HomeMy Public PortalAbout12) 8A Conformance with Congestion Management ProgramDATE:
TO:
FROM:
AGENDA
ITEM 8.A.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
August 16, 2016
The Honorable City Council
Brian Cook, City Manager
Via : Michael D. Forbes, AICP , Community Development Director~
By: Adam L. Gulick, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 16-5194 CERTIFYING
CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FOR JUNE 1, 2015 TO MAY 31 , 2016
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council is requested to hold a public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 16-5194
certifying conformance with the Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program.
BACKGROUND:
1. In 1990, Proposition 111 was passed in California requiring all cities and counties
to adopt measures to reduce traffic congestion in their region.
2. In 1992, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA)
implemented a Congestion Management Program (CMP). In accordance with this
program, every city must make an annual determination of conformance.
3. On October 28, 2010, the LACMTA adopted their latest CMP.
4. On August 1, 2016, a public hearing notice was published in the Temple City
Tribune.
ANALYSIS:
The passage of Proposition 111 in 1990 provided an increase in the State Gas Tax to
fund regional transportation improvements (Streets and Highways Code, Section 21 05)
and created the CMP to monitor regional transportation cond itions. The state
legislature required the LACMTA to establis h a CMP, which would annually monitor
local jurisdictions to determine if they were in compliance with the CMP. Conformance
City Council
August 16, 2016
Page 2 of 2
with the CMP assures that local agencies are providing transportation improvements to
offset the traffic congestion resulting from new development.
The CMP requires that certain provisions be included in the City's Zoning Code to
address traffic congestion associated with new development. The CMP also requires
monitoring of pre-designated traffic corridors every odd-numbered year. In Temple City,
the only CMP designated route is Rosemead Boulevard. The required monitoring will
be conducted next year and the results will be submitted to LACMT A. Cities are also
required to submit a yearly Local Development Report (LOR) to LACMTA to assist them
with planning regional transportation projects.
The City is in full conformance with the CMP in that all of the development review
requirements have been codified into the Zoning Code and all monitoring has been
completed. Adopting Resolution No . 16-5194 (Attachment "A") adopts the 2016 LOR
(Attachment "B") and certifies the City's conformance with the CMP. If a city does not
conform to the CMP, that city's share of the Gas Tax increase provided by Proposition
111 may be withheld and allocated to the County to be used on regional transportation
projects. Temple City's Fiscal Year 2016-2017 share is estimated at $766,000.
CITY STRATEGIC GOALS:
Approval of Resolution furthers the City's Strategic Goals of Good Governance, Public
Health and Safety, and Quality of Life.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Conformance with the Congestion Management Program will allow the City to receive
the State Gas Tax funds pursuant to Proposition 111 , which is estimated to amount to
approximately $766,000 for the Fiscal Year 2016-2017.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution No. 16-5194
B. 2016 Local Development Report
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 16-5194
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE
CITY, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE
WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND
ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
65089
WHEREAS, CMP Statute requires the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
("LACMTA"), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, to annually determine
that the County and Cities with in the County are conforming to all CMP requirements; and
WHEREAS, LACMTA requires submittal of the CMP Local Development Report by September 1st of
each year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on August 16, 2016.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City of Temple City adopts the Local Development Report, attached hereto and
made a part hereof, consistent with all applicable requirements of the 2010 CMP adopted by the LACMTA
Board on October 28, 2010.
1. By June 15, of odd-numbered years, the City of Temple City has and will continue to
conduct annual traffic counts and calculated levels of service for selected arterial
intersections, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Hig hway and
Roadway System chapter.
2. The City of Temple City has locally adopted and continues to implement a transportation
demand management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in
the CMP Transportation Demand Management chapter.
3. The City of Temple City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use
analysis program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land
Use Analysis Program chapter.
4. The City has adopted a Local Development Report, attached hereto and made a part
hereof, consistent with the requirements identified in the 2010 CMP. This report balances
traffic congestion impacts due to growth within the City of Temple City with transportation
improvements, and demonstrates that the City of Temple City is meeting its
responsibilities under the Countywide Deficiency Plan consistent with the LACMT A Board
adopted 2014 Short Range Transportation Plan.
SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward a
copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The City Clerk shall
enter this Resolution into the book of original resolutions.
Resolution No. 16-5194
Page 2
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 16th day of August, 2016.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
MAYOR
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution, Resolution No. 16-5194, was duly passed, approved
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple City at a regular meeting held on the 16th day of
August, 2015 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
City Clerk
Councilmember-
Councilmember-
Councilmember-
Councilmember-
I
ATTACHMENT 8
City of Temple City Date Prepared: July 28, 2016
2016 CMP Local Development Report
Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2015-MAY 31 , 2016
Contact: Michael Forbes
Phone Number: (626) 285-2171
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY
2016 DEFICIENCY PLAN SUMMARY
• IMPORTANT: All "#value!" cells on this page are automatically calculat ed.
Please do not enter data in these cells.
DEVELOPMENT TOTALS
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Group Quarters
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Commercial (less than 300,000 sq. ft.)
Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more)
Freestanding Eating & Drinking
NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Lodging
Industrial
Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.)
Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.)
Office (300,000 sq . ft. or more)
Medical
Government
Institutional/Educational
University (# of students)
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
ENTER IF APPLICABLE
ENTER IF APPLICABLE
EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT TOTALS
Exempted Dwelling Units
Exempted Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s)
Dwelling Units
(27.00)
56.00
0.00
1,000 Net Sq.Ft.2
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,000 Net Sq.Ft.2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Daily Trips
0.00
0.00
1
0
2. Net square feet is the difference between new development and adjustments entered on pages 2 and 3.
Page 1
City of Temple City
2016 CMP Local Development Report
Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2015-MAY 31 ,2016
Date Prepared: July 28, 2016
Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0."
PART 1: NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category Dwelling
Units
Single Family Residential 46.00
Multi-Family Residential 56.00
Group Quarters 0.00
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1,000 Gross
Square Feet
Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 0.00
Commercial (300,000 sq. ft. or more) 0.00
Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00
NON-RET AIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1,000 Gross
Square Feet
Lodging 0.00
Industrial 0.00
Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00
Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00
Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00
Medical 0.00
Government 0.00
I nstitutionai/Ed ucational 0.00
University (# of students) 0.00
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Description Daily Trips
(Attach additional sheets if necessary) !(Enter "0" if none
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00
Page 2
City of Temple City
2016 CMP Local Development Report
Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2015-MAY 31, 2016
Date Prepared: July 28, 2016
Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0."
PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) development permits that were both
issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any
structure with the reporting period.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category Dwelling
Units
Single Family Residential 73.00
Multi-Family Residential 0.00
Group Quarters 0.00
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1,000 Gross
Square Feet
Commercial (less than 300,000 sq. ft.) 0.00
Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00
Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00
NON-RET AIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1,000 Gross
Square Feet
Lodging 0.00
Industrial 0.00
Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00
Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00
Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00
Medical 0.00
Government 0.00
In stitutionai/Ed ucational 0.00
University (#of students) 0.00
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Description Daily Trips
(Attach additional sheets if necessary) !(Enter "0" if none)
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00
Page 3
City of Temple City Date Prepared: July 28, 2016
2016 CMP Local Development Report
Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2015-MAY 31 ,2016
Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0."
PART 3: EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
(NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS)
LowNery Low Income Housing 11 Dwelling Units
High Density Residential ol Dwelling Units
Near Rail Stations
Mixed Use Developments ~I 1,000 Gross Square Feet
Near Rail Stations Dwelling Units
Development Agreem ents Entered ~I 1,000 Gross Square Feet
into Prior to July 10, 1989 Dwelling Units
Reconstruction of Buildings ~I 1,000 Gross Square Feet
Damaged due to "calamity'' Dwelling Units
Reconstruction of Buildings ~I 1,000 Gross Square Feet
Damaged in Jan. 1994 Earthquake Dwelling Units
Total Dwelling Units 1
Total Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s) 0
ExemQted DeveloQment Definitions:
1. LowNery Low Income Housing: As defined by the California Department of Housing and Community
Development as follows:
-Low-Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size.
Page4
-Very Low-Income: equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size.
2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: Development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger
station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under
the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre
is automatically considered high density.
3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: Mixed-use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger
station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high
density residential housing.
4. Development Agreements: Projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under Section
65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989.
5. Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non-residential structure which is damaged or destroyed,
to the extent of> or= to 50% of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake or other similar calamity.
6. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning regulations and
where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval/disapproval authority. These locally
precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LOR.