HomeMy Public PortalAbout1972, February - 1973, Junerl
Q
Beaumont, Calif.
February 28, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular meeting at 7:30 P.M. in the City
Council Chambers of the City Hall, February 28t, 1972, with Mayor Haskell
presiding.
Mr. Paul Taylor, Layman of the First Baptist Church, Beaumont, gave the
Invocation.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilman present: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia,
Hightower and Haskell. Absent: None.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Minutes of meeting held February 14 %, 1972 approved as received.
Planning Commission minutes of February 17 %, 1972 were discussed.
Mayor Haskell noted denial of Variance application for Harlequinn Confetti
for a tight 8' fence around property at 1499 E. Street. Stated Mr. Schubin
of Harlequinn Confetti Corp., has filed an appeal with the City Council
regarding the Planning Commission's decision.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; That a
public hearing be set for March 270, 1972 on the appeal of Mr. Schubin
of Harlequinn Confetti Corp. of the Planning Commissions' denial of
Variance for a tight 8' fence around his property at 1499 E. 6th St.
Beaumont, Calif.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
City Manager to check with Board of Health regarding this operation
and whether a tight fence is required for :health reasons.
City Manager Ward presented proposal for an ordinance to be drawn up
regarding handbills, etc.
City Attorney Berk suggested that a definition be obtained from the
Post Office on what second rate mail is.
Councilman Rodeman recommended that this matter be turned over to the
City Attorney.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia: That
this matter be turned over to the City Attorney for research and if it
can be done, draw up an ordinance.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
City Manager Ward presented recommendation that the divider on E. 6% Street
east of Illinois approximately 500' be modified due to increase in traffic
hazards. Was stated cost to do this would not exceed $2,000.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: That the
City Manager be authorized to proceed with the work to modify divider
strip on E. 6t Street about 500' east of Illinois Avenue at a cost not to
exceed $2,000.00.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None,
Absent: None.
City Manager Ward reported that the proposed Federal Grant on the expansion
of the City's Sewage Treatment Plant is progressing satisfactorily. Mr. Ward
further stated that a resolution, however, is needed approving the program
advanced by Pomeroy, Johnson and Bailey, Engineers for the said expansion.
3X
a M 1
RESOLUTION NO. 1972—.5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF BEAUMONT APPROVING THE PROGRAM ADVANCED BY
POMEROY, JOHNSON AND BAILEY, ENGINEERS, FOR
THE EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING CITY WASTE WATER
TREATMENT PLANT.
WHEREAS, the waste water treatment plant of the City of
Beaumont is adequate for the pr$amt purposes of the City'of Beaumont,
and
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that there will be a substantial
growth both industrially and residentially in the City of Beaumont
in the near future and the capacity of said waste water treatment
plant must be substantially increased to accommodate therefor, and
WHEREAS, the engineers for the City of Beaumont, Pomeroy,
Johnson and Bailey, have formulated a plan for such expansion purposes
suggesting financing therefor, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has given consideration to the said
plan formulated by its said engineers',
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AND ORDERED as follows:
Section 1: The plan formulated by the engineers for the City
of Beaumont, Pomeroy, Johnson and Bailey for the expansion of the city waste
water treatment plant be and the same is hereby approved.
Section 2: The city manager is directed to'do all things
necessary to implement the said plan formulated by the City's engineers,
including the retention of attorneys O'Melveny and Myers and Financial
Consultants to handle the preliminary work necessary to be done in order to
hold an election for revenue bonds necessary for said purposes.
Section 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and it- .should thereupon take effect and be in force.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28sb day of February, 1972.
/S/ Albert Haskell
Mayor
ATTEST:
/S/ Mae B. Goularte
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, Mae B. Goularte, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1972 -5 was duly passed and
adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont
held on the 28% day of February, 1972 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
WITNESS my hand and seal this 29Lh day of February, 1972.
(SEAL)
/S/ Mae B. Goularte
City Clerk, City of Beaumont
�r
3. a
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
Resolution No. 1972 -5 be passed and adopted this date as read in full.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
City Manager Ward presented request for Council authority for Mayor and
City Clerk to sign special census agreement.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign special census
agreement between the State of California Department of Finance and
the City of Beaumont.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
City Manager Ward recommended that the City Attorney be authorized to
proceed with drawing up new ordinance regarding animal control and
vehicular control in the City Parks. City Manager to furnish City
Attorney with necessary information to prepare said ordinance.
Request of 20 -30 Club was presented regarding the Annual Cherry Festival
to be held June 21st -thru June 25t. 1972. The Blash Amusements will
furnish Certificate of Insurance and hold harmless clause will be
furnished. The 20 -30 Club is requesting the City to again sponsor a
Mayor's Trophy, waiver of license fees for the Carnival.
c�
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the 20 -30 Club be granted permission to hold Cherry Festival from
June 21st to June 250, 1972 and that they be granted a no fee permit
for the festival and parade and that Certificates of Insurance be
presented to the City Clerk from the 20 -30 Club and the Carnival.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Mayor Haskell suggested that the City participate with an entry into
the Parade.
Also suggested that the City issue letters to the surrounding cities and
their officials inviting then to participate as an observer at the
Parade.
Communication read regarding Girl Scout clean -up campaign which is
combined with the Boy Scouts this year, asking that the week of April 241 -29t,
1972 be proclaimed City's Beautification Week with April 291 as Scouting
Beautification Day.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
the City Council approve the request of the Boy and Girl Scouts of.America.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Councilman Ochoa suggested that the study sessions be changed to late
Thursday instead of Friday mornings and that Thursday, March 90 at 5:00 P.M.
be set for the Council study session.
Mayor Haskell asked if there were any opposition to this, there were none,
so the Council's study session was set for this time and date.
Mayor Haskell at this time adjourned meeting to a executive personnel session
of the Council. The Mayor reconvened the meeting at about 9:30 P.M.
There being no further budiness, the meeting was declared to be adjourned
following motion by Councilman Rodeman.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Lwou :
City Clerk
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular meeting at 7:30 P.M. in the City
Council Chambers of the City Hall, March 13m, 1972, with Mayor Haskell
presiding.
Mr. Ralph Towers, Layman of the First Christian Church, Beaumont, gave
the Invocation.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilman present: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia,
Hightower and Haskell. Absent: None.
Minutes of the meeting held February 28%, 1972 were approved as
distributed.
.r
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
City Manager Ward presented copies of the proposed ordinance regulating
conduct in public parks, providing for enforcement and prescribing
penalties for the violation of its provisions. Mr. Ward stated these are
the same as had been presented to the Council at their study session, the
only change is that the blanks have been filled in as per suggestions
of the City Attorney and City Manager.
City Attorney Berk stated since the Council has gone over this proposed
ordinance was not necessary to read the ordinance in full if council
approved by a 4 /5fa vote.
City Manager Ward suggested that the various sections which had been
filled should -be read however.
Mayor Haskell proceeded to read these various sections of the ordinance.
Councilman Rodeman recommended that speed of vehicles withing public parks
be 5 miles an hour. All the Council concurred.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: That the
reading in full of Ordinance No. 435 be waived and that it be read by
title only.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
ORDINANCE NO. 435. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA,
REGULATING CONDUCT IN PUBLIC PARKS: PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT: AND
PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION OF ITS PROVISIONS, was presented
and given its first reading by title only.
Councilman Rodeman made a- motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
Ordinance No. 435 pass its first reading.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes : . None.
Absent: None.
MM
ORDINANCE N0. 436. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA,
REGULATING THE DISTRIBUTION OF HANDBILLS, DODGERS, ETC., GENERALLY,
was presented and given its first reading in full.
Councilman Valdivia made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
Ordinance No. 436 pass its first reading as read in full.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and Hightower.
Noes: Councilman Haskell.
Absent: None.
City Manager Ward presented the proposed 1972 Pony -Colt League schedule
for the Council's consideration.
Recommended that if they could start their games about a half hour earlier
would be better. Instead of starting the games at 6:30 would start at 6:00 P.M.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia: That the
proposed schedule for the Pony -Colt League games for 1972 be accepted
with the elimination of the following dates: May 8%, June 26% and
possibly June 27% if needed; and provided that they try to start their
games at 6:00 P.M. instead of 6:30 P.M.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Announced that the study session for the Planning Commission for the
revisions of Ordinance 282, the City's zoning ordinance has been set for
March 16m, 1972.
C�
Mayor Haskell read letter from the Beaumont Planning Commission reference
Mr. Guy Johnson's absences from attendance at the Meetings. Mr. Ward
stated that Mr. Johnson has submitted his resignation. The Planning
Commission is recommending that Mr. Bill Bebee, 1321 Avalon Avenue be
appointed to replace Mr. Johnson.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: That the
resignation of Mr. Guy Johnson from the Planning Commission be accepted
with regrets.
Ayes: Council Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None
City Clerk was instructed to write Mr. Johnson thanking him for his
services on the Planning Commission.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
Mr. Bill Bebee, 1321 Avalon Avenue, be appointed to the Planning Commission
to fill the unexpired seat of Mr. Guy Johnson.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Communication read regarding Comprehensive Health Planning Association
concerning donation of funds from the City. Mayor Haskell suggested
sending them a letter informing them could not possibly fund without
prior application or request and there was no way of donating this year.
Communication read from Air Force Association and San Bernardino Chamber
of Commerce regarding 30% Anniversary Luncheon for Norton Air Force Base.
Was recommended that the City have representatives at this luncheon, and
that the City should host a table at a cost of $40.00. Host table includes
5 representatives from the City and 5 from Norton Air Force Base.
Councilman Rodeman, Hightower, and Valdivia, City Manager Ward and City Clerk
to attend representing the City.
Date of next study session set for March 23rd at 5:00 P.M. in the City
Managers office of the City Hall.
340
Mayor Haskell suggested this meeting be adjourned to meet again March
150 with the Beaumont Irrigation District.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
this meeting be adjourned to meet again as ari adjourned regular meeting
on March 150, 1972 at 2:00 P.M. at the Beaumont Irrigation District
office on Magnolia Avenue.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
ATTEST:
City Clark
Mayor T
Beaumont, Calif.
March 15, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in an adjourned Regular Session'on MarcJ2
150, 1972 at 2 :00 P.M. at the Beaumont Irrigation District Office on
Magnolia Avenue, with Mayor Pro -Tem Rodeman presiding.
Roll Call found the following Councilman present: Councilman Rodeman.
Absent: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Review of the proposed Fire Hydrant Agreement between the Beaumont Irrig.
District and the City was discussed with the Directors of the Beaumont
Irrigation District.
Councilman Hightower arrived at 2:15 P.M.
Recommended revisions were inserted by Joe Rowe, B.I.D., Manager -
Engineer. These revisions to be presented to the City and B.I.D. for
approval.
The agreement between the Beaumont Irrigation District and the Banning
Water Company was discussed.
Mr. Jerry Goven of Monarch Development was presented and spoke regarding
his development on Highland Springs Road.
Annexation fees were discussed between the Director of the B.I.D. and
Mr. Goven.
Mayor Haskell arrived at 3:00 P.M.
City Manager Ward to call Dr. Pomeroy, Citys' Sewage Treatment Engineer
re: information concerning water in the Highland Springs area.
Mayor Pro -Tem Rodeman instructed City Manager Ward to contact the San
Gorgonio Pass Memorial Hospital regarding the north/west corner of 80
and Highland pertaining to possible annexation.
Councilman Haskell made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That this meeting be adjourned.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes:- None.
Absent: Councilman Ochoa and Valdivia.
ATTEST:
d A
City Clerk
ill l r 1 % I t3-dk i_' 11
Mayor Pro -Tem
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular meeting at 7:30 P.M. in the City
Council Chambers of the City Hall, March 27t, 1972, with Mayor Haskell
presiding.
Mr. Stanley Engles, Layman for the Beaumont; Presbyterian Church, gave the
Invocation.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilmen present: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia,
Hightower and Haskell. Absent: hone.
The minutes of meeting held March 131h and adjourned meeting held March
15t were approved as delivered.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
The Planning Commission minutes of March 9% were approved as received.
Mayor Haskell announced this was the time and date set for the public
hearing on the appeal of the Planning Commission decision denying Variance
for Harlequinn Confetti to install an 8 foot tight fence around the
�• property.
C7 City Clerk stated notices were published as required by law and that no
written correspondence had been received for or against this request.
Mayor Haskell asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to
speak regarding this matter.
Mrs. J. Thomas, 1494 E. 6b Street, stated that they are very much opposed to
an 8 foot tight fence around this property and also stated that Harlequinn
is already putting a 12 foot high fence around the door of the building.
Mayor Haskell recommended that the public hearing be continued to a later
time on the Agenda.
Mayor Haskell read letter from Mr. Jon R. Wallace, Beaumont High School
Student Body President regarding painting street addresses on curbs in front
of homes in Beaumont and Cherry Valley.
Mr. Wallace stated reason for this project was to get involved and to
raise money for the student body. A $1.00 donation will be asked for.
Project is being planned for April.
Was suggested that a write -up be put in'the paper at least 3 days before
they start to let people know what they are doing. Also suggested that
the students have name tags identifying them as working on this project.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
the request of the Beaumont High School Student Body to paint house numbers
on the curbs in front of houses be approved and that a no fee permit be
granted to the Student Body and that project should be from April 22nd to
April 29b, 1972.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Chief Richardson stated having numbers on the curbs would be an aid to
his department.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
the second reading in full of Ordinance No. 435 be waived and that it be
read by title only.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
342 '
ORDINANCE NO. 435. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, REGULATING CONDUCT IN PUBLIC PARKS: PRO-
VIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT: AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION OF
ITS PROVISIONS. was presented and given its second reading by title only.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: That
Ordinance No. 435 pass its second reading and be adopted this date.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
the reading in full of Ordinance No. 436 be waived and that it be read
by title only.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None,
ORDINANCE NO. 436. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA,
REGULATING THE DISTRIBUTION OF HANDBILLS, DODGERS, ETC., GENERALLY. was
presented and given its second reading by title only.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
Ordinance No. 436 pass its second reading and be adopted.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Proposed Fire Hydrant Policies between the City and the Beaumont Irrigation
District were reviewed with the revisions noted.
Beaumont Irrigation District to be sent revised copies of the Fire Hydrant
Agreement prior to presenting to City Attorney for preparation of final
draft.
City Manager should be authorized to proceed with the negotiations on
this agreement.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
this agreement be turned over to the City Manager to negotiate with the
Beaumont Irrigation District and that the Mayor and City Clerk be
authorized to sign said final agreement on behalf of the City of Beaumont.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CANVASS
OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD
ON THE 11t DAY OF APRIL, 1972, TO BE MADE BY
THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT.
WHEREAS, a regular general municipal election will be held and con-
ducted in the City of Beaumont, County of Riverside, State of California,
on Tuesday, the 11% day of April, 1972, as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of said City desires the canvass of said
election to be made by the City Clerk of said City;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That pursuant to Section 22932.5 of the Elections Code
of the State of California, the canvass of the regular general municipal
election to be held in the City of Beaumont, County of Riverside, State
of California, on Tuesday, the 110 day of April, 1972, is hereby ordered
to be made by the City Clerk of the City of Beaumont.
349
SECTION 2. That the City Clerk of said City shall prior to the
18b day of April, 1972, complete the canvass of the regular general
municipal election to be held in said City on the 11Lh day of April,
1972, and shall certify the results to this said City Council on the
181b day of April, 1972.
SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original
Resolutions of said City, and shall make a minute of the passage and
adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council
of said City, In the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed
and adopted.
SECTION 4. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 270 day of March, 1972.
Albert Haskell
Mayor of the City of Beaumont, Calif.
ATTEST:
Mae B. Goularte
City Clerk of the City of
f' Beaumont, California
.-1
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia: That
Resolution No. 1972-6 be passed and adopted this date as read in full.
Q Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Mayor Haskell read communication from Senator Tunney regarding the
reassignment of Sgt. Delbert Stockinger nearer his home.
Communication read reference Comp. Health Association asking for contri-
bution of $164.00 from the City.
City Manager to contact Mr. Newcomb of the Comp. Health Planning Assoc.
reference explaining what they do and this matter be held over the next
council meeting.
Communication read regarding request of residents on California between
10Lh and 11tb for a Street Light. Referred to the City Manager.
Mayor Haskell at this time continued the public hearing on the appeal of
Harlequinn Confetti, stated that this hearing will be continued to the
next regular meeting and that Mr. Shubin be notified to appear before
the Council at the next meeting being April. 10W.
Mr. Conley of Beaumont Planning Commission spoke and stated the reasons
the Planning Commission had denied the application for a Variance.
Mrs Mary Stensland asked whether work on Penn. Avenue was completed at
this time. Mayor Haskell stated no the work has not been completed.
Date of next Council study session was set for April 6th at 5:00 P.M. in
the City Managers' office.
There being no further business the meeting was declared adjourned
following motion of Councilman Rodeman.
ayor
ATTEST:
9
i y erk
The Beaumont City Council met in_a regular session at 7:30 P.M. in the
City Council Chambers of the City Hall, April 100, 1972, with Mayor
Haskell presiding.
A moment of Silent Prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilmen present: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia,
Hightower and Haskell. Absent: None.
The Minutes of the meeting held March 27b, 1972, were approved as
delivered.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Planning Commission Minutes of March 2M were noted and filed.
ORDINANCE NO. 437 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA,
PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION BY REFERENCE OF THE "INTERNATIONAL
CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS AND WESTERN FIRE CHIEF'S ASSOCIATION
UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1971 EDITION" AS THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF AND REPEAL-
ING ORDINANCE NO. 391 was presented and given its first reading in full.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That Ordinance No. 437 pass its first reading as read in full.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Request of Beaumont High School regarding limited parking on Cherry
Avenue during school hours. City Manager Ward recommends signs be
posted on Cherry Avenue stating "NO PARKING DURING SCHOOL HOURS ".
Police Chief concurs with this proposal. Was stated this would take
a resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -7 re: "NO PARKING DURING SCHOOL HOURS" signs be
posted on portions of Cherry Avenue abutting school property was
read by title only.
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -7
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT AMENDING RESOLUTION 1970-
7 OF ORDINANCE NO. 369.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FO , TION 1, Part III,Section 13 is hereby amended by adding
thereto a new Subsection to be known as Subsection H.
"H. NO PARKING DURING SCHOOL HOURS. signs to be posted on
on Cherry Avenue as per attached "ExhibitA", which is made a part
of this resolution as if it were set forth in full herewith.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 101b day of April,'1972.
/S/ Albert Haskell
Mayor
ATTEST:
/S/ Mae B. Goularte no
City Clerk
COUNCIL AGENDA 4/10/72
COU
BEAUMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUESTS
PARKING RESTRICTION TO CONTROL TRANSIENT
PARKING ON CHERRY AVE. DURING SCHOOL HOURS
292'
MARQUEE 88'
DRIVE
98'
PROPOSED CONTROL ZONE
i
EXISTING RED 68'
!y
f
EXISTING CURB!____
LINE
PROPOSED CONTROL ZONE
DESIGNATES SIGN
"NO PARKING DURING SCHOOL HOURS"
VE_
i
316'
CHERRY
AVE.
3 4 S
um
d"
Q
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That Resolution No. 1972 -7 be passed and adopted this date.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Mayor Haskell announced this was the time and date set for the
continuation of the public hearing on the appeal of the Planning
Commission decision denying of a Variance for Harlequinn Confetti.
Mayor Haskell asked if Mr. Shubin was notified of this continued
public hearing. The City Clerk stated yes he was notified.
Mr. Shubin stated he was notified of this meeting tonight. He further
stated he needs this fence because of his type of operation, especially
during the summer months, feels the 8 foot fence is far better due to
the high winds.
City Manager Ward stated an alternate plan was offered Mr. Shubin for
a Variance for a 6 foot fence either chain link or cyclone type fencing.
Councilman Ochoa asked Mr. Shubin if he is planning to install the
fence on the North and East side or all around the property. Mr. Shubin
stated north and east.
Mayor Haskell asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak
regarding this matter.
Mr. Thompson, Chairman of the Planning Commission, stated it is his
understanding that for the Council to reverse a Planning Commission
decision requires new evidence, feels the planning commission decision
should be upheld.
Mayor Haskell at this time declared the public hearing closed, and
proceeded to read section from Ordinance No. 282 to the effect the
Council has up to 40 days in which to render a decision if they desire.
Council felt they should study this further prior to rendering a
decision.
Request of Baldi Bros. was presented to place Lot 2, Block, which is
located on "B" St. and Egan and is owned by the City on auction sale.
Was stated the property must first be declared excess property by the
Council and any easements checked out if council decides to do so.
Recommended by City Manager that an appraisal be made to establish
minimum value of land. Turned over to committee to report back at the
next council meeting of April 240.
Regarding request of property owners on California between lOsb and
110 Street for a street light in the middle of the block, City Manager
Ward stated it is quite dark in this block. Council felt further
study should be given this matter, no decision at this time.
Councilman Rodeman at this time stated for the purpose of the Press,
it has been reported by certain people that he was taken to the
hospital over the weekend. He further stated he wanted people to know
he is fine and that the report of this illness was greatly exaggerated
and that he does not appreciate rumors of this type.
Communication read regarding Regional Manpower Meeting to be held in
Perris at the High School on April 13t at 4:00 P.M.
Communication read regarding League of Cities Citrus Belt meeting to
be held Wednesday, April 19, 1972 at the National Orange Show "Orange
Blossom Room ". Social hour is 6:30 and dinner 7:30 P.M. All indicated
would try to go.
Councilman Rodeman stated if still on council will attend both meetings
and recommended the City Manager attend the Perris meeting.
Communication read regarding Mayors and Councilmen Conference of
Riverside County. Meeting to be held Wednesday, April 12% at the
Rusty Lantern. Reservations to be made for 6.
3471
�J €7� _
Communication read from Rotary Club read reference selling by the
Service Clubs at the Cherry Festival ground. This matter referred to
the City Manager and asked him to contact the 20 -30 Club regarding
this matter.
Communication read reference Mayors' Prayer Breakfast to be held
April 15ib in Riverside.
Date of next. regular study session set for Thursday, April 201b at
5:00 P.M. in the City Managers' Office.
There being no further business, the meeting was declared adjourned
following motion of Councilman Rodeman.
Mayor
ATTEST-
City Clerk
Beaumont, Calif.
April 18, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a Spedial Meeting in the City Council
Chambers at 7:30 P.M., April 18+x, 1972, with Mayor Haskell presiding.
The Invocation was given by Rev. O.D. Johnson, of the First Christian
Church in Beaumont.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilman present: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia,
Hightower and Haskell. Absent: None.
Mayor Haskell announced that this meeting was called for the purpose
of receiving the City Clerks' Certificate of Canvass of votes cast at
the April llm election and to install the newly elected officials.
The City Clerk presented the Certificate of Canvass for the Regular
Municipal election held April 111, 1972, The Clerks' certificate of
canvass was presented attached as EXHIBIT A to the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -8
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT$ CALIFORNIA, RECITING -THE FACT OF THE
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY OF
BEAUMONT ON THE 11% DAY OF APRIL, 19729 DECLAR-
ING THE RESULT THEREOF AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS
AS ARE PROVIDED BY LAW.
WHEREAS, a regular general municipal election was held and con-
ducted in the City of Beaumont, County of Riverside, State of California
on Tuesday, the 110 day of April, 1972, as required by law; and
WHEREAS, notice of said election was duly and regularly given
in time, form and manner as provided by law; that voting precints were
properly established; that - election officers were appointed and that
in all respects said election was held and conducted and the votes
cast thereat, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared
in time, form and manner as° required by the provisions of the Elections
Code of the State of California for the holding of elections in Cities;
and
r
�i
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 1972 -6 adopted the 27tb day
of March, 1972, the City Clerk of the City of Beaumont canvassed the
returns of said election and has certified the results to this City
Council, said results are received, attached and made a part hereof
as "Exhibit A."
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That there were four (4) voting precincts established
for the purpose of holding said election consisting of consolidations
of the regular election precincts in the City of Beaumont as established
for the holding of state and county elections.
SECTION 2. That said regular general municipal election was held
for the purpose of electing the following officers of said City as
required by the laws relating to cities in the State of California,
to wit:
THREE Members of the City Council of said City for the full term
of four years;
A City Clerk of said City for the full term of four years;
A City Treasurer of said City for the full terra of four years.
SECTION 3. That the whole number of votes cast in said City
�+ (except absent voter ballots) was 1,213.
C
That the whole number of absent voter ballots cast in said City
Q was 27, making a total of 11240 votes cast in said City.
SECTION 4. That the names of persons voted for at said election
for Member of the City Council of said City are are as follows:
Albert (Hap) Haskell
HowArd R. Hightower
Walter L. Rodeman
Dale 0. Clark
John V. Miller
Mary Ann Stensland
Rea Higgins
That the names of the persons voted for at said election for
City Clerk of said City are as follows:
Mae B. Goularte
That the names of the persons voted for at said election for City
Treasurer of said City are as follows:
Allie H. Obarr
Charles B. Rigsby
SECTION 5, The City Council does declare and determine that:
ALBERT (HAP) HASKELL was elected as Member of the City Council of
said City for the full term of four years;
HOWARD R. HIGHTOWER was elected as Member of the City Council of
said City for the full term of four years;
WALTER L. RODEMAN was elected as Member of the City Council of
said City for the full term of four years;
MAE B. GOULARTE was elected City Clerk of said City for the full
term of four years;
CHARLES B. RIGSBY was elected City Treasurer of said City for the
full term of four years;
3 du
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall enter on the records of the City
Council of said City, a statement of the result of said election, show-
ing:
1. The whole number of votes cast in the city;
2. The names of the persons voted for;
3. For what office each person was voted for;
4. The number of votes given at each precinct to each person.
5. The number of votes given in the City to each person.
SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall immediately make and, upon
compliance by the persons elected with the provisions of Section 11565
and Section 11568 of the Elections Code of the State of California,
shall deliver to each of such persons so elected a Certificate of
Election signed by her and duly authenticated; that she shall also
administer to each person elected, the Oath of Office prescribed in the
State Constitution of the State of California and shall have them
subscribe thereto and file the same in her office. Whereupon, each and
all of said persons so elected shall be inducted into the respective
office to which they have been elected.
SECTION 8. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of
original Resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the
City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the
same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 181h day of April, 1972.
/S / Albert Haskell
Mayor of the City of Beaumont,
California.
ATTEST:
/S/ Mae B. Goularte
City Clerk of the City of Beaumont,
California.
(SEAL)
rr
P,
Q
Q
3`o`
Eb
H. ib
rt 14 n
x
�
m
CL.
c w
o
rr M 1'h rA CD
H
r/�!r$a
O I
N t7d
ro rt it
-
1"Vrr
y
►i W W N.
-
co rt
O� 0
`a o �
.oP,
v a rt
G
re CD I-en
0, V
V
0
V
N
N
�
Q
co
WCCA� n
ON
%.0
d M W r
rt CL (D am
::r as n
m rr b x
V rt rr
n 03 v (D 0
M rt (r G. t-h
t��
w
�
rt ct
�
H.
CG:3�cQ w
x
RD m
cr 0%.4
0 (L O W
t-h 1-t m R c�
as
� Ai
�
tNV
v
v0
IN
t00-o
a"��' 0
ro
cn G
QO ib O
x
14,
N
C n
r) m 0'0 w O
(it rwt �i C
W 93 C a
H
~
00
a
N
w
ko
O
rYt
(D
et 0
rn b W C
LTJ
A
rrn "7 a coo
f01
z
M
O
M
tt
I." c
}21
A
R
a
0Rm�:rEn
rt
W A. rt n. W
G1
rn
:3 W Eb r7
w
V
ON
ED
wA-
00
ON
N
r O W
'��
lb M
"rt7 d�
E:rj
can aP3 W
x
1 a
0
H
1'h
m 0 al
g
iN3
O
co
(=
00
r
r
rC
0
t-h r? f!
f�
0+
ado
rt
O
OQ
�
w � � M
0
N
W
a" w v
_.e
!� W
rt CD
L~
W
00
kA
O
of
P.
V] Z ri
N
N
Fx-9 'rtl
G� W
H
In
i'i
t-o
y
ri
CAW
0 4N
W
I n
00
,_
V
V
CS]
O >
rn
W
w
0
x
sue
+
00
m
'jC1 F
p
'gyp (tY
w
�
00
t7! Ea
F''
V
W
O
c�Nw
0
O
CO
rA
E
i
i
E
N
N
N
tom»
N
W?
CEwn
y
co
W
C3 H
O
` ;
lag
V
oc.
H Cn
H
s
0
E
3`o`
Eb
H. ib
rt 14 n
x
�
m
CL.
c w
o
rr M 1'h rA CD
H
O I
N t7d
ro rt it
-
1"Vrr
y
►i W W N.
-
co rt
O� 0
`a o �
.oP,
v a rt
G
re CD I-en
0, V
0
°`Co��
Q
WCCA� n
d M W r
rt CL (D am
::r as n
m rr b x
V rt rr
n 03 v (D 0
M rt (r G. t-h
w
n CD rt (DI
rt ct
H.
CG:3�cQ w
RD m
cr 0%.4
0 (L O W
t-h 1-t m R c�
Hl '-4 M
0 rt
O° hh CD 0
ro
cn G
QO ib O
x
14,
N
C n
r) m 0'0 w O
(it rwt �i C
W 93 C a
H
~
03 r, r'h
H
(D
et 0
rn b W C
LTJ
A
rrn "7 a coo
f01
M
M
tt
I." c
A
R
a
0Rm�:rEn
rt
W A. rt n. W
G1
rn
:3 W Eb r7
ED
wA-
rt
:3
lb M
c
can aP3 W
1 a
0
1'h
m 0 al
g
t-h N N
0
t-h r? f!
0+
ado
rt
►-a �C CT r+
OQ
�
w � � M
0
N
W
a" w v
!� W
rt CD
rt
w
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: That
Resolution No. 1972 -8 be passed and adopted this date as read in full.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Albert (Hap) Haskell, Howard R. Hightower and Walter L. Rodeman were
elected as Councilmen for a full term of four years.
Charles B. Rigsby was elected City Treasurer for a full term of four
years.
Mae B. Goularte was elected City Clerk for a full term of four years.
Mayor Haskell administered the oath of office to Mae B. Goularte, elected
as City Clerk, at which time he turned the meeting over to her.
City Clerk Mae Goularte then proceeded to administer the Oath of Office
to Albert Haskell, Howard Hightower and Walter Rodeman elected as
Councilmen, and to Charles B. Rigsby elected as Ctiy Treasurer.
The Clerk then proceeded to ask if there were any nominations for Mayor.
Councilman Rodeman nominated Albert (Hap) Haskell Mayor.
r_-
Councilman Haskell nominated Walter L. Rodeman, Mayor.
The City Clerk asked if there were any other nominations for Mayor.
Q There were no other nominations made.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the nominations for mayor be closed.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None. Absent: None.
Councilman Haskell was elected Mayor with a vote of 4 to 1.
The City Clerk then relinquished the Chair to Mayor Haskell.
Mayor Haskell at this time asked if there were any nominations for
Mayor Pro -Tem.
Councilman Ochoa nominated Walter L. Rodeman Mayor Pro -Tem.
Councilman Rodeman nominated Howard R. Hightower Mayor Pro -Tem.
Mayor Haskell asked if there were any other nominations for Mayor
Pro -Tem.
Councilman Haskell made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: That the
nominations for Mayor Pro -Tem be closed.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Councilman Rodeman was elected Mayor Pro -Tem with a vote of 3 to 2.
There being no further business than can be conducted at this special
meeting, the meeting was declared to be adjourned.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
3
Beaumont, Calif.
April 24, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 P.M. in the City
Council Chambers of the City Hall, April 241, 1972, with Mayor Haskell
presiding.
The Rev. Bruce Cooper of the Foursquare Gospel Church in Beaumont gave the
Invocation.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call.found the
following Councilmen presnet: Councilman Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower and
Haskell. Absent: Councilman Ochoa.
Councilman Ochoa then arrived at 7:36 P.M.
The Minutes of the regular Council meeting held April 10th and the
Special meeting held April 18th, 1972 were approved as delivered.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Planning Commission minutes of April 13%, 1972 were reviewed. The
Conditional Use Permit "issued for a directional sign for Alta View Mobile
Home Park was discussed.
City Attorney Berk recommended additional wording added to Item 3 of the
Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit.
The Planning Commission minutes at this time were noted and filed as
corrected.
Regarding request for additional street light on California Avenue
between 101h and 11th Sts. and Magnolia Avenue between 11th and 12th Sts.;
City Manager Ward stated it was his recommendation that these lights be
installed.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower; That
additional street light be installed on Calif. Avenue between 100 and
11% Sts. and that additional street light be installed on Magnolia Ave.
between 110 and 12th Sts and that the cost for this installation be
minimum allowed by City, provided if owners request decorative lights,
cost to be born by property owners. Installation to be done by the
Southern Calif. Edison Company.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
ORDINANCE NO. 437. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA,
PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION BY REFERENCE OF THE "INTERNATIONAL CON-
FERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS AND WESTERN FIRE CHIEF'S ASSOCIATION
UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1971 EDITION" AS THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE OF THE CITY
OF BEAUMON7 AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF AND
REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 391, w4s presented and given its second reading.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: That
Ordinance No. 437 pass its second reading and be adopted.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Request of Beaumont Little League was read regarding Parade Permit for
April 29th from 2:00 to 3:00 P.M. and inviting the Council to attend the
event.
Chief Richardson stated he anticipates no problem, that it is an annual
event. Two police cars will provide escort, one in front and one in back
of the parade.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
a no fee parade permit be granted the Beaumont Little League for a parade
to be held April 292 from 2 :00 to 3:00 P.M.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
MW
VEW
MW
City Manager presented report on appraisal of Lot 21 Block 18 as requested
by the City Council. Appraiser shows value of the city lot at $1,500.00.
Recommended that city work towards purchase of better lot for a second
fire station, possibly on 40 and Olive.
Councilman Rodeman recommended more study on this matter.
Mayor Haskell recommended City Manager request appraisal on two other lots
city owns on 2nd St. and Grace and to report back at the next meeting and
further that this matter referred to Councilman Valdivias' committee for
study.
Request of City Clerk and City Treasurer to re- appoint Brenda M. Dallmeier
Deputy City Clerk and Deputy City Treasurer.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Rodeman: That
Brenda M. Dallmeier be re- appointed Deputy City Clerk and Deputy City
Treasurer.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -9
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR, CITY CLERK AND CITY
Q
TREASURER TO SIGN CHECKS.
t7 RESOLVED, that First Western Bank and Trust Company, a Corp-
oration, be and it is hereby selected as a depositary for the funds of
this City, that accounts shall be governed by the Rules, Regulations,
By -Laws and Practices, present and future, of the Bank, including interest,
service charges, and all other matters whether the same as or different
therefrom, and that, as hereinafter specified all of the following officers
of this City, who have been duly and regularly elected and/or appointed;
NAME
1. Albert Haskell
or
Walter L. Rodeman
2. Mae B. Goularte
or
Brenda M. Dallmeier
3. Charles B. Rigsby
or
Brenda M. Dallmeier
TITLE
Mayor
Mayor Pro -Tem
City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
City Treasurer
Deputy City Treasurer
be and they are hereby authorised to withdraw said funds from said
depositary on the check of the City, signed as aforesaid, and that
the said officers authorized to withdraw funds be and they are here-
by authorized to endorse and receive payment of bills and notes
payable to the City, and the said First Western Bank and Trust
Company is hereby authorized to pay any such instruments so endorsed
and presented to it for payment, including those drawn to the indivi-
dual order of any officer or other person authorized to sign the
same; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said authority hereby conferred
shall remain in full force until written notice of the revocation
thereof by the Board of Directors of this Corporation shall have
been received by said depositary, and that the Clerk be and she is
hereby authorized and directed to deliver to the Bank a certified
copy of this resolution and to certify to the Bank the true and correct
signatures of the above mentioned officers.
ADOPTED this 24th day of April, 1972.
/S/ Albert Haskell
Mayor of the City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
/S/ Mae B. Goularte
City Clerk
355
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia: That
Resolution No. 1979 -9 be passed and adopted this date as read in full.
Ayes! Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Abstain: Councilman Rodeman.
City Manager Ward presented request for Council action regarding adoption
of Riverside County Operational War Operations Plan. The following action
was taken regarding this matter.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia: That
the County of Riverside and Riverside County Operational War Operations
Plan be adopted.and ordered into effect within the City of Beaumont as an
element of the Riverside County Operational Area.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell. ow
None: None.
Absent: None
Communication read requesting no fee permit for the Beaumont Chamber
of Commerce for the Flea Market to be held May 7tb, 1972.
Councilman Haskell made a motion, seconded by Councilman Rodeman: That
a permit be granted to the Beaumont Chamber of Commerce for a Flea
Market to be held May 7b, 1972 and that all fees be waived.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Communication read from the Heart Fund requesting permission to insert
brochures in the City Sanitation billing for the month of May. The
Heart fund to pay the cost of inserting these brochures.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
the Heart Fund be granted permission to insert brochures in the Sanitation
billing with the cost for inserting these brochures to be born by the
Heart Fund.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Communication read from the Cherry Valley Brethren School reference a
Youth Rally and "Teen Age Poll, Religion in America" poll sheet. The
survey will be done by young people going from house to house. Was
stated would be a total of about 50 involved in the survey.
It was noted that since there was no selling involved, permission to
conduct this survey was given.
City Attorney Berk requested permission to attend 3 day Conference for
City Attorneys, the first part of May in Palm Springs.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the City Attorney be granted permission to attend 3 day, League
sponsored Attorneys conference in Palm Springs, maximum of $200.00 be
allocated.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Mayor Haskell read bulletin reference Mayors and Councilmen' Institute
sponsored by the League of California Cities to be held in San Diego,
May 17 thru May 19Lh. Stated that no one would be attending.
Communication read from Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Manage -
ment reference dedication of land in the dunes area of Imperial County
on May lst.
Communication read from the Beaumont - Cherry Valley Board of Realtors
reference bed room tax levied on issuance of building permits, request-
ing the Council and Planning Commission to reject this idea.
The City Clerk instructed to notify the Board of Realtors that no such
tax has been proposed as of this date and is not presently being
considered.
City Clerk presented request to attend the annual League of California
Cities, City Clerk Institute which is being held in Monterey, May 101h
thru May 12th.
Councilman Haskell made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
the City Clerk be authorized to attend the 3 day City Clerks' Institute
in Monterey, May 10M thru 12t, "minimum $250.00 be allocatd with
authority if necessary to use the Bank of America Card up to maximum
$300.00 allocation.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Communication read from Mr. William Cunningham reference whether City
has a City flag.
t- City Clerk to notify Mr. Cunningham that the City has no flag.
Communication read from Insurance Women of San Bernardino and Riverside
County requesting proclamation, proclaiming May 21st thru May 27% as
National Insurance Women's Week.
Mayor Haskell instructed City Clerk to have the Deputy City Clerk prepare
the proclamation and present it at the next council meeting.
Date of the next regular study session, set for May 4n, 5:00 P.M. in the
City Managers' office at the City Hall.
There being no further business, the meeting was declared adjourned
following motion of Councilman Rodeman.
mayor
ATTEST:
City Cierk
a i ,
_S May 3rd, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a special session at 7:30 P.M. In the City
Council Chambers of the City Hall, May 3rd, 1972, with Mayor Haskell pre-
siding. Notices of this special meeting were presented to the Press and
posted as required by law.
The roll call found the following Councilman present: Councilman Rodeman,
Valdivia, and Hightower. Absent: Councilman Ochoa and Hightower.
Mayor Haskell announced the purpose of this meeting being proposed annexa-
tion and sewer agreement regarding proposed development on Highland Springs
Road.
City Manager Ward further stated purpose of this meeting was to discuss
proposed annexation being Annexation No. 1972 -18, Mr. Ward proceeded to
show the council on the map the proposed annexation. moo
Also present for this meeting was the City Manager of Banning, Dave Dixon,
Mayor Crawford, Mayor Pro -Tem Anderson, Councilman Burgess and Councilman
Lamm of the City of Banning.
It was stated there was an agreement in existence between the Beaumont
Irrigation District and the Banning Water Company reference water service
on Highland Springs Road.
Councilman Hightower arrived at 7:36 P.M.
City Manager Ward stated the Beaumont Irrigation District has offered to
serve the area provided the Banning Water Company agrees.
City Manager Ward stated the City is able to sewer the project by gravity
flow. Was also stated that Monarch Development, who is proposing the
project, has options °to buy the land.
City Manager Ward'stated prior to going to Local Agency Formation
Commission, consensus of the property owners, in the project, must be
presented to the council requesting annexation to the City of Beaumont.
Was stated by the developers that they desire annexation to the City of
Beaumont. UNO
Mr. Ward stated this is the proposed annexation to present to the
council for their consideration.
Was stated the council needs a letter of intent to annex by the property
owners of record to the City of Beaumont.
Was stated you cannot annex land to a city without water.
City Manager of Banning stated that it is Banning Water Company policy
that they do not serve land outside the City Limits of Banning.
Mr. Szynkowski, 885 Cherry Avenue, Beaumont asked what was going on since
he came in late.
Mayor Haskell proceeded to explain what has gone in the meeting to this
time.
Mr. Frank Windle asked if land has to be contiguous to the City, was stated
yes. He then asked about Banning annexing.
Was stated strip must be 600 feet wide to be able to annex.
Mr. Szynkowski asked what the benefits City of Beaumont would have in this
annexation.
Im
Mr. Ward proceeded to give a run down on what the benefits would be.
Councilman Ochoa arrived at this time, being 8:05 P.M.
Mr. Windle asked about whether this subdivision being an own your own lot
basis. Was stated yes.
53, 9,
City Manager Ward stated he has a letter from the City's Sewage Treatment
Engineer stating the City may accept 4,000 to 5,000 additional people.
Mr. Thompson and Mr. Smith representing Monarch Development were present
and stated this is not an F.H.A. Park and is not restricted to adults only,
however, this type of Mobile Home Park caters to adults only.
Mr. Thompson and Mr. Smith representing Monarch Development were present
and stated this is not an F.H.A. Park and is not restricted to adults only,
however, this type of Mobile Home Park caters to adults only.
City Manager Ward at this time asked the Banning Council if they have an
opinion on this proposed annexation.
Mr. Windle gsked what steps are needed for the developers to proceed with
the annexation.
City Manager Ward stated owners of property must file letter of intent to
the City Council, Council if they look with favor towards this annexation,
then goes to Local Agency Formation Commission, if commission approves,
then public hearing is held before the City Council.
Mayor Haskell proceeded to ask the Council that if the developers and the
owners of the land ask for annexation to,the City of Beaumont would they
be in favor of this annexation.
Councilman Hightower stated he would be in favor of this annexation.
d'r
Councilman Valdivia stated he would be in favor of this annexation and feels
the same as Councilman Hightower.
Councilman Ochoa stated the businessmen of both Beaumont and Banning would
benefit and would be in favor of this annexation to Beaumont.
Councilman Rodeman stated would help the community and would prefer it
annexing to Beaumont.
Mayor Haskell feels this helps spread the tax base and mentioned the Feather
River Water Project and how this would help the same, would be in favor of
this annexation.
At this time, Mayor Haskell announced they would go to the second phase
this meeting was called for.
City Manager Ward proceeded to explain that the City of Beaumont is permitted
to contract sewer.
Developers asked City Manager if they can contract sewerage with the City,
City Manager stated yes, city is permitted to do so under the Sewer Use
Ordinance.
Would require an agreement between developers and city and further that the
area would be annexed to the City at a later. date. Was stated Public
Utility Commission would not enter into this.
Was stated would have to be a special agreement drawn up, stating fees, etc.
Councilman Rodeman stated if contract sewage, would be specific in the
agreement.
Was stated ordinance should be made a part of the agreement.
Mayor Haskell at this time polled the Council reference contracted Sewage.
Councilman Hightower stated he thought could be worked out.
Councilman Valdivia is in favor of same.
Councilman Ochoa stated he is in favor so long as the City could handle same.
City Attorney stated contract sewer should be contingent upon annexation to
the City.
3-6-(Y
Developers stated would be objection to this contingency included in the
contract. '
Councilman Rodeman stated with this contingency could see no reason it
could not be done.
Councilman Valdivia asked whether if the land would be annexed to the City
and Deutsch desired to proceed with development,, how would this affect the
City. Stated by City Manager, city could handle the same.
Mayor Haskell made reference to the City's proposal of the state grant for
expansion of the Sewage Treatment facilities.
Dave Dixon, City Manager of Banning, spoke regarding this Highland Springs
development and made reference to the Santa Ana and Colorado River Water Or
Quality Control Boards and their reaction. Who will serve what so far as
sewers, feels this is something that whould be resolved as to this contract
and states if the development is good, it is good for the pass area whether
it annexes to Banning or Beaumont. Stated he has report from Neste, Brudin
and Stone and other reports regarding Colorado Board and Santa Ana Board
looks at the drainage in the area.
City Manager Ward stated if Beaumont Irrigation District serves the project,
then City recovers the sewer.
City Manager Ward at this time asked the council to authorize the City
Attorney to proceed with preparing the Sewer Agreement and the City Manager
to work with the City Attorney.
City Attorney stated he felt would be premature in doing this, however,
feels should be instructed to look into this matter and report to the Council.
City Attorney at this time instructed to look into this matter in order to
prepare a contract.
Mayor Haskell stated if there is nothing further on this matter, declared
this meeting to be adjourned.
a
ATTEST:
Cif Cierk
rr
r-!
d'
Q
May 8, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7;30 P.M. in the City
Council Chambers of the City Hall, May 8m, 1972, with Mayor Haskell pre-
siding,
A moment of Silent Prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the follow-
ing councilman present: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and
Haskell. Absent: None.
The minutes of the regular meeting held April 241h, 1972, were approved as
sent out.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Minutes of Planning Commission meeting held May 4t, 1972, were presented.
The only minutes as reported by the City Manager were the correction
of the Conditional Use Permit for Alta View Mobile Home Park's
sign. Also reported would be a public hearing before the Planning
Commission on proposed zone change on E. 6t Street.
Mayor Haskell recommended this meeting be adjourned to Thursday night to
render decision on Harlequinn Candy Co. Planning Commission minutes were
then noted and filed.
Request of residents on Mass. Ave. south of 6m St. to the Freeway for dust
control on their street was presented. City Manager Ward stated would cost
approximately $180 to oil the street.
Mayor Haskell recommended this matter be deferred to the Street Committee
for study and report back at the next council meeting.
Request of Police Department for proclamation declaring the week of May 15tb
as "National Police Week" was presented.
The Mayor proceeded with pleasure to sign said proclamation.
Chief Richardson at this time requested that Citations of Merit be presented
to two officers of the Beaumont Police Department, the two officers being
Lt. Salinas and Officer Rouland.
Mayor Haskell at this time presented Citation of Merit to Officer Robert
R. Rouland and Lt. William Salinas.
Request of Police Chief Richardson to send Officer Fitch to Officers Train-
ing School, July 8b through July 16m. Cost being $450.00, which is
refundable to the City and additional $24.00, which is not refundable.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
the Police Chief be authorized to send Officer Fitch to the Officers
Training School at a cost of $450.00 to be refunded by P.O.S.T. and an
additional cost of $24.00.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None,
Absent: None.
Mayor Haskell proceeded to read and sign the proclamation declaring the
week of May 21st through May 271, 1972, as "National Insurance Womens'
Week ".
Mayor Haskell proceeded to read and sign the proclamation declaring the
month of May as "Senior Citizens Month ".
Communication read from J.T.W. Smith of Monarch Development regarding their
intentions of annexation.
City Manager Ward stated would contact the Directors of the Beaumont Irriga-
tion District and Glen Erie Water Company and arrange a meeting to try to
resolve the water problems.
3`62
Communication read regarding Mayors and Councilmen's conference to be held at
the Rusty Lantern, Wednesday, May 100. Reservations to be made for six.
Communication read from the City of Desert Hot Springs reference road
dedication.
Mr. Rouland, Officer Rouland's mother, at this time invited everyone to attend
a reception in her sons's honor at her home this evening after the council
meeting, 1126 Beaumont Ave.
Date of next Regular study meeting of the Council to be held Thursday, May 180
at 5:00 P.M. in the City Managers' office of the City Hall.
Councilman Ochoa asked about the lighting of Cougar Way and Beaumont Ave.,
was stated, since not in the City limits can do nothing about it. r
Communication read from Bob Meltzer reference plaque being presented,.to
Dr. Fischbach on June 60, who came in second in the Bike -a -thon held
May 70 for the March of Dimes.
Suggestion was made that the City have a bike -a -thon for the March of
Dimes, possible route being Beaumont Ave. to Brookside to Highlands Springs
Rd. to 60 Street back to Beaumont Ave.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: That -the
council would be in favor of a bike -a -thon for the March of Dimes, being
held in Beaumont.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
City Manager presented letter for the Mayor's signature commending Mr.
Chappels government class for their work in cleaning up City Park at 70
and Calif.
Mayor Haskell recommended a similar letter be sent to the Boy Scouts and
Girl Scouts.
City Manager Ward presented request of City Clerk based upon the
recommendation of the City's auditors that the Cash Drawer be increased
from $57.00 to $250.00 for the purpose of making change for the various
departments of the City.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
the Clerks Cash Drawer be increased from $57.00 to $250.00 for the purpose
of making change.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Councilman Rodeman requested permission to leave the state from May 190 to
June 200, 1972.
Councilman Ochoa made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia: That
permission be grand to Councilman Rodeman to be out of state from
May 190 through June 200, 1972.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
this meeting be adjourned to meet again as an adjourned regular meeting on
Thursday, May 110, at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None. Ir
Absent: None. ,
° Mdyor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
t..
L�
Q
May 12, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in an adjourned regular meeting held at
8:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers of the City Hall, May 12, 1972
with Mayor Haskell presiding.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilmen present: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia,
Hightower and Haskell. Absent: None.
Also present, were the following members of the Planning Commission:
J. B. Thompson, Chairman, Larry Parrish, J. C. Conley, Blanche Fries,
and Bill Beebe.
Mayor Haskell stated the purpose of the meeting was for clarification
of points regarding the Harlequin Candy Company's appeal to the Council
for reconsideration for a permit to build a fence across the front of
their property.
Chairman Thompson (Planning Commission) quoted the dimensions of the
property in question located at Xenia and East Sixth Street.
Mayor Haskell stated that the Planning Commission and Council are aware
that the front setback is 60 feet from the property line to the front
of the building. However, in this case the building was constructed on
the site and precise location prior to annexation and subsequent
zoning by the City. Therefore, the building would be on a non-
conforming setback. It was built when it was county area and forty
years ago the zoning was very different from what the City of Beaumont
has now. Mayor Haskell went on to suggest (from purely an aesthetic
point of view) an 8 foot high board fence on the property line, but did
add that there might be a visual hazard. for traffic when Xenia is
opened up.
Don Warner, of Planning Commission asked if a permit had been granted
for the addition to the building.
Mayor Haskell stated there was no excuse for the building or for putting up
the fence without a building permit, and this is going to have to be
resolved. Stated coming back to the main question, would a wood fence
be feasible.
Mrs. Fries, of Planning Commission stated that the way it is now, it is
an eye sore and a wood fence would be no better. You get the impression
that he is doing this deliberately.
Mayor Haskell asked Mr. Thompson if there was anything he wanted to add.
Mr. Thompson stated the reason a variance was not granted was that it was
not necessary at that time. A solid board fence of that nature would not be
materially beneficial to the property owner as discussed in connection to
the application.
Mayor Haskell stated he felt there was no additional evidence presented
to the Council to alter these conditions.
Mr. Thompson, of Planning Commission stated that Mr. Shubin offered no
evidence that was contrary to the best judgement of the Commission.
Then he appealed.
Councilman Rodeman stated there were protests at the Council table at
the meeting.
City Attorney Dave Berk stated there was no change of circumstances that
would warrant a change of decision, then the Council has no choice.
City Manager Ted Ward stated that a variance was offered for a six foot
chain link fence with a 2 foot extension, a see - through fence.
Mayor Haskell asked Councilman Hightower for any evidence for the Council
to reverse its decision. Councilman Hightower stated no; Rodeman no;
Ochoa no; Valdivia no.
Mayor Haskell requested a motion that the appeal be denied.
..3 , 3
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: That
the Council reject motion for review and deny the appeal.
Mayor Haskell asked for any further comments or discussion. None made.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None
Mayor Haskell stated appeal is denied and that the City Clerk be
instructed to inform Mr. Shubin of denial of appeal.
Fire Chief Mike Diebner asked to be recognized by the Council and
presented pictures of the Harlequin Candy Company and pointed out
an accumulation of waste lumber and several other violations. He
further stated that an 8 foot fence would hinder suppression of any
fires.
Mayor Haskell suggested ordinance be enforced on the accumulation
of machine parts.
City Manager Ted Ward stated Ordinance 412 stipulates front setback be
left for parking or planting.
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned following
motion of Councilman Rodeman.
ATTEST:
Mae B. Goularte
City Clerk
By:
aecre.ary
Mayo
.r
no
May 22, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 P.M. in the City
Council Chambers of the City Hall, May 22nd, 1972, with Mayor Haskell
presiding.
Dr. Harold Walling, Layman of the 71+ Day Adventist Church, Beaumont gave the
Invocation.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following councilman present: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower,
and Haskell. Absent: None.
The minutes of the special meeting held May 3rd, the regular meeting held
May 8b and the adjourned regular meeting held May 12th were approved as
received.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Rodeman: That
the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Claim for damages was presented by Mr. LeRoy Snodgrass, 798 Mass. Avenue
for damages he claims occurred when the fire hydrant was flushed.
Request was presented that a letter supporting the establishment of a
Social Security Office in the Beaumont area be authorized by the City
Council,
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Rodeman: That
a letter be written from the Council to Mr. Robert McClure, District
Manager, Social Security Office supporting the establishment of a Social
Security Office in the Beaumont area.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Lillian Aguilar of the Daily Record - Gazette at this time presented request
for the City to take an ad in the Cherry Festival Edition of the Record -
Gazette. The proposal is a combined ad, double face in color, with the
Chamber of Commerce, total cost to City would be $308.00. The balance of
the cost for the ad, will be by selling space on the ad for various groups and
organizations in the City.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded 'by Councilman Hightowdr: That
the City take the double face color ad combined with the Chamber of Commerce
as presented for the Cherry Festival Edition of the Record - Gazette to be
published June 2M at a cost not to exceed $308.00.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
The Planning Commission Minutes of May 11b, 1972 were noted and filed.
Request was presented for Mr. George Janssen for an Exercise Gymnasium and
Massage to be located at 1390 East 60 Street, Beaumont.
Mayor Haskell read letter from the Police Department regarding this request
asking that this matter be tabled to the next regular meeting being June 12sb
so that their department may complete their investigation.
3463^
Councilman Rodeman
made a motion, seconded by Councilman
Hightower: That
the claim as submitted
by Mr. LeRoy Snodgrass, 798 Mass.
Ave., for damages
he claims occurred
when the fire hydrant was flushed, be
denied and turned
over to the City's
Insurance Carrier.
Q
Ayes: Councilman
Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and
Haskell.
Noes: None,
Absent: None.
Request was presented that a letter supporting the establishment of a
Social Security Office in the Beaumont area be authorized by the City
Council,
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Rodeman: That
a letter be written from the Council to Mr. Robert McClure, District
Manager, Social Security Office supporting the establishment of a Social
Security Office in the Beaumont area.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Lillian Aguilar of the Daily Record - Gazette at this time presented request
for the City to take an ad in the Cherry Festival Edition of the Record -
Gazette. The proposal is a combined ad, double face in color, with the
Chamber of Commerce, total cost to City would be $308.00. The balance of
the cost for the ad, will be by selling space on the ad for various groups and
organizations in the City.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded 'by Councilman Hightowdr: That
the City take the double face color ad combined with the Chamber of Commerce
as presented for the Cherry Festival Edition of the Record - Gazette to be
published June 2M at a cost not to exceed $308.00.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
The Planning Commission Minutes of May 11b, 1972 were noted and filed.
Request was presented for Mr. George Janssen for an Exercise Gymnasium and
Massage to be located at 1390 East 60 Street, Beaumont.
Mayor Haskell read letter from the Police Department regarding this request
asking that this matter be tabled to the next regular meeting being June 12sb
so that their department may complete their investigation.
3463^
`64
Councilman Rodeman -made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: That the
request of Mr. George Janssen for an Exercise Gymnasium and Massage be
tabled to the next regular meeting being June 12 %.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None,
Absent: None.
Petition was presented from residents on Mass. Avenue south of 6tb Street
to Freeway, requesting the paving of Mass. Avenue.
Mayor Haskell recommended City Manager contact the owners of the property
on this street to see what they would do.
Mr. Rea Higgins, who lives at the Pioneer Trailer Park, which abuts this
street, spoke regarding this request and stated that this is a health r■�+
hazard with all the dust being created and couldn't something be done
about that.
The request was turned over to the Street Committee to work with the
City Manager reference contacting the owners of the property in the area
to get their feelings whether they would be willing to pay for having
the street paved.
Mr. Higgins asked if the City could oil the street to hold the dust down.
Stated the City Manager will check into this.
Mayor Haskell read communication from World War I, veterans, San Gorgonio
Barracks 1108, asking the Council if something could be done regarding
setting benches at various locations in the City.
Councilman Rodeman suggested contacting the various service clubs
regarding this matter as they are always looking for projects to work on.
Referred to the City Manager to check with the service clubs for possible
projects in setting benches throughout the City.
Communication read from Dick Feist thankigg the Council for their help
during the Beaumont High School city government program.
Communication read from the Public Utilities Commission regarding public
hearing being held June 12bg 1972 at 1:00 P.M. on request of General
Telephone Company to increase their rates.
The following resolution was presented regarding the denial of the appeal
of Harlequinn Confetti Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -10
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL OF
HARLEQUIN CONFETTI CORPORATION FOR A VARIANCE
TO PERMIT AN EIGHT FOOT TIGHT FENCE ON PROPERTY
LINES AT 1499 E. SIXTH ST. IN THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on April 10, 1972 on the appeal
of Harlequinn Confetti Corp. from the decision of the Planning Commission
of the City of Beaumont denying its application for a variance permitting
the installation of a solid, eight foot fence around portions of the
property line of said company at 1499 East Sixth Street, Beaumont,
California. Said hearing was held in the Council Chambers of the City
of Beaumont, and
WHEREAS, no new evidence was presented to the City of Beaumont,
supporting the Harlequinn Confetti Corp. contention, the City Council
of the City of Beaumont elected to exercise the option of considering
the decision further and stipulating maximum time for decision as 40 days
from the aforementioned public hearing date. On May 80. 1972, at the
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, the date
��. for decision was set for May 111+, 1972 by adjourning the regular council
.-.� meeting to this date.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that after reviewing the Planning
Commission findings and reports and considering all the evidence, the
Q City Council of the City of Beaumont voted to deny the appeal of the
Harlequinn Confetti Corp.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of May, 1972.
Albert Haskell
Mayor
ATTEST:
Mae B. Goularte
City Clerk
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
Resolution no. 1972 -10 be passed and adopted this date as read in full.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
A Resolution was presented for council consideration regarding the
reserving of TOPICS funds.
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -11
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,
CALIFORNIA, SIGNIFYING ITS INTENTION TO CONTINUE IN THE
TOPICS PROGRAM AND REQUESTING THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, TO RESERVE THE CITY'S FISCAL
YEAR 1970 -71, FISCAL YEAR 1971 -72 AND FISCAL YEAR 1972-
73 APPORTIONMENTS FOR TOPICS IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS.
WHEREAS, a Federal Program for traffic capacity and traffic safety
known as TOPICS is being implemented under the sponsorship of the
various state governments; and
WHEREAS, the State of California allocation has been further
apportioned to provide TOPICS funds to the City of Beaumont for Fiscal
year 1970 -71 in the amount of $9,522.00, Fiscal Year 1971 -72 in the amount
of $4,779.00 and Fiscal Year 1972 -73 in the amount of $49799.00.
3 b:6
WHEREAS, the City of Beaumont has substantial traffic capacity and
traffic safety problems which would be lessened by the use of TOPICS
funds projects;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Beaumont will
actively continue participating in the TOPICS program.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the'City Council, City of Beaumont,
desires to reserve TOPICS funds and expend the fiscal years 1970 -71;
1971 -72 and 1972 -73 apportionments for TOPICS IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of May, 1972.
Albert Haskell
Mayor of the City of Beaumont,
California ow
ATTEST:
Mae B. Goularte
City Clerk
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That Resolution No. 1972 -11 be passed and adopted this date as read in
full.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Communication read regarding appraisal of two lots owned by the City
south of 3rd Street, being Lots 1 & 2, Block 164. Appraisal shows fair
market value of Lot 1 being $600.00 and Lot 2 being $400.00 for a total
value of $1,000.00 for the pair.
Mayor Haskell proceeded to read proclamation he signed declaring
May 261A and 270 as Poppy Days in Beaumont.
City Clerk to check on whether Board of Supervisors passed a resolution
reference Assembly Bill 325. Also check with City Manager regarding
City Managers meeting concerning this matter.
City Attorney recommends that since it is budget time the council give
consideration to codifying the ordinances.
Date of next regular study session for June 9b, being a Friday at
10:00 A.M. in the City Managers office.
As a note of information, Mayor Haskell stated he would be out of the
state July 12b and 13m. _.
The meeting was declared to be adjourned fo ng motion of
Councilman Rodeman.
Ray&i of the ity of Beaumont
ATTEST:
City Clerk
am
June 12, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 P.M. in the
City Council Chambers of the City Hall, June 12%, 1972, with Mayor
Haskell presiding.
Rev. Smith, of the First Baptist Church, 9% and Euclid, gave the
Invocation.
After the Pledge of allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilman present: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower
and Haskell. Absent: Councilman Rodeman,
Councilman Ochoa asked whether service clubs had been contacted reference
benches for senior citizens. City Manager Ward stated he has been in
touch with the Lions Club in Idylwild reference their type of benches.
The minutes of meeting held May 22nd were approved as received.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: That
the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
The Planning Commission minutes were then noted and filed.
Request was presented for a street light on Euclid Avenue between
120 and 13t Street. City Manager Ward stated he has checked the area
and there are four families on this street who concur with the request and
is sufficient number to recommend a street light be installed by the
Edison Company.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: That
an additional street light be installed on Euclid Avenue between 121 and 13% Street
and that the City Manager contact Mr. Karl McGowan of Southern Calif. Edison
Company to proceed with the work
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
Request was presented from the Beaumont - Cherry Valley Girls Softball
League for donation to cover umpires and insurance costs. Total cost
was stated to be $348.50. City Manager stated only way the city could do
this would be a donation to the league, cannot pay insurance or umpires direct.
Planning Commission minutes of May 25Lh were presented for the Council's
review. Planning Commission resolution reference change of zone on
East 6t Street from Veile to Edgar Ave. from C -2 to M -1 was noted and
C�
recommended that on ordinance be drawn up in view of the Planning
Commission's recommendations.
D
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia:
That the City Attorney be instructed to prepare the necessary
ordinance changing the zone from C -2 to M -1 on East 61b Street from
Veile Ave. to Edgar Ave. as soon as he receives the legal descriptions
from the City Engineers'.
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
The Planning Commission minutes were then noted and filed.
Request was presented for a street light on Euclid Avenue between
120 and 13t Street. City Manager Ward stated he has checked the area
and there are four families on this street who concur with the request and
is sufficient number to recommend a street light be installed by the
Edison Company.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: That
an additional street light be installed on Euclid Avenue between 121 and 13% Street
and that the City Manager contact Mr. Karl McGowan of Southern Calif. Edison
Company to proceed with the work
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
Request was presented from the Beaumont - Cherry Valley Girls Softball
League for donation to cover umpires and insurance costs. Total cost
was stated to be $348.50. City Manager stated only way the city could do
this would be a donation to the league, cannot pay insurance or umpires direct.
368
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia:
That the City donate $348.50 to the Beaumont - Cherry Valley Softball
League.
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
City Manager Ward presented request to release copies of City Audit
Reports of 66 -67, 67 -68, 68 -69, 69 -70, 70 -71, to the City's Financial
Consultant, Bertel Wells.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivias
That the City Manager is authorized to release copies of Audit Reports
of 1966 -67, 1967 -689 1968 -699 1969 -70, and 1970 -71 to the City's
Financial Consultant, Bertel Wells.
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
RESOLUTION N0, 1972 -12
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA INDICATING APPROVAL
OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF THE HIGHLAND
SPRINGS AREA.
WHEREAS, the proposed development of portions of Section 25
of 26, of Township 2 South Range 1 West, as a Mobil Home subdivision,
and the majority of the first increment lies within the zone of
influence of the City of Beaumont; and
WHEREAS, the magnitude of the development will materially
benefit the economic climate of the Pass Community and
WHEREAS, the City of Beaumont and the Beaumont Irrigation
District are fully capable of serving the development with water
amd sewers; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Beaumont has
previously looked favorable upon the aforementioned development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: that the City Council of the saw
City of Beaumont requests that the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Riverside look favorably on the submission of the tract map #4636 by
Monarch Land & Development Company.
Passed and adopted this 120 day of June 1972.
Albert Haskell
Mayor of the City of Beaumont,
California
ATTEST:
Mae B. Goularte
City Clerk of the City of Beaumont
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa:
That Resolution No. 1972 -12 be passed and adopted this date as read
in full.
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
3`6
Report read from Police Chief Richardson reference request for a
Gymnasium License by Mr. George C. Janssen. Was stated by Mr. Janssen
that he does not intend to operate a massage parlor, however would
give massages upon request.
Police Chief Richardson mentioned in his letter that it is hopeful
that a City Ordinance presently being prepared for adoption reference
Massage Parlors will greatly assist his department.
City Attorney Berk recommended that the City adopt by title only the
first reading of the proposed ordinance reference "Conduct of Massage
Parlors ", due to the length of this proposed ordinance. Felt the
council should have an opportunity to read the ordinance over fully
prior to the second reading and adoption. Was stated this ordinance
has nothing to do with the license ordinance, would be required to
have a business license as well as permits for each employee and
operator.
ORDINANCE NO. 438. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA,
REGULATING THE CONDUCT OF MASSAGE SERVICES AND MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS
AND REQUIRING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT THEREFOR AND THE LICENSING
THEREOF, was presented and given its first reading by title only.
Councilman Ochoa made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
Er That Ordinance No. 438 pass its first reading by title only.
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
Mayor Haskell stated at this time, would need an answer reference
the request of Mr. Janssen.
City Attorney Berk felt that in view of the circumstances that a
business license should be issued to Mr. Janssen.
Councilman Valdivia made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the request for a Gymnasium License by Mr. George C. Janssen be
granted on a temporary basis for a six month period and a permanent
yearly license will be issued pending conditions.
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
Request of City Manager for authority to perform work at the City
Sewage Treatment Plant with city employees doing the work. Estimated
cost being $5,500.00 with city forces utilized.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa:
That the City Manager be authorized to proceed with the repair work
at the City Sewage Treatment Plant at an estimated cost of $5,500.00
with the use of city employees doing the work.
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
Request of Fire Dept. was presented to purchase turnout gear as
authorized in the 1971 -72 budget. Estimated cost being $879.50.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa:
That the request to purchase turnout gear at an estimated cost of
$879.50 for the Fire Department be granted.
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
Request of License Inspector to set 1 day License Fee for Cherry
Festival parade vendors was presented.
City Manager Ward asked Ron Schultie of the 20 -30 Club for his
comments regarding this matter.
37
Mr. Schultie thought this was a good idea and recommended that a $15.00
fee be set and that this would not be too much. He did recommend that
the license fee should be waived for local service clubs, church groups
and charitable organizations.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia:
That a $15.00 fee per vendor per day for a license fee be set during
the Cherry Festival Parade and that the City Manager has the authority
to waive said fees for local service clubs and charitable organizations,
etc., at his discretion.
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -13
RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS.
WHEREAS, the Attorney General of the State of California,
Evelle J. Younger, has proposed legislation in the areas of
criminal justice, consumer protection and environmental protection,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Beaumont hereby endorses the proposals checked below:
Criminal Justice
X Omnibus Pretrial Hearing (Senate Bill 649)
X Grand Jury Reform (Senate Bill 813)
X Certification of Counsel (Senate Bill 342)
X Vandalism (Assembly Bills 1085 -1088)
X Bicycle Theft (Senate Bill 147)
Consumer Protection
X Deceptive Practices (Assembly Bill 1937)
X Charitable Solicitations (Assembly Bill 2010)
X Puzzles, Prizes and Promotions (Senate Bill 1136)
X Travel Agents (Assembly Bill 1404)
Environmental Protection
X California Environmental Quality Act Revision
(Assembly Bill 889)
X Coastline Preservation (Senate Bill 100 and
Assembly Bill 200)
X Noise- Pollution (Senate Bills 1247 -1249)
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 120 day of June, 1972.
Albert Haskell
Mayor
ATTEST:
Mae B. Goularte
City Clerk
Council Haskell made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That Resolution No. 1972 -13 be passed and adopted this date as
read in full.
AYES: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilman Rodeman.
Communication read from the City of Temple City reference Senate Bill
776, requesting the city to adopt a resolution opposing said bill.
rrr
any
MW
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -14
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT OPPOSING SENATE BILL 776 RELATING TO
THE FORMATION OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AREA
PLANNING ORGANIZATION.
WHEREAS, there presently exists in the Southern California
area a voluntary membership governmental agency known as SCAG
which is recognized as a functional regional planning and grant
approval agency, and
WHEREAS, such established agency functions as a non - taxing
affiliation of local governments and provides an adequate vehicle
for co- operative regional planning and evaluation, and
WHEREAS, existing state laws concerning exercise of joint
authorities between governmental agencies provides adequate recourse
to addressing those concerns which transcend city and county
boundaries, and
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 776 constitutes a serious encroachment
upon the traditional rights of local city governments, and
t- WHEREAS, said legislation would establish with no opportunity
.-_4 for citizen self - determination the creation of an added layer of
�• taxing governmental jurisdiction, and
WHEREAS, SB 776 would provide in such agency a General
G7 Assembly membership over which the citizenry of the region to be
subjects to taxation have no direct elective control, and
WHEREAS, such legislation provides for an alternate
assessment of local governments without their consent, and
WHEREAS, the Executive Committee of such proposed agency
would hold extensive functional authority under SB 776 with such
Committee dominated heavily by county and City of Los Angeles
representation, and
WHEREAS, voting procedures of the General Assembly of such
agency would effectively require county membership approval by
separate tabulation, and
WHEREAS, such legislation proposes to transfer all existing
assets of SCAG to said new agency without permission of all city
member equity holders to such assets;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that by virtue of above
factors, the City Council of the City of Beaumont does hereby
strongly oppose Senate Bill 776 for the creation of a Southern
California Planning Organization.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this Resolution be
directed to all Assembly and Senate representatives of Beaumont,
to all members of Assembly and Senate committees to whom such
legislation may be directed, and to cities in the six - county region.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12% day of June, 1972.
Albert Haskell
Mayor
ATTEST:
Mae B. Goularte
City Clerk
't 71,
3 72
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia:
That Resolution No. 1972 -14 be passed and adopted this date as read in
full.
Ayes': Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None,
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
City Manager Ward reported on a Shu -Pack side loading, 29 yard,
Sqnitation Truck as requested by the Council, stating that only one
company makes this type and as such could not go to bid. Truck can
be purchased under a lease - purchase plan. Total cost of truck mounted
mounted on Chevrolet chassis is $24,224.49, deposit of $4,244.49 —
leaving a balance of $20,000.00 to be paid off. Was stated that
should the council desire to purchase this type of truck, takes about
6 weeks for delivery.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia:
That the City purchase a Shu -Pack, 29 yard packer, Garbage Truck on
a Chevrolet chassis on a lease- purchase plan for a three year basis.
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
Councilman Valdivia asked whether the slide at Rangel Park can be
lowered, as he had a report that a child had been injured on it.
City Manager to check into this matter.
Fire Report for the month of May was presented to the council showing
a loss of only $70.00 due to fire during this time. Was stated that
the fire Department should be complimented for the excellent job they
are doing.
Communication read from the Beaumont Chapter of the AARP reference
benches for senior citizens.
Communication read reference Mayor's and Councilmens' Conference
June 14b at the Rusty Lantern, dinner to be at 7:00 P.M.
Communication read reference League of Calif. Cities Citrus Belt
Division meeting to be held Thursday, June 291b, at the Holiday Inn
in Riverside. Councilmen Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell
and City Manager Ward indicated they would attend and requested that
reservations be made.
Communication read reference Manpower Area Planning Council meeting
to be held June 15th, 12 :00 noon at San Bernardino Valley College.
Communication read reference Senate Bill 515 concerning emergency
telephone system no. 911 to be nation wide.
Resolution to be drafted and presented at the next meeting urging
legislature to take action regarding the funding the implemenation
of this type of system.
r
�v
Was reported that an ordinance is being prepared regarding the
licensing of Vending Machines amending the City's business
license ordinance due to recent legislation.
City Clerk presented request of Softball league to use the City's
baseball field on certain nights in June, starting at 8:30 P.M.
and stated there have been complaints that the Pony -Colt League
have not been starting their games at 6:30 P.M. as agreed and
hnave been lagging and not leaving the field in time for other
groups to use the field.
Council instructed the City Manager to notify the Pony -Colt League
to clear the field by 8:30 P.M. in the dates requested by the
Softball league being June 15t, 19t, 22nd, 26tb and 29t and that
the request of the Softball league is approved.
Date of next regular study session set at 10:00 A.M. on Friday,
June 23rd at the City Managers' office of the City Hall.
There being no further business, the meeting was declared adjourned
following motion of Councilman Ochoa.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
3. E -I
•
3. E -I
3 74
..
Now
am
r-1
G
Q
June 26, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 P.M. in the
City Council Chambers of the City Hall, June 261b, 1972, with Mayor
Haskell presiding.
Mr. Duane Henry, layman of the San Gorgonio Catholic Church in
Beaumont gave the Invocation.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilmen present: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia,
Hightower and Haskell. Absent: None,
Mayor Haskell at this time introduced two students from the Beaumont
High School government class to the council and the audience.
The minutes of the meeting held June 12 %, 1972 were approved as
received.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
The Planning Commission Minutes of June 8b, 1972 were noted and filed.
Chief Richardson presented report of Traffic survey showing proppsed
speed zone changes on 6% Street and Beaumont Avenue as follows:
(hours of survey being 7:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. basis). Survey made
with the aid of the County.
1)
2)
3)
4)
6tb Street
35 mph
6m Street
increased
6m Street
remain thi
- Veile to Edgar Avenue
- Edgar to approximately
from 25 to 30 mph
Mass Avenue to a point
same at 35 mph
be changed from 25 to
east to Mass. Avenue be
just east of American
6t Street - from American Avenue to Highland Springs Road
be reduced from 45 to 40 mph
Beaumont Avenue:
1) 5t Street to a point at 11t St. from 25 to 30 mph
2) 11b Street to just south of 130 Street leave at 35 mph
3) 130 Street to northern city limits change from 35 to 40 mph
Cherry Avenue:
1) From Cougar Way to 14% Street, coincide with the county
and change from 25 to 40 mph except during school hours.
In the report and survey were recommendations for the removal of
some stop signs, however the Chief felt that in the case of the
stop sign at 14Lh and Cherry Avenue it should remain due to the
accidents at this corner in the past.
Other recommendations were made regarding speed zone signs, stop
signs, etc. Further recommendation was made by the City Manager
and Police Chief to post streets intersecting with 6% Street and
Beaumont Avenue regarding maximum load limits of trucks.
City Manager recommended these items be prepared in proper form
and presented to the council as an amendment to the Traffic
Ordinance.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That Ordinance No. 438 be read by title only and that the reading
in full be waived.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
3 `7
376
ORDINANCE N0. 438. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA,
REGULATING THE CONDUCT OF MASSAGE SERVICES AND MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS
AND REQUIRING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT THEREFOR AND THE LICENSING
THEREOF. was presented and given its second reading by title only.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That Ordinance No. 438 pass its second reading and be adopted.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
City Manager Ward presented report reference benches in certain areas
for senior citizens. Estimated cost being $63.00 per bench for
8' fibreglass type bench. Mr. Ward has been in touch with the
American Legion and A.A.R.P. who have stated they would donate a
bench each. The City Manager is to contact other service clubs
regarding donation of benches. The name of the person who donated
bench will be placed on the bench. Stated City could paint the
name on the bench the first year, however, the following years
would be paid by the service club who donated said bench.
City Manager Ward instructed to proceed with this project.
ORDINANCE NO. 439. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 282 REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM C -2 TO
M -1 ZONE. was presented and given its first reading in full.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
City Manager Ward presented proposal from VTN for Office of Traffic
Safety grant. Estimated grant is between $20,000 and $25,000 and is
considered an engineering grant for traffic studies, etc. Cost to
apply for grant is $380.00 and is refundable under the grant if
approved.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia:
That VTN be authorized to proceed with the grant application at a
cost of $380.00.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell. rr
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
City Manager Ward presented a letter from the Public Employees
Association of Riverside County requesting recognition as the
employees representative of Beaumont,
Mr. Dean Ross of Riverside was present representing the Association
and gave a brief explanation of what the association is.
Councilman Ochoa made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia:
That the City of Beaumont recognizes the Public Employees Associa-
tion of Riverside County as the representative of the City Employees
of Beaumont.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Request of City Clerk for year and transfers from General Fund to
Recreation Fund and State Retirement Fund, estimated $5,000 from
General to Recreation and estimated $9,750 from General to State
Retirement; and $275.00 from Trust Account Fund to General Fund.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: rr
That the City Clerk be authorized to make the necessary transfers
as required.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Q
Proposed ordinance reference Vending Machines was presented for the
Council's consideration.
ORDINANCE NO. 440. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT AMENDING
SECTION 7-1 OF ORDINANCE NO. 333 TO MAKE PROVISIONS FOR BASING THE
LICENSE FEE FOR THE OPERATION OF COIN - OPERATED VENDING MACHINES
DISPENSING TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY UPON THE LICENSEE'S ENTIRE
GROSS RECEIPTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO SUCH BUSINESS ACTIVITIES AND REPEAL-
ING ALL ORDINANCES AND PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH. was pre-
sented and given its first reading in full.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa:
That Ordinance No. 440 be passed and adopted this date as read in
full as an emergency ordinance.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -15
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Beaumont requests partic-
ipation in Award 72/2462 to Texaco, Inc., by the Riverside County
Board of Supervisors for the purchase of lubricating oils and greases
from July 1, 1972 through June 309 1973.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Beaumont approves the following terms and conditions relating to
participation in the County contract for lubricating oils and
greases:
1. Will make all purchases in its own name, for
public use only;
2. Will be responsible for payment directly to the
vendor and for tax liability, and will hold the County harmless
therefrom;
3. Has not and will not have in force any other
contract for like purchases;
4. Has not obtained and does not have under consider-
ation written bids or quotations from other vendors for like
purchases.
DATED: June 26b, 1972.
City of Beaumont
By Albert Haskell
Mayor
ATTEST:
Mae B. Goularte
City Clerk
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Rodeman:
That Resolution No. 1972 -15 be passed and adopted this date as read
in full.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
City Manager Ward presented request of Mrs. Harter of the A.A.R.P.
to support a resolution to the Board of Supervisors that senior
citizens 62 and over be allowed into Bogart Park free of charge.
7T
Mrs. Owings of the Chamber of Commerce stated that the entrance fee
to the park is 25 cents per person if you walk in and 50 cents per car,
further that it costs $1.00 per adult for fishing and .50 per juvenile
to fish.
Mr. Higgins stated that where you pay for fishing, you do not have to
have a fishing license.
Was not known whether a fishing license is required now or not. When
the lake first opened, adults were required to have a fishing license.
City Manager Ward is to check this out.
Councilman Rodeman felt that-the senior citizens should be allowed Vr
free admission to Bogart Park.
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -16
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT REQUESTING A WAIVER OF FEES FOR SENIOR
CITIZENS.
WHEREAS: the majority of Senior Citizens, in the Pass Community
are living under severe financial limitations and
WHEREAS; the County facilities at Bogart Park are within the
Recreation area for our Senior Citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Beaumont
requests that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside waive
entry fees to County Parks for Citizens aged sixty -two and over.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of Jue 197
Albert Haskell
Mayor
ATTEST:
Mae B, Goularte
City Clerk
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa:
That Resolution No. 1972 -16 be passed and adopted this date.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Request of CEDU Foundation of Running Springs, for permit to solicit
funds door -to -door from August 1, 1972 to January 1, 1973 was presented.
This matter was turned over to the Police Chief for processing.
City Attorney Berk requested council authority to withdraw the City's
claim reference smog control devices.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the City Attorney comply with the request of the Attorney
General of the State of California and that the city withdraw from
the lawsuit reference smog control devices against the auto manufact-
urers..
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower, and Haskell. um
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Mayor Haskell stated that the report reference Manpower Association
Planning Council is available for the council to look over.
Communication read from Senator Tunney reference Revenue Sharing.
Communication read from the City of Westminister reference resolu-
tions urging State Legislature to adopt laws simplifying and
modernizing the judicial process.
t-
TIt
Cr
C�
Was stated the City has adopted a resolution endorsing the Attorney
General's legislative proposals which answers the same purpose as
the request of the City of Westminster.
Communication read from the League of Cities reference Subdivision
Map Act. City Manager to check into this matter.
Was announced that the continued hearing before the Board of Super-
visors reference Tract 4636, Monarch Development will be held
Tuesday, June 27Lh, 1972.
Was announced that the Department of Development installation of
officers will be held July 11% at the Highland Springs Resort,
dinner at 7:00 P.M. and attitude adjustment hour at 6:00 P.M.
Mr. Rea Higgins asked about the sales tax on Gasoline effective
July 1st.
Budget study sessions to start Wednesday, July 5m9 first one being
Safety - Police and Fire Departments at 10 :00 A.M.
Date of next regular study session set for July 7b at 10:00 A.M.
Friday.
Request of Councilman Rodeman presented to be absent from the state
for the next council meeting.
Councilman Haskell made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa;
That the request of Councilman Rodeman be approved.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
There being no further business, the meeting was declared
adjourned following motion of Councilman e
A Bert Haskell
Mayor
25 =-
ATTEST:
Mae B.Goularte
City Clerk
July 10th 9 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7 :30 P.M. in
the City Council Chambers at the City Hall, July 10th, 1972, with
Mayor Haskell presiding.
Mr. Richard Johnson of the Cherry Valley Brethren Church, gave the
Invocation.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilmen present: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia,
Hightower and Haskell. Absent: None.
The minutes of the meeting held June ;26 %, 1972 were approved as
received.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia:
That the bills be paid as audited.
Ayer: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Was reported there were no Planning Commission Minutes to present.
3"
380
ORDINANCE NO. 439• AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 282 REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM C -2 TO
M -1 ZONE was presented and given its second reading by title only.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa:
That Ordinance No. 439 pass its second reading and be adopted.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 369; �■r
RESCINDING RESOLUTIONS 1970 -7, 1971 -32, 1972 -7
AND ALL OTHER RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH
AND PRESCRIBING CERTAIN THROUGH HIGHWAYS AND STOP
INTERSECTIONS, REGULATING SPEED ZONES, PARKING
ZONES AND OTHER REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE FLOW
OF TRAFFIC WITHIN THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
PART I. THROUGH HIGHWAYS, ARTERIALS, AND .STOP INTERSECTIONS
Section I. Through Highways:
A. Sixth Street from the East City Limits to the West City Limits,
B. Beaumont Avenue from the South City Limits to the North City Limits.
(1) Sixth Street and Beaumont Avenue are designated as "through
streets; except that the intersection of Sixth Street and
Beaumont Avenue shall be controlled by an automatic traffic
signal.
(a) Sixth Street at Maple Avenue shall have a flashing amber
for the east -west Sixth Street traffic to be actuated
to an amber than red signal for the entrance of fire
equipment from Maple Avenue Fire Station onto Sixth Street.
(2) All of the aforementioned or any portion thereof may be changed
by the Chief of Police or his designate to facilitate the move-
ment of traffic.
C. Highways Sixty (60) from the east end junction with the Freeway
(Interstate 10) and to the West City Limits.
(1) Highway 60 is designated as a "through street" (expressway) from
its origin to the West City Limits,
Section 2. Major Arterials: Those streets which provide primary traffic
flow in the traffic system, other than through highways as stipulated in
Section 1 hereof, which takes precedence, are hereby designated as major
arterial streets. Traffic flow on intersecting streets shall be caused to
half at a major arterial street and stop signs shall be erected on each inter -
arterial. Major arterials shall include, but are not necessarily limited
to the following:
A. Pennsylvania Avenue from south origin to and including Fourteenth Street.
B. Palm Avenue from Fifth Street to and including Fourteenth Street.
C. California Avenue from the South City Limits to, but not including Eleventh
Street.
D. Elm Avenue from Sixth Street to North City Limits.
381,
E. Fourteenth Street from the East City Limits to the West City Limits.
F. Eighth Street from the East City Limits to Wellwood Avenue.
G. Highland Springs Road, west side only, from the South City Limits to
the North City Limits.
Section 3. Secondary Arterials: Those streets which provide collector
traffic flow to through streets and major arterials in the traffic system
are hereby designated as secondary arterials. The intersection of any
residential street with a secondary arterial is stipulated as a Stop
Intersection. Secondary arterials shall include the following:
A. Twelfth Street
B. Eleventh Street
C. Fifth Street
D. Fourth Street from California Avenue to the West City Limits.
E. First Street
F. Cherry Avenue from Fourteenth Street (Fourteenth excluded)
west side only, to Northern City Limits.
d'
Section 4. Priority Residential: Those streets which provide
Q
feeder traffic flow to through streets, major arterials or secondary
arterials are hereby designated as priority residential or feeder
streets. Traffic flow on intersecting residential streets shall be
caused to halt at a priority residential street and stop signs shall
be erected on each intersecting street at or near the entrance to its
intersection with the priority residential streets. Priority residential
shall include the following:
A. Michigan Avenue
B. Chestnut Avenue
C. Orange Avenue
D. Edgar Avenue
E. Wellwood Avenue
F. B Street from, but not including, Fourth Street to end at
Minnesota Avenue.
G. Veile Street from, but not including, Sixth Street to, but
including, B Street.
H. Third Street from, but not including, Pennsylvania Avenue
to, but not including, California Avenue.
Section 5. Three -Way Stops: Irrespective of the provisions
Section 2, 3, and 4 hereof, the following Intersections are designated
as three -way stop intersections and a stop sign shall be erected at
such entrance to these intersections. to wit:
A. Maple Avenue and Seventh Street
B. Antonell Court and Pennsylvania Avenue
(1) Both of the aforementioned or any portion thereof
may be changed by the Chief of Police or his
designate to facilitate the movement of traffic.
Section 6. Four -Way Stops: Irrespective of the provisions of
Section 2, 39 49and 5 hereof, the following intersections are desig-
nated as four- way stop intersections and a stop sign shall be erected
at each entrance to these intersections, to wit:
U82
A. Eighth Street and Pennsylvania Avenue
B. Eighth Street and Palm Avenue
C. Eighth Street and Maple Avenue
D. Eighth Street and California Avenue
E. Ninth Street and Orange Avenue
F. Tenth Street and Maple Avenue
G. Twelfth Street and Orange Avenue
H. Thirteenth Street and Orange Avenue
I. Highland Springs Road and Eighth Street, a boundary line
intersection.
Section 7. Stop Intersection Exceptions: Precedence for Arterial
Stops shall be in the following order of priority:
A. Through Streets
B. Major Arterials
C. Secondary Arterials
D. Priority Residential Streets
(1) In addition to the above, the following indicated inter-
sections will be Stop Intersections:
a. Thirteenth Street and Massachusetts Avenue for north
and southbound traffic on Massachusetts Avenue.
b. Thirteenth Street and Maple Avenue for northbound
traffic on Maple Avenue.
c. Thirteenth Street and San Miguel for southbound traffic moo
on San Miguel.
d. Thirteenth Street and Euclid Avenue for northbound
traffic on Euclid.
e. Thirteenth Street and Avalon Street for southbound
traffic on Q,valon.
f. Maple Avenue and Ninth Street for east and westbound
traffic on Ninth.
g. Magnolia Avenue and Seventh Street for east and
westbound traffic on Seventh Street.
h. Euclid Avenue and Seventh Street for east and
westbound traffic on Seventh Street.
i. Edgar Avenue and Ninth Street for north and south-
bound traffic on Edgar Avenue.
j. Third Street and Olive Avenue for westbound traffic
on Third Street.
k. Third Street and Grace Avenue for east and westbound
traffic on Third Street,
1. Fourteenth Street and Cherry Avenue for eastbound
traffic on Fourteenth Street.
m. Cherry Avenue and Fourteenth Street for south-
bound traffic on Cherry Avenue.
n. Palm Avenue and Fifth Street for southbound traffic
on Palm Avenue.
Section 8. Yield Signs: Yield signs requiring an approach-
ing vehicle to yield the right -of -way to a vehicle traveling on the
cross street protected by a yield sign installation, shall be
installed at the following intersections:
A. Egan Avenue at California .Avenue.
(1) The aforementioned may be changed by the Chief of Police
or his designate to a stop intersection to facilitate
traffic safety.
PART II. SPEED REGULATIONS
A. Twenty -five (25) mile per hour zones:
(1) Pennsylvania Avenue from Fourteenth Street to south
end.
(2) Fourth Street from California Avenue to West City
Limits.
(3) First Street from East City Limits to Minnesota
Avenue.
(4) Eighth Street from Illinois Avenue to Wellwood Avenue.
(5) California Avenue from Sixth Street to South City
Limits.
(6) B Street from Fourth Street to west end.
(7) Elm Avenue from Sixth Street to North City Limits.
(8) Cougar Way (Sixteenth Street) from Cherry Avenue to West
City Limits (except that section of cougar Avenue, a
boundary line street as covered in Section 22359 CVC).
B. Thirty (30) mile per hour zones:
(1) Sixth Street from Massachusetts Avenue to Egan Avenue.
(2) Beaumont Avenue from Eleventh Street to Interstate 10.
C. Thirty -five (35) mile per hour zones:
(1) Sixth Street from Massachusetts Avenue to American
Avenue.
(2) Sixth Street from Egan Avenue to West City Limits.
(3) Beaumont Avenue from Eleventh Street to Thirteenth
Street.
(4) Fourteenth Street from East City Limits to West City
Limits. (except that section of 14Lh Street lying between
Beaumont Avenue and the West City Limits, a boundry line
street as covered in Section 22359 CVC).
Section
9. Maximum Speed Limit: In accordance with the
provisions of
Sections 22352922357,
and 22358 of the State of California
Vehicle Code,
the maximum speed of
any vehicle upon any city street
shall be twenty -five (25) miles per
hour except as noted in Section 10
hereof.
r-1
Section
10. Speed Limit Exceptions:
When so posted with legally
constituted signs and stenciled on
the surface of the pavement, the
C�
maximum speed
on certain city streets
shall be &s follows:
Q
A. Twenty -five (25) mile per hour zones:
(1) Pennsylvania Avenue from Fourteenth Street to south
end.
(2) Fourth Street from California Avenue to West City
Limits.
(3) First Street from East City Limits to Minnesota
Avenue.
(4) Eighth Street from Illinois Avenue to Wellwood Avenue.
(5) California Avenue from Sixth Street to South City
Limits.
(6) B Street from Fourth Street to west end.
(7) Elm Avenue from Sixth Street to North City Limits.
(8) Cougar Way (Sixteenth Street) from Cherry Avenue to West
City Limits (except that section of cougar Avenue, a
boundary line street as covered in Section 22359 CVC).
B. Thirty (30) mile per hour zones:
(1) Sixth Street from Massachusetts Avenue to Egan Avenue.
(2) Beaumont Avenue from Eleventh Street to Interstate 10.
C. Thirty -five (35) mile per hour zones:
(1) Sixth Street from Massachusetts Avenue to American
Avenue.
(2) Sixth Street from Egan Avenue to West City Limits.
(3) Beaumont Avenue from Eleventh Street to Thirteenth
Street.
(4) Fourteenth Street from East City Limits to West City
Limits. (except that section of 14Lh Street lying between
Beaumont Avenue and the West City Limits, a boundry line
street as covered in Section 22359 CVC).
3'84
(5) Eighth Street from East City Limits to 112 feet
east of Allegheny Avenue (except that section of
lighth Street, a boundary line street as covered
in Section 22359 CVC).
(6) Highland Springs Avenue from the North City Limits
to the South City Limits (except that section of
Highland Springs Avenue, a boundary line street,
as covered in Section 22359 CVC).
C. Forty (40) mile per hour zones:
(1) Sixth Street from American Avenue to East City
Limits.
(2) Beaumont Avenue from Thirteenth Street to North City
Limits.
(3) Cherry Avenue from Fourteenth Street to Norty City
Limits.(except that section of Cherry Xvenue, a
boundary line street as covered in Section 22359 CVC)
D. Highways governed by other jurisdictions within the City Limits
of Beaumont:
(1) Beaumont Avenue (State Highway 79) from Fifth
Street to South City Limits posted by State
Department of Public Works at 35 MPH.
(2) State Highway 60 from West City Limits to
junction with Interstate 10 posted by State
Department of Public Works at 65 MPH.
(3) Interstate 10 from East City Limits to West City
Limits posted by State Department of Public
Works at 70 MPH.
Section 11. Speed Zones: Approximately 200 feet prior to the
beginning of any reduced speed zone within the City of Beaumont,
California, a proper warning sign indicating the approach of the
reduced speed zone shall be posted.
PART III. PARKING REGULATIONS
Section 12. Authority for Local Parking Regulations: Local
authorities may be by ordinance or resolution prohibit or restrict the
parking or standing of vehicles on certain streets or highways, or portions
thereof, during all or certain hours of the day as prescribed in Section
22507 of the California Vehicle Code.
Section 13. Parking Restrictions (Curb Markings): As prescribed
in Section 21458 of the California Vehicle Code, to wit as follows:
Whenever local authorities enact local parking regulations and indicate
them by the use of paint upon curbs, the following colors only shall be
used, and the colors indicate as follows:
RED indicates no stopping, standing, or parking, whether the
vehicle is attended or unattended, except that a bus may stop in red zone
marked or signposted as bus loading zone.
YELLOW indicates stopping only for the purpose of loading or
unloading passengers or freight for such time as may be specified by
local ordinance.
. WHITE indicates stopping only for loading or unloading of
passengers for such time as may be specified by local ordinance for the
purpose of depositing mail in an adjacent mailbox.
GREEN indicates time limit parking specified by local ordinance.
Regulations indicated as above provided shall be effective upon such
days and during such hours or times as may be prescribed by local
ordinances.
r
No
t-
d"
39,5
A. RED CURB - Prohibition of Stopping, Standing, or Parking. No
shall stop, park, or leave standing any vehicle whether
attended or unattended, except when necessary to avoid conflict
with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a
peace officer or official traffic control device, on any
public street, public way, or highway within the City of
Beaumont, California, as prescribed in Section 22500 of
the California Vehicle Code except authorized emergency
vehicles or vehicles of the City of Beaumont, Department
of Public Works. No vehicle shall stop, park, or be left
standing in any location where the curb has been painted
RED at the following locations:
(1) Beginning 103 feet north of the north curb line of
Fifth Street, west side of California Avenue, and
continuing north for 25 feet.
(2) Beginning 100 feet west of the west curb line of
California Avenue, north side of Fifth Street, and
continuing west for 13 feet.
(3) Beginning 94 feet east of the east curb line of
Grace Avenue south side of Fifth Street and continuing east
for 13 feet.
(4) Beginning at the east curb line of Magnolia Avenue,
north side of Sixth Street, and continuing east for
86 feet.
(5) Beginning at the west curb line of Orange Avenue, north
side of Sixth Street, and continuing west for 22 feet.
(6) Beginning 20 feet ;' inches, east property line of a
portion of Lot 1, Block 10, Subdivision of Section 11,
Tract 35, Range 1 West as Recorded in Book 9, Page 109
Records of San Bernardino County, City of Beaumont,
Annexation No. 9, and more particularly described as
1265 East Sixth Street, Beaumont, California and
continuing east for 12 feet.
(7) Beginning 39 feet q inches west of the east property
line of the property described in subsection 6 hereof,
and continuing west for 6 feet.
(8) Beginning 47 feet north of Sixth Street on west curb -
line of Beaumont Avenue and continuing north for 7 feet.
(9) Beginning 334 feet south of the south line of Cougar
Way, west side of Cherry Avenue and continuing south for 68
feet.
(10) Beginning 180 feet north of the north curb line of Ninth
Street, east side of Beaumont Avenue and continuing
north for 22 feet.
(11) Beginning 224 feet north of the north curb line of Ninth
Street, east of Beaumont Avenue and continuing north for
46 feet.
(12) Beginning 292 feet north of the north curb line of ninth
Street, east side of Beaumont Avenue, and continuing
north for 5 feet.
(13) Beginning at the north curb line of Sixth Street, east
side of Magnolia Avenue, and continuing north for 49
feet 6 inches.
(14) Beginning 203 feet north of the north curb line of
Sixth Street, east side of Magnolia Avenue, and
continuing north for 30 feet.
B. YELLOW CURB - Loading zone only which shall establish
prime facie time limit of thirty (30) minutes, and then only
to load or unload passengers, or to make pick -up delivery of
goods and materials. The following is a list of locations for
YELLOW zones:
X86
(1) Starting at the existing No Parking Zone at the north
east corner of Sixth Street and Beaumont Avenue, and
continuing east for 87 feet 7 inches.
(2) Starting 12 feet north of the north curb line of Fifth
Street, east side of Grace Avenue and continuing north
for 22 feet.
(3) Starting 18 feet west of the west curb line of Palm
Avenue, north side of Seventh Street, and continuing
west for 321 feet.
(4) Starting 34 feet west of the west curb line of
Wellwood Avenue, north side of Seventh Street, and
continuing west for 213 feet.
(5) Starting 95 feet west of the west curb line of
Magnolia Avenue, north side of Sixth Street, and
continuing west for 26 feet.
(6) Starting at the east curb line of Sunnyslope Avenue,
south side of Cougar Way (Sixteenth Street) and
continuing east for 195 feet.
(7) Starting 25 feet south of the south curb line of
Twelfth Street, east side of Beaumont Avenue, and
continuing south for 32 feet.
(8) Starting 25 feet east of the east curb line of
Beaumont Avenue south side of Twelfth Street, and
continuing east for 34 feet.
(9) Beginning 89 feet east of the east curbline of
Magnolia Avenue, north side of Sixth Street, and
continuing for 145 feet east.
(10) Beginning 112 feet north of the north curb line of
Sixth Street, east side of Magnolia Avenue, and
continuing north for 91 feet.
(11) Beginning 233 feet north of the north curb line of
Sixth Street, east side of Magnolia Avenue, and cont-
inuing north for 203 feet.
C. WHITE CURB - Stopping only for loading or unloading of
passengers for such time as may be specified by ordinance or for
such time as may be specified by ordinance or for the purpose of
depositing mail in adjacent mailbox, except authorized emergency
vehicles or vehicles of the City of Beaumont, Department of
Public Works.
(1) Beginning 10 feet north of curb line of Seventh Street,
west side of Beaumont Avenue and continuing north for
61 feet.
(2) Starting 270 feet north of the north curb line of
Ninth Street east side of Beaumont Avenue, and cont-
uing north for 22 feet.
D. GREEN CURB - Time limit parking zone shall also be painted with
white letters establishing time limit for stopping, parking or
standing according to the limiting time painted thereon which
may be less than, but in no case shall exceed twenty (20)
minutes.
(1) Starting 34 feet north of the north curb line of
Fifth Street, east side of Grace Avenue, and cont-
inuing north for 65 feet.
(2) Starting 87 feet north of the north curb line of
Fifth Street, east side of California Avenue, and
continuing north for 21 feet.
aw
No
rr
3
(3) Starting 33 feet west of the west curb line of
California Avenue, North side of Fifth Street, and
continuing west for 69 feet.
(4) Beginning at curb line in front of 1265 East Sixth
Street andcontinuing east for 20 feet 7 inches.
E. ONE HOUR PARKING ZONE - Is hereby established between the
hours of :00 AM and 6:00 PM except Sundays and Holidays
for the below designated locations within the City of
Beaumont and are posted with signs as prescribed in
Section 22507 of the California Vehicle Code as follows:
(1) North side of Sixth Street between Magnolia and
Euclid Avenue, with the exception of the curb
markings as indicated in Part III, Section 13, B(1)
and Part III, Section 13, B(5), designated as
loading Zones.
(2) South side of Sixth Street between Beaumont and
Euclid Avenues.
(3) The east and west sides of Beaumont Avenue between
Fifth and Seventh Streets.
d'
C� F. NO PARKING DURING SCHOOL HOURS - signs to be posted on
C� Cherry Avenue as below indicated:
C7
(1) Starting 380 feet south of the south curb line
Cougar Way, west side of Cherry Avenue and
continuing south for 98 feet.
(2) Starting 546 feet south of the south curb line
Cougar Way, west side of Cherry Avenue and
continuing 316 feet.
G. NO- PARKING - Upon any crosswalk, in any street or alley
intersection or within three feet of any crosswalk, inter-
section or driveway or within fifteen feet of any adjacent
fire hydrant.
H. NO-PARKING-ALLEYS, - Parking in alleys is expressly prohib-
ited in the City of Beaumont. Alley is defined as any highway
having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width which is
primarily used for access to the rear or side entrance of
abutting property.
Section 14. Parallel Parking (Curb Parking): Parking of vehicles
the City of Beaumont, California, on any public street, public way or
highway shall be stopped or parked with the right hand wheels of such
vehicle parallel and within eighteen (18) inches of the right hand curb,
except that motorcycles shall be parked with at least one (1) wheel or
fender touching the right hand curb. Where no curbs or barriers bound
any roadway, right handparallel parkin; is required as prescribed by
Section 22502 of the California Vehicle Code.
Part IV. TRUCK ROUTES
Section 15. Truck Routes Established: The streets and parts of
streets within the City specified in the following are hereby declared
to be truck routes for use by commercial vehicles weighing more than
6,000 pounds, laden or unladen, and the Street Department is hereby
authorized and directed to so designate said streets and parts of
streets by appropriate signs at each end of the streets or portions
of the streets described in the following subsections, and at such
other locations as he may deem necessary or advisable in order to give
adequate notice specifying such streets or portions of streets as
truck routes.
® a
A. Sixth Street from East City Limits to West City Limits.
Be Beaumont Avenue from North City Limits to South City Limits.
C. Fourteenth Street from East City Limits to West City Limits.
D. California Avenue from Sixth Street to South City Limits.
E. Veile Street from Sixth Street to B Street.
F. Fifth Place from Edgar Avenue west to west end.
G. Fourth Street from California Avenue to West City Limits.
I. Fifth Street from Wellwood Avenue to Maple Avenue. aw
J. Wellwood Avenue from Sixth Street to Fifth Street.
K. Maple Avenue from Sixth Street to Fifth Street.
L. Orange Avenue from Sixth Street to Fifth Street.
M. Minnesota Avenue from B Street to south end.
N. B Street from Elm Avenue to Veile Street.
0. Cherry Avenue from Fourteenth Street to North City Limits.
(1) WEIGHT LIMIT - When the truck traffic thus estab-
lished are designated by appropriate signs, no person
shall drive, operate or park any commercial vehicle or
any vehicle exceeding a maximum gross weight limit of
6,000 pounds (3 tons) on any street other than upon
the streets or portions of streets thus established
as truck traffic routes.
(2) EXCEPTIONS - The provisions of this Section shall not
prohibit any commercial vehicles coming from -an
unrestricted street having ingress and egress by
direct route to and from such restricted streets when
necessary for the purpose of- making pickups or deliver-
ies of goods, wares or merchandise from or to any
building or structure located on such restricted
streets or for the purpose of delivering materials to
be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration,
remodeling or construction of any building or
structure upon such restricted street for which a
building permit has previously been issued therefor.
(a) passenger busses under the jurisdiction of the
Public Utilities Commission of the State.
(b) public and private school busses.
(c) any vehicle used by a municipality, public agency
or public utility while necessarily in use in the
construction, installation or repair of any
public utility or public way.
(d) emergency vehicles.
(e) totally unladen panel or pickup type of comm-
ercial vehicles of a rated capacity of less
than one and one -half tons when used for the r
personal transportation of the operator
thereof.
PART V. PENALTIES
Section 16. Infractions and Special Misdemeanors - as pres-
cribed in Section 42001 of the California Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolutions No.'s 1970 -7, 1971 -32 and
1972 -7 and all other resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby
repealed.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of �c ^ _ 1972.
Mayor of the City of Beaumont,
California
ATTEST:
City Clerk
p
•
A. Every person convicted of an infraction for violation of
this code or any local ordinance adopted pursuant to this
code, shall be punished upon first conviction by a fine
not exceeding Fifty Dollars ($50.00) and for a second
conviction within a period of one year by a fine not
__..
exceeding One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) and for a third,
or any subsequent conviction within a period of one year, by
a fine not exceeding Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($250.00).
B. Every person convicted of a misdemeanor violation except
where a different penalty is expressly provided in said
provisions, shall be punishable upon first conviction by a
fine not exceeding Fifty Dollars ($50.00) or by imprisonment
in the County Jail for not exceeding Five Days and for a
second conviction within a period of one year by a fine
not exceeding One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) or by imprison-
ment in the County Jail for not exceeding Ten Days, or
by both such fine and imprisonment, and for a third or any
subsequent conviction within. a period of one year, by a fine
not exceeding Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) or by imprison-
ment in the County Jail for not exceeding Six Months or by
both such fine and imprisonment.
Q
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said regulations govern-
ing the flow of traffic in the City of Beaumont be adopted by the City
Council of the City of Beaumont as hereinabove set forth in detail be,
and the same in hereby approved and adopted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolutions No.'s 1970 -7, 1971 -32 and
1972 -7 and all other resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby
repealed.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of �c ^ _ 1972.
Mayor of the City of Beaumont,
California
ATTEST:
City Clerk
p
•
390
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
Resolution No. 1972 -17 be passed and adopted this date as read in full.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower, and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Communication read from Police Dept. reference investigation concerning
CEDU Foundation request to solicit funds door -to -door. Was stated
that staff members would be doing the soliciting. Recommended by
Lt. Salinas that a permit be granted the CEDU Foundation to solicit
funds, further that each person who solicits should have an identi-
fication card issued and that each card be countersigned by the
Beaumont Police Dept., prior to soliciting.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa:
That the request of the CEDU Foundation for a no fee permit to
solicit funds door -to -door sometime in the month of August be
granted and that Identification cards be issued to those who will be
going door -to -door and that they will be countersigned by the
Beaumont Police Department.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Communication read from the March of Dimes reference Bike- a -thon
in the Beaumont Area, stating they felt this could be arranged
sometime during the coming year.
Communication read from the League of California Cities announcing
the 74m Annual Conference being held this year in Anaheim, California,
October 15 -18. Was stated that all councilmen plan to attend further
that since council attending the City Man4ger and City Clerk should attend.
Mayor Haskell suggested that as the council will be attending the
City should adopt a resolution to be sent to the league that they
should have special session for cities under 15,000 population.
City Attorney Berk requested council authority to attend the
National Institute of Municipal Law Officers Conference in
Honolulu this year during the month of October, since he had to rr
cancel out attendance at the spring conference.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa:
That the City Attorney be authorized to attend the National Inst. of
Municipal Law Officers Conference in Honolulu in October.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Mayor Haskell announced he would be absent from the next council
meeting.
Vera Currie, owner of Palm Avenue Market was presented requesting
information.
City Attorney Berk stated necessary revision of language reference the
Vending Machine Ordinance had to be made and that he notified the
newspaper not to publish the original, that a corrected copy was
submitted to them for publication.
Was announced there is to be a Manpower Planning Committee meeting
July 141 at the Massacre Canyon Inn in Gilman Hot Springs, Friday from
12 -1:30 P.M. Mayor Pro -Tem Rodeman to attend.
Date of next regular study session set for Friday, July 21st, at WAM
10:00 A.M.
There being no further business, the meeting was declared adjourned
following motion of Councilman Hightower.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Ila, 'd,
City Clerk
July 24, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 P.M. in the
City Council Chambers of the City Hall, July 241b, 1972 with Mayor
Pro -Tem Rodeman presiding.
Rev. Johnson of the First Christian Church, 701 Egan Ave., Beaumont gave
the Invocation.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilman present: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower
and Rodeman. Absent: Councilman Haskell.
The minutes of the meeting held July 10th, 1972 were approved as
received.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia:
that the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Rodeman.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Haskell.
The minutes of the Planning Commission meeting held July 13m were
noted and filed.
Request of City Manager Ward to purchase police vehicle for Traffic
Safety under the state contract was presented.
r�i
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa:
That the City Manager be authorized to purchase the new vehicle.
Q Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Rodeman.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Haskell.
Request of City Manager Ward to.confirm the appointment of Capt. Salinas
to position of Acting Chief of Police during the time that Chief
Richardson is on Sick Leave as ordered by his Doctor.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia:
That Capt. Salinas be appointed Acting (thief of Police at the same
rate of pay as Chief Richardson.
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Rodeman.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Haskell.
Request of City Manager to install street lights on American Avenue
and Xenia Avenue north of 6m Street. Cost to be $4.75 per month per
light,
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa:
That a street light be installed on American Avenue and a street light
be installed on Xenia Avenue north of 61b Street within the City Limits,
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Rodeman.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Haskell.
Reported by City Manager Ward that Mr. Nejedley had requested to be on
the Agenda if considered necessary to obtain sewer easements, however, the
easements were granted on Friday and it is not necessary to go through
condemnation.
Date of next regular study session to be held Friday, August 11% at
10:00 A.M. in the City Managers office.
Councilman Ochoa stated will not be here for the next regular council
meeting as he is going on vacation. Did not think he would be going
out of state.
City Attorney requested authority for the Mayor Pro -Tem to release
documents pertaining to the Anti -Trust suit concerning liquid asphalt.
3,92
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -18
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Beaumont
that:
SECTION 1. That the settlement of the suit filed on behalf
of the City of Beaumont against Edgington Oil Company, Western Liquid
Asphalt Cases, Master File No. 50173 RES, as set forth in the
Settlement Agreement dated , 1972, entered into on
behalf of the City of Beaumont by its counsel is hereby
authorized, approved and ratified.
Section 2. That W. L. Rodeman, Mayor Pro -Tem be and he is
hereby authorized to execute and deliver the Final Release approved
by its counsel (Exhibit C to the Settlement Agreement) and cause
the suit to be dismissed without prejudice, each party to bear its
own costs and attorneys' fees.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24t day of July, 1972.
Mayor Pro -Tem
ATTEST:
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -19
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Beaumont,
that:
Section 1.- That the settlement of the suit filed on behalf
of the City of Beaumont against Witco Chemical Corporation and
Robert L. Feldman, Western Liquid Asphalt Cases, Master File No.
50173 RES, as set forth in the Settlement Agreement dated ,
1972, entered into on behalf of the City of Beaumont by its counsel
is hereby authorized, approved and ratified.
Section 2. That W. L. Rodeman, Mayor Pro -Tem be and he is
hereby authorized to execute and deliver the Final Release approved
by its counsel (Exhibit C to the Settlement Agreement)and cause the
suit to be dismissed without prejudice, each party to bear its own
costs and attorneys' fees.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24t day of July, 1972.
ATTEST:
e
Ci *y Clerk
Mayor Pro -Tem
aw
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia:
That Resolutions 1972 -18 and 1972 -19 be passed and adopted this date
as read in full.
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Rodeman.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Haskell.
Was announced Budget session will be held Wednesday, July 260, at
8:00 A.M. in the City Managers' office.
City Attorney Berk stated he will be at the next regular council
meeting, however the Deputy City Attorney will be there.
Mr. Higgins asked about paving of Mass. Avenue south of 60 Street.
City recommended that dust oil be placed on the street until storm
drain installed, as this has to be done prior to paving said street.
Mr. Higgins stated at this time, he wished to commend the Police
Department.
Lyman Burhop asked when the Budget hearings will be held in the
evenings.
t- There being no further business, the meeting was declared adjourned
following motion of Councilman Ochoa.
Mayor Pro -Tem
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The Beaumont City Council met in special session at 7:30 P.M. in the
City Hall Council Chambers, August 2nd, 1972, with Mayor Haskell
presiding. Proper notice of said meeting was given to each Council
member, the press and any other interested party as required by law.
Roll call found the following Councilmen present: Councilman
Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell. Absent: Councilman
Ochoa.
Mayor Haskell proceeded to explain that this meeting was called
to adopt the 1972 -73 Budget and authorize the City Manager to go
to bid on the City's Group Hospital Insurance for the Employees'.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
that the 1972 -73 Budget be approved as ;submitted.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Ochoa.
City Manager Ward proceeded to explain that although it is not
required that the Group Hospital Insurance go to bid, however there
are 4 or 5 companies who wish to bid on same, it is his request that
he be authorized to call for bids. Bids to be submitted by 10:00 A.M.
August 28M.
39
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
\ the City Manager be authorized to draw up the specifications for Group Health
land Accident Insurance and to go to bid to be submitted by 10:00 .AM., August
281b, 1972 in the City Managers' office of the City Hall.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Ochoa.
There being no further business, that cgn be discussed at this meeting
it was declared to be adjourned.
L.
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Mae B. Goularte
City Clerk
as a '--
Mayor
The Beaumont City Council met in special session at 7:30 P.M. in the
City Hall Council Chambers, August 2nd, 1972, with Mayor Haskell presidi
Proper notice of said meeting was given to each Council member, the pre
and any - .other interested party as required by law.
Roll call found the following Councilmen present: Councilman Rodeman,
Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell. Absent: Councilman Ochoa.
Mayor Haskell proceeded to explain that this meeting was called to
adopt the 1972 -73 Budget and authorize the City Manager to go to bid on
the City's Group Hospital Insurance for the employees'.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
that the 1972 -73 Budget be approved as submitted.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Ochoa.
City Manager Ward proceeded to explain that although it is not
required that the Group Hospital Insurance go to bid, however there are
4 or 5 companies who wish to bid on same, it is his request that he be
authorized to call for bids. Bids to be submitted by 10:00 A.M. August 28 %.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the City Manager be authorized to draw up the ecifications for
Group Health and Accident Insurance and to go to bid be submitted
by 10:00 A.M., August 28t, 1972 in the City Managers' Office of the City
Hall.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Valdivis, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Ochoa.
There being no further business, that can be discussed at this mee
t was declared to be adjourned.
Albert Haskell
Mayor
ATTEST:
Mae B. Goularte
City Clerk
UM
t-
Q
August 14t, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 P.M. in
the City Council Chambers of the City Hall, August 14th, 1972, with
Mayor Haskell presiding.
Rev. 0. D.Johnson of the First Christian Church, 701 Egan Ave.,
Beaumont gave the Invocation.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilman present: Councilman Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower
and Haskell. Absent: Councilman Ochoa.
The Minutes of the meeting held July 24tb, 1972 and the special
meeting held August 2nd_, 1972 were approved as received.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Ochoa.
Planning Commission minutes of July 27t were presented for the
Councils' review were noted and filed.
Mr. Jim Celano of the Auto Club of Southern California was present
to present the Pedestrian Safety Award for the 121b consecutive
year with no pedestrian fatalities to the Beaumont Police Department.
Mr. Ward presented the recommendation of the City Engineer that Mass.
Avenue south of 6'" St. to the freeway be dust oiled at this time
because of the drainage problem and can be paved at a later date when
the, drainage culvert is installed. Estimated cost of dust oiling
$250.00 maximum.
Mr. Higgins from the pioneer Trailer Park on E. 6+h St. and Mass. Avenue
spoke, wanted to know why the street couldn't be paved at this time,
Mrs. Benita E. Fuehrer of the Pioneer Trailer Park spoke regarding
this street, stating it was a health hazard.
Mr. Higgins spoke again and felt that the street should be paved at this
time instead of oiling.
Mayor Haskell asked question reference black topping, curbs and storm
drain. Mayor Haskell asked further question regarding would the owners
be ready to put curbs and gutters at this time.
Mrs. Opal Smith, Pioneer Trailer Park, 1055 E. 6b St., spoke regarding
this street.
Ion Garrett, Pioneer Trailer Park stated she lives on alley side and
it is used just as much as the street, when cars drive over same, dust
flies all over.
Mayor Haskell asked if they think the oiling will help keep the dust
down.
Mrs. Garrett stated if they are going ahead with the street paving
later, the oiling would help.
City Manager Ward stated again that it is the recommendation of the
City Engineer to oil this street at this time.
Mayor Haskell suggested that all of the owners be contacted and see
what their feeling to get this work, curbs, etc., done before the oil
is placed.
39-55,
J J 6
Mayor Haskell again stated that the recommendation of the City Engineer
is to oil Mass. Avenue south of 60 Street at an estimated cost of $250.00.
Councilman Rodeman recommended the dust oiling be done at this time
and that the street could be paved next year.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That City Manager Ward's recommendation to dust oil Mass. Avenue
south of 6t Street be accepted at a cost of $250.00 and the alley be
patched.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Ochoa.
City Manaer Ward instructed to contact the owners on both sides of
the Street reference their willingness to go ahead with the rD
drainage structure and curbs and gutters.
City Manager Ward presented Final Subdivision Map for Jack Taylor,
property located on Palm Avenue north of 13% Street, shows 11 lots.
The City Engineer recommends the council approve the final map
subject to the bonds being posted. Subdivision complies with all
ordinances and the state map act and the City subdivision ordinance.
City Manager Ward also recommends the final map be approved
subject to the bonds being issued.
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -20
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT
ACCEPTING TRACT MAP #4621, SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH
CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT HEREBY RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS: to -wit:
PART 1: Tract Map #4621 is acceptable, in its final state
contingent upon completion of the improvements as indicated by
the City Engineer of the City of Beaumont.
A. Street plans to be completed and signed by City Engineer.
B. Subdivider to construct improvements or post a bond
guaranteeing to complete the improvements.
C. Final map completed and signed by owner, engineer and all
others required by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14tb day of August 1972.
✓/' - /
Leg
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I. Mae B. Goularte, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont, California
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1972 -20 was duly passed
and adopted at a special meeting of the City Council of Said City, held
on the 14tb day of August 1972.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the City of Beaumont this 141
day of August, 1972.
Mae B. Goularte, City Clerk
fi
ORDINANCE NO. 441
AN ORDINANCE OF THE `'CITY OF BEAUMONT FIXING
THE AMOUNT OF MONEY NECESSARY TO BE RAISED
BY TAXATION UPON THE TAXABLE PROPERTY IN THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1972-
1973.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS; to -wit:
SECTION 1. That the amount of money necessary to be raised
by taxation upon the taxable property in the City of Beaumont
exclusive of all sums to be raised to pay the bonded and interest
indebtedness of the City of Beaumont, for the General Fund as a
revenue to carry on the various departments of government of the
City of Beaumont for the fiscal year 11?72 -73 is hereby fixed at
$ 107,038.51 ;
And the amount to be raised to pay the Bonded and Interest
indebtedness of the City of Beaumont for the fiscal year 1972-73
is hereby fixed at $ 11,774.24 ;
And the amount to be raised for the Lighting Maintenance Fund
of the City of Beaumont for the fiscal year 1972 -73 is hereby fixed
at $ 30,697.45 ;
And the amount to be raised for the Public Parks and Recreation
Fund of the City of Beaumont for the fiscal year 1972 -?3 is hereby
fixed at $ 19,266.93 ;
And the amount to be raised for the Civil Defense Fund for the
City of Beaumont for the fiscal year 1972 -?3 is hereby fixed at
$ 5,351.93 ;
And the amount to be raised for the Storm Drain and Flood
Control Fund for the City of Beaumont for the fiscal year 1972-73
is hereby fixed at $ 18,196.55 ;
And the amount to be raised for the Planning Fund for the City
of Beaumont for the fiscal year 19 72 -73 is hereby fixed at
$ 20,337.32 ;
And the amount to be raised for the Public Employees Retirement
Fund for the City of Beaumont for the fiscal year 19 72 -73 is hereby
fixed at $ 41,745.02
SECTION 2. This Ordinance is hereby declared to be an urgency
Ordinance, and to be necessary for the immediate preservation of
the public peace, health and safety and the facts constituting its
urgency are hereby stated and declared to be as follows:
It is required by law that an ordinance be adopted fixing the
amount of money necessary to be raised by taxation upon the
taxable property in the City of Beaumont as a revenue to carry on
the various departments of the government of the City of Beaumont
and to pay its bonded and other indebtedness and expenses for the
fiscal year 1972 -73, and that no later than the last Tuesday in
August the rate of tax be fixed; and there will not be sufficient
time elapse between the time of the adoption of this Ordinance and
the last Tuesday in August of this year to have it in effect by
said last Tuesday in August of this year to enable its passage
otherwise than as an urgency ordinance and be in effect in order
x
to comply with the law with reference to the fixing of the rate
of taxes of said City of Beaumont for the fiscal year 1972 -73;
and if said rate is not fixed the City of Beaumont will be without
funds with which to operate its various departments of government,
and to pay its bonded and other indebtedness and expenses, upon
which depends the public health, peace and safety.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be published once in
the Daily Record - Gazette, a newspaper of general circulation in
the City of Beaumont, and it shall be in full force and effect
immediately upon its adoption.
ADOPTED this 14th day of August, 1972.
Mayo
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, Mae B. Goularte, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 441 was intro-
duced and read at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the
City of Beaumont, duly held on the 14t day of August, 1972, and that
the same was duly passed and adopted as an urgency ordinance by the
following vote:
AYES: Councilman Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
NOES: None.
ABSENT:Councilman Ochoa.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the City of Beaumont,
this 14m day of August, 1972.
(SEAL)
City Clerk, City of Beaumont
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That Ordinance No. 441 be passed and adopted this date as an urgency
ordinance.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Ochoa.
RESOLUTION NO. 1972- 21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, FIXING
THE TAX RATE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1972 -73.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, State of
For the GENERAL FUND the sum of $ 107,038.51 .
For the BOND AND INTEREST INDEBTEDNESS the sum of $ 11,774.24
For the LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND the sum of $ 30,697.45 .
For the PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATION FUND the sum of $ 19,266.93.
For the CIVIL DEFENSE FUND the sums of $ 5.351.93 .
For the STORM DRAIN AND FLOOD CONTROL FUND the sum of $ 18,196.55 .
For the PLANNING FUND the sum of $ 20,337.32 .
For the PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND the sum of $ 41,745.02
SECTION 1. That the rate of taxes, which said taxes are to be
raised by taxation on the taxable property in the City of Beaumont
as a revenue in the various departments of government of the City
of Beaumont for the fiscal year 1972 -73 using as a basis the value
of taxable property of the City of Beaumont as assessed by the
County Assessor of the County of Riverside, as the same has been
equalized and so returned by the County of Riverside, as required
by law, be and the same is hereby fixed. as follows, to -wit:
FOR THE GENERAL FUND $ 1.00 upon each one hundred dollars of
such taxable property;
FOR THE BOND AND INTEREST FUND $ .11 upon each one hundred
dollars of such taxable property;
FOR THE LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND $1.00 upon each one hundred
dollars of such taxable real estate, exclusive of improvement;
California, did before the second Monday in August, 1972, in
compliance with law, transmit to the City Council of the City of
Beaumont, California, a statement in writing showing the total value
of all taxable property within the City of Beaumont duly
ascertained from the assessment books of said County of Riverside for
-•
the fiscal year 1972 -73 as equalized and corrected by the Board
.-�
of Supervisors of the County of Riverside; and
Q
WHEREAS, the City Council of said City of Beaumont did on the
14b day of August, 1972 and prior to the adoption of this Resolution
duly pass and adopt an Ordinance of the City of Beaumont fixing
thereby and therein the amount of money to be raised by taxation
upon the taxable property in the City of Beaumont, as a revenue to
carry on the various departments of the government of the said City
of Beaumont for the fiscal year 1972 -7 -2, as follows:
For the GENERAL FUND the sum of $ 107,038.51 .
For the BOND AND INTEREST INDEBTEDNESS the sum of $ 11,774.24
For the LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND the sum of $ 30,697.45 .
For the PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATION FUND the sum of $ 19,266.93.
For the CIVIL DEFENSE FUND the sums of $ 5.351.93 .
For the STORM DRAIN AND FLOOD CONTROL FUND the sum of $ 18,196.55 .
For the PLANNING FUND the sum of $ 20,337.32 .
For the PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND the sum of $ 41,745.02
SECTION 1. That the rate of taxes, which said taxes are to be
raised by taxation on the taxable property in the City of Beaumont
as a revenue in the various departments of government of the City
of Beaumont for the fiscal year 1972 -73 using as a basis the value
of taxable property of the City of Beaumont as assessed by the
County Assessor of the County of Riverside, as the same has been
equalized and so returned by the County of Riverside, as required
by law, be and the same is hereby fixed. as follows, to -wit:
FOR THE GENERAL FUND $ 1.00 upon each one hundred dollars of
such taxable property;
FOR THE BOND AND INTEREST FUND $ .11 upon each one hundred
dollars of such taxable property;
FOR THE LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND $1.00 upon each one hundred
dollars of such taxable real estate, exclusive of improvement;
40.0
FOR THE PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATION FUND $ .18 upon each
one hundred dollars of such taxable property;
FOR CIVIL DEFENSE FUND $ .05 upon each one hundred dollars
of such eaxable property;
FOR STORM DRAIN AND FLOOD CONTROL FUND $ .17 upon each one
hundred dollars of such taxable property;
FOR PLANNING FUND $ .19 upon each one hundred dollars of
such taxable property;
FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND $__.32_ upon each one
hundred dollars of such taxable property.
SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall transmit to the County
Auditor of the County of Riverside, California, a statement of the
rates herein fixed.
ADOPTED this 14th day of August, 1972.
i
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, Mae B. Goularte, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont, do
hereby certify that the forgoing Resolution No. 1972 -21 was duly
read and adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the
City of Beaumont held on the 14t day of August, 1972, by the
following vote:
AYES: Councilman Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilman Ochoa.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the City of Beaumont,
this 14b day of August, 1972,
(SEAL)
City Clerk, City of'Beaumont
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That Resolution No. 1972 -21 be passed and adopted this date as read
in full.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Ochoa.
FOLLOWS:
RESOLUTION N0. 1972 - 22
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT ACCEPTING GRANT DEED.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT DOES RESOLVE AS
That that certain GRANT DEED dated August 11, 19 72,
from Carl E. Mellor
to CITY OF BEAUMONT, conveying that certain real property situate
in the City of Beaumont, County of Riverside, State of California,
described as follows, to -wit:
t- The Easterly 77.4 feet of the Southerly 140 feet
*"4 of the West half of Lot 2 in Block 36, of the City
of Beaumont as shown by the Amended Map of the
Town, now City, of Beaumont, recorded in Book 6,
Q pages 16 and 17 of Maps, records of San Bernardino
County, California
EXCEPTING the West 60 feet thereof.
be and it is hereby accepted and directed to be recorded.
ADOPTED this 14th DAY OF —August 19 2 •
Mayor,of the City of Beaumont.
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Beaumont
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, Mae B. Goularte City Clerk of the City of Beaumont,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.1972 -22
was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of said
City, duly held on the 14% day of August 19 72 ,
by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
NOES: Councilmen None.
Absent: Councilman Ochoa.
Dated August 14, 1972
City Clerk of the City of Beaumont
(SEAL)
40
4 02
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 - 23
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT ACCEPTING GRANT DEED.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT DOES RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
That that certain GRANT DEED dated August 11, 199
from Carl E. Mellor
to CITY OF BEAUMONT, conveying that certain real property situate
in the City of Beaumont, County of Riverside, State of California,
described as follows, to -wit:
The West one -half (1/2) of Lot 1, Block 36 of
Town of Beaumont, as per Amended Map thereof,
recorded in Book 6, pages 16 and 17, records
of San Bernardino County.
EXCEPTING the West 160.00 feet thereof.
be and it is hereby accepted and directed to be recorded.
ADOPTED this
ATTEST:
14tb
day of August 19_72 .
Mayor of the City of Beaumont.
�Wa,e A62_, ,4t:/�
City Clerk of the City of Beaumon+
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, Mae B. Goularte City Clerk of the City of Beaumont,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1972 -23
was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of said
City, duly held on the 14% day of August 19 72 ,
by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Rodeman,
NOES: Councilmen None.
ABSENT: Councilman Ochoa.
Dated August 14, 1972
(SEAL)
Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
City Clerk of the City of Beaumont
ftw
um
1W
t-
Q
L7
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -24
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT ACCEPTING GRANT DEED.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT DOES RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
That that certain GRANT DEED dated August 11 19 72
from William C. and Gusta Hannemann. Man and Wife
to CITY OF BEAUMONT, conveying that certain real property situate
in the City of Beaumont, County of Riverside, State of California,
described as follows, to -wit:
The North 100 feet of the Northwest one - fourth
of Lot 29 in Block 36 of the City of Beaumont,
as shown on Amended Map of said City recorded
in Book 69 Pages 16/17 of Maps, Records of San
Bernardino County, California
EXCEPTING THE WEST 160.00 thereof.
be and it is hereby accepted and directed to be recorded.
ADOPTED this 14th
ATTEST:
day of August 19_Z2
Mayor of the City of Beaumont.
City Clerk of the City of Beaumont
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, Mae B. Goularte City Clerk of the City of Beaumont,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.1972 -24
was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of said
City, duly held on the 14sb day of August 19 72 ,
by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Rodeman,
NOES: Councilmen None.
ABSENT: Councilman Ochoa.
Dated August 14, 1972
(SEAL)
Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
City Clerk of the City of Beaumont
4 CJ, .
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That Resolution No. 1972 -22, 1972 -23, and 1972 -24 be passed and
adopted this date.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Ochoa.
Mr. Weiss was present to request business license, nature of the
business is marketing ideas, different types of ideas. His home
address is 878 Penn. Avenue.
Capt. Salinas stated following the background check which was made,
there is nothing derogatory.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: wo
That the request of Mr. Weiss for a business license be granted at
the minimum fee of $24.00 subject to Mr. Weiss getting a Post Office
Box.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Ochoa.
Request of Howard Ambulance Service in Redlands for a business
license to operate in Beaumont was presented. Mr. Osborn was
present representing Howard Ambulance Service.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia:
That the request for a business license be granted Howard Ambulance
since they have provided the certificate of insurance as required.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Ochoa.
Announcement of League of Calif. Cities Citrus Belt meeting to be
held in Victorville, August 26t, 1972 was read. Councilman
Rodeman and Hightower indicated they would attend.
Announcement of Manpower Planning Association meeting being held
August 17t at the San Bernardino Convention Center was read.
Councilman Rodeman indicated he would attend.
Communication read from Melvin Ellison reference transportation for
Senior Citizens. City Manager Ward to write to Mr. Ellison.
Communication read from League to name voting delegate and
alternate for the Anaheim convention.
Councilman Valdivia made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the Mayor be designated the voting delegate and the Mayor Pro -
Tem be designated the alternate delegate.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Ochoa.
Council at this time adjourned to personnel session at 9:35 P.M.,
meeting reconvened at 9:58 P.M. no action to be taken.
Date of next regular study session set for Friday, August 25u at
10 :00 A.M. in the City Managers' Office.
There being no further business, the meeting was declared to be
adjourned.
Mayor-
ATTEST:
,`% — ,
City Clerk
August 28, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 P.M. in
the City Council Chambers of the City Hall, August 28t, 1972, with
Mayor Haskell presiding.
Chuck Miller of the Assembly of God Church gave the Invocation.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found
the following Councilmen present: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa,
Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell. Absent: None.
The Minutes of the regular meeting held A #gust 141h, 1972 were
approved as received.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman
Hightower: That the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None,
The Planning Commission minutes of August 2nd, 1972 were noted
and filed.
Claim for damages was presented by Mrs. C. L. Matteson stating she
{' had fallen injuring her right leg on a raised section of City
* sidewalk.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman
Q Hightower: That the claim as submitted by Mrs. Matteson be denied
and turned over to the City's insurance carrier.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Proposed resolution was presented for council consideration to
claim funds under transportation Act of 1971 (SB325).
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -25
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, SIGNIFYING ITS INTENTION
TO SUBMIT A CLAIM FOR FUNDS UNDER THE TRANS-
PORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1971 AND AUTHORIZ-
ING THE CITY MANAGER TO COMPLETE ALL DOCUMENTS
TO SUPPORT CLAIMS FOR FUNDS.
WHEREAS, a State Program for local transportation improve-
ment funds known as the Transportation Development Act of 1971,
Chapter 1400, Statutes 1971 (SB 325 197) is being implemented in
Riverside County under the review of the Southern California
Association of Governments; and
WHEREAS, the Riverside County allocation has been apportioned
to provide local transportation funds to the City of Beaumont for
fiscal year 1972 -73 in the amount of $32,196.00; and
WHEREAS, the City of Beaumont has substantial need for these
funds in construction improvements of local city streets;
NOW,, THEREFORE, -.BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Beaumont will
actively participate in the program, and requests, in accordance
with Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971, and applicable Rules and
Regulations, the payment of funds by the Riverside County Auditor
with approval by the Southern California Association of Govern-
ments;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council, City of Beaumont,
authorizes the City Manager to act as representative for the City
in completing all documents in support of claims for funds.
ADOPTED this 281b day of August, 1972.
IQ
ATTEST: r
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, Mae B. Goularte, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont,
California hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1972-
25 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City
Council of said City, held on the 28th day of August, 1972, by
the following votes:
AYES: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the City of Beaumont,
this 280 day of August, 1972.
(SEAL)
Mae B. Goularte, City Clerk "100
t-
d^
Q
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That Resolution No. 1972 -25 be passed and adopted this date as
read in full.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Councilman Rodeman announced meeting of SCAG - Coastline Conference
to be held September 13b and 14m in Long Beach, program covers
Federal Grants, suggested that the City should be represented at
this conference. Advance Registration per person for the two days
is $20.00. Reservations ate to be made for three, City Manager
Ward, Mayor Haskell and Mayor Pro -Tem Rodeman, to be in by
September ft.
Request was presented reference proposed Resolution concerning Peace
Officer Selection and Training for the Fire Department.
Chief Diebner of the Fire Department commented on this and
recommended it be approved.
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -26
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF BEAUMONT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING
SPECIALIZED PEACE OFFICER SELECTION AND
TRAINING.
The City Council of the City of Beaumont does hereby resolve
as follows:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Beaumont
declares that it desires to participate in the Specialized Law
Enforement Certificate Program for the purpose of maintaining
and improving high standards for the selection and training of
specialized peace officers employed by the District Attorney,
Marshal of the Municipal Court, or other depar tments of the City
of Beaumont in accordance with the California Commission on Peace
Officer Standards and Training requirements.
Section 2. That the Commission and its representatives may
make such inquiries as deemed appropriate by the Commission to
ascertain that the Beaumont Fire Department, Arson Division
maintains selection and training standards for its specialized
peace officers that conform with Chapter I, Title 4, Part 4 of the
California Penal Code.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28tb day of A st, 1972.
Mayor
ATTEST:
i�� >y ✓� /�C- �1T -G�iS�
City Clerk
40
4U$
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, Mae B. Goularte, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont,
California hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.
1972 -26 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the
City Council of Said City, held on the 28tb day of August, 1972,
by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None,
Absent: None.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the City of Beaumont,
this 280 day of August, 1972.
(SEAL)
Mae B. Goularte, City Clerk
wo
No
No
409
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That Resolution No. 1972 -26 be passed and adopted this date.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
The consideration of unit bids on the health and accident insurance
for the employees was deferred to the next regular council meeting,
due to request of three of the insurance companies.
City Manager Ward stated Mr. Smith of Monarch Development requested
an extension of time reference Annex. #1972 -18 and that this matter
be tabled to the next regular council meeting. Extension was
approved, this matter to be held over to September 11tb, 1972.
City Manager Ward requested consideration of state contract bid on
a Fire Pumper, a new 19250 gallon Van Pelt Pumper. Would not be
available for a year and a half, however, if the City wants to
accept bid must be done at this time. Was stated that there is
a cancellation clause in that the city could cancel contract at the
end of 6 months.
Mr. Lawrence of the Van Pelt Company stated he understands this and
that he concurs with the 6 months cancellation clause being included
.-� in the Purchase Order as stated by the City Manager.
City Manager Ward recommended the City accept this bid subject to
the cancellation clause.
Q
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia:
That the City Attorney be instructed to draw up the necessary lease -
purchase papers on the purchase of a Van Pelt Fire Pumper and that
the City Clerk and the City Manager be authorized to enter into
a contract for the lease - purchase of this Van Pelt subject to
a six (6) months cancellation clause in the agreement.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Request of Chamber of Commerce reference proposed improvements on
Highway 60, 79 and Interstate 10 was read.
Recommendations were as follows:
Highway 60
1. Expand to eight lane expressway.
2. Provide overpass at each end of Western Knolls Avenue.
3. Signing of Highway 60 on 1 -10 shields.
Highway 79 - from I - 10 to Highway 74
1. Install passing lanes.
2. Install four lanes within the next 10 years.
3. Install overpass over Southern Padific Railroad Tracksq
4th Street to approximately 2nd Street on Beaumont Avenue.
I -10
1. Install westbound on ramp and also eastbound off ramp at
Pennsylvania Avenue.
Grade Separation at Penn. Avenue and Railroad was mentioned.
Councilman Hightower asked about access roads from Third Street.
Councilman Rodeman recommended access roads from Third St. to
Beaumont Avenue be included in the resolution.
410
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -27
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE
STATE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS TO
HIGHWAY 60, HIGHWAY ?9 AND INTERSTATE 10.
WHEREAS: The City Council of the City of Beaumont,
California is desirous of improving the flow of traffic through the
San Gorgonio Pass and is vitally concerned with traffic safety
of the local residents and transient vehicle operators.
The City Council of the City of Beaumont recommends the following
improvements:
1. Highway 60
a. Be expanded to a six lane Freeway from 395 to the
Junction of Interstate 10 at the Veile Street off
ramp in the City of Beaumont.
b. That an overpass be provided at the termination of
Western Knolls Avenue in the City of Beaumont.
c. Addition of Highway 60 signs to Interstate 10
shields throughout the San Gorgonio Pass Area.
2. Highway 79 from Interstate 10 to Highway 74,
a.- Install passing lanes.
b. Install four lanes within the next ten years.
c. Install overpass at the Junction of 79 and the
Southern Pacific Railway Junction, providing acess
roads from Third to First Streets on each side of
Beaumont Avenue within the City Limits of Beaumont.
3. Interstate 10
a. Install westbound on ramp and east bound off ramp at
the Junction of Interstate 10 and Penn Avenue,
within the City Limits of the City of Beaumont.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28% day of August, 1972.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, Mae B. Goularte, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont, Calif.-
ornia hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1972 -27 was
duly passed and adapted at a regular meeting of the City Council of
said City, held on the 28M day of August, 1972, by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the City of Beaumont,
this 28b day of August, 1972,
(SEAL)
Mae B. Goularte, City Clerk
r
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That Resolution 1972 -27 be passed and adopted this date, with the
two additions mentioned above.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Request of Chamber of Commerce for no fee permits to hold Flea
Markets twice annually, May and October and that they be renewable
annually. City Manager Ward stated the Chamber does have an "E"
number from the State Board of Equalization.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the request of the Chamber of Commerce for no fee permit to
hold Flea Markets twice annually, May and October, be approved and
that they be renewable annually.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Communication read from City Manager Ward to the Mayor of San
Jacinto reference the naming of Mayor Pro -Tem Rodeman as the
voting delegate for the Manpower Area Planning Council.
t- Communication read from the League of Cities reference under- ground
V-0 utilities, recommending utility companies paying entire cost. City
Q
Manager Ward recommended support of the bill pertaining to this.
City Manager Ward to write letter to the League that the council
is in support of the utility companies to pay entire cost of under -
grounding the utilities, which includes the customer service
connection.
Communication from the Public Utilities Commission reference
establishing list of grade crossings. Stated that a copy of the
Resolution to the Division of Highways to be sent to the Public
Utilities Commission.
Communication read from the City of Torrance reference resolution
to the League Convention concefning Utility Towers on Residential
streets. Following a discussion among the council it was recommended
that the following resolution be sent to the League and a copy to
the City of Torrance.
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 - 28
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT SUPPORTING THE CITY OF TORRANCE IN
PROTESTING THE ERECTION OF MASSIVE 100 FOOT
STEEL TRANSMISSION TOWERS ON RESIDENTIAL STREETS
BY THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY AND
OBJECTING TO THE DECISION OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES
COMMISSION THAT SUCH RESIDENTIAL STREETS ARE
APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS THEREFOR
WHEREAS, the Southern California Edison Company has erected
massive one hundred foot steel towers along certain narrow
residential streets in the City of Torrance; and
WHEREAS, said towers will be utilized to transmit two-
- hundred twenty thousant (220,000) volts of electricity thirteen
miles distant and will not serve the City of Torrance; and
WHEREAS, such towers and wires are so high, massive,
unsightly and aesthetically incompatible with their surroundings
so as to be repulsive to the sensibilities and senses of
proportions of reasonable men; and
412
WHEREAS, said towers have
Edirson's franchise without a penny
homeowners, which construction is
state of California; and
been constructed in surcharge of
of compensation being paid to affected
a matter of first instance in the
WHEREAS, the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles has
previously issued a temporary restraining order and preliminary
injunction barring Edison from further construction of said poles and wires
in the City of Torrance, which action has been prosecuted by the City
Torrance and the Attorney General of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, despite said decision of the Superior Court, the
State Public Utilities Commission has found that residential areas
are appropriate locations for such massive and unsightly facilities;
and
WHEREAS, such finding is contrary to the recommendations of its
own staff and to the opinion of every environmental expert who
testified before the Public Utilities Commission on this matter; and
WHEREAS, if the Public Utilities Commission decision is
allowed to stand, there is nothing to prevent any utility from
erecting similar massive and unsightly towers upon any street in
any other city in the State of California; and
WHEREAS, it is in the advised opinion of this Council that the
Public Utilities Commission has ignored its statutory duty to
regulate the utilities and protect the citizens of the State in the
matter ; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the lack of concern for the public, evidenced by the
Public Utilities Commission in its hearing and findings on Edison's
construction of said one hundred foot steel towers and attendant
220,000 volt transmission lines along residential streets in the City
of Torrance, is hereby formally and vigorously protested;
2. That the League of California Cities and each of its
members be encouraged to protest the insensibility exemplified by
Edison and the Public Utilities Commission in this matter and are
hereby requested to profer such assistance as it can in the appeal
of this untenable and far reaching decision:
no
r
3. That copies of this resolution be sent to the following:
The Honorable Ronald Reagan, Governor of the State of California:
Vernon L. Sturgeon, President, Public Utilities Commission: the
League of California Cities and each of its members.
Introduced, approved and adopted this 281b day of
August , 1972.
Mayor the City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk
zL
r-' STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
QCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, MAE B. GOULARTE, City Clergy; of the City of Beaumont, California
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly introduced,
and approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Beaumont at a
regular meeting of said Council held on the 281b day of August ,
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: e0UKeILMKK; None.
IC14?.
City Clerk of the City of Beaumont
(SEAL)
4T3
`414
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That Resolution No. 1972 -28 be passed and adopted this date.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Date of the next regular study session set for September 7t, at
4 :00 P.M.
Councilman Rodeman reported on the Citrus Belt Division of the League
of Calif. Cities meeting held in Victorville.
There being no further business, the meeting was declared to be
adjourned, following motion of Councilman Rodeman.
Mayor
ATTEST:
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 P.M. in
the City Council Chambers of the City Hall, Sept. 110, 1972, with
Mayor Haskell presiding.
A moment of Silent Prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilmen present: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia,
Hightower and Haskell. Absent: None.
The Minutes of the regular meeting held August 281, 1972 were
approved after the following correction was made:
The second paragraph on page 4 should have read as follows:
"Councilman Rodeman recommended access roads from Third St. to
First Street on both sides of Beaumont Avenuo be included in the
resolution."
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
The Planning Commission minutes of meeting held August 24b, 1972
were noted and filed following a discussion on a permanent -conditional
use permit granted for the Catholic Youth Hall.
Mayor Haskell suggested the Conditional Use Permit be pulled for
review. The City Manager to check into the Ordinance pertaining
to conditional use permits.
City Manager Ward presented recommendation for hours of use for the
City Parks, was stated the hours of use are not provided in the new
park ordinance. This matter referred to the Parks committee for
their recommendation to report back at ghe next regular council
meeting.
wo
am
am
Request of City Manager reference appointment of the Chief of Police
was presented. Reported that Chief or ex -Chief Richardson has
stated he does not wish to return and has filed for retirement.
Mr. Ward further recommended that Capt. William E. Salinas be
appointed Chief of Police as of this date.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa:
That Capt. W. E. Salinas be appointed Chief of Police as of this
date.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Mayor Haskell at this time presented the Police Chief's badge to the
new Chief.
Chief Salinas at this time publicly thanked the council for the
confidence shown in him by this appointment.
Oscar Leeb spoke regarding the appointment of Chief Salinas and
said he is pleased and happy with the appointment.
City Manager Ward presented request for resolution authorizing
for the borrowing of funds in the amount of $50,000.00 to pay back
on or before June 30, 1973 for cash flow purposes.
C�
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -29
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF NEGOTIABLE NOTES IN THE AMOUNT
OF $50,000.00.
WHEREAS, funds are needed to meet the immediate requirements
of the City of Beaumont, including but not limited to the payment
of current expenses, capital expenditures, and the discharge of any
obligation or indebtedness of said City; and
WHEREAS, the city may borrow for said purposes, such indebt-
edness to be represented by a note or notes issued to the lender
pursuant to Article 7.6, Chapter 4, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5,
of the Government Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, First Western Bank & Trust Company has offered to lend the
sum of $50,000.00 at an interest rate of 4 3/4% per annum, upon one
negotiable note to be payable on June 30, 1973, with interest to date of payment;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. This Council finds it is necesssry for the City to
issue negotiable note in the amount of $50,000.00 in order to meet the
immediate requirements of said city.
Section 2. The taxes, income, revenue, cash receipts and other
moneys to be received by said city during the current fiscal year are
estimated to be $753,380.07. The amount of the note hereby authorized
to be issued, together with other notes outstanding, if any, does not
exceed 85% of said moneys.
Section 3. Said note shall be dated as of the date of delivery,
shall be one in number, shall be in the denomination of $50,000.009
shall be paid on June 30,1973, and shall bear interest at the rate of
4 3/k% per annum, payable at the maturity thereof.
Section 4. Both the principal of and the interest on said note
shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America at the
Office of the City Treasurer, Beaumont, California.
'416
Section 5. Said note shall be payable from the taxes, income,
revenue, cash receipts and other moneys to be received during the
fiscal year 1972 -1973,
said moneys being hereby pledged to repay said note; provided
however, that if said moneys or any portion thereof when received by the
city will be encumbered for a special purpose other then the
repayment of said note, then pursuant to Section 53856 of the
Government Code and equivalent amount of the proceeds of said note shall
be set aside for and used for said special purpose; and provided,
further, that said note with interest thereon may be paid from any
other moneys of the City lawfully available therefor.
Section 6. Said note shall be signed by the Mayor and the
City Treasurer, and countersigned by the City Clerk, and shall be in No
substantially the following form;
CITY OF BEAUMONT
NEGOTIABLE NOTE
No. 1
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the City of Beaumont, California a municipal
corporation, promise to pay to First Western Bank & Trust Company on
order, on June 30, 1973, the Sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars (50,000.00)
with interest thereon, payable at the maturity thereof, at the rate of
4 3/4% per annum from the date hereof. Both principal and interest are
payable in lawful money of the United States of America at the Office
of the City Treasurer in the City of Beaumont, State of California.
The principal of the interest on this note are payable from
taxes, income, revenue, cash receipts and other moneys of the City of
Beaumont to be received during the fiscal year 1972 -1973, said moneys
being pledged for the payment of this note and the interest hereon.
Notwithstanding said pledge, this note is a general obligatioh of the
City and, to the extent not paid from said moneys, shall be paid with
interest thereon from any other moneys of the City available therefor.
NNW
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED AND DECLARED, that all acts,
conditions and things required by law to exist, happen and be
performed precedent to and in the issuance of this note have existed,
happened and been performed in due time, form and manner as required
by law, and that the amount of this note, together with all other
indebtedness of the City, does not exceed any debt limit perscribed by
the laws or Constitution of the State of California.-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said City of Beaumont has caused this
note to be signed by the Mayor and the City Treasurer of said City
and countersigned by the City Clerk of said City, and has caused this
note to be dated this 11b day of September, 1972-
0 00�
Mayor of the City of Beaumont
(SEAL)
i
COUNTERSIGNED:
r'
ty Treasurer of the C' y f Beal nont
City Clerk of the City of Beaumont
t-
r-4
d"'
Q
Q
Section 7. This City Council hereby finds and determines th4t
it is necessary and desirable that the City borrow from First Western
Bank & Trust Company, the sum of $30,000.00 such indebtedness to be re-
presented by the negotiable note authorized hereby. The Mayor and
the City Treasurer are authorized to countersign said note and to
date and seal said note on the date of delivery thereof. Said note
shall be issued according to the terms and substantially in the
form provided in this resolution.
Section 8. This resolution shall constitute acceptance of
the offer of First Western Bank & Trust Company above referred to.
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this llm day of September, 19 72.
Mayor of the Ci y of Beaumont
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Beaumont
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
417
I, Mae B. Goularte, City Clerk: of the City of Beaumont, California,
do Hereby Certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of said City and was approved by this Mayor of said City at a
regular meeting of said City Council, held on the 11th day of September, 1972.
AYES: , Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Haskell and Hightower.
NOES: hone.
ABSENT :None.
(SEAL)
%?_ l • . /�t_ed 111
City Clerk of the City of Beaumont
California
418 1
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That Resolution No. 1972 -29 be passed and adopted and the Mayor,
City Clerk and City Treasurer be authorized to sign said note on
behalf of the City, in the amount of $50,000.00 to be paid.back
on or before June 30, 1973.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Announcement of the Mayors and Councilman's Meeting to be held
Wednesday, Sept. 13+x, 7 :00 P.M. at the Rusty Lantern.
Was recommended by the Mayor that Sgt. Robertson attend repre-
senting Beaumont Civil Defense. Chief Salinas stated Sgt.
Robertson is on vacation and cannot go.
Communication read from the City of Ridgecrest reference proposed
street lighting increase by the Southern California Edison Company,
City Attorney Berk recommended letter be sent to City of Ridgecrest
offering moral support, however, informing them that the City at
this time is not in a position to offer financial support. City
Clerk instructed to write said letter.
Communication read from County Dept. of Development reference dinner
meeting to be held October 5b at the Highland Springs Resort at
7:00 P.M. Mayor Haskell and Mayor Pro -Tem Rodeman indicated they
would attend.
At this time claim for damages was presented on behalf of Patrick
Charles Kearn as a result of an accident which occurred at or near
the intersection of Michigan Avenue and Eighth Street on the 172 day
of July, 1972.
City Attorney Berk stated claim should be denied and referred to the
City's Insurance Carrier.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the claim presented on behalf of Patrick Charles Kearn be
denied and referred to the City's Insurance Carrier. MW
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower, and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Communication read from Mr. W. Craig Biddle, State Senator, reference
meeting with the council regarding future legislation.
City Manager Ward brought up utility companies chopping up of land
for right of way for extension of lines could something be done to
bring to Mr. Biddles attention.
Mayor Haskell recommended resolution being prepared and presented to
the League reference small cities concerning this matter and that a
meeting be set up with Mr. Biddle.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the City Manager contact Mr. Biddle and set up meeting with him
and the Councils of Beaumont and Banning and Mr. Barker from Banning.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Communication read reference dedication ceremonies being held
September 24, 11:00 A.M. at the Alice Judson Pecan Grove, 5500
Riverview Drive in Riverside, California, dedication is for Santa
Ana River Regional Park.
41 q
Councilman Rodeman reported on the meeting he attended Sept. 5 %,
of the Manpower Area Planning Council. Stated PEP would be
renewed, however under a different name and will be under the
Manpower Planning Council.
At this time, 8:41 P.M. the council adjourned to a personnel
session. Meeting reconvened at 9:04 P.M.
At this time, City Manager Ward read a letter of resignation by
Mae B. Goularte, City Clerk, stating she is resigning as City Clerk
effective September 15, 1972.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the Council ratify the action taken at the personnel session,
and as added by City Attorney Berk documentation to be as an
appendage to the minutes.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Mr. Weldon Blain asked whether the council has adopted an open
space plan and if not why not.
Mayor Haskell stated the City has not as yet adopted an open
space plan as the one the county was working on was not
satisfactory for the City. The City is, however, working on one
themselves if the County still does not come up with a
satisfactory plan.
Q Although the newspaper has stated the deadline was August 31st,
1972, 75% of the City's have not adopted an open space plan and
they do have until December to come up with a final plan.
Date of next regular study session set for September 21st, a
Thursday at 4:00 P.M.
There being no further business, the meeting was declared adjourned
following motion of Councilman Rodeman.
Mayor
ATTEST:
city er
September 15l, 1372
The Beaumont City Council met in.a Special Session at 3:00 P.M.
in the City Manager's Office of the City Hall with Mayor Haskell
presiding. The meeting was called for the purpose of adopting
Resolution No. 1972 -30. The press and all interested parties
were notified of the Special Meeting as required by law.
Roll call found the following @ouncilmen present: Councilman
Haskell, Rodeman, Hightower, Valdivia and Ochoa.
420
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -30
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, SIGNIFYING ITS INTENTION
TO SUBMIT A CLAIM FOR FUNDS UNDER THE TRANS-
PORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1971 AND AUTHORIZ-
ING THE CITY MANAGER TO COMPLETE ALL DOCUMENTS
TO SUPPORT CLAIMS FOR FUNDS AND RESCINDING
RESOLUTION 19 72 -25.
WHEREAS, a State Program for local transportation improvement funds
known as the Transportation Development Act of 1971, Chapter 1400, Statutes
1971 (SB 325 197) is being implemented in Riverside County under the review
of the Southern California Association of Governments; and
WHEREAS, the Riverside County allocation has been apportioned to rr
provide local transportation funds to the City of Beaumont for fiscal year
1972 -73 in the amount of $26,489,00;
WHEREAS, the City of Beaumont has substantial need for these funds
in construction improvements of local city streets;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Beaumont will
actively participate in the program, and requests, in accordance with
Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971, and applicable Rules and Regulations,
the payment of funds by the Riverside County Auditor with approval by
the Southern California Association of Governments;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council, City of Beaumont,
authorizes the City Manager to act as representative for the City in
completing all documents in support of claims for funds.
ADOPTED this 150 day of SEPTEMBER, 1972.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, Mae B. Goularte, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont, California
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1972 -30 was duly passed
and adopted at a special meeting of the City Council of Said City, held
on the 151b day of September, 1972, by the following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the City of Beaumont this
151 day of September, 1972.
(SEAL)
�A/�
Mae B. Goularte, City Clerk
WAW
�i
Coucilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That Resolution No. 1972 -30 be passed and adopted this date.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Hightower., Valdivia, Ochoa, Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
There being no further business that can be discussed at this
Special Meeting, the meeting was declared adjourned.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Mae B. Goularte
City Clerk
Brenda Dallmeier
By Deputy City Clerk
L'a
Beaumont, California
September 25, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a :regular session at 7:30 P.M, in
the City Council Chambers of the City Hall, September 251h, 1972, with
Mayor Haskell presiding.
Mr. Bigby of the First Christian Church gave the Invocation.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilmen present: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia,
Hightower and Haskell. Absent: None.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
The Minutes of the regular meeting held September 11t, 1972 and
the Special Session Meeting held on September 15tb, 1972 were
approved as received.
The Planning Commission minutes of September 14u, 1972 were noted
and filed.
City Manager Ward reminded the Council of the League of California
Cities meeting in Anaheim on October 15+h, 1972 thru October 18+x,
1972. All Councilmen will be in attendance.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the City Council ratify the action of the Public Works Committee
on Chip Sealing of certain streets in Beaumont and authorizing
Riverside County to do the work. The portion of streets to be done
are as follows: Chestnut Avenue, Elm Avenue, Grace Avenue, Olive
Avenue, Third Street, Walnut Avenue, Wellwood Avenue, Orange Avenue,
and Eleventh Street.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower, and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
422
Mayor Haskell made a recommendation for the Public Works Committee
to meet on Friday 290, 1972 in the City Manager's Office to study
the Interim Plan Study of the City of Beaumont's Zone of Influence.
Local newspapers were notified of meeting.
Communication regarding a meeting on September 27th, 1972 at 10 :00 A.M.
in the Hall of Records, Room 13, Riverside on the Re- funding of the
PEP Program. Councilman Hightower, Rodeman, and City Manager to
attend.
Communication regarding a meeting with Mr. Biddle on September 28u,
1972 at the Security Bank Building in Riverside regarding
maintaining present utilities corridors throughout San Gorgonio
Pass Area. One Councilman and City Manager to attend.
Communication regarding Resolution 1972 -28 of the City of Beaumont
supporting the City of Torrance, had been received by the
Governor of the State of California, Governor Reagan.
Communication of adopting a Resolution concerning Coastal Zone
Conservation was brought up by the City Manager for discussion.
City Manager reminded the Council of the County Department of
Development dinner meeting on October 5th, 1972 at the Highland
Springs Resort at 6:30 P.M-
The City Council adjourned to an executive personnel session in the
City Manager's Office to discuss the position of City Clerk.
No decision was reached at this time and the City Manager was to
continue on taking applications.
Date of next regular Study Session set for October 6th, 1972 a
Thursday at 4 :00 P.M.
There being no further business, the meeting was declared
adjourned following motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by
Councilman Ochoa.
Mayor Albert Haskell
ATTEST:
Brenda Dallmeier
Deputy City Clerk
Acting Clerk
I
413
Beaumont, California
October 10, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a _regular session at 7:30 P.M. in
the City Council Chambers of the City Hall, October 10th, 1972 with
Mayor Haskell presiding.
A moment of Silent Prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilmen present: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia,
Hightower and Haskell. Absent: None.
The Minutes of the regular meeting held September 25m, 1972 were
approved after the following correction was made:
The eighth paragraph on page 1 should have listed two additional streets.
Councilman Rodeman recommended that Orange Avenue and Eleventh Street
should, be added to the list of Streets to be Chip Sealed.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
The Planning Commission minutes of meeting held September 28t, 1972
were noted and filed.
Mayor Haskell requested of City Manager Ward to contact Barbara McCollum
Q Executive Director of The National Foundation March of Dimes for a
meeting at a later date.
City Manager Ward presented request of Mr. Monte Montoya for a business
license to operate a sauna bath and massage parlor. At this time
City Manager Ward called upon Police Chief Salinas to give a report
of clearance by the Police Department. Which was a favorable report
from the C.I.I.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That a six months business license in compliance with all ordinances
be issued to Mr. Monte Montoya.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
City Manager Ward requested of City Council permission to purchase
a Compressor to service City Equipment at a cost of $525.00.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa:
That the City Manager Ward be granted Council permission to purchase
the Compressor at the Cost of $525.00.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
City of Manager Ward presented City Engineer Jim Dotson to display
tentative map for the Interim Plan Study. Minor correction by City
Council were so noted.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa:
That the City Engineer be instructed to complete the Documents and
Resolution in conformance with the approved map.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower, and Haskell.
Noes: None.
At this time 9 :03 P.M. the City Council adjourned to a personnel
session to discuss application for position of City Clerk. Meeting
reconvened at 10 :31 P.M.
42
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That the decision of the adjourned personnei.session concerning the
reappointment of the new City Clerk for the remaining term of the
former City Clerk Mae B. Goularte be made to Mr. Jay C. Conley.
Communication regarding request of the Beaumont Unified School
District that the City of Beaumont install a Street Light on
Magnolia Avenue in front of the administrative office. City Manager
stated that an existing pole was there and would be no difficulty
in putting a light in.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
Approving the installation of a Street Light on Magnolia Avenue
in front of the administrative office of the School District.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Communication regarding Title I Advisory Committee request the
permission of the City Council to use the utility building in Stewart
Park for the Community Clothes Closet.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
Granting the Title I Advisory Committee the use of the utility building
in Stewart Park with the City Council retaining the right to terminate
the use at anytime.
Communication regarding Mr. Lyman Burhop request of the City Council
for a Riverside Grand Jury Investigation of the loss or theft of
$395430. City Manager Ward was instructed by Council to further
investigate the case.
Communication City Manager Ward brought to the attention of the
City Attorney the trial date of Pope vs. City of Beaumont had been
continued from September 22m, 1972 to Friday October 27 %, 1972 at
10 :00 A.M. in the Justice Court in Beaumont.
Date of next regular study session set for October 19Lh, 1972 in the
City Manager's Office a_Thursday at 4:00 P.M.
There being no further business, Councilman Rodeman made a motion aw
that this meeting be adjourned to October 12 %, 1972 a Thursday
at 4:00 P.M. in the City Manager's Office for the purpose of
administering the oath of office for City Clerk.
ATTEST:
Brenda Dallmeier
Deputy City Clerk
Acting Clerk-Donna Nelson
L Mayo
1W
425'
Beaumont, California
October 12, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a Special Session at 4:00 P.M. in
the City Manager's Office of the City Hall with Mayor Haskell
presiding. Proper notice of said meeting was given to the press
and any other interested party as required by law.
Roll Call found the following Councilmen present: Councilman
Rodeman, Hightower, Ochoa and Haskell. Absent: Councilman Valdivia.
Mayor Haskell proceeded to explain that this meeting was reconvened
from the regular City Council meeting held on October 10Lh, 1972
for the purpose of administering the oath of office for City Clerk
to the newly appointee Mr. J. C. Conley.
At this time Mayor Haskell read into the minutes Mr. J. C. Conley
letter of resignation from the Beaumont Planning Commission.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That Mr. J. C. Conley resignation from the Beaumont Planning
Commission be accepted into the records.
Mayor Haskell then asked Mr. J. C. Conley to please stand and he
then administered the oath of office for City Clerk to him.
Q There being no further business that can be discussed at this
Special Meeting, the Meeting was declared adjourned at 4:10 P.M.
Mayor
ATTEST
Deputy City Clerk
Beaumont, California
October 24, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 P.M. in
the City Council Chambers of the City Hall, October 24tb, 1972 with
Vice Mayor Walter Rodeman presiding until 7:45 P.M. when Mayor Haskell
arrived and presided over the remainder of the meeting.
A moment of silent prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilmen present: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia,
Hightower and at 7:45 P.M., Mayor Haskell.
Absent: None.
The minutes of the regular meeting held October 10Lh, 1972 were approved
as read.
Councilman Hightower made a motion at 7:40 P.M., seconded by Councilman
Valdivia, that the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilmen Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower.
Noes: None.
The Planning Commission minutes of the meeting held October 12Lh, 1972
were noted and filed.
:42 :6
The recommendation of City Engineer to accept deeds on the Nejedly
Project for the various easements and rights -of -way was tabled,
subject to an environmental impact report. A letter advising
Mr. Nejedly of Council's action was ordered written.
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Hightower,
the Planning Commission is appointed as an Environmental Impact Review
Board.
Ayes: Councilmen Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Haskell.
Noes: None.
A report on the Bike -A -Thou meeting with executive Director of
March of Dimes was given. Late Spring or Fall of 1973 was suggested.
Route and dates will be submitted to the March of Dimes for approval.
The City will sponsor this event. Mr. Doug Dickson will be contacted r
by committee from Council, Mr. Hightower and Mr. Ochoa, for entry
of the white fire truck in January parade.
The request of Mr. Joe W. Mills and Phillip A. Liptak for itinerant
salesmans license must be resubmitted with proper addresses of each
applicant. A letter was ordered written notifying them of Council's
decision.
City Manager Ward recommended an amendment to Business License
Ordinance #333. The request was tabled for study. Councilmen
Rodeman and Valdivia were appointed to review the ordinance.
Councilman Ochoa was appointed alternate.
Date of next regular study session set for November 9t, 1972 at
4:00 P.M., in the City Manager's Office.
There being no further business, Councilman Rodeman made a motion
that this meeting be adjourned. �..�
yor
ATTEST:
am
WNW
t..
d"
Q
Q
Beaumont, California
November 13, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a :regular session at 7:30 P.M., in the
City Council Chambers of the City Hall, November 13, 1972 with Mayor
Albert Haskell presiding.
A moment of silent prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilmen present: Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and
Hightower.
Absent: None.
The minutes of the regular meeting held October 24tb, 1972 were
approved as read.
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Hightower,
the City of Beaumont will pay the bills as audited.
Ayes: Councilmen Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and Hightower.
Noes: None.
The Planning Commission minutes of the meeting held October 26th and
November 92, 1972 were read and tabled for review on November 16+h,
1972 at 7:30 P.M., in Council Chambers.
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Ochoa, the
City will install four street lights on Western Knolls Avenue as
recommended by City Manager Ward. Lights were requested by
Mr. Dale Hamilton.
Ayes: Councilmen Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and Hightower.
Noes: None.
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Ochoa,
That Ordinance #442 pass its first reading by title only.
Ayes: Councilmen Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and Hightower.
Noes: None.
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Ochoa, the
City Council of Beaumont will accept the invitation from the
San Jacinto Chamber of Commerce to participate in the Christmas
Parade on Saturday, December 9t, 1G72. Mr. Ward will make
arrangements for transportation.
Ayes: Councilmen Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and Hightower.
Noes: None.
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Hightower,
the City of Beaumont will grant the Arthritis Foundation permission
to solicit contributions on February lst, 2nd and 3rd, 1973, with
approval from the Beaumont Police Department.
Ayes: Councilmen Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and Hightower.
Noes: None.
The following communications were read:
A letter from the Planning_Commission submitting one name for
consideration of appointment to-fill the vacancy on the Planning
Commission. Chairman Thompson verbally proposed the name of Mrs.Ethyl
Remy. Mr. Ward informed the Council of telephone communication with
Mr. Rost and Mr. Yoder regarding paving of Third Street from
Pennsylvania Avenue to Beaumont Avenue.
Mr. Ward was instructed by the Council to make a study of cost factors
and the possibility of County assistance with this project.
Date of next regular study session set for Friday, November 24th, 1972
at 4:00 P.M., in the City Managers office.
There being no further business, Mayor Haskell adjourned this meeting
to the Planning Commission Meeting November 16u, 1972, 8 :40 P..m.
a4yor
ATTEST:
i e
I t#
■
428
Beaumont, Calif.
November 16, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in an adjourned meeting with the
Planning Commission at 7:30 P.M., in the City Council Chambers of the
City Hall, November 16+h, 1972 with Mayor Haskell presiding.
The City Council portion of the meeting was called to order at 8:15 P.M.
Roll call found the following Councilmen present: Haskell, Valdivia and
Hightower.
Absent: Ochoa, Rodeman.
On motion of Councilman Haskell, seconded by Councilman Hightower, the
City of Beaumont will accept Resolution #1972 -8 as presented by the
Planning Commission.
Ayes: Hightower, Valdivia and Haskell.
Noes: None. am
On motion of Councilman Haskell, seconded by Councilman Hightower,
the City of Beaumont will ratify the action by the Planning
Commission to accept the Environmental Impact Report as presented by
Bar -Beau Mobil Home Park.
Ayes: Hightower, Valdivia and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Councilman Valdivia made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower
that Resolution #1972 -31 be adopted accepting the easements as
presented by James B. Thompson and Verna M. Thompson, Francis M. Dowling.Jr.,
Leighton R. Taylor, A. C. Nejedly, Shirley Nejedly, and Kaushansky and
Rinaldi. These easements include slope and drainage rights. Easements
will be forwarded to the City Engineer for recordation.
Ayes: Hightower, Valdivia and Haskell.
Noes: None.
On motion of Councilman Valdivia, seconded by Councilman Hightower, the
City will purchase the sound equipment and microphones for the use of
the City Council and the Planning Commission meetings at a total cost
of $675.00.
Ayes: Hightower, Valdivia and Haskell.
Noes: None.
The City Council portion of this meeting was adjourned at 9:40 P.M. aw
Maybf
ATTEST:
C erk
VW
429
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -31
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
AUTHORIZING CITY CLERK TO ACCEPT AND CONSENT TO TRANSFERS
OF INTERESTS IN OR EASEMENTS UPON REAL ESTATE CONVEYED
TO THE CITY OF BEAUMONT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES BY DEED OR
GRANT.
WHEREAS, it is necessary and convenient that from time to
time interests in or easements upon real estate be conveyed to the
city of Beaumont, California for public purposes by deed or grant in
order to enhance orderly growth and development, and
WHEREAS, the provisions of California Government Code Section
27281 requires, among other things, that transfers to political
corporations or governmental agencies of interest or easements upon
real estate for public purpose by deed or grant shall not be accepted
for recordation without the consent of the grantee evidenced by its
certificate or resolution of acceptance attached to or printed on
the deed or grant, and
WHEREAS, said California Government Code Section 27281
further provides that a political corporation or governmental agency
may by a general resolution authorize an officer or agent to accept
and consent to such deeds or grants,
Q NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
The City Clerk of the City of Beaumont be and hereby is
authorized to accept and consent to transfers of interests in and
easements upon real estate conveyed to the City of Beaumont for
public purposes pursuant to deed or grant.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that certain EASEMENT dated July 21,
1972 from James B. Thompson and Verna M. Thompson attached hereto
and marked exhibit "A" and that certain EASEMENT dated July 21,1972
Francis M. Dowling, Jr., attached hereto and marked exhibit "B" and
that certain EASEMENT dated October 3, 1972 from Leighton B. Taylor,
A.C. Nejedley and Shirley J. Nejedley attached hereto and marked
exhibit "C" and that certain SLOPE AND DRAINAGE RIGHTS conveyance
dated October 3, 1972 from Leighton B. Taylor, A. C. Nejedley and
Shirley J. Nejedley attached hereto and marked exhibit "D" all of
which said easements and conveyances transfer interests in or
easements upon real estate to the City of Beaumont for public
purposes pursuant to deed or grant be and the same hereby are
accepted and the City Council of the City of Beaumont, California
does hereby consent to the transfer of said easements and
conveyances to the City of Beaumont for public purposes as aforesaid.
ADOPTED this 16Lh day of November 19 72 .
Mayor of the City f Beaumont.
30
ATTEST:
Ci lerk of the City B umont
k-� 7 1 -
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF BEAUMONT
I, J. C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1972 -31 was duly
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City, duly held on
the Sixteenth day of November 1972, by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Hightower, Valdivia and Haskell
Noes: None
Absent: Councilmen Ochoa and Rodeman.
Dated November 169 1972 .
(SEAL)
WW
r-�
C7
Beaumont, California
November 27, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 P.M., in
the City Council Chambers of the City Hall, November 27th, 1972 with
Mayor Pro Tem Rodeman presiding.
A moment of Silent Prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilmen present: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia
and Hightower.
Absent: Councilman Haskell.
The minutes of the meeting held November 13th, 1972 and of the adjourned
meeting of November 16th, 1972 were approved as received.
The Planning Commission minutes of meeting held November 16th, 1972
were noted and filed.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia:
That the bills be paid as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Rodeman.
Noes: None.
Absent: Haskell.
Councilman Ochoa made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: To
adopt Resolution No. 1972 -32, to be copied into the minute book.
Ayes: Councilman Valdivia, Rodeman, Hightower and Ochoa.
Noes: None.
Absent: Haskell.
Councilman Ochoa made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: To
authorize Jim Schulties to paint the original portion of the City Hall,
at a cost of $325.00.
Ayes: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia, Hightower and Rodeman.
Noes: None.
Absent: Haskell.
Councilman Ochoa made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
Ordinance No. 442 pass its second reading and be adopted.
Ayes: Councilman Valdivia, Rodeman, Hightower and Ochoa.
Noes: None.
Absent: Haskell.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: That
the Chamber of Commerce be granted a no fee parade permit for December 6th,
1972 from 7:30 P.M. to 9:00 P.M.
Ayes: Councilman Valdivia, Rodeman, Hightower and Ochoa.
Noes: None.
Absent: Haskell.
Councilman Hightower made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia:
That Resolution No. 1972 -33 (Traffic Ordinance) amending portions of
Ordinance No. 369 be passed, to be copied into the minute book.
Ayes: Councilman Valdivia, Rodeman, Hightower and Ochoa.
Noes: None.
Absent: Haskell,
Councilman Ochoa made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia: The
City will grant the Police Departments request to install remote
transmitter at the Beaumont Police Department at an initial cost of
$543.00 and a monthly service charge from the Telephone Company of
$26.00.
Ayes: Councilman Valdivia, Rodeman, Hightower and Ochoa.
Noes: None.
Absent: Haskell.
43, 1
432
Councilman Valdivia made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
The City Clerk will transfer funds from the Street Lighting Fund for
the purpose of paying current bills pending the arrival of property
tax funds.
Ayes: Councilman Valdivia, Rodeman, Hightower and Ochoa.
Noes: None.
Absent: Haskell.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: To
appoint William Henderson as Planning Commissioner.
Ayes: Councilman Valdivia, Rodeman, Hightower and Ochoa.
Noes: None.
Absent: Haskell.
Councilman Valdivia made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower:
That City Clerk Jay Conley be appointed Assistant City Manager at a
salary of $200.00 per month.
Ayes: Councilman Valdivia, Rodeman, Hightower and Ochoa.
Noes: None.
Absent: Haskell.
Councilman Ochoa made a motion, seconded by Councilman Hightower: That
Assistant City Attorney, Maurice Taylor and his family be placed on the
City Medical Insurance Program.
Ayes: Councilman Valdivia, Rodeman, Hightower and Ochoa.
Noes: None.
Absent: Haskell.
Date of next regular study session set for Friday, December 81b, 1972
at 4 :00 P.M., in the City Managers Office.
There being no further business, Mayor Pro Tem Rodeman adjourned this
meeting at 8:40 P.M.
i
:i
Mayor
ATTEST:
ow
UM
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -32
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN INTERIM OPEN
SPACE PLAN
WHEREAS, Chapter 251 has been enacted by the 1972 ]Legislature
and signed by the Governor as an urgency statute, requiring the
adopting of open -space and conservation elements of the General Plan
by June 30, 1973, and
WHEREAS, Chapter 251 requires that every city and county shall,
by August 31, 1972, prepare, adopt and submit to the Secretary of
the Resouroes Agency, an interim open -space plan which shall be in
effect until June 30, 1973, now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Beaumont, County
of Riverside, State of California, in regular session assembled on
November 27, 1972 that the document on file with the City Clerk,
entitled Interim Open -Space Plan for the City of Beaumont dated
November 13, 1972, is hereby adopted as the Interim Open -Space Plan
of the City of Beaumont, to establish goals and policies to guide
the preparation and implementation of the final open -space plan and
the program for orderly completion and adoption of the final plan
by June 30, 1973•
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall endorse on
Q said element the date of its adoption by the Council and shall
transmit a copy of this resolution and the Interim Open -Space Plan
to the Secretary of the Resources Agency.
Dated: November 27, 1972.
By 1
Mayo ro- tempore
ATTEST:
C i i(,y,C1k - - - - - �� J
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT)
I, J. C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont, California
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1972 -32 was duly
read and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Beaumont held on the 274--h day of November, 1972, by the following
vote:
Aye6 :' Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and Hightower.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Haskell.
WITNESS my hand and seal this 27u day of November, 1972.
I y Beaumont
(SEAL)
4 3
434
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,
CALIFORNIA, PERTAINING TO TRAFFIC ORDINANCE NO. 369,
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 1972 -17, SECTION 5, ADDING SUB-
SECTION C, SECTION 7 -D (1), ADDING SUB- SECTIONS 0, P,
AND Q: SECTION 13 -A, ADDING SUB- SECTIONS (15) THROUGH (22);
SECTION 13 -B, AMENDING SUB - SECTION (1); AND PRESCRIBING
CERTAIN ADDITIONAL CHANGES TO EXPEDITE TRAFFIC FLOW AND
TRAFFIC SAFETY.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, it has been ascertained by the Police Department of
the City of Beaumont that a traffic - pedestrian hazard exists at the
intersection of "B" Street and Olive Avenue where pedestrians cross
to Rangel Park, a City of Beaumont recreational area, the following
sub - section be added to Section 5, Three -way Stops, as follows:
C. "B" Street and Olive Avenue.
WHEREAS, it has been ascertained by the Police Department of
the City of Beaumont that certain traffic hazards exist at the
intersection of Magnolia Avenue and Ninth Street, at the intersection of
Magnolia Avenue and Tenth Street and at the intersection of Euclid
Avenue and Tenth Street, the following sub - sections are added to Section
7 -D (1), Intersection Stop Signs, as follows:
0. Magnolia Avenue and Ninth Street for north and south bound
on Magnolia Avenue.
P. Tenth Street and Magnolia Avenue for east and west bound
on Tenth Street.
Q. Euclid Avenue and Tenth Street for north and south bound
no
traffic on Euclid Avenue.
WHEREAS, it has been ascertained that in compliance with the
California Traffic Manual Section 6- 03.2 -J (Page 6 -16, Figure 6 -11)
the following sub - sections are added to Section 13 -A, No Stopping,
Standing, or Parking section, as follows:
(15) Beginning at the east curb line of Beaumont Avenue, north
side of Sixth Street and continuing east for 68 feet.
(16) Beginning at the west curb line of Beaumont Avenue, north
side of Sixth Street and continuing west for 68 feet.
(17) Beginning at the east curb line of Beaumont Avenue, south
side of Sixth Street and continuing east for 68 feet.
(18) Beginning at the west curb line of Beaumont Avenue, south
side of Sixth Street and continuing west for 68 feet.
(19) Beginning at the north curb line of Sixth Street, east
side of Beaumont Avenue and continuing north for 68
feet.
(20) Beginning at the south curb line of Sixth Street, east um
side of Beaumont Avenue and continuing south for 68
feet.
(21) Beginning at the north curb line of Sixth Street, west
side of Beaumont Avenue and continuing west for 68 feet.
(22) Beginning at the south curb line of Sixth Street, west
side of Beaumont Avenue and continuing west for 68 feet.
WHEREAS, to conform with changes in the No Stopping, Standing,
Parking section, the following amendment is made to Sub - Section
13 -B (1) Loading Zone, as follows:
Starting at the existing No Stopping, Standing, or
Parking Zone, as indicated in Section 13 -A (15), at the
north east corner of Sixth Street and Beaumont Avenue
and continuing east for 65 feet.
WHEREAS, to expedite traffic flow and increase traffic safety,
any of the aforementioned sections of this resolution or any other
resolution of City Ordinance No. 369 may be changed and,/or altered
�+ by the Chief of Police or his designate in emergency or hazardous
r-�
situations to facilitate traffic safety on a temporary basis.
Temporary Defined - Temporary as used in the aforementioned
L section means such change to be made for the period of time the
said emergency or hazardous situations to facilitate traffic
safety on a temporary basis.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the foregoing amendments
be added to the Traffic Resolution No. 1972 -17, Ordinance No. 369, and
that said regulation governing the traffic flow be adopted by the
City Council of the City of Beaumont as hereinabove set forth in
detail, and same is hereby approved and adopted.
Passed and Adopted this 27tb day of November 1972.
By _
yo Pro Tem
ATTEST:
i
erk
STA E OF CALIFORNIA)
COUF <TY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT)
I, J. C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont, California do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1972 -33 was duly read
andadopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Beaumont, held on the 271b day of November, 1972, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and Hightower.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilman Haskell.
WITNESS my hand and seal this 27!b day of November, 1972.
i
C' lerk, City o umont
(SEAL)
435
3' 6
ORDINANCE NO. 442
An ordinance of the City of Beaumont amending Ordinance No-333
by adding thereto Section 7 -r, Patio, Garage and Yard Sales and by
adding to Section 9 thereof a license rate therefor and repealing all
ordinances or parts thereof in conflict herewith.
The City Council of the City of Beaumont does hereby ordain as
follows:
Section 1. Section 7 of Ordinance No. 333 is hereby supple-
mented by adding thereto Subsection 7 -r as follows:
Section 7 -r. For the ur oses of this ordinance �
p p , patio, garage
and /or yard sales are defined as a sale held at a private residence
by the owner or owners, tenant and /or occupant thereof and since it is
recognized that it is necessary to dispose ofpersonal property by means of
an on -site sale, this section is designed to define the limits of such sales.
7 -r (a) Patio, garage and /or yard sales shall be held no more
often than once each six months at any residential address and for a period
not to exceed five (5) consecutive days.
7 -r (b) A license shall be required for sales such as described
in Subsection 7 -r (a) hereof and such license shall not be issued more often
than once in each six months, shall be valid only for a stated residential
address and for no longer than five (5) consecutive days.
7 -r (c) Licenses required hereunder shall be issued by the
City Treasurer upon the payment of the license fee therefor, as hereinafter
provided, and said licenses shall state the beginning and ending dates of
such sale.
7 -r (d) Estate sales for the disposition of personal property
of a deceased occupant of a residence may be issued by the City Treasurer
to the personal representative of such decedent. The duration of such sales
shall be for a reasonable length of time as determined by the City Treasurer.
7 -r (e) Nothing herein contained is intended, nor shall it
prevent or prohibit various types of sales held by recognized charitable
or social organizations having their headquarters within the corporate
limits of the City of Beaumont.
7 -r (f) All goods, products and merchandise proposed to be sold
at a patio, garage and/or yard sale are subject to inspection by any peace
officer of the City of Beaumont in the exercise of his duty as such.
Section 2. Section 9 of Ordinance No. 333 is hereby supplemented
by inserting therein between Paint and Oil Dealer and Pawnbroker, Patio, Garage
or Yard Sales - Per Sale - $5.00.
Section 3. All other ordinances or parts thereof in conflict
herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
ordinance and cause the same to be published once in the Record - Gazette,
a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of
Beaumont.
INTRODUCED AT A REGULAR MEETING held the 121 day of November 1972 and
regularly passed and adopted on the 27Lh day of November 1972.
AYES: Councilman Valdivia, Ochoa, Rodeman and Hightower.
NOES: NONE.
ABSENT: Count.alman Haskell.
Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST:
C erk
ATTEST:
r..
d'
Q
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J. C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont, hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly and regularly passed
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Beaumont, at a regular
meeting of said Council held on the 27+h day of November, 1972.
Ci ;4--
ty o umont
(SEAL)
38
Beaumont, California
December 11, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 P.M. in
the City Council Chambers of the City Hall, December 11, 1972, with
Mayor Albert Haskell presiding.
Reverend 0. D. Johnson gave the Invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilmen present: Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa and Valdivia.
Absent: Councilman Hightower.
The minutes of the regular meeting held November 27L+, 1972 were approved
as read.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa, that the
City pay the bills as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and Haskell. UO
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Hightower.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa, that
the City grant Cherry Valley Sanitation an extension of route time from
1/11/73 to 6/19/73.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Hightower.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa, that
the City Manager purchase 2 paving breakers, a backfill tamper,
4 compressor hoses and fittings, and 2 sets of toe protectors, not to
exceed a cost of $1,500.00. He was instructed to check County prices.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Hightower.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa, that the
City engage an appraiser at an estimated cost of $250.00 to appraise
the Sixth Street School.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Hightower.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa, that
the City open bids for maintenance and repairs of Eighth Street. This
meeting will be adjouned to Thursday, December 21, 1972 at 8:00 P.M.,
to go over the bids. -
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Hightower.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia, that
the City approve the P.E.P. Program from November 1, 1972 thru June 30,
1974.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Hightower.
The following communications were read: Mayors and Councilmens meeting
December 12 -13 at the Rusty Lantern. Mayor Haskell, Councilman Valdivia,
Ochoa and Rodeman will attend.
A report on the Coalition of Mayors was read.
UW
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia,
that the City approve this organization.
Ayes: Councilman Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and Haskell.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Hightower.
Date of the next regular study session set for Thursday, December 21,
1972, following the adjourned meeting in the City Managers office.
A study session was designated for Thursday, December 14, 1972 at
4:00 P.M., in the City Managers office to study a proposed budget forX
Revenue Sharing.
There being no further business, Mayor Haskell adjourned this meeting
to December 21, 1972 at 8:00 P.M., to go over bids on Eighth Street.
Adjourned 8:45 P.M.
ATTEST:
C t erk
C�
s
Mayor
Beaumont, California
December 19, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a special meeting at 12 :00 Noon in
the City Managers office in the City Hall, December 19Lh, 1972 with
Mayor Albert Haskell presiding.
The roll call found the following Councilmen present: Councilman
Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Rodeman. Absent: Councilman Hightower.
Councilman Rodeman made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa to
purchase two 1973 Dodge Coronets, Police Package, at the unit price of
$3,o69.8o plus 5% Sales Tax.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Rodeman.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Hightower.
Councilman Rodeman made the motion to adjourn.
4%
Mayor
ATTEST:
j{
C' erk
439
Beaumont, California
December 21, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met for the-adjburned. meeting opened by
Mayor Haskell at 6:00 P.M.
The Councilmen present were: Councilmen Rodeman, Ochoa, Valdivia and
Haskell. Mr. Dotson, City Engineer presented bids for capping
Eighth Street.
Big M. Construction Company. $ 14,916.00
Bear Valley Paving Company. $ 12,379.20
Kettering Paving. $ 13,672.00
Motion by Councilman Valdivia seconded by Councilman Ochoa to accept
low bid, and award the contract to low bidder.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa and Valdivia. ISO
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Hightower.
Job to begin about January 4Lh, 19 73. Estimated time of Completion
4 days.
Motion by Councilman Rodeman seconded by Councilman Ochoa to approve
suggested Revenue Sharing funds expenditure as suggested by City
Manager Ward.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman Ochoa and Valdivia.
Noes: None.
Councilman Rodeman made the motion to adjourn.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Wo
441,
Beaumont, California
December 26, 1972
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 P.M. in the
City Council Chambers of the City Hall, December 26, 1972 with Mayor
Albert Haskell presiding.
Reverend 0. D. Johnson gave the Invocation.
After the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the
following Councilmen present: Haskell, Ochoa and Valdivia.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
The minutes of the regular meeting held December 11th, 1972, the
Special Meeting held December 19, 1972 and the adjourned meeting held
December 21, 1972 were approved as received.
Councilman Ochoa made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia: to
pay bills as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Ochoa and Valdivia.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
The Planning Commission minutes of December 14, 1972 were approved as
received.
Councilman Ochoa made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia: to
approve the request of Alta View Mobil Home Park to place control signs
on City Parkway designating Exit only on the 14Lh Street approach.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Ochoa and Valdivia.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
The request of the American Legion to present Lease Proposal to the
City of Beaumont was referred to Park and Public Building Committes.
Councilmen present seemed to favor the proposal.
On motion of Councilman Haskell, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; the
request of City Manager for Resolution of Intention to Commence
Abatement Prodeedings on certain properties within the City Limits of
Beaumont be granted. Resolutions were adopted for the following
properties:
Resolution No. 1972 -34 - 614 Wellwood Avenue; Resolution No. 1972-35-
37860 Highway 60; Resolution No. 1972 -36 - 895 Massachusetts Avenue;
Resolution No. 1972-37 - 573 East Fifth Street; Resolution No. 1972 -38-
579 East Fifth Street.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Ochoa and Valdivia.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
Councilman Ochoa made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia: to
grant the request of City Clerk to increase Petty Cash fund from
$50.00 to $100.00.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Ochoa and Valdivia.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
Councilman Ochoa made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia: to
issue a probationary six month license to Betty Felix for a Massage
Parlor at 218 East Sixth Street.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Ochoa and Valdivia.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
442
Councilman Haskell made a motion, seconded by Councilman Valdivia:
To adopt Resolution No. 1972 -39 granting funds not to exceed. $300.00
per year to R.I.N.E.T.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Ochoa and Valdivia.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
Councilman Haskell made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: to
reject the claim against State of California and City of Beaumont
and Insurance Company.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Ochoa and Valdivia.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
Councilman Haskell made a motion, seconded by Councilman Ochoa: to ■r
pave Third Street with County equipment and personnel on a day labor
basis, reimbursable to Riverside County. The estimated cost being
$19,480.00.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Ochoa and Valdivia.
Noes: None.
Absent: Councilman Rodeman.
The following communications were read:
Letter from City of San Jacinto thanking City Council and City Manager
for participating in the Christmas Parade.
A letter was ordered to be sent to the Hightower family in appreciation
of service of Councilman Howard Hightower.
Date of next regular study session set for Friday, January 5tb, 1973 at
4 :00 P.M., in the City Managers office.
There being no further business, Mayor Haskell adjourned this meeting
at 9:15 P.M.
Mayor
ATTEST:
ow
WMW
443
RESOLUTION NO. 1972-34
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY. COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT,CALIFORNIA, DECLARING STRUCTURE TO BE A
PUBLIC NUISANCE AND INTENTION OF THE CITY TO
COMMENCE ABATEMENT PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
ORDINANCE NO. 364.
WHEREAS, it has been determined upon strict examination
by the Fire Chief and the Building Inspector of the City of
Beaumont structure located at 614 Wellwood Avenue in the City
of Beaumont, County of Riverside, State of California, does not
conform with the Building Code of the City of Beaumont, and is
unsafe for human habitation.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City of
Beaumont as follows:
Section 1. That certain structure located at 614 Wellwood
Avenue, is hereby, determined to be unfit and unsafe for human
habitation.
Section 2. That certain structure above described and
commonly known as 614 Wellwood Avenue does not conform with the
Building Code of the City of Beaumont and by reason of its unsafe
condition is hereb} declared to be a public nuisance and that it is
the intention of the City Council to commence abatement proceedings
�+ of said public nuisance in pursuance of the provisions contained in
r-I Ordinance No. 364 of the City of Beaumont and that any and all
Q persons having any objection to or interest in the proposed removal
or repair of such unsafe or dilapidated structure shall be notified
L7 to attend a meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont to
be held in the City Hall on the 12th day of February at the hour
of 7:30 P.M., 1973, to show cause, if any they have, or state their
objections to the said abatement of the nuisance herein described.
Section 3. The said structure hereby declared to be .a
public nuisance and unsafe for human habitation is more particularly
described as follows:
Block 3, LOt 9 as shown in the current assessors maps of the City
of Beaumont.
Section 4. The City Clerk of the City of Beaumont is
hereby directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the
owner or reputed owner of the said premises above described and a
certified copy of the said resolution to the County Recorder of
the County of Riverside, State of California.
Passed and adopted this 26th day ecember 1972.
C
Mayor of City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
4kk
S TE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J.C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 1972 -34 was duly passed
and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Beaumont duly held on the 26th day of December, 1972, by the
following vote:
AYES: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia and Haskell.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilman Rodeman.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal o he City of Beaumont,
this 29th day of December, 1972.
Clerk_ City of a umont
(SEAL)
444 , 1 _
RESOLUTION NO. 1972- 35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT
DECLARING STRUCTURE TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND INTENTION
OF THE CITY TO COMMENCE ABATEMENT PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
ORDINANCE NO. 364.
WHEREAS, :it has been determined upon strict examination by
the Fire Chief and the Building Inspector of the City of Beaumont that
the structure located at 37860 Highway 60 in the City of Beaumont,
County of Riverside, State of California, does not conform with the
Building Code of the City of Beaumont, and is unsafe for human
habitation.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City of
Beaumont as follows:
Section 1. That certain structure located at 37860
Highway 60 is hereby determined to be unfit and unsafe for human
habitation.
Section 2. That certain structure above described and
commonly known as 37860 Highway 60 does not conform with the
Building Code of the City of Beaumont and by reason of its unsafe
condition is hereby declared to be a public nuisance and that it is the
intention of the City Council to commence abatement proceedings of said
public nuisance in pursuance of the provisions contained in Ordinance
No. 364 of the City of Beaumont and that any and all persons having any
objection to or interest in the proposed removal or repair of such unsafe
or dilapidated structure shall be notified to attend a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Beaumont to be held in the City Hall on the
12th day of February, 1973, at the hour of 7:30 P.M., to show cause, if
any they have, or state their objections to the said abatement of the
nuisance herein described.
Section 3. The said structure hereby declared to be a
public nuisance and unsafe for human habitation is more particularly
described as follows: A portion of the South 1/2 of Section 5.-Township
3 South, Range 1 West. Shown as Lot 6 in the current assessors maps of
the City of Beaumont.
Section 4. The City Clerk of the City of Beaumont is
hereby directed to send a certified copy of this.resolution to the
owner or reputed owner of the said premises above described and a
certified copy of the said resolution to the County Recorder of the
County of Riverside, State of California.
Passed and adopted this 26th day of December 1972.
Mayor of City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
rk
SATE OF CAIFORNIA)
OUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J.C. Conley City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 1972 - 35 was duly passed
and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Beaumont duly held on the 26th day of December, 1972, by the following
vote:
AYES: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia and Haskell.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilman Rodeman.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the City of Beaumont,
this 29th day of December, 1972.
C' y le k, of Beaum nt
(SEAL)
ao
aw
um
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 - 36
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT DECLARING STRUCTURE TO BE A PUBLIC
NUISANCE AND INTENTION OF THE CITY TO COMMENCE
ABATEMENT PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO.
364.
WHEREAS, it has been determined upon strict examination
by the Fire Chief and the Building Inspector of the City of
Beaumont that the structure loca ted at 895 Massachusetts
Avenue in the City of Beaumont, County of Riverside, State of
California, does not conform with the Building Code of the
City of Beaumont, and is unsafe for human habitation.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City of
Beaumont as follows:
Section 1. That certain structure located at 895
Massachusetts Avenue is hereby determined to..be unfit and
unsafe for human habitation.
Section 3. The said structure hereby declared to be a
public nuisance and unsafe for human habitation is more
particularly described as follows:
Block 59, Lot 14 as shown in the current assessors maps of the
City of Beaumont.
Section 4. The City Clerk of the City of Beaumont is
hereby directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to
the owner or reputed owner of the said premises above described
and a certified copy of the said resolution to the County
Recorder of the County of Riverside, State of California.
Passed and adopted this 26th day of December 1972.
�
Maybr of City of Beaumont
ATTES
S )ATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J.C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY
that the foregoing Resolution No. 1972 - 36 was duly passed and
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Beaumont duly held on the 26th day of December 1972, by the follow
ing vote:
AYES: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia and Haskell.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilman Rodeman.
WITNESS my hand and the offcial seal of—Lhe City of Beaumont,
this 29th day of December 1972.
k
9
Z
ty rk,City o nt
(SEAL)
Section 2. That certain structure above described and
commonly known as 895 Massachusetts Avenue does not conform
with the building code of the City of Beaumont and by reason
of its unsafe condition is hereby declared to be a public
nuisance and that it is the intention of the City Council to
�+
commence abatement proceedings of said public nuisance in
pursuance of the provisions contained in Ordinance No. 364
of the City of Beaumont and that any and all persons having any
objection to or interest in the proposed removal or repair of
such unsafe or dilapidated structure shall be notified to attend
a meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont to be held
in the City Hall on the 12th day of February 1973, at the hour
of 7:30 P.M. to show cause, if any they have, or state their
objections to the said abatement of the nuisance herein described.
Section 3. The said structure hereby declared to be a
public nuisance and unsafe for human habitation is more
particularly described as follows:
Block 59, Lot 14 as shown in the current assessors maps of the
City of Beaumont.
Section 4. The City Clerk of the City of Beaumont is
hereby directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to
the owner or reputed owner of the said premises above described
and a certified copy of the said resolution to the County
Recorder of the County of Riverside, State of California.
Passed and adopted this 26th day of December 1972.
�
Maybr of City of Beaumont
ATTES
S )ATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J.C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY
that the foregoing Resolution No. 1972 - 36 was duly passed and
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Beaumont duly held on the 26th day of December 1972, by the follow
ing vote:
AYES: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia and Haskell.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilman Rodeman.
WITNESS my hand and the offcial seal of—Lhe City of Beaumont,
this 29th day of December 1972.
k
9
Z
ty rk,City o nt
(SEAL)
446
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 - 37
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT DECLARING STRUCTURE TO BE A PUBLIC
NUISANCE AND LNTENTION OF THE CITY TO
COMMENCE ABATEMENT PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
ORDINANCE NO. 364.
WHEREAS, it has been determined upon strict examination
by the Fire Chief and the Building Inspector of the City of
Beaumont that the structure located at 573 East Fifth Street
in the City of Beaumont, County of Riverside, State of California
does not conform with the Building Code of the City of Beaumont,
and is unsafe for human habitation.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City of
Beaumont as follows:
Section 1. That certain structure located at 573 East
Fifth Street is hereby determined to be unfit and unsafe for
human habitation.
Section 2. That certain structure above described and
commonly known as 573 East Fifth - Street does not conform with the
Building Code of the City of Beaumont and by reason of its unsafe
condition is hereby declared to be a public nuisance and that it is
the intenti6n of the City Council to commence abatement proceedings
of said public nuisance in pursuance of the provisions contained in
Ordinance No. 364 of the City of Beaumont and that any and all
persons having any objection to or interest in the proposed removal
or repair of such unsafe or dilapidated structure shall be notified
to attend a meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont to be
held in the City Hall on the 12th day of February 1973, at the hour
of 7 :30 P.M., to show cause, if any they have, or state their objections
to the said abatement of the nuisance herein described.
Section 3. The said structure hereby declared to be a
public nuisance and unsafe for human habitation is more particularly
described as follows:
Block 116, Lot 16 as shown in the current assessors maps of the City of
Beaumont.
Section 4. The City Clerk of the City of Beaumont is
hereby directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the
owner or reputed owner of the said premises above described and a
certified copy of the said resolution to the County Recorder of the
County of Riverside, State of California.
Passed and adopted this 26th day of December 1972.
Mayor of City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
erK y
STA OF CALIFORNIA)
CO Y OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J.C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that the foregoing Resolution No. 1972 - 37 was duly passed and adopted
at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont duly held
on the 26th day of December 1972, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia and Haskell.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilman Rodeman.
WITNESS: my hand and the official seal of the City of Beaumont, this
29th day of December 1972.
y Jerk, City o nt
(SEAL)
D
RESOLUTION NO. 1972-- 38
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT DECLARING STRUCTURE TO BE A PUBLIC
NUISANCE AND INTENTION OF THE CITY TO COMMENCE
ABATEMENT PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO.
364.
WHEREAS, it has been determined upon strict exAmination
by the Fire Chief and the Building Inspector of the City of
Beaumont that the structure located at 579 East Fifth Street
in the City of Beaumont, County of Riverside, State of
California,does not conform with the Building Code of the City
of Beaumont, and is unsafe for human habitation.
ATTEST:
2qt Clerk
S ATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONr )
I, J.C. Conley City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 1972 -38 was duly
passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Beaumont duly held on the 26th day of December 1972, by the
following vote:
AYES: Councilman Ochoa. Valdivia and Haskell.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilman Rodeman.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the City of Beaumont,
this 29th day of December 1972.
y erk, City nt
(SEAL)
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City of
Beaumont as follows:
Section 1. That certain structure located at 579 East
Fifth Street is hereby determined to be unfit and unsafe for
human habitation.
Section 2. That certain structure above described and
comonly known as 579 East Fifth..Street does not conform with the
Building Code of the City of Beaumont and by reason of its unsafe
condition is hereby declared to be a public nuisance and that it
�..
is the intention of the City Council to commence abatement
proceedings of said public nuisance in pursuance of the provisions
contained in Ordinance No. 364 of the City of Beaumont and that any
Q
and'all persons having any objection to or interest in the proposed
removal or repair of such unsafe or dilapidated structure shall be
Q
notified to attend a meeting of the City Council of the City of
Beaumont to be held in the City Hall on the 12th day of February
1973, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. to show cause, if any they have, or
state their objections to the said abatement of the nuisance herein
described.
Section 3. The said structure hereby declared to be a
public nuisance and unsafe for human habitation is more.particularly
described as follows: Block 116, Lot 17 as shown in the current
assessors maps of the City of Beaumont.
Section 4. The City Clerk of the City of Beaumont is
hereby directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the
owner or reputed owner of the said premises above described and a
certified copy of the said resolution to the County Recorder of the
County of Riverside, State of California.
Passed and adopted this 26th day of December 1972.
t '
Mayor of City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
2qt Clerk
S ATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONr )
I, J.C. Conley City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 1972 -38 was duly
passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Beaumont duly held on the 26th day of December 1972, by the
following vote:
AYES: Councilman Ochoa. Valdivia and Haskell.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilman Rodeman.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the City of Beaumont,
this 29th day of December 1972.
y erk, City nt
(SEAL)
448
RESOLUTION NO. 1972 - 39
WHEREAS, the California Council on Criminal Justice may
consent to review for possible funding the project submitted by the
Riverside County Allied Law Enforcement Agencies referred to as the
Regional Integrated Narcotic Enforcement Team.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City
Council, is directed to execute on behalf of the City of Beaumont,
the Application for grant for law enforcement purposes and special
conditions attached thereto.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant agrees to
provide the required matching funds to said project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that grant funds received
hereunder shall not be used to supplant ongoing law enforcement
expenditures.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said grant funds shall not
exceed $300.00 per year.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 26th day of December, 1972.
i`
Mayor City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
7 C' erk, City o eaumont
ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J. C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY CERTIFY
THAT THE FOREGOING Resolution No. 1972 -39 was duly passed and adopted at
a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont duly held
on the 26th day of December, 1972, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman.Ochoa, Valdivia and Haskell.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilman Rodeman.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the City of Beaumont, this
29th day of December, 1972.
er , City of wont
(SEAL)
No
t-
d'
Q
Q
Beaumont, California
January 8, 1973
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers of the City Hall, January 8, 1973 with Mayor Albert Haskell
presiding.
A moment of silent prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the following
Councilmen present: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa and Valdivia.
Present: 4
Absent: none
The minutes of the regular meeting held December 26, 1972 were approved as
received.
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City of
Beaumont will pay the bills as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa and Valdivia
Noes: None
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The City
Council adopted Underground Utility District #1, beginning at east limits of
the City on 3rd Street and extending to Beaumont Avenue.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa and Valdivia
Noes: None
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; Public Hearings
will be held January 19, 1973 and January 30, 1973 in the City Council Chambers
of the City Hall at 7:30 p.m.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa and Valdivia
Noes: None
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The request
of California Association of Retired Persons for $25.00 donation was tabled.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa and Valdivia
Noes: None
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; To adopt
Resolution No. 1973 -1, transferring T.O.P.I.C.S. allocation to the City of
Victorville.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa and Valdivia
Noes: None
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Valdivia, The Camp-
fire Girls must apply to the Police Department for a solicitors permit for
each solicitor.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa and Valdivia
Noes: None
Council adjourned to an executive Session to consider candidates for Council
vacancy.
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Rodeman; The City Council
appointed Mr. Jack Yoder to complete Mr. Howard Hightowers term.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa and Valdivia
Noes: None
The following communications were read:
Invitations to Riverside Mayors and Councilmens Council, January 10, 1973
at 7:30 p.m. at the Rusty Lantern.
Beaumont Chamber of Commerce Installation January 20, 1973 at the Alpine Hause.
Riverside County Chamber of Commerce Salute, January 11, 1973 at Highland Springs.
Date of next regular study session set for Friday, January 19, 1973 after the
Public Hearing.
There being no further business, Mayor Haskell adjourned this meeting at 9:15 p.m.
' y Jerk
Mayor ity of Beaumont
450
RESOLUTION N0.1973 -1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, TRANSFERRING
$4,779 OF TOPICS FUNDS TO THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE
WHEREAS, a Federal program for the improvement of traffic
operation and traffic safety, known as TOPICS, is being implemented under
the sponsorship of the various State governments; and
WHEREAS, the City of Beaumont apportionment of the State allo-
cations for the fiscal year 1971 -72 is in the total amount of $4,779; and
wwrr
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Beaumont has determined
that the City's allocation of the portion of these TOPICS funds could better
be expended in support of the TOPICS programs being developed by the City
of Victorville; and
WHEREAS, the administration of the Act provides for such assign-
ment of allocated funds between local government agencies;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Beaumont that the City of Beaumont hereby assigns to the City of Victorville
its 1971 -72 apportionment of $4,779 of TOPICS allocation to be used in the
construction of a proj -ct eligible for construction with such funds.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that certified copies of this resolution
be forwarded to the State Highway Engineer and to the District Engineer of
District VIII of the Division of Highways, Department of Public Works, State
of California.
ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the City Clerk this 8th day of January, 1973.
J I
Albert Haskell ow
Mayor of the City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
i
,, g���L
Jay (SEAL)
City Irk of the City of Bea ont
I, Jay Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont, California,
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly intro-
duced and adopted by the City Council of said City at its meeting held on
the 8th day of January, 1973, by the following vote, to wit:
Ayes: Councilmen; Haskell, Rodeman, Ochoa and Valdevia
Noes: None
Absent: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official seal of the City of Beaumont, California, this 8th day of no
January, 1973
(SEAL
Citv/Clerk of the City o- JBeaumont
Beaumont, California
January 22, 1973
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers of the City Hall, January 22, 1973 with Mayor Pro Tem Salvador
Valdivia presiding.
A moment of silent prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the following
Councilmen present: Councilman Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder.
Present: 3
Absent: Councilman Haskell and Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The minutes of the
regular meeting held January 8, 1973 were approved as received.
Ayes: 3
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Haskell and Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Yoder; The City of Beaumont
will pay the bills as audited.
Ayes: 3
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Haskell and Rodeman
d'
Ca The minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting held January 11, 1973 were approved
as received.
c�
On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City of Beaumont
rejected the City Attorney, David Berk's recommendation for Beaumont and Banning
Cities to each pay half of Paul A. Havensteins claim, and to request the Attorney
General reopen the investigation of this case after clearing with the District
Attorney.
Ayes: 3
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Haskell and Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Yoder; Mr. William Earl
Scripter of 2129 Westward, Banning, will be granted a city license to conduct
an Ambulance Service in the City of Beaumont, provided he presents the city with
a certificate of insurance for Public Liability of $100,000 and $300,000.
Ayes: 3
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Haskell and Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Yoder; To adopt Resolution
No. 1973 -2, offering to purchase the Sixth Street School for $5,000.00.
Ayes: 3
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Haskell and Rodeman
City Manager Ward submitted a rendering of a new City Seal to Council. It was
decided to request renderings for a new seal from the art departments of the
Beaumont High School and Mt. San Jacinto Junior College. A $25.00 savings bond
will be awarded to the student submitting the rendering selected by Council for
the new seal.
Ayes: 3
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Haskell and Rodeman
Date of next regular study session set for Friday, February 9, 1973 at 4:00 p.m.
in the City Managers office at City Hall.
There being no further business, Mayor Pro Tem Valdivia adjourned this meeting
to January 30th Public Hearing at 7:30 p.m. in Council Chambers at City Hall.
8:20 p.m.
Mayor City of Beaumont
lty 1
452,
RESOLUTION NO. 1973 -2
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COLS ?CIL OF TIE CITY OF BEAUMONT
AUTHORIZING TIE PURCHASE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
WHEREAS, that certain real property hereinafter described.
being used as a school by the Beaumont Unified School District can no
longer be utilized for school purposes and must be disposed of by the
Beaumont Unified School. District, and
WHEREAS, the City of Beaumont has a need for the said premises, and
WHEREAS, the same has been appraised by James Thompson & Associates
for the sum of $5,000.00 and Carl E. Mellor for the sum of $4,000.00 and it is
required by law that the higher of two appraisals be the one that is submitted
for the purchase of school property.
NOW, 'THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Beaumont as follows:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Beaumont by this resolu-
tion notifies Beaumont Unified School District that it intends to purchase the
hereinafter described real property for the sum of $5,000.00.
Section 2. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City
Manager, J.E. Ward, to communicate its said intention to the Beaumont Unified
School District to purchase said real property and to consumate the said pur-
chase no earlier than July 1, 1974. The said real property is particularly
described as follows:
Portions of Lots 9 and 12 and all of lots 11, 13
14, 155 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, and
25 and those portions of Alley vacated within
Block 86, of the Amended Map Of The Town Of
Beaumont,,as per plat recorded in Book 6 of Maps,
page 16, records of San Bernardino County, described
as follows:
BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of Lot 25 of said Block 86, said
point being the intersection of the North right -of -way line of
Sixth Street and the East right -of -way line of Magnolia Avenue;
thence East along the North line of Sixth Street 339.98 feet
(recorded by said map as 340 feet) to the Southeast corner of said
Lot 13 of said Block 86; thence North 000 Oil 25" East along the
West line of Orange Avenue, as shown by said map, 217.11 feet; thence
North 89° 54' 48" West 212.85 feet; thence South 000 05' 10"
West 60.34 feet; thence North 890 54' 52" West 127.06 feet to a
point on the East right -of -way line of said Magnolia Avenue; thence
South 000 Oil 18" West along the East line of Magnolia Avenue
157.28 feet to the point of beginning.
CONTAINING 1.520 acres more or less.
Passed and adopted this 8th day of January, 1973•
ATTEST:
1,
Mayor of City of Beaumont
r-1
Q
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J. C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1973 -2 was duly read and
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, held
on the 8th day of January, 1973, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Ochoa, Valdivia and Yoder
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Haskell and Rodeman
WITNESS my hand and seal this 8th day of January, 1973
(SEAL)
Minutes of Adjourned Meeting
held January 30, 1973
Ci k, City of Bea ont
Beaumont, Calif.
January 30, 1973
The Beaumont City Council reconvened in an adjourned meeting at 8:05 p.m. in
the City Council Chambers of the City Hall, January 30, 1973 with Mayor Albert
Haskell presiding.
The roll call found the following Councilmen present: Councilman Haskell,
Valdivia, and Ochoa.
Present: 3
Absent: Councilman Rodeman and Yoder
On the recommendation of City Engineer James Dotson, Councilman Valdivia made
a motion that California Avenue from 6th Street to 8th Street be capped with
asphaltic concrete, and also Magnolia Avenue between 6th Street and 7th Street.
Estimated cost of the project $4400.00. Motion was seconded by Councilman Ochoa.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia and Ochoa
Noes: none
Absent: Councilman Rodeman and Yoder
Council adjourned this meeting to the School Board Meeting in the Team Room of
the Beaumont Unified School District at 8:25 p.m.
Mr. Lucas, Beaumont Unified School District Superintendent, and City Manager
Ward were instructed to negotiate terms and conditions of the sale of Sixth
Street School to the City of Beaumont.
Parking was discussed, but no decisions were made. It will be discussed further
at a later date.
Meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
y,,rlerk
Mayor of City of Beaumont
45 3.
454
Beaumont, Calif.
February 13, 1973
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers of the City Hall, February 13, 1973 with Mayor Albert Haskell presiding.
A moment of silent prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance of the Flag, the rool call found the following
Councilmen present: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder.
Present: 4
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The minutes of r
the regular meeting held January 22 and the adjourned meeting held January 30,
1973 were approved as received.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The City of
Beaumont will pay the bills as audited.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
The minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting held January 11, 1973 were
approved as received.
The Public Hearing was opened on Condemnations.
37860 Highway 60; Hearing closed at 7:45 p.m. , no one appeared for or against
proceedings.
573 and 579 East Fifth Street; Roy Leaders, owner of Golden West Motel, 625
East Fifth Street said he has been trying for five years to get something done
about these places. No one else appeared for against abatement proceedings.
Hearing.closed at 7:50 p.m.
895 Massachusetts Avenue; Hearing adjourned to lst meeting in April, 1973•
Ayes: 4 V
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
The Board of Trustees of the Beaumont Unified School District called to order
their adjourned meeting of February 13, 1973 in the Council Chambers of the
City Hall. President Fred Hicks read the resolution of the Board concerning
the purchase of the Sixth Street School.
On motion of Ray Ramont, seconded by Dr. John Moore;. The Board of Trustees of
the Beaumont Unified School District adopts Resolution #1973 -21.
Ayes: 5
Noes: None
Payment to be made on possession of property on or after July 1, 1974.
A report of the Civic Center Association was presented. Resolution #1973 -1 of
the Civic Center Association was read by Margo Owings, Secretary. Joe Pistilli,
president, presented the Council with a check in the amount of $5,255.95 to reno-
vate the Sixth Street School Auditorium.
On motion of Councilman Haskell, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City of Beaumont
accepts the donation and said amount will be placed in a special savings account
for repair of the auditorium.
On motion of Councilman Haskell, seconded by Councilman Yoder; The City of Beaumont
will participate in the County purchase agreement for oil and grease. Resolution
#1973 -3 was adopted for that purpose.
Ayes: 4 Now
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The City of Beaumont
rejects the complaint of Rita V. Carrol Re: Damage to personal vehicle, and refers
the complaint to the City's Insurance Company.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
455
On motion of Councilman Haskell, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The City of Beau-
mont will increase the Rinet Program to $1,000.00, as requested by the County
Sheriff.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
The following communications were read:
Mayors and Councilmans Meeting, to be held at the E1 Morroca Hotel, Thursday,
February 22, 1973 at 6:00 p.m. $6.00 per person. Contact Mr. Ward prior to
Friday, February 16th, 1973 for reservations.
A request for the City Council to adopt a resolution and proclamation by Governor
Reagan for Vocational Training Week was read.
On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City of Beaumont
adopts Resolution #1973 -4.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
City Manager Ward reported Bannings request for name charge of Sixth Street, east
of Highland Springs Road to Highland Home Road, to Ramsey. This request was on
the agenda of the County Board of Supervisors Meeting today. Mr. Ward sent a
letter to the Supervisors requesting time to bring this matter to Council. A
;.. three week continuation was granted.
e—a On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Yoder; The City of Beaumont
will adopt Resolution #1973 -5 declining the change.
Ayes: 4
Q Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
Date of next regular study session set for Friday, February 23, 1973 at 4:00 p.m.
in the City Managers office at City Hall.
There being no further business, Mayor Haskell adjourned this meeting.
RESOLUTION NO. 1973 -3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE
MOBIL OIL COMPANY BULK PURCHASE AWARD
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Beaumont, California, effective February
16, 1973, requests participation in the Mobil Oil Company bulk purchase award by
the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors for the purchase of gasoline, diesel
oil, kerosene and stove oil.
Be it further resolved that the Beaumont City Council of the City of
Beaumont approves the following terms and conditions relating to participation
in the County contract on gasoline, diesel oil, kerosene and stove oil:
1. Will make all purchases in its own name, for public
use only;
2. Will be responsible for payment directly to the vendor
and for tax liability, and will hold the County harmless
therefrom;
3. Has not and will not have in force any other contract
for like purchase.
4. Has not obtained and does not have under consideration
written bids or quotations from other vendors for like
purchase.
Passed and adopted this 13th day of February, 1973.
Mayor of the 'City of Beaumont
456
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J.C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont, California do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1973 -3 was duly read and
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont,
held on the 13th day of February, 1973, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Rodeman
WITNESS my hand and seal this 13th day of February, 1973•
(SEAL) ' y erk, City of ea t
RESOLUTION NO. 1973 -4
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT IN SUPPORT
OF THE OBJECTIVES OF VOCATIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL
TRAINING.
WHEREAS, vocational and occupational education includes programs in
agriculture, business and office, marketing and distribution, home economics
and homemaking, technical, trade and industry, health and work experience, and
is designed to prepare youth and adults of our state to become useful citizens
and productive skilled workers; and
WHEREAS, vocational and occupational education has made a major con-
tribution to the economic and general well being of the individual as well as to
the economic development of our state and nation, and has contributed substan-
tially to meet the needs for trained manpower in California; and
WHEREAS, the people, including business, industry and labor, have
financially and philosophically supported expanded programs of vocational and
occupational education; and
WHEREAS, vocational and occupational education will continue to
provide leadership in developing better citizens and more trained manpower to
meet the needs of our changing technology; and
WHEREAS, the vocational occupational education program enrollment is
now over 1,300,000 students, making California the leader in this area of educa-
tion; and
WHEREAS, by proclamation of the Governor of California, the week of
February 11 -17, 1973 has been designated Vocational Education Week; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Beaumont affirm its
support of the objectives of vocational and occupational education.
Passed and adopted this 13th day of February, 1973.
Mayor of City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
7
y Clerk
no
wo
No
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J.C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that the foregoing Resolution No. 1973 -4 was duly passed and adopted at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont duly held on the
13th day of February, 1973, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder.
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Rodeman
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the City of Beaumont, this
13th day of February, 1973•
(SEAL)
t— PROCLAMATION
r-4
d''
Q WHEREAS, the Vocational Amendments of 1968 have provided broader
It
concepts of education to prepare individuals for the world of work; and
Q
WHEREAS, through the increased emphasis on preparing individuals to
enter employment, many new programs are now available to assist students in
reaching their occupational goals; and
WHEREAS, one week in February has been set aside, by proclamation of
the Governor of California as Vocational Education Week; and
WHEREAS, the ultimate success of this endeavor rests with each and
every individual who is concerned with providing opportunities through a com-
prehensive educational curriculum for all students; and
WHEREAS, Vocational Education serves high school youth as well as
adults in preparing them for occupations in Agriculture, Business and Office,
Marketing and Distribution, Home Economics and Homemaking, Trade and Industries,
and Health, and through Vocational Counseling by assisting individuals to reach
their occupational goals:
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Albert Haskell
do hereby proclaim February 11th
I
r_
, Mayor of the City of BEAUMONT ,
through 17th , 1973, as
VOCATIONAL EDUCATION WEEK in the City of Beaumont
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set
my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Beaumont , to be affixed
this 13th day of February, 1973.
yor
RESOLUTION NO. 1973 -5
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT
PROTESTING PROPOSED CHANGE OF NAME OF SIXTH STREET
FROM HIGHLAND SPRINGS ROAD TO THE WESTERLY CITY LIMITS
OF THE CITY OF BANNING TO RAMSEY STREET.
WHEREAS, it has been proposed by certain residents of the City of
Banning that East Sixth Street from the present westerly city limits of
the City of Banning to Highland Springs Road be changed from Sixth Street to
Ramsey Street, and
WHEREAS, numerous business establishments along said street have
advertised their respective businesses and incurred considerable expense
regarding the same in the use of the name East Sixth Street and �r
WHEREAS, none of the area, under consideration, is within any
corporate City Limits, and
WHEREAS, said street has historically always been known as East
Sixth Street, is in the Beaumont Unified School District, is in the Beaumont
Judicial District, is in the Beaumont Cemetery and Beaumont Library Districts,
is in the Beaumont Park and Recreational District and has a Beaumont telephone
number.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Beaumont does resolve as follows:
Section I. The City of Beaumont does hereby protest any change of
name by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside from East Sixth
Street from the westerly city limits of the City of Banning to Highland Springs
Road to Ramsey Street or any other name.
Section 2. The City Clerk of the City of Beaumont is hereby directed
to deliver a certified copy of this resolution to the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors of Riverside County to be presented at the next regular meeting of
the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County.
Passed and adopted this 13th day of February, 1973.
r
Mayor of the City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J.C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
the foregoing Resolution No. 1973 -5 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meet-
ing of the City Council of the City of Beaumont duly held on the 13th day of
February, 1973, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder.
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Rodeman
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the City of Beaumont, this 13th
day of February, 1973.
(SEAL)
r
459
Beaumont, California
February 26, 1973
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers of the City Hall, February 26, 1973 with Mayor Albert Haskell presiding.
A moment of silent prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the following
Councilmen present: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder.
Present: 4
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
The minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held February 13, 1973 were approved
as received.
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The City of Beaumont
will pay the bills as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
t.. The minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting held February 8th, 1973 were approved
as received.
sC� On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The request from com-
prehensive health planning association for contribution was tabled for further study.
Q The Police Department will research the association and report to Council.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder.
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The City Council
adopts Resolution 41973 -6 for removal of stop signs North and South at Pennsylvania
Avenue and Antonell Court.
Ayes: Councilman Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder.
Noes: None
Abstain: Councilman Haskell
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City of Beaumont
will reject the request for participation in proposed Riverside County Comprehensive
Transportation Study and request funds be spent on local street repair study.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder.
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Haskell, seconded by Councilman Yoder; The City of Beaumont
rejected the proposed increase in cost of retirement for employees retired prior to
1971. The City Clerk was instructed to notify P.E.R.S. accordingly.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
The following communications were read:
Letter from Gertrude Knott, Editor AMR Newsletter.
Invitation to attend first general session of the Pacific -Asian Congress of Munici-
palities March 26 -April 1, 1973.
Mr. Conley, City Clerk reported on the meeting he and the City Treasurer attended on
Collection of taxes and special assessments. Material will be reproduced and dis-
tributed to council members and City Attorney.
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Yoder; Mr. Berk will attend
the City Attorneys Meeting in Redding May, 1973. The City will allocate $300.00 for
expenses.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
Date of next regular study session set for Friday, March 9, 1973 at 4:00 p.m. in
the City Managers office at City Hall.
There being no further business, Mayor Haskell adjourned this meeting.
/ l GAIL %/
Albert Haskell
J.C. Conley
r; i— ci o,-lr
RESOLUTION NO. 1973 -6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 369;
ADDING THERETO 6 STOP INTERSECTIONS AND ONE YIELD
INTERSECTION. ALSO DELETING A CERTAIN STOP INTER-
SECTION.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Part 1. The following intersections will be stop intersections.
(1) California and Wellwood, for north bound traffic on Wellwood
(2) California and Dale Streets, for east and west bound on Date
Street.
(3) Ninth Street and Euclid Avenue, for east and west bound on Euclid =
Avenue.
(4) Seventh Street and Edgar Avenue for east and west bound on Seventh
Street.
(5) Thirteenth Street and Edgar Avenue, west bound on Thirteenth Street.
Part 2. The following intersection will be a yield intersection.
(1) Myrl Drive and California Avenue, south bound on Myrl Drive north
of California Avenue.
Part 3. The following intersection will no longer be a three way stop inter-
section.
(1) Antonell Court and Pennsylvania Avenue stop only on Antonell Court
west bound.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said regulations governing the flow of traffic
in the City of Beaumont be adopted by the City Council of the City of Beaumont as
hereinabove set forth in detail be, and the same is hereby approved and adopted.
ATTEST:
STATE OF
COUNTY C
CITY OF BEAUMONT
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of February, 1973.
Mayor of City of Beaumont
I, J.C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
the foregoing Resolution No. 1973 -6 was duly passed and adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont duly held on the 26th day of
March 1973, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Yoder, Valdivia, Haskell and Rodeman
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Ochoa
WITNESS MY HAND and the official seal of the City of Beaumont, this 29th
day of February, 1973.
(SEAL)
i
C't 1 k, City of Bea ont No
600-A
Minutes of Special Meeting Beaumont, Calif.
held March 6, 1973 March 6, 1973
The Beaumont City Council met in a special session at 4:00 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers of the City Hall, March 6, 1973 with Mayor Albert Haskell
presiding.
The meeting was called to order at 4:04 p.m. , roll call found the following
Councilmen present: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder.
Present: S
Absent: None
The special meeting was called to order to discuss furnishing sewer services
outside the City Limits of Beaumont. City Manager Ward read the applicable
section, 302, of Ordinance #416.
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City of
Beaumont authorized the Sewer Service Agreement between Monarch Land and
Development Company and the City of Beaumont. Mayor Haskell, City Clerk
Conley and City Attorney Berk were authorized to sign the agreement.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder.
Noes: None
Absent: None
Meeting was adjourned at 4:45 p.m.
ZZ
`11r�Haskell
Mayor of City of Beaumont
ow
No
461
Beaumont, California
March 12, 1973
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers of the City Hall, March 12, 1973 with Mayor Haskell presiding.
A moment of silent prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll found the following
Councilmen present: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Valdivia, Ochoa.
Present: 4
Absent: Councilman Yoder
The minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held February 26, 1973 and the
Special Meeting held March 6, 1973 were approved as submitted.
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City of
Beaumont will pay the bills as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Rodeman
Absent: Councilman Yoder
Noes: None
The minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting held February 22, 1973 were noted
and filed.
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City of Beaumont
Q adopts Resolution #1973 -7, to amend Ordinance #416, setting the monthly sewer services
charge for users outside of the Corporate City Limits of Beaumont, by title only.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Rodeman
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City Council
of Beaumont adopts the supplement recommendations of the City Council Traffic
Committee, to Resolution 41973 -6, amending Ordinance 4369.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Valdivia and Ochoa
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The Beaumont City
Council accepted the recommendations of the City Manager to have all department
heads designated as Management Employees.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Valdivia and Ochoa
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The Beaumont City
Council granted the request of the Director of Public Services to sell surveyed
equipment, and instructed the Director to set a date for the sale according to
Government Code.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Valdivia and Ochoa
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
The following communications were read:
Recommendations from the Beaumont Chamber of Commerce for establishment of a Design
Review Board. Mayor Haskell requested a staff report be prepared for the April 9th
Council Meeting. Members of the Council were all in favor of establishing such a
Board.
Thank you from the VIP AAMA for Mayors Welcome Address at their symposium.
Report of the Police Department on the investigation ordered by the City Council
on the Comprehensive Health Planning Association. The City Manager was requested
to give a report at the April 9th Council Meeting.
City of Desert Hot Springs on Mayors' and Councilmen's Conference March 14, 1973.
Councilmen Haskell, Rodeman, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder, and City Manager Ward will
attend.
League of California Cities Legislative Bulletin, Legislative Conference May 14 -16.
Mayor Haskell and City Attorney Berk will attend.
4`6 2
City Clerk J. C. Conley will receive legislative bulletins from League of California
Cities and forward one copy to the City Attorney.
Letter from Mayor Elwood of Palmerston North, New Zealand, complimenting exchange
student Wilhelmina Beerden. Original letter will be sent to Wilhemina's parents
and copies will be sent to her school instructors.
Date of next regular study session set for Friday, March 23, 1973 at 4:00 p.m.
the City Managers office at City Hall.
There being no further business, Mayor Haskell adjourned this meeting at 9:05 p.m.
Albert Haske lot
Mayor
RESOLUTION NO. 1973 -7
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 516
(SEWER SERVICE CHARGES) OF ORDINANCE NO. 416
The City Council of the City of Beaumont, A California Municipality, acting in
accordance with Ordinance No. 416, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 516 is hereby amended by the addition of subsection F.
SECTION 2. Subsection F of Section 516 shall read as follows:
All sewer service charges to connect users of the Beaumont Sewerage System, r
outside of the corporate city limits of the city, shall be charged at the
rate of one and one half (1 1/2) times the rates heretofore specified in
Section 516 of Ordinance No. 416 of the City of Beaumont and shall be subject
to all amending Resolutions as provided for in Section 115.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
and it should thereupon take effect and be in force.
Passed and adopted this 12th day of March, 1973.
i
Albert Hask za--aeo� '
Mayor of the City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
t,/ /Clerk
SPATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS r
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J. C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont, California do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1973 -7 was duly read and
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont
held on the 12th day of March, 1973, by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Valdivia and Ochoa.
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
WITNESS my hand and seal this 12th day of March,
(SEAL) --
y erk, City of Beaumont
4G
Beaumont, California
March 26, 1973
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers of the City Hall, March 26, 1973 with Mayor Albert Haskell presiding.
A moment of silent prayer was held for the invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the following
Councilmen present: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Valdivia and Yoder.
Present: 4
Absent: Councilman Ochoa
On motion of Councilman Valdivia, seconded by Councilman Rodeman; The minutes of
the regular meeting held March 12, 1973 are accepted and submitted.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Ochoa
The minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting held March 22, 1973 were noted and
filed.
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Yoder; The Beaumont City
{r Council adopts Resolution X61973 -8; to look favorably upon the annexation of the
Highland Springs Lands.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Ochoa
G�
Captain John Minjares gave a report on the training program of the Beaumont Fire
Department, and gave a film presentation.
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Yoder; The Beaumont City
Council adopts Ordinance X6443, Re: rezoning of portion of Block 22 from R -1
to R -A. By title only.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Ochoa
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The Beaumont
City Council rejects the claim against the City of Beaumont for vehicle impounding
and refers it to the City Insurance Carrier.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Ochoa
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The Beaumont
City Council approves the purchase of a site for a future City Yard and Secondary
Fire Station.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Ochoa
On motion of Mayor Haskell, seconded by Councilman Rodeman; The City of Beaumont
will raise the Volunteer Fire Department from the existing 20 men to 26; with the
additional 6 men to be recruited from the south side of the railroad tracks.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Ochoa
On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The Beaumont City
Council tabled the report on the Comprehensive Health Planning.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Ochoa
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Yoder; The Beaumont City
Council rejects the Martin sewer damage claim and refers it to the City Insurance
Carrier.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Ochoa
464 - --
RESOLUTION NO. 1973 -8
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT FAVORING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
LANDS COMMONLY KNOWN AS HIGHLAND SPRINGS
LANDS AND A PORTION OF SECTION 35, RANGE 1
WEST AND TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH SBB &M
WHEREAS, MONARCH LAND AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION is a
California corporation holding options for the acquisition and purchase of
certain lands hereinafter described known as HIGHLAND SPRINGS LANDS and has
professed a preference in any annexation to be annexed to the CITY OF ,,?Aft
BEAUMONT, and
WHEREAS, in the proposed annexation there are twelve registered
voters residing therein, and
WHEREAS, the majority of the said residents in the said area
have indicated their desire to be annexed to the CITY OF BEAUMONT, and
WHEREAS, the CITY OF BEAUMONT is the principal political entity
in the area to which annexation is sought and
WHEREAS, certain Beaumont Districts have their easterly bound-
aries at the Highland Home Road at ranges 1 East and 1 West, San Bernardino
base and Meridian as follows:
1. The Beaumont Unified School District
2. The Beaumont - Cherry Valley Park and
Recreation District
3. The Beaumont Judicial District
4. The Beaumont Library District
5. The Beaumont Cemetery District and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the CITY OF BEAUMONT has entered
into contractual agreements, with the developer, for the disposal of the
waste waters, and
WHEREAS, the territory involved has historically been associated
with the CITY OF BEAUMONT, and wo
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the CITY OF BEAUMONT has
recommended the annexation of said territory to the CITY OF BEAUMONT
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved and determined by the
City Council of the CITY OF BEAUMONT as follows:
Section I. The CITY OF BEAUMONT does hereby determine that it
looks favorably upon the annexation of lands identified by legal descrip-
tion and Map No. 73 -19 as presented to the Local Agency Formation Commission
Offices at the County Courthouse in the City of Riverside, California, on
March 22, 1973.
Section 2. The City Council does hereby further determine that a
local election be held to be determined by the residents of the above described
area whether the said area should be annexed to the CITY OF BEAUMONT.
Section 3. The City Clerk of the CITY OF BEAUMONT is hereby directed
to send a certified copy of this resolution to the Local Agency Formation
Commission of the County of Riverside, State of California.
Passed and adopted this 26th day of March, 1973. _
MAYOR OF CiTY OF BEAUMONT
e�
Q
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
4
I, J.C. CONLEY, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1973 -8 was duly passed and adopted
at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont duly held on
the 26th day of March, 1973, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Yoder, Valdivia, Haskell and Rodeman
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Ochoa
WITNESS MY HAND and the official seal t e ity „of Beaumont,
this 29th day of March, 1973.
(SEAL)
Minutes of Special Meeting held April 4, 1973
L PA
Ir/E CITY OF B_7W_t
ag R4
Beaumont, California
The Beaumont City Council met in a sp -cial session at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers of the City Hall, April 4, 1973, with Mayor Albert Haskell presiding.
Purpose of this Special Meeting: To adopt Resolutions pursuant to the Environmental
Quality Act as required by law.
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m., roll call found the following council-
men present: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Valdivia and Yoder.
Present: 4
Absent: Councilman Ochoa, who arrived at 8:10 p.m.
On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Councilman Valdivia, Resolution 1973 -9
be read by title only.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder
Noes: None
On motion of Councilman Valdivia, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City of Beaumont
adopts Resolution 1973 -9.
Ayes: Councilmen Haskell, Rodeman, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder
Noes: None
On Motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Yoder; The City of Beaumont
does pass and adopt Resolution 1973 -10.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder
Noes: None
There being, o rt er business, the meeting was adj�r_la 8. P.ft
J. C. C V J it Clerk Albert Haskell, Mayor
RESOLUTION NO. 1973 -9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CRITERIA AND
PROCEDURES FOR THE EVALUATION OF PROJECTS AND
THE PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS
FOR PRIVATE PROJECTS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970, AS AMENDED
BY STATUTES 1972, CHAPTER 1154;
WHEREAS the California Legislature adopted Assembly Bill 889 which
was signed by the Governor on December 5, 1972, providing for the adoption of
guidelines by all public agencies to establish criteria and procedures for the
evaluation of projects and the preparation of Environmental Impact Reports pur-
suant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Beaumont as follows:
Section 1. The following criteria and procedures are hereby adopted
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended.
466
Section 2: DEFINITIONS. For the purposes of this resolution, the
following words and phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to
them:
A. Categorical Exemptions - Those private projects determined by
the City Council to have no significant effect on the environment and therefore
exempt from the requirement for the preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report.
B. Environment - The total conditions existing in an area which
will be affected by a proposed project including land, air, water, minerals,
flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance
and social and economic interaction.
C. Environmental Analysis - Information provided by the appli-
cant from which the Planning Department shall prepare a draft Environmental
Impact Report.
D. Environmental Assessment - A formal evaluation process to de-
termine whether a proposed project may have a significant effect on the
environment.
E. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) - A report which identifies
and analyzes the environmental effects, both positive and negative, of a
proposed project.
1. Draft EIR - a report prepared by the Planning
Department based on data provided by the appli-
cant and containing the elements described in
Section 8 C of this resolution.
2. Final EIR - an EIR containing the elements
described in Section 8 C of this resolution as
well as any comments resulting from the public
review of the draft EIR and the response of the
Planning Department to such comments.
F. Exemption Declaration (Negative Declaration) - A written announce-
ment filed with the Clerk of the County of Riverside indicating that a proposed
project, although not categorically exempt, will have no significant effect on the
environment if undertaken and therefore does not require the preparation of an EIR.
G. Notice of Completion - A brief written notice filed with the State
Secretary for Resources subsequent to the completion of a draft EIR and prior to
the distribution of copies of the draft for public review and /or comment. Such
notice shall include a brief description of the project, its proposed location,
and an address where copies of the draft EIR are available.
H. Notice of Determination - A brief written notice filed with the
Clerk of the County of Riverside subsequent to the Planning Commission's decision
to approve or disapprove a project. Such notice shall include the decision of
the Planning Commission to approve or disapprove the project, the determination
of the Planning Commission whether the project will have a significant effect on
the environment, and whether an EIR has been prepared in accordance with Section
8 through 11 of this resolution.
I. Person - Any person, firms, association, organization, partnership,
business, trust, corporation or company.
J. Project - The whole of any action undertaken by any person, result-
ing in a total impact on the environment, directly or indirectly.
1. Project includes:
(a) An activity directly undertaken by any
person including but not limited to con-
struction of new structures and related
activities, clearing of land, or improve-
ments to existing private structures.
(b) An activity undertaken by a person which
is supported in whole or in part through
public agency contracts, grants, subsidies,
loans, or other forms of assistance from
one or more public agencies.
(c) An activity involving the issuance to a
person of a lease, permit, license, certi-
ficate, or other entitlement for use by one UO
or more City departments.
2. Project does not include anything specifically exempted
by State law or this resolution.
K. Significant Environmental Effects - Those effects associated
with a substantial adverse (negative) impact on the environment, to include
but not limited to those action which:
C..
Q
C�
Q
1. Involve a large -scale alteration of existing
environmental components: air, water, land
configurations, plant or animal food chains
and habitats, and the like.
2. Could create substantial alteration of the
physical, chemical or biological properties
of the air, water or land in a manner contrary
to the promotion of the health, safety or
welfare of a substantial number of persons or
to the balance of an ecological resource.
3. Impact to a measurable degree upon rare or
endangered plant or animal species.
4. Could cause substantial interference with the
movement of any resident wildlife species.
5. May be subject to major geologic hazard or
create substantial flooding, erosion or
siltation.
6. Involve disruption of existing neighborhoods
or communities.
7. Could do irrevocable harm to the aesthetic
amenities of an area or resource.
8. Could substantially change existing uses of
an area or resource.
9. Disrupt or alter the appearance or surroundings
of a historical or archaeological site.
10. Are in conflict with City- adopted environmental
plans and goals.
Section 3: PROJECT EXEMPTI
A. Ministerial Project Exemptions - The following actions are hereby
found to be ministerial in nature and are therefore exempt from the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970.
1. Business licenses.
2. Final subdivision maps.
3. Sign permits.
4. Permits issued by the Police and
Fire Departments.
B. Categorical Exemptions - The following permits, rights, privileges
and other entitlements are found to have no significant effect on the environment
and officers, agents, boards, commissions, agencies and employees of the City of
Beaumont are authorized to issue appropriate approval of said permit, rights,
privileges and other entitlements upon compliance of all other applicable rules,
regulations and ordinances of the City of Beaumont. The categorically exempt
permits, rights, privileges and entitlements are enumerated as follows:
1. Tent permits.
2. Transportation permits.
3. Demolition permits provided that the demolition
permit is not for any landmark of cultural or
historical significance as officially designated
by Federal, State, County or local governmental
action.
4. Individual utility connections and disconnections.
5. Maintenance, repair, restoration, demolition or
replacement of private property or facilities
damaged or destroyed as a result of a disaster
in a disaster stricken area in which a state of
emergency has been proclaimed by the Governor
pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section
8550) of Division 1, Title 2 of the Government
Code, provided that such has been approved by
Federal, State, County or local governmental
action.
6. Operation, repair, maintenance or minor alteration
of existing private structures, facilities,
mechanical equipment, or topographical features,
involving negligible or no expansion of use
beyond that previously existing, including but
limited to:
(a) Interior or exterior alterations involving
interior partitions, plumbing, electrical
conveyances, roofing, painting and similar
activities.
(b) Existing facilities of investor -owned
utilities used to convey or distribute
electric power, natural gas, sewage, etc.
467
(c) Restoration or rehabilitation of deteriorated
or damaged structures, facilities or mechanical
equipment to meet current standards of public
health and safety, unless it is determined that
the damage was substantial and resulted from
an environmental hazard such as an earthquake,
landslide or flood.
(d) Additions to existing structures provided
that the addition will not result in an
increase of more than 50 percent of the
floor area of the structure before the
addition or alteration, or 2500 square feet,
whichever is less.
(e) Addition of safety or health protection
devises for use during construction of or r
in conjunction with existing structures,
facilities or mechanical equipment, or
topographical features where these devices
do not have or result in an adverse environ-
mental impact.
(f) Maintenance of existing landscaping and
native growth (excluding the use of economic
poisons (pesticides) as defined in Division 7,
Chapter 2, California Agricultural Code).
(g) Division of existing multiple family rental
units into condominiums.
7. Replacement or reconstruction of existing structures
and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as
the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and
capacity as the structure replaced, including but not limited to:
(a) Replacement or reconstruction of existing
schools and hospitals to provide earthquake
resistant structures which do not increase
capacity by more than 50 percent.
(b) Replacement of a commercial structure with
a new structure of substantially the same
size and purpose.
8. Basic data collection, research, experimental manage-
ment and resource evaluation activities which do not result in a serious or
major disturbance to an environmental resource. These may be for strictly 1�
information gathering purposes, or as part of a study leading to an action
which the City has not yet approved, adopted or funded.
9. In every case where any of the following conditions are
found to exist as a result of the project, the project shall be found to have
a significant effect on the environment and an EIR will be required:
(a) Impacts which have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment or curtail
the range of the environment.
(b) Impacts which achieve short -term to the dis-
advantage of long -term environmental goals.
(c) Impacts for a project which are individually
limited but cumulatively considerable.
(d) The environmental effects of a project will
cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, directly or indirectly.
Significant effects include environmental consequences of both a
primary and secondary nature. Primary effects (e.g. large amounts of noise
resulting from the construction of a new industrial complex) should not be
given greater consideration than secondary effects (e.g. changes in land use which
may occur as a result of the project).
C. Categorical Exemption -- Exception by Location - A project that is
ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may, in a particularly r
sensitive environment, be significant. Therefore, such items are considered to
be exempt in all instances, EXCEPT where the project may impact on an environmental
resource or hazard of critical concern as may be hereafter designated, precisely
mapped, and oficially adopted pursuant to law. (Except as otherwise designated,
the Planning Department shall be authorized to make a determination regarding the
exemption status of any project covered by the provisions of this section. Any
person aggrieved or affected by any decision of the Planning, or other, Department
regarding the exempt status of a project may appeal to the City Council in the
manner prescribed in Section 6 H of this resolution.) All exemptions for these
classes are inapplicable when the comulative impact of successive projects of the
same type in the same locale, over time, is significant - -for example, annual
additions to an existing building under Section 3 B 6 (d). Upon determination
of the project's favorable location, the following are categorically exempt:
(a) Construction which consists of construction
and location of single, new facilities or
structures and installation of new equip-
ment and facilities including but not limited
to:
(1). Single family residences not in conjun-
tion with the building of two or more such units.
(2). Motels, apartments, and duplexes designed
for not more than four dwelling units if not in
conjunction with the building of two or more such
structures.
(3). Stores, offices, and restaurants if designed
for an occupant load of 20 persons or less, if not
in conjunction with the building of two or more
such structures.
(4). Water main, sewage, electrical, gas and other
utility extensions of reasonable length to serve
such construction.
(5). Accessory (appurtenant) structures including
garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences.
Z� (6). Minor private alterations in the condition of
d, land, water and /or vegetation, including but not limited
to grading on land with a slope of less than 10 per-
cent, provided that such land is not located in a
►� Water Course (WC) or Flood Plain (FP) Zone, or in an
officially designated (by Federal, State, County or
City action) scenic area or in officially mapped areas
of severe geologic hazard.
(7). Minor alterations in land use limitations, in=
cluding but not limited to:
(a) Minor lot line adjustments.
(b) Setback variances for single - family
dwellings in any R -1 Zone.
(c) Issuance of minor encroachment permits
as determined by the Public Works Depart-
ment.
Section 4: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS - DATA - For, those applications
to any City board, commission, department, division or agency for any permit,right
privilege or other entitlement not found to be exempt in Section 3 of this resolu-
tion, the applicant shall provide data as required by the City of Beaumont to
prepare an environmental assessment.
Section 5: PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.
A. Applicants for parcel map or subdivision map approval shall com-
plete an environmental information form to be provided by the Planning Department
and submit the completed form to said department not later than twenty -five (25)
days prior to the filing of an application.
B. Applicants for all private projects requiring City approval,
other than subdivision and parcel maps or projects specifically exempted by
Section 3 of this resolution shall complete an environmental information form
and submit the completed form to the City department having original jurisdic-
tion over the project at the time of application.
C. Following submission of the completed environmental information
form the department having original jurisdiction over the permit shall complete
an Environmental Assessment. The Environmental Assessment for all projects,
except those requiring conditional use permit, variance or zoning amendment
approval, shall be completed by the department as early as possible in order
that the Planning Comm-ssion may make its determination no later than fifteen
(15) days prior to the date the applicant proposes to file an application
with the department having jurisdiction over the project.
47®
D. An Environmental Assessment for a conditional use permit, variance,
new zoning application or rezoning application shall be completed by the Plan-
ning Department and said Assessment shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission
concurrently with the hearing on the application.
Section 6: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION
A. The Planning Commission shall review all private projects re-
quiring City approval except those projects exempted by Section 3 of this res-
olution, conditional use permits, variances, new zoning applications or rezoning
applications.
B. Based on data provided by the applicant and the completed
Environmental Assessment, the Planning Commission shall determine whether
the project may have a significant effect on the environment.
C. Should the Planning Commission determine that the project will
not have a significant effect on the environment, an Exemption Declaration
shall be prepared by the department having jurisdiction over the project and
filed with the Clerk of the County of Riverside not later than five (5) days
following the date upon which the Planning Commission announces its decision.
Such declaration shall include a description of the project as proposed and a
finding that the project will not have a significant effect upon the environment.
No earlier than fifteen (15) days following the Planning Commission findings,
the applicant may file an application with the Planning Department for routine
processing with the Planning Commission finding a part of the record of the
application
D. For all other projects reviewed by the Planning Commission, an
Exemption Declaration shall be prepared and filed as in Section 6 (D) within
five (5) days following the Planning Commission's decision. Project applicants
may secure the necessary permit(s) from the department issuing such permits no
earlier than ten (10) days subsequent to the filing of such declaration.
E. Should the Planning Commission find that there may be a significant
effect on the environment upon reviewing an application for any project subject
to its review, and EIR shall be prepared and processed in accordance with the
procedures outlined in Sections 8 through 11 of this resolution.
1■1r
F. In cases where the environmental finding of the Planning Com-
mission on a private project is not by a unanimous vote of the Commission on
a private project is not by a unanimous vote of the Commission, any member of
the Planning Commission may request within fifteen (15) days that the City
Council review the Commission's action thereon.
G. Any person, including a City officer, aggrieved or affected by any
decision of the Planning Commission may appeal to the City Council within fifteen
(15) days after the date upon which the Commission announces its decision. An
appeal shall be filed in writing with the Planning Department and by concurrent-
ly paying to said department a fee established by City Council resolution. The
appeal fee shall be waived in the case of an appeal by a City officer. The
written appeal shall set forth the grounds upon which the appeal is based. The
City Council shall consider the appeal within fifteen (15) days after receipt of
the written appeal and the filing fee, and the City Council shall affirm, modify
or reverse the decision of the Planning Commission.
H. Should the City Council determine that an EIR is not required,
the City department having jurisdiction over the project shall prepare an
Exemption Declaration and a Notice of Determination and file such with the Clerk
of the County of Riverside not later than five (5) working days subsequent to
City Council action.
I. Should the City Council, upon appeal, determine that an EIR
shall be prepared, the Planning Department, after receipt of the completed
Environmental Analysis from the applicant, shall prepare and process such
report in accordance with the procedures outlined in Sections 8 through 11
of this resolution.
471,
Section 7: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION
A. The Planning Commission shall review applications for all condition-
al use permits, variances and changes of zone, except those exempted by Section 3
of this resolution, for possible environmental effects.
B. Based on data provided by the applicant and.the completed Environ-
mental Assessment, the Planning Commission shall, at the time fo the hearing on
the application, determine whether the project may have a significant effect on
the environment.
C. Should the Planning Commission find that the project will not have
• significant effect on the environment, such environmental finding shall become
• permanent part of the record of the application.
D. Immediately following a determination by the Planning Commission
that a project will not have a significant effect on the environment, an Exemp-
tion Declaration shall be prepared by the Planning Department and filed with the
Clerk of the County of Riverside not later than five (5) days following the date
upon which the Commission announces its decision.
E. Should the Planning Commission find that the project may have a
significant effect on the environment, the Commission may not make a determination
on the application until an Environmental Impact Report is prepared and processed
as outlined in Sections 8 through 11 of this resolution.
Q F. Any person, including a City officer, aggrieved or affected by any
decision of the Planning Commission regarding environmental considerations may
Q appeal to the City Council within fifteen (15) days after the date upon which the
Commission makes its environmental finding. An appeal shall be filed in writing
with the Planning Department and by concurrently paying to said department a fee
established by City Council resolution. The appeal fee shall be waived in the
case of an appeal by a City officer. The written appeal shall set forth the
grounds upon which the appeal is based. The City Council shall consider the
appeal within thirty (30) days after receipt of the written appeal and the
filing fee, and the City Council shall affirm, modify, or reverse the decision
of the Commission.
G. Should the City Council determine that an Environmental Impact
Report is not required, the Planning Department shall prepare an Exemption De-
claration and a Notice of Determination and file such with the Clerk of the
County of Riverside not later than five (5) working days subsequent to City
Council action.
H. Should the City Council determine that an Environmental Impact
Report is needed, either upon appeal or on its own motion, City staff shall be
directed to prepare and process an EIR in the manner prescribed in Sections 8
through 11 of this resolution.
Section 8: PREPARATION OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT.
A. A draft Environmental Impact Report is intended to supply per-
tinent environmental information about a project so that an analysis of possible
environmental effects will become part of the decision - making process.
B. An Environmental Analysis shall be completed by the applicant or
his representative and submitt to the Planning Department for an initial review.
Said review period shall not exceed five (5) working days and during this period
the Planning Department shall ascertain whether the completed Environmental An-
alysis contains adequate data from which a draft Environmental Impact Report
may be prepared by the department. If the Planning Department determines that
the Environmental Analysis lacks sufficient data, the Analysis shall be returned
to the applicant for further input as required by the Department. When the
Planning Department determines that the submitted Environmental Analysis meets
the intent of this section, the applicant shall be notified of said determination
and required to pay a fee established by City Council resolution to defray City
costs of preparing and processing the draft and the final Environmental Impact
Reports.
C. The draft Environmental Impact Report shall contain the follow-
ing: 1. Topographic Map - The location and boundaries of the pro-
posed project plotted on an appropriate topographical map.
2. A Detailed Description of the Project - Discuss the reason
for the project, its objectives, the activities associated
with its construction and /or operation, and its technical,
economic and environmental characteristics considering the
principal engineering proposals.
472
3. A Description of the Environmental Setting of the Proiect
Describe the environmental surroundings as they now exist
(before the project). Discussion should include the im-
mediate area of the project and the community -wide aspects
of the environment which surround the project area. It
shall address itself to natural and man -made features and
to the present uses of the area. Specific reference should
be made to related projects, both public and private, both
existing and planned in the area so as to examine the possible
cumulative impact of such projects.
4. Relationship of the Project to Adopted and Proposed Plans
Describe how the project relates to all City and regional
adopted and proposed general and specific plans.
5. The Boundaries of the Area which may be Significantly
Affected by the Proposed Action - Describe the general area
which may be significantly affected by the project and to
what degree that area will be affected. Include specific
examples.
6. The Environmental Impact of the Proposed Project - Describe
all environmental effects, both good and bad, both direct and
indirect, both short -term and long -term, anticipated from the
project. The description should include all significant chang-
es in the region's air, water and land resources. Include
in this discussion any significant changes in land use which
may occur as a result of the project.
7. Any Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot Be Avoided if
the Proposal is Implemented - Describe all significant effects
which cannot be reduced in severity or which can be reduced
in severity or which can be reduced to an acceptable level
but not eliminated. Those effects which cannot be reduced
without considering an alternative project or project design
shall be described in detail.
8. Mitigating Measures Porposed to Minimize the Environmental
Effects - Describe mitigating measures such as design or con-
struction features that have been included in the project to
reduce significant environmental effects to an acceptable
level and the basis for considering these levels acceptable.
9. Alternative to the Proposed Project - Alternative kinds of
projects or locations which have been considered as possible
means of attaining the objectives of the project shall be MW
discussed. The alternatives of No project shall always be
evaluated.
10. The Relationship Between Local Short -Term Uses of Man's
Environment and the Maintenance and Enhancement of Long -Term
Productivity - Discuss the reasons why the proposed action is
believed by the sponsor to be justified now, rather than re-
serving a long -term option for other alternatives. In addi-
tion, describe the cumulative and long -term effects of the
proposed project which adversely affect the state of the
environment giving special attention to impacts which narrow
the range of beneficial uses of the environment or pose long-
term risks to public health and safety.
11. Any Irreversible Environmental Changes Which Would Occur if
the Proposed Project is Implemented - Discuss whether the
project will enhance or inhibit anticipated future uses of
the project area and its surroundings. Any irretrievable and
significant commitments of resources to a project shall be
evaluated to assure that such current consumption is justified.
12. The Growth - Inducing Impact of the Proposed Project - Discuss the
type(s) of new development that would be encouraged as a re-
sult of the project either adjacent to the project site or in
other areas of the community, and the effect that such devel-
opment might have on the community, in terms of economic
or population growth, either directly or indirectly.
13. Organization and Persons Consulted - List all Federal, State rr
or local agencies and other organizations and private indiv-
iduals consulted in preparing the draft Environmental Impact
Report.
D. The Planning Department shall prepare the draft Environmental Impact
Report, based on the submitted Environmental Analysis and other pertinent data as
required, within twenty -five (25) working days after acceptance of the completed
Environmental Analysis and the required processing fee.
4T3
Section 9: REVIEW OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS
A. Following completion of the draft EIR, but prior to copies being
sent out for review, a Notice of Completion stating that the draft Environmental
Impact Report has been completed shall be filed with the Secretary for the Re-
sources Agency of California.
B. Subsequent to filing the Notice of Completion, the Planning De-
partment shall submit for review copies of the draft EIR to all local agencies
which may be affected by the environmental effects of the proposed project.
C. Reviewers should focus on the sufficiency of the draft EIR in
discussing possible impacts upon the environment, the ways in which adverse effects
might be minimized, and possible alternatives to the project.
D. All agencies reviewing the draft EIR shall be requested to return
all pertinent comments to the Planning Department within thirty (30) days of
notification unless a written extension of time is requested and granted by the
Planning Commission. Such comments shall be evaluated and a response prepared
by the Planning Department within fifteen (15) days following the formal close
of the review period.
E. All draft EIR's shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission at
k1` a public hearing not less than fifteen (15) days nor more than thirty (30) days
r--+ following the close of the draft EIR review period. The Planning Commission
shall evaluate the sufficiency of the draft EIR as outlined in Section 8 C
above and shall make its finding on the project application based on the draft
It
EIR, comments received during the review period and subsequent response, other
pertinent data filed with the application, and testimony given at the time of
the hearing.
F. Any person, including a City officer, aggrieved or affected by
any decision of the Planning Commission regarding the draft EIR and accompanying
data may appeal to the City Council within ten (10) days after the date upon
which the Commission announces its decision. An appeal shall be filed in writing
with the Planning Department and by concurrently paying to said department a fee
established by City Council resolution. The appeal fee shall be waived in the
case of an appeal by a City officer. The written appeal shall set forth the
grounds upon which the appeal is based.
The City Council shall consider the appeal within thirty (30) days of
receipt of the letter of appeal and the filing fee, and after considering the
contents of the final EIR, shall affirm, modify or reverse the decision of the
Planning Commission.
Section 10: PREPARATION OF A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT.
A. Following the above public hearing, the Planning Department shall
prepare the final EIR.
B. The final EIR shall contain all of the information outlined in
Section 8 C as well as the following sections:
1. Comments - In summary or verbatim, those comments received from
the Planning Commission and local agencies.
2. Response - After an evaluation of all comments, the response of
the Planning Department to the significant environmental issues
raised in the review process, especially to those recommendations
and objectives which are at variance with those outlined in the
draft EIR. Such issues shall be addressed in detail giving
reasons why specific comments and suggestions were not accepted
and relating factors of major importance warranting an override
of the suggestion.
Section 11. REVIEW OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS.
A. The final EIR shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission for
adoption. The Planning Commission may adopt the final EIR as presented or order
that it be modified in accordance with the ultimate determination of the commission.
B. The Planning Department shall prepare a Notice of Determination
and file such with the Clerk of the County of Riverside not later than five (5)
working days subsequent to the action taken by the Planning Commission.
ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by
the City Clerk this 4th day of April, 1973.
Mayor of ity of Beaumont
ATTEST:
I
Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J. C. CONLEY, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1973 -9 was duly passed and adopted at
a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont duly held on the
4th day of April, 1973, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder
NOES:
ABSENT:
WITNESS MY HAND and the official seal of the City of Beaumont,
this 4th day of April, 1973. -)
(SEAL)
RESOLUTION NO. 1973 -10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A FEE
SCHEDULE FOR PROCESSING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORTS
WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Beaumont on April 4, 1973,
adopted Resolution No. 1973 -9 entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Beaumont, California, Adopting Criteria and Procedures for the Evaluation
of Projects and the Preparation of Environmental Impact Reports for Private Projects
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended by Statutes
1972, Chapter 1154 ", which resolution provides that fees be set by resolution of the
City Council for processing Environmental Impact Reports;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Beaumont that the following schedule of fees is hereby established pursuant to the
provisions of Resolution No. 1973 -9:
Actual costs incurred by the various departments of the City of
Beaumont together with a fifteen percent (15 %) charge for administrative costs
incurred by the City of Beaumont.
Passed and adopted this 4th day of April, 1973.
Mayor of Cit of Beaumont
Im
VW
d'
4T5
ATTEST:
Cit
STATE Of CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J. C. CONLEY, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1973 -10 was duly passed and adopted at
a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont duly held on the
4th day of April, 1973, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder
NOES:
ABSENT:
WITNESS MY HAND and the official seal of the City of Beaumont,
this 4th day of April, 1973.
(SEAL)
Minutes of Regular Meeting
held April 9, 1973
Y ERK, CITY OF BEA T
Beaumont, California
April 9, 1973
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers of the City Hall, April 9, 1973 with Mayor Albert Haskell presiding.
A moment of silent prayer was held for the invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the following
Councilmen present: Councilman Haskell, Rodeman, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder.
Present: 5
Absent: None
There being no objections to the minutes of the Regular Meeting held March 26, 1973
and the Special Meeting held April 4, 1973, the minutes will be filed as received.
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The City of Beaumont
will pay the bills as audited.
The minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting held in March were noted and filed.
On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Councilman Rodeman; The City of Beaumont
grants the request of the Building Department to set fees of Building Permits based
on $14.00 per square foot and electric fees to 20C per outlet and $2.00 permit fee.
AYES: 5
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being no objections from the Council, Mayor Haskell signed the proclamation
"Keep America Beautiful" which was requested by the Girl Scouts.
The Design Review Board criteria was discussed and Council felt more study was
warranted. City Manager Ward will obtain dates of Design Review Meetings in other
areas, Council will attend at their convenience.
476
On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Councilman Rodeman; The City of Beaumont
adopt Resolution 41973 -11, requesting the Division of Highways to revise the signing
on Route 10 and 60 east bound, from "Veile Avenue" to "Beaumont ".
AYES: 5
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City of Beaumont
will proceed with abatement of residence at 895 Massachusetts Avenue, pursuant to
Resolution 441972 -35.
AYES: 5
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Abatement to commence within thirty (30) days and be completed within ninety (90)
days.
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City of Beaumont
accepts bids for demolition of buildings located at 37860 Highway 60, pursuant to
Resolution 41972 -35, and awards same to; Marvin Biggerls Excavation Company, at a
bid of $1,190.00.
AYES: 5
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Councilman Rodeman; The City of Beaumont,
after the second reading, passed and adopted Ordinance 4443.
AYES: 5
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The City of
Beaumont accepts bids for major trimming of Parks and Parkway and awards contract
to Banning- Beaumont Tree Service, whose bid was $1,696.00
AYES: 5
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Councilman Rodeman; The City of Beaumont
will purchase pump for water and emergency fire vehicle, at the cost of $737.10.
AYLS: 5
EOE; : None
On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City of Beaumont
adopts Resolution 1973 -12; backing the City of Perris request for State allocated
funds appropriated for park and recreation facility.
AYES: 5
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
On motion of Councilman Haskell seconded by Councilman Rodeman; The City of Beaumont
will bill the State and Federal Government for out of pocket costs for studies and
expenses for sewer grant applications. Letters to be sent to President, Governor and
Senator.
AYES: 5
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
On motion of Councilman Rodeman, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The City of Beaumont
authorize the amount of $4.00 per meeting for reserve matrons attending monthly train-
ing meetings.
AYES: 5
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Date of next regular study session set for Friday, April 20, 1973 at 4:00 p.m. in U0
the City Managers office at City Hall.
There being no further business, Mayor Haskell adjourned this meeting at 9:45 p.m.
i
Albert Haske,.�
Mayor of City of Beaumont
J. C. Conl
City Clerk
t.
Q
RESOLUTION NO. 1973 -11
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,
CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
TO REVISE THE SIGNING ON ROUTES 10 AND 60 EASTBOUND APPROACHES
TO BEAUMONT FROM "VEILE AVE" TO " BEAUMONT"
WHEREAS, said signing originally conveyed the "Beaumont message and
was revised to " Veile Avenue" at City's request and
WHEREAS, Veile Avenue at one time was intended to serve a large
industrial center and
WHEREAS, Development of this industrial center is not within the
forseeable future and
WHEREAS, Veile Avenue is a short cross street with little importance,
is generally unknown, and has no significance for motorists entering Beaumont,
now therefore
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Beaumont requests
that the name " Veile Avenue" be removed from signing facing eastbound traffic on
Route 10 and Route 60 and the "Beaumont" message be restored.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Beaumont
requests that the "Beaumont Next Three Exits" on Highways 60 and 10 remain in
place and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk of the City of Beaumont
.forward a copy of this Resolution to the State Division of Highways for their
handling.
Mayor of City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
City
STATE OF'CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J.C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that the foregoing Resolution No. 1973 -11 was duly passed and adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont duly held on the 9th day of
April, 1973, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Yoder, Valdivia, Haskell, Rodeman and Ochoa
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
WITHNESS MY HAND and the official seal of the City of Beaumont, this 9th
day of April, 1973. 1--2,
(SEAL)
Clerk, City of -'B�e400nt
t
r:.
0 w
S
RESOLUTION 1973 -12
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA REQUESTING THE ASSISTANCE
OF THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS: The allocations for recreation facilities at Lake Perris
have been made and
WHEREAS: The Legislature of the State of California has appropriated
funds under the Budget Act of 1973 for said facilities
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: The City Council of the City
of Beaumont, California requests that the contracts for
facilities, mentioned hereinabove, be let and the facilities
be completed at the earliest possible date
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, The City Clerk of the City of Beaumont forward
a copy of this resolution to the offices of Assemblyman Ray
Seely for his consideration.
a
Mayor of the City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
Ci Clerk
TATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J. C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 1973 -12 was duly passed and adopted
at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont duly held on
the 9th day of April, 1973, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Yoder, Valdivia, Haskell, Rodeman and Ochoa
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
WITNESS MY HAND and the official seal of the City of Beaumont,
this 9th day of April, 1973.
(SEAL)
t lerk Cit of� nt
Y
t�
r-+
d'
ORDINANCE NO. 443
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 282 - REZONING CERTAIN
PARCELS OF PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF BEAUMONT FROM R -1 TO R -A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Pursuant to the recommendations of the Planning Commission
of the City of Beaumont, that certain property situated in the City of Beaumont,
County of Riverside, State of California, is hereby rezoned from R -1 to R -A for
property described as
Lots 2 and 3, Block 22 EXCEPT for the Easterly 221' of lots 2 and 3;
as shown by the amended map of the town of Beaumont on file in book 6,
pages 16 and 17 of maps, San Bernardino County Records, and the zoning
map of the City of Beaumont shall be altered in accordance with dictates
of this Ordinance.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of
this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published once in the Record -
Gazette, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Beaumont, and thirty
(30) days after its adoption, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect.
Introduced at a regular meeting held March 26, 1973.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of April 1973.
Mayor of City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
C C rk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J. C. Conely, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that the foregoing Ordinance No. 443 was duly passed and adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont duly held on the 26 day
of March 1973, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Yoder, Valdivia, Haskell and Rodeman
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Ochoa
WITNESS MY HAND and the official seal of the City of Beaumont, this 9th
day of April, 1973
6;y *erk, i ty of Be m t
(SEAL)
479
Minutes of Regular Meeting
held April 23, 1973
Beaumont, Calif.
April 23, 1973
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers of the City Hall, April 23, 1973, with Mayor Albert Haskell
presiding.
A moment of silent prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the follow-
ing Councilmen present: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder.
Present: 4
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
There being no objections to the minutes of the Regular Meeting held April
9, 1973, the minutes will be filed as received.
On motion of Councilmam Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The City of
Beaumont will pay the bills as audited.
The minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting held April 12, 1973, were
noted and filed.
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Yoder; Council grants
the request for Street Light at 713 Michigan Avenue
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Haskell, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; Ordinance
#444 pass it's first reading.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
Mayor Haskell signed the Proclamation designating the month of May, 1973
as Correct Posture Month. rr
On Motion of Councilman Valdivia, seconded by Councilman Yoder, Council
grant the request of the City Manager to use Statement of Exemption for
persons working for wages only - re; Business Licenses Ordinance #333.
Ayes. 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Valdivia, seconded by Councilman Yoder, Council grant
the Pony League request for 1973 season, with the following exceptions:
Cancel the June 15th game. Vacate the field by 8:00 p.m. on Mondays and
Thursdays. A letter will be sent to Mr. Carlson notifying him of these
stipulations, to be signed and returned to the City.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; Council grants
requests of the 20 -30 Club regarding license and permit fees for the 1973
Cherry Festival.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
Letters will be sent to surrounding City Councils inviting them to the Cherry UW
Festival Parade.
On Motion of Councilman Haskell, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City
Attorney will attend the LAFC Meeting April 25, 1973.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
d"
Q
On motion of Councilman Valdivia, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; Council will
grant Little League permission to hold a parade on Saturday, April 28, 1973.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; Persons desiring
to submit a design for the City Seal may do so prior to the May 14, 1973
Council Meeting. Mr. Taylor,Conley, Ward and Synkowski each donated $10.00
in addition to Council prize of $25.00 to be awarded the winning design.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
Date of next regular study session set for Friday, May 11, 1973 at 4:00 p.m.
in City Managers office at City Hall.
There being no further business, Mayor Haskell adjourned this meeting at
9:45 p.m.
Albert
Mayor
J.C. Conle4�
City Cler
Minutes of Regular Meeting
held May 14, 1973
May 14, 1973
Beaumont, Calif.
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers of the City Hall, May 14, 1973, with Mayor Albert Haskell
presiding.
A moment of silent prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the following
Councilmen present: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Yoder.
Present: 4
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
There being no objections to the minutes of the Regular Meeting held April 23,
1973, the minutes will be filed as received.
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The City of
Beaumont will pay the bills as audited.
The minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting held April 25, 1973, were noted
and filed.
On motion of Councilman Haskell, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; Ordinance #444
pass its second reading and be adopted. Ordinance #444 to follow.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Valdivia, Mr. Oliver
Elmore will be granted a use permit, terms to be drawn up by the City Manager
and the City Attorney, for the fee fo $24.00 per year. (one employee).
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
482
On motion of Councilman Haskell, seconded by Councilman Yoder; Council adopts
Resolution #1973 -13, Environmental Quality Act Provisions Re: Public Projects.
Resolution to follow.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Haskell, seconded by Councilmna Ochoa; The resignation of
Councilman Walter Rodeman is regretfully accepted. Council abstains from-appoint-
ment at this time, motion by Councilman Haskell, second by Councilman Yoder.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Rodeman
On motion of Councilman Haskell, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The resignation of
Councilman Walter Rodeman is regretfully accepted. Council abstains from appoint-
ment at this time, motion by Councilman Haskell, second by Councilman Yoder.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Yoder, Council adopts
Resolution #1973 -14, to authorize purchasing by State Agencies on behalf of the
City of Beaumont. Resolution to follow.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
The request of Poundmaster for updating of Ordinance #382 (Animal Control) was
tabled to the June 25th, 1973 meeting.
The Pony -Colt League Field will be vacated by 8:30 p.m. on Monday and Thursday.
Council selected the City Seal designed by Don Moorehouse, 122 E. 12th Street,
Beaumont.
Date of next regular study session set for Thursday, May 24, 1973, at 4:00 p.m.
in the City Managers office at City Hall.
There being no further business, Mayor Haskell adjourned this meeting at 9:45
p.m.
Mayor
ORDINANCE NO. 444
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 168 BY ADDING CERTAIN
PROVISIONS THERETO AND REPEALING ANY OTHER ORDINANCES OR
PORTIONS THEREOF IN CONFLICT THEREWITH.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I: Ordinance No. 168 as respecting the Planning
Commission of the City of Beaumont is hereby amended by adding
thereto the following.
a. Term of membership to the commission will be four years.
b. Members shall reside within the corporate City limits of
the City of Beaumont.
C. If a current member of the commission moves outside of the
corporate boundaries of the City of Beaumont, said member
may complete the remaining portion of the four year term
if the action is approved by the majority vote of the Plann-
ing Commission.
d. The chairman of the Planning Commission shall submit to
the City Council a list of candidates, approved by the
Commission, within 30 days after a vacancy occures.
a
Q
s
L �
e. Replacement of members shall be by appointment of the City
Council.
SECTION 2: The above enumerated provisions, from the effective
date of this ordinance, shall be paramount to any provisions in
any other ordinance, heretofore passed and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Beaumont, anything therein contained to the
contrary notwithstanding.
SECTION 3:. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption
of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published once in
the Record - Gazette, a newspaper of general circulation in the City
of Beaumont, and thirty (30) days after this adoption, this Ordinance
shall be in full force and effect.
Introduced at a regular meeting held April 23, 1973.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of May, 1973.
i�
ayo of City 'of Beaumont
ATTEST:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
SS
I, J.C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that the foregoing Ordinance No. 444 was duly passed and adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont duly held ont he 14 th day
of May 1973, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Haskell, Yoder, Valdivia and Ochoa
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Rodeman
WITNESS MY HAND and the official sea o the City of Beaumont, this
14th day of May, 1973.
(SEAL)
erk, City o on
RESOLUTION No. 1973 -13
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING CRITERIA AND
PROCEDURES FOR THE EVALUATION OF PROJECTS AND
THE PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS
FOR PUBLIC PROJECTS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970, AS AMENDED
BY STATUTES 1972, CHAPTER 1154.
WHEREAS the California Legislature adopted Assembly Bill 889 which was
signed by the Governor on December 5, 1972, providing for the adoption of guide-
lines by all public agencies to establish criteria and procedures for the evalua-
tion of projects and the preparation of Environmental Impact Reports pursuant to
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Beaumont as
follows:
The following criteria and procedures are hereby adopted pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. In accordance with
those guidelines attached hereto marked Exhibit A hereby referred to by this
reference incorporated herein as those fully set forth at length.
ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the
City Clerk this 14th day of May, 1973.
(SEAL) y
ATTEST: ,
Citv ner -itV--of Beaumont
Md-yU_r-__tity'ot Beaumont
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR PUBLIC PROJECTS
1. INTRODUCTION
The California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 requires local
governments to prepare Environmental Impact Reports for all projects
they intend to carry out which any have a significant effect on the
environment. In addition, a previously adopted City Council Resolu-
tion requires that an assessment of significant environmental effects
be a routine part of actions taken or contemplated by every City depart-
ment, board commission or agency.
The attached procedures, based on guidelines recently adopted by the
state Resources Agency, will serve as a guide for the preparation, sub-
mission and review of Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact
Reports for public projects initiated and /or undertaken by the City of
Beaumont.
II. DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of these procedures, the following words and phrases
shall have the meaning respectively ascribed to them.
A. Approval - The decision by the City Council to commit the City
to a definite course of action in regard to a project proposed
to be carried out by any City Department. The time at which
such commitment is made is as follows:
1. A decision to acquire property for development with
public facilities at a later date.
2. The bid award date on a public construction project.
3. The introduction of an ordinance to enact or amend
zoning ordinances.
4. The adoption of a resolution to adopt a General Plan
Element or to adopt a specific plan based on the
General Plan.
B. Categorical Exemptions - Those public projects determined by the
Planning Commission to have no significant effect on the environ-
ment and therefore exempt from the requirements for the preparation
of an Environmental Impact Report. N'
C. Environment - The total conditions existing in an area which will
be affected by a proposed project including land, air, water, minerals,
flora, fauna, ambient noise, objects of historic or aesthetic signifi-
cance, social and economic.
D. Environmental Assessment - A formal evaluation process to determine
whether a proposed project may have a significant effect on the environ-
ment.
E. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) - A report which identifies and
analyzes the environmental effects, both positive and negative of a
proposed project.
1. Draft EIR - A report containing the elements described in Section
VI of these procedures.
2. Final EIR - An EIR containing the elements described in Section VI
of these procedures as well as any comments resulting from the
public review of the draft EIR and responses of the responsible City
Department to such comments.
F. Exemption Declaration (Negative Declaration) - A written announcement
filed with the Clerk of the County of Riverside indicating that a
proposed project, although not categorically exempt, will have no
significant effect on the quality of the environment if undertaken and MW
therefore does not require the prepartion of an EIR.
G. Notice of Completion - A brief written notice filed with the State
Secretary of Resources subsequent to the completion of a draft EIR
and prior to the distribution of copies of the draft for public re-
view and /or comment. Such notice shall include a brief description of
the project, its proposed location and an address where copies of the
draft EIR are available.
H. Notice of Determination - A brief, written notice filed with the
Clerk of the County of Riverside subsequent to the Planning Commission's
decision to approve or disapprove a project. Such notice shall include
the decision of the Planning Commission to approve or disapprove the
project, the determination of the Planning Commission whether the project
will have a significant effect on the environment and whether an EIR
has been prepared in accordance with Sections VI through IX of these
procedures.
I. Project - The whole of any action undertaken by the City resulting in
a physical impact on the environment, directly or indirectly.
1. Project includes:
(a) an activity directly undertaken by any City department
including but not limited to land acquisition, public
works construction and related activities, clearing or
grading of land, and improvements to existing public
structures;
(b) enactment of and amendments to zoning ordinances and the
adoption of a General Plan or Elements thereof;
(c) adoption of specific (precise) plans based on the General
Plan.
2. Project does not include:
(a) anything specifically exempted by State law or these procedures;
(b) continuing administrative or maintenance activities;
(c) emergency repairs to public service facilities;
(d) the submittal of proposals to a vote of the people of the City.
J. Significant Environmental Effects - Those effects associated with a
substantial adverse negative impact on the environment, to include
but not limited to those actions which:
1. involve a large -scale alteration of existing environmental components:
air, water, land configurations, plant or animal food chains and
habitats, and the like;
2. could create substantial alteration of the physical, chemical or
biological properties of the air, water or land in a manner con-
trary to the promotion of the health, safety or welfare of a sub-
stantial number of persons, or to the balance of an ecological re-
source;
3. impact to a measurable degree upon rare or endangered plant or
animal species;
4. could cause substantial interference with the movement of any resident
or migratory fish or wildlife species;
5. may be subject to major geologic hazard or create substantial flood-
ing, erosion or siltation;
6. involve disruption of existing neighborhoods or communities;
7. could do irrovocable harm to the aesthetic amenities of an area
or resource;
B. could substantially change existing uses of an area or resource;
9. disrupt or alter the appearance or surroundings of a historical or
archaeological site;
10. are in conflict with City- adopted environmental plans and goals.
In every case where any of the following conditions are found to exist as
a result of the project, the project will be found to have a significant
effect on the environment and an EIR will be required:
(a) Impacts which have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment or _urtail the range of the environment.
(b) Impacts which achieve short term to the disadvantag of long-
term environmental goals.
(c) Impacts for the project which are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable.
(d) The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly.
Significant effects include environmental consequences of both a primary
and secondary nature. Primary effects (e.g,.-.heavy grading during con-
struction of a new reservoir) should not be given greater consideration
than secondary effects (e.g. changes in land use which may occur as a
result of the project).
A I
III. CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS - The following public projects or actions have
been found by the City Council to have no significant effect on the en-
vironment and therefore will not require completion of an Environmental
Assessment:
1. Operation, repair, maintenance or minor alteration of existing
public structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topo-
graphical features, involving negligable or no expansion of use
beyond that previously existing, including but not limited to:
(a) Existing public utility facilities;
(b) Work within the existing public right -of -way;
(c) Restoration or rehabilitation of deteriorated or damaged
publicly owned structures, facilities or mechanical equipment
to meet current standards of public health and safety, unless
it is determined that the damage was substantial and resulted
from an environmental hazard such as an earthquake, landslide �r
or flood;
(d) Additions to existing publicly owned structures provided that
the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50
percent of the floor area of the structure or 2,500 square feet,
whichever is less.
(e) Maintenance of water supply reservoirs;
(f) Demolition and removal of publicly owned buildings and related
structures except where they are of historical, archaeological
consequence as officially designated by Federal, State, County,
or City.
2. Replacement or reconstruction of existing publicly owned structures
and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same
site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same
purpose and capacity as the structure replaced, including but not
limited to the replacement or reconstruction of City buildings and
schools to provide earthquake resistant structures which do not in-
crease capacity more than 50 percent.
*3. Construction and location of single new facilities or structures and
the installation of new equipment and facilities including, but not
limited to, extension of public utility facilities in existing public —
right -of -way, provided that such extension does not exceed 500 feet in
overall length.
M
. Minor public alterations in the condition of land, water and /or vegeta-
tion, including but not limited to:
(a) Grading on land with a slope of less than ten (10) percent, pro-
vided that such land is not located in a Water Course (WC) or
Flood Plain (FP) Zone, and officially designated (Federal, State
or local governmental action) scenic area, or in officially mapped
areas of severe geologic hazard;
(b) Filling of earth into previously excavated land with material
compatible with the natural features of the site.
5. Actions taken to assure the maintenance, restoration or enchancement
of a natural resource.
6. Actions taken to assure the maintenance, restoration, enchancement or
protection of the environment, including but not limited to, construction
of storm drains and similar facilities designed to protect the environment
within existing public rights -of -way.
7. Sale of surplus City -owned property, except real property.
8. Basic data collection, research, experimental management and resource
evaluation activities which do not result in a serious or major dis-
turbance to an environmental resource. These may be for strictly in-
formation gathering purposes, or as a part of a study leading to an
action which the City has not yet approved, adopted or funded.
9. Emergency projects, exempt from the requirement of Environmental
Assessment:
(a) Maintenance, repair, restoration, demolition or replacement of
public property or facilities damaged or destroyed as a result
of a disaster in a disaster stricken area in which a state of
emergency has been proclaimed by the Governor pursuant to Section
7(commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1, Title 2 of the
Government Code;
(b) Emergency repairs to public service facilities necessary to main-
tain service;
(c) Projects undertaken as immediate action necessary to prevent or
mitigate an emergency.
* These items are qualified by consideration of the project's location - -a project
that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may, in a par-
ticularly sensitive environment, be significant. Moreover, all projects and actions
listed above are inapplicable when the sumulative impact of successive projects of
the same type, in the same place, over time is significant. The department having
jurisdiction over the project shall make the determination regarding the exemption
status of the project under these Sections III. 3 and 4. Any person aggrieved of
affected by the decision of a City department regarding the exempt status of a
project may appeal to the City Council in the manner prescribed in Section V. A.7.
NOTE: ALL DEPARTMENTS ARE CAUTIONED THAT THE PROCESSING OF PUBLIC PROJECTS UNDER
THE FOLLOWING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURES WILL REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF ONE
HUNDRED TWENTY (120) DAYS IF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IS REQUIRED TO
BE PREPARED. THIS TIME FRAME ASSUMES THAT THE ACTUAL PREPARATION OF THE
IMPACT REPORT WILL REQUIRE NOT MORE THAN FORTY (40) DAYS.
IV. PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS FOR ALL PUBLIC PROJECTS NOT SPECIFI-
CALLY EXEMPTED BY SECTION III OF THESE PROCEDURES.
A. Procedure for public projects listed in the current Capital Improvements
Program (1971 -72 - - - 1976 -77):
1. Each project proposed to be undertaken in the 1972 -73 fiscal year of
the current Capital Improvement Program shall require an Environmental
Assessment (Appendix A). The City department having jurisdiction over
the project shall complete the Environmental Assessment prior to the
expenditure of funds to acquire property or the awarding of a construc-
tion bid as the case may be.
2. Each project proposed to be undertaken in the 1973 -74 fiscal year of
the current Capital Improvement Program (1972 -73 - -- 1976 -77) shall re-
quire an Environmental Assessment to be prepared by the City department
having jurisdiction over the project. The Environmental Assessment
shall be completed at least 120 days prior to the estimated date of
expenditure of funds to acquire property or the awarding of a construc-
tion bid as the case may be.
B. Procedure for public projects to be listed in the forthcoming 1972- 73- -1977-
78 Capital Improvement Program and all subsequent Capital Improvement Pro-
grams:
Upon City Council approval of a project's listing in the third year of
the City's six -year Capital Improvement Program, the City department having
jurisdiction over the project shall complete an Environmental Assessment.
The Assessment shall be completed at least 120 days prior to the estimated
date of expenditure of funds to acquire property or the awarding of a con-
struction bid as the case may be.
C. Procedure for public land acquisition and construction projects not included
in any Capital Improvement Program:
All those public land acquisition and construction projects not included
in any Capital Improvement Program shall require an Environmental Assess-
ment prepared by the City department having jurisdiction over the project.
The Assessment should be completed as early as possible in the planning
stages of the project but in no case less than 120 days prior to the estim-
ate date of expenditure of funds to acquire property or the awarding of
a construction bid as the case may be.
D. Procedure for public projects already completed or currently under con-
struction.
Public projects for which actual construction has been completed
or has already begun shall not require an Environmental Assessment.
Future modifications to the original project, however, will require
completion of an Environmental Assessment by the initiating City
department for the proposed modifications only.
E. Procedure for the enactment of an amendment to zoning ordinances and
adoption of General Plan Elements:
The Planning Department shall prepare an Environmental Assessment on
all proposed enactments of and amendments to zoning ordinances and
the adoption of General Plan Elements as part of the required report
therein.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW FOR PUBLIC PROJECTS
A. Environmental Assessments completed by a City Department other than
the Planning Department.
1. Completed Environmental Assessments shall be forwarded to the Plan-
ning Department for an analysis by the Department and review by the
Planning Commission.
2. Fifteen (15) copies of the completed Environmental Assessment shall
be forwarded to the Planning Commission not less than ten (10) work-
ing days prior to the date the initiating City department requests
the Planning Commission to review the Assessment. A schedule of
Planning Commission meeting dates is attached.
3. Should the Planning Commission find that the project will not have
a significant effect on the environment, the City department having
jurisdiction over said project shall complete an Exemption Declara-
tion (Appendix B) and file said declaration with the Riverside
County Clerk not later than five (5) days after the date upon which
the Commission announces its decision.
4. Should the Planning Commission find that the project may have a
significant effect on the environment, the Commision shall direct
the initiating City department to prepare an Environmental Impact
Report and process same in accordance with Sections VI through IX
of these procedures.
5. All actions by the Planning Commission regarding Environmental
Assessments for public projects shall be forwarded to the City
Council for ratification along with copies of the completed Envi-
ronmental Assessment.
6. The City Council may, on its own motion, elect to review any en-
vironmental finding of the Planning Commission and may affirm,
reverse or modify said finding.
7. Any person, including a City officer, aggrieved or affected by any
decision of the Planning Commission may appeal to the City Council
within fifteen (15) days after the date upon which the Commission
announces its decision. An appeal shall be filed in writing with
the Planning Department and by concurrently paying to said depart-
ment a fee of $25.00. The $25.00 appeal fee shall be waived in the
case of an appeal by a City officer. The written appeal shall set
forth the grounds upon which the appeal is based. The City Council
shall consider the appeal within fifteen (15) days after receipt
of the written- appeal and the filing fee, and the City Council
shall affirm, modify or reverse the decision of the Planning Comm-
ission.
8. Should the City Council determine that an Environmental Impact Report
is not required, the City department having jurisdiction over the
project shall complete an Exemption Declaration and a Notice of
Determination (Appendix C). Both the Exemption Declaration and the
Notice of Determination shall be filed with the Riverside County
Clerk within five (5) days subsequent to City Council action.
9. Should the City Council determine that an Environmental Impact Re-
port is required to be prepared, the City Department having juris-
diction over the project shall prepare such in accordance with
Section VI through IX of these procedures.
B. Environmental Assessments prepared by the Planning Department:
1. The Planning Commission shall review all Environmental Assessments
required to be prepared by the Planning Department.
go
2. Should the Planning Commission find that the project will not
have a significant effect on the environment, the Planning De-
partment shall prepare an Exemption Declaration and file such with
the Riverside County Clerk not later than five (5) days after the
date upon which the Commission announces its decision.
3. A copy of the completed Environmental Assessment and the Exemption
Declaration shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission prior to
the Commission's hearing on the project and shall become part of
the official record of the project.
4. Following Planning Commission action on the project, the Commission's
recommendation along with the Environmental Assessment and Exemption
Declaration shall be forwarded to the City Council for ratification.
5. Should the Planning Commission find that the project may have a
significant effect on the environment, the Commission shall direct
the Planning Department to prepare an EIR in accordance with Sections
VI through IX of these procedures.
6. The City Council may, on its own motion, elect to review any environ-
mental finding of the Planning Commission and may affirm, reverse or
modify said finding.
7. Any person, including a City officer, aggrieved or affected by any
decision of the Planning Commission regarding environmental consider-
ation may appeal to the City Council within fifteen (15) days after
the date upon which the Commission makes its environmental finding.
An appeal shall be filed in writing with the Planning Department and
by concurrently paying to said department a fee of $25.00. The
$25.00 appeal fee shall be waived in the case of an appeal by a City
officer. The written appeal shall set forth the grounds upon which
the appeal is based. The City Council shall consider the appeal within
thirty (30) days after receipt of the written appeal and the filing
fee, and the City Council shall affirm, modify or reverse the decision
of the Commission.
8. Should the City Council determine that► an EIR is not required, the
Planning Department shall complete an Exemption Declaration and a
Notice of Determination and file such with the Riverside County Clerk
not later than five (5) working days subsequent to City Council action.
9. Should the City Council determine that an Environmental Impact Report
is required to be prepared, the Planning Department shall prepare
such in accordance with Section VI through IX of these procedures.
VI PREPARATION OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
A. A draft Environmental Impact Report is intended to supply pertinent
environmental information about a project so that an analysis of pos-
sible environmental effect will become part of the decision - making process.
B. The City department having jurisdiction over the project shall be respon-
sible for the preparation of the draft Environmental Report.
C. Where individual projects are, or a phased project is, to be undertaken
and where the total undertaking comprises a project with significant
environmental effects, the City department having jurisdiction over the
project must prepare a single EIR for the ultimate project. Where an
individual project is a necessary precedent for action on a larger pro-
ject, or commits the City to a larger project, with significant environ-
mental effect, an EIR must address itself to the scope of the larger
project.
D. A single EIR may be utilized to describe more than one project if such
projects are essentially the same in terms of environmental impact. An
EIR prepared for a project previously undertaken may apply to a later pro-
ject if the circumstances of the project are essentially the same.
E. The draft Environmental Impact Report shall contain the following:
1. Topographic Map - The location and boundries of the proposed project
plotted on an appropriate topographical map.
2. A Detailed Description of the Project - Discuss the reason for the
project, its objectives, the activities associated with its con-
struction and /or operation, and its technical, economic and environ-
mental characteristics considering the principal engineering proposals.
3. A Description of the Environmental Setting of the Porject - Describe
the environmental surroundings as they now exist (before the project).
Discussion should include the immediate area of the project and the
community -wide aspects of the environment which surround the project
area. It shall address itself to natural and man -made features and
to the present uses of the area. Specific reference should be made
to related projects, both public and private, both existing and
planned in the area so as to examine the possible cumulative impact
of such projects.
4. Relationship to the Project to Adopted and Proposed Plans
Describe how the project relates to all City and regional adopted
and proposed general and specific plans.
5. The Boundries of the Area Which May Be Significantly Affected by
the Proposed Action -- Describe the general area which may be
significantly affected by the project and to what degree that
area will be affected. Include specific examples.
6. The Environmental Impact of the Proposed Project -
Describe all environmental effects, both good and bad, both direct
and indirect, both short -term and long -term, anticipated from the
project. The description should include all significant changes in
the region's air, water and land resources. Include in this dis-
cussion any .significant changes in land use which may occur as a
result of the project.
7. Any Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot Be Avoided If the
Proposal Is Implemented - Describe all significant effects which
cannot be reduced in severity or which can be reduced to an accept-
able level but not eliminated. Those effects which cannot be reduced
without considering an alternative project or project design shall
be described in detail.
8. Mitigating Measures Proposed to Minimize the Environmental Effects -
Describe mitigating measures such as design or construction features
that have been included in the project to reduce significant environ-
mental effects to an acceptable level and the basis for considering
these levels acceptable.
9. Alternatives to the Proposed Project - Alternative kinds of projects
or locations which have been considered as possible or locations
which have been considered as possible means of attaining the object-
ives of the project shall be discussed. The alternatives of No Pro-
ject shall always be evaluated.
10. The Relationship Between Local Short -Term Uses of Man's Environment
and the Maintenance and Enchancement of Long Term Productivity -
Discuss the reasons why the proposed action is believed by the
sponsor to be justified now, rather than reserving a long -term option
for other alternatives. In addition, describe the cumulative and
long term effects of the proposed project which adversely affect the
state of the environment giving special attention to impacts which
narrow the range of beneficial uses of the environment or pose long-
term risks to public health or safety.
11. Any Irreversible Environmental Changes Which Would Occur If the Pro-
posed Project Is Implemented -
Discuss whether the project will enhance or inhibit anticipated future
uses of the project area and its surroundings. Any irretrievable and
significant commitments of resources to a project shall be evaluated
to assure that such current consumption is justified.
12. The Growth - Inducing Impact of the Proposed Project - Discuss the type(s)
of new development that would be encouraged as a result of the project
either adjacent to the project site or in other areas of the community,
and the effect that such development might have on the community, in
terms of economic or population growth, either directly or indirectly.
13. Organization and Persons Consulted - List all Federal, State or local
agencies and other organizations and private individuals consulted in
preparing the draft Environmental Impact Report.
VII. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS
A. At least 75 days prior to the estimated date of City Council approval
of the project, twenty -five (25) copies of the completed draft EIR
shall be forwarded to the Planning Department. The Planning Department
shall, in turn, prepare a Notice of Completion (Appendix D) and file
same with the Secretary for the Resources Agency of California.
B. Subsequent to filing the Notice of Completion, the Planning Depart-
ment shall submit, for review, copies of the draft Environmental
Impact Report to all local agencies which may be affected by the
environmental effects of the proposed projects and to any person who as
has special expertise with respect to any environmental impact in-
volved.
C. Reviewers should focus on the sufficiency of the draft EIR in dis-
cussing possible impacts upon the environment, the ways in which ad-
verse effects might be minimized, and possible alternatives to the
project.
D. All persons and /or agencies reviewing the draft EIR shall be requested
to return all pertinent comments to the Planning Department within
thirty (30) days of notification unless a written extension of time
is requested and granted by the Environmental Protection Commission.
Such comments shall be evaluated and a written response prepared by
the City department having jurisdiction over the project within fifteen
(15) days following the close of the review period.
E. The draft Environmental Impact Report shall be reviewed by the Planning
Commission at a public hearing not less than fifteen (15) days nor more
than thirty (30) days following the close of the draft EIR review
period. The Planning Commission will evaluate the sufficiency of the
draft Environmental Impact Report as outlined in Section C above and
shall make its findings on the project based on the draft Environ-
mental Impact Report, comments received during the review period
and subsequent responses and testimony given at the time of hearing.
F. Any person, including a City officer, aggrieved by a decision of the
Planning Commission regarding the draft EIR may appeal to the City
Council within ten (10) days after the date upon which the Commission
announces its decision. An appeal shall be filed in writing with the
Planning Department and by concurrently paying to said department
a fee of $50.00. The $50.00 appeal fee shall be waived in the case
of an appeal by a City officer. The written appeal shall set forth
the grounds upon which the appeal is based.
The City Council shall consider the appeal within 30 days of re-
ceipt of the letter of appeal and the filing fee and after consider-
ing the contents of the final Environmental Impact Report, shall
affirm, modify or reverse the decision of the Planning Commission.
VIII. PREPARATION OF A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
A. Following a public hearing by the Planning Commission, the City depart-
ment having jurisdiction over the project shall prepare the final
Environmental Impact Report.
B. The final Environmental Impact Report shall contain all of the inform-
ation outlined in Section VI of these procedures as well as the follow-
ing sections:
1. Comments - In summary or verbatim, those comments received from
the Planning Commission and all concerned persons and local agencies.
2. Response - After evaluation of all comments, the response of the
City department having jurisdiction over the project to the signi-
ficant environmental issues raised in the review process, especially
to those recommendations and objectives which are at variance with
those outlined in the EIR. Such issues shall be addressed in de-
tail giving reasons why specific comments and suggestions were not
accepted and relating factors of major importance warranting an
override of the suggestions.
IX. REVIEW OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS
A. The Final Environmental Impact Report shall be forwarded to the City
Council for adoption. The City Council may, on its own motion, elect
to review the finding of the Planning Commission on the final EIR
and may affirm, reverse or modify said finding.
B. The City department having jurisdiction over the project shall prepare
a Notice of Determination and file such with the Riverside County
Clerk not later than five (5) working days subsequent to the City
Council action on the final EIR.
RESOLUTION NO. 1973 -14
AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMLNT OF GENERAL SERVICES
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO PURCHASE CERTAIN
ITEMS.
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Beaumont does
hereby authorize the Office of Procurement, Department of General Services
of the State of California to purchase supplies and equipment as needed for
and on behalf of the City of Beaumont pursuant to Section 14814, Government
Code and that Jay C. Conley or J.E. Ward, City Clerk and City Manager Res-
pectively are hereby authorized and directed to sign and deliver all necessary
requests and other documents in connection therewith for and on behalf of the
City of Beaumont.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 14th day of May, 1973
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
ss
a
Ma r
0, Jay C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1973 -14 was duly adopted at
a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont, held on the
14th day of May, 1973 by the following vote:
AYES: 4
NOES: None
ABSENT:
(SEAL)
Minutes of Regular Meeting
held May 29, 1973
Beaumont, Calif.
May 29, 1973
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers of the City Hall, May 29, 1973, with Mayor Albert Haskell
presiding.
A moment of silent prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the following
Councilmen present: Councilman Haskell, Ochoa and Yoder.
Present: 3
Absent: Councilman -Valdivia
There being no objections to the minutes of the Regular Meeting held May 14,
1973, the minutes will be filed as received.
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Yoder; the City of Beaumont
will pay the bills as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Ochoa and Yoder,
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Valdivia
The minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting held May 10, 1973, were noted
and filed.
On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Councilman Ochoa, The request of
Martin Shuler for a Moving Permit is granted subject to compliance with
Ordinance #399.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Ochoa and Yoder
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Valdivia
Report on Demolition costs re: Sixth Street School Locker Rooms: Consensus
of Council is that City Manager Ward be authorized to look into the possibility
of reducing the cost of demolition of property to the school district which
said property is to be acquired by the City.
On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Council Ochoa; Mr. Cagle will
be informed by the City Manager, that a cash deposit of $3400.00 will be re-
quired prior to commencement of work on Michigan Avenue.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Ochoa and Yoder
Noes: none
Absent: Councilman Valdivia
On motion of Councilman Haskell, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The recommen-
dation of City Manager Ward re: painting of Fire Station is granted.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Ochoa and Yoder
Noes: none
Absent: Councilman Valdivia
On motion of Councilman Haske -1, seconded by Councilmna Yoder; Council accepts
the Beaumont Chamber of Commerce report Re: Portion of Lot 25 Block 115 and
requests ex- cution of Quit Claim Deed relinquishing property to the City.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Ochoa and Yoder.
Noes: none
Absent: Councilman Valdivia
Council instructed the City Clerk to notify Mr. Wilcox, Cherry Valley AARP
Chapter #90, that their request for scheduled use of Community Room in the
Civic Center will be considered by Council to be placed on the calendar.
Council instructed City Manager Ward to inform Preferred Properties inc. to
obtain further information and palnned unit construction proposal. Request
tabled until further information is presented.
Date of next regular study session set for Friday, June 8, 1973, at 4:00 p.m.
in the City Managers office at City Hall.
There being no further business, Mayor Haskell adjourned this meeting to the
City Manager's office for an executive personnel session.
On motion of Councilman Yoder, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; Council appoints
Aubrey J. Allen to fill the unexpired term of retired Councilman Rodeman.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Ochoa and Yoder
Noes: none
Absent: Councilman Valdivia
The executive personnel session was adjourned at 10:15 p.m. and Council returned
LO Chambers to reconvene at 10:20 p.m. to make the announcement of Mr. Allens
appointment. Council then adjourned.
• .-
J.C. Conle
City Clerk
Minutes of Regular Meeting
Held June 11, 1973
Beaumont, California
June 11, 1973
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers of the City Hall, June 11, 1.973, with Mayor Albert Haskell
presiding.
A moment of silent prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the following
Councilmen present: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Allen.
Present: 4
Absent: Councilman Yoder
Councilman Aubrey Allen was officially installed in his seat on the Beaumont
City Council. by City Clerk J. C. Conley.
There being no objections to the minutes of the Regular Meeting held May 29,
1973, the minutes will be filed as received.
On Motion of Councilman Valdivia, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City of
Beaumont will pay the bills as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Allen
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
The minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting held May 24, 1973, were noted
and filed.
On motion of Councilman Allen, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; The City Coun-
cil will accept the Quitclaim heed from the Beaumont Chamber of Commerce.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
On motion of Councilman Haskell, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City Coun-
cil will accept the recommendation. of the City Manager to'dedi.cate parcels for
park land and improve parking area. Legal description and plats to be provided
by City Engineer.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
On motion. of Councilman Allen, seconded by Councilman Haskell; The City Council
rejects the request of Medi -Trans for funding.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
On motion of Councilman Valdivia, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; City Council
accepts the recommendation. of City Manager Ward for no parking zone on a portion
of Seventh Street between Maple Avenue and Palm Avenue, and adopts Resolution
#1973 -15 to comply. Resolution. 1973 -1.5 to follow.
Ayes: 4
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
On motion of Councilman Haskell, seconded by Councilman Allen; Salvaclore Valdivia
was nominated for•Mayor Pro Tempore. Motion to close nominations by Councilman
Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Allen.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Ochoa and Allen
Abstain: Councilman Valdivia
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
Date of next regular study session set for Friday, June 22nd, 1973 at 4:00 ?n.m.
in the City Managers office at City Hall.
There being no further business, Mayor Haskell adjourned this meeting at 8:15 p.m.
_ Albert Haskell
Myo of "t ie City of- Te- aLUnont
J. C. Conle; _
City Clerk
RESOLUTION 1973 -15
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE
#369 BY ADDING TIIERE'['O A NO PARKING ZONE ONI
7th STREET BEr5iEEN MAPLE AVENUE AND PALM AVENUE.
WHEREAS: There has been determined that a hazardous area may
exist at a school crossing between Palm Avenue and Maple Avenue on 7th
Street.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED TH T:: On the South side of 7th Street
and in the West 1/2 of the block, beginning 20 feet from the West line (,,f
the alley a No Parking Zone will be installed in a westerly direction for
a distance of 48 feet. The Director of Public Services shall. cause the
curb, in the aforementioned area to be painted red - -
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT: Since the existing crosswalk, and the
parking zone established herein, are primarily for the use of the Palm
School Faculty and students to facilitate safe crossing of a city street
to a structure leased by the Beaumont Unified School District - -
THAT AT SUCH TIME as the School District terminates the use of the
leased facility this resolution shall be self executing and areas listed
herein shall revert to their former uses.
ATTEST:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
ss
Mayor City o eaumont
I, J.C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 1973 -15 was duly passed and
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont
duly held on the 11th day of June, 1973, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Allen
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Yoder
WITNESS MY HAND and the official seal of the City of Beaumont, this
11th day of June, 1973.
(SEAL)
4 ,�, City of um nt
Minutes of Regular Meeting
Held June 25, 1973
Beaumont, Calif.
June 25, 1973
The Beaumont City Council met in a regular session at 7:30 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers of the City Hall, June 25, 1973, with Mayor Albert Haskell
presiding.
A moment of silent prayer was held for the Invocation.
After the pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll call found the following
Councilmen present: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Allen.
Present: 4
Absent: Councilman Yoder
There being no objections to the minutes of the Regular Meeting held June 11,
1973, the minutes will be filed as received.
On motion of Councilman Valdivia, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; The City of
Beaumont will pay the bills as audited.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Allen
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
The minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting held June 14, 1973 were noted
and filed.
On motion of Councilman Valdivia, seconded by Councilman Ochoa, City Council
adopts Resolution #1973 -16 re: open space, landuse and conservation element
of Riverside County General Plan, affecting the City of Beaumont.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Allen
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Allen; City Council
grants request for street light at midblock location of Ninth Street between
Edgar Avenue and California Avenue.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Allen
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
On motion of Councilman Ochoa, seconded by Councilman Allen; City Council
grants request of City Manager to amend Ordinance #370 by adding thereto
the provisions of Ordinance #416, Section 520, and adopts Resolution #1973 -17
which City Attorney was instructed to prepare.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Allen
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
On motion of Councilman Allen, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; City Council
looks favorably on the request of Mr. Oscar Berg for contractual sewering
of proposed 27 lot subdivision, tract #5390, at the developers expense if and
when service is available.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Allen
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
On motion of Councilman Allen, seconded by Councilman Valdivia; City Council
adopts Resolution #1973 -18, submitting claim for Article 8, funds under SB 325.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Allen
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
1.
At 8:20 p.m. Council adjourned to the City Managers Office for a Personnel
Session to discuss the request of Police Chief to attend F.B.I. Academy.
On motion of Councilman Valdivia, seconded by Councilman Allen; City Council
grants Police Chief Salinas 12 weeks with full pay to attend the F.B.I. Academy.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Allen
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
Wo
A / � vw
Council reconvened at 7:59 p.m. in Council Chambers.
On motion of Councilman Valdivia, seconded by Councilman Ochoa; City Council,
City Clerk, City Manager and City Attorney will attend the League of California
Cities Conference October 21 -24. City Clerk to make the reservations.
Ayes: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Allen
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Yoder
On motion of Councilman Allen, seconded by Councilman Ochoa Mayor Haskell
is instructed to vote no on the Citrus Belt League of Mayors Resolution re:
Recalls.
Ayes: Councilman Valdivia, Ochoa and Allen
Noes: None
Abstain: Councilman Haskell
Absent: Councilman Yoder
Date of next regular study session set for Friday, July 6, 1973 at 4:00 p.m.
in the City Managers office at City Hall.
There being no further business, Mayor Haskell adjourned this meeting at
8:15 p.m.
Mayor Fff the City of Beaumont
RESOLUTION 1973 -I6
THE CITY OF BEAUMONT CITY COUNCIL TO
CONSIDER LAND USE, OPEN SPACE AND
CONSERVATION ELEMENT'S OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT IN CONJUNCTION WITH RIVERSIDE
COUNTY GENERAL PLAN AFFECTING THE CITY
OF BEAUMONT.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council, County of Riversdde, State
of California in regular session assembled on June 25, 1973, after public
hearings pursuant to Section 65563 Government Code. In and upon favor-
able recommendations of the Beaumont City Planning Commission that the
land use, open space and conservation element of the General Plan for
Riverside County is hereby amended as shown on the map and in the text
entitled "City of Beaumont Land Use, Open Space and Conservation Elements"
which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and in the office of the
City Planning Director and on file with the Secretary of the Beaumont Plan-
ing Commission.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the clerk of the City of Beaumont shall endorse
said map with the date of this adoption by this council. The City of
Beaumont Planning Department shall send a copy of the resolution to the
Secretary of the State Natural Resource Agency.
Mayor City of Beaumont
ATTEST:
4C'4
leek
y,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J.C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that the foregoing Resolution No. 1973 -16 was duly passed and adopted
at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont duly held
on the 25th day of June, 1973, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Allen
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Yoder
WITNESS MY HAND and the official seal of the City of Beaumont, this
25th day of June, 1973• /7
(SEAL)
RESOLUTION 1973 -17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA AMENDING ORDINANCE #370 By
ADDING THERETO SECTION 12a.
WHEREAS: Ordinance #370, Section 3 provides for amendment b y
resolution and
No
WHEREAS: The City Council has determined that a delinquency
clause is required to make Ordinance #370 compatible
with other sanitation ordinances for the City of
Beaumont. WW
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT: Section 12a is hereby added to
Ordinance #370 and shall read as follows:
DELINQUENCIES
If an invoice is unpaid thirty (30) days after mailing
the City shall thereupon mail a delinquency notice, and
if the invoice is still unpaid at the end of forty (40)
days from the date of mailing the first invoice, a penalty
of 107o shall be charged, and an additional 1 121'10 shall be
charged on the tenth of each month following.
Mayor City of Beaumont
ATTEST
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J.C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that the foregoing Resolution No. 1973 -17 was duly passed and adopted at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont duly held on
the 25th day of June, 1973, by the following vote:
wo
4 c
AYES: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Allen
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Yoder
WITNESS MY HAND and the official seal of the City of Beaumont, this
25th day of June, 1973•
(SEAL)
RESOLUTION NO. 1973 -18
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,
CALIFORNIA, SIGNIFYING ITS INTENTION TO SUBMIT A CLAIM FOR
FUNDS UNDER THE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT AND ITS AMEND-
MENT'S AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER AS REPRESENTATIVE TO
COMPLETE DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF CLAIMS FOR FUNDS.
WHEREAS, a State Program for local transportation improvement funds
known as the Transportation Development Act of 1971, Chapter 1400, Statutes
1971 (SB 325) and amended in law of AB 968, Chapter 1408, Statutes 1972, is
being implemented in Riverside County under the review of the Southern
California Association of Governments as the designated regional transpor-
tation planning agency; and
WHEREAS, the Riverside County allocation has been apportioned to provide
local transportation funds to the City of Beaumont for Fiscal Year 1973 -74 in
the amount of $37,110; and
WHEREAS, the City of Beaumont has substantial need for these funds in
construction improvements of local city streets and select system streets;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Beaumont will actively
participate in the program, and requests, in accordance with the Trans-
portation Development Act and its amendments, and applicable Rules and
Regulation under Article 8, the full payment of apportioned funds by the
Riverside County Auditor to the City of Beaumont with approval by the
Southern California Association of Governments;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council, City of Beaumont authorizes
City Manager, Joseph E. Ward, to act as authorized representative for the City
in completing all documents in support of claims for funds.
4
Mayor Ci y of eaumont
ATTEST:
� —C-(2 cx
7 t Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, J.C. Conley, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that the foregoing Resolution No. 1973 -18 was duly passed and adopted at
a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont duly held on
the 25th day of June, 19733 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman Haskell, Valdivia, Ochoa and Allen
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Yoder
WITNESS MY HAND and the official seal of the City of Beaumont, this
25th day of June, 1973.
(SEAL)