The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About9A ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO 10-4688 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR FY 2009-10AGENDA ITEM 9.A. TemMEMORANDUM CC..�� ty Staff Report TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL DATE: AUGUST 3, 2010 FROM: JOSE E. PULIDO, CITY MANAGER' BY: JOSEPH M. LAMBERT, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MANAGER SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: TO CERTIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009- 2010 BY ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 10-4688 SUMMARY In 1992, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) implemented the Congestion Management Program (CMP). In accordance with this program, every city must make an annual determination of conformance. The attached draft Resolution No. 10-4688 is the City's self -certification for fiscal year 2009-2010. BACKGROUND The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) Congestion Management Program (CMP) was developed in response to the passage of Proposition 111 in 1990. Proposition 111 provided an increase in the State Gas Tax to fund regional transportation improvements (Streets and Highways Code, Section 2105) and created the CMP to monitor regional transportation conditions. Conformance with the CMP assures that local agencies are providing transportation improvements to offset the traffic congestion resulting from new development. If a city does not conform to the CMP, that city's share of the Gas Tax increase provided by Proposition 111 may be withheld and allocated to the County to use on regional transportation projects. The Congestion Management Program requires that certain provisions be placed within the City's Zoning Code to address traffic congestion, which may be associated with new development. The CMP also requires an annual monitoring of pre -designated traffic corridors. In Temple City, the only CMP designated route is Rosemead Boulevard. At this time, the City Council is asked to consider adoption of the annual self - certification Resolution. The City is in full compliance with the CMP in that all of the development review requirements have been codified into the Zoning Code and all monitoring has been completed or is scheduled for completion. City Council August 3, 2010 CMP Certification FISCAL IMPACT 2 Conformance with the Congestion Management Program will allow the City to receive the State Gas Tax funds pursuant to Proposition 111 which will amount to approximately $565,085 this fiscal year. RECOMMENDATION 1. Open Public Hearing 2. Hear those for and against 3. Close public hearing 4. Adopt Resolution No. 10-4688, certifying conformance with the Congestion Management Program ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft Resolution No. 10-4688 2. Local Development Report RESOLUTION NO. 10-4688 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T EMP, F CITY. CALIFORNIA FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT REPORI IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SEC,110N 65089 WHEREAS, CMP Statute requires the Los Angeles County Met000lita^ Transocrtaton Au:^ority ("LACMTA') acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los A igeles Cot.—:y, :c; en .ial y determ ne that the County aria C t:es within the County are conforming to all CMP requ rerle,its, drat WHEREAS, LACMTA requires submittal of the CMP Local Deveiopmont Report Dy September 1 of each year. and WHEREAS, Inc City Council held a noticed public hearing on August 3, 2010, NOW; THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DOLS HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1. -t hat the City of Temple City has taken all of the following act,ons, and :-c: :I,(,, City is r conformance wit,i al! aop'ucaole requirements of the 2004 CMP adopted Dy the LRCM : A 3oard 0, J,.iy 22 2004 By June 15, of odd-numoered years Inc City of Temple City aas arc: w" cont rr.c to conduct annual traffic counts and calculated levels of service `or seeded rate,ial ntersecuons, consistent with the requirements Identifica i the CIVP iq^way and Roadway System chapter. 2 The City of Temple Cdy has locally adopted and cont hues to a^ploy- er, t: Ir„rs_ atioi demand management ordinance, consistent witin the rr nimu,r requ remerts uert'iud r the CMP Transportat,on Demand Management chanter 3 The C ty o` Temple CGty has locally aeopted and continues to a er r=:r' a ianr+ use analysis program consistent with the minimum requirements ioemifec ir, the: CMP :and Use Analysis Program chapter 4 The C ty of Temple City has adopted a Local Development Report attached nereto and made a part hereof, consistent with the requirements identfed r tie Draft 200”, CMP chis report balances traffic congestion impacts due to growtn witr r t're Cdy of Temple City with transportation improvements, and demonstrates t - Ft tie C :y o` Terrp'e C'ty s meeting its responsibilities under the Countywide Deficiency Plar, cors siert with me LACMTA Board adopted 2003 Short Range Transportanori Plan SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolutor and sha I `o,ward a copy of anis Reso ut!on to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Trar.sportat or, At,thonty T he City C'Ic;rk s'na I enter this Resolution into the book of original resolutions PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this aro day of August 2010, MAYOR Resolution No. 10-4688 Page 2 ATTEST City Clerk I hereby certify that the forego,ng resolution, Resolution No 10-4688, was c Jy uassec, epprovec and adopted by the City Council of the: City of Temple City at a regular meeting eld o- the 3rd ; ay o` Ajcus: 2010 by the following vote AYES- Cowualmember- NOES Counalmember- ABSENT Cou,,cilmember- ABSTAIN Councilmernber- City Cierk '5 d City of Temple City Date Prepared: July 27, 2010 2010 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2009 - MAY 31, 2010 Contact: Joseph M. Lambert Phone Number: (626) 285-2171 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY IMPORTANT: All "#value!" cells on this page are automatically calculated. Please do not enter data in these cells. DEVELOPMENT TOTALS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Dwelling Units Single Family Residential 6.00 Multi -Family Residential 10.00 Group Quarters 0.00 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY 1,000 Net Sq.Ft 2 Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00 NON -RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY 1,000 Net Sq.Ft.2 Lodging ( 0.00 Industrial 0.00 Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) ( 5.99 Office (50.000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Medical 0.00 Government 0.00 Institutional/Educational 0.00 University (# of students) 0.00 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Daily Trips Er!TER IF .APPLICABLE 0.00 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT TOTALS Exempted Dwelling Units 3 Exempted Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1.000s) 0 1, Note Please change dates on this form for later years Section 1, Page 1 2. Net square feet is the difference between new development and adjustments entered on pages 2 and 3. City Of Temple City Date Prepared: July 27, 2010 2010 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2009 - MAY 31, 2010 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0." Category Dwelling Units Single Family Residential 27.00 Multi -Family Residential 10.00 Group Quarters 0.00 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft or more) 0.00 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0,00 NON -RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Lodging 0.00 Industrial 0.00 Office (less than 50.000 sq.fL) 5.99 Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Medical 0.00 Government 0.00 Institutional/Educational 0.00 University (# of students) 0,00 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description Daily Trips (Attach additional sheets if necessary) (Enter "0' it none; ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 Section I, Page 2 City of Temple City Date Prepared: July 27, 2010 2010 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2009 - MAY 31, 2010 Enter data for all cells labeled "E.=-." If there are no data for that category, enter "0." IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) development permits that were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any structure with the reporting period. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Dwelling Units Single Family Residential Multi -Family Residential Group Quarters COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) Freestanding Eating & Drinking NON -RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Lodging Industrial ; Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) Office (300,000 sqft or more) Medical Government Institutional/Educational University (# of students) OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description Daily Trips (Attach additional sheets if necessary) - _ _ Section 1, Page 3 City of Temple City Date Prepared: July 27, 2010 2010 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2009 - MAY 31, 2010 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0." INCLUDED IN LowNery Low Income Housing High Density Residential Near Rail Stations Mixed Use Developments Near Rail Stations Development Agreements Entered into Prior to July 10, 1989 Reconstruction of Buildings Damaged in April 1992 Civil Unrest Reconstruction of Buildings Damaged in Jan. 1994 Earthquake Total Dwelling Units Total Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s) 31 Dwelling Units 01 Dwelling Units 01 1,000 Gross Square Feet 01 Dwelling Units 01 1,000 Gross Square Feet 01 Dwelling Units 01 1,000 Gross Square Feet 01 Dwelling Units 01 1,000 Gross Square Feet 01 Dwelling Units Section I, Page 4 Exempted Development Definitions: 1. Low/Very Low Income Housing As defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development as follows: - Low -Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size. - Very Low -Income: equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size. 2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: Development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre is automatically considered high density. 3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: Mixed-use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high density residential housing. 4. Development Agreements: Projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under Section 65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989. 5. Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non-residential structure which is damaged or destroyed, to the extent of > or = to 50% of its reasonable value. by fire, flood, earthquake or other similar calamity. 6. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning regulations and where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval/disapproval authority. These locally precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LDR.