The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About2003-22RESOLUTION NO. 2003 - 22 A RESOLUTION AFFHOIING WAL -MART EAST, INC. OF COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENTS OF BENEFITS WHEREAS, Wal -Mart East, Inc., has heretofore been granted certain tax abatements in consideration of certain benefits for the City of Greencastle; and, WHEREAS, said company has submitted a from CF -1 as of XXX, 2003 for tax abatement granted in 1994; and WHEREAS, the Greencastle Common Council has reviewed the CF -1 form, a copy of which is attached hereto, and has found compliance with the Statements of Benefits as approved by the Greencastle Common Council; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Common Council of the City of Greencastle, Putnam County, Indiana, approves the CF -1 form as submitted as being in compliance with the Statements of Benefits previously filed by Wal -Mart East, Inc. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution of the Greencastle Common Council be made a record and filed along with the CF -1 form with the Putnam County Auditor. PASSED by the Common Council of the Cityof Greencastle at its regular meeting this 13th day of May, 2003. COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENCASTLE, Mark N. Hammer a M. Leichty Thomas W. Roach ' e Rokicki Robert Sedlack Approved and signed by me this 13th day of May, 2003 o p.m. o'clock. Nancy A hael, Mayor ST: Pamela S. Jones, Cler -T a surer 05/07/03 16:00 _ $765 653 6385 PARTNERSHIP CTR. COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENT OF BENEFITS Stare Fonn 4+973 (RS 1 12-01) Preepibod by the Depenme d of Local Goemmetd Flnsam INSTRUCTIONS: f. Pmpedy owners whose Statement of Benefits was approved kcal Deslgnafing Body to show the extent to which them he, fo progeny JDmted N e re.Wdmt1affy. datmasdawI (Cal. 2. if fhe deduction apples to Reel Estate and Impro vements th annually wAin slx4' (60f d alter the slid of each )earl x 1 For New MenWaoturM9 Equrrlsrd orNwv Research and Day orR and OE rwpsadvety bahyean Mardi 1 ald ifey 16 of ea person who obtains a filing extension most file b 4. 16 th the approval of the daskmarbm body minrJraan. r..n.T PA 003 FORM CF -1 Juror 30, 1991 mush file Ifs /ohm with ma CountyAuditorand Me oomp(fence wfth the Statement of Benefits. (Thk does not apply 1.66) e tors must be Rod with the initial deduction appUcatlon and then We deducilorr is eppilcabk. am Equipment this km must be Rod with Form 322 ERAIPP, ME, r, unheas a Nhrg extenslon under IC 6- 1.1.17 hat been granted. A m March i and the ext+nded due date of each year, tOT RWNP Plolapts maybe cronsolidekd on one (1) compliance 13 Ste- l0� �r ►�5 d55s '?2r(CCo �t � Name of contact person LOCATION AND DESCRIVTI O F f'r jme of dasignatyg body Resolution number Localfon of properly (k_ . C ° ro m P ' Taxing district Pme lu feel �uOI 911 1 31 ` 0 4 4 01 "111111 e"dtor how menldachrdng a Wlpmant gnew ressaaa and d"opment E3limated Starting data �O J 6.y� Estima pompi -don date SECTIONS - -;: -.: EMPLOYEES AND SALARIES ::.,..< ps Estimated on SB +Estimated nn 5 &1 r Actual`- aaaaaj Date signed (ma. day, N.) SECTIONS WASTE CONVERTED AND OTHER BENEFITS PROMISED BY THE TA XPAYER ps Estimated on SB Actual - - 11 Date signed (ma. day, N.) SECTION fi TAXPAYER CERTIFICATION I that the reMstintations In thle sts tamentars We. S ofau�odrad raptesentalive Tlde rJ..i . ` a te Date signed (ma. day, N.) V�f INSTRUCTIONS. QC6 -1.1- 121 7 5.9) 1. Within fortyfive (45) days after receipt of this form, the designating body may determine whether or not the properly owner has substantially complied with the Statement of Benefits. - 2 2. if the property ownerls found NOT to be insubstantial compliance, the designating body shall send the property owner written notice. The notice must include the reasons for the determination and the date, time and place of a hearing to be conducted by the designating body. If a notice is mailed to a property owner for new manufacturing equipment and I or research and development equipment, a copy of the written notice shall be sent to the State Board of Tax Commissioners. 3. Based onto information presented at the hearing, the designating body shall determine whether or not the property owner has made reasonable effort to substantially comply with the Statement of Benefits. 4. If the designating body determines that the property owner has NOT made reasonable effort to comply, than the designating body shall adopt a resolution terminating the deduction. The designating body shall immediately me# a centified copy of the resolution to. (1) the property owner, (2) the County Auditor, and (3) the State Board of Tax Commissioners. We have reviewed the CF -1 and find that ® the property owner IS in substantial compliance - ❑ the property owner IS NOT In substantial compliance - ❑ other (specify) Dale signed (month, day, year) Reasons for the determination (attach additional sheets if necessary) Signature o authorized me r - - - Date signed (month, day, yoar) a anc A. Michael M r M ay 13, 2003 hff ft'L st ;by: Designating' body _ amela S. Jones lerk= Treasurer Greencastle City Coun the property own r' fcond not to be in substantial compliance, the property owner shall receive the opportunity for a hearing. The following date and fimdhbs been set aside for the purpose of considering compliance. Time of hearing Date of hearing Location of hearing ❑ AM ❑ PM HEARING RESULTS (to be completed after the hearin ❑ Approved ❑ Denied (see instruction 4 above) Reasons for the determination (attach additional sheets if necessary) Signature of authorized member Dale signed (month, day, year) Attested by: Designating body APPEAL RIGHTS VC A property owner whose deduction is denied by the designating body may appeal the designating body's decision by filing a complaint in the office of the Circuit or Superior Court together with a bond conditioned to pay the costs of the appeal if the appeal is determined against the property owner. it