HomeMy Public PortalAbout12.06.2022 City Council Meeting Packet Posted 12/02/2022 Page 1 of 2
AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, December 6, 2022
7:00 P.M.
Medina City Hall
2052 County Road 24
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. MOTION TO DELEGATE DUTIES TO PRESIDE OVER THE
MEETING TO COUNCIL MEMBER ALBERS
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
IV. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Minutes of the November 15, 2022, Work Session Meeting
B. Minutes of the November 15, 2022, Regular City Council Meeting
VI. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approve 2023 Meeting Calendar
B. Resolution Establishing Polling Places for 2023
C. Approve 2023 Tobacco Licenses
D. Resolution Accepting the Resignation of Planning and Building Assistant Brenda Ruth and Approve
Recruitment of Planning and Permit Technician Position with Updated Job Description
E. Resolution Accepting Public Street Improvements within the Holy Name Lake Estates Subdivision
F. Resolution Ordering Preparation of a Feasibility Report on the Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation
Project
G. Loram Scannell Wetland Replacement Plan
VII. COMMENTS
A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda
B. Park Commission
C. Planning Commission
VIII. PRESENTATION
A. Resolution Recognizing Loretto Fire Chief Leuer
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. 2023 Budget
1. Budget and Tax Levy Presentation – Public Comment
2. Resolution Approving 2023 Final Tax Levy
3. Resolution Approving 2023 Final Budget
B. Ordinance Adopting an Amended Fee Schedule – Public Hearing
1. Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance by Title and Summary
C. Medina Venture - Medina Park and Boardwalk – 1472 Hwy 55 – PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat
D. Conduit Bond St. Therese of Corcoran – Public Hearing
1. Resolution Authorizing Issuance, Sale, and Delivery of Conduit Revenue Obligations
E. BAPS Minneapolis LLC – 1400 Hamel Road – Amended Site Plan Review
1. Resolution granting amended site plan review approval to BAPS Minneapolis LLC
F. Authorize Recruitment for Accounting Technician Position
Meeting Rules of Conduct to Address
the City Council:
• Fill out & turn in comment card
• Give name and address
• Indicate if representing a group
• Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes
Mayor Kathleen Martin will
participate in the meeting virtually
from Sonoma Valley Regional
Library located at 755 W Napa Street,
Sonoma CA, 95476.
Posted 12/02/2022 Page 2 of 2
Posted 09/30/2022 Page 2 of 2
G. Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 7 of the Code of Ordinances Regarding Public and Private
Utilities
1. Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance by Title and Summary
X. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT
XI. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
XII. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS
XIII. ADJOURN
MEMORANDUM
TO: Medina Mayor and City Council
FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator
DATE OF REPORT: December 1, 2022
DATE OF MEETING: December 6, 2022
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report
VI. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approve 2023 Meeting Calendar – Staff has put together the meeting calendar for the
City of Medina for 2023. Staff recommends approval.
See attached meeting calendar.
B. Approve Resolution Establishing Polling Places for 2023 – Minnesota Statutes 204B.16,
subd.1 requires the City Council, by ordinance or resolution, to designate polling places
by December 31 of each year for the upcoming year. Staff recommends approval.
See attached resolution.
C. Approve 2023 Tobacco Licenses – Staff recommends Council Approval of the 2023
tobacco license renewals.
See attached memo.
D. Approve Resolution Accepting the Resignation of Planning and Building Assistant
Brenda Ruth and Approve Recruitment of Planning and Permit Technician Position with
Updated Job Description – Planning and Building Assistant Brenda Ruth has resigned
from her position. Her last day was December 2, 2022. Staff recommends accepting her
resignation and requests authorization to begin the recruitment process to fill the vacant
Planning and Permit Technician position with an updated job description.
See attached resolution and job description.
E. Resolution Accepting Public Street Improvements within the Holy Name Lake Estates
Subdivision – Staff recommends accepting public utilities within the Holy Name Lake
Estates Subdivision.
See attached resolution.
2
F. Resolution Ordering Preparation of a Feasibility Report on the Clydesdale Trail
Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Staff recommends ordering the preparation of a
feasibility report from WSB for the proposed 2023 Clydesdale Trail road project.
See attached memo and resolution.
G. Loram Scannell Wetland Replacement Plan – Loram proposes to develop approximately
25 acres of land into an industrial park. The proposed development would include
construction of three buildings totaling approximately 400,000 square feet and associated
driveways, parking areas, and stormwater management areas. The project will result in
1.22 acres of permanent impact to 7 wetlands. The applicant will mitigate for the impacts
at a 2:1 ratio through purchase of 2.44 acres of wetland from Bank No. 1762, located in
Anoka County. Staff recommends approval.
See attached memo and letter of decision.
VIII. PRESENTATION
A. Resolution Recognizing Loretto Fire Chief Jeff Leuer For Being Named Fire Officer of the
Year – Loretto Fire Chief Jeff Leuer was presented the Fire Officer of the Year Award on
October 21, 2022 by the Minnesota State Fire Chiefs Association. The City of Medina
acknowledges and thanks Chief Jeff Leuer for his years of service to Medina and
recognizes him for the outstanding honor of receiving this award. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. 2023 Budget - Staff recommends a City General Fund Budget of $6,570,044 and a proposed
total levy of $6,000,946 for 2023. This is consistent with the preliminary budget adopted on
September 6, 2022 by the City Council. Staff recommends approval of the 2023 Budget.
Recommended Motions:
1. Adopt Resolution Approving the 2023 Final Tax Levy
2. Adopt Resolution Approving the 2023 Final Budget
B. Ordinance Adopting an Amended Fee Schedule – Public Hearing – Staff has updated the
attached fee schedule to reflect changes for 2023. This item has been noticed and a public
hearing will be held at this meeting prior to Council action on the ordinance.
Recommended Motions:
1. Adopt ordinance adopting an amended fee schedule for 2023.
2. Adopt resolution authorizing publication of ordinance by title and summary.
3
C. Medina Venture - Medina Park and Boardwalk – 1472 Hwy 55 - PUD General Plan and
Preliminary Plat – Medina Ventures is requesting approval of a PUD General Plan and
preliminary plat for a development including commercial uses and four townhome units
located along Meander Road east of Arrowhead Drive, west of Fields of Medina West. The
City provided comments on a PUD Concept Plan earlier this year. The subject site is over
18 acres in size, but the majority of the property is within the large wetland located west and
north of the site. The property north of Meander is vacant and contains approximately 1.0
net acre, and the property south of Meander Road is approximately 4.9 net acres and
includes a barn structure and a grove of trees around the building. Following review,
Council could consider tabling the application to allow the applicant to update plans to
incorporate lodging rooms into a proposed commercial building.
Potential Motion: Move to table the application to allow applicant to update plans to
incorporate lodging rooms into a proposed commercial building.
D. Conduit Bond St. Therese of Corcoran – Public Hearing – Staff was recently notified by
Kennedy & Graven about the opportunity to provide conduit bonding in 2022 for the St.
Therese senior housing project in Corcoran. Staff is bringing this opportunity forward for
Council review, discussion, and possible action. A resolution has been included authorizing
action if the City Council wishes to provide conduit bonding for the project.
Recommended Motion: Adopt resolution authorizing the issuance, sale, and delivery of
conduit revenue obligations
E. BAPS Minneapolis LLC – 1400 Hamel Road – Amended Site Plan Review – On November
16, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-78, granting Site Plan Review approval
for construction of a 46,000 s.f. religious/assembly use at 1400 Hamel Road. During review
of the Site Plan Review, the City enacted a moratorium and studied regulations related to
rooftop architectural elements. The applicant had originally requested rooftop elements on
their proposed structures, but updated their plans to remove the elements to abide by the
interim regulations within the moratorium. The applicant had intended to redesign the
elements based on the regulations ultimately adopted by the City. On March 1, 2022, the
City adopted updated regulations related to rooftop elements and rescinded the moratorium.
The applicant has now updated their architectural plans consistent with the updated
regulations. The applicant also proposes minor adjustments to the building footprint and
parking lot layout. Staff is requesting Council review of the amended site plan from the
applicant.
Potential Motion: Adopt the resolution granting amended site plan review approval to
BAPS Minneapolis LLC
F. Authorize Recruitment for Accounting Technician Position – The Finance Department is
requesting to move forward with advertising and recruitment to fill the full-time Accounting
4
Technician position to start in 2023. This position is approved as part of the preliminary
2023 budget. The job description is included. This position is a pay grade 3 with starting
hourly wage of $26.82-$30.81/hour depending on qualifications.
Recommended Motion: Authorize staff to being recruitment for the accounting technician
position for hire in 2023.
G. Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 7 of the Code of Ordinances Regarding Public
and Private Utilities – Staff is recommending an update to Section 710.71 Access to
Buildings. The ordinance update is to mitigate issues staff has encountered with meter
replacements. The proposed change is on page 21 of the attached ordinance.
Recommended Motions:
1. Adopt ordinance amending sections of Chapter 7 of the Code of Ordinances regarding
public and private utilities
2. Adopt resolution authorizing publication of ordinance by title and summary
XII. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS
Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 006610E-006629E for
$67,341.25, and order check numbers 053661-053754 for $303,530.49 and payroll EFT
0512308-0512339 for $62,802.00.
INFORMATION PACKET:
• Planning Department Update
• Police Department Update
• Public Works Department Update
• Claims List
Medina City Council Work Session Minutes
November 15, 2022
DRAFT
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES OF
NOVEMBER 15, 2022
The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in work session on November 15, 2022, at 6:00
p.m. at the Medina City Hall, 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN.
I. Call to Order
Members present: Cavanaugh, DesLauriers, Martin (virtual attendance), Reid (arrived at
6:40 p.m.)
Members absent: Albers
Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Clerk Caitlyn Walker, Public
Works Director Steve Scherer, Planning Director Dusty Finke, Public Safety Director Jason
Nelson, and City Attorney Dave Anderson
II. Motion to Delegate the Duties to Preside over the Meeting to Council
Member DesLauriers
Cavanaugh made a motion to delegate the duties to preside over the meeting to Council Member
DesLauriers. Martin Seconded the motion. A roll call vote was performed:
Cavanaugh aye
Reid aye
Martin aye
DesLauriers aye
Motion passed unanimously.
III. 340 Clydesdale Trail Concept Discussion with Wellington Management
Steve Wellington, owner, and CEO of Wellington management, presented on Wellington
Management’s property at 340 Clydesdale Trail. Wellington sought comments and feedback
from the City Council on the types of uses they would support for the property. The City Council
expressed they would be most supportive of a restaurant, whether it be a sit-down restaurant, fast
food, or fast casual dining. Wellington and Planning Director Dusty Finke explained why it is
difficult to accommodate enough parking for a sit-down restaurant a drive-thru on this lot.
Wellington shared they have never been approached by this type of tenant. The Council
explained that the comments they hear from the community are that Medina needs more
restaurants, coffee shops, ice cream shops, etc. Wellington acknowledged the importance of
thoughtful planning and finding good users to meet the needs of the community. Wellington
thanked the City Council for their feedback on the types of uses they would support for this
property.
Medina City Council Work Session Minutes
November 15, 2022
IV. Hamel Athletic Club (HAC) Agreements Discussion
Public Works Director Steve Scherer presented on the discussions staff has been facilitating with
the Hamel Athletic Club (HAC) to discuss solutions to concerns about parking and
programming. Staff have been reviewing the City’s contracts with HAC and have discussed
various solutions and changes to the contracts. First, they have discussed changing from a per-
participant fee structure to having HAC pay a lump sum amount that covers the required costs
such as grass maintenance, garbage, recycling, and fieldhouse cleanings. Staff explained this
would allow the City to more effectively charge for the actual costs associated with the HAC
contracts. Council discussed the idea of having a discounted price for Medina residents in the
program and including a charge in the contract for deferred maintenance. Regarding parking
concerns, HAC shared they will work on better education to the participant’s families on
overflow parking areas and improve signage to better direct them to the correct parking areas.
They also discussed the possibility of contracting with the Medina Police Department to help
manage traffic. Regarding program capacity, HAC shared that their program is at full capacity,
and they will not be expanding. Also, the reopening of Hunter Lions Park will help with some of
the parking issues and traffic congestion as they typically utilize this field in their program but it
was under construction during this season. Staff will continue working with HAC based on the
ideas discussed at the work session and report back to the City Council at a later date.
V. Adjourn
Cavanaugh made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:05 p.m. on November 15, 2022. Reid
seconded the motion. A roll call vote was performed:
Cavanaugh aye
Reid aye
Martin aye
DesLauriers aye
Motion passed unanimously.
_________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
____________________________
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
November 15, 2022
1
DRAFT 1
2
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2022 3
4
The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on November 15, 2022 at 5
7:07 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Martin presided. 6
7
I. ROLL CALL 8
9
Members present: Cavanaugh, DesLauriers, Martin (virtual attendance), and Reid. 10
11
Members absent: Albers. 12
13
Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, Attorney Dave Anderson, Finance 14
Director Erin Barnhart, John Christianson of WSB, City Planning Director Dusty Finke, 15
Public Works Director Steve Scherer, City Clerk Caitlyn Walker, and Chief of Police 16
Jason Nelson. 17
18
II. MOTION TO DELEGATE DUTIES TO PRESIDE OVER THE MEETING TO 19
COUNCILMEMBER DESLAURIERS 20
Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Martin, to delegate duties to preside over the 21
meeting to Councilmember DesLauriers. 22
23
A roll call vote was performed: 24
25
Cavanaugh aye 26
Reid aye 27
Martin aye 28
DesLauriers aye 29
30
Motion passed unanimously. 31
32
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:08 p.m.) 33
34
IV. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:08 p.m.) 35
The agenda was approved as presented. 36
37
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:09 p.m.) 38
39
A. Approval of the November 1, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 40
Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Cavanaugh, to approve the November 1, 2022 41
regular City Council meeting minutes as presented. 42
43
A roll call vote was performed: 44
45
Cavanaugh aye 46
Reid aye 47
Martin aye 48
DesLauriers aye 49
50
Motion passed unanimously. 51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
November 15, 2022
2
1
VI. CONSENT AGENDA (7:09 p.m.) 2
3
A. Approve 2023 WSB Rates 4
B. Approve 2023 Timesaver Agreement 5
C. Approve 2023 Solution Builders Agreement 6
Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Reid, to approve the consent agenda. 7
8
A roll call vote was performed: 9
10
Cavanaugh aye 11
Reid aye 12
Martin aye 13
DesLauriers aye 14
15
Motion passed unanimously. 16
17
VI. COMMENTS (7:10 p.m.) 18
19
A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 20
There were none. 21
22
B. Park Commission 23
Scherer reported that the Commission will be meeting the following night to discuss the 24
Meander Boardwalk project and how that relates to the park system, noting that it would 25
most likely focus on trails. He provided an update on recent park improvement projects 26
as well. He noted that the Commission would also be briefed on the recent discussions 27
of the Council with HAC. 28
29
DesLauriers asked if the goal of staff would be to install the fence this year at Hamel 30
Legion Park. 31
32
Scherer confirmed that trees had been cut and the intention was to get the fence 33
installed. He stated that at this time the private landowners do not want to allow staff to 34
work on their side of the fence. He stated that he will order the material and the 35
installation would only take about 1.5 days and could also be done in the spring. 36
37
C. Planning Commission 38
Planning Commissioner Popp reported that the Planning Commission met the previous 39
week to hold a public hearing for the Meander Boardwalk project. He noted that the 40
project consists of two sites divided by Meander Road and would propose residential 41
development to the north and commercial development to the south. He highlighted 42
items of discussion and noted that the Commission generally supported the commercial 43
uses proposed. He stated that most of the discussion from both the public and 44
Commission focused on the proposed lodging use of the residential townhomes 45
proposed. He stated that ultimately the Commission recommended approval of the PUD 46
with the condition that the residential units be sold for residential use, not lodging, and 47
allowing for a lodging use on the southern portion of the property. He stated that the 48
Commission also considered an amendment for the BAPS development, which included 49
the rooftop elements complying with the updated City regulations. He stated that the 50
Commission recommended approval as proposed. 51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
November 15, 2022
3
1
VII. NEW BUSINESS 2
3
A. Resolution Approving Canvass of Returns and Declaring the Results of the 4
Municipal Election Held on November 8, 2022 (7:17 p.m.) 5
Johnson reported that the Council must canvass the results of the election held on 6
November 8th. He stated that the City Clerk drafted the proposed resolution and staff 7
recommends approval. 8
9
Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Reid, to adopt resolution approving canvass of 10
results and declaring the results of the municipal election held on November 8, 2022. 11
12
A roll call vote was performed: 13
14
Cavanaugh aye 15
Reid aye 16
Martin aye 17
DesLauriers aye 18
19
Motion passed unanimously. 20
21
Martin thanked the City Clerk, City staff, and the volunteers that assisted in making the 22
election run smoothly. 23
24
B. City of Independence Request for Sewer Units Discussion (7:19 p.m.) 25
Johnson stated that staff received a request from the City of Independence for an 26
additional 26 sewer units. 27
28
Finke stated that the Council discussed this request in August and expressed some 29
concerns. He stated that staff completed additional analysis as requested and found 30
that they are approaching capacity on the existing sewer main as it gets closer to 31
Highway 12, where Medina’s future development would connect. He stated that based 32
on those projections of development within Medina and the projections from this 33
development in Independence it would approach capacity but there would be capacity to 34
support that development. He stated that the Council also expressed interest in staff 35
reviewing the sewer fee charges for these proposed units and there was openness for 36
these new units to pay those fees. He stated that the amendments seem relatively 37
straightforward, and if desired, staff could draft that. He noted that the agreement would 38
need to be signed by all parties involved in the agreement and not just Medina and 39
Independence. He was unsure of the opinion the other communities would have. 40
41
Scherer commented that capacity level would make him a bit nervous, should this move 42
forward. He stated that perhaps WSB could speak to the different levels of capacity. 43
44
Christianson stated that WSB reviewed the capacity of the gravity sewers in both the 45
location where Independence connects as well as where Medina connects to the 46
regional system. He stated that there is enough capacity for the net 26 units proposed, 47
but that would approach the full board capacity of the system. He stated that with sewer 48
they want to be conservative to avoid the risk of damage or backup. He stated that it 49
could be reasonable to try to allow for capacity for future conditions. 50
51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
November 15, 2022
4
Scherer referenced the modeling and asked how much the unaccounted things are 1
factored in, such as inflow and rain events. 2
3
Christianson replied that the future flow projections estimate the average flows for a 4
typical home or commercial user, along with a peaking factor which includes an 5
allowance for inflow and infiltration. 6
7
Cavanaugh asked if the main sewer line runs down 12. 8
9
Christianson reviewed the route the line follows. 10
11
Martin asked the opinion of Christianson on whether or not the City should agree to the 12
additional units, given the anticipated development south of this site or whether the City 13
should not agree to the additional units. 14
15
Christianson replied that typically he does not allow infrastructure to dictate whether 16
development should move forward, as larger infrastructure can always be built to 17
accommodate development. He stated that in this instance they would approach the 18
border line of the sewer capacity and the option is available to upsize the sewer. 19
20
Finke noted that is a short run that would need to be upsized and asked if that was 21
calculated. 22
23
Christianson confirmed that about 500 feet of line would need to be upsized to provide 24
additional capacity. 25
26
Scherer stated that he and Stremel did a ballpark analysis and estimated about 27
$400,000. He recognized that is still a high cost and everyone in the agreement would 28
need to agree to the cost. 29
30
Finke stated that as the agreement does not necessarily contemplate capacity updates, 31
it does provide calculations for repairs. He provided additional details on the 32
calculations for the different communities involved. 33
34
Martin noted that Medina could suggest that all cities participate in an upgrade to 35
accommodate future development and share in the cost proportionately. She stated that 36
it would be made clear that this would be related to capacity, but Medina would still 37
control the additional capacity. 38
39
Cavanaugh noted that would change the terms of the agreement and therefore everyone 40
would need to sign off. 41
42
Finke stated that the agreement will have to be changed to allow the additional flow to 43
Independence and therefore it would make sense to have both items considered at the 44
same time. 45
46
Cavanaugh asked why Greenfield or Loretto would agree to that. 47
48
Finke commented that would be a good question and the same question could be asked 49
of Medina. 50
51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
November 15, 2022
5
DesLauriers recognized that Medina’s share would still be $160,000 of the estimated 1
$400,000. He asked if the developer in Independence would be willing to foot that cost 2
in order to move forward with their development. He stated that he could not imagine 3
going to Loretto to ask for $130,000 to increase capacity in Independence. 4
5
Finke stated that Independence will have to make those arguments. 6
7
Cavanaugh stated that the City could authorize the units if the developer or 8
Independence pays for the cost to increase capacity. 9
10
Martin commented that she wants to be a good neighbor as this would be an important 11
development for Independence, but also recognizes the need for Medina to protect its 12
own ability to develop in the future. 13
14
DesLauriers asked how often WSB sees a 90 percent capacity level. 15
16
Christianson commented that level is relatively high, and most pipes are not that full. 17
18
Finke asked when WSB would recommend an increase in size or secondary pipe. 19
20
Christianson stated that it varies based on the community, how built out that community 21
is, and the potential for future development. He stated that because there is 22
developable land in the service area that does not have a certainty in the amount of flow 23
that would be generated, it would make sense to be more conservative. 24
25
Scherer stated that this situation is also complicated because there are four cities 26
involved. He stated that if Medina were monitoring everything itself that would be 27
different, noting that the City does not have control over the other three systems. 28
29
Christianson confirmed that a peaking factor was included in the modeling to account for 30
unknowns in other communities. He explained how that factor is estimated. 31
32
Johnson asked if the Council should take action or whether there should be additional 33
discussions. 34
35
Finke stated that it seemed there was consensus that the Council would like staff to 36
have conversations with Independence as to whether they would support the cost for 37
increased capacity and if so, the Council would support the additional connections. 38
39
IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (7:40 p.m.) 40
Johnson recognized the hard work of Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk/Assistant to the City 41
Administrator, in the recent elections which ran smoothly. He also recognized Nichole 42
Vogel, Erin Barnhart, and the election judges that assisted with the election. 43
44
X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (7:41 p.m.) 45
Martin echoed the comments on the well-run election. She stated that she received an 46
inquiry from State Representative Kristin Robbins to meet and discuss issues Medina 47
prioritizes prior to the legislative session. She asked staff to provide a list of topics she 48
could discuss. 49
50
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
November 15, 2022
6
Johnson stated that staff also received a request and noted that the representative will 1
attend the January 3rd meeting at which priorities and concerns can be discussed. 2
Martin noted that perhaps staff could prepare a short list that the Council could review at 3
the December work session, noting that internet capacity remains high priority. 4
5
Johnson confirmed that staff will prepare a list to discuss with the Council in December. 6
7
Martin thanked DesLauriers for running the meetings tonight in her absence. 8
9
DesLauriers commented that on Thursday from 6:30 to 8:30 there is an open house in 10
Long Lake on future fire services in the Long Lake area communities. He stated that he 11
will be attending and noted that they are expecting a large turnout. 12
13
XI. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (7:44 p.m.) 14
Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Reid, to approve the bills, EFT 006593E-006609E 15
for $60,586.07, order check numbers 053609-053660 for $686,605.93, and payroll EFT 16
0512274-0512307 for $58,889.91. 17
18
A roll call vote was performed: 19
20
Cavanaugh aye 21
Reid aye 22
Martin aye 23
DesLauriers aye 24
25
Motion passed unanimously. 26
27
XII. CLOSED SESSION: CONSIDER POTENTIAL OFFER TO PURCHASE 28
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1405 HAMEL ROAD PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. 29
13D.05, SUBD. 3(c)(3) 30
Moved by Martin, seconded by Cavanaugh, to adjourn the meeting to closed session at 31
7:46 p.m. to consider potential offer to purchase property located at 1405 Hamel Road 32
pursuant to Minn. Stat. 13D.05, Subd. 3(c)(3). 33
34
A roll call vote was performed: 35
36
Cavanaugh aye 37
Reid aye 38
Martin aye 39
DesLauriers aye 40
41
Motion passed unanimously. 42
43
The meeting returned to open session at 7:57 p.m. 44
45
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
November 15, 2022
7
XIII. ADJOURN 1
Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Reid, to adjourn the meeting at 7:58 p.m. 2
3
A roll call vote was performed: 4
5
Cavanaugh aye 6
Reid aye 7
Martin aye 8
DesLauriers aye 9
10
Motion passed unanimously. 11
12
13
14
__________________________________ 15
Kathy Martin, Mayor 16
Attest: 17
18
____________________________________ 19
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk 20
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
29 30 31 30 31
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 2 34 1 2 3 45
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
26 27 28 27 28 29 30 31
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 2 34 1 2
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
26 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 CITY COUNCIL - 7:00 pm
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1st Tuesdays*
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 29 30 31
WORK SESSION - 6:00 pm
CITY COUNCIL - 7:00 pm
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 3rd Tuesdays*
30 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 34
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PLANNING COMMISSION - 7:00 pm
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 2nd Tuesdays*
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
28 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 PARK COMMISSION - 7:00 pm
3rd Wednesdays*
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S HOLIDAYS
1 23 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ELECTION DAYS
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 CITY EVENTS
25 26 27 28 29 30 1 31
*unless otherwise noted
January 3rd: 5:30 PM City Council Goal Setting Session
April 5th: 6:30 PM Board of Appeal and Equalization Meeting
April 18th: 6 PM - Continuation of Board of Appeal Meeting
April 29th: 8 AM to Noon Clean-up Day
May 17th: Annual Park Commission Park Tour
May 20th: Annual Bicycle Safety Rodeo for Kids
July 5th: Council meeting moved to Wednesday (Independence Day on Tuesday)
August 1st: Night to Unite Neighborhood Celebrations
August 2nd: Council meeting moved to Wednesday (Night to Unite on Tuesday)
September 5th: 6 PM Budget Open House
September 16th: Medina Celebration Day
November 7th: School District Elections
November 8th: Council meeting moved to Wednesday (Election on Tuesday)
December 7th: City Employee Recognition Banquet
JUNE
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
2023
MEETING
CALENDAR
Agenda Item #6A
Resolution No. 2022-XX
December 6, 2022
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES
FOR ELECTIONS HELD IN MEDINA IN 2022
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 204B.16, subd.1 requires the City Council, by ordinance
or resolution, to designate polling places by December 31 of each year for the upcoming year; and
WHEREAS, changes to the polling place locations may be made at least 90 days before
the next election if one or more of the authorized polling places becomes unavailable for use; and
WHEREAS, changes to the polling place locations may be made in the case of an
emergency when it is necessary to ensure a safe and secure location for voting; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that the city
of Medina designates the following polling places for elections conducted in the city in 2023:
Precinct 1 shall be: Medina City Hall
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340
Precinct 2 shall be: Hamel Community Building
3200 Mill Drive
Medina, MN 55340
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk is hereby authorized to designate a
replacement location meeting the requirements of the Minnesota Election Law for any polling
place designated in this Resolution that becomes unavailable for use by the City;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk is hereby authorized to designate an
emergency replacement polling place meeting the requirements of the Minnesota Election Law
for any polling place designated in this Resolution when necessary to ensure a safe and secure
location for voting;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk is directed to send a copy of this
resolution and any subsequent polling place designations to the Hennepin County Elections
Office.
Dated: December 6, 2022
Agenda Item #6B
Resolution No. 202-XX
December 6, 2022
2
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
1
TO: Medina Mayor and City Council
FROM: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk/Assistant to the City Administrator
DATE: November 23, 2022
MEETING: December 6, 2022
SUBJECT: Approval of 2023 Tobacco Licenses
Background
The following businesses have applied to renew their tobacco licenses effective January
1, 2022 through December 31, 2023. All have paid the fee required and submitted the
proper forms.
2023-01 Casey’s Retail Company
2023-02 Medina Golf and Country Club
2023-03 Holiday Companies – CSAH 29
2023-04 Koch’s Korner, LLC
2023-05 Holiday Companies– 200 TH 55
2023-06 Hwy 55 Liquors
2023-07 Inn Kahoots
2023-08 Liquor Depot, Inc
Council Action Requested
Motion to approve the above listed tobacco licenses for 2023.
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item #6C
City of Medina Position Description
PLANNING AND BUILDING ASSISTANTPERMIT TECHNICIAN
City Council Approved: November 16, 2021
Position Title: Planning and Building AssistantPermit
Technician
Department: Planning/Zoning
Supervisor’s Title: Planning Director
Pay Grade: Step 3
FLSA Status: NON-EXEMPT
Work Status: Full-time
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF POSITION
To provide support to the Planning Department with primary responsibility for administering the building
permit process. Coordinates the receipt and issuance of building permits, routes to appropriate parties for
review, processes payments, issues permits and completes relevant reports pertaining to building permits.
Provides support for users of online permit portal and coordinates review workflow within portal.
Provides customer service and administrative support to the Planning Department.
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS
Coordinates the receipt and issuance of building permits. Coordinates process and review workflow
within City’s permitting software. Receives applications, reviews applications for sufficient
information and routes permits for review by appropriate parties as necessary. Applies appropriate
fees, issues permits and accurately processes payments. Ensures state licenses are current.
Provides support for users of the City’s online permit portal. Provide information to residents,
contractors, and other members of the public pertaining related to routine questions pertaining to
building permits, application processes, and property files. Route questions to other staff as
appropriate.
Assists the Planning Department in answering general questions or providing information to
residents and the general public.
Prepares reports, letters, and documents related to Planning/Zoning and Building Inspection activity
for the Metropolitan Council, DNR, MPCA, Metropolitan Council, Bureau of Census, and other
agencies and coordinates efforts with agencies as needed.
Maintains building permit and property record files and scans/converts files to electronic format.
Assists with the process of receiving and distribution of various land use applications to city staff,
city consultants, and outside review agencies or jurisdictions. Assist with maintenance of land use
application project files.
Assigns addresses for subdivisions and notifies county and city assessor of new properties.
Assists in processingProcesses escrows/deposits for permits and inspection reviews.
Maintains Subsurface Treatment System (SSTS) records pertaining to compliance reports,
maintenance, and operating permits.
Maintains Planning Department website.
Maintains Planning Commission records including agendas, minutes, and packets. Prepares
packets for Planning Commission meetings. Prepares mailed notices for public hearings.
Provides administrative support and customer service for Planning Department. Maintains office
supplies for City Hall departments, orders supplies as necessary.
Represents the City of Medina and the Planning Department in a tactful manner that commands
respect of the public, contractors, developers and others.
OTHER DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Commits to creating and maintaining a healthy workplace culture by following the City of
Medina’s core values, which include teamwork, trust, professionalism, and communication.
Provides customer service over the phone, computer, and at the front counter for planning projects.
Notarizes documents for the public for the City.
Performs other related duties as delegated by the supervisor or apparent.
Provides good working habits and a willingness to cooperate with others and contribute in a
positive way to a pleasant working climate.
Agenda Item #6D
City of Medina Position Description PLANNING ASSISTANTAND PERMIT TECHNICIAN
City Council Approved: November 16, 2021
Cross-train in office functions to support City during absence of other staff.
Undertake employee-required training.
HIRING AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS WILL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING
KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND ABILITIES:
Knowledge of municipal operations, City policies, procedures, and ordinances, or the ability to
acquire such knowledge in a relatively short period of time.
Knowledge of, and skill in, the correct use of English in business writing.
Knowledge of guidelines/practices related to records retention.
Skill to communicate with a variety of individuals and handle a variety of customer service
situations.
Strong knowledge and skills in the operation pertinent software packages, including Microsoft
Office applications, database/data management software, and other programs.
Ability to make decisions in accordance with established policies and procedures.
Ability to work independently and plan, organize and prioritize work tasks.
Ability to prepare work results with completeness and accuracy.
Ability to handle interruptions and concentrate on the task at hand.
Ability to handle multiple ongoing tasks and complete work in a timely manner.
Ability to occasionally lift, move and/or carry files, deliveries, and storage boxes.
Ability to use various office equipment.
Machines, tools, and equipment used: City or personal vehicles, computer and printer, phone, scanners,
calculator, and other typical office equipment.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
High school degree or equivalent.
Experience involving construction, building permits, urban planning, municipal administration or
related field (alternatively, two years administrative experience in less related field may be
considered).
DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS
Post-secondary education/training or certification in construction, building permits,
urban/regional planning, or related field.
Two years of experience involving construction, building permits, urban planning, municipal
administration, or related field.
WORKING CONDITIONS
Most work is performed indoor at city hall. The exception is trips to meetings, training and site
visits/inspections to properties in the City for code enforcement review. Generally, the position requires
light lifting, usually less than 10 pounds, with up to 50 pounds on occasion. Aside from cleansers for
cleaning office workspace, no hazardous materials or chemicals are used on this job.
Resolution No. 2022-
December 6, 2022
Member ____ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING RESIGNATION OF
PLANNING AND BUILDING ASSISTANT BRENDA RUTH
WHEREAS, Brenda Ruth began employment with the City of Medina as a Planning and
Building Assistant in the Planning Department on January 28 2022; and
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2022, Brenda Ruth submitted a letter of resignation from her
position addressed to the Planning Director; and
WHEREAS, Brenda Ruth’s resignation from her position is effective December 2, 2022.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that
Brenda Ruth’s letter of resignation is hereby accepted.
Dated: December 6, 2022.
______________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ______
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2022-___
December 6, 2022
Member _________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION 2022-##
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN
THE HOLY NAME LAKE ESTATES SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, the City of Medina (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, organized and
existing under the laws of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, JD Dossier Holdings, LLC (the “Developer”) has constructed improvements
within the platted development known as Holy Name Lake Estates for the purpose of developing
single family lots; and
WHEREAS, the Developer and the City have previously entered into an agreement dated
June 15, 2021 (the “Development Agreement”) related to the development of the Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has completed construction of public street serving the
Subdivision (the “Improvements”); and
WHEREAS, the city engineer has inspected the Improvements, and determined that they
have been constructed in accordance with the plans incorporated in the Development Agreement;
and
WHEREAS, the estimated cost of construction of the Improvements was $298,322.20;
and
WHEREAS, the Development Agreement requires the Developer or the Developer’s
contractor to submit a warranty bond guaranteeing repair or replacement of any defects in the
Improvements for two years following completion as a condition of being accepted by the City.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota
as follows:
1. The City hereby accepts the Improvements, as public improvements upon the date of this
resolution or the date indicated on the warranty bond, whichever is later. Thereafter, the
City shall maintain the Improvements as public improvements, except as provided for
herein.
2. The Developer shall remain responsible to repair or replace defective portions of the
Improvements if they show signs of failure within two years of date of this resolution or
the date indicated on the warranty bond, whichever is later, normal wear and tear excepted.
Agenda Item #6E
Resolution No. 2022-___ 2
December 6, 2022
3. If the Developer fails to repair or replace defective portions of the Improvements as
required herein and pursuant to the Development Agreement, the City may utilize the
warranty bond for such purpose.
4. Upon receipt of the warranty bond and at the discretion of the city engineer, the City
authorizes a reduction of the letter of credit for the Improvements as described herein.
5. Acceptance of the Improvements is subject to the terms and conditions of the letter from
the city engineer dated November 30, 2022
6. City staff and consultants are authorized and directed to take all steps necessary or
convenient to carry out the intent and purpose of this resolution.
Dated: December 6, 2022.
By: ______________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
By: ___________________________
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _______
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council, through City Administrator Scott Johnson
FROM: Jim Stremel, City Engineer
DATE: November 30, 2022
MEETING: December 6, 2022
SUBJECT: 2023 Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project
Background:
The 2023 Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project has been included in the City of
Medina’s capital improvement plan. The existing roadway pavement, portions of the bituminous
trail system, and pedestrian curb ramps need repair and rehabilitation.
The proposed project consists primarily of a pavement mill/overlay of Clydesdale Trail from
roughly 100 feet east of the City’s public works driveway to the intersection at County Road
101. There are also sections of the existing concrete curb, bituminous trail system, and pedestrian
curb ramps that would be replaced with the project.
The next steps are for the City Council to consider the resolution enclosed to order the
preparation of a feasibility report for the 2023 Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project.
If the feasibility is ordered, it is anticipated the City Council would receive the feasibility report
in January in preparation for the Improvement Hearing in February, 2023.
City Council Action Requested:
Consider adoption of the resolution ordering the preparation of a feasibility report on the
improvement.
Agenda Item #6F
1
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. _______
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT ON THE
CLYDESDALE TRAIL PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve Clydesdale Trail from 100 feet east of the City’s public
works driveway to County Road 101 by reconstruction of the roadway pavement and to assess the
benefitted properties for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 429; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Medina,
Minnesota, as follows:
That the proposed improvement, called the 2023 Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project,
be referred to the City Engineer for study and that WSB & Associates is instructed to report to the
City Council with all convenient speed advising the City Council in a preliminary way as to whether
the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made
as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement
as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate the individual assessments
for affected parcels.
Adopted by the Council on December 6, 2022.
By: _______________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
By: ___________________________
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
___________ and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
https://medinamn.sharepoint.com/Shared Documents/Active Packets/CC PACKET - DEC 6/CA Approved/6G - Loram Wetland Replacement Memo.docx
54
0
G
A
T
E
W
A
Y
B
L
V
D
|
BU
R
N
S
V
I
L
L
E
,
M
N
|
55
3
3
7
|
95
2
.
7
3
7
.
4
6
6
0
|
WS
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor Martin and Medina City Council Members
From: Alison Harwood, WSB
Date: November 29, 2022
Re: Loram Scannell Industrial Replacement Plan
City Project No. WR-22-174
WSB Project No. 20451-000
Loram Maintenance of Way proposes to develop approximately 25 acres of land into an industrial
park. The proposed development would include construction of three buildings totaling
approximately 400,000 square feet and associated driveways, parking areas, and stormwater
management areas. The project will result in 1.22 acres of permanent impact to 7 wetlands. The
applicant will mitigate for the impacts at a 2:1 ratio through purchase of 2.44 acres of wetland
from Bank No. 1762, located in Anoka County.
The application was noticed to the Wetland Conservation Act Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP)
on July 19, 2022. Comments were allowed until August 17, 2022. Members of the TEP (LGU,
Hennepin Conservation District, and BWSR) met on August 3, 2022 to discuss the replacement
plan and requested additional analysis of a no-impact alternative and alternatives that further
minimized impacts to wetlands. These comments were provided to the applicant in a Findings of
Fact dated 8/12/2022. The applicant provided responses to the TEP’s comments in a memo
dated 9/14/2022. Following review of the responses, the TEP provided additional comments and
ultimately recommended denial of the applicant’s proposed replacement plan on the grounds that
an alternative existed that both met the needs of the project and further minimized impacts to
wetland (Findings of Fact dated 9/26/2022).
The TEP’s recommendation for denial was brought before the Medina City Council, governing
body for replacement plan Decisions, on October 18, 2022. Based on the Council members’
review of the application materials and TEP’s recommendation, and through discussion with the
LGU representative and applicant, they determined that the applicant had sufficiently evaluated
additional alternatives, none existed that met the needs of the project and avoided wetland
impacts, that the applicant had demonstrated to the satisfaction of the LGU that the proposal
minimized wetland impacts and determined that the applicant’s preferred alternative met the
sequencing requirements of WCA.
Specifically, the Council determined that the applicant has sufficiently demonstrated that the
activity will minimize impacts to wetlands for the following reasons : 1) a two-building layout would
not provide adequate access and circulation for Loram to expand and operate in a portion of the
space and may create safety issues; 2) it is important from a city-perspective for the front of a
building to be aligned parallel to Arrowhead Drive; 3) replacement wetlands would be of higher
quality than those impacted, because the impacted wetlands are of comparatively lower value;
and 4) the applicant has made reasonable and sufficient efforts during project design to modify
the project’s size, scope, and configuration, and to accommodate site constraints, all in an effort
to minimize wetland impacts.
Attached is a draft Notice of Decision document for the Council’s review and approval.
Agenda Item #6G
BWSR NOD Form – November 5, 2019 1
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act
Notice of Decision
Local Government Unit: City of Medina County: Hennepin
Applicant Name: Loram Maintenance of Way (Phil Homan)
Applicant Representative: Kimley-Horn (Ashley Payne)
Project Name: Loram Scannell Industrial LGU Project No. (if any): WR-22-174 (20451)
Date Complete Application Received by LGU: July 19, 2022
Date of LGU Decision: December 6, 2022
Date this Notice was Sent: December 8, 2022
WCA Decision Type - check all that apply
☐Wetland Boundary/Type ☐Sequencing ☒Replacement Plan ☐Bank Plan (not credit purchase)
☐No-Loss (8420.0415) ☐Exemption (8420.0420)
Part: ☐ A ☐ B ☐ C ☐ D ☐ E ☐ F ☐ G ☐ H Subpart: ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ 6 ☐ 7 ☐ 8 ☐ 9
Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only)
Total WCA Wetland Impact Area: 1.22 acre permanent
Wetland Replacement Type: ☐ Project Specific Credits:
☒ Bank Credits: 2.44 acre
Bank Account Number(s): 1762
Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendations (attach if any)
☐ Approve ☐ Approve w/Conditions ☒ Deny ☐ No TEP Recommendation
TEP recommended denial (see attached FOF dated 9/26/2022)
LGU Decision
☒ Approved with Conditions (specify below)1 ☐ Approved1 ☐ Denied
List Conditions: Confirmation of withdrawal of wetland credits
Decision-Maker for this Application: ☐ Staff ☒ Governing Board/Council ☐ Other:
Decision is valid for: ☒ 5 years (default) ☐ Other (specify):
1 Wetland Replacement Plan approval is not valid until BWSR confirms the withdrawal of any required wetland bank credits. For project-
specific replacement a financial assurance per MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 and evidence that all required forms have been recorded on
the title of the property on which the replacement wetland is located must be provided to the LGU for the approval to be valid.
LGU Findings – Attach document(s) and/or insert narrative providing the basis for the LGU decision1.
☒ Attachment(s) (specify): TEP findings of Fact (8/12/2022 and 9/26/2022); October 18 Medina City Council
meeting minutes (Item B)
☒ Summary: Loram Industrial proposes construct 3 buildings and associated infrastructure (parking, utilities,
etc.) which will result in 1.22 acres of impact to 7 wetlands across the site. One of the proposed buildings is
proposed to provide additional warehouse storage for Loram’s existing facility and two of the proposed
buildings are proposed to include additional leasable space. The TEP reviewed the application and provided
comments as noted in the attached TEP Findings of Fact (8/12/2022 and 9/26/22). Based on the TEP’s review,
an alternative exists that would meet the needs of the project and minimize impacts to wetlands.
The TEP’s recommendation was brought before the Medina City Council, governing body for replacement plan
decisions, on October 18, 2022. As detailed in the attached meeting minutes, the City Council determined that
the applicant had sufficiently evaluated additional alternatives and none existed that met the needs of the
BWSR NOD Form – November 5, 2019 2
project and avoided impacts. The City Council found that the applicant has demonstrated sufficient efforts to
minimize wetland impacts, and determined that the applicant’s preferred alternative met the sequencing
requirements of WCA and therefore should be approved. Specifically, the Council determined that the
applicant has sufficiently demonstrated that the activity will minimize impacts to wetlands for the following
reasons : 1) a two-building layout would not provide adequate access and circulation for Loram to expand and
operate in a portion of the space and may create safety issues; 2) it is important from a city-perspective for
the front of a building to be aligned parallel to Arrowhead Drive; 3) replacement wetlands would be of higher
quality than those impacted, because the impacted wetlands are of comparatively lower value; and 4) the
applicant has made reasonable and sufficient efforts during project design to modify the project’s size, scope,
and configuration, and to accommodate site constraints, all in an effort to minimize wetland impacts.
Medina City Council approved the replacement plan at their December 6, 2022 Council meeting.
1 Findings must consider any TEP recommendations.
Attached Project Documents
☒ Site Location Map ☒ Project Plan(s)/Descriptions/Reports (specify): Approved Impact exhibit
Appeals of LGU Decisions
If you wish to appeal this decision, you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you
received the notice. All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director
along with a check payable to BWSR for $500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified
below. The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e-mail.
The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their
representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why
the decision is in error. Send to:
Appeals & Regulatory Compliance Coordinator
Minnesota Board of Water & Soils Resources
520 Lafayette Road North
St. Paul, MN 55155
travis.germundson@state.mn.us
Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision?
☒ Yes1 ☐ No
1If yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process.
Local Appeals Submittal Requirements (LGU must describe how to appeal, submittal requirements, fees, etc. as applicable)
Send petition and $500 to: City of Medina, 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN 55340
Notice Distribution (include name)
Required on all notices:
☒ SWCD TEP Member: Tony Brough ☒ BWSR TEP Member: Jed Chesnut ☐ LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact):
☒ DNR Representative: Melissa Collins, Wes Saunders-Pierce
☒ Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.: Elm Creek Watershed District
☒ Applicant (notice only): Phil Homan, Loram Maintenance of Way
☒ Agent/Consultant (notice only): Ashley Payne, Kimley-Horn
BWSR NOD Form – November 5, 2019 3
Optional or As Applicable:
☒ Corps of Engineers: ☐ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only):
☐ Members of the Public (notice only):
☒ Other: Brenda Ruth, City of Medina; Dusty Finke, City of Medina; Eric Trelstad
Signature: Date: December 8, 2022
This notice and accompanying application materials may be sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to send a
summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 8420.0255, Subp. 3.
s
v
Iu
s
IF
This form can be used to document TEP findings and recommendations related to WCA decisions,
determinations, enforcement and pre -application reviews.
Local Government Unit: City of Medina County: Hennepin
Landowner/Applicant: Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. (Phil Homan)
Agent/Representative(s): Kimley-Horn (Ashley Payne)
Project Name: Loram Medina Industrial Project No. (if any): WR-22-174 (20951)
Project Location:
Purpose of TEP Findings/Recommendation - check all that apply and describe
❑ Pre -application review 14 Application Review (related to WCA Decision)
❑ Local Government Road Wetland Replacement Program Eligibility ❑ WCA Determination Request
❑ Other (specify):
Describe:
Meeting Type — check all that apply and specify dates as applicable
In -Person Meeting(s), Date(s): Virtual, August 3, 2022 ❑ Electronic Exchanges (email, skype, etc.)
❑ Onsite Review(s), Date(s): ❑ Other (specify):
Findings and Recommendations
- Applicant discussion indicated that the immediate needs of the project involve the need for Building 2
(88,0000 sf) and a portion of Building 1 (126,000 sf) to house existing operations for the Loram facility.
Building 3 (182,000 sf) is proposed speculatively to provide space for future, unidentified, users.
- In evaluation of the need for the project, the TEP finds that the applicant has not adequately evaluated
alternatives that avoid impacts to wetlands:
(1) Mn Rule 8420.0520 Subpart 3.0 requires that persons proposing to impact a wetland must provide the
local government unit with documentation describing at least two alternatives that avoid wetland impact, one
of which may be the no -build alternative.
a. The avoidance plan outlines a no -build alternative. The "Full Avoidance Alternative" does not describe the
development that could actually be built while avoiding wetlands. It simply states that it's not feasible. The
applicant needs to show what amount of development is possible while still avoiding wetlands and discuss
how that amount of development meets the needs of the project.
(2) Mn Rule 8420.0520 Subpart 3.C(2) notes that the LGU must determine whether any proposed feasible and
prudent alternatives are available that would avoid impacts to wetlands and (Subpart 3.C(3)) whether a
reasonable modification of the size, scope, configuration, or density of the project could avoid impacts to
wetlands.
a. The applicant evaluated four alternative site configurations, three of which impacted more wetland than
the proposed alternative and one that the TEP was not shown a site configuration for. The application did no
BWSR TEP Findings & Recommendation Form - October 2019
contain feasible and prudent alternatives that demonstrate modifications to the size, scope, configuration or
density that would avoid wetland impacts.
b. The 2-buildling alternative evaluated a building area that was larger than the proposed by 69,860 square
feet. Modification of this alternative is feasible to avoid impacts to wetlands while still meeting the needs of
the project.
- The applicant must provide the wetland mitigation bank information from which the proposed banking
credits will be supplied.
- Application should remove references to farmed wetlands "appearing to have formed in the last 10 years" or
historically not being present. The applicant is not requesting a decision related to incidental wetlands.
The LGU also offers these general comments related to wetlands and buffers on the site:
- A construction and maintenance plan for the wetland mitigation areas proposed along Arrowhead Drive will
be required as part of plan review.
- Wetland buffers are required by City of Medina ordinance. Buffers must be established around wetlands
onsite, or a variance requested if buffers are not feasible.
❑ Attachment(s) (specify):
DNR Protected Waters and Shoreland Protection Zone
Will the project/activity affect DNR public waters, DNR public waters wetlands or wetlands within the
shoreland protection zone? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, DNR representative is a member of the TEP.
Signatures
LGU TEP Member: Alison Harwood
Signature: 6l �C
Agree with Findings & Recommendations: Z Yes ❑ No
Date: 8/12/2022
Z SWCD TEP Member: Tony Brough
Signature:" ....na ......
�`
Agree with Findings & Recommendations: Z Yes ❑ No
Date: 8/12/2022
Z BWSR TEP Member: JeKhesnut
Signature: _ -
Agree with Findings & Recommendations: CXi Yes ❑ No
Y
Date: 8/12/2022
[_1 DNR TEP Member:
Signature:
Agree with Findings & Recommendations: ❑ Yes ❑ No
Date:
BWSR TEP Findings & Recommendation Form - October 2019
2
BWSR TEP Findings & Recommendation Form - October 2019 1
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act
Technical Evaluation Panel Form
This form can be used to document TEP findings and recommendations related to WCA decisions,
determinations, enforcement and pre-application reviews.
Local Government Unit: City of Medina County: Hennepin
Landowner/Applicant: Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. (Phil Homan)
Agent/Representative(s): Kimley-Horn (Ashley Payne)
Project Name: Loram Medina Industrial Project No. (if any): WR-22-174 (20951)
Project Location:
Purpose of TEP Findings/Recommendation - check all that apply and describe
☐ Pre-application review ☒ Application Review (related to WCA Decision)
☐ Local Government Road Wetland Replacement Program Eligibility ☐ WCA Determination Request
☐ Other (specify):
Describe:
Meeting Type – check all that apply and specify dates as applicable
☒ In-Person Meeting(s), Date(s): Virtual, September 22, 2022 ☐ Electronic Exchanges (email, skype, etc.)
☐ Onsite Review(s), Date(s): ☐ Other (specify):
Findings and Recommendations
The TEP reviewed the applicant’s replacement plan application (dated 7/18/2022) and comment response
memo (dated 9/14/2022) and provides the following findings:
Applicant provided eight total alternatives and TEP review of each is provided below:
No Build: The No Build alternative would not build a project. The applicant determined this would not meet
the purpose and need of the project. The TEP concurs this is not a feasible and prudent alternative.
Full Avoidance (from 9/14/2022 memo): The full avoidance alternative included 1 building totaling 196,000
square feet. The applicant determined this alternative does not meet the purpose and need as it would be too
large for Loram’s purposes but does not provide opportunity for additional tenants making the project
economically not feasible. The LGU concurs with the need for providing space for tenants. The TEP concurs
that the no-impact alternative is not feasible and prudent.
Alternative 1 (EAW Alternative): This alternative included 3 buildings totaling 449,000 square feet. This
alternative impacted more wetland so was rejected. The TEP concurs this is not a feasible and prudent
alternative.
L-Shaped Building: This alternative included 2 buildings, including an L-shaped building. This alternative would
require Loram equipment (including tele handling equipment and cranes) to use Arrowhead to move between
buildings. Because of this traffic conflict, the alternative was eliminated. The TEP concurs that the L-Shaped
Building alternative is not feasible and prudent.
BWSR TEP Findings & Recommendation Form - October 2019 2
Two Buildings (from 7/18/22 application): This alternative included 2 buildings totaling 465,860 square feet.
The applicant determined this alternative created traffic conflict on Arrowhead and impacted more wetland;
therefore, it was rejected. The TEP concurs that this alternative is not feasible or prudent; however, requested
a modified version of this plan (TEP findings dated 8/12/22) that included 2 buildings but avoided additional
wetland area.
Three Buildings Parallel to Arrowhead: This alternative included 3 buildings configured to run parallel to
Arrowhead Drive. The applicant determined this alternative would impact the functionality of the campus and
would not reduce wetland impacts so rejected this alternative. The TEP concurs that this alternative is not
feasible or prudent.
Three Buildings: This alternative was presented by the applicant as their preferred alternative. This alternative
totaled 396,000 square feet and proposed impacts to approximately 1.3 acres of wetland. As noted in the
8/12/22 TEP findings document, the TEP required the evaluation of additional alternatives that modified the
size, scope, configuration, or density of the project and avoided wetland impacts.
Revised Two-Building alternative (from 9/14/2022 memo): This alternative includes 2 buildings totaling
380,100 square feet. The applicant determined that this alternative does not meet the purpose and need
because it is a 2-buildling vs. 3-building concept, which they indicate was the purpose of the project. They also
indicate that this alternative is problematic for traffic, provides limited employee parking, and is
approximately 16,000 square feet less than their preferred alternative.
The Applicant’s 7/18/2022 application stated that the purpose of the project was to expand their current
campus and provide a facility for other supporting businesses to expand and develop within the same
industrial development as Loram. The TEP finds that the revised 2-buildling alternative meets the purpose and
need stated in the application, is feasible and prudent, and minimizes wetland impacts. The reduction in
square footage by 16,000 square feet does not make the project economically infeasible, the concept layout
appears to have vacant areas where additional parking could be provided, and the interaction between trucks
and employee traffic does not appear to create a public safety hazard. The TEP recommends the City of
Medina approves the 2-building alternative plan, which impacts approximately 33,492 square feet (0.77 acre)
of wetland while preserving the wetland along Arrowhead Drive.
The applicant stated they are intending to purchase mitigation credits for replacement at a 2:1 ratio. The TEP
will require evidence of agreement from a bank owner prior to Decision.
☐Attachment(s) (specify):
DNR Protected Waters and Shoreland Protection Zone
Will the project/activity affect DNR public waters, DNR public waters wetlands or wetlands within the
shoreland protection zone? ☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, DNR representative is a member of the TEP.
Signatures
☒LGU TEP Member: Alison Harwood Agree with Findings & Recommendations: ☒ Yes ☐ No
Signature: Date:
☒SWCD TEP Member: Tony Brough Agree with Findings & Recommendations: ☒ Yes ☐ No
Signature: Date: Date: 9/26/2022
9/26/2022
BWSR TEP Findings & Recommendation Form - October 2019 3
☒BWSR TEP Member: Jed Chesnut Agree with Findings & Recommendations: ☒ Yes ☐ No
Signature: Date: 8/12/2022
☐DNR TEP Member:Agree with Findings & Recommendations: ☐ Yes ☐ No
Signature: Date:
9/26/2022
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
October 18, 2022
1
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 2022
The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on October 18, 2022 at
7:03 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Martin presided.
I. ROLL CALL
Members present: Albers, Cavanaugh, Martin, and Reid (arrived at 7:50 p.m.).
Members absent: DesLauriers.
Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, Attorney Dave Anderson, City
Engineer Jim Stremel, City Planning Director Dusty Finke, Public Works Director Steve
Scherer, City Clerk Caitlyn Walker, and Police Sergeant Kevin Boecker.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:03 p.m.)
III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:03 p.m.)
Johnson stated that staff is requesting to add an item to the agenda, Closed Session:
Attorney-Client Privileged Discussion Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 13D.05, Subd. 3(b) to
Discussion Threatened Litigation by Chris and Michelle Sele.
Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers, to add the requested item to the agenda and
approve the agenda as amended. Motion passed unanimously.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:04 p.m.)
A. Approval of the October 4, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes
Martin stated that prior to the meeting Johnson distributed proposed changes that she
had proposed to the minutes for incorporation.
Cavanaugh noted on page nine, lines eight and nine, and asked those to be stricken.
Moved by Martin, seconded by Cavanaugh, to approve the October 4, 2022 regular City
Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously.
V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:06 p.m.)
A. Resolution 2022-80 Certifying Delinquent Utility Charges to the Hennepin
County Auditor for Collection in 2023
B. Resolution 2022-81 Certifying Delinquent Storm Water Utility Charges to
Hennepin County Auditor for Collection in 2023
C. Resolution Certifying 2022-82 Delinquent City Charges for Service to the
Hennepin County Auditor for Collection in 2023
D. Approve Escrow Agreement for 1735 Medina Road
E. Adopt Resolution 2022-83 Granting Extension of Time to BAPS Minneapolis
LLC Site Plan Review Approval
F. Adopt Ordinance Establishing Hamel Townhomes Storm Sewer
Improvement Tax District
G. Adopt Resolution Authorizing Publication of Hamel Townhome Storm
Sewer Improvement Tax District by Title and Summary
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
October 18, 2022
2
H. Resolution 2022-84 Approving Pioneer Highlands Preliminary Plat
I. Approve Pioneer Highlands Preliminary Development Agreement
Johnson requested that Items F and G be pulled from the Consent Agenda and placed
later on in the agenda as four members are needed, and Reid is running late.
Martin agreed that those items could be placed under Old Business.
Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers, to remove Items F and G from the Consent
Agenda to be considered under Old Business. Motion passed unanimously.
Moved by Albers, seconded by Cavanaugh, to approve the consent agenda as
amended. Motion passed unanimously.
VI. COMMENTS (7:07 p.m.)
A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda
There were none.
B. Park Commission
Scherer provided an update on the progress at Legion Park. He stated that they
canceled the Park Commission meeting for lack of items to be considered.
C. Planning Commission
Planning Commissioner Ron Grajczyk reported that the Planning Commission met the
previous week to discuss the concept review plan for the Cates Industrial Park. He
stated that resident input was received related to traffic, potential issues with noise from
trucks, as well as views. He stated that the Commission discussed screening and
potential changes to the layout to place the loading docks in the center. The
Commission also reviewed the preliminary plat and site plan review for Loram and
Scannell and discussed the wetlands and potential impacts, the potential to reduce the
number of buildings and increased landscaping. The Commission acknowledged the
work of the applicant to lessen the wetland impacts and ultimately the item was
recommended for approval with a vote of four to two.
Albers asked why the two members voted against the request.
Grajczyk replied that the wetlands were the main factor in that decision.
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Cates Industrial Park Concept Plan Review (7:16 p.m.)
Johnson stated that the applicants have requested a review for approximately 310,000
square feet of warehouse/office/light industrial development on 30 acres of the subject
site.
Finke commented that the Council has reviewed this use several times over the past
year and conditionally approved a reguiding of the property within the Comprehensive
Plan and under the current staging period, contingent upon site plan approval. He
stated that the applicant proceeded with a similar concept to what had been preferred by
the Council in the last review and is requesting one last round of input before proceeding
to formal application. He stated that there were some comments at the Planning
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
October 18, 2022
3
Commission meeting related to the residential properties to the east and the potential to
orientating the loading docks to the center of the site. He stated that the applicant did
receive that input and provided an updated concept, which he displayed for the Council.
He stated that the orientation of the loading docks in this manner would make them
exempt to the 10 percent loading dock limitation. He commented that this concept is the
same square footage as the previously submitted concept, just changing the orientation.
He stated that there would be some limited impact to a wetland in this concept, about
1,800 square feet. He stated that there would be some wetland impacts in order to
realign Cates Ranch Drive as well. He summarized the additional information available
in the packet. He stated that staff would like to direct as much traffic as possible to
Willow Drive as that provides the most stacking opportunity and most direct path to
Highway 55. He commented that some residents raised concerns with concentrating the
truck traffic on the new access at Cates Ranch Drive. He stated that most of the
employee traffic would come from the other routes. He stated that the applicant has
attempted to address some of the comments received during the Planning Commission
meeting in the updated concept.
Martin asked about the landscaping and screening in the plans.
Finke stated that the applicant indicated that there is likely space for a six-foot berm in
that area.
Cavanaugh commented that if the buildings are orientated north/south it is not as
attractive from the roadside.
Martin echoed those comments.
Finke commented that from an architectural standpoint there is less building frontage.
Albers commented that he prefers the north/south orientation as it moves it away from
the eastern property line. He noted that it is less wall to look at as you drive along, and
this layout makes more sense than the other layout presented in the packet.
Martin asked if that would include the condition of continuing the modulation along the
exterior visible from the right-of-way and residential, with the only industrial feeling sides
being the loading dock sides.
Finke stated that additional vegetation could be added to screen along Chippewa Road.
Albers agreed that additional modulation would be desired.
Martin commented that it seemed the staff recommendations address her comments.
Cavanaugh asked if there would be sufficient turning radius for semitrucks if the loading
docks are faced back-to-back.
Finke provided additional details and noted that each concept provides similar space for
the trucks.
Cavanaugh stated that perhaps offices wrap around the southern portion of the building.
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
October 18, 2022
4
Martin agreed that she would like to see glass front on the south side of both buildings
and the north side.
Finke asked if the Council would desire access and parking on both sides, or just the
appearance noting that if actual access were desired there would be additional wetland
impacts.
Albers commented that the north/south orientation seems to have less impervious
surface as everything is concentrated in the middle, which would be better for
stormwater.
Jay Moore, Oppidan, commented that they are hopeful they can come to a consensus
on the best plan to move forward noting that they have been working on this for one
year. He stated that originally, they had planned for both parcels and then reduced that
at the direction of the Council to only proceed with 30 acres. He stated that their goal
has been to minimize wetland impacts through this development. He confirmed that the
space for the trailer court would be more than adequate for truck maneuvering. He
stated that they also agree to realign Cates Ranch Drive and will place signage alerting
truck drivers to exit the site to Willow Drive. He stated that the previous concept was
106 feet from the eastern property line but after the comments of the neighbor at the
Planning Commission, they were able to move 200 feet from that property line. He
commented that these are quality buildings, and he can provide better pictures of the
elevations. He stated that even though it will be the side of the building, there will be
glass and other building materials.
Martin asked if it would be feasible for the applicant to have a three-sided design as
discussed, as the building will be street visible on three sides. She asked for examples
of similar Oppidan projects.
Moore advised of projects in other communities. He commented that there will be glass
on the sides, but they cannot put glass on the southern sides as that would not work for
the intended use.
Cavanaugh commented that he sees this as lacking, noting the southwest corner of the
east building is very plain and will be most visible for traffic coming around the curve. He
stated that he likes the project and wants it to work for everyone, but it would be nice to
have a better appearance on that corner.
Moore commented that he believes that the elevations could be better represented as he
believes that those buildings will look nice. He commented that Medina already requires
higher design and building materials. He noted that the cost for these buildings has
increased $3,000,000 in the last 60 days and this is the most expensive project they
have considered. He commented that this would be an elevated design.
Cavanaugh asked if the change in cost is due to design changes or the cost in materials.
Moore replied that the change is due to the cost of materials and inflation.
Martin stated that perhaps landscaping could be used to dress up that corner.
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
October 18, 2022
5
Moore commented that there are clear store windows and stone, but to have glass
around the back of the building where receiving would be located would not be feasible.
He asked if there were examples of industrial buildings which would have those design
materials required.
Cavanaugh noted that there are not. He stated that in the other concept the offices face
the roadway.
Moore asked if the Council has seen the properties to the west of Willow which were
built in the 90s.
Cavanaugh commented that none of these members were on the Council at that time.
Moore commented that this is modern architecture and class AA.
Finke replied that the truck court does setback on the southwest corner of the building
and therefore there would be opportunity to focus on that corner. He commented that
there are not docks on the immediate corner as laid out.
Moore commented that they would be happy to enhance landscaping in that area.
Cavanaugh commented that he would prefer to have the offices face the south side but
still did not want to impact the neighbor to the east.
Finke asked if the footprint could shift a bit to the east, which would gain a bit more
space along Chippewa for landscaping.
Martin agreed that could be helpful.
Albers stated that he prefers the north/south orientation and did not have a problem
shifting slightly to the east if that would help hide the south façade along Chippewa.
Martin asked where the customer entrances would be for the east building.
Finke replied that would be located on the east side of that building.
Martin agreed that moving the footprint slightly to the east could provide more room and
flexibility for perhaps a screening wall and/or landscaping.
Moore asked if the suggestion was to move the buildings further apart.
Martin agreed that the suggestion would be to move both buildings another ten feet to
the east.
Finke stated that staff could work with the applicant.
Cavanaugh asked if the applicant prefers the new concept over their previously
submitted concept.
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
October 18, 2022
6
Moore confirmed that the most recent concept is more efficient and also addresses the
comments and concerns raised by the neighboring property owners and Planning
Commission. He commented that they believe that this is a better plan.
Cavanaugh noted that the Planning Commission has not seen this concept.
Finke explained that this orientation was suggested by the Planning Commission.
Moore explained that the thought was that this layout would minimize the impact (noise,
lights) from truck traffic at the loading docks on neighboring property owners.
Martin stated that she supports this updated concept, moving it slightly to the east to
allow more flexibility for landscaping.
Cavanaugh noted that he would still prefer the other orientation because of the view
from Chippewa.
Reid arrived.
Reid commented that she believes the buildings will look very nice and believed that the
applicant can work with staff to work through the kinks. She believed that this could
proceed to formal application.
Albers agreed that he prefers this orientation as it will reduce the amount of impervious
surface and meets the other goals, as well as addressing the concerns of the adjacent
residents. He asked if the applicant would plan to fence the property.
Moore replied that they would not fence the property.
Cavanaugh asked if the buildings would be built on speculation or whether tenants
would be secured first.
Moore replied that is yet to be determined.
B. Loram/Scannell Plat and Site Plan Review (7:53 p.m.)
Johnson stated that the applicants have requested land use approval for the proposed
development of three buildings and the primary question before the Council is whether
the applicant has proven that this development would minimize the impact to wetlands.
Finke stated that a fuller review of the material related to plat and site plan was included
in the packet for context. He stated that depending on the outcome of the discussion
related to the wetland impacts and replacement plan, the plans may need to be adjusted
and therefore the plans have not been updated to reflect the comments of staff as of yet.
He stated that the current layout proposes 1.22 acres of wetland impacts. He stated that
wetland impacts are subject to Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) review and approval.
He stated that the Council serves as the deciding body related to wetland replacement
plans. He stated that the impacts and replacement plan were reviewed by the Technical
Evaluation Panel (TEP) and the TEP recommended denial, noting that report was
included in the packet. He stated that the Planning Commission reviewed the overall
development and recommended approval of the proposed development with a vote of
four to two. He displayed the updated layout as submitted by the applicant and identified
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
October 18, 2022
7
the proposed wetland impacts. He stated that beyond the WCA and in technically
meeting the State law, the City has identified wetland protection as an objective in the
community. He stated that staff reviewed previous wetland impacts and replacement
plans approved by the City noting that this would be one of the largest impacts
proposed. He noted the other large wetland impact projects which were the Chippewa
Road extension and Wellshire project.
Martin asked how this has been addressed in other applications to reduce the overall
impact proposed. She commented that there is a large wetland in the middle of the
Motorplex complex that became an amenity that was built around. She referenced the
wetland on the western edge which seems to be the highest quality wetland on the site.
Finke noted that there were not any impacts to the center wetland on the Motorplex site
through that development. He stated that developer attempted to make that an amenity
for the site. He stated that OSI built their parking lot around the wetland to minimize
impacts on the north side of the building.
Allison Harwood, WSB, reviewed the City’s responsibility as the LGU for WCA and the
entities that provide input in that process through the TEP. She explained the purpose
of WCA and the review process that is completed by the TEP. She stated that the
applicant submitted a wetland replacement plan in July proposing 1.27 acres of wetland
impact to seven wetlands across the site and replacement was to be provided through
the purchase of offsite credit banks. She explained that the purpose and need is
considered when reviewing these plans. She stated that there is some wetland
replacement proposed but is not proposed to be included in the replacement plan as it is
not designed to the standard WCA would require and therefore is not part of the
calculation. She also commented on the lack of wetland buffer in that area. She stated
that the TEP met with the applicant and provided details on that process noting that only
one alternative was provided at that time and two alternatives are required. She noted
no plans were submitted that showed any efforts to further minimize wetland impacts
and therefore an avoidance alternative was required by the TEP. She stated that the
applicant submitted the additional information as requested and noted that the TEP
preferred the two-building concept provided as an alternative that would avoid the
wetland to the west. She explained that the applicant stated that the concept did not
meet their needs. She stated that the TEP concurs that the one building concept would
not be feasible or prudent, but the revised two building concept would meet the
applicant’s needs while also reducing the impact to wetlands. She stated that based on
the information received to date, the TEP recommends that the wetland replacement
plan be denied because two parts of the WCA have not been complied with.
Phil Holman, CEO of Loram and Medina resident, stated that he has worked for Loram
for about 30 years and this land was purchased over 50 years ago for the future
expansion of the company. He stated that Loram is proud to call Medina its
headquarters while operating in eight countries in the world and exporting products to
countries all over the world. He commented on the large number of employees working
at Loram in Medina. He stated that Loram has been in this location since the 1960s and
has expanded on the existing facility multiple times in that time. He stated that his office
stares to the south, therefore he would look at this building from his office. He noted that
he also owns a condo in the Motorplex and would see the property from that site and
would also see the project from the roadway as a citizen. He stated that he would not
promote any development that he would not be proud of as a Medina resident. He
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
October 18, 2022
8
believed that this would be a great taxbase for the community and addition. He stated
that the needs of Loram are first and foremost and while the two-building concept may
not impact public safety, it would impact the safety of Loram which he takes very
seriously.
Cavanaugh asked the number of people that would work in the new three buildings.
Holman replied that these would mostly be warehouse buildings noting that Loram
currently has 13 people employed in the warehouse. He explained that they also have
contracted warehouse space in other communities and within the Hamel location. He
noted that this would not necessarily be an expansion of their employment for that
purpose but would consolidate those operations. He provided general estimates on the
number of employees that could be added between the different buildings.
Brian Wurdeman, Kimley-Horn, commented on their understanding of the high
importance of wetlands to the City, and they have done their best to maximize the site
design while maintaining the higher quality/DNR wetland to the east. He explained that
the site was delineated in 2020 with the City approving that delineation in October of
2021. He commented that many of the wetlands did not appear to be visible until more
recently with the largest wetland along Arrowhead Drive being farmed as recently as
2012 with little to no vegetation. He stated that the wetland areas have been disturbed
through the activities on the property and the majority of the wetlands are generally
much lower quality wetlands than the DNR to the east which they have focused on
protecting. He stated that they submitted through the WCA review and the TEP and
applicant agreed that the one building concept would not meet the needs and demand of
the applicant. He stated that there were a number of challenges with the two-building
scenario that conflict with the demand and need for the project by the applicant. He
stated that there is concern with the safety of Loram employees with the northern
access. He stated that Hennepin County would like to see the majority of the traffic
coming in from the existing Loram access on the southern part of the property which
creates a significant challenge for truck movement and creates safety challenges for
employees coming in and out of the western side of the building. He stated that the
parking plan also does not meet City ordinance. He stated that in January they
submitted an EAW with a three-building concept that showed 2.3 acres of wetland
impact for approximately 450,000 square feet between the buildings and that received a
negative declaration by the City. He stated that through that process they received
public comment and understood the importance of minimizing wetland impacts, therefore
they reduced the project size to 396,000 square feet between the buildings. He noted
that many different concepts were reviewed in order to arrive at the proposed concept.
He stated that this concept was presented to the City in April with 1.6 to 1.7 acres of
wetland impacts and has been reduced to 1.2 acres of impact. He stated that they have
made a number of changes including bump outs in the parking and wetland replacement
along Arrowhead. He stated that the applicant proposes to replace the impacted
wetlands at a ratio of 2:1 and would be creating a half-acre of wetland onsite as well.
Albers commented that it seems there is a lot more parking than the number of
employees that would be housed in these new buildings.
Wurdeman replied that they are proposing the minimum required parking.
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
October 18, 2022
9
Finke replied that two of the buildings are speculative and therefore that would be a bit
difficult to predict. He noted that although there would be relatively low employee count,
there is a lot of square footage. He stated that they are meeting the minimum based on
the assumptions. He stated that the existing Loram facility is predominantly office and
admittedly is under parked. He noted that there would not be a lot of space for proof of
parking.
Reid asked if the applicant feels that they have explored all possible alternatives.
Wurdeman commented that based on the three buildings proposed and square footage
deemed necessary, he is confident that this is the most efficient proposal to fit on the
property, meet the needs of the applicant, and minimize wetland impacts.
Reid asked if there are any candidates for the wetland credits.
Wurdeman replied that they have begun to identify where those credits will come from
but have not yet solidified the location.
Martin referenced the comments related to the low quality of the wetlands on the site
and that they had previously been farmed. She stated that when reading through the
rules, that does not mean that those would fall under wetlands that would not be
protected and therefore they would still need to be protected under WCA.
Wurdeman commented that there is a difference of professional opinion between their
classification of the wetlands and the classification of the TEP but stated that they are
proceeding as if all of the wetlands have the same classification.
Martin referenced the statement as to what is feasible or needed for the project and was
not sure how the project is to be defined pursuant to Minnesota law. She recognized
that the applicant would like three buildings but perhaps the project could still be feasible
with a lesser square footage or different configuration. She stated that she does see
Loram’s need for the first building with potentially a need for space in a second building
in the future. She did not necessarily see in the narrative provided by the applicant a
need for Loram’s operations to have the third building and asked who decides what the
need of the project would be.
Anderson commented that it is a balancing act with the different things that the LGU has
to take into account. He commented that there is nothing that defines who gets to say
what the project is. He agreed with Martin that some of the improvements do not seem
to be necessary, at least at this time. He stated that the TEP has provided its
recommendation, although the LGU would have the authority to deviate. He commented
that there is some room for discretion on deciding whether these factors should dictate
whether this is approved or denied.
Martin stated that she found it helpful in the original presentation by staff to see what
other applications have received approval for wetland banking. She noted that it would
seem that this is a very expansive or efficient use of the land. She commented that this
seems much more filled or crammed compared to the previous concept that was
received for the Cates project.
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
October 18, 2022
10
Wurdeman commented that the size footprint shown is consistent with the approved
EAW. He commented that they kept the elements that the Council liked from that
concept and addressed many of the other comments received. He commented that this
is an efficient layout of the site which is consistent with the EAW.
Martin commented that the purpose of the EAW is to determine when an EIS would be
needed, and it is not a vote on what may be presented as a potential project. She stated
that they made clear at that time that the negative declaration did not provide approval of
the concept plan presented. She stated that she struggles with where they begin,
recognizing that the EAW presented a larger project which has been downsized but was
unsure that would be considered in the review of the TEP.
Anderson agreed that the scope of the EAW review is very narrow as it simply
determines if further environmental review would be needed. He stated that concerns
were expressed at that time about the level of activity proposed by the development and
with impacts to the wetlands.
Martin referenced the issue of whether the developer has attempted to minimize wetland
impacts and asked if the EAW could be considered as an attempt to reduce the scale
and impact. She noted that she never considered what was presented in the EAW as
the first plan, although she could see where the property owner could think that it was.
Harwood stated that it is not uncommon for an EAW to look at the most intense or dense
development, as the purpose is to determine whether an EIS would be needed. She
reviewed the priority of WCA to avoid or minimize wetland impacts, therefore the first
step would be to determine what could be done to avoid and if that could not be done, it
should have been presented as to what could have been presented to minimize impacts.
She stated that is the step that is missing as the alternatives that have been provided by
the developer have only shown more impacts and not less. She stated that the two-
building concept seems to be feasible to meet the needs of the project. She stated that
the process is meant to be fluid, with the TEP providing input and the applicant then
making adjustments.
Finke stated that to the technical question as to who defines the project, it would be the
LGU which in this case would be the Council.
Scott Moe, Scannell Properties, commented that there is an economic element as well
as there is an economy of scale to make the project work as well. He stated that this
does not exceed hardcover by Code and industrial projects tend to be more dense in
nature. He stated that the coverage of the previous Cates project is not much different,
although the layout was different. He stated that building one is designed to attract a
company that seeks a higher image with frontage to the public side, such as a civil
engineering firm that may have field equipment in the back. He provided other examples
such as a custom cabinet maker or a medical manufacturer. He noted that there could
be three to four tenants in that building. He noted that building would not be a
distribution center. He stated that building three would be designed to attract similar
users, bigger in size and more industrial in nature and provided examples. He
commented that it would not be a heavy truck type of facility. He stated that this design
has a nice drive by appeal as building one will appear as a two-story office building for
those driving by. He stated that building would also screen the truck courts from those
driving by, which would not be provided in the two-building concept. He stated that if
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
October 18, 2022
11
more parking were needed for building two, they would cut into the footprint for building
three but noted that would be unlikely. He stated that they made their best attempt to
develop a project that would meet the functional and economical requirements of this
type of park while working towards the environmental sensitivities. He commented that
this will bring good companies and jobs to Medina in a project that has good drive by
appeal while improving the environmental condition of the area. He stated that the
wetland authorities have done a good job in completing their technical review, but their
review is limited in scope in that they consider a wetland to be a wetland. He explained
that these are farmed wetlands and have been dry in most conditions. He stated that
they would be replacing those at a ratio of 2:1 with real wetlands while also improving
and increasing the size of a wetland onsite. He stated that one of the Planning
Commission members stated that it is not the job of the governmental body to make the
determination on the wetlands but noted that is exactly what the Council has been
elected to do in using their common sense and judgement to determine what is best for
the community.
Cavanaugh commented that he thinks the beginning impact was 2.3 acres which has
been reduced to 1.2 acres. He commented that he likes the design with the building
facing the road as that makes sense and hides the back activity and truck traffic. He
commented that having that front building is important to him. He stated that in the two-
building alternative, there would be a safety issue with heavy equipment. He stated that
there would be about 230 jobs which would be a huge thing for Medina. He noted that
those people will frequent businesses in the community. He referenced the large
wetland along Arrowhead noting that it would be difficult to do anything with the site
involving a building that would front the road without impacting that wetland. He
recognized that the additions to the wetland may not be up to Code, but the applicant is
still making that improvement to be a good steward. He noted that another impact would
be unavoidable in order to provide the safety lane to the building to the north. He stated
that the other wetlands are relatively small. He stated that he would love to see the
wetlands replaced onsite but recognized that is probably not possible and noted that he
would love to see it replaced in Medina. He stated that he likes the proposal and
believes that the applicant has made a lot of changes, therefore he would support the
request.
Finke stated that it is important to recognize that this is not necessarily the preferred
building alternative as it could be possible to have a three-building design with less
square footage.
Cavanaugh commented that this is an industrial area, and he likes the layout as
presented.
Albers commented that he agrees that the wetlands in the middle of the plowed fields
are not a concern of his. He commented on other wetlands mentioned that seasonally
dry up and most likely do not house high quality vegetation.
Harwood agreed that in some years those areas have been hayed or cropped or
avoided in wetter years. She agreed that there is not a diverse plant community, but it
does provide some habitat for the species that would use it such as waterfowl that use
the seasonally flooded basins along with water quality.
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
October 18, 2022
12
Albers agreed that there is benefit to water quality in the filtration provided but noted that
those wetlands have been disturbed so much, that if they would be replaced, he would
support the three-building concept. He believed that this would be a good design for the
site. He asked for details on snow removal and snow storage as that could push salt
into the wetlands. He stated that he is okay with the plan as presented as well as the
impacts proposed.
Reid commented that there are candidates for the wetland credits, therefore that is a
minor concern that could easily be solved. She believed that the applicant has explored
alternatives and only minor issues remain.
Martin recognized the consensus of the Council that the impacts have been adequately
addressed. She noted that the decision would need to be correlated with why the
Council found that sufficient efforts have been taken to avoid and minimize wetland
impacts. She stated that she also likes the three-building layout.
Cavanaugh stated that if there is a two-building layout it would not lend towards access
to the northerly site.
Martin agreed that if you are looking at this as a building campus, the northerly wetland
would need to be impacted in order to utilize that area which is between buildings one
and two on the plan.
Cavanaugh referenced the large wetland along Arrowhead and stated that from a City
perspective it is important to have a building aligned with the road. He stated that if that
is pushed back it would create many other issues for the site and therefore that impact
becomes unavoidable. He believes that the applicant has minimized that to the extent
possible. He stated that the smaller wetlands do not add much to the water quality of
the general area as they have been farmed and what would be provided through the 2:1
replacement would be of much higher quality. He stated that the applicant has done a
good job in maintaining the higher quality wetland which provides water quality benefit.
Albers commented that the replacement wetland would be of higher quality than what
exists on the site today, with perhaps the exception of wetland five. He noted that the
wetlands are farmed and may have hydric soils that may show a wetland, but the
replacement would be of higher quality and function, therefore he believes that this
makes sense to move forward with the proposal for three buildings.
Reid commented that some of the existing wetlands are very low quality, and the land
bank purchases would be of higher quality and therefore did not see a problem. She
stated that she also believes that the applicant made effort to deal with the wetland
issues and is comfortable moving forward.
Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Albers, to direct staff to prepare a Notice of
Decision approving the proposed Wetland Replacement Plan based upon the findings
noted by the Council and to present the Notice for Council action after the applicant has
submitted necessary information related to wetland credit purchase. Motion passed
unanimously.
C. G & S & K Family LLC – Easement Vacation – Public Hearing (9:23 p.m.)
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
October 18, 2022
13
Johnson commented that the applicant is the fee owner of 1400 and 1420 Tamarack
Drive and has requested a lot line rearrangement between two properties. He stated
that the lot line rearrangement has not yet been prepared for review but was noticed for
this meeting, therefore staff recommends that the public hearing be opened and
continued to the next meeting.
Martin opened the public hearing.
No comments.
Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers, to continue the public hearing on the proposed
easement vacation at 1400 and 1420 Tamarack Drive to November 1, 2022. Motion
passed unanimously.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. Adopt Ordinance 695 Establishing Hamel Townhomes Storm Sewer
Improvement Tax District (9:25 p.m.)
Johnson noted that these two items were on the Consent Agenda but there were not the
required number of Councilmembers present to take action.
Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers, to adopt Ordinance Establishing Hamel
Townhomes Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District. Motion passed unanimously.
B. Adopt Resolution 2022-85 Authorizing Publication of Hamel Townhome
Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District by Title and Summary
Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers, to adopt Resolution Authorizing Publication of
Hamel Townhome Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District by Title and Summary.
Motion passed unanimously.
IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (9:26 p.m.)
Johnson had nothing further to report.
X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (9:27 p.m.)
No comments.
XI. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (9:27 p.m.)
Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Albers, to approve the bills, EFT 006558E-006575E
for $65,985.16, order check numbers 053491-53552 for $475,149.52, and payroll EFT
0512212-0512245 for $57,610.94. Motion passed unanimously.
Johnson stated that staff is recommending changing the order of the closed session
items.
XII. Closed Session: Attorney-Client Privileged Discussion Pursuant to Minn.
Stat. 13D.05, Subd. 3(b) to Discussion Threatened Litigation by Chris and
Michelle Sealy
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
October 18, 2022
14
Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers, to adjourn the meeting to closed session at 9:29
p.m. for attorney-client privileged discussion on threatened litigation by Chris and
Michelle Sealy. Motion passed unanimously.
The meeting returned to open session at 9:59 p.m.
XIII. CLOSED SESSION: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED DISCUSSION ON
LITIGATION RELATED TO ZONING VIOLATION AT 2402 STATE HIGHWAY 55
PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. 13D.05, SUBD. 3(b)
Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers, to adjourn the meeting to closed session at 10:00
p.m. for attorney-client privileged discussion on litigation related to zoning violation at
2404 State Highway 55 pursuant to Minn. Stat. 13D.05, Subd. 3(b). Motion passed
unanimously.
The meeting returned to open session at 10:19 p.m.
XIV. POTENTIAL ADOPTION TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FOR
LITIGATION RELATED TO 2402 TH 55
Moved by Martin, seconded by Reid, to adopt Resolution 2022-86 approving settlement
agreement and mutual release. Motion passed unanimously.
XV. ADJOURN
Moved by Albers, seconded by Reid, to adjourn the meeting at 10:20 p.m. Motion
passed unanimously.
Kathy Martin, Mayor
Attest:
Scott Johnson, City Administrator
Resolution No. 2022-XX
December 6, 2022
Member _______ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX
RECOGNIZING LORETTO FIRE CHIEF JEFF LEUER FOR BEING NAMED FIRE
OFFICER OF THE YEAR
WHEREAS, Loretto Fire Chief Jeff Leuer has been a valued Chief serving the City for the
past fourteen years; and
WHEREAS, Chief Leuer has served as a member of the Loretto Fire Department since
1993; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota State Fire Association annually recognizes the efforts of
outstanding fire officers in the state of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Chief Leuer was presented the Fire Officer of the Year Award on October 21,
2022; and
WHEREAS, the City of Medina recognizes Chief Leuer for this great and distinguished
honor; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Medina
acknowledges and thanks Chief Jeff Leuer for his years of service to Medina and recognizes him
for the outstanding honor of receiving the Fire Officer of the Year Award on October 21, 2022.
Dated: December 6, 2022.
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _____
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same: (Absent:)
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Agenda Item #8A
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Erin Barnhart, Finance Director
DATE: December 1, 2022
SUBJ: 2023 Final Budget
This 2023 budget reflects the Council’s property tax levy and budget discussions throughout 2022.
When approved, this budget will be the basis for the final 2023 property tax levy to be certified to
Hennepin County in December 2022. The County will then use the certified property tax levy for
final 2023 property tax calculations.
General Fund - see attachment A
The General Fund is the primary operating fund for the governmental operations of the City.
Activities enabled by General Fund planning include police protection and community support,
fire prevention and suppression, planning and zoning, street maintenance and repair, parks and
recreation, sanitation and waste removal, as well as engineering, legal and general administrative
functions.
The following are primary areas in which increases are budgeted:
Inflation Increases
• Fuel ~$13,000
• Materials/Supplies
• Contracted Services – addition of surcharges
Staffing
• Second Police Sergeant – promotion of existing Police Officer ~$8,000
• Full-time Police Officer ~$100,000
• Full-time Accounting Technician ~$85,000
• COLA 3.5% + 1.5% Market Inflation Adjustment ~$138,837
General Increases
• Insurance (property & auto)
• Fire Contracts ~35,000
Future Fire – transfer of $455,000
Health insurance renewals for 2023 increased 1.9% (split between City and employee.) The
preliminary budget estimated a 15% increase. The 2023 final budget includes the reduced amount
of $23,000.
Agenda Item #9A
2
Property Tax Levy – see attachments A-E
The property tax levy allocates 85% to the general fund for general operations of the City
(includes transfer of $455,000 to future fire facility). Debt service comprises 7% and capital
levies (Municipal Park, Roads and Equipment) comprise 8%.
Calculations from Hennepin County estimate a 19.3% market value increase and a 20.1% tax
capacity increase for pay 2023. Of the market value increase, 2.5% is attributed to development
growth in 2021 (20 new single-family homes, 42 townhome units and commercial development).
Proposed 2023 tax rate: 22.596%; 0% increase from 2022.
Pre-existing debt service levies have increased by $16,449. Capital levies for the Municipal Park
Fund and Equipment Fund have no increase and the addition of $61,000 for the Capital Road Fund
Levy (payable to Hennepin County over the next seven years). The overall total levy increase for
2023 amounts to $1,020,349.
Property Tax Levy: 2022 2023 Change
General Fund $4,147,600 $5,090,500 $942,900
Capital Equipment 312,500 312,500 0
Capital Road Fund $0 $61,000 $61,000
Municipal Park Fund 112,000 112,000 0
Road Improvement Debt Service 59,403 60,155 $752
Building Debt Service 349,094 364,791 $15,697
Total Levy $4,980,597 $6,000,946 $1,020,349
Property Tax Distribution – see attachments F-I
Property taxes are distributed to several districts/agencies. Medina property taxes are distributed
to Hennepin County, one of four school districts (Wayzata, Delano, Orono and Rockford), the
City of Medina and metro taxing districts (regional railroad authority, county parks, mosquito
control, etc.)
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) – see attachment J
The CIP is a 5-year plan in place to determine long-term project & equipment needs. Capital
improvement projects are funded by a combination of assessments, bonding, grants, state aid,
developer contribution and the following funds:
• Road Fund
• Equipment Fund
• Revolving Capital Fund
• Water Capital Fund
• Sewer Capital Fund
• Storm Water Fund
• Water Utility Fund
• DWI Forfeiture Fund
• Municipal Park Fund
• Park Dedication Fund
2023 Road Projects
• Hackamore
• Juniper Curve/Spruce
• Townline Rd S
• Pinto off Hamel Rd
• Foxberry
• Clydesdale Tr
3
• Medina Highlands
• Cherokee Rd
• Cheyenne Tr
• Meadow Woods
• Morgan Rd
Utility Rate Increases
Water 1%
Sewer 1%
Storm Water 3%
Reserve Fund
A fund balance policy was established with specific guidelines the City of Medina will use to
maintain an adequate level of fund balance within the General Fund, which is the main operating
fund of the City. To provide for cash flow requirements, emergency and contingency needs, and
funds for specific programs because major revenues, including property taxes and other
government aids are received in the second half of the City’s fiscal year. A minimum of 5
months of tax related operating expenditures is required.
2022 Reserve Balance - $1,270,408
2022 Assigned Reserves - $658,979 (ARPA, Litigation, Railroad Crossing, Retirement, Comp Plan, Uptown
Hamel, ALHOA)
2022 Available Reserves - $611,429 (reserve balance less assigned reserves)
Actions Needed
Motion to approve Resolution Approving Final Budget for 2023
Motion to approve Resolution Approving Final Levy for 2023
CITY OF MEDINA
GENERAL FUND
PRELIMINARY 2023 BUDGET
2023 Amount Percentage
2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Actual Budget Actual Budget YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
1 Property Tax Levy 3,434,452 3,344,141 3,731,800 3,620,188 4,147,600 2,111,039 5,090,500 942,900 22.7%
2 Other Taxes 75,000 91,711 75,000 104,420 85,000 58,315 75,000 (10,000)-11.8%
3 Licenses and Permits 390,669 717,380 391,269 776,618 492,500 710,667 509,400 16,900 3.4%
4 Intergovernmental 288,773 824,640 288,773 700,634 303,773 352,998 283,998 (19,775)-6.5%
5 Charges for Services 138,087 99,332 141,254 148,867 143,074 135,291 147,871 4,797 3.4%
6 Fines and Forfeitures 95,000 77,157 95,000 63,903 95,000 45,879 55,000 (40,000)-42.1%
7 Special Assessments 0 439 0 32 0 0 0 0 N/A
8 Miscellaneous 164,359 303,106 131,875 54,835 240,881 239,235 122,018 (118,863)-49.3%
9 Sale of Assets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
10 Transfers In 220,784 220,784 227,409 272,409 234,230 279,230 286,257 52,027 22.2%
11 Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources 4,807,124 5,678,690 5,082,380 5,741,908 5,742,058 3,932,655 6,570,044 827,986 14.4%
EXPENDITURES & OTHER FINANCING USES:
General Government:
12 Mayor & Council 25,544 25,525 25,544 26,575 25,544 24,275 25,544 (0)0.0%
13 Administration 662,230 667,970 664,268 644,691 691,552 584,193 809,831 118,279 17.1%
14 Elections 15,400 34,817 15,400 364 24,617 21,601 24,692 75 0.3%
15 Assessing 98,065 104,750 104,315 102,018 172,499 112,485 172,500 1 0.0%
16 Planning & Zoning 191,032 162,923 191,094 181,960 206,624 187,529 213,116 6,492 3.1%
17 Comprehensive Plan 8,000 0 8,000 0 8,000 0 8,000 0 0.0%
18 Data Processing 88,704 87,517 90,704 92,164 101,000 92,616 104,000 3,000 3.0%
19 Police/Public Works Facility 77,500 77,527 79,500 61,394 87,800 77,320 89,300 1,500 1.7%
20 Municipal Building 61,000 44,012 58,800 42,775 56,400 40,258 59,800 3,400 6.0%
21 Unallocated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
22 Total General Government 1,227,475 1,205,040 1,237,625 1,151,941 1,374,036 1,140,276 1,506,782 132,746 9.7%
Public Safety:
23 Police 1,737,110 1,818,689 1,849,789 1,872,072 2,023,300 1,769,018 2,253,577 230,277 11.4%
24 Police Records Management 13,500 9,142 13,500 9,599 14,200 10,079 10,250 (3,950)-27.8%
25 Fire 419,111 453,225 408,130 422,483 441,448 458,167 476,281 34,833 7.9%
26 Building Inspections 330,664 425,195 329,479 458,271 441,953 368,351 482,467 40,514 9.2%
27 Emergency Management 5,800 146,986 5,800 6,574 6,050 4,657 6,250 200 3.3%
28 Total Public Safety 2,506,185 2,853,237 2,606,698 2,769,000 2,926,951 2,610,272 3,228,824 301,873 10.3%
Public Works:
29 Public Works 751,401 640,113 743,356 614,492 793,620 719,098 840,377 46,757 5.9%
30 Sanitation & Recycling 26,001 13,798 26,539 14,601 25,322 6,730 24,103 (1,219)-4.8%
31 Total Public Works 777,402 653,911 769,895 629,093 818,942 725,828 864,480 45,537 5.6%
Parks & Recreation:
32 Community Building 41,808 28,494 42,076 42,242 40,035 42,530 43,526 3,491 8.7%
33 Parks 193,373 176,663 186,341 185,588 231,241 198,534 252,764 21,523 9.3%
34 Total Parks & Recreation 235,181 205,156 228,417 227,831 271,276 241,064 296,290 25,014 9.2%
Economic Development Housing 56,880 0 57,010 0 57,907 0 60,949 3,042 5.3%
35 Transfers Out 4,000 4,000 4,000 504,000 147,174 147,174 112,718 (34,456)-23.4%
36 Reserves 0 0 178,734 0 0 0 45,000 45,000 N/A
37 Transfer to Fire Facility 0 0 0 0 145,771 145,771 455,000 309,229 212.1%
Total Transfers 4,000 4,000 182,734 504,000 292,945 292,945 612,718 319,773 109.2%
38 Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses 4,807,123 4,921,344 5,082,379 5,281,864 5,742,058 5,010,385 6,570,044 827,986 14.4%
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES AND
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES OVER (UNDER)
39 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 1 757,346 1 460,044 (1) (1,077,731)0 0 -133.1%
1
Attachment A
City of Medina
2023 Property Tax Levy Scenario Summary
Actual Proposed
Pay Pay
2022 2023
Property Tax Information:
1 Estimated Market Value Change (Taxable)N/A 19.3%
2 Estimated Tax Capacity Change (Taxable)N/A 19.8%
3
4 General Fund Levy $4,147,600 $5,090,500
5 % Change N/A 22.7%
6
7 Debt Service & Capital Levies $832,997 $910,446
8 % Change N/A 9.3%
9
10 Total Levy $4,980,597 $6,000,946
11 % Change N/A 20.5%
12
13 City Local Tax Capacity Rate 22.596% 22.598%
14 % Change N/A 0.0%
15
16
17 Estimated Property Taxes:
18
19 $700,000 Home With No Market Value Change $1,695 $1,695
20 % Change N/A 0.0%
21
22 $700,000 Home With 16.5% Market Value Increase $1,695 $2,025
23 % Change N/A 19.5%
24
25 $5,000,000 C/I Property With No Market Value Change $22,257 $22,154
26 % Change N/A -0.5%
27
28 $5,000,000 C/I Property With 16.5% Market Value Increase $22,257 $25,988
29 % Change N/A 16.8%
2
Attachment B
City of Medina
Property Tax Levies
2023 Proposed
Proposed Amount Percentage
Pay Pay Increase Increase
2022 2023 (Decrease) (Decrease)
1 General Fund Levy 3,997,600 4,635,500 637,900 16.0%
2 Future Fire Facility 150,000 455,000 305,000 203.3%
3 Total General Fund Levy 4,147,600 5,090,500 942,900 22.7%
4
5 Debt Service & Capital Levies:
6
7 Public Works and Police Department Facility:
8
9 2012A G.O. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Bonds - $6.1 million 216,615 364,791 148,176 68.4%
10 2013A G.O. Refunding Bonds (2007A recharacterized CIP portion)132,479 0 (132,479) -100.0%
11
12 Total Public Works and Police Department Facility 349,094 364,791 15,697 4.5%
13
14 Other Debt Service:
15
16 2011B Taxable G.O. Improvement Bonds - Hunter Drive North 0 0 0 N/A
17 2015A G.O. Improvement Bonds - Tower Drive 59,403 60,155 752 1.3%
18
19 Total Other Debt Service 59,403 60,155 752 1.3%
20
21 Capital Levies:
22
23 Municipal Park Fund Levy 112,000 112,000 0 0.0%
24 Capital Road Fund Levy 0 61,000 61,000 N/A
25 Capital Equipment Fund Levy 312,500 312,500 0 0.0%
26
27 Total Capital Levies 424,500 485,500 61,000 14.4%
28
29 Total Debt Service & Capital Levies 832,997 910,446 77,449 9.3%
30
31 Total Levies 4,980,597 6,000,946 1,020,349 20.5%
3
Attachment C
City of Medina
2023 Proposed Property Tax Scenario
Residential Homesteads
2022 2023 2022-2023
Budget Proposed Change
1 City Tax Rate:22.596%22.596%0.0%
2
3 General Fund Levy:$4,147,600 $5,090,500 $942,900
4
5 Debt Service & Capital Levies:$832,997 $910,446 $77,449
6
7 Total Levy:$4,980,597 $6,000,946 $1,020,349
8
9 Change in Total Levy:20.5%
10
11 2022 CITY PROPERTY TAXES
12
13 Homestead City Local City
14 Market Market Value Tax Tax Capacity Property
15 Value Exclusion Capacity Rate Taxes
16 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022
17
18 $100,000 ($28,200)$718 22.596%$162
19 $200,000 ($19,200)$1,808 22.596%$409
20 $300,000 ($10,200)$2,898 22.596%$655
21 $400,000 ($1,200)$3,988 22.596%$901
22 $500,000 $0 $5,000 22.596%$1,130
23 $600,000 $0 $6,250 22.596%$1,412
24 $700,000 $0 $7,500 22.596%$1,695
25 $800,000 $0 $8,750 22.596%$1,977
26 $900,000 $0 $10,000 22.596%$2,260
27 $1,000,000 $0 $11,250 22.596%$2,542
28
29 2023 CITY PROPERTY TAXES (WITH NO MARKET VALUE CHANGE)
30
31 Market Homestead City Local City Property Percentage
32 Value Market Value Tax Tax Capacity Property Taxes Tax
33 2022 Exclusion Capacity Rate Taxes Increase Increase
34 NO CHANGE 2023 2023 2023 2023 (Decrease)(Decrease)
35
36 $100,000 ($28,200)$718 22.596%$162 $0 0.0%
37 $200,000 ($19,200)$1,808 22.596%$409 $0 0.0%
38 $300,000 ($10,200)$2,898 22.596%$655 $0 0.0%
39 $400,000 ($1,200)$3,988 22.596%$901 $0 0.0%
40 $500,000 $0 $5,000 22.596%$1,130 $0 0.0%
41 $600,000 $0 $6,250 22.596%$1,412 $0 0.0%
42 $700,000 $0 $7,500 22.596%$1,695 $0 0.0%
43 $800,000 $0 $8,750 22.596%$1,977 $0 0.0%
44 $900,000 $0 $10,000 22.596%$2,260 $0 0.0%
45 $1,000,000 $0 $11,250 22.596%$2,542 $0 0.0%
46
47 2023 CITY PROPERTY TAXES (WITH MARKET VALUE INCREASE)
48
49 Market
50 Value Homestead City Local City Property Percentage
51 2022 Market Value Tax Tax Capacity Property Taxes Tax
52 INCREASE OF Exclusion Capacity Rate Taxes Increase Increase
53 16.5%2023 2023 2023 2023 (Decrease)(Decrease)
54
55 $116,500 ($26,800)$897 22.596%$203 $40 24.9%
56 $233,000 ($16,300)$2,167 22.596%$490 $81 19.9%
57 $349,500 ($5,800)$3,437 22.596%$777 $122 18.6%
58 $466,000 $0 $4,660 22.596%$1,053 $152 16.8%
59 $582,500 $0 $6,031 22.596%$1,363 $233 20.6%
60 $699,000 $0 $7,488 22.596%$1,692 $280 19.8%
61 $815,500 $0 $8,944 22.596%$2,021 $326 19.3%
62 $932,000 $0 $10,400 22.596%$2,350 $373 18.9%
63 $1,048,500 $0 $11,856 22.596%$2,679 $419 18.6%
64 $1,165,000 $0 $13,313 22.596%$3,008 $466 18.3%
65
66 2023 CITY PROPERTY TAXES (WITH MARKET VALUE INCREASE)
67
68 Market
69 Value Homestead City Local City Property Percentage
70 2022 Market Value Tax Tax Capacity Property Taxes Tax
71 INCREASE OF Exclusion Capacity Rate Taxes Increase Increase
72 18.9%2023 2023 2023 2023 (Decrease)(Decrease)
73
74 $118,900 ($26,500)$924 22.596%$209 $47 28.7%
75 $237,800 ($15,800)$2,220 22.596%$502 $93 22.8%
76 $356,700 ($5,100)$3,516 22.596%$795 $140 21.3%
77 $475,600 $0 $4,756 22.596%$1,075 $174 19.3%
78 $594,500 $0 $6,181 22.596%$1,397 $267 23.6%
79 $713,400 $0 $7,668 22.596%$1,733 $321 22.7%
80 $832,300 $0 $9,154 22.596%$2,069 $374 22.1%
81 $951,200 $0 $10,640 22.596%$2,404 $427 21.6%
82 $1,070,100 $0 $12,126 22.596%$2,740 $481 21.3%
83 $1,189,000 $0 $13,613 22.596%$3,076 $534 21.0%
4
Attachment D
City of Medina
2023 Proposed Property Tax Scenario
Commercial/Industrial Properties
2022 2023 2022-2023
Budget Budget Change
1 City Tax Rate:22.596%22.596%0.0%
2
3 General Fund Levy:$4,147,600 $5,090,500 $942,900
4
5 Debt Service & Capital Levies:$832,997 $910,446 $77,449
6
7 Total Levy:$4,980,597 $6,000,946 $1,020,349
8
9 Change in Total Levy:20.5%
10
11 2022 CITY PROPERTY TAXES
12
13 City Local City
14 Market Tax Tax Capacity Property
15 Value Capacity Rate Taxes
16 2022 2022 Pay 2022 2021
17
18 $1,000,000 $18,500 22.596%$4,180
19 $2,000,000 $38,500 22.596%$8,700
20 $3,000,000 $58,500 22.596%$13,219
21 $4,000,000 $78,500 22.596%$17,739
22 $5,000,000 $98,500 22.596%$22,257
23 $6,000,000 $118,500 22.596%$26,777
24 $7,000,000 $138,500 22.596%$31,296
25 $8,000,000 $158,500 22.596%$35,815
26 $9,000,000 $178,500 22.596%$40,334
27 $10,000,000 $198,500 22.596%$44,854
28
29 2023 CITY PROPERTY TAXES (WITH NO MARKET VALUE CHANGE)
30
31 Market City Local City Property Percentage
32 Value Tax Tax Capacity Property Taxes Tax
33 2022 Capacity Rate Taxes Increase Increase
34 NO CHANGE 2023 Pay 2023 2023 (Decrease)(Decrease)
35
36 $1,000,000 $18,500 22.596%$4,180 $0 N/A
37 $2,000,000 $38,500 22.596%$8,700 $0 N/A
38 $3,000,000 $58,500 22.596%$13,219 $0 N/A
39 $4,000,000 $78,500 22.596%$17,738 $0 N/A
40 $5,000,000 $98,500 22.596%$22,257 $0 N/A
41 $6,000,000 $118,500 22.596%$26,777 $0 N/A
42 $7,000,000 $138,500 22.596%$31,296 $0 N/A
43 $8,000,000 $158,500 22.596%$35,815 $0 N/A
44 $9,000,000 $178,500 22.596%$40,334 $0 N/A
45 $10,000,000 $198,500 22.596%$44,854 $0 N/A
46
47 2023 CITY PROPERTY TAXES (WITH MARKET VALUE INCREASE)
48
49 Market
50 Value City Local City Property Percentage
51 2022 Tax Tax Capacity Property Taxes Tax
52 INCREASE OF Capacity Rate Taxes Increase Increase
53 16.5%2023 Pay 2023 2023 (Decrease)(Decrease)
54
55 $1,165,000 $21,800 22.596%$4,926 $746 17.8%
56 $2,330,000 $45,100 22.596%$10,191 $1,491 17.1%
57 $3,495,000 $68,400 22.596%$15,456 $2,237 16.9%
58 $4,660,000 $91,700 22.596%$20,721 $2,982 16.8%
59 $5,825,000 $115,000 22.596%$25,986 $3,728 16.8%
60 $6,990,000 $138,300 22.596%$31,251 $4,474 16.7%
61 $8,155,000 $161,600 22.596%$36,516 $5,220 16.7%
62 $9,320,000 $184,900 22.596%$41,781 $5,965 16.7%
63 $10,485,000 $208,200 22.596%$47,046 $6,711 16.6%
64 $11,650,000 $231,500 22.596%$52,311 $7,457 16.6%
65
66 2023 CITY PROPERTY TAXES (WITH MARKET VALUE INCREASE)
67
68 Market
69 Value City Local City Property Percentage
70 2022 Tax Tax Capacity Property Taxes Tax
71 INCREASE OF Capacity Rate Taxes Increase Increase
72 18.9%2023 Pay 2023 2023 (Decrease)(Decrease)
73
74 $1,189,000 $22,280 22.596%$5,034 $854 20.4%
75 $2,378,000 $46,060 22.596%$10,408 $1,708 19.6%
76 $3,567,000 $69,840 22.596%$15,781 $2,562 19.4%
77 $4,756,000 $93,620 22.596%$21,155 $3,416 19.3%
78 $5,945,000 $117,400 22.596%$26,528 $4,271 19.2%
79 $7,134,000 $141,180 22.596%$31,901 $5,125 19.1%
80 $8,323,000 $164,960 22.596%$37,275 $5,979 19.1%
81 $9,512,000 $188,740 22.596%$42,648 $6,833 19.1%
82 $10,701,000 $212,520 22.596%$48,022 $7,687 19.1%
83 $11,890,000 $236,300 22.596%$53,395 $8,541 19.0%
5
Attachment E
CITY OF MEDINA
PROPERTY TAX SHARE BY TAXING AUTHORITY
PROPOSED PAY 2023
Share 2023
in Cents Proposed Tax Rate
County $0.40 34.805%
Schools $0.27 23.820% *
City $0.26 22.596%
Other $0.07 6.047% **
$1.00 87.268%
* School District #284 Wayzata
** Other includes various metro taxing districts, and other special taxing districts (excluding watershed)
County
$0.40 Schools
$0.27
City
$0.26
Other $0.07
6
Attachment F
CITY OF MEDINA
PROPERTY TAX SHARE BY TAXING AUTHORITY
PROPOSED PAY 2023
Share 2023
in Cents Proposed Tax Rate
County $0.38 34.805%
Schools $0.31 28.359% *
City $0.25 22.596%
Other $0.07 5.968% **
$1.00 91.728%
* School District #879 Delano
** Other includes various metro taxing districts, and other special taxing districts (excluding watershed)
County
$0.38 Schools
$0.31
City
$0.25
Other $0.07
7
Attachment G
CITY OF MEDINA
PROPERTY TAX SHARE BY TAXING AUTHORITY
PROPOSED PAY 2023
Share 2023
in Cents Proposed Tax Rate
County $0.43 34.805%
Schools $0.21 17.187% *
City $0.28 22.596%
Other $0.08 6.053% **
$1.00 80.641%
* School District #278 Orono
** Other includes various metro taxing districts, and other special taxing districts (excluding watershed)
County
$0.43 Schools
$0.21
City
$0.28
Other $0.08
8
Attachment H
CITY OF MEDINA
PROPERTY TAX SHARE BY TAXING AUTHORITY
PROPOSED PAY 2023
Share 2023
in Cents Proposed Tax Rate
County $0.37 34.805%
Schools $0.32 29.820% *
City $0.24 22.596%
Other $0.07 6.303% **
$1.00 93.524%
* School District #883 Rockford
** Other includes various metro taxing districts, and other special taxing districts (excluding watershed)
County
$0.37 Schools
$0.32
City
$0.24
Other $0.07
9
Attachment I
2023 CIP: DEPARTMENT
Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Potential Revenue Source
Roads
1 Hackamore Street Section 6,400,000$ 1,500,000$ Developer/Medina/Corcoran/LRIP/MSA
2 Juniper Curve/Spruce 31,000$ 31,000$ Assessment Escrow Fund
3 Townline Rd S.369,000$ 184,500$ Assessment Escrow Fund
4 Foxberry - Phase I 293,774$ 146,887$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
5 Foxberry - Phase 2 215,254$ 107,627$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
6 Pinto off Hamel Rd 10,000$ 5,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
7 Clydesdale trail overlay 600/101 409,785$ 204,893$ Road/Bonds/Assessments/MSA
8 Medina Highlands 135,000$ 67,500$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
9 Cherokee Rd 24,000$ 12,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
10 Cheyenne Tr.52,000$ 26,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
11 Meadow Woods 73,000$ 36,500$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
12 Morgan Rd 20,000$ 10,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
13 Wild Meadows North 219,746$ 109,873$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
14 Willow N. of 24 RECLAIM 570,000$ 455,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
15 Chestnut Rd 22,000$ 11,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
16 Morningside 317,000$ 158,500$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
17 Tamarack N of Medina to Blackfoot Overlay 54,000$ 43,200$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
18 Dusty Tr. & Deerhill 36,000$ 18,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
19 Meander Rd E.20,000$ 10,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments/MSA
20 Meander Rd W.33,000$ 16,500$ Road/Bonds/Assessments/MSA
21 Willow S. of 24 168,000$ 134,400$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
22 Tamarack - Medina to 24 - Overlay 49,985$ 39,988$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
23 Tamarack City Limits to CSAH 24 Overlay 77,675$ 62,140$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
24 South Frontage Rd 25,000$ 12,500$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
25 Evergreen Rd - East of 101 28,000$ 14,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
26 Bella-Terra 22,000$ 11,000$ Road/Bonds/Assessments
27 Tamarack/HWY 55 5,500,000$ -$ Developer/Assessments
28 Roads Sub-total 8,032,813$ 2,331,907$ 1,128,746$ 734,373$ 438,660$ 324,228$ 75,000$ 37,500$ 5,500,000$ -$
29
30 Public Works
31 Tandem 400,000$ 400,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
32 Water Truck / Tanker Replacement 20,000$ 20,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
33 F-350 Pickup w/ Plow 80,000$ 80,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
34 Bucket Truck - Used 30,000$ 30,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
35 Utility Tractor - Harley Rake 57,500$ 57,500$ Parks
36 Replace F-550 & Plow 85,000$ 85,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
37 Utility Truck - Water/Sewer 100,000$ 100,000$ Water/Sewer Utility Fund
38 Skid Steer Upgrade w/ Bucket 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
39 Single Axle Truck 319,000$ 319,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
40 Public Works Sub-total 374,000$ 374,000$ 485,000$ 485,000$ -$-$157,500$ 157,500$ 85,000$ 85,000$
41
42 Police
43 PD Squad Cars 150,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
44 Traffic Squad Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
45
Police Security Cameras / Building / Interview
Rooms 40,000$ 40,000$ DWI Forfeiture Fund/Cap Equip
46 Records Management 120,000$ 120,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
47 Portable Radios DWI Forfeiture Fund/Cap Equip
48 Squad Radios 55,000$ 55,000$ DWI Forfeiture Fund/Cap Equip
49 Audio Video Upgrades for EOC/Training Room 10,000$ 10,000$ DWI Forfeiture Fund/Cap Equip
50 Miscellaneous 5,000$ 5,000$ 8,000$ 8,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ DWI Forfeiture Fund/Cap Equip
51 Police Sub-total 205,000$ 205,000$ 228,000$ 228,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 215,000$ 215,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$
52
53 Fire
54 HAMEL
55 Ongoing PPE Replacement 12,000$ 12,000$ 12,000$ 12,000$ 12,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
56 Engine 12 Replacement 29,412$ 29,412$ 29,412$ 29,412$ 29,412$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
57 Rescue 11 Replacement 19,482$ 19,482$ 19,482$ 19,482$ 19,482$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
58 Tanker 12 Replacement 22,424$ 22,424$ 22,424$ 22,424$ 22,424$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
59 **Annual Contract - Exp 12/31/2022 77,000$ 77,000$ 77,000$ 77,000$ 77,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
60 Hamel Fire Sub-total 83,318$ 77,000$ 83,318$ 77,000$ 83,318$ 77,000$ 83,318$ 77,000$ 83,318$ 77,000$
61
62 Loretto & Long Lake
63 Fire (Loretto) - Exp 12/31/21 35,408$ 35,408$ 35,408$ 35,408$ 35,408$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
64 Fire (Long Lake) - Exp 12/31/2025 11,000$ 11,000$ 11,000$ 11,000$ 11,000$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
65 Fire Sub-total -$ 46,408$ -$46,408$ -$46,408$ -$46,408$ -$46,408$
66
67 Emergency Management
2023 - 2027 Capital Improvement Plan
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
10
Attachment J
2023 CIP: DEPARTMENT
Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Potential Revenue Source
2023 - 2027 Capital Improvement Plan
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
68 Siren Maintenance 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
69 Civil Defense Sirens 30,000$ 30,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund
70 Civil Defense Sub-total 7,500$ 7,500$ 37,500$ 37,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$
71
72
73 Administration/Data Processing
74 Vehicle Equipment Bonds/Cap Equip Fund
75 Administration Sub-total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
76
77 City Buildings
78 City Hall Repairs/Renovation 10,000$ 10,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund
79 Council Chambers PA/Amp System 60,000$ 60,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund
80 Community Building Repairs 15,000$ 15,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund
81 PW/Police Repairs/Renovations 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund
82 PW Entry Renovations/Training Room 250,000$ 250,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund
83 City Buildings - Parking Lot 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund
84 Future Fire District Buidling 12,000,000$ TBD Revolving Cap. Impr. Fund
85 City Building Sub-total 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 12,060,000$ 60,000$ 365,000$ 365,000$
86
87
88
89 Water (high growth expectation)
90 Water Treatment Plant Expansion 2,300,000$ 2,300,000$ Future - Water Capital
91 Morningside Watermain 1,980,000$ TBD Water Utility/Capital/Assessments/Grant
92 Tamarack/Hwy55 Watermain 500,000$ TBD Future - Water Capital
93 Water Tower (and land acquisition)2,600,000$ 2,600,000$ Future Water Cap (2020-2023)
94 Water Sub-total 2,300,000$ 2,300,000$ 1,980,000$ -$ 2,600,000$ 2,600,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$
95
96 Sewer
97 I / I Maintenance 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ Sewer Capital Fund
98 Sewer Vac 110,000$ 60,000$ Sewer Utility Fund
99 Willow Lift Station 850,000$ 850,000$ Sewer Capital Fund
100 Generator Replacements 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ Sewer Utility Fund
101 Hunter/Hamel Rd Upsize 750,000$ 750,000$ Sewer Capital Fund
102 Sewer Sub-total 1,060,000$ 1,010,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 850,000$ 850,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$
103
104 Storm Water
105 Painter's Creek/Morningside Ditch 300,000$ 75,000$ Storm Water Fund/Grants/MCWD
106 Storm Water Improvement Grant Match 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ Storm Water Fund/Grants/MCWD
107 Long Lake Creek 300,000$ 75,000$ Storm Water Fund/Grants/MCWD
108 Storm Water Sub-total 355,000$ 130,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 355,000$ 130,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$
109
110 Municipal Park Replacements
111 Trails
112 Annual Trail Replacement 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ Municipal Park Fund
113 Clydesdale Trail 86,000$ 86,000$ Municipal Park Fund
114 Hamel Legion Park
115 Holy Name Park
116 Hunter Lions Park
117 Full Park Reconstruction/Tennis Court 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ Municipal Park Fund/Grants/Donations
118 Lakeshore Park
119 Redesign/Shoreline Seeding 100,000$ 100,000$ Municipal Park Fund
120 Rainwater Nature Area
121 Maple Park Municipal Park Fund
122 New baseball backstop 25,000$ 25,000$
123 Walnut Park
124 Medina Morningside Park
125 Park Redesign/Update 100,000$ 100,000$ Municipal Park Fund
126 Replace baseball backstop & benches 15,000$ 15,000$ Municipal Park Fund
127 Parking Area Municipal Park Fund
128 Medina Lake Preserve
129 Tomann Preserve - Park Development
130 The Park at Fields of Medina
131 331,000$ 331,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 155,000$ 155,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$
132
133 New Park Development
134 Trails
135 Hackamore Trail 350,000$ 175,000$ Park Ded/Cost Share w/ Corcoran
136 Medina Road Trail 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ Park Dedication Fund
11
2023 CIP: DEPARTMENT
Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Project Cost
City Proposed
Portion Potential Revenue Source
2023 - 2027 Capital Improvement Plan
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
137 Chippewa Park Trail Connection 80,000$ 80,000$ Park Dedication Fund
138 Townline Road Trail 13,000$ 13,000$ Park Dedication Fund
139 Medina Lake Preserve
140 Clean-up/Development (woods)25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ Park Dedication Fund
141 Trail Head & Pavillion 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ Park Dedication Fund
142 Hamel Legion Park
143 Grand Stand at Paul Fortin Field 550,000$ -$ Hamel Athletic Club
144 Chippewa Park (Scherber Land)
145 Planning Design 35,000$ 35,000$ Park Dedication Fund
146 Nursery Stock 10,000$ 1,000$ Park Dedication Fund
147 Playground Equipment 750,000$ 750,000$ Park Dedication Fund
148 Shawnee Woods - Entrance Sign 5,000$ 5,000$ Park Dedication Fund
149 Park Land by Medina Golf & CC 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ Park Dedication Fund
150
Land Acquisitions / New Trails (rolling-used as
development occurs)Park Dedication Fund
151 Parks Sub-total 1,063,000$ 329,000$ 180,000$ 180,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
152
153 TOTAL:13,866,631$ 7,196,815$ 4,412,564$ 2,078,281$ 4,694,478$ 4,395,136$ 13,153,318$ 1,155,908$ 7,805,818$ 1,845,908$
12
Resolution No. 2022
December 6, 2022
Member ________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption.
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
RESOLUTION APPROVING 2023 FINAL TAX LEVY
Be it resolved, by the city council of the City of Medina, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the
following sums of money be levied for the current year, collectible in 2023, upon the taxable
property in the City of Medina, for the following purposes: To raise $5,090,500 as adequate
revenue for the general fund operating budget (of which $455,000 will be transferred to future fire
facility), $424,946 as adequate revenue for debt service, $312,500 for capital equipment, $61,000
for road fund and $112,000 for municipal parks.
General Fund: $5,090,500
Debt Service:
2012A G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds $ 364,791
2015A G.O. Improvement Bond $ 60,155
Municipal Parks $ 112,000
Road Fund $ 61,000
Capital Equipment $ 312,500
Total Levy: $6,000,946
The City Clerk, Caitlyn Walker, is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to
the county auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Dated: December 6, 2022.
______________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
_________________________________________
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _______
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2022-
December 6, 2022
Member __ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption.
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
RESOLUTION APPROVING 2023 FINAL BUDGET
Be it resolved by the city council of the City of Medina, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the
following sums of money be approved for the 2023 budget:
Expenditures/
Revenues & Expenses &
Other Sources Other Uses
General Fund $ 6,570,044 $ 6,570,044
Special Revenue Funds $ 210,500 $ 498,950
Capital Project Funds $ 3,098,996 $ 7,435,845
Debt Service Funds $ 776,149 $ 860,710
Water Fund $ 1,637,994 $ 2,308,871
Sanitary Sewer Fund $ 941,839 $ 986,823
Storm Water Fund $ 277,500 $ 416,667
Be it also resolved by the city council of the City of Medina, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that
the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) be approved for 2023:
2023 CIP $ 7,196,815
Dated: December 6, 2022.
____________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
________________________________________
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
_DesLauriers_ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
2023 COMPREHENSIVE
ANNUAL BUDGET
DECEMBER 6, 2022
KATHLEEN MARTIN
MAYOR
DINO DESLAURIERS
COUNCIL MEMBER
TODD ALBERS
COUNCIL MEMBER
ROBIN REID
COUNCIL MEMBER
JOE CAVANAUGH
COUNCIL MEMBER
SCOTT JOHNSON
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
ERIN BARNHART
FINANCE DIRECTOR
JASON NELSON
PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR
DUSTY FINKE
PLANNING DIRECTOR
STEVE SCHERER
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
CITY OF MEDINA
2023 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL BUDGET
Table of Contents
CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S BUDGET SUMMARY Page
Transmittal Letter.............................................................................................................1
GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY ................................................................ 5
Revenue Summary/Graph ................................................................................................6
Expenditure Summary .....................................................................................................7
Expenditure Summary by Department/Graph .................................................................8
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
Revenue Detail .................................................................................................................9
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
General Government
Overview ............................................................................................................10
Mayor and Council ............................................................................................11
Administration ...................................................................................................12
Elections .............................................................................................................14
Assessing............................................................................................................16
Planning and Zoning ..........................................................................................18
Comprehensive Plan ..........................................................................................19
Data Processing ..................................................................................................20
Police/Public Works Facility .............................................................................21
Municipal Building ............................................................................................22
Public Safety
Overview ............................................................................................................24
Police..................................................................................................................25
Police Records Management..............................................................................27
Fire .....................................................................................................................28
Building Inspections ..........................................................................................29
Emergency Management ...................................................................................31
Public Works ..................................................................................................................32
Sanitation and Recycling ...............................................................................................34
Parks and Recreation
Community Building .........................................................................................35
Parks ...................................................................................................................36
Economic Development Housing ..................................................................................38
CITY OF MEDINA
2023 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL BUDGET
Table of Contents Continued
General Fund Budget Summary.................................................................................... 39
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS BUDGETS .............................................................. 41
Environmental Fund.......................................................................................................42
Municipal Park Fund......................................................................................................43
Field House Operations Fund ........................................................................................44
Lawful Gambling ...........................................................................................................45
Police Forfeiture Fund ...................................................................................................46
Police Reserve Equipment Fund ....................................................................................47
German Liberal Cemetery Fund ....................................................................................48
Community Event Fund .................................................................................................49
Crime Prevention Fund ..................................................................................................50
Cable Franchise Fund ....................................................................................................51
Combined Special Revenue Funds Budgets ..................................................................52
CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS BUDGETS .............................................................. 55
Park Dedication Fund ....................................................................................................56
General Capital Improvement Fund...............................................................................57
Water Capital Improvement Fund .................................................................................58
Sewer Capital Improvement Fund .................................................................................59
Fire Facility Capital Fund ..............................................................................................60
Tax Increment 1-9 Fund.................................................................................................61
Equipment Replacement Fund .......................................................................................62
Road Improvement Fund ...............................................................................................63
Combined Capital Project Funds Budgets .....................................................................64
CITY OF MEDINA
2023 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL BUDGET
Table of Contents Continued
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS BUDGETS ...................................................................... 67
G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds 2020A (2012A) Fund (PW/PD Facility).........68
G.O. Refunding Bonds 2013A (PW/PD Facility) ..........................................................69
G.O. Improvement Bonds 2015A (Tower Drive) ..........................................................70
G.O. Refunding Bonds 2016A (TIF) .............................................................................71
G.O. Improvement Bonds 2020A (2017A) (Deer Hill) .................................................72
Combined Debt Service Funds Budgets ........................................................................74
PUBLIC UTILITY FUNDS BUDGETS ................................................................... 77
Water Utility Fund .........................................................................................................78
Sewer Utility Fund .........................................................................................................80
Storm Water Utility Fund ..............................................................................................82
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ...............................................................85
FEE SCHEDULE .........................................................................................................87
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Page 1 of 87
Mayor and City Council Members November 22, 2022
The City of Medina Staff is pleased to submit the 2023 proposed Comprehensive Annual Budget and
property tax levy for your consideration of final approval on December 6, 2022. This 2023 budget reflects
the Council’s property tax levy and budget discussions throughout 2022. When approved, this budget will
be the basis for the final 2023 property tax levy to be certified to Hennepin County in December 2022. The
County will then use the certified property tax levy for final 2023 property tax calculations.
Total taxable market value increased 19.3% from $2.016 billion in 2022 to $2.405 billion in 2023. Adjusted
net tax capacity increased 20.1% from $23.268 million in 2022 to $27.944 million in 2023.
The budget proposes a General Fund property tax levy increase of $942,900 for 2023, which maintains a
tax rate of 22.59% from 2022 to in 2023. The levy increase is due to general operations, new growth, tax
base expansion and funds dedicated to a future fire facility. Pre-existing debt service levies have increased
by $16,449. Capital levies for the Municipal Park Fund and Equipment Fund have no increase and a Road
Fund levy has been added in the amount of $61,000. The overall total levy increase for 2023 amounts to
$1,020,349.
Property Tax Levy: 2022 2023 Change
General Fund $4,147,600 $5,090,500 $942,900
Capital Equipment 312,500 312,500 0
Capital Road Fund $0 $61,000 $61,000
Municipal Park Fund 112,000 112,000 0
Road Improvement Debt Service 59,403 60,155 $752
Building Debt Service 349,094 364,791 $15,697
Total Levy $4,980,597 $6,000,946 $1,020,349
The General Fund Budget reflects the revenues and expenditures developed from the City’s service needs,
trend analysis, the annual goal setting session, joint work sessions with the City Council and Staff, and City
Council discussions. The expenditure levels are focused on maintaining the City’s current level of services
and to address capital, maintenance, or special project needs.
Page 2 of 87
GENERAL FUND REVENUES:
The total budgeted revenue for 2023 is $6,570,044 compared to the 2022 budget of $5,742,058. Of the
increase, $455,000 is tax revenue assigned to a future fire facility.
With the proposed general operating levy increase, property tax collections in the General Fund are
projected to increase from $4,147,600 in 2022 to $5,090,500 in 2023. As in prior years, the City continues
to receive the largest portion of the General Fund revenue from the property tax. In 2023, the tax levy will
provide approximately 77% of the City’s total General Fund revenues.
Licenses and Permits are estimated to remain steady. The budget is conservative regarding building permit
activity to account for slowing growth in the future. A large portion of building permit surplus can be
offset by building inspection liability that is not booked until year-end.
Budgeted transfers to the General Fund from the Water, Sewer, and Storm Water funds have increased
from $234,230 in 2022 to $286,257 in 2023.
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES:
General Fund expenditures are budgeted to increase from $5,742,058 in 2022 to $6,570,044 in 2023, of
this increase $455,000 is a transfer to the future fire facility fund. General government expenditures are
budgeted to increase $132,746 or 9.7%, largely due to staffing and wages. Public safety expenditures are
budgeted to increase $301,873 or 10.3%, due to staff wages and fire services. Parks and recreation
expenditures are budgeted to increase $25,014 and public works expenditures are budgeted to increase by
$45,537 or 5.6%. Capital replacement acquisitions will continue to be transacted through other funding
sources or reserves on an as needed or emergency basis only.
Personnel costs represent 55% of the General Fund Budget. A 5.0% cost of living adjustment (COLA) and
defined pay grade step (step) increases are included in the 2023 budget for qualifying employees.
OTHER FUND BUDGETS
In addition to the City’s General Fund Budget and proposed property tax levy, the City also has several
other Special Revenue, Capital Projects, Debt Service, and Enterprise fund budgets. While a profile and
proposed budget of each fund is included in this budget document, a summary of each fund’s key changes
should be noted to understand the impact on meeting future City service needs.
Community Event Fund: The City has depended on donations to fund the fireworks display at the annual
Medina Celebration Day event. Conduit bond revenue in the amount of $15,500 was received in 2019 to
be spread over five years. Additional donations will again be needed in 2023 to fund a fireworks contract
for the event. To assist in the event funding, a $4,000 transfer in from the General Fund is budgeted for
2023.
Municipal Park Fund: Park equipment has an asset/depreciation life between 10 and 40 years. Past
practice for park equipment replacement needs have been funded from the General Fund or Park
Page 3 of 87
Dedication Fund if classified as a capital improvement. The past need for park replacement has not
been great because the parks were new or newer. As the parks and park equipment within the City of
Medina approach asset life, there will be an increased need for replacement. The funds within the Park
Dedication Fund will not be enough to maintain a practice of funding replacements or improvements.
The 2040 Comprehensive Plan shows between $13.8 and $27.4 million in new parks and trails
development over the next 20 years. The Park Dedication Fund’s revenue source is 100% dependent
on development and developers and needs to set aside for future use. There have been past years and
will be again when no revenue comes in for Park Dedication. Thus, the reason there is importance in
establishing a constant revenue source for the Municipal Park Fund to handle replacements, which will
be ongoing while there are parks in use.
Water Utility: The City’s 2020 Water Rate Analysis demonstrated the need for a 1% rate increase in user
rates and no current increase in the trunk connection fees.
Sewer Utility: The City’s 2020 Sewer Rate Analysis includes a 1% rate increase in user rates and a decrease
in trunk connection fees because of the addition of an area charge for the Willow TH 55 lift station.
Storm Water Utility: A 3% increase in the Storm Water Utility rate has been included in the 2023 budget.
The storm water utility revenue supports administrative costs for annual reporting, pond maintenance, etc.
and will be used as matching funds for capital project completion. The CIP for storm water projects is
large and completion of the projects is highly contingent on receiving grant or cooperative funding from
other agencies and partners.
The remaining portions of this document provide greater detail on individual fund sources and uses
budgets. Supplemental information can be obtained from the Finance Department.
FINAL COMMENTS
This budget has been prepared based on the direction given by the City Council to date and the best
estimates of staff of the available revenues and the expenditures required to reasonably maintain core levels
of services without significantly compromising quality of life for Medina taxpayers.
Respectfully Submitted,
Erin Barnhart
Finance Director
Page 4 of 87
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Page 5 of 87
General Fund
The General Fund is the primary operating fund for the governmental operations of the City. Activities
enabled by General Fund planning include police protection and community support, fire prevention and
suppression, planning and zoning, street maintenance and repair, parks and recreation, sanitation and waste
removal, as well as engineering, legal and general administrative functions.
Page 6 of 87
General Fund Revenues and Other Financing Sources
By Type 2023
2023 Amount Percentage
2021 2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES BY TYPE
Property Tax Levy 3,731,800 4,147,600 5,090,500 942,900 22.7%
Other Taxes 75,000 85,000 75,000 (10,000) -11.8%
Licenses and Permits 391,269 492,500 509,400 16,900 3.4%
Intergovernmental 288,773 303,773 283,998 (19,775)-6.5%
Charges for Services 141,254 143,074 147,871 4,797 3.4%
Fines and Forfeitures 95,000 95,000 55,000 (40,000) -42.1%
Special Assessments 0 0 0 0 N/A
Miscellaneous 131,875 240,881 122,018 (118,863) -49.3%
Sale of Assets 0 0 0 0 N/A
Transfers In 227,409 234,230 286,257 52,027 22.2%
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 5,082,380 5,742,058 6,570,044 827,986 14.4%
Property Tax Levy
$5,090,500 78%
Other Taxes
$75,000
1%
Licenses and
Permits, $509,400
8%
Intergovernmental
$283,998 4%
Charges for Services
$147,871 2%
Fines and Forfeitures
$55,000 1%
Miscellaneous $122,018
2%
Transfers In $286,257
4%
Total $6,570,044
Page 7 of 87
General Fund Expenditures and Other Financing Uses
By Department 2023
2023 Amount Percentage
2021 2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
General Government:
Mayor & Council 25,544 25,544 25,544 (0) 0.0%
Administration 664,268 691,552 809,831 118,279 17.1%
Elections 15,400 24,617 24,692 75 0.3%
Assessing 104,316 172,500 172,500 0 0.0%
Planning & Zoning 191,094 206,624 213,116 6,492 3.1%
Comprehensive Plan 8,000 8,000 8,000 0 0.0%
Data Processing 90,704 101,000 104,000 3,000 3.0%
Police/Public Works Facility 81,500 87,800 89,300 1,500 1.7%
Municipal Building 58,800 56,400 59,800 3,400 6.0%
Unallocated 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total General Government 1,239,626 1,374,037 1,506,782 132,745 9.7%
Public Safety:
Police 1,849,789 2,023,300 2,253,577 230,277 11.4%
Police Records Management 13,500 14,200 10,250 (3,950) -27.8%
Fire 408,130 441,448 476,281 34,833 7.9%
Building Inspections 329,479 441,953 482,467 40,514 9.2%
Emergency Management 5,800 6,050 6,250 200 3.3%
Total Public Safety 2,606,698 2,926,951 3,228,824 301,873 10.3%
Public Works:
Public Works 741,356 793,620 840,377 46,757 5.9%
Sanitation & Recycling & Organics 26,539 25,322 24,103 (1,219) -4.8%
Total Public Works 767,895 818,942 864,479 45,537 5.6%
Parks & Recreation:
Community Building 42,076 40,035 43,526 3,491 8.7%
Parks 186,341 231,241 252,764 21,523 9.3%
Total Parks & Recreation 228,417 271,276 296,290 25,014 9.2%
Economic Development Housing
Housing 57,010 57,907 60,949 3,042 5.3%
Total Economic Development Housing 57,010 57,907 60,949 3,042 0
Transfers Out 4,000 147,174 112,718 (34,456) -23.4%
Transfer to Reserves 178,734 0 45,000 0
Transfer to Future Fire Facility 0 145,771 455,000 309,229 212.1%
Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses 5,082,380 5,742,058 6,570,044 782,985 13.6%
Page 8 of 87
General Fund Expenditures and Other Financing Uses
By Department 2023
General
Government,
$1,506,782 , 23%
Public Safety, $3,228,824 , 49%
Public Works,
$864,479 , 13%
Parks and
Recreation, $296,291 ,
5%
Economic
Development Housing, …
Transfers Out,
$612,718 , 9%
Total $6,570,044
Page 9 of 87
General Fund Revenues
PROFILE
Revenues for all General Fund operations, regardless of the department responsible for charging and
collecting them, are all listed jointly in the revenues section of the budget document. This includes all
revenues from property taxes to recreation charges for activities. The primary breakdowns for revenues in
the General Fund are:
Taxes
Special Assessments
Licenses and Permits
Intergovernmental Revenues
Charges for Services
Fines and Forfeitures
Miscellaneous Revenues
REVENUE DETAILS
Property Taxes
$ 5,090,500
These are the General Fund property taxes charged to all taxable properties in the City of Medina based on
the tax capacity of each property. The 2023 budget is 14.4% greater than the 2022 budget. Property Taxes
make up about 78% of the total revenues and other sources collected to provide General Fund services.
Licenses and Permits
$ 509,400
These are charges for items that state statutes have granted authority to issue and the fee amounts are
generally authorized on an annual basis within the City’s fee schedule. The City estimates these amounts
conservatively as these amounts can vary considerably from year to year. Types of fees included are liquor
and cigarette licenses, and building, plumbing, and hunting permits.
Charges for Services
$ 147,871
Cities may receive revenues for services provided. The main sources of revenue are from public safety
services and community room rentals. Other charges include election filing fees, sales of maps and copies,
and assessment searches.
These three revenue sources, property taxes, licenses and permits, and charges for services, together make
up approximately 88% of the City’s general operating revenues and other sources. The balance comes
from fines and forfeitures, intergovernmental activity, and operating transfers.
Page 10 of 87
General Fund Expenditures
GENERAL GOVERNMENT OVERVIEW
PROFILE
The General Fund General Government consists of City Council, Administration, Elections, Assessing,
Planning & Zoning, Comprehensive Plan, Data Processing, and Municipal Buildings.
2023 General Government Expenditures
2023 Amount Percentage
2021 2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
General Government:
Mayor & Council 25,544 25,544 25,544 (0)0.0%
Administration 664,268 691,552 809,831 118,279 17.1%
Elections 15,400 24,617 24,692 75 0.3%
Assessing 104,316 172,500 172,500 0 0.0%
Planning & Zoning 191,094 206,624 213,116 6,492 3.1%
Comprehensive Plan 8,000 8,000 8,000 0 0.0%
Data Processing 90,704 101,000 104,000 3,000 3.0%
Police/Public Works Facility 81,500 87,800 89,300 1,500 1.7%
Municipal Building 58,800 56,400 59,800 3,400 6.0%
Unallocated 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total General Government 1,239,626 1,374,037 1,506,782 132,745 9.7%
Page 11 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
GENERAL GOVERNMENT – MAYOR AND COUNCIL
PROFILE
The City Council is comprised of the Mayor and four Council Members. All are elected at large. Under
the City’s Council-Administrator form of government, the City Council exercises the legislative authority
of the City. The City Council is responsible for formulating City policy, enacting legislation, adopting the
annual budget, levying local property taxes, and appointing members to advisory boards and commissions.
Members of the City Council also constitute the Board of Appeal and Equalization, and the Canvassing
Board for municipal elections.
The City Council budget includes expenditures related to compensation, memberships, subscriptions and
training of its members. Printing expenditures are also included for the Truth in Taxation flier inserted
with the County’s proposed tax statements.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVELS
2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Mayor 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Council Members 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
STAFFING HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY
• Medina is a Statutory A form of government.
• All Council members are at large.
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
None requested.
2023 Amount Percentage
2021 2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
Mayor and Council
Total Personnel Services 17,494 17,494 17,494 (0)0.0%
Total Other Services and Charges 8,050 8,050 8,050 0 0.0%
Total Mayor and Council 25,544 25,544 25,544 (0)0.0%
Page 12 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
GENERAL GOVERNMENT – ADMINISTRATION
PROFILE
The City Administrator is the Chief Administrative Officer of the City. It is the Administrator’s duty to properly
administer all affairs relating to the City. The Administrator provides management of the City to ensure that all
City Council policies and directives are carried out. Activities include coordinating recommendations to the City
Council on financial, legislative, and management issues and to serve as a liaison between the Council, advisory
boards and commissions, consultants, other levels of government, the media, and the public.
The Administration budget includes expenditures related to general administration, human resources management,
information technology, legal, contract management, statutorily required clerk services and financial management
including: budgeting, debt management, investments, vendor check processing, special assessments, public
improvement financing, and risk management.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL
2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
City Administrator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant City
Administrator/City Clerk 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Assistant to City
Administrator/City Clerk 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Administrative Assistant 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Administration Intern
Finance Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Asst. Finance Director 1.00
Accountant I 1.00 1.00
Accountant II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accounting Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accounting Part-Time 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Total FTE's 5.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.80 4.80 5.22 5.18
STAFFING HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY
• In 2006, a Finance Director position was added to bring financial functions in house from the consultants and
previously assigned to the City Administrator. The position created investment strategies to provide cash flow
and conserving capital, while maximizing investment income revenue.
• In 2007, an Accountant was added to handle utility billing and the processing of development reimbursable
items, as well as to improve segregation of accounting and finance duties, assist in enhancing the accuracy of
financial reporting, and to meet the demands of City growth. This position also provided support for the
additional 250 utility accounts added through new development.
Page 13 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
GENERAL GOVERNMENT – ADMINISTRATION (continued)
• In 2008, the position of Assistant to the City Administrator was reassigned from an Administrative Assistant
position to assume all statutory clerk functions (as Deputy Clerk), duties in human resource management,
elections, public relations, information technology, contract management and liaison to parks and the
community building previously held by the City Administrator.
• In 2008, an Accounting Technician position was created to replace the retiring Deputy Clerk. The position also
provided resources for the newly created Storm Water Utility which added an additional 2,500 accounts, as well
as monthly utility billing in 2009.
• In 2012, an Assistant Finance Director position was created to replace the Accountant position as well as to
cover added responsibilities acquired due to a vacant Finance Director position in interim status with a
contracted consultant.
• In 2015, the Finance Director position was filled eliminating the Assistant Finance Director position and
reducing consultant hours. Additionally, a half-time Accountant position was filled.
• In 2016, the budget includes the reassignment of the position Assistant to the Administrator to Assistant
Administrator/City Clerk.
• In 2018, the budget includes the reassignment of the Accounting Technician position to Accountant II.
• In 2019, a part-time administrative assistant position was created to be shared between admin and finance,
replacing the vacant PT Finance Clerk position. Assistant City Administrator position was approved pay grade
increase from 5-6 to 7-8.
• In 2021, the Asst. City Administrator/City Clerk position became vacant and was reallocated to Asst. to City
Administrator/City Clerk and decreased to pay grade 5-6.
• In 2022, full-time Accounting Technician position posted to be filled in 2023. Position to handle billing, water
meter replacement program and cross-train for additional backup.
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
None requested.
2023 Amount Percentage
2021 2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
Administration
Total Personnel Services 545,938 568,502 681,881 113,379 19.9%
Total Supplies 5,100 5,100 5,300 200 3.9%
Total Other Services and Charges 113,230 117,950 122,650 4,700 4.0%
Total Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Administration 664,268 691,552 809,831 118,279 17.1%
Page 14 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
GENERAL GOVERNMENT - ELECTIONS
PROFILE
The City Clerk’s Office is responsible for administration of elections, including supervision of elections
and voter registration. The Clerk’s Office ensures elections are handled in accordance with State, Federal,
and County regulations. The Clerk’s Office oversees all activities related to City elections including
notices, materials, and certification of process. Additionally, the Clerk’s Office arranges polling places
and sets up voting equipment. The Clerk’s Office also supervises the recruiting and training of election
coordinators and judges and oversees the maintenance of voter registration files.
Section 200 of the Medina City Code provides for regular municipal elections to be held in even-numbered
years only.
STAFFING HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY
• Although internal staff provides a service to this department every year and significantly during an
election year, no time is allocated due to the fluctuation in activity during off election years. The
General Administration budget contains the staffing resources to conduct the City’s elections.
• In 2006, City Staff restructured the flow of the election coordination by increasing internal staff
administration and decreasing part-time hiring by 30%.
• In 2008, the City established a second precinct, which led to additional hiring of part-time election
staffing.
• In 2010, City Staff enacted additional efficiencies in election coordination and shifts to reduce part-
time hiring.
• In 2012 additional shift hours were added for an additional absentee precinct at the primary and general
election. This was also a presidential election and required more staffing.
• In 2014 two part-time election judges were hired to administer absentee voting.
• 2015 was a non-election year. Shift staffing was not necessary.
• 2016 one full-time election judge was hired to administer absentee voting along with staff. Presidential
election and no excuse absentee voting implemented. Additional election judges for office help will
be needed for future presidential elections.
• 2017 was a non-election year.
• In 2018, two full-time election judges were hired to assist in absentee voting.
• In 2020, two primary elections and one general election were held. All elections had absentee voting
and required election judges at City Hall.
• In 2022, one full-time election judge was hired to assist in early voting for the primary election. One
part-time election judge assisted with early voting for the general election.
Page 15 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
GENERAL GOVERNMENT – ELECTIONS (continued)
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
None requested.
2023 Amount Percentage
2021 2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
Elections
Total Personnel Services 8,550 11,842 11,842 (1)0.0%
Total Supplies 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0.0%
Total Other Services and Charges 5,850 11,775 11,850 75 0.6%
Total Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Elections 15,400 24,617 24,692 75 0.3%
Page 16 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
GENERAL GOVERNMENT - ASSESSING
PROFILE
The primary function of the City’s Assessing services is to provide the accurate classification and valuation
of all real, personal and exempt property, including the value of all improvements and structures thereon,
located within Medina at maximum intervals of five years. In addition, the Assessor maintains a data base
and affiliated files, including property characteristics and photographs on all parcels, provides
computerized reports and responds to requests of the Minnesota Department of Revenue, Hennepin County,
City departments and members of the general public.
The City Assessor also attends and coordinates the City’s Local Board of Appeal and Equalization hearing,
commonly held in April each year and provides valuation information to the City to determine park
dedication fees when properties subdivide.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL AND STAFFING HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY
The City continues to utilize contracted assessing services. On a regular basis, the City receives competitive
quotes for this service. The contract services the City engages in are more economically feasible than hiring
full-time staff. The City currently contracts with Rolf Erickson Enterprises Inc. South West Assessing for
residential assessing services. In 2021, the City contracted with Hennepin County for commercial,
industrial and apartment assessing services. No staffing is allocated to this department.
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
None requested.
2023 Amount Percentage
2021 2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
Assessing
Total Supplies 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Other Services and Charges 104,316 172,500 172,500 0 0.0%
Total Assessing 104,316 172,500 172,500 0 0.0%
Page 17 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
GENERAL GOVERNMENT – PLANNING AND ZONING
PROFILE
The Planning and Zoning department is primarily responsible for the drafting and enforcement of the City’s zoning and
subdivision ordinances (Chapter 8) and for coordinating the Comprehensive Plan. The department has considerable
contact with various members of the public on matters related to property in the City including residents, business
owners, contractors and builders, potential buyers, developers, realtors, appraisers, flood insurance agents, and other
similar persons.
The department manages the review process of all land use and development applications including: subdivisions, site
plan reviews, planned unit developments, conditional use permits, rezoning, variances, and other appeals. This process
includes meeting with potential applicants prior to an application, reviewing requests for consistency with City
regulations, preparing memoranda to assist the City officials, and drafting resolutions and ordinances. The department
also coordinates the development process after a project is approved, which entails drafting documents such as
easements and development agreements and verifying that all terms and conditions applied to a project are followed.
Assistance is provided to the Planning Commission, including supplying monthly information packets, maintenance of
Commission meeting agendas and minutes, and distribution of public hearing notices.
Geographical Information System (GIS) and mapping services for all City departments are provided by this department.
This includes obtaining and maintaining relevant data and creating maps and providing spatial analysis when requested.
The department inspects for compliance with zoning and nuisance regulations and carries through with enforcement
activities when necessary. This includes unlicensed/inoperable vehicles and property maintenance, and property
manure management practices.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL
2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Planning Director 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70
City Planner 0.70 0.75
Associate Planner 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Planning Assistant 0.12 0.12 0.30 0.35
Administrative Assistant 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12
Part Time Help
Total FTE's 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.22
STAFFING HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY
• In 2004, the City created the position of full-time City Planner, as opposed to utilizing only outside consultants to
meet the demands of the City’s growth and land use applications.
• In 2008, the department was restructured to provide or enhance professional planning and zoning services in the
areas of land-use review, building permit review, ordinance revisions, use of GIS, as well as code and septic
enforcement.
• In 2016, the City Planner was reassigned as Planning Director and the Planning Assistant was budgeted and
reassigned at Associate Planner.
Page 18 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
GENERAL GOVERNMENT – PLANNING AND ZONING (continued)
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
None requested.
2023 Amount Percentage
2021 2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
Planning and Zoning
Total Personnel Services 144,044 153,574 167,366 13,792 9.0%
Total Supplies 750 750 450 (300) -40.0%
Total Other Services and Charges 46,300 52,300 45,300 (7,000) -13.4%
Total Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Planning and Zoning 191,094 206,624 213,116 6,492 3.1%
Page 19 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
GENERAL GOVERNMENT – COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PROFILE
The City’s Comprehensive Plan is updated every ten years and establishes the vision and sets the course
for the City looking out two decades to guide future residential growth, economic development, and
investments in City services such as natural resources, parks, recreation, transportation, and water
resources. The 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan was completed in September 2018. $8,000 is assigned
each year within General Fund reserves to account for total project cost every ten years.
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
N/A
2023 Amount Percentage
2021 2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
Comprehensive Plan
Total Other Services and Charges 8,000 8,000 8,000 0 0.0%
Total Comprehensive Plan 8,000 8,000 8,000 0 0.0%
Page 20 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
GENERAL GOVERNMENT – DATA PROCESSING
PROFILE
The main function for Data Processing is information technology (IT). This covers annual licensing fees
and web-based programs, as well as copier/printer leases. Also included are maintenance costs for
workstations and servers necessary to maintain the City’s electronic records and management. In 2014
video recording and editing of City Council meetings was implemented. In 2017 transition to the cloud
was implemented reducing the need for servers. In 2021, contracted services with Cipher Laboratories was
terminated and replaced with Solution Builders.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL AND STAFFING HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY
This service is provided on a contractual basis. No staffing is allocated directly to this department and
staff coordination is budgeted from the General Administration budget.
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
None requested.
2023 Amount Percentage
2021 2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
Data Processing
Total Supplies 70,954 73,500 76,500 3,000 4.1%
Total Other Services and Charges 19,750 27,500 27,500 0 0.0%
Total Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Data Processing 90,704 101,000 104,000 3,000 3.0%
Page 21 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
GENERAL GOVERNMENT – POLICE/PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY
PROFILE
The former Clam Corp building at 600 Clydesdale Trail was obtained in 2012 and improved in 2013 for
use as the Medina police/public works facility. The Police/Public Works Facility department provides for
the ongoing cleaning, maintenance and repair of the building. Public Works and Police departments
contract or perform all maintenance on building and/or equipment.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL
The personnel from the Public Works and Police departments provide these services within the scope of
their existing duties.
STAFFING HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY
The Public Works and Police departments are responsible for these activities.
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
See the General Capital Improvement Fund.
2023 Amount Percentage
2021 2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
Police/Public Works Facility
Total Supplies 2,000 2,500 2,500 0 0.0%
Total Other Services and Charges 79,500 85,300 86,800 1,500 1.8%
Total Police/Public Works Facility 81,500 87,800 89,300 1,500 1.7%
Page 22 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
GENERAL GOVERNMENT – MUNICIPAL BUILDING
PROFILE
The Municipal Building function provides for the ongoing cleaning, maintenance and repair of government
buildings including City Hall. Other facilities, such as Hamel Community Building, Field House, and
Hamel Water Treatment Plant have expenditures charged directly to their respective departments. Public
Works contracts or performs all maintenance on building and/or equipment, as well as mowing, work on
garden beds, heating/cooling, plumbing, painting, parking lot, electrical, and water softener upkeep.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL
The personnel from the Public Works department provide these services within the scope of their existing
duties.
STAFFING HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY
The Public Works Department is responsible for these activities with minor contracting and maintenance
contracts used for specific items. The Administration Department provides contract management for the
various service contracts to these areas.
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
See the General Capital Improvement Fund.
2023 Amount Percentage
2021 2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
Municipal Building
Total Supplies 2,800 2,800 2,800 0 0.0%
Total Other Services and Charges 56,000 53,600 57,000 3,400 6.3%
Total Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Municipal Building 58,800 56,400 59,800 3,400 6.0%
Page 23 of 87
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Page 24 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
PUBLIC SAFETY OVERVIEW
PROFILE
The General Fund Public Safety departments include Police Services, Police Records Management, Fire
Services, Building Inspections, and Emergency Management activities. These categories relate directly to
making the City of Medina a safe place to live and work. These services are necessary to address mandated
requirements by State and Federal laws. It is the responsibility of the local unit of government to protect
their citizens and property.
2023 Public Safety Expenditures
2023 Amount Percentage
2021 2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
Public Safety:
Police 1,849,789 2,023,300 2,253,577 230,277 11.4%
Police Records Management 13,500 14,200 10,250 (3,950) -27.8%
Fire 408,130 441,448 476,281 34,833 7.9%
Building Inspections 329,479 441,953 482,467 40,514 9.2%
Emergency Management 5,800 6,050 6,250 200 3.3%
Total Public Safety 2,606,698 2,926,951 3,228,824 301,873 10.3%
Page 25 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
PUBLIC SAFETY – POLICE
PROFILE
The Police Department provides for police administration, public safety services, investigation, and patrol. The
Public Safety Director provides leadership and management oversight by coordinating and administrating all
divisions within the department. The Public Safety Director is responsible for overseeing multiple strategies by
ensuring accountability and allocating resources. Sworn, uniformed officers respond to calls-for-service of both
emergency and non-emergency nature. In addition, police services conduct proactive patrol in residential and
commercial areas to deter crime and increase traffic safety. Officers seek to make a positive difference in the
lives of the residents of Medina and the community. Community Service Officers are utilized to perform police-
related duties that do not require a sworn police officer. The investigative process includes, but is not limited
to, carrying out interviews and interrogations, recording and witnessing formal statements, conducting line-ups,
performing surveillance, gathering and processing evidence, reviewing and analyzing the data gathered, writing
and serving search warrants, and disseminating information to fellow officers within the department and agencies
outside the police department.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL
2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Public Safety Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sergeant 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Investigator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Officers 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00
CSOs 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
Administrative Assistant 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Transcriptionist 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Overtime 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57
Total FTE's 15.57 14.57 14.57 14.07 13.57 12.82 12.82 12.82 12.82 12.82
STAFFING HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY
• Medina began providing contractual police services to Loretto from the date of inception.
• In 1998, scheduling was structured to provide response to all emergencies, 24 hours a day, seven days a
week, 365 days a year.
• In 2003, the drug task force was formed, and a position was designated to address drug related issues. In
2005, that position was backfilled for general patrol duties.
• In 2004, the Sergeant position was created to increase the supervision and accountability of the patrol
division and to work on investigations.
• In 2007, an Investigator was added to do all in house investigations.
• In 2007, a part-time Transcriptionist was added to increase efficiencies within the department.
• In 2013, the Police Chief position was elevated to the Public Safety Director position.
Page 26 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
PUBLIC SAFETY – STAFFING HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY (continued)
• In 2019, Police Sergeant was promoted to Public Safety Directed; effective March 2020. Addition of full-
time officer was approved; effective 2020. Part-time transcriptionist position was removed from the budget;
effective 2020.
• In 2021, a part-time Administrative Assistant was added for backup.
• In 2022, a second sergeant position was budgeted for 2023.
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
See the Equipment Replacement Fund, Police Forfeiture Fund, and Police Reserve Equipment Fund.
Page 27 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
PUBLIC SAFETY – POLICE RECORDS MANAGEMENT
PROFILE
This function was established to capture the ongoing expenditures created by the City’s records
management system.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL
The personnel from the Police department provide these services within the scope of their existing duties.
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
None requested.
Page 28 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
PUBLIC SAFETY – FIRE
PROFILE
The purpose of fire protection is to respond to fire, medical emergencies, water rescues and chemical
spills/hazards within the City in a timely and efficient manner to minimize the loss sustained by citizens
and/or businesses in the City. The fire services budget also provides public education in fire prevention,
fire safety awareness, and fire extinguisher training.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL
This service is provided on a contractual basis. No staffing is allocated to this department. The
Administration Department provides contract management for the service contracts and the coordination
is provided by the Police Department.
In 2020, a fire study was completed to determine benefits of a regional fire district or municipal fire
department. Planning and implementation are projected to continue. In 2021, the Maple Plain Fire
contract was renegotiated and set for a one-year term.
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
See the Equipment Replacement Fund.
Page 29 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
PUBLIC SAFETY – BUILDING INSPECTIONS
PROFILE
The Building Inspection division provides services for all building permit related activities in the City.
This includes permits for new construction, additions, alterations and remodels, mechanical, plumbing, and
septic systems. This also includes reviewing plans for consistency with relevant codes prior to construction
beginning, and on-site inspections during and after construction. The function also maintains address files
with past permit information and completes various state-required reports.
The division is also responsible for the review and inspection of other types of permits including permanent
and temporary sign permits, driveway/curb cut permits and sewer/water hookup permits.
The division provides bi-annual fire inspections of all commercial properties in the City. Such inspections
include proper material storage, fire suppression devices, emergency exiting and fire lane circulation.
This division coordinates the City’s septic system monitoring program. This program requires property
owners on individual sewage treatment systems to have their systems pumped and inspected by a private
licensed contractor a minimum of once every three years.
This division also provides inspections for construction site erosion and sediment control measures to
protect water quality and is responsible for regulation and enforcement related to wetlands within the City.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL
2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Planning Director 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
City Planner 0.30 0.25
Associate Planner 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70
Planning Assistant 0.88 0.88 0.70 0.65
PW Inspector 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
Administrative Assistant 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23
Intern 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
Total FTE's 2.39 2.39 1.74 1.74 1.74 1.74 1.68 1.68 1.68 1.58
STAFFING HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY
• The City utilizes contract services for most plan review inspection activities.
• In 2009, staff was allocated to provide zoning plan reviews for structure setbacks, hardcover, and
landscaping. In-house staff also provides administrative support and coordinates financial and
statistical reporting.
• In 2010, more accurate allocation of the Administrative Assistant, who provides phone and counter
services relating to building inspections, was implemented.
Page 30 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
PUBLIC SAFETY – BUILDING INSPECTIONS (Continued)
• In 2016, the City Planner was reassigned as Planning Director and the Planning Assistant was
budgeted and reassigned at Associate Planner.
• In 2018, the budget for Public Works Inspector was moved from Public Works to Building
Inspections.
• In 2021, the Administrative Assistant shared between the Public Works and Planning/Building department was
allocated to full-time Public Works. A full-time Planning and Building Assistant position was posted to be filled
in 2022.
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
None requested.
Page 31 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
PUBLIC SAFETY – EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
PROFILE
The purpose of the Emergency Management function is to ensure the effective coordinated use of resources
to: 1) maximize the protection of life and property, 2) ensure the continuity of government, 3) sustain
survivors and 4) repair essential facilities and utilities in the event of a disaster, whether natural or
manmade. Emergency Management is headed by the Public Safety Director. The City’s emergency plan
is reviewed annually, and continual training is conducted in accordance with City Ordinance 206.
In 2020, the Emergency Management fund was used to monitor all COVID-19 related expenditures that
were reimbursable from CARES ACT funds. This fund will continue to monitor COVID-19 expenditures
as well as all expenditures reimbursable from ARPA funds if applicable.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL
The personnel from the Police department provide these services within the scope of their existing duties.
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
See the General Capital Improvement Fund.
Page 32 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
PUBLIC WORKS
PROFILE
Public Works provides maintenance of all City streets, sidewalks and trails, which includes patching, seal
coating, crack sealing, sweeping, striping, mowing ditches, shouldering, grading, drainage issues, paving and
minor sidewalk and curb repair. Also included are snow and ice control on roads, trails and parking lots, which
are provided in a safe and cost-effective manner while balancing personnel resources and environmental
concerns, as well as servicing all trucks and equipment used. Public Works also provides traffic control,
maintenance, replacement and inventory of signage, pavement markings, and street and signal lights. The
department also maintains a compost and brush pile that can be utilized by the residents year-round.
Public Works is on call 24/7 for all emergencies that may arise. Compliance with safety regulations is provided
by the department, including training seminars and testing to maintain the various licensing requirements, and
yearly safety training to meet OSHA requirements.
The Public Works Department provides budgeting, pavement management, road material bids, contracting with
low bidders, and overseeing all road projects each year, as well as other smaller projects. Public Works is also
involved in the set up, and tear down, and post clean-up of Clean-up Day and Medina Celebration Day.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL
2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
PW Director 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
PW Foreman 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Administrative Assistant 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
Street Maintenance/Inspector 0.43 0.43 0.49 0.43 0.49 0.43 0.49 0.43 0.49 0.43
PW Maintenance 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
PW Maintenance 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
PW Maintenance 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.45 0.50
PW On-call 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Winter Temp 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Part Time Help 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.30
Total FTE's 2.96 2.96 2.86 2.86 2.61 2.61 2.42 2.67 2.72 2.52
Page 33 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
PUBLIC WORKS (continued)
STAFFING HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY
• In 2006, the Public Works Superintendent duties were redefined following retirement of the Public Works
Director, which allowed for a higher level of administration and supervision.
• In 2007, a Foreman position was created to manage the day-to-day oversight of the employees working in the
field. An On-Call policy was also adopted to compensate staff available for dispatch after hours.
• In 2009 & 2010, the department delayed the replacement of the retiring Equipment Operator. Part-time
staffing was utilized for seasonal projects such as snow plowing and street maintenance.
• In 2011, the Street Maintenance position was written to include inspections.
• In 2012, the Public Works Superintendent title was changed to Public Works Director and the Administrative
Assistant title was changed to Office Assistant.
• In 2014, a winter temporary position was added, which will become a full-time Public Works Maintenance
position in 2015, allocated 50% to public works and 50% to parks.
• In 2018, the inspections position was budgeted to Building Inspections and removed from Public Works
Budget.
• In 2020, winter seasonal help was added to assist in snow plowing.
• In 2021, the Administrative Assistant shared between the Public Works and Planning/Building department
was allocated to full-time Public Works. A full-time Planning and Building Assistant position was posted to
be filled in 2022.
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
See the Equipment Replacement Fund and Road Improvement Fund.
Page 34 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
SANITATION AND RECYCLING
PROFILE
Sanitation and recycling is responsible for the administration of the City’s recycling and organic
activities as well as refuse hauling.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL
2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Assistant City
Administrator/City Clerk 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Assistant to City
Administrator/City Clerk 0.10 0.10
Deputy Clerk 0.10
Total FTE's 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
STAFFING HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY
• In 2009, the City took on duties previously provided by a contracted Recycling Coordinator.
• In 2016, the budget includes the reassignment of the position Assistant to the Administrator to
Assistant Administrator/City Clerk.
• In 2021, the Asst. City Administrator/City Clerk position became vacant and was reallocated to Asst. to City
Administrator/City Clerk and decreased to pay grade 5-6.
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
None requested.
Page 35 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
COMMUNITY BUILDING
PROFILE
The Hamel Community Building is available to be rented for various private functions. The Community
Building department provides for the ongoing cleaning, maintenance and repair of the Hamel Community
Building.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL
Services are provided on a contractual basis.
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
See the General Capital Improvement Fund.
Page 36 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
PARKS
PROFILE
This department represents the consolidation of all park maintenance operating functions. Activities within
this department include maintenance and repair of playground equipment, installation and upkeep of park
signage, repairs and snow removal on parking lots, dock installation and repairs, park shelter buildings,
picnic shelters, irrigation systems, bleachers, benches, restroom and dumpster enclosures to ensure safe,
clean and accessible park buildings and equipment. In addition, this department provides basic park turf
maintenance including mowing, fertilizing, weed control, and seeding and aerating. It also provides
miscellaneous grounds maintenance such as streetscape and flower maintenance, rain garden maintenance,
as well as garbage collection and picking up litter. Other responsibilities include maintenance activities
for athletic fields, tennis courts, basketball courts, and ice-skating rinks.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL
2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
PW Director 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
PW Foreman 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Administrative Assistant 0.20 0.20
Assistant City
Administrator/City Clerk 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Assistant to City
Administrator/Deputy
Clerk 0.05 0.05
Street Maintenance/Inspector 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
PW Maintenance 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
PW Maintenance 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
PW Maintenance 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.50
Part Time Help 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Total FTE's 1.25 1.25 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 0.85 1.00 0.50
STAFFING HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY
• The staffing structure of the department has been modified since 2006 to reflect the time spent by Public
Works staff and administrative support for park functions.
• In 2017, a part-time parks position was added.
Page 37 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
PARKS AND RECREATION (continued)
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
See the Park Dedication Fund & Municipal Park Fund.
Page 38 of 87
General Fund Expenditures (Continued)
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT HOUSING
PROFILE
This department created in 2020 was derived to budget funds for the City to continue to participate in the
Livable Communities Act (LCA), a program administered by the Metropolitan Council offering grants to
participating cities to support development of affordable and life-cycle housing. The City elected to take
part in the LCA in 1996 and to continue in 2010. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan also notes that the City
participates in LCA Communities which participate in the LCA are required to expend a certain amount
annually to help create, sustain, preserve, or advance affordable and/or life-cycle housing opportunities
(ALHOA). The City is required to report annually whether at least 85% of the annual amount
(determined by Metropolitan Council) is expended each year. If the City does not expend 85% of the
ALHOA, the City does not qualify for any grants within the LCA. Current funding source is antenna
revenue.
OPERATING BUDGET
CAPITAL OUTLAY
None requested.
Page 39 of 87
GENERAL FUND BUDGET
Page 40 of 87
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Page 41 of 87
Special Revenue Funds
Special Revenue Funds are categorized by the specific nature of the source of revenues. Grant and donation
funds given for a specific purpose are accounted for as Special Revenue Funds. The Special Revenue
Funds for the City of Medina are:
Environmental Fund
Municipal Park Fund
Field House Operations Fund
Charitable Gambling
Police Forfeiture Fund
Police Reserve Equipment Fund
German Liberal Cemetery Fund
Community Event Fund
Cable Franchise Fund
Page 42 of 87
Special Revenue Funds
ENVIRONMENTAL FUND
PROFILE
The Medina Environmental Fund’s primary function is to provide for securing land for conservation of
natural resources, for parks and open space, and for trails, including partnerships with other agencies on
grant applications; secondary uses include: 1) Incentivizing residents to improve storm water run-off
management through voluntary installation of rain gardens and other measures in order to benefit the health
of lakes and streams; 2) Establishing a program for the installation of curb cuts for interested residents who
wish to install rain gardens; 3) Partnering with Storm Water Utility Funds or grant resources to accomplish
water improvement projects; 4) Lending funds to landowners to complete wetland mitigation projects that
will be repaid to the City when the landowner receives compensation for the mitigation; 5) Implementing
Low Impact Development or other sustainable initiatives in City projects; 6) Removing sick and diseased
boulevard trees on city land and replacing them; and, 7) Subsidizing the cost of tree stock made available
to residents on City Clean Up Day.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Miscellaneous 59,674 0 (59,674) -100.0%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Other Services and Charges 69,885 31,000 (38,885) -55.6%
Capital Outlay 0 0 0 N/A
Transfers Out 0 0 0 N/A
Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 69,885 31,000 (38,885) -55.6%
Net Change in Fund Balance (10,211) (31,000) (20,789) 203.6%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 487,281 477,070
Fund Balance, End of Year 477,070 446,070
Page 43 of 87
Special Revenue Funds (Continued)
MUNICIPAL PARK FUND
PROFILE
The Municipal Park Fund is to be used by the City Council as they see the need for park projects and
maintenance outside of expenditures within the General Fund and Park Dedication Fund. Municipal Park
Fund projects are primarily the replacement of existing park equipment and structures that do not qualify
for the Park Dedication Fund. Projects and replacements are presented through the Capital Improvement
Plan. Revenues are generated by taxes, antenna revenue, grants and donations from individuals, businesses
and organizations.
In 2019, discussions and planning took place amongst staff, City Council, Park Commission and
community outreach to establish a 30-year replacement plan. A levy implementation was passed for 2020
and onward to fund ongoing replacements.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Property Taxes 58,104 112,000 53,896 92.8%
Miscellaneous 44,404 0 (44,404) -100.0%
Transfers In 0 0 0 N/A
Total Revenues and Other Financing Uses 102,509 112,000 9,491 (0)
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Capital Outlay 131,695 331,000 199,306 151.3%
Net Change in Fund Balance (29,186) (219,000) (189,814) 650.4%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 426,721 397,536
Fund Balance, End of Year 397,536 178,536
Page 44 of 87
Special Revenue Funds (Continued)
FIELD HOUSE OPERATIONS FUND
PROFILE
The Field House Operations Fund was established at the end of 2009 with a donation to assist in operating
costs related to the opening of the field house at Hamel Legion Park. The donation was part of the
contributions for the construction of the field house.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Miscellaneous 2,658 1,000 (1,658) -62.4%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Personal Services 0 0 0 N/A
Supplies 440 900 460 104.6%
Other Services and Charges 2,196 4,100 1,904 86.7%
Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 2,636 5,000 2,364 89.7%
Net Change in Fund Balance 23 (4,000) (4,023) -17697.9%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 4,618 4,641
Fund Balance, End of Year 4,641 641
Page 45 of 87
Special Revenue Funds (Continued)
CHARITABLE GAMBLING FUND
PROFILE
The Charitable Gambling Fund was established in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 349.213(f)(2). The statute
gives the City of Medina local authority to require organizations with premises permits to conduct lawful
gambling to make specific expenditures of no more than 10% of the net profit. The Gambling and Control
Board has an authorized list of approved expenditure uses for all revenue received from lawful gambling
donations.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Miscellaneous 21,103 0 (21,103) -100.0%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Other Services and Charges 0 0 0 N/A
Capital Outlay 0 0 0 N/A
Transfers Out 0 0 0 N/A
Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 0 0 0 N/A
Net Change in Fund Balance 21,103 0 (21,103) -100.0%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 7,263 28,366
Fund Balance, End of Year 28,366 28,366
Page 46 of 87
Special Revenue Funds (Continued)
POLICE FORFEITURE FUND
PROFILE
The Police Forfeiture Fund was established to account for receipts and disbursements related to forfeited
vehicles, equipment and cash from drug, DWI, and other crime related cases. Expenditures are restricted
by law to be used for drug and DWI enforcement. In 2018, due to law changes, forfeiture revenues and
federal drug revenues have ceased or decreased significantly.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Fines and Forfeitures 7,904 20,000 12,096 153.0%
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 N/A
Sale of Assets 0 0 0 N/A
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 7,904 20,000 12,096 153.0%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Personal Services 5 0 (5) -100.0%
Supplies 1,512 0 (1,512) -100.0%
Other Services and Charges 0 40,000 40,000 N/A
Capital Outlay 0 15,000 15,000 N/A
Transfers Out 0 0 0 N/A
Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 1,517 55,000 53,483 3526.3%
Net Change in Fund Balance 6,387 (35,000) (41,387) -648.0%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 264,634 271,022
Fund Balance, End of Year 271,022 236,022
Page 47 of 87
Special Revenue Funds (Continued)
POLICE RESERVE EQUIPMENT FUND
PROFILE
The Medina Police Reserve Equipment Fund is utilized to track donations to the City of Medina in
appreciation of the Reserves as well as Charges for Services they provide. These donations are accepted
by City Council for various purposes. Various expenditures are approved through the Capital Improvement
Program for a period of five years when enough funds are available.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Charges for Services 0 0 0 N/A
Miscellaneous 2,702 0 (2,702) -100.0%
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 2,702 0 (2,702) -100.0%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Supplies 3,450 3,000 (450) -13.0%
Other Services and Charges 868 1,200 332 38.3%
Capital Outlay 5,854 0 (5,854) -100.0%
Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 10,171 4,200 (5,971) -58.7%
Net Change in Fund Balance (7,470) (4,200)3,270 -43.8%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 16,831 9,361
Fund Balance, End of Year 9,361 5,161
Page 48 of 87
Special Revenue Funds (Continued)
GERMAN LIBERAL CEMETERY FUND
PROFILE
The German Liberal Cemetery Fund was created in 2010 when the cemetery was transferred to City
ownership. This fund is used to account for lot sales that are legally restricted to the maintenance of the
cemetery and principal amounts received and related interest income for the care of the German Liberal
Cemetery.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Charges for Services 23,230 5,000 (18,230) -78.5%
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 N/A
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 23,230 5,000 (18,230) -78.5%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Personal Services 0 0 0 N/A
Other Services and Charges 2,851 4,650 1,799 63.1%
Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 2,851 4,650 1,799 63.1%
Net Change in Fund Balance 20,379 350 (20,029) -98.3%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 173,269 193,648
Fund Balance, End of Year 193,648 193,998
Page 49 of 87
Special Revenue Funds (Continued)
COMMUNITY EVENT FUND
PROFILE
The Community Event Fund was established to account for donations and event costs as they relate to the
City’s Celebration Day.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Miscellaneous 5,751 0 (5,751) -100.0%
Transfers In 4,000 4,000 0 0.0%
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 9,751 4,000 (5,751) -59.0%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Supplies 3,853 0 (3,853) -100.0%
Other Services and Charges 12,533 8,100 (4,433) -35.4%
Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 16,386 8,100 (8,286) -50.6%
Net Change in Fund Balance (6,635) (4,100)2,535 -38.2%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 18,129 11,494
Fund Balance, End of Year 11,494 7,394
Page 50 of 87
Special Revenue Funds (Continued)
CRIME PREVENTION FUND
PROFILE
The Crime Prevention Fund was established to account for donations for the Hamel bike rodeo, Cops and
Bobbers and other crime prevention events.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Miscellaneous 6,100 0 (6,100) -100.0%
Transfers In 0 1,500 1,500 N/A
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 6,100 1,500 (4,600) -75.4%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Supplies 2,450 0 (2,450) -100.0%
Other Services and Charges N/A
Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 2,450 0 (2,450) -100.0%
Net Change in Fund Balance 3,650 1,500 (2,150) -58.9%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 0 3,650
Fund Balance, End of Year 3,650 5,150
Page 51 of 87
Special Revenue Funds (Continued)
CABLE FRANCHISE FUND
PROFILE
The Cable Franchise Fund was established to account for cable related costs. Cable franchise fee revenues
are committed to this fund.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Other Taxes 55,757 67,000 11,243 20.2%
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 N/A
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 55,757 67,000 11,243 20.2%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Other Services and Charges 17,973 15,000 (2,973) -16.5%
Transfers Out 45,000 45,000 0 0.0%
Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 62,973 60,000 (2,973)-4.7%
Net Change in Fund Balance (7,216)7,000 14,216 -197.0%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 68,683 61,467
Fund Balance, End of Year 61,467 68,467
Page 52 of 87
Special Revenue Funds (Continued)
204 226 227 230
Environmental Municipal Field Charitable
Fund Park House Gambling
REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Revenues
Property Taxes 112,000
Other Taxes
Intergovernmental
Charges for Services
Fines and Forfeitures
Miscellaneous 0 0 1,000 0
Total Revenues 0 112,000 1,000 0
Other Financing Sources
Sale of Assets
Transfers In
Total Other Financing Sources 0 0 0 0
Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources 0 112,000 1,000 0
EXPENDITURES & OTHER FINANCING USES:
Current
General Government
Public Safety
Public Works
Parks & Recreation 31,000 0 5,000
Total Current 31,000 0 5,000 0
Capital Outlay
General Government
Public Safety
Public Works
Parks & Recreation 0 331,000
Total Capital Outlay 0 331,000 0 0
Other Financing Uses
Transfers Out
Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses 31,000 331,000 5,000 0
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES AND
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES (31,000) (219,000) (4,000)0
Page 53 of 87
Special Revenue Funds (Continued)
235 236 238 240 245 250 Total
Police Police Reserve German Liberal Community Crime Prevention Cable Special
Forfeiture Equipment Cemetery Event Events Franchise Revenue
112,000
67,000 67,000
0
0 5,000 5,000
20,000 20,000
0 0 0 0 0 1,000
20,000 0 5,000 0 0 67,000 205,000
0 0
4,000 1,500 5,500
0 0 0 4,000 1,500 0 5,500
20,000 0 5,000 4,000 67,000 210,500
4,650 4,650
40,000 4,200 0 44,200
0
8,100 15,000 59,100
40,000 4,200 4,650 8,100 0 15,000 107,950
0
0 0 0
0
331,000
0 0 0 0 0 0 331,000
0 45,000 45,000
40,000 4,200 4,650 8,100 0 60,000 483,950
(20,000) (4,200)350 (4,100)0 7,000 (273,450)
Page 54 of 87
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Page 55 of 87
Capital Project Funds
The Capital Projects set of funds is used to record and keep track of costs for major projects. Often these
projects will cross fiscal years and must be kept separate for assessment accounting or funding purposes.
The City’s Capital Improvement Program includes a five-year projection of capital improvement needs
that will partially be funded from the Capital Project Funds. Some of the funds act as repositories for
capital replacement funds for major assets, such as water and sewer infrastructure. The Capital Projects
Funds include:
Park Dedication Fund
General Capital Improvement Fund
Water Capital Improvement Fund
Sewer Capital Improvement Fund
Fire Facility Fund
Tax Increment 1-9 Fund
Equipment Replacement Fund
Road Improvement Fund
Page 56 of 87
Capital Project Funds
PARK DEDICATION FUND
PROFILE
The Park Dedication Fund is to be used by the City Council as they see the need for new park projects,
outside of expenditures within the General Fund. Park Dedication funds are needed for new park
development, which is the intended use of Park Dedication funds, as mandated by state statute. Park
Dedication Fund projects are presented through the Capital Improvement Plan. Revenues are generated
from Park Dedication Fees charged on new developments.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Intergovernmental 0 0 0 N/A
Charges for Services 162,260 20,000 (142,260) -87.7%
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 N/A
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 162,260 20,000 (142,260) -87.7%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Capital Outlay 945,938 329,000 (616,938) -65.2%
Net Change in Fund Balance (783,678) (309,000) 474,678 -60.6%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 1,560,869 777,190
Fund Balance, End of Year 777,190 468,190
Page 57 of 87
Capital Project Funds (Continued)
GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
PROFILE
The General Capital Improvement Fund provides for the accounting of sources (revenues) and uses
(expenditures) of monies available from several sources such as the General Fund or grant activity. The
City’s Capital Improvement Program includes a five-year projection of capital improvement needs that
will partially be funded from the Capital Improvement Fund.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Intergovernmental 0 0 0 N/A
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 N/A
Transfers In 0 0 0 N/A
Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 N/A
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 0 0 0 N/A
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Capital Outlay 26,850 55,000 28,150 104.8%
Net Change in Fund Balance (26,850) (55,000) (28,150) 104.8%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 259,253 232,403
Fund Balance, End of Year 232,403 177,403
Page 58 of 87
Capital Project Funds (Continued)
WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
PROFILE
The Water Capital Improvement Fund accounts for the construction of water infrastructure. The financing
of these improvements is through a combination of special assessments, water connection fees through
development, and bonding. The fund supports debt service payments of the Water enterprise fund as
follows:
• 100% for the Water Tower, Well and Raw Water Supply Line, Series 2007A bonds (since refunded by
the 2013A bonds)
The City’s Capital Improvement Program includes a five-year projection of capital improvement needs
that will partially be funded from the Water Capital Improvement Fund.
• In 2023, bonding is planned for the water treatment plant expansion project.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Charges for Services 557,800 300,000 (257,800) -46.2%
Special Assessments 0 0 0 N/A
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 N/A
Transfers In 0 0 0 N/A
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 557,800 300,000 (257,800) -46.2%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Capital Outlay 159,579 2,300,000 2,140,421 1341.3%
Transfers Out 205,338 491,480 286,142 139.4%
Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 364,917 2,791,480 2,426,563 665.0%
Net Change in Fund Balance 192,883 (2,491,480) (2,684,363) -1391.7%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 1,931,005 2,123,888
Fund Balance, End of Year 2,123,888 (367,592)
Page 59 of 87
Capital Project Funds (Continued)
SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
PROFILE
The Sewer Capital Improvement Fund accounts for the financing of improvements and the construction of
sewer infrastructure. The financing of these improvements is through a combination of special
assessments, sewer connection fees through development, and bonding. The City’s Capital Improvement
Program includes a five-year projection of capital improvement needs that will partially be funded from
the Sewer Capital Improvement Fund.
• In 2020, and interfund loan of $140,000 was made to the debt service fund for early redemption of
bonds callable.
• In 2021, the interfund loan was paid back from debt service.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Charges for Services 87,433 40,000 (47,433) -54.3%
Special Assessments 0 0 0 N/A
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 N/A
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 87,433 40,000 (47,433) -54.3%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Capital Outlay 24,343 1,010,000 985,657 4049.0%
Transfers Out 0 0 0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 24,343 1,010,000 985,657 4049.0%
Net Change in Fund Balance 63,090 (970,000) (1,033,090) -1637.5%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 3,282,854 3,345,945
Fund Balance, End of Year 3,345,945 2,375,945
Page 60 of 87
Capital Project Funds (Continued)
FIRE FACILITY CAPITAL FUND
PROFILE
The Fire Facility Capital Improvement Fund was created in 2021 and accounts for financing the
construction of a fire facility. The current financing is from reserve transfers and surplus revenue funds.
Other options for future financing include property tax levy and bonding.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Transfers In 295,771 455,000 159,229 53.8%
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 295,771 455,000 159,229 53.8%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Capital Outlay 0 0 0 N/A
Transfers Out 0 0 0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 0 0 0 N/A
Net Change in Fund Balance 295,771 455,000 159,229 53.8%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 300,000 595,771
Fund Balance, End of Year 595,771 1,050,771
Page 61 of 87
Capital Project Funds (Continued)
TAX INCREMENT 1-9 FUND
PROFILE
The Tax Increment 1-9 fund accounts for all tax increment financing (TIF) revenues and expenditures from
TIF District 1-9. This TIF District has been the primary financing tool for the redevelopment around the
Uptown Hamel area and north Hwy 55 and 101 area. Revenues are derived from tax increments on
properties within the TIF District. The TIF District fund makes annual transfers to the 2008A G.O. Bond
Fund - Uptown Hamel and 2005C G.O. Tax Increment Bond Fund – Uptown Hamel (since refinanced by
the 2012B G.O. Refunding Bonds) as necessary based on annual TIF fund analysis. Payments of principal
and interest are also made on two Pay-As-You-Go Tax Increment Notes based on the amount of increment
received on various parcels.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Tax Increments 269,693 548,846 279,153 103.5%
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 N/A
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 269,693 548,846 279,153 103.5%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Capital Outlay 227,366 0 (227,366) -100.0%
Transfers Out 196,200 202,550 6,350 3.2%
Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 423,566 202,550 (221,016) -52.2%
Net Change in Fund Balance (153,872) 346,296 500,168 -325.1%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year (14,665) (168,537)
Fund Balance, End of Year (168,537) 177,759
Page 62 of 87
Capital Project Funds (Continued)
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
PROFILE
This fund is a capital improvement fund for replacement of equipment such as Public Works trucks and
machinery, police vehicles, fire equipment, and major office equipment. Proceeds from the issuance of
Equipment Certificates and transfers from the General Fund have been the primary funding sources.
Beginning with the 2015 budget, the City intends to certify a property tax levy specifically for the funding
of equipment replacement. In 2019, a levy implementation was passed for 2020 and onward.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Property Tax Levy 162,122 312,500 150,378 92.8%
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 N/A
Sale of Assets 29,440 20,000 (9,440) -32.1%
Transfers In 235,267 46,269 (188,998) -80.3%
Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 N/A
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 426,829 378,769 (48,060) -11.3%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Capital Outlay 223,208 654,908 431,700 193.4%
Transfers Out 0 0 0 N/A
Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 223,208 654,908 431,700 193.4%
Net Change in Fund Balance 203,621 (276,139) (479,760) -235.6%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 184,956 388,577
Fund Balance, End of Year 388,577 112,438
Page 63 of 87
Capital Project Funds (Continued)
ROAD IMPROVEMENT FUND
PROFILE
This fund is a capital project fund utilized to construct and maintain the City’s road system. Numerous
projects are scheduled in the five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The City also incorporates the
Pavement Management Plan into the CIP for long range planning.
• In 2023, bonding is planned to cover road project expenses in 2023 and 2022.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Property Tax Levy 56 61,000 60,944 107883.7%
Intergovernmental 366,751 1,295,381 928,630 253.2%
Special Assessments 89,836 0 (89,836) -100.0%
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 N/A
Transfers In 366,751 0 (366,751) -100.0%
Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 N/A
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 823,395 1,356,381 472,043 64.7%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Capital Outlay 1,145,302 2,392,907 1,247,605 108.9%
Net Change in Fund Balance (321,907) (1,036,526) (775,562) 222.0%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 340,229 18,321
Fund Balance, End of Year 18,321 (1,018,205)
Page 64 of 87
Capital Project Funds (Continued)
401 402
225 General Water
Park Capital Capital
Dedication Improvement Improvement
REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Revenues
Property Tax Levy
Tax Increments
Intergovernmental 0 0
Charges for Services 20,000 300,000
Special Assessments 0
Miscellaneous 0 0 0
Total Revenues 20,000 0 300,000
Other Financing Sources
Sale of Assets
Transfers In 0 0
Bond Proceeds 0
Total Other Financing Sources 0 0 0
Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources 20,000 0 300,000
EXPENDITURES & OTHER FINANCING USES:
Capital Outlay
General Government 30,000
Public Safety 15,000
Public Works
Parks & Recreation 329,000 10,000
Economic Development
Water 2,300,001
Sewer
Total Capital Outlay 329,000 55,000 2,300,001
Other Financing Uses
Transfers Out 491,480
Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses 329,000 55,000 2,791,481
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES AND
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES (309,000) (55,000) (2,491,481)
Page 65 of 87
Capital Project Funds (Continued)
403 405
Sewer Fire 406 411 420 Total
Capital Facility Tax Increment Equipment Road Capital
Improvement Capital #1-9 Replacement Improvement Projects
312,500 61,000 373,500
548,846 548,846
1,295,381 1,295,381
40,000 360,000
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
40,000 548,846 312,500 1,356,381 2,577,727
20,000 20,000
455,000 46,269 0 501,269
0 0 0
0 455,000 0 66,269 0 521,269
40,000 455,000 548,846 378,769 1,356,381 3,098,996
0 30,000
649,908 664,908
5,000 2,392,907 2,397,907
339,000
0 0
2,300,001
1,010,000 1,010,000
1,010,000 0 0 654,908 2,392,907 6,741,816
202,550 0 694,030
1,010,000 202,550 654,908 2,392,907 7,435,846
(970,000) 455,000 346,296 (276,139) (1,036,526) (4,336,850)
Page 66 of 87
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Page 67 of 87
Debt Service Funds
Debt Service Funds track the monies collected and paid for the retirement of bonded debt obligations of
the City. Funds are collected in several ways. Some dollars are collected through property tax levies
established solely for payment of these obligations. Some dollars are collected through special assessments
against specific properties in the City which receive the benefits of debt-financed projects. Tax increments
are also dedicated to payment of debt obligations in some cases. If a general pledge of the tax base of the
City is made against a bond obligation it is accounted for in the Debt Service Funds. The City’s Debt
Service Funds include:
G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds 2020A (2012A) Fund (PW/PD Facility)
G.O. Refunding Bonds 2012B Fund (TIF)
G.O. Refunding Bonds 2013A Fund (PW/PD Facility)
G.O. Improvement Bonds 2015A (Tower Drive)
G.O. Refunding Bonds 2016A (2008A)
G.O. Improvement Bonds 2020A (2017A) Fund
Page 68 of 87
Debt Service Funds
G.O. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS 2020A FUND
PROFILE
These bonds were issued in the amount of $6.1 million to fund the 2012 purchase and improvement of the
building at 600 Clydesdale Trail for use as the Medina public works/police facility. Revenues for payment
of this bond issue come from the property tax levy, Water Fund (9%), and Sewer Fund (11%). Expenditures
in this fund are for principal and interest on the bonds and paying agent fees for bond servicing. This debt
will be replaced with refunding bond 2020A.
In 2020, the City issued the 2020A G.O. Refunding Bonds to refinance $4,880,000 of the 2012A G.O.
CIP Bonds, with the defeasance occurring on February 1, 2021.
Revenues for payment of bond 2012A come from the property tax levy and the utility funds (water &
sewer). Expenditures in this fund are for principal and interest on the bonds and agent fees for bond
servicing. This debt will be fully retired on February 1, 2034.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Property Tax Levy 112,976 364,791 251,815 222.9%
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 N/A
Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 N/A
Transfers In 54,154 91,198 37,044 68.4%
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 167,130 455,989 288,859 172.8%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Debt Service 236,779 256,103 19,324 8.2%
Transfers Out 0 0 0 N/A
236,779 256,103 19,324 8.2%
Net Change in Fund Balance (69,650) 199,886 269,536 -387.0%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 435,533 365,883
Fund Balance, End of Year 365,883 565,769
Page 69 of 87
Debt Service Funds (Continued)
G.O. REFUNDING BONDS 2013A FUND
PROFILE
In 2013, the City issued the 2013A G.O. Refunding Bonds to refinance $1,160,000 of the 2007A G.O.
Water Revenue Bonds, with the defeasance occurring on February 1, 2015. A total of $1.4 million of the
remaining outstanding 2007A G.O. Water Revenue Bonds were originally recharacterized as G.O. CIP
bonds in 2012 to assist in the financing of improvements of the building at 600 Clydesdale Trail for use as
the Medina public works/police facility.
Revenues for payment of this bond issue come from the property tax levy, Water Fund (9%), and Sewer
Fund (11%). Expenditures in this fund are for principal and interest on the bonds and paying agent fees
for bond servicing. This debt will be fully retired on February 1, 2023.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Property Tax Levy 69,059 0 (69,059) -100.0%
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 N/A
Transfers In 33,120 0 (33,120) -100.0%
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 102,179 0 (102,179) -100.0%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Debt Service 159,902 157,189 (2,713)-1.7%
Net Change in Fund Balance (57,722) (157,189) (99,467) 172.3%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 238,723 181,001
Fund Balance, End of Year 181,001 23,812
Page 70 of 87
Debt Service Funds (Continued)
G.O. IMPROVEMENT BONDS 2015A FUND
PROFILE
In 2015, the City issued $1,765,000 of 2015A G.O. Improvement Bonds to finance improvements to Tower
Drive. Other sources for the project included MSA, park dedication, grant, and utility funds. The project
is accounted for in the Tower Drive capital projects fund.
Revenues for payment of this bond issue come from the property tax levy and special assessments.
Expenditures in this fund are for principal and interest on the bonds and paying agent fees for bond
servicing. This debt will be fully retired on February 1, 2031.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Property Tax Levy 30,245 60,155 29,910 98.9%
Special Assessments 34,481 49,679 15,198 44.1%
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 N/A
Transfers In 0 0 0 N/A
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 64,726 109,834 45,108 69.7%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Debt Service 146,371 143,828 (2,543)-1.7%
Net Change in Fund Balance (81,645) (33,994)47,651 -58.4%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 305,013 223,368
Fund Balance, End of Year 223,368 189,374
Page 71 of 87
Debt Service Funds (Continued)
G.O. REFUNDING BONDS 2016A FUND
PROFILE
In 2016, the City issued the 2016A G.O. Refunding Bonds to refinance $2,280,000 of the 2008A G.O.
Improvement Bonds, with the defeasance occurring on February 1, 2017. Revenues for payment of this
bond issue come from tax increments generated by TIF District 1-9 and special assessments.
Expenditures in this fund are for principal and interest on the bonds and agent fees for bond servicing.
This debt will be fully retired on February 1, 2024.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Special Assessments 4,495 7,776 3,281 73.0%
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 N/A
Transfers In 196,200 202,550 6,350 3.2%
Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 N/A
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 200,695 210,326 9,631 4.8%
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Debt Service 185,221 191,478 6,257 3.4%
Net Change in Fund Balance 15,474 18,848 3,374 21.8%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 60,831 76,305
Fund Balance, End of Year 76,305 95,153
Page 72 of 87
Debt Service Funds (Continued)
G.O. IMPROVEMENT BONDS 2020A FUND
PROFILE
In 2017, the City issued $1,210,000 of 2017A G.O. Improvement Bonds to finance the Deer Hill
Improvement Project. The project will be 100% assessed; payable at the sale of each lot, issuance of
building permit or at the end of a twelve-year deferment in 2028. The project is accounted for in the Deer
Hill Improvement capital projects fund.
Revenues for payment of this bond issue come from special assessments. Expenditures in this fund are for
principal and interest on the bonds and paying agent fees for bond servicing. In 2020, this debt was refunded
with G.O. Refunding Bond 2020A.
In 2020, the City issued the 2020A G.O. Refunding Bonds to $1,120,000 of the 2017A G.O.
Improvement Bonds, with the defeasance occurring on December 22, 2020.
Revenues for payment of this bond issue come from special assessments. Expenditures in this fund are
for principal and interest on the bonds and paying agent fees for bond servicing. This debt will be fully
retired on February 1, 2031.
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Preliminary Increase Increase
YTD Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Special Assessments 0 0 0 N/A
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 N/A
Transfers In 0 0 0 N/A
Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 N/A
Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 0 0 0 N/A
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES:
Transfers Out 0 0 0 N/A
Debt Service 112,017 112,112 95 0.1%
112,017 112,112 95 0.1%
Net Change in Fund Balance (112,017) (112,112)(95)0.1%
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 1,200,205 1,088,188
Fund Balance, End of Year 1,088,188 976,076
Page 73 of 87
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Page 74 of 87
Debt Service Funds (Continued)
319 321 322
G.O.G.O.G.O.
CIP Refunding Improvement
Bonds Bonds Bonds
2012A 2013A 2015A
REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Revenues
Property Tax Levy 364,791 0 60,155
Intergovernmental
Special Assessments 49,679
Miscellaneous 0 0 0
Total Revenues 364,791 0 109,834
Other Financing Sources
Transfers In 91,198 0
Bond Proceeds 0
Total Other Financing Sources 91,198 0 0
Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources 455,989 0 109,834
EXPENDITURES & OTHER FINANCING USES:
Expenditures
Debt Service 256,103 157,189 143,828
Other Financing Uses
Transfers Out 0
Bonds Paid by Escrow
Total Other Financing Uses 0 0 0
Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses 256,103 157,189 143,828
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES AND
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 199,886 (157,189) (33,994)
Page 75 of 87
Debt Service Funds (Continued)
323 324
G.O.G.O.
Refunding Improvement Total
Bonds Bonds Debt
2016A 2017A Service
0 0 424,946
0 0
7,776 0 57,455
0 0 0
7,776 0 482,401
202,550 0 293,748
0 0 0
202,550 0 293,748
210,326 0 776,149
191,478 112,112 860,710
0
0
0 0 0
191,478 112,112 860,710
18,848 (112,112) (84,561)
Page 76 of 87
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Page 77 of 87
Public Utility Funds
The Public Utility Funds track the revenues and expenses for fee based public utility services provided by
the City. These funds operate on their own ability to generate revenues and receive no property tax support.
Each year the City Council reviews the operations of these funds and sets rates for each service based on
the needs for general operations, capital spending and debt service payments. The public utilities in 2023
include:
Water Utility Fund
Sewer Utility Fund
Storm Water Utility Fund
Page 78 of 87
Public Utility Funds (Continued)
WATER UTILITY FUND
PROFILE
The Water Utility Fund provides for the distribution of potable water to customers. This fund includes the
operations, administration and utility billing for the utility. The City has three separate water systems which it
maintains: Hamel, Independence Beach and Medina Morningside. Water is supplied by ten municipal wells, and
the Hamel system utilizes a water treatment facility. Also included in the Water Fund along with providing the
water is the maintenance of meters, locating water mains and services, testing of the municipal water supply
throughout the systems as required, preventative maintenance, and emergency repairs to the City’s distribution
system. The utility billing operation prepares and sends out utility bills, receives meter readings and administers
the collections and assessment for nonpayment. Agreements with the cities of Maple Plain and Orono are also
in place to provide water to separate developments within the City of Medina.
OVERVIEW
A 1% water rate increase is proposed for 2023; supported by the 2020 Water Rate Analysis. Operating expenses
(excluding transfers) are budgeted to increase $370,816 (includes CIP). Transfers out to the General Fund for
operating costs are budgeted increase of approximately 3%.
In 2012, the City issued $6.1 million of 2012A G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds to fund the 2012 purchase
and improvement of the building at 600 Clydesdale Trail for use as the Medina public works/police facility. The
Water Fund will be transferring amounts equal to 9% of the debt service payments on the CIP bonds through
February 1, 2034. Additionally, in 2012, the City recharacterized $1.4 million of the remaining outstanding
2007A G.O. Water Revenue bonds. The debt was removed from the Water Fund as revenue bonds and was
correspondingly reestablished as CIP bonds to assist in the financing of improvements of the building at 600
Clydesdale Trail for use as the Medina public works/police facility. The Water Fund will be transferring amounts
equal to 9% of the debt service payments on the recharacterized bonds (since refinanced by the 2013A G.O.
Refunding Bonds) through February 1, 2023.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL
2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
PW Director 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
PW Foreman 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35
Office Assistant 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Administrative Assistant 0.10 0.10
Street Maintenance/Inspector 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13
PW Maintenance 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17
PW Water/Sewer Operator 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
PW Maintenance 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17
PW On-call 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.15
Part Time Help
Total FTE's 1.97 1.97 1.97 1.97 1.97 1.97 1.97 1.97 1.80 1.50
CAPITAL OUTLAY
Accounted for in the Water Capital Improvement Fund.
Page 79 of 87
Public Utility Funds (Continued)
WATER UTILITY FUND (continued)
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
OPERATING REVENUES
Charges for Services
Charges for Services 1,321,400 1,377,200 55,800 4.2%
Special Assessments 14,000 14,000 0 0.0%
Meter Sales 20,000 30,000 0 50.0%
Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 0 N/A
Total Charges for Services 1,355,400 1,421,200 55,800 4.9%
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 1,355,400 1,421,200 55,800 4.9%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Personnel Services 236,428 247,244 10,816 4.6%
Supplies 102,020 112,020 10,000 9.8%
Depreciation 350,000 380,000 30,000 8.6%
Other Services and Charges 910,400 1,230,400 320,000 35.1%
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 1,598,848 1,969,664 370,816 23.2%
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(243,448) (548,464) (315,016) 125.3%
NONOPERATING REVENUES
Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 0 N/A
Interest Earnings 5,000 0 (5,000) -100.0%
Water Connect/Reconnect Fee 5,000 10,000 5,000 100.0%
Total Nonoperating Revenues 10,000 10,000 0 0.0%
NONOPERATING EXPENSES
Bond Principal (200,000) (205,000) (5,000)2.5%
Bond Interest (5,338) (1,794)3,544 -66.4%
Fiscal Agent s Fees (800)(800)0 0.0%
Total Nonoperating Expenses (206,138) (207,594) (1,456)0.7%
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS (439,586) (746,058) (316,472)69.7%
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS
Transfers from Other Funds 205,338 206,794 1,456 0.7%
Transfers to Other Funds (127,209) (131,613) (4,404)3.5%
Capital Contributions 0 0 0 N/A
Total Capital Contributions and Transfers 78,129 75,181 (2,948)-3.8%
CHANGE IN NET POSITION (361,457) (670,877) (319,420)85.6%
NET POSITION, JANUARY 1 12,527,709 13,301,072 773,363 6.2%
NET POSITION, DECEMBER 31 12,166,252 12,630,195 463,943 3.8%
Page 80 of 87
Public Utility Funds (Continued)
SEWER UTILITY FUND
PROFILE
The Sewer Utility Fund provides for the collection and conveyance of wastewater through a system of
mains and lift stations. Sewage is treated by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, whose fees
account for a significant portion of this fund’s expenses. Included in this fund is the routine and
preventative maintenance of the City’s collection system and its appurtenances, monitoring of inflow and
infiltration, television inspection of the interiors of mains, and customer service such as providing sewer
locations. This activity involves the operation and maintenance of the City’s ten lift stations, which
includes buildings, equipment, and property. The utility billing operation prepares and sends out utility
bills and administers the collections and assessment for nonpayment. An agreement with the City of
Plymouth is also in place to provide sewer service to an area within the City of Medina.
OVERVIEW
Rates are scheduled to increase by 1% as supported by the 2020 sewer rate analysis. Operating expenses
are projected to increase by $112,357 (includes CIP). Transfers out to the General Fund for operating costs
were reviewed in 2020 and show a budgeted increase of approximately 3%.
In 2012, the City issued $6.1 million of 2012A G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds to fund the 2012
purchase and improvement of the building at 600 Clydesdale Trail for use as the Medina public
works/police facility. The Sewer Fund will be transferring amounts equal to 11% of the debt service
payments on the CIP bonds through February 1, 2034. Additionally, in 2012, the City recharacterized $1.4
million of the remaining outstanding 2007A G.O. Water Revenue bonds. The debt was removed from the
Water Fund as revenue bonds and was correspondingly reestablished as CIP bonds to assist in the financing
of improvements of the building at 600 Clydesdale Trail for use as the Medina public works/police facility.
The Sewer Fund will be transferring amounts equal to 11% of the debt service payments on the
recharacterized bonds (since refinanced by the 2013A G.O. Refunding Bonds) through February 1, 2023.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL
2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
PW Director 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
PW Foreman 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
Office Assistant 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Administrative Assistant 0.05 0.05
Street Maintenance/Inspector 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13
PW Maintenance 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18
PW Water/Sewer Operator 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
PW Maintenance 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18
PW On-call 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.15
Total FTE’s 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.51 1.21
CAPITAL OUTLAY
Accounted for in the Sewer Capital Improvement Fund.
Page 81 of 87
Public Utility Funds (Continued)
SEWER UTILITY FUND (continued)
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
OPERATING REVENUES
Charges for Services
Charges for Services 841,697 939,339 97,267 11.6%
Special Assessments 2,500 2,500 0 0.0%
Total Charges for Services 844,197 941,839 97,267 11.6%
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 844,197 941,839 97,267 11.6%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Personal Services 142,737 154,094 11,357 8.0%
Supplies 5,880 5,880 0 0.0%
Depreciation 100,000 125,000 25,000 25.0%
Other Services and Charges 490,500 566,500 76,000 15.5%
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 739,117 851,474 112,357 15.2%
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)105,080 90,365 (15,090) -14.0%
NONOPERATING REVENUES
Miscellaneous Income 0 0 0 N/A
Interest Earnings 5,000 0 (5,000) -100.0%
Total Nonoperating Revenues 5,000 0 (5,000) -100.0%
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS 110,080 90,365 (20,090) -17.9%
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS
Transfers to Other Funds (130,711) (135,349) (4,638)3.5%
Capital Contributions 0 0 0 N/A
Total Capital Contributions and Transfers (130,711) (135,349) (4,638)3.5%
CHANGE IN NET POSITION (20,631) (44,984) (24,728) 118.0%
NET POSITION, JANUARY 1 4,948,275 4,934,166 (14,109)-0.3%
NET POSITION, DECEMBER 31 4,927,644 4,889,182 (38,462)-0.8%
OTHER CASH INFLOWS
Page 82 of 87
Public Utility Funds (Continued)
STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
PROFILE
The Storm Water Utility Fund provides for the collection and management of storm water throughout the
City in compliance with State and Federal regulatory requirements. The Storm Water Utility provides for
regional planning, surface water quality monitoring, and compliance with the Wetlands Conservation Act,
approved Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL’s) to impaired bodies of water and mandated Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP).
OVERVIEW
Operating revenues are budgeted at a 3% rate increase.
Operating expenses are budgeted to decrease by $152,401 (includes CIP). Potential projects are comprised
of Best Management Practices (BMP’s) implemented in the City’s SWPPP, TMDL Implementation
Plan(s), Loretto Wetland Restoration/Creation, Water Quality improvements relating to Hamel Road
Tower Drive project, Stream, Ditch, and Wetland Restoration, other wetland restoration in MCWD area,
and other general projects recommended by the Public Works Director and City Administrator. Grant
funding is likely necessary for the completion of major projects.
BUDGETED PERSONNEL LEVEL
2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
PW Director 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
PW Foreman 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Office Assistant 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Administrative Assistance 0.15 0.15
Street Maintenance Inspector 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
PW Maintenance 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
PW Maintenance 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Total FTE's 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.60 0.60
CAPITAL OUTLAY
Various Improvements.
Page 83 of 87
Public Utility Funds (Continued)
STORM WATER UTILITY FUND (continued)
2023 Amount Percentage
2022 Prelim Increase Increase
Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
OPERATING REVENUES
Charges for Services
Charges for Services 265,500 275,000 12,000 3.6%
Special Assessments 2,500 2,500 0 0.0%
Total Charges for Services 268,000 277,500 12,000 3.5%
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 268,000 277,500 12,000 3.5%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Personal Services 80,702 84,324 3,622 4.5%
Supplies 5,200 750 (4,450) -85.6%
Depreciation 70,000 75,000 5,000 7.1%
Other Services and Charges 347,673 191,100 (156,573) -45.0%
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 503,575 351,174 (152,401) -30.3%
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(235,575) (73,674) 164,401 -68.7%
NONOPERATING REVENUES
Miscellaneous Income 0 0 0 N/A
Interest Earnings 0 0 0 N/A
Total Nonoperating Revenues 0 0 0 N/A
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS (235,575) (73,674) 164,401 -68.7%
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS
Transfers from Other Funds 0 0 0 N/A
Grants 0 0 0 N/A
Transfers to Other Funds (63,585) (65,493) (1,908)3.0%
Capital Contributions 0 0 0 N/A
Total Capital Contributions and Transfers (63,585) (65,493) (1,908)3.0%
CHANGE IN NET POSITION (299,160) (139,167) 162,493 -53.5%
NET POSITION, JANUARY 1 1,820,543 1,905,138 84,595 4.6%
NET POSITION, DECEMBER 31 1,262,342 1,765,971 503,629 39.9%
Page 84 of 87
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Page 85 of 87
Capital Improvement Program
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a planning document that presents a five-year overview of
scheduled capital projects to address the City’s goals for maintaining public infrastructure. The CIP
includes a long-term financing plan that allows the City to allocate funds for these projects based on
assigned priorities. The five-years within the CIP provides the City with an opportunity to evaluate project
priorities annually and to adjust the timing, scope and cost of projects as new information becomes
available. The information contained in this plan represents an estimate of improvement costs based on
present knowledge and expected conditions.
A capital improvement is defined as a major non-recurring expenditure related to the City’s physical
facilities and grounds. The CIP also distinguishes between projects contained in the City’s operating
budgets and capital improvement projects financed through the City’s capital funds and public utility funds.
The CIP is predicated on the goals and policies established by the City Council, including general
development, redevelopment, and maintenance policies that are part of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. A
primary objective of the CIP is to identify projects that further these goals and policies in a manner
consistent with funding opportunities and in coordination with other improvement projects.
(The CIP will be compiled and presented separately.)
Page 86 of 87
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Page 87 of 87
Fee Schedule
The City Council adopts an ordinance which revises the City’s fee schedule, including fees for land use,
liquor licensing, public safety, and other permits issued by the City. It also establishes rates for sanitary
sewer, water, storm water, and other services.
(The fee schedule will be compiled and presented separately.)
Ordinance No XX
December 6, 2022
CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO. XX
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN AMENDED FEE SCHEDULE
The city council of the city of Medina ordains as follows:
Section 1. The schedule of fees and rates attached hereto as Exhibit A, Exhibit B
and Exhibit C is hereby adopted.
Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective on January 1, 2023 upon its adoption and
publication.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Medina this 6th day of December, 2022.
_____________________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________________
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
Published in the Crow River News this ___ day of December, 2022.
Agenda Item #9B
Exhibit A
City of Medina Fee Schedule
Effective January 1, 2023
Ordinance No. 1
December 6, 2022
Administration
Service Charge
Address Labels $50.00
Address List $25.00
Administrative Appeal $250.00
Affidavit of Filing $15.00
Audit Book copy $50.00
City Code Book Cost + 10%
Copies – single or double
sided (B&W)
$0.25 per page ($5.00
minimum)
Copies or pictures – color 8
½ x 11
$.50 per page ($5.00
minimum)
Credit Card Payments Credit Card fees apply; +
$0.50 if less than $100.00
(excluding utility and HCB
payments)
Delinquent Charges Assessed 10% administrative fee
DVD/Flash Drive/CD $30.00 per DVD/Flash Drive
$20 per CD
Mailing costs of
copies/reports
At cost
New resident listing $20.00
Peddler, Solicitor, Transient
Merchant Permit Application
Fee
$150 up to $200 if extensive
background check is needed
Photographs $20.00 + cost of photo
Service Charge/Non-
Sufficient Funds
$40.00
Notary No Charge
Special Assessment search $25.00
Special Council Meeting
request
$250.00
Special Event Permit Fee $25.00
Tax Increment Financing
application (minimum)
$1,500 (deposit) + c.a.c
Tobacco License (annual) $150.00
German Liberal Cemetery
Service Charge
Gravesite Purchase $1,500.00
Gravesite Transfer $15.00
Interment (Open/Close) for Casket
(Includes locate & marker)
$1,010
Interment (Open/Close) for
Cremation or infant Cherub
$410
Disinterment (Open/Close) for
Casket
$900.00
Disinterment (Open/Close) for
Cremation or infant Cherub
$300
Marker Removal $100
Funeral Service Attendant/Traffic
Control
$150.00
Park and Recreation
Service Charge
Independence Beach Parking
Permit (residents only)
No Charge
Ball Field and Court Use See Exhibit C
Hamel Community Building See Exhibit B
Liquor
Service Charge
3.2 Malt Liquor-off sale $50.00
3.2 Malt Liquor-on sale $100.00
Consumption & Display
License
$200.00
Liquor License Renewal
Background Check Fee
$70 90
Liquor License Investigation
(in-state maximum)
$500.00
Liquor License Investigation
(out-of-state maximum)
$10,000.00
Off-sale $150.00
On-sale Class A: >20,000 sq.
ft.
$7,500.00
On-sale Class B: 12,000 –
20,000 sq. ft.
$6,500.00
On-sale Class C: 6,000 –
12,000 sq. ft.
$5,500.00
On-sale Class D: < 6,000 sq.
ft.
$4,500.00
On-sale Sunday $200.00
Public Dance $100.00
3.2 Malt Liquor one day set
up
$25.00
Temporary on-sale
application fee
$25.00
Wine License $2,000.00
On-sale Brewer Taproom
License
$500.00
Off-sale Small Brewer
License
$150.00
Microdistillery Cocktail
Room License
$500.00
Fire
Service Charge
Fire False Alarm (first) No Charge
Fire False Alarm (second) $150.00
Fire False Alarm (third) $200.00
Fire False Alarm (fourth and
thereafter)
$250.00
Post Fire Inspection $40.00 + c.a.c.
Number of
alarms within
one calendar
year
Formatted: Font color: Red, Strikethrough
Formatted: Not Strikethrough
Exhibit A
City of Medina Fee Schedule
Effective January 1, 2023
Ordinance No. 2
December 6, 2022
Police
Service Charge
Accident/Police Report $.25/page ($5.00
minimum)
Burning Permit (non-resident) $20.00
Burning Permit (resident) No Charge
Dog Impounds $25.00 at Police office or
$22/day Oak Ridge
Kennels
Reserve Officer at event/per
hour
$25.00
Event Security (per officer/per
hour)
$100.00 and $125.00 on
Holidays (3-hour min.)
Fingerprinting Resident & Employees
$20.00 up to 3 cards, $5.00
each additional card. Non-
residents $30.00 up to 3
cards, $5.00 each
additional card.
Criminal Suspense Files Non-
Medina Case
$20.00
Fireworks Permit $50.00
Gambling Investigation Fee
(annual)
$50.00
Gambling Application for
Exempt Permit
$10.00
Gun Club license (annual) $50.00
Hunting Permit (non-resident) $25.00
Hunting Permit (resident) $15.00
Kennel License (City Council
Review)
$300 (deposit) + c.a.c.
Kennel License
(Administrative Review)
$100.00
Kennel License (Waiver) $300 (deposit) + c.a.c.
Letter of Conduct $15.00
Police False Alarm (first) No Charge
Police False Alarm (second) $25.00
Police False Alarm (third) $50.00
Police False Alarm (fourth) $75.00
Police False Alarm (fifth and
thereafter)
$150.00
Vehicle Impound/Storage $10.00/day + towing fees
No Parking Sign Deposit $5.00 per sign. Deposit
returned when signs are
returned.
Public Works
Service Charge
Curb stop repair $250.00 (deposit) + c.a.c.
Driveway Curb Cut Review $100.00 (no fee if in
connection with building
permit fee >$1000)
Driveway Waiver $500.00
Frozen/damaged meter repair $100.00
Non-Compliance (meter
replacement)
$40.00/mo.
Annual ROW Registration Fee $100.00 per year
Noxious Weed / Mowing $150 per hour
ROW Permit $100.00
Small Wireless Facility Rent
$150 Annual + $25
Maintenance
Small Wireless Electrical $73 per node (less than
or equal to 100 watts),
$182 per node (>100
watts), or actual cost
Sanitary Sewer Prohibited
Connection Fee - Residential
$100 per month
Surcharge – noncompliance w/
stormwater prohibition from
sanitary sewer
$100.00 per month
Sanitary Sewer Prohibited
Connection Fee – Comm/Industrial
$100 + $20 per 1,000
gallons per month
Water disconnect/reconnect trip fee $65.00
Unpermitted Hydrant Water Usage $500 (first)
$750 (second)
$1,000 (third)
Radio Transmitter $165.00180
Water meter iPearl (1”) + radio
transmitter & meter horn
$617.00660
Water meter iPearl (3/4”) + radio
transmitter & meter horn
$468.00490
Water meter SRII (1”) + radio
transmitter & meter horn
$556.00
All other meters (at cost)
Trunk Connection Rates per living unit for residential; and, equivalent for
commercial as determined by the Metropolitan Council SAC, except as may
be amended by City policy. City may adjust number of units determined by
Metropolitan Council if it deems it appropriate based on information
provided.
Service Charge
Hamel Urban Service Area-Sewer
Willow Lift Station Area
$860
$1,555
Hamel Urban Service Area-Water $7,575.00
Independence Beach Area-Sewer $860
Independence Beach Area-Water $4,410.00
Medina Morningside Area-Sewer $860
Medina Morningside Area-Water $4,410.00
Sewer Availability Charge (SAC)
Fee
As set by Metropolitan
Council
Maple Plain Service Area-Water Per Maple Plain Fee
Schedule
Number of
alarms within
one calendar
year
Exhibit A
City of Medina Fee Schedule
Effective January 1, 2023
Ordinance No. 3
December 6, 2022
Sewer and Water Rates - All rates monthly.
(MM=Medina Morningside, IB=Independence Beach).
Service Charge
Sewer (residential) minimum $22.7322.96 per month
Sewer (residential) per 1,000
gallons of water usage
$5.685.74
Sewer (commercial) minimum $22.7322.96 per month
Sewer (commercial) per 1,000
gallons of water usage
$5.685.74
Sewer only (residential)
(based on 6,000 gallons per
month)
$34.1034.44 per month
MM & IB Water (residential)
(base charge)
$12.9913.12 per month
MM & IB Water (residential)
0-4,000 gallons
$2.882.90 per 1,000 gallons
MM & IB Water (residential)
5,000-6,000 gallons
$3.253.28 per 1,000 gallons
MM & IB Water (residential)
7,000-10,000 gallons
$4.334.37 per 1,000 gallons
MM & IB Water (residential)
11,000-23,000 gallons
$4.684.73 per 1,000 gallons
MM & IB Water (residential)
24,000 and up gallons
$5.785.84 per 1,000 gallons
MM & IB Water (irrigation)
0-13,000 gallons
$4.684.73 per 1,000 gallons
MM & IB Water (irrigation)
14,000 and up gallons
$5.785.84 per 1,000 gallons
MM & IB Water (commercial)
(base charge)
$12.9913.12 per month
MM & IB Water (commercial)
water usage under 10,000
gallons per month
$4.334.37 per 1,000 gallons
MM & IB Water (commercial)
water usage over 10,000
gallons per month
$5.785.84 per 1,000 gallons
Storm Water Utility Fees
Service Charge
Storm Water Utility
Annual Fee
$36.48$37.57 per Residential
Equivalency Factor (REF) +
Annual Watershed Due
established by specific
Watershed
Storm Water Appeal $250.00
Sewer and Water Rates - All rates monthly.
Service Charge
Hamel Water (residential)
(base charge)
$18.0618.24 per month
Hamel Water (residential) 0-
4,000 gallons
$3.253.28 per 1,000 gallons
Hamel Water (residential)
5,000-6,000 gallons
$3.974.01 per 1,000 gallons
Hamel Water (residential)
7,000-10,000 gallons
$5.425.47 per 1,000 gallons
Hamel Water (residential)
11,000-23,000 gallons
$6.386.44 per 1,000 gallons
Hamel Water (residential)
24,000 and up gallons
$7.227.29 per 1,000 gallons
Hamel Water (irrigation) 0-
13,000 gallons
$6.516.58 per 1,000 gallons
Hamel Water (irrigation)
14,000 and up gallons
$7.227.29 per 1,000 gallons
Hamel Water (commercial)
(base charge)
$18.0618.24 per month
Hamel Water (commercial)
water usage 0 – 9,000
gallons per month
$5.425.47 per 1,000 gallons
Hamel Water (commercial)
water usage 10,000 + gallons
per month
$7.22 7.29per 1,000 gallons
Penalty for unpaid utility
bills
10% per month on unpaid
balance (penalty not interest)
City of Maple Plain Water
Service
Rate established by City of
Maple Plain + 10% Medina
administrative fee
City of Orono Water Service Rate established by City of
Orono + 10% Medina
administrative fee
City of Plymouth Sewer
Service
Rate established by City of
Plymouth + 10% Medina
administrative fee
The Enclave at Medina Raw
Water Usage for the first
2,000,000 gallons per month
$3.25 per 1,000 gallons
The Enclave at Medina Raw
Water Usage above
2,000,000 gallons per month
$3.81 per 1,000 gallons
Dominium (per unit)
0-13,000 gallons
$3.25 per 1,000 gallons
Dominium (per unit)
14,000 and up gallons
$3.81 per 1,000 gallons
Tanker Fill $75.00 + Hamel commercial
water rates
Formatted: Font color: Red, Strikethrough
Exhibit A
City of Medina Fee Schedule
Effective January 1, 2023
Ordinance No. 4
December 6, 2022
Building Inspection Related
Service Charge
Building Permits Based on valuation – 1994
Building Fee Schedule,
except $50 flat fee if
valuation <$1500
Building Plan Review 65% of building permits
Investigation fee (for work
began without permit)
100% of Building Permit
Fee
Demolition (minimum) $100.00 per structure
(residential) + surcharge
$200.00 per structure (non-
residential) + state
surcharge
Fence <7 feet (no Permit);
>=7feet+ = based on
valuation – 1994 building
fee schedule (location
verification)
Building – fireplace $75.00 per fireplace + state
surcharge
Re-side – residential $100.00 per structure + state
surcharge
Re-roof – residential $100.00 ($165 for wood
shingles/shakes) per
structure + state surcharge
Occupancy Financial
Guarantee (ex: occupy home
prior to approval of final
grade; other similar)
$10,000 escrow or $20,000
escrow if septic system is
not completed
Window, patio door, and front
door replacement (existing
openings)
$50.00 (1 window); $100.00
(2+ windows) + state
surcharge
Windows and doors (changing
opening)
Based on valuation – 1994
Building Fee Schedule
Grading, Plan Review
(engineer review of submitted
plans and building permits)
$250.00 (grading plan
review fee is reduced in
cases where combined
building plan review and
grading plan review
otherwise would exceed
$650)
Grading Permit (grading
permit fee for disturbance less
than 1000 cubic yards is
reduced in cases where
combined building permit and
grading permit would
otherwise exceed $1000)
< 50 cubic yards = $50.00
51-100 cubic yards = $75.00
101-1000 cubic yards =
$200.00
1,001+ cubic yards =
$200+$25 per each
additional 100 yds. (max.
$750.00) + financial
guarantee of 150% of cost;
Violations = c.a.c.
Hardcover Surface/shed<200
s.f. (optional permit)
$50.00
Mechanical (residential) $75.00 per piece + state
surcharge
Moving Structure on public
street
$100.00 + c.a.c.
Plumbing (residential) $50.00 (1-5 fixtures);
$10.00 each additional +
state surcharge
Septic (new – Types 1-3)
Septic (new – Type 4)
$250.00 + $100 site visit
$935
Septic Repair (drainage fields) $125.00
Septic or Holding tank only
(ex: floor drains): Connect to
existing system
$100.00
Septic system abandonment $100.00
Septic Violation Inspection $250.00 + c.a.c.
Sewer Hook-up $100.00
Signs (temporary/portable) $50.00
Sign face replacement-wall or
pylon
$50.00
New monument/pylon sign State fee schedule
New wall sign/lighting change $100.00
Storm water Pollution
Prevention Program Review
$200.00
Underground Tank Removal $100.00
Tree Preservation Plan
Review
$50.00 (no fee if part of
grading or building permit)
Water Hook-up $100.00
Water Heater – residential $50.00 + state surcharge
Temporary Structures – res
Temporary Structures - comm
$100.00 + state surcharge
$200.00 + state surcharge
Planning and Zoning
Service Charge
Agriculture Preserve Application $50.00 + c.a.c.
Agriculture Preserve Expiration $50.00 + c.a.c.
Appeal Administrative Decision $500 (deposit); c.a.c.
not to exceed $500
Alternative Upland Buffer
Request or Appeal of Wetland
Conservation Act Staff Decision,
Correction Notice or
Classification
$500 (deposit) + c.a.c.
Appeal of Wetland Corrections
Notice
$500.00 (deposit) +
c.a.c.
Appeal of Open Space Composite
Map and/or reference data
$500.00 (deposit) +
c.a.c.
Exhibit A
City of Medina Fee Schedule
Effective January 1, 2023
Ordinance No. 5
December 6, 2022
Cartway Easement $20,000.00 (deposit)
+ c.a.c.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment $2,000.00 (deposit) +
c.a.c.
Comprehensive Plan Copy $100.00
Concept Plan Review $1,000.00
Conditional Use Permit
application (commercial,
minimum)
$2,000.00 (deposit) +
c.a.c.
Conditional Use Permit
application (Telecommunications
Tower, minimum)
$2,000 (deposit) +
c.a.c.
Conditional Use Permit
application (residential, minimum)
$1,000 (deposit) +
c.a.c.
Conditional Use Permit Annual
Review
$100.00 residential;
$200.00 commercial
Conservation Design collaborative
goal setting process
$1,000.00
Development Improvement
Financial Guarantee (i.e. Letter of
Credit or Cash)
150% amount of
estimated
improvements
Environmental Review (e.g.
EAW, EIS)
$10,000.00 (deposit)
+ c.a.c.
Interim Use Permit $2,000.00 (deposit) +
c.a.c.
Lot Combination or
Rearrangement
Lot Combination of Substandard
Lots
$1,000.00 (deposit) +
c.a.c.
$200 + cost of title
documentation
Maps 11x17 = $1; others =
c.a.c.
Park Dedication Fee (see city
code)
Residential = 8% of
land value but no <
$3,500/unit or
>$8,000/unit;
Commercial = 8% of
land value
Planned Unit Development
Concept
$2,000.00 (deposit) +
c.a.c.
Planned Unit Development
General Plan
$10,000.00 (deposit)
+ c.a.c.
Planned Unit Development Final
Plan
$2,000.00 (deposit) +
c.a.c.
Rezoning Application (minimum) $1,000.00 (deposit) +
c.a.c.
Site Plan Review
“Administrative”
$1,000.00 deposit +
c.a.c.
Site Plan Review $5,000.00 (deposit) +
c.a.c.
Subdivision Application
(minimum) (2-5 lots)
Subdivision Application (>5 lots)
$5,000.00 (deposit) +
c.a.c.
$10,000 (deposit) +
c.a.c.
Temporary Outdoor Sales Event $50.00
Upland Buffer Vegetation
Review/Inspection/Guarantee
150% financial
guarantee
Upland buffer sign $6.00
Vacation $2,000.00 (deposit) +
c.a.c.
Variance Application (minimum) $1000.00 (deposit) +
c.a.c. for residential;
$2,000.00 (deposit) +
c.a.c. for commercial
Wetland Delineation Review $600.00
Wetland Field Estimate (flagging) $300.00
Wetland Exemption Decision/No
Loss
$300.00
Wetland Replacement Plan $750.00 (deposit) +
c.a.c.
Zoning Letter $50.00
Staff Consultant Fees – Staff and consultant time spent on
planning applications (or defined as other c.a.c.) will be
charged to applicant.
Service Charge
City Attorney Up to $280$290 per hour, per
rate schedule
City Engineer Up to $197$205 per hour, per
rate schedule
Survey Crew Up to $214 per hour, per rate
schedule
Prosecuting Attorney Up to $143.75$148.10 per
hour, per rate schedule
Planning Consultants Up to $160 per hour, per rate
schedule
Tree Inspector Up to $90 per hour
City Staff - Professional $90 per hour
City Staff – Public Works $70 per hour + time & half
for over time
City Staff – Field Inspector $90 per hour + time & half
for over time
City Staff – Administrative
Support
$70 per hour + time & half
for over time
Formatted: Font color: Red, Strikethrough
Formatted: Font color: Red, Strikethrough
Exhibit A
City of Medina Fee Schedule
Effective January 1, 2023
Ordinance No. 6
December 6, 2022
*c.a.c. = city accrued costs
*Deposits for land use and other applications must include the fee established by this fee schedule ordinance and any unpaid fees from
the previous application involving essentially the same property by the same or similar applicant.
*Deposits for land use applications that require more than two requests or large in scale shall be determined by the City Administrator.
*Deposits will be returned for land use projects paid in full after final approval, deposits for wetland and grading permits will be
returned upon acceptance of work if bills are paid in full.
*Escrow for building certificate will be returned upon acceptance of project.
*Land use applications are processed by planning, building, finance, engineering and legal departments and all costs associated with
the review shall be billed to the applicant.
Exhibit B
Hamel Community Building Fee Schedule
Effective January 1, 2023
Ordinance No. 7
December 6, 2022
Group Time Period Rental Rate
Monday to Thursday All Day $220
Monday to Thursday < 4 Hours $110
Friday All Day $300
Saturday or Sunday All Day $500
Alcohol Usage* All Day $100
Facility walk-through required: First one is free, if you miss
appointment or need another one, each additional walk-through: Scheduled $25
Appointment with vendor to view facility prior to event Scheduled $25
Change of Event Date $25
Sales Tax Included in all fees. Kitchen Service Area and Outdoor Shelter use included in all fees.
* in addition to base fee
Community Building Security Deposit ○ Time Period Security Deposit Rate
City Approved Medina Civic Groups - Any Day Anytime $100
Monday to Thursday Anytime $250
Friday, Saturday or Sunday Anytime $500
Any Day w/ Alcohol or Dance Anytime $500
○ This fee is to cover any damage to the facility or extra clean-up.
Community Building Cancelation Policy ○ Cancelation Fee
Anytime Prior to 3 Weeks of Event $25
Within Three Weeks of Event Rental Fee
○ If rental fee is unpaid, the amount of rental fee with be deducted from security deposit.
Exhibit C
Field and Court Reservation Fee Schedule
Effective January 1, 2023
Ordinance No. 8
December 6, 2022
Field Usage Fee Table
Field fees are based on a 2.5-hour time slot. If additional time is needed, the fee will increase $25 per additional hour.
Facility Practice Fee Game Fee Tournament Fee
Ball Field* $25 $50 Calculated on a case by case basis
Open Field $50.00 $100 Calculated on a case by case basis
Light Fee: $15 / field / hour – this fee will be required if lights are requested
*Renter is expected to drag the field on day of reservation, chalk for their own games, and prepare field for playing condition in the
event of rain. These fees cover the city’s cost to reserve the field and help pay for annual maintenance and capital expenses
to keep these facilities in playing condition.
Field Usage Security Deposit
$500.00 Security Deposit for field reservations pertaining to games and/or practices per every Field Reservation Application
submitted.
$800.00 Security Deposit for field reservations pertaining to tournaments per every Field Reservation Application submitted.
Tennis Court Fee Rental & Deposits
The tennis courts are available free of charge to residents on a first come, first serve basis. Organized recreational groups may reserve
the tennis courts with advanced approval, based on availability, for the following fee:
Court Rental - $20 per court per hour*
Court Deposit - $150 Security Deposit
*This fee may be negotiated through a separate group rental agreement, which must be approved by the Medina City Council.
Key Deposit
A $25 key deposit is required for issued keys to any building reservation on the facilities.
Keys must be returned by 4:30 p.m. of next business day after rental.
Rental Fees for Amenities
Field House Bathroom Fee
$80 per day to reserve both men’s and women's bathrooms – Monday through Friday
$150 per day to reserve both men’s and women's bathrooms – Saturday and Sunday
Portable Toilets
The City of Medina will determine if Additional Toilets or Special Cleaning needs to be scheduled on the day or days that the fields
are reserved.
Portable Toilet Fees:
$60 Additional Units (per unit); $200 ADA Toilet; $35 Special Cleaning (per unit)
Exhibit C
Field and Court Reservation Fee Schedule
Effective January 1, 2023
Ordinance No. 9
December 6, 2022
RESERVATION FEE AND DEPOSIT POLICY
Recreation Field Reservation fees
Recreation field reservation fees are the fees required for the direct usage of the fields. This fee includes the field usage fee as well as
any fees associated with the requested/required rental of amenities. All fees will be required by the City upon submission of the
reservation application.
Refunds of Reservation Fees
Refunds for all recreation field reservation fees are processed on an individual basis with regards to the conditions of the cancellation.
All cancellation notices and requests for rescheduling must be submitted in writing. Any cancellations that occur upon the day of the
event, the City must receive the cancellation notice by the next business day.
•• REFUND FOR CANCELLATIONS DUE TO WEATHER CONDITIONS. All cancellations that are due to weather
conditions must be verified by the City staff prior to refund. A percent of the recreation field reservation fees may be
remitted to the City according to the percent of field used if event is interrupted due to weather conditions and is not
rescheduled.
•• NO FEE REFUNDS. Recreation field reservation fee refunds will not be given for cancelled game/practice reservations
that are not related to weather conditions less than fourteen (14) days before the event.
•• NO FEE REFUNDS. Recreation field reservation fee refund will not be given for cancelled tournament reservations that
are not related to weather conditions less than thirty (30) days before the event.
Recreation Field Reservation Security Deposit
Recreation Field Reservation Security Deposit is required to secure the performance of the field usage and any administration fees
connected to cancellations or rescheduling. A security deposit will be required by the City upon submission of the reservation
application.
Refunds of Security Deposit
The applicant; having fulfilled the obligations under the field reservation application, City Code Chapter 515, and an after post-event
inspection by the Public Works Department, will have their Security Deposit refunded.
•• A full security deposit will be remitted to the applicant upon having left no financial obligation to the City and having
caused no damage beyond ordinary wear and tear.
•• A percent of the security deposit will be remitted to the City pending:
1) any financial obligation to the City,
2) the percent of damages to the facilities beyond the ordinary wear and tear.
Resolution No. 2022-
December 6, 2022
Member _______ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF
ORDINANCE NO. __ BY TITLE AND SUMMARY
WHEREAS, the city council of the city of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. __ an
ordinance amending the city’s fee schedule; and
WHEREAS, the ordinance is 9 pages in length and consists almost entirely of a chart and
exhibits; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, section 412.191, subd. 4, allows publication by title and
summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and
WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the
public of the intent and effect of the ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that
the City Clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. __ to be published in the
official newspaper in lieu of the entire ordinance:
Public Notice
The city council of the city of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. __. The ordinance revises
the city’s fee schedule, including fees for public safety, sewer and water, storm water, planning and
zoning, building, and other services. The ordinance will not be codified. The full text of Ordinance
No. __ is available for inspection at Medina city hall during regular business hours.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that the City
Clerk keep a copy of the ordinance in the clerk’s office at city hall for public inspection and that the
City Clerk post a full copy of the ordinance in a public place within the city.
Resolution No. 2022-
December 6, 2022
2
Dated: December 6, 2022.
_____________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member __ and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 1 of 16 December 6, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat City Council Meeting
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: December 1, 2022
MEETING: December 6, 2022 City Council
SUBJECT: Medina Ventures – Medina Park and Boardwalk -
1472 Highway 55 (PID 0211823330003) – PUD General Plan; Pre-Plat
Summary of Request
Medina Ventures is requesting approval of a PUD General Plan
and preliminary plat for a development including commercial
uses and four townhome units located along Meander Road east
of Arrowhead Drive, west of Fields of Medina West.
The City provided comments on a PUD Concept Plan earlier this
year. Excerpts from these discussions are attached for reference.
The concept plan had shown similar commercial uses south of
Meander Road, with the daycare building being further from
Meander. The concept had proposed a three-unit building north of Meander Road.
The subject site is over 18 acres in size, but the majority of the property is within the large
wetland located west and north of the site. The property north of Meander is vacant and contains
approximately 1.0 net acre, and the property south of Meander Road is approximately 4.9 net
acres and includes a barn structure and a grove of trees around the building. An aerial of the
subject site and surrounding land can be found on the following page.
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
The subject property is bisected by Meander Road and the
planned land use and zoning differs on each side of the roadway.
The property north of Meander Road is guided for Low Density
Residential (LDR) development, anticipating a density of
2-3 units/net acre. This property is zoned Rural Residential-
Urban Reserve (RR-UR), which is a temporary zoning for rural
property until developed.
The purpose of the R1 zoning district is to be the default zoning for development within the LDR
land use. The R2 zoning district is also an alternative which the City has the discretion to apply
to LDR property to allow smaller lots or twinhomes to cluster homes to preserve natural areas
and open spaces. The applicant proposes a Planned Unit Development (PUD), which allows an
applicant to request flexibility from the standard regulations to support a development which
better achieves City objectives. The City has a good deal of discretion whether to approve a
PUD as an alternative to standard zoning.
Proposed Uses: Event Venue
Restaurant
Day Care
9,600 s.f. retail
4 lodging/townhomes
Gross Site Area: 18 acres
Net Site Area: 4.9 acre commercial
1.5 acre residential
Land Use (north): LDR
Current Zoning (north): RR-UR
Land Use (south): Commercial
Current Zoning (south): CH
Proposed Zoning: PUD
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item #9C
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 2 of 16 December 6, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat City Council Meeting
The property south of Meander Road is designated as Commercial (C) and zoned Commercial-
Highway (CH), anticipating retail and office development.
Surrounding land uses include Fields of Medina (LDR) to the northeast and property guided for
future LDR development to the north. Property to the southeast is guided for future Commercial
development and currently farmed. Highway 55 is located to the south and a large wetland to the
west. The wetland extends onto the subject site, and the majority of the northern section of the
site is within the wetland.
Staff has attached the Vision and Community Goals, the general land use principles and
objectives of residential and commercial land uses from the Comprehensive Plan. The criteria for
reviewing a PUD include determining whether the PUD meets these objectives better than a
development following the general ordinance standards. The applicant describes how they
believe their proposal achieves these purposes and objectives in their narrative.
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 3 of 16 December 6, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat City Council Meeting
Purpose of a Planned Unit Development
According to Section 827.25, PUD provisions are established to provide comprehensive
procedures and standards designed to allow greater flexibility in the development of
neighborhoods and/or nonresidential areas by incorporating design modifications and allowing
for a mixture of uses. The PUD process, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this
Code related to setbacks, lot area, width and depth, yards, and other development standards is
intended to encourage:
1. Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic
expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design, and placement of structures and by the
conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments.
2. Higher standards of site and building design.
3. The preservation, enhancement, or restoration of desirable site characteristics such as high quality
natural resources, wooded areas, wetlands, natural topography and geologic features and the
prevention of soil erosion.
4. Innovative approaches to stormwater management and low-impact development practices which
result in volume control and improvement to water quality beyond the standard requirements of
the City.
5. Maintenance of open space in portions of the development site, preferably linked to surrounding
open space areas, and also enhanced buffering from adjacent roadways and lower intensity uses.
6. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly
development and use pattern and more convenience in location and design of development and
service facilities.
7. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lower
development costs and public investments.
8. A development pattern that effectuates the objectives of the Medina Comprehensive Plan. (PUD is
not intended as a means to vary applicable planning and zoning principles.)
9. A more desirable and creative environment than might be possible through the strict application on
zoning and subdivision regulations of the City.
The applicant has provided a description of the flexibility contemplated by the PUD. These are
discussed throughout the report but can be summarized as follows.
• Setback for Daycare building to Meander Road – the daycare structure is proposed 12’ from
the Meander Rd right-of-way rather than the 25’ required by CH district. The applicant notes
that the building is proposed to be oriented such that the western 1/3 of the building is close to
Meander Road. The eastern 2/3 of the structure exceeds the minimum.
• Setback between twinhomes – The applicant proposes 12’ between twin home buildings. The
R2 district requires 20 feet.
• Architectural/Building Materials – the applicant proposes a mix of exterior building materials
which are different from the CH standards.
• Upland buffers – the applicant proposes to meet the average upland buffer area on the
development site, but proposes limited areas narrower than the minimum width contemplated
in the ordinance. The applicant proposes to reduce the area of the required buffer north of
Meander Road, and provide an equal area south of Meander Road. The applicant also
proposes fencing and physical separation from these buffers rather than the setback required
by code.
• Additional density north of Meander Road – the property north of Meander Road is guided
Low Density Residential (LDR), allowing development at 2-3 units/acre. The applicant
proposes 4 units, which would equate to approximately 3.5 units/acre. The Comprehensive
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 4 of 16 December 6, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat City Council Meeting
Plan allows for up to +20% density (3.6 units/acre) “for developments that protect the natural
features or exceed other standards of the zoning district.”
• Parking Lot Landscaping – the applicant proposes to reduce the landscaped area within the
parking lot from 8% to 5% of the parking lot area. The applicant notes that their landscaping
throughout the remainder of the site will exceed minimum standards and that the design of the
event venue and twinhomes should be viewed as contributing to the landscaping of the site.
• Tree Replacement – there are many large cottonwood and boxelder trees on the site, as well as
many ash trees. The applicant requests flexibility for replacement because there are no
wooded areas on the site, and in recognition of the comparatively low quality of the trees and
the fact the site is intended for more intensive commercial development.
• Parking – the applicant proposes alternative measures to reduce parking need for large events,
such as valet service, shuttling, and rideshare. This type of flexibility may be permissible
under the general parking standards, but may be better implemented through the PUD.
Proposed Plat/Site Layout-Commercial
The following table compares the proposed commercial development with the dimensional
standards of the CH district. The applicant proposes an integrated development which shares
parking. As such, parking crosses the property lines and the buildings are closer to one another.
Setbacks noted below are to the exterior of the site
CH
Requirement
Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4
Minimum Lot Size 1 acre (0.5 acre
if coordinated)
6.123 acre 0.698 acre 0.784 acre 0.674 acre
Minimum Lot Width 100 feet 360’ 220’ 152’ 201’
Minimum Lot Depth 120 feet 560’ 120’ 250’ 160’
Front Setback
(Meander)
25 feet 160’ 12’ NA NA
Front Setback-Hwy 55 50 feet 177’ NA 140’ 138’
Side Setback 15 feet 205’ W 29’ E
22’ E 285’ W
Residential Setback 50 feet 160’ 48’ NE
12’ N
440’ 440’
Parking Setbacks
Front Yard 25 feet 62’ 62’ NA NA
Side/Rear 10 feet 310’ W 10’ E 10’ E NA
Residential 40 feet 62’ N 62’ N NA NA
Building Height 45 feet 30’ 23’ 18’ 16’
Hardcover 75% 43% of gross area; 62.8% of upland area
The proposed lots meet the dimensional standards required for lots within an integrated
development. The applicant proposes flexibility for the setback for the daycare building from
Meander Road. The building is proposed to be arranged diagonally from Meander Road, so that
approximately 1/3 of the structure is less than 25’ from the front line and the eastern 2/3 of the
structure exceeds 25’. Staff believes it is important to consider the feel and characteristic of
Meander Road when considering the required setback. The roadway has a speed limit of 40
MPH and will be relatively high volume. The street does serve primarily a local purpose,
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 5 of 16 December 6, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat City Council Meeting
providing access to adjacent neighborhoods and commercial developments rather than through-
traffic. Staff encourages the Planning Commission and Council to provide clear direction on
whether this reduction is desirable. If the reduced setback is not supported, the footprint of the
building would likely need to be reduced.
The Fire Chief has recommended a secondary emergency access to the commercial area. The
applicant proposes a wide, heavily constructed trail/sidewalk from Meander Road to the
northeastern corner of the parking lot to serve this purpose. Staff recommends that the design of
this emergency access meet the recommendations of the Fire Chief and City Engineer. Staff also
recommends a condition that this secondary access be plowed in the winter to maintain usability.
Proposed Plat/Site Layout – Residential
The applicant proposes four twinhomes north of Meander. The property north of Meander Road
contains approximately 1.0 net acres, so two or three units would meet the allowed range of the
LDR land use (2-3 units/acre). It appears that the net acreage was erroneously calculated at 1.5
acres during concept plan review, which is why the applicant proposes 4 units, which is
approximately 3.5 units/acre. The Comprehensive Plan does allow up to +20% density “for
developments that protect the natural features or exceed other standards of the zoning district.”
The Planning Commission and City Council should provide clear direction on whether the
proposed benefits of the PUD justify additional density.
The R1 zoning district is the main intended district to implement development in the LDR land
use. The R2 zoning district is an alternative at the City’s discretion to smaller lots to cluster
homes to protect natural resources and open space. As noted above, a PUD allows “deviation
from the strict provisions of this Code related to setbacks, lot area, width and depth, yards, and
other development standards” to serve the purposes described in the PUD ordinance. To analyze
whether to approve a rezoning to PUD, the City compares the request to the expectations of the
underlying zoning designation.
The R1 district is generally limited to detached single-family homes and the R2 zoning district
allows single- and two-family dwellings. The applicant proposes two-unit buildings. Staff
believes the best comparable is likely the R2 zoning district, but the following table compares the
plan to the R1 and R2 districts for context.
R1 Requirement R2
Requirement
Proposed
Net Density 2-3 units/acre 2-3 units/acre 3.5 units/acre
Minimum Lot Size 11,000 s.f. 5,000 s.f./unit 14,520 s.f./unit
incl shared drive
Min Lot Width 90 feet 50 feet/unit 50 feet/unit
Min Lot Depth 100 feet 90 feet 90 feet
Front Setback 25’ (30’ to garage) 25’ (30’ to garage) 3’ to drive
52’ to Meander
Side setback 25’ combined
(10/15)
15’ combined (10/5) (single-family)
10’/10’ (2-family)
483’ to north
12’ between units
Rear setback 30’ 25’ 489’ to west
Max. Hardcover 40% 50% 50% of net area
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 6 of 16 December 6, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat City Council Meeting
The applicant proposes a shared driveway to serve the units. The R1 and R2 district contemplate
units fronting on public or private streets and require a 25’ front setback. The northern unit is
only 3 feet from the shared driveway. The applicant also proposes 12 feet between the two
twinhome buildings. The R2 district requires 10-foot side setbacks for two-family units (20-feet
combined).
The applicant originally requested approval to utilize the homes as lodging units which could be
occupied on short-term basis primarily by people who were holding events in the venue. The
City’s residential districts would anticipate each unit being utilized as a dwelling by a single
family. The applicant originally requested flexibility for each unit to be occupied by groups that
may not necessarily be a single family as described by code and acknowledges that occupancy
may be on a short-term basis.
There were concerns raised at the public hearing from nearby property owners and
Commissioners related to potential noise and intensity of use if the twinhomes were to be used as
lodging. The applicant indicated that having lodging space for users of the venue was imperative
to their project. During discussion, the suggestion was made to expand one of the buildings in the
commercial development to accommodate some lodging, and to develop the twinhomes as
single-family dwellings. The applicant indicated that they believed this would work for their
project and Planning Commissioners indicated support for additional space in the commercial
buildings to accommodate the use.
Architectural Design-Commercial
The applicant has submitted renderings and a narrative
intended to guide the design of the proposed buildings. The
applicant’s design incorporates more metal and wood than
is generally allowed in the CH district.
Building Materials
The CH district requires: “All exterior building materials shall be durable and meet the following
standards:
(a) A minimum of 30 percent of the building exterior shall be brick, natural stone, stucco (not
Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product), copper, or glass.
(b) A maximum of 70 percent may be decorative concrete, split face (rock face) decorative block,
and/or decorative pre-cast concrete panels. Decorative concrete shall be color impregnated in
earth tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a high-quality terrazzo, brick,
stucco, or travertine appearance.
(c) A maximum of 20 percent may be wood, metal (excluding copper), or fiber cement lap siding,
if used as accent materials which are integrated into the overall building design.
Building Modulation – minimum of one element per 40 linear feet of façade. Third floors shall be
set back minimum of 6 feet from lower floors.
Fenestration/Transparency – “Building elevations which face a public street shall include generous
window coverage. Alternative architectural elements may be approved by the city when windows are
not practical.”
Materials CH
Standard
Glass, stone, brick, stucco Min 30%
Concrete (decorative) Max 70%
Metal, wood, fiber cement Max 20%
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 7 of 16 December 6, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat City Council Meeting
Multi-sided Architecture – “Any rear or side building elevation which faces a public street, an interior
access drive for the development, or a residential zoning district shall include design and architectural
elements of a quality generally associated with a front façade. The elevation(s) shall be compatible
with the front building elevation. Additional signage shall be permitted for an elevation facing a public
street or interior access drive, as regulated within the sign ordinance. Multi-sided architecture shall
not be required in situations where the rear or side building elevation is fully screened from view from
the adjacent street or residential property.”
The Planning Commission and Council are encouraged to provide feedback on the proposed
materials, which differ fairly significantly from the CH standards. Flexibility is permitted in the
context of the PUD if it results is a more desirable design and project than would be achievable
through strict adherence to the CH code.
The PUD provides the City increased discretion on architectural design. If the Planning Commission
and City Council desire improvements to the architecture, they should be discussed at the meeting.
Staff recommends increased modulation of the daycare and retail buildings.
The applicant has submitted a conceptual rendering for adding the lodging room to the venue building.
This information is added at the end of the applicant’s narrative. The information was just submitted
as the packet went to print, so staff has not reviewed. However, staff wanted to include with the
packet so it could be discussed at the meeting.
Architectural Design -Residential
The applicant has provided architectural renderings for the proposed residential building.
The R1 and R2 districts do not provide much in terms of specific architectural requirements
except that garage doors which occupy more than half of a façade have to include architectural
features.
The applicant proposes wood as an exterior material and a solarium feature on the roof of the
structures. Garage doors would be less than 50% of the frontage of the structures. The PUD
process affords the City additional discretion with regard to architectural design on the
residential structures.
Wetlands
The wetland along the western edge of the
development requires upland buffers with the
average width indicated to the right. The
width of the buffer can be averaged along the edge of the wetland, provided the width is not less
than the average width indicated, and provided the area of the buffer is at least equal to the area
of the average buffer.
The City also requires a 15-foot setback for principal structures from the buffers.
Wetland Classification Avg
Buffer
Min
Buffer
North of Meander Preserve 35’ 25’
South of Meander Manage 2 25’ 20’
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 8 of 16 December 6, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat City Council Meeting
The applicant proposes to provide an area of upland buffer which exceeds the minimum area if
the average buffers were applied. However, the applicant requests flexibility to how the buffers
are implemented:
• Buffer width of 2’ adjacent to the water feature along the boardwalk (area to be made up
in other locations along the wetland)
• Provide less area of upland buffer adjacent to the wetland north of Meander Road, but
provide more area adjacent to the wetland south of Meander Road to offset.
• Elimination of structure setback to buffer for the townhomes – fencing is proposed to
prevent impacts to buffer
The boardwalk along the back of the
commercial buildings is proposed at
the edge of the upland buffer. The
applicant requests to construct a
landscape feature (pictured at right,
with more information attached)
within the buffer. The area of the
buffer would be made up elsewhere.
Staff believes it is reasonable to conclude that the landscape feature would have limited impacts
on the purpose of the wetland protection ordinance, provided the area is made up elsewhere.
There is not a significant area draining to the wetland in this location. The likelihood of people
leaving the boardwalk to impact the wetland is fairly limited.
The applicant proposes to reduce the required area of upland buffer adjacent to the wetland north
of Meander Road and provide additional buffer south of Meander Road. The applicant’s purpose
in doing so is to increase the net acreage north of Meander Road so that sufficient net acreage
exists to allow 4 units. Reducing the buffer would also provide more usable space on the site.
The applicant has indicated that they would propose to provide the average required buffer for
most of the frontage of the wetland, except immediately adjacent to the twinhomes, where the
minimum buffer width of 25’ would still be provided. For the sake of calculating density, the
applicant proposes to “transfer” 10,000 square feet of required buffer to the southern wetland,
but much of this buffer would still be provided along the northern wetland.
The applicant proposes that the decks of the twinhomes be permitted to extend to the edge of the
upland buffer. A patio would be located under the deck, which would abut the buffer. The City
requires a 15’ setback for structures from the buffers primarily to reduce the likelihood of
encroachments into the buffer. Staff believes most people would not prefer decks and patios
immediately abutting the buffers. The applicant has proposed fencing between the decks/patios
and the buffers to prevent encroachments in the buffer. The applicant also notes that the units
are intended for short-term rental and lawn and landscape maintenance will be contracted, so it is
not likely that people staying in the units will desire to mow into the buffers.
The applicant is not proposing wetland impacts within their development site, but construction of
turn lanes and the trail to support the development would necessitate 0.13 acre of wetlands
impacts. Staff recommends a condition that any approval be subject to approval and
implementation of a wetland replacement plan.
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 9 of 16 December 6, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat City Council Meeting
Floodplain
A floodplain is located within the large wetland to the west of the site with a base flood elevation
of 986. The lowest floor elevation of the twinhomes and venue basement is proposed at 989,
which meets the minimum required separation of two feet. The plans do include fill below the
floodplain elevation for the street widening and trail construction. The applicant proposes to
excavate in other locations adjacent to the floodplain to provide compensatory storage.
Tree Preservation,
There are a total of 78 existing significant trees on the subject site; approximately 34 trees near
the existing barn on the property and 44 trees (cottonwood, ash and boxelders) along the edge of
the wetland. The applicant proposes to remove 68 of the trees (87%) on the site. The tree
preservation ordinance would generally allow 30% of the trees to be removed without
replacement. The applicant notes that 44 of the trees to be removed are boxelder and
cottonwood, and 19 are ash trees. The applicant requests flexibility from replacement as part of
the PUD. The tree preservation ordinance does include a provision to exempt pioneering trees
such as boxelder, but this is intended as part of natural resource management. The applicant
likely could adjust the grading plan to preserve some additional boxelder and cottonwood
removal, but staff believes flexibility is appropriate as part of the PUD as a result of the
preponderance of boxelders and cottonwoods.
Landscaping - Commercial
Landscaping standards can be altered in connection with a PUD, but the requirements for
commercial districts are provided for reference.
• Building Setting - At least 10 feet of landscaped area shall be provided adjacent to all
buildings except for walks, outdoor sales areas, plaza space and approved loading docks.
Walks within this landscaped area shall be limited to where practically necessary to
serve access points of buildings.
• Minimum
Planting:
• Parking lot landscaping – minimum of 8% of parking lot area
• Landscaping islands every 20 spaces, wider separations for cells of 120 spaces
The retail and restaurant buildings do not provide landscaping areas between the parking lot and
the building. Staff requests feedback from Planning Commission and Council whether
additional landscaping area should be provided.
The plans show approximately 6% of the parking lot area being landscaped, but this may need to
be adjusted to provide adequate turn radius around the islands on the east of the parking lot. The
applicant is proposing a minimum of 5% of the parking lot area to be landscaped as part of the
PUD. Landscaping islands are proposed more often than once per 20 spaces. The applicant
proposes a landscaping/sidewalk area running north-south through the parking lot intended to
break up the parking lot.
Requirement Required Proposed
Overstory trees 1 per 50’ site perimeter 49 trees 51
Ornamental trees 1 per 100’ site perimeter 25 trees 25
Shrubs 1 per 30’ site perimeter 82 shrubs 190+1139
perennials
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 10 of 16 December 6, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat City Council Meeting
Landscaping – Residential
The R2 district would require a minimum of 2 trees per unit. A buffer yard would be required to
the east and west of the subject residential development. In this case, there is a wetland with a
width more than 1000 feet to the west. The applicant has proposed trees to the west of the units.
The shared driveway is proposed only 5 feet from the eastern property line, so the applicant
proposes a line of grasses east of the shared drive as a buffer.
Transportation
The applicant proposes one access for the commercial property to Meander Road along the west
of the project. The applicant has submitted a traffic analysis which has been reviewed by the
City Engineer. The analysis recommended construction of a left-turn lane from Meander into the
site. The City Engineer has recommended that a safety analysis be provided to determine
whether a right-turn lane should be required as well.
The City completed a visioning study for future Tamarack Drive located approximately ¼ mile
to the east during the summer of 2020. The vision anticipated a signalized intersection at
Highway 55 and Tamarack Drive which would serve as the primary access for commercial
development in the area, including the subject site. The study included a broader study of the
future circulation for development property east and west of Tamarack Drive as well. The
conceptual layout approved at the end of the study calls for connection from Meander Road to
Tamarack Drive and for the commercial development in this area to have convenient access to
the connection to more easily reach Tamarack Dr. The City Council discussed potential
connectivity from this site to the commercial property to the east during concept plan review.
Ultimately, the City Council’s feedback during concept plan review was that the City should not
require a street connection through this subject site or a specific connection to the east. The
Council encouraged that the design provide flexibility for potential connection to the east so that
connectivity may be possible depending on the layout of the site to the east.
The proposed layout of this site includes parking along much of the eastern frontage. Staff
believes this provides a fair amount of flexibility, because an access could be extended to the
east almost anywhere along the edge of the parking lot. Staff recommends a condition
addressing the possibility of this future connection in the development agreement.
The Tamarack visioning study had identified the cost of improvements at Highway 55 to install
the signals and turn lanes and had estimated the area of different new uses which necessitate the
improvement. The subject site was estimated as 5.4% of the signal project and 8.2% of the
northern turn lanes at Highway 55. Staff recommends that the City require execution of a
Petition and Waiver allowing future assessment of this portion of the project against the lots in
the development.
Parking
The applicant proposes approximately 230
parking spaces. Adding the total minimum
parking spaces for the uses, a minimum of 254
spaces would be required. The parking ordinances
allows adjustments to minimum parking
requirements for shared parking when peak use does not overlap.
Use Calculation # Required
stalls
Restaurant 1 stall/3 seats 250 seats 84
Venue 1 stall/3 seats 300 capacity 100
Daycare 1/250 s.f. 7500 s.f. 30
Retail 1/250 s.f. 10,000 s.f. 40
Total: 254
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 11 of 16 December 6, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat City Council Meeting
Staff believes the venue and restaurant would share peak use, which would be at different times
from the daycare. As such, providing consideration for shared parking seems reasonable.
The applicant included a parking needs analysis as part of their traffic study. The analysis
concludes that parking would be sufficient during average parking generation. It concludes a
deficit at the 85 percentile of parking generation. The applicant notes that they would propose to
use valet parking and shuttling for large events. The applicant also anticipates significant
rideshare use for the venue.
Staff recommends a condition that the applicant implement these practices as necessary and that
agreements be recorded against the lots ensuring shared parking.
Sewer/Water
The applicant will extend sewer and water to the site from the northeast. Staff recommends that
sewer service be extended north of twinhomes because this is anticipated to serve future
residential development north of Fields of Medina. Staff recommends a condition that the
applicant address comments of the City Engineer, which are attached for reference.
Stormwater/Grading Review
The applicant proposes stormwater management with a dry retention basin for the twinhome area
and a biofiltration basin and underground irrigation reuse for the commercial area. Staff
recommends a condition that the applicant meet the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed
and address the comments of the City Engineer.
Lighting
The applicant proposes lantern-style light fixtures which are downcast, but provide a decorative
shield which glows. Details are included with the plans. The CH district requires all lighting to
be downcast and that light not exceed 0.5 FC at the property line. The applicant has submitted
photometrics, which shows the light at some points along the eastern property line in excess of
0.5 FC. Staff recommends a condition to adjust the light location or to shield the fixtures such
that light does not exceed 0.5 FC.
Park/Trails/Multi-Modal
The Park Commission reviewed the project at their November
16 meeting, and an excerpt from their meeting minutes is
attached. The Park Commission recommended requiring a
trail easement along the north of Meander Road and cash-in-lieu of additional dedication.
The City’s subdivision ordinance requires the following to be dedicated for parks, trails and
public open space purposes, at the City’s option:
• Land – 0.73 acre – Up to 10% of the buildable land
• Cash-in-lieu of land – estimated $60,000-$90,000 (to be confirmed by City Assessor) –
8% of the pre-developed market value; residential portion subject to minimum of
$3500/residential unit, maximum of $8000/residential unit
• Combination of the above
Park Dedication Recommendation
• Trail along north of Meander
• Park fee for remainder
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 12 of 16 December 6, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat City Council Meeting
The Park at the Fields of Medina is located approximately ¼ acre to the northeast of the site and
no additional park improvement are identified in the City’s Park Plan. An existing trail is located
north of Meander Road to the northeast of the site. The City’s trail plan calls for the trail to be
extended westerly to Arrowhead Drive. Staff would recommend that necessary easements be
provided along the north of Meander Road and that the trail be constructed in connection with
the development, as least to the edge of the wetland.
The applicant proposes sidewalk, boardwalk and trail connections within the commercial
development as well. Staff would recommend that the sidewalk near the boardwalk be extended
to the eastern property line for potential connectivity in the future. As noted above, the Fire
Chief has requested a 2nd emergency access to the site. The applicant has indicated that they will
propose a wide and heavily constructed trail/sidewalk along the east of the site from Meander to
the parking lot. Staff believe this trail will provide good opportunities for connectivity to the
east in the future.
The potential route for the Diamond Lake Regional Trail is also in the vicinity of this property.
The route shows the corridor going from
north of Fields of Medina with a grade-
separated crossing of Highway 55. The
conceptual route approved by City
Council for consideration in the Master
Plan is shown in green on the aerial on
the next page. The site is outlined in
pink.
Although the conceptual route is east of
the subject site, staff believes it is
advisable to consider alternative
opportunities to provide the most
flexibility for the trail to be connected in
the future. It may be advantageous to
require dedication of more easements
than may be necessary to provide more
flexibility to link the corridor with
adjacent sites. The City may not utilize
all of the easements, but could vacate in
the future.
In this case, there is a 60-foot wide strip
of property running north-south along
the eastern property line. This strip of
land contains a driveway serving the two
rural parcels north of Fields of Medina.
Staff believes this strip may provide a
good alternative for the north-south
connection if an alternative is desired
rather than running through the Park at
the Fields of Medina. Future
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 13 of 16 December 6, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat City Council Meeting
development of the larger commercial site further east also provides opportunity for a north-
south connection
As such, staff is not recommending requiring land for the Diamond Lake Regional Trail on this
subject site.
Review Criteria
Planned Unit Development
The City has a high level of discretion when reviewing a PUD because it is a rezoning, which is
a legislative action. A PUD should only be approved if it achieves the purposes of the PUD
district (described on page 3), the Comprehensive Plan, and other City policies.
The PUD process allows flexibility to the general zoning standards to result in a more desirable
development than would be expected through strict adherence to the requirements, which in this
case are the CH and R1 or R2 requirements. The process provides flexibility which is ultimately
at the discretion of the City. Such flexibility often cuts in both directions, certain aspects of the
development may not meet the general standards while other exceed minimum standards. The
flexibility provides the opportunity for collaboration in site design because the City can request
adjustments which may be seen as preferred, but would not be required under general standards.
Preliminary Plat
The City has a comparatively low level of discretion while reviewing a preliminary plat. Unless
the Council makes one or more of the findings for denial noted below, a preliminary plat should
be approved.
“In the case of all subdivisions, the City shall deny approval of a preliminary or final plat if one
or a combination of the following findings are made:
(a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city,
or that the proposed subdivision is premature, as defined in Section 820.28.
(b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography,
vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are
such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated.
(c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does
not meet minimum lot size standards.
(d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause
substantial environmental damage.
(e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious
public health problems.
(f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or
private streets, easements or right-of-way.
In this case, the portion of the property north of Meander Road is zoned RR-UR, so the plat is
contingent upon the rezoning to PUD. If the PUD were not approved, the proposed lots would
not meet minimum lot standards, which is one of the findings for denial. If the PUD is approved,
it does not appear that these findings are met, so the plat could be approved, subject to the
conditions suggested below.
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 14 of 16 December 6, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat City Council Meeting
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission and City Council consider the PUD purpose
and Comp Plan objectives to determine if the PUD results in a more desirable development than
that which may be achievable through strict adherence with the standards.
Staff has summarized the requirements of the underlying districts through the report, and the
flexibility being proposed was described throughout, and summarized on the bottom of page 3 of
the report.
The Planning Commission and City Council may find that some amount of flexibility serves the
purpose and objectives described above, but that adjustments are necessary for the request to be
justified. The Planning Commission, for example, indicated that allowing the twinhomes to be
used as lodging units did not serve the objectives. Staff would recommend that the Council
describe any other specific changes which may shift the balance and serve those purposes and
objectives. It is important to acknowledge that the alternative would be that the site may be
developed under standard requirements at some time in the future.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the request at the November 9 meeting. An
excerpt from the meeting minutes is attached for reference. Three people spoke at the public
hearing, and the City received written correspondence from one of the speakers. The City also
received a letter from George Stickney, developer of the Marsh Pointe Preserve development to
the north of the site, who spoke at the hearing. Mr. Stickney provided a list of buyers within this
development and several existing residents in Bridgewater and along Arrowhead Drive who had
signed onto this letter. These letters are attached as well.
Following the hearing, Planning Commissioners discussed the proposal. Overall, Commissioners
indicated support for the proposed development and design for the commercial portion of the
project. Commissioners recommended a condition requiring a vehicle-proof barrier between
Meander Road and the play area for the daycare.
Commissioners indicated that they would support adding lodging space to the commercial area
south of Meander Road and believed this would be a better alternative. Several Commissioners
expressed similar concerns from using the twinhomes as lodging, although a few indicated that
they would not oppose the lodging in the twinhomes if it did not work within the southern area.
Several Commissioners indicated that they believed the four-units to the north of Meander
seemed crowded and suggested that three units appeared to be a better fit as shown during
concept plan review.
Ultimately, the Commission recommended approval of the PUD General Plan and Preliminary
Plat subject to the conditions noted below provided the residential units shall be sold for single-
family use and that square footage may be added to the building(s) in the commercial portion of
the site for lodging for the venue.
1) The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include
the conditions described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy.
2) The Applicant shall construct necessary turn lane improvements on Meander Road.
3) The Applicant shall execute and record access agreement(s) in a form and of substance
satisfactory to the City Attorney to ensure both lots have access.
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 15 of 16 December 6, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat City Council Meeting
4) The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated 10/20/2022 and
09/09/2022 except as may be modified herein. The plans shall be updated to address the
comments of the City Engineer and submitted for review in connection with final plat
application.
5) The Applicant shall dedicate a trail easement along the north of Meander Road right-of-
way and construct the trail to the crossing at the commercial access. Cash-in-lieu of
additional land dedication in an amount recommended by the Park Commission shall be
provided.
6) The Applicant shall update plans to provide a secondary emergency access, the design of
which shall be subject to approval by the Fire Chief and City Engineer. This emergency
access shall maintained/plowed to ensure usability.
7) The Applicant shall submit emergency vehicle turning exhibits and adjust parking lot
layout as necessary to ensure adequate circulation.
8) Vehicle-resistant barriers or fencing shall be provided between Meander Road and the play
area for the daycare.
9) The Applicant shall update plans to provide landscaping adjacent to the retail and
restaurant buildings.
10) The Applicant shall update lighting plans such that light does not exceed 0.5 FC at the
property line.
11) The plat shall dedicate drainage and utility easements over all water mains and hydrants,
over stormwater improvements and in other locations recommended by the City Engineer.
12) The watermain and hydrants within the commercial lots shall be privately maintained.
13) The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site
improvements in order to ensure completion.
14) The Applicant shall execute and record a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement in a form and
of substance acceptable to the City Attorney to describe the responsibility of the property
owners to maintain the private stormwater improvements.
15) The PUD General Plan shall be contingent upon approval and implementation of a Wetland
Conservation Act Wetland Replacement Plan.
16) The Applicant shall meet the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance including but
not limited to: execution and recordation of Upland Buffer Easement Agreement in a form
and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney, planting of appropriate vegetation, and
installation of signage.
17) The commercial property shall be subject to the City’s lawn and landscaping irrigation
regulations. No lawn or landscape irrigation systems shall be permitted to be connected to
the City water system.
18) The Applicant shall update the architectural design of the daycare and retail buildings to
provide improved modulation.
19) The Applicant shall obtain all permits required by Elm Creek Watershed District, Minnesota
Department of Transportation, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council and any other relevant agencies.
20) The applicant shall enter into a petition and waiver with the City in a form and of substance
acceptable to the City Attorney related to future assessment for construction of Tamarack
Drive.
21) Building plans shall be subject to review and approval by City staff for general compliance
with the general plan of development and design standards document dated _____.
Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 16 of 16 December 6, 2022
PUD General Plan/Pre Plat City Council Meeting
22) The Applicant shall provide title evidence prior to or at the time of final plat application and
abide by the recommendations of the City Attorney with regard to title matters and recording
instructions.
23) The final plat application shall be filed within 180 days from the date of this resolution or
the approval hereby granted shall be considered void, unless a written request for time
extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council.
24) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for
the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, general plan of development, construction plans,
and other relevant documents.
Potential Action
The applicant has not updated the plans to show how they may incorporate lodging space within
a building within the commercial development. Staff discussed with the applicant and
determined that it was advisable to present the proposal for City Council review prior to making
these changes, in case the Council indicated that they may require any other significant changes
to the plans. The applicant just submitted a conceptual rendering of how the units could be
added to the venue as staff was preparing to print the packet. This information was included at
the end of the applicant’s narrative. Staff will review and it can be discussed at the meeting.
Staff recommends that the Council review and indicate whether the proposed PUD achieves the
purpose of the PUD ordinance and better achieves the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and
other City policies, or if other changes are necessary to make this finding. Following review,
Council could consider the following action:
Move to table the application to allow applicant to update plans to incorporate lodging
rooms into a proposed commercial building.
Staff would intend to prepare documents approving the PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat,
subject to the conditions noted in the staff report, and subject to any changes directed by the City
Council. These documents would be presented to the Council along with the updated plans.
Attachments
1. Comp Plan Info
2. Excerpt from draft 11/9/2022 Planning Commission minutes
3. Excerpt from draft 11/16/2022 Park Commission minutes
4. Comments received
5. Engineering comments
6. Applicant narrative
7. PUD Flexibility Summary
8. Proposed Architectural Requirement Summary
9. Water Feature Exhibit
10. Conceptual rendering of lodging units added to venue
11. Civil Plans
12. Architectural information
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 11/9/2022 Minutes
1
Public Hearing – Meander Park and Boardwalk – Meander Road, East of Arrowhead
Drive – Medina Ventures – PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat for Commercial
Development Including Event Venue, Daycare, Restaurant and Retail (PID
0211823330003)
Finke stated that the Commission reviewed a concept plan for this project on the subject site earlier this
year. He identified the subject site location and noted that the proposed development would contain
commercial south of Meander and residential north of Meander. He stated that the applicant has requested
that the twinhome residential products be allowed for lodging/short-term rental use. He noted that a PUD
is being requested in order to allow for flexibility in the development. He reviewed surrounding land uses.
He provided details on access for both the commercial and residential development components and
reviewed renderings provided by the applicant. He first focused on the commercial portion of the
development which has an underlying zoning of Commercial Highway. He compared the standards of that
zoning district to what is proposed under the PUD. He stated that the Fire Department requested a
secondary emergency access, which would not need to be a full access, and noted that an extra wide and
well-constructed trail would be proposed to allow access in the scenario that the primary access could not
be used by emergency vehicles during an emergency. He reviewed details related to parking noting the
options provided by the applicant to address larger events where more parking may be needed such as
valet parking and shuttle service. He moved to the residential portion of the development, which is
currently zoned Rural Reserve, therefore he provided both the R-1 and R-2 standards for comparison to the
proposal requests. He stated that the four units proposed would equate to about 3.5 units per acre. He
reviewed the flexibility requested related to wetland buffers, noting that less buffer is requested north of
Meander in return for more buffer provided south of Meander. He reviewed architectural details noting
that the application would propose more wood and metal material than typically allowed in the zoning
district. He also provided architectural details for the residential twinhomes. He stated that in aggregate
the applicant would propose more buffer than required but through more averaging than would generally
be allowed. He stated that the landscaping plan was provided in the packet and noted that the internal
portion of the parking lot would be proposed to have five percent landscaping while the Code would
require eight percent. He noted that the applicant has provided more landscaping around the site to offset
that reduction.
Jacob asked if there is an ordinance on short-term rentals.
Finke replied that the City does not regulate rentals, long or short term. He noted that under the residential
districts, rentals ought to occur to only one family at a time. He stated that is why these units would be
proposed as lodging to allow for multiple parties to occupy the rentals that may be involved in the events.
Popp asked if there is a fence proposed for the daycare.
Finke replied that the plans to show a fence.
Popp referenced another daycare/school in Medina which seems to be closer to the roadway than what is
proposed in this case.
Finke replied that the structure is closer to the roadway in that scenario, noting that the fence is on the
property line in that case which is shown in this case as well. He noted that the fence in that case was
required to be reinforced as part of the franchise agreement.
Popp stated that he would be interested in that additional barrier requirement. He recognized that it is not
required under Code but asked if it could be required under the PUD.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 11/9/2022 Minutes
2
Finke confirmed that could be a condition added through the PUD.
Jacob referenced the larger event parking and noted that there are still the same number of stalls, whether
they are valet parked or self-parked and asked how that would provide additional parking.
Finke commented that shuttling could be used, and valet can be parked more tightly, using driving lanes as
less circulation is needed. He noted that the applicant can provide more details.
Popp commented that there appears to be ten parking stalls for the twinhomes and asked what the
minimum parking would be.
Finke replied that if treated as residential units, two stalls per unit would be required. He noted that under
R-3 or R-4, two parking stalls would be required per unit with an additional .25 stall per unit for guests.
He confirmed that the parking proposed would exceed both those requirements.
Ahmed asked the management structure for the short-term rentals. He also asked for details on the
transparent structure on the residential development.
Nielsen asked if handicap stalls would be required for the residential units if they are to be used for
lodging.
Finke stated that he did not have the answer for that question but could look into that.
Rhem invited the developer to come forward.
Chris Peterson, applicant, noted that he lives about 400 feet from the northeastern corner of the
development. He stated that they submitted the concept plan late last year and after receiving feedback
from the commissions and City Council as well as other entities such as the watershed, they have been
working with City staff to incorporate that feedback. He believed that their proposed development would
add considerable value to residents and businesses while meeting goals within the Comprehensive Plan.
He stated that two third of the site is occupied by wetlands and they chose to take advantage of that by
incorporating unique design elements and flexibility through the PUD requested. He stated that their
requested development meets all nine criteria required for the PUD and provided an overview. He stated
that the development would not be possible if likely held to the strict zoning requirements of the City,
noting that the PUD allows them the creative flexibility to design something that will draw families from
this community and beyond, while creating jobs, providing commercial and recreational opportunities, and
protecting the rural character of the community. He stated that he chose to try to develop the property
because he lives in the area and has worked in the area most of his life. He believed that these are
amenities that people in the community are looking for. He commented that the residential units would be
collectively managed by an HOA. He stated that the transparent structures are not yet set in stone as they
may be cost prohibitive but noted that the intention was to provide a space where people could look out on
the wetlands. He stated that the residential units would be built at grade and therefore would be accessible
to elderly and handicap and therefore the driveway would be the most accessible location for parking. He
stated that two bedrooms would be provided on the main floor with additional bedrooms on other floors.
Piper asked if elevators would be considered to make the units fully accessible.
Peterson stated that they would not put in elevators, as two bedrooms would be available on the main level
for those that may not be able to traverse stairs.
Piper asked if each residential unit would be individually owned and part of the HOA.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 11/9/2022 Minutes
3
Peterson replied that the units would be collectively owned and managed. He noted that the financing and
structure of ownership has not yet been finalized.
Popp asked if the residential units would be 1,800 square feet with three floors.
Peterson replied that currently the plan is for three floors with the atrium. He stated that their intent is to
encourage looking away and towards the wetland. He stated that the venue location was chosen in order to
be as far from residential as possible. He stated that if the third story is added, it would be partially
enclosed.
Popp asked if the units are shown perpendicular in order to take advantage of the wetland views.
Peterson replied that they are taking advantage of the topography while also maximizing the wetland
views.
Popp commented that if the homes were not at an angle, it could perhaps better utilize the area and provide
more of a setback but recognized that would lose the intent to maximize the wetland views.
Peterson noted that they have proposed a split-level fence to keep people in the lower level out of the
wetland.
Piper asked the number of people that would be allowed under Fire Code for the event venue.
Peterson stated that is unclear but would exceed the number that they would propose the average they
would propose of 300 people.
Piper asked if there would be a kitchen and catering capacity within the building.
Peterson confirmed that would be included in the venue, noting that the kitchen would be proposed to be
1,300 square feet in order to accommodate two different events at the same time.
Piper commented that she does see a dilemma in a venue that accommodates 300 people with only 230
parking stalls.
Peterson explained that when going to events, most people tend to carpool or utilize Uber or Lyft. He
stated that during the daycare parking could be used for evening and weekend events. He stated that valet
parking would also increase the density of the parking area as regular circulation would not be needed. He
stated that Loram has also offered the use of their parking for weekend shuttles if needed. He noted that
they chose to put the restaurant at the other corner in order to keep the traffic for those two uses separate.
Finke clarified the floor area of the residential units, noting that the 1,800 square foot is the footprint
including the garage. It was clarified that the main level would be 1,800 square feet plus the garage.
Nielsen believed the original concept had three residential structures and asked why it was increased to
four.
Peterson commented that given that the purpose would be for lodging and the symmetry they believed that
four units would be a better fit.
Jacob referenced the basement of the venue and asked for details on the space marked for data storage.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 11/9/2022 Minutes
4
Peterson commented that there is 7,000 square feet and part of the reason for that space is to allow for
storage of items without having to go outside. He stated that given the cost of the development they
looked at potential revenue sources and data storage was an option that would also produce excess heat
that could heat the conservatory in the winter. He stated that they do not have anything proposed at this
time but wanted to ensure that could be a revenue option for the future.
Popp asked if there has been consideration for EV charging in the parking lot.
Peterson commented that he would like to consider that option, noting that he would also like to utilize
solar energy panels on the roof.
Popp commented that there is an extensive amount of wetland mitigation and asked if the tree removal
would be unavoidable in order to build the structure.
Peterson commented that most of the trees on the site proposed for removal are not quality trees. He noted
that they would be doing everything possible to replant trees and provide screening as many couple and
wedding parties would want to take photos near the wetland.
Nielsen referenced a letter about crypto mining rigs in the basement and asked the applicant to address the
comments.
Peterson provided more details on crypto and block chain technology and noted that this equipment would
be similar to data servers used by a company.
Nielsen asked if they should be concerned as to the statements in the letter and whether the statements in
the narrative as misleading related to this type of use/technology.
Peterson commented that he has not yet seen that letter but noted that they do intent to use this facility as
an educational opportunity for these new technologies. He stated that he would be glad to provide more
information on why they believe this would be a valuable component to this development.
Piper asked if the data center would require a tremendous amount of electricity.
Peterson commented that it would depend upon the size of the data center but noted that the solar panels
would help to offset that energy use. He noted that the event venue would also not operate fully, every
day.
Rhem referenced the daycare and asked if there is an opportunity to adjust the orientation of the building
and play area.
Peterson replied that there are a few things that could be done to adjust the orientation. He noted that the
building could be shrunk, or they could change the orientation. He stated that this orientation was chosen
in order to provide a northwest view rather than a view of the highway.
Nielsen stated that perhaps sliding the daycare to the north and east would provide more room to the north.
It was noted that there are utilities on the east that would need to be avoided.
Peterson had the opportunity to review the letter and wanted to address the comments expressed. He stated
that they do have an NFT project, which would be a very small portion of the event center. He stated that
they could then educate the community and hold their own events on that topic once per year.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 11/9/2022 Minutes
5
Nielsen referenced the comments related to a fire hazard.
Peterson replied that if the rigs were put into the building, they would work with the Fire Department and
meet the required safety codes as they would not want to create an unsafe situation.
Rhem referenced the twinhomes, noting that road abuts a private road and asked if there would be
opportunity for connection.
Peterson stated that he would love to and noted that he has spoken with the landowner, and he is not
interested in allowing them to use the private drive. He noted that he also offered to pave the private road,
but the landowner was still not interested at this time.
Popp asked if the applicant would be open to a condition requiring a weight bearing fence for the daycare
on the Meander side.
Peterson stated that he would be in agreement with that condition as someone with young children himself.
Rhem opened the public hearing at 8:11 p.m.
George Stickney, Marsh Point Preserve, stated that he is developing the property to the north noting that
all of those lots were created with a 50-foot buffer. He commented that he is selling high-end villas on his
property and has already closed on eight of those properties. He stated that originally, he also planned a
play area for children within the development, but the Bridgewater neighbors did not want to see that type
of amenity because of concerns for noise. He stated that he used those funds that had been budgeted to
work with neighbors to remove undesired trees on their private properties and plant higher value trees to
provide more screening. He stated that he has worked hard to create a peaceful development overlooked
Lake Medina. He believed that the three townhomes in the concept plan would be listed for individual
sale. He commented that after a wedding or convention, it would be unlikely that one family would
occupy one of the twinhomes for the night and instead envisioned that the twinhomes would become an
afterparty location. He stated that he is not opposed to the overall development, or even the twinhomes if
they were listed for sale but is opposed to the concept of allowing the twinhomes to be rented by visitors of
the event center.
Nielsen stated that perhaps Stickney should offer to purchase that residential property.
Stickney stated that he is not opposed to the twinhomes being listed for sale as the original proposal stated.
He stated that if the twinhomes remain as party houses for the event venue he will fill the Council
Chambers with residents opposed to this request at the City Council meeting.
Stickney stated that he is not opposed to the twinhomes being listed for sale as the original proposal stated.
He stated that if the twinhomes remain as party houses for the event venue he will fill the Council
Chambers with residents opposed to this request at the City Council meeting.
Terri Schifferle, 4115 Cavanaugh Drive, stated that she wrote the letter that was discussed tonight. She
stated that they would face where the villas are proposed. She stated that overall, she opposes the entire
project. She stated that she works in commercial real estate and is a third-year law student. She stated that
she reviewed the application in attempt to find out why these elements are proposed. She stated that
crypto was not mentioned in the case and therefore the request is misleading.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 11/9/2022 Minutes
6
Jacob asked if there are any ordinances that govern the legal enforcement of issues that arise from that type
of use.
Finke replied that would be handled through the nuisance ordinance.
Piper asked if the developer would move forward if the twinhomes were not allowed to be built.
Jacob asked if the northern development is necessary to support the southern development.
Peterson replied that it is an amenity to the use on the south side of the street.
Finke commented that from a zoning perspective there is flexibility in a PUD to accommodate different
uses. He stated that hotels are allowed in the CH district and therefore it could be allowed to have some
type of lodging within the commercial portion of the site. He stated that if desired, the Commission could
allow for that type of use within the commercial area and the applicant could then provide updated plans to
be reviewed as the review process moves forward.
Nielsen asked whether there would be interest to change the daycare use to a hotel.
Peterson replied that he had thought of it, but the site is small. They would consider options if necessary.
Finke stated that staff had discussions about the likelihood that if the event center were successful a hotel
use would typically follow, if not on this site, somewhere else. He stated that this site could not
accommodate a substantial amount of lodging on the south side. He stated that a similar number of
bedrooms to what was proposed on the north side could most likely be accommodated on the south side,
but the daycare could not be a hotel because of the lack of parking.
Nielsen stated that she loves the idea of the whole development. She stated that she struggles with the
portion to the north and would prefer to see three units sold as single-family homes rather than used as
lodging. She stated that reducing from four units to three units would also provide more space for buffers.
She stated that she would also agree with some type of lodging on the southern side.
Popp commented that this is an innovative design and Medina is lucky to have this type of proposal to
consider. He believed that the PUD makes sense as this is a unique concept. He liked the design
highlighting the natural resources. He stated that the northern lot is crowded which creates the setback
issues. He also wanted to see the weight bearing fence for the daycare. He stated that he agrees with the
conditions recommended by staff. He stated that he would prefer the northern lots be sold individually
with a potential for lodging on the southern portion of the development. He stated that he is not opposed
to the proposal, as Airbnb is designed to filter out the problem renters. He commented that is not a deal
breaker to him, but he also wants to be considerate of the residents. He stated that perhaps the solution is
to provide the lodging on the southern site, noting that would be the preferred option.
Peterson stated that they could review that option with his architects.
Nielsen asked how the City could enforce that those units be sold as opposed to being rented.
Finke replied that the homes could be owner occupied or rented, it’s the lodging that is required to be
approved through the PUD.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 11/9/2022 Minutes
7
Ahmed stated that he supports the project as a whole but does have concern with the twinhomes being
rented and the safety concern of having people that have been drinking walk across to those units. He
appreciated the flexibility of the applicant in moving the lodging aspect to the south.
Jacob commented that he likes the direction this is headed with the solution to place lodging on the south
side. He stated that he would love to see three or four homes sold as single-family dwellings on the north
as he is not comfortable with the VRBO concept for those units.
Rhem commented that there was good discussion with the developer and the residents. He stated that he
would be open to the concept of rentals on the northern portion but also understands the point of view that
is not desired by residents and appreciated the compromise solution proposed.
Piper asked how a motion would be phrased that allows housing on the northern property but with the
restrictions discussed that those units would need to be sold as single-family dwellings.
Finke replied that in order to construct four twinhomes, there would still need to be flexibility through a
PUD and therefore a condition could be added requiring that those units be sold as single-family
dwellings. He noted that the challenge would be in allowing lodging on the southern portion without
seeing the design concept. He asked if the Commission would want to make that allowance without seeing
the design.
Jacob asked if the north side could be decoupled from the south in its own PUD.
Finke replied that a PUD would allow for a mix of uses but noted that it would be cleaner to separate the
two but still allow for those to move forward under the same review process.
Piper asked if the Commission would want to table this until they could see how this would be laid out.
Finke stated that the main question would be whether the Commission would want to see details on how
lodging could be incorporated into the project on the southern side. He stated that if the Commission is not
comfortable making a recommendation without seeing more, it would still be advantageous to present to
Council in order to obtain any other direction and feedback as well.
Motion by Nielsen, seconded by Rhem, to recommend approval of the PUD subject to the conditions in
the staff report with the following changes: residential units shall be sold for single-family use; square
footage may be added to the building in the commercial portion of the site for lodging for the venue; and
an added requirement for vehicle resistant fencing for the daycare. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent:
Grajczyk)
Medina Park Commission Excerpt from Draft 11/16/2022 Minutes
1
MEDINA VENTURES – Meander Park and Boardwalk – PUD General Plan; Pre-Plat
Planning Director Finke provided background information on the applicant’s concept plan for
development at 1472 Highway 55; reminding the Commission they reviewed the concept plan
earlier in the year, so details will likely be familiar.
Sharp motioned to recommend a credit for the trail easement (10-foot easement beyond the right-
of-way of Meander Road for trail easement) and cash-in-lieu for the remaining park dedication
obligation. Norman seconded.
Motion carries unanimously
November 9th, 2022
City of Medina
Medina City Hall
2052 County Road 24
Hamel, MN 55340
To whom it may concern,
This is an addition to a commentary I have already submitted to the city. This addition comes
with great concern and disappointment.
As I spent more time looking into the ownership and leadership of Medina Ventures, LLC., I came
across a very pivotal set of information.
Specifically, I looked into the registration of Medina Ventures, LLC., and proceeded to go to the
LinkedIn page of the registered owner, Chris Pederson. There I found a start up venture titled
“Order of the Egonauts.” Upon further investigation, I learned that this venture is a crypto based
project and is tied to the proposed development at the South Meander plot.
Upon even further investigation I learned through the Order of the Egonauts website that from
my understanding it is a crypto mining membership based venture that will use the proposed
Medina event venue as a meeting center. As quoted from the website,
“By minting an Egonaut, you become part of the Order of the Egonauts. Your NFT will
act as your membership access to IRL events being annually at a 15,000+ square foot
arts and entertainment venue being constructed as the crown jewel of an 18 acre
development overlooking a wetland in the city of Medina, Minnesota. The venue project
is being spearheaded by Order of the Egonauts founder, Chris Pederson, aka Bill
Spayships a local resident and business owner in the community.”
Also from this website I learned that,
“Egonaut exclusive IRL events will be one-of-a-kind experiences featuring food from
award winning chefs, cocktails made by local mixologists and top tier entertainment
including, but not limited to high profile keynote speakers, musical performances and
educational symposiums. These events will be held at a brand new, crypto friendly
multi-million dollar state-of-the art venue featuring a grand ballroom, botanical
conservatory, private suite areas and a surrounding boardwalk nestled alongside a
protected wetland with water features incorporated throughout.
The facility also plans to incorporate solar on the roof to help power the venue and
crypto mining rigs in the basement, which among its primary proof-of-work purpose,
will also be used to help heat the building in the colder Minnesota months using heat
recapture. Incorporating sustainability components is important for ecological and
economic purposes, but will also be used to showcase how cryptocurrency and
blockchain technology can be part of sustainable design and infrastructure.
Additional membership benefits will include exclusive access to smaller pop-up event
experiences, speak-easy style happy hours and holder only summits and retreats.”
As a resident of the City of Medina and member of the community I feel extremely misled and
lied to. This is a sneaky attempt at creating a personal gain venture that is titled and marketed to
the City of Medina and the people of Medina as a “family place.”
The Egonaut website description of the venue also includes information that has not been
included in the proposals to the city.
In the proposal to the City, there is no mention of the facility including crypto mining rigs in the
basement. These can be massive fire hazards. One of the goals of the City of Medina is to utilize
the staffed and volunteer fire departments to keep the city safe. The City should feel swindled
upon this revelation.
The Egonaut website also contains more information about what the venue will be used for. It
seems as though the uses have already been established and yet that information was not
included in the proposal to the City.
These venue usages also bring a great deal of clarity as to why the proposal wants the four
North Meander homes to be used as short term residences, and in conjunction with the venue.
The community was brought to believe that this was supposed to be a wedding and events
venue, and if approved those residences would be used for the parties included in those events.
Dead wrong. The underlying use of the project is for crypto and it now makes sense why the
proposed developers want to use those as rentals - they will seek to have crypto miners coming
in from all over the world to use their venue.
Upon this discovery the credibility of Mr. Pederson should be scrutinized. He has either misled
the City of Medina and the community of Medina or he is conducting unethical business and
misleading members of his Egonaut venture.
As a member of the community I have been extremely mislead. The City of Medina has been
misled.
As an owner of property anyone has the right to develop as long as it gains approval. That right
will not change. However, it is in the best interest of the City, the community and everyone else
involved to be as best informed on a matter as possible. It is also in the best interest of all parties
to do business with credible and ethical individuals.
Although I understand that “Order of the Egonauts” is a separate business venture, it is still
related to the proposed Medina development and thus believe the lack of information on the
uses of the development are misleading. Chris Pederson’s LinkedIn profile states that the two
ventures are related and that is why I have made that statement, there has been no assumption.
The misrepresentation of the proposed development in all of the materials provided by Medina
Ventures, LLC. to the City and the community of Medina severely impacts the credibility of the
project and I ask that you take this into great consideration.
Thank you for your time,
Emma Schifferle
St. Thomas School of Law
J.D. Candidate 2023
Tim Newgard and Terri Schifferle
4115 Cavanaugh Dr
Medina, MN
November 9th, 2022
City of Medina
Medina City Hall
2052 County Road 24
Hamel, MN 55340
To whom it may concern,
As a representative of the Medina community and a resident of the City of Medina I am writing
to share my thoughts on the proposed development near Meander Road. I have done so in
commentary of various documents related to the project and to the goals of the city. I have
also included personal commentary on the proposal as a whole. Please see below.
Notes on the Planning Commission Report:
Four Homes North of Meander
In the Planning Commission Report: “The applicant has requested approval to utilize the homes
as lodging units. The City’s residential districts would anticipate each unit being utilized as a
dwelling by a single family. The applicant requests flexibility for each unit to be occupied by
groups that may not necessarily be a single family as described by code and acknowledges that
occupancy may be on a short-term basis. The homes could often be used in connection with
the venue.”
The idea that these homes will be use on a short-term basis is a huge red flag to the owners of
the homes who’s back doors face the proposed residential development site. Having residential
‘homes’ that will have a revolving door of occupants is concerning on many levels as it relates to
the quiet enjoyment of those properties. For example, if the dwellings are being used for
wedding parties (tied to the venue) it would be reasonable to anticipate many cars, and loud
nights, especially in the warmer months.
The Planning Commission Report also mentions the residential architectural design of those
proposed properties. That design does not match the homes in Fields of Media West or the new
Lennar townhomes in the slightest. Although it is proposed to match that of the commercial
development, it is across the street and creates an eyesore when compared to the other living
dwellings it will be near.
Another question that comes to mind - are these homes part of any association? Who will run
them? Maintain them? If they are not to be sold as single family real estate more these
questions are raised.
If these homes are not to fit in with the other homes of Fields of Media West - why are they
necessary?
Also, several owners of Fields of Media West homes who border on that property were told in
the sales of their homes that the land behind them was protected wetland and not developable,
and now the factual basis of that seems to be under fire.
1
Wetlands
From the Planning Commission Report: “The applicant is not proposing wetland impacts within
their development site, but construction of turn lanes and the trail to support the development
would necessitate 0.13 acre of wetlands impacts. Staff recommends a condition that any
approval be subject to approval and implementation of a wetland replacement plan.”
It seems incorrect to propose that these developments will not impact the wetland. There is a
ton of wildlife both in the proposed commercial site, proposed residential area, and surrounding
both that any development would be a disruption.
The largest question is why more wetlands need to be destroyed?
This also ties into the tree preservation aspect of the project. It again seems extremely
unnecessary to take down more trees in Medina especially considering the amount of trees that
have been taken in recent years due to residential projects.
Impacts on Meander Road
Meander is currently a quiet residential street that serves several neighborhoods. Adding
commercial development will drastically change the use of Meander Road both from the East
and West entrances. Specifically, the daily traffic that a daycare, restaurant and retail would
create interferes with the enjoyment of any residential property that is near Meander Road.
This is especially a concern on the East entrance of Meander Road. The left turn lane can get
busy at times when residents are coming home after work. To add in the cars that a daycare
would create would make that turn unbearable and a burden to those who’s homes are there.
Also worth noting, Meander does not currently have street lights. It can be difficult to see
especially in times of daylight savings, and especially when the darkness is paired with rain. I do
not see any proposal or plan to add in street lights. This is likely because those lights would be
far too bight inside of the homes that are near the road. This should be an indication that
increased traffic in the area should be avoided at all costs.
Notes on the Community Vision of Medina:
Medina is a community united by a common goal: to sustain and enhance the quality of life of
its residents. Medina will protect its significant natural resources and open space throughout
the City, while honoring its rural heritage and fostering safe and well-designed neighborhoods,
places of recreation and destinations for citizens to gather. Development within the City will be
commensurate with available transportation systems, municipal services and school capacity.
This commercial and residential proposal does not sustain the quality of life of the residents of
Fields of Medina West, and it certainly does not enhance it. Not all of the residents have a need
for a daycare, or restaurant or retail for that matter. Adding another event center less than a mile
from both the Medina Entertainment Center and Medina Country Club also does not enhance as
2
those venues are already accessible. This commercial proposal also does not offer any honor to
the rural heritage of Medina, if anything it destroys what little of that rural heritage is still
physically left.
Notes on the Community Goals of Medina:
1.Preserve rural vistas, open spaces, and wetlands in all parts of the community to promote
the rural character of Medina.
- This commercial proposal quite literally does the opposite of this. What’s left of the wetland in
that area will be severely compromised as it relates to the wildlife in the area. This is an
opportunity for Medina to disapprove the proposal and work towards preserving the rural vistas
and open spaces that are left in the city.
2. Protect and enhance the environment and natural resources throughout the community.
- This commercial proposal also does not protect or enhance the natural resources that are in
those wetlands and open space - it destroys them.
4. Expand urban services only as necessary to accommodate regionally forecasted residential
growth, desired business opportunities and achievement of other Community Goals. Such
development and growth shall be at a sustainable pace proportionate with capacity of schools
and transportation, water supply and wastewater infrastructure available to the City.
- This commercial plan is unnecessary to achieve any of these goals. There is already office
space on the east entrance of Meander that is considered commercial development. There are
many daycares near the proposed site already. There is retail space just down Hwy. 55 near
Target. And there are restaurants in the area that support the area already.
6. Promote public and private gathering places and civic events that serve the entire
community.
- Depending on cost of an event in a brand new space, this may be unrealistic to properly serve
the community as cost may be a barrier to the space.
7. Preserve and expand trails and parks to provide community recreational facilities, connect
neighborhoods, and encourage healthy lifestyles of its residents.
- This proposal does not mention any trails, and also states that it will likely not connect to
proposed trail development nearby.
8. Provide opportunities for a diversity of housing at a range of costs to support residents at all
stages of their lives.
- The residential aspect of this proposal will obviously be brand new and very “aesthetic.” In the
current housing and residential rental market I see no argument where this can be considered
any range of cost other than at the very top end of the spectrum. This is not realistic in today’s
3
market and does not enhance the City of Medina as the possible residents of those spaces are
not in the majority of those searching for housing at this time.
9. Encourage an attractive, vibrant business community that complements the residential
areas of the City.
- The aesthetics and architecture of this development look nothing like the surrounding offices,
homes, townhomes, and parks nearby. Thus, it does not compliment the residential areas of the
City.
Notes on the Project Narrative:
Medina Ventures, LLC
-It would be great to know more about who comprises this LLC and why. It would also be great
to know what construction company, if any, they have to develop the project.
Intent of Meander Park and Boardwalk
-To provide a walkable, aesthetically pleasing entertainment and relaxation destination that
incorporates the natural beauty of the land while providing access to desirable amenities that
benefit nearby residents of Medina as well as other surrounding communities.
-This proposed development does not accomplish this intent. The amenities proposed are not
desirable to the area. Medina already has a commercial retail hub near Hwy. 55 and 101 and
thus if Medina was to approve more commercial development it should be closer to those
areas.
-There is nothing in the documentation of this project that details how it would be relaxing to
anyone, weddings and events are not relaxing, daycares are not relaxing. Realistically this
project would be a great stress to the residents living nearest to the development.
Green Space, Ponding and Plaza Water Features
-The project narrative states that water features and ponds will be implemented to “dampen
nearby highway sounds.” This is beyond incorrect. On 7 acres of land there is likely no
amount of rushing water that will be able to mask the sounds of not only the highway, but also
the train that sounds several times an hour.
The Venue
-This is the only desirable portion of the proposed development. However, the City should
consider why it is necessary with the Medina Entertainment Center and Medina Country Club
so close nearby. The City should also consider the likelihood that it will be utilized with the
location constraints placed on it such as the sound of the train, sound of the highway, and
lack of aesthetically pleasing land on all sides I.e. homes, highway, offices, etc.
-It would also be great to know which catering company has agreed to partner with this venue,
if any.
4
Other Notes as a Representative of the Medina Community and Fields of Medina
Neighborhood:
Irrigation
-This project encompasses a ton of landscape. This means that landscape will need to be
maintained. As of this past summer, the sprinklers at 4115 Cavanaugh and other homes did
not work on a consistent basis, if at all. This raises large concerns for what that would look
like in commercial development. It is already a concern that Fields of Medina West gets their
water from a nearby pond as this is a great disturbance to wildlife in the area.
The Venue
-This is the only aspect of the project that makes any sense. It would be best that the City of
Medina only approve this part of the project and look to preserve more trees and wetland in
the area with the change in project size.
The Restaurant
-It sounds as though the Project Narrative is expecting a high class restaurant to take the
space. That again sounds ridiculous, especially in the current commercial real estate market.
New development is going to carry a high monthly rent and thus the places that will be willing
to take that on are going to be well established companies such as Applebee’s, Starbucks,
etc. I don’t think this enhances the area in the slightest. This argument also applies to the
retail spaces, see below.
The Retail Spaces
-As I mentioned above, brand new retail space is very expensive. The Project Narrative
suggests that families will be able to enjoy an ice cream cone on the boardwalk together
during the summertime. I would be incredibly shocked to find an ice cream shop that can
afford brand new construction and be able to stay in business in that area. The surrounding
area of this proposed development is filled with offices and thus I would anticipate those new
spaces being filled with real estate companies, maybe a chiropractor, a dentist of some sort,
maybe a small optical shop — if that. It would be interesting to seek out interest if the project
was to go through before approval, as unfilled retail would be an eyesore to the community.
The Daycare
-This is perhaps the most unnecessary aspect to this proposal for 3 main reasons.
-1. There are MANY daycares already in the area. Such as the Goddard School of Medina,
Rush Creek Kindercare, Bamboo, Goddard School of Plymouth, Bloom Child Care,
Primrose West Plymouth, New Creations Child Care, Rockford Road Kindercare, New
Horizon, Little Newtons, and others. This development would eventually need to find an
operator that will take on the competition of the other places and fill the space. This will be
a hard find in the future.
5
-2. Meander Road is not set up to handle the influx of morning and afternoon traffic related
to a daycare. The traffic would also disrupt the enjoyment of the properties that are near
the daycare. Meander and Cavanaugh Drive are already busy in the mornings. For
example, a resident of Cavanaugh Dr. reports having to wait an additional 15 minutes to
get out of the neighborhood before work some mornings due to the school busses coming
though and driving restrains those create. Adding constant traffic will be a burden to those
homeowners.
-3. The daycare in specific is a personal benefit build for one of the members of the project
proposal. Realistically by the time the daycare is built, an operator is found, and it is
actually in business, the children of that member will not need daycare anymore as they
will be in school. Building a daycare for a personal gain and benefit is not aligned with the
goals of the City of Medina.
The “Homes”
-“Homes” as it seems these will be a revolving door of rentals. This is by far the most
disappointing aspect of the project. It seems obvious that Medina Ventures, LLC is trying to
get some money out of the small plot of land North of Meander and then ditch the area as
soon as it sells. There is no need for those homes in the area. If Medina Ventures, LLC wants
to develop homes they should reimagine their plans and create a neighborhood community
South of Meander and leave the North plot vacant. This idea would support the wetlands and
wildlife instead of hindering.
-Also, if this is a commercial proposal, why is there residential included? The “homes” severely
muddy the water of what this project is supposed to be.
The Wetlands and the Wildlife
- As a resident of a home who’s back door faces the proposed residential homes, this is the
wildlife that can be seen on a daily basis. Many types of birds, chipmunks, rabbits, deer,
squirrels, and several others on an occasional basis. The proposed development area is all
these animals have left to live. The trees that will be cut down will destroy homes of the squirrels
and birds. The digging that the project requires will destroy the homes and lives of the
chipmunks, rabbits and deer.
The Surrounding Areas
-This project looks great on paper. However, when you go stand at the proposed site and look
around the project plans do not seem to fit in with the community at all. The area is all
residential with a few large office buildings that are primarily out of sight of the homes. Most
alarming, the residential homes already existing look nothing like those proposed in this
project.
-This proposal also has the potential to tank the values of the homes nearby. Commercial
development should always be done in a way that enhances the area and adds value. This
project as written does not do that. If the project was amended to only include the venue and
landscape the potential for enhancement would be far greater than it is with retail, daycare,
“homes” and restaurant included.
6
Recommendations as a Resident of the Area
1.Ideally, this should be Residential
Based off of the surrounding areas to the proposed development South of Meander
Road, that area should have been zoned residential. This would serve the community far
more and would not create unnecessary burdens on the current residents in the area.
2.Of the Proposal, Allow the Event Venue
If anything in this proposal is granted, it should be the event venue. This would not
create a daily burden to the residents of the neighborhoods near Meander Road.
Although it would create competition between the venue at Medina Country Club and
Medina Entertainment Center, the owners of the land have a right to develop and thus
the City should allow the option that impacts the surrounding residents the least
negatively.
3.Cut Down Less Trees, Preserve More
If the proposal is amended to only include the event venue, the City should require less
trees and wetland to be impacted. Based off the renderings there should be a way to
locate the venue in a spot on the property that preserves the most natural landscape and
wildlife.
4.Do Not Approve the Homes
The four homes North of Meander should not be approved. These create a huge,
unnecessary burden on the homes on the West side of Cavanaugh Dr. These homes do
not enhance the community and if anything will create a foreseeable disturbance.
5.Do Not Approve the Restaurant, Retail or Daycare
The retail space, restaurant and daycare should not be approved as they again create
an unnecessary burden on all of the homes that border Meander Road. Those proposed
developments also create unnecessary stress on the traffic of Meander Road and
interfere with the enjoyment of the properties that are near Meander Road. These
proposals also do not enhance the area and instead have potential to decrease the
value of the area as a whole.
This project should not be approved as it currently stands.
Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter.
Respectfully,
Tim Newgard & Terri Schifferle
4115 Cavanaugh Dr
Medina, MN
Emma Schifferle
St. Thomas School of Law
J.D. Candidate 2023
7
1
Dusty Finke
From:Aaron Decker <aaronjdecker@yahoo.com>
Sent:Tuesday, November 8, 2022 9:19 PM
To:Dusty Finke
Subject:Meander Park and Boardwalk Development
Solution Builders ‐ ThnAir
Warning: Sender aaronjdecker@yahoo.com has never sent any emails to your organization.
Please be careful before replying or clicking on the URLs.
Report Phishing Mark Safe
powered by Graphus®
Hi Dusty,
My name is Aaron Decker and I live at 4155 Fescue Dr in Medina. I’m reaching out tonight in support of the meander
park and boardwalk development project.
I’m excited to see what could lie ahead and become another great destination in Medina. I think there’s a lack of these
types of options here and this could fill a nice gap in the community.
Thanks for your time!
Aaron Decker
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
1
Dusty Finke
From:Seth Finck <redseth@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, November 8, 2022 9:22 PM
To:Dusty Finke
Subject:Meander Park and Boardwalk
Greetings,
I live in Medina at 1157 Jubert Trail, near the proposed new Meander Park and Boardwalk development. It is my
understanding we are currently in a window of open public comment regarding the development so I would like to share
that I fully support the new development and I believe that it will provide homeowners in the area easy access to a
variety of different amenities and businesses. Thanks for listening and all the work you do for the city and community.
Seth Finck
1
Dusty Finke
From:Andy Gagnon <gagnon006@gmail.com>
Sent:Wednesday, November 9, 2022 7:30 AM
To:Scott Johnson; Dusty Finke
Subject:Meander Park and Boardwalk
I want to voice my support for the project. It will add to our city in a positive way, after reviewing the plans.
Andy Gagnon
4151 Prairie View Trail, Medina
1
Dusty Finke
From:Nick Novak <nnovak@northlandsecurities.com>
Sent:Tuesday, November 8, 2022 9:35 PM
To:Dusty Finke; Scott Johnson
Subject:Meander Park and Boardwalk
Hi Dusty,
I just wanted to write to you to voice my support for the Meander Park and Boardwalk project being proposed by Chris
Pederson in Medina. I think it would be a great addition for Medina to have an added community gathering and event
space. I have known Chris to be very ambitious, hard working, and of high integrity. I hope that you will seriously
consider his proposal.
Nicholas Novak
4110 Wild Meadows Drive
Medina, MN 54340
Get Outlook for iOS
Northland Securities does not accept buy, sell, or cancel orders by email, or any instructions by email that would require your signature. Please use the links below
for important disclosures regarding electronic communications with Northland Securities and its related companies.
EMail Disclaimer | Unsubscribe | Firm Information
Member FINRA, MSRB, and SIPC
www.northlandsecurities.com
1
Dusty Finke
From:Gavin Salsbery <gsalsbery@summitsalon.com>
Sent:Tuesday, November 8, 2022 10:21 PM
To:Dusty Finke
Subject:Meander Park Boardwalk Development
Dusty,
I hope your doing well. I just wanted to share my thoughts and support for the Meander Park Boardwalk
Development. As a resident in the Fields of Medina and a business owner of Urban Eve, this is good for Medina and our
neighboring area. Chris has shared with me his vision to have a unique upscale event experience location as well as
retail/service opportunities. Aesthetically, it will significantly enhance the northeast corner of 55 and Arrowhead. The
hardscape features and overall design concept will be market leading. I support it and give it a thumbs!
Take care,
Gavin
Gavin E. Salsbery
1081 Jubert Trail
Medina, MN 55340
Gavin E. Salsbery
Summit Salon Business Center
Shareholder, West Coast Regional Leader, Consultant
765.438.6484
1
Dusty Finke
From:Billy Wiberg <billy.wiberg@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, November 8, 2022 9:20 PM
To:Dusty Finke
Subject:Meander Boardwalk
My name is William Wiberg and I live at 4172 Cavanaugh Drive, Medina, MN 55340. I’m emailing to voice my support for
the Meander Park and Boardwalk Development being proposed. As someone who lives in the Fields of Medina West
neighborhood, I believe the amenities proposed such as a restaurant and event venue will be appreciated by my young
family, and friends, and also support the local economy through the jobs and additional tax base it provides.
Thank you,
William Wiberg
Sent from my iPhone
Regarding the Meander Park & Boardwalk Project
We the surrounding neighbor's of this proposal are generally in approval of the project south side
development proposal, but however we vigorously object to the type of usage being proposed for
these short term villa rentals.
The original concept plan proposed only three lots for villas on the northside guest villas for short
term leases day to day are not in keeping with preserving our current peaceful environment,
tranquility, and a totally different zoning than what we all have.
Current Northern Parcel Plan Concerns
*A New owner short term renters do not keep home in great conditions.
4. This usage depreciates our home values.
• Guest usages after conventions and weddings may lead to after party and late night
activities that are not acceptable to neighbors.
+: Short term rental villas are impossible to properly manage.
4• The large rooftop terraces lead to overcrowding and noise.
@• Potential safety risks with attendees crossing Meander Road during the evenings.
As a result of George W. Stickney and a very concerned Cavonaugh Dr neighbor shared concepts
presented the developer staff and planning commission member discussed other options for
continuance of their application that were generally acceptable to George Stickney and the
Cavanaugh Dr. neighbor in opposition to the initial proposal.
North Parcel New Applications Changes Discussed
o'* Single family owner occupied for sale villa units only. Villas to be either lot sites or to be
built sites.
+ Strong covenants and restrictions allowing only 1+ year leases on any villa only if needed.
a� No leases, less than lyr and of course short term leases for convention and wedding
attendees.
t� Four newly platted lots with their own PTD's, etc.
m Moving the guest villas or quarters to the south parcel, closer to where the venues are and
farther away from all of us.
Lit4SLI -1(.3.
r* 1 mk) 5 y
der
a k wee
Date
/1. 9. 22
Name
Address 1Igz /ZRO
Signatur for ap al of
Date
Name
Address
Signature for approval of this placement.
Date
Name
Address
Signature for approval of this placement.
Date
Name
Address
Signature for approval of this placement.
Date
Name
Address
Signature for approval of this placement.
Date
Name
Address
Signature for approval of this placement.
Date
Name
Address
Signature for approval of this placement.
Date
Name
Address
Signature for approval of this placement.
Date
Name
Address
Signature for approval of this placement.
Date
Name f f
l
Address (7r/
G(<<tq SS -2
Signature for approval of placement
Date
/1 f
Name
Address
Signature for approval of this placement.
Date
Name
Address
Signature for approval of this placement.
Date
Name
Address
Signature for approval of this placement.
Date
Name
Address
Signature for approval of this placement.
Date
Name
Address
Signature for approval of this placement.
Date
Name Name
Address Address
Signature for approval of this placement. Signature for approval of this placement.
Date Date
Name
Address
Signature for approval of this placement.
Date
Name
Address
Signature for approval of this placement.
Date
LEGAL
BLOCK 2
LOT 3
BLOCK 3
LOT 1
LOT 2
LOT 3
LOT 4
LOT 5
LOT 6
LOT 7
LOT 8
LOT 9
LOT10
LOT 11
LOT 12
LOT 13
LOT 14
LOT 15
BLOCK 4
LOT 1
BLOCK 5
Marsh Pointe
Preserve
1582 Marsh Pointe Court
1578 Marsh Pointe Court
1574 Marsh Pointe Court
1597 Marsh Pointe Court
1595 Marsh Pointe Court
1593 Marsh Pointe Court
1591 Marsh Pointe Court
1589 Marsh Pointe Court
1587 Marsh Pointe Court 0-
1585 Marsh Pointe Court
1583 Marsh Pointe Court
1581 Marsh Pointe Court
1579 Marsh Pointe Court
1577 Marsh Pointe Court
1575 Marsh Pointe Court
1573 Marsh Pointe Court
1571 Marsh Pointe Court
1569 Marsh Pointe Court
1551 Marsh Pointe Court
PID #
' rJ
CL s
Chapter 2 – Vision and Community Goals Page 2 - 1
Adopted October 2, 2018
Chapter 2: VISION & COMMUNITY GOALS
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
The Vision and Community Goals chapter is the heart of the Comprehensive Plan and provides
the foundation from which City officials make consistent and supporting land use decisions.
This chapter includes a set of general community goals that guided the creation of this Plan.
The concepts in this chapter are some of the few static elements of the Comprehensive Plan. If
land uses change or other infrastructure varies from the Plan, decisions will be founded in the
goals set forth below. The Vision and Goals were created with the involvement of the
Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee (the “Steering Committee”), City officials, and
residents of Medina and are broadly supported.
Land use designations are subject to strong social and economic pressures to change.
Accordingly, it is appropriate that such systems be periodically evaluated in light of changing
social and economic conditions. As development evolves, the Vision and Goals will provide the
guidance for accomplishing the vision for the future of the community even when changes are
necessary to the land use plan.
Detailed objectives and recommendations are contained within each of the subject chapters of
this plan.
Creating the Vision and Goals
The residents, the Steering Committee, City officials and staff participated in the planning
process for the Plan. A series of public participation meetings were conducted to introduce and
solicit information from the residents of Medina. The Steering Committee held work sessions
that focused on integrating the concerns and desires of the community together with
accommodating growth and regional impacts. An online forum provided additional
opportunity for residents to impact the Vision and Community Goals as they were formulated.
In addition to land use and growth planning, the City implemented open space, natural
resources, and infrastructure planning. The goals which guided this process are integrated into
this chapter.
Each element of this plan was developed with assistance from city officials and a diverse group
of community stakeholders producing a truly representative plan. The City made a conscious
decision to emphasize natural resources and open space conservation.
Chapter 2 – Vision and Community Goals Page 2 - 2
Adopted October 2, 2018
Community Vision
The following statement provides a vision of the community for the future and the resultant
goals and strategies.
Medina is a community united by a common goal: to sustain and enhance the quality of life of its
residents. Medina will protect its significant natural resources and open space throughout the City,
while honoring its rural heritage and fostering safe and well-designed neighborhoods, places of recreation
and destinations for citizens to gather. Development within the City will be commensurate with available
transportation systems, municipal services and school capacity.
Community Goals
The following Community Goals are derived from the Vision Statement and inform objectives
and strategies throughout the various aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
• Preserve rural vistas, open spaces, and wetlands in all parts of the community to
promote the rural character of Medina.
• Protect and enhance the environment and natural resources throughout the community.
• Encourage and incent innovative and environmentally friendly approaches to planning,
engineering and development.
• Expand urban services only as necessary to accommodate regionally forecasted
residential growth, desired business opportunities and achievement of other
Community Goals. Such development and growth shall be at a sustainable pace
proportionate with capacity of schools and transportation, water supply and wastewater
infrastructure available to the City.
• Spread development so that it is not geographically concentrated during particular
timeframes.
• Promote public and private gathering places and civic events that serve the entire
community.
• Preserve and expand trails and parks to provide community recreational facilities,
connect neighborhoods, and encourage healthy lifestyles of its residents.
• Provide opportunities for a diversity of housing at a range of costs to support residents
at all stages of their lives.
• Encourage an attractive, vibrant business community that complements the residential
areas of the City.
• Maintain its commitment to public safety through support of the City’s police
department and coordinate with its contracted volunteer fire departments.
• Manage the City through prudent budgeting processes, retaining a skilled and efficient
staff and long-range planning and financial management.
Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 4
Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 4
While these ordinance standards help protect solar access, it is not possible for every part of a
building or lot to obtain unobstructed solar access. Mature trees, topography, and the location
of structures can limit solar access. However, on most properties the rooftop of the principal
building would be free of shading by adjacent structures. Therefore, the majority of property
owners in the City could utilize solar energy systems, if they so desired, as a supplement or
alternative to conventional fuels.
HHiissttoorriicc PPrreesseerrvvaattiioonn
The City of Medina currently does not have any sites or structures listed on the National
Register of Historic Places. The City of Medina has a strong interest in preserving
representative portions of its history. The City previously worked with the West Hennepin
Pioneer Museum to restore the Wolsfeld Family cabin which was originally built in 1856. It is
thought to be one of the original homes in Medina. The City further commits to providing the
following general guidelines related to historical preservation:
• Partner with organizations that want to preserve historically significant areas, landmarks,
and buildings in Medina;
• Modify zoning regulations as necessary to help preserve areas that may be historically
significant.
FFuuttuurree GGeenneerraall LLaanndd UUssee PPoolliiccyy DDiirreeccttiioonn
As described in the Vision Statement, the City of Medina strives to promote and protect its open
spaces and natural environment. The City has historically been, and intends to continue to be,
primarily a rural community.
The City has planned for a limited amount of future development consistent with regional
forecast and consistent with Community Goals.
Future Land Use Plan Principles
The Future Land Use Plan guides the development of Medina through 2040, and will be used to
implement the City’s goals, strategies and policies. The Plan is guided by the Vision and
Community Goals as furthered by the following principles:
Development Patterns and Neighborhood Form
• Encourage open spaces, parks and trails in all neighborhood developments. Surveys
indicate that a high quality of life is found when residents have visual access to green
spaces.
• Create neighborhoods with a variety of housing types that are well connected with
roads, trails or sidewalks.
• Maintain the integrity of rural neighborhoods and promote development patterns
consistent with existing rural residential development.
• Recognize neighborhood characteristics and promote new development compatible in
scale, architectural quality and style with existing neighborhoods.
• Stage residential growth to minimize the amount of adjacent developments which
occur within the same time period.
Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 5
Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 5
• Guide density to areas with proximity to existing infrastructure and future
infrastructure availability.
• Concentrate higher density development near service oriented businesses to help
promote walkability.
• Consider planned development in surrounding communities when making land use
decisions in the City.
Road Patterns
• Recognize regional highway capacity and planned improvements, along with use
forecasts, as major factors in planning for growth and land use changes.
• Establish collector streets with good connections through the community’s growth
areas.
• Promote trails and sidewalk access near roads and thoroughfares to encourage multi-
modal transportation choices.
• Consider opportunities to improve north-south travel within the City.
Open Spaces and Natural Resources
• Preserve natural resources throughout the community and provide educational
opportunities to residents to help them understand the value of natural areas.
• Preserve open spaces and natural resources.
• Protect wooded areas and encourage improvement of existing resources and
reforestation. Evaluate existing woodland protections and supplement as necessary.
• Support the guidelines identified in the Open Space Report to preserve the City’s
natural systems.
Business Districts and Commercial Areas
• Focus service businesses and development near urban residential densities and along
primary transportation corridors.
• Provide connections between residents and commercial areas and promote businesses
within mixed-use areas.
• Work to create job opportunities in the community for Medina residents to reduce
traffic and commuting demands.
• Emphasize service and retail uses which serve the needs of the local community and
provide opportunities for the community to gather.
• Support business development with a corporate campus style which provides open
spaces and protects natural resources.
Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 6
Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 6
TThhee GGuuiiddee PPllaann
Medina's Future Land Use Plan, Map 5-3, maintains Medina’s rural character and protects the
City's natural resources while accommodating limited growth and development which is
consistent with the City’s Vision, Community Goals and Land Use Principles.
Table 5-2 below demonstrates the expected 2040 land uses in the community.
TABLE 5-2
FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
Future Land Use (2040) Gross
Acreage % Net
Acreage %
Rural Residential 8,402.2 49.1% 6,015.3 35.1%
Agriculture 222.7 1.3% 174.5 1.0%
Future Development Area 671.9 3.9% 547.9 3.2%
Low Density Residential 1172.5 6.8% 865.7 5.1%
Medium Density Residential 58.5 0.3% 46.2 0.3%
High Density Residential 29.6 0.2% 25.7 0.2%
Mixed Residential 137.1 0.8% 94.1 0.6%
Uptown Hamel 45.0 0.3% 41.2 0.2%
Commercial 254.2 1.5% 197.6 1.2%
Business 704.6 4.1% 471.9 2.8%
Rural Commercial 67.5 0.4% 47.6 0.3%
Institutional 270.2 1.6% 194.0 1.1%
Parks, Recreation, Open Space 2,771.5 16.2% 1,971.2 11.5%
Private Recreation 343.1 2.0% 297.5 1.7%
Closed Sanitary Landfill 192.2 1.1% 124.7 0.7%
Right-of-Way 673.1 3.9% 616.9 3.6%
Total Acres 16,015.9 11,732.0
Lakes and Open Water* 1,104.6 6.5% 1,104.6 6.5%
Wetlands and Floodplain 4,283.9 25.0%
Total City 17,120.5 17,120.5
* Lakes and Open Water amounts include areas adjacent to lakes which are not included in
Hennepin County parcel data and exclude un-meandered lakes.
The Growth and Development Map (Map 5-4) highlights areas within the City in which a change
of land use is contemplated by the Future Land Use plan. The map also highlights wetland areas
within Medina which significantly affect land planning, development, and infrastructure
decisions.
Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 7
Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 7
Future Land Use Designations
Rural Residential (RR) identifies areas for low-intensity uses, such as rural residential, hobby
farms, agricultural, horticulture, conservation of ecologically significant natural resources and
passive recreation. Density within the RR land use shall be no more than one lot per 10 acres
and the area is not planned to be served by urban services during the timeframe covered by this
Plan.
Agricultural (AG) identifies areas which are planned for long-term agricultural uses. Density
within the land use can be no more than one lot per 40 acres which will not be served by urban
services. Property within this land use is eligible to be part of the Metropolitan Agricultural
Preserves Program.
Future Development Area (FDA) identifies areas which could potentially be planned for future
urban development in the City that will be provided municipal sewer and water services. This
area will remain rural unless and until designated for urban services in a future Comprehensive
Plan update. The purpose of the FDA designation is to communicate the future planning
intentions to the community. This designation is tentative and depends greatly on future
infrastructure improvements, including to regional highway capacity.
Low Density Residential (LDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 2.0 units
per acre and 3.0.units per acre which are served, or are intended to be served, by urban
services. The primary use in this area is single- and two-family residential development.
Medium Density Residential (MDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 5.0
and 7.0 units per acre that are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The
primary uses in this designation will be a mix of housing such as single-family residential, twin
homes, town homes, row homes, and small multiple family buildings.
High Density Residential (HDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 12.0 and
15.0 units per acre that are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The primary
uses will include town homes, apartment buildings and condominiums which should
incorporate some open space or an active park.
Mixed Residential (MR) identifies residential land uses that may be developed with a variety
of housing styles at an overall average density between 3.5 and 4.0 units per net acre, within
which a minimum of the units equivalent to 1.0 unit per acre are required to be developed at
higher densities above 8.0 units per acre. Uses within the MR land use are served, or are
intended to be served, by urban services. The land use provides flexibility for the type of
housing to be developed, including detached single family, twin homes, townhomes and
multiple family buildings. The MR land use will allow for different types of housing to be
developed in coordination with each other or independently, provided the objectives related to
overall density and minimum number of higher density housing units can be achieved within a
defined area.
Uptown Hamel (UH) the Uptown Hamel land use allows residential and commercial uses to be
mixed on adjacent sites and to be mixed within the same building or property. Residential
development in this designation may be between 4.0 and 15.0 units per acre. The Uptown
Hamel area is served by urban services.
Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 8
Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 8
Commercial (C) provides areas for highway oriented businesses and retail establishments
including commercial, office and retail uses. These uses are concentrated along the arterial
corridors and are served or will be served by urban services.
Business (B) provides opportunities for corporate campus uses including office, warehouse,
and light industrial. This designation identifies larger tracts of land that are suitable for office
and business park developments and are served or will be served by urban services.
Rural Commercial (RC) identifies commercial land uses which are not served by urban services,
but rather by individual wells and septic systems. The scale of development in this land use shall
be limited to protect water resources.
Institutional (INST) identifies existing public, semi-public, and non-profit uses such as
governmental, cemeteries, religious, educational and utilities.
Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) identifies publicly owned or permanently conserved
land which is used for park, recreational, or open space purposes.
Private Recreation (PREC) identifies areas that are currently used for outdoor recreational uses
which are held under private ownership but are not publicly maintained. Limited numbers of
residential uses may be included or have previously been developed within this land use
designation, accounting for no more than 10% of the land area. Density within the residential
portion of the use shall be between 2.0 and 3.0 units per net acre where urban services are
available and one unit per 10 acres where services are not available. The City does not
anticipate additional residential development within the land use.
Closed Sanitary Landfill (SL) identifies an existing closed sanitary landfill. The Woodlake
Landfill is owned by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) as part of Minnesota’s
Closed Landfill Program. The MPCA has jurisdiction over land use regulations of the landfill
and has made available a description of the types, locations, and potential movement of
hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants, or decomposition gases related to the
facility in its Closed Landfill Plan. The City hereby incorporates such information and the City
will provide such information as required by law.
Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 13
Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 13
UUrrbbaann SSeerrvviiccee DDeessiiggnnaattiioonnss
The Urban Service Area includes the residential and commercial areas of the City that are
currently or will be served by municipal water and sewer services.
Residential Uses
Objectives:
1. Require preservation of natural slopes, wetlands, woodlands, and other significant
natural characteristics of the property.
2. Consider exceptions to or modifications of density restrictions for developments that
protect the natural features or exceed other standards of the zoning district. Such
modification shall generally not exceed -10% of the minimum density or +20% of the
maximum density requirement of the relevant land use.
3. Restrict urban development to properties within the sewer service boundary.
4. Regulate land within the Mixed Residential land use to provide opportunities for
residential development with a density in excess of 8 units/acre. Flexibility is
purposefully provided within the land use to support opportunities for a single project to
provide both low- and high- density housing or for multiple developers to partner on
independent projects within a Mixed Residential area.
5. Encourage green building practices such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design (LEED) principles in neighborhood planning and residential building and low
impact development design standards.
6. Regulate the rate and location of development in keeping with availability of public
facilities and the City's stated goals, including the undesignated MUSA and growth
strategies.
7. Restrict commercial and business development to areas designated in this Plan.
8. Protect property within the City's MUSA boundary from development prior to the
provision of urban services that will hinder future division.
9. Create flexible zoning standards that would allow for innovative arrangements of homes,
conservation easements, or other creative land use concepts that preserve the City's open
space and natural features.
10. Promote attractive, well-maintained dwellings on functional, clearly marked roads, with
adequate facilities and open space.
11. Emphasize resident and pedestrian safety.
12. Encourage a controlled mix of densities, housing types, age groups, economic levels, lot
sizes, and living styles that are of appropriate scale and consistent with appropriate land
use, market demands, and development standards.
13. Establish design criteria for platting and developing site plans which will be compatible
with surrounding physical features, existing land uses and the preservation of
Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 14
Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 14
ecologically significant natural resources.
14. Establish standards for higher density residential development so that such development
is compatible with surrounding uses. Such standards may include enclosed parking,
green space, landscape buffering and height limitations.
15. Require utilities to be placed underground wherever possible for reasons of aesthetic
enhancement and safety.
16. Plan interconnections between separate developments to encourage shared road use to
reduce costs and minimize the amount of road surface required.
17. Require planning of trails and walkway systems in the early design stages of all new
development so that residential areas are provided safe access to parks and open space.
18. In urban residential zones with sanitary sewer service permit higher density in PUD’s in
exchange for (1) reduced land coverage by buildings, (2) provision of more multi-family
units; and, (3) sensitive treatment of natural resources.
19. Implement standards for lot sizes and setbacks which recognize the development
characteristics and natural resources of each existing neighborhood.
20. Regulate noise, illumination, and odors as needed to protect residential neighborhoods
and to maintain public health and safety.
Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 16
Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 16
Commercial Uses
The following objectives refer to commercial land uses which will provide a variety of retail
products and services mixed with smaller offices.
Objectives:
1. Require preservation of natural slopes, wetlands, woodlands, and other significant natural
characteristics of the property.
2. Provide convenient and attractive shopping and services to meet the needs of City
residents.
3. Encourage businesses that benefit the local community by providing employment
opportunities offering convenience goods and services, utilizing high quality design, and
having limited impact on public services.
4. Require commercial activities that serve the broader metropolitan market to have access
to a regional highway or frontage road.
5. Regulate the impact of commercial development along the border between commercially
and residentially guided areas to ensure that commercial property has a minimal impact
on residential areas.
6. Regulate construction to ensure high quality, energy and resource efficient buildings and
to promote such Green Building standards as LEED Certifications or the State of
Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines: Buildings, Benchmarks and Beyond (B-3)
standards.
7. Encourage construction that enhances the visual appeal of TH 55 corridor and the rural
vistas and open spaces of the City.
8. Establish standards for the commercial area north of TH 55 at Tamarack Drive which
results in a high quality, walkable and appropriately scaled development which
complements nearby residential neighborhoods, emphasizes goods and services for local
residents over highway users and provides gathering opportunities for the community.
9. Require frontage roads that do not directly access arterial roadways and limit access to
arterial and collector roadways.
10. Limit the scale of commercial development where urban services are not available to
protect water resources and to integrate such uses with surrounding rural lands.
11. Use the site plan review process to ensure that commercial and industrial uses are
compatible with neighboring future and existing uses, and with the adjoining public
streets and highways. PUD’s may be used to help accomplish this policy.
12. Emphasize pedestrian safety.
13. Require utilities to be placed underground wherever possible for reasons of aesthetic
enhancement and safety.
14. Regulate noise, illumination, and odors as needed to maintain public health and safety.
HIGHWAY 55
")55
")24
")19
")101
")116
")11
")24
")19
£¤12
HAMEL RD
MEDINA RD
PIONEER TRL
TAMARACK DR
WILLOW DR
HACKAMORE RD
ARROWHEAD DR
HOMESTEAD TRL
CHIPPEWA RD
HUNTER DR
PARKVIEW DR
BROCKTON LN N
MEANDER RD
EVERGREEN RD
BROCKTON LN N
CHIPPEWA RD
WILLOW DR
WILLOW DR
HUNTER DR
")55
Katrina
Independence
Mooney
School
Peter
Spurzem
Holy Name
Half Moon
Wolsfeld
Krieg
Winterhalter
Miller
Thies
Ardmore
Map 5-3Future Land Use Plan
0 0.5 10.25 Miles
Map Date: October 2, 2018
Legend
Future Land Use
Rural Residential
Agricultural
Future Development Area
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Mixed Residential
Uptown Hamel
Commercial
Business
Rural Commercial
Institutional
Private Recreational
Park, Recreational, and Open Space
Closed Sanitary Landfill
HIGHWAY 55
")55
")24
")19
")101
")116
")11
")24
")19
£¤12
HAMEL RD
MEDINA RD
PIONEER TRL
TAMARACK DR
WILLOW DR
HACKAMORE RD
ARROWHEAD DR
HOMESTEAD TRL
CHIPPEWA RD
HUNTER DR
PARKVIEW DR
BROCKTON LN N
MEANDER RD
EVERGREEN RD
BROCKTON LN N
CHIPPEWA RD
WILLOW DR
WILLOW DR
HUNTER DR
")55
Katrina
Independence
Mooney
School
Peter
Spurzem
Holy Name
Half Moon
Wolsfeld
Krieg
Winterhalter
Miller
Thies
Ardmore
Map 5-4Development and Growth Plan
0 0.5 10.25 Miles
Map Date: October 2, 2018
Legend
Future Land Use
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Mixed Residential
Uptown Hamel
Commercial
Business
Wetland Locations
Wetland Locations
K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2022-09-12 Submittal\2022-09-30 Meander Park & Boardwalk FPrelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx
70
1
X
E
N
I
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
|
SU
I
T
E
3
0
0
| M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
,
M
N
|
55
4
1
6
|
76
3
.
5
4
1
.
4
8
0
0
|
W
S
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
October 5, 2022
Mr. Dusty Finke
City Planning Director
City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340-9790
Re: Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans & Preliminary Plat – Engineering Review
City Project No. LR-21-310
WSB Project No. 019539-000
Dear Mr. Finke:
WSB staff have reviewed the Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans and Preliminary Plat
submittal dated September 9, 2022. The applicant proposes to construct a business park,
boardwalk, recreational amenities, and villa style detached townhomes on a total of 18-acres
located along Meander Road on the north side of TH 55 and east of Arrowhead Drive.
The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina’s general
engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with
regards to engineering and stormwater management matters.
Preliminary Plat & General Comments
1. The City Planner will provide comments pertaining to the proposed landscaping,
sidewalk/trail connectivity/easements, and tree preservation plan under separate cover.
2. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building
structures, cul-de-sacs, and roundabout area as required by the City Fire Marshall. The
Fire Marshall will review and provide comments under separate cover.
3. Provide additional right-of-way along Meander Road to accommodate future right turn
lanes into the applicant’s commercial site and the future commercial site further to the
east that will have an access road opposite Cavanaugh Drive.
4. Provide additional ROW on the north side of Meander Road, 2’ from far edge of trail.
5. A visioning study was completed in August of 2020 that included this development area,
the adjacent commercial development area to the east, and the Tamarack Drive
extension corridor. The study included potential commercial site layouts that indicated
access between commercial parcels. For the primary access drive lane proposed from
Meander Road south and east adjacent to the future “Day Care” location provide cross
access easement agreements to provide flexibility in the connection of the driveway to
future easterly commercial areas.
Consider the reduction of parking spaces along this corridor to minimize conflict points.
See additional comments below within the traffic study section.
6. Provide confirmation that sufficient electrical service is available for the data center use.
City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans & Preliminary Plat – Engineering Review
October 5, 2022
Page 2
K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2022-09-12 Submittal\2022-09-30 Meander Park & Boardwalk FPrelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx
7. In order to calculate a letter of credit and construction engineering escrow amounts for
the final development agreement, an engineer’s estimate (in Excel format) of the
proposed street and utility improvements along with a schedule for completion of
construction will be required. The estimate should also include the cost of landscaping
items.
8. Additional comments have been provided directly on the plan sheets. Not all comments
on the plans have been summarized in this review letter.
Existing Conditions & Demolition Plans (Sheets C1.0 – C1.2)
9. With preliminary plat submittal, provide a removals/demolition plan to show what trees
are proposed to be removed, buildings to be demolished, impacts to Meander Road, etc.
Complete.
10. The existing site and demolition plans will also need to include existing utility pipe sizes,
pipe material types, etc.
Site & Paving Plans (C2.0 – C2.2 & C3.0 – C3.2)
11. Provide a figure showing truck movements throughout the site including the largest truck
(semi-truck) and the largest fire truck. Design driveways and circulation routes to
accommodate these vehicles and required turn around space(s) as required by the City
Fire Marshall.
12. City design standards typically require horizontal and vertical curve lengths to meet a 30
MPH design speed (for the townhome road). Where site constraints do not allow this
standard to be met and the roadway is designated as private, the City will consider
alternative designs where emergency access requirements are met.
13. The proposed private road does not meet City design standards at 20’, refer to City
design standards.
14. Additional Meander Road comments:
a. Meander Road is a State aid street and so State Aid design standards are
necessary.
b. For the proposed improvements along Meander Road, the design standards for
horizontal and vertical curves will need to mee a 40 MPH design speed.
c. Provide a profile view with future submittals that include vertical curve lengths.
Provide alignment data.
d. Lane widths meet state aid standards.
e. Provide confirmation that turn lane length sufficient to accommodate projected
turning movements into the site
f. If this plan will be submitted to MnDOT State Aid there will need to be an SEQ,
earthwork information, and cross sections.
Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control (Sheets C4.0 – C4.4)
15. Provide a more detailed grading and drainage plan with future submittals. With final plat
submittal include drainage arrows on the grading plan showing the direction of flow and
slope percentages.
16. Provide EOF locations for all low points inside and outside the roadway.
City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans & Preliminary Plat – Engineering Review
October 5, 2022
Page 3
K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2022-09-12 Submittal\2022-09-30 Meander Park & Boardwalk FPrelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx
17. A full review of the erosion/sediment control plan and SWPPP sheets will be completed
with future submittals. Silt fence should be shown around all wetland boundaries.
Redundant perimeter control is required adjacent to wetlands. Provide two layers of silt
fence space 5’ a part.
18. With final plat submittal provide the following
a. In general maintain all surface grades within the minimum of 2% and maximum
33% slopes. Vegetated swale grades shall also be a minimum of 2.0%.
Complete.
b. Drainage arrows on plans showing direction of runoff. Note specifically high
points between each side-yard swale.
c. Include percent slope In all other swale locations and verify that it meets the City
requirement of 2% minimum.
d. The City will require a common draintile collection system (rigid PVC Schedule
40 or SDR 26) for sump pump discharges. A separate foundation pipe system in
addition to the sump discharge system should be considered where full
basements are proposed. The size of the common collection system should be 6”
and comprised of PVC schedule 40 or SDR 26.
e. Add rip-rap quantities and class notes at each flared end section and pond
overflows (if applicable).
f. Note the size of proposed storm sewer structures.
SWPPP (Sheets C4.5 – C4.6)
19. The proposed project will disturb more than one acre. Develop and include a SWPPP
consistent with the MPCA CSWGP with future plan submittals. Complete.
20. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided
with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to
construction commencing.
21. A detailed review of erosion/sediment control and SWPPP will be conducted with the final
plat submittal.
Utility Plans (Sheet C5.0 – C5.4)
General
22. Any public sanitary sewer and watermain shall be encompassed by drainage and utility
easements where located outside of public road right of way. Drainage and utility
easements will need to allow for a 1:1 trench from the invert of the utility with a minimum
of 20’ centered on the utility.
23. Consider routes for the sewer/watermain that utilize the same tranches and/or connect in
similar locations. For example, make the connection with the proposed watermains at the
same location on Meander utilizing a cross instead of separate tees (easterly
connections). Complete.
24. The general location of existing/proposed watermain and sewer were shown on the
concept plan. With future submittals also show the nearest existing hydrants and valve
locations. Label the pipe size and pipe material for existing/proposed watermain and
sanitary sewer. Complete.
25. Add general notes to the utility plans to the effect of:
City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans & Preliminary Plat – Engineering Review
October 5, 2022
Page 4
K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2022-09-12 Submittal\2022-09-30 Meander Park & Boardwalk FPrelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx
a. The City shall not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that are
associated with variations in the utility as-built elevations. All utility connections
shall be verified in the field.
b. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on
the submitted plans. The Owner and Engineer of Record are fully responsible for
changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City’s
standards.
c. All watermain and sanitary sewer testing shall be conducted in accordance with
the City standards and specifications. Copies of all test results shall be submitted
to the City (Public Works Director, City Engineer), the Owner, and the Engineer
of Record.
d. Watermain shall have a minimum cover of 7.5’.
e. Tracer wire installation shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the MN
Rural Water Association Standards. See these standards for further details.
f. The City will require televising for sanitary sewer pipe installations prior to
accepting a warranty for the utility system; provide report and video files to the
City for review.
26. With final plat submittal provide the following:
a. Plan/profile sheets for watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer along the
townhome access road.
a. Provide dimension notes from watermain to parallel sewer mains (storm and
sanitary sewer); the minimum horizontal separation between mains is 10 feet.
Where watermain crosses storm or sanitary sewer, add a note at each location to
the effect of “Maintain 18” Minimum Separation, 4” Rigid Insulation” on both the
plan view and profile view locations (both utility and storm sewer sheets).
b. Show water/sewer service location to each lot and include the curb stop location
at utility easement location (10’ beyond ROW). For each lot location add the low
floor opening elevation, sewer service station from downstream manhole, sewer
service invert elevation at utility easement (10’ beyond ROW), riser height if
applicable, and curb stop elevation.
Watermain
27. Hydrant locations shall be approved of by the Fire Marshal; typically, a maximum of 250’
influence radius (approximately 400’ spacing) is required to serve the immediate
residential areas. Provide an exhibit showing hydrant influence spacing.
28. Watermain looping connections will be needed to minimize long dead-end watermain
sections. Consideration of further watermain looping needs, stubs for future phases, or
other adjacent developments may be required and will be reviewed with future submittals.
With that in mind, at the southeasterly portion of the site, provide an 8-inch stub to extend
east.
29. The watermain connections to the building(s) shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Fire Marshall. Show the location of the PIV (if sprinklered) and curb stop location on the
plan(s). The City requires that domestic and fire services are separate taps from the
main; A separate curb stop is required for the domestic service and gate valve (PIV) for
the fire line.
City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans & Preliminary Plat – Engineering Review
October 5, 2022
Page 5
K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2022-09-12 Submittal\2022-09-30 Meander Park & Boardwalk FPrelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx
Sanitary Sewer
30. Sanitary sewer main extending to the north into the detached townhome development
area will need to be placed as deep as possible to account for future development
connections to the north.
31. The sewer service shown for the Day Care building should be directed downstream. The
City does not allow service to be connected directly to manholes. Sewer main
entering/existing a manhole should have at least a 90 degree separation where possible;
one of the manholes shown with less than a 90 degreed separation. If the existing
watermain stub will not be used, the City will require that it is removed up to the existing
watermain. Complete.
32. With future submittals show proposed sanitary sewer service line invert elevations on
plans; the City requires a minimum depth of 4’ from low floor elevations. A separate
water/sewer service. Complete.
33. Gravity sewer is being proposed to serve all units within the development. The City’s
typical standard is to place sewer a minimum of 10’ below the surface (18” vertical
separation below the watermain). Where this depth is not feasible, the City will allow an 8’
depth; depths less than 8’ will require review on a case-by-case basis.
Storm Sewer
34. With final construction plans, if basements are proposed with the detached townhomes,
the City will require draintile or other connections for sump pump discharges connecting
to the storm sewer system. A separate foundation pipe system in addition to the sump
discharge system should be considered.
35. Storm sewer stubs are shown on the plan, confirm whether these are for roof drains.
Civil Details (Sheets C6.0 – C6.12)
36. The proposed street and pavement sections should be reviewed and designed by a
geotechnical engineer. Provide soil borings and geotechnical report with final plat
submittal.
37. A full review of standard details will be conducted with the final plat submittal.
Stormwater Management
38. The applicant will need to submit a Stormwater Management Plan and modeling
consistent with Medina’s Stormwater Design Manual.
39. The development will need to meet the City’s volume control requirement to capture and
retain onsite 1.1” of runoff from the net new impervious surface. By satisfying the volume
requirement the water quality requirement is considered met. Follow the City’s
Stormwater Design Manual for alternative credits towards the volume requirement if
infiltration is not feasible. Stormwater treatment will be required north of Meander road
before discharging into the wetland. Complete.
40. Water quality control standards are considered satisfied if the volume control standard for
the site has been met. If it is infeasible to meet the volume control standard due to
contaminated soils, site constraints, or other factors, the proposed BMP will need to
detain and treat a sufficient volume of stormwater to achieve a phosphorus load reduction
of 20% from existing conditions using an approved BMP. Complete.
City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans & Preliminary Plat – Engineering Review
October 5, 2022
Page 6
K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2022-09-12 Submittal\2022-09-30 Meander Park & Boardwalk FPrelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx
41. The applicant may want to consider using the stormwater ponds for irrigation. Credits for
volume control can be given for stormwater reuse. City ordinance does not allow for
municipal water system to be used for irrigation. Re-use for irrigation is being proposed,
however the additional credit is not needed to meet the volume control requirements.
42. The development will need to meet the City’s rate control requirement, which states that
post development discharge rates for the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year Atlas 14 MSE 3,
24-hour storm events must be less than or equal to existing conditions discharge rates.
Complete.
43. The City requires two feet of freeboard from structure low openings to 100-year high
water levels and EOF’s. Provide maintenance access to all ponding facilities
a. Provide EOF routes and HWL for the stormwater BMP’s to verify there is suitable
freeboard.
b. Stabilized EOF’s should be provided for all low areas.
44. Include soil borings to verify that is a minimum of 3’ of separation from the bottom of the
filtration basin to the seasonally saturated soils.
45. Provide size, amount, and slope of proposed drain tile within the filtration basin.
46. The development will need to meet the appropriate watershed standards for Elm Creek
Water Management Commission and the applicant shall submit for the required permits.
47. No private storm water facilities may be approved unless a long-term maintenance plan is
submitted that defines how access will be provided, who will conduct the maintenance,
the type of maintenance and the maintenance intervals. The long-term maintenance plan
along with other stormwater maintenance requirements may have been included with the
project development agreement. The applicant shall obtain all necessary easement or
other property interests to allow access to the facilities for inspection or maintenance for
both the responsible party and the City of Medina.
Traffic & Access
48. Based on the proposed site plan the anticipated traffic generation would be
approximately 3,043 daily trips, 326 AM peak hour trips and 266 PM peak hour trips
assuming the uses outlined in the proposed site plan (venue space, daycare, restaurant,
coffee shop, retail space). The proposed access to the site is located on Meander Road
approximately 470 feet west of Cavanaugh Drive and has an acceptable spacing (greater
than 400 feet).
49. Based on the anticipated traffic generation left and right turn lanes should be provided on
Meander Road at the site access for the commercial site to the south. Also, a two lane
northbound approach should be provided on the south site approach to Meander Road
(left / right turn lanes).
a. The site plan includes a left turn lane into the site and the two-lane northbound
approach from the site. The analysis indicates that the eastbound right turn lane
would not be required for capacity. It should also be looked at with respect to
safety utilizing right turn lane warrant criteria.
50. Only one site access is proposed for the commercial area to the south. With the
anticipated traffic generation from the site, consideration of a secondary access in the
easterly direction which can accommodate the future development area to the east of the
site should be considered. The intention was to extend this internal site roadway up to the
City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans & Preliminary Plat – Engineering Review
October 5, 2022
Page 7
K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2022-09-12 Submittal\2022-09-30 Meander Park & Boardwalk FPrelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx
future Tamarack Drive extension as indicated in the visioning and traffic study completed
in August 2020.
a. A future access to the development area to the east is not included or discussed
with the proposed plan. This should be documented.
51. A traffic analysis should be completed documenting the queuing of vehicles at the site
access to Meander Road. The parking should be located such that it does not interfere
with the queuing of vehicles.
a. A traffic analysis was completed dated September 8, 2022. We have the
following comments on the Traffic and Parking Study:
i. The Capacity and Level of Service worksheets should be provided.
ii. The analysis indicates that the eastbound right turn lane would not be
required for capacity. However, based on the traffic conditions the right
turn lane volume is anticipated to be larger than the Meander Road thru
volume. The need for a right turn lane should also be looked at with
respect to safety utilizing right turn lane warrant criteria.’
iii. The parking demand should be analyzed assuming “Shared Parking”.
This can be completed by evaluating the time-of-day peaking
characteristics of each use found in the ITE Parking Generation Manual.
This may improve the parking needs for the peak events.
iv. Is it reasonable that patrons would walk from the Loram property to the
event center? If so are facilities available to accommodate the pedestrian
movements?
v. Conclusion #4 indicates no roadway improvements. This should be
modified to include the turn lanes assumed (left turn lanes) and identified
in the study (possible right turn lane).
52. A sight line analysis (vertical curves) should be completed at the driveway intersection on
Meander Road. Provide an exhibit.
Wetlands & Environmental
53. Permanent and temporary wetland impacts are proposed. Impacts must be permitted via
the Wetland Conservation Act and the US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404. An
application has been received and is currently incomplete pending proposed mitigation
information.
54. Upland buffers and buffer setbacks will be required for the project. The northern lobe of
Wetland 1, north of Meander Road is classified as a Preserve based on the City’s
functional classification of wetlands and requires an average 35-foot buffer (minimum 25
feet). Buffer shown on the site plan notes 20-foot minimum buffers, which do not meet the
City’s ordinance. Buffers shown on the grading and erosion control sheets do meet the
requirement. Ensure that correct buffers are shown on all applicable plan sheets.
The southern lobes of Wetland 1, south of Meander Road are classified as Manage 2 and
requires 25-foot average buffer (minimum 20-feet). The planned buffer shown meets the
City’s ordinance.
The proposed gazebo is an accessory structure and requires a 5-foot buffer setback. No
planned buffer was shown for the gazebo. Not applicable, gazebo removed from plans.
55. Approved wetland boundaries should be shown on the grading plans or the site plan of
the property. Complete.
City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans & Preliminary Plat – Engineering Review
October 5, 2022
Page 8
K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2022-09-12 Submittal\2022-09-30 Meander Park & Boardwalk FPrelim Plat - WSB Engineering Review.docx
56. Upland Buffer Zones and locations of buffer markers must be shown on the grading plans
or the site plan for the property.
57. The Meander Park & Boardwalk Development Wetland Buffer Memo (dated 9/9/22) notes
that the residential units on the north site would have decks that extend over the upland
buffer zone but would allow for vegetation to grow beneath. City ordinance requires that
upland buffer zones are preserved predominantly in their natural state and alterations,
including mowing, removal of vegetation, or the introduction of non-native vegetation are
prohibited. Homeowners of the proposed residential units must be aware of this
prohibition such that mowing and unapproved plantings do not occur within the upland
buffer zone.
58. Similar to the comment above, the upland buffer zone beneath the proposed
boardwalk/deck area on the southern wetland, should an exemption from the Principal
Structure Setback Buffer requirement be approved, must remain predominantly in its
natural state.
59. Disturbed areas within the upland buffer zone must be seeded with a native seed mix.
The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted
plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or
modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards. With future submittals,
include a response to the comments in this letter.
We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if
you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet.
Sincerely,
WSB
Jim Stremel, P.E.
City Engineer
September 8, 2022
Meander Park & Boardwalk – Medina, MN, by Medina Ventures, LLC
Project Narrative
Meander Park & Boardwalk is a proposed commercial planned unit development located on the north
side of Highway 55, 900 feet east of Arrowhead Drive.
As the over 18-acre site is surrounded by wetlands to the west and to the south, a wetland delineation
was conducted in September of 2021, which revealed approximately 7 acres of developable land on the
site. Access to the site is located at Meander Road on the north side of the main property.
Upon submission of our initial concept plan to the city in December of 2021, Medina Ventures LLC has
since received feedback from the planning commission, parks commission and city council. In addition to
the initial meetings which took place from January 2022-March 2022, there have been multiple
communications between the development team, SRF Consulting Group and the city planning and public
works department.
The site plan has since been updated to incorporate the guidance provided by the City of Medina Parks
and Planning Commission as well as the City Council. Please see the SRF Supplemental Narrative for
more in-depth descriptions on the technical/engineering aspects of the development.
Although, there have been various notable updates to the site plan over the past 6-9 months since the
concept plan was reviewed, the overall intent of Meander Park and Boardwalk remains the same: To
provide a walkable, aesthetically pleasing entertainment and relaxation destination that incorporates
the natural beauty of the land while providing access to desirable amenities that benefit nearby
residents of Medina as well as other surrounding communities.
The proposed development achieves this intent by incorporating unique design features and structural
elements that we believe will add considerable long-term value to city residents, businesses and
surrounding areas while supporting the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and Community Goals.
The Boardwalk
A meandering boardwalk that follows the natural curves of area wetlands while respecting the buffer
zones will create multiple vista points for guests and serve three main purposes for the development.
1. Functionality: Provide site buildings with additional access points if they so choose as well as
greater visibility and opportunities for outdoor seating and/or additional seasonal service and
display areas and opportunities for local businesses and community.
2. Experience and Education: A boardwalk nestled directly adjacent to wetlands create an
immersive experience for guests allowing them to interact with local wildlife and enjoy the
natural beauty of the wetlands as well as be educated about the importance of their
preservation through informational signage.
3. Aesthetic Beauty: A large boardwalk flanking the highly visible south and western portions of
the development creates a unique design aesthetic for the entire development that sets it apart
from the majority of other commercial developments in neighboring suburbs, where asphalt
tends to dominate majority of the public access points.
These three functions directly support multiple parts of the Comprehensive Plan’s community goals,
including preserving rural vistas, open spaces, wetlands and encouraging an attractive, vibrant business
community that complements residential areas of the City. Furthermore, if given prudent consideration,
the boardwalk could at some point be connected to an area trail and park system to help encourage
healthy lifestyles through greater community connectivity of residents.
Green Space, Ponding and Plaza and Water Features
The next unique component of Meander Park & Boardwalk will be to incorporate a large green space as
well as ponding, plazas and water features throughout. The green space located in the southwest corner
via an upland peninsula will feature trees and maintain a natural looking environment with the potential
for park benches and/or a small gathering area. Ponding will be located throughout the development
providing nice visuals and storm water utility. The plazas areas will create nice gathering spaces while
also allowing for potential art sculptures, seasonal displays, temporary retail services or other event
appropriate curated visuals. The addition and strategic placement of natural water features is a critical
component to not only provide environmental beauty but also dampen nearby highway sounds and
mask nearby highway visuals from guests. The green space, ponding, plazas and water features
component also support the Comprehensive Plan’s community goals by preserving and creating serene
open space environments.
The Venue
The anchor of the development will be a sprawling single story (w/basement) arts, education and
entertainment venue. The venue will be majority-owned, financed and run by the developer which will
not only provide a beautiful building on-site, but one that will also attract the type of businesses that a
high-end, venue would lend itself to. The venue will be designed to host a wide variety of events such as
weddings, celebrations of life, corporate events, small musical performances, traditional art and digital
NFT art exhibitions, technology focused educational seminars, metaverse and traditional video gaming
experiences, film screenings, comedy performances, botanical showcases, local fundraisers, fashion
shows, keynote speaking engagements, religious celebrations, and any other cultural and community
driven gatherings. Certain events will be created and produced by the venue owners themselves.
The design of the building will have a focus on form and function with the intent of being able to serve a
wide range of event types and thus attract a larger network of people, businesses and organizations. We
believe the demographics of Medina and the surrounding communities tend to be highly educated,
upper-middle class residents with an increasingly diverse population of religious, racial and ethnic
backgrounds, which this venue would seek to serve through its ability to accommodate the needs of
potential clients, whatever those needs may be. For example, the venue itself will feature a large,
commissary kitchen that will be built to accommodate a variety of pre-approved local restaurants and
caterers in the area. So, whether it be a classic mid-west meat and potatoes party, a private Diwali
celebration or a vegan luncheon, the venue’s business model can provide the necessary flexibility for
every type of pallet. This model is also attractive given the current state of the food service industry and
the desire of many companies within that market to expand or begin to provide off-site catering.
Though the venue will feature various components such as a grand ballroom, bar area, breakout suites
and other modern amenities, we have gone into greater detail on a few examples below to help better
illustrate an overall vision of purposeful thought.
The Venue: Conservatory
If meandering down a boardwalk on a fall Friday afternoon with close friends or seeing a child smile
while snacking on an ice cream cone in summer isn’t enough, imagine walking through an expansive
conservatory on a day with clear blue skies in the heart of a cold Minnesota winter. The conservatory
will add another unique element to Meander Park and Boardwalk and serve more than just one
purpose.
1. The approximately 3,000 square foot, south facing conservatory will serve as an additional
feature to the venue providing a space that adds grandeur to a wedding ceremony, visceral
intimacy to a celebration of life or perhaps just a little humidity and respite from the bitter cold
and dryness of a cold winter’s day.
2. The conservatory will also operate with the intention of being available not just for private
guests to rent out, but to be open to the public on certain occasions throughout the year such as
educational field trips or design focused seminars showcasing unique ways that the venue may
be heated in the winter or cooled during the summer.
3. Given the location of the conservatory in the southwest corner of the development with full
visibility from Highway 55, the conservatory will serve as a stunning visual hallmark of the entire
Meander Park and Boardwalk development.
The Venue: Basement
The basement, like other aspects of the development and venue is created with multiple purposeful
intentions listed below.
1. Storage: The basement will function as a storage area for event rental equipment, furniture,
maintenance supplies and other service equipment that is not always needed for every event.
2. Access: The basement will allow easy and discreet access for building maintenance and utility
service. The basement service road/door will also allow delivery access for box trucks and vans
to and from the venue from various vendors so as to help keep the main parking lot as free as
possible for guests to arrive and park unencumbered.
3. Respite: The basement will provide an area for event staff to take breaks away from the event
as well as the potential for small gatherings of guests if the occasion should arise.
4. Data storage: The basement will also be used to host computers and servers in a cooler
environment while also providing the opportunity to heat to the conservatory and/or other
parts of the building using heat recapture elements.
The venue, it’s adjacent boardwalk, nearby open green space peninsula and conservatory components
also effectively support the community goals of the Comprehensive Plan in similar ways as the previous
elements, especially in the promotion of public and private gathering places and civic events that serve
the entire community.
Mixture of Additional Businesses on Site
Although the developer will not have full control over what businesses decide to call Meander Park &
Boardwalk home, we plan to market directly to the following types of businesses: Family restaurants,
professional offices, cocktail lounges, breweries, indoor/outdoor food halls, daycares, salons, med spas,
bakeries, ice cream shops, toy stores, fast casual food services, boutique fitness facilities, wine/craft
brew shops and/or photography studios.
At this stage, aside from the venue and its components, we have 3 additional building spaces on the site
plan we would like to have occupied by the businesses mentioned above. Our current priority is
attracting both a restaurant and daycare as we feel these two business types are critical to the
development’s overall success. The restaurant is a priority given the large and ongoing demand for
additional dining options in Medina and the daycare to help fill the large need for families with young
children, some who continue to be on waiting lists at several daycare centers throughout the West
Metro. Also, these two businesses in particular help offset parking given the former will see the most
traffic on nights and weekends and the latter on weekdays alone.
North Property Villas
The north side of the development, which is located north of Meander Road and just west of the Fields
of Medina neighborhood, is zoned Low Density Residential with some parts already described in the Site
Plan section of the SRF Supplemental Narrative will feature 4 modern villas with walkout basements and
rooftop terraces. The modern villas architecture are inspired to compliment the design of the venue,
while also providing the guests who stay there, a unique getaway experience unlike most anything the
area has to offer in terms of conventional lodging options. Furthermore, the villas will be constructed to
take full advantage of the sweeping views and gorgeous sunsets taking place across the protected
wetlands to the west. By developing the north and south properties at the same time, the timing impact
of construction operations could be minimized and provide a better economy of scale for the entire
project. Especially considering the sewer and water connections that will be required on both sides of
Meander Road.
www.srfconsulting.com
3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 | 763.475.0010
Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer
September 7th, 2022
Meander Park and Boardwalk
SRF supplemental narrative sections for site / civil / landscape / wetland / traffic
Overview
Meander Park and Boardwalk is a project located at 1472 State Highway 55, Medina, MN 55340, in
the northeast quadrant of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive. The property and development spans
over two parcels, split by Meander Road, highlighted by an Event Venue and surrounding
commercial on the south parcel, along with a small number of residential duplexes on the north
parcel. City of Medina has provided informal review and comments through a Concept PUD
submittal during the first half of 2022, along with follow-up communication to provide development
guidance.
Zoning
Existing zoning for the north parcel is RR-UR, Rural Residential Urban Reserve and the south
parcel is CH, Commercial Highway. The parcels are being rezoned PUD, Planned Unit
Development, to help provide review of the project to address flexibility for some non-conforming
code requirements while enhancing other aspects of the project. Although rezoning to PUD, the
north parcel is generally guided for R2, Residential, zoning and the south parcel is generally for CH,
Commercial Highway zoning.
Existing Conditions / Removals
Although the total property is around 18.43 acres (north=10.15 acres, south = 8.28 acres) in size, a
large wetland reduces the developable area (non-wetland) to 7.29 acres (north=1.61 acres,
south=5.68), thus maximizing development potential for the limited upland area is important for he
success of he project.
Meander Road is a 2-lane local collector city street with a rural section including side shoulders and
surface drainage to the property and wetland and splits the properties. The road and properties have
a noticeable slope from east to west down to the wetland. The north property is an undeveloped
grassy field with little tree growth, dominated by wetlands. The south property contains a low
maintained old farmstead with an old barn and other accessory structures still standing, an active
well, but no house. It also has a fair amount of volunteer trees along the perimeter of the upland
area, but also dominated by wetlands, primarily to the west and south. The area north and east of
the development is primarily wetland with Highway 55 to the south. The east perimeter has a small
Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022
Client Page 2
60’ wide parcel that contains a gravel driveway access to a single resident farmstead and aerial
utilities, however the south portion of the driveway has been abandon since Meander Road was
developed. To the northeast of this 60’ corridor sits a new residential single family subdivision and
to the southeast lays an undeveloped farm field slated for commercial.
In general, the upland areas will contain typical land disturbance for development along with an
adjacent new urban street and trail. Most of the existing volunteer trees and old structures will be
removed, but the well may be reused for supplemental water for irrigation.
Site Plan
The development has a certain architectural look but in general is designed to be a comprehensive
project with rental residential villas allowing wedding and event parties to lodge adjacent to the
Event Venue, while the other commercial uses complement each other to share a commercial
parking lot. A mix of retail, restaurant, and day care uses provide diversity of demand throughout
the day, that helps provide adequate parking without over building. The distinguishing element that
highlights the project is the elevated boardwalk at the back side of the Event Venue, Retail, and
Restaurant buildings. This provides wetland views while providing other outdoor gathering areas
and building access while minimizing impacts adjacent to the wetland upland buffer.
The residential development will be a pair of duplexes, totaling 4 units, serviced through a shared
private driveway with each unit having two levels, 2-car garage, lower-level rear walkout, and upper
level deck on the back.
Commercial buildings are typical single-story structures, with the exception of the Event Venue that
will also have a smaller footprint lower-level basement for storage and data center, complete with a
concrete pavement service route under the rear boardwalk. Sidewalks will be provided around the
primary sides of the parking, along with a route through the parking lot, connecting the buildings to
the parking and to the Meander Road Trail. There is a peninsula area in the southwest corner of the
south parcel that at one time had property amenities proposed, but currently has been eliminated
and does not have any improvement identified at this time. The Event Venue is looking at
implementing a landscape water feature of waterfalls and koi ponds with enhanced landscaping to
help complement the aesthetic appeal to the development. See the Site Plan sheets for additional
information.
Preliminary Plat
The property will be subdivided into lots to represent possible sale and ownership of certain aspects
of the development. The north area will have four small, attached housing residential lots around
the buildings, with a common outlot owned by a Home Owners Association, or similar. Although
the residential units are initially intended for rental, the platting is preparing it for sale, if this changes
to individual unit ownership. The north parcel will provide typical commercial parcels for the day
care, retail, and restaurant buildings and related parking, while the Event Venue will retain
ownership of the rest of the site, including the storm basins and wetland areas. You will find
additional info, including Drainage and Utility Easements on the Preliminary Plat sheets.
Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022
Client Page 3
Access, Traffic, and Parking
During concept PUD stage, the commercial driveway access was directed by the city to locate as far
west as possible to provide better intersection spacing from the Meander Road / Cavanaugh Drive
residential intersection to the east. Also, concept design originally indicated that the residential
private driveway was opposite the commercial driveway, but City staff indicated that this should be
relocated more to the east to reduce the long driveway and unnecessary improvements, while
lessening the conflicts with the new left turn lane. Currently, the private drive is adjacent to the
existing resident gravel driveway, just east of the property, but with very low traffic volumes coming
from these two driveways, it appears to be an acceptable location.
Meander Road, adjacent to the development, was directed to convert from a rural section to a curb
and gutter urban section, complete with a parallel city trail extension and related boulevard. The
commercial site will require a west bound left turn lane along Meander Road to help reduce traffic
congestion, however the east bound traffic projections indicate that a right turn lane into the
commercial site is unnecessary, including future development projections from the Tamarack Road
study. The left turn lane does not have enough distance to meet MNDOT standards, so a layout to
provide the best stacking, taper, and residential driveway access was provided.
Shared parking has become more common, and the development is utilizing this trend to provide an
appropriate parking lot, without over building it. The commercial buildings provide a compliment
of different uses, with different demands to provide a working solution. When events reach a
certain size, then off-site parking would most likely be required.
The SRF Traffic study provide additional detail on Meander Road traffic data for turn lanes and a
shared parking table indicating typical peak and 85% maximum peak ranges for parking demand.
Grading Drainage and Erosion Control
Grading of the properties generally includes typical commercial and residential standards with
buildings and parking draining to inlets that lead to storm basins, that ultimately discharge to the
wetlands. Efforts have been made to reduce grading in the wetland upland buffer areas and
temporary erosion control has been provided per MPCA NPDES standards. It should be noted
that the wetland floodplain elevation of 986.0’ was impacted within the north parcel area, but
compensatory volume storage was provided in the south development area. See Grading, Drainage,
and Erosion Control plans.
Stormwater
The site primarily captures impervious surface stormwater runoff through storm inlets and
underground piping to Stormwater BMPs and is designed to meet the regulations through cistern
event center roof reuse water for irrigation, underground storm chambers, and surface basins,
Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022
Client Page 4
ultimately discharging to the adjacent wetland. See the Grading and Storm Sewer Plans, along with
the SRF Stormwater Report for more information.
Utilities
Sanitary sewer connection is provided on the north side of Meander Road, by the existing westerly
residential lot, east of the gravel driveway, and watermain is basically available along the north side
of Meander Road. Both the commercial and residential properties provide city owned main lines for
sanitary sewer and watermain throughout the development within Drainage and Utility Easements,
to allow the building service connections. Other utilities appear to be in the area, but not illustrated.
See Utility Plan and Preliminary Plat sheets for more information.
Tree Preservation / Landscape / Irrigation
There are many existing significant volunteer trees being removed on site and have indicated that
many are exempt from mitigation. Although not clearly defined, additional landscaping is provided
for any required tree removal mitigation.
Landscape design is basically providing native seed mixes along the wetland edge, sod around the
parking and buildings, and a robust combination of trees, shrubs, and perennials in many of the
remaining area of the parking and building areas.
Irrigation will be design-build and irrigate the sod and planting areas but leave the native seed areas
unirrigated. The irrigation system is to utilize the reuse event center roof rain water via a cistern,
with supplemental water coming from the existing well on site.
See Tree Preservation and Landscape Plan sheets for more information.
Wetland
Public improvements of Meander Road, city trail, and commercial driveway improvements have
developed wetland impact. Currently wetland mitigation is scheduled through cash purchase
available through banking credits. It should be noted that the project’s floodplain compensatory
storage improvement does disturb the wetland area, but is viewed as a temporary impact, as it is
restoring the wetland, and unclear if this would also qualify for on-site wetland mitigation for other
areas. See SRF WCA application.
Wetland Upland Buffer Average line has been provided on the project, providing the minimum
setback, and average. In addition, the buildings have been placed outside of the Wetland Upland
Buffer and the additional 15’ Primary Structure setback. The elevated decks and boardwalks are
outside of the Wetland Upland Buffer, but within the Primary Structure setback, but indicate the
need for flexibility that they are not a primary structure and providing some mitigation items. See
SRF Wetland Buffer memo.
www.srfconsulting.com
3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 | 763.475.0010
Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer
September 7th, 2022
Meander Park and Boardwalk
SRF supplemental narrative sections for site / civil / landscape / wetland / traffic
Overview
Meander Park and Boardwalk is a project located at 1472 State Highway 55, Medina, MN 55340, in
the northeast quadrant of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive. The property and development spans
over two parcels, split by Meander Road, highlighted by an Event Venue and surrounding
commercial on the south parcel, along with a small number of residential duplexes on the north
parcel. City of Medina has provided informal review and comments through a Concept PUD
submittal during the first half of 2022, along with follow-up communication to provide development
guidance.
Zoning
Existing zoning for the north parcel is RR-UR, Rural Residential Urban Reserve and the south
parcel is CH, Commercial Highway. The parcels are being rezoned PUD, Planned Unit
Development, to help provide review of the project to address flexibility for some non-conforming
code requirements while enhancing other aspects of the project. Although rezoning to PUD, the
north parcel is generally guided for R2, Residential, zoning and the south parcel is generally for CH,
Commercial Highway zoning.
Existing Conditions / Removals
Although the total property is around 18.43 acres (north=10.15 acres, south = 8.28 acres) in size, a
large wetland reduces the developable area (non-wetland) to 7.29 acres (north=1.61 acres,
south=5.68), thus maximizing development potential for the limited upland area is important for he
success of he project.
Meander Road is a 2-lane local collector city street with a rural section including side shoulders and
surface drainage to the property and wetland and splits the properties. The road and properties have
a noticeable slope from east to west down to the wetland. The north property is an undeveloped
grassy field with little tree growth, dominated by wetlands. The south property contains a low
maintained old farmstead with an old barn and other accessory structures still standing, an active
well, but no house. It also has a fair amount of volunteer trees along the perimeter of the upland
area, but also dominated by wetlands, primarily to the west and south. The area north and east of
the development is primarily wetland with Highway 55 to the south. The east perimeter has a small
Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022
Client Page 2
60’ wide parcel that contains a gravel driveway access to a single resident farmstead and aerial
utilities, however the south portion of the driveway has been abandon since Meander Road was
developed. To the northeast of this 60’ corridor sits a new residential single family subdivision and
to the southeast lays an undeveloped farm field slated for commercial.
In general, the upland areas will contain typical land disturbance for development along with an
adjacent new urban street and trail. Most of the existing volunteer trees and old structures will be
removed, but the well may be reused for supplemental water for irrigation.
Site Plan
The development has a certain architectural look but in general is designed to be a comprehensive
project with rental residential villas allowing wedding and event parties to lodge adjacent to the
Event Venue, while the other commercial uses complement each other to share a commercial
parking lot. A mix of retail, restaurant, and day care uses provide diversity of demand throughout
the day, that helps provide adequate parking without over building. The distinguishing element that
highlights the project is the elevated boardwalk at the back side of the Event Venue, Retail, and
Restaurant buildings. This provides wetland views while providing other outdoor gathering areas
and building access while minimizing impacts adjacent to the wetland upland buffer.
The residential development will be a pair of duplexes, totaling 4 units, serviced through a shared
private driveway with each unit having two levels, 2-car garage, lower-level rear walkout, and upper
level deck on the back.
Commercial buildings are typical single-story structures, with the exception of the Event Venue that
will also have a smaller footprint lower-level basement for storage and data center, complete with a
concrete pavement service route under the rear boardwalk. Sidewalks will be provided around the
primary sides of the parking, along with a route through the parking lot, connecting the buildings to
the parking and to the Meander Road Trail. There is a peninsula area in the southwest corner of the
south parcel that at one time had property amenities proposed, but currently has been eliminated
and does not have any improvement identified at this time. The Event Venue is looking at
implementing a landscape water feature of waterfalls and koi ponds with enhanced landscaping to
help complement the aesthetic appeal to the development. See the Site Plan sheets for additional
information.
Preliminary Plat
The property will be subdivided into lots to represent possible sale and ownership of certain aspects
of the development. The north area will have four small, attached housing residential lots around
the buildings, with a common outlot owned by a Home Owners Association, or similar. Although
the residential units are initially intended for rental, the platting is preparing it for sale, if this changes
to individual unit ownership. The north parcel will provide typical commercial parcels for the day
care, retail, and restaurant buildings and related parking, while the Event Venue will retain
ownership of the rest of the site, including the storm basins and wetland areas. You will find
additional info, including Drainage and Utility Easements on the Preliminary Plat sheets.
Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022
Client Page 3
Access, Traffic, and Parking
During concept PUD stage, the commercial driveway access was directed by the city to locate as far
west as possible to provide better intersection spacing from the Meander Road / Cavanaugh Drive
residential intersection to the east. Also, concept design originally indicated that the residential
private driveway was opposite the commercial driveway, but City staff indicated that this should be
relocated more to the east to reduce the long driveway and unnecessary improvements, while
lessening the conflicts with the new left turn lane. Currently, the private drive is adjacent to the
existing resident gravel driveway, just east of the property, but with very low traffic volumes coming
from these two driveways, it appears to be an acceptable location.
Meander Road, adjacent to the development, was directed to convert from a rural section to a curb
and gutter urban section, complete with a parallel city trail extension and related boulevard. The
commercial site will require a west bound left turn lane along Meander Road to help reduce traffic
congestion, however the east bound traffic projections indicate that a right turn lane into the
commercial site is unnecessary, including future development projections from the Tamarack Road
study. The left turn lane does not have enough distance to meet MNDOT standards, so a layout to
provide the best stacking, taper, and residential driveway access was provided.
Shared parking has become more common, and the development is utilizing this trend to provide an
appropriate parking lot, without over building it. The commercial buildings provide a compliment
of different uses, with different demands to provide a working solution. When events reach a
certain size, then off-site parking would most likely be required.
The SRF Traffic study provide additional detail on Meander Road traffic data for turn lanes and a
shared parking table indicating typical peak and 85% maximum peak ranges for parking demand.
Grading Drainage and Erosion Control
Grading of the properties generally includes typical commercial and residential standards with
buildings and parking draining to inlets that lead to storm basins, that ultimately discharge to the
wetlands. Efforts have been made to reduce grading in the wetland upland buffer areas and
temporary erosion control has been provided per MPCA NPDES standards. It should be noted
that the wetland floodplain elevation of 986.0’ was impacted within the north parcel area, but
compensatory volume storage was provided in the south development area. See Grading, Drainage,
and Erosion Control plans.
Stormwater
The site primarily captures impervious surface stormwater runoff through storm inlets and
underground piping to Stormwater BMPs and is designed to meet the regulations through cistern
event center roof reuse water for irrigation, underground storm chambers, and surface basins,
Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022
Client Page 4
ultimately discharging to the adjacent wetland. See the Grading and Storm Sewer Plans, along with
the SRF Stormwater Report for more information.
Utilities
Sanitary sewer connection is provided on the north side of Meander Road, by the existing westerly
residential lot, east of the gravel driveway, and watermain is basically available along the north side
of Meander Road. Both the commercial and residential properties provide city owned main lines for
sanitary sewer and watermain throughout the development within Drainage and Utility Easements,
to allow the building service connections. Other utilities appear to be in the area, but not illustrated.
See Utility Plan and Preliminary Plat sheets for more information.
Tree Preservation / Landscape / Irrigation
There are many existing significant volunteer trees being removed on site and have indicated that
many are exempt from mitigation. Although not clearly defined, additional landscaping is provided
for any required tree removal mitigation.
Landscape design is basically providing native seed mixes along the wetland edge, sod around the
parking and buildings, and a robust combination of trees, shrubs, and perennials in many of the
remaining area of the parking and building areas.
Irrigation will be design-build and irrigate the sod and planting areas but leave the native seed areas
unirrigated. The irrigation system is to utilize the reuse event center roof rain water via a cistern,
with supplemental water coming from the existing well on site.
See Tree Preservation and Landscape Plan sheets for more information.
Wetland
Public improvements of Meander Road, city trail, and commercial driveway improvements have
developed wetland impact. Currently wetland mitigation is scheduled through cash purchase
available through banking credits. It should be noted that the project’s floodplain compensatory
storage improvement does disturb the wetland area, but is viewed as a temporary impact, as it is
restoring the wetland, and unclear if this would also qualify for on-site wetland mitigation for other
areas. See SRF WCA application.
Wetland Upland Buffer Average line has been provided on the project, providing the minimum
setback, and average. In addition, the buildings have been placed outside of the Wetland Upland
Buffer and the additional 15’ Primary Structure setback. The elevated decks and boardwalks are
outside of the Wetland Upland Buffer, but within the Primary Structure setback, but indicate the
need for flexibility that they are not a primary structure and providing some mitigation items. See
SRF Wetland Buffer memo.
Planned Unit Development Flexibility Summary Supplement
Meander Park and Boardwalk Development
11/04/2022
1. Residential 20% Density Bonus Increase
We are requesting flexibility on residential density for the north parcel, as the city can grant an additional 20%
residential bonus density. The R-2 PUD guided zoning indicates a density range of 2-3 units per acre, thus we
are asking for 3 units per acre, plus 20% bonus density, for new density maximum range of 3.6 units per acre. It
is the goal of the project to provide two sets of twin homes totaling four units, on this small parcel of land that
involves significant wetlands. It is our understanding that the City of Medina bases the density on land that
excludes not only wetland, but also wetland upland buffer. To achieve the four units, the property needs a
minimum of 1.2 acres of land per 3.6 units per acre density. The north parcel also needs some flexibility in
wetland upland buffers to make the 1.2 acres obtainable, which is further described in the next PUD flexibility
item.
In summary, the density bonus is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and would benefit this small and
challenging parcel with four units planned for the project. Although we respect the City of Medina’s perspective
on excluding wetland and wetland upland buffer for density calculation, not every community views this in the
same way, and feel that the project’s north parcel is significantly hindered by this interpretation but have
proposed a solution with the help of our PUD flexibility request.
2. Residential Minimum Wetland Upland Buffer Zone Width Setback and Area Distribution
We are requesting flexibility on minimum wetland upland buffer setbacks for the north parcel residential
development area and for redistribution of the wetland upland buffer area from the north parcel to the south
parcel. Both requests are tied to the previous flexibility item above to obtain the proper residential density
maximum due to the wetland upland buffer land area not included in the unit density calculation.
The north wetland is classified as Preserve, which technically requires a 30 foot minimum with 50 foot average,
however City staff has indicated that upon further review, the DNR mapped area is over 1,000 feet away and
that a 35 foot average would be acceptable.
The first request is to provide a minimum of 17 feet for the minimum wetland upland buffer width setback along
the residential north parcel development. This is primarily to provide the appropriate wetland upland buffer
area to allow the land area for the desired residential density. With the wetland buffer average being reduced,
we are requesting some reduction in the buffer width as well. City staff has indicated concern of having the
wetland upland buffer too close to the back yards of the residential units, so this reduced buffer width from 30
feet to 17 feet provides a little more space to each unit, and to help prevent future buffer encroachment, a split
rail fence is being added at this boundary to control lawn mowing maintenance and impacts, to provide a more
permanent marker.
Although unclear if needed, we are also asking that the elevated residential decks not be considered a structure
and not adhere to the buffer structure setbacks, as it is significantly elevated at the upper level of the residence
and would allow rainwater through gaps in the typical decking surface and allow enough sunlight for vegetation
to grow below.
The second request is for flexibility to redistribute about 10,000 SF of the required north parcel wetland buffer
average area to the south parcel. The total required buffer average is still achieved between the two parcels,
but to provide the north property residential land area for the density requested, we are moving the designated
area to the south property, where there is more room for this item.
It is our approach to still provide the spirit of the wetland buffers but are offering a creative solution for
flexibility approval to allow integration of other elements into the project, thus the purpose of the Planned Unit
Development application.
3. Water Feature Commercial Minimum Upland Buffer Zone Width
We are requesting flexibility for minimum upland buffer zone width to build a landscape water feature adjacent
to the wetland buffer zone on the southwest corner of the development. This water feature is a critical
component of the development as it will provide the necessary visual and audible screening for venue guests at
the venue, while mutually creating a beautiful aesthetic for those driving past the venue on Highway 55. The
specific location of the water feature was strategically chosen given its close proximity to the conservatory
portion of the venue where guests of the venue will be getting married among other ceremonious occasions.
The water feature will provide guests inside the conservatory a beautiful backdrop of a waterfall and guests
outside the conservatory on the boardwalk, the serene sound of water percolating into a holding pond thus
masking the sound of cars driving by at 55 miles per hour. Given the chosen location of the conservatory to be
south facing and the limited amount of upland in that area, placing the water feature within the buffer zone is
the only practical place to put it. Furthermore, we may choose to inscribe the main highway signage for the
venue on the water feature’s southwest outer face.
In summary, placing the water feature in this critical area will provide a secluded oasis experience – a grotto per
se - for those within the venue and when combined with the conservatory as a backdrop, create a landmark
visual in Medina to rival any development along the Highway 55 corridor west of the Twin Cities.
Water feature height is expected to be approximately 15’ tall to accommodate for the area’s boardwalk height
of 6’ to 9’ tall, screening element for guests inside and outside the venue. It will require a base size of between
30’-40’ to support that height given the splash radius and structural integrity. A portion of the 30’-40’ base width
can be tucked underneath the boardwalk where we intend to have a holding pond with koi fish. The overall
length of the boardwalk will be approximately 65’. The materials used in the water feature will be a mix of
natural boulders, preformed concrete, fountain mechanicals, and additional landscaping such as pockets of
plants incorporated throughout to achieve a truly natural aesthetic and feel.
The south wetland is classified as Manage 2 and indicates a Minimum Upland Buffer Zone Width of 20 feet and
to be in a natural state, via a native seed mix. Technically there is a minimum of 20 feet of area between the
delineated wetland boundary and the edge of the elevated boardwalk, however, City staff indicated concern
about the landscape water feature not fully defined as an element within the native buffer, so requested that
the water feature be located outside of the upland buffer and reduce the minimum buffer zone in this area. To
help resolve, we are requesting flexibility to move the buffer setback line to 2’ to allow the necessary area for
the landscape water feature. As a supplemental note, the project’s proposed Wetland Average Upland Buffer
boundary area exceeds the existing area, as noted in the Wetland Upland Buffer Summary and shown on the
Overall Site Plan Sheet. It should also be noted that in the Wetland Buffer Memo, we are also providing some
mitigation of the reduced setback by providing removal of non-native species in the upland buffer area and
planting native vegetation through a seed mix, adding more desirable trees to the site, and providing
interpretive signage that explains the importance of wetlands and upland buffer areas at the commercial
boardwalk area.
Although unclear if needed, we are also asking that the elevated commercial boardwalk not be considered a
structure and not adhere to the buffer structure setbacks, as it is significantly elevated at the upper level of the
commercial building and would allow rain water through gaps in the typical decking surface and allow enough
sunlight for vegetation to grow below.
4. Parking Lot Landscape Islands
We are requesting flexibility on the south parking lot landscape percentage and the layout of landscape islands
to break up the parking lot to minimize the expanse. The first request is to receive flexibility to reduce the
parking landscape island percentage from 8% to 5%. Due to the significant area of wetlands (an existing
landscape feature) on the property, the developable area and parking is limited and has little room to reduce
parking to accommodate. It is also noted that there is a pedestrian sidewalk system through the center of the
parking lot going north-south, that is not included in the calculation, which would help increase this percentage
if counted. To help compensate, the islands are also significantly landscaped with trees and perennial plants to
increase the landscape appearance in the parking areas. The second flexibility request is to accept the parking
landscape islands as proposed, that are already added from the concept plan to help break up the expanse of
the parking lot. The parking lot area is limited and is not that large at 231 spaces compared to the Medina
Target that exceeds 500 spaces. There is no desire to add more landscape islands as this limits the flexibility of
the parking lot to be used for Event valet stacking of parking and feel that the current layout provides an
appropriate level of landscape to break up this limited parking area.
5. Day Care Building Setback
We are requesting a 12’ setback from the right-of-way boundary to our proposed daycare building vs the 25’
setback the city code standard. Given the limited buildable space of the site and desire to accommodate the
right mix of business uses on the overall vision of Meander Park and Boardwalk, we hope this can be
accommodated through our Planned Unit Development. If the daycare building becomes too small, it is less
likely to attract a viable daycare provider, which we believe would otherwise positively benefit the growing
demand from young families moving into the area. The intent is to angle the building parallel to the parking lot
and have a corner of the building reach this 12’ setback (not the entire side of the structure) which opens up
more triangle space for the day care play equipment in the play area.
6. Parking
Although we believe the 231 parking spaces is sufficient to accommodate the business uses proposed, there
may be some occasions where events exceed the 300 or so guests at the venue and have an agreement with
Loram Maintenance of Way, located at the southeast quadrant of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive, for
additional parking on the weeknights and weekends via a shuttle service that the owner/operator of the venue
would provide. Furthermore, given the parking for the proposed daycare will likely only operate during normal
daytime business hours Monday-Friday, we intend to utilize those parking spaces via a valet service during
weekend events. By using a valet service, we have the ability to “double park” most of the spaces, thus gaining
at least an additional 50 parking spaces and potentially more given the wide parking aisle near the north side of
the daycare parking area. It should be noted that even though the Event Venue has 300 seats in both the
conservatory and ballroom, it typically is used for the same 300-person event, such as the ceremony in one and
reception in the other for the same crowd. The SRF Traffic and Parking Study has summarized that almost all
100-person, 200-person, and 300-person (weekends) events can accommodate enough parking on site during an
average event, when planned properly with other uses on site. Based on the parking study and plans for off-site
parking, via shuttle, it is our request for flexibility in parking space minimum requirements as part of our Planned
Unit Development, as the shared parking concept with different demand uses and off-site parking options for
larger events, provide the necessary parking for the development.
7. Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape
The existing trees on the property are generally considered more of a pioneering tree species that have grown
during the life of the previous farmstead, and not considered part of a woodland community or has any special
natural interest. City Code indicates that the “control of pioneering Tree species” are exempt from the
mitigation requirements, thus we are requesting that the removal of all of these trees are exempt from any tree
preservation or replacement requirements as part of the flexibility of our Planned Unit Development. It should
be noted that the landscape plan does provide some mitigation of the loss of existing trees by exceeding the
minimum requirements for trees and shrubs/perennials to help provide an appropriate and attractive
landscape.
8. Residential Units for Lodging
The north residential units (villas) are to complement the Event Venue by providing rental lodging for guests,
such as a wedding party, family, friends, or general travelers. It is the request of this project, as part of the
Planned Unit Development, that flexibility be provided to recognize these units as lodging rental use homes, and
not strictly as permanent single family residential homes. The property and units will be setup under one
common management, like a Home-Owners-Association (HOA) to take care of the grounds and buildings, such
as lawn mowing, snow removal, and maintenance.
612.388.66222324 Brewster Street
St. Paul, MN 55108 info@VillamilArchitecture.com
\//\
\//\VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
11/02/22
Page 1 of 3
PUD Submittal
Meander Park and Boardwalk
Architectural Narrative
Building Materials
Meander Park and Boardwalk has a mix of uses that share a natural building material palette. The materiality of the
buildings is one of natural products that exemplify the natural beauty and wear of what the natural environment provides.
This is most easily understood as wood and stone, but in this case also encompasses the common construction materials
that we have come to know as the basic building materials developed in the industrial revolution. These man made
materials are concrete, and metal. The use of all of these materials share in a concept of showing the simple natural beauty
of what can be achieved through their use architecturally. The category of real natural materials goes beyond the initial
appearance of a newly built building and includes the aesthetic these materials provide as they get used and start to show
wear and the natural process of an aging material. These types of materials often do not need to be painted to achieve an
acceptable durability and beauty, and can be stained, sealed, or in the case of steel blackened using heat. The use of
Corten steel as a facade material starts out looking like ordinary untreated metal, and the beauty of its final appearance
begins through an oxidation process as it ages. The metal takes on a rusty appearance that is its natural beauty and also
the reason it is protected from the elements. Sealing this material is only optional as the natural deep rust color is all it
needs to last for centuries. The use of concrete should exemplify its qualities of the process of construction used to erect it.
This can be illustrated as board formed concrete that shows the imprinting of the boards used in the construction of the
formwork, or the exposed form tie holes left by a smoother square patterned formwork.
Venue
This building is composed of three parts: Conservatory, Kitchen/Lounge, and Ballroom. These three parts of the building
have a distinct character that breaks the long facade. They assemble in a manner where they connect seamlessly to one
another yet create a visually appealing mix of different materialities. There are elements that carry throughout the building
like the tall black framed doors, and other black metal accents. The boardwalk is the main feature tying the west facade
together with large green planing walls that add a layering to the back of the building overlooking the wetlands.
The Conservatory is almost entirely glass and shares a stone wall with the adjacent Kitchen/Lounge. The glass is framed
with a black metal frame.
The Kitchen and Lounge have a white tile, and black brick facade, respectively.
The Ballroom is entirely clad with a natural vertical gapped wood facade.
The west side of the building has a walkout basement with a boardwalk above that wraps the backside of the building
connecting all the spaces. The basement walls are board formed concrete.
The Basement is a walkout made of concrete walls.
Wood: (Min 25% - Max 35%)Brick/Tile: (Min 10% - Max 20%)Stone: (Min 2% - Max 6%)
Concrete: (Min 15% - Max 25%)Glazing: (Min 25% - Max 35%)
West Elevation
612.388.66222324 Brewster Street
St. Paul, MN 55108 info@VillamilArchitecture.com
\//\
\//\VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
11/02/22
Page 2 of 3
PUD Submittal
Mall
The Mall runs parallel to HWY 55 and has two faces to it: the South-facing HWY 55, and the North-facing parking off of
Meander Rd. The shops at Meander Park and Boardwalk utilize both North and South storefronts as active points of
entrance for the public. The South storefronts are all connected to the boardwalk that continues to the Venue and produces
a lively southerly sun lit area that connects to buildings to the slice of wetlands that runs in between the main thoroughfare
of HWY 55. The South facade acts as a main storefront for signage and public activities. Both sides of the building share the
same material choices and create a cohesive material palette across the North and South elevations identifying the strip mall
as one row of shops that are a collective. At the same time as identifying as one row of shops they need to have distinctive
materiality from the neighboring store. The different material choices should be simplified down to just a few, and alternate
every other shop's elevation. The entries of the shops are an element that is shared across the storefronts.
The Windows of all the buildings should be of the highest quality, meeting at a minimum of the standard commercial quality
standards. The fenestrations are an important part of the appearance of the facade and overall architectural appearance.
The doors and windows should be a minimum of eight feet in height and cover a significant portion of the facades creating
a very transparent appearance breaking up all portions of the walls that are a storefront face of the building. The South
storefronts should run glazing down to the finished floor. The horizontal partitioning of the windows should not obstruct the
lower eight feet of the glazing systems creating large unobstructed views only broken by the vertical structure of the
windows.
Wood: (Min 25% - Max 35%)
Restaurant
The standalone building furthest to the East should share in the patterning of the strip malls facades and be broken up by
using at a minimum two distinct materials. This building should also share in the entry style of the adjacent strip mall
having tall glass doors.
Wood: (Min 15% - Max 40%)
South Elevation
South Elevation
Corten: (Min 25% - Max 35%)Concrete: (Min 15% - Max 25%)
Glazing (Min 25% - Max 30%)
Concrete: (Min 50% - Max 85%)
Glazing (Min 25% - Max 30%)
612.388.66222324 Brewster Street
St. Paul, MN 55108 info@VillamilArchitecture.com
\//\
\//\VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
11/02/22
Page 3 of 3
PUD Submittal
Daycare
The Daycare is a representation of a simple historical schoolhouse. This iconic shape is reminiscent of a classical gable
faced roof with dormers that was utilized by the settlers of the US. The wood horizontal siding covers the majority of the
facade with accents created through fenestrations and entry points.
Residence
The residence facade is a rustic wood run vertically. The entry and garage door provide accents of a brighter clean smooth
wood facade. The deck and fenestrations accent a black metal finish.
North Elevation
East Elevation
Wood: (Min 70% - Max 80%)Stone: (Min 5% - Max 10%)
Glazing (Min 10% - Max 20%)
Wood: (Min 80% - Max 90%)Glazing (Min 10% - Max 25%)
Conservatory Close Up South Conservatory Close Up South Night
Boardwalk Convervatory South View On Boardwalk Looking Southwest Boardwalk NightBoardwalk View Facing East
Boardwalk View
Coming Down Boardwalk WestLooking Down from Boardwalk
Conservatory View Facing Out South View from Highway 55 1
View from Highway 55 2
View from Highway 55 1 Night
View from Highway 55 2 Night
Southwest Water Feature
Design Board
Meander Park & Boardwalk
Designed for decorative lighting, Lampion is a cylindrical lamp with a customizable perforated cage
made of stainless steel, suspended under an aluminum electrical housing. To restore ambient lighting,
the luminaire is equipped with a IP66 48 LED module and a driver integrated into the cage, measuring
26 inches high and 16 inches in diameter (Lampion Modern). Equipped with a discreet locking
mechanism and tool-less entry for maintenance. This Class I and II luminaire is a mood creator thanks
to the play of lights produced by the optional customizable cutting patterns. Also available in a backlit
version, this new interpretation called Lampion Glow enhances its aesthetics and gives it a unique visual
rendering.
www.ragni-lighting.com
AM
B
I
A
N
C
E
| DEC
O
R
A
T
I
V
E
LIG
H
T
I
N
G
| LA
M
P
I
O
N
Ø16
26
1’’GAZ male
Weight (Ibs)23
2.85
Protection index (Electrical h ousing)IP 54
Shock resistance (Body)IK 10
Materials : Electrical h ousing
Cage
Aluminum
Stainless steel
Dimensions (in)
Surge protector or over/under voltage protection
Possibility of lighting management (control, automatic lowering of intensity etc.)
NTC sensor
Photocell
Customization:
LAMPION MODERN
OPTIONS
Inlay of a customization element (logo,
city coat of arms, decorative pattern)
within the cage after a feasibility study
by our technical service.
Two-tone declination (different shade
between the cage and the electrical
housing).
AM
B
I
A
N
C
E
| DEC
O
R
A
T
I
V
E
LIG
H
T
I
N
G
| LA
M
P
I
O
N
www.ragni-lighting.com
EPA (ft2)
Variations of
ensembles
AMBIANCE
I
DECORATIVE
LIGHTING
I
LAMPION
LAMPION GLOW
ROME 100 -JIMA 400Al
LRwww.ragni-lighting.com
BI LAMPION
HELIS 100 - CYL 350 C 1 LAMPION
ROME 100 - JIMA 500
Narrative explanation regarding update to lodging amenity for venue on Meander Park and
Boardwalk Development – 12/1/2022
As discussed at the Planning Commission meeting in November, we have updated the design of the
venue building to accommodate the lodging amenity that we had originally planned for the four villas on
the north parcel of land. This decision was made in real time as a response to thoughtfully address the
negative comments received during the public forum and subsequent potential concerns expressed by
some of the commissioners. Given the purpose of the lodging as a necessary amenity to the venue, we
requested lodging be moved to the venue itself as an alternative.
As one can see by the updated design, we have added a second story and third story lodging option,
despite only discussing a second story at the Planning Commission meeting. The purpose for adding a
third story is that upon further analysis of the second story option, we realized only the center part of
the building was available to provide lodging because in order to build a second story on top of the
ballroom area of the venue, we would need to add pillars for structural integrity. However, adding pillars
significantly diminishes both the visual experience for guests as well as staff flow given their obstructive
nature. Thus, in order to achieve the minimum of 12 bedrooms that were going to be available in the
four luxury villas, a third story revealed itself as the next best option to make up for the lodging we
originally intended to be provided on the north parcel.
UP
Room
Room
Room
Room
ELEVATOR
Room
Room
Room
Room
7' -
3
"
28
'
-
6
"
17
'
-
8
"
17
'
-
8
"
18
'
-
1
"
89
'
-
2
"
25' - 6"7' - 2"25' - 6"
58' - 1"
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale: 1/8" 1'-0"
A103
LO
D
G
I
N
G
L
E
V
E
L
2
&
3
11
/
3
0
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
1/8" 1'-0"1 LEVEL 2 & 3
RES
UNIT 1
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 2
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 3
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 4
1800 SF
RESTAURANT
4,975 SF
PLAY AREA
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
PLAY AREA
EVENT VENUE
15,150 SF
PLUS
6,996 SF
BASEMENT
(STORAGE /
DATA CENTER)
RETAIL
9,600 SF
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
PRIVATE DRIVE
MBMBMBMB
TR
E
E
*
7
8
TR
E
E
*
2
8
TR
E
E
*
2
9
TR
E
E
*
3
3
TR
E
E
*
6
2
TR
E
E
*
6
1
TR
E
E
*
6
0
TR
E
E
*
5
9
TR
E
E
*
5
8
TR
E
E
*
5
7
>>
S
W
E
L
L
PE
D
C
VL
T
C
C
F
O
PE
D
C E
EO
H
-
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)
F/O(UG)
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>
>>
>>
G
G
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
S S
S N
1.SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVAL PLAN, ALONG WITH ANY RELATED SURVEYS FOR DETAILS ON
PROPERTY BACKGROUND INFORMATION.
2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON BUILDINGS, MONUMENT SIGNS, TRASH
ENCLOSURES, AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS. VERIFY WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS THE EXACT BUILDING
DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS/SERVICE, AND OTHER RELATED BUILDING ITEMS.
3.SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR
SITE LIGHTING LOCATIONS, DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS.
4.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF CONCRETE, OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING, UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE.
5.ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 5.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
6.ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE CONCRETE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH
AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS, AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT
OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO
PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT
STANDARDS, OR AS APPROVED.
8.BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF
THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, OR AS NOTED. PAVEMENT AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO ADHERE TO ALL
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSIBILITY, INCLUDING SLOPE. CONTACT
ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY INVOLVING ANY DISCREPANCIES.
9.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL
PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
10.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING.
11.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL SITE GOVERNMENTAL PERMITS AND FEES.
12.SEE SHEET C2.2 FOR MEANDER ROAD TYPICAL SECTION.
SITE NOTES
1.ALL TRAFFIC SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL
CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL
DEVICES (MMUTCD), OR AS NOTED OTHERWISE.
2.PARKING LOT STRIPING SHALL BE 4" WIDE COLOR WHITE, TWO COATS OF PAINT. CONTRACTOR
SHALL PAINT ANY/ALL DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROWS AS SHOWN IN WHITE (TWO COATS).
3.ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNS AND MARKINGS PER LATEST ADA CODE AND REQUIREMENTS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY IN EACH
DESIGNATED ACCESSIBLE STALL IN BLUE BACKGROUND WITH WHITE BORDER (TWO COATS OF
PAINT). CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT THE WORDS "NO PARKING" IN EACH ACCESSIBLE ISLE
ADJACENT TO AN ACCESSIBLE SPACE IN WHITE LETTERS MINIMUM 12" IN HEIGHT. SIGNS TO BE
LOCATED AT THE HEAD OF THE PARKING SPACE. SEE ACCESSIBLE PARKING DETAILS.
4.ALL SIGNS SHALL INCLUDE MOUNTING HARDWARE, POST, CONCRETE FOOTING AND CASING
WHERE REQUIRED. CONCRETE CASING REQUIRED IN LOCATIONS WHERE POST IS NOT
PROTECTED BY CURB.
5.IF NOTED, ALL STOP SIGNS SHALL INCLUDE A 12" WIDE PAINTED STOP BAR IN WHITE PAINT
(TWO COATS) PLACED AT THE STOP SIGN LOCATION, A MINIMUM OF 4' FROM CROSSWALK. ALL
STOP BARS SHALL EXTEND FROM DIRECTIONAL TRANSITION BETWEEN LANES TO THE CURB.
6.ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED 18" BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
SIGNAGE AND STRIPING NOTES
SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
PROPERTY ADDRESS / PID:1472 STATE HIGHWAY 55 (PID 0211823330003)
MEDINA, MN 55340
PROPERTY AREA:802,799 S.F. (18.429 AC), PER SURVEY BOUNDARY
442,152 S.F. (10.150 AC) = NORTH PARCEL
360,647 S.F. (8.279 AC) = SOUTH PARCEL
DEVELOPABLE PROPERTY AREA:317,556 S.F. (7.290 AC) = 39.6%
(EXCLUDING WETLAND)70,214 S.F. (1.612 AC) = 15.9% NORTH PARCEL
247,342 S.F. (5.678 AC) = 68.6% SOUTH PARCEL
DEVELOPABLE PROPERTY AREA:317,556 S.F. (7.290 AC) = 39.6%
(EXCLUDING WETLAND & WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER)52,322 S.F. (1.201 AC) = 11.8% NORTH PARCEL
204,459 S.F. (4.693 AC) = 56.69% SOUTH PARCEL
PROPERTY OWNER:R & J PARTNERSHIP OF MEDINA
PROPERTY DEVELOPER:MEDINA VENTURE, LLC
EXISTING ZONING:RR-UR (RURAL RESIDENTIAL URBAN RESERVE) = NORTH
CH (COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY) = SOUTH
PROPOSED ZONING:PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) BOTH NORTH AND SOUTH
GUIDED R2 = NORTH
GUIDED CH = SOUTH
BUILDING TOTAL:51,421 S.F.
NORTH RESIDENTIAL (BLOCK 1, LOT 1-4):4 UNITS (2 DUPLEX), 1,800 S.F. EACH
SOUTH EVENT VENUE (BLOCK 2, LOT 1):22,146 S.F. (INCLUDING 6,996 S.F. BASEMENT)
SOUTH DAY CARE (BLOCK 2, LOT 2):7,500 S.F.
SOUTH RESTAURANT (BLOCK 2, LOT 3):4,975 S.F.
SOUTH RETAIL (BLOCK 2, LOT 4):9,600 S.F.
FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) - REQUIRED:PER PUD
FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) - PROVIDED:0.06 ( 51,421 / 802,799)
BUILDING COVERAGE MAXIMUM:PER PUD
BUILDING COVERAGE PROVIDED:5.1% (40,825 / 802,799)
BUILDING SETBACKS:PER PUD
PROJECT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - EXISTING:29,502 S.F., INCLUDING STREET / TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - PROPOSED:204,000 S.F., INCLUDING STREET / TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - INCREASE:174,500 S.F., INCLUDING STREET / TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS
PARKING REQUIRED:PER PUD, SHARED PARKING
PARKING PROVIDED:PER PUD, SHARED PARKING
NORTH - RESIDENTIAL:10 SPACES (8 WITHIN GARAGES AND 2 VISTOR), EXCLUDING DRIVEWAY
SOUTH - COMMERCIAL:231 SPACES (W/ 8 ACCESSIBLE)
PARKING SIZE MIN. REQUIRED/PROVIDED:9' WIDE X 18' DEEP, 24' DRIVE AISLE (22' MIN.)
PARKING SETBACK:PER PUD
PARKING LANDSCAPE (COMMERCIAL ONLY):5,019 S.F. (5.67%) FOR 88,508 S.F. PERIMETER
SITE PLAN
OVERALL
C2.0
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Professional Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
P. SCHROEDER
15295
N. SCHAUFENBUEL
N. SCHAUFENBUEL
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25721
MICHAEL C. AARON
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
LANDSCAPE
WATER FEATURE
LANDSCAPE
WATER FEATURE
WETLAND CLASSIFICATION
NORTH PARCEL PRESERVE
SOUTH PARCEL MANAGE 2
UPLAND BUFFER ZONE AVERAGE WIDTH
NORTH PARCEL 50 FEET (CITY ALLOWS 35 FEET)
SOUTH PARCEL 25 FEET
MINIMUM UPLAND BUFFER ZONE MINIMUM WIDTH
NORTH PARCEL 30 FEET (CITY MAY ALLOW LESS)
SOUTH PARCEL 20 FEET
BUFFER SETBACK (PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE)
NORTH PARCEL 15 FEET
SOUTH PARCEL 15 FEET
BUFFER SETBACK (ACCESSORY STRUCTURE)
NORTH PARCEL 5 FEET
SOUTH PARCEL 5 FEET
WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER AREA 60,744 SF - EXISTING
NORTH EXISTING 27,485 SF (35 FOOT AVERAGE)
SOUTH EXISTING 33,259 SF (25 FOOT AVERAGE)
WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER AREA 60,775 SF - PROPOSED (CROSS HATCHED AREA)
NORTH PROPOSED 17,892 SF
SOUTH PROPOSED 42,883 SF
PUD FLEXIBILITY
NORTH PARCEL MINIMUM UPLAND BUFFER ZONE WIDTH
(17 FEET MINIMUM AT DEVELOPMENT)
NORTH PARCEL AREA REDUCTION WITH MITIGATION ON SOUTH PARCEL
SOUTH PARCEL MINIMUM UPLAND BUFFER ZONE WIDTH
(2 FEET MINIMUM AT LANDSCAPE WATER FEATURE)
WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15')
WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER (SOUTH=MIN. 20')
DELINEATED WETLAND LINE
WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15')
DELINEATED WETLAND LINE
LOT 1 BLOCK 1
LOT 2 BLOCK 1
LOT 3 BLOCK 1
LOT 4 BLOCK 1
OUTLOT
TOTAL
4,560 SF
4,405 SF
4,405 SF
4,560 SF
424,222 SF
442,152 SF
0.105 ACRES
0.101 ACRES
0.101 ACRES
0.105 ACRES
9.738 ACRES
10.150 ACRES
PROPOSED PLAT NAME: MEANDER (SEE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONS)
PROPOSED PARCEL INFO:
PROPOSED PROPERTY
MEANDER - PLAT SUMMARY - NORTH
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA ACRES
LOT 1 BLOCK 2
LOT 2 BLOCK 2
LOT 3 BLOCK 2
LOT 4 BLOCK 2
TOTAL
266,748 SF
30,391 SF
34,157 SF
29,351 SF
360,647 SF
6.123 ACRES
0.698 ACRES
0.784 ACRES
0.674 ACRES
8.279 ACRES
MEANDER - PLAT SUMMARY - SOUTH
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA ACRES
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 1
OUTLOT
LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4
LOT 1
LOT 2
LOT 3
LOT 4
230 TOTAL PARKING SPACES (INCLUDING 8 ADA)
10 TOTAL PARKING SPACES (INCLUDING 2 PER GARAGE AND 2 VISITOR)
ELEVATED BOARDWALK
ELEVATED
BOARDWALK
UPPER
LEVEL
DECK,
LOWER
LEVEL
WALKOUT
(TYP.)WETLAND
WETLAND
WETLAND
WETLAND
WETLAND
WETLAND
MEANDER ROAD
PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS
- URBAN SECTION WITH CURB
- WEST BOUND LEFT TURN LANE
- LANE CENTER LINE RADIUS TO
ACCOMMODATE 40 MPH SPEED
(667' MIN.)
- CITY TRAIL CROSSING
10' CITY BITUMINOUS TRAIL
WITH 5' BOULEVARD
COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY
WITH DEDICATED OUTBOUND
LEFT AND RIGHT LANES
RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY
EXISTING FARMSTEAD RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY
SITE LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
EASEMENT
SETBACK LINE (PER CODE)
EXISTING CONDITIONS
TRUNCATED DOMES
CURB AND GUTTER
CURB AND GUTTER (TIP-OUT)
ORNAMENTAL FENCE
PARKING LOT POLE LIGHT
RETAINING WALL
PARKING SPACES PER ROW
WETLAND DELINEATION LINE
WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER
WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER & WETLAND
BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
WETLAND UPLAND
BUFFER SETBACK
PUD FLEXIBILITY
AT DEVELOPMENT,
MIN. 17' , WITH
SPLIT RAIL FENCE
AT BACKYARD
PERIMETER(TYP.)
WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER
WETLAND UPLAND
BUFFER SETBACK
PUD FLEXIBILITY
AT LANDSCAPE
WATER FEATURE,
MIN. 2' (TYP.)
WETLAND
UPLAND
BUFFER
DELINEATED WETLAND LINE
WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER SUMMARY
WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER
(SOUTH=MIN. 20')
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
1 10-20-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE
2 11-04-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE
MBMBMBMB
TR
E
E
*
2
8
TR
E
E
*
2
9
TR
E
E
*
3
3
TR
E
E
*
6
2
TR
E
E
*
6
1
TR
E
E
*
6
0
TR
E
E
*
5
9
TR
E
E
*
5
8
TR
E
E
*
5
7
>>
>>
RESTAURANT
4,975 SF
PLAY AREA
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
PLAY AREA
EVENT VENUE
15,150 SF
PLUS
6,996 SF
BASEMENT
(STORAGE /
DATA CENTER)
RETAIL
9,600 SF
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
PRIVATE DRIVE
S
W
E
L
L
PE
D
C
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)F/O(UG)F/O(UG)
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>
>
G
G
G
G
F/O(U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
S S
N
STORM SEWER
PLAN SOUTH
C5.3
UTILITY LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
STORM SEWER
DRAIN TILE
SANITARY SEWER
WATER MAIN
ELECTRIC (BURIED)
ELECTRIC (OVERHEAD)
TELEPHONE (BURIED)
TELEPHONE (OVERHEAD)
TELEVISION (BURIED)
TELEVISION (OVERHEAD)
FIBER OPTIC (BURIED)
FIBER OPTIC (OVERHEAD)
COMMUNICATION (UNDEFINED)
NATURAL GAS LINE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS
STORM MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN
STORM FLARED END SECTION
CLEAN OUT (CO)
SANITARY MANHOLE
HYDRANT
GATE VALVE
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Professional Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
P. SCHROEDER
15295
N. SCHAUFENBUEL
N. SCHAUFENBUEL
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25721
MICHAEL C. AARON
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
UNDERGROUND STORMWATER FILTRATION BASIN
PRINSCO HS180, OR APPROVED EQUAL.
146'X73'
STORMWATER FILTRATION BASIN.
SEE GRADING PLAN AND DETAILS
RAINWATER REUSE CISTERN
10,000 GAL
60" GOLDPRO STORM SYSTEM OR
APPROVED EQUAL. SEE DETAILS
UPPER FFE = 998.0'
LOWER FFE = 989.0'
WETLAND ELEVATION VARIABLE
FLOODPLAIN 986.0'
FFE = 998.0'
FFE = 998.0'
FFE = 1000.0'
EX
.
1
2
"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
W
M
STM CB 116
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM = 990.21
N INV = 983.82
S INV = 984.54
STM CB 118
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM = 992.99
NW INV = 985.23
SE INV = 985.33
STM MH 120
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM = 994.32
E INV = 990.19
W INV = 986.49
N INV = 990.53
STM MH 122
60" DIA. PRETREATMENT
R-1642-B
RIM 995.70
W INV = 991.00
N INV = 989.31
S INV = 989.41
SUMP = 983.41
62 LF 18" RCP @ 1.0%
70 LF
1
8
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
0
%
11
6
L
F
1
8
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
0
%
82
L
F
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
0
%
STM CB 124
48" DIA. R-3067-V
RIM 994.49
N INV = 989.55
W INV = 990.05
S INV = 989.65
STM CB 126
48" DIA. R-3067-VB
RIM 993.18
W INV = 990.14
N INV = 989.84
S INV = 990.14
STM MH 128
R-1642-B
RIM 995.21
INV = 991.11
STM CB 130
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM 995.0
E INV = 990.82
STM CB 132
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM 994.13
E INV = 990.61
W INV = 990.51
S INV = 990.61
42
L
F
1
2
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
5
%
93
L
F
1
8
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
5
%
37 LF 18" RCP @ 0.5%
STM CB 134
48" DIA.
R-3067-VB
RIM 993.96
W INV = 990.72
N INV = 990.27
S INV = 990.57
STM CB 136
48" DIA.
R-3067-V
RIM 994.10
SE INV = 991.12
N INV = 990.94
S INV = 991.04
STM CB 138
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM 996.93
N INV = 991.99
STM CB 140
48" DIA.
R-3067-VB
RIM 995.91
NW INV = 992.52
S INV = 992.62
STM CB 142
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-VB
RIM 993.96
E INV = 990.89
STM CB 138
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-VB
RIM 993.18
E INV = 990.31
28 LF 24" RCP @ 0.5%
26 LF 18" RCP @ 0.5%
37 LF 18" RCP @ 1.0%
63 LF 1
5
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
5
%
14
0
L
F
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
0
%
17 LF 15" RCP @ 1.0%
17 LF 15" RCP @ 1.0%
DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT (TYP.)
12.0'
12
.
0
'
12.0'
12.0'
12
.
0
'
GRAF FILTER
INV = 990.91
STM CB 131
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM 996.20
W INV = 990.34
15" STORM APRON
INV = 990.0
34 LF 15" RCP @ 1.0%
WET WELL
60" DIA.
R-1642-B
WATER REUSE PUMP
AND TREATMENT SKID
CONTECH STORMFILTER VAULT AND FILTER
CARTRIDGES, OR APPROVED EQUAL. SEE DETAILS
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
1 10-20-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE
MBMBMBMB
TR
E
E
*
7
8
RES
UNIT 1
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 2
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 3
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 4
1800 SF
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
PLAY AREA
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
PRIVATE DRIVE
EO
H
-
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)
E(O
H
)
F/O(UG)F/O(UG)
>
>>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>
G
G
G
G
S N
STORM SEWER
PLAN NORTH
C5.4
UTILITY LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
STORM SEWER
DRAIN TILE
SANITARY SEWER
WATER MAIN
ELECTRIC (BURIED)
ELECTRIC (OVERHEAD)
TELEPHONE (BURIED)
TELEPHONE (OVERHEAD)
TELEVISION (BURIED)
TELEVISION (OVERHEAD)
FIBER OPTIC (BURIED)
FIBER OPTIC (OVERHEAD)
COMMUNICATION (UNDEFINED)
NATURAL GAS LINE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS
STORM MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN
STORM FLARED END SECTION
CLEAN OUT (CO)
SANITARY MANHOLE
HYDRANT
GATE VALVE
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Professional Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
P. SCHROEDER
15295
N. SCHAUFENBUEL
N. SCHAUFENBUEL
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25721
MICHAEL C. AARON
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
WETLAND ELEVATION VARIABLE
FLOODPLAIN 986.0'
UPPER FFE = 998.0'
LOWER FFE = 989.0'
UPPER FFE = 998.0'
LOWER FFE = 989.0'
UPPER FFE = 1001.0'
LOWER FFE = 992.0'
UPPER FFE = 1001.0'
LOWER FFE = 992.0'
STM CB 100
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM 1003.24
S INV = 997.68
STM CB 102
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM = 1002.94
N INV = 996.41
W INV = 996.31
43 LF 15" RCP @ 3.0%
STM CB 104
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM = 995.01
S INV = 990.76
41 LF 15" RCP @ 0.5%
19
2
L
F
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
3
.
0
%
STM CB 106
48" DIA.
R-3067-V
RIM = 995.23
E INV = 990.56
N INV = 990.56
W INV = 990.46
SUMP = 986.46
92
L
F
1
8
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
5
%
STM CB 108
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM = 988.46
E INV = 985.50
SUMP = 982.50
STM CB 110
2'x3' BOX
R-3067-V
RIM = 988.72
SW INV = 984.53
STM CB 112
48" DIA.
R-3067-V
RIM = 988.73
W INV = 983.99
NE INV = 984.33
E INV = 986.00
STM CB 114
48" DIA.
R-3067-V
RIM = 988.06
N INV = 983.32
S INV = 984.1
W INV = 983.82
SUMP= 979.82
34 LF 15" RCP @ 0.5%
64
L
F
2
4
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
5
%
15" STORM APRON
INVERT = 985.2018" STORM APRON
INVERT = 990.0
24" STORM APRON
INVERT = 983.0
30 LF 15" RCP @ 1.0%
12
.
0
'
12.0'
12.0'
DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT (TYP.)
39 LF 15" RCP @ 0.5%
RE-ROUTE EXISTING WATER MAIN AROUND CATCH
BASINS AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER.
12" STORM APRON
INVERT = 985.0
12" STORM APRON
INVERT = 984.87
25 LF 12" CMP @ 0.5%
12" STORM APRON
INVERT = 986.0
UNDERGROUND STORMWATER BASIN
36" PIPE GALLERY. SEE DETAILS.
25 LF 12" RCP @ 0.5%
STM MH 101
48" DIA. PRETREATMENT
R-1642-B
RIM 993.50
N INV = 986.50
S INV = 986.50
SUMP = 982.50
STM CB 103
48" DIA.
R-2370
RIM 993.89
N INV = 986.55
STM MH 105
48" DIA. OUTLET STRUCTURE
W/ WEIR AND 6" ORIFICE
R-1642-B
RIM 989.43
N INV = 986.50
S INV = 986.25
WIER = 988.80
STM MH 111
48" DIA.
M-11
RIM = 991.50
W INV = 986.25
SE INV = 986.50
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
1 10-20-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE
99
699
5
99
4
99
3
992
991990989988
98
8
98
999
0
99
1
99
2
99
3
99
4 99
1 99
0 98
9
994
99
3
992
991
990
989
988
98
8
987
986
985
98
4
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
100
2
100
3
10
0
0
99
9
998
997
996 995
994
993
992
991
990
989
988
987
986
985
984
983
982
985
98
5
98
4
98
3
98
4
98
3
RES
UNIT 1
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 2
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 3
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 4
1800 SF
RESTAURANT
4,975 SF
EVENT VENUE
15,150 SF
PLUS
6,996 SF
BASEMENT
(STORAGE /
DATA CENTER)
RETAIL
9,600 SF
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
MBMBMBMB
>>
X
X
XXX
X
X
X XX
X
XXX
XXXXXX
XXXXX
XXXX
XX
X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XX XXX XXX X
X
XX
X
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
HIG
H
W
A
Y
5
5
CAVANAUGH DRIVE
N
TREE PRESERVATION
PLAN - OVERALL
T1.0
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
TREE PRESERVATION LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING CONTOURS
EXISTING SITE FEATURES
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SIGNIFICANT TREE REMOVAL
EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
X
WETLAND DELINEATION LINE
EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES
NORTH PARCEL PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SOUTH PARCEL PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SOUTH PARCEL EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREESNORTH PARCEL EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREES
PROJECT SIGNIFICANT TREE
PRESERVATION SUMMARY
EXISTING TREES ARE PRIMARILY PIONEERING TREES,
QUALIFYING FOR EXEMPT STATUS
1.CLEAR, GRUB, AND REMOVE ALL TREES AND VEGETATION WITHIN
THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, OR AS NOTED.
2.TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE DRIP LINE
OF TREES TO REMAIN, OR AS ILLUSTRATED, WITHIN LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND
MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT.
3.NO DETRIMENTAL CONDITIONS TO OCCUR AT TREE PRESERVATION
AREAS, SUCH AS STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT/MATERIALS, CHEMICAL
WASH, OR EXCAVATION.
4.REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR TREE REPLACEMENT LOCATION.
TREE PRESERVATION NOTES
99
6
99
5
99
4
99
3
992
991
990
98
9
988
98
8
98
999
0
99
1
99
2
99
3
99
4
99
1 99
0
98
9
994
99
3
992
991
990
989
988
988
987
986
985
98
4
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
100
2
100
3
985
98
4
98
3
MBMBMBMB
>>
>>
X
X
XXX
X
X
X XX
X
XXX
XXXXXX
XXXXX
XXXX
XX
X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XX XXX XXX X
X
XX
X
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
HIG
H
W
A
Y
5
5
TREE*6
TREE*5
TREE*4
TREE*3
TREE*2
TREE*1
TREE*28
TREE*29
TREE*30
TREE*32
TREE*31
TREE*33
TREE*77
TREE*76
TREE*74
TREE*73
TREE*75
TREE*8
TREE*9
TREE*10
TREE*14
TREE*13
TREE*12
TREE*17
TREE*16 TREE*15
TREE*19
TREE*18 TREE*20
TREE*21
TREE*22 TREE*23
TREE*24
TREE*25
TREE*26
TREE*27
TREE*34
TREE*35
TREE*36
TREE*37
TREE*38
TREE*39
TREE*40
TREE*41
TREE*42
TREE*43
TREE*44
TREE*45
TREE*11
TREE*47
TREE*46
TREE*49
TREE*48
TREE*50
TREE*51
TREE*52
TREE*53
TREE*54
TREE*55
TREE*56
TREE*63
TREE*64
TREE*65
TREE*66
TREE*67
TREE*68
TREE*69
TREE*70
TREE*71
TREE*72
TREE*62
TREE*61
TREE*60
TREE*59
TREE*58
TREE*57
TREE*7
N
TREE PRESERVATION
PLAN - SOUTH
T1.1
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
TREE PRESERVATION LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING CONTOURS
EXISTING SITE FEATURES
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SIGNIFICANT TREE REMOVAL
EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
X
WETLAND DELINEATION LINE
EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
EXISTING BARN
SOUTH PARCEL EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREES
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
100
2
100
3
10
0
0
99
9
998
997
996 995
994
993
992
991
990
989
988
987
986
985
984
983
982
985
98
4
98
3
MBMBMBMB
X
XXX X
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
TREE*78
TREE*1
TREE*69
TREE*70
TREE*71
TREE*72
N
TREE PRESERVATION
PLAN - NORTH
T1.2
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.comTREE PRESERVATION LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING CONTOURS
EXISTING SITE FEATURES
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SIGNIFICANT TREE REMOVAL
EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
X
WETLAND DELINEATION LINE
EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
NORTH PARCEL EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREES
MBMBMBMB
TR
E
E
*
7
8
TR
E
E
*
2
8
TR
E
E
*
2
9
TR
E
E
*
3
3
TR
E
E
*
6
2
TR
E
E
*
6
1
TR
E
E
*
6
0
TR
E
E
*
5
9
TR
E
E
*
5
8
TR
E
E
*
5
7
>>
RES
UNIT 1
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 2
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 3
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 4
1800 SF
RESTAURANT
4,975 SF
PLAY AREA
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
PLAY AREA
EVENT VENUE
15,150 SF
PLUS
6,996 SF
BASEMENT
(STORAGE /
DATA CENTER)
RETAIL
9,600 SF
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
PRIVATE DRIVE
S
G
G
L
G
L
-
W
E
L
L
PE
D
C
TF
O
B
+
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
-
UN
P
/
W
A
T
E
R
V
A
L
V
E
M
A
R
K
E
R
VL
T
C
C
F
O
PE
D
C E
EO
H
-
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)
F/O(UG)
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>
>>
>>
G
G
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
S S
S
CONIFEROUS TREES COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY
PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA`BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6` HT.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 7
DECIDUOUS TREES COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY
ACER RUBRUM `NORTHWOOD`NORTHWOOD MAPLE 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 5
ACER X FREEMANII 'JEFFERSRED'AUTUMN BLAZE® FREEMAN MAPLE 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 9
BETULA NIGRA `CULLY` TM HERITAGE RIVER BIRCH 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 6
CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS COMMON HACKBERRY 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 7
GINKGO BILOBA `AUTUMN GOLD` TM AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 3
GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS `HARVE`NORTHERN ACCLAIM HONEYLOCUST 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 3
QUERCUS BICOLOR SWAMP WHITE OAK 2.5" CAL.CONT.SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 7
QUERCUS X MACDANIELLI `CLEMONS` TM HERITAGE OAK 2.5" CAL.CONT.SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 3
TILIA AMERICANA `REDMOND`REDMOND AMERICAN LINDEN 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 8
ULMUS DAVIDIANA JAPONICA `DISCOVERY`DISCOVERY ELM 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 18
ORNAMENTAL TREE COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY
MALUS X `SPRING SNOW`SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE 2" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 12
MALUS X 'PINK SPIRES'PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE 2" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 13
SHRUBS COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY
ARONIA MELANOCARPA `MORTON` TM IROQUIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.16
CORNUS STOLONIFERA `FARROW`ARCTIC FIRE RED TWIG DOGWOOD #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.45
COTONEASTER LUCIDUS HEDGE COTONEASTER #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.39
POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA `GOLDFINGER`GOLDFINGER BUSH POTENTILLA #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.90
RIBES ALPINUM ALPINE CURRANT #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.70
THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'SMARAGD'EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.12
PERENNIALS AND GRASSES COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY
CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT.PLANT 3` O.C.296
HEMEROCALLIS X `STELLA SUPREME`STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY #1 CONT.PLANT 18" O.C.535
NEPETA X `WALKER`S LOW`WALKER`S LOW CATMINT #1 CONT.PLANT 24" O.C.138
RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM`GOLDSTRUM BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT.PLANT 18" O.C.113
SALVIA X SYLVESTRIS `MAY NIGHT`MAY NIGHT SAGE #1 CONT.PLANT 18" O.C.132
SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT.PLANT 24" O.C.117
PLANT SCHEDULE
N
LANDSCAPE NOTES
LANDSCAPE PLAN -
OVERALL
L1.0
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
LANDSCAPE LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
DECIDUOUS TREE
CONIFEROUS TREE
ORNAMENTAL TREE
SHRUBS/PERENNIALS
SOD
MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST (MNDOT SEED MIX 35-641)
WITH WITH CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST (MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261)
WITH CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON
BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES
WETLAND BUFFER
EXISTING TREE/SHRUBS TO REMAIN
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LANDSCAPE EDGER
LIMITS OF IRRIGATION
1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL
2.ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SOIL CONDITIONS.
3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.
4.COORDINATE ALL LANDSCAPE WORK WITH APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL.
5.ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR.
6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHlTECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN
ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING.
7.ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS:
-ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC.
-ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES.
-ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFlNG.
-CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3.
8.PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED.
9.PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES.
10.PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY.
11.PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO
THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.
12.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON B&B MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS.
13.PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES.
14.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST.
15.STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR.
16.THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED
OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS.
17.TOPSOIL (AND PLANTING SOIL) TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW), AND TO BE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS (LARGER THAN ONE INCH), SUBSOIL
DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS, UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. UTILIZE EXISTING ON-SITE TOPSOIL AS APPROPRIATE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH
TOPSOIL (PLANTING SOIL) FOR TREE, SHRUBS. AND PERENNIALS.
18.MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, LANDSCAPE BED, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS, OR AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE A MINIMUM 4-INCH
DEPTH, RED COLORED (OR AS DIRECTED), AND FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE A MINIMUM 3-INCH DEPTH, BUFF LIMESTONE (OR AS DIRECTED), AND 1.5-INCH TO
3-INCH DIAMETER. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WlTH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
19.EDGING TO BE PROVIDED BETWEEN MULCH AND LAWN TURF AREAS, OR AS INDICATED. STEEL EDGING BETWEEN LANDSCAPE BEDS AND LAWN TURF AREAS TO BE COMMERCIAL BLACK STEEL
EDGING, INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION GUIDELINES. BLACK STEEL EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH CONNECTORS AND METAL STAKES NO GREATER THAN 4-FOOT ON
CENTER AND ELEVATION BELOW LAWN MOWER CUT LINE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. INDIVIDUAL TREE AND SHRUB AREAS TO BE SPADED EDGE BETWEEN
MULCH AND LAWN TURF GRASS AREAS WITH V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION.
20.All DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND/OR HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. SEED
MIX AND APPLICATION RATE AS SPECIFIED PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS, OR AS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR RESEED ANY DAMAGED OR UNESTABLISHED
AREAS UNTIL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE AND COMPLETION OF WARRANTY.
21.PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ON SlTE, OR AS INDICATED. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PLANS, CALCULATIONS, AND SHOP DRAWINGS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION
MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR
WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. COORDINATE ALL IRRIGATION PIPES, WIRING, SLEEVING, AND OTHER COMPONENTS WITH OTHER PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS.
22.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR.
23.REPAIR ALL DAMAGE FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER.
WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15')
WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER (MIN. 20')
WETLAND
WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15')
WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER (MIN. 20')
WETLAND
IRRIGATION LIMITS (ALL SOD AND
SHRUB/PERENNIAL AREAS)
MBMBMBMB
TR
E
E
*
2
8
TR
E
E
*
2
9
TR
E
E
*
3
3
TR
E
E
*
6
2
TR
E
E
*
6
1
TR
E
E
*
6
0
TR
E
E
*
5
9
TR
E
E
*
5
8
TR
E
E
*
5
7
>>
>>
RESTAURANT
4,975 SF
PLAY AREA
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
PLAY AREA
EVENT VENUE
15,150 SF
PLUS
6,996 SF
BASEMENT
(STORAGE /
DATA CENTER)
RETAIL
9,600 SF
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
PRIVATE DRIVE
S
G
G
L
G
L
-
W
E
L
L
PE
D
C
TF
O
B
+
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
-
UN
P
/
W
A
T
E
R
V
A
L
V
E
M
A
R
K
E
R
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)
E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)F/O(UG)F/O(UG)
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>
>
G
G
G
G
F/O(U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
S S
(7) BLACK HILLS SPRUCE
(3) HERITAGE OAK (8) REDMOND AMERICAN LINDEN
(3) AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO
(3) COMMON HACKBERRY
(3) COMMON HACKBERRY
(4) SWAMP WHITE OAK
(3) PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE
(3) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE
(3) PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE
(3) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE
(3) PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE
(3) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE
(4) PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE
(3) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE
(9) AUTUMN BLAZE® FREEMAN MAPLE
(8) DISCOVERY ELM
(9) DISCOVERY ELM
(3) NORTHERN ACCLAIM HONEYLOCUST
N
LANDSCAPE PLAN -
SOUTH
L1.1
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
LANDSCAPE LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
DECIDUOUS TREE
CONIFEROUS TREE
ORNAMENTAL TREE
SHRUBS/PERENNIALS
SOD
MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST (MNDOT SEED MIX 35-641)
WITH WITH CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST (MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261)
WITH CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON
BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES
WETLAND BUFFER
EXISTING TREE/SHRUBS TO REMAIN
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LANDSCAPE EDGER
LIMITS OF IRRIGATION
SOUTH PARCEL LANDSCAPE SUMMARY
MINIMUM NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS REQUIRED
·SOUTH PARCEL LOT PERIMETER = 2,435
·1 SHADE TREE PER 50 LF LOT PERIMETER = 49 REQUIRED
·1 ORNAMENTAL TREE PER 100 LF LOT PERIMETER = 25 REQUIRED
·1 SHRUB PER 30 LF LOT PERIMETER = 82 REQUIRED
PROPOSED NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS
·EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED AND CREDITED TOWARD THE MINIMUM
REQUIRED TREES ON A SITE = 8
·PROPOSED SHADE TREE = 51
·PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE = 25
·TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED TREES = EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED +
PROPOSED TREES = 84 TREES
·PROPOSED SHRUBS = 190
·PROPOSED PERENNIALS = 1,139
WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15')
WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER (MIN. 20')
WETLAND
ALL EXISTING VEGETATION DISTURBED
BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN THE
WETLAND BUFFER TO BE RESTORED
WITH MESIC PRAIRIE SEED MIX
APPROXIMATE IRRIGATION SYSTEM
CONTROLS AND WATER SUPPLY
(REUSE ROOF WATER CISTERN AND
SUPPLEMENTAL WELL)
OVERHEAD UTILITIES
SEE SHEET L1.3 AND L1.4 FOR SHRUB
AND PERENNIAL BED PLANTING LAYOUT
IRRIGATION LIMITS (ALL SOD AND
SHRUB/PERENNIAL AREAS)
STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX WITH
CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON
BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON
SIDE SLOPESMESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST SEED MIX WITH
CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
SOD
MBMBMBMB
TR
E
E
*
7
8
RES
UNIT 1
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 2
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 3
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 4
1800 SF
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
PLAY AREA
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
PRIVATE DRIVE
G
G
L
G
L
-
TF
O
B
+
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
-
UN
P
/
W
A
T
E
R
V
A
L
V
E
M
A
R
K
E
R
EO
H
-
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(
U
G
)
E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)
E(O
H
)
F/O(UG)F/O(UG)
>
>>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>
G
G
G
G
S
(7) BLACK HILLS SPRUCE
(3) HERITAGE RIVER BIRCH
(3) SWAMP WHITE OAK
(3) NORTHWOOD MAPLE
(8) REDMOND AMERICAN LINDEN
(1) NORTHWOOD MAPLE
(3) COMMON HACKBERRY
(3) COMMON HACKBERRY
(1) NORTHWOOD MAPLE
(3) HERITAGE RIVER BIRCH
(3) NORTHERN ACCLAIM HONEYLOCUST
NORTH PARCEL LANDSCAPE SUMMARY
MINIMUM NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS REQUIRED
·4 TREES PER UNIT (16 TOTAL)
·0.2 OPACITY BUFFER YARD TO EAST AND WEST
·NO SHRUBS OR PERENNIALS REQUIRED
PROPOSED NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS
·EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED AND CREDITED TOWARD THE MINIMUM
REQUIRED TREES ON A SITE = 1
·SHADE TREE/EVERGREEN TREES = 24
·TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED TREES = EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED +
PROPOSED TREES = 25 TREES
·PROPOSED SHRUBS = 70
·PROPOSED PERENNIALS = 191
PROPOSED EAST BUFFER YARD CALCULATION
·BUFFER YARD WIDTH = 5'
·BUFFER YARD LENGTH = 225'
·BUFFER YARD POINTS PER 100 LF = 84
·BUFFER YARD POINTS REQUIRED = 225100 = 2.25*84 = 189
·BUFFER YARD POINTS PER 'TALL DECIDUOUS SHRUB' = 5
·TOTAL NUMBER OF BUFFER YARD POINTS = 113*5 = 565
PROPOSED WEST BUFFER YARD CALCULATION
·BUFFER YARD WIDTH = VARIES, ASSUME 15'
·BUFFER YARD LENGTH = 240'
·BUFFER YARD POINTS PER 100 LF = 198
·BUFFER YARD POINTS REQUIRED = 240100 = 2.40*198 = 476
·BUFFER YARD POINTS PER '2.5" CAL OVERSTORY TREE' = 50
·TOTAL NUMBER OF BUFFER YARD POINTS = 10*50 = 500
N
LANDSCAPE PLAN -
NORTH
L1.2
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
LANDSCAPE LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
DECIDUOUS TREE
CONIFEROUS TREE
ORNAMENTAL TREE
SHRUBS/PERENNIALS
SOD
MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST (MNDOT SEED MIX 35-641)
WITH WITH CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST (MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261)
WITH CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON
BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES
WETLAND BUFFER
EXISTING TREE/SHRUBS TO REMAIN
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LANDSCAPE EDGER
LIMITS OF IRRIGATION
EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIESPROPERTY LINE
IRRIGATION LIMITS (ALL SOD AND
SHRUB/PERENNIAL AREAS)
STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX WITH
CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON BOTTOM
OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES
MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST SEED MIX WITH
CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
SOD
ALL EXISTING VEGETATION DISTURBED
BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN THE
WETLAND BUFFER TO BE RESTORED
WITH MESIC PRAIRIE SEED MIX
SEE SHEET L1.4 FOR SHRUB AND
PERENNIAL BED PLANTING LAYOUT
PLAY AREA
PLUS
6,996 SF
BASEMENT
(STORAGE /
DATA CENTER)
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
W
E
L
L
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
(16) IROQUIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY
(23) GOLDSTRUM BLACK-EYED SUSAN
(27) GOLDSTRUM BLACK-EYED SUSAN
(3) EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE
(3) EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE
(3) EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE
(3) EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE
(15) ARCTIC FIRE RED
TWIG DOGWOOD
(15) ARCTIC FIRE RED
TWIG DOGWOOD
(15) ARCTIC FIRE RED
TWIG DOGWOOD
(39) HEDGE COTONEASTER
(98) WALKER`S LOW CATMINT
(40) WALKER`S LOW CATMINT
(28) GOLDFINGER BUSH POTENTILLA
(62) GOLDFINGER BUSH POTENTILLA
(45) MAY NIGHT SAGE
(24) MAY NIGHT SAGE
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(8) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(49) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(16) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(5) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(12) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(8) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(17) KARL FOERSTER
FEATHER REED GRASS
(29) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(15) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(10) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(15) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(10) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(15) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(10) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(15) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(10) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(17) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(15) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(6) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
N
LANDSCAPE
ENLARGEMENT PLAN
L1.3
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
SOUTH PARCEL LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PLAN 11
L1.3
APPROXIMATE IRRIGATION SYSTEM
CONTROLS AND WATER SUPPLY
(REUSE ROOF WATER CISTERN AND
SUPPLEMENTAL WELL)
MBMBMBMB
RES
UNIT 1
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 2
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 3
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 4
1800 SF
PRIVATE DRIVE
G
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
TF
O
B
-
E(
U
G
)
E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)
F/O(UG)
F/O(UG)
F/O(UG)F/O(UG)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
(3) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(113) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(9) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(16) PRAIRIE DROPSEED
(16) PRAIRIE DROPSEED
(18) PRAIRIE DROPSEED
(17) ALPINE CURRANT
(19) ALPINE CURRANT
(17) ALPINE CURRANT
(17) ALPINE CURRANT
PLAY AREA
PE
D
CE(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
F/
O
(
U
G
)
(20) MAY NIGHT SAGE
(63) GOLDSTRUM BLACK-EYED SUSAN
(43) MAY NIGHT SAGE
(62) GOLDFINGER BUSH POTENTILLA
(4) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(3) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(6) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(49) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(20) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(13) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(16) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(33) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(25) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(30) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(37) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(22) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS
(28) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY
(51)PRAIRIE DROPSEED N
LANDSCAPE
ENLARGEMENT PLAN
L1.4
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
SOUTH PARCEL LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PLAN 21
L1.4
NORTH PARCEL LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PLAN1
L1.4
N
METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER
METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER
METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER
METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER
METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER
METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER
4" STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGER, TOP EDGE
BELOW MOW LINE.
PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE
CENTRAL LEADER.
GUYING AND STAKING, ONLY AS REQUIRED, FOR
ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND
CONIFEROUS TREES:
TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST
BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW
GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED
WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS.
PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND
OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS
WITH 16" LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR
POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP.
TREE WRAP MATERIAL (FOR DECIDUOUS TREES) FROM
GROUND LINE UPWARD TO FIRST BRANCHES, AS
REQUIRED.
PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVER PLANT PITS -
DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK.
FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN
SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE
REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK
FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED
AT OR 2" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE
SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR
COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL
GROUND LINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE
2X BALL DIA.
SET CONTAINER ROOT SOIL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL
OR MILD COMPACTED SOIL FOR DEPTH TO MATCH FINISH
GRADE
BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL
FINISHED GRADE (LAWN)
EXISTING SOIL
SPECIFIED MULCH,
SHALL BE 1/2" BELOW
TOP OF EDGER.
PLANTING BED SOIL MIX TO BE
MINIMUM OF 4" BELOW EDGING TOP
TO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE LIP FOR
MULCH.
SPECIFIED TOPSOIL
12" STEEL STAKE,
FASTENED TO EDGER AND
ANCHORED INTO GROUND
REMOVE CONTAINER, SCARIFY SIDES, AND SET SOIL
MASS ON COMPACTED SOIL BASE MOUND, MATCHING
SHRUBS NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED GRADE
MULCH AS SPECIFIED (AND FILTER FABRIC, AS
INDICATED)
EDGING AT PLANTING BEDS, AS SPECIFIED, ADJACENT
TO LAWN AREAS
BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED PLANTING SOIL OR
AS APPROVED
SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE, DEPTH PER
CONTAINER DEPTH
2X CONT. DIA.
CLEAR ZONE TO
EDGE OF SHRUB
24"
CONCRETE WALK
(PER SITE PLAN)
DECIDUOUS / CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGER DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
LANDSCAPE DETAILS
L2.0
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
MBMBMBMB
TR
E
E
*
2
8
TR
E
E
*
2
9
TR
E
E
*
3
3
TR
E
E
*
6
1
TR
E
E
*
6
0
TR
E
E
*
5
9
TR
E
E
*
5
8
TR
E
E
*
5
7
>>
RES
UNIT 1
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 2
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 3
1800 SF
RES
UNIT 4
1800 SF
RESTAURANT
4,975 SF
PLAY AREA
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
PLAY AREA
EVENT VENUE
15,150 SF
PLUS
6,996 SF
BASEMENT
(STORAGE /
DATA CENTER)
RETAIL
9,600 SF
DAY CARE
7,500 SF
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
PRIVATE DRIVE
BOARDWALK/DECK STRINGER
BOARDWALK/DECK RAILING
EXPOSED BUILDING FOUNDATION
ATTACH BOARDWALK/DECK
TO BUILDING
BOARDWALK/DECK PLANKS
WITH 1/4" +/- GAPS BETWEEN
15'
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
D
E
L
I
N
E
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
BUILDING WALL
BOARDWALK/DECK PILE
CAP BEAM AND
ANCHOR BRACKET
LOWER BUILDING FINISHED
FLOOR ELEVATION: 989.0
12
.
2
'
+
/
-
EXISTING
GROUND
UPPER BUILDING FINISHED
FLOOR ELEVATION: 998.0
PROPOSED
GROUND
DOOR
CONCRETE
STOOP
FLOODPLAIN: 986.0'
HELICAL ANCHOR / STRUCTURAL PIER
MATCH
EXISTING GRADE
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
:
9
8
3
.
7
8
+
/
-
(
V
A
R
I
A
B
L
E
)
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
U
P
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
P
R
I
N
C
I
P
A
L
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
BOARDWALK/DECK STRINGER
BOARDWALK/DECK RAILING
EXPOSED BUILDING FOUNDATION
ATTACH BOARDWALK/DECK
TO BUILDING
BOARDWALK/DECK PLANKS
WITH 1/4" +/- GAPS BETWEEN
24.3'
BUILDING WALL
BOARDWALK/DECK PILE
CAP BEAM AND
ANCHOR BRACKET9.5
'
+
/
-
EXISTING
GROUND
UPPER BUILDING FINISHED
FLOOR ELEVATION: 998.0
PROPOSED
GROUND
SECONDARY LOWER
LEVEL CONCRETE
SERVICE ROUTE
FLOODPLAIN: 986.0'
HELICAL ANCHOR / STRUCTURAL PIER
MATCH
EXISTING GRADE
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
D
E
L
I
N
E
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
:
9
8
5
.
5
3
+
/
-
(
V
A
R
I
A
B
L
E
)
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
U
P
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
P
R
I
N
C
I
P
A
L
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
ELEVATION: 989.0
A
N
LANDSCAPE DETAILS -
BOARDWALK AND
DECK
L2.1
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
BOARDWALK/DECK SECTION LOCATION
TYPICAL BOARDWALK / DECK SECTION A - A'
TYPICAL BOARDWALK / DECK SECTION B - B'
A'
B
B'
C
C'
D
D'
E
E'
WETLAND DELINEATION LINE
WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER
(MINIMUM 30')
WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURE SETBACK (MINIMUM 15')
WETLAND DELINEATION LINE
WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER
(MINIMUM 20')
WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURE SETBACK (MINIMUM 15')
BOARDWALK/DECK STRINGER
BOARDWALK/DECK RAILING
EXPOSED BUILDING FOUNDATION
ATTACH BOARDWALK/DECK
TO BUILDING
BOARDWALK/DECK PLANKS
WITH 1/4" +/- GAPS BETWEEN
14.6'
BUILDING WALL
BOARDWALK/DECK PILE
CAP BEAM AND
ANCHOR BRACKET10
.
0
'
+
/
-
EXISTING
GROUND
BUILDING UPPER FINISHED
FLOOR ELEVATION: 998.0
HELICAL ANCHOR /
STRUCTURAL PIER
MATCH
EXISTING
GRADE
FLOODPLAIN: 986.0'
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
D
E
L
I
N
E
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
:
9
8
6
.
4
5
+
/
-
(
V
A
R
I
A
B
L
E
)
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
U
P
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
P
R
I
N
C
I
P
A
L
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
BUILDING LOWER FINISHED
FLOOR ELEVATION: 998.0
BOARDWALK/DECK STRINGER
BOARDWALK/DECK RAILING
ATTACH BOARDWALK/DECK
TO BUILDING
BOARDWALK/DECK PLANKS
WITH 1/4" +/- GAPS BETWEEN
8.0'
FLOODPLAIN 986.0' (NOT SHOWN)
BUILDING WALL 2.0
'
+
/
-
EXISTING
GROUND
BUILDING FINISHED FLOOR
ELEVATION: 998.0
HELICAL ANCHOR / STRUCTURAL PIER
MATCH
EXISTING
GRADE
8.6
'
+
/
-
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
D
E
L
I
N
E
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
:
9
8
8
.
1
4
+
/
-
(
V
A
R
I
A
B
L
E
)
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
U
P
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
P
R
I
N
C
I
P
A
L
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
HELICAL ANCHOR / STRUCTURAL PIER
10.0'(PERPENDICULARLY)
BOARDWALK/DECK STRINGER
BOARDWALK/DECK RAILING
EXPOSED BUILDING FOUNDATION
ATTACH BOARDWALK/DECK
TO BUILDING
BOARDWALK/DECK PLANKS
WITH 1/4" +/- GAPS BETWEEN
15'
FLOODPLAIN: 986.0' (NOT SHOWN)
BUILDING WALL
BOARDWALK/DECK PILE
CAP BEAM AND
ANCHOR BRACKET
6.8
'
+
/
-
EXISTING
GROUND
UPPER BUILDING FINISHED
FLOOR ELEVATION: 998.0
HELICAL ANCHOR /
STRUCTURAL PIER
MATCH
EXISTING
GRADE
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
D
E
L
I
N
E
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
:
9
8
9
.
7
6
+
/
-
(
V
A
R
I
A
B
L
E
)
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
U
P
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
P
R
I
N
C
I
P
A
L
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
PROPOSED
GROUND
ELEVATION: 994.0
LANDSCAPE DETAILS -
BOARDWALK AND
DECK
L2.2
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Landscape Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT INFO
DRAWN:
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUE RECORD
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
Print Name:
CERTIFICATION
Signature Name:
Date:Lic. No.:
PREPARED FOR
PROJECT
Print Name:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL
M
E
A
N
D
E
R
P
A
R
K
&
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
14
7
2
S
T
A
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
,
M
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
3
4
0
15295
J. FILLMORE
J. FILLMORE
P. SCHROEDER
XXXXX 25820
PAUL D. SCHROEDER
3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SUITE 100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791
PH: 763-475-0010
www.srfconsulting.com
TYPICAL BOARDWALK / DECK SECTION C - C'
TYPICAL BOARDWALK / DECK SECTION D - D'
TYPICAL BOARDWALK / DECK SECTION E - E'
PAGE 1 OF 1
Da
t
e
:
9
/
2
/
2
0
2
2
Sc
a
l
e
:
A
S
N
O
T
E
D
Revisions
#
D
a
t
e
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
M
e
a
n
d
e
r
P
a
r
k
Ch
e
c
k
e
d
B
y
:
R
o
s
s
GENERAL NOTES:
A. PULSE PRODUCTS DOES NOT ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY
FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF THIS CALCULATION OR
COMPLAINCE TO THE LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL
LIGHTNG CODES OR ORDINANCES.
B. LIGHTING LAYOUT IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS BUT ONLY TO ILLUSTRATE THE PERFORMANCE
OF THE PRODUCT.
C. ALL READINGS/CALCULATIONS SHOWN ARE SHOWN ON
OBJECTS/SURFACES.
Dr
a
w
n
B
y
:
J
e
f
f
P
l
a
t
z
k
e
,
S
a
n
d
y
A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
,
L
C
Luminaire Schedule
Symbol Qty Label Arrangement LLF
Calculation Summary
Label
Description Arr. Watts Lum. Lumens
CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min
PROPERTY LINE Illuminance
2 A3 Single 0.900 RAGNI LAMPION Modern: EVO2-ASY13-48L(2x8)3000K700mA at 22.5 mounting height. Pole:20ft on a 2.5ft raised base
Fc 0.07 0.8 0.0 N.A.N.A.
108 7811
SITE Illuminance Fc 0.93 13.8 0.0 N.A.N.A.
8 A3-B Single 0.900 RAGNI LAMPION Modern: EVO2-ASY13-48L(2x8)3000K700mA at 15ft mounting height. Pole:15ft 108 7811
PARKING LOT Illuminance
1 A4
Fc
Single 0.900 RAGNI LAMPION Modern: EVO2-ASY14-48L(2x8)3000K700mA at 22.5 mounting height. Pole:20ft on a 2.5ft raised base 108 7809
2.17 12.6 0.8 2.71 15.75
12 A5-2 Back-Back 0.900 RAGNI LAMPION Modern: EVO2-CIR06-48L(2x8)3000K700mA at 22.5 mounting height. Pole:20ft on a 2.5ft raised base 216 7801
Plan View
Scale: 1 inch= 50 Ft.
NO PARKING
NO PARKING
4,
9
7
5
S
F
RE
S
T
A
U
R
A
N
T
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
231 TO
TAL PARKING
SPACES
PLAY AREA
PL
A
Y
A
R
E
A
(S
T
O
R
A
G
E
/
D
A
T
A
C
E
N
T
E
R
)
6,
9
9
6
S
F
B
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
PL
U
S
15
,
1
5
0
S
F
EV
E
N
T
V
E
N
U
E
9,
6
0
0
S
F
RE
T
A
I
L
7,
5
0
0
S
F
DA
Y
C
A
R
E
NO PARKING
NO PARKING
MBMBMBMB
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A5-2
A3
A3
A4
A3-B
A3-B
A3-B
A3-B
A3-B
A3-B
A3-B
A3-B
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 1.0 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.0 2.6 1.8 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.2 3.1 12.6 7.3 3.2 2.8 3.8 4.8 2.4 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.3 2.3 3.6 3.6 3.5 2.3 2.3 3.5 4.6 2.8 1.4 0.5 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.2 1.5 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 2.1 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.8 2.5 2.9 2.4 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.0 2.6 13.8 5.0 2.4 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.8 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.5 2.8 4.1 4.1 2.9 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.6 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.6 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.6 1.6 1.3 0.4 0.3 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.9 11.2 4.8 2.6 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.5 2.1 1.7 0.5 0.4 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.3 2.8 4.6 4.8 3.3 2.0 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.7 2.2 3.4 4.1 2.8 2.2 1.8 1.4 1.5 1.7 3.1 3.0 0.8 0.5 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.5 2.6 2.6 2.3 1.8 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.6 2.0 3.8 4.5 0.9 0.5 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.8 2.7 2.2 0.7 0.4 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.6 3.9 3.7 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.2 0.5 0.3 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.2 2.1 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.0 0.4 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.6 2.6 2.3 1.9 1.8 1.8 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.2 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.0 1.5 2.1 3.0 4.0 2.7 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.2 2.6 3.4 4.4 3.1 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.1 1.8 1.3 0.6 0.3 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.4 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.5 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.6 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.0 1.7 0.6 0.3 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.5 3.0 4.4 3.8 2.7 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.5 2.2 0.8 0.5 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.2 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.2 3.3 4.1 1.0 0.6 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.6 3.2 2.8 2.5 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.4 2.2 2.5 3.4 6.0 1.2 0.6 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.7 2.3 3.2 4.2 3.0 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.7 3.3 4.4 3.4 2.6 2.3 2.3 2.8 3.0 0.9 0.5 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.7 3.0 3.3 2.8 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.3 1.8 0.7 0.4 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.9 3.3 3.3 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.5 0.7 0.3 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.9 1.2 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.6 3.0 4.2 3.8 2.9 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 1.8 1.3 0.8 0.3 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.1 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 1.7 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.7 2.1 2.6 2.9 3.2 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.2 1.7 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.7 4.1 4.1 2.9 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.7 3.4 4.2 2.8 2.1 1.6 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.3 1.8 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.4 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.7 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.3 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.5 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.8 3.9 3.5 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.3 2.0 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.9 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.5 2.8 4.0 2.9 2.4 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.3 2.9 2.9 2.1 1.9 2.3 2.9 4.0 2.6 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.9 3.0 3.2 2.1 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.1 3.1 5.4 2.8 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.9 6.5 10.9 3.7 1.4 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.8 5.4 9.2 1.6 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 2.3 2.3 3.1 2.3 1.9 1.7 2.1 2.1 2.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.3 2.2 3.2 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.6 4.2 5.6 3.6 2.1 1.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.0 1.5 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 3.3 7.2 3.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.2 1.6 1.2 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.2 2.0 3.4 2.9 3.0 2.2 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.6 2.0 1.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.4 1.9 3.5 9.2 6.8 2.6 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.9 3.0 1.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.8 1.6 1.7 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.7 2.3 5.4 1.3 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 2.9 12.8 1.7 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 2.3 3.3 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.9 1.5 1.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 1.0 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
1 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.5 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
0.25 fc
UP
BASEMENT
GARBAGE
BATHROOM
ELEVATOR
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale: 1/8" 1'-0"
A100
VE
N
U
E
B
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
1/8" 1'-0"1 VENUE BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
DN
3,380 SF
CONSERVATORY
KITCHEN
ENTRY
VESTIBULE
4,610 SF
BALLROOM
SUITE
MENS
LOUNGE
ELEVATOR
SUITE
SUITE
SUITE
WOMENS
WOMENS
MENS
FOYER
BAR
SERVICE
7' -
5
"
7' -
3
3
/
3
2
"
HALL
HALL
2,870 SF
RETAIL
TRASH
VESTIBULE
OPEN TO BELOW
OPEN TO BELOW
PLAZA
BOARDWALK
LOUNGE PLAZA
GROTTO
BOARDWALK
MAIN ENTRY
PLAZA
DR
O
P
O
F
F
COURTYARD
1' -
0
"
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale: 1/8" 1'-0"
A101
VE
N
U
E
M
A
I
N
L
E
V
E
L
P
L
A
N
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
1/8" 1'-0"1 VENUE MAIN LEVEL PLAN
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
2,870 SF
RETAIL
3,380 SF
RETAIL
2,870 SF
RETAIL
4,760 SF
RESTAURANT
TRASH
TRASH
PLAZA
DR
O
P
O
F
F
1' -
0
"
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale: 1/8" 1'-0"
A102
CO
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
S
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
1/8" 1'-0"1 RETAIL FLOOR PLAN
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
UPDN
DN
UP
UP
BED
LIVING
WIC
BATH
GARAGE
KITCHEN
MASTER
WICBATH
BATH BED
ENTRY
DINING
HALL
GLASS RM
TERRACE ROOF
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale: 1/4" 1'-0"
A103
DU
P
L
E
X
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
S
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
S
t
a
t
u
s
1/4" 1'-0"1 BASEMENT
1/4" 1'-0"2 MAIN LEVEL
1/4" 1'-0"3 ROOF
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale:
A200
VE
N
U
E
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
WEST
SOUTH
EAST
NORTH
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
1/8" 1'-0"
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale:
A201
RE
T
A
I
L
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
RETAIL SOUTH
RETAIL NORTH
DAYCARE SOUTH DAYCARE EAST
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
1/8" 1'-0"
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale:
A202
DU
P
L
E
X
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
EAST
WEST
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale:
A300
PE
R
S
P
E
C
T
I
V
E
R
E
N
D
E
R
I
N
G
S
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
RETAIL BOARDWALK PARKING
RETAIL CROSSWALK MAIN ENTRY
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale:
A301
PE
R
S
P
E
C
T
I
V
E
R
E
N
D
E
R
I
N
G
S
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
CONSERVATORY MAIN ENTRY
GROTTOBALLROOM PLAZA
BALLROOM LOUNGE PLAZA
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale:
A302
PE
R
S
P
E
C
T
I
V
E
R
E
N
D
E
R
I
N
G
S
09
/
0
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
FRONT OF DUPLEX
REAR OF DUPLEX
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
\//\
VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE
Plo
t
S
t
a
m
p
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Architect
Pablo Villamil
(612) 388-6622
PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com
Owner
Chris Pederson
Medina Ventures LLC
MadMrChristopher@gmail.com
General Contractor
Kalcon LLC
(612) 244-1141
KalconLLC.com
Scale:
G000
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
B
O
A
R
D
10
/
1
9
/
2
2
Co
n
c
e
p
t
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Da
t
e
WHITE PLASTER
BLACK BRICK
BAR WOOD PANEL
CONCRETE
WOOD BOARDWALK
BLACK METAL RAILING
BOARDFORMED CONCRETE
RUSTIC GAP WOOD
CORTEN STEEL
STEEL
WOOD
WOOD
BLACK METAL WINDOW
CONCRETE SHOWING FORMWORK AND TIES
WOOD
STEEL
BLACK METAL WINDOW
BLACK BRICK
STONE
TILE
METAL WINDOW
STONE
BLACK METAL
WOOD
BLACK METAL HARDWARE
WOOD PANEL
TINTED CONCRETE FLOOR
BOARDFORMED CONCRETE
WOOD BENCH
WOOD BOARDWALK
CONCRETE SHOWING FORMWORK AND TIES
WOOD
WOOD DOOR
BLACK METAL FRAME
PLASTER
TINTED CONCRETE FLOOR
WOOD PLANTER GREEN WALL
BLACK METAL RAILING
RUSTIC WOOD
WOOD
BLACK METAL
RUSTIC WOOD
BLACK METAL
BLACK METAL
YELLOW WOOD
BLACK METAL STANDING SEAM ROOF
VENUE DUPLEX
DAYCARE
MIXED USE
Conservatory Close Up South Conservatory Close Up South Night
Boardwalk Convervatory South View On Boardwalk Looking Southwest Boardwalk NightBoardwalk View Facing East
Boardwalk View
Coming Down Boardwalk WestLooking Down from Boardwalk
Conservatory View Facing Out South View from Highway 55 1
View from Highway 55 2
View from Highway 55 1 Night
View from Highway 55 2 Night
Southwest Water Feature
Design Board
Meander Park & Boardwalk
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Erin Barnhart, Finance Director
DATE: December 1, 2022
SUBJ: Conduit Bond – St. Therese of Corcoran
Enclosed in the packet is an explanatory letter from Kennedy & Graven and resolution for approval of
bond documents.
Bond documents are on file at City Hall and available for further inspection if so desired.
Staff recommends the administrative fee revenue of $50,000 be allocated to the Equipment Fund.
Action Needed
Motion to approve Resolution Authorizing Issuance, Sale and Delivery of Conduit Revenue Obligations
Agenda Item #9D
Offices in
Minneapolis
Saint Paul
St. Cloud
470 U.S. Bank Plaza
200 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300 telephone
(612) 337-9310 fax
www.kennedy-graven.com
Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer
GINA FIORINI
Attorney at Law
Direct Dial (612) 337-9210 Email: gfiorini@kennedy-graven.com
November 29, 2022
Erin Barnhart, Finance Director
City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340-9790
Re: Resolution providing approval to the issuance of the revenue obligation proposed to be issued by the
City of Medina for the benefit of Saint Therese of Corcoran, LLC
Dear Erin,
As you know, Saint Therese of Corcoran, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, whose sole member is
Saint Therese Communities, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the
“Borrower”), has requested that the City of Medina (the “City”) issue its revenue obligation in the maximum
principal amount of $10,000,000 (the “Medina Note”) in order to finance the costs of acquiring, constructing,
and equipping a senior living campus consisting of approximately 99 independent living apartments, 34 assisted
living apartments and 20 memory care apartments, and related common areas, facilities, infrastructure
improvements, and amenities, to be located at 19800 79th Place in the City of Corcoran, Minnesota (the
“Project”). The Borrower is also requesting that the City of Corcoran, Minnesota (the “City of Corcoran”)
issue two revenue obligations in the approximate principal amounts of $8,200,000 and $28,800,000
(collectively, the “Corcoran Notes”) in 2022 and 2023 to finance a portion of the costs of the Project.
The City Council is required to conduct a public hearing on the issuance of the Medina Note, which will be
held on December 6, 2022. Following the public hearing, the City Council is being asked to adopt the attached
resolution to provide final approval to the issuance of the Medina Note and approve the execution and delivery
of related loan documents, including a joint powers agreement with the City of Corcoran.
The Medina Note will be issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended, and Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 471.59 and 471.656, as amended. If the City agrees to issue the Medina Note, the Borrower
will use the proceeds of the Medina Note, along with the proceeds of the Corcoran Notes to finance the Project,
finance capitalized interest during the construction of the Project, if needed, fund any required reserves, and
pay costs of issuance of the Medina Note and the Corcoran Notes (together, the “Notes”). The Project financed
with the proceeds of the Notes will be owned and operated by the Borrower or its affiliates. The City of
Corcoran, as the municipality in which the Project is located, has provided “host approval” to the issuance of
the Medina Note and has approved the issuance of the Corcoran Notes to finance the Project.
The Medina Note is proposed to be privately placed with Bremer Bank, National Association, a national
banking association (the “Lender”) and will be issued as a conduit revenue bond secured solely by the revenues
derived from a loan agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) to be executed by the City and the Borrower and from
602582v2BL405-27 2
other security provided by the Borrower, including a mortgage, a security agreement and a guaranty. The
Medina Note will not constitute a general or moral obligation of the City and will not be secured by or payable
from any property or assets of the City (other than the interests of the City in the Loan Agreement) and will not
be secured by any taxing power of the City. The Medina Note will not be subject to any debt limitation imposed
on the City and the issuance of the Medina Note will not have any adverse impact on the credit rating of the
City, even in the event that Borrower encounters financial difficulties with respect to the Project.
The Medina Note is proposed to be issued as a tax-exempt obligation, the interest on which is not includable
in gross income for federal income tax purposes. Tax-exempt obligations are usually not eligible for purchase
by banks and other financial institutions, but Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the “Code”), permits each issuer of tax-exempt obligations to designate up to $10,000,000 of
tax-exempt bonds as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” (sometimes referred to as “bank-qualified bonds”) that
are eligible for purchase by banks and other financial institutions. In order to issue bank-qualified bonds, the
issuer must not expect to issue more than $10,000,000 of bonds (other than private activity bonds that are not
qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) in a calendar year. The Borrower has requested that the City designate the Medina
Note as a qualified tax-exempt obligation for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code.
Under the terms of the Loan Agreement, the Borrower will pay all of the City’s fees and expenses and pay the
City its administrative fee required for bond issuance.
I will attend the City Council meeting on December 6, 2022, and can answer any questions that may arise
during the meeting. Please contact me with any questions you may have prior to the City Council meeting.
Sincerely,
Gina Fiorini
1
CR100\24\835859.v2
December 6, 2022
CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2022-__
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF CONDUIT
REVENUE OBLIGTIONS TO FINANCE A COMBINATION MULTIFAMILY
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND HEALTHCARE FACILITY IN THE CITY OF
CORCORAN, MINNESOTA FOR THE BENEFIT OF SAINT THERESE OF
CORCORAN, LLC; APPROVING THE FORMS OF AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF THE OBLIGATIONS AND CERTAIN
RELATED DOCUMENTS; ADOPTING A HOUSING PROGRAM; AND
TAKING OTHER ACTIONS RELATED THERETO
WHEREAS, the City of Medina, Minnesota (the “City” or “Issuer”) is a statutory city and
political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, duly organized and existing under the Constitution and
laws of the State of Minnesota.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the “Act”), the City is
authorized to carry out the public purposes described in the Act by issuing revenue bonds or other
obligations to finance a multifamily housing development and a development consisting of a combination
of a multifamily housing development and a new or existing health care facility located within its
boundaries, and as a condition to the issuance of such obligations, adopt a housing program providing the
information required by Section 462C.03, subdivision 1a, of the Act.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.656, as amended, a municipality may
issue obligations to finance the acquisition or improvement of property located outside of the corporate
boundaries of such municipality if the obligations are issued under a joint powers agreement between the
municipality issuing the obligations and the municipality in which the property to be acquired or
improved is located. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, as amended, by the terms of a joint
powers agreement entered into through action of their governing bodies, two or more municipalities may
jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting parties or any similar powers,
including those which are the same except for the territorial limits within which they may be exercised
and the joint powers agreement may provide for the exercise of such powers by one or more of the
participating governmental units on behalf of the other participating units.
WHEREAS, in the issuance of revenue obligations and in the making of a loan to finance a
development, the City may exercise any of the powers that the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency may
exercise under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462A, as amended.
WHEREAS, under Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
“Code”), prior to the issuance of the Series 2022B Note (as described below), the City Council must
conduct a public hearing after one publication of notice in a newspaper circulating generally in the City at
least 7 days before the hearing. Under Section 462C.04, subdivision 2 of the Act, a public hearing must
be held on the Housing Program after one publication of notice in a newspaper circulating generally in the
City at least 15 days before the hearing.
WHEREAS, Saint Therese of Corcoran, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the
“Borrower”), the sole member of which is Saint Therese Communities, a Minnesota nonprofit
corporation and tax-exempt organization (the “Sole Member”), has requested that the City issue its
revenue notes, in one or more series (including without limitation the Series 2022B Note described
2
CR100\24\835859.v2
December 6, 2022
below) under the Act and lend the proceeds thereof to the Borrower to (i) finance a portion of the costs of
the acquisition, construction, and equipping of a senior living campus consisting of approximately 99
independent living apartments, 34 assisted living apartments and 20 memory care apartments, and related
common areas, facilities, infrastructure improvements, and amenities, to be located at 19800 79th Place in
the City of Corcoran, Minnesota (the “Project”); (ii) fund any required reserves; (iii) finance capitalized
interest, if necessary; and (iv) pay the costs of issuing the Series 2022B Note, if necessary.
WHEREAS, in addition to the proceeds of the Series 2022B Note, the Borrower has proposed to
apply the proceeds of revenue notes proposed to be issued by City of Corcoran, Minnesota (the “Host
City”), in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $8,200,000, designated as the Senior Housing
Revenue Note (Saint Therese of Corcoran Project), Series 2022A, and in the aggregate principal amount
currently anticipated not to exceed $28,800,000, designated as the Senior Housing Revenue Note (Saint
Therese of Corcoran Project), Series 2023, to finance the remaining costs of the acquisition, construction,
and equipping of the Project.
WHEREAS, the City has prepared a housing program (the “Housing Program”) to authorize the
issuance by the City of tax-exempt revenue notes in one or more series to be issued to finance the Project.
WHEREAS, on November 10, 2022, the City Council of the Host City held a duly noticed public
hearing with respect to providing host approval for the issuance of the Series 2022B Note pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59 and Section 147(f) of the Code and adopted a resolution approving
the issuance of the Series 2022B Note and a Joint Powers Agreement (the “Joint Powers Agreement
Agreement”) between the Host City and the Issuer; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing on the Housing Program and the Project was held by the City on
this date, following duly published notice in the Crow River News, a newspaper of general circulation in
the City, with respect to: (i) the required public hearing under Section 147(f) of the Code; (ii) the required
public hearing under Section 462C.04, subdivision 2 of the Act; (iii) the Housing Program; and (iv)
approval of the issuance of the Series 2022B Note.
WHEREAS, during said public hearing a reasonable opportunity was provided for interested
individuals to express their views, both orally and in writing.
WHEREAS, this resolution (“Resolution”) constitutes a reimbursement resolution and an official
intent to reimburse expenditures with respect to the Project from the proceeds of tax-exempt revenue
bonds in accordance with the provisions of Treasury Regulations, Section 1.150-2.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota
(the “City Council”), as follows:
SECTION 1. LEGAL AUTHORIZATION AND FINDINGS.
1.1 Findings. The City hereby finds, determines and declares as follows:
(a) The issuance and sale of the Senior Housing Revenue Note (Saint Therese of
Corcoran Project), Series 2022B (the “Series 2022B Note”), in the original aggregate principal
amount not to exceed $10,000,000, pursuant to the Act is in the best interest of the City, and the
City hereby determines to issue the Series 2022B Note and to sell the Series 2022B Note to
Bremer Bank, National Association, a national banking association, or another “qualified
institutional buyer” and “accredited investor,” as defined in Section 2.5 hereof, selected by the
Borrower (the “Lender”), under the terms and conditions of a Note Purchase Agreement (the
3
CR100\24\835859.v2
December 6, 2022
“Series 2022B Purchase Agreement”), between the City, the Borrower, and the Lender. The City
will loan the proceeds of the Series 2022B Note (the “Loan”) to the Borrower in order to finance
a portion of the cost of the Project.
(b) Pursuant to a Loan Agreement, dated as of or after December 1, 2022 (the “Loan
Agreement”), to be entered into between the City and the Borrower, the Borrower will agree to
repay the Loan in specified amounts and at specified times sufficient to pay in full when due the
principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Series 2022B Note. In addition, the Loan
Agreement contains provisions relating to the construction, maintenance and operation of the
Project, indemnification, insurance, and other agreements and covenants which are required or
permitted by the Act and which the City and Borrower deem necessary or desirable for the
financing of the Project.
(c) Pursuant to an Assignment of Loan Agreement, dated as of or after December 1,
2022 (the “Assignment of Loan Agreement”), between the City, the Borrower, and the Lender,
the City will pledge and grant a security interest in all of its rights, title, and interest in the Loan
Agreement to the Lender (except for certain rights of indemnification and to reimbursement for
certain costs and expenses).
(d) The obligations of the Borrower under the Loan Agreement and payment of
amounts due under Series 2022B Note will be secured by certain security instruments required by
the Lender and in forms authorized by the Borrower to be executed by or on behalf of the
Borrower in favor of the Lender, which may include: (i) a mortgage or security agreements
granting a mortgage lien or security interest with respect to the Project or any portion thereof to
the Lender or to the City; (ii) one or more collateral assignments of the contracts between the
Borrower and the architect and contractor with respect to the Project; (iii) one or more security
agreements, guaranty agreements, and indemnity agreements; and (iv) other security documents
that are intended to ensure timely payment of the Loan and the Series 2022B Note (collectively,
the “Security Documents”).
(e) As determined by the Lender, the proceeds of the Series 2022B Note may be
disbursed pursuant to a Disbursing Agreement (the “Disbursing Agreement”) by and among the
Lender, Borrower and a title insurance company.
(f) The Series 2022B Note shall be a special, limited revenue obligation of the City
payable solely from the revenues and proceeds derived from the Loan Agreement and mortgage
or other Security Document. The Series 2022B Note shall not to be payable from nor charged
upon any funds of the City other than the revenues pledged to its payment, nor is the City subject
to any liability thereon; the Series 2022B Note shall not constitute a general or moral obligation
of the City; no holders of the Series 2022B Note shall ever have the right to compel any exercise
of the taxing power of the City to pay any of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the
Series 2022B Note; the Series 2022B Note shall not constitute a debt of the City within the
meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; the Series 2022B Note shall not constitute
nor give rise to a pecuniary liability of the City or a charge against its general credit or taxing
powers; the Series 2022B Note shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or
equitable, upon any property of the City, and the Series 2022B Note shall recite that the Series
2022B Note, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenues pledged to the
payment thereof and that the Series 2022B Note shall not constitute a debt of the City within the
meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. The Series 2022B Note shall contain a
recital that it is issued pursuant to the Act and such recital shall be conclusive evidence of the
validity and regularity of the issuance thereof.
4
CR100\24\835859.v2
December 6, 2022
(g) It is desirable, feasible and consistent with the objects and purposes of the Act to
issue the Series 2022B Note for the purpose of financing a portion of the costs of the Project.
(h) The purpose of the Project is, and the effect thereof will be, to promote the public
welfare by the acquisition, construction and equipping of a facility for use as a senior housing
development designed primarily for occupancy by elderly and handicapped persons.
(i) The Act authorizes (i) the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project,
(ii) the issuance and sale of the Series 2022B Note, (iii) the execution and delivery by the City of
related documents and the performance of all covenants and agreements of the City contained
therein, and (iv) the performance of all other acts and things required under the constitution and
laws of the State of Minnesota to make the Series 2022B Note and such agreement valid and
binding obligations of the City in accordance with its terms.
(j) It is desirable that the Borrower be authorized, subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in the Loan Agreement, which terms and conditions the City determines to be
necessary, desirable and proper, to complete the acquisition, construction, equipping and
installation of the Project by such means as shall be available to the Borrower and in the manner
determined by the Borrower, and with or without advertisement for bids as required for the
acquisition and installation of municipal facilities.
(k) The payments under the Loan Agreement are fixed to produce revenue sufficient
to provide for the prompt payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest the Series 2022B
Note, as the case may be, when due, and the Loan Agreement also provides that the Borrower is
required to pay all expenses of the operation and maintenance of the Project, including, but
without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insurance against all liability for injury to
persons or property arising from the operation thereof, and all taxes and special assessments
levied upon or with respect to the Project and payable during the terms of the Loan Agreement.
(l) The City hereby finds, determines and declares that it is in the public interest of
the residents of the City that the Project be undertaken in order to further the public purposes of
increasing the supply of decent, safe, and sanitary rental housing units available to residents of
the City.
1.2 Authorization and Ratification of Project. The City does hereby authorize the Borrower,
in accordance with the provisions of the Act and subject to the terms and conditions imposed by the
Lender, to provide for the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project by such means as shall
be available to the Borrower and in the manner determined by the Borrower, and without advertisement
for bids as may be required for the construction and acquisition of other municipal facilities; and the City
hereby ratifies, affirms, and approves all actions heretofore taken by the Borrower consistent with and in
anticipation of such authority.
SECTION 2. THE SERIES 2022B NOTE.
2.1 Authorized Maximum Amount, Form of Note and Interest Rate.
(a) Subject to approval by the City, the Series 2022B Note is hereby approved and
shall be issued pursuant to this Resolution in substantially the form on file with the City
Administrator of the City (the “City Administrator”) with such appropriate variations, omissions
and insertions as are necessary and appropriate and are permitted or required by this Resolution,
5
CR100\24\835859.v2
December 6, 2022
and in accordance with the further provisions hereof. the Series 2022B Note shall be issued in a
denomination equal to its entire principal amount and shall be numbered No. R-1 and upward.
The Series 2022B Note shall mature in the years and amounts and be subject to redemption as
therein specified, as such may be modified by agreement of the Lender, Borrower and the City;
and the aggregate principal amount of the Series 2022B Note that may be outstanding hereunder
is expressly limited to $10,000,000. The actual principal amount of the Series 2022B Note shall
be determined by the agreement of the Lender and the Borrower and the City, as evidenced by the
execution of the Series 2022B Note by the Mayor of the City and the City Administrator (the
“Authorized Officers”).
(b) The Series 2022B Note will bear interest at the fixed or variable rates determined
by the Borrower and the Lender and set forth in the Series 2022B Note as executed by the
Authorized Officers; provided that such rates shall be subject to adjustment pursuant to the terms
as set forth in the Series 2022B Note, this Resolution, the Loan Agreement, the Assignment of
Loan Agreement, the Purchase Agreement, or the Security Documents. The sale of the Series
2022B Note to the Lender at a purchase price equal to its stated amount is hereby accepted.
2.2 The Series 2022B Note. The Series 2022B Note shall be dated as of the date of delivery
to the Lender, shall be payable at the time and in the manner and shall be subject to such other terms and
conditions as are set forth therein.
2.3 Execution of Series 2022B Note. The Series 2022B Note shall be executed on behalf of
the City by the Authorized Officers. In case any Authorized Officer whose signature shall appear on the
Series 2022B Note shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Series 2022B Note, such
signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if such signatory had
remained in office until delivery. In the event of the absence or disability of any Authorized Officers,
such officer(s) of the City as, in the opinion of the City Attorney, may act in their behalf, shall without
further act or authorization of the City Council execute and deliver the Series 2022B Note.
2.4 Disposition of the Proceeds of the Series 2022B Note. Upon delivery of the Series
2022B Note to the Lender, the Lender shall, on behalf of the City, disburse the purchase price thereof for
payment of Project costs in accordance with the terms of the Loan Agreement and any applicable
Disbursing Agreement.
2.5 Ownership of the Series 2022B Note. The Lender or holder of any of the Series 2022B
Note will be required to execute and deliver an investor letter or certification to the City, confirming that
the Lender or holder is either (a) a “qualified institutional buyer” as defined in Rule 144A promulgated
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), that purchases the Series 2022B Note for
its own account or for the account of a qualified institutional buyer, or (b) an “accredited investor” as
defined in Regulation D promulgated under the 1933 Act, that purchases the Series 2022B Note for its
own account and without registration under state or other securities laws, pursuant to an exemption for
such sale. The City may deem and treat the person in whose name the Series 2022B Note is last registered
in the Register and by notation on the Series 2022B Note, whether or not the Series 2022B Note shall be
overdue, as the absolute owner of the Series 2022B Note for the purpose of receiving payment of or on
account of the Principal Balance, redemption price or interest and for all other purposes whatsoever, and
the City shall not be affected by any notice to the contrary.
2.6 Registration of Transfer. The City will cause to be kept at the office of the City
Administrator a register (the “Register”) for the Series 2022B Note in which, subject to such reasonable
regulations as it may prescribe, the City shall provide for the registration of transfers of ownership of the
Series 2022B Note. The Series 2022B Note shall be initially registered in the name of the Lender and,
6
CR100\24\835859.v2
December 6, 2022
subject to the limitations on transfer provided herein, shall be transferable upon the Register for such Note
by the Lender in person or by its agent duly authorized in writing, upon surrender of such Note together
with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the City Administrator, duly executed by the Lender
or its duly authorized agent. The City will require, as a precondition to any transfer, that the transferee
provide to the City an investor letter or certification in a form satisfactory to the City and other evidence
satisfactory to the City that the transferee is a financial institution or other accredited investor under the
securities laws. The following form of assignment shall be sufficient for purposes of assigning the Series
2022B Note.
For value received ___________ hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto
________________ the attached Note of the City of Medina, Minnesota, and does hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint ___________________ attorney to transfer said Note
on the books of said City, with full power of substitution in the premises. The
undersigned certifies that the transfer is made in accordance with the provisions of
Sections 2.5, 2.6 and 2.8 of the resolution authorizing the issuance of the Note.
Dated:__________________
Registered Owner
Upon such transfer the City Administrator shall note the date of registration and the name and address of
the successor Lender in the applicable Register for such Note and in the registration blank appearing on
such Note; subject to receipt of a purchaser letter or certification as required by Section 2.8 hereof.
2.7 Mutilated, Lost or Destroyed Note. In case the Series 2022B Note shall become
mutilated or be destroyed or lost, the City shall, if not then prohibited by law, cause to be executed and
delivered a new Note of like outstanding principal amount, number and tenor in exchange and substitution
for and upon cancellation of such mutilated Note, or in lieu of and in substitution for such Note destroyed
or lost, upon the payment by the Lender of the reasonable expenses and charges of the City in connection
therewith, and in the case of a Note destroyed or lost, the filing with the City of evidence satisfactory to
the City with indemnity satisfactory to it. If the mutilated, destroyed or lost Note has already matured or
been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Note prior
to payment.
2.8 Limitation on Note Transfers. The Series 2022B Note will be issued to a “qualified
institutional buyer” or an “accredited investor” and without registration under state or other securities
laws, pursuant to an exemption for such sale; and accordingly, the Series 2022B Note may not be
assigned or transferred in whole or part, except to another “accredited investor” or “qualified institutional
buyer.” The City will require, as a precondition to any transfer, that the transferee provide to the City an
investor letter or certification substantially in the form required of, and delivered upon issuance of the
Series 2022B Note by the Lender in accordance with Sections 2.5 and 2.6 hereof and other evidence
satisfactory to the City that the transferee is a “qualified institutional buyer” or other “accredited
investor.”
2.9 Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligation. In order to designate the Series 2022B Note as a
“qualified tax-exempt obligation” within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code, the City makes
the following factual statements and representations: (i) the Series 2022B Note is a “qualified 501(c)(3)
bond” as such term is defined in Section 145 of the Code; (ii) the City hereby designates the Series 2022B
Note as a “qualified tax-exempt obligation” for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; (iii) the
reasonably anticipated amount of tax-exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds that do not
7
CR100\24\835859.v2
December 6, 2022
constitute qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) which will be issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the
City) during calendar year 2022 shall not exceed $10,000,000; and (iv) no other obligations other than the
Note are expected to be issued by the City during calendar year 2022 and no obligations other than the
Note have been designated as qualified tax-exempt obligations by the City for purposes of Section
265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
SECTION 3. MISCELLANEOUS.
3.1 Severability. If any provision of this Resolution shall be held or deemed to be or shall, in
fact, be inoperative or unenforceable as applied in any particular case in any jurisdiction or jurisdictions
or in all jurisdictions or in all cases because it conflicts with any provisions of any constitution or statute
or rule or public policy, or for any other reason, such circumstances shall not have the effect of rendering
the provision in question inoperative or unenforceable in any other case or circumstance, or of rendering
any other provision or provisions contained herein invalid, inoperative, or unenforceable to any extent
whatever. The invalidity of any one or more phrases, sentences, clauses or paragraphs contained in this
Resolution shall not affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or any part thereof.
3.2 Authentication of Transcript. The officers of the City are directed to furnish to Bond
Counsel certified copies of this Resolution and all documents referred to herein, and affidavits or
certificates as to all other matters which are reasonably necessary to evidence the validity of the Series
2022B Note. All such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished,
shall constitute recitals of the City as to the correctness of all statements contained therein.
3.3 Authorization to Execute Agreements. The forms of the proposed Series 2022B Note,
the Loan Agreement, the Assignment of Loan Agreement, the Joint Powers Agreement, and the Purchase
Agreement (collectively, and together with any Disbursing Agreement, the Security Documents, and such
other documents as Bond Counsel considers appropriate in connection with the issuance of the Series
2022B Note, the “Financing Documents”) are hereby approved in substantially the forms on file with the
City Administrator, together with such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and
such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate
and approved by Bond Counsel prior to the execution of the documents, and the Authorized Officers are
authorized to execute, in the name of and on behalf of the City, the Financing Documents to which the
City is a party. The Authorized Officials and the Finance Director are further authorized to execute any
consents and such other documents or certificates as are necessary or appropriate in connection with the
issuance, sale, and delivery of the Series 2022B Note, including without limitation various certificates of
the City, the Information Return for Tax-Exempt Private Activity Bond Issues, Form 8038, an
endorsement of the City to the Borrower Tax Certificate, a books and records letter related to any interest
rate swap entered into by the Borrower and similar documents. In the event of the absence or disability of
any of the Authorized Officers, such officers of the City as, in the opinion of the City Attorney, may act
on their behalf shall without further act or authorization of the City Council do all things and execute all
instruments and documents required to be done or executed by such absent or disabled officers. The
execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be
conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. The
electronic signature of a party to the Financing Documents, including all acknowledgements,
authorizations, directions, waivers and consents thereto (or any amendment or supplement thereto) shall
be as valid as an original signature of such party and shall be effective to bind such party to the Financing
Documents. Any electronically signed Financing Documents shall be deemed (i) to be “written” or “in
writing,” (ii) to have been signed, and (iii) to constitute a record established and maintained in the
ordinary course of business and an original written record when printed from electronic files. For
purposes hereof, (i) “electronic signature” means (a) a manually signed original signature that is then
transmitted by electronic means or (b) a signature obtained through DocuSign, Adobe or a similarly
8
CR100\24\835859.v2
December 6, 2022
digitally auditable signature gathering process; (ii) “transmitted by electronic means” means sent in the
form of a facsimile or sent via the internet as a portable document format (“pdf”) or other replicating
image attached to an electronic mail or internet message; and, (iii) “electronically signed document”
means a document transmitted by electronic means and containing, or to which there is affixed, an
electronic signature.
3.4 Future Amendments. The authority to approve, execute and deliver future amendments
to the Financing Documents entered into by the City in connection with the issuance of the Series 2022B
Note and consents required under the Financing Documents is hereby delegated to the Authorized
Officers, subject to the following conditions: (a) such amendments or consents do not materially
adversely affect the interests of the City; (b) such amendments or consents do not contravene or violate
any policy of the City, (c) such amendments or consents do not require the consent of the holder or such
consent has been obtained; and (d) such amendments or consents are acceptable in form and substance to
the counsel retained by the City to review such amendments. The authorization hereby given shall be
further construed as authorization for the execution and delivery of such certificates and related items as
may be required to demonstrate compliance with the agreements being amended and the terms of this
Resolution. The execution of any instrument by the City Administrator shall be conclusive evidence of
the approval of such instruments in accordance with the terms hereof. In the absence of the City
Administrator, any instrument authorized by this paragraph to be executed and delivered may be executed
by the officer of the City authorized to act in his or her place and stead.
3.5 Interest Rate Swap. The City acknowledges that the Borrower may enter into an interest
rate swap agreement with respect to the Series 2022B Note. The City hereby authorizes any such interest
rate swap agreement with the understanding that the interest rate swap agreement does not affect or alter
the obligations of the Borrower pursuant to the Loan Agreement or the Series 2022B Note and with the
further understanding that neither the City nor any owner of the Series 2022B Note shall have any rights,
duties, or obligations under the interest rate swap agreement.
3.6 Governmental Program. The City by this Resolution has established a governmental
program of acquiring purpose investments for qualified 501(c)(3) organizations. The governmental
program is one in which the following requirements of §1.148-1(b) of the federal regulations relating to
tax-exempt obligations shall be met:
(a) the program involves the origination or acquisition of purpose investments;
(b) at least 95% of the cost of the purpose investments acquired under the program
represents one or more loans to a substantial number of persons representing the general public,
states or political subdivisions, 501(c)(3) organizations, persons who provide housing and related
facilities, or any combination of the foregoing;
(c) at least 95% of the receipts from the purpose investments are used to pay
principal, interest, or redemption prices on issues that financed the program, to pay or reimburse
administrative costs of those issues or of the program, to pay or reimburse anticipated future
losses directly related to the program, to finance additional purpose investments for the same
general purposes of the program, or to redeem and retire governmental obligations at the next
earliest possible date of redemption;
(d) the program documents prohibit any obligor on a purpose investment financed by
the program or any related party to that obligor from purchasing bonds of an issue that finances
the program in an amount related to the amount of the purpose investment acquired from that
obligor; and
9
CR100\24\835859.v2
December 6, 2022
(e) the City shall not waive the right to treat the investment as a program investment.
3.7 Adoption of Housing Program. The preparation of the Housing Program is hereby
ratified, confirmed, and approved in all respects. The Housing Program is hereby adopted, ratified, and
approved. The City Administrator is hereby authorized to do all other things and take all other actions as
may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the Housing Program in accordance with the Act and any
other applicable laws and regulations.
3.8 No Liability of City. No covenant, stipulation, obligation, or agreement herein contained
or contained in the aforementioned documents shall be deemed to be a covenant, stipulation, obligation,
or agreement of any member of the Council, or any officer, agent, or employee of the City in that person’s
individual capacity, and neither the Council, the City nor any officer or employee executing the Series
2022B Note shall be liable personally on the Series 2022B Note or be subject to any personal liability or
accountability by reason of the issuance thereof.
No provision, covenant, or agreement contained in the aforementioned documents, the Series
2022B Note or in any other document relating to the Series 2022B Note, and no obligation therein or
herein imposed upon the City or the breach thereof, shall constitute or give rise to any pecuniary liability
of the City or any charge upon its general credit or taxing powers. In making the agreements, provisions,
covenants, and representations set forth in such documents, the City has not obligated itself to pay or
remit any funds or revenues.
3.9 Costs; Indemnification by Borrower. The Borrower has agreed and it is hereby
determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project
whether or not the Project is carried to completion will be paid by the Borrower, as the case may be. It is
understood and agreed that the Borrower shall indemnify the City against all liabilities, losses, damages,
costs and expenses (including attorney’s fees and expenses incurred by the City) arising with respect to
the Project, the Financing Documents, or the Series 2022B Note, as further provided for and agreed to by
and between the Borrower and the City in the Loan Agreement.
3.10. Payment of City’s Administrative Fee. The Loan Agreement will require the Borrower to
pay the City’s bond administrative fee in the amount of 50 basis points of the original aggregate principal
amount of the Series 2022B Note when the Series 2022B Note is issued.
3.11. Headings; Terms. Paragraph headings in this resolution are for convenience of reference
only and are not a part hereof, and shall not limit or define the meaning of any provision hereof.
Capitalized terms used, but not defined, herein shall have the meanings given them in, or pursuant to, the
Financing Documents. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its approval.
10
CR100\24\835859.v2
December 6, 2022
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota, this 6th day of December, 2022.
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
CR100\24\835859.v2
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Medina, Minnesota
(the “City”), do hereby certify that attached hereto is a compared, true, and correct copy of a resolution
granting approval to the issuance of conduit revenue obligations by the City on behalf of Saint Therese of
Corcoran, LLC, duly adopted by the City Council of the City on December 6, 2022, at a meeting thereof
duly called and held, as on file and of record in my office, which resolution has not been amended,
modified, or rescinded since the date thereof, and is in full force and effect as of the date hereof.
WITNESS My hand this ____ day of December, 2022.
____________________________________________
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
BAPS Page 1 of 8 December 6, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: November 30, 2022
MEETING: December 6, 2022 City Council
SUBJECT: BAPS Minneapolis Medina LLC – 1400 Hamel Rd –
Amended Site Plan Review
Background
On November 16, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-78,
granting Site Plan Review approval for construction of a 46,000 s.f.
religious/assembly use at 1400 Hamel Road. During review of the Site Plan
Review, the City enacted a moratorium and studied regulations related to
rooftop architectural elements. The applicant had originally requested rooftop
elements on their proposed structures, but updated their plans to remove the
elements to abide by the interim regulations within the moratorium. The applicant had intended
to redesign the elements based on the regulations ultimately adopted by the City.
On March 1, 2022, the City adopted updated regulations related to rooftop elements and
rescinded the moratorium. The applicant has now updated their architectural plans consistent
with the updated regulations.
The applicant also proposes minor adjustments to the building footprint and parking lot layout. The
building is proposed to be in essentially the same location, but the main entrance of the building was
proposed to be placed on the south of the building instead of the east. The applicant also proposes to
move the sidewalk into the center of the southern parking lot. It had previously been proposed along
the east side of the parking lot. The improvements generally fall within the same footprint as
previously approved. Staff highlighted the previous location of the sidewalk in red on the first page
of the attached plan set, and outlined the location of the building previously approved with a dashed
green line.
The primary change is related to the proposed architecture, which is described in the first section of
this report. The remaining information is largely unchanged from the previous approval, but staff has
updated our review and summarized for context.
The subject site is approximately 20 acres in size, with approximately half containing wetlands. The
site is guided for Business development and zoned Business Park (BP). An existing home and barn
are located on the site and the upland areas of the site are pasture. An aerial of the subject site and
surrounding lands can be found at the top of the following page.
Property south of Hamel Road is zoned Rural Residential and currently has homes on rural lots. The
AutoMotorPlex facility and a storage building owned by Loram are located to the west. The property
north of the subject site is guided for Business development and currently farmed. A large wetland is
located east of the site, and property to the east is guided Mixed Residential and owned by Wayzata
Schools.
• 46,000 s.f. religious
place of assembly
• 20 acre site
• 10 buildable acres
• Zoned BP
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item #9E
BAPS Page 2 of 8 December 6, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
Architecture - Building Materials and Design
The BP zoning district requires the following architectural standards.
Materials
The BP district requires: “All exterior building materials shall be durable and meet the following
standards:
(a) A minimum of 20 percent of the building exterior shall be brick, natural stone, stucco
(not Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product), copper, or glass.
(b) A maximum of 80 percent may be decorative concrete, split face (rock face) decorative
block, and/or decorative pre-cast concrete panels. Decorative concrete shall be color
impregnated in earth tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a
high quality terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine appearance.
(c) A maximum of 20 percent may be wood, metal (excluding copper) or fiber cement lap
siding or Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product, if used as accent
materials which are integrated into the overall building design.”
BAPS Page 3 of 8 December 6, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
The building is proposed to include the
exterior materials to the right:
Staff recommends a condition that the
concrete is “color impregnated in earth
tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a high quality terrazzo, brick, stucco,
or travertine appearance.”
Modulation
The business districts require: “Buildings shall be designed to avoid long, monotonous building
walls. Modulation may include varying building height, building setback, or building
materials/design. Generally, a particular building elevation shall include a minimum of one
element of modulation per 100 feet of horizontal length, or portion thereof. Alternative
architectural or site elements and designs may also be approved by the city which achieve the
purpose of reducing the visual impact of long building walls.”
The north and south façades are approximately 150 feet in length, requiring 2 aspects of
modulation. The west and east façades are approximately 340 feet in length, requiring 4 aspects
of modulation. The proposed architectural plans appear to exceed these minimum requirements
with horizonal and vertical modulation, plus there is additional material differentiation across the
facades.
Fenestration and Transparency
The business districts require: “Building elevations which face a public street shall include
generous window coverage. Alternative architectural elements may be approved by the city when
windows are not practical.”
The southern façade of the structure includes approximately 40% window coverage along the
first floor elevation. The main assembly space has a taller roof, and the elevation is set back
from the south building face. If you include this higher elevation, windows account for 7% of
the entire façade. However, there are rooftop architectural elements in front of this taller portion
of the structure.
Multi-sided Architecture
The business districts require: “Any rear or side building elevation which faces a public street or
a residential zoning district shall include design and architectural elements of a quality
generally associated with a front façade. The elevation(s) shall be compatible with the front
building elevation.”
The south and east facades face residential zoning districts, although the structure is more than
1000 feet from where any structures could be located. The southern façade is designed as the
“front” elevation and the eastern façade includes windows and the rooftop elements are visible as
well.
Rooftop Elements
The ordinance adopted by the City Council in March includes the following provisions for
rooftop elements:
Materials Proposed Required
Glass, stone, brick, stucco 94% Minimum 20%
Concrete 1% Maximum 80%
Metal 5% Maximum 20%
BAPS Page 4 of 8 December 6, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
“No rooftop architectural element, as described in Subd. 1(a), shall extend above the greater of
the following:
(i) ten feet above the highest point of the roof on which it is located;
(ii) a horizontal line five feet greater than the maximum building height allowed in
the respective zoning district in which it is located, as measured from the average grade
around the building; or
(iii) in non-residential districts, a vertical distance of 50 feet as measured from the average
grade around the building to the top of the architectural element”
The applicant proposes 5’ and 6’ parapets around most of the structure, which provides screening
for rooftop equipment. These parapets are consistent with the standards.
The applicant also proposes spire features on the southern portion of the building, topped with
flags. The top of the flag is proposed 50 feet above grade, consistent with clause (iii).
Proposed Use
Religious institutions are a permitted use within the BP zoning district. During previous review, the
City received public comment related to the tax-exempt status of such uses. Federal law provides
that cities may not treat religious uses any less favorably than comparable non-religious uses
irrespective of tax-exempt status and it is not relevant for the sake of land use review.
Site Layout
The proposed construction appears to meet the dimensional standards of the BP zoning district.
Following is a summary comparing the proposed construction to standards of the district:
BP District
Requirement
Proposed
Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 feet
Minimum Rear/Side Yard Setback 30 feet 30 feet (west)
Setback from Residential 100 feet 410 feet (east)
1000 feet (south)
Minimum Parking Setbacks
Front Yard 35 feet 560 feet
Rear and Side Yard 20 feet 20 feet (north)
20 feet (west)
Residential (east) 100 feet 310 (east)
630 (south)
Maximum Hardcover 70% 19%
Building Height (sprinkled) 35 feet 34 feet
Stormwater/Grading
The applicant proposes three filtration basins for stormwater management. The City Engineer
has reviewed and provided comments to address upon final plans. The application has been
conditionally approved by Elm Creek Watershed as well.
BAPS Page 5 of 8 December 6, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
The site slopes generally from the northwest to the wetland to the east. The applicant proposes
to flatten the area of the building and parking and add a retaining wall along the east side of the
driveway. However, the drainage patterns of the site mimic existing by having three filtration
basins along the east of the site.
Wetlands and Floodplains
A large wetland occupies the east of the property,
and a smaller wetland is in the southwest of the
site, with a narrow strip of land between the two wetlands. The applicant proposes 846 square
feet of impacts to the wetlands to allow access between the two wetlands to the north of the site.
The wetland requires buffers with a minimum average width to the right. The wetland protection
ordinance allows reductions in buffer width to 75% of the minimum width if an applicant
implements practices which are superior to strict adherence. The applicant proposes an
approximately 100 foot long portion of the buffer to the east of the building at 15’ in width (75%
of the minimum). The applicant proposes to exceed the total area of required buffer throughout
the site to provide the superior protection as required. Staff recommends that a minimum of 2x
area of larger buffer is provided for the reduced area (approximately an additional 500 square
feet).
FEMA floodplain maps identify a large “Zone A” floodplain within the large wetland basin to
the east. No impacts are proposed near the floodplain area, and all improvements are proposed
more than 10 feet above the elevation of the wetland.
Transportation
Peak traffic is projected on Sunday mornings for services. Traffic for remaining days will be
fairly limited. The application was routed to Hennepin County Transportation for review since
Hamel Road is a County Road. Hennepin County and the City’s Transportation Engineer have
reviewed and determined that projected traffic would not necessitate improvements or turn lanes
on Hamel Road. Hamel Road is comparatively low volume roadway and the peak traffic and
turns generated by the use occur off peak.
Staff recommends a condition that the applicant provide traffic control if requested by the City
for larger events.
The access to Hamel Road is proposed across from the shared driveway of 1405/1495 Hamel
Road.
The applicant proposes a sidewalk connection from Hamel Road to the building. The City has
identified a future trail along Hamel Road and the City Council approved of the route for the
Diamond Lake Regional Trail in this location as well. The applicant has indicated that they
would amend their grading plan to make future construction of the trail as easy as possible. Staff
has inquired if the applicant would be willing to provide trail easements.
Wetland Mange.
Class.
Average
Buffer
Minimum
Buffer
East Manage 1 30 feet 20 feet
West Mange 2 25 feet 20 feet
BAPS Page 6 of 8 December 6, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
Parking
The applicant proposes 211 parking spaces. The applicant has proposed 227 spaces on the
previously approved plan. For religious institutions and other places of assembly, the City’s
parking ordinance requires 1 space per 4 seats. This would be equivalent to 844 seats. The main
assembly place has less seating than this, but if all spaces such as classrooms and dining are
calculated, seating capacity would exceed 844. The applicant has indicated that these other
spaces are ancillary, and most will not be used to their maximum concurrently. Historically, the
peak attendance has been 250 persons, which only occurs a few times per year.
There is additional area in the southern portion of the site for additional parking if necessary.
Staff believes it is reasonable to not require excessive parking to be constructed. Staff
recommends a condition that states no improvements can be constructed in this area unless the
City determines that existing parking is sufficient.
Lighting
The City’s lighting ordinance requires light trespass to be no more than 0.2 FC at property lines
post curfew. The lighting plans appear to exceed these amounts in some locations. Staff
recommends a condition that the lighting plans be updated to comply, and staff believes the
lighting plan can be updated to comply without much issue.
Tree Preservation
No wooded areas are located on the property, although there are historically planted tree lines in
the vicinity of the house, and volunteer trees (predominantly box elder) in the area of the barn.
Trees in the remaining site are sparse. The total number of significant trees is approximately
100.
The applicant proposes to remove 8 trees for construction of access and the parking lot. The
applicant also proposes to remove 21 trees adjacent to the house and barn to allow demolition of
the existing structures.
The tree preservation ordinance would permit 10% of the trees on the site to be removed without
replacement for initial site development and 10% in connection with “other activities” on the site
beyond initial development.
If full replacement were to be required, approximately 80 inches of replacement trees would be
required. The tree preservation ordinance exempts the removal of “pioneering Tree species such
as box elder when needed to manage other ecosystems and where removal will not cause erosion
or damage to riparian areas.” Staff believes it is reasonable to not require the replacement in this
case.
BAPS Page 7 of 8 December 6, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
Landscaping
The business district includes the following landscape requirements:
• Building Setting - At least 12 feet of landscaped area shall be provided adjacent to all
buildings except for walks, plaza space and approved loading docks. Walks within this
landscaped area shall be limited to where practically necessary to serve access points of
buildings
Landscaping appears to be 12 feet or greater in width, except in the area east of the building in
the loading/unloading area. Staff believes it is reasonable to have reduced landscape area in this
location as “access points/plaza.”
• Minimum Planting
Requirement Required Proposed
Overstory trees 1 per 50’ site perimeter 82 trees 82 trees
Ornamental trees 1 per 100’ site perimeter 41 trees 41 trees
Shrubs 1 per 30’ site perimeter 137 shrubs 276 shrubs
Staff recommends that additional landscaping be provided west of the proposed building.
• Parking lot landscaping – minimum of 8% of parking lot area
Staff has estimated approximately 8% of the parking lot to be landscaping, but recommends
a condition that the applicant provide information necessary to verify.
• Landscaping islands every 20 spaces, wider separations for cells of 120 spaces
Plans appear to provide required landscaping islands and separation.
• Buffering. Landscaping is required to have an opacity of 50% adjacent to residential
zoning districts. According to the City’s bufferyard requirements, this would require
approximately 2400 “planting points” to the south and east of the structure. South of the
structure meets this requirement. The number or shrubs will need to be verified to the
east of the building to determine compliance.
Utilities, Mechanical Equipment, and Trash and Recycling Facilities
The business districts require: All utilities shall be placed underground. To the extent possible,
all utility equipment, meters and transformers shall be placed either inside of the building or
within an outside mechanical court formed by walls. If not located within the building, these
items shall be fully screened from view from adjacent property and streets through the
use of opaque landscaping or walls constructed of materials which are compatible with
the building.
The plans do not identify transformers, generators, or HVAC location. Staff recommends a
condition that these locations be identified and screening measures provided.
All trash and material to be recycled are required to be stored within the principal building,
within an accessory structure, or within an enclosed outdoor area adjacent to the principal
structure. The applicant proposes an accessory structure in the southwestern corner of the
northern parking lot for this purpose.
BAPS Page 8 of 8 December 6, 2022
Amended Site Plan Review City Council Meeting
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission reviewed the amended Site Plan Review at the November 9 meeting.
Commissioners indicated that the proposed adjustments appeared to be consistent with City
regulations. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the amendment.
The City has a relatively low level of discretion when reviewing the Site Plan Review. The
purpose of a Site Plan Review is to review compliance with relevant land use regulations. If the
proposed construction meets the requirements, it should be approved. The City can apply
conditions as necessary to ensure compliance with City requirements and to protect the public
health, safety and welfare.
It is also important to note that the existing Site Plan Review would still be in effect. The
primary amendment is the proposed architecture of the building. The adjustments to the site
layout are relatively minor.
Subject to the conditions noted in the attached resolution, staff believes the plans would meet
relevant requirements and staff recommends approval.
Potential Action
If the City Council finds that, subject the conditions, the proposed construction meets relevant
standards, the following action would be appropriate:
Motion to adopt the resolution granting amended site plan review approval to BAP
Minneapolis Medina LLC
Attachments
1. DRAFT Resolution granting amended site plan review approval
2. Resolution 2021-78
3. Excerpt from 11/9/2022 Planning Commission minutes
4. Engineering comments dated 8/26/2021
5. Site and Civil Plans (note: Grading and Utility plan were from previously approved plan
for reference; Have not been updated with new layout)
6. Architectural Plans
Resolution No. 2022-##
DATE
Member __________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-##
RESOLUTION GRANTING AMENDED SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL
TO BAPS MINNEAPOLIS MEDINA LLC AT 1400 HAMEL ROAD
WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, organized and
existing under the laws of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, BAPS Minneapolis Medina LLC (the “Applicant”) is the fee owner of
property located at 1400 Hamel Road (the “Property”), which is legally described in Exhibit A,
attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, on November 16, 2021, the Medina City Council adopted Resolution 2021-
78, granting site plan review approval to the Applicant for construction of a building with an area
of approximately 46,000 square feet and ancillary site improvements for a religious/assembly use,
subject to certain terms and conditions; and
WHEREAS, although the proposed size and use of the structure remains the same, the
Applicant has proposed amendments to the proposed architectural design and site plan from that
approved through Resolution 2021-78; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the amended site plan on November 9,
2022, reviewed the information provided by the Applicant and City staff, heard testimony from
interested parties, and recommended approval of the site plan review; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed site plan, considered the Planning
Commission recommendation, and heard additional testimony on December 6, 2022; and
WHEREAS, subject to the fulfillment of the conditions noted below, the City Council has
determined that the proposed construction is consistent with applicable City requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota
hereby grants amended site plan review approval, subject to the following terms and conditions:
1) The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall be in a
form and of substance required by the City Attorney and shall include the conditions
described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy.
2) All improvements installed shall be consistent with the architectural and landscaping
plans dated 10/14/2022, and civil plans dated 9/29/2021 except as may be modified
herein. The civil plans shall be updated to correspond to the updated site layout and shall
be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to commencing
construction.
Resolution No. 2022-## 2
DATE
3) The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the site
improvements in order to ensure completion.
4) The Applicant shall grant drainage and utility easements over all utilities, stormwater
improvements, wetlands, drainageways and locations recommended by the City
Engineer.
5) The Applicant shall execute a stormwater maintenance agreement that meets all
requirements of the City to satisfy the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed
Management Commission and ensure the long-term maintenance of all on-site
stormwater elements.
6) The Applicant shall abide by the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance,
including installation of vegetative buffers, recordation of easements, and installation of
signage. Plans shall be updated to provide additional buffer area to provide for superior
protection to account for the reduced buffer width to the east of the building.
7) The Applicant shall submit specifications confirming that proposed concrete panels are
color impregnated in earth tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a
high quality terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine appearance.
8) Lighting shall comply with the City’s lighting ordinance, limiting light trespass to 0.2 FC
after light ordinance curfew and requiring all lighting to be downcast.
9) The Applicant shall submit information to verify that landscaping occupies at least 8% of
the parking lot area.
10) Wetland impacts shall be limited to those identified in the Wetland Conservation Act
Exemption approved on September 20, 2021.
11) The number of flags displayed on the property shall abide by the City’s sign ordinance
and height shall adhere to relevant requirements of City ordinances.
12) Plans shall be updated to provide grading for future trail along Hamel Road.
13) The Applicant shall identify transformer, generator, HVAC locations and provide
screening measures for review and approval.
14) The Applicant shall provide traffic control as requested by the City for larger events.
15) All comments from the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission shall be
addressed.
16) All comments from the City Engineer shall be addressed.
17) All comments from the Fire Chief shall be addressed.
18) The site plan review approval shall be effective for one year and thereafter shall be
considered null and void. Notwithstanding the foregoing timeline, construction of the
4500 s.f. and 1000 s.f. expansions shown on the architectural plans shall not require Site
Plan Review approval if constructed within five years of the date of this resolution, but
shall be subject to administrative approval by City staff for compliance with the
conditions contained herein.
19) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for
the cost of reviewing the site plan review and reviewing and preparing related documents.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Resolution 2021-78 is hereby rescinded and no
longer of force and effect, because the approval has been amended as described above and all
terms and conditions associated with such approval have been incorporated herein.
Resolution No. 2022-## 3
DATE
Dated:
By: ________________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
By: _________________________________________
Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator-Deputy Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
__________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2022-## 4
DATE
Exhibit A
Legal Description of the Property
Resolution No. 2021-78
November 16, 2021
Member _Reid____ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-78
RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN REVIEW
TO BAPS MINNEAPOLIS LLC AT 1400 HAMEL ROAD
WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, organized and
existing under the laws of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Leslie Borg is the fee owner of property located at 1400 Hamel Road (the
“Property”), which is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, BAPS Minneapolis LLC (the “Applicant”) intends to purchase the Property
to construct a building with an area of approximately 46,000 square feet building and ancillary site
improvements for a religious/assembly use; and
WHEREAS, City regulations require approval of a Site Plan Review for such
construction; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested approval of a Site Plan pursuant to City
regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Site Plan on September 14, 2021,
reviewed the information provided by the Applicant and City staff, heard testimony from interested
parties, and recommended approval of the site plan review; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed site plan, considered the Planning
Commission recommendation, and heard additional testimony on October 5, 2021, October 19,
2021 and November 3, 2021; and
WHEREAS, subject to the fulfillment of the conditions noted below, the City Council has
determined that the proposed construction is consistent with applicable City requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota
hereby grants approval of the proposed Site Plan Review and the Conditional Use Permit, subject
to the following terms and conditions:
1) The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall be in a
form and of substance required by the City Attorney and shall include the conditions
described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy.
2) All improvements installed shall be consistent with the architectural plans dated 10/27/2021,
landscaping plans dated 10/11/2021, and civil plans dated 9/29/2021 except as may be
Resolution No. 2021-78 2
November 16, 2021
modified herein. The design of all improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer prior to commencing construction.
3) The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the site improvements
in order to ensure completion.
4) The Applicant shall grant drainage and utility easements over all utilities, stormwater
improvements, wetlands, drainageways and locations recommended by the City Engineer.
5) The Applicant shall execute a stormwater maintenance agreement that meets all requirements
of the City to satisfy the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed Management
Commission and ensure the long-term maintenance of all on-site stormwater elements.
6) The Applicant shall abide by the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance, including
installation of vegetative buffers, recordation of easements, and installation of signage. Plans
shall be updated to provide additional buffer area to provide for superior protection to
account for the reduced buffer width to the east of the building.
7) The Applicant shall submit specifications confirming that proposed concrete panels are color
impregnated in earth tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a high quality
terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine appearance.
8) Lighting shall comply with the City’s lighting ordinance, limiting light trespass to 0.2 FC
after light ordinance curfew and requiring all lighting to be downcast.
9) Wetland impacts shall be limited to those identified in the Wetland Conservation Act
Exemption approved on September 20, 2021.
10) The number of flags displayed on the property shall abide by the City’s sign ordinance and
height shall adhere to relevant requirements of City ordinances.
11) Plans shall be updated to provide grading for future trail along Hamel Road.
12) The Applicant shall identify transformer, generator, HVAC locations and provide screening
measures for review and approval.
13) The Applicant shall provide traffic control as requested by the City for larger events.
14) All comments from the Elm Creek Watershed District shall be addressed.
15) All comments from the City Engineer shall be addressed.
16) All comments from the Fire Chief shall be addressed.
17) The site plan review approval shall be effective for one year and thereafter shall be
considered null and void.
18) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the
cost of reviewing the site plan review and reviewing and preparing related documents.
Dated: November 16, 2021
By: ________________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
By: _________________________________________
Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator-Deputy Clerk
Resolution No. 2021-78 3
November 16, 2021
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
___Cavanaugh__ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
DesLauriers, Albers, Cavanaugh, Reid, Martin
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2021-78 4
November 16, 2021
Exhibit A
Legal Description of the Property
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 11/9/2022 Minutes
1
BAPS Minneapolis Medina – 1400 Hamel Road – Amended Site Plan Review for Construction of
Religious/Assembly Building (PID 1111823230003)
Finke stated that this would be an amendment to the site plan review which was approved about one
year ago. He stated that during review of the site plan review last year, the City adopted a
moratorium related to rooftop elements. He stated that the rooftop elements were not included in the
original review in order to move forward with utilities and grading and intended to come back after
the City Council adopted regulations related to rooftop elements. He highlighted some minor site
plan changes including a change to the sidewalk location and reorientation for the building to the
south. He noted that the initial construction would be for the first building, with approval for the
future buildings if constructed in the next five years. He displayed the proposed architecture with the
rooftop elements noting that the rooftop elements would meet the required height limitations and
therefore staff recommends approval.
Rhem invited the applicant to speak.
Asit Waghani, representing the applicant, stated that they had revised their building plans from what
was originally submitted, since the City amended the building height requirements. Site layout
changes were also made, as noted by Finke.
Popp commented that the applicant has done a great job meeting the conditions and requirements
specified.
Rhem commented that the plan is well thought out to minimize visual impacts to neighbors.
Motion by Nielsen, seconded by Jacob, to recommend approval of the amended site plan review
with the conditions noted in the staff report. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Grajczyk)
K:\018775-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-20 Submittal\_2021-08-26 BAPS Temple Concept Plan - WSB Comments.docx
70
1
X
E
N
I
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
|
SU
I
T
E
3
0
0
| M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
,
M
N
|
55
4
1
6
|
76
3
.
5
4
1
.
4
8
0
0
|
W
S
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
August 26, 2021
Mr. Dusty Finke
City Planning Director
City of Medina
2052 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55340-9790
Re: BAPS Hindu Temple Site Plan Review – Engineering Plan Review
City Project No. LR-21-300
WSB Project No. 018775-000
Dear Mr. Finke:
WSB staff have reviewed the BAPS Hindu Temple site plan submittal dated August 19, 2021.
The plans propose to construct one building and 250 total parking spaces spread out between
two parking areas. The proposed project will generate approximately 3.81 acres of new
impervious on the existing 20-acre site located at 1400 Hamel Road.
The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina’s general
engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with
regards to engineering and stormwater management matters.
General
1. Comments on the landscaping plans will be provided under separate cover by City Staff.
2. The City Fire Marshall will provide pertinent comments under separate cover.
3. Provide an easement for a future regional trail along Hamel Road; see additional
comments from City Planner.
4. Any work within Hennepin County right of way will require a permit, add a note to the plan
to this affect. The applicant shall also meet the requirements of the County’s plat review
committee.
Existing Conditions & Demolition Plans (C2.0,1 C2.02)
5. Note existing FES invert to the northeast of the site.
6. Impact to the adjacent site is proposed for a watermain looping connection. Show the
infrastructure removals/impacts with this work.
7. Show any proposed removals/impacts to Hamel Road.
Site Plan (C3.01)
8. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building
structures and required turn around space as required by the Fire Marshall.
9. Note dimension of proposed sidewalk. Add a 5’ boulevard between the back of curb and
sidewalk along the southerly access driveway.
City of Medina – BAPS Hindu Temple Plan Review – Engineering Review
August 26, 2021
Page 2
K:\018775-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-20 Submittal\_2021-08-26 BAPS Temple Concept Plan - WSB Comments.docx
Grading Plan & Notes (C4.01, C4.02)
10. Retaining walls greater than 4’ in height will required certified engineering drawings/plans
form a registered structural engineer. A safety fence/guardrail will be required at the top
of the wall. Provide soil borings/geotechnical analysis for the area where the wall is
proposed.
11. There appears to be a low point in the parking lot near the southeast corner of the
building where collection/conveyance is not being provided. Review and update plans
accordingly.
12. Confirm inlet capacity for catch basins at the low point for the south entrance driveway.
13. Label more of the proposed contours near the northerly and westerly property lines.
14. Maintain all surface grades within the minimum of 2% and maximum 33% slopes.
Vegetated swale grades shall also be a minimum of 2.0%.
15. Locations where an EOF, Rain Guardian, or other concentrated discharge points over
vegetated areas will require a permanent stabilization method such as rip-rap or
permanent turf reinforcement matting.
16. At EOF locations for all basins, show the grading/contours in those areas to facilitate the
overflow conveyance.
17. Incorporate/accommodate EOF locations located along the westerly property line from
the AutoMotorPlex site.
Erosion Control & SWPPP Plans (C5.01. C5.02, C5.03)
18. An NPDES permit will need to be obtained for this project and SWPPP must be
developed in accordance with the MN Construction Stormwater Permit.
19. Provide redundant perimeter control around the wetland areas. Silt fence should be
double layered to a 3 foot minimum separation and 5 foot maximum separation.
20. Erosion control blanket is required for slopes 4:1 or greater.
21. A full review of erosion/sediment control will be conducted with the final plat submittal.
Show hatching on plan where this will be required.
Utility Plan (C6.01)
22. Based on the current design, it appears the applicant will be required to apply for a permit
from DLI, provide copies to the City.
23. Hydrant locations shall be reviewed and approved of by the City Fire Marshal; typically, a
maximum of 250’ influence radius (approximately 500’ spacing) is required around
building (hose length).
24. The watermain connections to the building shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Fire Marshall. Show the location of the PIV on the plan.
25. On the final construction plans add the following notes:
o The City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred associated with
variations in the utility asbuilt plans, elevations, or locations.
o Watermain shall have a minimum of 7.5’ of cover.
City of Medina – BAPS Hindu Temple Plan Review – Engineering Review
August 26, 2021
Page 3
K:\018775-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-20 Submittal\_2021-08-26 BAPS Temple Concept Plan - WSB Comments.docx
o The City will require televising for sanitary sewer pipe installations prior to
accepting a warranty for the utility systems; provide report and video files to the
City for review.
26. Any public sanitary sewer and watermain shall be encompassed by drainage and utility
easements where located outside of public road right of way. Drainage and utility
easements will need to allow for a 1:1 trench from the invert of the utility with a minimum
of 20’ centered on the utility.
27. Consideration of future watermain looping needs and stubs for future phases or other
adjacent developments will be required.
o The watermain looping connection proposed parallel to the westerly property line
will not likely provide a significant increase in fire flow or capacity for the system.
Instead, consider eliminating this mainline and extend the hydrant at the
southerly building location directly into the existing main within the AutoMotorPlex
site to the west. Further south, maintain the proposed connection within the
AutoMotorPlex site shown on the plans but extend easterly/southerly across the
wetland to allow for a future connection with potential development of the
southerly parcel and/or a future extension/connection to Hamel Road.
o With any connection into the adjacent property; provide documentation that the
site owner (AutoMotorPlex) has approved access and disturbance to their site for
this connection.
28. The City requires that domestic and fire services are separate taps from the main. line is
extended from the exterior mainline and a curb stop installed. A separate curb stop is
required for the domestic service and gate valve (PIV) for the fire line.
29. Where proposed watermian is being connected at the existing main, a valve will be
required. At the end of the watermain extension to the northeast, add a temporary
hydrant to the end for flushing.
30. Provide dimension notes from watermain to parallel sewer mains (storm and sanitary
sewer); the minimum horizontal separate between mains is 10 feet. Where watermain
crosses any storm sewer or sanitary sewer, add a note at each location to the effect of
“Maintain 18-inch Separation, 4” Rigid Insulation”. If offsets are required where conflicts
with normal watermain pipe placement occur, add appropriate details to the plans.
31. The sewer is shown to angle into the site for the proposed connection to the building. The
City will require that the sewer is extended further east; set MH 01 so that it will be
perpendicular to the connection into the building. The grade along the northerly property
line shall be kept at minimum grade.
32. The existing sanitary manhole will need a new infi-shield installed, note as such on the
plan. Add an note for all sewer manholes to add a “flex seal” or approved equal as a
sealant to the interior chimney section.
33. The City does not allow service lines to be connected directly into manholes; connect the
4” service line to the proposed mainline along the northerly property line.
34. Label the pipe material/strength designation for sewer mains (i.e. SDR 35, SDR 26, etc.)
and class of RCP for storm sewer.
35. Within filtration areas, extend cleanouts to the base of the slope, note rim/invert
elevations.
36. Add rip-rap quantities and class notes at each flared end section and pond overflows (if
applicable).
City of Medina – BAPS Hindu Temple Plan Review – Engineering Review
August 26, 2021
Page 4
K:\018775-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-20 Submittal\_2021-08-26 BAPS Temple Concept Plan - WSB Comments.docx
37. On the final plans, note the sizes of the proposed storm sewer structures.
Construction Details Plans (C9.01, C9.02, C9.03)
38. Utilize City of Medina standard details where applicable.
39. The pavement design/typical section shall be designed to meet the City’s standard, at
minimum. The final pavement section shall be designed by a registered geotechnical
engineer for the specific soil conditions found on the site and may need to include a
thicker aggregate section and/or a sand section.
The pavement section for the primary fire truck access route shall meet a 9-ton design.
40. A full review of standard details will be conducted with the final plat submittal.
Traffic & Access
41. A review of the traffic and access implications with the proposed improvements will be
provided with future submittals.
Stormwater
42. The development will need to meet the appropriate watershed standards for Elm Creek
Water Management Commission and the applicant shall submit for the required permits
and provide copies to the City when approved.
43. The developer will need to submit a Stormwater Management Plan and modeling
consistent with City’s Stormwater Design Manual.
44. The development will need to meet the City’s volume control requirement to capture and
retain onsite 1.1” of runoff from the net new impervious surface. By satisfying the volume
requirement the water quality requirement is considered met. Follow the City’s
Stormwater Design Manual for alternative credits towards the volume requirement if
infiltration is not feasible.
o Refer to Medina’s Stormwater Design Manual for alternatives to infiltration and
the credit given to each practice.
Filtration is credited at 50%
Currently plans are showing filtration of 25,795 cf. At 50% credit for
filtration 30,438 cf will be required to be treated in the basins to meet
requirements.
45. Provide unobstructed maintenance access to all ponding facilities.
46. Refer to the City’s construction detail RG-02 for filtration basins with drain tile.
47. Clearly label on the plans and include in the legend all locations that the proposed Rain
Guardian Foxhole will be installed. Provide information on Operation and Maintenance
specifications for future maintenance.
48. Provide information on the size, type, and slope of the proposed drain tile under the
basins.
49. With final design, provide storm sewer calculations using the rational method, sizing
storm sewer for the 10-yr 24-hr Atlas 14 rainfall. Provide drainage area map for storm
sewer sizing and calculations
City of Medina – BAPS Hindu Temple Plan Review – Engineering Review
August 26, 2021
Page 5
K:\018775-000\Admin\Docs\2021-08-20 Submittal\_2021-08-26 BAPS Temple Concept Plan - WSB Comments.docx
50. Provide pretreatment for the direct storm sewer outfalls to the NURP/filtration basins in
the form of 4 foot sumps per City standards
51. Maintain all surface grades within the minimum of 2% and maximum 33% slopes.
Vegetated swale grades shall be 2.0% or more. If steeper slopes are being proposed
along filtration basins provide information for stabilization methods to prevent erosion and
ensure stabilization of soils.
Wetlands
52. The concept plan shows a roadway crossing between Wetland 1 and Wetland 2. Final
design should incorporate a culvert connection to maintain hydrology between these two
wetlands. Complete.
53. The project proposes 722 sf of impact for the driveway crossing. The applicant has
submitted a WCA application to the city and it is currently under review. The project may
also require a Section 404 permit from US Army Corps of Engineers.
54. Upland buffers and buffer setbacks will be required for the project. Wetland 1 is classified
as a Manage 1 based on the City’s functional classification of wetlands and requires an
average 30-foot buffer (minimum 20 feet). The planned buffer shown is an average of 25
feet and minimum of 10 feet, which does not meet the City’s ordinance.
Wetland 2 is classified as a Manage 2 and requires a 25-foot average buffer (minimum
20-feet). The planned average buffer shown meets the City’s ordinance. The minimum
buffer (10 feet) does not meet the ordinance.
The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted
plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or
modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards.
We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if
you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet.
Sincerely,
WSB
Jim Stremel, P.E.
City Engineer
Traffic & Access
1. Hennepin County has jurisdiction for review and approval of access to Hamel Road. The
applicant has indicated that they have met with the County and after review by the County a
Traffic Study will not be required and no turn lanes would be required on Hamel Road at this time
with the proposed improvements.
2. Review of the anticipated traffic generation from the proposed improvement found that based on
ITE rates for a church with 480 seats the site would generate, 211 average weekday trips, 10
average weekday AM Peak trips, 20 average weekday PM peak trips and 260 peak Sunday trips.
The site is proposed to have 250 parking spaces which is adequate for the anticipated peak
Sunday traffic generation.
3. The guiding warrant for a 40 MPH roadway with 1,500 ADT has a threshold for right and left turns
of 20 vph and 25 vph respectively. Assuming an ADT on Hamel Road of 1150 vpd, the calculated
peak hour right and left turns from Hamel are 11 vph and left turns 9 vph respectively. The
proposed church use would not trigger the need for turn lanes on Hamel Road.
Further review with a fully developed site that includes the remaining lots to the south as a
business use would exceed the guiding warrants and turn lanes on Hamel Road highly
recommended.
4. Should traffic safety or operations at the site driveway become an issue during peak events, the
BAPS Temple will be responsible for providing temporary traffic control during the events.
50
'
B
L
D
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
35
'
P
R
K
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
F
B
B
B
J A
AA
A
L
M
N
N
N
N
NN
N
RELOCATE EXISTING SIGN
O
17
2
.
3
'
157.7'
A
TYP
O
24'
9'
TYP
9'
TY
P
30
'
195.8'
20'
TO BC
F
F
F
TYP
I
EAST WETLAND
MANAGE 2
WEST WETLAND
MANAGE 1
HA
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 40,345 SF
FFE=1000.00
2F - EAST POND
HWL100: 995.68
WQE : 994.50
BOT: 993.00
10
'
T
R
A
I
L
A
N
D
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
'
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20' D&U EASEMENT
3F - WEST POND
HWL100: 996.75
WQE: 996.50
BOT: 995.00
1F - NORTH POND
HWL100: 996.48
WQE: 994.50
BOT: 993.00
NO PARKING
NO PARKING
NO PARKING NO PARKING
EVEVEVEV EV
22
'
6'
12
'
5.7
'
15
.
7
'
21.6'
10'
6'5'
SAWCUT BITUMINOUS
MEET & MATCH
EXISTING PAVEMENT
3' CURB
TRANSITION
19.8'
66
.
7
'
80
'
25 30 14
11
Q
O
R
30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER
WETLAND EDGE
20' MINIMUM WETLAND BUFFER
30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER
WETLAND EDGE
20' MINIMUM WETLAND BUFFER
PROPOSED AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER
(SEE WETLAND SUMMARY TABLE THIS SHEET)
WETLAND IMPACT AREA 700 SF
PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER
25' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER
WETLAND EDGE
20' MINIMUM WETLAND BUFFER
EXTENTS OF 15' ALTERNATE
MINIMUM BUFFER
PROPOSED AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER
(SEE WETLAND SUMMARY TABLE THIS SHEET)
20' PARKING SETBACK
30' BUILDING SETBACK
14 26
19
8
9
13
13
11
126
9
30' BUILDING SETBACK
20' BUILDING SETBACK
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
24
'
N
19
'
24
'
19
'
19
'
24
'
19
'
B
J19'24'19'19'24'19'
I
19
'
30
'
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
20
'
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
OHWL 988.8
OHWL 988.8
WETLAND IMPACT AREA 110 SF
24'6.7
'
24
'
12
'
3.7
'
12
'
A
22
'
3
F
F
B E E
I
B
SCALE IN FEET
0 12060
NORTH
Oct 13, 2022 - 4:35pm - User:kstewart L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-C3-SITE.dwg
C3.01
SITE PLAN
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,
Minnetonka, MN office.
10/13/202258645
Joseph Bailey
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
1.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.
2.ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT “GUTTER OUT” WHERE WATER
DRAINS AWAY FROM CURB. ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS “GUTTER IN” CURB.
COORDINATE WITH GRADING CONTRACTOR.
4.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.
5.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
6.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF
EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE
LOCATIONS.
7.SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PYLON SIGN DETAILS
8.LIGHT STANDARD LOCATIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SITE LIGHTING PLAN IS DESIGN BUILD BY
CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM LIGHT STANDARD LOCATION WITH LIGHTING VENDOR.
OR SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION DETAIL AND FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF
LIGHT POLE.
9.REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, LOT NUMBERS, LOT AREAS, AND LOT DIMENSIONS.
10.ALL GRADIENTS ON SIDEWALKS ALONG THE ADA ROUTE HAVE BEEN DESIGNED WITH A MAXIMUM
LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 4.5%, AND A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 1.5%. THIS IS LESS THAN THE ADA
CODE MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 5% (1:20), EXCEPT AT CURB RAMPS (1:12), AND A MAXIMUM
CROSS SLOPE OF 2.00% (1:50). THE MAXIMUM DESIGN SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN ADA PARKING
STALL OR ACCESS AISLE IS 1.5%, LESS THAN THE ADA CODE MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN
ADA PARKING STALL OR ACCESS AISLE OF 2.00% (1:50). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY
THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD ALONG THE ADA ROUTES PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS
PAVEMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY
BETWEEN THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD VERSUS THE DESIGN GRADIENT AND COORDINATE WITH
GRADING CONTRACTOR.
11."NO PARKING" SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ALONG ALL DRIVEWAYS AS REQUIRED BY CITY.
12.STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY.
13.ANY WORK WITHIN HENNEPIN COUNTY REQUIRES A HENNEPIN COUNTY PERMIT. CONTRACTOR SHALL
OBTAIN APPLICABLE COUNTY PERMITS AND DOCUMENT RECEIPT TO CITY OF MEDINA.
CIVIL 3D MODEL LIMITATIONS
SAMBATEK'S DELIVERABLE AND GOVERNING DOCUMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE A HARD COPY
AND/OR PDF PLAN SHEETS. IF A CIVIL 3D MODEL IS GENERATED IN THE PROCESS OF PREPARING THE PLAN
SHEETS, IT IS AS A DESIGN TOOL ONLY AND NOT AS A SEPARATE DELIVERABLE. AT THE OWNER'S REQUEST,
WE WILL RELEASE OUR CIVIL 3D MODEL FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S USE. HOWEVER, ITS USE IS AT THE
CONTRACTOR'S RISK AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR STAKING OF CURB, SIDEWALK, OR OTHER HARD SURFACE
IMPROVEMENTS. IF A CIVIL 3D MODEL FOR STAKING HARD SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS IS REQUIRED, WE CAN
PROVIDE A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR REFINEMENT AND PREPARATION OF THE CIVIL 3D MODEL.
LEGEND
EASEMENT
CURB & GUTTER
BUILDING
RETAINING WALL
SAWCUT LINE
NUMBER OF PARKING
STALLS PER ROW
SIGN
PIPE BOLLARD
STANDARD DUTY
ASPHALT PAVING
HEAVY DUTY
ASPHALT PAVING
CONCRETE PAVING
PROPERTY LIMIT
EXISTINGPROPOSED
KEY NOTE
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
DEVELOPMENT NOTES KEY NOTES
WETLAND LIMITS
TREELINE
A.BUILDING, STOOPS, STAIRS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS)
B.B-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
C.NOT USED
D.CONCRETE APRON
E.FLAT CURB SECTION
F.CONCRETE SIDEWALK
G.SEGMENTAL BLOCK RETAINING WALL
H.ACCESSIBLE RAMP
I.ACCESSIBLE STALL STRIPING
J.ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN
K.TRANSFORMER
L.TRASH PAD AND 3-SIDED ENCLOSURE
M.PLAYGROUND
N.WETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT SIGN (EVERY 200')
O.FOXHOLE RAIN GUARDIAN
P.CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER (SEE DETAIL 05, SHEET C9.02)
Q.NOT USED
R.RAIN GUARDIAN BUNKER
XX
XX
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED
ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING
SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE
CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY
HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE,
INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
AREA
GROSS SITE AREA
IMPERVIOUS AREA ALLOWED
IMPERVIOUS AREA PROPOSED
BUILDING SETBACKS
FRONT YARD
REAR YARD
SIDE YARD
PARKING SETBACKS
FRONT YARD
REAR YARD
SIDE YARD
ZONING
EXISTING ZONING
PROPOSED ZONING
PARKING SUMMARY
STANDARD PARKING PROVIDED
ADA PARKING REQUIRED
ADA PARKING PROVIDED
ELECTRICAL VEHICLE PARKING PROVIDED
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED (NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS/4= REQUIRED STALLS)
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED
856,427 SF 19.62 AC (100)
599,499 SF 13.76 AC (70%)
160,993 SF 3.69 AC (19%)
50 FEET
30 FEET
30 FEET
50 FEET
20 FEET
20 FEET
BP - BUSINESS PARK
BP - BUSINESS PARK
198 STALLS
7 STALLS
8 STALLS
5 STALLS
500/4 = 125 STALLS
211 STALLS
PAVEMENT BY OTHERS
(SEE ARCHITECTURAL
PLANS)
PROPOSED POND
WETLAND SUMMARY
EAST WETLAND - MANAGE 2
AVERAGE BUFFER REQUIRED (30')
AVERAGE BUFFER PROVIDED
WEST WETLAND - MANAGE 1
AVERAGE BUFFER REQUIRED (25')
AVERAGE BUFFER PROVIDED
AREA OF WETLAND IMPACTED
52,620 SF
53,535 SF
15,084 SF
15,095 SF
846 SF
PROPOSED
WETLAND BUFFER
WETLAND IMPACT
AREA
HA
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 40,345 SF
FFE=1000.00
1000
999
100110021003
995
995
995
998
999
995
100
0
999
100
1
100
2
100
3
10
0
4
10
0
4
995
995
995
995
996
1000
998999
10
0
0
99
9
10
0
1
10
0
2
10
0
3
10
0
4
100010011002100310001001
100
0
998999
10
0
1
10
0
2
99
5
10
0
0
99
4
99
6
99
7
99
8
99
9
10
0
1
10
0
2
10
0
2
10
0
3
10
0
3
10
0
2
10
0
0
993
993
997
993
993
10
'
T
R
A
I
L
A
N
D
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
'
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20' D&U EASEMENT
NO PARKING
NO PARKING
NO PARKING NO PARKING
EVEVEVEV EV
SCALE IN FEET
0 12060
NORTH
Oct 14, 2022 - 8:30am - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-L0-TREE.dwg
L1.01
TREE
PRESERVATION
PLAN
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
This certification is not valid unless wet signed in blue
ink. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of
this survey which is available upon request at
Sambatek, Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/202159119
John R. Workman
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
CALCULATIONS
SIGNIFICANT TREES ON SITE:*
ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVALS FOR INITIAL SITE DEVELOPMENT (10%):
TREES REMOVED FOR INITIAL SITE DEVELOPMENT:
ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVALS FOR OTHER SITE DEVELOPMENT (10%):
TREES REMOVED FOR OTHER SITE DEVELOPMENT:
REQUIRED REPLACEMENT INCHES**:
*ACER NEGUNDO AROUND BUILDINGS NOT INCLUDED IN CALCULATIONS
**SEE L1.02 FOR REPLACEMENT TREES
LEGEND
EASEMENT
CURB & GUTTER
BUILDING
RETAINING WALL
SIGN
PIPE BOLLARD
STANDARD DUTY
ASPHALT PAVING
CONCRETE PAVING
PROPERTY LIMIT
EXISTINGPROPOSED
MEDINA TREE REPLACEMENT CODE
WETLAND LIMITS
TREELINE
TOTALS
76 TREES
8 TREES
(3) TREES
8 TREES
(12) TREES
31 IN
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
S
S
SANITARY SEWER
LANDSCAPE EDING
STORM SEWER
WATERMAIN
FORCEMAIN (SAN.)
YARDDRAIN
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TREE TO BE REMOVED
D
S
LS
RIPRAP
1.Significant Tree is a healthy, deciduous Tree, measuring eight (8) inches in
Diameter or greater, or a healthy coniferous Tree, measuring four (4) inches or
greater in Diameter.
2.Allowed percent of Significant Trees that may be removed: 10%
3.Number and Size of Trees to be Replaced. For Significant Trees located
within an Old Growth Forest Remnant or other significant area identified
by the Natural Resources Inventory, a Tree Replacement ratio of a
Diameter of two (2) caliper inches per one (1) inch of removed Significant
Trees and Lost Trees is required. For all other areas containing
Significant Trees, a Tree Replacement ratio of a Diameter of one (1)
caliper inch per one (1) inch of removed Significant Trees and Lost Trees is required.
4.Minimum Size of Replacement Trees. All deciduous Replacement Trees
shall be a Diameter of at least two (2) caliper inches in size. All
coniferous Replacement Trees shall be at least four (4) feet in height.
5.Identification of areas within Old Growth Remnant Forests, as defined by
the Natural Resources Inventory. If an applicant wishes to adjust the area
based on fieldwork, city staff must review and approve of any adjustment.
TREE INVENTORY
Tree
Number Size Tree Name Status
1 8 Cherry - Black (Prunus serotina)Remove
2 8 Cherry - Black (Prunus serotina)Remove
3 8 Cherry - Black (Prunus serotina)Remove
4 9 Cherry - Black (Prunus serotina)Remove
5 7 Cherry - Black (Prunus serotina)Remove
6 6 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove
7 24 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve
8 18 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve
9 36 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve
10 8 Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
11 20 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
12 21 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
13 23 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
14 10 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
15 10 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
16 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
17 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
18 10 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
19 10 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
20 10 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
21 17 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
22 21 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve
23 22 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve
24 18 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve
25 10 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
26 12 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)Remove
27 13 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve
28 21 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve
29 13 Apple (Malus spp.)Preserve
30 28 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove
31 14 Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Remove
32 13 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove
33 6 Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Remove
34 15 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Dead
35 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
36 13 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
37 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
38 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
39 5 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
40 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
41 10 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
42 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
43 10 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
44 5 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
45 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
46 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
47 5 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
48 5 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
49 6 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
50 5 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
51 7 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
52 5 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
53 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
54 7 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
55 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
56 6 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
57 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
58 10 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
59 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
60 6 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
61 13 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
62 6 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve
63 12 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
64 6 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
65 11 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
66 17 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove
67 6 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
68 4 Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
69 6 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
70 12 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
71 4 Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
72 15 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove
73 14 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
74 12 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
75 9 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
76 9 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
77 8 Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
78 8 Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
79 8 Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
80 8 Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
81 8 Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
82 8 Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
83 8 Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
84 8 Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
85 8 Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
86 8 Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
87 8 Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
88 8 Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
89 11 Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
90 10 Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
91 10 Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)Preserve
92 23 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve
93 29 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Remove
94 11 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove
95 13 Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
96 13 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
97 14 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
98 5 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve
99 13 Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
100 11 Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
101 11 Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
102 19 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve
103 20 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve
104 7 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)Preserve
105 23 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
106 9 Fir - Balsam (Abies balsamea)Preserve
107 18 Fir - Balsam (Abies balsamea)Preserve
108 13 Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
109 12 Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
110 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve
111 9 Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Preserve
112 11 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve
113 8 Fir - Balsam (Abies balsamea)Remove
114 10 Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Remove
115 10 Walnut - Black (Juglans nigra)Remove
HA
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 40,345 SF
FFE=1000.00
2F - EAST POND
HWL100: 995.68
WQE : 994.50
BOT: 993.00
10
'
T
R
A
I
L
A
N
D
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
'
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20' D&U EASEMENT
3F - WEST POND
HWL100: 996.75
WQE: 996.50
BOT: 995.00
1F - NORTH POND
HWL100: 996.48
WQE: 994.50
BOT: 993.00
NO PARKING
NO PARKING
NO PARKING NO PARKING
EVEVEVEV EV
10
0
5
10
0
4
10
0
6
10
0
7
10
0
8
99
2991
990
989
98
8
10
0
7
10
0
5
100
2
100
0
995
992
990
997
988
989
988
990
99
1
99
3
99
5 99
8
99
0
99
2
99
4
99
6
99
9
100
4
10
0
1
99
9
10
0
1
10
0
0
99
8
99
7
99
7
99
8
996
995
996
994
1000
1002
998
995
998
996
1003
10
0
3
10
0
3
10
0
5
10
0
6
10
0
4
10
0
3
10
0
3
100
4
1002
10
0
2
1002
1000 1002
998
10
0
1
10
0
2
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
1
10
0
4
1003100
0
995
997
999
1002
998
997
996
994
992
1004
1003
1002
1000 998
996
998100
0
100
2100
4
10
0
7
10
0
8
10
1
0
1000100110021003
1004
BL
3
PF
3
HT
3
3
HT1
PF
3
JL2
PF
SG
2
HT
3
3
JL
2
SO
1
PF
PF
43
RB
3
WP
PF
1
HL
1
JL
2
JL
2
2
SO
SO
2
HL
1
2
LR
2
LR
4
LR
3
RB
1
HL
RB
2
PF
3
PF
2
SO
5
SG
3
2
SG
JL
2
SG
3
2
PE
2
PE
2
PE
2
PE
RB
3
2
PE
PF
2
JL
1
3
RB
WP
3
2
PE
3
BS
3
LR
BS
6
LR
4
2
WP
2
BS
2
WP
BS
2 WP
2 HL
1
HL
1
HL
1
GRANITE CHIPS
GRANITE CHIPS
WP
2
BS
2
TO
2TO
5
TO
2
WHITE DECORATIVE ROCK
IN PLANTING STRIPS
GRANITE CHIPS
WHITE DECORATIVE ROCK
IN PLANTING STRIPS
WHITE DECORATIVE ROCK
IN PLANTING AREAS
GRANITE CHIPS
BL
2
BL
2HL
1
HL
2
SCALE IN FEET
0 12060
NORTH
Oct 13, 2022 - 3:51pm - User:mlong L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-L1-LSCP.dwg
L1.02
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
This certification is not valid unless wet signed in blue
ink. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of
this survey which is available upon request at
Sambatek, Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/202159119
John R. Workman
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS
ONE OVERSTORY TREE PER 50 FT
ONE ORNAMENTAL TREE PER 100 FT
ONE SHRUB PER 30 FT
TREE REPLACMENT
REPLACEMENT INCHES FROM TREE PRESERVATION PLAN (L1.01)
TOTAL TREES
LEGEND
EASEMENT
CURB & GUTTER
BUILDING
RETAINING WALL
SIGN
PIPE BOLLARD
STANDARD DUTY
ASPHALT PAVING
CONCRETE PAVING
PROPERTY LIMIT
EXISTINGPROPOSED
MEDINA LANDSCAPE CODE
PLANT SCHEDULE
WETLAND LIMITS
TREELINE
PROPOSED
117
41
213
32.5" (13)
153 TREES
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
S
S
SANITARY SEWER
LANDSCAPE EDING
STORM SEWER
WATERMAIN
FORCEMAIN (SAN.)
YARDDRAIN
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
D
S
LS
REQUIRED
82
41
137
31"
Overstory Deciduous Shade Trees and Coniferous Trees- A minimum of one tree per 50 feet, or fraction
thereof, of lot perimeter shall be required. Deciduous trees shall not be less than 2.5 caliper inches
measured four feet off ground, and coniferous trees shall not be less than six feet in height. No more than
25 percent of trees may be of a single species.
Ornamental Trees- A minimum of one tree per 100 feet, or fraction thereof, of lot perimeter shall be
required. Trees shall not be less than two caliper inches measured four feet off ground. No more than 25
percent of trees may be of a single species.
Understory Shrubs- In addition to trees, a full compliment of understory shrubs shall be provided to
complete a quality landscape treatment of the lot. The number of shrubs be less than one per 30 feet, or
fraction thereof, of lot perimeter.
TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY
SG Acer freemanii `Sienna Glen` / Sienna Glen Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 10
RB Betula nigra `Cully` TM / Heritage Birch B & B 2.5"Cal 14
HL Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline` / Skyline Honey Locust B & B 2.5"Cal 9
SO Quercus bicolor / Swamp White Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 11
BL Tilia americana `Boulevard` / Boulevard Linden B & B 2.5"Cal 7
PE Ulmus americana `Princeton` / American Elm B & B 2.5"Cal 12
CONIFERS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY
LR Larix laricina / Tamarack B & B 6`15
BS Picea glauca densata / Black Hills Spruce B & B 6`16
WP Pinus strobus / White Pine B & B 6`14
TO Thuja occidentalis / American Arborvitae B & B 7`9
ORN. TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY
HT Crataegus crus-galli `Inermis` / Thornless Hawthorn B & B 2.5"Cal 9
PF Malus x `Prairifire` / Prairifire Crab Apple B & B 2"Cal 19
JL Syringa reticulata / Japanese Tree Lilac B & B 2"Cal 13
TREE SCHEDULE
SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY
BJ Juniperus sabina `Broadmoor` / Broadmoor Juniper 5 gal 55
CJ Juniperus sabina `Monna` / Calgary Carpet Juniper 5 gal 59
PM Pinus mugo `Slowmound` / Mugo Pine 5 gal 30
PT Potentilla fruticosa `Fargo` TM / Fargo Potentilla 5 gal 134
AC Ribes alpinum / Alpine Currant 5 gal 8
HA Thuja occidentalis `Holmstrup` / Holmstrup Cedar 10 gal 17
TT Thuja occidentalis `Techny` / Techny Arborvitae 5 gal 8
GRASSES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY
CAL Calamagrostis brachytricha / Korean Feather Reed Grass 2 gal.102
KFG Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster` / Feather Reed Grass 1 gal 285
BOG Helictotrichon sempervirens `Sapphire` / Blue Oat Grass 1 gal 267
SNU Sorghastrum nutans / Indian Grass 1 gal 45
PERENNIALS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY
SBA Allium x `Summer Beauty` / Summer Beauty Allium 1 gal 353
PCF Echinacea purpurea `Rubinstern` / Purple Coneflower 1 gal 64
BLF Gaillardia x grandiflora `Arizona Sun` / Blanketflower 1 gal 188
BIG Geranium x cantabrigiense `Biokovo` / Biokovo Cranesbill 1 gal 52
PES Sedum x `Purple Emperor` / Stonecrop 1 gal 108
SHRUB SCHEDULE
RIP-RAP
GROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT
25-131 MNDOT Seed Mix 25-131 / Low Maintenance Fescue mix Seed
33-261 MNDOT Seed Mix 33-261 / Ponds and Wet Areas Seed
35-241 MNDOT Seed Mix 35-241 / Mesic Praire General Seed
GROUNDCOVER SCHEDULE
1.SUBJECT PROPERTIES ADDRESS IS 1400 HAMEL ROAD, ITS PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS
11-118-23-23-0003.
2.THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 20.11 ACRES OR 875,873 SQUARE FEET. THE AREA
AFFECTED BY RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENTS FOR THE CITY OF MEDINA AND HENNEPIN COUNTY IS 0.49
ACRES OR 21,226 SQUARE FEET. THE AREA OF THE REMAINDER IS 19.62 ACRES OR 854,647 SQUARE
FEET.
3.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED BP - BUSINESS PARK, PER CITY OF MEDINA ONLINE ZONING MAP
ACCESSED 07/30/2021.
4.THE BUILDING(S) AND EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS OF THE OUTSIDE WALL AT GROUND LEVEL ARE SHOWN
ON THE SURVEY. IT MAY NOT BE THE FOUNDATION WALL.
Parcel 1:
The East 602 feet of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 118, Range 23, lying
North of the center line of Hamel Road
Parcel 2:
The East 602 feet of the part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township
118, Range 23, lying South of a line drawn Easterly parallel with the North line of said Southwest Quarter
of the Northwest Quarter, from a point on the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter distant 528 feet Southerly from the Northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 118, Range 23
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Torrens Property
1.The bearing system is based on the Hennepin County coordinate system, NAD83 (1986 Adjust), with an
assumed bearing of N 0° 18' 53" W for the West line of NW 1
4 , Section 11 , Township 118 , Range 23.
2.FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 07/29/2021.
1. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS BASED ON NAVD88.
BENCHMARK #1
MNDOT 2722 X
ELEV.=995.36
BENCHMARK #2
MNDOT 2722 AC
ELEV.=992.10
DESCRIPTION PROPERTY SUMMARY
BENCHMARKS
SURVEY NOTES
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS,
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD, BROOKLYN
CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS MANDIR
IN MEDINA
MEDINA,
MINNESOTA
1400 HAMEL ROAD
DJT
1/1
08/04/21
50157
OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL WIRE
LIGHT
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
GUY ANCHOR
UTILITY POLE
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
UNDERGROUND GAS
WOOD FENCE
BUILDING LINE
CONCRETE CURB
BITUMINOUS SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE
WET LAND
SIGN
FEMA FLOOD ZONE LINE
TREE LINE
FOUND MONUMENT
FOUND CAST IRON
MONUMENT
EASEMENT LINE
SETBACK LINE
RESTRICTED ACCESS
FOUND RIGHT-OF-WAY
MONUMENT
SET MONUMENT
MARKED LS 47092
SECTION LINE
UNDERLYING / ADJACENT LOT
TIE LINE
BOUNDARY LINE
DEED DISTANCE(100.00)
CONIFEROUS TREE
TRANSFORMER
BUILDING CANOPY
GAS METER
ELECTRIC MANHOLE
ELECTRIC METER
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
CABLE TV BOX
GATE VALVE / HYDRANT
SANITARY MANHOLE
CLEAN OUT
CULVERT
SPOT ELEVATION
CONTOUR
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
WIRE FENCE
DECIDUOUS TREE
NORTH
SCALE IN FEET
VICINITY MAP LEGEND
PIN
T
O
D
R
SITE
TA
M
A
R
A
C
K
D
R
AR
R
O
W
H
E
A
D
D
R
SOO LI
N
E
R
R
55
118
200100
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed LAND SURVEYOR
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
survey which is available upon request at Sambatek's,
Minnetonka, MN office.
08/04/2147092
Jason J. Howard
Sep 28, 2021 - 5:07pm - User:mlarson L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Survey\Sheets\50157 -EXCON.dwg
C2.02
EXISTING
CONDITIONS
(350' OVERLAP)
10
0
5
10
0
4
10
0
6
10
0
7
10
0
8
99
2991
990
989
98
8
10
0
7
10
0
5
100
2
100
0
995
992
990
997
988
989
988
990
99
1
99
3
99
5 99
8
99
0
99
2
99
4
99
6
99
9
100
4
10
0
1
99
9
10
0
1
10
0
0
99
8
99
7
99
7
99
8
996
995
996
994
1000
1002
998
995
998
996
1003
10
0
3
10
0
3
10
0
5
10
0
6
10
0
4
10
0
3
10
0
3
100
4
1002
10
0
2
1002
1000 1002
998
10
0
1
10
0
2
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
1
10
0
4
1003100
0
995
997
999
1002
998
997
996
994
992
1004
1003
1002
1000 998
996
998100
0
100
2100
4
10
0
7
10
0
8
10
1
0
1000100110021003
1004
HA
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 45,980 SF
FFE=1000.00
1000
999
100110021003
995
995
995
998
999
995
100
0
999
100
1
100
2
100
3
10
0
4
10
0
4
-2.9
%
-1.9%
-25
.
5
%
-2
.
3
%
-2
.
2
%
-2
.
6
%
-2
.
6
%
996.71 997.15
996.74
T/W: 990.46
B/W: 998.13
T/W: 998.49
B/W: 992.07 2F - EAST POND
HWL100: 995.68
WQE : 994.50
BOT: 993.00
999.36
EO
F
1001.30
1000.87
1000.71
EO
F
995
995EO
F
NO PARKING NO PARKING
NO PARKING NO PARKING
995
995
996
998.53
998.65
998.50
998.50
997.93
997.76
997.59
T/W: 998.82
B/W: 991.29
998.02 998.74
EOF
1000
998999
998.64
EO
F
-2.0%
999.00
998.74
10
0
0
99
9
10
0
1
10
0
2
10
0
3
10
0
4
100010011002100310001001
100
0
998999
10
0
1
10
0
2
EO
F10
0
1
EO
F
10
0
2
.
2
1004.50
1003.75
1003.78
1000.20
1000.34
999.90
999.98999.23
999.07
999.88
1000.41
997.11997.39
999.78 999.90
997.22
999.68 999.67
997.81
1000.04
999.07
998.59
998.06
999.62
996.95997.43997.95
998.14998.59-2.0%
998.60
998.79998.91
1000.00-1
.
4
%
-9
.
2
%
1000.00
999.43
999.35
999.33
999.01
1000.001000.00
999.29
999.09
998.52
998.30
-7
.
6
%
1000.00
1000.00
998.09
1000.00
998.25
1000.00
998.25999.25 999.25
99
5
10
0
0
99
4
99
6
99
7
99
8
99
9
10
0
1
10
0
2
10
0
2
10
0
3
10
0
3
10
0
2
10
0
0
999.96
999.41
993
993
997
993
993
997
997.00
998.50
998.50
997.00
997.25
997.25
998.50
998.50
997.34
998.74
998.85
998.65
997.18
EOF 997.19
3F - WEST POND
HWL100: 996.75
WQE: 996.50
BOT: 995.00
EO
F
10
0
3
.
5
0
998.00
996.50
997.25
997.25996.50
1004.54
1002.99
1003.27
1002.62
1003.07
1002.42
1002.79
1003.71
1001.97
1001.20
1002.45
1002.65
1001.40
1002.17
1003.91
1F - NORTH POND
HWL100: 996.48
WQE: 994.50
BOT: 993.00
SEE MNDOT DETAIL 3113D
ON SHEET C9.02 FOR RIP RAP
QUANTITY (TYP)
SCALE IN FEET
0 12060
NORTH
Sep 28, 2021 - 5:08pm - User:mlarson L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-C4-GRADE.dwg
C4.01
GRADING PLAN
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,
Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/202153735
Pete S. Moreau
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
902.5
X902
SPOT ELEVATION
CONTOUR
RIP RAP
OVERFLOW ELEV.
CURB & GUTTER
BUILDING
RETAINING WALL
PROPERTY LIMIT
EXISTINGPROPOSED
LEGEND
WETLAND LIMITS
TREELINE
STORM SEWER
SOIL BORINGS
DRAINTILE
EOF
902.5
D
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED
ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING
SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE
CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY
HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE,
INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
2% MINIMUM SLOPE ON
VEGETATED SWALES (TYPICAL)
HA
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 45,980 SF
FFE=1000.00
2F - EAST POND
HWL100: 995.68
WQE : 994.50
BOT: 993.00
NO PARKING NO PARKING
NO PARKING NO PARKING
10
'
T
R
A
I
L
A
N
D
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
'
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20' D&U EASEMENT
3F - WEST POND
HWL100: 996.75
WQE: 996.50
BOT: 995.00
1F - NORTH POND
HWL100: 996.48
WQE: 994.50
BOT: 993.00
HYDRANT
6" GATE VALVE
8" x 6" TEE
4" DOMESTIC WATER SERICE
CONNECT TO EXISTING 8"
PVC C900
6"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
HYDRANT
6" GATE VALVE
6" TEE
CONNECT TO EXISTING 8"
PVC C900
GREASE INTERCEPTOR
INLET IE=990.80
OUTLET IE=990.55
MH 01
RE=1006.77
IE=988.19 S
IE=988.19 E
IE=988.09 W
163 LF -8" SDR 35
@ 0.40%
8" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
IE=991.54 N
4" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
IE=991.58
4" PVC C900
RELOCATE EXISTING
HYDRANT
39 LF -4" PVC
SCH 40 @ 2.00%
8"x4" WYE
8" SANITARY
STUB
CONNECT TO EXISTING
MANHOLE
IE=987.44
CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL
NEW INFI-SHIELD
250' HYDRANT INFLUENCE
RADIUS (TYP)
8" PVC
C
9
0
0
STUB FOR FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
6" PVC C900 6" FIRE SERVICE
4" CURB STOP
6" GATE VALVE
FIRE DEPARTMENT
CONNECTION
CONNECT TO EXISTING 8"
PVC C900
TEMPORARY
HYDRANT FOR
FLUSHING
167 LF -8" PVC
SCH 40 @ 2.00%
8" GATE VALVE
COORDINATE OFFSITE
IMPROVEMENTS WITH
ADJACENT OWNER
PIV
1
2
3
4
5
99 LF -4" SDR 35
@ 2.00%
CLEANOUT
RE=1002.09
IE=988.56 S
IE=988.56 N
SEE CROSSING
TABLE ON SHEET
C6.02
6
8"
P
V
C
C
9
0
0
10'
12
'
SCALE IN FEET
0 12060
NORTH
Sep 28, 2021 - 5:09pm - User:mlarson L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-C6-UTIL.dwg
C6.01
UTILITY PLAN
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,
Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/202153735
Pete S. Moreau
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
1.THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
"STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS" AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF
MINNESOTA (CEAM), EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THESE
SPECIFICATIONS.
a.ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL
REQUIRMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY
AND MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REQUIREMENTS.
b.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPEN, TURN OFF, INTERFERE WITH, OR ATTACH ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO
OR TAP WATERMAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE
CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF
SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE THE LIABILITY OF CONTRACTOR.
c.A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES, AND HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10-FEET,
BETWEEN OUTSIDE PIPE AND/OR STRUCTURE WALLS, IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATERMAIN AND
SEWER MAIN (BUILDING, STORM AND SANITARY) CROSSINGS.
2.ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN.
a.ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.
b.ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR-35, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
i. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES TO BUILDING SHALL BE PVC SCH 40 CONFORMING TO ASTM
D2665.
ii. ALL SANITARY SEWER REQUIRE A "FLEX SEAL" OR APPROVED EQUAL AS SEALANT FOR
INTERIOR CHIMNEY SECTION.
c.ALL WATERMAIN TO BE DUCTILE IRON - CLASS 52, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
i. ALL WATERMAIN TO HAVE 7.5-FEET OF COVER OVER TOP OF WATERMAIN.
ii. PROVIDE THRUST BLOCKING AND MECHANICAL JOINT RESTRAINTS ON ALL WATERMAIN
JOINTS PER CITY STANDARDS.
d.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE SMOOTH INTERIOR DUAL WALL HDPE PIPE WITH WATERTIGHT
GASKETS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
i. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE FOR ROOF DRAIN SERVICES TO BUILDING SHALL BE PVC SCH 40
CONFORMING TO ASTM D2665.
e.RIP RAP SHALL BE Mn/DOT CLASS 3.
3.COORDINATE ALL BUILDING SERVICE CONNECTION LOCATIONS AND INVERT ELEVATIONS WITH
MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
4.ALL BUILDING SERVICE CONNECTIONS (STORM, SANITARY, WATER) WITH FIVE FEET OR LESS COVER
ARE TO BE INSULATED FROM BUILDING TO POINT WHERE 5-FEET OF COVER IS ACHIEVED.
5.CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO
ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR WILL
BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING
DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT.
6.SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION
PRACTICES, CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE
JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE
WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL
WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION
REVIEW OF CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE
ADEQUACY OF CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
7.ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL
PLACED BENEATH THE SOD.
8.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL
DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO
CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL
CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS.
9.ALL SOILS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT SOILS ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR
THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED
BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE UTILITY BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING
ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND SOIL INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. A GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEERING REPORT HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY:COMPANY:
ADDRESS:
PHONE:
DATED:
CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THIS SOILS REPORT.
10.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF SHOP DRAWINGS FOR MANHOLE AND CATCH BASIN
STRUCTURES TO SAMBATEK. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW 5 WORKING DAYS FOR SHOP DRAWING
REVIEW.
11.CONTRACTOR AND MATERIAL SUPPLIER SHALL DETERMINE THE MINIMUM DIAMETER REQUIRED
FOR EACH STORM SEWER STRUCTURE.
12.WHERE WATERMAIN CROSSES ANY STORM OR SANITARY SEWER, MAINTAIN 18-INCH SEPARATION
AND ADD 4" RIGID INSULATION TO WATERMAIN.
13.THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED WITH VARIATIONS IN
THE UTILITY ASBUILD PLANS, ELEVATIONS, OR LOCATIONS.
14.THE CITY WILL REQUIRE TELEVISING FOR SANITARY PIPE SEWER INSTALLATION PRIOR TO
ACCEPTING A WARRANTY FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS. PROVIDE AND REPORT VIDEO FILES TO THE CITY FOR
REVIEW.
TELEPHONE
ELECTRIC
GAS LINE
FORCEMAIN (SAN.)
EASEMENT
WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER
EXISTINGPROPOSED
STORM SEWER
CURB & GUTTER
DRAINTILE
D
S S
SLS
LEGENDUTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS
QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD
GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE
CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE
FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY
AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND
PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE
ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE
BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH
CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
FOXHOLE RAIN GUARDIAN
HA
M
E
L
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR: 43,780 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 2,200 SF
TOTAL: 45,980 SF
FFE=1000.00
2F - EAST POND
HWL100: 995.68
WQE : 994.50
BOT: 993.00
NO PARKING NO PARKING
NO PARKING NO PARKING
10
'
T
R
A
I
L
A
N
D
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
'
D
&
U
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20' D&U EASEMENT
3F - WEST POND
HWL100: 996.75
WQE: 996.50
BOT: 995.00
1F - NORTH POND
HWL100: 996.48
WQE: 994.50
BOT: 993.00
CBMH102
RE=998.65
IE=993.67 W
IE=993.67 E
CBMH104
RE=998.07
IE=994.44 S
IE=994.44 E
CBMH101
RE=998.06
IE=993.39 W
IE=995.26 S
IE=993.39 E
FES100
IE=993.00 W
OCS 201
WITH MODEL 24R
SNOUT SKIMMER
RE=996.00
IE=991.25 NW
IE=993.00 N
IE=991.25 SE
OCS 301
WITH MODEL 24R
SNOUT SKIMMER
RE=994.50
IE=991.16 SE
IE=991.16 W
IE=993.00 S
IE=991.16 NE
FES 200
IE=991.00 NW
FES 601
IE=991.97 NE
FES 600
IE=991.52 SW
27 LF - 12"
HDPE @ 0.50%
126 LF - 15"
HDPE @ 0.50%
56 LF - 15"
HDPE @ 0.50%
37 LF - 24"
HDPE @ 0.50%
46 LF - 15"
CLASS II RCP @ 0.54%
31 LF - 12"
CLASS II RCP @ 0.50%
45 LF - 12"
CLASS II RCP @ 0.52%
89 LF - 24"
CLASS II RCP @ 0.50%
CBMH103
RE=998.50
IE=994.30 W
IE=994.30 E
FES 500
IE=992.50 NW
OCS 501
WITH MODEL 24R
SNOUT SKIMMER
RE=997.43
IE=992.50 NE
IE=992.50 W
IE=995.00 NW
IE=992.73 SE
100 LF - 12"
HDPE @ 0.50%
CBMH106
RE=998.25
IE=995.52 S
IE=995.52 N
CBMH107
RE=998.06
IE=999.81 E
IE=996.06 N
CBMH101-A
RE=998.74
IE=995.48 W
IE=995.48 N
108 LF - 12"
HDPE @ 0.50%
8 LF - 12" PVC
SCH 40 @ 2.00%
CBMH105
RE=998.25
IE=995.02 S
IE=995.02 N
116 LF - 12" PVC
SCH 40 @ 0.50%
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.64
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.64
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.65
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.66
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.23
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.61
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.62
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.85
CO
RE=995.00
IE=992.99
CO
RE=995.00
IE=993.07
CO
RE=995.00
IE=992.57
CO
RE=995.00
IE=992.61
CO
RE=993.00
IE=991.63
CO
RE=995.97
IE=991.38
4" PVC SCH 40 DRAINTILE @ 0.5%
4" PVC SCH 40
DRAINTILE @ 0.5%
4" PVC SCH 40 DRAINTILE @ 0.5%
CONTRACTOR SHALL
INSTALL 12” CL. II RIP RAP
WITH GEOTEXTILE FILTER
FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE
WITH STANDARD PLATE
DETAILS 3133. REFER TO
SHEET C9.01 FOR DETAILS.
(TYP)
CBMH100A
RE=997.20
SUMP DEPTH=4'
IE=993.20 W
IE=993.20 E
47 LF - 8"
PVC SCH 40 @ 2.00%
41 LF - 24"
CLASS II RCP @ 0.49%
44 LF - 24"
HDPE @ 0.50%
CONTRACTOR SHALL
INSTALL 12” CL. II RIP RAP
WITH GEOTEXTILE FILTER
FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE
WITH STANDARD PLATE
DETAILS 3133. REFER TO
SHEET C9.01 FOR DETAILS.
(TYP)
CONTRACTOR SHALL
INSTALL 12” CL. II RIP RAP
WITH GEOTEXTILE FILTER
FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE
WITH STANDARD PLATE
DETAILS 3133. REFER TO
SHEET C9.01 FOR DETAILS.
(TYP)
FES 300
IE=991.00 SW
FES 202
IE=993.00
13 LF - 15"
RCP @ 0.00%
7 LF - 12"
RCP @ 0.00%
8 LF - 12"
RCP @ 0.00%
FES 502
IE=995.00 SE
FES 302
IE=993.00 N
1
2
3
4
5
6
10'
12
'
SCALE IN FEET
0 12060
NORTH
Sep 28, 2021 - 5:09pm - User:mlarson L:\PROJECTS\50157\CAD\Civil\Sheets\50157-C6-UTIL.dwg
C6.02
STORM SEWER
PLAN
Project
Location
Date Submittal / RevisionNo.
Certification
Sheet Title
Summary
Revision History
Sheet No.Revision
Project No.
By
Designed:Drawn:
Approved:Book / Page:
Phase:Initial Issue:
Client
BAPS
MINNEAPOLIS
LLC
2300 FREEWAY BLVD
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
BAPS HINDU
TEMPLE
MEDINA, MN
1400 HAMEL ROAD
MLL JMW
PSM
PRELIMINARY 08/12/2021
50157
Registration No.Date:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this
plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's,
Minnetonka, MN office.
08/12/202153735
Pete S. Moreau
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
8/19/21 MLL SITE PLAN REVIEW
9/1/21 MLL CITY COMMENT RESPONSE
9/28/21 MLL CITY/ECWMC COMMENT RESPONSE
TELEPHONE
ELECTRIC
GAS LINE
FORCEMAIN (SAN.)
EASEMENT
WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER
EXISTINGPROPOSED
STORM SEWER
CURB & GUTTER
DRAINTILE
D
S S
SLS
LEGEND
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS
QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD
GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE
CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE
FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY
AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND
PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE
ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE
BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH
CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
FOXHOLE RAIN GUARDIAN
UTILITY CROSSINGS
NUMBER WATERMAIN SANITARY STORM SEPARATION
1 996.67 BOTTOM 988.65 TOP 8.01'
2 996.63 BOTTOM 988.95 TOP 7.68'
3 991.32 TOP 993.57 BOTTOM 2.18'
4 991.67 TOP 993.68 BOTTOM 2.01'
5 991.53 TOP 994.02 BOTTOM 2.49'
6 991.69 TOP 993.99 BOTTOM 2.30'
*MAINTAIN 18-INCH MINIMUM SEPARATION AT WATERMAIN CROSSINGS. PROVIDE 4" RIGID
INSULATION BETWEEN WATERMAIN AND SEWER CROSSINGS, SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C9.01.
W
D
DW
W D 1
2
LJKIGFEDC
3
4
428 SF
WOMENS
RESTROOMS 2
374 SF
MENS
RESTROOMS 2
3861 SF
SABHA HALL
19 SF
CUST
24 SF
CUST
103 SF
TABLE WARE
STOR
81 SF
EQUIP STOR
45 SF
CHANGING
98 SF
iOFFICE
231 SF
BOARD RM
1785 SF
iCORRIDOR
2474 SF
PRAYER HALL
189
S
F
VA
G
H
A
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
73 SF
PUJA
STOR/ AV
392 SF
iCLASSROOM 1
870 SF
iCLASSROOM 4/5
392 SF
iCLASSROOM 2
98
S
F
WA
L
K
I
N
CO
O
L
E
R
123 SF
PANTRY
1428 SF
KITCHEN
5179 SF
GYM/ DINING
623 SF
DECORATION W/
STORAGE
696 SF
AKSHARPITH/
SHAYONA
161
S
F
VE
S
T
2176 SF
eCORRIDOR
136
S
F
AK
S
H
A
R
P
I
T
H
ST
O
R
221
S
F
FA
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
S
T
O
R
113 SF
TELECOM/
DATA &
IT
57 SF
MECH/
ELEC
2657 SF
LOBBY
319 SF
DINING STORAGE
145 SF
STAGE STORAGE
215 SF
WOMENS
REST 1 163 SF
MENS
REST 1
148 SF
iNURSURY202 SF
ACCOUNTING
203 SF
GREEN RM
2020 SF
ADD'L SEATING
178 SF
GUEST SERV
92
S
F
MO
T
H
E
R
S
RM
1011 SF
SANT NIVAS
392 SF
eCLASSROOM 1
867 SF
eCLASSROOM 4/5
392 SF
eCLASSROOM 2
85 SF
eOFFICE
168 SF
MAIN ELEC
131 SF
WASHING
154 SF
COOKWARE
STORAGE
225 SF
AV/IT
1609 SF
STAGE
173 SF
HALL STORAGE
145
S
F
CO
R
R
I
D
O
R
82 SF
WALK IN
FREEZER129 SF
VEST
69 SF
eNURSURY
392 SF
iCLASSROOM3
392 SF
eCLASSROOM 3
59 SF
PANTRY
108 SF
CLASS STOR
108
S
F
CU
S
T
O
D
I
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
73 SF
FAMILY
TLT
82 SF
FAMILY
TLT
33 SF
STOR
34 SF
STOR
231 SF
MENS
CLOAK
231 SF
WOMENS
CLOAK
A 5.01
F177 SF
FIRE RISER
88 SF
CATERING
OFFICE 54 SF
TRASH
11
T
11
T
11
T
11
T
11
T
11
T
AR
E
A
A
AR
E
A
B
129 SF
VEST
BA2
AWNING ABOVE
A H
SKYFOLD PARTITION SYSTEM
115 SF
FACILITIES
FUTURE EXPANSION
PHASE 2
4,500 SQFT
FUTURE
EXPANSION
PHASE 2
1,000 SQFT
COURTYARD FLEX SPACE
AR
E
A
A
AR
E
A
B
M N O
10' - 0" 6' - 0" 30' - 10"30' - 0" 11' - 8" 20' - 6" 20' - 6" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 19' - 6" 19' - 6" 17' - 0"86' - 3 1/4"12' - 6 1/2"
1353 SF
PUJARI NIVAS
32
'
-
8
"
80
'
-
0
"
32
'
-
8
"
85' - 7 1/2"
61
'
-
0
1
/
4
"
BUILDING FOOTPRINT SUMMARY
CURRENT PHASE 1: 40,120 SQFT
+ FUTURE EXPANSION: 5,500 SQFT
TOTAL SQFT: 45,620 SQFT
60 SF
RESTROOM
AREA A AREA B
TRUE NORTH
AREA KEY
Project No:
F
E
D
C
B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
DIPEN PATEL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER
3600 W 153rd St.
Leawood, KS 66224
p.816.686.2234
NOTE: Please refer to contractor/engineer for
any applicable building codes.
A
MISHA PATEL
3600 W 153rd St.
Leawood, KS 66224
p.816.686.2234
INTERIOR COORDINATOR
DATE ISSUED:
OCTOBER 12, 2022
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTOR
These plans are the property of the design team. Any
reproduction of these plans in whole or part or the
preparation of derivative works thereof without the
expressed written permission of the design team is
entirely prohibited.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
CIVIL ENGINEER
MEP ENGINEER
CODE & LIFE SAFETY
A 1.01
BAPS MINNEAPOLIS
MANDIR
Medina, MN
205010
SD PHASE
FLOOR PLAN
SQFT BREAKDOWN
Name Area Department
BOARD RM 231 SF ADMIN
ACCOUNTING 202 SF ADMIN
GUEST SERV 178 SF ADMIN
AKSHARPITH/ SHAYONA 696 SF AKSHARPITH
AKSHARPITH STOR 136 SF AKSHARPITH
WOMENS RESTROOMS 2 428 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
CUST 19 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
CUST 24 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MENS RESTROOMS 2 374 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
DECORATION W/ STORAGE 623 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
FACILITIES STOR 221 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
TELECOM/ DATA & IT 113 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MECH/ ELEC 57 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
WOMENS REST 1 215 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
WOMENS CLOAK 231 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MENS REST 1 163 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MAIN ELEC 168 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
CLASS STOR 108 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
CUSTODIAL SERVICES 108 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MENS CLOAK 231 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
FIRE RISER 77 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
FACILITIES 115 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
iCORRIDOR 1785 SF CIRCULATION
VEST 161 SF CIRCULATION
eCORRIDOR 2176 SF CIRCULATION
LOBBY 2657 SF CIRCULATION
CORRIDOR 145 SF CIRCULATION
VEST 129 SF CIRCULATION
STOR 33 SF CIRCULATION
STOR 34 SF CIRCULATION
VEST 129 SF CIRCULATION
iOFFICE 98 SF CLASSROOMS
iCLASSROOM 1 392 SF CLASSROOMS
iCLASSROOM 4/5 870 SF CLASSROOMS
iCLASSROOM 2 392 SF CLASSROOMS
eCLASSROOM 1 392 SF CLASSROOMS
eCLASSROOM 4/5 867 SF CLASSROOMS
eCLASSROOM 2 392 SF CLASSROOMS
eOFFICE 85 SF CLASSROOMS
iCLASSROOM3 392 SF CLASSROOMS
eCLASSROOM 3 392 SF CLASSROOMS
TABLE WARE STOR 103 SF GYMNASIUM
EQUIP STOR 81 SF GYMNASIUM
GYM/ DINING 5179 SF GYMNASIUM
DINING STORAGE 319 SF GYMNASIUM
CHANGING 45 SF KITCHEN
WALK IN COOLER 98 SF KITCHEN
PANTRY 123 SF KITCHEN
KITCHEN 1428 SF KITCHEN
WASHING 131 SF KITCHEN
COOKWARE STORAGE 154 SF KITCHEN
WALK IN FREEZER 82 SF KITCHEN
CATERING OFFICE 88 SF KITCHEN
TRASH 54 SF KITCHEN
PRAYER HALL 2474 SF PRAYER
VAGHA STORAGE 189 SF PRAYER
PUJA STOR/ AV 73 SF PRAYER
SABHA HALL 3861 SF SABHA HALL
STAGE STORAGE 145 SF SABHA HALL
iNURSURY 148 SF SABHA HALL
GREEN RM 203 SF SABHA HALL
ADD'L SEATING 2020 SF SABHA HALL
MOTHERS RM 92 SF SABHA HALL
AV/IT 225 SF SABHA HALL
STAGE 1609 SF SABHA HALL
HALL STORAGE 173 SF SABHA HALL
eNURSURY 69 SF SABHA HALL
FAMILY TLT 73 SF SABHA HALL
FAMILY TLT 82 SF SABHA HALL
SANT NIVAS 1011 SF STAFF
PANTRY 59 SF STAFF
PUJARI NIVAS 1353 SF STAFF
Grand total: 72 37981 SF
1/16" = 1'-0"F1 FLOOR PLAN
W
D
W D
1
2
IGFEDC
3
4
25' - 9 1/4"
3861 SF
SABHA HALL
98 SF
iOFFICE
231 SF
BOARD RM
1785 SF
iCORRIDOR
2474 SF
PRAYER HALL
189
S
F
VA
G
H
A
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
73 SF
PUJA STOR/ AV
392 SF
iCLASSROOM 1
392 SF
iCLASSROOM 2
623 SF
DECORATION W/
STORAGE
696 SF
AKSHARPITH/
SHAYONA
161
S
F
VE
S
T
2176 SF
eCORRIDOR
136 SF
AKSHARPITH
STOR
113 SF
TELECOM/
DATA &
IT
57 SF
MECH/ ELEC
2657 SF
LOBBY
215 SF
WOMENS REST 1
163 SF
MENS REST 1
148 SF
iNURSURY
20
2
S
F
AC
C
O
U
N
T
I
N
G
2020 SF
ADD'L SEATING
178 SF
GUEST SERV
92 SF
MOTHERS RM
1011 SF
SANT NIVAS
392 SF
eCLASSROOM 1
392 SF
eCLASSROOM 2
85 SF
eOFFICE
225 SF
AV/IT
1609 SF
STAGE
173 SF
HALL STORAGE
145
S
F
CO
R
R
I
D
O
R
69 SF
eNURSURY
392 SF
iCLASSROOM3
392 SF
eCLASSROOM 3
59 SF
PANTRY
108 SF
CUSTODIAL
SERVICES
73 SF
FAMILY TLT
33 SF
STOR
34 SF
STOR
33
'
-
3
1
/
4
"
231 SF
MENS CLOAK
231 SF
WOMENS CLOAK
AR
E
A
A
AR
E
A
B
270 CHAIR STORAGE
54 CHAIRS51 CHAIRS
60 CHAIRS50 CHAIRS
54 CHAIRS
51 CHAIRS
192 CHAIRS
SKYFOLD PARTITION SYSTEM
SABHA HALL SEATING NOTES
516 CHAIR SEATING CAPACITY
324 ON FRONT HALF
192 ON BACK HALF
24
'
-
4
"
17' - 6"20' - 0"20' - 0"
15' - 9"
9' - 6"22' - 0"9' - 6"17' - 0"17' - 0"
AR
E
A
A
AR
E
A
B
11
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
12
'
-
4
"
15' - 4 1/4"
3'
-
0
3
/
4
"
15
'
-
1
0
3
/
4
"
24' - 0"
6' - 0"
2'
-
9
"
5'
-
0
"
BA2A
INFO SCREENS
TRANSACTION WINDOW
6' - 0" 13' - 0" 8' - 8 1/2" 13' - 9"
11
'
-
5
1
/
4
"
4' - 3" 11' - 8"20' - 6" 5' - 6" 7' - 6" 7' - 6" 1' - 0" 24' - 0 1/4" 1' - 0" 7' - 3 3/4" 8"
A 5.02
2
A 5.02
4
STORAGE
PROVIDE SINK
FOR ABHISHEK
8'
-
1
1
1
/
2
"
7'
-
4
1
/
2
"
4' - 0" 9' - 4"
21
'
-
7
"
9' - 4"20' - 11 1/2" 7' - 8 1/2" 5' - 3 3/4" 7' - 0" 16' - 0 1/2" 10' - 4 1/4" 5' - 3 3/4" 9' - 3 3/4" 17' - 0"17' - 0"
10' - 0" 6' - 0"30' - 10"30' - 0"11' - 8"20' - 6"20' - 6"17' - 0"17' - 0"
NEELKANTH
VARNI ABHISHEK
20' - 3"9' - 0" 15' - 0" 8' - 11" 5' - 6" 7' - 6" 8' - 2"24' - 1" 1' - 0" 7' - 6"
16
'
-
8
1
/
4
"
53
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
1
0
"
H
10
'
-
0
"
35
'
-
5
1
/
4
"
10
'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
4
'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
2'
-
0
"
1
6
'
-
0
"
300 SHOE STOR
4'
-
0
"
6'
-
0
"
2
'
-
9
"
24' - 0"
SINHASAN
14' - 5"
16
'
-
8
1
/
4
"
AWNING ABOVE
CURTAIN TRACK
ABOVE
CURTAIN TRACK ABOVE
W/DECORATIVE GUARD RAIL
10
'
-
9
1
/
2
"
2'
-
6
"
13
'
-
3
1
/
2
"
11
'
-
0
1
/
2
"
8'
-
4
"
8'
-
4
"
12' - 4 3/4" 8' - 8 3/4" 8' - 9 3/4" 2' - 6" 11' - 8" 9' - 3 3/4"
2'
-
3
1
/
4
"
7
'
-
4
3
/
4
"
9"
SO
U
N
D
LI
G
H
T
I
N
G
VI
D
E
O
11
'
-
0
1
/
2
"
26' - 4 3/4"
PROVIDE
MICROWAVE
& MINIFRIDGE
6' - 0"
13
'
-
2
"
24
'
-
4
"
3'
-
6
"
12
'
-
4
"
12
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
4
"
8
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
6' - 6" 7' - 6"
14' - 0"
6'
-
6
"
12' - 7"
6' - 5" 16' - 4 3/4"7'
-
0
"
4'
-
0
"
7' - 0"
3' - 6"
1353 SF
PUJARI NIVAS
12
'
-
3
"
9' - 8 1/4"
47' - 1 1/2"
12
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
6' - 0"24' - 9 1/2"6' - 0"
35
'
-
4
1
/
4
"
7' - 10 1/2" 20' - 2 1/2"
WIC WIC
7'
-
0
"
53
'
-
0
"
7'
-
0
"
38' - 8 3/4"55' - 0 1/4"
93' - 9"
67
'
-
0
"
9'
-
8
1
/
4
"
24
'
-
4
"
8'
-
4
"
4'
-
1
0
"
ISLAND
MUDROOM
STOR
LAUNDRY W/
DRYING RODS
ABOVE
OFFICE OFFICE
PROVIDE DEDICATED COOLING FOR SERVER LOCATION
PROVIDE FLOOR
DRAIN FOR BOILERS,
ZONE TO SERVE ALL
PUBLIC RESTROOMS
PROVIDE FLOOR
DRAIN FOR BOILERS,
ZONE TO SERVE
SANT NIVAS &
PUJARI NIVAS
10
'
-
0
"
6'
-
9
3
/
4
"
7'
-
6
"
60 SF
RESTROOM WHITEBOARD, TV PER
ENLARGED DETAIL
AREA A AREA B
TRUE NORTH
AREA KEY
Project No:
F
E
D
C
B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
DIPEN PATEL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER
3600 W 153rd St.
Leawood, KS 66224
p.816.686.2234
NOTE: Please refer to contractor/engineer for
any applicable building codes.
A
MISHA PATEL
3600 W 153rd St.
Leawood, KS 66224
p.816.686.2234
INTERIOR COORDINATOR
DATE ISSUED:
OCTOBER 12, 2022
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTOR
These plans are the property of the design team. Any
reproduction of these plans in whole or part or the
preparation of derivative works thereof without the
expressed written permission of the design team is
entirely prohibited.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
CIVIL ENGINEER
MEP ENGINEER
CODE & LIFE SAFETY
A 1.01A
BAPS MINNEAPOLIS
MANDIR
Medina, MN
205010
SD PHASE
FLOOR PLAN- AREA A
SQFT BREAKDOWN
Name Area Department
BOARD RM 231 SF ADMIN
ACCOUNTING 202 SF ADMIN
GUEST SERV 178 SF ADMIN
AKSHARPITH/ SHAYONA 696 SF AKSHARPITH
AKSHARPITH STOR 136 SF AKSHARPITH
WOMENS RESTROOMS 2 428 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
CUST 19 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
CUST 24 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MENS RESTROOMS 2 374 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
DECORATION W/ STORAGE 623 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
FACILITIES STOR 221 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
TELECOM/ DATA & IT 113 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MECH/ ELEC 57 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
WOMENS REST 1 215 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
WOMENS CLOAK 231 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MENS REST 1 163 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MAIN ELEC 168 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
CLASS STOR 108 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
CUSTODIAL SERVICES 108 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
MENS CLOAK 231 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
FIRE RISER 77 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
FACILITIES 115 SF BUILDING SUPPORT
iCORRIDOR 1785 SF CIRCULATION
VEST 161 SF CIRCULATION
eCORRIDOR 2176 SF CIRCULATION
LOBBY 2657 SF CIRCULATION
CORRIDOR 145 SF CIRCULATION
VEST 129 SF CIRCULATION
STOR 33 SF CIRCULATION
STOR 34 SF CIRCULATION
VEST 129 SF CIRCULATION
iOFFICE 98 SF CLASSROOMS
iCLASSROOM 1 392 SF CLASSROOMS
iCLASSROOM 4/5 870 SF CLASSROOMS
iCLASSROOM 2 392 SF CLASSROOMS
eCLASSROOM 1 392 SF CLASSROOMS
eCLASSROOM 4/5 867 SF CLASSROOMS
eCLASSROOM 2 392 SF CLASSROOMS
eOFFICE 85 SF CLASSROOMS
iCLASSROOM3 392 SF CLASSROOMS
eCLASSROOM 3 392 SF CLASSROOMS
TABLE WARE STOR 103 SF GYMNASIUM
EQUIP STOR 81 SF GYMNASIUM
GYM/ DINING 5179 SF GYMNASIUM
DINING STORAGE 319 SF GYMNASIUM
CHANGING 45 SF KITCHEN
WALK IN COOLER 98 SF KITCHEN
PANTRY 123 SF KITCHEN
KITCHEN 1428 SF KITCHEN
WASHING 131 SF KITCHEN
COOKWARE STORAGE 154 SF KITCHEN
WALK IN FREEZER 82 SF KITCHEN
CATERING OFFICE 88 SF KITCHEN
TRASH 54 SF KITCHEN
PRAYER HALL 2474 SF PRAYER
VAGHA STORAGE 189 SF PRAYER
PUJA STOR/ AV 73 SF PRAYER
SABHA HALL 3861 SF SABHA HALL
STAGE STORAGE 145 SF SABHA HALL
iNURSURY 148 SF SABHA HALL
GREEN RM 203 SF SABHA HALL
ADD'L SEATING 2020 SF SABHA HALL
MOTHERS RM 92 SF SABHA HALL
AV/IT 225 SF SABHA HALL
STAGE 1609 SF SABHA HALL
HALL STORAGE 173 SF SABHA HALL
eNURSURY 69 SF SABHA HALL
FAMILY TLT 73 SF SABHA HALL
FAMILY TLT 82 SF SABHA HALL
SANT NIVAS 1011 SF STAFF
PANTRY 59 SF STAFF
PUJARI NIVAS 1353 SF STAFF
Grand total: 72 37981 SF
1/8" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN- AREA A
DW
1
2
LJKI
3
4
428 SF
WOMENS
RESTROOMS 2
374 SF
MENS
RESTROOMS 2
19 SF
CUST
24 SF
CUST
103 SF
TABLE WARE
STOR
81 SF
EQUIP STOR
45 SF
CHANGING
870 SF
iCLASSROOM 4/5
392 SF
iCLASSROOM 2
98
S
F
WA
L
K
I
N
C
O
O
L
E
R
123 SF
PANTRY
1428 SF
KITCHEN
5179 SF
GYM/ DINING
221 SF
FACILITIES STOR
319 SF
DINING STORAGE
145 SF
STAGE STORAGE
203 SF
GREEN RM
867 SF
eCLASSROOM 4/5
392 SF
eCLASSROOM 2
168 SF
MAIN ELEC
131 SF
WASHING
154 SF
COOKWARE
STORAGE
1609 SF
STAGE
82
S
F
WA
L
K
I
N
FR
E
E
Z
E
R
129 SF
VEST
392 SF
iCLASSROOM3
392 SF
eCLASSROOM 3
108 SF
CLASS STOR73 SF
FAMILY TLT
82 SF
FAMILY TLT
34 SF
STOR
77 SF
FIRE RISER
88 SF
CATERING OFFICE 54 SF
TRASH
11
T
11
T
11
T
11
T
11
T
11
T
AR
E
A
A
AR
E
A
B
129 SF
VEST
21' - 4"
A 5.01
F1
PROVIDE EXHAUST
& EPOXY FLOOR
17' - 0"39' - 9"
17' - 0"19' - 6"19' - 6"17' - 0"86' - 3 1/4"12' - 6 1/2"
1' - 0"
17' - 0" 4' - 6" 12' - 6" 5' - 0" 4' - 6" 13' - 0" 3"
7' - 0"25' - 0"6' - 1 3/4" 14' - 0 1/2"22' - 1 1/2"84' - 10 1/2"14' - 3 1/2"
12
'
-
0
"
17' - 0"39' - 9"
8' - 8 1/2" 8' - 3 1/2"21' - 1 3/4"
12' - 8"19' - 8" 6' - 6" 17' - 3" 7' - 2 1/4" 9' - 9"
13
'
-
9
"
8'
-
2
"
11
'
-
9
"
8' - 0"
10
'
-
0
"
8'
-
4
"
1
1
'
-
4
"
1
3
'
-
6
"
7'
-
1
1
3
/
4
"
25
'
-
0
"
13
'
-
4
"
6
'
-
4
"
8
'
-
6
1
/
4
"
8' - 9" 16' - 2"13' - 4" 8' - 0"
3'
-
0
"
13' - 4"
24
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
8'
-
3
1
/
2
"
22
'
-
2
1
/
2
"
7'
-
4
"
20
'
-
7
"
22
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
7'
-
3
3
/
4
"
9
'
-
9
"
24
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
7' - 0"
4'
-
1
"
6' - 3"
17' - 0" 4' - 6" 12' - 6" 5' - 0" 4' - 6" 13' - 0"
13
'
-
0
1
/
2
"
50
'
-
5
1
/
4
"
10
'
-
6
1
/
2
"
7'
-
6
"
8'
-
5
"
9'
-
7
1
/
2
"
FUTURE EXPANSION
PHASE 2
4,500 SQFT
FUTURE EXPANSION
PHASE 2
1,000 SQFT
COURTYARD FLEX SPACE
85 SHOE STOR
COAT RACK
7'
-
0
"
85 SHOE STOR
COAT RACK
PLAYGROUND FLEX SPACE
61
'
-
3
1
/
4
"
50' - 7"
M N O
115 SF
FACILITIES
8' - 0"
SEE ENLARGED KITCHEN PLAN
24
'
-
4
"
8'
-
4
"
2' - 6" 12' - 0" 2' - 6" 2' - 6" 12' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0"12' - 0" 2' - 6"
AR
E
A
A
AR
E
A
B
AR
E
A
A
AR
E
A
B
AR
E
A
A
AR
E
A
B
PROVIDE FLOOR DRAIN FOR
BOILERS, ZONE TO SERVE KITCHEN
40" HIGH
8' - 3 3/4" 2' - 8" 4' - 0" 20' - 0" 4' - 0" 8' - 0" 4' - 0" 20' - 0" 4' - 0" 2' - 8" 7' - 11 3/4"
85' - 0"
AREA A AREA B
TRUE NORTH
AREA KEY
Project No:
F
E
D
C
B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
DIPEN PATEL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER
3600 W 153rd St.
Leawood, KS 66224
p.816.686.2234
NOTE: Please refer to contractor/engineer for
any applicable building codes.
A
MISHA PATEL
3600 W 153rd St.
Leawood, KS 66224
p.816.686.2234
INTERIOR COORDINATOR
DATE ISSUED:
OCTOBER 12, 2022
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTOR
These plans are the property of the design team. Any
reproduction of these plans in whole or part or the
preparation of derivative works thereof without the
expressed written permission of the design team is
entirely prohibited.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
CIVIL ENGINEER
MEP ENGINEER
CODE & LIFE SAFETY
A 1.01B
BAPS MINNEAPOLIS
MANDIR
Medina, MN
205010
SD PHASE
FLOOR PLAN- AREA B
1/8" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN- AREA B
GROUND FLOOR
1002' -0"
T.O. ROOF
1036' -0"
LOWER ROOF
1014' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
1042' -0"
LOWER PARAPET
1019' -0"
L JK I G F E D C B A2 AHMNO
16' - 0"30' - 10"30' - 0"11' - 8"20' - 6"20' - 6"17' - 0"17' - 0"17' - 0"19' - 6"19' - 6"17' - 0"86' - 3 1/4"12' - 6 1/2"
T.O. SPIRE
1052' -0"
12
'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
17
'
-
0
"
6'
-
0
"
10
'
-
0
"
ORNAMENTAL
FIBERGLASS
ELEMENTS
CORRUGATED
METAL PANEL, DARK
CONCEALED FASTENER
VERTICAL METAL PANEL STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOF
SLATE RAIN-SCREEN CLADDINGWOOD LOOK METAL PANEL HEAVY TIMBER COLUMNS
ALUMINUM STORE FRONT SYSTEM
CORRUGATED
METAL PANEL, DARK
ALUMINUM
STOREFRONT
SYSTEM
GROUND FLOOR
1002' -0"
T.O. ROOF
1036' -0"
LOWER ROOF
1014' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
1042' -0"
LOWER PARAPET
1019' -0"
1234
T.O. SPIRE
1052' -0"10
'
-
0
"
6
'
-
0
"
1
7
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
1
2
'
-
0
"
32' - 8"80' - 0"32' - 8"
ORNAMENTAL
FIBERGLASS
ELEMENTS (BEYOND)
METAL AWNING
ABOVE DOOR
STUCCO
ALUMINUM STORE FRONT
ENTRY SYSTEM
WOOD LOOK METAL PANELSLATE CLADDING
METAL AWNING
ABOVE DOOR
GROUND FLOOR
1002' -0"
T.O. ROOF
1036' -0"
LOWER ROOF
1014' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
1042' -0"
LOWER PARAPET
1019' -0"
LJKIGFEDCBA2AH M N O
T.O. SPIRE
1052' -0"
10' - 0" 6' - 0" 30' - 10"30' - 0" 11' - 8" 20' - 6" 20' - 6" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 19' - 6" 19' - 6" 17' - 0"86' - 3 1/4"12' - 6 1/2"
10
'
-
0
"
6
'
-
0
"
1
7
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
1
2
'
-
0
"
DECORATIVE
FIBERGLASS PARAPET
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOF
HEAVY TIMBER COLUMNS
WOOD LOOK
METAL PANEL
SLATE CLADDING
ORNAMENTAL FIBERGLASS
ELEMENTS
ALUMINUM
STOREFRONT SYSTEM
METAL AWNING
STUCCO
SLATE CLADDING
STUCCO
GROUND FLOOR
1002' -0"
T.O. ROOF
1036' -0"
LOWER ROOF
1014' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
1042' -0"
LOWER PARAPET
1019' -0"
1 2 3 4
T.O. SPIRE
1052' -0"
32' - 8"80' - 0"32' - 8"
10
'
-
0
"
6
'
-
0
"
1
7
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
1
2
'
-
0
"
ORNAMENTAL
FIBERGLASS
ELEMENTS
CONCRETE PANEL
MAIN ENTRY CANOPY
STUCCO
DECORATIVE
FIBERGLASS
PARAPET
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOF
SLATE RAIN-SCREEN CLADDING
WOOD LOOK METAL PANEL
HEAVY TIMBER COLUMNS
ALUMINUM STORE FRONT SYSTEM
ALUMINUM STORE FRONT SYSTEM
MATERIAL LEGEND
PRODUCT: WOOD LOOK METAL PANEL
COMPANY: LONGBOARD
PROFILE: 6" V GROOVE
COLOR: LIGHT NATIONAL WALNUT
PRODUCT: SLATE CLADDING
COMPANY: CUPACLAD
PROFILE: 101 LOGIC
COLOR: NATURAL SLATE
PRODUCT: STUCCO
COMPANY: DRYVIT
PROFILE: SANDPEBBLE FINE
COLOR: SW TRICORN BLACK
PRODUCT: ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
COMPANY: KAWNEER
PROFILE: 451 UT
COLOR: BLACK
PRODUCT: CONCRETE PANELS
COMPANY: RIEDER
PROFILE: 1/2" GFRC PANELS
COLOR: GREY SCALE
FACADE % BREAKDOWN
WOOD LOOK METAL PANEL5.08%
SLATE CLADDING17.28%
STUCCO65.13%
GLASS10.09%
TRANSLUCENT PANEL1.22%
CONCRETE PANELS1.19%
Project No:
F
E
D
C
B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
DIPEN PATEL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER
3600 W 153rd St.
Leawood, KS 66224
p.816.686.2234
NOTE: Please refer to contractor/engineer for
any applicable building codes.
A
MISHA PATEL
3600 W 153rd St.
Leawood, KS 66224
p.816.686.2234
INTERIOR COORDINATOR
DATE ISSUED:
OCTOBER 12, 2022
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTOR
These plans are the property of the design team. Any
reproduction of these plans in whole or part or the
preparation of derivative works thereof without the
expressed written permission of the design team is
entirely prohibited.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
CIVIL ENGINEER
MEP ENGINEER
CODE & LIFE SAFETY
A 2.01
BAPS MINNEAPOLIS
MANDIR
Medina, MN
205010
SD PHASE
ELEVATIONS
1/16" = 1'-0"1 WEST ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'-0"2 NORTH ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'-0"3 EAST ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'-0"4 SOUTH ELEVATION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Erin Barnhart, Finance Director
DATE: November 10, 2022
SUBJECT: Accounting Technician Recruitment
Background
The Finance Department is requesting to move forward with advertising and recruitment to fill
the full-time Accounting Technician position to start in 2023. This position is approved as part
of the preliminary 2023 budget.
This was a full-time staffed position until 2014 and since then the department has been
maintained by two full-time employees and the assistance of a part-time administrative assistant.
The Finance Department strives to deliver a high level of service to the residents of Medina and
manage the City’s finances in accordance with laws, regulations, and state statutes.
Medina’s growth and development has contributed significantly to the daily tasks and financial
management associated with building development, parks and recreation, land use project
management, utilities customer service and account management. Since 2015, 575 new utility
accounts have been added and with planned developments in Medina we estimate adding another
168 over the next year. Also planned in 2023, is the replacement of 1,200 meters that will
require individual account updates. Filling this position will allow for further segregation of
duties, cross-training/backup and allow for current workloads to be better distributed.
The job description is included. This position is a pay grade 3 with starting hourly wage of
$26.82-$30.81/hour DOQ, while the range ultimately extends to $34.67. The actual wage will be
based on the top candidates’ skills, knowledge, and abilities.
Staff Recommendation
Motion to authorize staff to begin recruitment for the Accounting Technician position for 2023 hire.
Attachment
• Accounting Technician Job Description, Approved 7/1/2014
Agenda Item #9F
City of Medina Position Description
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
City Council Approved 7.01.2014
Position Title: Accounting Technician
Department: Administration/Finance
Supervisor’s Title: Finance Director
Pay Grade: Step 3
FLSA Status: NON-EXEMPT
Work Status: Full-time
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF POSITION
Performs all phases of accounts payable and accounts receivable functions to process vendor and customer
records for preparing and issuing payments and invoices, and reporting on vendors and customers in
accordance with City policies. Assist in maintaining accounting records in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles as well as with established regulations, policies and procedures. To ensure
accurate and timely processing of water, sewer, and storm water billing systems to accomplish execution of
meter reading and billing of utility charges and to ensure proper responses to customer inquiries in accordance
with established ordinances, resolutions, policies, and procedures.
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS OF POSITION
Accounts Payable
Maintains current listing of vendor files including W-9 disclosure information.
Maintains and monitors electronic vendor transactions.
Examines invoices for proper departmental authorization, sales tax liability and contractual
obligations.
Applies bill payment processes in accordance with city and state statute purchasing and payment
requirements.
Reviews and provides departmental coding of payables to departmental budgets.
Resolves discrepancies concerning billing amounts with vendors.
Accurately enters invoice information to automated system and prepares disbursements.
Prepares journal entries for corrections as needed.
Issues manual and voided checks as required.
Provides accurate reporting of accounts payable cash activity.
Reports the State Unclaimed Property Data.
Prepares and distributes annual 1099 statements to vendors and file corresponding report to
Internal Revenues Service.
Prepares accounts payable and prepaid expense reconciliations and accruals.
Utility Billing
Coordinates and collects meter reading data with Public Works.
Prepares and executes billing cycle on a monthly basis.
Obtains and prepares data for final billings and adjustments.
Identifies inaccurate utility accounts and unusual variances from normal usage.
Prepares and posts accurate penalty amounts.
Answers questions and provides resolution for customers.
Prepares data for other suppliers of purchased water.
Receives payments for utility bills. Records returned payment transactions.
Provides usage data to Public Works department.
Ensures accurate charging of sales taxes and other collectable fees to other entities.
Performs monthly and annual reconciliations with accruals.
Prepares annual certifications and accruals.
Maintains rate structure per council and obtains rate changes of other water and sewer providers.
Accounts Receivable
City of Medina Position Description
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
City Council Approved 7.01.2014
Prepares invoices in a timely and accurate manner.
Maintains false alarm response fee listing.
Monitors land use application reimbursable accounts.
Responds to questions from customers and resolves issues.
Performs timely collection of delinquent invoices including certifications.
Performs monthly and annual reconciliations with accruals.
OTHER DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Assists Finance staff with financial activities and analyzes fund activity to ensure accurateness.
Provides backup for other Finance staff.
Identifies and resolves software application issues with vendor and performs systematic backups.
Develops and maintains record retention procedures in accordance with governmental retention
policies and other legal regulations.
Assists with reception duties.
Performs verbal and written communication and public contact activities.
Monitors/tracks transactions for the Hamel Community Building and recreational rentals and
handles security deposit reimbursements.
Operates office equipment to perform copying, binding, mailing, emailing and other office skills.
Quality of services performed meets required standards for neatness, accuracy, and completeness.
Ability to work under pressure and meet required deadlines and schedules.
Anticipates work needs and prepares in advance.
Maintains a pleasant, tactful and courteous manner in dealing with both the public and City staff.
Provides good working habits and a willingness to cooperate with others and contribute in a
positive way to a pleasant working climate.
Performs other duties as delegated by supervisor or apparent.
HIRING AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS WILL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING
KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND ABILITIES:
Knowledge of bookkeeping terminology, methods, procedures and equipment.
Ability to understand and follow oral and written directions.
Ability to perform mathematical computations with speed and accuracy.
Establish and maintain effective working relationships with associates and the general public.
Knowledge of, and skill in, the correct use of English in business writing.
Knowledge of guidelines and practices related to records retention.
Knowledge of data privacy and open meetings law requirements.
Skill to communicate with a variety of individuals and handle a variety of customer service
situations.
Ability to work independently and plan, organize and prioritize work tasks.
Ability to prepare work results with completeness and accuracy.
Ability to handle multiple ongoing tasks and complete work in a timely manner.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
Two year degree in accounting or related field and two years of related work experience.
Excellent 10-key, keyboard and computer skills.
Ability to use judgment to recognize, trace and correct errors in accounting entries.
DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS
Four year degree in accounting or related field.
Two-years of accounting experience in a local government setting.
Experience in working with municipal database programs, including Banyon Data Systems
(BDS).
WORKING CONDITIONS
City of Medina Position Description
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
City Council Approved 7.01.2014
Most work is performed indoor at city hall. The exception is trips to training, local bank, and other City
property. Generally, the position requires light lifting, usually less than 10 pounds, with up to 50 pounds
on occasion. Aside from cleansers for cleaning office workspace, no hazardous materials or chemicals are
used on this job.
1
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director
Erin Barnhart, Finance Director
DATE: November 30, 2022
MEETING: December 06, 2022
SUBJECT: Water/Sewer Ordinance Amendment
Staff recommends the Section 710.71 Access to Buildings ordinance update to mitigate
issues we’ve encountered with meter replacements. The proposed change is on page 21
of the attached ordinance.
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item #9G
Ordinance No. 581 1
December 6, 2022
CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO. 581
An Ordinance Amending Sections of Chapter 7 of the Code of Ordinances
Regarding Public and Private Utilities
The City Council of the City of Medina ordains as follows:
SECTION I: Medina Code Section 700 is amended by deleting the stricken material and adding
the double-underlined material as follows:
Section 700.01. Sewer Code Defined. Sections 700.01 through 710.47 inclusive, shall comprise
and be referred to hereinafter as the Sewer Code.
Section 700.03. Definitions. Unless the context specifically indicates otherwise, the meaning of
terms in the Sewer Code shall be as follows:
Subd. 1. Sewage Work shall mean all facilities for collecting, pumping, treating and
disposing of sewage.
Subd. 2. Sewage shall mean a combination of the water-carried wastes from residences,
business buildings, institutions, and industrial establishments.
Subd. 3. Sewer shall mean a pipe or conduit for carrying sewage.
Subd. 4. Public Sewer shall mean a sewer in which all owners of abutting properties
have equal rights and is controlled by public authority.
Subd. 5. Sanitary Sewer shall mean a sewer which carries sewage and to which storm,
surface, and ground waters are not intentionally admitted.
Subd. 6. Storm Sewer or Storm Drain shall mean a sewer which carries storm and
surface waters and drainage, but excludes sewage and polluted industrial wastes.
Subd. 7. Sewer Treatment Plant shall mean any arrangement of devices and structures
used for treating sewage.
Subd. 8. Industrial Wastes shall mean the liquid wastes from industrial processes as
distinct from sanitary sewage.
Subd. 9. Garbage shall mean solid wastes from the preparation, cooking and dispensing
of food, and from the handling, storage, and sale of produce.
Subd. 10. Properly Shredded Garbage shall mean the wastes from the preparation,
cooking, and dispensing of food that has been shredded to such degree that all particles
Ordinance No. 581 2
December 6, 2022
will be carried freely under the flow conditions normally prevailing in public sewers,
with no particle greater than 1/2 inch in any dimension.
Subd. 11. Building Drain shall mean that part of the lowest horizontal piping of a
drainage system which receives the discharge from soil, waste, and other drainage pipes
inside the walls of the building and conveys it to the building sewer, beginning 5 feet
outside the inner face of the building wall.
Subd. 12. Building Sewer shall mean the extension from the building drain to the public
sewer or other place of disposal.
Subd. 13. Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (CBOD5) shall mean the
quantity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic matter present in
wastewater as measured according to the latest edition of Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater prepared and published jointly by the American
Public Health Association, the American Water Works Association, and the Water
Environment Federation.
Subd. 14. Ph shall mean the logarithm of the weight of hydrogen ions in grams per liter
of solution.
Subd. 15. Suspended Solids shall mean solids that either float on the surface of, or are
in suspension in water, sewage, or other liquids; and which are removable by laboratory
filtering.
Subd. 16. Natural Outlet shall mean any outlet into a watercourse, pond, ditch, lake or
other body of surface or ground water.
Subd. 17. Watercourse shall mean a channel in which a flow of water occurs, either
continuously or intermittently.
Subd. 18. Person shall mean any individual, firm, company, association, society,
corporation or group.
Subd. 19. Shall is mandatory; May is permissive.
Subd. 20. Plumber means that all references to plumber within this ordinance, unless
otherwise stated within the context of this ordinance, shall mean a Master Plumber, who
shall be licensed and bonded as described in Chapter 326 of Minnesota Statutes.
Subd. 21. City shall mean the City Council or any authorized agents or representatives
of the City, including employees of the City acting within the scope of their employment.
Section 700.05. Protection from Damage. No unauthorized person shall maliciously, willfully,
or negligently break, damage, destroy, uncover, deface or tamper with any structure,
appurtenance, or equipment which is a part of the municipal sewage works. Any person violating
this provision shall be subject to the penalty provided by this code.
Ordinance No. 581 3
December 6, 2022
Section 700.07. Powers of Inspection. The City Engineer and other duly authorized employees
of the City bearing proper credentials and identification shall be permitted to enter upon all
properties for the purposes of inspection, observation, measurement, sampling, and testing, in
accordance with the provisions of the Sewer Code.
Section 700.09. Loss to City. Any person violating any of the provisions of the Sewer Code
shall become liable to the City for any expense, loss, or damage occasioned the City by reason of
such violation.
Section 700.11. Use of Public Sewers Required. It shall be unlawful for any person to place,
deposit, or permit to be deposited in an unsanitary manner upon public or private property within
the City of Medina, or in any area under the jurisdiction of said City, any human or animal
excrement, garbage, or other objectionable waste.
Section 700.13. Sewage Treatment. It shall be unlawful to discharge into any natural outlet
within the City of Medina, or in any area under the jurisdiction of said City, any sanitary sewage,
industrial wastes, or other polluted waters, except where suitable treatment has been provided in
accordance with provisions of the Sewer Code.
Section 700.15. Use of Public Sewer Required. Except as hereinafter provided, it shall be
unlawful to construct or maintain any privy, privy vault, septic tank, cesspool, or other facility
intended or used for the disposal of sewage.
Section 700.17. Toilet Facilities. The owner of all houses, buildings, or properties used for
human occupancy, employment, recreation, or other purpose, situated within the City and
abutting on any street, alley or right-of-way in which there is now located, or may in the future
be located, a public sanitary sewer of the City, is hereby required at the owner's expense to install
suitable toilet facilities therein, and to connect such facilities directly with the proper public
sewer in accordance with the provisions of the Sewer Code, within 90 days after date of official
notice to do so, provided that said public sewer is located in the street or alley of abutting
property.
Section 700.19. Discontinue Septic Tanks and Cesspools. The owner of all houses, buildings
or properties where cesspools and septic tanks have been in existence prior to the construction of
the sanitary sewer, shall connect with the public sewer within 90 days of official notice to do so.
In the event that a hardship exists with respect to fulfilling the requirements contained in this
section, it is required that the owner submit a written request for a time extension to the City
Council and await its determination and decision as to whether a hardship does exist and whether
an extension of time shall be granted. No septic tank or cesspool shall be permitted to discharge
into any public sewer or natural outlet.
Section 700.21. Draining Private Systems. The contents of septic tanks cannot be pumped
into the public sewer system or in any manner emptied into said public sewer system.
Section 700.23. Filling. Filling of any cesspool, septic tank or similar tanks shall not
commence until permission has been granted by the Building Inspector. All discontinued
cesspools and septic tanks shall be filled with soil.
Ordinance No. 581 4
December 6, 2022
Section 700.25. Private Systems. Where a public sanitary sewer is not available, the building
sewer shall be connected to a private sewage disposal system complying with the provisions of
the Individual Sewage Treatment Code.
Section 700.27. Permits Required for Public Sewer Connections. No unauthorized person
shall uncover, make any connections with or opening into, use, alter, or disturb any public sewer
or appurtenance thereof without first obtaining a written permit from the Building Inspector and
otherwise complying with the terms of this chapter.
Section 700.29. Supervision. No plumbing shall be done except under direct supervision of a
Master Plumber when said plumbing is connected with a public sewer.
Section 700.31. Bonds. Permits for building sewers and connections shall be taken out by a
Master Plumber, who shall be licensed and bonded as described in Chapter 326 of Minnesota
Statutes.
Section 700.33. Insurance. Prior to the commencement of construction work such Master
Plumber shall maintain insurance as described in Chapter 326 of Minnesota Statutes. Should the
insurance coverage hereinbefore provided be inadequate in amount then such Master Plumber
shall himself indemnify and save harmless the City and all of its officers and employees.
Section 700.35. Permits. The owner or agent shall make application for a permit on a form
furnished by the City. The permit application shall be supplemented by any plans, specifications,
or other information which the City Engineer may reasonably require. The applicant shall certify
whether the building sewer will carry residential, commercial or industrial wastes.
Section 700.37. Fees. A permit and inspection fee for a sewer permit shall be paid to the City
of Medina at the time the application is filed, in an amount determined by the City fee schedule.
Section 700.39. Permit Card. The City shall furnish a Permit Card with a permit number
which shall be prominently displayed on property where sewer connection is being made; said
card shall be displayed for the duration of the work.
Section 700.41. Owner to Pay Expense. All costs and expense incidental to the installation
and connection of the building sewer shall be borne by the owner. The owner shall indemnify the
City from any loss or damage that may directly or indirectly be occasioned by the installation of
the building sewer.
Section 700.43. Separate Sewers. A separate and independent building sewer shall be
provided for every building.
Section 700.45. Old Sewers. Where any pipe or material other than Schedule 40 Polyvinyl
Chloride (“PVC”) or Ductile Iron Pipe (“DIP”) is encountered in the existing building drain or
building sewer, it shall be replaced with pipe meeting the requirements of city engineering
specifications and/or the state building code.
Ordinance No. 581 5
December 6, 2022
Section 700.47. Crossing Cesspools and Septic Tanks. Building sewer pipe may be laid
across existing cesspools and septic tanks providing pipe rests on a steel reinforced concrete slab,
which ends rest directly on the concrete block walls. The two center sections of a regular
cesspool cover laid parallel with each other may be used.
Section 700.49. Elevation. Whenever possible the building sewer shall be brought to the
building at an elevation below the basement floor. No building sewer shall be laid parallel to or
within three feet of any bearing wall, which might thereby be weakened. The depth shall be
sufficient to afford protection from frost. The building sewer shall be laid at uniform grade and
in straight alignment insofar as possible.
Section 700.51. Lifts. In all buildings in which any building drain is too low to permit gravity
flow to the public sewer, sanitary sewage carried by such drain shall be lifted by approved
artificial means and discharged from the building.
Section 700.53. Excavations. All excavating required for the installation of a building sewer
shall be open trench work unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Pipe laying and
backfill shall be performed in accordance with rules and regulations of the City of Medina. No
backfill shall be placed until the work has been inspected and approved. Tunneling may be
permitted but no tunnel shall exceed six (6) feet in length and the pipe shall be installed so as to
permit inspection of all joints.
Section 700.55. Sewer Service Pipe. All sewer service pipes shall be schedule 40 PVC or DIP
and must be installed according to city engineering specifications and/or the state building code.
Section 700.57. Joints. All joints and connections shall be made gas-tight and water-tight.
Section 700.59. Permit Required. No person shall in any way open or cut a public street to
connect to a "Y" branch without first acquiring a written permit from the City of Medina.
Section 700.61. Connections, Where Sewers Provided. Sewer service leads have been
provided for each separate structure and all connections to the public sanitary sewer shall be
made where sewer service leads have been installed. Connection with the public sanitary sewer
at any other location must be approved by the City Engineer prior to starting of any construction.
In the event the sewer service leads which have been installed cannot be used, then the property
owner shall pay the full cost of making the connection elsewhere.
Section 700.63. Inspection. The applicant for the building sewer permit shall notify the City
when the building sewer is ready for inspection and connection to the public sewer. The
connection shall be made under the supervision of the City or its representative.
Section 700.65. Guards, etc. All excavations for building sewer installation shall be adequately
guarded with barricades and lights so as to protect the public from hazard. Streets, sidewalks,
parkways and other public property disturbed in the course of the work shall be restored in a
manner satisfactory to the City, at the applicant’s expense.
Ordinance No. 581 6
December 6, 2022
SECTION II: Medina Code Section 701 is amended by deleting the stricken material and
adding the double-underlined material as follows:
Section 701.01. Use of Public Sewers; Surface Waters. No person shall discharge or cause to
be discharged any storm water, surface water, ground water, roof runoff, subsurface drainage
including water from a sump pump, cooling water or unpolluted industrial process waters to any
sanitary sewer. Discharge of water from a sump pump shall be accomplished in a manner
consistent with regulations adopted by the City Council.
Section 701.03. Storm Sewers. Storm water and all other unpolluted drainage shall be
discharged to such sewers as are specifically designed as storm sewers, or to a natural outlet
approved by the City Council. Industrial cooling water or unpolluted process waters may be
discharged, upon approval of the City Council, to a storm sewer, or natural outlet.
Section 701.05. Prohibited Wastes. Except as hereinafter provided, no person shall discharge
or cause to be discharged any material which may adversely affect the public sewer system,
including, but not limited to, the following described waters or wastes to any public sewer:
Subd. 1. Any liquid or vapor having a temperature higher than 150 degrees F.
Subd. 2. Any water or waste which may contain more than 100 parts per million, by
weight, of fat, oil, or grease.
Subd. 3. Any gasoline, benzene, naphtha, fuel oil, or other flammable or explosive
liquid, solid or gas.
Subd. 4. Any garbage that has not been properly shredded.
Subd. 5. Any ashes, cinders, sand, mud, straw, shavings, metal, glass, rags, feathers, tar,
plastics, wood, paunch manure, or any other solid or viscous substance capable of
causing obstruction to the flow in sewers or other interference with the proper operation
of the sewage works.
Subd. 6. Any waters or wastes having a Ph lower than 5.5 or higher than 9.0 or having
any other corrosive property capable of causing damage or hazard to structures,
equipment, and personnel of the sewage works.
Subd. 7. Any waters or wastes containing a toxic or poisonous substance in sufficient
quantity to injure or interfere with any sewage treatment process, constitute a hazard to
humans or animals or create any hazard in the receiving waters of the sewage treatment
plant.
Subd. 8. Any waters or wastes containing suspended solids of such character and
quantity that unusual attention or expense is required to handle such materials at the
sewage treatment plant.
Ordinance No. 581 7
December 6, 2022
Subd. 9. Any noxious or malodorous gas or substance capable of creating a public
nuisance.
Section 701.07. Grease, etc.
Subd. 1. Grease, oil, and sand interceptors shall be provided when they are necessary for
the proper handling of liquid wastes containing grease in excessive amounts or any
flammable wastes, sand, and other harmful ingredients; except that such interceptors shall
not be required for private living quarters or dwelling units. All such interceptors shall be
of a type and capacity approved by the City Engineer, and shall be located as to be
readily and easily accessible for cleaning and inspection.
Subd. 2. Construction. Grease and oil interceptors shall be constructed of impervious
materials capable of withstanding abrupt and extreme changes in temperature. They shall
be of substantial construction, watertight, and equipped with easily removable covers
which, when bolted in place, shall be gas-tight and watertight.
Subd. 3. Where installed, all grease, oil and sand interceptors shall be maintained by the
owner, at his expense, in continuously efficient operation at all times.
Section 701.09. Restricted Wastes. The City Engineer may restrict, condition or prohibit the
admission into the public sewers of any waters or wastes:
Subd. 1. having CBOD5 greater than 200 milligrams per liter (mg/l), and/or
Subd. 2. containing more than 250 mg/l of total suspended solids, and/or
Subd. 3. containing any quantity of substances having the characteristics described in
Section 701.05, and/or
Subd. 4. having an average daily flow greater than 2% of the average daily sewage flow
of the City.
Section 701.11. Reduction of Waste.
Subd. 1. The owner shall provide at his expense, such preliminary treatment as may be
necessary to,
(a) reduce the CBOD5 to 200 milligrams per liter (mg/l), and the total suspended solids
to 250 mg/l, and/or
(b) reduce objectionable characteristics or constituents to within the maximum limits
provided for in Section 701.05, or (c) control the quantities and rates of discharge of such
waters or wastes.
Subd. 2. Submission to MWCC. Plans, specifications, and any other pertinent
information relating to proposed preliminary treatment facilities shall be submitted for
the approval of the City Engineer and of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission,
Ordinance No. 581 8
December 6, 2022
and no construction of such facilities shall be commenced until said approvals are
obtained in writing.
Section 701.13. Preliminary Treatment. Where preliminary treatment facilities are provided
for any waters or wastes, they shall be maintained continuously in satisfactory and effective
operation, by the owner at their expense.
Section 701.15. Manholes. The owner of any property served by a building sewer carrying
industrial wastes shall install a suitable control manhole in the building sewer to facilitate
observation, sampling and measurement of the wastes. Such manhole, when required, shall be
accessibly and safely located, and shall be constructed in accordance with plans approved by the
City Engineer. The manhole shall be installed by the owner at their expense, and shall be
maintained by the owner so as to be safe and accessible at all times.
Section 701.17. Tests. All measurements tests and analyses of the characteristics of waters and
wastes to which reference is made in Sections 701.09 and 701.11 shall be determined in
accordance with methods employed by the Minnesota Department of Health, and shall be
determined at the control manhole provided for in Section 858 or upon suitable samples taken at
said control manhole. In the event that no special manhole has been required, the control
manhole shall be considered to be the nearest downstream manhole in the public sewer to the
point at which the building sewer is connected.
Section 701.19. Agreement with City. No statement contained in this chapter shall be
construed as preventing any special agreement or arrangement between the City and any
industrial concern whereby an industrial waste of unusual strength or character may be accepted
by the City for treatment, subject to and in exchange for, payment therefor by the industrial
concern.
Section 701.21. Industrial User Strength Charge. The Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission, a metropolitan commission organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Minnesota (the "Commission"), in order to receive and retain grants in compliance with the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 and regulations thereunder (the
"Act"), has determined to impose an industrial user sewer strength charge upon users of the
Metropolitan Disposal System (as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.121, subdivision
24) to recover operation and maintenance costs of treatment works attributable to the strength of
the discharge of industrial waste, such sewer strength charge being in addition to the charge
based upon the volume of discharge. In order for the City to pay such costs based upon strength
of industrial discharge and allocated to it each year by the Commission, it is hereby found,
determined and declared to be necessary to establish sewer strength charges and a formula for
the computation thereof for all industrial users receiving waste treatment services within or
served by the City. Furthermore, Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075, Subdivision 3, empowers
the City to make such sewer charge a charge against the owner, lessee, occupant or all of them
and certify unpaid charges to the County Auditor as a tax lien against the property served.
Section 701.23. Establishment of Strength Charges. For the purpose of paying the costs
allocated to the City each year by the Commission that are based upon the strength of discharge
of all industrial users receiving waste treatment services within or served by the City, there is
Ordinance No. 581 9
December 6, 2022
hereby approved, adopted and established, in addition to the sewer charge based upon the
volume of discharge, a sewer charge upon each person, company or corporation receiving waste
treatment services within or served by the City, based upon strength of industrial waste
discharged into the sewer system of the City (the "Strength Charge").
Section 701.25. Establishment of Strength Charge Formula. For the purpose of computation
of the Strength Charge established by Section 701.23 hereof, there is hereby established,
approved and adopted in compliance with the Act, the same strength charge formula designated
in Resolution No. 76-172, adopted by the governing body of the Commission on June 15, 1976,
such formula being based upon pollution qualities and difficulty of disposal of the sewage
produced through an evaluation of pollution qualities and quantities in excess of an annual
average base and the proportionate costs of operation and maintenance of waste treatment
services provided by the Commission.
Section 701.27. Strength Charge Payment. It is hereby approved, adopted and established
that the Strength Charge established by Section 701.23 hereof shall be paid by each industrial
user receiving waste treatment services and subject thereto before the twentieth (20th) day
succeeding the date of billing thereof to such user by or on behalf of the City, and such payment
thereof shall be deemed to be delinquent if not so paid to the billing entity before such date.
Furthermore, it is hereby established, approved and adopted that if such payment is not paid
before such date, an industrial user shall pay interest compounded monthly at the rate of two-
thirds of one percent (2/3%) per month on the unpaid balance due.
Section 701.29. Establishment of Tax Lien. As provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section
444.075, Subdivision 3, it is hereby approved, adopted and established that if payment of the
Strength Charge established by Section 701.23 hereof is not paid before the sixtieth (60th) day
next succeeding the date of billing thereof to the industrial user by or on behalf of the City, said
delinquent sewer Strength Charge, plus accrued interest established pursuant to Section 701.25
hereof, shall be deemed to be a charge against the owner, lessee and occupant of the property
served, and the City or its agent shall certify such unpaid delinquent balance to the County
Auditor with taxes against the property served for collection as other taxes are collected;
provided, however, that such certification shall not preclude the City or its agent from recovery
of such delinquent sewer Strength Charge and interest thereon under any other available remedy.
Section 701.31. Definition Governing Rules and Rates for Sewer Charge. Unless the
language clearly indicates that a different meaning is intended, the following terms and phrases
shall be given the meaning set out below for the purposes of this ordinance:
Subd. 1. Normal Sewage is water-carried waste products from residences, public
buildings, business or industrial establishments, schools, or any other buildings or
structures, including the excrement or other discharge from human beings or animals,
together with such ground water infiltration as may be present.
Subd. 2. Industrial Waste is any liquid, gaseous or solid waste substance resulting from
any process of industry, manufacturing, trade, or business, as well as the development of
any natural resource or any similar activity.
Ordinance No. 581 10
December 6, 2022
Subd. 3. Average Unit is defined as a building containing three people.
Section 701.33. Rates.
Subd. 1. The following rates and charges for use and service of the sanitary sewer
system are hereby established, such charges and rates to be made against each lot, parcel
of land, unit or premises which may have a connection directly or indirectly into the City
sanitary sewer system and which discharges only normal sewage into such system.
Subd. 2. Minimum Charges. The minimum monthly charge, whether use of water is
metered or not, shall be set by Resolution of the City Council.
Subd. 3. Flat Charges. Where the rate is not based upon the metered use of water,
monthly flat charges shall be set by Resolution of the City Council.
Subd. 4. Extraordinary Charges. Notwithstanding any other provision of this ordinance
to the contrary, the rate for discharge of water from any extraordinary source into the
sanitary sewer system shall be established by Resolution of the City Council.
Subd. 5. Metered Flow Charges. For all residential premises where the rate is to be
based on the metered flow of water, the rate shall be set by Resolution of the City
Council.
Subd. 6. Rate-Industrial Waste and Large Units. On each lot, parcel, premises, or unit
not enumerated herein, the use of water shall be metered and the rate shall be the same as
that provided in the City Council rate Resolution.
Section 701.35. Metering Water Supply in Lieu of Flat Charge. A meter recording the use of
water may be installed on any non-residential lot, parcel, premises or unit enumerated in this
ordinance and thereafter the rate shall be based upon such use of water. The City Council, may
by resolution, require and order the installation of such meter on any such lot, parcel, premises or
unit or class thereof where it shall determine that the aforementioned flat charges are impractical
to apply, or result in inequitable charges because insufficient or excessive; and thereafter the rate
shall be based upon such use of water.
Section 701.37. Installation of Meter. Any water meter installed for use or used as a basis for
the computation of sewer rates shall be installed and maintained in good operating condition at
all times. The City shall purchase the water meter, external unit and attachment horn on behalf of
the owner, but the owner shall reimburse the City for the cost of the water meter, external unit
and attachment horn upon receipt of the water meter, external unit and attachment horn. The City
shall at its own cost maintain the water meter, external unit and attachment horn, provided,
however, that if there is tampering with the water meter, external unit and attachment horn, then
the owner shall be charged with the cost of maintaining the water meter, external unit and
attachment horn. Ordinary wear and tear of the water meter, external unit and attachment horn
shall not constitute tampering by the owner. Installation of and maintenance of such meter shall
be made in accordance with the plumbing regulations of this City.
Ordinance No. 581 11
December 6, 2022
Section 701.39. Water Used Not Entering Sewer Systems. If the lot, parcel of land, or
premises discharges normal sewage or industrial waste into the sanitary sewage system, either
directly or indirectly, and it can be shown to the satisfaction of the City Council that a portion of
the water measured by the water meter does not and cannot enter the sanitary sewage system,
then, and in that event, the City Council may permit or require the installation of other or
additional meters in such a manner that the quantity of water which actually could enter the
sewer system may be determined. In such case the charges or rates shall be based upon the
amount of water which can enter the sanitary sewage system.
Section 701.41. Supplying Information. The owner, occupant or person in charge of any
premises shall supply the City with such information as the City may reasonably require related
to use of water, use of sewer, or sewer rates. Willful failure to provide such information or
willful falsification of such information shall constitute a violation of this ordinance, as shall
willful failure to comply with any requirement or order issued pursuant to this ordinance.
Section 701.43. Estimated Bills. If the owner, occupant or person in charge of any premises
shall fail or refuse to provide information as provided in Section 701.41 hereof, or shall fail or
refuse to comply with any requirement of this ordinance, the proper charge for such premises
shall be estimated and billed in accordance with such estimate.
Section 701.45. Beginning Service. For a fraction of a month the charges and rates for
nonmetered units shall be based upon the amount of the established flat charge, provided,
however, that the actual day of beginning shall be considered as having begun on the first or the
fifteenth of the month, whichever is closer.
Section 701.47.
Subd. 1. The City Council may by resolution adjust any of the charges set forth in this
ordinance upon recommendation of the City Engineer or other employees of the City, based
upon the actual costs to the City, of the service and facilities being provided.
Subd. 2. The provisions of the preceding subdivision notwithstanding, the City Council may by
resolution adjust the charges made hereunder to any person, firm or corporation, upon
recommendation of the City Engineer or other employees of the City, based upon the degree or
extent of treatment required before such sewage is introduced into the Municipal Sewer System.
SECTION III: Medina Code Section 710 is amended by deleting the stricken material and
adding the double-underlined material as follows:
Section 710.01. Definitions. For the purposes of this section, the following terms shall have the
meanings given to them:
Subd. 1. “Backflow Preventer” means any mechanical or air gap system designed and
installed in order to prevent the accidental backflow of water from one source to another.
Ordinance No. 581 12
December 6, 2022
Subd 2. “City Water Supply System” means all Public Water Supply Wells, water
towers, reservoirs, treatment plants, water mains, and service lines that the city City
owns, operates or maintains and all private water lines connected to any of the above.
Subd. 3. “Drinking Water Supply Management Area” means the surface and subsurface
area surrounding a Public Water Supply Well, including the Wellhead Protection Area,
which must be managed in accordance with the Wellhead Protection Plan.
Subd. 4. “Irrigation Well” means any well that is installed to provide water to
supplement the water level of a Storm Water Pond which is utilized for a Lawn and
Landscape Irrigation System.
Subd. 5. “Lawn and Landscape Irrigation System” means all pumps, lines or sprinkler
heads which are located on private property or within the adjacent public right-of-way
that have a sole purpose of irrigating landscape plants and/or grass.
Subd. 6. “Private Water Supply Well” means a Water Supply Well that is not owned,
operated or managed by the City.
Subd. 7. “Public Water Supply Well” means a Water Supply Well owned, managed or
operated by the City.
Subd. 8. “Seed Bed Preparation” means the preparation of top soil for any seeding,
sodding or planting. A seed bed shall consist of a minimum of four inches of black top
soil and two inches of humus or compost material.
Subd. 9. “Storm Water Pond” means any basin that is designed and constructed to treat
storm water runoff from a particular area.
Subd. 10. “Water Supply Well” means a well that is not a dewatering well or monitoring
well and includes wells used:
(a) for potable water supply;
(b) for irrigation;
(c) for agriculture, commercial or industrial water supply;
(d) for heating or cooling;
(e) as a remedial well; and
(f) for testing water yield for irrigation, commercial or industrial uses, residential
supply or public water supply.
Subd. 11. “Wellhead Protection Area” means the surface and subsurface area
surrounding a Public Water Supply Well as identified in the Well Protection Plan.
Ordinance No. 581 13
December 6, 2022
Subd. 12. “Wellhead Protection Plan” means the City plan, which has been approved by
the Minnesota Department of Health, which provides for the protection of all Public
Water Supply Wells.
Section 710.02. Private Water Supply Wells where City Water Supply System is Available.
Subd. 1. Purpose. The City Water Supply System represents a significant public
investment and its operation in an efficient and sanitary manner is essential to protect
public health, safety and welfare, to safeguard municipal finances and to support
development within the community. It is the purpose of this ordinance to protect the
integrity, financial stability, and adequacy of the City Water Supply System by restricting
the installation of Private Water Supply Wells where the City Water Supply System is
available and regulating the permitting of Private Water Supply Wells in locations where
they pose a threat to City Water Supply Wells.
Subd. 2. Private Water Supply Wells Prohibited where City Water Supply System is
Available.
(a) No Private Water Supply Well may be installed on any property where the
City Water Supply System is available with the exception of the wells
described in Subd. 2(b) of Section 710.02 below. For the purpose of this
section, the City Water Supply System shall be considered available if the
property is within the current or earlier time period of the Urban Services
Phasing Plan of the City of Medina Comprehensive Plan.
(b) Exceptions.
(1) Irrigation Wells. Irrigation Wells may be installed to supplement water in
storm water ponds which supply a Lawn and Landscape Irrigation System.
Such Wells shall require prior written approval of the City. No Irrigation
Well shall be permitted by the City within the Drinking Water Supply
Management Area unless the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of
the City that the Irrigation Well will not have a negative effect on a City
Water Supply Well, impact the City’s ability to provide an adequate public
water supply or otherwise compromise the City Water Supply System.
(2) Private Water Supply Wells used solely as part of a heating or cooling
system for a building.
(3) Private Water Supply Wells on property zoned Rural Residential-Urban
Reserve (RR-UR), Rural Business Holding (RBH), or Rural Commercial
Holding (RCH) if the City determines that connecting to the City Water
Supply System is not economically feasible based on the use proposed on the
property.
Ordinance No. 581 14
December 6, 2022
Section 710.03. Connections with Water Mains Prohibited. No person, except employed or
authorized by the City, shall tap any distributing main or pipe of the City Water Supply System,
or insert stop-cocks or corporation-cocks therein.
Section 710.04. Permits for Service Connections.
Subd. 1. No connection or service tapping shall be made with a City water main without
a permit which shall be issued by the City upon application by a licensed Master
Plumber.
Subd. 2. No permit shall be issued for a connection or service tapping with the City water
main to anyone except a licensed Master Plumber.
Subd. 3. Permits shall describe the location and size of each connection, and size must
not be departed from in any degree, except on the written consent made on said permit by
the officer giving the same.
Section 710.05. Supervision. No plumbing shall be done except under direct supervision of a
Master Plumber when connecting with a public water system.
Section 710.07. Bonds and Insurance. Permits for building water systems and connections
shall be taken out by a Master Plumber, who shall furnish a bond and insurance as required by
Sections 700.31 and 700.33 of this Code.
Section 710.09. Permit Card. The City shall furnish a Permit Card with permit number which
shall be prominently displayed on property where water connection is being made; said card
shall be displayed for the duration of the work.
Section 710.11. Connection Fees. The fee for a permit for water main tapping shall be paid for
each connection in the amount specified by Resolution of the City Council. In addition thereto,
before any permit shall be issued, there shall be paid any sum required under Sections 710.13
and 710.15.
Section 710.13. Payment of Assessments. No permit shall be issued to tap or connect with any
water main of the City of Medina either directly or indirectly from any lot or tract of land unless
the City Administrator-Clerk shall have certified one of the following:
Subd. 1. That such lot or tract of land to be served by such connection or tap has been
assessed for the cost of construction of the water main with which the connection is
made;
Subd. 2. If no assessment has been levied for such construction cost, that proceedings
for levying such assessment have been or will be commenced in due course;
Subd. 3. If no assessment has been levied, and no assessment proceedings will be
completed in due course, that a sum equal to the portion of cost of constructing said water
main which would be assessable against said lot or tract has been paid to the City.
Ordinance No. 581 15
December 6, 2022
Section 710.15. Payment Where No Assessment Has Been Made. If no such certificate can
be issued by the City Administrator-Clerk, no such permit to tap or connect to any water main
shall be issued unless the applicant shall pay an additional connection fee which shall be equal to
the portion of the cost of construction of the said main which would be assessable against said lot
or tract to be served by such tapping or connection. Said assessable cost is to be determined by
the City Engineer and City Assessor upon the same basis per front foot as any assessment
previously levied against other property for the said main, or, if no such assessment has been
levied, upon the basis of the uniform charge per front foot which may have been or which shall
be charged for similar tapping or connection with said main, determined on the basis of the total
assessable cost of said main allocated on a frontage basis.
Section 710.16. Excavation Permits Required. No person shall excavate in a public street to
service a water main, make connection therewith, or for any purpose which will expose a water
main, unless given permit to do so by the City.
Section 710.17. Permit Applications. Application for a permit shall be made in writing and
signed by the owner or his agent duly authorized to do the work. The application must state
clearly the kind of service for which the connection is intended, the size and kind of pipe to be
used, the street and number, which side of street, if on a corner, on which street to be tapped,
with a diagram of the property to be supplied, showing the streets, the boundary, the block on
which it is situated, with the distance from the nearest corner, the full name and address of the
owner, the purpose for which the water is to be used, the time when the corporation-cock is to be
inserted; and the application shall show all other particulars necessary to the full understanding
of the subject. No permit shall authorize anything not stated in the application. For any
misrepresentation in such application the permit may be suspended, and if the misrepresentation
appears to be willful, the permit will be revoked.
Section 710.19. Corporation-Cock and Laying of Service Pipes. The corporation-cock
inserted in the distributing pipe must be of the size specified in the permit order. Every service
pipe must be laid sufficiently waiving to allow of not less than one foot of extra length, and in
such manner as to prevent rupture by settlement. The service pipe must be placed not less than
eight feet below the surface and in all cases so arranged as to prevent rupture from freezing.
Section 710.21. Stop Boxes. Service pipes must extend from the main to the inside of the
building; or if not taken into a building then to the hydrant or other fixtures which it is intended
to supply. A stop-cock accessible from the surface through a sleeve without digging in all cases
must be placed outside in a box at the curb, and a shut-off or other stop-cock with waste, of the
size and strength required, shall be placed close to the inside wall of the building, well protected
from freezing. All stop boxes at the curb must be set in front of the building intended to be
supplied, at the back side of the perimeter drainage and utility easement of said lot. All stop
boxes and cocks must conform to the specifications of the City of Medina.
Section 710.23. Pipe Sizes. The pipe sizes shall be as specified and directed by the City
Engineer for the City of Medina.
Ordinance No. 581 16
December 6, 2022
Section 710.25. Time for Insertion. If from any cause the plumber laying the service pipe
should fail to have the corporation-cock inserted at the time specified in his application, notice
must be given the City fixing another day on which he wishes the corporation-cock to be
inserted. The notice must be given at least two days previous to the excavation for laying of the
service pipe, and the corporation-cock must be inserted before 5 p.m. except in special cases, and
then the work shall be done only upon a written order from the City.
Section 710.27. Turning on Water. No person shall turn on any water supply at the stop box
without a permit from the City Public Works Director, and no such permit shall be given anyone
but a licensed plumber. The City reserves the right to turn off any water supply if said number is
not displayed after a written notice has been sent to the owner as appearing on its books.
Section 710.29. Supply from One Corporation-Cock. No more than one house or building
shall be supplied from one corporation-cock.
Section 710.31. Repair of Leaks. In case of failure upon the part of any consumer or owner to
repair any leak occurring upon her or his service pipe within 24 hours after verbal or written
notice has been given upon the premises, the water will be shut off and will not be turned on
until the leak is repaired. Upon notice to the Building Inspector and verification that the leak has
been repaired, and payment of a fee set by resolution of the City Council, the water will be
turned on.
Section 710.33. Water Meters.
Subd. 1. Domestic Water Meter. Every customer shall provide a place where a meter
can be installed as approved by the City Public Works Director or the City Engineer, and
a licensed plumber shall install and maintain the same. The City fee schedule shall
determine the charge to be made to customers for purchase of a water meter, with size
and type of meter to be determined by the City Public Works Director and/or the City
Engineer. At the time application is made for a building permit for a home to be served
by City water, the applicant shall pay for the meter.
Subd. 2. Irrigation Meter. In order to save on irrigation costs, a customer may apply
for a permit to purchase from the City a one inch irrigation meter, which charge shall be
determined by the City fee schedule.
Subd. 3. Temporary Water Meter. Except for extinguishment of fires or when
authorized by special permit from the City Public Works Director (for temporary
purposes only), no person shall use water from the Water Supply System of the City or
permit water to be drawn therefrom, unless the water used be metered by passing through
a meter and approved backflow preventer and the user pays a hookup fee according to the
City’s fee schedule. No unauthorized person shall connect, disconnect, take apart, or in
any manner change, or cause to be changed, or interfere with any such meter or the action
thereof.
Ordinance No. 581 17
December 6, 2022
Section 710.35. Usage and Testing Fees. If any meter becomes obstructed or out of order, the
City may issue a work order for it to be repaired. If at any time the customer requests to have the
meter tested for accuracy, the same shall be done by the City, with the fee determined by the City
fee schedule and charged to the customer if the meter registers 90% or more accurate. All water
meters shall remain the property of the City and may be replaced at any time by the City, in the
City’s sole discretion.
Section 710.37. Meter Damage Costs. Water meters may be repaired or replaced from time to
time as is necessary to ensure accurate measuring of the flow of water. The cost of said repair or
replacement shall be borne by the City except that whenever a meter has been damaged due to
negligence on the part of persons other than the employees of the City, the owner, occupant, and
user of the premises, or such other person desiring the use of the water, shall reimburse the City
within 60 days and upon demand therefor, the water service and supply to said premises may be
shut off or discontinued as determined to be in the best interest of the City.
Section 710.39. Old Corporation-Cocks Plugged, Penalty. When new buildings are erected
on the sites of old ones, and it is desired to increase or change the old water service, no
connections with the mains shall be given until all the old corporation-cocks shall have been
removed and the main plugged. If any contractor, workman or employee upon such building
shall cause or allow any service pipe to be hammered together at the ends to stop the flow of
water, or save expense in removing such pipe from the main, the owner of such building, such
workman or contractor shall, upon conviction thereof, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall
remove said service pipe from the main; if he shall fail to do so on 24 hours’ notice, he shall be
obligated to pay the City the cost incurred by it for such removal.
Section 710.41. Meter Setting Devices. Meter setting devices for 3/4 inch and one inch meters
shall be of copper pipe or tubing from the terminus of the service pipe up to and including the
house side valve, provided that if copper cannot be obtained such meter setting device may be of
another non-corrodible metal approved by the City.
Section 710.43. Excavation for Tapping Water Mains. Excavations made for the purpose of
making a tap from any City water main shall be at least 2 and 1/2 feet wide by 4 feet long inside
the curbing, said 4 feet to be measured from a point 6 inches beyond the side of the main
opposite to that which is to be tapped and from said point toward the building with which said
water connection is to be made. Such excavations shall extend to the depth of at least 12 inches
lower than the bottom of the water main. Ample clear space shall be allowed around the main in
all cases to insert the tapping machine. All excavations for tapping shall be safely curbed to the
satisfaction of the City tapper. In case the excavation is not properly made, sufficient clear space
is not provided, or the excavation improperly curbed, the tap shall not be made until the
excavation, clear space and curbing are proper and safe. A safe ladder shall be furnished by the
person doing the work for the use of the inspector for the purpose of inspecting the connection to
the City main.
Section 710.45. Water Meter Installation. All water meters hereafter installed shall be in
accordance with the following rules:
Ordinance No. 581 18
December 6, 2022
Subd. 1. The bottom of the meter shall not be less than four (4) inches, or more than
twelve (12) inches from the top of the finished basement floor line; and the meter shall
not be set more than twelve (12) inches measured horizontally, from the inside line of the
basement wall.
Subd. 2. The service pipe from the City water main to the meter, where the same enters
the building, shall be brought through the basement floor in a vertical position, so that a
connection may be made thereto with an ell to which may be attached the stop and waste,
and meter, or the pipe may be brought through the basement floor, in a vertical position
and bent above the floor at a right angle; and the stop and waste, and meter attached in
such a manner that the meter shall stand in a proper, vertical position. In no case shall
there be more than twelve (12) inches of pipe exposed between the point of the entrance
through the basement floor and the stop and waste, and said stop and waste shall be
connected directly to the meter.
Subd. 3. The water pipe connecting with the City water main shall not be run under any
basement floor for a distance of more than two (2) feet, measured from the inside line of
the basement wall, before being connected with the water meter.
Section 710.47. Private Water Supplies. No water pipe of the City Water Supply System shall
be connected with any pump, well or tank that is connected with any other source of water
supply and when such are found, the City shall notify the owner to disconnect the same, and if
not done immediately, the water supply shall be turned off forthwith.
Section 710.48. Cross-connection Control. Cross-connections between potable water systems
and any system or equipment that contain, or are used to handle, water or other substances that
may pose a risk to health or safety are prohibited, except where express written approval has
been made by the City of Medina. Written approval may only be given where suitable protective
devices, such as a break tank or a reduced pressure zone backflow preventer, are installed, tested,
and maintained to ensure proper operation. Cross-connections between an individual water
supply and a potable public supply shall not be made without express written permission from
the City of Medina in accordance with the Minnesota Plumbing Code, Minnesota Rules Chapter
4715.
Section 710.49. Size of Connections. Connections with the mains for ordinary domestic supply
shall be a minimum diameter of one inch.
Section 710.51. Connections Beyond City Boundaries. In any and all cases where water
mains of the City have been or shall be extended to or constructed in any road, street, alley or
public highway adjacent to or outside the corporate limits of the City, the City Public Works
Director is hereby authorized to issue permits to the owners or occupants of properties adjacent
to, or accessible to, such water mains to tap and make proper water service pipe connections with
such water mains of the City in conformity with and subject to all the terms, conditions and
provisions of the ordinances of the City relating to the tapping of the City water mains and
making water service pipe connections therewith, and to furnish and supply water from the
Water Supply System of the City to such owners and occupants of properties adjacent or
accessible to such water mains of the City through and by means of water meters duly installed.
Ordinance No. 581 19
December 6, 2022
Water service rendered to such persons shall be subject to all provisions of this Ordinance, and
persons accepting such service shall thereby agree to be bound and obligated by said Ordinance.
This provision regarding connections beyond the City boundaries shall not be effective until a
contract regarding said connections is entered into by and between the City of Medina and the
City in which said connections are to be made, or a contract is made by and between an owner of
land beyond the City boundaries where a connection is proposed to be made and the City in
which said property is located is made a party to said contract.
Section 710.53. Fire Hydrant Connections. It shall be unlawful for any person, except when
authorized by the City, or except members of the City Public Works Department or Volunteer
Fire Department, when performing their official duties, to open or interfere with any of the
hydrants of the City Water Supply System.
Section 710.55. Water Rates.
Subd. 1. The rate due and payable to the City by each water user within the City for
water taken from the City Water Supply System shall be established in the City fee
schedule.
Subd. 2. In case the meter is found to have stopped or to be operating in a faulty manner,
the amount of water used will be estimated in accordance with the amount used
previously.
Subd. 3. When water is desired for construction purposes, the owner shall make
application for water service and the service shall be carried inside the foundation wall. If
the meter cannot be installed at that time, the charges for the water shall be set forth
under water rates, and when the building is completed, the meter shall be set in the
regular way.
Section 710.57. Service Charges. Charges in an amount set by the City fee schedule shall be
made and collected at the time of making application for the following connections to the Water
System.
Subd. 1. For turning on water where service has been turned off for non-payment of
water bill or failure to repair a leak;
Subd. 2. For raising or lowering, stop-box tops to correspond with ground level change
made by property owner;
Subd. 3. For turning water on or off at the request of the property owner or tenant, or for
any other reason.
Section 710.59. Utility Fund. There shall be maintained within the City accounting system
separate funds, Sanitary Sewer and Water System. All monies collected by the City
Administrator-Clerk for sewer and water service under this Ordinance shall be deposited in each
respective fund. Such fund shall be used to meet all the expenses for the operation, maintenance,
repair, plant expansion, and administration of each respective Sanitary Sewer and Water Project.
Ordinance No. 581 20
December 6, 2022
Section 710.61. Billing Procedures. All bills and notices for sewer and water service shall be
sent to the property address of the real estate being served. Non-resident owners or agents shall
receive a copy of such bills and notices upon written request.
Section 710.63. Collections and Delinquent Bills. Bills shall be delinquent if not paid in full
on or before the last day of the month in which service was provided. A service charge in an
amount set by the City fee schedule shall be incurred immediately upon such delinquency and
shall be added to the next monthly billing. An additional service charge shall be added on each
monthly calculation date upon which said delinquent bill, including any previous service charge,
remains unpaid. All bills, including service charges, which remain delinquent and unpaid on
September 1 of each calendar year, shall be certified by the City Administrator-Clerk to the
County Auditor on or before October 15th of said year for collection. Amounts so certified,
together with interest at the rate set by resolution of the City Council, commencing on the date of
initial delinquency, shall be extended by the County Auditor on the tax rolls and become a lien
upon the property in the manner of special assessments, but shall be payable in a single
installment, and shall be collected with real property taxes and returned to the City of Medina.
Section 710.65. Discontinuance of Service for Ordinance Violations. The City is authorized
to shut off water service at any stop box connection any time it finds any of the following,
provided that water shall not be turned off from any service pipe between the hours of 9a.m. on
Saturday and 9a.m. on the following Monday:
Subd. 1. The owner or occupant of the premises served, or any person working on any
pipes or equipment thereon which are connected with the City water supply system has
intentionally violated any of the requirements of the Ordinances of the City relative to the
water supply system or connections therewith.
Subd. 2. The owner or occupant of the premises served threatens to violate, or cause to
be violated, any of the provisions of this Code.
Subd. 3. Any charge for water, service, meter, meter parts or any other financial
obligations imposed on the present or former owner or occupant of the premises served,
by the provisions of this Code, is unpaid.
Subd. 4. Fraud or misrepresentation by the owner or occupant in connection with an
application for service.
Section 710.67. Deficiency of Water and Shutting Off Water. The City shall not be liable for
any deficiency or failure in the supply of water to consumers, whether occasioned by shutting the
water off for the purpose of making repairs or connections, or from any other cause whatever
whatsoever. In case of fire, or alarm of fire, the City may shut off water to ensure a supply for
firefighting; or in making repairs or constructing new works, the City may shut off the water at
any time and keep it shut off so long as it shall deem necessary.
Section 710.68. Water Use Restriction. In the event of a water supply shortage, use of City
water for lawn and garden sprinkling, irrigation, car washing or other non-potable uses shall be
Ordinance No. 581 21
December 6, 2022
limited to an odd-even date schedule corresponding to property address, effective upon the
Public Works Director or City Administrator’s designee’s determination that the shortage of
water supply threatens the City Water Supply System. The Public Works Director or City
Administrator’s designee may further limit the days and hours of the City Water Supply System
usage at any time as deemed necessary. Special permit allowance will be considered for those
property owners with new seed, sod, or other needs if the Public Works Director determines
sufficient water for such permits is available.
Section 710.69. Declared Water Shortage. If the City Council determines that an emergency
is present, the Council may declare a water shortage and determine that the users of the public
water mains shall be prohibited from using the water from the City Water Supply System for
certain functions on their property. All persons within the City of Medina shall comply with
regulations imposed as a result of a water shortage. Violation of this section shall be a
misdemeanor.
Section 710.71. Access to Buildings. Authorized employees of the City shall have free access
at reasonable hours of the day to all parts of every building and premises connected with the City
Water Supply System for reading of meters and inspections. If after reasonable efforts the City is
unable to gain access to a building or property to install, read, maintain, replace, or inspect any
water meter, irrespective of the reason, the water customer shall be subject to a monthly non-
compliance fee to account for the City’s inability to determine usage and properly maintain its
water meters and its overall municipal water system. Said fee may be established by the City
Council in the City’s fee schedule.
Section 710.73. Adjustments in Water Charges. The City Council is hereby authorized to
make adjustments in water charges where in its opinion the amount billed was erroneous due to
meter deficiency or other mistakes.
Section 710.75. Lawn and Landscape Irrigation Systems.
Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to promote efficient use of water for
lawn and landscape irrigation without placing an undue burden on the City’s public water
supply.
Subd. 2. Reserved.
Subd. 3. Connection of Lawn and Landscape Irrigation Systems to the City Water
Supply System.
(a) Customers installing an automatic or underground irrigation system are required to
install a rain sensor device. Existing irrigation systems are required to retrofit to
install a rain sensor device at such time as improvement or extension of the system
occurs.
(b) If located within the City Water Supply System service area, the following are
prohibited from connecting a Lawn and Landscape Irrigation System to the City
Water Supply System:
Ordinance No. 581 22
December 6, 2022
i) A property located within a subdivision that consists of five or more lots
and is zoned residential;
ii) A multiple dwelling unit structure of any size, except for properties in
locations that are served by the City storm sewer system; and
iii) A property that is over two acres in size and is zoned commercial,
industrial business park, mixed-use, or public/semi-public.
(c) This ordinance shall be applicable only to the above-described properties that install
Lawn and Landscape Irrigation Systems after the enactment of this ordinance. No
property shall be allowed to expand its Lawn and Landscape Irrigation System from
the City Water Supply System if a Storm Water Pond is available or established to
accommodate lawn and landscape irrigation service. Any property presently served
by the City Water Supply System that is requesting to expand its Lawn and
Landscaping Irrigation System shall be required to convert and connect its Lawn and
Landscaping Irrigation System to a Storm Water Pond if such Storm Water Pond is
available or must be established to accommodate lawn and irrigation service.
Subd. 4. Connection to Storm Water Ponds. Lawn and landscape irrigation water
may be obtained for any property from a Storm Water Pond under the following
conditions:
(a) All pumps associated with the Lawn and Landscape Irrigation System shall be free
standing or located in a structure that is not connected to the City Water Supply
System; and
(b) No water pumped for the Lawn and Landscape Irrigation System shall enter and no
pump or irrigation system shall in any way be connected to any structure that is
connected to the City Water Supply System.
Subd. 5. Connection of Irrigation Wells to Storm Water Ponds.
(a) An Irrigation Well may be installed on any property in order to provide additional
water to a Storm Water Pond under the following conditions:
i) Any Irrigation Well shall be constructed according to Minnesota Statutes Chapter
103I and Minnesota Rules Chapter 4725 (“Minnesota Well Code”);
ii) A Water Use (Appropriation) Permit must be obtained from the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources;
iii) Each Irrigation Well shall be equipped with either a water flow meter or a time
meter;
iv) The property owner shall provide the City with a well log and yearly pumping
records on the last day of each calendar year for each Irrigation Well located on the
property;
Ordinance No. 581 23
December 6, 2022
v) The Irrigation Well shall be protected from accidental back flow of water with a
Backflow Preventor that shall be approved in advance by the City; and
vi) Irrigation Well water shall not be used to provide flow to any water feature
where the water then flows to waste.
(b) Irrigation Well water shall be used only for irrigation of landscaping. It shall not be
used for any other use.
Subd. 6. Construction of a Lawn and Landscape Irrigation System. The location of
lines and sprinkler heads for a Lawn and Landscape Irrigation System may be located
within the City right-of-way or easement, subject to the following conditions and prior
approval of the City:
(a) The owner of the Lawn and Landscape Irrigation System is responsible for any
maintenance or repair of the Lawn and Landscape Irrigation System;
(b) The owner of the Lawn and Landscape Irrigation System signs a written agreement
with the City in which the owner agrees to assume all liability and responsibility for
damages to the Lawn and Landscape Irrigation System that is caused by City
activities, including, but not limited to, snow removal;
(c) All Lawn and Landscape Irrigation System lines located within City right-of-way or
easement shall have a location wire installed in accordance with the City’s
specifications;
(d) All Lawn and Landscape Irrigation System lines that cross City streets shall be
encased in an oversized carrier pipe; and
(e) The owner of the Lawn and Landscape Irrigation System shall provide the City with
an as-built plan of the irrigation system.
Subd. 7. Operation of Lawn and Landscape Irrigation Systems. The operation of a
Lawn and Landscape Irrigation Systems shall be subject to the following restrictions:
(a) Turf and Landscape Irrigation Best Management Practices as set forth by the
Irrigation Association for landscape irrigation systems shall be followed by the
owner at all times;
(b) Prior to any seed, sod or landscaping being placed within the Lawn and Landscape
Irrigation System area, there shall be proper Seed Bed Preparation by the owner;
and
(c) Under weather conditions where the City places an irrigation ban or other
restrictions on the use of any lawn or landscape irrigation that is connected to the
City Water Supply System, the City may also prohibit or place limitations on the
Ordinance No. 581 24
December 6, 2022
pumping from any Irrigation Well that is being utilized by a Lawn or Landscape
Irrigation System.
Subd. 8. Penalties. Any person convicted of violating this ordinance shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and shall be subject to a maximum fine or maximum period of
imprisonment, or both, as specified by Minnesota Statutes, Section 609.03.
SECTION IV: Medina Code Section 740 is amended by deleting the stricken material and
adding the double-underlined material as follows:
Section 740.01. Establishment of Department. There is hereby established a Public Utilities
Division of the Department of Public Works of the City of Medina which shall be under the
supervision of the Director of Public Works. The water and sewer systems as they are now
constituted or shall hereafter be enlarged or extended shall be operated and maintained under the
provisions of this ordinance subject to the authority of the City Council at any time to amend,
alter, change or repeal the same. The Public Utilities Division shall have responsibility for the
management, maintenance, care and operation of the sewer and water systems of the City.
Section 740.02. Definitions. Unless the context specifically indicates otherwise, the meaning of
terms used in this ordinance shall have the meanings hereinafter designated.
Subd. 1. Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (CBOD5) shall mean the
quantity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic matter present in
wastewater as measured according to the latest edition of Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater prepared and published jointly by the American
Public Health Association, the American Water Works Association, and the Water
Environment Federation.
Subd. 2. Industrial Wastewater. The liquid wastes from industrial processes, as distinct
from residential or domestic strength wastes.
Subd. 3. Normal Domestic Strength Waste. Waste water with a CBOD5 concentration
not greater than 200 milligrams per liter (mg/l) and a total suspended solids concentration
not greater than 250 mg/l.
Subd. 4. Sanitary Sewer. A sewer which carries sewage and to which storm, surface,
and ground waters are not intentionally admitted.
Subd. 5. Storm Sewer. A sewer which carries storm and surface waters and drainage,
but excludes sewage and polluted industrial wastes.
Subd. 6. Total Suspended Solids. A total suspended matter that either floats or is in
suspension in water, wastewater or other liquids, and is removable by laboratory filtering
as measured according to the latest edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of
Water and Wastewater prepared and published jointly by the American Public Health
Ordinance No. 581 25
December 6, 2022
Association, the American Water Works Association, and the Water Environment
Federation.
Section 740.03. Applications, Permits and Fees. No person, firm or corporation shall make
any type of connection to the water system, sanitary sewer system or storm sewer system except
upon making an application therefor on a form provided by the City and receiving a permit
issued by the City for such purposes. The application shall include the legal description of the
property to be served, the uses for which the connection is requested, and the size of the service
line to be used. At the time of making such application there shall be paid to the City
Administrator-Clerk fees which shall be set by the City Council from time to time by resolution
for the following purposes:
Subd. 1. No connection shall be made with respect to any sanitary sewer, water system
or storm sewer system serving the property of any person or occupants of the land, parcel
or premises affected that have not paid or provided for the payment of the full and
proportionate share of the said utilities which share shall be payable as follows:
(a) The City Council may establish water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer districts and
establish area charges, connection charges, lateral charges and similar charges for
each said district. No connection shall be made to the City water or sewer system
until the applicant or owner pays the charge or charges noted above established by
Council resolution from time to time. These charges shall be in addition to any fees
or charges required under subsections 2, 3 and 4.
(b) For service to property to which service lines have not been previously run from the
street laterals to the property line, the owner, occupant or user shall pay into the
City Treasury a service line charge, the amount of which shall not be less than the
City's cost of making the necessary connections, taps, and installation of pipe and
appurtenances to provide service to the property and the necessary street repairs,
provided, however, with the approval of the City, the owner or applicant shall have
the right to contract directly with a licensed plumber for the installation and
connection of the service line.
(c) Prior to any connections the owner, occupant or user shall pay in cash or agree to
pay charges in the form of Special Assessments to be levied against the property to
be spread over a number of years to be established by the City Council and may be
coincident with the maturity requirements of any Special Improvement Bonds sold
for the purpose of financing the construction of sanitary sewer, municipal water or
storm sewer system serving the property. Said cash payment or assessment charge
shall be in the principal amount of not less than the payments made by or charges
placed against comparable properties for like services for such sanitary sewer, water
or storm sewer system in an amount as may be established by the City Council.
Payment to the City Treasury in the form of a Special Assessment charge shall be in
the form of equal annual installments together with interest on the unpaid balance,
which shall be established by Council resolution.
Ordinance No. 581 26
December 6, 2022
(d) No connection shall be made to the sanitary sewer system until the applicant or
owner pays a Service Availability Charge (SAC) established by the Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission for the availability of treatment works and interceptors
comprising the metropolitan disposal system.
Subd. 2. Before proceeding with the construction, enlargement, alteration, repair of any
water or sewer lines connecting the water system, sanitary sewer system or storm sewer
system to any house or building, the owner or his agent shall first obtain a permit for such
purposes from the municipality through its City Administrator-Clerk. The applicant shall
pay to the City Administrator-Clerk a permit fee the amount of which shall be established
from time to time by Council resolution. The Plumbing Inspector shall examine all
applications before construction begins; and after the construction, enlargement,
alteration or repair is complete, the Plumbing Inspector shall be notified. It shall be
unlawful to cover any connecting line until an inspection has been made and such
connection and the work incident thereto has been approved by the City as a proper and
suitable connection.
Section 740.04. Connection to Systems. The owner of all buildings or properties used for
human occupancy, employment, recreation, or other purpose, situated within the City and
abutting on any street, alley or right-of-way in which there is now located a public sanitary sewer
of the City, is hereby required at the owner's expense to connect such facility directly with the
proper public sewer within 90 days after date of official notice to do so. New connections to the
sanitary sewer system shall be prohibited unless sufficient capacity is available in all
downstream facilities including but not limited to flow, strength and suspended solids. All users
making connection to the sanitary sewer system are also subject to any additional requirements
and regulations established by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and/or the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Where municipal sanitary sewer is not available, the
building shall be connected to an individual wastewater disposal system complying with the
provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Medina.
Section 740.05. Protection from Damage. No unauthorized person shall maliciously,
willfully, or negligently break, damage, destroy, uncover, deface or tamper with any structure,
appurtenance, or equipment which is a part of the municipal water or sewage works. Any person
violating this provision shall be subject to the penalty provided by this code.
Section 740.06. Delayed Connection Charge. Any owner of a residence or commercial
building to which sewer service is or becomes available shall be subject to an additional charge
as established by Council resolution from time to time upon connection to such service if such
connection is not made within the period of time which shall be established by Council
resolution after such service becomes available.
Section 740.07. Implied Consent to Rules, Regulations and Rates. Every person applying for
water or sewer service, every owner of property for which any such application is made, every
person accepting water or sewer service and every owner of property where such service is
accepted subsequent to the passage of this ordinance shall be deemed upon making such
application or accepting such service to consent to all rules, regulations and rates as established
Ordinance No. 581 27
December 6, 2022
by this ordinance and as may hereafter be set forth and adopted by the City Council by resolution
or ordinance.
Section 740.08. Installation of Connections. All connections to the water system or sanitary
sewer system shall be performed by a plumber licensed to do plumbing in the City of Medina;
except that nothing in this ordinance shall be construed as to prohibit an individual owner from
obtaining a permit to connect to an existing service line located totally within the owner's
property and installing such connection by his own labor provided, however, that said
construction is conducted under the regulations of this ordinance and all other City ordinances
and applicable Statutes of the State of Minnesota and requirements of the City Engineer and City
Plumbing Inspector.
Section 740.09. Liability for Repairs.
Subd 1. Water and Sewer Utilities Located inside the Public Right-of-Way or Public
Easement Area. After the initial connection has been made to the water service lead or
the sewer lead, the owner, occupant, and user of the premises served shall be liable for all
repairs required to any water service line or any sanitary or storm sewer line necessary
for connection of the premises to the curb stop or sewer lead, to include the actual
connection on the occupant side of the connection. It shall be the responsibility of the
owner, occupant, and user to obtain the necessary authorizations required, if any, to
complete the utility repairs. It shall be the responsibility of the owner, occupant, and user
to maintain the curb stop box or sewer clean out at a height as will ensure that it remains
at the finished grade of the property.
Subd. 2. Water and Sewer Utilities Located Outside of the Public Right-of-Way or
Public Easement Area. After the initial connection has been made to the water service
lead or the sewer lead, the owner, occupant, and user of the premises served shall be
liable for all repairs required to any water service line or any sanitary or storm sewer line
necessary for connection of the premises to the street main, including any repairs
necessary to the curb stop and box or sewer clean out and any necessary street repairs. It
shall be the responsibility of the owner, occupant, and user of the premises to obtain any
necessary authorizations, permits and approvals required to complete the utility repairs. It
shall be the responsibility of the owner, occupant, and user to maintain the curb stop box
or sewer clean out, if any, at a height as will ensure that it remains at the finished grade of
the property.
Section 740.10. Leak in Service Line. Any owner, occupant and user of a premises who shall
discover a leak in a service line to the premises shall notify the City office within twenty-four
(24) hours. Any water wasted due to failure of such person to comply with this regulation shall
be estimated by the City Clerk and be charged for against the owner at such premises at the
established rate.
Section 740.11. City Not Liable. The City shall not be held liable at any time for any
deficiency or failure in the supply of water to the customer whether the same be occasioned by
shutting off the water for repairs or connections or for any cause whatever.
Ordinance No. 581 28
December 6, 2022
Section 740.12. Emergency Regulations. The City Council may impose emergency regulations
pertaining to the conservation of water by resolution of the City Council and by giving notice by
publication or by posting in the City Hall and at such public places as the Council may direct.
Whenever the City Council determines that a shortage of water supply threatens the City, it may,
by resolution, limit the times and hours during which City water may be used for sprinkling,
irrigation, car washing, and other external purposes. After publication of a Notice setting forth
the restrictions for use of water for said purposes, no person shall use or permit water to be used
in violation of the resolution and any customer who does so, shall be charged such sum as
established by resolution for each day of violation and the charge shall be added to the
customer's next water bill. Continued violation shall be cause for discontinuance of water
service.
Section 740.13. Right to Enter Land. The City of Medina by any authorized employee or
agent shall have the right to enter and be admitted to any lands and property in the City at any
reasonable hour for the purpose of inspection of materials, plumbing work and fixtures of all
kinds used by or in connection with the water and sewer systems.
Section 740.14. Private Water not Permitted in City System. Whenever any premises are
connected to the City water system, there shall be maintained a complete physical separation
between the City water supply system and the private water supply system so that it is impossible
to intentionally or unintentionally allow any water produced by a private system to be introduced
in the supply line from the City Water System.
Section 740.15. Storm Water not Permitted in Sanitary Sewer System. It shall be unlawful
for any owner, occupant or user of any premises to direct into or allow any storm water, surface
water, ground water, well water or water from air conditioning systems to drain into the sanitary
sewer system of the City of Medina. No rain spout, or other form of surface drainage and no
foundation drainage or sump pump shall be connected or discharged into any sanitary sewer.
Section 740.16. Prohibited Wastes in Sanitary Sewer System. No person, firm or corporation
shall discharge any waste, or cause or allow any waste to be discharged into the sanitary sewer
system unless in accordance with the following regulations:
Subd. 1. Treatment of Prohibited Waste. Where it is determined that any waste
discharged or to be discharged has certain characteristics or elements which are or may
be harmful to the structures, processes or operation of the sanitary sewer system or
persons operating it, the City may:
(a) Reject the waste.
(b) Require pretreatment to an acceptable condition for discharge to the public sewers,
pursuant to Section 307(b) of the Clean Water Act and all addendums thereof.
(c) Require control over the quantities and rates of discharge, and/or,
(d) Require payment to cover added costs of handling, treatment and disposal based on
the formula as adopted by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission.
Ordinance No. 581 29
December 6, 2022
Subd. 2. Limitations on Discharge. No person, firm or corporation shall discharge or
cause, or allow to be discharged into the sanitary sewer system any waste containing
concentrations in excess of the following:
Pollutant Limitation
(Maximum for any operating day)
(a) Cadmium 2.0 mg/l
(b) Chromium, total 8.0 mg/l
(c) Copper 6.0 mg/l
(d) Cyanide, total 4.0 mg/l
(e) Lead 1.0 mg/l
(f) Mercury 0.1 mg/l
(g) Nickel 6.0 mg/l
(h) Zinc 8.0 mg/l
(i) Temperature 65 C° (150° F)
(j) pH 5.0 - 10.0
Subd. 3. Exclusion of Wastes. No person, firm or corporation shall discharge or cause
or allow to be discharged into the sanitary sewer system any waste which contains any of
the following:
(a) More than one hundred (100) mg/l of fats, wax, grease or oils (hexane soluble),
whether emulsified or not, or containing substances which may solidify or become
viscous at temperatures between 32o and 150o F (0o and 65o C) at the point of
discharge into the sewer system.
(b) Liquids, solids, or gases which by reason of their nature or quantity are or may be
sufficient to cause fire or explosion or be injurious in any other way to the sanitary
sewer system or to the operation of the system. At no time shall two (2) successive
readings on an explosimeter, at the point of discharge into the sewer system, be
more than five percent (5%) nor any single reading over ten percent (10%) of the
Lower Explosive Limit (L.E.L.).
(c) Any noxious or malodorous solids, liquids or gases, which either singly or by
interaction with other wastes, are capable of creating a public nuisance or hazard to
like, or are or may be sufficient to prevent entry into a sewer for its maintenance
and repair.
(d) Any toxic substance, chemical elements or compounds in quantities sufficient to
interfere with the biological processes of efficiency of treatment works, or that will
pass through a treatment works and cause the effluent therefrom or the water into
which it is discharged, to fail to meet applicable State or Federal Standards.
(e) Garbage that has not been ground or comminuted to such a degree that all particles
will be carried freely in suspension under flow conditions normally prevailing in
public sewers, with no particle greater than one-half inch (1/2") in any dimension.
Ordinance No. 581 30
December 6, 2022
(f) Radioactive wastes or isotopes or such half-life of concentrations that they are in
noncompliance with present or future regulations issued by the appropriate
authority having control over their use and which will or may cause damage or
hazards to the system or personnel operating it.
(g) Solids or viscous wastes which will or may cause obstruction to the flow in a sewer,
or other interference with the proper operation of and disposal system, such as
grease, uncomminuted garbage, animal guts or tissues, paunch manure, bones, hair,
hides or fleshings, entrails, whole blood, feathers, ashes, cinders, sand, spent lime,
stone or marble dust, metal, glass, straw, shavings, grass clippings, rags, spent
grains, spent hops, waste paper, wood, plastic, gas, tar, asphalt, residues from
refining or processing of fuel or lubricating oil, gasoline, naphtha, and similar
substances.
(h) Any waste from septic tanks or similar facilities.
(i) Any mineral acids, waste acid pickling or plating liquors from the pickling or
plating of iron, steel, brass, copper or chromium, or any other dissolved or solid
substances which will or may endanger health or safety, or attack or corrode any
part of the sanitary sewer system.
(j) Liquids or vapors having a temperature higher than 150° F immediately prior to
discharge into the sewer system.
(k) Phenols or other taste or odor-producing substances in concentrations which will or
may cause the effluent from the treatment works or the water into which it is
discharged to fail to meet applicable State or Federal standards.
(l) Materials which exert or cause:
(1) Unusually high concentrations of inert suspended solids or of dissolved solids.
(2) Excessive discoloration.
(3) Unusually high volume of flow or concentration of waste exceeding five (5)
times the average daily concentration of flow during normal operation.
(m) Unusually high concentrations of Total Suspended Solids, CBOD5, COD, or
chlorine requirements, in such quantities as to constitute a significant load on the
treatment works.
(n) Any substance which is not amenable to treatment or reduction by the type of
sewage treatment processes employed to a degree sufficient to permit the effluent
from the treatment works and the water into which it is discharged to meet
applicable State and Federal standards.
Ordinance No. 581 31
December 6, 2022
Subd. 4. Grease, Oil & Sand Traps. Grease, oil and sand interceptors shall be
provided, when determined necessary by the City, to properly handle liquid wastes
containing excessive amounts of floatable grease, flammable waste, sand or other
harmful ingredients. All interceptors shall be readily and easily accessible for cleaning
and inspection. The owner shall be responsible for constructing and maintaining these
interceptors and for the proper removal and disposal of captured materials.
Subd. 5. Monitoring and Inspection. Where required by the City, the owner of any
property served by a building sewer carrying industrial waste shall install a suitable
structure on the building service line with necessary appurtenances to facilitate
observation, sampling and measurement of wastes. The structure shall be installed by the
owner at his expense in accordance with plans approved by the City and shall be
maintained by the owner to be safe and accessible at all times. The owner of any property
serviced by a building sewer carrying industrial waste may, at the discretion of the City,
be required to provide laboratory measurements, tests or analysis of waters or wastes to
illustrate compliance with this Ordinance and any special condition for discharge
established by the City, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission or regulatory agencies
having jurisdiction over the discharge. All measurements, tests or analyses of waters and
wastes shall be determined in accordance with the latest edition of "Standard Methods for
the Examination of Water and Wastewater" published by the American Public Health
Association.
Subd. 6. Right to Inspect. The City through its duly authorized representative or
employ, bearing proper credentials and identification shall be permitted to enter all
properties for the purpose of inspection, observation, measurement, sampling and testing
pertinent to the discharges to the City's sewer system. The City shall be provided
information concerning industrial processes which have a direct bearing on the type and
source of discharge to the wastewater collection system.
Section 740.17. Water Meter Regulations.
Subd. 1. Before any water conveyed through the municipal water system shall be used
or utilized on the land or premises of any person, firm or corporation, there shall first be
installed a water meter that will accurately measure the water consumed on the premises,
except and unless such installation shall be exempted by the City.
Subd. 2. All applications for the installation, maintenance and repair of water meters
shall be made to the City Clerk, who shall proceed to comply with such application
within a reasonable time thereafter. All meters installed shall be furnished by the City and
shall remain the property of the City of Medina. Regulations for the cost of furnishing
and use of water meters shall be established by Council resolution.
Subd. 3. No person, firm or corporation other than the City of Medina or its designee,
shall install, maintain or repair any water meter within the City limits. Every water meter
connected to the water system shall be sealed by or under the direction of the City Clerk
or City Department of Public Works and no person, firm or corporation shall break or
remove such seal; provided, however, that a plumber licensed to do business in the City
Ordinance No. 581 32
December 6, 2022
of Medina may break such seal or remove such meter for necessary repairs, in all cases
where a seal is broken or a meter is removed by a licensed plumber, such plumber shall
notify the City Clerk of the fact within twenty-four (24) hours after the seal is broken or
the meter is removed. Whenever any seal attached to a water meter by or under the
direction of the City Clerk or City Department of Public Works is found broken, the
broken condition of such seal shall be a prima facie evidence that such seal was broken
contrary to the terms and provisions in violation of this ordinance.
Subd. 4. All water meters and/or remote readers connected to the water system shall be
accessible to the City Clerk or City Department of Public Works or designee at any
reasonable hour of any business day and the refusal of admission by any owner or
occupant of any premises wherein a water meter is installed after such owner or occupant
has been notified that admission is desired for the purpose of inspecting a water meter
installed in said premises shall constitute a violation of this ordinance.
Subd. 5. Water meters shall be repaired or replaced from time to time as is necessary to
ensure accurate measuring of the flow of water. The cost of said repair or replacement
shall be borne by the City except that whenever a meter has been damaged due to
negligence on the part of persons other than the employees of the City, the owner,
occupant or user of the premises or such other person desiring the use of the water shall
reimburse the City for the expense of repairing or replacing any such meter. Upon failure
to reimburse the City within a reasonable time and upon demand therefore, the water
service and supply to said premises may be shut off or discontinued as determined to be
in the best interest of the City.
Subd. 6. It shall be unlawful for any person to tamper with, alter, by-pass or in any
manner whatsoever interfere with the proper use and functioning of any water meter
within the City.
Subd. 7. If a meter fails to register or accurately measure the water, the charge for water
consumed shall be paid for at the established rate based upon past average billings as
determined by the City Clerk.
Subd. 8. If any meter becomes obstructed or out of order, the City may issue a work
order for it to be repaired. If at any time the customer requests to have the meter tested
for accuracy, the same shall be done by the City, with the fee determined by the City fee
schedule and charged to the customer if the meter registers 90% or more accurate. If it is
not accurate within this range, no charge will be made for testing and an adjustment on
the water bill will be made for the period of time that the meter is assumed to be
inaccurate, not to exceed two (2) billing periods.
Section 740.18. Purchased Water Not Entering Sewer System. If the lot, parcel of land, or
premises discharges sewage or industrial waste into the sanitary sewage system, either directly or
indirectly, and it can be shown to the satisfaction of the City Council that a portion of the water
measured by the water meter does not and cannot enter the sanitary sewage system, then, and in
that event, the City Council may permit or require the installation of other or additional meters in
such a manner that the quantity of water which actually could enter the sewer system may be
Ordinance No. 581 33
December 6, 2022
determined. In such case the charges or rates shall be based upon the amount of water which can
enter the sanitary sewage system.
Section 740.19. Meter Readings.
Subd. 1. The City of Medina will provide a system for water meter reading. The City
may also establish billing areas or districts and provide for the reading of meters and
billing charges monthly or such periodic intervals as the City Council shall determine
suitable and necessary from time to time by resolution.
Subd. 2. The City reserves the right to discontinue service to any customer of the water
and sanitary sewer system without notice when necessary for repairs, additional
connection or reconnection. The City reserves the right to discontinue service to any
customer of the water and sanitary sewer system with notice as hereinafter provided for
non-payment of charges or bills or for disregard of any rules or regulations in connection
with the use or operation of said system. The service of water or sanitary sewer shall not
be shut off until notice and an opportunity for a hearing have first been given to the
occupant and owner of the premises involved. The notice shall be personally served and
shall state that, if payment is not made before the date stated in the notice, but not less
than ten days after the date upon which the notice is given, the water supply to the
premises will be shut off. The notice shall also state that the occupant may, before such
date, demand a hearing before the City Council, in which case the supply will not be shut
off until after the hearing is held. If, as a result of the hearing, the City Council finds that
the amount claimed owing is actually due and unpaid and there is no legal reason why the
water supply of the delinquent customer may not be shut off in accordance with this
ordinance, the City may then shut off the supply. Whenever any service has been
discontinued for non-payment of charges or bills or for disregard of any rules or
regulations in accordance with the procedures set forth above, it shall not be resumed
except upon payment of the charges or bills accrued together with interest thereon, at a
rate to be determined by Council resolution from time to time or compliance with the
rules and regulations previously violated and payment to the City of restoration fee, the
amount of which shall be set by the City Council from time to time by resolution.
Section 740.20. Billing Regulations. The City Council shall have the authority to prescribe by
resolution the rates to be charged for water and sewer service to the customer from time to time
and may prescribe the date of billing, a discount for payment within a prescribed period and/or
penalty for failure to pay within such period and such further rules and regulations relative to the
use and operation of such systems as it may deem necessary from time to time. All accounts shall
be carried in the name of the owner who shall personally, or by his authorized agent, apply for
such service. The owner shall be liable for water supplies and sewer service to his property
whether he is occupying the property or not and any unpaid charges shall be a lien upon the
property.
Section 740.21. Rate Determinations. The purpose of this section is to establish a procedure to
recover from users of the City facilities, on an equitable basis, the share of City costs attributable
to such users and to provide funds for the operation and maintenance, debt service and
replacement. The service charges shall be based on the volume of water used and wastewater
Ordinance No. 581 34
December 6, 2022
discharged and subject to the provisions of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission strength
charge system for wastewater discharges. The basic formula for rate determinations shall be as
follows: 1. SC = DC + UC 2. DC = (DCR)(V) 3. UC = (UCR)(V) Where: SC =Service Charge,
which means the aggregate of all charges including the user charge, debt service charges and
other related charges billed periodically to users. DC =Debt Service Charge, which means the
principle and interest necessary to pay bonded indebtedness. UC =User Charge, which means a
charge levied on users for cost of operation, maintenance and replacement. DCR=Debt Charge
Rate in terms of $ per 1000 gallons. UCR=User Charge Rate in terms of $ per 1000 gallons.
V=Volume of metered water per connection.
Section 740.22. Accounting Procedures. All invoices and records of funds received and
expenses for operation, maintenance and replacement for the water and sewer systems shall be
maintained in separate accounts. These accounts shall be separate from any revenues generated
for debt service for each of the systems. Annually, the water and sewer service charge rates shall
be reviewed and adjusted by the City Council to reflect the actual costs of operation,
maintenance, replacement and debt service. In addition, the user charge rates for operation,
maintenance and replacement will be revised to accomplish the following:
Subd. 1. Maintain the proportionate distribution of operation and maintenance costs
among users and user classes.
Subd. 2. Generate sufficient review to pay the total operation and maintenance costs
necessary to properly operate and maintain the system.
Subd. 3. Apply excess revenues collected from a class of user to that class of user for the
next year and adjust the rates accordingly. Water and sewer services charges provided for
in this Ordinance shall be included as separate items on regular bills. The City shall
annually make known to all users the portions of the service charges necessary to meet
the operation, maintenance and replacement cost and which portion is necessary to meet
debt service for each system.
Section 740.23. Establishment of Tax Lien. In the event a water or sewer bill, whether
incurred prior or subsequent to the passage of this ordinance, is unpaid after the due date as
established by Council resolution from time to time, the bill shall be considered delinquent and
the service may be discontinued as provided above and the City Council may cause the charges
noted in such billing to become a lien against the property served by certifying to the County
Auditor the amount of said delinquent bill in accordance with the statutes of the State of
Minnesota. Such action is optional and may be subsequent to taking legal action to collect
delinquent accounts.
Section 740.24. Separability of Sections. In the event any provision of this ordinance shall be
held invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not
invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision hereof.
SECTION V: The ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption and publication.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Medina this 6th day of December, 2022.
Ordinance No. 581 35
December 6, 2022
By:
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
Published in the Crow River News this 15th day of December, 2022.
Resolution No. 2022-
December 6, 2022
Member _______ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF
ORDINANCE NO. xxx BY TITLE AND SUMMARY
WHEREAS, the city council of the city of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ___ an
ordinance amending sections of Chapter 7 of the code of ordinances regarding public and private
utilities; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes § 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publication by title and
summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and
WHEREAS, the ordinance is 38 pages in length; and
WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the
public of the intent and effect of the ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that
the city clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. ___ to be published in the
official newspaper in lieu of the ordinance in its entirety:
Public Notice
The city council of the city of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ___ an ordinance
amending sections of Chapter 7 of the code of ordinances regarding public and private utilities. The
ordinance provides a comprehensive revision of the public and private utilities to bring them up to
date with current standards.
The full text of Ordinance No. ___ is available from the city clerk at Medina city hall during regular
business hours.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that the city
clerk keep a copy of the ordinance in his office at city hall for public inspection and that she post a
full copy of the ordinance in a public place within the city.
Dated: December 6, 2022.
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Resolution No. 2022-
December 6, 2022
2
ATTEST:
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _____
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 December 6, 2022
City Council Meeting
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: December 1, 2022
MEETING: December 6, 2022 City Council
SUBJECT: Planning Department Updates
Land Use Application Review
A) Meander Park and Boardwalk – Meander Rd, east of Arrowhead Dr – Medina Ventures had
requested PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat approval for a development to include four
residential units north of Meander Rd, and commercial uses south of Meander Rd including a
venue, restaurant, daycare, and speculative retail space. The Planning Commission held a public
hearing on November 9 and recommended approval, provided the twinhomes were not used for
lodging units. Staff intends to present to City Council at the December 6 meeting.
B) BAPS Site Plan Review – 1400 Hamel Road – BAP Minneapolis Medina has requested an
amendment to their approved site plan review. The applicant has submitted updated architectural
information based on the City’s updated regulations pertaining to architectural elements. The
applicant has also proposed minor adjustments to the site layout previously approved. The
Council reviewed at the November 9 meeting and recommended approval. Staff intends to
present to City Council at the December 6 meeting.
C) Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial – Loram and Scannell have submitted materials for the City
to prepare an EAW for a warehouse/industrial development east of Arrowhead Drive, south of
Highway 55, to the south of Loram’s existing facility. The council approved the findings of fact
and made a negative declaration on the need for an EIS at the April 5 meeting. Staff will route
the record of decision as required. The applicant has now also applied for preliminary plat and
site plan review approval for construction of approximately 398,000 s.f. of office warehouse on
three lots. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their August 10 and October 11
meetings and recommended approval on a 4-2 vote. The City Council reviewed the wetland
replacement plan on October 18 and directed staff to prepare a notice of decision. Staff intends
to present the approval for the wetland application at the December 6 meeting. The applicant has
also submitted updated plat and plans, which are under review and staff will present after review.
D) Knappenberger Rearrangement and Easement Vacation – Gail Knappenberger has requested
approval of a lot line rearrangement between two properties in common ownership. The
applicant also requests to vacate easements adjacent to the relocated property line and proposes
to grant replacement easements next to the new line. City Council granted approval on
November 1. Staff will work with the applicant to record necessary documents to finalize the
requests.
E) Cates Ranch/Willow Drive Warehouse Industrial – Comprehensive Plan Amendment– Oppidan
has submitted a concept plan review for a 310,000 square foot warehouse/office development
east of Willow Drive, north of Chippewa Road. The applicant is requesting feedback prior to
proceeding with full design of their project. The Planning Commission reviewed and provided
comments on October 11 and Council reviewed on October 18. Staff will await formal
application.
F) Adam’s Pest Control Final Plat – Jan Har LLC has requested final plat approval for a two lot
subdivision for development of an office north of Hwy 55 and west of Willow Drive. The
MEMORANDUM
Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 December 6, 2022
City Council Meeting
property owner to the east of the site has not agreed to provide right-of-way, so the applicant
proposes access directly to Highway 55. Council granted final approval at the September 20
meeting. Staff will work with the applicant on conditions of approval before construction.
G) 500 Hamel Road Apartment Concept Plan – Medina Apartments LLC has requested review of a
concept plan review for development of a 97-unit apartment building at 500 Hamel Rd. The
Planning Commission held a public hearing at their August 10 meeting and Council provided
comments on August 16. The developer met with neighbors on September 12 and the parties
have indicated that they will meet again to discuss the project.
H) Hamel Townhomes Final Plat – 342 Hamel Rd – Hamel Townhomes, LLC has requested final
plat approval for a 30-unit townhome development. The Council granted final plat approval on
August 16. Staff will work with the applicant to finalize documents prior to beginning of
construction.
I) Ditter Heating and Cooling Site Plan Review – 820 Tower Drive – Ditter Heating and Cooling
has requested a Site Plan Review for an approximately 5,000 square foot addition to its building.
The application is incomplete for review and will be scheduled for a hearing when complete.
J) Pioneer Highlands– Pioneer Trail Preserve – These projects have been preliminarily approved
and the City is awaiting final plat application.
K) Johnson ADU CUP, St. Peter and Paul Cemetery – The City Council has adopted resolutions
approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants with the conditions of approval in
order to complete the projects.
Other Projects
A) Hackamore Road – WSB continues work to finalize plans and specification. Additionally, the
following actions have occurred in the past few weeks:
1) Staff submitted offers to five of the property owners where easements are necessary for
construction.
2) City Attorney Anderson drafted a Joint Powers Agreement which was reviewed by staff and
routed to Corcoran staff for review.
3) Elm Creek Watershed tabled the permit request for the project at the November meeting,
and WSB has met with their staff to help clarify some of the questions raised. We are hoping
for approval by Elm Creek at their 12/14 meeting.
4) WSB has submitted for wetland permitting for the project.
5) Xcel Energy has indicated that the cost to the cities to underground their line south of
Hackamore Road would be over $600,000. Staff will discuss with Corcoran, but initial
response is that the benefit likely would not justify that cost.
B) Willow Sanitary Sewer Lift Station – WSB is finalizing plans and specifications for the lift
station to serve the area near Willow Drive, north of Chippewa Road. Staff has made good
progress with getting CenturyLink to release the unutilized easement which interferes with the
preferred location of the lift station and hopes to receive the release in the middle of December.
WSB and public works is soliciting pricing for certain electronic components for the lift station
separately from the bids, to buy additional time to confirm the CenturyLink easement will be
released.
C) OpenGov Implementation – staff began working with OpenGov to implement the new building
permit software for later in 2023
D) Independence Sewer Request – staff provided Council’s direction to Independence, who
questioned assumptions in the capacity analysis and stated that they did not believe
Independence should be responsible for the cost of expanding capacity. Staff will review
information they provide and report to Council.
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jason Nelson, Director of Public Safety
DATE: December 1, 2022
RE: Department Updates
As we enter the winter months, officers have been busy with snow events. We have responded to
numerous crashes or vehicles in the ditch calls the past two weeks. When the roads get slippery during
the first few weather events, we see an uptick in these types of events every year. Both the city and
the county public works do a great job keeping the roads in good shape, but as always, there are wind
blown spots or other areas that drivers need to be aware of in the area.
This past week we had the unfortunate call to respond to an unknown medical situation at the Holiday
Gas Station. Officers arrived on scene to find an unresponsive male locked in the men’s bathroom.
With the help of Hamel Fire access was gained only to find a deceased male. Police and Fire tried life
saving efforts but to no avail. We are waiting for the official cause of death results from the Hennepin
County Medical Examiner’s Office. No foul play is suspected, and suspected narcotics were found.
Officer Jordan Myhre is progressing extremely well in his Field Training and will be soon on his own
in the final phase of training. We are excited to have him on the team and he is fitting right in with our
police department family. I hope you have had the opportunity to meet him. He is an extremely
pleasant young man and is a great addition to our team.
Patrol:
The following are updates of Patrol Officers between November 9, 2022 and November 29, 2022:
Citations –20 Warnings – 39 PD Accidents – 11
Medicals – 12 Suspicion Calls – 8 Traffic Complaints – 6
Assist Other Agencies – 11 Alarms – 11 Welfare Checks - 3
On 11/10/2022 at 0633 hours officer was dispatched to a medical in the 4400 block of Bluebell Trail
on a report of a male in and out of consciousness. Upon arrival the officer learned that a male patient
was experiencing a severe cramp in their leg and had passed out several times. The patient was
transported to the hospital by North Ambulance.
On 11/12/2022 at 1112 hours officer was dispatched to a business in the 700 block of Tower Drive on
a reported attempted burglary. Officer learned when employees arrived for work, they found several
exterior door handles on the business had been damaged in an apparent attempt to break in the
building. Access was not gained to the building. Case was referred to Investigations.
On 11/14/2022 at 2354 hours officer was dispatched to a report of an unwanted intoxicated person
inside McDonalds. A male was found extremely intoxicated and did not have a place to stay for the
night. The officer determined the male was not capable of caring for themselves and requested an
ambulance to transport the male to the hospital.
On 11/16/2022 at 2320 hours officers were called to a welfare check at the Wealshire of Medina. A
male caller requested assistance getting him out of the facility. Officers made contact with staff and
the resident of the facility that had called. Everything was okay with the resident and he apologized
for calling.
On 11/20/2022 at 0954 hours officers were dispatched to a holdup alarm at Holiday, 200 Highway 55.
Upon arrival officers had Dispatch attempt to call inside but they got no answer. Officers entered the
business and found two employees inside who said a new employee had accidentally triggered the
alarm. Prior to clearing, officer learned one of the employees had a warrant for their arrest. The
warrant was a sign and release warrant. The employee was provided a new court date and returned to
work.
On 11/23/2022 at 1845 hours officers were dispatched to a welfare check at Target. A welfare check
was requested on a male who was found passed out in the bathroom of the store. Officers made
contact with the male who was found to have been inhaling the contents of aerosol duster cans. The
male refused to go to the hospital and was trespassed from Target.
On 11/25/2022 officers were dispatched to a mental health problem in the 1500 block of Homestead
Trail. It was reported a male at the address was suicidal and in possession of a large butcher knife. By
the time officers arrived the parents had gotten the knife away from their adult son. The male was
transported to the hospital for an evaluation.
On 11/27/2022 at 1638 hours officers were dispatched to a possible overdose at Holiday, 200 Highway
55. Employees reported a male was possibly in the bathroom overdosing and that a female had been
pounding on the door trying to get him to open it. Upon arrival officers found the door locked and that
employees did not have a key to the door. With assistance from Hamel Fire Department, the door was
breached and a male was found lying unresponsive on the floor of the bathroom. Lifesaving measures
were attempted but were ultimately unsuccessful. The Hennepin County Medical Examiner will be
determining the cause of death.
On 11/29/2022 at 1259 hours officers were dispatched to a narcotics complaint at Target. It was
reported a male was in the restroom doing drugs. Upon arrival officers learned the same male from a
previous incident was inhaling aerosol cans in the restroom and had stolen some items. The male was
cited for trespassing and theft. He was transported to a hotel in Plymouth where he had been staying
and released.
Investigations:
Completed a Criminal Sexual Conduct investigation that began in July of 2022. Two victims were
identified as being sexually assaulted over several years. The suspect was arrested and formally
charged with First and Second Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct.
Received a report of fraudulent credit card use. Investigation on-going.
Continued investigation into two burglaries and a car theft, where two individuals were identified.
Two phones were seized, and a warrant was conducted on them to further the investigation. On-going.
Continued training two new Community Service Officers (CSO).
Began training all police staff on the use of a new AED that we will be receiving in the beginning or
middle of December.
Began implementation of a new pawn store system (LEADS Online) and working with the company to
get our account set-up including accounts for all officers. The system allows for searching of pawn
shops, second-hand stores (i.e., GameStop), junk and scrapyards, eBay, OfferUp, and more. This is a
nationwide system.
There are currently 9 cases assigned to investigations.
1
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director
DATE: November 29, 2022
MEETING: December 06, 2022
SUBJECT: Public Works Update
STREETS
• Public Works has been busy with a snow event this week. Equipment is in good
shape, and we are ready for a long snow season.
• Corcoran and Medina Staff have been working to finalize the plans for the
Hackamore Road project.
• Public Works graded and compacted most of the gravel streets which makes a big
difference during snow plowing season.
WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER
• WSB and Staff held a pre-construction meeting for the water treatment plant filter
rehab project. We will work on filter one first while we use filter two to provide clean
water. The filter media will be removed, the filter will be inspected, sand blasted, and
the interior will be painted.
• I received a call about a sewer service line problem on Wildflower Trail. We
televised the pipe and found the issue to be a broken pipe which will either need to be
excavated or a liner installed.
• Public Works received our first shipment of new radios for the reading system
upgrade this week. We are working on a plan to install them in the coming months.
PARKS/TRAILS
• Public Works finished burning the wood from the outbuildings on the Chippewa
Road park property. With winter fast approaching, we will likely wait until spring to
remove the last of the concrete and fire debris.
• Preparations are in the works for the ice-skating rinks, which is our most asked-about
amenity in the winter. However, until the ground freezes solid, water seeps through
the rink bottom. Once temperatures drop, we can make snow for the sledding hill.
MISC
• The new plow truck to replace the 2003 Sterling single axle will arrive in the next few
weeks. The body and snow equipment will then be installed. It is not likely to go
into service this season.
MEMORANDUM
ORDER CHECKS NOVEMBER 15, 2022 – DECEMBER 6, 2022
053661 ANDERSON, JOHN .................................................................... $208.00
053662 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. ........................................................... $611.64
053663 BANDY, RACHEL ........................................................................ $247.00
053664 BANKERS TITLE ........................................................................... $68.17
053665 BEAUDRY OIL & PROPANE ................................................... $5,434.50
053666 BODOR, SOPHIA .......................................................................... $97.50
053667 BOHN, JUDITH ANN ................................................................... $130.00
053668 CONNELLY, DEBRA L ................................................................ $211.25
053669 CORE & MAIN LP .................................................................. $31,076.64
053670 DAHLOF, ANGELA ..................................................................... $227.50
053671 DEJUTE PAUL M ........................................................................ $217.75
053672 DONNELL, SARAH ..................................................................... $425.75
053673 DPC INDUSTRIES INC ................................................................. $10.00
053674 DYSTE, CYNTHIA ANN .............................................................. $260.00
053675 FRITZ, ANDREW/JODI ................................................................. $47.42
053676 GRAVIER, GARY ........................................................................ $247.00
053677 HENN COUNTY INFO TECH ................................................... $2,729.17
053678 HENN COUNTY TREASURER ................................................ $2,064.82
053679 HENN COUNTY TREASURER ................................................ $6,207.97
053680 HIGHWAY 55 RENTAL ............................................................... $175.49
053681 KASNER, DEB ............................................................................ $217.75
053682 KAYALEN, DIYA .......................................................................... $201.50
053683 KOEHLER, ELIZABETH .............................................................. $224.25
053684 LADWIG, TODD .......................................................................... $247.00
053685 LEACH-GRAVIER, CAROLYN J ................................................. $243.75
053686 MEDTOX LABS ............................................................................. $54.57
053687 MN DEPT OF LABOR/INDUSTRY .............................................. $100.00
053688 MOEN, LINDA ............................................................................. $260.00
053689 MOHAMED, FARHIA ................................................................... $234.00
053690 NADEAU, PAULINE .................................................................... $139.75
053691 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC ........................................................ $176.53
053692 NELLERMOE, BARBARA ........................................................... $234.00
053693 NIELSEN, BETH .......................................................................... $451.75
053694 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTION LLC ............................................... $222.25
053695 PLEC, GREGORY ....................................................................... $211.25
053696 PLEC, TORI ................................................................................. $247.00
053697 RCM SPECIALTIES, INC. ........................................................ $3,625.00
053698 REPUBLIC SERVICES ............................................................... $793.09
053699 RESSLER, SHARON M .............................................................. $432.25
053700 RICHMOND, TERRY R. .............................................................. $247.00
053701 ROSSINI, RACHELLE ................................................................. $237.25
053702 RUSSELL SECURITY RESOURCE INC .................................... $117.50
053703 SCHMIDT, KATHLEEN ............................................................... $208.00
053704 SCHUTTE, MARIE ...................................................................... $321.75
053705 SELLERS, DANIEL ..................................................................... $143.00
053706 STETLER, CHRISTINE ............................................................... $217.75
053707 STREICHER'S ............................................................................. $581.94
053708 WATER DOCTORS ..................................................................... $255.00
053709 WEIR, ELIZABETH ...................................................................... $139.75
053710 WILSON, KIM .............................................................................. $139.75
053711 XING, AI....................................................................................... $185.25
053712 ZIETLOW, SUSAN ...................................................................... $117.00
053713 CENTURYLINK INC ................................................................. $1,500.00
053714 DEVARAPALLI, ANJI .................................................................. $500.00
053715 HENN COUNTY TREASURER ..................................................... $98.16
053716 LAMERE-DRAGOVICH, MELISSA ............................................. $500.00
053717 RAHMAN, MD SHAHEDUR ........................................................ $500.00
053718 THUMMALA, VINAYREDDY ....................................................... $500.00
053719 BURNET TITLE ........................................................................... $170.39
053720 EXECUTIVE TITLE ..................................................................... $627.33
053721 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC ............................................................. $260.00
053722 MISHRA, DEBASIS ..................................................................... $500.00
053723 STUCKEY, RHONDA .................................................................. $250.00
053724 SWANSON HOMES ............................................................... $10,000.00
053725 AMERICAN MAILING MACHINES .............................................. $499.70
053726 BEAUDRY OIL & PROPANE ................................................... $1,552.19
053727 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC ................................................... $3,976.56
053728 BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION INC ............................... $111,460.00
053729 DINIUS FENCE LLC ............................................................... $12,000.00
053730 DESIGNING NATURE, INC. .................................................... $3,225.50
053731 ECM PUBLISHERS INC .............................................................. $180.96
053732 FEHN COMPANIES INC .......................................................... $8,318.25
053733 HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES I ................................. $500.00
053734 HAWKINS INC. ......................................................................... $6,380.80
053735 ISC COMPANIES INC ................................................................... $27.16
053736 KOTHRADE SEWER, WATER & ................................................ $302.00
053737 METRO ALARM CONTRACTORS INC ...................................... $265.38
053738 MINNESOTA STREET WORKS INC .......................................... $380.00
053739 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC ........................................................ $400.51
053740 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTION LLC ............................................... $164.73
053741 OPENGOV, INC. .................................................................... $50,705.00
053742 POLLARD WATER .COM ............................................................. $54.50
053743 RAYMOND FLEMAL ................................................................ $4,500.00
053744 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES INC ................................... $9,251.91
053745 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY .................................... $1,065.95
053746 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL ................................................................. $686.03
053747 TEGRETE CORP ..................................................................... $1,861.00
053748 TIMESAVER OFFSITE ................................................................ $454.00
053749 TOWMASTER ............................................................................... $45.00
053750 ULINE .......................................................................................... $191.56
053751 SSI MN TRANCHE 1 #10322006 ............................................. $3,287.27
053752 SSI MN TRANCHE 3 #10327096 ............................................. $3,868.85
053753 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER .................................................. $575.60
053754 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE ................................................... $20.00
Total Checks $303,530.49
ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS NOVEMBER 15, 2022 – DECEMBER 6, 2022
006610E AFLAC ......................................................................................... $491.08
006611E CIPHER LABORATORIES INC. .................................................. $330.64
006612E ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICE .................................................... $6,383.16
006613E FURTHER...................................................................................... $72.50
006614E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC ............................................................. $952.97
006615E PR PERA ................................................................................ $20,192.26
006616E PR FED/FICA ......................................................................... $19,123.87
006617E PR MN Deferred Comp ............................................................ $2,784.00
006618E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA .................................................... $4,348.13
006619E CITY OF MEDINA ......................................................................... $24.00
006620E FURTHER................................................................................. $1,929.37
006621E FURTHER.................................................................................... $690.47
006622E MINNESOTA, STATE OF ......................................................... $1,763.00
006623E XCEL ENERGY ........................................................................... $649.91
006624E CENTERPOINT ENERGY ........................................................... $878.25
006625E DELTA DENTAL ....................................................................... $2,687.39
006626E GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVI ....................................... $178.95
006627E MARCO (LEASE) ........................................................................ $795.61
006628E XCEL ENERGY ........................................................................... $793.52
006629E WRIGHT HENN COOP ELEC ASSN ....................................... $2,272.17
Total Electronic Checks $67,341.25
PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT NOVEMBER 23, 2022
0512308 MILINKOVICH, JACOB ............................................................... $658.62
0512309 WIESE, TANNER L ..................................................................... $436.72
0512310 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L. .................................................... $1,165.48
0512311 BARNHART, ERIN A. ............................................................... $2,788.42
0512312 BOECKER, KEVIN D. ............................................................... $3,354.06
0512313 CONVERSE, KEITH A. ............................................................ $2,334.74
0512314 DEMARS, LISA ........................................................................ $1,558.38
0512315 DION, DEBRA A. ...................................................................... $2,091.51
0512316 ENDE, JOSEPH ....................................................................... $2,549.06
0512317 FINKE, DUSTIN D. ................................................................... $2,869.01
0512318 GLEASON, JOHN M................................................................. $1,877.22
0512319 GREGORY, THOMAS .............................................................. $2,378.64
0512320 HALL, DAVID M. ....................................................................... $3,214.32
0512321 HANSON, JUSTIN .................................................................... $2,360.83
0512322 JACOBSON, NICOLE ................................................................. $909.86
0512323 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. .............................................................. $2,740.17
0512324 KLAERS, ANNE M. .................................................................. $1,616.29
0512325 LEUER, GREGORY J. ............................................................. $1,849.04
0512326 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. ................................................... $1,651.74
0512327 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D ........................................................... $2,341.39
0512328 MYHRE, JORDAN J ................................................................. $2,704.38
0512329 NELSON, JASON ..................................................................... $2,795.93
0512330 RATKE, TREVOR J .................................................................. $1,785.77
0512331 REINKING, DEREK M .............................................................. $2,327.14
0512332 RUTH, BRENDA L. ................................................................... $1,652.48
0512333 SCHARF, ANDREW ................................................................. $2,468.89
0512334 SCHERER, STEVEN T. ........................................................... $2,527.21
0512335 THIES, ANN C ............................................................................. $541.22
0512336 VINCK, JOHN J ........................................................................ $1,842.74
0512337 VOGEL, NICHOLE ................................................................... $1,072.29
0512338 WALKER, CAITLYN M. ............................................................ $1,910.20
0512339 BURSCH, JEFFREY ................................................................... $428.25
Total Payroll Direct Deposit $62,802.00