Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
01.17.2023 City Council Meeting Packet
Posted 1/13/2022 Page 1 of 1 AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 17, 2023 7:00 P.M. Medina City Hall 2052 County Road 24 I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. MOTION TO DELEGATE DUTIES TO PRESIDE OVER THE MEETING TO COUNCIL MEMBER ALBERS IV. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of the January 3, 2023, Work Session Meeting B. Minutes of the January 3, 2023, Regular City Council Meeting VI. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Purchase Agreement for Butterfly Marsh Wetland Banking Credits B. Approve Resolution for Willow Drive Lift Station Quote for Electrical Panel Equipment C. Approve 2023 Goals D. Accept Donation from Doboszenski & Sons Inc. E. Accept Donation from Steve Lundell F. Approve Amendment to Special Assessment Policy VII. COMMENTS A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda B. Park Commission C. Planning Commission VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Loram and Scannell Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review B. Medina Ventures – Medina Park and Boardwalk – 1472 Hwy 55 - PUD General Plan; Pre-Plat C. Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report D. Pioneer Highlands Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District - Public Hearing IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS XI. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS XII. ADJOURN Meeting Rules of Conduct to Address the City Council: • Fill out & turn in comment card • Give name and address • Indicate if representing a group • Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes Mayor Kathleen Martin will participate in the meeting virtually from Sonoma Valley Regional Library located at 755 W Napa Street, Sonoma CA, 95476. MEMORANDUM TO: Medina Mayor and City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: January 12, 2023 DATE OF MEETING: January 17, 2023 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report VI. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Purchase Agreement for Butterfly Marsh Wetland Banking Credits – Attached is the agreement to purchase wetland credits for the 2023 Hackamore Road Project. Staff recommends approval. See attached purchase agreement. B. Approve Willow Drive Lift Station Quotes for Electrical Panel Equipment – City Engineer Jim Stremel is recommending that Medina move forward with the purchase of the electrical panel for the 2023 Willow Drive lift station project. This ensures Medina will have the necessary electrical panel for the project and the project is not delayed due to supply chain issues. Staff recommends approval. See attached memo, quotes, and resolution. C. Approve 2023 Goals – City Council and Staff held our 2023 Goals Work Session on January 3, 2023. Staff has updated the goals based on the direction from the City Council at the meeting. Staff recommends approval. See attached 2023 Goals. D. Accept Donation from Doboszenski & Sons Inc. - Staff recommends approval of the resolution accepting the donation from Doboszenski & Sons Inc. See attached letter and resolution. E. Accept Donation from Steve Lundell - Staff recommends approval of the resolution accepting the donation from Steve Lundell. See attached letter and resolution. F. Approve Amendment to Special Assessment Policy - Staff has been preparing for various street improvement projects during 2023 and beginning to prepare assessment rolls. While conducting this work, staff determined that it would be advisable to build flexibility into the Assessment Policy for projects which include lots of varying intensity or of different use. Staff also suggests clarifying language related to how limited curb 2 and gutter replacement is incorporated into an overall project. The proposed amendments are on pages 10 and 11 of the attached Policy. See attached amended policy. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Loram and Scannell Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review – Scannell Properties and Loram have requested land use approval for development of approximately 396,000 square feet of warehouse/office space located east of Arrowhead Drive, south of Highway 55. Loram proposes to occupy the building on Lot 2 (Bl 1) for warehousing, replacing storage at other sites. The other buildings would be available for lease and managed by Scannell. The applicant has indicated that they were hopeful that vendors and businesses related to Loram may move into some of these spaces. The applicant has indicated that they intend to construct the buildings on Lots 1 and 2 (Block 1) during 2023. Timing of construction on Lot 3 would depend on the market. The following applications have been requested to implement the proposed construction:1) Preliminary plat for subdivision of four lots. 2) Site Plan Review for new construction. 3) Conditional Use Permit for Warehouse use and Outside Storage on Lot 2. Potential Motion: Motion to direct staff to prepare resolutions granting preliminary plat, site plan review, and conditional use permit approval, subject to the conditions noted in the staff report [with changes directed by City Council, if any]. B. Medina Ventures – Medina Park and Boardwalk – 1472 Hwy 55 – Medina Ventures has approval of a PUD General Plan and preliminary plat for a development including commercial uses and four townhome units located along Meander Road east of Arrowhead Drive, west of Fields of Medina West. The applicant has provided updated architectural plans showing how they propose to incorporate the lodging space above the event venue. The applicant proposes to construct two stories of lodging above the middle of the event venue, proposed to accommodate 14 lodging suites with a total of 19 rooms (5 suites are proposed to include a 2nd bedroom). The applicant has also updated the design of the twinhomes because of the intention to use as dwellings rather than lodging. Because of the proposed changes, the updated architectural information is attached for review by the City Council and is summarized in the report. Potential Motions: 1) Move to adopt the ordinance establishing a planned unit development district for Meander Park and Boardwalk and amending the official zoning map 2) Move to adopt the resolution authorizing publication by title and summary 3) Move to adopt the resolution granting preliminary plat and PUD general plan approval for Meander Park and Boardwalk 3 C. Clydesdale Trail Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report – On December 6, 2022 the City Council adopted a resolution authorizing the preparation of an engineering feasibility report for the proposed Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project. The project was initiated as a part of the City’s capital improvement planning and is intended to replace deteriorating infrastructure that includes the existing roadway surface. The proposed project consists of a pavement mill/overlay of the pavement surface along Clydesdale Trail from roughly 100 feet east of the City’s public works driveway to the intersection at County Road 101. There are also sections of the existing concrete curb, spot bituminous trail repairs, the replacement of a section of bituminous trail along CR 101, and pedestrian curb ramps that would be replaced with the project. The total estimated project cost is $518,000 which includes a 10% contingency factor and 20% indirect costs for legal, engineering, administrative, and financing. The next step is for the City Council to consider the enclosed resolution to receive the feasibility report and order the plans and specifications. City staff is recommending that the City also consider approval of the benefit appraisal for the project. Potential Motions: 1. Motion to approve WSB's proposal for final design. 2. Motion to adopt the resolution receiving the feasibility report and ordering the preparation of plans and specifications. 3. Motion to authorize completion of benefit appraisal for the project at staff's discretion. D. Pioneer Highlands Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District - Public Hearing – The City granted preliminary plat approval to Onyx Performance Investment, LLC. for Pioneer Highlands. The plat proposed to subdivide one existing lot into four lots. The subject site is located along Pioneer Trail, south of Willow Drive. Staff had scheduled review of the Final Plat for January 17 and intended to hold a hearing on the Storm Sewer Tax District all at the same time. However, the applicant requested a delay to finalize the location of wetland buffers. Staff had already published the notice for public hearing in the paper and therefore are asking that the hearing for creation of the Storm Sewer Tax District be conducted on January 17th. Because notice was provided for the Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District for the January 17th meeting, staff recommends that the City Council hold the hearing, close the hearing, and table consideration of the Tax District ordinance until the approval of the final plat in either February or March of this year. Potential Motion: Motion to table consideration of the ordinance establishing the Pioneer Highlands Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District until the final plat review. 4 XI. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 006670E-006686E for $106,648.22, and order check numbers 053851-053913 for $358,232.41, payroll EFT 0512406-0512440 for $64,422.99. INFORMATION PACKET: • Planning Department Update • Police Department Update • Public Works Department Update • Claims List Medina City Council Work Session Minutes 1 January 3, 2023 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 3, 2023 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in work session on January 3, 2023, at 5:30 p.m. at the Medina City Hall, 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN. I. Call to Order Members present: Martin, Reid, Albers, Cavanaugh, and DesLauriers Members absent: None Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, Planning Director Dusty Finke, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, Public Safety Director Jason Nelson, City Clerk Caitlyn Walker, City Engineer Jim Stremel, and Finance Director Erin Barnhart II. Introduction and Overview of Goal Setting Session Johnson provided a brief overview of the meeting purpose and facilitation. III. Overview of 2022 Work Plan Johnson provided an overview of the 2022 Work Plan which illustrated the accomplishment of goals by all departments. He shared there were 35 goals in 2022 and 25 were completed and 10 are on-going tasks that will be incorporated into the 2023 goals. IV. Administration Department Johnson provided background on the department’s functions and list of goals for 2023. The Council directed staff to separate attracting campus business users and attracting restaurant users into two separate goals. The Council also directed staff to add a goal to continue improving the virtual attendance experience for City Council meetings. II. Public Works Department Scherer provided background on the department’s functions and list of goals for 2023. Scherer shared he wants to focus on building maintenance and create an inventory of all the city building maintenance needs to become more proactive in maintaining city facilities. He also shared there will be a focus on the stormwater maintenance plans. II. Police Department Nelson provided background on the department’s functions and list of goals for 2023. Cavanaugh made a motion to continue the work session meeting immediately after the January 17, 2023, Regular City Council Meeting due to time constraints at 6:55 p.m. Reid seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting continued at 7:42 p.m. III. Planning Department Finke provided background on the department’s functions and list of goals for 2023. Medina City Council Work Session Minutes 2 January 3, 2023 The Council directed staff to add a goal about land acquisition. IV. Finance Barnhart provided background on the department’s functions and list of goals for 2023. The Council directed staff to add a goal about reviewing the City’s cash management and investment policies. V. Other Discussion Topics No further topics were discussed. VI. Adjournment DesLauriers made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:09 p.m. on January 3, 2023. Cavanaugh seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. _________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: ____________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk Medina City Council Meeting Minutes January 3, 2023 1 DRAFT 1 2 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 3, 2023 3 4 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on January 3, 2023 at 5 7:03 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Martin presided. 6 7 I. ROLL CALL 8 9 Members present: Albers, Cavanaugh, DesLauriers, Martin, and Reid. 10 11 Members absent: None. 12 13 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Clerk Caitlyn Walker, Attorney 14 Ron Batty, Finance Director Erin Barnhart, City Engineer Jim Stremel, City Planning 15 Director Dusty Finke, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, and Chief of Police Jason 16 Nelson. 17 18 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE & CEREMONIAL MATTERS (7:03 p.m.) 19 20 A. Oath of Office for Mayor Kathleen Martin 21 Walker administered the Oath of Office to Martin. 22 23 B. Oath of Office for Councilmember Todd Albers 24 Walker administered the Oath of Office to Albers. 25 26 C. Oath of Office for Councilmember Dino DesLauriers 27 Walker administered the Oath of Office to DesLauriers. 28 29 III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:07 p.m.) 30 The agenda was approved as presented. 31 32 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:07 p.m.) 33 34 A. Approval of the December 20, 2022 Work Session City Council Meeting 35 Minutes 36 Martin noted that prior to the meeting she had provided Johnson with a proposed 37 change that has been distributed to the Council. 38 39 Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Martin, to approve the December 20, 2022 work 40 session City Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 41 42 B. Approval of the December 20, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 43 Martin noted that prior to the meeting Johnson distributed changes she had proposed for 44 the minutes for incorporation. 45 46 Moved by Reid, seconded by Cavanaugh, to approve the December 20, 2022 regular 47 City Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 48 49 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes January 3, 2023 2 V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:09 p.m.) 1 2 A. Resolution Establishing 2023 Appointments and Designations to Various 3 City Services, Authorities, Commissions and Agencies 4 5 Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by DesLauriers, to approve the consent agenda. 6 Motion passed unanimously. 7 8 VI. COMMENTS (7:09 p.m.) 9 10 A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 11 There were none. 12 13 B. Park Commission 14 Scherer reported that two members were just appointed to the Commission, one new 15 member and one reappointment. 16 17 C. Planning Commission 18 Finke reported that the Commission will meet the following week to consider the updated 19 architectural information for the Meander Boardwalk project and will also welcome a new 20 member and conduct elections. 21 22 VII. PRESENTATIONS 23 24 A. Medina Legislative Priorities Discussion with Representative Kristin 25 Robbins (7:11 p.m.) 26 Johnson introduced Representative Kristin Robbins. 27 28 Representative Robbins commented that it is an honor to serve the community, noting 29 that she was sworn in today as well. She provided details on the committees that she 30 will be serving on and noted that she will be involved in the Highway 55 corridor as well. 31 She noted bonding projects that she will be involved with as well. She recognized the 32 need for broadband and the interest in a firefighting district, noting that she looks forward 33 to learning more about those issues and working with the City on those topics. She 34 stated that she is also very engaged and active in returning the surplus to taxpayers. 35 36 Martin noted that she met Robbins already at the West Hennepin Mayors meeting and 37 appreciated the discussions she has been able to have already. She commented on the 38 importance of Medina residents having access to reliable and affordable internet service. 39 40 Albers emphasized the importance of funding for a future fire station as that would be 41 intended to serve multiple communities. 42 43 Robbins observed that is a need for the community and surrounding areas. She stated 44 that she has spoken with the State Fire Marshals office and was advised of the items 45 that would need to first be in place, such as a JPA. She stated that she would be happy 46 to be of assistance but would want to see those items in place prior to requesting 47 funding. 48 49 DesLauriers noted a fire service district meeting that will occur the following morning and 50 invited Robbins to attend. He noted that the Hamel Rodeo which currently has a 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes January 3, 2023 3 contract for the site it uses in Corcoran but may need a new home in the future. He 1 suggested that perhaps they could partner with the Hennepin County Fair. 2 3 Martin thanked Robbins for attending and looked forward to working with her in the 4 future. 5 6 B. Resolution Recognizing City Attorney Ron Batty for 36 Years of Service 7 (7:21 p.m.) 8 Johnson commented that it has been an honor and privilege to work with Batty in his 9 time at Medina, noting that Batty has worked for Medina for 36 years. 10 11 Martin commented that she holds Batty in the highest regard, and he has done a 12 wonderful job bringing others up to speed that can take over for him. She read aloud the 13 draft resolution recognizing Batty for 36 years of service to the City. 14 15 Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers, to adopt the resolution recognizing Ron Batty for 16 36 years of service to the City of Medina. Motion passed unanimously. 17 18 Batty commented that he has worked with 10 of 13 mayors of Medina shown on the wall. 19 He commented that Medina has been a great community to work with because of the 20 quality of its staff and members of its councils. He commented that he is not officially 21 retiring but will be stepping back. 22 23 VIII. NEW BUSINESS 24 25 A. Fire Assets Discussion Update (7:29 p.m.) 26 Johnson noted that an e-mail was provided from Barnhart summarizing the meeting held 27 today with the Hamel Fire Department and Loretto Fire Department. 28 29 Barnhart stated that the e-mail summarized the discussions between Loretto and Hamel 30 related to the debt, noting that Hamel will be paying off the debt with their cash on hand 31 and Medina will continue to make payments as scheduled over the next three years. 32 33 Martin reiterated that agreement and provided details on the new agreement the City 34 would have with the new fire department that will be formed by the merging of the two 35 fire departments. 36 37 Barnhart noted that the assets will be signed over for use of the merged fire 38 departments. 39 40 Cavanaugh noted that Medina will be contributing assets and asked if the portion paid by 41 Medina will be less than other communities that are not contributing assets. 42 43 Barnhart provided details and noted that it has been determined that would not be a 44 factor as Hamel was already showing up to those fires with that equipment. She noted 45 that any new assets would be purchased under the new entity and all communities 46 would contribute. 47 48 Martin commented that there has been a lot of discussion on this topic in the fire district 49 meetings. She explained that although Medina has a vested interest in the assets, it 50 does not own anything outright and would only receive payment if the equipment were 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes January 3, 2023 4 sold. She stated that this equipment would stay in service to provide service to the 1 communities and Medina would give up its interest in the assets. 2 3 Barnhart noted that most of the equipment and the Hamel station will remain at that 4 location, it will just change names and run as one department under the new name. 5 6 Albers commented that it sounds like great progress. 7 8 IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (7:38 p.m.) 9 Johnson advised of the upcoming January EDA meeting and thanked Scherer and the 10 public works crew for the great job with snowplowing during the current winter storm. 11 12 X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (7:38 p.m.) 13 No comments. 14 15 XI. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (7:39 p.m.) 16 Moved by Albers, seconded by DesLauriers, to approve the bills, EFT 006650E-17 006669E for $58,123.60, order check numbers 053813-053850 for $103,231.38, and 18 payroll EFT 0512376-0512405 for $62,343.76, and payroll manual check for $223.30. 19 Motion passed unanimously. 20 21 XII. ADJOURN 22 Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Martin, to adjourn the meeting at 7:39 p.m. Motion 23 passed unanimously. 24 25 26 __________________________________ 27 Kathy Martin, Mayor 28 Attest: 29 30 31 ____________________________________ 32 Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk 33 Page 1 of 2 Butterfly Marsh Wetland Bank West Rondeau Lake Drive LLC – Account 1762 PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR WETLAND BANKING CREDITS THIS AGREEMENT is made this 5th_ day of _January_, 2023_ between West Rondeau Lake Drive LLC______(Seller) and _City of Medina (Buyer). 1. Seller agrees to sell to Buyer, and Buyer agrees to buy from Seller, the wetland banking credits (Credits) listed below: *AGC is for Ag bank credits and SWC is for standard bank credits. 2. Seller represents and warrants as follows: a) The Credits are deposited in an account in the Minnesota Wetland Bank administered by the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) pursuant to Minn. Rules Chapter 8420.0700-.0760. b) Seller owns the Credits and has the right to sell the Credits to Buyer. Credits to be Sold Credit Subgroup Credit Type SWC or AGC Wetland Type/Plant Community Type Cost per Credit Credit Amounts B SWC Shallow Marsh $126,324 0.34 acres Per Credit Withdrawal Fee by BSA* Enter the Withdrawal Fee for the BSA of the account: Total Cost: $42,950.16 Total Credits 0.34 SWC AGC SWC AGC BSA 1 $520 $270 BSA 6 $1,083 $586 Withdrawal Fee x total credits = fee BSA 2 $371 $191 BSA 7 $1,992 $1,060 $1,992 Withdrawal Fee: $677.28 BSA 3 $725 $389 BSA 8 $2,577 $1,348 Easement Stewardship Fee: Easement Stewardship fee x total credits = fee BSA 4 $1,412 $724 BSA 9 $2,628 $1,332 $302 Stewardship Fee: $102.68 BSA 5 $685 $367 BSA 10 $3,099 $1,580 Total Fees: $779.64 Grand Total: $43,730.12 Agenda Item #6A Page 2 of 2 3. Buyer will pay Seller a total of $42,950.16 for the Credits, as follows: a) $_1,000__ as earnest money, to be paid when this Agreement is signed; and b) The balance of $ 41,950.16___ to be paid on the Closing Date listed below. 4. [ ] Buyer, [ ] Seller agrees to pay to a withdrawal fee of $677.28 to the State of Minnesota based on the per credit fee of __$1,992__for Bank Service Area _7_ and a stewardship fee of $102.68 based on the per credit fee of $_302__. At the Closing Date, [] Buyer, [ ] Seller will execute a check made out for this amount, payable to the Board of Water and Soil Resources. 5. The closing of the purchase and sale shall occur on _March 3, 2023 (Closing Date) or within three weeks of agency approvals whichever is sooner. The Closing Date and location may be changed by written consent of both parties. Upon payment of the balance of the purchase price, Seller will sign a fully executed Transaction Form to Withdraw Credits provided by BWSR, provide a copy of the Transaction Form to Withdraw Credits to the Buyer and forward the same to the BWSR along with the check for the withdrawal fee and stewardship fee. 6. Buyer has applied or will apply to City of Medina (Local Government Unit (LGU) or other regulatory authority) for approval of a replacement plan utilizing the Credits as the means of replacing impacted wetlands. If the LGU has not approved the Buyer’s application for a replacement plan utilizing the Credits by the Closing Date, and no postponement of the Closing Date has been agreed to by Buyer and Seller in writing, then either Buyer or Seller may cancel this Agreement by giving written notice to the other. In this case, Seller shall return Buyer’s earnest money, and neither Buyer nor Seller shall have any further obligations under this Agreement. If the LGU has approved the replacement plan and the Seller is ready to proceed with the sale on the Closing Date, but Buyer fails to proceed, then the Seller may retain the earnest money as liquidated damages. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ (Signature of Seller) (Date) (Signature of Buyer) (Date) MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jim Stremel, City Engineer DATE: January 12, 2023 MEETING: January 17, 2023 SUBJECT: Willow Drive/TH 55 Regional LS Project – Approve Ctrl Panel Procurement Background: The Willow Drive/TH 55 Regional Lift Station Project will serve properties to the east & west of Willow Drive that are not serviceable with gravity sewer, including the proposed Adams Pest Control development and future Cates Industrial Park projects. The City Council authorized a feasibility study for the lift station in September 2019 and final design of the lift station in July 2022, spurred on by proposed development in the area. With the recent approval of the Cates Industrial Park comprehensive plan amendment, the Adams Pest Control project proceeding, and the lengthy timeframe for material procurement to construct the lift station, the time is quickly approaching to begin procuring materials without jeopardizing the desired construction completion dates. At this point, the approved Adams Pest Control project is driving the need for the lift station and this site will need sewer service as early as the fall of 2023. Lift station components that often have long lead times include pumps, control panels, and generators. The pump lead time is estimated to be 10 to 12 weeks but is not a concern and can be bid with the large project package. Space is reserved at this site for a generator, but it will be installed at a future date. Alternatively, control panel lead times have been volatile the last few years, and current estimates are 18 to 32 weeks. In order to maximize the likelihood that the control panel arrives by August 2023, we recommend beginning its procurement process as soon as possible. To accelerate the control panel procurement, the City can contract with a systems integrator to begin fabricating the panel now and then furnish it for the lift station contractor to install. To that end, we solicited a request for quotations and received two quotes as follows: Total Control Systems, Inc. $37,674.00 (plus tax) Automated Systems Co. $48,454.00 (plus tax) The low quote received is from Total Control Systems, Inc. (TCS). The City frequently uses TCS for systems integration services (facility monitoring, data collection, and alarms), and TCS is familiar with the existing systems and Staff preferences. WSB recommends ordering the control panel from TCS as reiterated in the attached letter of recommendation. 2 The next step is for the City Council to consider authorizing procurement of the control panel for the project from Total Control Systems, Inc. in order to begin its lengthy procurement process and not delay construction completion. Staff intends to request approval of the plans and specifications and authorization for the advertisement for bids for the remainder of the overall lift station project at an upcoming City Council meeting in February, 2023. City Council Action Requested: Adopt the resolution accepting the lowest responsible quotation and awarding the contract to Total Control Systems, Inc. for the panel procurement as a part of the Willow Drive/TH 55 Regional Lift Station Project, in the amount of $37,674.00, plus tax. K:\014877-000\Admin\Construction Admin\Panel RFQ\014877-0020 Panel LOR 010923.docx 17 8 E 9 T H S T R E E T | SU I T E 2 0 0 | SA I N T P A U L , M N | 55 1 0 1 | 65 1 . 2 8 6 . 8 4 5 0 | W S B E N G . C O M January 9, 2023 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Re: Willow Drive Lift Station Control Panel Procurement City of Medina, MN WSB Project No. 014877-000 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Quotes were received for the Control Panel for the Willow Drive Lift Station on Friday, January 6, 2023. Two quotes were received as follows: Total Control Systems, Inc. $37,674.00 (plus tax) Automated Systems Co. $48,454.00 (plus tax) We recommend that the City Council consider these quotes and approve the order in the amount of $37,674.00 to Total Control Systems, Inc. based on the results of the quotes received. Sincerely, WSB Jon Christensen, PE Project Manager Attachments cc: Jim Stremel, WSB kkp January 3rd, 2023 To: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director, City of Medina Re: Willow Sls Panel Estimate. ________________________________________________________________ Total Control Systems, Inc. (TCS) proposes to furnish equipment and services in accordance with the project plans and specifications that were received. Section 40 90 10 Lift Station Controls and Devices 208volt 10hp 3ph Duplex Section as listed, No field installation Including: Lift station control panel Main breaker 200amp (SE rating) 35Kaic Automatic Transfer Switch 200 amp Open transition Manual Transfer 100amp with interlock NEMA 3R 4door double-sided stainless steel enclosure 36h 60w 24d Inner doors Enclosure stainless steel 18” legs and skirts with louvers Enclosure inside lights Incoming power terminal block Generator Receptacle 100amp Power TVSS 70Kaic Pump circuit breakers Pump Starters Size 2 SSOL 10hp Control circuit breakers (7) Hand-Off-Auto switches, oil tight, 30 mm Pushbutton switches, oil tight 30mm Lamps, LED, oil tight, 30mm Condensation heater/fans, 400 watt Ventilation Fan Stainless Steel hoods Power/Phase monitor Relays GFI receptacle rated at 20 amps External alarm strobe and guard Control power TVSS Power supply 24VDC Uninterruptible power supply (UPS) Radio power supply Allen-Bradley Micrologix 1400 equipment Backup controller Operator interface Cmore 7” color Elapsed time meters (2) RTU outlet Floats (2) Suspended Submersible transmitter KPSI750 Total Control Systems, Inc 38841 Nyman Drive NE PO Box 40 Stanchfield, MN 55080-0040 Phone 320-396-4442 / Fax 320-396- 4443 Door switches (Security) Enclosure Temperature Sensor Documentation Testing and commissioning Shipping Price for the SLS estimated control panel package: $37,674.00 total excluding tax. Does not include: Generator Hand holes Meter sockets/Cold sequence disconnects CT cabinet Grounding materials Underground warning tape Installation of panels Conduit Permits Lighting Pole Site Lamp Fixtures Demolition Any wire external to panel Seal fail/Thermal pump modules (By pump supplier) - We acknowledge receipt of Addendum No. - Terms are Net 30 days from invoice date. No retainage allowed. A 1.5% charge per month added to any p ast due balance. Price may be dependent on past credit history. - This quote/proposal valid for 60 days. - Work to commence after receipt of an acceptable written purchase order acknowledging acceptance of our terms. - F.O.B. job-site. - Start-up service/training, documentation and equipment adjustment is included as specified. - TCSI does not accept any liquidated damages. - Any additional insurance not required by specifications will be additional cost. - ALL PANELS FURNISHED BY TCS WILL HAVE A UL 508 SERIALIZED OR UL698A ENCLOSED INDUSTRIAL CONTROL PANEL RELATING TO HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS WITH INTRINSICALLY SAFE CIRCUIT EXTENSIONS LABEL, AS REQUIRED. Sincerely, TOTAL CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC. Al Doberstein AD/kd Submittals 6-8 weeks after receipt of acceptable order. Equipment 12-24 weeks after engineer’s approval. Accepted By ___________________________ Date __________ MANUFACTURER’S REPRESENTITIVES ● SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ● INSTRUMENTATION MAIN OFFICE P.O. BOX 120359 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55112 PHONE 651-631-9005 FAX (651) 631-0027 BRANCH OFFICE P.O. BOX 787 AMES, IOWA 50010 PHONE 515-232-4770 FAX (515) 232-0795 BRANCH OFFICE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS PHONE 815-927-3386 FAX (651) 631-0027 TO: Mr. Steve Scherer PROPOSAL NO: ASC010623TR Public Works Director City of Medina, MN. DATE: January 6, 2023 SUBJECT: Willow Drive Lift Station F.O.B.: Factory with Freight allowed to jobsite. City of Medina, MN. WSB Project No. 014877-000 APPROVAL DRAWINGS: 4-6 Weeks from receipt of an acceptable order. BID DATE: January 6, 2023 @ 11 AM SHIPMENT: 14-16 weeks from receipt of approval. QUOTATION EXPIRES : 45 Days PAGE : 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QUOTATION/PROPOSAL -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This quotation constitutes an offer to furnish the items listed subject to; terms and conditions stated hereon; receipt of your purchase order by Automatic Systems Co.; St. Paul, Minnesota; and written acceptance of your order by Automatic Systems Co. and/or the manufacturer(s) involved as follows: WE ARE PLEASED TO OFFER THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BELOW REFERENCED SPECIFICATION SECTIONS: 40 90 00 – Instrumentation and Control for Process Systems NOTES: 1.) Automatic Systems Company is a specified control system supplier as outlined on spec. page 40 90 00-3. Equipment included in this proposal is in accordance with the project specifications and we take no exceptions. 2.) We will provide a Supply and Performance Bond for the following equipment and services at an additional cost of approximately $18.00/thousand. An insurance certificate will be provided upon request. 3.) All proposed control panels will be factory fabricated, painted, assembled, wired, tested and ready for installation and connection to power and separate mounted control and instrumentation devices. All panels/MCCs will be supplied with a U.L. 508A/698A Sticker and Nameplates as required. AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. M A N U F A C T U R E R S R E P R E S E N T A T I V E QUOTATION/ PROPOSAL NO.: ASC010623TR DATE: January 6, 2023 PAGE: 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QUOTATION/PROPOSAL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A One (1) Willow Drive Lift Station, 208Y/120Vac, 3-phase, 4-wire, 60 Hz, UL-508A/698A labeled, service entrance rated, NEMA 3R 304 stainless steel dead-front enclosure with 18” leg kits, insulation, data pocket, ventilated skirting with bug screen, back chassis, inner doors, door stops, LED enclosure lighting, adjustable thermostat and enclosure heater, adjustable thermostat and enclosure ventilation fan and exhaust with stainless-steel shrouds with bug screen, security door switches, and 100A 3-phase 4-wire generator receptacle with angle adapter as detailed in spec. section 40 90 00. Proposed panel shall be complete with 200A main circuit breaker, 100A mechanically- interlocked standby generator (future) and portable generator circuit breakers, Power Distribution Blocks (PDBs), TVSS, 200A Automatic Transfer Switch (ATS), phase loss/voltage monitor, (2) HMCP pump circuit breakers, (2) 10HP NEMA Size 2 motor starters with solid-state overloads, control power SPD, inner door mounted GFI convenience receptacle, cellular alarm dialer (provided by owner), 120Vac 1-phase circuit breakers, Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS), 24Vdc power supply, unmanaged industrial Ethernet switch, Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) with I/O modules, Operator Interface Terminal (OIT), enclosure temperature transmitter, hand-off-auto selector switches, elapsed time meters, indicator lights, pushbuttons, pump protection modules (provided by pump supplier, installed by ASC), float backup control circuitry, interface relays, intrinsically safe barriers, fuses, terminals, and wireway. Proposed panel shall include the following for separate mounting: • Two (2) Float Switches, supplied with adequate length of cable for installation in the wetwell by others as detailed in spec section 40 90 00. • One (1) Submersible Level Transducer, supplied with adequate length of cable for installation in the wetwell by others as detailed in spec section 40 90 00. • One (1) Float Anchor Weight Kit w/stainless cable for installation of the floats and transducer in the wetwell by others. • One (1) Exterior Alarm Strobe Light, mounted on the exterior of the lift station control enclosure as detailed in spec section 40 90 00. B One (1) Lot of spare parts, per spec. section 40 90 00 3.01. C One (1) Lot of startup, calibration, testing, training, call-back, and on-site services. AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. M A N U F A C T U R E R S R E P R E S E N T A T I V E QUOTATION/ PROPOSAL NO.: ASC010623TR DATE: January 6, 2023 PAGE: 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QUOTATION/PROPOSAL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D One (1) Programming and configuration services, as required to program the PLC, Operator Interface Terminal, and instrumentation at the proposed Lift Station Control Panel including programming configuration services of the owner’s provided cellular dialer for remote alarm monitoring by Wright-Hennepin Co-op. E One (1) Electronic Set of Approval Drawings/Data fully coordinated with primary elements, motor control equipment, mechanical equipment, and auto sensory equipment, includes composite drawings of all power and control wiring for all systems and equipment provided above. F One (1) Electronic Set of Complete Installation, Operation and Maintenance Manuals. Projected Delivery Schedule • Approval Drawings – 4 to 6 weeks from the date of an acceptable order. • Shipment of Lift Station Panel – 14 to 16 weeks from date of receiving approved submittals. Your net price for Items A through F, FOB factory with freight allowed to jobsite including one (1) year warranty from date of startup (not to exceed 18 months from date of shipment) …. $48,454.00 (plus tax unless ST-3 form on file). The above price for Items A through F does not include any: • Sales or use taxes. • Bond costs. • License fees or permits of any kind. • Spare parts of any kind other than those detailed above. • Temporary electric services or equipment. • Generator sets of any kind. • Generator control panel. • Setting or mounting of any control panels/MCCs or primary devices. • Pumps or motors of any kind. • Wall or floor stands or mounting supports for primary devices. • Float mounting brackets or supports. • Concrete housekeeping pads. Agenda Item #6B Resolution No. ________ January 17, 2023 Member ___________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. _______ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING QUOTATIONS AND AWARDING THE CONTRACT WHEREAS, pursuant to a solicitation request for quotes for the panel procurement as a part of the Willow Drive/TH 55 Regional Lift Station Project, the construction of a new lift station system along Willow Drive, sanitary sewer piping, and related improvements, quotations for the panel materials were received, opened electronically, and tabulated according to the law, and the following two quotes were received complying with the solicitation request: Company Grand Total Bid Total Control Systems, Inc. $37,674.00 Automated Systems Co. $48,454.00 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Total Control Systems, Inc. of Stanchfield, MN is the lowest responsible bidder based on the Grand Total Bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with Total Control Systems, Inc. in the name of the City of Medina for the construction of a new lift station system along Willow Drive, sanitary sewer piping, and related improvements, according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Administrator. 2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the Council on January 17, 2023. By: _______________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: By: ___________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk Resolution No. ________ January 17, 2023 2 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ___________ and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 2023 Goals Agenda Item #6C Overarching (1) Institutionalize Employee Shared/Core Values. Hold an employee training session and continue the employee discussion on our core values (On-going) (2) Continue to stay involved with business networking groups, business forums, business tours, attract business and other opportunities to strengthen ties with our local businesses (On-going) (3) Continue to implement electronic document management in the City (includes Laserfiche at City Hall) (4) City Council Reports – Provide more visuals for Council with staff reports (On-going) Administration (1) Work with Council and Staff to try and attract campus business users on Highway 55 (On-going) (2) Work with Council and Staff to try and attract restaurant users (On-going) (3) Continue planning process for Hackamore Road project with the City of Corcoran (4th Quarter) (4) Switch the address database away from Microsoft Access to a new system that is functional in the cloud. (Work with Council Member Albers) (3rd Quarter) a. Create email notification system (not in Outlook) b. Allow residents to subscribe to newsletter via email instead of a mailed newsletter (5) Continue to work with Council and Fire Departments to implement a fire services district/JPA for services (On-going). (6) Continue to work with Rep. Robbins on state funding for a regional fire facility (On-going). (7) Administration will add a meetings section to the weekly Council Update (1st Quarter) (8) The shared calendar will be updated and will be continued to be shared with the City Council (1st Quarter). (9) Work with DDA to update the Classification and Compensation Study and update the Planning Director and Finance Director titles and job descriptions (3rd Quarter). (10) Evaluate hiring practices, personnel recruitment (on-going) (11) Implement a new website that improves access to information for residents and is more efficient to manage for staff (4th Quarter). (12) Coordinate a spring 2023 business forum meeting with Medina Restaurants, City Council, and staff (2nd Quarter). (13) Convert the upper-level conference room into a permanent elections storage and workspace to accommodate the City’s growing election needs (4th Quarter). (14) Have all departments provide more visuals with staff reports (On-going). (15) Review options for Council Member tablets or laptops for meetings (4th Quarter). (16) Review options with Mike Brocco to reduce latency issues with virtual Council Meetings (2nd Quarter). Public Works Streets (1) Complete the street projects (where possible) listed on the CIP for 2023. Projects include Hackamore Road reconstruct, Clydesdale Trail, Foxberry Farms Road, Meadowwoods, Medina Highlands, Morgan Road, Pinto cul-de-sac, and the Townline Road/Juniper Curve project (4th Quarter). (2) Work with finance on a funding strategy for the current street CIP (2nd Quarter). Stormwater (3) Work with planning to complete stormwater maintenance procedures and policies, along with a funding strategy for inspections and future needed maintenance (3rd Quarter). (4) Continue working on TMDL waste load allocations as direction becomes available from the MPCA for the 2021 to 2025 MS4 permit cycle (On-going). (5) Work with WSB to complete the SWPPP for the 2021 to 2025 MS4 permit cycle (3rd Quarter). Water/Sewer (6) Complete the media replacement in filters #1 and #2 to maximize water production (2nd Quarter). (7) Evaluate the new filter run times and begin the treatment plant expansion process if necessary (4th Quarter). (8) Complete upgrade of meter reading system, including the installation of 1,300 new radios (4th Quarter). (9) Complete the Willow Drive lift station project (4th Quarter). Parks/Trails (10) Resume renovations at Hunter Lions Park and evaluate future phases (On-going). (11) Develop a strategy to complete Lakeshore Park renovations within available funding (4th Quarter). (12) Begin the planning process for the Chippewa Road park property (On-going). (13) Secure Deer Hill trail easement (2nd Quarter). Building Maintenance (14) Put together a list of all major maintenance items for each city owned building (4th Quarter). Personnel (15) Complete and document all necessary training certifications for water, sewer, and storm water licenses (3rd Quarter). (16) Keep the Public Works team cross trained on all activities (On-going). Finance (1) Electronic Services Implementation a. Online Services – Hamel Community Building Rental (1st Quarter) b. Other Online forms for electronic submittal (On-going) c. Software options for internal office workflow (On-going) (2) Continue Vendor ACH a. Reduce paper checks (On-going) (3) Review the City’s Cash Management and Investment Policies (2nd Quarter) (4) Assist Training New Staff a. Cross training existing staff (On-going) Public Safety (1) Our number one goal will always be to provide quality public safety services for our citizens, businesses, and visitors by treating all individuals with the utmost respect and dignity in every situation (On-going). (2) Records Management Solution by end of 2023 with implementation in 2024 (On-going) (3) Add more departmental training both internal and with other agencies (On-going) (4) Review and update job responsibilities for Administrative Assistant job descriptions (3rd Quarter). (5) Complete LELS Union Contract (3rd Quarter) (6) Additional Sergeant position for July 2023 (2nd Quarter) (7) Evaluate staffing levels for potential expansion of Wayzata Schools in the City of Medina (4th Quarter) (8) Implement technology upgrades to the training room/emergency operations center (EOC) (3rd Quarter) (9) Gather quotes for evidence room and body camera audits by outside company in 2024 (4th Quarter) (10) Evaluate hiring practices, personnel recruitment (on-going) (11) Tabletop exercise for emergency management with the City Council (2nd Quarter) (12) Create an emergency management press release outline (2nd Quarter) Planning (1) Implement new building permit software (1st Quarter) (2) Affordable and Workforce Housing Plan (1st Quarter) (3) Onboard new Planning/Permit Tech – daily task transitions (1st Quarter) (4) Uptown Hamel Redevelopment Study (2nd Quarter) (5) Stormwater Maintenance Policy/Procedures (3rd Quarter) (6) Applicant/Developer Handbook/Website (4th Quarter) (7) Planning Commission training (On-going) (8) Continue to look for land acquisition opportunities (On-going) Agenda Item #6D TO: Medina City Council FROM: Director Jason Nelson DATE: January 13, 2023 RE: Donation – Doboszenski & Sons Inc. On December 22, 2022, the police department received a check from Doboszenski & Sons, Inc. for $150.00 as a donation for the Medina Police Department. I would ask the Medina City Council to accept the donation and direct staff to respond with a thank you letter to Doboszenski & Sons, Inc. Resolution No. 2023-XX January 17, 2023 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XX RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM DOBOSZENSKI & SONS INC. WHEREAS, Doboszenski & Sons Inc. generously offered to donate a check in the amount of $150 to the City of Medina (the “City”); and WHEREAS, the Donation will be dedicated to the City’s Police Department; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to accept the Donation and express its gratitude to Doboszenski & Sons Inc. for their generosity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota that the City accepts the Donation and thanks Doboszenski & Sons Inc. Dated: January 17, 2023. ____________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Agenda Item #6D Agenda Item #6E TO: Medina City Council FROM: Director Jason Nelson DATE: January 13, 2023 RE: Donation – Steve Lundell On December 15, 2022, the police department received a check from the Steve Lundell Family for $2,500.00 as a donation for the 2023 Cops ‘n Bobbers program. I would ask the Medina City Council to accept the donation and direct staff to respond with a thank you letter to the Lundell Family. Resolution No. 2023-XX January 17, 2023 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XX RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM STEVE LUNDELL WHEREAS, Steve Lundell generously offered to donate a check in the amount of $2,500 to the City of Medina (the “City”); and WHEREAS, the Donation will be dedicated to the City’s Police Department Cops n’ Bobbers program; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to accept the Donation and express its gratitude to Steve Lundell for his generosity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota that the City accepts the Donation and thanks Steve Lundell. Dated: January 17, 2023. ____________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Agenda Item #6E City of Medina Policy, Procedure and Program Manual 97.10 Special Assessment Policy November 4, 2009 (Proposed Amendment: 1/17/2023) 1 97.10 Special Assessment Policyy Purpose: The City’s special assessment policies and procedures have been established to: 1. Provide a stable and continuing source of funding within the financial capacity of the City, in combination with federal, state, county, and other local financial resources available to the City, to accommodate infrastructure needs for new development, redevelopment, and maintenance within the existing community in the most cost-effective manner. 2. Balance needs and costs for new and existing infrastructure to support and promote economic development and growth as well as maintenance within the existing community by providing for the equitable distribution of infrastructure costs to ensure that specific developments are financially self-supporting to the extent warranted. 3. Provide a comprehensive, well-constructed and well-maintained infrastructure system that services individual properties and takes advantage of economies on a regional scale and flexibility in the timing of infrastructure development. 4. Respond to community needs and desires for health, safety, welfare, accessibility, and mobility provided by new infrastructure and the maintenance of existing infrastructure. 5. Function in harmony with the City’s comprehensive plan and growth area plans by providing the infrastructure and amenities associated with those plans thereby promoting orderly growth in areas where services are available or can be provided at the most reasonable cost. 6. Provide the City Council and staff with guidelines and methods to efficiently distribute infrastructure costs to benefiting properties in an equitable and consistent manner thereby enhancing the value of property by assigning a proportionate value of the improvements to the properties deriving benefit from the improvement. General Policy Statement: While the special assessment purposes, policies and procedures have been identified herein, the City Council may deviate from this policy when such rationale in equity arises or the law is required. I. Policy Definitions: A. Adjacent Property: A property directly adjacent to public improvements. B. Access: Properties shall be considered to have access to public street improvements when they may enter onto the improvement from their own private driveway, private road, or public street, or when the street classification would allow the property to be granted driveway access. Properties shall be considered to have access to underground utility improvements when they directly abut and are within 150 feet of the utility. City of Medina Policy, Procedure and Program Manual 97.10 Special Assessment Policy November 4, 2009 (Proposed Amendment: 1/17/2023) 2 C. Accrued Interest (or Compounded Interest): Interest which is calculated not only on the initial principal but also the accumulated interest of prior periods. D. Adjusted Area: An area of a benefited property that has been modified by an adjustment factor to more accurately represent the true benefit that property receives from an improvement in comparison to other properties in the assessment area. The adjustment will be based on the improvement design parameters that are applicable to that parcel, as approved by the City Council. Design parameters that may be used to determine the adjustment factor include, but are not limited to, trip generation, storm water runoff coefficients, water or sanitary sewer use, needed fire flow, and zoning or future land use. E. Assessed Cost: Those costs of public improvements that have been determined to benefit specific properties. The assessed cost will be equal to the project cost minus the City cost. Project costs eligible for assessment include all costs associated with the improvements, including, but not limited to, land acquisition, demolition, construction, administration, engineering, legal, financing and other costs as determined by the City Council. The financing charges include all costs of financing the project. These costs include, but are not limited to, financial consultant’s fees, bond attorney’s fees, and capitalized interest. F. Assessable Footage: The assessable footage is the total front footage of all of the benefiting properties, calculated by using the front footage method. G. Assessment Rate: The assessment rate is determined by dividing the assessable cost of an improvement by the total number of assessment units such as the total adjusted front footage or square footage, acreage, number of lots, or number of parcels. H. Assessment Unit: Front footage, area or unit. I. Benefit: The increase in property value as a result of a public improvement such as a street, sidewalk, trail, curb and gutter, water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, park, or street landscaping. J. Deferment: A process of postponing the collection of the cost of public improvements and funding them as a system cost with the intention of collecting the cost at a later date. K. Driveway Approach: That area which lies between the existing pavement to the right-of- way line; curb cut to curb cut. L. Front Footage: The distance measured along the right-of-way line that directly abuts an improvement, not counting Side-Lot Footage. M. Limited Access Street: A street, such as a major or minor collector street, which because of its high volume of traffic has been designated by the City for controlled access, meaning the number of access points to the street will be limited. N. Lot Definitions: City of Medina Policy, Procedure and Program Manual 97.10 Special Assessment Policy November 4, 2009 (Proposed Amendment: 1/17/2023) 3 1. Corner Lot: A lot located at a street intersection having both front and side-lot footage. 2. Double Frontage Lot: A lot with access to two separate non-intersecting or intersecting streets but not a corner lot. 3. Irregularly Shaped Lot: Those lots abutting curved streets, cul-de-sacs, or other lots where there is more than five feet of difference in length between the front and back lot lines. 4. Rectangular Lot: A lot with less than five feet of difference in length between the front and back lot lines. O. Public Improvement: Improvements as allowed by State statute that provide a special benefit to properties, including but not limited to streets, sidewalks, trails, curb, gutter, sanitary sewer systems, storm sewer systems, water treatment and distribution systems. P. Special Assessment: A legal process whereby the benefited property is charged for all or a portion of the cost of public improvements. Q. Standards for Surface Improvements: Standards for surface improvements have been established in the City’s Engineering Standards. R. Street: All public ways designed as means of access to the adjoining properties. Streets are classified into four groups and classified per a Collector or Local roadway status in the City’s Comprehensive Plan: 1. Local Urban – examples include, but are not limited to, Lakeshore Avenue, Morningside Road, Cherry Hill Trail, Foxberry Farms Road, and Lythrum Lane. 2. Local Rural – examples include, but are not limited to, Chestnut Road, Deerhill Road, and Navajo Road. 3. Collector Urban – examples include, but are not limited to, Hamel Road in Uptown Hamel and Clydesdale Trail connecting TH 55 and CR 116. 4. Collector Rural – examples include, but are not limited to, Hunter Drive, Willow Drive, Tamarack Drive, Pioneer Trail, Hackamore Road, and Chippewa Road. S. Street Treatment Definitions: 1. Crack Seal and Seal Coat – Crack sealing involves patching and sealing cracks in the roadway. This is followed by seal coating, which involves spraying the road with oil and covering it with a layer of small rock. Crack sealing and seal coating is generally considered routine roadway maintenance. The recommended interval is 4-8 years with first application about 5 years after new roadway construction. 2. Mill and Overlay – Milling and overlaying consists of grinding off the upper layer of asphalt (typically 1”-3”) and replacing it with a new layer of asphalt. This is City of Medina Policy, Procedure and Program Manual 97.10 Special Assessment Policy November 4, 2009 (Proposed Amendment: 1/17/2023) 4 generally done on roadways that have a fair amount of cracking and other surface distress, usually at about 60% of the street’s life cycle. This is considered a structural improvement that will renew the street surface and extend its useful life. 3. Rehabilitate – Rehabilitating a roadway consists of grinding up the existing asphalt and mixing it with a portion of the underlying gravel base (typically 4”-8”). This combination of bituminous and gravel is then used as the new road base, and a new asphalt surface is paved over this. This is generally done on roadways that have a significant amount of distress. This can be a good alternative to reconstructing a road if the existing road base appears to be structurally sufficient. 4. Reconstruct – Reconstructing a roadway consists of completely removing the existing road and underlying gravel and sand base material, and constructing a new road section. This may also include correcting any poor base material beneath the section, or updating the road to meet design standards such as width and drainage. This is often done in conjunction with utility repairs/replacement. Generally done on roadways that exhibit signs of major distress, such as rutting, cracking, and potholes. T. System Cost: That portion of the assessable cost that benefits properties whose assessments are deferred because they qualify for green acres status, are located outside of the City limits, or are unable to make use of the improvements due to factors beyond their control. The City may reimburse itself for such system costs from the benefiting properties when the basis for the deferral is no longer valid. U. Unit: A unit may include, but is not limited to: a household; a parcel/lot; water or sewer main length and size; sidewalk or trail length, width and depth; driveway approach length, width and depth. II. Policy Implementation and Procedures: A. Assessment Classification The assessment process shall address the feasibility of physical construction and also the affordability of the improvements. In meeting these responsibilities, a classification system is established below for public improvement projects based on the design capacity and the level of use. Cost apportionment is based on the extent of use of the improvement by the benefiting property owners and City policies for street paving, curb, gutter, and sidewalk construction shall be used as a basic guide. The classification system groups improvements into the three categories: • Type I improvements consist of projects that are mostly of benefit to the abutting properties and include curb, gutter, water and sewer services, and driveway improvements. Street construction, sidewalk, paving, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water mains may be Type I if solely designed to serve the abutting properties. City of Medina Policy, Procedure and Program Manual 97.10 Special Assessment Policy November 4, 2009 (Proposed Amendment: 1/17/2023) 5 • Type II improvements consist of projects that benefit a larger, yet definable, area. Street construction, sidewalk, paving, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water mains may also be Type II if the improvement benefits a larger area. Collector Urban or Collector Local streets, which are likely to be used by a broader segment of the public, should be proportionately assessed to a larger area. • Type III improvements consist of large-scale projects of benefit to the entire City regardless of location. The criteria for designation of any improvement as Type III are facilities that serve areas larger than a definable neighborhood or those areas separated by major identifiable barriers, such as a river, railroad tracks, or collector streets. Typically, Type III improvements are financed through a combination of Federal and State appropriations and available City funds; however, special assessments may be needed to fully fund the project. If financial assistance is received by the City from the Federal Government, from the State of Minnesota, the County, or from any other source to defray a portion of the costs of a given improvement, such aid will be used first to reduce the “City cost” of the improvement. If the financial assistance received is greater than the normal “City cost”, the remainder of the aid will be applied according to the terms of the assistance program or at the Council’s discretion. The assessment classifications are listed in Table 1 below. The City Council may from time to time adjust the classification of improvements to maintain the equitability of the assessment cost. Table 1. Assessment Classification Type I Improvements Type II Improvements Type III Improvements Curb & Gutter Trunk Sanitary Sewers (greater than 8” diameter) Bridges Sidewalks and trails, 5 feet or less Trunk Water Main (greater than 8” diameter) and Looped Water Main Community Facilities Library Law Enforcement Fire Station Sanitary Sewer Laterals (less than or equal to 8” diameter) Collector Streets Water Main (less than or equal to 8” diameter) Sidewalks and trails, greater than 5 feet Collector Streets Sewer & Water Services Storm Drainage Improvements Community Parks Local Urban Streets/Alleys Pumping Stations Wastewater Treatment Facilities Storm Drainage Improvements Water Tower Water Treatment Plant Other improvements mandated or authorized by law B. Methods of Assessment City of Medina Policy, Procedure and Program Manual 97.10 Special Assessment Policy November 4, 2009 (Proposed Amendment: 1/17/2023) 6 The City shall use the following methods in determining assessments for public improvements. 1. Front Footage Method This method computes the assessable frontage for the project and for each property. The assessment rate is obtained by dividing the total assessable cost by the assessable footage in an assessment district. The assessment for each parcel is then obtained by multiplying the assessment rate times the front footage for each property. Front footage is determined as follows: a. For rectangular lots, the front footage shall be the same as the front footage at the right-of-way. b. For irregularly shaped lots, the front footage will typically be calculated as the width of the lot as defined in the City’s zoning ordinance, although other methods may be used at the City’s discretion (such as average lot width) if they are determined to be more equitable. c. For all corner lots, street assessments, regardless of the orientation of the house, shall be based on one-half of the footage of the road being improved. d. For a rectangular corner lot, water and sewer assessments, regardless of the orientation of the house, the short side of the lot shall be considered to be the “frontage”. e. Double frontage lots may be assessed for any street improvement that it has direct access to, if the lot is of such size that it could be split into multiple buildable lots. The front footage for each improvement will be determined in accordance with the above-described policies, whichever is appropriate. 2. Area Method This method computes cost on a square foot or acreage basis. The assessment rate is determined by dividing the total assessable cost by the total benefiting area. A parcel’s assessment is then determined by multiplying the assessment rate times the benefiting area of the parcel. When the benefiting area includes both platted and un-platted properties, the gross benefiting area will be used to apportion the benefit among the properties. An adjustment factor reflecting land use may be applied to a parcel’s benefiting area in some cases. For example, for storm sewer design, the assumed rate of runoff per acre from a commercial lot is greater than the runoff rate from a residential lot. If all uses are the same in a project area (single family, multi-family, commercial, or industrial), the assessment rate is the same for all. Where there is variation in residential density or uses, the assessment rate may be adjusted to reflect the corresponding differences in benefit. The assessable area shall include all properties legally eligible for assessments. The following items may not be included in area calculations: public right-of-ways, natural waterways, lakes or other wetlands. City of Medina Policy, Procedure and Program Manual 97.10 Special Assessment Policy November 4, 2009 (Proposed Amendment: 1/17/2023) 7 3. Unit Method This method computes the costs on the basis of individual assessment units. For example, sewer and water services, sidewalks, trails, and driveway approaches are typically considered separate individual units. The total project cost is divided by the total number of assessment units to calculate the fixed cost. Assessment units could be determined on a per lot or per unit basis, or any combination thereof. For lots that may be further subdivided, the City may determine the number of assessable units based on the number of equivalent lots that could be created from a particular parcel. 4. Combination Method This method involves using one or more of the above defined methods to more equitably calculate assessments. The combination method shall be considered when there is varying land use, undeveloped properties available for future development, or other circumstances involving the defined public improvement that may provide assessment inequities. C. Determination of Assessable Costs, Rate and Term 1. Water System a. Water Mains: The assessable cost for installing new water main improvements shall be based on the level of service required by the property. In residential areas, 100% of the cost of installing water main that is 8-inches in diameter or less shall be assessed to the benefiting properties, and up to 50% for reconstruction, see chart below. In commercial areas, 100% of the cost of installing new water main and 50% of the cost of reconstruction will be assessed, based on current design standards. The cost of over sizing the water main for general distribution purposes shall not be assessed. Where larger diameter water mains are required to serve commercial, industrial or institutional properties, the increased cost of water main installation shall be assessed to those properties. Where improvements are designed to serve an area beyond that of direct benefit, the City may postpone the assessment and fund the increased project cost as a system cost. The system cost shall be assessed to the newly developing area as a system charge together with direct benefits for other services. Reconstruction Assessments Years After First Assessment Levied1 City Share2 Assessed Share2 0-20 years 100% 0% 20-40 years 75% 25% Over 40 years 50% 50% 1First assessment refers to the original assessment for properties developed or platted at or before the time the improvement is constructed or to the deferred assessment for properties developed or platted some time after the improvement is constructed. City of Medina Policy, Procedure and Program Manual 97.10 Special Assessment Policy November 4, 2009 (Proposed Amendment: 1/17/2023) 8 2Percentage based on project construction cost. The assessed share of the project cost, as listed in the above table, will be apportioned against the benefiting properties. The City Engineer will use standard procedures to determine the benefiting property for each specific project. a. Water Services: The assessable cost for the construction or replacement of water services shall be 100% of the project cost. The unit cost method will be used to calculate the assessment. 2. Sanitary Sewer Sanitary Sewer Assessments shall be based on engineering design standards. The assessable cost for installing sanitary sewer improvements shall be based on the type of service required by the property. In residential areas, 100% of the cost of installing new sanitary sewer that is 8-inches in diameter; and up to 50% for reconstruction, shall be assessed to the abutting properties. The assessable cost for the construction or replacement of sewer and water services shall be 100% of the project cost. The unit cost method will be used to calculate the assessment. The cost of pumping stations, lift stations, force mains, and over sizing the sanitary sewer to provide service to properties that do not directly abut the improvements shall be proportionally assessed to the entire design service area. Where larger diameter sanitary sewers are required to serve commercial, industrial or institutional properties, the increased cost of installation shall be assessed to those properties. Where improvements are designed to serve an area beyond that of direct benefit, the City may defer that portion of the assessment and fund it as a system cost. The system cost shall be assessed or otherwise charged to the newly developing area as a system charge together with direct benefits for other services. a. Sanitary Sewer Assessment Formula: Assessments to be levied against properties within the benefited area shall be distributed to those properties on the basis of the following provisions: 1. Assessment Rate: The assessment rate shall be equal to the “assessable cost” of the improvement divided by the total number of assessable units benefited by the improvement. Projects having an uneven distribution of benefits may be subdivided into separate improvements using multiple assessment methods and rates to more equitably apportion the assessments. 2. Assessable Units: The assessable units shall be determined as follows: i. Lateral Sewers. The assessable unit shall be the “front footage” of the property, unless otherwise specified by the Council. ii. Trunk Sewer and Lift Station. The assessable unit shall be the area (square foot or acre) of the benefited property, both present and future, as determined in the project design, unless otherwise specified by the Council. iii. Sewer Services. The assessable cost for the construction or replacement of sewer service lines shall be 100% of the project cost. The assessment shall be based on the number of sewer services installed for each individual property. This is the unit cost method of assessment. City of Medina Policy, Procedure and Program Manual 97.10 Special Assessment Policy November 4, 2009 (Proposed Amendment: 1/17/2023) 9 3. Assessment Formula for Replacement: The following table shows the cost split for replacement of sanitary sewers (trunk sewers, lateral sewers, and lift stations), if they are to be assessed. Reconstruction Assessment 1First assessment refers to the original assessment for properties developed or platted at or before the time the improvement is constructed or to the deferred assessment for properties developed or platted some time after the improvement is constructed. 2Percentage based on project construction cost. The assessed share of the project cost, as listed in the above table, will be apportioned against the benefiting properties. The City Engineer will use standard procedures to determine the benefiting property for each specific project. 4. Length of Assessment: The assessment period for sanitary sewer improvements, including new construction and replacement projects, is a maximum of twenty years. 3. Storm Sewer Storm sewer improvements shall be classified to include all storm sewer, storm sewer pumping stations, culverts, ditches, rain gardens, swales, street grading and any other improvement, which will facilitate drainage. The assessment for the construction of storm drainage improvements shall be based on the level of service required by the property. a. Storm Sewer Assessment Formula: Assessments to be levied against properties within the benefited area shall be distributed to those properties on the basis of the following provisions: 1. Assessment Rate: The assessment rate shall be equal to the assessable cost of the improvement divided by the total number of assessable units benefited by the improvement. Projects having an uneven distribution of benefits may be subdivided into separate improvements using multiple assessment methods and rates to more equitably apportion the assessments. 2. Assessable Units: The assessable unit, unless otherwise specified by the Council, shall be the gross area (square foot or acre) of the benefited properties, both present and future, as determined in the project design. Years After First Assessment Levied1 City Share2 Assessed Share2 0-20 years 100% 0% 20-40 years 75% 25% Over 40 years 50% 50% City of Medina Policy, Procedure and Program Manual 97.10 Special Assessment Policy November 4, 2009 (Proposed Amendment: 1/17/2023) 10 3. Assessable Cost: The assessable cost shall be 100% of the total project cost for new or expanded storm drainage improvements, and up to 50% for reconstruction, based on the chart below. Reconstruction Assessment Years After First Assessment Levied1 City Share2 Assessed Share2 0-20 years 100% 0% 20-40 years 75% 25% Over 40 years 50% 50% 1First assessment refers to the original assessment for properties developed or platted at or before the time the improvement is constructed or to the deferred assessment for properties developed or platted some time after the improvement is constructed. 2Percentage based on project construction cost. The assessed share of the project cost, as listed in the above table, will be apportioned against the benefiting properties. The City Engineer will use standard procedures to determine the benefiting property for each specific project. 4. Assessment Formula for Replacement: The cost split for replacement of storm sewers, lift stations, and miscellaneous drainage improvements, if they are to be assessed, will be assessed in the same manner as sanitary sewer replacement, as shown above. 5. Length of Assessment: The assessment period for storm sewers, lift stations, and miscellaneous drainage improvements is a maximum of twenty years. 4. New Street Construction The City’s general policy and practice is to require new residential street construction during land use development applications to be constructed to City standards by the developer/applicant with no special assessments or public bonding support. 5. Street Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Mill and Overlays a. Local Urban Roadways - The assessable cost of local urban projects shall be 50% of the total project cost necessary to conduct a street improvement within the public right-of-way to the current Standards for Surface Improvements in the City’s Engineering Standards. The remaining cost shall be a City cost. The method of assessment shall be based on per unit when assessed properties are of similar use, intensity, and size. The method of assessment may be based on area, front footage, or a combination of both when the City determines that it is appropriate because properties to be assessed vary in terms of use, intensity, or size. The remaining cost shall be a City cost. b. Collector Urban Roadways – The assessable cost of collector urban projects shall be 40% of the total project cost necessary to conduct a street improvement within City of Medina Policy, Procedure and Program Manual 97.10 Special Assessment Policy November 4, 2009 (Proposed Amendment: 1/17/2023) 11 the public right-of-way to the current Standards for Surface Improvements in the City’s Engineering Standards. The remaining cost shall be a City cost. The rate for collector urban projects shall be calculated using the area or front footage method, or a combination of both. An additional commercial or future developable land use factor will be applied to mixed use areas. c. Local Rural Roadways – The assessable cost of local rural projects shall be 50% of the total project cost necessary to conduct a street improvement within the public right-of-way to the current Standards for Surface Improvements in the City’s Engineering Standards. The remaining cost shall be a City cost. The method of assessment shall be based on per lot. An additional commercial or future developable land use factor will be applied to mixed use areas. Alternatively, the method of assessment may be based on area, front footage, or a combination of both when the City determines that it is appropriate because properties to be assessed vary in terms of use or intensity. d. Collector Rural Roadways – The assessable cost of collector rural projects shall be prepared in the form of an assessment roll at 22% of the total project cost necessary to conduct a street improvement within the public right-of-way to the current Standards for Surface Improvements in the City’s Engineering Standards. The City Council may consider lowering the 22% assessable cost to no less than 20% for the final assessment. The remaining cost shall be a City cost. The method of assessment shall be based on a combination method. The remaining cost shall be a City cost. e. Frontage Roads and Alleys – The assessable cost of frontage roads or alleys will be the same as for local urban roadways, and should be assessed against the abutting properties using the front foot or area method, or a combination of both in mixed- use districts and per lot method for urban residential land uses. f. Corner Lots – The City shall provide a credit to corner lot owners who are assessed for two or more abutting street improvements and assessments. g. Curb and Gutter – The assessable cost of curb and gutter installation shall be 100% for new construction, and up to 50% for reconstruction. The benefited property shall be assessed using front footage method. When replacement of a limited portion of curb and gutter is completed in connection with a mill and overlay, the cost may be incorporated into the cost of the street project and assessed under the method corresponding to the street assessment. h. Length of Assessment – The assessment period for street improvements is a maximum of twenty years. 6. SIDEWALK The front footage or fixed cost method shall be the basis for assessment. The assessable cost for sidewalk improvements shall be 100% for both new construction and City of Medina Policy, Procedure and Program Manual 97.10 Special Assessment Policy November 4, 2009 (Proposed Amendment: 1/17/2023) 12 reconstruction up to 5 feet. Sidewalk maintenance and rehabilitation shall be repaired or replaced to the original standard and is the responsibility of the abutting property owner. 7. DRIVEWAY APPROACHES The assessable cost for driveway approaches, both new and reconstructed, shall be 100%. Assessments to be levied against properties within the benefited area shall be distributed to those properties on the basis of the following provisions: a. Assessment Rate: The assessment rate for each individual property shall be equal to the assessable cost of the project divided by the total number of assessable units benefited by the improvement. b. Assessable Units: The assessable unit, unless otherwise specified by the Council, shall be calculated using the area method of the benefited properties. The size and design standard of individual driveways determines the assessment for that property. c. Assessable Cost: The assessable cost shall be determined in accordance with Section II B of this policy. d. Length of Assessment: The assessment period for driveways is a maximum of twenty years. D. Deferred Assessments for Green Acres In cases where improvement projects are determined to benefit properties that have been certified to qualify for Green Acres exemption, the City will determine that portion of the project cost that benefits those properties, and finance that portion of the project cost as a system cost. Landowners of benefiting properties may have the option of paying the entire assessment in one lump sum or through deferral as allowed by Minnesota Green Acres statutes. During the period of deferral, the City will add the Accrued Interest to the principal. Once the benefiting properties no longer qualify for Green Acres status, the City may recover the system cost. Assessments against Green Acres Parcels will be filed with the County Recorder. E. Determination of Assessment Rate and Terms 1. Interest Rate on Assessments: The City will charge interest on special assessments at a rate specified in the resolution approving the assessment roll. If bonds were sold to finance the improvement project, the interest rate shall generally be two percent (2.0%) more than the average rate of the bonds, rounded to the nearest quarter of a percent. If no bonds were sold, the interest rate shall be set using the same formula based on the current bond market. City of Medina Policy, Procedure and Program Manual 97.10 Special Assessment Policy November 4, 2009 (Proposed Amendment: 1/17/2023) 13 2. Length of Assessment: The assessment period for all improvements is subject to the requirements of the bond market at the time of project financing and thus may vary in length from the time periods proposed. F. Undeveloped Property The City shall require the developer, owner or sub-divider of any property within the City’s corporate limits desiring to install street, curb and gutter, sidewalk, sanitary sewer or water main improvements to follow the City’s subdivision ordinance, in addition to the following: 1. Upon written request by a developer, the City Council shall give consideration to the preparation of a feasibility report to determine the feasibility of construction for the desired improvements. The developer will prepare a plan and other such information, as the Council requires, prior to the Council making a decision on the request. 2. The developer and/or the property owner are required to sign a Developer’s Agreement and Petition and Waiver Agreement prior to awarding a contract. 3. At the completion of an improvement, all improvement costs will be recorded or certified to the County per the Developer’s Agreement G. Petitioned Improvement Projects The City will consider petitioned improvement projects. However, the need for specific projects shall be determined based on engineering standards (e.g. the existing condition represents a physical or structural hazard, or is no longer cost-effective to maintain, etc.) as determined by the City Public Works Superintendent and City Engineer and approved by the City Council. Petitioned projects may be rejected by the City if it is determined that they are not necessary. The City Council has the authority to initiate non-petitioned improvement projects, if it is felt the improvements are in the best interest or safety of the citizens. Policy Approval: City Council approved on 2/17/2009; City Council amended on 7/21/2009; City Council amended on 11/4/2009: Proposed amendment 1/17/2023 Loram/Scannell Page 1 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: January 11, 2023 MEETING: January 17, 2023 City Council SUBJECT: Loram/Scannell Properties – Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review, CUP - PIDs 1111823230001, 1111823220003, and 1111823210005 Summary of Request Scannell Properties and Loram have requested land use approval for development of approximately 396,000 square feet of warehouse/office space located east of Arrowhead Drive, south of Highway 55. Loram proposes to occupy the building on Lot 2 (Bl 1) for warehousing, replacing storage at other sites. The other buildings would be available for lease and managed by Scannell. The applicant has indicated that they were hopeful that vendors and businesses related to Loram may move into some of these spaces. The City Council reviewed and approved the wetland replacement plan related to the project in October/November 2022. General information on the broader development was included with the report at that time, but the applicant was waiting to make plan updates until the decision on the wetland permit because the design was contingent upon the wetland impacts. The applicant has indicated that they intend to construct the buildings on Lots 1 and 2 (Block 1) during 2023. Timing of construction on Lot 3 would depend on the market. No construction is proposed on the lot east of the wetland at this time. This vacant lot to the east of the wetland (Lot 1, Block 2) will be referred to as the “eastern lot” in this report. The following applications have been requested to implement the proposed construction: 1) Preliminary plat for subdivision of four lots. 2) Site Plan Review for new construction. 3) Conditional Use Permit for Warehouse use and Outside Storage on Lot 2 The subject site is predominantly farmland. There is a large wetland along the east of the subject site and six smaller wetlands located around the property. Most of the site is fairly flat, except the eastern portion which slopes to the wetland. The aerial at the top of the following page depicts the subject site and surrounding land uses as follows: • North – Loram main facility – zoned Industrial Park • South – Automotorplex – zoned PUD • West – Hennepin County Public Works facility – zoned PUD • Southeast – BAPS temple (site plan approved, currently vacant) – zoned business Park • East – Wayzata Schools (guided Mixed Residential) MEMORANDUM Proposed construction: 3 buildings, 396,000 s.f. Subdivision: Four lots Area: 43 acres Future Land Use: Business Staging: 2018 Zoning: Industrial Park (IP) Loram/Scannell Page 2 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Comprehensive Plan and Zoning The property is guided for Business development in the Comprehensive Plan and staged for current development (staged after 2018). The property is zoned Industrial Park (IP). Environmental Assessment Worksheet Chapter 4410 of Minnesota Rules regulates Environmental Review and requires mandatory completion of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for development of 300,000 square feet or more of warehouse/light industrial space within a city of Medina’s size. The purpose of an EAW is to develop an analysis and overview of the potential impacts of the development, determine if the project will cause any significant environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated through normal review processes, and provide information for planning and design. The EAW was completed and reviewed by relevant agencies during the spring of 2022. The City Council adopted the Findings of Fact and Record of Decision on the EAW on April 5, 2022 and determined that the project does not necessitate an Environmental Impact Statement. The City received comments which recommended reducing wetland impacts with any development and also related to recommended stormwater management and traffic improvements. Loram/Scannell Page 3 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Preliminary Plat The applicant proposes to plat the subject property into four lots and two outlots. The following table compares the proposed lots to the standards of the IP District. IP Requirement Lot 1 (west lot) Lot 2 (north lot) Lot 3 (south lot) Lot 4 (east lot) Minimum Lot Area 5 acres 7.50 acres 5.07 acres 8.79 acres 15.06 acres Minimum Lot Width 300 feet 777 feet 322 feet 455 feet 380 feet Minimum Lot Depth 300 feet 420 feet 683 feet 822 feet 1125 feet The stormwater pond and wetlands to the east of the development site are proposed within outlot A. A separate outlot (B) is proposed east of the existing Loram facility. The applicant has indicated that they may combine this outlot with the Loram property in the future. The property is proposed to be platted and developed as an Integrated Development, with parking, driveways, and loading docks crossing the property lines between the lots. The City amended the zoning ordinance late last year to clarify that certain standards such as setbacks and impervious surface calculations can be reviewed on a development-wide basis within the IP district. Transportation, Streets, Right-of-way and Access The applicant proposes a new access along the south of the property, and also to connect to and share the existing Loram access just north of the property line. Lots 2 and 3 will sit east of Lot 1 and not have frontage on a public or private roadway. The City recently amended the subdivision code to allow for lots to be created without frontage within an integrated development, provided adequate access easements are in place. Staff recommends this as a condition of approval. Arrowhead Drive is a Hennepin County roadway (CR118), and Hennepin County recommends that a left-turn be constructed at the new southern access as part of the required site improvements. Hennepin County recommended 50-feet of right-of-way, and the preliminary plat appears to propose such dedication. The County also recommends that the existing trail along Arrowhead Drive be reconstructed and shifted to the east for increased distance from Arrowhead Drive. The trail was shifted closer to Arrowhead Drive along this property to avoid wetland impacts. Staff does not recommend Loram/Scannell Page 4 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting relocating the trail unless it is necessary for road widening. Staff does recommend additional trail easement be required to accommodate future relocation if necessary. The eastern lot has frontage on Tamarack Drive right-of-way. Tamarack Drive has not been constructed to current standards because it has only been necessary to access vacant farmland. Development of the eastern lot (Lot 1, Block 2) cannot occur until the street has been constructed to required standards. This would either be a condition of development of the eastern lot or may be completed by other nearby development. The City completed the Tamarack Drive study in 2020, which anticipates a signalized intersection at Highway 55 and Tamarack Drive with a significant number of turn lanes. Staff recommends a condition that 70’ of right-of-way be provided along the east of the eastern lot as described in the study. Wetlands/Floodplains The subject property is adjacent to a large wetland to the east of the development site with the eastern lot on the other side of the wetland. There are six smaller wetlands located throughout the site. The applicant proposes to impact five of the other wetlands in their entirety and much of the western wetland for a total of 1.22 acres of wetland impacts for the proposed construction. The City Council approved the impacts and the wetland replacement plan on December 6, 2022. The wetland protection ordinance requires upland buffers with average width as described to the right: As noted above, most of the small wetlands are proposed to be impacted in their entirety. Much of the western wetland is also proposed to be impacted and smaller impacts are proposed along the east of the larger wetland to the east. The applicant proposes retaining walls immediately adjacent to the impacts on the edge of the wetlands to remain, which prevents minimum required upland buffers from being created. The applicant proposes to provide wider areas of buffers along the remaining frontage to offset the lack of buffers adjacent to the wetland. Staff believes allowing this additional buffer averaging is consistent with the purpose of the buffer regulations. Floodplains No floodplains are identified by FEMA mapping on the subject property. Sewer/Water/Easements Existing sewer and water mains are located within Arrowhead Drive and along the southern property line of the subject property. Staff recommends that the sewer and water lines extended to serve the three properties remain privately owned and operated. The City Engineer has reviewed and provided comments on the utility plans, which staff recommends be addressed. Staff recommends that drainage and utility easements be provided as recommended by the City Engineer, including along the perimeter of lots, over utilities, and over wetland areas. Wetland Required buffer Large wetland to east 30 feet Other wetlands 20 feet Loram/Scannell Page 5 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Park Dedication City’s subdivision regulations allow the City the following options related to dedication for parks, trails, and open space purposes: • 2.6 acres of land to be dedicated – 10% of the buildable property • $308,880 (estimated) in-lieu of land dedication – 8% of the pre-developed market value • Combination of land and cash The City’s parks plan does not call for parkland in the area of the subject site. As such, staff does not recommend land for park purposes. The trail plan identifies the existing trail along Arrowhead Drive. Staff recommends that additional trail easement be required along the proposed right-of-way to allow for relocation of the trail in the future if Hennepin County determines that it desires to do so. Staff recommends a 12’-wide easement along the west of the site (approximately 0.21 acre, or 9.7% of the allowed land dedication). The Diamond Lake Regional Trail master plan preferred route was identified east of the site, nearer the future Tamarack Drive corridor. Staff believes it is appropriate to consider whether easement for the regional trail should be required in any subdivision within the vicinity of the regional trail route. If land is obtained by the City through dedication and conveyed to the Park District for the regional trail, the District would reimburse the City the market value of the easement (up to the entire amount). The preferred route does identify the trail east of Tamarack Drive, on property currently owned by the City. It should be noted that if the City requires land in multiple locations to provide flexibility, it would only be reimbursed for the land which is ultimately utilized for the regional trail. Nonetheless, staff believes providing alternatives for future flexibility is important. This is especially true for the future crossing of Highway 55. The crossing will be complex and is of high importance to the City, so providing more alternatives and flexibility seems worth the potential of lost park dedication fees which may not reimbursed. Loram/Scannell Page 6 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting While additional study, planning, and design is necessary to identify the location for the Highway 55 crossing, in preliminary discussion with Park District staff, the primary advantage of requiring land dedication in this case is to secure the land for future flexibility. Other potential advantages were identified for the crossing of Highway 55 west of Tamarack. • There appear to be more options for the trail corridor between Meander Road and Highway 55 to the west of Tamarack. o Much of the property to the north of Hwy 55, west of Tamarack is planned for future development, which would provide the opportunity to require dedication of a north-south route between Meander Road and Highway 55. o There is also another parcel which runs north-south which may present another opportunity. o On the other hand, a significant stretch of the property east of Tamarack, north of Highway 55 has been developed, and the City has required its maximum amount of park dedication from this property. As a result, dedication could not be required, but would require acquisition. • The trail is generally anticipated to run northwest and southwest. A crossing west of Tamarack may be more direct and reduce street crossings. • Topography is generally higher to the west of Tamarack compared to the east, which make construction easier. Staff discussed the potential of requiring land for the Diamond Lake trail with leadership at Loram. The applicant indicated that they were open to providing a large easement through and adjacent to the wetland to provide flexibility and to account for their park dedication contribution. The easement would be over 6 acres in total area, but much of it is within the wetland on the eastern lot. The area is shown in green above, showing how two potential crossing locations could be accommodated. The Park Commission reviewed back in the fall of 2022. The Commission recommended that easement be required along Arrowhead Dr for potential relocation of the roadside trail, and that the City require easements for the Diamond Lake Regional Trail from the eastern lot. Loram/Scannell Page 7 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Review Criteria/Staff Recommendation The following criteria are described in the subdivision ordinance: “In the case of all subdivisions, the City shall deny approval of a preliminary or final plat if one or a combination of the following findings are made: (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city, or that the proposed subdivision is premature, as defined in Section 820.28. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. Subject to the conditions noted below, staff believes it is reasonable to conclude that the above findings have not been made. Staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include the conditions described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy. 2. The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated 11/21/2022 except as may be modified herein. The design of all improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing construction. 3. The Applicant shall grant the following easements to meet park dedication requirements: a. Trail easement 12 feet in width along Arrowhead Drive b. Trail easement over the portions of Lot 1, Block 2 as displayed in the staff report dated 1/12/ 2022. c. Agreement to provide easement to access the trail easement area for construction. 4. The plat shall dedicate drainage and utility easements as recommended by the City Engineer, including but not limited to, adjacent to the perimeter of the lots, over all water mains and hydrants, over stormwater improvements, and over all wetland areas. 5. The plat shall be subject to the City’s wetland protection ordinance, including provision of minimum required upland buffers adjacent to wetlands on the site and vegetation establishment. 6. The Applicant shall execute and record access easement and agreements in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney to provide adequate access to the lots. 7. Sewer and watermain improvements within the lots shall be privately maintained. The mains along the southern property line shall be dedicated as public improvements upon completion. 8. The plat shall be updated to dedicate right-of-way with a width of 70’ along the east of Lot 1, Block 2. 9. The Applicant shall address the comments of the City Engineer. 10. Turn lane improvements on Arrowhead Drive as recommended by Hennepin County Transportation shall be constructed as part of the subdivision improvements. Loram/Scannell Page 8 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting 11. The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site improvements in order to ensure completion. 12. The Applicant shall provide title documentation at the time of final plat application and abide by the recommendations of the City Attorney with regard to title matters. 13. The final plat applicant shall be filed within 180 days of the date of the resolution granting preliminary approval or the approval shall be considered void unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council. 14. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, construction plans, and other relevant documents. Proposed Site Plan The applicant has indicated that the proposed uses would include predominantly warehouse space along with office space. Warehouse/distributing is an allowed conditional use in the IP district, and office is a permitted use. The CUP for warehousing will be discussed later in this report. Any other use would be subject to confirmation that such use is permitted in the district and potentially subject to separate conditional use permit review. Following is a summary comparing the proposed construction to the dimensional standards of the IP district. IP District Requirement Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 feet 150’ 75’ (W) 75’ (W) Rear Yard Setback 50 feet 60’ (E) 62’ (E) 55’ (E) Side Yard Setback 50 feet 85’ (N) 92’ (S) 73’ (N) 87’ (S) 92’ (N) 102’ (S) Setback from Residential 100 feet 332’ (SW) NA 225’ (E) Parking Setbacks Front Yard 50 feet 68’ NA NA Rear and Side Yard 50 feet (25’ w/ buffer) 25’ 0’ (N-shared) 25’ (S) Maximum Hardcover 70% 70% (int. dev.) 70% (int. dev.) 70% (int. dev.) Building Height 35 feet 33.8’ 33.8’ 33.8’ As noted above, Loram proposes to occupy the building on Lot 2. The applicant proposes to construct parking across the northern property line of Lot 2 to accommodate shared parking with the Loram building to the north. The applicant also proposes the loading dock court to be divided by the property lines for each building to allow for shared use of this area. Earlier renditions of the plan exceeded the maximum hardcover permitted on the development site in the IP district. Loram owns property to the northeast of the development site and proposes to transfer land, most of it wetland, from this adjacent property into the subject site. This effectively reduces the percentage of hardcover by increasing the lot area without reducing the amount of hardcover. Loram/Scannell Page 9 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Wetlands and Floodplains Matters related to wetlands and floodplains are described within the preliminary plat section above. The site plan proposes to impact 1.22 acres of wetlands. The Council approved the wetland conservation act permit authorizing the impacts at the December 6, 2022 meeting. Mitigation is proposed through purchase of credits from Anoka County. There are no floodplains upon the property Building Materials and Design The IP zoning district requires the following architectural standards. The Council can discuss whether the proposed building is consistent with the standards or recommend conditions if necessary. Materials The applicant proposes pre-cast concrete building with some brick accents. The IP district requires: “All exterior building materials shall be durable and non-combustible (except for wood used as an allowed accent material), consisting of one or more of the following: At least 20 percent shall be brick, natural stone, granite, stucco (but not - Exterior Insulation and Finish System (EIFS)), copper or glass. Up to 20 percent may be wood, engineered wood, fiber cement, anodized aluminum or similar metals which may be used as an accent material if appropriately integrated into the overall building design and in the case of wood, not subject to damage caused by heavy use or exposure. Lap siding shall not be used. When requested, samples of the external materials shall be submitted to the City. Concrete and pre-cast concrete panels may be allowed provided the total of such material does not make up more than 80 percent of the exterior material. Materials Required Building 1 Building 2 Building 3 Glass, stone, brick, stucco Min 20% 14% glass, 6% brick 10% glass, 10% brick 13% glass, 8% brick Precast concrete Max 80% 80% 80% 79% Metal, wood, fiber cement Max 20% Loram/Scannell Page 10 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Building Appearance – The IP district requires: “All buildings and structures and remodeling of either existing or new buildings shall take into account compatibility related to architectural quality and mass of the structure to be constructed. Elements of compatibility include, but are not limited to: building form, mass, height and bulk; fenestration, exterior materials and their appearance, color (compatible and harmonious with the building, other nearby buildings which meet the standards described above and the natural setting in the area) durability, setback, landscaping, exterior lighting, and site improvements.” Modulation The IP district requires: “The design of buildings shall employ architectural modulation to minimize the apparent scale and dimension of structures. Modulation means harmonious changes or variations of the massing and façade of a structure. Modulation is intended to achieve high quality architecture which is aesthetically pleasing and functional. Modulation may be achieved by variations in the form, mass, bulk and height of structures and shall be combined with architectural features to achieve a high standard of design. At least the following shall be used as guidelines: (1) Building design should avoid blank walls and large unbroken expanses of walls exposed to the outside. (2) Building design should mitigate the visual impacts of a large building mass through offsets, projections, and recesses in the façade. (3) The appearance of massive roofs should be avoided by variations in the rooflines and height. Dormers, deep eaves, overhangs and cornices may help create visual interest. (4) Decorative roof elements should be incorporated into other roof or wall elements to avoid looking “tacked on.” (5) Building elevations should be articulated to provide a reasonable amount of visual interest by varying the shape or pattern of windows, building materials, textures, and colors.” Building 1, which is most visible along Arrowhead Drive, is approximately 600 linear feet parallel with the roadway. Architectural design of the facade is differentiated by color variations of the proposed precast panels and areas of more increased window coverage at the corners of the building and in the center. A series of small parapet walls variations is also included. The City Council can provide feedback on whether the architectural design is consistent with the standards above. Transportation/Access Transportation and access are discussed above within the review of the preliminary plat. Staff recommends that pedestrian connections be improved throughout the site. Non-Pedestrian Transportation Staff recommends that the internal sidewalk configuration be improved to allow more convenient walking throughout the site and between buildings. The IP district also requires that bicycle rack locations be identified. Loading Docks The IP district requires that loading dock areas be screened from adjacent property and streets to the fullest extent practicable. The proposed layout screens loading docks between the buildings very well from the north, south, and west. Loram/Scannell Page 11 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting The IP district also states that loading docks shall not be located within 300 feet of a residential property. The loading docks are approximately 250 feet from the eastern property line, which is with a property guided for residential development. There are approximately 475 feet of wetland east of the property line before the buildable land to the east. Staff would recommend significant screening east of the loading dock and that no loading docks be permitted on the eastern 50 feet of Building 3. Parking The applicant proposes 392 parking spaces and has indicated that this should be sufficient based upon their experience developing and managing similar buildings. A narrative describing their experience with parking demand is attached for reference. The uses anticipated by the applicant are described in the table to the right. The following table describes the City’s minimum parking standards, based upon the applicant’s assumptions. It is important to note that warehousing has the lowest parking requirement of any use in code. This means that if the uses differ significantly from the mix projected by the applicant, the amount of parking would no longer meet minimum requirements. The proposed development occupies almost the entirety of the buildable portion of the site. There is almost no opportunity to construct additional parking, although the applicant has indicated that there is also flexibility to convert some of the loading dock area into additional employee parking. Staff recommends a condition that warehousing occupy a minimum of the percentages of each tenant space noted above. Other uses may only be permitted with approval by City staff that sufficient parking will be provided in addition to any approval process required by code. Staff also recommends a condition noting that any shortage of parking is fully based upon the actions of the applicant and shall not be used as justification for any future variance request. Lighting The City’s lighting ordinance requires light trespass to be no more than 0.3 FC at property lines, and 0.0 FC at residential districts (eastern property line) and that lighting be downcast. The applicant has submitted a lighting and photometric plan that appear to meet these requirements. Office Warehouse Building 1 18,900 s.f. (15%) 107,100 s.f. (85%) Building 2 17,850 s.f. (20%) 70,150 s.f. (80%) Building 3 18,200 s.f. (10%) 163,800 s.f. (90%) Total 54,950 s.f. 341,050 s.f. Office 1 stall per 250 s.f. 54,950 s.f. (13.9%) 220 stalls Warehouse 1 stall per employee or 1 stall per 2000 s.f. 341,050 s.f. (86.1%) 171 stalls (171 employees max) Total 391 stalls Loram/Scannell Page 12 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Tree Preservation The subject property is almost entirely farmed or wetlands. There are a small number of trees along the edge of the field. Staff recommends that information be provided on the existing trees and removal. Replacement likely will be required but will probably be a small number compared to landscaping requirements. Landscaping The IP district includes the following landscape requirements: • Street Trees – not less than one tree per 50 feet, or fraction thereof, of street frontage The subject site includes 777 feet of frontage along Arrowhead Drive, which would require a minimum of 16 trees along the frontage. The applicant proposes 25 trees along the frontage of Arrowhead Drive, mostly clustered to the north and south. A total of 181 trees are proposed, mostly lining the north and south property lines. • Open Space Trees – Complement form and function of open spaces Very little open space is proposed to remain on the site with the exception of stormwater basin or unimpacted wetland, so opportunities for planting is limited. • Building Setting - At least 15 feet of landscaped area shall be provided adjacent to all buildings except for walks, plaza space and approved loading docks. The applicant proposes 15 feet between the parking lot and buildings. It appears approximately half of this area is proposed for sidewalk and half for landscaping. Staff recommends that sidewalk width be minimized as much as possible to increase the area for landscaping. • Parking lot landscaping – minimum of 5% of the interior of surface parking lot area; islands every 20 spaces Staff has calculated that approximately 6% of the parking lot includes landscaping and required landscaping islands are provided. Stormwater The applicant proposes a biofiltration basin east of building 3. The applicant proposes to incorporate iron-enhanced sand media to improve treatment and reduce the footprint of the pond. The City Engineer has reviewed and provided comments and staff recommends a condition that these comments be addressed. The project will also be subject to Elm Creek Watershed review and approval. Sewer/Water Existing sewer and water mains are located within Arrowhead Drive and along the southern property line of the subject property. Staff recommends that the sewer and water lines within the site remain privately owned and operated. The City Engineer has reviewed and provided comments on the utility plans, which staff recommends be addressed. Utilities, Mechanical Equipment, and Trash and Recycling Facilities The IP district requires: • All utilities shall be placed underground. Transformers and similar equipment, if any, should be located inside a building or shall be fully screened from view. Loram/Scannell Page 13 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting • All rooftop equipment shall be designed to minimize undesirable views and forms when viewing rooftops from higher elevations or abutting property. Equipment shall be screened through the use of architectural elements and materials, which are consistent with the design and architecture of the building. Wooden boards or similar material constructed or assembled in a fence-type method or design shall not be used to screen rooftop equipment. • To the extent possible, all mechanical equipment, meters and transformers shall be placed inside the building or in a mechanical court formed by walls which completely enclose and screen the equipment. Utilities serving the site shall be placed underground. No information has been provided on mechanical and utility equipment. Staff recommends that this information be provided consistent with IP standards. All trash and material to be recycled are required to be stored within the principal building, within an accessory structure, or within an enclosed outdoor area adjacent to the principal structure. The applicant has indicated that trash and recycling will be within the building. EV Preparedness The City recently adopted an ordinance which requires applicants to describe Electric Vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure preparedness or implementation is proposed. The applicant has identified approximately 20% of the parking spaces as “EV-ready.” The applicant intends to install a small amount of charging stations and to install conduit to reduce future costs of installation for the remainder. Outdoor Storage The applicant proposes two outside storage areas adjacent to the rear of the building on Lot 2. Outside storage is not proposed on Lots 1 or 3 and is not permitted without specific review. The following summarized the IP requirements and proposed condition in italics • Minimum lot size 5 acres – Lot 2 is 5.07 acres in size • Storage may not exceed 20% of the footprint of building – the applicant proposes 15% (approximately 13,200 square feet) • Identified on site plan • Screened from view – the storage area is proposed within the loading dock courtyard, and is screened from north, west, and south by buildings. The eastern end of the courtyard proposes coniferous trees adjacent to loading docks and overstory trees to the east. • Materials stored on improved surface – storage area is concrete • Adjacent to rear of building • Height of storage not to exceed 10 feet. Staff recommends this as a condition. Conditional Use Permit – Warehouse Warehousing/Distributorship is a conditional use within the IP zoning district. Conditional Use Permits (CUPs) are subject to specific requirements for each use which are above the general zoning requirements, and also subject to a general set of criteria for all CUPs. Loram/Scannell Page 14 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting The following specific standard is described in the IP district for warehousing: “Parking and truck configuration may require additional consideration.” Hennepin County has recommended that the existing Loram access north of the subject site be used as the main entrance for trucks. Staff recommends a condition requiring signage and other practices to direct as much of the truck traffic to that location as possible. Staff believes that the loading dock courtyard between the three buildings as proposed should help limit the impact of truck circulation to a great degree. General CUP Standards Following are the general CUP standards from Section 825.39 of the zoning code, along with potential finding on each: Subd. 1. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity. Subject to the conditions recommended, staff does not believe these will be a concern. Subd. 2. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area. Staff does not believe the CUP will impede development. Subd. 3. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. These matters are discussed above, and subject to the conditions recommended, staff believes they will be addressed. Subd. 4. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide sufficient off-street parking and loading space to serve the proposed use. These matters are discussed above. Based upon projected primary warehouse use, parking appears sufficient. Parking would need to be reviewed before other uses are conducted on the property. Subd. 5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise and vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance, and to control lighted signs and other lights in such a manner that no disturbance to neighboring properties will result. Subject to the conditions recommended, staff does not believe these will be a concern. Subd. 6. The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. The uses are all permitted in the zoning district. Subd. 7. The use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. The uses are all permitted in the zoning district. Loram/Scannell Page 15 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Subd. 8. The use is not in conflict with the policies plan of the City. Staff does not believe the proposed CUP would conflict with the policies of the City. Subd. 9. The use will not cause traffic hazard or congestion. Subject to construction of the turn lane on Arrowhead Drive, staff believes this would be achieved. Subd. 10. Existing businesses nearby will not be adversely affected by intrusion of noise, glare or general unsightliness. Subject to the conditions recommended, staff does not believe these will be a concern. Subd. 11. The developer shall submit a time schedule for completion of the project. The applicant is attempting to commence site work during the 2023. The timeline for building 3 would be based upon uptake of building 1. Staff recommends that the site plan review be valid for a no longer than a period of three years. Subd. 12. The developer shall provide proof of ownership of the property to the Zoning Officer. Loram is listed as the owner of the property. Planning Commission Recommendation The purpose of a Site Plan Review is to review compliance with relevant land use regulations. If the proposed construction meets the requirements, it should be approved. The City can apply conditions as necessary to ensure compliance with City requirements. The Planning Commission reviewed the request at its October 2022 meeting. An excerpt from the meeting minutes is attached for reference. The Commission recommended approval on a 4-2 vote. The two Commissioners who voted against the recommendation believed the wetland impacts should be reduced and buffers provided, and did not raise other objections. The City Council reviewed the wetland impacts and approved of the wetland conservation act request. Staff has identified various conditions to ensure compliance with City requirements. Subject to the following conditions be addressed, staff recommends approval of the Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit 1) The Site Plan Review and CUP shall be contingent upon plat approval. 2) The Site Plan Review and CUP shall be contingent upon implementation of the Wetland Replacement Plan related to the proposed wetland impacts. 3) The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated 11/22/2022 except as may be modified herein. The design of all improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing construction. 4) The Applicant shall abide by the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance, including installation of vegetative buffers, recordation of easements, and installation of signage. 5) It is acknowledged that proposed parking is intended to accommodate warehousing as the principal and predominant use. Other uses shall not exceed 15% of building 1, 20% of building 2, or 10% of building 3 unless the applicant has provided evidence satisfactory to City staff, that adequate parking exists for the use. Loram/Scannell Page 16 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting 6) It is acknowledged that the amount of parking, anticipated site layout, and projected uses on the site result from direct action of the Owner for the sake of any future variance request. 7) No loading docks shall be permitted within 300 feet of the eastern property line of Lot 3. Based upon the footprint of the building shown on the plans dated 11/22/2022, no loading dock shall be permitted on the eastern 50 feet of the building. 8) The Applicant shall increase landscaping adjacent to the buildings, including through reducing sidewalk width to the extent possible. 9) All parking lot and landscape lighting shall be downcast and shielded. 10) The Applicant shall provide information on transformer, meter, and HVAC equipment and provide screening measures for review and approval. Any rooftop equipment shall be screened with elements which are compatible with the architectural design of the building, to the satisfaction of City staff. 11) All comments from the Elm Creek Watershed District shall be addressed. 12) All comments from the City Engineer shall be addressed. 13) All trash and recycling shall be stored within the buildings. If storage is proposed outside the building, location and enclosure shall be submitted for review and approved by staff for consistency with IP standards prior to storing outside. 14) Outside storage shall be limited to the areas identified on the site plan within the loading dock area of Lot 2. No outdoor storage shall be permitted on Lots 1 or 3 unless specifically proposed and approved by the City as part of a Site Plan Review. The height of the storage shall not exceed 10 feet. 15) The Applicant shall update plans to identify bicycle storage areas. 16) The Applicant shall install signage and take other measures to encourage trucks and most vehicles to utilize the northern shared access. 17) The site plan review approval shall be effective for one year and thereafter shall be considered null and void. Site plan approval for Building 3 shall be effective for three years. 18) The Applicant shall obtain necessary permits from the City, Hennepin County, Elm Creek Watershed, Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Council, and any other relevant agency prior to commencing construction activity on the Property. 19) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, site plan review, and related documents. Potential Action Staff described the findings/criteria for preliminary plat review on page 7 and for conditional use permit approval on pages 14-15. If the Council finds that, subject to relevant conditions, the proposed plat does not meet the findings, that the Site Plan meets relevant City requirements and that the specific and general CUP criteria noted above have been met, the following action could be taken: Motion to direct staff to prepare resolutions granting preliminary plat, site plan review, and conditional use permit approval, subject to the conditions noted in the staff report [with changes directed by City Council, if any]. Loram/Scannell Page 17 of 17 January 17, 2023 Pre Plat and Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Attachments 1. Excerpt from October 2022 Planning Commission meeting minutes 2. Excerpt from Park Commission meeting 3. Engineering Comments 4. Applicant parking narrative 5. Preliminary Plat received by City on 12/27/2022 6. Civil Plans dated 11/21/2022 (Landscape plan updated 12/27/2022) 7. Architectural Plans Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 10/11/2022 Minutes 1 2. Public Hearing – Scannell Properties/Loram – Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review for Subdivision of Three Lots and Development of Approximately 396,000 SF of Warehouse/Office/Industrial – East of Arrowhead Drive, South of Highway 55 (PIDs 1111823220003 and 1111823230001) Finke stated that supplemental information has been provided since the last review of the Commission related to reduced wetland impacts, wetland buffer averaging, and landscaping. He stated that the related plans have not yet been updated as they wanted to gain input from the Commission and Council prior to updating those related plans. He stated that additional land was added into the site to reduce the hardcover percentage. He reviewed the additional landscaping that has been provided along with the additional architectural materials and details that were added. He stated that even though the wetland impacts were reduced, there would still be 1.22 acres of impact. He noted again that with the additional land that was added, the applicant was able to get under the hardcover threshold. He stated that information has been provided by the applicant on their projection for the parking need. He stated that this would appear to meet the minimum parking requirements, but staff has concerns with a lack of space for proof of parking, should that become an issue. He noted that the applicant stated that if there was a use that needed additional parking, it would most likely not need the same space for loading docks and that could then be converted to parking. He stated that staff suggests memorialization of the uses as proposed in order to ensure there would continue to be sufficient parking. Popp referenced the wetland to the west next to Arrowhead, identified as wetland eight, and asked how much of that wetland would be impacted. A representative for the applicant replied that impact was noted as about 20,000 square feet, which is about half of that wetland. Jacob asked if there is aquatic life or vegetation that would be an area of concern. Finke replied that a function and values assessment of the wetlands was done, and the western wetland was identified as a manage three, which is on the lower end, whereas the eastern wetland was higher but did not believe it housed any noted species. Jacob commented that most of the wetlands are dry today. Phil Homan, CEO of Loram, stated that he is also a citizen of Medina. He referenced the feedback that was received in the prior review and noted that they made changes to the plan to address those concerns. He stated that they have also had a few meetings with the TEP related to the wetlands. He stated that he has worked at Loram for almost 30 years and the company has been a good corporate citizen of Medina since the late 1960s. He stated that the subject property was acquired in the 1980s for strategic growth opportunities in the future. He stated that the land was rented to farmers in the past and a portion was sold to the MotorPlex development. He stated that in the last 50 years they have completed four additions to the existing building and ran out of room on that parcel for additional expansion. He stated that they currently lease space in several warehouse facilities in the metro area and this expansion would allow Loram to consolidate those leased spaces onto this parcel. He stated that while Loram has locations across the world and in the U.S., they consider Medina to be home. He stated that his office window stares out at what would be the northern portion of this proposed development. He stated that he also owns a unit in the MotorPlex, therefore he will see the development from all sides. He stated that as a citizen of Medina he would not promote a project that he does not believe will be a good fit for Medina. He noted that the principal of Scannell also happens to be a Medina resident, therefore there are two partners in the project that have a vested Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 10/11/2022 Minutes 2 interest in Medina. He stated that they have held this land for some time and now have a need to use it. He stated that this also provides an opportunity to capitalize on the interest in this area of the metro and provide space for another user. He stated that they would have liked to move forward earlier but the construction season has passed and therefore they would like to move forward with construction in the spring. Piper asked if Loram would be using buildings one and two with future development by others. Homan commented that Loram would fully occupy building two which would be primarily warehouse needs. He stated that building one would be constructed at the same time and they would intend to attract likeminded vendors of theirs, as that would lead to more efficient operations. Piper referenced the future development by others area and asked if the ownership of that property would remain the same. Homan stated that Loram would completely own lot two but would share ownership with Scannell of the other two lots. He stated that buildings one and two would be constructed at the same time and building three would be constructed in the future based on market demand. Piper asked who the City would deal with when there are plans for that property. Homan stated that the development will be as proposed but building three would be more dependent on the tenant that comes forward similar to the Oppidan request prior to this case. He confirmed that all buildings would look and feel the same to match the campus. Finke replied that the plat would be laid out with the separate lot and the site plan review would include all three buildings. He stated that if the third building came forward in the next four years, it could proceed to permit as presented in these plans. Ashley Pane, wetland professional at Kimley-Horn, stated that they have reviewed multiple concepts for this site before deciding on the site plan as proposed. She noted that they began with delineation in summer of 2021 and provided details on the wetlands on the site. She stated that they provided a full wetland avoidance concept which had one building that would not impact wetlands but noted that does not meet the needs of the applicant. She also reviewed the two-building scenario which would also not meet the needs of the applicant and would still have wetland impacts with the docks visible from Arrowhead. She stated that this project included an EAW, and a negative declaration was issued by the City Council earlier this year which included a concept with larger buildings and 2.3 acres of wetland impacts. She stated that the comments from the concept from the City and other agencies included a desire for a reduced size and wetland impact. She reviewed the different concepts that were reviewed after that time that included three buildings and attempted to reduce the scale and impacts to wetlands. She stated that their proposal would avoid the highest quality portion of the wetland and they would also propose to create additional wetland along Arrowhead to replace some of what would be lost. She noted that about the same area of wetland would be provided along Arrowhead. She stated that the applicant would also purchase bank credits at a 2:1 ratio to mitigate the loss of the remainder of the wetlands that would be impacted. She noted that the applicant would not request credit for the additional wetland created along Arrowhead Drive, that would simply be done in addition. Brian Wurdeman, Kimley-Horn, stated that they have added bike parking for each of the buildings, enhanced pedestrian connectivity between each of the buildings, added EV ready parking areas, and adding additional landscaping along Arrowhead Drive. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 10/11/2022 Minutes 3 Scott Moe, Scannell Properties, stated that Loram needs to expand, and the other two buildings would be a joint investment between Loram and Scannell. He stated that the building closest to Arrowhead would attract a higher finish user and provided examples. He stated that smaller tenants would be attracted to the first building and believed that could be a combination of Loram vendors/suppliers and others. He stated that the building fronting Arrowhead would completely screen the courtyard for trucks. He stated that this project would benefit Loram and the other businesses, increase the tax base, bring in employment options, and improve the aesthetic along Arrowhead Drive. He commented that the wetland authorities have done a great job on this proposal, and he acknowledged the importance of wetlands. He stated that the wetland entity has limitations on how flexible they can be as they view a wetland as a wetland, whereas most of these wetlands are dry and farmed. He noted that they would be replacing these low-quality wetlands with higher quality wetlands of a ratio of 2:1, along with increasing the wetland value near Arrowhead. Nielsen opened the public hearing at 8:57 p.m. Phil Holman, 150 Sunrise Court, stated that this property is bordered by Loram, the MotorPlex, a swamp, land purchased by the School District, and additional land with a purpose to be determined. He noted that this is an opportunity for Loram to pick its neighbors and stated that not one residential property would be impacted. He stated that he could not think of a more perfect spot in Medina to place this type of development. He stated that he has also had a meeting with the religious institution that is being constructed in this area in attempt to be a good neighbor and that organization had no issues. He stated that they also had a similar conversation with the MotorPlex that also did not have any concerns. He commented that there are businesses in Hamel that are outgrowing their space, and this could be an option for those businesses to locally relocate which would free up space in Hamel as well. Piper asked what will be done with the property at the corner of Arrowhead and Hamel. Homan replied that Mayor Martin and Finke met with him recently. He stated that their intention would be to move the activity from that site to building one which would orphan that piece of property for them. He stated that would leave the property available for redevelopment or sale. He stated that their vision for that five acres would be to have it redeveloped into something more appropriate. Nielsen closed the public hearing at 9:00 p.m. Popp stated that in reviewing the report there was one thing that jumped out, the statement from the TEP that the applicant has not taken sufficient effort to avoid wetland impacts. He referenced a two- building concept that was included in the review from the applicant tonight that would have less wetland impact. He stated that Loram is a successful business in the community, and he wants to support this project but also wants to understand why the two-building option would not be feasible as there is similar square footage between the two building and three building concepts and similar distances between the buildings. He stated that the wetland creation sounds wonderful and seems to offset a large amount of the wetland impacts. He stated that if the 2:1 mitigation credits would be purchased and additional wetland would be created, he would be more supportive of the request. Rhem commented that if the screening were not provided by building one, the City would likely request additional screening. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 10/11/2022 Minutes 4 Finke stated that the wetland itself is subject to Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) rules and there is a minimum buffer required adjacent to the wetlands. He stated that part of the mitigation area would be protected greenspace which would be similar to the created wetlands. Piper commented that she supports the request and did not see a reason to deny the request. Rhem commended the development team for answering the questions he had during the last review related to the wetlands, mitigation and steps that have been taken in an attempt to avoid those impacts. He stated that he now feels that he has a better understanding and supports the request. Grajczyk also commended Kimley-Horn for the presentation and review that has been completed for this process. He stated that he also supports Loram and the desired expansion. He commented that these are farmed and low-quality wetlands and because all options have been reviewed, he can support this plan. Jacob agreed that he likes the plan and wished the applicant well. Nielsen stated that she disagrees with the comments of the Commission. She appreciated all that has gone into the design and attempts to address the feedback from the last review. She did not see a need for lot three as there is not a need for that at this time. She noted that she also does not see a need for building one, although there are ideas for that use. She stated that she prefers a two-building concept. She acknowledged that a wetland is a wetland and did not want this request to set precedent and therefore will not support this request. Wurdeman stated that Hennepin County has reviewed this and wants the majority of the traffic to come from the north, therefore the length of the building in the two-building concept would limit the ability for access, to get parked vehicles along the frontage, and would impact traffic flow. He stated that the truck movements would also be difficult to get around that building. Finke commented that with roadway extensions the southern access point would be in play, even though Hennepin County prefers the northern access. Homan stated that they are going to be moving equipment and material between the existing building and the new building. He noted that the ownership of the new buildings will also be different and therefore combining uses would make that difficult. He explained that moving equipment and material between facilities that goes through traffic, parking and pedestrian areas would also not be safe. He stated that in the discussions with the TEP there was an agreed need for 380,000 square feet but the TEP did not agree that there was a need for 396,000 square feet and therefore there seems to be incongruity in how the need is established. He stated that they will be investing $40,000,000 into this project and he would not be doing that if there was not a need. He stated that the TEP agreed to impacts of .76 acres of wetlands but not with 1.22 acres. He stated that they are creating three acres of wetlands that do not exist today with their mitigation credits. He stated that the TEP provided their preference without expressing that in a meeting with them. He noted that the preferred option of the TEP does not meet the County requirement, nor does it meet his needs as the business. He stated that their proposed request is roughly the same as the preferred option of the TEP. Finke stated that offsite mitigation always requires 2:1 replacement. Motion by Rhem, seconded by Jacob, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and site plan review subject to the conditions within the staff report. Motion carries 4 – 2 (Popp and Nielsen opposed). Medina Park Commission Excerpt from 8/17/2022 Minutes 1 LORAM/SCANNELL – Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review for Industrial Development Planning Director presented the project. The project would of three lots with approximately 400,000 square feet of floor area. Finke noted that the Parks plan identifies a future park on property east of the large wetland but staff believes that park was more suitable for property east of the wetland. Finke noted that Hennepin County has recommended that the trail along Arrowhead be shifted to the east. Staff recommended requiring a 12’ trail easement to accommodate the relocation, but that staff did not recommend requiring reconstruction. If the trail needed to be relocated for Hennepin County to widen the roadway, staff believes Hennepin County ought to pay for the relocation. Finke stated that the applicant owns additional property within and to the east of the large wetland that they may need to add to the development because their proposal is currently over the maximum hardcover allowance. Finke stated that the Diamond Lake Regional Trail Master Plan showed the preferred route near the future intersection of Tamarack Drive and Highway 55. If the applicant adds the additional property to the plat, staff would suggest additional land dedication east of the wetland for the Regional Trail. Finke noted that the applicant has requested that the City consider the fact that they have granted trail easements on this site and in front of their facility to the north. Finke stated that the 12’ easement along Arrowhead on the subject site would be approximately 9.7% of the property the City could require. If the Commission supported providing some consideration for the trail granted on the property to the north, this would be approximately 7% of the land which could be required. Hutchinson made a motion to recommend dedication of the 12’ easement adjacent to Arrowhead Drive and cash-in-lieu of additional dedication and to further recommend land dedication for the Diamond Lake trail if the property to the east is added to the application. Sharp seconded the motion. Carries unanimously. K:\020306-000\Admin\Docs\2022-11-21 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-12-19 Loram-Scannell Office-Warehouse Project - WSB Engineering Comments.docx 70 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | SU I T E 3 0 0 | M I N N E A P O L I S , M N | 55 4 1 6 | 76 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | W S B E N G . C O M December 19, 2022 Mr. Dusty Finke City Planning Director City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: Loram/Scannell Office/Warehouse Project – Final Plat & Plan Review City Project No. LR-22-318 WSB Project No. 020306-000 Dear Mr. Finke: WSB staff have reviewed the Loram/Scannell Office/Warehouse Final Plat & Civil Plans submitted to the City on November 21, 2022. The applicant proposes to construct a total of three office/warehouse buildings by combining two parcels totaling 25.1 acres. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina’s general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. Final Plat & General Comments 1. The City Planner will provide comments pertaining to the proposed landscaping, overall trail/pedestrian access, and tree preservation plan under separate cover. Acknowledged by applicant. 2. The preliminary plat is hard to read with all of the infrastructure/grading shown. Provide a cleaner version for review. Show proposed drainage and utility easements. Plat cleaned up but provide dimensions of utility easements to the property lines in various locations. 3. With final plat submittal, provide a sheet with hatching for differing pavement types (streets, concrete walk, bituminous trails, etc.). Provide signing and striping sheet(s). Confirm whether or not there will be a monument sign. Revised site plan submitted, but monument sign said to be constructed by others and by the contractor; clarify what is being proposed. 4. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building structures as required by the City Fire Marshall. The Fire Marshall will review and provide comments under separate cover. In-progress, awaiting Fire Marshall review. 5. In order to calculate a letter of credit and construction engineering escrow amounts for the final development agreement, an engineer’s estimate (in Excel format) of the proposed utility improvements (watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, ponding, etc.) and a schedule for completion of construction will be required. The estimate should also include the cost of landscaping items. 6. Any work within Hennepin County right of way will require a permit. The applicant shall also meet the requirements of the County’s plat review committee. Acknowledged by applicant. City of Medina – Loram/Scannell Office/Warehouse Project Final Plat – Engineering Review December19, 2022 Page 2 K:\020306-000\Admin\Docs\2022-11-21 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-12-19 Loram-Scannell Office-Warehouse Project - WSB Engineering Comments.docx 7. Additional comments have been provided directly on the plan sheets. Not all comments on the plans have been summarized in this review letter. Existing Site & Demolition Plan (Sheet C200 – C204) 8. Confirm whether additional removals within Arrowhead Drive for the watermain connection to the north will be needed due to proximity of connection to the edge of roadway. Watermain shown as 8’ from back of curb. Note, to protect back of curb during construction. Complete. 9. The existing site and demolition plans will also need to include existing utility locations, pipe sizes, pipe material types, etc. Show more of the watermain along Arrowhead Drive. Make sure the text shows up on each of the sheets/views, move text so that it is not on top of linework and is readily legible. Complete. 10. Additional comments: · Show additional existing contour information north of the site on sheet 202 to demonstrate construction limits and locations to match into existing grades · Show additional construction limits caused by connecting into the existing sanitary sewer. · Show additional construction limits caused by connecting into the existing watermain to the south. o Note that the existing hydrant lead will need to be removed back to and including the 8” to 6” reducer. · Pavement removal/replacement will need to be done to half/full road widths. · Show removing/abandoning the existing 6” water stub along Arrowhead per City requirements Erosion/Sediment Control, SWPPP Plans, & Details (Sheets C300 – C312) 11. The proposed project will disturb more than one acre. Develop and include a SWPPP consistent with the MPCA CSWGP with future plan submittals. SWPPP shall include all requirements in the Construction Stormwater General permit section 5.3-5.26. Complete. 12. Provide a location map of the project site with a one mile radius showing all discharge locations and adjacent water bodies. Complete. 13. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. 14. A more detailed review of erosion/sediment control will be conducted with the final construction plan submittal. Site Plan (Sheets C401 – C404) 15. The City Planner will provide comments pertaining to the proposed landscaping, pedestrian access/mobility, and tree preservation plan under separate cover. Acknowledged by applicant. City of Medina – Loram/Scannell Office/Warehouse Project Final Plat – Engineering Review December19, 2022 Page 3 K:\020306-000\Admin\Docs\2022-11-21 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-12-19 Loram-Scannell Office-Warehouse Project - WSB Engineering Comments.docx 16. Typical pavement sections were provided on the plan. The final pavement section shall be designed by a registered geotechnical engineer for the specific soil conditions found on the site. Provide geotechnical report with future submittals. Geotechnical report with paving designs provided. Typical pavement sections were not included with this submittal. Several detail pages included with the previous submittal were not included with this one (Sheets C3.11, C4.06, C4.07, C5.06, etc.). Complete. 17. Additional comments: · Show additional hatching for storage areas in legend or label on plans · Show additional restoration limits caused by connecting into the existing sanitary sewer. · Show additional construction limits caused by connecting into the existing watermain to the south. · Pavement removal/replacement will need to be done to half/full road widths. · The pedestrian ramps at the northwestern entrance are offset across the road · The stop sign and stop bar at the northwestern entrance are past and allow traffic through the path of the sidewalk. · Provide beaver tail transitions at the ends of the curb at the northeastern entrance Grading, Drainage, and Storm Sewer Plans (Sheets C500 – C504) 18. Provide and note EOF locations for all low points inside and outside the roadway. Provide EOF arrows with highpoint/EOF elevations at locations on plans. Some CBMHs are shown as having EOFs that are lower than their rim elevations. Improved but several low points exist without EOFs identified or the wrong EOFs identified and several highpoints or breaks in the grades of the street are not identified particularly near intersections 19. With final plat submittal provide the following: a. In general maintain all surface grades within the minimum of 2.0% and maximum 33% slopes. Vegetated swale grades shall also be a minimum of 2.0%. Some areas identified as being greater than 3:1 or less than 2%. Improved but some remain – see redline comments b. Drainage arrows on plans showing direction of runoff. Note specifically high points between each side-yard swale. Improved but more are needed. c. Include percent slope In all other swale locations and verify that it meets the City requirement of 2%. See western swales along Arrowhead Drive. Complete, the swales along Arrowhead drive were replaced with lowland area. d. Add rip-rap quantities and class notes at each flared end section and pond overflows (if applicable). e. Note the size of proposed storm sewer structures. i. Provide pipe sizes and directions corresponding to invert elevations ii. Match crowns or 0.8 flow lines of pipes 20. At the southeasterly portion of the site, there is a portion proposed to be graded toward the adjacent property to the south. At this location, the parking lot could overflow into the greenspace; this area needs to be graded to drain in the easterly direction and not into the adjacent property. A swale has been constructed to direct this drainage somewhat to the east before discharging to the wetlands to the southeast. See additional comments on redline plan set City of Medina – Loram/Scannell Office/Warehouse Project Final Plat – Engineering Review December19, 2022 Page 4 K:\020306-000\Admin\Docs\2022-11-21 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-12-19 Loram-Scannell Office-Warehouse Project - WSB Engineering Comments.docx Utility Plan (Sheets C600 – C603) General: 21. There is landscaping/trees located over and/or too close to existing/proposed sanitary and storm sewer lines. These will need to be moved to provide greater clearance for maintenance purposes. 22. On the legend for the utility plans add the linetype for the drainage and utility easements. 23. Watermain shall be encompassed by drainage and utility easements where located outside of public road right of way. Drainage and utility easements will need to allow for a 1:1 trench from the invert of the utility with a minimum of 20’ centered on the utility. The City will not require easements for the sanitary sewer within the site. Twenty-foot (20’) easements were provided over all watermain. The City will provide guidance whether all valves (including service valves) and hydrants need to be encompassed by drainage and utility easement. Increase easement as necessary. The City will require that all valves are encompassed within drainage and utility easements, see markups on the plans. 24. At the southeasterly portion of the site along the property line, extend the watermain and sewer main east matching the locations proposed by the adjacent property owner. Otherwise, proposed landscaping will be impacted with this connection: Unchanged from prior submittal. 25. Add general notes to the utility plans to the effect of: Complete. a. The City shall not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that are associated with variations in the utility as-built elevations. All utility connections shall be verified in the field. b. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The Owner and Engineer of Record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards. c. All watermain and sanitary sewer testing shall be conducted in accordance with the City standards and specifications. Copies of all test results shall be submitted to the City (Public Works Director, City Engineer), the Owner, and the Engineer of Record. City of Medina – Loram/Scannell Office/Warehouse Project Final Plat – Engineering Review December19, 2022 Page 5 K:\020306-000\Admin\Docs\2022-11-21 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-12-19 Loram-Scannell Office-Warehouse Project - WSB Engineering Comments.docx d. Watermain shall have a minimum cover of 7.5’. e. The City will require televising for sanitary sewer pipe installations prior to accepting a warranty for the utility system; provide report and video files to the City for review. f. Tracer wire installation shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the MN Rural Water Association Standards. See these standards for further details. 26. With final plat submittal provide the following: a. Provide dimension notes from watermain to parallel sewer mains (storm and sanitary sewer); the minimum horizontal separation between mains is 10 feet. Where watermain crosses storm or sanitary sewer, add a note at each location to the effect of “Maintain 18” Minimum Separation, 4” Rigid Insulation” on both the plan view and profile view locations (both utility and storm sewer sheets). Acknowledged by applicant, to be submitted with future plat updates. Complete. Watermain: 27. Watermain looping connections will be needed to minimize long dead-end watermain sections. Consideration of further watermain looping needs and stubs for future phases or other adjacent developments may be required and reviewed with future submittals. Complete. 28. Hydrant locations shall be approved of by the Fire Marshal; typically, a maximum of 250’ influence radius (approximately 400’ spacing) is required to serve the immediate residential areas. Provide an exhibit showing hydrant influence spacing. In-progress, awaiting Fire Marshall review. 29. The watermain connections to the building(s) shall be reviewed and approved by the City Fire Marshall. Show the location of the PIV and curb stop location on the plan(s). The City requires that domestic and fire services are separate taps from the main. A separate curb stop is required for the domestic service and gate valve (PIV) for the fire line. In- progress, awaiting Fire Marshall review. 30. The City will require that the watermain is connected to the existing watermain along the southerly property line as opposed to a separate connection within Arrowhead Drive. It is anticipated that the property owner/developer for the property to the southeast will be extending the watermain further east; a connection to the easterly end of this future stub should be made into the Loram property. Complete. 31. Hydrants and adjacent valves should be located and fully encompassed within curbed islands. Gate valves symbols shifted to islands or notes added but confirm there is enough clearance to the back of curb for constructability; some appear to be too close. Sanitary Sewer: 32. The City will require that the sewer main is connected to the existing main along the southerly property line as opposed to making a separate connection within Arrowhead Drive. Complete. Construction Notes & Standard Details Plans (Sheets C100, C405 – C407, C505 – C506, C605 – C607) 33. Provide specific details for the proposed stormwater treatment areas. City of Medina – Loram/Scannell Office/Warehouse Project Final Plat – Engineering Review December19, 2022 Page 6 K:\020306-000\Admin\Docs\2022-11-21 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-12-19 Loram-Scannell Office-Warehouse Project - WSB Engineering Comments.docx 34. Provide specific details for each of the control structures proposed. 35. A full review of standard details will be conducted with the final plat submittal. Complete. 36. Provide standard/typical details for the proposed retaining walls on the plans. Walls greater than 4.0’ in height will need to be designed by a registered structural engineer and subject to review by the City’s building official. Provide a separate plan set for the wall design (those greater than 4’ in height). Traffic & Access 37. The Site Plan shows a new access on the east side of the site to the property to the north across a railroad spur. Who will be using this access and how will it impact the circulation of both sites? 38. An evaluation of turn lane needs for the access on Arrowhead Drive (CSAH 118) shall be provided based on the Hennepin County Comment from the EAW “County guidelines based partially on MnDOT, FHWA, etc. best practices recommends turn lanes in both directions for access(es) with these many projected trips” and the Developer response in the EAW “Turn lane needs will be evaluated based upon final site layout and required if necessary”. 39. Hennepin County approval and permit will be required for the access to Arrowhead Drive (CSAH 118) and working in the County right-of-way. Acknowledged by the applicant. 40. Provide a figure showing truck movements throughout the site including the largest truck and the largest fire truck. Driveways and circulation routes shall be designed to accommodate these vehicles. Stormwater Management 41. The applicant will need to submit a Stormwater Management Plan and modeling consistent with Medina’s Stormwater Design Manual. Complete. 42. The development will need to meet the City’s volume control requirement to capture and retain onsite 1.1” of runoff from the net new impervious surface. By satisfying the volume requirement the water quality requirement is considered met. Follow the City’s Stormwater Design Manual for alternative credits towards the volume requirement if infiltration is not feasible. Complete. 43. The development will need to meet the City’s rate control requirement, which states that post development discharge rates must be less than or equal to existing conditions discharge rates. Complete. 44. The applicant may want to consider using the stormwater ponds for irrigation. Credits for volume control can be given for stormwater reuse. City ordinance does not allow for municipal water system to be used for irrigation. Complete. f. Provide additional details for the water reuse system. Along with a map showing the irrigatable areas. Complete. g. Required design submittal packages for water reuse BMPs must include: Complete. i. An analysis using Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District Stormwater Reuse Calculator. An example of the Calculator can be City of Medina – Loram/Scannell Office/Warehouse Project Final Plat – Engineering Review December19, 2022 Page 7 K:\020306-000\Admin\Docs\2022-11-21 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-12-19 Loram-Scannell Office-Warehouse Project - WSB Engineering Comments.docx found in Appendix E. The full spreadsheet can be requested from the City. ii. Documentation demonstrating adequacy of soils, storage system, and delivery system iii. Operations and maintenance plan. The O& M plan should follow the guidelines listed in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. iv. Approved capacity of an irrigation practice will be based on: 1. An irrigation rate of 1.0 inches per week over the irrigated pervious area(s) or the rate identified through the Stormwater Reuse Calculator (whichever is less); or as approved by the City 2. No greater than a 26 week (April 15th to October 15th) growing season. v. Design of the irrigation system must include, but is not limited to, the following items. Each system will be reviewed and approved by the City on a site-by-site basis. 1. Plumbing code review, adherence, and permitting, if applicable. 2. Water reuse pump system design including supply line, intake, meter, and pump 3. Electrical and controls design 4. Construction drawings, specifications, and system integration vi. Two (2) feet of permanent pool from the bottom of the pond must be maintained following drawdown for irrigation. Stormwater Design Manual City of Medina, MN WSB Project No. 011705-000 Page 20 5. Use rates should be monitored at least monthly for at least three years. This should be compared to the water budget analysis of the design to determine whether the modeled level of performance is being achieved. 45. The City requires two feet of freeboard from structure low openings to 100-year high water levels and EOF’s. Provide maintenance access to all ponding facilities. Complete. 46. The development will need to meet the appropriate watershed standards for Elm Creek Water Management Commission and the applicant shall submit for the required permits. In-progress, awaiting final permit documents from applicant. 47. The proposed drainage exhibit in the stormwater report shows differed drainage area number than the existing drainage area for the site. 25.65 ac existing and 25.69. Explain difference in drainage area and any offsite drainage that could account for the difference. Provide an updated stormwater narrative that reflects all changes in acreage, drainage areas, and HWL. Complete. 48. Stormwater Pond 8P shows different HWL elevations in the grading detail on sheet C506 than on the plan set and in the hydroCAD modeling. Confirm HWL and confirm all elevations match. Complete. 49. Provide additional pretreatment in conformance with the City Design Manual. Provide 4’ sump structures prior to discharge into the basin for pretreatment. Complete. 50. Adjacent wetland shows a OHWL of 988.8. The pond is shown to have a bottom of 984.20. Provide a clay liner to ensure that there is separation from the pond and wetland. Complete. City of Medina – Loram/Scannell Office/Warehouse Project Final Plat – Engineering Review December19, 2022 Page 8 K:\020306-000\Admin\Docs\2022-11-21 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-12-19 Loram-Scannell Office-Warehouse Project - WSB Engineering Comments.docx h. Stormwater basin could have potential future impacts on hydrology of wetland if they are not separated. i. Attach detail of stormwater pond with Clay liner. 51. Draintile should have a clay liner underneath along with geotextile fabric under the tile. Update plans and standard detail to show this. Complete. j. Filtration shall have 3’ of separation from seasonally saturated ground water. Appears there may be conflict with the adjacent wetland, leading to inundation and maintenance issues. k. Provide drain tile location on plan sheet including clean outs. 52. Provide a standard detail for draintile cleanouts. Complete. l. Call out locations of cleanouts on the grading plan to ensure future maintenance and access. 53. Include an stabilized EOF showing grades and location on the grading plan. Complete. 54. Provide designated maintenance access to stormwater BMP’s for future maintenance. Show areas on plan for maintenance and how access will be to the draintile. Complete. m. Filtration bench cannot be used for maintenance access. Wetlands & Environmental 55. Clearly delineate existing wetland boundaries on the plan. Complete. 56. Wetland impacts are referenced on the plan and note “see wetland permit application”. To date, no replacement plan application has been received by the LGU. A No Loss application suggesting incidental wetlands on site is currently under review. A replacement plan must be submitted that clearly documents the purpose and need for the project, avoidance alternatives, and implemented minimization measures. A replacement plan was submitted to the LGU on 7/19/22 and is being reviewed under WCA and city wetland regulations. 57. Wetlands 4 and 5 are DNR Public Waters. A DNR public waters permit may be required for impacts to these wetlands, including any proposed stormwater outfalls and associated riprap. A stormwater structure appears to be proposed within Wetland 4. 58. Wetland buffers are required around the remaining portions of Wetland 8 and the wetland mitigation area. Show wetland buffers on the site plan. Wetland 8 is classified as a Managed 3 wetland which requires an average buffer width of 20 feet (minimum 15 feet). Wetlands created for the purpose of onsite mitigation require a minimum 25-foot buffer per MN Rules 8420.0522 Subpart 6.B. Does not apply – applicant not seeking WCA replacement credit. Wetland buffers should not be proposed in a way that impacts wetland. If the minimum buffer requirements cannot be met while avoiding impacts to the wetland, the design must be modified to allow room for wetland buffer or, if that’s not feasible, a variance should be requested. 59. Provide the wetland buffer seed mix proposed for the site. Complete. 60. Include wetland buffer signage locations on the plan. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or City of Medina – Loram/Scannell Office/Warehouse Project Final Plat – Engineering Review December19, 2022 Page 9 K:\020306-000\Admin\Docs\2022-11-21 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2022-12-19 Loram-Scannell Office-Warehouse Project - WSB Engineering Comments.docx modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards. With future submittals, include a response to the comments in this letter. We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 612-419-1549 if you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet. Sincerely, WSB Jim Stremel, P.E. City Engineer 1 Dusty Finke From:Scott Moe <ScottM@scannellproperties.com> Sent:Thursday, October 6, 2022 10:42 AM To:Phil Homan; Dusty Finke Cc:Wurdeman, Brian Subject:RE: Planning Committee Agenda Solution Builders ‐ ThnAir Warning: Sender ScottM@scannellproperties.com is not yet trusted by your organization. Please be careful before replying or clicking on the URLs. Report Phishing Mark Safe powered by Graphus® Dusty, I’ll speak to buildings 1 & 3 as they are our speculative projects we are JVing with Loram. I’ve been marketing speculative projects for almost 40 years and predicting parking counts is always a challenge, so I respect your request to address the parking. And sure, I’d love to have more parking to cover the outlying/heavy parking user, but the economics of today’s developments don’t allow us the slack to have more than is shown on the plan – and is meeting code. If the rare heavy parking user comes to building 1 we will have to convert some of the truck courtyard area to pedestrian parking, a very common solution BTW. Or we’d have to reduce the size of building #3 and add parking there in the unlikely event the parking numbers were crazy big, but a deal we wanted to do. Building #1 effectively has double row parking across the entire front of the building. The double row of end cap parking effectively makes up for the parking lost due to the “notches” utilized to add more wetland area. For the majority of users, which is who we have to design for, the parking will be adequate and consistent within the market. Regarding building #3 there is no parking issues as we have it designed. Double row parking across the entire front is common and again, will meet the majority of potential users. It’s common for higher employee count manufacturing to utilize a portion of the truck courtyard area for warehouse/manufacturing area employees as they like to utilize back door access. Our current design meets code and I’m very comfortable with the number of stalls in this plan. Respectfully, Scott Moe Director of Development | Scannell Properties Phone: 651.707.5867 scannellproperties.com From: Phil Homan <Phil.J.Homan@loram.com> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2022 10:09 AM To: Dusty Finke <dusty.finke@medinamn.gov> Cc: Scott Moe <ScottM@scannellproperties.com>; Wurdeman, Brian <Brian.Wurdeman@kimley‐horn.com> Subject: RE: Planning Committee Agenda 1 Dusty Finke From:Phil Homan <Phil.J.Homan@loram.com> Sent:Thursday, October 6, 2022 10:09 AM To:Dusty Finke Cc:Scott Moe; Wurdeman, Brian Subject:RE: Planning Committee Agenda Dusty I will comment on Building 2 Since it will be occupied by Loram Day 1. We have 15% designed as office space with some of that being break rooms (12,500SF) We have 5% as a light industrial Lab space (5,000 SF). Total of the above two items is 17,500SF out of the building footprint of 88,000 or 20% which we conservatively accounted for as “office”. The remainder is warehouse and storage and internal truck bays Loram currently has 13 warehouse employees involved in these activities. There may be an addition 10 or so logistics people we move to that site. Loram also has about a dozen or so traveling technicians that would use cube space on that site when they are in town. No parking needed when they are not There may be 5 to 10 people on any given day in the Lab space. Max cube space in our preliminary design is around 50 to 60 if we filled up all potential office space with full time people. I counted 104 parking spaces in front of building 2 so with all the potential possibilities from the above data above I don’t see us running into any issues with regard to parking if we build to this plan. This space will act as overflow space to our existing lot should it be needed. Loram also has space to add additional parking on our existing site if needed. We have been holding off doing that pending the build out of this site since we will destress our existing lot with this capacity. Not sure how this will affect the overall site plan but I see building 2 has excess parking capacity. With regard to our existing site and the OSI site those are primarily office spaces so not sure if it’s a valid comparison to what is proposed here. As a side note many companies are shifting towards remote working and flex time in the post pandemic world. Loram recently instituted a flex work policy whereby people can work remotely around 20% of the time. This also takes pressure off parking. I am currently sending this email from my “Lake office” Wondering how this will affect City codes of the future Happy to answer any other questions I’ll let Scott speak to Buildings 1 and 3. Phil J. Homan | CEO Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. 3900 Arrowhead Drive ● Hamel, MN 55340 Office: 763-478-2246 phil.j.homan@loram.com ● www.loram.com EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY 50' BUILDING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK PROPERTY LINE EX. PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE AR R O W H E A D D R I V E (P U B L I C S T R E E T ) EX. 10' UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED ROW DEDICATION PROPOSED 20' WATERMAIN EASEMENT PROPOSED 20' WATERMAIN EASEMENT LOT 1, BLOCK 1 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 LOT 3, BLOCK 1 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE EX. TRAIL EASEMENT OUTLOT A OUTLOT B 33 . 1 ' 20 . 0 ' 20.0' 31 . 1 ' 20.0' 20.0' 18.1' 20 . 0 ' 32 . 8 ' 20 . 0 ' S70°04'53"E 184.6' N0 ° 0 5 ' 2 4 " W 59 4 . 3 ' N89°37'07"E 25.0' N0°18'53"W 528.0' S0 ° 0 7 ' 4 9 " W 34 8 . 4 ' N0 ° 0 7 ' 4 9 " E 36 0 . 6 ' N0°22'53"W 26.5' N89°39'11"E 685.0' N89°39'34"E 146.7' S0 ° 2 6 ' 0 1 " E 48 1 . 8 ' N89°37'07"E 832.2'N89°37'07"E 420.0' S89°37'07"W 685.0' N0°22'53"W 296.1' S89°37'07"W 182.4'S89°37'07"W 173.5' N0 ° 1 8 ' 5 3 " W 25 0 . 0 ' N89°37'07"E 182.8' S89°37'07"W 419.1' S0 ° 1 8 ' 5 3 " E 77 8 . 0 ' S0 ° 2 2 ' 5 4 " E 45 5 . 8 ' S0°22'54"E 322.2' OWNER: BAPS MINNEAPOLIS MEDINA, LLC OWNER: MATTHEW T HAUGHEY LIVING TR. OWNER: LEGATO CAPITAL LLC OWNER: *DIVISION IN PROCESS OWNER: M ST. P AND S STE M OWNER: LORAM MAINTENANCE OF WAY INC. OWNER: LORAM MAINTENANCE OF WAY INC. OWNER: PUBLIC R.O.W. OWNER: PUBLIC R.O.W. OWNER: INDEPENDENT SCHL DIST 284 PR. 96' PUBLIC R.O.W. 99 0 10 0 0 988 99 2 99 4 99 6 99 8 10 0 2 10 0 4 99 0 99 0 100 0 10 0 0 100 0 1010 98 8 98 8 99 2 99 2 99 2 99 2 99 2 99 2 99 4 99 4 99 6 99 6 99 8 99 8 99 8 99 8 99 8 99 8 10 0 2 100 2 100 2 10 0 4 100 4 100 4 100 6 10 0 6 1006 100 8 10 0 8 1008 99 0 1000 98 8 99 2 994 99 6 99 8 10 0 2 1002100410 0 4 10 0 4 1004 99 0 988 98 8 98 8 98 8 1002 1002 1004 1004 1006 1006 1006 10 0 6 PUBLIC WATER WETLAND BOUNDARY (APPROXIMATE LIMITS) HIGH W A Y 5 5 (PUB L I C S T R E E T ) N0 ° 0 5 ' 2 4 " W 52 9 . 9 ' S69°5 8 ' 5 2 " E 1239 . 0 ' LOT 1, BLOCK 2 PR E P A R E D F O R PR E L I M I N A R Y PL A T C102 M E D I N A IN D U S T R I A L SC A N N E L L M E D I N A M I N N E S O T A DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 8 4 6 0 2 9 12 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 2 AS S H O W N SJ S SJ S BM W Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N CO N C E P T U A L NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NORTH CATCH BASIN ELECTRIC BOX GATE VALVE HYDRANT UTILITY POLE GAS METER SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE LIMITED ACCESS UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD WIRE SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN CULVERT UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATION PROPERTY LINE LEGEND SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE GAS MAIN STORM SEWER GAS EXISTING PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE GATE VALVE HYDRANT TEE REDUCER SANITARY CLEANOUTCO PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 OWNER LORAM MAINTENANCE OF WAY INC P.O. BOX 181 HAMEL, MN 55340 APPLICANT SCANNELL PROPERTIES 294 GROVE LANE, SUITE 140 WAYZATA, MN 55391 CIVIL ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC. BRIAN WURDEMAN, P.E. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 SURVEYOR SUNDE LAND SURVEYING ARLEE CARLSON, P.L.S. 9001 EAST BLOOMINGTON FREEWAY, STE 118 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420 EXISTING SUBJECT SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23 DESCRIBED AS BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH 1 2 OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 1485 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE THEREOF 528 FEET; THENCE WEST PARALLEL TO THE SAID NORTH LINE 1485 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE THEREOF; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE 528 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE SOUTH 250 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PROPOSED SUBJECT SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MEDINA INDUSTRIAL FIRST ADDITION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LOT 2, BLOCK 1, MEDINA INDUSTRIAL FIRST ADDITION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LOT 3, BLOCK 1, MEDINA INDUSTRIAL FIRST ADDITION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA OUTLOT A, MEDINA INDUSTRIAL FIRST ADDITION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA OUTLOT B, MEDINA INDUSTRIAL FIRST ADDITION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PROPERTY SUMMARY MEDINA INDUSTRIAL TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 43.96 AC RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION 1.16 AC NET PROPERTY AREA 42.80 AC LOT 1, BLOCK 1 7.49 AC LOT 2, BLOCK 1 5.07 AC LOT 3, BLOCK 1 8.79 AC OUTLOT A 4.42 AC OUTLOT B 1.97 AC LOT 1, BLOCK 2 15.06 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (WITHIN PROPERTY AREA)17.82 AC PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (WITHIN PROPERTY AREA)7.95 AC TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 23.77 AC WETLAND IMPACTS SEE WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATION ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) PROPOSED ZONING INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT = 50' SIDE = 50' REAR = 50' Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ S c a n n e l l \ M e d i n a \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 0 - C O V E R S H E E T . d w g N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 2 - 1 : 2 1 p m BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call PR E P A R E D F O R CO V E R S H E E T C000 M E D I N A IN D U S T R I A L SC A N N E L L M E D I N A M I N N E S O T A DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . BR I A N M . W U R D E M A N 11 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 53 1 1 3 NORTH VICINITY N.T.S. SITE MEDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2.IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A ANSI full bleed D (34.00 x 22.00 Inches) SHEET. 3.ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. 4.ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. NOTES: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE: (651) 645-4197 CONTACT: RYAN HYLLESTED P.L.A. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1826 BUERKLE ROAD ST. PAUL, MN 55110 TELEPHONE: (651) 487-3245 FAX: (651) 487-1812 CONTACT: STEVEN B. MARTIN P.E. PROJECT TEAM: SURVEYOR SUNDE LAND SURVEYING 9001 EAST BLOOMINGTON FREEWAY, STE 118 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420 TELEPHONE: (952) 881-2455 CONTACT: ARLEE CARLSON, P.L.S. ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED BY: BRIAN M. WURDEMAN P.E. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 OWNER / DEVELOPER SCANNELL 294 GROVE LANE, SUITE 140 WAYZATA, MN 55391 TELEPHONE: (763) 331-8851 MEDINA INDUSTRIAL SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 18N, RANGE 23W FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS AR R O W H E A D D R MN-5 5 PRAIRIE DR DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 8 4 6 0 2 9 11 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 AS S H O W N SJ S SJ S BM W Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title C000 COVER SHEET C100 GENERAL NOTES C101 ALTA SURVEY C102 PRELIMINARY PLAT C200 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN C201 DEMOLITION PLAN C202 DEMOLITION PLAN C203 DEMOLITION PLAN C204 DEMOLITION PLAN C300 OVERALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 C301 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 C302 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 C303 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 C304 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 C305 OVERALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2 C306 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2 C307 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2 C308 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2 C309 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2 C310 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS C311 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS C312 SWPPP NOTES C400 OVERALL SITE PLAN C401 SITE PLAN C402 SITE PLAN C403 SITE PLAN C404 SITE PLAN C405 SITE DETAILS C406 SITE DETAILS C407 SITE DETAILS C500 OVERALL GRADING PLAN C501 GRADING PLAN C502 GRADING PLAN C503 GRADING PLAN C504 GRADING PLAN C505 GRADING DETAILS C506 GRADING DETAILS C600 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C601 UTILITY PLAN C602 UTILITY PLAN C603 UTILITY PLAN C604 UTILITY PLAN C605 UTILITY DETAILS C606 UTILITY DETAILS L100 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L101 LANDSCAPE PLAN L102 LANDSCAPE PLAN L103 LANDSCAPE PLAN L104 LANDSCAPE PLAN L200 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE L201 LANDSCAPE DETAILS NOT TO SCALE UP 1 A B C D E F G H J K L M 2 3 4 OUTLOT A LO T 1 PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G 1 ±1 2 6 , 0 0 0 S F LOT 2 PROPOSED BUILDING 2 ±88,000 SF EV STALL EV STALL EV STALL EV STALL EV STALL EV STALL EV ST A L L EV ST A L L OUTSIDE STORAGE OUTSIDE STORAGE LOT 3 PROPOSED BUILDING 3 ±180,000 SF UP 60 . 0 ' 60 . 0 ' 64 . 0 ' 20 . 0 ' 20 . 0 ' 24 . 0 ' TRAIL EASEMENT EXISTING 10' UTILITY EASEMENT 50' BUILDING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 60 . 0 ' AR R O W H E A D D R I V E (P U B L I C S T R E E T ) RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION 0.89 AC MAINTENANCE ROUTE 20' D&U EASEMENT 50' BUILDING SETBACK 25 . 0 ' 15 . 0 ' 15 . 0 ' LANDSCAPE BUFFER LANDSCAPE BUFFER 24.0' 40 . 0 ' 15 . 0 ' 20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PR E P A R E D F O R O V E R A L L S I T E PL A N C400 M E D I N A IN D U S T R I A L SC A N N E L L M E D I N A M I N N E S O T A DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . BR I A N M . W U R D E M A N 11 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 53 1 1 3 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 8 4 6 0 2 9 11 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 AS S H O W N SJ S SJ S BM W BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 25.77 AC BUILDING AREA 1 126,000 SF (6.8% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) BUILDING AREA 2 88,000 SF (4.7% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) BUILDING AREA 3 182,000 SF (9.8% OF TOTAL AREA) PARKING BUILDING 1 REQUIRED PARKING 76 SPACES (18,900 SF OFFICE:1/250 SF) 54 SPACES (107,100 SF WAREHOUSE: 1/2000 SF) 130 TOTAL SPACES BUILDING 1 PROPOSED PARKING 149 SPACES @1.00 RATIO BUILDING 1 ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 5 STALLS / 5 STALLS BUILDING 2 REQUIRED PARKING 72 SPACES (17,850 SFOFFICE:1/250 SF) 35 SPACES (70,150 SF WAREHOUSE: 1/2000 SF) 107 TOTAL SPACES BUILDING 2 PROPOSED PARKING 108 SPACES @1.00 RATIO BUILDING 2 ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 5 STALLS / 5 STALLS BUILDING 3 REQUIRED PARKING 73 SPACES (18,200 SF OFFICE:1/250 SF) 82 SPACES (163,800 SF WAREHOUSE: 1/2000 SF) 155 TOTAL SPACES BUILDING 3 PROPOSED PARKING 135 SPACES @1.00 RATIO BUILDING 3 ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 5 STALLS / 5 STALLS TOTAL CITY REQ'D 392 TOTAL SPACES TOTAL PROVIDED 392 TOTAL SPACES PROPERTY SUMMARY MEDINA INDUSTRIAL TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 43.96 AC RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION 1.16 AC NET PROPERTY AREA 42.80 AC LOT 1 7.49 AC LOT 2 5.07 AC LOT 3 8.79 AC OUTLOT A 4.42 AC OUTLOT B 17.03 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (WITHIN PLATTED AREA)17.82 AC (41.64%) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (WITHIN PLATTED AREA)24.98 AC (58.36%) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 23.77 AC WETLAND IMPACTS SEE WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATION ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) PROPOSED ZONING INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT = 50' SIDE = 50' REAR = 50' PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FENCE SETBACK LINE RETAINING WALL PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK LEGEND PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ S c a n n e l l \ M e d i n a \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 4 - S I T E P L A N . d w g N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 2 - 1 : 2 9 p m © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N SITE PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3.ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'. 4.ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7.SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING , DATED 06/17/2021. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 9.NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 10.REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 11.REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 12.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 13.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 14.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 20' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 15.THERE ARE WETLAND IMPACTS, REFER TO WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATION FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. NORTH PROPOSED EV READY STALL before you dig. PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Call Know what'sbelow. R LOT 3 PROPOSED BUILDING 3 ±180,000 SF UP UP 1 A B C D E F G H J K L M 2 3 4 OUTLOT A LO T 1 PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G 1 ±1 2 6 , 0 0 0 S F LOT 2 PROPOSED BUILDING 2 ±88,000 SF EV STALL EV STALL EV STALL EV STALL EV STALL EV STALL EV ST A L L EV ST A L L OUTSIDE STORAGE OUTSIDE STORAGE D D MIN 48" ST121 MIN 48" ST104 MIN 48" ST123 MIN 48" ST130 MIN 48" ST122 MIN 48" ST107 MIN 48" ST106 MIN 48" ST105 MIN 48" ST108 MIN 48" ST103 RD-8 ST131 RD-16 RD-1 RD-3 RD-5 RD-7 MIN 48" ST119 MIN 48" ST125 MIN 48" ST118 MIN 48" ST117 MIN 84" ST116 MIN 72" ST114 MIN 72" ST110 MIN 96" ST102 MIN 48" ST124 ST109 RD-2 ST115 RD-13 ST111 RD-6 RD-4 RD-15 RD-9 RD-10 RD-11 RD-12 ST100 15 " H D P E 12 " H D P E 12" PVC 12" PVC 12" PVC 12" PVC 24 " H D P E 24 " H D P E 24 " H D P E 48" HDPE 48" HDPE 48" HDPE 24 " H D P E 24 " H D P E 12" PVC 15" PVC 15" PVC 12" PVC 12 " H D P E 12 " H D P E 12 " P V C 12 " H D P E 12 " P V C 12" PVC 12 " H D P E 15" HDPE 18" HDPE 24" HDPE 24 " H D P E 60" RCP 24 " H D P E 12 " P V C 12 " P V C 12 " P V C 12 " P V C 15" HDPE 15 " H D P E 99 0 99 5 10 0 0 98 7 98 8 98 9 99199 2 993 994 99 699 799 8 99 9 10 0 1 100 2100 3100 4 99 0995 10 0 0 10 0 5 10 0 5 99 1 99299399499699799899 9 10 0 1 10 0 2 10 0 3 10 0 4 10 0 4 10 0 6 10 0 6 10 0 7 10 0 7 10 0 8 10 0 8 1005 1004 100 4 100 4 1004 100 4 100 5 1005 10 0 5 10 0 5 10 0 5 10 0 6 10 0 6 1004 10 0 3 10 0 4 10 0 1 1000 1000 999 10 0 1 100 2 100 3 10 0 0 998 99 8 99 9 999 100 1 100 2 100 3 99 0 99 5 989 98 9 99 1 99 2 99 3 99 499 6 99 0 99 5 98 9 99 1 99 2 99 3 994 99 6 991 992 100 3 100 4 10 0 1 10 0 2 10 0 3 10 0 4 1004 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 10 0 5 100 1 10 0 2 10 0 3 10 0 4 100 6 1000 99 9 1001 1002 1003 995 99 0 98 9 99 1 99 2 99 3 100 0 99 9 100 1 100 2 1003 1002 1002 1003 1004 1001 1002 1002 10 0 5 10 0 1 1001 10 0 2 10 0 3 100 410 0 6 10 0 4 10 0 4 10 0 4 1001 1002 1003 100 1 10 0 2 10 0 3 1004 10 0 5 10 0 4 999 999 10 0 0 10 0 2 100 3 1004 1004 10 0 4 1004100410 0 3 10 0 4 10 0 3 10 0 3 10 0 1 1001 1003 995 100 0 993994 996997998999 1000 1001 1002 1. 0 0 % 1. 0 0 % 1. 0 0 % 1. 0 0 % 1. 0 0 % 1. 0 0 % 1. 0 0 % 1. 0 0 % FFE = 1004.7 FF E = 1 0 0 5 . 2 988 STORMWATER AREA 99 0 99 1 99 2 99 3 98 9 98 8 SEE SHEET C501 SEE SHEET C502 SEE SHEET C503 SEE SHEET C504 98 5 98 5 98 5 99 0 99 0 99 5 99 5 99 5 99 5 99 3 99 4 99 6 99 2 30" RCP OCS-1 ST-300 EX. WETLAND OHWL = 988.8 EX. WETLAND OHWL = 988.8 DELINEATED WETLAND 30' WETLAND BUFFER DELINEATED WETLAND 30' WETLAND BUFFER 1. 0 0 % 1. 0 0 % MIN 48" ST202 ST200 24" HD P E 24" HDPE 15" H D P E 15 " H D P E 15" HDPE MIN 48" ST120 18" HDPE18" HDPE D D MIN 48" ST201 24" H D P E ST101 60" RC P ST-83 12 " P V C 12 " P V C ST-81 MIN 48" ST-85 MIN 48" ST127 MIN 48" ST126 MIN 48" ST129 FFE = 1004.0 MIN 48" ST401 12" HDPE ST400 ST-88 15" RCP ST-400 ST-401 ST-89 Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ S c a n n e l l \ M e d i n a \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 5 - G R A D I N G P L A N . d w g N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 2 - 1 : 3 2 p m © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R PR E P A R E D F O R O V E R A L L G R A D I N G P L A N C500 M E D I N A IN D U S T R I A L SC A N N E L L M E D I N A M I N N E S O T A DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . BR I A N M . W U R D E M A N 11 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 53 1 1 3 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 8 4 6 0 2 9 11 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 AS S H O W N SJ S SJ S BM W NORTH GRADING PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13.UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL. 14.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15.GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18.ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 19.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 20.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 21.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN RETAINING WALL COORDINATION NOTES 1.RETAINING WALL SHOWN IS ONLY SCHEMATIC. ACTUAL DETAILS SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL BY ENGINEER. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ALL DIMENSION AND DETAILS NECESSARY FOR INSTALLATION. 3.RETAINING WALL SHALL BE RECON BLOCK WALL OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE TIMING OF THE INSTALLATION OF THE RETAINING WALL WITH ALL UTILITIES, SPECIFICALLY THE STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED WALLS. 5.GEOTECHNICAL BORING INFORMATION BASED ON THE REPORT LISTED ON SHEET C100. 6.FINISHED ELEVATIONS ON THE GRADING PLAN ARE AS STATED ON THE PLAN WITH THE TOP OF THE WALL SPOTS AND BOTTOM OF WALL SPOTS DENOTING THE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. ACTUAL BOTTOM AND TOP OF RETAINING WALL ELEVATIONS MAY VARY DUE TO MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL ACTIVITIES WITH THE WALL REINFORCING AND ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION, WETLAND LIMITS, AND RIGHT-OF-WAY LIMITS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL NECESSARY COORDINATION, STAGING, TEMPORARY SHORING, AND SEQUENCING AT NO EXTRA COST. UP UP 1 A B C D E F G H J K L M 2 3 4 OUTLOT A EV STALL EV STALL EV STALL EV STALL EV STALL EV STALL EV ST A L L EV ST A L L SS-1 SS-2 SS-3 SS-7 SS-6 SS-8 SS-5SS-4 8" P V C 8" PVC 8" P V C 8" PVC 6" P V C 6" P V C 6" PVC 8" WATERMAIN 8" WATERMAIN 6" WATERMAIN 8" WATERMAIN 8" WATERMAIN SEE SHEET C601 SEE SHEET C602 SEE SHEET C603 8" WATERMAIN 8" P V C SS-9 SEE SHEET C604 8" WATERMAIN 8" WATERMAIN PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING CURB DURING CONSTRUCTION 2" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT FOR FUTURE EV STALLS 2" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT FOR FUTURE EV STALLS 2" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT FOR FUTURE EV STALLS Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ S c a n n e l l \ M e d i n a \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 6 - U T I L I T Y P L A N . d w g N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 2 - 1 : 3 6 p m BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call PR E P A R E D F O R O V E R A L L U T I L I T Y PL A N C600 M E D I N A IN D U S T R I A L SC A N N E L L M E D I N A M I N N E S O T A DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . BR I A N M . W U R D E M A N 11 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 53 1 1 3 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 8 4 6 0 2 9 11 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 AS S H O W N SJ S SJ S BM W UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1.ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES. 2.SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP 8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP 6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-1785 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 3.WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241 CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150 4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PER ANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241. 4.MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 5.ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 6.ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-6" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES. 8.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 9.LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BACKFILLING. 10.TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS. 11.ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I. 12.EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES. 13.REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. 14.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF MEDINA AND/OR STATE OF MINNESOTA WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. 15.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 16.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 19.BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 20.ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. 21.ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION BLOCKING. 22.THE CITY SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH VARIATIONS IN THE UTILITY AS-BUILT ELEVATIONS. ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. 23.THE CITY, OR AGENTS OF THE CITY, ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ERRORS AND OMISSIONS ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS, THE OWNER AND ENGINEER OF RECORD ARE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MEET THE CITY'S STANDARDS. 24.ALL WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER TESTING SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. COPIES OF ALL TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY (PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, CITY ENGINEER) THE OWNER, AND THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. 25.THE CITY WILL REQUIRE TELEVISING FOR SANITARY SEWER PIP INSTALLATIONS PRIOR TO ACCEPTING A WARRANTY FOR THE UTILITY SYSTEM; PROVIDE REPORT AND VIDEO FILES TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW. 26.TRACER WIRE INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION STANDARDS. SEE THESE STANDARDS FOR FURTHER DETAILS. NORTH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN GATE VALVE HYDRANT TEE REDUCER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE GAS MAIN STORM SEWER LEGEND CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO EXISTING PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL/SIZE BHS 8 PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA BLACK HILLS SPRUCE B & B 6` HT. CED 9 THUJA OCCIDENTALIS WHITE CEDAR B & B 6` HT. ERC 3 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA EASTERN RED CEDAR B & B 6` HT. PON 6 PINUS PONDEROSA PONDEROSA PINE B & B 6` HT. SCO 3 PINUS SYLVESTRIS SCOTCH PINE B & B 6` HT. WHS 17 PICEA GLAUCA WHITE SPRUCE B & B 6` HT. ORNAMENTAL TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL/SIZE ABS 9 AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA 'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY CLUMP FOR B & B 6` HT. HAW 10 CRATAEGUS CRUS-GALLI INERMIS THORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORN CLUMP FORM B & B 6` HT. QUA+41 POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN CLUMP FORM B & B 6` HT. RIV+15 BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNK B & B 6` HT. OVERSTORY TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL/SIZE ABM 9 ACER X FREEMANII 'AUTUMN BLAZE'AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE B & B 2.5" CAL. BOU 21 TILIA AMERICANA `BOULEVARD`BOULEVARD AMERICAN LINDEN B & B 2.5" CAL. HAC 17 CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS HACKBERRY B & B 2.5" CAL. HON 3 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS 'SKYCOLE' TM SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST B & B 2.5" CAL. SWO 10 QUERCUS BICOLOR SWAMP WHITE OAK B & B 2.5" CAL. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING AJN 13 PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `JEFAM`AMBER JUBILEE NINEBARK #5 CONT.4` O.C. ANH 15 HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS `ANNABELLE`ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA #5 CONT.4` O.C. BLC 33 ARONIA MELANOCARPA `IROQUOIS BEAUTY` TM IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY #5 CONT.4` O.C. DBH 142 DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT.3` O.C. GLS 51 RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW`GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC #5 CONT.4` O.C. PJM 30 RHODODENDRON X `P.J.M.`PJM RHODODENDRON #5 CONT.4` O.C. PERENNIALS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING AST 420 ASTILBE X ARENDSII `RHEINLAND`RHIENLAND ASTILBE #1 CONT. HKG 86 HAKONECHLOA MACRA `AUREOLA`GOLDEN VARIEGATED HAKONECHLOA #1 CONT KFG 55 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT PDS 66 SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT PWW 54 ECHINACEA X `POW WOW WILDBERRY`POW WOW WILDBERRY CONEFLOWER #1 CONT WLC 112 NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW`WALKERS LOW CATMINT #1 CONT PLANT SCHEDULE Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ S c a n n e l l \ M e d i n a \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ L 1 - L A N D S C A P E D E T A I L S . d w g N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 2 - 1 : 4 3 p m BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call PR E P A R E D F O R LA N D S C A P E SC H E D U L E L200 M E D I N A IN D U S T R I A L SC A N N E L L M E D I N A M I N N E S O T A DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L LA N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U N D E R T H E L A W S O F TH E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . RY A N A . H Y L L E S T E D , P L A 11 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 53 8 2 8 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 8 4 6 0 2 9 11 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 AS S H O W N BP S BP S RA H LANDSCAPE LEGEND EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING VEGETATION EDGE TO REMAIN (TYP.) EDGER (TYP.) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION, SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.) SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.) A B C D E LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES EDGER (TYP.) DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) ROCK MULCH (TYP.) SOD (TYP.) MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.) UP UP 1 A B C D E F G H J K L M 2 3 4 OUTLOT A EV STALL EV STALL EV STALL EV STALL EV STALL EV STALL EV ST A L L EV ST A L L SEE SHEET L101 SEE SHEET L102 SEE SHEET L103 SEE SHEET L104 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BY OTHERS STORM WATER SYSTEM AR R O W H E A D D R I V E (P U B L I C S T R E E T ) EX. INDUSTRIAL / MANUFACTURING LORAM MAINTENANCE OF WAY SEEDING KEYNOTES SEED WITH MNDOT 22-112: FIVE-YEAR STABILIZATION SEED MIX (TYP.) SEED WITH MNDOT 33-261: STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.) SEED WITH MNDOT 34-171: WETLAND REHABILITATION SEED MIX (TYP.) SEED WITH MNDOT 35-221: DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL SEED MIX (TYP.) 22-112 33-261 34-171 35-221 Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ S c a n n e l l \ M e d i n a \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ L 1 - L A N D S C A P E P L A N . D W G D e c e m b e r 2 3 , 2 0 2 2 - 1 2 : 5 9 p m BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call PR E P A R E D F O R O V E R A L L LA N D S C A P E P L A N L100 M E D I N A IN D U S T R I A L SC A N N E L L M E D I N A M I N N E S O T A NORTH LANDSCAPE SUMMARY ZONED: BUSINESS DISTRICT MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED TREES:82 OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS / CONIFEROUS TREES = 4,096 L.F. SITE PERIMETER/50 41 ORNAMENTAL TREES = 4,096 L.F. SITE PERIMETER/100 PROVIDED TREES:106 OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS / CONIFEROUS TREES = 60 DECIDUOUS TREES + 46 CONIFEROUS TREES 75 ORNAMENTAL TREES REQUIRED SHRUBS: 137 SHRUBS = 4,096 L.F. SITE PERIMETER/30 PROVIDED SHRUBS: 284 SHRUBS EXISTING TREES REMOVED: 5 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN: 17 TOTAL TREES REQUIRED: 123 = 82 OVERSTORY + 41 ORNAMENTAL TOTAL TREES PROPOSED: 181 = 106 OVERSTORY + 75 ORNAMENTAL LANDSCAPE SUMMARY DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L LA N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U N D E R T H E L A W S O F TH E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . RY A N A . H Y L L E S T E D , P L A 11 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 53 8 2 8 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 8 4 6 0 2 9 12 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 2 AS S H O W N BP S BP S RA H Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ S c a n n e l l \ M e d i n a \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ L 1 - L A N D S C A P E D E T A I L S . d w g N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 2 - 1 : 4 3 p m BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call BUILDING, EXTERIOR WALL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDING SPECIFIED ROCK MULCH 1.5' MAINTENANCE STRIP EDGER, AS SPECIFIED SOIL MIX TO BE MINIMUM OF 4" BELOW EDGING TOP TO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE LIP FOR MULCH. SPECIFIED SOIL MIX FINISH GRADE FOR LAWN MAINTENANCE STRIP DETAIL SCALE: 1-1/2"=1'L2015 PR E P A R E D F O R LA N D S C A P E DE T A I L S L201 M E D I N A IN D U S T R I A L SC A N N E L L M E D I N A M I N N E S O T A DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L LA N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U N D E R T H E L A W S O F TH E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . RY A N A . H Y L L E S T E D , P L A 11 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 53 8 2 8 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 8 4 6 0 2 9 11 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 AS S H O W N BP S BP S RA H DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH NOTES: 2X ROOT BALL WIDTH SOD 4" TOPSOIL PREPARED PLANTING BED AND BACKFILL SOIL (THOROUGHLY LOOSENED) NOTES: 1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT. 3.REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT AND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 4.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 5.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 6.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 7.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 8.MIX IN 3-4" OF ORGANIC COMPOST. 1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING. 3.SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. 4.SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6" INTERVALS. 5.BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT. REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 6.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 7.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 8.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 9.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 10.FINAL LOCATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. PLANTING SOIL ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN. EXTEND HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTH A MINIMUM OF 6" BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. FINISHED GRADE EDGER, AS SPECIFIED TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L2011 SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L2012 MULCH 3/16" X 4" STEEL EDGER 12" STEEL EDGER SPIKE TURF/SOD SUBGRADE 12" STEEL EDGER SPIKE 3/16" X 4" STEEL EDGER 4' MULCH TURF/SOD TOP OF EDGER TO BE FLUSH WITH SOD PLANSECTION STEEL EDGER DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L2014SPADED EDGE DETAIL SCALE: 1-1/2"=1'L2013 MULCH AT PLANTING AREA SPADED EDGE "V" SHAPED, 4" WIDTH, 4" DEPTH, MORE VERTICAL ON LAWN SIDE LAWN GRASS FINISHED GRADE 4" 1" NOTE: 1.EXTENDED EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL SOIL TO A POINT DOWNSLOPE EQUAL TO OR LOWER IN ELEVATION THAN THE BOTTOM OF THE HOLE DIRECTLY BENEATH THE PLANT TO INSURE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE IN HEAVY SOILS. GRANULAR SOIL MUST BE ADDED AS BACKFILL IN AREAS OF POOR DRAINAGE. STEEP SLOPE PLANTING SCALE: N.T.S.L2016 EXISTING GRADE CUT AREA PLANT ACCORDING TO PLANTING DETAILS APPLICABLE AS SHOWN BACKFILL AREA 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2.ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4.ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6.ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7.PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8.PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9.PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10.PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 12.PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14.STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15.THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16.BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17.MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND DYE-FREE, NATURAL IN COLOR, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE BUFF LIMESTONE, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18.EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE COL-MET (OR EQUAL) STEEL EDGING; 3/16" THICK, COLOR BLACK, OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. STEEL EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH TOP OF EDGER AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19.ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 20.PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 21.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22.REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23.REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. 24.MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS UNTIL PROJECT COMPLETION, BUT IN NO CASE, LESS THAN FOLLOWING PERIOD; 1 YEAR AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS BY PRUNING, CULTIVATING, AND WEEDING AS REQUIRED FOR HEALTHY GROWTH. RESTORE PLANTING SAUCERS. TIGHTEN AND REPAIR STAKE AND GUY SUPPORTS AND RESET TREES AND SHRUBS TO PROPER GRADES OR VERTICAL POSITION AS REQUIRED. RESTORE OR REPLACE DAMAGED WRAPPINGS. SPRAY AS REQUIRED TO KEEP TREES AND SHRUBS FREE OF INSECTS AND DISEASE. REPLENISH MULCH TO THE REQUIRED DEPTH. MAINTAIN LAWNS FOR 45 DAYS AFTER INSTALLING SOD INCLUDING MOWING WHEN SOD RECITES 4” IN HEIGHT. WEED PLANTING BEDS AND MULCH SAUCERS AT MINIMUM ONCE A MONTH DURING THE GROWING SEASON. PROVIDE A MONTHLY REPORT TO THE OWNER ON WEEDING AND OTHER MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. LANDSCAPE NOTES 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-A 133' - 4" 12345 T.O. STRUCTURE-B 135' - 0" ROOF ELEVATION 132' - 4" AVERAGE GRADE ELEVATION 98' - 8" 33 ' - 8 " PC-1GL-1 BRK-1PC-1 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-A 133' - 4" A B C D E F G H J K L M N T.O. STRUCTURE-B 135' - 0"PC-1 BRK-1 GL-1 ROOF ELEVATION 132' - 4" AVERAGE GRADE ELEVATION 98' - 8" 33 ' - 8 " PC-1GL-1 BRK-1PC-1PC-1PC-1PC-1BRK-1BRK-1 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-A 133' - 4" 1 2 3 4 T.O. STRUCTURE-B 135' - 0" ROOF ELEVATION 132' - 4" AVERAGE GRADE ELEVATION 98' - 8" 33 ' - 8 " PC-1GL-1BRK-1 PC-1 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-A 133' - 4" ABCDEFGHJKLMN DOCK LEVEL 96' - 0" ROOF ELEVATION 132' - 4" AVERAGE GRADE ELEVATION 98' - 8" 33 ' - 8 " GL-1 PC-1 PC-1 STEEL FORM FINISH PRECAST WALL PANELS WITH REVEALS - PAINTED AREA: 45,324 SF - 80% EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND BRK-1 PRECAST WALL PANEL WITH IMBEDDED THIN BRICK VENEER AREA: 3,570 SF - 6% GL-1 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLAZING AREA: 8,026 SF - 14% DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N A R C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NO T FOR CONSTRU CTION C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 2 8 5 _ M e d i n a 1 _ M a s t e r _ a a u t r e y F W D H J .rv t A300 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS S.PAETZEL A.AUTREY 07/12/2022 20301 JOBS\SCANNELL\NORTHPARKVI_20301 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PROPOSED BUILDING 1 NEW CONSTRUCTION ARROWHEAD DRIVE MEDINA, MN 44256 3/64" = 1'-0"A300 2 ELEVATION - NORTH 3/64" = 1'-0"A300 1 ELEVATION - WEST 3/64" = 1'-0"A300 3 ELEVATION - SOUTH 3/64" = 1'-0"A300 4 ELEVATION - EAST A300 5 3D VIEW NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" 1 2 3 4 T.O. WALL - B 135' - 0" T.O. WALL - C 138' - 10" ROOF ELEVATION 132' - 4" AVERAGE GRADE ELEVATION 98' - 8" 33 ' - 8 " BRK-1 PC-1GL-1 PC-1 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" ABCDEFGHJKLM T.O. WALL - B 135' - 0" T.O. WALL - C 138' - 10" ROOF ELEVATION 132' - 4" AVERAGE GRADE ELEVATION 98' - 8" 33 ' - 8 " BRK-1 PC-1 GL-1 BRK-1BRK-1BRK-1 PC-1PC-1 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" 1234 T.O. WALL - B 135' - 0" ROOF ELEVATION 132' - 4" AVERAGE GRADE ELEVATION 98' - 8" 33 ' - 8 " PC-1 GL-1 BRK-1PC-1PC-1 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" A B C D E F G H J K L M DOCK LEVEL 96' - 0" T.O. WALL - B 135' - 0" K.O.K.O.K.O.K.O. ROOF ELEVATION 132' - 4" AVERAGE GRADE ELEVATION 98' - 8" 33 ' - 8 " PC-1 GL-1 EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND PC-1 STEEL FORM FINISH PRECAST WALL PANELS WITH REVEALS - PAINTED AREA: 40,112 SF - 80% GL-1 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLAZING AREA: 5,160 SF - 10% BRK-1 PRECAST WALL PANEL WITH IMBEDDED THIN BRICK VENEER AREA: 4,998 SF - 10% DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N A R C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NO T FOR CONSTRU CTION C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 2 8 6 _ M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l P a r k _ 2 _ a a ut r e y F W D H J . r v t A300 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS S.PAETZEL/T. MOHAGEN A AUTREY 07/12/2022 21286 JOBS\SCANNELL\MEDINA2_21286 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PROPOSED BUILDING 2 NEW CONSTRUCTION MEDINA, MN 44256 3/64" = 1'-0"A300 2 ELEVATION - WEST 3/64" = 1'-0"A300 1 ELEVATION - NORTH 3/64" = 1'-0"A300 3 ELEVATION - EAST 3/64" = 1'-0"A300 4 ELEVATION - SOUTH A300 5 3D View NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-A 133' - 4" A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q T.O. STRUCTURE-B 135' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-C 137' - 0" ROOF ELEVATION 132' - 4" AVERAGE GRADE ELEVATION 98' - 8" PC-1 GL-1 BRK-1 33 ' - 8 " BRK-1 BRK-1 PC-1 PC-1 PC-1 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-A 133' - 4" ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQ DOCK LEVEL 96' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-C 137' - 0" ROOF ELEVATION 132' - 4" AVERAGE GRADE ELEVATION 98' - 8" PC-1 GL-1 33 ' - 8 " 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" 6 5 4 3 2 1 DOCK LEVEL 96' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-B 135' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-C 137' - 0" ROOF ELEVATION 132' - 4" AVERAGE GRADE ELEVATION 98' - 8" PC-1 GL-1 33 ' - 8 " BRK-1 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" 654321 T.O. STRUCTURE-B 135' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-C 137' - 0" ROOF ELEVATION 132' - 4" AVERAGE GRADE ELEVATION 98' - 8" PC-1 GL-1 33 ' - 8 " BRK-1 EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND PC-1 STEEL FORM FINISH PRECAST WALL PANELS WITH REVEALS - PAINTED AREA: 54,891 SF - 79% GL-1 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLAZING AREA: 9,072 SF - 13% BRK-1 PRECAST WALL PANEL WITH IMBEDDED THIN BRICK VENEER AREA: 5,350 SF - 8% DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N A R C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NO T FOR CONSTRU CTION 18074 TODD MOHAGEN, AIA, NCARB I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. REGISTRATION NUMBER: C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 2 8 7 _ M e d i n a 3 _ I n d u s t r i a l _ P a r k _ a a u tre y F W D H J . r v t A300 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS S. PAETZEL T. NICHOLIE 07/12/2022 21287 Jobs\Scannell\Medina3_21287 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PROPOSED BUILDING 3 NEW CONSTRUCTION MEDINA, MN 44256 3/64" = 1'-0"A300 1 ELEVATION - SOUTH 3/64" = 1'-0"A300 4 ELEVATION - NORTH 3/64" = 1'-0"A300 2 ELEVATION - WEST 3/64" = 1'-0"A300 3 ELEVATION - EAST NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A300 5 3D VIEW Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 1 of 8 January 17, 2023 PUD General Plan/Pre-Plat City Council Meeting TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: January 12, 2023 MEETING: January 17, 2023 City Council SUBJECT: Medina Ventures – Medina Park and Boardwalk - 1472 Highway 55 (PID 0211823330003) – PUD General Plan; Pre-Plat Summary of Request Medina Ventures has approval of a PUD General Plan and preliminary plat for a development including commercial uses and four townhome units located along Meander Road east of Arrowhead Drive, west of Fields of Medina West. The City Council also reviewed at its December 6 meeting. Minutes from the City Council meeting are attached for reference. The applicant previously proposed for the 4 townhome units to be used as lodging in connection with the event venue. During the public hearing and discussion at the Planning Commission and Council meetings, concerns were raised with the lodging use of the townhomes north of Meander Road. The applicant suggested an alternative to potentially add additional square footage above the event venue to accommodate the lodging use, and the townhomes would then be used as single-family dwellings. The City Council tabled the request following review on December 6 so that the applicant could update architectural plans to incorporate the lodging space into the event venue. These plans are attached. The applicant proposes to construct two stories of lodging above the middle of the event venue, proposed to accommodate 14 lodging suites with a total of 19 rooms (5 suites are proposed to include a 2nd bedroom). The applicant has also updated the design of the twinhomes because of the intention to use as dwellings rather than lodging. Because of the proposed changes, the updated architectural information is attached for review and is summarized below. Other aspects of the request have not changed significantly since Council’s review in December. As such, staff did not repeat the information in this report. Information on other aspects of the project is available in the original staff report, which can be provided by staff, or by accessing at: https://medinamn.us/citygov/departments/planning-zoning/ Proposed Uses: Event Venue 14 lodging suites Restaurant Day Care 9,600 s.f. retail 4 townhomes Gross Site Area: 18 acres Net Site Area: 4.9 acre commercial 1.5 acre residential Land Use (north): LDR Current Zoning (north): RR-UR Land Use (south): Commercial Current Zoning (south): CH Proposed Zoning: PUD MEMORANDUM Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 2 of 8 January 17, 2023 PUD General Plan/Pre-Plat City Council Meeting Purpose of a Planned Unit Development According to Section 827.25, PUD provisions are established to provide comprehensive procedures and standards designed to allow greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and/or nonresidential areas by incorporating design modifications and allowing for a mixture of uses. The PUD process, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Code related to setbacks, lot area, width and depth, yards, and other development standards is intended to encourage: 1. Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design, and placement of structures and by the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. 2. Higher standards of site and building design. 3. The preservation, enhancement, or restoration of desirable site characteristics such as high quality natural resources, wooded areas, wetlands, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 3 of 8 January 17, 2023 PUD General Plan/Pre-Plat City Council Meeting 4. Innovative approaches to stormwater management and low-impact development practices which result in volume control and improvement to water quality beyond the standard requirements of the City. 5. Maintenance of open space in portions of the development site, preferably linked to surrounding open space areas, and also enhanced buffering from adjacent roadways and lower intensity uses. 6. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly development and use pattern and more convenience in location and design of development and service facilities. 7. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lower development costs and public investments. 8. A development pattern that effectuates the objectives of the Medina Comprehensive Plan. (PUD is not intended as a means to vary applicable planning and zoning principles.) 9. A more desirable and creative environment than might be possible through the strict application on zoning and subdivision regulations of the City. The applicant has provided a description of the flexibility contemplated by the PUD. These are discussed throughout the report but can be summarized as follows. • Setback for Daycare building to Meander Road – the daycare structure is proposed 12’ from the Meander Rd right-of-way rather than the 25’ required by CH district. The applicant notes that the building is proposed to be oriented such that the western 1/3 of the building is close to Meander Road. The eastern 2/3 of the structure exceeds the minimum. • Setback between twinhomes – The applicant proposes 12’ between twin home buildings. The R2 district requires 20 feet. • Architectural/Building Materials – the applicant proposes a mix of exterior building materials which are different from the CH standards. • Upland buffers – the applicant proposes to meet the average upland buffer area on the development site, but proposes limited areas narrower than the minimum width contemplated in the ordinance. The applicant proposes to reduce the area of the required buffer north of Meander Road, and provide an equal area south of Meander Road. The applicant also proposes fencing and physical separation from these buffers rather than the setback required by code. • Additional density north of Meander Road – the property north of Meander Road is guided Low Density Residential (LDR), allowing development at 2-3 units/acre. The applicant proposes 4 units, which would equate to approximately 3.5 units/acre. The Comprehensive Plan allows for up to +20% density (3.6 units/acre) “for developments that protect the natural features or exceed other standards of the zoning district.” • Parking Lot Landscaping – the applicant proposes to reduce the landscaped area within the parking lot from 8% to 5% of the parking lot area. The applicant notes that their landscaping throughout the remainder of the site will exceed minimum standards and that the design of the event venue and twinhomes should be viewed as contributing to the landscaping of the site. • Tree Replacement – there are many large cottonwood and boxelder trees on the site, as well as many ash trees. The applicant requests flexibility for replacement because there are no wooded areas on the site, and in recognition of the comparatively low quality of the trees and the fact the site is intended for more intensive commercial development. • Parking – the applicant proposes alternative measures to reduce parking need for large events, such as valet service, shuttling, and rideshare. This type of flexibility may be permissible under the general parking standards, but may be better implemented through the PUD. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 4 of 8 January 17, 2023 PUD General Plan/Pre-Plat City Council Meeting Architectural Design-Commercial The applicant has submitted updated renderings and narrative intended to guide the design of the proposed buildings. The applicant’s design generally proposes more metal and wood than is generally allowed in the CH district. The design of the event venue building has been updated to include a second and third story over the center portion of the building for the lodging rooms. Original: Updated with lodging rooms: Building Materials The CH district requires: “All exterior building materials shall be durable and meet the following standards: (a) A minimum of 30 percent of the building exterior shall be brick, natural stone, stucco (not Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product), copper, or glass. (b) A maximum of 70 percent may be decorative concrete, split face (rock face) decorative block, and/or decorative pre-cast concrete panels. Decorative concrete shall be color impregnated in earth tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a high-quality terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine appearance. (c) A maximum of 20 percent may be wood, metal (excluding copper), or fiber cement lap siding, if used as accent materials which are integrated into the overall building design. The applicant’s architectural narrative describes the proposed design and materials. It is important to note that the buildings may deviate from the elevations shown when constructed, but that the narrative and elevations provide broad requirements. The materials will be required to fall within the ranges specified, the height of the structures would not exceed that shown, and architectural elements will be similar or more expansive to those shown. Materials CH Standard Event Venue Mall Restaurant Daycare Glass, stone, brick, stucco Min 30% > 47% 25-30% 25-30% 15-30% Concrete (decorative) Max 70% 15-25% 15-25% 50-85% Metal, wood, fiber cement Max 20% 15-25% 50-70% 15-40% 70-80% Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 5 of 8 January 17, 2023 PUD General Plan/Pre-Plat City Council Meeting Building Modulation – minimum of one element per 40 linear feet of façade. Third floors shall be set back minimum of 6 feet from lower floors. Fenestration/Transparency – “Building elevations which face a public street shall include generous window coverage. Alternative architectural elements may be approved by the city when windows are not practical.” Multi-sided Architecture – “Any rear or side building elevation which faces a public street, an interior access drive for the development, or a residential zoning district shall include design and architectural elements of a quality generally associated with a front façade. The elevation(s) shall be compatible with the front building elevation. Additional signage shall be permitted for an elevation facing a public street or interior access drive, as regulated within the sign ordinance. Multi-sided architecture shall not be required in situations where the rear or side building elevation is fully screened from view from the adjacent street or residential property.” The Planning Commission and Council are encouraged to provide feedback on the proposed materials, which differ fairly significantly from the CH standards. Flexibility is permitted in the context of the PUD if it results is a more desirable design and project than would be achievable through strict adherence to the CH code. The PUD provides the City increased discretion on architectural design. If the Planning Commission and City Council desire improvements to the architecture, they should be discussed at the meeting. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission and Council discuss whether additional architectural elements should be included on the daycare, restaurant, and retail buildings. Architectural Design -Residential The applicant has provided architectural renderings for the proposed residential building. The R1 and R2 districts do not provide much in terms of specific architectural requirements except that garage doors which occupy more than half of a façade have to include architectural features. The applicant proposes wood as an exterior material. The original design had included a solarium/porch feature on the roof of the structures. The applicant has removed these features in place of a 2nd story now that the structures are proposed as dwellings. Garage doors would be less than 50% of the frontage of the structures. The PUD process affords the City additional discretion with regard to architectural design on the residential structures. Staff recommends either modulating the roofline of the twinhomes or providing some sort of element to break up the roofline. The applicant has requested allowance to allow for a pitched roof, provided the slope does not exceed 8/12. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 6 of 8 January 17, 2023 PUD General Plan/Pre-Plat City Council Meeting Review Criteria Planned Unit Development The City has a high level of discretion when reviewing a PUD because it is a rezoning, which is a legislative action. A PUD should only be approved if it achieves the purposes of the PUD district (described on page 2-3), the Comprehensive Plan, and other City policies. The PUD process allows flexibility to the general zoning standards to result in a more desirable development than would be expected through strict adherence to the requirements, which in this case are the CH and R1 or R2 requirements. The process provides flexibility which is ultimately at the discretion of the City. Such flexibility often cuts in both directions, certain aspects of the development may not meet the general standards while other exceed minimum standards. The flexibility provides the opportunity for collaboration in site design because the City can request adjustments which may be seen as preferred, but would not be required under general standards. Preliminary Plat The City has a comparatively low level of discretion while reviewing a preliminary plat. Unless the Council makes one or more of the findings for denial noted below, a preliminary plat should be approved. “In the case of all subdivisions, the City shall deny approval of a preliminary or final plat if one or a combination of the following findings are made: (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city, or that the proposed subdivision is premature, as defined in Section 820.28. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. In this case, the portion of the property north of Meander Road is zoned RR-UR, so the plat is contingent upon the rezoning to PUD. If the PUD were not approved, the proposed lots would not meet minimum lot standards, which is one of the findings for denial. If the PUD is approved, it does not appear that these findings are met, so the plat could be approved, subject to the conditions suggested below. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission and City Council consider the PUD purpose and Comp Plan objectives to determine if the PUD results in a more desirable development than that which may be achievable through strict adherence with the standards. Staff has summarized the requirements of the underlying districts through the reports, and the flexibility being proposed was described throughout, and summarized on the bottom of page 3 of the report. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 7 of 8 January 17, 2023 PUD General Plan/Pre-Plat City Council Meeting Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the updated architectural design at its January 17, 2023 meeting. An excerpt from their draft meeting minutes is attached. The Commission had previously recommended approval of the PUD general plan and preliminary plat subject to shifting the lodging to the commercial property. Commissioners suggested additional architectural elements to provide modulation for the taller portion of the event venue, and similarly recommended elements be incorporated to break up the roofline of the restaurant and retail buildings. Commissioners also discussed incorporating standards for signage into the Planned Unit Development. Commissioners suggested standards for signage which provide more of a rural feel and which recognizes nearby residential uses. Staff has reviewed and proposes the following standards related to signage. Signs shall abide by the requirements of the CH district except as follows: 1) Maximum of one freestanding sign along the Highway 55 frontage for the entire development, and this sign shall be subject to the limitations for freestanding signs in the CH district. (Note: CH code would allow each lot to have a pylon or monument sign along each frontage) 2) One monument sign permitted at the entrance along Meander. No pylon signs shall be permitted along Meander Road. The monument sign shall meet the requirements of the CH district. (Note: CH code would allow each lot to have a pylon or monument sign along each frontage) 3) Any wall sign on the north or east elevation of the building on Lot 2, Block 2 shall not be internally illuminated. (note: daycare building) 4) No wall sign shall be permitted above the first story of the north elevation of the building on Lot 1, Block 2 (note: event venue building) 5) No wall sign shall be permitted above the second story of the east elevation of the building on Lot 1, Block 2 (note: event venue building) 6) Projecting signs shall be permitted, provided adequate clearance is provided and that the area of such signs is included within the allowed area of wall signage for the building in question. These limitations have been incorporated into the draft ordinance. The City Council can discuss and provide direction on whether there are additional standards to consider. Following the Planning Commission’s discussion, they recommended approval of the preliminary plat and PUD General plan subject to a series of conditions. These conditions have been incorporated into the attached ordinance and resolution. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 8 of 8 January 17, 2023 PUD General Plan/Pre-Plat City Council Meeting Potential Action If the Council finds that the proposed PUD meets the purpose and objectives described above, the following actions could be taken: 1) Move to adopt the ordinance establishing a planned unit development district for Meander Park and Boardwalk and amending the official zoning map 2) Move to adopt the resolution authorizing publication by title and summary 3) Move to adopt the resolution granting preliminary plat and PUD general plan approval for Meander Park and Boardwalk Attachments 1. Draft Ordinance 2. Resolution authorizing publication by title and summary 3. Draft Resolution 4. Comp Plan Info 5. Excerpt from 12/6/2022 City Council minutes 6. Excerpt from draft 1/10/2023 Planning Commission minutes 7. Proposed Architectural Requirement Narrative (updated 12/22/2022) 8. Applicant narrative 9. PUD Flexibility Summary 10. Water Feature Exhibit 11. Preliminary Plat (updated 12/22/2022) 12. Architectural information (updated 12/22/2022) Ordinance No. ### 1 DATE CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. ### AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR “MEANDER PARK AND BOARDWALK” AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP THE CITY COUNCIL OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Medina received a request to change the zoning classification of the property legally described in Exhibit A (the “Property”) to Planned Unit Development. Based on the written and oral record before the Planning Commission and City Council during review of the request as well as all additional testimony submitted to the City, the City Council has found that the proposed rezoning of the Property to Planned Unit Development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and serves the purpose of the Planned Unit Development district. Section 2. The Property is hereby rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The location of the zoning amendment is depicted on the map in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Section 3. The Meander Park and Boardwalk Planned Unit Development General Plan is hereby approved. A. All entitlements, including but not limited to, allowed uses, density, dimensional standards, setbacks and development standards established within this PUD District are hereby set forth by the Meander Park and Boardwalk General Plan dated ______, (the “General Plan”) which are incorporated herein by reference, except as may be expressly modified by this ordinance or Resolution 2023-##. B. Unless specifically addressed by this ordinance, the Property shall be subject to the requirements set forth by the City of Medina Zoning Ordinance, including the Two- Family Residential (“R2”) zoning district north of Meander Road, the Commercial- Highway (“CH”) zoning district south of Meander Road, as well as other relevant standards which are not district-specific. C. The lots within the Property south of Meander Road shall be classified as “Commercial Lots” and the lots within the Property north of Meander Road shall be classified as “Twinhome Lots” as described in Exhibit B. The Commercial Lots and Twinhome Lots shall be subject to the relevant standards described herein. Section 4. Allowed Uses. The allowed uses within the PUD District shall be as follows: A. Commercial Lots. i. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses shall be those described in the General Plan. Other permitted uses described in the CH zoning district shall be allowed upon the Commercial Lots, subject to administrative review by City staff for Ordinance No. ### 2 DATE compliance with relevant standards, including but not limited to parking requirements. ii. Conditional Uses. The following shall be permitted within the Commercial Lots, subject to separate conditional use permit approval, the specific requirements established in Section 838.5.08, and other applicant provisions of the city code: a. Indoor Recreational Uses, including but not limited to bowling alleys, dance halls, movie theaters, and live entertainment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Event Venue and Conservatory as described within the General Plan shall be considered permitted uses and shall not require separate conditional use permit approval b. Retail and service uses which include the keeping of animals on-site. iii. Accessory Uses. Allowed accessory uses shall be those described in the CH district, except Outdoor Storage shall not be permitted. B. Twinhome Lots. The permitted, conditional, and accessory uses shall be those described in the R2 zoning district, except that Accessory Dwelling Units shall not be permitted. Dwellings, or any portion thereof, shall not be used for short-term rentals. For the purpose of this ordinance, the term short-term rental means the rental of a dwelling or portion thereof for less than 30 consecutive days. Section 5. Lot Standards. A. The layout of the Commercial Lots and the structures and improvements thereon shall be substantially consistent with the General Plan. Minor deviations may be approved by City staff provided the square footage of the structures does not exceed that shown on the General Plan and the setbacks of the structures and parking lot do not decrease from that shown. B. The Twinhome Lots shall be subject to the requirements of the R2 zoning district except as explicitly described below. i. Minimum lot size: 4,500 square feet ii. Minimum front yard setback: 5 feet from front lot line iii. Minimum side yard setback: 6 feet, except the side yard setback shall be reduced to zero for the common wall between two dwelling units. iv. Maximum impervious surface coverage: 62% Section 6. Design and Development Standards. All standards not specified by this ordinance are to be the same as found in the Medina Zoning Ordinance for the relevant underlying zoning districts specified herein. The following deviations from the underlying performance standards are hereby in effect for the Meander Park and Boardwalk Planned Unit Development: A. Building Materials and Design shall be consistent with the standards approved by the City Council at the time of final plat review, which shall be subject to review for consistency with enhancements required in Resolution 2023-##. Ordinance No. ### 3 DATE B. Landscaping and tree replacement shall be consistent with the landscaping plan approved by the City Council at the time of final plat review, which shall be subject to review for consistency with enhancements required in Resolution 2023- ##. C. The location of Upland Buffers shall be as depicted on the General Plan. Fencing shall be provided along the edge of the Upland Buffer adjacent to the Twinhome Lots. Vegetation and signage shall meet relevant ordinance standards. D. Signage shall abide by the requirements of the City Sign Ordinance except as expressly described below. Signage on the Commercial Lots shall meet the requirements described for the Commercial-Highway district except as follows: i. A maximum of one freestanding sign shall be permitted adjacent to the Highway 55 frontage on the Property. This sign shall be subject to the requirements for freestanding signs in the CH district. ii. One monument sign shall be permitted adjacent to the shared access of the Commercial Lots adjacent to Meander Road. No pylon sign shall be permitted along the frontage of Meander Road. The monument sight shall meet the requirements for monument signs in the CH district. iii. Any wall sign on the north or east elevation of the building on Lot 2, Block 2 shall not be internally illuminated. iv. No wall sign shall be permitted above the first story of the north elevation of the building on Lot 1, Block 2. v. No wall sign shall be permitted above the second story of the east elevation of the building on Lot 1, Block 2. vi. Projecting signs shall be permitted, provided adequate clearance is provided and that the area of such signs is included within the allowed area of wall signage for the building in question. E. The owner(s) of the Commercial Lots shall implement active parking management practices consistent with a plan approved by the City Council at the time of final plat review. Off-site parking and shuttling shall be implemented as necessary for larger events within the Event Venue and Conservatory. If the City determines, in its sole discretion, that such active parking management is inadequate, the owner(s) shall implement additional practices to the satisfaction of City staff or limit attendance at events as necessary based on parking supply. Such determination by the City will be communicated to the owner(s) in writing, and thereafter the owner(s) will be provided 60 days to adequately address the inadequacies to the City’s satisfaction. Section 7. The City of Medina Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to place this ordinance into effect and to make the appropriate changes to the official zoning map of the City of Medina to reflect the change in zoning classifications as set forth above only upon recording of the Meander Park and Boardwalk plat. Ordinance No. ### 4 DATE Section 8. A copy of this ordinance and the updated map shall be kept on file at the Medina City Hall. Section 9. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, publication, and recording of the Meander Park and Boardwalk plat. Adopted by the Medina City Council this ____ day of ______, 2023. CITY OF MEDINA By: Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: By: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk Published in the Crow River News on this day the ____ of __________, 2023. Ordinance No. ### 5 DATE EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property Ordinance No. ### 6 DATE EXHIBIT B Map Depicting “Commercial” and “Twinhome” Lots Resolution No. 2023-## January 17, 2023 Member ________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-## RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. ### BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance establishing a planned unit development district for “Meander Park and Boardwalk” and amending the official zoning map; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statues § 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publications by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and WHEREAS, the ordinance is six pages in length and contains a map; and WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina that the city clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. ### to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the ordinance in its entirety: Public Notice The city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ##, an ordinance establishing a planned unit development district for “Meander Park and Boardwalk.” The ordinance rezones property located at 1472 Highway 55, which is proposed to be subdivided and developed as to planned unit development. The development includes four residential lots north of Meander Road and four commercial lots south of Meander Road. The ordinance establishes regulations related land use of the property and standards for the design and construction of the development. The full text of the ordinance is available from the city clerk at Medina city hall during regular business hours. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina that the city clerk keep a copy of the ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that she post a full copy of the ordinance in a public place within the city. Resolution No. 2023-## 2 DATE Dated: January 17, 2023. ______________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ________ upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2023-## January 17, 2023 Member _________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-## RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PUD GENERAL PLAN APPROVAL FOR MEANDER PARK AND BOARDWALK WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Medina Ventures, LLC (the “Applicant”) owns property at 1472 State Highway 55 (the “Property”), located north of Highway 55 and east of Arrowhead Drive, which is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested approval of a planned unit development general plan and preliminary plat to subdivide and develop the Property into four commercial lots, four twinhome lots, and outlots to contain common improvements and space; and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat is tentatively proposed to be called Meander Park and Boardwalk; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, reviewed the information provided by the Applicant and City staff, heard testimony from interested parties, and recommended approval of the general plan and preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2023, the Planning Commission reviewed updated architectural information provided by the Applicant, accepted testimony from interested parties, and recommended approval of the general plan and preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, on December 6, 2022 and January 17, 2023, the City Council reviewed the proposed general plan and preliminary plat, considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and heard additional testimony; and WHEREAS, regarding the purpose of the Planned Unit Development regulations, the City Council finds that the proposed Planned Unit Development: a. encourages a variety of uses to support economic expansion and a more efficient use of land; b. allows higher standards and more desirable building design; c. results in limited need for additional utilities or streets and therefor lowers future public investments; d. effectuates the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan; and e. results in a more desirable and creative environmental than might be possible through strict application of zoning and subdivision regulations. Resolution No. 2023-## 2 DATE WHEREAS, subject to the fulfillment of the conditions noted below, the City Council makes the following findings of fact regarding the preliminary plat based on the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance: a. The proposed preliminary plat is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and is not premature for consideration. b. The subdivision is appropriate for the physical conditions on the site including the topography, storm water, natural resources, and soils. c. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development and meets minimum lot size standards. d. The proposed subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage. e. The proposed subdivision is not likely to be injurious to public health. f. The proposed subdivision and its improvements will not conflict with public or private streets, easements, or right-of-ways. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby grants approval of the PUD general plan and preliminary plat approval for Meander Park and Boardwalk, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1) The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include the conditions described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy. 2) The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated 10/20/2022 and 09/09/2022 except as may be modified herein. The plans shall be updated to address the comments of the City Engineer and submitted for review in connection with final plat application. 3) The Applicant shall construct turn lane improvements on Meander Road as recommended by the City Engineer. 4) The Applicant shall execute and record instrument(s) in a form and of substance satisfactory to the City Attorney to ensure all lots have access to a public roadway. 5) The Applicant shall dedicate a trail easement along the north of Meander Road right-of- way and construct the trail to the crossing at the commercial access. The Applicant shall also pay $64,640 cash-in-lieu of additional parkland dedication. 6) The Applicant shall update plans to provide a secondary emergency access, the design of which shall be subject to approval by the Fire Chief and City Engineer. This emergency access shall maintained/plowed to ensure usability. 7) The Applicant shall submit emergency vehicle turning exhibits and adjust parking lot layout as necessary to ensure adequate circulation to the satisfaction of City staff. 8) Vehicle-resistant barriers or fencing shall be provided between Meander Road and the play area for the daycare. 9) The Applicant shall update plans to provide landscaping adjacent to the retail and restaurant buildings. 10) The Applicant shall update lighting plans such that light does not exceed 0.5 FC at the property line. 11) The plat shall dedicate drainage and utility easements over all water mains and hydrants, over stormwater improvements and in other locations recommended by the City Engineer. 12) The watermain and hydrants within the commercial lots shall be privately maintained. Resolution No. 2023-## 3 DATE 13) The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site improvements in order to ensure completion. 14) The Applicant shall execute and record a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney to describe the responsibility of the property owners to maintain the private stormwater improvements. 15) The PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat shall be contingent upon approval and implementation of a Wetland Conservation Act Wetland Replacement Plan. 16) The Applicant shall establish Upland Buffers in the locations identified on the General Plan of Development. Such buffers shall meet the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance including but not limited to: execution and recordation of Upland Buffer Easement Agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney, planting of appropriate vegetation, and installation of signage. 17) The commercial property shall be subject to the City’s lawn and landscaping irrigation regulations. No lawn or landscape irrigation systems shall be permitted to be connected to the City water system. 18) The Applicant shall update the architectural design of the restaurant and retail buildings to provide additional architectural elements to break up the roofline. 19) The Applicant shall update the architectural design of the twinhomes to provide architectural elements to break up the roofline. 20) The Applicant shall obtain all permits required by Elm Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council and any other relevant agencies. 21) The Applicant shall enter into a petition and waiver with the City in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney related to future assessment for construction of Tamarack Drive. 22) The Applicant shall provide proof of agreement(s) for off-site parking during peak usage that meets the satisfaction of the City. 23) The Applicant shall provide for ongoing active management of the lodging facilities located on the commercial property. 24) Building plans shall be subject to review and approval by City staff for general compliance with the general plan of development and design standards document dated 12/22/2022, except as required to be modified herein. 25) The Applicant shall provide title evidence prior to or at the time of final plat application and abide by the recommendations of the City Attorney with regard to title matters and recording instructions. 26) The final plat application shall be filed within 180 days from the date of this resolution or the approval hereby granted shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council. 27) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, general plan of development, construction plans, and other relevant documents. Resolution No. 2023-## 4 DATE Dated: January 17, 2023. By: ______________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: By: ___________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2023-## 5 DATE EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property Chapter 2 – Vision and Community Goals Page 2 - 1 Adopted October 2, 2018 Chapter 2: VISION & COMMUNITY GOALS _______________________________________________________________________________________________ The Vision and Community Goals chapter is the heart of the Comprehensive Plan and provides the foundation from which City officials make consistent and supporting land use decisions. This chapter includes a set of general community goals that guided the creation of this Plan. The concepts in this chapter are some of the few static elements of the Comprehensive Plan. If land uses change or other infrastructure varies from the Plan, decisions will be founded in the goals set forth below. The Vision and Goals were created with the involvement of the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee (the “Steering Committee”), City officials, and residents of Medina and are broadly supported. Land use designations are subject to strong social and economic pressures to change. Accordingly, it is appropriate that such systems be periodically evaluated in light of changing social and economic conditions. As development evolves, the Vision and Goals will provide the guidance for accomplishing the vision for the future of the community even when changes are necessary to the land use plan. Detailed objectives and recommendations are contained within each of the subject chapters of this plan. Creating the Vision and Goals The residents, the Steering Committee, City officials and staff participated in the planning process for the Plan. A series of public participation meetings were conducted to introduce and solicit information from the residents of Medina. The Steering Committee held work sessions that focused on integrating the concerns and desires of the community together with accommodating growth and regional impacts. An online forum provided additional opportunity for residents to impact the Vision and Community Goals as they were formulated. In addition to land use and growth planning, the City implemented open space, natural resources, and infrastructure planning. The goals which guided this process are integrated into this chapter. Each element of this plan was developed with assistance from city officials and a diverse group of community stakeholders producing a truly representative plan. The City made a conscious decision to emphasize natural resources and open space conservation. Chapter 2 – Vision and Community Goals Page 2 - 2 Adopted October 2, 2018 Community Vision The following statement provides a vision of the community for the future and the resultant goals and strategies. Medina is a community united by a common goal: to sustain and enhance the quality of life of its residents. Medina will protect its significant natural resources and open space throughout the City, while honoring its rural heritage and fostering safe and well-designed neighborhoods, places of recreation and destinations for citizens to gather. Development within the City will be commensurate with available transportation systems, municipal services and school capacity. Community Goals The following Community Goals are derived from the Vision Statement and inform objectives and strategies throughout the various aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. • Preserve rural vistas, open spaces, and wetlands in all parts of the community to promote the rural character of Medina. • Protect and enhance the environment and natural resources throughout the community. • Encourage and incent innovative and environmentally friendly approaches to planning, engineering and development. • Expand urban services only as necessary to accommodate regionally forecasted residential growth, desired business opportunities and achievement of other Community Goals. Such development and growth shall be at a sustainable pace proportionate with capacity of schools and transportation, water supply and wastewater infrastructure available to the City. • Spread development so that it is not geographically concentrated during particular timeframes. • Promote public and private gathering places and civic events that serve the entire community. • Preserve and expand trails and parks to provide community recreational facilities, connect neighborhoods, and encourage healthy lifestyles of its residents. • Provide opportunities for a diversity of housing at a range of costs to support residents at all stages of their lives. • Encourage an attractive, vibrant business community that complements the residential areas of the City. • Maintain its commitment to public safety through support of the City’s police department and coordinate with its contracted volunteer fire departments. • Manage the City through prudent budgeting processes, retaining a skilled and efficient staff and long-range planning and financial management. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 4 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 4 While these ordinance standards help protect solar access, it is not possible for every part of a building or lot to obtain unobstructed solar access. Mature trees, topography, and the location of structures can limit solar access. However, on most properties the rooftop of the principal building would be free of shading by adjacent structures. Therefore, the majority of property owners in the City could utilize solar energy systems, if they so desired, as a supplement or alternative to conventional fuels. HHiissttoorriicc PPrreesseerrvvaattiioonn The City of Medina currently does not have any sites or structures listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The City of Medina has a strong interest in preserving representative portions of its history. The City previously worked with the West Hennepin Pioneer Museum to restore the Wolsfeld Family cabin which was originally built in 1856. It is thought to be one of the original homes in Medina. The City further commits to providing the following general guidelines related to historical preservation: • Partner with organizations that want to preserve historically significant areas, landmarks, and buildings in Medina; • Modify zoning regulations as necessary to help preserve areas that may be historically significant. FFuuttuurree GGeenneerraall LLaanndd UUssee PPoolliiccyy DDiirreeccttiioonn As described in the Vision Statement, the City of Medina strives to promote and protect its open spaces and natural environment. The City has historically been, and intends to continue to be, primarily a rural community. The City has planned for a limited amount of future development consistent with regional forecast and consistent with Community Goals. Future Land Use Plan Principles The Future Land Use Plan guides the development of Medina through 2040, and will be used to implement the City’s goals, strategies and policies. The Plan is guided by the Vision and Community Goals as furthered by the following principles: Development Patterns and Neighborhood Form • Encourage open spaces, parks and trails in all neighborhood developments. Surveys indicate that a high quality of life is found when residents have visual access to green spaces. • Create neighborhoods with a variety of housing types that are well connected with roads, trails or sidewalks. • Maintain the integrity of rural neighborhoods and promote development patterns consistent with existing rural residential development. • Recognize neighborhood characteristics and promote new development compatible in scale, architectural quality and style with existing neighborhoods. • Stage residential growth to minimize the amount of adjacent developments which occur within the same time period. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 5 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 5 • Guide density to areas with proximity to existing infrastructure and future infrastructure availability. • Concentrate higher density development near service oriented businesses to help promote walkability. • Consider planned development in surrounding communities when making land use decisions in the City. Road Patterns • Recognize regional highway capacity and planned improvements, along with use forecasts, as major factors in planning for growth and land use changes. • Establish collector streets with good connections through the community’s growth areas. • Promote trails and sidewalk access near roads and thoroughfares to encourage multi- modal transportation choices. • Consider opportunities to improve north-south travel within the City. Open Spaces and Natural Resources • Preserve natural resources throughout the community and provide educational opportunities to residents to help them understand the value of natural areas. • Preserve open spaces and natural resources. • Protect wooded areas and encourage improvement of existing resources and reforestation. Evaluate existing woodland protections and supplement as necessary. • Support the guidelines identified in the Open Space Report to preserve the City’s natural systems. Business Districts and Commercial Areas • Focus service businesses and development near urban residential densities and along primary transportation corridors. • Provide connections between residents and commercial areas and promote businesses within mixed-use areas. • Work to create job opportunities in the community for Medina residents to reduce traffic and commuting demands. • Emphasize service and retail uses which serve the needs of the local community and provide opportunities for the community to gather. • Support business development with a corporate campus style which provides open spaces and protects natural resources. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 6 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 6 TThhee GGuuiiddee PPllaann Medina's Future Land Use Plan, Map 5-3, maintains Medina’s rural character and protects the City's natural resources while accommodating limited growth and development which is consistent with the City’s Vision, Community Goals and Land Use Principles. Table 5-2 below demonstrates the expected 2040 land uses in the community. TABLE 5-2 FUTURE LAND USE PLAN Future Land Use (2040) Gross Acreage % Net Acreage % Rural Residential 8,402.2 49.1% 6,015.3 35.1% Agriculture 222.7 1.3% 174.5 1.0% Future Development Area 671.9 3.9% 547.9 3.2% Low Density Residential 1172.5 6.8% 865.7 5.1% Medium Density Residential 58.5 0.3% 46.2 0.3% High Density Residential 29.6 0.2% 25.7 0.2% Mixed Residential 137.1 0.8% 94.1 0.6% Uptown Hamel 45.0 0.3% 41.2 0.2% Commercial 254.2 1.5% 197.6 1.2% Business 704.6 4.1% 471.9 2.8% Rural Commercial 67.5 0.4% 47.6 0.3% Institutional 270.2 1.6% 194.0 1.1% Parks, Recreation, Open Space 2,771.5 16.2% 1,971.2 11.5% Private Recreation 343.1 2.0% 297.5 1.7% Closed Sanitary Landfill 192.2 1.1% 124.7 0.7% Right-of-Way 673.1 3.9% 616.9 3.6% Total Acres 16,015.9 11,732.0 Lakes and Open Water* 1,104.6 6.5% 1,104.6 6.5% Wetlands and Floodplain 4,283.9 25.0% Total City 17,120.5 17,120.5 * Lakes and Open Water amounts include areas adjacent to lakes which are not included in Hennepin County parcel data and exclude un-meandered lakes. The Growth and Development Map (Map 5-4) highlights areas within the City in which a change of land use is contemplated by the Future Land Use plan. The map also highlights wetland areas within Medina which significantly affect land planning, development, and infrastructure decisions. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 7 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 7 Future Land Use Designations Rural Residential (RR) identifies areas for low-intensity uses, such as rural residential, hobby farms, agricultural, horticulture, conservation of ecologically significant natural resources and passive recreation. Density within the RR land use shall be no more than one lot per 10 acres and the area is not planned to be served by urban services during the timeframe covered by this Plan. Agricultural (AG) identifies areas which are planned for long-term agricultural uses. Density within the land use can be no more than one lot per 40 acres which will not be served by urban services. Property within this land use is eligible to be part of the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Program. Future Development Area (FDA) identifies areas which could potentially be planned for future urban development in the City that will be provided municipal sewer and water services. This area will remain rural unless and until designated for urban services in a future Comprehensive Plan update. The purpose of the FDA designation is to communicate the future planning intentions to the community. This designation is tentative and depends greatly on future infrastructure improvements, including to regional highway capacity. Low Density Residential (LDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 2.0 units per acre and 3.0.units per acre which are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The primary use in this area is single- and two-family residential development. Medium Density Residential (MDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 5.0 and 7.0 units per acre that are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The primary uses in this designation will be a mix of housing such as single-family residential, twin homes, town homes, row homes, and small multiple family buildings. High Density Residential (HDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 12.0 and 15.0 units per acre that are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The primary uses will include town homes, apartment buildings and condominiums which should incorporate some open space or an active park. Mixed Residential (MR) identifies residential land uses that may be developed with a variety of housing styles at an overall average density between 3.5 and 4.0 units per net acre, within which a minimum of the units equivalent to 1.0 unit per acre are required to be developed at higher densities above 8.0 units per acre. Uses within the MR land use are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The land use provides flexibility for the type of housing to be developed, including detached single family, twin homes, townhomes and multiple family buildings. The MR land use will allow for different types of housing to be developed in coordination with each other or independently, provided the objectives related to overall density and minimum number of higher density housing units can be achieved within a defined area. Uptown Hamel (UH) the Uptown Hamel land use allows residential and commercial uses to be mixed on adjacent sites and to be mixed within the same building or property. Residential development in this designation may be between 4.0 and 15.0 units per acre. The Uptown Hamel area is served by urban services. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 8 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 8 Commercial (C) provides areas for highway oriented businesses and retail establishments including commercial, office and retail uses. These uses are concentrated along the arterial corridors and are served or will be served by urban services. Business (B) provides opportunities for corporate campus uses including office, warehouse, and light industrial. This designation identifies larger tracts of land that are suitable for office and business park developments and are served or will be served by urban services. Rural Commercial (RC) identifies commercial land uses which are not served by urban services, but rather by individual wells and septic systems. The scale of development in this land use shall be limited to protect water resources. Institutional (INST) identifies existing public, semi-public, and non-profit uses such as governmental, cemeteries, religious, educational and utilities. Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) identifies publicly owned or permanently conserved land which is used for park, recreational, or open space purposes. Private Recreation (PREC) identifies areas that are currently used for outdoor recreational uses which are held under private ownership but are not publicly maintained. Limited numbers of residential uses may be included or have previously been developed within this land use designation, accounting for no more than 10% of the land area. Density within the residential portion of the use shall be between 2.0 and 3.0 units per net acre where urban services are available and one unit per 10 acres where services are not available. The City does not anticipate additional residential development within the land use. Closed Sanitary Landfill (SL) identifies an existing closed sanitary landfill. The Woodlake Landfill is owned by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) as part of Minnesota’s Closed Landfill Program. The MPCA has jurisdiction over land use regulations of the landfill and has made available a description of the types, locations, and potential movement of hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants, or decomposition gases related to the facility in its Closed Landfill Plan. The City hereby incorporates such information and the City will provide such information as required by law. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 13 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 13 UUrrbbaann SSeerrvviiccee DDeessiiggnnaattiioonnss The Urban Service Area includes the residential and commercial areas of the City that are currently or will be served by municipal water and sewer services. Residential Uses Objectives: 1. Require preservation of natural slopes, wetlands, woodlands, and other significant natural characteristics of the property. 2. Consider exceptions to or modifications of density restrictions for developments that protect the natural features or exceed other standards of the zoning district. Such modification shall generally not exceed -10% of the minimum density or +20% of the maximum density requirement of the relevant land use. 3. Restrict urban development to properties within the sewer service boundary. 4. Regulate land within the Mixed Residential land use to provide opportunities for residential development with a density in excess of 8 units/acre. Flexibility is purposefully provided within the land use to support opportunities for a single project to provide both low- and high- density housing or for multiple developers to partner on independent projects within a Mixed Residential area. 5. Encourage green building practices such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) principles in neighborhood planning and residential building and low impact development design standards. 6. Regulate the rate and location of development in keeping with availability of public facilities and the City's stated goals, including the undesignated MUSA and growth strategies. 7. Restrict commercial and business development to areas designated in this Plan. 8. Protect property within the City's MUSA boundary from development prior to the provision of urban services that will hinder future division. 9. Create flexible zoning standards that would allow for innovative arrangements of homes, conservation easements, or other creative land use concepts that preserve the City's open space and natural features. 10. Promote attractive, well-maintained dwellings on functional, clearly marked roads, with adequate facilities and open space. 11. Emphasize resident and pedestrian safety. 12. Encourage a controlled mix of densities, housing types, age groups, economic levels, lot sizes, and living styles that are of appropriate scale and consistent with appropriate land use, market demands, and development standards. 13. Establish design criteria for platting and developing site plans which will be compatible with surrounding physical features, existing land uses and the preservation of Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 14 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 14 ecologically significant natural resources. 14. Establish standards for higher density residential development so that such development is compatible with surrounding uses. Such standards may include enclosed parking, green space, landscape buffering and height limitations. 15. Require utilities to be placed underground wherever possible for reasons of aesthetic enhancement and safety. 16. Plan interconnections between separate developments to encourage shared road use to reduce costs and minimize the amount of road surface required. 17. Require planning of trails and walkway systems in the early design stages of all new development so that residential areas are provided safe access to parks and open space. 18. In urban residential zones with sanitary sewer service permit higher density in PUD’s in exchange for (1) reduced land coverage by buildings, (2) provision of more multi-family units; and, (3) sensitive treatment of natural resources. 19. Implement standards for lot sizes and setbacks which recognize the development characteristics and natural resources of each existing neighborhood. 20. Regulate noise, illumination, and odors as needed to protect residential neighborhoods and to maintain public health and safety. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth Page 5- 16 Adopted October 2, 2018 Page 5- 16 Commercial Uses The following objectives refer to commercial land uses which will provide a variety of retail products and services mixed with smaller offices. Objectives: 1. Require preservation of natural slopes, wetlands, woodlands, and other significant natural characteristics of the property. 2. Provide convenient and attractive shopping and services to meet the needs of City residents. 3. Encourage businesses that benefit the local community by providing employment opportunities offering convenience goods and services, utilizing high quality design, and having limited impact on public services. 4. Require commercial activities that serve the broader metropolitan market to have access to a regional highway or frontage road. 5. Regulate the impact of commercial development along the border between commercially and residentially guided areas to ensure that commercial property has a minimal impact on residential areas. 6. Regulate construction to ensure high quality, energy and resource efficient buildings and to promote such Green Building standards as LEED Certifications or the State of Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines: Buildings, Benchmarks and Beyond (B-3) standards. 7. Encourage construction that enhances the visual appeal of TH 55 corridor and the rural vistas and open spaces of the City. 8. Establish standards for the commercial area north of TH 55 at Tamarack Drive which results in a high quality, walkable and appropriately scaled development which complements nearby residential neighborhoods, emphasizes goods and services for local residents over highway users and provides gathering opportunities for the community. 9. Require frontage roads that do not directly access arterial roadways and limit access to arterial and collector roadways. 10. Limit the scale of commercial development where urban services are not available to protect water resources and to integrate such uses with surrounding rural lands. 11. Use the site plan review process to ensure that commercial and industrial uses are compatible with neighboring future and existing uses, and with the adjoining public streets and highways. PUD’s may be used to help accomplish this policy. 12. Emphasize pedestrian safety. 13. Require utilities to be placed underground wherever possible for reasons of aesthetic enhancement and safety. 14. Regulate noise, illumination, and odors as needed to maintain public health and safety. HIGHWAY 55 ")55 ")24 ")19 ")101 ")116 ")11 ")24 ")19 £¤12 HAMEL RD MEDINA RD PIONEER TRL TAMARACK DR WILLOW DR HACKAMORE RD ARROWHEAD DR HOMESTEAD TRL CHIPPEWA RD HUNTER DR PARKVIEW DR BROCKTON LN N MEANDER RD EVERGREEN RD BROCKTON LN N CHIPPEWA RD WILLOW DR WILLOW DR HUNTER DR ")55 Katrina Independence Mooney School Peter Spurzem Holy Name Half Moon Wolsfeld Krieg Winterhalter Miller Thies Ardmore Map 5-3Future Land Use Plan 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Map Date: October 2, 2018 Legend Future Land Use Rural Residential Agricultural Future Development Area Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed Residential Uptown Hamel Commercial Business Rural Commercial Institutional Private Recreational Park, Recreational, and Open Space Closed Sanitary Landfill HIGHWAY 55 ")55 ")24 ")19 ")101 ")116 ")11 ")24 ")19 £¤12 HAMEL RD MEDINA RD PIONEER TRL TAMARACK DR WILLOW DR HACKAMORE RD ARROWHEAD DR HOMESTEAD TRL CHIPPEWA RD HUNTER DR PARKVIEW DR BROCKTON LN N MEANDER RD EVERGREEN RD BROCKTON LN N CHIPPEWA RD WILLOW DR WILLOW DR HUNTER DR ")55 Katrina Independence Mooney School Peter Spurzem Holy Name Half Moon Wolsfeld Krieg Winterhalter Miller Thies Ardmore Map 5-4Development and Growth Plan 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Map Date: October 2, 2018 Legend Future Land Use Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed Residential Uptown Hamel Commercial Business Wetland Locations Wetland Locations Medina City Council Excerpt from 12/6/2022 Minutes 1 Medina Venture – Medina Park and Boardwalk – 1472 Highway 55 – PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat (8:12 p.m.) Cavanaugh commented that he does not have a financial interest in this project but because he owns an adjacent property he has been advised to abstain from this item. Johnson stated that the applicant is requesting a PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat for the property which includes commercial development and four townhome units on the subject property. Finke stated that this proposed development would include a PUD and Preliminary Plat noting that the subject site is a single parcel bisected by Meander Road with the parcel to the south guided for commercial development and the parcel to the north designated for residential development. He stated that the commercial portion would propose an event venue, restaurant, and daycare facility. He stated that four twinhomes, in two buildings, are proposed for the northern parcel and were originally contemplated to be lodging units. He stated that the Planning Commission recommended that the units north of Meander be maintained as single- family residential units. He explained that the Council must decide if a PUD would be appropriate, providing flexibility in some regulations in return for a better project. He displayed the proposed site plan and identified the proposed access. He reviewed the proposed building elevations and noted updated renderings that could include lodging units on the southern parcel. He stated that staff would request that this item ultimately be tabled in order to better review the updated plans with the new lodging but still wanted input from the Council. He provided a comparison between the underlying zoning standards and what is proposed, noting deviations. He also provided details on the proposed parking, noting that some of the uses within the site would have different peak times of use. He stated that the applicant has stated that they would utilize shuttle service and valet parking for large events. He reviewed the proposed layout for the twinhomes proposed north of Meander Road noting the various flexibilities requested. He provided the newly proposed elevations for the event venue with lodging. He stated that the applicant is not proposing any wetland impacts for the development itself, although there would be impacts for the road and trail. He provided details on the required wetland buffers for the north and south and the averaging proposed by the applicant. He referenced the landscaping and water feature to the southwest of the event venue noting that the feature would be within the buffer but would not encourage trespassing into the buffer. He noted that some of the area required for the northern buffer would be proposed in a larger amount on the southern portion. He stated that staff and the Park Commission recommend the trail continuation on the north side of Meander Road and for the remainder of park dedication to be accepted as cash in lieu, estimated between $50,000 and $75,000. He stated that the report also mentions the Diamond Lake Regional Trail (DLRT) corridor and it was determined that this parcel was too far west and therefore trail easements were not recommended for that purpose. He stated that the Planning Commission held a public hearing in November and the comments received at that time and prior to tonight’s meeting were provided to the Council for review. He noted that a majority of the comments were related to the proposal for lodging units north of Meander and the Commission responded in recommending that those units be used as single- family residential with an allowance for lodging in the southern portion of the development. Martin referenced the daycare setback related to the feel of the streetscape for Meander. She asked to what degree buildings on Meander are setback from the right-of-way and paved area of the street. She asked how far from the paved area this proposed 12-foot setback would be. Finke replied that the commercial highway district requires a 25-foot front yard setback while the residential units would have a similar setback, but most are setback 35 to 40 feet. He stated Medina City Council Excerpt from 12/6/2022 Minutes 2 that the setback is measured from the right-of-way line and therefore the driving lane for the street would be a distance into the right-of-way that would vary dependent upon the orientation of the road and turn lanes along Meander. He estimated about ten feet of boulevard from the edge of the street to the right-of-way, therefore the building would be about 22 feet from the curb line. He commented that Meander Road has a speed limit of 40 mph with slower speeds near curves and noted that the road serves a more local purpose. He stated that staff discussed whether it would make sense to consider a lower speed for the road as more development occurs. Albers referenced the Planning Commission discussion related to lodging and asked where that would be proposed on the commercial site. Finke provided the new conceptual elevation that would provide for 16 lodging units above the event center. Albers stated that he would prefer to keep the lodging on the commercial site. Finke commented that the architectural design could be softened in order to mitigate the additional height of that building. Martin commented that she dislikes lodging on the northern parcel regardless of whether it is allowed on the southern property. She stated that she would contemplate on allowing some lodging on the southern parcel but would not necessarily approve two stories of lodging on that facility. DesLauriers agreed. Albers also agreed. Martin noted that the Council did review the public comments received prior to the meeting tonight and therefore those comments do not need to be repeated. She stated that those comments could be limited to be in support of a previous statement. Albers noted that although this is not a public hearing, the Council would still provide the opportunity for the public to make comments. He stated that he would first provide an opportunity for the applicant to speak. Chris Pederson, applicant, noted that he also lives about 400 feet from the proposed development site. He stated that he appreciated the feedback received from the previous concept plan review and they have been working on this proposal for over one year. He stated that his proposal attempts to bring amenities that are desired by Medina residents to this area. He noted that the event center, restaurant, water feature and boardwalk would utilize the beauty of the site and wetlands within the developable area and preserve the wetlands on the site. He appreciated the comments received at the public hearing in November, even though it was a bit negative, as it allowed them to tweak their plans. He stated that there is a need for lodging in the area and they would want to allow lodging onsite, at least for the wedding party, when building a high-end venue. He stated that the lodging piece is an important piece that provides an amenity to the venue. He stated that there are different businesses that will find a home in the mixed retail building and there is a need for daycare in the area. He noted that each piece of the development was designed with intention. He stated that the water feature provides screening of both sound and sight from Highway 55. Medina City Council Excerpt from 12/6/2022 Minutes 3 Martin referenced the 12-foot setback proposed for the daycare and the potential of lowering speeds along Meander. She asked and confirmed that the applicant would not have issue with that. She stated that she lacks a sense of justification for the increased density on the northern side and reduced wetland setback and asked why three units would not be sufficient rather than four. She asked for details on the number of lodging units proposed in the commercial area. Pederson replied that there is more symmetry in having two twinhomes rather than attempting to fit three single-family homes. He stated that there is a minimal amount of space and the allowance to have raised decks would allow residents to enjoy the beauty of the wetland. He noted that they would propose a fence to keep people out of the buffer area. He stated that they did attempt to work with the adjacent landowner for access, but they were not able to do so and therefore would have to build a new road for access. He stated that a floor layout was provided for the proposed lodging with eight units on each floor, noting that the original concept proposed 12 bedrooms between the homes on the north. He stated they would not be adding stories to the conservatory, and they would not be placing units above the ballroom as that would require pillars which would obstruct the ballroom. He admitted that the design is not yet aesthetically pleasing but noted that they wanted to provide a concept for consideration to build off. Martin commented that there were 12 bedrooms proposed between the four townhome units and there are now 16 hotel rooms proposed. She asked the bed versus bed comparison, specifically whether four persons could be accommodated per room. Pederson replied that the rooms as proposed would be about 350 to 450 square feet each and therefore that could be a bit tight for two beds. He noted that ideally, he would like to have some larger rooms to provide more of a suite. He stated that the townhomes would have accommodated up to 24 people and as proposed 16 rooms could essentially accommodate 32 people noting that if they did convert some rooms to suites that capacity would be reduced. DesLauriers asked if the lodging would be required in the applicant’s mind in order to move forward. Pederson replied that the building itself will be very expensive and if people are going to pay high-end prices, they would not want to travel 20 minutes for lodging. He stated that lodging would generate those funds in Medina, as well as the jobs. He stated that they would not operate it as a hotel but more as an Airbnb. He used the example of an executive visiting Loram or Polaris, which are nearby, that perhaps book the lodging while there is an event going on and explained that they could go to their rooms without disturbing the event. DesLauriers stated that in the case there is a large event of 300 people, and they are shuttled from Loram, how would they prevent people from parking on the residential streets. Pederson stated that he lives in the neighborhood and would personally be able to track that to ensure it is not happening. He stated that they could use signage and the venue materials would provide rules and regulations for event parking. He stated that if there were a big event on a weekend, they would provide shuttle service to the Loram parking lot and would anticipate that from the beginning rather than responding once the lot is full. George Stickney, BPS Properties and developer of Marsh Point Preserve, stated that he likes the overall concept with three homes for sale and opposes the lodging use on the northern Medina City Council Excerpt from 12/6/2022 Minutes 4 parcel. He thanked the applicant and staff for responding to the comments at the public hearing in November as all of the units on that side of the road are owner occupied homes and do not want short-term rentals for those homes. He stated that he does have a petition opposing short- term rentals on the northern parcel but noted that they would support the homes being for sale or leased with a minimum term of one year. He was surprised to see that Medina did not have regulations related to short-term rentals. Elizabeth Sedgewick, 4182 Arrowhead Drive, asked for the materials on the face of the building. Finke reviewed the materials proposed for the commercial buildings and the twinhomes. Stickney commented that they like the design of the homes with the exception of the party terrace. Sedgewick commented that she believes this site is scrunched to fit in the site where security would be needed. She commented that it seems like quite a concept for a property that would have exhaust, railroad noise, and vehicle noise. Tim Newgard, 4115 Cavanaugh Drive, commented that he did make some heated comments at the last meeting related to the short-term rentals. He stated that he would prefer to see the residential homes be two stories and not three stories as his home is not three stories. Joe Cavanaugh, 375 Lakeview Road, commented that he believes that this would be a great project that would bring desired amenities to this area. He stated that the only concern he would have would be with parking and would want to ensure that is controlled to ensure parking does not spill into neighboring residential areas. He did not believe the lodging units had been factored into the parking calculation. He stated that he would like to see active management of the lodging units. Pederson commented that most often the people using the lodging would be attending the venue for an event. He stated that although they are not calling the lodging a hotel, they would have onsite management of those units. Sedgewick commented that they respond when they hear accidents at Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive. She commented that alcohol is sometimes a factor and would be curious to the opinion of the Police Department as alcohol would be served at the venue. She commented that Meander Road is not a land bridge and is built on wetland with compaction and lifts that provide integrity. She stated that there is a huge amount of construction traffic using Meander Road from the east and north. She asked if Meander would need improvements to support the truck traffic and catering for this venue. DesLauriers asked if there is a sidewalk planned on either side. Finke replied that the trail would continue on the north side of Meander with a sidewalk into the commercial development. He noted that ultimately the trail plan anticipates further extension of the trail to Arrowhead. Richard Mast, 4574 Bluebell Trail North, referenced a previous traffic count and the new estimation of vehicle trips. He noted that there will be three times as many vehicles, and yet no sidewalk on Meander. Medina City Council Excerpt from 12/6/2022 Minutes 5 Finke replied that there is a trail within the plan. Mast asked the plan now to install a sidewalk to protect families walking on Meander. Finke replied that the volume is lower on Meander. He explained that trails and sidewalks occur with development. He stated that staff is encouraging any feedback from the Council at this time in terms of layout or flexibility. He referenced the question of residential density raised by Martin and noted that the land use would allow for three units per acre, although the Comprehensive Plan would allow for higher density. Albers asked if there would be a need for a Conditional Use Permit with this application. Finke replied that this would be a Planned Unit Development and therefore the PUD agreement would be more intensive than a CUP. Albers asked if the Council would want to review a potential ordinance related to short-term rentals as mentioned in the public comments received. Finke replied that could be part of the overall goal setting discussion the Council will have but noted that the City does not have rental licensing so that would make the implementation of short-term rental licensing more difficult. Martin commented that she could allow more dense residential development on the north as long as it is not used for lodging, given the overall architecture of the project. She commented that the venue and restaurant uses on the south side meet many of the needs expressed in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. She stated that she could also allow the flexibilities for wetland buffers given the averaging of the buffers between the two sites. Albers and DesLauriers agreed. Moved by Martin, seconded by DesLauriers, to table the application to allow the applicant to update plans to incorporate lodging rooms into a proposed commercial building. A roll call vote was performed: Martin aye DesLauriers aye Albers aye Motion passed 3 to 0 (Council Member Cavanaugh recused himself and Council Member Reid was not present). Cavanaugh rejoined the Council. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 1/10/2023 Minutes 1 Meander Park and Boardwalk – Meander Road, East of Arrowhead Drive – Medina Ventures – PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat for Commercial Development Including Event Venue, Daycare, Restaurant and Retail (PID 0211823330003) Finke noted that the Commission reviewed this case in November and recommended approval. Plec excused himself from this discussion and vote to avoid a conflict of interest. Finke stated that this is predominantly commercial development with residential development on the northern portion of the site. He stated that originally the lodging units were proposed to be on the northern portion of the site, but concern was raised, and it was determined that the lodging should be incorporated into the commercial development and the northern units should remain strictly residential. He stated that the applicant has updated their plans as such for review. He stated that the focus tonight will be on the architectural changes and incorporation of the lodging units into the event venue space. He stated that as proposed there would be 19 rooms within the lodging space. He also highlighted architectural elements that have been updated and improved since the last review. He noted that the twinhomes have been updated to be two story homes. He stated that the materials were updated on the event venue, increasing brick and tile. He noted that staff would suggest additional modulation for the event venue and the twinhomes. Jacob asked for details on signage. Finke replied that signage has not yet been requested and therefore the standard signage regulations would apply. Chris Pederson, applicant, stated that they are attempting to create a boutique development and therefore have not yet discussed signage but could consider a larger sign for the development on the upland area. He stated that he would prefer more signage on the actual buildings. He stated that the water feature would stand tall enough to have signage for the event space. He stated that most daycare users would not be deciding to stop because of signage and therefore building signage should be sufficient. He stated that the retail and restaurant would have visibility from Highway 55 and therefore building signage should be sufficient as well. He stated that it is not his intent to have large multi-tenant signage. He stated that it is their intent to provide enough signage to alert customers but have the overall development more lowkey and boutique. Finke noted that if desired, the Commission could direct staff and the applicant to work together to present a general plan for signage prior to the Council meeting. Ahmed referenced the townhomes and asked if those would be listed for sale. Pederson confirmed that they would sell those as single-family homes to individuals. He thanked the Commission for the pivot at the November meeting to suggest lodging on the commercial side as that is a key component for the development. He stated that having the lodging component enclosed within the event center would also address the previous concern of safety for those crossing Meander to reach the units on the northern portion of the development. He recognized the signage is important for a restaurant or retail user and noted that in terms of signage they want something on the building that would be visible and would blend with the overall aesthetic of the development. Ahmed recognized that detailed signage at this point would be premature. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 1/10/2023 Minutes 2 Finke explained that the intent would be to discuss the allowable signage per frontage, noting that could be combined to have one larger sign rather than two smaller signs. He noted that they could also then discuss the building signage that would be allowed. He stated that there could be general signage requirements incorporated into the development agreement that would help to ensure the aesthetic of the development is carried through by individual users. Pederson commented that he would perhaps want a sign denoting the overall Meander Park and Boardwalk development that would fit with the rural character of the area. Jacob inquired about what vehicle-resistant fencing would entail. Finke replied that the alternative would be bollards. It was noted that securing and hardening of various locations has become common practice, so there is likely a standard for fencing intending to stand up to vehicles. Pederson commented that a daycare operator would have additional regulations they would have to meet in terms of safety, above the regulations of Medina. Finke noted that a public hearing was held in November, therefore a second public hearing is not required, and the meeting was not noticed as such. He stated that public input could still be accepted. No comments were made by the public. Popp commented that he supported much of the development proposed in November but was happy to see this compromise on the lodging. He stated that he also wanted to ensure that this pivot was still economically feasible from the perspective of the developer, which seems to be the case. He believed that all of the issues from November have been addressed and he is happy with the updates to the design. He stated that he does support the recommendation of staff for additional modulation. Jacob concurred with Popp’s comments. Ahmed had nothing new to add and wished the developer well. Rhem commented that he too would support additional modulation on the two-story addition to the event venue. Pederson provided additional details that will be on the event venue and twinhomes that he believes will provide modulation. He noted that the design of the twinhomes will be changing and stated that their desire was to receive approval for the footprint, two-stories, and number of units for the residential component. He Motion by Popp, seconded by Rhem, to recommend approval with the conditions noted in the staff report. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Nielsen and Piper) Plec rejoined the Commission. 612.388.66222324 Brewster Street St. Paul, MN 55108 info@VillamilArchitecture.com \//\ \//\VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE 12/22/22 Page 1 of 4 PUD Submittal Wood: (Min 15% - Max 25%)Brick/Tile: (Min 20% - Max 30%)Stone: (Min 2% - Max 6%) Concrete: (Min 15% - Max 25%)Glazing: (Min 25% - Max 35%) West Elevation Meander Park and Boardwalk Architectural Narrative Building Materials Meander Park and Boardwalk has a mix of uses that share a natural building material palette. The materiality of the buildings is one of natural products that exemplify the natural beauty and wear of what the natural environment provides. This is most easily understood as wood and stone, but in this case also encompasses the common construction materials that we have come to know as the basic building materials developed in the industrial revolution. These man made materials are concrete, and metal. The use of all of these materials share in a concept of showing the simple natural beauty of what can be achieved through their use architecturally. The category of real natural materials goes beyond the initial appearance of a newly built building and includes the aesthetic these materials provide as they get used and start to show wear and the natural process of an aging material. These types of materials often do not need to be painted to achieve an acceptable durability and beauty, and can be stained, sealed, or in the case of steel blackened using heat. The use of Corten steel as a facade material starts out looking like ordinary untreated metal, and the beauty of its final appearance begins through an oxidation process as it ages. The metal takes on a rusty appearance that is its natural beauty and also the reason it is protected from the elements. Sealing this material is only optional as the natural deep rust color is all it needs to last for centuries. The use of concrete should exemplify its qualities of the process of construction used to erect it. This can be illustrated as board formed concrete that shows the imprinting of the boards used in the construction of the formwork, or the exposed form tie holes left by a smoother square patterned formwork. Venue The Venue main level is composed of three main elements: The main event level, upper lodging and basement. The main event level is composed of three parts: Conservatory, Kitchen/Lounge, and Ballroom. These three parts of the building have a distinct character that breaks the long facade. They assemble in a manner where they connect seamlessly to one another yet create a visually appealing mix of different materialities. There are elements that carry throughout the building like the tall black framed doors, and other black metal accents. The Kitchen & Upper Lodging Levels have a white tile, and black brick facade. The boardwalk is the main feature tying the west facade together with large green planing walls that add a layering to the back of the building overlooking the wetlands. The Conservatory is almost entirely glass and shares a stone wall with the adjacent Kitchen/Lounge. The glass is framed with a black metal frame. The Ballroom is entirely clad with a natural vertical gapped wood facade. The west side of the building has a walkout basement with a boardwalk above that wraps the backside of the building connecting all the spaces. The basement walls are board formed concrete. The Lodging is composed of the upper two floors on the venue. The first lodging floor plan shows 9 bedrooms. The second lodging floor plan shows 5 bedrooms. The total square footage of both floors, including hallways and stairwells is 9,725 square feet. The purpose of the lodging element is first and foremost to provide on-site amenities to event venue guests, such as wedding parties who have very few options in the area to stay. Furthermore, given the upscale nature of the venue, providing onsite lodging is a critical component to make the venue competitive in the current marketplace. Lodging will also accommodate corporate travel guests as well as provide a proximal and up-to-date option for area residents’ family and friends coming in from out of town. Lastly, by providing additional lodging options to actually stay in Medina, we expect it will further benefit the City tax base, jobs and surrounding local businesses, including, but not limited to those additional businesses proposed in the Meander Park and Boardwalk PUD. The Basement in the venue is a walkout made of concrete walls. The purpose of the basement is first and foremost to allow for delivery of event equipment and supplies without having to use the main level upper entrance. It also will be used for storage of furniture and other event related equipment, easier building mechanical access as well as a space to pre-prep for future events without disturbing events happening in real time. Lastly, a portion of the basement may be used for a small data storage center that could in turn be used to help heat the building with proper engineering. 612.388.66222324 Brewster Street St. Paul, MN 55108 info@VillamilArchitecture.com \//\ \//\VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE 12/22/22 Page 2 of 4 PUD Submittal Wood: (Min 25% - Max 35%) South Elevation Corten: (Min 25% - Max 35%)Concrete: (Min 15% - Max 25%) Glazing (Min 25% - Max 30%) Mall The Mall runs parallel to HWY 55 and has two faces to it: the South-facing HWY 55, and the North-facing parking off of Meander Rd. The shops at Meander Park and Boardwalk utilize both North and South storefronts as active points of entrance for the public. The South storefronts are all connected to the boardwalk that continues to the Venue and produces a lively southerly sun lit area that connects to buildings to the slice of wetlands that runs in between the main thoroughfare of HWY 55. The South facade acts as a main storefront for signage and public activities. Both sides of the building share the same material choices and create a cohesive material palette across the North and South elevations identifying the strip mall as one row of shops that are a collective. At the same time as identifying as one row of shops they need to have distinctive materiality from the neighboring store. The different material choices should be simplified down to just a few, and alternate every other shop's elevation. The entries of the shops are an element that is shared across the storefronts. The Windows of all the buildings should be of the highest quality, meeting at a minimum of the standard commercial quality standards. The fenestrations are an important part of the appearance of the facade and overall architectural appearance. The doors and windows should be a minimum of eight feet in height and cover a significant portion of the facades creating a very transparent appearance breaking up all portions of the walls that are a storefront face of the building. The South storefronts should run glazing down to the finished floor. The horizontal partitioning of the windows should not obstruct the lower eight feet of the glazing systems creating large unobstructed views only broken by the vertical structure of the windows. 612.388.66222324 Brewster Street St. Paul, MN 55108 info@VillamilArchitecture.com \//\ \//\VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE 12/22/22 Page 3 of 4 PUD Submittal Daycare The Daycare is a representation of a simple historical schoolhouse. This iconic shape is reminiscent of a classical gable faced roof with dormers that was utilized by the settlers of the US. The wood horizontal siding covers the majority of the facade with accents created through fenestrations and entry points. North Elevation Wood: (Min 70% - Max 80%)Stone: (Min 5% - Max 10%) Glazing (Min 10% - Max 20%) Restaurant The standalone building furthest to the East should share in the patterning of the strip malls facades and be broken up by using at a minimum two distinct materials. This building should also share in the entry style of the adjacent strip mall having tall glass doors. Wood: (Min 15% - Max 40%) South Elevation Concrete: (Min 50% - Max 85%) Glazing (Min 25% - Max 30%) East Elevation Wood: (Min 80% - Max 90%)Glazing (Min 10% - Max 25%) Residential Single-Family Villas: The residence facade is a rustic wood run vertically. The entry and garage door provide accents of a brighter clean smooth wood facade. The deck and fenestrations accent a black metal finish. The total internal square footage for each of the 4 units, excluding the garage, is 2,941 sq. ft. with 4 bedrooms and 3 bathrooms. 612.388.66222324 Brewster Street St. Paul, MN 55108 info@VillamilArchitecture.com \//\ \//\VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE 12/22/22 Page 4 of 4 PUD Submittal September 8, 2022 Meander Park & Boardwalk – Medina, MN, by Medina Ventures, LLC Project Narrative Meander Park & Boardwalk is a proposed commercial planned unit development located on the north side of Highway 55, 900 feet east of Arrowhead Drive. As the over 18-acre site is surrounded by wetlands to the west and to the south, a wetland delineation was conducted in September of 2021, which revealed approximately 7 acres of developable land on the site. Access to the site is located at Meander Road on the north side of the main property. Upon submission of our initial concept plan to the city in December of 2021, Medina Ventures LLC has since received feedback from the planning commission, parks commission and city council. In addition to the initial meetings which took place from January 2022-March 2022, there have been multiple communications between the development team, SRF Consulting Group and the city planning and public works department. The site plan has since been updated to incorporate the guidance provided by the City of Medina Parks and Planning Commission as well as the City Council. Please see the SRF Supplemental Narrative for more in-depth descriptions on the technical/engineering aspects of the development. Although, there have been various notable updates to the site plan over the past 6-9 months since the concept plan was reviewed, the overall intent of Meander Park and Boardwalk remains the same: To provide a walkable, aesthetically pleasing entertainment and relaxation destination that incorporates the natural beauty of the land while providing access to desirable amenities that benefit nearby residents of Medina as well as other surrounding communities. The proposed development achieves this intent by incorporating unique design features and structural elements that we believe will add considerable long-term value to city residents, businesses and surrounding areas while supporting the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and Community Goals. The Boardwalk A meandering boardwalk that follows the natural curves of area wetlands while respecting the buffer zones will create multiple vista points for guests and serve three main purposes for the development. 1. Functionality: Provide site buildings with additional access points if they so choose as well as greater visibility and opportunities for outdoor seating and/or additional seasonal service and display areas and opportunities for local businesses and community. 2. Experience and Education: A boardwalk nestled directly adjacent to wetlands create an immersive experience for guests allowing them to interact with local wildlife and enjoy the natural beauty of the wetlands as well as be educated about the importance of their preservation through informational signage. 3. Aesthetic Beauty: A large boardwalk flanking the highly visible south and western portions of the development creates a unique design aesthetic for the entire development that sets it apart from the majority of other commercial developments in neighboring suburbs, where asphalt tends to dominate majority of the public access points. These three functions directly support multiple parts of the Comprehensive Plan’s community goals, including preserving rural vistas, open spaces, wetlands and encouraging an attractive, vibrant business community that complements residential areas of the City. Furthermore, if given prudent consideration, the boardwalk could at some point be connected to an area trail and park system to help encourage healthy lifestyles through greater community connectivity of residents. Green Space, Ponding and Plaza and Water Features The next unique component of Meander Park & Boardwalk will be to incorporate a large green space as well as ponding, plazas and water features throughout. The green space located in the southwest corner via an upland peninsula will feature trees and maintain a natural looking environment with the potential for park benches and/or a small gathering area. Ponding will be located throughout the development providing nice visuals and storm water utility. The plazas areas will create nice gathering spaces while also allowing for potential art sculptures, seasonal displays, temporary retail services or other event appropriate curated visuals. The addition and strategic placement of natural water features is a critical component to not only provide environmental beauty but also dampen nearby highway sounds and mask nearby highway visuals from guests. The green space, ponding, plazas and water features component also support the Comprehensive Plan’s community goals by preserving and creating serene open space environments. The Venue The anchor of the development will be a sprawling single story (w/basement) arts, education and entertainment venue. The venue will be majority-owned, financed and run by the developer which will not only provide a beautiful building on-site, but one that will also attract the type of businesses that a high-end, venue would lend itself to. The venue will be designed to host a wide variety of events such as weddings, celebrations of life, corporate events, small musical performances, traditional art and digital NFT art exhibitions, technology focused educational seminars, metaverse and traditional video gaming experiences, film screenings, comedy performances, botanical showcases, local fundraisers, fashion shows, keynote speaking engagements, religious celebrations, and any other cultural and community driven gatherings. Certain events will be created and produced by the venue owners themselves. The design of the building will have a focus on form and function with the intent of being able to serve a wide range of event types and thus attract a larger network of people, businesses and organizations. We believe the demographics of Medina and the surrounding communities tend to be highly educated, upper-middle class residents with an increasingly diverse population of religious, racial and ethnic backgrounds, which this venue would seek to serve through its ability to accommodate the needs of potential clients, whatever those needs may be. For example, the venue itself will feature a large, commissary kitchen that will be built to accommodate a variety of pre-approved local restaurants and caterers in the area. So, whether it be a classic mid-west meat and potatoes party, a private Diwali celebration or a vegan luncheon, the venue’s business model can provide the necessary flexibility for every type of pallet. This model is also attractive given the current state of the food service industry and the desire of many companies within that market to expand or begin to provide off-site catering. Though the venue will feature various components such as a grand ballroom, bar area, breakout suites and other modern amenities, we have gone into greater detail on a few examples below to help better illustrate an overall vision of purposeful thought. The Venue: Conservatory If meandering down a boardwalk on a fall Friday afternoon with close friends or seeing a child smile while snacking on an ice cream cone in summer isn’t enough, imagine walking through an expansive conservatory on a day with clear blue skies in the heart of a cold Minnesota winter. The conservatory will add another unique element to Meander Park and Boardwalk and serve more than just one purpose. 1. The approximately 3,000 square foot, south facing conservatory will serve as an additional feature to the venue providing a space that adds grandeur to a wedding ceremony, visceral intimacy to a celebration of life or perhaps just a little humidity and respite from the bitter cold and dryness of a cold winter’s day. 2. The conservatory will also operate with the intention of being available not just for private guests to rent out, but to be open to the public on certain occasions throughout the year such as educational field trips or design focused seminars showcasing unique ways that the venue may be heated in the winter or cooled during the summer. 3. Given the location of the conservatory in the southwest corner of the development with full visibility from Highway 55, the conservatory will serve as a stunning visual hallmark of the entire Meander Park and Boardwalk development. The Venue: Basement The basement, like other aspects of the development and venue is created with multiple purposeful intentions listed below. 1. Storage: The basement will function as a storage area for event rental equipment, furniture, maintenance supplies and other service equipment that is not always needed for every event. 2. Access: The basement will allow easy and discreet access for building maintenance and utility service. The basement service road/door will also allow delivery access for box trucks and vans to and from the venue from various vendors so as to help keep the main parking lot as free as possible for guests to arrive and park unencumbered. 3. Respite: The basement will provide an area for event staff to take breaks away from the event as well as the potential for small gatherings of guests if the occasion should arise. 4. Data storage: The basement will also be used to host computers and servers in a cooler environment while also providing the opportunity to heat to the conservatory and/or other parts of the building using heat recapture elements. The venue, it’s adjacent boardwalk, nearby open green space peninsula and conservatory components also effectively support the community goals of the Comprehensive Plan in similar ways as the previous elements, especially in the promotion of public and private gathering places and civic events that serve the entire community. Mixture of Additional Businesses on Site Although the developer will not have full control over what businesses decide to call Meander Park & Boardwalk home, we plan to market directly to the following types of businesses: Family restaurants, professional offices, cocktail lounges, breweries, indoor/outdoor food halls, daycares, salons, med spas, bakeries, ice cream shops, toy stores, fast casual food services, boutique fitness facilities, wine/craft brew shops and/or photography studios. At this stage, aside from the venue and its components, we have 3 additional building spaces on the site plan we would like to have occupied by the businesses mentioned above. Our current priority is attracting both a restaurant and daycare as we feel these two business types are critical to the development’s overall success. The restaurant is a priority given the large and ongoing demand for additional dining options in Medina and the daycare to help fill the large need for families with young children, some who continue to be on waiting lists at several daycare centers throughout the West Metro. Also, these two businesses in particular help offset parking given the former will see the most traffic on nights and weekends and the latter on weekdays alone. North Property Villas The north side of the development, which is located north of Meander Road and just west of the Fields of Medina neighborhood, is zoned Low Density Residential with some parts already described in the Site Plan section of the SRF Supplemental Narrative will feature 4 modern villas with walkout basements and rooftop terraces. The modern villas architecture are inspired to compliment the design of the venue, while also providing the guests who stay there, a unique getaway experience unlike most anything the area has to offer in terms of conventional lodging options. Furthermore, the villas will be constructed to take full advantage of the sweeping views and gorgeous sunsets taking place across the protected wetlands to the west. By developing the north and south properties at the same time, the timing impact of construction operations could be minimized and provide a better economy of scale for the entire project. Especially considering the sewer and water connections that will be required on both sides of Meander Road. www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 | 763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer September 7th, 2022 Meander Park and Boardwalk SRF supplemental narrative sections for site / civil / landscape / wetland / traffic Overview Meander Park and Boardwalk is a project located at 1472 State Highway 55, Medina, MN 55340, in the northeast quadrant of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive. The property and development spans over two parcels, split by Meander Road, highlighted by an Event Venue and surrounding commercial on the south parcel, along with a small number of residential duplexes on the north parcel. City of Medina has provided informal review and comments through a Concept PUD submittal during the first half of 2022, along with follow-up communication to provide development guidance. Zoning Existing zoning for the north parcel is RR-UR, Rural Residential Urban Reserve and the south parcel is CH, Commercial Highway. The parcels are being rezoned PUD, Planned Unit Development, to help provide review of the project to address flexibility for some non-conforming code requirements while enhancing other aspects of the project. Although rezoning to PUD, the north parcel is generally guided for R2, Residential, zoning and the south parcel is generally for CH, Commercial Highway zoning. Existing Conditions / Removals Although the total property is around 18.43 acres (north=10.15 acres, south = 8.28 acres) in size, a large wetland reduces the developable area (non-wetland) to 7.29 acres (north=1.61 acres, south=5.68), thus maximizing development potential for the limited upland area is important for he success of he project. Meander Road is a 2-lane local collector city street with a rural section including side shoulders and surface drainage to the property and wetland and splits the properties. The road and properties have a noticeable slope from east to west down to the wetland. The north property is an undeveloped grassy field with little tree growth, dominated by wetlands. The south property contains a low maintained old farmstead with an old barn and other accessory structures still standing, an active well, but no house. It also has a fair amount of volunteer trees along the perimeter of the upland area, but also dominated by wetlands, primarily to the west and south. The area north and east of the development is primarily wetland with Highway 55 to the south. The east perimeter has a small Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022 Client Page 2 60’ wide parcel that contains a gravel driveway access to a single resident farmstead and aerial utilities, however the south portion of the driveway has been abandon since Meander Road was developed. To the northeast of this 60’ corridor sits a new residential single family subdivision and to the southeast lays an undeveloped farm field slated for commercial. In general, the upland areas will contain typical land disturbance for development along with an adjacent new urban street and trail. Most of the existing volunteer trees and old structures will be removed, but the well may be reused for supplemental water for irrigation. Site Plan The development has a certain architectural look but in general is designed to be a comprehensive project with rental residential villas allowing wedding and event parties to lodge adjacent to the Event Venue, while the other commercial uses complement each other to share a commercial parking lot. A mix of retail, restaurant, and day care uses provide diversity of demand throughout the day, that helps provide adequate parking without over building. The distinguishing element that highlights the project is the elevated boardwalk at the back side of the Event Venue, Retail, and Restaurant buildings. This provides wetland views while providing other outdoor gathering areas and building access while minimizing impacts adjacent to the wetland upland buffer. The residential development will be a pair of duplexes, totaling 4 units, serviced through a shared private driveway with each unit having two levels, 2-car garage, lower-level rear walkout, and upper level deck on the back. Commercial buildings are typical single-story structures, with the exception of the Event Venue that will also have a smaller footprint lower-level basement for storage and data center, complete with a concrete pavement service route under the rear boardwalk. Sidewalks will be provided around the primary sides of the parking, along with a route through the parking lot, connecting the buildings to the parking and to the Meander Road Trail. There is a peninsula area in the southwest corner of the south parcel that at one time had property amenities proposed, but currently has been eliminated and does not have any improvement identified at this time. The Event Venue is looking at implementing a landscape water feature of waterfalls and koi ponds with enhanced landscaping to help complement the aesthetic appeal to the development. See the Site Plan sheets for additional information. Preliminary Plat The property will be subdivided into lots to represent possible sale and ownership of certain aspects of the development. The north area will have four small, attached housing residential lots around the buildings, with a common outlot owned by a Home Owners Association, or similar. Although the residential units are initially intended for rental, the platting is preparing it for sale, if this changes to individual unit ownership. The north parcel will provide typical commercial parcels for the day care, retail, and restaurant buildings and related parking, while the Event Venue will retain ownership of the rest of the site, including the storm basins and wetland areas. You will find additional info, including Drainage and Utility Easements on the Preliminary Plat sheets. Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022 Client Page 3 Access, Traffic, and Parking During concept PUD stage, the commercial driveway access was directed by the city to locate as far west as possible to provide better intersection spacing from the Meander Road / Cavanaugh Drive residential intersection to the east. Also, concept design originally indicated that the residential private driveway was opposite the commercial driveway, but City staff indicated that this should be relocated more to the east to reduce the long driveway and unnecessary improvements, while lessening the conflicts with the new left turn lane. Currently, the private drive is adjacent to the existing resident gravel driveway, just east of the property, but with very low traffic volumes coming from these two driveways, it appears to be an acceptable location. Meander Road, adjacent to the development, was directed to convert from a rural section to a curb and gutter urban section, complete with a parallel city trail extension and related boulevard. The commercial site will require a west bound left turn lane along Meander Road to help reduce traffic congestion, however the east bound traffic projections indicate that a right turn lane into the commercial site is unnecessary, including future development projections from the Tamarack Road study. The left turn lane does not have enough distance to meet MNDOT standards, so a layout to provide the best stacking, taper, and residential driveway access was provided. Shared parking has become more common, and the development is utilizing this trend to provide an appropriate parking lot, without over building it. The commercial buildings provide a compliment of different uses, with different demands to provide a working solution. When events reach a certain size, then off-site parking would most likely be required. The SRF Traffic study provide additional detail on Meander Road traffic data for turn lanes and a shared parking table indicating typical peak and 85% maximum peak ranges for parking demand. Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Grading of the properties generally includes typical commercial and residential standards with buildings and parking draining to inlets that lead to storm basins, that ultimately discharge to the wetlands. Efforts have been made to reduce grading in the wetland upland buffer areas and temporary erosion control has been provided per MPCA NPDES standards. It should be noted that the wetland floodplain elevation of 986.0’ was impacted within the north parcel area, but compensatory volume storage was provided in the south development area. See Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control plans. Stormwater The site primarily captures impervious surface stormwater runoff through storm inlets and underground piping to Stormwater BMPs and is designed to meet the regulations through cistern event center roof reuse water for irrigation, underground storm chambers, and surface basins, Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022 Client Page 4 ultimately discharging to the adjacent wetland. See the Grading and Storm Sewer Plans, along with the SRF Stormwater Report for more information. Utilities Sanitary sewer connection is provided on the north side of Meander Road, by the existing westerly residential lot, east of the gravel driveway, and watermain is basically available along the north side of Meander Road. Both the commercial and residential properties provide city owned main lines for sanitary sewer and watermain throughout the development within Drainage and Utility Easements, to allow the building service connections. Other utilities appear to be in the area, but not illustrated. See Utility Plan and Preliminary Plat sheets for more information. Tree Preservation / Landscape / Irrigation There are many existing significant volunteer trees being removed on site and have indicated that many are exempt from mitigation. Although not clearly defined, additional landscaping is provided for any required tree removal mitigation. Landscape design is basically providing native seed mixes along the wetland edge, sod around the parking and buildings, and a robust combination of trees, shrubs, and perennials in many of the remaining area of the parking and building areas. Irrigation will be design-build and irrigate the sod and planting areas but leave the native seed areas unirrigated. The irrigation system is to utilize the reuse event center roof rain water via a cistern, with supplemental water coming from the existing well on site. See Tree Preservation and Landscape Plan sheets for more information. Wetland Public improvements of Meander Road, city trail, and commercial driveway improvements have developed wetland impact. Currently wetland mitigation is scheduled through cash purchase available through banking credits. It should be noted that the project’s floodplain compensatory storage improvement does disturb the wetland area, but is viewed as a temporary impact, as it is restoring the wetland, and unclear if this would also qualify for on-site wetland mitigation for other areas. See SRF WCA application. Wetland Upland Buffer Average line has been provided on the project, providing the minimum setback, and average. In addition, the buildings have been placed outside of the Wetland Upland Buffer and the additional 15’ Primary Structure setback. The elevated decks and boardwalks are outside of the Wetland Upland Buffer, but within the Primary Structure setback, but indicate the need for flexibility that they are not a primary structure and providing some mitigation items. See SRF Wetland Buffer memo. www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 | 763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer September 7th, 2022 Meander Park and Boardwalk SRF supplemental narrative sections for site / civil / landscape / wetland / traffic Overview Meander Park and Boardwalk is a project located at 1472 State Highway 55, Medina, MN 55340, in the northeast quadrant of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive. The property and development spans over two parcels, split by Meander Road, highlighted by an Event Venue and surrounding commercial on the south parcel, along with a small number of residential duplexes on the north parcel. City of Medina has provided informal review and comments through a Concept PUD submittal during the first half of 2022, along with follow-up communication to provide development guidance. Zoning Existing zoning for the north parcel is RR-UR, Rural Residential Urban Reserve and the south parcel is CH, Commercial Highway. The parcels are being rezoned PUD, Planned Unit Development, to help provide review of the project to address flexibility for some non-conforming code requirements while enhancing other aspects of the project. Although rezoning to PUD, the north parcel is generally guided for R2, Residential, zoning and the south parcel is generally for CH, Commercial Highway zoning. Existing Conditions / Removals Although the total property is around 18.43 acres (north=10.15 acres, south = 8.28 acres) in size, a large wetland reduces the developable area (non-wetland) to 7.29 acres (north=1.61 acres, south=5.68), thus maximizing development potential for the limited upland area is important for he success of he project. Meander Road is a 2-lane local collector city street with a rural section including side shoulders and surface drainage to the property and wetland and splits the properties. The road and properties have a noticeable slope from east to west down to the wetland. The north property is an undeveloped grassy field with little tree growth, dominated by wetlands. The south property contains a low maintained old farmstead with an old barn and other accessory structures still standing, an active well, but no house. It also has a fair amount of volunteer trees along the perimeter of the upland area, but also dominated by wetlands, primarily to the west and south. The area north and east of the development is primarily wetland with Highway 55 to the south. The east perimeter has a small Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022 Client Page 2 60’ wide parcel that contains a gravel driveway access to a single resident farmstead and aerial utilities, however the south portion of the driveway has been abandon since Meander Road was developed. To the northeast of this 60’ corridor sits a new residential single family subdivision and to the southeast lays an undeveloped farm field slated for commercial. In general, the upland areas will contain typical land disturbance for development along with an adjacent new urban street and trail. Most of the existing volunteer trees and old structures will be removed, but the well may be reused for supplemental water for irrigation. Site Plan The development has a certain architectural look but in general is designed to be a comprehensive project with rental residential villas allowing wedding and event parties to lodge adjacent to the Event Venue, while the other commercial uses complement each other to share a commercial parking lot. A mix of retail, restaurant, and day care uses provide diversity of demand throughout the day, that helps provide adequate parking without over building. The distinguishing element that highlights the project is the elevated boardwalk at the back side of the Event Venue, Retail, and Restaurant buildings. This provides wetland views while providing other outdoor gathering areas and building access while minimizing impacts adjacent to the wetland upland buffer. The residential development will be a pair of duplexes, totaling 4 units, serviced through a shared private driveway with each unit having two levels, 2-car garage, lower-level rear walkout, and upper level deck on the back. Commercial buildings are typical single-story structures, with the exception of the Event Venue that will also have a smaller footprint lower-level basement for storage and data center, complete with a concrete pavement service route under the rear boardwalk. Sidewalks will be provided around the primary sides of the parking, along with a route through the parking lot, connecting the buildings to the parking and to the Meander Road Trail. There is a peninsula area in the southwest corner of the south parcel that at one time had property amenities proposed, but currently has been eliminated and does not have any improvement identified at this time. The Event Venue is looking at implementing a landscape water feature of waterfalls and koi ponds with enhanced landscaping to help complement the aesthetic appeal to the development. See the Site Plan sheets for additional information. Preliminary Plat The property will be subdivided into lots to represent possible sale and ownership of certain aspects of the development. The north area will have four small, attached housing residential lots around the buildings, with a common outlot owned by a Home Owners Association, or similar. Although the residential units are initially intended for rental, the platting is preparing it for sale, if this changes to individual unit ownership. The north parcel will provide typical commercial parcels for the day care, retail, and restaurant buildings and related parking, while the Event Venue will retain ownership of the rest of the site, including the storm basins and wetland areas. You will find additional info, including Drainage and Utility Easements on the Preliminary Plat sheets. Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022 Client Page 3 Access, Traffic, and Parking During concept PUD stage, the commercial driveway access was directed by the city to locate as far west as possible to provide better intersection spacing from the Meander Road / Cavanaugh Drive residential intersection to the east. Also, concept design originally indicated that the residential private driveway was opposite the commercial driveway, but City staff indicated that this should be relocated more to the east to reduce the long driveway and unnecessary improvements, while lessening the conflicts with the new left turn lane. Currently, the private drive is adjacent to the existing resident gravel driveway, just east of the property, but with very low traffic volumes coming from these two driveways, it appears to be an acceptable location. Meander Road, adjacent to the development, was directed to convert from a rural section to a curb and gutter urban section, complete with a parallel city trail extension and related boulevard. The commercial site will require a west bound left turn lane along Meander Road to help reduce traffic congestion, however the east bound traffic projections indicate that a right turn lane into the commercial site is unnecessary, including future development projections from the Tamarack Road study. The left turn lane does not have enough distance to meet MNDOT standards, so a layout to provide the best stacking, taper, and residential driveway access was provided. Shared parking has become more common, and the development is utilizing this trend to provide an appropriate parking lot, without over building it. The commercial buildings provide a compliment of different uses, with different demands to provide a working solution. When events reach a certain size, then off-site parking would most likely be required. The SRF Traffic study provide additional detail on Meander Road traffic data for turn lanes and a shared parking table indicating typical peak and 85% maximum peak ranges for parking demand. Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Grading of the properties generally includes typical commercial and residential standards with buildings and parking draining to inlets that lead to storm basins, that ultimately discharge to the wetlands. Efforts have been made to reduce grading in the wetland upland buffer areas and temporary erosion control has been provided per MPCA NPDES standards. It should be noted that the wetland floodplain elevation of 986.0’ was impacted within the north parcel area, but compensatory volume storage was provided in the south development area. See Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control plans. Stormwater The site primarily captures impervious surface stormwater runoff through storm inlets and underground piping to Stormwater BMPs and is designed to meet the regulations through cistern event center roof reuse water for irrigation, underground storm chambers, and surface basins, Client First and Last Name September 9, 2022 Client Page 4 ultimately discharging to the adjacent wetland. See the Grading and Storm Sewer Plans, along with the SRF Stormwater Report for more information. Utilities Sanitary sewer connection is provided on the north side of Meander Road, by the existing westerly residential lot, east of the gravel driveway, and watermain is basically available along the north side of Meander Road. Both the commercial and residential properties provide city owned main lines for sanitary sewer and watermain throughout the development within Drainage and Utility Easements, to allow the building service connections. Other utilities appear to be in the area, but not illustrated. See Utility Plan and Preliminary Plat sheets for more information. Tree Preservation / Landscape / Irrigation There are many existing significant volunteer trees being removed on site and have indicated that many are exempt from mitigation. Although not clearly defined, additional landscaping is provided for any required tree removal mitigation. Landscape design is basically providing native seed mixes along the wetland edge, sod around the parking and buildings, and a robust combination of trees, shrubs, and perennials in many of the remaining area of the parking and building areas. Irrigation will be design-build and irrigate the sod and planting areas but leave the native seed areas unirrigated. The irrigation system is to utilize the reuse event center roof rain water via a cistern, with supplemental water coming from the existing well on site. See Tree Preservation and Landscape Plan sheets for more information. Wetland Public improvements of Meander Road, city trail, and commercial driveway improvements have developed wetland impact. Currently wetland mitigation is scheduled through cash purchase available through banking credits. It should be noted that the project’s floodplain compensatory storage improvement does disturb the wetland area, but is viewed as a temporary impact, as it is restoring the wetland, and unclear if this would also qualify for on-site wetland mitigation for other areas. See SRF WCA application. Wetland Upland Buffer Average line has been provided on the project, providing the minimum setback, and average. In addition, the buildings have been placed outside of the Wetland Upland Buffer and the additional 15’ Primary Structure setback. The elevated decks and boardwalks are outside of the Wetland Upland Buffer, but within the Primary Structure setback, but indicate the need for flexibility that they are not a primary structure and providing some mitigation items. See SRF Wetland Buffer memo. Planned Unit Development Flexibility Summary Supplement Meander Park and Boardwalk Development 11/04/2022 1. Residential 20% Density Bonus Increase We are requesting flexibility on residential density for the north parcel, as the city can grant an additional 20% residential bonus density. The R-2 PUD guided zoning indicates a density range of 2-3 units per acre, thus we are asking for 3 units per acre, plus 20% bonus density, for new density maximum range of 3.6 units per acre. It is the goal of the project to provide two sets of twin homes totaling four units, on this small parcel of land that involves significant wetlands. It is our understanding that the City of Medina bases the density on land that excludes not only wetland, but also wetland upland buffer. To achieve the four units, the property needs a minimum of 1.2 acres of land per 3.6 units per acre density. The north parcel also needs some flexibility in wetland upland buffers to make the 1.2 acres obtainable, which is further described in the next PUD flexibility item. In summary, the density bonus is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and would benefit this small and challenging parcel with four units planned for the project. Although we respect the City of Medina’s perspective on excluding wetland and wetland upland buffer for density calculation, not every community views this in the same way, and feel that the project’s north parcel is significantly hindered by this interpretation but have proposed a solution with the help of our PUD flexibility request. 2. Residential Minimum Wetland Upland Buffer Zone Width Setback and Area Distribution We are requesting flexibility on minimum wetland upland buffer setbacks for the north parcel residential development area and for redistribution of the wetland upland buffer area from the north parcel to the south parcel. Both requests are tied to the previous flexibility item above to obtain the proper residential density maximum due to the wetland upland buffer land area not included in the unit density calculation. The north wetland is classified as Preserve, which technically requires a 30 foot minimum with 50 foot average, however City staff has indicated that upon further review, the DNR mapped area is over 1,000 feet away and that a 35 foot average would be acceptable. The first request is to provide a minimum of 17 feet for the minimum wetland upland buffer width setback along the residential north parcel development. This is primarily to provide the appropriate wetland upland buffer area to allow the land area for the desired residential density. With the wetland buffer average being reduced, we are requesting some reduction in the buffer width as well. City staff has indicated concern of having the wetland upland buffer too close to the back yards of the residential units, so this reduced buffer width from 30 feet to 17 feet provides a little more space to each unit, and to help prevent future buffer encroachment, a split rail fence is being added at this boundary to control lawn mowing maintenance and impacts, to provide a more permanent marker. Although unclear if needed, we are also asking that the elevated residential decks not be considered a structure and not adhere to the buffer structure setbacks, as it is significantly elevated at the upper level of the residence and would allow rainwater through gaps in the typical decking surface and allow enough sunlight for vegetation to grow below. The second request is for flexibility to redistribute about 10,000 SF of the required north parcel wetland buffer average area to the south parcel. The total required buffer average is still achieved between the two parcels, but to provide the north property residential land area for the density requested, we are moving the designated area to the south property, where there is more room for this item. It is our approach to still provide the spirit of the wetland buffers but are offering a creative solution for flexibility approval to allow integration of other elements into the project, thus the purpose of the Planned Unit Development application. 3. Water Feature Commercial Minimum Upland Buffer Zone Width We are requesting flexibility for minimum upland buffer zone width to build a landscape water feature adjacent to the wetland buffer zone on the southwest corner of the development. This water feature is a critical component of the development as it will provide the necessary visual and audible screening for venue guests at the venue, while mutually creating a beautiful aesthetic for those driving past the venue on Highway 55. The specific location of the water feature was strategically chosen given its close proximity to the conservatory portion of the venue where guests of the venue will be getting married among other ceremonious occasions. The water feature will provide guests inside the conservatory a beautiful backdrop of a waterfall and guests outside the conservatory on the boardwalk, the serene sound of water percolating into a holding pond thus masking the sound of cars driving by at 55 miles per hour. Given the chosen location of the conservatory to be south facing and the limited amount of upland in that area, placing the water feature within the buffer zone is the only practical place to put it. Furthermore, we may choose to inscribe the main highway signage for the venue on the water feature’s southwest outer face. In summary, placing the water feature in this critical area will provide a secluded oasis experience – a grotto per se - for those within the venue and when combined with the conservatory as a backdrop, create a landmark visual in Medina to rival any development along the Highway 55 corridor west of the Twin Cities. Water feature height is expected to be approximately 15’ tall to accommodate for the area’s boardwalk height of 6’ to 9’ tall, screening element for guests inside and outside the venue. It will require a base size of between 30’-40’ to support that height given the splash radius and structural integrity. A portion of the 30’-40’ base width can be tucked underneath the boardwalk where we intend to have a holding pond with koi fish. The overall length of the boardwalk will be approximately 65’. The materials used in the water feature will be a mix of natural boulders, preformed concrete, fountain mechanicals, and additional landscaping such as pockets of plants incorporated throughout to achieve a truly natural aesthetic and feel. The south wetland is classified as Manage 2 and indicates a Minimum Upland Buffer Zone Width of 20 feet and to be in a natural state, via a native seed mix. Technically there is a minimum of 20 feet of area between the delineated wetland boundary and the edge of the elevated boardwalk, however, City staff indicated concern about the landscape water feature not fully defined as an element within the native buffer, so requested that the water feature be located outside of the upland buffer and reduce the minimum buffer zone in this area. To help resolve, we are requesting flexibility to move the buffer setback line to 2’ to allow the necessary area for the landscape water feature. As a supplemental note, the project’s proposed Wetland Average Upland Buffer boundary area exceeds the existing area, as noted in the Wetland Upland Buffer Summary and shown on the Overall Site Plan Sheet. It should also be noted that in the Wetland Buffer Memo, we are also providing some mitigation of the reduced setback by providing removal of non-native species in the upland buffer area and planting native vegetation through a seed mix, adding more desirable trees to the site, and providing interpretive signage that explains the importance of wetlands and upland buffer areas at the commercial boardwalk area. Although unclear if needed, we are also asking that the elevated commercial boardwalk not be considered a structure and not adhere to the buffer structure setbacks, as it is significantly elevated at the upper level of the commercial building and would allow rain water through gaps in the typical decking surface and allow enough sunlight for vegetation to grow below. 4. Parking Lot Landscape Islands We are requesting flexibility on the south parking lot landscape percentage and the layout of landscape islands to break up the parking lot to minimize the expanse. The first request is to receive flexibility to reduce the parking landscape island percentage from 8% to 5%. Due to the significant area of wetlands (an existing landscape feature) on the property, the developable area and parking is limited and has little room to reduce parking to accommodate. It is also noted that there is a pedestrian sidewalk system through the center of the parking lot going north-south, that is not included in the calculation, which would help increase this percentage if counted. To help compensate, the islands are also significantly landscaped with trees and perennial plants to increase the landscape appearance in the parking areas. The second flexibility request is to accept the parking landscape islands as proposed, that are already added from the concept plan to help break up the expanse of the parking lot. The parking lot area is limited and is not that large at 231 spaces compared to the Medina Target that exceeds 500 spaces. There is no desire to add more landscape islands as this limits the flexibility of the parking lot to be used for Event valet stacking of parking and feel that the current layout provides an appropriate level of landscape to break up this limited parking area. 5. Day Care Building Setback We are requesting a 12’ setback from the right-of-way boundary to our proposed daycare building vs the 25’ setback the city code standard. Given the limited buildable space of the site and desire to accommodate the right mix of business uses on the overall vision of Meander Park and Boardwalk, we hope this can be accommodated through our Planned Unit Development. If the daycare building becomes too small, it is less likely to attract a viable daycare provider, which we believe would otherwise positively benefit the growing demand from young families moving into the area. The intent is to angle the building parallel to the parking lot and have a corner of the building reach this 12’ setback (not the entire side of the structure) which opens up more triangle space for the day care play equipment in the play area. 6. Parking Although we believe the 231 parking spaces is sufficient to accommodate the business uses proposed, there may be some occasions where events exceed the 300 or so guests at the venue and have an agreement with Loram Maintenance of Way, located at the southeast quadrant of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive, for additional parking on the weeknights and weekends via a shuttle service that the owner/operator of the venue would provide. Furthermore, given the parking for the proposed daycare will likely only operate during normal daytime business hours Monday-Friday, we intend to utilize those parking spaces via a valet service during weekend events. By using a valet service, we have the ability to “double park” most of the spaces, thus gaining at least an additional 50 parking spaces and potentially more given the wide parking aisle near the north side of the daycare parking area. It should be noted that even though the Event Venue has 300 seats in both the conservatory and ballroom, it typically is used for the same 300-person event, such as the ceremony in one and reception in the other for the same crowd. The SRF Traffic and Parking Study has summarized that almost all 100-person, 200-person, and 300-person (weekends) events can accommodate enough parking on site during an average event, when planned properly with other uses on site. Based on the parking study and plans for off-site parking, via shuttle, it is our request for flexibility in parking space minimum requirements as part of our Planned Unit Development, as the shared parking concept with different demand uses and off-site parking options for larger events, provide the necessary parking for the development. 7. Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape The existing trees on the property are generally considered more of a pioneering tree species that have grown during the life of the previous farmstead, and not considered part of a woodland community or has any special natural interest. City Code indicates that the “control of pioneering Tree species” are exempt from the mitigation requirements, thus we are requesting that the removal of all of these trees are exempt from any tree preservation or replacement requirements as part of the flexibility of our Planned Unit Development. It should be noted that the landscape plan does provide some mitigation of the loss of existing trees by exceeding the minimum requirements for trees and shrubs/perennials to help provide an appropriate and attractive landscape. 8. Residential Units for Lodging The north residential units (villas) are to complement the Event Venue by providing rental lodging for guests, such as a wedding party, family, friends, or general travelers. It is the request of this project, as part of the Planned Unit Development, that flexibility be provided to recognize these units as lodging rental use homes, and not strictly as permanent single family residential homes. The property and units will be setup under one common management, like a Home-Owners-Association (HOA) to take care of the grounds and buildings, such as lawn mowing, snow removal, and maintenance. Conservatory Close Up South Conservatory Close Up South Night Boardwalk Convervatory South View On Boardwalk Looking Southwest Boardwalk NightBoardwalk View Facing East Boardwalk View Coming Down Boardwalk WestLooking Down from Boardwalk Conservatory View Facing Out South View from Highway 55 1 View from Highway 55 2 View from Highway 55 1 Night View from Highway 55 2 Night Southwest Water Feature Design Board Meander Park & Boardwalk DAY CARE 7,500 SF RES UNIT 1 1800 SF RES UNIT 2 1800 SF RES UNIT 3 1800 SF RES UNIT 4 1800 SF RESTAURANT 4,975 SF PLAY A R E A PL A Y A R E A PLAY AREA EVENT VENUE 15,150 SF PLUS 6,996 SF BASEMENT (STORAGE / DATA CENTER) RETAIL 9,600 SF M E A N D E R R O A D PRIVATE DRIVE MBMBMBMB TR E E * 7 8 TR E E * 2 8 TR E E * 2 9 TR E E * 3 3 TR E E * 6 2 TR E E * 6 1 TR E E * 6 0 TR E E * 5 9 TR E E * 5 8 TR E E * 5 7 >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> S W E L L PE D C VL T C C F O PE D C E EO H - E( U G ) E( U G ) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH) F/O(UG) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > >> >> G G F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) S S S N PRELIMINARY PLAT PP1.0 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Electrical Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. I hereby certify that this plan, survey, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 B. RUTMAN B. RUTMAN P. SCHROEDER 15295 N. SCHAUFENBUEL N. SCHAUFENBUEL M. AARON J. FILLMORE J. FILLMORE P. SCHROEDER L. BREU L. BREU E. HUNKER XXXXX 56607257212582054289 BRADY P. RUTMANMICHAEL C. AARONPAUL D. SCHROEDERLISA A. BREU 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com PRELIMINARY PLAT LEGEND PROPERTY LINE - PROPOSED LOT LINE EXISTING INTERNAL LOT LINES EXISTING EASEMENT PROPOSED EASEMENT SETBACK LINE (VARIABLE, NOT SHOWN) EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT AREA LOT 1 BLOCK 1 LOT 2 BLOCK 1 LOT 3 BLOCK 1 LOT 4 BLOCK 1 OUTLOT ROW DEDICATION TOTAL 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 420,244 SF 3,908 SF 442,152 SF 0.103 ACRES 0.103 ACRES 0.103 ACRES 0.103 ACRES 9.648 ACRES 0.090 ACRES 10.150 ACRES THE FOLLOWING LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AS SHOWN ON LOT SURVEY PRODUCED BY SKYSURV, DATED NOVEMBER 17, 2021. Parcel 1: The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, excepting therefrom the East 196.73 feet thereof; and the North 457.63 feet thereof. Parcel 2: The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23 except that part thereof lying South of the North 457.63 fee of said Southwest Quarter and lying West of the East 196.73 feet of said Southwest Quarter and Except the East 60 feet thereof. Parcel 3: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 118, Range 23, lying North of the railroad right-of-way, excepting therefrom the East 60 feet thereof, in Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXISTING PROPERTY AREA = 802,799 SF (18.429 ACRES), PER SURVEY BOUNDARY. ·NORTH PARCEL = 442,152 SF (10.150 ACRES). ·SOUTH PARCEL = 360,647 SF (8.279 ACRES). EXISTING PROPERTY - LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1.EXISTING PROPERTY IS BASED ON LOT SURVEY COMPLETED BY SKYSURV, DATED NOVEMBER 17, 2021, WHICH ALSO REFERENCES CERTAIN ITEMS, LIKE WETLAND DELINEATION, PROVIDED BY AREA M SHAPE FILE. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY DATA PROVIDED BY SRF CONSULTING, SUMMER OF 2022. 2.PROJECT BEARINGS ARE BASED ON HORIZONTAL DATUM NEAD83(2011) AND VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. 3.SRF PROJECT BENCHMARK IS LOCATED AT: SW CORNER OF SECTION 2, T118N, R23W, N: 194782.799, E: 453467.220, ELEVATION 995.550. 4.EXISTING ZONING - RURAL RESIDENTIAL URBAN RESERVE (RR-UR) = NORTH PARCEL, COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY (CH) = SOUTH PARCEL. 5.PROPOSED ZONING - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) = NORTH PARCEL, AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) = SOUTH PARCEL. 6.BUILDING SETBACK LINES = VARIABLE (PUD). 7.EASEMENTS AS DESCRIBED AND ILLUSTRATED ON PLAN, AS APPLICABLE. 8.PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION IS RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED HOUSING FOR THE NORTH PARCEL, AND COMMERCIAL RETAIL FOR THE SOUTH PARCEL. FIRST FLOOR ELEVATIONS, SEE DEVELOPMENT GRADING PLAN. 9.SEE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL PROJECT INFO. 10.SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT DETAILS. PLATTING NOTES PROPOSED PLAT NAME: MEANDER PROPOSED PARCEL INFO: PROPOSED PROPERTY MEANDER - PLAT SUMMARY - NORTH LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA ACRES HIG H W A Y 5 5 M E A N D E R R O A D LOT 1 BLOCK 2 LOT 2 BLOCK 2 LOT 3 BLOCK 2 LOT 4 BLOCK 2 ROW DEDICATION TOTAL 264,637 SF 29,585 SF 34,123 SF 29,351 SF 2,678 SF 360,374 SF 6.075 ACRES 0.679 ACRES 0.783 ACRES 0.674 ACRES 0.062 ACRES 8.273 ACRES MEANDER - PLAT SUMMARY - SOUTH LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA ACRES BLOCK 2 BLOCK 1 OUTLOT LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4 LOT 1 LOT 2LOT 3 LOT 4 N00°16'12"E 511.86 S00°10'09"E 493.22 S6 9 ° 5 9 ' 3 2 " E 6 4 9 . 6 7 N8 7 ° 2 1 ' 2 4 " W 5 9 4 . 2 9 S8 7 ° 2 1 ' 2 4 " E 5 9 7 . 1 4 21.15 D=26°22'44" R=45.93 CB=N56°28'32"W C=20.96 17.34 D=21°37'55" R=45.93 CB=N59°23'20"E C=17.24 N00°16'12"E 730.28 S00°10'09"W 705.38 S8 9 ° 2 5 ' 3 5 " W 6 1 2 . 7 3 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 90 . 0 0 90 . 0 0 90 . 0 0 90 . 0 0 37 . 3 7 22 0 . 1 5 98.60 13 3 . 3 0 137.51242.08 15 7 . 1 6 99.99 83.67 62.0031.00 27 . 0 0 7.8 6 62.00 52 . 0 0 51 . 6 3 20 1 . 8 6 83.67 27 . 0 0 62.00 31.00 45 . 0 0 95 . 0 0 121.05 31 1 . 7 4 PROPOSED 28' WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED PERIMETER 10' WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) PROPOSED PERIMETER 10' WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) PROPOSED 29'± WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTPROPOSED 53'± WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED 30' WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED 35' WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED 20' WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT N00°06'04"W 164.66 ROW DEDICATION 6.50 X 605.93 MINIMUM 12' FROM BACK OF CURB WITH ADDITIONAL 10' TRAIL EASEMENT ROW DEDICATION 6.00 X 311.74 MINIMUM 22' FROM BACK OF CURB ROW DEDICATION 64.12 X 17.34 X 6.27 X 83.18 X 5.41 275' FUTURE RIGHT-TURN LANE AND TAPER 20' FROM BACK OF FUTURE CURB FUTURE RIGHT-TURN LANE BACK OF CURB 6.6 1 60 5 . 9 3 84 . 8 7 6.00 5.41 83 . 1 8 126.0043.62 1 12-22-2022 REVISION GROUND 0' - 0" LEVEL 2 24' - 6" BASEMENT -9' - 0" ROOF 36' - 6" LEVEL 1 13' - 0" GROUND 0' - 0" LEVEL 2 24' - 6" ROOF 36' - 6" LEVEL 1 13' - 0" GROUND 0' - 0" LEVEL 2 24' - 6" ROOF 36' - 6" LEVEL 1 13' - 0" GROUND 0' - 0" LEVEL 2 24' - 6" BASEMENT -9' - 0" ROOF 36' - 6" LEVEL 1 13' - 0" \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A200 VE N U E E L E V A T I O N S 12 / 2 2 / 2 2 Me d i n a P U D - C o n c e p t WEST SOUTH EAST NORTH No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e MAIN LEVEL 10' - 0" UPPER LEVEL 21' - 6" ROOF 31' - 6" BASEMENT 0' - 0" MAIN LEVEL 10' - 0" UPPER LEVEL 21' - 6" ROOF 31' - 6" \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/4" 1'-0" A202 DU P L E X E L E V A T I O N S 12 / 2 2 / 2 2 ME D I N A T O W N H O M E S No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e EAST WEST 14 ' - 0 " 1' - 0 " 17 ' - 0 " 1' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 0 " 1' - 0 " 17 ' - 0 " \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A201 RE T A I L E L E V A T I O N S 09 / 0 9 / 2 2 Me d i n a P U D - C o n c e p t RETAIL SOUTH RETAIL NORTH DAYCARE SOUTH DAYCARE EAST No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e (NORTH IS SAME BUT MIRRORED) \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: A300 PE R S P E C T I V E R E N D E R I N G S 12 / 2 2 / 2 2 Me d i n a P U D - C o n c e p t RETAIL BOARDWALK PARKING RETAIL CROSSWALK MAIN ENTRY No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: A301 PE R S P E C T I V E R E N D E R I N G S 12 / 2 2 / 2 2 Me d i n a P U D - C o n c e p t CONSERVATORY MAIN ENTRY GROTTOBALLROOM PLAZA BALLROOM LOUNGE PLAZA No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: A302 PE R S P E C T I V E R E N D E R I N G S 12 / 2 2 / 2 2 Me d i n a P U D - C o n c e p t FRONT OF DUPLEX REAR OF DUPLEX No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e UP BASEMENT GARBAGE ELEVATOR LOADING DOCK EARTH EARTH \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A100 VE N U E B A S E M E N T F L O O R P L A N 12 / 2 2 / 2 2 Me d i n a P U D - C o n c e p t 1/8" 1'-0"1 VENUE BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e BASEMENT ROOM SCHEDULE Name Area BASEMENT 6,692 SF ELEVATOR 120 SF 6,812 SF NOTE: REFER TO CIVIL FOR SITE PLAN. DN UP CONSERVATORY BALLROOM SUITE LOUNGE SUITE RETAIL TRASH OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW PLAZA BOARDWALK LOUNGE PLAZA GROTTO BOARDWALK MAIN ENTRY PLAZA DROP OFF COURTYARD MENS ELEVATOR WOMENS MENS WOMENS KITCHEN HALL COATS ELEV LOBBY HALL RECEPTION ENTRY STAIR STAIR ENTRY RECEPTION HALL COATS \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A101 VE N U E M A I N L E V E L F L O O R P L A N 12 / 2 2 / 2 2 Me d i n a P U D - C o n c e p t 1/8" 1'-0"1 VENUE MAIN LEVEL PLAN No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e MAIN LEVEL ROOM SCHEDULE Name Area BALLROOM 4,635 SF CONSERVATORY 3,383 SF KITCHEN 1,122 SF LOUNGE 1,033 SF HALL 516 SF SUITE 344 SF ENTRY 340 SF SUITE 317 SF HALL 300 SF ENTRY 264 SF MENS 243 SF WOMENS 243 SF ELEV LOBBY 230 SF STAIR 197 SF STAIR 196 SF MENS 168 SF COATS 164 SF WOMENS 155 SF COATS 122 SF ELEVATOR 120 SF RECEPTION 118 SF HALL 115 SF RECEPTION 91 SF 14,417 SF NOTE: REFER TO CIVIL FOR SITE PLAN. DN UP DN UP DN DNDN ROOM 4 ROOM 8 ROOM 9 ROOM 3 ROOM 2 ROOM 1 ROOM 5 ROOM 7 ROOM 6 HALLWAY STAIR ELEVATOR STAIR SUITE 1 SUITE 2 ROOM 4 ELEVATOR HALL ROOM 3 STAIR STAIR ROOM 5 ROOF BALCONY BALCONY \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A102 LO D G I N G L E V E L 1 & 2 F L O O R P L A N S 12 / 2 2 / 2 2 Me d i n a P U D - C o n c e p t No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e 1/8" 1'-0"1 LODGING LEVEL 1 1/8" 1'-0"2 LODING LEVEL2 LEVEL 1 ROOM SCHEDULE Name Area ELEVATOR 120 SF HALLWAY 427 SF ROOM 1 427 SF ROOM 2 479 SF ROOM 3 497 SF ROOM 4 497 SF ROOM 5 785 SF ROOM 6 626 SF ROOM 7 349 SF ROOM 8 336 SF ROOM 9 753 SF STAIR 195 SF STAIR 197 SF 5,687 SF LEVEL 2 ROOM SCHEDULE Name Area SUITE 1 917 SF SUITE 2 947 SF ROOM 3 581 SF ROOM 4 304 SF ROOM 5 353 SF HALL 426 SF ELEVATOR 120 SF STAIR 197 SF STAIR 194 SF 4,038 SF RETAIL 3,380 SF RETAIL 2,870 SF RETAIL 4,760 SF RESTAURANT TRASH TRASH PLAZA DROP OFF RETAIL \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A103 CO M M E R C I A L F L O O R P L A N S 09 / 0 9 / 2 2 Me d i n a P U D - C o n c e p t 1/8" 1'-0"1 RETAIL FLOOR PLAN No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e NOTE: REFER TO CIVIL FOR SITE PLAN. DN DN UP UP DN UP UP GARAGE KITCHEN BED BATH BED ENTRYDININGHALL DECK CLOSET HALLWAY ROOF TERRACE DECK BELOW MASTER BATH BATH BED CLOSET CLOSET BED LIVING CLOSET BATH PATIO EARTH \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/4" 1'-0" A104 DU P L E X F L O O R P L A N S 12 / 2 2 / 2 2 ME D I N A T O W N H O M E S 1/4" 1'-0"2 MAIN LEVEL 1/4" 1'-0"3 UPPER LEVEL 1/4" 1'-0"1 BASEMENT BASEMENT CLOSET 50 SF BASEMENT BATH 52 SF BASEMENT BED 143 SF BASEMENT LIVING 527 SF 772 SF MAIN LEVEL CLOSET 38 SF MAIN LEVEL HALL 66 SF MAIN LEVEL BATH 78 SF MAIN LEVEL ENTRY 94 SF MAIN LEVEL KITCHEN 124 SF MAIN LEVEL BED 153 SF MAIN LEVEL BED 244 SF MAIN LEVEL DINING 358 SF 1,156 SF ROOM SCHEDULE Level Name Area UPPER LEVEL CLOSET 42 SF UPPER LEVEL BATH 69 SF UPPER LEVEL HALLWAY 74 SF UPPER LEVEL CLOSET 88 SF UPPER LEVEL BATH 149 SF UPPER LEVEL BED 242 SF UPPER LEVEL MASTER 348 SF 1,013 SF No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e Ordinance No. ### 1 DATE CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. ### AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR “MEANDER PARK AND BOARDWALK” AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP THE CITY COUNCIL OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Medina received a request to change the zoning classification of the property legally described in Exhibit A (the “Property”) to Planned Unit Development. Based on the written and oral record before the Planning Commission and City Council during review of the request as well as all additional testimony submitted to the City, the City Council has found that the proposed rezoning of the Property to Planned Unit Development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and serves the purpose of the Planned Unit Development district. Section 2. The Property is hereby rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The location of the zoning amendment is depicted on the map in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Section 3. The Meander Park and Boardwalk Planned Unit Development General Plan is hereby approved. A. All entitlements, including but not limited to, allowed uses, density, dimensional standards, setbacks and development standards established within this PUD District are hereby set forth by the Meander Park and Boardwalk General Plan dated ______, (the “General Plan”) which are incorporated herein by reference, except as may be expressly modified by this ordinance or Resolution 2023-##. B. Unless specifically addressed by this ordinance, the Property shall be subject to the requirements set forth by the City of Medina Zoning Ordinance, including the Two- Family Residential (“R2”) zoning district north of Meander Road, the Commercial- Highway (“CH”) zoning district south of Meander Road, as well as other relevant standards which are not district-specific. C. The lots within the Property south of Meander Road shall be classified as “Commercial Lots” and the lots within the Property north of Meander Road shall be classified as “Twinhome Lots” as described in Exhibit B. The Commercial Lots and Twinhome Lots shall be subject to the relevant standards described herein. Section 4. Allowed Uses. The allowed uses within the PUD District shall be as follows: A. Commercial Lots. i. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses shall be those described in the General Plan. Other permitted uses described in the CH zoning district shall be allowed upon the Commercial Lots, subject to administrative review by City staff for Ordinance No. ### 2 DATE compliance with relevant standards, including but not limited to parking requirements. ii. Conditional Uses. The following shall be permitted within the Commercial Lots, subject to separate conditional use permit approval, the specific requirements established in Section 838.5.08, and other applicant provisions of the city code: a. Indoor Recreational Uses, including but not limited to bowling alleys, dance halls, movie theaters, and live entertainment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Event Venue and Conservatory as described within the General Plan shall be considered permitted uses and shall not require separate conditional use permit approval b. Retail and service uses which include the keeping of animals on-site. iii. Accessory Uses. Allowed accessory uses shall be those described in the CH district, except Outdoor Storage shall not be permitted. B. Twinhome Lots. The permitted, conditional, and accessory uses shall be those described in the R2 zoning district, except that Accessory Dwelling Units shall not be permitted. Dwellings, or any portion thereof, shall not be used for short-term rentals. For the purpose of this ordinance, the term short-term rental means the rental of a dwelling or portion thereof for less than 30 consecutive days. Section 5. Lot Standards. A. The layout of the Commercial Lots and the structures and improvements thereon shall be substantially consistent with the General Plan. Minor deviations may be approved by City staff provided the square footage of the structures does not exceed that shown on the General Plan and the setbacks of the structures and parking lot do not decrease from that shown. B. The Twinhome Lots shall be subject to the requirements of the R2 zoning district except as explicitly described below. i. Minimum lot size: 4,500 square feet ii. Minimum front yard setback: 5 feet from front lot line iii. Minimum side yard setback: 6 feet, except the side yard setback shall be reduced to zero for the common wall between two dwelling units. iv. Maximum impervious surface coverage: 62% Section 6. Design and Development Standards. All standards not specified by this ordinance are to be the same as found in the Medina Zoning Ordinance for the relevant underlying zoning districts specified herein. The following deviations from the underlying performance standards are hereby in effect for the Meander Park and Boardwalk Planned Unit Development: A. Building Materials and Design shall be consistent with the standards approved by the City Council at the time of final plat review, which shall be subject to review for consistency with enhancements required in Resolution 2023-##. Ordinance No. ### 3 DATE B. Landscaping and tree replacement shall be consistent with the landscaping plan approved by the City Council at the time of final plat review, which shall be subject to review for consistency with enhancements required in Resolution 2023- ##. C. The location of Upland Buffers shall be as depicted on the General Plan. Fencing shall be provided along the edge of the Upland Buffer adjacent to the Twinhome Lots. Vegetation and signage shall meet relevant ordinance standards. D. Signage shall abide by the requirements of the City Sign Ordinance except as expressly described below. Signage on the Commercial Lots shall meet the requirements described for the Commercial-Highway district except as follows: i. A maximum of one freestanding sign shall be permitted adjacent to the Highway 55 frontage on the Property. This sign shall be subject to the requirements for freestanding signs in the CH district. ii. One monument sign shall be permitted adjacent to the shared access of the Commercial Lots adjacent to Meander Road. No pylon sign shall be permitted along the frontage of Meander Road. The monument sight shall meet the requirements for monument signs in the CH district. iii. Any wall sign on the north or east elevation of the building on Lot 2, Block 2 shall not be internally illuminated. iv. No wall sign shall be permitted above the first story of the north elevation of the building on Lot 1, Block 2. v. No wall sign shall be permitted above the second story of the east elevation of the building on Lot 1, Block 2. vi. Projecting signs shall be permitted, provided adequate clearance is provided and that the area of such signs is included within the allowed area of wall signage for the building in question. E. The owner(s) of the Commercial Lots shall implement active parking management practices consistent with a plan approved by the City Council at the time of final plat review. Off-site parking and shuttling shall be implemented as necessary for larger events within the Event Venue and Conservatory. If the City determines, in its sole discretion, that such active parking management is inadequate, the owner(s) shall implement additional practices to the satisfaction of City staff or limit attendance at events as necessary based on parking supply. Such determination by the City will be communicated to the owner(s) in writing, and thereafter the owner(s) will be provided 60 days to adequately address the inadequacies to the City’s satisfaction. Section 7. The City of Medina Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to place this ordinance into effect and to make the appropriate changes to the official zoning map of the City of Medina to reflect the change in zoning classifications as set forth above only upon recording of the Meander Park and Boardwalk plat. Ordinance No. ### 4 DATE Section 8. A copy of this ordinance and the updated map shall be kept on file at the Medina City Hall. Section 9. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, publication, and recording of the Meander Park and Boardwalk plat. Adopted by the Medina City Council this ____ day of ______, 2023. CITY OF MEDINA By: Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: By: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk Published in the Crow River News on this day the ____ of __________, 2023. Ordinance No. ### 5 DATE EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property Ordinance No. ### 6 DATE EXHIBIT B Map Depicting “Commercial” and “Twinhome” Lots Resolution No. 2023-## January 17, 2023 Member ________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-## RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. ### BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance establishing a planned unit development district for “Meander Park and Boardwalk” and amending the official zoning map; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statues § 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publications by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and WHEREAS, the ordinance is six pages in length and contains a map; and WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina that the city clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. ### to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the ordinance in its entirety: Public Notice The city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ##, an ordinance establishing a planned unit development district for “Meander Park and Boardwalk.” The ordinance rezones property located at 1472 Highway 55, which is proposed to be subdivided and developed as to planned unit development. The development includes four residential lots north of Meander Road and four commercial lots south of Meander Road. The ordinance establishes regulations related land use of the property and standards for the design and construction of the development. The full text of the ordinance is available from the city clerk at Medina city hall during regular business hours. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina that the city clerk keep a copy of the ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that she post a full copy of the ordinance in a public place within the city. Resolution No. 2023-## 2 DATE Dated: January 17, 2023. ______________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ________ upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2023-## February 7, 2023 Member _________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-## A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING CORRIDORS OF COMMERCE FUNDING REQUEST TO RESURFACE HIGHWAY 55 FROM CR 118 TO CR 19, WITH TWO-LANE TO FOUR-LANE EXPANSION WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has approved $200 million or more in Trunk Highway bond funds for the 2022-2023 Corridors of Commerce program (COC); and WHEREAS, resurfacing Trunk Highway (TH) 55 from County Road (CR) 118 TO CR 19, with two-lane to four-lane expansion is eligible for funding in the fiscal year 2022 COC program; and WHEREAS, the Highway 55 Corridor Coalition, in partnership with coalition membership, is requesting $43 million in funding for reconstruction of TH 55 from a two-lane undivided to a four-lane divided roadway and access consolidation in Hennepin County from Arrowhead Drive in the City of Medina to CR 19 north of Loretto; and WHEREAS, TH 55 provides for safe and efficient movement of goods, services, and people between Hennepin and Wright counties as well as communities and industries across northwestern Minnesota.; and WHEREAS, the City of Medina confirms its support for the Highway 55 Corridor Coalition’s request for $43 million in 2022 Corridors of Commerce program funding to resurface TH 55 from CR 118 to CR 19 with expansion from a two to a four-lane highway; and THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Medina does hereby support a Highway 55 Corridor Coalition funding request through the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s 2022-2023 Corridors of Commerce program for construction, right-of-way, and engineering services necessary to resurface TH 55 from CR 118 to CR 19 with two-lane to four-lane expansion. Resolution No. 2023-## 2 February 7, 2023 Dated: February 7, 2023. By: ______________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: By: ___________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jim Stremel, City Engineer DATE: January 11, 2023 MEETING: January 17, 2023 SUBJECT: 2023 Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Receive Feasibility & Order Plans/Specifications Background: On December 6, 2022 the City Council adopted a resolution authorizing the preparation of an engineering feasibility report for the proposed Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project. The project was initiated as a part of the City’s capital improvement planning and is intended to replace deteriorating infrastructure that includes the existing roadway surface. The proposed project consists of a pavement mill/overlay of the pavement surface along Clydesdale Trail from roughly 100 feet east of the City’s public works driveway to the intersection at County Road 101. There are also sections of the existing concrete curb, spot bituminous trail repairs, the replacement of a section of bituminous trail along CR 101, and pedestrian curb ramps that would be replaced with the project. The total estimated project cost is $518,000 which includes a 10% contingency factor and 20% indirect costs for legal, engineering, administrative, and financing. The project is proposed to be funded through special assessments to the benefiting properties and City street funds. Unlike a lot of the projects the City assesses for, the parcels differ in size and land use type throughout the project area. With this in mind, City staff has obtained a proposal from an appraiser to complete a benefit appraisal. The next step is for the City Council to consider the enclosed resolution to receive the feasibility report and order the plans and specifications. City staff is recommending that the City also consider approval of the benefit appraisal for the project.. Depending on the date of completion of the benefit appraisal, staff will bring forth a request to set the date of the improvement hearing. City Council Action Requested: Consider a motion to adopt the resolution receiving the feasibility report, order the preparation of plans and specifications, approve WSB’s proposal for final design and direct staff to contract with an appraiser to complete a benefit appraisal at their discretion. Agenda Item # 8C BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. 2100 MINNEAPOLIS AVENUE, MINNEAPOLIS , MN 55 406 651.646.6114 www.brkw.com December 2 3 , 202 2 Jim Stremel , PE Sr. Project Manager WSB 701 Xenia Avenue S ., Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 R e : Proposal f or Appraisal Services – S pecial Benefits Valuation City of Medina, MN – Clydesdale Trail Mill & Overlay Dear M r . Stremel : By way of this letter, I am submitting a proposal for BRKW Appraisals, Inc. to provide WSB, on behalf of its client, the City of Medina , Minnesota with a special benefits appraisal pertaining to the above referenced proposed improvement project , which includes mill and overlay repaving of Clydesdale Trail from County Road 101 westward , southward and northward to a point about 975 feet east of County Road 116 .I have reviewed a project location exhibit map you provid ed which identifies the section of this road to be rehabilitated and also shows the properties abutting this road section. It is my understanding that the City intends to levy special assessments against properties which abut Clydesdale Trail and receive special benefits from its rehabilitation. Purpose/Intended Use/Intended Users The purpose of the appraisal is to provide an opinion of the increase in market value, if any, accruing to several subject properties in the project area as a result of the pro posed street rehabilitation project. The inten ded use of the appraisal is to assist the C ity Council and staff in levying special assessments to benefiting properties in an equitable manner, pertaining to the street improvements . The intended users are W SB , which would be the client of the appraisal assignment, and officials of the City of Medina , which is a client of WSB. Subject Properties I have prepared two alternative lists of properties, shown on the next two pages, which are recommended to be app raised for special benefits purposes, as follows: Option 1 (total of 1 6 subject properties): I ncludes all properties which , based on my preliminary research thus far, front Clydesdale Trail in the project area and have the potential to receive at least some level of special benefit from the project. Option 2 (total of 9 subject properties): I ncludes the 8 least homogeneous properties identified in the Option 1 list wh ich likely will have significantly varying special benefit conclusions on both a total dollars and per -square -foot -of -land basis; plus one typical/average property intended to reasonably represent the approximate special benefit, on a per -square -foot -of -la nd basis, to a subset of 8 smaller , comparatively homogeneous commercial properties, all of which are contained within the Option 1 list. Agenda Item #8C BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 2 Property No./Fee Owner PID #Address Land Area (Ac.)*Zoning Comments 1. Midwestern Properties, LLC 12-118-23-24-0023 550 Clydesdale Tr.3.28 IP Indust. Pk. 2. Cheryl Dykhoff 12-118-23-23-0058 ---0.74 CH Cmcl.-Hwy. 3. Thomas Dykhoff 12-118-23-24-0011 552 State Hwy. 55 1.01 CH Cmcl.-Hwy. 4. Cheryl Dykhoff 12-118-23-24-0022 ---0.80 CH Cmcl.-Hwy. 5. Medina Leased Hsg Ascts I LP 12-118-23-24-0031 501 Clydesdale Cir.3.85 MU Mixed Use 6. Medina Recreations, Inc.12-118-23-24-0030 500 State Hwy. 55 5.06 PUD 12-118-23-24-0024 " " "2.04 Planned Unit Total Property 7.10 Development 7. Medina Motor Inn 12-118-23-24-0025 400 State Hwy. 55 1.75 PUD 8. Clydesdale Market, LLC 12-118-23-13-0035 340 Clydesdale Tr.0.75 PUD 9. Wells Fargo Bank, NA 12-118-23-13-0043 330 Clydesdale Tr.0.74 PUD 10. P.J. Norman, LLC 12-118-23-13-0036 345 Clydesdale Tr.1.23 PUD 11. Clydesdale Market, LLC 12-118-23-13-0037 325 Clydesdale Tr.1.18 PUD 12. Clydesdale Market, LLC 12-118-23-13-0044 302 Clydesdale Tr.3.04 PUD 13. Target Corp.12-118-23-13-0042 300 Clydesdale Tr.10.70 PUD 14. Valvoline, LLC 12-118-23-13-0041 215 Clydesdale Tr.0.97 CH Cmcl.-Hwy. 15. Holiday Stationstores, Inc.12-118-23-14-0023 200 State Hwy. 55 2.12 CH Cmcl.-Hwy. 16. SOR Real Estate, LLC 12-118-23-14-0156 212 Clydesdale Tr.1.27 PUD City of Medina, MN - Clydesdale Trail Mill & Overlay Special Benefits Appraisal Proposal - BRKW Appraisals, Inc. Properties to be Appraised - OPTION 1 Medina Entertainment Center with bar, restaurant, bowling, event/party rooms plus large ballroom. Vacant commercial lot at western edge of Target-anchored retail ctr. Wells Fargo Bank branch adjoining Target-anchored retail ctr. Goddard School early childhood learning center near Target *Land area is according to Hennepin County records and excludes existing public road right of way, if any Office warehouse property. Part of site contains wetland. Long, narrow vacant parcel; likely not developable on its own. Long, narrow parcel containing single-family home, small out- buildings; accessed from Hwy. 55. Highly irregular shaped vacant parcel fronting Clydesdale Tr. and Hwy. 55; no access in place from either road. 26-unit affordable townhome development 2-story motel. Land area includes shared access road serving motel and Entertainment Center to west. Total Number of Properties to be Appraised: 16 Small multi-tenant retail/service building near Target Inline retail strip center portion of Target-anchored retail center Target retail store Valvoline Instant Oil Change shop Holiday gas station/convenience store and liquor store Small multi-tenant retail/service building near Target BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 3 The advantage of the Option 1 list is that it provides an opinion for all properties in the project area fronting the street section to be improved and likely to receive some benefit from the mill and overlay project. Unlike sing le -family residential properties, which tend to be more homogeneous in their land values and the special benefits the y receive from a road project, commercial/industrial properties like those in this project area tend to vary more significantly in value, on a total dollars basis as well as on a per -square -foot -of -land basis , since their values fluctuate more significantly with differences in size, shape, location/visibility and zoning. Consequently, such properties also tend to exhibit a wider range of special benefits, on a total dollars and per -square -foot -of -land basis, relatively residential properties. The advantage of the Option 2 list is there is a cost savings associated with fewer properties being appraised, with one property representing itself and also being a reasonabl e proxy for representing the approximate per -square -foot benefit of seven other fairly similar properties. The tradeoff with Option 2 is there is less precision in terms of having an individual benefit conclusion for every benefiting property. Property No./Fee Owner PID #Address Land Area (Ac.)*Zoning Comments 1. Midwestern Properties, LLC 12-118-23-24-0023 550 Clydesdale Tr.3.28 IP Indust. Pk. 2. Cheryl Dykhoff 12-118-23-23-0058 ---0.74 CH Cmcl.-Hwy. 3. Thomas Dykhoff 12-118-23-24-0011 552 State Hwy. 55 1.01 CH Cmcl.-Hwy. 4. Cheryl Dykhoff 12-118-23-24-0022 ---0.80 CH Cmcl.-Hwy. 5. Medina Leased Hsg Ascts I LP 12-118-23-24-0031 501 Clydesdale Cir.3.85 MU Mixed Use 6. Medina Recreations, Inc.12-118-23-24-0030 500 State Hwy. 55 5.06 PUD 12-118-23-24-0024 " " "2.04 Planned Unit Total Property 7.10 Development 12. Clydesdale Market, LLC 12-118-23-13-0044 302 Clydesdale Tr.3.04 PUD 13. Target Corp.12-118-23-13-0042 300 Clydesdale Tr.10.70 PUD X. Typical Small Commercial To Be Determined TBD TBD PUD or Property - Owner TBD CH *Land area is according to Hennepin County records and excludes existing public road right of way, if any Office warehouse property. Part of site contains wetland. Long, narrow vacant parcel; likely not developable on its own. Long, narrow parcel containing single-family home, small out- buildings; accessed from Hwy. 55. Highly irregular shaped vacant parcel fronting Clydesdale Tr. and Hwy. 55; no access in place from either road. 26-unit affordable townhome development Typical/average small commercial property - one to be selected from and reasonably representative of those in group containing properties 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15 or 16 from Option 1 property list City of Medina, MN - Clydesdale Trail Mill & Overlay Special Benefits Appraisal Proposal - BRKW Appraisals, Inc. Properties to be Appraised - OPTION 2 Medina Entertainment Center with bar, restaurant, bowling, event/party rooms plus large ballroom. Total Number of Properties to be Appraised: 9 Inline retail strip center portion of Target-anchored retail center Target retail store BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 4 Scope of W ork Val u ation Methodology : The special benefits appraisal will be based on a before -and - after valuation methodology. This involves developing an opinion of each property market value as it exists before the proposed project improvements, and also conclu ding an opinion of the market value of the property assuming the improvements are completed. The difference between the before and after values reflects an opinion of special benefit to the property resulting from the street improvement project. Most o f the subject properties to be appraised contain buildings and supporting site improvements. However, since the value benefits of street, utility and similar public improvement projects accrue to the land, rather than to the building improvements, in all cases the valuation will involve the land component of the properties only . Th e value contribution of the building and supporting site improvements located upon the land does not change as a result of the street project. Consequently, it is not necessary to include the buildings and site improvements on the land in the valuation. The Sales Comparison Approach will be applied in valuing the land component of the subject properties in the before -project and after -project situations. In the Sales Comparison approach, the subject property land is compared to other reasonably similar l and parcels which have recently sold. Adjustments to the comparable land sale prices are made for value -related differences between the subject and the comparables, the result of which is a range of indications of what the subject land would sell for if o ffered on the open market. The range of values is reconciled into a final single -point estimate of the subject property land value, before and after the project. Multiple Tax Parcel Properties : As shown in the Option 1 and Option 2 property lists on the preceding pages, one of the subject properties recommended to be appraised under both options comprise s two adjoining tax parcels under common ownership and use. To conform with proper appraisal methodology, especially as it pertains to the analysis a nd conclusion of highest and best use, the appraiser must consider the “Larger Parcel,” where applicable, and not limit the analysis to just one tax parcel, unless there is a separate and distinct highest and best use for the one tax parcel relative to an adjoining, commonly -owned parcel (or parcel s). This requirement holds true even if the City does not intend to assess all of the tax parcels in a multiple -parcel property due to their lack of direct frontage on the street to be improved. The three criter ia defining the Larger Parcel are groups of parcels which have 1) unity of ownership or control, 2) unity of location (typically, contiguity), and 3) unity of use (i.e., the parcels have the same current use or have the same highest and best use). The sub ject properties, as shown in the Option 1 and Option 2 lists , are identified and grouped into larger parcels, where applicable, based on these criteria. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 5 Discussed below is the one subject property situation in which a Larger Parcel analysis was required and conclusions have been made , relative to which parcels should constitute the propert y to be appraised for special benefits purposes: • Property 6 comprises the Medina Entertainment Center complex with a main 5.06 -acre south tax parcel containing the multi -use building and a large paved parking lot, together with an adjoining 2 .04 north tax parcel which contains a gravel -surfaced parking lot that apparently provides overflow parking for the main parcel. Given the size of the building, it appears both land parce ls at times are needed to support activities within the entertainment center building, and therefore it is unlikely the north parcel would be sold and developed on its own. The two commonly owned, adjoining parcels clearly function as one property supporting the existing entertainment center use, meeting the larger parcel criteria, and thus they would be appraised as one property for special benefits purposes. A ny special benefit concluded for the overall pr operty would be allocated between its two tax parcels on a pro -rata basis, relative to their share of the total land area of the overall property. Effective Date of Valuation : The effective date of opinions of special benefits contained in the appraisal will be the date on which the subject properties and project area are viewed by the appraiser. This date will be some time in January or February of 202 3 . Report Type The results of the appraisal of the subject properties will be communicated in one ap praisal report . The appraisal will be presented in a Restricted Appraisal Report format, which meets the minimum requirements of content that must be contained in an appraisal report as mandated by the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). In a Restricted Appraisal Report format, the focus is on stating the main points and conclusi o ns of the appraisal process , rather than discussing in detail the properties and illustrating the valuation methodology used in arriving at the appraiser’s value opinions. The appraisal process and its results are presented in a very brief manner, with significant supporting data, notes and anal yses retained in the office work file of the appraiser. The primary function of the Restricted Appraisal Report connected to this valuation assignment is to communicate to the client whether proposed or contemplated property assessments in accordance with the City special assessment policy can be sustained by a t least an equal increase in the market value of the property as a result of the proposed improvement project ; the primary function of th e report is not to document and prove within the report how the appraiser’s conclusion of any market value increase was reached. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 6 The Restricted Appraisal Report will contain, for each subject property, an opinion of the special benefit, if any , resulting from the proposed street improvement project . The report will provide commentary on the various factors and circumsta nces influencing the final conclusions of benefit to the properties. The valuation methodology used to develop the opinions of special benefit will be described in a summarized manner. However, the report, due to its brevity, will not present comparable sale data or adjustment grids used to arrive at the value opinions. Assuming that the appraisal is to be used internally by WSB and c ity officials only (for the purposes of determining the increase in property market value relative to proposed or contempl ated assessments), the Restricted Appraisal Report format should sufficiently serve the intended use and at the same time provide significant economies pertaining to the time spent writing the report versus completing the analysis and valuation. These eco nomies are reflected in the proposed appraisal fee. Given the brevity of the Restricted Appraisal Report format, it is restricted for use and designed to be read by the intended users only (in this case the client, WSB, and officials of its client, the City of Medina ), since others not substantially familiar with the properties, project and/or valuation process may not fully understand the report without the supporting information retained in the appraisal work file. To clarify the intent, limitations, and allowances of the Restricted Appraisal Report, it is appropriate for use within the immediate intended user base (officials/staff of WSB and the City of Medina ); it is not appropriate for dissemination to other groups b eyond the intended user base, such as the public, via City Council meetings and/or Council packets posted on the city website. On the other hand, there is nothing inappropriate about the intended users quoting the conclusions of the appraisal report to ot hers, including the stated opinions of special benefit, as long as the appraisal report itself is not presented for viewing by those beyond the intended user base, since the data and analysis supporting the opinions of special benefit is not included in th e report. Should any one or more property owners subsequently appeal a special assessment related to the project, at that point our firm would be able to follow up with a more comprehensive, detailed special benefits appraisal report, presented in an Appr aisal Report format, addressing an individual property, with sufficient data and documentation such that the report could be used for settling the appeal or trying it in court. Additional appraisal fees and time would be necessary for our firm to provide such an expanded, individual property report for an appeal. Proposed Appraisal Fee s Based on the anticipated scope of work involved in completing this assignment, I propose the following appraisal fees: Option 1: Appraisal of 16 Properties $18 ,5 00 Option 2: Appraisal of 9 Properties $16 ,0 00 BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 7 Po ssible Additional Property to be Appraised : Though it is my understanding the City intends to assess only benefiting properties which have frontage on the section of Clydesdale Trail to be rehabilitat ed, I want to bring to your attention that there is at least one property that does not directly front this street but is likely to receive some special benefit from the project. The property is a small retail/service strip center located at 5145 County R oad 101 N. (PID# 12 -118 -23 -14 -0067) which is owned by SOR Real Estate, LLC. The property’s main access is from County Road 101. However, this is only a three -quarter access, with no left turns onto northbound County R oad 101 allowed. Northbound traffic can exit thi s property by proceeding south along a shared driveway extending into the neighboring property, which has access to Clydesdale Trail, which in turn intersects with a signalized intersection providing access to the county road in both northbound and southbo und directions. As a result it is likely that if appraised, this property would be concluded to receive special benefit from the road project, though at a much more modest level compared to a property with full direct access on Clydesdale Trail only. If the City would be interested in adding this property for valuation in the special benefits appraisal , the property could be i ncluded for an additional cost of $1,200. I f this becomes the case , p lease let me know and I could amend this proposal to include it. Completion Date The appraisal report will be completed by February 28, 2023 . Deliverables A high -quality, full -color electronic copy of the appraisal report, in .pdf form at , will be emailed to you upon completion of the assignment. Should the need or desire arise for one or more hard copies of the report as well, our firm could print, bind and mail to you such hard copies, upon your request, with sufficient advance notice. Thank you , Mr. Stremel , for the opportunity to submit this proposal. Please contact me at 651 -646 -6114, 612 -229 -9818 (direct line) or pgleason@brkw.com with any questions or comments you may have. Sincerely, BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. Paul J. Gleason , MAI Principal Certified General Real Property Appraiser MN License No. 4003073 70 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | S U I T E 3 0 0 | M I N N E A P O L I S , M N | 5 5 4 1 6 | 7 6 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | W S B E N G . C O M FEASIBILITY REPORT CLYDESDALE TRAIL PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT CITY OF MEDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA January 17, 2023 Prepared By: Agenda Item #8C CERTIFICATION Feasibility Memorandum Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project City of Medina WSB Project No. 021547-000 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Lydia M. Ener, PE Date: January 17, 2023 Lic. No. 57221 Quality Control Review Completed By: James L. Stremel, PE Date: January 17, 2023 Lic. No. 45782 Feasibility Report Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project City of Medina WSB Project No. 021547-000 Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The 2023 Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project is part of the City of Medina’s capital improvement plan and identified for improvement utilizing a pavement mill and overlay method. The proposed project includes the rehabilitation of existing roadway pavement, spot bituminous trail replacements, replacement of a portion of the trail along CR 101, spot curb replacement, and pedestrian curb ramp repairs. A map illustrating the project location and potential assessments is shown in Figure 1. The total estimated project cost for the project is $518,000, which includes a 10% contingency and 20% indirect costs for legal, engineering, administrative, and financing. The project is proposed to be funded through a combination of City funds and Special Assessments. An estimate of the total amount to be assessed and a description of the methodology to calculate the assessments for the affected parcels will be available at the Improvement Hearing. The proposed project schedule includes construction in the summer of 2023 with substantial completion by late summer or early fall. The project is feasible, necessary, cost-effective from an engineering standpoint, and should be considered for construction as proposed herein. EXISTING CONDITIONS Pavement Surface The proposed project area extends along Clydesdale Trail from roughly 100 feet east of the City’s public works driveway to the intersection at County Road 101. The existing bituminous pavement within this area shows signs of aging including alligator cracking, edge cracking, longitudinal cracking, and transverse cracking. The roadway width varies between 30-feet and 68-feet wide depending on the turn lane configuration, with concrete curb and gutter throughout. In addition to the aging pavement, there are portions of existing concrete curb that have settled and no longer convey water to the catch basin inlets along with concrete flat work/ped ramps that have settled and pose a tripping hazard. Drainage, Storm Sewer, and Other Utilities The existing storm sewer within the project area is in good condition, with no known flooding or drainage concerns. However, many of the catch basins within the area have settled or need adjustments to castings to ensure water is not trapped outside the inlet flowline of the grates. Watermain and sanitary sewer exist within the project area, but according to public works staff are in good condition and functioning properly. Private Utilities Private utilities that have facilities in or near the project area will be notified during the final design phase of the project and will be requested to coordinate any necessary repairs and replacements as needed at their cost. A utility coordination meeting will be held prior to construction to discuss any impact of the proposed improvements. Private utility companies that have facilities within the project area include the following: · Comcast (Cable) · CenturyLink (Telephone/Internet) · Mediacom (Telecom) · Arvig (Telecom) · Xcel Energy (Electric) · Wright Hennepin Coop (Electric) · Center Point (Gas) Feasibility Report Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project City of Medina WSB Project No. 021547-000 Page 2 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Pavement Surface The proposed project consists primarily of a pavement mill and overlay of Clydesdale Trail from approximately 100 feet east of the City’s public works driveway to the intersection at County Road 101. With the mill and overlay, the cross-slope crown of the roadway will be reestablished to a minimum of 2.0%. This rehabilitation method will not completely remove the crack patterns, which will likely reflect through the new pavement, however it would extend the pavement life for approximately 10 to 15 years if a crack maintenance protocol is utilized by the City. In addition to the pavement rehabilitation, curb and gutter is proposed to be replaced in locations where it is cracked, or no longer directs drainage due to heaving or sinking. There are a number of pedestrian curb ramps which have settled below the curb line creating a tripping hazard; these will be replaced with the project. Lastly, a section of bituminous trail and concrete pedestrian ramps are proposed to be removed and replaced adjacent to County Road 101 between Clydesdale Trail and Trunk Highway 55. Permits / Governing Agency Approvals This project will disturb over 1 acre of subsurface; therefore, a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit will be required. In addition, permitting will be required through Hennepin County and MnDOT for work within the county and state right of way’s. Right of Way & Construction Staging/Access It is expected that the roadway improvements can be completed within the existing public road right-of-way. The contractor will be responsible for providing and maintaining access to adjacent properties throughout the project duration. FINANCING Opinion of Probable Cost Detailed opinions of cost for the project can be found in Figure 2 of this report. The opinions of cost incorporate estimated 2023 construction costs and include a 10% construction contingency factor. Indirect costs are projected at 20% of the construction costs and include engineering, legal, financing, and administrative costs. Table 1: Summary of Costs Feasibility Cost Estimate Surface/Street Improvements $428,000 Pedestrian Improvements $90,000 TOTAL $518,000 Financing for the Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project will be provided through a combination of City Street Funds and Special Assessments to benefiting properties. Assessments to the benefiting properties may be considered as outlined in Minnesota Statute 429 and the City of Medina’s Assessment Policy. An estimate of the total amount to be assessed and a description of the methodology to calculate the assessments for the affected parcels will be available at the Improvement Hearing. The proposed assessment map highlighting the benefiting properties are included in Figure 1 and a detailed listing of the properties included in Figure 3. Feasibility Report Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project City of Medina WSB Project No. 021547-000 Page 3 PROJECT SCHEDULE The proposed schedule for the project is as follows: Receive Feasibility Report ...................................................................................... January 17, 2023 Final Design ................................................................................................ January - February 2023 Receive Benefit Appraisal ............................................................................... End of February 2023 Improvement Hearing, Approval of Final Plans/Specs, Authorize Ad for Bids ................March 2023 Receive Bids ...................................................................................................................... April 2023 Begin Construction ................................................................................................... June /July 2023 Construction Substantially Complete ..................................................................... July/August 2023 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION The improvements proposed in this study are necessary within the 2023 Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project area. The rehabilitation of the pavement provides a cost-effective means of extending the life cycle of the roadway, and the pedestrian improvements help facilitate the planned improvements for the broader area. In addition, the proposed improvements constitute a project large enough to ensure a competitive bidding environment, economy of scale, and are deemed to be cost- effective. The total estimated cost for the proposed area is $518,000. Proposed funding for the project will be provided through a combination of Special Assessments and City Street Funds. The proposed improvements constitute a project large enough to ensure a competitive bidding environment and provide for economy of scale. Based on the information contained within this report, the proposed improvements are feasible, necessary, and cost-effective from an engineering standpoint. The project feasibility is subject to financial review by the City. Based on the information contained in this document, it is recommended to proceed with the improvements as outlined herein. 15 13 14 9 20 181617 21 19 3 1 4 5 2 6 10 1211 8 7 23 22 Westfalen T r l Clydesdale Trl Clydesdale Trl Lilac Dr Sio u x D r Hamel Rd Cherry Hill Trl CountyRd101 Hu n t e r D r CherryHillBay Highway 55 Highway 55 Cherry Hill Ct C lydesdale Trl ElmCreekDr Lin d e n D r W Tow e r D r Co u n t y R d 1 0 1 Do c u m e n t P a t h : \ \ w s b g v f i l e s 0 1 . w s b e n g . l o c a l \ r e s o u r c e s \ . C l i e n t s A l l \ M e d i n a \ P r o p o s a l s \ 2 0 2 3 C l y d e s d a l e M & O \ A s s e s s m e n t M a p \ A s s e s s m e n t M a p D a t e S a v e d : 1 / 1 0 / 2 0 2 3 ¯1 inch = 400 feet 0 400 FeetClydesdale Mill & Overlay 2023 Project City of Medina, Minnesota Figure 1 - Assessment Map Project Location Assessment Parcels Parcel Boundaries Figure 1 - Project Location & Benefiting Parcel Map WSB Project:Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project Design By:LME Project Location:City of Medina Checked By:JLS WSB Project No:021547-000 Date:1/9/2023 Item No. MnDOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 2 2104.502 SALVAGE SIGN EACH 5 100.00$ 500.00$ 3 2104.503 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER L F 429 12.00$ 5,148.00$ 4 2104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 231 8.00$ 1,848.00$ 5 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 1120 8.00$ 8,960.00$ 6 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON (CV) C Y 126 30.00$ 3,780.00$ 7 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 20 150.00$ 3,000.00$ 8 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CY 126 40.00$ 5,040.00$ 9 2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2" MILL) SY 17538 2.50$ 43,845.00$ 10 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 838 4.00$ 3,352.00$ 11 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEAR COURSE MIX (2;B) TON 1982 80.00$ 158,560.00$ 12 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (2;B) TON 88 85.00$ 7,480.00$ 13 2504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE EACH 3 600.00$ 1,800.00$ 14 2504.602 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 10 1,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 15 2531.603 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DES SURMOUNTABLE L F 429 36.00$ 15,444.00$ 16 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 17 2564.602 INSTALL SIGN EACH 5 100.00$ 500.00$ 18 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 20 250.00$ 5,000.00$ 19 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER L F 1000 6.00$ 6,000.00$ 20 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 31 50.00$ 1,550.00$ 21 2575.504 SODDING TYPE LAWN SY 282 16.00$ 4,512.00$ 22 2575.505 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 SY 282 5.00$ 1,410.00$ 23 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 600 1.50$ 900.00$ 24 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP L F 600 1.50$ 900.00$ 25 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP L F 102 3.00$ 306.00$ 26 2582.503 4" DBLE SOLID LINE MULTI COMP L F 4313 2.00$ 8,626.00$ 27 2582.518 PAVT MSSG MULTI COMP S F 132 5.00$ 660.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 324,121.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)32,412.10$ SUBTOTAL 356,533.10$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (20%)71,306.62$ TOTAL 428,000.00$ 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 2 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK S F 549 8.00$ 4,392.00$ 3 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS TRAIL S Y 686 8.00$ 5,488.00$ 4 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) - TRAIL S Y 754 45.00$ 33,930.00$ 5 2531.504 6" CONCRETE WALK S F 549 26.00$ 14,274.00$ 6 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F 32 55.00$ 1,760.00$ 7 2582.518 CROSSWALK MULTI COMP S F 992 5.00$ 4,960.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 67,804.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)6,780.40$ SUBTOTAL 74,584.40$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (20%)14,916.88$ TOTAL 90,000.00$ GRAND TOTAL 518,000.00$ B. PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS A. SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS - MILL & OVERLAY FIGURE 2 - OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Date: 1/17/23 WSB Project No.: 021547-000 1 1211823230059 CITY OF MEDINA 2052 COUNTY RD 24, MEDINA MN 55340 600 CLYDESDALE TR, HAMEL 55340 INDUSTRIAL-PREFERRED 293.36 2 1211823240023 MIDWESTERN PROPERTIES LLC 550 CLYDESDALE TR, HAMEL MN 55340 550 CLYDESDALE TR, HAMEL 55340 INDUSTRIAL-PREFERRED 556.31 3 1211823230058 CHERYL LYNN DYKHOFF 552 HWY 55, MEDINA MN 55340 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LAND - INDUSTRIAL 394.98 4 1211823240011 T F DYKHOFF & M DYKHOFF MARGARET DYKHOFF, 3402 ELM CREEK DR, HAMEL MN 55340 552 STATE HWY NO 55, HAMEL 55340 RESIDENTIAL 110.80 5 1211823240022 CHERYL LYNN DYKHOFF 552 HWY 55, MEDINA MN 55340 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LAND-COMMERCIAL 347.89 6 1211823240024 MEDINA RECREATIONS INC 500 STATE HWY NO 55, HAMEL MN 55340 500 STATE HWY NO 55, HAMEL 55340 LAND-COMMERCIAL 562.57 7 1211823240031 MEDINA LEASED HSG ASCTS I LP 2905 NORTHWEST BVLD #150, PLYMOUTH MN 55441 501 CLYDESDALE CIR, HAMEL 55340 LOW INCOME RENTAL 451.44 8 1211823240029 CITY OF MEDINA 2052 COUNTY RD NO 24, HAMEL MN 55340 490 CLYDESDALE TR, HAMEL 55340 LAND-COMMERCIAL 100.01 9 1211823130038 CLYDESDALE MARKET LLC 1625 ENERGY PARK DR STE 100, ATTN STEVEN B WELLINGTON, ST PAUL MN 55108 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LAND-COMMERCIAL 684.95 10 1211823240025 MEDINA MOTOR INN C/O MEDINA ENTERTAINMENT CTR, 500 STATE HWY NO 55, HAMEL MN 55340 400 STATE HWY NO 55, HAMEL 55340 COMMERCIAL-PREFERRED 574.39 11 1211823240027 MEDINA MOTOR INN C/O MEDINA ENTERTAINMENT CTR, 500 STATE HWY NO 55, HAMEL MN 55340 405 CLYDESDALE TR, HAMEL 55340 LAND-COMMERCIAL 182.41 12 1211823240026 CLYDESDALE MARKET LLC 1625 ENERGY PARK DR STE 100, ATTN STEVEN B WELLINGTON, ST PAUL MN 55108 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LAND-COMMERCIAL 316.69 13 1211823130036 PJ NORMAN LLC 875 LAKE ST N #407, WAYZATA MN 55391 345 CLYDESDALE TR, HAMEL 55340 COMMERCIAL-PREFERRED 262.98 14 1211823130037 CLYDESDALE MARKET LLC 1625 ENERGY PARK DR STE 100, ATTN STEVEN WELLINGTON JR, ST PAUL MN 55108 325 CLYDESDALE TR, HAMEL 55340 COMMERCIAL-PREFERRED 448.73 15 1211823130035 CLYDESDALE MARKET LLC 1625 ENERGY PARK DR STE 100, ATTN STEVEN B WELLINGTON, ST PAUL MN 55108 340 CLYDESDALE TR, HAMEL 55340 LAND-COMMERCIAL 122.74 16 1211823130043 WELLS FARGO BANK NTL ASCN C/O THOMSON PROP TAX SERVICE, PO BOX 2609, CARLSBAD CA 92018 330 CLYDESDALE TR, HAMEL 55340 COMMERCIAL-PREFERRED 174.01 17 1211823130044 CLYDESDALE MARKET LLC 1625 ENERGY PARK DR STE 100, ATTN STEVEN WELLINGTON JR, ST PAUL MN 55108 302 CLYDESDALE TR, HAMEL 55340 COMMERCIAL-PREFERRED 303.90 18 1211823130042 TARGET CORPORATION C/O PROPERTY TAX DEPT T-2223, PO BOX 9456, MINNEAPOLIS MN 55440-9456 300 CLYDESDALE TR, HAMEL 55340 COMMERCIAL-PREFERRED 1021.25 19 1211823140156 SOR REAL ESTATE LLC 2866 WHITE BEAR AVE N, MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 212 CLYDESDALE TR, HAMEL 55340 COMMERCIAL-PREFERRED 464.78 20 1211823130041 ASHLAND INC PO BOX 55630, LEXINGTON KY 40555 215 CLYDESDALE TR, HAMEL 55340 COMMERCIAL-PREFERRED 358.33 21 1211823140023 JCF INVESTMENTS LLC ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT, 4567 AMERICAN BLVD W, MINNEAPOLIS MN 55437 200 STATE HWY NO 55, HAMEL 55340 COMMERCIAL-PREFERRED 225.70 22 1211823240030 MEDINA RECREATIONS INC 500 STATE HWY NO 55, HAMEL MN 55340 500 STATE HWY NO 55, HAMEL MN 55340 COMMERCIAL-PREFERRED 23 1211823140067 SOR REAL ESTATE LLC 2866 WHITE BEAR AVE N, MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 5145 CO RD NO 101, MEDINA, MN 55340 COMMERCIAL-PREFERRED CITY OF MEDINA CLYDESDALE TRAIL PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FIGURE 3 - PRELIMINARY ROLL MAP ID PID FEE OWNER FEE OWNER ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS USE DESCRIPTION FRONT FOOTAGE (LF) ME230-1PW-849519.v1 Agenda Item #8C Member _________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. _________ RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 2023 CLYDSEDALE TRAIL PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to a prior resolution of the city council, a feasibility report has been prepared by the city engineer with reference to the 2023 Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project, which consists primarily of pavement mill/overlay of Clydesdale Trail from approximately 100 feet east of the city’s s public works driveway to the intersection at County Road 101, as more specifically described in the report; and WHEREAS, said feasibility report, dated January 17, 2023, has been reviewed by the city council; and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed improvements are necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether they should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; and the estimated cost of the improvements as recommended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The abovementioned feasibility report is hereby formally received and the city council will consider the improvements in accordance with such feasibility report and the assessment of benefitted property for a portion of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvements of $518,000 2. A public improvement hearing shall be scheduled for the 2023 Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project when documentation is prepared, and the city will give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. 3. The city council further designates WSB and Associates, Inc. as the engineer for the improvement and authorizes them to prepare plans and specifications for the proposed project. ME230-1PW-849519.v1 Dated: January 17, 2023. Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member __________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Agenda Item #8D CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. ___ AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE PIONEER HIGHLANDS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT TAX DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Background: Findings. 1.01. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 444.16 – 444.21 (the “Act”) to establish a storm sewer improvement tax district within the Pioneer Highlands development (the “District”) to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain and otherwise improve storm sewer systems and related facilities within the District and to acquire, construct, maintain and improve stormwater holding areas and ponds outside of the District which are for the benefit of the District in accordance with the Act and to levy a tax on all taxable property within the District to finance such activities. 1.02. It is found and determined that it is in the best interests of Medina and its storm water management program that the District be established. The District shall be comprised of the land legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto. Section II. Establishment: Authorizations. 2.01. The Pioneer Highlands Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District is hereby established. The City shall have all powers and authority conferred by the Act in the operation and financing of the activities of the District. 2.02. The boundaries of the District include all property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and are depicted in the map on Exhibit B, attached hereto. 2.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the Auditor and Recorder of Hennepin County. Section III. This ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and publication and the recording of the plat of Pioneer Highlands in Hennepin County. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Medina this ____day of ____________, 2023 Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: _____________________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk Published in the Crow River News on this ____ day of _____, 2023. EXHIBIT A Legal Description of property contained within boundaries of Pioneer Highlands Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District Lots 1 through 4, Block 1, and Outlot A, Pioneer Highlands, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Ordinance No. XXX DATE 4 EXHIBIT B Map of Pioneer Highlands Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District Location of Pioneer Highlands Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District Pioneer Highlands Page 1 of 1 January 17, 2023 Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District City Council Meeting TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Debra Dion, Associate Planner through Dusty Finke Planning Director DATE: January 12, 2023 MEETING: January 17, City Council SUBJECT: Onyx Performance Investment, LLC. – Pioneer Highlands Storm Sewer Tax District – PIN #09-118-23-11-0002 – Public Hearing Background On October 18, 2022, the City granted preliminary plat approval to Onyx Performance Investment, LLC. for Pioneer Highlands. The plat proposed to subdivide one existing lot into four lots. The subject site is located along Pioneer Trail, south of Willow Drive. Staff had scheduled review of the Final Plat for January 17 and intended to hold a hearing on the Storm Sewer Tax District all at the same time. However, the applicant requested a delay to finalize the location of wetland buffers. Staff had already published the notice for public hearing in the paper and therefore are asking that the hearing for creation of the Storm Sewer Tax District be conducted on January 17. The City’s practice is to establish Storm Sewer Improvement Taxing District over development sites as a “back-up plan” if covenants or homeowner’s associations do not maintain stormwater improvements. The City has taken this step in all recent residential subdivisions. The tax district would allow the City to levy a tax against just the property in the Pioneer Highlands development to cover maintenance costs if the Covenants failed to do so. To date, the City has not levied taxes against any of the districts established. Prior to considering the establishment of such as district, the City Council is required to hold a Public Hearing. It is anticipated that the plat will be brought before the City Council at one of the meetings in February or March. An extension has been given by the applicant to March 23, 2023, to finalize the final plat. Staff intends to present the ordinance for consideration along with the plat. Because notice was provided for the Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District for the January 17th meeting, staff recommends that the City Council hold the hearing, close the hearing, and table consideration of the Tax District ordinance until the approval of the final plat in either February or March of this year. Potential Action Motion to table consideration of the ordinance establishing the Pioneer Highlands Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District until the final plat review. Attachment DRAFT ordinance establishing the Pioneer Highlands Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District MEMORANDUM Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 January 17, 2023 City Council Meeting TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: January 12, 2023 MEETING: January 17, 2023 City Council SUBJECT: Planning Department Updates Land Use Application Review A) Meander Park and Boardwalk – Meander Rd, east of Arrowhead Dr – Medina Ventures had requested PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat approval for a development to include four residential units north of Meander Rd, and commercial uses south of Meander Rd including a venue, restaurant, daycare, and speculative retail space. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 9 and recommended approval, provided the twinhomes were not used for lodging units. The Council reviewed at the December 6 meeting, provided feedback, and tabled the application to allow the applicant to finalize plans. The Planning Commission reviewed the updated information on January 10 and recommended approval. Staff intends to present to City Council on January 17. B) Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial – Loram and Scannell have submitted materials for the City to prepare an EAW for a warehouse/industrial development east of Arrowhead Drive, south of Highway 55, to the south of Loram’s existing facility. The council approved the findings of fact and made a negative declaration on the need for an EIS at the April 5 meeting. Staff will route the record of decision as required. The applicant has now also applied for preliminary plat and site plan review approval for construction of approximately 398,000 s.f. of office warehouse on three lots. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their August 10 and October 11 meetings and recommended approval on a 4-2 vote. The City Council reviewed the wetland replacement plan on October 18 and directed staff to prepare a notice of decision. Staff presented and Council approved the wetland application at the December 6 meeting. Staff intends to present to Council on January 17. C) Pioneer Highlands Final Plat – Onyx Investments has requested final plat approval of a four-lot rural subdivision located south of Pioneer, east of Willow Drive. Staff intended to present to City Council on January 17, 2023, but the applicant has requested delay. Staff will present to Council when the applicant is prepared. D) Knappenberger Rearrangement and Easement Vacation – Gail Knappenberger has requested approval of a lot line rearrangement between two properties in common ownership. The applicant also requests to vacate easements adjacent to the relocated property line and proposes to grant replacement easements next to the new line. City Council granted approval on November 1. Staff will work with the applicant to record necessary documents to finalize the requests. E) Cates Ranch/Willow Drive Warehouse Industrial – Comprehensive Plan Amendment– Oppidan has submitted a concept plan review for a 310,000 square foot warehouse/office development east of Willow Drive, north of Chippewa Road. The applicant is requesting feedback prior to proceeding with full design of their project. The Planning Commission reviewed and provided comments on October 11 and Council reviewed on October 18. Staff will await formal application. MEMORANDUM Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 January 17, 2023 City Council Meeting F) BAPS Site Plan Review – 1400 Hamel Road – BAP Minneapolis Medina has requested an amendment to their approved site plan review. The applicant has submitted updated architectural information based on the City’s updated regulations pertaining to architectural elements. The applicant has also proposed minor adjustments to the site layout previously approved. The Council reviewed at the November 9 meeting and recommended approval. The Council approved the amended Site Plan Review at the December 6 meeting. The applicant has indicated that they intend to start construction during the spring of 2023. G) Adam’s Pest Control Final Plat – Jan Har LLC has requested final plat approval for a two lot subdivision for development of an office north of Hwy 55 and west of Willow Drive. The property owner to the east of the site has not agreed to provide right-of-way, so the applicant proposes access directly to Highway 55. Council granted final approval at the September 20 meeting. Construction is underway. H) 500 Hamel Road Apartment Concept Plan – Medina Apartments LLC has requested review of a concept plan review for development of a 97-unit apartment building at 500 Hamel Rd. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their August 10 meeting and Council provided comments on August 16. The developer met with neighbors on September 12 and the parties have indicated that they will meet again to discuss the project. I) Hamel Townhomes Final Plat – 342 Hamel Rd – Hamel Townhomes, LLC has requested final plat approval for a 30-unit townhome development. The Council granted final plat approval on August 16. Staff will work with the applicant to finalize documents prior to beginning of construction. J) Ditter Heating and Cooling Site Plan Review – 820 Tower Drive – Ditter Heating and Cooling has requested a Site Plan Review for an approximately 5,000 square foot addition to its building. The application is incomplete for review and will be scheduled for a hearing when complete. K) Pioneer Trail Preserve – This project has been preliminarily approved and the City is awaiting final plat application. L) Johnson ADU CUP, St. Peter and Paul Cemetery – The City Council has adopted resolutions approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants with the conditions of approval in order to complete the projects. Other Projects A) Hennepin County Elevate Business – I met with Hennepin County Community Works related to their Elevate Business consulting services for small businesses. Hennepin County is requesting local governments partner in the program. Medina’s share for 2023 is proposed at $1250, would replace Medina’s contribution toward the Open to Business program next year. B) Clydesdale Trail – staff has assisted with preparing documents for the Clydesdale Trail overlay project. C) Planning Commission orientation and training – staff conducted an orientation with Commissioner Plec, who joined the Commission this year. Staff also conducted a training/discussion with the entire Commission related to the importance of recognizing the discretion in various actions and of providing good findings. D) Assessment Policy – staff discussed the assessment policy and identified a potential amendment to provide flexibility with how assessments are calculated. Staff intends to present to Council on January 17. E) Hackamore Road – I have been continuing in negotiations with property owners adjacent to Hackamore Road to secure necessary right-of-way and easements. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Jason Nelson, Director of Public Safety DATE: January 13, 2023 RE: Department Updates We made it through the holidays and are off and running into the new year. As you are aware we have had several tragic deaths in the past two weeks. One being a victim to domestic violence where we have a suspect in custody who is still being actively investigated. One where a person took his own life and the other two were medical related. These scenes are hard on all involved and I have reached out to the Metro Area Critical Incident Stress Management Team. The team came out and held a debrief with dispatch, fire, EMS, and police at our agency. What they basically provide is psychological first aid and peer to peer support for our personnel. It was well received with our staff, and they have also been advised to follow up with our department psychologist as well. Officers Hall and Scharf are attending FBI Law Enforcement Executive Development training on Supervisor Leadership this week in Stillwater. Some of the topics they will discuss are creditability, command discipline and liability, dealing with problem employees and leading change within the organization. Anne and Nicole have been busy getting caught back up with coding and entering cases from when our records management system went down for six days. They have done a great job getting things done while continuing with mandatory year ending requirements. I continue to meet with those in our records management consortium on next steps and will keep the council appraised as we move forward with this. Patrol: The following are updates of Patrol Officers between December 27, 2022 and January 09, 2023: Citations – 6 Warnings – 17 PD Accidents – 7 Medicals – 10 Suspicion Calls – 7 Traffic Complaints – 2 Assist Other Agencies – 7 Alarms – 8 Welfare Checks - 3 On 12/30/2022 at approximately 1127 hours officer was dispatched to a suspicious vehicle parked in the 2200 block of Hollybush Road. A resident who lives on Hollybush reported the vehicle had been parked in the cul de sac since the previous night and a window was open on the vehicle. A license plate of the vehicle was provided and when Dispatch ran it, they received notification that the truck had been reported stolen in the city of Hopkins. The truck was confirmed as stolen and impounded at Hopkins request. On 12/26/2022 at 1400 hours officer was called to a welfare check of an individual who was reported to have been drinking and said they were going to go driving out on Lake Independence. The officer located the male and his vehicle stuck in the snow at the bottom of the hill of the boat landing at Lakeshore Park. The officer observed indications of impairment on the individual and began walking the subject up the hill to administer field sobriety tests. The subject became uncooperative and began yelling and swearing at the officer. He was eventually escorted and placed in the back of the squad car where he refused any additional tests and said he was not willing to take the breath test. He was transported to Hennepin County Jail to be charged with DWI test refusal. On 12/26/2022 officers responded to assist West Hennepin Public Safety on a report of an unresponsive 27-year-old male at the Vinland Center in Independence. Upon arrival by first responders the subject was found pulseless, and CPR was initiated. The subject was unable to be revived and was eventually declared deceased. On 12/28/2022 Officer was dispatched to a reported theft from a residence in the 1100 block of Cherokee Road. The homeowner reported suspecting a caretaker who had been assisting with care for his wife was believed to have been stealing from the residence. He reported approximately $25,000 in property missing. The case has been forwarded to Investigations for follow up. On 12/29/2022 at 0025 hours officers were dispatched to a medical in the 500 block of Clydesdale Circle. A male had reported his girlfriend had been in a car accident earlier and was now not breathing. Responding officers and Fire Department attempted lifesaving measures but the female was declared deceased at the hospital. The male provided conflicting accounts of what had happened and observations at the residence led officers to believe more had taken place than what was reported. While being questioned further the male became unresponsive and was also transported to the hospital. Ultimately the male was arrested and booked on a murder charge, believed to have been responsible for the death of the female. Investigations has been conducting multiple follow ups to the case to present the case to the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office for charging. On 12/29/2022 a resident reported being the victim of identity theft. The victim reported receiving notification by mail from the MN Department of Revenue that they had received a 2021 Property Tax Refund application in the resident’s name which the resident said they did not fill out. The application was flagged as fraudulent. On 12/31/2022 officer was dispatched to a possible unresponsive male in the 2200 block of Hollybush Road. Upon arrival the officer was pointed to a male who was found unresponsive in a wooded area off a driveway to one of the residences. The male was found deceased and initial indications was the male committed suicide. The male was believed to have been associated with the stolen vehicle that was recovered earlier in the week in the area. The case has been forwarded to Investigations and are awaiting a cause of death report from the Hennepin County Medical Examiner. On 01/01/2023 at 1137 hours officer was called to Target on a report of a customer down in the self- checkout area. Upon arrival by first responders the male was found pulseless, and CPR was initiated but lifesaving efforts were unsuccessful. The male was believed to have suffered a medical event which led to him becoming unresponsive. On 01/02/2023 officer was called to Target on a suspected theft in progress. Loss Prevention reported a known shoplifter in the store loading up merchandise in a cart and believed he would push the cart out without paying for the merchandise. The male was also reported to have been known to have stolen from the Medina Target on three other occasions and from other metro area Targets. As officers were responding to the call the male abandoned the cart and left Target without taking anything. On 01/03/2023 at 1855 hours officers were dispatched to an unresponsive male in the 2700 block of Bobolink Road. A female reported her husband had been blowing snow in the driveway and fell over unconscious. First responders arrived and began CPR. A LUCAS machine was eventually applied, and the male was transported to the hospital by North Ambulance. The male ultimately did not survive the incident. On 01/04/2023 at 0820 hours officer was dispatched to an unresponsive male in the 3900 block of Linden Court. Upon arrival by first responders the male was determined to be deceased. The Hennepin County Medical Examiner was notified and due to numerous previous known medical conditions and no indication of anything suspicious on scene, they determined they would not be responding and would release the deceased to the funeral home. The officers stayed on scene until the funeral home arrived on scene. On 01/05/2023 officers responded to assist Corcoran PD with a report of cows in the roadway along Highway 55 west of County Road 19. Officers did find some cows loose at a Corcoran residence. Officers were able to contact the cows’ owner who responded and got the cows back in their fenced in area. On 01/09/2023 officer was called to St. Peter & Paul in Loretto on a medical. An adult male was reported to have had a seizure while in the gymnasium. Upon arrival the officer found the male was no longer in seizure. North Ambulance arrived to evaluate the patient. Unknown if the patient was transported. Investigations: Responded to and investigated a death (12/29/2022). The suspect, as Mayor and Council Members were notified, was arrested, and charged with two counts of 2nd Degree Murder, is in custody and is being held on $1,000,000 bail. Investigation is still very active and on-going. Received a report of a theft from a residence in the area of $25,000. Investigation on-going. Attended a Supervisory Leadership Institute taught by FBI-LEEDA (Jan. 9-13). There are currently 19 cases assigned to investigations. 1 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: January 12, 2023 MEETING: January 17, 2023 SUBJECT: Public Works Update STREETS • Public Works has had a long two weeks; the team focus has been on snow removal and ice control. Derek continues to do a great job prioritizing tasks, and although challenging, we are keeping up. • Staff has been working on the Clydesdale Trail road project. The preliminary documents are in your packet. • I am working through the details of several feasibility reports for all of 2023 street projects. WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER • The filter rehab project is moving along with minor setbacks in the sandblasting process. There will be additional professional services required for inspection. • Sewer cleaning and televising will begin as soon as weather conditions become milder. • Trevor Ratke is attending school to upgrade his water certification level, which is beneficial for cross-training in this area. Trevor has proven to be a fantastic addition and as other staff start thinking about retirement, water treatment might be an avenue he would like to pursue. • As a requirement of our Ms4 permit, Jack and I are renewing our erosion control certifications through the U of M. PARKS/TRAILS • Lisa is updating the park and trail asset inventory in preparation for the Park Commission meeting. She is working to simplify the inventory database. In the long run the document will be more efficient (and much more user friendly!). • Maintenance of the trails has been very time consuming after having no choice but to continually push snow off the streets onto the trails. Not having the ability to clean the trails off before the next snowfall makes the layers much more cumbersome to move. If we continue to get large amounts of snow, we may consider temporarily closing some trails. • Residents are letting us know they miss the ice-skating rinks; however, they have been understanding about the weather refusing to cooperate. • Lisa and I met with Ryan Wilson, Scheduler for the Hamel Athletic Club, to begin preparations for the 2023 season contract. MEMORANDUM 2 MISC • Lisa and Greg are working to finalize the last few “Public Works specific” safety manual chapters. We are on track with our goal to have the revamped safety manual complete and ready for presentation to council in February. The result of this project will leave us with a thorough and streamlined resource guide/tool. • Road material bid proposals are due back by no later than 10:00 AM on January 31st and will be publicly opened at P.W. • The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency recently made updates to the hazardous material generator document. We are in the process of reviewing the regulations to ensure the City remains compliant. ORDER CHECKS JANUARY 3, 2023 – JANUARY 17, 2023 053851 ASPEN MILLS INC ................................................................. $1,953.83 053852 BEDI, ANAY ............................................................................... $795.00 053853 CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY................................................. $250.00 053854 ELM CREEK WATERSHED .................................................. $18,501.12 053855 JD DOSSIER HOLDINGS LLC ............................................. $10,840.88 053856 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR .................................................. $607.50 053857 LEACH, EMILY .......................................................................... $500.00 053858 LOKA, AJITH ............................................................................. $500.00 053859 MANUELL, JAMES/MONICA ..................................................... $250.00 053860 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ................................................. $36,562.86 053861 METRO ELEVATOR INC ........................................................... $200.00 053862 MN DEPT OF NAT RES - OMB .............................................. $3,737.34 053863 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTION LLC .............................................. $133.08 053864 PINA, ANABEL .......................................................................... $250.00 053865 PIONEER-SARAH CREEK ................................................... $13,294.66 053866 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES INC .................................. $8,995.82 053867 ROSSINI, RACHELLE ............................................................... $250.00 053868 RUSSELL SECURITY RESOURCE INC .................................... $435.00 053869 SCHEURMAN, LISA/STEPHEN................................................. $500.00 053870 SOLUTION BUILDERS INC .................................................... $5,203.40 053871 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY .................................... $1,152.20 053872 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL ............................................................... $717.20 053873 SWANDA, JENNIFER ......................................................... $118,804.20 053874 THEISEN, LINDA ....................................................................... $500.00 053875 WEST RONDEAU LAKE DRIVE LLC ...................................... $1,000.00 053876 WINDSOR, CINDY .................................................................... $500.00 053877 ASPEN MILLS INC .................................................................... $152.25 053878 BATTERIES + BULBS ............................................................... $362.88 053879 BEAUDRY OIL & PROPANE .................................................. $7,558.47 053880 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC ..................................................... $203.16 053881 CENTRAL HYDRAULICS INC ................................................... $474.83 053882 COMPASS MINERALS AMERICA INC ................................. $16,874.92 053883 CORE & MAIN LP ...................................................................... $111.93 053884 DEM-CON COMPANIES ........................................................ $1,126.80 053885 DIAMOND MOWERS INC.......................................................... $578.45 053886 ENGEL WATER TESTING INC.................................................. $504.00 053887 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL ...................................................... $60.75 053888 HACH COMPANY ...................................................................... $748.94 053889 HAMEL LIONS CLUB ................................................................ $925.00 053890 HAWKINS INC. ....................................................................... $3,734.25 053891 HENN COUNTY TREASURER .................................................. $981.04 053892 HENN COUNTY INFO TECH .................................................. $2,347.02 053893 HENN COUNTY SHERIFF......................................................... $232.74 053894 HENN COUNTY TREASURER .................................................... $98.16 053895 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER ............................................ $35.00 053896 MATTHEW E HUNZ .................................................................. $803.88 053897 KENNEDY & GRAVEN CHARTERED .................................... $8,448.88 053898 KOTHRADE SEWER, WATER & ............................................... $450.00 053899 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT INC .......................................... $43.50 053900 CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN ......................................................... $1,641.93 053901 MARCO INC .............................................................................. $215.00 053902 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ................................................... $4,920.30 053903 MIDWEST SEWER SERVICES .............................................. $4,165.00 053904 MN DEPT OF LABOR/INDUSTRY .......................................... $7,492.16 053905 MOTLEY AUTO SERVICE LLC ................................................. $671.50 053906 CITY OF ORONO ................................................................... $1,474.95 053907 PERRY'S TRUCK REPAIR ........................................................ $645.40 053908 PREMIUM WATERS INC ............................................................. $42.24 053909 STREICHER'S ........................................................................... $139.99 053910 TALLEN & BAERTSCHI .......................................................... $6,038.75 053911 TIMESAVER OFFSITE .............................................................. $154.00 053912 WESTERN ELECTRIC ........................................................... $5,050.00 053913 WSB & ASSOCIATES ........................................................... $52,290.25 Total Checks $358,232.41 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS JANUARY 3, 2023 – JANUARY 17, 2023 006670E PR PERA .............................................................................. $20,853.18 006671E PR FED/FICA ....................................................................... $20,275.38 006672E PR MN Deferred Comp ........................................................... $3,157.00 006673E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA .................................................. $4,546.42 006674E CITY OF MEDINA ........................................................................ $23.00 006675E FURTHER ............................................................................ $35,177.39 006676E MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT ............................................. $724.20 006677E FURTHER ..................................................................................... $0.25 006678E CENTURYLINK.......................................................................... $269.19 006679E CIPHER LABORATORIES INC. .............................................. $1,122.00 006680E FP MAILING SOL POSTAGE BY PHON ................................. $1,000.00 006681E FURTHER .............................................................................. $7,128.49 006682E MARCO (LEASE) .................................................................... $1,837.89 006683E PAYMENT SERVICE NETWORK INC .................................... $1,153.41 006684E THE VALVOLINE COMPANY 68 ............................................... $113.69 006685E FRONTIER .................................................................................. $57.88 006686E XCEL ENERGY ...................................................................... $9,208.85 Total Electronic Checks $106,648.22 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT JANUARY 4, 2023 0512406 MILINKOVICH, JACOB .............................................................. $687.22 0512407 WIESE, TANNER L .................................................................... $701.52 0512408 ALBERS, TODD M. .................................................................... $230.87 0512409 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L. ................................................... $1,054.11 0512410 BARNHART, ERIN A. ............................................................. $2,984.89 0512411 BOECKER, KEVIN D. ............................................................. $3,418.30 0512412 CAVANAUGH, JOSEPH ............................................................ $230.87 0512413 CONVERSE, KEITH A. ........................................................... $2,302.41 0512414 DEMARS, LISA ....................................................................... $1,548.18 0512415 DESLAURIERS, DEAN .............................................................. $230.87 0512416 DION, DEBRA A. .................................................................... $2,095.08 0512417 ENDE, JOSEPH...................................................................... $2,115.00 0512418 FINKE, DUSTIN D. ................................................................. $3,085.65 0512419 GLEASON, JOHN M. .............................................................. $1,825.44 0512420 GREGORY, THOMAS ............................................................ $2,421.12 0512421 HALL, DAVID M. ..................................................................... $2,555.58 0512422 HANSON, JUSTIN .................................................................. $2,570.10 0512423 JACOBSON, NICOLE ................................................................ $909.85 0512424 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. ............................................................ $2,980.12 0512425 KLAERS, ANNE M. ................................................................. $1,733.03 0512426 LEUER, GREGORY J. ............................................................ $2,147.82 0512427 MARTIN, KATHLEEN M ............................................................ $327.07 0512428 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. .................................................. $1,687.95 0512429 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D .......................................................... $2,388.09 0512430 MYHRE, JORDAN J ............................................................... $2,571.30 0512431 NELSON, JASON ................................................................... $3,013.15 0512432 RATKE, TREVOR J ................................................................ $1,864.88 0512433 REID, ROBIN ............................................................................. $230.87 0512434 REINKING, DEREK M ............................................................ $2,638.52 0512435 SCHARF, ANDREW ............................................................... $2,696.35 0512436 SCHERER, STEVEN T. .......................................................... $2,876.19 0512437 VINCK, JOHN J ...................................................................... $1,949.24 0512438 VOGEL, NICHOLE .................................................................. $1,066.92 0512439 WALKER, CAITLYN M. ........................................................... $2,034.66 0512440 BURSCH, JEFFREY ............................................................... $1,249.77 Total Payroll Direct Deposit $64,422.99