HomeMy Public PortalAbout89 201_4103 Linda Vista Ave 4051 Linda Vista Ave��. P L A N N I N G D E P A R T M E N T
M 1 6 0 0 F i r s t S t r e e t
P O B o x 7 1 1 R O M p a , C a l i f o r n i a 9 4 5 5 9 - 0 6 6 0
C I T Y o f N A P A A P P L I C A T I O N F O R L A N D U S E ( 7 0 7 ) 2 5 7 - 9 5 3 0
A C T I O N A M I D D E S I G N R E V I E W
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
2 - 1 e ) i z o n i n g : R L - ! k /
P R O J E C T # 8 9 - - 6
D a t e F i l e d : G e n e r a l P l a n : I 2
R e g s t d . D e p o s i t : P i n g . A r e a :
A m o u n t R e c e i v e d : t 0 B a c k g r o u n d F i s :
T a x R o l e p r o p e r t y O w n e r :
Q
I Q ( I N Q U I R Y ������, �� G O A N ( ) A N N E X A T I O N
C R ( ) C M K P T U A L D E S I G N R E V I E W ` C Q ( ) E N V I R O N M E N T A L R E V I E W
L P
P R ( ) P D E S I G N R E V I E W . ������ F p 1 P p P ` D B ( ) D E N S I T Y B O N U S
F R ( ) F I N A L D E S I G N R E V I E W - ( ) D R C - ) , A S R ( ) S P E C I A L S I D F I M I T I A L
P A ( ) P R E l A p P L I C A T I O N �� q p i G P ( ) G I I Q F R A T , P L A N A N S
P M ( ) P A R C E L M A P �� i i i
; �� , . - , R P ( R E L O C A T I O N P E R M I T
)
P Z ( . ) P R E Z O N I N G D O N O T W R f T i I N U P ( ) U S E P E R M I T
R Z O R E Z O N I N G T H I S S P A C E V A ( ) V A R I A N C E
S A ( V S U B D I V I S I O N M A P O F F I C E U S E O N L Y Z O ( ) Z O N I N G O R D . A M E N D M E N T
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
p R E A P P L I C A T I C N N O T I N G R D Q U I R E D F M A L L M A J M A P P L I C A T I O N S
A l l a p p l i c a n t s s h o u l d d e t e r m i n e t h e S t a t e C o d e r e q u i r e m e n t s w h i c h m a y a p p l y t o
t h e i r p r o j e c t s b y c o n f e r r i n g w i t h t h e C h i e f B u i l d i n g I n s p e c t o r a n d F i r e M a r s h a l .
Y o u s h o u l d b e p r e s e n t a t t h e p u b l i c h e a r i n g o n y o u r a p p l i c a t i o n t o b r i e f l y
e x p l a i n y o u r r e q u e s t a n d a n s w e r q u e s t i o n s . F a i l u r e t o a t t e n d t h e h e a r i n g m a y
d e l a y t h e r e v i e w p r o c e s s a n d r e q u i r e t h a t y o u r a p p l i c a t i o n b e c o n t i n u e d .
N o t e C o n c e r n i n g E x h i b i t s : A L L E X H I B I T S S H A L L B E R E D U C E D O R F O L D E D T O 8 1 / 2 " x
1 1 " T O F A C I L I T A T E M A I L I N G A N D D I S T R I B U T I O N .
P R O i = N A M E : P A C K A R D - P � f t k - @ E e ' S ' T 9 T t S
S i t e A d d r e s s : 4 1 0 3 & 4 0 5 1 L i n d a V i s t a A v e n u e
N e a r e s t C r o s s S t r e e t / d i r e c t i o n t o p a r c e l T r o w e r A v e n u e
0 7 - 1 0 2 - 4 6
A P N 0 7 - 1 5 2 - 2 5 P r o j e c t a r e a : 9 1 , 6 8 8 s q . f t . 2 . 1 a c r e s
A P P L I C A N T
B L E V I N S - D A V I S O N
M a i l i n g A d d r e s s
C i t y N a p
S i g n a t u r e
( L a s t N a m e ]
4 . 0 4 5 L i n d a V i s t a v e n u e
0 - _ . o L L C �� K R P h o n e
B U S I N E S S O W N E R N / A
L a s t N a m e F i r s t
M a i l i n g A d d r e s s
D a t e
7 0 7 2 5 7 - 6 2 o 4 I
C i t y S t a t e z i p P h o n e ( )
P R O P E R T Y O W N E R B l e v i n s , G e o r g e I r w i n , B r u c e
( L a s t N a m e F i r s t )
M a i l i n g A d d r e s s 4 0 4 5 L i n d a V i s t a A v e . 4 0 5 1 L i n d a V i s t a A v e .
C i t y N a p a S t a t e C a . Z i p 9 4 5 5 U P h o n e ( 7 0 7 ) 2 5 7 - : 2 0 4
C o s : s e n t o f E 0 2 2 M O w n e r . T h e c o n s e n t t o t h e f i l i n g o f t h i s a p p l i c a a n o n b y t h e
p r o p e r t y o w n e r i n c l u d e s t h e a g r e e m e n t o f t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r t o p a y Y l
d e v e l o p m e n t f e e s i m p o s e d b y P o l i c y R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 6 ( a s i t m a y b e a m e n d e d i n
t h e f u t u r e ) i n t h e e v e n t o f t h e a p p l i c a n t ' s f a i l u r e t o p a y s a i d f e e s .
I h e r e b y c o n s e n t _ _ _ _
t o t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n } = "
S i L u r e a D a t e
I f y o u d e s i r e n o t i c e o f t h e m e e t i n g t o b e s e n t t o p a r t i e s o t h e r t h a n t h e
a p p l i c a n t , p l e a s e l i s t t h e i r n a m e s , a d d r e s s e s a n d t e l e p h o n e n u m b e r s :
T o m D a v i s o n P . O . B o x 1 4 5 3 , S o n o m a , C a . 9 5 4 7 6
C h a u d h a r y & A s s o 3 2 7 2 V i l l a L a n e , N a p a , C a . 9 4 5 5 8
1
0 CITY OF NAPA 0
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT Agenda Item No.
December 5 1989
Public Hearing on Packard Estates, an Application by George Blevins and
Thomas Davidson to Subdivide a 2.0 Acre Parcel at 4051 and 4103 Linda Vista
Avenue into 9 Residential Lots.
Planning Department
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOC'ATION:
This application seeks approval to subdivide a 2.0 acre parcel of land at
4051 and 4103 Linda Vista Avenue into 9 residential lots ranging in size
from 5,850 to 10,300 square feet at an overall density of 4.5 units to the
acre. The lots will be accessed from a new public street extended from
Linda Vista Avenue. The existing single family dwellings (located on Lots
8 and 9) will be retained at their present locations.
APPROVALS REQUIRED BY APPLICANT: (Blevins-Davidson)
1. A Variance (VA -1) to allow the existing residence on Lot 9 to encroach
13' into the required 20' front setback from Packard Court.
2. A Variance (VA -2) to allow the existing residence on Lot 8 to encroach
8' into the required 20' front setback from Linda Vista Avenue.
3. A Variance (VA -3) to allow the existing residence on Lot 8 to encroach
11' into the required 15' side setback from Packard Court.
4. A Tentative Subdivision Map to divide the property into 9 residential
lots.
CEQA Exempt X EIR prepared - Linda Vista
Specific Plan
Negative Declaration prepared
Previous CEQA document; no additional review
required
PLANNING CCKnSSION HEARING: (Novegnber 2, 1989)
Following a brief presentation of the applicants' 9 lot subdivision,
Supervising Civil Engineer Bob Peterson presented an alternative design
recommended by the Public Works Department. This alternative (described in
the Novenber 1 and November 27, 1989 Public Works Department memoranda)
would provide a second access to the adjacent Teaford property to the
north; however, it was pointed out that there may be an inadequate
turn -around area for emergency vehicles at the end of the cul-de-sac if the
adjacent property isn't developed at this time. The Commission suggested a
continuance to allow the Fire Department to comment on the Public Works
Council � ReportA endo - Blevins-Davidson 40 Page 2
Agenda
Department alternative. Mr. Bud Waddell, representing the applicants,
requested that the public hearing not be continued.
After a brief discussion of the issues, the Commission voted to recommend
the Tentative Subdivision Map be denied. However, the Commission noted
that if the Council determines that the applicants' plan should be
approved, there was no objection to the requested Variances. The Planning
Commission then moved to recommend approval of the three requested
Variances; these additional motions passed on a set of 3-0 votes.
Council should note that the 11/27/89 Public Works memo confirms that the
Fire Department has subsequently reviewed the alternative street design and
would require a fire truck turnaround at the property line until the road
is extended to the Teaford property to the north.
COMMISSION RECCHMENIDATION:
1. The Commission recommended by a vote of 3-0 (Commissioner Cudaback
absent and Commissioner Macomber abstaining) that the City Council find
that the previously adopted Environmental Impact Report for the Linda
Vista Specific Plan is adequate to assess the impacts and required
mitigation measures associated with this project.
2. The Commission recommended the Tentative Map be denied by a vote of
2-1. (Commissioner Cortese voting no, Commissioner Cudaback absent,
and Commissioner Macomber abstaining) .
3. The Commission recommended the Variance (VA -1) to allow the existing
residence on Lot 9 to encroach 13' into the required 20' front setback
from Packard Court be approved by a vote of 3 to 0. (Commissioner
Cudaback absent and Commissioner Macomber abstaining).
4. The Commission recommended the Variance (VA -2) to allow the existing
residence on Lot 9 to encroach 8' into the required 20' front setback
fran Linda Vista Avenue be approved by a vote of 3 to 0. (Commissioner
Cudaback absent and Commissioner Macomber abstaining).
5. The Commission recommended the Variance (V-3) to allow the existing
residence on Lot 8 to encroach 11' into the required 15' side setback
from Packard Court. (Commissioner Cudaback absent and Commissioner
Macomber abstaining).
Appealed: ( ) Yes (x) No; however, Council action is
required without formal appeal.
DOCUME2'I'S ATTACHED:
November 2, 1989 Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes
November 1, 1989 Public Works Department Memorandum
November 27, 1989 Public Works Department Memorandum
C g _. Council Agenda S)A Report - Blevins-Davidson 46 Page 3
ODUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Incorporate the oral and written testimony received by the Planning
Coamtission into the record of the public hearing.
2. Find that the previously adopted Environmental Impact Report for the
Linda Vista Specific Plan is adequate to assess the impacts and
required mitigation measures associated with this project.
3.
Move approval or denial of Variance (VA -1) to allow
the existing
residence on Lot 9 to encroach 13' into the required 20'
front setback
from Packard Court.
4.
Move approval or denial of Variance (VA -2) to allow
the existing
residence on Lot 8 to encroach 8' into the required 20'
front setback
from Linda Vista Avenue.
5.
Move approval or denial of Variance (VA -3) to allow
the existing
residence on Lot 8 to encroach 11' into the required 15'
side setback
from Packard Court.
6.
Move approval or denial of the Tentative Subdivision Map to divide this
2.0 acre parcel into 9 lots.
NOTE:
Resolutions will be prepared based on the City Council
action.
" JLC:lls:ljs
.� cc: Blevins-Davidson
Bruce Irvin
Chaudhary and Associates, Inc.
J. C. Waddell
C MUM/CCDECO1/TXTLIB2
0
QTY OF NAPA
::1
PLANNING DEPARMGM - 1600 FIRST STREET - NAPA, CA 94559
November 2, 1989
AGENDA ITEM 04: 89 -201 -SA, PACKARD ESTATES, (Blevins-Davidson)
APPLICATION FILED: 07/17/89 ACCEPTED AS COMPLETE: 08/16/89
LOCATION OF 4103 & 4051 Linda Vista Avenue
PROPERTY: APN 7-102-46 &7-152-25
(NERAL PLAN: LR, Low Density Residential
ZONING: RL -6, Residential District
APPLICANT: Blevins-Davidson
4045 Linda Vista Avenue
Napa, CA 94558 (707)257-5204
PROPERTY George Blevins
OWNER: 4045 Linda Vista Avenue
Napa, CA 94558 (707) 257-6204
"k Bruce Irwin
4051 Linda Vista Avenue
Napa, CA 94558 (707) 257-6204
PRD= DESCRIPTION
This application seeks approval to subdivide a 2.0 acre parcel of land at
4051 and 4103 Linda Vista Avenue into 9 residential lots ranging in size
from 5,850 to 10,300 square feet at an overall density of 4.5 units to the
acre. The lots will be accessed from a new public street extended from
Linda Vista Avenue. The existing single family dwellings (located on Lots
8 and 9) will be retained at their present locations.
Applications for final action by the City Council following the Planning
Commission recommendations:
1. A Variance (VA -1) to allow the existing residence on Lot 9 to encroach
13' into the required 20' front setback from Packard Court.
2. A Variance (VA -2) to allow the existing residence on Lot 8 to encroach
8' into the required 20' front setback from Linda Vista Avenue.
3. A Variance (VA -3) to allow the existing residence on Lot 8 to encroach
11' into the required 15' side setback fran Packard Court.
Packard Estates (Blefs-Davidson)
0 Page 2
4. A Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide the property into 9
residential lots (Sec. 23-40).
ANALYSIS: GENERAL PIAN/LINDA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN
This property is classified LR, Low Density Residential by the 1982 General
Plan, and designated LR -H, Low Density High Range Residential (4.5-6
dwelling units per acre) by the Linda Vista Specific Plan. The subdivision
and proposed density of 4.5 dwelling units per acre are consistent with the
Linda Vista Specific Plan designation, which requires a minimum of 9 units
on the property.
ANALYSIS: ZCNIW
The 2.0 acre parcel is designated RL-4.5/6:SP84-112, Residential on the
zoning map. The lots to be created by the subdivision satisfy the
develognent standards of this district.
ANALYSIS: CEgA
In October 1987 the City adopted the Linda Vista Specific Plan which
revised land use designations and recommnded infrastructure improvements
necessary to serve anticipated development. The Specific Plan included a
strategy to finance the required infrastructure improvements and proposed:
(1) the formation of a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District; and (2)
-4 adoption of an impact fee.
r
A Master Environmental Impact Report was prepared to evaluate the probable
effects of the Specific Plan. This Master EIR was certified by the City
prior to adoption of the Linda Vista Specific Plan.
Section 15182 of the CEQA Guidelines provides that where an agency has
prepared an EIR on a specific plan after January 1, 1980, no EIR or
Negative Declaration need be prepared for a residential project undertaken
pursuant to and in conformity to that specific plan unless:
(1) Subsequent changes are proposed in the project which will require
important revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to
the involvement of new significant environmental impacts not
considered in a previous EIR or negative declaration on the project;
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under
which the project is undertaken, such as a substantial deterioration
in the air quality where the project will be located, which will
require important revisions in the previous EIR or negative
declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental
impacts not covered in a previous EIR or negative declaration; or
(3) New information of substantial importance to the project becomes
available, and
(a) The information was not known and could not have been known at
the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative
declaration was adopted, and
Packard. Estates (Bl*s-Davidson) 0 Page 3
(b) The new information shows any of the following:
1. The project will have one or more significant effects not
discussed previously in the EIR;
2. Significant effects previously examined will be
substantially more severe than shown in the EIR;
3. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to
be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially
reduce one or more significant effects of the project; or
4. Mitigation measures or alternatives which were not
previously considered in the EIR would substantially lessen one
or more significant effects on the environment.
An Initial Study on the present application has resulted in the
determination that there are no new or unanticipated impacts from this
project, that the envi ronmmmental analysis completed for the Specific Plan
does cover this application, and that no additional site specific
mitigation measures are required. However, all mitigation measures
identified in the Master EIR are applicable.
Prior to commencement of the public hearing on this project, the Planning
Commission must first determine its compliance with CEQA.
,- ANALYSIS: DESIGN REVIEW
• This nine(9) lot subdivision will have seven(7) lots fronting on a proposed
city standard street beginning on the west side of Linda Vista Avenue and
extending approximately 290' to a cul-de-sac. The nine(9) lots range in
size from 5,850 square feet to 10,300 square feet.
The subdivision plan is straight forward and raises no special design
issues. It should be noted that a 24" diameter tree stands at the center
of the street entrance from Linda Vista Drive. The proposed street
alignment will require the removal of this tree. However, new street trees
will be planted along both sides of the cul-de-sac.
Given these findings, staff believes that no special Design Review
conditions are necessary and recommends that the following standard
conditions be imposed:
1. The exhibits submitted for Final Design Review shall conform
substantially to the exhibits reviewed and approved by the Planning
Commission for Preliminary Design Review and marked as EXHIBIT A.
2. The Planning Commission delegates to the Planning Director the
determination of "substantial conformance."
3. The Planning Commission delegates to the Planning Director the review
and approval of the Final Design Review application.
4. If, due to the continuing drought situation, the City Council declares
a Stage I Voluntary Conservative Program all new development occurring
on lots created by this subdivision shall be prohibited fran installing
Packard Estates (BlOns-Davidson)
0 Page 4
any new outside landscaping, swimming pools, spas, or other water
dependent exterior improvements until the emergency is declared ended
by the City Council.
5. A six(6) foot tall solid wooden fence shall be installed around the
perimeter of the subdivision.
W 0 y Ame V,_Z I D. k, 0 4:Yj 4 D.ks , 4ID."Ir : ye -kn
Staff believes that the requested Variances from the development standards
of the RL -6 District for Lots 8 and 9 are appropriate and that the
necessary findings can be made to recommend approval. These Variances (to
authorize encroachments into the front and side setbacks) are necessary
because of the placement of the existing houses in relation to the
alignment of Packard Court, a new public street.
The Commission should note the Public Works Department's recommendation
that the Subdivision Map be denied (see the September 26, 1989 memorandum
from Mr. John E. Draper, Civil Engineer III). Mr. Draper notes that the
proposed development of this subdivision fails to provide public street
access to the 1.0 acres parcel immediately to the north. He contends that
this failure precludes orderly development of the adjoining property and
may -result in the use of a private street for access. Staff notes that the
1.0 acre property has a development potential of 5-6 dwelling units under
the current zoning and that development options including a single-family
dwelling, multiple detached rental units under one ownership, or a set of
residential condominium units.
The Cmmnission should also be
• (LVSP) requires the developnent
acre property. The Public Works
one lot from the subdivision
revised).
aware that the Linda Vista Specific Plan
of at least 9 dwelling units on this 2.0
Department recommendation would eliminate
(unless the present lot configuration is
The subdivision must be consistent 1
the Linda Vista Specific Plan in o:
m -
Planning C Lission concurs with the
to provide access to the adjacent
must be recc mended for denial or
residential development and a stree
to the adjacent property.
CEQA Action:
ith both the General Plan as well as
der to be approved. Therefore if the
Public Works Department recommendation
property, the subdivision application
revised to include both a 9 unit
alignment which provides a connection
• 1 •: 'ISS• ID. I r
Recommend to City Council that no EIR or negative declaration is required
for this residential project given the City's adoption of a Master EIR and
Specific Plan for development in the Linda. Vista Planning Area, provided
that the mitigation measures necessary to serve the anticipated development
are found to be substantially in place prior to recordation of the final
map and/or issuance of any permits for the project.
Packard Estates (BlAs-Davidson) • Page 5
Project Action:
Close the public hearing, review the Public Works Department memo dated
9/26/89 and take action on the application. Draft findings and conditions
are provided for consideration by the Commission.
VARIANCE FINDINGS (see Exhibit 1)
VARIANCE CONDITIMS (VA -1, VA -2, VA -3)
Planning Department Standard Conditions:
1. The Variance must be used within two (2) years of approval or it
shall expire. (Sec. 30-523)
2. The Variance is not effective until ten (10) working days frau the
date of Planning Commission final action (Sec. 30537-(b)).
3. The time within which judicial review of the City's final decision
on this project must be sought is governed by Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.6.
4. Any request for an extension of the variance authorized by this
action must be justified in writing and received by the Planning
Department at least thirty (30) days prior to expiration. (Sec.
30-532)
5. All construction and improvements shall be consistent with the
plans reviewed during the public hearing at which this project was
approved (EXHIBIT A).
Public Works Department: No comments received.
Chief Building Inspector: No comments received.
Fire Marshal: No comments received.
Environmental Health Department: No comments received.
Napa Sanitation District: No comments received.
Parks and Recreation Department: No cc mients received.
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS (see Exhibit 2)
� w � : � ��- • •• a •. �.
Planning Department Standard Conditions:
1. All construction and improvements shall be consistent with the
plans reviewed during the public hearing at which this project was
approved.
Packard Estates (Bl*s-Davidson)
0 Page 6
2. The tentative map shall expire 24 months after approval. Any
request for an extension must be filed at least 30 days prior to
expiration.
Public Works Department: See mentis dated 8/16/89 and 9/26/89.
Chief Building Inspector: See memo dated 9/22/89.
Fire Marshal: See memo dated 7/24/89.
Environmental Health Department: See menro dated 8/9/89.
Napa Sanitation District: See memo dated 7/26/89.
Parks and Recreation Department: See memo dated 7/27/89.
Prepared by:
F. Eldon Peter
Assistant Planner
FEP:lls
cc: Blevins-Davidson
Chaudhary and Associates, Inc.
J. C. Waddell
SR04/PCNOVOl/TXTLIB2
Ll
CITY Off' NAPA
PUBLIC WOM DEPA0II4M
TO: PLANNING DIRECTOR, John Yost
FROM: CIVIL ENGINEER III, John E. DrapeVZ U
DATE: November 27, 1989
SUBJECT: Packard Estates Subdivision Project No.89-201-SA
Location: 4103 and 4051 Linda Vista Ave, APN:7-102-46 & 7-152-25
•• I Na offo ti -J IcZ4Z
In the Public Works Department memo dated November 1, 1989, it was
recommended that the Packard Estates Tentative Subdivision Map be denied.
That recommendation was made in an effort to support the City Council's
goals and policies regarding private streets. Our interpretation of those
goals and policies is based on 1) Policy Resolution No. 22 Establishing
Policy Statement For Private Streets (attached), (2) March 16, 1989
memorandum from Lynda Millspaugh regarding implementation of NMC Section
23-142 Public/Private Streets (attached) and 3) City Council comments on
recent applications which proposed private streets.
The applicants proposed street design would serve all lots within it's
boundary with a public street. However, the adjoining vacant parcel to the
north (Teaford) would be left with no possibility for development with a
public street due to it's narrow width. If the existing strong trend for
single family detached houses continues, it is likely that the Teaford
property would be proposed for development with flag lots or a private
street serving single family houses.
The preferred public street design for Packard Estates is shaven on
Figure 1 of the November 1, 1989 memorandum. It requires approximately the
same area for street right-of-way. It would allow development of nine lots
similar to those shown on the Tentative Map except that one flag lot would
be needed. The Fire Department has reviewed this design and would require
the initial 25 feet of the flag lot driveway to be designated as a fire
truck turnaround until the cul-de-sac is constructed on the Teaford
property. The Teaford property could then be developed with four lots
served off the cul-de-sac and two fronting on Linda Vista Avenue. No
private streets would be needed.
The alternate design was proposed because our interpretation of the
City Council's private street policy is that we should attempt to avoid
creating a situation where a parcel has little choice but to propose a
private street development in the future. This is a part of the planning
process. The applicant does not want to modify his project, hence our
recommendation of denial.
As can be seen from this example, the private street policy is quite
complex and requires interpretation by staff and applicants. Any
additional direction by City Council regarding the interpretation of
private street policies would be beneficial.
The following requirement should be added to the conditions of
approval listed in the Public Works Department memorandum dated November 1,
1989.
1. Grant a ten (10) foot wide public utility easement behind the
entire length of proposed sidewalk including the portions on
Linda Vista Avenue and Packard Court.
cs
PACKESTATE/TEMP/TXTLIB3
0 City of Napa, California
INTER -OFFICE MEMO
TO: John Yost, Planning Director 07/27/89
FILM: Bob Carlsen, Parks Superintendent 9/11"-' REVIEWED BY:MattiIa
SUBJECT: PICTECT NM E:Packard Estates
PIDJEGT #:89 -201 -SA
Parks and Recreation Department staff has reviewed the above project
and has the following requirements:
1. Park Development and Acquisition Fees to be paid at time building
permits are issued.
2. Street trees are required on all public streets. A refundable
deposit of $200.00 per street tree is to be paid at the time
building permits are issued. Street trees frau the City of Napa
Street Tree List are to be planted in accordance with City specifi-
cations.
3. All landscape within the public Right -Of -Way to be maintained by
adjacent property owner or a hamowners association. Plantings
must conform to Section 27 of the Napa Municipal Code.
4. Additional requirement as follows:
_ Payment of Las Flores Recreation Center Fee of $700.00 per dwelling
unit.
Wo 41V •4 C . •. • 8 `1 X11
Date I lag /'R!'
TO: Planning Director
City of Napa
P. O. Box 660
Napa, CA 94559
The Napa Sanitation District has reviewed the above-
named application, which will ge reviewed at the -Interde-
partmental Staff Meeting on Cj"
• The current Napa Sanitation District Fees and Charges
for his proposed use of the property are as follows.
�.S
.J Y7.
The District should be contacted by the owner prior to
development, as these fees change from time to time and vary
with the proposed use. I would appreciate it if you would
incorporate this information as a part of your consideration
of the application.
truly y r
(/
//
ban R. Baker
Iffice Manager
JRB:bj
1)edic4W Rim ion GeKmca&a to coocei
950 IMOLA AVENUE WEST P. O. BOX 2480 NAPA, CALIFORNIA 94558 TELEPHONE 252-3511, AREA CODE 707
T2?23?�0
NAPA FIRE DEPARTMENT /Ji,tQ
INTER -OFFICE MEMO , '9
�68C 9 5 �l�C'2'y
TO: JOHN YOST, PLANNING DIRECTOR DATE: July 24 ,1989
FROM: Tom Johnson, Fire Marshal/Reviewed by Steve Ceriani
SUBJECT: 89-201; Packard Estates; 4103 and 4051 Linda Vista Avenue
The above named project must comply with the requirements listed
below. Any questions concerning these requirements or standards
should be brought to the attention of the Fire Prevention Bureau.
Permits required herein are obtained from the Fire Prevention
Bureau.
PROJECT ACCESS
1. No gates or barriers are to be installed.
2. Access surface shall be paved to City Standards.
3. The minimum clear access width for this project is public
street width.
4. No speed bumps or dips are allowed in roadway or parking
areas.
5. Post address on building(s). Use 6" numbers on building.
6. Street names (public and private) must be approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau and street name signs shall be installed in
accordance with Public Works standards.
CONSTRUCTION•
7. Roof coverings shall be non-combustible or fire retardant.
8. Siding: No untreated wood shingles or shakes.
9. Exiting shall conform to the Uniform Building Code.
10. The building or occupancy must conform to U.B.C., U.F.C., and
City Standards.
"
f
8 9 - 2 0 1 ; P a c k a r d E s t a t e s , 4 1 0 3 a n d 4 0 5 1 L i n d a V i s t a A v e P a g e 2
J u l y 2 4 , 1 9 8 9
F I R E P R O T E C T I O N :
1 1 . H y d r a n t s a r e t o b e i n s t a l l e d w i t h i n 1 5 0 f e e t o f a n y c o m m e r c i a l
s t r u c t u r e ( i n c l u d i n g R - 1 o c c u p a n c i e s ) a n d 2 5 0 f e e t o f
r e s i d e n t i a l s t r u c t u r e s . O f f s t r e e t h y d r a n t s a r e r e q u i r e d f o r
l a r g e p r o j e c t s . I n s t a l l a t i o n o f h y d r a n t m a r k e r s i n s t r e e t s
i s r e q u i r e d .
1 2 . T h e i n s t a l l a t i o n o f a n A u t o m a t i c F i r e S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m
c o n f o r m i n g t o N . F . P . A . 1 3 D a n d C i t y s t a n d a r d s i s r e q u i r e d f o r
t h e b u i l d i n g ( s ) i n t h i s p r o j e c t . A P E R M I T f o r i n s t a l l a t i o n
m u s t b e o b t a i n e d f r o m t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t .
N O T E : T h e d e v e l o p e r / p r o j e c t o w n e r i s r e q u i r e d t o o r d e r a m i n i m u m
o f 1 " i n c h w a t e r m e t e r a t e a c h b u i l d i n g s i t e a n d i n s t a l l a
S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a " H e a l t h D e p a r t m e n t A p p r o v e d " d o u b l e c h e c k
v a l v e a s s e m b l y b a c k f l o w p r e v e n t i o n d e v i c e . ( C o n t a c t C i t y
W a t e r D e p a r t m e n t f o r d e t a i l s . )
F I R E W A R N I N G :
1 3 . E a c h r e s i d e n t i a l l i v i n g u n i t ( h o u s e , a p a r t m e n t s , e t c . ) i s
r e q u i r e d t o h a v e i n s t a l l e d e l e c t r i c a l l y p o w e r e d s m o k e
d e t e c t o r s p e r U n i f o r m B u i l d i n g C o d e .
w * * O t h e r F i r e a n d L i f e S a f e t y i t e m s m a y b e r e q u i r e d f o l l o w i n g
f u r t h e r p l a n r e v i e w o r f i e l d i n s p e c t i o n .
S C : n r f
F N 8 9 2 0 1 / T E M P / T X T L I B 6
F N 8 9 2 0 1 / T E M P / T X T L I B 6
FAX ONLY
(707) 255-5021
KAH ASH C. CHAUDHARY, P.E.
Rqi-tcd CivU
Engi—
Pknm
City of Napa
Planning Department
1600 First Street
Napa, CA 94559
Attn: Mr. James C. McCann
Associate Planner
CHAUDHARY & ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Engineers - Surveyors - Planners
July 17, 1989
#89-04-017
VILLA PLAZA
3272 VILLA LANE
NAPA, CALIFORNIA 94558
Telephone (707) 255-2729
JUL 1989
RECEIVED
CITY OF NA
pLANNING
Re: "Packard Estates" °� D
West Side of t
Linda Vista Avenue
Napa, California
A.P. Nos. 7-102-46 & 7-152-25
(2.04 Acres)
Dear Mr- McCann:
Enclosed herewith is the Tentative Map submittal for "Packard Estates", a proposed
in -fill single family detached residential project located on the west side of Linda
Vista Avenue.
Attached are the following items for processing of our submittal, as required by City
of Napa:
1. 40 Blueline Prints of Tentative Map, folded
2. 8z" X 11" Reduction of Tentative Map
3. Project Description
4. Filing Fee is being provided directly by Bud Waddell, representative of
property owner.
5. Land Use Action Application and Environmental Information Form are being
provided directly by Bud Waddell.
6. List of owners of surrounding properties is being supplied directly to you
by Bud Waddell.
We formally request that the requirement of a Soils Report be waived by the Public
Works Director at this time, for the processing of the Tentative Map. This is a
straightforward infill project and a number of Soils Reports for subdivisions in the
surrounding area are available (i.e. Vineyard Subdivision, Tokay Estates, Del Mar
Estates, Linda Vista Meadows, and others). Please defer this requirement until the
Improvement Plans and Final Map stage. This matter has been discussed with Mr. John
W. Lindblad by the undersigned and he has granted this request verbally.
City of Napa Planning Dept. July 17, 1989
Mr. James C. McCann #89-04-017
■ ■
As a courtesy, we are also transmitting 2 advance blueline prints of the Tentative Map
to the Department of Public Works (DPW) and to the Napa Sanitation District (NSD) for
their information only.
Please call me at 255-2729 or owners' representative, Bud Waddell of Park Place
Brokers, at 253-1011 should you need further information or clarification. An
expeditious action by your office will be greatly appreciated by the applicant.
Thank you very much for your assistance and cooperation.
Sincerely,
CHAUDHARY & ASSOCIATES, INC.
A California Corporation
Kailash C. Chaudhary, P.E.
President
KCC:jdl
Enclosure
cc: Bud Waddell w/Project Description and 6 blueiine prints of Tentative Map
I Robert Peterson (DPW) w/2 blueline prints of�Tentative Map
Joan Baker (NSD) w/2 blueline prints of Tentative Map
-2-
City of Napa, California
IlJ1ER-OFFICE NM
T0: CIVIL ENGINEER III, Jahn Draper Date: 8/16/89
FXM: ENGINEERING AIDE, Diane Willson
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE MAP, PACKARD ESTATES
The Water Division has reviewed the Tentative Map for Packard Estates
and will require the following as conditions for approval of this map:
1. Install a fire hydrant at the northeast corner of Lot 1, off of
Linda Vista Avenue.
ks
P/WATER/TXTLIB3
City of Napa, California
INTER -OFFICE MEMO
TO: John Yost, Planning Director Date: 9/22/89
FROM: Graham Lang, Chief Building Inspector
SUBJECT: 89 -201 -SA, Packard Estates
If the Planning Commission should approve this Use Permit, the
following would. be required by the Building Department.
1. Submission and approval of a grading and drainage plan.
2. Submission and approval of working drawings that show compliance
with:
a. Uniform Building Code.
b. Energy Calculations as set forth in Title 24, C.A.C.
c. Uniform Plumbing Code
d. Uniform Mechanical Code.
e. Handicapped Regulations as required by the State
Architects Office
f. Compliance with any other law and/or ordinance in
effect at the time of building permit issuance.
PACKARD/BUILDING/TXTLIBI9� ��
041 /16
�fnt�NAPA COUNTY
TRENT CAVE, R.S.
Director of Environmental Health
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
1195THIRD STREET, ROOM 205 • NAPA, CALIFORNIA 94559-3082
AREA CODE 707/253-4471 ATSS 528-4471
MEMORANDUM
TO: Napa City Planning Dept. - John Yost, Director
FROM: Dept. of Environmental Health - Jill Pahl, R.E.H.S.
SUBJECT: Use Permit Application of Packard Estates
DATE: August 9, 1989
Located at 4103 & 4051 Linda Vista Avenue
APN 07-102-46/07-152-25 FILE # 89 -201 -SA
We have reviewed the above proposal and recommend approval of the
use permit providing the following are included as conditions of
approval:
1. That the proposed development be annexed to the Napa
Sanitation District.
2. That all waste water lines at the proposed development be
connected to Napa Sanitation District.
3. That the proposed parcel be connected to the Napa City
water system.
4. That if any domestic wells are to be destroyed, a well
destruction permit must be obtained from the Napa County
Department of Environmental Management.
JP: SIP
Pack0712.wp50
010
PLACE
BROKERS
E. Scott Brown
Ellen A. Rauch
Jean Macomber
Diane M. Noeggerath
Van Keyes
553 Jefferson Street
Napa, CA 94559
(707) 253-1011
�J
September 21, 1989
City of Napa
Planning Deptartment
1600 First Street
Napa, California 94559
Attention: Eldon Peter
Re: 89 -210 -SA, Packard Estates
Dear Mr. Peter,
•
SEP 190
RECEINED
CSP
PLANNING
6'
,.8�'<9 +
Please accept this letter as our request for a variance
on lot number 8 of 11 feet for the side yard and 8 feet
for front yard. We are also asking for a 8 foot sideyard
variance on lot number 1.
Please consider the following findings required for these
request: (a) A hardship peculiar to the property, not created
by any act of the owner, exists. In this context,
personal, family or financial difficulties, loss
of prospective profits, and neighboring
violations are not hardships justifying a Variance;
(b) The Variance is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of substantial property rights
of the applicant which are possessed by other
properties in the same district and in the same
vicinity; and that a Variance, if granted, would
not constitute a special privilege of the recipient
not enjoyed by his/her neighbors;
(c) The authorization of the Variance will not be of
substantial detriment to adjacent properties, and
will not materially impair the purpose and intent
of this Chapter on the public interest, nor
adversely affect the General Plan; and
(d) The condition or situation of the specific piece of
property for which the Variance is sought is not
so general or recurrent in nature as to make
Page 2
reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation
for such condition or situation.
(e) The Variance and any buildings or structures permitted by the
variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety
and welfare of the community.
Sincerely,
an Blevins
SPARK
--P L A C E September 8, 1989
BROKERS
City of Napa
Planning Department
1600 First Street
Napa, California 94559
E. Scott Brown
Attn: Eldon Peter
Ellen A. Rauch
Jean Macomber
Re: 89 -201 -SA, Packard Estates
vim,' ONI"'"00 r3
rdyN �° wz.SVC 63S Cn
el
v
Diane M. Noeggerath Dear Mr. Peter,
Please accept this letter as our request for a variance
Van Keyes on lot number 8 of 11 feet for side yard and 8 feet for
front yard. We are also asking for a 8 foot sideyard
Linda K. Legg variance on lot number 1.
Sincerly,
dan Blevins
NOTICE,OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF NAPA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NAPA THAT ON THURSDAY
November 2. 1989 , AT THE HOUR OF 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL,
CITY OF NAPA, 955 SCHOOL STREET, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE CONDUCTED BY SAID PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NAPA AT WHICH TIME AND PLACE ALL PERSONS MAY ATTEND AND BE
HEARD UPON THE APPLICATION OF:
89-201-VA(1),VA(2),VA(3),SA, FACMM ESTATES (Blevins-Davidson) - Request
to subdivide a 2.0 acre parcel of land at 4051 and 4103 L inda Vista Avenue
into 9 residential lots ranging in size frac 5,850 to 10,300 square feet at
an overall density of 4.4 units to the acre. The lots will be accessed off
a now public street cul-de-sac. Existing single family dwellings will
r stain on Lots 8 and 9. The following approvals are required: (1) a
Variance (VA -1) to allow a 13 foot encroachment into the required 20 foot
front setback of Lot 9; (2) a Variance (VA -2) to allow an 8 foot
sncr+oachanent into the required 20 foot front setback of Lot 8; (3) a
Variance (VA -3) to allow an 11 foot encroachment into the required 15 foot
side setback of Lot 8; and (4) a Tentative Subdivision Map. The property
is on the west side of Linda Vista Avanue approximately 600 feet north of
Tkower Avenue within the RL-4.5/6:SP84-112, Low Density Residential: Linda
Vista Specific Plan District. (APN 7-102-46 & 7-152-25) (FEP)
The Initial Study and othor environmental ilocumunts are available for public review at the Planning
Department. The public is hereby Invited to submit written comments regafding the environmental
findings and Negative Declatation determination. Such comments may be submitted prior to the
Planning Commission meeting, or during the Commission's hearing.
If you challenge the VA ( 1) (2) (3) , SA in Court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Napa at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Background information concerning this application will be available the Monday before the swetitiq
at 1:00 p,tit:at the_Citf►Q Planning Vcijoi-Erir_nitj J600 P-iist Street; Nip,*;
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF NAPA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPA THAT ON TUESDAY,
December 5, 1989 , AT THE HOUR OF 7:15 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL,
CITY OF NAPA, 955 SCHOOL STREET, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE CONDUCTED BY SAID CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPA AT WHICH TIME AND PLACE ALL PERSONS MAY ATTEND AND BE
HEARD UPON THE APPLICATION OF:
89-201-VA(1) (2) (3), SA, PACKARD ESTATES (Blevins-Davidson) - Request to
subdivide a 2.04 acre parcel of land at 4051 and 4103 Linda -Vista Avenue
into 8 residential lots ranging in size frau 5,850 to 15,500 square feet at
an overall density of 3.9 units to the acre. The lots will be accessed off
a new public street cul-de-sac. Existing single family dwellings will
remain on Lots 1 and 8. The following approvals are required: (1) a
Variance (VA -1) to allow an 8 foot encroachment into the required 15 foot
side setback of Lot 1; (2) a Variance (VA -2) to allow an 8 foot
encroadm ent into the required 20 foot setback of Lot 8; (3) a Variance
(VA -3) to allow an 11 foot encroachment into the required 15 foot side
setback of Lot 8; and (4) a Tentative Subdivision Map. The property is on
the west side of Linda Vista Avenue approximately 600 feet north of Trower
Avenue within the RL-4.5/6:SP84-112, Low Density Residential: Linda Vista
Specific Plan District. (APN 7-102-46 & 7-152-25) (FTP)
If you challenge the VA(1),(2),(3),SA in Court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Napa at, or prior to,
the public hearing.
Background information
meeting at 1: 00 p . i is at
concerning this application is avaiiabie the Monday �befoi`e tie
the City's Planning Department, 1606 Hist Sttoet; Napa: c_
NOTICE.OF PUBLIC HEARING �
CITY OF NAIPA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NAPA THAT ON THURSDAY
October 5,_1989 , AT THE HOUR OF 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL,
CITY OF NAPA, 955 SCHOOL STREET, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE CONDUCTED BY SAID PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NAPA AT WHICH TIME AND PLACE ALL PERSONS MAY ATTEND AND BE
HEARD UPON THE APPLICATION OF:
89-201-VA(1) (2) (3), SA, PA KARD ESTUES (Blevins-Davidson) - Request to
subdivide a 2.04 acre parcel of land at 4051 and 4103 Linda Vista Avenue
into 8 residential lots ranging in size frrrn 5,850 to 15,500 square feet at
an overall density of 3.9 units to the acre. The lots will be accessed off
a new public street cul-de-sac. Existing single family dwellings will
remain, on Lots 1 and 8. The following approvals are required: (1) a
Variance (VA -1) to allow an 8 foot encroachnent into the required 15 foot
side setback of Lot 1; (2) a Variance (VA -2) to allow an 8 foot
enctoaclment into the required 20 foot setback of Lot 8; (3) a Variance
W3) to allow an 11 foot encroachment into the required 15 foot side
setback of Lot 8; and (4) a Tentative Subdivision Map. The property is an
the rest side of Linda Vista Avenue approximately 600 feet north of Trower
Avam within the RTr4.5/6:SP84-112, Low Density Residential: Linda Vista
Specific Plan District. (APN 7-102-46 & 7-152-25) (FEp)
The Initiai Study and other environmental Vocumonts are available for public review at the PIanning
Department. The public is hereby inviter] 1.0 submit written comments regatding the environmental
findings and Negative Declatation determination. Such comments may be submitted prior to the
Planning Commission meeting, or during the Comillission's hearing.
If you challenge the VA(1) (2) (3) , SA in Court, you may be limited to raising only those
Issues you or someone else raised at the fwblic hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Naha at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Background information concerning this apPlication will be available the Monday before the meeting
at �:�dp.tri.at the CiWil Planning bopartniont, 1600 F'.(Cst Stteet, Njpa.
10 CITY OF NAPA NNING COMMUNICATION ..�..
PUBLIC WORKS DEPAMENrEMISSION
l�
22189 Ar.ENDA ITEM # ..�
TO: ASSISTANT PUMM, Eldon Peter
FROM: CIVIL ENGINEER III, John E. Draperpao
DATE: November 1, 1989 (Revised)
SUBJECT: Packard Estates Subdivision Project No.89-201-SA
Location: 4103 and 4051 Linda Vista Ave APN: 7-102-46 & 7-152-25
The Public works Department has reviewed the application for a
Tentative Subdivision Map for Packard Estates.
F NDATION OF DRUAL:
It is the City's policy to require public streets to serve
subdivisions except in special circumstances as outlined in Section 23-142
of the NW and Policy Resolution 22. The Packard Estates subdivision
proposes to serve all lots within its boundary with a public street.
However, the adjoining vacant parcel to the north would be left with no
possibility for development with a public street due to it's narrow width.
It could only be developed with a private street. The City staff has
worked with the applicant to design a public street which would serve the
Packard Estates subdivision and be stubbed to the north (See Figure 1).
This would allow the adjoining property to the north to be developed with a
public cul-de-sac. It would also allow Packard Estates to be developed
with nine lots similar to those shown on the Tentative Map except that one
flag lot would be needed. The applicant has reviewed the alternative
designs and chosen not to use them.
Because the proposed street design precludes the orderly developtment
of the adjoining parcel to the north with a public street, it is
recommended that the application for a tentative subdivision map be denied
The Final Specific Plan and MEIR for the Linda Vista Planning Area 3
evaluated the probable effects of this project and other developments in
the Linda Vista Specific Plan Area and presented wed mitigation
measures. A financing program for those mitigation improvements has been
developed which includes: 1) Development Agreement with Improvement
Payback Fee, 2) Residential Development Fee, and 3) Exactions. All units
constructed in this subdivision, if approved shall be required to pay all
of the special fees associated with the Linda Vista Planning Area.
CDpA MITIGATION MEASURES:
If the project is to be approved, it is recommended that the following
conditions be required to mitigate this projects environmental impacts as
identified in the MEIR for the Linda Vista Planning Area 3.
1. There shall be imposed on each and every unit constructed pursuant to
the authority of this tentative map, the Residential Development Fee
adopted by Resolution 88-54, the Improvement Payback Fee adopted by
Resolution 89-186, the Planning Study Fee adopted by Resolution 88-16
and the Recreation Center Fee adopted by Resolution 89-142. These fees
are in fulfillme*f the mitigation
EIR for the Lindd Vista Specific
adequate on October 27, 1987. The
amount in effect at the time of
except for the Recreation Center B
effect at the time of occupancy.
measures ide*ied by the Master
Planning Area and certified as
amount of the fee shall be in the
issuance of a building permit
e which shall be the amount in
2. Dedication of right-of-way along the project's frontage on Linda Vista
Avenue to 30 feet from the street centerline. This right -of --way is
required for the "Mello Roos", High Priority Improvements. If the
Tentative Map is approved prior to the right-of-way being purchased for
the High Priority Inprovements, the developer shall receive no credit
towards the Linda Vista Improvement Payback Fee for such dedication.
In the event that the right-of-way is purchased for the High Priority
Improvements after Tentative Map approval and prior to this developer
making the dedication, the developer shall pay back that cost to the
Linda Vista Improvement Payback Fee account, with interest, prior to
receiving Final Map Approval.
3. Install drainage facilities in Linda Vista Avenue along the project
frontage. The design shall conform to the design for the Linda Vista
Specific Plan Area. These facilities are proposed to be installed as
part of the Linda Vista Improvement Payback Fee program. However, if
the developer chooses to install them prior to their installation under
the Linda Vista Improvement Payback Fee program, he shall receive no
credit towards that fee for such improvements.
4. Improve Linda Vista Avenue along the project frontage by installing
street paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, drainage
facilities, street light, fire hydrant, sidewalk barricade and street
trees. A portion of these facilites are porposed to be installed as
part of the Linda Vista Inprovement Payback Fee program. However, if
the developer chooses to install them prior to their installation under
the Linda Vista Improvement Payback Fee program, he shall receive no
credit towards that fee for such improvements.
Approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map for this project if granted
shall be subject to the requirements of the Napa Municipal Code and the
Public Works Department which include the following:
1. Conformance with all mitigation measures listed above.
2. Packard Court shall be dedicated as a public street and constructed to
City Standards.
3. Underground all existing overhead utilities in accordance with Section
23-148 of the Napa Municipal Code.
4. All utilities and construction details shown on the Tentative Map are
for conceptual design purposes only. Construction drawings for the on -
and off-site improvements shall be submitted to this department for
review and approval. The drawings will also include the detailed
design for all utilities, grading, paving and drainage and must be
approved by the City Engineer before the approval of the Final Map.
Sl- lot
Cit
SUBD SION INNIPROVII�]T AGREII�NT
cY-)
P01
THIS AGREEMENT, by and between CITY OF NAPA, a municipal
in the County of Napa, State of California, hereinafter called
George I. Blevins, Georgeana Blevins, and Thomas P. McCrea III,
called "Developer."
WITNESSETH:
?
Pr
�GLk.` NPPP
c or `ANG
i
WHEREAS, Developer is in possession of a tract of land lying in the
City of Napa, County of Napa, State of California, known as Packard Estates,
Project # 89-201 SA, hereinafter called "Subdivision" and more particularly
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and
Wim, the Tentative Map of said subdivision was approved with
conditions by the City on December 5, 1989, which conditions are incorporated
herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Final Map of said subdivision has been reviewed by the
City's. Public Works and Planning Directors and found to be in ccupliance with
the approved tentative map; and
WHEREAS, State Subdivision Map Act Govenument Code Section 66410, et.
seq. and Chapter 23 of the Napa Municipal Code, require the execution of this
agreement relating to required improvements prior to the approval by the City
Council of the Final Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises
and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
1. Construction Obligation: Developer agrees at Developer's sole
cost and expense to cause all improvements identified in the conditions to the
approval of Developer's subdivision to be made and campleted to the City's
satisfaction within two (2) years fran the date of this agreement. A copy of
such conditions is on file in the Public Works Department. No extension of
time shall be made except upon the basis of a written application made by
Developer to the Public Works Director stating fully the grounds of the
application and facts relied upon for such an extension. Any extension may be
conditioned upon an increase in security and inspection fees to reflect current
costs and compliance with Napa Municipal Code Sec. 23-176. Neither such
extension nor other delay by City shall constitute a waiver of any of the
obligations of Developer or Developer's surety.
2. Easements and Permits: Developer shall, at Developer's sole
cost and expense: a) provide any and all rights of way and easements which may
be necessary or convenient for said subdivision and its required improvements
b) obtain all necessary permits and licenses for the construction of the
required improvements c) give all necessary notices and d) pay all fees and
taxes required by law.
3. Performance of the Work: Construction shall commence within a
reasonable time. Developer agrees to perform the work of construction of all
improvements for said subdivision in a workmanlike and professional manner, in
accordance with all requirements of State and local law, including the Napa
Municipal Code, Public Works Standard Specifications, or any subsequent
revisions thereof, and according to the plans and specifications approved by
the Public Works Director, prepared by Chaudhary & Associates,entitled
"Improvement Plans for Packard Estates", consisting of two (2) sheets including
any associated grading plan filed in the office of the City's Public Works
Director. Developer agrees that all details and notes shown on the
aforementioned plans shall be made a part of the improvements.
4. Modifications: Developer reserves the right to modify said
plans and specifications as the development progresses should unforeseen
conditions occur, providing written approval is first obtained from the Public
Works Director. City also reserves the right to make or require reasonable
modifications to the plans and specifications whenever field conditions and/or
public safety require such modifications. Developer shall pay the City for all
costs including, without limitation, plan check and inspection costs resulting
from. any such modifications. Developer shall provide personal supervision of
the work on the improvements or have a competent foreman or superintendent on
the work at all times during progress with authority to act for Developer.
5. Compliance and Inspection: All development activity shall be
in compliance with conditions of approval of the subdivision and measures
imposed to mitigate adverse environmental effects of the project including any
monitoring program(s). All improvements shall be inspected by City for
compliance with City standards, plans, specifications, and subdivision
regulations. Concurrent with the execution of this agreement Developer shall
pay to City the sum of $ 2,360 to cover the costs of inspection.
6. Access to Work: Developer shall allow City's duly authorized
representatives access to the work at all times and shall furnish them with
every reasonable facility for ascertaining that the methods, materials, and
workmanship catply with the requirements and intent of the approved plans.
Developer is required to give at least one day's advance notice of the date
upon which work is commenced and the date upon which the work is to be
completed. City may reject defective work and require its repair, replacement,
or removal by Developer, all at no expense to City.
7. Street Lights: Developer agrees to have the street lights
installed and turned on when fifty (50%) percent of the hares on any one block
are occupied. Developer further agrees to pay to City the sum of $5.00 per
street light per month, or portion of a month, for the street light energy
costs until all improvements are accepted for maintenance by the City.
8. Street Trees:
(a) Developer agrees to plant street trees of the designated
species, in accordance with standards and specifications of the City, along all
public streets within the subdivision. The trees shall not be planted until
the lots are developed and the buildings occupied, so that the new property
owners are available to maintain the street trees. If, at the time the
Developer requests acceptance of the subdivision improvements, all, or a
portion, of the lots are undeveloped, the Developer shall deposit with the
City, a minimumof $200.00 for each street tree which is required to be
planted. The deposit will satisfy the Developer's obligation to plant the
street trees and the City will make arrangements to have the trees planted at
OA
"
s u c h t i m e a s t h e l o t s a r e d e v e l o p e d a n d / o r u n i t s o c c u p i e d .
( b ) D e v e l o p e r i s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e m a i n t e n a n c e a n d u p k e e p o f
t h e s t r e e t t r e e s , o t h e r t h a n t h o s e s t r e e t t r e e s C i t y h a s a s s u m e d r e s p o n s i b i l i t y
f o r p l a n t i n g p u r s u a n t t o ( a ) a b o v e , f o r a p e r i o d o f o n e ( 1 ) y e a r a f t e r e a c h
t r e e i s p l a n t e d . T h e D e v e l o p e r s h a l l d e p o s i t w i t h t h e C i t y a m i n i m u m o f
$ 1 0 0 . 0 0 p e r t r e e t o g u a r a n t e e t h a t t h e t r e e s w i l l b e m a i n t a i n e d f o r t h e o n e
y e a r p e r i o d . A l l t r e e s m u s t b e i n a h e a l t h y , g r o w i n g c o n d i t i o n a t t h e e n d o f
t h e o n e y e a r m a i n t e n a n c e p e r i o d o r t h e m a i n t e n a n c e p e r i o d w i l l b e e x t e n d e d a t
t h e d i s c r e t i o n o f t h e P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n D i r e c t o r . U p o n c o m p l e t i o n o f t h e
m a i n t e n a n c e p e r i o d , t h e S t r e e t T r e e M a i n t e n a n c e D e p o s i t s h a l l b e r e t u r n e d t o
t h e D e v e l o p e r .
9 . S t r e e t S w e e p i n g : D e v e l o p e r a g r e e s t o k e e p t h e p u b l i c
r i g h t - o f - w a y c l e a n a n d c l e a r o f b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s o n a l l s t r e e t s w h e r e h o m e s
a r e - o c c u p i e d . I f t h e D e v e l o p e r c o n s t r u c t s t h e s u b d i v i s i o n i n p h a s e s s o t h a t
a l l o f t h e h a r e s i n o n e p h a s e o f t h e s u b d i v i s i o n a r e c o m p l e t e d a n d o c c u p i e d
p r i o r t o t h e r e m a i n d e r o f t h e s u b d i v i s i o n , D e v e l o p e r a g r e e s t o p a y f o r t h e c o s t
o f t h e C i t y s t r e e t s w e e p e r t o s w e e p t h e s t r e e t s i n f r o n t o f t h e c c m p l e t e d h o m e s
u n t i l t h e s u b d i v i s i o n i s a c c e p t e d f o r m a i n t e n a n c e b y t h e C i t y .
1 0 . T r e n c h P a v i n g : D e v e l o p e r a g r e e s t o m a i n t a i n a l l e x c a v a t i o n s i n
e x i s t i n g s t r e e t s i n a s a f e c o n d i t i o n u n t i l t h e p e r m a n e n t p a v i n g i s i n s t a l l e d .
T e m p o r a r y p a v i n g s h a l l b e i n s t a l l e d a t t h e e n d o f e a c h w o r k d a y a n d t h e p a v e d
s t r e e t a r e a k e p t o p e n e d a n d a v a i l a b l e f o r t r a f f i c . E a c h s i d e o f t h e t r e n c h
s h a l l b e c u t t o a n e a t l i n e p r i o r t o t h e p l a c e m e n t o f t h e p e r m a n e n t p a v e m e n t .
I f t h e p e r m a n e n t p a v e m e n t i s n o t i n s t a l l e d w i t h i n t h e t i m e l i m i t s s t a t e d o n t h e
p l a n s , o r a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e E n g i n e e r , D e v e l o p e r a g r e e s t o p a y C i t y t o r e p a v e
t h e t r e n c h , a t t h e r a t e o f $ 4 . 0 0 p e r s q u a r e f o o t .
1 1 . U n d e r g r o u n d i n g o f U t i l i t i e s : D e v e l o p e r a g r e e s t o p l a c e
u n d e r g r o u n d a l l o v e r h e a d u t i l i t y l i n e s w i t h i n t h e b o u n d a r i e s o f t h i s
s u b d i v i s i o n a s s e t f o r t h i n S e c t i o n 2 3 - 1 4 8 o f t h e N a p a M u n i c i p a l C o d e ,
i n c l u d i n g t h e e x i s t i n g o v e r h e a d u t i l i t y l i n e s a l o n g t h e s t r e e t f r o n t a g e s o f t h e
s u b d i v i s i o n .
1 2 . W a t e r F e e s : D e v e l o p e r s h a l l p a y t h e w a t e r c o n n e c t i o n f e e f o r
e a c h w a t e r m e t e r w i t h i n t h e s u b d i v i s i o n p r i o r t o r e c o r d a t i o n o f t h e f i n a l m a p .
D e v e l o p e r s h a l l p a y t h e m e t e r s e t f e e f o r t h e w a t e r m e t e r f o r e v e r y l o t i n t h e
s u b d i v i s i o n p r i o r t o C i t y ' s a c c e p t a n c e o f s u b d i v i s i o n i m p r o v e m e n t s . C i t y w i l l
s e t t h e w a t e r m e t e r s u p o n r e c e i p t o f p a y m e n t . T h e a m o u n t o f t h e c o n n e c t i o n a n d
m e t e r s e t f e e s s h a l l b e t h a t p r e v a i l i n g a t t i m e o f p a y m e n t .
1 3 . C a b l e T e l e v i s i o n : D e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e t r e n c h e s f o r C a b l e
T e l e v i s i o n f a c i l i t i e s a t n o c o s t t o t h e c a b l e f r a n c h i s e .
1 4 . C i t y S e r v i c e s : D e v e l o p e r a g r e e s t o b e f i n a n c i a l l y r e s p o n s i b l e
f o r a l l r e q u i r e d C i t y s e r v i c e s p r o v i d e d t o s u b d i v i s i o n r e s i d e n t s p r i o r t o
a c c e p t a n c e o f i m p r o v e m e n t s b y C i t y .
1 5 . D e v e l o p e r N o t A g e n t o f C i t y : N e i t h e r D e v e l o p e r n o r a n y o f
D e v e l o p e r ' s a g e n t s o r c o n t r a c t o r s a r e o r s h a l l b e c o n s i d e r e d t o b e a g e n t s o f
C i t y i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e p e r f o r m a n c e o f D e v e l o p e r ' s o b l i g a t i o n s u n d e r t h i s
3
"
a g r e e m e n t .
1 6 . D e v e l o p e r R e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r W o r k : U n t i l s u c h t i m e a s t h e
i m p r o v e m e n t s a r e a c c e p t e d b y C i t y , D e v e l o p e r s h a l l b e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r a n d b e a r
t h e r i s k o f l o s s t o a n y o f t h e i m p r o v e m e n t s c o n s t r u c t e d o r i n s t a l l e d . U n t i l
s u c h t i m e a s a l l i m p r o v e m e n t s r e q u i r e d b y t h i s a g r e e m e n t a r e f u l l y c o m p l e t e d ,
p a s s e d f i n a l i n s p e c t i o n a n d , i f t o b e d e d i c a t e d t o t h e C i t y , a r e a n d a c c e p t e d
b y C i t y , D e v e l o p e r w i l l b e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e c a r e , m a i n t e n a n c e o f , a n d a n y
r e p a i r s o r r e c o n s t r u c t i o n t o r e m e d y a n y d a m a g e t o s u c h i m p r o v e m e n t s . C i t y
s h a l l n o t , n o r s h a l l a n y o f f i c e r o r e m p l o y e e t h e r e o f , b e l i a b l e o r r e s p o n s i b l e
f o r a n y a c c i d e n t , l o s s o r d a m a g e , r e g a r d l e s s o f c a u s e , h a p p e n i n g o r o c c u r r i n g
t o t h e w o r k o r i m p r o v e m e n t s s p e c i f i e d i n t h i s a g r e e m e n t p r i o r t o t h e c o m p l e t i o n
a n d a c c e p t a n c e o f t h e w o r k o r i m p r o v e m e n t s . A l l s u c h r i s k s s h a l l b e t h e
r e s p o n s i b i l i t y o f a n d a r e h e r e b y a s s u m e d b y D e v e l o p e r .
1 7 . D e v e l o p e r ' s O b l i g a t i o n t o W a r n P u b l i c : U n t i l f i n a l a c c e p t a n c e
o f t h e i m p r o v e m e n t s , D e v e l o p e r s h a l l g i v e g o o d a n d a d e q u a t e w a r n i n g t o t h e ;
p u b l i c o f e a c h a n d e v e r y p o t e n t i a l l y d a n g e r o u s c o n d i t i o n e x i s t e n t i n s a i d "
i m p r o v e m e n t s , a n d w i l l t a k e a l l r e a s o n a b l e a c t i o n s t o p r o t e c t t h e p u b l i c f r o m
s u c h c o n d i t i o n ( s ) .
1 8 . S a l e o r D i s p o s i t i o n o f S u b d i v i s i o n : D e v e l o p e r i s t h e o w n e r
o f t h e s u b j e c t p r o p e r t y o r o w n e r h a s a l s o e x e c u t e d t h i s a g r e e m e n t t o i n d i c a t e
c o n s e n t t o t h e t e a m s h e r e i n . T h e s a l e o r o t h e r d i s p o s i t i o n o f t h i s p r o p e r t y
w i l l n o t r e l i e v e s u c h p a r t i e s f r o m t h e o b l i g a t i o n s s e t f o r t h h e r e i n . I f t h e
p r o p e r t y o r a n y p o r t i o n o f t h e p r o p e r t y w i t h i n t h e s u b d i v i s i o n i s s o l d t o a n y
o t h e r p e r s o n , t h e D e v e l o p e r m a y r e q u e s t a n o v a t i o n o f t h i s a g r e e m e n t a n d a
s u b s t i t u t i o n o f s e c u r i t y . U p o n a p p r o v a l o f t h e n o v a t i o n a n d s u b s t i t u t i o n o f
s e c u r i t i e s , t h e D e v e l o p e r m a y o b t a i n a r e l e a s e o r r e d u c t i o n o f t h e s e c u r i t i e s
r e q u i r e d b y t h i s a g r e e m e n t . N o t h i n g i n t h e n o v a t i o n s h a l l r e l i e v e t h e
D e v e l o p e r o f t h e o b l i g a t i o n s u n d e r P a r a g r a p h s 3 0 a n d 3 1 f o r t h e w o r k o r
i m p r o v e m e n t s d o n e b y o r o n b e h a l f o f D e v e l o p e r .
1 9 . I m p r o v e m e n t S e c u r i t y : I n o r d e r t o i n s u r e f u l l a n d f a i t h f u l
p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h i s a g r e e m e n t a n d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f t h e
s u b d i v i s i o n M a p A c t a n d l o c a l i m p l e m e n t i n g o r d i n a n c e s , D e v e l o p e r s h a l l f i l e
w i t h t h i s a g r e e m e n t t h e f o l l o w i n g s e c u r i t y i n t h e t y p e a n d a m o u n t s s p e c i f i e d :
( a ) F a i t h f u l p e r f o r m a n c e s e c u r i t y i n t h e s u m o f $ 1 1 8 , 0 0 0 t o
c o v e r a l l c o s t s o f p u b l i c i m p r o v e m e n t s .
( b ) L a b o r a n d m a t e r i a l s s e c u r i t y i n t h e s t u n o f $ 5 9 , 0 0 0 t o
e n s u r e p a y m e n t i n f u l l o f a l l p e r s o n s , f i r m s a n d c o r p o r a t i o n s w h o p e r f o r m l a b o r
o r f u r n i s h m a t e r i a l s f o r w o r k d o n e o n s a i d p u b l i c a n d p r i v a t e i m p r o v e m e n t s .
( c ) F a i t h f u l p e r f o r m a n c e s e c u r i t y i n t h e s u m o f $ 3 4 , 5 0 0 t o
c o v e r t h e c o s t s o f u n d e r g r o u n d i n g o f o v e r h e a d u t i l i t y l i n e s .
S e c u r i t y f o r a n y r e q u i r e d l a n d s c a p i n g a n d i r r i g a t i o n o n
i n d i v i d u a l l o t s s h a l l b e a r r a n g e d p r i o r t o C i t y ' s i s s u a n c e o f a b u i l d i n g
p e r m i t .
2 0 . F o r m o f S e c u r i t y : A l l s e c u r i t y s h a l l b e o f a t y p e s p e c i f i e d i n
G o v e r n m e n t C o d e S e c . 6 6 4 9 9 . ( a ) ( 1 ) , ( 2 ) , o r ( 3 ) , a n d m u s t b e s a t i s f a c t o r y t o
4
and be approved by the City Attorney as to form. Certificates of deposit shall
not be deemed to be satisfactory security unless such certificates provide that
the City is the owner of record of such funds. The City shall be the sole
indemnity named on any instrument required by this agreement. In addition to
the full amount of the security, there shall be included costs and reasonable
expenses and fees including attorney's and expert's fees incurred in enforcing
the obligation secured.
21. Cash Security: Developer shall, upon execution of this
agreement, deposit with City $ 5,000 to be applied at the discretion of City to
correct minor deficiencies that may arise during or after the construction of
the subdivision. Upon notice by City, Developer shall pay sufficient monies to
City to maintain this cash deposit until inspection of all the improvements and
acceptance of public improvement. Any unexpended amount will be returned to
Developer at the time all bonds and securities are released.
22. Acceptance of Improvements: No improvement shall be accepted by
the City unless and until it is free of all liens and encumbrances, and free of
all material defects and conditions which may create a hazard to the public
health, safety, or welfare. Upon completion of final inspection of the
improvements described herein, the Developer shall comply with Section 3093 of
the Civil Code and shall forthwith deliver to the Public Works Director a copy
of the notice of completion required by said section bearing certification of
recordation by the County Recorder. In addition, all properties,
rights -of -ways, easements, and other interests to be dedicated to the City
shall be; before acceptance thereof by the City, free and clear of all liens
and encumbrances of any kind or character whatsoever and free of any and all
material defects and conditions creating a hazard to public health or public
safety.
23. Guarantee and Security: Developer guarantees that all
improvements shall be free from defects of materials or workmanship and shall
perform satisfactorily for a period of at least one (1) year from and after
acceptance of such improvements as complete, and the Developer shall repair any
defects in any such improvements and replace any defective improvements which
cannot be repaired and which occur or arise within said one (1) year period at
Developer's own expense. Should Developer fail to act promptly or in
accordance with this requirement, or should the exigencies of the case require
repairs or replacements to be made before Developer can be notified, City may,
at its option, make the necessary repairs or replacements or contract for the
necessary work and Developer shall pay to City the actual cost of such repairs
as well as all administrative expenses incurred by City. Concurrent with
acceptance of subdivision improvements Developer shall enter into a one-year
maintenance agreement with City and provide security for performance in the sum
of $ 5,900.
24. Exoneration of Surety: City shall not be required to exonerate
any surety, release any security relating to satisfactory completion of the
improvements or issue occupancy permits until acceptance of proposed public
improvements by the City or, in the case of improvements which will not be
dedicated to and accepted by City, until the improvements have passed final
inspection by City. In addition, release of security, exoneration of sureties
and issuance of occupancy permits will be predicated upon the receipt of
required maintenance and/or warranty agreements and security therefor as well
5
0 .
as payment of all outstanding fees and reimbursements due City pursuant to this
agreement.
25. Fees: In addition to the fees for planting and maintenance of
street trees, inspection, and water connection and meter charges set forth
above, Developer shall pay all required fees at the rates in effect at the time
payment is made including without limitation the following types of fees:
(a) Park and Recreation Acquisition and Development
(b) City wide traffic mitigation
(c) Property Development (Excise Tax)
If City has complied with all statutory prerequisites for collection,
said fees shall be paid prior to issuance of a requested building remit;
otherwise, said fees shall be collected on a prorata basis for each unit on the
date of final inspection, or the date the Certificate of Occupancy is issued,
which ever occurs first. Developer shall notify the Public Works Director upon
the opening of any escrow for the sale of the subject property, or any portion
thereof, or interest therein, and shall provide escrow instructions that any
unpaid fees or charges be paid to City from the sale of proceeds in escrow
prior to disbursing proceeds to Seller.
26. Building Pemit Requirements: Prior to issuance of any
building permit, Developer shall comply with all conditions precedent to
issuance, including without limitation, the Uniform Fire Code requirements
relating to access and water supply. Developer shall also pay the applicable
Property Development Excise Tax as well as all required fees.
27. Default of Developer: Default of Developer shall include, but
not be limited to, Developer's failure to timely ccmmence construction under
this agreement; Developer's failure to timely complete construction of the
improvements; Developer's failure to timely cure any defect in the
improvements; Developer's failure to perform substantial construction work for
a period of twenty (20) calendar days after commencement of the work;
Developer's insolvency, appointment of a receiver, or the filing of any
petition in bankruptcy. either voluntary or involuntary which Developer fails to
discharge within thirty (30) days; the commencement of a foreclosure action
against the Developer or a portion thereof, or any conveyance in lieu or in
avoidance of foreclosure; or Developer's failure to perform any other
obligation under this agreement.
28. Remedies in Event of a
default:
Default: In the event of Developer's
(a) City reserves to itself all remedies available to it at law
or in equity. Any remedies specified herein are in addition to and not in lieu
of other remedies available to City. Developer agrees that City has full
discretion in choosing the remedy or remedies to pursue and that the failure of
City to take enforcement action shall not be construed as a waiver of that or
any subsequent default or breach.
A
(b) Developer, the surety and any person, firm, partnership,
entity, corporation, or association claiming any interest in the real property
hereinabove described and each of them shall totally reimburse City for its
entire cost and expense (including attorneys fees and costs) including interest
thereon at the maximum rate allowed by law from the date of notification of
such cost and expense until paid. Such obligation for reimbursement shall be
unlimited by the amount of the estimates set forth or by such security as may
have been provided to City in connection with this agreement. Such amounts and
interest accrued thereon shall constitute a lien on the subject property.
(c) City may enter onto the subject property, take over the work
and prosecute the same to completion by contract or any other method City deems
advisable, and, in such event, City, without liability for so doing, may take
possession of and utilize in completing the work, such materials, appliances,
plant and other property belonging to Developer which may be on the site of the
work and necessary performance of the work.
(d) City may record a Notice of Violation against all lots in
the subdivision, revert the subdivision to acreage and/or withhold or revoke
all building, zoning and occupancy permits.
29. Hold Harmless: The Developer shall be solely responsible and
save City harmless for all matters relating to the payment of Developer
employees and agents, including compliance with social security, withholding
and all other regulations governing such matters.
30. Indemnification: Developer hereby warrants that the design and
construction of required improvements will not adversely affect any portion of
adjacent properties and that all work will be performed in a proper manner and
in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. To the full extent
permitted by law, Developer agrees to indemnify, defend, release and save
harmless City, its officers and employees from and against any and all claims,
suits, liabilities, actions, damages, penalties or causes of actions by any
person including Developer, owner, their employees and agents for (a) any
personal injury, death, or damage to property from any cause whatsoever arising
out of or in connection with this agreement or the actions and obligations
hereunder or approval of Developer's project, and (b) any failure to comply
with all applicable laws and regulations, including, without limitations, any
requirement regarding payment of prevailing wages. This indemnification shall
extend, without limitation, to injuries to persons and damages or taking of
property resulting from the design or construction of the subdivision or its
improvements and to adjacent property owners as a consequence of diversion of
waters or design or construction of public drainage systems, streets or other
public projects. Developer shall so indemnify City regardless of City's
passive negligence, City's approval of plans or City's inspection, approval or
acceptance of the improvements and notwithstanding any limitation on the amount
or type of damages or compensation payable by or for Developer under Workers'
Compensation, disability, or other employee benefit acts, the acceptance of
insurance certificates required under this agreement, or the terms,
applicability, or limitations of any insurance held by Developer. The
provisions of this paragraph shall continue to bind the parties after
acceptance/approval of the works of improvement by City.
h
31. Insurance: Without limiting Developer's indemnification
provided herein, Developer shall take out and maintain at all times during the
life of this agreement up to the date of acceptance of the public improvements
by the City and passage of final inspection of the private improvements,
whichever occurs later, the following policies of insurance with insurers with
a Best rating of no less than "A:XIII":
(a) Workers' Compensation Insurance to cover its employees and
the Developer shall require all contractors and subcontractors similarly to
provide Workers' Compensation Insurance as required by the Labor Code of the
Stats of California for all of the subcontractors' employees. All Workers'
Compensation policies shall be endorsed with the provision that it will not be
cancelled or altered without first giving thirty (30) days prior notice to the
City of Napa by certified or registered mail.
In case any class of employees engaged in hazardous work under
this agreement is not protected under Workers' Compensation statutes, the
Developer shall provide, and shall cause his contractors or subcontractors to
provide adequate and suitable insurance for the protection of its employees not
otherwise protected. Such policy shall provide that it will not be cancelled
or altered without first giving thirty (30) days prior notice to the City by
certified mail.
(b) Public Liability Insurance including personal injury and
property damage insurance for all activities of the Developer and its
contractors and subcontractors arising out of or in connection with this
contract, written on a comprehensive general liability form including, but not
limited to, Broad Fonn Property Damage, blanket contractual, products liability
and ccapleted operations,'X, C, U hazards, vehicle coverage and non -owned auto
liability coverage in an amount no less than $1 million dollars combined single
limit personal injury and property damage for each occurrence. Each such
policy shall be endorsed with the following language:
(1) The City of Napa is named as additional insured for all
liability arising out of the operations by or on behalf of the named insured,
and this policy protects the additional insured, its officers, agents, and
employees against liability for personal and bodily injuries, deaths or
property damage or destruction arising in any respect, directly or indirectly,
in the performance of the contract.
(2) The inclusion of more than one insured shall not operate
to impair the rights of one insured against another insured, and the coverages
afforded shall apply as though separate policies had been issued to each
insured.
(3) The insurance provided is primary and no insurance held
or awned by the City shall be called upon to contribute to a loss.
(4) The coverage provided by this policy shall not be
cancelled, non -renewed, or substantially reduced in amount or scope, without
thirty (30) days prior written notice given to the City by certified mail.
(5) All rights of subrogation are hereby waived against the
0
City, its officers and employees when acting within the scope of their
appointment or enplc mtient.
(c) Certificates of Insurance and properly executed endorsement
in a form acceptable to the City Attorney evidencing the coverage required by
the clauses set forth above shall be filed with the City at the time of
execution of this contract.
32. Attorney's Fees: In the event any part to this agreement brings
an action to enforce or interpret the provisions of this agreement, the
prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover reasc able
attorney's fees from the other party. This provision shall be in addition to
any provisions regarding attorney's fees set forth in the bonds securing this
agreement.
33. Time of Essence: Time is of the essence.
34. Severability: The provisions of this agreement are severable.
If any portion is held invalid by a court of campetent jurisdiction, the
remainder of this agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
35. Entire agreement: This agreement constitutes the entire
agreement with respect to the subject matter and all modifications, amendments
or waivers must be in writing and signed by the authorized representatives of
the parties. In the case of City, the appropriate party shall be the Public
Works Director.
36. Reference: Any reference to a department manager shall include
his or her duly authorized deputy or representative.
37. Recordation: Upon request by City, Developer/owner agree to
execute and acknowledge a memorandum of this agreement for recordation with the
County Recorder. By recordation of this agreement or a memorandum hereof, it
is parties intent to provide notice to future purchasers that the obligations
and benefits set forth shall run with the land. At its option City may record
the agreement or memorandum or may require Developer, at Developer's cost, to
record such agreement or memorandum and may withhold City pPrn+; is until proof
of recordation is provided to City.
38. Special Provisions: This subdivision is in the Linda Vista
Specific Plan Area and development of the property requires payment of fees for
streets, drainage and recreation facilities as required by action of the City
Council.
39. City and Developer agree that the street improvement work on
Linda Vista Avenue is part of the High Priority Improvement work and the cost
of these improvements will be credited toward the required High Priority
Improvement fees. Developer acknowledges and understands that the Planning Fee
and the Recreation Center Fee are required to be paid for the new hcmes in this
development.
a
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer and City have hereunto caused their
hands to be subscribed through their duly authorized officers:
By the Developer this aday of
and by the City this J14 day of -.1i A4 19 qp
CITY OF NAPA, a municipal
corporation
M; WERAIM VA
I "On
•:RTL59 kf �*:u
WIla 1.,#
City
kIp
•• Y�1• C �I�
city MiRtor
PACKARDEST/GENENG/T=B3
10
Mailing Address: 4045 Linda Vista Avenue
Napa, Ca 94558
Bruce K. IrwinMai,rj-- _
By:
'ie M. Irwin
NOTE: (Signatures must be notarized)
0
,,,
The land referred to herein is situated in the State of California, County of Napa,
City of Napa and is described as follows:
A portion Lot 4, as shown on the map entitled, "Map of Subdivision of Wm. M. Fisher
Tract", filed June 11, 1912 in Book 2 of Maps at page 25 in the office of the
County Recorder of said Napa County, described as follows:
COMMENCING on the Southwestern line of said Lot 4, distant thereon South 35° 30'
East 356.40 feet from the most Western corner thereof; running thence South 350 30'
East 117.20 feet; thence North 540 30' East 376.17 feet to the Southwestern line of
Linda Vista;' thence along last mentioned line North 35° West 117.20 feet; thence
South 54° 30' West 376.17 feet to the point of commencement.
AP# 7-152-25
��. P O 4
P U B L I C W O R K S D E P A R T M E N T
��/ I i N O N " 1 6 0 0 F i r s t S t r e e t
1 P O B o x 6 6 0
C I T Y o f N A P A N a p a , C a l i f o r n i a 9 4 5 5 9 - 0 6 6 0
( 7 0 7 ) 2 5 7 - 9 5 2 0
F A X # 7 0 7 . 2 5 7 - 9 5 2 2
S T A N D A R D P R E L D M U G f f P U B L I C W O R K S P U N C H L I S T
P R O J E C T : P A C Y - a 2 D F - - G 1 ' r 2 T - S S D A M : D E : C _ 4 . I G I ��y
1 . P r o v i d e c a t p l e t e g e o t e c h n i c a l r e p o r t i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o , j o b
s u m m a r y , c a n p a c t i o n t e s t s f o r h o u s e p a d s , t r e n c h b a c k f i l l , s t r e e t
s u b g r a d e a n d s t r e e t r o c k g r a d e , a n d s p e c i f i c c e r t i f i c a t i o n o f a l l
b u i l d i n g p a d s t o P u b l i c 1 . 7 o r k s .
C O N F I R I E D B Y : D A T E :
2 . P r o v i d e c c u p l e t e g e o t e c h n i c a l r e p o r t o r p o r t i o n t h e r e o f t h a t r e l a t e s t o
h o u s e p a d c e r t i f i c a t i o n a n d , i f o p t i o n s w e r e g i v e n f o r f o u n d a t i o n
d e s i g n , w h i c h o p t i o n w a s u s e d i n c o n s t r u c t i o n o f p a d s , t o C i t y o f N a p a
B u i l d i n g D e t , 2 5 7 - 9 5 4
C O N F I R M E D B Y : I V A V P , . , , D A T E : C
F
3 . P r o v i d e l e t t e r f r a u C i v i l E n g i n e e r t h a t a l l m o n u m e n t s h a v e b e e n s e t ,
p u n c h e d a n d s t a m p e d .
C O N F I R 2 4 M B Y : D A T E :
4 . P r o v i d e e l e v a t i o n c e r t i f i c a t i o n f r o m C i v i l E n g i n e e r f o r a l l b u i l d i n g
p a d s , i n c l u d i n g f l o o d e l e v a t i o n s , i f r e q u i r e d .
C O N F I R M E D B Y : D A T E :
5 . P r o v i d e N o t i c e o f A c c e p t a n c e f r a u S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a , D e p a r t m e n t o f
F i s h a n d G a m e , f o r a n y r e l a t e d c r e e k b a n k , w e t l a n d s o r r i p a r i a n w o r k .
7 3 2 9 S i l v e r a d o a i l , u n t v i l l e , C A 9 4 4 - 5 5 0 0
C O N F I R M E D B Y : t l A ( f D A T E : I
6 . P r o v i d e N o t i c e o f I n s p e c t i o n a n d A c c e p t a n c e f r o m C o u n t y o f N a p a ,
E n v i r o n m e n t a l H e a l t h D e p a r t m e n t , t h a t a n y w e l l o r s e p t i c t a n k
a b a n d o n m e n t s , o r o t h e r s p e c i f i e d w o r k , h a s b e e n c o l l e t e d . 1 1 9 5 T h i r d
S t r e e t , N a p a , C a 2 5 3 - 4 4 7 1
C O N F I R M E D B Y : D A T E :
7 . C a p l e t e a l l p u n c h l i s t i t e m s f o r N a p a S a n i t a t i o n D i s t r i c t . C o n t a c t
M r . S t a n D e G a r m o , 9 5 0 I m o l a A v e n u e W e s t , N a p a , C a 2 5 8 - 6 0 0 0
C O N F I R M E D B Y : D A T E :
8 . C o m p l e t e a l l p u n c h l i s t i t e m s f o r C i t y o f N a p a , W a t e r D e p a r t m e n t .
C o n t a c t M r . D a n S w a n k o r M s . L i n d a S c o t t , 2 5 7 - 9 5 2 0 e x t . 3 8 6 .
C O N F I R M B Y : D A T E :
9 . I n s t a l l s t r e e t t r e e s p e r C i t y o f N a p a s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , T - 1 , T - 2 , o r
d e p o s i t $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 p e r t r e e w i t h C i t y o f N a p a , P a r k a n d R e c r e a t i o n
D e p a r t m e n t f o r f u t u r e p l a n t i n g . C o n t a c t C i t y o f N a p a , P a r k a n d
R e c r e a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t , 2 5 7 - 9 5 2 9 , f o r n u m b e r , l o c a t i o n , s p e c i e s a n d
i n s p e c t i o n o f t r e e s . - - ' - ` "
C O N F I R M B Y : D A T E :
16
10. Complete any backon landscaping or park improvement requirements and
contact City of Napa, Park and Recreation Department, 257-9529 for
inspection and accePtimce.
CONFIRMED BY:_N4,4 U/ DATE: I Z- 4- U
11. Complete requirements of City of Napa Planning Department and contact
-Ab. , 257-9530 for final inspection.
CONFIRMED BY: DATE:
12. Complete street lighting system and contact Mr. Steve Crego, City of
Napa, Electrical Department, 257-9540 for final inspection and
authorization to energize. ,
CONFIRMED BY: DATE:
13. Complete all signing and striping and other related requirements for
emergency vehicle access. Contact City of Napa, Fire Department,
257-9590, for final inspection.
CONFIRMED BY: DATE:
14. Provide notice from P.G.& E. that all utility work is complete, all
vaults are set to grade and any damaged improvements are repaired.
CONFIRMED BY: DATE:
15. Provide notice from Pacific Bell Telephone that all utility work is
complete, all vaults are set grade and any damaged improvements are
repaired.
CONFIRMED BY: DATE: t -Z- 0
16. Fog seal all pav' g eas.
CONFIRMED BY: tj A k-) -g',�_ DATE: t Z -K - U
17. Permanently pave all trenches. PAT t4 p-perF-S oA-� STA
CONFIRMED BY: DATE:
18. Install hydrant slabs.
CONFIRMED BY: Dom:
19. Repair all broken sidewalk, driveways, curbs and gutters as marked by
the City Inspector.
CONFIRMED BY: DATE:
20. Verify that all sewer laterals and crater services are marked on the
face of curb.
CONFIRMED BY: DATE:
21. Patch and channelize the inside of all drainage structures. Install
all required steps and trash bars.
CONFIRM) BY: -- DATE:
22. Clean and flush storm drain system.
CONFIRMED BY:
23. Raise all utilit va its to ade.
CONFIRMED BY: q
24. Install all barricades and guardrails.
CONFIRMED BY:
25. Complete all signing and striping.
CONFIRMED BY:
26. Backfill and fine grade all planter
sidewalks and driveways.
CONFIRMED BY:
27. Complete all
property line
CONFIRMED BY:
DATE:
DATE: (Z - -� -1-IU
DATE:
DATE:
strips and backfill behind
DATE:
lot grading paying particular attention to cutoff and
swales.
DATE:
28. Verify all cut and fill slopes are no steeper than 2 to 1 and correct
if necessary. /
CONFIRMED BY: IV ZA (JAL,, f DATE: ) -2--- �{ U
29. Clean up all construction debris.
CONFIRMED BY:
DATE:
30. Clean streets, curbs and gutters and sidewalks of all rock, gravel, and
dirt. DO NC T FLUSH INTO Slr)rl4 DRAIN SYSTEM.
CONFIRMED BY: DATE:
31. Provide any necessary as -built brown line drawing and or records of
field changes.
CONFIRMED BY: DATE:
Contact City of Napa, Department of Public Works, Mr. Vern Godwyn,
257-9520, between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. for final inspection and punch
list specific to each project. A majority of the previously listed items
should be campleted prior to requesting a final punch list.
Contact Mr. Richard Bruechert, City Engineer, 257-9520, regarding all
required final documents and fees.
VG/ks
STANDPUPZHCH/GENENG/r,=B3
CITYof MAPA
To: Finance Department
Central Dispatch
Chief Building Inspector
Chief of Electrical Services
Water Department
Police Department
Fire Department
Director of Parks and Recreation
Nara Sanitation District
Napa Unified School District
Pacific Bell
Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Piner's Ambulance
Viacom Cablevision
United States Post Office
DATE: July 25, 1990
FROM: Scott E. Dungan, P.E.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1600 First Street
PO Box 660
Napa, California 94559-0660
(707) 257-9520
FAX (707) 257-9522
SUBJECT: Final Map for Packard Estates, Book 17 Pages 80/82
Project No.: 89-201
The attached Final Map has been approved by the City Council and recorded
by the County Recorder. The lots shown are now legal lots of record. It is
fon.i rded to you for your planning purposes.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact
US.
CJS
PH0EST/GENENG/TXTLIB3
Very truly yours,
John W. Lindblad, P.E.
Public Works Director
i
By: Scott E. Dungan, P.E.
CIVIL ENGINEER III
d1L
P A R K
PLACE
BROKERS October 13, 1989
E. Scott Brown
Ellen A. Rauch
Jean Macomber
Diane M. Noeggerath
Van Keyes
Linda K. Legg
2360 First Street
Napa, CA 94559
(707) 253-1011
City of Napa
Planning Department
1600 First Street
Napa, CA 94559
ATTENTION: Mr. Peters
Planner
Dear Mr. Peters:
OCT 1M
RECEIVED
CITY OF NAPA
PLANNING
I& _ r
RE: "Packard Estates"
West Side of
Linda Vista
Napa, California
A.P. Nos. 7-102-46 & 7-152-25
(2.04 Acres)
Enclosed hewewith is the updated Tenative Map submittal for
"Packard Estates", a proposed in -fill single family detached
residential project located on the west side of Linda Vista
Avenue.
Attached are the following items for processing of our
submittal, as required by the City of Napa:
1. 30 Blueline Prints of tentative Map, folded
2. Project Description
Please call Mr. Chaudhary, 255-2729, or Bud Waddell, 255-8314
should you need further information or clarification. An
expeditious action by your office will be greatly appreciated
by the applicant.
Thank you very much for your cooperation and assistance.
Sincerely,
Bud Waddell
bo
CITY OF NAPA
PUBLIC WOMS DEPAR7NMT
T0: ASSISTANT PLANNER, Eldon Peter
FROM: CIVIL ENGINEER III, John E. Draper, V
DATE: September 26, 1989
SUBJECT: Packard Estates Subdivision Project No.89-201-SA
Location: 4103 and 4051 Linda Vista Ave APN: 7-102-46 & 7-152-25
The Public Works Department has reviewed the application for a
Tentative Subdivision Map for Packard Estates.
vas• i� it► • •: • � a
It is the City's policy to require public streets to serve
subdivisions except in special circumstances as outlined in Section 23-142
of the NMC and Policy Resolution 22. The Packard Estates subdivision
proposes to serve all lots within its boundary with a public street.
However, the adjoining vacant parcel to the north would be left with no
possibility for developnent with a public street due to it's narrow width.
It could only be developed with a private street. The City staff has
worked with the applicant to design a public street which would serve the
Packard Estates subdivision and be stubbed to the north. This would allow
the adjoining property to the north to be developed with a public
cul-de-sac. It would also allow Packard Estates to be developed with eight
lots. The applicant has reviewed the alternative designs and chosen not to
use them.
Because the proposed street design precludes the orderly development
of the adjoining parcel to the north with a public street, it is
recommended that the application for a tentative subdivision map be denied.
DISCUSSION:
The Final Specific Plan and MEIR for the Linda Vista Planning Area 3
evaluated the probable effects of this project and other developments in
the Linda Vista Specific Plan Area and presented recommended mitigation
measures. A financing program for those mitigation improvements has been
developed which includes: 1) Development Agreement with Improvement
Payback Fee, 2) Residential Development Fee, and 3 Exactions. All units
constructed in this subdivision, if approved shall be required to pay all
of the special fees associated with the Linda Vista Planning Area.
MD•. • 1 • tom• 'J�
If the project is to be approved, it is recommended that the following
conditions be required to mitigate this projects environmental impacts as
identified in the MEIR for the Linda Vista Planning Area 3.
1. Dedication of right-of-way along the project's frontage on Linda Vista
Avenue to 30 feet from the street centerline. This right-of-umy is
required for the "Mello Roos", High Priority Improvements. If the
Tentative Map is approved prior to the right-of-way being purchased,
the developer shall receive no credit towards the Linda Vista
Improvement Payback Fee for such dedication. In the event that the
right-of-way is purchased for the High Priority Improvements after
Tentative Map approval and prior to this developer making the
dedication, the developer shall pay back that cost to the Linda Vista
Improvement Payback Fee account, with interest, prior to receiving
Final Map Approval.
2. Install drainage facilities in Linda Vista Avenue along the project
frontage. The design shall conform to the design for the Linda Vista
Specific Plan Area. These facilities will be installed as part of the
Linda Vista Improvement Payback Fee program unless the Packard Estates
project precedes them.
3. Improve Linda Vista Avenue along the project frontage by installing
street paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, drainage
facilities, street light, fire hydrant, sidewalk barricade and street
trees. A portion of these improvements will be installed as part of
the Linda Vista Improvement Payback Fee program unless the Packard
Estates project precedes them.
• •r . �• -�� is •r u r • • •,•
Approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map for this project if granted
shall be subject to the requirements of the Napa Municipal Code and the
Public Works Department which include the following:
1. Conformance with all mitigation measures listed above.
2. Packard Court shall be dedicated as a public street and constructed to
City Standards.
3. Underground all existing overhead utilities in accordance with Section
23-148 of the Napa Municipal Code.
4. All utilities and construction details shown on the Tentative Map are
for conceptual design purposes only. Construction drawings for the on -
and off-site improvements shall be submitted to this department for
review and approval. The drawings will also include the detailed
design for all utilities, grading, paving and drainage and must be
approved by the City Engineer before the approval of the Final Map.
5. A Soils Investigation and Geotechnical Report shall be prepared in
accordance with Section 23-159 of the Napa Municipal Code. They shall
be submitted to the City Engineer for review and determination of
adequacy before approval of the Final Map.
6. Grading, drainage and erosion control plans shall be submitted for
review and approval. The plans shall incorporate all design and
construction criteria specified in the required geotechnical report.
The plans shall be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer as conforming
to their original recommendations. They shall also assume
responsibility for inspection of the work and shall certify to the City
that the work performed
recommendations.
•
is adequate and complies with the
7. Domestic water facilities shall be installed in accordance with Water
Department requirements. See Water Department mew, to the Civil
Engineer III, dated August 16, 1989, for other specific
requirements.
8. Additional soils information may be requested by the Chief Building
Inspector during the plan check of individual house plans.
9. Park and recreation fees and street improvement fees shall be paid.
10. The applicant shall pay an inspection fee for the required on and
offsite improvements.
11. As each new parcel develops, the applicant for a building permit will
be required to pay any fees in effect at the time of the building
permit issuance.
12. To guarantee completion of all improvements, the applicant will be
required to enter into an agreement with the City and provide bonds
prior to approval of the Final Map. The faithful performance bond
shall include the cost of undergrounding overhead utilities.
This is a general list of requirements based on the proposed tentative
map. During the design of the project, the extent of the required
improvements shall be determined by the City Engineer. All improvements
shall be constructed to City Standards.
Conditions imposed pursuant to the recommendations of the Public Works
Department are not within the jurisdiction of the Design Review Ccmnission
or the Planning C nudssion. Any person wishing to question, modify, amend,
dispute or otherwise appeal a Public Works Department condition has the
right to appeal the permit and/or other entitlement to develop, to the City
Council.
cjs
attachment
PACKA;D/TEMP/TXTLIB3
"...Q. 0
ON
CITY of NAPA
Mr. Kailash C. Chaudhary
3272 Villa Lane
Napa, CA 94558
RE: 89 -201 -SA, PACKARD ESTATES
Dear Mr. Chaudhaxy:
40 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1600 First Street
PO Box 660
Napa, California 94559-0660
(707) 257-9530
August 18, 1989
per our telephone conversation on Friday, August 18, 1989, enclosed please
find a copy of an inter -office mono dated August 16, 1989, frau Civil
Engineer III, John Draper.
Sincerely,
^�? A�
F. Eldon Peter
Assistant Planner
FEP : US
Enclosure
cc: Bud Wadell, Park Place Brokers, 2360 First Street, Napa, CA 94559
CITY of NAPA
&gust 16, 1989
Blevins-Davidson
4045 Linda Vista Avenue
Napa, CA 94558
Re: 89 -201 -SA, Packard Estates
Dear Sirs:
Under the requirements of the California
public agencies must inform applicants in
their application within thirty (30) days
letter is to notify you of the follcwirg:
40
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1600 First Street
PO Box 660
Napa, California 94559-0660
(707) 257-9530
Goverment Code Section 65943,
writing regarding the status of
of receipt. Accordingly, this
1. Your application is ccmplete. Processing wrill begin iitnediately in
accordance with City regulations.
2. Your application has been tentatively scheduled for the October 5,
1989 Planning Cannissicn Meeting.
Please ccntact me at (707) 257-9530 if you have any questions regarding
this matter.
Very truly yours,
F. Eldon Peter
Assistant Planner
cc: Tom Davidson, P.O. Box 1453, Sonome, CA 95476
Chaudhary & Associates, 3272 -Villa Lane, Napa, CA 94558
DAVIDS0N/00RRES/=1B2
"I"R �JCAI
1. BLE'VINS, GEORGI�EANA Bt-EVINS, '1110MAS P. McC"REA 111, Fifr4JICE
i"'IC411"I EoR("f
r I -It __
"I'l-i A f 11-If"Y ARE TI-ff ONL-Y
K. IRWIN AND MAR,)(I)RIE M. IRWIN [)0 FiERE".13Y
'I N A L., M A F)
1-1 A VI N (.37 A N Y R E C "IFF -i E L A N T W1 '11-i 11 ,I 11- 1 M Al',","
OF F)AC�KARD ES'I`A'111'�S", CONSISTIN(I'7' OF" 3 x� t1111 ) , N E
wl"'] Wl.,.1,.1:....11
111E MAKING AND RE(.110RDIN(7 OF' !,`;AID MAP AW SLJBDIVI�`310N S I" I
D I S 11 N Co "I IVF:. BORI)ER LJNE; FFI A "I rFi E Y 1^){. F -I f� EB Y IRI`�EVOCABL..Y OFFER F"OR L)EL)ICA1 ION
I I,,:,..ANF) DESIGNA11':11) (,')N SAID
Z N
FOR J B L, I C S-I"'REE"T PURPOSES TF]AT' Ct.:R'J'Al
I'�
MAI�:) A!�1) "' "FjA(".'KAID C'()LJR'T`.
N
IN WI`FNESS Wl-IEREOF, 1"HE 1.)NDERSIGNED FIAS CAI JSED PRE(.;E "1 3 0 ". 13E F. X I J11 U "'I EE)
v D 19 96'!
AY 01"'__
"I
01
B Y
. .. . . ... . ... .
FHOMAS P. McCREA III
6 1 T'Vj N S F OR ('Y� EA 8L.EVIMS'
R J I E M. I R WI N
13 F� L) C E K. IRWIN
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
S'I'Al"E' CJS:.::,(" -A IF ORNIA
COUNTY OF NAI_ A
ON
i 0 R E M E, "T HE UNDE.RSIGNE'11), A NOFARY 11,J13LIC
. . . .. ..... ....... . ........
IN ANE, �'R C:)1 N A 1) A, S TE 0 1
CALJFOF�NIA, FERSONAI-1-Y
APPEAF�ED
(37 E 0 R G F'. I BI.-EVINS,
GEOR( 9'EANA I L-EVINS, THOMAS
P. McCREA III,
BRL)CE K. IRWIN AND
MARJORIE M - IRWIN,
PEJ`�"a. ()NAL.J. �Y KNOWN TO ME
OR PROVEI 'T0
ME ON 11-iE BASIS OF'
SA"FISFAUFORY EVIDENCE
TO BE 1`11E PERSONS WFIO
I'XE.(`1J,J T'E.D "I'l,''IE
W1111IN INSFf'�UMENI'
AND A(
TO M E THA'r 1"HEY EXE("ItYTEE)
TIIE 'S'AME.
CATE OF
F, I I� iAVE HERELJIN'TO SE"'I MY FIANI) ANI SEAL. 'I"IdE [)AY ANI YEAR
IN WITNESS Wt [ERE.(
ABOVE WRIT_F[,:;N-
NOTARY F' U B L"".IC IN AND FOR NAPA COL)NTY,
STA11 OF CALJF'Of,�NIA
OMMISSI,O
MY
F"XI"IRE S
f I -PR K- 0 l'i 1111'Fli BOARD OF" s"`_'1.J1�)',.J I 0
ANI) ASSESSEMEN'T
I CERTIFY "I"FlA"'I SE(`.L)RI'TY IN THE AMOUN"T' OF BEEN FIt.,E1
WITI-I FfifCLERK OF" THE BOARD OF" ',"3LJI:JERV1S(,)R1") ",ro Gi.,,j ARAN "ITT llffPAYMf, NT
("W" ALL, "I"AYI",��,",`,",� AND A.","')SESSMEN-TS COL.L.ECTED AS "FAXES, WI-11CF-I ARE' NOW A I.-IEN
11,1� (11) f1l) f I I, ";� "", 1"' ARE NOJ` YE"r PAYABLJE.
1��' I'll :'T0'Y IN 1 -HE WITHIN SLJ13UVISION, BU
.2
TIE BOA�"11'11) 01"' ff"ERVISOR"
0 1 v I Z)
IA` FE OF' CALIFORNIA
C'O LJ N 1"Y 0 F N A P A, 'z)
.... . ......
13Y I)EPt,J'T'Y
(IPY AIMPFOR S cF`,1.'1V',1..P 1C.A."ll."Fl,
I FiEREHY
CER'TIFY
"I"FiAT' AC(I"ORDING
'TO 'I"IdE RECORL)""') 01"" MY
OFFI("E', 1-FIE"J" �E Af'�E N(")
LIENS F'OR
tJNPAID
STAlf., COUN"TY, MLJNICI1")AI,_, OR L0(1'.'AL, TAXEG,;
OR SPECIAL.. ASr3ESSME.N'T'S
SAID MAP
('o I'll)
A1�3' 'TAXE!�.,; (EXCE ' F)"T TAXES
OR Si"fl,",14. ASSE�`;�,')'MF'N NUT
YE"I' F)AYAHL.E)
A(7�AIN.-3f
NY J-
A Irl'') A F�
( -
A'" "IfiE
L AND INC"LUDED
IN 1f IF.. WITHIN SUf,:,3E)I VISION.
'OF' IFF C",..1 D,.
CATE OF
,'A 1.11 . I F" (1) F) N I A
SITIA"I"IE ( 0` (",,A
LIF 0,R,N,,[,,A,,
0- MAPS A 'T A41rd
A T*E: /A .... ..... ... .. .
SERIAL, NO.
�
ISI
�FFY OF
AUDI C
NAI A
STA-I"E'.
OF' C/ A L, I F 0 R N I A
C Ot f'N'f"1.`Y v1`AX 101 LECr1`OR ) S AND REJ")1'F'`[)'F1ON
o 1.111111111
I
ISE E» CERTIF'Y 'TFIA F AC(ORDING' -FO it -JE RE_CORD(":') OF MY OFFi(.'f, T111"I"'E ARE N 0
LJEN�,,; FOR LJNFIAID S"I"Al"E, C()LJN'f*Y, MUNICIPAL., ()R, L.00AL "I"'AXE.-I.S OR SPECIAL ASSES�S)MENFS
IDAYAl".31.1) A("AIN
IOLLEC'11'111') A)` "I'AXES (f'_.XCEF)'F TAXE�,; OR SPECIAL. A�,` EN"I'S NOT YET -
A N Y P A RT' OF '11-11E LANT) IN(1"�'I_.UDED IN 111E. WFFIIN Stfflf)l VISION.
..... .... . I ... .. ...... . ..
D AT'E:
'TAY (_"(,)I_,.LEC1'0R, COUN-I"Y OF ' NAPA
SfAll OF" CAt,_If0RNIA
. .... .... .
un o
mm
BY D E F) tJ "I""Y
ID"i ` I ,
LANNINCI COMMISSION'S
_111A"I" "IT-iE, NAFA CI FY FIL-ANNING (..'OMMISSION HAS AFTR(,)VED "I"11 -1E
I HEREBY CEF)"FIF"Y
'FEN "I'A I I VE MAP OF 1-1-1E SUBDIVISION UPON W[11CF-I _11-11S FINAL. MAI IS I,3At,',-'&A)
I d 9
CSA "Ff'
!",J- I E 'TA R Y 01' IT, II.. PL.ANNIN(3 C 0 M M 10 N
I Ty f- N A F` A )"I'All' OF (�ALJF'ORNIA
REG ISTERED CIVII, ENGJNI�A ER S Srf'A.`PEMF",N`.'f'
1, KAILASH C. ALA:)Ad AR Y, Id E'JE1*1:3 Y CERJIFY "I'TiAT 1-1,11 WN ON 111 M A F)
EN "I ITI.,..ED "FINAL MAP OF" PACKARD ESTA IS BASEL) (")N A xl.eJRVEY -Of- "I"! 1f.
MADI'1_ 13Y ME OR tJNDER MY DIREC'TION DURING THE MONTI-i OF AI` RIL, 1989, AND ON '111E
-IOMAS P. McCIREA 111, BRUCE I.
0 R D ER (1) F" ('7E' (,') I )GE 1. Bt.-EVINS, G'NEOI`�(`EANA 13L.EVINS, 11"
I [� WI N ANI:) MAI`�JORIE M. IRWIN, TFIE OWNERS; _11--1Al" "I"IdE 11';(JRVf'.;Y IE") '"FRUE AND (10MI"t-E, rl",
AS SF1(')WN; THAT TF -IE MONUMEN FS WILL BE' OF'' 'THEE NA I't.)RE SFIOWN AND WILI... BE SE"T' IN
TT, I f.' LOCA f'ION SHOWN ON OR f3f.F'('RE DECF.'MBf`__R, 199(, AND WILA_ BE SLJFFI(IEN_I TO
E'NABLE. THE SURVEY "1"0 BE,", I'�E'TRA(.ED.
CI-iA1,JDIIARY & ASSOCIATES, INC., CIVIL ENGME.ERS
r), . 2, 1 __ ",
41,1 i4""A1=,u`7
$,, a 10 .. ... .....
oP
il
A,
0" pmlM
0" , . .... . .. . .. .
A,e At I NJ, " ,
�)� J
"mot
4' d0p
I HEREBY Ef"(11 FY "I I IA'T' I 1,�AVE (","'XAMINF�"..'D "I'l IF' MAF) "FINAL MAP 01' 1"A(�KARD
ES"IAl"I'F1,1AT SAIF SI_j8t'IVISI(`)N S1U"FAN1IAJ LY AS 11' Al"'I 1Ald" )N I-itTEN"I"ATIVE
""
MAI AND ANY APPROVEF) "I"111 �J`�EOF, "I'llAl' A1.1- "THE", 01 I"FIE"
S( JBIDIVISION MAI"' A("�`T (""'311"I'l I IONS OF 11 IE G0Vf'1".RNMEN'F COt")E A,"') BY T1 I E
GOVERNOR, SET)"I"EMBER 27, '1974, AND AM[1',`NDME'N`T*S 11 iEF�E_170, AN[) AL.I... LOCAL 0RDINAN(J`.S`
-E N "I"A 1_1 VE MAF1 HAVE BEEN C( MFLIED
APPLICA1:31-1 AT "I"HE TIME OF AF)I')I,(`)VAI._ Of"' "ITIE 1
WI 11i; AND -1 FIA"I" THE SAME
1,1A
s11'___t 9_4
.. . ..... .. ... . .
DATE:
J01 -IN W. 1. 1 N D 13 1.- A1":
I Y E N GN I N EE R, C I 'TY 01"11 -NAPA 1"� C'. E'. 11618
'1 A "FE C")I,. C A I... I FO R N I A
.. ( , .31 9 2
Rf ",("")I S �A FI()N EXT)If�ES: 12
x
MAYO R AND K) S 1`� IF
J."t e voep c
S,0",LM,,, MAYOR AND--GHAA114 "Ill'IlT,ill(I"",,),A,II ,,D,,,O-Fl",��-111,1."),Illk""i'l�I.",G��'l""(��,,�),��,,��"",,.("I)f ... . . . . ... . N,1AF),,A...
[)4&�T AND F)AMY1 A H[_'ANS, CM(,,,, CI'J`Y CI_E��'.RK, F`()R, _11 -JE ('TTY OF" NAPA, STA"IT'', OF
CALIFORNIA, DO HE RERY CEIRTIF 'Y TFIAT ON "FI-Iff f,+wa..DAY OF'�,,,&J Q,_ 1[11- MAI")
TES" WAS 1w.-11,11) W11"'Id '11-1E (FFY ("Ot.)NCII. F'Of� FUN JLAR
E.NTITLED "FINA1. MAF) Of," F)A(`XARD ESfA
SAID ("OLU"'IL APPI OVEI' SAII) MAP
MEE'FING' 1-1ELD ON 1 HE DAY OF
AND ACCEF"FED ON Bf':'11AI_F ()F- "ITIE '1-0 IMI1)R()VEM[`,`N'T, "I"FIAT' CER'"I"'AIN PAR('�*Et.
0[` L.AND DE')`IGNATEF) ON tZ-All".") MAP A,z,3 "I"A( )KAI' D COI, J R "Fy
IN WI_fNF1�,.,iS
WI-JEREOF", �IAVF'
FIE"f I'"UN"I I "I" OUR FIAND AND
TU1
AFFIXE,T) "FFIE' SEAL OF
THE CI FY OF'
..... .. ....
NAF A -1 1- 1 2 ... . .........
DAY OF . ..... ... ,
i �) �) "I. .
I DEFTFIAT
SAID MAP
ECTS WITH 111f`: f") f'' 0 VI S 10 N S 0
C("iVIPL.IE -,3 IN ALL. FEA OF' 1AF)"FER
(370 OF- 11-] E
STA'I1JTF.S
j" 01 1
.. . ..... ...
TF -I E R E TO
MAYOR AN,I,'),,
("HAIRMAN-', Of' 111E ''BOARD'
CL.ER CITY
('.k NAFIA
'OF' IFF C",..1 D,.
CATE OF
,'A 1.11 . I F" (1) F) N I A
SITIA"I"IE ( 0` (",,A
LIF 0,R,N,,[,,A,,
0- MAPS A 'T A41rd
Clp"f�f I
/
TAIL.", MAP ENTIT'LE"t), "FINAI.-
MAI) OF PA(KARD E�;'T'Al US" IS 110'�EBY ACCE!"' )f 11
... 000 e ol
SF1110WING% A CL.EAFI'�
1,gjo'
AS LE"I I'E'R OF' MADE- HY . . . .. . . .. . miff
"M
�44
AN [) A F�T11 E S A M
011;t,ei� I*ER EXAPNING
'�"
I DEFTFIAT
SAID MAP
ECTS WITH 111f`: f") f'' 0 VI S 10 N S 0
C("iVIPL.IE -,3 IN ALL. FEA OF' 1AF)"FER
(370 OF- 11-] E
STA'I1JTF.S
01 1937, AND S'LJEff)IVISI(N REGULATI(I)NS AL.")C)"CED PI, JIRSL)ANT
TF -I E R E TO
F1 Lf' A'T THE
REQI,JEz3
A 1" M I N LJ "I _ES
-1 ...... . ...
P A O'CI.O( 1K 0 N "I'l . I �";, _111�1 1"'AY 0F`,__m.f1d
RE -CORI )Ef`� OF "IT -1E (3 0 I. N "FY Of" NK ill-'A"I"i"' ("N" C%AL.IF01,�NIA,
IN 1"FiE 01"I"UJ "N"' THE C()I,,JN-fY
"
IN 1300K NO.
0- MAPS A 'T A41rd
SERIAL, NO.
Ffl"�J a r 4"
1 '0/'0, 000
ti
60110
OP
2_2
N IY RECORDER COIJ N TY R E C 0 R D E R, C 0 t .J N 'TY Of" NAPA
ORNI
COUN't"Y 01"' NAIIA STI"E
A"" F ( " A
"At -IF
FA I-
I.'_' () I" C*ALIFORNIA
M A P N
f,`J INC' A SURDI VISION OF' 1656 OR 287 AND 4.417 OR 267 N.CI.R.
Al", S( BEING A PORTION 01" LO"F 4 OF' "THE S1,,J9DIVI!.)I0N OF' WILLIAM
1:19-11"R TRACT OF' REC(1*11) IN BOOK 2 OF' MAPS Al FIA(1110[, 25, N.C.R.
Engineers 0 'a,�')"t'trveyors o 1,11war.lers
3272 VLJJAA LANE
NAPA, CALTIPORNIA 944550
Telephone: ('107) 255--2729 SHIET. T OF' 3
. a,,^>
r
fi
,
r
, r s
H_
s
r.
hr,
ry
ii ,
.
,
,
V
RUSTESt S CERTIFICATE
(;'OLDEN F.N WSi FINANCIAL CORPORATION,A DELAWARE CORPORATION, A�It
S
IEFI1N
FFTHAT CERTAINiAIN
DEED OF TRUST' RECORDED. ..... ,,..IN1
t
�.M:.... ". "�.:� "..::..._" C I SF
ICC AT �
NAPA FA � FJ
N Y RECORDS, DOES IiEREBY
CONSENT
AND JOIN
IN THE „ EXECU SIC) OF .. FOREGOING C✓ C � RECORDATION F DAiI"N C)
^
FTFIF.. FINAL.
MAI
CSF "PACKARD ESTATES ANDJCIN IN ALL OFFERS
F DEDICATION.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF', I FA .A) ) MY `CF
.HEREON `�.J
FC
� � �I I I ,"
D A Y 0
m ,
r
7
C' } LDEN WEST' FINANCIAL CORPORATION
^
Y ..
a
Po
C N,C) I
A W.�I� F.IGEMEN T
STATE OF CALIFORNIA NIA
C✓ O U N *Y CSF NA
t^,,
C N ,. BEFORE F� I.�. M F. �I~ J E:�. U N C7 F.:F� a:.�lC)N ....)
„"..�.„.m"......���, � I., ,� NCS FAI�Y I �.JE.31.,IC✓
IN ANIS F° C J.. ) i
,.
�' �� w � C l� NAY CSF IA�"A ���I�, il... CJF C�✓d�I..11� C�F�NIA F ,, I' �„>C)
p
C
KN AWN TO MIS OR PROVEN �N rO ME ON IWHE BASIS OF SA JISF
ACS I`OR `( I.... VI I.) EN CE 1-0 BE THE
PERSONS WI~ CJ EXECUTED �I FXF: C� TD ” THE WITHIN IN TRtMSN � AS �FF
CORPORATION A I C
"FHE C
F�I
F� �" N iHAT EXECUTED
THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT
IN
ANISAK r
C., N C)
WI -E C.. Cup F ......) � 1 0 - M
THAT H CC) CJF„PATI C
F N EXECUTED
THE WITHIN IN TIC.JM FN !a
1,
1
ANS CITS
Y L„wAW
ORA F� E.. Lr1 .)N OF 11-S F OAFSF) OF DIRECTORS.
N WITNESS WHEREOF, IV uJ;
IHAVE � F.N I� C.
F�1
NSC SE
MY HANDI.) .�
AN F
DAY
Y 1 YEAR
ABOVE WRITTEN.
m
i
f
t
N 1
C� TY PUB[ I C .�� C .'
Y
A
„
x
u�
MY COMMISSION
NMI
FINAL MAP
,
n
,
O
PACKAND ESTATES
I Y}CITY OF NAPA,
YNR..
,
I
Fi ” N C -q
SUBDIVISION
N %F
1656
)
AND 44
7 OR 267
N
atR
ALSO .B�INCOF”A Cr`iCN C� L,Ci�CF iF1. SUBDIVISIONWIILIA
:i. TRACT F RECORD IN BOOK 2 SF MAP.ATASF25.
N. C .IR.
^
t
INC.
LOngineers Surveyors
Planners
3272 VIIXA ,
NAPA, CATIFORNIA 94558
Telephone: (707) 25b--2729
4 X11
t
Oil
R--1 FINAL MAP OF THE VINEYARD --MAP No. 2090, BOOK 9 OF MAI`,""")
PACE
100, N.C*.R.
DATA
NO.
R--2 MAI"
No. ,x.666I',7 OF
PARCEL
MAPS, PAGE 19, N.C.R.
R 3 MAP
No. 24 -08 --HOOK 5 Of"
PARC EI
MAPS, PAGE 43, N.C.R.
R 4 FINAL
MAF"' OF TR0WE.R---LINDA VIS"I A
I-1OMES---MAf,` No. 3723,
BOOK
14- OF MAPS, PAGE"' 21,
N-C-I`�-
40.56'
a
SCA141": I"'
Brass F:) in
Ls 3137
N 54*22'20" E 366.17' (Per R--2)
/T
N cra 'I'a g
(I')er
WARD RYDER REALTY
. . ..... 1113 OR 4,34
30' 20'
Noil & Tog,
RCE 6250
Z
0 e9
ll
M I andw of 6�1
(xi THOMAS B. & MARY:. TE Ar 00
507 OR 23
'566.17
(jJ
70.00,—
CK)C)
(D 1- -11t
- 10
11",Kf
C)
c')
Zj C/1K)
(S.5 tj
3
Ile)
cz-) tJ
c)
c 58.82' 9' (,),,f)ACKAR1-) COURT Z5 c�)
-)
ZP4 41 VU N Z),% ) 0 0 L) t.
Cy, 0
c:)
-77
60.0(1 77, . 1
rr
�Jj
(D11-11, r- U)
(0 5 -64
IN (6
4
N Cq . n '11040
C) 30 2
cq a r)
V,
ria cap Lo t"')
if) n W
ff) ul
0 0' 60,00
30' 20'
N5 4*214'1 E (E) 15- S E W ER 366.17 c+1
R("'E 21764- LanIs ol & STORM [)RAIN
W
EUNICE EASEMEN'T, TYPE "A-
(er [,�-4)
FRIDOIFS (Per R 4) 6
1428 OR 578 Lands of
G11.0R(,E 1. & GEORGEANA BLEMNS
1397 OR 913 V)
RCE 17552
(P er R - -3)
TItOWER AV'fA'N1,JE
R.R. '3pike
(I)er R--3)
*T1.1— 8 a r,
RCE 17552
(Per R--.3)
f,-3A!',,r;IS OF 13EAfdNGS. T1 IF MONUMEN"I"ED CEN,am,-INE Of I-INDA MJA
A VE" N t J (", ("i E A R I N (4 S �'35'30*00" 1,11 A,`-`; �,',HOWN i�,,,')N R . .. .... 2.
OWN,
'0 01'
COURSE/CURVE
DATA
NO.
RADIUS
BEARING OR
LEN G rii
AND "I"AG R.C.E. 24157 UNI. -ESS OTI-iE.RWISE
A (DELTA)
0
S11 ANDARD WELL TYPE S"I"REET MONUMEN"I"
N54"30'00"E'
20.80'
CEN"I"EIRLINE
go,
25'49'17"
40.56'
0-D
90'
8*13'35"
12.92'
IRON PIFIE MONUMENT
r4 0,
154"02','"52"
53.48'
CURVE NUMBER
50'
CENTRAL. AN(.L.E OF ARC
66.85'
50'
.... . ......
46'49'42"
40.m,
50'
6 2 *10'01
54.25'
50'
62*2.9'138"
54.54'
50'
24805'44"
216.50'
0�0
90'
2,3*40'40"
37.19'
90'
10'22'12"
16.129'
12
90'
3402'52"
53.48'
25'
90*00'oo"
39.27'
25'
90100,00"
'39.27'
a
SCA141": I"'
Brass F:) in
Ls 3137
N 54*22'20" E 366.17' (Per R--2)
/T
N cra 'I'a g
(I')er
WARD RYDER REALTY
. . ..... 1113 OR 4,34
30' 20'
Noil & Tog,
RCE 6250
Z
0 e9
ll
M I andw of 6�1
(xi THOMAS B. & MARY:. TE Ar 00
507 OR 23
'566.17
(jJ
70.00,—
CK)C)
(D 1- -11t
- 10
11",Kf
C)
c')
Zj C/1K)
(S.5 tj
3
Ile)
cz-) tJ
c)
c 58.82' 9' (,),,f)ACKAR1-) COURT Z5 c�)
-)
ZP4 41 VU N Z),% ) 0 0 L) t.
Cy, 0
c:)
-77
60.0(1 77, . 1
rr
�Jj
(D11-11, r- U)
(0 5 -64
IN (6
4
N Cq . n '11040
C) 30 2
cq a r)
V,
ria cap Lo t"')
if) n W
ff) ul
0 0' 60,00
30' 20'
N5 4*214'1 E (E) 15- S E W ER 366.17 c+1
R("'E 21764- LanIs ol & STORM [)RAIN
W
EUNICE EASEMEN'T, TYPE "A-
(er [,�-4)
FRIDOIFS (Per R 4) 6
1428 OR 578 Lands of
G11.0R(,E 1. & GEORGEANA BLEMNS
1397 OR 913 V)
RCE 17552
(P er R - -3)
TItOWER AV'fA'N1,JE
R.R. '3pike
(I)er R--3)
*T1.1— 8 a r,
RCE 17552
(Per R--.3)
f,-3A!',,r;IS OF 13EAfdNGS. T1 IF MONUMEN"I"ED CEN,am,-INE Of I-INDA MJA
A VE" N t J (", ("i E A R I N (4 S �'35'30*00" 1,11 A,`-`; �,',HOWN i�,,,')N R . .. .... 2.
OWN,
'0 01'
MAP NO.
IXGEND
EXIS'T'ING MONUMEN]" FOUNI.) --- AS DESCRIBED
0
MONUMEN'I" SE"r -. 1-3/4" IRON PIPE MONUMEN'T'
AND "I"AG R.C.E. 24157 UNI. -ESS OTI-iE.RWISE
NOJET,)
0
S11 ANDARD WELL TYPE S"I"REET MONUMEN"I"
TO TlE SET R.C.E. 24157
CEN"I"EIRLINE
O;R.
OFFICIAL, RECORDS
(E)
N.C.R.
NAf:)A ("Ol )N1Y RECORDS
1. P.
IRON PIFIE MONUMENT
2
DENaus 1-01' NLJMBER
CURVE NUMBER
A (II)EI-J'A)
CENTRAL. AN(.L.E OF ARC
MAP NO.