaping plans dated 10/11/2021, and civil plans dated 9/29/2021 except as may be
Resolution No. 2021-78 2
November 16, 2021
modified herein. The design of all improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer prior to commencing construction.
3) The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the site improvements
in order to ensure completion.
4) The Applicant shall grant drainage and utility easements over all utilities, stormwater
improvements, wetlands, drainageways and locations recommended by the City Engineer.
5) The Applicant shall execute a stormwater maintenance agreement that meets all requirements
of the City to satisfy the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed Management
Commission and ensure the long-term maintenance of all on-site stormwater elements.
6) The Applicant shall abide by the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance, including
installation of vegetative buffers, recordation of easements, and installation of signage. Plans
shall be updated to provide additional buffer area to provide for superior protection to
account for the reduced buffer width to the east of the building.
7) The Applicant shall submit specifications confirming that proposed concrete panels are color
impregnated in earth tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a high quality
terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine appearance.
8) Lighting shall comply with the City’s lighting ordinance, limiting light trespass to 0.2 FC
after light ordinance curfew and requiring all lighting to be downcast.
9) Wetland impacts shall be limited to those identified in the Wetland Conservation Act
Exemption approved on September 20, 2021.
10) The number of flags displayed on the property shall abide by the City’s sign ordinance and
height shall adhere to relevant requirements of City ordinances.
11) Plans shall be updated to provide grading for future trail along Hamel Road.
12) The Applicant shall identify transformer, generator, HVAC locations and provide screening
measures for review and approval.
13) The Applicant shall provide traffic control as requested by the City for larger events.
14) All comments from the Elm Creek Watershed District shall be addressed.
15) All comments from the City Engineer shall be addressed.
16) All comments from the Fire Chief shall be addressed.
17) The site plan review approval shall be effective for one year and thereafter shall be
considered null and void.
18) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the
cost of reviewing the site plan review and reviewing and preparing related documents.
Dated: November 16, 2021
By: ________________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
By: _________________________________________
Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator-Deputy Clerk
Resolution No. 2021-78 3
November 16, 2021
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
___Cavanaugh__ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
DesLauriers, Albers, Cavanaugh, Reid, Martin
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2021-78 4
November 16, 2021
Exhibit A
Legal Description of the Property
K:\018775-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-20 Submittal\_2021-08-26 BAPS Temple Concept Plan - WSB Comments.docx
70
1
X
E
N
I
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
|
SU
I
T
E
3
0
0
| M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
,
M
N
|
55
4
1
6
|
76
3
.
5
4
1
.
4
8
0
0
|
W
S
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
August 26, 2021
Mr. Dusty Finke
City Planning Director
City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340-9790
Re: BAPS Hindu Temple Site Plan Review – Engineering Plan Review
City Project No. LR-21-300
WSB Project No. 018775-000
Dear Mr. Finke:
WSB staff have reviewed the BAPS Hindu Temple site plan submittal dated August 19, 2021.
The plans propose to construct one building and 250 total parking spaces spread out between
two parking areas. The proposed project will generate approximately 3.81 acres of new
impervious on the existing 20-acre site located at 1400 Hamel Road.
The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina’s general
engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with
regards to engineering and stormwater management matters.
General
1. Comments on the landscaping plans will be provided under separate cover by City Staff.
2. The City Fire Marshall will provide pertinent comments under separate cover.
3. Provide an easement for a future regional trail along Hamel Road; see additional
comments from City Planner.
4. Any work within Hennepin County right of way will require a permit, add a note to the plan
to this affect. The applicant shall also meet the requirements of the County’s plat review
committee.
Existing Conditions & Demolition Plans (C2.0,1 C2.02)
5. Note existing FES invert to the northeast of the site.
6. Impact to the adjacent site is proposed for a watermain looping connection. Show the
infrastructure removals/impacts with this work.
7. Show any proposed removals/impacts to Hamel Road.
Site Plan (C3.01)
8. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building
structures and required turn around space as required by the Fire Marshall.
9. Note dimension of proposed sidewalk. Add a 5’ boulevard between the back of curb and
sidewalk along the southerly access driveway.
City of Medina – BAPS Hindu Temple Plan Review – Engineering Review
August 26, 2021
Page 2
K:\018775-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-20 Submittal\_2021-08-26 BAPS Temple Concept Plan - WSB Comments.docx
Grading Plan & Notes (C4.01, C4.02)
10. Retaining walls greater than 4’ in height will required certified engineering drawings/plans
form a registered structural engineer. A safety fence/guardrail will be required at the top
of the wall. Provide soil borings/geotechnical analysis for the area where the wall is
proposed.
11. There appears to be a low point in the parking lot near the southeast corner of the
building where collection/conveyance is not being provided. Review and update plans
accordingly.
12. Confirm inlet capacity for catch basins at the low point for the south entrance driveway.
13. Label more of the proposed contours near the northerly and westerly property lines.
14. Maintain all surface grades within the minimum of 2% and maximum 33% slopes.
Vegetated swale grades shall also be a minimum of 2.0%.
15. Locations where an EOF, Rain Guardian, or other concentrated discharge points over
vegetated areas will require a permanent stabilization method such as rip-rap or
permanent turf reinforcement matting.
16. At EOF locations for all basins, show the grading/contours in those areas to facilitate the
overflow conveyance.
17. Incorporate/accommodate EOF locations located along the westerly property line from
the AutoMotorPlex site.
Erosion Control & SWPPP Plans (C5.01. C5.02, C5.03)
18. An NPDES permit will need to be obtained for this project and SWPPP must be
developed in accordance with the MN Construction Stormwater Permit.
19. Provide redundant perimeter control around the wetland areas. Silt fence should be
double layered to a 3 foot minimum separation and 5 foot maximum separation.
20. Erosion control blanket is required for slopes 4:1 or greater.
21. A full review of erosion/sediment control will be conducted with the final plat submittal.
Show hatching on plan where this will be required.
Utility Plan (C6.01)
22. Based on the current design, it appears the applicant will be required to apply for a permit
from DLI, provide copies to the City.
23. Hydrant locations shall be reviewed and approved of by the City Fire Marshal; typically, a
maximum of 250’ influence radius (approximately 500’ spacing) is required around
building (hose length).
24. The watermain connections to the building shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Fire Marshall. Show the location of the PIV on the plan.
25. On the final construction plans add the following notes:
o The City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred associated with
variations in the utility asbuilt plans, elevations, or locations.
o Watermain shall have a minimum of 7.5’ of cover.
City of Medina – BAPS Hindu Temple Plan Review – Engineering Review
August 26, 2021
Page 3
K:\018775-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-20 Submittal\_2021-08-26 BAPS Temple Concept Plan - WSB Comments.docx
o The City will require televising for sanitary sewer pipe installations prior to
accepting a warranty for the utility systems; provide report and video files to the
City for review.
26. Any public sanitary sewer and watermain shall be encompassed by drainage and utility
easements where located outside of public road right of way. Drainage and utility
easements will need to allow for a 1:1 trench from the invert of the utility with a minimum
of 20’ centered on the utility.
27. Consideration of future watermain looping needs and stubs for future phases or other
adjacent developments will be required.
o The watermain looping connection proposed parallel to the westerly property line
will not likely provide a significant increase in fire flow or capacity for the system.
Instead, consider eliminating this mainline and extend the hydrant at the
southerly building location directly into the existing main within the AutoMotorPlex
site to the west. Further south, maintain the proposed connection within the
AutoMotorPlex site shown on the plans but extend easterly/southerly across the
wetland to allow for a future connection with potential development of the
southerly parcel and/or a future extension/connection to Hamel Road.
o With any connection into the adjacent property; provide documentation that the
site owner (AutoMotorPlex) has approved access and disturbance to their site for
this connection.
28. The City requires that domestic and fire services are separate taps from the main. line is
extended from the exterior mainline and a curb stop installed. A separate curb stop is
required for the domestic service and gate valve (PIV) for the fire line.
29. Where proposed watermian is being connected at the existing main, a valve will be
required. At the end of the watermain extension to the northeast, add a temporary
hydrant to the end for flushing.
30. Provide dimension notes from watermain to parallel sewer mains (storm and sanitary
sewer); the minimum horizontal separate between mains is 10 feet. Where watermain
crosses any storm sewer or sanitary sewer, add a note at each location to the effect of
“Maintain 18-inch Separation, 4” Rigid Insulation”. If offsets are required where conflicts
with normal watermain pipe placement occur, add appropriate details to the plans.
31. The sewer is shown to angle into the site for the proposed connection to the building. The
City will require that the sewer is extended further east; set MH 01 so that it will be
perpendicular to the connection into the building. The grade along the northerly property
line shall be kept at minimum grade.
32. The existing sanitary manhole will need a new infi-shield installed, note as such on the
plan. Add an note for all sewer manholes to add a “flex seal” or approved equal as a
sealant to the interior chimney section.
33. The City does not allow service lines to be connected directly into manholes; connect the
4” service line to the proposed mainline along the northerly property line.
34. Label the pipe material/strength designation for sewer mains (i.e. SDR 35, SDR 26, etc.)
and class of RCP for storm sewer.
35. Within filtration areas, extend cleanouts to the base of the slope, note rim/invert
elevations.
36. Add rip-rap quantities and class notes at each flared end section and pond overflows (if
applicable).
City of Medina – BAPS Hindu Temple Plan Review – Engineering Review
August 26, 2021
Page 4
K:\018775-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-20 Submittal\_2021-08-26 BAPS Temple Concept Plan - WSB Comments.docx
37. On the final plans, note the sizes of the proposed storm sewer structures.
Construction Details Plans (C9.01, C9.02, C9.03)
38. Utilize City of Medina standard details where applicable.
39. The pavement design/typical section shall be designed to meet the City’s standard, at
minimum. The final pavement section shall be designed by a registered geotechnical
engineer for the specific soil conditions found on the site and may need to include a
thicker aggregate section and/or a sand section.
The pavement section for the primary fire truck access route shall meet a 9-ton design.
40. A full review of standard details will be conducted with the final plat submittal.
Traffic & Access
41. A review of the traffic and access implications with the proposed improvements will be
provided with future submittals.
Stormwater
42. The development will need to meet the appropriate watershed standards for Elm Creek
Water Management Commission and the applicant shall submit for the required permits
and provide copies to the City when approved.
43. The developer will need to submit a Stormwater Management Plan and modeling
consistent with City’s Stormwater Design Manual.
44. The development will need to meet the City’s volume control requirement to capture and
retain onsite 1.1” of runoff from the net new impervious surface. By satisfying the volume
requirement the water quality requirement is considered met. Follow the City’s
Stormwater Design Manual for alternative credits towards the volume requirement if
infiltration is not feasible.
o Refer to Medina’s Stormwater Design Manual for alternatives to infiltration and
the credit given to each practice.
Filtration is credited at 50%
Currently plans are showing filtration of 25,795 cf. At 50% credit for
filtration 30,438 cf will be required to be treated in the basins to meet
requirements.
45. Provide unobstructed maintenance access to all ponding facilities.
46. Refer to the City’s construction detail RG-02 for filtration basins with drain tile.
47. Clearly label on the plans and include in the legend all locations that the proposed Rain
Guardian Foxhole will be installed. Provide information on Operation and Maintenance
specifications for future maintenance.
48. Provide information on the size, type, and slope of the proposed drain tile under the
basins.
49. With final design, provide storm sewer calculations using the rational method, sizing
storm sewer for the 10-yr 24-hr Atlas 14 rainfall. Provide drainage area map for storm
sewer sizing and calculations
City of Medina – BAPS Hindu Temple Plan Review – Engineering Review
August 26, 2021
Page 5
K:\018775-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-20 Submittal\_2021-08-26 BAPS Temple Concept Plan - WSB Comments.docx
50. Provide pretreatment for the direct storm sewer outfalls to the NURP/filtration basins in
the form of 4 foot sumps per City standards
51. Maintain all surface grades within the minimum of 2% and maximum 33% slopes.
Vegetated swale grades shall be 2.0% or more. If steeper slopes are being proposed
along filtration basins provide information for stabilization methods to prevent erosion and
ensure stabilization of soils.
Wetlands
52. The concept plan shows a roadway crossing between Wetland 1 and Wetland 2. Final
design should incorporate a culvert connection to maintain hydrology between these two
wetlands. Complete.
53. The project proposes 722 sf of impact for the driveway crossing. The applicant has
submitted a WCA application to the city and it is currently under review. The project may
also require a Section 404 permit from US Army Corps of Engineers.
54. Upland buffers and buffer setbacks will be required for the project. Wetland 1 is classified
as a Manage 1 based on the City’s functional classification of wetlands and requires an
average 30-foot buffer (minimum 20 feet). The planned buffer shown is an average of 25
feet and minimum of 10 feet, which does not meet the City’s ordinance.
Wetland 2 is classified as a Manage 2 and requires a 25-foot average buffer (minimum
20-feet). The planned average buffer shown meets the City’s ordinance. The minimum
buffer (10 feet) does not meet the ordinance.
The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted
plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or
modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards.
We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if
you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet.
Sincerely,
WSB
Jim Stremel, P.E.
City Engineer
Traffic & Access
1. Hennepin County has jurisdiction for review and approval of access to Hamel Road. The
applicant has indicated that they have met with the County and after review by the County a
Traffic Study will not be required and no turn lanes would be required on Hamel Road at this time
with the proposed improvements.
2. Review of the anticipated traffic generation from the proposed improvement found that based on
ITE rates for a church with 480 seats the site would generate, 211 average weekday trips, 10
average weekday AM Peak trips, 20 average weekday PM peak trips and 260 peak Sunday trips.
The site is proposed to have 250 parking spaces which is adequate for the anticipated peak
Sunday traffic generation.
3. The guiding warrant for a 40 MPH roadway with 1,500 ADT has a threshold for right and left turns
of 20 vph and 25 vph respectively. Assuming an ADT on Hamel Road of 1150 vpd, the calculated
peak hour right and left turns from Hamel are 11 vph and left turns 9 vph respectively. The
proposed church use would not trigger the need for turn lanes on Hamel Road.
Further review with a fully developed site that includes the remaining lots to the south as a
business use would exceed the guiding warrants and turn lanes on Hamel Road highly
recommended.
4. Should traffic safety or operations at the site driveway become an issue during peak events, the
BAPS Temple will be responsible for providing temporary traffic control during the events.
50
'
B
L
D
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
35
'
P
R
K
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
F
B
B
B
J A
AA
A
L
M
N
N
N
N
NN
N
RELOCATE EXISTING SIGN
O
17
2
.
3
'
157.7'
A
TYP
O
24'
9'
TYP
9'
TY
P
30
'
195.8'
20'
TO BC
F
F
F
TYP
I
EAST WETLAND
MANAGE 2
WEST WETLAND
MANAGE 1
HA
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 40,345 SF
FFE=1000.00
2F - EAST POND
HWL100: 995.68
WQE : 994.50
BOT: 993.00
10
'
T
R
A
I
L
A
N
D
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
'
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20' D&U EASEMENT
3F - WEST POND
HWL100: 996.75
WQE: 996.50
BOT: 995.00
1F - NORTH POND
HWL100: 996.48
WQE: 994.50
BOT: 993.00
NO PARKING
NO PARKING
NO PARKING NO PARKING
EVEVEVEV EV
22
'
6'
12
'
5.7
'
15
.
7
'
21.6'
10'
6'5'
SAWCUT BITUMINOUS
MEET & MATCH
EXISTING PAVEMENT
3' CURB
TRANSITION
19.8'
66
.
7
'
80
'
25 30 14
11
Q
O
R
30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER
WETLAND EDGE
20' MINIMUM WETLAND BUFFER
30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER
WETLAND EDGE
20' MINIMUM WETLAND BUFFER
PROPOSED AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER
(SEE WETLAND SUMMARY TABLE THIS SHEET)
WETLAND IMPACT AREA 700 SF
PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER
25' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER
WETLAND EDGE
20' MINIMUM WETLAND BUFFER
EXTENTS OF 15' ALTERNATE
MINIMUM BUFFER
PROPOSED AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER
(SEE WETLAND SUMMARY TABLE THIS SHEET)
20' PARKING SETBACK
30' BUILDING SETBACK
14 26
19
8
9
13
13
11
126
9
30' BUILDING SETBACK
20' BUILDING SETBACK
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
24
'
N
19
'
24
'
19
'
19
'
24
'
19
'
B
J19'24'19'19'24'19'
I
19
'
30
'
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
20
'
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
OHWL 988.8
OHWL 988.8
WETLAND IMPACT AREA 110 SF
24'6.7
'
24
'
12
'
3.7
'
12
'
A
22
'
3
F
F
B E E
I
B
SCALE IN FEET
0 12060
NORTH
Oct 13, 2022 - 4:35pm - User:kstewart L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-C3-SITE.dwg
C3.01
SITE PLAN
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,
Minnetonka, MN office.
10/13/202258645
Joseph Bailey
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
1.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.
2.ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT “GUTTER OUT” WHERE WATER
DRAINS AWAY FROM CURB. ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS “GUTTER IN” CURB.
COORDINATE WITH GRADING CONTRACTOR.
4.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.
5.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
6.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF
EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE
LOCATIONS.
7.SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PYLON SIGN DETAILS
8.LIGHT STANDARD LOCATIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SITE LIGHTING PLAN IS DESIGN BUILD BY
CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM LIGHT STANDARD LOCATION WITH LIGHTING VENDOR.
OR SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION DETAIL AND FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF
LIGHT POLE.
9.REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, LOT NUMBERS, LOT AREAS, AND LOT DIMENSIONS.
10.ALL GRADIENTS ON SIDEWALKS ALONG THE ADA ROUTE HAVE BEEN DESIGNED WITH A MAXIMUM
LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 4.5%, AND A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 1.5%. THIS IS LESS THAN THE ADA
CODE MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 5% (1:20), EXCEPT AT CURB RAMPS (1:12), AND A MAXIMUM
CROSS SLOPE OF 2.00% (1:50). THE MAXIMUM DESIGN SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN ADA PARKING
STALL OR ACCESS AISLE IS 1.5%, LESS THAN THE ADA CODE MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN
ADA PARKING STALL OR ACCESS AISLE OF 2.00% (1:50). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY
THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD ALONG THE ADA ROUTES PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS
PAVEMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY
BETWEEN THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD VERSUS THE DESIGN GRADIENT AND COORDINATE WITH
GRADING CONTRACTOR.
11."NO PARKING" SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ALONG ALL DRIVEWAYS AS REQUIRED BY CITY.
12.STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY.
13.ANY WORK WITHIN HENNEPIN COUNTY REQUIRES A HENNEPIN COUNTY PERMIT. CONTRACTOR SHALL
OBTAIN APPLICABLE COUNTY PERMITS AND DOCUMENT RECEIPT TO CITY OF MEDINA.
CIVIL 3D MODEL LIMITATIONS
SAMBATEK'S DELIVERABLE AND GOVERNING DOCUMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE A HARD COPY
AND/OR PDF PLAN SHEETS. IF A CIVIL 3D MODEL IS GENERATED IN THE PROCESS OF PREPARING THE PLAN
SHEETS, IT IS AS A DESIGN TOOL ONLY AND NOT AS A SEPARATE DELIVERABLE. AT THE OWNER'S REQUEST,
WE WILL RELEASE OUR CIVIL 3D MODEL FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S USE. HOWEVER, ITS USE IS AT THE
CONTRACTOR'S RISK AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR STAKING OF CURB, SIDEWALK, OR OTHER HARD SURFACE
IMPROVEMENTS. IF A CIVIL 3D MODEL FOR STAKING HARD SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS IS REQUIRED, WE CAN
PROVIDE A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR REFINEMENT AND PREPARATION OF THE CIVIL 3D MODEL.
LEGEND
EASEMENT
CURB & GUTTER
BUILDING
RETAINING WALL
SAWCUT LINE
NUMBER OF PARKING
STALLS PER ROW
SIGN
PIPE BOLLARD
STANDARD DUTY
ASPHALT PAVING
HEAVY DUTY
ASPHALT PAVING
CONCRETE PAVING
PROPERTY LIMIT
EXISTINGPROPOSED
KEY NOTE
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
DEVELOPMENT NOTES KEY NOTES
WETLAND LIMITS
TREELINE
A.BUILDING, STOOPS, STAIRS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS)
B.B-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
C.NOT USED
D.CONCRETE APRON
E.FLAT CURB SECTION
F.CONCRETE SIDEWALK
G.SEGMENTAL BLOCK RETAINING WALL
H.ACCESSIBLE RAMP
I.ACCESSIBLE STALL STRIPING
J.ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN
K.TRANSFORMER
L.TRASH PAD AND 3-SIDED ENCLOSURE
M.PLAYGROUND
N.WETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT SIGN (EVERY 200')
O.FOXHOLE RAIN GUARDIAN
P.CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER (SEE DETAIL 05, SHEET C9.02)
Q.NOT USED
R.RAIN GUARDIAN BUNKER
XX
XX
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED
ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING
SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE
CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY
HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE,
INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
AREA
GROSS SITE AREA
IMPERVIOUS AREA ALLOWED
IMPERVIOUS AREA PROPOSED
BUILDING SETBACKS
FRONT YARD
REAR YARD
SIDE YARD
PARKING SETBACKS
FRONT YARD
REAR YARD
SIDE YARD
ZONING
EXISTING ZONING
PROPOSED ZONING
PARKING SUMMARY
STANDARD PARKING PROVIDED
ADA PARKING REQUIRED
ADA PARKING PROVIDED
ELECTRICAL VEHICLE PARKING PROVIDED
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED (NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS/4= REQUIRED STALLS)
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED
856,427 SF 19.62 AC (100)
599,499 SF 13.76 AC (70%)
160,993 SF 3.69 AC (19%)
50 FEET
30 FEET
30 FEET
50 FEET
20 FEET
20 FEET
BP - BUSINESS PARK
BP - BUSINESS PARK
198 STALLS
7 STALLS
8 STALLS
5 STALLS
500/4 = 125 STALLS
211 STALLS
PAVEMENT BY OTHERS
(SEE ARCHITECTURAL
PLANS)
PROPOSED POND
WETLAND SUMMARY
EAST WETLAND - MANAGE 2
AVERAGE BUFFER REQUIRED (30')
AVERAGE BUFFER PROVIDED
WEST WETLAND - MANAGE 1
AVERAGE BUFFER REQUIRED (25')
AVERAGE BUFFER PROVIDED
AREA OF WETLAND IMPACTED
52,620 SF
53,535 SF
15,084 SF
15,095 SF
846 SF
PROPOSED
WETLAND BUFFER
WETLAND IMPACT
AREA
HA
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 40,345 SF
FFE=1000.00
1000
999
100110021003
995
995
995
998
999
995
100
0
999
100
1
100
2
100
3
10
0
4
10
0
4
995
995
995
995
996
1000
998 999
10
0
0
99
9
10
0
1
10
0
2
10
0
3
10
0
4
1000100110021003 10001001
100
0
998 999
10
0
1
10
0
2
99
5
10
0
0
99
4
99
6
99
7
99
8
99
9
10
0
1
10
0
2
10
0
2
10
0
3
10
0
3
10
0
2
10
0
0
993
993
997
993
993
10
'
T
R
A
I
L
A
N
D
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
'
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20' D&U EASEMENT
NO PARKING
NO PARKING
NO PARKINGNO PARKING
EV EV EV EVEV
SCALE IN FEET
012060
NORTH
Oct 14, 2022 - 8:30am - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-L0-TREE.dwg
L1.01
TREE
PRESERVATION
PLAN
Project
Location
DateSubmittal / Revision No.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLLJMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
This certification is not valid unless wet signed in blue
ink. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of
this survey which is available upon request at
Sambatek, Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/2021 59119
John R. Workman
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
CALCULATIONS
SIGNIFICANT TREES ON SITE:*
ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVALS FOR INITIAL SITE DEVELOPMENT (10%):
TREES REMOVED FOR INITIAL SITE DEVELOPMENT:
ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVALS FOR OTHER SITE DEVELOPMENT (10%):
TREES REMOVED FOR OTHER SITE DEVELOPMENT:
REQUIRED REPLACEMENT INCHES**:
*ACER NEGUNDO AROUND BUILDINGS NOT INCLUDED IN CALCULATIONS
**SEE L1.02 FOR REPLACEMENT TREES
LEGEND
EASEMENT
CURB & GUTTER
BUILDING
RETAINING WALL
SIGN
PIPE BOLLARD
STANDARD DUTY
ASPHALT PAVING
CONCRETE PAVING
PROPERTY LIMIT
EXISTING PROPOSED
MEDINA TREE REPLACEMENT CODE
WETLAND LIMITS
TREELINE
TOTALS
76 TREES
8 TREES
(3) TREES
8 TREES
(12) TREES
31 IN
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
S
S
SANITARY SEWER
LANDSCAPE EDING
STORM SEWER
WATERMAIN
FORCEMAIN (SAN.)
YARDDRAIN
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TREE TO BE REMOVED
D
S
LS
RIPRAP
1.Significant Tree is a healthy, deciduous Tree, measuring eight (8) inches in
Diameter or greater, or a healthy coniferous Tree, measuring four (4) inches or
greater in Diameter.
2.Allowed percent of Significant Trees that may be removed: 10%
3.Number and Size of Trees to be Replaced. For Significant Trees located
within an Old Growth Forest Remnant or other significant area identified
by the Natural Resources Inventory, a Tree Replacement ratio of a
Diameter of two (2) caliper inches per one (1) inch of removed Significant
Trees and Lost Trees is required. For all other areas containing
Significant Trees, a Tree Replacement ratio of a Diameter of one (1)
caliper inch per one (1) inch of removed Significant Trees and Lost Trees is required.
4.Minimum Size of Replacement Trees. All deciduous Replacement Trees
shall be a Diameter of at least two (2) caliper inches in size. All
coniferous Replacement Trees shall be at least four (4) feet in height.
5.Identification of areas within Old Growth Remnant Forests, as defined by
the Natural Resources Inventory. If an applicant wishes to adjust the area
based on fieldwork, city staff must review and approve of any adjustment.
TREE INVENTORY
Tree
NumberSizeTree NameStatus
18Cherry - Black (Prunus serotina)Remove
28Cherry - Black (Prunus serotina)Remove
38Cherry - Black (Prunus serotina)Remove
49Cherry - Black (Prunus serotina)Remove
57Cherry - Black (Prunus serotina)Remove
66Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove
724Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve
818Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve
936Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve
108Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
1120Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
1221Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
1323Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
1410Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
1510Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
168Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
178Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
1810Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
1910Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
2010Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
2117Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
2221Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve
2322Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve
2418Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve
2510Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
2612Elm - American (Ulmus americana)Remove
2713Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve
2821Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve
2913Apple (Malus spp.)Preserve
3028Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove
3114Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Remove
3213Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove
336Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Remove
3415Box Elder (Acer negundo)Dead
358Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
3613Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
379Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
388Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
395Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
409Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
4110Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
429Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
4310Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
445Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
459Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
469Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
475Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
485Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
496Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
505Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
517Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
525Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
539Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
547Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
559Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
566Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
579Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
5810Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
598Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
606Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
6113Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
626Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve
6312Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
646Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
6511Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
6617Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove
676Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
684Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
696Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
7012Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
714Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
7215Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove
7314Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
7412Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
759Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
769Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
778Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
788Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
798Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
808Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
818Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
828Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
838Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
848Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
858Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
868Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
878Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
888Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
8911Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
9010Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
9110Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
9223Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve
9329Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Remove
9411Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
9513Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
9613Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
9714Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
985Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve
9913Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
10011Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
10111Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
10219Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve
10320Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve
1047Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)Preserve
10523Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
1069Fir - Balsam (Abies balsamea)Preserve
10718Fir - Balsam (Abies balsamea)Preserve
10813Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
10912Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
1108Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
1119Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
11211Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve
1138Fir - Balsam (Abies balsamea)Remove
11410Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Remove
11510Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Remove
HA
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 40,345 SF
FFE=1000.00
2F - EAST POND
HWL100: 995.68
WQE : 994.50
BOT: 993.00
10
'
T
R
A
I
L
A
N
D
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
'
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20' D&U EASEMENT
3F - WEST POND
HWL100: 996.75
WQE: 996.50
BOT: 995.00
1F - NORTH POND
HWL100: 996.48
WQE: 994.50
BOT: 993.00
NO PARKING
NO PARKING
NO PARKING NO PARKING
EVEVEVEV EV
10
0
5
10
0
4
10
0
6
10
0
7
10
0
8
99
2991
990
989
98
8
10
0
7
10
0
5
100
2
100
0
995
992
990
997
988
989
988
990
99
1
99
3
99
5 99
8
99
0
99
2
99
4
99
6
99
9
100
4
10
0
1
99
9
10
0
1
10
0
0
99
8
99
7
99
7
99
8
996
995
996
994
1000
1002
998
995
998
996
1003
10
0
3
10
0
3
10
0
5
10
0
6
10
0
4
10
0
3
10
0
3
100
4
1002
10
0
2
1002
1000 1002
998
10
0
1
10
0
2
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
1
10
0
4
1003100
0
995
997
999
1002
998
997
996
994
992
1004
1003
1002
1000 998
996
998100
0
100
2100
4
10
0
7
10
0
8
10
1
0
1000100110021003
1004
BL
3
PF
3
HT
3
3
HT1
PF
3
JL2
PF
SG
2
HT
3
3
JL
2
SO
1
PF
PF
43
RB
3
WP
PF
1
HL
1
JL
2
JL
2
2
SO
SO
2
HL
1
2
LR
2
LR
4
LR
3
RB
1
HL
RB
2
PF
3
PF
2
SO
5
SG
3
2
SG
JL
2
SG
3
2
PE
2
PE
2
PE
2
PE
RB
3
2
PE
PF
2
JL
1
3
RB
WP
3
2
PE
3
BS
3
LR
BS
6
LR
4
2
WP
2
BS
2
WP
BS
2 WP
2 HL
1
HL
1
HL
1
GRANITE CHIPS
GRANITE CHIPS
WP
2
BS
2
TO
2TO
5
TO
2
WHITE DECORATIVE ROCK
IN PLANTING STRIPS
GRANITE CHIPS
WHITE DECORATIVE ROCK
IN PLANTING STRIPS
WHITE DECORATIVE ROCK
IN PLANTING AREAS
GRANITE CHIPS
BL
2
BL
2HL
1
HL
2
SCALE IN FEET
0 12060
NORTH
Oct 13, 2022 - 3:51pm - User:mlong L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-L1-LSCP.dwg
L1.02
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
This certification is not valid unless wet signed in blue
ink. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of
this survey which is available upon request at
Sambatek, Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/202159119
John R. Workman
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS
ONE OVERSTORY TREE PER 50 FT
ONE ORNAMENTAL TREE PER 100 FT
ONE SHRUB PER 30 FT
TREE REPLACMENT
REPLACEMENT INCHES FROM TREE PRESERVATION PLAN (L1.01)
TOTAL TREES
LEGEND
EASEMENT
CURB & GUTTER
BUILDING
RETAINING WALL
SIGN
PIPE BOLLARD
STANDARD DUTY
ASPHALT PAVING
CONCRETE PAVING
PROPERTY LIMIT
EXISTINGPROPOSED
MEDINA LANDSCAPE CODE
PLANT SCHEDULE
WETLAND LIMITS
TREELINE
PROPOSED
117
41
213
32.5" (13)
153 TREES
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
S
S
SANITARY SEWER
LANDSCAPE EDING
STORM SEWER
WATERMAIN
FORCEMAIN (SAN.)
YARDDRAIN
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
D
S
LS
REQUIRED
82
41
137
31"
Overstory Deciduous Shade Trees and Coniferous Trees- A minimum of one tree per 50 feet, or fraction
thereof, of lot perimeter shall be required. Deciduous trees shall not be less than 2.5 caliper inches
measured four feet off ground, and coniferous trees shall not be less than six feet in height. No more than
25 percent of trees may be of a single species.
Ornamental Trees- A minimum of one tree per 100 feet, or fraction thereof, of lot perimeter shall be
required. Trees shall not be less than two caliper inches measured four feet off ground. No more than 25
percent of trees may be of a single species.
Understory Shrubs- In addition to trees, a full compliment of understory shrubs shall be provided to
complete a quality landscape treatment of the lot. The number of shrubs be less than one per 30 feet, or
fraction thereof, of lot perimeter.
TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY
SG Acer freemanii `Sienna Glen` / Sienna Glen Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 10
RB Betula nigra `Cully` TM / Heritage Birch B & B 2.5"Cal 14
HL Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline` / Skyline Honey Locust B & B 2.5"Cal 9
SO Quercus bicolor / Swamp White Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 11
BL Tilia americana `Boulevard` / Boulevard Linden B & B 2.5"Cal 7
PE Ulmus americana `Princeton` / American Elm B & B 2.5"Cal 12
CONIFERS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY
LR Larix laricina / Tamarack B & B 6`15
BS Picea glauca densata / Black Hills Spruce B & B 6`16
WP Pinus strobus / White Pine B & B 6`14
TO Thuja occidentalis / American Arborvitae B & B 7`9
ORN. TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY
HT Crataegus crus-galli `Inermis` / Thornless Hawthorn B & B 2.5"Cal 9
PF Malus x `Prairifire` / Prairifire Crab Apple B & B 2"Cal 19
JL Syringa reticulata / Japanese Tree Lilac B & B 2"Cal 13
TREE SCHEDULE
SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY
BJ Juniperus sabina `Broadmoor` / Broadmoor Juniper 5 gal 55
CJ Juniperus sabina `Monna` / Calgary Carpet Juniper 5 gal 59
PM Pinus mugo `Slowmound` / Mugo Pine 5 gal 30
PT Potentilla fruticosa `Fargo` TM / Fargo Potentilla 5 gal 134
AC Ribes alpinum / Alpine Currant 5 gal 8
HA Thuja occidentalis `Holmstrup` / Holmstrup Cedar 10 gal 17
TT Thuja occidentalis `Techny` / Techny Arborvitae 5 gal 8
GRASSES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY
CAL Calamagrostis brachytricha / Korean Feather Reed Grass 2 gal.102
KFG Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster` / Feather Reed Grass 1 gal 285
BOG Helictotrichon sempervirens `Sapphire` / Blue Oat Grass 1 gal 267
SNU Sorghastrum nutans / Indian Grass 1 gal 45
PERENNIALS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY
SBA Allium x `Summer Beauty` / Summer Beauty Allium 1 gal 353
PCF Echinacea purpurea `Rubinstern` / Purple Coneflower 1 gal 64
BLF Gaillardia x grandiflora `Arizona Sun` / Blanketflower 1 gal 188
BIG Geranium x cantabrigiense `Biokovo` / Biokovo Cranesbill 1 gal 52
PES Sedum x `Purple Emperor` / Stonecrop 1 gal 108
SHRUB SCHEDULE
RIP-RAP
GROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT
25-131 MNDOT Seed Mix 25-131 / Low Maintenance Fescue mix Seed
33-261 MNDOT Seed Mix 33-261 / Ponds and Wet Areas Seed
35-241 MNDOT Seed Mix 35-241 / Mesic Praire General Seed
GROUNDCOVER SCHEDULE
1.SUBJECT PROPERTIES ADDRESS IS 1400 HAMEL ROAD, ITS PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS
11-118-23-23-0003.
2.THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 20.11 ACRES OR 875,873 SQUARE FEET. THE AREA
AFFECTED BY RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENTS FOR THE CITY OF MEDINA AND HENNEPIN COUNTY IS 0.49
ACRES OR 21,226 SQUARE FEET. THE AREA OF THE REMAINDER IS 19.62 ACRES OR 854,647 SQUARE
FEET.
3.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED BP - BUSINESS PARK, PER CITY OF MEDINA ONLINE ZONING MAP
ACCESSED 07/30/2021.
4.THE BUILDING(S) AND EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS OF THE OUTSIDE WALL AT GROUND LEVEL ARE SHOWN
ON THE SURVEY. IT MAY NOT BE THE FOUNDATION WALL.
Parcel 1:
The East 602 feet of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 118, Range 23, lying
North of the center line of Hamel Road
Parcel 2:
The East 602 feet of the part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township
118, Range 23, lying South of a line drawn Easterly parallel with the North line of said Southwest Quarter
of the Northwest Quarter, from a point on the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter distant 528 feet Southerly from the Northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 118, Range 23
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Torrens Property
1.The bearing system is based on the Hennepin County coordinate system, NAD83 (1986 Adjust), with an
assumed bearing of N 0° 18' 53" W for the West line of NW 1
4 , Section 11 , Township 118 , Range 23.
2.FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 07/29/2021.
1. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS BASED ON NAVD88.
BENCHMARK #1
MNDOT 2722 X
ELEV.=995.36
BENCHMARK #2
MNDOT 2722 AC
ELEV.=992.10
DESCRIPTIONPROPERTY SUMMARY
BENCHMARKS
SURVEY NOTES
Project
Location
DateSubmittal / Revision No.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS,
LLC2300 FREEWAY BLVD, BROOKLYN
CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS MANDIR
IN MEDINA
MEDINA,
MINNESOTA
1400 HAMEL ROAD
DJT
1/1
08/04/21
50157
OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL WIRE
LIGHT
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
GUY ANCHOR
UTILITY POLE
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
UNDERGROUND GAS
WOOD FENCE
BUILDING LINE
CONCRETE CURB
BITUMINOUS SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE
WET LAND
SIGN
FEMA FLOOD ZONE LINE
TREE LINE
FOUND MONUMENT
FOUND CAST IRON
MONUMENT
EASEMENT LINE
SETBACK LINE
RESTRICTED ACCESS
FOUND RIGHT-OF-WAY
MONUMENT
SET MONUMENT
MARKED LS 47092
SECTION LINE
UNDERLYING / ADJACENT LOT
TIE LINE
BOUNDARY LINE
DEED DISTANCE (100.00)
CONIFEROUS TREE
TRANSFORMER
BUILDING CANOPY
GAS METER
ELECTRIC MANHOLE
ELECTRIC METER
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
CABLE TV BOX
GATE VALVE / HYDRANT
SANITARY MANHOLE
CLEAN OUT
CULVERT
SPOT ELEVATION
CONTOUR
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
WIRE FENCE
DECIDUOUS TREE
NORTH
SCALE IN FEET
VICINITY MAPLEGEND
PIN
T
O
D
R
SITE
TA
M
A
R
A
C
K
D
R
AR
R
O
W
H
E
A
D
D
R
SOO LI
N
E
R
R
55
118
200 100
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed LAND SURVEYOR
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
survey which is available upon request at Sambatek's,
Minnetonka, MN office.
08/04/21 47092
Jason J. Howard
Sep 28, 2021 - 5:07pm - User:mlarson L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Survey\Sheets\50157 -EXCON.dwg
C2.02
EXISTING
CONDITIONS
(350' OVERLAP)
10
0
5
10
0
4
10
0
6
10
0
7
10
0
8
99
2991
990
989
98
8
10
0
7
10
0
5
100
2
100
0
995
992
990
997
988
989
988
990
99
1
99
3
99
5 99
8
99
0
99
2
99
4
99
6
99
9
100
4
10
0
1
99
9
10
0
1
10
0
0
99
8
99
7
99
7
99
8
996
995
996
994
1000
1002
998
995
998
996
1003
10
0
3
10
0
3
10
0
5
10
0
6
10
0
4
10
0
3
10
0
3
100
4
1002
10
0
2
1002
1000 1002
998
10
0
1
10
0
2
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
1
10
0
4
1003100
0
995
997
999
1002
998
997
996
994
992
1004
1003
1002
1000 998
996
998100
0
100
2100
4
10
0
7
10
0
8
10
1
0
1000100110021003
1004
HA
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 45,980 SF
FFE=1000.00
1000
999
100110021003
995
995
995
998
999
995
100
0
999
100
1
100
2
100
3
10
0
4
10
0
4
-2.9
%
-1.9%
-25
.
5
%
-2
.
3
%
-2
.
2
%
-2
.
6
%
-2
.
6
%
996.71 997.15
996.74
T/W: 990.46
B/W: 998.13
T/W: 998.49
B/W: 992.07 2F - EAST POND
HWL100: 995.68
WQE : 994.50
BOT: 993.00
999.36
EO
F
1001.30
1000.87
1000.71
EO
F
995
995EO
F
NO PARKING NO PARKING
NO PARKING NO PARKING
995
995
996
998.53
998.65
998.50
998.50
997.93
997.76
997.59
T/W: 998.82
B/W: 991.29
998.02 998.74
EOF
1000
998999
998.64
EO
F
-2.0%
999.00
998.74
10
0
0
99
9
10
0
1
10
0
2
10
0
3
10
0
4
100010011002100310001001
100
0
998999
10
0
1
10
0
2
EO
F10
0
1
EO
F
10
0
2
.
2
1004.50
1003.75
1003.78
1000.20
1000.34
999.90
999.98999.23
999.07
999.88
1000.41
997.11997.39
999.78 999.90
997.22
999.68 999.67
997.81
1000.04
999.07
998.59
998.06
999.62
996.95997.43997.95
998.14998.59-2.0%
998.60
998.79998.91
1000.00-1
.
4
%
-9
.
2
%
1000.00
999.43
999.35
999.33
999.01
1000.001000.00
999.29
999.09
998.52
998.30
-7
.
6
%
1000.00
1000.00
998.09
1000.00
998.25
1000.00
998.25999.25 999.25
99
5
10
0
0
99
4
99
6
99
7
99
8
99
9
10
0
1
10
0
2
10
0
2
10
0
3
10
0
3
10
0
2
10
0
0
999.96
999.41
993
993
997
993
993
997
997.00
998.50
998.50
997.00
997.25
997.25
998.50
998.50
997.34
998.74
998.85
998.65
997.18
EOF 997.19
3F - WEST POND
HWL100: 996.75
WQE: 996.50
BOT: 995.00
EO
F
10
0
3
.
5
0
998.00
996.50
997.25
997.25996.50
1004.54
1002.99
1003.27
1002.62
1003.07
1002.42
1002.79
1003.71
1001.97
1001.20
1002.45
1002.65
1001.40
1002.17
1003.91
1F - NORTH POND
HWL100: 996.48
WQE: 994.50
BOT: 993.00
SEE MNDOT DETAIL 3113D
ON SHEET C9.02 FOR RIP RAP
QUANTITY (TYP)
SCALE IN FEET
0 12060
NORTH
Sep 28, 2021 - 5:08pm - User:mlarson L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-C4-GRADE.dwg
C4.01
GRADING PLAN
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,
Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/202153735
Pete S. Moreau
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
902.5
X902
SPOT ELEVATION
CONTOUR
RIP RAP
OVERFLOW ELEV.
CURB & GUTTER
BUILDING
RETAINING WALL
PROPERTY LIMIT
EXISTINGPROPOSED
LEGEND
WETLAND LIMITS
TREELINE
STORM SEWER
SOIL BORINGS
DRAINTILE
EOF
902.5
D
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED
ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING
SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE
CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY
HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE,
INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
2% MINIMUM SLOPE ON
VEGETATED SWALES (TYPICAL)
HA
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 45,980 SF
FFE=1000.00
2F - EAST POND
HWL100: 995.68
WQE : 994.50
BOT: 993.00
NO PARKINGNO PARKING
NO PARKINGNO PARKING
10
'
T
R
A
I
L
A
N
D
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
'
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20' D&U EASEMENT
3F - WEST POND
HWL100: 996.75
WQE: 996.50
BOT: 995.00
1F - NORTH POND
HWL100: 996.48
WQE: 994.50
BOT: 993.00
HYDRANT
6" GATE VALVE
8" x 6" TEE
4" DOMESTIC WATER SERICE
CONNECT TO EXISTING 8"
PVC C900
6"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
HYDRANT
6" GATE VALVE
6" TEE
CONNECT TO EXISTING 8"
PVC C900
GREASE INTERCEPTOR
INLET IE=990.80
OUTLET IE=990.55
MH 01
RE=1006.77
IE=988.19 S
IE=988.19 E
IE=988.09 W
163 LF -8" SDR 35
@ 0.40%
8" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
IE=991.54 N
4" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
IE=991.58
4" PVC C900
RELOCATE EXISTING
HYDRANT
39 LF -4" PVC
SCH 40 @ 2.00%
8"x4" WYE
8" SANITARY
STUB
CONNECT TO EXISTING
MANHOLE
IE=987.44
CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL
NEW INFI-SHIELD
250' HYDRANT INFLUENCE
RADIUS (TYP)
8" PVC
C
9
0
0
STUB FOR FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
6" PVC C9006" FIRE SERVICE
4" CURB STOP
6" GATE VALVE
FIRE DEPARTMENT
CONNECTION
CONNECT TO EXISTING 8"
PVC C900
TEMPORARY
HYDRANT FOR
FLUSHING
167 LF -8" PVC
SCH 40 @ 2.00%
8" GATE VALVE
COORDINATE OFFSITE
IMPROVEMENTS WITH
ADJACENT OWNER
PIV
1
2
3
4
5
99 LF -4" SDR 35
@ 2.00%
CLEANOUT
RE=1002.09
IE=988.56 S
IE=988.56 N
SEE CROSSING
TABLE ON SHEET
C6.02
6
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
10'
12
'
SCALE IN FEET
012060
NORTH
Sep 28, 2021 - 5:09pm - User:mlarson L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-C6-UTIL.dwg
C6.01
UTILITY PLAN
Project
Location
DateSubmittal / Revision No.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLLJMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,
Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/2021 53735
Pete S. Moreau
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
1.THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
"STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS" AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF
MINNESOTA (CEAM), EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THESE
SPECIFICATIONS.
a.ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL
REQUIRMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY
AND MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REQUIREMENTS.
b.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPEN, TURN OFF, INTERFERE WITH, OR ATTACH ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO
OR TAP WATERMAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE
CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF
SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE THE LIABILITY OF CONTRACTOR.
c.A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES, AND HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10-FEET,
BETWEEN OUTSIDE PIPE AND/OR STRUCTURE WALLS, IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATERMAIN AND
SEWER MAIN (BUILDING, STORM AND SANITARY) CROSSINGS.
2.ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN.
a.ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.
b.ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR-35, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
i. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES TO BUILDING SHALL BE PVC SCH 40 CONFORMING TO ASTM
D2665.
ii. ALL SANITARY SEWER REQUIRE A "FLEX SEAL" OR APPROVED EQUAL AS SEALANT FOR
INTERIOR CHIMNEY SECTION.
c.ALL WATERMAIN TO BE DUCTILE IRON - CLASS 52, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
i. ALL WATERMAIN TO HAVE 7.5-FEET OF COVER OVER TOP OF WATERMAIN.
ii. PROVIDE THRUST BLOCKING AND MECHANICAL JOINT RESTRAINTS ON ALL WATERMAIN
JOINTS PER CITY STANDARDS.
d.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE SMOOTH INTERIOR DUAL WALL HDPE PIPE WITH WATERTIGHT
GASKETS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
i. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE FOR ROOF DRAIN SERVICES TO BUILDING SHALL BE PVC SCH 40
CONFORMING TO ASTM D2665.
e.RIP RAP SHALL BE Mn/DOT CLASS 3.
3.COORDINATE ALL BUILDING SERVICE CONNECTION LOCATIONS AND INVERT ELEVATIONS WITH
MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
4.ALL BUILDING SERVICE CONNECTIONS (STORM, SANITARY, WATER) WITH FIVE FEET OR LESS COVER
ARE TO BE INSULATED FROM BUILDING TO POINT WHERE 5-FEET OF COVER IS ACHIEVED.
5.CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO
ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR WILL
BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING
DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT.
6.SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION
PRACTICES, CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE
JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE
WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL
WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION
REVIEW OF CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE
ADEQUACY OF CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
7.ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL
PLACED BENEATH THE SOD.
8.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL
DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO
CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL
CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS.
9.ALL SOILS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT SOILS ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR
THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED
BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE UTILITY BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING
ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND SOIL INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. A GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEERING REPORT HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY:COMPANY:
ADDRESS:
PHONE:
DATED:
CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THIS SOILS REPORT.
10.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF SHOP DRAWINGS FOR MANHOLE AND CATCH BASIN
STRUCTURES TO SAMBATEK. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW 5 WORKING DAYS FOR SHOP DRAWING
REVIEW.
11.CONTRACTOR AND MATERIAL SUPPLIER SHALL DETERMINE THE MINIMUM DIAMETER REQUIRED
FOR EACH STORM SEWER STRUCTURE.
12.WHERE WATERMAIN CROSSES ANY STORM OR SANITARY SEWER, MAINTAIN 18-INCH SEPARATION
AND ADD 4" RIGID INSULATION TO WATERMAIN.
13.THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED WITH VARIATIONS IN
THE UTILITY ASBUILD PLANS, ELEVATIONS, OR LOCATIONS.
14.THE CITY WILL REQUIRE TELEVISING FOR SANITARY PIPE SEWER INSTALLATION PRIOR TO
ACCEPTING A WARRANTY FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS. PROVIDE AND REPORT VIDEO FILES TO THE CITY FOR
REVIEW.
TELEPHONE
ELECTRIC
GAS LINE
FORCEMAIN (SAN.)
EASEMENT
WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING PROPOSED
STORM SEWER
CURB & GUTTER
DRAINTILE
D
SS
S LS
LEGEND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS
QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD
GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE
CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE
FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY
AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND
PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE
ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE
BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH
CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
FOXHOLE RAIN GUARDIAN
HA
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 45,980 SF
FFE=1000.00
2F - EAST POND
HWL100: 995.68
WQE : 994.50
BOT: 993.00
NO PARKING NO PARKING
NO PARKING NO PARKING
10
'
T
R
A
I
L
A
N
D
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
'
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20' D&U EASEMENT
3F - WEST POND
HWL100: 996.75
WQE: 996.50
BOT: 995.00
1F - NORTH POND
HWL100: 996.48
WQE: 994.50
BOT: 993.00
CBMH102
RE=998.65
IE=993.67 W
IE=993.67 E
CBMH104
RE=998.07
IE=994.44 S
IE=994.44 E
CBMH101
RE=998.06
IE=993.39 W
IE=995.26 S
IE=993.39 E
FES100
IE=993.00 W
OCS 201
WITH MODEL 24R
SNOUT SKIMMER
RE=996.00
IE=991.25 NW
IE=993.00 N
IE=991.25 SE
OCS 301
WITH MODEL 24R
SNOUT SKIMMER
RE=994.50
IE=991.16 SE
IE=991.16 W
IE=993.00 S
IE=991.16 NE
FES 200
IE=991.00 NW
FES 601
IE=991.97 NE
FES 600
IE=991.52 SW
27 LF - 12"
HDPE @ 0.50%
126 LF - 15"
HDPE @ 0.50%
56 LF - 15"
HDPE @ 0.50%
37 LF - 24"
HDPE @ 0.50%
46 LF - 15"
CLASS II RCP @ 0.54%
31 LF - 12"
CLASS II RCP @ 0.50%
45 LF - 12"
CLASS II RCP @ 0.52%
89 LF - 24"
CLASS II RCP @ 0.50%
CBMH103
RE=998.50
IE=994.30 W
IE=994.30 E
FES 500
IE=992.50 NW
OCS 501
WITH MODEL 24R
SNOUT SKIMMER
RE=997.43
IE=992.50 NE
IE=992.50 W
IE=995.00 NW
IE=992.73 SE
100 LF - 12"
HDPE @ 0.50%
CBMH106
RE=998.25
IE=995.52 S
IE=995.52 N
CBMH107
RE=998.06
IE=999.81 E
IE=996.06 N
CBMH101-A
RE=998.74
IE=995.48 W
IE=995.48 N
108 LF - 12"
HDPE @ 0.50%
8 LF - 12" PVC
SCH 40 @ 2.00%
CBMH105
RE=998.25
IE=995.02 S
IE=995.02 N
116 LF - 12" PVC
SCH 40 @ 0.50%
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.64
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.64
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.65
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.66
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.23
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.61
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.62
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.85
CO
RE=995.00
IE=992.99
CO
RE=995.00
IE=993.07
CO
RE=995.00
IE=992.57
CO
RE=995.00
IE=992.61
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.63
CO
RE=995.97
IE=991.38
4" PVC SCH 40 DRAINTILE @ 0.5%
4" PVC SCH 40
DRAINTILE @ 0.5%
4" PVC SCH 40 DRAINTILE @ 0.5%
CONTRACTOR SHALL
INSTALL 12” CL. II RIP RAP
WITH GEOTEXTILE FILTER
FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE
WITH STANDARD PLATE
DETAILS 3133. REFER TO
SHEET C9.01 FOR DETAILS.
(TYP)
CBMH100A
RE=997.20
SUMP DEPTH=4'
IE=993.20 W
IE=993.20 E
47 LF - 8"
PVC SCH 40 @ 2.00%
41 LF - 24"
CLASS II RCP @ 0.49%
44 LF - 24"
HDPE @ 0.50%
CONTRACTOR SHALL
INSTALL 12” CL. II RIP RAP
WITH GEOTEXTILE FILTER
FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE
WITH STANDARD PLATE
DETAILS 3133. REFER TO
SHEET C9.01 FOR DETAILS.
(TYP)
CONTRACTOR SHALL
INSTALL 12” CL. II RIP RAP
WITH GEOTEXTILE FILTER
FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE
WITH STANDARD PLATE
DETAILS 3133. REFER TO
SHEET C9.01 FOR DETAILS.
(TYP)
FES 300
IE=991.00 SW
FES 202
IE=993.00
13 LF - 15"
RCP @ 0.00%
7 LF - 12"
RCP @ 0.00%
8 LF - 12"
RCP @ 0.00%
FES 502
IE=995.00 SE
FES 302
IE=993.00 N
1
2
3
4
5
6
10'
12
'
SCALE IN FEET
0 12060
NORTH
Sep 28, 2021 - 5:09pm - User:mlarson L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-C6-UTIL.dwg
C6.02
STORM SEWER
PLAN
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,
Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/202153735
Pete S. Moreau
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
TELEPHONE
ELECTRIC
GAS LINE
FORCEMAIN (SAN.)
EASEMENT
WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER
EXISTINGPROPOSED
STORM SEWER
CURB & GUTTER
DRAINTILE
D
S S
SLS
LEGEND
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS
QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD
GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE
CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE
FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY
AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND
PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE
ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE
BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH
CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
FOXHOLE RAIN GUARDIAN
UTILITY CROSSINGS
NUMBER WATERMAIN SANITARY STORM SEPARATION
1 996.67 BOTTOM 988.65 TOP 8.01'
2 996.63 BOTTOM 988.95 TOP 7.68'
3 991.32 TOP 993.57 BOTTOM 2.18'
4 991.67 TOP 993.68 BOTTOM 2.01'
5 991.53 TOP 994.02 BOTTOM 2.49'
6 991.69 TOP 993.99 BOTTOM 2.30'
*MAINTAIN 18-INCH MINIMUM SEPARATION AT WATERMAIN CROSSINGS. PROVIDE 4" RIGID
INSULATION BETWEEN WATERMAIN AND SEWER CROSSINGS, SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C9.01.
W
D
DW
W D 1
2
LJKIGFEDC
3
4
428 SF
WOMENS
RESTROOMS 2
374 SF
MENS
RESTROOMS 2
3861 SF
SABHA HALL
19 SF
CUST
24 SF
CUST
103 SF
TABLE WARE
STOR
81 SF
EQUIP STOR
45 SF
CHANGING
98 SF
iOFFICE
231 SF
BOARD RM
1785 SF
iCORRIDOR
2474 SF
PRAYER HALL
189
S
F
VA
G
H
A
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
73 SF
PUJA
STOR/ AV
392 SF
iCLASSROOM 1
870 SF
iCLASSROOM 4/5
392 SF
iCLASSROOM 2
98
S
F
WA
L
K
I
N
CO
O
L
E
R
123 SF
PANTRY
1428 SF
KITCHEN
5179 SF
GYM/ DINING
623 SF
DECORATION W/
STORAGE
696 SF
AKSHARPITH/
SHAYONA
161
S
F
VE
S
T
2176 SF
eCORRIDOR
136
S
F
AK
S
H
A
R
P
I
T
H
ST
O
R
221
S
F
FA
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
S
T
O
R
113 SF
TELECOM/
DATA &
IT
57 SF
MECH/
ELEC
2657 SF
LOBBY
319 SF
DINING STORAGE
145 SF
STAGE STORAGE
215 SF
WOMENS
REST 1 163 SF
MENS
REST 1
148 SF
iNURSURY202 SF
ACCOUNTING
203 SF
GREEN RM
2020 SF
ADD'L SEATING
178 SF
GUEST SERV
92
S
F
MO
T
H
E
R
S
RM
1011 SF
SANT NIVAS
392 SF
eCLASSROOM 1
867 SF
eCLASSROOM 4/5
392 SF
eCLASSROOM 2
85 SF
eOFFICE
168 SF
MAIN ELEC
131 SF
WASHING
154 SF
COOKWARE
STORAGE
225 SF
AV/IT
1609 SF
STAGE
173 SF
HALL STORAGE
145
S
F
CO
R
R
I
D
O
R
82 SF
WALK IN
FREEZER129 SF
VEST
69 SF
eNURSURY
392 SF
iCLASSROOM3
392 SF
eCLASSROOM 3
59 SF
PANTRY
108 SF
CLASS STOR
108
S
F
CU
S
T
O
D
I
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
73 SF
FAMILY
TLT
82 SF
FAMILY
TLT
33 SF
STOR
34 SF
STOR
231 SF
MENS
CLOAK
231 SF
WOMENS
CLOAK
A 5.01
F177 SF
FIRE RISER
88 SF
CATERING
OFFICE 54 SF
TRASH
11
T
11
T
11
T
11
T
11
T
11
T
AR
E
A
A
AR
E
A
B
129 SF
VEST
BA2
AWNING ABOVE
A H
SKYFOLD PARTITION SYSTEM
115 SF
FACILITIES
FUTURE EXPANSION
PHASE 2
4,500 SQFT
FUTURE
EXPANSION
PHASE 2
1,000 SQFT
COURTYARD FLEX SPACE
AR
E
A
A
AR
E
A
B
M N O
10' - 0" 6' - 0" 30' - 10"30' - 0" 11' - 8" 20' - 6" 20' - 6" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 19' - 6" 19' - 6" 17' - 0"86' - 3 1/4"12' - 6 1/2"
1353 SF
PUJARI NIVAS
32
'
-
8
"
80
'
-
0
"
32
'
-
8
"
85' - 7 1/2"
61
'
-
0
1
/
4
"
BUILDING FOOTPRINT SUMMARY
CURRENT PHASE 1: 40,120 SQFT
+ FUTURE EXPANSION: 5,500 SQFT
TOTAL SQFT: 45,620 SQFT
60 SF
RESTROOM
AREA A AREA B
TRUE NORTH
AREA KEY
Project No:
F
E
D
C
B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
DIPEN PATEL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER
3600 W 153rd St.
Leawood, KS 66224
p.816.686.2234
NOTE: Please refer to contractor/engineer for
any applicable building codes.
A
MISHA PATEL
3600 W 153rd St.
Leawood, KS 66224
p.816.686.2234
INTERIOR COORDINATOR
DATE ISSUED:
OCTOBER 12, 2022
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTOR
These plans are the property of the design team. Any
reproduction of these plans in whole or part or the
preparation of derivative works thereof without the
expressed written permission of the design team is
entirely prohibited.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
CIVIL ENGINEER
MEP ENGINEER
CODE & LIFE SAFETY
A 1.01
BAPS MINNEAPOLIS
MANDIR
Medina, MN
205010
SD PHASE
FLOOR PLAN
SQFT BREAKDOWN
Name Area Department
BOARD RM 231 SF ADMIN
ACCOUNTING 202 SF ADMIN
GUEST SERV 178 SF ADMIN
AKSHARPITH/ SHAYONA 696 SF AKSHARPITH
AKSHARPITH STOR 136 SF AKSHARPITH
WOMENS RESTROOMS 2 428 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
CUST 19 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
CUST 24 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MENS RESTROOMS 2 374 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
DECORATION W/ STORAGE 623 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
FACILITIES STOR 221 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
TELECOM/ DATA & IT 113 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MECH/ ELEC 57 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
WOMENS REST 1 215 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
WOMENS CLOAK 231 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MENS REST 1 163 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MAIN ELEC 168 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
CLASS STOR 108 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
CUSTODIAL SERVICES 108 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MENS CLOAK 231 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
FIRE RISER 77 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
FACILITIES 115 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
iCORRIDOR 1785 SF CIRCULATION
VEST 161 SF CIRCULATION
eCORRIDOR 2176 SF CIRCULATION
LOBBY 2657 SF CIRCULATION
CORRIDOR 145 SF CIRCULATION
VEST 129 SF CIRCULATION
STOR 33 SF CIRCULATION
STOR 34 SF CIRCULATION
VEST 129 SF CIRCULATION
iOFFICE 98 SF CLASSROOMS
iCLASSROOM 1 392 SF CLASSROOMS
iCLASSROOM 4/5 870 SF CLASSROOMS
iCLASSROOM 2 392 SF CLASSROOMS
eCLASSROOM 1 392 SF CLASSROOMS
eCLASSROOM 4/5 867 SF CLASSROOMS
eCLASSROOM 2 392 SF CLASSROOMS
eOFFICE 85 SF CLASSROOMS
iCLASSROOM3 392 SF CLASSROOMS
eCLASSROOM 3 392 SF CLASSROOMS
TABLE WARE STOR 103 SF GYMNASIUM
EQUIP STOR 81 SF GYMNASIUM
GYM/ DINING 5179 SF GYMNASIUM
DINING STORAGE 319 SF GYMNASIUM
CHANGING 45 SF KITCHEN
WALK IN COOLER 98 SF KITCHEN
PANTRY 123 SF KITCHEN
KITCHEN 1428 SF KITCHEN
WASHING 131 SF KITCHEN
COOKWARE STORAGE 154 SF KITCHEN
WALK IN FREEZER 82 SF KITCHEN
CATERING OFFICE 88 SF KITCHEN
TRASH 54 SF KITCHEN
PRAYER HALL 2474 SF PRAYER
VAGHA STORAGE 189 SF PRAYER
PUJA STOR/ AV 73 SF PRAYER
SABHA HALL 3861 SF SABHA HALL
STAGE STORAGE 145 SF SABHA HALL
iNURSURY 148 SF SABHA HALL
GREEN RM 203 SF SABHA HALL
ADD'L SEATING 2020 SF SABHA HALL
MOTHERS RM 92 SF SABHA HALL
AV/IT 225 SF SABHA HALL
STAGE 1609 SF SABHA HALL
HALL STORAGE 173 SF SABHA HALL
eNURSURY 69 SF SABHA HALL
FAMILY TLT 73 SF SABHA HALL
FAMILY TLT 82 SF SABHA HALL
SANT NIVAS 1011 SF STAFF
PANTRY 59 SF STAFF
PUJARI NIVAS 1353 SF STAFF
Grand total: 72 37981 SF
1/16" = 1'-0"F1 FLOOR PLAN
W
D
WD1
2
I G F E D C
3
4
25' - 9 1/4"
3861 SF SABHA HALL
98 SF iOFFICE
231 SF BOARD RM
1785 SF iCORRIDOR
2474 SF PRAYER HALL
189
S
F
VA
G
H
A
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
73 SF PUJA STOR/ AV
392 SF iCLASSROOM 1392 SF iCLASSROOM 2
623 SF
DECORATION W/
STORAGE
696 SF
AKSHARPITH/
SHAYONA
161
S
F
VE
S
T
2176 SF eCORRIDOR
136 SF
AKSHARPITH
STOR
113 SF
TELECOM/
DATA &
IT
57 SF MECH/ ELEC
2657 SF LOBBY
215 SF WOMENS REST 1
163 SF MENS REST 1
148 SF iNURSURY 202
S
F
AC
C
O
U
N
T
I
N
G
2020 SF ADD'L SEATING
178 SF GUEST SERV
92 SF MOTHERS RM
1011 SF SANT NIVAS
392 SF eCLASSROOM 1392 SF eCLASSROOM 2
85 SF eOFFICE
225 SF AV/IT
1609 SF STAGE
173 SF HALL STORAGE
145
S
F
CO
R
R
I
D
O
R
69 SF eNURSURY
392 SF iCLASSROOM3
392 SF eCLASSROOM 3
59 SF PANTRY
108 SF
CUSTODIAL
SERVICES
73 SF FAMILY TLT
33 SF STOR34 SF STOR
33
'
-
3
1
/
4
"
231 SF MENS CLOAK
231 SF WOMENS CLOAK
AR
E
A
A
AR
E
A
B
270 CHAIR STORAGE
54 CHAIRS 51 CHAIRS
60 CHAIRS 50 CHAIRS
54 CHAIRS
51 CHAIRS
192 CHAIRS
SKYFOLD PARTITION SYSTEM
SABHA HALL SEATING NOTES
516 CHAIR SEATING CAPACITY
324 ON FRONT HALF
192 ON BACK HALF
24
'
-
4
"
17' - 6"20' - 0"20' - 0"
15' - 9"
9' - 6"22' - 0"9' - 6"17' - 0"17' - 0"
AR
E
A
A
AR
E
A
B
11
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
12
'
-
4
"
15' - 4 1/4"
3'
-
0
3
/
4
"
15
'
-
1
0
3
/
4
"
24' - 0"
6' - 0"
2'
-
9
"
5'
-
0
"
B A2 A
INFO SCREENS
TRANSACTION WINDOW
6' - 0" 13' - 0" 8' - 8 1/2" 13' - 9"
11
'
-
5
1
/
4
"
4' - 3" 11' - 8"20' - 6" 5' - 6" 7' - 6" 7' - 6" 1' - 0" 24' - 0 1/4" 1' - 0" 7' - 3 3/4" 8"
A 5.02
2
A 5.02
4
STORAGE
PROVIDE SINK
FOR ABHISHEK
8'
-
1
1
1
/
2
"
7'
-
4
1
/
2
"
4' - 0" 9' - 4"
21
'
-
7
"
9' - 4"20' - 11 1/2" 7' - 8 1/2" 5' - 3 3/4" 7' - 0" 16' - 0 1/2" 10' - 4 1/4" 5' - 3 3/4" 9' - 3 3/4" 17' - 0"17' - 0"
10' - 0" 6' - 0"30' - 10"30' - 0"11' - 8"20' - 6"20' - 6"17' - 0"17' - 0"
NEELKANTH
VARNI ABHISHEK
20' - 3"9' - 0" 15' - 0" 8' - 11" 5' - 6" 7' - 6" 8' - 2"24' - 1" 1' - 0" 7' - 6"
16
'
-
8
1
/
4
"
53
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
1
0
"
H
10
'
-
0
"
35
'
-
5
1
/
4
"
10
'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
4
'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
2'
-
0
"
1
6
'
-
0
"
300 SHOE STOR
4'
-
0
"
6'
-
0
"
2
'
-
9
"
24' - 0"
SINHASAN
14' - 5"
16
'
-
8
1
/
4
"
AWNING ABOVE
CURTAIN TRACK
ABOVE
CURTAIN TRACK ABOVE
W/DECORATIVE GUARD RAIL
10
'
-
9
1
/
2
"
2'
-
6
"
13
'
-
3
1
/
2
"
11
'
-
0
1
/
2
"
8'
-
4
"
8'
-
4
"
12' - 4 3/4" 8' - 8 3/4" 8' - 9 3/4" 2' - 6" 11' - 8" 9' - 3 3/4"
2'
-
3
1
/
4
"
7
'
-
4
3
/
4
"
9"
SO
U
N
D
LIG
H
T
I
N
G
VI
D
E
O
11
'
-
0
1
/
2
"
26' - 4 3/4"
PROVIDE
MICROWAVE
& MINIFRIDGE
6' - 0"
13
'
-
2
"
24
'
-
4
"
3'
-
6
"
12
'
-
4
"
12
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
4
"
8
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
6' - 6" 7' - 6"
14' - 0"
6'
-
6
"
12' - 7"
6' - 5" 16' - 4 3/4"7'
-
0
"
4'
-
0
"
7' - 0"
3' - 6"
1353 SF PUJARI NIVAS
12
'
-
3
"
9' - 8 1/4"
47' - 1 1/2"
12
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
6' - 0"24' - 9 1/2"6' - 0"
35
'
-
4
1
/
4
"
7' - 10 1/2" 20' - 2 1/2"
WICWIC
7'
-
0
"
53
'
-
0
"
7'
-
0
"
38' - 8 3/4"55' - 0 1/4"
93' - 9"
67
'
-
0
"
9'
-
8
1
/
4
"
24
'
-
4
"
8'
-
4
"
4'
-
1
0
"
ISLAND
MUDROOM
STOR
LAUNDRY W/
DRYING RODS
ABOVE
OFFICEOFFICE
PROVIDE DEDICATED COOLING FOR SERVER LOCATION
PROVIDE FLOOR
DRAIN FOR BOILERS,
ZONE TO SERVE ALL
PUBLIC RESTROOMS
PROVIDE FLOOR
DRAIN FOR BOILERS,
ZONE TO SERVE
SANT NIVAS &
PUJARI NIVAS
10
'
-
0
"
6'
-
9
3
/
4
"
7'
-
6
"
60 SF RESTROOMWHITEBOARD, TV PER
ENLARGED DETAIL
AREA AAREA B
TRUE NORTH
AREA KEY
Project No:
F
E
D
C
B
12345678
DIPEN PATEL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER
3600 W 153rd St.
Leawood, KS 66224
p.816.686.2234
NOTE: Please refer to contractor/engineer for
any applicable building codes.
A
MISHA PATEL
3600 W 153rd St.
Leawood, KS 66224
p.816.686.2234
INTERIOR COORDINATOR
DATE ISSUED:
OCTOBER 12, 2022
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTOR
These plans are the property of the design team. Any
reproduction of these plans in whole or part or the
preparation of derivative works thereof without the
expressed written permission of the design team is
entirely prohibited.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
CIVIL ENGINEER
MEP ENGINEER
CODE & LIFE SAFETY
A 1.01A
BAPS MINNEAPOLIS
MANDIR
Medina, MN
205010
SD PHASE
FLOOR PLAN- AREA A
SQFT BREAKDOWN
Name Area Department
BOARD RM 231 SF ADMIN
ACCOUNTING 202 SF ADMIN
GUEST SERV 178 SF ADMIN
AKSHARPITH/ SHAYONA 696 SF AKSHARPITH
AKSHARPITH STOR 136 SF AKSHARPITH
WOMENS RESTROOMS 2 428 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
CUST 19 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
CUST 24 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MENS RESTROOMS 2 374 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
DECORATION W/ STORAGE 623 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
FACILITIES STOR 221 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
TELECOM/ DATA & IT 113 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MECH/ ELEC 57 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
WOMENS REST 1 215 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
WOMENS CLOAK 231 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MENS REST 1 163 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MAIN ELEC 168 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
CLASS STOR 108 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
CUSTODIAL SERVICES 108 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MENS CLOAK 231 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
FIRE RISER 77 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
FACILITIES 115 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
iCORRIDOR 1785 SF CIRCULATION
VEST 161 SF CIRCULATION
eCORRIDOR 2176 SF CIRCULATION
LOBBY 2657 SF CIRCULATION
CORRIDOR 145 SF CIRCULATION
VEST 129 SF CIRCULATION
STOR 33 SF CIRCULATION
STOR 34 SF CIRCULATION
VEST 129 SF CIRCULATION
iOFFICE 98 SF CLASSROOMS
iCLASSROOM 1 392 SF CLASSROOMS
iCLASSROOM 4/5 870 SF CLASSROOMS
iCLASSROOM 2 392 SF CLASSROOMS
eCLASSROOM 1 392 SF CLASSROOMS
eCLASSROOM 4/5 867 SF CLASSROOMS
eCLASSROOM 2 392 SF CLASSROOMS
eOFFICE 85 SF CLASSROOMS
iCLASSROOM3 392 SF CLASSROOMS
eCLASSROOM 3 392 SF CLASSROOMS
TABLE WARE STOR 103 SF GYMNASIUM
EQUIP STOR 81 SF GYMNASIUM
GYM/ DINING 5179 SF GYMNASIUM
DINING STORAGE 319 SF GYMNASIUM
CHANGING 45 SF KITCHEN
WALK IN COOLER 98 SF KITCHEN
PANTRY 123 SF KITCHEN
KITCHEN 1428 SF KITCHEN
WASHING 131 SF KITCHEN
COOKWARE STORAGE 154 SF KITCHEN
WALK IN FREEZER 82 SF KITCHEN
CATERING OFFICE 88 SF KITCHEN
TRASH 54 SF KITCHEN
PRAYER HALL 2474 SF PRAYER
VAGHA STORAGE 189 SF PRAYER
PUJA STOR/ AV 73 SF PRAYER
SABHA HALL 3861 SF SABHA HALL
STAGE STORAGE 145 SF SABHA HALL
iNURSURY 148 SF SABHA HALL
GREEN RM 203 SF SABHA HALL
ADD'L SEATING 2020 SF SABHA HALL
MOTHERS RM 92 SF SABHA HALL
AV/IT 225 SF SABHA HALL
STAGE 1609 SF SABHA HALL
HALL STORAGE 173 SF SABHA HALL
eNURSURY 69 SF SABHA HALL
FAMILY TLT 73 SF SABHA HALL
FAMILY TLT 82 SF SABHA HALL
SANT NIVAS 1011 SF STAFF
PANTRY 59 SF STAFF
PUJARI NIVAS 1353 SF STAFF
Grand total: 72 37981 SF
1/8" = 1'-0"1FLOOR PLAN- AREA A
DW
1
2
LJKI
3
4
428 SF
WOMENS
RESTROOMS 2
374 SF
MENS
RESTROOMS 2
19 SF
CUST
24 SF
CUST
103 SF
TABLE WARE
STOR
81 SF
EQUIP STOR
45 SF
CHANGING
870 SF
iCLASSROOM 4/5
392 SF
iCLASSROOM 2
98
S
F
WA
L
K
I
N
C
O
O
L
E
R
123 SF
PANTRY
1428 SF
KITCHEN
5179 SF
GYM/ DINING
221 SF
FACILITIES STOR
319 SF
DINING STORAGE
145 SF
STAGE STORAGE
203 SF
GREEN RM
867 SF
eCLASSROOM 4/5
392 SF
eCLASSROOM 2
168 SF
MAIN ELEC
131 SF
WASHING
154 SF
COOKWARE
STORAGE
1609 SF
STAGE
82
S
F
WA
L
K
I
N
FR
E
E
Z
E
R
129 SF
VEST
392 SF
iCLASSROOM3
392 SF
eCLASSROOM 3
108 SF
CLASS STOR73 SF
FAMILY TLT
82 SF
FAMILY TLT
34 SF
STOR
77 SF
FIRE RISER
88 SF
CATERING OFFICE 54 SF
TRASH
11
T
11
T
11
T
11
T
11
T
11
T
AR
E
A
A
AR
E
A
B
129 SF
VEST
21' - 4"
A 5.01
F1
PROVIDE EXHAUST
& EPOXY FLOOR
17' - 0"39' - 9"
17' - 0"19' - 6"19' - 6"17' - 0"86' - 3 1/4"12' - 6 1/2"
1' - 0"
17' - 0" 4' - 6" 12' - 6" 5' - 0" 4' - 6" 13' - 0" 3"
7' - 0"25' - 0"6' - 1 3/4" 14' - 0 1/2"22' - 1 1/2"84' - 10 1/2"14' - 3 1/2"
12
'
-
0
"
17' - 0"39' - 9"
8' - 8 1/2" 8' - 3 1/2"21' - 1 3/4"
12' - 8"19' - 8" 6' - 6" 17' - 3" 7' - 2 1/4" 9' - 9"
13
'
-
9
"
8'
-
2
"
11
'
-
9
"
8' - 0"
10
'
-
0
"
8'
-
4
"
1
1
'
-
4
"
1
3
'
-
6
"
7'
-
1
1
3
/
4
"
25
'
-
0
"
13
'
-
4
"
6
'
-
4
"
8
'
-
6
1
/
4
"
8' - 9" 16' - 2"13' - 4" 8' - 0"
3'
-
0
"
13' - 4"
24
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
8'
-
3
1
/
2
"
22
'
-
2
1
/
2
"
7'
-
4
"
20
'
-
7
"
22
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
7'
-
3
3
/
4
"
9
'
-
9
"
24
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
7' - 0"
4'
-
1
"
6' - 3"
17' - 0" 4' - 6" 12' - 6" 5' - 0" 4' - 6" 13' - 0"
13
'
-
0
1
/
2
"
50
'
-
5
1
/
4
"
10
'
-
6
1
/
2
"
7'
-
6
"
8'
-
5
"
9'
-
7
1
/
2
"
FUTURE EXPANSION
PHASE 2
4,500 SQFT
FUTURE EXPANSION
PHASE 2
1,000 SQFT
COURTYARD FLEX SPACE
85 SHOE STOR
COAT RACK
7'
-
0
"
85 SHOE STOR
COAT RACK
PLAYGROUND FLEX SPACE
61
'
-
3
1
/
4
"
50' - 7"
M N O
115 SF
FACILITIES
8' - 0"
SEE ENLARGED KITCHEN PLAN
24
'
-
4
"
8'
-
4
"
2' - 6" 12' - 0" 2' - 6" 2' - 6" 12' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0"12' - 0" 2' - 6"
AR
E
A
A
AR
E
A
B
AR
E
A
A
AR
E
A
B
AR
E
A
A
AR
E
A
B
PROVIDE FLOOR DRAIN FOR
BOILERS, ZONE TO SERVE KITCHEN
40" HIGH
8' - 3 3/4" 2' - 8" 4' - 0" 20' - 0" 4' - 0" 8' - 0" 4' - 0" 20' - 0" 4' - 0" 2' - 8" 7' - 11 3/4"
85' - 0"
AREA A AREA B
TRUE NORTH
AREA KEY
Project No:
F
E
D
C
B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
DIPEN PATEL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER
3600 W 153rd St.
Leawood, KS 66224
p.816.686.2234
NOTE: Please refer to contractor/engineer for
any applicable building codes.
A
MISHA PATEL
3600 W 153rd St.
Leawood, KS 66224
p.816.686.2234
INTERIOR COORDINATOR
DATE ISSUED:
OCTOBER 12, 2022
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTOR
These plans are the property of the design team. Any
reproduction of these plans in whole or part or the
preparation of derivative works thereof without the
expressed written permission of the design team is
entirely prohibited.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
CIVIL ENGINEER
MEP ENGINEER
CODE & LIFE SAFETY
A 1.01B
BAPS MINNEAPOLIS
MANDIR
Medina, MN
205010
SD PHASE
FLOOR PLAN- AREA B
1/8" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN- AREA B
GROUND FLOOR
1002' -0"
T.O. ROOF
1036' -0"
LOWER ROOF
1014' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
1042' -0"
LOWER PARAPET
1019' -0"
LJKIGFEDCBA2AH M N O
16' - 0"30' - 10"30' - 0"11' - 8"20' - 6"20' - 6"17' - 0"17' - 0"17' - 0"19' - 6"19' - 6"17' - 0"86' - 3 1/4"12' - 6 1/2"
T.O. SPIRE
1052' -0"
12
'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
17
'
-
0
"
6'
-
0
"
10
'
-
0
"
ORNAMENTAL
FIBERGLASS
ELEMENTS
CORRUGATED
METAL PANEL, DARK
CONCEALED FASTENER
VERTICAL METAL PANELSTANDING SEAM
METAL ROOF
SLATE RAIN-SCREEN CLADDING WOOD LOOK METAL PANELHEAVY TIMBER COLUMNS
ALUMINUM STORE FRONT SYSTEM
CORRUGATED
METAL PANEL, DARK
ALUMINUM
STOREFRONT
SYSTEM
GROUND FLOOR
1002' -0"
T.O. ROOF
1036' -0"
LOWER ROOF
1014' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
1042' -0"
LOWER PARAPET
1019' -0"
1 2 3 4
T.O. SPIRE
1052' -0"10
'
-
0
"
6
'
-
0
"
1
7
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
1
2
'
-
0
"
32' - 8"80' - 0"32' - 8"
ORNAMENTAL
FIBERGLASS
ELEMENTS (BEYOND)
METAL AWNING
ABOVE DOOR
STUCCO
ALUMINUM STORE FRONT
ENTRY SYSTEM
WOOD LOOK METAL PANEL SLATE CLADDING
METAL AWNING
ABOVE DOOR
GROUND FLOOR
1002' -0"
T.O. ROOF
1036' -0"
LOWER ROOF
1014' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
1042' -0"
LOWER PARAPET
1019' -0"
L JK I G F E D C B A2 AHMNO
T.O. SPIRE
1052' -0"
10' - 0" 6' - 0" 30' - 10"30' - 0" 11' - 8" 20' - 6" 20' - 6" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 19' - 6" 19' - 6" 17' - 0"86' - 3 1/4"12' - 6 1/2"
10
'
-
0
"
6
'
-
0
"
1
7
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
1
2
'
-
0
"
DECORATIVE
FIBERGLASS PARAPET
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOF
HEAVY TIMBER COLUMNS
WOOD LOOK
METAL PANEL
SLATE CLADDING
ORNAMENTAL FIBERGLASS
ELEMENTS
ALUMINUM
STOREFRONT SYSTEM
METAL AWNING
STUCCO
SLATE CLADDING
STUCCO
GROUND FLOOR
1002' -0"
T.O. ROOF
1036' -0"
LOWER ROOF
1014' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
1042' -0"
LOWER PARAPET
1019' -0"
1234
T.O. SPIRE
1052' -0"
32' - 8"80' - 0"32' - 8"
10
'
-
0
"
6
'
-
0
"
1
7
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
1
2
'
-
0
"
ORNAMENTAL
FIBERGLASS
ELEMENTS
CONCRETE PANEL
MAIN ENTRY CANOPY
STUCCO
DECORATIVE
FIBERGLASS
PARAPET
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOF
SLATE RAIN-SCREEN CLADDING
WOOD LOOK METAL PANEL
HEAVY TIMBER COLUMNS
ALUMINUM STORE FRONT SYSTEM
ALUMINUM STORE FRONT SYSTEM
MATERIAL LEGEND
PRODUCT: WOOD LOOK METAL PANEL
COMPANY: LONGBOARD
PROFILE: 6" V GROOVE
COLOR: LIGHT NATIONAL WALNUT
PRODUCT: SLATE CLADDING
COMPANY: CUPACLAD
PROFILE: 101 LOGIC
COLOR: NATURAL SLATE
PRODUCT: STUCCO
COMPANY: DRYVIT
PROFILE: SANDPEBBLE FINE
COLOR: SW TRICORN BLACK
PRODUCT: ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
COMPANY: KAWNEER
PROFILE: 451 UT
COLOR: BLACK
PRODUCT: CONCRETE PANELS
COMPANY: RIEDER
PROFILE: 1/2" GFRC PANELS
COLOR: GREY SCALE
FACADE % BREAKDOWN
WOOD LOOK METAL PANEL 5.08%
SLATE CLADDING 17.28%
STUCCO 65.13%
GLASS 10.09%
TRANSLUCENT PANEL 1.22%
CONCRETE PANELS 1.19%
Project No:
F
E
D
C
B
12345678
DIPEN PATELARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER
3600 W 153rd St.
Leawood, KS 66224
p.816.686.2234
NOTE: Please refer to contractor/engineer for
any applicable building codes.
A
MISHA PATEL
3600 W 153rd St.
Leawood, KS 66224
p.816.686.2234
INTERIOR COORDINATOR
DATE ISSUED:
OCTOBER 12, 2022
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTOR
These plans are the property of the design team. Any
reproduction of these plans in whole or part or the
preparation of derivative works thereof without the
expressed written permission of the design team is
entirely prohibited.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
CIVIL ENGINEER
MEP ENGINEER
CODE & LIFE SAFETY
A 2.01
BAPS MINNEAPOLIS
MANDIR
Medina, MN
205010
SD PHASE
ELEVATIONS
1/16" = 1'-0"1WEST ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'-0"2NORTH ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'-0"3EAST ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'-0"4SOUTH ELEVATION
1
CITY OF MEDINA 1
PLANNING COMMISSION 2
DRAFT Meeting Minutes 3
Tuesday October 11, 2022 4
5
1. Call to Order: Chairperson Nielsen called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 6
7
Present: Planning Commissioners Ron Grajczyk, John Jacob, Beth Nielsen, Cindy Piper, 8
Justin Popp, and Braden Rhem. 9
10
Absent: None. 11
12
Also Present: City Planning Director Dusty Finke and City Planner Deb Dion 13
14
2. Changes to Agenda 15
16
No comments made. 17
18
3. Update from City Council Proceedings 19
20
Finke provided an update on recent City Council actions. 21
22
4. Representative at Next City Council Meeting 23
24
Finke advised that the Council will be meeting the following Tuesday and Grajczyk 25
volunteered to attend in representation of the Commission. 26
27
5. Planning Department Report 28
29
Finke provided an update. 30
31
6. Public Hearing – Cates Industrial Park – 2575 Cates Ranch Drive – 32
Oppidan – Concept Plan for Approximately 300,000 SF 33
Warehouse/Industrial Development (PID 0411823140004) 34
35
Finke stated that this proposal would be for approximately 300,000 square feet of primarily 36
warehouse space. He summarized the previous reviews and actions that resulted in 37
conditional approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment for the site. He noted that this 38
proposal is similar to concept three that was reviewed earlier this year and reviewed the 39
details of the updated concept including access, parking, stormwater ponds, 40
landscaping/screening, and architectural renderings. He noted that during the previous 41
discussions there was input related to truck traffic and a desire to push development away 42
from residential property and towards Willow Drive. He stated that the applicant attempted 43
to address some of those comments from the previous review in this updated concept. He 44
provided additional input related to setback requirements as well as additional ways to 45
encourage trucks to utilize Willow Drive rather than Chippewa. He also noted changes that 46
would be necessary related to the number of loading dock doors and traffic improvements 47
that would be required with the project. 48
49
Popp referenced the front yard setback and asked where that point is where 17 feet is 50
proposed rather than 20 feet. 51
2
52
Finke identified the area on the southern looped access. 53
54
Popp asked for clarification on the ten percent limit for the dock. 55
56
Finke stated that loading docks are limited to ten percent of the perimeter unless the docks are 57
screened by another structure, such as a courtyard. He noted the docks on the western 58
building are screened and therefore the limitation would not apply, but that limitation would 59
apply on the eastern building. 60
61
Nielsen asked if the eastern building would be screened by the wall. 62
63
Finke replied that is not a proposed wall, but berm and landscaping. 64
65
Jacob referenced the west side, facing Willow Drive, and asked for details from the parking 66
to the road. 67
68
Finke replied that 25 feet would be needed at minimum from the parking to the right-of-way. 69
70
Jacob asked if there would be potential to use berm or screening between the road and 71
buildings to the public road. 72
73
Finke replied that there are landscaping requirements but there are not buffer yard 74
requirements between two business properties. 75
76
Piper asked, and received confirmation, that 45 feet of building height is the maximum height 77
in the business district. 78
79
Jacob asked if that would provide an opportunity for a mezzanine level or second story in the 80
office area. 81
82
Jay Moore, Oppidan, stated that they have been working with the Cates family for over a year 83
on this project. He stated that they are attempting to gain input and determine if there is 84
support for this concept before moving forward into a more formal submission of plans. He 85
recognized the off-site improvements that will be made to improve traffic as part of this 86
project and highlighted the other changes that have been made to the concept in order to 87
address the previous comments of the Commission and Council. He stated that they have 88
attempted to minimize the wetland impacts to the extent possible. He stated that the Cates 89
family has also agreed to provide the City with an easement for a future lift station on their 90
northern property. He commented that the number of docks seems to be a little light for the 91
eastern building and asked if there would be any flexibility to request additional docks if that 92
is necessary. He noted that there is a berm and pond and there would be landscaping. 93
94
Nielsen asked if the applicant agrees with the conditions noted by staff. 95
96
Moore commented that he did have questions about the loading dock and also related to the 97
architectural requirements for the northern elevation. 98
99
Grajczyk asked if there are specific businesses that the applicant would target for these 100
buildings as a tenant. 101
102
Moore commented that they currently are not working with a tenant, but they do have a 103
meeting setup next month with a local business looking for a headquarters. He noted that 104
3
they have a similar project in Chaska that has a lot of interest. He stated that once a building 105
goes up, they receive a lot of interest. He expected several high-quality users having interest 106
in this project. 107
108
Piper asked when this would be anticipated to be occupied. 109
110
Moore replied most likely spring of 2024. 111
112
Nielsen opened the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. 113
114
Isai Damyan, 2240 Chippewa Road, stated that his main concern is with the proximity to his 115
home along with concerns for noise and traffic. 116
117
Finke stated that the applicant currently proposes a setback of 101 feet on that side, where the 118
minimum setback is 100 feet. 119
120
Damyan stated that he would also have concern with the building height. He stated that if 121
this does move forward, he would prefer to not see the structure close to his home. He asked 122
if there would be any fencing. 123
124
Jacob noted the condition related to buffering which could include berming, landscaping 125
and/or fencing. 126
127
Finke commented that perhaps the applicant could address the use of the eastern looped drive. 128
He stated that staff has suggested some things in attempt to minimize activity on the eastern 129
side. 130
131
Moore replied that is provided for the fire lane. 132
133
Jacob asked if that loop could go out to Cates Ranch Drive rather than Chippewa in order to 134
redirect that traffic towards Willow. 135
136
Moore stated that they would place appropriate signage throughout the development directing 137
truck traffic to Willow. He noted that the lane on the east is strictly for the fire lane. 138
139
R.J. and Jolene Burgess, 2490 Cates Ranch Drive, stated that he was concerned that his lack 140
of comments at earlier meeting may have been mistaken as his support. He stated that 141
placing the buildings back so far with docks facing Cates Ranch Drive is a concern for those 142
properties along Cates Ranch Drive. He stated that he would prefer something similar to 143
option one where the docks face each other and therefore the noise and lights would be 144
screened by the buildings. He asked if the buildings could be spun so that the docks do not 145
face Cates Ranch Drive. He stated that they are not opposed to the development but would 146
like some changes to be made so that they do not see so much of the traffic coming and 147
going. 148
149
Jolene Burgess commented that it will be tough for them to get in and out of their driveway 150
as proposed. She commented that the noise and scent from the loading docks will impact 151
their property. 152
153
Burgess commented that he is also concerned with the additional traffic on Willow Drive as 154
truck traffic already parks along side of Willow at times. He asked why the traffic could not 155
be directed to Chippewa rather than placing additional traffic onto Willow. 156
157
4
Finke stated that there was discussion during the past concept that included the northern 158
parcel which included use of Chippewa for employees. He highlighted some of the traffic 159
improvements that would be part of the project. He noted that there was not a stacking 160
concern for trucks to get onto Highway 55 from Willow and the real concern was with 161
employees during peak times. 162
163
Burgess asked the path that truck traffic would be taking to come into and leave the site. 164
165
Finke stated that staff suggested encouraging trucks to use Willow as much as possible which 166
could be done onsite for trucks leaving the site. He commented that there would not be 167
restrictions on inbound traffic. 168
169
Burgess commented that if the docks face each other, he would not see a reason trucks would 170
need to park alongside the road to wait as the courtyard would provide more room for 171
staging. 172
173
J. Burgess provided input on the difficulty to get onto Highway 55 at that location, noting that 174
it often takes a few light cycles. 175
176
Jacob asked if the City could request MnDOT to change the light cycle timing. 177
178
Finke replied that at this time that intersection is not monitored but stated that as part of this 179
project, the applicant would be providing a monitoring camera. He noted that MnDOT would 180
not find it unreasonable for a vehicle to wait a few cycles to get onto Highway 55, as MnDOT 181
prioritizes traffic on Highway 55. 182
183
Burgess stated that they do not have much challenge with the western building. He asked 184
why the eastern building could not be turned 90 degrees to the south and left justified to be 185
closer to Chippewa. He commented that they have ingress and egress rights onto Cates 186
Ranch Drive and asked if they would receive any information on the changes that would be 187
made to that roadway. 188
189
Finke noted that the same notice for this meeting would be provided for the formal 190
application. 191
192
J. Burgess stated that when they purchased this home they intended to be there forever. She 193
commented that the ingress/egress for their property may be blocked with truck traffic. She 194
asked if they could split off from that to have their own access. 195
196
Finke commented on a potential change that could be made to split that driveway off but 197
noted that would impact the site layout. He commented that the lots to the east do not have 198
frontage on a public street, therefore the dedication of that right-of-way is important, but the 199
location is not locked in where that could be provided. 200
201
Moore commented that he did not believe there would be trucks parking on the east side of 202
Willow for this site. He stated that the trailer court could house 50 trucks easily with 203
additional parking available. He commented that the existing buildings with truck traffic 204
were designed in the past and are thriving but perhaps not designed to support that. He stated 205
that this building would be office with employees and a warehouse with some distribution. 206
He stated that if needed, a truck could wait internally. He stated that from the previous 207
discussions it seems concept three was the preferred option of the Commission and Council 208
and therefore they moved forward with that design which is efficient and minimizes impacts 209
5
to wetland. He stated that while there is a potential to move the layout, it would impact the 210
environment. 211
212
Nielsen asked the hours the truck court would be used. 213
214
Moore replied that would typically be used during business hours. 215
216
Piper asked if trucks could arrive early and wait for business hours. 217
218
Moore replied that could potentially occur. 219
220
Popp referenced the screening wall and asked the approximate height. 221
222
Mike Brandt, project engineer, replied that would be a berm of approximately six feet with 223
landscaping on the top. 224
225
Popp noted that the berm would be six feet with trees to provide additional screening. 226
227
J. Burgess stated that she understands the comment related to wetland impacts. She noted 228
that a memory care center was just developed, and a pond was dug to mitigate the wetland 229
impacts. 230
231
Burgess commented that when the applicant’s team was speaking at the last meeting, the 232
Council picked the option they believed would best fit. He noted that he did not make a 233
comment because the applicant stated there was not yet a user. He stated that he did not want 234
to provide a lot of input without a user. He asked why the building could not be turned. 235
236
Nielsen stated that was addressed noting the desire to minimize wetland impacts. 237
238
Nielsen closed the public hearing at 7:59 p.m. 239
240
Jacob commented that he likes the overall concept of the building and warehouse/distribution 241
center. He stated that he does have input on berming and provided the location of a 242
distribution park in Plymouth which uses large berms to screen from an adjacent residential 243
development. 244
245
Grajczyk commented that perhaps public safety could follow up on the comment related to 246
trucks already parking along Willow to address that issue. He agreed that screening will be a 247
priority in order to create a buffer. He recognized that this is a challenging area because there 248
are some residential homes along with business development. He asked if Cates Ranch Drive 249
could be connected to the east to Mohawk, as that could create another potential route. He 250
stated that perhaps the size of the easterly building could be shrunk a bit to reduce the impact 251
on adjacent properties and maintain the more rural feel. He stated that color selection could 252
also help this fit into the area. 253
254
Rhem agreed with the previous comments noting that his biggest concern is related to the 255
berming and a desire to minimize the impacts to neighbors. 256
257
Nielsen stated that originally, she preferred concept three, but looking at the two-building 258
plan she had not thought about the beeping from the trucks. She noted that does concern her 259
and therefore she could love to rotate the building to have the truck bays face each other. She 260
stated that perhaps the south road at the end of the west building could be removed to force 261
the traffic towards the north onto Willow. 262
6
263
Piper commented that she also likes the idea of rotating the buildings given the concerns that 264
were brought forward. She stated that if that is not possible, she would recommend 265
shortening the east building by 20 feet. 266
267
Finke stated that if the docks were orientated towards each other, more docks would be 268
allowed as the ten percent limitation would then not apply. 269
270
Popp commented that he likes that the wetland impacts have been mitigated and greatly 271
reduced from the original concept. He referenced the comment about rotating the buildings, 272
noting that would be much more supported. He applauded the applicant for their wetland 273
mitigation impacts. 274
275
7. Public Hearing – Scannell Properties/Loram – Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review 276
for Subdivision of Three Lots and Development of Approximately 396,000 SF of 277
Warehouse/Office/Industrial – East of Arrowhead Drive, South of Highway 55 (PIDs 278
1111823220003 and 1111823230001) 279
280
Finke stated that supplemental information has been provided since the last review of the 281
Commission related to reduced wetland impacts, wetland buffer averaging, and landscaping. 282
He stated that the related plans have not yet been updated as they wanted to gain input from 283
the Commission and Council prior to updating those related plans. He stated that additional 284
land was added into the site to reduce the hardcover percentage. He reviewed the additional 285
landscaping that has been provided along with the additional architectural materials and 286
details that were added. He stated that even though the wetland impacts were reduced, there 287
would still be 1.22 acres of impact. He noted again that with the additional land that was 288
added, the applicant was able to get under the hardcover threshold. He stated that 289
information has been provided by the applicant on their projection for the parking need. He 290
stated that this would appear to meet the minimum parking requirements, but staff has 291
concerns with a lack of space for proof of parking, should that become an issue. He noted 292
that the applicant stated that if there was a use that needed additional parking, it would most 293
likely not need the same space for loading docks and that could then be converted to parking. 294
He stated that staff suggests memorialization of the uses as proposed in order to ensure there 295
would continue to be sufficient parking. 296
297
Popp referenced the wetland to west next to Arrowhead, identified as wetland eight, and 298
asked how much of that wetland would be impacted. 299
300
A representative for the applicant replied that impact was noted as about 20,000 square feet, 301
which is about half of that wetland. 302
303
Jacob asked if there is aquatic life or vegetation that would be an area of concern. 304
305
Finke replied that a function and values assessment of the wetlands was done, and the 306
western wetland was identified as a manage three, which is on the lower end, whereas the 307
eastern wetland was higher but did not believe it housed any noted species. 308
309
Jacob commented that most of the wetlands are dry today. 310
311
Phil Homan, CEO of Loram, stated that he is also a citizen of Medina. He referenced the 312
feedback that was received in the prior review and noted that they made changes to the plan 313
to address those concerns. He stated that they have also had a few meetings with the TEP 314
related to the wetlands. He stated that he has worked at Loram for almost 30 years and the 315
7
company has been a good corporate citizen of Medina since the late 1960s. He stated that the 316
subject property was acquired in the 1980s for strategic growth opportunities in the future. 317
He stated that the land was rented to farmers in the past and a portion was sold to the 318
MotorPlex development. He stated that in the last 50 years they have completed four 319
additions to the existing building and ran out of room on that parcel for additional expansion. 320
He stated that they currently lease space in several warehouse facilities in the metro area and 321
this expansion would allow Loram to consolidate those leased spaces onto this parcel. He 322
stated that while Loram has locations across the world and in the U.S., they consider Medina 323
to be home. He stated that his office window stares out at what would be the northern portion 324
of this proposed development. He stated that he also owns a unit in the MotorPlex, therefore 325
he will see the development from all sides. He stated that as a citizen of Medina he would 326
not promote a project that he does not believe will be a good fit for Medina. He noted that 327
the principal of Scannell also happens to be a Medina resident, therefore there are two 328
partners in the project that have a vested interest in Medina. He stated that they have held 329
this land for some time and now have a need to use it. He stated that this also provides an 330
opportunity to capitalize on the interest in this area of the metro and provide space for another 331
user. He stated that they would have liked to move forward earlier but the construction 332
season has passed and therefore they would like to move forward with construction in the 333
spring. 334
335
Piper asked if Loram would be using buildings one and two with future development by 336
others. 337
338
Homan commented that Loram would fully occupy building two which would be primarily 339
warehouse needs. He stated that building one would be constructed at the same time and they 340
would intend to attract likeminded vendors of theirs, as that would lead to more efficient 341
operations. 342
343
Piper referenced the future development by others area and asked if the ownership of that 344
property would remain the same. 345
346
Homan stated that Loram would completely own lot two but would share ownership with 347
Scannell of the other two lots. He stated that buildings one and two would be constructed at 348
the same time and building three would be constructed in the future based on market demand. 349
350
Piper asked who the City would deal with when there are plans for that property. 351
352
Homan stated that the development will be as proposed but building three would be more 353
dependent on the tenant that comes forward similar to the Oppidan request prior to this case. 354
He confirmed that all buildings would look and feel the same to match the campus. 355
356
Finke replied that the plat would be laid out with the separate lot and the site plan review 357
would include all three buildings. He stated that if the third building came forward in the 358
next four years, it could proceed to permit as presented in these plans. 359
360
Ashley Pane, wetland professional at Kimley-Horn, stated that they have reviewed multiple 361
concepts for this site before deciding on the site plan as proposed. She noted that they began 362
with delineation in summer of 2021 and provided details on the wetlands on the site. She 363
stated that they provided a full wetland avoidance concept which had one building that would 364
not impact wetlands but noted that does not meet the needs of the applicant. She also 365
reviewed the two-building scenario which would also not meet the needs of the applicant and 366
would still have wetland impacts with the docks visible from Arrowhead. She stated that this 367
project included an EAW, and a negative declaration was issued by the City Council earlier 368
8
this year which included a concept with larger buildings and 2.3 acres of wetland impacts. 369
She stated that the comments from the concept from the City and other agencies included a 370
desire for a reduced size and wetland impact. She reviewed the different concepts that were 371
reviewed after that time that included three buildings and attempted to reduce the scale and 372
impacts to wetlands. She stated that their proposal would avoid the highest quality portion of 373
the wetland and they would also propose to create additional wetland along Arrowhead to 374
replace some of what would be lost. She noted that about the same area of wetland would be 375
provided along Arrowhead. She stated that the applicant would also purchase bank credits at 376
a 2:1 ratio to mitigate the loss of the remainder of the wetlands that would be impacted. She 377
noted that the applicant would not request credit for the additional wetland created along 378
Arrowhead Drive, that would simply be done in addition. 379
380
Brian Wurdeman, Kimley-Horn, stated that they have added bike parking for each of the 381
buildings, enhanced pedestrian connectivity between each of the buildings, added EV ready 382
parking areas, and adding additional landscaping along Arrowhead Drive. 383
384
Scott Moe, Scannell Properties, stated that Loram needs to expand, and the other two 385
buildings would be a joint investment between Loram and Scannell. He stated that the 386
building closest to Arrowhead would attract a higher finish user and provided examples. He 387
stated that smaller tenants would be attracted to the first building and believed that could be a 388
combination of Loram vendors/suppliers and others. He stated that the building fronting 389
Arrowhead would completely screen the courtyard for trucks. He stated that this project 390
would benefit Loram and the other businesses, increase the tax base, bring in employment 391
options, and improve the aesthetic along Arrowhead Drive. He commented that the wetland 392
authorities have done a great job on this proposal, and he acknowledged the importance of 393
wetlands. He stated that the wetland entity has limitations on how flexible they can be as 394
they view a wetland as a wetland, whereas most of these wetlands are dry and farmed. He 395
noted that they would be replacing these low-quality wetlands with higher quality wetlands of 396
a ratio of 2:1, along with increasing the wetland value near Arrowhead. 397
398
Nielsen opened the public hearing at 8:57 p.m. 399
400
Phil Holman, 150 Sunrise Court, stated that this property is bordered by Loram, the 401
MotorPlex, a swamp, land purchased by the School District, and additional land with a 402
purpose to be determined. He noted that this is an opportunity for Loram to pick its 403
neighbors and stated that not one residential property would be impacted. He stated that he 404
could not think of a more perfect spot in Medina to place this type of development. He stated 405
that he has also had a meeting with the religious institution that is being constructed in this 406
area in attempt to be a good neighbor and that organization had no issues. He stated that they 407
also had a similar conversation with the MotorPlex that also did not have any concerns. He 408
commented that there are businesses in Hamel that are outgrowing their space, and this could 409
be an option for those businesses to locally relocate which would free up space in Hamel as 410
well. 411
412
Piper asked what will be done with the property at the corner of Arrowhead and Hamel. 413
414
Homan replied that Mayor Martin and Finke met with him recently. He stated that their 415
intention would be to move the activity from that site to building one which would orphan 416
that piece of property for them. He stated that would leave the property available for 417
redevelopment or sale. He stated that their vision for that five acres would be to have it 418
redeveloped into something more appropriate. 419
420
Nielsen closed the public hearing at 9:00 p.m. 421
9
422
Popp stated that in reviewing the report there was one thing that jumped out, the statement 423
from the TEP that the applicant has not taken sufficient effort to avoid wetland impacts. He 424
referenced a two-building concept that was included in the review from the applicant tonight 425
that would have less wetland impact. He stated that Loram is a successful business in the 426
community, and he wants to support this project but also wants to understand why the two-427
building option would not be feasible as there is similar square footage between the two 428
building and three building concepts and similar distances between the buildings. He stated 429
that the wetland creation sounds wonderful and seems to offset a large amount of the wetland 430
impacts. He stated that if the 2:1 mitigation credits would be purchased and additional 431
wetland would be created, he would be more supportive of the request. 432
433
Rhem commented that if the screening were not provided by building one, the City would 434
request additional screening. 435
436
Finke stated that the wetland itself is subject to Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) rules and 437
there is a minimum buffer required adjacent to the wetlands. He stated that part of the 438
mitigation area would be protected greenspace which would be similar to the created 439
wetlands. 440
441
Piper commented that she supports the request and did not see a reason to deny the request. 442
443
Rhem commended the development team for answering the questions he had during the last 444
review related to the wetlands, mitigation and steps that have been taken in attempt to avoid 445
those impacts. He stated that he now feels that he has a better understanding and supports the 446
request. 447
448
Grajczyk also commended Kimley-Horn for the presentation and review that has been 449
completed for this process. He stated that he also supports Loram and the desired expansion. 450
He commented that these are farmed and low-quality wetlands and because all options have 451
been reviewed, he can support this plan. 452
453
Jacob agreed that he likes the plan and wished the applicant well. 454
455
Nielsen stated that she disagrees with the comments of the Commission. She appreciated all 456
that has gone into the design and attempt to address the feedback from the last review. She 457
did not see a need for lot three as there is not a need for that at this time. She noted that she 458
also does not see a need for building one, although there are ideas for that use. She stated that 459
she would prefer the two-building concept. She acknowledged that a wetland is a wetland 460
and did not want this request to set precedent and therefore will not support this request. 461
462
Wurdeman stated that Hennepin County has reviewed this and wants the majority of the 463
traffic to come from the north, therefore the length of the building in the two-building 464
concept would limit the ability for access, to get parked vehicles along the frontage, and 465
would impact traffic flow. He stated that the truck movements would also be difficult to get 466
around that building. 467
468
Finke commented that with roadway extensions the southern access point would be in play, 469
even though Hennepin County prefers the northern access. 470
471
Homan stated that they are going to be moving equipment and material between the existing 472
building and the new building. He noted that the ownership of the new buildings will also be 473
different and therefore combining uses would make that difficult. He explained that moving 474
10
equipment and material between facilities that goes through traffic, parking and pedestrian 475
areas would also not be safe. He stated that in the discussions with the TEP there was an 476
agreed need for 380,000 square feet but the TEP did not agree that there was a need for 477
396,000 square feet and therefore there seems to be incongruity in how the need is 478
established. He stated that they will be investing $40,000,000 into this project and he would 479
not be doing that if there was not a need. He stated that the TEP agreed to impacts of .76 480
acres of wetlands but not with 1.22 acres. He stated that they are creating three acres of 481
wetlands that do not exist today with their mitigation credits. He stated that the TEP provided 482
their preference without expressing that in a meeting with them. He noted that the preferred 483
option of the TEP does not meet the County requirement, nor does it meet his needs as the 484
business. He stated that their proposed request is roughly the same as the preferred option of 485
the TEP. 486
487
Finke stated that offsite mitigation always requires 2:1 replacement. 488
489
Motion by Rhem, seconded by Jacob, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and 490
site plan review subject to the conditions within the staff report. Motion carries 4 – 2 (Popp 491
and Nielsen opposed). 492
493
8. Approval of the September 13, 2022 Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. 494
495 Motion by Piper, seconded by Rhem, to approve the September 13, 2022, Planning 496
Commission minutes with noted changes. Motion carries unanimously. 497
498
9. Adjourn 499
500
Motion by Rhem, seconded by Piper, to adjourn the meeting at 9:20 p.m. Motion carried 501
unanimously. 502