HomeMy Public PortalAbout2005-064 Resolution Granting PUD General Plan Approval for ACE PropertiesMember Weir introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-64
RESOLUTION GRANTING PUD GENERAL PLAN APPROVAL FOR ACE
PROPERTIES, LLC. FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF
CLYDESDALE TRIAL, EAST OF COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 101
WHEREAS, Ace Properties, LLC (the "Applicant") has requested approval from the city
of Medina (the "City") for a PUD General Plan for a retail commercial building on
property which is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the PUD Concept Plan was heard by the planning commission at its
meeting on June 14, 2005 and by the city council on June 21, 2005 according to City
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the planning commission reviewed the PUD General Plan for its
conformance with the City's ordinances on September 13, 2005 and, following a public
hearing thereon as required by law, the planning commission recommended approval of
the PUD General Plan subject to certain conditions; and
WHEREAS, the city council reviewed the PUD General Plan on October 4, 2005 and
November 1, 2005 for conformance with the City's ordinances.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the city of Medina,
Minnesota that it should and hereby does approve the request by the Applicant for a PUD
General Plan for the Property, subject to the following conditions:
1. The PUD General Plan is conditioned upon approval of the final plat of West
Ridge Development Second Addition.
2. The PUD General Plan is subject to the revocation of the existing Conditional Use
Permit, Resolution 88-99.
3. The PUD General Plan is subject to the approval of the rezoning of the Property
to PUD-Urban Commercial.
4. The Applicant shall submit boulder wall engineering details.
5. The Applicant shall submit an updated photometrics plan for the Property with a
reduction in parking lot luminaries or show lot line foot candle reductions that
comply with the City lighting ordinance.
Resolution No. 2005-64
November 15, 2005
1
6. The Applicant shall submit an updated landscaping plan that utilizes a perennial
planting for the trellises that sustains foliage throughout the year.
7. The private improvement development plans shall comply with all fire marshall
conditions.
8. The private improvement plans shall comply with all building codes.
9. The private improvement plans shall comply with all City engineering conditions
and standards.
10. The private improvement and public improvement plans shall be approved by
Hennepin County.
11. The private improvement plans shall be approved by the Elm Creek Watershed
District.
12. The private improvements plans shall be approved by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency.
13. The applicant shall submit an application for the PUD Final Plan in conjunction
with the final plat of West Ridge Development Second Addition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the city council of the city
of Medina, Minnesota that prior to the issuance of a grading permit for any work on the
Property the following conditions must be met:
1. The Applicant shall submit an approved final grading and erosion control plan
for the site development.
2. The Applicant shall submit an approved final earthwork calculations for the site
development.
3. The Applicant shall submit an approved SWPPP plan for the site development.
4. The Applicant shall provide the City a cost estimate for the grading and erosion
control improvements.
5. The Applicant shall provide a letter of credit in a format satisfactory to the City
for the grading and erosion control portion of the improvements.
6. The Applicant shall provide the haul route for the excavation work that is
satisfactory to the City.
Resolution No. 2005-64
November 15, 2005
2
7. The PUD General Plan is subject to receipt and City approval of the agreement
of easements, covenants and restrictions between the Appellant and Target
Corporation.
8. The PUD General Plan is subject to the receipt and City approval of a
reciprocal easement agreement involving West Ridge Development and West
Ridge Development Second Addition.
9. The Applicant shall obtain a permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency.
10. The Applicant shall obtain a permit from the Elm Creek Watershed District.
11. The Applicant shall obtain a City permit for grading and shall pay to the City a
fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the
related documents.
Dated: November 15, 2005
Bruce D. Workman, Mayor
Attest:
Chad M. Adams, City Administrator -Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Cavanaugh and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Brinkman, Weir, Workman, Cavanaugh
and the following voted against same: (Absent: Smith)
None
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2005-64
November 15, 2005
3
EXHIBIT A
Lot 1, Block 2, FRANCIS ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Resolution No. 2005-64
November 15, 2005