Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout11) 8C Appeal of the Planning Commissions decision denying a CUP to establish a KTV BusinessAGENDA ITEM 8.C. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM January 17 , 2017 The Honorable City Co un ci l Bryan Cook , City Manager Via : Michael D. Forbes, Community Development Director ·"/ Scott Re imers , Planning Manager By : Adam Gulick , Associate Planner APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 'S DECISION DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A 7,891 SQUARE FOOT KARAOKE TELEVISION (KTV) BUSINESS IN THE CAMELLIA SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER, LOCATED AT 9055 LAS TUNAS DRIVE , UNIT 125 RECOMMENDATION: The City Council is requested to : 1. Open the public hearing ; 2 . Accept public tes t imony from the applicant and members of the public ; and 3 . Adopt Reso lution N o . 17-5232 (Attachment "A ") finding that the project is exempt from the Ca lifornia Environmenta l Quality Act (CEQA) and denying File No. PL 15-316. BACKGROUND: 1. On October 28, 2015 , the app l icant submitted the application . 2. On July 14, 20 16 , th e app l ication was deemed complete . 3 . On September 15 , 2016 , the pub li c hea ring notice of the Planning Commission hearing on this matter was mailed to the property owners within 500 feet of the property. Notice of the public hearing was also published in the Temple City Tribune and posted at the City Council Chambers . City Council January 17, 2017 Page 2 of 7 4. On August 9, 2016 , the Planning Commission continued the item to September 27 , 2016 . 5 . Prior to the Planning Commission meeting on September 27, 2016 , three emails from residents were sent to the City objecting to the request to establish a KTV business in the Camellia Square shopping center (Attachment "B"). The emails cited concerns with the following: noise ; prostitution ; public intoxication ; underage drinking ; traffic increase ; loitering ; food odor; and transients . One of the emails stated some other concerns ; however , those items had no relation to the proposed KTV business . 6 . On September 27 , 2016 , the Planning Commission held the public hearing to consider the application . The Planning Commission re ceived the report from staff and took testimony from the applicant and the public (Attachment "C" and "D "). At the Planning Commission meeting , a petition was submitted by 11 residents that were in opposition of the project citing concerns that the business would increase noise , increase traffic, and the late operation hours would be incompatible with the quiet residential neighborhood (Attachment "E"). The Planning Commission unanimously voted to deny the request to establish a KTV establishment citing issues with neighborhood compatibility. 7 . On September 28 , 2016 , a proponent of the project submitted a letter responding to the concerns from the residents , C ity staff, and Planning Commission (Attachment "F"). 8 . On October 5 , 2016 , the applicant filed an appeal of the Planning Commission 's decision with the City Cl e rk (Attachment "G "). 9. On November 2, 2016 , the public hearing notice of the City Council appeal hearing on th is matter was mailed to the property owners within 500 feet of the property . Notice of the public hearing was also published in the Temple City Tribune and posted at the City Council Chambers . 10. On November 9, 2016 , an email was sent to the City from a resident expressing opposition to the KTV business in the Camellia Square shopping center (Attachment "1"). The email expressed concerns with the late operating hours and negative impacts to the adjacent neighborhood 's quality of life . 11 . On November 10, 2016 , the applicant requested that the item be continued to a date uncertain . 12. On November 15, 2016 , the City Council continued the public hearing item to a date uncertain (Attachment "J "). City Council January 17, 2017 Page 3 of7 13 . On December 16, 2016 , the applicant informed City staff that they were ready to proceed with th e public hearing . 14. On January 6, 2017 , the public hearing notice of the City Council appeal hearing on this matter was mailed to the property owners within 500 feet of the property, mailed to those who spoke at the Planning Commission regarding this item , and sent to those who ema il ed comments . The public hearing notice was also posted at the project site and posted at the City Council Chambers . 15 . On January 9, 2017 , the public hearing notice was also published in the San Gabriel Valley Newspaper. ANALYSIS: Appeal The applicant has filed an appeal of the Planning Commission 's decision stating that the cond itional use permit should be approved for the following reasons: it is located in a shopping center and the use is conditionally permitted in this zone; they would have an adequate number of security personnel that are professionally trained ; the management staff has experience operating other KTV establishments; and no alcohol would be served. See Attachment "G" for the appeal letter. Proposed Business Operation The applicant is proposing a KTV establishment in a 7 ,891 square foot unit located in Building 1 (9055 Las Tunas Drive , Unit 125). The proposed floor plan includes a lobby , utility room , office , food and drink preparation area, 19 private karaoke rooms, and two restrooms (Attachment "H"). The smallest karaoke room would accommodate up to seven customers and the largest karaoke room would accommodate up to 16 customers . The applicant indicated that they would rent private rooms to groups at an hourly rate . The business would offer non-alcoholic drinks (e .g ., soda , hot tea , fruit tea , and fresh juice), fresh fruit platters , and prepackaged snacks (e.g., potato chips , peanuts, sunflower seeds , mixed nuts, and dried fruit). The business would not serve alcoholic beverages . The business originally planned to offer beer and wine (Type 41 license), but the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) informed them that the business does not qualify as a "bona fide public eating place" because it does not have a full kitchen ; therefore , the business is not eligible to apply for a Type 41 license. The business is proposing to operate seven days a week , from 11 :00 a.m . to 12 midnight Monday through Thursday , and with extended hours until 2 a .m . the following morn ing on Friday and Saturday. The applicant is requesting the same extended hours until 2 :00 a .m. on Sunday evening when Monday is a national holiday . Service call reports that City Council January 17 , 2017 Page 4 of 7 staff received from the El Monte Police Department and Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department (discussed on page 4) indicate that most police calls for service to karaoke establishments occur after midnight. Staff therefore recommended that the applicant modify the proposed hours of operation to close at midnight every day; however the applicant moved forward with the request to stay open until 2 a .m. on weekends . Conditional Use Permit Analysis The conditional use permit process allows the City to analyze potential issues pertaining to a project and to minimize or eliminate potential adverse effects through co nditions of approval. Staff identified three main issues that needed to be analyzed in order to determine if the bu siness would have any adverse effects on th e surrounding properties . Staff analyzed neighbo rhood compa tibility (operation , security , and noise), parking , and the food and drink establishment limit for the shopp ing center. N eighborhood Compatibility The properties directly north of the site are single-family resident ial that are buffered by a nine-foot tall decorative fence and landscap ing . Some of these properties are located on Myda Avenue , which is a cul -de-sac with no access to the shopping center. The site is also accessed from Sultana Avenue , which is also lined with single-family residential properties. The properties to the east, south , and west are commercial, primarily consisting of retail and food uses . Most of the food and drink establishments in the Camellia Square shopping ce nter are open until midnight on the wee kends , with the exception of the Kang Ho Do BaekJeong , which was approved by the City Council to operate until 2 :00 a .m . seven days a w eek , with no food or drink orders allowed after 1:00 a .m . Staff researched other jurisdi ctions in th e San Gabriel Valley to see if there were any issues with existing KTV estab lishm e nts . Staff found that KTV businesses have demonstrated a history of in cide nts requiring law enforcement service ca lls . The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department provided service call reports from Ja nuary 2014 through September 2015 for the KTV location in Rowland Heights named Melody Karaoke that does not have a license to serve alcohol. The business had one service call for a fight that occurred outside the business , one incident where the security guard for th e busin ess was threatened by a customer , incidents relating to people drinking and smoking inside the establi shme nt , and a customer claiming that they were c harged a fee to bring in their own alcohol. The City of El Monte also provided informatio n relating to service calls for two of their KTV establishments on Lower Azusa Road between June 2014 and September 2015 . One of the locations had a service call for an alcohol related incident that required m edical attention , two service calls for fighting , and two service calls for automobile accidents. City Council January 17, 2017 Page 5 of 7 On May 10 , 2016 , the City of Arcadia Planning Commission revoked a business license for a KTV establishment (Cash Bo x KTV) that received entitlements in 1991 . The entitlement from 1991 allowed the business to serve alcohol , but their ABC license was revoked in 1992. The City of Arcadia cited in their staff report three main reasons that the business license should be revoked -the business was operating past the approved business hours ; the business installed cooking facilities and served food without necessary approvals ; alcohol was being served to customers; and customers were allowed to bring in their own alcohol. Planning staff also requested comments from the Sheriff's Department rega rding the proposal. Temple Station staff spoke with deputies from other stations that have KTV businesses in their jurisdiction . The Sheriff's Department expressed concerns with the multiple small rooms combined with this type of business attracting younger crowds . They also expressed concerns with these types of businesses resulting in service calls for underage drinking and/or illegal alcohol sales , drug use, prostitution , fights , noise , and public intoxication. Security Staff initially had concerns with the applicant proposing only one security guard and four KTV staff on Friday through Sunday from 5:00 p .m . until closing time . The primary concern was having only five personnel controlling 250 customers if the business was at full occupancy . The applicant was responsive to staff's concerns and indicated that they were willing to increase the number of KTV staff to 20 and five security guards Friday through Sunday from 5 :00p.m . until closing time . The applicant indicated that they would hire a professional security company that would have state licensed security guards . Noise Many cities have performance standards in their zoning codes to minimize the adverse effects of commercial and industrial businesses on adjacent res idential properties . Such standards often include restrictions on hours of operation . Temple City 's Zoning Code does not have performance standards but allows for such issues to be reviewed through the conditional use permit process. The Zoning Code requires a conditional use permit for uses that typically operate during late night or early morning hours such as bowling alleys , billiard/pool halls, automatic car washes , live entertainment (dancing or singing), movie theaters, restaurants , and service stations . The nearest residence is approximately 60 feet from the rear wall of the KTV establishment, separated by a driveway and loading dock area . While the KTV space does not have any rear windows or doors opening directly to the outside , the rear exit for the unit opens to a service corridor that opens to the loading dock area facing the neighboring residential properties . Employees or customers may use this exit to step outside to smoke or loiter, generating noise that would be heard from neighboring properties . If the rear doors were propped open while people loitered outside, noise from inside the business would likely spill into the adjacent residential neighborhood . While City Council January 17, 2017 Page 6 of 7 these types of activities are possible with any type of business , customers are more likely to step outside to smoke or loiter with the proposed KTV business given the number of people inside at one time and the length of time they may spend there . Parking The appli cant provided a parking demand analysis as requested by City staff to determine the parking requirement for the KTV establishment since the City does not have a spec ific parking standard for this typ e of business . Th e applicant retained the services of Linscott , Law, and Greespan (LLG ) Traffic Engineers to prepare a parking demand analysis of existing KTV facilities in the area (Atta chment "C"). Th e study demonstrates that 7 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of building area is the average of the three KTV locations during the weekend peak parking period . LLG concludes that the business would require 8 .9 parking space s per 1,000 square feet of building area during the peak hours , or 70 .2 3 parking spaces . The property owner retained their own traffic engineer, Kunzman Associates , Inc. (Kunzman) to provide an analysis (Attachment "C") to determine if the shopping center has sufficient parking to accommodate the proposed KTV establishment, in particular during the peak food and drink establishment hours . The Kunzman parking study used a parking ratio of 7 .7 parking spa ces per 1,000 square feet by using the average 7 parking spaces per 1 ,000 square feet from the LLG study, plus an additional 10 percent overage as a conservative e stimate for a KTV business . Kunzman 's analysis determined that there would be a surplus of 50 parking spaces during the highest peak parking period , which is in De cember during the weekend lunch hours . Even using the higher parking ratio of 8.9 parking spaces pe r 1,000 square feet for the KTV business preferred by City staff and recommended by LLG , there would still be a surplus of 40 parking spaces . Food and Drink Establishme nt Limit for th e Cam ellia Square Shopping Center Although the proposed floor plan gives the appearance of a kitchen , this area is required by the health department since the business is preparing fresh fruit platters and fresh fruit juice . The applicant has indicated that there will only be prepa ckaged food (e .g., potato chips , peanuts , sunflower seeds , mixed nuts , and dried fruit) and no cooking facilities are shown on the floor plan . Since the primary function of the business is the rental of private KTV rooms and the sale of d rinks and food is ancillary to the primary use, staff determined that the business should not be counted towards the maximum food and drink area approved for the shopping center under the conditional use permit. Conclusion Due to the close proximity to residential properties , and the number and type of service calls for KTV businesses in other nearby jurisdictions (Arcadia , El Monte , Rowland Heights), there is sufficient evidence to show that the proposed KTV business would likely have adverse effects on surrounding properties . If the proposed KTV business were at a different location further away from residential properties , such as another City Council January 17 , 2017 Page 7 of 7 tenant space in Camellia Square or in another shopping center on Rosemead Boulevard , the potential adverse effects on neighboring properties would be less of a concern . The City received three emails in opposition to the application prior to the Planning Commission meeting . Two residents spoke in opposition of the application and a petition was submitted that included 11 signatures in opposition of the applicatio n at the Planning Commission meeting . These residents expressed concerns with impacts to noise, increase in crime , and cons uming alcohol without a license . CITY STRATEGIC GOALS: Upholding the Planning Commission 's decision and denying the application will promote the City's Strategic Goals of Public Health and Safety and Quality of Life . FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this item will not have an impact on the City's budget. ATTACHMENTS: A. Resolution No . 17-5232 B . Emails Received in Opposition of the KTV Application C. Planning Commiss ion Staff Report and Attachments, September 27 , 2016 D. Plann ing Commission Minutes , September 27, 2016 E . Petition Submitted in Opposition of the KTV Application F. Email from a Proponent of the KTV Application G . Appeal Form H. Reduced Site Plan and Floor Plan I. Email Received in Opposition of the KTV Application J . Memo to City Council , November 15 ,2016 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO. 17-5232 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C ITY OF TEMPLE CITY DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (FILE NO . PL 15-316) TO ALLOW THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A KARAOKE TELEVISION (KTV) BUSINESS IN THE CAMELLIA SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER AT 9055 LAS TUNAS DRIVE, UNIT 125 . THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE : SECTION 1. The City Council has considered all of the evidence submitted into the administrative record, which includes, but is not limited to: 1. Reports and presentation of project related data and analysis prepared by the Community Development Department. 2 . The City of Temple City Municipal Code , and all other applicable regulations and codes. 3. Public comments , written and oral , received and/or submitted at or prior to the public hearing , supporting and/or opposing the applicant's request. 4 . Testimony and/or comments from the applicant and its representatives submitted to the City in both written and oral form at or prior to the public hearing . 5. All related documents received and/or submitted at or prior to the publ ic hearing . SECTION 2. Based on the fol lowing prefa cing facts as more fully set forth 1n the administrative record, th e City Counci l finds that: 1. On October 28 , 2015 , th e applicant submitted an application to establish a 7 ,891 square foot KTV business . 2 . On July 14 , 2016 , th e application was deemed complete . 3 . On August 9 , 2016 , the Planning Commission continued the item to September 27 , 2016. Notice of this hearing was mailed to the property owners within 500 feet of the property. Notice of the public hearing was also publ ished in the Temple City Tribune and posted at the City Counci l Chambers. 4 . Prior to the Planning Commission meeting on September 27, 2016 , the City received three emails in opposition of the project. The emails were provided to the Planning Commission and were included as part of the public record . City Council of the City of T em pie City Resolution No. 17-5232 January 17 , 2017 Page 2 5 . On Septe mber 27, 2016 , th e Planning Comm iss ion held the public hearing to consider the application . Th e Planning Commissio n received the report from staff, heard from th e applicant , and took testim ony from t he public. A petition was submitted at thi s meeting that in c luded 11 signatures from residents that opposed the applica tion . Th e Planning Commission voted to deny the conditiona l use permit application. 6 . O n Octobe r 5, 2016 , th e app li cation filed an appea l of the Planning Commission 's decision with th e City Clerk. 7. On Nove mb e r 2 , 2016 , the public hearing notice of the City Council appeal hearing on thi s matter was mailed to the property owners within 500 feet of the property . Noti ce of the pub lic hearing was a lso publ ished in the Temple City Tribune and posted at the City Council Chambers. 8 . On November 10 , 2016 , the app li cant requested that the item be continued to a date un certa in . 9. On No vember 15 , 2016 , th e City Counci l continu ed the public hearing to conside r the appeal of th e Planning Com mis sion 's decision. 10.0n December 16 , 2016 , the app li ca nt informed Ci ty staff that they were ready to proceed wi th the public hearing. 11 . On January 6, 2017 , the public hearing notice of the City Council appeal hearing on this ma tter was mailed to t he property owners within 500 feet of the property, mailed to th ose who spoke at th e Planning Commission regarding th is item , and sent to those who emailed comments . The public hearing notice was also posted at the project site and posted at th e City Counci l C hambers . 12 . On January 9, 2017, the pub li c hearing notice was also publ ished in the San Gabrie l V a ll ey Newspaper. 13 . Notice of th e pu b li c hearings satisfies th e noticing requiremen ts set forth in Governme nt Code Sections 65090 and 65091. 14 . The project s ite is zoned C-2 , General Commercial. 15 . The project si te is designated Commercial by the General Plan . SECTION 3. Based upon a public hearing for the modification of the conditional use permit , the City Coun ci l finds : 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size , shape , topography , and circumstances; and City Council of the City of Temple City Resolution No . 17-5232 January 17 , 2017 Page 3 The subject site contains 81,469 square feet of building area on 159,521 square feet of land area. The request is to establish a 7 ,891 square foot karaoke television (KTV) business in Building 1, an existing building , of the Camellia Square shopping center. Two parking studies were provided by professional traffic engineers to determine the required parking for the proposed KTV business , and to determine if there would be any effect on parking for the shopping center during the peak lunch and dinner hours. The parking studies concluded that there would be a surplus of 40 parking spaces during the peak parking period based on the approved food and drink establishments , proposed KTV business, and the remaining commercial space area as office/retail. Therefore , the project meets this finding . 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways, adequate in width and pavement type to carry the quantity and quality of traffic generated by the proposed use; and The proposal is to establish a new 7 ,891 square foot KTV business in the shopping center that has access from Rosemead Boulevard (via Elm Avenue), Las Tunas Drive , and Sultana Avenue. The applicant has provided parking stud ies from professional traffic engineers illustrating that the shopping center has sufficient parking to serve the approved uses and the KTV business . The vehicle volumes on Las Tunas Drive and Rosemead Boulevard are so high that added trips from the proposed use would be negligible . Therefore , the project meets this finding . 3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon the use, enjoyment or valuation of adjacent or neighboring properties or upon the public welfare. The proposed 7 ,891 square foot KTV business in the Camellia Square shopping center is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood . The applicant is requesting to operate until 2 :00 a .m . the following morning on Friday and Saturday evenings , and on Sunday evenings when Monday is a national holiday . All of the food and drink establishments in the Camellia Square shopping center close at midnight on weekends with the exception of Kang Ho Do BaekJeong , which was approved to operate until 2 :00a .m . with last call for food and drinks at 1:00 a .m. However, Kang Ho Do BaekJeong is located further away from the adjoining residential neighborhood and is buffered from the neighborhood by a two-story building and parking lot. Therefore the proposed KTV business will have a greater adverse effect on neighboring properites . Furthermore, review of law enforcement reports from City of El Monte, City of Arcadia , and Rowland Heights (Unincorporated L.A. County) have demonstrated an increase in service calls from law enforcement compared to other commercial businesses . A majority of the service calls occurred after midnight and were alcohol related incidents (e .g., intoxicated customers , customers bringing in their City Council of the City of Temple City Resolution No. 17-5232 January 17, 2017 Page4 own alcohol, businesses serving alcohol without necessary approvals , customers fighting , and customers threatening a security guard). Additionally , the Sheriff's Department expressed similar concerns with the businesses common attraction to illegal activities (i .e ., underage drinking , drug use , prostitution , noise , etc.). Given the number of incidents from other KTV businesses in the area , the proposed KTV business is likely to have adverse effects on the adjacent residential properties , especially during late night and early morning hours . Therefore , the project does not meet this finding . SECTION 4. This project is Categorically Exempt from environmental review pursuant to §15301 (Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines . SECTION 5. Accordingly , th e City Council denies File No . PL 15-316, a conditional use permit to establish a KTV business in a shopping center. • SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution . PASSED , APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2017 . MAYOR City Council of the City of Temple City Resolution No . 17-5232 January 17 , 2017 ATTEST: CITY CLERK Page 5 APPROVED AS TO FORM : CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that the forego i ng Resolution , Resolution No . 17-5232 , was adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple City at a regular meeting held on the 17h of January, 2017, by the following vote : AYES : Council Members : NOES : Council Members : ABSENT: Council Members : ABSTAIN : Council Members : Adam Gulick From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag : Due By: Flag Status: To Wh o m It M ay Co ncern: A nna Li <annali91780@gmail.com > Sunday, September 2 5, 2016 10:19 PM ATTACHMENT 8 Vin cen t Yu; Cyn thia Ste rn q uist ; Tom Ch av ez ; N anette Fish; Will iam Man; Bryan Co ok; Sc ott Re imers Objection on CUP to Esta b lish a KTV in Th e Ca mellia Squ are Sh opping Center Fo llow Up Monday, Se p tember 26, 201 6 5:22 AM Flagged The Ca m el l ia qu are Sho p p in g Center, 9055 Las T un as Drive. I w is h to m ake you aware of a number of stro ng o bjectio ns that I have w ith re g ard to th e pro posed Condi t io na l Use P e rmit to esta bli s h o f a 7 ,89 1 sq u a re foot ka raoke (KTV) in T he Cam e lli a Square 9055 Las Tunas Drive. As a n imm edi a te ne ig hbo r to the site o f the p ro p osed esta bli shme nt, I a m o f th e v iew tha t th e proposed d eve lo pme nt w ill h ave a seri o u s im pact o n o ur s ta nd a rd o f li v in g. My s pec ific o bj ecti o n s a r e as fo l lows: I . N o isy & nui san ce nei g h bors 2. Increas in g in c rime ra te 3. U nde rage drin k in g , s m o king 4 . Prostitutio n 5. Selling al coh ol wi tho ut lic e nse: Example of M a l-P racti ce Ka ra oke : Cash Box Karao ke in A rcadia (l ic ense revok e d b y C ity), L A Melody in Row land He ig hts (Multipl e ti c ket s by P o lice) I be li eve th e pro p osal to contravene this ni g ht life bus in ess as it is to the detrim e nt o f the qua lity, c h a racter and a me ni ty v a lu e of th e area, a s o utlined in t he po ints a b ove . T h e pro po sed s it e o f develo pme nt is a lso no t co mpl y in g w ith th e G e nera l Planning Advisory C ommittee Developm e nt Standard Suba rea 5 , Ka raoke as prima ry u se is NOT P E RM ITTED . I would be g ra te ful if th e counci l w o u ld ta ke o ur o bjecti o n s into co ns id e rat io n w he n dec iding this appli catio n . Si ncere ly, A nn a L i, Temple City res id e nt License revoked by City of Arcadia https://www .google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&cad = rja&uact=8&ved =OahUKEwj 1Sc76i6zPAhVFF2MKHQ- kANYQFghXMAg&url=https0/o3A0/o2F0/o2Fwww.arcadiaca.gov0/o2FHome0/o2FSho wDocument0/o3Fid 0/o3D6782&usg=AFQjCNGthZoMRI7DX4WDWwZDrLHB4UIOa g&sig2=nDDDXNrcdaXNbtAAHnvXCQ&bvm=bv .133700528,d .cGc Cash Box KTV, Arcadia 2 3 --------------------- LA Melody KTV, Rowland Heights 4 5 Subarea 5 Karaoke {primary use) not permitted, Temple City . -~ ........................... --- - --- Holel/mclel N c N c c c c c c Korooke orimorv "'e N N N N N N N N " Kennel/onlmol boadlng N N N ,, N N N N c Loundromoi/Dry Cteoners-e•cept cenuot " y " y y y G G y cteonlnq •ocililief 6 Subarea lo Mixsd-llsa 1.5 max FAR (minimum d 0.5 FAR oornme11ioij Residential Ont( 12 d!Voc Subarea lb Mixed-Use1 .5 max FAR (millimumd0.5 FAR c~<ioQ Canmerciol Oriy max 0.5 Subarea 2 Mixed-Usa 1.5 max FAR (minimum d 0.5 FAR c~cioij Residen1iol Ont( 12 d!Vor; Commercial Ontt max 0.5 Subarea 3 Canmerciol 0.5 max FAR Subarea 4 CommeiCiol 0.5 max FAR Subarea 5 Mixed-Use 2.0 max FAR (minimum d 0.5 FAR convnerclol) Canmerciol Only max 0. 5 Subarea 6 Mixed -Use 1.75 max FAR (mirimum of 0.5 FAR canme~cioij Canmerciol Oriy max 0 5 Subarea 7 Mixed-Usa 1.5 max FAR (minimum of 0.5 FAR umnertioQ Commercial Oriy max 0.5 ·- 7 Adam Gulick From : Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag : Flag Status: To Whom It My Concem : Da vi d So <davi dso829@yahoo.com> M onday, September 26, 2016 9:3 3 PM Vincent Yu; Cynthia Sternquist; Tom Chavez; N anette Fish ; W illiam Man; Bryan Cook; Brian Haworth; Tinny Chan ; Em ilia Kokayko; Matth ew Escobar; Scott Re imers Objections to having a karaoke busi ness Flag for follow up Completed The purpose of my letter is to have the c ity be aware of m y obj ections to h aving a karaoke business, in the peaceful neighborhood that I grew up in . The follo wing, in no particular o rder o f importance, are a few critical con cems and viewpoints that my family and I have: • Selling alcohol without a license, leading to o Underage drinking & smoking o Public intoxication • Increased noise level • Increased / h eavy traffic • Crime r a t e increase • Prostitution • Transients and loiterers We love our neighborhood and strongly believe a karaoke business would n egatively impact my family's quality of life. We hope our city can strongly take our though ts into consideration and not approve this project. Thank you for your time. David So 626-250-4367 Adam Gulick From: Sent: To: Subject: Judy Ton g <jtl end i ng2 2@aol.com> Tuesda y, September 27, 2016 3:33 PM Bryan Cook; Brian Haworth; Pegg y Kuo ; Adam Gulick; Tom Cha vez; Vincent Yu ; Cynthia Sternquist; Nanett e Fish ; Will iam Man KTV -Karaoke -Came ll ia square plaza Dea r Temp le City ma na ge r and Co un ci ls , I'm not ab le attend to n ig ht's m ee ting due t o persona l sc h edul e, I've lived in Temple City since 2005 and I have en j oye d th e quality env ironment, I would like to voice the below conce rn s, 1. The re w ere spo rts cars with (loud noises) runs up and down o n Ro semead Bl vd around after lOpm si nce Summer Roll Bar opened 2. I al so notice that City have bee n lack of code enforce ment patrol for Overnight parking vio lation, it have been reported but v io lat ion st i ll on? 2. Is it possible to ha ve the street li gh t on Myda Ave working again? It has been o ut for month s ... the st reet were dark and Kid s were re st, smoking and dran k beers left trash and beer cans on the st reet, this was happen ed on 9125, f irst time I'm asking Temple City to co nsider the impact n oise I food odor and potential crimes for the surrou nd ing r es id e nts and kin dly re -c ons ider and l imit to size restaurants I entertainment bu sin ess ... Your attention and support is truly appreciated, Resi dents fro m Myda Ave 626 -923 -4883 Se nt from my iPh o ne ATTACHMENT C City of Temple City Planning Commission St aff Report Sep t ember 27, 2016 FILE : PL 15-316 ADDRESS: 9055 Las Tunas Drive, Unit 125 DESCRIPTION : A conditiona l use permit to establish a 7,891 square foot karaoke television (KTV) business located in the Camellia Square shopping center. APPLICANT: C.C. Chang, C.C. Chang Consulting Services PROJECT PLANNER : Adam Gulick, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 (Existi ng Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION : Adopt the attached Re sol ution f i nding that the project is exempt from CEQA and denying File PL 15-316. SUMMARY: The appl icant's proposa l for a KTV business requires a conditional use permit. In reviewing the application, staff has iden t ified and analyzed the following issues : • Neighborhood Compatibility (Ope ration, Security, Noise) • Parking • Food and Dr ink Es t ablishment Limit for Camellia Square shopping center September 27 , 2016 Planning Commissio n Meeting File: PL 15-3 16 EXISTING CONDmONS: Cross Streets General Plan Designation Zoning Property Dimensions and Size Las Tunas Drive and Rosemead Boulevard Commercia l C-2, Genera l Commercial 321 fe et on Rosemead Boulevard and 490 feet on Las Tu nas Drive Current Use & Square Footage All four of the buildings in the shopping center have an approved Certificate of Temporary Completed Construct ion-a document acknowl edging that the exterior walls, or shell , of a building is complete. Porti ons of the shopping center are still under constructi on, with one tenant (Pokelicio us ) in Building 2 operating. Existing Entitlements Plann in g File 14-273: A modification to t he original conditional use permit for the Camell i a Sq uare sho pping ce nter to expand the all owed sq uare footage of food and drink establishment s from 11,000 square feet to 27,345 squa re f eet. Planning File 15-162: A conditional use perm it to establish a 3,320 sq uare foot drink and f ood establishment at 9055 Las Tunas Drive, Units 100-102 (Meet Fresh ). The approved hours of operation are Sunday through Thursday, from 11:00 a.m. to 11 :0 0 p.m. and Friday through Sat urday, from 11:00 a.m . to midnight. Planning File 15-219: A conditional use permit to establish a 5,32 0 square foot, full service re staurant wit h beer and wine service at 5700 Rosemead Boulevard, Unit 100 (Kang Ho Do Beak.Jeong, Korean Barbecue). Th e approved hours of operation are from 11 :30 a.m. to 2:00 a.m . Plann ing File 15-2 22: A conditio nal use pe rm it to establish a 1,710 square foot, fu ll serv ice restaurant with beer and wine at 5728 Rosemead Boulevard, Unit 100 (Summer Rolls ). The approve d hours of operatio n are from 10:00 a.m . to 10:00 p.m. Planning File 15 -23 1: A conditional use perm it to establish a 1,025 square foot food and drink establis hm ent at 5700 Rosemead Boulevard , Units 10 2-103 (Tea Station Exp ress). The approve d hours of operatio n are Sunday through Thursd ay, from 11:00 a.m. to 11 :00 p .m. and Frid ay through Sa t urday, from 11:00 a.m. to midn ight. Page 2 September 27, 2016 Planning Commissio n Meeting File: PL 15-316 Planning File 15-255: A conditional use permit to establish a 2,600 square foot food and drink establishment at 5728 Rosemead Boulevard, Unit 107 (Simmer Huang). The approved operating hours are from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. seven days a week . Planning Fi le 15 -266: A conditional use permit to establish a 7,110 sq uare foot full serv ice restaurant with beer and wine at 9055 Las Tuna s Drive, Unit 105 (Bistro Na's). The approved operating hours are from 11:00 a.m. to 11 :00 p.m. seven days a week . Planning File 15 -274: A conditional use permit to establish a 1,490 square foot estab li shment at 5728 Rosemead Boulevard, Unit 102 (Pokelicious ). The approved operating hours are from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday, and 11:00 a.m. to midnight Friday and Saturday. Planning File 15 -419: A cond itional use permit to establish a 4,518 square foot food and drink establishment with beer and wine service (Pappa Rich). The approved operating hours are from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday, and 11:00 a.m. to midnight Friday and Saturday. Existing Easements None Street Classification and Width The ma in driveways to the property are from Rosemead Boulevard, which has 80 feet of roadway, and Las Tuna s Drive, which has 110 feet of roadway, both of whic h are arterial streets. The site is also accessed from Sultana Avenue, which has 30 feet of roadway. Surrounding North R-1, Single Family Residentia l Neighborhood South C-2, General Commercial East East Commercial (EC) District of the Downtown Specific Plan West C-2, General Commercial Page 3 September 27, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting File: PL 15-316 PROPOS ED PROJECT INFORMATION : Project Description: The applicant is proposing a KTV establishme nt i n a 7,891 square foot unit locat ed in Build ing 1 (90 55 La s Tun as Dri ve); see Figure 1 below fo r the site pla n. Bui lding 1 is one of four b ui lding s located w ithin the shopping ce nter, and is the largest building positioned at t he northeast portio n of the site. Approved tenants for Bui lding 1 are Meet Fre sh (f ood es t ab lishmen t ), Bistro Na's (food establi sh ment), and MS Slim (beaut y and weig ht loss). The proposed KTV es t ab li shment would consist of a lobby area, utility room, office, food and drink preparation area , 19 private karaoke rooms, and two restrooms . Ea ch karaok e room would have a door cons isting of a glass pane l that is at least 50 percent of the door area. The proposed KTV establishment is d esigned with a maximum occu pancy load of 275 peop le. Each karaoke room would incl ude a television w ith a karaoke system and seating for 7 t o 16 people. Figure 1: Site Plan \ 'I '• I I I . w I ~ ~ I ~ Page 4 September 27 , 2016 Pl a nning Commission Meeting File: PL 15-316 Figure 2: Floor Plan ·~ I Pictures of Existing Site: 9055 La s Tuna s Drive, Building 1 -...... r N- ..... ~-.....-.---.,......__ Cl &_ .................... -.... - .:;o<l" • ·-~:.•:L· I l,l.\"Vti·A~ ...,.. .... i~·,-; :::.:.:;:"=-- ~ :X.._.. ~ u--• . , , / . ~ •. ()fiiOCr"t c .oeot:•n• .... FLOOR PLAN Unit's Front Entrance Page 5 Cll v c: ta ... ... c: U..l ... c: 0 ... u... September 27 , 2016 Planning Commissi on Meeting Fi le: PL 15-3 16 Un i t's Rear Elevation Ho use Behind Unit Rear Driveway Behind Unit Rear Driveway Behind Unit Ope rations: The applica nt indicated that t hey would rent private rooms to groups; KTV establishments typica lly rent rooms at an hourly rate. The applicant indicated that there would be no age restrictio ns. The applicant wou ld offer non-a lcoholic drinks (e.g ., soda, hot t ea, hot fruit tea, and fresh juice ), fresh fruit platters, and prepackaged snacks (e.g., potato chips, pea nu ts, sunflower seeds, mixed nuts, and dried fruit). The busi ness origina lly plann ed o n serv i ng bee r and wine (Type 41) to its customers, but th e Ca l ifornia Depa rtm ent of Alcoho l Beverage Control (ABC) informed t hem that the business does no t qua lify as a "bona fide pub lic eat ing p lace" because it does not ha ve a ful l kitche n; and t herefore can not app ly f or a Type 4 1 lice nse. The business in dicated t here wo uld be up to 20 emp loyees and five sec urity guards Thurs d ay th rough Sunday night, from 5:00 p.m. until closing time . The applicant is propos i ng to operate seven days a week , opening at 11:00 a.m. and closing at midnight Monday through Thursday with extended hours on Friday and Saturday night closing at 2:00 a.m . the following mornin g. ANALY SI S: A conditional use permit allows the City to analyze potentia l issues pertaining to the project and to min im ize or eliminate t he i mpacts throug h conditions of approva l. The following is a detailed analysis on the critical issues pe rta i ning to the proposed use: Page 6 September 27, 2016 Planning Commissio n Meeting File: PL 15-316 Neighborhood Compatibility: The properties directly north of the si t e are sing le-family residential, but are buffered by a n ine-foot tall decorat iv e fence and landscapi ng . These res ident ial properties are located on Myda Avenue, which is a cu l -de-sac with no access to the sho pping center. The site can be accessed via Sultana, which is also lined with sing le family houses on both sides of the street. The properties to the east, south, and west are commercial, primarily consisting of retail an d food uses. Most of the food and drink establishments in the shopp ing center are open until midnight on weekends, with the exception of the Korea n Barbecue, which was approved to operate until 2:00 a.m. seven days a week. Business Operation Staff researched other jurisdictions in the Sa n Gabriel Val ley to see if there were issues with existi ng KTV estab li shments. Staff found that many KTV businesses ha ve demonstrated a hi story of incidents requiring law enforcement service calls . The L.A. County Sheriff's Department provided service call reports from January 2014 through September 2015 for t he KTV location in Rowland He igh t s named Melody Karaoke that does not have an ABC license. Melody Karaoke had one incident of a fight that occurred outside the business and one incident where the security guard for the business was threatened by a customer. Despite not having an alcohol license, t here have been ca lls for service related to alcoho l. The alcohol related service calls incl ude an intoxi cate d femal e t hat was unab le to get into their friend's ve h icle, two incidents where a customer observed other patrons co nsuming alcohol in their private KTV rooms, an observat ion of customers drinking and smoking in the business, and one customer be i ng charged a fee for bringing in thei r own alcohol. The City of El Monte also provi ded information relat ing to service calls for their two KTV estab li shments on Lowe r Azu sa Road from June 2014 through September 2015 . One of the locations had a service ca l l f or an alcohol re lat ed incident requiring med ic al attention, two service calls for fighting , and two service calls relating to automobile accidents. On May 10, 2016, the City of Arcadia Plan ni ng Commission revoked a bus in ess li cense for a KTV estab li shment (Cas h Box KTV) that received entitlements in 1991. Th e en titlement f rom 1991 origi nally allowed Cash Bo x to serve alcohol, but their ABC license was re voked in 1992. The City of Arcadia cited in their staff report three main reasons that the bu siness license should be revoke d -the business was operating past their approved business hours; th e busine ss had cooking facilities and was serving food without necessary fi re /building/heal th department approvals; alcohol was being served to customers; and customers were allowed to bring in their own alcohol. Staff also requested comments from the Sher iff's Department regard ing the proposal. Temple Station staff spoke with deputies from other stations that have KTV businesses in their ju ri sd iction. The Sheriff's Department exp ressed concerns with the mu ltipl e smal l rooms combined w ith this type of business attracting you nger crowds. They also expressed concerns with these types of businesse s resulting in servic e calls for underage drinking and/or illegal alcohol sales, drug use, prostitution, fights, noise, and public intoxication. Page 7 September 27, 20 16 Planning Commissio n Meeting File : PL 1 5-316 The applicant is req ues ti ng t o operate on Friday and Sa t u rday night until 2:00 a.m. (Saturday and Su nd ay morning) simil ar t o operating hou rs for a bar, even t hough custome rs wi ll not have alcoho l service. The neig hbors on Myda Avenue appea led the Planni ng Commiss io n's decis ion for the Korea n Barbecue estab lis hment to ope rate seven days a week until 2:00a.m. The resi dents expressed co nce rn s with th e business fu nctioni ng as a bar, in st ea d of a restau rant. Th e City Counci l subseque nt ly uphe ld th e Plan ning Comm iss io n's d ecision for th e Ko rea n Bar bec ue busi ness to o pera t e until 2:00 a.m. seve n d ays a week ci t ing that th e nearest reside nce is ove r 300 fee t away. The City Co un ci l also noted t hat t here is a parking lot , a nin e-foot t all wa ll , and a t wo-story buil d ing be twee n t he Korean Barbecue l ocat ion and t he resi d ential properties. The rear o f t he KTV bus in ess is on ly 60 f ee t away from t he closes t residentia l bu ilding t o the north and does not benefit fro m a t wo-story build ing , which can act as a buffer. Given t he nu mber of incidents f rom other KTV bus inesses in the area, staff has conce rn s with t hese alcohol relate d service calls and t he effects on the adj acent residential properties, especially durin g lat e night an d ear ly morning hours. Secu rity The applicant originally proposed only o ne sec urity guard Thu rsday through Su nday from 5:00 p.m. un t il closing time. Staff expressed co nce rn s wi t h having only o ne security gua rd and fo ur KTV empl oyees (sta t ed in their bu siness desc ri ption) fo r a 7,89 1 squ are foot KTV busi ness t hat has a max imum occupancy load of 275 and a de monstrated history of problems. Base d o n t he floor pla n and the re qu irement s of the Bui l di ng Code, t here cou ld be up to 22 6 customers in t he private KTV roo ms with an ad d itional 40 in th e lobby area . To address staff's co nce rn s, th e app li can t provide d a secu ri ty plan from a secu ri ty bu siness describing t he j o b duties for two sec urity gua rds at t he KTV location. Staff reviewed resolu t ions f o r recently approved KTV locations in Sa nta Ana and Freemont. The City of Santa Ana required one sec u rity guard pe r 100 customers, and th e City of Freemont required o ne secu ri ty guard for the f i rs t 100 cu stomers and one additional sec u rity guard for ea ch additiona l 75 customers. Both jurisd ictions also required that the securi t y o ffi ce rs need to be licensed by the sta t e and wear a uniform that easily identifies t hem as a security guard. Additiona ll y, the City of Sa nta Ana requires that the sec uri t y guards were req ui re d t o use rad io fre qu ency and comm u nication equipme nt. Upo n further researc h, staff discovered some j urisdictions t ha t re q ui re a ratio of one security guard f or every 50 customers . After f urther disc ussio n w it h the appl i ca nt, t hey informed staff that they wo uld provid e five security guard s an d 20 KTV empl oyees Thu rsday th roug h Su nday from 5:00 p.m. unt il clos in g ti me. St aff also has some conce rn s wi th the layo ut of the bus i ness. St aff be lieves the l obby area could be redesigned to provide more visibility down th e main hallway. From a safety standpoint, it is preferred whe n law enforceme nt is responding to a serv ice call that t hey have a clear line of sight into t he business. Page 8 September 27, 201 6 Planning Commission Meet i ng File : PL 15-316 Noise The closest residence i s approximately 60 f eet from the rear wall of the KTV establishment. The proposed commercia l unit would not have an exterior door (or a window) that directly opens to the rea r driveway of the shopp ing center, previously the loading dock area f or Building 1. The "rear exit" for the unit opens to a service corridor/hallway that will also be utilized by the adjacent t enant to the eas t. Although it is un like ly that the adjacent resi dences wil l be able to hear noise from th e KTV rooms since they will ha ve soun d insul ati on, staff has co ncern s with employees and/or custo mers loitering in the area behind the unit. Staff also sees potent ial is sues with employees (o r customers) leaving doors ope n in the service corrido r that would result in noise spilling over into the adjacent residentia l neighborhood. The use has similar opera ting hours as a bar, so staff also has concerns with noise impacts on the residents in the area from customers congregating outside the establishment an d vehicles exiting the site, especially late at night. Parking: As with any intensification of use (c hanging a tenant space to a use that requires more parking), staff analyzed what kind of parking impacts the new use wou ld have f or the shopping center. The applicant provided a parking demand ana lysis as requested by City staff to determine the parki ng requirement for t he KTV establishment si nc e th e City does not have a specific parking standard for this t ype of business. The applicant retai ned the servic es of Linscott, Law, and Greenspan (LLG ) Traffic Engineers to prepare a parking demand ana lysis of existing KTV facil ities in the area (Attachment 3). The parking demand ana lys is demo nst rates t he hourly parking demand for KTV locations in Rowlan d Heig hts, Los Angeles, and Fu llerton. The study demonstrates that 7 parking spaces per 1,000 sq uare feet of building area is the average of the t hree KTV locations during the weekend peak parking period (Melody KTV 4.56 parking spaces/1,000 sq.ft., SoopSok Karaoke 7.92 parking spaces/1,000 sq.ft., and Zi ll er Karaoke Bar 8.99 parking spaces/1,000 sq.ft.). LLG concludes that the business would require 8.9 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of bui lding area during peak hours, or 70.23 park ing spa ces. The property owner hired their own traffic engin eer, Kunzman Associates , Inc. (Kunzman) to provide an analysis (Attachment 4) to determine if the shopping center has sufficient parking to accommodate the proposed KTV establish ment. Kunzman 's parking study provides an analysis of the approved food and drink estab li shme nts, proposed KTV estab li shment, and remaining building area as office/retai l. Kun zman's parking st udy used for their ana lysis the parking ratio of 7.7 parking spaces per 1,000 sq uare feet for the KTV business from LLG 's park ing study, explai ning t hat the 8.9 pa rking spaces per 1,000 sq uare feet was for a standalone KTV es tabli shment that offered meals and alcoholic beverages, and was the smallest out of the th ree surveyed. Kunzman arrived at the 7.7 parking rati o by using the average 7 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet from the LLG study, plus an additional 10 percen t overage as a conserva tive estimate for the parking requirement for a KTV tenant. Using the food and drink es ta blishments with entitlements, office/retai l area , and the proposed KTV , Kun zman analyzed the shopping center using the Urba n Land Institute's Shared Parking, ;znd Edition for employee/resident and customer/visitor/guest parking. Kunzman's rep ort provides a detailed analysis of park i ng demand throughout the day, during th e week and weekend, and by month of all the approved tenants for the site and the previous ly approved uses for spaces not yet leased . Kunzman 's ana lysis determ i ned that there would be a surp lus of 50 parking spaces during the highest peak parking period, whi ch is in December during t he weekend lunch hours. Even using the higher parking ratio of 8.9 parking space s Page 9 September 27 , 2016 Planning Commissio n Meeti ng File: PL 15 -316 per 1,000 square feet for the KTV business, preferred by staff and recommended by LLG, there would stil l be a surp lu s of 40 parking spaces. Food and Drink Establishment Limit for the Camellia Square shopping center: Although the proposed floor plan gives the appearance of a kitchen, this area is required by the hea lth department since the business is preparing fresh fruit platters and fresh fruit juice. The applicant has indicated that there will only be prepackaged food (e.g., potato chips, peanuts, sunflower seeds , mi xed nuts, and dried fruit) and no cooking facilities are shown on the floor p lan. Sin ce the primary function of the bus iness is the renta l of private KTV rooms and the sale of drinks and food is ancillary to the primary use , staff determined that the business should not be counted towards the ma ximum food and drink area approved for the shopp in g center under the conditiona l use permit. FINDINGS : The findin gs required in Section 9-1F-11 of the Temple City Municipal Code for a conditional use permit are contained in the attached reso lution (At tachment 1). Staff believes that the required findings cannot be made, as the proposed business wou ld have an "adverse effect upon the use, enjoyment or va luation of adjacent or ne ighboring properties or upon the publ ic we lfa re " for the rea sons des cribed in the analysis . ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facil ities) of the CEQA Guid eline s. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached Reso lution finding that t he project is exempt f rom CEQA and denying File PL 015 - 316 . ATTACHMENTS : 1. Planning Commission Re solution 2. Reduced Site Plan and Floor Plan 3. LLG Parking Dema nd Analysi s dated May 16, 2016 4. Kunzman Pa rk ing Study dated June 30, 2016 5. Photographs of site 6. Aerial Photo and Land Use Map Page 10 ATTACHMENT 1 m PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION • City of Temp le City Resolution 16-24 PC Fi le No. 15-316 905 5 Las Tunas Drive, Unit 125, Temp le City, Ca lifornia 91780 A RESOLUTION OF THE TEMPLE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO AL LOW THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A 7 ,89 1 SQUARE FOOT KARAOKE TELEVISION (KTV) BUSINESS IN THE CAMELLIA SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 9055 LAS TUNAS DRIVE , UNIT 125. SECTION 1. The Planning Commi ss ion ha s co nsi d ere d all of the evidence submitted into the ad m in istrative record w hi ch includ es but i s n ot limited t o: 1. Reports and prese ntations of projec t re lated data and analysis prepared by the Community Deve lopment Departm en t ; an d 2. Th e Temple City Municipa l Code, Genera l Plan, Subdivisio n Map Act, a nd a ll other appli cab le regulation s and co d es; and 3. Pub lic co mments, both w ritten a nd oral, rece ived or su bmitted at or prior to the public h ea ring; a nd 4. Test i mony and comments submitted by th e app li ca nt a nd rep rese ntatives in both writt e n and oral fo rm at o r p ri or to the public h ea rin g; and 5. All other related documents rec e ived or submitted at or pri or t o the pu bli c hearing . SECTION 2. Th is re so lution is made w ith ref erence to the fo llow ing prefacing facts as more fu ll y set forth in th e adm in istrat ive record: 1. On October 28, 20 15, the app li can t submitted the app li cat ion. 2. On Ju ly 14, 2016, th e app li ca tio n was deemed co mplete. 3. On August 9, 20 16, th e Pl an ning Commi ssio n cont inu ed th e ite m to September 27, 20 16. 4. O n Se ptember 27, 20 16, th e Pl anning Commission held a public hearing to cons id er the appli cation. Resolution No. 16-24_ PC Fi le 15-316 9055 Las Tunas Drive, Un i t 125 Page 2 of4 5. No tice o f th e Pl a n n i ng Com miss ion p u b li c hearin gs we re pos t ed at the Co u nci l Chambers. 6. Notice of t he Planning Comm ission public hearing s were pub l is hed in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten days prior to the heari ng. 7. Notice of t he Planning Commission public hea r ing s were mai led to property owners wi thi n 500 feet of t he property at least ten days prior to t h e hea ring. 8. Notice of th e p u blic hea r ing sat isf ied the notici ng req ui reme nts se t forth m Government Code Sections 65090 and 65091. 9. The project site is zoned C-2, Heavy Commercial. 10. The project si t e is desig nated Commercial by the General Plan . SECTION 3 . Based u po n a publ ic hea rin g fo r the Con di t ional Use Perm it, the Planning Co m miss io n f inds: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size, shape, topography and circumstances; and The subject site contains 81,469 square feet of building area on 159,521 square feet of land a rea . The request is to establis h a 7,891 square foot karaoke television (K TV ) b u siness i n Bu i lding 1, an existing building , of the Camell ia Square shop pin g center. Two parki ng stu dies f o r t he proposed KTV business and the shopp i ng center were prepare d by professio nal traffic enginee rs. The parking studies co ncluded that there is adequate parki ng for the approved food and drink establ ishments, proposed KTV business, and the remaining commercial space area as office/retail. Therefore, the project meets this finding. 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways, adequate in width and pavement type to ca rry the quantity a nd qual ity of t raffic generated by the proposed use; and The proposal to establish a new 7,891 squa re foot KTV business in the shopping cente r that has access from Rosemead Boulevard (v ia Elm Avenue), La s Tunas Dri ve, and Sultana Avenue. The applicant has provided park i ng studies from professional traffic engineers il lu strating that the shopping center ha s sufficient Resolutio n No. 16-24_ PC Fi le 1 5-316 9055 Las Tunas D rive, Unit 125 Page 3 of 4 parking in the shopping ce nte r t o serve the ex i sting uses and the a KTV bu sin ess. Th e result of the pa rking survey show that th ere w ill be surpl us of 50 pa rking spaces. The vehicle vol ume le ve l on Las Tun as Drive a nd Rosemead Boulevard are so high the added trips wo uld be negligible. Th erefo re, the project meets this finding. 3. That the proposed use will have an adverse effect upon the use, enjoyment or valuation of adjacent or neighboring properties or upon the public welfare. The p roposa l to es t ab li sh a new KTV business in Camellia Square shopping ce nte r is no t co mpatible with th e surrounding neighborhood. Th e proposed comme rcial unit is only 60 feet away from the neares t residence. Ba se d upon review o f law enforcement reports from t he City of El Monte, Ci t y of Arcadia, and Rowland He ights (Unin co r porat ed L.A. Co unty), ex isting KTV businesses generate alco hol related serv ice ca lls (e.g., intoxicated customers, cus t o mers bringing in their own alcohol , bus in esses serving alcoh o l without necessary approva ls, custo m ers fighting , and cu stomers threatening sec urity guards). Additionally, th e L.A. Coun t y Templ e Stat io n ex pressed similar concerns wi th issues w ith th e business and its common attraction to illegal act ivities (i.e., underage drinki ng, drug use, prostitution, noise, et c.). Sta ff believes that the business location being on ly 60 f ee t away from the nearest residence w ill have an adve rse effect on th e neighboring res id ent ial prope rti es. The propo se d hours of operation Thursday thro ug h Sa turd ay night (open until 2:00a.m. the f o ll owin g morning) are sim i la r to a ba r ope ration. Staff may have a different opin i on if the proposed KTV bu si ne ss were loca t ed further away from residential properties in a commerc ial unit along Las Tunas Dri ve or Ro semead Bou l evard (Bu ild ing 3 or 4 in this shopp ing cente r), or loca t ed in the Temple City Pl aza (K-Mart shopping center). Du e to the bus iness being o nl y 60 feet away from the nearest residence a nd numerous service calls for other KTV location s in the San Gabrie l Valley, staff be l ieves that the KTV business w ill have a n effect on the sur rounding properties. Therefore, the p roject doe s not meet thi s finding. SECTION 4. Thi s project is found to have no si gn ifican t effects upon t he environme nt a nd is Categoricall y Exe mpt from env ironmenta l review pursuant to Section 1530 1 of the CEQA Gui del ine s. Re solution No. 16-24_ PC File 15-316 9055 Las Tunas Drive, Uni t 125 Pag e 4 of4 SECTION 5. Ac co rdingly, the Plann ing Commi ss ion denies Fil e PL 15-316, a req uest for a Conditiona l Use Pe rmit to estab lish a 7,891 squa re foot KTV bu siness. SECTION 6 . Th e Sec retary shall certify to the adoption of thi s Re so lution. Planning Commission Ch a ir City Attorney I he reby ce rtify that th e foregoing Reso lution wa s adopted by th e Planning Commiss io n of the Ci t y of Temple City at a m eeting he ld on t h e 27th of Septembe r, 20 16, b y t he fo ll ow ing vote: YE S: NO: ABSENT: AB STAIN : Com miss ioner- Com miss ion er- Commiss ioner- Comm iss ioner- Secretary ________________________ A_T_T_A_C_H_M __ E_N _T _2 ~ SITE PLAN AND FLOOR PLAN ~~~ ... . w I ~ I ~ I ~ -r- SITE PLAN -...... ......... PROJECT SUMMARY TOT .. "-~..,.,.. :...MeT ~ """"""'"""" TYI"tt:-~M.e~ ) ~TAeLE • "'""'D-&- ~ DOUBLE OYER S+ELF .. COFFEE MAKER , WATE!O I!!OILE!O & fCE MAKER ~ lOCKER 10 STORAGE SHE LF II WA TER HEATE R 11 MOP s rNK • . -~O.L -Q - 0 ~~~"*"'*"'~··-··· _ I 0 1-R~ .. "'a:&.l~'·.:;...~........... ~ I I I 0 I!> .. L EGEND cam vcn LOOIT ~ .,.,,~ 5ACXIr' r;:::;J ~LIGIJlllf .... rtllln'~ CD 00011 !U'!DIIt LoeeY 660 !#I et • 4<40.1.. .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...I ~ 3 () ~ ~ ~ ~ z: g 1 I i= ct ~ ...I 0.. 1:! ATTACHMENT 3 m LLG PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS • MEMO RAN DUM To: From : Mr. Adam G uli ck C it y ofTemple C ity , Co mmun ity Deve lo pment Depa rtm en t-Plannin g Divi s io n Date: May 16,20 16 C lare M. Look-Jaeger, P.E. ~-~LLGRet: 1-16-4 156-1 C h in S. Tain g, PTP C5f LLG Eng in eers Subject: Revised Parkin g Deman d A nal ys is for the 9055 Las Tun as Dri ve - Karaoke/KTV Proj ect, Ci ty ofTem p le Ci ty, Ca li fo rni a T hi s memorand um has been prepared to s umm ari ze th e parkin g dem and ana lys is assoc iated w ith th e pro posed occ up ancy of a ka raoke/KTV e nt erta inm ent estab li shment w ithin o ne of th e bui ld in gs within t he Ca me ll ia Squ a re sho ppin g ce nt er (th e "Cent er'") loca ted at th e north east co rn e r of Rosemead Bo ul eva rd /Las T un as Driv e in the C ity o f Te mp le C it y, Ca liforni a . T hi s pa rkin g assessme nt is re quired by the C ity in order to demon st rat e t he ade qu acy of th e entire Cent e r 's park in g suppl y to accommodate t hi s uniqu e, proposed use whi c h is not id e ntifi ed wit hi n t he Ci ty's Municipal Code . We und e rsta nd th at th e ka rao ke/KTV es tab li s hm ent w ill occ upy a tenant s pace w ithin the Center, tota lin g 7,891 gross squ are feet of fl oo r area w ith up to 18 se parate karaoke/KTV roo ms. T hi s ana lys is was prepa red so th at a dete rmin at ion co u ld be made as to th e adequa cy o f the rece ntl y co nstructed parki ng s uppl y to meet the a nti c ip ated s it e-w ide pe ak parkin g demand fo ll owing occup a ncy by th e proposed project. T he me morand um provid es a rev iew of the fo ll ow in g: • A desc ripti on of th e proposed s ite co ndit ions, includ in g a rev iew of th e site- wide park in g supp ly; • Off-str ee t parkin g requirement s a ppli cable to th e proj ec t s ite pursuant to th e City of T e mpl e C it y Mu n icipa l Code; • A review of th e o bse rved weekday and weekend day parkin g dem a nd at oth er ka rao ke/KTV estab li shm ent s (i .e., t hro ugh the cond uct of s it e- s pec ifi c/e mpir ica l s urveys); • A determi nat ion of t he empirica l week day and weeke nd peak pa rkin g de mand ratios fo r karaoke/KTV uses based on th e s urvey s co nducted ; • A fo reca st of the peak park in g de mand for the proposed karaoke/KTV proj ect base d on ap p li cati on of th e empiri ca l (derived) parki ng de mand rati o; • A co nc lu s io n regarding the adeq uacy of th e o n-s it e pa rk in g sup ply to accom modate th e fo recast s ite-w ide f uture peak park in g dema nd . 0 JOB HU: 'I '6 memo J I C<f,-\ I ~ do ... Eng ineers & Pl anners Traffic Transportati on Parki ng Linscott. Law & Greenspan. Engineer~ 600 S. Lake Avenue Suite 500 Pasade na, CA 91106 6Z6. 796.2322 T 626.792.0941 F wv.w.llgengineers .com Pa sa dena Irvi ne San Diego Woodland Hills YE ARS 1 9 66 -20 1 6 Mr. A d a m G uli c k May 16,20 16 Page 2 Project Setti ng and Parking Supply The pro posed Ka rao ke/K T V estab li shm e nt is pl a nn e d to occ up y a te na nt s pace w ith in o ne of th e fo ur bu il dings w ithin th e Cam e llia Squa re sho pping center (''Cente r"). The address w ill be 905 5 Las Tun as Dri ve, wh ic h is located a t th e no rt heas t corn e r of Rosem ead Bo u levard /Las T un as Dri ve in th e C ity of Templ e C ity, Cali fo rni a . T he pro posed proj ect s ite and gene ra l v ic inity is illu s trate d in Figure 1. The te na nt s pace is pl a nn e d to b e located w ithin Bu il d in g I a nd to t a ls 7,8 9 1 g ross squ a re feet o f fl oor area and w i II prov id e up t o 18 se pa ra te ka rao ke/KTV roo m s . T he pro p osed karaoke/K T V esta bl ishm e nt is ex pec ted to o nl y serve packaged s nack s a nd fre s h f ruit pl a tte rs with no n-a lco ho lic be ve rages (i.e., ju ices, bo tt le d dri n ks, e tc .). T he hours of o perati o n for th e proposed ka ra o ke/KTV use is a nticipa te d to be I I :00 AM to 12 :00 A M midnig ht, M o nd ays throu g h T hursd ays, a nd 11 :00 AM to 2 :00 A M, Fridays thro ug h Sundays. O ccupa n cy of th e project is a nti c ip a te d in year 2 01 6 . The proposed p roject s it e p la n is sh own in Figure 2 . Based o n s it e plan info rm a ti on prov id e d by th e Proj ect Appli cant, a t ota l o f 394 pa rkin g s paces (2 74 sta nd a rd s paces, I 06 compact s paces, a nd 14 ha n d ica p access ibl e s paces) have been recentl y co nstru c te d o n -s ite, w ith on e a t-g ra d e p a rking le ve l ( 127 s paces) a nd o ne be lo w-g rad e pa rking le ve l (267 s p aces) to accomm o da te th e e nt ire Cente r. For p a rkin g fa c iliti es th a t ra n ge between 30 I a nd 400 t ota l s p aces, th e Ame ri ca n w ith D isa b ili t ies Act (A DA) re qui re me nt is a minimum o f e ight (8) ha ndica p access ible s p aces, wi th a minimum o f two (2) s paces be in g va n access ibl e. T he Cent e r prov ides a t o ta l o f 14 ha ndi ca p accessi b le spaces (two o f w h ic h a re va n acc essibl e spa ces) w hi c h exceed s th e ADA re qu ire m e nt. In accordance w ith th e 20 I 0 C a li fo rn ia G reen B u il din g Code, th e Cente r w ill a lso p rov id e s ix (6) e lectri c ve hi c le c harg in g spaces a nd 40 fu e l effi c ie nt ve hi c le spaces w hi c h sati s fi es the standards id e nti fie d in Ta bl e A5 .1 0 6.5.3.1 a nd T ab le A5.1 06.5.1.1 o f the Cod e, res p ecti ve ly . City of Temple C ity Code Parking R equire ments Th e C ity of Temp le C ity M uni c ipa l Code in c lu des pa r k ing re qui re m e nts fo r t he vari o us la nd use compo ne nts as set fo rth in S ecti o n 9 -I.J-2 o f the Mu n ic ipa l Code . In a c cordance w ith th e Muni ci p a l Code pa rkin g regul atio ns, th e fo ll ow in g pa rkin g require m e nt h as be en identifi ed fo r th e e ntire s ho pping cente r: • Shopp in g Cente rs > 75 ,0 0 0 G S F -1.0 sp ace fo r every 25 0 squa re feet of g ross fl oor a rea. L IN')!' Oi l LAW & G RE Etl S PM. t • ,, u i 11 t' t"' , ·~ Mr. Adam Gulick May 16,20 16 Pa ge 3 Ba sed o n info rmati o n pr ovided by the Proj ec t App li ca nt and stri ct app li cati o n of th e Code requirements for the ent ire s ho ppin g cen te r, a tota l of 326 spa ces a re required for the Cente r as s ummari zed bel ow : S ho pping Center : 81,469 GSF x 1.0 s pace/250 GSF = 32 6 spa ces Total C ity Code Required Pa rkin g fo r Shopp in g Cent e r = 326 s pace s Havin g stated th e above requi re ment , it is recog ni zed that th e Ci ty Code docs not co nt a in off-street parkin g requirement s s pec ifi ca ll y fo r karaoke/KTV e nt erta inm ent uses or other s imi lar entertainment es tabli s hm e nt s and as suc h the pa rkin g requiremen t of l.O space for eve ry 250 squ are feet of gross floor area for kar aoke/KTV use wa s applied for purp oses of determinin g the Code pa rkin g requ irement fo r the entire Center as a who le. As noted a bove, off-s tre et parkin g requirem ents fo r spec ifi c uses in c ludin g kar ao ke/KTV entertainm en t uses are not included in the Muni c ipa l Code . Acc ordin gly, an e mpiri cal parkin g demand study o f ex ist in g comparabl e fac ilit ies th at are s imil a r in nature (i.e., s it e locat ion, de mog raphi cs, fac ilit y a meniti es, e tc .) to th e pr o posed project ha s been prepa red in o rd e r to dete rmine th e adequa cy o f th e pr oj ec t 's planned parking s uppl y to meet th e expected park in g demand. Empirical Parking Demand Studies of Existing Karaoke/KTV Facilities The primary purpose of th e fo ll ow in g ana lys is is to confirm the peak parking de mand rati os at oth er ex ist in g karaoke/KTV fac iliti es that a re s imil ar in nature to the propose d project facili ty s in ce spec ifi c off-stree t parkin g requ ir eme nt s for karaoke/KTV fac iliti es are no t id e ntifi ed in th e Municipa l Code. Accordingly, an e mpiri ca l parkin g demand stud y o f ex istin g co mpa rab le fac iliti es that are s imi la r in nat ur e (i.e., s ite location , de mograp hi cs , fa c ility a me nities, etc.) to the pro posed proj ect ha s been prepared in o rd e r to determin e th e adequacy of th e project 's parkin g s upp ly to meet the expected parkin g demand . The s ite s were selected after coo rdinati on wit h both the Project App lica nt tea m an d the City of Temp le C ity Depattm e nt of Co mmunity Deve lo pmen t s ta ff to e ns ure that the s ur vey s ites are comparable to what is be in g propo sed at the Cent er. The ex istin g fac ilities c hosen fo r th e e mpiri ca l pa rkin g de ma nd stud y we re ba se d o n the foll owin g facto rs : • S ite Loca tion: The exi s tin g fac il it ies are located alo ng the fronta ge of a maj o r a rterial. w ith sa mpl e s it es fr o m a s ho ppin g ce nte r settin g a nd a sta nd -a lone s ite wit h dedicated parkin g . • Demograph ics: Loc a l co mmunity po pul ati on and eco no mi c cond iti o ns are fa irl y s imil ar to th e C ity o fTempl e C it y . l I N \1 0 T 1 LA W & G R E E tl <, P fllj t 'll tl : ",.. t '' Mr. Adam Gulick May 16,20 16 Page 4 • Fa c ilit y Ameniti es: The ex ist in g fac iliti es provi de s imil ar types of se rvi ces (e.g., karaoke/KTV entertainmen t rooms. packaged snacks and non-alco holic beve rages se rve d at o ne of the sur veyed s ites. etc .) to th ose planned at the proposed project. Based o n coord in at io n wit h th e Project App licant team and C ity staff as we ll as s ub se quent fi e ld rev iew s of ex istin g fac il ities by LLG staff, th e fo ll owin g t hree ex istin g karaoke/KTV fa c iliti es were se lected for th e pa rkin g demand stud y, as show n in Figure 3: • Melody KTV loca ted at 18888 Labin Co urt , unincorporated Rowland He ights area of Co unty of Los Angeles (6,800 gross square feet o f fl oor area) • SoopSok Karaoke located at 4070 West 3rd Street, C ity of Lo s Ange les (6,566 gross sq ua re feet of flo or area) • Zill er Karao ke Bar located at I 06 1 We st Va le nc ia Drive , C ity of Fullerton (5 ,34 0 gross square feet of fl oo r a rea) It sho uld be no ted that a lth o ug h bot h the SoopS ok Karaoke and Z ill er Karaoke Ba r s it es serve food and alcoholic beverages, th ese s it es were in c lud ed as the se s tand- a lone facilities have o n-s ite parki ng dedi cated onl y for karaoke/KTV use. The Melody KTV si te is more comparab le to the prop osed proj ec t in term s of locati o n and use s in ce it se rv es packaged snacks and no n-a lcoho li c beverages on ly and is located within a sho pping ce nt e r with a mixture o f other retail and restaurant estab lis hm e nt s. The hours of o perati on for th e Melody KTV s ite are a lso more co mp ara bl e to th at proposed for th e project as th e other two s tand-alone s ite s o pen later in th e afte rn oo n (i.e., after 5:00 PM) wh ereas the Melody KTV s ite o pens in the ea rl y afternoo n (i.e., at 2 :00PM). Pa rki ng acc umu latio n su rveys and in bound/outbo und patron o bse rvations we re co ndu cted at the above three faci lit ies dur ing one weekday and o ne weeke nd da y (Sa tu rday) by a traffic count firm (The T raffic Solution). The parking su rveys were co ndu cted in ho url y in c rements base d o n respective o pening hours to 12:00 PM midn ight for each of th e t hree s ites dur in g a typica l v eekday and weeke nd da y (i.e .. 2:00PM to 12:00 midn ight for Melody KTV s ite, 6:00 PM to 12:00 PM mi dnig ht for SoopSok Karaoke s ite , and 5:00 PM/7:00 PM to 12:00 PM m id n ig ht fo r Zill er Karaoke Bar). T he se days a nd tim e peri ods were se lected so as to ca pture th e peak faci li ty usage pe r iods based o n the ex ist in g hou rs of ope rati o n at the se s ite s. As the Melody KTV s it e is located wit hin a large r shoppi ng center s etting (s im il ar to the pr o posed project), th e in bound /outbound patron o bserva ti ons were con ducted in orde r to estimate the pa rkin g dema nd a nd durat ion fo r th e sta y . Based on th e o bse rva ti ons. it was assumed that th e du rati o n fo r each stay was approx im ate ly two hours in lengt h. 0 JO B HLI· ..tl.._t, n!fl'V .11'\f.,\11 Jm: Mr. Adam G uli ck May 16,2016 Page 5 T he parking accu mulatio n for th e t hree exi s tin g fac i lit ies is s umma ri z ed in Table 1. A s s hown in Tab le 1, dur ing t he weekd ay an d weeke nd time perio d s, a ll three s urveyed faci liti es we re observe d to experi e nce their highest demand fo r parking during th e late even ing tim e pe ri od. As expected , the observed weekend pa rkin g demand fo r a ll three s ite s is greater th a n the weekday co nditi ons, a s these u se s genera ll y e x peri e nce hi g he r parking demand s during the weekends . Tt s hou ld be n oted that du rin g other time pe riod s of the day a nd other days o f th e week, a greater parking s ur p lu s is ex pected for these karaoke/KTV use s. T h e weekda y a nd weekend peak parking demands for eac h of the s urveyed sites are s umm a ri z ed below: Weekda y Peak Parki n g De m a nd • Melod y KTV -27 spaces utilized (42 .2 %) at II :00 PM • SoopSok Karaoke -15 s paces uti l iz e d (31.3 %) a t 9:00 PM, I 0 :00PM • Z iller Ka raoke Bar -18 s pa ces uti lized (29.0%) at I I :00 PM Weekend (Saturday) Peak Park in g Demand • Me lod y KTV -3 1 spaces o ccup ie d (48.4%) a t 8:00PM • SoopSok Karaoke -52 s pac es o ccup ied (I 00.0%) at II :00 PM • Z ill er Karaoke Bar -48 s paces occupi ed (77.4%) 10 :00 PM Derived Site-S pecific Karaoke/KTV Parking Demand R a tio s Ba sed o n t he obser ved p eak parking demand and the g ro ss flo o r are a fo r each o f s ur veyed karaoke/KTV fac ili tie s, the s ite-s pec ific weekday and weekend peak parking d e mand rat ios for karaoke/KTV u ses wa s derive d. T h e de r ived s ite-s pecific weekday a nd weekend peak parking demand ra ti o s fo r each of the three s ites are summari z ed a s fo ll ows . De ri ved We ekday Peak Pa rk in g De mand Ra ti os • Melody KTV -27 s paces/(6 ,800 GSF/1,000) = 3 .97 s paces/1,000 GSF • Soo pS o k Karaoke-15 s p aces/(6,566 GSF/1 ,000) = 2.28 s paces/J ,000 GSF • Z ill er Karaoke Bar -18 s pa ces/(5,340 GSF/1 ,000) = 3 .37 s pacesll ,000 GSF Derive d We eke nd Peak Pa rki ng Dem a nd Ratios • Me lo dy KTV -3 1 s paces/(6 ,800 GSF/1 ,000) = 4 .5 6 s paces/! ,000 GSF • Soo pS o k Karaoke -52 s p ace s/(6,566 GSF/1 ,000) = 7.92 s pace s/J ,000 GSF L i th\ Oll LA \'> & G RF E W>PM. t~ II II I ;.t •' t ' ' ·-. Mr. Adam Gu li ck May 16 ,20 16 Page 6 • Z ill er Kar ao ke Bar -48 spaces/(5 ,340 GSF/1,000) = 8.99 spaces/1,000 GSF Th e range of th e weekday peak parking demand ratio s fo r th ese fac ilit ies was between 2 .28 spaces/ I ,000 GSF and 3.97 spaces/ I ,000 GSF. In add iti on, the average weekday pe a k parkin g demand ratio for the three s urve ye d faci litie s is 3.2 1 s pa ces/ I ,000 GSF (i.e., [2 7 spaces + 15 spaces + 18 s pac es] I [(6,800 GSF + 6,566 GSF + 5,3 40 GSF)/ I ,000]) = 60 spaces/[ 18,706 GS F I I ,000] = 3.2 1 s paces/ I ,000 GSF). The ra nge of the weeke nd (Saturday) peak parkin g demand ratio s for t hese fac iliti es was betwee n 4.56 s paces/1 ,000 GSF a nd 8.99 spaces/1,000 GSF. In add iti o n, the ave rage weekend (Sat urd ay) peak parking dema nd rat io for th e three s urveyed fac ili ties is 7.00 spaces/1,000 GSF (i.e ., [3 1 s paces + 52 s paces + 48 spaces] I [(6 ,800 GSF + 6,566 GSF + 5,340 GSF)/1 ,000]) = 13 1 s pace s/[18 ,706 GSF/1 ,000 ] = 7.00 spaces/1 ,000 GSF). It is noted that t he average weekday peak pa rk ing demand rat io of3.2 1 spaces/1,000 GSF as de rived fro m th e a bove e mpirica l parkin g demand study is lowe r than th e Code pa rk in g requi rement for re ta il uses (i.e., 4 .0 spa ces/ I ,000 GSF). The ave rage weekend peak pa rki ng demand ratio of7.0 spaces/ I ,000 GSF is grea ter t han the Code parkin g ratio fo r retail uses (i.e., 4.0 s paces/1,000 GSF) but lowe r t ha n t he Code parkin g ratio fo r restaurant uses (i.e ., I 0.0 spaces/ I ,000 GSF). Blended E mpirical and Code-Required Parkin g As di scu ss ed a bove, based on e mpirica l s ur veys co ndu cte d at th e three ex istin g ka raoke /KTV faci li t ies , t he average weekend pe ak parkin g demand ratio wa s determined to be 7.0 spaces/1 ,000 GSF. Ba se d o n direction fr om C ity staff, the si te- s pecifi c peak parking demand rati o of 9.0 s paces/ I ,000 GSF wa s uti l ized fo r the ka raoke /KTV use to provide a conse rvative forecas t . App li catio n of th e de ri ved peak parkin g dema nd rat io to the propo sed ka raoke/KTV project as we ll a s the Code parkin g requirement (i.e., at 4.0 spaces/1,000 GSF) for the re maining s hopping ce nter uses wou ld yie ld a total s it e -wid e parking requirement of 364 spaces as s how n bel ow and s ummarized in Table 2. • Reta il Space: 46 ,233 GSF x 1.0 space/250 GSF = 185 s pac es • All o wab le Res taur ant Space: 27 ,345 GSF x 1.0 space /250 GSF = I 08 spac es • Ka raoke/KTV Space: 7,89 1 GSF x 9.0 spaces/1,000 GSF = 71 spaces Bl e nded Em piri ca l and Code-Required Parkin g = 364 s pac es Thi s b lended e mpiri ca l a nd Code-required parkin g demand of 364 s paces wo ul d the o reticall y resu lt in a parkin g s urplu s of 30 s paces when co mp ared to the rece nt ly co ns tru cted parking s uppl y of 394 spa ces. Li fiS C 0 ll LA W & G RE E NSPM; f , II ~I i II t ' r' ' -.. Mr. Adam G ulick M ay 16 ,20 16 P age 7 Conclusions T hi s parking dem a nd a na lys is was conducte d for th e proposed ka raoke/KTV proj ect so th a t a determ in atio n co uld be m ade as to th e adequacy of th e recentl y con st ructed pa rki ng s uppl y to m eet t he a nti cipat ed p eak s ite -wide parking d e m a nd fo ll owin g occupancy of th e proposed proj ect with in th e Cam e lli a S qu a re s ho ppin g center. Based o n the p a r ki ng a n a lys is, the fo ll ow in g conc lu s ions a re m ade: • • • • A t ot a l of 394 parking spaces (274 sta nd a rd s paces, I 0 6 compac t s paces, a nd 14 ha ndi cap accessibl e s paces) has recent ly been con st ru c ted w ithin th e Center, w ith o ne a t -grade parkin g leve l ( 127 s paces) and o ne bel ow-g rad e pa rkin g level (267 s paces). Direct a pplicatio n of th e C ity o f T e mpl e Ci ty Mu ni c ipal Cod e to the e ntire Center wou ld y ie ld a total s ite -wide pa r k in g re quireme nt o f 326 p a rk in g s paces. Thus, direct a ppl icatio n of Cod e pa rk in g re quire me nt s to th e o ve ra ll o n-site parking s uppl y wo uld res ult in a theoretica l s urplu s of 68 pa rk ing s paces. It is recogni zed tha t t he C ity Code does not contain off-street pa rkin g require m e nts s p ecifi cally fo r ka raoke/KTV e ntertai nment u se s . Acco rdin g ly, a n empir ica l p a rking dem a nd stud y of existin g compa rab le fac iliti es th a t a re s imila r in nature (i.e., s ite loca ti o n, d e m ogra phi cs, fac ility a m e niti es, etc.) to th e pro posed project has bee n pre pa re d in o rd e r to determine th e adequacy of the project's parkin g s uppl y to mee t th e ex p ected park in g d e m a nd. The em piri ca l pa r king s urveys were condu c t e d in ho ur ly increments based o n each s ite's r es pect ive o pen in g ho urs during a typica l weekday and weekend day. The ove ra ll average weekda y a nd weekend peak pa rk in g dem a nd ra ti os for the th ree co mpa ra bl e s ites were determ in e d to be 3.21 a nd 7.00 s p aces pe r I ,000 s qua re fe e t of g ross floo r a rea, resp ecti vely. Based o n direction from C ity staff, th e s ite-spec i fic peak p a r k in g de m a nd rat io of9.0 s paces per 1,000 s qua re feet of g ross fl oor a rea was utili zed to provide a conservative forecast. A ppl icati o n o f th e empir ica l peak p a r king demand ra ti o to the karaoke/KTV use a nd appli cati o n of Ci t y Cod e re quirements to the oth e r te na nc ies w ithin t he s ho pping cente r w o ul d yie ld a peak park in g deman d re quire m e nt of 364 spaces. Thi s bl e nd ed e mp irica l a nd Code-requ ired park in g d e ma nd o f 364 spaces wo uld th eoreti ca ll y res ult in a park in g s urplu s of 3 0 s paces w he n compa re d to t he o n-si te pa rk in g s upp ly of394 s paces. Please fee l free to contact us a t 626 .796.2322, if yo u have a ny quest io n s rega rding th e pa rking a na lys is . CC: C.C. Ch ang. Project Con sultant 0 JOB f·IU~ ~l<i,~m.t.tl<-t \tld<x "' 0 N ~ .., 0 "' C> "' ~ Q. '3 ~G=============================================================~ / "' • , / ID "' .. / ~ ';] 0 7 0 N NOT TO SCALE MAP SOURCE: RAND MCNALLY & COMPANY * PROJECT S ITE LINSCOTI, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP 9055 LAS TUNAS DRIVE -KARAOKE/KTV P ROJECT CD 0 N ~ 0 CD N "' N ,;; ::3 ...J 0 :; In ~ ~ w (/) 0 a: ' ~j ' ' I I /, ....... , . ./ ''l I I ··I----' / _: t -:. __.. _,-I --d:v-..,.....,.,... / I .:. ............. --, ,' --........... /; ~----_____ :_J ________ c :~_::---_, // I I • I \ .,/ I ', / y /- /,./ / {~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~t=======================================================================================================~ ;;- "' • " / CD "' ... ~ -1 D :? 0 MAP SOURCE: HT H ARCHITECTS L LP N NOT TO SCALE LIN SCOTI, LAW & GREEN SPAN, engineers FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN 9055 LAS TUNAS DR IVE -KARAOKE/KTV PROJECT <D 0 N ;;, N ' "' 0 "' ~ ,:.: ~ ,:.: 0 0.. g !~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~==============================================================================================================~ / MAP SOURCE: RAND MCNALLY & COMPANY "' ~ N 0 MELODY KTV -ROWLAND HEIGHTS i -NOT TO SCALE ® / B SOOPSOK KARAOKE -LOS ANGE LES -¥ -1 .0 0 7 0 0 ZILLER KARAOKE BAR -FULLERTON LINSCOTI , LAW & GREENSPAN , engineers FIGURE 3 COMPARABLE SURVEY SITES 9055 LAS T UNAS DRIV E-KARAOKEJKTV PROJECT 121 1\0.0F I.OC'A no'i I S PAO:S ntU rsday, J\brch l. 20 16 Mdt~d)• K 'J Jl. R(JH-/tmd 1/~igllt.J On-Sne Spaces [J j 64 1'11U1/ /or Mt.loJ)• A'TII 64 Thurscb y. t\IRf'fh l. 2016 Soopsok Kurtwk(! ·Los Au;:t!la On·Snc Spaces 48 On·Sireet S >>Ces [41 7 1'01111/twSINJfXtJA Kurtmke 48 ruc-.sday. Man-h 8, 20 16 LUin-Aura~~ /Jur-Fullnton On-Sne Spaces 62 Totul fiw Zillu Kurufll.f! &r 62 Totulfo. All17"u Sitn 174 121 !'IO.OF I.OC'ATIO' SPACES Salunla). \1arth !-. 2016 Mdmly A7'V-Rm•·lu11d lldght' On·Slle Spa.;« I J I 64 TotlliJJ!! Mf!I(N/)• K11' 64 SaiU nby. \larc h !>. 2016 .'WiJJH(Ik Kunmkt!-to.\ A IIJ(~Itt: Qn..S1tc Spaces 48 On·Sircct Sj>.1COSI41 7 TtJial/or StXJ 'JtOk Karcwke 48 Salurdny. Mnrth 5. 2016 Zilli!.r KarUfJkt /Jur -F IIIIUt(JII On-Sne Spaces 6 2 1'utul /fJt' Zi/lf!r KuNw/.;.r/lllr 62 ltJtu/f(}rAII Thr«Sit.-, 174 Table 1 WEEKDAY AND WEEKEND PARKING ACCUMULATION SURVEYS [1) SURVEY DATES: Weekday (Thursda y , March 3, 20 16 and Tuesday, March 8, 2016) and Weekend (Sa turday, March 5, 2016) TOTAL OVERALL PARKING OCCUPANCY FOR OTHER COMPA RABLE SITE S WEEKDA \' Tl\1 E OF DA \' 2:00 P \1 3:00 P\1 -':00 1)\t 5:00 PM 6:00PM 7:00 I'~ I 8:00 P \1 9:00 P\1 ()("(', Pt-RO'NT ()("(', PfRC'£.''1' ()("(', l,fRCE:\,. ()("(', PERC E.VT ()("(', Pt:Rct::Jr(T oec. PrRCT.r-T {)('(', PERC'£1\T occ. P£RC t::.NT I I 6°o I I 6°o 0 0 0', 0 0 O'·o 0 0 0'. I I 6°o q 14 , •• 17 26 6°to I 1.6°/o I 1.6°/o 0 o.o•;. 0 0.0'4 0 0.0*!. I 1.6*/o 9 14.1 °/o 17 26.6*/o ----------------·----(51 --------------------------7 14 6°o 7 14 6°o 7 14 6% 9 188% ----·--·----............. ----·-[ll ·---------------------·-7 100 O'o 6 8~ ,., 6 85 7". 6 85 7"o I I I I I 14 29.211Jo 13 27.1*/o 13 27.1% 15 JI.JIIJo I I I I I I I ----·-----------1~1 ··-·--------------2 1 2'o 2 3 2'. II 17 ?-, I I I I I I I I I 2 J.l'/, 2 3.2,.,. II 17.7'1. I I 0.6'1. I I I 0.6% 0 0.0'/o I 0 1 0.0% I 14 l 8.0% 16 9.2'/o 24 13.8,. 4 3 U .7% WEEKEND Tl\1 E OF DAY 2:00 P\1 3:00 P\1 4 :00 P\1 5:00 P \1 6:00 PM 7:00 P~l 8:00 P\1 9:00 P\1 occ. PERCENT occ. PlJ<('(l<T occ. P£RCf .. NT occ. P~CE.'« occ. PEN.Cf'_.,T occ. Pt:RC£NT oec. PERCF ... ,I occ. PERCO.T I~ 23 4'• 23 ViQ4', 24 l7 4i', 22 )4 4', 10 14i6'• 21 n s•, 31 48 4°o 26 406'. 15 23.4 '/e 23 35.9'/e 24 J7.5't• 22 .14.4'4 10 15.6% 21 32.8% 31 48.-1 '1. 26 .a0.6'1• ----------lSI -------------------------------2 4 2~. 6 12 5°o 9 18 8°o 16 33 3~. -------·-·-·--··--·-........... (5 1 ................. -.... ·---·--·-·-.. ---· 6 85 'r'·~ 6 8S 7". 6 85 ?0~ 6 85 7"/o I I I 8 16.7'/, 12 25.0'4 15 3 1.3'/e 22 ... 5.8'1. I I I I I ·-------.. ~~ ------·----I I 6°o 2 3 2'. 6 q 7". 12 194°, 30 48 4°, I I I 1.6'1. 2 3.2'4 6 9.7% 12 19.4'4 30 .a8.4 % 15 8.6% I 23 13.2'.1. I 24 13.8% 23 13.2% 20 lt .s•;. 39 22.4'4 58 3JJ'4 78 44.8'4 (II The potlullj; demand'""'<>~ were conducted b) The Tr.>ffic SolutK>n tn M:vch 2016 10:00 P\1 11:00 l'\1 occ. PfRC'F.NT oec. I,FRCF.NT 24 37 ~·. 27 42 2'. 24 37.5% 27 42.2*/o 9 188% 8 167". 6 85 7"o 6 85 7". 15 3 1.3'4 14 19.2-Jo 17 27 4', 18 2Q()-, 17 27 • .a•;. 18 29.0'.1. 56 32.2'4 59 33.9'4 10:00 P \1 11 :00 P\1 OC('. PIRCE,VT ()('(", P£RC£.'1T lq zq 7"o 16 2~ o-. 19 29.7'1• 16 25.0% 39 81 J 0 o 46 95 s•. 5 71 4°o 6 8S 7". 44 9 1.7'/, 52 10().()% 48 n4•, 42 67 7". 48 77.4 % 42 67.7% Ill 6J.s-,. 110 63.2*,1. (21 The potlullj; uwentory wos conducted by The Traffic Soluuon For the Melody t..'TV sue locaJed '"tlun • shopputg center, the p..-lwtg supply tS hosed on the nurrber of spaces allocated per the Condlltonol Use Permt No 201200073. dolod No,cni>cr 6. 2012 12:00A\1 OC('. l)t::RCt::NT 12 1s s•. 12 18.8*/o 6 12 5% 6 85 r'~ 12 z~.o·;. I~ 24 2'. 15 24.2 % 39 22.4'/e 12:00 AM occ. PERCLVT 9 14 ,., 9 14.1 '4 4 S 93 8~. 6 85~. 5 1 tOCl.O% JO 484°o 30 ..a S,.a % 90 51.7'1'. {3) Parlang dermnd esumated for the Melod) k'n' sate based on lllboWldoutbound p31r0n obscn:auons condue1ed assumng a durauon ofc\1.0 houn: per \'1SII h was assumed 1hat p3n1es of Ito 2 persons :um'Cd vta one vducle. 3 to 5 persons amved ,,,a 1""0 \'etucles. and 610 8 persons arm'\.~ \ta three \dudes (4) Parkin& demand 1ncludcs "dudes psrlcd on-street along the propeny frontages on Jrd Street and Kmgslq Dnve for the Soopsok Kar30kc stte 111 Los ~cies. The on-qred parlong spaces were not InCluded as p3rt of the total parl.mgsupply co be con:serv;u, ... c lS I Park~ occupancy counts were not conducted duMg these hours as 1he Waoke fac1llry was closed outSide of1hc norf1131 hours ofopc:r:11tan_ LINSCOTI , LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref 1-1 6-4156-1 9055 Las Tunas-Karaokc/KTV P roJCCI I __ _ Tenant S p ace Bu il din g I 9055 Las Tunas Dri ve Bu i lding 2 5728 Ro semead Bo ul e vard Bu il din g 3 5708 Ro seme ad Boulevard Bu i ldi ng 4 5700 Ro semead Boul e var d Total Reta il Space Total Vaca nt (Retai l ) Space f3 l Table 2 PROPOSED TENANCY AND CODE PARKING ANALYSIS 9055 Las Tunas Drive· Karaoke/KTV Project Gross Proposed Us e a nd f loo r S uite Parking C lass ification 121 A rea 101 Food/Dri nk Es tabli sh ment 3,320 105 Food/Dri nk Es ta bli shment 7,11 0 110 Re tai l 3,487 125 Karaokc/KTV 7,89 1 100 Food/Dr ink Es tabli shme nt 1,7 10 102 Food/Dri nk Es tabli shme nt 1,4 9 0 105 Re tai l 1.6 13 10 7 Food/Dri nk Es ta blishment 2,600 5708 Food/Dr ink Establi shment 4 ,5 18 101 Food/Dr ink Es tabli shment 1,02 5 10 5 Food/Dri nk Es tabli shment 5.320 5,100 4 1,133 Total Approved Food/Drink Es tablis hme nt S pace f4 l 27,093 Remaining Food/Drink Establish ment Allowe d f41 252 Total Ka raoke/KTV S pa ce 7,891 Total Code Required P a .-l<i ng 8 1,469 Total On-S ite l'a •·king S uJ>p ly Su rplus/(Deli ciency) Notes: C ode Parki ng Ratio 4 /I ,000 s f 4 /I ,000 s f 4 /I ,000 s f 9 /1,000 s f (2 1 4 /I ,000 s f 4 /I ,000 s f 4 /I ,000 s f 4 /I ,000 s f 4 /I ,000 s f 4 /I ,000 s f 4 /1,000 s f 4 /1.00 0 s f 4 /I ,000 s f [I ] C ity o f Temple C it y Municipal Z onin g Code Se ction 9-1, J -2 , Number of Off-Stre et Parkin g Spaces Re quired. [2] Re fe r to Ta ble I and me morandum for der ivation of the peak park in g rati o fo r the karaoke/KT V use. Tot a l S paces Re quired 13 28 14 7 1 7 6 6 10 18 4 2 1 20 165 107 I 7 1 364 394 +30 [3 J Exi stin g va c an t spaces assumed to be occupied as reta i l s paces as co nfim1 e d with proj ect a pplicant re prese nta tiv es. T he vacant su ites arc c om pri sed o f: I ) S u ites 13 0. 135, 160 and 20 I in Bu il din g I , and 2) S uites I 0 3-104 , I 06, a nd 20 1-205 in Buildin g 2. [4] Re fe r to th e att achm ent for the lis t of fo od/drink establ ishments based on the a pproved e ntitleme nts as o f J anu ary 12 .20 16 . 11JC sq uare fo otage a ll owed pe r the ex is ting C onditi o ns of Appro va l fo r fo od/dr in k estab li s hments to ta ls 27.345 gross fl oor area. LI NSCOTT , LA W & GREEN SPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-1 6-4156-1 9055 Las T unas Drive -Karaok e!!-; TV Pr oj ec t LINSCOTI, lAW & GREENSPAN, engineers ATTACHMENT LIST OF FOOD/DRINK ESTABLISHMENTS APPLICATIONS LLG Ref. 1-16-4 156-1 9055 Las Tunas Drive -Karaoke/KTV Proj ec t fl lOB I ll l 11~ nk.' \tt,K flk.'ltCo,~rJo~.: Application Planning Building Address Business Name Unit Size Submitted Commission Date 1 9055 Las Tunas Dr., Units 100-Meet Fresh 3,320 sq.ft. 4/23/15 7/14/15 102 9055 Las Tunas Dr., Unit 105 Bistro Na 7,110 sq .ft. 7/6/15 8/25/15 2 5728 Rosemead Blvd ., Units Summer Rolls 1,710 sq.ft. 6/2/15 8/11/15 100-101 5728 Rosemead Blvd., Units Poke licious 1,490 sq.ft. 7/14/15 9/22/15 102 5728 Rosemead Blvd., Uni t s Simmer Huang 2,600 sq.ft . 6/30/15 8/25/15 107 3 5708 Rosemead Blvd. Papa Rich 4,518 sq .ft. 10/22/15 1/12/16 4 5700 Rosemead Blvd., Units Korean BBQ 5,320 sq.ft. 6/1/15 7/28/15 100, 101, 105 5700 Rosemead Blvd., Units Tea Station Express 1,025 sq.ft. 6/5/15 8/11/15 102-103 Total Square Footage allowed for Food/Drink Establishments 27,345 sq.ft. Approved Entitlements for Food/Drink Establ i sh me n ts as of January 12, 2016 27,093 sq.ft. Food/Drink Establishments Square Footage Remaining 252 sq.ft. ATTACHMENT 4 m KUZMAN PARKING STUDY • KTV KARAOKE/ CAMELLIA SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS June 30, 2016 Traffic Engineering I Transportation Planning I Parking I Noise/Vibration I Expert Witness Air Quality I Global Climate Change I Health Risk Assessment lt'!;I •K•U•N .. zM .. A•N•A .. s.so .. c.IA•T•E•S•,•l N•C• ..... ga~ma-.~~~ ~ ~ OVER 40 YEARS OF EXCELLEI\!T 5ER VICE June 30, 2016 Mr. Randy Wang, President MANHATIAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 1005 East Las Tunas Drive, Suite 505 San Gabriel, CA 91776 Dear Mr. Wang: INTRODUCTION Th e firm of Kunzman Associates, Inc. is pleased to submit this shared parking analysis for the proposed KTV Karaoke/Camellia Square Shopping Center project in the City of Temple City. The purpose of this shared parking analysis is to dete rmin e if the Camellia Square Shopping Center will provide adequate o n-s ite parking base d o n curren t approvals w it h t he proposed KTV Karaoke tenant. This report sum m arizes our methodology, analysis, and findings. Although this is a technical report, eve ry effort has been mad e to write the report clearly and conc isely. To assist the reader with those terms unique to transportation engineering, a glossary of terms is provided within Appendix A. PROJ EC T D ESC RIPTION The project site is located at the northeast corner of Rosemead Bou levard and Las Tunas Drive. The projec t site is developed with an 81,469 squa r e foot shopping center. Figure 1 i llustrates the project location map. The project site provides 127 surface level parking spaces and 267 basement level parking spaces for a total of 394 on-si t e parking spaces . Figure 2 shows the surface-level site plan for the project and Figure 3 shows the basement leve l site plan. Current entitlements for t he Camellia Square Shopp ing Center allow up to 27,345 sq uare fee t to be used fo r restaurant and th e remainder (54 ,124 square feet) for retail/office uses. The proposed project co nsist s of 27 ,345 sq ua re f eet o f restaurant, 46,233 square fee t of retail/offi ce uses , and 7,891 square feet of karaoke use. BA SE LI NE/CITY CO DE PARKING REQUIREM EN TS The City of Temple City Municipal Code (Section 9-lJ-2) requires shopping centers w ith more than 75,000 square feet of gro ss fl oor area to provide off-s treet parking at a rate of 4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. Accordingly, th e Came ll ia Square Shopping Ce nter is required to provide 326 parking spaces per City Code parking requirement s. Based on the 394 parking spaces provided, the Camellia 1111 T owN&: CouNTRY R o Ao, S u i TE 34 ORANGE. CALIFORNIA 92868 (7\4) 9 73-8383 WWW.TRAFFI C-ENOI N EER.COM 5005 LA MART OR I~ S UI TE 20\ RIVERSIDE. CALI FORNIA 92507 Mr. Randy Wang, President MANHATIAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC June 30, 2016 Square Shopping Cente r currently provides a surplus of 68 parking spaces per City Code requirements. The City Code parking re qu irements are contained in Appendix B. Since restaurants require more parking than r eta i l/office uses, the Camellia Square Shopping Center is currently limited to 27,345 square feet of restaurant uses to ensure adequate off-s treet parking is provided during peak lunch and dinner periods. City staff made this determination by calculating the parking requirements for each use as if they were standalone uses and evaluating the pa rking space deficit. To support t h e request to al low a proposed karaoke use, this analysis uses a similar methodology. Table 2 shows the Came ll ia Square Shopping Center pa rk ing requirements for each individual land use w ith the proposed karaoke project . Since the City Code does not include parking requ irements for karaoke uses, the off-street parking requirement fo r a ka raoke use was obta ined fro m the parking demand analysis prepared for the proposed KTV tenant (Memorandum : Rev ise d Parking Demand Analysis for the 9055 Las Tuna s Drive- Karaoke/KTV Project. LL G Enginee rs, May 2016) ("KTV Par king Demand Analysis"]. Th e KTV Parking Demand Analysis conducted parking accu m ulation surveys at three existi ng karaoke facil it ies . It is our professiona l enginee ring judgement that using the average peak parking demand observed for the three ex ist ing karaoke f ac ilities plus a 10-percent overage would provide a conservative estimate of the parking requirement for the proposed KTV tenant. As noted in t h e KTV Parking Demand Analysis, the survey site with the highest peak parking demand per squ are foot (Ziller Karaoke Bar) differs from the proposed KTV use i n that it is a standalone facility, it serves food and alcoholic beverages, and it opens later; it is also the smallest of the three facilities surveyed. The propose d KTV use is more comparable to the existing Melody KTV facility, which has simi lar hours of operation, is located in a shopping center, only serves pre-package d food and non-a lcoholic beverages, and was observed to have a peak parking demand of 4.56 parking spaces per 1,000 sq uare feet. To provide a conservative analysis, this report uses the average peak parking demand observed plus a 10-percent overage to determine parking requirements for the proposed KTV use . As shown in Table 2, karaoke parking r equirements are ca lculated at 7.7 parking spaces per 1,000 squ are f eet based on the findings of the KTV Pa rk ing Demand Analysis. As shown in Table 2, th e proposed project is forecast to require a total of approximately 520 parking spaces when calculating parking requirements fo r each individual land use. This represents the number of parking spaces t hat would be requi r ed if a ll the individu a l land uses peak at the same time. Since the actual d emand for each individual land use can vary by month, day of th e week, or time of day, a shared parking analysis is discussed in the following section to t he determine the actua l peak parking requirem ents for the enti re project after accounting for these variations. SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS Thi s shared parking analysis has been prepared using the procedures developed by the Urban Land Institute Shared Pa r king (2005) to evaluate t h e shared parking demand for the proposed project . The main concept beh i nd sh ared parking is that a m ix of two or more different land uses may have non- coincidental peak parking demand s, resulti ng in the opportunity for sharing of parking spaces. If the various land uses have peak parking demands at different points in time, or on different days of the WWW .TRAFFIC-ENGI N EER.COM 2 Mr. Randy Wang, President MANHATIAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LL C Ju ne 30, 2016 week, then the total n umber of spaces required at any point in time may be less than the sum of the peak parking requirements for each land use . A comp ute r program was used to perform th e share d parking ana lysis for the proposed project land uses . The program is consistent with the procedures provided by the Urban Land Institute and uses the following inputs for each land use: • Ba sel ine parking requirements ba sed on the Community Development Director's recommen d ation; • Weekend versus weekday adjustment factors ba se d upon Urb an Land Institute data; • Customer/visitor/guest and employee/resid ent fact ors based upon Urban Land I nstitute data; • Monthly adjustment factors to account for variations in parking demand over the year based upon Urban Land Institute data; and • Hourly distri bu ti on of p arki ng demand base d upon Urban Land In stitute data. The Urban Land In stitute shared parking ana lysis disaggrega tes the ba seline parking requirements into weekday and wee ke nd as well as customer/visitor/guest and employee/resident parking space demands. Table 2 shows the disaggregated parkin g rates based on City parking code requirements and Urban Land Institute data. As shown in Ta ble 2, the proposed project is f orecast to requ ire 427 parking sp aces on weekdays and 436 parking spa ces on weekends prior to accounting for monthly/hourly variations. It should be noted, t h e Urban La nd Institute d ata differentiates between fine/casua l dining and family restaurants and between r eta il and office uses. Si nce the proposed p roject has not identified a specific tenant for all units, this analysis assumes that roughly half of the proposed restaurant square footage w i ll be fine/casual d in i ng uses and the other half will be family res t aurant uses. Simila rl y, this analysis assumes that half of the commercial retail/offi ce square footage will be commercia l retail uses and half will be office uses . Additionally, the demand factors for th e proposed karaoke use are based on em pirica l data contained in the KTV Parking Demand Analysi s. Table 3 summarizes the forecast hourly parki ng demand by month for the proposed uses. As shown in Table 3, the weekday peak parking require m ent of 344 parking spaces is forecast to occur in December at 1:00 PM; the weeken d peak parking requirement of 326 p arking spaces is forecast to occur in Decemb e r at 8:0 0 PM. Figure 4 graphica lly depicts the monthly peak parking requirements. Fi gure 5 shows the hourly vari ati on in parking requirements for the peak month of December. The detailed ca lcu la tions for each month are included in Appendix C. Based on the p eak parking requ i r ement of 344 parking spaces, th e proposed project is forecast to provide a surpl us of 50 parking spaces compare d to the 394 off-str eet parking spaces provided. W WW.TRA FFIC-ENGI N EER.CO M 3 Mr. Ra ndy Wang, Pre si d en t MANH ATIAN DEVE LOPM ENT COMPANY, LLC Ju ne 30, 2016 CONCLUSIONS 1. Current e ntitlements for the Camellia Square Shop p ing Ce nter allow up to 27,345 square feet to b e used fo r restaurant and t h e rem ainder (54,124 sq uare f eet) for retai l/office uses. Th e proposed project consists of 27 ,345 squ are feet of restaurant, 46,233 square f eet of retail/office uses, and 7,891 square feet of karaoke use. 2. Th e project site. provi des 127 surface l eve l parking spaces an d 267 basement leve l parking spaces for a total of 394 on-site pa rk i ng spaces. 3. The proposed proj ect is foreca st to require a total of approximately 5 20 parki ng space s when calculating p arki ng r equirements f or eac h individual land use. This represents the number of parking spaces that would be requi red if all the individual lan d uses p eak at the sam e time . 4 . Based on the r es ults of the shared park ing ana lysis, the wee kda y peak parking re qu irement of 344 parking spaces is forecast to occur in Decemb er at 1 :00 PM; the weekend pe a k p arki ng requirem ent of 326 parki ng spaces is foreca st to occur in December at 8 :00PM. 5 . Base d on the peak parki ng r equireme nt of 344 pa r king spaces , th e proposed project is foreca st to provide a surplus of 50 parking spaces compared to the 394 off-street parking spaces provid ed . 6. Sufficient off-street parking is forecas t to be provided by th e proposed project based on the sh are d parking ana lysis. It has been a pleasure to serve y our needs on the KTV Karaoke/Camell i a Squa r e Shopp i ng Center project. Should you have any question s or if we can be of further ass istance, plea se do not h es itate to ca ll at {714) 973-8383 . Si ncerely, KU NZMAN ASSOCIATE S, IN C. Gian carlo Gand d ini, P.E. Manager of Traffic Engi n eering JN 6356 WWW.mAFFI C-ENGINEER.CO~I 4 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. QA P-jJJA Carl Ballard , LEED GA Princi p al Table 1 Off-Street Pa r king Requirements Based on Standalone Uses Gross Number of Parking Land Use Parking Requirement1 Floor Area Spaces Requ ired Restaura nt 10.0 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet 27,345 273 .5 Commercial Retail/Office 4 .0 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet 46,233 184.9 Ka raoke 7 .7 parki ng spaces per 1,000 square feee 7,891 60.8 Total 81,469 519.2 1 Based on City Code parking requir ements for individual uses. 2 Source: Memorandum: Revised Parking Demand Analysis fo r the 9055 Las Tunas Drive -Kar aoke/KTV Project. LLG Engineers, May 2016 Parking requir ement base d on ave rage peak parking demand observed in the KTV Pa r king De m and Analysis plus a lD-per cen t overage. 5 Table 2 Disaggregated Parking Code Requirements City Weekday Requirements1 W eekend Requirements1 Park i ng Cu stomer/ Employee/ Customer / Employee/ Land Use Quan tity Units2 Code Vi si tor /Guest Resident Total Visitor /Guest Residen t To t al Par k ing Rat es: Commerci al Re t ai l 23.117 TS F 4.00 2.90 0.60 3.50 3.2 0 0 .80 4.00 Fine/Casual Dining 13.673 TS F 10.00 7.63 1.38 9.01 8.50 1.50 10.00 Fam ily Restaurant 13.672 TS F 10.00 6.00 1.00 7.00 8.50 1.50 10.00 Karaoke3 7.891 TSF 7.70 4.40 0.00 4.40 7.70 0.00 7.70 Office 23 .116 TSF 4 .00 0.32 3.68 4.00 0.03 0 .3 7 0.40 Parking Re guir ed : Commer cial Re t ail 23.117 TSF 92 67 14 81 74 18 92 Fine/Casua l Di ning 13.673 TSF 137 104 19 1 23 116 21 137 Family Res t au rant 13.672 TSF 137 82 14 96 116 21 137 Kara o ke 7.891 TSF 61 35 0 35 61 0 61 Office 23.116 TSF 92 7 85 92 0 9 9 To t al 81.469 519 29 5 132 427 367 69 436 1 So urce: Ci ty Code o ff-street parking requir ements (see Table 2) dis aggregat ed based on ratios contained in the Urban l and Institute, Shar ed Parking, 2nd Edition, 200S. 2 TSF ; Thousand Square Feet 3 Weekday/weekend rat1os for karaoke use are based o n empi rical data contain ed i n the KTV Parking Deman d Analysis. Since the em pi rica l data ava1lable does not dist inguish between customers and employees. the demand data has been applied to the "Customer" parkmg demands and ac cou nts for the total of cu st omers and employees. 6 Table 3 Hourly Parl<ing Demand Summary by Month WH .. dity t.nua rrbrl.Yrt ~ .. rch Ap<.t Moy ,.... JulY A&.! U\1 Mt.m~ Oct .... .......... 0f(JtmMf" Lat•O.Umbet' Cut.t/ Custl Cu.tl Cust/ Cut.t/ Cut.t/ Cust/ Cut. I./ Custl Custl Cut.t/ CuU/ Cut.t/ TlmfOf DI vo' lmp Totti •• Emp Totti v. Emp To111 Vis Imp 1 0111 ... [mp Tot•l v. Emp Tot•l ... Imp Total •• Imp Tot II •• Imp Total v • Imp Tot•l Vos Imp Total v. Imp TOt II v. Imp Total 600AM 18 11 29 18 11 29 20 11 31 19 11 30 20 11 31 20 ll 31 20 10 30 20 10 30 19 11 J( 20 ll 31 " 11 30 22 11 33 21 10 31 700AM 37 42 79 38 42 80 .. 4l 14 40 4l 13 42 4l ~~ .. 0 14 4 2 .. 13 43 41 14 40 43 ll 42 43 ~ 40 43 13 .. 0 87 4 2 )7 79 SOD AM 49 ., 138 ~ 89 139 S4 " 14~ ~2 " 143 ~~ " 146 ~~ " 146 s~ II 14) ~7 II 14~ ~2 " 10 ~~ " 146 S4 92 146 60 93 1~3 ~3 79 ll2 900AM 70 liS ·~ 70 liS 18~ 78 116 194 7~ 116 "' 71 116 ,,. 79 116 195 79 112 191 81 112 19) 75 116 191 78 116 ,,. 78 118 196 86 119 20S 74 102 176 tO-OOAM lOS 123 228 105 123 228 116 125 241 112 125 237 118 us 241 117 125 242 118 121 239 121 121 24 2 113 125 238 118 125 243 118 127 24 5 130 128 258 109 110 219 11 OOAM Ul 124 257 us 124 259 ISO 126 276 145 126 271 lSI 126 277 lSI 126 277 153 122 27S lS6 122 278 146 126 272 lSI 126 277 151 128 279 169 129 298 148 111 259 NOON 173 117 290 175 117 292 194 119 lll Ill 119 307 197 119 116 196 119 liS 199 115 )14 201 115 311 Ill 119 307 197 119 )16 196 121 317 221 122 )4l 202 lOS 307 I OOPM 170 117 217 172 117 ,., 190 119 309 ta5 "' l04 19) 119 312 192 11.9 111 19S 115 )10 199 liS ll4 ta5 119 l04 191 ll'l 112 1.92 121 lll 222 122 ~ 201 lOS l06 200PM 1)6 125 261 138 us 261 152 127 279 141 127 275 ISS 127 212 1S4 127 211 ISS 121 271 160 l2l Ill ,., 127 276 ISS 127 282 m 129 214 114 130 )14 164 112 276 JOOPM 10~ 120 22S 106 120 226 Ill 121 2)9 114 121 215 120 121 241 120 121 2'1 120 117 217 122 117 239 115 121 236 120 121 241 120 121 243 ISO 124 274 ll3 106 219 .400PM Ill ll2 223 lU lU 224 12~ Ill 211 121 Ill 234 127 Ill 240 127 Ill 240 127 109 236 llO 109 219 122 Ill 215 127 Ill 240 121 liS 242 lS4 116 270 ll7 " 216 500PM 1S6 ll 239 1S7 ll 240 17~ ., 260 169 IS 2S4 177 ., 262 177 ~ 262 179 ll 262 Ill I) 266 169 ·~ 2S4 177 ., 262 177 17 264 191 .. ,., 110 71 251 'OOPM 114 61 24~ 186 61 247 20S 61 261 '" 61 262 201 6) 271 207 61 270 210 61 272 liS " 277 '" u 262 201 61 271 207 6S 272 227 66 291 202 61 263 700PM 119 ., 2ll 191 49 240 211 ~· 262 20S 51 2~ 214 ~· 265 211 ~· 264 216 so 266 221 so 271 20S " ~ 214 " 26~ 2ll Sl 266 229 S4 213 200 ~· 2>1 IOOPM 181 46 234 190 46 236 209 48 2~7 204 41 2~2 212 48 260 211 48 259 214 48 262 219 48 267 20) 48 251 212 48 260 210 ~ 260 221 " 279 197 ., 246 900PM 175 39 214 177 )9 216 194 .. 2lS 111 .. 229 195 41 236 1.9~ 41 236 198 40 238 201 4 0 2'1 lJI 41 229 1.95 41 236 l9l 0 216 2U .. 257 186 ., 221 lOtiO PM 167 ll 191 161 ll "' Ill )) 216 171 ll 211 114 )) 217 114 3) 217 117 ll 220 190 ll 221 177 )) 210 184 ll 217 tal )4 21S 197 lS 232 171 34 212 ll.OOPM 140 '~ ·~ 142 25 167 152 27 179 149 27 176 lS4 27 tal 151 27 taO 156 27 Ill lSI 27 ··~ 148 27 175 lS4 27 111 151 27 171 161 27 Ill 151 27 178 MIDNIGKT 6) 11 ,. n 11 ,. 61 12 10 66 ll ,. 61 12 10 61 12 10 69 12 11 69 12 II 66 12 71 61 12 10 66 12 71 70 12 12 61 12 80 ~Jumwm 290 292 lll 107 )16 315 114 311 307 316 317 )44 307 WHl•nd J.nu.rv F.._.ry M.ttCh .... M•v Jun• July Auaust St t•mbt>t Oct .... Nowm~ o.c ...... Ut• O.C•mbfi Cu~t/ (ust/ CU1t/ Cu~t/ Cust/ CU>tl Cu\t/ Cu~t/ Cust/ CustJ Cu~t/ Cuu/ '"'" T•mttof 0• v. lmo Tot•l ... Imp Tot•l ... Imp Tot.tl v .. lmp Total v .. Imp tot•l VK Imp ToUI v. Imp Totti v .. Imp Tot•l . .. Imp Tot•l •• Imp Total v .. Imp lot1l VI\ Imp Tot1l v. Imp Tot•l 600AM 10 11 21 10 11 21 11 12 23 11 12 2l 11 12 2l 12 12 24 11 12 23 1) 12 25 11 12 23 11 12 23 12 ll 2~ 1l u 26 12 ll 25 700AM 27 21 so 27 23 so lO 24 S4 29 24 Sl 30 24 54 ll 24 5~ ll 24 55 32 24 ~ 29 24 53 lO 24 S4 lO 24 54 33 25 5I 31 23 S4 SOD AM 49 lS 84 49 3~ 84 55 )6 " Sl l6 .. ~5 36 91 55 36 91 ~ )6 92 57 )6 9) 53 )6 89 55 36 91 S4 )6 90 59 )7 96 ~ lS 91 90DAM 81 41 129 ll 48 lll 9 1 ~ 141 19 so 1)9 91 ~ 14) 92 so 142 ,. ~ 144 96 so 146 II 50 Ill 93 ~ 14) 92 51 14) 107 5) 160 89 so ll9 lOOOAM 110 55 165 111 55 166 123 S7 180 120 57 177 125 57 112 124 57 181 127 57 184 130 57 187 119 57 176 us " 182 124 59 Ill 148 60 208 123 57 180 ti:OOAM Ill 57 Ill ll2 57 189 147 59 206 143 59 202 149 59 201 149 59 201 151 59 210 154 59 211 142 59 201 149 59 201 147 61 201 173 n 236 lSI 59 210 NOON 112 57 139 184 57 241 201 59 262 199 59 258 206 59 265 20S 59 264 209 59 261 214 '" 273 197 '" 2~ 206 59 265 204 61 265 ll1 63 300 212 59 271 I OOPM 175 ~ 231 171 ~ 234 197 5I 255 192 51 2~ 199 5I 257 200 5I 2SI 202 5I 260 207 Sl 265 190 5I 248 199 5I 257 '" 60 259 21) 62 295 211 59 270 200PM lSI S4 212 160 54 214 177 ~ 2ll l7l 56 229 179 56 2lS 180 ~ 236 110 ~ 216 186 56 242 172 ~ 221 179 56 2lS 110 5I 231 209 60 269 119 57 246 JOOPM ll9 41 117 140 48 111 lS4 so 204 151 so 201 lS6 so 206 157 ~ 207 157 ~ 207 162 so 212 ISO so 200 156 so 206 lSI 52 210 liS S4 219 166 51 217 400PM 142 .. 111 14) 4 6 189 lSI 48 206 1S4 .. 202 160 48 201 161 48 209 160 41 201 ·~ 48 2ll 154 41 202 16< 48 201 161 ~ 211 117 52 2)9 169 49 218 ~OOPM 161 ~) 221 111 53 224 117 ~5 242 Ill ~~ 238 191 ss 246 190 55 245 191 55 246 197 5~ 252 Ill 55 238 191 55 246 191 57 241 220 59 279 195 " 2S2 600PM 202 51 25) 205 51 ~ 22> ~) 271 220 Sl 271 221 ~l 211 227 ~ 210 232 51 21~ 237 Sl 290 211 ~] 271 228 51 211 226 55 211 255 56 lll 221 55 283 700PM 21S ~ 265 211 so 261 238 52 290 233 52 ,., 241 52 293 241 52 293 , .. 52 296 249 S2 301 231 S2 21) 241 Sl 29) 240 S4 294 261 ~5 123 238 54 292 SOD PM 222 so 272 224 50 274 245 ~2 297 240 52 292 247 52 "' 247 52 "' 251 52 303 255 52 307 231 52 290 247 52 "' 244 53 297 271 55 ill 244 51 297 'JOOPM Ill 4 5 221 184 45 229 '" ., 246 195 47 242 201 47 248 200 47 247 204 4 7 251 201 47 255 ,,. 47 241 201 47 248 '" 48 247 219 so 269 19) 41 24 lO'OOPM 189 l9 221 191 19 230 204 41 245 200 41 241 206 41 247 206 41 247 209 41 2SO 212 41 251 '" 41 240 206 41 247 204 •2 246 220 4l 263 200 •2 242 1100 PM 170 32 202 171 32 201 Ill 34 217 179 ~ 213 114 )4 211 l84 34 218 117 34 221 119 34 223 171 )4 212 184 34 211 Ill 34 21~ '" lS 227 111 34 216 MIOfrrftGHl 109 17 126 109 17 126 115 18 m 114 II ll2 116 II 134 115 II m 117 11 us 119 II 1)7 Ill II lll 116 II 134 114 11 m 119 II U7 115 II Ill Mnltnum 272 274 297 292 299 "' 303 )()7 290 299 297 326 297 'c...--..... ""'-.I ... I• ~ Tabl e 4 Monthly Peak Parking Demand Summary Month Weekdays Weekends January 290 272 February 292 274 March 313 297 April 307 292 May 316 299 Ju ne 315 299 July 314 303 August 318 307 Se ptember 307 290 October 316 299 November 317 297 December 344 326 Late Decembe r 307 297 Maximum 344 326 8 @ Ku NZMA '-.!AssociATES, I Nc. Figure 1 Project Location Map 9 JN 6356 Figure 2 Site Plan-Surface Level ~ Ku 'Zli.IAN A ssoc i ATEs, I Nc. JN 6356 10 Figure 3 Si te Plan -Ba sement Level -~--../"" ------- @KuNZ MAN A ssoc i AT ES, I Nc . JN 6356 U\'LR ·1L1 Y [ \R~ or Excu 1 LN1 S u~\'I CL 11 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Figur e 4 Month ly Peak Parking Requirement s 400 350 1- p;;;:--b=; ,.--I-t--,_1--1-I=,.--~ f.--I=-1-1---300 1-,...., 250 r-r--r--r--t--t--t--!--!----1--r- 200 i---t--1--f.--1--1--1--f.--f.----1--r- 150 -r--r--r--1--1--1--!--f.--1---1--r- 100 -1--1--,.--1--1--1--r--1---1--- -r--~ r-1--1--1--,.---1---1--- 0 -''----'-'----........ .____ -JL---'------~---L,__ ..... _ .... L,__ --.... ... .. June K u NzMAN A ssoc i ATES, I Nc. JN 6356 OvlR 4 Ll Y c >.Rs L•F ['I:Clll LN1 SLR\ KL 12 Figure 5 Peak Month (December) Hourly Par k ing Demand 400 350 r]- 250 t-1---1--,...-,...--r-- 200 t--t-t-- - --1----1--r--t--- 150 1--1--1--1--1--f-I---t---I-I-1--- 100 1--I-1--1--1--I-I-- -1---1-1-r--1- 50 1-1-1-1-1-1-t-t-t---t---t-t-t-1- ll 600AM 71XJA~ 1:00 AM 900AM 1000~ ll.OON-4 "'-CXl'\1 lOOPM 200PM 3:00PM .CDOPM S:OOPYI 600PM 7:00PM IOOPM 91X)PM lOOOPM liOOPM~~~vGtT rme ot o.y K u NZMAN Assoc i ATEs, I Nc. Ovm -10 V t\R5 o F E-..:cult:-.11 SLR\"ICL 13 • Wee\days •we.bnds JN 6356 ---~----------------------------------- APPENDIX A GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS COMMON ABBREVIATIONS AC: ADT: Caltrans: DU: ICU : LOS: TSF: V/C: VMT: Ac r es Average Daily Traffic Californ ia Department of Transportat ion Dwell ing Unit Intersecti on Capacity Utilization Level of Service Thousand Square Feet Volume/Capacity Vehicle M iles Traveled AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC : The total volume during a year divided by the number of days in a yea r . Usually only weekdays are included. BANDWIDTH: The number of seconds of green time available for through traffic in a sig nal prog ression. BOTILENECK : A constriction along a travelway that limits the amount of traffic that can proceed downstream from its location . CAPACITY : The maximum number of vehicles that can be reasonably expected to pass over a given section of a lane or a roadway in a given time period. CHANNELIZATION : The separati on or regulation of co nflicting traffic m ovements into definite pa t hs of travel by the use of pavement m arkings, raised islands, or other suitable means to facil itate the sa fe and orderly movements of both vehicles and pedestrians. CLEARANCE I NTERVAL : Nearly same as ye ll ow time. If there is an all r ed i nterval after the end of a ye ll ow, then tha t is also added into the clearance interva l. CORDON : An imaginary line around an area across which vehicles, persons, or other items are counted (in and out). CYCLE LENGTH : The time period in seconds required for one complete signa l cycle. CUL-DE -SAC STREET : A local street open at one end only, and with specia l provisions for turning around . DAILY CAPACI T Y: The da ily vo lume of traffic that will result in a volume during the peak hour equal to the capacity of the roadway. DELAY: The tim e consumed w h ile traffic is impeded in its movement by some element over w h ic h it ha s no cont r ol, usu all y expres se d in sec on ds p er vehicle. DEMAND RESPON SIVE SI GNAL : Same as traffic-actuated signal. DENSITY : The number of vehicles occupying in a unit length of the through traffic lanes of a roadway at any give n instant. Usually expresse d in vehicles per mil e. DET ECTOR : A device that responds to a physical stimulus and transmits a resulting impulse to the signal controller. DESIGN SPEED : A speed se lected for purposes of design. Features of a highway, such as curvature, superelevation, and sight di stance (upon which the sa fe operation of vehicles is dep endent) are corre lated to design speed. DIRECTIONAL SPLIT : The percent of traffic in the peak d i rection at any point in time. DIVERSION : Th e rerouting of peak hour traffic to avoi d congestion. FORCED FLOW : Opposite of free flow. FREE FLOW : Volumes are well b elow capacity. Vehicles can maneuver freely and travel is u nimpeded by other traffic. GAP : Time or distance between succe ssive vehicles in a traffic stream, rear bumper to front bumper. HEADWAY: Time or distance spac i ng between success ive vehicles in a t raffic stream, front bumper to front bumper. INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL SYSTEM : A nu m b er of int erse ction s that are connected to ach i eve signal progressio n . LEVEL OF SERV ICE : A qualitative measure of a number of factors, which include speed and travel t ime, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and co nveni enc e, and operating costs . LOOP DETECTOR : A vehicle detector consisting of a loop of wire embedd ed in the roadway, energized by alternating current and producing an output circuit closure when passed over by a vehicle. MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE GAP : Smallest time headway between successive vehicles in a traffic stream into which another vehicle is willing and able to cross or merge. MULTI-MODAL: More than one mode; such as automobile, bus transit, rail rapid t ransi t , and b icycle transportation modes. OFFSET : Th e time interval i n seconds between the beginning of gre en at one intersection and the beginning of green at an adjacent i ntersection. PLATOON : A cl osely gro uped co m ponent of traffic that is compose d of severa l vehicles moving, or standing ready to move, with clear spa ces ahead and b ehind. ORIGIN -DESTINATION SURVEY: A survey to determine the point of orig i n and the poin t of destin ation for a given veh icl e trip. PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS (PCE): One car is one Passenger Car Equ ivalent. A truck is eq u al to 2 or 3 Passenger Car Equivalents in that a truck requires longer to start, goes slower, and accelera tes slower. loaded trucks have a higher Passenger Car Equivalent t h an empty trucks. PEAK HOUR : The 60 consecu t ive minutes with the highest number of vehicles. PRETIMED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that d irects traffic to stop and go on a predetermin ed time sche dule w it hout regard to traffic cond itions. Also, fixed time signa l. PROGRESSION : A term use d to d es cribe the progressive movement of traffic through severa l sig nali zed intersections. SCREEN-LINE : An imaginary line or physical feature across which all trips are counted, normally to verify the validit y of mathematical traffic models. SIGNAL CYCLE : The time period in seconds required for one complete sequence of signal ind ications. SIGNAL PHASE : The part of the signal cycle allocated to one or more traffic movemen t s. STARTING DELAY : Th e de lay ex perienced i n initiat ing the m ovement of qu eue d t ra ffi c from a sto p to an average running speed through a signa li zed intersection. TRAFFIC-ACTUATED SIGNAL : A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go in accorda nce with the demands o f traffic, as registered by the actuation of detectors. TRIP : The move m ent of a person or vehicle from one location (orig i n) to another (de stina tion). For example, from home to store to home is two trip s, not one. TRIP-END : One end of a t rip at either the origin or de stination; i.e. ea ch t rip has two tri p-end s. A trip-end occurs w hen a p erso n, object, o r m essage is transferre d to or from a ve h ic le . TRIP GENERATION RATE: The quantit y of trips p rod uc ed and/or attracte d by a spe cific land use stated in t erm s of unit s su ch as p er dwelli ng , per acre, and per 1,000 sq uare feet of floor sp ace . TRUCK : A veh icle having dua l t ires on one or more axles, or having more than two axles. UNBALANCED FlOW : Heav ier t r affic flow in one direction than the other. On a da i ly basis, most f acilities have bal anced flo w. During the peak hours, flow is seldom balanced i n an urban area. VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEl: A m easure of the amount of usage of a sec tio n of hi ghwa y, obtai ned by m ultip lying the average daily traffic by length of facility i n miles. APPENDIX B CITY OF TEMPLE CITY MUNICIPAL CODE PARKING REQUIREMENTS ---------------- 5117/2016 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. ARTICLE J. OFF STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS 9-1 J-0: OFF STREET PARKING FACILITIES: The uses permitted in each zone , as establ ished by thi s chapte r, shall be deemed to include the off street parking facilities fo r automobiles , accessory or in cidenta l to any principal permitted use in such zones. Every use permitted in any zone by this chapter shall be provided with permanently maintained off street parking facilities in the manner provided in this article; such required parking fac iliti es sha ll be used only for off street parking , and a ny use inconsistent therewith shall be unlawful. (1960 Code) 9-1J-1: PARKING CONCESSION AGREEMENTS: A. General : Pursua nt to authority granted by sectio n 400 of the Temple City charter, and the other parking standards and requireme nts of this article notwithstanding , the city may enter into an agreement with an owner or developer of a facility that wou ld requ ire off street parking ("parki ng concession agreement"). Through the parking concess ion agreement the city may grant to the owner or deve loper of the project , as provided in this section, e ith er: 1) a decrease in the off street parking requirements that would otherwise be requ ired for the project under the provisions of this article ; or 2) ce rtain concessions related to site design standard s or other zoning standards under the provisions of th is title that would otherwise be imposed upon the project ("site development standards"). B. Review And Approva l : Th e community deve lopment director, or his/her designee shall develop an application form for a pa rk ing co ncess ion agreement. The city council shall determine a permit fee, to be established by resolution, equal to the reasonable cost of reviewing and considering the application . Any owner or developer of a project seeking a parking concession agreement shall comp lete and s ubmit an application , together with such other inform atio n the community development director may reasonably request. An app li ca ti on s hall be submitted to the p lanning commission for review and recom mendation at a public hearing noticed pursuant to Government Code section 65090. The recommendation of the plann ing commission sha ll then be forwarded to the city counci l for cons id eration at a pub lic hearing noticed pursuant to Government Code section 65090. Approva l of a parking concession ag reement sha ll exempt the project from compliance with tho se standards and requirements of this title as are provided for in the agreement cond itioned upon compliance wi th the terms and conditions of such agreement . C. On Site Parking Redu ction : An owner or developer seeking a parking concession agreement that will reduce the off street parking requirement for a proposed project shall meet the following criteria: 1. The off street pa rking reduction is not greate r th an twenty five percent (25%), un less a greater reduction is dete rmin ed by the city to be warranted under the circumstance; a nd 2. The off street parking redu ction does not create a reasonab ly fore see able adverse impact on traffic c irculation, public safety or the environment ; and 3. T he owner/deve loper has obtained a w ritten agreement appropriate for recordation entitling the http:li\vww.sterlingcodi fiers .com/codebooklindex.php?bookjd=889 1/16 5/1712016 Sterl i ng Codi fiers , Inc. pro pose d project to s hare off street pa rk in g wi th one or mo re adj acen t or proximately located s ites w hich provide suffic ient excess off street pa rking to absorb t he proposed red uction in off street parking on the app licant's s ite ; or a lterna ti ve ly, the owner/deve loper wi ll pay an off street parking impact mit igation fee as determ ined to b e warranted by the city under the circumstances ; or some co mbination o f the above ; and 4. Th e owner/deve loper a grees to cons t ruct improvements (w heth e r on s ite or off site) that encourage and faci litate a lternati ve modes of transportation and that promote transporta t ion demand management and tr ip reduction measures includ ing , but not li mited to , provision of b icycle racks an d/or lockers , e lectric ve hicle charg in g s tati ons , bus turno ut s, bus she lters and shuttle services from pub l ic parkin g faci l iti es or off site private pa rki ng f aci liti es. D. Site D evelopment Standa rd s Reduction : A n owner or deve lope r seeking a parking concession ag reement that wil l pa rti ally or e ntire ly exempt a proposed project from comp ly in g with certain spec ifi ed site develop me nt s tan d ards sha ll meet the followi ng crit e ria: 1. T he proposed project w ill supp ly a surplus of off street parking of at least ten percent (1 0%) in excess of the project's peak parking req ui rement unless a lower surpl us is determined by the c ity to be wa rranted under t he ci rcumstance; a nd 2. A covenant mus t be recorded against th e proposed project si te ensuring avai labi l ity of any su rplus off s t reet parking prov ided through a pa rki ng concession ag reement for general publ ic use or for ded icated use on a si t e adjacent or prox i ma te to the proposed project as approved by the c ity; and 3 . The amount and loca ti o n of any such surpl us off street park in g provi des reaso nab ly convenient pedestrian access from t he s urplus park ing location to other commercia l uses in the vicinity; and 4. T he amount and location of any off street s urpl us parking to be provided is co nsistent w ith any ci ty adopted plans concern ing the supp ly of off street parking in t he commun ity, if applicable ; and 5. The site development standards reduct ion requested does not create a reasonably foreseeab le adverse impact on pu blic safety or the e nvironment. E. Bui ld ing Regulations : Co n cessions rega rding off street parking requirements or s ite development stan dards shall not inclu de b ui lding regula t ions adopted pursuant to ti tle 7 of th is code or that are otherwise imposed by st ate or federal law. F. Authori ty : The city retains exclusive authority to enter into a parking con cession agreement. The city may choose to enter o r reject a parki ng concession agreement based on an individual ized ana lysis of the particular off si te pa rkin g facility at issue. (Ord . 12-959) 9-1J-2: PARKING SPACES REQUIRED : T he off street parking spaces required for each use permitted by th is chapter, sha ll be not less than the following, provided that in no case shall th ere be less than three (3) spaces per comm erci al or man ufactu ring unit and furthe r provided that any fra ct io nal pa rking spa c e shall be computed as a who le : http :/lwww.sterlingcodi fi ers.com /codebook/i ndex.php?book jd=889 2/16 51 1712016 Use Assembly bui ldings - including churches , stadiums , sports a re nas, schoo l aud ito rium s, thea ters, dance h alls, clubs and lodges having no s leeping quarters a nd other places of assem bly Auto motive sa les or renta l, boat sa les or rental, trai l e r sa les or rental , ret ai l nurse ri es and oth er permitted use s not co nducted in a build in g Ba n ks , business o r professional offices I Bowling all eys Communications eq uip ment bui ld ing Com m unity care faci lity/large I Dwe ll ing units: Sing le -family II Ster ling Codifiers , Inc. Number Of Off Street Parking Spaces Required 1 for each 5 fixed sea ts. If the re be n o fixed seats, 1 for 50 square feet of gross fl oo r area us ed fo r assembly purposes. Where fixed sea ts co ns ist of pews o r benches , the seating capaci ty s hall be comp ute d upon 22 li nea r in ches per seat. 1 parking space fo r each 1,000 square fee t of gross land area devoted to open display or sa les , provide d th at whe re s uch a rea exceeds 10 ,000 square feet, on ly 1 parking space need be provided fo r each 5,000 sq ua re f ee t of s u ch gross l and a rea in excess of 10,000 square feet, or 1 space f o r each 2 emp loyees w hichever is greater. 1 parking space fo r ea c h 250 square feet of gross fl oor area. 113 parking spaces for each a ll ey. 1 parking space for each 2 e mployees on t he la rgest working s hi ft a nd 1 parking s pace f o r each com pa ny vehicle operated or kept in co nn ectio n wi th th e use . 1/2 space per bed or per adu lt under care , wh ic hever is greater, plus 1 addit iona l space fo r each agen c y vehicle , emp loyee , and visiting doctor. 2 parki ng s pa ces per dwe llin g unit , each of w h ic h must be loca ted in a garage. 3 garage park in g spaces pe r dwell in g unit fo r dwelling s with more tha n 4 bedrooms . A den , library, stu dy or sim il ar habitable room which functiona ll y could be used a s a bedroom sha ll be considered a bedroom fo r pu rposes of determi ning required parkin g . =~============~~==============================================~ Dl Guesthouse 12 parking spaces , each of wh ich shall be i n a gara ge . Said parking may . . be in tandem. ~I Mul tiple 12 parking spaces per dwell ing unit , each of wh ich must be located in a garage or carport , plu s 1 space , which sha ll be open a nd unenclosed, fo r each 2 units o r a ny fract ion th e reof. Dl Second un it 12 parking spaces, each of w hich s ha ll be in a garage. Said parking may . . be in tandem. = Condomin iums 2 parking spaces (enclosed in a ga rage with door) per dwell ing unit , plus 1 additio na l open and unenclosed space for eac h 2 dwell ing units. Un its w ith 3 or more bedrooms s hall require an additional 1/2 parking spa c e. I Educational in sti tut io ns: I httpJ/www.sterlingcodifiers.com /codebooklindex .php?book _id=889 3116 5/17120 16 Sterling Codlfiers, Inc. H D Elementary and junior 1 parking space for each employee and each faculty member. high D High school and trade 1 parking space for each 5 students and 1 parking space for ea c h schools faculty member and employee . D IColleges 1 1 parking space for each 3 students and 1 parking space for each faculty member and employee. Emergency shelte r 1 space for every 10 beds p lus 1 space per each empl oyee and agency vehicle. Fast food 1 park ing space for each 150 square feet of gross floor area , but there establishments with shall be no l ess than 5 parking spaces provided. queued drive-through se rvi ce General commercial; 1 parking space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area . retail stores , service shops , and general offices Grocery stores , 1 parking space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area . supermarkets, convenience stores, and minim arts Gymnasium, hea lth 1 parking space for each 400 sq uare f eet of gross floor area , plus 1 s tudios, and martia l arts parking space for each employee. studios I Hospitals 112 park ing spaces for each bed . I I Hotels 111 pa rki ng space for each ro om . I Libraries and library 1 park ing space for each 500 square feet of gross floor area. sta ti ons when located on publicly owned sites I Liquor stores I 1 parking space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area . Manufacturing and 1 parking space for each 2 employees on the largest shift or for e ach industrial uses of all 400 squa re feet of gross floor area whichever is greater, and 1 pa rki ng types, except a building space for each vehi cle operated or kept in connection with the use. or portions of bu ildings fo r warehouse purposes Me dical or dental clinics 1 parking space for each 200 sq uare feet of gross fl oor area. and medical professiona l offices Mini-malls as defined in Parking shall be requ ired based upon us e, o ccupancy, gross flo o r area section 9-1 A-9 of this and number of individual units ; provided , however, that no less than 7 chapter parki ng spaces s hall be prov ided per commercial unit o r bus ine ss on the stree t (ground) level. Parking requirements for a second story and subsequent stories sha ll be regulated by provisio ns of this sectio n of th e zoning code based upon the proposed use , occupancy, gross floor http://www.sterl ingcodi fiers .com /codebooklindex.php?book _id=889 4/16 5117120 16 Sterling Codifiers , Inc. I Mortuaries II area and number of individual units. I 1 parking space for each 40 square feet of floor area devoted to assembly purposes . I Motels I 1 parking space for each sleeping unit or dwelling unit. I Nursing , convalescent 1 parking space for each bed , plus 1 parking space for each employee homes, rest homes and with res id e nce fa ci lities provided on the premises . sanatoriums Public utility fa c il iti es not 1 parking space for each 2 e mployees on th e large s t sh ift a nd 1 havin g parking s pace for each vehicle operated or kept in connection w ith the business offices on the use. pre mises Rest a urants, bars , 1 parking space for each 100 s quare feet of gross floor area, but there coffee shops, doughnut shall be no less than 10 parking spaces provided. shops, and coffee and/or tea establishments, which provide customer seating Room ing houses, 1 parking space for each s leepi ng room . lodging hou ses, cl ubs and fraternity houses having sleeping rooms Shopping centers with 1 parking space for each 250 sq ua re feet of gro ss floor area. more than 75 ,000 square feet of gross floor area Single room o ccupancy 1 space s hall be provided per 4 SRO units plus an additional 1 space if (SRO) building an on si te manager is prov ided. Supportive housing Parking as req uired per appli cab le zoning district but may be re duced based upon a s ubmitte d parking study subject to approval by th e director. Swimm ing poo ls, 1 parking space f or e ach 1,000 square feet of gross land area of the lot commercia l or parce l w here the use is established and 1 parking space for each 2 employees, but in no case shall le ss than 10 spaces be provided. Take out restaurants 1 park ing s pace for e ach 200 square feet of gross floor area, but there without a d ri ve -through shall be no less than 5 park ing spaces provided. and without c ustomer tables (e.g., delicatessens, takeout pizza establishments, bakeries , etc.) I Terminals , freight I 1 park ing space for each 400 square fe et of gross flo or a rea. Terminals , passenger 1 park ing space for each 1 00 square feet of gross floor area in th e waiting room. Where both f re ight and passe nger fa cilities exist , th e parking faci liti es s ha ll be comp uted fo r each sepa rate ly. II http://www.sterli ngcodifiers.com/codebooklindex.php?book_i d=889 5116 511712016 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Trailer parks 1 parking space for each trailer space , plus 1 for each 4 spaces in the trailer park. Tra nsiti onal housing Parking as required per app li cable zoning district but may be reduced based upon a submitted parking study subject to approval by the director. Wa rehouses and 1 parking space for each 1 ,000 square feet of gross floor area or 1 storage facilities space for each 2 employees , w hi chever is greater and 1 park ing space for each veh icl e operated or kep t in connection with the use. Whenever a ll o r any portion of a warehouse area, facility or b ui lding is proposed to be converted, remode led or c hanged to a nonwarehouse use, the numbe r of pa rkin g spaces requ ired by this section for the intended use s hall be secured and provided prior to conversion of use or remode ling of the warehouse faci l ity or building. (1960 Code ; amd. Ord. 78-467; Ord. 88-63 1; Ord. 89-654 ; Ord. 90-663; Ord. 91-688; Ord. 93-754; Ord. 06-907 ; Ord. 12-962; Ord . 13-972) 9-1J-3: PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR USES NOT SPECIFIED: Where th e parking require me nts for a use a re not specifica ll y set forth herein , the same sha ll be determined as a cla ri ficatio n of ambiguity. (1960 Code) 9-1J-4: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS; MIXED OCCUPANCIES IN A BUILDING : In the case of mixed uses in a bui lding or on a lot, the to ta l requirements for off street parking fac ilitie s sha ll be the sum of the requirements for the various uses computed separate ly. Off street parking faci lities for one use sha ll not be considered as providing req uired parking facilities for any other use except as hereinafter specified for joint use. (1960 Code) 9-1J-5: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS; JOINT USE: The commission, upon app li cation by the owner or lessees of any property, sha ll authorize the joint use of parking faci li ties by the fo llowi ng uses or activiti es under the conditions specified herei n: A. The parking faci li ties required by this article for a use whic h is primarily a daytime use may be provid ed by the parking facilitie s of a use which is primarily a nighttime and /or Sunday use. The parking facilities required by this article for a use which is primarily a nighttime and /or Sunday use may be provided by the parking facilities of a use which is primarily a daytime use, provided such reciprocal parking area s ha ll be subject to co ndition s set fort h in subsection C of th is section . http ://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebooklindex.php?book_id=889 6/16 5117/2016 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. B. The following uses shall be deemed to be daytime uses: Banks . Business offices. Clothing or shoe repair or service shops. Manufa cturing . Personal service shops . Retail stores . Wholesale and similar uses . The follo wing uses shall be deemed to be nighttime and/o r Sunday uses: Auditorium s incidental to a public or parochial schoo l. Churches. Dance halls. Th ea ters and cock tail loun ges. C. Conditions req uired for joint use : 1. The o uter boundaries of the property upon which the use is propose d, to which th e appl ication relates, s hall be located within one hundred fifty feet (150') of such parking faciliti es . 2. The applicant shall show that th ere is no s ubstantia l conflict in the principal operating hours of the uses f o r which th e joint use of off street parking facilities is proposed. 3. Parti es concerned in the joint use of off street parking facilities s hall evi dence agreement fo r s uc h joint use by a proper leg a l in strumen t ap proved by th e city attorney as to form and conte nt. Such in strum e nt, when approved s ha ll be record e d in the office of th e county reco rd er and copies thereof filed with the building and planning d e partm en ts. (1960 Code) 9-1J-6: PLANS: Plans for a proposed parking area s hall be submitted to the building d epa rtm e nt at the tim e of the ap plic ation for the building permit for th e building to w hi c h the parking a rea is necessary. T he plans s ha ll clea rly ind icate the proposed development, including location , size , s hape , design , c urb cuts , ligh ti ng, l andscapi ng and oth er feat ure s and app urte nances of th e proposed parking lot. (1960 Code ) http:/lwww.s terlingcodifiers.com /codebook/index .php?bookjd=889 7/16 511712016 Sterling Codifiers , Inc. 9-1J-7: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKING AREAS: A. Size: 1. Residentia l Parking Spaces : a. Residential garage parking spaces s ha ll be a minimum interior dimension of ten feet (1 0') in width and twe nty fee t (20') in length. b. Required guest park ing spaces for multi-fami ly developmen ts shall be a minimum of fourteen feet (14') in width by e igh teen feet (18 ') in leng th when abutted by wa ll s o r structures on both sides . Guest park in g spaces that abut one wa ll or structure s ha ll provi de at l east twelve feet ( 12') in w idth by ei ghtee n feet (18') in length. Guest parking spaces sha ll be improved w ith grasscrete or turf block mate rial so as to be permea bl e. c. Residentia l garage parking for seco nd unit h ou sing may be provided in tandem parking spaces w ith minim um inte rior dimensions of ten feet (1 0') in width by forty feet (40') in length . d. Eac h off stree t pa ra ll el parking space s hall be at le ast twe lv e feet (12') in width and at leas t twenty feet (2 0') in le ngth. 2. Nonresidentia l Park ing Spaces : a. Standard parking s pa ces sha ll be a minimum of e igh t feet six in ch es (8'6 ") in w idth by eig ht ee n feet (18') in length. b . Compact spaces s ha ll be a minimum of e igh t feet (8 ') in width by fifteen feet (15') in le ngth . Not more than twe nty fiv e percent (25%) o f the required numbe r of parking spaces , and any pa rking spaces in excess of th e required number may be compact spaces . Compact spaces sha ll be d istributed evenly throu ghout the parking area. c . When abutted by o ne wa ll or structure , parking spaces shall provide a o n e foot six inch (1 '6") buffer on each s id e and a two f eet s ix in ch {2 '6") buffer when abutted by wa ll s on both sides. d. Ea c h off street parallel parking space s ha ll be at leas t eight fe et six inches (8'6") in wid th and at least twenty feet (20') in leng t h. 3. Bi cycle Parking Standards : a . Ea c h bicycle parking space sha ll be at least two feet (2') in width, six fee t (6 ') in length and a fiv e f oot (5 ') ais le or buffer for maneuve ring. b. New n onresiden ti a l developments sha ll provid e short te rm bi cycle parking of at least five percent (5 %) of the req uired off street parking, with a minimum of one 2-bike capaci ty rack. c. New nonresiden ti a l developments w ith te n (1 0) o r more uni ts shall also provid e long term bicycl e parking of at least fi ve percen t (5%) of the required off st reet parking . Long term bicycle parking s hall be covered , lo ckable enclosu re s wi th permanently anc h ored racks or lockable rooms with permanently a ncho red racks. d. One requi red ve hicle parking space ca n be utilize d or su bstituted to provide up to eigh t (8) bicycle spaces or two (2) motorcycle spaces , not to exceed ten percent ( 10 %) of th e required off street parking. httpJ/I.vww.sterl ingcodifiers.com /codebooklindex.php?book _id=889 8/16 5117f20 16 Sterling Codi fi ers, Inc . 4. Motorcycle Parking Standards : a . Ea c h motorcycle pa rk ing space sha ll be a t least four feet (4') in width and eight feet (8') in length. b. On e required veh icle parking space ca n be utili zed or s ubstituted to provide up to eight (8) bicycle spaces or two (2) motorcycle spaces, not to excee d ten percent (1 0%) of the req u ired off street parking . B. Access Driveways: Driveways serving parking areas for less t han six (6) ve hicles shall be a minimum of ten fe et (1 0') wide . All driveways serving parking areas for s ix (6) or more vehicles sha ll be a minimum twelve feet (12') wide. Where both egress and ingress are provided on a sing le driveway, th e minimum width sha ll be sixtee n feet (16'). Parking areas for thirty (30) or more ve h icles sha ll be provided with separate driveways for egress an d ingress , each of which shall be not le ss th a n twelve feet (12 ') in w idth . Any driveway w h ich is over one hundred twenty five feet (125') in length sha ll be not less than fiftee n feet (15 ') in width. Joint use driveways use d in combination with abutting prope rtie s shall be a ll owed when proper easements or ag reements, approved as to form by the city att orney, have been executed and filed wi th the city. All parking areas for five (5) or more veh ic les sha ll be designed so as to all ow forward motion onl y, of all vehicles e nt e ring a street , unless th e access drive is a minimum of e ightee n feet (18') in width . Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, no driveway sha ll exceed a total distan ce of three hundred feet (300 ') from a street to the parking area served . All driveways shall be maintained with a vertica l clearance of not less than thirteen feet (13 ') provided that an encroachment by eaves of not exceed in g thirty inches (30") sha ll be permitted. Utili ty meters , trash receptacles , power poles , exteri o r plumbing and othe r sim il ar facilities are exp ress ly prohibited w ithin driveway areas. C . Surfacing : All off street parking areas including driveways , aisles and access s ha ll be paved with macadam or asphaltic pave ment to a mi nimum d epth of th ree inches (3") of co nc rete to a minimu m depth of three and one -ha lf in ches (3 1/2"). Such surfacing sha ll be designed , constructed and maintained as to dispose of all s urface wate r. In no case shall such dra inage be a ll owed across public sidewalks . D. Loca tion : All off street parking facilities s hall be lo cated on the sa m e lot or complex of lots as the use which th e same are to serve , except as prov ided in section 9-1J -5 of this article. E . Setbacks: All parking a reas shall be subject to the same setback restrictions governing accessory building s as defined in the zone in which said parking area is lo ca ted , provided that no off street park ing area sha ll be loca ted closer tha n twenty feet (20') from the street right of way line of an R zo ned lo t. http:/M!ww.ster lingcodifiers.com/codebook/i ndex.php?bookjd=889 9/16 5/17!2016 Sterl ing Codifiers, Inc. F. Border Barricades: Every parking area whic h is not separated by a fence from any street or alley property l ine upon which it abuts, shall be provided with a sui tab le concrete curb or timber barrier not l ess than six inches (6") in height, located not less than three feet (3 ') distant from such street, a ll ey or property lin es. Such cu rb or barrier shall be secu re ly insta ll ed and ma intai ned; provided no such curb or barrier s ha ll be required across any driveway or entrance to such pa rki ng area. G. Screening : Every pa rk ing a rea fo r five (5) o r more vehicles which is located u pon property abutting o th e r property locate d in one of th e R zones sh a ll be separa ted from such property by a solid view obscuring fence or wa ll , six fee t (6') in heig ht, measured from th e grade of the fin ished surface of s uc h parking lot closest to th e contiguous R zone property, provided that a long the required front yard the fence or wall s hall not exceed thirty inch es (30") in height. No such wa ll , fence or hedge need be provided where the eleva tion of that portion of the parking a rea immediately adjacent to an R zoned property is six feet (6') or more be low the elevation of s uc h R zo ned property a lo ng the common property lin e. H. Li g ht s: Suita ble li g hts sha ll be provided so as to properly illuminate any parking area havin g spaces for five (5) or more vehicles o r new or used ca r sa les areas, perm itted by this c hapter; such lighting sha ll be arranged so as to re fle ct the light away from adjacent premises. I. Entrances And Exits : Th e lo cation and desig n of all entrances and exits to a s treet or all ey sha ll be subject to the approval of th e city. J . Stripi ng: All parking spaces sha ll be striped in a m anner clearly s howi ng the l ayout of the intended parki ng stall s. Such striping, not less than three inches (3") in width , sha ll be maintained in a clear, visible and orderly man ne r. K. Signs : Where required by the city, for pub li c safety, for entering or l eaving parking lots from streets, app rop riate exit, entrance and directional signs shall be posted and maintained. L. Mai nte nance And Irrigatio n : All park ing areas shall be kept clean and free of dust, mud or trash. Parking areas shall be used only for the purp ose of parking vehicles. Where landscaping is provided within or along parking areas , adequate irriga ti on and maintenance thereof shall be provided. M. Driveway De sign: All d ri veways shall comp ly with the following design requireme nts: 1. Except as otherwise provided herein, al l driveways sha ll provide unobstructed access directly to a lega l pa rk ing area or ga rage. 2. No driveway sha ll be w ider than the pa rking area o r structure it serves, provided , however, that no d ri veway located within any front or side ya rd area shall exceed twenty feet (20 ') in width except for that portion thereof located within twenty five feet (25') of the entrance to the parking st ructu re it http:llwww.slerlingcodi fi ers.com/codebooklindex.php?book_id=889 10/16 5117/20 16 Sterl ing Codi fiers , Inc. serves. In the R-1 zone , a driveway sha ll not be located at any point nearer any side property line than the parking area or garage it serves . Th is section shall no t apply to any driveway serving a parking structure or garage the entrance of which is substantially perpend icu l ar to the front property line. 3 . No vehicle or any component thereof, s h all be parked in a ny front yard area for any purpose on any R zoned lot, except in driveway areas w hich lead d irectly to a legal park ing area or garage . 4 . A circular type driveway may be co nstructed provided : a . Said driveway h as , or connects with a driveway, which has direct access to a legal parkin g area or st ru cture as defined in section 9-1J-O of thi s article; and b. The entire width of said driveway, a t some point thereon , is located entirely beh ind the requi red setback area for such zone; and c. Said driveway sha ll be a minimum of ten feet (1 0') in w idth ; and d. Notwith standi ng s ubsection M4b of this section, no c ircular driveway s ha ll exceed twe lve feet (12') in width ; and e. Ea ch driveway approach shall be a min imum of twe lve feet (12') at street level ; and f. There shall be a minimum of thirty feet (30') o f full height curb between the two (2) driveway approaches , including slopes, measured at their nearest points ; and g. No circular driveway shall be permitted o n a lot less than seventy feet (70') i n width . 5. A curb cut for a second ary driveway approach may be co n str ucted o n any lot provided : a. Said approach provides access to any dri vewa y or pa rking area which comp li es with th e provisions of th is article ; and b. Sa id approach sha ll be a minimum of twel ve feet (12') in width at stree t level ; and c. There shall be a minimum of thirty feet (30') of fu ll height curb between the two (2) driveway approaches measured at the ir nearest points. 6 . For the purposes of this sectio n, the fo ll owing definitions sha ll apply : DRIVEWAY: The improved area which is clea r of all st ructu res or portions of structures and provides access connecting an y ve hicle parking structure, lot or area with any street, alley, thoroughfares , or other right of way, wheth e r public or private. DRIVEWAY WID T H: The net width of an ind ividua l driveway, exclusive of side s lopes and returns , measured a long the c urb line of th e highway. N . Design Of Parking Areas: Off stree t parking faciliti es u ti lizing a ngled parking spaces shall comply w ith the dime ns ions specified in the following c hart and diagram. Dimensions for angles not listed sha ll be determined by interpo lation. I Angle Of Parking II Length II Cu rb Length II Depth ~~~Overall Width I http:/Avww.sterl ingcodi fi ers.com/codebook/index .php?book jd=889 11/16 -----~-----------· ------- 5/1712016 Sterl ing Codifiers, Inc. Sta nda rd parking spaces : 30 ° 18 ' 117' 1116 ' 1 ~144' 45 ° 18' 12' 111g' 1 ~152' 6 0° 1 18' g'10" 1120 ' 1 ~160' go o 1 1118 ' 118'6" ~~~1 62 ' Para ll e l 11 20 ' 11 20' 11 8'6" 1 ~1 2 7' I II Compact pa r king spaces (maximum 25 percent of required parking spaces): 30 ° 15' 16' 1114' 1 ~140' 45 ° 15' 11 '4" 11 15'6" 1 ~1 44' 60 ° 15' g'3" 1116'6" 1 ~1 4g ' go o 1 15' 8' ~~~~53' Note: 1. go degree sta ll s use two-way aisle , one-way ais le prohib ited . http:/Miww.sterli ngcodifiers .com/codebook/index.php?bookjd=889 12/16 5/1712016 Ster li ng Codifiers , Inc. ' Stall De-pth . [·~ Aisle W idth St~ll Depth , ... Overall Wid1h (1960 Code ; amd . Ord. 76-443 ; Ord. 89-654 ; Ord. 90-664 ; Ord . 95-7 84 ; Ord . 99-834 ; Ord. 05-896 ; O rd . 12-962) 9-1J-8: ABANDONED DRIVEWAYS AND CURB CUTS: http:/Jwww.sterl ingcodifiers.com/codebookli ndex.php?book J d=889 13116 5117/2016 Sterl ing Codifiers, Inc. Whenever the use of any c urb cut, curb removal , driveway or d riveway approach f rom a public street or across any pu blic pa rkway, as set forth in sect ion 9 -1 J -7 of this art icle, shall have been discontinued for a period of one hund r ed eig h ty (180) consecutive days or more, then there shall arise a rebuttable presumption that there has been an intent by the owner or user to abandon such use. The iss ue of aba ndon ment sha ll be heard a nd d etermined as pa rt of th e publ ic hearings required by section 9-1 J -9 of this article re lating to a dete rm ination of the ex istence of a public nuisance. (196 0 Code) 9-1J-9 : REPAIR OF ABANDONED DRIVEWAYS AND CURB CUTS : Whenever any curb cu t , curb remova l , driveway, or driveway approach from any public street or across any pu blic parkway shall be d eclared abandoned as set forth in section 9-1J-8 of this article, then the city may decla re the same to be a public nuisance pursuant to the procedures set forth in section 4-2C-O of this code and may order the same removed a nd/o r improved and repaired in accordance with the reg ula tions providing for t he i mprovement and repair of streets and other public places in th is city, and the cost of such repairs may be m ad e a lien against th e land in the manner provided in section 38771 et seq ., of the California Government Code . (1960 Code) 9-1J-10 : NONCONFORMING CURB CUTS AND DRIVEWAYS ; PUBLIC NUISANCE : Notwith st anding any othe r provision of this code to the contrary, a ll curb cuts, c urb removals , driveways, a nd d r iveway approaches wi th in t he ci ty of Te m p le City s hall co m p ly with the provisions of subsection 9- 1J-7M of this article within n inety (90) days from the effective date of this article. Thereafter, any curb cuts, cu r b remova ls , driveways, or driveway approaches not conforming thereto may, upon the recomme ndations of the s upe rintendent of streets, be decla red to be a public nuisance pursuant to the procedure set forth in section 4-2C-3 o f this code. The city counci l may order the curbing replaced at such locations in accordance with the provisions and regulations providing for the improvement and repair of st reets and other p u blic places in t his city, and the cost of such replacements may be made a lien agai nst the land in the m a nner provided by section 38771 e t seq., of the California Government Code . (1960 Code) 9-1J-11: LANDSCAPING INTERIOR OF PARKING AREA: A. Whe re more tha n twenty (20) automobi le pa rking spaces exist on a lot or parce l of l and, not less than two percent (2%) of the gross area utilized to s uc h parking shall be devoted to inte r ior landscaping. B. Whe re a parking area of five (5) o r more vehicles is across a street from property in any R zone, a decorative masonry wall not less than two feet (2') nor more than th ree feet (3') i n height, measured from the finished s urface of the parking area, s ha ll be erected and maintained in accordance with the applicable front ya rd setback provisions of thi s chapter, provided that a minimum of a five foot (5 ') setback from the front property line shall be observed. The setback area, between th e p roperty li ne a nd the fen ce, s ha ll be la ndscaped and con ti n uous ly m ai ntained . A site pla n sha ll be required for a ll http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebooklindex.php?bookjd=889 14/16 5/17f20 16 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. property to which this s ubsection appli es . (1960 Code) 9-1J-12 : LOCATION OF COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL PARKING FACILITIES: Off street parking facilities, not located on the same l ot as the principal use , for the us es permitted in C-2 zone and C-3 throug h M-2 zones shall be allowed as follows : A. C-2 zone: Upon a lot located within five hundred f eet (500') of the outer bounda ries of the lot upon which the principa l use so served is located; B . C-3 through M-2: Upon a lot located withi n one thous and feet (1 ,000') of the outer boundaries of the lot upon which the principa l use so served is located. ( 1960 Code) 9-1J-13: COMPREHENSIVE PLANNED FACILITIES : Areas may be exempted , in whole , in part, or conditionally, from the parking req uirements established in this title , provided : A. Such a rea shall be accurat ely described as a "district" by the planning commission and sha ll be processed as an amend m ent to section 9-1 J -14 of this article; B. No such district may be est ab lished and exempt from the provisions of section 9-1J -2 of this article un l ess at least sixty percent (60 %) of all reco rded lots withi n such proposed distri ct are then zo ned for uses first permitted in a C or M zone ; C. Such exemption when so estab lished sha ll app ly only to uses first permitted in a C or M zone ; and D. Before such defined district may be so exempted, proceedings und er applicable legislative a uthority sha ll ha ve been completed to th e extent necessary to assure provision to the exempted area of comp rehe nsive pub l ic pa rking facilit ies . (1960 Code) 9-1J-14: DISTRICTS : http://www.sterli ngcodi fiers.com /codebooklindex.php?book jd=8B9 15/16 51171201 6 Sterling Codi fiers , Inc. A. Pursuant to section 9-1J-13 of this article, the following areas a re to the extent set forth herein , exempted from the parking requirements of thi s title : 1. That certain rea l property included within th e district as set forth in ordinance 64-134 relating to vehicle parking district no . 1. 2. That certain rea l property included within the district as set forth in ordinance 64-127 relating to ve h icle park ing district no. 2. 3. That certain real property included within the district as set forth in ordinance 65-1 44 relating to vehicle parking district no. 3. 4. That certain real property included within the district as set forth in ordinance 65-149 relating to vehicle parking district no. 4. B . Such exemptions shall not apply to othe r than struc tures located within one hundred ten feet (11 0') of front property l ine . C. Such exemptions shall apply on ly with respect to floor area located at ground level. D. Such exemptions sha ll not app ly to the specific parking faci liti es required by section 9-1 J-12 of this article. (1960 Code) httpJiwww.sterlingcodifiers.com /codebookfindex.php?bookjd=889 16116 APPENDIX C URBAN LAND INSTITUTE SHARED PARKING CALCULATIONS Project Name: The Umellia Square Shopping Center Job Numbe r : 6356 M o nth ohhe Year : Ja nuary Day of t he Week: Weekday Parkin& Rates Used: Oty of Temple C•ty/Urban Land lnst•tute Customer/)I~Si tor/Guest Parking D istribut ion Time o f the Oov Commercial Retail f•ne/Usual Oinina Famitv Resuurant Karao,.e Offoce Total Peak Parkin& 67 104 82 35 7 295 Monthly Adj ustment Fact o r 56% 85% 85% 100' 100% Adjusted Peak Parking 38 88 70 35 7 6:00AM 1% 0% 25% 0' 0% 7:00AM S% 0% 50% "" 1% 8 :00 AM 15% 0% 60% O" 20% 9 :00AM 35% 0% 75% 0'!! 60% !O:OOAM 65% 15% 85% ~ 100% 11 :00 AM 85% 40% 90% u 45% 12:00 NOON 95% 75% 100% ll': 15% 1:00 PM 100% 75% 90% ll': 45% 2 :00PM 95% 65% SO% '"' 100% 3:00PM 90% 4 0% 45% ll! 45% 4 :00PM 90% SO% 45% 0" 15% 5 :00PM 95% 75% 75% " 10% 6:00PM 95% 95% 80% ~4At 5% 7:00PM 95% 100% 80% 27 2% 8:00PM 80% 100% 80% ·ll 1% 9:00 PM SO% 100% 60% 73'1! 0% 10:00 PM 30% 95% 55% 95'1 0% 11:00 PM 10% 75% SO% 100% 0% 12·00 MIO 0% 25% 25% 6f,-0% Parkin De mand: Number of Spaces T ime of t he Day Commercial Retail Fine/Casual Dining Family Rest aurant Ka raoke Office Total 6 :00AM 0 0 18 0 0 18 7 .00 AM 2 0 35 0 0 37 8 :00AM 6 0 42 0 I 49 9:00AM 13 0 53 0 4 70 !O:OOAM 25 13 60 0 7 105 11:00 AM 32 35 63 0 3 133 12:00 NOON 36 66 70 0 I 173 1:00PM 38 66 63 0 3 170 2:00PM 36 57 35 1 7 136 3:00PM 34 35 32 I 3 105 4 :00PM 34 44 32 0 I Ill 5:00PM 36 66 53 0 1 !56 6:00PM 36 84 56 8 0 184 7:00 PM 36 88 56 9 0 189 8:00PM 30 88 56 14 0 188 9:00PM 19 88 42 26 0 175 10:00 PM II 84 39 33 0 167 II 00 PM 4 66 35 35 0 140 12:00MIO 0 22 18 23 0 63 Maximum 189 Project Name: The Camellia Square Shoppi ng Center Job Number: 6356 Month of the Year: January Day of t he Week: Weekday Parking Rates Used: City of Temple City/Urban land Institute Employee/Resident Pa rking D1stnbYtion Time of the Dov Comme rci al Reta1l Fine/Casual Dmma. Familv Restau~nt (arao~.@ Offke Total P@ak Pa rkinl 14 19 14 0 8S 132 Monthly Adjustment Factor 80% 9S% 9S% 100' 100% Adjusted Peak Parking JJ 18 13 8S 6:00AM 10% 0% SO% c 3% 7:00 AM 1S% 20% 7S% 0 30% 8:00AM 40% SO% 90% 0% 7S% 9:00AM 7S% 7S% 90% 0% 9S% !O:OOAM BS% 90% 100% 0% 100% ll'OOAM 9S% 90% 100% v 100% 12:00 NOON 100% 90% 100% 0 90% 1:00PM 100% 90% 100% 0' 90% 2:00PM 100% 90% 100% -100% 3'00PM 100% 7S% 7S% '" 100% 4 :00PM 100% 7S% 7S% 0% 90% 5:00 PM 9S% 100% 9S% 0 SO% 6:00 PM 9S% 100% 9S% z• 2S% 7:00PM 9S% 100% 9S% p 10% 8:00PM 90% 100% 9S% 41 .. 7 % 9 :00PM 7S% 100% 80% 73% 3% 10:00 PM 40% 100% 6S% 95" 1% 11:00 PM 15% BS% 6S% 1 QOll. 0% 12.00 MID 0% 3S% 3S% ti6' 0% Parki n Demand: Number of Spaces T ime of t he Day Commercial Re ta1l Fine/Casual Oi ninR Family Restayrant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM 1 0 7 0 3 11 7'00AM 2 4 10 0 26 42 8 :00AM 4 9 12 0 64 89 9:00 AM 8 14 12 0 81 11S !O:OOAM 9 16 13 0 BS 123 ll'OOAM 10 16 13 0 8S 124 12:00 NOON 11 16 13 0 77 117 1:00PM 11 16 13 0 77 ll7 2:00PM 11 16 13 0 BS 12S 3'00PM 11 14 10 0 8S 120 4'00PM lJ 14 10 0 77 112 S:OO PM 10 18 12 0 43 83 6:00PM 10 18 12 0 21 61 7:00PM 10 18 12 0 9 49 8:00PM 10 18 12 0 6 4 6 9:00PM 8 18 10 0 3 39 10:00PM 4 18 8 0 1 31 11:00 PM 2 IS 8 0 0 25 12:00MID 0 6 5 0 0 lJ Maximum 125 Project Name: The Camellia Square Shopp1n1 Center Job Number: 6356 Month of the Year: February Day of t he Week: Weekday Parking Rates Used: Ctty of Temple City/Urban land Institute Customer/Visitor/Guest Parking Distnbuuon Time of the Day Commercial Retail Fine/Casual Dining Family Restaurant Karao~.~ Office Total Peak Pa r king 67 104 82 35 7 295 Monthly Ad ·ustment Factor 57% 86% 86% 1· 100% Adjusted Peak Parkin& 38 89 71 35 7 6:00AM 1% 0% 25% 0% 7:00AM 5% 0% SO% w 1% 8:00AM 15% 0% 60% 0% 20% 9:00AM 35% 0 % 75% 0% 60% !O:OOAM 65% 15% 85% 0% 100% 11:00AM 85% 40% 90% 0% 45% 12:00NOON 95% 75% 100% ,..._ 15% 1:00PM 100% 75% 90% 0% 45% 2:00PM 95% 65% SO% :% 100% 3:00PM 90% 40% 45% 2l( 45% 4:00PM 90% SO% 45% O'lC 15% 5:00PM 95% 75% 75% O'lC 10% 6:00PM 95% 95% 80% :4!< 5% 7 :00PM 95% 100% 80% 27'1: 2% 8:00PM 80% 100% 80% 41'!( 1% 9:00PM SO% 100% 60% 73'!! 0% 10:00 PM 30% 95% SS% "5" 0% 11:00 PM 10% 75% SO% 10"' 0% 12:00 MID 0% 25% 25% 66'> 0% Parkin Demand . Number of SQace s Time of the Oay Commercial Retail Fine/Casual Dining Fam1ly Restaurant Kar.~oke OffJCe T ot ill 6:00AM 0 0 18 0 0 18 7:00AM 2 0 36 0 0 38 8 :00AM 6 0 43 0 1 so 9 :00AM 13 0 53 0 4 70 !O:OOAM 25 13 60 0 7 lOS 11:00 AM 32 36 64 0 3 135 1 2:00 NOON 36 67 71 0 1 175 1:00PM 38 67 64 0 3 172 2:00PM 36 58 36 1 7 138 3:00PM 34 36 32 1 3 106 4:00PM 34 45 32 0 1 112 5:00PM 36 67 53 0 1 157 6:00PM 36 85 57 8 0 186 7:00PM 36 89 57 9 0 191 8:00PM 30 89 57 14 0 190 9:00PM 19 89 43 26 0 177 !O:OOPM 11 85 39 33 0 168 11:00 PM 4 67 36 35 0 142 12:00 MID 0 22 18 23 0 63 Maximum 191 Project Name: The Umelll~ Square Shoppine Center Job Number: 6356 Mont h of the Year: February Day of the Week: Weekday Parkins Rates Used. C•ty of Temple C•tv/Urban land Institute Employee/Resident Park ing Distnbutton Time of the Day Commercial Re t ail Fine/casual Oinimr: Family Restaurant Peak Pa rking 14 19 14 Monthlv Adjustment F~ctor 80% 9S% 95% Adjusted Peak Park1ng 11 18 13 6:00AM 10% 0% SO% 7:00AM IS% 20% 7S% 8 :00 AM 40% SO% 90% 9:00AM 7S% 7S% 90% !O:OO AM 8S% 90% 100% 11:00 AM 9S% 90% 100% 12:00 NOON 100% 90% 100% 1 :00PM 100% 90% 100% 2:00PM 100% 90% 100% 3:00PM 100% 7S% 7S% 4:00PM 100% 75% 7S% S:OO PM 95% 100% 9S% 6:00PM 9S% 100% 9S% 7:00PM 9S% 100% 9S% 8 :00PM 90% 100% 95% 9:00PM 7S% 100% 80% 10:0 0 PM 40% 100% 6S% 11:00 PM IS% 85% 65% 12:00MID 0'% 3S% 35% Porklns Demond: Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commercial Reta•l Fine/<Asual Dining Fam 1ly Restau~nt 6:00AM I 0 7 7:00AM 2 4 10 8 :00AM 4 9 12 9 :00AM 8 14 12 10:00 AM 9 16 13 11:00AM 10 16 13 12:00 NOON 11 16 13 1:00PM 11 16 13 2:00PM 11 16 13 3:00 PM 11 14 10 4 :00 PM 11 14 10 S :OO PM 10 18 12 6 :00 PM 10 18 12 7:00PM 10 18 12 8:00PM 10 18 12 9 :00PM 8 18 10 10:00 PM 4 18 8 11 :00 PM 2 IS 8 12:00MID 0 6 s Maximum l<araol<.e Office Total 0 85 132 100' 100% 8S 3% o~ 30% 0"1 7S% O'll 9S% 0% 100% 0'11 100% M 90% 0% 90% ~ 100% 2'11 100% 0'11 90% SO% .C4 2S% 2 10% Jl'lo 7% 73Y, 3% 95'11 1% ~~ 0'% 66% 0% Karaoke Office Total 0 3 11 0 26 42 0 64 89 0 81 11S 0 8S 123 0 85 124 0 77 117 0 77 117 0 85 12S 0 85 120 0 77 112 0 43 83 0 21 61 0 9 49 0 6 46 0 3 39 0 I 31 0 0 2S 0 0 11 125 Project Name. The Camellia Square Shopplne Center Job Number: 6356 Mont h of t he Year: March Day of the Week: Weekday Parlcine Rates Used City of Temple C•t y/Urban land Institute Customer/Visitor/Guest Parkln1. Distribut ion Time of the D•v Commercial Re tail Fine/casual DinlnR Familv Restaurant Kar;al"'l: Office Tota l Peok Porklna 67 10 4 82 35 7 295 Monthty Ad "ustment Factor 64% 95% 95% I OC 100% Adjust ed Pe a k Parking 4 3 99 78 35 7 6:00AM 1% 0% 25% 0% 7'00AM 5% 0% SO% lr~ 1% 8 :00 AM IS% 0% 60% 0% 20% 9:00 AM 35% 0% 75% 0'); 60% 10.00AM 65% IS% 85% 0% 100% 11 :00AM 85% 40% 90% ' 45% 12:00 NOON 95% 75% 100% r• I S% 1:00 PM 100% 75% 90% 0 45% 2 :00 PM 95% 65% SO% ~~ 100% 3'00PM 90% 40% 4 5% 2% 45% 4'00PM 90% 50% 45% 0% 15% 5 :00PM 95% 75% 75% 0 10% 6:00PM 95% 95% 80% :a 5% 7'00PM 95% 100% 80% 27 2% S'OOPM 80% 100% 80% 41 1% 9 :00PM 50% 100% 60% 73% 0% 10:00 PM 30% 95% 55% 95% 0% 11:00 PM 10% 75% 50% IC 0% 12'00MIO 0% 25% 25% 66 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Soaces T ime o f the Day Commercial Re tail Fine/casual Dining Family Restaurant Karaoke Office Tot al 6 :00AM 0 0 20 0 0 20 7'00AM 2 0 39 0 0 41 8 :00 AM 6 0 47 0 I 54 9 :0 0AM 15 0 59 0 4 78 10:00 AM 28 15 66 0 7 116 ll:OOAM 37 40 70 0 3 ISO 12:00 NOON 41 74 78 0 I 194 1:00 PM 43 74 70 0 3 190 2:00 PM 41 64 39 I 7 152 3'00PM 39 40 35 I 3 ll8 4'00PM 39 so 35 0 1 125 5 :00 PM 4 1 74 59 0 I 175 6 :00 PM 41 9 4 62 8 0 205 7 :00PM 41 99 62 9 0 21l 8 :00PM 34 99 62 14 0 209 9:00 PM 22 99 47 26 0 194 10:00 PM 13 9 4 43 33 0 183 ll:OO PM 4 74 39 35 0 152 12:00 MID 0 25 20 23 0 68 Maximum 211 Project N1me: The Umelli1 Squ1re Shoppin& Center Job Number: 63S6 Month of t he Year: M a rch Day of t he Week: Weekday Parkin& Rates Used : Gty of Temple City/Urban land lnstrtute Employee/Resident Parking Distr1button T ime of the Day Commercia l Retail Fine/Casual Dining Fa mil Restaurant Karaoke Office Total Peak Parking 14 19 14 0 8S 132 Mont hly Adju st ment F>ctor 80% 100% 100% 100' 100% Ad just ed Peak Parklna 11 19 14 8S 6:00AM 10% 0% SO% 3% 7:00 AM IS% 20% 7S% ~"' 30% 8:00AM 40% 50% 90% 0~ 7S% 9:00AM 7S% 7 S% 90% O'Y. 9S% !O:OOAM 8S% 90% 100% 0'1: 100% ll:OOAM 9S% 90% 100% !!" 100% 12:00 NOON 100% 90% 100% 0% 90% 1:00PM 100% 90% 100% 0% 90% 2:00 PM 100% 90% 100% ~" 100% 3:00PM 100% 7S % 7S% 2'K 100% 4:00PM 100% 7S% 75% ~ 90% S:OO PM 9S% 100% 9S% O'Y. SO% 6:00PM 9S% 100% 95% ~·~ 2S% 7:00PM 9S% 100% 9S% 27 " 10% 8 :00 PM 90% 100% 9S% 4 1"1 7% 9:00PM 7S% 100% 80% 7 3'1' 3% 10:0 0 PM 40% 100% 65% 95'1( 1% 11:00 PM 15% 85% 65% 100'>t 0% 12:00 MID 0% 35% 35% 66~ 0% Piirkln Demand: Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commercial Re t ail Flne/Cuual Dinino Fam ily Re staunnt Kara oke Office Total 6:00AM 1 0 7 0 3 11 7:00AM 2 4 11 0 26 43 8 :00 AM 4 10 13 0 64 91 9:00AM 8 14 13 0 81 116 !O:OOAM 9 17 14 0 8S 12S 11:00AM 10 17 14 0 85 126 12:00NOON 11 17 14 0 77 119 1:00PM 11 17 14 0 77 11 9 2:00PM 11 17 14 0 85 127 3:00PM 11 14 11 0 85 121 4:00PM 11 14 11 0 77 113 S:OO PM 10 19 13 0 43 8S 6:00PM 10 19 13 0 21 63 7:00PM 10 19 13 0 9 51 8 :00PM 10 19 13 0 6 48 9 :00PM 8 19 11 0 3 41 !O:OOPM 4 19 9 0 I 33 11:00 PM 2 16 9 0 0 27 12:00 MID 0 7 5 0 0 12 M aximum 127 Project Name : The Camellia Square Shopp •n& Center Job Number: 6356 Month of t he Year: Apnl Day of t he Week: Weekd~y Parking Rates Used : City of Temple City/Urba n L~nd Jnst1tute Customer/Visitor/Guest Pa rking Oistnbutlon Time of the Day Commercial Retail Fine/Cisu~l Dining Fam1 lv Restaurant tcarao~e Office Total Peak Parking 67 104 82 3 5 7 295 Mont hly Adjustment Foetor 63% 92% 92% 100' 100% Adjusted Peak Parkins 42 96 75 35 7 6:00AM 1" 0% 25" 0% 7:00AM S% 0% SO% ""' 1% 8:00AM 15% 0% 60% 0% 20% 9:00 AM 35% 0% 75% 0% 60% !O:OOAM 65" 15% 85% 0% 100% ll:OOAM 85% 40% 90% 0' 45% 12:00 NOON 95" 75" 100% 0% 15% 1:00PM 100% 75" 90% 0% 45% 2 :00PM 95% 65% SO% ;'ll. 100% 3:00 PM 90% 40% 45% 2% 4 5% 4:00PM 90% SO% 45% 0% 15% 5:00PM 95" 75% 75% 10% 6:00PM 95" 95% 80% .. S% 7:00PM 95% 100% 80% i 2% 8:00PM 80% 100% 80% 4}., I" 9:00PM SO% 100% 60% 73:1', 0% !O:OOPM 30% 95% SS% 95% 0% 11:00 PM 10% 75% SO% 100% 0% 12:00 MID 0% 25" 25" 66,. 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Spaces Time of t he Day Commercial Ret ail Fine/Casual Dining Fam1ly Restaurant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM 0 0 19 0 0 19 7:00 AM 2 0 38 0 0 40 8:00AM 6 0 45 0 I 52 9:00 AM IS 0 56 0 4 75 !O:OOAM 27 14 64 0 7 112 11 :00 AM 36 38 68 0 3 145 12:00 NOO N 40 72 75 0 I 188 1 :00 PM 42 7 2 68 0 3 185 2:00PM 40 62 38 1 7 148 3:00PM 38 38 34 1 3 114 4:00PM 38 48 34 0 I 121 5:00PM 40 72 56 0 1 169 6:00 PM 40 91 60 8 0 199 7:00PM 40 96 60 9 0 205 8:00PM 34 96 60 14 0 204 9:00PM 21 96 45 26 0 188 !O:OO PM 13 91 41 33 0 178 11:00 PM 4 72 38 35 0 149 12 :00 MID 0 24 19 23 0 66 Maximum 205 Project N~me: The Umelli1 Squue Shoppina Center Jo b N umber: 6356 Month of the Year : April Day of the Week: Weekda y P;uking Rates Used: C1ty of Temple City/U rban Land Institute Employee/Resdent Parkinll Distnbution Time of the Dov Commercial Retail Flne/C.sual Dining Fa mily Restaurant Karao~e Office Total Peak Park in g 14 19 14 0 85 132 M onthly Ad 'ustment Factor 80% 100% 100% 1,)~ 100% Adjust ed Peak Parking 11 19 14 85 6,QOAM 10% 0% SO% ~ 3% 7:00AM IS% 20% 75% ~ 30% 8 :00AM 40% SO% 90% 0'11 75% 9:00AM 75% 75% 90% 0'1! 95% !O:OOAM 85% 90% 100% 0% 100% li:OOAM 95% 90% 100% 0% 100% 12:00NOON 100% 90% 100% ,.. 90% 1:00PM 100% 90% 100% 0% 90% 2:00PM 100% 90% 100% ="' 100% 3:00PM 100% 75% 75% 2" 100% 4:00 PM 100% 75% 75% 0" 90% 5:00PM 95% 100% 95% 0 50% 6:00PM 95% 100% 95% .. 25% 7:00PM 95% 100% 95% 2' 10% 8:00PM 90% 100% 95% 'h 7% 9 :00PM 75% 100% 80% 73" 3% 10:00 PM 40% 100% 65% 9~ll 1% 11:00 PM 15% 85% 65% 1or 0% 12:00 MID 0% 35% 35% 56 0% Parking Demand: Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commercial Reta1l F1ne/Ysual Dining Family Restaurant Karaoke Office TotJI 6:00AM 1 0 7 0 3 11 7:00AM 2 4 11 0 26 4 3 8:00AM 4 10 13 0 64 91 9:00AM 8 14 13 0 81 116 !O:OOAM 9 17 14 0 85 125 U:OOAM 10 17 14 0 85 126 1 2:00NOON ll 17 14 0 77 119 1 :00 PM ll 17 14 0 77 119 2:00PM 11 17 14 0 85 127 3:00PM 11 14 11 0 85 121 4:00PM 11 14 11 0 77 113 5 :00PM 10 19 13 0 43 85 6 :00 PM 10 19 13 0 21 63 7 :00 PM 10 19 13 0 9 51 8 :00PM 10 19 13 0 6 48 9:00PM 8 19 11 0 3 41 !O:OOPM 4 19 9 0 I 33 11:00 PM 2 16 9 0 0 27 12:00 MID 0 7 5 0 0 12 M aximum 127 Project Name: The Cimellia Square Shopping Center Jo b Number: 6356 Month of the Year: May Day of the Week: Weekday Parklna Rates Used : C1ty of Temple City/U rban l and Institute Cus'tomer/V•s•tor/Guest Parking OistnbutHln Time of t he Day Co mm erci al Retail Fine/Cisual Dining Family Restaurant IC'a raok~ Off ice Total Peak Parklno 67 104 82 35 7 295 Monthtv Ad "ust ment Factor 66% 96% 96% 100 100% Adjust ed Puk Parkina 44 100 79 35 7 6:00AM 1% 0% 25% 0% 7:00AM 5% 0% 50% 0% 1% 8:00AM 15% 0% 60% tl'E 20% 9 :00AM 35% 0% 75% tl'E 60% 10:00 AM 65 % 15% 85% tl'E 100% 11 :00AM 85% 40% 90% 0% 45% 12:00NOON 95% 75% 100% tl'E 15% 1:00PM 100% 75% 90% ~ 45% 2:00PM 95% 65% 50% 2"' 100% 3 :00PM 90% 40% 45% '" 45% 4 :00 PM 90% 50% 45% tl'E 15% 5:00PM 95% 75% 75% 0% 10% 6:00PM 95% 95% 80% ~a 5% 7:00PM 95% 100% 80% 21~ 2% 8 :00PM 80% 100% 80% 41 ~ 1% 9:00PM 50% 100% 60% 73"' 0% 10:00 PM 30% 95% 55% 95" 0% 11:00 PM 10% 75% 50% 10" 0% 12:00 MID 0% 25% 25% 0 0% Parkins Demand: Number of Soaces T1me of the Dilly Commercial Re tail Fine/~iUII Dining Fam•ty Restaurant Kar~oke Offke Total 6:00AM 0 0 20 0 0 20 7 :00AM 2 0 40 0 0 42 8:00AM 7 0 47 0 1 55 9:00AM 15 0 59 0 4 78 !O:OOAM 29 15 67 0 7 118 11:00 AM 37 40 71 0 3 151 12:00 NOON 42 75 79 0 I 197 1:00PM 44 75 71 0 3 193 2:00PM 42 65 4 0 1 7 155 3:00PM 40 40 36 1 3 120 4:00PM 40 50 36 0 1 127 5:00PM 42 75 59 0 I 1n 6:00PM 42 95 63 8 0 208 7:00 PM 42 100 63 9 0 214 8:00PM 35 100 63 14 0 212 9:00PM 22 100 47 26 0 195 10:00 PM 13 95 43 33 0 184 11 :00 PM 4 75 40 35 0 154 12:00 MID 0 25 20 23 0 68 Mulmum 214 PrOJect Nil me: The Camellia Square Shopp ine Center Job Number: 63S6 Month of the Year : May Day of t he Week : Weekday Parkin& Rat~s Used · City of Tempi~ City/Urban land Institute Employee/Resident Parkrng D1stnbuuon Time of the Day Commercial Retail Fine/Usual Dining Fam1ly Restaurant Ka r•ot e Office Total Peak Parking 14 19 14 0 ss 132 Monthly Ad"ustment F•ctor 80% 100% 100% 1,0 100% Adjusted Peak Parting 11 19 14 ss 6:00AM 10% 0% SO% 3% 7:00AM IS% 20% 7S % o~ 30% 8 :00 AM 40% SO% 90% ~" 75% 9:00AM 75% 75% 90% 0'11 95% !O:OOAM SS% 90% 100% 0% 100% 11 :00AM 95% 90% 100% 0' 100% 12 :00 NOON 100% 90% 100% N 90% 1 :00PM 100% 90% 100% 90% 2 :00PM 100% 90% 100% 100% 3:00PM 100% 75% 75% 2% 100% 4 :00PM 100% 75% 75% 011 90% 5:00PM 95% 100% 95% 0% SO% 6:00PM 95% 100% 95% :•" 25 % 7:00PM 95% 100% 95% 27'11 10% 8:00PM 90% 100% 95% •n 7% 9 :00PM 75% 100% 80% 73T• 3% !O :OOPM 40% 100% 65% ~·5!!'· 1% 11:00PM IS% 85% 65% 100% 0% 12:00MIO 0% 35% 35% €6 .. 0% Parkin Demand· Number of Spaces Time of t he Day Commercial Retail Fine/<:asull Dining hmlly Restlurant Karaoke Office Tot1l 6:00AM 1 0 7 0 3 11 7:00 AM 2 4 11 0 26 43 8:00AM 4 10 13 0 64 91 9:00AM 8 14 13 0 81 116 !O:OOAM 9 17 14 0 85 125 11 :00 AM 10 17 14 0 ss 126 12 :00 NOON 11 17 14 0 77 119 1 :00PM 11 17 14 0 77 119 2:00PM 11 17 14 0 ss 127 3:00PM 11 14 11 0 ss 121 4 :00PM 11 14 11 0 77 113 5:00PM 10 19 13 0 43 85 6:00PM 10 19 13 0 21 63 7:00PM 10 19 13 0 9 51 8:00PM 10 19 13 0 6 48 9 :00PM 8 19 11 0 3 41 10:00 PM 4 19 9 0 I 33 11 :00 PM 2 16 9 0 0 27 12:00 MID 0 7 5 0 0 12 Maximum 127 Project Name: The Umellia Square Shoppine Center Job Number: 6356 Month of the Year : Ju ne Day o f t he Week: Weekday Parking Rates Used : Uty of Temple C•ty/Urban land Institute Customer/Visrtor/Guest Puking Otstnbution Time of the Dav Co mmercial Retail Flne/C.sual Dlnln• Family Restaurant karao._e Office Total Peak Parkin~~: 67 104 82 35 7 295 Monthl Ad 'ustment Factor 67% 95% 95% 1 ('< 100% Adjusted Peak Parkong 45 99 78 35 7 6:00AM 1% 0% 25% " 0% 7:00AM 5% 0% SO% u-.. 1% 8:00 AM 15% 0% 60% 0% 20% 9:00 AM 35% 0% 75% 0% 60% !O:OOAM 65% 15% 85% 0% 100% ll:OOAM 85% 40% 90% 0 45% 12·00NOON 95% 75% 100% c 15% 1:00PM 100% 75% 90% 45% 2:00PM 95% 65% 50% <M 100% 3:00 PM 90% 40% 45% 2% 45% 4:00PM 90% 50% 45% 0% 15% 5:00PM 95% 75% 75% Cl" 10% 6:00PM 95% 95% 80% =· .. 5% 7:00PM 95% 100% 80% n~: 2% 8:00PM 80% 100% 80% 4 1'1 1% 9:00PM 50% 100% 60% 73% 0% !O:OOPM 30% 95% 55% 9S~ 0% 11:00 PM 10% 75% 50% 100, 0% 12:00 MIO 0% 25% 25% ~.c 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commercia l Retatl Flne/C.suol Dining Family Restaurant Karaoke Offke Total 6:00AM 0 0 20 0 0 20 7:00AM 2 0 39 0 0 41 8:00AM 7 0 47 0 1 55 9:00AM 16 0 59 0 4 79 !O:OOAM 29 15 66 0 7 117 ll:OOAM 38 40 70 0 3 151 12:00 NOON 43 74 78 0 1 196 1:00PM 45 74 70 0 3 192 2:00PM 43 54 39 1 7 154 3:00PM 41 40 35 1 3 120 4:00PM 41 50 35 0 1 127 5:00PM 43 74 59 0 1 177 6:00PM 43 94 62 8 0 207 7:00PM 43 99 62 9 0 213 8:00PM 35 99 52 14 0 211 9:00PM 23 99 47 25 0 195 !O:OOPM 14 94 43 33 0 184 ll:OOPM 5 74 39 35 0 153 12:00 MID 0 25 20 23 0 58 Maximum 213 Project Name: The camellia Square Shoppmg Center Job Number: 6356 Month of the Year: June Day of t he Week: Weekday Parking Rates Used ; C1ty o f Temple City/Ur ba n land lnst1tute Employee/Resk1ent Paricln1 Oistnbution Time of the Doy Commercial Retail Fine/Casual Dining Fam 1ly Re staurant Ka raoltl!' O ffke Tota l Peak Parking 14 19 14 0 85 132 Monthl Ad "ustment Factor 80% 100% 100% lJO', 100% Adjusted Peak Parking 11 19 14 85 6 :00 AM 10% 0% 50% 3% 7 :00 AM 15% 20% 75% .,.. 30% 8 :00AM 40% 50% 90% 0% 75% 9 :00 AM 75% 75% 90% 0% 95% !O:OOAM 85% 90% 100% 0% 100% ll:OOAM 95% 90% 100% 0% 100% 12:00 NOON 100% 90% 100% 0'11. 90% 1:00PM 100% 90% 100% ~ 90% 2:00PM 100% 90% 100% 2" 100% 3:00PM 100% 7 5% 75% 2''; 100% 4:00PM 100% 75% 75% 0'11 90% 5:00 PM 95% 100% 95% 0% SO% 6:00 PM 95% 100% 95% :J% 25% 7:00PM 95% 100% 95% 27% 10% 8:00 PM 90% 100% 95% Jl% 7% 9:00 PM 75% 100% 80% 73;:. 3% 10:00 PM 40% 100% 65% 95% 1% 11:00 PM 15% 85% 65% lOu 0% 12:00MID 0% 35% 35% 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commercia l Retail Fine/Casual Dining Fam ily Restaurant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM 1 0 7 0 3 11 7:00AM 2 4 11 0 26 43 8 :00 A M 4 10 13 0 64 91 9:00AM 8 14 13 0 81 116 !O:OOAM 9 17 14 0 85 125 11:00AM 10 17 14 0 85 126 12:00 NOON 11 17 14 0 77 119 1:00PM 11 17 14 0 77 119 2:00PM 11 17 14 0 85 127 3:00PM 11 14 11 0 85 121 4 :00PM 11 14 11 0 77 113 5:00PM 10 19 13 0 43 85 6:00PM 10 19 13 0 21 63 7:00PM 10 19 13 0 9 51 8 :00PM 10 19 13 0 6 48 9 :00 PM 8 19 11 0 3 41 !O:OOPM 4 19 9 0 1 33 11:00 PM 2 16 9 0 0 27 12:00 MID 0 7 5 0 0 12 Maximum 127 ProJect Name: The Camellla Square Shoppme Center Job Number: 6356 Month of the Year: July Day of the Week: Weekday Parkin& Rates Used: City of Temple City/Urban land Institute CustomerfVtsnor/Guest Parking D1stnbutkm Time of the Day Commercia l Retail Fine/Usual Oinin11 Fa mil Restaurant Karao ~ Office Total Pe ak Pa rking 67 104 82 35 7 295 Mont htv Ad "ustment Factor 64% 98% 98% •OO' 95% Adjusted Peak Parkins 43 102 80 35 7 6:00AM !% 0% 25% ()' 0% 7:00AM 5% 0% SO% 0% 1% 8:00AM 15% 0% 60% 0% 20% 9:00 AM 35% 0 % 75% oo.< 60% !O :OOAM 65% IS% 85% 0'!: 100% 11:00AM 85% 40% 90% ~ 4 5% l2;00 NOON 95% 75% 100% a... 15% 1:00PM 100% 75% 90% ~ 45% 2:00PM 95% 65% SO% ~ 100% 3:00PM 90% 40% 45% l'!: 45% 4:00PM 90% SO% 45% 0'1!. 15% 5;00 PM 95% 75% 75% ~ 10% 6:00PM 95% 95% 80% :•" 5% 7:00PM 95% 100% 80% 17~ 2% 8:00 PM 80% 100% 80% •1>: 1% 9:00PM SO% 100% 60% 73'1: 0% 10:00 PM 30% 95% 55% 9SlE 0 % 11:00 PM 10% 75% SO% 100'!1 0% 12:00 MID 0% 25% 25% 66'1 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Spaces Time of the Oay Commercial Retail Fine/Casual Dining Fam 1ly Restaurant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM 0 0 20 0 0 20 7;00 AM 2 0 40 0 0 42 8:00AM 6 0 48 0 I 55 9:00AM 15 0 60 0 4 79 !O:OOAM 28 15 68 0 7 !l8 11:00AM 37 41 72 0 3 153 12:00 NOON 41 77 80 0 l 199 1:00PM 43 77 72 0 3 195 2:00PM 41 66 40 I 7 155 3:00PM 39 41 36 I 3 120 4:00PM 39 51 36 0 I 127 5:00PM 41 77 60 0 l 179 6:00PM 41 97 64 8 0 210 7:00 PM 41 102 64 9 0 216 8:00PM 34 102 64 14 0 214 9:00PM 22 102 48 26 0 198 10:00 PM 13 97 44 33 0 187 11:00 PM 4 77 40 35 0 !56 12:00 MID 0 26 20 23 0 69 Maximum 216 Project Name: The ~melha Square Shopping Center Job Number: 6356 Month ofthe Year: July Day of t he Week : Weekday Parking Rates Used: Oty of Temple City/Urban lancllnst•tvte Employee/Resident Parking Di.stnbutton Time of the D•v Commercial Retail Fine/Casual DininR fa mil Restaurant Karaoke Office Total Peak Parking 14 19 14 0 85 132 Monthlv Ad ustment F•ctor 80% 100% 100% 100' 95% Adjusted Pea k Parking 11 19 14 81 6:00AM 10% 0% 50% ~ 3% 7 :00AM 15% 20% 75% a. 30% 8 :00AM 40% 50% 90% 0% 75% 9:00AM 75% 75% 90% 0% 95% !O:OOAM 85% 90% 100% ~ lOll% 11:00 AM 95% 90% 100% 0 100% 12:00 NOON 100% 90% lOll% 0' 90% 1:00PM 100% 90% 100% 0 90% 2:00PM 100% 90% 100% c'< 100% 3:00PM 100% 75% 75% 2'1: 100% 4:00PM 100% 75% 75% ~ 90% 5:00PM 95% 100% 95% 0 50% 6:00PM 95% 100% 95% '4 25% 7:00PM 95% 1()0% 95% 2 10% 8:00PM 90% 100% 95% J, 7% 9:00PM 75% 100% 80% 73" 3% 10:00 PM 40% 100% 65% 95" 1% 11:00 PM 15% 85% 65% 1~ 0% 12:00MID 0% 35% 35% ... 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commercia l Retail Fine/Casual Dining Fam ily Restaurant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM 1 0 7 0 2 10 7:00AM 2 4 11 0 24 41 8:00AM 4 10 13 0 61 88 9:00AM 8 14 13 0 77 112 !O:OOAM 9 17 14 0 81 121 11:00AM 10 17 14 0 81 122 12:00NOON 11 17 14 0 73 115 1:00 PM 11 17 14 0 73 115 2;00 PM 11 17 14 0 81 123 3:00PM 11 14 11 0 81 117 4·00 PM 11 14 11 0 73 109 5:00PM 10 19 13 0 41 83 6:00PM 10 19 13 0 20 62 7:00PM 10 19 13 0 8 50 8:00PM 10 19 13 0 6 48 9:00PM 8 19 11 0 2 40 10:00 PM 4 19 9 0 1 33 1100 PM 2 16 9 0 0 27 12:00 MID 0 7 5 0 0 12 Maximum 123 Project Name: The Umell~ Square Shopping Center Job Number: 6356 M onth of t he Year: Aug ust Day o f the Week: Weekday Parking Rates Used: Ctty of Temple C1ty/Urban Land Instit ute Customer/Vis •tor/Guest Parking Oistnbuuon Time of the Oov Co mmerci al Retail Fine/Casual OlnlnR Famllv Restaurant Karao~.e Office Total Peak Parking 67 104 82 35 7 295 Monthl Ad 'ustment Factor 69% 99% 99% 1~ 95% Adjusted Peak Parkine 46 103 81 35 7 6 :00AM 1% 0% 25% " 0% 7 :00 AM 5% 0% 50% O>i 1% 8:00AM 15% 0% 60% 0% 20% 9 :00AM 3 5% 0% 75% 0'< 60% !O :OO AM 65% 15% 85% 011 100% ll:OOAM 85% 40% 90% 0' 4 5% 12 :00NOON 95% 75% 100% u 15% 1:00PM 100% 75% 90% ;; 45% 2:00PM 95% 65% 50% .... 100% 3 :00 PM 90% 40% 45% 2'11 45% 4:00PM 90% 50% 45% 0" I S% 5:00PM 95% 75% 75% 0 10% 6:00PM 95% 95% 80% '4 5% 7:00PM 95% 100% 80% 2% 8:00PM 80% 100% 80% 41-.. 1% 9:0 0PM 50% 100% 60% 7N 0% !O :OOPM 30% 95% 55% 95'11 0% ll:OOPM 10% 75% 50% 100% 0% 12:00MIO 0% 25% 25% 66'!1. 0% Parkin Demand : Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commerc ial Reta.l Fine/Casual OinlnR Family Restaurant Karaoke Office Tot al 6:00AM 0 0 20 0 0 20 7:00AM 2 0 41 0 0 43 8:00AM 7 0 49 0 1 57 9:00AM 16 0 61 0 4 81 10:00 AM 30 15 69 0 7 121 ll:OOAM 39 41 73 0 3 156 12 :00 NOON 44 77 81 0 1 203 1 :00PM 46 77 73 0 3 199 2:00PM 44 67 41 1 7 160 3:00PM 41 41 36 I 3 122 4 :00PM 41 52 36 0 I 130 5 :00 PM 44 77 61 0 1 183 6 :00 PM 44 98 65 8 0 215 7 :00 PM 44 103 65 9 0 221 8 :00PM 37 103 65 14 0 2 19 9:00PM 23 103 49 26 0 201 10:00 PM 14 98 45 33 0 190 11:00 PM 5 77 41 35 0 158 12:00 MID 0 26 20 23 0 69 Ma.xlmum 221 Project Name: The Umellia Square Shoppinc Center Job Number: 63S6 Month o f the Year: Aucust Day of the Week: Weekday Parkine Rates Used: Ctty of Temple C1tv/Urban Land Institute Employee/Resldent P1rkin1 DistnbutiOn Time of the Day Commercia l Re t ail Fine/Usual Dining Family Restaurant Karao~e Office Tot1l Peak Pa r king 14 19 14 0 8S 132 Monthly AdJustment Foetor 80% 100% 100% 100' 9S% Adjusted Peak. Partin& 11 19 14 81 6:00AM 10% 0% SO% o~ 3% 7:00AM 1S% 20% 7S% 0% 30% 8 :00AM 40% SO% 90% 0:1' 7S% 9:00AM 7S% 7S% 90% 0% 9S% !O:OOAM 8S% 90% 100% 0% 100% 11:00AM 9S% 90% 100% 0% 100% 12:00 NOON 100% 90% 100% 0"' 90% 1:00PM 100% 90% 100% ~ 90% 2:00PM 100% 90% 100% 2': 100% 3:00PM 100% 7S% 7S% 2ll 100% 4 :00 PM 100% 7S% 7S% O'l( 90% S:OO PM 9S% 100% 9S% 00: SO% 6:00PM 9S% 100% 9S% "·~ 2S% 7:00PM 9S% 100% 9S% 27ll 10% 8:00PM 90% 100% 9S% ., .. 7% 9:00PM 7S% 100% 80% 73'1< 3% 10:00 PM 40% 100% 6S% 95'>: 1% 11:00 PM IS% 8S% 6S% I~ 0% 12:00 MID 0% 3S% 3S% 6f 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Spaces Time of the D11y Commercial Retail fine/~sual Dining Family Rest'Jurant Karaoke Offke Total 6:00AM I 0 7 0 2 10 7:00AM 2 4 11 0 24 41 8:00AM 4 10 13 0 61 88 9:00AM 8 14 13 0 77 112 10:00 AM 9 17 14 0 81 121 11:00AM 10 17 14 0 81 122 12:00 NOON 11 17 14 0 73 liS 1:00PM 11 17 14 0 73 11S 2:00PM 11 17 14 0 81 123 3:00PM 11 14 11 0 81 117 4 :00PM 11 14 11 0 73 109 S:OO PM 10 19 13 0 41 83 6:00PM 10 19 13 0 20 62 7 :00PM 10 19 13 0 8 so 8:00PM 10 19 13 0 6 48 9:00PM 8 19 11 0 2 40 10:00 PM 4 19 9 0 I 33 11:00 PM 2 16 9 0 0 27 12:00 MID 0 7 s 0 0 12 Muimum 123 Project Name: The camellia Square Shoppine Center Job Number: 6356 Month o f the Year: September Day of the Week: Weekday Parklne Rates Used · City of Temple City/Urban land Institute Cu.stomer/Vis •tor/Guest Park ing DistributiO n Time of t he Doy Comm ercial Retail Fine/Usual Dining Famfl Restaurant K arao ~. Office Total Peak ParkinB 67 104 82 35 7 295 Monthly Adjustment Factor 64% 91% 91% luO' 100% Adjusted Peok Porl<ong 43 95 75 35 7 6:00AM 1% 0% 25% 0% 7:00AM 5% 0% 50% 0 1% 8 :00AM IS% 0 % 60% 0'1 20% 9 :00 AM 35% 0% 75% O'l( 60% !O:OOAM 65% 1 5% 85% OlE 100% 11:00 AM 85% 40% 90% 0~ 45% 12:00 NOON 95% 75% 100% Dll IS% 1:00PM 100% 75% 90% O'G 45% 2:00PM 95% 65% 50% 211 100% 3:00PM 9 0% 40% 45% 2% 45% 4:00PM 90% SO% 45% "' 15% 5:00PM 95% 75% 75% 1)': 10% 6 :00PM 95% 95% 80% :•ll 5% 7 :00PM 95% 100% 80% 27ll 2% 8:00PM 80% 100% 80% 41ll 1% 9:00 PM 50% 100% 60% 73': 0% 10:00 PM 30% 95% 55% 95'11 0% 11:00 PM 10% 75% 50% 100'!1 0% 12:00 MID 0% 25% 25% EEl! 0% Parkin Demand . Number of Spaces Time o f the Doy Commercial Ret.11 11 Fine /Ca su.11l Dining Famtly Restaurant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM 0 0 19 0 0 19 7 :00AM 2 0 38 0 0 40 8:00AM 6 0 45 0 1 52 9 .00AM IS 0 56 0 4 75 10:00 AM 28 14 64 0 7 113 11:00AM 37 38 68 0 3 146 12:00 NOON 41 71 75 0 1 188 1:00PM 43 71 68 0 3 185 2:00PM 41 62 38 1 7 149 3:00 PM 39 38 34 1 3 liS 4 :00PM 39 48 34 0 I 122 5:00PM 4 1 71 56 0 I 169 6 :00PM 41 90 60 8 0 199 7:00 PM 41 95 60 9 0 205 8 :00 PM 34 95 60 14 0 203 9 :00PM 22 95 45 26 0 188 10:00 PM 13 90 41 33 0 tn 11:00 PM 4 71 38 35 0 148 12:00 MID 0 24 19 23 0 66 Maximum 205 Project Name: The Camellia Square Shoppine Center Job Number: 6356 Month of the Year : September Day of t he Week: Weekday Park ing Rates Used : City o f Temple City/Urban land Inst it ute Employee/ResM:fent PartcinR Distnbution Time of the Dav Commercial Retatl Fine/Ca sual DininR Fam ily Resliurant Karaoke Offk e Total Peak Parking 14 19 14 0 85 132 Monthl Adjustment Factor 80% 100% 100% h''l' 100% Adjusted Puk Pa rking 11 19 14 85 6:00AM 10% 0% 50% 3% 7:00AM 15% 20% 75% c 30% 8 :00AM 4 0% 50% 90% 0% 75% 9 :0 0 AM 75% 75% 90% ern 95% !O:OOAM 85% 90% 100% 0% 100% ll:OOAM 9 5% 90% 100% 100% 12 :00NOON 100% 90% 100% 90% 1 :00PM 100% 90% 100% . 90% 2 :00PM 100% 90% 100% . -~ 100% 3 :00PM 100% 75% 75% 2'11 100% 4 :00PM 100% 75% 75% 0% 90% 5:00PM 95% 100% 95% c-5 0% 6:00PM 9 5% 100% 95% ·"' 25% 7:00PM 95% 100% 95% " 10% 8 :00PM 90% 100% 95% 41 7% 9 :00PM 7 5% 100% 80% 73% 3% !O:OOPM 40% 100% 65% 95% 1% 11 :00 PM 15% 85% 65% 100% 0% 12:00 MID 0% 35% 35% bt> 0% Parkin Demand ; Num ber o f Spaces Time of the Day Co mmercial Retail Fine/Casual Dmln g hmtl y Re sta unmt Karaoke Off ice To tal 6 :00AM 1 0 7 0 3 11 7 :00AM 2 4 11 0 26 43 8:00AM 4 10 13 0 64 91 9 :00AM 8 14 13 0 81 116 !O:OOAM 9 17 14 0 85 125 11:00 AM 10 17 14 0 85 126 12 :00 NOO N 11 17 14 0 77 119 1:00PM 11 17 14 0 77 119 2 :00PM 11 17 14 0 as 127 3·00 PM 11 14 11 0 85 121 4 :00PM 11 14 11 0 77 113 S:OOPM 10 19 13 0 43 85 6 :00PM 10 19 13 0 21 63 7:00PM 10 19 13 0 9 51 8 :00PM 10 19 13 0 6 48 9:00PM 8 19 11 0 3 41 10:00 PM 4 19 9 0 1 33 11:00 PM 2 16 9 0 0 27 12:00 MID 0 7 s 0 0 !2 Maximum 127 Project Name: The Camelll.a Square Shoppin1 Center Job Number: 6356 M onth o f the Year: October Day of t he Week: Weekday ParkSng Rates Used Oty of Temple City/Urba n land Institute Customer/Visitor/Guest Parkin2 Oistnbudon Time of the Day Comme rcial Retail Fine/Casual Dining Fa mily Restaurant l<araoke Office Toto I Pe ak Parking 67 104 82 35 7 295 Mont hly Ad 'ustment Factor 66% 96% 96% I 100% Adjusted Peak Parkin1 44 100 79 35 7 6:00AM 1% 0% 25% 0% 7:00AM 5% 0% 50% 0% 1% 8:00AM 15% 0% 60% ()'It, 20% 9:00 AM 35% 0% 75% 0% 60% !O :OOAM 65% 15% 85% 0% 100% 11:00AM 85% 40% 90% Do/, 45% 12:00NOON 95% 75% 100% (W, 15% 1:00PM 100% 75% 90% 0% 45% 2:00PM 95% 65% 50% 21: 100% 3:00PM 90% 40% 45% 2'~'· 45% 4:00PM 90% 50% 45% o .. 15% 5:00PM 95% 75% 75% ()'>!, 10% 6:00PM 95% 95% 80% ::o/ 5% 7:00PM 95% 100% 80% 27" 2% 8:00PM 80% 100% 80% Jl'l!. 1% 9 :00PM 50% 100% 60% 7l% 0% 10:00 PM 30% 95% 55% 95% 0% 11 :00 PM 10% 75% 50% 100% 0% 12 :00 MID 0% 25% 25% 66% 0% Parkin1 Demand: Number of Soaces Time of the Day Commercial Reta ~l f ine/Casual Oi n1ng Family Restaun~nt Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM 0 0 20 0 0 20 7 :00AM 2 0 40 0 0 42 8:00AM 7 0 47 0 I 55 9 :00AM 15 0 59 0 4 78 !O:OOAM 29 15 67 0 7 118 11:00AM 37 40 71 0 3 151 12:00 NOON 42 75 79 0 1 197 1:00 PM 44 75 71 0 3 193 2:00 PM 42 65 40 1 7 15 5 3:00PM 40 40 36 1 3 120 4 :00PM 40 50 36 0 I 127 5:00PM 42 75 59 0 1 177 6:00PM 42 95 63 8 0 208 7:00PM 42 100 63 9 0 214 8:00PM 35 100 63 14 0 212 9:00PM 22 100 47 26 0 195 !O:OOPM 13 95 43 33 0 184 11 :00 PM 4 75 40 35 0 154 12:00 MID 0 25 20 23 0 68 Maximum 214 Project Name: The Camellia Square Shoppinc Center Job Number: 6356 Month of t he Year: October Day of the Week: Weekday Parkinc Rates Used: City of Temple Citv/Urban land Ins titute Employee/Resodent Parking Oistnbuhon Time of the Day Commercial Retail Fine/casual Dining Family Restaurant Karack@o Office Total Peak Parkin• 14 19 14 0 85 132 Monthl Ad .ustment Factor 80% 100% 100% 100' 100% Adjusted Peak Parkong 11 19 14 85 6:00 AM 10% 0% 50% U>< 3% 71JOAM 15% 20% 75% 0% 30% 8:00AM 40% 50% 90% Oo/.o 75% 9:00AM 75% 75% 90% 0% 95% !O:OOAM 85% 90% 100% 0% 100% 11:00 AM 95% 90% 100% 0% 100% 121JO NOON 100% 90% 100% 0"-90% 1:00PM 100% 90% 100% CY.': 90% 2:00PM 100% 90% 100% ?'1: 100% 3:00PM 100% 75% 75% 2'1: 100% 4:00PM 100% 75% 75% 0"' 90% 5:00PM 95% 100% 95% ~ 50% 6:00PM 95% 100% 95% -· 25% 7:00PM 95% 100% 95% c 10% 8:00 PM 90% 100% 95% 4h. 7% 9:00PM 75% 100% 80% 13'1: 3% 10:00 PM 40% 100% 65% 95~ 1% 11:00 PM 15% 85% 65% !." 0% 12:00 MID 0% 35% 35% 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Spaces T ime of the Day Commercial Reta il F1ne/Cisual Dining Famdy Restaurant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM 1 0 7 0 3 11 7:00AM 2 4 11 0 26 43 8 :00AM 4 10 13 0 64 91 9:00AM 8 14 13 0 81 116 101JOAM 9 17 14 0 85 125 11:00AM 10 17 14 0 85 126 12.00 NOON 11 17 14 0 77 119 1:00PM 11 17 14 0 77 119 2:00PM 11 17 14 0 85 127 3:00PM 11 14 11 0 85 121 4 :00 PM 11 14 11 0 77 113 5:00PM 10 19 13 0 43 85 6 :00PM 10 19 13 0 21 63 7:00PM 10 19 13 0 9 51 8:00PM 10 19 13 0 6 48 9 :00 PM 8 19 11 0 3 41 10:00 PM 4 19 9 0 1 33 11:00 PM 2 16 9 0 0 27 12:00 MID 0 7 5 0 0 12 Maximum 127 Project N~me : The Umelll~ Squ~re Shoppinl Center Job Nu mber: 6356 Month of the Year: November Day of the Week: Weekday Parking Rates Used: C•tv of Temple City/Urban Land Institute Customer/Visitor/Guest Parkmg DistributiOn Time of the o~v Commercial Retail Fine/Usual Oini na Fam•lv Rest~urant Karaoke Office Total Pea k Pa rking 67 104 82 35 7 295 Monthly AdJustment Factor 72% 93% 93% !NY 100% Adjusted Peak Parkms 48 97 76 35 7 6:00AM 1% 0% 25% 0% 7:00AM S% 0% SO% c 1% 8:00 AM 15% 0% 60% Ol< 20% 9:00AM 35% 0% 75% ~· 60% !O:OOAM 65% 15% 85% 0:>! 100% 11:00 AM 85% 40% 90% 0% 45% 12:00 NOON 95% 75% 100% .,.. IS% 1:00PM 100% 75% 90% ~ 45% 2:00PM 95% 65% SO% 2'11 100% 3:00 PM 90% 40% 45% 2'1 45% 4 :00 PM 90% SO% 45% 0'!1 15% 5 :00PM 95% 75% 75% 011 10% 6:00PM 95% 95% 80% c•" 5% 7 :00PM 95% 100% 80% 2711 2% 8:00PM 80% 100% 80% 41 " Ill 9:00 P M SO% 100% 60% 73:>! 0% 10:00 PM 30% 95% 55% 95'i 0% 11:00 PM 10% 75% SO% 100% 0% 12:00 MID 0% 25% 25% E6% 0% P~rkin Demand: Number of S~ces Time of the Day Commercial Reta il Fine/Usul.l Oinina Famtly Re staurant Karaoke Offke Total 6:00AM 0 0 19 0 0 19 7 :00AM 2 0 38 0 0 40 8 :00AM 7 0 46 0 1 54 9 :00 AM 17 0 57 0 4 78 !O:OOAM 31 IS 65 0 7 118 11:00AM 41 39 68 0 3 lSI 12:00 NOON 46 73 76 0 I 196 1:00 PM 48 73 68 0 3 192 2:00 PM 46 63 38 1 7 ISS 3:00PM 43 39 34 1 3 120 4:00PM 43 49 34 0 1 127 5:00PM 46 73 57 0 1 177 6:00PM 46 92 61 8 0 207 7:00PM 46 97 61 9 0 213 8 :00PM 38 97 61 14 0 210 9:00PM 24 97 46 26 0 193 10:00 PM 14 92 42 33 0 181 11:00 PM 5 73 38 35 0 151 12:00 MID 0 24 19 23 0 66 Maximum 213 Project Name: The ~mellia Square Shopping Center Job Number: 6356 Month of thl! Vur: November Day o f the Week: Weekday Parking Rates Used: City of Temple City/Urban land Inst it ute Employee/Resident Puklnt. Oist nbvtJOn Time of the Dav Co mmercial Retail Fine/Usual Oinimt FamilY Restaurant Peak Parklno 14 19 14 Monthl Ad ·ustment Factor 90% 100% 100% Adjusted Peak Parl<inc 13 19 14 6 :00AM 10% 0% 50% 7.00AM 15% 20% 75% 8 :00AM 40% 50% 90% 9:00 AM 75% 75% 90% !O :OOAM 85% 90% 100% 11 :00AM 95% 90% 100% 12:00 NOON 100% 90% 100% 1:00PM 100% 90% 100% 2:00PM 100% 90% 100% 3:00PM 100% 75% 75% 4 :00PM 100% 75% 75% 5:00PM 95% 100% 95% 6:00PM 95% 100% 95% 7:00PM 95% 100% 95% 8:00PM 90% 100% 95% 9:00PM 75% 100% 80% !O:OOPM 40% 100% 65% 11:00 PM 15% 85% 65% 12:00 MID 0% 35 % 35% Parkin Demand : Number of Spaces Time of the DAy Comm ercial Reuu l Fine/Casu1l OininR. Family Rut11urant 6:00AM 1 0 7 7:00 AM 2 4 11 8 :00AM 5 10 13 9:00AM 10 14 13 !O:OO AM 11 17 14 11:00 AM 12 17 14 12 :00 NOON 13 17 14 1:00PM 13 17 14 2:00PM 13 17 14 3 :00PM 13 14 11 4 :00 PM 13 14 11 5:00PM 12 19 13 6 :00PM 12 19 13 7 :00PM 1 2 19 13 8 :00PM 12 19 13 9 :00PM 10 19 11 10:00 PM 5 19 9 11:00 PM 2 16 9 12 :00 MID 0 7 5 Maximum Kar3o~-e Office Tot11l 0 85 132 tau-100% 85 -3% "" 30% Oili 75% 0% 95% 0% 100% u 100% 90% " 90% 2' 100% 2'11 100% 0% 90% Oili 50% 141< 25% 27'11. 10% 41 '11. 7% 7311 3% 95% 1% 1"' 0% ~6 0% Karaoke Office Total 0 3 11 0 26 4 3 0 64 92 0 81 118 0 85 127 0 85 128 0 77 121 0 77 121 0 85 129 0 85 123 0 77 115 0 4 3 87 0 21 65 0 9 53 0 6 so 0 3 43 0 1 34 0 0 27 0 0 12 129 ProJect Name: The Camellia Square Shoppina: Center Job Number: 6356 Month of t he Year: December Day o f t he Week: Weekday Parkins Rates Used· City of Temple City/Urban land lnstttute Customer/Visitor/Guest ParkinR Dtstnbuuon Time of the Day Commercial Retail Flne/C.sual Dinino Fa mil Restaurant Peak Pa rkin• 67 104 82 Mont hly Adjustment Factor 100% 100% 100% Adjust ed Peak Parking 67 104 82 6:00AM l ()% 25% 7:00AM 5-()% 50% 8:00AM 15,, 0% 60% 9:00AM 30'11 0% 75% !O:OOAM 55'11 15% 85% ll:OOAM 75'!1 40% 90% 12:00NOON 90% 75% 100% 1:00PM 100% 75% 90% 2:00PM 100% 65% 50% 3:00PM 100% 40% 45% 4 ·00 PM 95% SO% 45% 5:00PM 25 75% 75% 6:00PM !>('' 95% 80% 7:00PM 100% 80% 8:00PM 65',. 100% 80% 9:00PM 50% 100% 60% 10:00 PM 30% 95% 55% 11:00 PM •u 75% 50% 12:00MID 0' 25% 25% Parkin Demand : Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commercial Retatl Fine/Casual Dining Famtly Restaurant 6:00AM 1 0 21 7:00 AM 3 0 41 8:00AM 10 0 49 9:00 AM 20 0 62 10:00 AM 37 16 70 11:00 AM so 4 2 74 12:00 NOON 60 78 82 1:00PM 67 78 74 2:00PM 67 68 41 3:00PM 67 42 37 4:00PM 64 52 37 5:00PM 57 78 62 6:00PM 54 99 66 7:00PM 50 104 66 8:00PM 44 104 66 9 :00 PM 34 104 49 10:00 PM 20 99 45 11:00 PM 7 78 41 12:00 MID 0 26 21 Maximum Karao~ _ Office Tot al 35 7 295 10~ 100% 35 7 () ()% Cl': 1% 0% 20% 0% 60% ()lt, 100% 45% "' 15% c 45% .~ 100% l% 4 5% Cl': 15% " 10% . 5% 27 2% 4h. 1% 73'1: 0% 951( 0% 1~ ()% 661( 0% Karaoke Office Toul 0 0 22 0 0 44 0 1 60 0 4 86 0 7 130 0 3 169 0 1 221 0 3 222 1 7 184 1 3 150 0 1 154 0 1 198 8 0 227 9 0 229 14 0 228 26 0 213 33 0 197 35 0 161 23 0 70 229 Projec-t Name: The Camellia Square Shopp•n& Center Job Number: 6356 Month of the Year: December Day of t he Week: Weekday Parkin& Rates Used: C1ty of Temple City/Urban land lnstttute Employee/Restdent Parking Distnbuuon Time of the D•v Commercial Reta •l Fine/Usual Oinlne: Fam1lv Restaurant Karaoke Office Tot"JI Peak Pa rklnR 14 19 14 0 85 132 Monthly Ad 'ustment Factor 100% lOll% 100% ! lOll% Adjusted Peak Parkin& 14 19 14 85 6 :00 AM 10% 0% 50% 0% 3% 7:00AM 15% 20% 75% 0% 30% 8 :00AM 4 0% 50% 90% Olio 75% 9 :00AM 75% 75% 90% 0% 95% !O:OOAM 85% 90% 100% 0% lOll% ll:OO AM 95% 90% 100% 0" lOll% 12:00NOON 100% 90% 100% Oll 90% 1 :00 PM 100% 90% 100% 0% 90% 2:00PM 100% 90% 100% ="' lOll% 3 :00PM 100% 75% 75% 2% 100% 4 :00PM 100% 75% 75% 0% 90% 5:00PM 95% l Oll% 95% 0% 50% 6 :00PM 95% 100% 95% =·" 25% 7:00PM 95% 100% 95% 27'11 10% 8 :00PM 90% 100% 95% 4111 7% 9 :00PM 75% 100% 80% n~ 3% 10:00 PM 40% 100% 65% 95" 1% 11:00 PM 15% 85% 65% lOll% 0% 12:00 MID 0% 35% 35% 66% 0% Parkin Demand: Number o f Spaces T ime of the Day Commercial Reta il Fine/Cisual DininR Family Restaurant Karaoke Otr.ce Toto! 6 :00 AM 1 0 7 0 3 11 7 :00 AM 2 4 11 0 26 43 8:00AM 6 10 13 0 64 93 9:00AM 11 14 13 0 8 1 119 !O:OOAM 12 17 14 0 85 128 11:00AM 13 17 14 0 85 129 12:00 NOO N 14 17 14 0 77 122 1:00PM 14 17 14 0 77 122 2:00PM 14 17 14 0 85 130 3:00 PM 14 14 11 0 85 124 4:00PM 14 14 11 0 77 116 5:00 PM 13 19 13 0 43 88 6:00PM 13 19 13 0 21 66 7:00PM 13 19 13 0 9 54 8:00PM 13 19 13 0 6 51 9:00 PM 11 19 11 0 3 4 4 10:00 PM 6 19 9 0 1 35 11:00 PM 2 16 9 0 0 27 1200MID 0 7 5 0 0 12 Maximum 130 Project Name: The camellia Square Shopping Ce nter Job Number: 6356 Month of th e Year: late December Day o f the Week: Weekday Parkin1 Rates Used: Oty of Temple City/Urban Land Institute Customer/Visitor/Guest Park1n1 Oist nbut5o n Time of the Day Commercial Retail Fine/Usual Dinln1 hmlty Restaura nt l<ar3ol..e Office Total P .. k Porklng 67 104 82 35 7 295 Monthtv Ad·u stment Factor 80% 95% 95% .c 80% Adjusted Peak Parkmg 5 4 99 78 35 6 6:00AM 1 0% 25% 0% 7 :00AM "· 0 % 50% ~ .. 1% 8 :00AM 10'1: 0% 60% Oll 20% 9 :00AM 20'!1 0 % 75% C"< 60% 10 :00 AM 40"' 15% 85% 0'1 100% !1:00AM 65 40% 90% 0 4 5% 12:00 NOON 90 75% 100% 0 15% 1:00 PM 10< 75% 90% 45% 2:00PM I~ 65% 50% .... 100% 3:00PM 100'!<. 40% 45% '" 45% 4:00PM 95" SO% 45% ()'!<, 15% 5:00PM 5 75% 75% oJ' 10% 6:00PM 7'" 95% 80% 2• 5% 7:00PM 55 100% 80% 2' 2% 8:00PM 40 ... 100% 80% 4, 1% 9:00PM 25" 100% 60% 73'!< 0% 10:00 PM 15% 95% 55% 95% 0% 11:00 PM ' 75% 50% 100'); 0% 12:00 MI D ~ 25% 25% 66" 0% Parkin Demand : N umber of Spaces T ime of the Day Commercial Retail Fine/Usual Dining Family Restilurant Karaoke OffK:e Total 6 :00AM 1 0 20 0 0 21 7:00AM 3 0 39 0 0 42 8:00AM 5 0 47 0 I 53 9:00AM 11 0 59 0 4 74 !O:OOAM 22 15 66 0 6 109 !1:00AM 35 40 70 0 3 148 12:00 NOON 49 74 78 0 1 202 1 :0 0PM 54 74 70 0 3 201 2:00PM 54 64 39 1 6 164 3:00PM 54 40 35 1 3 133 4:00PM 51 50 35 0 1 137 5:00PM 46 7 4 59 0 1 180 6:00PM 38 9 4 62 8 0 202 7:00PM 30 99 62 9 0 200 8:00PM 22 99 62 14 0 197 9 o00 PM 14 99 47 26 0 186 10:00 PM 8 94 43 33 0 178 !1:00PM 3 7 4 39 35 0 151 12:00MID 0 25 20 23 0 68 Maximum 202 Project Name· The Camellia Square Shopprng Center Job Number: 6356 Month o f the Year: Late December Day of the Week: Weekday Parking Rates Used : City of Temple City/Urban land Instit ute Employee/Reskfent Parki~& Oistnbution Time of the Dav Commercial Reta rl Fine/casual Dining Family Restaurant Karaoke Offoce Total Peak Parking 14 19 14 0 85 132 Monthly Adjustment Fact or 90% 100% 100% 80% Adjusted Peak Par1<mg 13 19 14 68 6:00 AM 10% 0% 50% 3% 7:00AM 15% 20% 75% " 30% 8 :00AM 4()% 50% 90% 0'10 75% 9:00AM 75% 75% 90% ()':> 95% !O:OOAM 85% 90% 100% 0" 100% !1:00 AM 95% 90% 100% 0 100% 12 :00 NOON 100% 90% 100% 90% 1:00PM 100% 90% 100% 90% 2 :00PM 100% 90% 100% "" 100% 3 :00PM 100% 75% 75% <'II 100% 4:00PM 100% 75% 75% 0% 90% 5:00PM 95% 100% 95% 50% 6:00PM 95% 100% 95% -· 25% 7:00PM 95% 100% 95% 2 10% 8:00PM 90% 100% 95% 4 1~ 7% 9:00PM 75% 100% 80% 73l(o 3% !O :OOPM 40% 100% 65% 9S'r· 1% !1:00PM IS% 85% 65% 100 0% 12:00MI D 0% 35% 35% .. 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Spaces Time of the Day Comme rcia l Retail Fine /Usual Dining Family Restaurant ka raoke Otfke Total 6:00AM 1 0 7 0 2 10 7:00AM 2 4 11 0 20 37 8:00AM s 10 13 0 51 79 9:00AM 10 14 13 0 65 102 !O :OOAM 11 17 14 0 68 110 11:00 AM 12 17 14 0 68 Ill 12:00 NOON 13 17 14 0 61 105 1:00PM 13 17 14 0 6 1 l OS 2:00PM 13 17 14 0 68 112 3:00PM 13 14 11 0 68 106 4:00PM 13 14 11 0 61 99 SOOPM 12 19 13 0 34 78 6:00PM 12 19 13 0 17 61 7:00PM 12 19 13 0 7 51 8:00PM 12 19 13 0 s 49 9:00PM 10 19 11 0 2 42 10:00 PM s 19 9 0 1 34 11 :00 PM 2 16 9 0 0 27 12:00 MID 0 7 s 0 0 12 Maximum 112 Project Name : The Camellia Sqyare Shoppina Center Job Number: 6356 Month ofthe Year: Januuy Day of t he Week: Weekend Parkin& Rates Used: City of Temple City/Urba n land Institute CYstomerNisttor/Guest Parklne Distribution Time of the Dov Commercial Reta il Flne/C.sual Dinina Fimtfv Restiu~nt l<araoke Office Toto I Peak Porking 74 116 116 61 0 367 Monthly Ad 'ustment Fictor 56" 85" 85" 1U' 100% Adjusted Puk Parting 41 99 99 61 6 :00AM 1" 0" 10% ~ 0% 7:00AM 5" 0" 25" o·. 20% 8 :00 AM 10% 0" 45" 0!1 60" 9:00AM 30" 0% 70% 0!1 80% !O:OOAM 50% 0% 90% 0!1 90% 11 :00 AM 65% 15% 90% o• 100% 12:00 NOON 80% 50% 100% 0" 90% 1:00PM 90% 55% 85% 80% 2:00PM 100% 45% 65% 14'" 60% 3 :00PM 100% 45% 40% 21!1 40% 4 ·00 PM 95% 45% 45% 22!1 20% 5:00PM 90% 60% 60% 0 10% 6:00PM 80% 90% 70% IS 5% 7:00PM 75% 95% 70% 35 0% 8 :00PM 65% 100% 65% 5. 0% 9:00PM 50% 90% 30% 70·"' 0% 10:00 PM 35% 90% 2S% 100% 0% 11 :00 PM 15% 90% IS% gq 0% 12:00 MID 0% SO% 10% 81 0% Parkina Demand : Number of Spaces Time of the D1y Commercial Retail Fine/Usual Dining Family Restaurant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM 0 0 10 0 0 10 7 :00AM 2 0 25 0 0 27 8 :00 AM 4 0 4S 0 0 49 9:00AM 12 0 69 0 0 81 10:00 AM 21 0 89 0 0 110 ll:OOAM 27 15 89 0 0 131 12:00 NOON 33 50 99 0 0 182 1:00PM 37 54 84 0 0 175 2 :00 PM 41 4 5 64 8 0 ISS 3 :00PM 41 4 5 40 13 0 139 4:00PM 39 4 5 4S 13 0 142 5 :00PM 37 59 59 13 0 168 6:00PM 33 89 69 11 0 202 7 :00PM 31 94 69 21 0 215 8:00PM 27 99 64 32 0 222 9 :00PM 21 89 30 43 0 183 10:00 PM 14 89 25 61 0 189 11 :00 PM 6 89 IS 60 0 170 12 :00 MID 0 50 10 49 0 109 Maxlmum 222 Project Name: The Camellia Square Shoppinc Center Job N umber: 63S6 Month of the Year: J1nua ry Day of t he Week: Weekend Parkln1 Rates Used: Uty of Temple City/Urban Land Institute Employee/Restdent Parking Oistnbuuon Time of the Dav Commercial Retail Fine/Casual Oininli Fa mil Restaurant Karao~t Office Tot11l Peak Pa rkin• 18 21 21 0 9 69 Mont~ly_Ad"ustment Factor 80% 95% 95% 100' 100% Adjusted Peak Paltinc 14 20 20 9 6:00AM 10% 0% 50% UN 0% 7 :00AM 15% 20% 75% 0'11 20% 8:00AM 40% 30% 90% 0% 60% 9 :00AM 75% 60% 90% 0% 80% 10 :00AM 85% 7 5% 100% 0% 90% 11 :00AM 95% 75% 100% ~ 100% 12 :00 NOON 100% 75% 100% 90% 1:00PM 100% 75% 100% u 80% 2:00PM 100% 7 5% 100% 1-'• 60% 3:00PM 100% 75% 75% 11'1:-40% 4:00 PM 100% 75% 75% :.!'II 20% 5:00PM 95% 100% 95% n" 10% 6:00 PM 85% 100% 95% 18'11 5% 7 :00PM 80% 100% 95% )5% 0% 8:00PM 75% 100% 95% sm 0% 9 :00PM 65% 100% 80% 7~ 0% 10:00 PM 45% 100% 65% 100% 0% 11 :00 PM 15% 85% 65% 99~ 0% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 35% s:.-. 0% Parkin Demand : Number o f Spaces Time o f t he Day Commercial Reta1l Fine/Casual Dining Fam1ly Re staur11nt Karaoke Office Total 6 :00AM 1 0 10 0 0 11 7 :00 AM 2 4 15 0 2 23 8 :00AM 6 6 18 0 5 35 9 :00AM 11 12 18 0 7 48 lO :OOAM 12 15 20 0 8 55 11 :00 AM 13 15 20 0 9 57 12:00 NOON 14 15 20 0 8 57 1:00 PM 14 15 20 0 7 56 2 :00 PM 14 15 20 0 5 54 3 :00PM 14 15 15 0 4 48 4:00PM 14 15 1 5 0 2 46 5 :00PM 13 20 19 0 1 53 6 :00 PM 12 20 19 0 0 51 7 :00 PM 11 20 19 0 0 50 8 :00 PM 11 20 19 0 0 50 9:00PM 9 20 16 0 0 45 10;00 PM 6 20 13 0 0 39 11 .00 PM 2 17 13 0 0 32 12:00 MID 0 10 7 0 0 17 Maximum 57 Proj ect Name: The Camellia Square Shopping Center Job Numbe r: 6356 Month of the Year: February Day o f the We ek: Weekend Park in1 Rates Used: City of Temple Ci ty/Urban land Institute Customer/Visitor/Guest Parking Olstnbutton T ime of the Oav Commercial Reta 1l Fone/<Asual Olnong Fam1ly Restau~nt ICarao~e Offoce Tot11l Puk Porkin1_ 74 116 116 61 0 367 Mont hly Ad 'ustment hctor 57% 86% 86% IOQ-100% Adjust ed Peak p.,tmc 42 100 100 61 6:00AM 1% 0% 10% 0% 7:00AM 5% 0% 25% o ... 20% 8:00AM 10% 0% 45% 0% 60% 9:0 0AM 30% 0% 70% 0% 80% !O :OO AM 50% 0% 90% ~ 90% 11 :00 AM 65% 15% 90% c 100% 12:00 NOON 80% 50% 100% 0 90% 1:00PM 90% 55% 85% 80% 2:00PM 100% 45% 65% I• 60% 3:00PM 100% 45% 40% 21" 40% 4:00PM 95% 45% 45% z:" 20% 5:00PM 90% 60% 60% 11 10% 6:00PM 80% 90% 70% 18 5% 7:00PM 75% 95% 70% 'IS 0% 8 :00 PM 65% 100% 65% 5-0% 9 :00PM 50% 90% 30% 70~ 0% 10:00 PM 35% 90% 25% lOIN 0% 11:00 PM IS% 90% 15% 99 0% 12:00 MID 0% SO% 10% 81 0% Parking Demand: Number of Spaces Time o f the Day Commercial Retail Hne/Cisual Dining Fam1ly Re st11urant Karaoke Office Total 6 :00AM 0 0 10 0 0 10 7:00AM 2 0 25 0 0 27 8 :00 AM 4 0 45 0 0 49 9 :00 AM 13 0 70 0 0 83 !O:OOA M 21 0 90 0 0 111 11:00AM 27 15 90 0 0 132 12:00 NOO N 34 so 100 0 0 184 1:00 PM 38 55 85 0 0 178 2:00 PM 4 2 45 65 8 0 160 3:00PM 4 2 45 40 13 0 140 4 ·00 PM 40 45 4 5 13 0 143 5 :00PM 38 60 60 13 0 171 6:00PM 34 90 70 11 0 205 7:00PM 32 95 70 21 0 218 8 :00 PM 27 100 65 32 0 224 9:00PM 21 90 30 43 0 184 10:00 PM IS 90 25 61 0 191 11 :00 PM 6 90 I S 60 0 171 12:00 MI D 0 50 10 49 0 109 Maxim um 224 Project Name: The Camellia Square Shopping Center Job Number: 6356 Month of the Year: February Da y of t he Week: Weekend Park lne Rates Used: City of Temple C1ty/Urban Land Institute Time of the Dav Commercial Reta 1l f ine/C.sual Dinino Peak Park in.: 18 21 Monthly Ad ·ustment Factor 80% 95% Adjusted Peak Parl<inc 14 20 6:00AM 10% 0% 7:00AM 15% 20% 8:00AM 40% 30% 9:00AM 75% 60% !O:OOAM 85% 75% 11:00 AM 95% 75% 12:00 NOON 100% 75% 1·00 PM 100% 75% 2:00PM 100% 75% 3:00PM 100% 75% 4 :00PM 100% 75% 5:00PM 95% 100'11 6:00PM 85% 100% 7:00 PM 80% 100% 8:00PM 75% 100% 9:00PM 65% 100% 10:00 PM 45% 100% 11:00 PM 15% 85% 12:00 MID 0% SO% Parkin Time of the Oay Commercial Reta il Fme/Casual Dining 6:00AM I 0 7 .00 AM 2 4 8 :00 AM 6 6 9:00AM 11 12 !O:OOAM 12 I S 11:00 AM 13 IS 12:00 NOON 14 15 1:00PM 14 15 2:00PM 14 15 3:00PM 14 15 4:00PM 14 IS 5 :00PM 13 20 6:00PM 12 20 7:00PM 11 20 8 :00PM II 20 9:00PM 9 20 10:00 PM 6 20 11 :00 PM 2 17 12:00 MID 0 10 Maximum Emp loyee/Restdent Parking D ist nbution Familv Restau111nt Karao~e Office TOtilll 21 0 9 69 95% 1u 100% 20 9 SO% 0% 75% u·~ 20% 90% 0% 60% 90% 0'11 80'11 100% 0'11 90'11 100% 0% 100% 100% !W· 90% 100% 0% 80% 100% 14'1(, 60% 75% 21"' 40% 75% 1:" 20% 95% 21'\ 10% 95% 1S~ 5% 95% 35'1! 0% 95% 52% 0% 80% 7Cl' 0% 65% 100'll 0% 65% 9 0% 35% 11 0% Demand: Number of Spaces Fam1ly Re sta u~nt Karaoke Offke Total 10 0 0 11 15 0 2 23 18 0 5 35 18 0 7 48 20 0 8 55 20 0 9 57 20 0 8 57 20 0 7 56 20 0 s 54 15 0 4 48 15 0 2 46 19 0 I 53 19 0 0 51 19 0 0 so 19 0 0 so 16 0 0 45 13 0 0 39 13 0 0 32 7 0 0 17 57 Project Name: The Came II ~a Square Shop pin& Center Jo b Numb er: 6356 Mont h of the Year: March Day of the Week: W e ekend Pa rking Rat es Used: C1ty of Temple City/Urban land Institute Cust omer/Visitor/Guest ParkinR DistributiOn Time of t he Dav Commercial Retail Fine/Casual Oinin11: Fa mil Restaurant Karao~e Offi<e Total Puk PorklnR 74 116 116 61 0 367 Montb!Y Ad'ustment Factor 64% 95% 95% ·"-100% Adjusted Peak Parlune 47 110 110 61 6:00AM 1% 0% 10% 0% 7:00AM 5% 0% 25% 0'\oo 20% 8:00AM 10% 0% 45% 0% 60% 9:00 AM 30% 0% 70% 0% 80% !O:O OAM SO% 0% 90% O'Y. 90% 11:00 AM 65% 15% 90% " 100% 12:00 NOON 80% SO% 100% 0 90% 1:00PM 90% 55% 85% c 80% 2:00PM 100% 45% 65% 1· 60% 3.00PM 100% 45% 4()% 2a 40% 4:00PM 95% 45% 45% 2~ 20% 5:00PM 90% 60% 60% 21 10% 6:00PM 80% 90% 70% 5% 7:00PM 75% 95% 70% ' 0% 8:00PM 65% 100% 65% 'H 0% 9:00PM 50% 90% 30% I OlE 0% 10:00 PM 35% 90 % 25% 10~ 0% 11:00 PM I S% 90% IS% 99' 0% 12:00 M ID 0% SO% 10% 31 0% Parkin Demand: Number of SDaces Time of the Day Comme rcia l Reuul Flnetc .. ual Olnin• Family Restaur-ant Karaoke Office Total 6.00AM 0 0 11 0 0 11 7-QOAM 2 0 28 0 0 30 8:00AM 5 0 so 0 0 55 9-QOAM 14 0 77 0 0 91 !O:OOAM 24 0 99 0 0 123 ll:OOA M 31 17 99 0 0 147 12:00 NOON 38 55 110 0 0 203 1:00PM 42 6 1 94 0 0 197 2:00PM 47 so 72 8 0 177 3:00PM 47 so 44 13 0 154 4:00 PM 45 so so 13 0 158 5:00PM 42 66 66 13 0 187 6:00PM 38 99 77 11 0 225 7:00PM 35 105 11 21 0 238 8:00PM 31 110 12 32 0 245 9:00PM 24 99 33 43 0 199 10:00 PM 16 99 28 61 0 204 11:00 PM 7 99 17 60 0 183 12:00 M ID 0 55 11 49 0 115 Maximum 245 Proj ect Name: The camellia Square Shoppine Center Job Number: 6356 Month of the Year: March Day of the Week: Weekend Pa rking Rates Used : City of Temple City/U rb an land lnst1tute Employ ee/Res d ent Parking Oistributton Time of the Oav Commercial Retail Flne/C.sual Dinin• Fam1lv Restaurant Karao._~ Office Total Peak Parkina 18 2! 2! 0 9 69 Monthty Ad 'ustment Factor 80% 100% 100% I 100% Adjusted Peak Puking 14 2! 21 9 6:00AM 10% 0% SO% 0% 7:00AM IS% 20% 7S% (> 20% 8:00 AM 40% 30% 90% 01! 60% 9 :00 AM 7S% 60% 90% 0% 80% !O:O OAM 8S% 7S% 100% O'l; 90% 11:00AM 9S% 7S% 100% " 100% 12:00 NOON 100% 7S% 100% 0' 90% 1:00PM 100% 7S% 100% 80% 2:00PM 100% 7S% 100% .~~ 60% 3:00PM 100% 7S% 7S% 21'11 4()% 4:00PM 100% 7S% 7S% ~~ 20% S:OO PM 9S% 100% 95% 2! 10% 6 :00 PM 85% 100% 95% !8' 5% 7 :00PM 80% 100% 95% 0% 8 :00PM 75% 100% 95% s ... 0% 9 :00PM 65% 100% 80% 7(» 0% 10:00 PM 45% 100% 65% 100% 0% 11 :00 PM IS% 85% 65% 9> 0% 12 :00 MID 0% 50% 35% 81 0% Parkin Demand ; N um ber of Spaces Time of the Day Commercial Retail Fine/Casual Dining Family Restaurant Karaoke Office Total 6 ·00AM I 0 11 0 0 !2 7:00AM 2 4 16 0 2 24 8:00AM 6 6 19 0 s 36 9:00AM 11 13 19 0 7 so !O:OOAM 12 16 21 0 8 57 11 :00AM 13 16 2 1 0 9 59 12 :00 NOON 14 16 21 0 8 59 1:00 PM 14 16 21 0 7 58 2:00PM 14 16 21 0 5 56 3:00PM 14 16 16 0 4 50 4:00PM 14 16 16 0 2 48 5:00PM 13 21 20 0 I 55 6:00PM 12 21 20 0 0 53 7:00PM 11 21 20 0 0 52 8:00 PM 11 21 20 0 0 52 9 :00 PM 9 21 17 0 0 47 10:00 PM 6 21 14 0 0 41 11:00 PM 2 18 14 0 0 34 12 :00 MID 0 11 7 0 0 18 Maximum 59 Project Name: The camellia Square Shopping Center Job Number: 6356 Mont h of t he Year: April Day o f t he W eek: Weekend Parking Rates Used: Ctty of Temple Cit•//Urban land Institute Customer/Visitor/Guest Parkin~~: D•stnbution Time of t he Dav Commercial Retail Fine/Casual Dinin2 Fam1lv Resta urant ICaraul Offke To~ I Peak Parkin• 74 116 116 61 0 367 Mont hlv AdJust ment Factor 63% 92% 92% 1~~ 100% Adjust ed Peak Park.inc 47 107 107 61 6:00AM 1% 0% 10% ~ 0% 7:00AM 5% 0% 25% "" 20% 8:00AM 10% 0% 45% O'lf 60% 9:00AM 30% 0% 70% Ol( 80% !O:OOAM 50% 0% 90% Ol( 90% 11:00AM 65% 15% 90% 0, 100% 12:00NOON 80% 50% 100% 90% 1:00 PM 90% 55% 85% 80% 2:00PM 100% 4 5% 65% 14 60% 3:00PM 100% 45% 40% 21'lf 40% 4:00PM 95% 45% 45% =~" 20% 5:00PM 90% 60% 60% 21 10% 6:00PM 80% 90% 70% 18 5% 7:00PM 75% 95% 70% 3 0% 8:00PM 65% 100% 65% 5l 0% 9:00PM 50% 90% 30% 70lj 0% 10:00 PM 35% 90% 25% 100% 0% 11:00 PM 15% 90% 15% 99 0% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 10% 8 1 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commercial Retail Fine/C.uual OininR Family Restau rant Ka raoke Offke To~ I 6:00AM 0 0 11 0 0 11 HlO AM 2 0 27 0 0 29 8:00AM 5 0 48 0 0 53 9-QOA M 14 0 75 0 0 89 !O:OOAM 24 0 96 0 0 120 11:00AM 31 16 96 0 0 143 12:00 NOON 38 54 107 0 0 199 1:00PM 42 59 9 1 0 0 192 2:00PM 47 48 70 8 0 173 3:00 PM 47 48 43 13 0 151 4:00 PM 45 48 48 13 0 !54 5:00PM 42 64 64 13 0 183 6:00 PM 38 96 75 11 0 220 7:00PM 35 102 75 21 0 233 8:00PM 31 107 70 32 0 240 9:00PM 24 96 32 43 0 195 !O:OOPM 16 96 27 61 0 200 li:OOPM 7 96 16 60 0 179 12:00MIO 0 54 11 49 0 114 Maximum 240 Project Name: The Camellia Square Shopp•ne Center Job Number: 6356 Month o f the Year: April Day o f t he Week: Weekend Parking Rates Used: OtyofTemple Cit y/Urban land Institute Employeo/Rosidont Parldn1 Oistnbut iOn Time of the Day Commercial Retail Fine/casual OininR Fam1lv Restaurant Kar<~f'lk~ Offko Total Peak Parkin& 18 21 21 0 9 69 Monthty Ad ustment F1ctor 80% 100% 100% tr' 100% Adjusted Peak Parlcing 14 21 21 9 6:00AM 10% 0% 50% 0% 7:00AM IS% 20% 75% 0', 20% 8:00AM 40% 30% 90% 00: 60% 9:00 AM 75% 60% 90% 0~ 80% !O:OOAM 85% 75% 100% 0~ 90% II:OOAM 95% 75% 100% 0'11 100% 12;00 NOON 100% 75% 100% 0"' 90% 1:00PM 100% 75% 100% O'lt 80% 2:00PM 100% 75% 100% ~~-. 60% 3:00PM 100% 75% 75% 21!E 40% 4 ;00 PM 100% 75% 75% ~~" 20% 5 :00PM 95% 100% 95% 21ll 10% 6:00PM 85% 100% 95% 1S4 5% 7:00 PM 80% 100% 95% 35'1 0% 8:00 PM 75% !00% 95% 52!E 0% 9:00 PM 65% 100% 80% 70'1 0% 10:00 PM 45% 100% 65% 100'" 0% 11:00 PM IS% 85% 65% 9 0% 12:00 MID 0% SO% 35% 31 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commercial Retail Fine/Clsuoitl Dining Family Restauroilnt Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM 1 0 II 0 0 12 7:00AM 2 4 16 0 2 24 8 :00 AM 6 6 19 0 5 36 9·00AM II 13 19 0 7 so !O:OOAM 12 16 21 0 8 57 II:OOAM 13 16 21 0 9 59 12:00 NOON 14 16 21 0 8 59 1:00 PM 14 16 21 0 7 58 2:00 PM 14 16 21 0 5 56 3 :00 PM 14 16 16 0 4 so 4:00PM 14 16 16 0 2 48 5:00PM 13 21 20 0 1 55 6:00PM 12 21 20 0 0 53 7:00PM II 21 20 0 0 52 8:00PM 11 21 20 0 0 52 9:00PM 9 21 17 0 0 47 10:00 PM 6 21 14 0 0 41 11:00 PM 2 18 14 0 0 34 12:00 MID 0 II 7 0 0 18 Maxim um 59 Project Name: The Camellia Square Shopping Center Job Number: 6356 Month of the Year : May Day of t he Week: Weekend Parking Rates Used: City of Temple Ci ty/Urban land I nst itute Customer/VIsitor/Guest Puking Distribution Time of the Day Commercia l Reta tl Fine/Usual Oinlna: Fam ilv Restaurant ll:ar;.,.,h Office Total Puk Parkin• 74 116 116 61 0 367 Monthly Ad 'ustment Futor 66% 96% 96% I 100% Adjusted Peak Parking 49 111 111 61 6:00AM 1% 0% 10% 0% 7:00AM 5% 0% 25% V•• 20% 8:00AM 10% 0% 45% 0% 60% 9:00AM 30% 0% 70% ~ 80% !O:OOAM SO% 0% 90% 0% 90% ll:OOAM 65% 15% 90% ()'!!. 100% 12:00NOON 80% SO% 100% Ci"· 90% 1:00PM 90% 55% 85% ~ 80% 200PM 100% 45% 65% 14 '1: 60% 3 .00 PM 100% 45% 40% 2 1'JE 40% 4:00PM 95% 45% 45% ~~ 20% 5:00PM 90% 60% 60% d 10% 6:00PM 80% 90% 70% I S 5% 7:00PM 75% 95% 70% " 0% 8:00PM 65% l OO'IE 65% •" OlE 9:00PM 50% 90% 30% 70'JE 0 % 10:00 PM 35% 90% 25% l OC" 0% 11:00 PM 15% 90% 15% q 0% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 10% ' 0% Parkin Demand: Nomber of Spaces Time of the Day Commercial Re t atl Fme /Casual Dining Family Restaurant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM 0 0 11 0 0 11 7:00AM 2 0 28 0 0 30 8:00AM 5 0 50 0 0 55 9:00AM 15 0 78 0 0 93 !O:OOAM 25 0 100 0 0 125 11:00 AM 32 17 100 0 0 149 12:0 0 NOON 39 56 111 0 0 206 1:00 PM 44 61 94 0 0 199 2:00 PM 49 50 72 8 0 179 3:00PM 49 50 44 13 0 156 4 :00PM 47 50 50 13 0 160 5:00PM 44 67 67 13 0 191 6:00PM 39 100 78 11 0 228 7:00PM 37 105 78 21 0 241 8 :00PM 32 Ill 72 32 0 247 9:00PM 25 100 33 43 0 201 10:00 PM 17 100 28 61 0 206 11:00 PM 7 100 17 60 0 184 12:00 MID 0 56 11 49 0 116 Maximum 247 Project Name: The camellia Square Shopping Center Job N umber: 63S6 Month of the Year: May Day of t he Week: Weekend Parking Rates Used: C;ty of Temple Clt v/Urban Land lnst•tute Emp loyee/Resident Parkin& Distribution Time of the Day Commercial Retail Flne/C.sual DlninR Fam•tv Restaurant Ka raol e Offoce Total Peak P1rkma 18 21 21 0 9 69 Monthlv Adiustment Factor 80% 100% 100% 11 100% Adjusted Peak Parkm1 14 21 21 9 6:00 AM 10% 0% 50% 0% 7:00AM 15% 20% 75% u· •• 20% 8:00AM 40% 30% 90% 0% 60% 9:00AM 75% 60% 90% 0"' 80% !O:OOAM 85% 75% 100% 0" 9 0% ll:OOAM 95% 75% 100% o-100% 12:00NOON 100% 75% 100% 90% 1:00 PM 100% 75% 100% u 80% 2:00PM 100% 75% 100% 14>< 60% 3:00 PM 100% 75% 75% 21" 4()% 4 :00PM 100% 75% 75% Z2'1 20% 5:00PM 95% 100% 95% 21" 10% 6 :00 PM 85% 100% 95% '"" 5% 7:00PM 80% 100% 95% 35" 0% 8 :00 PM 75% 100% 95% 52" 0% 9:00PM 65% 100% 80% 70" 0% 10:00 PM 45% 100% 65% 100% 0% 11:00 PM I S% 85% 65% 79 0% 12:00MID 0% SO% 35% 8 1 0% Park in Demand: Number of Space s Time of the Day Commerc ial Reta il Fine/Usual Di ning Family Re sUurant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM 1 0 11 0 0 12 7 :00AM 2 4 16 0 2 24 8:00AM 6 6 19 0 5 36 9 :00AM 11 13 19 0 7 50 !O:OOAM 12 16 21 0 8 57 ll:OO AM 13 16 21 0 9 59 12:00 NOON 14 16 21 0 8 59 1:00 PM 14 16 21 0 7 58 2 :00 PM 14 16 21 0 s 56 3 :00PM 14 16 16 0 4 50 4:00PM 14 16 16 0 2 48 5 :00PM 13 21 20 0 1 55 6:00PM 12 21 20 0 0 53 7 :00PM 11 21 20 0 0 52 8 :00PM 11 21 20 0 0 52 9 :00PM 9 21 17 0 0 47 10:00 PM 6 21 14 0 0 41 11:00 PM 2 18 14 0 0 34 12 :00 MID 0 11 7 0 0 18 Maximum 59 Project Name: The <:amell1' Square Shopplnc Center Job Number: 6356 Month of t he Year: June Day of the Week: Weekend Pa rking Ra tes U sed : City of Temple Cit y/U rban l and lnst1tute Cust omer/Visitor/Guest Parking Dlstnbutk>n Time of the Dav Comm ercial Ret1il Fine/C.suai Dinino F,m,lv Rutaur~nt Ka.raoh_ Office Total Peak Park1n1 74 116 116 61 0 367 Monthtv Adlusunent Factor 67% 95% 95% 10. 100% Adjusted Peak Porking 50 110 110 6 1 6:00 AM 1% 0% 10% " 0% 7:00 AM 5% 0% 25% c 20% 8:00AM 10% 0% 45% 0% 60% 9:00AM 30% 0% 70% 0% 80% !O:OO AM 50% 0% 90% Co/. 90% 11:00 AM 65% 15% 90% c 100% 12:00 NOON 80% 50% 100% ~ 90% 1:00PM 90% 55% 85% 0 80% 2:00PM 100% 45% 65% •• 60% 3:00PM 100% 45% 40% ll~ 40% 4:00PM 95% 45% 45% ll~ 20% 5:00PM 90% 60% 60% ll 10% 6:00PM 80% 90% 70% }:-5% 7:00PM 75% 95% 70% 35 0% 8:00PM 65% 100% 65% 5< 0% 9:00 PM 50% 90% 30% 70% 0% 10:00 PM 35% 90% 25% 10~ 0% 11:00 PM 15% 90% 15% ,; 0% 12:0 0 MID 0% 50% 10% 81 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commercial Re t ail Fane/casual Dinint: Family Restaurant Karaoke Offtce To till 6:00AM 1 0 11 0 0 12 7:00AM 3 0 28 0 0 31 8:00AM 5 0 50 0 0 55 9:00AM 15 0 77 0 0 92 !O:OOAM 25 0 99 0 0 124 ll:OO AM 33 17 99 0 0 149 12:00NOON 40 55 110 0 0 205 1:00PM 45 6 1 94 0 0 200 2:00PM 50 50 72 8 0 180 3.00 PM 50 so 44 13 0 157 4:00PM 48 so so 13 0 161 5:00 PM 45 66 66 13 0 190 6:00PM 40 99 77 11 0 227 7:00PM 38 lOS 77 21 0 241 8:00PM 33 110 72 32 0 247 9:00 PM 25 99 33 43 0 200 !O:OO PM 18 99 28 6 1 0 206 11:00 PM 8 99 17 60 0 184 1 2.00 M ID 0 55 11 49 0 115 Maximum 247 ProJect Name: The Cimellia Square Sh opping Center Job Number: 6356 Mont h o f the Year: June Day of the Week: Weekend Parking Rates Used: Ctty of Temple Cit y/Urban land Institute Employee/Resident Parkin& DistnbutiOn Time of the Day Commercial ReU11I Fine/Casual Dining Family Restaurant Karaoke Offke Total Peak Parkm& 18 21 2 1 0 9 69 Monthly Ad "ustment Factor 80% 100% 100% l~O 100% AdJusted Peak Parking 14 21 21 9 6·00AM 10% 0% 50% 0% 7:00AM 15% 20% 75% u 20% 8 :00 AM 40% 30% 90% 0~ 60% 9 :00AM 75% 60% 90% O'; 80% !O:OOAM 85% 75% 100% 0'1 90% !1:00AM 95% 75% 100% 100% 12:00 NOON 100% 75% 100% 90% 1:00PM 100% 75% 100% 80% 2:00 PM 100% 75% 100% l J '< 60% 3:00PM 100% 75% 75% 21" 40% 4:00PM 100% 75% 75% 22'1 20% 5:00PM 95% 100% 95% "· 10% 6 :00PM 85% 100% 95% !E. 5% 7:00PM 80% 100% 95% ,s 0% 8:00PM 75% 100% 95% 52,. 0% 9 :00PM 65% 100% 80% 70il 0% 10:00 PM 45% 100% 65% 1000' 0% 11 :00 PM 15% 85% 65% 9!. 0% 12:00 MID 0% SO% 35% 8 1 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commercial Retail Fine/usual Dining Famity Restaurant Karaoke Offke Total 6:00AM 1 0 11 0 0 12 7:00AM 2 4 16 0 2 24 8:00AM 6 6 19 0 5 36 9 :00 AM 11 13 19 0 7 so !O:OOAM 12 16 21 0 8 57 !1:00 AM 13 16 21 0 9 59 12 :00 NOON 14 16 21 0 8 59 1:00 PM 14 16 21 0 7 58 2:00 PM 14 16 21 0 5 56 3 :00PM 14 16 16 0 4 50 4 :00 PM 14 16 16 0 2 48 5:00PM 13 21 20 0 1 55 6 :00 PM 12 21 20 0 0 53 7 :00PM 11 21 20 0 0 52 8:00PM 11 21 20 0 0 52 9 :00 PM 9 21 17 0 0 4 7 10:00 PM 6 21 14 0 0 41 11:00 PM 2 18 14 0 0 34 12 :00 MID 0 11 7 0 0 18 Muimum 59 Project Name: The Umellia Square Shoppinc Center Jo b Number: 6356 Month of the Year: July Day of t he Week: Wee~end Parking Rates Used: Ctty of Temple City/Urban land lnstttute Customer/Visttor/Guest Partin& Dtstrtbution Time of the Day Commercial Reta il Ftne/Usual Dinin2 Fam1lv Resuurant tcarao._e Office Tot> I Peak Parkma 74 116 116 61 0 367 Monthly Adjustment Foetor 64% 98% 98% It"" 95% Ad justed Peak Parlcong 47 114 114 61 6:00AM 1% 0% 10% 0% 7:00AM 5% 0% 25% u~ 20% 8:00AM 10% 0% 45% 0" 60% 9:00AM 30% 0% 70% ~ 80% !O:OOAM 50% 0% 90% (n( 90% 11 :00 AM 65% 15% 90% 0 100% 12.00 NOON 80% 50% 100% 90% 1:00 PM 90% 55% 85% " 80% 2:00PM 100% 45% 65% 14 60% 3:00PM 100% 45% 40% 21" 40% 4:00PM 95% 45% 45% :~ 20% 5:00PM 90% 60% 60% <l 10% 6:00PM 80% 90% 70% .8 5% 7:00PM 75% 95% 70% 5 0% 8:00PM 65% 100% 65% Sh 0% 9:00PM 50% 90% 30% 70% 0% 10:00 PM 35% 90% 25% 100% 0% 11:00 PM 15% 90% 15% qg 0% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 10% 81 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commercial Reta il Fine/Usual Oinina Fam ily Restaurant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM 0 0 11 0 0 11 7:00 AM 2 0 29 0 0 31 8:00AM 5 0 51 0 0 56 9:00AM 14 0 80 0 0 94 !O:OOAM 24 0 103 0 0 127 ll:OOAM 31 17 103 0 0 151 12:00 NOON 38 57 114 0 0 209 1:00 PM 42 63 97 0 0 202 2:00PM 47 51 74 8 0 180 3:00PM 47 51 46 13 0 157 4 :00PM 45 51 51 13 0 160 5:00PM 42 68 68 13 0 191 6:00 PM 38 103 80 11 0 232 7:00PM 35 108 80 21 0 244 8:00PM 31 114 74 32 0 251 9:00 PM 24 103 34 43 0 204 10:00 PM 16 103 29 61 0 209 11:00 PM 7 103 17 60 0 187 12:00 MID 0 57 11 49 0 117 Muimum 251 Project Name: The CAmellia Square Shopping Center Job Number: 6356 Month of the Year; July Day o f t he Week: Weekend Parkin g Rates Used: City of Temple City/Urban land lnstttute Employee/Resident Parking Dlstributton Time of the Dav Commercia l Retail Fine/Casual Dinina Familv Restaurant Karao~o.e Offke Tot•! P .. k Parklno 18 21 21 0 9 69 Montll!y_Ad"ustment hctor 80% 100% 100% 95% Adjust ed Peak Par1ung 14 21 21 9 6:00AM 10% 0% SO% 0% 7 :00AM 15% 20% 75% "" 20% 8:00AM 40% 30% 90% ~ 60% 9:00 AM 75% 60% 90% 0'11 80% !O:OOAM 85% 75% 100% en! 90% ll:OOAM 95% 75% 100% u 100% 12:00NOON 100% 75% 100% Oi 90% 1:00PM 100% 75% 100% 80% 2:00PM 100% 75% 100% ,. 60% 31!0 PM 100% 75% 75% 21" 40% 4·00 PM 100% 75% 75% no; 20% 5:00PM 95% 100% 95% 21li 10% 6:00PM 85% 100% 95% 18" 5% 7:00PM 80% 100% 95% 35" 0% 8:00PM 75% 100% 95% 52" 0% 9:00PM 65% 100% 80% 70% 0% 10:00 PM 45% 100% 65% 100% 0% 11:00 PM 15% 85% 65% 90< 0% 12:00 MID 0% SO% 35% 81 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Soaces Time of the Day Commercial Retail Fine/Cisual Olninfi! Family Restaurant Karaoke Offtce Total 6:00AM 1 0 11 0 0 12 7:00AM 2 4 16 0 2 24 8:00AM 6 6 19 0 s 36 900AM 11 13 19 0 7 so !O:OOAM 12 16 21 0 8 57 11:00 AM 13 16 21 0 9 59 ll:OO NOON 14 16 21 0 8 59 1:00PM 14 16 21 0 7 58 2:00 PM 14 16 21 0 s 56 300 PM 14 16 16 0 4 so 4:00PM 14 16 16 0 2 48 5:00PM 13 21 20 0 1 55 600 PM 12 21 20 0 0 53 7:00PM 11 2 1 20 0 0 52 8:00PM 11 21 20 0 0 52 91!0 PM 9 21 17 0 0 4 7 !O:OOPM 6 21 14 0 0 41 11 OOPM 2 18 14 0 0 34 1 2:00MID 0 11 7 0 0 18 Maximum 59 Project Name: The Umellia Square Shopplne Center Job N umber: 6356 Month of the Year: Aucust Day of the Week: Weekend Parking Rates Used: City of Temple City/U rban land InstitUte Customer/Visitor/Guest Parking Distnbut10n Time of the Dav Commercial Retail F1ne/Usual D inina Fam1lv Restaurant ICar:.e~< Offk:e Total Peak Parkina 74 116 116 61 0 367 Monthty Ad ustment Factor 69% 99% 99% CJI" 95% Adjusted Peak Parkmg 51 115 115 61 6 :00 AM 1% 0% 10% " 0% 7:00AM 5% 0% 25% 0~ 20% 8:00AM 10% 0% 45% O'll 60% 9:00AM 30% 0% 70% O'll 80% !O:OOAM 50% 0% 90% O'll 90% U :OOAM 65% I S% 90% 0 100% 12:00 NOON 80% SO% 100% a. 90% 1:00PM 90% SS% 85% " SO% 2-QO PM 100% 45% 65% .~ 60% 3.00 PM 100% 45% 40% 21" 40% 4:00PM 95% 45% 45% 2~ 20% 5:00PM 90% 60% 60% .: 10% 6:00PM 80% 90% 70% . 5% 7:00 PM 75% 95% 70% 3~ 0% 8 :00 PM 65% 100% 65% 5""' 0% 9:00PM 50% 90% 30% 70¥. 0% 10:0 0 PM 35% 90% 25% 100% 0% 11:00 PM 15% 90% 15% 99 0% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 10% 3 0% P•rkln Demand: Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commercial Retail Fine/Usual Dining Family Restaurant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM I 0 12 0 0 13 7:00AM 3 0 29 0 0 32 8:00AM 5 0 52 0 0 57 9:00AM 15 0 81 0 0 96 !O:OOAM 26 0 104 0 0 130 U :OOAM 33 17 104 0 0 154 12:00 NOON 41 58 us 0 0 214 1:00 PM 46 63 98 0 0 207 2:00 PM 5 1 52 75 8 0 186 3:00 PM 51 52 46 13 0 162 4 :00 PM 48 52 52 13 0 165 5:00PM 46 69 69 13 0 197 6:00PM 41 104 81 u 0 237 7:00PM 38 109 81 21 0 249 8:00PM 33 us 75 32 0 255 9:00PM 26 104 35 43 0 208 10:00 PM 18 104 29 61 0 212 U :OO PM 8 104 17 60 0 189 12:00 MID 0 58 12 49 0 U9 Maximu m 255 Project N~me The Umell~ Squ~re Shoppinc Center Job Number · 6356 Month of the Yur Aucust Dav of the Week Weekend P~rkln1 R~tes Used: Oty of Temple City/Urban land Institute Employee/Resident Parkina D1stnbut10n Time of the O~v Commercial Ret~1l Fine/Casual Dlnln1 Fam llv Restaurant l(ar.ao~,. OffiCe Total Peak Park ln a 18 21 21 0 9 69 Monthly Adjustment Factor 80% 100% 100% 95" Adjusted Puk Parkon& 14 21 21 9 600AM 10% 0% 50% 0% 700AM 15" 20% 75" .,. 20% SOOAM 40% 30% 90% 0% 60% 9:00AM 75" 60% 90% 01f, 80% !O:OOAM 85" 75" 100% 0% 90% 1100 AM 95" 75" 100% ~ 100% 12 ·00 NOO N 100% 75" 100% (W. 90% 1 :00PM 100% 75" 100% 0% SO% 200PM 100% 75" 100% 14~ 60% 3.00 PM 100% 75" 75" 21" 40% 4 00PM 100% 75" 75" 22': 20% 5:00PM 95" 100% 95" ;}'!} 10% 600PM 85% 100% 95" !8,. 5" 700 PM 80% 100% 95" l~t. 0% 8:00 PM 75" 100% 95" 5.!'1\ 0% 9:00PM 65" 100% 80% 71)% 0% 10·00 PM 45" 100% 65" 100% 0" lLOO PM IS" 85" 65" 0% 1200MID 0% 50% 35" 'I 0% Parkin Demand Number of Soaces Time of the Day Commercial Reta1l Fone/Casual Dlnln1 hm1lv Restaunnt Karaoke Office Total 600AM I 0 11 0 0 12 700AM 2 4 16 0 2 24 SOOAM 6 6 19 0 5 36 9"00AM 11 13 19 0 7 50 !O:OOAM 12 16 21 0 8 57 IIOOAM 13 16 21 0 9 59 12:00NOO N 14 16 21 0 8 59 LOOPM 14 16 21 0 7 58 2:00PM 14 16 21 0 5 56 3:00PM 14 16 16 0 4 50 4·00 PM 14 16 16 0 2 48 5:00PM 13 2 1 20 0 1 55 6:00PM 12 21 20 0 0 53 7:00PM II 21 20 0 0 52 8:00PM 11 21 20 0 0 52 9"00 PM 9 21 17 0 0 47 IOOOPM 6 21 14 0 0 41 1l:OOPM 2 18 14 0 0 34 1200MID 0 II 7 0 0 IS Mulmum 59 Project Name: The Umellia Square Shopping Center Job Number: 6356 Mont h of the Year: September Day of the Week: Weekend Parking Rates Used : City of Temple City/Urban land Inst itute Customer/Visitor/Guest Parking Distnbutton Time of the Day Commercial Retail Fine/Casual Dining Family Restauran t Karaoke Office Total Peak Parking 74 116 116 61 0 367 Monthly Ad ·ustment Factor 64% 91% 91% 100' 100% Adjusted Peak Parking 47 106 106 61 6:00AM 1% 0% 10% 0 0% 7:00AM S% 0% 25% o·~ 20% 8:00AM 10% 0% 45% 0% 60% 9:00AM 30% 0% 70% 0% 80% !O:OOA M SO% 0% 90% Ol; 90% 11:00 AM 65% 15% 90% 0 100% 12:00 NOON 80% 50% 100% 0 90% 1:00 PM 90% SS% 85% 0 80% 2:00PM 100% 45% 65% 14'~ 60% 3:00PM 100% 45% 40% 21 % 40% 4:00PM 95% 45% 45% 21% 20% 5:00PM 90% 60% 60% 21 10% 6 :00PM 80% 90% 70% 18' 5% 7:00PM 75% 95% 70% 35 0% 8:00PM 65% 100% 65% 52"'. 0% 9:00PM 50% 90% 30% l()o/, 0% 10:00 PM 35% 90% 25% !OO'Ko 0% 11 :00 PM 15% 90% IS% 99 0% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 10% 81 0% Parkin Demand : Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commercial Retail Fine/casual Dining Fa mil Restaurant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM 0 0 11 0 0 11 7:00AM 2 0 27 0 0 29 8:00AM 5 0 48 0 0 53 9:00AM 14 0 74 0 0 88 !O:OOAM 24 0 95 0 0 119 11:00AM 31 16 95 0 0 142 12:00 NOON 38 53 106 0 0 197 1:00PM 42 58 90 0 0 190 2:00PM 47 48 69 8 0 172 3:00PM 47 48 42 13 0 150 4:00 PM 45 48 48 13 0 154 5:00PM 42 64 64 13 0 183 6:00PM 38 95 74 11 0 218 7:00PM 35 101 74 21 0 231 8:00PM 31 106 69 32 0 238 9:00PM 24 95 32 43 0 194 10:00 PM 16 95 27 61 0 199 11:00 PM 7 95 16 60 0 178 12:00 MID 0 53 11 49 0 113 Maxim um 238 Project Name: The Camellia Square Shopping Center Job Number: 6 356 Month of the Year: September Day of the Week: Weekend Parking Rates Used: City of Temple City/Urba n land Institute Emp loyee/Resident Parking Distribution Time of the Dav Commerci al Retail Fine/Casual Dinin• Family Restaurant Karao~e Office Total Pe ak ParkinR 18 21 21 0 9 69 Mont hlv Ad ·ustment Factor 80% 100% 100% 100 100% Adjusted Peak Parking 14 21 21 9 6:00AM 10% 0% SO% 0 0 % 7:00 AM IS% 20% 75% o·~ 20% 8:00 AM 40% 30% 90% Oll 60% 9:00AM 75% 60% 90% 0~ 80% !O:OOAM 85% 75% 100% 0'!! 90% 11:0 0AM 95% 75% 100% IY 100% 12:00 NOON 100% 75% 100% 0' 90% 1:00 PM 100% 75% 100% IY 80% 2:00PM 100% 75% 100% 14'~ 60% 3:00PM 100% 75% 75% 21% 40% 4 :00PM 100% 75% 75% ~211 20% 5:00 PM 95% 100% 95% 21 10% 6:00 PM 85% 100% 95% 18'. 5% 7:00PM 80% 100% 95% 35' 0% 8:00PM 75% 100% 95% Si~ 0% 9:00 PM 65% 100% 80% 70% 0% 10:00 PM 45% 100% 65% 10~ 0% 11 :00 PM 15% 85% 65% 99 0% 12 :00 MID 0% 5 0% 35% 81 0% Parkin t Demand: N umber or Spaces Time or th e Day Commercial Retail Fine/Casual Dining Family Restaurant Karaoke Offi ce Tot al 6:00AM I 0 11 0 0 12 7:00AM 2 4 16 0 2 24 8 :00AM 6 6 19 0 5 36 9:00AM 11 13 19 0 7 so !O:OOAM 12 16 21 0 8 57 11 :00AM 13 16 21 0 9 59 1 2:00 NOON 14 16 21 0 8 59 1:00PM 14 16 2 1 0 7 58 2 :00 PM 14 16 21 0 5 56 3:00PM 14 16 16 0 4 so 4 :00 PM 14 16 16 0 2 48 5:00PM 13 21 20 0 I 55 6:00PM 12 2 1 20 0 0 53 7:00PM 11 21 20 0 0 52 8:00PM 11 21 20 0 0 52 9:00PM 9 21 17 0 0 4 7 !O:OOPM 6 2 1 14 0 0 41 11:00PM 2 18 14 0 0 34 12:00MID 0 11 7 0 0 18 Maximum 59 Project Name: The camellia Square Shopping Center Jo b Number: 6356 Month of the Year: October Day of the Week: Weekend Parking Rates Used: City of Temple City/Urban land Institute Cu stomer/Vis itor/Guest Parking Distribut ion Time of t he Day Commercial Retail Fine/Casual Dining Family Re staurant Karaol-:e O ffice Total Peak Parking 74 116 116 61 0 367 M onthly Ad'ust ment Factor 66% 96% 96% 100' 100% Adjusted Peak Parking 4 9 111 Ill 6 1 6:00AM 1% 0 % 10% u 0% 7:00AM 5% 0% 25% 0'· 20% 8:00AM 10% 0 % 45% 0% 60% 9:00AM 30% 0% 70% 0% 80% !O:OOAM SO% 0 % 90% 0% 90% 11:00 AM 65% 15% 90% 0 100% 12:00 NOON 80% SO% 100% o; 90% 1:00 PM 90% 55% 85% 0 80% 2:00PM 100% 45% 65% 14 ,~ 60% 3:00PM 100% 45% 40% 21 ~ 40% 4 :00PM 95% 45% 45% l2o/, 20% 5:00 PM 90% 60% 60% 21 10% 6 :00PM 80% 90% 70% 18, 5% 7:00PM 75% 95% 70% 35 0% 8 :00 PM 65% 100% 65% 5.: 0% 9:00PM SO% 90% 30% 70" 0% 10:00 PM 35% 90% 25% IOOo/. 0% 11:00 PM 15% 90% 15% 99e 0% 12:00 MID 0% SO% 10% 81' 0% Pa rk in Demand: Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commercial Re tail Fine/casual D ining Family Restaurant Karaoke O ffic e Tot• I 6:00AM 0 0 11 0 0 11 7 :00AM 2 0 28 0 0 30 8:00AM 5 0 so 0 0 55 9:00 AM 15 0 78 0 0 93 !O:OOAM 25 0 100 0 0 125 !1:00AM 32 17 100 0 0 149 12:00 NOON 39 56 111 0 0 206 1:00 PM 44 6 1 94 0 0 199 2:00 PM 4 9 so 72 8 0 179 3:00PM 4 9 so 44 13 0 156 4 :00 PM 4 7 so so 13 0 160 5 :0 0 PM 44 67 67 13 0 191 6 :00PM 39 100 78 11 0 228 7:00 PM 37 l OS 78 21 0 241 8:00 PM 32 111 72 32 0 247 9:00PM 25 100 33 43 0 201 10:00 PM 17 100 28 61 0 206 11:00 PM 7 100 17 60 0 184 12:00 MI D 0 56 11 49 0 116 Ma)(imum 247 Project Name: The camellia Square Shopping Center Jo b Number: 6356 Mont h of the Year: October Day of th e Week: Weekend Parking Rates Used: City of Temple City/Urban Land Institut e Emp loyee/Resident Parking Distribution Time of the Day Commercial Reta il Fine/Casual Dining Family Restaurant Karaoke Office Total Pe ak Parking 18 2 1 21 0 9 69 Monthly Ad 'ustment Factor 80% 100% 100% 100', 100% Adjusted Peak Parking 14 21 21 9 6:00AM 10% 0% 50% 0 0% 7 :00AM 15% 20% 75% 0', 20% 8 :00AM 40% 30% 90% O'll 60% 9 :00AM 75% 60% 90% O'll 80% !O:OO AM 85% 75 % 100% O'll 90% 11:00 AM 95% 75% 100% 0 100% 1 2:00NOON 100% 75% 100% 0 90% 1:00 PM 100% 75% 100% 0 80% 2:00PM 100% 75% 100% 14 60% 3:00 PM 100% 75% 75% 21'1 40% 4 :00PM 100% 75% 75% 22~ 20% 5:00PM 95% 100% 95% 2 1 ~ 10% 6:00PM 85% 100% 95% 18 5% 7:00PM 80% 100% 95% 35 0% 8:00PM 75% 100% 95% 52', 0% 9:00PM 65% 100% 80% 70" 0% 10:0 0 PM 45% 100% 65% 100% 0% 11:00 PM 15% 85% 65% 99 0% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 35% 81 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Spaces Time of t he Day Commercial Retail Fine/Casual Dining Family Rest aurant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM I 0 11 0 0 12 7:00AM 2 4 16 0 2 24 8:00AM 6 6 19 0 5 36 9:00 AM 11 13 19 0 7 so !O:OOAM 12 16 21 0 8 57 11:00 AM 13 16 2 1 0 9 59 12:00 NO ON 14 16 21 0 8 59 1:00PM 14 16 21 0 7 58 2:00PM 14 16 21 0 5 56 3:00PM 14 16 16 0 4 so 4 :00 PM 14 16 16 0 2 48 5:00 PM 13 21 20 0 1 55 6:00 PM 1 2 21 20 0 0 53 7 :00 PM 11 21 20 0 0 52 8:00PM 11 21 20 0 0 52 9:00 PM 9 21 17 0 0 47 10:00 PM 6 21 14 0 0 41 11 :00 PM 2 18 14 0 0 34 12:00 MID 0 11 7 0 0 18 Maximum 59 ProJeCt Name The Camell.a Squ~re Shoppinc Center Job Nu mber· 6356 Month o f the Year November Day of t he Week: Weekend Parklna Rates Used U ty of Temple City/Urban Land Ins titute Cus tomer/VIsrtor/Guest Plrkins D1stnbuuon Tlmo of t ho Day Commercial Ret11l F1no/C.sual Dlnln1 hm1l Restaurant K ara o~l!' Offke Total Pnk Parklna 74 116 116 6 1 0 367 Monthlv Adlustment Factor 72% 93% 93% 100% Adlusted Puk Parl<~na 53 108 108 6 1 600AM 1% 0% 10% 0% 700AM 5% 0% 25% W>o 20% BOO AM 10% 0% 45% 0% 60% 9.00AM 30% 0% 70% Cl"· 80% IOOOAM 50% 0% 90% 0% 90% 11 :00 AM 65% I S% 90% 100% 12·00 NOON 80% SO% 100% 90% I OOPM 90% SS% 85% 80% 200PM 100% 45% 65% .. 60% 3:00PM 100% 45% 40% 21': 40% 400PM 95% 45% 45% 22': 20% SOOPM 90% 60% 60% 2 10% 6·00 PM 80% 90% 70% S% 7 .00 PM 75% 95% 70% s 0% 8 :00 PM 65% 100% 65% ,, 0% 9.00 PM SO% 90% 30% 10'1: 0% 10:00 PM 35% 90% 25% l OCI; 0% 1100 PM 15% 90% 15% 0% 12 00 MID 0% SO% 10% 0% Parkin Demand. Number of Spaces Time o f the Day Commercial Ret11l f,.ne/Casu•l Oinlng F1m1ly Resuurant Karaoke OffiCe Total 600AM I 0 11 0 0 12 7:00AM 3 0 27 0 0 30 800AM 5 0 49 0 0 S4 900AM 16 0 76 0 0 92 IOOOAM 27 0 97 0 0 124 1100AM 34 16 97 0 0 14 7 12 00 NOO N 4 2 54 108 0 0 204 LOOPM 48 59 92 0 0 199 2:00PM 53 49 70 8 0 180 3:00PM 53 49 43 13 0 ISS 4 .00PM so 49 49 13 0 161 500PM 4 8 65 65 13 0 191 6:00PM 4 2 97 76 11 0 226 7 .00 PM 40 103 76 21 0 240 800PM 34 108 70 32 0 244 900PM 27 97 32 4 3 0 199 10:00 PM 19 97 27 61 0 204 11·00 PM 8 97 16 60 0 181 1200 MID 0 54 11 4 9 0 114 Maximum 244 Project Name: The camellia Square Shopping Center Job Number: 6356 Month of the Yea r : November Day o f the Week: Weekend Parking Rates Used: City of Temple City/Urba n land Institute Time of the Day Commercial Reta il Fine/Casual Dining Peak Parking 18 21 Monthly Ad 'ustment Fact or 90% 100% Adjust ed Peak ParkJng 16 21 6:00AM 10% 0% 7 :00AM 15% 20% 8:00AM 40% 30% 9:00AM 75 % 60% !O:OOAM 85% 7 5% 11:00AM 95% 75% 1 2:00 NOON 100% 75% 1 :00 PM 100% 75% 2:00PM 100% 7 5% 3:00PM 100% 75% 4:00PM 100% 75% 5:00PM 95% 100% 6:00PM 85% 100% 7:00PM 80% 100% 8:00 PM 75% 100% 9:00PM 65% 100% 10:00 PM 45% 100% 11:00 PM 15% 85% 12:00 MID 0% 50% Pa rkin Time of the Day Comme rcia l Re t ail Fine/Casual Dining 6:00 AM 2 0 7:00AM 2 4 8:00AM 6 6 9:00AM 12 13 !O:OOAM 14 16 11:00 AM 15 16 12:00 NOON 16 16 1:00PM 16 16 2:00PM 16 16 3:00PM 16 16 4:00 PM 16 16 5:00PM 15 21 6:00 PM 14 21 7:00 PM 13 2 1 8:00PM 12 2 1 9:00PM 10 21 10:00 PM 7 21 11:00 PM 2 18 12:00 MID 0 11 Maximum Employee/Resident Parking Distribu tion Family Restaurant l<a raoke Office Total 21 0 9 69 100% 100' 100% 21 9 50% 0 0% 75% 01. 20% 90% 0% 60% 90% 0% 80% 100% 0% 90% 100% 0 100% 100% 0 90% 100% 0' 80% 100% 14 60% 75% 21,.; 40% 75% Z2'>: 20% 95% ll 10% 95% 18 5% 95% 35 0% 95% 52 0% 80% 70'1! 0% 65% 100% 0% 65% 99 0% 35% 81 0% Demand: Number of Spaces Family Restaurant Karaoke Office To tal 11 0 0 13 16 0 2 24 19 0 5 36 19 0 7 51 21 0 8 59 21 0 9 61 21 0 8 61 21 0 7 60 21 0 5 58 16 0 4 5 2 16 0 2 so 20 0 1 57 20 0 0 55 20 0 0 54 20 0 0 53 17 0 0 48 14 0 0 42 14 0 0 34 7 0 0 18 61 _ _j Project Name: The Camellia Square Shopping Center Jo b N um ber : 6356 Month of t he Year : December Da y of t he Week: Weekend Parking Rates Used: C1tyofTemple City/Urban l a nd l nst •tute Customer/Visitor/Guest Parking Dist ribution T ime of the Day Commercial Retail Fine/Casual Dining Family Restaurant Karaoke Office Total Peak Parking 74 116 116 61 0 367 Mont h! Ad 'ustment Factor 100% 100% 100% !Oil' 100% Adjus te d Peak Parking 74 116 116 61 6:00AM 1 0% 10% 0' 0% 7:00AM s~. 0% 25% O'l. 20% 8:00 AM 10% 0% 45% O'E 60% 9:00 AM 35% 0% 70% 0" 80% !O:O OAM 60% 0% 90% 011 90% 11:00 AM '0' 15% 90% o• 100% 12:00 NOON 85 SO% 100% o• 90% 1:00PM 95' 55% 85% a. 80% 2:00PM 100'l. 45% 65% 14'• 60% 3:00PM 100% 45% 40% 21" 40% 4:00PM 95% 45% 45% 2-'" 20% 5:00PM 90. 60% 60% 21 10% 6:00PM 80 90% 70% 18' 5% 7:00PM 75 95% 70% 35, 0% 8:00PM 65,. 100% 65% 5L 0% 9:00PM SOo/· 90% 30% 70'l! 0% 10:00 PM 35% 90% 25% lOO'lE 0% 11:00 PM 15% 90% 15% 99" 0% 12:00 MID 01> SO% 10% 81 0% Pa rkin Dema nd : Number of Spaces Time of the Day Commercia l Ret ail Fino/Casual DlninR Family Restaurant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM l 0 12 0 0 13 7:00AM 4 0 29 0 0 33 8:00 AM 7 0 52 0 0 59 9:00AM 26 0 8 1 0 0 107 !O:OOAM 44 0 104 0 0 148 11:00AM 52 17 104 0 0 173 l 2:00NOON 63 58 116 0 0 237 1:00PM 70 64 99 0 0 233 2:0 0PM 74 52 75 8 0 209 3:00PM 74 5 2 46 l3 0 185 4:00PM 70 52 52 l3 0 187 5:00PM 67 70 70 13 0 220 6:00PM 59 104 81 11 0 255 7:00PM 56 11 0 81 21 0 268 8:00PM 48 11 6 75 32 0 271 9:00PM 37 104 35 43 0 219 10:00 PM 26 104 29 61 0 220 11:00 PM 11 104 17 60 0 192 12:00 MID 0 58 12 49 0 119 Maximum 27 1 Project Nam e: The Ca mellia Square Shopping Cent er Job Nu mber: 6356 Month of the Year : De ce mber Day o f the Wee k: Weekend Parking Rates Use d: City of Te mple Ci ty/Urban La nd I nstitut e Emp loyee/Re sident Parki ng Oist nbution Time o f the Day Commercial Reta1l Fine/Casual Dining Family Restaurant Pe ak Parkin g 18 21 21 M o nt hly Adjust ment Factor 100% 100% 100% Adjust ed Peak Pa rking 18 2 1 21 6 :00AM 10% 0% SO% 7 :00AM 15% 20% 75% 8:00AM 40% 30% 90% 9 :00AM 75% 60% 90% !O:OOAM 85% 75% 100% !1:00AM 95% 75% 100% 12:00 NOO N 100% 75% 100% 1 :00 PM 100% 75% 100% 2 :00 PM 100% 7 5% 100% 3 :00PM 100% 75% 75% 4 :00PM 100% 7 5% 75% S :OO PM 95% 100% 95% 6:00PM 8 5% 10 0% 95% 7 :00PM 80% 100% 95% 8 :00 PM 75% 10 0% 95% 9 :00PM 65% 100% 80% 10 :00 PM 4 5% 100% 65% 11:00 PM 15% 85% 65% 1 2:00 MI D 0% SO% 35% Parkins Demand : Number of Spaces Ti me of t he Day Co mmerc ial Re tail Fine/Casual Dining Fa mily Res tauran t 6:00 AM 2 0 11 7 :00AM 3 4 16 8:00AM 7 6 19 9 :00AM 14 13 19 !O:OOAM 15 16 21 ll:OOAM 17 16 2 1 12:00 NOON 18 16 2 1 1 :00 PM 18 16 2 1 2:00 PM 18 16 21 3 :00 PM 18 16 16 4:00 PM 18 16 16 S :OO PM 17 21 20 6 :00 PM IS 21 20 7:00 PM 14 21 20 8 :00PM 14 21 20 9:00PM 1 2 21 17 10:00 PM 8 21 14 11:00 PM 3 18 14 1 2:00 MID 0 11 7 M a ximum Karao~e Office Total 0 9 69 100'. 100% 9 ~ 0% 0' 20% 0% 60% 0% 80% 0% 90% 0 100% 0' 90% 0 80% 14 60% 21% 4 0% 2211-20% 2 1 10% !S•• S% 35 0% 520,. 0% 70"1-0% 100% 0% 99 0% 81 0% Kara oke Office Total 0 0 13 0 2 25 0 s 37 0 7 53 0 8 60 0 9 63 0 8 63 0 7 62 0 5 60 0 4 54 0 2 52 0 1 59 0 0 56 0 0 ss 0 0 ss 0 0 50 0 0 43 0 0 35 0 0 18 63 ---------------------------------------------------------- Project Name: The Camellia Square Shopping Center Job Number: 6 356 Mont h of t he Year: Lat e De cember Day of the Week: Weekend Pa rking Rates Used : City of Temple City/U rban l and Institute Customer/VIsitor/Guest Parking Distribution Time of the Oav Commercial Retail Fine/Casual Dining Family Restaurant Karaoke O ffice Total Peak Parkin_g_ 74 116 116 61 0 367 Monthly Ad ·ust ment Factor 80% 95% 95% lOCo/ 80% Adjusted Peak Parking 59 110 110 61 6:00AM 1 0% 10% o· 0% 7:00AM S;_ 0% 25% 0 20% 8:00AM 10': 0% 45% Cloi 60% 9:00AM 20" 0% 70% Oloi 80% !O:OOAM 40'1; 0% 90% 0~ 90% 11:00 AM 60 15% 90% 0' 100% 12:00 NOON 80~ 50% 100% o; 90% 1:00 PM 95 55% 85% 0 80% 2:00PM 100' 45% 65% 14 60% 3:00PM 100'1; 45% 40% 21" 40% 4 :00PM 95'1; 45% 45% 2 2'! 20% 5:00PM 85• 60% 60% 21 10% 6:00PM 70 90% 70% 18·, 5% 7:00PM 60' 95% 70% 35 0% 8 :00PM 50<;. 100% 65% s~ 0% 9:00PM 30o/. 90% 30% 70'1; 0% 10:00 PM 2011 90% 25% 100% 0% 11 :00 PM 10, 90% 15% 99 0% 12:00 MID o~ SO% 10% 81 0% Parkin Demand: Number o f Spaces Time of the Day Commercial Re t ail Fine/Casual Dining Family Restaurant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM 1 0 11 0 0 12 7:00AM 3 0 28 0 0 31 8:00AM 6 0 so 0 0 56 9:00AM 12 0 77 0 0 89 !O:OOAM 24 0 99 0 0 123 11:00 AM 35 17 99 0 0 151 12:00 NOON 47 55 110 0 0 212 1:00 PM 56 61 94 0 0 2 11 2:00PM 59 50 72 8 0 189 3:00PM 59 50 44 13 0 166 4 :00 PM 56 so so 13 0 169 5:00PM 50 66 66 13 0 195 6:00PM 41 99 77 11 0 228 7:00PM 35 105 77 21 0 238 8:00PM 30 110 72 32 0 244 9:00PM 18 99 33 43 0 193 10:00 PM 1 2 99 28 61 0 200 11:00 PM 6 99 17 60 0 182 12:00 MI D 0 55 11 49 0 115 Maximum 244 Project Name: The Camellia Sq uare Shopping Center Job Number: 6356 Month of t he Year: late December Day o f t he Week: Weekend Parking Rates Used: City of Temple City/Urban l and Institute Emp loyee/Resident Pa rklnr. Distribution Time of the Dav Commercia l Reta fl Fine/Casual Oinin2 Familv Restaurant Karao ke Office Total Peak Parking 18 21 21 0 9 69 Monthly Ad ·ustment Factor 90% 100% 100% 100'-80% Adjusted Peak Parking 16 21 21 7 6:00AM 10% 0% SO% 0 0% 7 :00AM 15% 20% 75% O'>o 20% 8:00 AM 40% 30% 90% O'Y. 60% 9:00AM 75% 60% 90% Oo/. 80% !O:OOAM 85% 75% 100% Oo/. 90% ll:OOAM 95% 75% 100% 100% 12:00 NOON 100% 75% 100% 0'-90% 1:00 PM 100% 75% 100% v 80% 2:00 PM 100% 75% 100% 14 .. 60% 3:00PM 100% 75% 75% 21!11 40% 4 :00PM 100% 75% 75% 22V. 20% 5 :00PM 95% 100% 95% 21'~ 10% 6:00 PM 85% 100% 95% 18' 5% 7 :00PM 80% 100% 95% 35 0% 8:00 PM 75% 100% 95% 52' .. 0% 9:00 PM 65% 100% 80% 70o/. 0% 10:00 PM 45% 100% 65% 100% 0% 11:00 PM 15% 85% 65% 99 0% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 35% 81" 0% Parkin Demand: Number of Soaces Time of the Day Commercia l Retail Fine/Casua l Dininl!: Family Restaurant Karaoke Office Total 6:00AM 2 0 11 0 0 13 7:00AM 2 4 16 0 1 23 8:00AM 6 6 19 0 4 35 9:00AM 12 13 19 0 6 so !O:OO AM 14 16 21 0 6 57 11:00AM 15 16 21 0 7 59 12:00 NOON 16 16 21 0 6 59 1:00PM 16 16 21 0 6 59 2:00PM 16 16 21 0 4 57 3:00PM 16 16 16 0 3 51 4 :00PM 16 16 16 0 1 49 5:00PM 15 21 20 0 1 57 6:00PM 14 21 20 0 0 55 7:00PM 13 21 20 0 0 54 8:00PM 12 21 20 0 0 53 9:00PM 10 21 17 0 0 48 10:00 PM 7 21 14 0 0 42 11:00 PM 2 18 14 0 0 34 12:00 MID 0 11 7 0 0 18 Maximum 59 1111 Town & Country Road, Suite 34 Orange, California 92868 (714) 973-8383 ATTACHMENT 5 m PHOTOGRAPHS OF SITE ~~~ FRONT ELEVATION OF 9055 LAS TUNAS DRIVE, BUILDING 1 FRONT ENTRANCE OF 9055 LAS TUNAS DRIVE, UNIT 125 REAR ENTRANCE OF UNIT AND PROPOSED DOOR FOR NEW SERVICE CORRIDOR WEST ALONG REAR DRIVEWAY NORTH AlONG REAR DRIVEWAY, HOUSE ON OTHER SIDE OF THE WAll EAST AlONG REAR DRIVEWAY, FORMER lOADING DOCK lOCATION FOR BUilDING 1 ATTACHMENT 6 m AERIAL PHOTO AND LAND USE MAP Ill 9055 Las Tunas Drive, Unit 125 9055 Las Tunas Drive, Unit 125 N ATTACHMENT 01 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING Tu es day, Sep t ember 27, 2016, 7:30 P .M. City Co un ci l Chambe r s, 5938 Kauffman Avenue, Temple City www.templecity.us OPENING MATTERS : • Call to Order - • Roll Call: PRESENT: Comm i ssioner-Cordes, Leung, O'Leary, Marston, Haddad ABSENT: Commissioner-None ALSO PRESENT: Community Developmen t Director Forbes, Planning Manager Reimers, City Attorney Murphy, Associate Planner Gulick, Planning Intern Gillespie, and Pla nning Secretary Venters • Pledge of Allegiance ORAL COMMUNICATIONS/ PUBLIC COMMENT: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES : 1. Planning Commission Meeting of September 13, 2016 Vice-Chair Marston made a motion to approve the Planning Commission minutes dated September 13, 2016. Seconded by Commis sioner O'Leary and was approved unanimously by the following votes: AYES: ABSTAIN: NOES: ABSENT: PAGEl OFS Commissioner -Cordes, Leung, O'Leary, Marston, Haddad Commissioner -None Commissioner-None Commissioner -None PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 2. File: PL 16-315 . A tentative tract map and a major site plan review to allow the construction of eight co ndominium units in the R-2 zone. Plann ing Intern Gillespie gave a brief summary of the staff report. Chairman Haddad opened the public hearing. Kamen Lai. applicant stated that the project meets the zoning standards and that he wi ll abide by the cond itions of approval. Tian-He Han. resident, expressed concern regarding noise caused during the course of construction. Keiko Lam. reside nt, spoke about another multi-family development. Christi n e N guyen. resident spoke in favor of t he tentative tract map. Cha irman Haddad closed the public hearing . Commi ssioner Cordes made a motion to approve PL 16-315, adopt the resolution, and f ind that th e project is categorica lly exempt. Seconded by Vice -Chair M arston and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: ABSTAIN: NOES: ABSENT: Commissioner -Cordes, Leung, O'Leary, Marston, Hadda d Commissioner -None Commis sioner-None Commi ssioner -None 3. File: PL 15 -316. A conditiona l use permit to establish a 7,891 square foot karaoke television (KTV) busi ness located in the Camellia Square shopping ce nter. Associate Plan ner Gulick gave a brief summary of the staff report. Chairman Haddad opened the public hearing . C.C. Chang. applicant's representative, -stated that the site has histori ca ll y been used as an entertainment establ ishment, therefore she felt that the proposed business is compatible with the general area. Pam Steele. MI G Hog le-Ireland. applicant's representative, stated that the applicant will abide by the conditions of approval. She addressed the findings in the staff repo rt stating that the PAGE 2 OF S PLANNING CO MMIS S ION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 intent of the busin ess i s to be a whol esome entertainment facility and should not have an adverse effect upon the use, enjoyment or valuation of adjacent or neighboring properties or upon the public area . She further added that the applicant is willing to modify the reception ar ea and that customers shou ld not loiter near the rear door as it is inten d ed to be used as an emergency exit and to re m ove garbage. Chairman Haddad, stated that a p etition was signed by t he public addressing concerns regarding th e proposed business. John Wuo, resident, spoke in favor of th e business and felt that th e music would be kept within the building as the karaoke rooms are insulated . Michael Lee. res ident is opposed to the request due to the reputation of KTV businesses. He also ex presse d concern regarding noise, parking, and the rear door being unattended and l eft open. Victoria Chang. re sident, spoke in favor of the proposed business. Bryan Kan. resident, stated that KTV businesses typica ll y generate cr ime and illicit activity. Chairman Haddad closed the public hearing . Commissioner Leung asked if the applicant had operated another KTV business elsewhere and if so, wa s there a record of customers bringing in illicit m aterial and/or alcohol. C.C. Chang. applicants representative. stated that a KTV business in the City of Alhambra does not serve alcohol and that many KTV bu sinesses are located in ma ll s without requiring assistance by authoritative agencies. Commission er O'Leary asked Ms. Steele how the security guards wil l ensure that no contr aba nd will be brought into the building. Pam Stee le, MIG Hogle-Ireland. app li cant's represe ntative, state d that although there is no set plan in place for searching for con traband, the applicant could place a table in the reception area to sea rch purses . Commissioner Cordes made a motion t o deny PL 1 6-31 6, adopt th e resol ution, and fi n d that the project is categorically exem p t. Seconded by Vice-Chair Marston and carried by the following roll ca ll vote: AYES: ABSTAIN: NOES: ABSENT: PA GE30FS Commi ssioner-Cordes, Leung, O'Lea ry, Marston, Had dad Commissioner -None Commissioner-None Commissioner-None PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 4. File: PL 16-402. A modificati on of an approved conditiona l use permit to expand an existing afterschool education business (a 1,100 square foot art school) to occupy an adjacent 1,100 square foot commercial unit. The applicant is also requesting to operate on Saturday and Sunday. Associate Planner Gulick gave a brief summary of the staff report. Chairman Haddad opened the public hearing . Sophie Zhua ng. LA Art Academy, st at ed t hat she concurs with the conditions of approval. Keiko Lam. resident expressed co ncern regarding increased parking . Chairman Haddad clo sed the public hearing . Commissioner O'Leary made a motion to approve PL 16-402, adopt the resolution, and find that the proj ec t i s categorically exe mpt. Seconded by Commissioner Leung and carried by the followi ng ro ll ca ll vo t e: AYES: ABSTAIN : NOES : ABSENT: Commi ssioner-Cordes, Leung. O'Leary, Marston, Haddad Commissioner -None Commissioner-None Commissioner-None DISCUSSION ITEM(S): S. None FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS AND REPORTS : 6. Pl anning Manager's Re port Announced that two bu sinesses are currently operating at the Camellia Square and that Tea Station Express and Kang Ho Dong Baek Jeong (Korean BBQ) are scheduled to open soon. PAGE40 FS PLANNING COMM I SSION MINU T ES SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 7. Comments from Commissioners Commiss ioner Cordes-None Commissioner Leung -None Commissioner O'Leary-None Vice-Cha irwoman Marston -None Chairman Haddad -None ADJOURNMENT : The Planning Comm i ss ion Regula r Meeti ng was adjourned at 9:07 p.m . (b:f ~ S cretar PAGESOFS I _, Background Opposition to the proposed project at 9055 Las Tunas Drive, Unit 125 ATTACHMENT E Petitioners all reside in the neighborh ood of th e proposed project property. Each of the petitioners have received a notice from the ci ty of Temple City regarding the project and the potential impacts which may cause to the nearb y residents. Petitioners hereby exercise their rights to object to th is proposed project as it ma y cause subs tantial negative impacts to the Petitioners and other local resi dents. Oppositions I. Potential noise to th e residents The proposed project is a 7,891 s quare feet KTV business, which may easily fit a few hundred customers. Even though the business may have sufficien t so undproof wa ll s to prevent noise to the public, the increased traffic of th ese few hundred c ustomers going in and out of the business would well cause excessive noise to the surrounding ne ighbors, affecti ng P eti tioners and others in the area. Il. Traffic impact As menti oned above, the increase of these few hundred cu s tomer s would al so in crease over a hundred of vehicles to be parked in t he area. However, park in g spaces are obviously insufficient in thi s small plaza to fit the vehicles for other businesses' patrons and th is KTV busi n ess. The extra vehicles would then seek local streets for parking w here it would likely cause traffic im pact to the res id ents, causing inconveniences to the affected n eighbors. III . Peacefulness of the city Al so, thi s KTV business is likely to operate l ate at night on weekdays and weekends. Again, the increased noise and traffic of the business would certainl y disturb the peacefulness of the city. Temple C ity residen t s p ay high values t o reside in thi s city because of its reputation for being quiet, clean, and peaceful. The potential nui sance caused b y this KTV business would totally des tr oy such rep utation and p ollute the city atmo sphere. Conclusion The city ofTemple City Planning Commission must reject the approval of the propos ed project as to cause the huge disturbance to the city and residents . Signatures : • i .,'. '-'-... , / .. Long Wu . Shu Yun Wu Address: 9 164 Bidwell Ave., Temple C it y 5727 Noel Dr., Temple City 5725 Noel Dr., Templ e City Additional residents from Temple City Signatures: Omuma Samansareesak o;g2 . YeeWan Fung kdAw-- Fanny Law Wong Alan Tang Bao Ai Ou Yang Kin Oi Lam -? . ,_ . !/ • ·~ I /1 .-~ r I / '. 1 " f' :· ,/"\ ' : i "-(1 d (__ :0'{11 , I ~, .. \. Kit Ying Chan Christine C hung Address: 5832 Encinita Ave Temple City, CA 91780 5834 Enci.n.ita Ave Temple City, CA 91780 5836 Encin ita Ave Tem ple City, CA 91780 5842 Encinita Ave Temp le City, CA 91780 5724 Cloverly Ave Temple C ity, CA 91780 5758 Cloverly Ave Temp le C ity, CA 91780 60 13 Alessandro Ave Tem pl e City, CA 9 17 80 6128 N Muscatel Ave Temple City, CA 91775 September 28, 2016 City of Templ e C ity Mr. Mi chael D . For bes Communi ty Devel opment Directo r 9701 Las Tunas Dr. Temple City, CA 91780 Re: Fi le# PLI5-3 16 9055 Las Tunas Dr. Uni t #125 Rich Diamond Karaoke C lub Dear Mr. Forbes: ' ' ATTACHMENT F My name is John Wuo, former Mayor of you r neighbo ring city of Arcadia. My former city manager, Don Penman spoke with you and r elated the city's co nc ern to me. I attend ed the planning commission publ ic hearing last night, and was d isappointed with the outcome. I would l ike to s hare some of my thoughts with you, may be you and Scoot Reime rs can change yo ur image ofKTV business. The appl icant is my god-daught e r, and she is a very nice girl, I wo uld like to help with h er dream of owning a busi ness. Let 's look at the big picture for the center. Since retail s tores has not been d oing well , so most spaces at new center has been occupied by restaurant or drink establ ishments. If we don't consider different types of restaurants to off set th e peak ho urs at the center, you will have the same issue w ith th e center across R osemead Blvd., not h avi ng enough parking spaces. I vis it that center freque ntly , and I have to drive aro und many times to get a parking space if I am lucky. As a Community Development Director, you can direct your staff to mix different types of eating and drinkin g establishments all o wed at th e center. So h opefully you can divide the center establishments into 1/4 and balance the peak hours into morni n g, n oon, evening and late night. The KTV business will fall in the late night peak hou rs, and it should help balance the parking needs. The follow ing are som e of the concerns expressed by s ta ff, commissioners, and residents at the meeting. I wi ll try to c larify some of the issues and are willing to answer any questions you may have. I . Noise and Safety The KTV has 19 individual roo m s, each is well ins u lated and equipped with camera. The re ar ex it is the closest to residents, and is f or emergenc y exit purpose. lt will no t be used as an ex it door dur ing operating hou rs. 1 maging it is like a movie th eater, you wi ll not hear what is going on inside the theater . 2 . Alcohol The KTV does not have alco h ol li cense , but th e concern is that customers will bri n g the ir own. T h e KTV has agreed to provide 2 security guards during weekd ays, and 5 guards for F riday and Satur day. f think 5 guards are excessive, even a night cl ub with drinking allowed d oes not require 5 security guards. This is only a singing establish ment. T he g u ard will check each customer to make certain th ey did not bring any alcoho l. I am certain the owner is ve ry much concerns about th e safety of their customers and th e ir establ ishment. ----------------------- 3. Di sturbance The KTV is willing to make a compromise offer to the city by making this a member ship establishment, so each c ustomer is approved prior befo re entering in to the KTV es tabl ishment. It is like a private country club verses p ubl ic golf course. This way they can limit the members and not open to the public. It should have much better contro l of t he KTY area in the center. Singing is a good way of re leasing s tress, and it is good for your health . The KTV estab lishment's only desire is to provide a much needed upscale entert ainment place for Temple City residents to enj oy, relax , and release some stress from yo ur work. This KTV is d iffer ent from Paradise bar, because it is membership, no acohol, and much higher scale. This KTV is different from Melody Karaoke in Rowl and Heights, because th e re is no billiard bar next to it, and it is n ot open to the public . With a ne w business proposed in the city and there is no code for it, I understand staff w ill be much cautious in perusing th is app li cation. I am certain that we have covered all areas of concern for thi s p roject, and Temple City is a much better controlled city compared to El Monte or Rowland Heights . The owner wants to work with t he c ity to provide an upscale entertainment esta bli shment that o ther c ity m ay envy for. If it is al lowed to open, the owner would extend invit atio n to ci ty staff, come and sing a few of yo ur favored songs, and release some s tress from work . Wuo 315 Lee Ave. Arcadia, CA 91 006 626-99 1-1 888 ATTACHMENT G ~JlE©Eo~m:n OCT 5 2016 u City ofTemple City APP EAL FO RM A P P E A L 0 F A P LA N N I N G C 0 I I I ') c; : 0 f~ 0 R ( 0 •,• DIR E CTOR DECISION APPELLANT INFORMATION : J ~~ IT D E ..s:... -"'-" c 'T ;;;;;J Name: Ms )(1~9 XtNg -8~ 0-1 DtAtv_CXMD g(<oJf> Address: 9 OSS L P...S \U~AS D~ 1\1£. U j0 t1 -\! \7.5 1£.-M\'\.£ c1-r<, @I\L\fo¥GIOtA , CA. q I I (Jo Phone: ( bt--b)~ 4 b 4-55 3 8 E-mail: APPEAL TYPE : ;¢l_ Appeal of Plann ing Commission deci sion 4? I I 1'71. 0 Appeal of Commun ity Development Director decision PROJECT INFORMATION : Proj ect Type: COiJDCftOtJf\L USE. t!£1-!D Project No.: '£l \ 5-3\ 6 Proj ect Address: ~ 0 55 lPr7 IUavPIS DQl ~ UJJ r-r # I 25 !'E'M 1?t "S ctt< , CA, Cj I I e D Da t e of Decision: See 21 , 'l. 0 \ ~ R EASON FOR APPEAL : State the reason or reaso ns why you are appea l i ng t he decision. Please be specific. Attach separate pages, if necessary. Wc. A ~s APPB~LttJb -n~s PLI\j.)ill~bt Cok0l~51ot>J !)(L,$,tJI}J Fd?. ova. C, t) _ P, A£PL-t eM~ foR p... \(1\~J\o ¥-r. \Bt.t-,v,~~~~ L ¥.1\JJ E5TABLI s~Mt01, I, {12olftil LOC/}"(1 0~ 1$ Wlilil~ A C(')MMfQClAL )"BOP?-~6 C6r.rftQ, A1JO EN1t.?T11JNMtff) U$ 12 Ptf ~rtrt:.O ltJI1\-I. 4\-lt A PPl.Aeft(u..l tJf" C-. u, P1 ~.f£1/f!.t-rY 2. WG f\gt; P~Ft>~I CIJ6r \o HO\lb A-Sf'cli€-rf\-1 CUMpMJi 10 $(/*f VPTU ,) GuAr<._O_; t;:oe :G1t BJG t ~S~ \1A%l> oJ &5~~~s -\-Rc.>ws, rate to the best o f my knowl edge. Si gnature: --~~~---+--------~-- Date: \ 0 J 4 I L () I (;, FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY St aff Nam e: ~ Guvfi:/Receipt No.: 7"f/'5~fl1B I Dat e: __.:_/0-1-(....!:...~f--'h<J~lb~- c:i ~ m c ~ ~ w en 0 a: ELM AVE. LJ SITE PLAN ATTACHMENT H PROJECT SUMMARY ~JECTN...6l""S": .1 .AD::>RESS Af'N"o O.LNER TOTAL FLOOR AREA: u.s=:, OGOJFANCY 6-.::0JP: OCcJPANT LOAD : -y pe OF COf'.J5TRUGTION: CODE: PLATIN"" C LU6 W55 -AS -uNA5 DR '12~ TEI'"'~E C ITY. CA ~1180 5 3-81-0\3-031 XINC:sXIt-..6 E>;<?> "'LLC"<E ST MONROY A , CA 'e)r2)16o !&26 .-'643~38 C2 •t!.IOR<. INC. l~lltl 5 YCA"'1oc;:E AVE. ~2 e:t 5 . PASADE~A. CA ~1030 T.3 23..384.0 1~S F.323.3&4.1Z>l ~, 1)11 S ::>.FT. KARAOKE A ·3 1 18 115 • 21-' • t.32/I!Zl-2' .. :l'-4nee> ~ ";:on~ .1: 2&'3 (L0t313Y • FIXED se.o.-e • OFF'CE ~ E3AR • PREP) TYPE Y-6 (FULL I -SFQ:INKLEREOJ 1-STOR'T' 6UILDING A LL UJOR< &-<ALL eE IN COf"0 LIANCE WITH TH E 2€>13 CSC, CMC, CPC, CEC, CFC A~D C ITY AND COUNTY LAU.5 ' ORD INA.I\!~5. "' 0 ... >-z "' 3 > 0 "' 0. ~ >-z < z "' >- 8 Vl 0 0. 0 "' 0. ~ 0 C.M./D.T. N.T.5 . U 1~11 SHEET t\0. T-1.0 Or -SHttTS 46'-5" 1 r-~.'lj~~ l~~ ~ ~·-•· SERVICE CORRIDOR -, \ ~ g -v: 1'-8' v: 4'-1 1' .,. 13'-1' ... 12 "-10" "-::r I\ 1\ ~- 1\ - NO. E QU IPMENT WORK-TOP REF RcGIRATOR WO RK-TO"' FREE ZE R 3 WORK T A B L E 4 I-lAND WA SI-4 S INK DOUBL::: OVER SHELF COFFE E M AKER 1 WAT E R BOIL ER 8 ICE MA'<.ER LOCKE R 10 STORAGE SI-IE L F II WATER HEATER 12 MOP S INK 1~'-!;" NO. :::cUIP MEN T 13 TI-H<=EE COM PARTM E NT S INK 14 PREP. S INK IS> FREEZER 10 R EF RIGERATOR LEGEN D ~ EX 15T!N6 CM..J WALL -..... [£] = EX I5TlNG DEMIS ING WALL, ADD .'JSJLATl ON 'ii::W NCN-BEARil'\C: F'A~TITIC'I NEW NCN-BEARII\,6: PARTITION \.LJ/ IN5ULATJCN E><l-=AUST FAt-.~ 50 C PM MIN. (TO OUTSID:: AIRJ EXIT L IUl-lT W/ BATiERY BACKUP W EMERGENC! L I G~T UJ/ BATTE R! BACKlJ? CD DOCR 1--AJMBE R LEVER J-!AND LE L ATCI-I, NO LOCK 1\ 1\- 1\ 1\- 1\ ROOM II ':1 O .L. hEXT TENANT CD ROOM DOOR (Tjp) 1\ .\ .\ _\- .\ .\- .\ .\- .\ -~- .\_ .\ .\ . ;:,..- - n '------' I I D ROOM 8 10 O .L . D ::\- ~-f----e---r-~ ~ I I 1\ 1\ I\ 13 '-&' TV - - ROOM 1 13 O.L. TV I ROOM 0 13 O.L. lsi I w " I II§' 1'-----TV ------w \2J 1_cV \2J 0 H J ~~~-~c o= R OOM :; ROOM 4 R OOM 3 ROOM 2 u - -10 O.Lc:::l-tl---w--+1[0'" OL ~ ; "OL "OL = ~ I I ~ -TY J TY 3J cH--11i--H~ o cE c:::~l-t-----W----+1 [0 8] c~[J cE I I I I I I w-------,.-1 ~I '-,----1,.----,-11-----il I I I I I I I UT ILITY/ CONTROL 12 '-0' 12'-0' u. 8 '-li' 8'-11 " 12'-GZ.l' 13'-0' 120'-6 ' FLOOR PLAN NEXT TEN ANT - REC EPTICN -- L OBBY 600 SF I IC> : 44 O .l. ROOM l"l n LC 111 I I 18-'-6' .\ C~ANC(S ..,.,1€ lel!IS/1~ C:.M.I D.T. looo.lt lilt. 114' • 1'-Zl' SHEET NO. T -2.0 I ~ Of -S'-IEETS Peggy Kuo From : Sent: To: Subject: Anand Pra sad 9072 Hermosa Drive Temp l e City, CA 91780 November 9, 2016 Adam Gulick, Assoc ia te Planner 9701 La s Tunas Drive Temple City, CA 91780 anand_p rasad @hotma il .com Wednesda y, November 09 , 2016 12:14 PM Adam Gulick Notie Of Publ ic Hearing (APN : 538 7 -013-031) Project Location : 9055 La s Tuna s Dr ive, Un it 125 (APN : 5387-013-031) Dear Mr. Gulick, ATTACHMENT I As an owner of on e of the property impacted by the subject project lo cation , I would li ke The City Counci l on 11/15/2016 to approve the Planning Commission decision to deny the request to estab l ish the karaoke televisi on bu siness . My i nput to the public heari ng -Thi s project sho uld be denied due to the location of th is t y pe of bu si ne ss adjoining to re side ntial houses. The operation of the bu siness in the night and early mornin g hours will have an impact on the safe t y, security and priv acy of the famil ies re si ding in the adjoining re si d ential houses . The bu siness will cau se an substantia l in cre ase in evening parking in the res idential stre et s nea r the bu si nes s, increa se in noi se from people/vehicles visiting KTV , tra sh, lo iterin g and will have a negative im pact on the quality of life of th e res idents . Please provide this email cor re spondence to The City Council in regard s to the publ ic hearin g on this project. Thank you. Regards, Anand Pra sa d 1 ATTACHMENT J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: November 15, 2016 TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Bryan Cook, City Manager Via : Michael D . Forbes, AICP, Commun ity Development Director Scott Reim ers , Planning Manager By : Adam Gulick, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A 7,891 SQUARE FOOT KARAOKE TELEVISION (KTV) BUSINESS IN THE CAMELLIA SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER, LOCATED AT 9055 LAS TUNAS DRIVE , UNIT 125 RECOMMENDATION: The City Council is requested to continue the public hearing to date uncerta in . BACKGROUND: The applicant of the above case appea le d the Planning Commission 's decision denying the Conditional Use Permit. After scheduling this item for a publ ic hearing and sending out public notices the applicant requested that the City Council continue this item. The applicant is requesting additional time to prepare a thorough response to the City's and the community's concerns . When a new hearing date is chosen , staff will send public hearing notices at least ten days prior to the hearing date. ATTACHMENT: A. Appl ica nt's request to continue the publ ic hearing (d ated November 10 , 2016) Adam Gulick From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Good Morning Scott, cc chang <ccc_pe rmits@yahoo.com> Thursda y, November 10, 2016 11:10 A M Scott Reimers; Adam Gulick ; -Xing Xi ng; Chr ist ina May eda ; Angela Deng Fw : KTV -Public Hearing schedule nitice CC PH Notice, PL 15 -316, 9055 Las Tunas Dr, .pdf Thank you for the phone call this morning regarding our Appeal. Please find this email as our formal request that the Owner of the proposed KTV project Ms. Xing Xing would like to continue our appeal date from Nov 15 to a later date. We are currently assisting the client to prepare additional operation history for few of the existing local KTV establishments. We appreciate your consideration in processing our request, and we will work with your department to schedule the next available date for the City Council Meeting. Best Regards C . C . Chang Project Consultant (Cell) 626-533-5959 ccc _permits@ yahoo.com